Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1988/03/23 - Agenda Packet
�// 0701-02 0 3-23 -88 ` PC Agenda o 1_ of 6 jII'f t! if RAN ..R NdNo� - 5�!ED tS � • MARCH 23,198' pa,� �. PALM #61 y� ]AB v}�4Aw�+4 U + XAhPH0 CUCANOWA, oJ pu4pa. I Commiaalwwr Blakeslay Commissioner Emeat* ' Commi inner Chitlee r ; '' ' Comm.ssir+ner Melviol Commiasioner Tolgtoy M Aww"C'Semoats IV. AppMal of WAkw \1 ' MelVh 9, Z988 I i= • - Caarsent Cdr. The following Consenj Calendar item' ��s taq� tagt to be rout ne cafid } y ntz- cGntrover iait. They w ill he acted th by them Commission at one time ;without discussion, If anyone Ill$ concemm over anv itg n, it `2,� siusrti� Fiemo d£scussion. A. TRACT' 13i?-A DESIGN REVIEW - BRLMAR DEVELOPMENT - 4 T3 sign relierr n building eleva #ions said detail jsite p or 23 airtigis family homes within a previously apprav )tract of 82 lots an 86.53 acres of land in the Very Law Residential District on the north side of Almond Street at Bergl Street � AFNs 1061- 811 -•12, 16;1461- 821 -3, 4, 6, 9-22 Ti B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELC?PMENT REVIEW ir • 1 - RIE N - e desreiopmant caw a „warehauae!dq;butian„ facility' tfltaIing 77,591, square feet or 3.7 ' ” acres{'of lei in the 'Gfneral industrial District CSuharpea 14 located; art the truest side R �f Of a,:acster Avenue (cid), Sol of 6 U7. Street -� APN: 229••'3 -• 11 , VL Fume Mortars } `Site Adnowti items cc{� Ubttc hearow in 10hich concerned individuals hair may Voice opinion of the retatett i Aa ►j2 t 'ts�' ,`,fie a� t to bt# r*dQW4XQd by the Chairman ow oddreas ih Grommi aorc 5j statutg. l your name and addM*''. 411 such opintow Mail D jimi per lndivid aatt�ol' .each pro }sct_ .� r C. - C11�1IiIN'Y'Ai, A35E831VIENT AND gP.NERl i, PLAN l !9 - ?S U RSH DRMOPMENT - A r+asst fi emend ., LW 'Uaa R ► rOM LOW - Medium diaSb�7gr► f »S dwelllcts units per acr#) rah Residential t2�! -� 30 dwelling units per sore!; roj' 5.05 aa�sra�/eot iarxir located on the south Bide of Bove sine Road, west of qtr hibW Avenue -� .10N: 209,,0311s, lo.- ,�ConthVMd =.from February IQ, loss) D. ENVM0NB1k?; `AL ABSEMMENT AND t DnELOPMENT AM HD t?U 6PRI r to -Amen6 Development eta M MM w- Medip" (4 OW- wats per arsre) to lilt 1 t3wl €-33 ;i dx n ,!hits per am) attached with llouein& overlay Distr)dr Gi ViD) to tb* bttae district 41,41 located aka +�f located _ s on the spuds side of axst oi' ltihiba::�i Avent APSds a08- 031.18,10 ontinu#d irOm Zebru&710, loss) E. DEVE t1�1 MEN AGREEMENT 87-02 - NdURSB Dl3VE%,t3P1�lEN'i r volopm w# w# S Bement ' xween a City p �tet�cho Curatn and- a,� F.W`.. Development for the p�rp of provid a Senior to lsrc� t per, the r uizotndn s � f the 4. Senior lm 'Over l District (section ft.10.O40 of he Developm t C--oda, Ord%nce 211) for 170 apartment units to be located the south side of Base Line Road, west of Archibald Avenue \. API+It 20 31 1st is. Wontiffll from February 144 v 1.98.8) - .,. F. El�i'YII��CINMENTAL ASSESSMENT . AND GENERAI, PLAN N - Ni? IN TNKEN - A reque t to arrdenci the I.estd U66, from- LOW Medium Realential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Office far , '?And- 1.69 acres Of located On the west side of Archiba)G: �iventtie, south of Base- Line Road - APN. 208431-17, 54, 55, ,e an# 57. (Continued from February IQ, 1988) o �a fr _ ' '1.�7Ax_�E"a�'i51' Lip BN"k11iORIvdENTAL I lWFSS M NT Abib D OP T- I Eiw[ lul to lm,,' r►r _ Devel i r.serst Dis#riet hiaip i� LoW- Medium �aa�t�at' (4-8 derelling units �a Office iae� aer darcf(Wonsl- for 1.6v acres r'r iatid, located cm the welt snaie of Amhibfid Avenue = S*th f l Line ;mod -- APN: 301 031.111, so araI CfoitOwed 6om'Eez 10, �.98a> I li. v,,,zvll oxmENT�r1L �S5SES63ta Eha'Ai�b DEVELOPMENT . Et;1"�IEFi� ` � ; 74 - D The dsvelwit 0 ' $e oar apartments ort mete aaf la6Z lia the loci Medium lte i4eniiel' District (4-81 drFa3lil as item), 11 u per located Ca the south �idae a£ Base Line ' !P West jr 1 As000iateo with the Is Removal Parm ft 8844,19, L EN- ON'Kt TAL ASSESSMENT AKMx OONDMONAL USE. ' regu est tai eniab a cacSset store in at�3sasesi spaft CT B, ikq�tare ; feet ii i & eBn eacdat tuult- tasnant industrial Miter in the 00neral lnduotrlul T iddet (ftars4 4 ), ' located at 0155 Archibald Avenue,- A PNt 209 - 211 -44. J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS T A1iD CQ1dilITIf2NAL USF�} PERM � M 42 T R AI � 7Ck�e �dat�elaptttant. of automobiles rviee m .std bUideiingir tow -sg 44,220 square feet',on 4.46 aorta aid land. in itx�!Oeneskhi driYdustiel Dtstrlot; Subarea c, 106ated at the northoas orneE of Vineyard Avenue and Ninth meat APN 209412-1 �( K. ENVIRONMENTAL TAL ASSESSNijWT AN6 TENTATIVE RA 1 - L MA ' - OX Q Ii 'lit � ` . D ' RIM t i��i A >ei ertt i - an+tt�=tov 1 uMl units on IV-9 acres of 19*1 im, tM Medium- IliEgh F Residential District (14-24 dwealing,t rsita.per ac a ):located on the south aide of Lo mon Ave tuo, e"t of HaVon Avenue - APN.- 201 - 241 -i5. kyociated with the proposal is Tree Removal Permit 88- i91. EI+1V ROPiMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DZVELOPMENT ;119' F-W T.- lSl,z#1 LfkMA . - OXFORD 1. t ESN A rmpext to amend -the Woveecd Master Plan to r allow two story units along tha Umon Avenue frontages and to ^ allow an ineireose in_ density >Vlthin the northorn 145 feet from 6 dwelling n 4ts per 8a7C to 8.6 dw *HUV units per acre for PbW* M consisting of 2FZ aoc►doTndn Will on 18.8 sores of lead in the 1 Medium -High Residential District t14 -24 deyeliing units per acre) ' Iodated on the 3outh side of Lemon Avenue -,je. of H velj livenues APilt 201- 2n-7S. 1f 1 . Y VIL mwAQkmw �.. 3MViitEYMMENTA "AM ESSMiENT AYD DEVEL )PMI£sdT k9VMN* . - iot *171,'641 r 7.7 aorosl of W 1 w r;ar*rel hadua fill Diswet (Sub` ei a 8 ;f �i 9 ,I"atod at th8 nothh ty� ,c,,�)qrrar & 'lio�.(wAs extd the Atchis ; T e'er t J e l�iF.�+vaw. - APN2 229-121-;,1 uio,72. n: j 0 ' Ma -Q$M '�! � .rl� ?(le1N �' LSY ESt+ P gi�Y' Yli'i�1 e developmant of a r 8� sq owot 1.7 aares of W4 in tl* Lora- Meeci{z►M Eksidessi Distr€e PUA AmoWment 11 ;r MT N). le�cateed � wmt of lrahjbiM A snue- „�+suth of ( r> Neale Liree - A UK, 1 $08431 Y7 64, 5a, 56 *W 57. 9aesaciated witfi the projowt is Tree ; R Qvsl Permit 88 -14. VnL Ad¢ N. tJNiPOiiM” SWK PROGRAM FOR �f'iOh`� eu. l�,eatezt ett ttortheaat t5 or Bm :rrr G Haver. Arrmue. O. FnA 3. xin i1P a�TF]G�Yi3 ;cz, STk ilwnolts (oril ` rims is tna'� time and piacs por the 4auerat puma to addr a mfr. Cornmiscfon. tt¢rna to be disci Aare are - ,those vh h do r44 414*tg#v fi}3pwr Oil this ivarde. C XL AdJaumment Th# PiaiOlLn r Coenrniaaton has adopted Adrn'`.nfstrrmOvea keguiutior i set an X i g*ttt. adjodreni tame.f itetrr,+� ,ge.be3yared ihat tittaeq 3iky Kati be has i oniy vertth Via consent n� thet ^arnzraisston. { p`t �S t Q y • ra,s�.e/s: e.�arlaaY 4M.�ry. ..r. ow- xt >Rd F aA _ r at a mt aws p" \ yrec �s . PiatL Pit Wig as kip C'7Y r± RANCHO CUCAMONGA , * ' PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting i } March 9, 1958 Chairman Larry McNiel called the Regular Meeting�di the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to carder at 7 :00 p.m. The meeting was held at Lions Park Community Center, ,•9151 ease Lire Road,, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Chairman McNfty then led 'in, the pledge of a7legi ance. ROLL CAL,. COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: David BlakeslV, Suzanne Chitiea, Bruce 1 Emerick, Larry McMiei, Peter Tolstoy 1 is COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Brad Buller, City planner; Otto 16ro6H.1 , Deputy City Planner; Dan Coleman, Senior Planner,; Scott Murphy, Associate planner; Debaa Meier, Associate planner; Russell Maguire, City €69ineer; Silil Silva, Deputy City Engineer; Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer; doe Stofa, Associate Civil Engineer; Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney; and [wren Kissack, planning Commissi(A Secretary AN00OU iCEFN NTS 1 There were no announceEmnts. i APPROVAL W NINUTES Roved by Commissiener Chitica, seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy, carried, to approve the mirates of F44rukry 24, 1988 as modified. Commissionar Blakesley abstaingjd from voicing' - -as _ was not present at that meeting. CONSENT CALENDAR A. TIME EXTENSION FOR DEVELOPA,91' REVIEW 85 -43 - TOWER PARTNERSHIP The development" of a two-sip - i'dereeta-IT building to no 21,000 square feet within an approved integrated business center (Virginia Dare) in the General Commercial District iocated at the northwest quadrant of Foothill .Boulevard and Haven ;Avenue - 11PH: 1077.661 -06. Planning Commission Minutes 1 March 9, 1988 ,;�s:a.T X2643SICt -dui _IJfiMAk AND BROAD - Design review of `iu � l� no elevations a por on o a, prey ousiy approved tract reap consisting of 466 single family lots on 104 acres of land within the Caryn Planned Community, located north of Highland Avenue on U4 west side of Rochester Avenue - APNz 225- 141 -8, 27, 41, 43 and 225- 151 -3, 7, 8, 10 -17, Chairman McNiel opened it up to the Commission and public if anyone wished to address the items on the Consrsnt Calendar. hearing none, Commissioner Chitiea moved to approve the Consent Calendar, Commissioner Blakkesley seconded the motion. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES. COMMISSIONERSt CHITIEA, BLAKESLEY, EKERICK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIORERS NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -- carried PUBLIC HEARIM C MODIFICATIONS TO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR PARC'CL MAP 9537., PARCEL request me _ se'C`o�z ons o Approval requ r,ng undergrounding of utilities alung 9th Street for the (Avelopment of an industrial Park and related Parcel Maps in the General" industrial District (Subarea 2),,located on the northeast corner 6f- Vineyard Avenue and Sth Street - APH: 209- 012 -17, 20, & 21. (Continued from February 24, 1988). Joe Stofa, Assistant Civil Engineer, presented the staff report. Mr. Scott Peotter, representative of Messenger Investment Company, 16912 -A Port Karnan Avenue, Irvine, CA, stated, Messenger requests the relielting of the responsibility 'of undergrounding in front of their neighbor's property. They concur with the staff report and request that the requirement be deleted on the`,- maps. Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Chairman McNiel questioned Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney, whether the letter received from the property owner on Parcel ,i is a binding document. Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney, stated it is not binding since we don't know the terms it was a *pressed to this person. He suggested that a condition be addizd to each of the approving resolutions stating the modification is e;Spressly contingent upon the w*ner of Parcel 1 executing a covenant to he mcorded against Parcel I evidencing the intent to underground adjacent to Parcel. 1. This would be.bin.3ing and could give notice to this owner or any furore property owner.` Planning Coamis�ijon Minutes. - 2 . March 9, 1988. r' r; = '"i'Sjt�ESt L ict —sort lib 1C`hearing b3+ 1'6opeftiGi�� Chairmar'McNiel reopened the public tmaring. Mr. Peotter questioned the restricts on the property of the adjacent owner and wouldn't the existing.co:sdition a;9 the parcel slap which he is, part of suffice for the condition of undergrounding7 There is nothing } indicating who is responsible for paying for what portion and it is just a natter of timit+g. Revising the condition to state.that it is upon the development of the adjacent property would gill bind it .for that condition. Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney, stated it walld and,the modification being granted is on the presumption that the adjacent owner is o comfortable with this and it is imposing a new expense on them. This is the reason for the recorder covenant. Chairman McNiel agreed this Was the safest position to take. Conzissioner Blakesley agreed. Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing, Commissioner Chitiea moved fa approve all three: resolutions of item C, with the mWfication as ruggested by the Deputy City Attorney, Commissioner Ulakesley secgnded the motion. Motion carried by the following vote: AYCS. COMFIISSIONERS. NITIEA., BLAKESLEY, EMERICK, MCNIEI., TOLSTOY NOSS: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE * * * * - _carried D. ENVIRONMENTAL, ASSESSMENT AM TENTATIVE; Fit tL MAP 11222 ULTMANS/ FiNELL7 su Kzs�on o ts.� acres 0 anc� in parcels i'n a enera3 Indu;stria'l District, Subarea 132 located at tto southeast corner of bth Street and Buffalo Avenue APN« 229- 263 -10, 11, 12 a;sd 13. Joe Stffa, Assistant Civil Engineer, presented the staff report. Chairman McNiel questioned the depth in Parcel Map 6 of the long, slender lot as this will.4-k�an awkward lot in which to deal with later. i. Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, stated approximately 135 feet. Chairman.Mckiel opened the public hearing. planning Commission Minutes - 3 March 9, 1988 �r � r� i Mr. Sill Harris, representative of Joseph S. Hyde Civil Engineers, 5150 E. Hunter, Anahaim, CA concurred with the staff report and Conditions thereof, Chatrmast &Niel closed the public: hearing„ Commissioner Chitiea stated this parcel map separates it into individuet b( 'Idings that can be sold and since it has been through the Design Review process, she did not see any problems. Commissioner Toistoy questioned if a building has been proposed for Parcel 6. Commissioner Chitiea stated that a building had not been proposed for Parcel 6. She also noted that since the street alignment is already set there isn't wtuch they can do to increase the depth of that particular pa-,,,;el. Commissioner Chitiea moved to approve- the resolution, Commissioner - Blakesley seconded the motion. Motion carried by the folowing vote.;; AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, BLAKESLEY,, EMERICK, KNIhl, TOUTC, NOES; COMMISSIONERS. NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NON[; * * * * * * --carried t E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS&NT, AND TENTATIVE ThACT 13825 - FANNON .-'A reszden a su �v s on an esign review'of 6 single 1rW iy 1ots, on 1.5 acres of land in the Low aesidential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre), located north of 19th Street, east of Hermosa Avenue at the northern terminus of grissac- Place. APR: 202-191 - 22 Scott Murphy, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Commissioner Blakesley questioned if the freeway was elevated? Mr. Murphy responded that it was. Commissioner Tolstoy Questioned if there was going to Lc a wall around the project. Mr. Murphy stated that there would be one of the conditions, in the resolutions states the wall along the freeway be approved by the Planning Commission which is consistent with previous actions to maintain some continuity along the freeway corridor. Chairman "Iel opened the public - hearing. Planning Commission Minutes -' 4 - Karc 1988 Mr. Peter M. Laden, 23277 Ventura Bind, Woodland Hills, CA, expresj�ed his appreciation of staff's work,,-}They are in agreement th stat {,!z °L report. Mr. Laden requested verii , tion on the design of tip f7i wjy. A 'ead Buller, City Planner, stated that staff it develop!ag a request for .he 1988 -89 budget to hire a consultant to do the entire freeway corridor. In the. interim, the davelopar will present a design, to show they am compatible With the adjoiniiq properties in the near vitinity.; It should be consistent with surrounding properties and ther approvals. The design of the wall will go through the Design t��view process. ¢ Chairman McNiel closed tale public hearing. CamMiSSioner Slake0ey moved approval: of the resolution, Commissioner Chitiea seconded the motion: RYES: COMMISSIORERS; BLAKESLEY. CHITIEA, !MERICK, MCNIEt„ TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE E ABSEL1: COMMISSIONERS: NONE * * -- catrikd F. ENVIRONMENTAL iISSESSMEN?':14ND GEVTLOPWr.NT REVIEW $e-01 -SAN W1?tt 0 Y_ pp development, developiRent, of a me ca ceg er cons s ira'y "1 i Of 3g,ar foot ambulatory, health care fail�ity and ,2,93; -!uare feet of medica> offices on O acres of land in the r4axel use (AHO) District within the Terra Vista Planned Cowunity, located at the southeast corner of .Milliken Avenue and Church Street - APR: 227. 151 -13, 14. G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENWIYE i�ARCF L MAP 1,1,341 w i.E4fI5 T- su v slon —or- T]l. acres f an anf F pares in .?e err, Vista Planned Community, located at the southeast corner of Church Street and Milliksse Avenue - AP!i: 227- 151 -13, 14. related File: OR 88-01. Debra Meier, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. j Chairman ScNiel opened the public hearing. Me. Georg, Kuykendall, Senior 'lice President of Operations at San Antonio Community Mospital, 999 San Bernardino Road, upland, CA, stated the project would provide ambulatory care services, emergency services and physician offices in an integrated and planned development. Commissioner Toistay asked if the concept of health care has changed recently to where the medical personnel serving this facility will be housed: within the facility? Therefore, the need for per,_W aI offices will not occur*. Planning Commission Minutes 5 March 9, 1988 Mr. Kuykandall responded that thit concept will pro vv'� e a ,_o6Icentr and locus for health care and l re convenient for�lpatfients to _�ave Dion ' physicians and specialists availlAble to them in- this setting ',San Antonio 'Community Hospital does clot have control over where physitUns ray locate elsewhere within tbe c,r,Ity. Commissioner Tolst4y stated his -oncern regarding this was the design and user surrounding the hospital within Lewis Development. Commissioner Tolstoy questioned who would be the major users? Chairman McHiel stated this would need to be asked of Lewin Development; ,., however, they mar construct some ancillary buildings to the hospital." :Commissioner Enerick questioned whether the doctors who don't practice at San Antonio Community Hospital will be sllowed to rent space. Mr. KuyWWall stated there can not be a legal restriction to an arrangement like this but obviously they would prilffer to have. doctors 'on their medical staff at San Antonio Community Hospi*al., Chairman McNiel closed the public hearin4,� i Commissioner Chitiea stated this project anfasset to the City. Chc'rman WNW,, stated this is a good- looking facility and it is probably the evasest tt� what the City is looking for in regards to a hospital. Commissioner Emerick moved to approve the resolution for Item F, Commissioner'Biakesley seconded the notion. Motion carried the following votes _f �� AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ENERICK, BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERSW, NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE Commissioner alakesley moved .to approve the resolution for Item G, W-wissioner Chitiea seconded the "!potion. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIF.A, EMERICK, MCNIEL, TOLSTV NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: CWIMISSIONERS: NONE * * _4 arried n Planning Commission Minutes - 6-- ' larch 9, 1988 „' OLD BUSINESS H. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT' 12332 - CRiSTIANO - A custom lot residential su V s on 6 1- o 5 on approxely 85 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2 ()telling units per acre), i,t -;ted on the e8ist side of Haven Avenue, north of Hillside Drainage Channel - APN; 201- 121 -24, (Continued from February 24, 1988). Barrye iWson, Senior Civil Engineer, presented the staff report. Commissioner.__Tolstry questionid Engineering if in the future the triangular Vfece'shou:d be avallabie and some one else should acquire it, will 94 lots be atle to financially support a crossing of tY; channel_ Mr. Eanson responded that-it cart occur. I Commissioner Blakoley stated the exhibits show a street ,coming out of Tract 12332 that ends in a '.ul,,de -sac and if this develops, will there still be the availability access. L- Mr. Hanson stated there would be. Bill Silva, Deputy City Engineer, added, that it would be fully improved to the tract boundary, both street extensions to tt) east would b�_% extended to the limits of the tract. This would be curb and gutter and paving. Chan -ran McHibl opened the public; hearing. Bob Szolomayer, representing CristUno Companies, 44400 MacArthur Boulevard, Newport Beach, stated they have tried to mitigate the issues that were discussed at the lasttseeting. They are in agreement with the staff report, Bruce Ann Hahn.'' -A7 Granada Court, Alta Loma, stated there are several concerns of the homeowners regarding the access. Their major concern is emia gency aeons and she feels this has not been solved. The triangular piece at the top would have U. be developed before the condition of access would be answered and there is no tract map on that piece. The wedge piece would also have to be developed and this has not been sold by the Flood Control District. In the reports, Associated Engineering talked about some emergency access alternatives. There is an existing bridge at the top so residents could possibly get out and go northerly across the existing bridge and cove down the Flood Control District's easement on the other side of the channel. However, /without emergency access easement, emergency access is stilt 'the maj6r concern. l_fter speaking with the fire department, Ms. Hahn stated they, )too, would like to see an emergency access to the east;. She questioned Engineering if there are plans to extend Milliken. Planning Commission Minutes 7 March 9, 1988 J. J-% Mr. Hanson stated that ti* bridge is used by Southern California Edison and Los Angelo dater and Power. However, the difficulty with it is getting from this "ct..to it. There are some easements concerns and the actual usability of the facility. It does not look particularly viable but has some potential`';. 1, an extreme emergency, more so for emergency vehicles to get in and 1t gs feasible for residents getti:_g ou,� that way. Fr",,D tlaven, you- could get there, it is a gravel roar. however. Regard'fhg the progress on Milliken, the property to the: east; of Deer Creek Channel is owned by the Eload Contra: District and Engineering feels it is highly unlikely that Milliken will be developed straight north as shown by the developer's engineer becaast.i of the restrictions on the property ort that side of the channel, it may curve tc the east. The Flood Control District has not declared that property surplus so Engineering has rv� idea when or if that will happen. If it does, it will be a much smaller street than Milliken south to Wilson. Marc Roy, 5068 Calypso Court, Alta Low, stated that as the tract map is` presently designed 80- 85,:�percent of all the traffic to the vest will have to exit on Ringstem as a natural course of traffic flow which means acc9rding to the Traffic Department of 3300 trips per daffy. This is going to create sate traffic circulation problems. The present development r74 the kart to the east is drawn in a whole series of small cul -de- -sacs ox 15 lots per cul -de -sac. In the back part of the ma ;; there is no consistency of the project with what was designed developed in the front part of it. Instead of having- short c;ll -de -sacs these are seat cul -de -sac boat an extremely long, winding mad-with 30.50 lots on there also adding to the congestion. In referents to the traffic flow and consistency throughout the tract map, the residents would like to see something else dome. They would also like to see sco*thing definite on easement agreements. They would like to see something firm that says that at this particular point in time the people who live th;nre could exit at certain exits when there is a problem. Larry Clark, 6726 Teak Way, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he supported Mr. Ray`s co!aaonts. The residents would Tike to see a:► ability to exit through the east s1de to balance the traffic flow and the proposal doesn't afford this capability. The current developers are reluctant to build the bridge andl provide the access. She problem will be mayniffed io years to come.. Frank Williams, Associated Engineer representative, 316 Fast "G" Street,. Ontario, clarified they tai the developers) understood that ability for the adjacent properties to support the conttruction of the bridge would include a third property,, the property south of the Hillside Ch ;? ei. They understood that all three properties would trigger that circulation element. Regarding emergency access, extensive discussions with the Flood Control District, the Bureau of Parer and Water, and Southern California Edison have been field and though they have not said it can not be done, it is a long -term prccoss !Ad there are no guarantees. The Flood Control District is very reluctant to grant access unless sowbody Plafining COM13.0on Minutes . $ >> March,,, 3g� F � El { fi a G IM oxner •nan z?e riooa consroe uistrict assumes °vae iiadtiity for the use of the access. They do nod :few a developer or A homeowners association., as a proper party to assume liability. They Yook to the City to assume that liability. Ms. JoAnre Knatcher, 5083 Bramble Court, Alt.t Loma, CA, stated her concerns rwgarding the access: roads, traffic flow, -,Ind the high crowws in the streets. Hisam aurrani, resident of Haven View Estates, stated he concurred with Mr. Clark's comments and stated that the City should have_,init: ally reviewed these matters when first approving the plans,, Chairman McKie] closed the public hearing. Chairman McNiei clarified the t',!ee issues,before the, Commission mere: 1) emergency access, 2) intersection vfs. 1ti V on north -south streets, 3) street widths. Commissioner Tolstoy stated because of the length mad _width of tt.is tract, he felt there should be some type of emergency access. Further, he felt that the drainage is quite a problem 'on the north -south streets and some other mitigation measures other that the crown shold be considered for arty stew construction. Mr. Hanson stated that there are comments in the resolution to try to spread or make the humps wider but this runs the risk of making very steep streets and this needs to be lo6ked at very carefully. Ct,m!mis6ioner Tolstoy stated that since these are private streets, the only way to make then safer is for the homeotilners, association to put stop signs on the existing streets. the City doesn't have jurisdiction over that. Commissioner Chitiea stated she agreed with Commissioner TO stoy regarding that some type of emergency access c' :uuld be provided Regarding the visibility in tho: crown of the reads, she woulJ like to sce some different design used and possibl;a four -way stops at those locations where there may be a problem. Chairman McNiel requested clarification of access easements. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated the developer has attempted to acquire emergency access easements across the Frood Control propo.ky but have been told no unless the City wants to take responsibility and liability for that access, Commissioner Tolstoy stated that though ecoramics are important to the developer, but the money needs ta) be spent now and not later for a direct, positive exit from this project to the east. Planning Comm,$Sion Minutes 9 #arch 9, 1988„ a e -- _ Chairman Mckiel questioned if the south side of Hillside Channel was deYelopedr' e, Brad Buller, City Planner, stated yes and no, the priiOrty imaedietely . south of this proposal and west of the easterly property line of t1y's tract is currently being 'developed, but southeast of this proiect ��, vacant and no formal application for developont has been submitted. Commissioner Chitiea questioned who+ the City would have to accept liability fOr the access and why not the homeowners association? Barrye Hansen; SPni'or, Civil t-jinear, state„ this is a i�egwireatent of the Flood Control District. Commissioner Exerigk stated tKre is a condition in the resolution that requires the-developer to deAgn, a cul -de -sac at the southeast corner of the tract with both, 4 turnarouisd and an access to the pM-perty to the east as approves bathe City Engineer; 8ra0 Buller, My planner, stated that matter before the Commission tonight is the extension of the map. 1'i Flood Control District east of this map it the key if iaergency access to the is east required at this time. Without Flood Control cooperation emegency acciss to the east may not be possible, Chairman WNiel stated t-.! Flood Control people are not .ruing to gram an easement without the liahi'ity transfer, Brad Buller, City Manner, added if access is required, Flood Control -- night be more likely to grant easement across them pauper tv -r J ;he request way only for the southern tip of their property. If ah- accoss easement is_requirad from the north to south along the entire length of the Flood Control ptnpertyf it can be expected that Flood_Control may be a little mv.3 -e reluctant to granti!g an easement. "omissioner Cmerick st A he was n6t' -1n favor to extesading the C,, 4y!s liability to the penefi f a private street. Ralph Hanson, Deputy Cit$l Attorney, stated that conditioning via map with offsite improvements across property owned neither by the reveloper or the City creates a problem. It is not a valid idea to pu,} a condition on the asap A problem arises, too, when the City through eminent domain an action which is c1readt public land put #(Eea, Public purpose. This relates to the willingnesi 0,7 the Flood rontrol District to cooperate. Comissioner Emerick SUted that Haven would be heavily .impacted in. the event of any emergency, fire: flood, or earthquake. He also stated that,, ready of the potential disasters, i.e.. fire, flooding, ' would comefrora the north and east and therefore war not sure emergency access t> the east would be a good solution. Planning Commission Minutes 1D t4arch, ?9tb911 r II Brad Ball.Or City;Vlanner, stated currently there is no emergency access to the east acrd =.� the Flood Control land unt?l you get down to Highland, Commissioner Blakesley staWl he agreed wit;: Commissioner Ea-rick and Ralph Hanson that there frn`'; a way to obtain an access °'and action should be on the utter presented. Chairman McNiel reopened the public hearing. Frank Williams, Associated Engineers representatixe, clarified that when the,u2veloper met with the Flood Control District-on the easG�ent issue, they asked the Flood Control District what would happen if.the developer graded a road across their pro "ety to the grav:;l road aiang the chantlel which exists The Flood fWhtrol; District responded they would n; t J� prevent them to so * as long as, the developer did not put it in an top of the Ievee; or sdt.t otb,pr point o 'zg��. .- ,,would require the developer to gate the access to that rda�d� ith some forma of crash :gate. Commissioner Chit0ea raised concern that the Commission ,might waivo `. public safety for the development of this land, Bob Szolomayer, Cristiano,repr sentative,,,s'taUd the developer has mile f a formal :-quest to Deer Greek to buy a 'lot for the purpose of access to the s`ath. 'ale believed access � o the south through Deer :ammk would be of totally sh6y totally denied this request. They litve tried many more than happy to provide a graded i�argercy access.. Bruce- Ann ;Hahn questioned whafi would happen if Oistiano sold Their f property H ice Cristiano does not build homes. ;`Haw would this bs conditioned?l j Chairman McNiel.,stated'd4 apt t;te p o erty would go through the City's design Review Proce,_ -- Chairman McNiel reelused the �Ilh> `ic Commissioner Emerick moymis iipproiA o €, the resolution. Coesmissioner' Biakesely seconded the votfun. Motion carried by the following vote: RYES: COMMISSIONERS: V4ERICK,,,PLAKESELY, MCNIEI. ,z -; NOES COMMISSIONER$: CHITIEA, TRLSTO�' � ABSE.M COMMISSAWS: NONE Brad Buller, City Planner, stated the Commission entertain minute action to dirert staff to work wing ; Flood Control to encourage their. in developing _ participation an accv;as to the waft. ` = Aanniag Commission Minutes r} /I l C�t j CoAmissioner Tolstoy stated th -t he felt tw tract is a good da�l�, but t publ it sa,fav i4 tom'%- iacpor; . csrried . .. 1 I. APPEAL OF THE UNIFORM 5169 Ptiti i FOR `ALTA -LAMA PLJ`JA SHOPPING - app ea o o-d ions 1QTf 41PVM A " o a non or=- xo�osed by the Char Plaaq�r for the' tenants +shin tiAe Plaza Shopping Center lccated at the wi southeast corner o�i i� ;��et AM` Carnelian. Stretit. _ I Brad 9u,:e , City W1anaer, stated at staff' "Is irr. recr 'pt of a Iet4r withdrawin the p g A• Real e:45 p.m. - Planning Cowftsi"nssed it i° 8:55 p.m. - Planning Comislion Reconvence r , - ` .I- FAMILY SEiEIMKS ills ti( PLANNED COWUiWTTIES tt INU14 UNIT . SIZE, Ftk. tl,dl - FAMILY UELLINGS - CiV oumv€ i i °a e s u review thee sae rega ttmel s for multi -fam ly Brad Bt{ller,; City Planner^ , presented the, staff report. Commtissiotie? Chitiea stated she, felt i't very dasirahie to bring the _ setbacks in mhformancqt to the studards elsewhere in thre ;,Ci:y, ° ,Tile additional setbacks really add to a project. Cora;issiotier Wrick stated the Design Review Co"ittoe was1ooking at an ak,;�rtment complex and it appeared it ke too close to t. street with tha , ?units fairly Closo together which gave it an _anpleasant appeerence, -This is what spax6%d the cowission to review the setbacks for m0ti- family land uses. Commissioner Emr#ck• .arced w'tn Commissioner Chitiea 's comments. Commissioner BlakeOey stated he"�'felt uncorifortibla with the n foot setback on a major arterial street and fz'it the sotbacks sh(sltd be corks• stout with pis« Development Code, Chairmad McNiei opened t€se public >hwing. ._.. Planning. Com*tission Iiinutes - 12 - , ,M i^cif° giiL 1958 l Mw« John Kelcher,' represetfting Zex +s s Managearnt Cgrp 31evelopsr5 ° - ,Hcl - of char TTerra Efis is�a�t; xtaid av ire brigfiha1 desg of'ie pleed . --�.. cemaunities there were certain considerations, trade -offs, etc «., were proposed. Among thei'm were the Lessee setbacks in the belief that.Mgher quality architecture, better Site pluMina, enhanced Comw.tnit,y amities o ~kind offered 4 balarce that would offset the of results that would be I achieved by .the wide setbacks that individual pro3ects., have to observe, area✓ ar8ul like to. sre a workshop session' to review the setbacks, Mr. Stephen: Ford, representing Lire Pulliam Lyun Company, developers of , Vlctcr�a planned i,,Ce snity,' . stated he suppor�cE ;,.Ir. Melcher's me it . dots, s•tat an arbitraary 3ctiott to au o>s fricall,y Increaso. thy: setbacks to 000M with the Development Code -des not tare int+ti consideraticm the effort that went into d;velopfng the c^.o +rni � pFan and the benefit$ that Ave inherent in the �ev�lo p�a�t aJ� a laa.•t' t planned Corwunity. The�e are ;02n loint 04-uirements of #p c Ommunyty pIan e for developing open spate oyar, r. above those requfr d anywviAre else in the City.' r7 Ford std #�sd a %01,i planned cowwnities have r unique design stanaardi r� �rfiidri'r r�wd,a660er approach would be, to review o nueb. oP> 8f ltga' °`es� tacb -n r t co *ts Sn,, ! Cc!missioner Tolstoy st�tr¢,-�ttitt planned c.Wunities er#.ainly afi•er the t City a ralch better pro .�� If there is A planned Cvmu tys the trade-, off for having plti .red ercmmuoity is allowing- sse t1if+Fcrerlra 'From the rest of the Ci;�r�= lird felt so" of the" ",Mdd -offs in lticWpila certainly . must be offset the, setback ,differentiae . Chairman MCNIal stated the 41e1t theta. Un't Much diff+:rence ft' punned `- communities. Ore of the t6ltigs stadv *;t off were 3,000 and 4,000 foot lots bec,use'they are not :found any &ro elza- in the City. Also °traded off was 600 and 700 square foqt �k �.lfngs nbt %���� �lseNhnre ;t �. the Ca t . rouission!ar ;,toted h* ft;gt that there- 13 too tit ai;.'df'a: disparity betw"n� rthat the rest '�f the City abides by arid- the pinkihed cbt Ci7if�iEl5 nd.�it`y should narrom ilg,, qap or,Close it+!�entirely CcMnissioner trait #Ca stated. Sho fe4t/ tills was not an o6 trary dirertioa I: but based on concra a examples unit r&,i*_put,,,i,� place 'khan are somewhat less than successful,' TO rt0htot st hetiiea thi dtistrts, the wide ."open �f spaces, and the so-rbacks> Tor tfia- single - family &,ell°ings aliong the , street zra more noticeable when the, dense pro�>•?Gt is ,,ppushed rigb�a opt to the street. There is greater lu4ss, helght, a1Y density vO ght tip, to the street and this Us not proved `wz_be \ \Sl4tc+essf'u1. "'O"issionew Chorea stated there should be soar relief -sme the 'streetscape i important and < 1olt that the planned , coaounities should he brI)oght into confar*iance, Planning ttmnlz"i,6x Minutes - 13 r g March 9, 198$ . l�l t f kl t Commissioner Tolsf"y stated he was not against snaking to setbacks wider than ..what. they n;,wc__are..hut• ih£jt _should_nat :,he. likr� i�he.- rest -. of "the City. Coa+missiontr Tols'toy stated there should be diJcussion and seeing Sam neighborhoods° with !r vtain size houses and ceriAin size lots wnere there could he mad3usto nt. He did not agre- tha thsy should be like the rest of the City. Chairman WNW stated they need to be" reviewed viand therms: should be a visual review of %e plMftd communities. . f Commissions e- 'Tolstay stated he felt the architecture is equal or even better outside the rit,�nne r`' !d conmmuni:ies. Mr, hielchev suggested as sincfk,it was a Terra Vista prmlect,ihat brought , this matter to the,Com lssion, he would like to offer to bring that project to Desigr Revivw for further discussion. He would also :bring along a summary with illustrations of what has been done to date. This E should be done in the saw, manner as the akrchiteetural workshop. Mr, Melchor stated they, ,too, old like to arrive at a number for the r' setbacks. Chairman Mciliel suggested a group tour to review, some of the projects would be eenicficial. He also suggested a visual review of the airtamuac Unit ;si :c l ce multi - fancily dwellings be dome alt the save time. I Ther,rlanning Commission agreed to set -� +dayf April 10, 19861, 10:00 a.m. for, their tour.oi multi - family setbacks within planned communities and the minimum unit size for multi - family dwellings, K. MINIMUM, UVT SIZE FOR 14ULTI- FAMILY DWEL x(210' - �N ty Council initiated s u tae size requirisael s for multi-family dwellings. Brad -Buller, City Planner, stated since ��m �\tonr for the aralti- fassiRy setbacks within planned communities and The (inimuma11nit sf: for multi - family dwellings will be coambined, staff Vii, 1 not 'to VAId up consideration of the lot size issue and will bring back a report on the lot size to the Commission ;,xithout the unit size for Multi- family r dwellings, L, Mr. Melchor pointed out that the staff report sVt6s that staff intends to, develop the informaV:z and bring the issue back to the Commissio %n April 13, 1988. Otto Krrutil, Deputy City Kanner, staged the report, slue Dour on April 10, 1988, would not be beought'back on April La J'A�8. Bract Buller City Fanner, stated the report on -the lot size would be " brought back- on April 13, 3,988. =� - 0. Planning Cowxf'ssion Minutes 14 - March 3,- 188 n M Nut POIOR ES AIV' .states. tham. S p _ r , /rid ' d,1 p t 'impra�nv p sir:!es. { Sented a QY i report,,, ' �n orrsation' an;4 suggested that the awards be fi on busi n*r . at this timre i srioner Totstoy, spCooded by Co*Ission ad, to adyovrn to the tMr"Kshop to discuss ` ign`ROViC Committee melting 0r, Thursday, , - I �nn_u3�,��.,a_ r L, �la� ra this ;ear acrd tits Est ne 'ire Caaaniss��- t ��'!4h agr � M. 1887 DESISH r ARD `PR Dan Coleman, SeniDr Plann The ComarMion rece$' t tg88 Ar.ards fq' Pro, -- 'There rva"� no furtE>i ►� tot ^- PUBLIC Ci w *= There were urd�ui6l�lc. cow /r Notion: �`;w�� .:. by ca Blakesley. uninfibusly, ci Winery Hiil Protect at March 17, 1'988 at F.CQ 9:45 D.m. - Mannino tam! Nut POIOR ES AIV' .states. tham. S p _ r , /rid ' d,1 p t 'impra�nv p sir:!es. { Sented a QY i report,,, ' �n orrsation' an;4 suggested that the awards be fi on busi n*r . at this timre i srioner Totstoy, spCooded by Co*Ission ad, to adyovrn to the tMr"Kshop to discuss ` ign`ROViC Committee melting 0r, Thursday, , - I �nn_u3�,��.,a_ ;:iTEH A l CITY' OF R.t�I�iCHQ CUCAMONGA r STAFF REPORT DATCs March 23, 1988 197,7 TO; Chairman and timber's of the Punning CoO#ssimn FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner,, BY: Beverv,x sseni, Assf4 rem Pianner Sf38+iCCT; TfJ4CT I15 2b D sIB�Y REVIEif - IiRIHAR DEYELOPftEld4' - Des #gr► reY ew o u ng a eHa Ons an plan for 23 single faar#iy. haMer. within , p!°eYiuttsly ah' oved ,iract acre icedotAi5tt ✓tsientisDistctSon at Beryl Street APIi: 1051 - 811- 12 -16y I061 -821 -3 "4i 6a g -22', I. PROJEMAMD SITV QESCRIPTjOW \ A. Actiom Reguested Approval of building elevation( anlat P ans. B. �µ -`j9t Densitjr .95 Willing „units per acra. C. Sur �ndin Land Use and Toni r - vacant; Op South South single family residential, VOy Law Density' Residential (lest than 2 dwelling units par acre). East - Vacant: Very Low Densit'v Residential Il"�ss than 2 dwelling ssrgts per acre). Best - Vacant.and single family residential ;Very Loa► Density Residential (Less than 2 dwelling Milts per acre). D. General Pla�n�i�si�n�atiot�s: - 0' ra -Y� sity, Residential (less than 2 dwelling units 4ferth'�+���- South - I Y Low Density Resdidential Vmss than 2- dwelling � -dhits per ;ere). Q East - Very Cow Density Residential (less that 2 dwelling unite. per acre) . West - Very Low Density Residential (less: -than 2'dwelljng units per acrd.) ;:iTEH A r, Plantming Cc�issian Staff Report TT 528 Marih ?3, 1988 Page .2 _. f 11. ANALYSIS: A. Central: CM July 27, 1983, Tract 10 11626 (a subdivison. oaf 82 Tats an 84.63 acrez' was reviewed and conditiormally approved by the Planning CoWlIsion. The- stroets and trails were cobstyiXted. 5ubsequi t to the tentative tract map approval, a design review for the developatnt of 8 single fammtily lots was reviewed and appproved by the Daziggnn Review Cooamittes (March 16, 1986) and the Planning Coimmmisfon fty,28, 19861. These 3 homes were never constructed. At 'this time the applicant, 8rfmaar Cevelopwnt, has submitted plans for developperat of 23 lots within the tract. Essentially four floor plans -are: being proposed ranging. in size fro m3,100 to 4,233 square feet. Plans 2 -4 are two story units, ilea Plan I 1 s a one story unit. Plan 1 has boo provided( seen (lames,. P140 ,2 six times, Plan 3 SIX timmme5 and Plain: 4 has been pro tided four times. For each ct ,the four floor plans the applicant is proposing three different elevations fr#tluding Wterranean, Tudor and Traditional IColoniaml sty'lesj�' The slopes within the area range from agproximroattly'�S to 1d" percent from north to south. We to this constraint, Iasi► was riaced on utili Ation of minimal grading techniq<�as in the previous It and design review approvals. 'faking taxis into consider form, the ,applicant is proposing aplit level pads which 7ifljorporamte the use of stem ways and raised foundation. Each Of the four Mars has both an "uphill" and a 1 "doanhi711/ scheme which can be located appropriately an either l lots or Wed in an uphill or downhill location. B. Gradl!! The Grading tooaittee reviewed the plain on February �) 79; A= and did not approve it due to the extensive aunt of graging proposed on certain lots. The I*ts in question were # j 72, 73, 43, 44, 81, 79 and 74. Extensive cut, high 211 ,(dams and the lack of fiat usable ya sPace wat Ui area of concern for lots 72, 13, 741 79 a�ndi11. Extensive fill( has been c Proposed for lot 43 which ar� an area of concern for the f� Coittee. The applicant revised the grading plan tr eliminate the majority of the 2h1 slopes by incdm�morating the use he retaining maafils and Higher stead wall$ an lots 72,E 73, r43, e",, 81„ 79 and 74. The grading scheme for lot. 43 remains the same as the oriinal proposal due to an .Engineering condition placed on the original tract map and do this design Review .(see Condition of Approval 3 -C). 0 E-11 Planning Commission Staff Report TT11626 Karch 23, 1488 Page 3 The revised grading plan was Prosen *red to the Grading C01041tee W, March 14, 1988 and was ca0c0tually approved at that Me. C. Des ' n Revs L'OWttee The Design Review Ct ittee (Chide&, er c �"' rrouu rev " the praao5al on lurch 3, 1988 and recommended approval subject to the folloving" items being breaght before the fall planning Commission: 1. An equestrian envelope should be, provided on each lot and shoul,o be a minims of 12 x 12 feet. The corral area should be af,essible to tho trail s s a :i "i 76 foot distance from adjacent sh a maintain e appli� ant has submitted an equestrian (The, Planning 0ivizio�h x+hich indicates c fdpe scheme to the condition of the Design Rev °Iew Commftt�l�nce with file above 2. A tine Of sight study should to be prepared which exayeines viewshed of existing residents on the south side es Alaond Street in relation to house plotting and overall of height of proposed drillings on the north side of Almond Street. This study should he presented to the full Commission. An addendum to this staff report should he Prepared analyzing its results. This will be made available to the Commission prior to the March 23 meeting. 3. The construction of comoUMV trails through lots A and ,,8 Conditions Nplacedaon thganriginalwTract ftp Design irReditw. developer to grade and construct the Coeeaunity Trail per. City' standard with each phase of development..." (See attached Resolut #ay 83.95). According to the recorded Tract Map 11625 the City Council did not accept the offar ` -bf an j open space dedication for lots A and -B and the Community; trail within it. However, the offer of dedication, stall exists. The Design Review Commi fWe recommended teat the Community Trails through Lots A and 8 be constr�;cted with this project. III, FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consiste t withthe Development I a�►e an a mere Plan, °she project "°lt not be detrimental to acent properties or cause significant environmental impacts, T, atAltion, the proposed use is Ir compliance with the applicable provisions of the Development Code and City standards. i IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Plan"ireg approve—IF E sign review of tots 37, 38, 40. 41, #3 -5a and 172 thnugh 82 of Tract 11626 through adoption of the attached Resotutio n with Conditions. l A RMUTIOH OF PLAm ir. COm missIoN OF m CITY of RANCHO CUCN*W. CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING l - taATIVE TRACT NAP No. 11626 L _ WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Naf! Me. 11626, hereinafter Oft" " suhsi#ted r by R. L. Sievers & Sons, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing tho tAI property situated in # City of Ranches Cuc a� County of � �rn&ino\ state of California, descrits� `as a custas ld,�- r`esid+ential subdivision, of' 86.53 acres of land into 62 "lots, regula�y cadre before the Planning Commission for public hearing and actin on dul, 1983; and r WHEREAS, the City lanner has recoomended� proval of the Map Sub jec ` to all coniltions set forth tit the Engiueerin�' and Planning Divisio reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commissiot has : read and considered the Engineering ard� .4ag Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. 0 1 14OW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of its City, of Rancho y 1 Cucaw4a does resolve as fallouts: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following fil ngs in„ ! regard to e—R ve Tract No. 11626 and the Map ,thereof: (a) The tentative - tract is consistent -with all applicable interim and proposed senaral and specific F plans; I (b) The design or`improre-ments of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed ge-ner &, ;and s fic plans; (C) The sl u is " cally suitable ftal�', the .type of develop,:.::: ' Proposed; 1 (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; ;, (e) The tentativ¢ tract is"not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at °large, mw of record, for access through or use the `�roper;y within the proposed subdivision. Resolution No. 83 -95— Paget �Z d9i '.nit an Envirom�vUl Upact Report has been prepared and certi €ied for this project white contains mitigation measures th(&,.r* duce Uipacts to �9 '!a'nt'i. an ittsignificatat SEC(" ON 2; tent;atl[4 Tra: Silo. :11626, a cotsy, ; 6f which is ', attached 'tea eTi7r%s hereby ap�� �su joct to, all of the foliowinq conditions and the attached Standard Conditions; PLAt IWJ DIVISION X. Recomendations by gleoieftic JW4 soils engineers shah be strlctly4dfiered to as !contained in the EIX and Addenduia 6aologic and fault Investigatiah (April 27, 1983). 2. A 75,fo4t to 154 foot building setback line fm habit( {ble structures shall be established from the Cucawnga Fault traces and shall be recorded on the final map. Thin, require ct may be subject to aQusUWt basest upon aajditional detailed geotech ical studies. 3. A So foot building setback ,line for habituble structures shall be- established from the WM ridge line on Tots 27 through 42, 82, and w4m, and f� , shall be recorded on the final soap. This requirement may be subject to adjustment based upon additional detaited,,studies. ea Proposed structures sha}� beedesigned to resit - seismic forces, in accol~daniM with the criterfa contained in the 1982 UnifAri Building Coda for Seismic zone 4. '� 5. A revised map shall be �bmitted whfti4 indicates a minimum front yard setback of alp meet. In addition, lots '13, 14, 15, 24 and 21 shall be revised to meet the minim= tot width,,of 90 feet C the front yard setback line. 6. A 15 foot equestrian easement shall be °provided on lot 23 to connect with the easement at the rear of. Tot 24. 7. A 34 foot strip shall be dedicated for er„erpency vehicle and a comanunity trail on the south side of leis 13 and 14 as shown on Exhibit "F "_. Resolution No. 83 -45 Page gn Al 01% , 76. In± h6ol•- f or 9. Existing trees (except citrus trees) shall be = = =: retained wh rover possible. proposed grading Or o individual Sts shall take into account the reed•for tree preservation. The Covenant$, Conditions and Restriction (CC&Rls) shall contain an awammss statement that existing trees shall Ita.•retained wherever possible, and that t*aval requires review and approval of a Tree Rmaovai Permit pureuan.A* the Tree Preservation Ordinance. ENGINEERING DIVISION (� • 10. An access easewt (minim= 401wide) shall he Iryfi� frca+ "E" Street through lot "A" to lot "8 "+ - i1, "E" S%�-eet right- ofawA}r shall be eQ��' tt with 28 - feet curb separation plus f -�soat i�questrian dedicataica along easterly righ*.of -way line. 12. °C" 'street .shall be rmn�tructed as 4 collector street 'with standard te4brary cul -de -sac. the right - of -wkv shad xtend to north Uract boundary. 13. `" k 'Dstreet a�a7 4be constructed as a col lector street from the injlersection with Beryl Street to the intersection with "C" Street:, .14. to lot "" shilV1 ResgWential lots that are adjacent A. ° hoe slope stabilizing devices ,installed -as recommended in `-EIR and subject to Planning ,the Commission revi&. 15. Lot "A" shall have a blanket offer of dedication for drainage easenent. ' 16. Lots 113, 14, 15, 41, 42, 43, 55, 56 and 57 shall have roiled entrances with a mid mum of 2 foot elevation above the flow line. - The front yards shall be graded tc�.�provide a positive barrier for the flood runoff jumping the curbs. Resolution No. 83 -95 Page 4 �... �, ■ A stom drain shall be installed in Oeryl Street fv\* "a' Street to AlWhd StrAAt and in Almond Str�%,et from Beryl Street east to the nate!ral dritnhage channel Can enwV disipatorr will bw- needy for the outlet), _V& pn atone drain in "0" Street shall be extinded tp lot 39 and the "st Time of lot AS, with dequate in at structures. 18.. Vacation',proceadings shall tie initiatdd to Vacate: Almond Sty.#:. thm '"cording, a ftrk-r i„ all be recorded C*in% lest *B" with the "Not a Part ": 19. All recommendations Am!* by t'* Ogot;Enical Engineering consultant will b "t., 20. All off-site d ainzge uasoments for St*rre drens shall be decicat4d to #* Gity concurtW&, -) eith the recoroation of the UP.' 21, The natural draiorsge course along the nest tract boundary shall be �1,leened of all ArtificlM fill and artificial drainage barriers to cdh drainage runoff from the tract. APPROVED AMS� ,,rl`Ea THIS 27TH DAY OF JULY, 1083. PLAN OMIdISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO,% A o BY ♦ �VY4! aAly rLT�wA.a� _ I, JACK LW,- Secretary -of the N7. mdfiq r.0Wtssion of the City of Rancho,, Cucamonga, do hereby that the foregoing Resolution was deny ald regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of tht City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the plePn'ng Cotesission hale, on the 270 day of July, 1983, by the folloi inq vote-to- t:.' -' AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, REMPEL, SARKER, JUAREZ, STOP' NOES: o COMISSIONERS: NONE A 4 SENT! COMMISSIONERS. NON ��,: e J) Ric to City Planner; replied that during the initia-� r o} w of the -' . propose staff detained that several areas needed f'urthtw study and F recommend th Punning Commis Tan require a focusel' Environmental Impact Rem for i ae project to research oaiti€ation n u °es. "Thee project, was then broug before the Ce ssion, at which time ®e Cowmissitrn agroed that certain are cneeded further study. Chalriwi Stout state at traffit, circulation ngrtEa,.of this "I+roJ 'was_.the subject of a graft dea f discussion - during the Cgnnii,Aon1s'AattU1 reviev and asked if this issued d )bE:en ad4rassed. ' Mr. Gomez replied that the cu'-de-sae at Vw rorthern part of the tract will , allow an opportunity for extent of circula'tioni deeds to the Ftoxthilis aeek ' above the tract. Chairman.,- Stout asked if the additions#, traffic from the Wrtly was t4 I nsidetled at the time the stateaent.,�as m4& that\Verryl cool - hanri!e tN additional traffic, Mr. Coleman replied that Ofs" was not spe fi•t °ally4iscusead in the EIR, (however based upon the uoteaga available for E3 ainar it l ,ri; ►at area, tra,�fi4 wouY not exceed Ewryl,'.s capac tyj Notion. Moved y el, seconded by Fi�NW unani us ;,�rrfrad, to adopt Resolution 83 -34 a rtifying the EnviroWental Impact apart for Tentative Tract 11626 asfpomplete. ; ' AYES: %r. C"ISSIONERSe REMPEL, MCNIEL, OMER ,]tJ(�fIEZ, STOUT NOES; CQ4MISSIONERSw NON "c :/i+i.. / ABSE�T: COMMISSIONERS: MINE ) wJ NY Ra E#6A 5ES MEtII`ADET7Cr 162fi ` IERS i custcn "? TAtA �n acres o 7 u v s cn o lots in the R- 1- 20,000 zone located on the south side of Bella Vi,!, tee5t of Carnelian - ApN 1061 - 221 -21. IN Clan Coleman, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report, vortmtissioner Barker referred to the Engineering conditions of the Resolution, aina asked what "slope stabilizird.devicesa meant in condition lT. a.' • F'aul Rougeau, SeniG.�' C vi l Engins�jr - ,rep�,'ied that. thOre is a wide selection of `r stabilizing devices Which ceulde e�,3d in the canyon, and the City could meet with the project's engineers to coM-'6p with thn befit stabilisers for that' area. Further, that it "would noi: be a completely concrete channel which would cause visual impacts, but something' -t-S# w, "1d fit into the natural env.irot -intq . Rlanning Commissi,oW Minuie; � 3 _ July 27, 983 4, Casissioner Roppe l stated that the runoff at that part of the`.canyon";s' not that great and, he would suggest not doina much �Tn the way of stabilizing, since it was already protected by netural vegatetion. Mr. Rougeau stated that further study would be conducted before anything was done and suggested that this could be Brought back to the CommA ssion for their ., review: Chatrman Stout asked if there was a reason why the runoff was not being channeled straight ftin Beryl and dumping it into Downs Channel, instead of .: turning at Almond. Mr. Rougeau replied that going straight down, Beryl is shorter route, requites less storia drain and does not require', ggini up the existing streets. 1 Chairman Stout opened the publf+ hearing. Robert Curtis, 9171 Camelia CoCrt* Rancho Cuc&4ngag addr+essv' Comaission asking if a trail would be provided so *Aat area residents c � !still get to the mountain areas. ? Dan Coleman replied that tivire is a cowunity tral -1 -that comes from the custom lox subdivision ' the west which will be continued along the north side of" the existing homes and go Through the project to the existing dirt road, vtnich will provide access to the mountain areas. Further that this project had been, reviewed by the Equestrian Trails, Fommittee, Mr. Curtis stated his cor.`e h wit"`rUnoff eo'liing down Beryl and asked if this i would be minimized. k Mr. Rougeau replied that. th ^.,street will covey mast of the drainage to the stonm drain facility, however. a min "imal amount of runoff would still surface drain onto Beryl There were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was c'_;.sed. Commissioner R el expressed his appreciation to the ap,.ricant. for' what they.; have done to make ahls project, in his opinion,, one of the nicest in the City. Cotrmissioner Barker stated that the`develepar had been agreeable ta.the suggestions of the Design Review Committee and staff to mitigate impacts. Further, that he considered this a sensitive area and would like to see the lot sizes larger to provide a transition Chairman Stout agreed with Commissioners Rempel and 'Barker anti stated the area is extremely sensitive due to the erosion - and seismicity. Further, that if the area has to be developed, Which is the right of the property owner, this F4tij2.c is one of the nicest to be foundi:. Planning Commission Minutes -� - July 27, 1983 y > Rlotion: 'Moved by McNial, seconded by RWel, "carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution 83-55 approving EnvirorimAtal Asse'simea and'Tentative Trxct 11825 with the axendWl ent to 'condition 14 to require that the slope stabilizing devices be m0iewad by the Planning commission, AYES! COMMISSIONERS XCHIEL9 REMPEL, BARKER, dUARE2, STOUT fi NOES: C"ISSIONERS; NONE ASSENT: CW0S,SIONERS: NONE cavrled- I J 8�lq. - Plaraing Commission Recessed 8.10 P, ,_ a ',I�lepning mission <k4convened Rids X, tv Plannarr, advised tat the following would be reviewed concurrently. I. VARIAXCE 83.0 BRIMAR oEVEL0 En- CORPOiRATIO 'to reduce the. requ re n mum of w. ' a ' AgUafe joo arge n' or#er to'subdivide a %,O2' acre parcel in the -1-20 OW zone located the sbath side of Bella Vista, west of Carne "ar, AA 10611 -22I-2 , J. ENY_IROWENTAL ASSESSMENT PARCEL 41P 8011 8RTMW nrvP agar • uXfuKAi 1UH A GIVISIon or. I.Q a es into Z parcels *1t�hin ,_ke ' r= r= au;Wzone located on the h side of Bella Vista, west of Carnelian - APN 106144E --�21. i Paul Rcugeau, Senior Civil Eng eer, revie" the staff report. He referred to Planning CommissI Deco? 'ion 79 -07, adopting tot City's Access t improvement Policy, which uires the dedicat aild improvements,jof a, private road to the /ncaNis public street. He advised that Elella- 'Vista is a very well maintdined o street, therefore staff did not feel that the regai. ement .or full tion to +Carnelian Street iou r�i be necessary, I M I owever would requirfer of deSica..ion. that the street would remain private intdined totally .by the property owners involved. He pointed out that er of dedfcatiol provides assurance that should ;li the surrounding property owners decide they v!ant the City "to toe over the street, the provisions for dedication for these parcels would exist.' He further stated the City has no intention in the foreseeable fut4re to tale over the street as it--,is adequate the way it is. Mr. Rcugeau also. stated that " the map has been reviewed Fey the Equestrian Committee which recommegded that v;;3 if a utility, easement exists along, the'east or"! wastpoperty line, equestrian easements sot uld be provided. t, Planning,Commission Minutes -5- July 27,'' 0 11 ' Y 1% ✓ � 4 ♦ ♦t V _ N�`7 ; CITY OF � t RANCM CUCAMONGA' TrrLEl. MANNING DIVE64 EXHIMT,,L" -/ SCALE. 'Y I Sk -tea `...•' („' .-._�2 C� _ "�:.."'.^h^'w..yr .% s Y cm• r P�i;,:',�iNING L iVWN EXHtMT= �. SC�,tLE t ri ,10 INI AP MY GF 1 � 9 { f�/ i i I � r _ 7 � ,,l D I E, r - -t , , CITY OF MMV J., t►i.�� CLUAiNIONGA TITLE _ M IN AT INK, -ANSM i - + +� \C`lD a ?� •�'_•`, ti r••'!�. n • -2 L 1 7 .* i +• II jtit� �'+f' 3 Y S1�_•]M�'�(1'i:L��Y1L YL1`� ... _.. ,`'�•� •4 Si Jul CITY Of o t C 1 "'R4 7 DIVNON ? a EXH T i G '--= �51 L E. {...— ..—..— AOL + .��4 + {, "e'+_n _l_e R� _ F ,jlG r'1�`♦ X�w�,(L is INZ im kN f V1 Y' nc~s "I "D CUCAMONGA TITLE 14-14 � P y � ` I: 4 rt c F� a r C'O`Y OF MAI' lfl v, c CIS OF ti NG LIVE ,t *I CITY CF RAN MANNING i I'E'LSit +F EXHIBIT- r� _ SCALE- :a IM U AML aTY OF �r 2 PLAN 1 r' EUNATIONlS CITY CF RANCHO CLQ��"K3A TnU- [ fI e Nov Q Rr,�R EGwc �ttan� t ' irf WIWI- EBCSNt L MM PLAN ELEVATIONS i RANCHO CLUk� ,4WA ri TITLE ~. .. R A.NNING ENVEM EXHIBIT...— ` " � LE • � c G _ , I I A/�� �© w: 7 ,fix nj � \� /�� pr oil ^ \ `���� r '171TY a AH OI 2VCCF O CUCAMC TITLE- PLA.NNM, DfVf�lr EXHIBIT; -SCALE, 1"A kl ,vr! • V 1p ..g o ` 1 `- �; r o. ! fj w r i � h r ` Y ` Ranches Cuc�on� held a meetin�'ito consider fife aPpl atiawd fiii i 1111 legal pr re uisites to the 44-, ti+tnt of this ,Re$*IU O I- naveoccurred. '� 1 U. W, T!lERGFAli4y *t ,Is lioftby iOo d, determinik and resolved P.i c' Plar ?ng Comission" ttf tie" CAV Of N#i ,, CUCAWnga a :followi: I. ,.This Copraision Ete %.�b V. spcifie111+ finds that al1`aF t #yo facts se. ¢orth in the Rec taj,e part A,' of this Rssolutf*&i are true ana carreet. ease« u ��� st!�i. p Untial evidance presente3 -to this C issiart durft:� the above- rq#erer ed mr LLfng an march Z3; i9 incy tding =kri ter and i F oral staff rep4rtsy -thr:> t` is* on heroby jpo,,Y lly f#nds as follows: J.' That `the proposed project ism � %istrtry, �e:th tits � f objectives it Al plan, 3t2 e , Thai: �a P'.fgplosed desi in` � is in accard wfia rre oSlective of tht,,Oevilo nt Code tnd'Me-2nd )ses Of th. district -fit uhich the _ite";S c4todR Arid G. That the i; Dowd desis,ri is its tompliancc w ;3i, each r, Of the app}tcab p ►� royi z�lk . of a 9, veTcp nt Codep end 0. That the propo �.ob �e e 'With e , = c�pditions apA!'idD -stll_ not e `imental to t Aafety, 01* lire, , 4,r nfxterially i�fdvesaents in toe vicinity. -%� °l� �, �� i �4 c RISOLLMOR 'MO. A RESOLUTION F UE RAWHID MCA, PLANRl1l10 COMMISRI�� ` APP TNG OECI6M `REVIEW FOR LOTS ? �8 40 .4f 04x: i ^JN3 :Rd OF rRliCi 11626 FOR pEVEt j P , F '. DWELLIW UiJTS PEP. ACME) QI$TRICP AC+N: 1081- W-12 -16 1 1OCI,, -UI -3, 4, C' 9-22 A. Recitals tva' BrWr Development has filed an applic Sion fo�v of -ass, aiew of tote 37 -SO ana 72 -gg of Tract too. �11C26 a a� d (i'i) On Mat-C 2 ; A o th.a Rl ; ±inM �fssion °41 the City of 0 aliyanCrei�� Ctmissioh Resolution Tft. p�tige "2 '' 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in ra�agrapEt 1 "R and abWei% - ,ComUsion,^here y approvesrvt a application sul,e�` gr each and every conditian y t forth b lox and in 'vts, attached Standard, rorlditions attachod heeeta +rg0 Terain ar t - ,!Orat by this reference. ,r aY Al' pertiwv» conditions of ResCIut-',on 83 -95 approving Tentat,x.;_Tract 1.626 hall mpply,.: G> f2i ter', 37,38, 40. 41, 43,, and SZ Shall have slopo sfablilizins devices "installed prfor_ is occea40cy { , relense. 'i'he desiln shah.l be appt'ofe c by the- qty ., ` Engineer ;" rio�c t�. the n building, pINits4,i ssuance� o gratfing ���cr 1 4 Lots 4,R and 43 shall have roll) I, entrances, ; rith sa neitii�{na of 2 il dot elevation Waya the flow like, d'r n as 4�prored City 'EnSf ear. The f }giant yards shalt #ra provide" i gw. 'stti've barrier for e fiQOd 4i 'r�a,as"it��? the curbs.. ►� " �� ; (4) All eaistf%g curii_ cuts along(Ahe lot. fivntagds that are not t3 be used as dri4ei,��= >a��a1�:' be �re:roved and ` r%�?_ 0/witft stanjd rd curb and utter4 r� tgp r" l extstfig tm;.ils Shall' U, irweaded and ,repaired as ne�l."essary ``► 01014 -ate e6siozii Vroblems. r _ (8) The; Gca�tu i"yy "riprithrtnagh Its A and 8 Iihal �.. cd6s4ruvt3 pr� to otctsprt 'Public Y�hdveaent =- Runs for this �:aatauni ahaii aesubmitted and aprproaed, prior to Cite, ssuan�e of building permits, (,o tft,_satisf'action f the 'City EVgino,%- and lite "rail Adv sot? Comitte+e, The t:�aii''des gn shall, idtlress the potential for erosion in" the area of tie channel. (1) Carry archttectura;' dettiIinI ar©lAd the" side elevations of each house, 4. 'The DePltty Secret&*Y to this CoWssiun shall 'lartt`y to the adoption of this Resolution. 11F' fippROV D AM ADOPTED VIS 23RD DAY C1t°'`WCH, 1988. . PUNNING COMISSION 0 THE Ci'KY OF RAWHO r1IP�AmoNGA Larry T. Mwe'r-.7153TRiff Ar - tniy�C►g n s' i i T� Jrnd �tuIIt tt��t�+� ' r�� uy of the M)np6ay rlstlon ����_ the City 6�0ir )Cho c "c r;ia, d# Aer*f certify than„ the foi eg i nq R4solmi -I'A Wk 9 41 " { u1 C�!v Intl*"". t i a5arx_:'r�UAdopted by �' *,Manning .Oa�i��s� r1 ,� Y "` �° 11 !�f � r in ?he 23c a� of ,a Che ��ar�rf ✓g ,ro �ssio�* r d i ,�.-. ,� �ai�' , � I� 'by �e fo'�totrg Cl ll i L r 4t 1, r A a ,s q� r �BSi +i p a�. ti tlg ggr _ ��_3' vxf i4y MY. yy 66 `yq� CM fit '►.O M y iy�.� MI a `" u I N fills h jVjjj (q ��/ p h•Y it .2 1e R. iii C w VVY ■p■ r ttti_YYY All, ..� !YVIX L (( !� :tee~. �� fp tt w:ar,o a RV: LL r4 w o dfi 4+. i .. .. K vp at In 6 IS 9-,I ? �m¢iF�g Win sa -8 I I IT,' 2 tilt, say; zv Mal Ift T &J$ p w AI i4 e: w p� p, .r fail s viV b ; V i 479 YS��1 �� !? 3� lis C, �M, w. k� NN f'tiy Ow^°��N e N,�U M �Aw �j" - 'a1 Vi Vii L�f.erN. ritl. OO WN N h O Oi `gip a3 Mai! g_� Ms ass: y7 (b, .Y".. T {off 1 is L 7'w Zak 131 u j,_rt�si a `�i . �a�j" o� � �' gy p .. x ..' iG li M p.Y.eYb qq W�++f ry �j$$yy U C � = C`+mCA wv� th+R NO �+r 47ti qu 3 aV,ii6 f_ g g va3�dS`€"d r ' Q ��e�Ny Va � QppK �� +��4'���� lLp"jf� �`L�O � YN •}Qi��wp. � 0�pp`�N� P� � �M �MVa. •E��Y�MJ IQ �Y Of i{apGfO��l� ipt ,S•Q� }0 � N�SN Q4. �C � NC,...' 'VN� �LL •Nq6 aN�'�.a �I �j ��, f'pY�•� g yt`'OR 1M S3�r •ic: «am iT w Yo'cNai is u��+�� .� . °�a� i y._1101.L _*2 S° $g3 ; fill Ps�s��. eta of kid ° gfS It a Il NJL t �L Nw . N O i t TM� _ I. �y���YYY� oTya�C u,� ��� �9 °�.lyKM�'.yyE •$y. ^�`t� ����y, � ,"s'�'.��. V, C �S UZ «.rd „!'¢Yr _N1� _ y3[ tt y %1j k,-•W J1 _ N N ■NL ® s�Mi ygi !. 1+1s 3 {��` .aq CF�mr IL Kt1 tb �. ii6M 6i ra Pit —fig {01 _ o '• Ly. §7 � M.71 ,y 3' I.GN o f y •7y q .� }a iCC$ css wa. r: �q�fi w ^$• i�l y L. YL'� A a ,t `L LN` � SwO Oy�A pW $ ; O9N C�. �Ni� np .�..as cye. p���'�� N Ny14Rpr Y� t71 � C aY� p°w� M C ..�NU � � Lp � w� ��r L/«{ NT• KN - ..Lf+tb ��• , ri MmwCy A i Mw • �Aw '�N�M�� G'�� �YY �`r{y� .. Q ^� �...Ni y q•i ow¢ V. iJ./ 'JM .� w 4�. N �.�gM NN Ys=+ 7' $« xL 4 h'N{■y ' griw. sNS pp'Y�yY w4L ,wG �.'.� »• aSV q3a m'n « 3P fn j h !,T +~rd` u 2; +a � '"= '.'"p1oXr`wY iGtN'� �eRp L W dMw ww O .iw N v '® My M 4N VV i N Np N N.�y °6 s ' Gpw ■v Y.. t 4; IS ♦ i` i1r. 06L NQ M w CI sMS Aa�K :✓ gN `. «�C •II 1. $w �NJ09 '�!pN� -N t�. Y�U'�.[.Cy �i (ti: R N �ti�V 1r K1 \y YL'»�yENA$ LVN�:Y } O 4�ip• ~O z -� Ii CiMN _ JNiiW 'tl S'1 C^ �.r. �h -� frddI aLLL nLN N�� S�� wwyAr�Yi - ^C:t�. �Y ” "•R� ¢ON r. - LY L 4 �S4 KYNp rc N.ar tafl vNr C.Y6`- R {�.{ `� I�oN..7 -i''O .a K YiW.pQ l N ' ail;.T1•1yN y 1 �s _ d u t ag � _ sa g � Mg- (Jf V g M4 t's, a.$° :'mss - :M v3� y�..' ii ojL I�¢` y3 1i•.a� ta4�iyi£rs A.. N��� ~..31 1� �'�� �� ^ tl M�M iY�yy�1• �Q!_�'bG «�+ �� ti�r/1ip{i +�Sb =>�a ^i, *,V all � yLiY ^yL ��� V��� ss e ^ � '. jyww W - MN fig' Q ,14 ;.,1414 4i 6 N U 2 w .. !y ♦ ^)V.tl _yy� .6N'y a� YLyy l`f t gGev .lt +M ^ Ye� Y T`a _ .... _wi': '!tint y *.. IL r7 1MF �1¢wT "" 1Y11. OY N� TL V_•S QY WN � .. 7��_Ct ay.. Oi✓� LS•+�w NY 4x .� �':l�a'U3 �Y_ � C.�� y� �6yw w�j VV �{ vv@ u V 4fn G Y q 7r sin N � ^ �..� ^�� ~.p p« �_ y�y� Ni..� _LA �'M �,S w�q•� St a 4Yl _ pp�� {�L�y -w�,,� �.. �(NYN `■■11 GPK� T �t'4'I1 GNNw `d MO V. � •� n CL CT. d yM.p. AL I- � 14K yy M 'J1�N-�;' ,r=GLp 1{t' -:5 i�MSYA 1i1M1=iVCp� yp Nil1 Yffi L.CN S{. Off' @h�V1 1V 'i�iG�i' k�KC 7 NN N� MI'••`if� Nv� O R1Y gror'i �i ••. 1T_ ,6 t •as ,Q Y .apti�- it C Y 1J {Yw KY -4 . E Q q�02 „ � !w4{�L � � Ytf. p� '.C� LaGp�, i.. G� 6 ^.t 1 •'Gt t�wpppw,,,... 1 *4 i 'STLS M� 2q� Y5 HIS os MN a°x_ r NM �`N p malts M gr R - �h . p. 't O v o" Z�`J S b 3N i..�y ^ SOt p l $t M Dw' k $ M.,F j J g 4 ti b. 8 I ; at $ lia � !! 4� .i N ® O w o_ "nom 4 rr "` N^ O l Sap. RL y�C��I �Q t! � ` CG '' i JI& �°• �Nj bi i81 �a � a '$J yNy��� t�dpiii V Y C��QN'Y { ■� �N P+i. M6��p �Y•'iu \.}$j�.i �i�V•� {YE.S o`�O ra, wro f. Cr` Yt�yjj7aa�{{ tli GG � gll 1pN� MW. bb O O! ' Or ,4r� RVyyj� �¢ t.� ° LN pq�jy y hM`,i pM .gx WM WVH 6 tO V62 Kw4 O yxif+nY le A 6 ^ m r i i+ +71 Ilp Qaa 'E 5,2 T g fa .Q � yy NN all al � A 6 ^ m r i i+ +71 yq�{`y�, PyyiyN�e o �. y Ji $ *O CC�Aw q.G ,�M[ CDC \,\ ~ JlLii y wy�. xVi n� 1Y{F Yom. E.� V CI.Y N {j L Z" A '. Y`f Y Ji *.tv L y •.r.. w waVi e O r Y r" pY'. y J SIX s ii Il yy2o_W. +i $w Ri'.ec. • cya. siO _1Ty Li, i 9OY�`" 3 w'lin,w °g �.~S«iwi{".ipa :..� +''.". mY C.. ' 3ioS ► w$ .3 sv dr w.+« rc'a a� 'c3�F;..cw° p� �' w1 -btl aQ.•i _ ' «w v 3'C 'uv a ° Jab ■c :F;pwo` is <3 LC1 NQ �'R tTN 9 OV. _L rY' ='.ow� 1. eW M i± •➢ f� YS e� N e .+014. j O v V we,µ Yp N .L a� I` L M AYe CveuC `O 6 i C 6 0.. er y a` fM. ei LK �' e9Nlpi� `a iS _ s a��.11 � 1 Ye =iy. C� 6-1 If j ur �7� ` Sk !_rYiiN N �� ;fir \. Y �, b �� / �i► � -y3 j iWj yN� l�`-- { ��rere a5 0.R ili ..r. C4 1'f M oz . 1 tr e�Na. 0 v g�� a e - V Y^ ±13gf ns g ego was o �e LOU r ,I 1! br'.w¢. � Ir pV 'E$ � Y b LM Cy's 8=Z ■g 'FYI O 3� tl C,•« $ Ny � y� fi QLiyLL�� I� Ym. d.� 61N IO0. KL E3ii Y: � y � f ym saw N� «yA q� �� .;.y n�, � rya - �.i�. Cp, !p_,..�. N »G 4NL `N VuV VVN p ^� L 1 Z. '�,�� r. C a� �6 ! a, .�.�. Y �`-c ^' v,�, _ nC w�V » 3 � ch O Y M ♦1y V,� yNN �few yywL Q ia ' V t 4A . i3 V f _ TI .Y Sri Y a`. =II T �n�' y p a iw �• 4 N L (, �'1 .0 _ I a � 04 Nom. t y --� --- --=r CITY & Tsi�iV`+CHO CUCAMONGr A St F ]REP T, x: _R � DATE: 23. 1988 I9." �0. ChM it and Motors of �t� a Planning Cowi3`sion FRft. ;grad. Mler, City Planner BY. 3reg ` qe, Assistant Plqoncr SUBJECT. ENVIRDNt &iL l ,i 'SSHENT FOR DEV i~ REVIEW '87-61 - ��' Ye �' development ,� opmen o ; a ware' ouse J• r ac ,totaling X7,,591 square feet aj} 3:r acres ofu /,� in,.the General Industrial 81strict prea 13) la;atcd on 0 � the west side of Rochester Avenue Cold), south of .6th Street • APR; 229- 26�,�7. i I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTI{N: E �.� A. Action Reautsted. Issuance of 2-�- tfve Declaration. B„ Surrounding Land Use and Zoni j Norti2 - Mon- conforming-, s en tali General Industrial (Subarea 13) South - =- kholesale Plant Nur ery; General Industrial, (Subarea 13Z East Vacant; Gene' 1 industrial (Subarea 13) Wiest - Yacantg Goner Industrial (Subarea '131 } C. General. Pian Designations: NF-534R.-Me ' General industrial Nort (-; General Industrial`` South' - General Industrial East - .General Industrial ` West - General Industrial D. Site Characteristics: The site is presently a vineyard, ' STOP ng u Ef't'y -- ,proximately 1 percent. tap ot<her -cant "" signifl v te' AtAs, on the site. Street improvem rK& 6 along Old Rochester Avenue will be completed with the project,, and half - street I rov(4-ents will be constructea-alor kefj Rochester Aienue frost 6th Street to the southern property boundary. o w 'LANiSMt ilssI SXrr , RcW,'.'' t 091 OPA TeTt march 23, INS s Page E. Park - Calculations: - l der of Miser of Types Squar* PaWng Spaces Spaces of Use AROt et Kati -sa R ired "Provided Office ,2 o 2 5Ci i Warehouse 4,831 * ita�sisouseisribution Parking Ratio; f r r#rst 2Q¢C squar* feet; - IIZOf�t) f second 20.000 ' ; rrk fist, and 1/M Tor everything oves:- 49,,OG5 � a►a feeet. 1 � iE. central: the prnet site is less �eharir ift frbdae . r± arx —'Me tS Frame to t%t east. , sib e t ` 'loading an'd' i' traeiler� ` E storage activity on site dill' � _ aide of the buildt e, ' "; scraest *g of the'7aadt09 and goragt area . .regrow view is x PprIfi vy toncern. To address' is irsus, an-,,s foot �. screen well is pr." *'wiled t�r't"d the 1+oeding atta, and ,, conditions have teen lViCluded ' to require Cose elvergr^aes�j. ' 1 1 %J plantings along thoL east and n0jih sides Of tire' ivaeierg areas. „ tiPon issuance of a Wgative lar4tied, they City planner will {�! N grasyt final approval Of Oar ptctb bised Kin conditions .: recoraslended by the Design and Teechjj,!,ai Revfet CoWitt¢t,$, I qsi n Review CoWfttea: r On February IS, 108, the Committee 'F EIi e ��.T elan reviewed the t 'T rercaeeeQe6 ed approval SIN �t to tl:e. : _. i. *11tional snandril giassS eitMents sold be $'"Oded to tier eastf.zn and western elevations, to upgrade the appeaA,4ncei of tl,e building along_ the street frontages, _ - 1�,♦ AL` ZWtvi wits ex r ���- t e, band ,could be provided aCmss 'ih2 tower portion' of the southern eteYati; t iq� a "stalxiislr a 4egree of cantjnuirjr betweenZt" 07er treatments. 3. iai& -growing eve M eens Should be- pro`itided at ' ?' approximately wen (10), feet on tinter within the " T: ndseape ease*-ont, along the ;,�`l Oem oraperty line tO en:5urs adegetate` SCre!'lrirug Of the loading area from, Oe 1.15 i:re "Ay. 1 / Fl.MNIC EkE1MT ti . pEYEC. RE9I �� }#3' ,6I ji• RIERS N Aarcti 2a, INS -'.Y�e ! _ 4. 'All, ove11*00 J "Is'` "should be panted to wtcfi primary building co,or. S. t4iit -levol HYAC system, ihould b1v u ad to aazirai�i>;e raof- aaountc equip`"t. M rw- mounted :Aystew is p±�os , di,taitEd fine•o a ° slgt4,� dada sold bR stetted f -q- ra U ; ensure that all woment gill be scfoggtd fkli public view, including, from the f;�e . J ;> C. Yeihnicatl Review Conaaittes,, - The Technical O.vi ;;xr ��itte* i P: R 4 - �rci of 4Fe�r ` -1&. IgA a* ' det! arml ted tlmt with .*coa�;ryade1 c�`onditions of apiarov�.1 the- project 'is ,tionsistefit with a►pplical ie City standards Ind I ordinances, o _ 0. Enviromental Assessment: w revierd, of Pant I of 'tF:e I tfnl u an caaap 7a€fic t 'o' cart II of tWDwironaae U7 Che 'Ast, , staff has foun4 n�,,significant etwirotitntal iaaawts rel" to w'ae -4 veloparr!c�.t � phis P�3ect'. ' III. FACTS FAR `-'.leis pro�i+a�"t is cansistent� with the iarAaztrfal�& apian', an�ic General , lan. 'Ihe [project �vdll not be det� � ieratar, to AQAa —iint p rtiljs or ci�vvse a siga►ificant er.Yi�r naaentdl lwea act. In ad�ion,, prcapased Cte Flan ar b"ildin� design, tether with the re« a c a�I tior$ approve , w l� cgWly with the irAmtriAl ZI.,w1 , P1en and ate" a�`►, ltcaablo City ,s atnd rd . r IV. REC041*VA IMi: s "f r�ecoaaaMOds st�aance of a .: !t!gavive ra b on or Cave :. ,*t Review 8741. = U Y Rasp sally 1submitted, _ Cir Pl n 't B�.0 i fi:te tr ? AttachB72isa xchib t "A� ; i.ocatiobn; �6r FxhiMt "P" > Site Plan 1� Exhibit "C" Building ElevW0114; _ 0701-02 � 3 -23 -88 PG Agenda 2. of, 6 msa ftKufto eaew.Ae ta,R. u,ugs„ Wmwv« +axewe A" ONUS tsom 08 O A" s* w we . m*mw. J 1 CITY OF �* p A a .TOA IUCA y h g—el( s �lft- oZc3ZQ,l :.tfiOZaZOZt�IQ► • p�...��.�� ®AU }': � a �' � il�imt�taYwririw � � TNLtiCyc... "�"(4tA +flLtiEi2 � ' \lt �• 4�CSL� A�L �...\ } .. r FM� /r�p�{IM�Yyp(Y -IIA• J A4nile�Y�Iw'IwR�ln � III �s _ i •xai+�Nil `fir �F l � �a%eoir•Yw �r � . t " i , w•arwuu• � ' 1 �RF7Al}!b r V• r � � i' Af/A�lMA�K.7M- ` 8fY¢�1Yr {'nj IY .1` : 1iOM�Y•Iw1NMiIw�1R i r LMDSCAM 1 M ;1 M b CAIBiRIGiiON GQ jt q ti k ,H I" C ^yam Iir�c• _ R. 97 :J K+Cii Ali \El'1G C,S, r� 50 .HI'�eAll�L���� G.�L �- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIVi0NGA 'TAFF REPORT FOATE: March 23, 1985 A �+ TO- "Chairman an n} hers of the planning Commission FROM: Brad 6tiller, Litiy Planner syt Bruce -Co(*,,' Associate Planner �i SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL-, ASSESSMEWT ltxl °EHEi," PLAN MENDKIE IT 87 -04G 'WARV DZYEi. request, Residential o as ena a nera aa5" "Erse dap rani La Mi dium e (4-8 dwelling units per. acre:) to Migft Residential (24 -30 dwelling units -e rker ,rcre) for 5.05 acr'a of land, located on the" south side of Bose Line, Road; west,of Archibald Avenue - APR: 90.031-18, 19.` EmvIRo AL ': ASSES NT m6 :. DEVELOPKa [DISTRICT 4, - vrewiUlt 0 amen e eve opMen x r c sspp " , Lv4- Medium, (44' dwelling units pe F acre) to High Residential (24 -30 dwelling units per,�jl;re) atta.-hed with the Senior 0 S in Overlay District, to the vase district foiS.s 1' acres of lard, located on the south side of Bass Lirse Road, Hest of Archibald a-_t�ue APR: 208- 031-13,. OEVEC OPMENT AGKE 87-62 - NOURSE ' DEVEL i4/ ,`- A eve opmen regimen e.ween , e a y o. , anc o ucan�onga and Hourse Development' for the purpost' of providing a Senior Housing Project per the re ireri nts of the SLaior Housing Overlay District (Section 17.20,040 - of;-�the Development Coda, Ordinance 211) for 170 apartment units~ to be located ovthe south side of Base, Line Road,, E�est of J Archibald Avenue . APR: i8- 031 -18, 19, j ENVIPONME1ff&:ASSESSME!#1' me GE% AL..P� AM °,�Hf� EKi`V.O4H af- revues 't - a�ae'"rid "t . e ari , Use l enren of e rGe-nerat plan from "- Low-Medi esidential (4 -8 dwelling units per, acre) to Office for -1. 9 acres of j land, located on. the west side of Ai^chi 1— 14nue, :south _ of Base Line 'Road -, APYz Zw 031 -17, 54, 55, 5E and 57. EgVIROMMERTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT __iffST_ ENV s requ�es n amen a -eve opi �z s r e s p from Law- E4edim Residential (4 -8 F,Jng units per 'acre) to Office Professional for 1.59 4cres of land, located on the west side of ,Archibald Amiue, south of Fuse Line Road - APR-. 208- 931 -17, $4, 95,` 56 and 97. � 4('A7EO PILES: ,DEYELOPMENT REVIEW 8743 " DEVELQMHT REVIEW 87 -34 ITEMS C.D,E,F,G' J PLANNI "" cO�lsWON STAFF REPORT WL,ST E INVESTMENTS /NOURSE DEVELOPMENT March 211. 1988 f4- Page 2 =.. lop I. ABSTRACT: The appi cani-s are proposing to develop the property immedia eiy to the west and to the south of the Baskin-Robbins center located at the southeaest corner of Base Line Road and Archibald »venue with a senior housing ciartment- proje-st and adjacent medical office facility.. The processing of this project has required the subMittal � *f seven different appiic4tions which are listed as follows.- 1. A mineral I PY,,r'Amendment 'to redesignate the senior housing v4'4 from , Lori -Nadia to High - .Density ' Resldenti ,ot (GPA 87 -04G), 2, A Development District Amend4mnt to ,,!plassify the senior housing site from Lew -*ilium to High Density Residential with a SHOD overlay, (ODA 87 -06), 3. A Development Agreement between the City and the senior i housing . project - developer `at, . rewired by the Development Code, (DA 67 -02),. 4. Development Rev4ew;87 -33, the'development plans for the stniar housing :�rrject site, S. A General Plan loendment to redesignate toe medical i office site from Low- Medium to Office, (GPA 6744H), 6.' A Development District Amendment to reclassify the Hme0cal office site from Low - Medium Residential to Office/Professional, (DDA 87 -000 and 7. Development Review 87 -34, the development plans for the medical office facility site. The Planning Commission initially reviewed the general Plan and Development District Amendments on September 23, 1987. At that time, the Planning Commmission indicated that they wanted to review all elements of the total project including - -�'the Development Agreement and Devel6rent'Reviews at a single time. Therefore, the Commission has issui i ,a number of continuances for the amendments pending the Development Agreement and the Development Reviews being ready to schedule for Commission reviews At the previous public hearing, the Planning Commission indicated support for the senior .housing project, h,ut expressed some reservations with de±iignating the Archibald site for office development. The Development Agreement between the City and „the senor housing project developer has been prepared. This Agreement is f e a 20 year period, restricts tenancy to individuals defined ":seniors" as (generally, people who are fifty -five (55) of ,years age or older), designates 50 percent of the rental units to be o '�LANUIK COM ISSYON_'•SPVF REPORT � WEST DO INVESMENTSIMURIrs DEY.EE,OMENT f Mrch Page 3 reserved for households whose 10=6 qualifies at this "low to modvraxte" income level as(< defined by the Development Code, and rentrAl rates on these desionatiQ units are -to be controlled at a level determined as a€fnr&F le eased on rents not to exceed 30 me percent of the dian `ono ,for San Bernardino County, The Development Reviews are ij4uded as part of this overall appiicution package but these pwific proposals'have been rloiGwed and analysed V staff under soparate cover. Rased on, site support for tits senior hot sin pro, *,ect indicated by the planning Com►sission at the Member 2 , 1W meting, staff ` has prepared Resolutions recnding to -the City Council appr,+aval of GPA 87 -045, IT4 8744, and DA 87 -02, N the other hand, with the Conwsfssion► expressed concern and lock` of consensus regGirding the medical office site, staff has submitted Resolutions recowwridiag both denial and approval for CPA 87 -04H and Da 87�' 06. The Cmission should consider acll material, and input regarding the *d1cal office site and the. rovida staff with direction as to the appropriate course of act on. If ft, =is the Commiss'IW!s decision to recom- nd approun'f of the office <. professional site, staff should be directed to prepare an amendment stipulating that the,senior pmje.:t can not be developed unless the office professional' project, off Archibald Avenge, is de *eloped prior to or, concurrent with the senior project', However, should the Development District Amendment for Office Professional designati -op be denied, the Dever - Agrent should be amended to stipulAte that the senior proj)kt can not be developed unless all rewired access and drainagg'iasemants for the senior project are obtained. r 11. BACKORDOFdi; The original prof :t appliaa{�t was TAC Development. Prior o e January 3, 13!88 publo: hearing, TAC informed the city that they were transferring salt risjtiwts and/Intorests in the proj t to Nest End lnvostments.. hest End 16yestments has just recently r informed the City that they are now transferring their ri hts'and interest in the senior housing pug_'- '�orr.,of the application GPA 87- 040, OVA 87-05, DA 87 -02) to Erturse 06velop nt. West End,wil remain as the project applica .for the medical office site (G ?A 87 -04}i DDA 87 -,66) Though th''re are nci two seuarate' project applicants, they have informed,,fthe City that they would still prefer these items to be cansid;,red in conjurction with each other as a singly. cr ri°hdnsive total (6velopment package. 111. ANALYSIS. A. Senior ffousln2 Pre ect: I. General Plan Amendment - The General Plan Amendment is o re es gna a ie senior- housing site (the 6.0S ages located on the south side of Base Line Road, adjacent to the west of the Baskin - Robbins center). from its a PLANNING Gflf ssiog STAFF nPo BEST END INVESTMENTS /NDURSE DEVELOPMENT March 23, � $ Page 4 1i D current signation of- Low - Medium Residential (4-8 dareliing per acre) to High Residential (24 -30 dwelling units per acre). This 8a�oral Plan AaKendrPent Is In conformance with Program 8.4 Of, the using Element of tl*ne General Plan in which it states that the City shall provide certain development istcentives, i.e. increased densities, for projects in which at least.26 percent of the twits are avi lable to loan and moderate income households. At thy- 'previous public hearing , (Sep amber 23, 13$7), the Planning Commission indicated a consensgp of support to approve this site for senior housing. 2. DeVeloPment District r' ndrwnt - This request 44! to c aas$ �:, e, sn d Of zosr ng ,of the, site front ' its current aeslgnat'" ;of Low<Mediumt Residential (4-8 dwelling units Poi acre) to High Residential (24-30 dwelling'unitslpQr acre) with a Sanior Housing Overlay District (S! ). If the Commission concur$ that the above- mentioned General Plan Amendment is appropriate, then the redesigns of t n of Development District from "Low-Medium Reside also then °bi; ial:* to "High .Rt,�f ontialy would necessary to maintain to consis -tency of zoning to the General Plan, as 'is required <oy State\ Law.: Also, the SHAD overlay is addiOAnal7y �in1 added- to the land use classification. '' This "S!R!D zoning would earmark the site f+or . a senior hospaing project only, and would prtclude the site being developed with anything: other than a senior housing project. The project -cite does Wet the necessary preconditions required by :Section.;24.D40 -D of the Development Code as prerequisites that must be present for the site to be considered fccr a senior housing ppr)oject (see attachments for P ppy of Section 17.20.040- 3. Development Agreement - Tate Development ii pment Agreer�r�t nen ey anand the senior housing project developer has been prepared, as required by the f� Development Code. The Development Agreemept is'' a contractual agreement between the City and the developer that has as its function the implementation of the required development standards and amenities for a senior housing project. A copy of the Development Agreement has been included in the attactnts Ar the Commissions review. The basic deal points of the Development Agreement are summarized as followst" p PLMNIWx 47VnEuEMTS1W0ilia Sr i! REPP.Ri �1 NEaT END SEMarch 23,18 page 5 f a. the A9010MV will Jrovide 17V apartment nt units for target tenants , Lr, spaior, citizens who" are 55 ',Years of sge or 'zrrdar�,`� th Certain exceptiol�& as contaihdd wit?in'the Agreament, b: FMY percent I50si of the units wiiT be targeted for" residents who met the iainiarmr income qualificai, #p s, i.o, their incemeW do not i exceed 8, percent of the median income for i traons oi, couples within "th+s . Gottrrty of Sar. Bernardino as currently defined by the Feral r ,D*p4rti*nt'bf W,10, t and af"n Development. C. Rents on t4se ',crget units will be restricted where the 11 is charged to residents will not 'tics 30 p: rcent of this 80 per�ent income d. The term of ,s a9roamt roilT be for a 20 YfMr period. After ,the QeYa,Totfknt Agr ement expires, the property i \ no I' er bound, by the terms of th�,,Sgre ant. r {waver, If the `rote -4 is to use housiproperty far` anything other than senior a Develd grant District Mandeent would %ir'stMhave to be aIlliedd for at;,tha „inclusion” of Std In the zon1vig Of the property restr -cts pe Itted uses to i,'4t far ,.senior housing only, At the mutual consent of both the City and the ps~aper*Y owner, th*t; terms of the Development Agreement can be i,xooded beyond this 20 gear period~ In exchange for the dettetopltr providing this affordable a arousing for the targeted. sq%,nior group, thfr,City has agreed to provide the following development �..*tives a, In order to raaximfle the Hilt yield per acre;' the City will penait xn increased project density with a combination of granting a change in the J/ range (the General Man and Development I, District Men,-%entsl, and a density bonus to allOW a flat yield, of 35,03 t+nits to the acre resulting ;ercent density in rease'above I the amanded'44iral Plan designation, and a 338 percent density Increase above, the current General Plan designation. J " CDC :�' ti �j P;.A'tiitiIK CWMISSIOk 5T.`.P',F REPORT iiESt END Ih1ESTMEiiIiS /li1RSE DEVELOPMENT March 23, 1988 Page 6 2 r b. A reduction in the rQluired om -,site p4lrking standard will be grated to a ratio of t non - covered parking space per unit, ao fee waivers or reductions or any other hype of direct financial contribution by the City is being propose# as a part'.,of this Development Agreewnt, 4. Dovetow�nt��----Review - Included as park: of the total develoo is the Develo*nt `iteview for the site development of the, ;±enior housinit site (QR 89- 331. The approval Development Review wi'�1 be incorporated by reference as an exhibit as past Of the Development `Agreement, to requira than' the -site be developed to those approved stanftrds. q The, iss4s of open space witj# sfte development of the teneor project has been analyzed by stiff as part of the Deveiepwat Review staff report. The ultimate resolution of issue should then be incorporated into 'the appiroved development plans and /or conditions of ap#roval. This-,,'. element will then autcwaticall;/ hecome art of the DeveluPMOnt Agreement as revised OR J -31 will be incorporated by reference into the Oevel lent Agreement. y B. Medical Office Sine: I.' ieneral Plan Aaendment The General Plan.Aftndment Is o r esed` agnate "the,'proposed medical offtca site (the 2.69 acres located on the west side of kchibold, adjacent to the south of the Baskin- Rt>kins center.} from Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelliiV' units p;r acre) to Oifie for a planned 22,460 square., foot medical office facility. 1b Planning Commi;Ssion initially 4eviewed this request at the Sep* er .23, i 3987 public hearing. Though no consen'A ". was reached, the Planning 0ommission, at that` time, expressed concek with designating additional office use at th t Archibald/Base Line intersection. The concerns were, that there was already sufficient conaaercial and ofAce. use at this intersection and more was not needed, and that by increasing the poteltial intensVtty of land use at this site with the redesignation from r'es.dxntial.to office would result in undesirable traffic #pacts to the street circulation syste+�. In consideration of the expressed traffic concernshr,�Cse staff has consulted with Traffic Engineering in re 'gin this issue. In comparing the 1.69 acre+ devolooed with the proposed 22,400 square feet of. medical Ofice with :9 residential duelling units that could be expected under 2 r PLAHWIW CtllA OMIION STAFF REPORT W$$i El jN�►E�NiS /NWASE DEVELOPMENT` March 23; 498ff Page 1 j present General Nlan/Developaent District class7fication, 90 ADT's wculd bo generated with the residential use versus b�tween9UO and 1,050 with the medical dffice development. Aiie the .medical office !' Zcility would generate significantly pore traffic, it expected that this traffic would be distributed oughout the course of the day" and not concentrated at peak hours. Therefore, it is not expected that the medical office facility would result in traffic impsjtc j that would significantly alter or change the flow, of � traffic aft o�,Archibald Avenue., I i Since no clear direction tsar indicated by the Kanning Commission at the firs'): public hearing, staff has prepared Resolutions recownd:ng both denial 'and r ' proval for the General Plan A mendwapt. . The -imission should, consider all,mterial and input, and provide staff with direction as to thti, appv6priate r course of action. If the Planning CoWssion concurs with staff's findings, then adoption of the attached t Resolution wood bt: the appropriate bourse of action. If it is the t6ov fission's decis�on to recommend approval of the�� radical office site, staff, vould recommend to the CwWssion to direct that the Development Agreerint be amended to include provisions vsstricting deve'lcplrtnt of the medical office site to spproved plans only and phase development such than the medical office!,-xRxy.lwy may only be constructed concurrent with nr subsequent to, but not prior to, the senigr housing pro$ect. 2. Deve lopment District Amendment - This reg4est is to reclassify " -=e jand use won ng of }.he site from its current design4tion of Low4fodizmr Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Office /Professional tr; permit development of the medical office facility. As with the'' above - mentioned Genera" Plan ,Amendment, staff has also prepared two R"OTutions for the Development District Amendment, one= recommending denial and one recommending approval. Whatever is the Commission's direction regarding the General Plain Mendpment should be the similar direction for the DOA to maintain the required consistency between the General Pla€w and, zoning. 3. Development Review Included as part of the total AOL veiopmen pac age is the Development Review for site development of the medical office facility (OR 8i 34). The Development Review has been reviewed and analyzed by staff under separate cover. PLANNING GL"ltISSION. STAFF REPORT WEST EW WISTRENTSIMO i.RSE DEVELOPMENT March 23, 1588 Page 8 IV. ENVIRO!MEAL ASSESSWRT.- mart I of the Erivironm&ntal Checklist as submitted-- Ay`Uie applicant, Staff. has completed Part II AK -U-0 of the Ertv�ironsaenta'I "U%n cOmPletion of the Initial Sttrily, StuffF;has found no adverse iPpacts qn the environment as ae result of the propostid projects, and reco"Ond% the issuance of a F Negative Declaration. Y. FACTS FOR BINDINGS: In order for the' Planning Comotstion to recommend approval of these projects, they aw;st find the following: 1, That tl;ase piVects are consistent with the land use �polictes, of the General Plan, C 2. That these prajtcts wound be in the best interest of the .health, safety, and .welfare of the'' citizens of Rancho Cucamonga, and 3. That these �nrojects rvuld not vesttlt in any significant' adverse. i acts to persons and pnVert:y in the vicinity of t[.e Prooept site. VI. CORRESPOiiDEitx:LS chase items have beets advertised in The Daily -as w�or news paper a public Fearing1!�!'-w, all property owners 300 Beet of tl' a project site were sent direct mail 'putrlic�' hearing notice:; and thr prop Wis pasted with a 4 x 8 notification sign per the city's suppYemettal noticing requirements (these it have been re- advertised and ,p- noticed for the March ' -" X23, 1988 public hearings VII. RELC ErJATI0,%' Staff recommends that the I'llanttin g Commission orwar City Council Resolut`.ions recommending approval of the senior houstny Project (SPA 87 -046, Du`.� 87 -OS, and lea 87412) for the reasons stated cat the Resolutions. Staff also rec%0,ends that, �'Ie Commission provide staff with direction as to t,,±e 8,pO4H,�DDA 8TH- 06).of Resolutions for oth approval office ntidenial have been included for the Co missfon's rev'ew and consideration. With Commission concurrence, adoption of the appli._ ,ible . atta0ed Resolutions would then be appropriate, \V .. „ PLANNING C %5.5i VAFi: REPORT page= 9 ; i Re` ful s an 88QBCae' - �, Attachments: hibit IWO » vid"Ity Kip - Witin� SWoral planfzoniny ":' ��; Exhibit %".lu Existfng;Land Use - Senior Housiq Exhthit C - ` ostin� 'hand Use � Me(fical Uiffice Ext �3t D« �t sed 5fte plan Section 17.20, `yD of 'the;Jkveiopwt Code Pla""Ing Cowsslon ki"UU4 of Sys ;sr 23,- 1987 'Mission Staff Report of 8ept�bar 23, 29$7 5eni�dr- 3�usfi��p , Planning C tssf" Staff Report of SOpteeeber 25, "1987 or medical , Office, - rw ResalUtie of Approvj; ; - GPA 87 -046 Resolution of Appravall - DDA $7 -05 Resolution of Approval - ox $7 -02 With Attached 00101OPWt Agreement r ; Resolution of Approval - GpA 87-04H f Resolution Of menial - SPA 87-04H Resolution of Approval . tWA 83 -06 Resolution of genial f ff ,�� C1 i t! i 4, �) 1 )J f H IiI' OF ITF -Nt: �� cqw RANCHO CUCkNIONGA PLANNING DWSION CpEF6�ItT LYNIr-4i' =�.,..A.— ,j,f.. AI�CM�ALD a..� • #••* a•rt•■ ae•s �.• a••a;.1� t•tte�e •a • eva#rest ae ► • a i -tie�a a {a �taktrt• lafrateaaa ••aM��•e• eea•aa {aaer t a • { aksaat {tat �' - • a t t ••.��# t i a# •• a'. ateaa ;rto¢R ,l t•faa t ♦ GanaraPiMae► :•:• aaeaa• •,ja��.. ae►rasetat s a Me�� �.a ♦!s•�yr a�F ia> - t /a. t.} •:•.• :..,a ... tt ealaM gay i i i• i r � i a t f a a *to !4 #u�i- ii• a• #a!a �•os ' a t. a•a. s• � ••a•f, asa♦ ♦ eiioiii aaa•a. i ••a. �rt *• iti .teaa .. e�� •se to a t #•e a. o� ... {a•ta•• • a:: •a•a ll • • wwa, 4 M • `l *�•a• ♦at iii - _. RASlumf . ■• • {t�erte�faa♦ �bai {aaa i� • #lt Mtfaa to .. _ � �• • «altar OG4 0 a'r'�t',ai {'�aMaa4 aattaea Da # {40 � A • t t • a• a• a a e Y f �a�a�a�aAa� • aatrti. •is ,w a +s .• eat i.Aa �(s a•♦f •ia�aiaa•ea�f ♦ta.arel� rr:;: :::: r tta tartaaa kalt.M ff {!tt f 1 a a{ e •. aawraaaa •fi •• a * a,�aaat•.aaae eegoosw MD ea "r�4te{Mateea - a•t•a a�n�a. a " -a {ttay♦ a {a! «e !• {etirlae.•a! •aeatae Atte {f ,. - • @ t t +F•ai rt f f !el teeeeset {4 DevOlopment DIRlrlctt Nc Nc U. c CITY CE OV ITEM: _ C� iYI.`l'LS 1..73r�lSK)LV G.1l�IC2y ;: �7lrALF..— 61, ..;..:. .acts t$4w atr. t+hR.a. W 1119MIUMU w ue Zervea oy tne.. units constructed through we of incentives offered as part of the senior Housing Overlay District we senior citizens who meet the tollowft criteria: (a) For 'tenants, residents, or occupants who are married t6 Gaa, h other, either spouse shall be fifty-live (55) years of age or older. (b) F4ir individuals who are not married, each individual shall be fifty -five (50 yea3 of ft* cc older, (c) In addition to the age.: restrictions scat forth, In subW&paphe 4, and b. 4bove, Any individual M !narristi couple who wish 10 occupy or reside in the 'Projeof shell hatve &V4' maintain an 2:a1 insane tram aril sources eggai to orlon 1'aan eighty percent (1096) of the m adifta 1ACAM0 for personn or cc;agles within the County of San Bernardino sm, ourrasntiv de;iOd by -.no Fedsrai Department of Housing and D'rbata Davulopr� ant. ,; 0. AP al:tcability The Sen,kc llozzing Overlay District requirass thak -- pretsnca of certain —conditions brcare it cot be applied for or attached to a specific; PVC41 o! tend. In oF*,r 1 � tida gtaly and s!%tisfactarily serve the Urgst ;Opt latiort than this Disfs, 4.- nas 'bs sn crested to serve, any p�opased project ulna ,mutt demonstrate the Mowing conditions and foatures: I. Appropriate basal district zoning. 2. Lewd uses its the immediate sad surrounding area, current and proj:ectvI, must be Compatible with tho living environment required by senior citizens and most be free of hiealth, safety, cc_noise problems (he., Area generally quite). 3. Area infrtstrucUre must be in place or eonhtructed as wt of the proieoj . and s:9pablo, of serving the.gaposeaf project including: I r_ (a) strt6ts � (t�) si owalks (c) traificlpedustri�tn signals a. Proposed site top;paphy must be fairly level and eaRiIy tc'aanvetse4 by persore of limited mobility. i 5. a ropassd site must demonstrate pr*O)d m�, �ty to commercial establisnmena, I service Q:uviders, and other amenities incil ding: (a) food shopping (b) drug stores f (c) banks € (d) medics! and dental faciilities (e), public transit (main or frequently secvac� ccautes) (f) open space /recreational facilities i ,r Miki Bratt, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report. Commissioner Tolstay questioned the dispo %ition of the small triangular piece next to the freeway. He felt this could be a good design elaesnt , of the project. Scott Murphy, Associate P11enner, responded to the question stating this is floc- control now and hRve not received a res,7,nse from the district stating the disposition. Chairman McNiel opened the 'public hearing. Mr. Craig Page, representing Ahmanson Development, 2361 El Torro Road, El Torro, stated there was one correction of the staff report. He .clarified they are proposing the aeinie" lot size as 7200 square and not 7504 Square feet "as stated in the staff report, They are otherwise in agreamenx with the staff report and cannot respond to the essestion of the disposition of the trisngu'lar piece. Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. .0miz: Jner Tolstoy moved to approve the Gilleral. Plan Amendment, Commissioner Blakesley seconded the motion,. Motion carried by the '4110wing vote. AYES: C"ISSIONERS TOLSTOY, BWES">EY, CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS; MORE ABSENT: COK41SSIONERS: NONE carried I' Commissioner Chitiea moved to approve the D�delopment District Amendment, Comissioner Tolstoy seconded the motion. Motion carried Qy the following vottp: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, TOLSTOY, BLAKESLEY, EMERICK, MCNIEL NOES: COMlMISSIONOS; NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - =tarried I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSKE -AT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 8f -O G - TAC `t l3E0fL�'- request `enera ar: a se u rnt , (� ow- uam Residential A4.8 dwelling units per acre? top High Residential 124 -30 e" -11'B n8 units per �..r ' for 5.05 aeOes of land, located on the south side of Base Line Road -, west of Archibald - APW �° �i 208431 -18, 19. P Anning Commission *nutes -7- .,September 23, 1987 Ask ENVIROWWAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPWAT DISTR AMEWMENT 87 -05 - re4ue4 Mn a, Tne ', opmen s r & s m4p row ow-Wdiuie Residential: [4-$ dwelling units per acre) to High Widential (24-34 dt+*1-J- :a.'units per mwe) attacinzd with the Senior m asing overlay Distrj�x# (38�1s'�' to ache_ base district for 5,05 acres of land, lorsted on'`the souf- sida of Base Line Road, west of Archibald Avekte - APN 20x1.031fy 8, 12. J. EUIRO1Ml.NTAL ASSESSI9EUT MD GENERAL PLAN AW.M)MEXT 87 -04H - TAC D= r#qWst to W953 a se even or, tne General an Tr oe ow- Mardium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) to Office for 1.64 acres of land, io„ated on than west side of Archibald Avenue, s00th -of Base Line Road - AP9 208- 031 -17,, 04, 55, 56 and: 6T. ENVIRONNE N7Al. ASSESSMENT t W DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 87 -06 - i�rom 'iiegidential (4 -8 dwelling units j4r acre) to offic Professional for 1,69 acres of land, located on, the west side of Archibald Avenue, �o th of Base Line Road AP9 ,248- 031 -17, 54, 55, 56, arA 57. Otto Erdutili, Deputy City Planner, presented the combinsid staff report & - 0aimean McKlel opened the public Wring. Mr. Alan Oalmau, PiUsei- Delman Architects, 9; 0 0aven Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, stated they feel they have met with staff re:ow*ndations and would like Commission's convents to complete the pre>t.t�ss. Mr. Harman Rewapel, 9-SOS Saw Line Road, Rancho CucaK n9a, %tated he did have a problem with tba saanior housing but does have a problem with the office complex adjacent to the senior project if they are giiing to have a shared acdesai. This will create traffic problems. No also stated his concerns with the office complex being on Archit ld. Mr. Dave Pet< rs, 7422 Archibald," Ratacho Cucamonga, stated his property, is next to f is grodert and his primary concern is what type of waster flow and floird e:ontrol provisions are being pursued. Mr. Tim N*"ck, Civil Cngineer for the project, veriir#;u that the draina S exit out onto Archibald Avser±ue. The property ge qtly drains oa toofard ;Archibald and thoy .don't .anticipate any big,,, difference a grade 44twoon their situ and. Mr. Peters' property. ;Mere could be a ilwo foot dIfforence in grad4 to ;accommodate driveways. Mr. Pete Pi;kassi, Pitas >i- Oalaau Ara:htecss, 9140 Maven Avenne, Rancho i Cucamonga, Atated regarding the grading they anticipated lowering the G northern U shaped building lower than Baseline and. then the middle 6 portion of�the projVL is 2 1 }2 feet lower than that, and then the southern U- shaped Vu,,Ang an additional 2 1/2 feet lower than that. Plannik3 Commission Minutes W8- September 230 1987 + iI Their grading analysis analysis indicates there would approximately two feet of fill that would slope down the property line and the.drainsge would be hand`10,with either a swale or a retaining wall in addition to a garden wall UA would separate the project from the property to the south. The intended use is a medical OLYVice t,�ullding, 26,0oo square feet, and it is integral to the project as 'a whole anal cWVlim*R#' each other. Traffic could pull into the property off Sasetine and exit onto Archibald and it•'is: the intent to link the pr=oject not only with Pedestrian access but also with vehicular access. There will be a substantial grade point at the point too, Chairman McNiel closed the public Fearing. Commissioner Cnitiea stated that the senior project, is an appropriate one and the idea of having low rents &vailable wouf3:�,be appropriate. A medical facility adjacent is appropriate also. The',�irculanon throv6r both projects is iaprar ttaaht to discuss. Reespondin -, to .;Mr, Rempei s com9ents, she questioned whether pedestrian circulation is what the CisSion is looking for or actually linking traffic ,hrough and what would be the ropercussi�t�,F, of doing so. 'She would 1Vike to see more Specific information re ing the water flow d€nta AI tCibald at this. location. Mr.` Peters does have a lsgitimAte concern as this would be a substantial area of land draining onto his property.. Onceptually, she likes the idea of linking the two projects in span a�nnrar, A senior project in this location might be appropriate. CoI'-;ioner Tolstoy stated the Water situetion would hove to be ten'l care when they bring in the site plan for Design Review ar,d thinks the senior project is a good one there. The surroundir.�! retail centers are there to serve people who are not able to drive arofffeels this is a good use for this piece of property,, He is concerned with the General Plan Amendment which changes residential 'property to the office designation. Chaii'aan McNiel stated there are going to be Many arore a for senior projects. Associated with most se :there projects, there will not be space for medical Office and frtA his'` point; -'If -view, Commission should take a good look at what is being proposed. Chairman McNiel a;; mw thd,,�Wffc hearing. Mr. Terry & .0%ristensen, TAC Development, psment stated that there is interest by area dt cors to move into the medical office complex„ He felt the seniors would do;bett -Ir rntering and exiting on Bast "tine where the traffic is less. Mr. Herman Rempel, forgoer Planning Commissioner, stated there is a need for some We of facility for people who need medical care. This driveway O real back ups and so does the driveway on Archibald so that a left turn in to the project would be a problem. A convalescent home is a good use to tie in with the senior housing project. Ms. Wilma Brenner, speaking on behalf of area senior citizens, stated a convalescent home, in this location would not be aporoer,3r, e = Planning Commission Min'u'tes September 23, 1987 commted that i atdical office complex adjacent is appropriate to the senior housing project. Senior citizens like .seething close, they can walk to and be close. Nor*, and more seniors are ..�^vinr but,,this direction from Los Angeles and Orange County since ;ere are ��oft fire freedoms in this area,. This facility would be great to gave adjacent to the senior housing project. Cemmmissig0tr Chitiea stated she would like to see this project Continue and the vossibllity of working nut somoe of the issues addressed in discussion. Commissioner Blakesley stated his ca'"Carrls with the intensity of uses in this area, all of tho commercial a,nd,t* traffic, This project will see traffic problem, ingress and eg4zs, no matter what direction' it faces. The beat use for this -Varc 1 from U Point a r.�...�,, �; .r.�. S .�i#i iiss' pr`vFS�6�a?t� +iFttd� would be residential. Commissioner Tolstoy stated he could ;lot support item c'Jsinca there is just too much office. Commissioner Emerick questionmd how MAY seniors coula support the medical facility complex and this particgl,,)r intersection already has extremely heavy traffic congestion. He, 'tmrls7? office generates more traffic Congestion. l Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Commissioner Chita ' mroved to continua Item Y to the October 28, 1987 meeting, CommtZsi'6ner BTakeslay seconded the mmetip. Motion carried by the following irote AYES: C0 ISSIONERS: CHITIEA, BLAKESLE , EW.RICK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NGES: C!iAMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COWISSIONERS: NONE CO=issiOHr Chitiea moved to con nue Item to the October 28, 1987 meeting, Chairman Mchiel seconded((tthe motion. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, BLAKESLEY, TOLSTOY ) NOES: COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK_ ABSENT: COKNISSI?NERS- NONE 0 Commissioner Emrerick clarified his no votf for the reasons stated in text. Cl4pe' -/q --cirri sa Planning COMission Minutes •t0- September 23, 1987 DATE, TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT September 23, 19$7 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Miki Bratt, Assistant Planner' �LAVIROWMEWTAL AS 3E39ENl' AND '6ME.RAL PUN N ERWENT 87 -M JACDE i.B rep 0s o ARMa the Hera Plan Lana use p N "ras°'C,o�r ,_;,, m Residential dwelling units per acre) to,.,righ Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre) for 5.05 acres of land located on the south side of Base- Line Road, west of Archibald - APN:_ 208 - 031 -18, 19. pE' 91_DF�iEN1' DISTRICT AFlE1 MENT 81,05 TAC OEYE+iiWEI'! - A request to amend the Development istricrs p from ow- Medium Residential i4-8 Willing units per acre) to Hies Residential i24-30 dwelling units per acre) attached with the Senior Housing Overlay District (SHOD) to the base district for 5.05 acres of land located an the south side of Base tine Road, west of Archibald Avenue APN: 208- 031 -18, 19. I. ABSTRACT: The applicant has submitted a development proposal under the Senior Housing Overlay District (SHOT!) of the Development Code. The submittal packagg includes a request for a 0�5velopmmlent, i Agreement, for a General Plan Amendment, for a Development District Amendment and an application for project approval of a 170 unit senior housing project on b.5 gross acres of land and approval of a related project, of an adjacent 8,150 square foot medical office/ building on 1:89 gross acres of land. Because the General Pla land use change from Low - Medium Density to High Density depends the use of the site for Senior Housing, approval of the Develo Agreement must be concurrent with approval for the General an Amendment and Development District Amendmaents. At this ti trt �the Development Agreement has not been- finalized, Also, the pr6j`ect design and site plan are being reviewed. It is anticipated that the Development Agreement and project review will be cnmpleted,'by October 28, 1987. Therefore, the Planning COMission is requested to hold a public hearing for preliminary review and CoMent or. the ..entire package and to continue the pubiic heaving to October 28, 1987 for final recommendation to the City Coum 1. PLANNING't"ISSI STAFF REPORT GPA 87 -04G 8 DDA 87 -05 - TIC DEVELQPMUT CORPORATION Septellrber 23,-,1997 Page 2 _ r II. BACKGROUND: a BACKGe"`l" : The Pplfcant is requesting a General Plan Amendment, p+a*tnC O' strict Anrene ent .and aPprov0 of separate C applications for the senior agar wAnt Project and an off'�ce medical C �rrsjstt, the applicant is proposing to build affordalplte housing 4 under the Senior Housing overlay District (Std). Therefara, under the torn of the &4W -th.;Applicant will enter into a. ;Development Agreceent with the Of iVe project proposed is for 370 units on 505 gross acres of land._ , .711. r 0JECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION��� ibit KA- and "C"}; ippTi, ations � ?-or an wren n e ani� a rrru Iatr an to the 4 Development District Map ha'� n made In aonSenction with a r Proposal for development of j( for cititery project on the subject site and related medica� offfir/4s, sxr An adjacent site :to the east. , A. Action Requested: �/a lfr ant r tquests alp pr€ v,X of apPlycatlOnS to `ir , d t43�U and use Edap of the 6eriaral Pjxn and the Derelopmont ' Dfstrfci; gip. fry taw- iiedil ar ( knsity Residential to High Density axfcierrtial. Affak B. Loc tiotr; Base Line road west of Archibald Avenue C. Parc el Size: 5.5 acre; D. S'irraundin Land tlse.a d ro in = rt!')iflT�lOQ�.,rC South - aacraLow Density Residential F,- * dwelling units per East NeighborhoodCoftercia1 J test - SingTe Family Residential; Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre E. General Plan Desi nitfoa;rt (Exhibit ec.. a ow- up es n a -a dwelling units per acrel •��: mom - IMIghborhood Commercial — South LOW Density 7esidentfal (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) East - Neighborhool Ccwrcial and Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling unftsper acrei West - Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) F. Site Characteristics; The site, consisting of two parcels, -$ ropes gra -ally to "ire toutheast. On one parcel there i�c an older single fAmily residence VMich has no hintorfcal.' or cultural significance and Several smaller storage structures. The other parcel isvacant with a concentration of trees ` adjacent to Base tine Road. PLAWRI!M:6i MMIISSI STAFF REPORT -GF'A 87 -M & DDA 8I -05 - TAC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION � ' September 23, 19$ _ _., - Page 3 \ IV. ANALYSIS: A. Bevel_opment AgMyent Udder the Senior Housing Overlay sir c._;_ \ Purpose: The purpose Senior Housing Overlay ,r ) Us-tri-ef is to provide p �f�jprdable housing 'for senior citizens in an area which s a character unique "to the needs of senior citizens, fine .ding. Cy o, appropriate base district zoning o location in an are which is generally quiet and free from health, s#fet or nais+e problems. o area infrastructure in place including stretts, sidewalks -and traffic Signa►s. ` o site topography Vk1h is fairly Vevel. )r o located near to commercial estahlishmentsr service providers and other amenities. Location: The proposed location. on Base line Road near 'Archibald Avenue 0"ts the above requirements'. Services l includ "4g food shopping, drug stores, banks` and public transportation exist adjacent t!a the site. An emergency care medical facility exists and the applicant is proposing to const�_ "t a medical office building so that additional medical.ba_d dental services may be provided. Recreational facfliti~„:m4y be reached by bu or Van So transportation. 'oo area is well suited to a stiniar project. An earlier SH%:W pr,2ject, the Heritage Parts Senior Apartments, is located on Lomita Court adjacent to the NeighborhooC2 Commercial Ccnter r-to the north. Develo__p�*ent Incentives: In order to achiewb apt` attra ive anncaat y soup senior project, the SHOO offers (evelopunt. incentives; including: o Reduction in reggired on -site parking to a minima ratio of .i non- covered spaces pe:, unit; E R o Density bonus or increased land use density underh the E General plan or -both, and o Fee waivers and��eductions. PLANNING COWISSI SFWF REPORT' ! September 23, 1987 Page The applicant is requesting a char �, "al the Oereral Plan Land: Use Map frog. Low ygdfur Density (4-8 dwelling units Per acre) to High Vensity 124-30 dwelling Chits per acre)~ The applicant is also 'rsque'sting a density bonus to allow an overIA) density of ,34 dwelling units per acre. The applicant ;,fill provide '.one (21 non- covered Parking space per unit, 'fhb applicant Is not requesting waiver of fees. , Staff recooxnds entering into a 3r year a6vt1oppent Agreement with the applicant under the terms; of the $td €or aff0fdabie housIndg for Senior Citiz�ns. For purposes Of the agreaaent target tenants are parsons who are $5 years of, age or older and whose; household incomes cto not exceed SO of aaedian incMe for San Bernardino County as de €inr d by the Federal Department Of Housing and urban r 0+e4014pment. Two and four person housohold sixes are used :;Sjcictively to calculate affordable ants for one and too bedroom apartment sizes. Staff recommends the following terns for the Development Agreement; o Approval of a three silory 270 unit senior profect. 0 Approval of the Generdl Plaid Land use and Development District Amendments ;]us a density bonus to allow a density of Sa dwellinq units per acre. o Approval of one (1) p41*1"9 wpace per unit. Based On Uor presents availAbility of 344 existing units in two projects built yader $We provisions acing the two and four person househi,id rental formula, the= need for this price range senior apartment is close to being met. 8. Existing and ProposedrLand Use: The existing General Flan land us* es gna on sad"i# Density single family residential. ThO LOW-Medium Den$lty designation provides a buffer between tht Neighborhood Commercial and the adjacent single family residential ne hbcrhood. With appropriate siting, landscape treatment and parking, a proposed senior project would cant# "e to provide such a Duffer (Exhibit "D "), C. Density; Through the Cineral Plan Amendment process, the appnZaln—t is requesting an increase in density from LowM,xtediug Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) to high �"sity Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre;,. Additionally, under the Development ,Agreement which will be required by the SHOD, the applicant is requesting a density bonus to allow an i _ 1 PLANNING COWMISSI STAFF REPORT � &PA 8 7-M A ODA &e-06 - TAC DEYM-OPMENT CORPORATION SepteMber 23, 1937 .. : _. Page- 5 ,1 ultiasate density of 34 dwelling units par afire. D '� y serves as an indicator of intensity of mat. A senior project is a tower intensity use than poser WIti: -family rWdential project. For example,, im a ,enior project th *, are typically a predominance of one parson households operating less than one automobile per housahc�a-d. the result ft a reduced demand on infrastructure and services. Therefore the density of a senior Project will not significantly increase the intensity of land use, n V. EMVIROWIENTAL ASSES MT: I c In preparing ttt Envirowntal Asess,aen , s as requested that the applicant supply a traffic study After the traffic information has been received and reviewed, an environmental deterainatlon will be +ma `s. YI. CORRESPONDENCE: This itm has bete advertised a public heari>tig n3 -'i6e'Dail""'"!i rt newhspaper, ��tices ware ve to all property _ owne''r '�r � eat of the project site, ahA Properq� has been posed with a 4t,;s ill Supplemental notification sign. Viz. RECMUDATION: tWAuse iht DeV0.1opment Agreement has not been ,may na ze3 o°c� the project design as d 3jt� nn rt U", have not 1� been cosrpleted, staff --mo msanes t a, th j' tanning Cmaission revitw and comment, on the application for a change in land use and increase-in density for the purposts Of providing.a 1 70 unit senior housing 'project, under t4e,,S�QD until October 28, 198 7. and c0tisrue the public hearing Respectfu`�, 1.!�ubmittn Br .le - City astitr BB:MB:vc Attachments: Exhibit 09 a Vicinity /Land Use Exhibit 138" General Alan Lanj Use Fled Exhibit NCw = Development Districts map Exhibit O Site Plan n L 11 E 1w DATE: TO: FROM: 9y: SUBJECT: CITY 02RANCHO CtJCAMONG,&- STAFF REPORT September 23, 1987 1.11airman and Nowers, of-the Planning cowission Brad Buller, City Planner Miki erat, msistant Planner ENVIROMWAL ASSESMENT -.;'M GEMp& ,pLAk AWNWENT 87.04H - YX OLVELOPPIEWT requV31-G w ";Mweno z" Lana use 14ap Of Me neral- ,, Low4ledius Residential (4.8 &elling units per acre} to Office for 1.69 d",es-cf land located On the West side of Archibald AVahui. $09th of"Blate Line Road - AN: 208-031-17, 54, 56, 56. and 67. PRY-IROMWNTAL -AR$SWNT I AN DEVMoPWNT DISTRICT VEMeve - A . equest - to- W`107M-Lf lo7nt DistrTict-Mp fFWT&",'IedI= Residential 4-8 dwel 1, 9 units per acrel to Office professional for 1.69 acres f land, located on tht , � -west Side of Archibald Avenue, south Of Anse line Road - APN*. 208-031-17, 54, 55, 56 and 57. I. Ammm Ite applicant is requesting a General Plan Amendment and zone cha—nge'on 1.69 gross acres of land in order to build an 8,150 square foot wdical Offftie building as part of a development Package submitted under ;he Senior Housing Overlay District (SHOrkl_ of Oe Development Code. The package al,;o inCludet the proposed 170 :snit, three Story senior apartment compliex, as well as a General Plan Amendment and lone change on the 6.5 gross acres of land needed for the housing Project and 41 Development Agreement. At this meeting the Planning Commission is requested to'review and comment On the office component of the package and to-continue the public hearing to October 28, 1987 for PlAnNing Commission recommendaticns to the City r�puncil. 11- BACMOUNW Th,"is General Nan Arendment jtnd Oevelopient District Affiendeme n wree initiated by TAC Development CQrP9MtioIn. The property is bounded on the north and east by com"rcial development and On the south by a church. ThC senior cftf�pn t��usin? project to be developed under the Senior Housing OvOrT41z'Diltrict (SHOD) is pnoposed on the west. BecAtise the availabillityi of medical services is a SHOD 9cal, the applicant is proposing to build a medical office project at this location adjacent to the senior projouct, PLANNIM COWISSI STAFF�,REPORT GPA 87 -04H & DDA b/-O$ - 'TAC DEVELOPMENT September 23, 1267 Page III. PROJECT ANP- 17-ZTE DESCRIPTION: Applications for an amendment to thir Lan se rr o e narz Plan ;rid to the: Development District (t4ap have been eta a in conjunction with a proposal for development of a medical office project on the subject site and a senior �v citizen project on an adjacent site to the crest. A. Action Request eds Tire applicapt requests apg-Aval of app ca oi'"ns ��q aim the Land Use Map of the General Plan !Vl d the Development Districts rasp from Low- Y.kvlum Density Residential to Office;Professional. 8, Location* Archibald Averue south of Base Lint R4A r C. Parcel Size: 1.69 acres _ D. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning (Exhibit "r and MC ")e or o[eieerc !Ill Neigh5orn000 commerc"a South Church; Low Density ReS1Jential,-(2. -4=d lling units per acre) East - Commercial and Single Family ResidL�tial;, Neighborhood Commercial and tow Deni ty Residential p (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Vacant and Christmas Tree Farm; Low-Wdium Residential (4 -8 dwelling unitrJ�per ae 1 E. 3eneral Plan Designations (Exhibit "511• f ProjectSize - ow- edl'ura es enf a '-8 dwelling units per* acre) North - Neighborhood Cc4asercitl South Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwealin'g units per acre)'- East Neighborhood Commercial and Low Density Residential (2 -4 dgellfng units per acre) West - Low- Hediurs pasideatial (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) F. Site Characteristics: '1~r;e topography of the site slopes gently to Vie sou eas , aving about a 3% grade. Three single family residences with detached garages now occupy part of the Site. These existing dwellings would become non - conforming uses with adoption of the. amend -nts- These units would be scheduled for d�oiition with development of the medical office site. one resid;nce has a built -in swi i,,g pool. Ane southerly pdrtior.- Of tK Sits is used for a Christirss tree fans. IV. ANALYSIS: A. Cam arison of Existing and Proposed Land Use: The applicant >; requests a uener-a-1 Flaff Apen nz and zone c angt from Lower - WAlum Residential designation to Office Professional designation on 1.69 acres of laird. The !'!applicant has also submitted plans for project approral of 8,164 square foot medical office building_(Exhibik "D "). 1 Ft,'," "`P 1:it1TSS' Silt REPORT G0A--i;ci44AH & DDK W -06 - TAC DEVELOP14ENT SeptembCr 23, 198% Page The present Loft- %!ed#um Aesfd&.ntia', land 'designation se�+v03 as a buffer;-hptwean tht , ngi family resideatiaa neighborhood to the sou6 fora the vsI*mrcial acre$ adjacent . to the intersoctIlon cif Archibald J4 enue and aaae Line Road to the nbtth. , "The propos �l , Office Professional use could also 1ft�hnion, as a ^`s,imf (ar- buffer provided the co cite uld designed sensitive to the #ssuas of setb,&Cks, parking/ cfrculationv lends ping, and building design to ensnare that the aRSdfcal affix use would be ccpatible with adjacent residential uses.. :church directly south of the property #s within the Low 00 ity Residential zone and also functions as part of tjh Medium intensity land use buffer zone B. C .rc0atioft As part of the nna`iron stPl ,t rariew, the app°°iic'an Kos A, asked iD l nit addi #'octal infor4ation about traffic which"' will b generated' * _ og p�-jeet. Thfit information has not y ,been received. V. ENVIROiaElilr'. AS SS % to pt'iaparing; en Environmental sessmen , s as I- requasted that, the Xti Velcper prepare a traffic study. After the traffic inforaeat an Is 'received. and reviewed, an environmental determination will be ado. VI. CORRESP6N�lZE: This itaar< has bplen adxert #see as public itiearis�g al tZ Report newspaptr, notices were sent to jail property owners . ac a S "' eel Of the 'project site and that - roperty has been posted with a 41 x 81 suppl"ntal notification sign. � L VI1l. - KEGOWENR ATIONi: Staff recamendSLthIt thiLj Planaai tg Ca issio#t rey ell ; an caRwent on the office C016'00neift of the applicant's proposal to -buiN a senior citixan project under the Senior Housing Overlay District of the Development Code and cortjnue the public {' hearing to Cctober 28, 1907. Y Res,' l ly _su tted, ra 1 r City pl r►er 8B:M8. vc Attachments. Exhibit "A" - ifouity Mao k Exhibit "6" Existing > -LaF Use Exhibit "C" a ExistingeA>raT Planiionfn? r Exhibit "D" Site Man U C 'rte R RESOLUTION NO, A RESOLUTIO4 OF THE RAKNO CUCAMOWW k ANSIN i SSF " ; ti RECta ICING APPROVAL Q , A REQUEST TO MEND THE LAND VU, MAP OF THE GENERAL i An ", ;PA E3 -046, FROM COt+ "MEOYUM RESIfi� 1I IAL (4 -8 DWELUNG E4KITS PEE{ 4e ) TO N "CN RESIOEN I�!C. {24 -30 DWELLI!!E UNITS PER Aye FOR A SER' 'ROUSING PROJECT ON' 6.05 - ACRES OF Lt.Na" WCATEEE -.�R" Tj E :�1'P3TH 319E OF BASE UNE ROAR, VW 'OP ARCHTISALV'A C�Z38� R. NO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORKA, AW MAKE FINDfRG T� SUPPORT iF REt A. Recitals. ` � Ci'I Nourse Development his files) an ap6icl. on for caner;T Plan Amendment 87 -04�' as doscribed in `the title of thi3��escSution. Hereinafter in ' this Resolution, the subje#''� General Plan A sndm0nt is irefprred to as "The ` Application." ° 7 r f 'I (it) On March 23, 1988, tl,* Planning C rss� •oaf the City 'of Rancho Cuca "a conducted a duly sivii cect public heamittg`t rlbe Application and concludIdd said hearing on that, dote, �iiil 1411 legal prerequisites to the aitrption o thlis, Resolution have occurred.' D. Resolution; NOW, THEREFORE, #t i �l reby ru40, determined, and resolved by the Planning COmmfpsion of the Ci -o' Rancid± Cucarjonga a& follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts ser forth in the RacitelsR� \Part A, of t.% Resolytion are trite'and correct. 2. Based upon, substantial evidence presented to tit) bsxrw�issior� during the move- referenced public hearing on March 23, 1984,` Including written and oral- staff" reports, together with public testimony , this' Commission hereby cpecifically,,finds as follows: ,. Qal The Application appli>y to a 5.0 arre -- parcel of 'lend basically rectkngular in configuration,j=ated on the south side o€ Base Line Road, west of Archibald Avenue., Said property is currently designated as .ow- Rediu kesi4ential'(4 -C dwelling units per, acre) on the Land Use Map of ��� General Plan and is currently developed with an older si%Ul faMity`.resid,'Oce with ,tree ren�,ainder of the site vacant land with a concentration of t%r e!S adjacent to .base Line Road; and a 1 , PLAil91% Ci' iSSICli RnoLU6''l% No. OMER& PLAN MENDMENT 87440 March 23, 19,80 Paga :. tbj The property to the nor* of the spbject site is designated neighborhood Cow roial On the L04 4lse M,ap of Seneral Van and consists of a neighborhood tomercial 'snapping can r tote sropariy to Me f soettt of the subjact sit 'fS Designated Low Resfdentfal units c per acres) on the land Use 1, df,th1 6(nsral Plan ano towsts of Vacant lend and low density sfngt4 hilly resader�tfa7�, the 'Property to the ea�t<:is designated Wighborhoodl` rcfal on the Land Me Hip of tit+e o oval flan and C) consists of to ne�iaghbTdikud com' rdial�jshoppi�amtoro and t,� "66perty to the west is designated 4.i h 1iG* F R'# �: Rtj , r arit s:LI?u` Use Map of the do n 041", fart `. r utsfsts, oi�Jo ' do sfty single fa o� ' residential: and ' tc? the Npptfsati �^a its tt� Awdoopt of the Land ire tia of the dfinera7 Plan frto si:w -With R��sfjeptiae t4*� dveJJ# units perk e�reT c_ to Nigh Resirle tE` *'> 4' dw0ling edits per acre} for the ...05 acre p3eree1 •, aid 4 tdy llre pplxcatioo�.Wuld be consistent smith the' ind iJse ET aeitt of the federal Plan, towljV not result In potentially significant adverse ip Wts ta. persons and property in th+s- is .3iate vicinity of !the subject sine, ar►d arould be in the best Interests of the health, seety, and ralfarso- of the c,itfxens of,the Citr 0 Rarcho Cuca��. i sedupane ctantialaidere pren?wd,o this Coaissfr S. Sa y I during the_3bove- roferen<ed public hearing-And upart tho specific fitso�ngs of Fact set t^t4t in paragraphs 3 lhnd above, iirix Cow WI-Pn hereo €its and 'Mcludes that the POfcartion should be crosistent with thi 'Wadives tine Land Use and •Musing- El Oments of the° Gneral Plat, miuld cte, in 04 best interests of the City of, Rantho Cucaasorsaa and 'woulu vrutec't _Us heals , sa/ety', and Werfare of the p, tiZens of Ran&O Cucateoitga, California. Xn ctsniu'nctfon Ifith�.,Thet 4, ApplicatianY an Initial StudlYf' AlAeliminary Ehvirciss snt, I Assessftit, in confor�aity �t' it fire res eiraa its with dine California Envirvi>AOental Quality Act, has been,,)', par d. The Co�aisgfon hias determined that this project would not have SSsignificant adverse'effect fin the envirgn nt, InChereby recc nds the finding rsf na signff ;cant farpact find the Issuance Of 8(;3W4tiv:n Deialaration by the Ci,Y Council. S. Based upan the € ndf%s and coriclr:sions set forth in aragral)hs i, 2, and 3 above, this Coasssission hereby reconds approv, of The Applicat%4 and directs that a .certified copy of thin Resolution and related Material be forwarded to the City Council for €`final'deteratination. u. The Deputy secretary to this Coasasissi"on shall CerLffy to the adoption of tRis Rc:-Olution. - RESOLUTIO e-11q, A REW -AIDN #F THE RANCHO ZUCAMONOA PLANNING CON'TSSiow R ,MENDING APPROYX OF A REQUEST TO AK%V THE ME LOPMENT DISH CT MO, RDA 87 -45, FROF! L NEDILIM htSadENiIAL (4-8 OWELLTNO UNITS PER ACREi � KIM RESIDENTIAL (2 440 DWELL � UNITS PER ACAS) ATTAd� E Nllttt M�`!!O #�,tY DISTRICT 4SHOG) Fes, 0 1' ACRE PARCEL L TED 01 SOttTN S,Iidh OF ,4� ��• WEST OF ARCHHAW AYEiR}� . RANG CUCM04 A IF AND MAKE FINDINGS IN SUpj'VRT A. Recitals„ 4 ;a fit Notrse+el. ant hls filed an applicatiorq for 6era1 g;an Amendment 87� -040 as describa� 1 the *Tile of this Resolution. Nkretpafter+ in this Resolution, the -subject, 6anera1',1,P7an Ame ndmci l, is referred tar,as "The „ Application." :!� �. n k On Much 23, 988, „ � ths� Planning„ Commission of �� Ci, of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a du;7,;y notiged p�a61 fii hearing an The. Pl iCAt` #on i and concluded said hearing "on that.datea (iii) All legal prerequist ti, _.ie adoption of this Resdiution have occurred. Bp Restitution. NOW) 111"EFORE, it is hereby Found, determined, and resolved by the I Planning Coammissi -On of he City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows; !. This Commission_ _:hereby specifically finds that all of the factt . set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Reaolation are true and correct. 2. Based upon - substantial evidence ��r sented to ,.thin Commission during the above- refereni.-ed public hearinl on March 23, 1988, includin written ;and oral staff reports, togetheri with public testimony ,, to Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The Application �, pVles to a 5.05 cre parcel of land 1 basically rectangular in conf'igurafiiorx located on the south side of Base. Line' Road, west of Archibald °Avenue, W property is currently designated as Low- Medium Residential {4-8 dwelling d its pert ire} orr the Development District t!fap and is currently developed with an old6r single family residence with the rr:maer of the site vacant land with a concentration of trees adjacent to Base Line Road; acid AlftL 1p �r PLANNING COMMISSIQN' *ES6L6TION NO. < � DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AM NT 87- March 2% 1988 ,1 page:_�r�_ �Y. (b) Tlie property to the nortih of the subject sitst is designated Neighborhood rcial on the Developptent District Map 'and consists of a neighborh oawaercial shopping center, the property ft the south of -,the subject $ite s desi na Lour Residenti t (C 4 dwelling units ' per act*) on the Ehtvelop 8istr 0 leap and consists vacant land and low densft; single faaaily re dential, the property to � east is designated Neighborhood Coaerercial the OevotoPMOnt 4istrict leap and consists of a neighborhood commercial sho ing center, and the property to the west is designated Low Residential ;`4 dwelling units per acre) on the !Development k` District Map and consists. of *vow density single faarl residential; and i (c) The Application re quests the \ ` AaRrrdarent of the Development District Map from Low-Medium Re;iclential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) 'to High Residential 124-3Q dwelling .units per.,act -) attached with the Senior Housing Overlay District (SHOD) for the 5.46 a6fie- parcel; and td, The Application would be consistent with the Latd Use Element of thec_.nnneral Plan, would not result in potentially significant adverse impacts tit persons and;, property" in the iaxediate vicinity . of the subject:_. ;ite, would be in the' best interests of the health, safely, and welfare, of the citizens of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and is consistent with the necessary preconditions requi,rtd by Section 17.20.040D of the Il Development Code as prerequisites that remit be present for the site to be considered for a senioa- housing project., 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the abovewreferer`rced public hearing and upon the specific findings of fact set forth in aragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and, concludes that the application would be cp"istent with the objectives of oe Land Use and Housing Elenv nts of the General Plan, would, be in the best Interests of the City of Rand Cucamonga, and would protect the health, r safety, and welfare of the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga, California.' 4. In codvnctio wfth Th( Application, an Initit Study/ Preliminary Ehvironaental asses -A ht, in conformity with the requirement! with the Caiffoniiat Environmerttal Q slily Act, has been' prepared. The roaasissicn ��as deter' fled that this, prod' t would Wet} ,have ,a significant adverse !effect on the environment, and hereby recomraendsl-iAe finding of no significant impact and the issuance of a *gative Declarr..tion by the City Council. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Comission hereby recommends approval of The Application and directs that 3 certified copy of this Resolution and related material be forwarded'to the City Council for final determination. 6. The tepo�y Secretary to this Co�t*issirn shall certify to the adoption cf this Resblutior,. PmHING`COIMMISsiob* RESOLUTION 1� , DEVELOPMENT, DISTRICT AMENDWRl �IF�D5 March 23, 1gs8 < ;v Page,3 _ �v APPROVED AND AiEEtt THIS 23RD IiRY;iit: MARCH. 198€3. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO cUCjM NGA 5 BY:' tarry,.. McNial, a rtaatt ATTEST. c Brad 8611 er, JlRaPUtY o rY \, Is Brad Buller, *tlty Secretary Of the Planning comission of the MY of Raincho Cucaiaatlga, do hereby certify that the foragoirrg- Resolutt`dn was duly artd, regularly► introduced, passed, and adopted by the Ran"ing co�tission of the City► of Rancho Cucanonga, at a regular +�tting of tw, Planning Comission held on the 23rd day of March, 19�88,�,byr the fo ng V00-to-44 1.1.* RYES: COMMISSIONERS:, NOES; COMMISSIOIiEltS: _ ABSENT; ci�1MISS�fSaER$. � `i `� WE J rrt�_ RESOLUTION MO. UNIA Nq-Ci RMISSYON OF THE ENTITLED "`Mvet. WENT MrarMre[ ay. CYTiZEi,S' 10$11W COKERNINS'TMT PROPERTY LOCATE SOUTH OF BASE LINE ROAD, WEST OF ARCHIDALD AVENUE, 10 THE CITY OF RARCHO CUM00, CALIFORNIA A. Recitals. (i) California Government Code Section SSW Wow provides, in pertinent part, as follows., "The legislature finds and declares that.. Na) The tack of certainty f, the approval of development projects can result'in a Este of resources, escalate the cost of housing and other aevelopaent� to the, consto— , and discourage investment in 494, COMitment to capi4hensive planning which Mould matte axim ma efficient utilization of resources at the leash econ*c cast to the public.." 1. {b) Assurance to the aWlcant for a development,, pR;oject that upon approval of the project, the may pr;ceed with the project in accordance with existing panties, rules and re,s.ulations, and subject to conditions of ; approval, Hill strengthen the public planning process, encourage private particvpationin c srehensive planning, and reduce the econaoic costs of Uielopoent." (ii) California Govortmtnt Code Section 65865 provides, in pertinent pact, as follows: "My city . , may enter into a development agreement with aty person havin a legal or equitable interest in p "eal property for the development of such property as provided in this article...." (.iii) California Coverr _ ;: Cade Section 8586",2 provides as follows "A development agreement shall: specifl the duration of the agreement, the permitted uses of "the property, the density or intensity of use, the maximum height and size of proposed buildings* and provision for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes. The development agreement may include conditions, terms, restrictiont and requirements for subsequent discretionary actions, provided that such conditions, terms, restrictions arid„ requirements for subsequent discretidnary actions ;shall not.:.,prevent r ri PLANNING cOMMISSIOR RESOLUTION 90. DEVELOPi W AGREEMENT 67 -02 - HEST EiEy March 23, 1988 develop ofd land f�-the uses and to the density *or intensity p eht ', forth in the agreamentj (ivy Gatliforaia 6►overmmnt Dude Section 65915 provides th&Z a ciV may, by a�greew with a developer �ant a density bonays over that allowed by ue waximuO� density Ostablished in tha` Development Coder and Lana Usp Eleeant Of the General Plan when a developer agrees to construct h�asing ' €er income senior househp1-d3. (v) Attached to Ws Resolution, mark -ed as 6* bit vF 'Fend incorporated herain by this reference, is a proposed Development Agreement concerning that property IWa ,t vherally south of Ease Lime Road andd west of Archibald Avernie, in the City i . _,,!luneho .uc a,, and as legally described in he attached OevA3lcpment Agriii4k`:.' -Hereina ter ,I this Resolution, that agreement attached ereta as ErhiLit "VI is referred to as Othe Uvelopment Agrement, (Vi) Concurrent with ,this Resolution recomwendiag . approval of this Developme nt Agreement, the Planning Commission has adopted k.'solutions recommending approval for%both; the 4eneral Plan classification for the sub act property from Low- Medium Residrnt-fal to High Residential and the Devei . District classification for such oroperty f a Loaaliuea Itesidlntial District to a.High ResidentiAl District with a �'a r, Owsing Overlvt (vii) inn March!,23, 1989, the Planning Co iss on of the ,City of Rancho Cucamonga hold a duly noticed public hearing concerning the proposed Development Ajreement and concluded said hearing oeti thAt date. (viii) All legal arerequisitex prior to the adoption of, this Resolution have occurred. S. Resolution ` NOW, TNEREFORt, it herein it ordaine!t by tire, Plan+f g C ission o €�, -� the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: , Resolution, I. In all' respects as tet�' 'nth in thy;. o eis, Fart A, of this i R, in conjunction with this Dovelopent Agreaont, an initial Study /Preliminary Environmental Asses��eent, in ca�nfotsttty < with the requirement erith the California Environmental Quality Act, has been prepared, Commission has detwrained_ ti at this project Woattd Itot have a significant adverse effect on the enA�irzorment, and hereby recommends the .,finding of no significant I' act and the issuance of a Negative Declaration by k the Oity Council. i 4 f PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLW ICU NO. S3EYELOPMENT AGREEMENT 87 -02 - NEST END March, 23, 1588 Page 3 AWL 3. This Commission specifically Binds Uat; t (a) The location, design and Proposed uses set forth in the Development Agre 6d t are compatible with the character of existing development in the vicinity, (b) The Development Agreetent will produce internally an environment of stable and desirable character, and not tend to cause any traffic congestion on surrounding or access streets; � (c) The�,�proPosed A al t will be we17 integrated into its setting; and (d)" itie Development Agreement conforms 'to the General. Plan of the City of Rancho Ca,�aawnga. 4.. It is, *xgresslj= found that the public neessity, general wa:lfarl and good zoning practice require the appepyal of the Development Agreement.,-,` , 1� *a. It is further found that the Increase in unit density io 35.E dwelling units per acre is in the best1nterests of the Public health, tdf --% and welfare since the project as conteWlated will �be occupied by seni,r households of lore. income, in conformance with the pro�,Jaions of California Government Cadk- ,Section 6015. 5. This Commission hereby recommends approval of the Development Agr°eemnt attached hereto as Exhibit OV, And directs that a certified copy of this Resolution and related uterial be forwarded to the City Counc4l for final determination. 7. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolutions c I APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF MARCH, 1988, r` ` PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMdOWIA BY: i arry�i�`Aiel ZTer,^taan �l f ATTEST: E_"8'0a" 6-B 1 er, epucy becrefiry d i PLMNING COMISSION RESOLUTI09 ' UEVELOMEN AGREEMW ST -OZ - WEST Et�i I[p March 23, 1 Pap i, 8t�a�,80170e, kput�t_ Secretary af° �a�Plannfng Cbmission of time 4ity of RancCuc+Gonya, da hereby certfify th t ?�!e forofing Resalutipn gas iuly and re47'i V f0trod"ad, passed, grad a ited by the! planning CosArtssio;, of the �C9ty of Rancho Cucamon", at a reguiar !yeti�g of Punning Coaemissiott held on the 23rd day of Larch, IM by the 1`011 o�ng, vote- to-it: ff AYES: Ct3MIMiSSICRS: NOES: UNNIS SIGNERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Y o a DEi LOPHENT AGREEMENT NO. , 87 -02 XXN10R CITIZENS, NOUSING THIS AGREVIENT is entered into as of the "Effective Date" sat forth herein by and between TIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Calij�tnia carparatiom ( „Developer ") and the,, CITY t� or micio CQCAMONGA11a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of California ( "City"), yXAAIZT11: A. Recitals. (i) California Government Code Sections 65864 at seq. authorizes cities to enter into binding development agreements with persons having legal or ecgaitable interests -in real property for the develpment of s ch property. (ii) Ca��� Government code Section 65915 pr�jides that a cite,oay, by agreement with a developer, grant a density bonus over that allowed by tne';•maximum density established in the ' development c6de and land use element of the general plan when a t_ developer agrees to ;onstruct housing for low income senior households. Developer owns all inter2ist in and to that. real property located entirely within City,ae common and legal description 'of which is stet forth in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and - hereinafter is referred to as "the Site." (iv) The Site is now ;zoned High Residential, with a 7 Senior Housing overlaly District pursuant to the provisions of Cityss Development Code, as amended to date hereof. Developer ` and City desire to provide through this Development Agreement more specific development controls on the Site which will provide for maximum efficient utilization of the Site in accordance with sound planning prAnciples. (V) The Developer proposes to construct a senior � housing residential Vroject, including slow income snits, within the City. Said project contemplated by Developer will regoire an increase in the maximum density ��s currently provided in the ' senior Housing Overlay District. yv) it is the c%siire of City to encourage developments designed to provide a for6ible rental units for senior residents of the city.. In furtherance of that desire, the City is hereby willing to grant a density bonus to Developer as pravided'by the terms OC,his Agreement. (vii) on , 1987, City adopted its Ordinanc x;, thereby approving this Development Agri "Msnt with Developer and said Action was effective on r 1 -. NOW, TxERLFOREo the parties hereto agro* as follows; i. D''-°taitimic- in this Agreement, unless thsj context otherwise :egi+ixe, the fo meaning; llowing terms shall have the following A. "C .tya is the City of Raacho Cucamo*sgA, l b. "Project" is the developsen? approved by City comprised of one hundred seventy (17Q) apartment units,, recreational and common area facilitie3, une hundred seventy (170)'parkinq'spaces a�xd other' *Aitias on the site, all 4L* not forth more fui , i in th site plan for Development Review 87 -33 wubmittsd by Developer and approved by City, a cope of Vibich is <*vtache 4 h+nrcato, marked as Exhibit "B" and is incor, ratitd by this reference. Tho site pla4 attached a-- includes various ccnditaanrs u approval Which ppy�re not changed, altered or mti6iffied by this Develop= pt Agreement unions speeifia1lll* etet forth herein, The project also includes the rsco�ds -of "he appl oifs by Developer, +' z OCacitdiil:`a before tin's sian-41i commission and City council of City on file With ht e City and all such rascords and files in these matters are incorporated har*in by this reference Cc though set forth in full. C. "Qualified Project Period" means the first day on Which the residential units in the development are first available for occupancy by Qualified Tenants and continuing for thirty (30). years. d. "quulifi4d Tonant „!o shall- mean persons or hoe sehC'tds who are at least :ifty -five (55) years or,o4der and era senior citizens as defineet, in Section 51.3 of the f ; California Civil Code as iia d &actions are written az Of the affective date of t1ii* ,A,greement. Qualified Tenants shall also posse s an income equal to or less tkan eighty percent (80) Of the current County °of San Bernardino modian., income as;,determined by the Federal Department of Housing W> d urban Dav loprs�nt pursuant to section 8 cif the united States �oua Ins Act Of `41,937- in the avant such =ederal determirattjo+ a of - -',c area medians income are discontinued, other means to determine the 'median incou*, as determined by the City, shall be established for Rancho Cucamonga, or Rancho Cucamongats geographic area, Pt eighty percent (80*) of the area median income, adj.i-ited for family size and revised annually. e, "Atfordpble Rents„ shall mean those rents chapr ad to qu2lifi4e. tehnants, which Y` nt shall be on anI ,hualized basis equal to or =less this thirty percent (31J� --'Of the eighty percent (8a %) of the current median income as established for Qualifie3 Tenants. For purposes of this definition, rents charged for all one (1) bedroom units shall ,be rubject tc nomp. �ation based on eighty percent (80�) of- ,ths'median.3n6� -,*e for a two'-0) person household. Reintu charged fd,,.[1U,. two (2) bedreom writs shall be subject to ctmputatison based upon eighty pe^:c;eat (80 %) of the,.-iiedian income'lf= all �auseholds for four (4) or more persons. f. "Effective DateO sh*.11 sawn tbtt 31st-j Iendar day following adoption of 'the ordinance aj, ,p .-ving this Agreement bV Citlyf$ City Counef,l. 2. Rentals. The recitals: are part of the agreement between the parties and shall be enforced.,;and enforceable as any other _ provision of this Agreement.' 3. inter_ �� Prooert$ 9 ner. Developer warrants anal represents that it has full ,:legal title to thie real-: property:, that it has full legal right to enter into this Agreement and that the persons executing this &IFeement on behalf of Developer have been duly aut)*;3)ri2ed to ,do 4•g Agreement. The Developer hereby subjects the development and the land described in Exhibit IIA0 heret5 to the covenants, reservations and restrictions as s t forth in this Agreement. The City and the Developer hereby' glare their specific intent that the covenants, reservations and restrictions as set forth heroin shall be deemed covenants running with the':: land and shall pass to and becbinding upon the Developer's successors and assigns in title or interest to the `Development. Mach u%d every contract, deed or other instr& =t horeinafter executed, covering or conveying the developmenf-or any portion thereof shall conclusively be held to have been executed,, deliverer:° and accepted subject to the covenants, reservations and restrictions expressed in this Agreement, regardless of whr`ther AlQk such covenants, X'eservat?ons and restrictions are set for in Snch contract, deed oe other instrument. , City and Dey'alopet hereby declare their understanding and intent that the burden of the novena Ps, reservations and restrics.�,ons se?t forth herein touch end O oncern the land in that t thee: Devaloporfs legal interest in the,da�elopmant is rendered r les€1 valuablQ,tb.erebir. The cif and '*401,opor ,horeby further declare tt eeir undoilstanding and intsat that the bert+s qit of such r ct:,renantp, tcuoh) mna concern the la 44 b +. xicing and increasing the on nymen,,. -and - use of the Dovelopment by �ia�� f� ed Tenants, the intended;seneficiari*s of such covenants, rt4 rviti.ons and restrictions; td by furthering the public purporos. for which his Agreement is adopted. Further, the parties hoxeta agree that such covenants, reservations and restrictions be'nofit ,,"all ether real, prcporiy lobatad in the City of Ranches cuc,amongaa. 7j -`• a S2 � It' is understao3 that the t contra*tual relationship b.stwgens, City and Developer is sucl� that Developer is an independent ��arty and is not the agent of.eitr for any pa rp:Dse whaats< fever inri shall not be considered to be the agent of City der any ahecsoecrer. 6. To= ,gg Agreement. The term of the � aement shall commence on the effaectimie da4�a and shalL.l oxpire this" y (30,) Years after the commencement of the Qualified Pro jeht Pe::iod; sq... long as Developer remains in mattrial cosepl }"" nCZ ►ith this i4;vredment, as frem time to time ascended. Ttlxis.,AQflaement shall be, deemed t6 be terminated automatically if Developer does not obtas , Certificate .of Occup inCy for the atntijrety of the . ro e`t within throe (3) years of the effective data, Ct° 7, Aestr ctiosas gD 1entai, units. All tenants, occup&nts, �_-Ad residents of apartsayMt, -units in the Prcje�, shall be Qualified Tenants. said apartment units shall not be rented, occcpied, � leased or subleased., to occupants who are not „qualified Tenants except as provided -as follows: a. A person �or person who is not a Qualific`sd Ten'4t, and is at least fortyrfiv+e (45) years of Ia, �AR, stay !occupy „tom, 1 an apartment unit if ,he or she cccuplA,.j,;an apartrent Vic, unit witbt ai ,present occupant who is a Qualits.ed TenatntO and who VtZpVi_ *z primary physical,,nr economic support. " to such Qxialiiied Tenant; b. A person at least forty -five (45) years -of age who is the spouse of a Qualified Tenant may occupy a unit with such Qualified 'yenant;' j and ;y c. A person or persons under fifty -fiv,z) (55) years of age r mal occupy apartment units as' t+empo-7a tenants for period of time not to exceed ;three '3T`mcnths dur6 �. any cal,, year. r z? 7 Luring the Oumlifie d `1 project Perri o <' units in tr-h" Pa o j act!i ahall be re74ted or leased to low inC *�hWQug,K�lieed Tenants, as dafined herein. { additianal3 x,f �' aeast esixry (60) days prior to any iaicrease in l� j rental rates; as computed by the teerms of this Agreement, the { Developer shall provide writ ten notice sf a+ucli increaser to the dity and all affected tenants. a 9. yinteezaance g�1r�'enta 3Li£ During the term hereof, all apartment;,3,wjts in thde pact :Shasii, remain rental units. So apartment auzit in the project *hall be eligi,bi'4 for l conversion, from rental units to co sdoivini �s, toWnhousets or any j other common ,intorcest sub4 vision without bonssent of t4a city 1 council. _ site nagm! A full. -�tim� manager shall bee- provided on, they Project site. 6 11. TIM _o pia 'mow, Rtsidents shall ha ire 'he right t 'i establish es. committa+e compa54d of tenant v for the purposk« of organixirig social activities and provitjirig e;e�n3tGebnta and suggestions to the DoVeloper, regarding; thee _Oparat bit And 'facilities of the project. '70thing i� thja section shall ha I to restrict the- ri4k-�s of i.ndt0iduals to Organize activities, and provide comments to the Devetilopar; i 12. 1ukm3:Ui= Data iaiee= AAB Iii. Prior to occupancy, Developer shall submit to City "nant seelection proceilures Which shall detail the methods which Developer shall i use to advertise the avai,�aQbility of apartments in the Project and screening" MGchanismsi which Developer intender' to use to limit the occupancy of thti apartments 'to tAlalifiod: �'enesnt�s. 1 _ On or beforea,:,., 1i of each year followin g the e t;ommenctmant of thi;. qu&l3.jtied Project Period, the Developer, or its representative, she ' 1 f11Q a certificate of continuinel program compliance with the city. Each such re pnrt shall contain such informa� ion as City may require Lnclt"ing, taut. not iim tad to, the following: a. Rent schedules then in affe3cte including utility charges. (if any) ; b• A project occupancy profile, including age; resident profile and number of automot43,es owtiaei by Project reside,ttas; d.. A daacript= -on of all written complaints'received from ' 5 1 o n J r d. A'certiiication that low income requirements have been met; a. A list of substantial ph:i,ical defects in they Project including a description of repair or maintenance Work undertaken cur #q the reporting year; and f. A description of the physical condition and m'aintemance procedures for the Project, incIfling apartment units, Ian {zcaping, walkwayn and recreational araa�,, -- City shall he allowed to conduct physical •?ngpections of the Project it deem ;to j- ., . .as shall n aesesary, provided said inspecticros do not usireaaeso bly interfere with the normal opera;tiorns of "the. .Project and! reasonable nr1tic« is provided. The i city or furfihar ba allowad to conduct an annual survey o f residents' in the Pxaject .la orc?ar t ; assess, senior needs. 13. Ten= .. Contro 2ta -Aid Raiat 3ilati.2 nsa On receipt of an application for occupancy, Developer shall,' determine the eligibility of tho. occupam ,, ruder the terms of this Devei�imont Agreement. Varificatic a *2 tenant eligibility :shall inclueda one or more of tht following actrsrsi a., Obtain an incoma verification form From the S�Oi,a.l. Security Administration and/ ?,theQ Cal fornJA7" ` tsepartment of Social Services=i if the applicant„ recei:y! es income from either or' both, agencies, b. Obtain an income tax r aturn for tLe most recent tax year: C. Conduct .a TRW or similar financial search; d. obtain an income verification from all currant employers; and, eg. If the applicant is unemployed and has no tax return, obtacin anot,�ar form of independent'. verification. Developer shall be entitled to rely an the information contained in the application sworn tz by the applicant. All agreements for rental of all apartment'.units in the Pro$ -ct shall be in writing. The form of proposed snt or lease a regiment' shalt, be reviewed and approved b�j e.1tiy,;�ior to the co��enceMent of. the �- Qualified Project Pearit�d. Sf,ch agreement shall include, all rules and regulations goyearix'.ng �e nancy within the Project. The rule�a jil and gulations"lihall include regulations which speci 1, fically' — , au*jiiZ& the keeping of small pets WithiA all ap� _Ttment units. 14.// ZY49ZIgn TAnArU. A tenancr may be te-1-minated without thQ tArmination being doomed 4P�'*Viction under the following alrotlastancox: a. The ftath of the xq,14 tenant Oz the Unit; By the ;�*nint at the 4XPirotion Of thq term of occur%Ancycr othOrWixe upon thirty (3�) dayz3,1 written notice; C By abandcraent: of -,the promises by the tenant; or By fail urk) of d a a*t to execute or raintw a lease- Any tarm$,n#t-4P.n Of A-' tQ-3ta-XICY Other t-a-In those I.Ut4d above in this paragraph 14 Shall,constitute an�eviotion,. �D*volOqer shall only evict in complialice, With,the provi law and t� n onl SiOM-1 09 Celifornia for material noncompliance With,"fAq ,,�4rmj of, ths�rentajea 'Y greement.� Residency proforon�' shall be �'jiven where possibletq applicants t" the PXOjitct who have been r�woidentz of 0 the CitY of Rancho Cucamonga. However, that fadtd-r of1tall not be given priority over the other *laments Of QUaliZiod Tenant selectitn a's statod,hor&in. 16. HALO= PrOje�,t�-and all improvementaltnhaere�or,�insUred at al I timiiz against loss or damage by fire or ether risk Covered by a standard 69tonded civerage, ' endorsement and such other(r-is%s, P*rils.cr coverage aiDeveloper determine. During the term hereof, th* Project shall bQ insured to 4ts ful�.,insuranc& replacement valu3. 17. K41=2=22 GMAXAMM. Developer shall comp�ywfth all city maintenance standards,onacted from time %0 t$,me.l- le-. andArdg AjMd Bar, The following sp�!eg cfff?c restrictions shall apply to the us,% Of Who Site pursuant to this Davalopment A, greement:- a,. Only residential uses of th6 real property shall be Permitted iii the 'Zkoject; b- Th 4 maximum density of�residential-elWelling units in the Project Lhall never be gre4t-ar than 35.05 dwolli;zq Ur.lts �per acre; 7 A C. T2* maximum height for the highest Proposed building _ in the. Project small be Lift 11 -five (53) feet; d. Sias maximuaR „size for all t1vA bas ldings and the propostpd square footage for each of the �partm�nt rGypesr located s.ts that Project shall be as sat:' orth jxhibit �►�� ,fn attached hereto,? and ee The Provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes are contained in the conditions 'for approval-:"of Development "Review 87 -33. 19. ve. ap -,snt r gAat j jje L The City All grant Developer the i'oilawinp d4bvoloprAnt incentives for der�alopment of the project: a. The maximums densit r y,. �" �ci��on the sits shall be � increased to 33005 AwriM"`nq units per store; / b. The maximma number of r- -Vired off- si;reet parking spaces shall be lowered 'to one (1) space parr dwelling unit; and C. City requiretents fos covered parking Ispaces shall be waived in their . ri.tirety. 20. Proi ct p2sig Mme 3tias g-- . -- Rr The Project open apace,. buildings and individual apartments shall, be designed with physical amenities catsring to the needs and desires of the senior citizen residants. in addition to those conditions met forth in Exhibit Mgh hereto, the following physical amenities,_ shall be substantially included in<.the Pr:ojact: a. Pl'evator service shall bm provided to all upper story Ilpartmentss; b. All units shall be desi r.ad,for handicap 9 p _ <,. c. All units shall possess secured entryways off a , common +enclosed ballwayt d . Handrails shall be provicko -4 in all hsllways: e. Building sparse shall be davcted for tenant group nseetingi; and p - i f • �sczeatf4nal amena�sm shall include', but not l mit0 to, put :-inq greens abd shuffleboard courts. 21, hd tnni 'rya° , Developer agrees to-and shall hold City and_4ts elected officials, officers, agent's- ` and employees ,, ii 6 16K) 0 Q IN � i% o 0 ° U a► kip " 1 C) Cd ° 'U 'a Jre , k tpj iw 0 43 to ,H N'H4J m4j lW'�, 144j, 't%1 ."'�'� Q m y,. m.0 m p o -� •o. . malWglJNMq WUk °AI .0 ° OQ �1JrPr4Wgp A DO °.0 94 A4 E!!m•Q�a W m k1~ U ' ORM wo ' sPk c to o W e1 k k iA+ FV x A A ®•.1 a m J:" q as m� NA ij iJ = N t7+>r rt �1LU Mti3 W '-iN a 9 ma ow,0y,1aMR1 W¢'aN•�rd 0� 4m SY.w m 1111 p 4 iJ k k C► 't7 is R! O' LL m ij 77 k.iJ O � W W m R; q O iJ •1j 04 V . Rt.1~' tJ Q Q "t �. OaalJVi a0Mmk�°mgm kO� Mi '17 'IFa.�.g9kj0U Q Q >,; ri �d q q U Ri C1 so 44 � N 9 a W & m a U a M M=F 0 a W`H e q k iJ R. ak► vai -IN 01 13 LW V V 'Ci �.t 9 = iJ'Cl 0 17 C: 0 V M � � r +� '$ � k i1 ly a R1 k` - o'"Im,A4,ivN0k �19p Q.,�1� y v�J� 1JiMlm� k ii41 Mr♦ UxmaN1JriCRaA14 0AW 1aCit >;N4Jk!C�a4� 4 Nf1� P4 40 AA a 4 ° u ro � 1 1-4" ®'Q k 13 � u =-, V o-fi (V (Vitt `0 V .s• a �a, � 4J a � caro m r,4 a 4rk ON •"� w1 l � =kRN M 1 q v + + 7 i Rti e ''b.�1UN tl "y Ab pp.n c t sI p gia j 0 N l,t> N® af�- .K ia�Y , tk f :e4� k: ��t ` i ++i -fl �. liN l4a` IN- P l i N3C41 n J q M irs Fo i �V 0:g41 fNN o iAM �tm •.M U '" - N r M t ,' , UH A„ Mro SQ �UeV G 1 ',•@ 4 ak . mv Rt'�q' � .�- a r ° Miy� M , • . ro m A1G3., y Ja 1 � .L i I A U ,f+ • W , q � i - Q4 b� ON &#,(M yRUGN y g °NmC CAb q U=,- t 9 =li p w�.a O kb, .a mtoN O a tQ1J •r M o a � J Q" O ld 1M Ri'C in ago 1J iJ 104 - 4 A o k m OM m " A p U{ A u M kmo .jiJ •1 ; l I j J 1� O if harmless from liability for damage or •claims for damage fors, personal injuries, including death, and claims for property damLg'e which may arise from the drat ., or indirect, operations of Developer or those of his contractor, 1- :abcontractcr, agent, employes or other person acting on hiv,7�4"lf which relate, to the Project. Developer agrees to and shag. defend City and its elected officials, officarn, agents and employeea:;saith respect to actions for damages caused or alleged to lave been caused by reason of Daveloper°s activities in connection with the Project This hold harmless(,prcvision`` Plio* to all damages and claims for damage suffered or allesg to hSeve, been suffetO by reason of the operations referred to in this Development Agreement-, regardless of whether or not the City prepared, supplied or approved thU plans, specificatrcns or othetr documents for the Project. _ 22. &%*ndments, This Agreement may be .4*nded or 'tmnctaled, in whole or in part, only by mutual written Onmont of the parties and thew in the ahanner provided for in Ca fornia Government Code Sections Gem at seq. J 23. `lnforoement.. In the event of a default u"er the provisions AL of this,_ Agreement by Developer, City sshal7, give written notice to Develop`. ,r (or its successor) at the address of the Project, and by :registered or certified mail addressed to the address stated in this Ajxeenent, and if such violation is not corrected to the reasonable satisfaction of City within thirty (30) days after such notice is given, or if not corrected within such ,reasonable tima as may be required to cure the breach or default if said breach or deZaul€: cannot be cured within thirty (30) days (provided that acts to curs;�the breech�,or default 'must be commenced within said thirty (30) days and must thereafter be diligently pursued by Develcper), then City may, without furt'ar notice, declare a default, under this Agreement .and, upon anv such declaration of default, City may bring any action necessary to specifically enforce the obligations of Dayslopet growing out of the cparation of this Davelopmsnt Agrsaxent, apply to any court, state or federal, for injunctive relief against: any violation bt Developer of any provision of this Agreement, or apply for such other relief as may be appropriate, \ _ 24. Z'vent g,C stilt. Developer is in default under this Agreement upon the happening of one or more,of the following events or conditions•, a. If a material warranty, representation or statement ` is r„ade or furnishad by Developer to City and.is false or proved to have been false in any material d respect when it was made; \ j C 1) b. If a finding and deter3ainotion is mad* by a city following can annual rani *tW , Pursuant to paragraph 12 h *reinaelsov* u : p , a rile f substantial avideenco I t!Mt Develop*." has not comgl% in cord faith with { MAY material tarmac nd conditi%�k of this Agreement. Il after notice and opportunity to fu 3s described in paragraph 23 herainabove or. C. A breach by Dovelope:; of any of - a provisions or terms of this Agreement, after noti�!- and opportunity to curt as provided in paragraph 231*ereinalbove'. 25• H Waiver Stf 8emadieslF-) city dates not waive any claim of defect in performance by DavIloper,if on periodic review city, does not enforce or termiti , i this Agnate OlAt. Nonp*rformance by D_veloper &hall not be *x1:=%*d because p *rforganco by Daii- eloper, { of the obligations herein contained would he unprofitable, difficult or Gxpenmive. or because of failux•e of any third party or entity, other than city, All Othees raseedies at lair or in equity which aro not othorwist provi.04 for in. this Agree fit or in City's regulations govorning d*Volopxont agrawwnts'ar* available to the parties to pursuet in the event that there is a breach of this Develc,pzsnt Agrertamen,�-� No waiv*r .lay city of any breach or default under this Daveloia�te�nt Agiia'sment shalt, be ` deemed to be a waiver o,, any other subsequent broach thereeof or default hereunder. 26. Rights" �jt Ic t�S+ i�E qOdSX =JA AOX922ent. Should Da ej��aer place or cause to be placed any encumbrance or Lien on tile' Prajectf or any part thereof the beneficiary .!"Lender") of say encumbrance or llr%.., including, but not Limited to, moit,gages —? shEll hav& the right at any time during the term of thin , :' Agreement and the 43xi" tenceaf of said encumbras, acne or lien ?' O— a. Do any act or thing r *guixtad of Developer under ��Ysis Agr**Xant, : and any such act or tieing done or peribrmed by Lauded: jalall be as *ffectiva as if done by Developer itseelf t b. Res&lize on the sscurit;� afforded by the encumbrances or lion by exercising foreclosure proceedings or po;rer of _ saga or other rer - iy afforde ,' n law or in *quit*, oir by the security doczmont cvidencinq the encumbrance or lien (hereinafter x!Aft ;red' to as "the trust tlledr') ;' C, Transfer, co»voy or asai;�n, the title, of olvelciper tom' the PVOJaot to any purchaser at any foreclosure sale wstether tor„ foreclosure alit a bee conducted'` pursuant tl cgVrt ordear or pursuant to a power of sal@ erZ.,A dined in a trust deed; and r d. Ac gut ire and' acucceed t 1 ..o this into te��• t of Developer Lby _ virtue of any foreclosure asa lft w�ther `tha for clarjur ► sale be cor'dUcted pursuazit�it�.- A court ardor or pursVant to a power of sale contaih in a trust !` deed. 37'• NSti ![ raSi X. city shall give writj�.`e notice of ey�y default or broach tWUr this Agreement by prop y A` r to iender,.anst afford, Le)Aaor the opportunity afrer«�servict) of the notice."/It o t e a. Curt the breach or default within thil-ty (n ) lays after service ce "Said notice, who the „default can ,. be cured b the a '. -- y p ya�stnt, c� money, b. curs ,the breach or defauI t r 3th :thirty (30) `dales' afteae sctvlce of -said tot�i_e vherje that breach or default can be cured by xomwthing other than I•h* payment of money and can be cured Within tat' time; or, - A c: Cur,& the breach or default in such reasonable time \� f as may be required whereoaethinq other than , pay=_,nt of money is rests reed to au= the breach or default and cannot be” psrformed 'within thirty (30) days alter said notice, provided thai:, ac ts to. cure the breach or de u3 ». a a co=y. -MA` Vithin a thirty,,(30) lday period after-=; rvice of-, said notice a1 default on Lender by City and are thereafter diligently continued bY,-)�ender. 28. by Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, a:'Z.nder may forestall any action:, by city for a breach or default under the terms of this Agreement by Developer 1t by commencing P �- ceedings to foreclose its:enoumbrance or lien >on the Project. The proceedings sa commenced may be fdjr foreclosure of the encumbrunce,by order of court �6r for foreclosure of the al encumbrance under j, Qwer of sale eo;ttain*d ±n the instrumennt, Cj creating the encumb;:ance or lien. The proceedings shall ;;%at however, forestall any such action b VAO C t breach by Developer unlcosi y y for the default or a. The',! are�ommenced within thin v service, on Lender of th Y (3ai Lays after abave, xic ice d � scr +bcd herein -:� b . => b« ,,Thay' arc. after I "having bean commenced„ diligently andY law to cOMPl�etion; iursued in the manner required b J f c. Lander kgepo and peroms 411 of the farms, covenant and co nP" ono of this Agreement reem:ir ng the paytont or eitpe it of monosy by Developer until the darec� sur* proceedings ara complete or" rw'1180harged bar .redemption, satisfaction or payment. 29, F£.+ on =. In coneiderat an for the ;tzitutions herein provided, City agrees that it s� ill not, lord keg the term l- of. this kgreement, take any action, the ff'ect of whi ;h will be to cc ntxol, determine . or affect tF1'ei rents, for Apartment units located In the.prolact., - l 30, Notice. Any-notice required to be givedn ay the teerms e:2' this Agreement xh,t ll be provx.ued by cartiZied mail,, return receipt requested j at the address ox' the respective 'partials as- ' specified below Or at any Other such rddreess may be -as lataV specified by thra parties hereto. To Developer: TAc Develapmenn Corporation _j Attention: To city: City of Rancho Cuctimongai 9320 Bast Linea, Suite C, = P.O. Box 507;, :. rancho cucam&lga, Ctalif4rmia 91730 J� A tq tion: uren Wasserman, City Manager 31, Attornevse+ am. In nny pxoceaed$ngrs g from t$� . enforcement of this Dev�clopment Agreement ;,r because .nf an alleged broach or default hereunder, the prevailing party shall be entitled to r1ecover its costs and its reasonable attorneys' v, fees incurred during the proceeding as may be fixed scithin the discretion the of court: f 32. Binding = - This Agreement shall bind,- and th a bane: �s�) and burdens hereof sh-a, l inure to, the respective pertias heie and their legal repress?catives,-.exccutors, administrators, - ,;successors rend assigns, wherever the context irequires or ;0d_�ts, _, .. Anne ; cabZ , ( phis A�Freemten2: shall bej construed, i'2 - xcordance with Ind � f.letned,by tn* laws bf tie e'as`e G� llifornia. ih� �• l fie 12 C1 A 34. JAY• If any provisions oil this Agreszefi shall betd re[ to b iWalid, illegal or. unsnfoicr ablai r'ho .. validity, lsgak$ty or 'snforc"bilitl *' of tia mairainc ro�r3ai�a hereof shall not in any way be effected ar impaired tbereby6•- 35. r - Msc�k�3S2II« This Agreement shol , .at the sxgsnae „�,� Developer, ias r+ecafiisei i:Y the gfstici l Bac0r.4 s of the County Recorder of the County of '3eR Berardino. r IN fi3;VMSS WifiUOFr this, AT.- asmant ias been executed by., :a them Pa' tiss And shall be effeciiva on the of esctiv w date set forth tiara#nabovs. CITY OF jjNCHo CUC1 ROy5 F T3eists s K stau Er yor jm TAC ABVELOmw coRPoxATioy�._. IL Dated: Dated: $� i _ STATE OF CALIFORNIA as. COUNTY OF I BERNARDINO ] On , l9$8 � bGX* 'e ear the Undak'ei fined, a Notary "liG ?i anti for e�ti+d Count��; ,&nd Statex a personally y appeared prortra3i a s ors” the basin of satisfactary ev�re e''�s k,;s this �Sarsr�:s �sr�at� +�tec�tted ih,is ,instrument as,, Mayor of t17 CI 1 OF dCtiO ` C47t:WoNG� f a municipal corporation +ss. fisting and organ eti uns�er ghe Xsws of +pas *taat+� of California, and acknouledgete t;i�e that time CI`l`Y of PANCiio CUCP. ONGA executed fit. N+ ' „ ` Pt�b23d i anoi fob said 5ta:e . .1 77 u ti , C STATR Or count' or on x9�i8� k t4rek ! the ut�srsic�nod, a xotazp F a n a yr 0 + Caunt�• art ftikto, par"nallll appeared and prov*d tsk -., on Ui k �f_,cr a *a tozy rev ds�ta a th 11 parstt�na wko ��tad thin :�ns��a�ee►.lt as ..�_ ea!? TAG t':V i N'1' CoRf;ajo,TioH Arid acknOWledged t4 at th:;t uu `A; rot icarae are - 44thorixtKI beehtir of such acrporatiom sta S \134 \DATAC 14 i = i f 1�1 N oursis Of�Agalopm— fit ®r -,4335 E, Lowell. luffe 6�,O nTie. i, A 91781 1Aj 3A9- 3527. ! March 1 1983 ` lYF'TAT:M!Pig� c1u,Sci a w* �Htl1Mr. 5ruce Cook —1 ,RANG Aso•: atra Planner,, Citq of ut cha L'xtr a ga f 9124 Haaelfae Road � P.O. Box 807 MAR OZ-*88 Rancho cucamongn, CA 91�; °G t�r ylitl l �c f Re.' lAevef4nt Agreement 97!-D2 fit �'11or Citizen Housing Project, Baseline(:end Archjb`�# Dear Mr. Cooks .bank you i!vr meetirgi `5h ue to dis muss than 170 unit , 8atii A �t�cat Project. r As discussed in our csee€frigo�J,KAV 64-1988 va woMM Tura!, to request „tha following chcngau ism thn T1adQZb pmeut Agaess�ant draft for thernfar fStfzen Housing Projccr 1. The terms of 3- r:z4raent to be twenty {��) yoors. ;• The Lew 7.14vxse Requirements: it is Gus <tit%ierstanding that only 25T of the pion, act ±seers to be anted to low in�.oten q"&Uft A tenants. out, �.equan that no tsate than 50% be- =vented to , q0' »ified teaant� He feel that'there ara m4ay'dezexV�na rebid a irc theA:ity of Rancho; t;uca¢nnly ;ta4[o spould .Iika,;td be IIL tF Ls senior j roiact,;, .'but whom �tcaulc� be prohibited fggm -Xivi£- in this �srojart because tiey are not qualifies$ due to low tneons requirements. 3. In a;,ea.s of enfortasment of default of provisions oft ',e�tlopment agretunt we request a ninety (94} day ti= period for- O a +reloper and lends* to curb said defsulta. 4. War reVest tb-St uMtr £ift�-five (55) years of age tenants y-occupy Units Is tdaporary tenants for a period not to exceed €our 1'4} months during any 'calendar year. f, 5. As it clarification co the refeara rice that tha units Ito a 0signed for handicap access, tsars refers to the fact that et , btt%ldi� s �tii tray elavators which maktk, the units a�:x�,gssbh7�ei £�;,every,4�e LAC C_udsttg tt�e elderfy and 3tsnd c4”' - Tt s $area not xposan tf' at all _n .t# r li designed for handi p people. sat'tieukerly becr, -444 "tints tja� ea tae units aMLffiets t to'be ut�Xized by non -btndicap �peiritns. _ AWL 5. We request first minor chetzgeri to the footprint or `eis"it fait 's)r, tcPatcd > as L planning staff matter Sipattre1y Zml w _ Tlourae U tqo-Iopcegp : �?o. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUVON OF TOE RANCW_CUr,AMONBA PLANNIK CrVISSION , I RECOMMENDINa APPROVAL OF (REQUEST TO AMEND THE- LAND USE KAP OF THE GENERAL PLAN, CPA 87 -0444 FROM LOW- MEDIUM! RESIDENTIAL (44 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO OFFICE FOR A J 1.69 ACRE RAP:tik . LOCATED 0`! THE NEST SIDE OF, ARCHIBALD + AVEVE, .SCUTN 6F BASE LINE ROAD, , PANCHO CUCAMONG. A CALIFORNIA, AND PAS FINDINGS IN SVPPORT THEREOF y;~ ;. l A, Recitals. (I) nest End Investments has filed an &rpliiitiva, .ir General Flan �mtnent 87 -04H as doscribed in the title of this 'Ee3otutiaati. Hereinafter In 1� dais Resolution, the sutje t General Pea F `Aeenaent is reforr+:d to as "The AppBicaxicn." (ii) On 'Mr —,h 25, aJ88, ^fie PizVfiiaq Com�issioh of the Caty of 1 Rzarhe Cvc,amonga conddcted a. duly noticed ph61Q hearing ult The Application and concluded sai4 hitarino on that date.' i (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of thfs resolr.Lilpn 4ave occurred. B. ResoR utii:�n^ f NOW, THERFF09E, it i,, beroay ,found, determined, and y by the Planning COUnissiar or ¢,ha -,4ii y of Ra�:ho CucA*ongo as f0lows- 1 Thds Commission hereby specifically finis that all of the facts i set forth n the racitals, Part A, of this Res&3ufiEon are true and: correct. ?. Dated upa substantial evidence gar- f:ented to this CoMission during tho above - referenced pubic 141yi inq on March 2s, 1988, including written and oral staff rel+ort`s, ,4r public tnstianccny, this CA=Ission hereby specifically 'Inds a gI'Ylow; (a)' The App►i,1±vod apples -fo a 1.69 acre parcel of land ba€,.eally rectano,ular in conf _ *,at ;on, located an the -rest side of eych1bald Avenue, south of Base: Lire Road-, Safd proorty is currently designated as Long- Medium Raesiden ftl (4 -8 dwelling *Ats per acre ) on the Laced' Use Map of the Geneval Man and is Gvrrentiy leveloped with an older tingle family residence and se+eral sanalai: stcraga structure'; acid (b) ia prvgorty to t,,a .jjorth of the �subjam site is designated Heignborhe.A ;Cna�r� al �, th6 iaild Use 'Ap :of Gener! Plan end consists of a neighbov�; sh (ng, center, the property sr `'the south,.:�p the subject_ sib ; ?nar Residential (4 dwelting uni +s per 'l tie t.:na3 %� b -� ;Plan andvonsists of low def4ity r amily resi`dertial, iteL to the," fast is designated ss ere +Shborhood C(mercidl and Low W04o�,,. U -4 dwelling �� is per acre) on the Land Use 1*1P Of the 3eneral Plan sists of 'a neigh6 rhood comerciat - PLta'�f1liiG COl�lISSIl1bi R��,tITiDN i�(1. Y., -�, Page Z the 'Pi and low density shag le fMily residential, and the p�tap�rry to the cast �s dbsic ated Lax.: - dita Rdsdden, ,Ial (4-8 dwelling unite per acre) on � L the Land L' 'se iiap of the General Flan(,aw -4 L n:.tsts of v caxt laud Znd Cci ` i7�d a ply do rOquarts the"Amendment O axe Land lls i Of et a General Plan free 0di ,testdctxtia t =6 duelling units per air fOr the 1.0 rrt- parcel t::..401tei &and _ (d) The''J ptieatian ,would be consistemp with the La�d�Gsa Rlownt of the General Plan„ old a*ot x�sult ice polyentraily' s gmxicUse adverse impaGLs to personsZ,and' PrTiea *� , p she irinity of the . subject site, and i pultt -In fi�a't eat' itxt�i�ests of heaith, Safetyk��and welfare of the citi�ns of the Cfiy1f Wche Cucamn'ga. 3. Qas6d upon the 'Olbsuntiahvtdence pra�r►t`fed to this! 60mission aai ng the a #dtte -rfe'q[ed pLTfit taritxg and rxpono s r ia:'i adins of j fact set forth In p ,sir : hs 11 and t-l'above, this - CeW1ss6n hereby finds and j o cent lucIes that th 1 r,�pNAion xxo�,14 be �.biisistent with the objectives a file (l J t Land Use El rot ,41 tkt, "r*maral Plan, sUld be it -the bast` i0tetvsts f the City of Yranch� r Crrc� Onga- ,and"VOu'�d �arctPct the i z0t� -, safety; a04 wel fire o f 7E?�3�'2°$ of R,*, ho t+iiwAlAgn9a caFif�Drnia 4 ;/ In co"Jueetton wftfi` 179ti )�pplicition, an ,h1tial Study/ Arai sf»?.- txvir4°xtttsl A #ss� ass,nf,ity with iite t ,tiretxt wFth the California Enviret tal - Q+�ttlt c *_ 'has been prepared. The C i t 1- has due err kid that ,�fa �r�siect 100 x t have a significant "adverse effect [. on the onv$rgnaterat, ,end Y the finding of no significe� ilo, tot aad the issuance , a �i% atitse Cpl titan they _Cfl�� M9rancil . - 5. 9Wred' Upao the fiAdi�ggr�l and tonclusi'ons set f&%O � in pay aq�aphs xa and i1 a�cve, this cc isd.`,on ttee'eby rtco ends 8 prev f p • al o£ ' fife pplicatiGn arid, irect K�tat a! certified ce jr of '4h Resa axtlon and rgoted c! teriar be for,vard44 to tine City council for final - i�etec tinatiorr. 61 The Deputy Secretatl► tO �fhfi certify "to the adoption Of this ResaaYat Tol. APPROVED AND ADoPTEO TH14 23RD t-' bF Xk C", 1988. PLANKING COwISjIOH OF ` N ',Ctl`►° OF CFtD Cl:CAMDtdGA ICY^ arry F3e""t Orman ""``^ --- "` st er,"tiapu, acre ar'j°-.t.�.� �glgv� � c MIN RjEESb PT(ION M. , PAT - T, Brad Rul tic tary'?f �he Aanrting cwairsion of tte�Eiilr Rancho -,C- 0csmonga, da hereby certffi Oct-the foreltoiii� Resolution ryas t 7y ��� f, ;•,> ' replarrly , €ntro�du -44, 'Basted, 'arid adopted by ' th Planning Gc city, of ka'rlkho yucam0gai-ate regular meting of the Planniit� �'o ion, held on titd 23x4 ,day Of'keh, YOB, by the folloxl V vote»to- itdf," , 1 f' Wks; �?pr�IsS� Ens: ASSENT: CC1MISSI N(ERS: it l' li i l if '1 r f, ice, 'j A RESOLUTION OF THE RNICHO CUCAMONGA PLANNINE COMI$SION REM PENDING DENIAL OF A REQUEST TO MEND THE LAND` USE MAP CF THE GENEnAL - PLAR, GPA 87.044, FROM LOW MMUM. RESIDENTIAL (4 -6 owELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO OFFICE VR A 1.69 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARC418ALD AVENUE, SOUTH OF BASE LME ROAD, c--UNCHD CU C 10NGA, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKE FINDINGS IN, SUPPORT THEREOF i A. Recitals. i) hest End IP40stments has filed an applicat4p for General Plz: Amendment 87-04H as describi in the title--of this Resolutfoo. - Hereinafter`in this Resolution, the :lubdect General Plan Amendment is ri!Arred to as "'The Application. (ii) Nt ft- lvh 23, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City, of Rancho Cucamonga :onlucted a duly noticed public hearing on The Application and concluded said hearing on that date, (iii) All legal prerequtcites to the adoption of this ;Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. _l NOR!, TLiEREFORE, it Is hereby found, ,determinedj and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rahcho Cucanwo2a as frlilows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds .ghat all of the facts set forth in the Recitals:, Part A, of this Resolution are -true and correct. � f 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission I during the above - referenced public hearing or March 23, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this. 7 Commissia,n hereby specifically finds as follows: j (a) The Application gplies to a 1.69 acre parcel of land basically rectangular in 41,onfigurationi located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south Of Base Mill Road.; Said property is currently designated as Low- Med,unr Residential { "nLt dwftlling units per`acrO on the Land Use Map of the Genera`. Plan and is currently developed with an 'oldev single family residence and several smaller storage structures; and (b) The property to the north of the tubject site is designated Neighbor ood Co- rcial on the Land 'Use Map., of General Plan and consists of a neighbor�iaod commercial shopping center, e 1:voperty to the' south of the subject sits. -)s designated Log Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) on the Land Use, 'v of the General Plan and consists of low density ' single family residentiar;' the property to the east' is designated as Neighborhood. Commercial and Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling uni14s, per atraj on the Land UsL-`Map of the General plan and coosifts of'a neighborhood commercial shopping center and loan density single '#`;: 'Illy residential, and the property to { 0. PLANNING COMMISSION PESOLUTIO 4 W. GENERAL PLAN lNW+iENT 8744H March 23, 13 _Page, the west is designated Lowy- Hedius Residential i4-8 �fweiling`un$tA p M acre) on: the Land Use i�iap of the General plan Consists and otr:Yaeant land; and_ The Application requests the Amen nt of the Land Use trap of the General Flan froar Low- radium Residential (4-8 dwelling unfits eera) for 'acre the 1-60 per parcel to Office; and Idl The Application would not be zonSiSter4Z with the Land Use Element of the General Plan. and would not be in }he best Interests of the hgaith, safefiy, and welfare Of the citizens of the City of P,apcbo Cucax�,nga by further extending undesirable _r*_rpSid,ential uses into an exfstiq and established residential neighborhood, 3. -upon the substantial evidence presegedd to this comission during the aboir,-.y *ferenced public hearing and upon the ,,pecific finoir.45 of fact Set forth :n �aragra4hs I and 2 above. this cQm tore i�ereby finds and concludes that the applica' ion Kould Yot be gonsistent th the ob$xctivs$_o. the Land Cie 8lerwd;`jt of the General Plant, would not be 14 the best interests Zf the City, of RanCno Cuca ga, and would not protect the health, S 0 and ` wrifare of the citizens of Rancho Cucat6ngal. California. 4. Based ,upon tie findings end Conelosi6nS we",. forth in. paragraphs 1, 2, and 3.above, thft C fission hereby rice rds denial of The Application and directs that $ certifimd dopy cif this Resolution and related teat*_ i-Uj be . forwarded to the City Council .for final determination. rip 5. The Ufpu3 satae, *„o __' e- mmission shalt certify toy; the adoption of this Resolution. t ,1 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD Ak-�, OF WC�, Igo$. PLANNING CD*XSSILIR of 111E CiT"v 4P fifB ICHO COCAMORCA BY; ` aMry e : aratati ATTEST; - 1, Brad Buller, bQWY Secretary of the planning comfpgloa of the City 04, Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolutiti- w4s duly an'.i regularly introduced, pissed, and aftoted by the planning .Cc -" _.�+4ss'ion of the Cit„T of Raochojtuca tnga,:at a regular meeting of the Planning C=s*Sin» held On the 23rd da,�ti of RarCh, 1988, by the fa7lawitt vote�to -wit: AYES: C15: hIGES� �rti�FISSIDNk�iS: ' . Xt'ENT: %�C{1Fe9I11St}NErCS; ;I 1 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO COCA, PLANNING -OMMISSTON RECOMENDIK APPROVAL �OF A REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVEL1, WENT DIS11 CT MAP, ODD 87 -06, FROM- LOW- WW *01! RESIDENTIAL (4- 9'`DNELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TU'i)FFICEI 19OFESSIONAL FOR A 1.64 ACRE (PARCEL LOCATED Oil THE NEST SIDE OF ARCHIPALD +' , YENUE,. SOUTH OF BASE LINE ROAD, RANCW CUCAMOtiGA CALI THEREOF F! RNIA, M K4KE FINDINGS IN SUPPORT , A. Itecitals: (i) hest End :iriVestmehrs has filed an application for Iievelopadt District Amendment 87461' as describod. in the title rV this 'Resolution. Hereinafter in this Res4ition, the sOject DOV415- t District Amendment is referred to as "The Application." (it) On 23, ',9M, A,the Planning Commivlon of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conduct 01 a 64V ..noticed pubFio hearing on Yne Application and concluded said rearing' on ±hAt d!ttsw _ (iii) All legal, prerequisites to the adoption of thit Restilution ha;ia occurred. Q. Resolution. t ri. THEREFORE, ;kt. & hereby found, deteralmd, and res 07ved by the Planning COMft -Sion of th4i City of Rancho Cucamonga a follows; !' i. This CC,vissioa, `hereby speci f filly finds that all 0 the facts set forth in the Recitals, Pail A, of this Resolution.. *re true and correct. f 2. Based upon subs4ntial evidence presented to this Commission during [ the above- referenced public hearing on March 23, 1938, including written and J oral staff reports, together wl" public testimony, this Commission hereby f specifically findi, as follows: (a) The ltpalic�ttt�niippl:es to a 1.69 acre parcel. of land basically rectangular in configuration, locatedbn the, kest side of Archibald Avenue, south of ease Lin) Raad, Said property is cu( +rently desig aced as Lou-Medium Residential 14-3 dwelling units per acre) on th,,% Oevelnpr nt Ois.trict Map and is cuNrently! developed with an older sinal fAmily residence and several smaller storAge structures; and (b) The property to the north of the; ,subs kt site is designated F,19hborhood Ctwercial Nn the Development R3stHct Vip and consists of a neighborhood c eecial flopping center, the _property t9 the south of :the `7 subiect site is dezignateid Low. Residential (Z-4 dwelling Units per acre) on the development District. Map an�i cnhsists of low 4 nsity single family), resIdential, the property to the east is designated as Neighborhood P-O"rcial . and 11w Residential (2 � ;iwsi ;{ing tplis per acre) on the Beve�apmen ,�Di §triat 6� 11' W11 PLANNING COWISSIOMi RESOLUTION NO. } DEVELOMENT DISTRICT ANEWMENT 87-06 March 23, 1 Page Map and consists`of a neighborhood cox. ,tial shopping center and low density single family res{dentfal, and the property to the west fs des�tgnated Low-.r'., V*diun Residential (0-8 dwelling units per acre)" on tl4e Dsaelopment District' Map and consists of vacant land; and fc te- Application requests the Amendment of the Develop"nt' District Map fr0A Low- -t its Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Off4,.ce/Professioto4l for the 1.69 acre; parcel, and of the General The Applicat6onp would be consistent meth the land Use Ebert in potentially significant adverse Impacts ter. {persons and proper) % the i+wttediate 'v1cU4ty of the subject site, _ and would be in the best interesta of the health, i0aty, and welfare of the citizens of.the C14 of Rancho Cuva"Aona. ; 3. Based wagon the substantial eYiyance P re3ltnted to this Commission during the abort- referenced public hearing and upon the spe6ificc,findings of !I fact set , forth n paragraphs 1 and 2 a%ve„`- his CoekIssion- hereby finds and III concludes that the appTiCAtion would be consistent with the ob actives of the Lind Use Element of the General Plan, would be in tile best i�t.;$ ebts of the j safety, ,a= €4 welfare of City of Rancho G c a, and i�xtld a:�o *mot the heal tlii the Citiz� t of 4ncho Cuco anga Califarnfs,, =` 4. In conjunction' with The Application, an Initial Study, PrelIminary W i Environmental Assessment, in conformity- with the requirements. with' -`the California Envirenmental :Qt►ality Act, as be<n prepared: The Ct ntss #on has dater:arned''ithat this n the en- lro lnkkt, and hereby recoa+mends the finding Cf rta SignlfRc i „a�pact r• and the�is Vance of :,a Y.egative Declaration by the City Counc37. _ c .;. ; 5. Based,,uport the fittdirgs artd canGltisians sek'�#orih in pragraphs i, 2, and 3 above, `'#! -$ Cotwetission 3rereby recpaatendc a►�;; �tal' of 3he..Applicatian and direct: thall a certified colfy of this Rtnolutiom and related material forwarded to the City Council for fiahl deter ►ina i rr. 6. The Deputy ep reta to this Co„ )otissioi y ► 1 shall yert*fy to thC' adoption of th1s, ('esolution APPR0VED AM ADWYE`' THIS 23RD DAY OF MARCH, 1986. , PLANUING CM hJE GI'TY OF RANCHO CUC i!c!4 $Y: al rman ATTEST* 1' 1: El RESOLUTION NO, A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCA140FAA !PLANNIX COMMISSION RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF A R"eQ "SST TO AhEtS- THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP, ODA 87 -04, FROM LOV- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (44 SWELLING, UNITS PER A'LRE) TO OPTIC PROFS S101k, ;.FGR -A 1.64 ACRE PARCEL LOCATi'D ON ThE WST SIDE OF ARWISALD AVENUE, SOUTH FT BASE 'LINE RCKJ, RANCHO CUCfAW4A, CALIFORNIA., AND . W FINDINGS IN SUPpCRT THErEOF A. Racitals. (i) West End I�vfstmentt has riled an application f „3r Development District Amandment 87 -06 as described in the title of this p, oluiion. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Deveiopmtt;nt District .Alme49t s referred to as "The Application.,' a (if) OR March 23, 1948, the Planning Omission of the �.,ity of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a dull? noticed public heaving orr The Application aivri concluded said hearing on tha'c date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the ad'ryption of thin Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution, NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the Ci'iy of.Rancho Cecaemonga as follows, 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all -t-2” facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true And Corl*t. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during . the above - referenced public�,;oarino on March 23, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together wft6 public testimony, this Commission ;ereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The Application applies to a 1,69 acre parcis! of land basically rectangular in configuration, located on the west side of Archihal -d Avenue, south of Base Line Road. Said property is currently designated ai Low- 'r'edium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) or the Development Distri t Map and is currently develvped viith an older single family residence and, eeveral smaller storage structures; and V (b) The property to the north of the s0of ittE is designated Neighborhood Cowercial on the Development Distric,Lj� P and consists .of a neighborhood commerce ,1t shopping center, the prorrrty to the so►tth of the subject site is designated Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling Emits per acre) on the Development District -Kap and consists of for density single family'f residential, the property to the east is designated ay kilghborhood 01aaercial'`, and Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) on the Development District Map and consists of a neighborhood commercial shopping center t low density single family residential,. and the property 'to the west is ;ignated Lout- PLANNING C"ISSIGR RESOLUTION_40. DEVELEXT DISTRICT AME04ENT 87 -06 F1arCCs 23, 1588 Paget Medium Resid€ntlal i4 -8 dwelling units per acrep an th e ;aeyelioc nt District flap and consists of vacant'land; and j tcl The . lica ion re App �eMts the A�riu�ent of ��lee Development District Map from Low- Nedica� rleSidCt� lar. d-8 :*elljjg units—per acre) to � { Office /Professional for the 1.69 acY'�= }tia7e1; and ids —he AppTicatirn would not ,br.�anaistent with, the Land) Use Element of the � ineral Plan,, and would not-be in the best interests of the health, safety, and welfare of the o^itizens of the C`..Zy of Rancho Cucamonga By 1 further extending urdestrahie not -tree tdentW established residential aeighhortiood.. uses into, an existing and j 3, Based upon t-hel Substantial eviderce presented to this Commission during the above- refemw.ed public hearing j..nd upon the specific f J 1 1 nding� of fact set fort. in paragraphs I and 2 above' this tcvmission hereby' finds avea concludes that the application, wOU13 not he consiste,4 with the objectives of the Land Use Element of the General .Pan. - mid aot b ifr-,the b ;it Intey^ests Of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and 46uld not - protect: `" health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Ranchq Cucamonga, California. ! 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth In paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission- ,!hereby recommonds denial of The Application and direct, that a certified copy of this Resolution ;,rd related material be JJJ forwarded to the City Council for final S. The Deputy S- creury to this Commission shall car"fy to_ zhe adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD eAY OF MARCH, 1988. ! PLANNING COWISSiON OF THE C TY OF WCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. MRiel, ChaiTiRift ATTEST; Brad Dep u y e°ecre y I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Plannin Cow$;sit:, of tht :� City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby ertif • that they ote&ing Resolution was dulj and regularly introduced, ;it ed, ard�adopted b Wty Planning, Cotmaissien of the Cite of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular sheeting of the Planning Commission hold on the 23rd d {r of WNW, 1988, by'the,foJ -lowing vote- to-wft; AYES: COWISSNNERS: COM SSIONER i. ABSENT. COWISSIONERS: a .. East. — Shopping centor and vacant; Neighboftod Comercial and Low-ftdfiim Residential (4=6 dwelling units per Acre). -- -- 1 C;iT x Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA 6 2-) STAFF REPORT - Single family residential; low Resideptial -(2 -4 dwelling units per acre).. _ D. _GeneralP74r, .etions: -ft-mte"' -G "medlm`Residential t4 -8 dwelling units per, DATE: March 2�9t8 0 i 145 "? To: Chairman }'a"d N eleas of the Planning Coemission North - Neighbatood Copmercial. FR€X- . J Brad 80ler, City Planner o South BY: Scott Murphy, A!�bc4te Planner l� East - tWjhbo ood Commercial and Low4%diuia Residential- SUBJJECT: }EN1iaR0lP£lF AL ASSESSMENT AM DEVELONWKT REVIEW 67 -3& - (4 -8 dwelling units per acre). � The ve o; ' o /senior �. Nest apat s on .Acres of� la in the L ,; ium Residential District {4 -8 c4felling units per located on th i "south ��: side o Base Line Road, we ofo Archibald AveSe APf4: 2E1-- t�o� -l8, 19, ltsstciat+ed the prodect is `free Renval Pee +`t Relatlad Files: Development Agreewt k,70� General Peary / Amendwnt 87 -04G, arid Development Distr�i�:t Amen faent 87-05 .ft i I, PR03ECT AND SITE DESrR-:° tA.' A. Action Requested: Approval of the "Site Plan, 'Conceptual ITEM ft ra ng an, anceptual Laodscape Plan, building elevations, Ma Removal Permit and issuance of ,a Negative Declaration. s. 0 ,� p 8. Pro .eat Densi' ''35.05 dwelling units er acre. '. C. Surrounding Land'use -:and Zonin ..A er - opp ng Center-Comercial , South - Si le family residential,, LoW Residential[ (2-4 dwelling units ller acr--): -' East. — Shopping centor and vacant; Neighboftod Comercial and Low-ftdfiim Residential (4=6 dwelling units per Acre). blest - Single family residential; low Resideptial -(2 -4 dwelling units per acre).. _ D. _GeneralP74r, .etions: -ft-mte"' -G "medlm`Residential t4 -8 dwelling units per, North - Neighbatood Copmercial. o South - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre). v East - tWjhbo ood Commercial and Low4%diuia Residential- (4 -8 dwelling units per acre). Nest - Low Res.dentiel (2 -4 duelling units per acre )b ��: ITEM ft ptANl M C%141S�109 STAFF WORT Rt: DR 87.33 ST END March 23,,1 -4—w,- PaA* 2 1 (x; E. Sitar Charccteristics: The site currently slopes from nor6 to , souzn,At rout percentk -' There is are existing sintle '_,. „ 4'awtilY residence and, sevarai �tture trees �urrenwl; , ar sica % 11� F. Parking Calculate Number of �r of f Us parking spaces spaces R, prom ft- i o. f Use J ti enio^;t'partwtents Q,'d�U:tti Iii : 27{3 ,, J 'T, ltMYSFSt 'd I A. General. llis applicant, -is prophsing to develop, a $�,jfaiV $Tm- cWre containing 170 ap ants for the esciusive mat of `. ! senior citi ens. The one an-j- bad (Inns range in si%v from 495 s4U&re feet. to 775 swat =apt fee ' in area. The uniix #N oriented arNnd a -mmtMl la�isdaw ; Jo►�t�i'�ar� inrltici4 such amenities as �a pool, Spa, °pui�.f E ; bttr We areas c �� shuffle boy;d court,, an open lawn area. eh* parking and drive aisles are pf widod arround the periwretar of Mite sfta>In order to apt back the building, roar *" iasent�;roper'I B. Design Review Coar"xttee' The tksf4p Review Cmittaie iFa*rick, oTis o ""n revl"ft" the proposal IttoNx S. 1987' and ekpressed concern about srveral amts of the project The Comi'ttee felt that the fo0WIng areas should, a remiewed by the full planning Comnrissiv, J I, With the �elop�tent of a wr.Pl* 440ily P�ject ilie trelopn Aods requires that,4i'ilate open space be arovidad, Code ;It, "tea that 160 squaM feet of <; private o,:'tn space be p`~avided on the ground floor and 100 ssluar4 `feet -se provided. on the second and, Mrd. stories. Wff1 'the dtvirl'OPMent as p� os the appliomt is pr oosing S3 scfjara faet� cf� private ;open space for the oot bedrootx units and sx am feet ;)f,.., private open npa_ for j�4r two bedroom uni . ', hlje the t+ --sal does fire.; Met �4e Devtllop"nt Code re 'ircloftt, it Js consistent with & de+relopsAnt of sia"r.'iao senipr a �ar�t proJQ^s, lKOweYer, the Coraweittee alt that �� at+ open space -should be�ncreased ,U t the C `W e4, it nts. The Cowmitt� f±a7t that ti, open space ' +"ias nee'essary due? tp the sWall`' confines bf the x units. ,, C PLANNING {;tU! USiON STAFF REPORT RE: 09 . -s "z - WEST END March 23, Page 3 - -- 2. The driveway should be broken up to "el'iminsti-,the walleyw appearance. The Qpm tt" was undecided as W the method Of, achievir4 this objective. One option Proposed was introducing a curvilinear drive aisle. The other Option Nei incorporating a iandsca" pattern to mitigate the impact. In addQ,Uon, to the above mastion�a comert 3, the Ca-sign Review CCMiVzce racomaendea the followip.'g conditions be sttic;ied with approval of the pro3act: I. Extensive 1sHsc4ping should `'ce provided arond the perimeter, of the site. 2. The median in the driveway Should be retained and landscaped with caterir'ls satisfactory to ,4e Foothill Fim District. >f 3. 11; 0701 -02 0 3'- 23-88 PG Agenda 0 3 of 6 r� PLRk! rip COWISSION STAFF REPORT , RE: DR 87-33 - HEST Etei March 23, 1988 Page 4 are' located within . -a fill slope area fcessary to meet the _ existing grade along Sase Line Road. ihe'preservaticn of these`' trees would require exten -Ove retaining walls (up t 4 feet in height) acr-)ss a majority of the property+ frontage. given with the use of _retaining _walls, then is 'aye guarantee that 'the trees will be able to tolerate the grading cunstruCtion -.due to the.: flaunt of Birth movement and trenching that would be necessary within this area. In addition, an arborist report has been provided by the appliciiW which indicates that three trees are wortfi�k, of preservation (see Exhibit "F -R1 "). One these-trees is ioCated a+; the deepest par *ion of the fill slope and the other two, trees are located: within the future drive aisles. Based on this inforfttion, staff recommends that the trees be removed and replaced in accordance With tW Tree Preservation Ordinance. E. Environmental Assessment: The applicant has completed+ Part I of" - MI'i'a'1 °' Staff has coWleted. Fart II and determined that the proposed development will not have any significant adverse enviromental Impacts. If' the Planning Commission concurs,: issuance of i Negative would be appropriate. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: , In cyder for tl`re Plareainj to ' approve' veed c—poien Review 87-33, faces to suppok' f,:,tj +wing findings must be made. 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the apreral plan; and. - 2. That the propped use is in ACCOld with the objectives of the Development Code and purposes of the district in which the site is located, and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of th applicable provisions of:,the Development Code; and 4. That &_e proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or Improvements in the vicinity, IV.. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been in The Bai_ly��Ree�or_t newspapf') I as a pu Baring, the has site been p �- w�tTr a large notifiCatt0 )(sign, and notices were sent to rill _property owners i within 304 feetof the project. r 14 PLWOR tOMISSION STAFF REPORT March 23, 1888 a page 5 6 �. REttTMM4�ii t: Staff recaaea{ends that th , plataning 4mmission J can CW ps-ne "hearings to cont T, aft l , ents of the project and provide 'itfiftcticet to staff toil those i�suws unresbl� red b ytne sign '. Ref ri f, alter rectiving� ail' input thj �' Planning Omission suppor4 'e r0ate¢ General Plan �Wndweii, � esrelopment Distric,'" and eel pe �t re t t and can facts to roOpPort �, °� retired fMon'ggg Ap rovai of Development p ec�ierr 87 -3s and liens RewervaT Pk it 8744) and issuance of a 4gatiee DOCUr400n WWtd be a Ppr c►priata, ' i Resp l.Y sa ed, rid 8u.:: t: s p Attachaaents Exhibit "A"it. LO;tat3titt�pap £xniYt ARM - Site P�tTf r n RxhiWt T - 0000eptual P,radtrtg Plan t f exhibit "33* » cowep "al iandsrape P$in Exhibit dV „ Qui droll Elevations Exhibit "P4 . Arbo ri it€r Tree gwwal plan t Resolutioh cf'Approval ;i Co .Itiona' C} t( r r is ROAD i a a • • 4 111 44 ♦ ��:: ', e ; Y F CITY ()f RANCHO ITEM, Y � • 4e ����. f..st �y� {• �1�{. y�.(�� .. :}` a 4 {, S 3 ! � �i ��e Tc lw�r .Y.t .ti �� l �_,� �: a �, 3 �) tl j � ....� t! �� �r 77 V- S,�f ors ` l ' f�f �eXi�rsv6 �b i� v 1 4�cL`At/NCi�r +7�'i i �iFR G` //7�Y' ' 71 7418 ARCH AVEN � � it/ A «A UIT !i �. X- se�Ts�ar 4"� AeMAIAI Ale afX /�T�.V6 '�C �l `yA� >t�3� ,eP.*�r�►d'��r ewr.* seer /vv i sewza- im MY OF j dA Ae RANCHO CUCAMONGA WGG DIMON Li:: 4 '-�: � �- -�ra�c7t3Eeilsrt�`• -r �� . KP7YS7iRWALt CITY OF RANCHO CUcANto.NuA RAS`LfLIRE R086 T�^'�.WAL 1AVWQ �/ -'� KANOICAI ACClii IESMR i -, ..A c • � • s � iNiY 6fC! - y • � �j.` c _ � �R7rClT 1996 WjiR714„riVA" .f 4 '-�: � �- -�ra�c7t3Eeilsrt�`• -r �� . KP7YS7iRWALt CITY OF RANCHO CUcANto.NuA �iI%1�i11t • i. . .m�(�{il(� ' ' ' "' •ItNtiti9i►Itfi kill t _ r �pr w► CIS Of #tNiCFIf? CtDiCAl�o01A 4 RAl cgo CIIC,}'lMGNCal " C2S*�I1►CJRNIA DSERVATiom AND RESREERMTOWS Pm TRRES YACA �z^'..._A_.g. t I/ ` SENIOR HOUSING i mm MEDICAL BUILDING: �C\ CORNER OP SUELM AND ARCH ISALD RANCHO CUCA" OW-A, CALIFORNIA J� PREPAR13D BY • i SAMr3RL L. RNAPP, A: "S,C,.A« �tdlAkP PlS:'OCIATES 4•✓ . f4. I. �IYflf'd uiiF 7'gKjg,�$. fullfprtul 7141144 .'nti Y` ,� ; •, RM Ci" 90% SM • RIY$t$iclo, C81t %,Dr6 a $2815 Res Observations and recommendations of existing tree. fo V pres- ervaton'withn proposed Senipr H+ausing and Medical Building in Rancho Cucamonga, California. As per my directive, Y inspected the trees within proposed do7elop- I a merit on November 117,-.,,-_1987 located near 36 uthwa t c -arnev of . chibald and Baseline in Rancho Cucamonga. The trees, shrubs and foundati.on planting are part of three (3) plus residents of farm type establish- meats. There is a diverse palette of approximately Ainty, -two-- 021 trees growing under: variedcombinaticns of cultural care i.e., irrigation, p=ing, fer,tilzzatloa. The entire site will be broken down for identification purposes between Baseline with twenty -eight (28) trees and' Archibald site with slxty -lour (54) trees. The cri+eris for prescrvation of trees involves a mutli -step process . of identifying the trur coed tidn, growth rates, structure, pres- ence of insects and disease, crown development and most import- ant, the life expectenancy. More i.ndepth .this would take into coa- sideration the foliage, color, density, and 'size, with the new growth consideration must be given to the appearance of buds i.e., Color, size, and shape. The trunk concerns are the cavities, cal- lousing, extent of wood decay, and mechanical injuries. An °� + sPect."On of the root System would check for color, location, - root flare. „ All i Trees that are suitable foi ! preserving are numbered on enclosed tr6e location map', plus general data,�elating to the pres6tvation Trees that are not suitable c- °�Preser�,irg are based oza,, such itea as electrical;resijtanc� checking the annual growth rate, presence Ii of decay, structu weak* @ "r insects and disease, survival con- !pp didtions and life expectancy. l Q The trees are e�tinf in a soil (roots) and zanopy (leaves) an- I vironmert, they hake established`over the past ten (ilo) to forty (40) pluU years of growth, develop nt and limb structure. Pre- cautions must be exercised to pn�ti�r_:: s'iPd produbtzori or con- tinual growth rpocess. Disreptian of the- ,physical ratio or soil , and canopy relationships will result in increased costs,<,jability and plant mortality. Trees must be preservp_V within a natural or undsturbed'environments. DATA INFORMATT$N rf D.B.H.: Diame�er at Bz ezt height. Thia trees diameter Measured at fsaa p oi nt . sve feet (4.51) .; aboa;e Trade, E•R.e A Cldctrical resistance (kil.chlnCf measurement inoicating relative tree health. Trees w,Lth a lower E.R.' groat fagte and have more vigor than those with a higher: B.R. _ B.A.: The recommended distance (radius) from basal area,"af any soil environment. This is a miniza,t distance, l) �' y within this distance; woul.c See location maps a o : Se e Vkesezvation requirements 1j Af `� r require additional site inspection, for preservation concerns Ggneral commeAts f£c.!a visual inspec ion of trees. Structure in canopy, branch attachment and tip �;,'Nngation. T% trees are re.� locatable it will be noted. ARCHIBAX,I3 SITE (1) tl nnamoman camphora, (Campher tree) D.B.H. -37 ", E.R. -6'4 B.A. -12" tine of the largest trees on-the property, it w ll need special care during demolition and construction activity. Also will require spec al testing during pruNing opera- tions for,structural. weakness. (2) Eriobotrya_paponica, (Loquat) r. Goad overall form and shape and is relocatable. (3) -'pies (Fir) supp. � Tree is it aery good condition, not a` commonly grown plep'; (4) Chamaecypari s Sapp. i Cet€ar) A.B.H. -12, One of the few Cedars doing well in this locality. (5) Chamaecyparis Supp.,. (Cedar) D.B:H. -15, E.R.- 7,S.A. -8 Very good overall. condition. (6) AbiP2r (Fir) supp,: D.H.H. -8: E.R. -9, B.A.. -6 Tree is in very good co dition, not a commonly growat plant, - (7) Pinns halepensis (Aleppo pine) D.A.H. -15, E.R. -7, B.A. -12 Very strong and durable pine species with lifespans near two hundred (200) years. (8) Pinns halepensis, (Aleppo pine) E.R.-6, B.A. -12 Very strong and durable pine species with lifgspans near two hundred (200) years.' (9) Olea Europaea, (olive) (50 Multistems,.i.-llr Very handsome tree with natural gores structure and fozm... Relocatable > a- (i0) Finns laalcpensis, (Aleppo pine) .. D.B.H.-),j,. E.R. -7, Very Strang and durable pima'species with lifespans ,tear two hundred ( 200) y rs S. (11) pinns halepsnsis, (Aleppo -pipe) D.B.H.-13.50 E.R.-5 B.i�jri2 One of the most healthy Aleppo- pinas -.- v (12) - P „.S3Sts..�.���ix�`.r_�,-�+8n8, :311�=r (to�?:k"y pine) J Very healthy specimen that is,envirarsmentalyn,rutted. (13) pinns haleoenais, (Aleppo pine) a D.B.H. -4f E.R. -'7r B.A. °1a o �l Very strong and durable pine rpeeies with lifespans near two hundred Pool y firs. ;- (14) Fortune 14 marLga itz, Mumquat t J.R. -2, , 3.A. -S Multi- SteA, - - - Very' Aice specimen, good patio troy. Relocatabla (i5) Fraxinum yelutina 'Modesto' D.B.H. -llr f;.FB,• -�+ar B.A. -8 Good specimOsA very good full COlQtp `some insects "and disease= concerns. ils) tri0b2tra caponicar (Loquat) * y D.B.H.-10# E.R. ?> I.A. -8 Good overall form and shape Relocatable (17) Cupressocynaris supp.,, (c$press) B.A.T -8 Environmenta;ly suited evergreen. " (18) Liguidamberk sweetgut �. D.B.H. -5, E..R. -5r $.A. -6 Well adapted decidious treed (19) rraxinus velutina, '`Modesto' I D.B.-H,-13, I S.A. -S Good specimen, vary good full color, sCg1e in acts.and dis<-,ase concerns. - (20) Olea Europaea, (Olive) f (4 RW,ti -stem, E.R. -10, B.A. -8 Very handsome t: ee taint natu ral good atru,cture z.nd form. Relocatabl E (21) Acer sacchurinum, (siltez m4ple) E.R. -7, B.A. -12 Fast growth, but does suat Wive %a -bong lifespan. (22) La indica, (crape myrtle) Three t3) 2 "00x size trees In planter would relocate easily. 6 MOLINE SI� �. t1) LUegidamb2r, (sw tgum) 2 � .. Di B.H. E.R. -6 :71.80 BB.A.-12 Tree rxdeds plenty of sun AAd room tcs ac#aieve maxiinum size and beauty. � (2) ��'lmus�xO' .rVif61(';a, (Chinese Evergreeb Elm) D.sH. -s, E.R 'gc4d Overall a. species (3) Piatarus vacemosa, (California Sycamore) Ca:lifornia,,native, good overall tree. CONCLUSION ;1 This represents a preliminary report of trees g'table for preser- vation. Actual ident#ication of the ir;igationQtype and s6hedules, \ soil fertility, precoz�ict� testst amount � e of at, ganic mid~- ' .,and e terial, fertilization$ so.i,v coraditioniag raqui ensents 'y peci fic tree re- pruning, replacement, and relocation spec3ficatan�zsv��ulc1 t quire additional site inspectio s to ensure accurate'kepresentation ` 'phis ' Any questions regarding report are welcomed and + t(t p you: ln..erkt, is appreciated. (� r i1 J y Samuel L. Knapp, �._ Consulting Arborist X6 pp Associates w <41 i��� n 1 .. 17 W„y{ 0 t i PREE> .RVATIQN REb- ,jiREMEN'IS POR MATURE fiEkEES 1, Corrective pruning to Arboricultural standard for tree preservation in irban development. (Ceetifieci 4rhorist preferredi.. 1i 2. Establishment of undisturbed soil zone °around'trea- bases,inet,at a 12:1 ratio of soi3 suffice width to ,potential *.rvak diametCr, 3. Clearing of dgr.rp vegatatiot and retenV on of all natural lea£ litter beneat-h canopies, 'inotalL tion of wood chip u7-ilch on , ;i needed basis. 4. Where. soil ha' '--el, u�-,2acted or :ctherw se distur- bed in the- ;:zaot. zone area (particularly `cinder oanraaies ) feb !i ;t .4htiosi, aeration and watering via soil iiijeota on Of 4 1.1 'acresible soil in the root zone. S. Installation of -'drip hype irrigation systems with capacity for period-,4;: deep watering, during and after developme Water eV' ry 70 day period of _ insuff ,ci.en,!: rainfall. 6. Installation of char, link fencing to protect trees during development of the tree area. Chain link fence should ext�," to dkip' line or well beyond on spCCi fi.c reel: i. Examination and documentation of each tree, with` v specific maiat,onance/preservation requarenenta. S. Transmittal of recommendat-ons and specifications for continuing tree'UaintenanGe to parties or itdiv iduals- responsible for tLee and landscape management oil, CdMPletiol of -a-,ea development. y< A, RESOLUT109 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLMNINB cOMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW W. 87-31, THE DEVELOPMENT OF 370 sENIpR APARTMENTS ON 4M ACRES OF LANG IN Tai LOW- MlE61tM- RESIOENTIAC, DISTRICT (4-8 . DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) - LOCATED ON THE som SIDE OF l3w�SE LINE ROAD, EAST OF A2CHISALD AV EWE - Apx:, :206 - 031 -18. Al 1!;A A. Recital's. Ci} West End Investments has Med'aa; applicailnn for the apprf;ra, Of 00velopeent i Revia`w Mo. 8733 at described in the title If this I' Resolution. Hereinafte+ iii' this Resolution, the subject Development Review wequest is referret,,to as �tse application". (il) 01 the 23rd of lamb,,,, #Woo -,the Planning comaia`sion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga;eondutted a meeting on the applica1�;an and :concluded said meeting 01 that dal. Al "I legAT prerequisites to the adoption of this aesolution. ��'r. cJrFitrred. �� , it B. Resolution. 'P a. THEREFORE, it is herehr found, 0termined and; resolved "by the Planning Cs ission of i,ho City of Rancho Cuemn, ga. as follows; 1. " This Cmession hereby a: #.hat all of tl;e facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A_. of t�iis _Resolut3on axe trus ,and correct. 2. Basal" upon slibstantI6 ;►�idence presented ,to this Com�isxfian during the above - referenced meetiq oii11` rch 23, 1988,,rincluding written and oral staff reports,.this Commission,heA1, specific > f finds as follows.- (a) The Applieattion applies to property located on-the south side of Base Line Rid* west of Archibald Avenue with a street frontage of 323 =, feet and lot depth of 643 feet and is presently improved with a single family residence; and (lri The property to the north is design ted for comooi�tl uses and is develbi4d with a shopping, center._ The property to the south and west are desigaated for residential uses and ant. developed with single family 1 residences. The .property to the east is- designated .fer Commercial, "and residential uses. The corm?rcial piece is developed with a shopping center ) and the residential piece is developed with single family 'residences and I � , I PLANT 1W1 C41ISS1{M RESDLUTION NO. c, AE 'DR 87-3,�„- WEST END MEST March 2% 19th Pago 2 :\ - ` (C) ��e applicant has submt ted a,?�Aeral Plan Amendmaht an t Development District Amendment to bangs thg,land` use designations fray LOv- tdiesidentia to lifiedertial ; nd .a Senior Housing Overi�4y Distf,r o With the appror -A�l Ot -t#,k, G644 *1 PlAA and Develop t District Amendw�nts, the pro; *1M wil be care tent ,with tiie General Ilan and meet the intent and requir :its of 46 iyev 1; nt tode. 3. Used upon the substantial evidence piesented to this Comission du�iog the above-referenced, meetinpj and upon the specific findings of fa;:ts set "forte`s in paragraph X and 2 above, this Ctmaissivn herebj finds and concludes as folIiow: 4% That the proposed project is consistent, with the oWectivii of the General Plant and M That the proposed use is In, accord with the ppObbjective of the Development :ode and the lurpot 4;�andthe district in *Hch, the site is (d) That the prqwsed use Is in coepliance with each , of -'the applicatile provisions a't the Development Cade; astd < (d) That the proposod use, together with the canditi'609 applicable- thereted, will,, not, be 1 detrimeryta3l to 'the public ftealth safety`j, o , } WfareP or materially injurious to properties -or improvements in the vicinity. 4. This,Coeeission hereby finds and certifies that th,� peojeot hay f been reviewed-40 '"ansidered in compliance with the California Etvironateotal Quality Act of �1974 and, further, this Com*iss3fa herttby is5ueg it IA*ative �= Declaration. S. ased u�In, the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 Md 3 a vo, this,, ission hereby approves the application sub ect to each and er y condition set forth below and in thC1,4tttached Standard Condtticns a',: Cheri hareto and 4ncorpora�ted herein by this r�er -ice. FNki'i in Division,. 5 u jti f f1 andsconpa+vtsig. ids skirl itrncsrskn„d_- i;; he final ape p•aq,. which are subject ti review and approval by the City planner,, {pr #or to the issuance of building parents f ll ai Extensive'tiJ '#andsca in shall be D provided around" the �( peri✓eteter Pf the 5 to. < l' l b) Thy ~ iriv �ay median shall- be planted with materials U slatisfactor to the Foothill Fire District. cl 'She driven cohtiiction`at the southeast corner of the site ;/ shall be turf block for urgency access only. l>> ,'—rf; PCANN114 COWISSI€ N RESO liTION'Ro. Q, RE- DR 137-33.- WEST Eta JgWsT. } ,. March 23, 1988 �\ Page 3 i U1 d)i .ihe trees to be removed shall be replaced vith the 'largest V- ?specie size available. t (2) Trellis s0yctures shall be proYided° over he trash ` epclo. res. The plans shall bo' reviewed and approved by the City Fanner prior to the issuance,of building permits. , (3) A decorative block wall shall be required around the perimeter of the ,;site, excluding the southern portion of the east Windary. U6 wall shall be installed U avoid * double wall situations. J Ae plans shall be reviewed and approved by., the City Planner prior to the issuance of gra.�ing` permits. k(4) Approval of the project is contingent up�t approval of general Plan Asenc nt 874WG* Development D4st:K . l na�ent -05 and Developrent Agrea mt, 87-U. (5) The rlmovaT4�kj the 28 mature trees shall �1 with the 1 .�ge3t nursery grown $ req�airo replaceaent; trees ava�ilabl#, as determined 6y thi City Planner. The applicant shall submit a plan and list, Of the tree species, height and tank circueforeaice as measured twenty -foor inches Prow ground level, for the exi6,t #ng trees. �d� z� 1 . (6) A final . acoustical analYsis shall be sb itied � address potential impacts from Base Line road for interior ar,d C� Plqr r noise levels. ,Thai report shall be reviewed and apbr iVed by tKi City'Planner priori to the 'issuance of building permits; Englaeerirg Dfvisinn: ` (1) Storer drain fac1lities and private drainage easements ,,hail be obtained through the property to the east try drain the project site to Archibald Avenue, UY An.,emergiuy access easement acres; th"roperty to "the exist to insure av#trgency ingress., and egress to `Archibald Avenue and the c0ns�r2�416ir f a r+ untable curb shall be obtained prior to iss��i[uie of uiiring a� permit. (3) in-lieu fee as contribution to the Future underground ing',Of rwma the existing overhead utilities (teleconi�cation 8nd electrical) or -, the opposite side of Base line: Road shall be ald to '•:he City prior to the issuance of building pera�its. The fie shad be ant -half the City adopted unit amour_b- times the lengti,� of the project f3bontage, (4) 1,�,ai'nage from thy! site shall be outletted onto Archibald Avenge iA shah a manner- to not cause _4amage to the property to the south as approved by the City Engineer. " The outlet facility could consist of a parkway drain or pipe End ,catch bas System ou*lettin south of - the existirg driveway adjacent to �,ie south prop; rty line and the rolling of said driveway if permission can ir��--„'btained from the property owner. PLAhiUM CGWISSION RESOLUTION Mc Rtr., OR 87.+33 WEST END illtYE = � - March 23, 1988 Page �a 1 (5) For the Base Line Road dr#vaway, sightrt ; s x�, � ba'glotted on the, l4ndscopt plans. to` .°sure adeq s fo,�� unobstructed, stopping sight distance as approved by the City Engineer. 5.;The ftputy Secretary to this Comissaion shalt certify to the adoption ofl y ' hjs Resolufri"a APPROVED AND l4DtrPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF idARCti, 1988 � PLARAING C"ISSION OF CITY OE WHO CtiGAi►tMA, BY:, arry T. ti , it ratan �I ATTEST: a 1, Brad, Ater, Deputy retary of the ` lrnnia cows CA of e pity of Rancho Cuc="ga, do hereby certify that thle fora�going Res f:ution was d4ly and`, amL regularly introduced, Passed, asst adopted by, the Plamft Co�issior� of the City of Rancho Cuca -Inga, at a regular tI of the Plarnning Cowitsion held on the 23rd day rch, '1 , by the foltOng vaate -tar -wit: AYES: I tISSIONERS: ROES: J/ �TCHMISSINERa: ABSENT: COWISSIONERS: i �J _K . .ry I. PW C Jj* sitz .. -s "^ y yy W Y ;y WI x ` a x� 0 MIST ll "Ji ur ,.Wz ;. r r g' m u. _y - c y bI Be A i V jaw 22 f, f f i Original S... %all !;N,141 i+ 4W ' !111 figs IS p --op 1 r S ate.. Ing "icy= l.3��� I Ia ��`�� N� Fill A "i }n 3 6 lly l 1 3 y ,I MMM . `iii ..� •G qi O_37 i x iism rg sang In zi-tv 32 5a "N 11 list 12. Rii iv; 1 11 za who °`: ~. o + v� -Z ii`1)$'�g '^ . ,c ; 2i `off F i s �% r`a R w$ K sa $ IL _. G 1 2 T al�� INIL A ir Z. R Jy A »aR`.Yj^•6 mow`' n 'Eat ��C*.Yt a N U 'tom• ism ? Ya�tY.aR+l.I,rgY�gK�i Y �•P� �]C� 7u *{� ^�QN � 4�'�� VI 7�iT'�i� at�`•�e �+� �+� 1�1 flak fig �y�y N �yr(�M R, ti kit Nt� a«n ;!Jul ��'+.►��..q,.� `1.. 1S� ��Y±±N� � ri�b` �R �� ��1e e�a •�"�1'Y Ai 1wy{'� NY•a�n'N iCN rs'u iM� ��� KN �t — K R: Y1�1�. f� ����.W a sit o� r rg. 5 . .R i my g-° aK i h q h g<�" ; ; a g ti t d M 4 V13 ` � . *yy Y P �. aC �:Mw M.3 r N `� �M•,tvt`� µy yyy L iQQj i�r N aOU �/}. y u 49 YM� y ��CG ygyTx @ r 6x' M VO t 'AU 41 11 iow t+iaN su rv` n�.ca +ga 44k �j # e • % 1, m t M 4 V13 ` � . *yy Y P �. aC �:Mw M.3 r N `� �M•,tvt`� µy yyy L iQQj i�r N aOU �/}. y u 49 YM� y ��CG ygyTx @ r 6x' M VO t 'AU 41 11 iow t+iaN su rv` n�.ca +ga 44k �j # e • % 1, m t m t ell I-A oil yfib. ® lit I x w N « Aw ISE SPIN] lit Ile #; " s ... 0 4 1 : $3111 ,* r� Xr igaq .I «i .gl... y " ..1`�' W ay: tai 8'ii - u�"i�J tom. e p^OVV� : i�lw 3 .J� ^1��M �lJ Avg VQi! .22 �Q = N9 ;-- � Sr yy1i �^0 4 q V•e. �. W � A TZ W $ �y4Y !! a yM IIi pW !y i YAM• Oy'Y� Y �1O 1�pyZ rN� o�EY 4YY in xft I. -Y Y #L I+NG VaF M T Sis /.. » Ki3 L1 YMw 1LLiy f:.0 iYFia �1r Y'l M � v o� Mry. r V F g ell I-A oil yfib. ® lit I x w N « Aw ISE SPIN] lit Ile #; " s ... 0 4 1 : $3111 ,* r� Xr igaq .I «i .gl... y " ..1`�' W ay: tai 8'ii - u�"i�J tom. e p^OVV� : i�lw 3 .J� ^1��M �lJ Avg VQi! .22 �Q = N9 ;-- � Sr yy1i �^0 4 q V•e. �. W � A TZ W $ �y4Y !! a yM IIi pW !y i YAM• Oy'Y� Y �1O 1�pyZ rN� o�EY 4YY in xft I. -Y Y #L I+NG VaF M T Sis /.. » Ki3 L1 YMw 1LLiy f:.0 iYFia �1r Y'l M � v 1 O O TL s�y T4 M all �I .I AX ft silt - -1 11a; i w K A Y c sill ' slit. r IS' « I l ax r i G 4 Y +i t` ,z 2%0 La I X+ a pj 1 i-Hall 3� C� P a � r�SS�t jai gs O WN Y N WY� G .7G 4 T4 M all �I .I AX ft silt - -1 11a; i w K A Y c sill ' slit. r IS' « I l ax r i G 4 Y +i t` ,z la Ar6R, pj 1 i-Hall 3� C� P a � i T4 M all �I .I AX ft silt - -1 11a; i w K A Y c sill ' slit. r IS' « I l ax r i G 4 Y +i t` a I 0 w Aga! TZ M 11A N a TL M 3 S IS Ire N y y,a P oif w Iii �`9 Q5 Be s A Y} Q Q u r e8 y N 4 4 cc ti r N W Y in ^K L W �Nr tiW e ZVI N Y l All s OR U! ', 0 R 1l7t1~~y.,�URi.`.. sit Ile all «» sp^ N nu, �€ a R «: ox w44 M ++ wt E yyr •Y y'Y yYXyXi ee� Y -V.y �I etlW+.. Tjv VgfsL AI �sq�i SE i 1 Ste' .;�`dy 1.T g :i ,g e s w1f `��i' wn M N � x iY� N NbL• Kit �a �. � �O b.4 N�1+�.. �W+ p� M� sh+ yK g '� lfi a `q ® ♦ y y CO O� HE `.. '^O / v�� s' �f. . "a' 1195 . Y W` 4 �y 1pM. �{ a+.�. $M� M n Y i!Y '0.7Y ±`dpi O ax'ti qy .pMy N M { k U Nat At, :� CrrY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ca IS DATE March 25, 1980. � > W77 Lt ; TO: Chaim"n and tKq ttrs Of the Plamfngn Com ssiota FROM: Brad Buller, City.,Planner 9Y; Cynthia Ki6sers Assistant Planner SUBJECT: EPAgIROHFSWX fia"MgM#IT AW CONDITIONX USE PERMIT 88-06 ¢ w g regues£" esi wish a carrp� store. 16 4 ash" space "of 1,650 square feet tf tftjo, an existing ueulti- tfnant Industrial center I a Cif 4ml Industrial District (Subarea 41 located it §156 ) ribald AsenUe a APN: 209-29111 -44. I. PRIOJECr XS ,SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action. Riquastedg ` Approvsq of a non- cofAtruction conditional R use pens �stdblish- a carpet store within :gin existing 'industrial center located. at 9155 Archibald Avenue Mite C3. G B. Surreoundfng land Use and Zonings - - Industrial Cen er, General Industrial � South - Industrial Center, Gpheral Industrial East Vacant, General Industrial West Single leanly Ret'i4antlal; Ltw density Residentjjai .(2 -'4 dwelling unity per acre) C. General Plan Ees# ationst lrblic Site f gnera n ustrial North - Gencral Industrial' _ South - General Industrial East - Gefloral Industrial T V West _ Lov Dsnsit, Residential (2 -4 dwe,iing uAits per acre) D. Site Chiricter i §tics° The proposed use ii <,Iocated within an ex is gag n us"l;`Ir ai'�� enter which Includes a varfety of uses lsee parking calculatfonsi. . The IM4,;trial Specific Plan {SuWetV 4) allows Jji1.e4ng and light equipwt supplies and safes, subject to of at Conditional Use Pemit by s� the Planning_ Comiss,,on. .. ;, PI1l1iN;N6 C'OMMION STAF , REPORT CONNTTONA€. USE PERMIT $W w T44S tire.; 0, 2958 Pay6 F. Parkieod Calculations; � ,={ bOr Of HuMber of TYR° Square Pawing Spacos Spaces Ratia� vuii, Prover. _ KIM Leone's Nest. 2,660 1/100 17 Los Angeles Tims, 2,680 2/250 Abletranics 3,360 . 1 /AFRO $ g Corporate travel 2,650 Q2551 OCC Caine 1,680 1./25ig: Dean" Young 1' 690 x/960 � Print *steit 2,650 1/400 4 9 CarpeVstore p{ Eproosedy 21650 1/950 \ji $ g. Total 6S Awns: A. C4nera7y The Va Me t stow. Wll p 0- oorate !em l 111' /' to Wray Saturday see Exhibit 8. Issues; The primary issues re,ate(r`� locating this type of use W ,fn an industrial center setting, are camaatibtlity with sUrrOundi+lg businesses 4nd parking availability.. Eased upon the currant occu ncy within the 'Centera Compatibility conflicts are..nat e "ected.-� .Tt10 ad�oi vacant. nin$ suits Is presently = "" Based upon the prroposed square footage of 1,650, tho carpot S"re will regtire eight parking spaces U space Per 260 square €eet). The cOrrent on -site parking of nice spaces for this unit would Uerefore be adequate to accomodato the use. The Foothill Fire Proteetion District has revi" A this applicQUOt' and has requts4ed: that if the building` is to be sproklcred, that sprinkler plans bhp fitted the Fire District to installation ,prior flee Exhibit IV) C. Environmental �►ss+es nt° Upon review of Part I of the Initial ,► r `an oar r n o art II of the Enviraw;ontal Checkl 1st, staff has found no significant imPACts related to a carpe store locating within this industrial Center, 111. ACTS FOR P INGS ' 1* That the proposed use is ,In accord with the General ` Plan, the Objective �f the 00e1004nt Code, acid the Purpose Of tho 1adustri4'k--- ific Plans Subarea 4 in which the $Ite is l tested: E►pplicanK ^ praposas Open a,,t:ar±�t stare 'i,6 an exietirg to�JdIAS ari inaliy designed . coaattxcial use. The ���eviOUa "*r was ')Wiii taafn R3�n RecreatiAn tint weds atio". Prop -med ume #.s Pir 825 mare feet of ra aillwitol 4sala aht+texea, tod' 82$ aqua `e feat , :arpet aECaraa ae " OWL requires high, "rinati�a4 cI ,,TACO and as fat,. ;e tcdustriatl type °x1 i -u, loading. drr�r. .� rya of ,,�i�ae�k% t w iT .%s IOxQ#?,.d�» to 5440 .M* l Monday thru S;ru�ra�: sy. ��v* gill-, be 4 maximum, M etmgIa�et�[ , /s, 'r `Ly'Yie° any -� QIAQ tip.. t'iQ; IOQait' -iatt is iiaF to ` our 6� �1la�avY� as dnm;. to its close , pro (n,Ity to ohs PreeVay, and ecoassibt ;i6y.:, out „ear -y-!to7fjAd wainrso rtr, cteqq'' a combinatim of comotcidl xb*WrOT and Oki Induatrlal wara� assn! zrfGh h1Fgh Inside j tl!aranceb� and a ra38- up.,lcading door, 24,01T stot`Wge of rarpot,�Qlio,` c' I I� This f ct3ity is "tU* Only One fre, warn a #k e: to find in ,the area that s+µ:t all of our parameters: of sizr` L h. 'ivo, Oati�ruoh4us* coathitentt on �it3t the regJired inside clearance and bduwtr ;sl roll ap doar. � I I r , 1. l l� PRorrp7ioN 'f P.O. sox ► , mi l: *!!4;rjCL1CA-motm Wall ' + February 25, 19!! (y } (11 } I J CYMWQ S. ktn ,,�Asib Planner o 1Citay� of Rasscho Cesest Rencho COVAAWW, CA 117110 '% Dow M4 Kinaere / o The Fds ihiii Ebse D4frict inns and �o comment cw1em n! the Above. If the building is sy'isnkl�r�d, and any' ` a ��l'�MOo n is to be- *00, sprh*lw Plans s'wt, ,submitted to this + rtmini fgr approerai prW to irttaiietW, and occupa�-y ` f Thwtk�r .- cr the qWtunity to ad*oss this itorn, Sincerely, y Vera As ArEia` Fire* Prev�sntios: specialty! VAAl'u Adak , IMCULATION -. 100, R.O.W. RAIL MRV= - . + +V,+ i°++ ����`� � r ptvawo 'd TRAILS/ROUTES 0000 pedemm" "CIO Spocial 8uetsce"/ wp.. Landuil Power kw lave nt Access cftft VI Mi ,f 400' eot)l iliSili' ter: "parceI Ross an# lot conttauratksna �. 'area shown as appraxknati�sn only yj {sF y/ C D 1 � �4�¢'�u►iiy l� gi�idMB�ii� �A9Rkt+� �+� 0 "e 1i�10 Glull� 4 A r S� }i rtf+IJit!� I.O. low sq. ft 6 -LjiLLLL4 trwt� or- r c 4, � r M f 1 U j= D'OR'Y Wb —'DIVISION EXHIBIT: SCALE—* r� ;d' %' r i 'RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCANONGA PLANNING CORCSSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Nil. W-W FOR A 90PET STORE LOCATED AT 0"�- ARCHIBALD AVENUE, SUITE C Iti THE E GENERAL INDUSYRUL WIa�RIC7 (SUBAREA 't) - APM A. Recitals. (i) Michael Tons has filed >an application for the issuance of the Conditional Use Panrlt c. 88-06 as described in the tike of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the applicatfcn ". t� :l On the 23H of Rarch, 1988, the Iaaning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed,public hearing on the application and concluded said bearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites t6 the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. j' NN, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resole f syrthe j{ Planning C"Ission of the City of Rancho Cuca a as Follows: 1. This: ` " . ComWssIcn hereby specifically f''fnds that all of the facts set forth in tbfl Recitals, Putt A, of this Resolution are true and correct. z. Based upon subetantial eviaem a presented to., this Commissir- -_ during the above- referenced public hearing on March 23, 1988, Including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this ` Cowlissioh hereby specifically finds of follows: (a) The application applies,,- too er" rop ty ,located at '��.455 Archibald Avenuo 1iite C) prAlcll. is a psuite "looted ink 'existing awlt4) tenant industrial building win 95 parking`sp ces that��s designated Genes Industrial (Subarea 4); and ibi The property, t l ` }a north r' "*bject site consists of an industrial center, the pro~ the s .(r of that site consists sf industrial building, the property to the ease- vacant, and the property to the west is single faia$ly residential; and tcl The proposed use would require a parking spaces; whereas, 9 spaces aryailable; and (d ) - The only 'adjoining suite is currently vacant; and (el The proposed use is similar to paint, glass, 'and ha,dware stores which are activities ; "typically Included in the Building and Light , s EEquiPment Supplies and Saps landi use ty0e conditiona)iy pe; Itte:# in Subarea �r PLANNING "COMISSION RESOLUTION . CONDITION& USE PERMIT 88-`-'06 - TOIL March 23, 1 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Calirission during the above - referenced public hearing and upw the specific findings of facts set forth �n paragraph, -1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: 0 (aI That the proposed uset'is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the industrial Area Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) at the ' r)pos use, together with the _ItI applid ;e thereto, will lot be detrimental to th�r public health, safety, or fi relfare, or materially injurious to properties or Improvements in the vicinity. i (c) That tie proposed- use cowl ies with each of the Ii �;.. applicable provisirns of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. ^1 4R This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the pw. ECr✓ ias been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Eft0rong , tal Act Quality , of 1970 and, further, this Cogml�sion hereby, issues a ative Declaration. S. ` Based upon the findings and, set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Comm;ssicn -t�oreb_ approves the application subject to each and every condition set >forth below and ii the attached standard Conditions attached hereto and Uicorpbrated herein by this reference. Conditions (1) Approval of this regaest shall not wait'- ,compltiance with all sections of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, and all othertity Ordinances. (2) If the operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or operations, the Conditional Use permit shall be brought beforj the Planning Commission for the consideration, and possible t, ' termination of the use. (3) Any signs proposed for the facility ~shall be designed in conformance wit.: the Sign Qrdinanct aEnd any uniform sign Program for the complex, and shall I require review and approval by t"_312nning Division ,.,`, prior to installation. PLA*NIP i COMMISSION RESOI,UTI�Ili K'( �} CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT W06 March 23, 1988 Page 3 �\ (4) The facility shall be operated in conformance with= the perfar ance standWrds `for Subarea 4; including.. but Rot limfited to, noise levels. (5) Carpet deliveries and Ack- shall use the rear roll-up door ool up c Sr The Deputy Secretary to this ComOssicn shalI certify to the adoption of this Resolution. �D o APPROVED AM ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF 1'�ARCH, IM. ) PL,+D NINE COMMISSION W THE CITY of RA1iCN0 CUCMOWA, .- BY: f� - � �� tarry . e , a ran / ATTEST: ra SO W$ WHY Wretairy I, Brad Puller, tk AY Secretary of the Manning come" "ion of the City of d Rancho Cs :a:mon+ga, do hereby certify thAt the ,foregoing ig{@ution was duly and regularly intr_ ced, p . c $ _ .o!' tad by the Planniing Cometissian of the City of Rancho�'ucarwrga, at og�far wetIN* of the Planning Commission held ert the 3Nd d�aYY11 f :arch, -,W- by the following vote -�to »wit. j AYES: CO►ISSItRS NOES; ' COl��SSIONERS. 1 AWN', . COi� SSIONERS� fj ar, c I -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA ST"F REPORT DATE: March 23, 1588 _ T4: Chairman and ?',,niters of the Planning Cowission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy F04g, Associate Pinnner� SUWECTf ENVIRONI iCAL ASS95SNFUT Awn MWITTYnNAr rice br V; ruvr M W, A5=1ALTES - lne ve Opment of an Automobile sery ce:�r crmisting of 3 buildings totaling 41,220 square feet on 4.46 acras of land in the 6en+rral Industrial district, Subarea 2, located a the northeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and Ninth Streit APR: 2.09- . 1112 -17. I. prawn AW SITE DE-�PTION: A. AC f6(1 -f ested: Approval of an auto service canter, site p an,,A eve ons and issuaarce of a Negative Declaration. S. Surrrau_n_d1_n_2�U_ hd Use and Zoni trtn: 4 unoccupied I ndus r a-bulIding; General Industrial District, Subarea 2, South - Vacant; General industrial% istrict, Subarea 2, r East 4 Ya�ant, nw warehouse bui 'tilg; General Industrial District, Subarea 2. Vest Mini - warehouse, mul f- tenant industrial park; General Industrial District, Subarea 1. C. General Plan Aesi nations:} ro ec Sire -15eneral industrial. North General Industrial. South General industrial. East - General Industrial. West - General Industrial, D. Site Characteristics; The site is vacant,',"-and vegetdtion consists Of na ve grass and weeds. E. Parking Calculations: 1, Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces �bf L11" Foot,ge Ratio a iced Provided Auto Service r7-9'220 3 plus 167 22D per Service Bay i sTE�t E PLANNING COMISSION STAFF DEPORT RE: EW. ASSESS. A OUP 8747 Harch 23. 19988 /) Pae2 g F. Applicable Regulations: The development of auto service center Ga Ire a e reviewed and approved by the Planning Tuisston. CI ANAL � } r psis: A. General.* The site is part of phase r III of isle previ6sly approve master Tart as shown in Exhibit "C ". " The previous devel er Meessa t , 58r no longer ap l wishes to pursue � �►s e � ang � phased €_ueloi.wt. The applicant, Auto Sere PkIl, IrF:,,` is proposing to develop an. automotive service center, a "ot?aa stop shop" for all types of minor,., auto repair, scruffier and tiro shops and other relateoi t7es of ,servicosil The site plan orientates Building A in a L- shape so that the asaiority of the overhead doom face interior ao at the, ume time screens building B. U.- number of overtae3d doors that fronts on 9th Street and Vineyard Avo we has.been minimized. Where they occur, jarge pockets of Jandscape ?:rea have been provided across frt* these doors i an aittw pt to screen Chem. Further, these doors will have a reduced height of eight feet instead of the 14 fogt'`'hoight. rrw p�*,�..qsej a %nation consists of contemporary style with two are of \ gra; _4Tue and gray piaster and gray brick material. The dar�ie3t tinted glass is being proposed to screen the stirvice ` P is� activity inside the buidtr�y. -'lire intent is that the ���v ice hay glass doors would be open ,.brily +Then a car is ester or Leaving. c B. Design Review Committee: The Committee Mitisa, Tolsi y. rou til) Initially reviewed this project on . Noitm ber 19, 1587, The Committee raised aesthetic concern on' Ur-1 overhead doore that face Virey',ird Avenue, the detailing of-- the elevations and landscaping. '_e Committee near ended that the applicant revise the plans t* address- their concerns. Grs December 17, 1987, the Committee provided- further directions for the applicant to revise the Site Flan and elevations its al attempt to best meet the City's applicabU codes. These directions are as folloA: 0 1. Roil -up doors for Building A that front ,nn_ vineyard Avenue should be recessiQ a minim mn of 4 feet. 2. The southeast side of .;8u$'td4Aq C is tubject to public: view where additional landscape planter area shWd be provided to this corner and across from the drive aisle for screening it. c- v a PLO"'ING CWSiSTON STAFF REPORt RE`., `INV. ASSESS. a CUP 87 -37 r: March 23, 1988 Page 3 3. Architect4ral focal pcints should be prLi idad to the north, south 3t.qi east corner, of Building A. The first roll -up door on the southeast side of Building C should be eliminated. Additional artit�tiation to tFis south elevation should be provi& -d. -' S. _ the applicant should consider "ing a different build�jg material, such as brick, bosides the p eer mater�tr3 ih the three -tone <" nor. —? 8. Reflective glass or dart: tinted glass ;,should be utilized. 7. Details of, the , substantffil revC�t and building should be providi r� for rev iew., �1 8. CaPlister signs are n pproprfate. 9. Full material sample- boards should ,ba provided for. rsview. C 10. in regards to the_ issue of cic^sure of !or the northerly iadlace,ii)piirceli the Caamittee stated t1,At it I� has to be disvussed `and resolved at tine 'Planning t� Commission tweeting. f The applicant has been working diligently with staff to revise I the- '",`'ate; *0 best meet. ,�4 C�pittee concerns as stated abdYU' -- ` On March 3, 1j88, t o Committee 1;�itiel,. Kroutil, Coleman) r,:aiewed the _- final' ` plans of this prwject and ; recommended approval with the !",,flowing conditions:." ;l 1. Dark tiWted glass should b'e�used as the sample submitted t, 9 Gray No. 14), during t[??'�theet n,� (AT6 1 2. Details of review, btMding edges, Coker edges for brick material, dAtailing of how the Jtr different materials will be transitioned into ora elanother, etc.,; shoulit) be provided for City Planner review and approval. 3. The first roll -up ,:door at the north side of West -_+4evation of Building A should; be moved southerly, while the landscape planter be moved nQrthcrly�- , 4. The Cotmhtee determined that the tower element is adequate ire providing a fecal pAinto Additional ,:landscape planter areas should be provider across frgm the southwest corner of Buildiny'C. Q, PLANNING Ct liSSbbN VIA F REPORT - � - R . ENV. ASSESS. CdP 87>37 1 � o rarch 23, 1588 Page 4. C. :'he Issue of Access Off ..Vineyard venue: The applicant is propps ng an access off vineyar d enue immediately north of the project site as shown in Exhib G "C " -, The developer, Auto Serve Mall, Inc., stated thrt ° this access is notded for _ visibility and easy ingress =and egress into site The eav�y has i 'iom oper been worki�,i ; 4 e6senger iany► the _ tortnerly adjacent property owner to obtain' reciprocal access cj�ement. According to the City's policy, access off 'arterial and secondary'streets aWlimited. The policy also requiras that; any develop*nt a;n a cgrnar parcel is, ii take access off a T?cal streati� which is the case 10 this project,. The reason (s,'to insuwa . effectiveness,. and capacity ;of, ,aeterials, and secondary streets an4; to move traffic ''along with 0*1 least y ` interruptions and fri,'ttions. Vineyard Avenue is aw °undersiied a?terial W1 is heavily traveled now. Based on the most recett City, -wi( V,4ffic study, toe l'raffic Engineer concluded 1rhat only one access off = lFineyard\; the east side) should be allowed between Plinth Street and A )w Highway, ip order to ' move traffic along a$ . are acceptable level. hie re -:use and redevelopment of 'the existingI ustrial building, north of tine project site waAld require, -the closure of Oe southerly existing drivi:*ays ark redoing the driveways �ated At the ' middle in order to meet the access policy "';issue ,as thoroeghly -discussed at the time when the Plrranii(,�UO Mission reviewed a proposed Canditiohtl Use Pewit for a trtr -kibus assembly use Crown Coach, where the Commission has stAtAd Mat only one- driveway on the east side of-'Vineyard A4enut -!M1 be allowVj. Subsequently, the ,`awn Coach project gas withdrawn, Further, the project si takes two ,faints or _ access off Ninth Street, which meets the City requireioenis and the Fire District requiry,m�eents. Therefore, the pmposed access off Vineyard Aveerje for ,,this project w"Id zppefrI Cann eSsary.` _ -With the requirement Of one access toff Via( and Avenue, the C` = developer, has suggesteo that the access coul'v� located at the t <: northern part -^ of theft adjacent property as shown in Exhibit 1, The;" &TY- Engineer has studit,,J this proposal a,nd determined that the must logical location' of a driveway for the re -use and redevelopke:at of this existing iitstrial building would be towards the middle of the site, ratheri than rat the southerly part of ct' , the site. The developer of this proje could sharethi3 ifrivewa4:; " Based on the City access policy, t'* cone ",ion of the-Adjacent nortf erly parcel and the projecir- s.te � aving two points of o access off Ninth ' Street, ` staff concl udc � that the proposed � access ;x ss y �'neyard Avenue as -shown is unnecessary. Staff l PLANNINS MISSION STAFF REPORT RE: ., ASSM.' a CUP 87 -37 ,r flirch 23, Imo' Page S { y recoasg s that the PIrMfng COMMission adhere, to the City's 1� access °,. licv b deleting the proposed driveway off Vineyard: Av g' Shown in Exhibit "DO. 1, Q D. 6viron"ntal Assessment Staff has'`twpleted Part. II of the v rOnven s;_ s and determined that the dev+vlopmenst of this prak *act would not have any StInificant iVacts on -the environment, will;; the mitigatienr measure that proposed location of `` ttye driveway W4c rift' Vineyard Ag pe is I eliminattC -'t the Planning t.omeia3ion car urs w1 these I findi�s�, issuance of :A Negetive Decli �atfon world be r. I t' M. FACTS MR FINDINGS.* `The project is consistent with the General i an ak p « e n s rial cif9o° Alan. *M* project Trill not be detrimeenta* to the public bOWA Or safet,�, or cause, nuisances or significant adverse eavirowntal impacts. In addi'tiony the proposed use, building design, and site plane together. wita�; -the , recommends conditions of" approval are 'in ewpliance ra��',Jtha Industriral Specie Plan and all other applicable provisions -af the City's standards. IV. CORRESPMENCE: This i* 'ha€ been a4vertised as a public haa^ing e a -Re-1 art neW .4per. Public hearing notices wee,* sent to al:` proper • es W iein 306 feet of the project site. In addition,, the site has been posted for public hearinga._. V. P.ECOWENDATIM Staff recaaraends that the Plawing 000S$16n —City's access policies by placing jr condition bf approval to delete tha:.proposed access off of Vineyard Avenue. If the Planning COMMI San :concurs with the findings and 'ihe R"OlutiOM with codiditions of o epproval,_ then ipproval i,off3 „ Conditional Use`hrnit 87 -37 apd issuance off; Negattive- Declarat'ion would be appropriate. Resp 1y su / erOr' Or' P an 88:NF:ko Attachments: Exhibit "AO - tw.!xation Map Exhibit pia - Site;Utilizejuh Map Exhibit C - Previkwsly;Approved Phase :i2 of the Muster Plan - �`� E,thibit "D” - Detailed Slite Plan Exhibit "E" Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "F" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "G" - Elevations Exhibit V - Perspectiv+ View G, 0 Resol4tiOn,0f Approval 4A Standard Conditions .;� � T .� s d �- i �i �� s, .� f � �E r� �� k; A: ^� �, y �tg: M i ,� .g _,. ��. .. �::_ s `✓ wr ,+ fir' i t ;f »�" q �� i �� � wow. x . <t'fa.« t ,• r �,t,i;s^- a r 13ii7F t' 1 � ). .gyp aN. � •' f f f - LE IE Mal M6 k y ; XORTK Tv OF RANCHO aM TITUR:. Milk .+ate 4 r. r y � � � ��� - Yid • �� PIK l , i '..I �.; m.. R I I TJ . i ME Jul M 'aim w � �. \i aeit s• � w V � ►1.j�+r.rp. Mf'?iRrlMlM�r C �,'C`' + «yel +a'�taMw .n,,,� • M�Aa M► "'M�Awa ww *r iM cur + �4,�,r••• 11 r lot t Is NORTH QUITY OF IAWNG DIVISION ` l ."� T—// RXHIBIT — , n ���►LT; _, .°� 4 �,� e sv., EDE, III P, tilt H9 N 1111—M fill p pi � ti s t :o t �E?1IIIf�M■i�r "� I � - l � �� � , � ;, � .� �.a .. ��� , � � I � � � � (� i �� i5$ � � � � — r I t ;, �, ,� j U `� iN!� ! ��� a �(Y ►� ', ; ,t �� 9 �� :� � y,� ,w ,+{ ,, �/ t`._ _._ '.� L fill ew r '4 Z �� Z. o �CAI � €� 12 rak te . . ............. -19 L-A a ell X64 �fii + loll x f •a ILL- 0 h C" y� A RkSOtUTIOR GP Tk k*,HO CUCN OW PLAN IFtCi COi i %SSFOiV APMOVING COWXTIEX "J: USE PEMTT,! NO, (,;8747, DESIGW REVIEtd MREM, AN MODIFICATION To PHAM, 3FI OF THE MASTER PLAN OP✓ <"- DEYEL~ _ R IL'W 86 -1,1 FOR , }� DEVELWM,ff OF M AUTO SERVICE C 'ER UONSISTING re � BUILD% S MTALIKC- OjW. sQUAr'iE FEET. 4:45 ACRES OF tAi LOCATED AT THE A,fit ORW Op 9TH St�eT AWO VIKYARD AVENE IN :;At % 4STRIAt DI. c�', l AP!! 2O3- Ol2�Ai � � A. Recitals. (I) Auto Serve Mall, ink ht� filed an app 1wition, for the i suastc a? the Condition;t Use Pprait.. #a, R. 3i As described ;n the title cf this �esoiution. Hereinafter in this Resdiuti the subjeez CordF #onai Uae Permit realest ;s,_referred 10 ar ,' "'tyre agrAFcati&�, (it) On the 23(rd of Ala�rc`h, 1910, tfie - Plannia�a Comission1.o ,the Cttja of Rancho Cucawflga �tonducted n 3y soifced put�lic'hgari±:g +gin the bpplica�ien ancr' concluded saiS hearipg -- s tea " (III) Ail legal preregsf,,ites to the adoption of_"-,h1s'1'Resolutian have occurevd. B. 4? EStr9ttc NOW, TifERtt`,u , t?G is Hereby fouctdt deteriined and` reselvea by tta _ Ptanntrg Coflt,issian of ih6, jrNty of ftncto Cuct "a as foaZJ ws: - Ia This Commission heriay s*INdsl'ty finds that all Of the fects` sett forth in the Recitals, part At of this Resdlutiow 3� trod and ,orrect, r v _ eased aipon sa..: � tf�' � €o�trtcg p �iLe � to tlols- i+, issiun during the abovesrefereft;*d pu.�va �� heal mQ on MW b, haa. including written and "Oral staff reports, tr* ,ter wilth r ' 2 Ca ,rsion herby sperifrcali,s fiords A3 2si Al i. public st.niogyr, this ,\ J (a) Thr. a'Oplicatfonr `cvaplies to property located at the northeast corner of Oth Street a" . V.�Se and Avenue with,a street frontage of 4ppro rely 8466 feet end lot Ojai ' of 3SX and feet and is presently waif proved; CbL -3t►e � *itty north of the stubj$t iite exist,i g industr *) b'Of1di g tit , Is u MCWApieJ „.rise- property` to' the south is vacant,; the prapo ,.` - i W 4 -t 14 *;` Vacan.. and with a newly �c�IeVi we ehousa building,,, t to the Est 'is ,a mini- *2r ehoUse and a rr �5� p4L'+y�r�ici(i��� «4Ut�P C�yESCIµQi ;in�,�".��tM�:l3t�tf#i 7Wp7 - .? _ _ _ age � '^ ... ) L (c) i'be proposed site plan with the deletion= of the 0111 u ; driveway ofd` Vineyard Avenue c 7 'ties' with the City accss policy and will not r ri crtilte, }rffic' ipci and .. c - id9 -The �prvposfd �ise� building s4 and sits -pl-11 together - with the rte. 6ijded conditions OF, approval are in pamlliance pit the Industrial „specific plans' ° -3d All other applicabZat er�v3sians of the City ,. standards, { 3. Based upon the sobsrantiAl ;:vide�2 pri 1*Pted' to 04s Cow WTsi i F during the above- refor*nced,,publit 4i6ring ani 'upon °the spacifi j findings of fa� --paragr}�ir a above, tfwi Coaaaisefon her by finds and ct3 set forth i f concludes. }i, follows: I' ): (a) l at' the pr6pos d use is in a ot� the General plo#b, tha obs tives of the In4ustrIA = ,., Specifir, 'rr, and tyre ptrrpoees of the distrisl.t in eohickffiz Of4 is loz icf That €her proposed lie, ' togeiher With t134 ' ' cbrditions` applicable theroto, wild not .be detrimint�l clo the public healer, sbfetyy, or Zfare, or *Urially injuriou CaS' prop rti�3 j Ank dq ,iaprervraee is ?a ifio vicinity. r y ° That the ;wopo"d use zoopl iet does cowoky �t� Y ofJ err ?,pplicable provisions of t e arafapsocie and the; �'rn,,nl Spedific _ is 4. This,.,Gbm.ss1oh ereby rinds -ad certifies tht:t been roviemd and copsider�ed in cowliance wit #.b " California Pn�rlron l Qaalty Rr;t of and, further, this tZcii`ssirir here;by astas a ttegatFare Declaration. S. Based .upon the findings pad condlusioavn° set orth in,; paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Goaaission,her"�by approves the application subject to edGh and eve condition sot forth` bell and In the attached`" Standard' Conditions attached hereto and fivorporated herein by this reference. (l Dark 'tinted -qiass shall be used OTG;4ra4y No. 14� c :fi (2) Details of reveal, taildinq eb4es, cornea edge for the bride a � ?riaZ; de l_$19 of , nc r the arc► dif nt'� motel,,, als transition -. 4 o one another etc, shall be pr lMded for,z#tty plaEstier ro igw and atproviA prior to ,issuance of building perits. °r \; RE:'--CIO? 87-37 - 14ARTEWS d9a�x) 23, 1985 PFD J`I (3) The first roll -up door at the north si4e of the *st elevation of Dui ?ding A shall be< mo�ecl southerly Whilaf the �Gapa planter shall be,,-wvid northerly. F. t41 Addlltiohal landscape planters shall be provit�ed .�rcross ft *� ate " S soythwest corner o�F ,801djing C subjeet to City planner r�evioQ ati.alapproval prior to issuance of building pemits. Ali fat" signs shall be of iaidI idual channel letters inxt?ad ��. of cannister signs. (6) Special landscape treatment shah he Qrovtded ala1g s>rh's reet and iney_re Avenue with, "Increased slumber of trees, specimen size trees and accent trp�as• _ r.- (7) Dense 'landscaping' shall be provided al+¢ng tee east property � boundary andthe north ors►�r bounds p� ty . ay. t�) Special ,; landscape treatment" with "in0eased number of Lree , accent trees $nd sptciaerr `size gees shall be provide at �l project entries 4t (S) Texture part silt for walk W#,p acrfoss frculation aides shalll be ,prcnrided tai shall - b�►, � desd�ned to ' bs` cotgatible ttie .witlrt , architectural sl�yle and ;Tall iVt integral Color for richness, � rS ub rct'"to t4ty PlanOr revielf and apps v41� A full sa *ie of thin' texture pavtent sha7'1 be, Bitted- to the -' Planning Division .tor rev#' and approval "pr°� r�`.to issuance of building �1 �erarits'� � " (PQ) k uniform hardC`ar�, aind strset furniture treatment, includi g L i trash receptacles,`- Benches$ hike racks, etc.- shall be`,ut¢' zed and designed. to be ccsapa+tible with the= at�Wtectural style. Detailed desigrs shall ba 4bmi;,,ed for Planning'Afvision review and approval prior to issua.kt, of- lbuildy pg pewits. 0 fli) The site ana11 baydevelopeO and owiptained in accordance Ijith the* approvisd sqt plan, Wci itucludes arrchitectural elavationss exterior materials ad; colarsk-` i�pdscaping end grading on file with 'the PL, I iing 91vi0on, �a tonditions the e�, in, Development Code riegulations; and Ote industrial �,Speci�4is F an. . Provisions- for the'folloiting' design 'features in the trssh enclosure to the satisfactior*'oR,the Citg Planncr: a) ArchitecUrally integrated into the" design of u �} tki. project., ri MOM bl 4ilartt,k �udestrian access ch$'i , does : not t reiOf & openfag min doors to includ!, self -. ' yOL.4i q pedestrieh_ curs, wl � r PLAXNZW2 CAWSSION RESOLUTION NO. - HAR � EMS RE: C23 819 March 8 1 ; Page c) Lame enough to accommodate two'tra,h bins. d) 'gash with counter- weighted li�(s. -bins e) Architficturally troated"3verhead shit:e. (13) Roll -up tdoor that fronts on 9th St _e ;,shall be closed between the hours of Ir and Vineyard Avenue :OD P.M. to 7 :00 A.M. (14�) 8utdoor.11'4play and sales of mirchandiseshall not be Al lnved. f. t15) Reciprac�� drivey< easement for the r �1`" drill at the ; northeaa } ly side of the project attn and along the east propperti, bouhdar shall he recorded kor to issuance p of buMeIng permit. - Engineering Divisiot, (1) Overhead Utilities: - a) Vineyard lvenue `'"Phe - existing Overhead utilities (electrical, except for the 66 KM electrical) on the proj#;s side of Vineyard Avenue shallcbe undergrounded from theirffrst pole south of 9th Street to the first pole north of,the nwetherl property line, prior to public i�provement acceptance oh',,eccupan -, whic aver occurs first. The "loner deve may request a reimburtement agrement to recover one -ha f the City adopted costa for undergrounding from future :develop*Int (redevelopment) as it occurs on the - opposite side ofl�the street.- - b) liintSV -' Stre et 11 - The existing overhead utility ttelecomkunicati0x and olectrical) an the �ro, :;t side ,of;. 9th Street shall be undergrounded from the first " paje'off -'� Alite east of',the easterly property boundary to the first 1.4le on ther +cast side -of Vineyard Avenue, prior to public ftrovement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occtlrs first. The developer asay request a reimbursem€nt agrs+eaent i j to recover one -h�if the City adopted cost for undergrounding from futuro development Jredzvexgptaent) a., it curs on the opposite side of the street. � (i)' / v A3/ is 4 140 V�rWaru avenue between 9th 5tre } j and Arrow Route which shall be a�ygned �ritir the�mfddie driv gy. on the OppO�ite side of "the street. This project may sham ,hat driveway if all other existing driv, ways are removed. 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Cowtssion -'Z'1 11 cerjIfy 'jr< theJl adoption of this usolution.= i v RE: CUP +C.�ytyxS�Ig��R�EySO.1.#�SI /�C Nil. � \� :Sib: 'CUPS' 87-4! +.I�MI- Aa'f. ; ,u 1i:. P9�t h 23, 1"S m�ra. page APPROVED AND Aa PTEV THIS 23 Pf.R*l 'S COMMISS N OF RAiAtti 3 CUCAMMu ` (f arry « Rr a of star, , ` ty sft' &��ry of the Plan"" too b` "i $ of , Rattcha� CuGa`r a. r her* y cli tify b: tht foliyofn9 R �.ra ! w ou7y and 9' rj�;larly',ptrmg,,0d Paz#ad, iI #nd ado :� 'ttt# P#annin�,� $ian �a3�.,`�s >> C��sI If kdkl�O Cuco� w,,Va, at it 7rw t'' i tfv*, of c�l1�iii#ti�,'r' �riaSiSttL �io't6i on the 23rd day 0 ttrch,.,Im 'byth 4 _MES: NOES: C9k§IiR� .. ' l 'f Foy 0 F o � QS L � Mrs tit tied�[[ 'r�R� ` q Y a N e k ` r , `TY ®�l°y��y yMygpy�' qu�VyR� `A4 1} w tt 1s4 4.0.1 . i ir!S' +ss ir. Y.. w y r 4 MK Y M HIN Ld kel Eb N � Y �M tq � '°fir �, � ``: � �w�• -:� � C u ' 1 i .. r w t• '01, d i Poor auan!,4) go _ y V i $e■ e� N y? .. q Gw M I y �[ Y Y N V " fi G ` q r•�M xv�� Y,+gN��q e�aw aj�'§u4 "$g{Ng +� 3 M cs 4 S 3 MQ�ty��. $py si ^aP N Sy v irvg .4.2 N q Y q & i ZiT it a`.Z` 'QL.° grr'�ij t3 �a jg a� a: � -1 X a & 1 . `g YqZ� ,1 Evil- IL : 4 Ny a S $�q 3y age qW� •" v�M� usn.�i� j�,� �, iJN V b e C NY Ntl r -a = »mot r9 y' ;, ° �°•r�. ,,,' n.!' .�: Vin. , 3 =M It! TIM,; -q Y w 7yiN�� fr.� ��$$ a$..��• �� 4'Q CµY�,��,+a+G'7,��+�. �.tl��'�'�. °g aQ g��w``u�b�lI Yq �Y n �°+' 'S i+�.�L "C pV Wwe•�+ in, 6Y -I` p bG R LV}. 1n Oy p YM'�° >... • x4 Yepaq ]h0 - ..! O t MN.Mgw i4,� u YO r� y�yL�a.? IM y tlY "m�µ`Q ' b )pA.' �•`" ' �Uy yam, . NR* �C4 Jwv �Y GGGy111,�^.ic� ��p�yYq Y' 6'�M G.W } v ' l At Umb r6 C �.+• .a V.. 6V .QwT�ily iYFn!.K`` '^' • t L �y�y S rgLr{*'=6 $ t4I! `.i� -E�r� N � �Ary', D•v^ $'�1�i��`GG'g�ai�ri.XC�L¢O! ¢+T"��.5� M'g y��gg$p + V�� - rH� KO yl °�i A9•� ral m .� +� rLV. + +� �.�a++N :. oral 1ii� r+ s gY s gr." lgug$ "plc H . +°�' SH Nil Sit # i K�`r LL:µ M G•L wN f,� L,� q�'' '✓' 4 N4,; ski 2, A11V if L .Qj XY� �. � a�¢ Y r+. Y•n Hp H .e �,.. 4H awtl~i 1�1 a. �I V ypyp M L TM Lw4CCS w �'�idk YY yyyMr �0�+ Wy.. Vp iA „�3 ��g, `yam• � 8� �; y�� °� 4 =m_-j, N�� c�P'J !�6 ��i tVL 5. Y�4M�4. SC Ye C f 1. y 6 H C 2 a �Sj u r 3 -C VI IL Q& &:Ii Y d w h I li HE Vy� It Fyw� C+ ��a•+ 'I� Y ` .. tey�yy G•=4 0.Y 4�^ q� IL x:3 $' oar d avd�A ypyp M L TM Lw4CCS w �'�idk YY yyyMr �0�+ Wy.. Vp iA „�3 ��g, `yam• � 8� �; y�� °� 4 =m_-j, N�� c�P'J !�6 ��i tVL 5. Y�4M�4. SC Ye C f 1. y 6 H C 2 a �Sj u r 3 -C VI IL Q& &:Ii Y d w h I $ o Ew giYM �$Me ^,a ^. Yya �q(""yO � F -01 ilia a M. r 1i' � V..:; � '$ am "►°,R� � �w dro �� .. o w� ". � i:V�•'. ie.�i iii'$ �" v S ±. n a�•i " a pf -a It h UNIX y+F -s. AY SNaq yE v aaQy« !$ p a via, M �Ti g L`AryIO Y$tibx ♦{.yp[.M i. +O y»wu V 4»i w I+iG Yw ltF N "1 N'Cw N NW � 1l' + A1O '"°x Elea: g I f I. C. w HE �a� i ic1 w �wC p myo $"yY jai s i ^p qw �''y4�t (��LN �`♦ °"µ f' L F C 1a N V M4"b LyN b ;gig YN 4y TN LLG'� VV~ N �N♦ ` > �yv G N V 4 ��� Fyyy d N Y� M` N� K1 r tl a y ��6 � to ay it O� .,, N7G •{c n,�, e� w M LL y w. N. 7 Jam. w A �• ya{ � z z y e ama'N qMM MCp p4 �`yt.Y► Y r_4 Y Ni! Ly N NaJ C v `Q��'p��� CC4GwC �� ® °°.� yVjL Mt♦i �t �NgQ �7 vd a3.� �'asw. w'c :ue�j« Cci"j ro4c g. iyo N H C.dC AC 1'•9'0 <fb -Q Y.,' ` -• ail MR °S N qC 0.w 'Fk'. *� p MI E _ NLNLa V KDYY��1 A �• j w: _ •mace' r^ j1.1y� ■■�66� 4 MPiM �aY. „S � M�Y O 1 ry tl4 M rP A ial INR �M v y 4 Y o. rtJ1 tin w 9 • _ p p Js- #P Na 6r Ja �,� -q3.v �i 1. N.a NIXz r wry 43 CV RiQ N a L S w 1 ~ pO� ��` N C� ` eitl > iNf C � �q 4 • �iI M q41 N I Y cC�ae ��44 �yy�N C4yY ��pf lMai Rj Y Lg2=, Cl i Y 7V V#w W iv VV9 W is 7a IN. e.�+ p' ci .., <.. .� .N. S p lV U M, I W CL U w. ti •�� � N'• IiPu "a_ ? j N YC w kit 's �'��.3 gig 41 9 O � i N� �►U V � 1 MU Ai E $A �e� w ^ N '. � P ,Aaw M 1y8}, i g a,yyyy� 4j�A � YR� N Qy K�1 l dd Y �R V SCI M i9 a Fit Z V's w.v }} ap a EW a uy -5 6R L L Cad mo 41 21 w y � ■I r�CGy/ is ^ �. at N C 0 O Sl , '� �.ia °� • nw. � 6Mtd � �YrcG'a�r.�ry I/1 `� +aML' L1W mow' �,4W r .l'Y: $A �e� w ^ N '. � P ,Aaw 1y8}, i g a,yyyy� 4j�A YR� N Qy K�1 $A �e� N ✓pOy�. �j yam`.' � '. Sa Fit Z V's w.v }} ap a EW a uy -5 6R Cad ._4 0— '� �.ia °� • nw. � 6Mtd � �YrcG'a�r.�ry I/1 `� +aML' L1W mow' �,4W r .l'Y: b.5 a ' It 4w "�YM V w Ozz 4-F Og �..r cpl'�� 4i d 1 .YM�+ p Zvi 4 140 � O yy{ if Y L G M C G (i ` .�' n i= sa'„ #.'•. ycaCi �« ,t p � �..�.. ",� ida � K a.. �r �. i Ir +ti_I#. M r a Y. y I R Ooti YC Y O wi ei N IL .. ��Y u. t: e � 4 «erg g ► � 3'xio� Ozz 4-F Og �..r cpl'�� 4i d 1 .YM�+ p Zvi 4 140 � O yy{ if Y L G M C G (i ` .�' n i= sa'„ #.'•. ycaCi �« ,t p � �..�.. ",� ida � K a.. �r �. i Ir +ti_I#. a Ooti YC Y O wi Y ��Y � 4 «erg sate: S � SVy NQ Ca <iRRStl ypu � .� Y 'gaa$p -••j yAS��p Y� Y.� : 1 sQ 1 4 � J in DATE: TC- FROM: @Y» SUBJECT: c CTYr3�A�vsC;Iii;eGrIe'AMOi7� "A ."0 ytL Mrch 23. 1aB8 197. Chairman and Mamb -% of the Planning Commission Brad Bullelrr° Cit}r Planner " Scott Murphy, Associate Planner ERVIRONWNl'AL ASS ESSM tT ANO VOTING TZMTATXVE TRACT 13823 LiNI1LD Mrfttw R"Lr "= A rasluential suwiie °l'dn a son Env e+ can „ °4iUK unit= nn 18.4 acre of land in thR lledI - liigit R €st. tntial District (14-24 dwelling units per acres located on the south We of Leon Avenue, east of 3avooi Avena APR: 201- 271 -, 75. Assa,:iated with the preposdl is Tree Removal Merest 88 -01, s FUVTR0 WENYAL ASS,€SVENT _ AND, BEYEte"_WUT - REVIEW 84.22 nusnt ra.irs PUMA - WArunu L.AR&MU rM"nzcc�Ar - n raquest"to to, approve _ s r : ri atl'aw twro story units "''aldhg the Lemon, Avenue frcnta9C.and to allows an irc_l!zse in density within the northern 10 feet from 8 1wellin units pe; acre to 9.5 dwelling units per acre for 'Phase III Onsisting of 255 condominims'tn 18.9 acrvis of land in the Mediums - j9h 7,AesidentfM 640ri�:t {1424 dwelling units per ac". *lr , l+ led on the.. -�'- uth side of Le*L. Avenge, past of Ray- 10eaug R APB: - 271 -fS. I. PROJECT -AD SITC CE=IPTIONo. A. Action Requested; App *oval of Ye�'ting Subdivision flap, Site Kan, ncep ua Grading Plan, C4nceptuabl Landscape Plak; huildinz e'evutions, Tree Rem; I Permit, OR $4-22 -ivendme�wit, apd_i 4i ;zee at, ai Negative tecliration. S. PreL_ !zng' : 17.87 dwel'lina units per net acre. C. Suh,� . Sir. Land Use acrd Zoning., . 1�* rap- idential; Lal44eWua Resiahtial �4.8 dwelling uni'd per ai;rtt. South Proposed �;fd "e F&%ily Resi !en �> Lop'K r r �i Residential 144 dw0ling vnitw, r acre's" ; �1 East -?' Vacant; madf � ksisi4ential ling��ntts per � °z Va$t `;+"daein9;� o,: r.�Gnder Construction, Medium -Pigh ` cent l t14 -24 uwrellin�Uniits,�.per acre) � � r 0701-02 0 3 -23 -88 PO Aoenda 4. 0 PLANNING cG! i&SSION 'STAFF REPORT YTT 13823, 0F. 84 -22 - ALTA. LORA- OXFORD March 23, 1988 Page 2 D. General Plan Desi���ygn_u`�lons: Project 'id`Vd. Residential (14 -24 duelling units per acrea North - Loar- Mediuts siwa;tial (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) South d Low- Medium Reside"kiai (4 -8 dwelling units per 4cre) East - Medium Residential 0 -14 dwelling units per acre) West - Medtap-High Residential (14 -24 dwelling unit -: per acre). E. -Site' Characteristics: The site 'is ,presently vacant with an average slope or Epprdximately, 5 to 6 percent from north, to south. There are 27 mature Eucalyptus trees located within the project boundaries. The trees are the resins of three east- west windrows that terliinate at the east bounOVy. The future Foothill Freeway is loc4t4'd to the south of the,development. F. Parkinc_t Caic0ationss Number Namber of Type No. of Parking S paces1 Spaces of use Units Ratio ngtire Prorlded 1 bedroom 83 1.5 /unit y`' 125 (1 covered) . 03 overed) (83 covered) I 2 bedroom 98 1.8 /unit iT>` 176. (1 covered) '2 c(ivered) (99 covered) 3 bedroom 84 2.0 /unit 168 168 (2 covered) (168 covered) (168 covered) Guest 265 0.26 /unit 66 67 Total 535 536 (349 covered) 7(350 covered) 1I. ANALYSES: A. Background: On February 13, 1985, the Planning Commission - - approve 14anhaven Master Flan for the development of S8 gross acras of land within the Medium -Nigh Residential District located east of Haven Avenue, ketveen Highland and Lemon Avenues. The master Plan iddntified the circulaiton, drainage, access, and land uses for the -area. t' addfil n, the Plan addr°eased the transition from the higher: Densities to the lower density areas to the north. In all,, the Raster Plan a f nticipated the, dzvelopmenfj. 936 units in 'three phases over a 5 year pertc�t of time, Ta date; Lan Bentsen's ft 1, -74� conSistitig of 308 units, has le em Completed and is occupied. Oxford's Prase 11 has been approved for 290 units and is currently, under coftstruction. 0 PLAktiFilG CIN+I~ f SION STAFF REPORT kTT 13823, 'DR 84 -22 ALTA LOKI- OXFORD March 2 .1, 1988 Page 3 B. General: Th"Q applicant is now proposing to develop the third anal ph4se of the Lynnhaven Naster P'T&ru. T�1e 1L .'.9 acre site will be divided: into two lots of 34.83 aciSis and 4 :1)7 acres in a:^eax the 14.93 acre 'dot will', acco .s` gw the development o €1265 condowinium units while the 4.0 ae're site will be reser O for the future Foothill Freeway. the buildings propose4 consist of a combfhation of stacked flats and taoyrliome, style units utilizing one, two, and three bedroom indxfNual units. The. bmildings, arre laid out to create building. clusters or "pods" containing o()en parkling, detached garages, and tuck -under garages. Rods are separated from one another ,by open-space and pedestrian circulation areas. The northern 'portion of the site is composed of two-story units and f the southern portion is composed of a combination of two and three -story. units. The density within the project transitions from appso,Kiwately ;`")6 dwelling units per acre,' along the R portion to`18.85 dwelling units per ax:rr across the southern` of the site, with the highest density (19.66 dwelling units 9cr acre being located 'pia' the central portion of the` project (see Exhibits "G )w In conjunct,,ton with the development of the 265 condominiums, the appliciii, is pr,pposing the following amenities: a recreatio ding cWtAining an indoor racquetball court, two swimming poot;t with spay„ three'tot lots, an exercise equipment area, and ;opeq\ turf areas. C. Design Revie4\N Committee: The Design Review Committee a es ey, T�`iT y, rok l) originatly reviewed the proposal for 272 units -on vaaauary -a , 1988. At that time, the Committee expressed concern about three major elements of the project: 1. Ope,,!'i space connections, 2. Grading, and 3. Buffering from the proposed single fami"41 'dwellings to the east., Opan Space /Grading - With the original proposal, the Committee ' felt that the open space areas were too Constricted throughout thw cite.`�While the project did meet the technical open space requirements, much of the open spate areas were taken up in slopes. These grade breaks betvi4ten building pads also interrupted the flora o"'Ahe open space areas across the .site. To try and address tht` situation, the Committee felt that the grading of the site should- be redesigned to provide smaller grade breaks throudhout xh�-goject rather than taking a few , -, Marge breaks in selected rAas�, K �1 _ lr J, u PLANNING COMISSION STAFF REPORT I! VTT 13823, DR 84 -22 < ALTR LOM- 4XFQRi? March 23, 1968 Page 4 II i 8ufferingg Recentpy, the ft% rgdei ve�ognent ed a proposal for tt `. `the of single family units to east of this site, As a resul% the Co -Attee felt that bulFfering was necessary to provide a smooth transition between t two uses. This area was of special concern becaute therd ai;e Pip" along the east boundary. , WiJ storm drain and eater h the pipes in this location, the Committee felt that i.i be difficult to adequately buffer the sites. Therefore, additional area 4'ght be necessary to accommodate sufficient j�creening. Revised plans prepared= by the applica it were reviewed et tho February 18, 1988 Design Review Commit �ee,mm�eeting. To address the concerns of the previous Commmmitte .Aa mbers, the applicant incorporated the use of -V*taining 1-ls within the , rear elevations of detached garages and pro, ' ided cantilevered patio dacks in order to smsi n4 mi ze the amours and impact of grading within the site. This created,rsrgre sable open.space., The Design Review CoWttee (Chitlo —.*m ick, krou'til) reviewed ., the plans and recommended . t incorporated into the, revised s9an a f»ll firing items be ' and submitted' for additional Committee reviews to , chiduli 4 for Planning prior Commission fs consid'eratiol: 1. Additional relief showed be provided obi the rear elevations of all si i- lo&ded garage structures 2. A diagram and sample of the scrii.ening material to be used under the raised ratios saciAld be provide. - ' 3. The diago- I grouting propvied on tine recreation bull ding's!mou d be redesigned. _ 4. Planter boxes should be providedc within xomo�? balconies to soften the building planes. S. Landscape pocfmts should be provided along the drive aisles between garage doors to break ups thit expanse of asphalt, 4. Retaining walls (3 foot araaitimum) should ise incorporated at -strategic locations _zgacent to open space are t,� provide not'6-,ussble area. 7. Landscaping along the east bpundary should be providd to the satisfacticn -4.' th±* -_C ;y En ineer ,l and City Planner. I PLANNING, COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VTT 13823, DR 84-22 ` o J ALTA LOMA- UXf4RG March 23, 1983 - -_ Page 5 P. Peepywpai�tr3ng techniques should be provided for Q Lrroes. } I 9. Detailing through ut the project should be of a high quality to crea c, crisp, defined edges, - 10. The nu p king area at the northeast corner of the site hauld be turf-blocked. The Design Revl& Committ (Chitiea, brick, Kroutil) ` subsequently riViewed additional Plans provided by the applicant. .At that tiw-, the Committee redo►.wwended approval of j.; the revised plans subjevt to they - following conditions: 1. The vine pockets.proposed along the drive aisles' shoulli-be a minimum depth of 2 feet. Pockets shouTO include necessary irrigation and be bordeitd; -by curbing.. ( _ 2. The meta4 planter ;boxes ro. se , for the be onies rt not acceptable. The `'j .titer boxes snwfir be iiicorporeto into the deign- of the building. The boxes should be built 1 nto coluck provided .at the corvers,of the balconies. 3. Nonuant sign elements for the building pods should be consistent with the a °`ry_ sign wt 'lumens, D. Technical Review Conaiittee: The Techni5al Review Committee revs ewe propose an ant ..v ;19, 1988 The discussion between the Cow�cittee and t,�. ap lioant centered around four major ltmt 1. Access to man holIS for the Storrs drain located along the ear, -, project boundary, "i 2. The undergrounding of existing oveYhead utilities; along the north _side of Highland Avenue, 3. The r��`rement for the installation of _automartic- garage uabr openers, and 4. The fencing along the east tract boundary. Storm Ora � Manholes - Along the east tract boundary, them is<�' an ex s- fib T3-o"reasement that contains a CiV faster Plan storms dkin and a water. line. Within the proposed project, tht4* sea three manholes that provider access'to the storm ctr iin. H* xl► the original proposal, the manholes were located :, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VTt' 13823, DR Se7,;2 - ALTA LOMA- OXFORD March.23, 9818 Page in areas that were not readily accessible to maint,enancL vehicles. Staff was concerned that if there was a problem with the storm drain, it would be difficult to get in and resolve the problem. Therefore, staff is requiring that the manholes be locatted in areas that are more readily accessible to maintenance- ,vehicles.. The applicant has provided revised plans; showing j`;d� manholes 'apt the central port'lon of the site and at the W,Aiieast corner of the site in areais more convenient for the,' dntenance vehicles, Un��d��e�rrggrounding Utilities Thee, are existUg overhead ural t'les locatea alone the norit side of highland Avenue. Normally, the policy of the Planning coamwission has been to require these utilities to be underground, with the construction of fire future freeway {,ending, it would not be appropriate this time,, to require undecgrourding of the utilities in 'that they m4c) halve to be relocated at a later date. Therefore, stprf rPcoai�ends that an in -lieu fee as contribution to the undergrounding be required at this time. ��s tiara a Doer O eners -With the product., r,���t proposed by the applicant, a� o7" -the garages are iocatA along the drive aisles. It is the policy of the Planning Ummission to require garage door openers unless asp 18 foot fang driveway is provided free -and -clear of the circulation aisle in frond of the garage doors. The purpose of this requirement `is to minimize. the number of cars stopped or parked within the driveway that would inhibit the flow of the automobile circulation. East Boundary Fencing A typical requirement for the eve lopment. or a mu i- family project is that perimeter fencing /walls be rrquirid, With the Lynnhaven Master Plan, integrated circulation, both pedestrian and vehicular, were anticipated between the sites so no Wall was required between the il'dividual phases. With the development of the third and final iliase, however, a wall should be required along the east tract boundary to separate the Medium -High and Medium residential uses. This requirement is even more critical with the submittal of the General Plan Amendment for the property to the east to change the designation from [Medium Residential to Low - Medium Residential to accommodate the development of single family homes. Staff feels that a requirement for block-wall at this time may not serve V e .best interests of either development. If the wall was constructed now without knowing the details of the adjoining development, problems could surface in the future such as double walls, grade splits that could result in additional retaining walls, or grading that might require relocation of the wall. 'therefore, staff wouTA recammerd that the wall be installed with the construction of the site if the .details of the adjoining development are known , PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VTT 13823, DR 84 -22 - Al TA LOMAr,OXFORD March 23, 1 :. Page 3. KM or th t_?: cash deposit for the cast of the wall be posted until the ti lls of the adJoining development PP;� known and the wall can be adequately constricted, E. Development Review 84 -22 Amendmentc With the-; development proposal, tne app cant a" h ` a?'To su5mitted a request to amend the Lynnhaven Master Plan into two areas: ' I- The density within the northern portion of the , site, and 2, The use of iehlti, -story units Along the Leeson Avenue frontage. Density - One of the elements addressed by the klosl;�r Plan was e raneition of densities across the site. Tht Master Plan states that the density within the northernawst portion of 1N slue should not exceed 8 dwelling units per acre (he maximsaall Permitted within the Low•tfedium ,Residential Zone gin the north, side of the street). From there, ° %he density would incroase to reach its maximum at the southern- ortion of the site. With the current pleas submitted by the applicant, the density within the norther✓ portion of the .site is approximately 9.6 dwelling units p;er acre (Exhibit V.). an reviewing,, this aspect of the (Ian and comparing it with the Phase I development, the D sign Revit Committee felt that the, use of tP& 7.11 dwelling anit per a,he density for Phase I resulted in densities in the southern A�rtion of the site that were too dense (31..48 dwelling urns per acre), which resulted in a project that was too constricted in the southern portion of the sit! and presented an unattractive streetscape from Highland Avenue. In genero�,',the Committee felt that the density proposed fpr Phase Ell was appropriate bacauseAt would provide a better balance within the site while still maintaining the transition from the !lro.perties to the ylorth. Multi-Story Units Along Lerman Avenue - To further provide a transition from UA, single mi %y —novas to the north, the Master Plan states t►Lat the units along Lemon Avenue should be single story. The' ,proposal Submitted by the applicant indicates three two -story �,Uildings along Lemon avenue, two rearing onto Lemon Avenue, and one siding onto Lemon Avenue. In considering the use of single story units along Ltmon Avenue, the Design. Review Committee referred to the oriptrial Master Plan which states that the site should be gradato result in a new profile fron Lemon Avenue which appears to ' match the single family (one-story) profiles on the north side of the roject site. . The Committee felt that with the depressed building pads along Lemon Avenue (6 to 10 feet) and PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ViT,,13823, OR 84 -22 ALTA LOKA- OXFORii March 23, 1988 Page 8 {{ the elevated building pads on the north side of Lemon Avenue (6 to 13 feet} that the intent _bf the original Master Plan would still be achieved, In addition, a3 viewed from Lemon Avenue, the appearance of the units fronting on Lemon would be that of a one - stogy unit at the street grade level (see Exhibit "D-2u). s� F. free Removal Permit: ;'din conJunction with the develoo=tt of s 1 s "AG _ti'ae app ida*fit has submitted a Tree Remoq requesting I Pormit the removal of 27 mature areas which are tf remains of *,hree east -west windrows. with the development of{the;,tract (grading and improvements), preservation of' trne�k is not practical. Therefore, staff recom ands rew.val of tics- trees. In keeping with the policy of the Tree Pres,ryrvation tard#t�ance, the trees must be replaced with the largest ,.specimen >sizs available as- determined by the City PIanner or the Planning Comission. G. Enviromentai Assessrsent: In cmple6)ng the Environmental .ec s , sta-ff-7fi—asTTentified that future noise 'levels impacting the sfte and the traffic generated from the site could have significant' advert,e environmental 'impacts." To address the potentially significant noisi levels generated fro', t4 future Foothill Freeway to the i6th, the applicant lies'. submitted an acoustical analysis which indicates that the Louth 1 Portion of the tract will be subject to noise levels in excess of the City maximum standards. The report-1ndicates that the noise levels can be reduced to a less than significant level by i providing a sound barridlr ranging in height from 6 to 12 feet along the south tract boundary. In addressing the concejpns,,relative to the traffic generated from this site, a traffic impact study was cond6cted with the original !Master Plar, Wee phases of development. The concicsions of that kpiort indicate that significant traffic impacts will result at ithe intersection of Haven and Highland Avenues. To mitigate they traffic concerns, the stucy indicated several mitigation measuires could be inccrporated to provide o better level of servictb at the Haven and- Highland - Avenue intersection. These recosaendations included the signalizafii"on of the intersection at Haven and Lemon Avenues,' the completion of the .realignment for 39th Street up to Highland Avenue, and the provisions for left turn lanes for eastbound ":and westbound traffic on Highland Avenue. To date, these imprxrtmeents have either been Instal 1;k:or!are in the procesi of being completed. With the inclusion of the re"irement for a.. sgsrnd ial1`,along the south tract boundary and the continuing off -sits improvements being insta'iled to address the traffic concerns,_ staff feels that a Negative >,Oeclaration.can be issyed. If the • lei IYRs PLi� �NIMG COMMISSION STAFF REPORT YTT "13823, DH 84 -22 - ALTA LEA- OXFORD Marrh 23, 198$ Page 9 Planning Commission concurs with`theseifindings, issuance of a approved. Deciara,i -9n Mould be r)appropr� ate cif the project 'is i III.'FACTS FOR 1'INDINGS: The project is consistent with the Oenaral. P'� an eve d ----1 Code. The project,;; with the added s�ftig Lion measures,' will not be de *r7 �Intal to the pul ?l 'z health or safety,, or cause nuisances or signMzao� adverse ,environmental impacts. In' addition, the proposed use and Site Plane ioglather with the recoeseended conditions of approval, are in cORPIU:sce with the applicable provisicl% of the Develppment mode a"d City standards., XV. CORAESPONDENCE: This item: i�as been advertised as,4 public hearing " n ec aiT"its port net - a r, no sent to all property owners within ee a he sub act site, aid the prapertY posted. V. RECOMMENDATION: Sta;f recommends that the Planning Commission approve Vestlng Tentative Tract 13823, Developmalt-, Review 84 -22 Amendment, <Tree Remoycl Permit 88 -01, and -issue a Negative DeclarAtion: i Rasp ll' i ' , } X ted, 8 d® Ci J nne SS: SM:t, Attachments Exhibit "A" - LocaEion_PRap- Exhibit "8" = Subdivision map Exhibit "C'" -.Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Conceptual Grading Plan . Exhibit "E" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "F "' Building Elevations Exhibit "G" - Density Transition Flan Exhibit "H" - Tree Removal Plan Res4luti -dn Of Approval for Tract VAp Resolutipn cf Approval for OR 8442 Amendment tea_ �I L LM S CAR PLANI } - 1 ..' 1A rc M comp] I J LM Fc VICT t aan��� oe::�otacaac�oo��r at L M T.V.P. ,C. V.P.c "A)RTf CITY OF RANCHO CUC-k,% 10 J EXHIFIT MOM 4A1A1�y Rim an "gym* h. • OU N 4 4 �4.'l{ 1[i R i K ® t 4 r r • N r� : r ." i is ate_ i• �� +,..•� rf�+�vr� NW-25 + u IM -M t� . al N6 ow h. • • 4 �4.'l{ 1[i R i r r • u. e .a • or aRTafl4��N SVAeL T" I \ " Its Iota Inn •re ar ntMl t ow OMW7 a4! re trlr +msitata� �- ,raoaaaa� s �.� . X - Aftw r' 4� f �� �a �' j� f r ,�: ,� d a � '6d o � � �� . 14 1t 4 \ V l w t c CITY OF RANCHO cUCkNION, �, f. LANAI C, Dj •,NC N �Y._1 �L..— '�1,,1 1 ".— ..ryr`'.— .."",W°^ l� [LM�_yr IV lKYAM fA.AwrwM G - j G � onw. i mt474TWr YN7YtY slkN. E . \ ✓ swan a roAw 11 I '- TG NArLH�MkcFING! d4 Ulf 7�C r .. I (LYNir�''I(.hFICN ltbi/Ht t)f wsC�...GLgsIM ,.. '.: . 1 rr z r 1 tu i If .� CIT, ly i2 r r 5t.ALL; r� �! creYrnwr.: y � ;C fa4 � �sMI is r 1 LW ► .f We # YrM M , a � �. 14 ::n� lip".. K] rrg' S , _,." : 'k '1�1- Aft ` a �i lu A 1k Y � y f"1 � '� �� e � �'�' �.. � ji ����' .: .`;., _ . �, ��M y�K 4' �11� � . q�' L a�:` \\� ±� ^ ..� =!�, °� wr..r ;� 7 .. "'.p' yA.� � i .a, �S N � E' Jul. mom rrwr OWN F: aw Ar wn r ... Is i l J� `� 1 O x n ...sir 41 NOW YI4 i� R � d ti lit �1 tix !# CITYOF ,. ITEN EXHIMT. 'ALL 16 -.- RESOLUTION W. A RESO(.UTION OF THE C. PLAV.0 #iii "ISSION OF THE CITY RANCHO CUCAFiOWA APPROVxt�VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 13823, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION AND DESIGN RSVIEw or., 265 COM MINIUMS ON 14.83 .ACRES OF LAND 1N THE'ME.9I1Wi)IGH RESIOENT`AL DISTRICT (14,24 -- DWELLING UNITS -PER ACRE) LOCATED ON TM SOUTH SLOE tEM AVF_4UE, EAST OF HAVER- AVENUE - APR: 201- 271 -76. ;a A. Recitals. (i) Alta tomi Oxford Limited 'Partnership has filed an application fti,.3 the approval of ilestirej Tentative Tract liap .No, 13823 as described in the title of this Resolution. Herein after in this Rasolution, the subject Tentative, Tract Map request is`referred to as "the applieatior -0, (ii) On the 23rd of March, 1988, the Planning Comission of the City of Rancho Cucamnga conducted a duly noticed pubis hearin•3 on the application and concluded said heartop can that date. f (iii) All legal prereiiuitites to the adoption of this Resol0, have occurred, 1' 0. Resolution. � NOW. THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Comission of the City of Rancho Cucmonga as follows: i 1. This Comission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this<Resolution are true and correct. 2. Rased upon substantial evidence presented to this Commissioc. during the above- refertinced public hearing on March 23, 19ri3s including written and oral staid reports, together ._*,,dth public /,td' ony, this f ` Comission hereby specifically finds as follows. ,i (a) *he application a r`les to prsr'= y 11 ocated on the south side of Leman Avenue, east of Haven�A>�,n4. with a et frontage of 657 feet and list depth of 492 feet and is pzisently unimpro�,,d an3 (b) The properties to the north, east, and Kest a0e designated for residential uses. The properties to the north and east are`curgently vacant. Tsi�- ,property to the west is presently being dev'e'loped with condominiums. `-fhe property to the south is designated for the fuiure Foothill Freeway and fs currently vacant; "and (c) The project, with the recomended conditions of .pproval,'- ="liOs Witt, all minimum de elopment standards of the City of Rancho CucaiaQnga;. and } _ ;Z4' PLANNING MISSION, RESOLUTION W. VTT 13823 - ALTA_LQEt.OXFORD - Ki rch 23, 1988 Palle 2 ' (d) The de9el opment of 285 condominiums on 14.83 acres of land... i Is c©mlistent with the Yidiumalligh Residential land use Ae4ignation of thR General Plan. - I 3. Based upoo"� the substantial evidence presented, to-'this Commission during they above- refertked public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in 'paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes a:; follows: i (a) That teptative tract is Consistent with the ) Generat�rPlan, Dey!Wopme t Code, and specific ) plans; i,,d �� 7 (b) The 0, *sign or improvements of the tentative tracf-'is consistent with the General Plan, l Development Cade, and specific Plans; and (c) The site is physically tultable for the type of s 40VOl opawnt proposed; and'' ) M The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environMental damage and acrridable injury to humans and wildlife or -,their habitat; and fe} The tentative tract is not likely a \cause serious public healU problem; and (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with aqy eastnt acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within;, the proposed subdivision. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered In compliance with the California. Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth j paragraph- 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition fsset forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, Tract (1) An in --lieu fee as contribution to the future uidergrounding of the er4ting overhead utilities (electrical and teleCOmmw;nica^tion) located on the , north side of Highland Avenva shall be paid to the PLANNING C!WALXSSYCgJ RXSOLIiTII 1� w ' M 13823 - ALTit l.QNR•tq(F RD March 23, 1588 Page 3" City prior to approval of the final slap. The fee A shall bt one -half the City adopted unit amount times = the length of the project. fronizge. Lemon Avenue shall be designed as a water carrying street requiring, a roticd: lirivewaty at the pro`per'ty lime. (3) In addition to the standarr* one -half street Section imtsrgve�nents for Lemon AW"s, a A `loot wide �?av lane shall be provided r," the north side o1�` \the' centerline. This pardon oi= `pavement shah}1, be eligible to cost reimbursment upm developmer of :he property to the north. ri (4) Exist!t;g City storm drain along east .'c boundary: a. The manholes shall be 4accassibld- by City vehicles which, will requtii the relocation of two of them, possible 4construction of a pgrtion of !the storm rain pipe, restricted landscaping, turf block, and as otherwise required by the City Enginw. b. An easement over the, internal drive / /,'Ales j i shall Abe provided to the City for ma& ance vehicil a0coss to the manholes. c. The 4vet '_> 9 op �r s engineer shall submit an 1 analysis of t�ze effect of the proposed ,project grading Rrr tzo existing storm drain pipe. Wasures Ashall, be provided as rtoL-mssary to ps'ni t "it pipee from i!Cre►ased loads. d. The builAing footings shalil be extend -4 as ne=.cessarl to allow the future replacement of the tripe. is) Pri ;`r" to approval of the final map or issuance of ouildirg permits, a drainaga study =Salt be submitted detailing how the site will be Ofttected from fTdws from the north if Tract W_ 12873 has not been constructed. Protection measures such as withholding ,permits fori were buildings in order to Provide a temporary on -site debris basin may 'be required. t, _ t( PLANNING' COWISSION RESMUTION NQ. `.� V T 13823 - ALTA LWA -QiiFOPJg Nar h 23, IM Pagit 4 c Dal rL gele�t (l) The following items shall be Incorporate<t: into the final landscape plans which are subject to renew and approv41 -by the City Ptannor prior to the i ssuance a '�buildinq peraaitsz :.t\ a. MaMWitation ele ints, for the building pads `'fie shall ° coNsistent with thk entr~,I montmrentaition. b. The wine pockets along the drive aisles shall ] 1 be a Minimum depth, of two feet anC shall srctucro necessary irrigation and be bordered by curbing., c -`- Deep water aq techniques shall be provided for !' allt� l d. The "qo parkingP -area at the northeast corner ;uf the site shall ba turf block. ;. j� e. LandsciQi.og alone, the st boundary shall be provided to create a scMen and buffer from the o property .tc the east. a pl"s shall also be I reri" *d and approved by them C.$y Engineer. : (2) The following item' $hall be incorporated into the final ouilding plans which ire subject to review and approval by the City Planner prior to the issuance `' j of building permits: a. Planter boxes shall, be integrated into the design of the buildings. The boxes shall be build into (,:columns at the corners of the balconies. b. Detailing throughout the project shall be of a high quality to create crispy, deffnsed edges. k° c. A final acoustical analysis shall "bte submitted to address constructs techniques necessary to interior reduce not" levels to lass than 45 CHEL. The analysis shall also address any changes in tht,design of the freeway. �� k 1 t PLAwNix Ci7MlIura R, UiTOK, t#) YTT 13623 - ALTA LONA,RD 4a:*ch 28, 1988 11 s Page 5 (3) A sound•walI "il all be required along the south tract boundary a$ reccMended by _the acoustical z' sngineer. The design of the well shall be reviewed and approved by the Plannin=g Coaeissicn prior to the Issuance of building - "its. / 4) A decorative t> blodwlc, shall be +I nstructed along the east tract boundary prior to occupancy =af the units or s cash deposit shall be posted to coffer the cost of construction of the W411. If the wall is coW; rcted, it shall be designed to elionate any potential double wall, wail relozation, or grade differential conflicts that may result with the project to the east, fine plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the° issuance of building permits for.tho wall-. (5) That Tree Removal Permit 88 -di is approved 'subject . to replacement planting as part of the a.erall site landscap* ccncept. 6. The Deputy Se.- eetary to this Cow&;Uion shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23Rd GAY OF MARCH, 1988. -__- PLANNING COWSSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC�MNGA BY: Larry T. Mcfflel, Chairman ATTEST: e Brad Buller. Deputy secretaiT 1,, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City o Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced. passed, and adoptdd by the Planning Commis „on of the City of Rav;ho Cucamonga„ at a replar meeting of the Planning Comission held on the 23rd day of March, 1988, oy the following vote- }o -w*tt: AYES: COWISSIMERS: NOES: C;!'4SIONERS: ii ABSENT: COli issrotas: - 0 fit iC N `"+..ri'�'� L�' :'�� gi4� -'_ sYe °�- '�"�;t N M a jean It, �. .�N '►�' ya•�� %���� -Vb S o'V' -1 w R j �a! rJ �.�t # HUT MIT. if UP in: a _ jiiv; � 1�w1,4 ` A'' JJ Ye 4'i N X47 Q q J'!�V l►M Y -. }, i • Mr t �i.�+i 6iO0�e4t�CYY� yL ^A L' Zvi 1 Isis NNNN ` a // 4 ` ®® g4 :SSA Y TL T ��TTII1 { . .9's maw 'a:^ h�.G qttt ant R... a N. ri his x Wit p 1 2 i •y yy qq t{�}s� f a +' .aN �j�f,•. �r� _N 1.. V. <'� �Ny, giYN m 1 T N Yb� � a Y b i ¢}i g_ F �...� ppp ��« N+Y a« � NN �'$•i gaa �y � �`" F Ns-° r'i'p p�Q 6 /y�l �YI.T Hn. ]C]�� •' ` Tye � ••' C _ s Y C _ •r q « ijE• y •' _ 'R �{ y_ q N ~V(ayyS�4A N6 +N q« s _ L `y«` O,Y9 bah. M�� AA �aL. Y� q '! 'W C�'t7A S6' }.. be Alf y ! ��pr%YNN s Cl.,g p_IS =� Ye^•,R Y� � a�gq j� z log O s �-7` '�Q��'. V. C'�p4 a�Yit57. nW Yr�j -v�+ iiYpp� iiiv• vyQ e.� d .yN iMV MS« 4 dA�i.Gj r_a.0 ♦ vu�Y �x ¢ a � 9EE�.. S& 141 ,- ' + a� 1 t 8 1 sN �ql zx�w:. tip ill N Qrb t+f}xM�^ ` a`fiy.41 +A° 3 ... N $ i!$ Q op «$N r, i D M -a-Si i RA c "21214a fl .-k w"y c c gpr .ICY . $� /iN .Miia.s 4 ^iIMN f r tl q YA ax fa I f{jMj f. �i 9 ef.1r- 4 cl lbr 2. «fix p�N �tYu 4xgiiN `•fir y_q y 3l Y � x: <lY 123 6N AWL p N• O 4 4 L MSG ~ C C} i r 4^ C W jr-.1 µ N Y p. Q .CV iLl�9y y LJ! 6�y Cpa�l d- rr±!■yy- _ ■p pQ N per. iiq{k�, ~�' �• 6 -®L is y, s,x_ yc w .s. i4 i � i -1z 77 {. {i r �r oeg' 4lela r dv $ Nuiei t+ly $N w I sSri ��~� •`p`i LV N �4 u�p� �M Q• sa fill v i 4�3+� y4y aK.� �i�4 Y �p �_� w.. Q@ �YR•Nn �� Ct'�4 M����{7 �i4i fix. w$ 3s° ;s' �e _yCw{g* � ro c.. Y' � 1 N w d up�. MM O �O tvt V � M V :jS� ft y 4C iS aw N 'Kl i. Sly • :1 b`.. Cr MQ �NM�ti r,�� =.yMq N,eM Ey.Y9 :°low $,'j', i.M■.gq� w�ytnrtve I,s. $Nsili a_. .a •ro'c `' a+N, +r,v $,'. S`'�y a eM" yyg y v; cl y Q y !CGS 0V•n°'9 a. pt'�. V �ySy ar yrst w �4 Lty ``l pwU {•y f..+ j V p > i 4a?� M +co tsw. r .$o s ac'.13C W�a�sai aaG ki� im -All g 8 ;:$Aa $p..`a.... Vh0 ;1 i1.Y II" Q r 3S.�l',i ill liar ��c��pf"y� pw$. y�yy:E C V�+i^ jL W fir. HIS" j 4M� �V gyp- -ails ; -.. -J 3 ; till a 0 an" Lw _ 4g9:�• z Ems �. y 5 V RA Sim� 41 �a io8 ...s�O1 .sd '" EE °' M O, �ce 6r�w ~ Yom~ i Min' '�± i g MM Y3Vp .jCJM.�aN ,�M Ofb�tpIVCC per} ��1L U. e�pfl� _r i - �Mny K�O Aw (C °�(�i!"py��9 O •Y iY9 �. w 4&M~ �igis Lii Mwo @>' AN.�i W'Y YM �wy Ka$1.C. N � y�j0 C� qyV� '�- _-o AY�`Ip w" L.V I'Oi. y•. V. iiy' 7.�..R Yi Y K his +0� 4fi i OV. vai+ C WyV, w�Qi �.ViPY r w ,_ 1 S a - sit Y1 a v2s Hill P 3 '.. ID Irp L N g� Y GV1l,. IL �y , xS$ H W L s'i N _ AI p ' COY OCS 1 a4 8 ga 1; s a Sd0$^ f y�«'a blat aq 6 Y ici Gµ ti C OAf wN fill i1 y ±q Q�j aa Ap �qqi $ e� 9 ap ON L sit :m Sol A f 2- is .41 la,: wy �ieL .' gp Y� �M C.� � 'a{q�' aC�y. M6 -O 00 tY.Y_ 6 gN�q WtlN ��fc4 0. '^ Yy •OIY X- N 1�` per, Qq O -pO LV .6Y Ny► Q M� Y YM, YLLy Y. �i1.�.Y'4 YT it �{ i O p •9A �q� RF IiCO y�Pp �_ 6'1• ys' a OP O,e C a., 1; `� y yi$Y�Y${r�p'+�..yi{ya '�'CN =�i VLf uu VOit iJ41AP R4.D Sx % O it l -5 »M Y py Ly �M O1�yy Y y� )1 4iN0 W VV �Bi i.7.�;1 #'. '!,� y6 p'';`X'G fit R all z CL g SEE ,74 3` :e �w �•'� �° �S4 �' FE of To H. ills A-V «age aj� m'i g'uu w* w LIZ z �iols3KW. Q ` Ktl. aL BEM OL ✓ 4� 4 �O W Mr OY R� a,„ $ g�p �✓ :s � �`yy�y�x ✓}750' �� _ �.� � Y3 � _ w ti� x'J�T p.✓ �O Kpiy��-v� ia ail ✓ L y \G� i ✓��_- KLt.Leiir� dr.YL.a+� ww 17> .a7CI [j y�ww, mid A =�/3X Y W Cq �OL w-. ✓� Ltl .. W �� M --..~ Y ✓ ✓g � g i� LS9 ^. n16� p..M G�+tAYC ' W.x 4T JvU,1, u it YAMM � ®O CV L .2 .�Nrr psap h tl �_ t ow ���Y.S ts•�9^ yyYqq� O' Lu`.aV 00 �YYlIY- �4 ; Y 46M Irs b.N ` lety �w Yp la C r + r _ w.C. NV•r8 -G �♦ ryl %`N !i yN /+Y. i `C N it N =j pXp,-0 >1 p!j' .0 yytl s 11 NC }COOL IgIF ®` +:^ /YYyy��I LNi V NO xyR Y E �`Vq sari pYi RJ36 s cN ...N.�a.. 4W$.. <. _ � sm 1°a .+ca�.'F°,►' Y ,^,4. N Y vi 7[ e - O G i AM RESOLUTION Nb: cf ., A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING CCMtSSI0N ' AAl3IiN& )iEYELbPlNT REVIEW tRi. 8422, A REQUEST TAT AMEN4 � TO UNMAN FASTEN , P�i.AN TO ALLOW 7WO- !,'"TORY UNITS ALONG LOW AVENUE FRdNt GE AM TO ALLW 4K INCREASE IN DENSITY WITHIN THE NORTHERN PORTION OF THE SITE "FROM 0 DWELLING UNITS'PER ACRE, TO 9.6 WELLING UNITS PER ACRE. FOR PHASE III CONSISTIA OF 265 CtEl 3O1lINII1MS ON 15.83 ACRES OF LW IN THE MDIiK -NIA 'RESIQENTIAL DISTRICT (14 -24 DWELLAG UNITS.PER ACRE) LOCATED D* THE SOUTH SIDE OF LD" AVENUE, EAST OF HAVEN AVENUE - APN: 201- 27145 -A. Recitals. Ti) Alta Oxford Limited Partnership has filed an application for an amendwt to Development Reeiew'go. 84 -22 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter, in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the epplfcati "� (ii) On the: 23rd of fkrch, 1908, the Planning Cq ssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the applicatj n and concluded said meeting on that date. (iii) All legal preregpt%�tes to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Capin ion of the City:�7r Pancho Cucamonga as follows: ~t. 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds :at all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution Vol true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission durfq the above- referenced meeting on March 23, 1988, including written and oral reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located on the south side of Lamon Avenue, east of :Naven Avenue with a street frontage of 657 feet and lot death of 992 feet and is presently ' unimproved; and (b) The properties to the north, east, and west are designated for residential uses. The proporties to the nor&j and Past are currently vacant. The property to the.,-.west is presently being developed with condomiaij �s, The property'to the south is designated for the future Foothill Freeway and is currently vacant; and ;i (c) The pro3ect, with the recommended conditions of approval, complies with all minimuat development standards of the City of, Rancho Cucamonga; and 1 -- PLANNING COMMISSION RMOT'ION Nb. DR 84-22 - ALTA LOMA -OXFORD Marsh 23, 19 Page 2 M The development of 265 condominiums on I4,83 acrWof 'land IS consisteO with the Mediva -High Residential land use designation of the ikneral Plan,, and te? With the grade separation bey. yen Lemon Avenue and the first lbw of units, the appearance from the streatsc:,' will be that of single story units, and if) The elevated building pads C6- I3-f4otl on the north side of lemon Avenue and the depressed beild4`i pads (6-10 feet) on the south side of L oon venue will 7sit3gat$ the impact t eated by the use of two -story units on the south .side of Low Aven'se, and (g) Thl 9.6 dwelling unit par acre density within the northern portion of the situ: will provide a W tter distribution of the units within the site while still Mintafning .e- transition from the Low4kdfum Residential District (4-8 Willing units per acre) located to 0 north, 3� Based upon the Substantial evidence presented to this' C4pmissian during th,., above - referenced meeting and upon the spe:yf#c findings of facts set forth in paragraph 2 and 2 above, this CoaiastsSion hereby finds and concludes ar'- follows: ta) That the proposed amendment is consistent with the objectives of the::Gonoral Plan; and (b) That the proposed amendment is,,,in ,accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and (t) That the proposed amendapenl ' is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and - M That the proposed amendment, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or Uprovements in the vicinity. _t 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project ha� been reviewed and considered i1i compliance with the California Environmenta't�� Quality &-t of 1570 and, further, this Canission hereby issues a Regative Declaration, S. Based upon, the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 ebovco this CoMission hereby approves the application subject to each and even condition set forth below. " PLAbNINS COWISSION RMUT104 NO. (� OR 84-22 - (FORti March 23, I9M Page 3 (a} All applicabbl6 conditf:,i�s of approval for Yarsting 7entatiYe Tract I 23 shr.11 app`ty. d. The ospuv Secretary to " this C` \o+aA`;�s4c� shall certify to the adoption of this 'Resolution. APPAOYMAM Ali lqS 23RD DAY ! PLANNUM CO MISSION OF THE- 1Y OF RWW cUCA 41N�4 IT BY: ...,. dri , a r+an ATTESF: ra , ear, DOM WURFEAW .,"..... Is Brad 2uiler., *uty',;Secretary of the Planning Cweaissiat of the City of Rar4ho Cucamonga, do h91164 certify that €oreW —N Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, .Msod, and adopt bj+ th+e Planning C ikon of , t,Ue City of Rancho Cue4miga, alt a r"ular meting of the Planning Ca;; ssfon held on the 23rd dory of March, 19M, by ':,,tht following vote-to-wit,. AYES: COWISSIOM: NOCS. COiIS�,St t ABSEINT: Ct tiSSIt E S: _ r: r �1 ti '•a 4� �t !G t i i 1 E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA• c��""` .Q4 STAFF IFPo�� �� ''n DATE: March 23, 19$8 TOr Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FRD'l: Brad Buller, l�!V Planner Greg Gage, Assistant. Planner 1 BY,. ,ti, SUNECT: ENVIRO MEHTAL ASSESSMENT AND ODE We oltREo I 8e7e53 - 11,11,111,1111, - n us r a war ous buildings totaling li 641 square feet cn 7.7 acre acres d, of located at at the , ortthe st iCOrn { � District (Subarea Rochester Aveaue' and the Atchiscn, T�.`ka' and San Railroad - APH 224- 121 -21 and Rte I. pRojEL� AND SITE DESCRIPTION: AC -bon Re Approval of Site 'P1an. building t A. lvatians, rnu"Tssualzce 4 a Negative Declaration, B. Svrroundin Land Use and Zonin . lior - acr:,`Ir ra n us r�i a7 South - A.!.'& S «F. Railroads General aia ustrial Edst I -15 Freeways Freeway Wiest - Warehouse/Distributions General Industrial C. General Plan 1esi nations: rec i g eavy :n us rial North - heavy Industrial Heavy Industrial tilitr Corridor South - General industriai/U West - Heavy-Industrial Q, Site Characteristics:, no sinifficsrt vegetation The propert $is bounded onuthe east ,by the interstate 15 freeway, which is approkmately' 30 to 35 feet above the grad of square iridustrial `'project with 12 buildings adjacent parcel to the feet was rQcentlyppro+�ed north, and -1 three- b441ding war'ebduse /distributioa enter lie >,, atross Roch'.ater to the west. 1r :. ki PLANNIW C"ISSIO* STAFF REPORT` OR 87 -55,- FULLMER /ROCHESTER LTD. �- March 23, 1988 Page 2 I E Puking Calc.,lations Number of Humber of Type Squa>+e Parking Spaces Spaces of Use FooV Ratio Required Provided Office 12,720" 1/250 51 51 Manufacturing 11,000 1/500 22 22 Warehouse 135,291 * 89 89 rniaf 162 162 * Warehouseld4stribution parking ratio: WOOD for first 24,000 square feet; 1/2000 for second 20,000 square fret; and ? 114000 for everything over 40,4100 square feet The ratio is applied for —.ach building to determine individual parting deRwnds« _ j 11. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant in ".questing approval to establish • ree uildings for warehouse /distribution and general industrial.manufacturing uses. Incidental office: uses are also l included, with approximately 8 percent of the overall floor area devoted to office use. Outdoor-, empipyee lunch areas are provided 1,; , adjacent to each builoing as, required by the Industrial Specific ",an. 4 Although the site is desa.gnated for avail service by the ` Industrial Specific . lan, ' ire Atchfson, Tggeka and anti y Railway Co. has indicated that rail service`tiaiaot feasibly e rovided to the si ~.e from its line to th2 south (see Exhibit R3" ) . The applicant also attempted" to acquire the small, -, railway► -owned parcel between the project site and the rail right -of -way: however} the rail company could not cnpsider a property sale within the near future, and the panel is I therefore likely to remain undeveloped (;see Exhibit Due to the loc0on of the site between Rachester Averme to `- Special Routevardk. end the I -15 Freeway, views of the huild;ng and parking/loading" area: from these routes are an important connidnration. The sight line study submitted by the applicant reflects that to east and, north e7ev. ions and wsf of Building "3" w 1d be visible from the freawAy, an;4>,#;he architectural s iatment - (spandrel glasa, fluted cobimn� "elevations provid�(l these 1t intended to iddretis this lssdtt Loading areas and buildings are. oriented to that. bufld pg mass serves to screen most loading activities. Lar - WscapWq and /� i 1 1 _ , _r PLAIIiiTNB. �QMMTSS?Oli !F REPORT DR 87 -59 FULLM5RJRW VE 1 LTD. �. March 23, 1988 Page 3' dttcorativ' \scrQ6 walls are also used to screel trailer storage areas. i� is also important to Hoke that planting WtHin the right -Of-WAY ;gar the Cal Trans :Raster Plfnting Plan) will be required in caniunctio6'with tho project which wfll`ultimately server as supplemental screening for loading /stsrage araas, I B. Dessign Review ' ittue; , The C ittee 'iChitiea� McNiel, j' Co eman re; a project on danua�' 21, 1988, and recommended,, furthW review pending rtvislons to building architecture, on -site landscaping, plaza trtment, its:, on ? VWbruary 18, 19:1, the COWItt&; # N'ffol, TolsUtr, CaieaWer S'= reviewed the revised plans for the P!g!tct, And darermfood that_, j several previously identiffed concern& had not been eroeepl*tel` " addressed. The applicant subser�tentlg revi the puns and; after reviewing the projerct on March 3, 1 , the C=ntttee MUM, Coleman) recommend e4 approval subJect to the 7ollcwing conditions. 1, AA additional coluiklar element shcAd .� provides on the south alevation of Building "2", 2. Landscape plants shoup, be provided along the i �tast sides of Suildfn 'r,11 should from extend the theist corner of each building to the refuse enclosures located on the t east side of both buildings and should be,, at ' � five W feet In width to allow sufficient � ( ' space far tree planti€wqs. Tee landscape planter located on the south Sid* of Building 2" should be increased in depth from three feet to five feet tq_ allow sufficient space fir" tree plantings P , 'r 3. A landscape planter five feet In width Should be," provided along the north ,"ido, of Building "3" to allow for tree plantings adjacent to the structure( -� Planter shoutybe continuous except where access to the future ove!rhod door is provided. ' 4. Field anaFysis If sight nines to. the east (y aide of Suildfng 3-Mould be corducfed from the freewsy during construction. The upper portion of the east elevation should be sp e:'ially'.rArked to ascertain the need for applitr"f"� of spaandrel grass at the °building corner. if Of `ld ana,lysis \�. reveals iahati the bu`il& _. is subieb. to views from the freeway -! aplica on of spandrel glass A\ -_ elements on ti�e=�ea' t :elevation of Building aM should bk; required. - d s' F PLANNING CMIS', N STAFF REPORT DR W-SS -6 MLMO*kHESTM' LTU. March 23, 1988 7 J Parse 4. Final jesigit of this. scr�.44 ...for roof- 0ounted eauxpatent sh*Od be 'sutttttittew for review, and approval by the City P101 10r. C. Technical Revise' Coerittaa: The Tttnfcal Review Coetii revie4ed ime project a s Ming df da»uary 19,- IM-'and detor*inpd that- with° ree4motd iwa Lions of approval, the project is Consistent w ";tt# C-3 4670 MY standards and ordit%rces'. a ;. 3J ' C� Envir�o;: ental. sess Won r 'liew of Part I of the Initial 'alllr an "cam, # br Mp o IPArt the Esrirowntal Checklist, staff' has' four: rt�fi:a�t Onwi -on sal i*pacts related to the development air *.his pro,,ect. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS -i' This pvjwi,t'ri Co` Istent with beYlndus� *E '' `i rea pec c ant and t 666ratl Pla.,ti The pk. will n vbe detrimental f'd adjocent p,+'np.Arties, or cou,.s ifi , 4iynt*.. t eavtromentai iepac *x. aldition, the praposed Site plan and bulld1nV design, together th recottWAded conditions, are it coteplian�.e with the Wu trial' AM S*iffc Plata and City, standards, r IV. RECiIFl9MATION: St�i= � reco� �nds approval of aevelo*nt Re�fiew r�u9 ^option of ttti:� 4ttAcht4 Reso`iuvion with conditions and issualice'u. d Negative. D*�r Orations Res, fu31,y itted, 8r City Pl Hari 88t6pae - 7F M Attachments; Exhibit -J� L6e4 lon Maly Exhibit 08" - `-itt Plan Exhibit V wariceptuatl landscape plan Exhibit #21 - aui'idirtg "I', Elevations bi' ' Exhi'�E`'- 8utlding *21 Elevtitions Exhibit 'IF" 4 building "3k_ Elevations ; Exhibit IS" a Frkeway Unt of Sight Stu* , Exhibit N . Letter >•r A.T. CLF, RMIroad i Ext ibit -V `- ietter,from Santa Ee- 10atctfic Realty Corn. on Resoluti of 4pr�tva'l witty Co3d1tions , 1 � _ 2 i till daJ TOP h `r.a _ ♦ � _ x _ ,. `k y fi f�➢l, ➢f•!N! ICM ��y i . (I cts - { F' 119 = t og M '4..JF 1 NI '' a �. r. l f -Lill ' tit Pat I AnKRAW f c %C f �a• ea• 7�' M crrly OF i Y 1� e E:{�x�` is _ ' `� I � �, rr • _ l(1J ie six i ` f ,gat p,1 1 #fie ■g - R `� �' ry'1•t Qom-$ f� .5` _ jj i � 9f CL ANVI vp m my wLti� i _ _ i� 'D I� U t c� �Q Z ul a) (L I _ � I t�t CUCAAWNGA U E ITY J rr fi- f E A I!mp ITIL c � 11.4 a E tin stw 1� J ITp'C+�C' it y r _ �r _, L D(,N- r. EXHIBIT'.---F..:.. .A� g r t 1 th -wE �43 a 'I i .— .,,- ._.�...�_..- DO # sc -44 F# Plus, 62M Bast shells straet, kaif " .t�ge113. Cali€a?nit 90m NOUtiber tP, . e Fills, 11d9�57 _; Mr. Italy Stacha Sales Gonstiitant. Coldwell Banker 17870 Castletow.1 Strait, tuito , P.• 0. Bok 363 city of Industry►, CX gm -Bear Mr, Stache» Re ?erence is si€,ie to .`lour eorr spondentZant# convarrsattoars tdncernin r r urt locatpd -at fhe aortheitt cordar oil Rashest %r StreQt and rightilstraet in ftneho Cuuun A91, our Station of Rcchntet; 'identifiad- as Tax -Assessor ibArras ^ `- � Please -`s adV�sad ilk is no`s faesibls i'or Santa Fe,,Rmj�vay+�opf{r�t to. adequ,,"uiy rail serve this �) te, whith,is yocated`rof#hetly of our A aii -4q _. risht of lay, a.dlacent ti � Ruc "stet Street. I hapC this advice will x!esolve the`Ouestions, your Ct�ar�y had corc�3rrc�ttg th us -- -of ti#is property;Jiloviever, if yeu have.aey further questig,% please be' o , SUM sut� tai! call . l t Very true ,our , � W, Dr; entl ey Oxfectssr ot�ntrat:4s N J ,fej `© l � ` ^1 �s s ,� _� Sati�� 1aifiiter�azain� \\ ' DeaeMber 4, ' 1997 , .AT0023 \, o if S;ta;he �' Colowolf l 8anJk*r • Co riabr 4ai _�stat4 Services 17700I�astleton #reefi Suite 100 '0 Sal l� City ar`Igdustry,�,CA 91748 l _ het Salo of rprOperty N1th tax Assessor, Pare t Dar Ray: - t Per your request, I' truing this letter concel�,n#ng the salt a•F thi aboae refe4nced prom %V. ,'kNAt th1S tf*e, we are und%'ri8 td consider a Sale of the Rrtipel ty � n,ral! III y � O posstbit at S'bft time in the -future bur not �Jthtg7 the tip bfra needed" Which is January 24, c c The A.cFtiSan,igeki!:ani1 Santa fie Rai 1wRl+,t5tany, by Santa �e Cai0:flc ReaBty. Thank yo!v for your interot. Slacerel .. ffre0 fey v Area. Manager 9 Property Sales. 411;i00iI511! ti _ � ,, i c � , �sv,n�_ .�_._+�� ` si+ �„ ei3i- s�/l.��xb- �•'4.'."`y.`�'- ..._,.S�._�..— ._ -_,.. _ .... .. _. J ,. (\ ..:.._ ..:. .:: 1i - i ?✓ r 0 RESOLMON NO. �\ Fa A RE§&UTIOX J)F „THE RMHO CUCAMOMA PLANNING C"ISSION ' ` APPROYNG DE100PREW REVIEW M. 87 -E5 LOCATED SMTEN ROCHESTER AVEMM MD, THE Ikekbi'ATE 15 FREEWAY, APPROXIMATELY 106 FEET'NORTH OF THE ATCHISON, TOPEXA AND,, SANTA FE RAILROAD IN ThE GEHERAl; INDUSTRIAlr ,,OISi`RICT 229 - 121 -21 AND U. -h_ Recita'r';. M Fulle�;r �Proparties l as fi�cd an application .for the approval 'of Development Review F)No. 87 -55 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in thfs Resolution, the subject Development Ae-v� r �� request is referred to as "the application", C 3 On the 23rd of Rarch,X1988; thae Planning Co W, of fire City of Rancho £t ca4onga' conducted a wei tiag on. , the applicaiw.1 and concluded said meeting on that date. (III) All legal serf l op }� qu4sites to lire ad lion of this `Resolutioir have occurred. _ D. Resolution.. f NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby Fauna,- detenaiged aid re�olved by, the Planning ComfssfC41 of the Gila of Rancho Cucamonga as),follows; � 1. This Commission - hereby specifically Maas thilt all of the facts �7 co set forth in the Recitals, Part.h, of this Resolution and correct. 2. Based upon substant ial> iiidenca -=` presented taM' thf s Coimisston during the above -rem Need meeting on, rch 23. 1988; including written and oral staff reports, th s £ommission hereby, specifically finds as follows; (a) The appiicatiOn 4pp`iies to property located on the east ' side of Rochester Avenue with a street frontage of 709..feet and-16t depth of 473 feet and is bordered on the east ty the lntel "�,wet6 1S l reeve }t, ands, is presently unloproved; and fbi The property to a north;of the sub3ect -jite is vacant, fig the property `'ta the south of the site consists of rail servile uses the property to the east is a freewayr which i� a roximately 30 .feet. abov; the. it subject site, and the propety to the rtes* is x storage, and dzstribut #on uses, and J ; ��ith light ±r)role�rle, service. (c) 'J`The property location / configuratio,,a precludes rail Dot 87-66 FULLMERAOCC KSOLbTtOM NO. MER 1. M, PAfCij L 23, 19 Page 2 3, Brse: upon the subMtantial evir3erts,Pr43ei�ted to this Com»rity n during the abo%�g- referenced meetl" and upon �Al s fhc findings of facts se : forth in parAynph �i and 2 a4bve,,;this i COaI , '4t.' t erekv rinds< and concludes as follows; J/ (a �`�mot theme -, ed p43ect = ism ccnsistent whit i tTft obdu�t f the Weral Man; to r Cb} That Vhe proposes n"'e is � in AccoMm� with the , obdective of bWt ) Oevelap lent Cade and the purpaae of tine d?stric�z „ -in %hi^h the site is 1rx<atecE� -and. , (c) That the poop td use is to 4oW)jaWe with f f az►ch of the PPlieable provisions of the Development radeN,and (d) That th+e proposed (is e� together with the ) canditia s agp cable,,-, th toy xil.Y 'tom detrimental to ; V ►ubli'' 1th, safta Yxi, welfare, ors - materially in,(urtrxt* to praport$asr or improvements :n the vactnit. 4. This Commission, hereby finds and certifies that the project'hols been reviewed and considered, iri ccWl,, anCe with Oe Californ- a Envirorapcntal, Quali Act of 1970 and, further , th s ass* sign hffraby-jissues a Regative Declaratlan. :J Based upon "the findings and cttnclusions tef f6'rt” paragrapiori= 1, 2 and 3 above, this Covo-Ission herdby approves the aPplicstl* subject; to W each and every condition het forth below in tom, attached Stands Conditions Attached hCreta tl'pd inevrporated heroin 6 y this reference, �I Planning (1) An additionat! columnar element. shfu be provided on the �;Wth oi�vation nf;eui ding "1 (2) Landscape �iianters_sh41.1 be 'Provided �Ong, the Est `t , sides. of duildi�gi.� alm anc " V- p names shall I extent .. roar the southeast cop¢rer oe'tich bui.,ing to the ,refuse enclosures Located on the east side of both buildings, and shall b :xt lr.Ast �'!IVj .,(5,) fleet er allow suf'f .tnt ` space for area in width t p ai-tings. g The landsea f' p arnter located off the sau�h .side of Building 'I shall be at least A3ve ;LSD feet in depth, tc"110w °szjfficient space for -'t, \ �antings. J I PLANNiha'C"Iss -101 RptiLUTION NG. March 233. 158 Page 8 rl a 0 JI (3) landscape pl anlw five feet ' i n wi dtx - sha�n.l L p RUM- kOng I„he trorth side of Building 3 a ° ,ar tree plantings edjoent' to the 791S irUAtir shall be c inuous except w vcc�i,'3ftO a future overhead door is provided, ' (4) Fuld xralysis of tee sight Tinge to they' east side of Building y "3" shell be conducted by the City Planner f: the freer during construction. The �iion ,� upper p of the Gast 010vatio►l $ >all # r _ s 3cially marked ea ascertain# the ow for t! 1.fCation Of„ Spandrel glass `alt the bn 'iding carver« If field analysi' reveals_ that the building is to 'Subject. as views fn the. f J► as deterLeined„ br'the Cf�iy cPlanner, ap icatian of glass' elements; pn the east eleva� ion of Buildtag "3" shall be requi r` . (5) Final design of the screen ors roof - mounted '{ equipment shall be submitted for ribviaw " apRrannral «, by the City PlaRrs r.- ,prior to issuance o building , Engineering Division (1) The existing overhead utilities (electrical) on the 4 project s.1de of Rochester Avenue shall be und�rgr+�cnn W gown the first port on the south side Of i,�e &T. SwF, Railroad to� the first pole off_ slte"`prth of the orp�ect"s north boundary, prior to public improvearerni: acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs flest.. The,_Aeveloper may rlgtrtast a reinhurvmon.t agreaeetri: t�n recover one-half the Ci+,y adopted trust for w'dergroundirg ° Irow, future, developcftt (redevelopment) a$, it occurs on the opposite side of the street. An in -lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the.:,1xisting overhead utilities (o 7- c4tion) on the opposite side of the �4;T. S _ ,- _t,0*oad shall be paid to the City prior-to the issuance of building ptrmit s. The fee shall ;be ones half #0 City adopted wit. , ataount times the length'" frrsr the center of Rochester Avenue to the center of ° State )-ghway 1 -15. (3) A permit shall 'be .required fmo the -A «T, S.F.- `i <V , Railroad for lany"work within their right-of- i#,r�. f OR 81 11 — h�lE.Li�ltr�RQCFIEaTEt LTD. � BArch 23, 1"& o (4) the design for Rochester Avenue shall be compatibit as with the proposed MY railroad Crossing }tm$ect. 6, The DOPUt *rstary 10 this Cosaisajon shall ce�hjfx ta' th adoption of this Res�:rtian .rj APP*9D A ADtlPM THIS no My W mw1f PS..SR} NG COM ISSION OF Ttt Ci'1'Y OF 6,& Cw CUCAFipI"" BY' Carry e , a °ATTEST: pu re,r P 11 I, Brad BulTor, Deputy Secretary of file P'tjinning Caaissioo of of Rancho Cucaeiohga, & .Aereby certify chat the f+�r +thO Resolution s and - regularly introd:ce.i, pa ;std,,, and: adept by fie P1a��, Rr� Ct is on -tire of Rancho Cupwanga,I,at -a rregula11 a tin rf the h ning isMon, held on the 23rd day o "arch( 1985, by the following r'oct-�co t; AYES: C�AtISSIOt1ER, r HOES: COM6ISSIOKRS: MEW: COMIISSIONERSt O r_ <<< i J. A 1. SCM MY..4 ITS it o^ ; S j wxs�_ R A do f� `w^ O to jig n � d ^ a 0.1 g Y.. M t l y�y(• � N y�y�. s G � � « d t 0701 -02 o 3 -23 -88 PG Agenda o - of 6 UZI Z: 6'�A �PCgN$q ni; M✓ 3139 w ;AIw$ ^`. «"� "fix 4 +sa RIAI T. fCFF � A, �4� ®r¢�. '��€Y�+�Y+sS�'C•wN 1i, #�y�4+aCw Y.T t� �Q�� q�M {6¢l.4+^`•".iN�� «�'r ,'�as9fKi�4• 'a.gy xv �+4 l• µ06~Ti �.a� w fj¢ It - IC t • tY444 'Y �, �r At us Lit 32 .55R ..= 10-7 a —J-: � �� � r 1. I a J its - >; i JCS �t[y i� N�Y ISF wi 7« �M'1yyS� p♦ ,ii �� .Ow¢ Sr�T'w f-�NTu ��tOL M C+yiO ft c 0. Wes• y u� c S 6 .'' a *.k.'j S 6. a� + «Q ••., ~ 4R 1J� + $ C t}«R C �` . it MY�' ��C�g1 NY'q+�' p V'yyy�gOw NpyVy GO 6� IF 'RiN6 >b a` Y X21 I -Uss�C 3'. a`4. Vk+wt °�>6pL V�M4 -AJ: u �rggO� YaV�tl.tx„'ta $+� '^''a">w`• �t �C Ni K•Q�nH rs4yp L� /l• ML"�yMbri �L Nr �yAG v7 �R 3rd .N. Y11 +rM. L•6 Lww1L�7 Q'. MML #, y Ap ® wJRi p�-p y9\ M e1 4 �L CNe yQ�' �� -• z+pA = \� c iJ'£d c a LY\ N IIKn .O `¢;�4d 4r0 -t C 9 7 �.Vnp T p..M « tdYM�^ .� W tP1 «1 ypp �O tM nO . , �:4- �si°ia y � ••�• � `rSj �`��y?t�q�Y ag$ 6vkG Ntl t�Q�'.:..t�4M YM� yRtt MK �!C AL 'Q .'119 J g _-- C -a 2 ass ;ag NyY ^Y14 `� I iy` a A � ([%�tt`® . �MN' _ • ^ M"�y,���qy A+'My.Yf�a I va 'c O �iU aN Ky N IISy A yr Cpl �~» y Iltt0 i i 6 IPA- At tj $ '� Y r -•�q 1q ``�,� a o1„s► e^( �� � Js �' �yii'��'� .-AG4 M.iT e'T� aR�"' � � �.1 Halw t flaw $_ E +fin waa Ow QNA 4 JN FAN rd M. 1 O ^c �^� :u� N + as - Sys. . I' I # -' PTL Usti �1)�'+$�q, p� CN �g Y 3 i " o �Y, ' + a��e aa• = w i •• j Q4yw gM My6y¢a YI r - wa. y� y��a�°1. fA'V w ^µ.,ya�y. I N = y ' . , stn Ci�B E 1 B- Tv IL i emu. 'L�iCv!�M b u w� aLn .�Ti -Y! � w.iV c.` � ys,` � ��M eS /.;� wr•w D a p w y�` r w a ^E w W . w t4 it N I•i Si N !iC V tC'G t+ C wl n va E irJC" ,_Ii Y, V s ;Rf W mc C LN ail pe CY? sjL I = Y� "Y $ Ads th, i its- �y"jV" F Ha is AY G 3 {E' "N_1 w P. d ,a " �� $ Him AA zo g 6 s e `fi "S t" 'yy" tic F,L g y y N 4 4W, 9 'o " " C.. • 'K.-; M I-4 "P. gm M+CL �" L 4L A Y b'V i 9 yy y ap p Ct 9 Mrs IEZ tt�,M"C tl w,Qqyy ','SYq��jq V"Y" y CG �« af; upC CL �9L /j � " a � GwN 4lYi4C Q "M� �L "O Y) • ::N_M Gw.'� N /mow C C� ��q@�Y �4qZZ�9 �MCSi .2, _�A y�.q' 35 �_* "04"R. "s.sit ®NM�JJ N eeCCG w+e `dYrt %. �C i.�ACe Op �;? �^L ,a {Gq��5•'3�C' ` N'4j ^. G C wYi°"ii Y •`� ~pC� QbN"~r IN's" �M @@ CN yGw4 yVa 'SO 3 ■R.� �w h.� CC {� �( 01 R �{ y w �L � � A � � 16• y iii C 6Wi 4� iI4 6M. ^Y Oaa T.66 � 'LM Lw Q +V �. $p { ■y N $3•► N.� K -9r 7K 'C1.6 F7V "YN Imo+R}'^� WYC w ■a �VeJY IZ K PUS 7n lb es ZZ ffln cm T -Zak MIR ;a 1g, .21 is Or vo .1 LIF If -5 a I !Lkh U.3 TL =0 W a— � I -.'- 1 v a tk I'l V. 1;1%. 41 , a k� 19 T SIM ;i v I -. " A ;; L of-�f —1 q1I i rve 1-1— '24! 1=�3 T�'z I- -= �.A I tt� . i 421 � Z. Ill! -a 1, f a 5i ", i S It If R v U 42 .1 A C. igs c;5 I '�j 'I t LLI I C6 i OGCf. yN ��QQaaas -aK All- a p�YrL C�.Yyyy.1C {�,{ tly � M qyA•Q y}�j Ni :+ w R:x Uzi k 93 *4 1 �Lrl �y d�� fa « ^ L itEs. {pN� �+♦T ''y�,T M �{R� y - a y • V '` ~1 _ LL iMM 40.x.. 'd 1 9 V o HE Jos! !L�.b 1 C, Urw fit prQ^.� �k �.Yy`�� �`Y� 'Fez L$QN � M aiSi ce. N'4� 4V1 t4B iiNf '` 71 1 Si � cc t Y M Cary 7 M YA 0 a�yw i..W VdV yy+ LIP'V HE L�CC0 N{yLr y�W h��' �C.W 6... KCbW QN G� R � Y Y aj .s KCL ys,c mw LAYS �eN NL of r =y a. zasm OO1I q C pY, L N ��M .a � cc t Y M Cary 7 M YA 0 a�yw i..W VdV yy+ LIP'V HE L�CC0 N{yLr y�W h��' �C.W 6... KCbW QN G� R � cc t Y M Cary 7 M YA 0 a�yw i..W VdV yy+ LIP'V HE L�CC0 N{yLr y�W h��' �C.W 6... KCbW QN G� i L sit N^ IwY � AXIS p A9 aG ll A l M Iva St' .40 fa��' • _ fi « aY y Y L cgs V 6 a r��L ^O.�O mqN yN�� •J Oi Y.M '°�. MM 4y p V Lo' i 3wR �.wt L Aupsw puY C NN. MLEo �Swa � «' wa, VIP N pN _YYY i . OI tKQ 'Cq -fj ♦Lf �`iv q a� �za U. Y L sY Nw yr �[ w fig{, {Qy 2p=3 y� 4 yam. . EC O iw.p au wt7l ' W C C..Ng." y° Dw U ^ i. 1C� 3 GN alpw a yy^ 4 96 .�. L. b wW rc 4t Z A .f CITa OF RANCHO CUC.AMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 23, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM; Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AM DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -34 4 development 0 a , square 010 ca rc"i�?cc building on 1.7 acres of land in the Low - tedium 741,1idential District ,(4 -8 dwelling units per acre), located on- the wet side of Archibald Avenu�a, south of Base Line Road APR. 208- 031 -17, 54, 55, 55, and 57. Associated with the project is Tree Remnvf: Permit 88 -17. c, - RELATED FILES: GENERAL PLAN AmENDi4biT 87 -Dili DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MEM4ENT 8746 I . PROJECT AM SITE DESL9IPTION: C A. Action Requested: Approval of the Site P1 an, C�►nceptual Grading anPl��lding elevations, Tree Removal Petaait, and issuance of a Negative DeclarutionA B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning-, r opp ng en er; g orhood Commercial South Single Family Residential'; Low Residential i2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Shoppin2 Center; Neighborhood Commercial West Single gamily F30dentlal* Low- Medium Residential (4- 8 dwelling unit, per acre C. General Plan DDeessiign4tions: Project bile = Low- Needium"Rtesidential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) North - Neighborhood Commercial South - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) Fast - Neighpborhood Commercial West - Low- Pr *dium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) w� e D. Sits± Characteristics: Fle site is currently developed: with .. ; ka" u-r siagie, am y residences and related improvements. 'There are a number of trees Scattered throughout, the site.: The parcel slopes frm �,ortt;.west to southeast at roughly 2 to 3 .�: percent. ITEM M j FLAN/ N11% COWISSION STAFF REPORT DR $7 -34 -WEST END INVES' gTS ; Mnrch 23j' 1988 Page 2 E. parking Calculations: Number of of Number of Type Square Pawl ng Spaces Spaces f of Use Footage latto RH fired Provide+) Medical Offices 22i4OO `igDo 112 212 r II. '`ANALYSIS, A. General: Tied applicant is propusin "to develop a two -story 6ullaing canto ning 22,400 square, eet of area devoted to medical office uses. The Structure is located along the northern poa•tion Of the site with the driva,aisle and parking areas located along the southern avid weetertt portions of the site fin ordep to provide a greeter setback from the building to the existing ,single family residence located to the South. Access 0 the site will be provided off Archibald Avenue only, with rgeatagr access being provided thrt+ugh the se;jior housing projot locateei to the west. D. Design Review C°gftitteez The ;itasi$n Review Committee (Chitiea, o oY, rau£'�F, or gully reviewed the proposal on octpber 22, 1987. At that +A, tide boo *start+ structure was located in the center of the` site with parking and drive aisles providers around the perimeter of the site. In reviewing the proposal, the CwAlttee noted that the building was in excess of the maxi" i'eeioht limit of 25 ,feet when within 100 feet of residentially zoned property (the property to the south). The Coaeittee status that the, building should be reduced to 25 feet or relocated elsewhere on the site in order to provide a transits -,; with the residential property to the , si*U. The Committee, ' recctmended that the rust accent 'dolor be changed to integrate with the existing Comarcial center to the north. Subsequently, the applicant provided revised elevaations and Site Plan which indicated the building located' along the northern portion of the site. At that tree, the Design Review '(Chiti'ea, Committee Kroutil) recomended approval of "the project. l C. Technical- Review Committee: The Technical Review- CsmaitUw� reviewed a Proposal on TcTober 19, 1987 and expressed com&- t about the drainage of the facility onto Archibald Avenue and the impacts on the property to the south. The applicantts engineer has completed a drainage study evaluating the flows 3 along Archlbald Avenue and ,omible Impacts to the property to the southoi' this propose&pvpjtet. _ - i! I U 0 PUWMIKG COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR a7 -34 • WEST END 1IMSIIIENTS � March 23, 1985 Page 3 The study determined that the flows witltTn Archibald Avenue would be 1 inch above the curb during a 100 year stoma ender existing conditions. Theref3re, flows could, ride up the existing driveway to the south of the proposed �rgect and enter that propperty. In- ,order to not aggravate thO potential axis #,4ng problemr,. flows from the prapased development are required, to be outletted south of the existing driveway. Pa an added measure, the existing driveway is to be rolled, if permission can be obtained from the prcperty owner. D. Tree Removal Permit: In conjunction with the Development Review app lcal: on, the applicant has also submitted it Tree Removal pewit requesting the ramoval of 64 trees throughout the site. The trees that are bairn :"'_,e5ted for sremov&i by the applicant are gener;slly located within drive' aisles, parking areas, or in future building locations. The applicant is attea�pting!to preserve ..�R.. ry trues as possibtaa generally around the Pori frer of tl te. ,in addition, the applicant has submitted an airrhar sty_ epora� which indicates i2 t-rees- wortiv, of preservAbIov or relocation elsewhere on the, site:.'-, Five of the trees identified by the arbortst as worthy of preservation are located in the general areas of landscape,-, planter arfss as proposed by the applicant. There are five trees identified by the arborist 'that`are currently 'lma d in line nth peoppsed buildings or street improvements that could be re ocated elsewhet. on ea site. lliese trees are identified as *Mo.'s 14, 16, and 22 in the arhorist's report. 1ne tree identified by the arborist az possible for preservation No. 15) is located in :close proximity to the building and sidewalk locatin„s. The arborist also has some concerns about possible disease to the tree. As a result, staff would recommend that this tree be removed. An issue of particular concern to the arborist was the prts rvatioo of the Camphor Tree tlio. 1? located at the southeast corner of the site. The tree is loured direct_ cd3acent to an ex4st4riq house and will require special care during demolition and construction activity. Also, special! testing will iw,necessOy dur4mtg the pr 3ning operation to check for structural weaknesses.. in regards to the trees t€; ba removed nn the sit ff ld e, spa. wou recommend that they be replaced in accordance with the Tree Preservation Ordinance. E. Environ Assessment: he applicant harcompleted`Part I o m e Initial— Staff has coeple d Part II of the Environmental Checklist and detev.Wned,, W, � the proposed development will not have any sIgnificoat adV. —oo environmental impacts. If the P13.. °4ng Coft*issirn concurs, issuance of a Negative Declaratior -,id be appr,..riate. TY i � PLANNING C�9MiFiISSION STAFF R�pORT` d!t 87 -34 - WEST END INh'ES'Tml� 3 1 March 23, 1986 Page 4 J III. FACTS FOR FItAIiSr I,n order for the Planning Commission to aPP►'o" `17opment Review, facts to support the following findings must be made: 1. That that proposed project is consistent With tha General Plan; and 2. That the pr- ,posed use is to accord reith objactiva of the DevelOPwnt Code end the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and 3. That the proposed use is in complisnce with each cif the app11cabl6 provisions of the Development Code; and 4. Than tie Proposed use, together with.=the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the publie health, .Wit 4` r�� ~:e, or materially ous to roper orrovnts in the lye COPRESPONDENCC: This item (pas been adve,t ��vd in ii�e �bai�ly Re art newspaper as 4-public hearing, the /trot, site postaw, a1W'Alarrgge notification sign, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project sitA,, „ V. RECMNDATION: Staff recommends that the PPinnin C. i 9 omission con uc a pu c hearing to receive all Input on the project. if after receiving all input, the Planning Cownission supports 'the General Plan Amendment, the Development District Amendment, and ran A, support the findings outlined lin this staff report, staff. recomends approval of Development Review 87 -34. Tree Removal Permit 88 -17, and i.suance of a Negi9tive Declaration. ResoectfKlly slditted, Bra city Planner c 86:SM:te Attachments: Exhibit "A "; -.bite Utilization €lap "6" Exhibit ,� 4ite Plan Exhibit C" - -ConceptU&l Grading Plan Exhibit "D° - Building Elevations -, Exhibit "E" - Arborist's Report with Tree Removal Plan Res4lutipn of Approval with Conditions 0 CITY OF RANCHO CU CA DRISION p o ,fwm C=a *mum `ally 'IT-7 r !r *Td TI F: ALL 4 , yj r. 9 s � A a rte, �-^•r • a 1 f' i:.. +1 •i••gt+uw�v►d 7L�r �r = 172 s • ice, � � I M ti a CITY OF EXHIPAT.- 5ErAtE i7d CITY OF TITLE- Sim EXHIIOT= • ' -a. 5C I.I: PA M -9:�. RTI ('ITT OF TITLf- Dl\-ISiM PUNNl, EX ' HIFAT- SCALE ---- r ( r' 1+.7rXgTip6 At N't AOr TA_ "AeC I JV CfsR� To A:: I 1 �` rt`ER+IdS /.V f cs�i�rivc i : °� �., I' �! NOW& Jr. W11 7T r t In .z oil A Z -to -F,?: rA7ree13 �{KfCtsw, 3 i.andswo 'AS-80 ATE$ ki City, {iP -RUCRO ;COCAMIDN " � � 08 331 UTICA Ci4XrXFOR TA �N OHSERt7A�iQNS AND 3 CCOMM�i3i5.'IMN RERS Li}£*AT A SENIOR UOUSY -MG Ml _*_MD:rCAL alli�,�UG I Comm F FASNLIM ANi 'dARCRxNAi' D RANCHO COMMON", -CMIFdRST-A kRe-ARM BY: ' - SAMV9% L". QTAPP,. A AOL '1SYBt ,:to Y W60. POW t_f 86N Aea Observations anti re9ommendationa of existing trees fo7r pres- ervation within nropos+ea Senior Housing and �ieaical Building in Mancha Cccamenga,California As per, my directive. r xnspeCted tha_trees,within propase6 develop- ` V..ev'.;- on November 17'," 19$7 located' near so;;,thwest =• corne�,;of Archiba!4— and Baseline in Rancho Cucarmorqa. The trees, shrubs and foundation punting are dart of three (3) plus residents or farm type establish menu. There Is a diverse palette of approximately ninty -tars $92f a, j trees growing,under varied oomtiinations of cultural carp- i.e., J irrigation, pruning* i. %ertilixat on.' T"he enta.re site will be broken down for identification ptarposes. between Baseline with tweet *? -eight T29) trc?s and Archibald site with sixty -four (64) trees. The criteris for presr ,r&E' on of �pes inval es a mutli st s, Process % .a of identifying the trunk bon�?�t oh, growth rates, structure,., pies- 1 j ence Of` insects, and.. disease, crGwm development and most import- ant, it the lif e a ectenanc y More �p- yak outake into `cod - sideration the foliage, color, density, ndsize, with the new growth consideration rust be given to the *paarance of buds i.e., color:, ,size, and shape. The trur:k,concerns are the c��xlitieax r 1, Using, extent of wood decay,' `anti niechani -al ipAurxes. An In- specr.io.n of the toot system Would check- fcr color, lopatio,10 and root z i.a.re. f J + dt �y , TT / j Trees they �� - stita33l `far preserving are numbered on er %lased C" , L' 1. tzee loca rota maps, Plut' 9,ener4l dat4i relating to the Preservation. Treece that are net suitaLile for c, Presex xzii axe 3 4sed l)n such irTms as electrical_ realtne, cites n 'tiisar.� ,ai gxo�stk� x te, presnce a of decay, structural„ weakness, ' azid, fdie•�ase, suns *ival con - didtions and life The trees ax,e existinf in a soil {recta) an4Z canopy tleavea`t viro.,ment, they have estabilshed over the past ten i of ar ferry ( °•0) plus years, Of growth, 4 e QinzdBnt. and limb structure. Pre- cautions must ba exercised to P'p� r'e food prui at4tion 40r con- tinual growtrc z9ocess. Hi;srl�ption of the physic asl "retie sbil and canopy relatioaa rsapS will result, to i:n,Greaseci. scats, liability and plant mortality. Trees must be PreserveOs withilt I i a natural �. or tmdisturbed envi.rbr►ments. DATA r"ORM.fi %04 « D.B.H.: T,-ameter at Breast Height. T }1e trees diameter mgr suzed I at four point five feet (4.$') above gra8e. I H.R.: A electrical resist4 ce, ( %i lOhms) measurement ind oating relative tree health,, Trees w.i.th a lower E.R. grog fate;. ar and have more v% or t + hen rhos. with a higher t R� j�B.A.: The recommended d'stance (radius) from bag Al area �of urediturbed so; -'kl environment.. Iri.is is � any `cr;r,.,tructiort actvit �:" c`R�tcial, distance. thin this last "ice could See let ",zt.�ar•..�a�ss � Sep pree', t� e{i€t s efiiremets z , s. ri '71 re a %" d tioatal site ii 6pections fot preservation conc`�t . Sclneral ctanmarats from visual, inspection of trees, : Structure in ca#Ppy, branch attachment and tip elongation. I f ~aes are re- Vy Ice, ctablie it will be ,toted. ARCHIBALD SITE '\ Cinymmoman campiiora, (CarTV,.er tree) {j U!.B.H, - -37": E.R. -6, B.A.-12" One of the largest trees on the property, , it will ,A e4 special sate dur-ing ;daLnolit4on and construction act,iv°ity':, J Also will require speciAl testing during pruning opera- tions for structural weakness. (2) Eriobotrya_ na onica', (Loquat) Good ovorai?. 4 fV��t and shape and is rel.acatWole. (3) Abies (Fir) aupl 't. B.A 6 rl Tree is in Very good cAldition, not a comtROnl y gr o %n pl,int. 11 (a) Chanaecvnaris Supp (Cedar] j c D.B)_#H.• -12P EsR. -8, B.Afi- l wne of tho few Cedars doing well in this locals" (5) Chamaecypariss Su 2. (Cedar) D.S'..U. -15, E.R.- 7,B.A. -B Very good overall condition. (6) Abies, (Fir) supp. D.E:�-H. -B, E.R. -4, 5.A -6 ( Tree is in very good condition, not a co%monly drown plant. ( �s (7) Firms halePensis (AIe PPo pine} - ri. D.B.H. -15,,: E.R. -7i B.A.-12 Very strop =' and duracle pine „speciet� with Iifespans near two lhud ' (2001 years. (8) Pinns halepensis, t,leppo pine) D.B.H. -15, E.R.-6,, B.' .,-12 Very strong and durable pins species i�\ s fespans near twO hundred (200) years. (R) Olea Europaea, (olive) ' 45.1 MultisteMs, E.R.- IirB,A. -$ Very handsome tree with natuga; -good structure ar(u form,. ' Relocatable t+ () 0) t'I Pinns iralepensis, (Aleppo ine) FOP pine) Da.B.H. y�. �y Very strong and durable pine species witi, IJ�f ,,�5 pad;, e= (113 Pinns Yialea�ensis, (Aleppo pine) D.B.H.-13.5, E.-R.-5 B.A.-12 r One-,.of the most 0;ealthy Aleppo pinf(s. (12) niae7cs torreyana su .. (torrey pinta) 1 "svitec(. Zi`ery ,healthy specimen that is envi�xumeAtaly 9 (13) P3nns ha�3e ensia. (Alep1 p�3 4�..R. ^i, S.R. -12 ` Ver y rte, an' pine sp ec� e� 5' �an durable wth lifespatns near twoa hundred. (200) years. -v o (14) Pbrturl mar arita. ,(kumquat) �r Mu 3 ti ptamr V'�ry A.i e aps e- it good patiq�, t�ee.� „ G ltelocati le .1 (15) Fraxinus vrelutina ' ASaugstq' G004 specimen, vei*,, good full, ���s�r, some lnsacts'! 4,nd disease, concerns„ (16) Eriobotrya Monica, (Lgc,u L -9# g. rl Gobd,:cvera�- form and hape _ (17) Cupzi ssa_ rvpaLZ�s, supp.,, ° (ty rsas) A..13.ff. -10,5 f Es Tt. -1t3, 2i.A. -i3 Environmentaly'suited evergreen.':, - f 18) r z,i uidamber, '4weetgum` D.B.H. -Aj, E.R. --9 B.A.-6 ti ~c %111 ad&pted deciduous tree, (19), Fraxinusvelut na, ,' Modesto l E.R.. -9, B.A. -8 ' Good specimen, vary gabd full color, ,4ome insects and disease concerns. r' (20) Qlea Eurppaen, (olive }' - i� ( multi- .5temr. .R. -7 U. B.A. -.g Very handsome tree with natural good structure and torm� Relocateble , (2i3 Acet saccharinun .(Silver maple) D.B.H. -13.5, E.R.-7, S.A. -12 Fast growth, but does-not have a long lifespan. (2 2) Lagersteroenia indicu, -ape myrtle) All Three (3) 24;` i rx s,_4e gees' i.i planter would r�,�locate < 1. BASELINE SITZ Y ` St f 1) iir�uid� � e�, � t11�We6:E:gUm? D.B.:i.413?♦ 1� , 1� Tree nee4s. Plea' y of suh ens? roan to achi4we max I imuto size and beauty, Almus yarvifolka, (Chinese tvergrean Elm) Overall a vary 'good sgsgi0s• � i - ( 3) Plata n s yacemosau) Ef Wifory a^ Sycamore) 1 A California natzvs,;'clood overall trek; � � ,, .This represents a pnelimanar� repbrt of tx� ,bs sui f ab- .e' for' prwser -- vation. }tual ,%uantif�cation-of the irr•:."' I type tnd schadult :soil fex'tilitx preco�,ti,on,,tests, amount and �4rpe of,,organic ma- 99 erWalr fertilization, soil conditioning;x'equiremahtso S pecific I tree pruning, r4placem6nt.` and relocation specs` fieati �np would re- quire a4ditionai site inspections to ensure accura.e representation. s, Any questions regarding' this report are -% elcoried and. your. interest i i ! j is ap(prediated. y Samuel L. Xnappa Consulting AYborist i U Xnapp Associates 4 tt pe i e2 Tg 1Ze.CC? G � � w (sL yd rf, ,01 f ` It t r ► � t n x n j /c1Y 77 "� pRESERVATIOid REQUIREMENT FOR nTETRB TREES 1 -1 corrective pruning to Arboricultur4l standard for tree pies.< t n in urban dev'elopinent, (Certified Arborist preferre$•i , 0 2 Establishment of and bed soil Zone around twee bases, set at a 12 %,l of soil esuface width,, )rLat r to potential trunk d o 5. clearing of dense vegatation and retention of all .t natural leaf litter beneagth cainapie:, installation of wood chip mulch on a needed basis. r 4. Where soil has been compacted or otherwise distur- bed in the root one area (particularly under canopies) _ fertilizations;eeration and watering via soil lnjection of all a.ccesible in i soil the toot z6n' e.. 5. Installation of dri * e rri p yp tion systems with -, capacity for periodic deep watering, during and after development. Water every 30 day period of insufficient rainfall. b. installation of chain link £e«ing to protect trees l during development of tK4 tree area. Chain link fence should extend to drip line or well. beyond on specific treet. 7. Examination and docuttentation of each "tree, with j specific maiptenance /preservation requirements. 8. Trarsmittal of recommendations and specificatiorfs for continuing tree maintenance t� parties or indiv- iduals res snsiksIe for tree ` >ztM.,: landscape management on completion oZ az`a development; n A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAinONGA i)LAN ING C"ISSION APPROVING DEVELOPRENT REVIEW NO. 87-34, THE DEVELOMIT OF A 25.000 SQUARE FOOT MEDICAL G FICE BUILDING ON 1.0 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW44EDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT ! (GENERAL PLAN A ENT PENDING), Lamm ON THE.#TEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVM Y.*, SOUTH OF BASE LINE ROAD - APR: 208- 031 -17, $4, 55, 66, AND 60 A. Recitals. (i) i°est End Investments has filed a� application for tht approval of Development Review No. 87-34 as described in the titl(� of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Devel: yicnt Review request is referred to as *the application ". (ii) On the 23rd of Marcie, 1988, --the Planning omission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on-the application and concluded said meeting on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoptiQ4 of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. W .J 'THEREFORE, it is hereby found, Teter fined and resolved by the Planning Commi sior. of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Ct mfssti%iq hereby specifically finds that all of # -_� facts set forth in the Recif 1s, Pact A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon sLibs antial 16vidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced mecttig on March 23„ 1988, including written and l oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to prGpertf located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Base Line Road with a street frontage of 260 ?Let and lot depth of 283 feet and> i5 presently improved with single family residence; and (b) The properties to the north and east of the site are designated for coacaerct�I uses and are developed with shopping centers. The properties to the south and east are designated for residential uses and are developed with single family 3ac."s. (c) The applicant has submitted a General Plan :Amendment and Development District Amendment tO tb$nge 1,be land use des'gnation from r ow- Medium Residential to Office- professional. pith the approval of the Gefteeal Plan and Development District Amendments, the project will be consistent with the General Plan and meet the intent and requiresent3 of the Development rode. PLANNING COb ISSIQ RESOl.t 11ON HO.- DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -34 WEST EN6 March 23, 1988 Page 2 3. based urn the su"tantial ,t2vid� nce pd esented to thi, Commission during the above -refer cacod meeting .nd upon the specific finding, s of facts set forth in paragraph I and 2 &L�jVe, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as foil tw1: (a) That the proposed 4roject is consistent with the ob�ectives of the General Plan; end (b) That the pmosed use ,:is in accord with the objective of the DevOopment Code aM the purposes of the district in which the site is located; ard (c) That the proposed use is in compliance r'ith each of the applicable provisions of ),the Development Code; and (d) That the „ propos=ed use, together wig, rite condition a?plicabte thereto, will not be dutrimentil to tie public health, sat ty, or welfare, or Materially injgricws or lmproveee�its in the vicin't- 4.,' This Coamni'ssion hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Com i3sion „hertby issues a Ncg4tive Declaration. 5.. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth ir. paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, Vils Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditic-is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference:. planning Division (1) The r=ust accent color shall be changed -to integrate with the existing cc rcial centEr to the north. The color shall be reviewed and approved. by the Design Review Committee prior 1:o the Issuance of Z_ tntilding permits. (2) The removal of the 64 mature tr' require ,} replaeeeEent with the largess: nu0ier�. .4rown trees available, as determined 5yv,.the City Planner. The ,U applicant shall submit a.plarnd a list of the tree species, height, and .trim circumference as measured . twenty -four Aches from ground level; for the 64 existing tY 1es. The applicant. shall submit doctmientatift of replacwaent, including a plan, to the City Planner prior to the removal of the trees. �' KI PLANNING COMMISSION RE21LUYI0N CIO. n DEVELOPSENT REYTEW 5743 -- -REST ENO_ March 23, 1988 Page 3 t3? A acontfi -k v;411 shall .'.Ge required along the sautA trQCa��y 11F wall wnl1 terminate far :nc�,gh hack from Archibald Avenue to, avoid, any disrmption to the rOOf _icste* of *N UAroh Ta46 at the southeast corner. The de 'igr,F of thV waall "shall be shown 'an the fift'l. builds" zlani, and shalt be ravitttvd and approved V th4- �`'ty P"Unner prior: to the isc urtrece> Qf grading permits, l 'She` driveway at the 4ou€hw t comve of the site shall bt'=.tvrf block 'to provide wrose" access kuwws thjs ;,,ssite and< he site to the w��.� . Th+e turd blodR shall be �4ncoavarated fitto Elie final landscape flan which shad be r�esriewed a�r6 approved V -the City Planner prior t-i the issuance of building permits. I ineertnc, Mvfsfon (1 ) A private `drainaga, easement in, favor, of '00 � erty � to the west shall be proild'ed along tyre shath+er r property lint. (2} For the Arcgibald. Avenue ght 1�*nes3 shall to plotted opt then landscape plans to assure adequate safe, unobstructed stopping sight alstance as approved by Vie City Engineer, iJ (3) *NO S *6ppinq ft, Times" zone will the regaired on Archi bal d Avehre. (4) Drainage frm the site Shall be oatl,etted ortrto Archibald Avenue in such a Manner to net cause daange to the property to the south as approved by the City Engineer. The outlet facility coald t1 consist of a paav drain ar pipe and catch basin systeae outletting south of the existing driveway adjacent to the south property line and the rolling, of said driveway if permission car:.,�e obtained frown the property wners't� = ,� '"�rgency access ewaont in favor of the property to the west shall be 1.4rovid*d to ensues eweergmy ingress and egress to, Arcftj a�Id Av "ue. w" S. This, Btpu; y -, Secretary to- this" CORWission shall certify to the adoption of this Oesolu ionw Wt)+ii �r�.pe, Naga � �( ,11 Q AP VED AND ADOUD 71#1-S` 23RD DAY OF MARCH, 1988« t� c PLANNIW CO Mj$SIQ' OF THE CITi OF RANCHO CUC*i arrY T. _wmer F. an k ATTEST« llP' I,a Bred BuiTer, Depu 4W�tary of the plannt � sufi of G� F Rtanch Cucaft a, do $riaL� a t fp that for a iiest�l eiri<on x W' t w °9u l art Y i�str uoed ��, err ' need by thii pl annf ng Coeds n t� �' Cl 'tg of Ran6 c at�,ausa a, ati. ?s replar mati die the pT'anning Gowsa xsf obi. the 23r §f�. tr'ch, 1988, icy u'l vote-#o- i � . A 'EFL: COMMISSIONERS: ca NOES: C"ISSIONERS. " ,� � 11PS�Itili �OiSSS1�R�' c. u PR H;Q .e y..a'Q Y ill 4EW ... • �' ii u a 'u ... w s. r ar «m.'�tIB ..u� 'wg Nea"""t �g�f1ffY lli0 ��f`.Wqg.�., 9f;W, 6 Tq ♦�j�[ Y 4`.. ,61h -.�Yr I—Ia ei: Nw��� , ���� �� �� � ����. gal .: Ids Film �� � � �� �_� °.. 5 M AR sit r SEW =s� " i ri i .r lv ., o w'1 I • wa \ t _. ;.� lu111 d. vwy N��4WY V � NHK ]i Iii y45syr ^,q» a Q V W M new aw . a Aj M Ng 1' y If N ai u3 k ol F =`. n a— �ru��yln..A��ais� aoi�.�l'�st if ,�`Yp u� 91�BY 4'� qo pill ivxi� $1a�E' v,'„»,r �°n. `1L }9pF'yyypp ..� I yw .�i " it Aj r. » g L Is B Log ic ILI Ell lit, fit oil IS Valk M ^ Yom, "NAS 4 4 AQ 4 X 1.2 gill kit 944 �_.:$ il'{1 it- s. �° �; i.� VIoaHwC u °a o a i i$ s *�° a Es= • » �ai , 'a^.,° y qt�A � �1g4 c iw� " '"�L °,�",'�4 . ` a tr '♦� -wgId ra.j C ¢ 5 :. _ i s N 6f i O o. H Y A mj� 1� .+ "Y S.Ci Sib Us. y ,¢4 � Wq '^ u .t. '�' �.t✓fra�.. is�_A'r t!+s ,s tau �u^'9 � i i 1. 1P1 i4 N M 'r 4 l -- «c v .• �' u ^ Q '4 N It" Y, It Y .1 €' $ fig - � o�$`aSm #�° $ -min VIA s Ki J -4n.�Y Oc aoil �� � �C ��V ••5��••+��K'A��O� V LN�WW`! � SSIK41 1 g ODIC E. All AE- p^Q'P Lyy e l�tiwra�s$� w 't + -- - N a tw a if sir i �Ln� y 6 . y¢ Y of + s. L�e.1G m airi• gym' ° �� 3�wg' q } Se AN V la E:� $ a V K.i��� � 2� �g C$gt �� r'19M; ��,q�rN • �� � � g� a j(Vy y5?pt y� C fig.? C� �gI Y'1daa ,,gg Yk. eg�.r ggL�i yr 41 C N 4� QY Ka .D Co% CB lci 5 w 4. p S A µd oo e " g - 0 U fi N OU W MM 20 1W a UL k 1ID b py O y ®r `.— a K v g d ,Z a- Y O'� ' O~ qr..Yj A4 t 1 ,NS a�r$g'�{ .o.��ez� a a(. e.CCy " rr I RYCnYr.a o "d N°' LIIN p C O YOK W j!{Y��e Nmr aP q^ i Y 1,.. y Y. Q N ■■` 7 3 if nLi 3 Y � w QLS rY �' Ci �YV .. l,> iwa K M W; w ` G c \�j G /77 _ }.� W 1 t— 4 C�r Yr= -Nb0�C R�.wR qg gy Hit IIIN s �GYG �L: i3 R u O Y a y'+z P- fitaui sp w YU hi y�Cf.np. `Mr� a� cggq�s .:A .mil ft; (•y +y}y�'iS iv-7t o �n1 u M _ $j ~'�r' c■`ur =SSu� pd wuy d p.:y d� ➢i Y. u iii M.�yg �8 � +lr w $.L �N �'LKy +yi ga�i �MM .�yi! Tgy�V� �.�r �� �w� �• �i_���;:y u a ps sgg c�ii F CI 6 76, all mg g l I !I a.o Y V3 i n „U� g g gam" 4 + 11 yVp4�y w 21 •f Y +� 11P its 1 A; g jb 9Ilk H a yy^^ GN C G.Z- � M Gg igN bgYN am . "u rub y gsiaji ri•Dq. CN3�, •'� d Rp., O NY g �bi! X d v s C ty��{iy�I L 7 p ■, 4Di 't�- tee 'c`o'`F''4�'•� Val tax= z M' Vx azzRa- P� � s,G ,iijg4�,�y6 a � f+ #. r� � !• Q. Fit VP O �» Y� I.Y '� �! E 2%� p0 IQ 3 Hal; I e a r ' ar .. <a aa. � t. �..-_ Hal; 1 ice, � b$$s .y j u'..3 s'S Sip $,. �v', ,'i'` ''5 -� +.' +g .. BSI;. , + rr ww rS yy�, p� an e.i Jr� �� �. ^' MM�� LOLN i' 629 � �j`l �+ _ � will .9K Y i+ . -Aer «R° g .K a] 1444 7 fw oilY 3Y 11 a- 4 �t d�.a3 r s i! go. `L4M6 .�Mt {wA - a *F��uu � 0.!! ■+]'^a; Gi��R ' Y4wY so N ^ 7 Imo` ��� HpA wM. aid. �O �.:0 L ¢ 9- q,9 NO -5 s3 its, to [:1 ; � �� �a ����� _sUgE is-?o VC�C�l1 01.yy)- 0 :�5,s Oa �( R4. R 4i�,PM M+Sri �pt.yL RM QyM dfl.. 4�y} wliA 4 ac M w 6 > N ` Ti A Np w Tf VT 313Z H y �w j1Yw p Fir, sad M Y� *I$ - r ill"', t u as w «�:'. •' Mw' •+'i1 rvi �i _ ✓�O Hl 1i�V M'..•�6.1 $ !� r'{i.Y �iC i•M Zl u- N O. V M Y �. t �.N W ■p �Y � Oi$) .vat a{q Ll n r.. w i as ss By e . ^ «M Y p .� •qq- Is e�iL AO4:s ' •A. �' 'O�. Lta+ �aNi�. �,, { ��� `�� w�. itcy Ai•� M is $'� � •� 'L3 g�� wN �M �aN I awi ski Y� �4 N L•qi� p�(/_� �i1 Ly�A �'{Mr Y{.4��, 1 x.» ;y� {4C ■■� gg q � «�j�YY yue N G:7 ti K Tf. WI L �tC �: /:ywy 4`,1�l,¢iY i.J q y. GqA K4 y . MyN yY tic wlYOt S � V .T s Omni, R� 1zf ~t4 C6 a �, Ask I n j I " Y o Aw tit 74 24 log 9 p - . its V - " $�lv `�¢ s7 ice. r tail, ' �' Pwi Fero- r�i Yom._ ~� a •moo xi � >Vf ",� MO re Ai vc YT Nei`. Z 6M�3.Y w.. �4 %M Q�.�[ y✓;1 a th ar3 +R•'�• �C 9fif' n � ✓. �' L i a..aai. <Ita. b n CrTy OF RMCHO CUCAMOINGA FREPORT a FBATE- March 23, I9B8 Chairman and *go,,rs of the Planning Comission Bra"I Buller,; City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, �ssociate`Planner SUBJECT. UNIFOW STAA Plto FCR iBRPA VISTA VILLAW SHOPPING 40 the nor �.'3' c:orner c nCt . oad aC: "ai6 Aim* Q Pflnig� I. ABSTCi CORpi ssion directed ., staff to <, haave ` the fission r1eviet shopping center Uniform Sign 6' r#=., t TI. ANALY IS: The proposed sign progrm coatai s ika .following sign . cria€^saz A. Ma or Tenants: .Hughes FAC,41and Longs Drugs are designated as , i or enan s subject to the followjog sign criteria. --,4., i. Large letter - height: Long's Drugs - 3 feet Hughes Iarket - 6 -felt (Exhibit "V ") 2= Color: red with gold tri3s lr 3. Larger, sign area: �� 1 Long's Drugs - 135 square feet :� 1 Hughes >iartet - 127 square feet � 4. Monument signs allowed. 8. Style; ho uniforms style minor Tenants. FO-- 811 tenants other than Long's Drugs or y es r the fmllowin9 sign criteria2would apply: . 1. Letter height (INhibit "D "): a. Naximum 24 'finches, (Exhibit "A ") b. Viximui1 18 inches if adjoining;.Sase Line ar Haven' - , o ibit -A,t� PLANNING Ct9helIsSlDMi SUM- REPORT E ARE: UdIFCFX SIGN P R#� FOR TV CTR. = Burch- 23„= F -1S8$ ° Page 2 4� r, 2. Wort red with gal trier J 3, Sign 'c+nIth: j limited tons of lease: storefront =- (Exhibit D ") 4. S ►1e!: gib urtifor style (tenants choice) C. ManumeM fns: t M's a lent sign (Exhibit "F ") is proposed on TM n!e a rW4,0M at the entrance drive�ays, Staff will work wfth the sign company and the Erojineeri >4q, Dlvision� to ensure that their locations maintain adequatein* -of-sight visibilfty: The above proposed criteria In areas of, sign area, letter F� ��ght with flexibility for tenants to choasz their letts� style,`'4,dteId achieve a significant visual ral,ttionship between th tpn and the buildigs. Therefore, staff determined that propos � gn ptogrn meets the intent',jf the Sigr Ordfnenca. III. REC"ENDATIONt $ '�° :o ends that a i�ianning C e scion direct 3 alma app ve rise Ursi#a a sign Program through ao ute action. Res ull), s City Plan er v M.NFako ,Attacfmaeetts; %/Exhibit "K" S P Exhibit *311 -log's Drugs Wall Sign Exhibit "C" < Hughes Market Walt Sign Exhibit "D" - Minor Cenant hall Signs r Exhibit "t" Kfnor Tenant-Val 1, Signs Exhibit "" Monument S%gn Elevation Exhibit "G" - Complete S%rt Progr�a —�-r- ��j � Sti3Yfd0'lHR3d 311 � � :ti[� r , .�J +rNOms•oanohw,>feae « annt It.•ts ae �$ 7! $.• i6VTMv am i1ou ii klw ;f l SIM •' YY SCy.' IZ + ..{'{4. 4LIt t� • i •�; Y l� IM 0. Mv- Pi oil �, ' t 1 , •rya ' • ij(11 t 1- .. a e ,� . �� ; � r�a , X3."'r.' _a ...i • �r t t ( i dlsWw.j...`. \a\ LVM• 4 jjy��(�;_ t'. S� -t � ; =.jt" t , r a ter,,.• i t'l \: , � _�_., , ��,r., � e'1♦ t� � � t ......... LU tit ` t }• l` 4 pill, tit1".111 c 1 ' s 11 jj it Y. t i t �3 ;sasi:,r a r wets :t►sc.r a :i ro Qg x � -J5 f `, Y I (, '� J - \ �� �� � � - ��� �� . �� �{ � � ����� `�� ���� 3 � ,.�� s t -�-- -. ...,; t �,� i i � r .�� ' �,/� y �. � �r o. � � � �.� `. ,' �� �i t "�``� � ae•. �, �: F 4 � ,. �,�\ 1 ;..:� , "� �� `tiw�. ,. J=am`, `,} �� .. �� k •� ' h �_� -, _ � = r D-7 ki 1R11�. li MOO W' 'Lu tu PAI G � f i LU ui -- IT �LLJ(j� - LU. Nt V) A74 --- C' i L O cr Now AWW lM'g1lt OK?r1, `..fit. IX -- MM � ;� tom' .. Ai_'� �$ ��:-- ��J`-- •-..+r � �� � * <�- =-..'� . - 'C�y"i+lYS�5T.6iDF9J1'e91�Jrl�� , _ ., r ,- �•'� - .'� au*7 jw e� -, �vx 5 di e All'l l R � � c n j� ton tjr+ Ai 17 `, olo a • S I to H C" R I "" * s RR I TERRA VISTA �`��i THE:- PL3 OS9 OF THIS SIGN CRTTER A. IS TO V-STABLI,SO THE LION STANDPADS MESSARY'TID ENSUitE C�1t0 DIiNATED PRQPjtOT;roKp*L EAPoa[ m FOR AM THE Ii'ENA gs. PFRYt� �E ��iiliaL" EE STRICT'O. ENFORCED "A1l D ANY It4^s'i°AuLs�il " a'gNFIitMING � DNS S 89 MOVED BY INNOVATIVE f,'�►Pij3 S, INCORPORATED, TETk. SIGN CIA''RACTOit,AT TiE, TStTi44i2'�:s ,a?; SR. DICRER W 7GTUN PROPtRTIE:S, IN COORDINATION, ITS T2lI4WATED G".Pf ,--Ss ZNCORBO$ATEil,* US DLVSr IIZD Tag Foi? 'i.mt'i1G SIGN :r =12(ARRIA. WHXCH ALLOWS :ahCH `TENANT Rc"4 FOR CREATIVITY WITS IN L`:liITS OF` ,'!REIR LEASEHOLD. A. GENERAL ARQUIR:T MENTS: I. ALL SIGNS AND 'CHE;IR, IPRSTALLATIOR MUST Ct>WLY WlTB Az�, L .AL UILtll*G AND MZC!%!kTc L OWES. 2.. No 1lr IMATE 17, '. BIfiiCa OR ALt1DY8L+E SxGtts Oi'TiLL BE PERMITTED. INO Emp6SED LMPq, RACEWAYS, CROSSOVERS. C ttY ",£S, � CONDUCTOR$, 'I'PxWSPORKERS, 0'a �&Ny S1141L.AR <1D,LvxCE " 7 "sBALY RE L'Ettlwllmm. 4- 16 TENANTS MUST RAVE T-WS!f-AlAZD'vxioR TO OPENING FOR PUSTa%iESS AEiG AllAxYQTIkIYd Tag FOLLOWING ^,sits ¢S- A. INDIVIDUAL METAL lC ANNEi i �A $ WITH P,=:GL4S F LACES, l7w Ek XOP .tLLtxtATEb . B',.=,` AN UNDERCFXOPY 3S- AMBLAS`I°EDWOOD`S3['GN, EXCEPT IN AREAS' WH9P —&'' TB1 SOFFITT' WILL H7T ACCORRODATE A C. THREk 7NC:H NIGH STORE ADDRESS NUMBERS P':, ^ii7 -SE PATNtED ON THE PLASTER A►?�t'iV i� A MOORS.. NUMBER STYLE TO IRE HOOY•E4P,W. O"%O R TO BE DAR.R, SR-o . i. D. STORE ADDRESS NUMBERS OR LETTERS M1ARE'TC $E � �r THREE INCUES SIGH AND SANDBLAST3D ON A � WO3OD FLATS. LLT�Yt'i:R OR 2itlR4BEtt PLh3'£ Tf) BE INSTALLED OVER ENTRY ANn ATTACHED TO t " :EXISTING STORE PFEElNT WOOD TRIM. SIZED COLORS O3F WOOD LPL :2 I{ Z AS 'SHOWN ON DES%�tT` SIGN CRITERIA 5. Upon RA3 AOVVAL Old' AAY STGk BY THE Txti' ,. MAY DAMAf ,a TOE SPILDI NS P'Abt'�IF>}, i5R SxG�7 A� BE # IA!l7Rf' 7 £ "'1`�i.�' '1°Htii M'i, Oit :Laf THE E 1lZ1FJ1,40% THE ZXPS"Sr- UPAIR WQRE ' W SE y ETA w TH ;,V" A TAB oAY purl€ — 6. XXCIOPT' AS PROVXDbp IiEREtN, No �xSING cr►af'Q. HAl, , Per ASS T = INSI f 1aA r 7tRXA1 S, iIR% it 'R Ti Cam" aPTILiE !4!!' A5RIA2, A " (is ArrxY f R Ii+AT.�lx; 1UrPillyt „�Ae1Y Aa�Te���EO P�si�iiNlr, GLAS �H f jF THE BUI I*4 14ANDSCAPS ;A MSr A'2RpzT,,S ZY Aki , PRorwii€S FOR APPROVAL AVFORE L gr'8MCATlrOX, YOUR L"'taplES or DETAIL Dltk"X iGS jUjDxCvT LOU.MON, SIZV, ; lAYOAlT, DI.SIGN AIM C WR OF PRXPOSED �'-IGN, IN CUMING 44A,,2, TIFF LZTTER iV�%�p,�i?� LOGO. Pw 40,R TO STWTTxwQ ' TES CITY Or; , CUCMCWGA FOR RJWlk 7 M 212 AMOVAL. a. A%L PA IT'O�.FOR SWUS -AIM ?BUR XN's"'i'I4.�= :r1�°xl�� i i4T,L BE €}BTAYtMA -13Y THE TE;EPIAiA`Jl' OR SnAL10 BE RESPMsI o FAQ a WING ITS SIG" "WING Tb 1WE ,A. PRQPMTE C � CY' FE)R APPROVAL. � _. /} E� T}iE itEQUi flTS AXI) SVECIF'ZCA�b3�5 Ste'' . PORT'i3' 1A4 THESE GE��,Ai. ,,Y23�QC3TRr�fE1R`I'S S ti= 0 r S Wd Gtt CRITERIA f °t'ERRh VISTA VILLAGE PAGE 3 SPECI�CATZONS Fog TE "AA1TS SIGN IAiDIVIAk]AL TLLtiTNXD CEI,,.�� o INDIVIDUAL ILT,UMINATtb IETxEFFIV E ($ I S WILL SE : A PjW CHANNEL METAL I►EEP ;�,E! TZR FACES WILL BE OF YtoBM A�7D PL?XICLA;S WITS A 3/4,. Ncjj TRINCAP MOLDING FOR v" SECT MI �+ TE;E PLEXTtx� s DER' FACE TO THE METAL L . TLT.TMI Ri'"IOAI OF T", LZTTZRS ,VlLL BE WITR NEON �*G l OUN Rxy z C ,.J tiliTO 'f�SE 1�tYTL`a,�.:a:.T 7 �$F„gA, , T� N:k �' ZlAt�'M%t,�T�;�,+ ARE ACCOl1M,)DATE THE "litING AND il�I8 7F�QLIIRE FOR I ,LjFlINA,�PTNG CHANNEL LETTE 1►`� °" ' INSIDE OF ItE BUILDING. FASCIA. 13E MOLiNd1`ED A. L `TER STYLE OR LOW RESTRICTIONS. " lei: im AND MI.4oR TENAWS MA'1 HAVE A tzr S"R3CLl'. or r THEIR CHOICE. *1a MAY EE Romm, VARS OR ItEG"1'ANGLE PROVIDED T'HEl' , DO NO'1' 3�7C OF THE IES16 m SIGN APYA, B. LETTER REIGHT RESTRICTIONS (MAJOR I% tlA3 ©a TENAN'l`,0 SUCH AS LONGS, DRUGS OR S Kmumr WILL BE AJ toNM A SIGN AAA 4ioT TO E7�CEED 150 ', SQTJAitE FEM. ' Lvmza ml� ETS MAY Noi EXCEED SI]C pEET' ( 6 ° OftRALI . LETTER`REIGUT RESTRICTIONS (MINOR TENANTS ), MINOR TENANTS rjILL BE ALLOWFj) ONE(,) LIME ft� COPY s ^ NOT To EXCE ED 2410 XN,HEIGH OR TO EXCEED ' IN BRIGHT. MINOg TENANTS�WITH BUILDINGS ADJACENT TO AND FACING BASELINE ROAD OR HAVEN AVP1kiiJE WILL ONLY BE ,ALA M"M, ONE d 1 Y LINE COPY W }TH EfES NOT To EXCEED 1 " IN SLIGHT OR TWO (2 )• LXjjES�jS�F COP ' NOT TO EXCl�ED '1$* IN HEIGHT. D. LLTIF.R AND LOGO COLOR RES'TLZIC',TIONS MAJO�i'kiltop. TE1'MTS ' a „ 1. ALL TENANT INDTVIDt3AL iLLUMTNATrO IMUNE.L LE'T'TERS SHALL BE PAINTED WHIVE IF_1. IDE: AWD DPjtX k}� ZE IiI3 ON `a:ZE OUTSIDE SURFACE OP THE LMTE�S. it 2. ALL CHANNEL LETTER PLEXYGLAS FACRS SR.ALL DBE Off' � ° o 11@E" (1') COLOR #2 ?93, REDa WITH A 3/4" G"D :"RIMCAP. ;l cr �j �� �A121 e SION CRXfik` iliv TEft M VII YI+.JAG f yyf�4f g�a � ., LETTER ADM Lt 'CQLlD$t IMSTAIC3'IONS Coln,.- o- 3 • x.gGo rACE COLOR$ Nhy VARY, PROVXD CVW; IS _ 21,i 10EEiPX TRE !TS ESlrAB#,ISBRO M'TWA, t tSG{? Ct�LC 1tS S�(�:�L- ZZ MI-0 OT IDXC XrX = WARMZNS�'". OR 1428 AaWT r'aR �ROVA4. L. THE SSE SPACE AT' THE Mw OF THR sviwl lw; xhy tit: AI,7LA ED "fO WALL SIMS, on Cw $A4* Eiflwl(ma PAtt.` j! TUAlt T'.SRII SIONS_A i x x.�x+�x Or Am,, . -�, l4 14 n'•WliT $I+C S -11 , VLOMW To 14t�Ys. on* BUSINESS N+tESa C WI'�ZIN THIS BStiPPgge, ^SaO SVXWXW ADDRSSS NaMBE 4SY il�PBR# Ba2Lti 14 :& ' k -'qQMBgRS an f 0 BE `p%jWM Vise BROWN Old SVILI?INQ I''ACt .-IWD- TO BE LC ,M IN `A ta� .., ARC,. AS R.t�S ul"D BY ;t;I IRB D' ZpAt�;TBNTSw NUMBERS awbou s STYLE. UNDERCCANOPY SAftStASTZO VOW SZ( S S`R14 �L EE x2 ZN 'ES i I%'1 BEiGBx' 0OU9 C4S' PEET IN Lrafm HAXVHVM,. $At -� GRotmD TO ZE stATHED OLYMPIC �9$� COPY L *RS TO BE „ 42793 RED WITH A I /8° -INSET BO)WEiR VAIN $2i46, IVORY j a> F'G7304 0;«.02f19 }R8 NU/176E <�,�� �ro.��� ��T�es o,� �vt✓i�i` -fie woG��°L��� �� wooc wig a%l�vG'7�_.dsjE.0 �-�lT• G��t/L/.L1.�r�� •�� ,�,y�o cam- /.v��- �. win ��.�� ,eace .c�tir ouT 1/2 A..4GS,r� 6.4� ✓0�,- �GG,��7� 5T4�g; va2yy t�rr i� eZ-(- AV -3o ZZ,- 421 � rr LF�� ✓ /�G G.�J� r� d �S P/1 Ai i 0 �jx;...v,� �GY.�i'.�"�% "y`�j¢' • G"r..C'Y C.c�'iar� ,7� �.cS+�Gh' Wi'✓.� G�i�i��' � O.iS.',.*jtiJ'�• /�,6 � • q� l?/,c- ,G$�,r0��' �B )'C / /�g ",�iti".�.�lc' ' 4!l rzlp1- l* e �d 4`I �c L e b-dom, Appan6dv E� /`, 'CUPAESI e �d 4`I �c L e i ,�+ t i i ld h. iJ y J c;" Af l p. F. �l t � P r Nit i 4t �p 5 ' J `r l 4 > 31 4 J� u..a ' ��1� uj. i '`tom Lu 1 .._�. lo_ CE a. y cr Ll �� � F - ( •� J 9 s t� J Vi a. q ''; ' Ax j j t� ,• _ TF t r�m -- .� ewaaiso�eew.oNx�a hmd ,`.I.ia .- �Itvr#ii yssw 411 A 4 f i7 , I�A • ii( jij� �t s S 1 e •�__�-- .+.yr.' a aA 1 i r ` �.. as • ; •` /, t / ;y �•• • ; � t`�i/'e '•+��i R..� " - �{> %!`�k/ fji r !h"i 11 � m-S: • �" �i '• F r � t i i ix •��— aN < +tt �i� \ A .,e }''` fpY �.��, ��? t Q.�� �� �' r ( � • j 1 i t}'bV -r . q i 3�f�� l .,vi,� � j j � a� i • �t �i e mss-. —s' �•• 1 t r. � aa'ii y✓�. I i r1a a • ........ .. r fi (i�. cee'e['s °i.:sursa.. ..'s. ...`�" ..Ck✓^°.�_ t � •{ �+ I r t+� � � ,� r{ Fti � 4 }� �g��� r fi. d i �' � r lily lit S q�.� �^t� t I.N. "a i ji !�N. D ,t aZ S I T t, i i, , i l Elise a r t5 � i.' H ♦ : f ,'I k z,� �. ##� t L4t.7 {r{n3,ri : iell;QF3 �011 .eki��J "rrljµt�ii &b�tLC�S�•:1�. ( S • C J (" �+rti I I 1 � a• r. • . � a ;.':� �i 6_. •4 %C�Mb R akll tw.t.e- i'xk�.! ,� ,� I 11 } � c , IV ��� " Otis. '�� •e '� � t� � � • t { �. � � r � +�. � � : �� � �r _ S y. t 71 r y�! . (a ' �n ��� •"i ,,,. "" -a i Os All it L a Pty �"- � �x 1�- i Y i t i i �g 1:.�� ol Aw 1p ib g t�Y 7 �• � +fps�s 1l1� ��.� � ate �. LLT t f . � zi ve o. „ March 16 1988 L ats;sf P3anna( . City Planning ComMkWon j Ci)t of Rancho Cuca notiga < P. tit: BOX, 807, Rarx ho Cucamonga, cA 9t'3(t I l RE: Trad No. 118 68/Srimar�iocrprneatt npany Deer 9fis. Nissen l r' Because wo are sure that the City 0% the City Planning Commisabn shave our vie stro?�gl -held belief that the rigl s ,.lf CUM r�i�ens cannot be er41lated .by arty new rreertt, we hereby kio= -you of the i;�cts Wow end deman&-�nat c!wnges in the ZoMing perm ire the mat. which will maint$I t the p�? rty vas and safety of current` ree'dehtta. A Property ltaluemov, Nsve t It homes owing planned for lots 77 - I on the North side of Almond Street, partt,,Ylary on lots 78, 80, 81 and are Mitt, the cornkk,iatiort of #Wr Pjennsd- helQha`,r9f the foundations and the ptartned height of the two -story haanis, will cause firm_ to tow -7,ver me extstirtg+i)r?mes b to ii thq youth of them` and totally plc the view the exis* hoittes h&nr of the cart r`,atx!et MWOentains lu he North. Seca Eso of the grade on, which they are buiit, the foundations of tha existing'twaoen to ft -South are 5 approximalWy three to five feet taekiw the street level, T. blccksgu'of the vi yr of the _ San Gabriel Mountains, of caotm. seve`iety cieeraasses the OW otliving to the horres Soa%h of kmor j and CS mase mf r He worth. , c To prevent the bleieiced view deS1* ri above, we demand that the pianned fourtri$tw,i heights of the new homes North of Almond be lowered and that in4 proposed twd -story homes there be changed to one -wry homes, i B Dfveway SafaV issue Tile st WiWay5 of lots 81 and 82 note being developed are so aloft fo each other aw to the driveway, 'of the existing home across the street that a tight triangle of trafflt:. which is " unsafe lo created. t'-Vs probierrt is eaQj remedied by moving the drive lay of lot 82 farther East to the other. side of-be street light where there it ttlready.�ttansiae curt area that could bs used for r3Neway eas. { � 2 5 At Respectfully, %e _fir f`• �` lJ f- •f, �_. Current Almond Street R'esidenis �Iz IV- to III , •f� .,1, �l i=/ �,� 7 i4� n++'41��3 F i „,` M 1 L., 1� Z� 0 ng r 1 , 4 r o r t - t ° t..- , i 0701 -02 c, 3-23-88 PC Agenda 6 of 6 CTZ'Y QF RANCHO CUC.AMON(Y,4 STAFT EP OR DATE: Mard 23, 2988 % ' 0 TO; Chaili an and4mbers cif the plan nya r;onmission rag FROM. Brad e�ller, City Planner s BY: Bruce `tCook, Usociate;'PTapne i SUBv CT: REYYSED11 DEYELDPMENT AGREE ENT BYa M For a senior housing C P ro. ee ,:,on e' sw,a �„�iia c_" «se,no Road, wept of Archibald Avenge. •i j I. BACKGROUND: 4rl March l,AEB, staff met with the develdpet� t €.e sen or ousingl project, to discaajs ,.the te",Is of, the pre used Development Agg eemer� fora tfre ;aenior housing project. ,.At that meetings staff 15:ia the developer Mutually agroed to car in revisions in th1, jovolop lent Agreement document, Viese cha tgt's were incorporated into the documnt and sent out for . typ,k;q. However, at the �%,i,,nr of the p1asi1ai:1g Commission packet distrikqtJon fcr the agenda' of 23 �' € . ',his goat recent, versioat dl��,jje Developineht P r�eenent had not , 'hen cws letedd -ince that time the final ++/rsicn �xs rece;:s nd� a. statf,'has been completed nttd ie � now avaiTa�lc for the Coa i�sie�'� s�� :aiderationa Attache is t € :e rc-cor �nda finz', version of the Beveloi'!ent Agreeir4nt. t'Teaer ;cote the � M8' ara�,t the doc!mse:ai iracitade�i iti your•aganda packet a �"ollows 2. 'fhe tem-s ox ..4VQcr 00 hove boeil changed from a 30 to a 20 year �terioO (ice paragra h I -C, Page 2 and Paragraph a B Pak ) s ga s been ir.nde to make this Dee veTo,rizvo t Ai,rec aat consi tAilt w1th the Tergth of tent as approved for i act io "Sting senior hne9sa.n projects, i.e. Ffa =tviia4o ApartilantY; on Archibald, Okh Of Bane Line,, atr&tilc— p,,ua101pi't gieat, Ickson Apart ?r on t thyst, north 'Of 19th St, °,det. 2. Tire low incorue rt ?ntal Millirf:mgnt has been changed fra:T. <; 1DD Wce:tt Participation to -90 percent of the rental j units being res,wvod for raMdents of low income (Paragraph D, Page D). RIth the tWo previous senior / housing projects, the Cher;+ offered direct firraaciaT contributions in teats ois fee " 'Oeda�cMons ,and feo waivers. No fm waiver or reduculi ons aro being , proposed as a parer of Als c €argent prajcct. As a '. result, the d6veloper has rp�gi=estod, 4r?d staff is recoat�taeirdi,ra,�.�,�yyat mire r °s n n'i a+ s ricti a be gpplled to Only CO Per nt OF the Units as a unans tO wake this project more edoa ya,,1i64l T y tenable, i teM3,CbEFG I �t EPOU R WISED OF Page : far lhV t t 'J eoi given �� lenders to respond to various �� Yas bey increased from, 30 to 60 days (see � Para �: ^end, Pages lid 1.2). Brij change u Sri in p `inaf -,Z n fat enders WgUld . g fer i aes for eve c M, under afi' athci pra�ect• Ma,t menders � e 4w, Pro to mule a dec `i± , tequi�e4=,af °these psragt<apits withhin the da, tirrc �i''Me ��5 =7n ortiinall y gi ethei e ,and mould, , tice unacceptable,; gth tf ti tenders ar vend:iot to , 0 y make, < e nrs : wou• find these tees f urg 11 sic ? �J reble and would be wil to pnrticionte Y4�1 ;�' �•.p%'EdJetiy aTWte c,d.,,ove lopee, ,1 rbp�p clanged ftq lest End 15me,J CUi s7 L�°': }y�il =?tC�l`,10 pent to made with blest i�t�tit �dt-S t —� Jferrin eir �' g its and interests �. 3�. p t f€A :5e 00merk,f5te Pages 12 and r \ 4,YMMI aTroliy Staff ,vt� at the planning cOi1R1ti55itln' �orYer� a�e"v�°e rei�in f `?� b staff and.. adept Cite Resoltjtjeea rnUmMmd'ynq to � �' City. staff that they approve Qei"e1mk3 of g�ti ?t -02 . a ,.QAIR Vita changes to the document as oa,:� nisi "�:�x�« City Pi no, � v \o , f J- DxnZ4MXT AOREXMXT W. -87-02 -- 8��1��lkt Ci'�'$:dHAtBTi �iSl17g'i�Tt3 THIS A(?-TR fF.�+XT is entered into as of the 'rEffeativia Date" set foreA &ore n by and between VETER' W. XQVR'OJl�, dbm NO URSE _? DMLOPHSHT c e ao al s gropriotors'hip ( "Davel.operf ") - and the CITY OF RMCKO C'UrCANOXGh, a municipal s orporation ,organized and existing urndev the laws of the state of Californi& ';( "City"). A. Raitals. (i) Qallfornia Coverreent Ccide Sections 65864 at segg authorizes cities to eater into binding deavelopment agreements with peroons having legal or equitable intereste in real property j for the development of such property. 1 (ii) Califoimia Government Cade Section 65815 prcr ✓ides that a city may, by agreezeAt with a developer, grant a density bonus over that allowed by the maximum density established irc -:the development code and lands use element of the gener4i.1 plan wh 1 en a developer agrees to `" sfkruct hopsir g -'or low income senior r households, 1+ i ! f (iii) Developer owns all interest in and to that real property loac Lted entirely within City k the comp on and legal' description .of which is set fog tlh . in exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated herein -by this r ferc!nc'e and thereinafter is referred to as f°the, Site." (iv) The Site is now zoned high Residential 414,ith, a Senior Housing iverlay District pursuant to the provisions of City's Development Cods, as amended to'`date hereof. Developiar and City desire to provide through this Development Agreement more specific development controls on the Site which will provide k for maximum efficient Utili, Ation. of the Site in_accorclance with sound planning principles. iw (v) The Developer propcAes to constxiicic a senior ° C. 'housing residential project, including low income'units, within ' the City. Said project contemplatsd by Developer will require are increase in the maximum density as currently provided i_n,the senior Housing Oveelay Distract. (vi) It is the .desire of City to encourage dsvelopmentV designed to provide affordable rental units ftiv senior residents.,. C of the City. In furtherance of that +wire, the City is hereby willing to grant a density bonus.to.Developer as providwi by.the ' terms of this Agreement, l .a l a, (vii.) 1989, City adopted its, OrdLiarce No. if, ; therebT piroving this Development Agreement with - 1}evel6per and said action war effective oil 'ISM. J MOWa TiMREFORS, the pies hereto agree as fo1'kvawr 1. ef_init�` . Xn this .Agreement, rmiass the content otherwise requires, the following texas shLll; have the fol:�6wlnq meaning: a. y is the City of Rancho Cucamonga. h. "project* is the d6vaimpaent apprarad by Ci#*y compri.aed of one hundred seventy (170) apartment unite. 1 recreational -end comm04 ar-a fa gilities, one huriared seventy W70) parXing spai;; an other a aaonitles on the Site, all as set ford more fully in -'W T\1* plan for !4 - Valopment R€view 87-•33 43f _ tted by nevelo at and approved by,City, a copy *doh is attachad heretor, mar)...... ed as Exhibit rS and Ij-s ixtcorpt�rated herein by thit:reference. The site ? 1 an attachod as Exhibit nSu J includles various condition ' of approval which siie riot ? changed, alteredolor mcdifi� 6 by �thia Dpvo),c,pmsnt Agreement r less a�cif cr �y sot fortk{; hiirein. the project Also ir,�q iidas the records of the applications by Developer, the proceedings before the Planning,; j commission and City Counnil r3f City on file with t xe 1 City f' and all such records aiJ ,as in these matters' i � are ncorporated herein by this reference as though.s�et forth in full >f`l C. t°Qualified Prof _t% Period" ) weans the first clay an which thfe residentt'd units ir, the development are first a 0lable fox pccixpano°y by QuFSlified Tenants and , continuing fc;r twenty (2a) years. d d. Q7Qualte,ted Tenants* shall mean persons ti- who are at least fifty -five (55) years or Oilier and are senior citizens as definzd in Section 51 «3 of the 1 California Civil Code as said sections are written as Of the effective ilate of this Agreement. "no'O i noome L,4z; Ii fie:d Tenants', .shall , can Qualified Tenants: who alad possess an income equal to or less than eighty pendant (M) of the current County of San Bernardino median income as determined by the Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development,a' ` pursuant to S®Ction s of the united States Housing Act C`r 1?; _ 2 f of 1937. - - -Tn the event such federal determinations o€ area median income are discontinued, other means.to determine the median inc:onal, as determined by the city, ohall be established for Rancho Mcamongta, or Rancho cvcamonga0a geographic area, at eighty percent (80 %) of the area med;L n income, adjusted,,-tor family size and revised annually. P MIA fft�rdable Rents" shall mean those rents charged to Los :incowtt Qualified Tenants, which rent shall be on an annualized basis aqua,--to or lose than'thirty purcout (30 %) of the eighty percent (soy) of the +current median income as establ�.sbed for suck qualified Tenants. For purposes of thi#)" definition, rents charged for-411 one (1) bedroom units shall be subjeot.to comp'utatiok,based on eighty pexcernt (80 %) of the median i=omo fora two (2) parson household. Rents charged for all two (2) bedroom;,units shall„ be subject to computation based upon eighty percent (80%) of the median income for all househc_*i' dg ifor four (4) or more persons. f. "Effective Data" shall mean the 31st calendar day following adoption ofi the ordinanc- a-approving this Agreement by City's Cfty,)Councilw: 2. Recitals. The recitals are part of the agreementbektc_en the parties and • shall be enforced and eanforcble as any , of -.er provision of this Agreement. I' 3. Int2=51 of promerty a Developer werrants and I represents that it has full legal title to the real property, that it has full legal right to enter into this Agreement and that the persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Developer have been duly authorized to do so. aF Bind"Z RUA= = Agraement. The Developer hereby subjects the development and the land described in Exhibit "A" hereto to the covenants, reservations and restrictions as met forth in this Agreement. The City and the Degolopeb• hereby declare their specific intent that the coveniints, reservations and restrictions,... as set forth herein shall, be deemed covenants running with the land and shall pass;to and be binding upon the Developers, successors and assigns in to ^a le or interest to the Develo'ciant. . Each and every contract, deed or other instriment hereinafter executed, covering or conveying the development or any portion thereof shall conclusively be held: to have been executed,, delivered and accepted so -ject to the covenants, reservations and restrictions expressed in this Agreement, regirdl.ess of whether such covenants, reservations and restrictions' are set forth in such contract, deed or other instrument, 3 r City and Developer hereby declare their `� ders�anding and intent that the burdan of the covenants, resale tions Lard restrictions set forth,hareixi touch and concern the Rand �,{l that t:ir. - sleveloper0s legal interest iA ,the development sF`, rendored less valuable. thereby.,: The Citf and Developer her � y. further declare their usaderstai ding an intent that the ber`tbfi:t .cif such covenants touch and concern thsw�.- send by. enhancing Mid increasing the +arijoyment anad use 4, the DevaeV ert by Qualified Zmants, the intended ban* eaficia �,ses of such covenants, rexeiiratioMs and. r ,� restriction., an by. furthering the public: purpossspts for V; ich_' this Agreement is adopted. Further, the part ess iai'eto pores that such covena xte,, repervations and 3 �aestriswtios4 Is renefit all other read property loco tad in the CitY' of Itanehoi C3icamonga. 5. RelationfihiRA RWtJ4J,-. It is understood that the contractual relationArAilf bxatwedel City zinc Developer,;is such that Developer is an indeapand.ent partg and is<,�ot the agtgt of city for any purpose wha i aV;er and shall not be, cons dez&,T, to- be th,% agent of city for any 'purpose whaztq"ver. si. T= 2Z AQreement. The term of the Agreement #h' ,*11 comrenca, on the effective daate air? shall expire tventy (20) yei,1rat t%fter the commencement of then. ,'-al fled project period, so long as Developer remains in mat ial complIanci with thin AgOement, as J from time to t de a menddO . Capon the conclusion of the *alif ied 'Project Periget and the epapirxation of this Agreement as °pz€ +•idled herein, the �Praject .shall' bt Made to conform with all t81,1011. sp; )lice ble velupment Code pr ovissFions. This �,graoment sb\ai r be deemed to b , terminated autom#,ttic3lly if Developer does. not, , obtain a Cet tificate f Occupatncy , for, the sntiroty of tre pzoj�� jt within three '�) yea3' y of the effective date, 7 • Restri-Q .g� SM Rental AL E* All tenants, Occupants, and residents of apartment units in the 'Project shall be Qualified Tenants. Said -�%t„44rtment units shall not, be rented, occupied., leased. or suWNamed to Occupants who are zaot Qualified Tdy larsta except as pr €prided as follows.* a. A 1:, �6on or person who is not A Qualified �COnaatt, and is a t least forty -five (45) years of age, may occupy an f artment unit if be or �� shs occupies an apartment uni '\ with a present ooi;upant who is a Qualified econo�tia' s�uTp, noaxnt t nd physical or o ar to suQ8�,lified Tennant; b. A person at leant forty -five (45) years., of age who `ix the Spouse of a Qualified Tenant may occupy a unit with such Qualified Tenant; and = c> _ I' 4 I _ c. A person or persons under fifty -five (55t years of age mad occupy apartment units as'temporary tenants for a ti Period of time not to exceed three (3) months during any calendar Year, 8. ION TnM2 EMItal g cuirements. During the Qualifiad .Project Period fifty percent (50W) of the units in tide Project shall be rented, leased or held available for Taw Thncome t, Qualifies) Tenants at affordable rents, ' as defined t►erei ft. Additionally, at Least sixty {So) days prior to an)i increase in rental rates, as cory?uted by the terse of this Agreement., the Developer shall provide written notice of much ircaease. to the City and all affected tenants. 9. Maintenanas 21 Alamo nts aA R`w talc. Di ^ifiq, the term hereof, all apartment units in the Project shall remain rental units. No apartment unit in the Project shall be eligible for conversidn from rental units to condomin$.ums, townhouses or any other common interest subdivision withouv consent rat =the City Coancil . 10. on_._ s__�s Sinaffor, A .full -time manager shall be Movided on the Project $item 1 Tenant CoMitte•Q. Residafi6s shall have the right to F establish a committee composed Of ts:fants for the purpojik °of organizing social activities and providing commen'ti�,,and f suggestions- to the Developer regards:ng the opereI ioi and facilities of the 'Project. Nothing =in this 5e0:ian shall be deemed to restrict the.rights of individuals to organize �{ activities alld provides commermx to the Developer., -' 12. Submission gf Matftriala Mid An1lual ReyisX, Prior to occupancy, Developer shall submit to City tenant selection procedures which,-hall detail the methods which Developer shall use to advertise +.he avaViabilitr of apartments in the Project E and screening mechanisms khich Developer intends to use to limit the occupancy of the apartmert€€. to Qualified Tenants and Low f income Qualified Tenants. On or• before March 15 of each year following the commencement of the Qualified Project Period, the buvaiog ror - its representative, shall file a certificate.of continuing program compliance With the City. Each such report shall contain such information as City may require including, but not limited to, the followings a. Rent schedules then in effe t, including utility charges (if any) ; } b. A project occupancy profile„ inoluding'age,`resident profile and number of antox6tiless owned by Project c. A description of all written tomplaintsk,-received from a residents; d. A certification that low4taome requirements have been mete ' e. A list of substantial ttnyssical ilexe s in the Project, znq' uding ra description of repair or iaaInt* -.tmr� :yroik j °ndiertatken during trio reporting y paM t and' f. A a.�T,cription of the physical, condition ,and, ma utenanes , �1 proc' lurea for then Project„ including apartment, units, landscaping, walk4ayas andl . rsacreational areas. j city shall be allowed: to conduct physical inspections of the PrZect as it ssha1 deem n�ecs�scsary,; provided that said 3.respectionss do riot unre�sonai ay Uwterfera with the normal operation -i of t8 - Projeact and reasonable, notice is pr#"vidad,,_ The City $ball furtt�✓e,�r be allowed to conduct an ,anzuea :� survey of resiidents in tl7e Project in order to assseijs saniat nasdti. } 13. ==U � °4laot �n �'.ont==A s IV"& AAd Ret�0.a�hi�s'ng. on receipt. •of 1Yt application. for low income occu an - . p Cyr. i7ecreloper shall dete1mine the dligii•ility of the occupam.y under the terms. 'r of this r avelopment Agreement. V'erifioatJon of _tenant eligibizity, skull inolude one or more of th€e following factors: a. obtain an income verificat.i6n form from the Social Security Ad ministration and /or the California DePartm6nt Of seciaiJ'M,rVices, if the applicant a receives income frQS 4Y-4ther or ?ooth agencies } >. obtain an income tax return for the most recent tax :year, c. Conduct a TRW or similar financial ;ss!arckf, d, obtain an income ver�;fication from all ci1xrent employarr,; d nO, e• if the applicant is, ;nnsmployed and has no tar. � return, obtain anotts' Lorm of indepenciaAt verification. 6 Developer that l be antitlecl to rely art the info em a iart contained in the appljpatjon sworn to by the cpplicant.- All' ' agreements for I''e ptai of all 4�wartment units in the Project shall be in writing» (� The farm of proposed` rent,, or l , es,_rsgreement shall be ,reviewed and approvers by City prior to 64j mencpmant of the 'Qualified Project Period. Such , iucludu all rules and regulationEs governing tenancy within the-Project. The rules and regul ationn sbr;1_1, include regulatims which speoificAlly" authorize the keeping of omal.l pets within all apartment units,; 14. TerminAtimn QAd v anon '^enartts• 'A t*nancy may be terminated without the termination being deerw-d an evia -cion under tiH the fallowing Circumstancest - a. The death of the mule tenant of the unit;' b. B the tenant at the e By }tpi�zlfiC,3.+ai1, of or occupancy or -otherwise „upon thirty written noti qv . C. By abandonment of the premises by the tenant°t or' d_ By failure of .a tenant `¢c 4if to or renew a, lease} i Any termination of a ieiianry other, than those, listed above in this paragraph 14 asball, constitute an eviction. Developer - shall only evict in ,,nxpliance with the pravisior.Is of California law and then only Zz 'w�iterial r_bacompliance with tine, terZ s of the rental agreem;;,nt. Local Residangl. Ree. dency prefix enr_e shall be given where Possible to applicants t� the Frglect who have been residents of k, ttie pity' of Rancho Ct OWA15ugh However, that factor shall not be /liven priority over the other elements of Qualified,Tenant f Selection as stated herein.: J 18. stands§ A =4 Rest o onett'��'ini nu Sri l'he fcr*lowin- apecifio restrictionW R"hau apply to the use of the Site pursuant r:o this Development Agreement; a. only residential tses oZ the real property shall be permitted in the Project, ' j b. 'he maxim density of residential. Oral-ling units in ' the Project shall never be greater khan 35.05 j dwelling units per C. Thy zax$uium 4eig4t fat the highest proposed-building " in the'Proieot shall be Fifty -sfi�e (a3) d. The maxiaram size for all the buildings and the propoeed square footage for each of the apartment 'typal located in the Project shall be as set forth in Ekbibit "B" a tachod hereto; and ;; l e. The provisions for reservation 4:Aa�:p4� cf land for public purposes are comae 07- hQ conditions for approval ",pf Davelopatiht Ravi 87-33*. 190 eiMent ZI1S� � Tura y tv ,grant Ue lone rthe following development incentives for 'deve . pzient re f., _y!e P.ro ecte i a ,. The maximum density_ per acme an the site shall lea increazed to 35.05 dwelling units per acre; b. The zaximum number or required off- street parking spaces shall bey ,lcwa7rod to ane {I} pick$ g space per dwelling writ: end C. City requirements for covered parking spaces shall be'` waived in th'3ir entirety. 20. Rxgja2t Rosism aug ities t2x J -' Citizens. The Project open space, buildings and individual apartments shall be designed with physical_ .amenities catering to the noads and desires ref the seanic& citizeb residents. in addition to those conditions sat forth in Exhibit 'IS" hereto, the following physical amenities shall be substantially included in the project: a. Elevator services shall be provided to all upper story apartments b. all units shnl i be designed for handicap access,, o. All units shall possess sso& dad emtzyvays of a` common enclosed hallway r `1 d. Handrails shall be iarovided, in all hailtitays; e. Building space stall be devoted for tenant group meetings; and f, Recreational amenities shall include, but not limited to, >puttinc greens and shufflebo&xs d courts f, and its a atipA. Developer agrees to and shall. bold Cicy eeted officials, officers, agents and employees harmless from liability for damage or claims for damilge for personal injuries, including death, and claims for propetrty damages which may arise from the direct or indirect operations of Developer or those of his contractor, subcontractor, agent, employee o:: other yerson acting on his bahalf which relate to the Project. Developer, agrees to and shall defend City and its elected officials, officers, agents and employses` with respect to actions for damages oaussd or alleged to have been caused by reason of Bevel6periz activities in connections with th3 Project. Yhiis hold harness proaision applies to all damages and claims for damage waffvared or alleged to have been suffesra.,r;: ;by reason of the operations referred to in this Development Agre4isjs at :regardless of whether or not the city prepared, s4,+jilisdt or approved the plans, specifications cr otrier do�cuf�nto for the s Project. 22. =gndwmts. This Agreement may be anended or canceled, in whole or in part, only by mutual writt"-nsent of the parties and then in the manner provided for in CA ifw-=nia Government Code Sections 60868 et seq. 23. Znforcement. In the event of a default under the provisions of thib Agreement by Developer, City shall give written notice to Developer (or-its successor) at the address of the Project, and by registered or cortifited mail addressed to thi address stated in this Agreent, and if such violation is not corrected fo the reasonable satisfaction of City within thirty (30) days after such notice is given, or if not corrected within ouch reasonable time as may be ze-quired to cure the breach or dw aul.t if said breach or default cannot be cured :within thirty (30) days (provided that acts to cure the breach or default must be commenced within said thirty (30) days and must thereafter be diligently Loursued,by Developer), then City may, without further notice, declare a default under this Agreement avd, upon any Ruch, declaration of default, City may bring assay action necessary to specifically enforce than obligations of��7)eveloper growing out Of the operation of this Development Agree�nt, apply to anv court, state or federal, for injunctive relief igoinst any viol Lion by Developer of any provision of this Agreement, or apply for such other relief as may be appropriate. r _�4 " yr o• _�4 I x4, Event i�r wive °r is in,detault under th sc ' Agreement upon the hap Sing of one or rre of the fo #owin event- of oonctitians: i J a.` If a material 10arranty, representation ,or 'statement is mad* o% rug nishad by Developer to City at4< is F a false or g etl to hwo been false in any material. respect when it was made b. If a finding rind determination is made by a city- followiY4 an annual review pnrsuant� paragraph 12 hereinabove, ui On the basis 'of subsataa tial evidsstxce that Developer has not complied in good faith with any material term's and conditions of this Agreement, ilfter notice and pportunitla to cure as described in paragraph, 23 herein:x over or j' C. i, breach by DevelojA,r of any of the provision's or terms of this Agree nt, artes: notice and opportunity to cure as provided in paragraph 23 hexeins&bave. F ` 25. HR WAiMer gj'8UedieFSa. City 40es not w&&& anyV Flaim � defect in performance byF Movelopp��!!;�� ii' o a lZSrri�ic review ` does not enforce or terminate this Agreement. Nonperformance by Developer shall not be excused because perforsmaano° by Developer of the obligations Izwrein contained would be unprafitable, difficult ar expeneivo or because ;of a failure of any third patty,_ � or entity, a4her than City. All dt:her remediies at law or in equity which are not otherwise provided for in this Agreement or J in City's regulation* governing development agreements are available to the parties to pursue in the event that theses is ,a 1 bre6ch of this Development Agreement., No waive: by City of any breach r default under ttais velopment Agreement $hall be sir' = ed to be a waiver of any other subsequent broach thereof or .fault hereunder, u 26. Rim 9f . 2ndM Yid IhU &qtt dement Should Developer place ar cause to be placgd any encumbrance or lien on the Project, or any part ther4of, the boa ficiary ("Lander") of said encumbrance or lien, including, but not limited to, ssaortgagee, shall have the right at zany time, during the term of this Agreement and the existence of said encumbrance or lien to a. Do any act or thing required of Develoj�ar under this AAgreement, and any suqli act or thing done ar perfor"d y Lender shall be as orfective as if donwo-by Developer � itself; s 1.0 i b. Realize on the secur -Ity afforded k.V the enn�} rain" or _fuen by exercising forecicsv'te tiot�1.4dinga or po-ver of .w le ar other remedy afforded in equity or by the so;:= ty document evideneiner':ho encumbrance or lion ,(hereinafter ;referred to as "the trust deed. "); C. Transfer, convey or assign the title pt' Davelesper to the Project to any purchaser at any f6reclosurO 3alS, whether the foreclosure gale be conducted pursuant to court order or pursuant to a power of sale contained in a trust dead; and d. Acquire and succeed to the interest of Developer by virtue of any foreclosure sale. whether the fore- closure aala be conducted pursuant to a court order or pursuant to a power of sale conta��ned in a trust deed. 27, Notig t& Lender. City shall give writt,;, once of any default or breach under this Agrea3men% by Prr���e�,: =j� owner to Lender and afford Lander the opportunity aMR!- servicee al* the 1! notice to: a. Cure the breach or default within sixty (60) days after service of said notices, where the defaultf, can be cured by the payment of money b. Cure the breach or default within sixty (60) days after service of said natice where the breach or , default can be cured by something other than the I payment of money and can be cured within that time; or c. Cure the breach or default in such reasonable tame as way be required where something other than payment of money is required to cure the breach or default and catanot be performed within sixty (64) days after said notice, provided that acts to cure the breach or default are commenced w 4-,hin a sixty (60) day period after service of said notice of default, on Lender by City and are thereafter diligently continued by Lender. 28. Acti9P by lmslar. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, a Lender may fck estall any action by City for a breach or default under the tadis of this Agreement Xy Devhlope} by cormencing proceedings to foreclose its eencumbrance `or lien' on - the Project. The; p,:odeedinge so commenced :m ay be for foreclosure of the encumbrance by order of court 'or for foreclosure of the encumbrance under a power of sale contained in the inst,,umant creating the eac=brance or lien. 1%6 proasedings shalt nnt, however, fox:estal.l, any such action by tb* C3ty for the default-or breach by boveloper unless: a. They arir ci rxeEncetd wit:.him, sixty (60) day's after service on =.ender of the 9noticee describer) herain- above; u b. They a are, after ba'cting boan cozzanced, diligently purr u d in the traanner. required by law to compl*tion; C. sender k6epa ,,mom pe7;f -,r alb" of the totarj, covenant* 1dt1 r kndr j�J!' s of this 'igreement requa T' inq .. the payment or og;4nditure of money by Developer until that;: forocIrsure proceedings ar* compl eta or are discharged by redwTip iorx, sest"isfa Lion or paylaent. 29. Rent 92nt=1l. In consideration for the ,]lini.tations hereih provided, City agrees that it shall note, during the taeran of this Agreement, take any action,,tite+ efface of which will be to control, determine or` affact: tha rent* for apartaint.: pun is loctatea in thip Project. `-- 30. Xgt3i"t. Any notice racpxirad to be given by t;ho tortes of this Agreament shall bwt pr:ov4dedt by certified wail, rcr #urn reaeiptw requested, at the addreAw of fiche r4upwativre parties as specified below or at any other 'such address aft Xay be later specified by 't%e parties herrsto= To Devo rz ficurso Davaxcpment Co. E ., -2, Clover Drives,_, Suite 7.x.0 <, 9cWV -ort; peach, California 02663 ,Attention: 1; TA City: City' of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Base Line, suite •a P.O., BOX 807 Rancho Cocai6nga,- -- California 91730 Attention L umen Wasserman, City manager 33< Attorrr+a za- . In any progaedi.ngas arising frc the Q � enforcement of this Develop;*ent Agre+exi nt or because of an alleged breach -!�ir default hereunder, the prevailIAT party shsrll.. be entitiel to recover its costs and its raaaer�n�b7 a �ttornaslrsr ' <: 1 r' ` fats incurred during the proc�esdinq as' may b a zE i" , within th, discretion of the court.,, 32.}an inr� �iec2sie4gee3n�sYt sha13 b3�d, d fihe ber�.�s��s andiurde3FS hef s�hrtll 3riiRY; tor;.thet xespeot alto and them egsX reapreeenti itre, eitecutas� a �tra,t.cce,� sup cessors+nd assigns, whereYer ce�ntextc:� "e�''t� a s`tl 33, n� lic�bae .; .ie a e nt ha x>e. ,oEiet dd i accordanceittr California. 34. parti,:U if any provisions of this Agra i� - &- � —,; ' dial] be ,rla nteci to be ta id, illegal cr u:tenforceablaa, `CNiQ validity, egal fir or en oxc 2 ility of tti%e remalning Vroyk%icns Hereof shall not ;izi any way nffec "�i or imprsred Ghee:. �. 35. '2992_"datioA.. This A�-rqwwnt. shall, at t#t+6 expears.,� 2f 12evE�lope ., be repordoci in, ins Official Reco a of the t. MUt Recorder of the county-4t, Sari IN WhY'Yd�S ' E tlP '�8� �igree Beni `i!3 beer*' exec�f the parties sad_ shall `tie off eu't " e can ,:the o1�� ire data sew -. forth 1'lereinabcire, CTITY OF PJWM! CUCAt OXczA Dated: ;-.:'.AT -m W. XO*C 5E,. dba r =' NoURSE DgVBLOP MM co., a salmi i?ririatrrshi a Y . meter NoNouree, graa'e+r_""`" " Ilk s k _ o - STATE OF CALIFORNIA Ct}UAITh OSe: W City council Mi n r 4s �: \ Page Ifs ,ir. Lorimer stated that an Friday of this week Vity were Ling with the Cjti,L 4 of Ontario and Fontana t ±-. look at soffie tYPt Of Joint ,rsn Councilwomen Brown asked If -there s'nould not be s e;oesentation from the-. puviic. Mayor Stout appointed from the audience Mrc ochran; Jok Lefler, and Debra Kiedrowski to also work with the subcomi ;and Staff on this. ,+ The meeting, reconaened at 3:15 p.0. Mayor Stow called a reeeazt with all members of the Ca"nI it ft'I`* it 94 9r Ga. OF -1-M REAA 6 PROPOSED MEASURE � � A report an the status of Measure A, the proposed f -cent sa es tax to ,fie used for further developmesit of the dotal and gional trane portation infrastructure, Staff report presented by Mark Lor , senior l4clminlstrative Analyst. ACT s Council received and filed itte ro`rt. ? TAC DEB �2P tENT G5. PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF DEVELOPMVIT AGREEMENT - _h •te Deve opment `Agrperee9it wit `s CORPORI Pre minar,r"�av ew _ o N, _ Overlay District Devi; opment Corporation for a p"ro�ect c€ -1: the Senior iie ue.:' near the southwest corner of Base line �s0 Archibald Avenue. Staff report by Otto Kroutil,,DePutY City Planner= IAaYOr ,stout asked if ' �o<<epl icant wit-bed to address the rfsnc`Y . Addressi nq Council were: _. Pete pita$si, of Pitasz: QaimcL Archx%ects who presentad.tye site plan.amd wl;�t over the arch ite- .�Jre.;_\ Terry Christenson, TAC Development "and Robert. Dutton, Security tManagcaent Wilma Bfanner spoke on behalf ois, the Seniors of the community and encourad proceeding ahead with this development. It �►as by far the best propotal and there was a need for 3uCh development. There being no further ccmments from the rublic, the discussion period was 0 used E t Councilman King expressed that he had no!;, over the O)gne of fees, would prefer net waiving fees and no!„ havi it 100X dei4ned through the ` af4ardable.ranget In terms of the land u,e and 2�ea where it wa% designed, it was appropriate+ and a good addition. �;_ Items «CDEE gii Nil ' City Couno,1 Minutes duly 15, 1987 Pago 1X roorccilwMan Wright erprosS4 that, she h ' zanC�:� nr „- expressed to her by the neighbv'rs about the nGc $s i °f � i teak a4 it the #e s r;�` h<ai idirg, about :he enGrnaclmYest of the rtgiot'tfsf avid coiwn#r ;ial a, and saw concerns expressed being ffci sq next to It bath fences. Slit ai!sa had some concerns about 'It being affordabZa. She felt that Perhaps we could' >geti even cheaper. Councilwoman Brown felt this wts a *quick fix”. She felt t}er& were better areas in thci MY fAr such * "Jest where it Would not 'infiltrate existing neighborhoods, Mayor Stout Taft this w,,s ,,,,Ideal JoCatiod ffl, today. Pis:tne.& cox>�„ntties r; would have m nior chi n housing in the futu a but in about five years. Councilman Cguet felt this a gooa»ltscatjion,: but tfs treaded to by some things mitigated with the wr4unding a's tizffic.tirculatim Councilman King felt this SWU14 proceed forward. through the process. Council r should look at this package againf however.; Councilman Buquet,w*nte! to see�th #a pv�ject 100% affordable. He would like to set u p rote parameters:. such 'as 80 or 851 of,-the units be, in the affordable f range. MOTION.- / ved by King, s €corded by Suqudt tfi, procoed ahead. Motion carried unenimp, °day S -O. G CONS D�RAYIOIi OF RETATMIKG THE 5Ekvice$ 't1F 'A Pit{iFES�1OKAL SEARCH FIRS TO IK t3 ci9 U Y ;'Y MINCER- to report by otert -s stant ity mdnager. f,. MOTION: Mow Stout, seconded by Ouquet to author izI staff to Proceed with Shannon and A5 ISO a pro e3$10621 search firm at the ccit of $6500 .plus expenses not to excea iO. Kat,ion carried 3-2. (.Drawn and Wright no.) Gi. APPROVAL OF LOAN AGREEMENJ' CO', 97 RELATIVE 1 APM 20t ?� `ND APN �}1 -2 1 -42 WITHIN S N3 S s33�' O `r�Y N Y �� ?f RIK. APPLICANT WITHDREW REQUEST- rOR LvAtyt NbRE M JULY t, 15987 AiOTIOl9; Moved by Stout, seconded by Bulquet to re a and file the a�gree�t.. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0, , PUNNING COMISSION ,m: UTXOti NO. _ DR 87 -55 March. -23 Page 4 contribution to the future iee as $e ad ��tilitiesS C2 An in lieu of the existing side .tae A.T. underRr_...� 9 the opposite side Ic nicati, ) on id to the�olt� pprior to the >S.F. Raiirtshall be the fee snail be one - ` issuance c,f bk'ilding peunit 'a�nnunt tires the length } half the City adopted ` from the enter of Raatttes#t!r Avenue >r� the center Vii` sic ;�w I »15.. State �i. _,Y $ 3 A Permit shall be rtquire'S frc the -of & S.F. Railroad for any work within thii'r r,ght- cfi_way, " foc Racitr ste `+)enlie, shall be coWat b:o - (4) ikre design o*_-_ flroad CNssing PrQ.'e with the pNposez�, ; . • �� l ovtifiy to the k' Secretory to this Crraar►issi �n shall ry -- 6. The DWIV adaptio�I of thi. Resolution. Ci{, 1588. (r APPF. YfD -gjjs 23R0_:9AY OF v PLANNING C iISSION Or ►i K�I [Y' OF RANCHO CUCAl S A / g� g = 4 iS T3gan ATTEST: ra u er, Pu'�ec re, arY Coararisi�n -the titY utY Secretary of the P7annin ain Resq tion was duly and I, grad Buller', bdo hereby certi `Y that the fico eg 9 � C fission of the Rancho Cucamonga, b the Planni ,ning Cixpnrissirn held inerdduced, passed, anu° adapted y of. the P, regularly at a regular sxe tfng vote wit: City of�Ranc10 Cuafi rCN., 1988. by the following on the 23rd day AYES: CISSIONERS: HOES: MSENTs COMISSIONERst r PLANINIM U.ra ter, OR 87 -65 FULLNWROCHESTER LTD. March 23, I988 Page 3 (3) A landscapo planter Afive feet in width shall be provided along the north side of Building "3" to allow for tree.; plantings adjacent to the struc:tur&. This planter, shall be continuous except _ where access to a future overhead door is provided. V) Field analysis of the sight lines to the eaat side of Building "3" shill be conducted by the city ', PKanr er from the freeway during construction. The upper portior,. of the east elevation shall be pecially `ev, to ascertain the need or a `0lication-, of spandrel glass at,- the boil a r co r. If field analysis reveals that the building fbjeet to views frkt the frmay as determined e .City Planner, apPlication of spandrel glass �',tEwmts on the east: elevation ,pf Building "3" shall �1 ti rdlquired. ) . r (5) V1*1141 . design of the s+;heerr , for roof - wined t� U10equfi ent shall be submitted for review and approval 4 re City planner prior to issuance of building permits. (6) The developer shall, provide landscaping ithf,: theme' freeway right -of -way 'klong the boundary,,-,of this project. • :lhe Largdscap^� plan shalt' be pY -tpared in co< ormance with the CAlTrans luster Planting Pla„ : r the I-15 Freeway through the Ci y,, of Ranchot Cuca aga, plans s� AV also be ^viewed And approve(r-' by City X18,. «;er and ` he City Engineer. landscape and irrigation moll be ins,, a&Jled prior to release of occupancy for tho final b,Olding of the project. If final approvals and/or installation is not complete at f -jjiat time, the City will accept a cash dapo.. t for future landscaping c the CaiTrans, right -=f -way. Engineering eering Divistatt (1) TRte existing overhead util; ses (electrical) an the project side of Rochestv Avenue shall be undergrounded from,.the first pole on the south side of the A.T. 3 S.F, Railroad to the first pole off- site north of the project', north boundary; prior to Public improvement acceptance ;hr occupancy, whichever occurs first:. The .develope'0 may request 'a reimburseert agreement to recover one -half the Cif . ll adupted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) .as it occurs on the oppgpite side of the street. v It W.;AWNm - March ii„ i�3C � J� , � Mr. Scott hurphy Rancho Cucamtamga:Fla inn Division 32 _ Rancho Wc&mc:nga, CA. -V1730 99: STEEPL,ECHASS PROJECT (TRACT 130231 Dear Hr. xurphy " I bol$6va thr Si a�repi�rchir rr �' Pa�cs��aat,;� a�rnt�.onrct s�ht�v� it approprtato for a *Ultifamily use of th4,/ vma and 3s- „thsr*fura conststant with tbe'vaeowrat PISLn. t ”. It is also .an,, sppropriat+s projaot to. fit '.tha 'htadt of tr mads[.ta #»capst boyar. ` Btressrely, pzmuon Hos** /FNB 1Prajact'� t'TgACT i3ii7, 3,3ii3, 123734 .e.,ri . frf ^!<k�.iarerrz.T�w�rrai*Lccx# .met ='xl�gyES rxF .. r 4Y 6ai iRR�r i'� w s.n. «.ul..wMnvs:irl nu Jj March 1501-1988 1� c� Mr. Scott Murphy Assistnnt planner City of Ranch'a.Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Ad.r Suite C atancho 0acamonga., CA 91730 Subject: Tentative Tract #13823 -Alta Lama-Oxford Limited partnership Diaar Mr* Murphy: GLENFED Development Corp. is the property owner immediately south of the subjwet tentative tract and has had the opportunity to roview the proposed ,development, plans "d specif$,c4t4ons. we have considereE the .input of this development vn the commPni'ty. it is appar,err,1..:', after reviewing the grading, circulation, open space, and Architecture�t that, this project' will reflect the high standards prevalent within, the community. The const.ruciian Qt: this devalopm+f.nt will provide for a permanent storm drain which wo`uia hmndle the flow that is, currently. drainirig onto Highland ",Avenue. fit +.erefo& basest on t'he foregoing., we fees. that this projegt, 5; ~ould be approve as a.t has been submitti�d, Vt there= are a,%, ruent:iona regarding thin matter, ple�t�e feel free to contact, cue undersignvl - Very truly yours, aierineth °reen ° _ Assistant 'vice Freitlen« ,XCrbb cc: Richard B. Eisenberg Oxford Development Enterpristis Inc. o_ n y = ,i a CITY OF RANCHO CMtX-144A 1asl pTds 004 W. Ulm (Cueunop.,tahkm"A 91^30. "� +� +r +'•w° January S, 1 'Ar. arm Holtz Ugional View Pr %sident Autoserve N&IIS Box 1074 ✓" Temecula, CAS 923 fll;9r: IM -tit Dear Mr. Holtz: r, This is in response to your Movembo ; 19, k 7, ra rdin „ytu� project at the cprner ais vi►w,#art* Avow end Strc� You ststed�t the City's restrtctton of driv; ews 04 ?mother }�ro{�tsed "project ��. w���t lvca�ion affect%yoar projwt and devalues your property. Ycur objections 10 tlh� -°.- rth r estr cttohs s*w to b* 41md fiords the requirt*tnts for a mmly proposed project on property to .ice north of your `profit. These requir"entrt. have been developed Ir&tapend :ntlr 'Of any approvals-on prior proje6ts ce of anal. approvals recoMmanded for your} ' project. Frrhap3 ^fit would be yell to further clarify the City's position on c° Y d vRMW access In this.' area. When your project was originally revtawady ; t was deterained that Its access should be, taa6e only front '5th Str;Ct a pravidtd 'in that City's access policy vagarriding comer 1 pr pertles=" After considerable revtew and discu"ien it was dattmintA, that your project could have YifiWlyd Avonm access only if that accoi ' could be co birhed with approW access to an existing "project to the north. Nm that the PMJ*ct to your north has. been 0100ped P-od a now ' propo"! it under review, it has been found that acceSS to that property from Arrm Routs is feasible. - Ulth such zArrow Route access the acceptable dwtveway plan sa Yir are- Avenue for that.�property is different from that of the previous project. �. ; ,.• �, xr t ." vwst tt E'wmal wvsht , it kh a n' Anuiry 6, Pam p F rtgrat that vwr* is this rr:`sunrwa turxtf aho�'t the r+¢lat *IMP kfp of ttfss thMW P jOf� With that Cf 's 0 i .� hta rvtr, Ott tht� itjjtuz of yaNr +fit his,',' �� t�s �t ably i h�nq�e� Qther th�t�t by ,sue havfl aecurr ;- prapa sl �a c,uM .. north. I star4 r idy to wrm* Nf- : y a i s t vai ar f ri C1117 totn6rl #s!tipt�tbtwl �tirrFs Sa:C#ess t� Y irrtR ": I �. C011wlill ITY DWL c", !�Pl IiT OE R Jt7M lEF = < FiF ION L ' City E39ft*ar w ( l cc Srt Eu leer City Plamm 1 _. ll j II 7 , V J-