The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1988/06/22 - Agenda Packet/ 0701 -02 6- 22-88 PC Agenda Ii of 6 o o. rj �Y r aw 6r, AANCHO CL'CAa'V10_ NGel FL,ANrNING COMMISSION AGENDA WEDNESDAY JUNE 22,19 "08 °.t?5 P.M. I;Iows PARIS COIiihIIIwry CENTEi� 9161 BASE LINE 11ARCHO CUCAMONGA, CAi41FORNIA L Ike of Allegiance M Roll. Gail Commissioner Blakesley Commissioner Emerick I Commissioner Chitiea Commssioner MCNiel Commissioner Toistoy III•. Announcements IV. kvroval of Minutes June 8,198$ V. Consent Calendar 7"ne following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted Ott by the Commission at one time without discussion. If aayofte has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. { A. TRACT 130L!2 DESIGN REVIEW - RIX DEVELOPMENT Design fl review of building elevations and plot plans for a prei(,ou31y approved tract map consisting of 19 single family lots on : �A' cres of land in the low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located on the east side of Beryl Street, south of 19th Street- APN: 202-041-15. B. ENVIRONMENTAL, ASSESkdENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87-48 - FILET Tile development of two industrial buildings totaling 44,540 squa a feet-, on a 2.84 acre sit -e in the Geuerul Industrial District (Subarea 3); located At 9467 %94.95- 9th Street - APN: x,09- 031 -72. ,; r ;� N C. ENVIRONMENTAL A8SES8MENT FOR. DEVELOPMENT 'REV1SNt 117 -54 - GH11T -'ilte development of a 7,1,74 square foot restattxanal; ott I,2 ages c%f land in the = Industrial Park District (� barea 7);, IM&C l at the n0rtheaW,t Darner or Red Cale and i aure2 Street AP9, 208- 351:25. D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENV, ;FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -08 - GOLDENWEST - The development of three • 3 multi-- tenant buildings totWTrg 155*142 square feet on 10.4$ acres of lam,, in the Genera-1 aidustrial Distriet'(Euberea 3), looted on the north side of 7th Street, approilmately 600 feet east 'of Hellmfui Avenue - APX. `209-171-58. Associated with this project is Tree Removal Permit 88-22. VL. ftme arirgs The following r erns are public h6.srings in whidh concerned fncifvfdvF may voice their opinion of the related project. Please watt to be i eeognixed by the Chafrman and address the Comnif5sion by stating your name and address„ 'All such opinions shalt be limited to 5 minutes per individual for eactk;braYect. E. ENVIRONMBNTAI ,AS- SESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW K ] 88 -03 - SiVIITH - Tfi 'eeelopr�i int of a2_0 trait apartment complex on 1.08 acres of la*f in the tliaWm High Residential District (14- 24 dwelling units pE',.r acre), located at the terminuses of 'Sierra: Madre Avenue and Main Street - APX. 207-251-22. F. CONDDITIONAL USP PERMIT 8`I 25 a MODIFICATION - OAS -The request to modify - -4 condition' ,I approval re4irding reciprocal access for an approved specialty shopping center located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue AM 20$- 103 -I,3, 31. G. MODIFICATION NO. 1 TO CONDI` ONAL USE PERMIT 6842 SPESTErlN PIiCF"ERTIES - The dev@ pment of an integratc-d community shipping eenteir consisting of four ,ma or retail buiidinga totaling 335,400 square feet, adjoining mail shops totaling 132,228 ;ware feet, mine satellite retail buildings totifte, 42,560 squa'ce feet, two satellite office buildings totaling 25,822 square feet, four rasta<uhAt pads, and a 30,000 square foot theater. Conce0tual"approvat for a design centeir ectisistkq of ten buildings totaling 195,660 square feet. All on 71 acres of land in the Community CoMWreial ?District of the Terra Vista Planed Community, located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Foothill BouIemd - APN: C,1 421 -05, 06 and 13. y _ H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 9807 - MODIFICATION - WESTERN PROPEFTIES -A subdivision of 17,08 acres of land into 3 parcels In the Terra Vista Planned Community, located on the southeast corner of Church Street and Term Vista Parkway - APN: 1077- 421 -66, 1077-091- 17. I. ENVIRONMEYTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 80-023 - FIRST CITY PROPERTIES - 1 A retluest to amend the Circulation Element of the GeneFel Plan to widen Cherry Avenue from the interx qV,;. z;' .24th Street (existing Summifi Avenue) to Interstate 15 from a Collector to.a secondary arterial wit}z an 110 foot right -of- -ray and to widen 24th Street, east -of-the x�aap, (existing Summit Avenue) in the vicinity of Cherry Avenue to an 110 foot right -o€ -way. (2) Amend the Master Plan of Trails of the General Plan: to relocate the trail on the south side of 24th Street, east-of-the-loop, (existing Summit Avenue) to the north side of 24th Stroerr- ^- xst-of the -loop, along the northerly City boundary and to delete rtion thereof. J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSM�RVT AND ETIlIANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 88-01 - FIRST CITY PROPERTIES i A request to amend the Etiwanda Speeifie Plan to widen Cherry Avenue from the intersection of 24;i Street (existing Summit Avenue) to. Interstate 15 from a collector to a secondary arterial with gib 110 foot. right-of-Way and to widen 24th Street east-of- the-loop) existing Summi- Avenue) in the vicinity of the intersection with Cherry Avenue, to a 110 foot right -of -way. (2) Amend the Master Plan of Trails to relocate *J2e trail on the south side of 94th Street, east-of-the-loop, (existing Summit Avenue) to the north side of 24th Street, east- of -tha l 4i; along the northerly Q'ity boundary and to delete aportion Cher gf, K. ENVIP.01 MENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE 88 -06 - CUCAMt)NGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT - A regltest tCto rdduce the la: Width for Parcels 1, 2 and 3 and the lot size for Pareel 3 for a 3 Slit subdivision on 5.67 acres of land, in the Office District (Subarea l) and Community Commercial District (Subarea 2) of the Voothill Specifie Plan, located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and San Diego Avenue - APN: 207- 101 -43. L. ENVIRONMEfJTAL' ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL .MAP 10238 - CUCAMONGA COUN s Y WATER DISTI?ICT - A t subdivision of 4.62 acres of land inc. ; 3 parcels Jr. the Flood Control designation, located on the northwest corner of ftothill Boulevard and San Diego Avenue- APK: 207 - 101 -43. M ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATNE PARCEL MAP 17569 - BARTON rAVELOPMZNT COMPAQ" u subdivision of 9.Qa',acrca of land into 11 parcels in the General . Industrial District (Subarea 8), located west of Red Oak street, approximately 510 feet north of Jersey Boulevard - APN: 209- id. RKNU iONMEIITAL_ ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13.873 - WILLIAM LYON "COMPANY �: A one lot subdivision for eoudomli um purpo,% and -gn review for 124 units on 7.78 acres of land in the Medium- •lligh Residential District (14 -24 dwelling, units per acre) of the Victoria Planned. Comn;unity located on the northwest corner of w'ctoria Park Dane and. Atwood Street - APN: 227- 111 -12, 13, 28, 34, and 35. Associated with ' this project is a'Tree Removal Permit. O. Ei"VIRONMENT11 ASSESSMENT AND TENTATN;.B PARCEL MAP 16981 - 1,f3LDEAF WEgT EijurrY - A subdivW On of 18.28 acres of land into 4 pa � ^cls in the General Industrial I avelopment District (Subarea 3),, locoed between 7th and 8th Stre,t :s, east of Hellman 208 - 171 -58. P. ENVIRONMENTAL - ASSESSMENT , 4ND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT '800 -06 PREZONE - TERRANCE MELCHER - A request to prezene a 96 acre portion �. , th San Bernardino County unincorporated area (for pilazoning purposes) to Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acrd), located at the northwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street - APN: 225 - 071 -65. Q. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 88-LA - TERRANCE MELCHER - A' request to approve a development agreement for uture development of a 96 acre portion of the San Bernardino County unincorporated area (for annexation and dOwplopment purposes), located at the northwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue surd 24th 'Street - 'APIti: 225- 071 -65. R. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88-13 L ^i0 - 7be development of a five story office building totaling "._approximately 74,697 square feet on approximately 2 acres of land in the Industrial Park Dis riet, Subarea 6, located at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Arrow Route - APN: 209442 =16. rJ S. TREE: REMOVAL PERMIT 88 -31 - CREO - A request to remove_, approximately 10 mature trees In conjunction with the development of an office structure at the,soutteast corner of Arrow' Route and Haven Avenue - APN: 209 -142 ln1 rj T. 'ENVIRONMENTAL ASS1389MENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW --DESIGN 8815 COOPERATIVE -- -M.e development of a 1,700 guars foal reataur+� t 6n .38 acres of land within the Offir� Pro%.sional District, located at the northwest corner of Arvaw A Route and Archil" d Avenue - APN: 208- 811 -58. U. VARIANC -r 47-99 - DESIGN COOPERATIVE - A r.4.r'est to allow a reduc ;,.,n aired street side building setbacks knd the average Iapdscape setba -,Ak ;ror a 1,700 squarE foot ;ce$tutilrant on i .33 acres of land within. ine Office Professional District, located at the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Arahlbald Avenue f APN: 208 - 811.58. VIi_ New B V . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT , MEg AAb DEVELOPMENT REVIEW r' 87 -35 - WAI'RY MICROWAVE GORFORATION - Th,Q devalopm9nt o %€, 33,566 square font add£tiot! y an existing 9,92'0 square foot industrial building, for a total square foo iqe of 43{.x'6 on 2,0 acres of land in the General Industrial Distriet (SuMMI a 3) of the Industrial Specific Plan located at 8610 Helms Avenue - APM. I ° ° 209422 -10 and 11. W. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -56 Dt_VIS DEVELOPMENT - The dewplopnaeR df three i 1►Yl% Ilire�tmr's IiQpoats Z. w "YALLEY,D ' ENT'ION ACILiTY y C�QTfN�1`Y REVIEW AS —U3 CcT�rt @Sg I3 ?iFi @Vt O� fi1C Q86,dQii sq1-- � 900t detention fa�'7;2ty proposed by San $ernardinb County st the northwest corp et, of 1 trwanda Aveme and orarih Street. TX. C Y'Ambolon Busuuas S. Bdib ? t Comaments i MThts is the time and reface for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed a`ae-PE are those iihk4rt (10 .60t alr oody cppear on this agewda. R%, Adjowmrment The Planning Commission ,has adopted Acirninbe2rative Regulations that set an 11 par. adjournment time. If items go bayond that, time, they shall be heard only with the cons rot of Me Commission. i i 4C yy fo -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF WSPORT ITEM A DATE: June 22, 1f38 TO: Cha',rman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Beverly Nissen, Assistant Planner l i SUBJECT: TRACT 13642 DESIGN REVIEW - HIX DEVELOPMENT - 'Design 'ons i review of u?. ng a eva and plot--p-,Fans for a f` previously approved tract map consisting o 19 single family Tots on 5 of land in the Low Residential l _acre, Distrirt (2 -4 dwelling laits, per acre), located on the east side of Beryl Street, south of 19th Street - APN: 202- 041 -15. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of building Elevations and plot plans. B. Praject Density: 3.8 dwelling units par acrd C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: o, —" acan. ow esfden as (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) South - Single Family Residential; Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) East - Single Family Residential; Lowy Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) West - Vacant and Single Family Residential; Low- Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) 0. General Plan Designations: fro e, --raw est en iai (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) Borth - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) ;mouth - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) Last - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) Nest - Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) II. ANALYSIS: A. General: On April 27, 1988 the Planning. Coiixiission approved en URI ve Tract 13642 for the development of 19 single family lots ranging in size from 7,200 square feet to 13,740 square feet. The average lot size within the subdivision is 9,026 square feet. An existing single family residence is located on the site and is to be retained. ITEM A PLANNING C014MISSION STAFF REPORT Tract 13642 DR - NIX Development June 22, 1981 Page 2 U11 The applicant is proposing to, develop Wo models, each having three elevations. Plan 1 is I,9o2 square feet in size and Plan 2 is 1,980 square feet in size. Both models are one- story, with Plan l being provided 11 times and Plan 2 provided seven times., All models will be provided with three car garages. The applicant is also providing a five foot masonry block wall around the perimeter of the site and in all rear and side yards. B. Desi n Review Committee: The Oesiga Review Committee (Brerick, nitiea, rou i renewed the proposal on May 19; 1988 and did not iacommend approval due to the following concerns: 1) Driveways should be narrowed as much as possible at the curb and widened' out towards the garage. 2) More variation should be provided on the front elevations of Plans 16 and 1C. The applicant was giver: the option of either providing an additional floor plan or revising one of the proposed elevations irr order to provide greater variation in the streetseape. AOL It was noted day the Committee shat the applicant is providing stucco trim around all rear and side elevation windows. On June 2, 1988 the Design Review Committee (Emerick, Witiea, Kroutil) reviewed the revised elevations and driveway layouts and recommended approval. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the Development Code an en �seneral felan4 The pradect will not be detrimental to adjacent pr;;perties or cause significant environmental impacts.. In additlan, the proposed uce is in compliance with the applicable provisions. of tine S;�vA_iopme:rt Code and. City Standards, IV. REMENDA,?ION: Staff recomiends that the Planning Commission approve s e-91gn review of Tract. 13042 through adoption of the attached Resolution with conditions. Rp a full ed, rod er C a e� B "rt: N:vc A- PLANNING COWjq.STaN S_jFF REPORT Tract 13642 DR'4 RIX Development June 22. 1988 t3a�e 3 Atta hmen.3: Exhibit "Jk, w Site utilization Map 'xhib,t B Tract, Map Exhibit "C" - Detailed Site,Plan Exhibit `DO -Lull Location, Exhibit "En Elevatior, i i 1 at in b � AWIN mv -f S1,24#n16 N ni�nrwrrlr sae ,r [ 1//� + M 1� �1(MOJN(R !Yi y fP a pill ^ ^—r ..... .. ..._._ vp .WA194 1i0 t ME- at in b � lu �' � ti �+e+a a� �• •vas CAM � s� RANCHO , CUCAMONG KANNING DIVRON y f( NORTH rmm, ox 1 SCALE, 1?�i i7f6ib�ti t9 Ai�Ri?f6�k 1 % #i�A �t,'�5'C 3�9 : • 40 It // ,40 ::ii•� � �+�•ri� � _,,�µf ..,...'....... ti- t��_.�1�'�.fl.� .ter Ott y� L.. J �' � ti �+e+a a� �• •vas CAM � s� RANCHO , CUCAMONG KANNING DIVRON y f( NORTH rmm, ox 1 SCALE, jet 1 SECS��_ 'ff aM�Mrf irGC1 WEN r ^w MwM e Mtln wi �rIApI wf My1 N CITY CF IrEM, _DA I3Ld2- RANCHO Ci -MONGA rlu =� s ~ MANNING N v"�IOhf EXHIBIT; -.. � SCALE, A'C El Ell r c _t 2 E1+LMM -t AVEMA i 0 CITY OF I TEm: DR 13642 RANCHO CUCAMC� A TITLE: W44Ii Lw'419Pl6ll PLANNING DIVE ON EXHIBIT: SCALE: i�' RESOLUTION NO. i R[ESOLUTIOM Of THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNIh°G CqW!Ssl0n PROVINir.. DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT NO. 13642 LOCATED ON THE FAST SIDE OF 8 iYL STREEt, SOUTH OF 19TH sTkEE.T IN � THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2 -4 DWELLING UNITS r= ACRE) APN 202 - 941 -15 A. Recitr" M Nix Development has filed an appl %cation. for the Design Review of Tract No. 13642 as described in the t:'tle of tvlir.s Resolution. Nerein3fter, the subject Design Review regest is refer d to as "the application ". (ii) On J a �� 22, 1988, the- Planning Coweissiazl of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held meeting to.consider the appliratioAa (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adopt!.-. of this Resolutior. have occurred. B. Resolution. , NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the ?fanning Commission of the City of Rancio Cucamonga as folluws: 1. This Copi.nission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part. A, of this Resolution are true and correct. J 2.* Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the vbove- referenced meeting on June 22,: 1988, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: 1 That the proposed project is consstecit with the objectives of the General Plan; and 1 2. That the proposed design is in accord with. the objective of the Development Code and the purposes j of the district in which the site is located; and l 3. That the proposed design is in compliance with eac!i of the applirttbie provisions of the Development Code; and i 4. That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public heath, safety, or welfare, or materially Injurious to praPerties or improvements in the vicinity. r PLANUM CcF?Ir,SICN RESOLUTION HD. tract 13642 DR - Hix Oevel,<pnent June 22, 198$ Page 2 qP 3L Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in s application3 subject tooeachtang viscondition by taforth below' and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and Incorporated her €in by this reference. a) Ail pertinent conditions of Resolution 88 -E4 approving Tentative Tract 13642 ,shall apply. b) Driveways are to be a minimum of 20 feet in width at the curb face on Lots 8, 9 and Ii. c,) A five foe,. high- t-In rasonry block- wail is' to be provided around the Perimeter of the site. di Driveways shall be oriented as close to goo as possible to the '`- .feet. 4. The deputy Secretary to this Commiorsion shall certify to the ado�,cion of this Resolution. , APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 2214D DAY OF JUNE, 1988, I AML PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO MC'AMONGA' ' BY: Larry . e , e `. n ATTEST: grad u Ter;' epu y .ere ary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of tie Planning Commission of the City of. Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foreioing Resolution was duly and vegularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the CitJ Of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular mw -ltiag of the Planning Ccmnsission held on the 22nd day of June, 1988, by the following vote.to Wit: AYES: CuTa'Fii- ISSIONERS: NOE$: COMISSIONERS: ABSENT: C IISSIONERS: �l I W I` a V W� iI t Y yfVygy ig all VyAY dCV Y_ Qp oe ¢Y 8 M C g qq Y OYi�YY _r ill's „ �+ s 1 _ IRE I Qr b D >g jig ;. : gig jr y, V AW M3 i N M gag bag 12e��°ryqpe ., s ^8 $ sr x R a s. os .-IM' S��M�yyjj w s g �� az w N tom'® m a � f s �•._y�u =�w i o� a u,. ge e Y �e w A! W p�se�a°ti SA FYYm �ggL.�G -gg.. yyI mad 31 yp'« �, qt y� ®+ 0P 4 11;j! G 1 a q� I I C Y s{ b 6 tl j TL HS �j list «� � yJ c qR y p jg� L. pF. p � M = i'p basso j! by; ry �g gti�`y Cali•Rb + NiPii~ rlgx d..sf 3` MIS m6i Y U n d g'a -c n� • i qqV '� M Gf 0� aq- w^ Y 4 O r e c >" Y S s yi iq 60 Y � M Ztl <N Y60 aHl6 �gHG{ 2 "„ u- e < +� rs- nw e++p< `. Yr1 9i � �A. Lf. v. �q V.fR U Q Y AA r Hall air y� p� pe0 K S= MM O �a !�a Zak .40.2 a`�� t�V Sir Y- M GAs 6 $$$ 1m6 _u it : A V YA!Z Z. yy Wo6 ' �y Y3Y OapP�7 g1Q �.. � C�Q, �d =3 1 :a v Ay j' .p �9 $�{ �f�p11y� y� � L { ,gp Y D V y�O i G G. Jr13 I 0. =Y :N C • q. 4 D u p _ Le .yy� yy L e c > � i 9 a ~ ~ A � I tz YY•�Vp SS A�� i •RMM'ly'^' N 9y pp `` .�` XaN� •D Gm M m4 Yy �rH JP 2 y N S. (y �I yuY, ~LWjN�M 4y9y �y$ p ■,�c�s NV Fig- �j` 1YJ q _ g z" V$ g y ` aL% 00 j M Of fit N � i tltl J J M ��8B. ��.� ak•. y� � MMwy.q �.'@AO e.��w Y.q YyMq Y�ii �a� A !� N NS. M � �� =tl. as Fi Msq� �gi�•rW -` ' N y0 qD (: NAS ��wA � � j�}y[� M• A�Y Vy� WHO ��. �D� ^jj'� 'y ir� D ■S M N,ia6Y y 9� fl Y Su Y Y cQN s"a {(."°.p� m � q 1ppi VE od o �+,�' g � a HE � G N O L 4 I@ " y N V .. d@ y@. Y a _ $,N � QQ��'° � �`D"' aye 9.�lrc ( G`y y. Vv : '��'v fi `r �a a�Y 9.. Eli ��w•4 " -R ^d^ n.ru .y.`LO, ; nr y �b /dr�.N �My 9 ^� k'YNq O.VV •". �. D <1.s ®... fYM .404 aa L� y_qq.a. '2Qu• •"bN <4 •iV �O.M =S .�0 9icIL I H' 94 W s 1 �yy. �CY!' LtNG am CCOO C� OI� ps4 4q \7\ ei ��• it�« y..: 1yrOY '�.�..,� 1i 9�¢ j IL AL- If Zvi I, LW cr CL 2Eo "a> 3 � E � HIS $1+.1 -9 s 3 g 91S =MIN «sue 3` g �+p 4�a aynese+ Ski 8 yypp{{�0 g ++ E M a V Is py He -:I +N NmY YQ4 �+ Ni b ar•^ OM�^ Sit s iC� fiful Ifni U �_- � �d L >; I 1 q a' i O ^.� Y d` +v C sN Esb sas is b is dos Xg$ sPv 'fit° N$ ZE ZZ N.. 4 p N b iiiVE > p. P y 2 O {{ E b 6 ®tea[ cN Y(4p� Nay l�➢ L e`Y�u y6 ^j EAR �?.^ i! g `Y Y O � O. '`` l lN1� ■N. Vyims- I:t if C��M a6yC +V� fO O- bC a 4i C s yY bO �V a `m N yyM �y1 bO • f C fY N Ypl j� ^9y ^pty9 P,y ,•a~.�W.g p ^�1 aY 6r:1 "`7E`y� Mg�.O�'G si� C G •i Y�O - « OIV� L yyY. YL"y. Y� +y.� C�VY� �t! ■y §a.�� NO '. ■�i � 4� ^C �'� xTa ,�{- •�/��'Iy p�. M e op� '.QC4 i� E`q9 01 7-• 34� '1aQ �a q 4Q ppCNC :!. M. Y YsM� b +� 1Ta�Y.s ! -e yOY y, yXw p ,y 4y, -�..% NGV ON 79w t Q. NI _�i`O O4.2 r. N O V a � �' 7. y f■ e�vw.. � t� yy ~� �cgYma Vi r 1` 3 S r Q1 iPq� u �P yqy�!8`p g p > � ^;TGtq.. N a _ 4 9 PH t$�. ..$eon. q 4 e q �P d j N • +gyp{ w r !A th I Ziff Bu P- Co- ER q ■■VLY MYCr• UM A� AMq «® wE,�N a .A 4`Pq�y �. G9s gg y WMq. `y �Q ✓b ICED NU mm �. a Yf MY eei2 06�Wy -C t=om N. J I n UV zg zr Han N! 1C.�� s �� N411 �, � v� y.' 7L: f V y� �..i M _ dY Qa is \ « Sim 4:1 u, IL ayoll = ° a *�� 6 lf ew n� v 1x 'aa $° sit pQ --.s C 1y_ ez� '^ S$0 L�� C ^i4 or b F I 1 1 N L V 4 iY Alr } ��GI. � > � � � Cr G •� q • r 9+ ��g S1 C4 C �� Anp yS y� Yb aY aLi .pYit� ��. yY A • N �~ � +�li we z Y a= s Ells � 'e r W $� •Q `'^ ••,S ca. 4 G. . i7 yv�'�. q �C •'. <G RC 7 N d .SduY i�W n�•S? CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT 4 I DATE: June 22, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad 8urler, City Planner f BY: Brett Horner, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIP,ONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -48 - - 1e . eve omen o tsto industrial u ngs Toiling 44,540 square feet on a 2.84 acre site in the mineral Industrial District (Sibarea 3) located at 9467/9495 9th Street - APN. 209- 031 -72. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoniinn� -Surrounding — induslr 'h�'cings ai General Industrial (Subarea 3) South - Vacant; General Industrial (Sebarea 3) East - Industrial buildings; General Industrial Mbdrea 3) West - Single family residence and citrus grove; General Industrial i.Subarea 3) C. General Plan Designations: P•ro ec e � Geeneral industrial North - General Industrial South - General Industrial East - General no,"attrial West - General Tpdustrial . D. Site Characteristics: The vacant site has a 1.6% north -south slope. a on y vegetation consists of indigenous forbs and grasses. Drainage of the sitc gill be achieved through the use of a concrete swale, which stretches from the project southward to an existing drainage easement. E. Parking Calculations: NLm ber 3f Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio !2V fired Provided tift Multi -Use Tenant 44,540 1/400 111 l9i ITEM 8 PLANNING C"ISSION STAFF REPORT DR 87°48 - Filpi June 22, 1983 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant requests Environmental Assessment for Iffe construction of two mniti --- tenant buildings. The project will be built in two phases (Building A in Phase L and Building B in Phase II). Upon issuance of a Negative Declaration, the City Planner will grant final apprc -•ri of the project based on conditions recommended by the Design and Technical Review Committees. B. Design.-Review Committee: On June 2,. 1988, the Committee (�fCNiel. ToTssoy, CColeman) reviewed the project and recommended approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Tables should be provided in the plaza.9reas.. L Additional trees should W provide•' at the soathern boundary of the project between Buildings ".4" and "a" to enhance the view from 9th Street. 3. Tree planters should be provided W* -sn the loading doors along the west elevation ;�f Puilc'ing "A" and the east elevation of Buildieg "B ". 4. Exposed aggregate or similar Favir:g treatmwnt to that used in the lunch /plaza areas should t,,% provided at all building entries. C. :-hnical Review Committee: This Committee reviewed the pray ec a i;sime T3e ng on My 31, 1988, and determined that with recor-r--nded conditions of approval the project is consistent with tt7licable City Standards and Ordinances. D. Environmental Assessment; Upon rew!ew of Part I of the Initial Tudy and aft er ccasp e on of Part It of the Environmental Checklist, staff has found no significant environmental impacts related to the development of this project. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the Industrial Area Specific Plan and General Plan. The project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant environmental impact. In addition, the proposed site plan and building design together with recommended conditions, will comply with the Industrial Specific Plan and all applicable City Standards. o tr c �J PLANNING C%"ISSiON STAFF REPORT DR 8748 FiTpi June 22, 1988 Page 3 IV. RECtiWFNDATFON: Staff recd msends issuance of = active llec ara an or uereiopment Review 87 -48. 4sks, �i 1Ty su fitted, eCit y BB :DH :vc Attachments Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Man Exhibit "C" - Building Elevations Exhibit "U" - Landscape plan AM i..J° 1 CT OF CHO CUCAMONGA PlijkNNING DIVISII N 8-4 Nd'sF3,`1'I� ITEM,, DR 87-48 TIT'LE:. LkTL®N MAE 00 0^ 00 -00 10000 10000 (DO 0 001 -00 004 00, 00( QOC f---------- --------- - - - - -- r L--- '----- ---- "---'- NORTH STY OF ITEM:--DR-87-4a .......... I ...... RANCHO CUCAMONGA T 1 T L E: —P L A N PLANNING DIVISIoll &5 EXHIBIT:-,,t,,QC;ALE:_no,,e �U�'4H L^LP,K47101.1 - ty1.D'G. '!; ti. e.+u wr vw�T j°.l.QV4TIOtii - 6LCY4 ia�. CITY OF -RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1! I i WORTH ITEM OR 97-AR ZXHIBIT: SCALE. —n _one CITY OF RANCHO CUiCAMONGA STAFF RE 0 DATE: uU7 to 22, 1988 TO: Ct aimaan and MwJ3zrs of the planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller .City Planner BY: Chris'Westman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTA. A$SESSRESIT FOR DEVELOMENT REVIEW 87 -54 16"L - a(: evo OPmen a a`"7;1� square t res auran on "1 -.? acres of land ir. the Industrial Park District (Subarea T), located at 0e northeast Corner of; Red .Oak and Laurel Street - APR: 208 - 351 -23, T. BACKGROUND: The\' project went once 'before to the Planning cans fission as a Consent Calendar item On stay 25,_; 3968 and was approved 5 -0. Environmental notification was not co pleted at that tic , Thf project has been noticed and the Commission may now issue a Negative Declaration, Attached is a copy of, -the staff report from the May 25, 1988 meting. Res lly-s 'tt d, 8ad8 r Ci ann BB'CW -.v Attacl4ments; PEanning COMOSsion Staff Report, May 25, 15k) CITY OF RANCHO CU,AMCjNCA STAFF REPORT OATS: May Zs, 1388 TO: Chairman and hers of the Planning :,'mission FROM: Brad Buller, City P7aipnor BY: Chris Westman, Assistan!S Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL= iSSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 37 -54 - e eve opnYen o a res uran . o ng square fee`, on 1.2 acres of land in the Industrial Fork District, 'Subarea' 7, located at the northeast corner of Red Oak Street and Laurel Street - APN: 208 - 351 -23. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Act_ ion Re Jested: Issuan. ,f Negative Declaration. R. Surrounding Land Use nad Zonjn : r - es uran t;-IfidUstrial Park, Subarea 7 South Office, Industrial Park, Subarea 7 East - Vacant, Industrial %'irk, Subarea 7 Veldt - Vacant, Industrial Park, Subarea 7 C. General Plan Desl nations: Pro ec e n us r aT"Park North Industrial park South Industrial Park East - Industrial Park West - Industrial Park D. Site Characteristics. The site Is located south of the exist ng rte' '�staurant and is in a conceptually Master Planned area designatei� for restaurants. It is currently' vacant with no vegetation. Curb and gutter have been completed; however, Vdewalks Have not. The site slopes to the south at approximate'y 2 percent. E. Parking Calculations: Numbm.r of Number of Typ1 Square Parking Spail.es Spac of Use Foo_ tage Ratio Re ug tread Provided Restaurant 7,174 1/10C 72 83 PLANNING C004ISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -54 - CHIU May 25, 1988 Page 2 II.. ANALYSIS: A. General R staurant use is permitted within the Industrial ar-rk D•sstrii,t of Subarea 7. The site desaign is consistent with the previously approved conceptual 0 -Aster Plan for this block. Tt"e Technical Review Committee has made an assessment of the proposed project and recommended Conditions of Approval. The architectural design, through a coordinated effort "between the architect, staff and the Design Review Committee, is compatible with the industrial Park District and provides a transition between the existing projects north and south. Upon approval of the Negative Declaration, the City Planner will grant final approval of the project based on conditions recommended by the Design and Technical Committees. a. Design Review Committee: Final review of the project was giveri by a Design ev ew ommittee on May 5, 1988. The Cordttee t' Niel, Toistoy, Coleman) made the following recommendation for Conditions of Approval to the Planning Coniissionr 1. All materials, including column details and colors, should receive final approval by the Design Review Committee prior to the issuance of building permits.. C. Environmental Assessment: Parts I and Il of the Initial Study ave been c =p e e an no significant impacts have been found in connection with the development of this project. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The proposed use is consistent with 'the Hera an and Ina ustr`al Specific Plan. The building design and Site Plan together with the recor,wnded conditions of approval are in compliance with the Industrial Specific Plan. IV. RSCOMMENDATION: Stjiff recommends that the Planning Commission :sue a Negative W.Jaration for Devolopmment Review 87 -54. RWrelly r Ci 88 :CW :Js Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location /Site Utilization Map Exhibit "S" d Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Elevations Exhibit "nC" Landscape Plan Exhibit "G" - Conceptual Restaurant Master Plan - Barton �f lo L_J .��.►.IL a E F i � l�ltii5 yv0 pl1 ir i b e (SOO f d a a I� i i 3 QQQ //ryryry g � ,, Nugin u Qualm `} co lift 18, jlpl I' t Y � iiibLS'AVO ' _ �f _y m i � r F, .a � ` k ci v' l 9 n 1 H, i p k T •• � k.�•t. .l o IM o �v 4L� •�?' ♦a••— ..maw D CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Junc 22, 1988 TO: Cha?rman and Members of he Planning Comoicsion FROM: Brad Euller, City Planner BY: Brett Herner, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOP, ENT REVIEW 88 -08 btu Tdings totaling 155,142 e square feet on 10.49 acresaof land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 3) located on the north side of 7th Street, approximately 600 feet east of Hellman Avenue - APN: 209- 171 -58. RELATED FILE TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 88 -22 I. PROJECT CT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Act an Requested: Issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and zoning-. liar Iacanfi enera n us r,al ( Subarea 3) South - Single family residential; Low Density Residential East. - Vacant General Industrial (Subarea 3) West - Industrial; General Industrial ( Subarea 3) C. General Man Desi nations: ro ec tar -- Hera n ustrial North - General Industrial South - Low Density Residential East - General Industrial West - General Industrial D. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant and is part of a acre ego parcel. The applicant has submitted a parcel map to subdivide the northern portion from the project site area. At this time, there is no development proposal for this northern portion, althM,3h a Master Plan for the area has been submitted with this appaication. The developer completed eight industrial buildings on the parcel west of the project site in exists inic the amiddle f tthe siteiwhile a north-south windrow exists east of the site boundary, E. Tree Removal: The applicant �jas submitted a tree removal perm o remove 32 trees. The majority of trees to be removed are located in the east -west windrow. The remaining trales to be removed located on -site arc part „f the,norh -south windrow. ITEM D PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 88 -08 - GOLDENWEST Jure 22, 1948 Page 2 F. Parking alculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces c,f Use Fnotage Ratio Required Provided Building Office 7,600 1/250 30 40 A Warehouse 68,420 1 /500 137 146 Building Multi -Use 79,562 1/400 199 227 B & C Tenant — — TOTAL :166 413 II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant requests Environmental Assessment: for the Construction of Phase II Of a three phase proj €ct). Phase II consists of three rectangular t0ldings with a total of 155,142 square feet of industrial space. U n issuance of a [ Negative Declaration, the City Planner it 97.ani, , approval of the project based on conditions recoamcmded by the Design and Technical Review Coittees. i B. Design Review Committee: On May 19, 1988, the Committee Il ai:es ey n —reviewed the project and mvint vended approval subject to the following conditions: 1. The curvilinear parking aisle fronting 7th Street should be moved northward in order to meet the 35 font minimum setback from curb face. 2. The drive aisle width along the crest side shored be reduced. Additional landscaping area should tie a provided. 9 pedestrian walkway should also be provided. 3. The plaza areas should be buffertza from traffic circulation through the use of low -level screen walls,, berming, and /or land'caping. Trash ;receptacles should also be provided. 4. Screen walls should be provided between, buildings "A" and "B" .It the east end of the buildings. S. The center drive access to 7th Street should be eliminated. -�R PLANTING COWISSION STAFF REPORT DR 88 -08 GOL;iENWrST June 22, 1988 Page 3 6. The applicant should explore relocation of the existing trash enclosure at the end of the west side- drive aisle Gin Phase I), 7. Landscape ;planters at least three feet in width (inside dimension) should be provided adjacent to the two trash enclosures located at Ue north property boundar,}. 8. Annual or peKieial color plantingsy-shnuld be provided adjacent to project and building. entries, and withir:,lalaza. areas. 9. Class elements shov-d be returned 10 to 15 feet around building corners to ,Irovide addition:: treatment to side elevations. 10. Then parapet height near the center entryway of building A should be varied to provide interest to the 7h Street elevation Accent color may also be revised to achieve the desired effect. _ 1] The landscape plan be .revised to include the re4ai red number of tree pi? antings: C. Technical Review Comittee: The Technical Review Committee reviewe e proiec -tea -Tts meeting on' May 17, 1988, and determined that with the recommended conditions of approval the project is consistent with applicable City Standards and Ordinances. D. Environmental As: <essment- Upon roview of Part I of the Initial u3c�y -and- uon~'bnmp a �on of Part II of the Environmental Checklist, staff has found no significant environmental impacts dated to the development of this project. III. 7ACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the Industrial pee is Plan an General Plan. The prcj'ect will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or causE significant environmental impact. In addition, the proposed sits+ plan and building design together with recommended conditions, will comply with the Industrial Specific Plan and all applicable City Standards. i E D-3 try PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 86_08 � 6OL ENWEST June a?; 19aa Page IV. RECOMMENDATION, SOX f recommends issuance of a Negative ec ara �o� p`F Deveio9rdent Review 88 -08, Res UltY it d, 8 e Gib+ annex i;$s6if:mg r Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location map Exhibit "8" Site Flnn Exhibit "C - 0!;ilding Elevations Exhibit "W' - Tree Removal �larj Tree Removal Permit Application 46-72 r i L -J E OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 'PLANNING D1,7181011g ITEM. DR 19 D TITLE: 1-0601M JDA EXHIBM - A-3 ., SCALE: - W', GOLDEN WEST — 1 GOLDEN. WEST — 2 �.�_�ffCfTTiI • ,� � a ,. v � _ a vv vry vv vv b oo'�v ve EXISTING 0 k 1 8 NG. c BUWNC �z r d ^i�.n.•�Yac�K _� r{ { o s d w .r �f. • Yv� i d s� BUILDING ' ► s EXISTING 820MG 1 t NORTH CITY ® PLANV` LNG; DIVISION �_ EX IIBM , 8CALE. „� ' IMM -mill I CITY OF RANCHO ;UCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION ! 13 NORTH mm: b EXHIB aKai��Y wM��1�I'•�S.� �.L�V� ,� i �' 11 =TN"- 1:1 'a t STY i F ITEM-p-goo-viq RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITIE: Al"Are®Als -- .lS Ds. 6 -PLANNING DIVISION j>q EXHIBIT.-C-3 SCALE: Sol STY i F ITEM-p-goo-viq RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITIE: Al"Are®Als -- .lS Ds. 6 -PLANNING DIVISION j>q EXHIBIT.-C-3 SCALE: a: .a L-J o U ❑ o tYq �gy 1 '�lfY�iw� mNnlf 01�Y� OAR ONlft C t i ti v LEGEND TREES TO BE REMOVED �+ - FREES TO REMAIN NORTH ITEM: 9 ° TITLE: &E AOWAL.17LAti EXHIBIT :. - SCALE: 10 City of Cucamonga e GEN Tree Removal Permit DEVELOP MENT �E� • 22. Ordinance No. 276, pertaining to the preserv�:'ten of trees on private property, requires that no person remove or relobate any woody plants in exce3s of fifteen (15) feet in height and having a single trunk . circumference of fifteen (15) inches or mole and multi - trunks having a circumference of thirty (30) inches or more (measured twenty -four (24) inche3 from ground level), without first obtaining a Tree Removal Permit from the City. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT. LOCATION OF SUBJECT SITE: Nn'th side It-h-atzeet, rnn g NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF APPLICANT. Golden West Equity Properties, Inc. 1949 S. State College Blvd., Anaheim, C.\ 92806 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PROPERTY OWNER (if other than applicant): Same as applicant REASONS FOR REMOVAL (attach necessary 3heets): Proposed new industrial development ecessitates the removal of existing windows ( See related file DR 88 -08). The total number of trees existing on the site is 49. PROPOSED METHOD OF REMOVAL: Cut down and ramove stump. APPLICANT'SSIGNATURE: f DATE: Y it This application shall include a plot plan indicating location of all trees to be remc 'd and 7etained. The species, number, and size of the trees to be removed shall be so designated. If a 's diseased, then a written statement from a licensed arborfst stating the nature of the disease sh, required. ACTION — Evaluation of this application is based or; the criteria on the reverse side. ❑ APPROVED By: ❑ nENIED _ Reasons: Date: Notification of application shall be given to pr;- ^erty owners within a three hundred foot radius ten days prior to approval. If no appeals are received, then the permit'shall become effective ten (10) days from the date of action. This approved tree removal permit is valid for 90 days from the date of final snap recordation or building permit issuance, whichever comes first. Should applicant fail to remove the trees within this 90 day period, a new permit shall be required, unless an extension is requested fourten (14) days prior to the Expiration of the permit. 1 TO BE C®MPL4 "*W BY STAFR i RP I. Condition of the trees? .•fa { r. Ma' t are stumps with second growth some appear healti.v, a few are dead. 2. Proximity to an existing structure or interference with utility services. The trees do nor _interfere with any existing structures or utiiity services;. 3. Is there any conflict with proposed improvements? (8reets, building pads, wai{s} yes. One tree is located on a p7oponed bulking parr. The others are located parking stalls. on drive aisles of 4. Proximity of other trees In tire area, One tree lies north of the sfta fit is part of the north -south windrow }. The east -west windroty continues eas w _« rox, 5 trees which are not closely spaced like in a windrow). The western portion of this windrow 5 . Effect of tree removal on the aesthetics r f the area and the public health, welfare and safety. was removed Little effect since the first Portion of the windrow has air ady p moved in Phase 1. 6 . Can the tree be preserved by pruning or relocation? Unlikely, the trees are'too lart�.to be relocated. 7 . Do the trees constitute a significant natural resource? -The trees are not-located in an area designated by the Plannina Commission to minimize tre .,emoval in. 8 . Are the trees required to be preserved by any specific pi?n, condition of approv. historic land- mark designation? No. H . Is an arborist required? Vo DECISION: w biP�Y 1 �a reol ym�nt i to 'a new windrow of Fuc.-Jyptlis Hacul ns spaced one l (15 gallon size minimum) at 8 feet on center. .Existing trees off of the Property in the north -south windrow shall remain and not be removed. The five tree to be removed in the north -south windrow should be replaced with i5 gallon size - or nnp haeie J DATE: S�R1�R kVALUATED BY: �` 11 11 CITY OFARA'�'CHO CUCAMONGA DATE: June 22, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM; Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL. ASSESSMENT' AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -03 3MITR - e eve opmen o a 20 unit apartment complex lex on TMr"acres of land its the Medium -High Residential District. (14 -24 dwelling units per acre), located at the terminuses of Sierra Madre Avenue and Main Street - ANN: 207- 251 -22, i. PROJECT AMD SITE DESCRIPTION: j A. Action. Requested; Approval of Site Plan, Conceptual Grading J an, building elevations~ and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Project Density: 18.52 'dwelling units per acre. C. Surrounding Land Use and"Zonin�g� ort - 3 ng a family es en—tial; Medium -High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) South - A.T. b S.F. Railroad and Vacant; Medium -Hlo? Residential (1424 dwelling units per acre) East - Single Family Residential; Low Residential (2 -4 duelling units per acre) . West - Mufti- Family Development; Medium -Nigh Residontial (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) D. General Plan Designations: Project _ si e - um -"gds Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) North - Medium -High Residential 04-24 dwelling :units per acre) South Mediur `!igi Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) wid Tailroad East Lori Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) West Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) .ITEM E ,v PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT REYIEw 88-03 - SM M June 22, 1988 Page 2 E. Site Characteristics: The site is presently vacant with an average s ape o percent from northwest s southeast. There is an exist, 19 10 foot wide water easement along the east south prr►jectaboundary. 15 In addition, ea 15 afonstorm the easement, is being required along the south boundary -tor a future Master Plan storm drain pipe. F. Parking Calcula"ons: Number of Number of Type parking Spaces Spaces of Use Ratio Required Provided. Two Bedroom 1.8 spacEs 36 35 Apartment 2u) per unit (1 covered) (20) (20) Visitor 0.25 space per unit 5 5 Total 41 41 U. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is proposing to develop 20 No- bedroom units, 808 square feet in area. The units are located within two -story structures on the western half of the site. The eastern half of the site is comprised of one -story garage structures and open perking. The Development Code requires . that s*_aactures within !,OC feet of single family residentially location ofrthebresidenti l units s on story the iwesternhhalfhof the property. P.ccei; to the site will be prove \A f: °om Sierra iiadra Avenue extended down fron, W z north to k tide a cul -ie sac within the project boun�ry. Main Street, located to the east, will be designed to provide emergency access only and -the existing street will be redesigned to provide a modified cul- de-sac. B. Design Review Committee: The Committee (Chitiea, Ery rick, rou or 91 nal ly reffewed the proposal on May S 1988 and rerc, .ended that the project be redesigned to cddress the following concerns: 1 1. Buildings W and "B" should be shifted to the north to allow tree planting between the buildings and the storm drain easewnt along the south boundary. fft "r I n PLANNING C"iSS ON STAFF REPORT DI.MI.OPMENT REVIEW 88 -03 - S111T4 June 2t, 1988 Page 3 2. The sidewalk between building "3" and :he garage should be relocated within the stgrsa drain easement extending down frown the cc? -de -sac in order to provide tree: planting along the edges 4f the easem;ant. 3 The common open spacL- between Buildings "B" and "C", should be redesigned to locate the arboF adjacent to the tot lot and to provide more usable open space. 4. The rear elevations of the buildings should be redesigned to create more breaks /interest, similar to the frant elevations. 5. The garage elevation; (front and rear) Olould be, redesigned to break u7p the building mass, 5. Patio feacing shoOd- be redesigned' to ;reate a more open feel. The appl ichfet subOquer!tly submitted revised plans which were reviewed by the t_�fgn tbviex Committee ;ChjJtiea, Kmutil) on May 15, 1988. ne Committee felt that additional revisions should be incorporated into the plans to address the foll ; #ing concerns: 1. Relief should be provided to the garage in the form Of a hip roof to tie in with the b;iildingyr, and create more in+: rest. 2. Additional variation should be provided fn the roof elpatent a7o g the rear elevation of the buildings. 3. A spa and /or wading pool should be provided. On June 2, 1988, the applicant again provided revised plans for Design Review Clx=ittee review, The Committee (Chi iii', Fiterick, Kroutil) reviewed the revised plans and. rec`5i z—n-&-& approval of Itile- � Lject subject o the Io 'ow n5 Con °ianr4 °° 1. A spa /Jacuzzi should be provided, 2. The roof "eyebrows" on the rear elevation of the garage should be enl -sed to be more in scale with the buiTdib.g or should be doleted, Ci' PLANNING COMMISSIOti STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -03•- SMITH June 22, 1988 Page 4 r. Technical Review Catmittee: The Committee reviewed the proposal o:r -Va5Y--3-,``,5g$ --At that time, the major concern of the Committee centered arounJ the dedicated access from Sierra Madre Avenue. Currently, there is an access ease,nent provided from the current terminus of Sierra Madre to the north extending down into the site. The Technical Review Committee asked the developer to obtain the necessary right- of -v3y aiad to construct the improvements for Sierra Madre Avenue from the project site ncrtheriy to tits existing portion of Sierra Padre Avenue. This has ,een added as a condition of approval. C. EnvironNintal Assessmeszt: The applicant has completed Part I T-TRE aTUa- `3 u Staff has completed Part II and determined that C-.0 proposed development K ll not have arty significant adversr- environmental impact,- If the Planning Commission concurs, issuance of a iiegativa,Joclaration would be appropriate. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the General Plan ano evt1optent Code. The project will not be detrimental to the public 1tiealth or safety, or cause nuisances or significant adverse envirnnnental impacts. In addition, th -a proposed use and Site Plan, toktether with the recommended conditions of approval, are i compliance with applicablk provisions of tie Development Code and City s0ndards.. IV. _CORRESPONDENCE: This items has be.:'- advertised as a public hearing In The Daily -Report rrwrspaper, the pronerty pnsted, and notices sent to all property owners wit!!- 30J feet of ti,e project site, V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff -r° ends that the Planning Comission approve eve opment Review 88 -03 'thec:tgh adoption of the attached Resolution with conditions, and issue a Necative Ueda atian. Reqec7ully so itted 3ra Bu],?' ri ty .ne BB:SM:te Attachments: Exhibit "'I - Site Utilizrtion Map Exhibit "B" - site Pian Exhibit "C" - Canyeptuas Grading Flan Exhibit "D" - Ouild'ng Elevations Resolutt;p zf Approval with Con itiona i i NINTH f STREET JQ 7JW W 7 z w' tu ED `� l UD c CHAFFEE � �YREET • o m / l }Cis ,4 t • ic'ovrrr® i' it J e r v. ri `f Lin Ommo ,ter l .iiPt�NN Ci. -, f/�y'\ ✓� O to z � : • �� _�--�� _ : � �'� III 1 +-`4 ��—I _s_4 '.' -a�f. t.r_ ..n.r .►.` t.�Pr. tr ` 'it i 'V y An I CITY ()F RA:�CHO V% DWLSM TITLF: EXHINT. SCALL CITY CF RANCHO CUCA "C Tin.& A PLANNENK, EXHIBIT-'--A--/ SCAI-Ez s gr U., Ell] s �f s� �1 i m CITY RANCID Cl,,CA., PLANNING TITLE: s EXHIBIT.- Z s s s s e I 111/ a CITY cF X. ITI PLANNING DlySkN EXHIBIT., 0 Y.E: oYJr 1 RESOL +JTION NO. qP r A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVPA OEVELCPMENT REVIEW t�iO. 88 -03, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 20 UNIT AtARTMENT PROJECT ON 1.08 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDI1K-HIGH RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE TERMINUSES OF SIERRA MADRE AVENUE AND 'MAIN STREET - APN: 207-25142 A. Recitals. (i) Alan Smith has filed an application for the approval of o2velopment Review Ho. 88 -03 as described in the title of this: Resolution. `ereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application". (ii) On the 22nd of June, 1988, the planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meetin, on the application and cdncluded said meeting an that date. (iii) All 'legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission r*f the City of Rancho Cucamonga aw Follows: 1. • Thii Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the 4acts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Fased ur. ,)ri substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on June 22, 1908, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located, at the terminuses of Sierra Madre Avenue and Main Street and is presently va.ant; and +b� The property to the north, east, and west is designated for residential uses. The ;property to the north and east is Idevelcped with single fam ly residences. l'he property to thr{ west is developed with a condominium project. The property to the south is designated and developed with Plilroad tracks operated by A.T. A S.€'.; and complies with all minimum ode elotwL� t tandards� of c he { City ¢ofpRanaho Cucamonga; and (d) The detelopment of 20 apartmet°«s on 1.08 acres of land is consistent with the iwedium -High Residoti - -T land use designation of the OMIOpmeat Code a:id the General Ryan. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -03 .- ALAN SMITH June 22, 1988 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidaice during the above- referenced meeting and upon the pspecific to findings of facts On Earth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this C�:�mrrission hereby finds and conc,udes as f "flaws; (a) That the proposed pr0„aect is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and tbi That the proposed use is in accord with the ,Objective h Development urposesaf thedist district o whi 4 the site tis located; and tc} That thO proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions o;� the Development Code; and (d) That the proprYed use, together wfth the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safeot be welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. This COMIssion hereby finds and certifies that the pro,�ect q; been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California £nv,ronmgntdl Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Nega +,.ive Based Declaration. 1, 2 and 3 above, this Cotaissi ni hereby approves conclusions h applicationnsubrect t each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Ct?TMditions attached hereto and incorporated herein b, Sand d i this refe,enCe. Planning Division (1) A spa /Jacuzzi shall be 54Z @, and design shall be reviewed and appsredoby the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. (2) The roof i °eyebrows" an the rear elevation of the garage shall 1±» enlarged to be more in scare with the building or shall be li shall be "eviewed and a v mbyated. Tl, plans Prior to the issuance of builditi the City Planner 9 permits. (3) the following iiem shall be Incorporated into the final landscape Mans which Ve subject to review and fIpproval by the City Planner prier ; issuance of building permits, a the 2 PLAWNG COWISSION RESOLUTIONS N0. DEVELOPMENT REVILW 83 -03 - ALAN SMITH June 22, 1988 Page 3 (a) Accent treatment shall be provided at the entry off Sierra Madre Avenue. (b) Extensive landscaping shall be provided along the site boundaries, particulAArly the north and east boundarict. (c) A sample of the texturized pavement material shall be Submitted. (d) A decorative block wall shall, be provided along the north and south property litres. In addition, 11W existing walls o:s the east and west sheds be upgraded to provide a decorative treatment, Such as stucco with a decorative cap. (e) the limits of any easements anti their restrictions on landscaping shall be clearly delineated on the plans. (4) A final acoustical Mlysis shall be provir?A,l to address potential noise impacts from, the A.T. ,.E. Railroad and any necessary mitigation for exterior and interior noise levels. The analysis shall be reviewed and accepted by the My planner prior to the issuance of building permits. Enei, nee r_ i j pry sip, (1) The developier shall obtain the necessary right-of- way and construes full width improvements for Sierra Madre Avenue from the project site northerly to the existing portion of Sierra fiadre Avenue prior to issuance of building permits. The developer is eligible for reimbursement for the cost of e constAuction of the off -site improvements upon deve opment or redevelopment of the adjacent property. The amount of the re ±mbursemen` will be dedication) t acreage basis edication)for the benefited properties. street s (2) Storm draikl facilities shall be constructed and an easement p1,9vided to convey floras fran Sierra Madre Avenue through the site to the satWactioi of the City Engineer. Ak 6-13 PLANONG`COMMISSION RES6LUTION No. Of_YEL'OPME'NT REVIEW 88 -0 - ALAN SMITH June d2, 1988 Page 4t, (3) A 15 foot easement for the future master planned drain property of the site to the Satisfaction of the City Engineer. (4) The r; "Irm drain easements shall be accessible by City .Chicles. Landscaping within the easements shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. (5) An easement over the internal drive aisles shall be provided to the City to ensure access for City maintenance vehicles to the City storm drain easements. (6) An in -lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (railroad communication lines) within the A. T. T. S.F. Railroad easement shall be paid to the City shall be half the City adopted u0tp amount . times the length the of projeV, site. (7) Sidewalk shall be constructed for the entire length of Sierra Madre Avenue. The east side.shall be 6 feet curb adjacent. The west side shad be 63i feet in width to cover the entire parkway are extending from the existing wail to the curb. (8) Main Street abutting the east property line shall be completed with a modified turn around Q8 foot radius? to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 6. The Deputy Secretary to this COMission shall certify adoption of this Resolution. to the APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 1988, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE 'CITY OF RANCHO CUCAkKOKA BYE arry `E , a nrtan ,�, ATTEST: ra u er�epu`� ecre ry PLAFININCr Cr �3fssloPJ k S�;t�i1jE3+Y`fdi1;;�' 9EYEL01*1ENj °REYIEW 88 -03 - ALAN S1+,ITH June 22. 1985 Page S F, Brad 8111ler, Deputy Secretary of the Planning, Commission of the City tif� Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing qe °'ajtii:ion a3 duly and regularly introduce3 City of Rancho Cucamon9aasdt a regular pine tin the. „, Planni ;g coommissi” of the on the 22nd day Of June, 1988, b,4 the foiioW4"g f the P1�inn rt Commission held _ dig Vote-to.-wit: RYES: CO 'MISSI�iNERS NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: I I' c C ampina poor Quafty ��2 Y,a�ysMp yT�'P r� y�Y�•Y. r6 i+� YCUiLY.. N� 3,2=w �'�Q• e�i�w.�n dcfi c g�w a�ygnu Nc°'. qe.°i aw A - yas'o� �asun NMgg``�µ y1s..YM �4 T� vOrr.4 y�U CRiN '� Yy'CMI �p d`1Ay y Am ^V. �. `p 14444i��LY V I�Y14 i! ��.�*r 'Q (i... Y O�® YCi. +•rs�g�N•`r�> �rFi ;gip T � =y�LD sg� _�.A �N¢Yt Jfa�tlMp. y�pp�_C�4aIb p Y�{q�a' Y•Y [Y� V Y.��^ �FM.pL6�± �Sp8 �$ y �yQy�. a N_ Y■ � �ww.cY aN yf YON�YY Yw^ pp L cG r NyY{YV� '} �!Y ■9�Na WNC�i1 as �j�N YC 4�Y8Yif A Gw. .Cps. �j ls%i. w',�,;r �J �!v?�1 AQ•G„ La {`gG�ddd slM i. 3N I J-+� x_1009 �'anMN p ;� iwFt �"�Y �o -ear •'�«. w0�'g•+�TL oa, -Mrs.. v� e`'+i w�G c ;a£• � YuC ai4 °�e ^. • "f0p Ofd. Jr Cep �~p Nr gig JgyC��CSi ��Y �3f3�wLA�Q tfe'�yyy�1�LrC OCC _ t��GaN OYCY� i[_3� `40 WfOarL $,i~.T Y I N Of A W lel 1 N C7 f $ Y. t �c•Y �a�M W C C V c �lWa epQi y 9 T I 4 NC O Y y L N4 Y T �OYQ�n o 3E iiZ s it N d e C N C N 4 _aM �M VYY gG�yC yO. N Pj E �� v E 0,191nal Poor Qua -ly M Sp Y q CNj o . 'st{`cc7�rou}ca� �`J'ura yO °e°-.v ,Ga O',v4 Ga.+^ Ntq NW4tleG.oQ +L��oc• a. YY�Y^ Mw »syy�Ya YY'a Y °yeG�p�7 + "� +� pia A`0 + l ;f- _L =A'�� +r 0. Y1N5 cPC n� �!� M d YLppyyy�^ ^!! X1iab c W ^NI � V� C L L r ° ^ F. T E S �YU •c CN aq�C�N Yt i VV"q��y6eyj�. � wC�j °j ^°= V w. AM N .p 10 S YyY 2Iv,'1 +Cp "�°` §e`; ='°r'� aoui ''N�.� .+ - °bro�f, 'tea AjYY�°° YC ^TACO. °M� Yppp M W V G� CwY^ �Oq� "Yp G+ .CrMVa�. (1e1 M • Of NN a+ y NY A p •C � y p� 4 L cc� V 4Y og y� M qq L ��q °..w3 M.VO gyp~ I ppQNq9 4',. Ya`C �tl1yu{�+ ��2��L�E� �..yuNG ad � pL + Ole L a�Y LGMN Y MON ,qQY 3111111 L4 °e�W �u5i�` -� �+ +YO0.�^� '�CY�+$�i� TCYY+ y�'{C.^c.'+►�n u+ x _ oar ° +- pO og�N !/' ^� y�.=i �,$ o^ a4 u•Y- �y� '�? as xv; �i �c «m &Z Div S d °Y°.,u d cna e c V� .1G. .`Y ° Niu" ♦s . A$9.a. Y.. v1i'a ^P $' $ ajN � ^ P3�cqc . 00 ^w Y YS X^ -. «r�0 L sa 1 TL 144" _N b ti CC I �I iI I i/'' •� N( �� VI Yl� u —C GOe� rL V1VN Zw y o sVz Y y � LfL rY gka ��NH ` " Ou"W Y v=WLyqq Le aOY o goL" Ys+OYO � y+ =Lv IL's r3136 ° aq f Y J. S" 1. ^ ` Php .J , ;19L'.r 2 ` -A .21 MAY Y A G M 77 f � L� Ny N Y`s`oo �°$ `3pp�epdY 9fa4,T, ,rjiCpN� aN!3i n- p y4i j�0 9pLQ1 H:L ICY eCiA NCY C ++ O r!!ypyy 'N"'Ci + '' ;'' s+°$¢g v oy°0~�Mo `d GpyuL 1. 23- NQ„ y; aYiM 4 gdy. V'gG yN.Y_ yw .8 L E�QLN Y.O. pe! po,.e LoU� ao6 Ott ^ax�."z Y, u ^3'�L""'v*'gy4 G NN 4� LNM AMC 17 SOS a ^xx$x$DL� V� cN LN..71G CNC C 933 L. J +�• y'y +� L��p " 4c' w�.if Y� i ^ 1�y G C ri >1<y^ C M YCr1 .'�,� �apP �yc {L SY�V� SyY^a t.o NU�� NL4'.im+J}r }�P 4£ C �•�': ' Y ^ Y a..+ L.,Q1�^.�',M o Ci. °a ��, +iMYt Yny i�.g gQ�_gc�g uefi �+ ^ +�"i N «j U i" �,/ 1. +NNL� b tt'yLYY.+anZy C14. }1L £' <��SA �V ur1Yy C�,ty$Y�6` ^LUG 6CCftYY'`vN tY 4jta OaC SY .; v!'00Y+n Nw F.Y C,may I� .MC61Y. -f �7 N �1 0 g t� w a 1 4.14 X2, L L Q G V 0 ~O n° N Y. CCY O• ♦ A 9 C Y O\ T Q �.1. Q ~� qQ ��O.-�YyR -G. L Cwi+L's�sdmcC _O yyLy� dp. �Y. $.� =.r yri tl q�•', y�MUO .t ~ 4M `i ^C? r,N G C y� �N��Ly oi� ■` �4 � 7ay� N CIE u$ rs LM'j C: VL NN w °l.Ni. y' a{.p, C °LOV -7.4 `U N�y S.y V�:t »�NOOOLIII LQ y6'�M.�33 e9 a� � �� L • 4 P tl V.. O1 i y Y. ��estT �N pe °Jlya04�C`NLCeM 'L'�L+i`%H y~ fpm 0 "q ;$.lt Nl L�+N. yy° X011 ^RtlN {aVyK� cow� NMC$,�'4T� 3�N.sT 4 'N`� � N K6 AM L � e �• i w N .aL. ' �v< ■i i Tr Y �.Jao I : N.� o r�bi� -. �N. r� ' c.�cti v CO u . .'-Y.`� �NCC� � �M...y 1.2 L $$: 8A igtoCCCO. A • N j �N Lti a�ie c^ ��t e'"�. O�Y�O •w�� c�{y� .o +yi� L`0gs {a � ±yR, t9N!� CL YY T N •- �� N °ryte� o o ua CC Y v c ` 4<C a'NC i' UV i Oa L ' A• ^..4. v_i 9N� $• �.. �M. yV. �� Ua� � �ly[ 6' yuO ^t,4� Ytt N '} ;$i� C s� YNiiY vS �Q O TC�T � yYte b NO 3.5 Y..~Y M Pfi . y!G ca C L CvL �4•i G C 57 r a E O His w . L_ �((OL i► �V `._ C. _V � ^aydA- o.q °oaGGjL' w� ` a ex u ae a' w� �•y,•N•W °" �«'.L.n Y y+��T� .v � T 01 � Cti_ wC �� Y �a�r ■4�. •'`q+\+ r+R w9 L 7 6 N y t L r Y m r 9.4 1. <$a�s i`w♦. -a �yvi w.°� 2r `o WW <a aaa$� y p c5k - c 0701-02, ��___� o 6 -22 -88 PC A enda . 2. of 6 i =a .- vv L Y= 7 .rS C ^O G�4 {LJL h N�2Yq CVY �.0 a• yit Oyam+• ysa z$ .t. c�M r.Y °IL ^aeo'. d l� as •'.hi mo o..'. �a -� ua N ti oc u. as �Q..77gc,r, .4Y�d W. q8u'" $N�'U. ... p $M. MNN y..a OV0 -M. •M.pN �. a'a�. R'Cy Off. pi~'go ^ CL ffa ^auN }' Wy e� -no s Y rY. 2-"S W ^6^ '1424% « q �WyN ♦gyp y m� y.Wa CVO p ♦. LL� Lya. gYdqq Y� alt. CL sil. ' ty Lcaty h lL� cY��. a gyp. pY t7uyy. i.� a�r a P �Cm. .C` 7 ~y' Cid 'Y.O S Va ♦♦ «4y O ^Of y ♦M Y _�G� «® Y yYL � « N �•. � 6 ^ � N t C « L � � « � O.Cw. a yC�t � � > ^ � � N. P N ♦ i a �i N �n � r� L G !O N Y L « a. L♦ N 9 A al V V� AR w Fai nrY a ♦�4.. t�ifi 1=.'s w° � c ��^ �Va. «o.{a� �g!i�mtu� �.' o pYa.. ♦Lire n .5. ^Nii -z JSO �f.,➢J C D« P) Y p yuC ♦V Oqw �N�= Y 1'S !il g qy YU C II u"♦•QQ Yv it t Oi' 0:.+C. C s.SNL. ye MS e� IzG� � Q��O �� pN" � w�we• �O♦ uG C == Y OTC iO^ -5 C�:Gd b ♦M. ^> d� OAS C YL.z a.6> A A gems 5 �_4C Y"^ y p; qY ) _`.6 8a^ OyCde y • _ ♦`Y0.LN _) a 'Y CN2�«NV43 Y > ��a 3 NC �LC YiN . N • w4 ■t sl dV a . Nj 4 C G ixy � m y ZIG.0 � 6L LGi ♦ L 4.2 13 5qY , a' 28 .5—g E .8 2 V o y 4.1 is ;.L . N pt syAO�� - �°{y��C SHE {p{�Ly1�•G � �.�Qp�a y� CoW9� M?...A� L al. 4. N6y aCZZ pLwYC V^ Yll S� VN liw+ AY O C G f. CCY >N OY 2 u M �{g{�.0 N 6«nT NNq 4 L 1^r O ^G�w 9 D N a1.p Y.� ^ CC �tLN 10 «p. yyy 4.p.N ayjQ Y c ♦ ]]]A 4y as0 al LY HSC O OL a� 0 =` a� � � Eli ,w 6Q4{ V ; y;N�.CC r 1yt v CC L y ffi e T SCeo M as ® C cr'^t�a «. r ♦ 6b5 Y': C•+.O♦ Cdi 66 ■p7`O �W 6i� ^ YL+ N9NGY WM1 1 O y N W V OC O 111 rNG Ut+ N1 N C 3�� ♦i +.�. c4C bC ~b� LOYN Y a y`c.a ■pp ■ Q S.14 +4r. Si t 6L Y Q rn pEg 55gg3tt g� � �YOa' 29n& y.�eO�Y 6 NNVI Is NA® ¢23 �`+ a�+ 47 w+_R ooGL� N. S gg C Cy4 C ML ■ Y^ U N ;a. is C A V CQ �^ nni 0001�C N .q l�'� .0C w bLo�R 5 ^ y O^%pL � Q.y5� ~ V fl1 q �O Mp y O zx 6 C Y°ffp w ° '^ y .� i �� yVwN."�NO�L N CUC�g4 ■ O ±N:� 'j C C ` ■�_` q�. L. ' gLQYC +� L^'.C°.a $_ i y Y OQ �g i4Y Oy.+OI .§rn= L'yM �C O. O yUy�Y r p V ~y C1 a. yQ Y.U. '�C V ^. L U.yw +Q Rini OiN�� a w.�4s1 aM °Y LO VO Opp��CqO ,�yw�lmm`pp 4p q Y Ui� °rC.1OQNCpg u + c l9 PI yp�0 a� q� L' Y� -nr�ea DN i' ^�+�• -ac ��$ ~ra =y aq _: 6.d N� e�+ =pyQ�4rG O?. CY�G� r0 469w 'OLO� cYYU V Is .2 g U6 8 21 AN Mu V ^ 4Ntl Y Vy' U W ^ N 6 OO "1 �. U'1! Y U ^ UU C � o . :PC V + S' =U YOI SCO C Ayy d q +aY OL'yp6y p.^ 021 V L y4' N� aG _ �a _ _ L y ✓ gg a' w N`�'c�4� "° Cp yU ^ ■yy NV WyKC rn' fOCYL� 9 r L pf {+ i YX W KOC Y! tl q V u V O 6 . C:QV LAL � r�C +4 y NN . . . tQ Gb ~O07 1 �� nmC°■■ Lr aa°' 1V Fb W ;C 6 "' �O O� M y bew U. . OC6jL ��V+ Q tC LA � 4 OV. pM � i I G f8p °� �;� j Ls .0 ^ 1Y1. ^�U/ ♦V pA . KD�GIOC `SL° T T V ® '^ -Mom W^ M V N q V CU A V 6 NU +L e Ae6w aaL ^ ` Y� lta � N A V I \� I /; A 7 v z k\ L M V 06911701 PWrQua13i$ Y NiE, 6 W L�4 = OMNN.� � N .�. � •• xpU i� GHYbY 4� NaV M Gq` CLM ��• C L ; ^ G > y Y ~� 34 Ode q U�Q C 9 a Lyn-� Q uh 9 _t Nss (�LCC.M r S�YYOO�� c~cq � y�y ZO -pQOI� qVY Y' tJ F'ON g0 N.y =LLy NC `O �uw ^ -M _CO y ~NN G� O'pU G L2'AgO yS�M y =rT y COQ U S- W Y Utl L O. `pI MIS NQ i = L A 'L 01 yl p Y U A �. _ lie LL YiIIEVCCpLY�y. rti ^q ONW Uu Np Va0pppY�CO/�.tLC YU «N «Np LW CRyq }U UO L�UPIL 6w OY.0 ^M N 4.pt CTZb y.N yy= y0 r pG Y may. y,. {� AY.G av Q'J iisLiai'Y.y° {r N U W s M. L NU NM•OU C! AT r J 1111. 8 °$� V�3 9 4 N g'Mf Nee � V A 0 U d L j E :S q K .$ ° a M 2-4 Gyy LM N Is dM� N s^ VY Ss:: 11« Mp 1 =- NV L s� p a� Qy4 - -Wes. Ti:, °, � a�� pSpSpSpSp$4 e I CN aqz C N yT ~� A EpC-2 NuNJ it L f. b C C Y 0 ■'�u0 y C rS 9! Lv�. V L N N N�jM MC. M r` 4 AO NU NM•OU NM AT r J 1111. 8 °$� V�3 9 4 N g'Mf et So.°. L 6 u'dS 0 U d L j E :S t W V! yip: Gyy LM N Is dM� ~CqC^ VY Ss:: 11« Mp 1 =- NV L s� p a� Qy4 - -Wes. T22 C Y A U.; �^ b I CN aqz C N yT y ° q N V L, Y S1N p> ppgrp. V Old N O. y u 4 7 L Q! L a - ■'�u0 y VNyC rS 9! Lv�. pYyp L5 Y AT r J 1111. P Y 143! . 0 47 W �a Q. sd o' ©C611 Pool cs�� o �quN Mq 9■M` uClgn a'SCN L M 9 Y y Y Y a O L Y O a Ywy W N Jpy Y LM o�� 0 L M 6 V 4 CaC'. u .2 6t.'M� y Y Y U p C V C N O � �3 � L GY C 1yLy� aLi.N NaI iO g� g� G V QL •� L 4'L � GY�Y Y qL nY Y0 tli� U Cs OqL _N cN' w � CN 6 Y. XC h i 'Ca Ni+�Y .n M M vl IM, C!^ 6 Y Nv YY ^�. Mq 9■M` uClgn a'SCN L M q u u.a+- Y Pz' qq a Ywy W N Jpy Y LM o�� 0 L M 6 V 4 CaC'. u .2 6t.'M� y Y Y U p C v �3 Vr G 1yLy� aLi.N NaI iO g� g� G V QL s -.x A qL nY Y0 tli� U Cs O S Y Y L CN 6 Y. N 'Ca Ni+�Y N47A M �. C C NiY V OI v M NL L' �• L �wJ,f �• , YLV• ry. lr... p� q4 a C.9 N N Yy y Cy, y a�yyi a1 .�.. 7U QYVY YN� ~ L N •i G 6� C ti N M 2- i. a ti� � G',5 s�C `{ d y e < II IM, C!^ 6 Y Nv cc q�� Y6L Y Pz' 9y0 a Ywy W N Jpy Y LM c L M 6 L V Y * Y C.c v �3 Mpo �MQ UM aLi.N o V A qL nY {uL 4 tli� K 'bYm °v Y Y L CN 6 'o v N N yY O1f�dC ca u. 4' •i� � N i ry. lr... p� q4 a C.9 N N Yy y Cy, y a�yyi 4 NtT Y. >Y � ~ Y O Piz ^« Y Y C Laos y as a S IM, C!^ 6 Y Nv q�� Y6L Y Pz' 9y0 a Ywy W N Jpy Y LM c L M 6 C.c v �3 Mpo �MQ UM aLi.N -N 9y.. tli� K fLY. Y M ...Ow 4Y�t �° iu O1f�dC ca u. MwO 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - STAFF REPORT DATE: June 22, 1988' TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Foro Associate Planner SUBJECT: CON07 ANAL USE PER14IT 87 -26 MODIFIGATIUri OAS The reg1:s o mo y 6 don ton o approva regarding reciprocal access for an approved specialty shopping center located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and 'Vineyard Avenue APN: 208- 101 -10 and 11. I. PBST.RACT: The applicant is requer „ing for modification to a con > >on of approval requiring the recordation of reciprocal access and pedestrian easements between the project site and the Gemco property. II. ANALYSIS: On January 22, 1988, the Planning Commission co�ona?ly approved a specialty shopping center for the subject site. One of the conditions of approval required that reciprocal access and pedestrian easements shall be obtained from the adjacent property owner and shall be recorded prier to the issuance of building permits. The condition was imposed to encourage pedestrian access, foster integrated development, efficient parcel usage, and minimize the traffic impact along Foothill Boulevard as recommended by the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. The applicant has worked diligently with the adjacent property owner to secure such reciprocal easements. Nowevor, the developer has not been successful to this date. The developer is still committed to working towards such goals but would like to have some relief as to the flexibility in time to accomplish this condition. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission modify Condition No.'s 4 and 10 of Resolution No. 88 -17 to read as follows: The developer shall attempt in good faith to obtain J reciprocal driveway access and pedestrian access easement from the easterly adjacent property. D the event that the developer is unable to obtain such easement, the modification to the east property boundary shall be subject to City Planner review and approval. ITEM F PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE MWIT 87 «26 �, OA5 Dune 22, 1988 Page Z III, RECOMMENDATION:. Staff recommends that the Planning Cnimission W, "condition modify of approval. Resp illy s ted B d Buz Cit ner BB:NF:te Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Vb p Exhibit `'B" - Approved Site Plan Exhibit "C" -- Alternative Site Plan i I I r. I� f` Ask June 7 198$ —IZ - 'Z! i V r 0--r- s cii:'{)r` G 'Ci ivIONG'A n[.A' N j a O SMN Brad Buller, City' Planner AN Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box $Q/ Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 i Re: Thomas Wir,: x y Plaza Dear Brad; i As promised in yesterdayts meeting, enclosed find the correspondence with Richard Lewis and Jerry bicker regarding the connection between Thomas Winery Plaza and the Gemco Center. As you can see, we spent a considerable amount of time and energy on this issue. We still think the connection would be a goc:i solution but tt;e partnership on the Gemco side seems reluctant to make a decision. As per our conversation yesterday, I would like you to submit s proposal to the Planning Commission asking them to waive or modify Condition #10. Very truly, yours, ORS TO s Rudy Stroink Project Manager RS:mg Enclosures cc' Howard Adler Richard J. OtNeill Michael L. Strauss 2081 Business Center Drive a Suite 2 0 a Irvine, CA 271 9 5 0 (714) 833•7704 r% 6 5 0 7 Em +TH CITY 0F ITM RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: Aw PLANtvM D(vISION )EXHIBIT. SCALE; 11 11 E til- /I WIN-M WA�* wl r-5 0. O ti lu Gil I ■•: ss � ild in 1u;ass s xsra 1911 1;: �� i f'� •t � I i �i r1 i 6a% .l �R f'- �Yti •• cf u CL if x Q Tom_' ria �¢ Sisi RESOLUTION NO. 88 -17A A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 87- 26 FOR AMENDING A _CONDITION OF APPROVAL REGARDING RECIPROCAL ACCESS AND PEDESTRIAN EASEMENTS FOR AN APPROVED SPECIALTY CENTER LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND VINEYARD AVENUE IN THE SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN - APN: 208- 101 -10 AND 11 A. Recitals. (i) OAS Investors has filed an application for the amending Conditional ",e Permit Flo. 87 -26 as described in the title ;,f this Resolution. Hereinafter fn this Resolution, the subject modification to the Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On the 22nd of June, 1988, ti, Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public he3ring on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Fanning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on June 22, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission herby specifically finds as follows: (a) The proposed modification to Special Condition No. 4 will. not deviate from the pr- evious findings as contained in Resolution No. 88 -17. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hedging and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Lcramis, ion hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with th(i General Plan, the Fcothill Boulevard Specific Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the RM site is located. i, r PLANNING COMNTSSION RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -26 OAS June 22, 1988 Page 2 (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimenx, to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. 7-4S Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of I970 and, further, this Commission has issued a Negative Declaration an January 27, 1988. S. based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1„ 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby modifies. Conditions 'No, 4 and 10 1,ontained in Resolution No. 88-117- to read as follows: Planning Division (4) The developer shall attempt in good faith to obtain reciprocal driveway access and pedestrian access eas %,ments from the easterly adjacent proper, In the event that the developer is unable to obtain such easements, the modification to the east property boundary shall be subject to City Planner review and approval Engineering Division (10) The developer shall in good faith obtain reciprocal easements for the construction, maintenance, and use of the vehicle connection to the easterly property. 6. The deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this fasolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND uAY OF JUNE, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. MCNiel, C airman ATTEST: ra u er, epu y acre ary n PLMNI% CC?MMI$SION RESOLUTION NO. CONO1 TIONAI.USE PERMIT 37 -25 - OAS June 22, 1988 Page 3 1, Brad SuTler,..deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucain;.nga do hereby certify that the foregoing- Resolutia'� was duly and regularly introduced, passed, .,, adopted by the Planning Con .alssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd dip- -of June, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COW. ISSIONERS: KI CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I STAFF REPORT 0 OATS: uune 22,..1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad. Buller, City Planner BY: Debra Meier, Dissociate Planner SUBJECT: MODIFICATION N0. 1 TO CONUiTIOMAL USE PERMIT 88 -12 - e eye cp. -Aen or an n egra e community s opp ng center consisting of four major retail buildings totaling 336,000 square feet, adjoining mall shops totaling 132,228 square feet, nine satellite retail buildings totaling 42,500 square feet, two satellite office buildings totaling 25,822 square feet, four restaurant pads, and a 30,000 square foot theater. Conceptual approval for design center consisting of ten buildings totaling 195,660 square feet. All 07 h acres of land in the Community Commercial District of the Terra Vista Planned Community, located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard APR: 1077 -4$1- 06, 06 and 13. I. ABSTRACT: This modification inr:ludes specific revisions to Phase one of * Terra Vista Town Center project, The revisions for which the applicant is requesting approval, include enlarging the footprint of Major 2 and redesigning the footprint and architectural details of Building A. II. ANALYSIS• A. General: o Revisions to Major 2 - the revisions to Major 2 are being requested to accommodate the needs of a speci fic tenant, Montgonery Wards. The store area is increasing in size from 80,000 square feet to 96,600 square feet. The rear area of the building is being designed to accommodate a tire/battery /auto service! area. The service area will have one drive -in access with all work performed within an enclosed area. The architectural detailing of the building has not charged and parking calculations have been vcrified to insure atbquate number of parking spaces. IG PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 88 -12 - Western Properties June 22, 1988 Page 2 E .11 o Revisions to Building A - As with Major 2 many of the requested revisions to Building A ara being done to accommrdate a specific tenants needs. The southerly portion i:f the building (A -2) are designed to accommodcL+ a tenant, Pier One Imports, that will utilize both floors ,;f the building. The northern portion of the building (A -1) has been revised to include an enlarged courtyard. the entire length of Building A has been shortened, with the most southerly elevations shifted approximately 40 feet to the north. The promenade along the western building elevation has been detailed to include the accent trees and street furniture consistent with the entire promenade route. The overall square footage of Building A has been reduced from 25,025 square feet to 21,742 square feet. B. DDe�es__i��P. Review Committee: The Des °gn Review Committee tBTaker ey, o eman rev erred the project nn May 19, 1988, The Committ ,de recoianended approval of the modification. The Committees cwnments with respect to the parking P,Qar the rear of Major 2 ar:J the setback in that same area hr .: been added as Conditions of Approval on the attached resolution, Aft C. Drivewa Real_iggnment: The proposed realignment of the entry ari ve from av�venue was also included as part of the requested modificztions. The realignment of the driveway would directly align with the Brunswick /Virginia Dare entrance on the west side of H_yen Aven6a. As such the realignment was setting the stage for a median island opening on Haven Avenue. This proposed opening would be inconsistent with our standard policies regarding median island access, and therefore Engineering staff was not able to support this proposed opening. Engineering presented the issue to the City Counci. on June 15, 1988 requesting Council direction concarniecg the proposed driveway realignment. The City Council staff report is attached as Exhibit/ F for your information. The Council determined that anv alteration to the north of_the a rofed driveway ocation s unacce table. They recorc ided t at the drivew ay remain as approved, however, deviation; to the south would be acceptable. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS• The proposed project and the modifications reques a are consistent with the object, -is of the General Plan and the Terra Vista Community Plan. The project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause siglific,•t environmental impacts. The u4 and building design, together with all recommended Conditions r7 Approval, are In conformance with applicable regulations of the Development. Code and the Terra Vista Community Plan. 1 PIANNikv C0wISSION STAFF REPORT - CLIP 88 -12 - Western Properties June 12, 1988 Page 3 IV. CORRESPONDENUE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in a ai Y�keport newspaper, the Property posted and notices sent to a proper y owners within $00 feet of the project site. V. REC"ENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Cormissior approve ire modffication to Conditional Use Permit 88, "c?, through adoption of the attached Resolution. R tful omitted, Br d e City P anner BB: :vc Attachments: Exhibit "A" - UNeral- rite and Phasing Plan Exhibit "B" - Enlarged Site Plan of Portion of Phase Or Exhibit "C - Building Elevations Around Major 2 cx.libit "D" - Enlarged Site Plan, Building A - Exhibit "E" Building Elevations, Building A Exhibit "F" - City Council Staff Report, June 15, 1988 Rasolution of Approval w 6i na�� MAJOR.1 MAJOH -2 u� 0 LAnGET � jI�I ' f CITY Q RANCHO CUCAMONGA F PLANNING DIVISION. K] z w s C 0 NCEP7UAl 517E PLAN AR Ek 1 f NORTH ITEM 6Z�Ag-& °TITLE: EXHIBIT: . SCALE: ` tiuwr,Aas Lsau.tcaca ne p.wsofJ. L�gWe � i Rai I .V (uetswn:wynFt -. seCmtflTtArxM1 -S, aw ntRau --. �-- ssrrmrr�t- itLa,u�Wr� r -mat atmv � ` atocmrmntaawawwuw _ StCb M7__ riw. rorvxao ` _ ... yA,pR t /110Ppp AlKiEi AMR rY4lfl� fill rru NO4 aPra�Wals S df l �w i ( t,,,.�r rka.�L•t4C s rl _ �1aCaCM1 �x.nwi.wuwam �+car,ra �- rsewoear I 6�C { '. itDdp �, aeuoRS a CITY OF r CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVATSIPN TITM EXHIBIT:... . SCALE: =^=°- � � KOM W C; OF RKCHO CUCAMONGA FE" jt- Em W11 V. NORTH CITY OF 49 ITE RANCHO CUCAMONGA M 4111�1 TITLE:d/k PLANNING DIVISION :i -S EXH'D'T: -F, SCALE: 11 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i CA K m flift w -- ED cl p . . . . . . I I =NU ION Tozrirflb M-M-a-k- L14 Q NORTH ELEVArION scum azwom Wom Its -60M r. ovar DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT June 15, 1988 ^ City Council and City Manager Russell Ii. Maguire, City Engineer Joe Stofa, Jr., Associate Civil Engineer i Haven Avenue. North of Foothill '�loulevard - Determination i o t e urivewa ea nment or Lewis Deve opment ComAanY - A sta aquest or City ounci a�rection concerning the -;:alignment of a driveway onto Haven Avenue from the Terra Vista Town Center Shopping Center, located between Foothill Boulevard and Town Center Drive. APN 1077 - 421 -05 I. RECOMMENDATION. Staff recommends that the City Council deny the _ request or 1:Tie driveway realignment. II. ABSTRACT: Staff is requesting City Council direction as to whether or not a proposed realignment of a ,driveway onto Haven Avenue from the Terra Vista Town Center Shopping Center is acceptable prior to scheduling the modification (CUP 88 -12) for a Plannin Commission Hearing (Exhibit "B"). 9 III. BACKGROUND: Terra Vista Town Center Shopping Center was approved �iy t e tinning Commission on December 9, 1987. The approva l of the project included specific locations for driveways and st locations as shown on the approved site plan (Exhibit "C"). With Haven Avenue being a major north -south arterial, i; was extremely important that traffic conflicts be at a minimum,, This concern for insuring the integrity of Haven Avenue as ne most important north -south arterial street in the City is exrressed in the General Plan (Exhibit IUD "). In keeping with this general Plan direction, the Virginia Dare and the Brunswick Development on the west side of Haven Avenue were required_ to use a shared access aligned with Town Center Drive. This intersection will be signalized for the benefit of the Virginia Dare, Brunswick Development and Terra Vista Town Center Shopping Centers. Any additional driveways on Haven Avenue must be "right -in" and "right- � ! f /Jcv r I), v e r { ` CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CUP 88 -12 Lewis Development Company June 15, 1988 Page 2 out" only with no median breaks. This concept was deve''oped to limit the obstruction of through traffic flow an Haven Avenue and to allow the street the capacity to function as an important traffic artery. The original master plan for the conxnercial center portion of Terra Vista (Exhibit 'E' }, as well as the Terra Vista Plan itself (Exhibit "F "), was ,;onsistent with the Haven Avenue concept. As the exhibits show, the commercial tunter extended along Haven Avenue from Foothill B,tiulevard to Town Center Drive, thus utilizing Town Center Drive as a !ajor entrance from Haven Avenue. This is the ideal layout to ,t;ake full advantage of the well - placed signalized intersections of Town Center /Haven and Foothill /Aspen as major entries. An add',tional signal- protected entr,, is available at Foothill Boulevard M Spruce Avenue. When the site plan for 0e shopping center was presented for City I review, the Town Center; Drive intersection no longer provided access directly to the shopping center but to an office complex. A - comparison of Exhibit "C" with Exhibit "E" shows how this critical change in the site plan seriously reduces the ability of Town Center Drive to function as an access to "Town Center's. This access restriction, self - imposed by the Lewis Camnany by its site planning preferences, resulted in a rsauest, late in the approval process, for s median break at the main Haven Avenue driveway, about halfway between Foothill �oulevard a. d Town Center Drive. The request was deniad, as was a similar request made in the recent vast by the operators e' the Virginia Dare Center. It should be noted here also that, because no median break was contemplated by anyone throughout most of the shopping center planning and approval process, the main Haven Avenue entrance was located so as to serve the site plan in an optimum manner, and be an acceptable distance from Foothill Boulevard. This location did not align with the Virginia Dare drivewav 7:;ross the street, as such an alignment was of no importance due to the median island. A short time ago, a request was made for a change in the location of the main Haven Avenue entrance. The proposed new location for the entrance is directly across from the Virginia tiara Center entrance. CITY COUNCIL STAFF RED I` CUP 88 -12 - Lewis Development Company June 15, 1988 Page 3 IV, ANALYSIS: Staff is concerned that Lewis Development will be Set Ting the stage for 'a future median island break with the Proposed realignment of the driveway. As previously described above, the proposad driveway I=Ition would align with the existing driveway for the Virginia Dare Ginter, A median island break at this location would be at only oral- eighth of a mile (660 feet) frbn the next opening instead of the standard one- quarter mile separation (1304 feet). The General Plan, as adopted by the City Council, restrict.* median island breaks to approximately one- quarter mi;ie spacings (1300 feet) on the major dividgi a;•ts=,rials. This critical spacing roy.:?_remc-nt ii the result of extensive traffic studies done for the preparation Of the General. Flan and the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is it;dicated in those studies and documents as being particularly important and critic,31 o;t Haven Avenue. These documents also strofss the ivportance;of maintaining the capacity of the Foothill - Haven intersection. This will be possible only through keeping other- traffic conflicts a5 far away from the intersection as is possible and feasible, Right-turn-only driveways are the most interference that can be tolerated in the critical area within 1000 -1200 fleet of Foothill Boulevard, where four lanes of traffic on northbound Haven Avenue must be squeezed back to'. three. A traffic signal within this merging area would result n congestion extending back through the Foothill Boulevard intersection and would be a source of increased accidents. In addition, the City is completing an extensive median island beautificat,as project along haven Avenue. The median openings havo already bRen constructed consistent: with the iityrs General Plan. Any additional median openings would reduce the remaining median to a 4 -foot wide rock strip with one small pocket of vegetation near Town Center Drive. An unsolicited traffic report from Lewis Development Company, some time ago, stated that the additional median island break ;could have no significant effect on the ability to coordinate signal operation along Haven Avenue. This report, however, Only examined the aspect Of signal coordination and failed to address the equally important effects on the merging traffic flows and accidents. A median opening would also r Potential ui in reithe increase removal of approximately 1200 feet of recently installed median landscaping, which is approximately 54% of the full width portion between Foothill Boulevard and Town Center Drive (Exhibit %,,), la, 11 `M CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CUP 88 -12 - Lewis Development Company June 15, 1988 Page 4 If Lewis Devo'lopment Company feels it is necessary to realign the driveway, staff would recommend relocating the ' "S" curve to the south (Exhibit ".H ") This would give the drivers a positive sigk, distance as they enter from Haven Avenue, rather than the limited sight distance shown on the Lewis proposal, The City has been consistent in its planning and construction of median openiggs on Haven Avenue. Staff is .opposed to any additional median openings in this or any other section of Haven Avenue where median islands have been planned or constructed, These medians are consistent with the design standards .promulgated by the Traffic Engineering Profession as published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, The State Department of Transportation (CalTrans) and The National Highway Research Board (NHRB). Respectfully submitted, RHM:JS:sd Attachments:- Vicinity Map (Exhibit "Al") Proposed Driveway (Exhibit "B"") Approved Site Plan (Exhibit "C'") General Plan Excerpt (Exhibit "D"" Original Master Plan (Exhibit "E ") Terra Vista Plan (Exhibit 'IF") Median OpeniC, 1 �cxhibit "G "') Alternate Driveway (Exhibit "H ") Note: Staff received another Traffic Report from Western Properties on Wednesday afternoon, June 8, 1988, and was unable to review it prior to this writing. However,- staff Will be able to address the report by the City Council Meeting of June 15, 1988. (,x °l3 f 9;� r.L f� PZ r � T x I L 440 t Z zd: 6 v Ln * T �IIIII��II�G�i Z O 08 V r N � A ! 4 � V ,.tu J l / � ® i jr `. wx C. IJ G N i / z a µ\o- 1 n i 3 A tl N� Y M .il rS i AQ I�Q 1 9 +taus, Q. � t+ eIR S c ui _ -M.a.m .�y -Om �� $Z_o —EZ?7a yGNE L'�3� Lc c y','n�• uj .> O O L m d m N O •. +0 T ca O v c N L 6= M L c iS °, L. O p. O. m a ro O' M B G .°+ v .- V N ,V N,°n wa'Eo° ti a—Ic d c C. 4. OL ca 7 a m E o Q ro "a '" s o M m Ea'; 2. r C C Ci 2 � � ' ` ro -0 rs C � t' L = al O u o -= ° a> u d V'n E o N= u m o m N Er c J Lo— � _^ u>i« v w 7 a 3 1 C ai u- ro u o E.2 o c� > u_ o cW a v ° u ° v ro ~ N our GU�O C_ °C�.; �rCC C T+� O L C O o'! °. L. ,O .+ y y c C {,, C;S (M MI E A O O a d LT L U C W d O g7 O 6t Q ,02 c N .� a ') d N Cl L p i,} m w C N :4i. G—�L > O d i y to 03 O d CL GyO u W N9LJ. N 1V .G N.d 8_ O CL 0. 3m'° �:,0� N E m N GAO d L O t G ° g M b 0 O C p 0 Q O u° Hw c .c .. t. %- N AM yA L go 6 .� > G u o a C �c� ma �Y r N E of C L .0 r 23 >, A. 41 •A �vvC� .°+N�. °N.3 .0.09,...: ,. �E3 N Lc u =Uv L R. �f.C7. u p,N � N E L �' N a y �... a�:� M0oE �E � way t. a, r O CCjt pr a oo Ngoa a Wd c0` >OS C 87 U aU 4s G c 0 X 2 Q Q X,� _ -c-� -12 e z 0 0 ov s � 4 a 'r f' M2 A f r.s r e z 0 0 ov s � 4 14 0-n l Wry A _¢ g o yN V K O� Z Ln o Oy w z �%9 a IA a!" LI al I' Z, I e e tl� O F Eui flu a Lu X m Q 14 0-n l Wry A _¢ g o yN V K O� Z Ln o Oy w z �%9 a IA a!" LI al I' Z, I e e tl� O AOL TOwR-j r R.DR, CL 0. !1i Ln IAJ 1 � I fy i L LJ I J 1 Wo` " ai3 cnC, u xd vyi +a VI Q (z to 01 of M Ze ui LV/ to £� Q3�T ui r—r 2 LLJ w � � 2 Ld u W U 7 z Cj _FOOrHl�tL. ewD. - - FOOTFi ! —77-11 LL r LV f) I I uj ,t MJ c I TA; I w . ,Z tU A 2 r } AP aaELJ f ,UrA .,l QR I PROPOSED. TARGE Z A LTERNArp- i.lj > p j e } o C ci re rAL M f • v V � 1 CUP , -12 Trm& A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING MOUIFICATION NO. 1, TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. , 88-12 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN INTEGRATED COMMUNITY SHQPPM CENTER +CONSISTING OF FOUR 'MAJOR RETAIL BUILDINGS TOTA41NG 3335,000 SQUARE FEET, WOINTNG MALL SHOPS TOTALING,'42,228 SQUARE FEET, MINE SATE °,LITE RETAIL BUILDINGS TOT /,LING 42,500 SQUARE FEET, M SATELLITE OFFICE BUILDAGS TOTALING 25,822 SQUARE FEET, FOUR RESTAURANT PADS, AND A 30,000 SQUARE FOOT THEATER. CONCEPTUAL APPROVAL FOR A DESIGN CENTER CONSISTING OF TEN BUILDINGS TOTALING 195,660 SQUARE FEET. ALL ON 71 ACRES OF LAND IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT OF THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY LOCATE& AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD - APN. 1077 -421 - 05, 06a 13. A. Recitals, (1) Western Properties has filed an application for the issuance of the Modification to Conditional Use Permit No. 88 -12 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application". (ii) On the 22nd of dune, 5488, the Planning Commission of the City j of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of th's Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: I. 'This Cow- fission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on dune 22, 1988, inclexding written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard with a street frontage of #2700 feet and lot depth of 11440 feet and is presently unimproved= and PLANNING'cowissroN RESOLUTION NO. CUP 88 -12 - Western Properties June 22, 1988 Page 2 -" (b) The property to the north of the subject site is vacant land, the property to the south of that site consists of an office complex, the property to the west is an entertainment /office complex; and th,^ Hroperty to the east is vacant 72nd. 3. Based upon the sub tantial evidence presented to this Conasission during the shove- referenced public hearing and upon the 'findings specific of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above,. this Commission hereby finds and conclude^ ar follows: (a) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and (b) That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the 'Development Code, the Terra Vista Community Plan and the purposes of the district in whici;;the site is located; and (c) That the proposed use is in = zompiiance with each of -the applicable provisions of the Development Code and Terra Vista Community Plan; and (d) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or Materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. , 4. Tk:s C"ission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Qurlity Act of 1970 ,and, further, a Negative Declaration was issued on December 9, 1987 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Comisssion hereby approves the modification to Resolution No 88 -75 and Conditional Use Permit 88 -12 as follows.: (a) Revised building square footages as described in the title of this Resolution; and (b) Revised building footprint and architectural details for Major 2 Building and A; and (c) The following conditions of Approval shalt be added to Section 5 of Resolution 88 -75: (25) A; 10 foot setback shall be maintained between the e adway curb and the building face at the northeast corner of Major 2. (26) No less than 35 parking spaces shall be provided within thi 'vicinity of the northeast wiener of ,Building 2. PLANNIF!( COF01ISSION RESOLUTION NO CUP 8P=12 .R Uestern Properties June✓ i'' <, 19883 Page 3i AAk d S. The Deputy Secretary 'to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 1988, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCRO CUCMONGA BY: Larry -T: e a rman ATTEST: ra u er, Deputy Secretary - I I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of;tly Plans:-,Comnissio� of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify thbZ the foregoing Resolution was du)Y anal regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Counission f ,he City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commissii,._.�'eld on the 22nd day of June, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit; AYrS: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMISSIONERS — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 22, 1988 T0: Chairman and Members of t e Planning Commission FROM: Willipm L?. Silva, Deputy City Engineer BY: Joe Stofa, Jr., Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 9897 (MODIFIED) - Wes eE �Irro,, ea�r �ies - A sub uision o acres o an o dree s Inthe Terra Vista Planned Community, located on the southeast corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway (APN 1077- 421 -06, ],077 - 091.17) I ' I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: f A. Action Requested: Approval of the proposed Tentative Partel Map as I sown on Exhibit "I" B. Parcel Size: Parcel 1 5,37 Acres Parcel 2 3.12 Acres Parcel 3 - 4.10 Acres C. Existing Zoning: Planned Community - Office Park D. Surrounding Land Use: l North - Residential South Vacant East - Vacant Test - Vacant E. Surrounding General Plan and Development Code Designations: North - Residential South - Office Park East - Residential West - Office Park ITEM H PLANNT_NO COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PM9897 Western Properties June 22, 1988 Page 2 F. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant and slopes approximately to the—southeast. II. ANALYSIS: This site was previously approved as a 1-lot Parcel. Map by the Planning g Commission on December 10, 1986, but it was never recorded. Lewis Development requests the modification of Parcel Map 9897 to create 3 separate lots for the Master Planned Terra Vista Business Park which. was approved in February 24, .1988, as CUP 86 -20. The parcel lines in relationship ti the approved pt ",oject site plan are shown on Exhibit "C". All public streets adjacent to the entire site will be constructed full width to City Standards upon development of any parcel, 141n addition, staff is recommending extending Town Center Drive to Haven Avenue, as a secondary access (Exhibit "D "). III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The applicant completed Part I of the initial to y. Staff con ucted a field investigation and completed Part IT of the Initial Study. No adverse impacts upon the environment: are anticipated as a result of this prtJect. Therefore, issuance of Negative Declaration is appropriate. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been completed. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input and elements of the Tentative Parcel flap. If after such consideration, the Commission can recommend approval, then the adoption of the attached 'Resolution and issuance of a Negdt }ye Declaration would , be appropriate. Respect�� submitted, ilN liam J. Silva, P.E., J Deputy City Engineer j WJS:JS :sd I Attachments: Vicinity Map (Exhibit "A ") Tentative Map (Exhibit "8 ") Master Plan (CUP 86 -20) (Exhibit "C ") Off -site Street Improvements (Exhibit "D ") Resolution and ! Recommended Conditions of Approval I j f / -, rAple9w a 1 r a®cssr we • .r• CITY OF TMX- PARIS L. MAP $p-q-7 GItriEAMG DrmioN R ,r T ' N TAT I V Ie . :PARCEL, MAP N ? I� U' I= CM OV *A*C;o epCAMOMMA. ,2U. , . lea —AUGU&T-to" aaas >•ea r ama.er. maw.. w® t, n as rwra e. �.. °!/ r *^,v asss i �4 ��xi'rf °3amEr...�f , /"�� ----- �_' ''t' -i ice• _ o y 03'� �.�� •� 7 2. tits Crrf OF RANCHO • EN("D&MMO DIMON :�►� ®DI F f �8� Imo: PARMEL MAP U17 TfML-'VF-N-TAfrj,fF- MAP }ef'j EX Mii•b N( /Ij /f Ii N r` CFFY OF NCHO CUCAMONGA ENGDWMMG moN nzw �IIML MAP 0 "5 ilk.,_ I �sapI �- ° +a wo I9 Lit 6i p Lm -T LU oil Lm II L� Leo �. `w L l LK -11 Sine 4 ac t LINT cc, Go { I i� IN* 1 C LE— O�NDc PROJECT STATUS In Process P G Approved ® Recorded Pinaled V STREET STATUS am" x�i Mg Pavemnt Required for this Project I !cul-t wil1TN , i VCL. fir!_ f CIW OF RANCHO �UCAMONGA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CINDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 9897,AODIF ED) A WNERIAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 9897 (Noa!fied), submitted by Western ?;,lerties, applicant, for the p4;Pa,e of subdividing into 3 parcels, the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of," ;n Beenardino, State of California, identified a'- APN(s) 1077421 -.06 and 1077 - 091 -117, located on the southeast corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway; and WHEREAS, an June 22, 3388, the Manning Commission held a duly advertisf,d public bearing for the above - described map, FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE, THE : iANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS SECTION 1: ,Aat the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent witty the General Plana qP 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdi- ,ision is consistent with the General Plan, 3. That the site is physically suitsble for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial onvironmentai damage, public he?A th problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: This Commission finds and certifies t'iat the project has been reviewer aaRT - considered in compliance with the ritliforlid Enviromflen -c31 quality Art of 1970, and further, this C'Mission tereby 1.;sues a Negative Declaration. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 9897 (Modified) is hereby approved suffjecl to the attached Standard Condi'jons and the fol' owing Special Conditions:. 1. The Developer shall construct line 1-3 and a portion of line I of the Terra Vista Master Plan of Drainage from tt site to Deer Creek Channel or provide an alternate drainage disposal solution as j approved by the City Entline any buildings. r pl*io ° to occupancy of l r i �{ F { RESOLUTION NO. Page 2 2. The following streets shall be constructed full width for the stated limit with the development of any parcel except that offsite sidewalk and parkway landscaping may be deferred until development of the adjacent property: . a. Town Center Drive from Haven Avenue to Eln Avenue; b. Terra Vista Parkway'i•rom Church Street to Town Center Drive, including a landscaped mediae.; c. Church Street from Haven Avenue to Elm Avenue, including landscape mediae:, and d. Elm Avenue frob Church Street to Town Center Drive, including full improvements for t+e f YPiE 8" trail per the Terra Vista Community P E. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22AD ?AY OF JUNE, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: f Larry T. McN i e , Chairman - - ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary' I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the 'Planning Coasmission of the- City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and reguiarly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular nseeting.'of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day June, 1988, of by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS, a r YAC U O g s M 1; KI 'Original Poor Quality a-'i' Vj G G r �yyyyy A * M O M M $ s' zn K► + ' -34 F C ° w+ S T lil fJ j _ IS 1 i Z� * w 3 s y w x Z24= � se g z 4yy° tl� � ya aaEyV. N !f ° Aj Y i we w + ' -34 F �° IS 1 Z� * w 3 s y w x Z24= � se g z 4yy° tl� � ya aaEyV. N !f O 4` (� E Y p_ E u qru y A ®� W" lI v e z cr 2- p L a ^,� Y V � �. E �. N p 0,. � n a w «� -G� e M v oG. ASTe 1 L 559x! 4 ` ° a� ;,g aQN 3 8g"C e1 >Ei dpa �� se p �1 Y =p QQL..Y pLY k, 8 YS `j, rwn�$ i N qe p i ��ppY ppYYVp C e � .l Y. rr ^^ MWA VCY �M NO 01y i NV N °$ Sb .ems M eL YMVA 5y d- G Aw p Vy3 lz �• llw $ ia6i C C Y 6L y L. Y NSF O;IWWL V Iy Y. W a u py V 44� Yii YX �_S iL'e �s S ££"c° .•.Eli iH sy, i �� N 1'! ♦ N � r N. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ,)ATF.: June 22, 1988 -0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commissior� FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Miki Bratt, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIROKWENTAL AS &3SMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. rust roper es - ji A reques o amen the L rcu a io 1 E1e_Me_nj--o7—'fhe' General Plan to widen Cherry Avenue from the intersection of 24th Street (existing Summit Avenue) to Interstate 15 from a collector to a secondary arterial with an 100 foot right -of -way and to widen 24th St1�eet- east -of- the -loop, (existing Summit Avenue) to an 110 foot right -of -way. (2) Amend the Master Plan of Trails of the General Plan to relocate the trail on the south. side of 24th Street, east -of- the - loop, east -of -the- oop,Aalong)the northerly City boundary Street, delete a portion thereof. E�NVMONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN reques o Wnd t a wan a pecr c Plan zo widen Cherry Avenue from the intersection of 24th. Street (existing Summit Avenue) to Interstate 15 from a collector to a secondary arterial with an 110 foot right -of -way and to widen 24th vicinity of the t ntersectioniwithgCheSummit i Avenue)gto a 110 foot right -of -way. (2) Amend the Master Plan of Trails to relocate the trail on the south side of 24th Street, east- of-the-loop, (existing Summit Avenue) to the north side of 24th Street, east -of- the -loop, along the northerly City boundary and to delete a portion thervof. I. ABSTRACT: The original amendment to the Circulation Element of the enera Plan and to the Etiwanda Specific Plan for Cherry Avenue' was initiated by First Cities Properties (Exhibit "A ", Location). However, because Cherry Avenue, as well as the Loop Road and 24th Street, east of the Loop Road (Summit Avenue), will be important entryways to the City, the Planning Commission has requested special landscaping with median islands for these three roadways which would require additional right -of -way. (Exhibit "C" and "D ") 1 i __jl PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GEUERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -028 June 22, 1988 Page First Cities Properties has also requested amendment to the trails mad (Exhibit "B" Location). They request deletion of the trail`' sec0 on eastward along 24th Street, (Summit Avenue) frota the propoty boundary at Sat•. Sevaine Wash to the I -Eo Freeway because they ati routing the link ►nth the regional east -west equestrian trail thviugh the Hunter's Ridge-project. Along 24th Street i(Summit Avenue) in the vicinity of San Sevaine Wash, it is vecommended that the equestrian trail be located on the northside of the street. p To make these changes in the Circulation Element of the General Plan and in the Etiwanda Specific Plan, the attached resolutions should be adopted. f II. BACKGROUND: The original application to amend the Circulation =e`nt of the General Plan was readvertised at the request of the Planning Commission to consider the following changes (Exhibit "E" [ and "F"): j o Widen. Cherry Avenue from 24th Street east of the Loop, from a collector to a secondary arterial with a right -of -way road suction of 110 feet. o Wlu'en 244th Street east of the Loop (Summit Avenue), from a collector to a secondary arterial with a right -of -way road sectTon of 110 feet. The purpose of increasing the right -of -way for Cherry Avenue (Figure 5 -36); for 24th Street, east of the L-op (Figure 5 -35); and for the Loop Road (Figure 5 -34) is: (See Exhibit "C" and "D ") o Provide width for the addition of a landscaped median island in each road; o Through the use of landscaping and. other means, create an adequate gateway statement for a major entrance into the City, l the Etiwanda Community and the Worth Etiwanda Community. III. ANALYSIS: MEDIAN ISLANDS: Engineering staff has reviewed the above proposals an" d recommends installation of 14 -foot median islands In Cherry Avenue (Figure 5 -361; in 24th Street east of the Loop (Figure 5- 35); and th) Loop (Figure 5 -34). (See Exhibits "C" and "D ")'. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -028 June 22, 1988 Page 3 Cherry Avenue (Figure S-361 would be expanded to include 64 feet 0 paving, a median island, and additional parkway landscaping for a total 110 -foot right -of- -way. 1 The applicant ��as identified the flood control facilities on the west side of Cherry Avenue as a possible constraint to constructing the roadway, median island, sidewalks and parkway to the full 110 - foot r=ight -of -way width. These issues are being reviewed' by the Engineering Division and any problems or constraints can be resolved prior to approval of an actual construction project. San Bernardino County Flood Control District has been asked to comment on the proposal a „d their staff, is reviewing optic -s. One possibility w::ald be to move the centerline of Cherry Avenue to the east in that portion of Cherry Avenue where the flood control F facilities cannot be modified. Since the minimum width for a median island is, 14 feet and the minimum pavement for the predicted lev4l of traffic would. be 64 feet, therefore, the only flexibility is in the width of the sidewalks and landscaped parkways. A. narrower parkway and deletion of the sidewalk on the west side of Cherry avenue adjacent to the flood control facilities could also reduce the width of the right - of -way. 24th Street, east of LooR Road (Figure 5 -35) is currently planned or a right-OF-4—ay—off 96 fee . In order to accommodate a median island, right -of -way should be increased to 110 feet. The Loop Road (Figure 5 -34) is 414rrently Manned for a right -of -way, of ee . A median island can be c,,`Qd without increasing; the right -of -•way, if the landscaped parkway is reduced on each side of the roadway. Planning staff supports the inclusion of the landscaped median islands for the ebove roads as an appropriate visual link between the 24th Street Parkway and the major City entry at the intersection of the I -15 Freeway and Cherry Avenue. (See Exhibit "Dn ) . Trails: The Trails Committee reviewed this proposal at their meting of June 15, 1488, but comments were not available in time to be included in this staff report but will be reported at the Planning Commission Nearing. The trails rtap (Ex; -ibit "B ") shows - olanned trail extensions. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -028 June 22, 1988 Page # One extension is a continuation of the City Community Trail Syste" along the west side of San Sevaine Wash as part of the Etiwanda Highlands Planned Community. 'e other extension travels north on the east side of San Sevaine t!h as part of the Hunter`3 Ridge Planned Community in the City Gf Fontana. The latter trail connects to an east west extension of the County Regional Trail System and also lints with the Equestrian Trailhead planned within the Hunter's Ridge Community. The Hunter's Ridge Regional Trail Plan replaces the planned extension along the I -a Freeway,_ IV. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: An environmental a�sessn•,enit has been -by-s-tUT, con, ple e -d No adverse effects have been Identified as a consequence of amending the General Plan or the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Therefore, the Planning Commission should recommend approval of a Negative Declaration under the California Environmental Quality Act. V. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The following findings can be made; ,a) The amendment does not conflict O th the Circulation policies' of the General Plan or of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and (b) The amendment promotes the goals of the Circulation Element of the General Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and (c) The amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties, VI. RECOMMENDATION: If the Planning Commission agrees Witt) the above Facts or ndings, the Planning CoMmission should adopt the attached resolutions;in support of the amendment to the Circulation Element of the General Plan and amendment to the Etiwanda Specific Plan. ly; tted, AResc er BB :MB:mlg I° PLANNIUM C` '-:41I5SION STAFF REPORT GENEP,P'` PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -028 June(: , 1988 page. , Attachments: Exhibit "At�" Y` location Map - streets { Exhibit "$" —ation Map Trails Exhibit C.��ry Avenue Exhibit "t�" - 24 `F ,Street, East of the Loop and the Loop 24th Steet;z�d ZT15 Exhibit "E" - Planning tcibiission Staff Report of May 25, 1988 Exhibit "F" - Planning Jo"Asion Minutes of May 25, 1988 Resolution Recommending p�provai of General Plan Amendment 88 -020 1 Resolution Recommending Approval of Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 88 -01 I I ' I �,_ 24 vN i/� �A, [� i PROwerT :A.REA� �•� ROM Mti3.AP4 AVE � / il 14V % freeway Access NOW Major Arterial 1r , f Secondary Arterial f "gin Special Design i� '°' jj �t� - Collector nj Local streets g1 EIIWANDA SPECIFIC MAN ^� CITY OF STREET SYSTEM ffEM: GPA 88 -026 Fsp W-4I TITLE. LOC&TAa MAP -STRi~ErS �.Ai'`t IIIVG D[dL EXH[Brr- -._.-� SCSIE N ti E 24 TH igv6u- PROTECT AREA --.,� I 14UMTF.R,,S\ RIDGE PROTECT NIX 7 5pp— DELE-TF-/ TF-AILI SEC.TfO&. LOB 0 Equestrian Trails Sks Lane (in Pavement) path (in Par*iw,,%%,,) ARVW NMH CITY OF ITEM, CPA M- OZJs:rs RA.NCFD CILCAIMONGA "rrrLE, RANNING Dj%rLWW SCALE: -h!O—tOF-- r'.O�,VERING R.EES TACARMIM .•��.i CHERRY AVENUE FIG. 5 --36 CIPI OF RANCHO CL'C►4 rtk PLANNING D(VLSi )N ITF,n SPA 86•QZ& Est? 8•� TITLE= KERRY AVE EXHIBIT - I ` SCALE, NONE 2) J- s I ET!WANnA '•w-vrt -win ®t AN LOGE B*twa *jl 24th and 1 -13 PROPOSED FI CE -, 5— 24TH, STREET. tut of Lo" NORTH PROPOSED FIG. ScmU *ITY OF 'TE rt�� 466P PLANNING DIVISION �. T_R £,XF{tt3tT =--fL SG%! E - U006 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �-. STAFF REPORT l DATE: May 25, 1988 ('0: Chairman h,"d Hembers of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Plant,rir BY: Miki Brt,tt, Associate Minflner SUBJECT: ENVIROWMENTAL ASSESS MT AND GENERAL ?ALAN AMENDMENT 88 -028 - FIiST CITY F.UM",rr - request to amen e ircu a on ETe en o he General Plan to widen Cherry Avenue from Sumimit Avenue (24th Street) to Interstate 15 frog a collector to a secondary arterial with an 88 foot right -of -way road section; and (2) to amend the Mast)r Plan of Trails of the General Plan to relocate the. trail on the south side of Summit Avenue to the north of Summit Avenue alc; the easterly City boundary. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMCN't Ai ;►' ETI'riANDA SPECIFIC PLAN - M3T-C7T7-P'R0PERTII"5 = 'Tl amen e-Ef to the Etlwanda Specitic ME to -w en Cherry Avenue from Sttmnit Avenue (24th Street) t�, Interstate 15 from a rrllector to a seco Aary arterial with an 88 foot right- (f-way road section, and (2) to amend the Cormunity Trails -flap of the Etiwanda Specific Plan to relocate the trail on the south side of Summit Avenue to the north of Summit Avenue along the easterly City boundary. I� ABSTRACT: These applications request amendment to the Circulation amen of the General Plan and to the Etiwanda Specific Plan to widen the ultimate right -of -way to 88 feet for Cherr* w anue and Summit Avenue, as well as to make slight adjustments in the regional equestrian trail system. This action will serve to resolve certain °1gai obligations on the part of the applicant resulting from the annexation of the Punt Club property by the City of Fontana. Based on traffic p ojections for development of the Hunt Club property as defined by the Hunter's Ridge Specific Plan and environmental review, staff supports the proposals. However, -5ased an review of the future devni'opmect of the area as a major entry into the City, staff recommends designation of Cherry Avenue between t'!- I -15 Freeway interchange and St-ayt Avenue as a 'special highway and reromtmmds increasing th6 ultimate right -of- way to 110 feet in order to provide for ap^priate candscaping. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GNA 88- 02B /ESPA 88 -01 - FIRST CITY PROPERT3E; May 25, 1939 Page .2 if the Planning Commission concurs with the staff recommendation, the item will need to he readvertisad and brought for publ ;c hearing at the Jane 22, 1988 Planning Commission meeting. II. LOCATION: The application site is located in the vicinity of Summit venue and Cherry Avenue in the northeastern portion of the City (see Exhibit "1 "). General Plar: land uses are: North - Single Family Residential, City of Fontana, Hunter's Ridge Specific Pt',, South - Food Contrr East - -nti: Low (loss than 2 dwelli,g units per specific Plan; (a proposal to change to tat tieing o - ,3sed byithe�phropertyownerjl and Office West - F,iod Cantioi III. BACKGROUND: This request by First C'ty Properties is proposed to imp emen the settlement agreement betsreen the City of Fontana and the City of Rancho Cucamonga on annexation and development of thr Hunt Club property. The development mown as Hunter's Ridge i; located in the City of Fontana, north of the City limits of Cucamonga along Summit Avenue and east of the Seen Sevaine W The proposal is baser fj6 traffic and circulation studie, 0. -ted for the Punter's iidge Specific Plan and Environmentai impact Report. These studies indicate that at bui dout, the project will generate ;,-,,ore than 24,600 vehicle trips per day. Iii order to handle tue increased traffic, planned street designations for Cherry Avenue must be increased. Therefore, the applicant is requEsting that the existing deOgcation for Cherry Avenue and for Summit Avenue be changed fr-a re;iMntial collector 'Ee foot right- of-wry) to secondary arterial ?",d leot ri<;;;t -of -way), IV. ANALYSIS: Seraral Issues need to be =r sidered, including traffic, aE Mc setting, ti :99 of improvements. and maintenance of 13ndscaping in the riy':t- of-way. ?i+ese issues are presented as follows; k A. Traffic: Engineering stay., supports the change in designation Tr=on 'Collector to secondary arteri,%l in order to ;andl a the increased trK'eic which n;il be generated by the Hunter's Ridge project (sue ExieibitJ "2" w,.nd "31. B Aesthetic SQL, Avenue and Summit Avenue Will be eastern entr ei of Rancho Cucamonga. The applicant, will imp." tr:g Summit Avenue in a manner consistent with City s ., �, cons s elf —Of 'the Etiwanda Specific Plan with 20 feet die Jscaoina on the north side of the roadway within the City ).' Kontana (see Exhibit 'W). PLANNING CfM USSION STAFF REPORT GPA 88- 02B /ESPA 88 -01 - FIRST CITY PROPERTIES m,yY cg, 1988 Page 3 - %ugh the improvements to Cherry Aveiwe betwe ^n existing Sunrnit Avenue and the I -15 F'reew�fercfiange ,meet traffic con�,'derations, they fall short cf an ae,sthetic setting fnr Gateway entry to the City. The EtiwL'nda Specific Fian identifies the intersp.ction of Cherry Avenue and the I -15 "reeway as a City Gateway. Cherry Avenue and 24th Street are the travel paths for the gateway. Accordingly, 2140. Street is -iasignatcd as a special parkay design d under the "unifying theme" of the Etiwacda Specific Plan. To be consistent with the specie; treatment of Gatetaays and the "unifying theme" of the Etiwanca Specific Plan, Cherry Avenue should also be designated as cr special. s4r.at. Also, within �^ tfunter's Rage project, Cherry Avenue will be develop id to a 110 foot right -of -way including landscaping and median divider (see Exhibit "5 "). Therefore, in order to provide an appropriate sc-tting for a Gateway entrance to the N ty and to be consistent with surrouneing development, staff recommends that Cherry Avenul be treated as a Special Secandairy a terial with a 64 foot paved section, a a4 foot median, and 32 feet of landscaping with 5 foot sidewalk sections on both sides �p or a total 110 foot right -of -way designation (see Exhibit o ). C. Tim'. of�Im Improvements. According to the Hunter's Ridge 79R! —r 'tic Plan and environmental mitigation measures, StMi Aveno::e will be improved with Phase I c- instruction of the project. Improvement of the City portion of Summit Avenue will be made by -the developer with ftature reimbursement by the City. The Specific Plan and eavironm:ntal mitigation measures also stated that for off -site improvements, Cherry Avenue should be improved to four lanes in accord M th traffic demand. The project traffic engineer calculates that demand for four travel lanes on Cherry Avenue will a cur when 1,1Jb residential units have been occupied. it is further stated that upor completion of Cherry Avenue improvements, another 700 units may be occupied. the completion of Cherry Avenue improvements would approximately correspond to buildcit of Phase I at 1,6554 units. However, the Fontana City Council, at staff's suggestion, did alter this mitigat` {on measure from ocraUpancy to building permit issuance and made a determination that maintenance wood be the applicant's responsibility. E3 E2 r ;.1 n PLANNING C"TSSIOR STAFF REPORT GPA B9- O2B /1ZSVA 88 -01 - FIRST CITY PROPERTIES May 25, 1988 Page 4 D. Maintenance of Landscaping in the Right -of -Way: For mprove en s o uW 7{y AR w n1n tffe- city of Fontana, landscape maintenance wil•1 be provided by a landscape, righting, and maintenance distri::t. At this time, no provision for maintenance of landscaping for improvements within Rancho Cucamonga havi been made. However, it is anticipated that the City and developer will reach an agreement on landscape maintenance prior to issuance of permits for street improvements. E. Amendment to the Trails ft: The proponent is proposing to relocate a section of designated trail to the north side of Summit Avenue. this section would connect with improvements to the regional trail system which t,`ge proponents will "anstruct within the City of Fontana along the San Setaine k.sh on the west boundary of the project. Accordingly, the section of the trail east of San Sevaine Wash would be deleted. Staff has no objections to the relocation of t:,,e trail to the Borth side of the right -of -way and deletion of the portion, of the trail along Summit Avenue which will be re- routed through the Hunter's Ridge project. (see Exhibits "7" and "8 "). V. ENVIRONMENTAL: In cunjunc�,ion with the rnpp,ication, an Initial '9iv re m nary Environmental Assessment, it cr-.4ormity with the rerairements With the California Environmental Quality Act, has been prepat,d and the proposal would have no significant adverse effect on- the environment. Therefore, the Planning Commission may make a finding of no Significant impact on the environment and recommend certification of a Negative Declaration. Vi. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recomnem.. oublic hcaring discussion of the propose.Gene ral plan and EtiwpaoL, Specific Plan Amendments, If the Planning Commission agrees th�r'the right -of- way for Cherry Avenue should be 110 -feet, tle item will neeu to be readvert45ed and brought back for public hearing at the June 22, 1918 meeting of the Commission. Re, full; nitj , 8, d 8 City nner BB :MB:te Attachments: Exhibit "1" - Location Map Exhibit 112" - Summit Avenue Existing and Proposed Sections Exhibit "3" - Cherry AVenue Existing and Proposed Sections Exhibit IWI - Summit Avenue Landscaping Sections Exhibit "S" - Cherry Avenue Landscaping Sections Exhibit "6" Staff Recommended Cherry Avenue Concept Exhibit "7" E.S.p. Existing Community Trails Exhibit "8" - Proposed Tti't Plan /r� E TI WARIDA BF'EC1FIC PLAN OVERALL PLAN CONCEPT 2. HUNTURN :gam �W31 RtQC�E "E y X PROTECT AZEA AflK L i _ � oe O �[fli G MO(ghbcrk.Ood IF Commercial Comm. Aec ary A / ell, Ma Or Road (--7 Communliv Trail �_._i Densdep tial c FOOtel,L Mn Higher ¢�f Foothill blvd. S.P. AAru71K 4 ' QI , CITY p MEM: SPA_ 9-9 - ®2a MA ss -ol ` E4 TnU:- ILOCP�TIL�t��. EP ►. _ .l IJIEKJ EXHIBIT: — I - LE: �`a,17A-UA EXISTING CONDI TIONS r- r�s�u� -mot 1 elo-e 4- t.N 2a' t 7ZA/f- lV GAG RELOCATED �c'E�3 /18lT�/ GENERAL PLAN/ETI t NDA SPECIFIC PLAN CITYa r atreae ookirwo MUM<^ PROPOSED STREE g SECTION SUMMIT AVENUE (24TH STREET) CITY OF PLANNING DjVjSM,, , If IT. LE: Tj� -rte L .ems Ex�r �- le /w -- .35' rd' i ad• � 2d. � / EXISTING CONDITI ON ae�w Eirl PAMD A Sp�:GIFIG PLAN CMLEC TOR c / , 1 /L' I LA 'moor fZWO& 9uhu 14 *'AVE' fZ f,2§rRW f rfl�et/!!t/�WdlAl�'/ FD, j4g5Nr%M:7 lCr4lcs 'SHERRY AVENUE (SUM MM M AVENUE TO IN'TERS'TATE 9 5) CITY OF E'1..i#IVYI'*1t;"�ICi Di VISION ;Tat. -CFA 813 - AM CSR c2ff :QQ� TITLE= _C8ERRY A 'gnu EXHIBIT: - SCALE: —R-OME . J'-- 6 to FUTURE PARKW/ 4' 91'lDE lu SUMMIT AVEMU HUPTEWS PlZGE DIASITE SeCTION1 MY OF (TEM. TITLE= PLANNING DIWSM EXHINT= -4—SCALE. MOMS: r W LL 1 U AL 196T,T tC� H SIDES OF STAEE MEANOERYNo JA401t,,, PATjt J WALXWAy COMMUNITY THEME W qLi L an 1 7 g�{ - Fj- WA" EAL Sol" gM F 4irErn (-60MWoty VM* WALL i - Paia,aya 8 MAY""— '—"" --s +N61.Md 9fi�fi;.�Nit r-HE.RRY AVENUE 4U1�7EtS RIDGE. ONSITE SECTIpk, CITY t RANCHO CL)CAIWX.4CA l "t'E1vE' GDA SS -01 ' nANNING QvISM VTLE. _ T lu PROPOSED CVALR .Y ptvEMLiE CIOMCEpr FROM - SUMMIT AVENUE TO 1-15 STAFF RECOMIEMDATION WV,�.,AG F- -s ACARAMDA I CTS' OF ,. ITENt —QjPA 88-gZ� RANCH CL DQA 88 a TITLED PNEOSEQ NP12',Y Avr MN —CEPT ['i., I`�tN!t�K; a€vts EXHIBIT. f = :F) J-- t ETItrtEANDA SPECIFIC PLAM EVSTING COMM11MITY TKNILS CITE' OF It' Pi.A!`d!`+tM, D(,,' P? �ti6 3�ti1 L1�9G A .0/ m AKEA I t;Osr Munity Tr*j9 ftothl;i b 9d. S.P. y� q�O � .. i �'I 17 MI: SPA 8 TITLE: i` TI1 " k4 jay A1Lg EXHIBIT- -7 SCALE: ----- PRoaEc-r' APNEA\ MOVE TO NaRTlI SIDE �=_ !I NUNTERS�'� OF ,SUMMIT AVE �RIDGE 4 2A IN 9 / ( DELETE: TRAIL_ Woi,rf % SECTIOIII A AVE' AVE � A OLA K ��.�s __ I /,'•��E e6� �• � � •: ;� ;�k�r: W. / / {��- ',�,�.� OCR � C�Cn�C� ✓ / Nei hborhood 91 Commerclat Pt Other J —_ i p�� \� Comm. tFrea-sy o` ; • I4`►��3, de !/ Lam•[ or Road 71 �`; ` ` "�� %! i r Community Trail ' Lrl Luwor- Q 1s' d`• `� � ��•. ,,, � _r Density L / FOOTHKLOLVEI n HigheY l Foothill blvd, J.P. I ! CITY �� rH RVCHO C[C�1CA ITEM: -GPA &R-02A ODA -rrJl j Tfi'l.E: PROPdSED TRAIL. PLAN - �t.ANt�lIIY ?JEi/� EXHIBIT: 8 ALE: C. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -54 - CHIU - The dev vment of a rtstauraatt teta ng 7,174 square feet on 1.2 acres arsd in the lndustriai Park District, Subarea 7, located at the theast corner of Red Oak Street � and Lauren Street - APN; 20$- 351 - #. Motion. Moved by Chitiea, sec ed by Blakesley, unanimously carried, to adopt the Consent Calendar.. !j PUBLIC'HFARINGS 0. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AN" GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -02B - FIRST CITY PROPERTIES - L Tan amendment to tr? Circu ation E ement af`the�on Plan to widcn Cherry Avenue from Summit Avenue (24th Street) to Interstate 15 rrcm a collector to a secondary arterial with an $8' right- of -way road section and amend Summit Avenue to an 88' right-of-way road section. (2) amend the Master Plan of Trailss of the General Plan to relocate the 'trail on the south side of Summit Avenue to the north of Summit Avenue along the easterly City boundary. E. ENVIRONMENTAL, ASSESSMENT AND ETIWAVDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 8It =101 FIRST CITY VR PERTIES - 1 An amendment to the Etiwanda Specific F of n to widen Cherry Avenue from Suri nit Avenue (24th Street) to Interstat.= 16 from a collector to a secondary arterial with -�n 881 right -of -way road section and amend Summit Avenue to an SG *right -of -way road section. (2) Amend the Community Trails Map of the Etiwanda Specific Plan to relo:!ate the trail on the south side of Summit Avenue to the north of Suw%it Avenue along.the easterly City boundary. j Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner, gave a brief overview of the amendraerits. 1 Staff recommended that the Planning Commission continue tf.s public hearing, to June 22, 1988. This would allow time to readvertise the items with an amendment to widen the right- of-Way for Cherry Avenue to 110 feet. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Doug Lyon, 1.2477 IronbarV, Rancho Cucamonga, ask.d the reasoning fov, widening Summit Avenue. William Silva, Deputy City Enr.,:neer, explained that Summit would be widened to its ul A mate right -of -way width to bring it Into consistency with the Etiwanda Sr,Acific Plan. Further, the widening viould enable the street to handle the py- jetted traffic load. Mr. Lyon indicated that this was Isis first exposure to the amendments and he t nad sev,gral questions. f Chairman McNiel suggested that Mr Lyon meet w1th City staf,, prior to the June 22nd Planning Commission meeting wher, the items would be heard in depth. I Planning Commission Minutes -2- May 25, 198$ Ii v Therm were no further puNic comments. Commissioner TolsLuy proposed that as' part of this amendment the Planning Commission consider extending the median from its current termination point at 24th St:'Aet and the Loop Road interbaction. He suggested that the median be extended across 24th Street to Cherry Avenue and that a median also be provided on the Lower Loop Read. He noted that there may be constraints; however, suggested that the Commission direct staff to explore the median Possibilities. The Commission's Concurred with this direction. Motion: Moved by Chitiea: seconded by 8lalcesley, unanimous:,; carried, to continue Environmental Assessment and General Plan Amendment 88 -028 and Ettwanda Specific Plan Amendment 8801 to the Planning Commission meeting of June 22, 1981. F. D jiff Irtul.I lU1V , - _- ........... • uu -vcr% RLJA IA request to amend the and _:?Ise Element of the Gdneral Plan from Medium esidential to Low-Medium Residential on approximately 42.25 acres of lan , located north of :4ighland avenue, 'south of lemon Avenue extension, a'..' west of Deer Creek Channel - APN: 207 - 271 -34 (portion), 41 Iportion�j and 42. G. ENVIRONMr -NTAn Acccccuzm \ r.•. ..._. �u�w,rtut tun - A equeSt tr a °.tend the Dever+' - Desfgration of :tedium R6$idential' ent District approxi�„ately 42,2E acres, ioctia,ted at th *' no th- de f Highland Avenue, south of Lem-in Avenue extension and west of Deer Creek Channel - APN. 201 - 271 -34 (P, •.ion), 41 (po)�tiori , and 42. Dino Putrino, Assistant Planner, przsentet� the staff report. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing.y , Gary Aidveason, 450 Ii iposa, l',, nd, Ca ifoNia, gave an overview of the project.. Mr„ Ar %, - ^vn Cot.:,u.rea with the P solution and Conditions of Apps -wal . \� There were no furl;,_.' ooh,- rents, therefore the public oaring was cl,,.;ed. Commissioner Chitiea, commentej that it was nice to rr . Decrease in density come before the Commission, sese a rE'1Uest a; Planning CC- Aission Killutes 0701 -02 0 6--22 88 PC ;Agenda 3 � of 6 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMeNGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ENVIR6NMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLAN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -ukc: REQUESTING TO AMEND THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN TO WIDEN CHERRY AVENUE FROM 24TH STREET ';SUMMIT AVENUES TO INTERSTATE lay FROM A COLLECTOR STREET TO A SECONDARY ARTERIAL WITH A RIGHT -OF -WAY OF 110 FEET; AND TO DESIGNATE THE ABOVE SECTION OF CHERRY AVENUE, 24TH STREET, EAST OF THE LOOP ROAD, AND LCNER LOOP ROAD AS SPECIAL DFSIGN STREETS. A. Recitals. (i) First City Properties has filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. 88 -028 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On the 22nd of June, 1988 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. ( *'ii) All legal prerequisites to the a:MMtion of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are: true and correct.. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to t "is Commission during the above- referenced meeting on June 22, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) An increase in circulation will occur as a result of development of the Hunter's Ridge project in the City of Fontana. Therefore, public safety requirements necessitate the widening of the described portion of Cherry Avenue from collector street to a secondary arterial. Futhermore, the described section of Cherry avenue, as well as 24th Street, east of the Loop Road (Summit Avenue) and lower Loop 'Road, serve as entryways into the City, and therefore, need special design treatment under the Special Design Street designation. (b) These streets are located adjacent to presently undeveloped land and flood control facilities in the northeast corner of the City. i I �,J --4 I PLANNING COMISSION' RESOLUTION NO. GENEUL PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -02B GENERAL PLAN June 22, 1908 Page 2 (c) This amendment does not conflict with the 'ircltlatinn Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development is a - -inner consistent with the. General Plan and with related development; and (d) This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties aad would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties and a Negative Declaration should be issued, 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during thF above- referenced. public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set for h in paragraph L and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) The amendment does not conflict with the•C,rculation policies of the General Plan; and (b) The amendment promotes the goals of the Circulation Element of the General Plan; znd (c) The a --raiment would not be materially injurious orAft detrimental to the adjacent properties. fit. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered for compliance vith the Californfa Environmental Quality Act of 194 and that a Negative Declaration should be issued. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Claission t�reby resolves that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cuyamonga hereby recommends approval on the 2Cnd day of June, 1988, of General Plan Amendment 88-02B. 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certif.,- to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22M DAY OF JUNE, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. MRIVI , a rman ATTEST: BrZd Buller, Deputy Secretary 1 ! PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ! GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -028 - GENFPX PLAN June 22, 1986 Page 3 I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, da, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a Fegular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22 day of June, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS; ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: qW E RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANC!F) CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL Of ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDME4T 88 =01 TO WIDEN CHERRY AVENUE FROM 24TH STREET (SUMMIT AVENUE) TO INTERSTATE 15 FROM A COLLECTOR STREET TO A SECONDARY ARTERIAL WITH A RIGHT- OF -1JAY OF 110 FEET; AVJ TO DESIGNATE AS SPECIAL DESIGN STREETS THE ABQVE PORTION OF CHERRY AVENUE, AS WELL AS 24TH STREET, EAST OF TNg LOOP ROAD, AND LOWER LODP ROAD (EXHIBITS 1 AND 2); AND TO AMEND THE TRAILS MAP TO RELOCATE A PORtIO0 TO THE NORTH SIDE OF 24TH STREET (SUMMIT AVENUE) AND T)J DELETE A PORTION ALONG 24TH STREET BEGINNING 200 YARD'S WEST OF CHERRY' AVENUE TG THE EASTERN BOUNDARY OF THE CITY ,EXHIBIT 3). A. Recitals. (i) First City Properties has filed an application for Etiwanda Specific Plan kaendment Va. 88-01 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to a, "the application ". (ii) On the 22nd of ,pine, 1988 the Planning Conrnission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conductea a duly noticed public hearing on the application. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Parc A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meetfiq on June 22, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) An increase in circulation will occur as a result of development of the Hunter's Ridge project in the City of Fontana. Therefore, public safety requirements ° %7essitate the widening of the described portion of Cherry Avenue from collector street to a secondary arterial. Futhermore, the described section of Cherry Avenue, as well as 24th Street, east of the Loop Road 4Sazt-nit Avenue). and lower Loop Road, serve as entryways into the City, and therefore, need special design treatment under the Special Design St?,�et designation. 1 P ANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, GE+ERAL PLAN AMDNENENT 88 -01 - ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN June 22, 1988 Page 2 , " (b) These streets are located adjacent to presently undeveloped land and flood r,ontrol facilities in the northeast corner of the City. (c) Th:s amendment does not conflict with the Circulation Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development in a manner consistent with the Genel.fl Plan and with related development; and (d) (his acmendmetit promotes the goals pnd objectives of the Etiwanda Specific (an. (e) This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties and that a Negative Declaration be issued. 3. Based upon the substantial e-= idence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hp ?ring and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) The amendment does not conflict with the Circulation policies of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and (b) The amendment promotes the goals of the Circulation Element of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and (c) The amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. 4. This Cosnission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and recommends adoptionof a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this commission hereby resolves that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 22nd day of June, 1988, Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 88 -01. 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AM ADOPTED THIS 22W JAY OF JUNE, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM'ONGA BY: J Carry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST; IM IMd ouller, Deputy Secretary -3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. GENERAL PLAN AMDNEMENT.88 -JI ETIWANOA SPECIFIC PLAN June 22, 1980 Page 3 I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning QcwissioP of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adoptec: by the "tinning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Comrmission held on the 22nd day of June, 1988, by the follaWing vote -to -Wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS; NOES: COKUSSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 1 i I k N C m Ito .1 ROW CHERRY AVENUE PROPOSED FIG, - I I i l i TRE€,S £X, TACARRUDP CITY OF r P ITENIt Rai CUCA% A T(TLEC H ARYAVE EXHIBJT: i-A_ I IE -fl valuria cr kvf -mld-e far pillw Loop 84tweee 24th and 1 -15 PROPOSED FIG. 24TH. STREET . G PROPOSED FA.t of to NTH /Ift FIG. Sm35 ItITY OF MINI. _ E`ert RAI � t �� - Tom: o " l g- -4 � � Ie 1N E _.a ! AKK 111 /X TI16i/ANUA SPECIFIC 'FLAW 0 Equestrian Trails am= Bike 6erto (In Pavement) Bike Path (In Parkway) lCOMMUNITY �® � 1ro.Ae' ga � e e us°�eFsV' L� V PROPOSED NMTH CITY CF rE % I. A Rs. �8 -o t TM-Et o a-r a ry i RA j " t L s PLANNING DIVISION N a ry - E -- CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 22, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Associate - Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE 88-06 - CUCAMONGA ror s _ an or a 3 request ot subdivision e sion on 4.62 acres of land, in the Office District (Subarea 1) and Community Commercial District (Subarea 2) of the Foothill Specific Plan, located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and San Diego Avenue - APN: 207- 101 -43. RELATED FILE: PARCEL RAP 10238 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: I A. f,-,ion Requested. Approval of the Variance to reduce the lot wig th for arce s 2 and 3 and determination of the development district designation for Parcel 1. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning. North - -- vacant; ow es e— as District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre), Flood Control District South - Vacant, Cucamonga Creek Flood Channel; Community Commercial District (Subarej 2), Medium Residential District (8 -14 dwelling units per acre), Subarea 1 of Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan East - Vacant, Retail Building, Single Family Homes, Roller Rink; Coinimunity Commercial District, Subarea 2 of the Foothill boulevard Specific Plan West - Vacant, Office Building; Office District, Subarea 1 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan C. General Plan Designations- Project to --Of re s�rict, Subarea 1 and Community Commercial District, Subarea 2 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan North Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) South Community Commercial, Medium Density Residential (8 14 dwelling units per acre) 11L East Community Commercial West - Office ITEM K PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VARIANCE S8 -06 - CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DIST. June 22, 1988 Page 2 D. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant. It is traversed by e Cucamonga-Cr-e—eg7lood Channel. II. ANALYSIS: A. General- Cucamonga County Water District has requested for a t ree of subdivision (Parcel Map 10238) to legalize the parcels created by the construction of the Cucamonga Creek Flood Channel. The filing of the Parcel Flap necessitates this Variance request. The three parcels created are irregular in si-, and shape. B. Reduction of Lot Width for Parcels 2 and 3: The required, lot width for Parcels 2 and 3 is 200 feet. a proposed lot width for Parcel 2 ranges from the narrowest point of 20 feet to the widest point of 190 feet, while the lot width proposed for Parcel 3 ranges from the narrowest point of 30 feet to the widest point of 160 feet. In reviewing this Variance, staff finds that there are extraordinary circumstances that only apply to this s4te. The reason being that the site is traversed by a ,A ood control channel which created such irregular shapes and sizes of parcels. C. Parcel l Develo moment_ _District Issue: Parcel 1 is a remnant piece o an Teifi eveF__from construction of the ch; nel. Originally, Parcels 1, 2, and 3 weva all zoned as Control" Parcels 1, 2, and 3 were included in the study area for the Foothill Specific Plan. Exhibit "C" shows that Parcel 1 is not included in the graphic for Subarea 2 the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan boundary, The ultimate circulation plan for this section of tiie foothill Specific Plan indicated that San Diego Road will eventually be vacated while San Bernardino Road will be c1iosed as a cul -de -sac. Parcel 1 also is adjacent to existing single family hones which are currently designated for the Medium Density Residential District. The size of Parcel 1 being only a 1/2 acre, would accommodate a single family, home or could be combined with adjacent :easterly parcels for future redevelopment to Medium Density Residential. development. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission make a determination that Parc:.l 1 is within Subarea 2 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan with a land use designation of Medium Density Residential District. D. Environmental Assessment: Staff has completed Part 11 of the nv ronmen a ec - s:-'and determined that there will not be significant impacts as a result of this proposed Variance and the related Parcel Map. If the Planning Commission concurs with these findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. r 11 PLANNING COMMTSION STAFF REPORT VARIANCE 88 -06 - CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER GIST. June 22, 1988 Page 3 III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS. ,7 order for the Planning Commissio„ to approve Variance -06, facts to support the following findings must be made: 1. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specific regulations would result in practical &:,liculty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Foothill Boulevard SpWific Plan and the Development Code; and that without the Variance, the site could not be subdivided. 2. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or, conditions applicabl.a to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that does not apply generally to other properties in the same district; in that the site is traversed by Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Coannel which created and resulted in irregular sh-he and size of parcels. 3. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district; in that, without the Variance, the applicant could not subdivide the site. 4. That . granting of the Variance would not constitute a grant of special pklivitege inconsistent with the limizations on other properties classified in the same district; in that the site is traversed by the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel which resulted in the irregular shape and size of parcels. 5. That the granting of the Variance Y%01 not be detrimental to the public health, safety, welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the :•icinity, IV. CORPESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Laily Report newspaper as a public hearing, the property posted, and notices were sent to all property owners wi °ehin 300 feet of the project site. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VARIANCE 88 -06 - CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER GIST. June 22, 1988 Page 4 Y. RECOMAIENDAiION: Staff recorrn*ends'that the Planning Cortmission make the .e erm c,, ; on that Parcel I is within Subarea 2 of the Foothill Specific Plat and i's designated -.,as Medium Density Residential District, approve Variance 88 -06, and issue a Negative Declaration. Res, Ily su led, ad 8 r _ Ci 1 nner 'E BB;NF:te Attachments: Letter from Applicant Providing Justification for the Variance Request �p Exhibit "A„ - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Parcel Map Exhibit "C" - Foothill Specific Plan Subarea 2 Resolution of Approval ij p�rc•Prettdtni BEVERLY 1i. BRADEN 4 CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT LLOYyr. a.n.sn, ?d4AE w LLOYD W. MICHAEL 9641 SAN BERNARDINO RO • ^UCAti ONGA CALIF 917309636 •. PO COX G38 .. .714 967,_591 Dire to" CHARLES A. WEST GEORGE A. KUYKENDALL ROBERT NEUFELD,. Prasidani JEROME M. WILSON O May 23, 1988 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: Nancy Fong Re: Lot Size Variance for Tentative Parcel Map No. 10238 Dear Ms. Fong: The Cucamonga County Water District is requesting a variance to the lot size requirement contained within the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan for the parcels of land associated with tentative Parcel Map No, 10238. This parcel map application and variance request are being submitted to make legals three (3) lots that weri created by the construction of the Cucamonga Flood Channel and subsequent right - of -way acquisition. Although the three t33 lots are irregular in shape and size, all three (3) are buildable lots, The District currently has parcels 2 and 3 in escrow with different individuals. Parcel 2 can be built upon individually or can be combined with the Vtoperty to the east. Parcel 3 is currently intended to be combined with the property adjacent to the west and is currently being reviewed for suitability by a. developer. Parcel 1 can be built upon individually or can be combined with property to the northeast to create a better CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT a R,U, SOY. 638 •. CUCAMCIN_ A, CALIF. 91730.0630 r (7t4l 9Et7.259T.' City of Rancho Cucamonga May 23, 1988 Page ?, entrance scheme for the MF Zoned property, If you bave any questions regarding this request please do not hesitate to call. vouLs truly, CUCAMONGA .COUNTY WATER DISTRICT im Cline Engineering Departiu,:nt Supervisor JC:la r; U t rj Alr gUEBRAD,'E � 1 A :O RAZON fC 1 j a /02 I i i ?i�MLGCfC 57. 401 it r4P b8t I J AN 9ERIVARDI a Ra toy o0 � Alf 300 t�, ors !02 .1 W J r FOOTHILL BLVrj. ( -7 I ..� I {i t ! 2r! sca E ,t F PLINNING DIVISIQ K NOR TH TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP ICU. 10238 IN THE MY OF RANCHO CUCA..N tEC10.4 DIVISION OFA PORTION OFLOT 16, u4F or SU got VSION't�Oi CUCA40NOe FR VINEYARD TRACT AS PER FLAT RECORDED IN t00K 20, FACE {S Oi NnFS, RECORDS OF ^AN lERNAROIYO COUNTY. STATE OF CALIFORNIA. C C 0. {l CVV. ^ GT[R anA1Lr G`fr�.( IT{1 t{T if{ - tvt �Vt.rrotxat.dcn cc.n,r•c+ � � � j- �I w•[L•as as ascmun A.o[ro tcacco �` Wd's•O aLtaf.lat/. tir.c...aT K. axATto /FO•. Fatxo � �j [ ✓Fx 'i2��'. r iiF•� � µi • %iiinra ru {::u i �r:•rr arc[tLF� l -�i • r �' .l a o_, G nr.o•R {.ea euc{.o.aa at r_- t j � ' ctc• Iisl tl ums " //C -1 4 / / ". f0 C.". ta.1{� cnrY �V t[N _,11 u CC, t[RR: cu—. a.ounrT rC- C.— T r[ul -t GE.E••L TtL[i .e ce G / , / ►i of so aa4• aai CO E a f :m.c VACAYT YtltT •. o• iaS.,RA' 4�iK .tit ; iF([Ct E" T j'id tl�s • -1�' a -s ,.l rr /iqr� 'rrRia aFGNN< y�'� ��•LS/KNiut 7 e A -p q 3 1.9T ..,3�. 15 fX /STGNG � t COYYEgC //L ! _ o ,_ • 1 _ �\ E! /SIiXG r[r r.� .FOOT MI ttµ @OOt yJ0T n"in..awr N6N.p{r , CITY NIT M; r 66II �. ITE ANC CUCAMONGA TITLE; _....P3 -PLANNING DIVISION 1\ n RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 88-06 TO REQUEST THE REDUCTION OF AT THE WIDTH OF OF PARCEL LOCATED CORNER OF SAND DIEGO AVENUE 8 AND FOOTHILL 80ULEVARD IN THE OFFICE AND GOAUMUNITY COMtMERCIAL DISTRICTS OF HE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD 'SPECIFIC PLAN - APN° 207- 101 -43 A. Recitals. (i) Cucamonga County Water District has filed an application for the issuance of the Variance No, 88 -06 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resoluticn, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application ". iii? On the 22nd of June, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed iublic hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, detewnined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancha Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the .Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence resented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on ui,ne 22, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and San Diego Avenue with a, street frontage of 07P. feet and variable lot depth and is presently improved with the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel; and (b) The Property to the north of the subject site is vacant, the property to the south of that site is vacant, the properties to the east are developed with retail buildings and a roller rink, and the property to the west is vacant. (c) The site is traversed b%- the Cucamonga County Flood Control Channel which created and resul*erA fe,'parcel`i e, irregular shapa and.' size. I s, PLANNING:COMMISSI014 RESOLUTION NO. VARIANCE 8E -06 - CUCAMONGA COUNTY NAtR DIST, June 22, 1988 Page 2 . Based uporr the substantial evidence pr�ented to this Commission during Zhaabove- refereciced vub►ic nearing anii upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph, 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: !al That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation w -uld result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Develooment Code. ! ?l that there arc exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or~ conditions applicable to .the property involved or to; the intended use of the Property that do not .apply generally, to other propertie-;in the same dfstrict.. (c) That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. (d) That the granting of the Variance will not { constitute a grant of special Privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other Properties classified in the same district. tel That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public Health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity~ 4, Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph z, 2 and '3 above, th;',; Commission hereby approves the application. � . The DePUty Secretary to this. Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 1988. PLANNINfi COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANC'AT CUCAMONGA BY. �Y e � airman ATTEST ra a er, epu y ecre ary K-11 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. VARIANCE 88 -05 - CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DIST. June 22, 1988 Page 3 I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planting Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduc¢d, passed, and adopted by "the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of June, 1988, by the fallowing vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMIS."'ONE.RS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: �I �/ i CITY OF A offf ST FF REP DP'TE. 3une ?Z, 1988 s of the planni!19 C"an'ss"on TO, Chairman and Member City Engineer FROM, will"M j. Silvas DePuty gineer 3r., A$soriate Civil En Stofa, LVE pARCEL 1A1AP Cucaminto F- 3oe , es; �0--�- BY: SMEtit AA13 TE%TAT1 r acr on the v1s on -tong located ot#401 AL ASSES Mul �'105 �O'Liqnat T SUB3ECT: ERVIR Control des 0 Avenue (APtA ount ater n t e 00,dh-ll Boulevard and San Dieg parce s , of Fort 1 VKT� northwest corne VA SS-06) ?-,7_101-43) (Ref- SITE DES—SR-121110"' -Tentative �arcal 14ap as of the proposed Action Pe ue ted: Approval A. s wn on it "B" I - 0.45 Acre Parcel 2. 6 Acres parcel 2 - ? B. tParcel Size, I Parcel,l� 0, Icres flood Control y.i stimkniaw C. Land use- SurrO ndi 9. �:V��eek -�hannel North _ Cucamona Cr South - Vacant East General Commercial West officelprofessional It code Dwo-�� p16, and DeVILA�;.�— E. Surround,n General tjorth Flood control South Commerci al Commercial East - office/ProfessiOnal West IT . .......................... PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PM 10238 - Cucamonga County Water District June 22, 1988 Page 2 F. Site Characteristics: Thi►•site is currently vacant and slopes from nor to sou a approximately 4 %. II. ANALYSIS: The purpose of this Parcel Map is to create three (3) separate ego parcels for the portions of a single parcel which were physically separated and became remnants by the construction of the Cucamonga Creek Channel, In addition, the applicant is proposing to vaG;ate San Diego Avenue and provide a north- south private access easement kL<Ftween Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino'Poad as recommended its Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. There are no plans for any development at this time. III.. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The applicant completed Fart I of the Initial Study. ' a con ucted a field investigation and completed Part II of the Initial Study. No adverse impacts upon the environment are anticipated as a result of this project. Therefore, issuance of Negative Declaration is appropriate. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Nearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Daily I'[eport Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been completed. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input--RU elements of the Tentative Parcel Map. If after such consideration, the Commission can recommend approval, then the adopti/in of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration w�;�ld be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, War l i am J. Silva, P.E. DEputy City Engineer WJS:JS :sd Attachments: Vicinity Map (Exhibit "A ") Tentative Map (Exhibit 11811) Resolution and Recommended Conditions of Approval rUU- H d LL aL\! a L- 3 AV E. CITY OF I 'IANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGMEEMG DrVISION I I't nnZ --TENTATIVE MAP Lxmrr.. 'I (a it 11 ,r RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 10238 WHEREAS, Tentative ''Parcel Map Number 10238, submitted by Cucamonga County Water District, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 3 parcels, the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, identified as APN(s) 207 - 101 -43, located on the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and San Diego Avenue; and WHEREAS, on June 22, 1988, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above - described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONC•.A PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS SECTION 1.: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse effects on abutting property. SECTION 2: This Comnig -tion finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and onsidered in �,.ampliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Mao No. 10238 is hereby approved subject to -e a tacked Standard Conditions and the following Special Conditions: 1. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Foothill! Boulevard shall be undergrounded from the first pole on the east sides of San Diego Avenue (to be vacated) to the first pole offsite west of the project boundary, including across the Cucamonga Creek Channel, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy of Parcels 2 or 3, whichever occurs first. The Developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one -half the RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 2 D City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. 2. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the east side of San Diego Avenue (to be vacated) shall be undergrounded from Foothill Boulevard to San Bernardino Road upon development of Parcel 2. 3. San Diego Avenue shall be vacated from Foothill Boulevard to the Southern Pacific Railroad Right -of -Way concurrently with the Final Map. 4. A Public Utility Easement for the existing utilities shall be provided on the Final Map to the satisfaction of the utility companies. 5. A joint -use access easement alone Foothill Boulevard shall be required for Parcel a or the benefit of the adjacent property to toe west. 6. The cul -de -sac on San Bernardino Road shall be constructed upon development of rarcei I or 2. APPROVED AND .iDOPTED THIS 2Z'10 DAY OF 3U9E, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. MctaielP C airman ATTEST: Brad Fuller, epu:'u ecretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Com 'fssiolr of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of ,tune, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit; 4 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: �. NOES: COMMISSI04ERS: ABSENT COMMISSIONERS: a' Q 9 C a s p +C K, original poor oumaty F� 'x\.44 LM .} •l 4tVS .y` ZZ y= -a ZZ P $ �j �yy • ° Zu � ��.� • tV r ■ NYN L +� YM� 4N CC 6y� 7y �� ` p K�� NM �•4i �� n 2 Y`�` VyT 6Y L14%� K y. a�_i ` eY •� y7M K� a+ & IZ r r� � cag�i � gg �•.> 0 �, w .. a w,� y•µl ii .8;! qr p.��ppu ID�g ■a. �' „Y= Gl� Mp .C.0 `r TN ate+. {yQ+ '�� O1V •3G' ypa� q�9 V7 SFq M N M• p @ C U Z:3Z a� 4y�+ __Y L Vi`� `Z•"0 Nlt� OLD C.tl`IY OCJ� Y r Yi E:d y V/isi ; `4 N �i t .} i'.. P $ sw Zu wtA F •iccC' VyT 6Y 4r K y. a�_i ` eY •� y7M K� a+ & IZ � '€.+�� .Y a 3YY4My Tny a�� ,V ay ID�g ■a. a -34i Xq `r TN �Y O C U IA M N M• p @ C U Z:3Z a� 4y�+ __Y L u w w av tgw .cam r Yi E:d ; N a µ N :i: --7 �i _ g ou ._► r4�. an �� a E � � �• �; s o _�. yy oY « Y c�S pp�N o u C i. WL1L �G�a 0.Y SQ L. iY�. KI I r e, C Y 1 g e V yL O1y •t� � �W �y �Yy V�D � NIY. ��. st r a WyY ��1 rtrt S Qn' a e Y N 01 M C N Yi & g « 1k+ i Z� Y � 5 1j b a~ r_v tiJ YY oil DATE TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT r; June 22, 1988 Chairman and M'er,)ers of the Planning Commission William J. Silva, Deputy City Engineer Joe Stofa, Jr., Associate Civil Eu)ineer .,n�as�. rnnt�c4 cYtr "Jua - 13drLon A s2 ivisicI of 9. 04 acres of land into feral Industrial District iSubarea 81 located west of Rea Oak Street, approximately 510 feet north of Jersey Boulevard (APN 209 - 142 -34) I.• PROJECT AND SITE DE, RIPTION: A. Action Requested, Approval of the proposed Tenttitive Parcel Map as showr. on EiF it GB" B. Parcel Size - Parcel 1•- 0.50 Acres Parcel 7 - 0.46 Acres Parcel 2 - 0.32 Acres Parcel 8 - 0.41 Acres .Parcel 3 - 0.41 Acres Parcel 9 - 0.33 Acres Parcel 4 - 0.45 Acres Parcel 10 2.51 Acres Parcel 5 - 0.47 Acres Parcel 11 - 0.93 Acres Parcel 6 - 0.61 Acres C. Existing_ Zoning: General Industrial District (Subarea 8) D. Surrounding land Use: North - Vacant South - Industrial Buildings East - Industrial Buildings West - Vacant N•_ E. Surrounding General Plan and Development Code Designations: " North - General Industrial, Subarea 8 South - Genera'.' Industrial, Subarea 8 € East - General In,lustrial, ;subarea 8 West - General Industrial, Subarea 8 _ ITEM. M PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PM 1I563 - aartun Development Company June 22, 1.. ".88 Page 2 F. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant with the land sloping approxima e y o` the south. II. ANALYSIS: The purpose of this Parcel Map is to create n separate par'ce s for the Industrial buildings which were approved as Development Review 87 -6O by the Planning Commission on February 24, 1988. The parcel . dines in relationship to the approved project site plan are shown on Exhibit "C ". This site is referred to as Phase III of the pre, '.ously approved Master Phan as shown in Exhibit "D". Red Oak StrEat between Arrow Route and Jersey' DouleVard was completed with Pnase II of the Master Plan. III. tnti VIRO „ME NTAL REVIEW: The applicant completed Part I of the Initial yto con Octed a field investigation and completed Part II of e Initial StudyNo adverse impacts upon the environment are cipated as a result of this project. Therefore, issuance of Negative Declaration is appropriate. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Vaily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been completed. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission considt aTT input and elements of the Tentative Parcel M . If after _ch coi.'ideration, the Commission can recommend approval, _ then the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Resp ct��y submitted, ��i11iam /J. Silva, P.E. Deputy City Engineer WJS :JS:sd Attachmants: Vicinity Map (Exhibit "All) Tentative Map (Exhibit "B” LLM Approved DR 87 -60 (Exhibit "C ") Approved Master Plan (Exhibit I'D ") AW Resolution and Recommended Conditions of Approval 6L s» .w: e:a � me BASELINE FOOTHILL eLvo. i ARROW ROUTE JERS Lim SAN 9ERIARC110 FVY. a �.a o� CrrY OF M& PPkEL MAD NCHO CUCAMONGA TI'l&- _VICIM17V MAD ENGDMMING DrMION EXMI .'. of A H_. 4- FTENTAIT1VE PARCEL AMAP d4NO, 11563 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNT,,, OF SAN 89R JARDINO, STATE OF CAVFORNIA. �' • �� 1'O11T'u11Of \K !41lP/I 1/? OF SfC.^ION 1=, R71i t0Y w0 MSO6y 2 Ov 1i11Of� nn:. 1111 f1620 W iUON 74 MKS 41 AND 42 or 11ce-a"". . K M.al: S' SiN 641Mi,Upt,1p COUNTY. CA 1,011mm Gtif✓D �iA1Q fl�I /MM1 � -.:�• d RAt Mw azs ' aL crff C P Imo: RML NAP I[S4L RANCHO CUCAMONGA 7ENTAiIVE E°"iA I ENGDTEEaWG D$V% ION I H" r �� Q� � �i� i .�� .� ■� a A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL mAP NUMBER 11563 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 11563, submitted by Barton Development Company, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 11 . parcels, the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, identified as APN(s) 204 - 142 -34, located west of Red Oak Street, approximately 510 feet north of Jersey 'Boulevard; and WHEREAS, on dune 22, 1988, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hear n-g for t.Fse-Above- described trap; FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS SECTION 1: That the following findings have .,een made: i. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. i 4. That the proposed subdivision and improyements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health protlems or Uve adverse effects on abutting property, I SECTION 2: This Commission finds and certifies that the project has been review— considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 11563 is hereby approved subject to e a tacked Standard Conditions and the following Special Conditions: 1. Offsite sidewalk and parkway landscaping on the interior public streets may be deferred until development of the adjacent property, 1 l U APPROVED AND ADAPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 1983. PLANNING COMMISSION: OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McN e , awn { ATTEST Brad u ler, Depu y Secretary {' I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning of .he City of Rancho Cuce;w0ja, do hereby certify that the foregoiriy �esolutio"as duly and regularly introduced, pasted, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of June, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES:. COMMISSIONERS; (( NOES: COrIMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: tj 'i r f� 1 t E Y a N b 01 6 Q ^yy b W v �e ale •' Y s a° Vr ■. jyY N �O C 9.06 � a Y Y 66 'n >•e � �. Y,r'Ft �jyy L�� iu W�Q �. �C •� L ¢5.� C4f it�M Y�� •�6 6 aa�� y�iIpN p0a rRR� V+ M•^ �' yW j� aOCT.Y yC 6OY' eC v 6Y� V C IlLpppryyy !l ■ y ao.dYiy b V` ^- N C ��•HYy 0 ± q 0 ' 0 E ^ yvMd�•s^^io CdC W.. +�IIyGY� r�O1` p.pa y� y� u1C ►�0"�p.. `�iV �i Vn�Y ?Ora anv HS! • W N w ® 01 .qi as y a c6 F3 b � YL f•D C�3 v8 ya •� ss i Y Y ^v a ^ 9 • � i. bC go j ° 21 I bF Zak • $ � Y � MM M � S 0 !111 .Y g . • 1 � Y _q Eli � g uN tv lii�$ asib 1:ru vrT. <b K. •wv u ^ N e IN V! A N XI G6•• tN to n4 Yl N_iC 6.0m ri �aY p O q N r g TFq r°..IL 4b L9� CN °pq�{y��• w�` quA � °V� 9 • �8 LcN —gbib 0. $o f N ~ I it Y • � • pj4 ` Ay YYi Nfl �l L� MO •� . � buy Fw Y 88 37 4F � - .2$ 11 rl a`.Y. r Yy� Y G44nt Sd ' :k It a: � ��" P�o �JIo� �Qp - � 3Y SCR tz, .�� <i pp r Bp ~ N N (y 4 I 14 y y � ^ � ' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT I� DATE: June 22" 1988 -~~� ?0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Comm1muYnn FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Debra Wier, Psoociate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13873. - VIRLIAM LYON COMPANY - A "one lof sjbdivision Sr- condominium urposes I design review for 124 units.',on 7.78 acres of land irl1he,',Medium-J4fgh Residential District (14-24 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Planned Community located on the nomhwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Atwood Street - APN: �27-11242. 13, 28, 34, and 35. Associated with this project is a Tree Removal I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: AL ActionRequested: Approval of Subdivision Map. Conceptu�.-_i 'Mot Tq—an Conceptual Grading Plan_, Conceptual Landscape Plan, and buil�ing elevations for tile daveiopment of 124 apartment units, and issuance ofa Negative Darlaration. B. 15.9 dwelling' units per acre, C. Surroundina Land Use and Zonin norm Si (4- 8 dwelling units par acre) South - � East - ' bow Residential (24 dwelling units per acre) wmmt ~ Vacant; Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) D. General Plan Designations: ��ect Site medidwelling per acre) Norm ~ dwelling units per acre) South ~ Medium—High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per East - Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) Nmmt - Medium Residential (8_14 dwelling units, per acre) ITEM PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 13873 - wILLIP:1 LYON CO. June 22, 1985 Page 2 E. Site Characteristics: The site is bordered to the north by the Southern Pacific Raflroa d•right -of -way, to the east by Victoria Park Lane, to the south by vacant land intended to he used for a future Village Commercial- site, and to the west by an abandoned raflroad track and vacant land within the Medium -Nigh Residential DistriCt.L The site slopes generally north to south at approximately 2.5 percent. A Tree Removal Permit accompanies the project for the removal of a partial Eucalyptus windrow along the north prnperty boundary. They will be replaced with a continuous row of Sugar Gums (fucalyptus cladocalyx) along the north and west property boundary. No other significant plants or structures exist on the site. F. Farting Calculations: Total Units: 124 Unit Mix - 1 bedroom 44 2 bedroom 80 - " Parking -2equired: 44 x 1.5 = 68 80 X 1.5 = 144 124 x 0.25 v 31 Tdtal parking spaces required - 741 Parking Provided: EnclosedJCoveaed - 124 Open - 124 Total parking spaces provided 248 II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The project contains six different unit types ranging In from a 57S square foot one bedroom unit to a 1,100 square foot two bedroom townhouse style unit. The units are arranged in six different building types. Parking has been provided in tuck -under garages,` satellite carports, and open parking. Cach unit is assigned one covered or enclosed and_ recreation building. er Include tan tennis ed totolot with active play equipment is required. v v I PLANNING colvissION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 13873 - WILLIAM LYON CO. June 22, 1988 Page 3 B. Access: The project is designed as a gated comri,anity and takes only public access from Atwood Street. A secondary emergency access is proposed to be graded to Base Line Road until the parcel to the south is developed. Staff recommends that a sidewalk connection be provided along the east side of this secondary access to the clutherly property line. When the Village Commercial site develops, a cut -de -sac street mast be incorporated into that site design. The primary entrance from Atwood Street connects to a loop drive through the site. C. Master Plan: A Conceptual Master Plan for the shopping center lro a sou`eh is indicated on the plans. Although it is not being reviewed as part of this project, staff does have a number of concerns with the Site Plan. These include, but are not limited to, public street dedication along the westerly boundary, paseo trail connections, and pedescrian orientation. D. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Chitiea, Fmerick, Kroutill reviewed the project on May 5, 1988. At that time, the Committee approved the site planniq and landscape aspects of the project, however, the Committez\ expressed the following concerns with respect to the architecture: 1. Add key features that would give the project an element of "excitement ". 2. Break away from the complete symmetry of all the buildings. The addition of asymmetrical elements could add variety to "e overall building form. 3. The carports should receive architectural attention to be integrated into the project design. Such elements as stucco posts, varied roof design, and stucco detail patterns would enhance the carport design. 4. The applicant should provide details of cornice and balcony /railing elements indicating weight/ materials of such features. S. Careful attention sho -Ad be paid to elevations which feature carriage units over garages. At a follow -up meeting on June 2, 1988, t;e Comittee reviewed re,rised architecture. The Committee found the revisions to be acceptablF, and reflective of previous comments. The item that the Committee did continue to express concern about was the landscape treatment on the front elevation of the carriage type elik units under the second story balconies. A condition of approval has been included on the attached Resolution that ,I ghlights the need for careful plait selection and accent plant materials for these areas. N-- PLANNING COPiMISSION STAFF R €90RT TENTATIVE TRACT 13873 � WILLIAM LYON CO. June 22, 1988 Page 4 E. Technical Review Committee: The Committee has reviewed the project an eterm ne at with the recommended special � condition and attached standard. conditions of approval the project is Consistent with all applicable standards - and Ordinances. F. Environmental Assessment :" Part I of the Initial Study has been comp re e y ne app rant. Staff Kis completed Part II of fi+ie Environmental Checklist and found no significant ir--'Cts on the environment as a result of; is project. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the Victoria 7 anne ornmun f and the General Plan, and will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause sign-' fi cant" adverse impacts. The proposed use, building design, and _ ladivis on, toge*"4r with all �1 recommended condition of appror{ ,A1.,, are in compliance with applicable regulations of the D+avvibpmnt Code and the Victoria Community Plana IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in iA a� Ty—Report newspaper, 'he property posted, and notices were sent to- a1T- property owners i6ihin 300 feet of the project site, V. RECOmMENDATiON: Staff recommends that the Manning Commission approve Tentative Tract 13873, subject to the conditions of approval, through adoption of the attached Resolution and issuaree of a Negative Declaration, Res .: ,y s itted', Br B Ciicy Anne BB:DM :te i Attachments: Exhibit "A -11" - location Map i Fxhibit "A -2" - Sit Plan Exhibit - Tentative Subdivision Map ��B�� Exhibit C - 'Conceptual Grading Exhibit "Du - Conceptual Landscaping Exhibit E - Buildings Elevations Resolution of Approval with Conditions i vis" -. s:�vni I I , . 4 I 3M3tlflyl 866 m7tlW7 M �JVTUl1 i ?i6 I I ti CITY ITEM: raCi 1 RANCHO, PLANNING DIVISION IV CUCA ON TITLE: Vii" Ian 4 a D i lauraft 'MugAwz Raym 'call ori>ora3 23 tt i 41CTIOM p -p.. 't 8dSCjf, wn MRATE DRIVE "W000 2"E" MIV.1TE DRIVE udseM to+aCMa 11NIq EF4'i7o11 o-C. PRIVATE com 6lTgN A -A l i to lauraft 'MugAwz Raym b� XORTH F Ty OF ITEM: PLANNING, ;IVISION `E. A ,� �l.K3Y 23 tt i 41CTIOM p -p.. wn MRATE DRIVE "W000 2"E" MIV.1TE DRIVE udseM to+aCMa 11NIq EF4'i7o11 o-C. PRIVATE com 6lTgN A -A b� XORTH F Ty OF ITEM: PLANNING, ;IVISION `E. A ,� 'Cal, OY 17W3 m �� 1xptl3Clt11)� 3�Y77�A r�t sunvw a� 1 I ! ! m 1 1 r �\ %\ n �d Elm !tgr n_s 39 ON w secsmr C-c aeery C-C NORTH CITY OF ITEM, 0 RA7,iCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE- LANNING DIVISTQI�T �/';-7 r N g EXHIBIT:. SCALE: E �CSU OR 17Yp1 S RUd4 lr2maNIR17 3OYTllA LEGEND J NOATNWEST PntmrER .,,CALYPTUS CLAOOCALYX - SUGAR UOII aOUtR AND EAfT KMAETEA A/wtooP.roao EUCALYPTUS CLAOOCALYR - SUGAR GLM tuRP PTAl3 ELOAIECA - tICN ZO.ECT ETRRIT A:..DR OtOLSIOCO YEkYSNRLS1411EA OiZ1A AlL6RgaPj -SA.K TREE WAOUOX7ENNI :PAIGE Emom ENTRY ACCENT LAGERSTPOEMIA POCA- CRAPE MYRTLE (STANDARD) �. CORCRETE BLOCK Yt ETOCCO room WALL SCEE wo ►IANTKt} 9ETWEEN UNTa A POMAUS NORA ITALICA - LOMBARDY POPLAR �'�ED PAYEq OPEM pAC[ PLAtiTM6 pE4LOWPlEpipE- GLFNMCROLS J L I S 4 NORTH N CH ' PLANNING `�IG DiV$SI� '� r� EXl;SIBITs ---AC7 '7CALE: I p w - -- _ La" 81M 6lRT4TiOM PROM BL&WATWN �i �lxe L411- sale oawat r-- .--- -•. - - -- Ilss N aeM w�sYafi� —� CITY OF RANCHO .: .,,,PLANNING DIVISION TITLE: EXHIBIT: SCALE: if IIMIINRIIUI Nit iILfINVIIIIMt 111UtI�IiNtiUll N'flIINiN_ IN�iIfIIU I111UUill xY +� { 1 �� i �•... 111• t ! REAR 1-7y AW sly.... OF ie � N H CLTC ONGA TI TITLE: �� ---� -- NIYG DIVISION %�s' N ,s— EXHIBIT: SCALE: c +�� f i� r _ �.� r�.li l�� IC�IrI � °�� . �. S.N '�� i I.�i l Flo r i l l- I �.L I °� RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY G-7 RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPRCY!,'M VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP ISO. 13873 FOR A ONE LOT. SUBDIVISION FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES AND DESIGN REVIEW OF 124 UNITS ON 7.78 ACRES OF LAND IN TH «' MEDIUM -HIGH R €SIDENTIAL DISTRICT (14 -24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACES) OF THE VICTORIA PLANNED C'JMMUNTTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF VICTORIA PARR LANE AND ATWOOD STREET - ,LPN: 227- 111 -12, 13, 28, 34, AND 35. ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT IS A TREE REMOVAL PERMIT, A. Recitals. {i ) ..i Company has filed an app'1(cation for the approval of Vesti,,,� r,ct Map No. 13.373is described in the t'tle of this Resolution. Pz naate th's Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referi_d tows 'ache application ". (i:) On the 22nd of June, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the appliration and concluded said tiearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of th' ',solution . have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Carols *ion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: I. This CMission hVeby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantr.: Eiidenci, presented to this Commission during the above - referenced puolic hearing J. -fie 22, 1988, inceuding written and oral staff reports, together with publi,. cstimony, 'this Commission hereby -cify,,ally finds as follows. ) northwest tornerof Vi toriapPark Lane andpg&oodtStrpeet Brand located at the (b) The property to the north of the subj_Nt site is `'fisting single fawily resider, s, the Drotiev'ty to the south of treat situ is vacant laird, the property , the east: is exjstiny tinGle family residames, and the property to the west is. " -mot. 1_n� ;rnd (c) F1ft'erti 'des presently exist on the site, due tr, 'ng constiaints, th"-- be removed. The trees will be eplarr_,1 with a continuous biqu? and west property boundaries. iyptus cladocalyx along the nortkr PLANNING: COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 13873 - WIL:JAM (YON CV. Jugs 22, 1988 Page 2 �i 3., Based upon the subst4ntial evidence presentedLto this Commissions ,,ring the above- referenced public hearing and upon the Specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Cow.is, ion hereby finds and cancludes as follows: (a) T:,.,Zt tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific,,' plans; and (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is 'con0 stint witrt, the General Plan,; Development Cole, and specific plans; and (c` The site is •physically suita:tle for t_ typo of development p- oposed, and (d) The design .af the subdivis *1;5n is not likely to.. :dose substantial envIrtnmental dauge and l avoidable isrjury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause Aft serious public health problems; and (f: As design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the publ.c at large, now of rkvorw :fir access through or use of the property within the proposed sub4ivision. 4. This uommission hereby finds and carti"`les that the proiect has been revipweA and considered in compliance with the Califtirnia Environmental - Quality Act of 1970 and fur , Oeclaration. ther, this Commission 9 h`rebv issues a Negative ' S. Based upon the findings a,A conclusions set forth in paragraph. 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application Subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attacked Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Design Review (1) The area below the second Floor balconies of 8014ings I and 3 shall be ccrefuily considered w,th I regard to plant selection. P,,2 landscape materials selected for these areas 5h3Pi be tolerant of shale and p; -avide 1n azcent backdrop to this arer.. „ A PLANNINu C(AMISSION RESULUTION NO: TENTATiJE MALT 13873 - VILLIAN LYON Co. June '2, 1988 Page 3 (2) The remova' of the 15 existing Eucalyptus trees is approved subject to replace -rnent with a continuous windrow of Eucalyptus iadocalyx yr Eucalyptus maculata along the narth and west property boundaries. (3) A sidewalk connection to the south property line hail be provided along the east side of the secondary access drive and m�v be secured with a lockable wrought iron gate. Tentative Tract (I) A device (low block wall, curb, etc.) along,ll':toria Park Lane is required at the landscape easement line to define the limits of public versus private- parkway maintenance areas to the satisfaction of both the City Engineer ano City Planner. (2) Atwood Street shall be constructed full width except that off -site sidewalk and parkway landscaping may be deferred until development of the adjacent property. (3' A permit from the Southern Pacific Railroad is *quirpd for any work within its right -of -way. (4) Flood pretection shall be provided with the foliowing requirements: (a) Construct a f',o, ;barrier wall along the north and west property No,indaries, ani {b) Raise the pbd elevations above the Q1OO orate ~, level per FEMA, requirements to the sa.isfaction of the City EngF:eer. 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Co .Ii'ssion shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution; APPROVED AND n orTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 1988. PLANNING COWMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, a rman r AftL ATTEST: ra u er,Yeputy�5eerexa y�" _ i e; PLANNING COMMIS'14N RESOLUTION NO. TENT ATIYE TRACT 1873 - WILLIAM LYON CO. y Juste 22, 1988 Page 4 f I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretiiy •of the Planning Commissi of the City of Ranch,r Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing itesol�tion was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by t`J Planning /Commission of the City of Rancho:Cucamonga, at regular meeting of the Planning Comission held t on the 22nd day cf June, 198%'-,by-the following vote- to -wit�i AYES: COMM$SSIONERS: 1!� - �' NOES: COMh1ISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: i r -. <, ti 9S S 91nal Pooroualftv ilu -"B v. v;j ng - -,j-- J. i- . V" I az j Zp I q If: Ah 111-4 an , - &Z V; JA q -1 a Q 4R U82-A E-A A j lgfmsv.'� -1- a i12 Tr ;Vhl Si. TL r ff . �Mff Ries- Ilia pr ;jjjTL 1PUZ a fl i na j a! Kit finim? 9� 7 r -7i. ifinvi JS IRI JI e 2 34 21 a tl g Oi i NN 8 p Q �Nj •{$�pb� @ r yl'1� $p$4 •a b 9 M C� �4 ax �» 4�aW Oa��o �•4y [j��Y �q ►G ^q qyVy YYO�o we 4�^ 4 �F i.O �! ��a�t y�.�� •i R'�''E� � 1�qi. i'�- S ;, K*pr� �r oy'cd �� ►L°•�°°L..S"Y��u mC �w i$ �,y�y i3j. E0'I[_yqyq�¢yt �!S ^ „bv wh1`•� (cy�� •it I �T••.0 F6 AN SC !6�• wNYO am- J r! $N »g•• H —M ' C oil ! _■ ! r ttp{�• a^ i ta 11,,.0 � � ».}�v w�.L�°b �. ; �4. N7�11•N� �.. $. r •• ��i ZZ io Shan Ira �o�>Y As Jb?L Y�» l g3 r _Y~ • w "N4 �1i Nly I � I IN 11c.r 0 $s� L$ w � n � �. r y - E I A 14, a� $ d p 4^ - 1 �KyBD-^gN �y 6 t�¢.oQ yGy .^r I I C JAW tl H Iq y sY3 a� 9 «°� !p V g7�f jai +. , A Act.. a� l Y1Y' b°j:_� yelY ¢gSS¢�� Sams Aji 'p ! aya N .{ 2-W a_ WWW •a.(• A �i 41 i(0 ya � « ^ V b 4 '1G.� M 4 y vl f 6i I � I IN 11c.r 0 $s� L$ w � n � �. r y - E I A 14, a� $ d p 4^ - 1 �KyBD-^gN �y 6 t�¢.oQ yGy .^r I I C u Original po ®r Quality cam1; � ! if ff s.o -� Co =y° CgYS O ♦ o.. 4H. v v 3�� .�°.w � ��. H � ept1 {y oyat{,o�� OYN.�Ne� Uwe xyM !+ 3a R Yr Ii�00 Q0Y. 11u� AigON �,V r�.V� GA w O v O y ,,, �~ L•�. ��..iqq, wKp. Yr AS ~o ®�i� +C �p O•. ae is ib �:rR��. aLOA iE �$' nA' .�^ Lv •�pT "a�$..$N.r� s UNIX ,Q E ENV •a; w g �� YELL a4ayO $N �� ,p,. ^� °i i+ lli$i W u • \iF '.1 Yv 0.N N IBC 'L Y i CU• M ^A NOLL Y L•Mi �aip �Lk. pPi. 3 3i qq$$�, Yl rrN a tM^ i:° aMw �'♦aJi 4i .n••°• AR S P r�Yw ssP is s W L C a N� "YS 0 ti jL 43 o� 3�i N Vw sa o N� L Y w ^ o CC <♦S.r �a O a °Q w s �• ♦ A O y tl �• ps ffi " r d�f if LO_ a R yL fL1�6p. 7 » A g i♦ilgC i ^ u G �s I `Y :x O ffi �N r gCO3 i •Y' C L� a'. II N s t.. Y V Nw xg. � M 6 � ee 4 V� C; Y ; DDS O q LA; a L, C r � O � w u ^L+Ow r N�• L �S e� .a .x i yj O 11 Ps ♦• A N 3a �P a b w � N p e A �V <d r wMY „_ 1j - q • M Y N Y a�H� a ~ O V �r. L u aVy Y Y T V1 �a is 9 w � Y gib Y1 L CO p ' �p s v 8 'La. y jr,x fail � o ^�kiM qw s i� W OP C 'S w v c W >pd$ z jv�a y `•AV N �JI '`e'}flf"u�j N��DP,ryw M K M Y .yVV._w0.0.YL NI ih HZE 3 nttz -11.'r u Yy C6 aQYN Ve+6° L�y► yS `g ■MS GYF y�Y \��tl a�fm�� r CY D•.C� lTe. � SOS X09 " � L�I'i1ti ■6YOX t7 8 ` fY3^ p L4 "iYI y G •••• X4411 §�•! mill as q FN.,�. T�� K 11 $._ =C Zia Oil! Wmi Jug yy,r C y ^ _ _ 4e� - Nis. p .. u � 4 �8y N ` N p� s ¢ sill Stw IL P��a� = � ��{I= �(� \. \\ Grp _� •at x �� Y �pi �y.� • YN. ��'• 6q� V lei I !. yam" lI®IC\ eCq D \`' \' � V }��' �MY��tc1� �iaK.� �t�� f. Y1..N �r.4►.YT ljg = � ya r Ir Wad S � +qi�1� s V 1 o t. Y �w � ` y e••'0. -lilt i.. xw�'rVy C MY ••e ^N �Oq�Vyq� 'D RY��' ��K~ �. Tj� (O• V�t�c �Y� '.Y �C •'a Y shy -v�4 R� ,�.� ^•! ai V� : "i�. V �t 9 � - •'Na v., _ � i7� r9 •' c�o.� al t.s i�� i' �Ti •. L� V....c. s'�:o_ f i Y f /.. Vi e ri 491m; Poor Quality r4 pi8 Cd 4"t, i 44 +� Vj�v�0 NM9 O p�� N aL'i. N •fO G �g L S "OM LY�.G. O. 0. ° \j(1L�• L uY lK «p. �� O . as ss is s $R 2 SA HE �:.33u s`o uE �`o �� u'1�'ss. asi� ],• � y�� L�.. �'S'. �.��u Y" A3,11 V E �S Ni�g y w�• _y L N= ;i E34 �^ N Vb N OI WO• _N w V Y Y� YYL gg WN N Aj V I m �FR ��77iiS2 � wL � �y � � � ,`► sm3�� Y ys Y yrYy« a UZI a sp w OV 2- b U,y ��. os Ga sa 41"a K1i. C v F- .'�. A s uY e 1p �.aTTL r 3 s ®« T,.X g Ali S; p g !gal 9 Rk N Y Y uM1 i Y �e O i� iJt- yyy��yW Y N t an�, ssW V Y M -C Y w S a Gov a�+'s�3 8 wHPa .. iL' 4 figl w Eli 3L Q... 8S:q of gas i 6w. V.�a YYY V' {N, f rr p L. i S�eyv�O � Y�. � M zt ri i13 ``� N yi s. 'Yr N 3 �uM� ej f. �. qj bOL� NNO ate. Y'� �Il tbwy� yR i i 6 N�y^. yrs `b� ®� ��•`Y «� u Y e � r s+ �y v � p _Y dZ �' `j �3 3 _e$ g v � C rL wN NO L'ej i N'O �y S O' F x Y • Y L SS t! w�wPr S gYYN� � a >® p �SIT m my v ` wa� .u. h V4,M a Elf s a zoL s Q � �y ■ Ap W ti W 1; 1 iy 0 `a L r SS t! w�wPr W a >® p �SIT m my v ` e .u. V4,M a a .i Ell ti W 1; 1 SS t! w�wPr W a >® p e .u. zoL > 44— Vb..u. yrye p•R Y O i� Iw L d O win Dy 1. gg6d V Y° V� Ly1� e buy. gt/6. yy ti W 1; 1 t I� Iv a 11 V L� O C M 6 L Ol Q N � A3 Y� 9 _ss T aL' 4 V'L Y Y P L, r I Co O sCC V q V e�W r \s a St ♦[[11 3 i `w M g�JkL 1 a� o o =e 9QQ,�p O � sg; I s. 0 a dot/ t! L L 4a =bp`w 3 _ace s�;r Jb � Y Mi. 1 � O j } Z.ws g 3 Z a9. a a .U12 a » VT v � r s Lo sy� • e: 2"�u It urn u as » d e� L s a q ^Y.a 7Is. eS yy■ C6 c L Y ! a 2y e3,= nit Y. CyY CV YyO w6 !rW O•�S CAL '3. Iva . W u y$ s4 �y r +.1 Yas Y t L e Aws . IO L 2e8 Si C i Y ,s . dd�jj e « Y p'f spy q4 Y Y yf� EL ,L G y C _ Qp O s 4 J V I Y N L � Y �1 c r] e — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 22, 1988 TO: Chairman and Mr -hers of the Planning Commission FROM: Bill Silva, De;w4"City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Asst. Civi; Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL ' RP 10981 t- en West Equity - A subdivision of , acres o anTinto 4-5-arce s in the reeneraRl industrial Development District, subarea No. 3, located between 7th and 8th Streets, east 00, Neliman Avenue (APN 209- 171 -58) I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of the proposed Tentative Paffiel a�i p as shown-M I hibit "B" B. Parcel Size: Parcel 2 2.76 acres Parcel 2 2,:x'6 " Parcel 3 2,78 Parcel 4 9.198 " Total TO72racres C. ixisting Zoning; General Industrial Development District, subaree, No. 3 of the Industrial Specfi( Plan �. Surrounding Land Use: North - vacant; A.T. 5 S.i,^. Railroad Tracks South - Single family East - vacant West - Existing Industrial I7EP� J TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 10961 aum 220 1988 E. Surrounding General Plan and Oevelo cnont Code Designations; or Gen- er-a)— na str> a su ar-4a South -Lov (2 -4 Du'S AC) fvelopment District East - General Industrial (subarea No,. 3) vest - General Industrial ( subares No. 1) F. Site Characteristics; The site slopes from north to south apprurimatelr 2% and consists mostly of small trees and grasses. II. ANALYSIS: The purpose of this map is to divide one parcel into three parcels for General Industrial use. Parcel I is the site for the development of RR 88.08 watch is on tonights agenda ":a planning Conyaissicn approval. Sevpntr Street hks been improved with the exception of street 'lights, drive approachas and landscaping, which is to be completed kith the deve'ionment of DR 88 -08. Eigh h Street is to be improved Full widti: including landscaping Gf twe north ::Rway upon development of parcel 1, 2 or 3. III. ENVIRDNhic'tM . REVIEW The applicant conpl�tA Part I of the Initial S u -vr °* co'� ' nd cted a fiM Investigation and completed Part II of the Iritfal Study. No adverse impacts upon the environment are anticipated az a result of this project. Therefore, issuance of Negative Declaration is appropriate, IV. SORRESPONOMF: Not #yes of Public Hearing have been sent to ss mound -n"g :arty owners and placed in t.�e Daily Report Newspaper PosOng at the site has also been compl =ted. 0701 -02 o 6-22-88 ,PG Agenda o 4-of 6 IENTAT!VE PARCEL MAP 10981 F JUNE 22,1988 PAGE 3 C V. RECOMMENDATION: it Is recommended that the R]anning Commission r consider a input and elements of the, Tentative Parcel map. if after such consideration, the Ce nni ssion can recilranend approval, then the adoption or the attached Resolution anc issuance of a Negative Declaration.,would be ppropriate.'` I Respectfully submitted, I k Sill Silva, Deputy City Engineer SS :BK:jh Attachments: Vicinity Map (Exhibit "A ") Tentative Map (Exhibit "6 ") Resolution and Recommended Conditions of Approval CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIgO NC�4 My I'I".EM:.PARCEL MAP )0941 TrME: VICINITY IAA p 1g7,�zfF] I$ a+ u sl L El". • 1 1: N I A I I v F 01199 "W Poor Quemily PARCEL �IAP NO, 10981 In mr cirr or 'Anp�= ;LA,rc(m, I, SAN mumlQtNo. TF g%K y A LVINIA PA'W" " (A PA D n.tA I VRfF3 11, A RVC DE IN. - " -5 10 ;lftWraf 4frATf, 5 nr SAM H% CaRDOR ut MMJINO cowy. r 'M A r F RAI,. HOAI) lw 4w A lj AA —PAA % ; V ' — dfi' 3 2.76 A L4,w namer me't —IS\,--) CITY OF F JKANi�.IHO CUCAMONGA ENGWMMG DMSION L f yh .4 V V VI IL 4 Mt. m8p N 1�09 vR MAP f V V VI IL 4 Mt. m8p N 1�09 nna- TENTATIVE. MAP RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING Cold aSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONiDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 10981 WHEREAS,, Tentative Parcel Map Number _:,981, submitted by Golden West Equity, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 4 parcels, the real property situated in the City, of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, Stata of California, identified as APN{q0 209- 171 -58, located between 7th and 8th Streets, East of Hellman Avenue; andl WHEREAS, on Jzjne 22,. 1988, tt. Planning Commission_ held a duly advertised public hearing for the above - described map. FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE,, T;tE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS ' SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consis,rrit with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: This Commission finds -and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in complUnce with the Ca, ;foraia Environmental Quality Act of :970 and, further, thi4 Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 10981 is hereby approved subject to the attached Standard Conditions and the following Special Conditions: i I. Improvemeiat of 8th StreQ' shall be as follows: a. cull width improvements including the landscaping on the north side across the entire length of the parcels fronting 8th Street, shall be construciad to the satisfaction of the City, Engineer upon development of parcel 1, 2 or 3. 7r b., Parkway.imp`ovements on the south side shall be constructed on a parcel �y parcei basis upon development of, each parcel, c. An improvement certificate shall be placed upon the final map for items a and b above. 2. Existing Overhead Utilities a. 8th Street - The existing Overhead utilities (telecommunication) on the project side of 8th Street shall be underground fr�°the first pole off -site east of the east parcel. map bouran-;.y to the first- pole off -site west of the west parcel or boundary _upon development of Parrel 1 2 or 3. An imrpr,, ,-ment certificate shall be placed od the final map noting the above. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one -half the City adopted cost for undergrounding. I from future development rredevelopment) as it occurs on the north side of the b. On -site Electrical Existing overhead utilities located within, a Southern California Edson easement extending through _parcels 1, 2 and 3 shCtl be underground4d from the first pole off -site east of the east Parcel Map boundary to the first pole off -site west of the west Parcel Map boundary upon development of parcel 1, 2 or 3. An it:.wovement certificate shall be placed on the final map noting the TW above c. Railroad lines - An in-lieu. fee as contribution to the future undercrounding of the ' existing overhead Railroad Communication lines located within the railroad right,•of -way to the north shall be paid to the city upon development of each Parcel. The fee shall be one -half the City adopted' unit amount times the length of the entirh project frontage. 3. A_ separate parkway landscape and irrigatio►, plan per City Standards shall be provided ,ub$ect to approval of the City Engineer for the north side of 8th Street. This landscaped parkway is required to be annexed Into the landscape aaintenance district. 4. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided as follows: a. Between Parcels 1 and 2 on 8th Street, 1 b From the proposed drive approach on Parcel 3 on 8th Street to the property to the east, c. From the existing drive approach on the property to the west an 7th Street to Parcel No. 4, and d. from the easterly drive approach on 7th Street located on Parcel No. 4 to the property to the east. 5. Prior to issuance of building permits, provide a drainage study to verify that 7th Street has capacity to serve the proposed development. IF necessary, Master- Plan Storm Drain Line 6J shall be installed as approved by the City Engineer �1nd shall be eligible for standard master plan facility cost -rimoursement. APPROVED AWD ADOPTED THIS DAY OF 1986, PLANNINC COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ` BY: arry c e , a r-man ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by ;the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meetino !of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of Jim, 1988, by the followf,tg- vote -to -wit: AYES: COK41SSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: i j 8 0 r y C A rb 4 R 4 CL SW 2 y !a NL 'T w. L O G fig C~ pQK� G �YO= qL- L s0 � � OuC •pc =. � L W O 4s `•, pq � N,•n all Y g�wY o� C Y �i$ 4. V N tt\ yb L p c b L p[ q`v 4 •CL �� J�Y � ;w Yw uAu we !� •yip A. M` gM34iOS+y4M 3331 uw. �.K 9C,gY Y•d�: �C F1r` � etc y � � V ` s, o � r��••• C� C � m R • m W l� Y ~ rW ^ ` ��p C rCp.4 �u u y� {. 6�d•G NV �...O ` YY��yWy •R+MV y�pj� pp� NLi1 :.i•R O Y �'� r y � yN ` v s O alb ( • •� �� Mw 1 g {Y� �• CC .�1 �.� v .Yi:li r� 4s `•, pq � N,•n �C Y g�wY o� w Y M L c b L p[ 777�i��i�i�ijjj yy�� R 4 � � y � � V ` s, o � r��••• C� C � m CM � � �.u. •. Y �. � ~ � � � Y r y � yN ` v s O Y ► • N4 Mw O O � 0 �L. YAM° Y Ny �qa Mid � L g {Y� �• CC .�1 �.� v .Yi:li r� 1 Ak q Qylama� poor Qwaw N O 1` 4 V C fie 6G Ww yG~ °1 v> W eC �L d y Cam. OV p��` 21% .. ...0 °°; iy giY Cby� a 440 �6T K�D Q.YY¢ p`.jy. °Il. ay :b Yb Nq wp w G= �y `p gft. z Duc.ec r04 Ti + QQ M s HE4 t Alk I — lw 1 Ak q Qylama� poor Qwaw N O 1` 4 6G Ww yG~ °1 v> Cby� a 440 �6T K�D Q.YY¢ p`.jy. t CITY OF RANCHO CUCA..MONGA STAFF REPORT f DATE: June 22, 1988 � ITO: V iirman and members of the Planning Commission PROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Miki Bratt, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT E-ZONE-) 1ER�reque5 to pre -zone a 96 acre portion o e °n'ard3no County unincorporated area (for pre - zoning purposes) to Cow Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) located at the northwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street APN 225 - 071 -65. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT A;REEMENT 88 -01 - a—request o approve a aevelopment agreement or development and annexation of a 96 acre portion of San Bernardino County unincorporated area (for annexation purposes) located at the northwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street - APN: 225 - 071 -65. I. ABSTRACT: As part of the proctss of annexing to the City, the app-iicart is requesting approval of an annexation agreement and pre - zoning of 96 acres of land northwest of the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street.. The pre -gone density of 2 -4 dwelling units per acre is consistent with the General Flan designation. The Development Agreement affirms the General Plan intensity of use for the parcel, guarantees the intensity of development for a period of seven years and requires the developer to participate in the financing of needed infrastructure, including fire, drainage, and traffic fac,lities. II. LOCATION: The site is located in the vicinity of the north -zst corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street (see Exhibit 013). General Plan Land Uses are: North - Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) South - Very Low Density Residential (less I'Lan 2 dwelling units per acre) East - Very Low Density Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) West - Utility Easement /open space ITEMS P. Q PLANNING COMMISSION eTAFF REPORT I DEVELOPMENT p,siRICT AMENDMENT 88-06 June 22, 1988 Page 2 Development District Designations are: I North - County of San Bernardino Residential (up to 2 dwelling unfits per acre) South - Etivanda Specific Plan East- Coum`y of San Bernardino; Residential (up to 2 dwelling units per acre) West- County of San Bernardino; Utility Easement III BACKGROUND: The applicant requests approval of a request for pre - z n ng o a 96 acre parcel of land to Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre and approval of a Development Agreement for the purpose of duelopment and annexation to the City. The parcel is now locatod in the unincornorated area of San Bernardino County. On June 1, 1988, the City Council approved a resolution of intention to ^ronex this portion of land. An annexation application has been fil with the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO). IV. ANALYSIS: Pre- Zoning; The property is presently unincorporatAd in the County -- — of anBernardino subject to the County General Pan, the West Valley foothills Community Plan, and the County Development Cnde.. The County General Plan designation Is residential with a permitted density up two dwelling unit, ,-j per acre, The West Valley Foothills Community Plan requires development under Planned Unit Development standards. Under the County Development Code standards the base zoning under the General Plan be may increased by an earned density bonus of up Lv 25 percent. The City General Plan designation is Low Density (2 -4 dwelling units per acre). The applicant request for pre - zoning of 2 -4 dwelling units per acre is consistent with the City General Plan designation. Development Agreement• Since the area is now entirety vacant with no ava. a e n ras ructure, the .agreement spells out the current infrastructure -requirements placed on development in the City, as well as m_chanisms available for financing that infrastructure. The agreement also, in effect, guarantees that the intensity of development anticipated by the General Plan will remain available to the developer for a period of seven years. The following points are specified in the Development: Agreement: o Densit,r The agreement verifies that the General Plan Designation is Low Density (2 -4 dwelling units per acres: and that the site will be pre -zoned to Low Density ( ?y. dwelling units per acre). E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDKENT 88 -06 June 22, 1988 Page 3 o Develo ent: The site may be developed up to three awelling units per acre, calculated by City method of calculation, however, the developer may apply for any density within the standard, of the low residential zone. o Infrastructure Financi�ngg Upon request of the developer, e city 0 use serest efforts to implement available financing mechanisms, including one or more Mello -Roos districts and landscape ;end lighting districts. o Landscape and Li htinr Distric�t Developer agrees to n —a anT � cape end "T' gt kiting district. o Fire F- 11ities: Developer agrees to participate in a e o- oos dist ict for fire facilities. o Drainage Facilities: If required by the City, developer agrees o par ci- pate in a Mello -Zoos district for drainage facilities. o Streets: Developer agrees to construct streets_ to City s an ards (includes relocation of Etiwanda Avenue). o fees: Developer agrees to pay City's park fees and all o er City fees. o Reimbursement: Developer m�.y receive a credit against requ r ra nage fees and systems development fees, however, such reimbursements are narrowly defined by the agreement. o Duration: The agreement runs for seven (7) years. V. ENVIRONMENTAL: An environmental assessment has been completed by staff. a verse effects have been ident;'fied as a consequence of the Development District Amendment or the Annexation Agreement. Therefore, the Planning Commission should Mcaamend approval of a Negative Declaration under tine California Environmental Quality Act. VI. FACTS: The following findings can be made for the pre -zone determination: (a) That the 96 acre property is suitable for a master planned . residential development and is compatible with the existing General Plan designatiort for the land use in the surrounding area; and Fy�t�- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF kPORT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMVIOMF.NT 88 -06 June 22, 1468 Page 4 (b) That the proposed development designation will not have a significant impact on the environment, and - (c) That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the J General Plan designation of Low Density Residential (2 -4 j dwelling units per au%re). VII. RECOMMENDATION: If the Planning Commission agrees with the above facts, the Commissf]A should adopt the attached resolutions in su,port of the Development Agreement and Development District 1 Amendment. Res .idly sub ed, B d Sul Cit n er BB:MB:mlg Attachments Exhibit "1" - Location Map Exhibit "2" Project Site Resolution Recommends Approval of Development Agreement 88 -01 Resolution Recommends Approval of an Amendment to the Development District Map 88 -06 U old a z a Ul m a =z _ u=+ 11 0 Z'� N LAJ IL W A Z a •pi 6i T' N anv3AV °s i t/13?3dMlt3 r Jus N N Opp' I YJ;= I , 1 a pp \ ( a< a az W ° Ui a LU LU t y W ILI N v h Qs. VOGx. I3nN3AV AmNwH ur PLANNING _ DIVISION EXit3lf: _ I ALE: N P RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMt-AGA PLANNING COMMISSION REC"ENDING fFPROVAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT, DDA 88 -06 REQUESTIW TO AREND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP FOR THE PURPOSE OF UNITES PER PER ACRE)F OR DENSITY ACRES SOFA LAND LOCATED AT LTHHEE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND 24TH STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APN: 225- 071 -65 A. Recitals. District Amendment eNo. 80-M lcahs e described ein athePtitletof this Resolution• Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On Commisson of the Cit of Rancho Cucamn gat conducted a meeting on the the applicaticnn and i concluded said meeting on that data. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, aitermined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows. set forthlin the 7Recitaliss Part Aeof hiss Resolution are all of the facts 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting on June 22,' 1988, incluWing written and oral staff reports, thfi s Commission hereby specifically finds as f1 lows: (a) The application applies to 96 acres of Land, located at the northwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street and is presently undeveloped land in the unincorporated area of San Bernardino County, Said property is within the Rancho Cucamonga Sphere of influence and is designated by the General Plan as Low Density Residential (2 -4 Dwelling Units per Acr &); property to the north of the subject site is designated Residential, County of San Bernardino, (up to 2 Dwelling Units per Acre) and is undeveloped; the property to the west is designated utility ea;iement, County of San Bernardino and is vacant; the property to to east is designated Residential (up to (2- Dwelling Units per acre) and is undeveloped; and the property to the south is within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, designated Etiwanda Specific Plan and is undeveloped. PUNNING Comma REsoLUTION NO. ODA 88-06 MELCHER June 22, 1988 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantir,l evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting an(( upon the specific findings of facts set rorth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: .'a) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and (h) That the proposed use is in accord with tl1 objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and (c) That the; proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; aid (d) That the propose) use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the pubic health, safety, or welfare, or, materially injiriogs to properties or improvements in .t vicinity; 4. This Commission hereby finds and cv tifies. that the project ha% been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby recommnds issuance of a Vegative Declaration, S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above this -- vnission hereby recommends Tpproval cf Development District Amendment 8806 on the 22nd day wf tune, 1988. 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DA" OF JUNE, IS98, PLANNING COWIS$ION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO cueMOL A 8Y: Larry e , a sown ATTEST: Brad Buller, epu y Zcre Dry K] PLAPNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ODA $8 -0E - MELCNER June 2c, 1988 F. ge 3 I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretavy of the Planning Connnission of the City of Rancho Cucamorga,.do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and'adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of JuRe, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ENdIRONMENTAL ASSESSMZ', AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 88 -01 - TERRACE MELCHER, FOR ANNEXATION AND 9EVELOPMENi OF A 96 ACRE PORTION OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY UNINCORPORATED AREA LO:ATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND 24TH STREET, APN 225 - 071 -65. A. Recitals, (i) California Government Code Section 65864 now provides, in pertinent part, as follows: "The Legislature finds and decl,)res th %at: "(a) The lack of nertainty in the appro4 i of development ;projects can result in a waste of resources, escalate the cost' of housing and other developments to the consumer, and discourage investment in and commitment to comprehensive planning which would make maximum efficient utilix4tion of resources at the least economic cost to the public. "(b) Assurance to the applicant for a development project that upon i, approval of the project, the applicant may proceed with the project in accordance with existing policies, rules aria regulations, and subject to conditions of approval tofll strePgthen the public planning process, encou;•age private participation in comprehensive planning, and reduce the econor =ic costs f of development." (ii) California Government Code Section .65865 provides, in pertinent part, as follows: 'Any city..., may enter into a development agreement with any persun having a legal or equitable interest in real property for thQ development of such property as provided in this article...," follows: (iii) California Government Code Section 55€365.2 provides as "A development agreement shall specify the duration of the agresme-rt, the permitted uses fif the property, the density oi- intensity of use..." (iv) Atta.hod to this Resolution, marked as Exhibit "I", and Incorporated herein by this re'ererce, is a proposed Development Agreement concerning that property located at the northwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street. Hereinafter in this Resolution, that agrgement attached hereto as Exhibit "1" is referred to as "the Development Agreement." (v) On June 22, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamon;)a held a duly noticed public hearing concerning the prnposed Development Agreement and concluded said hearing on titai date. (vi) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFQRE, it is hereby resolved by the Planning Commission of the ,ity of Rancho Gud&gnga as follows: 1. In all respe4 a as set forth in Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution. 2. In conjunctiea with this Development Agreement, an initial Study and Preliminary Environmental Assessment, in conformity with the requireients of the Califoonia Environmental Quality Act, has been prepared. The Planning Commission has deteE',-ined that this project would not have a significant advec•se effect on environment, and hereby recommends a finding of no significant impact and the issuance of a Negative Declaration by the City Council. a. The Planning Commission specifically finds that: AUL (ar) That the 96 acre property ie suitable for a master planned residential development and is compatible with the existing General Plan designation for the land use in the surrounding area; and (b) That the Development District pre -zone will net have a significant imract on the- envij:�nments and (c) That this agrnament is in conformance with th* Ge�_aral Plan designation of Low Density Residential (2 4 dwelling unit; per acre). 4. The Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of the Development Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "P. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 1.9$$. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITa OF RANCHO t;UCPliONG.". SY: ahrryy r. Mcc iel , L' nai rman ATTESTS —11rad-8pHler, Deputy Secretary I,' Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Comission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning ComrAission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular,Meeting of the Plaining,Commission held on the 22nd dey of June. 1988, .by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS �e V j; RECORDINnRT QUESTED BY AND WHEN RECGRDJrD MAIL TO,- Beverly A. 2luth6let' City Clerk " City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. BoX 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CONCERNING THAT PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER, OF ET =NANDA AvENIIE AM 24TH STREET '. THIS AGREEMENT is, made and entered into as of the thirty -first day following final adoptior of the ordinance approving it :hereinafter, the "Effective Date") by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation ("City" hereinafter) and DoRi5 DAY, FRANK DE VOL and GRACE DE VOL (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Developer "). A. Recitals. (ij California Government Code Section 45884 provides as follows: "The Legislature finds and declares that: "(a) The Zack of certainty in the approval of development projects can result in a waste of resources, escalate the cost of housing and other development to the con,x� er, and discourage investment in and Commitment to l r400 JV �JVH167— � comprehensive planning which tYould male maximum efficient utilization of resourcoa at the least economic cost to the public. "(b) As to the applicant for a dev4:1- tipment project that upon approval, of the project, the applicant may proceed with the project in accordance with existing policies, rules and regulations, and subject to conditions of approval, will strengthen tlZe public planning process, encourage private participation�in comprehensive planning, and rkAace the economic costs of development." (ii) California Government code Section 65865 provides in pertinent part 4s follows; 1 "Any city, may enter into a development l agreement with any person having a legal or equitable j interest in real property for the development of such property as provided in this article.. +� (iii) California Government Code section 65865.2 provides as follows: "A development agreement shsll specify the duration of the agrequent, the permitted uses of the property, the density or intensity of use, the maxk:ium height and size of proposed buildings, and provisions for reservation or i dedication of land for public purposes. The development agreement may include conditions, terms, restr�.ct -Dons, and requirements for subsequent discretionary action, pzovided f 2 1. that such conditions, terms, restrictions, and requirements for subsequent, discpetionary act' ans slail not prevent development alf the .and for the uses and to the density or intensity of development set forth in the agreement, The agreement may provide that construction shall be commenced within a sP6cified time and that the project or apy phase thereof be completed within a specified time." l (iv) lteveloper owns fee title: in and to that real property consisting of approximately 96 acres generally located at the northwest corner of Etiwanda Avanue!nd 24th Street in the unincorporated area of San Bernardino County nov Pro Posed for annexation to City. Said property is Regally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and hereinaftet is referred to as "the Site." - j (v) City "s general plan designation for the Site is low density residential (two to four units per acre). Developer and City desire to provide through this Development Agreement specific development criteria to be applicable to the Site upon its annexation to City which will provide for maximum efficient utilization of the Site in accordance with sound planning principles. + (vi.) This Agreement is entered into pursuant to the Provisions of Article 2.6 of Chapter 4, Title i'of the California Government Code commencing with Section 65864 thereof. 3 c E! �, Aar4e+meat. NOW, MR£FORE, the, .parties heret\,,) agree as follows- 1. The parties hereby agree that City's zoning and ,rezoning designation for the Site hereby is deemed to be lour residential (L) subject to the specific terms and provisions hereof which shall supersede conflicting standards and requirements of the low residential (L) district so long as this agreement is in full force and At�act. The duration of this Development Agreement shall be seven (7) years following the Effective Date, that is, upon the expiration of the seven (7) year period commencing immediately after the Effective Date,, if Developer has not then Performed construction work on the Si'2e or any portion or portions thereof pursuant to a building permit or permits issued by City, the '1;ite or any such portion or portions thereof shall theta be deemed ? ,ho be zoned low residential (L) and the development Of the Site then and thereafter shall be governed accordingly by the then current provisions of the City's Zoning ordinance as to L zoning or the then applicable specifir� plan and/or zoning category succeeding thereto. For the Zrkegoing Purpose, construction work shall not include prepar�i'tion of plans, engineering work or grading. 2. The following development standards and conditions shall govern the development of the Site during the terns hereof, subject to the provisions OZ paragraph 1 ht)reinabovez f 19.1, the Municipal Improvoment Act of 1913, the Improvement Bond Act Of 1915, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, and any and ,t all other available proceedings to provide for public corduit financing for the construction of Public improvements rewired as a condition to davejapment of the Site or any portion 0- Portions j thereof. I r C. In lieu of the dedication of land located within the Site, Developer shall pay City's park fees required due to the residential development of the Site. Said park fees shall be calculated is accorlar --e with standards in affect at the' time any such fees are due and owing. As to residential development within eny final tract, said park fees shall be payable for a lot contained within a final tract when City releases utilities for occupancy of that lot for residential,:use. 5 t� A. City hall y i3 llow the Site to be developed to a density of up to three (3) dwelling units per acre, calculated in accordance with 'City's method of calculation specified in its Development Code as of the Effective Date. Developer may apply for any density within the standards of the ?ow residential (L) zone. B When and, of requested. by Developer from time to time, City shall use its best efforts to initiate and 'process to completion prodsedings pursuant to the Mello -Roos Community Facilitiesi Act of 8,1, the Municipal Im rovens an t Act o D. Subject to subparagraphs 2.E and F hereinbelow, Developer shall pay any and all City fees required as a result of development of the Site, or any portion, or portions thereof, at rates current at the time payable, including, put not limit, =d to, beautification fees, park fees, systems development fees, building permit fees, plan check fees and drainage fees. E. Developer may request and City shall extend to Developer credit against required drainage fees only to the extent of Developer0s direct construction costs incurred in j constructing permanent 24th Street Master Storm Drain drainage facilities required by City as a condition of developing the Site or any portion or portions thereof. t F. Developer may request and City shall extend to Developer credit against required systems development fees only to the extent of Developergs direct construction costs incurred In constructing oversized facilities (i.e., facilities sized to service areas located outside of the Site) which are not located within the Site, or abutting the Site. However, if traffic signals are required by this development, the Developer shall be entitled to credit against required sl--stems development fees to the extent above the Developer's fair share. Further, if City requires the improvement of Etiwanda Avenue between 24th Street and Highland for interim direct access to the Site, no costs thereof shall be reimbursed to Developer, 6 0 G. Developer shall consent to the creation of an assGssment district or districts to provide for the construction and maintenance of any and all lighting and landscaping within public rights -of -way within the site or abutting the Site pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 , if applicable, Developer shall consent to an annexation or annexations of the Site or any portion or portions thereof to an existing assessment district formulated under. said Act for that purpose. H. If required by City as a condition of, development of the Site or any portion or portions thereof, Developer shall consent to the application of the Mello -Roos Facilities Act of 1982 thereto to construct and maintain facilities and/or to purchase and maintain equipment reasonably necessary to provide fire protection services to the Site or the applicable portion or portions thereof. I. If required by City as a condition of development of "Up Site or any portion or portions thereof, Developer shall %zonsent to the application of the Mello -Roos Facilities Act of 1982 thereto, or Developer contribution of equivalent funds, to construct regional drainage facilities. 4. Bxcept as expressly modified herein, all substantive and procedural requirements and provisions contained in City's ordinances, specific plans, rules and regulations, includin-,., but not limited to, its Development Code, as amended, 7 r building coder electrical code, fire code and plumbing code shall apply to the development of the Site pursuant to `:his Development Agreement. Further, any terms or phrases contained herein for which there are definitions provided in city's said Development Code shall be deemed to be utilized in accordance with those definitions. 5. In accordance with California Government Code Section 65868.5, a certified copy of this Agreement shall be recorded with the Recorder of San Bernardino County, California, immediately upon this Agreement becoming effective. 6. The parties further,agree as follows: A. Except, as expressly set forth in this Agreement, no representations of any kind or character have been made to one another by any of the parties hereto or by any of the parties' agents, representatives, associates or attorneys with respect to each subject to which this Agreement relates. B. This Agreement contains the entire agreement . of the partiea, with respect to each subject to which it relates. C. This Agreement can only be amcaded in writing, which writing must first be executed by all of the parties hereto. D. No provision of this Agreement may be waived, except in writing, which writiiiq must be executed by all of the = parties hereto. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAMONGA Dated; - ----_. __ By Mayor . Z. The parties hereto each egree that they ,hall execute and deliver to the other,,, Upon requewt so to do, any and all documents reasonable and necessary to accompiisah .ir evidence the agreements contained in or contemplated by this Agreement. F. Tr< the event that any partly should default in one or more oz its obligations provided in or .;Qntemplated by this Agreement, the defaulting ;-rty shall pay to the xither all expanses incurred in Connection With -- ftcrts to enforce'- `:Duch Obligation, including reasonable attorneys, fees, whether or not suit be commenced. G.` 'Chis Agreement, all other documents and agreements provided in or contemplated hereby, and all rights and obligations arising therefrom shall be binding upon and inure to AML the benefit OX the parties hereto- and their respective heirs, represontativets, successors and assictns. IN WITIJS WHEFtEDF, the parties have executed and entered into this Agreement as of the effective data of the I ordinance approving this Agreement. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAMONGA Dated; - ----_. __ By Mayor . r i Dated: Doris Day Dated: Frank IIe Vol Dated: Graf STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO On this day of , 1988, before me, State, . a Notary public in and for said personally appearrd _ 4 known to me to Sae the Mayor of the City of Rancho cgcamonga, .a munt-ipai corporation, and Beverly Authelet, known to me to be the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Yucamohga, a municipal corporation, and said p6Nrsons are known to me to be the persons who executed the within instrument on behalf of the City of Rancho nucamo,ga and acknowledged to me that the City of Rancho Cucamonga :hereby executed th;i sa a�. WITNESS my hand and official seat,. Notary Public in and for said state 10 p STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ss' On , 198L, before ma, the undersigned, a Notary public in and for said State, personally appeared Doris Day, know-in to me to be the parson whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that she executed the same, WITNESS my he;nd and official seal Notary.Pual e. in and for said state STATE OF CALIPORNI.$ ) COUNTY OF ; ss. On , 1988, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public nand for said State, personally appeared. Frank Lie Vol, known to me to be the parson whose name subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that he the same. WITNESS my hand: ai :,A official seal. Notary 3:ublrc and for sad state STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) COUNTY OF ss.. On , 1988, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public n and for said State, personally appeared `.race De Vol, mown to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within ' instrument and acknowledged that she executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public In and 10 sajd state r ! \S \131 \DAYDA\r,.C. 6.21 11 JI' RANGI�O CUG.AIrIGi1GA " STAFF REPORT ek,,- I I DATE: June 22, 1983 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Com Assion FROM. Brad Buller; City Planner BY: Chris Westman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL. USE PERMIT 88 -13 - Ine eve opmen o a ve s orb• o ice building to aling 74,697.sgvire feet on approximately 2 acr45 of lam in the indu- )l Pavk District, Subarea 6, and 'the Haven Avenue dy District„ located at the southeast corner of Ha dz,- avenue and Arrow Route APN: 209- 142 -16, TREE REMOVAL PERM17 88 -31 - CRHO - A request to removo2 approx ma e y ma ure rees n conjunction with the development of are office structure at the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Haven Avenue API: 209 - 142 -16. I. PROJECT AND SITE, DESCRIPTION: A. Action, Re quue�e__s__t��e�__d: 'Approval of Site Plan, elevations, and con ons,�l_ -tree removal permit, and the issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zonin olrrflh - Re__�i, n er; n us rial !2 cific Plan - Subarea 6 - Industrial Park South Vacant; Industrial Specific Plan — Subarea b - Industrial Park East - 'Vacant; Industrial Specific Plan - Subarea S Industrial Park West - 'Vacant ;'Industrial Specific Plan - Subarea 6 - ;Industrial Park General Plan Desi nations: ro ee .e -' n us r aT park North - Commercial South - industrial Park East - Mdustriai Park West - Industrial Park 'P PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88 -13 - CRHO June 22, 1988 Page 2 D. Site Characteristic,: The two acre site is part of an approxima e- y acre Master Plan which encompasses land froi;l Arrow Route to Jersey Boulevard and Haven Avenue to Utica Avenue. Arrow Route and Haven Avenue are Special Boulevards as designated in the General Plan and have special setback requirements. The site is generally vacant with some mature tre4s that ware planted in conjunction with the previous temporary Empire Bank. The site has an approximate 1,5 percent slow to the south. Street improvement3 have not been completed on Arrow Route. E. Parking Calculations: Net Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Eaotage Ratio Required Provided Office 581-800 1/250 275 276 II. ANALYSIS: A. Background: The proposal is closely related to A project which a u s s: parcel on the east and south. That project, Development Review 88 -04, received approval from the Planning Corn on May 11, 1988. A specific condition relating to the design of do -site circulation for DR 88 -04 is contingent upon a Site Plan approval for CUP 88 -13. B. General: The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan ana Tffe_ Haven Avenue Overlay District. The use and project design are compatible ttith future and existing projects in the immediate vicinity. A traffic study has been prepared to address on -site and off -site circulation concerns. As a result, a continuous right turn lane will be required for the crest property boundary on Haven Avenue. In addition, for sight ling purposes, limited use areas" shall be designated on the final detailed Irrigation and Landscape Plans as shown in Exhibit H '(Special Condition No. 10, Engineering). Reconfiguration of the drive aisle intersection also shown in Exhibit 1IN ", is subject to City Planner and City Engineer approval (Special Condition No. 1, Engineering) both for this project and for Devalopir—unt Review 88 -04. A four way stop shall be provided to r.:itigate the reduced sight distance at the intersection of the tva drive aisles/,'(Special Condition No. 11, Engineering) due to vehicles exiting the lower level of the parking structure, as shorn on Exhibit "I". PLANNING CO{NISSION RESOLUTION NO. 'ONDITION!'.!. USE PERMIT 88 -13 CRHO June 22, 1988 Page 3 Related t_;- .tut not addressed in the traftft study and of concern to :staff, is that the tower level of the parking structure has a single vehicular access point- The proposed turf block emergency access is located very close to the single acces!; point. That „paration' may no "-, be sufficient to provide' an alternate vnhicul, route in the event of an accident, or other emergency which blocks the primary access. Secondary access could be provided. by means of Nzmps located as far from I the primary access point as possible. As the issue of the single vehicular access Zoint was discussed in Technical Review, the Sheriff's aepartiment and foothill Fire District did not voice particular concern. Although a technical issue, the points of access were discussed at Desigla Review, and the COW - ittee accepted the single access point desist. However, Engineering staff and the Design Review Committee felt that at a minimum, the single access, should be widened to 40 feet, to allow for an emeiijency exit lane. C. The applicant is requesting a Tree Removal Permit to remove the 10 existing trees planted by Empire Bank. The t: aes on -site seem healthy but should receive evaluation by an arborist in order to determine the possibility of retaining the trees and relocating them on sfte. Those trees located within the parkway along Haven t:.mue will be required to be removed due to the increased turn lane. Technical and Design Review Committees have reviewed the Project and have made recommendations for conditions of approval. D. nesi n Review Committee: The Committee (Mcniel, tolstoy, 4o &man rev ewe t:l p "rojeet on dune E, 1988 4nd ma:e the following recommendations: PA 1he Ingress /Ogress lane to the lower parking -?rea should be... expanded to three lanes, 4,n feet minimum. 2. Planter fingers should be provided within the parking lot at the end of parking rows. 3. Additional pedestrian space should be provided at ground level adjacent., to the building on the south and east sides of the building by recessing the glazing enough to accommodate a pedestrian colonade. S-3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONAL USE PERMMIT 08 -13 - CRRO June 22, 1988 Page 4 4. The position of the trash enclosure should Be adjusted to provide for better trap`,r'bin access and maneuvering. 5. Canopy trees should be provided within the deck parking area and plaza areas. 6. All trees far the project: should be box -sized specimens 10 compliment the building mass. 7. Landscaping at the southeast corner of the parking deck should take sight lines into consideration. 8. The Committee strongly encourages public art to be provided at the northwest corner of the building. Exclusive of publicly dedicated right -of -way,. the project provides approxiirately 30 percent landscape and hardscape coverage. The industrial area r�quiras a minimUm of 25 percent net tot area for pedestrian hardscape plazas and courtyards and landscape areas. In addition, a maximum 5 percent credit ti-aard the required landscape /hardscape coverage may be permitted where appropriate public art is displayed in a setting which enhances pedestrian spaces and building architecture. E. Environmental Assessment: Parts I and II of the Initial Study ave een completed. o significant impacts have been found related to the construction of this project. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: the busiding's design and Site Plan, together with ic e recd mren ed condi'tions of approval are in compliance with the Development Code and ocher applicable City standards. IV. CORRESPONDLNCE: This item has been advertised ils a public heci - -ing to ne a Qyye ort newspaper and all property owners within "300 feet of the 50-ec -'area have beer, notified. In addition, public hearing notices have been posted or, the subject property. i I G t PLANNING COMMISSION RE$OLUTION N0. CONDITIONAL US[ PERmir 88-13 CRHO June 22, 1988 Page 5 V. RECOMMENDATION: 5tAff recomw:nds that the Planning Commission approve Conditional1l , Use Permit 88 -13 through, adoption of the attached Resolutio,' of Approval with conditl'bns and issue a Negative Declaratiq'n, Resp ;lly su ed, i r r Cityer; , BB : CSI: to Attachments: Exhibit "A" - toaster Plan /Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Lower Level Parking Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Elevations Exhibit "E" - Elevation: Details Exhibit "F" - Section /Perspective Exhibit "G" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "H" - Limited Use Areas Exhibit "I - Sight Distance Constraint j Resolution of Approval i i i - y r 1. 4 J�• -� i �i FC i f �� . s f IE W f 7 O E r I� 2 �s s—. J 1 r , n L�J � a � j i -�T ®1 r I C C C` 4 Rl rt i~. I A . ea, k �c, Haar 7 OII 13 'M-M E� 0 L79 �Ojl Eiji �4 I Q as ij i 1 f a w n A 00 x u r r r C O K Y M Z <i w * 0 ' f n C� t 3 S ' � O F n r , 1 N7AYR 00- �r e a e °t 111 Z Z a. g C V Z fJ 111 ' �1rlt.w QPM f cup s4 I • a 0 CM op MN I it = 101 ,t' a UP ExmalT-. it _a. 5n -:4 mi i I I RM& UP C-Is nc RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO C11CAi7ONGA PLANNING C0144ISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE Fc}`MIT NO. 88 -I3 rOR A FIVE STORY OFFICE BUILDING LOCATED AT THE souriwisT CORNER OF ARROW HIGHWAY AND HAVEN AVENUE IN THE HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT - APN: 2O3.t? "^-16 A. Recitals. (i) CRHO, Inc. has filed an application for the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit No, 88 -13 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application (ii) On the 22nd of.June, 1988, the Planning COMMi^,sion of the City OF Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Pesplution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 11 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth Ih the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on June 22, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property, located at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Arrow Route with a street frontage of approximately 300 feet and lot depth of approximately 300 feet; and (b) ThL, pr "operty to the north of the subject site is a retail center, the property to the ,.Ah of that site is vacant, the property to the east is vacant, and the property to the west is vacantr and (c) The property has mature trees; and within the Haven ) Avenue Overlay Districtvw ch encourages office development development. and s 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to thus Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph i and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: l r- i 6 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO CONDITIONAL. USE PERMIT 88 -13 - CRHO June 22, 1988 Page 2 (a) That the proposed use is in acce..-O with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto," will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvemens in the vicinity, (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. (d) That the site and building design satisfy the design criteria for the Haven Avenue Overlay District. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies, that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Conraission hereby issues ,a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Div ision (1) The ingressleoress lane to the lower parking area shalt be expanded to three lanes for a total of 40 feet. (2) Planter fingers, with two trees each, shalt be provided wain the parking lot at the ends of parking rows.- (3) Additional pedestrian space and landscaping shall be provided at ground level adjacent to the building on the south and east sides of the building by recessing the glazing enough to accommodate a pedestrian colonade. (4) The position of the trash enclosure shall be adjusted to provide for better, trash bin access and maneuvering. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, - NDIT ?ONAL USE PERMIT 88 -13 - CRHO June 22, 1988 Page 3 (5) Canopy trees shall be provided within the deck parking area and plaza areas. (6) All trees for the project shall be box - sized specimens. (7) Landscaping at the southeast corner of the parking deck shall take sigr� Tines into consideration.. (8) A report by a qualified arborist shall be submitted prior to issUanc's of grading and /or building pennits, end prior''to tree removal, which addresses the feasibility of -,relocation of the existing trees within the planter areas to be created by the new development. (9) Those trees which the arborist deems suitable for relocation shall be relocated accordingly. Relocated trees shall be clearly indicated on the Landscape Plans for the development project. r (10) Those trees which the arborist determines cannot be relocated shall be replaced with the largest nursery -grown trees available as determined by the City Planner. The type, size, and location of replacement trees shall be noted on the Landscape f Plans to be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. i Engineering Division (1) Construct the portion of the main drive aisle for Development Review 88 -04 adjacent to the east property line, including the drive approao;h on Arrow Route. The drive aisle design shall be. approved by the City Engineer. An off' -site construction easement shalt be obtained from the property owner to the east prior to issuance of building permits. (2) A contribution in aid of construction for the median island within Haven Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The amount of the fee shall be the City adopted unit amount for Phase II ($55) times the linear feet of property fronting on Haven Avenue (317 t feet), per Resolution No. 87 -,587. r- PLKEIING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88 -13 - CRHO June 22, 1938 Page 4 (3) The Developer shall pay reimbursement fees, per City Council Resolution No. 85 -328 executed by the Daon Corporation for the consteuction of imprr;,vements on Arrow Route, prior to the issuance o'r' building permits, (4) *''en Avenue shall be widened to provide a right- turr, lane for northbound traffic turning eastbound onto -Arrow Route. Construct the entire deceleration lane ,south of the south property line. The Developer may request a raimbursen.?nt agreement to recover the costs. of constructing, the deceleration lane from the property owner to the south upon development, The existing traffic signal at the intersection of Haven Avenue and Arrow Route shall be modified and upgraded as approved by the City Traffic Engineer, (5) Overhead Utilities Undergrounding (a) Arrow Route - the existing overhead utilities e ecm aun cations' rind electrical) on the project side of Arrow Route shall be undergroundad from the first pole on the west aide of Haverw Avenue to thet�Zirst pole east of Zhe project east boundary Ior to public improvement acceptance or occ,a' ncy, whichever occurs first. The Developei,\ may request reimbursement agreements to re¢jover one -half the City adopted cost for underr- ounding from future development (redevelo t'Y S it occurs on the Opposite side of the stet., (b) Haven Avenue - the existing ov�rrhead utilities on a pro ect side of Haven enue shall be undergrounded as follows, prig to public improve _"nt acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first: (1) Communication line for the 66KV from the first pole on the north side of Arrow Route to the first pole South of the Project South boundary;, and ?) Electrical'' line from the first pale on the - north side of Arrow Rou,,A to an on -site Pole approximately 90 feet north of the south property line, thence across. Haven Avenue to the first pole on the w£st side of Haven Avenue. n a s� PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88 -13 * June E CRHO 2;', I98$ Page 6 ( The Dev,1loper may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the difference between the undergrounding cost Of utilities ' (electrical and 66KV COMMUnication line) on, the project side of Haven Avenue minus. those (telecOwunications and electrical) on the op96'ite sida of the street from future development as it occurs oil the opposite side of the street. (6) The drive aisle along the south property line shall be constructed full width. An off -site construction easement shall be obtained from the property owner to the south prior to the issuance of building permits. (7) "Flo Stopping at Anytime" zones shalt be installed on all Haven Avenue and Arrow Route frontages. (8) The Developer shall pay reimbursement %_est for construction of street improvements and/or 'utilities underground €ng on this site by others, peiior to the issuance of building permits. (9) *,be entrance to the lower level of the parking structure shall be a minimum of 40 feet wide. (10) Limited Use Areas shall be designated on the Detailed irrigation and Landscape Plans where lines of sight for rehicles entering the perimeter drive aisles cross landscape ar!:as. Landscaping Within the Limited Use Areas ,:hall be restricted as follows: (a) The maximum allowable height for mature ground cover shall be six (6) inches, (b) Trees shall be selected such that the leaf mass is a minimum of six: (6) feet above the ground both at the time Of planting and at maturity, and (c) Tree trunks shall be located outside of the Limited Use Areas, (11) Stop signs Shall be plhced on all four legs of the intersection between the,two stain drive aisles. The fallowing items shall be show on the final detailed Site Plans R, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88 -13 - CRHO June 22, 1988 Page 6 E tat Yellow RPM on four f=oot centers extending north fr6m the intersectin, to the aisIq median and south and east br =tt the intersection as approved by the City t,:tginer, and (b) Stop signs and stop bars on all four approaches, 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to adoption of this Resolution. the APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CM OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY; AT17ST: Brad Buller, _epu y Swreza.7 I, Brad Buller, Deputy, 'Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution of was duly regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning C0ff01,s ion of City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the at a regular Meeting of the Planning C6nission held on the 22nd day of June, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS.-. y f W Z° a EI r8a"�•'so "u q. �ASY>�3e'��•s. �'Y LV.Y set y ypp �9a�i a'o ..t FVa o Yro i2..!9 pp , G O SS .113 4p Y �s viiggjrf �I � N O V = N 0 yya� i� w O p !.Fiji a'.. r La{JJ* V .0 YO �Q $LAW Q CQY 6V �a.� oY os 1'co ea 7q V O�1 NON " •Yi •�'�a L GY V Oy a�rp it ° p>p r} S+`�" �:• YO ��•b 4�"' Nep ' �` Yi�y�.W 'roc is. t�� -�G 499. a.o ►`s a si Y a� 1w • Y'Y. la V�pp �I g i ciro O`11 Y � 22b • RT i�f Y QII. A, 1M� q yr �w.Y aq � i� TIi �M {{f S y s rYVVMy Gy ff x~ a rild ro SQpy .o N yya� i� w O ` 1`y A v. NON " •Yi •�'�a ciro O`11 i ^Ma. tat; $ i SQpy .o Yw � Sol Y ~ i M !� ►- •, �. N p Qf] G, q. i r4 Ni 6wp Y yya� i� V� gaga ao Y N�� QC� 6 L w M1 V CCO yy O Cw 6� 5 g�qe+ ■ > ;�Y o C y • � W ;a 4� 6� N -c O n9 gig -u �O pp L O •. vT a • M P am- ..j S 82s • 4 r 2 __ NV•� C iFy`O�YIOY!�� A bw`y +.g am$ in. & Mn.re O@p oaf� � yyy -gzc 6 .Nw Li Y G 0 • — 1RrsJ� mw� sNN jd '1 G YigSiYw�' ��MM pY�� 9- N M _ 4 N:j I I q. 5 offiiTT I I 2a. Big j O4YO C I I $ I 3 IN u 2a. Big j O4YO 5_ k $ $ N IN N LO M ♦~ N Y Q M tl Okw Y YC� w Z i a~ 3 Q $$$ > P w. � Moa�.MV Y—�s .�J�3w w` Az yps CYV CY S�rJ,w r�N CCy O�YVM F'+•R AL ts �6 � y �•� �. a z. his S aie� •O V •gib yyo$ YO ��`�: L^�e gg�� • rOYYy y111 Yo � Ywf�w1qM wt� v M, e aad�o its L >i Ua" U yW Y N— •Y �, Oi �YO.3 BM o�p +$�'.� °�a33}5. CaYff e,.s. +inwyv Si S jig Z72 Fla= FA U nor �v t V rs o SG ix b' +r_ ,C ■qN q .G Y ` 9 i•` . S I IN N M ♦~ N Y Q M tl Okw Y YC� w Z i a~ in Q $$$ > P w. � Moa�.MV Y—�s .�J�3w w` t0/y � >.N�y yps CYV CY S�rJ,w r�N CCy O�YVM F'+•R AL I 2t-a po co. ai rdc °Cf_u `oi aC.Y+ °+nosYr.°. a. OC O Eli Y>VV ®Y yY e i °O�. Yyyya v LYO CCN �f1 ti �O gw6E0 _y3y4 uEu_LY`G��v ■ �QL Y°usC C ~I a YO.a C 4My 7!POo °Gp *V}. L C LLV ° L 5$NS 1 Y Y3 E. Awy sV •8v2 4 ---:i ~yy'yN �� C ±V A L....Z YAp. vM CNOYYM``4 t. +uS yl V.y" `7L¢ GC'OV WwNM� cV yV�G7± r ^Ev YMw Id a ;z N u c■ C L V w^ V e� N �.pC N^ ^^ X. ,-, C aO Y tof iC. N 4' w "• X11 w we)O Y NN�b aay.ON n ' u 6 1 a ! +G N Q y G -a ua^ ys �E YDgNN zN a a{_OR "ca OLO� 82. `� N�'� rte. O ^M—�NM �'�rC� �' "py0 +t Cw i N.Ci Li N.n� $'O V ;^!'o�N +y w.Q *Q N N Cep - m C;� l,syYMNY�y- Y1 ^rN� •+s. � {(!p(!Y�11�.. CN yt(?j{� ^ N,. V1 {- M N S I L• ^a R. M 0.p NNYe -O NiY iYi'_ ixe O r Q $^ ff Ci EY 4 Yv _ 1`6 ^ 9� N 1 y p I 1 F9 42 AE e a'V..M ,y V / l qq M 1 YP iY �Ni '�� i�CS ■a f� Z.-e i N�'�q r� �w �. re 81.5v Yy Ys O Nb~4. _ ■,� N' a Y.Y aw y {{py��1�.a Ly r`�q E12 N� _� Y�yf � OE� H�pr�4 YY'°!^ P f n^' ^ Qom. '� r ox w ^`a ¢ Y r1 �► ��i.� ~� a9�t� �Y.iP �'� Y y M -2 Ol i M wg ` C g r v q r My 1"y� `a •�3 "C' YL 0 Ma ,- q$j. Y t o a N y} 11 "t sy� `�� `_" ��. q YY I q ¢c V r Q '. ti$ L V• O r 0.E « V ±� N�yr ty+ _-% �Y�+ ^CNyyt� fS is V_'i r`Yi V �TOti` 6L' rr wO.` ,.�8r.}r Q.�YY'•`v `. 7-1 mN Wr�Q �' « ^. p°$ �O~' wN C9 _. $ p s a~0 P• C ,e nc E� �M � 4�•`� E TEO- �r �.y 4 � � iOt V d1 .. ^Y��ir ^t�; ^!� yaL p _D 4{V„YY Ne Nw1Y ^� Mw. <�M. C• -C 4_'w KCN tV..0.N 4Y LY�-01. tm O'low poz s.WSL�. IM «5 g� �:¢• ash 3 •yyyJ� g> yz "?Y v cog S�a� ``yYyV � Y yr wg6 Y'w �C O Y A� S 5<• V s «_ U —S -"Xlf b x Y G e �CLg� YLw Y�4. ib � M A-3. _N � p A M x k� �► _y av 3�a.�Lxw. -MH« a^ ets op+� ;g �r3G.. or U� Y Y y C w� «pY N b Als 1113 N C4 q w nj ilia p W zift {ssY� w gums Virr 6 c 5 a yym� {yq^ .5 p Y Of o. V x k� �► _y av 3�a.�Lxw. -MH« a^ ets op+� ;g �r3G.. or U� Y Y y C w� «pY N b Als 1113 N C4 q w nj e cO ZY, 2 L. I ZY^ �j Yr � N j �i Y {Y. • asY i _ qq Y N>y��i! ■yi� OVA O A yy0 ". Ni 4 V �• � Y �a yrN � Y AL 5. M z yd0 BAN 6 � l bit t i L C Y Y L� ^ CGC LC Yn LCm -C aYw 1w !G� CV Ne x1f MK +se�gC r WS w O L a� V� Aq- wwL Y q.�I L� •NaL Vc � �aL 6Yi yOd Owl- N w^. 0� RN YAO NvL 01 � r� C O Y W C Y O Y L NI I14 u . Q' X11 •l `�� El C D ilia p p zift x1f MK +se�gC r WS w O L a� V� Aq- wwL Y q.�I L� •NaL Vc � �aL 6Yi yOd Owl- N w^. 0� RN YAO NvL 01 � r� C O Y W C Y O Y L NI I14 u . Q' X11 •l `�� El C D El C D T) 3i x V Uj a cic Q. g3 a� c^ G � V s� „o V = C C Mo C FS Y G W N� L a a av -c rd� p C a C C b� xS tl �g Qg av ° .C. L n °c vvc N M 1 i9i A a� w gg pp L e Q QP ref � q ° S ... ero MN ° 3 4b ASS a 'yOO. V ra `R � a � 3� $v K = i i N Wr bevel 42i s d j �! S rs4 i s e l .- e .'s it i $ ;spi:�+ °o`; Y G y ¢ a• ° � ir` Al�g" RO p`i ��y�pYji ° VL° `° VC • pupY _�� .Or � qS yy cOO hyY NOIw N L ceaws <5 gc ■v vd+u 1E.: 2 ,j py O y L:J C 1U ,al8gy': d y. $7 yqO�a M,ieC Q •6". H S agCO t Via. Y N� V Hp� �Q S� lf1 ,aZS p =4a v V Yak 4..•�, N Vy Y Yta qg.Nj L ^ V �" � u�y � C1. N 4 y �afi� C ■per �� L y �04iq ^.= 22p CM$ °Me�y �L "Hp rji O O Q yV> a M.�ES �C •rr°i'ra Le wC.LyCm.RE y�.4 •�!C» N .� Y.. `. q�.qi�: Lp f1 41 LS M L y TO zo.St;Yim fl„ ti a ti is g3 a� c^ G � V s� „o V = C C Mo C FS Y G W N� L a a av -c rd� p C a C C b� xS tl �g Qg av ° .C. L n °c vvc N M 1 i9i A a� w gg pp L e Q QP ref � q ° S ... ero MN ° 3 4b ASS a 'yOO. V ra `R � a � 3� $v K = i i N Wr bevel 42i s d j �! S rs4 i s e l .- e .'s it i $ ;spi:�+ °o`; Y G y ¢ a• ° � ir` Al�g" RO p`i ��y�pYji ° VL° `° VC • pupY _�� .Or � qS yy cOO hyY NOIw N L ceaws <5 gc ■v vd+u 1E.: 2 ,j py O y Oliginal Poor Ou'dItf b L4 OLL Lq a�.y} !eO w VOp��O Si9 gS.y N ka. L O Oy ui a; � N ' YYyVB y .°, ",pY'M' `L G2aG ° d p C Y Cp Lu V ° y ri•�Li. 6 N >C O' O y.tlC ppy fN�p��y jy " ' Y avN YY v p y i ♦ $ Y�'9 yy9 m' Lea y e1; KYA fl O Y � wN Od LL ^�: M M� � �! � w�_ Z wp e g `F'S Q- .UK LL fig a � L is �O1pp � OgSY P �� Y.pGMsrL. N9• �� ,U �f ^yy"•.�. bE WSJ ap..� i!4S L u�L..V5L ^y �� 1 gl b�' • . a+ S4ti L� Ow aN eY CYtp g� 3MaM y.. g L SOUS A Eli ii y tr`' o b` 14$ 6 " ja 4 6� m SJ^ S / 25 $w� gp u a �� II'm V l�� wtl 6d LS 4',Lr1 ^�~ qN g Ali El GLCC Y IS ta ds� Eli Z. e g ).. q�.� Gif y QL $Y� _ Vr°°. Lie yno LAjO p �. ! GogV HG W .O C u J~ I Za - 'le( E13- LA all all Q' %Iffl nv15 a Q 'M Qualhy C N PT C i u � aLA � p¢ y 2 Y a � e 2 •s �, � � . �. d N ■■ ^ , i s L A! Pw w� Q eAm o. u HS yYAP 3. a `ucmi� eM� Xac �y' �r ti� T�i>F'y ate. �mc Z� r Y• U �� r Y 4 a n's �,yssO Y ° C s C V IL �Il$„9w„ yqam` 4 4't• _ L YYN O N O ■YywM II :�iJ ypM 11.i1 gag iwaii b w; nv15 a Q 'M Qualhy C N PT C i u � aLA � p¢ y 2 Y a � e 2 •s �, � � . �. d N ■■ ^ , i s L A! Pw w� Q eAm VyYY o s yYAP 3. a `ucmi� ,noN s�! YC$. cZ �r ti� T�i>F'y �yW 08y uK V �pu •y tn� �y CSei Elm r 4 a n's �,yssO Y V C s C V IL 4t YYIt E YYN O N O II :�iJ ypM 11.i1 !Z Are .zjja'�1 12`x+. �� MY .� NL't� �• LZJ: N #.=; N w�r� �c•'.3v" ao _$yyv N OI Ns p� O W pp� C V oc �yy�wL q99 itnW AMA '��yL• �`YY� Gw�. •• _65 ry C N � h nv15 a Q 'M Qualhy C N PT C i u � aLA � p¢ y 2 Y a � e 2 •s �, � � . �. d N ■■ ^ , i s L A! Pw w� Q eAm VyYY o s 3. 4,;— Jki s�! YC$. 5 y� �m ! �tl 08y ^� O 5 C s C V IL YYIt E YYN O N O N C. iS C1 V "s, - r - !Z Are .zjja'�1 12`x+. ICE S LZJ: N #.=; N CY Y wyy O.V. d�C pp� C V d d.VO itnW AMA 1 iI ®ELM .r CITY 1'V RANCHO CUQAMO TGA 14TE: June 22, 1988 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Corrission FROM:. Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Chris Westmon, Assistant Planner ++ SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSEMENT �1.N0 DEYElOPMEN?, REVYEVd 885 �'� i —fie eve oamen o "aT7uu qua re foot es auran7ojj 38� acres Mf land - 1 J withivr the Office Professional District, located :; the northwest; corner of I Arrow Rotate and Archibald Avenut;,y APR: 2ZS.�R1I -58. V.t" YZE 87 -06 - ")ESIGN COOPEP.ATIVE - A request to allow a redo iron n e reljU re street- side building setbacks and the average landscape seVick for 1'1,700 squire foot restaurant on 38 acres or' land within the Offici Professional District, located at the northwest corer ref Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue - APN: 208 - 831 -58. I. GENERAL•. Staff is requesting a Continuanz# of these items for two Meeks to allow the applicant sufficient. tune_ to respond to technical 'slues. Ail iteats should be cmpl-eteA' o the duly 13s 1988 Plp.nai„g Comgtissfo k meeting. J Respe;1 1�+ su red, ' _ra r �s A DATE: TO; 'ROM, BY.* SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT i o June 22, 1988 1977 Chairman and Xembers of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Debra Meier, Associate Planner f ENVIRONMENTAL AS3ESSMENT Ahj DEVELOPMENT REVIEW? 87 -35 - - e aeve oilmen a . square - oo a on an existing 9,920. square Foot industrial building, for a total square footage of 43, 476 on 2.0 acres of land in the General Indu•- "slat: District (Subarea 3) of the Industrial Specific Plan located at 8610 Helms Avenue APN 209 - `022 -10 anti 'il. I. PRUJECT AM SITE DESCRIPTION; A. Action Requested: Approval of Site Plan, Building Elevations, �cncep ua raai"rg and Landscape Plans and issuance of a Negative Oeclarattan. B. rµ„unding Land Use and Zoning: North Existing light Manufacturing use; Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 3) South - Existing i dht manifacturing use; Industrial Specific Plan (Suba1�.„ 3? East - Existing 11pv "-Linufatturing use; Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea ;1 West - Vacant irnd; Industrial S;,ccific Plan (Subarea 3) G. General Plan Designations: Project Site - General Industriai North Ganaral Industrial South - General Industrial East - General Industrial West General Industrial D. Site Characteristics: The site presently contains an existing building of Wpprox hpately Ff,200 square Feet. Both asphalt and gravel areas are currently used by employees for park,,Pg,. Curb, gutter, sidewalk and some parkway landscaping are existing along the WI ms Avenue frontage. i ITEM V a PLANNING CQ*;;SSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT 'REY F' 87 -35 June 22, 1988 Pa0e 2 _1 E. Parking Caiculatio's Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces . Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Re uired,_ Provided Office t9,250 1/250 37 37 R and D ±8,820 1/350 25 25 Manufacturing ±4,500" 1/500 29 29 Warehouse ±10,500 1/1000 10 11 Tar U ''r II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is requesting approve -1 of an ekisting in us real facility. ` The total square footag of 43,476 includes the 9,920 square foot existing structure along with the 33, 556 square feet of new construction. The Helms Avenue building elevation includes upgrading the existing elevation to create a newly developed facade. � B. Dvsi nn Review Committee- The Design Review Committee (KcNiel, oTMs _ Coleman) reviewed this project on June 1, 1988. The C, committee recommended approval of the project with the following confitions: 1. A landscape planter should be added to, the north building elevation. The planter should be approximately 2 feet wide along the existing structure and approx iAtately 4 feet wide along the elevation of the addition.' the planter should include vines and shrubs, and trees within the ' wider planter. 2. The planting area along the west property line should include continuous shrubs and trees that vi11; provide a complete seen to the rear Oilding elevation, The t� planting should be double the nomal requirement for trees along property boundaries. ? 3. A11 roll -up doors, man doors, etc., should be painted to tch the adjacent building wall. 4. Prior to issuance of building permits tite applicant shoul4 submit a revised color,sample board, The A'Pth tone color" range is acceptable, however, the Corm ttee recommended the color range be brightened. Alk PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -35 June 22, 1588 Page 3 5. The raised portion of the building parapet containing the company logo should 'be eliminated. The parapet should continue at the same level for that portion of the building. C. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review committee has reviewed a project and determined that with recamspended conditions of approval the project is carsistent with applicable standards and ordinances. D., Overhead Utilities. ' A condition has been includ_d In the ' P` IWT. approval. Resolution (No. i -a(l) and (2) under tl ..rgineering Division) requiring that the lines along the north { arm west property boundaries be placed naderground (see E.:hibit "E "). This requirement is consistent with current Commission po'iyy. However, the Commission may want to consider an exeaption In this cast because the lines are on -site end are over 500 feet from the right oY w:y of a special Boulevard. The north /couth''llne sei -vps the existing industrial building south of the project sie and east/'west line serves the existing i,,adustrial building located across the street and !r extends westerly to Hellman Avenue. f E. Enviroy:mental Asse; ;smvnt: Upon review of Part I of the Initial i 5tudy ind comPlRiou of rt Ia of the Environmental Checklist, Staff has found no significant impacts related to the development of this industrial building. III. RECOMMENDATION: Staff reco:�ends that the Planning Commission approve eye epmen Review 874K through adoption of the attached resolution and -on itions of :.pproval and issuance of c Negative Declaration. XftsBftg�$w ly suE a� Bu e a er BB :DM:mlg Attachnentt: Exhibit "A" - Location Mal) Exhibit Ile" - Site Plan Exle:k;t "C"' - Landscape Plan / ) Exhibit "D" - Building Elevatio Resolution of ApprovCl with Conditions V, ts 0 ! "I:- -czo� NORTH [CITY Or ITEM. RANCHO CUCAVXONGA MING DIVISION V EXHIBIT -oq ' I:• j j won. �e.r •a. w sri � n.» r'ws s+ 's!� .rr . �' asna :I - m 1 :. � • -M' .N may, •� 1 j..�� I! gwr as�.►..u•!. "�Is� iYin�wero fa »�.. •dr�.ay.�`o es: I I I i[1 I j I f ,\ �' � 4 - •..-,; •,.�.,. ..._ _.sa woes. � �' ..r� .' I i I i NORT OF ITEM: �RXNCHO CUCAMONGA TITI-a At" F INNING DIVIoSloll FLOC ACMT TAU rY. DAW(E' PATIO 4M SU CfAx 0 ccm r1p. ism ct.Ivam T.a Tw - -- —1 v®o,rO& AcQM C*IZM T n. couno c4mcam Pm4w4w wl X eve fta --- FLAG fW ACCW P-#Kr%ae A.VPAAL C DO T% I i Mw, A a r c ■ i D Im NORTH RANCHO ITEM: .'y ION s i "X61 C" OF IU CM OXAMR44 AmmQ - cocw ftm TW ITEM W - 07,4-. RqfNYCOH C C GA TITLE: M0020�� T PLANNING DIVISION V XI IEIT: E"- SCALE: EAST i "PLANNING DIVISION e ITEM: TITLE: /�i;► EXEIBIT:_ ._. SCALE: -- X W.. ARROW so. E, T 126' %� 312.08' 13O' TO EXSLW,. i I EI$T►lwIb li THOUSTRIAL I� E, T T To 392.10' _ E, T FLY. isnN T'"USIRI A L Ili I GEXDec ?� �tll�TOkio 66 KV - 56 Ka OR LARG✓aR E ° OTHER ELECTR CAL T - ThLECMIIh yICATMW MY OF N 4N('!-TiG tiUC"ai v'`vNGA •l:XSt'INt -� C1i�L�TY; 3.+ilaRJc.; DZMON RESOLUTION NO. A aESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 87 -35, THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 33,556 SQUARE FOOT ADDITION TO AN EXISTING 9,920 SQUARE FOOT INL:)STRIAL BOILDING, FOR A TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF A3,476 ON 2.0 ACRES OF LAND IN THE GENERA'S. INDUSTRIAL owrRICT (SUBAREA 3) OF THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC P'AN, LOCATED AT 8610 h�LMS AVENUE. - APR 209- 022 -10,11 A. Recitals. M Maury Microwave Corporazion has filed an application for the approval of Development Review No.. 87 -35 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application ". (ii On the 22nd of June 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted x meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of thi,: n,-Zsol�.tion have occurreed. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and re,3olved by th` Planning Commission of the Ci-cy of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are tr, and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting on June 22, 198C, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as fellows: (a) The application applies to property located at 8610 Helms Avenue with a street frontage of 280 feet and lot Jepth of 312.10 feet ar,d is -presently improved along Helms Avenue with curb, gutf^r, sidewalk. On -site improvements include the existing industrial facility and associated parking areas; and (b) The property to the north of the jbject site is a ligfit nanufacturinIt use, the property to the se,ith of that site consists of a light natufacturing use, the property to the easy is a light manufacturing use, and the property to the west is vacant land. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Conwissian during the above - referenced meeting and upon the epecif +c findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, ttis Ccrmissibn hereLv finds and concludes as follows:. V-10 PLANNING COWISSION RESOLUTION NO. OFF ELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -35 - MAURY MICROWAVE June 22, 1988 Page - 11 (a) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the 8eneral Plan; and (b) That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Cade and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and (c) That the proposed use i, in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the DevelopmertCode; awl (d) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thare'o, will nov be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious 7:o properties or improvemeHts in the vicinity. 4. rCJis Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality :pct of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions sat forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission he eby approves the application subject to each and every rendition set fort,; '-•snw and in tl attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorpor.. 1 herein by this reference. Planning Div ;.r ;an (1.) A landscape planter shall be added to the north building elevation-. The planter shall be approximately 2 feet wide along the existing structure and approximately 4 feet wide along the elevation of the addition. The planter should include vines and shrubs, and trees within the wicar planter. ,? The planting area along the west property line shall include continuous siarubs and tree;; that will provide a dense screen to the rear builder;:? elevation. The tree planting shall be dazble the normal requirements .fr trees along property boundaries. (3.) Al' roll -up doors, mar, doors, etc., s(.all be painted to match the adjacent building wall. (4.) Prior to i!,ajance of br:lding perilits the applicant shall submit a revised color sample board. The earth tone color range is acceptab,• however, 'ha colon range ::fall be brightened. comp�n loo shd11 be etmtrtedrti The f the luildingg parap; containing i,ha ' leve_1or tat portion of the buildiig� para(iet shall con i sue at the same �V« Q741 -Q2 ,�� 6- 22.88 PC ;Acienda PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87-35 - MAURY MICROWAVE June 22, 1988 Page 3 Engineering Division 1. Overhead Utilities a. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunication and electrical) located on -site along "he north and west project boundaries shall be undergrounded prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy whichever occurs first, as follows: 1) Along the north property line from the first pole on the east side of Helms Avenue to the first pule off- site west of the west project boundary. 2) Along the west property line from the pone at the northwest corner of the project site to the first pone south of the south project boundary. b. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Helms Avenue shall be undergrounded from the pole at the north property line of the project site to the first pole south of the south project boundary, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. c. The developer may request a r0inbursement agreement to recover one -half the City adopted cost for F dc-rgrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs to the tiu th< trid Nest sides of the project site and on the opposite side of Helms Avanvz. 2. The existing drive approaches to reowiin shall be reconstructed per City Standard Drawing No. 306. 3. The developer shall install a "Truck in only" sign at the north driveway and a "Truck out only" sign at the south driveway. The design and location shall be subject to the approval of the City Traffic Engineer. 4. A "No parking anytime" zone shall be provided in Helms Avenue along the frontage of the property. 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 19888. PLANNIK,', COMMISS70N OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCM09GA BY Larry T. ffc-Niel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary PLANNING C011HISSON KSOLUTION NO. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW $7.95 - MAURY MICROWAVE Jut': 22, 1998 - Page 4 T. Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of she Planning Commission of .;the City of K.inche Cucamonga, do hereby vertify that the foregoing Resol- -t-lor ras Oly and reg+;tlarly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commisi°r?on,';gf the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regnla`r meting of the Planning Comk�s, held on the 22nd day of Juno, 1988;; -by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: C"ISSIGHERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMISSIONERS: ANk i 1 yJ1 y® u O rake Poor �Ey1a JM. ,elN yN6 Y0 4q Oair. A OOY LqN N q q a rV Y.Cy YY`•�s uN� —� �45 � &. V� +�Y`p��0 6yi l.y uua �.s�Rw��. 4 YgN V M i �!y� y i'NNYVNW�E — YV� —m6M ills aid b V N I V /�. a L s ®� � d�J deg /�. L � d�J deg � � M.•�- �i.�INY }1 oom e r`a�a M yea � a Y1 V, J W ,a, n Y q -pal, g yy Ye �Yf y� 0's p9 :bi pall M{L. yC ;Z.1: th CA ins u" v IT i4J C "q1��• r r gA g .1 06 f L 4 V P Lii W jq�C nnC yy� IN pi.9 9. Sall rrL tl 4K gyp, A,..: A R y Hi r r M^ tl o '$ 4 r p 1 E- w a i l qG f� 11q �i 11 I cif pS «e°JAT'I Y fir4 Z.— —gill qS sox A NOSE "s s�$ s � � a 3 ® ..?�s •° r "� p'��! � ��; 'life °sy�® �.�; °�� .». ^n a� Y p i i@ 4 b ��•'° N p yg tl� �• as lit -Z WC41 H s x:j off ° _ gg�� 666 ase Y�s tl� Apw�a»e "!SQ •M u$ ante {� N Q qyy o 'Q L•4 °016 •°. @N q ya 1 1 Zqi Aw.i� y NaIN , !lOO�{e��. Yy yy yyy � y MA InG N6 Y �7 Q� yM M` yNL Ck 11� r V Is 11 7\ �1 ,91 6Poor Quality G (�•(�l GGXa. IJ \7 sd�u �.& N .Tux. �+Gy gEff gT•�.�nz'•'�o. v'�1 ��g.! .. � � >.S 'ward Yr�yL a g v pr3io 22 ^3O� a`Y ��fYLO S aL'y�;2x38ii -jt�p•`yy3 W�v'' v O�Op ^ �• ~Y ~�+ VI' NN1 y�O ^O'�IYn 0. $:E � yyz -, $ .tlag ZiN.o e.�^"yn� �. �I �S}� p Z- «� OY' •p1 �� tlp Ytl 1p0 n.OMtIN „Y�M a. q'. I tlA - n n 2, Z L. - p g S 6..jO. ..IS�.g i1 .� �A =r a•� w�� +` 4....y ^ ^N/dx gS 1u3�.� �tl� Y� ONli� �¢Y ®$ uC$C�pa'® ysn gig =tN ,ffik ®.� t$!� ptlr tl wwps 600~ yyl.�O,s 1 Cv ^Y'a yb *9 parytl�ngiLr�_'1' wlp�Mt Q ~Y'jl 2nw' �11ts LIL •pN O � ' btlY ibbtl'1pA� 6. yNyb '� SN y.� DG LPpp L wO�``i4 yyy��" �s +a� L t Y 1� Y ■ M 4 /yyy N « N O« g «Y y�=`�� •61 a ..ii !�• �9 +p«` y y tl 1YS. « VI..Ntl W 'C NA �y °aao bM� <N.iOt PWP >WOO �y31 M Y QtlP p PI 1 v Y =s at _s 3c raze Q fss_ sa �t= ! I s -.1; �€ �:g dsF 2 go Cc a v r ��i / 2-r., 1� tl °ryya ��tl$ �u ceS oP 2� 1" 2 T= E��111i3i tl r a1 3 +YS9 -ZE Ldp yp` • S ^+ '� o'.•r ptl s _m I`�� 7�� 0�� » YO•V M{i1 X11 x`M'. N ^4gOM +Y�6 0 « yL�.Ol �yy1 -Co3 L -V N�tl NL� I�nN ® ^� «. r L+Yn v C tl ` O N vy 1 y L a T; / °$ c_QN � NNa My' ^.LO �� tl <'!l .r� b. i.QN htl. pN itl 1• Ls�i.6 'cchi n�.s1. tlf:TaL PON..• <O Ci�i• saiLS�OO o e � e _ //p 1 e \� c W t ur hid -FGok Cluallty ' •1�M' YYYgS. NT yn. 13 Pi Yp C C 8 M � wY ^ Vf( M S Y-.wy N ^W atwr Yy a�Y.C.MBL u'«- w `a+. L LLLY 9 � AA .s `Y a ag =a a Hi �o a u U _ _ y � H �,O y� CUN D � .$�02 1 tv'�w UZ �ap9 e ;iL «� « +�oYN 3 vL ma OC °WL v + ! d YY .aN X12 11 J 6L OM 6LYs L� �MS gvY C/ }e TNY ib ggr if « C Z sift 0 V Yr N tl I r• x.11 1 +aye 1•2 3piy 7i;is RL a p `1i O�� a r�iq° yYm iezz 3 8 fit L + A y.. M E r y gals pN IV $ s1 P a �i. �.o d �/Nf N pmt �!M ®0r s _ NP T Y H@ ma y � lVy QS �g +'� V_9` V. °^ Oyy S y ` S ]U Z `Li— � -O qN. NE• �gy` o�.�d � y � ; a tgV} sya ^_y ywWS 1 r - ;•. �° �a f°Y Us %oil N a°r yg Y4 +. p7, V yep d • �gYM Y wyt.• ppppN 1�� yw� 6. fir ; ■$.�w� 61� yN^ Ne ya �c v$` N ° e «L .mow i.a Y aNi 3 d� °^ - a p ay ..o• rw +�. <id Q V ■ 1,.9 0 ^ B WW W O11 IY WuU U -n t\ °.• •a °wv N a 5 c � � N a. u n 4 V �� yi�c��p� NYdG � qp� H tom: jN4,° s$m.�Pg '°9 cN uL YONg3. 2�� ag Le a It s � � 12,1 11 V 1- 6C 0o� ap N �9 �ZV _ sa es 3 SE N Y N � +}, tit Ix 2 �Y TL Y a 1 vp T 20 , as r .a BIN s AK. A� m+ is 6�`� r� �► aL�gf a N`tl z!p�i ��bb�iD 6 • O! � �y {��4 ° � E LF i Co d tl N.iY I's { L V� a N g �' b Yew s . pi '�~ 6 p .r O +M h �. °Y 013 �.a1 L > O Y a t. Qa. ! O Ii=" Y VgLbM u '7i " ++o P�o =�•- >a�au aau fir' "I N wj C I ovio m-a pp": r Quality . I r 8 w ff 1qp pi L y E L � `•' L T. �1 ff pN�. fl�'S � e! o � L� S .. � �i) IV. L N �rMYY� yyy' O�» Mu c �yL N, w r� L �• �M u ytl 66� 6 6_i y �� LW��C�gw4y 1x•. LG 9 zwz N= y a r q y ~Y �'L rP` eel 12t 31 ass s —jrs a x» €« 2~ ° 901 >� N 11 1 41 :il Y ryn�yww �tl {, »Y t� p. y Mpg a` gS i$1 �V N� •�� `V fbe �YM-Ib I. V � 1� KA If� M� S l�Nft� 4��. • :W a� sit 55 Ns _ as o 'a Y U Ha 13 Sy�°t 12 fit J— N 1• i « t � � a • �. � el.k 4 Y D e X91_ » LpW -Ly �C 1L. � L V Ri QL U �. LIr°yyy^ R� < NM4M01 l ri 1 �SW i L c HE � n; v � i r. r a4 08 �3' ti Yu �o� f•G ^ p6T • a n e § §^ o s$ �} n =IV ICI � 3 °r m O5 Y �o� I I gab 1 h o a "gu y i _ -P-!v N aL. Y Y� w� r. ■ S w � s $ � �— Y Y loft V u Y n: Q Q. q � W Y. M. . L � � G u 1 •. �y �-e0�ab jxzYYY111 p tl �p iYw L w` `w..YyN {yam Yf q• Y ull N _64 M�D YQ �" `� �Va + °o lei S� r i sG1v �aM MflaA n L` Y • L i eev lift �► YY� _C ¢�� yGC O,•016'{,I tl� VeY Q. �y eOp W!� »y -y1� KW yy� �, rw..r �.. GC <= yL�M !� n` Nom: N •O� ^. '� L I tq ► Y I N • I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA vcAyo STAFF REPORT 2v�V vim: June 22, 1988 U ., 1977 I TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM; Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -SC 4 DAVIS DEVELOPMENT - The eve opmen 'o rie ware oW e` �d'#.1gs�aling 177,030 square feet on 7.8 acres of land in the Miminum Impact Heavy Industrial District, Subarea 9, located at the southwest corner of Jersey Boulevard and Rochester Avenue. APN 229- 111 -07.. 'j Associated with this project is a Tree Removal Permit 88- 36, for the removal of 3 Blue Gum Eucalyptus trees and 3 English Walnut trees. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of detail site plan, elevations, i, f T- le Rimov5T Permit 8b-36, and issuance of Negative Declaration i! B. Surrounding Land USA and Zoning: I� North - Vacant; Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial District, f Subarea 9 f South - Warehouse /Distribution Centers, Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial District, Subarea 9 East - Vacant; General Industrial District Subarea 8 West - Vacant; Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial District, Subarea 9 C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Heavy industrial North - Heavy industrial South - Heavy industrial East - General Industrial West - Heavy industrial D. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant with native grass and weeds. There ar Olive trees, 3 Blue Gum Eucalyptus trees and 3 English Walnut trees along the eastern portion of the site. The 12 Olive trees are also located within the future street right -of -way for Rochester Avenue. ITEM W PLAH,'JING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -56 - DAVIS June 22, 5988 Page 2 E. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Building A Office 5880 1/250 24 Warehouse 51518 * 33 .ST 3`% Building 8 Office 2935 1/250 12 Warehouse 51432 * 33 437 47. Building C Office 5880 1/250 24 Warehouse 59384 * _ 35 Total 376 * Parking ratio for warehouse is 1/1000 ;For 1st 20,000; 1/2000 for 2nd 20,000 and 1/4000 for square footage over 40,000. i II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The proposed project consists of three (3) industrial warffo—use buildings all lima up along Jersey Boulevard. The development of this project would require full street improveaents on Rochester ilvenue, the new street along the western boundary of the site and the extension of Jersey Boulevard. The proposed elevation consi3ts of tilt-up concrete buildings, painted with horizontal reveal pattern, recessed windows and entrys and office entrance treatment with plazas. { B. Rail Service, The' proposed site is designated for rail service accor ing o Industrial Specific Plan as shown in Exhib t °A ". It shows that an existing rail line to the south should be extended northwards through the project, cross the future Jersey Boulevard and to the northerly properties. The applicant has requested that this rail service requirement be waived. The reason being that the extension of the rail line would require extensive off -site reconstruction of the existing southerly tracks due to the grade differential and the maximum approach ,lope standards set by the railroad company. This issue was forwarded to the Planning Commission for the consideration on May 11, 1988 regular meeting. The Planning Ll PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT JEVIEW 87 -56 DAVIS June 22, 1988 Page 3 Commission reviewed the Staff Report, the written cLAwnts received from Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad Company which verified the physical constraints, and received public input. the Planning Commission determined there was sufficient evidence t a the extension of e rail line cannot be dCCOMplished due to physical constraints on project site an sites to the northand soutr, and waived this,requirement. C. Desi -gn Review Committee. The Coanittee (McNeil, Tolstoy and a eman ) _ on reoreary 18, 1988 initially reviewed the project and recommended that it be revised to address the concerns of providing plaza areas, upgraa;ng the overall architecture for the buildings a:,d providing variation to the building footprint. On April 21, 1988, the Committee (McNeil, Tolstoy and Coleman) reviewed the revised elevation and site plan and made the following r<;comendations: 1. Building entrys should receive additional treatment through provision of free - standing or semi- free - standing boise solid structures and stronger entry recesses. 2. Pedestrian furniture (tables, benches) shdvi'd be provided within the plaza area of Building 6 similar to that used within other plazas. Convenient access should be provided from buildings to all plaza areas. On May 19, 1988 the Committee (Biakesley, Coleman) reviewed the office entry treatment and recommended a perspective view of the office entry with landscaping be provided for full Planning Commission ccasideration. Color perspective will be available at the meeting for the Commission review. The Committee recomnended pproval subject to full Commission review of the office en' ,/ design. D. Tree Re-.oval permit 88 -36. The applicant is requesting to remove che 3 Euc a yp us tfaes, the 3 Walnut trees and the 12 Olive trees. The Walnut trees and the Eucalyptus trees are within the eastern portion of the site while the 12 Olive trees are along the future Rochester Avenue right -of -way. An arborist report has been submitted to the City for review. The arborist report recommended that the 3 Euca',Jptus trees and the 3 Walnut trees should be removed, The 12 Ulive trees could be preserved by relocation. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the tree removal permit for removing the 3 Eucalyptus trees and 'Walnut trees and require the Olive trees to be preserved by relocation. 3 PLANNING, COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ^ DEVELOPb{EHT REVIEW 87 -56 - DAVIS June 22, 1988 Page 4 E. Environmental Assessment ' ',Staff has completed Part II of the Environotenfal klist and found that no significant adverse environme;i,ral impact will occur as a result of this project. If the Manning Commission concurs, issuance: of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. i III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the General an, a -o lec ves'of the industrial Specific Plan and the purpose of the Distaict in- -which the site is located. The proposed use in the site plan together with the conditigns applicable thereto will not be detrimental to the public health, xafetjr or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vacinity. The proposed use and site plan together with the recommended conditions of approval are in compliance with ea0, of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and lndustri,�l Specific Plan. IV. RECOMM1ENDAT1111a: Staff recommends that the 'Planning Commission approve tf.`velopment Review 87-57 and issue a Negative Declaration. 1 ted + ARest BB:NF :mig Attachments: Exhibit "A" m Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "C" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Grading Plan Exhibit =E- - Landscape Plan Exhibit "F" - Elevations Exhibit "G %- Office Entries Desigr Resolution of Approval with Standard Conditions E I%I`" OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA _PLANNING DIVISION �M ITEM' s1. R-i • 4 n 1...l 4" .t,Ail PROP43[p PRIZJEOf +fy� J 101411• ai►tt tallit11M. at. apf►aT i . i C .j Ui 11 81.6.9119 law9. Na7r wtftlaW. rs. aM�tt . 1a.w.w l.wr. •� 1.011. "A l nnllaiYtlowlan VACANT taRYt. ►t►11 tttglNL. me. ,6RCi f "acts. Y R1a. 41 N{t•QC 71441 on 1t✓R UT 1111 ALL j _ {. is tYtititt• tiatsi. uaus wtna►_— 1 � CITY RANCHO F °�6 t�� O CU's AMOK a.T k PLANNING DIVISION E , j vu:iu TAIyT :Mme tin RAI NalttaYi 11111 IYt. LM. 1111146.// �Ntwvit :Yinalactl=aa►L IvfsitttL tat 191 RL R. L it MKS, snv+� t,�lYw v9wf tftlKt. tlN x t8Nlt It rat•u F"� �aaNt .."m — clft.t ,., ant w usslw �w tot 44 RM at 146.91 . . low, tW a1 LIT at RYL 0 G°tr. 'SCALCtIwtlCe• Em IIT +�tlT.`ICt�da M- Wit! to t�� sceesT ease +,sites atiti11% 1R T6a Cltt tt samen eflAwa , STATF aT CMAIMMI. %r PROP43[p PRIZJEOf +fy� J VAT at Yee. 6 /f6 , fiR'•� law9. Na7r wtftlaW. rs. aM�tt . 1a.w.w l.wr. •� 1.011. "A l nnllaiYtlowlan 1'71111 P d N, /l•�t I f "acts. Y R1a. 41 N{t•QC 71441 on 1t✓R tMRS, 111 V, a mf un. ow avir, !B 41011491. _ • unitat .►attefu.:wn 9;a PARPAR.', ItiIP.It X471 at.at L L CITY RANCHO F °�6 t�� O CU's AMOK a.T k PLANNING DIVISION E , j vu:iu TAIyT :Mme tin RAI NalttaYi 11111 IYt. LM. 1111146.// �Ntwvit :Yinalactl=aa►L IvfsitttL tat 191 RL R. L it MKS, snv+� t,�lYw v9wf tftlKt. tlN x t8Nlt It rat•u F"� �aaNt .."m — clft.t ,., ant w usslw �w tot 44 RM at 146.91 . . low, tW a1 LIT at RYL 0 G°tr. 'SCALCtIwtlCe• Em IIT +�tlT.`ICt�da M- Wit! to t�� sceesT ease +,sites atiti11% 1R T6a Cltt tt samen eflAwa , STATF aT CMAIMMI. s' �i fi o: r e W yg ` V u. r L y� w � d g cs • a IL Q 1+ w ly �EEe 1.3� 414111 iE a�� r 9 •�� w o W g all I 1 off', 0 s A c w e W yg ` V u. r L y� w � d g cs '� OY IL Q 1+ O ly a W ,r w x a W g I 1 ti f i L �i 1 �-,T i ►fiiH�" l j s °3 �s aB a.$ . a Rte: ��9 1 poi 6e z 112' ii IiC 5 tl I A 4 9 i y - �— m c_ -.. W 'n a f .O ! j !� I1S fill: cc uj r Q jjryr Y r" 1: ..Ilr Irtif r W C v $ 3 y a� o � y Q i a p{ J IT 4 w I w U i.. w y y i 01 i IIu ■m IN M E ; lilt__ Original Poov Qualm yy w � o I I 9m. '► � 1� ay 3 y z AU fill r o oil sit X11 V g H R W 7 yy w � o I I 9m. '► � 1� ay 3 y z AU �y `V� n a W 4 s a o � 0 X11 cc W s 2 W U W' U 4 U, V g H R W 7 CC cc t �b � 4 t4 tr t qc tu RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 87 -56 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THREE WAREHOUSE BUILDINGS, TOTALINE 177,030 SQUARE FEET vH 1,8 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF JERSEY BOULEVARD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE It; THE MINIMUM IMPACT HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT APN 229- 111 -07 A. Recitals. (i) Davis Development has filed an application for the approval of Development. Review No. 87 -56 as described in tht!� title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject DnVTopment Review request is rfiferred to as "the application". (ii) On the 22nd of dune, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said greeting on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby fouiid, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting on June 22, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at sout4 west coiner of Jersey Boulevard and Rochester Avenue with a street frontage if 1215 feet and lot depth of 286 -feet and is presently vacant,. and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is vacant the property to the south is 3 warehouse buildings, the property to the east -s vacant and the Property to the west is vacant, and (c) The proposed site plan, elevations together with the recommended conditions of approval comply with the Industrial Specific Plan and all other applicable regulations. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission Allk during the above - referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: PLANNI %% COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -56 - DAVIS June 22, 1988 Page 2 EN (a) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan and Industrial Specific Plan; and (b) That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Industrial Specific Plan and the purpLvsra of the district In which the site is located; wend (e) That the proposed use is 'In compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan; and (d) That the pniposed use, together with the conditions a,op1 icable tbareto, will be detrimental M tore public health, safety, u, welfare, or nwl;4riaily injurious to propQrties or improvements ,tn the vicinity. 4. been reviewed sand considered in rcomplian and Qualit act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative 1p Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commissior, hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set "forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein 'by this r- of °rence. Planning Division 1. All walls, such as retaining walls, decorative walls, screen walls, and flood walls shall be of decorative material such as split face block masonry or concrete, consistent with the building material. 2. The final dde gn of the floC4- :.411 along Jersey Boulevard and Rochester Avenue shall be sabject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 3. All open fence shall be of wrought iron or other decorative material instead of chain link fence, 4. All drive way entrys shall have texture pavement such as brick pavers, exposed aggregate concrete. a combination of them, or other similar materials as approved by City Planner. S. Pedestrian connection and walkway shall be of texture pavement � such as exposed aggregate, brick pavers, a combination of them, or other materials as approved by the City Pianner. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION A0. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -56 - DAVIS June 22, 1988 Page 3 6. Additional pedestrian ammenites such as seating benches, tables, potted plants shall �e provided within; the plaza area and the patio area. Final design shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permit. 7. All project entrys shall have special landscape treai;vent such as specimen size trees, accent trees a. *A increased number of trees, :shrubs, etc. 8. Hedgerow shall be provided to screen parking spaces along _ =;ersey Boulevard, Rochester Avenue and the proposed new street along the western boundary. 9. Landscaping shall be provided along the 5 foot setback area of the south property boundary. 10. The removal of the 3 mature Eucalyptus trees and the 3 mature Walnut trees shall be replaced with the largest nursery grown trees available on a one for one basis, as determined by the City Planner. 11. The existing Olive trees shall be preserved by rielocating to the permament location within the site to be indicated 'on the landscape plans. A 1p relocation tree plan, that shows the permament location for the 'Olive trees, the method of protecting the trees during construction phase, shall be submitted to the City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of any permits. Engineering Divis)on. 1. A written agreement or easement for shared use of the existing driveway on Rochester Avenue shall be obtained from a property owner to the south issuance of h,,Iidin3 permit. 2. Off-site construction easement shall be obtained from properties to the north, west, and south where needed prior to the issuance of the building permit. 3. A good faith effort shall be made to obv_ %in an additional 7 feev of street dedication for the half width street along the west site boundary for the full length of the proposed cul -de -sac (586 feet from a property owner to the west prior to the issuance of the building permit). 4. Construction of the portion of the half width street along the west site boundary south of this site shall be coordinated with the property owner to the south. 5. Extend storm drain in the proposed cul -de -sac to the intersection with Jersey Boulevard. Install inlet structures as determined by the final drainage study. Vvr�b. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION No. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -56 - DAVIS June 22, 1988 Page 4 6. The existing overhead utilities (telecomauniCations) on the project site of Rochester Avenue shall be undergrc►unded from the first pole on the north side of Jersey Boulevard to the first pole off -site south of the project south boundary, prior to public improve!pent acceptance or occupancy, which ever occurs first. In addition, an in lieu fee as contributkon 'to the future undergroundin2' of the utilities on the opposite side of Rochester Avenue shall be -paid to the City prior to iSSU#nce of the building permit. The fee shall be one half the difference between the undergounding cost of the utilities (electrical) on the opposite side of the street minus those (telecommunications -, on the project site times the length the center of Jersey Boulevard to the south project boundary, 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22NO DAY OF JUNE, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: ra u er„ epa y Secretary- I. Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rl,ncho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at ragular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of June, 1988,,by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES:. COMMISMNERS: - ABSENT: CO- 4ISSIONERS: F-j x W E Ya a ° °4r 1`Ey N�Yr ° nom• °� °L Wd��a ^tC �. 4 ,y 4LY '�Y zei -is- � $ `.• +O c Q=s SS THE ►iV y n NO © g az "t d- S g N 6 N p 2 ■ i° L. St. $= »MNO Y. ` r «"+ a�"gia �53�3k 3 Is 'mow °a s Q i111 t da. • YCw � � °ter T� ..�° 3g �" . + 8m i3r C Y7_ y + � ggy SAN V , yy ° a;o �• ,V ;3 ESP -„ XHMMM w 6 �TL S y yY� q N T ~4� N:� g � =d C$ L y N 7 w a s� a 9 Y y� kf N N y C y �pk z Y 2` Y $�6 » �4 NJ Y_Y^ 'F , N iaL} M ° 6 12i: d 's 4;0.Y s�i Us W--1q lz -. IgY «y i RJR ��M CMC O cyc N Y Y ya� aS� gi °yyppppp u �� 0.i��< W •a�Nfi tl • 4 �� Y fl, 1. i O YN YiD °�afN C!} — Q� G L 6. Oyy CC4uty I.,� A40L w M I � N A 0 iC u a [ fir, Qmgmtf Oi. idA T� » C C L 444 a,L'6'i1a - jig Is..Z- a— Vex a� «,; S�� - Of.wl ^-r 442~. Q [4 `'j. r ^ � 7F.L� "3gg3`T �zzS1'' it! gal Mil MIR DOZ �.�;pocc oucc : L`"y' ,:low p + 't..q� + +LVy eQR +Y6 yi� Nyw Y.Ya�`� ndikav�r� asAli IN 'I N Q N s Us d 5 � p ■ ?9 f _Z I r a Uts Sa u 4 W-ILT N El ,tier. i at 2u aLn � ry�w� y�} Q a L �� ay♦ a��`Y ji a �d Sg -y^L �'Qjw �p�y�.;�N a "t p,Nj C q r� a js M NW~ aL 0^ �V Yw1YY•.G 6N '�f ®M i Sz- ls + S� aC NtlCY"Y N{�� 62.141 �xa8 OLQ� p= Y� tY 0«�i 8NCRS'�pgP�C n1.. H � �1p/ i qC {(}l M SOY O'pG �Op `N A lT+�s y rf Qz; op a � Z e 6~$$�°'+ w� g .{�r`p'�+`U N is Oa4 NLe P. L --- r p }! q Cry Al _ e f. �y' N °� 'p1" s y L. �f c T{a7+y�. a' �y w �. • YYi2N M - gt��V s-y1.I.N Npfet VV -aN�p G V i Y u N L 1; e= O L acme �S 2.v! "�QCQ�c� {rffyf pia t �R« «sN H�^N4N SMO -Ai OO, as I a��{ L ors€ tee y` 01 MzL 1p� iwx 777 �'� iSY p��YN �Waa N QC a^ 2 w x +.y� �rMwa a'r zz%.c vY 9q N N w gQ`L ��Y 1p �r..��m CC M LP Yi M fLre �J�{ ipe0 P <C �riv V aea gCsW L Q g� G ax CN f{i M MM N„ N NW aR N Y LY l i Y 3 Q P w^ Y. yNM Q(JT1 � Y 9 4 `g i �AY C .�y S � a O � 0tl Yma ygF � jy3 ULzz it - ZITts 2 iii tip }Y!� GCxN � .P�� ri♦e�♦ • �# ♦+��$ �r �w Q ski aWi.. I NV II�a4 4 yNy ��' Q yY(♦ yy � � ' C V u d. � C � M N. C � Y L y C.^ � � S WW y' y{ ~' � �y fLiG ■M■� fO. y HIM v r Or L, F ,/ LL N 7 Lt v Y L N Y b■ +r Y N a t 4 rMNO WQ aM MD r <Li �♦� w i L��" W• i ya a' h RiL t a rY"Q. 6b N{�{1�V Ya�4 W4. ®M�MrO.. I OrIgInai Poor Quaitty s •{^w,� V�AA Y�OY �r� ua1 6rG9 t1�Y YV C N C O C O ^ o w ^y w= C C o W E Sit �e13 .LO. VA. � p lCV a cCeH ,C � •p yiC`N�'Y� 'M1R�¢cS °°C C �A 6Y sgg p� $�ao7t p9 w it-i�N P ^'�s is eg V,ywj N C S ^t� // hPfA�^T A �LqC ��jN �`wl b.NsmP 4 e ®• r S�� f ° L �N L . p �/MR1a N � Ntl v ail e 00 t®hy, ° A >x I I -__ 111S ♦VNS w vY WY�j p yOpy �v8�� aY VNM S �u qs a Xb TL Oc N � 'fF. yM ryry N 6 yuw a s his + «^ Cp �C 3Ni �pau Goy �. � CYaPY� Sip h `V M ` s p $$ c e �1 Y ' �c (iy yy set h,04 L �Vp ♦t` �:� yy ZE. el,� E L M Y O.° �. w M L `° o _ -.35 —0 $erg° yy99^�,3' L.a�. ` RI •�, w ,! N :3i u {O� S 4e.. 9 QOP� i. "4 ifj'� (r A��y.6 mvN, " N y Y•,�en a e e °" ^,� per iii. I.la CHI r s04C L%C a�`s Y$ w LS�i LyM es e��}o':.. \ r V ■ti ! 1�w°9' 66! dVNe V $ Lim L — V y e J t L N f1 u x H Y M L y N N ra uY` 7 noq's 2' a�C C Cy�w � 'Sa� .�.•• V V A }Z ' y Ng `a 3■ � Mg'y q.3� t$.p.2 b' Y � A.rPL �� cLY'� wN YO hr 9U. J C 6 Nw. UN 6 Asa$ eggs ^g +� { t VSO g� <ouHIS sit �-n� _MfM Sq °g 7 6 5 CP 1 4tMN.µ J.1 sf r N �v V y a yV� � Ma g ■ z Y r w ria N N C : y,e V L QI L w N� ~ppl W b Q 6 ^.T O w E� Y a_ w Y�) ytl � s A aw W 4 � n� 8 yy��. r OyY LN~M_P pwS�.w N�4tL.q w A Q6 A Y M. 03 V4. kil, USE m �• Y IS ° M y O N O N p 1 r L ■} TtLI ak tt ( +yy� qq V(�.p N L N C w tI M Y 4 C w w V W M L ig q R; � W D pp CC .!{ CJ 6 Y °� � y w p 9L C7�d8 KYOi. SN t u w q Is sy� s M 4 YE L L ,a a !g e Gp Y �gY a a5 yaCM1.- iVq`� �' �it 11{p1 ,W FEd z. �: pM P till- u� ae s, °• fi 5y «�! y,` Qwm ro. po�. E Pam ■ ©ao� 'C Ea aL g «Xq E �r Ea �E LE � A LAY M q N y D qdY� G� 2T G N dG q $b rn 3 �i V .p, fi1p a e ` � a q uM ^map L C Tz LV�w � °E9M ail p6 yP .5 pQf.yW. nW. rm—U _y ;;i r��ei ECC VY GG i Y B tea` C�6 q�`�� r� 41 �'Yg •� e� w e {. Vq VL NM WOM A..VO c~ypc � b O e{� Y S46Yet O Qi4 OC C V q q < V y f LAY M q N y D qdY� G� 2T G N dG q $b rn 3 �i V .p, fi1p a a q uM ^map �r`� Tz LV�w � °E9M ail p6 yP .5 pQf.yW. nW. rm—U _y ;;i r��ei ECC VY GG p tea` C�6 q�`�� Vq WSQQ u J L FEZ s 9 ]y LM A..VO NOlY A.O� <ur =a C N Cd ir1V a 'LN odcrmal Poor Quality a Y u O 4yd� OY° Y y` 'p L •� •�' �iC iGF f `LY Oi 3 Owtl uug Y.O C s CY y N6 & � 6M �� b q V � � � � ~ • a � od a.4 �yyq� u t{t{aa�� a v �• b o u 4a n�pq sr ' �� °N Y� �a• ios yy�4 YrlN, ��I® �C _. `NV A N� �'+•' af�I y • � v L yypC qC� o Vq �y�^ y�Y MY {I'G wf o'g (p"iO�Li cs °° ��pepya ga �� Y9!y S_�- IL o :s . C O VV �� q� Q A. b> C p• �� O Y �4 g w �y� T$LR•'g �p cQL °aye aYiu�ii yon caL. al �i•v: 'r OIEY 6S o'i ^r' Y ^. L �M Y. O Vw Y.. L•.. ^V _ L N QN •�.N 7r KW 3r0. <i O u`i .�rw AN I i O C -,.-a +�Y Ili ,p m : 4•i—; t, Ja � the 4�a''�in9 Ca��ss' °l. June �2. Meyers o �p'CE; airman and Qlanner pC�CU04M��'::� 1, rJye Cb huller'. City a pAannef i ��IVA Zo e t to Z0; 6rad Pssociat ENj �Np m�i� ca��Oa S05,- f ghies de �qOM; Nancy F °n'3+ �SSESSM 3 in ar SAL adding land o o c th ?.', g`l ; ;All RONNSN pmzn o acpes loated RpN eVe 6.5p Z enue• 5U8JCCt' ase g �� tCict S�? Yireyard �d Q i r�,TMs Build l jai ®is east °� feet to of g h Street,... s4uare 0 p�SCWIP�I��' of aAaer�©eGlara ;fin pNp S1�E pPPro�o� Nepa'v din9s� P¢OJEC We uesand: ssuaoce turinp b��il 1• Nctiosv9 Dana Use end 2onfiv ' aid raanua�a 2 Industrial N. u� ' Coundin ant ivde 1 p' tri �n9sb �enera, du5tria� ®• Sur Multi ae�nd�`SS'trial build several Ir` trya` Narut S r�ca nd st al buis��acavt� Several Zvaus V. Jigt'na 2 b�ildivpy East Suba {actuCiv a e'a IWO c Sub West Pl � pesi� nat'ons• ',vdustrial Cal t Sene GEnera al h 9Cade.1• �• t Site ' al iv�us tC�al Noy Se�aee el Lrid�c�tria nt avd Cou9 Soutte Sev eta Zvdu'tr; site isard Weeds' East - Sen the rass West cteCi,•bisS. n,ti-4e 9 p• Sitee �taov covs e9 7 �11CM X i> PLANNING COOMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT RtVIEW 86-13 - MESSENGER June 22, 1988 Page 2 E, Parking Calculatfans: Number of Number of Type " Squared Parking Spaces` Spaces a of Use Foota2e Ratio Requires Provided Warehouse 146,900 1/1000 20 plus 1/2000 10 over 20,000 plus 1 /4000 27 over 40,000 3T II. ANALYSIS: A. Gener-pl The site is part of Phase I development of an appro�reT taster Plan' as shown in Exhibit "8% Both Phase I development and Builiding 13 of Phase II development have been completed. Recently the Planning Commission approved an Auto Service Center to the west of the sits. The approved site plan required a shared driveway along the two property boundaries. Based an this new design, and the new parking requirements for AML warehouse building, the applicant is able to add square footage to, the west sidz of building 12 and still comply with the parking requirements, The proposed site plan modification and the building elevations are essentially the saute design as previously approved, B. Desi_ggn� Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Biakesly a3�leman ) on F5y IV, 19$8 reviewed the proposed project and recommended approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Add glass .paliels to the southwest side of south elevation and the south side of west elevation. (Revised as shown in Exhibit 71 ".) 2. Dense landscaping should be provided along the south elevation and the rower portions of the west elevation. 3. Landscaping should be provided to the slope area located at the adjacent westerly parcel. Landscape maintenance easement should be recorded between the project site and westerly parcel. 4. Trailer parking spaces should be provided per Industrial Specific Plan Code. Revised site plans shall be subject to City Planner for approval. Revise (as shown in "D") Exhibit to incorporate spaces between dock doors, _I PLANNING COMMiI SION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 06_13 - `MESSENGER f June 22, 1988 Page 3 _ C. Environmental Assessment: Staff 'i,as completed part IT of the: adverse e a c ec is and determined that ►;o significant adverse environmental impact would ,occur as z result ;of this C�,tdect. If the Planning Commission concurs with the findirgs then issuance of the Negative Declaration would be appropriate. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the General .us r T Sp1pcific Plan and the purpose of the district in which the site is located, The proposed use and site plan together with the The applicable thereto, would not be detrimental to the 'public health, safety, welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vacii1itY• The proposed use and site plan together with the recommended conditions of approval are compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan and -J tY Standards. IV RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends to the Piac:1ing Commission approve a modifications to 9eveiopment;Review 86413 and issue 'a Negative Declaration. Resp ly su ted, ra Bu City ne BB:NF:mlg Attachments: Exhibit Ilk, - Location Map Exhibit - R - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "C" - Approved Master Plan Exhibit "D" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "E" landscape Plan Exhibit "F" - Elevations Resolution of Approval with Standard Conditions _../ 0 suet 3 a NORTH CITY OF ^' or RANCHO PLANNING DIVISION a' r .,r ip 7 I J177: J _ ---------- - -!VV nw }�! it 1 - / %l.. % .J'J d °.. ✓ .� f NORTH *jTY OF ITEM -. NC O CU A ON A TITLE: �,+�� riTilqvym-t PLANNING DIVISION .-g- 1,5 ��= a T. . SCALE: ` i> t 6 i. 44 • i EM —i ► i a 4 S rsa kM ►Eoa l xis ar i i� e ! ` 0 O ® r t , y '.r. 1 1 r .i I � I 9 a ie rt SSgi s i a� f s� f S rsa kM ►Eoa l xis ar i i� e ! ` 0 O ® r t , y '.r. 1 1 r .i CI .L a O RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION Y-1 Ll wi.Ylnas war M•M .iliriiw ar..' ws aa�N` 'YeplNw +a•r �i° Anwlaiiu rw Olf►IS Rl IM ay.w� OMYIOOIt Af�Y/i. sill. ad/i.sens.i ARROW BUSMSIS PARK Bt3 LOM f8 LVCW cuemwaa t CAVOMA 1 NORTH RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RkCHO CUCAMONGA PLANN14G COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 86 -13 MODIFICATION, THE ADDITION OF 33,700 SQUARE FEET TO BUILDING 12 A PHASE II DEVELOPMENT ON 6.58 ACRES OF );AND LOCATED AT THE NORTH SIDE OF 9TH STREET; EAST OF VINEYARD AVENUE IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT APN 209- 012 -20 A. Recitals. M Messenger Investment Company has riled an application for the approval of Development Review No. 66 -13 Modificatior as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On the of Jane 22, 1968 the Piaining Commissions of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 'iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have "currted. 9. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hersiby found, determined and resnlved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1•. This Ccmmission hereby specifically fends that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are, tree and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence•presented to thi's Comlmission f during the abov)- raferenced meeting on .Tune 22, 1988 including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows; (a) The application applies to property located at 5000 9t`s Street with a street frontage of 375 feet r-nd lot depth %,Nf 778 feet and is presently improved with vacant; and (b) The property to the north an existing Industrial Pav'�, the property to the, _ uth consists of industrial buildings, the property to the east is an indostrial warehouse building ar^' the property to the west is vacant 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 avr� 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the Geieral Plan and Id ti1 S ^if v it us r a pee is ,lan; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86 -13 - MESSENGER June 22, 1988 Page 2 (b) That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Industrial Specific Flan and the purposes of the d'strict in which the site is located; and (c) That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan; and (d1 That the proposed use, togethQr with the conditions applicable -;hereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially 'injurious to properties or improvements in the vficinity. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has seen revievzd ardd considered in compliance with the Califorri�i Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby '.ssues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division- shall app . All pertinent conditions as contained in Resolution No. 36 -110 2. Glass panels shall be added tc the southwest side 4; south elevation and the southside of west elevation. 3. Dense landscaping with increased number of trees, specimen size trees shall be provided along the south elevation and the lower portion of the west eleV -tion. 4. Landscaping shall be provided to the slope area located next to the adjacent westerly parcel. Landscape easement and landscape maintenance easement shall be recorded between the project site and the westerly parcel prior to issuance to )wilding permit. Engineering Division: 1. The storm drain system shall be completed to the satisfaction of tha City Engineer prior to issuance of any building permits for the modified Building No.12 (8u:lding No. 8). 2. The oint use driveway to the Otis Elevator propert1 shall be constructed prior ilo occupancy. 3. All pertinent conditions as contained in Resolution 86 -110 shall apply. f s PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTInN NO. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 8&13,,•"MESSENGER' ., June 22, 1988 Page 3 6„ The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: .. _Larry T. McNiel, Chairman \ ` ATTEST: Brad u I er I Deptyr .,acre ary, I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission o° the City cf Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the fdregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by thY Planning, Commission of the City of Ki..icho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Plakining Commission held on the 22nd day of June, 1988, by the following vote -to -wet: AYES: COMMISSIONERS; NOES: -COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: r. 1, x v ut R .a SAS �i C1 n $ LL! 6 S �.Dw �� + C �� S » O V C N Y• Uf P�� 3w » 0 Ff cQM/� �OVd Ova- �p�yp-p '„ he Yy » ,� ^�� 41Y Wig PH 71 i Ii. s Is EIJI 41 P ;aas�s�g e iaa M � i W T O V^ �V O oP 4 0� 4 C 0 Im Fm �$ j?% ■7j N • O N a �g�PS i+ �' A » V ywy� ®6 Q®®Q fly4Yy Sr7 RO yyM ^y A0 w k }!S s a 21 s: Y s n V N � M ~ C .e a �• T O V^ �V O oP 4 0� 4 C 0 Im Fm psi$ viizY .Lp< Mw ��ap . F {J L yea Lei! wyii p�. p a 41 qg A O YyN -S1 yy 8"t�y its -!It Fit 4R.S= Lk N x_° SU ,.N J. axe QOo' -- fS "3 pa M $�o VN rNY YO Ul y°i F� y 1 C yi NO LO p pUyy. RA HI A 8 Pli cJ Sv- r"0 N.°C W N lb . fY «L�Y�w �� = gyzCCz z ". H al-z <��d I �rii Na Yw � i YNNr I Poor qy �M�Y Mq =6y�p �•�� 9. �ey� yo L iNNtY N" L NO� 3. �9•CY �Y �gY i ^ "Y� LtY r3. a Y. 11::CECE�9.99.9 wNNNNNN 6. A L$. k q w. Ira AlhT «aL� ~ =+psi 8v8+ «�« s. zy8z saQey„�.� $ate \UpCNgg5-1 Z�B «o3 a �wu3 T all" 3.°� �c8LV�5 C Ll �Y6f tl Y aa t s "aA aY o`�� z a as ,..y if ZI d 2N •1wP7 c ppp ��j'j! pV !i•i •N in x .z; 0 0� �C. :N 001 "ill N� "f C � 6 >.�y C a^ p J 7.0 Lw •ai .. Jw OYY ` y�vL —:Z `. cVl t = =w Y�" COf4 M�� MwM � OY�gy 'L M d QQ.0 p�^ _58 N.. .y� ywY{yp 0 C ■. C it p, 6 i L C N i "• C i. w: fE i dwl !!�- 738 �vu Pe 12 1 wNG ANC <4 JV9y qy,. Of ^I 1 i �NiI yC! C N e ~wMy� �ggllL��00 viizY .Lp< Mw ,Cp L L F {J L yea ^O!� � CC. Eli. y4� M Y " a its YN ,$iD Q gar$s� g��° °yyjam "pyLL N ^ 6 iyy� i t &Ni OIL ° QOo' -- fS "3 pa M N N.'s rNY YO Ul y°i F� y 1 C yi NO LO p pUyy. RA HI A N R w W i 1% original Poor QUQMY •..uL a oyy`. ems. g rd� �_ o�oaa•e +•I%.Ni �' HyL .6I' Vy Y. �O •�. �bp �� m9��. o� uo y��€s„�Q C I C L y '' .. A m q T. Ell y`cal r :g yya a� OM G�• ��OI • .a'. «`ia L /MN � 'yM.$y¢¢.a9s0al •. 9 �e OLC :.- gj a`ppN` y YNp Z .F Pi q ':.y } VO • 4 :i �r �+ r Q wsN•N !M� l.ai 3-0- p lSOi oY O.•.Wi ys^• r` ~ f ,�•• nigce �� s � a_^� �� Y'rNm� 6.Y w b yam• y�M.�: p _ ■ �p O qq Z3 o Q jj $3Z a= 5g » X18 pq iiFF _ As N •� •LYE `, gOP �Y c N o LQy YO '• Y �7 v:�M� by• 7 w m� �.� Oyy� C: G- Q� N1p Q7Ybim Y 4L0 N ►~. 6 !tJ !O V ui x s1, �o A 0 S 4 1_8. .��aTo 3° :5 C5S�" �^ a s CYV� �t Ta • Y M TTy1i l� » 9 qa ta •$y V 52131 M Ise fcc3 �gg 6•..f` :6� spg O� �i�•�d lyi _ N 7 ,cs �s�lN UTL g b 'i� M pyy ;aY�' • let seal �t p .I N S +O ' ;ms YL A lit z 6 4•i F•. C. NN y^ 6 NwYa a'4 L 2 `0�tii rlyp. + c. J w Em EA Qe E U Quailty IL'4�WX all M.EE E q alls6.=. y SW °�• Y Y C z a N C n i fff...iii A^ V V .554 . t. Y k cfwp� �rq'ff- zwc flia �I s I a to � y ■G C V e � Y O ga o i oLrYV3 �� eS_w 3 ^r � ; O a op ° O y� � p � �Y w M. Y� i F i$ » g s Uk 6� N � •y O � r., e V ^ N air w ■ Cfi. � Y� o 0 � O _� sip w O} a Ii =. Ny V VW yVYQ N d ' K Y Y Y ew qG CC F• N .. N � i 5� J L■ to � y ■G C V e � Y O ga o i oLrYV3 �� eS_w 3 ^r � ; O a op ° O y� � p � �Y w M. Y� i F i$ » g s Uk a 6 NO -�M C 4N r 3 �w CIS +a tic e a L » O +pY L 3 i• �y e i+ �� Yw aw _C it �GY 1�1I t�j iC /CV �Y OI S +� {RL�[ «a �Ct 4 V Y WeC V ° ,YAM' p,� �g uuuOM r.N 1V yy � CC C m N8`` o� Y C rJ hh w ■2 1VYy L • N N1 O Q N � r., e r 3 �w CIS +a tic e a L » O +pY L 3 i• �y e i+ �� Yw aw _C it �GY 1�1I t�j iC /CV �Y OI S +� {RL�[ «a �Ct 4 V Y WeC V ° ,YAM' p,� �g uuuOM r.N 1V yy � CC C m N8`` o� Y C rJ hh w ■2 1VYy L • N N1 O Q N Q N I N ' eeio g8 €S� NyyaL o p{ ps x ilia v b8° Ifs Mp "� p YTM.p dy � y � tl a °J3gU a w °No oZ; A �a S C M 1L r Y\ aas� yVy^ M�A41'e e.. :lilt of p -5 t pQ ®® et A N � L ■ X11 y 0� ��Nwy L $ p' J ' 0 8 4 A C g ZZ HITL 221 XZ Ho p @OC L 'Y 21 �iCLb�6C MM N cc a tot VIM Y bb Ai - N «gg w�. i y. i�'oL�Toi'".. �saoC4 Isla; SIP. a N yN C �Y �MiIY s. s�� yy� gE 3 ®® aG _ s N Y o 33gyo N�vvqq L1C C6 ix ..�Y y� pQ� Vpe�? yN N.�VY x0 K7C� ��yJ. p gy �p�^' `. qt�w 7 +0. G.6��L VVV p M y V C CC l� WM W.VY 1C4•r Ny 4.me �a vnaa s >aii�u s a u' N Iy C C 1 1 V �•J 2M a r..J soo3 pp¢yy �_� q s C KYS' iq 9CW O p ��r =a O C CN u uy. _ rh Y O M^ y N O r t• Y Y w� Y 4 Y Y$ w y,� �Q Y Y°d r 'ryry"g-.faL h W` +s ii I ass s :tl53 4_ of Lb QLL � Sao xE� fi. gG^ » .1% p pOOI g 6 6M OYI�Aa C.I. VL e_w Z` L r .« wo r Z .NT al`o5$i: »$ tlS $a+ `� ai."L.'x`zv3 Kai s CnY'SuZ <3 i i i i wi i i $ u N � w w �g r ` �L N� N y N L G Q � M Y yI C3 C ° v Min � O i f Sp V Y g g� Ems g� L � n y N�M _Cy M V N nt N J � �ua S� Alm r all 1.8 L a °<ap:�` ciyH ~ypuw � PO C Vw mu-4r `, a. g Q4 � Op+ Y erg ��QQP 6 n.. ap ■o„ •. �vN kV' SS9PF a= G.AV NGW4� `<0.W ' _ Wjf N Cs 4 3Tib w W Se OY yy 6$ CV N 4 p 3' X08 $v' ub L° eu • ..N �g 3E4 s °rO^ a+�N °Y0 0 L eta S'11c $15 W R I 11 AMM esV,� �'., L • all G;L 7 � a• N Pay U y� u . e. • 7 • LVD.+ OI�ON W .$ a t— •V Y.L. N. i Y� 09 E3� � �'� ZNF 9V E.l �1r 1C M 2 KIM 1 ia°j... L •�0 . Re `� C r id -Sit Yi- r T—. om• E « r _ _LY Le N p � _f 1� Y NN • — r a �r L — �s • B crc C V) y ••V�•� ((p M icvY CC wCy��JC GqGJ p�. Y OI —� IJ q` Sya �!: kW a+� K? 6N..•.q N2 O' K6 yy�w J.w. _ -2b 11 J AMM esV,� �'., L • all G;L 7 � a Pay U IU . e. • .$ a t— •V Y.L. N. ° Y� gig ZNF 9V E.l �1r 1C M 2 KIM 1 ia°j... L •�0 — Re `� C r °iY �ppNC Yi- s.•au� 30t� hsNC J 17 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June��', 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: William J. Silvtf; Deputy City Engineer BY: Betty Miller, Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: MINOR DEVELOPMENT REV GW 87 -64 APPEAL - BUTLER - An appeal of a C011di—ti-0—n--of Approval requiring instillation of a pedestrian accessway to Bear Gulch School from the project site, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard last of Vineyard Avenue - APN 208 - 192 -10 I. ABSTRACT: The applicant is requesting that the Planning Commission e3 e—te —the Condition of rYproval requiring that a pedestrian accessway be provided from the south boundary of the project to Bear Gu1cSi School. II. BACKGROUND: The proposed project consists of the construct i-I of a 6nO square foot storage building in the parking lot of Pepperwood Apartments. The project location is shown on Exhibit "A" along with the status of development in the area. The project site plan is shown on Exhibit "B ". The single Condition of Approval was established by staff and presented to the applicant by litter dated Mav,ch 11, 1988 (see Exhibit "C` }. The applicant objected to the condition (Exhibit "D ") but failed to file his appeal until after the appeal period had expired. Therefore, he has submitted an amendment to thc, conditions of approval (see Exhibit "E"). III. ANALYSIS: Staff first requested a pedeecrian accessway to Bear Gulch School n October 1987. Such an access would reJuce the number V-- unnecessary vehicle trips for parents transporting children to school, and would provide a shorter, safer route for those children currently walking along high traffic peripheral streets, specs -71cally Vineyard Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. The recommendation was based on staff's interpretation of the Foothill Specific Plan, assuming that elt.antary school traffic 's an important pedestrian connection. Both tracts adjacent to Bear Gulch School, Tracts 12721 and 12835 on Exhibit ",A", were required to provide pedestrian access to the school. The property owns did not agree with staff's recommendation out of concern that it would negatively `ffect his lirbility insurance. ITEM Y ti: PLANNING COMMISSIO!( STAFF REPORT MDR X17 -64 Appeal =- $ostler June 22, 1988 Page 2 The cond;'tions' of approval were first presented 'o the applicant in November 1987, and were revised to their present warding, after discussions with the applicant in December 1937. They were ff °nalized in the approval letter to the applicant on March 11, 1985 (Exhibit "C -), The requirement to install the physical improvements is subject to acquisition of an access easement from the property owner to the south of this project. Staff is satisfied that tha applicant has made a good faith effort to obtain the easement, without success. Therefore, the Present condition is that the applicant enter into an agreement with the C(ty to provide the necessary improvements at such time as the City is able to obtain the n ^cessary access rights. It is this condltiori that the applicant is recommending be deleted. Iv, RECCMMENDATION: Staff recommends that th, appeal be denied, therefore upnolding t requirment to provide a pedzstrian accessway upon future acquisition of the necessary easements by tlia City. Respectfully submitted, William J. Silva, P.E. Deputy City Engineer WJS :BM:sd Attachments: Project Location (Exhibit "A") Site Plan (Exhibit "B") Conditions of Approval (Exhibit "C) Applicant's Appeal letters (E,hibits "D" and "E ") [A @ -- ----------- =~e~w�---_' ti FX Z. Al c Wu Fummuo Nt � � | � � Qom' � ��ep I � 1 � � I� .`'!�"•a•{� --Y . AP Nr 44 azN.o Z rlw lw ka f1M 4 p aA R CAW w4y I C O RANCHO CUCAMONGA TM&SWE 0;- I'i'i; PLAN a, = CITY OF RANCHO CU'CiaMONGA Post olaox Pox $07, , cutsUmm c s>o„u.4t7sa, 014) 489•1851 Amik March 11, 1988 William booty Skinner. Sauey, 6artsman 11110 Ohio $venue, Suite 200 Los Angeles, Califovnia 90425 SUNECT; MINOR DEVELQP. ., REVIEW 87 -64 Dear Mr, The Dever,_ ._- process for the tbovs•de=ribed project has been succassfuliy mpUts ,. and rpprovai- has bes- granted based upon the 'following findings anu conditions. Thank you fer your participation and cooperation during this review pro,,-.ass. We sincerely hope that thi process has been a positive experis.-,rte for all involved. Thic ded sisa shall be effective following a 10-day apptal period bertinning t1th the data of this letvar. Fiddles A. Trap the project ix consistent with ;, .aeral Plan. a. Yhat the proposed projert is in accordance with the objectives of the Development Cole and the purpose of tie dis:?ict in which the site is located, C. That the proposed pr-, j iect togvther with the conditions applicabva thereto, , -,1 not b,: Jetrixerttal to the public t+ealth, %afeU, or •wtsfam ar cuterially injwrirus to pro"rties or improvements 1, *_-he vicinity, D. ;hat the pra;oxid project aiil comply with each or the applicable provisions av th6 DevelorAent C(sde. Cenditlons ?his project is -)proved sOject tr th =e following coadiVorv, 1. A pe,�esvw "- acreAwaa „,y Shall be provided from the so;4th bounder, to Star Gulch School to tt4 south. ier ,rove nts (gate In the existing force, stepti > necessary for dhe accossway, both in and off z,�, le completed with the �I i rQYNyf•Rf+f:1V'f Deborah `X Bra »c ChmdexD Buquetti hi:rey K,,, ca :od”, t'a=la! Wrio., ia. an Si Wasscrman EXH`CLOT a�V tt William Bouey Minor Develapmnt ncvie 87 -64 Aarch 11, 1988 ,! Pale 2 cOlstruction Of the proposed s1wrage buildikg priar to the #s.uance of building perAlts. However, if the develops- is unable to obtain the necdUary access rights from t1ri pr-bperta! to the sn, uth, aftkir aa{'inj a good faiths effort to do s0 !. the satisfaction of thL. - City Ehgijrtji -, ` the City will allow him to enter into an agr±eeeea to defir the physical improvements ,until such tiue Uat the .necessary access rights can be q'atainee by some atner`.,eans ' Please note that conditions %,ay specify cnplo! «iOn of certain -plans or, .: wort prior to issuance of building per�oits.', If you shoul(.t any quesVons concerning specific conditions, please feel free to corkAct Beverly NisreR at (714) 989 -1861. Sincerely; ` f' COWNITY DUELOPMEWT DEPARTIREMT PLAN IVISI City Pl ner $B:te o cc: 'ia:,k Butler �y I E BUTLER g ASSOCIATES • t -.rch. 21, 1988 Mr. Brad Buller City Planner City of Rancho Cacar,.onga ; y P -0. box 507 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mc. Buller; Me received a py of the attached letter. As you.kmv, we have been working with your department for six months in order to get pezm ssioll to install a 600 square foot storage building. your letter asks us to he?" you solve a problem qn U's 'adjacent' Pror-narty a,s .'condition of your approval, and requires us to spaW considerable money on Improvements relative to this problem. Our storage buil6ing is not related to your need for an easemesit on scoLme else's property. We are active members of the Rancho Cucamonga Com)n mity, hTe maintain OAe of the finest apartment compleXes in tY.e City, we are active ir_the Chanter and me Participate in charity functions. Why are you giving as a hard time when we core ro our City a permission to build a 600 square foot 'storGx e buildirW. sking We told l -)u rran*_hs ago that we contacted the adjacent property Mner and they said in to an e.:swz -41t but to tailed. It is your job, not ours, Plee� contact Mir on-site manage:, Ms. Jan MartYnec, if you have a queation regaxdi-ng our attempt. i believe that we are being t -. ated unf� irly by the City Staff. By copy of this letter, I ask that )vo be placed on the Planning month i old eq City Council Agent for a ;public reviec: of aiir six ironth old request. Sincerely, Zia f gl,ck E. B'ut'ler JEB:dmk ' Enclosure OC: Honorable Dennis L. Stout Mayor, City of Rancho Cucamonga Mr. laueen M Wasserman City Manager Mr. Ja-* Ian CormMity Develorment Director i � ET BUTLER & ASSOC1A.TES :?c CE�ELCa4'Er..� FINANCE . May ;p5, 1988 1 'P TIVED —�- Mr. Brad Bul:,er j CMYOFRANCHOCUCAX46NGA City planner !' 0 ANNING WnStoN City Of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 1 71819110lUi12Q$i210 l+fi6' Dear Mr, Buller: p As you are taeware, we have been ! tru ro attempt to obtain 9 -ing with our a building foot .ytora g pe:m -4' for a 600` square ge building at PePPerwood Apartme.atz, have discussed the *atter and , rte give qs a COyy of your file relating to enough to Development Review 87 -64-1, 9 Minor i Our initial application was filed September 25, 1987 and your response is contained in a latter to our Architect dated March 11, 1988. Wa wrote to you on March 21, 1988 objecting to the conditions of ajproval, Time ran out QP and you asked that we file a new application. Our new application is dated May 2, 1988. Or May 11, 1:388 your aevGrly Nissen advisgd us that we needed to write to you indicating that we aon,t with your previous Conditions. agree Please consider this letter and our letter to you dated March 21, 1988 as our letter objecting to said conditions. Please advise us regarding the next step in the process. Sincerely, Jack E. Butler ?EB ;dnk Enclosure cc: Mr. Jack Lam I j t ' •• y � � _ _ ..�� k iFORNIA � 90404 T ELEPHONE,2+3e207.7332 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REI J T June 22, 1988 Chairman and 14embers of the Planning Cosoourr:ission Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner Nancy Fong, Associate Planner WEST VALLEY DETENTION FACILITY - COUNTY REVILW 8843 Courtesy rev ew o X486,000 square foot oetention facility pronnsed by San. Bernardino County at the northwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Fouilh Street - APN: 229-283 -51 and 62.. I. ABSTRACT: This report, outlines the County detention facility propasaT. The Urmission is requested to review the project and the attached staff comtents. With the Commission's concurrence, these comments wi'.l be forwarded to the County as the City's recommendations to be considered in the final design of the facility, Ii. BACKGROUND: The proposed West Valley Detention Facility is to be con— s— rid by the bounty of San - Bernardino on a portion of a 120 acre site located in the southeast corner of the City. Because of the nature of the project, the City has no fGmal jurisdiction over the desl!gn of the facility. coweaer, we have an agreement with the County calling for a courtesy review by . the City. Planning ftnn.iss on similar to the City review of the Cocinty Law and Jus.tics Center. The intent �,f this review is to assure than ;he facility is consistent with the general design criteria of the Industrial Specific plan and is successfully integrated into the surrounding industrial area. III. ANALYSIS: A. Site Characteristics and Surrounding Areas: The site is v4cant and vegetation consist:; mo"stiy: o un,a ended vineyards. The site contains over 220 acres as shorn in Exhibit "B ". A l detention basin exists in the southwest corner of the site. The corner of 4th Street and Etiwanda Avenue is designated as a secondary gateway to the City. Approximately the southern 2/3 of the site is within the General Industrial District while the remainder area is in the heavy Industrial District. North of the s tz are vineyards, avid two existing singtt fatal "iy homes with barns and other winery br,'Idings. A large warehouse - ITUI Z E. f PLANNING COMMISSIGN DIRECTOR'S REPORT WEST VALLEY DETENTION VACILITY COUNTY REVIEW 88-03 June 22, 1:968 Page 2 building is 10cate4 northeast of the site. To the eajt- is the unincorporated County area and the City of Fontana, ?Ad to the south is the City of Ontario. To the HFat is tke Southern California Edison easeilent and Pic-N -Save distribu,4(on enter. B. Protect Descri Lion. The facility is intended to',irfeet the near term a es an capacity acquirements for the West Valley region of the Cop.aty.. Its planned total capacity ft 1;.106 beds, of which 960 will be ,within cells, and JJ4 wit),j n the infirmary and other arias. In addition to inmate housing, the facility will contain administrative and support areas for a totae of 486,000 square feet of floor area. The facility will employ a total of up to 374 persons in three shifts, with day shift employment of 170 persons. The proposed site plan has at) interior loop road that is set back away from: the streets. The administration and other service related buildings tagether with staff and. visitor parking are oeierte6, towards Etiwanda Avenue, The housing clusters are - onr$cted b; long enclosed corridors. The service yard and utility buildings are oriented toward the west.. The proposed eTevatiors are of post - modern ' >t�r1d.' The administration buildings have sufficient r.rticulativn, in surfaces and rnof lines. The materials proposed for the administration building consists of lime stone veneer with a color split -face block layer at the base to break up the massing. C -ther materials used are glass block, ceramic tile an? metal roofing. The design of the octagonal housing blocks is very Institutional in character, with narrow windows dictated by security considerations. The materials used fcr all other related service buildings and the housin7 blocks consist of mainly split -face block. C. Cam atP ibitit� of the Pro osed Facility with the City's YSuat.trla�i�pe an.� �e rl{ 'ale jie'- design of t4�3 yi —sgou provide for compatibili>,f in appearance with the newly developing character of the area and should reflect the community's values and standards established in the City. In reviewing the proposed site plan and elevations, staff" has compiled a list of t ",hnicai and design comments that will serve as a set of general design standard:; and criteria for the design of the facility. These comments concentrate on public improvements and landscaping and screening of the facility. ?hose comments are attached for your review (see Fxhibit "I',). "71 PLANNING COWItSION DIRECTOR'S REPORT WEST VALLEY DETENTION FACILITY - COUM REVIEW 88 -03 June 22, 3988 Page 3 IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff re= mends that the P%vinirg Commission rev w the attached comments and provida staff with approp -iat -, direction faf response to the County. Respectf,t' su,itted, Otto I uuloti'il F Deputy City Plannew OK :NF:te Attachments: Exhibit "A" LocatiiIn Map Exhibit "B" IndustPial Specific Plan Map Exhibit "C" - .Detailed - -Site :Plan Exhibit "D" - Conceptual i`.adscape Plan C Exhibit "E" Natural Features Map Exhibit "f" Zlevations Exhibit "G" - Su iding Sections Exhibit '�N" - Floor Plan Exhibit �I" - Draft Comments C ---------- SCALE: t°e290a' PROJECT SITE EtaVIR jNWMSIVfAL IMPAG REPORT •a.e w 4th Street and Ettwaeda Avenue 87-41- 263 -01 San Der erdino, Caltrowla _ Caner rse Envirenmer`.t;al Cansultants Callfarnia ,1 -2 1 OF RANCHO CUNA PLANNING DIVISION L 11 4•ORiA v TITLE:-, EXHIBIT: . SCALE: FiCa. IV-17 IS SMCUCATI -- _ E411111110 120* 11.0— 100' R.O.W. SS' or Nu A J.W. RAtC SERVicE •►***+ Exi tip ...a.. Proposed TRAILS /ROUTES 0000 pedestrian • • • s Bkyete �7 How Uiw°teY Faisment Peeks x cAannete Bridge Accese Points 'Park Pte Station 0 S00' L No 4,; Parcet W40 a.16 lot conn0eretbor 'TTia saes a a" MAY not be cuft" tgnut W y s �salbn Meek, a x x tsaeacon Of • . roActed true nso ttut R a71 g0 adw sd * p� k- T eaY for a oft SPITY OF T .q A D O �/ V 4.11M O SJe PLANNING DIVISION V w' FORTHg am a II ll E i . 12 E 4.,ITY OF MANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION r r V= PLAN CITY OF RAID ;C HO C UCAMO GA J /,?l 4NI G DIVISION a0^�..11l NORTH (SITY OF, RANCHO CUChMoN.GA PLANNING DIV,1810N 4:: NORTH TITLE: Ala,/ EXHIBIT. -E . KAU: r I EEr (SITY OF, RANCHO CUChMoN.GA PLANNING DIV,1810N 4:: NORTH TITLE: Ala,/ EXHIBIT. -E . KAU: r I (SITY OF, RANCHO CUChMoN.GA PLANNING DIV,1810N 4:: NORTH TITLE: Ala,/ EXHIBIT. -E . KAU: 0701. -Q � -22 -88 PC Agenda 6 of 6 o _o. -:4 � § `\ . %k\ \�� : A \� F-21 KI I - jp� L WJ c� II III 4 a a Y u �m CITY OF ITEM ALM& RANCHO ' A r. TMEO PLANNING DIVISION a lu i u V% e CITY OF RANCHO 4 PLANNING DIVISION / 3 i ti E Ef - RITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: SCALE: NI fig "e1 NORTH, E DRAFT COMMENTS ON THE WEST VALLEY 9FTENTION CENTER COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO I. PUBLIC INM►ROVEMENTS NEEDED TO SUPPORT DEVELOPMENT: Deveionment of the County's West Valley Detention Facility at the northwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 4th Street should include the conc*- action of public improvements in Etiwanda Avenue and in 4th Street consistent with the discussions which took place during April, 1987. During these preliminary discussio: +s, the p?jblic improvements needed to support this development included construction of street improvements, traffic signals, undergrounding of utilities and drainage facilities. During the preliminary discussions, it was anticipated that approximately 40 acres of land would be developed with a frontage on Etiwanda Avenue. A preliminary estimate of cost of public improvements to support such a development was prepared on April 30, 1987. Effective development of this County facility should provide all public improvements which would normally be required for any development and use of the property. The development plans being prepared for this site reflect a facility which will use both the Etiwanda Avenue and 4th Street frontages for access rather an only a development which tmould have frontage on Etiwanda Avenue. Therefore, the improvements listed, in the following paragraphs should be constructed to accommodate this development. o. ETIWANDA AVENUE should be constructed to its -full width pavement reconstruction) including curb and gutter on both sides. Right -of -way acquiLition would be needed to provide a total of 50 feet on the east side of the street. Street construction would include all necessary traffic signing, striping and pavement markings. The existing traffic signal at the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and 4th Street should be modified and upgraded to accommodate the increased traffic generated from this development. The intersection improvements would include reconstruction to its ultimate configuration including pavement transitions for turning lanes and an adequate radius for curb returns at the corners. Street lighting should be rrovided along the west side, of Etiwanda Avenue for the total property frontage. The driveway onto Etiwanda Avenue should be 50 feet wide consisting of two drive aisles of 20 feet separated by a median of 10 feet as measured at the right -of -way line. A southbound deceleration lane should be provided north of the Etiwanda Avenue driveway. DRAFT COMMEN'S ON WEST VALLEY DETENTION CENTER Page 2 Although sidewalks may not be needed along Etiwanda Avenue until Further development of the property, parkway improvemenis, including street trees and other landscaping should be provided for approximately 100 feet north and south of the driveway entrance. o. FOUR',rt STRKT improvements should include pavement repair an or over ay as determined by field inspection for the entire frontage of the property. The driveway on. 4th Street should be minimum, of 35 feet wide with a westbound deceleration lane provided at the east side of the driveway. Sidewalks may not be necessary along the 4th Street frontage at this time; however, sufficient right -of -way for an easement at the corner of 4th Street and Ftf;anda Avenue should be provided for a City entry monument to be constructed with the Cit >`s beautification program. All existing overhead utilities (communication and electric) ot, . the north side of 4th Street should be undergrottnded from the first pole west of the w`st property line to thti_ —first pole on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue. existing overhead utilities located approximately midway between the north and south property lines should be undergrounded or removed with this development. Although sidewalks may not be needed along the north side of 4th Street until further develoixnent of tha property, full parkway improvements similar to those on Etiwanda Avenue should be provided on both sides of the driveway entrance. The drainage facility on 4th Street should be provided With as much parkway sI Bening as possible along the north side of 4th Street. o. DRAINAO.. IMPROVEMENTS for this site should include development of e existing 5asin to accommodate the increased flows as approved by the City Engineer. An underground storm drain pipe is needed along the westerly property line extending from the existing retention basin to the existing system to the north that drains 8th Street. Drainage studies should be submitted to the City for review of adequate flood protection and impact on i�djacent areas. Portions of the property adjacent to Etiwanda Avenue are located in a Flood Zone "A*. therefore, any development in that area will require flood protection measures. DRAFT COMMENTS ON ;TEST VALLEY DETFNTION CENTER Page 3 a_ o. CONSTRUCTION PLANS cam: public improvements needed to accomOo a e this development should be prepared consistent with the Ci,;;* of Rancho Cucamonga Standards. The Ciity's Engineering Developirent Management staff will provide assistance in reviewing and coordinating development of the public improvement plans. Prior to the beginning of construction within the street right -of -way, encroachment permits will be issued by the City's Public Works Inspection staff. During construction, all City streets must remain open to traffic at all times with adequate traffic safety !ontrol to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. II. LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING. The landscape plans submitted provide only very concepv.:.;J information. It is requested that the City be given an opportunity to review the final landscape plans when they become available. The following City Standards should be incorporated in the landscape eesign: o Staff parking and visitor parking areas should be landscaped per City Standards at a Fate of one tree per 3 parking stalls. o The entire length of the driveway off 4th Street should have a minimum of 10 to 15 feet of landscaping on both sides. As for the main entrance drive off Etiwanda, it should have a minimum of 20 feet of landscaping on both sides. The median island should also be landscaped. o The open area south of staff parking should also be landscaped. o Dense landscaping should be provided along the interior perimeter loop road from tiie point of the utility building to the and of visito" parking, with the intention of providing adequate screening. o Historically, Eucalyptus windrows have been used in the Etiwanda area for wind protection. The use of Eucalyptus maculata, planted in a windrow pattern at 8 feet on center, is required in new City projects for replacement plantings. It is suggested that Eucalyptus maculata windrows be considered for use along the interior boundaries of the site, and in conjunction with other materials to assure adequate screening, also along the perimeter loop. o All trees should be a minimum of 15 gallon size. Excepting fis windrows, twenty percent (20%) of all the trees should be of box size (24" box) All shrubs should be of 5 gallon size. Groundcover should be planted at 10" an center. AW DRAFT COMENTS ON WEST VALLEY DETENTION CENTER Page 4 o Citt designated street tree for 4th Street is P'latanus Acerifolia (London Plans) anO street trees for Etiwanda Avenue are Platanus Acerifolia and Pinus Elderica Nondell'Pine). o The site is within San Bernardino County Dust _Control District. If there are plans to grade the--area around the facility, the entire area around t4eJacility should be treated for erosion and aesthetic control. o The area for the three future housing blocks should have sa;ae landscaping for erosion control. _. o Wherever possible, security and other fencing should bed of wrought iron or other material comp.'�ble with the high quality character of the industrial area.- Tree use of chain link and barbed wire is strongly discouraged. Where such fencing must be used for security considerations, appropriate locational, grading and landscaping techniques should be used to screen such areas from view. III. OTHER CONSIDEUTIORS: All roof - mounted mechanical and other equipment should be architenturally integrated into the structures and totally screened from view on all sides. Signs should be consistent with %he City Sign Ordinance. Mnument signs are limited to 24 square feet in area and a height not to exceed G feet from finished grade of the curb, one monument sign per street frontage.. Wall signs should not exceed 20 square feet and should be placed below the roof 1inP. Oi`cctory signs should not exceed 15 square fee' aid,uot be higher., th�€t 4 feet. City regulations limit the height of outdoor and parking area light fixtures to 25 feet. Except where necessary for security considerations, outdoor lighting should not exceed the Ci 4l s height limitations. A parcel map should be considered to sepapate the detention facility from the remainder of the site and to delineate future developable areas. Every rffort should be mads to assure successful integration of the project into the surrounding area.