The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1988/07/13 - Agenda Packet0701-02 o 7-13-88 PC Agenda o 1-of 6 r_ �o C�..40�i, i Qa�. CITY (Y RANCHO CUCAIMPW, Q .PUNNNING COIN1VIISSION U � AGES U 1977 WEDNESDAY July 13, 1988 11s00 p.m. LIONS PARK 60MMi7NITX CENTER 9161 BASH LINE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOE'NIA L Pledge of Allegiance IL. Roll Call Commissioner Biakesley Commissioner Emer-ick Commissione7 Chitiea _ Commissioner McNiel ' Commissioner Tolstoy HL Annotmcements i IV Approval cf Minutes June 22,198£3 V Consent Calendar na a following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and nor.- controverstal. ney will be acted on by the Commission at one time withe -ut discussion. If anyone has concern over any .item, it anould tom` removed for discussion. A. DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 13304 -LEWIS HOMES - Design review of site plan and building architecture for ' ;aact 13304, an approved residential subdivision of 9.27 acres within the Terra Vista Planned Community into 59 lots, located at the northwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain View Drive - APN: 227- 151 -13. B. DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 137h8 FROCK 'be .design review of building elevations and N- tailed site pl+nt for a previously approved tentative tract mail consisting of 102 single family lots on approximately}; 28.57 aerts of land in the Low- Medium Residential District F9 -8 dwelling units per acre), located north of Highland Avenue, west of Milliken Avenue, south of Banyan, and east of the icXw.,Creek Channel - c PN: 201- 271 -55. 1 .e� q VL Public Heari n€ The following .tems are public hearings in which concerned individuals May Voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. .ail such Opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual ;,•.r each project. C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 8902B - FIRST CITY PROPERTIES CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1 A request to amend the Circulation Element of the General Plan to widen Cherry Avenue from the intersection of 24th Street (existing Summit Avenue) to interstate 15 from a ce7lect9r, to a secondary arterial with a 111; foot right- of-way and to 1.'Jden 24th Street, east- of-the loops (existing Summit Avenue) in the vicinity of Cherry Avenue to a 114 foot nett -of -way. (2) Amend the Master Ulan of Trails of the General. Plan to relocate the trail on fie south side of 24th Street, east -of the -loon, fexisting Summit Avenue) to the north side of 24th Street, i;:_ai -of- the -locp, along the northerly City boundary and to delete a porno ; thereof, (Continued from .Tune 22, 1988) D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND EI'IWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 88 -Oi -FIRST CITY PROPERTIES /CITY OF RANUH -0 CUCAMONGA - 1 A request to amend the Etiwanda IVeci£ic Plan to. widen Cherry Avenue from the nterseetion�iof 24th Street (existing Summit Avenue) to Interstate 15 from% -collector tc , secondary arterial with & 110 foot right- of-way and to widen 24th Street east-of-the-loop (existing Summit Avenue) b the vicinity of the intersection with' Cherry Avenue, to a 110 f;sot right -of -way. (2) ,Amend the Master Plan of TPaiIs to relocate the trail on the south side of 24th Street, east -of -the- loop, (existing Summit Avenue) to the north side of 24th Street, east-of-the-loop, along the northerly City boundary and to delete a portion thereof. (!Continued from June 22, 1988) �. E. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 87 -01: - HARRY C'S - A consideration ` to modify, suspend or revoke an entertainment permit granted for a disc jockey doing vocals, act, play, show, dance contest, 'band, beauty contest in conjunction With a restaurant /nightelub,located at 108:7 Foothill Boulevard. F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT "'43 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - ` A request to amend 5718 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan pertaining to Communize , -ails. t - VM Old Businim N. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 15 - DESIGN COOPERATIVE The development of -a1,700 square foot restaurant on .38 acres of land within, the Office Professional District, located at the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue - APN: 208- 811 -58. (Continued from June 22 1988) O. VARUANCE "77-03 - DESIGN €n,0PERsT- ..1VE, -_A request to allow a reduction in the reuii�a street side building setbacks and the average landscape setback foci a 1,700 square foot restaurant on • .38 acres of land within the Office Professional District, located at the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue - APX: 208411 -58. (Continued from June 22, 1988) f P. ENVERONMENTAL ASSES M_ OT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW . 87-56 DAVIS DEVELOPMEN - The development of three 3 warehouse buildings totaling lr,s030, square feet on 7.8 acres of land in the Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial District, Subarea 9, located at the southwest corner of Jersey Boulevard and Rochester Avenue - APN: 229- 111 -07. Associated with this project is a Tree Removal , ermt 88 -36, for the removal of three Blue Gum Eucalyptus trees and three English Walnut trees. (Continued from June 22,198$) vim New alsinesa � Q. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -57 = VIOLFE /LANG CHRW70PHER - The development of a retail building for a bieyele store totaling 3,060 square foot on 0.37 acres of land in the General Commercial District locatee at 7810 Haven Avenue - APN: 1077- 401 -37. R. Mt-NOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -S4 APPEAL - BUTLER - An appeal of a Condition of Approval requiring installation of a pedestrian accessway to Bear Gulch School from the project site, located on the soudi side of Foothill Boulevard east of Vineyard Avenue - APN: 208-192-10. N. Dhvetor4 Reports S. VIRGINIA DARE CENTER ?ARKING STUDY ' - T. ' DETUTWINATION OF TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER AS A °REGIONAL CENT-BRIT FOR THE PURPOSE OF PREPARING A UNIF� 0RM IGN PROGRAM ,J f C ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANT) INDUSTRILL SPECIFIC- PLAN AMENDMK. T 88 =01• SUBAREAS -2 AND 3 --CITY OF R_ANCIIO CJCAMONGA - An amendment to the industrial Specifie Plan, ex iii d&n the boundaries of Subarea 3 (General Industrial) to include portions of the area on tho south iide of t3r.0w Rot Vie, between Heliman,and Vineyard, currently located in St,barea Z'(General Industrial). Modification of permitted and conditional'-: permitted rises may also be considered. H ENVIRONMENTAI ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMEBiT 88 -06 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA --An amendment to Title 17, Chapter 17.08, of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code establish ng minimum required sizes for multi- family dwellings; �j . ENVU ONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERF41 88 26 - EMPIRE HAIR DESIGN -'lj le request to establish a beauty parlor in a leaseed space of 1,691i square feet within an existing indL ;axal park in the General Tadu.. rial District (S ubarea 4),, located at the southeast corner of rehibald Avenue and Seventh Street - APN. 209 - 212 -48, J. ENVIRONMENTA% ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL U;PE PERMIT 88 -27 - pERRY C1i31t0PRACTIC' ey w-c': - The request to establish a chiropractic clinic in a leased space of 1,326 scr are feet within an existing hdutrial[ park in the General Industrial District (Subarea 4) located at 9126 Archbald Avenue, Unit A - APN.. 209-211-48. K, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSRK 114T AND CONDMONAL USE PERMIT 8P-20 MOBIL OIL The development of a self- service gasoline station consisting of a 1,024 square foot retail building and three pump islands covered by a 2,719 square foot canopy on 0.73 acres oll land in the General Industrial District, Subarea 1, located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Vineyard; Avenue - APN: 207 - 262-48. L. TdNYIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERhUT 88 -29 - IVERSEN - The request to expand an existing offie;T 'n a leased space of 3,120 square feet within an existing industrial Park In the General Industrial ]District (Subarea 11), located at the northeast .corner of Utica Avenue and Sixth Street - APNc 209. 411 -17. 1 M. ENVVURONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE 'EIiMIT 88-25 - U.S. E UI`1ZES -The request to establish an office in a leased spies of 1,904 square feet within an existing industrial park in the General Industrir l Distriut (Subarea 11), - located at the northeast corner of Uiica Avenue and Sixth Street - > ia� 200-111 -17. s. eommissson BMdness U. REV,OW TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS V. DEar REVIEW COMMITTEE APP0114TMENTS (Starting first m <e ins m August XL I zfla Comments This is the time and place. fz)r the' general public to - address the Commission, Items to be dLscaussed here are those which elo rn4�t already appear a) -, this agenda. XIL Adjou mment The Planning Commission, has4d6pted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 p.m. adjournme' ht time. If items go beyond that tfrne, they shall be heam only with the consent of the Comraif lion. I I i 4 i VICINITY MAP X SpHoW= ta) WFLUNIM e c� � �aae ago i w� YI -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ST"F REPORT DATE: July 13, 1988 TO: Chairman and Nembers of the Planning 'Commission FROM; Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Brett Horner, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TRACT 133014 DESIGN REVIEW - LEWIS HOMES - Design review of site pan an u ng arc i _c ure or Trc:t 13304, an approved residential subdivision of 9.27 acras within the Terra Vista Planned Community into 59 'lots, located at the northwest cor-ner of Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain View Drive - APR: 227 - 151 -13. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action R -3nuested Approval of but,ding elevations and plot plans. B. Project Density: 6.36 dwelling units per acre. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North Vacant; Medium Density Residential (8 -14 duelling units per acre). South Vacant; low - Medium density Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre). East - Vacant; Low - Medium Density Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per, acre). West - Vacant; Medium -Nigro Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre), D. General. Plan Designations: Project Site - Low - Medium Density residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre). North - tow - Medium Density Residential (4 -8 dwelling units South per acre). Low - Medium Density Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre). East Low- Medium Density Residential (4 -8 d *11 ing units per acre). West - Low- Medium Density "Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre).' ITEN A.,, PLANN_'NG COMMISSION STAFF.REPOf,, DESIGN REVIEW TRACT 13304 - LEWIS July 13, 1988 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: A. Background: On May 27, 1987, the Planning Comnssion_ reviewed an approved a total deYeioPment package for Tentative Tract 13304. The applicant has since revised the architectural program and is now submitting new plot plan and building elevations for design review approval. B. rieneral: Lewis Homes proposes three (3) 'two -story floor plans, eac wi two elevation design schemes. 184 and 4 -186) were approved for use with Two theOf thetplaans c - (4s have been revised on these two map. However, the elevation plan types. The tentative tract map was approved with provisions for a 15 foot wide greenway trail along the western boundary of the site. The trail has since been relocated along the eastern edge of Mountain View Drive. The vacated trail area will be added_ to the adjacent tract, Tentative Tract 13272. Finally,, to comply with Planning Commission policy, the applicant is providing front yard landscaping since the lots average less than 4,SZO square feet. JMk C. Des, n Review Committee. The Coeinfttee (Emerick, Chitiea, rou rev ewed Fie Pr6posal on May 5, 1988 and recommended: 1. The driveway on Lot 41 should take access off "C" Street. Lots 40 and 41 may be re- oriented to front "C" Street. 2. The applicant should revise the front elevation on one of the three homes. A change in roof line and/or building mass should be made to provide variety i, the streetscape. 3. The use of courtyard walls or Similar structure Should be explored by the applicant to add additional interest to the ons front elevati. The Committee suggested that the detail be designed similar to that used in the Calais Tract (12671). III• FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the Terra Vista Anne ommun —,qO ations and the General Plan. The project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant environmental impacts. In addition, compliance with the the proposed use is in and City Standards. applicable provisions of the Development Code a, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DESIGN REVIEW TRACT 13304 - LEWIS July 13, 1988 Page 3 i IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve t— design review of Tract 13304 through adoption of the t attached.Resolution with conditions. R sP 1iy r B,�l City ner B9;BH.js !Attachments: Exhibit "A* Locaticn Map t Exhibit "a" Site Plan Exhibit. "C" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "D" - Building Elevations Resolution of Appr2val with Conditions f S TRACT 13304 INC M = -- oP m Lu V ! 14C raw Lm #A t� I �a MH P L!! Lm Lp P E LY E Lit W y I W irm _ M P LN LM LIA i op RL N E Lm op w iw P P CC WIC No "�rorwiaw'-- c — _� — 6FC BIliO " Land Use Plan ion go NORTH CI'1 iTEBd: ®R TR 13304 RANCHO CUCAMONGA nTLE: �. T PLANNING pia 'fniq,.IO i � � EXHXBIT:..A : r CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION 14 NORTl$ ITRx >R 13304 TITLE: SITE PLAN EXHIBIT: A. SCALE - �n n. CITY OF RANCHO A PLANNING DIVISION -46 9;k IT'RE -0 ' TR 1X304 TITILE:,`LANDA!rAPE PLANK. Erg %ISIT: ._. SCALE: atione E E is- %4-H 4-H 4-T &S-PA S -PA SITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO EGA PLANNING DIVI9T0N A 7 ITEM TITLE: FLEVATQ PLAN 4 -1;tA EXHIBIT: -1 SCALE: one i::.:;. 4 . i :. 4-IM. -H ;d L.' . CITY OF ANCif o CUcA oNG, A PUNNING DIVISION A 8' ITEM; DR TR 13304 ---- TITLE:. STN EXHIBIT: "w SCALE: ��. Y.. n■ue ea■�C■ _ 1 a..ra OF r' p RANCHO CUCAMODYGA PLANNING DIVISION 4 i -1 SCEs,,_ E moff-aw-uhmm ITEMS TITLE: rXHIBI`P = SCALE: ,. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION A /a- ITEM: _ R FR 13304 TITLE: MMII roc PLAN-4-219 EXHIBIT: i RESOLUTION M0. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA- PLANNING COMMISSION :3RPROVI,NG REVIEW FOR TRACT 13304, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF $9 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 9.27 ACRES OF LANG IN THE LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4 -8 DWELLIWG UNITS PER AMRE), LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF MOUNTAIN VIEW ZAIVE AND TERRA VISTA PARKWAY APN: 227- 151 -13. A. Recitals, (i) Lewis Homes' filed an application for the Design Review of Tract No.13304 as described in the title of this -Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request Is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On the 13th of July, 1988 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a cteeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. (iii). All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. H. Resolut�.or,_ NOW, THEREFORE.., it is hereby found, doterninod and resolved by the Planting Commission of 'tila City, of Rancho Cucamonga as-follows: 1. This Coninission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals„ Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Cormission during the above- ref6renced rneetirig oft July 13, 1988, including written aki oral staff.,reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) That the proposed project iii consistent with ttw objectives of the General Plan; and (b) That the proposed use is in wcord -With the olbjilctive of the Development Dodd and the purposes of the district in which the site is located, and r, t PLANNING COMISSION RESOLUTION No. DESIGN REVIEW TRACT NO. 13304 - LEWIS HOMES July 13, 1989 Page (c) That the:, prepo ed use Is in compliance with each of ,the applicable provisions of the Devel opmen y Code; .; nd (d) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, ;will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3 Bas, ?d upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, and 2 tbo",, this Cumission hereby approves: :;the- .application .subject to each and every condition set forth `19elow and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. (1) The uriveway on Lot 41 shall take access off. "C" Street. Lots 40.,and 41 may be reoriented to front "C"r Street. (2) The applicant shall revise the front elevation on one of the three homes. A change in roof line and /or building mass shall be made to provida variety in the streetscape. (3) The use of courtyard walls or - similar structure shall be explored by the applicant to add additional interest to the front elevations, subject to Design Review Committee approval. (11) All pertinent conditions of annroval for Tract 13304 as cor _lined in Resolution No. 87 -81, shall apply. 4. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED 'THIS 13TH DAY OF JULY 1988. PLANNING COM'b1ISSIN OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: airy e a rman ATTEST: — ra u er, epu y ecre ary PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO., DESIGN REVIEW TRACT NO. 13304 �tVJS HaMts July 13, 1988 Page 3 I, Brad Buller, Oej�.�y 'Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do' hereby certify that the forego°.ng Resolution was duly and regularly Introduced, passed, cnd adopted by the Planning Commission of +.he City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of July 1988, by the following v,Ae -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMMISSIONERS: �r Ira poor Q Sjty for ® ��n$.! �u� P'— Cw L.MyY M�.A� L=L�C 07� �Y�CC L� T�VO yy p C �• y cM Z ~� C E Cy i,i CN�O�d L °Y�v° YO�aS Y LOY�� Yu� LVY.6 �+o�i W s uo mss N3— � � C; ii_ ;i g'� n4 °� £•Y a= Ni ^� CiYC M VOppyyf� �°q'i►� �.AS Y�QN�. 8 �QL Q jCwR Houk,fw y � o- I^; �. Yp, ^Y �O�o•N, w i��NY KOS �O�VY gC� M`�.N �.YO: wg NMN i�r••C� OTL H ^ ®r, N�.� qy S V.Y^ O Y� C �1� Sq >� `• li Y �V >96 ux CC�'wY NTU�B MN' mg .o NUN z 24 • O Ywy w pew .7 {y��. �» Y G G >wri ®��w �Yi' Y �^' �06g �.• i. a •- f+re.L�Z «Zi}c�8a�. ic«u3 �awsY» ll.5"dw ka a It. _N V Y y 6 »�a y. 1e � �". ON p4�. YL 'p »1 �NN O'L'�fl�`•�•��'•� y 9w^Q Q` 1• a � �` � yQ� �. 6^ �g�` � Yw� V �GyN� dei N Y SAS its V1VV111 � �. O V O .7Q V iZEi' n «ewe �.'. EN N N'm �J M �i E tigina p a got v a tLVY M pp L HEW! V@Y�. Opp Gr.^..l 411.1 43wi PO SOD. S:yp 6y LOY MM C •N Ty� u .ppQ C 2Fo�He .. Y Y IQ Sol y y L4.N�N qqyO y. _a iFS•10, 1" GLV �� $�1L16:i �� •.�rC�Y �� i I 1 p� NCC f Ws 8 vivo m �s N p nA, Y V O� + �Y.� NN IBM. Ptla i 2 fi .;C 4 �.3M p >7 gp �aS q C ` pf nom' J ip� �3* bi »y. .s 0. % N > r G ��LY�r O �NM Y.��• C tNi•, � y�i .4V.Ay� AL 9pq6 q0. V.Y ^�� yVy��C i2��b NO ±t;3 D ^ O p ^M U. ai'YUYi�A ya� 'y �b N�. ,per - c s I.N b Q Y Y i �j9 W�Rh G emu.. aM by. y6 CYrEj V.w- j4a M. CA R.= MY�. L;-aL 'vN `yi f Eli! i y e^ a wF.m N °fy al y4 $N p A-34 ff s bp M B32 12 } NC IT 11 N L WY 4 $ 33 > L C �N MCP q 71N Ry ��°!rL � NNG3 K M ^Mll. fY y��ttl O y5.6°gay �. YI 9Nd y� vug-2Y Eli 33 ��Y '+ p -E NZ e _. a�gcyt «ti y�N� O ^IV. L�$��jO�M r ,*�`rp��5 p: O JiO ,,. N „ a ]! a ^ 777777..sTA @ L pMF � :rift: K�I ^yl >NpeY b �fyv{ap wiy� 6YY` a= �e�ft: pRCyy� p 4YYLtlyg �'Y C YYg 9.Y. �rdybe �°i$ �• `LY "�c�+.�AalE2 1 - N ie • ss M pie y.. ' »M �tl 62b'y4..L fd OtV.�L� SIJ L 1s �yG p• N tlpu N Y 11 C C Y N. r b Y c N N N R LOCO C .�.0 7 ty t� °`! .9 2yO w.6.. p�z q {yp.. Nrl. ea V Y p � � N O � N N O � � p � ,�J �> N Mq O �� ♦p .[ ^O p N. KY �rJ4 yy LG S/iy l ts y .� C 7 p a iil.. M CM�4b o O r y 1 ti !I til ♦I f41 I N V LU W di.iJ• 4 D O i y coi A Y V ya�VGC Y yO pmt A N Oyu. Vr9 p�'aw s nu N Y aPi wCC�ti CCOt� LI L ss� �V �Y m �G wVy Y P_ r « L d w P »P P Nc .,g-. L �r c* N Q Y C q yO Y S °.a yppp� w ~! �' G Y Y iF (u ' VI CL C als WN. Y.V4i '� q0 O1�� _y'Y.GR�Ly GCp�4�C � •CVL V�.V� w a 6 0 0 M a^ C C~ y. J M ,fat• y m m 0 to wp C G l7p�,Y®4 Ou 'bp y.N �.aaa 0 VI . C4 OY.' 1r Nye 1J L^ � w •YW.� m O H d 0111 o O. M 03 .GYM .9 L x d.•M� 3.y `o Y� +6.N•y�• Tip�y E.O G ~bw 3 N �C � N � °s� a� a�� @Nay. "p�� gg�.+�r .�� •�..a L �-� 8n m A � u .4 ,mob,.Ii+ w��}}}}} •-^•N tl1 aN.1 w # 6 4 Ks b i 'a O e ��1YY�"c` A►'. gS' @@f ~ p a°� m > N �O'b M,y �a4 6� Gb�7 �6�4° -p0� VYL WL1 .fl tt66 1fI'p`yoe L Z., $ "Va' C L�..• O ip�°� R �` aCN Y6 O_e NN >R NG~ p � : 06 d++ C.G: m _ y °°iS y a�� g $�3 m��°•C►i'�'g��¢j 8'•'� a�� w'�'°'.� � aR+°' vmi C •d %o E N a N ° h w i ` �% .! t � OI ? Ci � � i0 4 M .P6. 6. i Y f 1. � a N C � = y. 1 f ®, c g` a� 4w 4 �T O ` v y # Ywq s.r Y 4 L yy M Nye 11 > U1 �. Ali ' Or N >Y� •• btp 1Y YV G 9M 0400+ N ct u 4 a 9 i s -4 e% •jc$! �y/1 qQ1 C� G 0..LLa �rA %p's. G7 ° ►N M w �p��; Fi` %! tVC'C R�d. G Y ^'�.a•�.v l� u M M V S A C y. Y �• O ~r Np &n.r Q..c 4, .Aar y.� m .O 97 � N •i q e6 GN .°..°L. G V nj v V Ny Yt� Goa NcA4 Y �Q per. 7 w 4 Y OI �� OY Y q4 • Y ��y SyaN O qq �O a ibl w pM4 � yy wQ Vtl• a '� Q ��• ~.Nyb �Y> Yw.Mr �� Ud • tQJ b li +&_n � G L Z C ^9 i 9R GY•G� w PmC ..Sr vzty V � Htl C C C M w 9 M w Y W 'a L� .a. <Ex M Q d b: �w !:7 c g` a� 4w 4 �T O ` v y # Ywq s.r Y 4 L yy M Nye 11 > U1 �. Ali ' Or N >Y� •• btp 1Y YV G 9M 0400+ N ct u 4 a 9 i s -4 e% •jc$! �y/1 qQ1 C� G 0..LLa �rA %p's. G7 ° ►N M w �p��; Fi` %! tVC'C R�d. G Y ^'�.a•�.v l� u M M V S A C y. Y �• O ~r Np &n.r Q..c 4, .Aar y.� m .O 97 � N •i q e6 GN .°..°L. G V nj ♦Y2 V p y. rs G C per. • Y ��y SyaN w P U G Y • 4 Y 6 N Y '� Q ��• ~.Nyb 0 6 �� 43,j m +#• V Y N li +&_n Lr N d pY \� 0YyY ytlC a QL. M4� Htl C C C M w 9 M w Y W 'a L� arA >606 M Q d waAi -Cw �w !:7 Y L LJ V VO VONY4 c g` a� 4w 4 �T O ` v y # Ywq s.r Y 4 L yy M Nye 11 > U1 �. Ali ' Or N >Y� •• btp 1Y YV G 9M 0400+ N ct u 4 a 9 i s -4 e% •jc$! �y/1 qQ1 C� G 0..LLa �rA %p's. G7 ° ►N M w �p��; Fi` %! tVC'C R�d. G Y ^'�.a•�.v l� u M M V S A C y. Y �• O ~r Np &n.r Q..c 4, .Aar y.� m .O 97 � N •i q e6 GN .°..°L. G V nj ti M as �.: = �A.�.. Sw. �r �E� t: �i°te�yjy�+� rt! E r C�.jii7S� Mu3 la. Q. SSS sae3 &3yL Sl w O 7y _N ¢y; YAM! 6 mpG yyy _ Oc w s qwO �1 a fi Y .t of COt� l 6 @ r ar C.i �y W y 3 -Q � Ali- 46- : �iy 7 42 NI oil %y. ta �� i ro . SSM Yw Y NOI . '• r a ^Nam a� <_ �" i ii'�¢ 3 Ts� 1. ypVVy1 .y+�3�i• Y .+Ep`Q' UYN ^pp4D� Cyrb OCiY X41 `N 3.{7(.�c ..��Y V ■�� ®may fYra. �wN Barak O NwL pL N`��y M .� R$ 'bill I I N f yj � AI 9C w o 4 v . �tlµ $ Cyy■ day Y ii Y.�r CfO� tl Y LAN v $� f > L C6 $M^ SDI al y y � 0 21 paAn a N i 4 Fa f Y 1! ; q ee p y N a g K y'+�.0.�° '4 rap i.1i ii�¢e � o�i apr r�. ��p $L r�4 • �� ':�y4y.f W y �eg4 K9 IC. tuzz • �rC9 ° Np �M'!� o�S Fa'g -oS 6L i. �6�N y ~��yA 0 ow Me S C 6 ca :YVYV. 01 O —7�� C2@yVy��Ap .{{.. M f V= mQCC U •c+��@i@ 06@ O¢rq�Y +'Yyj3 49NGw w V v yea H ^GOC c� L j� *C ^ CCC L (ay Na Vy W N .�C• a�i L�a i( HO. C.6C m YN. �� Cy a °a.� �.Y� c C a CC original Poor NOW pis fJ 6 �gOC�u oa«c °w V tl c fha ��.yw 8 + +v S° j ■ ■. ilr Yy C- p 44J N '' 7 »CO D IL �JS~xi xi�� '` C1 Y� v Y atl�b� La ya VN^01 'u Lys. O Y Y� 3 i iN0 Y ^ O m pp YY 0. yy L> Nu NL . •..u� C 00 S i1-a. L =. gf » n aMW^ N $ . L ~ 1OSI U M {y Y n ! y� q L wvs� S��a•��i u N.�M »a $ «� � �°. o° � : u��L. L4 'lu • p. 9 � fiY �M �6'�ft40 Wi C I I l Y 1 _spy sus &l v sips g°4dl �eY1 it O i V gel K ^ C N^ 1 64 V 0 'y � %X PC E 21 gOr �O ay �� * Y��N 1� O T Y�Y� q »i� MJ �Q•N. y =j O ! »LLY �q. )1qqs O.{� •[O O� 4 Y ��at � LL.. �6bS NL •rid gy ^s� `a•° E�L�+ a ` r e O 7� � qV 2. MY� eei ial co �o `•^4t a� �3'Yr +m _-�� •�c MA }'.� $.�' � ^_�L' �d S 1''q" �.s. y °u ''" � �{•{ `.rt °,+apses 4. +(,iyNy,� L• Lp® O u� =�pp`` ;C6 °01GNL - C w C tl O' O Y ro L 0 O �.Y C • V Y i Y Y Y f f p r v 9 0 Twq Cro N N y +YYy+ ''V $$gg id N c1 ...C. �O�i :170 C.' ° =7� aY 1�V4IL p� ^u �� , ��V Ni•�' Rq�� OOr.=, °" WN 4.IY LCL... y �0y0 . u N rf P' N .'1 � N Z ti U4 i 13 E M N N ■ppppp■,,,,,nD L.4 i ��,NC � N..,.�.ss. r6 .. �a1'D iL �> ` is �.x > rt6 4yf YGiOpS N Y. L �pe T.1p- aw. 99 EES] Se Lw, yo yy� ®,[ M s u �� • N�'. it Eli o �. p C2,2 c u �y GGGG IN s fy S L d! M L PgN �` ` 6 � N � �' +�I ie�= e n w�ir p� 66 aii NOnY ps 43 ^ / is 46 b ar W • >p. A y .JC „� ■i a��W Y M YY OY ff_ YN CyrAA C`��1�a L a N. i L L.w� D 9NS • a�i .� N b tY �- ...Era a9i AS @3 .° Y 6 D. a s. L O Y V L Ll � N Z5 ,59 3 G urG .l 4� L �O p � r x • My� i3 4 d V yr N yQr. � A A e M _Y y M N O^ w�M C N aY `� N d u r! a� o+ }1 1 l V V� � �S V1 • Y S^ y o N j Ys `it Y Y e zz w Naw M 4z p v D m'r D O! N C LN > C p p B q p �Dca D vaa si N j c 91 Di s LN� a pp 4' L` M ��yy Lyy,.. y ale p fq 12 °np all r'S YCY ti �ty LL`. vii lit oi'is� Lo•- A � Vym CC -a Y{� b o Sq A L4 «, r aiu maw* ¢M15 }� O U 6th �i a sd L d OL" n� OY v C� �O 23 aw �a ° c L W L =Y` Y xC O 4 6. C$ � yV b I L L Y q V N ` L V i]M YM wy Y v N w �yy O V O Z y Y n A�Yi � a ` L cc ` -15 N ti Y. K L Qom`. 6d jwy� N 4 . ° off» L O L p Y J C V N nom° Y �$rn es� s s.. C d 4 P � C . e M L ON ° Y.V. 0 V�r p�W w Y A I V ^� T dM V L O L. Nix L V a C V w Y Q is' i r � •'� is e °L+ $■� WZ 01,51n 1 past Quality E, F M C Y Y Y gg M M Y s f Ccy � ° y�CQQC `po & Y N Q Y�r L n`^ m sm Y MM .5 G T w _V Msi a p w u� ry EE g. w a L 9 Y sp 4 V Y L L ` v � as va O N y Y .n y a 0 d Y C V V y a� d Y V u° Y < ou, f u •� I t T1� V� HO ZZ 4bI y \6 Ca oau L L Y ii 0 Q V m wu 41a V e�^ A C CI. � �jtw�•Y C y VY V IC r% yO :C YAV. _N 13 0 E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMC:GA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 14 998 TO: Chairman and J�emburs Of the Planning Commission W.11: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Cindy Norris, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: DESIGN ^ r(3. TCNlialIVE TRACT 13749.- BROCK - ine esign review or building a eia ions Site Plan for a previously appraved xentatfve tract, map consisting of 102 single family lists an approximmly 28.57 acres of land in the Low- Mendium Residential District (4 -8 dwelling units per acre), located north of HighiaM Avenue, west of Milliken Aveme, so�ith of Banyan, and east of the Deer Creak Channel - APN: 201 - 271 -55. 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of building elevations and lot plans. B. Project Density: 3.57 dwelling units per acre. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: ing: North - Vacant; Flood Control South - Single Fa;aiiy Residential unaer construction; Victoria PliInned Comwnity - Low.-Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) and 'village Commercial. East - Single Family Residential, Caryn Planned Community. West Deer Creek Channel; flood Control D. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Low -Ped um Residential (4.8 dwelling units per acre). North - Flood Control South. Medium High Residential (1424 dwelling units per acre) East - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre). West - Flood Control I`IElt 8 ;l 1 "°'NING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Rc: U11 FOR TT 13748 - BROCIC July 13, 1988 Page 2 E. Site Characteristics: The project site is currently vacant and as�approx ma a s cPe of 5 Pet-cent from north to south. The site is bounded to the north by Banyan Street, to the east by Milliken Avenue and to the south by the proposed Route 30 Freeway. II. ANALYSIS: A. Back round: On 'December 9, 1967, the Planning Commission approve a total 'residential development /design .A °view far Tentative Tract 13748 .consisting of a total of 232 lots. Associated w.th that project were Ge -eral Plan and Development District Amendments to change the existinm designations from Medium Density Residential and Fiord Control to ow Medium Residential. LOW Since that time, Brock Homes has subMItted a revised design review application for what is now Tract 13748 which encompasses approximately the lower half of the previously approved project, Or 102 single family homes. B. General: The applicant is proposing a total of three floor Pp a—T" ns, each with four elevations, and all two- story. Tile floor plans vary in size from 2,409 square feet to 2,950 square feet. The proposed homes are larger thail those previously approved, which ranged in site from 1,664 to 2,320 square feet, , but are fairly similar in terms of architectural styling. C. Desi n Review COMmittee: On May 19, 1 e es gn ev ew omm ttee fKroutil, Chi ie d J and Emerick reviewed the project and recommended approval subject to the following: 1. The wall design and landscape treatment along Milliken Avenue and Barran Street should be consistent with the treatment on the east side of Milliken Avenue. The wall design should include a stucco coat with natural river pilasteprsl.asteees �xh,lbit Ss cap Provided on the rack 2. Interior corner side yard walls should be designed consistent with the Milliken keenue wall. The applicant has pr"ased a stucco coat treatment. 3• The Milliken Avenue wall design should be carried am,ad the southeast corner of the project. e dLANNING C"ISSION STAFF REPORT RC: OR FOR TT 13748 - BROCK July 13, 1988 Paga 3 4. An enhanced landscape treatment, consistent with that on. Mill :ken Avanue, should be wrapped around the southr-ast corner to the west property line of Lot 11. See Exhibit E. 5. The pine trees proposed at the southeast corner of the site should be of a spreading variety. 6. A combination of mounding and landscaping should be lrovided adjacent to Lott 10 and 11 in order, to mitigate the appearance of the soj wall. The applicnrr` has rev 'ed the landscape plvr address this o�xjdition. 7. Architectural detailing should be provided on all side and rear elevations with an enhanced treatment provided for those unfts which bW. #on or side-on to Milliken Avenue or the Freeway right -of -way.. The app'l'icant has provided ar enhanced treatwnt f'or all elevations see Exhibit F. 8. Natural field store should be used on the elevations rather than a manufactured veneer. 9. The wall along Milliken ind Banyan should be of a nigh quality construction. 10; DriveNay wi.trts shou`:d be narrowed to 16 feet through the public parkway for all driv -,ways that have a long depth (i.e. Lots 16 and 17). All other driveways should be narrowed to a 20 -feet width unless the front setter k is too shallow. In those cases- a decorative paving treatment should he used to breL.. up the pavement area. 11* applicant has prodded a revised site plan adulressirp, tANese ca■aents, see Wbit t D. Grading Committee: The project was reviewed and approved by W-Gradlilg Comittee on May 15, 1988. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the eve opm C o e an the General Plan. The project will not be detrimental to the adjacent properties or cause significant environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use and site plan together with the recomendeki Conditions of Approval, are in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Developm3nt Code and City standards. f U PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT' RE: OR FOR TT 13748 - $ROCK July 13, 1988 Page 4 IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Co mission; approve t ie e gn review of building elevations and plot plans for the 102 nits through the adoption of the attached Resolution Conditions of Approval. and Resp ll.1 gowtted, d ra i., r Cit 3B :CN:mlg ` Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Exhibit "B" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "C" Grading Plan Exhibit "D" Landscape Plan Exhibit "E" = ..Revised Landscape at SE Corner f Exhibit "F" - Elevations> i Exhibit "f" - Floor Plans Exhibit "'H" - Milliken and Banyan Wall Des-,gig Exhibit "I" - Driveway Resigns i a --TACK NORTH *TY OF ITEM: RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: PLANNING DIVISION 55- EXHIBIT, SCALE: 1 ' r O s 9 Ell, NOW*, ITEM: TITLE: EXHIBIT! 2 Qr A T Vi [1- NORTH lKTY OF ITEM: RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: PLANNING DIVISION 87 EXHIBIT: Alt SCALE- ......... E M- :mug sue_ ;n rccewM e H song oara ae�w �.... • i3i7'�i CStr i 0 EROgYCONTF10l 6 TITY OF A,N,C'JH0 CUCAMONGA PLALKNING DIVISION Z- =.=A TITLITEM: E: EXHIBIT--l-fl- SCALE*. IT � mo a _ r —)F .� N H CUCAMONGA DIVISION r a°ae.� EXHIBIT.-kL .— SCAT X- - l BPI CU(-,'AMAXTn A P." DIVISION ITEM:- TITLE: EXHIF-IT: SCALE! -0-2 11 ;N Wq (100 'q HPM ) sTe aT .4/ �J I —� i c ' ci 6 8 T ' BBRl4f ' Tq AL fiT.) 0 <S tiw S� (VITY OF ITEM: PLANNING DIVISION 803 EXHIBIT 1 CC �r 1J w 4 Z k-2 D C. Z `and3c�0o�it ;N Wq (100 'q HPM ) sTe aT .4/ �J I —� i c ' ci 6 8 T ' BBRl4f ' Tq AL fiT.) 0 <S tiw S� (VITY OF ITEM: PLANNING DIVISION 803 EXHIBIT LIE CUCAMONGA ,PYANNING DIVISION Bl� 05j�- 0 -c-mumm ITEM, --- 10 r TITLE: EXHIBIT: SCALE: cow Rw= - A n m CITY OF RANCHO cu�Amf TLANNI ING DIVISION ITEM: TITLE: S XHIBM-E-1- SCAT P.- op-ownwrim 'M MIM i I. I +111 111 l�lll all, it ..:mIlifill, 11111 . V I. ...... I. .... 11f . U.11111t1t. It. JiN, tti I A411 11111 1111111111111 (111111 li 1 {1111 II IT; I GREG%' 01) -.Cl-T-Y- OF RANCHO r%-7T MONI-1 A CA kxa P LAUN "NING MVISION Ble M-rrowo ITE TITLEM 0 EXHIBIT--&r- SCALE: W �.lall CITY OF ITEM RANCKC1 CUCAMONGA TITLE: PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBZ!Ake SCALE!_ La Im nma nh CITY OF ITEM RANCKC1 CUCAMONGA TITLE: PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBZ!Ake SCALE!_ La Im C � I I F R �i rs IXTY O RANCHO CUCAMON A Ties: „ P N14ING DIVISION l Zxixo SCALE:._.,..,. .` I v Cl LA x rm 12 f 1, - 114- 0yr---'c / f� ,° �• \. �'es.ca ��'F' e' ke� .tam ED�• i NV .iCLE.r.. f.. Aal err .Ni.�•.. 'f i i ♦p • ts. oft -- h11.LLiKEN b — RANCHO F ITEM PLANNING DIVISION %AMONG A TITLE: e43 E iiIBI° :-Z.' SCALP,. n" RESOLUT ?ON 44. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONiGA PQ'4NING C"ISSION APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT SIC}. 13746 a BROOK LOCATED NORTH OF HIGHLAfM AVENL , WEST OF MILLIKEN, %LTH OF BANYAN IN TPE LOW MEDIUM N,8 DWELLINGS UNITS PER AdRE) DISTRICT API: 201- 271-55 A. Recitals. (i) M.J. Brack & Sons has filed all App— zicaticn for the Design Review of Tract Va. 13748 as described in the .title of this Resolution, Hereinafter, the subj Xt Design Review request is referred to as "tire application". (ii) On July 1& 1988, the Planning Cornmissia� of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a rating t* Consider the application. (iii) All legal prerequisftes to the adoption of thi$ Resolution have occurred. $,o, Resolution. °fanni NOV, THEREFIRE, it is hereby found, determined and :Iesoly €d by ire ng Cowission of the City of Riltuiao Cucamoega as follows: l h i s aa of R% ruorre facts forth in This s Prt t is 0 Fu finds e te andcoc 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to the th s Co mssion nspo�hiCmg 1pi s s fli#and Oralt f reports, OMiss meting ysecf3C� y fi d aoo " 1. That t I proposed project is consistent with V4 objec�aves of the General Plan; anti 2. That the proposed design is in accord with the, objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district I, wtoch the site is located,, and S. That the PrDPOS$d design is in to "piiance with each of the applicable provisions of the vel*pmtnt Code; and 4. That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or Welfare, or materially injurious to properties or Improvements in the vicinity. Bay PLANNING CC4MISSION RESOLUTION NO. RE: DR FOR TT 13748 - BROCK July 13, 1988 Page 2 In 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in aaragraph l and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves tha application subject to each and every rendition set forth below and in tFe attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this refere9ce. Planning Division (1) The wall ,`sign and landscape treatment along Milliken Avenue and Daryan Street shall be consistent with the treatUent on the east side of Milliken Avenue. The wall design shall include a stucco coat with natural river rock pilasters with a cap provided on the rock pilasters. (2) interior corner side yard wdllc shall be designed consistent with the Milliken Avenue r,4ll. (3) lne Milliken Avenue wall design shall be carried around the southeast corner of the project. (4) An enhanced landscape treatment, consistent with that on Milliken Avenue, shall be wrapped around the southeast corner of the site to the west property line of Lot 11. ^c (5) The Pine trees propotied at tha southeast corner of the site shall be of a spreading, variety. (4) A cembination of mounding and landscaping shall be provided adjacent; to Lots 10 and 11 in order to mitigate the appearance of the sound wall. (7) The final landscape and irrigation plans shall be revi^wed apd approved by the City Planner and City Engipaer. (8) Arzhit&;Vral detailing shall he provided on all side and rear elevations with an enhanced treatment provided for those units which back -on or side -on to Milliken Avenua or the Freeway right- of -Kdy. (+) Natural fieldstone shall be used on the elevations «ather than a manufactured veneer. (101, The wall along Milliken and banyan shall be of a high quality construction. t2't) Oriveww widths s'ha'll be narrowed to 16 feet through the public parkway for all driveways that have 'ong depths (i.e. huts 16 and 17). Al; other drivexays should be narroyead to a 20 -foot width ug7ess the front setback is too shallow. In those cases, a decorative poing treatment shall be used to breakup the pavement `t PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. RE: DR FOR TT 13748 - BROCK k� !, July 13, 1988 r Page 3 i (12) indicate the locatin•t of the 19 replacement trees on the landscape plan. Engine €,ing Division (1) The line of sight on Lot 87 (65 on original Tentative Tract) shall be limite.4 to low ground cover not to exceed 2 inches in heit ;, (2) All Ergineering conditions for Tract Ws. 13748 shall apply, 4. The Deputy Secretary to this Comission shall certify to the adoption of this Iesoiution, APPROVED AND iWOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF JULY, 1988. PLANNING C"ISSION OF THE CI!7 OF RA14CHO CUCAMONGA BY: arty 7c —61, man —n— ATTEST: ATTEST: ra u er, epu y ra a� -- I, Brrsd Buller, Deputy SOC -etArY of the ;Pian01t g . Cowission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do heresy cerr,:, fy that-* foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, pass6f, and adopted by the Planning COMission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a Mgkglar meeting of the Planning COW�jssion held on the 13th day of July, 998, by tia followin7 voce -to -wit; AYES: COMthlISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: C"ISSIONERS: fi R �l V LLI R a I _ C)fi-,Olraa Poor s��rdUOC�iYHf q M OaV 6 M W fl�yYw Y� °y'L! +Y w.Y. zv Y��Q{y1n lixt vua� O- 9 O W U N a Q •J L + P »� O I� NYqY. rD _•��p^p Y� ' O tC .•Y� j dl f r3 SIR., % SIR, Yra y�6 t3 _ RR _ y -12 � 8 lit w g H p �;Jla a . » �I XI N " �► ui lit, Y rW M ` � •, p8 », Oice`.i` Mw A r A Y r s� 64y OW rrL V ` w Q A ~~ r 3 N hlM J S.c y i �► ��l�uiiCf. �.. u �` % n � M� • ate, ,�� LA 9 .N{- W Q WA-11 or j* A .w aY Isis Mz 14. a a.S an w a�3 upCN'NNy NsOa us, "C° '.'E* m6 � ,tC: I': >� t~y� OY �4Y �V t.N. �VAs rRw� V�wGpM. C� G� ^�. Yr » .�.�p� Off► Qa'�ias w 4 Q r � u Zy + b�r,p�awYir# yi e CF.: ti YY�� N�foF � a � i4t t - ` 1 3V $4 • g y V M » 6wr1r Y At Q Y »4wQ v.-" +i p ;Ili g mw . �+ ew 'a ' u .54 °R. &�„�� i,,..r.3k NSF k;M �4 ` CrP �}rf � { -' sy `�y1 Air �y� :1 • nf„w d N ! s yr Y b 4 q +W iLLLyLO OV it O�`� t► s~•�dytag01 als Sua V�f L Awp N � 6 Y 4 p Y tt Ng"G p + w V �Q �� V • C.'q. a +CL a ■�. 4 p w Cr u v A L 4 Y L » ib wN?i Vr N'Q �S r�wI3. vwt� 9GN w ■.c �S w � V- yP VVP Ob A. q \�ww� � W 0E -yz QOtl sR R Y bb}Rpp� M L� 4 �Li 7Cr. {y w ayFa a�a� .6RM uY�g�Q� ° M a b a��wS ou� S�'t. N us u.°+u� �.NaN�yVy r�aw� " » g� �I 6 yu h, `$ Y » my N ricu M %--x fJQ w �BMiitCa Lo 4 �Yy to %p a„ °, 1 *a »K 14 4 Ll OOO COO Q tl C �_N 0c0 CO CCO'-1[I Y�{�L (y`�M �i' Y O1 y ►Q. ^ V�C►• ��(( �G A OI�y �� aEOOfyYCYL• I`• >'O wyLY yN d 09 'O ��^ P6�a Nii �• C 7�uo. O A�Y�. Q ``N OO Y � r' y�eflgCCrt� 4l�r. pL ac � y M fY i $b _O q r�ld 4 �yy V"�Z^esp••N �• � $ A C o•C "C3 a yyy "�� :1.°y� Lam• �'uN :'�.. ��uL�oLal�w,a�' '�' Y �.� T � N^ 3 +& ai ag+y'Y�t his OS N w YYO� uN�y ± OygG YN.�,j. p,o LyLG �p�.o apC �M �pA F:T C fi p� yV ^• �N � }�g¢ rNrVfj Q-3y •M�Y a� �I�{�YYL� N�4 � ��x.��g ��$�0� -9 gy�ppy� ��Fh Eli -21 '� 8 - Ra . ds`y� law► gy � �gyyS wn,`Le► use: tlpos ■$i ��gg- <w »� 9MV Y�a.L vw c�}�. .�`a _ v¢� Vpa .ryrsg jai 8�aiudr s� 0.A {WJp avv[pp❑��8 3 s a < f :'Zs •9 3 o ' » F:?3 g ce'� a as $,,v €.. �� T.+vnL' �Qe aggf # awgw „rOn. N,.ys lip ^ 'may Lr i iG Vrw ± a NOw. N AJ jam01Y I. Ca4YU s ®� �y tl D^ "eewitw Pli O��d {`�A pQy ay0 4C. tl V3t+ rte. q��1Q�O Ll�yj q.C� 4 Q~d 3A_.eCpw 'rc 7y. S.erdy d Qua 1�s Q.Wtl ^ + &tla YD ^.O N`g INq�M V a�N A.`� 4aum ^0� O UVm N4$MW �� t^ P� �N1.7G�8YC �wyy �,p� Oe�C `Q+ d•^ 7 6+A M i \J ^ Y M� ■� V {C�^ 2,w. yq. Y,4�eL.:u wN �+ ^.• A Nd ■u0..aa `. 47s. (C YJn <'ON PO.N ► 6t �C�l �.�� tl •� EY Y+y. ► ♦ QV <Q POW�7 �CI Cl� IICN L� Wa 6�.T V1�M i\ �� X h n1 1 •PI ,p � .r N L 0 W i 0. 91 Poor ronOty avi n.. �r�2 :. 112H `C ��Ed _� a,Ct► ail: aw Qm c q t70 � IY & yy�!!�aij S " 9HR sr bi 04 °!p�: pi sail Vai li;Z;- 2 0. 'via 5a la i+ p a■ w gym. 6 E� y C,�t� iii q Y �] u� yy � It M fi. N V M A r ter. w�' .q..V 4 IAC ` s a Y s Elm r zci i V p 6 b w ay3� LIZ V. .9 4cc Q u y Vg L , Ili NE ViiV i n. Y +ly —P6.Vi1 vNLyyP e-vt ++��Id 11.0 °i yIt! yY�q o rd's W p n.. �r�2 :. 112H `C ��Ed _� a,Ct► ail: `�asos Qm c q t70 � IY & yy�!!�aij S ills bi 04 °!p�: pi 3% r.$ Vai li;Z;- 2 0. 'via 5a la i+ p a■ w gym. 6 E� y C,�t� iii q Y �] u� yy � It M fi. N V M A r ter. w�' .q..V 4 IAC ` s a Y s Elm ._LZ 3 �a.o • C N A L 6 V Q a. i d ills i 6 6Vyi V.. .1a 6 2 0. 'via 5a la i+ p a■ w gym. 6 E� y cq M pp 4 Q q a a' ` s a Y m Elm r zci i V p 6 b w ay3� LIZ V. .9 4cc Q u y Vg L , Ili 1A w a 149 yIt! SA-16 r is Y w C 'U Ito Y y z ri z rod .y q r M� 11 f N i% C .; 1, A ~s ue V Xie m 6Vyi V.. .1a 6 2 0. 'via 5a la i+ `a o �yy � a■ w gym. Y cq L pp 4 Q q a u � v Isis "o r zci i V p 6 b w ay3� LIZ V. .9 4cc Q u y Vg L I S n i yyV .1 m N n ^r; g 4 M V � NN tab a� �o u w v 4 s 0 Y Cl � K Y Q O N OMY CY ac i' W q tl �g a� 4 Wuy� W �aN �!w �I 1 4 by .� tli 5 q� L V H E d L9gR 11 « L w -.~ »n w3�]ptG N *i v i. QUM' tlRw 6 Zoe 2A .1H s 1 a 9 aww 3 L 9 3 '$'¢� L W L C a$� CC4YTK �_.. v 'ell EMC V' sM =rpQ. C,4tl U� .yea L! �C yg�y1+ Q�►rN• Cp wC YA i. oE. g CY G Qa —j !} .- -I 9-8 Irn y.MW AV ♦ 40 YYO V+�iTY bit N Vol w IS g 21 /y� N W Y vn aR a7 iw y' S O 6'Y Y ^y 3� V ��yR pGyS 4 �y�a qyN b •� Y 66�j6'i.�nge �.�tlj'� Sa„ CiS. 1,11113 ? ° �ux�. �+M�rr m 'C V�L N Vwp fie. �� aaiea IL. N° L�5 Jy�yl u Oq ^1 i T IA Q ' . A4� 4•Y,i� Y'A �. �9 YNV �� _06�y _Y9 {y�'40� COV�t��. }I Usk yQy tt M ar'•� Tits yM}!V4pY 1 7iVC wU. 'k o(�g ° v +�iv�vi:a. 4 °4►�'a- p'iM°.,`,'i�y'g°y�` Psi: q1 � q �C19C � 4n TJw V. Or "91nal POOr t �E di'rte �. a <a •J LOS Y NpY O} MCG LCt q O�{qr o .°$ vL.S. it `cc ,o O GysC�. GG� YirY - y� nS'. =�$SCN �y ii 9r� J1 YwC py� q> H .. p0 �,q Y• MpNc� ag q12 i P gas b:. PAL "S 5 «Y Or �•L� qa LT ti V. Y.OMNq Gh Y O.M W L �y ey` 0y Cy��slb!L �yL rA3VpV' ►: ,��'ay�y�T ^g H am.g{ ■« � �6. yt V� ^g �l g, ..�.1 i2- 9� 1R is �� ap y3.�Nr UEp�y�. i7�O N,1° tRV kIi.S �tJ 4a 4-2ab 1y tai: Li 9. Ba s C � v L NNpy y Y a u e N2:1T uM 2 6 OM �•' JJ a L6• .gig G. r ; :Op w■ I® S s s N v v o e, it m Sg g tag IRS Apr TL g6 ilk q : $s�g A qqi'� y�Y E 'as Ir g^ i. y'y9e °ug yy4 IMP r, W I -- �y - -Xg j Q N � !"� ,p. ^ � 4 a to SVIo Y�y 'P.7 O O C C. a iT qcC a �/rt�q OCpW YIY7 C:lb�sY Q+J C. t r W ti�m Q. qLl N 6W iO rOn 6 CAW: 12J i 0 CITY -OP RANC IQ cucAmowGA STAFF REPORT" DATE; July 13, 19a., TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Cumission FROM. Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Miki Bratt, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASItril ANT Amn GE p= +l�tiC I iAifAEN�`J� 11 Ili reques o men a rcu a ro� n``-oce = General Plan to widen Cherry Avenue from :the intersection of 24th Street ,(existilsg Sti Avenue) to Interstate .15 from a collector to a teconJi4ry arterial with a 110 foot right -of -why and to widen 24th Street, east -of -the loop, (existing Summit 4venue} to a 110 foot rigri -:of -way . (2) Amend the Master plan of Trails of the General Plan to relocate the trail on the south side of 24th Street, east- Of-the-loop, (existing Summit Avenue) to the north side of 24th Street, east -of- the -loop, along the northerly City boundary and to delete a, portion thereof. ENVIROWENTA.L ASSESSMENT AND ETiWAYDA ,SPECIFIC PLAN requPa to amen a was. a pec c PT an o „widen Cherry Avenue from the Intersection of 24th Street 'existing Summit Avenue) to ;'nterstate Tar from a collector to a secondary arterial with a 110 foot right- of-way and to widen 24th Stri east -of- the -loop (existing Chterrry Avenue) to a :11vicinity ght- yiyntet2) intersection he Master Plan of Trails to relocate the trail o) the south side of 24th Street, east -of- the - loop, (existillig Summit Avenue) to the north side of 24th Street, east-of-the- loop, along the northerly City boundary and to delete a portion thereof. I. AaSTRACT: The original amendment to the Circulation Element of the nera Plan and to t,e Eti'Aanda Specific Plan for Cherry Avenue was initiated by First Cities Properties (Staff Report of Juror 22, 1988, Exhibit "A ", Location), However, because Cherry Avenue, as well aj the Loop Road and 24th Street, east of the Loop lir:td (Summit Avenue), will be important entryways to the City, -liae Planning Commission has requested special landscaping with 11i islands for these three roadways which would require additional right -of -way. (Staff Report of June 22, 1988, Exhibit "C" and "D ") --- ITEMS C AND A . . PLANNING COWISS1ON STAFF REPORT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -02B July 13, 1988 Pagel First Cities Properties has also requested amendment to the trails (Staff map Report of June 22, 1988, Exhibit "B" Location), request deletion of the trail section eastr.ard along 24th Street, (S=it .Avenue) from the property boundary at San Sevaine dash to the I -15 Freeway because they are routing: the link with the regional east -wean equestrian trail thfough the Hunter's Midge project. Along 24th Street (Summit Avenue) in the vicinity of San Sevaine Wash, it is recommended that the equestrain trail bn located on the northside of the street. Tt , "rake these changes in the Circulation Element of the General tan and in the Etiwanda Specific Plans the attached resolutions should be adopted. II. B&(CROUNO: The A.pplicant's request and the Planning Comission's recUmen ation are discussed in the Staff Reports of May 259 1988 and June 22, 19W This staff repgrt provides a brief chronology for this application. Planning Commission Meeting of Pi 25, 1988: On this gate, a —}r 1 request y rs itY" per amen a Circulation Map of Aft the General Plan and to amend the Circulation Plan and Trails Map of the Etiwande. Specific Plan was brought to the Planning i Commission. Ap licantssRe_quest: The applicant's request to increase the right- O'way ±orgy Avenue, including proposed street sections are discussed in the Staff report of May 25, 1986. (See attached,) Planning Co=is - ion request. At the May 25, 1938 meeting the anning 0m 1stun reques ed consideration of specie, street designatio.s and wider :^fight -of -ways for Cherry Avenue; 24th Street, east of the Loop Road; acid for the Loop Road. The special street t.- eatmenc would include the installation of median islanIs as a natural extension of the gateway fun;.tion of the Cherry Avenue /I -15 intersection. The Commission request for special street designations are discussed in the Staff Report of dune 22, 1988. (See attached) j I AUL PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ' GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -028 July 13, 1988 Page 3 3 Trails Committer Review: On June lb, 1988, the frafls;iomnittee reviewed ne- vequest to amend the Trails Map, TK, Committee supported deletion of the tram east of Chcrrf Avenue. They also felt that if there is a safe equestrttn crol;'sing ":,ti the intersection of 24th Street and the north -south ejaestria.,'trail provided by Etiwanda Highlands, then the equestrian trail along 24th Street st,ould be locates on the north side of Fie street where it grosses San Sevaine Wash. Plannin Commission meeting of June 22, 1988: on this d -te a j second con inuan.e was r_quas e .so t.a e e ect of eider right- of-ways, irt:luding the installation of median islands, on existing i development plans on adj�7cent properties, cruld be reviewed. The applicant, First Cities Frirperties, supported the continuance. Special VAeting, July 6, 1988; The applicant and adjacent property owners - met with the "�i _yy Naff to discuss engineering, design and cost concerns. ' *'L fsilits of that meeting were not available in time to be included With th-,, staff report, but will be part of the oral presentation by staff. l III. RECOWENDA,ION. Staff supports the Plannir..g C/1 mission recomnenTanion that Cherry Arenue, 24th Street, east of thi loop, and the Loop Road be treated as specia'i streets with median islands. To implement the 'recom endationzt, the Planning Commission should adopt tye attached resolutions in support of the amendment to the Circulation 'Element of the General Plan and the ameneknent to the Ftiwanda. %Specific Plan, I Res . ly s ttpd, Br Bu ,r Ci t er �% t Bh : MR :ml g Attachments: Planning Commission Sams Report with Attachments, June 22, 1988 Tralls Committee Minutes, May 25, 1988 Off' r+rmv nW n narnrrn .,,r,,. -- . DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: I. June 22, 1985 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Miki Bratt, Associate Planner Nll wju suuzn sloe or 24tn Street, east -of -tire -loop, (existing Summit Avenue) to the north side of 24th Street, east- of, -t ►,e -loop, along the northerly City boundavy and to delete a. portion thereof. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - Y "cR? W= gTest amen e t w e an 'o w an Cherry Avenue from the intersection of ?4th Street (exir,cing .Summit Avenue) to Interstate 15 from a collector to a secondary arterial with an 116 foot right -lrf -way and to ;widen 24i1a Street east -of -the -loop (exist!Q Summit Avenue in the vicinity of the intersection with Cherry Avenue) to a 110 foot right- ofr;aay. (2) Amend the Master Plan of Trails to relocate the trail on the south side of 24th Street, edst of- tha..loop, (existing Summit Avenue) to the north side �_ 24th Street, east -of- the -loop, along the northerly City boundary and to delete a portion thereof, ABSTRACT: The original amendment to the Circulation rk-'tement of the snare Plt,n and to the Etiwandd Specific Plan for Cherry Avenue was initiated by First Cities Properties (ENhibit "A`°, Location), Lo However, because Cherry Avenue, as well as the op Road and 24th Street, east of tKe Luop Road (Summit Aveftl, will be important entr,•,ways to the City, the Planning Commission bas requested special landscapinq wit4 median islands for these three roadways ut,ich would require additional right -of -way. (Exhibit "C" and "D") C�� PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF'RENOPT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -02B June 22, 1988 Page 2 First Cities Properties has also requested amenrk,leiit to, the trails map (Exhibft "3 Location). They request deletion of the trail section eastward along 24th Street, (Summit Avenue) from the property boundary at San Sevaine Wash to the I -15 Freeway because they are routing the link with the regional east -west equestrian trail through ,.he hunter's Ridge project. Along 24th Street (Summit Avenue) in the vicinity of San Sevaine Wash, it is recommended that the equestrian trail be located on the northside of the street. To make these changes in the Circulation Element of the General Plan atfd in she Etiwanda- S'pecif'ic Plan, the at Uahed resolutions should be adopted, II. BACKGROUND: The original application to amend the Circulation ..amen of the General Plan was readvertised at the request of the Planning Commission to consider the following changes Mihibit "E" and "F "): o Widen Cherry Avenue from 24th Street east of the Loop, from a collector to a seccrdary arterial with a right -of -way road section of 110 feet. o Wideii 24th Street east of the Loop (Summit Avenue), from a collector to a seccndary orterial with a right -of -way road section of 110 feet. The purpose of increasing the right -of -way for Cherry Avenue (Figure 5-36); for 24th Street, east of the Loop (Figure 5 -35); and for the Loop Road (Figure 5 -34) is: (See Exhibit "C" ead "D ") o Provide width for the addition of x landscaped median ftfl and in each road; o Through the use of landscaping and other me&ns, create an adequa,e gateway Ntatement for a major entrance into the City, the Etiwanda Gearmunity and the North Etiwanda Community. IIi. ANALYSIS, MEDIAN ISLANDS: Engineering staff has reviewed the above prupisals an3" iiecmr:QM cs installation of 14 -foot median islands in CX: rry Avenue (Figure: 5 -36); its 24th Street east of the Loop (Fiiguve 5- 36); and the Loop (Figure 5 -34). (See Exhibits "C" and 13 D "). i% PLANNING COMM SSTOW STAFF REPORT GENERAL PLAIT AMENDMENT 88 -028 June 22, 1988 Page 3 Cherry Avenue (Figure 8 -36) would be expanded to include 64 feet of ,+a+ ng, a me tan island, and additional parkw -y landscaping for a total 110 -foot right -of -way. The applicant itas identified the flood control facilities or .'the west side of Cherry Avenue as a possible constraint to constructing the roadway, median island, sidewalks and parkway to the full 110 - foot right -of -way width.. These issues are being reviewed by the Engineering Vvisiot and _'ny problems or constraints can be resolved prior tc approval of an actual construction project. San Bernardino County Flood Control District has been asked to comment on the proposal and their staff is reviewing notions. One possibility would be to move the centerline of Cherry Avenue to the east In that portion of Cherry Avenue where the flood control facilities cannot be modified. Since the minimum w dth for a median island is 14 feet and the ntnimun pavement For the predicted revel of traffic would be 64 feet, therefore; the ory fl'exibil'ity is in the wid=th of the sidewalks and Sat >,dscaped parkways. A narrower parkway and deletion of the sidewalk on the west side of Cherry Avenue adjacent to the flood control facilities could also reduce the width of the right - of -way. 24th Street, east of Loop Road (Figure 5 -35) is culm s?rtly planned or a right-of-way o eel. In order to accommc4aite a median island, rigtit -of -way should `ae increased to 110 feet. The Loa Road (Figure 5 -34) is currently planned for a right -of -way o� ` median island can be added without increasing the right -of -Wary, if the landscaped parkway is reduced on each side of the roadway. Planning staff supports the inclusion of the landscaped median islands for the above roads as an appropriate visual s� -k between the 24th Street Parkway and the major City ent:,r at the intersection of the 1 -15 Freeway and Cherry Avenue. (See exhibit 11W). Trails: The Trails Committee reviewedi ttji3 proposal at their MeR ng of June 15, 1988, but comments rei ^e not available ir, time to be Included in this staff report bu•, 'will be reported at the Planning Commission Hearing. The trails map (Exhibit "B ") shows planned trail ektensions. �p 0 U PLANNING GOMMUSSION STAFF REPORT GENERAL Pt AN AMENDMENT 8R -026 June 22, 1988 Page 4 One extension is a continuation of the CitY Community Trail System along the west side of San Sevai»e Wish as part .of' the Eti_wanda Highlands Planned Coir�nun!ty. The othor extension travels north on the east side ` <of Sang �.a�, a hash - as part of ,he Hunter 's 'Ridge Planned Community in` tl, City of Fontana. The latt r trail connects to an east -west extension, of the Count 'Regional Trail Gys.em and also links with the C "Pestrian Traithead planned within th• Hunter's Ridge Community, The H<•nter`s Ridge Regional Trail Plan replaces the pla;:ned extension along the I -15 Freeway, IV. EwRONMEbTAL ASSESSW'kh"f, An environmental assessirot has been c0mPlerea'U" ; -'aff. terse effects have been identified as a consequence of 4,Oending the General Plan or the Etiwanda S~evit,F_ Plan. Therefore, `xhe Planning CoWssion should recommend approl, Negative Declaratfion under the California Ens,;ironmental Quality Ate- V. FACTS FOR FINDINGS* The;'followin_i firiding�: can be mad €s (a) The amendment does not conflict with the t; PLANNI -0 CO.MISSION STAFF REPG.:' GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88.028 June 22, 1988 Page 5 Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map - Streets Exhibit "8" - Location Map - grails Exhibit "C" - Cherry Avenue Exhibit "D" - 24tH Street, East of the Loop and the Loop between 24th Stect and I -15 Exhibit "E" - Plar►ning Commission Staff Report of May 2E'n 1988 Exhibit "F" - Pisnnirg Commission Minutes of May 25, ; 1988 Resolution Recommending Approval of General Flan Amendment 88 -OB Resolution Recommending Approval of Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 88 -01 i i I l ■f , as =A I, ic Am ,,. 4 PROTECT AREA-' t it Opp " ;�. WC nm(' ��ry. •' Freeway Access Majvr Arterial rf , Owmwm Secondary ArteriiJ rr f MM SPecl3l DeWgn IL 1 rnnnf Local Streets Mq W ANNA SPECIFIC PLAN CITY OF STREET SYSTEM E ' t 71is♦ EX y NM l i HI R GAG t' C BIT- SCALEt 14 TH 4RI v Z, it r r J i IL FWTH&L m xg .2 Of RATNCrD CLrA PLAINN �N% D(VIWJ TlIU-. I �Iku� EXHISdi SCALE: N WE-- PROTECT AREA �wsg HUNT i\L FUDID PROTECT DELETE/ TKA!L/ SECTIOK Aye. — Equestrian Trails auvnm Bike Lane (in Pmvemont) Bike Path (in Powvay) NOUH Jo 0701-02 o 7-13-88 PC Agenda o . ( I % � � 9 7- - ---7 E10'RQW CHERRY AVENUE PROPOSED FIG. 5- 3v FLOWF-F,I%G TREES EX J'41AI,CAAlDf CITY OF I'mm, fi�r�1V11 � T[iLE= �„�,.- CNE��'Y AVE I�lG DIVISCi`a1 , �. — clv/ PTlWAPJ t QDW-1 =16- ®i AM LOOP 139tw *®n 24th and 1 -15 PROPOSED FIG. 24IVj. STREU Eat of Loop 1 ®. CI"' rw PLANNING uIVISION EXHIBIT:__ fC°`SCALE, UO2 E 0 I * CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 25, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of' the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Miki Bratt, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -02B - FIRST CITY PROPERTIE5 - request to amena the Circulation Element of-the General Plan to widen Cherry Avenue from Summit Avenue (24th Street) to Interstate 15 from a collector, to a secondary arterial with an 88 foot right -of -way road section; and (2) to amend the Master Plan of Trails of the General 'Tian to relocate the trail on the south side of Summit Avenue to the north of Summit Avenue alorig the easterly City boundary. ENVIRONMENTAL. ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFYC PLAN AMENDMENT - amen men to the Etiwanda pec c an o w as4 Cherry Avenue from Summit Avenue (24th Street) to , 4rstate 15 from a collector to a secondary arterial wE n an 88 foot right- of-way road section; and (2) to amend the Community Trails Map of the Etiwanda Specific Plan to relocate the trail on the south side of Summit Avenue to the north of Summit Avenue along the easterly City bc'indary. I. ABSTRACT: These applications request amendment to the Circulation 'E%menl -of the General Plan and to the Etiwanda Specific Nan to widen the ultimate right -of -way to 88 feet for Cherry Avenue and Summit Avenue, as well as to make sl.gh' adjustments in the regional equestrian trail system. This action will serve to resolve k:ertain legal obligations on the part of the applicant resulting from the annexation of the Hunt Club property by the City of Fontana. Based on traffic projections for development of the Hunt Club property as defined by the Hunter's Ridge Specific Plan and environmental review, staff supports the proposals. However, based on review of the future development of the area as a major entry into the City, staff recommends designation of Cherry Avenue between the I -15 Freeway interchange and Sunimit Avenue as a "special highway" and recommends increasing the ultimate right-of- way to 110 feet in order to provide for apropriate landscaping. C�At3 PLANNING COMNiSSION STAFF REPORT GPA 88- 02B /ESPA 88 -01 - FIRST CITY 'PROPERTIES May 25, 1988 Page 2 If the Planning Commission concur;; with the staff recommendation, the item will need to be readvertisi.1 and brought for public hearing at tha June 22, 1988 Planning Commission meeting. II. LOCATION: The application site is 'located in the vicinity of Summit and Cherry Avenue in the 'northeastern portion of the City We Exhibit "1 "). General Plan land uses are: North - Siftgle Family Residential, City of Fontana, Hunter's Ridge Specific P`,an South - Flood Control East - Residential; Very Low (less than 2 dwelling units per acre); Etiwanda Specifi-- Plan; (a proposal to change the designation to.Neighborhood Commercial and Office is being discussed by the property owner) West - Flood Control III. BACKGROUND: This request h First City Properties is proposed to imp emen the settlement a)reement between the Citv of Fontana and the City of Rancho Cucamot a on annexation and develupmW: of the Hunt Club property. The development known as Hunter's 15 dge is located in the City of Fontana, north of tile City limits of Rancho look Cucamonga along Summit Avenue any; east of the San Sevaine Weh. The proposal is based on traffic and circulation studies completed for the Hunter's Ridge Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report. These studies indicate that at buildout, the project will generate more than 24,0 ©U vehicle trips per day. In o 'ar to handle the increased traffic, planned street designations for Cherry Avenue must be- increased. Therefore, the applicant is requesting that the existing designation for Cherry Avenue and for Summit Avenue be changed frat residential collector (66 foot right - of -way) to secondary arterial (88 foot right- rc -w4+). IV. ANALYSIS: Several issues need to be considered, including traffic, aesthetfic setting, timing of improvements, and maintenance of landscaping in the right -of -way. These issues are presented as follows: A. Traffic. staff supports the change in designation rom collector to secondary arterial in order to handle the Increased traffic which will be generated by the Hunter's Ridge project (see Exhibits IT -ind "3'). B. Aesthetic Setting- Cherry Avenue and Summit Avenue will be ea:; e'rn en- tr! s —into the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The applicant will improve the existing Summit Avenue in a manner consistent with City standards and consistent Wi the Etiwanda Specific Plan wit, 20 feet of landscaping on the north side of the roadway within the City of Fontana (see Exhibit "4 "). Cpl PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 88- 028 /ESPA 88 -01 - FIRST CITY PROPEP.TIES may 5, 1988 Page 2 Although the improvements to Cherry Avenue between existing Summit Avenue and the I -15 Freeway in,er" ange meet traffic considerations, they fain short of an aesthetic setting for Gateway entry to the City. The Etiwanda Specific Plan Identifies the intersection of Cherry Avenue and the I -15 Freeway as a City Gateway. Cherry Avenue and 24th Street are the travel paths for the gateway. Accordingly, VA Street is designated as a special parkway designed und�, the "unifying theme" of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. To be consistent �with the special treatment of Gateways and the unifying theme" of, the Etiwarda Specific Plan, Cherry Avenue should also be designated as a special street. Also, within the Hunter's Ridge project, Cherry Avenue will be developed to a 110 foot right -of -way including yandscaping and median divider (see Exhibit "5"). AM Therefore, in order to provide an appropriate setting for a 1p Gateway entrance to the City and to bt consistent with surrounding development, staff recommends that Cherry Avenue be treated as a Special Secondary Arterial with a 64 foot paved section, a 14 foot median, and 32 feet of landscaping with 5 foot sidewalk sections on both sides for a total 110 foot right -of -way designation (see Exhibit °611). C. Timing of Improvements: According to the Hunter's Ridge pec c alb an env ronmentd mitigation measures, Summit Avenue will be improved with Phase I construction of the project. Improvement of the City portion of Summit Avenue will be made by the developer with future reimbursement by the City. The Specific Plan and environmental mitigation measures also stated that for off -site improvements, Cherry Raenue should be improved to four lanes in accord with traffic demand. The project traffic engineer calculates that demand for four travel lanes on Cherry Avenue will occur when 1,100 residential units have been occupied. It is further sta +ed that upon completion of Cherry Avenue improvements, another 700 units may be occupied. The completion of Cherry Avenue improvements would' approximately correspond to buildout of Phase I at 1,654 units. However, the Fontana City Council, at staff's suggestion, did alter this mitigation measure from occupancy to building permit issuance and made a determination that mpintenance would be the applicant's responsibility. C_-�) /S PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 88- 02B /ESPA 88 -01 . FIRST CITY PROPERTIES May 25, 1988 Page 4 D. Maintenance of Landscaping .n the Rigg_ht af- Way: For improvemen s"�'!€&, � venue � within the city of Fontana, landscape maintenance will be provided by a landscape, lighting, and maintenance district. At this time, no provision for maintenance of landscaping for improvements within Rancho Cucamonga have been made. However, it is anticipated that the City and developer will reach an agreement ran landscape maintenance prior to issuance of permits for street Improvements. E. Amendment to the Trails FVVa_p. The proponent is proposing to re cca e a sect ono "the 3esigniited traii to the north side of Summit Avenue. this section would .;onnect with improvemnts to the regional trail, system which the proponents will construct within the City of Fontana aleng the San Sevaina wash an the west boundary of the project.. Accordingly, the s•iction of the trail east of San Sevaine Wash would be deleted. Staff has no objections to the relocation of the 'trail to the n7rth side 0 the right -of -way and deletion of the portion of tile-trail along Summit Avenue which will be re- routed thragh tie hunter's Ridge project. (see Exhibits "7" and "8 "). Y. ENVIRONMENTAL: In conjunction with the app?icatien, an Initial u re mrnary Environmental Assessment, in .cark(ormity with the requirements with the California Environmental Quality! Act, has been prepared and the proposal wolAd have no significant adverse. effect -n the environment. Therefore, the Planning Lopnission may make a finding of no significant impact on the environment and rece.mend certification of a Negative Declaration. VI. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends public hearing discussion of the propose eneral Plan and Etiwat;da Specific Plan Amendments. If the Planning Commission agrees that the right- of -gray for Cherry Avenue should be 110 feet, the item will need to be readvertised and brought back for public hearing at the June 22, 1588 meeting of the Commission. Re fully ' it7- B dB City ,anner BB:MB:te Attachments: Exhibit "1" = Location Map Exhibit 112" - S it A Exhibit "3" Exhibit ' "4" Exhibit "S" Exhibit "6" Exhibit "7" Exhibit "8n umm venue Existing and Proposed Sections Cherry Avenue Existing and Proposed Sections Summit Avenue Landscaping Sections Cherry Avenue Landscaping Sections Staff Recommended Cherry Avenue Concept E.S.P. Existing Community Trails Proposed Trail Plan e�2) /(O 6A � r r f / aNA6 N0191- vorhood d ; i Commwrcial Oiler Comm. JAFr..o aay got / �rw' r Road own Community Trail Lower Residential 0 natty C P4OrFe,Lmvq ,+a, f i Q Higher Foothill blvd. S.P. am+awy�r J'' • !� (A cfpi�y 4 0 R CL' s : SPA gs -42.Q moi ss -ot T[ LE: - LQr -AT«K MAD I f't.ANNI Dives( EXHIBU- 1 c�n� -cry cin�� _ Cauca IAPI I Igo, EXISTING CONDITIONS R1W Cq➢ ciW I Ci7Yd� 2d ,G ,eCeo4AMV GENERAL PLAN /ETIWArNDA SPECIFIC PLAN .Pa c� PROPOSED STREET SECTION SUMMIT AVENUE (24TH STREET) RANCHO CUC -kjNJCNGA TLE� �JAVIT p t P► � -os R-ANNlL\G EXVL$jGN EXHIBIT 2 LEI -mm X17. l� C EXISTING CONDITION EtIWANDA SPECIFIC [ALAN COLLECTOR 9 SEi1)7aN F lv -o f ot"IM: reNE . Cv Jam%r-Aw/ •m-M54W/5- 7c9Ald mo ,.V e,{,mvvs, TfeeC/GeslEs CHERRY AVENUE (SUMMIT AVENUE TO INTERSTATE 15) CITY OF ITENI -fo T[Tf.,E: CNER�Y i�V��ti irr PANNING DIVISKj EXHIBIT .3 SC'ALE� ROVE_ . FUTURE PARK W/ 4' WIDE SUMMIT AVEMUE HUMTER'S R1DGR OMSITE SECTION.' CITY OF STEM:— [�-',A R8 -tJ2B Ddb ONrGA PLAt1INING DfVLSC+C [ ' EXHIBIT. -4 SCALE- _ALE; UODMIE r aw oemvm 7fm TO BE scamm N WALL $WE LANE Rt STREE( TYPICAL 130TH SwE9 OF t 1 E' MEANAERWR J04airla [ PATH i wALKwAY COMMUNITY THEME WALL, KI 3 CNERR Y AVENUE �"4TW.is P-IDGE ONSITE SEerioia CITY OF PLANNING DIVS)N EXHIBIT. SCALE. eZ�l PROPOSE% C14LFF.Y AVEMUE COAICEPT FROM SUMMIT AVENUE TO 1 -15 SiAr"F RECOMMEMDATIO CITY CF RANCHO CLrA- j ` A RANW-C DIVM r �� 11 EFII ` G LEA 11 ITENV OPA 89-139$ tin v$-.,t TITLE: PWA SEM CuERRY Aur t:C3AlCE�T EXHiBIT- & _ SCALE. - -NQNE_ _ L ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAM EXISTING COMMt MITY MM LS CITY OF III iR•iA.t'V'C CUCkjM BANNING D(VM)N e7Q3 so`- ---. 1000 g1� 1AUNIM <' ill SCE E_ PROTECT AREA G .NMH ITER1. GPA 88— TITHE: EXIST1NG f^OA,puBE.INiTY AILS EXHIBIT. 7 SCALE Molar AREA I INtlNTER\ !I/IOGE' TO W.QTH SICc �ttDGE OF .SIIMN:? l T AVE I E?VZO CT , I ,i DELETE - l l TU)L A �UU10 VE. ! � "°"'� ° �+ SECTIOU ARK ll- Neighborhood �t ' CommorWai PA Other 3 Lim Comm. JFrseway ca or Roast Community Trail ✓�'� " ?� :. •'/ � ' � lower __ �+ c� syg: Re lal • �•� Densigy Uty L It FOOTlelt el vl7� �,, � . Higher] Foothill bird: S.P. ARROW �nv_r II- Z T �� IORW CITY OF � _ ITEM -, GFA 88-G28 DDA � -DI RAC CH } CLCA PLANNING D(VlSO % A TITLE: PRDPOSED TRAIL pLAt EXHIBIT' }3 ALE - C• DEVELOPMENT REVIE4i AT -54 - r —_ _ »HIU - The dc'Odpment of a restaurant totaling 7,174 quara feet on 1.2 acres and in the industrial Park District, Suyarea 7, located �by theast corner of Red Oak Street and Laurel Street - APN: 20 Motion: Moved by Chitiea, sec ad kesley, unanimously carried, to adopt the Consent Calendar. PUBLIC HEARINGS 0. FNVTRnNMFNrei rnvrcrtllW ".....—..�-1 w-uto rMil CITY - n amendment to ti; :e Circu ation E ement of the General P an to widen Cherry Avenue from Summit Avenue (24th Street) to Interstate 15 from a collector to a secondary arterial with an 88' rig`it- of -way road section and amend Summit Avenue to an 88' right -of -way road section. (2) Amend the Master Plan of Trails o?' the General Plan to relocate the trail on the south side of Summit Av nue to the north of Summit Avenue alona the easterly City boundary. E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENUMFN FIRST CITY P.OPERTIES - _ T 88 -OI - Mn widen Cherry Avenue from Summit Avenue (24th Street) ato* lr e�rstate 15 ANNE from a collector to a secondary arterial with an 88' right -of -way road section and amend Summit Avenue to an 88'right -,If -way road section. Amend the Community Trails Map >�f the Etiwanda Specific Plan to relocate the trait on the south side of Summit Avenue to the north of Summit Avenue along the easterly City boundary. Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Flanner, gave a brief overview of the amendments. Staff recommended that the Planning Commission continue the public hearing 'co .tune 22, 1388. This would ailow time to "readvertise the items with an amendment to widen the right -of� -way for Cherry Avenue to 110 feet. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing;. Doug Lyon, 12477 Ironbark, Rancho Cucamonga, asked the reasoning for widening Summit Avenue. William Silva, Deputy City Engineer, explained that Summit would be widened Io i its ultimate right -of -way width to bring it into consistency with the Etiwan(,a Specific Plan. Further, uhe widening would enabie the street to handle the projected traffic load, f Mr. Lyon indicated that this was his first exposure to tie amendments and he had several questions. Chairman McNiel suggested that Mr. Lyon meet with City staff prior to the June 22nd Planning Commission meeting when the items would be heard in depth. j Planning Commission Minutes 1 s { _2_ E May 25, 1988 �' Planning Commission Minutes -3. :;lay 25, 1988 There were no further public comments. Commissioner Tolstoy propo.ed that as part of this amendment the Planning the from its current termination point at ` Commission consider extensiog median 24th Street and the Loop Road intersection. He suggested that the median be extended across 24th Street to Cherry Avenue and that a median also be Road.. He noted that there may be constraints; provided on the Lower Loop - howE %ir, suggested that the Commission direct staff to explore the median possibilities. The Commission concurred with this direction. Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by Blakesley, unanimously carried, to General Ylan Amendment 88 -OZB and continue Environmental Assessment ana Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 88 -01 to the Planning Commission meeting of June 22, 1988. F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -02A - ACACIA CONSTRUCTION - request ;o amend the Land Use Element of the Gener Pla from Medii�r:Vtesidential to Low - Medium Residential on approximav' of LEr_ori 42.26 aes �r lan , located north of Highland avenue, south g Channel - APN: 207- 271 -34 Avenue extension, a west of Deer Creek (portion), 41 (portion and 42. G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT\, AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 88 -01 - ACACIA CONSTRUCTION �Aequest to amend the Development District Designation of t+l "' Residential to. Low - Medium Residential on approximately 42.26 1.- .ated at the north side of Highland Avenue, of Deer Creek Channel - APN: south of Lemon Avei, ?1 ,�6r and .pest 201- �71 -?4 (portion), ;r.tiorO, and 42. Dino Putr nc,, Assistant planner, presentee, the staff report. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Gary Andreason, 450 Mariposa, Upland, Califoi'gia, gave an overview of the Conditions of project. Mr. Andreason concarred with the solution and Approval. There were no flerther comments, therefore the publicearing was c,Gsed. Commissioner Chitiea commented that it was nice to\see a request, for a decrease in density come before to Commission. I Planning Commission Minutes -3. :;lay 25, 1988 1{ TRAILS ADVISORY CMPT1EE Comw S. dune :is. 79 Project Oescr", 4 ETILfANDA SPLul"FiC PLAN ME ENT 88 -01 - FIRST .Ci�TY 'PROPE�riCS r�,;.es 1 ary n 0wenca p� ec o an F� �oo:i��.� `i e� unity Trait from of south side to the nmwtit zide of 24th Street �,�: the eastern end 9f the City, - ?ssuep- 1. The Etiwanda Speciffc p5a:n currently shows a CodMunity Trail on the south s1de of 24,jv Street. The present Alignment of the Cmwnity Trail Was shifted from the north sida> tG tha south side of 24th Street through a ,preijou9; stsJw tt ensure that a Cnty Trail wcuid be provided( along 24th Strt thet would be rev #ado approved, ant raain�tainad by u the Caty: Actien: �e The Comittee felt that the trail c,aufd be rellocated to the n of 24th Street. providing the follcNing could be made. orth side 1. The crossing of 24th Street should occur on the west-s3do of San Seyaine Wash at a controlled intersection Ctour way tt©g or gr:�7 ized) . 2. The trail should extend Co Cherry Avenue to serve the vVV ,Oned Property et the southeast corner of C,°!erry and 24th RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLAN GENERAL PLAN �AEKDMENT 88 -026 REQUESTING TO AMEND THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN TO WIDEN CHERRY AVENUE FRO" 24TH STREET (SUMMIT AVENUE) TO INTERSTATE 15 FROM A COLLECTOR STREET TO A SECONDARY ARTERIAL (EXHIBIT 1); AND TO D €SIGNATE THE A80V€ SECTIOR OF CHERRY AVENUE, 24TH STREET, EAST OF THE LOOP ROAD, AND LOWER LOOP ROAD AS SPECIAL DESIGN STREETS. A. Recitals. (i) First City Propert?es has filed an application for Genaratl Plan Amendment No. E8 -029 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application. ". : M) On the ?end �j' June, 1988 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed Vublic nearing on the application. .1 iii All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occur. -ad. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancbo Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Comasissioi hereby specif; ally finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part d, of this Resolution are true and corre4t. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this CoarA scion R during the above- referencad meeting on June 22, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, this Coi=ission hereby specifically finds as follows; (a) An increase in circulation will occur as a result of development of the Hunter's Ridge project in the City of Fontana. Therefore, public safety requirements necessitate tfi widening of the described portion of Cherry Avenue from collector street to a secondary arterial. F€.thermore, the described section of Cherry Avenue, as well as 24th Street, east of the hoop Road (Summit Avenue) and loner Loop Read, serve as entryways into the City, and therefore, need special' design treatmtent under, the Special Design Street designation. (b) These steeets are located adjacent to presently undeveloped land and flood control facilities in the northeast corner of the City. FORNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -426 GENERAL PLAN June 22, 1988 Page 2 (c) This amendment does not conflict with the Circulation Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development in a manner consistent with the General Plan, and with related development; and (d) This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrf* ntal to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties and a Negative Declaration should be issued. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above= t�dfcrenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) Tho amendment does not conflict with the Circulation policies of the General Platt;. and (b) The amendment promotes the goals of the Circulation Ele %nt of the General Plan; and (c) The amendiaazt would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered for compliance with the California ERvironmental Quality Act of 1910 and that a Negative Declaration should be issued, S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this commission hereby resolver that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby rerimmends approval on the 22nd day of June, 1988, of General Plan Amendment 88,J0. 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption if this Resolution, APPROVED AND fiD IED "THIS 22iiD DAY OF JUNE, 1986 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 8Y arry T. MtNiel , Chairman -- ATTEST: Brad guller, Depufy Secretary 1`� PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTIN NO. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -028 = GENERAL PLAN June 22, 1988 Page 3 f I, Bfat ,Buller, Deputy Sec, etar�, of., the P ahning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby,.,'4ertify 0 4a the foregoing Resolution iias duly and regularly introduced, passed, and -i,, pted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a reguldr meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22 day of June, 1988, by the following vote -.tg- wit: I AYES: COMMISSIONEES: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ARSE 0: CWkISSIOPERS: f r I� I 1 — CZ-30 a RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLb "ON OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 89 -01 TO WIDEN CHERRY AVENUE FROM 24TH STREET (SUMMIT AVENUE) TO INTERSTATE 15 FROM A COLLECTOR STREET TO A SECONDARY ARTERIAL AND TO DESIGNATE AS SPECIAL DESIGN STREETS THE ABOVE PORTION OF CHERRY AVENUE, AS WELL AS 24TH STREET, EAST OF THE LOOP ROAD, AND LOWER LOOP ROAD (EXHIBITS 1 AND 2) AND TO AMEND THE TRAILS MAP TO RELOCATE A PORTION TO THE NORTH SIDE OF 24TH STREET (SUMMIT AVENUE) AND TO DELETE A PORTION ALONG 24TH STREET <BEGINNING 200 YARDS WEST -OF CHERRY AVENUE TO THE EASTERN BOUNDARY u" THE CITY (EXHIBIT 3). A. Recitals. (i) First City. Properties has filed an application for Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment No. 88 -01 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On the 22nd of June, 1988 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing en the application. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Ba „ad !,non substantial evidence presented to this Commission- during the above - referenced meeting on June 22, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) An increase in circulation will occur as a result of development of the Hunter's Ridge project in the City of Fontana. Therefore, public safety requirements necessitate the widening of the described portion of Cherry Avenue from collector street to a secondary arterial. Fathermore, the described section of Cherry Avenue, as well as 24th Street, east of the Loop Road (Summit Avenue) and lower Loop Road, serve as entryways into the City, and therefore, need special design treatm2�t under the Special Design Street designation. CD3i PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. GENERAL PLAN AMDNEMENT 88 -01 ETIWANDA SPFCIFIC PLAN June 22, °P Page 2 (b) These streets are located adjacent to presently undeveloped land and fiood control facilities in the northeast corner of the City. (c) This amendment does not conflict with the Circulation Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and (d) This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. (e) This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment :nor the surrounding properties and that a Negative Declaration be issued. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 abov; this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) The amendment does not conflict with the Circulation mk policies of the Etiwanda Specific: Plan and (b) ,ne amendment promotes the goals of the Circulation Element of the Etiw;t;tda Specific Plan; and (c$ The amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. 4, This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered for compliance witn the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and recommends adoptionof a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this commission htrreby resolves that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga he *by recommends approval on the 22nd day of June, 1988, Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 88 -01. 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall Wertify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22NND DAY OF 09E, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY' Larry T. McNiel, COairman I ATTEST: ra u er, epu y acre ary 't PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTIONt NO. GENERAL PLAN .AMONEMERT 88 -0I - ETIWPJIDA ; PECIFIC PLAN June 22, 1985 Page 3 I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Co=ission Of the City of Rancho Cuca onga, do hereby certify that, the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly % atroduced, passed, and adopted 6v the Planning Commi;;sios� of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of June, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMISSIONERS1. NOES: COMISSIONERSn ABSENT: COMMISSIONERSt— f i tr CGS �:3 E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 13, 1988 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, Cizy Planner BY: Otto Kroutil, Veputy City Planner SUBJECT: ENTERTAINMENT PEIL411 87 -01 HARRY C`S - A consideration o modify, suspen or revoke 7W7 ` eu ortainment permit granted for a disc &key doing vocals, act, play, show, dance contest, bind, be3)uty contest in conjunction with a restaurant /nightclub, ccated at 10877 Foothill Boulevard. 1. ABSTRACT: This Entertainment Permit has been referred W the anFT` ning Commission from the Atblic Safety Commission to consider Possible modification, Suspension or revocation of the permit. In addition, the applicant has applied for an expansion of the entertainment use. The Commission is requested to review: (1) 'The.Public Safety Commission recommendations, and (2) The applicant's request for an Expansion of the use. II. BACKGROUND: The Entertainment Permit was condty anaily approved in uns o 87 for a "disc jockey doing vocals and playing records nightly from 8 :00 P.M. till 2 :00 a.m." The conditions of approval required that an expansion of the dance floor, increase in intensity, or other change in entertainment be reviewed and approved by the Commission as a modification of this permit. The conditions also require that a "duly licens?d and uniformed security guard" be provided as require_a -h�y the Entertainment Ordinance No. 290. - i During the past six months, many problems and disturbances have occurred at Harry v's Restaurant, including violations of the terms of the Entertainment Permit. The attached reports (Exhibit 'V) fully describe those c:ty, law enforcement, and fire safety problems and violations which have been documented at the restaurant,, and which are listed below: Disturbances /intoxicated persons (15 occurrences) * Thefts in parking lot (5 occurrences) Narcotic arrests (5 occurrences) ITEEN C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 87 -01 - HARRY C'S July 13, 1988 Page 2 E * Traffic collisions it occurrence) Stabbing (1 occurrence) Shooting (1 occurrence) Felonious assault U occurrence) ,r Blocked fire exit violation (numerous occurrences) ,E Excessive occupancy (numerous occurrences) �a Excessive vehicles in parting areas (numerous occurrences) Unreported fires Delinquent admission's tax payments Lack of maintenance of landscaping Male exotic dancing show III. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION FIND,MGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: On June 7, 1988, the Public SatetY Commission rev ewe a many problems and distl-trLva wrs which have occurred at Harry G's Restaurant within the past six months. Representatives of the Fire District, Sheri P s office and several City Departments testified about the various problems. After much discussion, the Public Safety Connission made a number of findings and reco&, ndations to the Planning Commission. These are summarized below. (A detailed memorandum from the Public Safety Commission, dated July 16, outlining in detail these findings, conclusions and recommendations, is attached as Exhibit "A "). FINDINGS: I. The permittee has been the subject of persistent and repeated fire code violations which endanger the public welfare. 2. The permittre has been personally and repeatedly advised of fire code requirements and violations. 3. The pernittee has willfully and repeatedly allowed excessive and prohibited number of patrons within the entertainment area (bar /disco) creating a public safety crowd control and fire safety hazard. 4. An excessive and disproportionate amount of police time, manpower and resources have been expended to police patrons at the permittee's facility and to respond to calls for service. S. The permittee's plainclothes "security" guards are grossly inadequate and inappropriate for both the nature of the permittee's business and the excessive amount of people attracted to the facility, both inside and outside the premises. �— PLANNING fVMMISSION STAFF REPORT ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 87 -01 - HARRY C'S July 13, 1588 Amlk Page 3 6. The above natters have been brought to the attention of the permittee by the police and fire service on numerous ocrassions, and a satisfactory level of cooperation has not been achieved. The Public Safety Commission: concluded that the permittee is operating in violation of fire ordinances and the conditions of his entertainment permit. The Public Safety Commission also concluded that action by the Planning Corramission to modify, suspend or revoke the permittee's entertainment permit is needed. RECOMMENDATIONS: The Public Safety Commission recommends that the Planning Comnisoion take action to impose the following conditions on permittee's entertainmen., permit: 1. A minimum of two uniformed, duly licensed and regularly epp T oeyff—security guars rons a reputable securf_ir – be required to be on the premises from sunset un 1–'Wo -ours after the cessation of any entertainment. At least one of said guards to be and remain on duty in the par ng an outside adjacent areas of the facility. 2. The hours and scope of entertainment permitted be restricted to reduce the number of patrons who loiter after hours in parking and outside areas of the facility. 3. Such further conditions as the fire and police specifically request to eliminate, minimize or mitigate the public slaty problems associated with the providing of entertainment by the licensee. 4. It is further recommended that the Planning Commission not grant additional gr,ce time or delay the licensee fcr the purposes of code can.rriance with fire regulations and other public safety requirements, and that the continued failure to maintain the minimum public safety requirements of the licensee's entertainment permit result in the Permanent revocation thereof. Ill. APPLICANT'S REQUEST FOR EXPANSION OF USE: Section 5.12.110 of the Municipal C o e requ res the p!;rm"i't9F-E5— annually reapply for an entertainment permit on or before January 1st of each and every year. On June 24, 1988, Mr. Chan reapplied for an entertainment permit for Harry C's Restaurant which included expansion of the nature of entertainment. According to the application (Exhibit "E "), the following uses are requested in addition to the existing permitted disc jockey: "act, play, show, dance contest, band, beauty contest ". Further, the application requests permission to conduct any other types 2537 PLANNING COMISSION STAFF RE79RT ENTERTAIMMNT PERNIT 87 -01 - HARRY C'S July 13, 1988 Page 4 of entertainment which are not named "because of the wide variety of our promotions and the fact that many of them are tied in with local or national sponsors and change from week to creek, it is hard to designate a set schedule for them." Y. ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATIM At issue before the Planning Commission are two basic questions: I. Have the problems identified by the Public Safety Commission been addressed scessfally by the applicant? 2. On the basis of the above, should the Entertainment Permit be revoked, suspended, modified with additional conditions, or expanded in scope as requested by the applicant? Over the past month since the Public Safety Coxnisztiop. action, staff has been aware of the following Police Protection: The Sheriff's office indicates that P.srry G's now has uniformed security guards patrolling the parking lot, which apparently helped In reducing the number of calls for service. Three calls hava been logged in since June 7 (see Exhibit "B "). Fire Protection,. The =ire DisVir —t informed us there are still serious problez occl, - -4 ing at tPe site,. On June 30 another citation was issued for repeated blockage of an exit (see exhibit "Cu). Landscape and maintenance problems: Plaiining staff has met with the owner to discuss improvements needed. Since our meeting, the following improvements have been made: o All dead trees have been replaced o 80 additional flats of ground cover have been installed (180 flats since April) o 94 agapanthus have been added for color o 50 sacks of plant mix have been mixed in with the soil o Irrigation has been improved and now appears to work Some additional work will be needed, but overall a signific ht improvement has occurred (see Exhibit 'D11). PLAN ►LING CaIMISSION STAFF REPORT ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 87 -01 - HARRY C'S July 13, 1988 Page 5 Entertainment Permit violations: Activ; ties include dance shows, contests, and similar events involving a number of individuals. Existing permit provides for a single D.J. Admission tax delinquency: There is currently no delinquency; past feks and penalties have been paid. Fire District and Sheriff's staff will be avdilable to provide additional information at the meeting. VI. OPTIONS: The following options maybe considered by the Planning oisston: A. Modification The Planning Commission may modify the en er a nnmen `permit to impose such reasonable conditions as to the use or extent of such permit as it deems appropriate to deal with the violations and problems regarding the operation of the permitted business (entertainment) activity. B. ,,pension: The Planning Commissior; may temporarily suspend EFe— entertainment permit pending compliance. The Commission should specify a time period for the suspension. The Comm4sion may suspend or revoke an Entertainment Permit subject to )$termination that the applicant: 1. Made any false, misleading or fraudulent statements in their application; or 2. Violated any provision of the Entertaimmat Ordinance No. 290 or any other regulation or condition relating to his permitted activity; or 3. Is convicted of a felony, or any crime involving moral turpitude; or 4. Violated any regulations or conditions adopted by the Planning Commission or City Ct)uncix., relating tc permittee's business or permit; or 5. Conducted business in a manner contrary to the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the public; or AL 6. Demonstrated that he is unfit to be trusted with 1 privileges grantkd by such permit. PLANNING Cc-MISSION STAFF REPORT ENTERTAIMENT PERMIT 87 -01 - MARRY C'S July 13, 1988 Page 6 C. Revocation: The Planning Commission mV. revoke the en er a nm:enrpermit subject to the samta. findings necessary far suspension. Tyre Commission should specify in their revocation action, a minimum time period to recousider any new application for an entertainment permit. VII. STAFF RECOKMENiDAT1014: The Commission should conduct a public wring an cone additional comments. If the Fire District concerns can be resolved, it is recommended that the Commission modify the Entertai.nmmer:t Permit ,to include all of the conditions reco:menaed by the Publf� Safety Commission. Staff cannot SupPart the requested expansion of the scope of the permit to include unspecified ot;ar a ^tiriFies. Further, it is Suggested that the permit be limited to z P—Viod of 120 days, and that the Commission reti this period. eW the permit at tna end of Finally, the conditions of approve, should note tiaat Violations of any public safety provisions will �,esult in consideration of Immediate revocation of the entertainment Permit. Staff will need direction to prepare the appropriate Resolutions. Re - ec full u . {Ii Bra er City fi nner 88 :OK *.ml g Attachment: Eyhib'. "A, N ,-ono f a Exhibit , "am Exhibit "C" Exhibit "o" Exhibit "E" Exhibit "F" Exhibit "G" Exhibit "H" Exhibit "J*° Exhibit 1111 Exhibit "1" cc: Public Safety commissi tn:�n rC- .0 11 Safety Commission Status memo from Sheriff's Status ''Memo from Fire District .. Status memo on landscaping New APPIication Plans June 2 public Safnty Commission report with attachments m Efttertain Ordinance Admissions Tax Ordinance - 9esolution of Approval (June 1987) Original Permit Application (1987) on 12 M"', K] 4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM V DATE: June 16, 1988 TO: Planning Commission, FROM: Public Safety Commission�tdS SUBJECT: }TARRY C'S RESTAURANT ENTERTAINNENI' PERMIT At the request of the Mayor, the City staff presented to the Public Safety Commissi,:a reports of law enforcement, fire safety and related public safety problems that have plagued Harry C's since its opening. On June 7, a hearing was conducted on this matter. A copy of the staff reports presented to us on that date are attached. The Commission learned of the following areas of concern: 1. Excessive law enforcement resources that are b %ing expended to police the establishment, Pairticularly in connection with the providing of entertainment. 2. Repeated fire code violations and fi:ilure to comply with public safety ,provisions relating to crowd control. 3. The licensee's expansion of the scope of entertainment beyond that approved in their permit, without the consent or approval of the Planning Goa�mission I or Planning staff. ! Q 4. The habitual failure to pay city admission taxes in a timely manner. 5. The failure to comply with landscaping requirements of the Planning ' Division, I I -, The Commission, after review of the staff reports, response by the licensee, his attorney and landlord, and after discussion, unanimously adopted by motion the following fi;idings: E f Harry C's Restaurant - Er:Zertainment Permit June 16, 1988 Page 2 rigoarlfs,of FACT 1. The licensee has been the subject of persistent and repeatedt fire code violations which endanger the public welfare. Specifically, the repeated blocking of hallways and exits, excessive occupancy beyond capacity limits, inoperative fire sprinkler gauge equipment, and failure to report a fire that occurred during business hours. 2. The licensne has personally been previously and repeatedly advised of fire code requirements and violations. 3. The licensee has wilfully and epeatedly allowed an excessive and prohibit( number of patrons.: n the entertainment area (bar,/disco), creating a public safety crown ttrol and firR safety hazard. 4._ An excessive. and disproportionate amount of police time, manpower and resources have i -�n expen14d to police patrons at the licensee's facility and to respond to calls for service. This drain on resources is above and beyond that normally expected in such an establishment. and has resulted in patrni deputies having to leave their assigned: beats in the City, thus leaving servica levels in those areas with an unacceptable level of protection in order to adequately deal with law enforcement problems at the licensee's establishment. S. The Licensee's plainclothes =security" guards are grossly inadequate and inappropriate for W,y the nature of the licensee's business and the excessive amount of people attracted to the 'facility, both inside: and outside the premises. 5. The above matters have been brought to the attention, of the licensee by the police and fire service an numerous occasions, and a s4 `sfaetory level of cooperation and compliance has not ba achieved. CONCLUSIONS The Public Safety Commission concludes that action by the Planning Commission to modify, suspend or revoke the licensee's entertainment permit is .needed inasmuch as the permitted business activity is being conducted in a manner contrary to the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the public. And, further, that the licensee is operating a permitted activity in violation of fire ordinances and the conditions of his entertainment permit. III. RECOt KNOATIONS It is therefore recommended that tho Planning Commission take action to impose the following conditions on licensee's entertainment permit; r Harry C's Restaurant Entertainment Permit June 15, 1988 Page 3 1. A minimum of two uniformed- duly licensed and re Marl, employed security guar's' -rom.a reputa fib a security firm be requirea to be on the premises from sunset until two 'ours a tar t e cessation of any entertainment. At least one of said guards to be and remain on duty in the parking and outside adjacent areas of the facility. 2. The hours and -_tope of entertainment pemitted be restricted to reduce the number of patrons who loiter after hours In parking and outside areas of < the facility. 3. Such further conditions as the fire and police specifically request to eliminate, mipimi.te or mitigate the public safety problems associated with the providing of sntertainmont by the It Mnsee. 4. it is further, recommended that the Planning Commission not grant additional grace time or delay the licensee for the purposes of cone coflolance with fire f egulations and other public safety requirements, and ,,chat the continued failure to maintain the minimum public safety requirements of the licensee's entertainment permit result in the permanent revoOtion thereof. i CAS /d,j a Enclosed l I l I CITY OR RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE- July 6 1988 FROM._.,. R. Peppler, Lieutenant Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Station TO: Planning Commission Cit' :of Rancho Cucamonga SUBJECT: HARRY C'S I On June 7, 1988, Harry Chan of Harry C*q,, located at 10817 Foothill Blvd., Rancho Cucamonga, appeared before the Public Safety Commission to answer questions and respond to reports presented by the Fire District, Planning Department and Sheriff's Depai^kment. Since that meeting Mr. Chan has met with Lieutenant Zeiner and I on two separate occasions. The first meeting was an inquiry as to what he could- do to assist the Sheriff's_ Department in keeping down the number of disturbances at hisJusiness. I suggestion was made to have uniformed security guards in the parking lot. Mr. Chan adopted that suggestion, and since the meeting of June 7, 1988, three calls for service have been logged at Harry C's. These calls consisted of one fight, a medical aid situation and a disturbance. During the second meeting with Mr. Chan, a review of the past month's activity was discussed. Emphasis, was placed on keeping the uniformed security guards on dut- :at Harry C's because it appeared that this has helped reduce the number of incidents at Harry C's and the number of calk—for service. Mr. Chats appeared receptive to keeping the uniformed security In place and to continue meeting with Lieutenant Zelner and �I.. R .1ac E10 1 I _ Foothill Ill. PROTECTION DISTRICT P. D. SO'?, 35 . ,6623 AMETHYST ST. • RANCHO CUCAMONGA 91705 1714) 487 -2535 July 8, 1988 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission 1 P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Harry CS Gentlemen: Following is a synopsis If code enforcement activities since June 7, 1988: 6-22 -88 Manager's meeting conducted at Hairy Chan's request (notes attached) 6 -29 Luncheon, inspection (complaint attached) 6 -30 Afternoon inspection P (complaint attached) 7 -1 Evening inspection No violations 7 -1 Phone call from Harzy t. (File notes attached) 7 -3 Weekend day inspection No violatio`As 7 -5 Received requeFt from Mr. Chan for "Location termit" It should be noted that the inspections were not conducted at times when overcrowdip,g is most likely, (July 4th holiday); however, inspections will be a<compliuded at "peak d3mand" prior to the Planning Commission's July 13th meeting. The results of these inspections will be available during the melting. Planning Commission July 8, 1988 Page Two r-4:C0MMENDATI01JS .Although Mr. &tan appears to be :making (an effort to Comply with Our minimum fife safety regliire9ments, his managers have had difficulty in carrying out his 'direction as witnessed by the 6-29, and 6.30 inspection (two different managers). I am reluctant to gave an "all's well on liar: >y C's. I would like Harry C's to be enjoyable for Rancho Cucamongans and profitable for Rarry and his employees, but not at the expense of basic Life safety. In order to determine if Mr. Chan's newly exhibited commitment is a lasting one or merely a rule to placate the concerns of several agencieis, a; longer evaluation period is necessary without incroasing the 'risk to his 'customers. Therefu_r, I would recommend granting no additional license to conduct any activities which ma,y increase the demand on the manager's attention to basic life safety responsibilities. further recommend a re-evaluation of 'Mr. Chan's commitment to the safety of his customers. The license "freeze" should ],ast a minimum of 120 days with recoctsideration of license occu;.ting at the end of the 120 day period. rely, "Ralp E. Crane Acting Eire Marshal REC /rb attachments (t.; i HAPERW C • S MANAGER T S LtiIE: E'T =NG THOSE PRESENT: RALPH CRANE AND SUSAN WOLFE, FOOTHILL FIRE pISTRICT HARRY CHAN, MANNY FLORES AND WILLY HON,, MWAGERS ROBERT, HEAD D.J. AND EMILY, OTHER D.:l, 1. A DRINK TABLE IS OK BEHIND THE HOSTESS STSTION IN THE LOBBY. 2. IT IS NOT OK TO BLOCK EXIT DOORS WITH DRINK TABLES. 3. HARRY SUGGESTED A FIRE ALARM TEST DURING THE HOURS THE PUBLIC IS PRESENT'. WE SUGGESTED HE CONTACT HIS ATTORNEY FOR LIABILITY AnVICE BEFORE DOING THIS. 4. HARRY CAUTIONED STAFF ToP FOLLOW THE SEATIlr PLAN ON THE WALL AT I�TIGHTS.. HE ALSO TOLD THE STAFF TO BE MINI,?URL OF THE PLACEMENT OF TAB12S AND CHAIRS IN EXIT PATHS. 5. ANYTIME A FIRE ALARM GOES OFF, IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE D.J. TO A( .TV,, THE EVACUATION ANNOUNCEMENT SYSTEM. 6. MANAGERS WILT- Rr,, CITED FOR BLOCKED EXITS AND OVERCROWDING. 7. OCCUPANT LOAD WITH MORE THAN 75 SEATS = 209 NOT MORE THAN 75 SEATS = 364 MAXIMUM CAPACITY NO FURNITURE = 439 8. AT 8;30 PM ALL OCCUPANT LOAD COUNTS ARE FROZEN TO ESTABLISH NUMBERS OF PERSONS PRESENT. 9. 'L1RRY SUGGESTED TO HAVE THE CASHIER FIGURE AND RECORD THE OCCUPANT LOAD EVERY 30 M7.NUTEB. 10. HARRY DIRECTED STAFF TO ALLOW A COUNT OF 10 PEOPLE FOR STAFF AND MIS- COUNTING. HE WANTS STAFF TO STOP THE COUNT AT 340 TO ALLOW A MARGIN OF SAFETY. 11. THE HIGHEST RANKING MANAGER OR OWNER PRESENT WILL BE THE ONE CITED IF WE FIND THE FIRE EXITS BLOCKED OR THE HP.XIMUM CAPACITY EXCEEDED. 12. NO ATTACHMENTS ARE ALLOWED ON THE FSRL SPRINKLER HEADSz.. EXIT SIGNS OR FIRE EXTINGUISaRS. THE DECORATING COMMITTEE WAS ADVISED. E ?3 r'' i l FOO'£H =LL FxnR Dxsl nmc2 r COMPI ,AT,N`r DATE OF COMPLAINT: JUNE 30, 1988 VIOLATION: UNIFORM FIRE CODE, 1985 EDITION, SECTION 3.101 "UNLAWFUL CONTINUANCE OF FIRE HAZARD" LOCATION OF VIOLATION: HARRY C'S RESTAURANT, 10877 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, R.C. PERSON CITED: WILLY NMN HON 896 HAWTHORN' POMONA, CA CALIFORNIA DRIVER'S LICENSE # NOT AVAILABLE NO LICENSE IN POSSESSION ORIENTAL MALE ADULT, BLACK /BROWN, 515 ". 130 LBS VICTIM: PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA WITNESS: SUSAN D. WOLFE FOOTHILL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 6623 AMETHYST STREET RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91701 COMPLAINT: ON JUNE 29, 1988; AT APPROXIMATELY 1:15 PH, THE UNDERSIGNED, ACCOMPATIM BY FIRE PREVENTION SPECIALIST KIM AGUAYO, OBSERVED A DRINK TABLE BLOCKING THE EXIT DOORS AT 771E LOBBY HOSTESS STATION IN HARRY C'S RESTAURANT. WE ALSO OBSERVED A ROW OF DINING TABLES PLA LL CED UP TO THE EDGE OF THE DOUBLE EXIT DOORS IN THE SOUTH WA OF THE DISCO /BAR AREA. A PERSON Wf,S SITTING AT THE END OF THIS ROW OF TABLES. HIS CHAIR WAS PROTRUDING WELL ACROSS THE EXIT DOOR OPENING. HE APPEARED TO BE THE GUEST OF HONOR AT A PRIVATE PARTY. HIS CHAIR WAS PULLED BACK TO THE CENTER Q:; --a, EXIT DOOR DOOR AREA BY THE ENTERTAINER, DURING OUR OBSERVATION. THE RESTAURANT WAS OPEN FOR BUSINESS. BOTH THE ABOVENOTED EXITS ARE REQUIRED FIRE EXITS FROM THE DISCO /BAR AREA DUE TO THE LARGE OCCUPANT LOAD. A CITATION WAS NOT ISSUED. THE MANAGER, MANNY FLORES, WAS DIRECTED TO IMMEDIATELY REMOVE THE TABLE BY THE HOSTESS STATION. WHILE THIS WAS BEING DONE, THE PARTY BROKE UP IN THE DISCO /BAR AREA. ALL THE PEOPLE LEFT AND MANAGEMENT WAS DIRECTED TO GET THE TABLES AND CHAIRS OUT OF THE WAY OF THE EXIT DOORS, WHICH THEY DID. AN INSPECTION OF ALL THE OTHER REQUIRED FIRE EXITS WAS iCiNDUCTED. NO OTHER REQUIRED FIRE EXITS WERE OBSERVED TO BE BLOCKED. E N O D 13 El ON JUNE 30, 1988, AT APPROX DISTRICT tTTORtNEY ROBERT rU7vrm T LY 3;30 PM, THE UNDERSIGNED R M j O FOR LEGAL ADVICE ON ISSUING A CITATION DE RL.<CrKD FIRE EXITS O85ERVED THE' PR TRAY. AT APPROXIMATELY 4;q0 PM I ENTERED HARRY HARRk C CITATION IFOR c BLOCKM p,$ 5' RESTAURANT ' OB.,ER YESTERilAY> THE INTENT TO ISSUE 'ITS VKIi A DRINK TABLE AGAIN BLOCKIi4G T LATELY UPON ENTERING LOBBY HOSTESS STATION. ALL TIM OTHER OEgUIRED FIRE EATS IRE EXIT DOORS WERE OBSERVM TO BE BLOCKED. WE iNT DOORRS A NONE IM MANAGER, W;CLLY , NAME or FRANK I BON, WAS uN n"Y', ALONG WITH A NEW HWAGER XXIT T ICATIOi': -M WWAASI INNFO 9Z A CITATION WOULD BE ISSUER FOR 1�iAPROD BY IS CHARGE AND �� Hii$ TO PRODUCE �g EXIT TODAY. HE WAS ADVISED OF r THE BLOCKED FIRE TOLD THEY WVX ALSO CITABLE, BUTT 0 nO BLOCKED FIRE EXITS FROM I BLOCKED AND. TODAY, HE Fit!D TFi3 ?APLE, REMOVED .F.EtOM THk. NOT E MT. LUD�t ON THE ViTATION ISSUED I ASKED FOR MR. HON'S DRIVER'S OFFFICE, TAKING LICENSE Ate} HE EXrUSFj) FktM WIT$ MM. BIMSETU TO Go TO THE RETURN. IfAW THEY DIDN`T WAITED AP OFFICE 10 �iTNiiTES FOR T T4 REQUFSTINQ THAT THEY COME I WENT TO OFPiQE AND KgOCKED ON THE DOOR Fumf (CHAN; THE OWNa) BUTVCOU �T REACH MR" RON SAID HE WAS TRYING � GALL IDE NTZPICATI0N. HIM. I AGAR ASKED FOR G HONES HE WALKLrt; OUT OF THE Btli,.DiNG TO HIS DONk ANYTHING WRONG« YOU DONtT HAVE PTO-FOLLOW ME HE SAID, "I HAVENIT CITATION AT HIS CAR, IP THAT WOULD BE MORE COMFOTME- FOR F FE 1tATHER IN THE OF HIS F.HPLOYEES IN I OFFERED T4 SRITE THE BLACK HANDBAG E BUILDING. HU DECLINED. MR. FOR BROUGLrt SACK A SMALL INTO TEE BUILDING. fNE WSMUC `SMS. iNGH IT ON ALSO LOOKING FOR L,T,CFr�JSE, PRESUtfAByYa WITHOUT SUCCESS. EIS BRIEFCASE, MR. RON EXCUSICI IAIMSEL? AGAIN TO Go I.D. THERT, I FOLLOWED � � OFFICE, SAYINS HE MUST HAVE LEFT HIS PAGE. I BLJcKW HIM TO THE OFFICE WHERE HE TRIED TO SHUT TO Da0 SHUT T DpOR, LET ADVISE.) PAR. HON I WOL CALL THE S R ' MY SHERIFF IF RE IN THE OF€IGE, By SAID HE WANTED TO TRY TO q WASH'T NECESSARY A ytg WOULll PROCEED W HARRY AGAIN, I TOLD OF HIS DRIVER'S LICENSE. H$ BEGAN OPERniING TO rIT•`TION WI RIM IT M I HAD TO STPX OUTSIDE FOR A FEW MOME rq. COMB - IATION TO THE � BENEFIT TELLING I ASKED MR. HO,7 NOT TO THE OFFICE. HE FERSIS IN OPENING � � �i TOLii FROMP I WOULD NOT BE 1A.&VING THAT ONCE HE TOLD ME I WOULD HAVE ANYWAX FOIL WHATr THE OFFICE, SAYING HE WAS I.F VH $ OS�FIGE. 'n REASON. MopX APPRQyiMATELX TWO OR GOING TO GHECX HIS BRIEF a t'fit« HON ABRUPTLY I I WE'ir SEE 14INUTES FUR .RIM Ta RETURN E ONE MORE T:L`M. I WAITED OR FOR HIM AGAIN, WHEN HE DIDN T- COME BACK, THIS TIME I FOUND MR. FAN WORKING fll2'FI SOME EMPLOYEES IN SHE.3T5. HE XEPT ME WAITING RYINGXIiM',�tTELY PIVL> 7LOYE ES BALANCING THEIR CASH EMPLOYERS. HF. WAS 'WITH THE t -.3- Wh °N MR. HON FINISHED WITH THE EMPLOYEES, HE SAID HE WANTED 70 CALL HARRY kGAIN. I REFUSED TO LET HIM AND ORDERED HIM TO IMMEDIATELY COOPERATE BY PROVj'I)ING WHAT INFORMATION HE COULD TO COMPLETE THE CITATION. HE WAS NOT ABLE TO `iaL ME HIS DRIVER'S LICENSE NUMBER., WHEN ASKED IF HE HAD A LICENSE, HE SAID;` "I DRIVE ALL THE TIME." WHEN I ASKED MR, HON TO SIGN THE. CITATION, HE REFUSED AND PUSHED THE CITATION BOOK AWAY. ME WANTED TO CALL HA.QRY 11GAI.N. I TOLD HIM IF HE DID NOT SIGN HE WOULD GO TO JAIL TODAY. HE AGAIN, R6''USED AND I SAID I WOULD NOW CALL THE SHERIFF AND HAVE HIM TAKEN TO JAIL. I SHOWED MR. HON, AGAIN, WHERE TO SIGN THE CITATION AND POINTED OUT MORE T % ONCE THAT HIS SI /.NATURE WA- "A I$�t9ISE TO APPEARS NOT AN ADMISSION OF GUILT. '1 EXPLAINED THE SIMIi,ARITY-OP, "THIS CMATION TO A TRAFFIC TICKET. MR. HON SAID "I DON'T KNOW WFAT TO DOI" AND PUSHED THE CITATION BOOK AWAY, ONCE MORE. HE AGAIN SAID HE WANTED :'0 CALL HARRY. I ADVISED MR_ _HON THAT I WOUM NOT ALLOW ANYMORE TIME ON THIS AND I WAS NOW GOING TO SUMMON THeSHERIFF TO TAKE HIM TO JAIL FOR FAILURE To SIGN THE CITATION. AFTER A TOAL OF 35 MINUTES OF DELAYS AND EVASION, MR HON SIGNED 7-m' =TATION. WHEN I THANKED HIM FOR HIS 000PERATI0:1, HE REPLIED, "I HOPE YOU MAME DTI ". HE WAS WEEPING WHEN I LEFT THE PREMISES. SUMMARY: A COPY OF THE MINUTES FROM THE MANAGER'S MEETFd4G`OF 6 -22 -88 IS ATTACHED, NOTE ITEMS # 6 AND 11 WHEREIN WE ADVISED HARRY C'S STAFF THAT MANAGERS WOULD 'BE CITED FOR BLOCKED EXITS. MR. HON WAS PRESENT AT THAT MEETING.., IT IS INCONCEIVABLE THAT HE WAS NOT AWARE HE WAS IN VIOLATION OF THE LAW BY iLOyKING THE REQUIRED FIRE EXIT WITH FURNITURE. . SAN D. WOLFE, FIRE IRSFE—CT-O / TIGATOR e7 A n4w tly) D TE Pus PWU";.e ,.a A� no'; 3Ni> OD'00!:i� J U4ps112rn s ; ONV It iYar i ` 11 JStlss e u PntiwbNp Se '.NOW 9 Aq Psys�Und o7 4mpR Inimm Alllld3llt/0 3 :DNINltVM FOOTHILL FI 0�3� ' -LNyjaOdW1 ? P, O.Bdc 35 RE PROTECTION D! (714) 987.2j3 Rancho Cucamon STRICT 5 • 9a, CA 91741 - NOTICE ^ TO I OUNTY AF SAN BERNARDINO APPEAR DATE NA ctne' Citation ND.-` 1012 EXECV'TED ON THE ISSUING OFFICE SIGNATURE A WIT OUT BEFORE A J VRFOFq R A CLERK OP THE MUNI IP L DISTRICT, C A OI CALIFORNIA, LOCATED AT A, ON THE DAY OF /' BORN 4PPROVED BY 7H ORIGINAL CALIFORNIA, REV.:' EV. E JUDI 11.10.68 P, CIAI COUNCIL LIP 853.9 22'34790.000 t 7R,. ,1 SEE REVERSE SIDE ` X17 t, f !� / T` NOTE TO FIEB I alephone Gall from harry Chan i July 1, 1988, 0807 hours 1 Harry Char cegah the conversation by asking ne to "help out with citation". I asked Harry what he meant and he said that his managers az,� "freaking out" because we are picking on them. I offered Mr. Chan that we were picking on no one, that in fact, we were protecting his customers by enforcing minimum life safety requirements. Harry explained that his managers get so involved running the operations that they forget 'Lhe "small stuff ".. He again asked that i "help" him with Susan (Wolfe) and the "ticket ". I told Harry, that the citation appeared warrantedr was served at m7i di,rectio*1 and would be carried -through. I also advised :Harry of assistance I co`41d offer, ie, furniture configurations, ideas for securing furniture at its required locations, more manager`-�taining. When Harry expressed concern about the effect of the citation on the upcoming Planning Commission meeting, I reminded him t,�at he appeared to me to have a problem with his managers that shou�d be addressed immediately and that 2 wo_zld, if asked, testify to whatever cooperation or lack thereof that was maintained during the 30 -day evaulation period. Susan Wolfe was present for the latter part of this conversation with Mr. Chan, REC /rb Ed :1 k 11 CITY' -iF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: July 6, 1988 TO: Ot;.•o KrouV , O(,puty City Planner FROM: Nancy Fong, Associate Planner SUBJECTT., INSPECTION OF LANDSCAPINS MATERIALS FOR HARRY C'S RE5ipUtE�NT On June 23, 1998, the owner of the restaurait, Harry Chan, submitted a Landscape Plan that shows his proposal to correct the landscaping problem. They are as follows: '. Replaced all.. dead trees. 2. Planted an additi')nal 94 Acdoanthus. 3. Mixed dirt with 50 sacks of plaPter mix. 4. Replanted over 100 flats of Ivy grourtds;ov2r in Apra. and an additional 80 flats presently. 5. Re- adjusted all sprinkler heads so they Water 1,roperly. 6. Maintena%,# company will work two (2) days `A Meek Instead .)f one (1) day to mako sure that all the groundcover will grow properly. Staff conducted a routine inspection of the site on Tuesday, July 6, 1988 and made the following obse►: »tions: 1. New trees have been planted to replace the dead ones along Foothill Boulevard, 2. The groundcover for the entire site has been improved tremendously with the addition of flats of Ivy groundcover. 3. Staff has spot- checked some of the irrigation system and found it to be workfni properly. 4. The added Acapanthus are growing well and improved overall the entire landscaping material. t f i� MEMO TO: OTTO KROUTIL RE: LANDSCAPE FOR HARkY CIS July 6, 1988 Page 2 At this inspection meeting, staff also suggested. the following to,Mr.. Hatt ry Chan; 1. New trees planted along the west operty boundary should be doubled staked per City standard. 2. A number of trees have lost their tree ties. New trees tie:; should be installed., 3. Add four (4) 5- gallon sire Fern to the area in front of the emergency exit next to the east of the building, 4. Add more flats of ivy groundcov (., to provide & coverage of soil, especially at 'she top " the slope aloi,y the east and west zide of the but. ";ng. S. 5baff suggested tha ;t to prevent people from walking through the planter area, that handreiling should be provided along that planter retaining wall. NF:ko qP :r TINEPINING ... ENi wM..NM?-4T 0. 1414 UNIVERSITY AVENUE R'WERSIDE, GA 92907 (714) 686-2212 Jane 23, 1986 "iv of Rancho CuoMMIg>a PlatmJM Department 9320 iktsel.ine Road Rancho Wcamongs, CA 91-730 Dear Sir, The entertainment permit that H=z7 C's is applying for `would partaiai to many fine promotions, Because Harry Cis is a restaurant /lounge oix ration we ,recognize our value to the ca mKin .ty and realize that trig bar pr notions mint compliment the food segnmit of the bu3iness as fine dining. Bemuse of the wide variety of our promotions and the fact that many of `.barn are tied in with local or national Sponsors and change from week to week, it is hard to designate a set °fie for them. Ti*refore Ve request an entertsiriunt permit to arlloa our Rancho Cucamonga store to bring in many fine promotions In our lounge. Sincerely, Harry H. Chats President Hfc /vr w f SUNDAY O PAO"?,X'13RUNCH S BAN UET MCILITIES AVAILABLE y... _.� z Lu CL O LIJ W z M 0 U u- C) 710_ LL H CC CL V, j In PART I Uniform Applicatial GENERAL INFORMATION REQUIRED NAME OF PROAOSED PROJECT RELATED FILES !. LOCATION OF PROJECT (ADDRESS) /OB a do eq&j Ato Par APPLICANTS NAME TELEPHONE ADDRESS / mot V4 a0bnecigl-e OWNER'S NAL1E TELEPHONE ADDRESS REVIEW REQUESTED • LONDIT ;ONAL USE PERMIT* • CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — NON CONSTRUCTION* • DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT (ZONE CHANGE) • GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT • MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW • MINOR EXCEPTION • PRELIMINARY REVIEW* ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT *It Is mandator to comoleti P PROJECT OWNER CERTIPICATHM © TECHNICAUDESIGN REVIEW - CO M M ERCIAL. 09 INDUSTRIAL* ❑ TECHNICAUDESIGN REVIEW — RESIDENTiAL* ❑ TOTAL DEVELOPMENT ATAL ❑ BASIC STANDARDS ❑ OPTIONAL STANDARDS ❑ CUSTOM LOTISUBDIVISION ❑ DESIGN REVIEW (REAPPLICATION) ❑ VARIANCE ❑ ❑ ■. .. ,, I CERTIFY THAT I AM PRESENTLY THE LEGAL OWNER FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. FURTHER, I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FILING OF THIS APPLICATION AND CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE. AGENT OF OWNER MUST ATTACH A LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION FROM THE LEGAL OWNER. DATE SIGNATURE: PRINT NAi,;2&TITLE: �t!4 Ai4d Pws. ncumiVaDnr rtua FEEZAECEIVED RECEIPTNO. y1 rr� T Rancho S3i�FT Cucamonga PART if 1UNIFORM APPLICATION NON- RESIDENTIAL PROJECT SUMMARY DEVELOPMENT TABLE _ Project Name f�ifk+Eyr C'8 �saete��arli Reference Pil -No Locatlon 140877 5, ®ofrs, �4v� (Staff Use Only) General Plan � ft'uh eic Ceet�.rr ax � G Development District: PROJECT AREA Gross (incl. area to centerline of abutting streets): Net (exclusive of dedication for major external and secondary il: acres: Z • ZZ' stream acres: =a$' AREA DISTRIBUTION iIfta d an Aiiat 94nert}i..: � ;.1� � ' `'.��4 FARM Building Coverage /&',ficr%J -1-4 ¢)% Landscape Coverage -4& We- VehicLlar Area (incl. parking): 4e6-0 75— s.. 7L. FLOOR AREA DISTRIBUTION BY PROPWE 0AArea of Building Pad I4c. of Stories Gross Floor Area (sq. ft.) Proposed Its t90 m SQ �`f Si �� e • asYa� /A,4000 Oro *.r s .. e PARKING c ••fir - s• '�. Type of Use Parking Ratio # of Spaces Required # of Spaces. Provide cm. i/.®0 sJ ar. a Total No, of Parking Spaces Required: /6 f Total No. of Parking Spaces .Provided: / ?l No. of Compact. Spaces % of compact space to Total Space t � r d ti d O / / � qiA� Oh .fit: iii l _4 t'.. t { {� t a G V. a °E ♦r v D �1 d �\` ) J.- a ' R IS s LL d K O r d p ;D M Y D r � r GO . Wg, 8 alaw Poor 0 u all tr ri I. I '[fill 1!ti A Mw nv s. JL z *-Q 00 Lm e F CITY C�� CITY OF ��F O r CAN ONGA f -PLANNING DIVISKYN TITLE L„X,HIBrr: SCALE- �' _ i' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM i DATE: June 2, 1950 TO: Public Safety Commission FROM: Mark R. Lori Aft f� r( crry of RANCHO CUCAtr ON j A Hr. Harm Chan 1414 University Riverside, California 92507 ©ear, qtr. Chan: rose Otr1M 5= 607. F-Imho CuaMOV4 C.lUamu.. 91730,1-1141489-159t i May 32, 1988 In recent months, the %ity Council and Public Safety Commission members have ecome very concerned with the problems which have been occurring at your rtstaurant in Rancho Cucamonga. lie request your attendance at the next Meting of the public Safety Commisfion at 7:00 Val, on Tuesday, June 7, at Lion's Park Coaet;nity Center(, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga. At that aeeting, the COM17'sion will ba reviewing the conditions of the Conditional V14 Perot add Caba *et License which were approved by the City prior ,:o the Opening of Slue restaurant. Staff reports will be presented an the following: 1) Sheriff's Dept - Summary of Law Enforcement problems 2) Business License 'Dept - Report on Delinquent Admissions Tax** 3) Foothill Fire Protection District - t:apert oca �tecent F ,c Code Violations 4) Planning aivisiO ROOS',r of Conditional Use permit G;Grsitions Mr. Chan, the City ± vary concerned about the serious problems which have been occurring at your Rancho Cucamonga; restaurant. We will bs ttviewing the problems, and we will be forwarding a rrcourandation to the City Council the further review. Sincere y, Lauren m. Wasserman City Manager f LMi :hk cc: City council Public Safety Commission Sheriff's bepsrtcnnt Brad Buller, City 0lsnner Betty King, Business License Supervisor Chief Dennis Michael, Foothill t=it Protection District wrc. Ekborsh N. @rows CQWW*W*b" 0"rus L. Stout Charm 1, & not it let�y K d � Pamelalt wd6hr ply wti� Laumn'A. Wfssematn INTEROFFICE MEMO DATE May 12, 1988 PHONE FROM Bruce Zeir_er, Lieutenant Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Station TO Public Safety Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga ius CAaatr W SAM 1'1=rd�o SCBJECT HARRY C'S LOUNrE CALLS FOR SERVICE - A critique has been completed on Harry C's Lounge located at IC877' Foothill Blvd., Rancho Cucamonga. The survey period is from December 19, 1987, to May 7, 1988. The breakdown of the typee of calls for service at Harry C's Lounge during that period is an. follows; Disturbances /Intoxicated persons (15) - 8 complaints filed with District Battery on persons (1) Attorney case pending Thefts in parking lot (5) Traffic collisions (2) Stabbings (1) - complaint filed with District Attorney - case oendinav;, Shootings (1) - compal int f()ed with District Attorney case pending Nar ^otic arrests (5) 4 comalaints filed with District Attorney - ca di Felonious assault (1) - complaint filed with District Attorney - case rendinq A recap of the calls shows a total of 31 formal calls for servici- from the CAD ca�lpdter. The majority being disture4nces, fights, and intoxicated subjects. Other incidents include vehicle accidents, thefts from vehicles in the parking jot, narcotics possession, one moderate injury stabbing and one major injury shooting. (These numbers represent the formal calls for service only.) A high profile enforcement program was initiated due to the size of the evening lounge crowd and the types of associated r activitae•:. The activities include consumption of alcoholic j beverages in the parking lot, the young crowd consuming alcohol within the lounge area and the arrest of subjects in and around the lounge area for possession and possession for sale of narcotic substances. z additional follow -up enforcement followed: involving plain clothes detectives, 't :; Department of Alcohol Beverage ' Control and Foothill Fire District for fire code violations. The e.:act number of man hours spent to police the establishment in recent months is unkn9wn. There has t f 11:M OF RANCHCi CUCAMONGA i'e3tDLia Lox bUY. Raa+tl+a CVetmcnga. Glitatuu 4tT30, 1 ;111954.1931 May 2p, 1988' :tarry Chan 1414 University Riverside, CA 92507 SUOJECT. HWY WS 0, 7AURApa1', RAWCNG CUCP.4NM Dear Mr. Chan: Perloditally, the City of Rancho Cucamgestablishaants to en busitess pance With city "gulationa, Speeificrlly those requiro"Onts for !anti use and property maintenence as contained within the Developapant Codeu and the conditions of approval of raa applicable permits. During a cent inspection of the Narry C's ta'qestiurantke , possible naa•conplfance it@W Were noted. The City would this opporte:; ;i4 to bring your, attention to this* matters, and anticipate your positive action to resolve this situation. Landscaping within parking C tas and arosnd i~ W -1 -Ji, appeared to lack appropriate mi!intsnance. This irrigation Syss need atone routine fasPICtion to provide consistent operatio -,j. Damag#d plant ciaterfals Shoup, be re laced quickly upon observation, and in ganeral, more aatUntiofe shout, be given to sustaining plant Life in a NalthYi thriving conditl4n. the entertainment provided k* tNr restaurant is regulated by Entert'M*nt Pe"t #$I -01 {tt�py Attached). As a Planning Commistaon, only the Per 13raaance of a live disc $ockq hags fleen permitted. Previous ins *pfttions of It" enterta"ina of •icV41tg have found compliance with J�Wfticns of appezval, fncluoins a Presence of security personnel. It is importent w ,_ note, hoarever, that Any aiteratfon or droansion of entertainftnt provided at the restaura», even of ae tenparary nature. Tequires the approval of the Planning Coaa+aission. An application for such a modification to your EntertAl"0 raet Paraeit My be obtafne+d fraaae the Planfi,!&4 Division. �. Chad" 1,su"ttat Patf Wt t4 k:!ar lYnserr •�. -_ -- Jurm!t r i F CIT-' 4F RANCHO f UCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE': June 1, 1988 TO: Lauren Vasserman City'Manager FROM: m Hart Administrative Services D1rattor By: Betty King Business License Supervisor SUBJECT: Admissions Tax - Harry C's LZ;•o ' L' c mss+ Admissions tax from Harry C's is delinquent for the months of March and April 1988. Their payment of the admissions tax has been consistently late. prior to January 1988, additional late penalties a i internst were month i made phone calls to remind them that waived'„ and each payment was due. January 1988, they work advised that'tha additionai penalty and Effective ' Merest be due and that i would no longer call. woatid Below is a record of their payments, beginning When they opened for �uslness in July of 1987. MONTH 7rAT� DUEDUE DATE PAID. July - 1987 August 21, 1987 September 2, 1987 August - 11987' September ii, 1987 October 27, 19x7 September - 1987 October 11, 19$7 Octobl+r 27, 1987 October - 1987 November 11, 19 " December 18, 1$87 November - 1987 December 11, 1987 December 18, 1987 December - 1987 January 11, 1988 January 19, 19$8 January - 1988 February 11, 1988 March 16, 1988 1 February - 1988 March it, 1988 March 16, 1988 March - 1988 April 11, 1988 unpaid April - 1988 May 11, 1988 unpaid May - 1988 ,tune 11, 1988 t r I oaihl I PROTECTIO-N '• V. 8 Q 3S • 647'7 AMETHYST ST.. RANCHO CUCAMONOA 91701 (714}987.253! TO:.-'Lauren M. Wasserman, City Manager FROM: X,loyd B. Almand, Division Chief /Fire Marshal SUBJECT:. Harry C's Restaurant DATE: June 2, 195; At the incer'..ion of this AstaNlishment we had nothing but digh hopes, as our COMMUD; -ty needed a restaurant of this type. That was our thou,4ht than. Since the inception, we actually have had nothi�-U but one problem after another. I have attached copies of Correspondence and notes that iltdicat;-� our r.tteopts to work with For. Chan to rectify problems, such as overcrowdingp blocked exits, furniture in exit ways, not reporting fares and no emergency evacuation during actual emergencies and fire alar^4. We believe ws have gong the 1i:m4t in our attempts to get Mr. Chan to see t "e .need''fbr public safety and to move ahead to meet that ae:.j, Mother's Day, 1988 was the final straw, when many,pf the viols dons listed above were again noised, plus = .;them, and a citation was then issued. Although we realize th;t a citat on .Could have been issued earlier for overcrewdino and that we Iegally could have closed the night �,ub portion down for failure to comply with a lawful order, we chose to work.aii.h Mr. Chan and hi3 managemen team to alleviate the problems, or at least that was our istOnr and desire. It has become, very apparent that Mr. Chitin chooses to do things contrary to, and in violation of existing cannot, aAnd w ll not, be tolerated by the fire district any longer. We encourage and support strong measures to mitigate any eUture problems in an effort to protect our citizens. t 0000" f 1 Boothill Fire g i P TE'CTI N DISTRUCT P- O. SOX 35 ♦ 6623 AAWHY5T 5T. - RANCHO CUCAMQNGA '9'701 1714) 987 -25ZS j May 1$, ;988 I Mr. Haary Chan, Ovhw Hav,,y C's Resta:uanf 10$77 Fcothill goutevasd Rancho Cuc3manga, GA 51733 P Dery Mr. Chan: This tettQr is to airs, as a trim r6coMm relation to secures chain the sprint -!r r ccatral velva an the riser. Y o pan On March 11, 1988, tt * sprit, rter riser was unchained to allot short down for rapish' of a bviken gauge. T�I$ reoain was necessary dens to sec act of vand_iism upon the sprinkler gauge, ' On March 12, 1988, again asked Mike to have the sprinkler r3sar techained :n the open position. As of May 8, 1988, this has not been dcnac The chain and lock are still hanging .from the contrdi valve, l Due to the filet there has already boen om documented sasv of sabotags to this fire protection ayslaan, it is extremely Imponant it have aha oxtra protections of tires padlock ant] chain, in additlon ?o the molest* !rag alarm. Your prompt response it appreciated,, A rainapection is schedul,)d for May 23, 1988 at 9:00 a.e17. 5incer ly, 1,�+��r 11D/. ;I Susan Q, lBOlffr 1 Fire Pr vention InsC actor Rt- `3 ADDRESS: 1Q977 i Fao h,i7 CA: ^ . ,--- ..�.,. 5 -14 -8 During a night ` ! reoccu. inspection, 2 observed the fallowing - ..,1g' violata oils ; 1 A table had been between the labb Placed in the doorway and dance a; a_a, , ("_'his table is used f r at s to place their drink; when exiting the use the bathrooms.) dance Boar to � 21 Four chairs were Placed in 1 of the (north) bar, the exit aisle r I imN=diatel y _ _ contacted the manager, Mike Miller, who e obstrucc.ons removed. entered the dance aces, I asked'to see the- ea ` (thez Were counter. eti over 300 cars in the a•?4 Street's. The dance floor p3x'lting area moving was e3ctrEme through the Crowd was difficult, {��, Y , 4.rcivded and se y the leant. • ' J i r T t i I ` 'e-IJ FOOTHILL FIRE DISTRICT COMPLAINT DATE OF COMPLAINT Mau 8, Isee VIOLATION: Uniform Fire Code,;ISSS Edition, 5fintion 3.101: "Unlawful Continuance of Fire VIOLATOR: Michael %,ictor Mil -er ?5309 Fincecreek Line W IMiMgto". EA 90744 C:A DDL N MSOS1359 DOR: 11 -ES- Sa WMA, Brown /Brown, 5'll" iSS lbs. VICTIM: People of the State of California WITNESSES: Vera A. Arrhur Foothill Fire District 6883 Amathyst Street Rancho ICucamonaa, CA 9170, Ralph E. Crane Foothill Fire 01%, is ict 6l;83;thy1,4t Street Rancho C,'.:. -among a, CA 91701 ;DMPLAINT: On Sunday, May S. 1386, the undw:signod obseeved.a :white tent whi=h was totally coverinU n1-6 south exit from Harry G's Rc stauraint, 10877 rooth.ill tioJilavard, Rancho Cucamonga. The restaurant was open for businoss and the obstructaed exit has baen designated as a rvquirad exit from the df aco /dance. azsa because of the larva occLpant land. At approgimataly 1 :30 p.m., accompanied bd my supervisor, Ralph Crare, I c;-�nducted an inspected at the abovenotid place of business. We found the foI4�awing: South Exi•tz 1, The doubly exterior exit domrs and p,itic area were completelu enclosed by a canvas tent. d. The doors werw propped open and a 41ni,-,ig table and chairs set up in such a way 02 to block one side' of the exit. -3- inadequatL far the number of peopla in the restaurant. In. addition, tSee overflow Of people waiting !far ",.ales ereutad an obstacle course in front of these doors. In the past year wince the opening of Fzrry Vs Restaurant Cin July. 1987), the fire department has had numerous contacts and complaints concerning overcrowding anet blocked exits. We have mat several tines with the owner and with Michael Miller, one of the managers Csubject of this complaint). Can one occasion, a meeting was held with thew city building official, members of the fire department; and a prafessior3i- fire /building /life safety consultant, who w8s,;hired by Mr. Chan in an effort to rind a legal wrsy tea increasa his ccci;pant .!cad for the diaco/dence area. As a _jlt ;of this meeting, Mr. Chen constructed an additional single door exit on the east side of the building, leading From the disco /dance area, which allowed him to increase: ale occupant load considerably. Following this S,ncting, Mr. Chan submitted m float` plan, signed and dated bQ nr. Chan, on which he made the following notes: "4a chairs or tftbles allowed in this area" Cwaiting*rcum).' During the nay 8th inspection. a table was planed in the doorway. "This areaL to remain free and clear of all chairs, tables anL obstructions at all times" Cexit aisle, west side of dance Floor). On nail ath, a buffet table and dining tables and chaff -s were 'set up in this area, with no apparent regard for code requirement: concerning aisle widths for exiting. Due to the cb.,,`ruated ,exits and aisles found on Fiat' 9, 19 ®8, during a times worn tha resteurant was extremely crowded, it is the opinion of te°.3 undersigned thbt, had there been a fire, loss Of life wowld have ray v.urr,:d. Mr. Miller hart been present on numeresus occasicsv_ *,s during fire departm nt inspections and discussions concerning exits and ovesrcrowdinj, 8t' his can admission, he has worked at least :two other restaurants in a mwne;gemOnt position. Therefore, )t is, inuzncsi tall fl 1rtt� �.aow.�aa ,, ARTICLES �t��t 1 ' COMPUAt ® E WrIll `iC,PERS AND NOTICES unttwful htiistNa. d Fine Kmrt! 41 Soc. 3.161. AMY 4W&W opera1129 or - intaisdeg W o-*+pun )" prey, or vehiek subjoaw this Code who shall ,peoult any lire hazard m eaiu m piamtsas I' iedw his eoocolor wbo*hallfailto: ummdsm to afiircjQarard whm adsed wsoffadw do so by L'49 ei W or hit dWYillt �onrsdtepVts' Mmvc Lwl b- -ritcy of a nsnidemoarict �,ftmpuanm with orisir of Noah Soe. 3.Ip:. Any ceder or notice issuad or sect W as pmvidcd ini this ei� snail t or m ms ibkto? oilier ,oetu port ' wtirl►batheaewMeGOperaaa F'm >� t eeotMpl+ed eheew, ditimorvioiat' soato which thaorderornairtprMaitu .IneaYSat ptosM+t dmla w pawn or pmperty isiutuaiiue eomi+iimm t"ll be requusi '' It tbo Wddutgacedmpa m imisownedbyoneptsotiandoeeapiodti aeothetvrdtsr lease or WmWise. tmd the mdar orbowce mgwues additiats or ebagge in the building or pmmises such as vvoitld tmtriadmly hwomc Teal esmte an{,-!Pc the property of the owner of fiat building or Mmis6 1 such order or nueia Shull be mnp)i d w lib to the owna=lasthe ow %w wA oc :upam have othawat a}RMed betweet: themselves. in which evaat tdc occupaut s a13'eomphy. Compolanos Wain GonOQm'.` tlon Tai " See.3. 143. A buiidibg, peanisas rtrtbing shat Sot t+e 4csd what a violuiatt of this code u!aottd m a sag atfwted Moiler Sesnou:'2�s. Flontovai or D jMmtlon of Signs Wra@o See. 3.104. A sip oe us posted m affixed by the chief or his a ld=zod (' ti:presemmve shall Mot be mutilsied. lost v* w'teatoved vrilio�a sutkafst5 ca do so. t .. 'S 11 r , '� FO P T TII �T DIS T UCT P. 0. BOX Is.* 3 AMETHYN ST. «RANsHo curA,,A0Nr,& 91701 1714) 987.2. =:,a May 9, 1988 i Mr, Michael MI iier Harry Cry 10871 Tpocibi if Boulevard Rancho. Cpcamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Miller 1 have just been rotIfladby the lAstriat Attorney's Office that the municipru courts are =oving this week to their new complex. Therefore, ttA aPpaarance location listed on your citation should .;A 8305 Haven Avenue, Rancho Cur4mottga. i Please ba sure to appear at the above address At 31*00 a.ri.. on Tuesday, .June 7. 19Qa, Sincerely: Vera A. Arthur Fire Prevention 5pecialiltt VAAsaIr 1. y; , -- Harry C � 10877 Pnmi-hill I, I 'S During And snspE�Jtion due to blockilig ao � exits `,during Mother's Day_ brunch, -the offer wxs,,,. ,nade, at the suggestibn of Mike Miller, to zonduct,�' class for Harry C's management on fire code k:.equire / ;�hts ; for a - public assembly, Fire Safety Div ; lion Supervisor /� ane advised Mike that our Opartmeht would be more , " ".Klan willing to, work with their staff and asked him to s� alj us when he wished' to schedule something, P O. BOX 35 • 03 AMETHYST $T. RANCHO CUCAMONGA 91701 - (7141967-2535 ` r - March 23, 19$8 i lI l Mr. Harry Chan J c/o Harry C's 10877 Foothill Boulevard Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91730 !, i Dear. Mr. Chan: T believe we are nearing the end of some trying peaiods for you and all other public agenrIes involved. This, as ycu know by now, will be the last time the Fire District : will address an increase in your occupant: load, as long as -he structure remains an i-,:s currant configaration. In order to finalize this phase of changes, and thezeby increase your, occupant load, all oi` the fo'ilc wing items must be approved and /or completrd with all cnpropriate signed documents on file with the Fir, Dijtr ct. 1. All Building and Safety raquui.reldents i.,N and signed as final. 2. All Fire District requirements in and signed as final. 3. Final nesting arrangements must be signed anti dated. one copy is to be kept at Bar I'l and a second copy at Sar #Z. Thr -se copies are to be sealed in plastic, and mus—, be available upor. request. The seating, arrangement rust not be changed. 4.. A wt Ytten plan de't�",.; ling your D3licy nor keeping ar. accurate acciunting of the patrons utilizing tie -bar/disco area must be submiytec 7 _o tho Fire District. 9. The correct UL and StAte Fire Marshal listed panic hardware mt= be installer?_ on neW exit :door but of the bar /disco area, A: Harry C si March Da9 'three 9'- A new �ccup3nt load apglicaticn and permit must be completed and on >ile :n the F:re District office. This will be accomplished the last item a,fte all others have been completed. With the afOrement oned l cs.: then move_ forwcrd andConse in Plae, believe aspects and pressing needs of inntrat o oth s business al cone rnv Please ^dvi se i�a when all. these � ite:.ts are complete O we may make provisions for a final insPeetion. Sincerely, Lloyd B. Almand Division 'Chief,/ ,Fire Marshal LBA /s s i I i ' iJ originai for 0awl rOOTHILL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT coop-D TO-:*' Ralph Crane, Supervisor I. DM: Vera Prthur, Fire Prevention Specialist SUBJECT: Night Inspections - harry C'. DATE: Marc: =5, 1909 Inspector Susan Wolff and I conducted night insPe —a.:ns at the above occupancy on Friday, Marcia 11, 1988. During our inspection at approxivat,Ay midnight, in the presence of Deputy Gonzales, we discovered Live round, tall tables it the front lobby. Several _eople were standing at the tables, drinking. Two of the tables were locateC in :zont of the fire extinguisher and manual pull statii�n, near the restrooms. Another was placed -4a the exit opening leading to the dance floor. Inspector 'Wolfe explained to Hrarry Chan that this was a lobby and could not have sables in it with people stanaing around, drinking. She stated it would change the use of this area to allow the tfz- Qo(vs. Mr. Chan became agitated and steed people needed someplace to put their drinks and purses when they went . to the bathroom. Inspector Wolfe again advised him the tables could not be in this area, noting that people were not placing their drinks on them to go to the restrooms, but were standing at the tables and drinking. Personnel were directed by "like" to "emove the tables and Mr. Chan continued arguing for bout one minute. The tables were placed in the non- smoking dining area, which was unaccupsed.. An roximately five minu`:es- '.star', while sanding at the (south) entrance t ;', r -he dance floor, Mr. . ^nan azoroached and asked Irs�;ector Wolfe if they could talk outside. Oft Ind P 1= Quaffi�y NIGHT IhSPBC:'IOKS, F'R W, Y, XMtCB F 1988 h aARRY C'S r a..34 :. .t,. ♦. oaeucan t load .;.M W.,Py we ., eq'a~ 4 nSnS -4 Cain .. 54 d.'S. Occ=pa: � !cad 204 W 2IC:+ k? Ct aCC1UGG.. 17. e::ere we=e still c:ee «rs alo nc the ea_- side 05 the bar _-. violation of !_ccr klar.. directed ~.heir zem,—V ,l. 2. Checked fire extingi,is)•ar on lower ramp Cf soma nG-os tag. 3. Also non- snc,ning dining room !--re ext ngv4 -skier neteds a tag. 2345 hrs. Occupant load 318 when inspection began. 2355 ..r7- Occupant load 334 .2 Mir.^.ight Occupant load 341 this is absolute maximum rapacity. The room loQko txcr melu erooded. 1. ,here were three chairs on the east side of the bar in violation of the flop= plan ° di.ec£ed their removal. 2. Five round tables and people drinking at them in J4bby. uirt*cted theiz removal beca:iute this changes then use nr this area (la scuari. feet). Area originally calculated a ? squat- feet because of lobby - wa9.tinq case:. Tables I lock sic -exits from bar. Barry argued his liquor license permits him to salt ali:onol in any part cY the astabl shment. ue was advised the Czncern is not ever people hewing cr' zks in their 'rands i.n this ter ea, but it the fact the bar fu::: _ure has been moved into =he Lobby: creating a dr4nk4ng - dining use arcia: Barry waa' also di -e ^,wed to relocAte the round cable placed in !ttn- of tb t west lea: of the s°%uth exi" doer fro^ the 'gar. Harry SA-40- he had to have this .able because glass Is no allowed in the rest rooms and "you can't expect to have people shit ar.d hold a class drink it the same time ". Harry was rjtimindad that it was his choice, .o remove all the fL::�: :iture =rom tale bier and the f -re de:artsant was hone:ing hi decision. com;la ned about his 4stomers having no place to Pout `..heir ::rink classes or purses. Aca , Harry was remincsed -.h,-;s was his deciS4 n an dAsk would be apprectaeed if he would :yet us ^o �' ,� r Ofit'-f d Poor Quality our jc= Earry was invited ,a ccnt- ue cn- ersa _, on at the !?.re derartmert headquarters mo.n -.ay morning. _. Ft this t 4me we also directed the removal of two chairs placed across the ex: from the upper bar. Harry said this was tp keep people an the dining room from entering the bar. While this discussion was taking place, several people entered the bar from the dining reot.. S asked Mike how he was counting people. He told the lounge host to add 30 people to t' !,.i cot),.= to cover these uncounted diners. 4. Exit width measured on q_tside of building and planter wall for new ertt. Width is 3 feet, 3 inches. 5. observed cou_le lift canvas covering unapproved new doer. Th,y attempted to vse this door to exit. 0100 frs. Occupant load 275. 1. The lobby was clear. ' 2. The chairs were away from the east side of the bar. 3. Sprinkler gauge missing from riser. Assisted Marry in locating a 24 hour sprinkler repair company. At Mike's request,. I spoke with Jerry Fisher of D & 9 Fire Protection to explain the problem wi'uh the sprinkler riser. Dispa%: h was notified oy sprinkler problem. 4. The Sheriff's Department made an arrest for possession of cocaine. four parking stalls a;- ^y from the damaged riser. It is possible the problem with _ -e riser could be associated with the drug si ition. Per aps someone thought is they started the wa..er flok*ing, people would evacuate out the other side of the building, drawing the attention of the Sheriff's Department away -rom the back parking lot. Supervisor Crane notified of situation. Also, _h:S evading fire lane at Edward's Cinema was insp*c_ed and sound to be clear. flu ?tear yard of Advanced Wise Technolcgy was inst;,ec.ed or on -site hiydrant we thought was supposed to be installed. Could' W-_ r n d l (OH0u 21 Poor Qu 8llb xi, y _-spec ions, Fridav, Marc: Page Tree aspectec F'riagman Homes co:.strnc._c;s sof!it,s where no s ri nluers are - :nspec ed X -Mar pat -J o doors or cAains on an1C har3kgxc. Daces nx. l I i s s l C -original POt ty yae «44 eaGaCL2rtE , - ev: ew Cowc:; ? o =a: t :Cads tc irspec- r.. Seven sapp.sitte areas aave c sZ', ct occupant loads."- 2; 00 :?__. Meet Inspector GrisE-Inc a at varry C's, X323 rs. JccLpant load 331 . at sthrt of ir.;;aecticr.. 1. Chairs al-e blo Aron exit between north bar and cuing room. I'r13 ;7 the second consecutive night the chairs have been deliberately placed here. 2. Round d;^'nk table blocking wart lea_ ar south exit from the bar.•. Harry was Cif--acted this. This is the to move econd consecutive _igh the table has been bloc% .ng ..his exit a eventually complied but not until he arcued that an exit is only 32 inches wide and his consultant told him he has more than enough feet of exit width. 0031 Ers. C240z Harry was corrected that 32 inches is not a Proper exit width and that all his exits must be unobstructed. 3. The north bar had banquet type tables .set uo for a party. .here were several chairs at the tables. I-like was asked to break' down this arrangement, tr, soon as mc4sib'!e so the furniture could be rcv4rned to tht approved floor plan design. 4. Harry was asked tc have sprinkler rise, c'�ained open. Occupant load 328 1. Tables s;.;ll set up in north bar ;n violation of approved f15or plan. .44ke again asked take czro of this. to ©"upant load 251 i. '.wo chairs and one table* hocking north ex4— from bay. Mike re-moved t %. � furniture, ;sound :rink tables were observed in lobbv. Ore at J reception desk any one by c1g;ir crae:hiae. N4 drinks or peopl at :hest t"!a:es. 2. "dike gas asked to have sprinkler riser• caainted' i:. the open position again. Asked 14mousine dr;ver to -love out of `pate* 4irc,. lane.. - ._ C_ V+ //y 0701 -02 o 7-13-88 PC Agenda o l of 2RE :'SJ6� . _ECE 2340 rs. .Cow g r Theater '- 1. Co.ru -._ed nspecticn w4tn marac- er , La ='3 • r s_ca.ed occupazt load signs c so3ayed.d;:4 ed him these were no longer cur a -_ due to «• changes in rooms, Will senc Z:sy o- �h�_ `al occupant loses current to management. 2. All exits inspected and doors activated. exits satisfactory. All 3. Asked management to check all exit scn light bulbs. A few are burned out. light 2355 Ers. 'Edward's Cinema 1. Fire Zane clear 2. Theater €C exit OK - no obstruction 1 3. Replace burned out exit light bulb's in main lobby and Theater #5. 0015 Hrs. Brunswick Howling Alley 1. Exit door (exterior) from b. r needs adJustment. Vertical rod is dragging pr.vCnting smooth 'exit door operation. 2. Meeting storage room storage ,, Oj 'nigh. 3. Combustibles stacked in frO44' of ,^na_, n electrical panels. Managtmm-nt was directed to stripe _loor with tape for a distance of !our feet in front of the panels. i 4. Main entrance obstructed by picnic table and umb_eila„ management directed to rzmove furn -Itude from exit aisleway. this 5, All other exit doors worked satisfactorily when tested, 6• No overcrowding observed in any areas. 0100 *rs. Magic -amp Inn 1- Met with security guard, ve_"ied Rathsellar Riom was not in use that night, 2. Observed sear exit !, cked with serving car's. Guard said Yf room way an use, carts would s roved. - .,e ` 0130 mrs. K -Mart f 1• Checked patio doors. No chains on Panic hardwar -. po Fine P.O. BOX 35.66=AMPHYST ST. •RANCHO CUCAMONGA 91701 (714(437.3535 November 20, 1897 D Harry C's Restaurant 10877 Foothill Blvd. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: Mr. Harry Chan Dear Mr. Chan: After oevera.l visits ao your local restaurant, and upon careful research and deliberation of the facts, 1 have made the fO11011ing determinations which will be imposed as requirements for Harry C's Restaurant' located at 10877 Foothill Blvd., 1- .Rancho Cucamonga. 1. The total aggregate occupant .:oad of the bar area, disco area and adjacent "conversation and viewing" area shall be no treater than three hundred and forty one (341). —This occupant load :shall be posted on the wall at both main entrances. This occupant load shall include all employees utilized within the CCanfineS of the areas listed above., 2. In order 4o accommodate the new occupant load and provide for the safety of those occupr.nts in the event of s disaster, no free standing furniture of any kind shall be allow* within the bar, disco ar conversation areas, (Exception. A umall table for the cash register, the casks register itself, and a small chair or stool far the cashier will be allowed near the outside entrance. These items shall be clear Of the exit and tisleway at all times.) ` Page Twc. 3 An automatic power cut -off switch shall be supplied to the music output side of the disc jockey station. TNT& cut -off switch 1hall l;e automatically activated when any fire alarm has been activated within the building (restaurant sides included). As the music is. silencel, a pre °prbgrammed message shall be displayed on the Overhead visual screens stating "EMERgrNCY - PLEASE' EXIT TMMED_ATELY." This message shall flash intermittently for two seconds with a one second delay (2 seconds on ] second off). 4. These items shall all be in place and cPa ational no later than Dedemgie_ 18, 1987. 5 Failure to comp;I with 4ny aforementioned lawful order shall cause a citation to be issued requiring your appearance in court. 8. Shculd it ever' be Found during a spot inspection that you have exceeded the ti.aximzm allowable occupant load, , you wi.1J1, (1 ) be required to immediately i bring the occupant load down to the requir ®d occupant loasi- utilizil v, a method to be determined by you and /or. your staff at that time (2) ',sa issued a. citation for overcrowding a place of putlic assembly and failing to with a lawful irder. This citation, wall require your appearance in court and a fine to be levied against you,., which will be determined by the court. I sincerely believe*Mr. Chan, that "if items ^ne through four are complied with and diligence is appL ed through in -house enforcement, we should newer have to approach items five and /or six. i have enjoyed the working relationship that has been established and hope that it wi9.1 ;ontinud, Please contcut me should you have any questions regarding any of these items Sincerely, L.�ya B. Almana Division Chief /Fire .:arshal :,BA /rb I eC. Jim Broeske, Xroh, Broeske & Associates Aalph CrAne, Division Supervisor, FFpD L. Denni,a Michael, Fire Chief, FFPD Mike Milker,, Manager, Iiarry Cis f ,.t 060nat Poor Quality OROIMANCE.NO. 290. 1 °q AN ORDINASCR OF TNR CITY COUNCIL Of TeS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOR0A, CALITODMIA. AMVADIRG TITLE 5 OF THE RA21CR0 CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL COT3 SY ADDING A MIM CNAPTIR 5.12 ENTITLO "RIGULA2200 Of IDTERTAINNOT" _ I TRR CITE' COUNCIL OF Tag CITF Of RANCHO CUCA?0dA DOS DRDALS eX FOLLOWS: „eBCTI !; title 5 of the Rahabo Cuosaoago Muaieipel Code is horaby 42010sf ,y the addittan of a asw Chapter 5.12 to cold, in word* sad figure$, as fal);,si �f,ry.ee.. S.t2 "jgge.1seieA a reeaxgas "•ve "aCAiIIRtt I i 5,12.010 tarsi& carulced. 5.12.1+20 tatertai'naset dafiaed. 3.12.010 Inclusion*," 5.12.040 Applieatioa for permit. 5.12.050 Tovesci4,atiom sad !oaring. 5.12,060 Notice of besria`. 5.12.070 At ±,ics zF':hoaring. 5.12.080 Desist c applitaties. 5.13.090 Cos-itsars imposed as permit. 5.12.100- Suspension or revocation of porst.` 3.12.110 pees. 5.12,130 Ties for filing applicavi ^a. 5.12.130 laeurity loari required at 5.18.149 Chapter to $Drava. 3.12.150 prohibition and pesalzice. 5.12.160 Civil reaedias available. T'j�li..D16 pax ie: eNUi tea.. No '"room at busiaeea entity shah opsrstr, sosCucto of uaa$e say place or promises open to the pubic where food or bav'erages *to gold. offered tat salt, or liven away, and where any form of astattaionent, 19 defined bersim. is ptovidei or fuvcirbed wicyaut first obtaisiu$ a permit an to d0 as beraidafter provided faz in this chapter. ej�l2.Okia ssteeeeiaese d Eieed, Raturtainment mesa*. *very .form of live eetertsiaLent, music. sole bead or orchestra, ace, play. burlesque show,. $sebios show, twice.- post"ine, scale, song or danoa, act Or aesg, ead dacco act, or say other net or parfaresece pactitipated is by one ov amen persons Eat tbo purpose of boldiag' the stccmtiaa of. gaining the attoacioa sad istarasr of. divertiag or arising gueais..or patrons. The provisions of this chapter •ball not be - daemat to unquira a permit for the following: "(if For the use of a radio or other alatcrosicai plsyback davits is nay astsblisbaoDt. except wham urillsed by as announcer or 'disc jockey' who at any ciao provaa/ any late of vocal entertainment, including the announcing of song titles or artists' n ;man in conjunction therewith.. - "(2) for any antertainseot provided tot seabsra and thetr &users at a ptivatt club where adai ens is not open to the public. "(3) Fat sotertaiamost conducted in consaccial with a regularly established aorion picture cbeatre. recraatioa pack. ciraua, or fairground. lit , �r 1 0 Ordtnance so, .7. ?aga 2. bur Q k. "(") For eacercaiamaat conducted by or sponsored by aay ban& fide :`ub, society or asaocistics. organized or incorporated tar benevolent, ebatieabta, draaatic or literary purpossa, having an established aerbership, and which holds meotiogs at ragular iatatvals of dot Jose than onto par three acaeh period. vbsa prooaeda, if goy. seising from such =Beartaiaasat are used ^or the purpose of such elutr, society or assoeiatiCa. haspiat "(i) for wercaisaaec prowi_a• ; s sola.y by piano player ar Playtag wain for tbo oauoamast of %uasca or patrons of an atcakliagabar.. Inc oncertaii:,,nat Conducted -solely an or at any ,Premise or locatiaa which to owned as operated by, or leased by. to or ilea the Oaited States, State aj C ^lifornie, County of San Bernardino, or any agency or subdivision cheroot. "S.1Xyfjaca asei3 e�� aag�, applitan:c for entertainment permit% Oka 1R Lila a vrittaa,A signed and warifttd application with the city manager. or big design** showings "(i) She cast ra4 permanent address of applicant. of ttie appiieamr�t)iflehmaaPpliease�is a Corporation, Cho a y- shall address as gat forth in Its artinlee of Incorporation au�i 02- applicant chat 1 show the Baas and raaideaae address of each of the afftoeraj direetoro. sad each stockholder wain$ not 1002 than ecaaty -five pettaat of the stoat of the Corporation. 19, rho applicant is a partasrskip. tbs applicscioa shall show the games end residaato addresses of ertch of eha members, tacludie$ limited psrtacas. "(3) Q Aetailad descriptics of the proposed entertainment, imcludLog type of tavartaiaaaae. Bunker of perooso sagas04 in the entertainment, ersaad'`"nor furtbsc iafarma"c's about Chi oacertaiamsat or satettalsaro. a tbi city manager may does aacesesty. "(4), The date, beer& Rod locatioz where the soeareeiamene is Proposed ' to be caodlsBtad,,sad the admission fee. if any, to be ebar$ed. "(S) 'ths case or asmeo of the person or parsons CROP oasible for the eamagameae or suPwwiaias ou"applicaat's business and of any antsttaianaat. "(6) a statement of the nature and Cbaratcat of applicaot'a business, it any. to be tarried oa is tcejomceice with such a tortainsent, including whether or 000 aleaboi will be served so past of such buaiaoen, "(JD L'Z)ather at not the applicant or any pa:saa or Parser: raspesalble far the o eagssent or awparviatda of applicant's huaiawa have boos. within the prcvicus tag years, coninta4 of s trims. 'the oncnre of such ®ffsase, sad the seotereo soeeived tborafcr 1es1144ins Conditions of patois at pcabaeioo� it aay. license issued "( o conjunction act hich pebeC ®sale, of at say of a aats""Neemt rsrak*Qd including the date tharoof sad aa Saacy. so of the revoking "(p) Such other reseaeable information as the 'city ma0a$er, at dasigasa, any does necessary. r E53 Ordinance No. 290 P 9 ea gi'ig.. pagm 3 1bY t1,1;12.¢SO $nw�. rf�iea sad hoe ie date 1! '—°- After the application a parent bas bean thud, the Ci[y =eager $ka11 eau an iavaseigetioa to be sad of such application, and after such investigdtaeo pas .� Ma, completed be shell Cause the application to be set for hoopla' befora cbe Rla oicg coggiaaina and $bell notify the applicaat of the date of such bearing. � °3,1x.06¢ naticw of 6 After the city wnagar has aat ohs application for beasiag, be shall cause antics of the hearing to be given to e11 property owners witkid thrall hundred feet of the ptoposgd or actual location of the applicati's business. Fos the purposes at thir posed o, nodal to propwsty 'owners aball be sufficient it given to those property Weer as such os the last P p ty oweere, vh$ aansgar $ball cases 4 Publie'enoiee* tassel event roll. Additionally, the city at business or eoteetsiasest io to be conducted. �Alldnoticed provided �for hin this o"Cion shall be is the farm add sooner ae Prescribed bg the city "eager. The aPPlitnat shall beat all coats add aspaccaa in nailing. printing. and posting such ancien and shall Pay such coat$ to the city prior to the time eat for public hearing as the Pending applideclao. /ril OPlicast shell be grounds to deny his s ata to pay such coats by cba pPlicaei &li 6p.a - �-_ -,- t.t the aids IPA Plate act for public hearing as 2A.14-ON pPlieatios. and asp flooding Co:sisofon shall bear sad d eassinn�uatln�ctiefrfactayeto evanesce rele,eat to the Applicant and euMCViaorp agployobe ae real vi the entaitsioneat proposed, iocludiq. the mature sad yalks. da ®f cba Proposed tatertainseat, °x.12 -OeO of saoliar. before tin planning COasipoioa, the pIanring ekCcarAg aaioo of the $oasis' Cedilla salt , deny nli Weaion $bail grant. stlets a y 'nest or de the aPR1iC$tied, which decision shall be final appealed to sccordsace with the provitions of toeokos 17.0? i:0409 of the Rame-ho cacaaaaga municipal coal/. tuck decision shell be set fortb 12 a saaolatios whisk obell be adopt" within [h + -ty (30) days after such dec la seaduraa. 2be planning cowtilesion ray 964 tstd applinatioq if de- small sad detataist say of the follovingt would b 1►a conduct of the e$tsbliahastt or the greasing of Cho IMP applied tiss teogld be- cofberary to. the public baaltn, safest, moral@ at welfsrs; or :be'Prvdsas or establishment is likely so be t+pareeac id as illegal, ioprr.ar at'dloordasl7 &"gar, or Prise 'e-3) The applicant at aeq other Person kasociatod with big as iPDX or Porsgar, or is a position or C, )Scigy idsaX,pisg part�ai or total coattol over the contact of the bwiaeas for which suck jparsit is aeugkt to be Issued, has lase eoar'Sead it 40-7 Comet of convoten jurisdiction of any offfaam irvelviaz the j"osassatAom. s1110 ties Or .Pssfdlisaeop of any obscene sCvv of any kind, on of a folory or of say cries iowoivipg nasal turpitude„ or has het ay approasal, permit or license issued in cenjumoplon vitb the s&In of alcohol or the provislus of aatertsiom"t revoked withifl the preceding ,five years; of nuisance; or "(A) That grestieg the application wound create a public r(S) That the sossal oporatioa of the Prasiras could irtazfera with the Pease and quiet of day sursoutdiag residential neighborhood; or any fraudulent statwement of wtotialifact inatke raquired applicsties�s;aadlag or 0 ordiaaace No. 29Q� page 4 ¢ . SfU j4u�"il " ,nun ®aedteiegg tenea"d es - ? After the public hearing as to gar application, the Planning Comsissiao in Scenting goy permit say, $180 - impose such reasonable conditions so to the use or eat {at of such perait goat deems spPCOprista. "4.:14,200 See "eeelen d,�' ereearide o$ deridt.. .After sOti.a :ad hearing,. the Montag Cosmiseica sap se►Pead Or scrota nay permit treated u 1 pursat t0 t5as cbaptat is said Coamiesioa finds and determines chat any i psrXL Ctes, his $gear cc smplsyee, or say paring cosuacted_oz seeoeiatei wit the pataittes as pesetas, director, cificar. general sssaget, os offer person who is esereie'69 asuaSerisl authority of, Or mm behalf of. the petai ;tae or any asterraiaer acting under the authority, of such permit: "(l) Made 447 false, r- ixisading or fraudulent star, -Ust of a material fact is the application for paWt, sr soy report or record required to be filed puasuaat to this chaptari at "(2) Violated say proviaisn of ebis chapter, or of emy atatuts, ordinance, or eacditioa catatiag to big permitted activity; or "(7) fs convicted of a falomg, or of say crime involving roes, turpitude; at Violated gay awlea. regulations cc eoaditicas-adopted by the Plauaisg Coestlssioa or City Cauatil relating to the persittas'a business, or Permit; or °(S) Cosductod a p$Tmitaad business in a 04820r dontrary to tba peace, bealeb. safety cad gesaral welfare of the public; of "( €) Dameeetrsted that be/ebe is %ant, to ba txtstsd mite the pciviless• Srasted by such -e Formic. "Us teeiaios at the- ylamai C Cenaiseias shall be set Inert in a tasoletios which shall he adopted vitbia thirty (70) days of the data of such decision act shalt be final unless appealed is accordance with the previsions Of $action 11.02.0405. of the Isaaia Cucamonga Hanicipat Code. "SALZabia v "e", lye fag tot am satartsiemaat permit $bail be sweaty -five dollars, payable gsaually, Om 49 Were Jaauacy let of each an4 . e+ecy year. lath permit shall be to addition to say buoinesa license fee as pay be rayuirud by tie busisass lieges* Aar at tte city. ®erases. for the year 1906- the Ise ,for an astertalmssst permit *ball be toe sea of forty dollars payable upon submission of as application. •s.14.t �,Yir fly.. ri g 'S ::i <,° All Woome who will be presently required to fits #or and ebtaia pr emtestaisQSSt Wait by reason of t6s provisieas of this ebapexc $bell have to gad including goveabst 1, 1986 . witbis which to "tile their sppHcatibas for an estertainaaen Posit with the city musager. "4./4.110 rseurirr one.! tgRi6:t' awe J��..,� All parsaea eaaduetiag a P%blie dos' es or 427 entertainment whave desciag by peerage or customers is Permitted,` st;Al bxve in attondaaae" at the Promises for the.purpoa: of supervieiag the drsting and the conduct of all patcaaa end eostcan*, a duly Iicsesad gad u�:litxrbed security goazd st 911 times aueb dsecisS is perm tted or allowed.' !,. C'Wer, the provisions of this section shall apply only to those entablishe"20 or premises rbaro a dance float at dales arts in uge$* of ant tundrsd fifty square fast is available cc designated for daseiag by customers or pattooe. _ ASS' I "s.12.tao .bant■r . gX -n All provisions at chia title inconsistent with or contrary to Cho provisions of this chapter Moro:", rspealed to the eatgat such provisions are inconsistent with or contrary ,ta the provisions of kbis ebsptsr. "4.'2.1 i0 prnbihfetc■ And nae'Itise. (1)..'It shall be unlawful . for soy person, firs, pa;toarship or corporation to violate say provision or rc fail to comply with say of eba requirameats of this chapter. Aar Fersoa. firs, psresarahip, or corporation violating say prowisi06 of this ebkptar at failing cc comply with soy of its esquirasasta shall be dasaad guilty of an iafractioo and upon conviction thereof shall be pusisbable as lolicws: "(a) A fine not excee4ia3 Oa: a" ■erne Laliara 0100.00) for a first violation; fine not txcaedio;{ 'w\t�9uaaraA aoilar■ ($200,00) for a .second vialatiaC of the sta�e.ordio4ace wtlbiA( "aaa year; "(c) A fins not exceeding Pi.re n,nara@ *�lJatg (SSO0.00) Enr na_b additional violation of the same ordinance within one Ve4r. "gacb such Fersoa, fits. purtasrsbip cc totpor4tio4 shall be deemed guilty of a sapsrate off40e3 for each sad ovary day or say portion ca24"of during which say violet #oa of nay of Cho pccviatons of this chaptec is anitcad, continued or peraitead- by such parson, fire._ partoerahip. o chapter. r u c0epar4tiO4, and shall be dssaed. puaisbab', therefore ae idad in thin "The pe isions of obis Chapter t]a1l not be construed as peesittisg conduct not prescribed battle sad shall act affect the enforceability of any other applicable aroviaioae of law. provisions "'A'A 611 fi"it r■aii■■ ai�]� 'Al.. A violet #oe of nay the of obis chapter shall cansti.tuts a nuin0ace sad nay bj abeke Ch City through civil process by el0ana of tastrainiag order, prelim or Persons" isjwectioa or Is any (that sasses pcovidai by law for the abattaest of ouch auisaaco." I 11 2= .be City Council d!clscss that abou`_d nay provision. 240:.06, Pac4Srap►. sentence or word of this chapter be Misted cc declared invalid h as Ei l I Y as court notion as a hourt of competent jurisdiction, or by Casson of any preemptive legislation, thn rewAiniag' pr9nioions, sections. Pstages"s se4442946, sad words of this cbaptse effect. shall eesafu is full terra and 11[crr� '_ the lt474r Mhnll 91611 this Ordinance and Cho City Clark 1, shall cause the as to ba_publishod Within Eifeaa11 (I3) saya .fter its passage of least coca in Eae ea9l. ■aegti. a newspaper of general circulation published is the City of Catario, Cs1ilo::ia. 411d circulated in the City of Asacho Cucamonga. California. PASSM. AFFSOV0. sad AOOP= this 214t day of Nay, 1985. ATggc suquew. Meg. Dahl. Wrigt'; NOU: Moue A23WT: Nihala eta? ri g. M or Ordinance No. joJ. Page 6 wer.rlr A Auer.leo, cic� X. at9mT A. AuTwxL6Tr clrr ct"z of too City of Rancho Cuoa.00`a� C.liforsiat do he.ahy C.r3ify that ca. forasoiat Ordiaa.ae was introduce-, At a regular aeelias of the Council of the city of Rancho Cucafoaja held an the Ith day of Hay. 1406. and was finally panned at a regular asecins of the City Council of the City of 14200 CnceaoaS. hold as tGK 2iat day of Nay. 1986. Rxecutad this 22nd day of Hay. 1916 at Rancho Cucanao`,, California. I Y4 Auth.ler,. City Clyrk • i original Poor ORDINANCE No. 198 AW ORDINANCE (1p UTLt 3 OP THE RANCHO C CAMp,Ca t40q CICUCAMONGALT KDIM CHAPTER 3.36 THER= TO IM,12 AM ADHYSSIONCS M. follows: The City Council of the City of Rancho CacaaonEa does ordain as amended SECSION % Title 3 of the Rancho Cucasanga M,nleipal Code is hereby by adding Chapter 3.36 thereto- to read as follows: ADMISS TAx Seetiens: 3.36.010 Definition$. 3.36.020 Iapoaftion of Tax. 3.56.030 Season Pass. 3.36.040 Coll•C.%on and Payment. 3.36.050 Accounting and paywant to the City. 3.36.060 For* of Return for Accounting. 3.36.080 Pafluft t Procedure, Accountings or to Pay Over Tax. 3.3'x`.090' interest. 3.36.1GO willful Paflure to Account or to PaY Over Tax, 3.36.110 Jalnt and Several Liability of Operator and Parson 3.36. 120 Main snana•'ot�Action. 3.36.130 payment by Operator Sa Lieu of Collecting Tax. 3.36.1110 Is"tions. 3.36f1So Use of Prddasdi:: JiUrpo 3`36.010 Oef4��ft!cna. Far th +lord$ and phrase$ used in this chapter' shsl be canatru•d as gut forth carthia sea of is unleaa !s Is Apparent Pros the entire contest that a different meaning is intendsd. o A. ADN13312: •admission' ineludas every act of entry by a person or patron to any portion f any pr•biaes. 9, ATTEND, 'attend" includes the torn, -Joy, watch, bid present at, . and participate in.. sae, view, witness, C. AD in lieu M PRIC61 "adaiaaion price' includes money, and in addition to or in lieu of money, any valuable CG* Includes aid reree•ived in any a nt the rf t cr privilege of admittance to an attending, any bubo!, and any Paid, or received after y additional nattaideratfon y presiaea pclvflag4 of admission oto or any pr•fises In exchange for the given or accosodaticna or Pacilitias therein located pop orlAof aucN • right or promises or any 0- CONDUCT: "Conduct" Included operate, carry -on„ maintain, keep, render, perform exhibition. air, : "aysat" toiudea •very laivi yi picture performance, Pair. meseflrg, PerPorun", race, Dance, debonstration. or Porrwhich a is psratalor additionnal admisSu�n price 13 Paid far the right ,t a1Y,(ala is involved. privilegs of attending or being sdbittsd to the use. "Event" also includ C Wj 0 Ordinance no. 198 Page 2 } qa +r the right or privilege of parGins A :motor Vehicle for wh1( a serarate or additional admission price is paid for such) right or privilege. F. OPSNATOR. *operator" includes any person. association, fire, or corporation owning, cpereting, conducting, directing, mansging, or controlling, along or in conjunction with ar independent contractor, any event or portion if which is Subject to any tax 12POSed by any provision or this chapter. 0. PATRON: *patron" includes any parson who PAYS Or, on account of wham is paid. any admission price for the right cr privil *1963 of being adsixt*d t4 any premise$ for the purpose or attending any event. ff. PREMISES: "premises• includes any property, building. Structure, enclosure, location or plate, whether isprovad or not, and whether or not the Use be owned by any individual person, fir*, association, . group, or corporation upon which any event is conducted or at or from Which any event gay bo attended. I. SEASON PASS; "season papa" means and includes *very season ticket, season a ". Passbook, club aaabersh.P, meabership card, association membership or i(,jignia. cr other device (atria: than s service pass), the ownership or pb$les$SOA oY Which antitl*s the owner or holder thersof to aealasion acre then oht Lift to any premise, 3.36.020 Imposition of To =. There is hereby imposed A tax upon every patron who pays an admissionprice for adriSaLOn to or for the privilegs, to attend, any event at any, promisee to the City, d max shall ba at the rate at tan percent CIO $) of the admissled price. 3•]6.030 Season Pass. If admission or attendsnne is under or by virtue of a season Pass for Whic11 any adaisaicn price has bean paid, the sax due th*reon shall be paid and collected at the tint and place that such season pass 13 purchased. 3.3b.09A Coll*etion and pavaant. The tax imposed by Section 3.36.020 shall be paid at the tint when and the place at which the admission price is paid. Said tax shall be collected by the person charging far such admission. 3.36.050 Acdountinr_and payment to the Situ. On or Wort the 10th day of seen . alinth, any person required to epllect the tax iaPOSed by Station 3.36.^' shall render (in duplicate) An accounting to the Dos of all such taAl s adAussionn during trim month preceding such accounting. such acs, linting Shall be filed with the Finance Director at the office of said director in the City Hall, ar.6 at the t1nt of such filing the parson. ct ;lentihsg such tax shall then and bier, pay to the pinance Director all cunts So collected as texas under this chapter, as Shawn 1a such a arccounting. the correctness o• such accounting shall be subject to audit by the Finance Director or his authorised r*prassntativos, who ire hereby Authorixed and ampowered to inspect and audit the books And eecorda of any and All persons Subject to the provisions of this chapter. 3.36:060 Form ef- Return for Accountins. A. The fares of return to be execut*d an( filed pursuant to the requireatnts of this chapter Shall be such As any be prescribed by or acceptable to the Finance Director, B. Such returns shall bt• dated, Subscribed by tht indieiuuAl. making the atat*aant stating the capacity it! which the signor Makes the $able, and the signer shall certify under the peneAty of perjury that: the statements made thersin art, to the beat Of his or h!r information, knowledge and belief, -true and correct. A r Ordinance Ha.. 198 Page. 3 ,,' Council may, in its disaraticn, authorize a person required to collect the tax inposod by this chapter to file accountings, or, pay over to the City taxes collected, or, both, _at a title or times or in A canner other than those specified in Section 3.36.050. j F.080 Failure to Fila AeccuntL�.ts or to p N Over failure., In Oast Of A. to file any accounting required by this chapter, on the date prescribed therefor, unless it is shown that such failure is due to reasonable cause ant not due to willful neglect, there shall be added to'.;he amount required :o be shown as tax on such actount:xg tan percent (10%) of the amount of such tax if the failure is for not more than 0,6 month, with an additional five perount (51) for each additional month or fraction thereof during which such failure continues, not exeeadins fifty percent (509) in the aggregate; 6, to pay the Amount shown as tax on any specified in subsection A of this section on or before the date prosera,,;4 ion payment of such tax, unless it is shown that such failure La due to rsisuz&ble cause and, not due to willful neglect, there shall be cdded to the amount shown as tax on such Accounting one portent (a1) of the amount of such tax if act ttt-� aa.: jety re is for not sure than one month, with an additional one percent 7fi each additional month or fraction thereof' during which such [allure cotil exceeding fifty Percent (501) in the agragatm. is ,.i6.090 Interest. Ie any amount of tax imposed by Section f.36.020 not paid on or before the last data prescribed for payment, Interest such amount at an annual rate of twelve percent (121) 241all be paid eor e Period from the date proscribed for payment to the date paid. 1:. -ICO Elillful Failure to Account or to Pay 0yep Tax. Any Damson required under thii chapter to coileat, account fop, and pay over any tax Imposed by Section 3.36.020 who willfully fails to collect or truthfully account for and pay over such tax shall, in addition to other penalties p- pvided by law, be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, snail be fined not more than 3500.00, or imprlsonsent in the county jail not acre than six montha, or both. 6.110 Joint sad Several Liability of Ocsratcr and Person Collectin TTaz Any person required to collect the tax i 3.3 .06 20 sad cha sposed by Section the City for the tax** • required to event are for asucheevent, together owith uteri.t and penalties thereon. 116.120 Maintenance of Action. The City my maintain can action In any court of competent jurisdiction to reccvmr the amount of taxes required to be aolleoted under the provisions_ of this chapter and for interest and Penalties thereon, and in addition ee*reto the City any, if it is the Prevailing party, may recover reasonable attorneys feet and its other costs of suit. 3.36.130 Payment by Operator in Lieu of Colleotinm Tax. The operator of an event, in lixu of collecting t"' tax imposed by this chapter from patrons of the event, my elect to pay the City an amount equal to ten percent (101) or the total admission price r,r such went. - 36.1ti0 ss�rttiona, This chapter shall not apply to. A. An event which, Is condu:tsd or sponanred by' ebrperationi, any community cheat, fund, cr foundation, organized and o a' psrsted etiont v for religious, eharitabla, or educational purposes, no part of tree earnings of which Inures to the bsnerit of any private ahireholder or individual, and the nit earnings of which are devoted exclusively to LL ' f I El KI D Ordinance No. 196,, Pai* 4 religious, Chsritabl* cr educational purposes, A- An avant conducted ar sponsored 'ror fund raising purposea by sny �olit8cal party rerogni ;ad by the Slate, by 40j candidate CO- poMtic 1. office, er by any ooasittet on behalf or such political party or candidate providing that the net prueeads from conducting such avant are devoiad solely to the benefit or such political party or for the election or such candidate. C. TO the right or privilege to park a sotar v *hicle'where a charge Is aide through the use of a wt*r device and When such parking is upon a City street or City owned parking lot. D. To an event which is conducted Or apdnsbred by rederal, state or local go.erazanta8 entity. 3.36.150 Osa of Proceeds. Awl tftae "llected under tt.. authority of this cnapter sha11 be paid into the general rand or the City. SEC -4109. us The City Council her *by deolaras Ehat.it would have adopted, this ordinance and each seet8cn, suoxootion, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof' irraspacttva or the fact that any one or sore sections, subsections, 34et *4263, clauses, phrases or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional, than ahl other provisions thereof :ball rejain in -rull force and offset. SECT D!( The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and t:1* City Clark shall attest to the sew. and tae City Clerk :.tall cause the seat to be published within fifteen (15) days after its postage at least ones: in Thi Daily Reoort, a newspaper Of general Cireulaaon, published in the City cf Ontario, California, and circulated in the City dt Aaneac Cucaoonga, California. PASSED, APPEW40, and ADOPTED this 6¢b day or April. 1983. AYES. Debi, EBQuot, Schlosser, Mikels Wits: Treat A03"T: Noce ATMTr ren H. wadanresn, City Clerk Y iReBn, Hey t / 6 ♦. q f RESOLUTION ISO. 87.102 A RESt'ILUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAINGA PLANNING CC1Rf ISSION APPROVING ENTERTAIWMJT pE.RNIT N0. 87.01 TO OPERATE AN[9 C01RitICT ENTEitTAlNiiE;l BY A DISC JOCKEY FOR DANCING FOR HARRY C•S RESTAURANT LOCATED AT IW77 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD LA A. RECITALS M On Y 21, IMF the City Caoncil Of the City of for &Cueaeshgm adopted Ordinance No. 2go� providi,sg regulation of entertainfant. On Jana 1. 1987, Harry Chan has file art applicatian for the issuance of an Entgs^&i►dnt Pemit rEp g7.p±) described abowg in the title of this resolution. - (iii) Os; the 26th day of June. 198, Rancho Curngs Planning Coa�fisslen hold a public ritaring 20 ®nsicier 4 °,) above described project. B. RESX IMION NOW, THEREFORE. the Rancho Cpcange planning COMS31on resolved as I. This Cc=ssion haroy specifically finds that all the facts sot Rgsol�[iion � ®rth in the Recitals, part A. 7f this .�1re Ind correct. 2. Bassd upon sutstantial ev,dM_,, presented to thii5 Cnesission durfng, the abovm- referene+sd hearir.,�, including the WrItten staff J " 26, 1the writtsR, signed and verified appli on' tf the applicant, this Cmtssicn hereby s�ifig*11 + �f?the as follow: a. The application applies to property located on the southwest Comer of Foothill and Sproics ore a Tot presently improved With Structures and parting areas which constitvC -* harry C'S lesuvrante, b. The surrounding propeny is y deve9 d vacant land; C. The prspased entepUi t, as cond�t4aa hereby. C=01fes Ath City ,pf Rancho ndlti* CO& requlrMntr.; f { PLAN IV— L�IISSXON RCS(;l.atTICM No. ENTU1'(A;YMEVT PEWIT 87 -01 - HMp C'S J4" 06 a6 24, 1987 3. Based upon substantial emidence presentod to this COM'sSion during the above- refersaaced June 24. I987 hearing and upon the specific findings ag fasts sett forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 a 0M. this Ca�ission hereby finds and concluess as fal1W3: (a) that the conduct rf the sstablishGent or granting of the application would not be contrary tc the public health., safety, morals Or welfare; and likely That lik the Pre 1962 or establishment are not ely to bia operattd in' an 11,401. i di;corderly unner; and aagoa apsr dr (e) That the applicant has not had any approval', perch op licenna 'ds..,od in conjunction With the $als Of aleahol or the provision of "toaWith he revoked wijsin the preceding five years; and (d) That granting the application would not Create a public naai3anc,; and (e) Thtt the nor=l operatic" of *aR preasises .would not Warfare with than peace and 4viot of any Sur- Wnding Psxicfntffl neighborhood, and edSlei A� ant KIS aunt made ra,r>ilamst Sta false fasct in � - 1gjIFgd application. t Af material 4. Based WpOR '+t* findings and conclusions. Set forth in Paragraphs 1, 9 eM . aabove, this Commission heeo 6 roiM applfcaton $W*ct t the falleb iioft: owing a. This app,mval is for a disc jockey i,%Ing vocals and playing records for lf`taa..rg plealsaam�e andj'vr dancing. d Of Expans.ioca f the donee floor eree, increase in the scale or Intensity, or other "difiestion of enterta4&-m.t shall require application for modification of .rQfS Perot?;. b. All persons Conducting S P011C vane$ or any enterUI t %hope dane1n1 by Rtftns air cUSt=@rS IS peMitttd, shall have ir . attendance at than proISIs for th SupatrviSing the dahcing and the eona#;a;f_of alb PLAWNING COMISS114 RESOL`JT:9H No. ENTERTAIWIMENT PERMIT 87 -01 Hdidl.@Y C ° S Jan 24, 1987 Paso patrons and cuw�.ars, a *ply licensed and ynlfo)N,4d securitY Owrd at all tief such done"g is Pamitud or allsa"d; HoMrer, the Plorisfans of this, conditicn shall apply only where a dance floor or dl,4c*, area in exc"s of One hendrad fifty sque�r�a Peet is available or patrons. d for dancing by cbstaurs patrons.. APPROYM AM AMPTffi THIS 24TH DAY OF JLKd , 1987. PLANNING COMISSION OF T1rM CITY-'rW PAwc CUC1 6I6 < rreart �— ATTEST: I re ry AWL , I, Brad Buller, Oapy y tTr°etary _31' the Plannino Cession c,f t4tE city of Rancho Cusaearo ha gbh Get .lY that the foregoing Aes®lut €on was bialy jnol City only- introduced. pa3ud' aW a tad br tre Plaklni"f CG=fSsion of thin Cfty of ksncho CUCTN�a, at a lar Weticq of the P1MMMO COMIssion herld the 24th day of jum. ISd7. by thq follaWn! VOW t*.bit: AYES: COlBlISSIQ�i S: TOLSTOY, EMERICX, BLAWLEY, CHITIEA, IMCNIEL NOES: COMSSIONERS: mm, ABSENT" ISBJt : wm . I EMS qw AdUk 6� it:ATtQ$1 Ftl� ��tt�' 1) HAIRRYCHAN 1414 k NIVERSITY AVE. RIVERSIC15- CA 92507 2) "HARRYC'S` 10677 FOOTHILL BUM. t;ANCHO CUC:AMO Vt' A CA 91730 3) SnteKskl mM wig be P101€ by,;Ji 019", JOdw drWV vocals and Playing rawtda �t�'• 4) niertainrnent wyi b$ tii�"skf€� 9B'n 8;00 pm tE 2:00 am at -Harry C'o` R Cucamonga at tacation: 6) "Harry Ce Is a full CeN&:r d row douse FstlFj&q a rJoackk wim oftine aril sari a(cohollo beverages, 7) Not Appkabla. 8) Not Applicabla. 73 s,' (,-TY OF RANFCI iOECUCAMON'GA STAFRPORT DATE: July 13, 1988 Mok- TO:: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Butler, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENYIRON"ENTAt ASSESSMENT AND ETIWAIMA SPECIFIC PLAN - request o amen gore - ~ p e `,. Wan a pec , a Plan pertaining to COMnity Trails. I. BACKGROUND: On May 11, 1988, the Planning Commission considered a ree ues o Consider a Community Trz:il on the west -si'de of East Avenue from a point t1,400 feet north of Highland A-lense extending north to 24th Street. After, receiving all public input on the locating Proposal, the ting a Community Planning Commision onS East EAvenuee with s the tan( cipated traffic reaching 20,000 to 30,000 average daily trips by the year 2010. As a result, the Planning Commission referred this item to the Trails Advisory Committee to review. Possible alternative tail locations. 0 May 18, 1988, the Trails Advisory Committee reviewed alternatives to a Community Trail along East Avenue. After considering the various options, the Committee felt that the preferred north-south Trail should be n the parkwaalignment ongew stside of E wenu.The Committee felt that the Community Trail would not cro.ate an unsafe situation and pointed to the Cities of Fullerton and San Dimas where eg4estrian trails are located along major arterials. As an alternative. the Trails Advisory Committee recommended that two rMounity Trails, one on each side of East Avenue, that could be located �in�ternally to any future development be provided (see Exhibit '184). The alternatives recommended by the Trails Advisory Committee were presented to the Planning Commission of; dune 8; 1588. At that time, the Planning Commission recommended that the trails located on either side of East Avenue be pursued (Exhibit "B "). I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ESPA 88 -03 - City of Rancho Cucamonga July 13, 1888 Page Z 0 11. �r« gists: A. General: 1n eval"ting thf location of the Community Trails oca a on either side of . °ast Avenue, staff notes that the areas in questions are PlAmarily undeveloped properties or large cots: with one or twc single family homes located on them. atthe southwest corner Of EastcAvenue and Summitp Avenue, Qwhich initiated the trail discussion, is in the process of going through the various City reviews and will be scheduled for the Planning Commission in the near future (see Exhibit "b "}, As proposed, this subdivision does not provide for a CoMunity Equestrian Trail internal to the tract. If the proposed amendment ti adopted by the City, the tract map would have to be revised to reflect this now condition With the Community Trails located on both sides of East. Avenue, staff has some concern about potential mid - black crossings. Within Tentative Tract 13808, for example, the Community Trail would cross a local street acid -block at the southern portion of the site and then extend north to Summit Avenue. At this. Point, the trail could either cross Stwit Avenue mid -block ..r the trail fensa could direct trawl users to the intersection of Summit and east. Avenues where the crossing could occur at 'a Community Trail would have to beiprovided on happen, side of Summit Avenue running to the west to meet the north -south trail (see Exhibit "E"). B. Environmental Assessment: In reviewing the proposed, staff has de`icerm ne a no sign ficant adverse environwintal impacts will be created as a result of the vl°.oposed amendaen�t. If the Planning Commission concurs, issuance of a Negative Declaration iiould be appropriate. 111, FAC75 FOR FINDINGS.- In order to amend the Etiwanda Specific Plan, psi �F "annfin"g'"C� 'lesion r!Mst arrive at facts to support the following findings: I. That the subject properties are suitable for trail use in terms of access, size, and campatib )ity with existing land uses in the surrounding area•, an�i 2. That the proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and Aft f o-r i PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT = ESPA 88 -03 - City of Rancho Cucamonga July 13, 1988 i Page 3 3. That the proposed Specific Plan Tzendment is in conformance ! with the General Plan. Ill, CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Daftly Report newspaper as a public hearing. V. RECOMENDATION: Staff tecotmnends, that the Planning Commission � adop e 'esaiution recommending approval to the City Council for Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 88 -03, indicating interpal Conmunitjf Trails on both sides of East Avenue,;�nd issue a Negative Declaration. j Respp lly su Br Bu er c t; anner BB :SM :vc Attachments: Exhibit,, "A" - Existing Community Trail Plan left Exhibit "8" - Proposed Community Trani Plan - Alternative I Exhibit "C" - Proposed Community Trail Plan Alternative 2 Exhibit "D" - Proposed Tentative Tract 13808 Exhibit "E" a Mid -Block Crossings of Internal Community Trails Resolution Recommending Approval I I Ks i • a. r {s � N i • • s s • • uj �= rr t v v s • • e s B IL s _ fS f= cv N I l� 13 I*Q us � z F �� • � - iii, �t t. "xr� i ti:^ `_: J� 1 ID L.7 aos�so�ieoTiosoo' J' sP ttj ru loll \ /N ��—_ � � r .s =' ~� is � � '•� ` --- -�i .� _ � •. .1_...7..x.. ', `' —r TT C'IT'Y OF ITEM. - -. _, ANGA TITLE; PLANNINU impsm EXHINT. SCALE; 1'7 � 'I �j � � r \ �-- .ors -- a �� a — — • —t --- #••�ei•eie•e••e�J S 7-- tz is r' f 1 • y' I• 1 1 / L ._ — _L 1� _ C`T, ()F ITEM: Ana PLANNING DfN,ISIM EXHIBIT. SCALE FY RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REC"ENDING APPROVAL OF ETIWANUK SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -03 AMENDING FIGURE 5 -18 PERTAINING TO COMMUNITY TRAILS. A. Recitals. Etiwanda SpecifichPantyAmendmento88 -03, Cucamonga s described$inatheatitletofnth�s Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Specific Plan Amendment request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On July 13, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEMORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho ruc; *Manga as follows: 1. This Concussion hereby specifically finds that all of the farts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true ;.nd correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on July 13, 1988, including written and oral staff reports.: together with public testimony, this Commission hereby spec:. °ally finds as follows: (a) 7'he Community Trails recommended apply to properties located on the east and west sides of East Avenue, from a point ,aughly 1,400 feet north of Highland Avenue extending north to 24th Street as identified on ExhiFt "A" attached is part of this Resolution; an* (b) The Community Trails will provide necessary north /south links between existing and proposed Community Trails to implement the goals and objectives of the General Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commissioo hereby finds din: concludes as folaws: (a) That the subject property is suitable for,the uses permitted within the district in ter',s of access, size, and ,compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area; and PLANNING MISSION RESOLUTION NO. FSPA 88 -03 - City of Rancho Cucamonga July 13, 198E1 Page 2 2 (b) That the proposed Specific Plan Amendment W010 d not have significart impact on the enviro- ,,. -..:, nor the surrounding properties; and (c) That the proposed Specific Plan Amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. This Commission he"aby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in para;'raph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby resolves as follows: (a) That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby :- ecornmends approval on the 13th day of July 1588, Etiwanda Specific Ptah Amendment 88 -03. (b) The Plarr.'1 g Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Etiwanda Specific Plan amendment No. 88 -03. (c) That a Certified Cop-- of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Corsmissiort shall be forwarded to the City Council. 6. The b':outy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AM ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF JULY, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: l_am,y T. McNiM, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, ePu y core ary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary )f the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a �,pgular meeting of the Planning Commission Wield on the 13th day of July, 1988, by the following vote-to-wit: F/0 PLANNING C%,9sISSI09 RESOLUTION NO. ESPA 88 -03 - City of Rancho Cucautonga July 13, 1985 Page 3 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES. COMMISSIONERSc ABSENT: COMMISSIOV" RS: /i i f EXHIBIT A 0 0 • O s • ° • e • ® i e — • '�O° a •s•soss.•se ° � o •e e• • 0 • • a ••s• Aju A • I J � f Q • A :a Kill p fl O -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCABiONGA STAFF REPORT K r .z r DATE: duly 13, 198$ TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN G - ` amen en yo e n us r 17F TP .ec ff rc- an, expan rg ��e feral Industrial boundaries of Subarea 3 ) to include port, as of the area n^ south side of Arrow Route, between Hellman and Vineya _,-Currently located in Subarea 2 (General Industrial). Modification of permitted and condition911y permitted uses may also be considered. I. BACKC"'9UND: This is a request by the Planning Commission to consi er modifications to the land use provisions governing the south side of Arrow Route between Vineyard and Hallman Avenue4. The entire block is currently designated Subarea 2 (General Industrial), with focus on V -,I-related industrial uses in the entire subarea (tixhibit "D'; ). On February 24, 1989, the Planning Comission reviewed a request to allow additional non rail- related land use3, such as those permitted in adjacent Subarea 3 in the entire Subarea 2. Because this could have had the effect of diluting the ?0' -related activities within the entire 155 acre ',lock, the Commission opted not to modify the land use provisions o. the entire subarea at that time. II. PROPOSED AMENDMENT: This amendmert only involves a portion of Subarea •red y adjacent to Arrow Route and abutting residential development on the north, approximately 30 acres (Exhibit 11A"). The Otis Elevator plant site at the immediate corner of Vineyard and Arrow is not included in this amendment. As Proposed, the Amendment would expand the boundaries of Subarea 3 to extend along the south side of Arrow Route. The boundaries of Subarea 2 would be modified correspondingly (Exhibits "d" and "C "), j VII. ANALYSIS: Both Subarea 2 and Subarea 3 are designated General of n us r al; the differences between -',- *,ro are mostly in the range -limit eirmitted primary land uses ,to Where manuffcturing, service warehousing agand i ITEM r, l PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT R€ ISPA 88 -01 July 13, 1988 Page 2 support activities. Subarea 3, where there is no rail service Permits a broader range of activities, with greater emphasis on ' services. Exhibit E illustrates the differences. There are three basic issues which need to be addressed in light of the proposed changes: Rail Service: As proposed, the amendment would have minimal effect on existing and potential use of rail. The change would be confined to g Arrow Route and would not interfere with i the roil service potential of the remaining Subarea 2. An exception is the Otis Elevator site at the corner of Vineyard and Arrow, which has rail service. For this reason, this site is not proposed for change. Land Use Transitions: The north side of Arrow is developed in mu - am y an s ogle family residential uses. Bear Gulch neighborhood park is also located there. The propase change should provide a better trarodition between the residentfiki and industrial uses. The new provisions would allow a greater emniiasis on services and less on manufacturing. Subarea 3 development standards also require provisions for setbacks,, screening, buffering and other criteria neressar- to provide an appropriate transition to adjacent residential uses. General Plan: Both subareas are designated as General Industrial, as s e eneral Plan. The proposed charge is consistent with the General Plan. IV. ENVIROttMENTAL REVIEW: Staff has completed the Environmental m a u a tified no adverse environmental impacts which could result from this Amendment (Exhibit "F ")'.. The issuance of a Negative Declaration is therefore appropriate. V. CORRESPONDENCE: This items has been advertised in The Daily Report as a pu5TTc Wearing. Staff has also received a letter from Mr. Lynch of AVERY /Fasson (Exhibit "G ") opposing the original affecting the entire subarea. proposal 0 VI. RECOMMENDATION: The COMission should conduct a public hearing on this ma er. Staff recc:.ends approval of the attached Resolution recommending approval of this Amendmrnt and the issuance Negative Declaration. of a &7 -L I PL&NNING COMISSION STAFF REPORT RE ISPA 88 -0I July 13, 1988 Page 3 Res f ly su r d, 1 ra ul City P ner BB:OK :ko Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Area of Proposed ChIange Exhibit "B" - Subarea, Z;:(Proposed) Exhibit "C" Subarea 3 (Proposed) Exhibit "D" „ Subarea 2 (Existing) Exhibit "E°" Y- Land Use Tables Exhibit "F" Initial Study Exhibit "G" ' -" Letter from AVERY /Fasson Resolution Recommending Approval Draft Ordinance FIG. IV-4 ' CIRCULATION O O O 0 1 120' R.O.W. —M 100' R.O.W. R 88' or lose R.O.W. RAIL ICE SERV SERVICE T-� Existing - + + + +,t-- proposed TRALS /ROU ',!S O O O 0 Pedestrian ® ® 9 o BIoyf. e R Rte' Bridge Access Potnts t® be included in Subarea 3J 600""M Creeks & Channels `r pwkl Special Streetscape/ Laridseaping EXHIBIT A 0 400° 800 1600 The sfts shown may not be curt tote.' parcel lines and lot Configurations ration sits specm, TN depiction owned nor tF►� fk31ln only. kwftstlon of a M 136 oa a may is an are shown as approximation only. P�ojsetaei frlil�'e Hard that may be IV -22 adjusted over bane as the City devslops. FIG. IV -4 M7 1PRnDn-Q =n% CIRCULATION 120' R.O.W. 100' R.O.W. 83' or Isla R.O.W. E u 'RAILS /ROUTES O O O setssP tria. ��®.� ,Crooks A Channels ® ®® Bicycle RAIL SERVICE M c•. y Park' +-a"i -f-F- Existing �°°� l g* + + ++.t -. Proposed Special Strsatacapsi 4 Access Points Landscapielg 'do? ,IN EXHIBIT E o aoo' eoo' isoo' -5-' sl cation MMft 1hi be ldtlonof Owned nor is the iota: Parcel lines and lot confipwatkma da`OiCiion of a sit® la an are shown as approximation only. hfta§on of a pm*cW films �� may fas IV-22 adf6lsatil� IlYSr tittle at the City dovelopa. : us (A. 9c .co ot LU a f LIJ �m ; t- § i }_\ 1w EXHIBIT C ©.\ } � / e``� .��.Y \ 40 \ }{ \ } \ [ \ � . . .. • ■2 , < :| .� \ ^ \< IV-28' 2 LIJ �m ; t- § i }_\ 1w EXHIBIT C ©.\ FIG. IV-4 sub (FY1 -qTtnit - -1 C;RCULkTlON 0 n Q on 120` mom. MOMMMIN 100' R.QW. Oft=-mmml 88' or Ioss R.O.W. RAIL SERVICE Existing - + + ++-t -- toropossd �► Access Points 3 MWP"••'wm Creoka & Ghanncls m Psrk1 special Stmetbcaps/ Landscapes EXH IT D 0 400f 8001 1800 Note: Parcel lines and lot configurations ? 7 "c *m ft s my 1 e o gun sntR+ aysnad :ter is t(�s i�rsfiars slte a►3satcilC. The tion of a r7l0 Cs C'A are shown as cpPtOximation only, st d PM)Ocftd that may bo I V-22 s E over M Ctt2 e 0 n Q on + Skye,* �► Access Points 3 MWP"••'wm Creoka & Ghanncls m Psrk1 special Stmetbcaps/ Landscapes EXH IT D 0 400f 8001 1800 Note: Parcel lines and lot configurations ? 7 "c *m ft s my 1 e o gun sntR+ aysnad :ter is t(�s i�rsfiars slte a►3satcilC. The tion of a r7l0 Cs C'A are shown as cpPtOximation only, st d PM)Ocftd that may bo I V-22 s E over M Ctt2 e LAND USE COMPARISONS SUBAREA 2 SUBAP-c - 3 PERMIT7ED USES; Custom Manufacturing Custom Manufacturing Light Manufacturing Light Manufacturing Research Services - - Research Services Light Wholesa.ie, Storage and Public - Storage Distribution Light Wholesale, Storage and Distribution Medium Wholesale, St,.rage and Medium Wholesale, Storage and Distribution Distribution Agricultural /Nursery 5uppiias Agricultural /Nursery Supplies Automotive Rental /Leasing and Services Automotive /Light Truck Repair -Minor Eating and Drimcing Establishments Automotive /Truck Repair -Major Repair Services Building Contractor's Office and Yards Flood Control /Utility Corridor 4uilding Maintenance Services Building and Light Equipment Supplies and Sales Business Supply Rtztail Sales and Services Business Support Services Communication Services Eating and Drinking Establishments Laundry Services Administrative Civic Services Flood'COntrol /Utility Corridor CONDITIONAL USES; Medium Manufacturing Medium Manufacturing Public Storage Administrative and Office Automotive /Light Truck Repair -Minor Professional /Design Services Aut ,otive /Truck.Repair -Major Animal Care Building Contractor's Office & Yards Automoti e Fleet StoraaA Building /Light Equipment'Supplies Automotive S0vice�tAion and Sales Convenience Sales,,nd Services Business Support Services C Fast Food Sales. ` onvensence Sales and Services Financial,_��nsvrance and Real Estate Food and Beverage Sales tr 4os Heavy Equipment Sales and Rentals Food an'! .-ve'rage Sales Recreation Facilities heavy Equipment Sales and Rentals Public Safety and Utility Services Medical /Health Care Services Personal Services Recreation Facilities Repair Services Publiz - Assembly Public Safety and Utility Services Religious Assembly EXHIBIT F f CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PART II - INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DATE: �G `�, o . APPLICANT: FILZNG DATE: / ,,_LOG NMMER:_ PROJECT: 5, PROJECT LOCATION: , �V I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets). YES MAYBE NO 1. Soils and GeoloQV. Will the proposal hav_ Significant results iu: a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or burial of the soil? c- Change in topography or ground surface contour intervals? .0 d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any potential increase in wind or crater erosion of soils, affecting either on or off site cor,.ditons? f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? g• Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards o such as earthquakes, landslides, mud - slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? h. An increase in the rate of extraction and/or use _ of any mineral resource? /- . 2. H drolo . Will the proposal have significant results inn: r qi A(�tgrr a, :.hanger in currents, or the course of directi Of flowi g streams, rivers, or ephemeral struon . m b• Changes xx absorption rates, drainage patt or the race and amount of surface erns, Water runoff? c, Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any body of water? e. Discharge into surface Waters, or z alteration of f+ surtice stater quality? f. Alteration of groundxlter characteristics? g• Change in the quantity o" groucdwaters, either through direct additions or with - aquifer? or through interference with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? h. The reduction in the amount of water other wise available for public water supplies? i, Exposure of people ar Property to Water rtlated hazards such as flooding or seiches? 3, air Quality. results in; still the proposal have significant Page r YES u,AYBE �Q ~..- a, eonstanz or Periodic air emissions from mobile or indirect sources? Stationary sources? b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or' �►'" Interference with the attainment of applicable air quality standards? c. Alteration of local or regional climatic, conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? 4. 83o to `~ Flora, Will the proposal in ; have significant results a. Change in the characteristics of species, Including dive >%:.Aty, of any distribution, or number y species of plants? b. Reduction P0-� 7 the numbers of any unique, or endangej., B species of of anca? rare ?aee 3 YES `LaYBE ;ip C. Introduction of new or disruptive species of Plants into an area? d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural production? Fauna. Wi;,l the proposal'have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or numbers of any species oL animals? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c- Introduction of new or disruptive species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or C wildlife habitat? 5. population. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- butions density, diversity, or growth rate of the human population of an area? b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? _ 6. SOcia— Economic Factors, Will the proposal have significant results in: - a. Change in local or regional socio-economic characteristics, including economic or commercial diversity, tax rate, and values? property b. Will project costs s be equitably distributed among project benefietvies, i.e., buyers, tax payers or project users? '. Land lJse and plann na Considerations. Will the proposal have significant results in? _ a. A substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? _ b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, Policies, -+ or adopted plans of any governmental entities? c { C. M impact upon the qulait or Y quantity of ° ' existing consumptive or non - consumptive Page A YES 8. Transportation. ;lAF3£ NO Will the proposal Fsve significant results in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing streets, or .emand for new street construction ?' c. Effects on existing parking facilities, or do and for new parking? d. Substantial impact upon existing transporta- tion systems? e. Alterations to present patte_ns of circula- tion or movement of people and /or goods? _... f. Alterations to or effects on present anu potential water- borne, rail, mates ero,asit or air traffic? g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians: 9- Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. A-disturbance to the integrity of archaeological. paleontological, and/or historical esources? 19. Health. safety, and Nuisance Factors. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Creation of any health ha_ard or potential health hazard? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? _ c. A risk of explooion or release of hazardous substances in ths, event of an accident? d. An increase in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathanogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms? e. Increase in existing noise levels? f, Exposure of people to potentially dangerous noise levels? 9. The creation of objectionable odors'. _ h. An :, ncrease in light or glare? Gage S ll, in, Will the proposal have significant Y »S :'AYS» 1Vli res lts results. in: a, The obstruction or degradation of any sceni,, vista or visa? b, The creation of an aesthetically offensive site? C- A conflict with the ob; active of designated -. or potential scen!c corridors? 12, utilities a'r.3 public Services. "ill the proposa?. have a significant .-..' neea for new c,yatems. or alterations to tbp folio -sing: a. Electric powerZ b. Natural or packaeed gas? c. Communications systems? _,_._.. d, water supply? e- Wastewcter facilities? f, Flood control i$rz =tures? j ga Solid waste facilities? h, "Vire protection? i. Pollce protection? ..�.� J. Schools k. Farms or other recreatitiaal facilities? �. I- Maintenance of public facilities, including toads � � I and flood coptroi facilities? m, Other governmental services? �.... i 13. Ener¢v and 5carae RprauxcCS, �32Z the proposal have significant ca t ... res�uI s tt: JJJ a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? 1 b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy? c. An increase in the demand for development of nev Sources Of energy? �?13 ,r d. An Increase or perpetuation of the consumption Of nom - renewable forms of erer,� when feasible rentwab"k Sources of energy arm available? .:___��_,_- --------- 3 YES "Y9E 1iO e. Substantfal depletiQ4 of any nonrenewable nr scarce natural resource? e 14. Mandatory Findin s of St_gificanc'e. a. Does the project have the pptential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of or w11;!1ife species, cause a fish or wildlife poClUc tion to drop below self sustaining levels, thzeatcajtu eliminate a plant or aniaal community; reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant ox animal or elimi -late imporCent examples of the major periods of California_ history or'prehis -ory2 b. Does the project,have the potential, to achieve ' short -term, to PLia disadvantage of long -term, environmental =goals2 (A short -term impact on the envir�dnenr is one which occurs in a relatively brief, dtiinitive period of time while long- term impacts will endure well 1t;o the future). [ c. Doer the p „oject have impacts wii:ch are individually limited, but cumulatively LIU considerable? (Cumulatively considerable means that the iucremertal .effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed In-connection with the effects of past projects,, and probable future projects). d, Does the project have environmG--tal effects whicli will cause su!`stantial adveise effects o,i human beings, either directly or indirectly? + lI. DISCUSSION OF 'ENFIgQNMENTAL EVALUATION the above questiona plus a discussion of�proposid mit j�ationemeasures). Page 7 %I2. DETER<iI'� #`IIOY i On the basis of this initial evaluation. 2 find the proposed project COULD NOT have a_significant effect on the environment,.:ind a NEGATIVE DECLARATIG% will be prepared. LiI find that although the proposed :Project could have a eignifi!a:r effect an the environment, there Vill. not be a significant effect !< in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet haws been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PRZPO=. -'°� I find th& Proposed project f have a si g f L _,,,J envirnMent, and an ENVIBO; T` y�ACT RT is recta edd. on the k , 4 , Date _. S3gtlatur { i f f i Speclatty Ddvtston 9292 Ninth Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone 7149a7 -4631 May 23 1986 , NAY q, City of Rancho Cucamonga r 1�tf3 9320 C Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention: Brad Huller Dear Sir: We were asked a month ago, to support the changes requested by Messenger Investment Services to the zoning of subarea 2. While it is difficult not to sti ^-ort a felioa business person, we are not in favor of any zoning changes to subarea 2. We believe that Rancho Cucamonga needs more than small bu -iness and light industry employers to be n healthy and vital community. Mixing the businesses in subarea 2 will, in our opinion, cause us problems in the future in dealing with neighbors whose problems are so different from ours. To contest the statement no one in subarea 2 UL;es rail, I submit that in the years 1984 -1987, we received 126 rail cars. We are considering shipping by rail in 1969 to several of our distributian warehouses in the U.S. We have used the rail service and will continue to use it whenever it is economical to do so. Thomas J. sync Rant Manager AVERS /Passon Specialty Division TJL /jv I cc: Scott E. Peotter Messenger Investment Company 16912 -A Von Kerman Avenue Irvine, CA 92714 I I An Avon+ Camaanu r�-� RESOLUTION NO. A`.;SSOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION REC(JMriENDING APPROVAL OF INDUSTRIAL AREA ,,SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 8801 EXPANDING THE BOUNDARIES OF SUBAREA 3 (GENERAL INDUSTRIAL) TO INCLUDE PORTIONS OF THE AREA ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE, BETWEEN HELLMAN AND VINEYARD, CURRENTLY LOCATED IN SUSARE4�i 2 (GENERAL INDUSTRIAL) WHEREAS, on the 22nd Jay of June, 1988•, the Planning Commission initiated the above- described project; and WHEREAS, on the ,13th day of July, 1988, the FranningCOMIssidn field a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65864 of the California Government Code., SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the 'following fick.ings: 1. That the properties identified in Exhibit "A" are part of the Industrial Specific Plan. 2. That the subject property t> suitable for the uses Permitted in the Industrial' Specific Plan in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and 3. That the proposed subarea boundary will not have signtficant impact on the environment, nor the surrounding pr,,, rties•, antes 4. That the proposed change is in conformance with the General Plr±. SECTIPS 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this PrOSe_cf7iJMnot create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: I 1. That the Planning Commission, following a public hearing herd in the time and manner prescribed by law, hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 88 -01 as outlined in Exhibits "B° and "C". 2. That a Certified Copy of this Revolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning COMmission shall be forwarded to the City Council. i I OLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. HE: ISPA 88 -01 July 13„ 1988 Page 2 APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF JULY 1D88. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: arry e , Q01r7oan ATTEST: -BFQU vulirr. `I%pu cre ary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary,.of the Planning COnissipn of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, ai;d aJopted by the Planning'. Conxnission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a reguear meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of July, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONEAS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COiMISSIONERSs i I ORDINANCE ND. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CTYY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA, APPROMG INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN (I.S.P.) AMENDMENT 88 -01 EXPANDING THE BOUNDARIES 1-T SUBAREA 3 (GENERtL INDUSTRIAL] TO INCLUDOORTIONS OF Thy' AREA ON THE SOUTH S'!)E OF ARPk)41 ROUTE, BETWEEN HELL,MAN AND VINEYARD, CURRENTLY LOCATED IN SUBAREA 2 (GENr',a INOUSTRIAL) ordain as City :ouncil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does findings: SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council has made the following . I. That tho properties.identified in Exhibit "A" are ( part of the Industrial Specific Plan. The Planning COmission, following a public hearing, held in the time and manner prescribed by law recom- ended that F' the Cite Council approve and adopt Industrial Area I Specific Plan Amendment 88-01,-as outlined In Exhibits "B" and "CO; anus F 2. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the Industrial SWific Plan in terms of xrccess, size, and c �.. aapatibiti�.,,with existing land use in the surrounding area-,.and 3. That the proposed subarea boundary ajhange will not have significant impact on the envil�iment,_nor the surrounding properties; and 4. That the proposed change is in coofr,,mance with the General Plan. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby find; and certifies that the Project tins° ren reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Council hereby issues a Negative Declaration. SECTION 3: The City Council does hereby approve Industrial Specific Plan Amen- a�en�8M- , modifying the boundaries. of Subareas 2 and 3' in accordance with Exhibits "8" and "Cl. respectively. CITY COUNCIL ORDiNWX NO. RE: ISPA 88O1 Page 2 SECTION 4: The Mayor shalt sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause a same to be published within fifteen (25) days after its passage at least once in The Dailyy Report, a newspaper of general circulation Wjblished in the City of Ontario, California and - circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. r.-%F 13 N d, i r� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 13, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the P Inning Commission F, °.OM: Brad Butler, City Planner BY: Otto Kroutil, Deputy City ,Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPME11T CODE'AMENDNSNT 88 -06 amen ent to e ap er , o e ancho Cucamoaga Municipal Code establishing minimum required sizes for multi- family dwellings I. BACKGROUND: On three previous :occasiont the Planning Commission rev ewe a request by the City Council to establish minimms size requirements for multi - family dwellings. At the Nay 11, 1988 meeting, several possible alternatives were discussed. The Commission directed staff to develop an Ordinance establishing minimum size requirements, ranging from 550 to 950 square feet, depending on the type of unit. To avoid over - concentrations of :small units, staff was also directed to include a 35% limitation on the maximum ratio of studio and one bedroom units in each project. This report outlines the most recent proposal for the Commission's consideration and approval. PROPOSED RULTI- FAMILY UNIT SIZE REQUIREMENTS: Based on the Commission's diHection, the attached Ordinance would establish the following NEW minimum standards for all multi - family projects: UNIT TYPE: MIN. SIZE RE 'D MAX. NO. OF UNITS Efficiency /Studio 550 sq. ft. lop of total * One Bedroom 650 sq. ft. 35% of total * Two Bedroom 800 sq. ft. no limit Three Bedroom 450 sq. ft. no limit (or larger) *NOTE: The total number of efficiency and one bedroom units combined cannot exceed 35 %. y. ITEM H ( PLANNING C"ISSION STAFF REPORT RE: DCA �I,j -06 July 13, 4988 Page 2 Awk The Ordinance, as proposed, wo6z( also exempt projects dQStgned for senior citizens from these requir6ii; ets. II. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Staff has completed the enclosed Initial adverse result from this Amendment. Therefore ',nit,nnatissuancetofwaiNegative Declaration is recommended. - III. RECOMMENDATIhN: The Commissiion should conduct a public hearing and consi er �- pu c c-a:ents. Adoption of the attached Resolution, recommending approval of the Development Code Amendment to tihe City 'ed. Council is recomm.:: , y tt AResc BB :OK:ko Attachments: May 11, 1468 Planning Comission Staff Report with Attachments Initial Study, Part II Resolution of Approval Draft Ordinance l i I i i rl -l1 -- CITY OF RANCH I CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT VEPORi T .rv. DATE: May 11, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the PlaWn ig Commission FROM; Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Ito Kroutil, Deputy City Planner SUBJECT: MINIMUM UNIT SIZE FOR MULTI - FAMILY PROJECTS - City Council ni"itHvalred study To review r n mum size requirements for multi - family dwellings.. I: BACKGROUND: On two previcus occasions, the Planning Commissionl scusse a request by the City Council to review the lack of existing standards for minimum unit sizes in multi-family projects. On April 10, 1988, the Commission conducted a field tfip and reviewed actual projects in the City and in Orange County. The City Council directed that the Commission study and make recommendations in two areas: 1. Criteria for minimum unit size by unit type, i.e. { studios, one - bedroom, two - bedroom unita, etc., to Il .assure adequate living space in each type of dwelling; ind } 2. Criteria for an appropriate mix of units, to avoid overconcentration of smaller units in any one project. 1111 In addition, the Commission is also reviewing multi - family setback requirements far the Planned Communities (also on tonight's agenda as a separate but related topic). II. ANALYSIS, Tile attached floor plans and tables (Exhibits "A" roug G ") illustrate the dwellings reviewed by the Commission during the April field trip. Many of the dwellings were relatively large, and in staff's view, quite adequate for their purpose. At issue are the smaller units and the question the Commission has to address is partly a matter of subjective judgement: At which point &Is a owelling become inadequate due to limited floor space for that particular type of ur I The tour included a 525 square foot "junior" one - bedroom unit by the Wiil ;am Lyon Comparty, designed for one adult. In actuality, this is an efficiency unit with a bedroom area that can either be closed off or opened tip for a more spacious feelin,, This was a well thovght out design, given the very limited floor area. PLANNING commissro- STAFF REPORT MINIMUM UNIT SIZE - AULTI-FAMILY May 11, 1988 Page 2 Another smaller uni" z,on the tour was a more traditional 619 square foot one - bedroom unit in Terra Vista. This unit would typically be i-*,-tended for occupancy by one or two persons (Exhibit "A!). Virtually Identical, except for an additional bedroom, was an 811 square foot two-bedroomunit, typically occupied by two adults with or without a child (Ex " bit bit "B"). With all the units, the number of persons actually living in each dwellinR is not regulated by Buildiiiq Code or other City codes. In apartment complexes the number of persons in each dwelling is controlled by the management, and ownership units such as condominiums, there are generally no controls at all. (Please note this is no different from single family residences. The only regulations which may affect occupancy in any dwelling are health and public safety codes). The' result of this' is that the choice of unit type fnr the renter or buyer is very much a private matter; in the rental and and entry level housing market, people generally tend to rent or buy the largest dwelling they can .afford, regardless, of the intended occupancy of the dwelling. III. ALTERNATIVES, Based on past discussions, City Council direction, and revre—wof field conditions, it would appear that some standards may be necessary to meet the City's goals, Staff suggests that the City's development regulations be modified to include minimun unit size requirarents as well as orovi_-;'�3os to avoid large proportion of smaller types. The 1�qllowinq alternatives are suggested for discussion purpozes only: JNIT SIZE ALTERNAT�YE--* Unit Type A 8 C Efficiency/Studio 500 550 600 One Bedroom 600 650 - 700 Two Bedroom 750 800 850 Three 0droom 900 960 1000 (Or Larper) Please note: 1) Senlar projects should be exempted frorn minimum size reqairements. 2` 1000 square feet is the recenly, established minimum for single family dwellingt,,-k D PLANNI`V: COMMISSIO°` ,STAFF REPORT MINIMUM UNIT SIZE AULTI- FAMILY May 11, 198- Page $ UNIT MIX CRITERIA To assure that smaller units are- not I c�rr:en'3 iri any:ne area or project, staff would suggest that a percentage For discussion purposes. the follows go limitations are suggested: Unit Type Efficiency /Studio (maximum number of units): 10 percent One Bedroom (maximum number of units): 25 percolt IV. RECOMENDATION: Staff is requesting initial direction. from the ann ng M- scion, with the intention of scheduling public hearings on the potential amendments `-,the Development Code in the near future. Res lly s itted Bra City P annex BB;OK :te Attachments: Exhibits "A" through "G" – Floor Plans and Size Tables I _ j PARKVIEWPLACE 1 B%-�drocmh Batt 619 80A. $495.Q.0- -Nel a a rE: �i EN TFRY 'WALK—IN IV CLOSET c .MASTER SUITE 9 DRESSING r BATH i °I E• °`TRY r— j 'WALK—IN CLOS lu 0 t,RESS11+3G � L FA AREA 'h BATH 05 i S �lTCQlEby;, IDW 00 AMU MASTER S' JIrI 2 LIVING ROOM) DINiNC PATIO G i LINE OF BALCONY AEOVE SYCAMICRE TIE"ACE 7 uSB0r Bedroa1n02 Bath 1019 S+l.ft. TERRA VISTA MULTIFAMILY `PROJECTS: SUMMARY OF UNIT TYPES,, S12ES, AN0 PROJECT AMENITIES r COMPLETED PROJECTS NO TYPE sO.FO, AMENIT =ES j l TR 12402 - Parkview Place 1152 tinitj) � 32 40 Efficiency 475 Barbecue area. Iaundry, 40 1- BR /1 -aA a- BR /e--9A 619 room, pool, pets, spa, 4) 2- MBR /2 -BA all 885 tennis courts (2) ` TR 12365 - Mountainviewat Terra Uis 1270 unitsi 68 68 e- BR /1^-SA -BA 755 Barbecue areas (3), 67 2- BR /2 all laundry rooms (3'), - 67 2 -BR /2 I /3 -BA TH -HR 97i5 poo15 f 1, spa 3 /2 1 /2 -BA 7H 1,268 T4 1267 S camore Terrace (128 units) 49 40 1- BR /1-SA 668 Barbecue area, attached ' +0 2- BR/R -BA 2- MER /e-SA eye garages, laundry room, 1,019 pool, spa, weight r4on, TR 12673 - Everoreen (89? units) 76- 7? R /l -DA 619 Barbecue areas (S), 68 L- BR /1-2A 755 basketpall court, 108 2- SR /2 -BA all individual washers and 11 2- MSR /2 -en -BR 865 dryers fin some unit, >, 58 2 /2 I /2 -$A TH 935 laundry rooms (2), 3 -8R /2 1/2 BA TH 1,166 pools (S), spas (7), tot lots (4), volley- ball court fiUTURE PROJECTS CPLANN,'N6 COMMISSION PPPROVALS' NO TYPE SQ.FT., AMENIT, E5 TR 13270 - Hi St.Ie (04 units) 152 16 1- SR /1 -SA 2-BR /2 -SA 700 Individual washers and 64 2- BR /2 -BA 967 974 dryers in all units, 96 2-MBR /e -BA 1,053 pools (2), recreation b:)ilding, 56 3- FR /2 -BA 1,177 spas (3), t�lnnls courts FUTURE PROJECT!3s (PLANNING COMMISSIQP4 pPPRt7VALS) - continued NO- TYPE SOFT. AMENITIES TO 13273 - Executive it (256 uniLS) 80 00 1-SR /1 -SA 682•, Barbei:ue areas, 96 2- BR /2 -BA 898 individual washers and 2- MBR /2 -BA 1,037 r dryer,),5 in all units, Pool recreation building, shade structures (3), spas l5 >,. Port court, tot lut r FUTURE PROJECTS NO. TYPE SQ.FT. AMENITIES TR 13717 (412 units) 2- SR /2--BA 959 Garages, individual 2 -BR /2 1/2 BA 1,100 washers and dryers jit 3-BR /2 -BA 1,070 all units, gaols (2), 3 -BR /2 1 /e -BA 1,250 recrea=tion bLtii.ding, 3 -BR /2 1 /2 -BA 1,350 spas (2), tot lots t3), 3 -BR /2 1 /2 -BA 2,410 wading peal TF? 13272 ( 240 units) 54 102 2- SR /2 -BA -BA 851 Barbecue areas, 84 2- BR /2 3- BR /2 918 individual. washers and -BA 1,109 dryers ((,n some units), :P0010 rq;:rention building, shade structure, 'spas, (2), sport court, tat lot I CKF:cJc /diy799b Ci RRR 4m cc co 10 cc 71 tn cps O O KrrCHEN- DINING THE SILVERADO gprH °`k ROOM PlanA one, Wroo1711 «a16 atth 766 S$usf" Fast y,vu�tG An expansive [Wing room with a separate dining area interior design, The impressive ROOM MASTER highligh!S this open -styie master bedroom suite boasts a large wa:k -3n cios+.t BEDROOM with mirrored vrardr;be dcors. PAMO r n �`s TFM SADDLEBACK Plan C 'iwo sedre mailwa oaths 882 Stare Fftt Two spacious master bedroom suites, troth with vaulted ceilings and one with a unique flay window, make a bold interior design . statement that will please the most discriminating resident's taste. VD (V"TWCULV4 [ KrrCtT.r„r3 MASTER 1VIASM YdVLNC. BEDROOM BE Ni ROOM rvunTTncuuNGI 1a+=c==j (VAMMCEQM ENTRY DECK a J I Flax F Two BodronmwTwa oaths 1,a Square Pmt The irnaginatively- designed bay window dining area open$ to a spacious living room and cozy firoptace. This plan also 4icludes two impressive maste+ kAdroorn suites, each with i +s own prlate ',- :,% EA C 111-1 CITY DF R-0CHO CUCAMONGA PART II - INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DATE: -7 APPLICANT: -1!14- FILING DATE: LGG NUMBER: PROJECT LOCATION:`ej�17 I. E*11R0NMN`rP-1 IMPACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets). 1. Soils and Geolo4v. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes 'n geologic relationships? o. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or burial of the soil? C* Change in topography or ground surface contour inrarvals? d. afiae destruction, covering or modification of any unique v0 logic or physical features? e. Any potential increase in wind or water erosion of $oils, affecting Fitter on or off sit, conditons f.. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? g• Exposure of penple or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslidesG mud slides, ground failure, or 31milar hazards! F�. An increase in the Tate of extraction and /or' use of any mlnz--al resource? 2. Hydrol. Will the proposal have aignificanc results in: _ C7" l YES Muz. NO y Page 2 4. mota Fl_ ora. Will the proposal have significant results 1s. a. Chang; in the characteristics of species, Including diversity, distribution, or number Of any species of plant$ b. Reductior, of tht numbers .. of any unique, rare or eodanvero4 Q. �,.,4.._ = j . - - - r L YES :"APSE \0 a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral stream channels? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the 7< rate and amount of surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change it the amount of surface water in any body of wat < ,tr? e. Discharge into surface waters, or any alteration of surface water quality? f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? V S. Change in the quantity of groundwaters, either through direct additions oa with- drawals, or through intnrferencr with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? •r _- h. The reduction in the amount of water otbar- wise availat•le f;.r public water supplies? I. Exposure of people or property to water relatid hazards such iFs flooding or 1 seiches? 3. Air_ Quality, Will the proposal have significant results int a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile or indirect sources? Statlosary sources? ---- b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or Interference with the attainment of applicable air quality standards? c. Alteration of local or regional climati.: conditions, affecting air movement,.m¢ilture or temperature? 4. mota Fl_ ora. Will the proposal have significant results 1s. a. Chang; in the characteristics of species, Including diversity, distribution, or number Of any species of plant$ b. Reductior, of tht numbers .. of any unique, rare or eodanvero4 Q. �,.,4.._ = j . - - - r L ?age 3 YESYB° `0 c. Introduction of new or disruptive spa—ies of plants into an urea? ?` d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural production? Fauna. Will the prD ;,,sal have significant results in: a. Change in the characterisri,.,t of species, including diversity, distribution, or numbers of any species of animals? b. Reduction of thi:R numbers of any unioue, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of animals into an area, or result to a barrier to zhe migration or wi vement of a,fimnls? d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or wildlife habitat? 5, pO ration. Will the proposal have significant — results in: a. Will the proposal alw..r the loca4an, distri- bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of the human population of an area? b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 6. So %ozie Factors. Will the propcsal 'hare significant results inn ' a. Change in local or regional soeio-ecvn %ic characleristica, including economic tr commercial d',•ersity, 'tax rate, and property values? b. Will project costs be equitably distributed among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tax payers or project users? 7. Land. Usa and plar.hina Considerations. Will the -° proposal have signifi� results in? a. A substantial alteration of the present or planned land usP of an area? 000- b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, Policies. or adopted plans of any governmental C. An irnnzct upoO the qulaity or quantity of e« 3 CO�5'4npfiive or non - consumptive ren ^r' '�fnnatr�R�m.. «•....cne__.. Page 4 YES MAYBE lqC) A. Ion. R_soortat4 Tran Will the proposal have resultT— in proposal significant a. Genoration of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing streets, or de mazd for new street construction? c- Effects On 4xiating parking facilitiesi or demand for rS-v parking? d- Substantial impact upon existing transporta- tion systems? e. Alterationg to present patterns of circula- tion or movement of people and/or goods? f. Alterations to or effects on presan atd Potential water-borne, rail, mass transit or air traffic? 9. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 9- Cultural Resources Will the proposal have Resources. 'r ts in: a. A dimrbance to he integrity o: archaeological, PaleontOlogical, and/or historical resources? Health. safary .--i Nuisance Factors. Will the 7_ rF-ba-L have significant results zn--. a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? b. Exposure of people to Potential health hazards? c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substznces in the event of an accident? d. An increase In the number of individuals Or species of vector or pathenogenit organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms? e. Increase in existing 110ise levels? f. Exposure of people to Potentially deugerous, noise levels? 9. The creation of objectionable oiars? h. An Increase trj_ fight or glare? Page S YES Ltl3E Ya �r 4 7� �.��' 11. sip Aesthetics. Will the proposal have results in: p p nnificant a. The obstructiGn or degradation of any scenic vista or view? b. The creat.:in t f an aeathetically offensive site? c. 41 conflict with the :objective of designated or potential sceni:v corridors? 12• 'Lllities and Public Service,, Will the proposal have a significant need for new systems, or alterations to the following: a. Electric power? ` b. Netural or packaged gas: C. Cotmunicat#lons systems? fd. I Water supply? e. Vastewater facilities? j f. Flood control structures? $, Solid waste facilities? h. Fire protection? i. Police Protection? j� SchOO1S7 k, Parka or other recreational facilities? 1. lssintenance of Public facilities, including roads and flood control facilities? m, Other governmental services? 33. Enerey and Scarce Aesources. Will the proposal have :significant results a. Use of substantial or Wcessive fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy? - c. An increase in the demand for developmen *-* of new sources of energy ?11�� d. An increase. or p er pet u�I /In of the consumption of non - renewable fOrals of energy, when feasible fienewablet sgktxces of lner_gy_ are. 2va4ini,i.* Page S YES Ltl3E Ya �r 4 7� �.��' Page b YES !WBE 110 e. Substautzlgl dwttetton of any nonraz,ewabYe os scarce natural :e;sourg, 14. Mandato Findin s of Si aificancb, ~�~ a. the the project have the potentir,I L� degrade the quality of -the environment, ;'adstz degrade 'reducE the habitat of fiah or dli a ttalles, cause a fish or wildlife popjlatikin to ,drop below self sustainwng leveyy� threw ten tto eliminate a plant or anff,l commu Gty, eriuce the number or restrict t,re range 4f a riire or endangered plant or lan$Atal or_- �-j4 -4z . , Important eyamples of the msjor'period*: of California history or pre?,israry? �✓ --,• _L b. Does the project have the prential to achieve short -term., to the di„advaatage of long- term, environmental gosla? LA short_tarm imPW; on the er"vlronZent is onet, Which ocrurz in a re;,.tively brief, definitive period of time`vhile longer { Berta impacts will endure well into the future). c. Does the -- Voject have impacts which are individually limited, but +CUmulatively co.isiderable? (Cumu;ativclx considerable msans that the incremearta? xzf ;cts of ,Ara individual project ark cgr�61&rahle "Mq vievf%4 in com,ection with tht ef4eo of past projerL: and }probable future project_,,, �.' d'• ' • 3 the project have eravironm4nteY, effects V, -,:ch will cafAse substantial adverse effe"s on human beings, either directly or indirectly? 1S. DISCUSSION OF - JRDNMMNTAL EVALG'AkIbN the above i(i•e•, Of affirmative ans. *ers to Q!'�stioris plus a discus "'On of proposed ttitlVtion measuresj; 0701 -02 o 7-13--88 PG agenda Paee 7 III. LE2E ?�fZNATION On tae basis of this`','initial evaluation: I find the proposed project COULD-NOT have a signifiaapt effect on the envivo=ant, and a.NEGATIG6 DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have as significant effect an the environment„ fihere will not be a significant effect In t%is case because the mitigation measnres descrioed on an attaehed sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL DE PREPARED. j'--� 2 .find the proposed project MAY hairs a sign is t e °t on the L_ J envirnmant, and an ENVIRONMT L�61,1 m 12£P . T is req ed. Date / t, SignatLre Title -- i is i � _ M RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO TITLE 17, CHAPTER 17.08, OF THE PANCh1, CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH MINIMUM REQUIREC, SIZES FOR MULTI - FAMILY DWELLINGS WHEREAS, on the 13tt day of duly, 1988, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65864 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rar,:ho Cucamonga Piansting Commfssion has found that this Amen .en not create a significant adverse effect on the environment and recommends to the City Council the issuance of a Negative Declaration on , 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Ser:ion 66650 to 65555 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of this Amendment. F. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council apps °:eve this Amendment to the Municipal Code ner the al,tiched Orjinance. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF JULY, 1988. PLANNING C"ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, a roan ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary i I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning' Commission Of the City or Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of July, 1948, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CIDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 17, CHAPTER 17,08, OF THE RANCHO CUCAt1Oi9A MUNIr'PAL CODE ESTABLISHING MINIMUM REQUIRED SIZES FOR MULTI- FAMILY DWELLINGS WHEREAS, on the th day of 1988, the City Council held a duly noticed public — hearing pursuan o action 65864 of the California Government Code, follows: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as SECTION 1: Section 17.08.0406, Minimum Dwelling Unit Size-, is anended to read as follows: YL L LM N 14H H Kinimm Dwelling Unit Sizei Single family attached and detached dwellings 1,000 sq. - h regardless of district Multiple family dwellings - - One bedroom Efficiency /Studio 550 sq. ft, regardless of district - Two bedroom 650 sq. ft. regardless of district - Three or more bedrooms 950 sq. ft, regardless of district hA single family dwelling less than 1,000 sq• ft. may be authorized when a development exhibits innovative qualities in tract, plow and architectural design through the approval of a Conditional Use permit. iSenior citizen projects are exempted f.im this requircuoent. 3To assure that smaller units are not concentrated in any one area or project, the following percentage limitations of the total number of units shall apply: 10 percent for Efficiency /Studio and 35 percent for One Bedroom or up to 35 percent combined. SECTION 2: Section 17.08,0401; ,Minimum Dwelling Unit Size, is amended to rea as follows: CITY COUNCIL :DRDINANCE no. RE: DCA 88--06 Page 2 L LM M KV N Minimum Dwelling Unit Sizeh Singh family attached and detached dwellings 1,000 sq.ft.g regardless of district Multipl¢ family dwellings:i Efficiency /Studio HIR 550 sq. ft. regtr•dless of district - One bedroom N/R 550 sq. ft. regardless of district. - Two bedroom, N/R 800 sq, ft. regardless of district - Three or more bedrooms N/R 950 sq. ft. regardless of district; 3A single family dwelling less than 1,,000 sq. -ft. may be authorized when a developnient exhibits innovative qualities in tract, plot and architectural design through the approval or' a Conditional Use Permit. hSenia citizen pf!, ects are exempted from minimumi mit sizes, iTo assure that smaller nits are not concentrated�i3 any one area or project, the following percentage limitations of the total raMber ixf units shall apply: 10 percent for Efficiency /Studio, aid 35 percent for One Bedroom, or up to 35 percent combined. j f{ 1 I i .4 K] CITY OF RANCHO CUCATMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 13, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Tom Grahn, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: EKVT',dNMENTAL ASSESSMEW AND CONDITIQ,y_AL USE PERMIT 88 -26 reques tv asta5lish a beauty �ar;or in a ]eased space of 1,69.1 square feet within an existing Industrial Park im, the General Industrial District (Subarea 4) located at the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Seventh Street -`APN: 209- 211 -48. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: & Anion Re nested: Revi -,m of' a Conditional Use Permit for a beams parlor. B. Surroonding LAnd Use and zoning: North Vacant; General Industrial (Subareas 4 and 5) Scith - Industrial Park; General Industrial (Subareas 4 and East - Industrial Park; General Iadustrial (Subarea 6) West - Low Residential, vacant; Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre), General Industrial (Subarea 4) C. General Plan Designations: Project tie'— uenera n ustrial North General Industrial South General Industrial East - General Industrial West - Low Residential D. Site Characteristics': The project site is located within a fully develop-eff—m-UTMenant industrial complex. E. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Re ui-eed Provided eau y' P a r I or T,T- _3 per --7--- each beautician station l l ITEM I ® i PLANNING COMMISSION STIFF REPORT EMPIRE HAIR DESIGN - CUP 88 -26 July 13, 1988 Page 2 F. :pRl1,cab'1,e _ Regulations: The Industrial Ana Specific Plan erm eau y par ors as Convenience Sales end Services within he neal Industrial District (Subarea 4), subject to a Conditional Use Permit. II. ANALYSIS: A. General; The applicant is nroposing to occupy 1,641 square THTW tenant space within Building Two of the Scheu Business Center. The facility will have a total of eight beautician stations with day, evening, and weekend hours. Business hours will be 9:OC A.M. to 7:00 P.M., Tuesday through Saturday. There will be a total of eight beautician stations, seven for hair- cutting and .one for make -up. The hair- cutting stations will have staggered hours, tWo will be used daring the day, four during the evening, and possibly all eight on Saturday. Each beautician typically works a four day work week and is assigned to a specific station. One operator only is assigned to a station; hence, the station is to use only during that operators hours. The bezuticians work on a commission basis which tends to favor eve -wing and weekend customers. The beauty parlor will take in customers primarily on an appointment basis with approximately two customers per hour. In assessing the availability of parking, a discrepancy was noted between the number of parking spaces required versus the number parking spaces provided, Building Two was parked to office standards at a ratio of one parking space per each 250 square feet of gross floor area. The proposed beauty parlor required three parking spaces per each beautician station, or a total of twenty -four spares, leaving a discrepancy of seventeen parking spaces as the subject site has seven parking spaces available (1,691 square feet /250). However, in this particular situation it would seem that the Code standard is excessive given the nature of the business operation as a "low- volume" store. Due to concern with the parking discrepancy a condition has been included in the Resolution to mitigate potential parking problems: a maximum of two beautician stations may be used during the hours of 9:00 A.M. to 5..00 P.M., Tuesday through Friday, utilizing only six of the seven parking spaces designated for this tenant suite during normal business hours. Ll B. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been Mika Completed by The applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist and has found no significant impacts on the environment as a result of this project. PLANiiIRO COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EMPIRE HAIR DESIGN -,,CUP 88 -26 July 13, 1988 Page 3 III. FACtS FOR FINDINGS: In order to approve this Conditional Use Ve-Ain a omn ss on must make the following fin0in9s: 1. That the proposed use is in accordance with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the Industrial• Area Specific Plan Subarea in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed use will not be detrimental to the Public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. Id. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing I, i eh` -'iho a� y Rye o__r_t newspaper, the property posted, and notices sent7o iii prape— ray owners within a 30 font radius of the project site. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recoomnds that the Commission hold a public e�-r g' ' i' Of item. If, after considering public comments, the required findings can be made, adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval and issuance of 'a Negative Declaration would be appropriate, A Resolution of Denial has also been included should the Cmamission not be able to justify the required findings, rtes ully su itted, /ad Bu a Ci , anne BB :TG:mlg Attachments: better from Applicant Exhibit "A" - Location Flap Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Floor Plait Resolution of Approval Resolution of Denial May 31,1988 j Dear Sirar The proposed business, Empire Hair Design, wir1 provide services to our clients as follows. Hair cuts, hair styling, permanent w&"%, hair color, nail care, facials, aid miss beauty services. We also will be supplying beauty products to our customers. The hours of operation will be Monday though Saterday from gam to `TPi- There will �)e at the largest shirt eight employees. The reason for requesting this c.u.p. is the good location and desirable size of the building. We also feel we can provide a service to tine business people and rosidents of the area. , V Xi Z ! - 4T[A,a Wendell Jay Bays I r NORTH i ITY OF IT RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITTLE: PLANNING DIVISION _ S EXHHBIT: -. .� SCALE:, 1 - I ' � ou1ENU tlOUlTML IMUS tNWlTMAL w.maaw,x M STREET r= �- - - -- ---- r iK.4, Kam QL00. LQQ. WTNh J1 , nouslrta W.TI -TOWWr I WMSTMAL ,pJI '"TI -HUNT MILTH IwArA MmuBT�uL t S AI. •WLTI•iNANT i MUMPAL MULTI- TENANT NOUSTRL4 fm OMPAL OMITN AL , e NORTH i ITY OF IT RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITTLE: PLANNING DIVISION _ S EXHHBIT: -. .� SCALE:, 1 A 801 . A 803 A BU L B 803, lot 7i--- $07 i--m! so$: -- I B A Oil A 812 A A $14 ARCHIBALD AVE. C "2 "2 1.680 fC 903 B 1,280 �� 2,664 fi D 2176 A .-D 904 E 2,960 Cvm erclal Units W 0125 Archibald > 9125 Archibald UNIT —19. —,Fr 20 %201'-20- 021 C -007 A 1,3226 B 1,182 ZI c C 1,073 i A 11B A D D 2,954 1,605 E 909 [14_ E F 1,782 G 1,200 9135 Archibald 7j H 1,200 1 1,182 20,:201:24, : I W120 913SArchibald L—L--gj UNIT SO, FT. 3 c E A F i A 1,342 B 1,440 C D 1,691 E 1,418 F duo iiiLiLLLn im Wo L cr II 0. 1 D INDUSTRIAL TRIA L UNITS .901 A Sol � ly TYPE l-. F A 801 . A 803 A BU L B 803, lot 7i--- $07 i--m! so$: -- I B A Oil A 812 A A $14 C "2 "2 1.680 fC 903 B 1,280 C 2,664 D 2176 A .-D 904 E 2,960 W AD 905 > C -007 ZI II i LEASED E 909 A 801 . A 803 A BU L B 803, lot 7i--- $07 i--m! so$: -- I B A Oil A 812 A A $14 A 1.680 B 1,280 C 2,664 D 2176 E 2,960 W ZI LEASED El rq ,,G sr��.;tif 9lss -p II Awl In 4 K O O J� w �yff d ITEM; - GCo TITLE: EXHIBIT: LE:- NORTH RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88 -25 FOR BEAUTY PARLOR IN THE SCHEU BUSINESS CENTER LOCATED AT 9135 ARCHIBALD AVENU' , SUITE 0, IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, SUBAREA 4 - APN 209- 211_48 A. Recitals, (i) Empire Hair Design has filed an application for the issuance of the Conditions Use Permit No. 88_26 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application ", (ii1 On the 13th of July, 1488, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal r' _-requisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. S. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows. 1. This Commission hereby specifically finub. that all of the f;ct set forth 0 the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on Jelly 13, 1988, including written and oral staff raports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: .7 The application applies to property located at 9135 I Archibald A.,nme, Suite D, within a fully developed nmul'titenant industrial complex; and (b) The applicant is proposing a beauty parlor with a total of eight beautician stations with day, evening and weekend hours; and (c) The subject property was developed to allow office type tenants and parked accordingly. Suite "D" has seven parking spaces available, and (d) The Development Code r_squires a parking ratio of three spaces per each beautician station, based Dn that ratio twenty -four parking spaces are required; and (e) The applicant, proposes 8 beautician stations R fcr hair cutting and 1 for make-up). One operator will be assigned to a station; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 88 -26 - EMPIRE NAiP DESIGN July 13, 1988 Page 2 (f) The beautician operators will have staggered hours, with only 2 sCa,�ions in use during day time (business) hours and four during evening (after business) how,,, in weekdays; and (g) Customers will primarily be by appointment with approximately . to 2 customers per station per hour in operation. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented'tj this Commission. during the above - referenced public hearing and upor, the specific fi dingy of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together with tk- conditions applicable thereto, will not be detriw.ental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has is been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act -of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative ileclaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth n paragraph each 2 and and 3everyy, con condition forth bbelow and in the t application' att ched subject Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. (1) Any n<odification, expansion, or other change in operation will require a revision to the Conditional Use Permit. (2) Approval of this request shall not waiive compliance with ail sections of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, and all other City Ordinances. (3) If the operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or operations, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before tfe Planning Commission for the consideration and possible termination of the use. (4) Occupancy of the facility shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code e"nii'State Fire Marshall's regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy,* plans shall be submitted to the Foothill Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show I PLANNING COMISSION RES04VTION NO. CUP 88 -26 EMPIRE HAIR DESIGN July 13, 1988 Page 3 compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. (5) Any signs proposed for the facility shall be design4d in conformance with the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance, any. Uniform Sign Program for the complex, and shall req��iri review and approval by the Planning Division prior; to installation. _ (6) This Conditional Use Permit is approved for a maximum of eight beautician stations with a maximum of two beautician stations operational miring the hours of 9 :00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M., Tuesday through Friday. All eight beautician stations may 'rye used during evening hours, after 5 P.M., and on Saturdays. 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this ResolwabR. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF JULY, 1958 PLANAING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO WCAMONGA 8Y: Larry T. e , airman ATTEST: l)-rad gM er Deputy Secretary I, Brad Buller, deputy Secretary of the Planbaing Division of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of July, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONfzaS: NOES: C"ISSIONERS-, ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO C'JCAMON �OAA PLANNING COMISSION DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ti0. 88-26 FOR BEAUTY PARLOR IN THE SCHEU BUSINESS CENTER LOCATED AT 9135 ARCHIBALD AVENUE, SUITE a, ICI THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTf?ICT, SUBAREA 4 - APN: 209- 211 -48 A. Recitals. M Empire Hair Design has filed ran application for the issua:+ce of the Conditional Use Permit No. 88 -26 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On the 13th of July, 1988, the Planning Comrlssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. .iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. Auk qr NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission Of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows; 1. ' This Com,7ission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recit,' , Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented W t9}is Cc�mission during the above - referenced public hearing on July 13, 1988, including written and oral sta;f reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereeby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 9135 Archibald Avenue, Suite D, within a fully deveicaed multitenant industrial complex; and (b) The applicant is proposing a beauty parlor with a total of eight oeautician stations with day, evening and weekend hours; and subject property developed letenants and parked accordingy Sl "D has sevenp akin g allow P aces &Vailab; and (d) The Devalopment Cope requires a parking ratio of three spaces, per each beautician station, based. on that ratio tw' Ay -four parking spaces are required, creating a deficiency of seventeen parking spaces. 3. Based during the above.. efe.renc de psubstantial bl earing and cupon the specific Commission .L�f PLC W-UG COMMISSION RESOLUTIOU NO. CUP 88 -26 - EMPIRE HAIR DESIGA July 13, 1988 Page 2 facts set forth in paragraph l and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds an,+ co,;cludes aS fellows: (a) That the proposed use is not in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, togeth^- with the conditions applicable thereto, =11 be detrimental to the public health, safe:.y, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or imtrova„Rrts +« the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use does not comply wit" etch of the appl`icabie provisions of the Development Code. been reviewed abed considered ed i7nrcomplian a certifies that ~hEnvironme;ital Quality Act of !J30 and, further, this Commission hereby .es a Negative Decla�•.tian. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subjec,. to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. ``' Dr-ety Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of 01V 42tion. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF JULY, 1988 PLANNING COMMISSION bF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. c -eT, ai 1 rman -- ATTcST: raa u er;'Uepu y Secretary I, Brad Buller, Veouty Secretary of the Planning Division of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resoultion was duly and regularly adopted GCityofancho Cucamonga, at passed, regular meeting of hePlani g omis: in held nn the 13th day of July, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: —� LA moor.-Mol CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE:. July 13, 1988 P-1 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Gomission Fkui,. Brad Buller, City 'Planner BY: Brett Horner, Assistant Plan. ,r SUBiECT, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ARID CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88 -27 -- ?-MY CHrk' F request -request establish a c roprac is c �n�e �n a eased space m' 1,3 4- ipajre fi t within an e..1sting Industrial park In the General Industrial Dictrict (Subarea 4) located at 9125 Archibald Avenue, Unit A - iAPN: 209 - 211 -48 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPi'ION, A. Action Requested: Approval of a non- construction Conditional US--e Permit to establish; a chiropractic clinic within an existing multi - tenant commercial center (Scheu Business Center) located at 91<L Archiaald, Suite A. a. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Vacant, General Industrial (Subarea 4) South - Industrial /Commercial buildings,, General Industrial (Subarea 4) East Industrial buildings; General Industrial (Subarea 4) West - Single family residential: .ow Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) C. General Plan Designations: project ite General Industrial North - General Industrial South General Industrial East - General Inc, - strial West - Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) D. Site Characteristics: The site is comprises" of two buildings, par$-3T"a - -m-LA - FAan`t commercial center. Seven (7) of the 15 suites are currently vacant. The businesses operating within the center include various support services (an office supply store, a personnel "service, a business machine outlet, a mailbox service) and a daii. ITEM i , PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 88 -27 - PERRY CHIROPRACTIC CLINIC July 13, 1988 Page 2 E. Parking Calculations: Number of !Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Faotage Ratio Required Provided Proposed Chiropractic Clinic 1,326 1/200 7' 7 Deli 1,200 1/100 1.2 12 Vacant 19,197 1/250 77 77 TOTALS 96 101 F. A olir.,olc 4'ojulations: The Industrial Area Specific plan u.,area perm s €cal /Health Care Seryice uses subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission. 11. ANALYSIS: A. General: The proposed chiropractic clinic will operate Monday Wong Friday from 0:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. (see Exhibit "All). The clinic will offer physical therapy and will have x -ray facilities. B. Issut,s• parking availability and the clinic's compatibility witfi a3jacent uses are the two basic issues involved. The medical /health care use creates the demand for 7 parking spaces. Currently, oh -site parking is more than adequate to accommodate this use, even with the other established uses (such as the deli which requires 12 sprees). The medical /health care use should be compatible with the surrounding commercial and office uses. In essence, the clinic operates much as retail and office uses, with patients arriving and leaving at abrr l the same interval as customers or clients. Finally, the clinic Is located in a corner suite, thus making it less likely to disturb adjacent businesses. j, III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: 1. That the proposed use is in accordance with the General Plan, the ob3ectivAs of the Development Code, and the purposes of the Industrial Specific Plan Subarea in which the site is located, r: 4 - PLANNING COM41SSION STAFF R0ORT CUP 88 -27 -. PERRY CHIROPRACTIC CLINIC July 13, 1988. PFne 3 i" 2. That the proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvement in the vicinity. f 3. That the proposed use Complies with each of the applicable I provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a Public Hearing f Tn a aT1fiy`Re ort newspaper, the site property posted, and F notices sent 9 AW property .owners within 30d,' feet of the 'o rpj. ect V. RECOMENDATION: Based upon, the above anOysis of facts and Tf n'Ufl_9s, s a f recommends the Planning 'Commission approve Conditional Use Permit 88 -27 through is:aance of a Negative Declaration and adoption of the Attached resolution.' Re sggCyullY subm teed, 1 J /Ci ty PI ner 88:BH:nlg Attachments: Exhibit Ilk Letter from Applicant Exhibit "B" - Location Map Exhibit "C" Floor Plar, ResolutOn of Approval Michael A. Perry, D. P-Q_ box 858 Ranc. ?o Cucamonga, CA 91 Rancho Cucamonga Planning Camnission 9320 "C" Base fine Rd. Rancho Oxannnga, CA 91701 To whom it may concern: The chiropractic clinic I an Proposing is intended to meet the expanding preventative health care needs of Ranchn Cucamonga. in the atmosphere of growth whirih thYS cam - Gmity finds itself, I an endeavoring to meet the needs of those members of the can - munity wbv have realized "an ounce of prevention is better than a pound of cure ". Our clinic will offer "state -of- the -art" physical therapy and x -ray facilities. We intend to be open 8:00 A.M. to 6:00 F.M. Monday through Friday with emergency care available as needed. •I foresee a maximum of six (6) employees at one time, including myself, but Will initially have three (3). Based on the growth pattern, econorrics and demographic studies, my management firm and I agree t'nat this location has a high succG,t; potential. I look forward to the opportunity to meet and serve as many, members of the cam-unity as possible. CITY RANCHO OF ' .' j•. DIVISION PLANNING Sincerely Michael A. Perry, D.C. ITEM: CUP 88 -27 to TITLE: LETTER FROM APPLICAh EXHIBIT: —A SCALE:., n Io VICINITY MAP comme"fal Units IDMMI IA" 9125 Amh,bold 9135 Achlbald U.Nrfr SO. FT. UNIT so, FT. I A 1.326 A 1,342 B ': 182 B 1440 41H gaig c 1073 c 1: 7.8 D ,954 D 1691 E 1.605 E 1:418 F 1,f83 F 1.200 1.182 71bSTREEr- 36' sm" 1111 oil 11 11-f—I!L' -ILL, f �7m I LL. LL 1 if A 9133 Ar--%tM Ave. ,t$-N H4 a 1. ITEM: CUP IR-97 TITLE:- LQCATION MAP EXHIBIT:� SCALE: --O—ne _ 7th Street --� CITY OF RANCHO ♦,O r. PIANNING D; ISION J( ITEM: CUP 88 -27 TITLE: FL OR PL N EXHIBIT: SCALE: RESOLUTION NEB, A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNIUG COMMISSION APPROVING+ CONRYTInNAL USE PERMIT NO. 88 -27 FOR A CHIROPRACTIC CLINI" LOCATED AT 9125 ARCHIBALD, U'XIT A IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 44) - !;Fill: 209 211 -4$' A. Recitals, M Perry Chiropractic Clinic has filed an Application for the iSSLInce of the Conditional Use Permit No, 88 -27 as described in the title of th!IS Resolution. Rareinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the aapnz$:tion". (ii) on the 13th of July, 1988, the Planning Co;mission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date, (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is heCehy found, determined and resolved by the Planninp Commission of the City of 1ICIcho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby? specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in'the Recitals, Part A._rf this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on July 13, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby, specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property loca' d at 9125 Archibald, Unit A; and (b) The property to the north of the subJ site is vacant,, the property to the south of that site consists of industrta"l and commercial buildings, the property to the east is industrial buildir;4s, and the property to the west is single family residential. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: PLANNING CCMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 88 -27 PERRY CHIROPRACTIC CLINIC July 13, 1988 Page 2 (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (n) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or, welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. This been reviewed and cor�,3dPl ed in compliance ce w theth - fCaliforniahEnviro mental Quality Act of 1970 t.ind, further, this Commission Wxeby issues a Negative Declaration. 1, 2 and 3 above, thisrC x►mi sion hereby approves the applicationnsubject�to each and every condition set forth below. (1) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Tndustrial Area Specific Plan, and all other City Ordinances, (2) If the operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or op*.•'ations, including, but not limited to noise, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for the consideration and possible termination of the use. (3) Any signs proposed for the facility shall be designed in conformance with the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance, any Uniform Sign Program for the complex, and shall require review and approval by the P1s,,.,ing Division p -ior to installation. 8. The 00puty Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF JULY 1988. PLANNING COMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA BY: Larry 'l. ,iT'Chairman ATTEST: raa Wilar, Deputy e r - PLANNING C0144ISSION NESOLUTION NO. CUP 88 -27 - PERRY CHIROPRACTIC CLINIC July 13, 1988 Page 3 I, Brad BulIir, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the "7City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning commission held on the 13 day of July 1988„ by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS; NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COK41SSIONERS: A DATE: T4: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM0NGA STAFF REPORT July 13, 1988 Chairman and Members of the Planning Comnissinn Brad Buller, City Planner Nancy Fong, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88 -20 �- a eve ogxnen o a se - service gaso ne s aan" consisting of a 1,024 square foot retail building and three pump islands covered by a 2,719 square foot canopy on 0.73 acres of land, in the General Industrial District, Subarea 1, located at the southwest corner of Arro'�► Route and Vineyard Avenue - APN: 207- 252 -48. I I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION., A. Action Requested: Approval of a Conditional Use Permit for a seIT- sservice gasoline station with a Mobil Mart, Detailed Site Plan, elevations, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zonin North - o Ouse; um es�dential District (8 -34 dwelling units per acre) South Vineyard bast Business Park, Mini - Warehouse; General Industrial District subarea I East - Unoccupied Manufacturing Building; General Industrial Subarea 3 West - C4"amonga Flood Channel, Single Family Homes; Medium Residential District (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) C. General Plan Designations: ec= genera, ndustrial Subarea 1 North - Medium - Density; :Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) South - General Industrial East General Industrial West - Flood Control, Medium Density Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) D. Site Characteristics : The site is vacant and rough -graded ree mprovemen s along Arrow Route and Vineyard Avenue are completed. ITEM K PANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 88-20 - Mobil 011 July 13, 1988 Page 2 E. Parking Calculations: Type Square Parking Number ng Spaces o Spaceso Number Spaces of Spacesof of Use Fhotage Ratio 2tVil2L Provided Self- Service Gasoline Station 3 3 Retail 1,024 1/250 4 TOTAL 7 7 II. ANALYSIS: A. General. The site is part of a previously approved Master Plan as s own in Ext M t. "C ". 7(e proposed Site plan is in conformance with the approved ''a4 +;fir Plan. The proposed elevation for the Mobil !dart builiing and the canopy differ from the previously approved elevations as shown in Exhibit "Q °.. The proposed materials will be consistent wish the existing business center c "ststing of sandblasted finish and fluted split face block. B. 0esi n Review Committee: The Committee 1Blaks:sley, Tolstoy, Coleman) reviewe d C e proposed prciect on June 16, 1988. The Comittee recc-mmended approval subject to the following conditions. 1. Scheme 8 design is acceptable. The column size should be increased to 30 Inches. 2. All building materials and colors should be consistent with the existing Vineyard pest Business Park. 3. The columns should be designed in an appearance of structurally supporting the canopy, 4. The gas price sign should be integrated into the decorative screen wall by extending the wall out into the landscape area. The gas price sign shall be more dominant in size than the Mobil identification. E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 88.20 - mobil oil duly 13, 1988 Page 3 C. Gas Price _Sign: According to the Sign Ordinance, a maximum of O monument signs per development is allowed. Presently there are a total of 3 monument signs for this Master Plan Development, one on Arrow Route and two along Vineyard Avenue. Also, a condition of approval for this Master Plan stated that no additional monument sign will be ailoved for this site area, except for gas price signs. The Sign Ord'x.ance does allow gas price Sig n, one per street frontage up to a maximum of 24 square feet of sign area and 8 foot height. The developer is proposing such signs. However,, the desiq; of it shows the Mobil identification is more dominant i1; area than the gas price, which appears more like a monument sign,. During the Design Review meeting, the Committee stated that adding Mobil identification is, acceptable, but the size shoe d be less dominant than the gas price information. Exhibits "J2 and J3" is an example that illustrates the concept of integrating the gas price sign into the decorative screen wail as recommended by the Committee. The final design of this gas price sign and decorative Wall will be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 0. Environmental Assessment: Staff has completed Part II of t e Environm.7Fa-T-CHe—c1Fr7st and found that no significant adverse environmental impact will occur as a result of this project. If the planning Commission comurs, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. III.. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the enera an, e o jectives of the Industrial Specific Plan, and the purpose of the district in vhfch the site is located. The proposed use and the site, together with the ce.rditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or imprc:ements in the vicinity. The proposed u, *,e artd Site Plan, together with the recwwnended conditions of approval, are in compliance with Each of'the applicablT provisions of the Development We and the Industi1a� Specific Plan, IV. RECOMMENDATION; Staff recommends that the Planning ss on approve Conditional Use Permit 88-20 and issue a Negative Declaration. _. r1� PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 88 -20 - Mobil Oil July 13, 1588 Page Resp ily s uWtted, Bra 8 e City P anner BB :NF :vc Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Kap Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "C" - Previously Approved CRastep plan Exhibit "p" - Previously Approved E,avations Exhibit "E" - Uetailed bite Plan Exhibit "F" - Grading Plan Exhibit "G" e Landscape Pharr z . Exhibit "N" - Elevations Exhibit "I" _ FIvor Plan Exhibit "J" - Example of Gas Price Sign Resolution of �jp oval with Standard Conditions 1. r: r Oz t Z �ar U u i -� ANTNMi�1LL 1 3 � I: EIG L7 Kim ROL,T� 21 r 11 t i of . t If IL I NOM CLrAkMONGA m �+' l t: • guy � -.� �.r�.. 1c.dNY S�iITA+ra t1cG,C. `� Jl '.2n3.� EsV7/y' /°Y404i f'I/�'Y°'l.X`': � '' nar�•cti -n- can. �I(L� CCM1 G�CB7 T.SZi��l414CG�Gl -OG�. Y C CC 1MVv7 f I S a71: ^cr .xoc <. f F �y .�'TL 54041 l!4VE`''iRO'11Pt:W72-- . Cuicv,4�o.�i4snow �w'rn oTr- "sl'r�1 + +r � 1, Mheyard Wad BARMAKIAN =8 c+: '<P A wb Company Aar, m cabana ..—........_.......� .. �`_•_,.., a �-- �L�.^,e•_, __yam,. mmcrti 7r Nkll ---------------- ---- i• f � �'ti f i uu+a. � e� __._ _ _. d -------------- - fI to i N k r to trera Hr� b4 na c i cnTOF CUCA M MANNING r 1 � I fir= S A 1 j r lr" 5 1 t 1 � �l = fj 4 '. It -- - ------- ----------- ------------ ----------- Aum. osp, re Tralrrs f"L0.09 IF . fr ri �' Yr 4tf.aQ_ ••rFYS .i o i r Y� PLC SJZE Kk i TREES - G17OM COVER "° • °�'••� nrawiSWUM ..,...r.�... ice°=" m• r.+,m.,r C_ EXHW- SCAM kip r, ..Pasl EAST ELEVATION 1'. 81-01 marMw r -A WEST ELEVATION ;p SOUTH ELEVATION 1-. G.-o- rnau tjt TO MATCH E=TMO DEMCPUEW -TOMTCHEZWrMCEVMLOpMW- NORTH ELEVATION ;p SOUTH ELEVATION 1-. G.-o- 11 SCHUME r ••�. MR..n aT CPC. l.4RZ•S'� »4.1T'pS� v rMKL.avT — wl �� r T •` .�Y t s' I� rimn nw MC—" cent-- PL- /0 D • e. fr: ,t fi 1 � frwxh �p[srwo�� LJ il I I rimn nw MC—" cent-- PL- /0 D • e. fr: ,t u vim• ,-•QY:-i� y AMIAW rtr'v 10A VOW' OR i i SRROW HIGHWAY L w z c� w Z F. C FLA Cu+ +4 CROSS SECTION WaM Caafl Brand 1 Brand Wand of ��►:�"'.� R��lltaa UnWodad 1 Aw4L- 70 A+Vf LLI �i RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING CMIMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USS: PERMIT NO. 88 -20 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT 024 SUARE EET,SRETAIL BUILDING AND THREE PUMP IS ADS COVERED BY A 2,71.9 SQUARE FOOT CANOP° ON 0.73 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUT14WEST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND VINEYARD AVENUE IN THE GENERAL; INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, SUBAREA 1 OF THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN - APN. 207 252..:3. A. Recitals. (i) Mobil Oil Corporation has riled an application for the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit No. 88 -& as described it, the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter, in this Re ~ "Vtion, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred'to as "the application ". (ii) On the 13th of July, 1988, the Planning dommission of the City cf Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legs' prerequisites the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B. Resolution. NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Plar, _• "omatission of the City of 9cncho Cucamonga as follows- 1. This Comr"ission hereby specifically finds that alT of the facts set iu.nh. in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the abov-- ,referenced public hearing on ,July 13, 1988, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds Ps follv,gss (a) The application applies to property located at the southwest cor:mer of Vineyard Avenue and Arrow with a street frontage of 153 feet and is presently vacant; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is townhomes, the property to the south of that site consists of Vineyard West Barnes Park and ^mini- warehouse, the property to the east is an unoccupied manufacturing building, and the property to the west is Cucamonga Food Channel. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 88 -20 - Mobil Oil July 13, 1988 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantl-al evidence presented to this Commission Burins the above - referenced public h+,aring and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds ane concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan and Industrial Specific Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (h) That the proposed use; together with the conditions applicable thereto, will nut be detrimental to the public health, safety, or weif?,re, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions, of the Development Code j and tPe Industrial Spi cific Plan. 4. This Commission hereby finds and cert -ifies that the project hat beer, reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental ' Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conciusiw: set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the applice on subject ty each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. i Planning Division 1. rite approved canopy design is Sc:hwx B. The column size shall be increased to 30 ". 2. All building materials :end colors shall -�e consistenV with the P; sing Vineyard Vilest Business Park. Full material samples shad be submitted for Planning Division review and approval prior to issuance of building perm,'t.. 3. The columns shall be designed in an appearance of structurally supporting thr, canopy. The detailed design shall he subject to City Planner *eview and approval prior to issuance of 'building permit. X11 j 0 IF, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION No. CUP 88 -20, - Mobil oil July 13, 1988 Page 3 4. The gas price° .sign shall be deli ned to b g e Integrated into the decorative screen wain by extending the wall otrt into the. landscape area. The gas price sign shall be More dominant in size than the Mobil identification. The final detaile6 design of Ws gas price sign shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permit. 5. A combination of lands aping berms and low profile halls shall be provided wittin tp,e landscape setback area to;,screen the gasoline pumps from public view. Berms shall ,6e rip4ilating with an average freight of 3' and: Maximurg slope not to exceed 3k to 1, 5. All walls screened and perimeter walls shall be of split -face and /or vertically fluted block, 71 Any signs purposed shall be in conformance with the Uniform Sign Pr.cgpam for the existing Vineyard West Busind,-s Park, 8. The parapet wall for the Mobil Mart building shall be high enough to screen all rnAf- mounted equipment and projection. 9. The store front design shall be consistent with the established business park. 10. Special landscaping shall be provided at the corner of Vineyard Avenue and Arrow Highway with increased number of trees, specimen size trees, and shrubs. Engineering Division 1. Overhead Utilities of Vineyard Avenue - An in -lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (electrical for the .65 KV electrical) on the opposite side of Wheyard Avenue sh4)1 be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be h of the adopted unitt amount times the length from the center of Arrow Route to the south projn- t boundary. b) Arrow.:Route - An in -'lieu fee as contributiott to the future undergro:tnding of the existing overhead utilities (electrical and 0)ecommunications) on the opposite side of Arrow Route shad be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. Ttte fe4 shall be is the City adoptad unit amount times the length from the center of-Vineyard Avenue to the west project boundary. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 88 -20 Mobil Oil July 13, 1988 Page 4 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall -certify to the adoption of this Resolution, APPROVED ANh ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF JULY, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CVCAMONGd BY: Larry a d,rman ` ATTEST: Brad Buller,- epu y crE..,ary I, Bred Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and re,kilarly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Cc, -Mlission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of July, 1288, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COWISSIONERS 'j k lu ii I 0 G~d R i M.ux: O'�yw «� C> 4JCNp i4 6ay 6V n..M� �qg �! a�.r�s.'v�a�c� o3tl�� a•�pi � z� �o� -^wQ �a�s° - .' O Rl W LYhn g� MM o' 2 V ^z d e Yom. u y 6V V li y p a C V i ^� � Y C g S'Y�'�O s94pq�ipJN �a�n �y Fz {0�. NNp^ �x 6Y/. VC9`. OMB b - a_yYVG � 3SO& P';f1Y xp ME.>+ y ^er..,3tt 4 u ue li • �YN lai�.~y4 6 S am '.riY9�°O ^ 22 � g Y3 / vCn ^Jd rYYQ7M Yll;vl s1 Ef ARM b N 0 i NNa O O H � �pp J ai N 0 yY� g g Ci � W • Oa ��.s ^q��Y gyOf a ■y- �41. ■!NY �'y i `�`^�siCp+gp� �� fy`. •PV � V`�NF w o Jn `YN1 a Y�y1 9yy�yy��p YQ� O ad A �FC Y� c�. V�fY, avayQ 42 i ` ttp yaw ■yy Ctic + el K i r C YM= v76G C>OLipYypVC. Y C iii 0 �Y O . bV., I o C�r �wvT Y V a L C d uY = r p Y y aial s Q K.0 L �b.MSCNC. qC0 Y Y• Y-�~V NY•O �$E3� ggo ggog33» Nr�a ��CIDI L• =g0q,q..� w�+ � N d ^F,g � ^�M�v NN oa AE Ny�Q� O N =9`. pp�Y. �s�a• o.1''' u .ifF�• e wb jJJ I i Ya I M�w. rJ "Y.�. p I S C w.l V y w 4 � r «L" TYapa�. C pp ti Y Y ICY d A C w u Y Y Y C iii 0 qL 20 V a L C d q C = r p Y y s Q K.0 L b ^Cm C T �Q{ .vi ewffw N�4.�: �= ^b go$N N ■�� a� $ifq .ifF�• L� �� L a M b � `r �� i■ �' 4^ L 6 B 1111 Pfl q) VI w 1rd '� �r g i •� ICY �Y� p(� tb� Y b U _Y N V y y' N• w l F —as C a L t��t al : � i p g Y.p1w N 9_Y O L � 6 SAO a.= pp�Y� Ao L p STLY Y w M G 6 ! L ~ S 6 yQ _ �w N C C Sit _3QQ pN C tl ^ Jy Nr iV. LN ^>NA YQ� ra ms i +'C yu�yC' M 6 d° Y R _ Q^ Y N ^ L V! N c l a N Y t t hr. Y e i C A JJJ Y. y L N^ yYwc.F.$b uM � i M u Y.0 > � O p DY C A w •q� u pwy. u L Y L O L V Q1 '� • V gL ` y. C n o as �a. >. are tYi°L ab 140- aweg ` b°w ae a�"3• .rLg« y V6 y L C�� ` L �o 735 0 R V I Z E TY.�Cyw °� .`.Wg�yyy Lap Y Y O jig gc g $ = Ca x s 9aa' w y Y Y c b p ^ G 0 M Y^ 5.1i 3 g3 dd pt wCy o C Y > NYY 0,n. y�r V NN; {y{1� w t°ip�.pn �.iyYN i pp CrIgInal Poor Oualfty C O O q L 4 O C OI V W L L Y C COY Cx � V ��, 0.000 qwN VL'S ML Y rA lqa ��'; LG @ O 7S ` 9eY iii 9� J-R �• t'7�. -0 �M � o� iity ua �'W�S i'S « � � i'a� 6 S M $ + S Y. O V q.0 A Y° °. O > r p� N0 0• 1V' 3 NIB �y� ^ ^ ^V{0YNYy,U.�N.O a �C�N �E`" YLOI �' w••. VY`4.s CON Oa� tlYNC Y•..O.Ntl0�'•. C�1t li I- n`Y' yy `C� ^a .. Ew R p��h +C YE y1 Ctpl�uyl« ��cC yM_ rNS NpO N > .N Ma$QgS'E®N�6 NOy Cai •.■� Eli! Z`�o °mg _S.s.a_ YY■� 1i a0$ . ' °n i.�ntt4'• �ya !e(��C ii ze w aMBYp.�NC C�. Oi.•IAtl �GG jl y�Oi v ~ ors �Yq¢q��gq�3g e YKW110 p�64 ♦Yrry _Vu It O N wM y s gs ^ O°4 sr0 p C• � L� ' q5Ly� AaC� ' i g ��Y0 . g ¢¢¢ ^�9p �Y « a OC J i�. � aL L9c O e«Y sit 9 M V C 8 New4i1 <M.z <M 8M0 rNi KN.y�. ^i:Ol�li. �'C 6�O�L � N t• � 2 C N 5 ii }�, N! C q •. n C� �y. � Y A N i pY`S c'a �•� _ S -Re. L6 Oi «a� «.w� � E w> >w rd °IV�� w a rd� � �'" .��F �,. '� eoa� •'o a1N .U° aria' yyy4 C N �pY 01 yi N.�CYY'. =i N �Y^ Y a�6 yC uYY 76Y Yb �Vi ¢G nnpe Y gO� ^pQ. V$'" «j fyl fall ■ yyY N1•i tJ° r�N O V 93` O GGO` V L Y3 yY «Ny S Yi � O V `. @c CY L q> > �pytl Olw °�. CLe� V Vim Lw N E� OS� P�� +. Li� ■ =u j 1«$'i �. Vim.$ 1 i. °.c yu ° e.. Y+LYw s� ' Sg�S>,. L ,aw I.w`P °. yiV ug- ,NJJ +w.aV ®. yY L`4� �..�. nM N ��OC OO1L 4 _ ^N4Sy 6NS� y0 NSNy K NN'�Lr 4.�y p 7C> VV C0 WE E O ° NO y N ,i V •,�Y� iCCI► 1 CY.� Y �1.�C� «�O, L O; LON Cy �. Ni V.� V yN S �1 0 ° V.�° . NYI .� i i! C V M.^ V... ^f Y 07 .may w f V. nu1 >CC1 > YG nM. qV I.4 H�Nw.i a0 WOy =wbO i . O -uo C ,y • 1 0 I-� w 3 Y E ig NON O:O V V W i rM N H M MY !y. o G NC�w y4yA� U�LS�iP V. ��MY NOQM Now NY L~. YOp alp. {� i� ti C y ! Y 4$P °" e a yL {yy '1jj� � —129.4 Q a4 C6Ytti qL wpp iOp �4`Aq 0.M .l[Lt►N L A%t ;e Y m w IlV r C � y O O oN u L W W � O a �pj yy � CY w � ctC V 3 N �Y q jL 2 ~ 9 V 9 L y V Y wl YN W SN'31 Is `:s Eta Z ^° e$p` is F1 ra p U yC g si a g: wig • iEs ` 0.~ o�s _Y pMwO 2aTL v ts a H-1 6 4 C D L v e etY:1 3 Y L e Y W it .L yyy N _ s MID it w.R Y CtiE QLE o T► gg W w i �p e■ �� w Y Nv CNJ O ti 'Z ` = Q �'.NO Liter ± '� i >N ,°•• O'li yQ OsY wV 3:Zet is Q A i 4 w�Ll r +W. vA� +� /yp.1Y� $ Y gY 1G •V1. � N � C C�! V.C�V 3 V`r 4�.�! �QO_� 7�� ti .c °$as.$ c M. �.,:"CC *.�o�` "QasO ■Lw�. 5p ♦e ^v�'. 6y N_4 g N w_ O L ° �1 p N C 01 >d;i OIS �1 ,'u. �rW Vy 9Ow _ 6 C6's p8 MO6.U+ w. C_ Y�y w eA OC � ,w.. t14U0a �c� p CAL MM �`1q n �,.x t. . IM- no Y.Z 3V yy� cvL° ►. c,i v ^�I � VNL T�� o y ` � C vq �•� O• Y.4_w g > nt �.NL V�� rO � y «.'i Ot. O'� L C Cw =!/� SN `. •�i r 3 °a gqo s y L �c C Off. S` p 6 3 IL e $^ eo Via t Cw a' _wb NNE 'aIS f.Cu�TTaa 8 Mq :gyp 'lSJ�� 7 Y V N I a ae aMe go ;; gig Y�NVa� w �. lY�j p 22-1. ^ w g -a- _ a M a d v �' wNY all �s� Np �.a �f `aG gn 9.2 q fie . is -no 's I NO�ffT�. � t. bLQ La_� NY a wa d qli w LYVVw' Y =^4(�. M6Prr {LI N GOG e. Py �C�CV {Q{�I�r�1y � y 9 �wgy` �Ie YL�lM 9!� >t�14 W N q 4 V V+ L G L M V L` O• OI Vs �) . N V O F LV "ca .. G 6- . wuu �w n�cs.. t3 O a••. ow . G V N 1 = = N v a :i(Yl �S iJ gYw ALA yyN�e Y' pG �'� §N M N ad ��p•n� }N Yy` iM N�x Y MW �+ N • l C � ,CY �i• $S°« y'e' S-'' wu �gVV�tn i K �f g c n I `n' a s g u k $ L >e ; j ^s �ay��ag vv o.C'$'. Y� Er ca r �.° w'$' g `.N4L ^E`o N.� 1:321- oZ a 5° is In LT 95- q ®YN ilq.fu pLN p �I .Ol. ~LaO �u L r. e Zia p t u •7�f w gr � ' e g se +o kL J& KL +'N -C 8 y�jiW.r yyyy •�u i1 psg gU�C1s >t AM 6n g Y L YYL L� aYY ^Y yY Yi L`Q1v Yr.N Yq �`o5i9S• �n°i �•$ iu s'� LS.L+bL'ru 3� �+� � ®�°. g �•� �� a � y m i y Be ig f W A sL al�Y a°. ° 'S rl 11 ee �g Y M c Y @O N�e K f Y Y M .c m I v $r u� 9 � N N 1A N V Y W A i n y a u � N M aYi � C i p i i s w 3^ A iZ {p`. f ■Cy � uy p p lNi 664 fag gS �Lq aEA N 9 « 4 « s.YS O C C B N N � N I I I �i yy7 6 N C r C +N• ° V Im $tia.� vu T u, lip 6 zs® a `�s Y N sad «a , ug sat gY �g Qlt «g y In yy N yy7 6 N C r C +N• ° V Im N C V €aC•IV�^ C � C�yyy V b iy � 4• i IQ—of 8 O Y s9�•:.� C . W e g NL 'dV v Lb�4 C L7 L W tl N L b 1. •C N F N � � n �1 � t I � r #», v7G • _N Y Y b �Mys Y'�' yytl O Yri� `e 61� b9z 911 sy �; g Z JOL of �M C L_r JyyO� $ w C L M °a GG a� s N Y •" N O 4W` L ¢vW Cp 7 V.�Y O �a 1��j i. yq if��0 e N'v py 9 a� �gyYV eNW YY iO� r A I I N C V €aC•IV�^ C � C�yyy V b iy � 4• i IQ—of 8 O Y s9�•:.� C . W e g NL 'dV v Lb�4 C L7 L W tl N L b 1. •C N F N � � n �1 � t I � r #», v7G • _N Y Y b �Mys Y'�' yytl O Yri� `e 61� b9z 911 g g Z : j $ Y qr V w °a s N Y •" N O bLo b L t 7 V.�Y O �a 1��j i. yq if��0 e pV v = ° a� N s� I wt.4 � N •�� •e� Ly � `e �� R•y�� yL� ty q • N Z /f � p/ O c a•.. b �� Y qr V w °a M Y N 3G_a �p Y• �s� yq if��0 L N V b aY pV v W,A s� I 1 1 1 7 z r I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON A STAFF REPORT DATE: July 13„ 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad 80l er, City Planner BY: Tom Grahn, Assistant Planner Iyn�fi�� SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL .,SSESSMENT AND CCNDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88 -29 "moo?- ifle reques o expan an ex s ng o ce use n a eased space of 3,120 square feet within an existing industrial park in the General Industrial District (Subarea 11) located at the aortheast corner of Utica Avenue and Sixth Street - APR: 299- 411 -17. I. PROJECT AN'D SITE DIEWRIPTION: A. Action Re uest�ed Rev-few of a Conditional Use Permit for an expans on o art oxisting engineering office by '758 square feet. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zonin '�Qr = acanl: Genera n us rial (Subarea 11) South - General Dynamics; General Industrial (Subarea 11) West - COCa,RCo P laFacility; Industrial bPark (Subarea G) C. General Plan Desi nations: rOJec ,nera _nduttrial North - General Industria, South - General Industrial East - General In. :Llistrial West - Industrial Park D. Site Characteristics. The proposed use is located within ar. ex s ng mu t- enan, industrial complex. Building I includes Pine tenant suites, five Of which are currently Occupied by various office uses. Approximately 50 percent of the tenant suites in Buildings 2 and 4 are occupied and uses include,i church and various office and quasi - industrial uses. ' Both tenant zuites in Building 3 are Occupied by quasi -ind" rial uses (see, Exhibit "on). E. A licable Re�ul_ations. The Industrial Area Specific Plan Peim s ro'fe3s o a ,?Design Services within the Geiterai Industri District (Subarea 11), subject to a Conditional Use Permit, f ITEM L PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88 -29 - IYrK cN July 13, 1988 Page 2 F. Parking Calculations: (Exi Type Square of Use Footage K.B. Leung 2,362 Total Existing Office Leases 28,987 Mobil Oil 6,790 Club Deli 1,632 AM Speedy K-inting 1,632 Highland Community Church 5,542 sting Tenants) Required Number of Number of Parking Spaces Spaces Ratio Required Provided 1/250 9 1/250 116 18 + /�nq 16 1/250 7 6* TOTAL 175 236' * This is based upon the possible need during normal business hours. The CUP was approved with five offices and onr receptionist. The project is not fully Teased. Thirty -two thousand square feet remains to be occupied. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The additional 758 square feet of office space reque-sTed under this proposal will have a minimal effect on the overall parking situation. However, in assessing the overall availabi "ty of parking, a potential discrepancy was noted between the number of parking spaces provided in the project and the number of spaces eventually required. The project contains a total of 80,000 square feet of tenant Space. City regulations require 200 parking spaces at a ratio of one space per 400 square feet. A total of 230 spaces are provided, i.e. 30 "extra" spaces beyond the City requirement for multi - tenant projects. However, because of the mix of exiting tenants and the high proportion of office type uses, 175 of the 230 spaces are at least theoretically required by the existing tenants (please. see Table F). This means that the remaining 55 spaces will need to accommodate 32,000 square feet of building space which . is yet to be leased and occupied. 11 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88- 29'`i- IVERSEN July 13, 19E8 Page 3 This will severely limit the type of tenant that could move into the vacant portion of the facility. The 55 available spaces will only accommodate about 14,000 square feet of additional office space, OP 22,000 square feet of mixed industrial use. Only low intensity uses, such as warehousing, could help offset future parking demand. Although there is no parking problem at this time, staff is concerned witi potential problems when the business park is ful %, leased out, Wa 'gave indicated to the property owner that we could not recomm:e: d approval of any now office tenants (or c'her intensive conditional uses) unless a parking study successfully addressirri t.ie issue were submitted with future application. Such a study is now apparently !Mer Way in conjunction with anal or application, and the owner has indicated a willisyaess ,o deal with the overall issue. In regard to this application, the additional 758 square feet of office space requested under this proposal will have a negligible Effect on the over,il parking situation. t will increase the potential deficiency by less than one parking space (0.86). 8. Environental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been comp e e y`We ap` p -Mart. Staff has ccmpinted Part II of the Environmental Checklist �...d has fouAd no significant impacts on the .environment ss a result of thi project. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: in order U, — )prove the Cc,nditional Use Permit, the Commission would need t� wAe the following findings: 1. That the proposed nse is iA accordance with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Coee, and the purposes of the ` dustrial. Area Specific Plan subarea in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfaee, t4 :, materially injurious to the propertiels or improvements in the vicinity. 3. ':rat the proposed use complies with each of the applicable prbvis, *'ors of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in ally Re ort newspaper, the property Pasted, and notices �� sent7a eTl prope�'r- y'cwrers within 300, fleet of the project site. PLANNING t%NISSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88 -29 - IVERSEN July 23, 1988 Page 4 V. RECOMMENDATION. Staff reeommendij that the CCaMMissicn hold a public e71, ng car: 'Ts Item. If, after considering public coW,2gts, the required findings can be made, adoption Of the ettacher! Re.5elution of Approval wou16 be approprt4tc. As ars al 'non tiee, the Cm nlssion ray wish to roaa:inue the ro o t en ` ng u "ttal u ' a parking study by the 'applfca at, p p ss Respec sub! 'h'G !l, i Brad uller, J Z Cit :`,annex da: *,t'e l attachments: letters from Applicant Exhibit "A'" - location Map Exhib it :16u .. Sf'.e Plan Exhibit "ell - Floor 91 an Resolution of Approval . 6 I775s Sky Nk East Suite V) The Koll Company California 9VI4 Asset .%tn -- +�jment Division (714) 261.2499 t ,7uno 24, 196$ ' City of P.ar -ho Cucamonga Mani° �partmant xsG. - JITI'MA r USE PEWIT "Cicho raoL is Busineas Park, 9229 Utica, Suite 150 Dear Sirs: The attached applicaton for . •thp, above referan^.ed Cq: is ft��; ,g Leung and .4svocie.tesiL Inc., at the above refer -=ecl- -premises. b AWL The proposed use is profeuslonal /design aervie ,,ea,ie, tenant is already existing within the park ns a si- -- 'yAzral engineer. The hoars oi' ; Veration are Monday thru Vrid gam to 5pm. The nuawex of (- ,zploq�es ar% approxiaia.tely' �ximum.� Reason for requeatibg the CUP at this particula, x o,4ion is m:ik Aroa 11. Sin ely, w All +=IAII� Diane M. T-i:rsen Asset Hit'n&ger i KOLL 1 17753 Sky Park Ea--t Suite 100 [nine The Koll Company California 92714 Asset Mam Bement Division (714) 261-244? Jay 5, 1988 it`. Otto xiVUti7 DLPUty City Planner, City of 9320 Baseline Road Ranc?t.o Q=Wngar .A 91,730 RE: t..�Mr FOR Ti9Cr 0 tMyMONAL USE PENS P-MaM PACIM BUSES PARW Dear Mr. R'rotatil, Pe.. oar meeting with y01 on Tuesday July 5-th, this lot'wW will serve as a written reg:est to (11 suUnt C=Utional Use Permit applir Lion .fCw Mr. K.B. ?�•Tg on jUly 13th - gearing data based tom the fact that tetgant alret W existing in park and despmeely req=rm Mvpanaicxil. (2) gsquest for holdaver for Americana Diversifi(d wing date. Our nteltion is to ,-, , 521e. for r aff 27th hearing refeL.:rx-,i.ng th; pa - -%iM issu y< Aar R. d�ata3led traffic t ort W1 r1OPW- tfully 1200 this w t in oxxIear to acz�. -,abs our tenant, rzs. s '►dditianal spasms .. Ax we inlic ate4 touring our MeetLq Mr. Imung desperately requixes tiLis ex zwjon qMM in order to i mWoute a=r.Mooate his work load, &TXd hum the motive Pers mwl to his business plan. I c.rzwt2.y a_qpreriate any and all support in tvglesting a Ccxditional tTse Permit for the above referm ed tzvmts, If you have any questions, please don't, hesitate tiro iil my office. Sirrerely, HDrA 1'�'1Ntii3 PAWTc bVSnws PAPF Diane M. 1,�Vr.wr* Assis' t lase darer L Ell] FIG. IV -13 oYn...naY ®® �m•aaw. a ®Y imYaw: err aa'wr KOM. 11Yt tOYlt[ i- Fi-F1• 44W ♦« •«• memo 1pIL[/MUIt6 0.00 <t6i0'.l�N pppY Yn� "^i°" Sreul tRU�s�Ov u Hw. r� aeew near ® rr.sunr` xenow�. `1 a t T1�i alprM WYw��alyM•A�Mi0t ly0tr� tlb yl. M M MNlwl wtld� [i Ott M.Lga Ty - "' CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISIG /-j ITEMS TITLE: i� u EXBIBIT: SCALE: ". -- BUILDING L 4 % r ch I N .p -� ..h 100 1750 -- -•ft', N 61 pp cc 105 1680 j omega 115 2030 i in ' . tltghL:!ae Church - BUILD: WWI(, Diy 2. 120 g542� I It1 � I �t � ��r �f'�s�• 140 22.40 f Ali UXLDING 3 I� -1 f+l)YIN[jGN 145 1680 I 150 1750 " c -- _. q•- y_UILDING { 1b 0 J , D "•� 120 416 „N", "� ,^�+ u °.�. ° '^ o .n 0 amok Sixth Street G� Raneh® pae►fle Buslnass Part PACIFIC SCBNa. INC. JLDG 1 - 20.340 ag BLDG. a 13.690 of SLDU 3 _ 10,530 of BLDG 4 - 30r440 t,g. CT- rY CF RANCHO CLUAAjCNGA T'TL.E 1`- 4 b EAhIJJI : SCAL Q -- i RESOLUTION N0. A RE50LUrJON OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING.CWMISSI\7N i APPROVINta CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT V0. 89';,'29 FOR Al I EK- GINEERING OFFICE LOCATED AT 9229 UTICA , #,ANUE, SUITES 155 AND 150 IN HE GENERAL IhDU.! RIAL OlSfrcICT SUBAREA 11 i - APN: 209- 411 -17 A. Rec=itils. til Dic,ne Iversen has filed an apRlicaition for the issuance of the Conditional Use Yermit No. 88 -29 as described in the title of th,s Resolution. liereir.affer in this Resolution, the subikt Conditional Us'e Per—mit request is referred to as "the application". (iii On the 13th'af July, 1 88, the Plann of ing Commission of the City Rancho Cucamonga Co�iductc A�'a duly noticed public hearing on the spplication .and concluded said hearing on that date. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurrod. B. Resolution. I NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determine, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows.- 1., This Commission hereby specificall;; finds that all of the facts set forth In the Recitals, part A, of this Resolution are true and correct, 2. Based upon substanti:l1 ?vidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced publ {`4 bearing on July 14 1998, including written and oral staff reports, together with prablic testima.6'., this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a? The application applies to property located at 9?29 Mica Avenue, Suites 155 and 1E0, within a fully developed. site consisting of four multi- tenant I-Idusitrial buildings; .and i (b) The :.omplex contsirss 80,000 square feat ref tenant 'space and required 200 parking spaces at a rat-to of one space- per each 440 squa.. -e feEt of gross fiaar area, hwwr ver, ?Z, parking spaces are provided; and (c) The a;-,plicant proposes to expand an Wsting office u e by 758 square feet; and (d) The ho.irs of Operation are Monday through ,Friday, from 9x00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. with a maximum of 12 employees* r; ._- �1._ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTIow No. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88 29 IYER E July 13, 1988 S N Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evideg!,* presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specif c filldings of facts set forth ill paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together with the,, coedit ory applicable thereto, will not.' be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare,. or %aterially injurious t*► properties or improvl**ents in the vicinfty, (c) That tht proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the DevelopMent Code. 4. Tiis Coolmission hereby finds and certOies that the project i5S been reviewed and considered is compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, furVier, this Commission hereby issues ,a negative Declaration. S. Based' upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this; ;Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below find in the attio^hed Standard Conditions attached hereto and Incorporated herein by - thir. reference, Panning Division (1) Any modification, expansion, or other chance in operation will require 3 revision to the Conditicnakl' Use Permit. (2) Approval of this request shall rapt waive Gompitaeace with all sections of the InduSttrial Area Specific Man, and all other Cifiv Ordinances. (3) If the operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or operatives, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before tho P'anniig Commission for ':he consideration art( possible termination of the uie. CG DITIONAL.UUSESPERMIT 8829¢- ZYER$EN July la, 1988 Page S (4) occupancy of the facility shall not corm. nce until such time ss all Uniforan BUilding Cod€ and State Fire Marshall's regulations have been complied with.. prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Foothill Fire Protection District ana the Building and Safet.� Diviv:ari to show carpliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance for occupancy, CSl Any signs pr®itosed for the facility shall be designed in con'tormance with the CoMprehensive Sign andinshal� any quiree revgewPAnd,, approval cbyplihe Planning Division prior to instatlatian. f6? This Corditional Use Permit is approved for a maxim= of 12 employees, Hours of operati n are 9:00 A.!d; to 5;00 P.M., 14bnday through Friday. 6. The Depute Secretary to thin Commission shall ce,4 fy to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 131H DAY OF � ;., , 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RWHO CUCAMONGA 8Y: a�— RY'T- 7c a rman ATTEST:— u er, Epu y cre any I, B •ad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Conmissi,on of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the ,Planning Commission of the City of Rancho ftamorga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Codas ssion meld oa the 13th day of Jply, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit ' iAY99ErS: COMMISSIONERS: KOES: COWISSIONERS; ABSENT.* CL"ISS:ONERSt p f r -- CITY Off' RAI 'CHO CUCA MON A s STAFF REPOT 'f mow. DATE: July 18, 1988 TO. Chairman and Me;abers of the Planning commissiot FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY, Chis,westman, ASSistant planner SUBJECT: ENYIRDtqME6r'TAL.- AWSSME!ma k.".D CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ,Agju7 25�- - ,e request o es a s, an o ce in ek" spaces square feet within an existing industrial ptr^ in the Genoral Industrial District (Subarea 11) located at t..e northeast corner of Utica Avenue and tixth Street - ApN: 209- 411 -17, The applicant has requested a continuance r o q � for this item until July �7, 1988. A parking stud` is being prepared v'nich will be submitted in support of he item, spe &er ed, rad C a KOLL 17735 Sks> tack East Suite 1idt. Irvine The Kart Company California 4;;714 Asset ,bianagetnent Division {714} 2612(99 Ju" " 5, 3988 Ft-. Cato ltvutn Oqxxty City ), tla V*x, City of nmctly 9320 Basel.irtt, Rom OXMMW, Ch 91730 RE; RP3MW FOR 1M CCtoi -ram Tom, P& RAMM PACMC BMLME .S PARR Dew Mr. &Mtil., Per w; ittet2 � with lm an tA*Way July 5th, 'this letter wi? I sexve as a s t to (2) st "Mit �datic�U1 Use Permit aWlication far Mr. I{.B. 'till July 13th heorinq data bwwd LI= ttse -pact ti t termt ins alre,,&y wastiM in park mid mat oly �ti �ia2. E23 rAquest far haldaver for American nivifi �, ;%. for Zuly 27th h�n3 date. Our xarteztt'cn is ua & l with a `a#led tra ;fic ,,,.,.Our the park.'a2g i le. xt 14a reRxctfully Mkt th#s ricWst in Or&r to a=uMwd&tO C= 7ix�'s aWifaOr-i.:,TM= r"L'r�, As lie ir4icA d=` sins ne , Ar. T dP-cP Mte;ly - this ion '`ar 'odder to ante his c+�uz3c lc , a i h thec ve 1�pr his busim s plm� to wo=te 191met3y aPPZr Aata any dn6 c'S,i� i ;>LVport in I.tquesting a C=_d7.tit23t l ;J but for th+ a x-f 4vnMd tenants. M� you have wry auestiam, please don't USSit ate to cal 2lsy OffiM. Sinaerely, 1W RM PACMC am== pM, Diane M. Iversim, r Assistant Asset Nor .M I CITY OF RANCHO CUC.AMONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: July 13, 1988 r TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Chris Westman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIROMOIENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEV"LON4ENT REVIEW 88 -15 - e eve op3,73 n a , square iroo res aurae an 38 acres of lard within the Office/ Professional District, locate at the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue - APV: 208- 811 -58, VARIANCE 87 -06 - DESIG.a COOPERATIVE - A r(,quest to allow a re uc on n e requ re s,ree _ side building setbacks and the average landscape setback for x 1,700 square foot restaurant on acres ProfessionalDistriict,loc i located tthe within northwest cornercof Aft Arrow Route and frchihald Avenue - APN: 208 - 811 -58. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: Action Requested: Approval of the site plan, elevations, and con i ons, rev ew of a Variance request and the isssaance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surronn-�d-in Land Use and Zoni-n�_ or i ;ae�- a ,rofessional south - Industrial; Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 3) East - Gas Station; Medium Density Residential (8 -14 West - ResidentialtLoweDDensity Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) C. General Plan Desi nations: Pro ec a ce ,-ro essional North - Office /Professional South - Industrial Park East - Medium Density Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per ar,re) R*&T, Lour Density Residential (2' -4 dwelling units per Acre) D. Site Characteristics: The site is essentially fiat, with no 8 gni scan vege�;on, at the intersection of two Special Boulevards which require that buildings bR setback at 45 feet PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Development Review 88 -15 - Design Cooperative July 13, 1988 Page 2 and Parking at 30 feet, The lot is a legal (vnd-er- sized), 'ihr west and on-conforming parcel Single Family Residential exists to completed in that rstreet widening wi11 Occur long Archibald Avenue as part of development. E. Parking Ualculations- Type Square Parking Number ces of Use +iSp cesof Footage Ratio Required Provided Restaurant 1,700 1/100 17 17 II, VARIANCE: The proposed use is consistent with the zoning s r1c �in which it is located. However, the parcel is a legal (under - sized), non- confo�fng parcel and wit, not allow the proposed site design withcat variances. The table illustrates the extent to which the par.rel' is non- confor�dfng; Exis�:inc� Re used Lot width 90 20,J Lot depth 180 1,15 Lot size 16,200 40,OOG The specific variance ►requests are for a reduc *ion in the average landscape setback along Arrow Rout- and building setback along. Arrow Route and A-mrl bald Avenue. A. Lanasca in a Table 17.10.040 -T,i of the Development Code requ res a 5 average, not less than 35' feet, setback for streit side landscaping along Special Boulevards. The appl,cant hoe Proposed an average 32.5°. At no point is it less than 301. P B. Building Tiplble 17,10,040 -b of the Oevalopment Code requires a 48—MinimMn building setback as WasUred front the face of curb for Special Boulevards, The 4PPlice,;M has proposed a 32 setback on Arrow Route an={ 3C' leem Archibald Avenue curb face. However, wits regard to the Arrow setback, the Development Code provides: that parcels less than 175'in depi need not provide a setback greater than 20% of the depth of the property, foe parcel is 90 feat deep which would require " only an 18 foot setback versus 32 feet. proposed. Therefore, a variance is not required alortq_Arrow,,Route., ,r N0 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT 1 Development Review 88 -15 -� hdsign Cooperative 1111, July 13, x:.88 Page 3 C. Factors for Variance Consideration: The purpose and intent of ar ance is vc provi a exibility from the strict application of devrlopmeAt standards when special circumstances pertaining to the property such as size, shape, topography or location deprive such property of privieges enjoyed by the Property in the vicinity and in the same district in cont`,tent with the objectives of the Development Code. In reviewing individual crises for Variance, the following criteria must be considered- li aecial Circumstances (1) Is the property unique with respect to size, shape, topography, or location? { (2) Are there exceptional r extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property or proposed use that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone? 2) Preservation of Property Pight (Hardship) (1) Can reasonahle use be rmads of the property without this Variance? (2) Without _1.4 Variance is the applicant denied privileges enjoyet. by owners of other properties in the same zone? (3) Is thr hard3hip self- imposed or created by the Physical constraints of the site? 3) Damage to Others (1) W111 the Variance be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare? (2) Will the granting or this Va, -iance be a special privilege inconsistent wit'► w'mitations on other properties In the -ame zone? III, VARIANCE FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Staff determirt�s that thij following acs justify a rr,ance request and the v- iquisite Ondings: ,{ A Special circumstances do exist in that the property is unique +ith respect tc size. The site is a legal under -sized nrin- ;cnforming lot. N0 /0701-02 o 7- 13-88 PC Agenda 5 of 6, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF RcPaRT Development Review 88 -15 - Design operative July 13. 1988 Page 4 B• The hardship is not Self - imposed but Physical constraints of the site. created b conforming lot of the In width site• addition to they nthre ' Special 8nu7evards,` setbacks are required for C. The granting lic health, safety, or Public of a Variance would not' be detrimental welfare. to the V. DESI &N R. €VIEW CO�+1r'iITTEEt Eo zmen re;r�ewe " e `ate COMittee (Tolsto , recormtendations roJect on June 2, 1988 y, McNiel, and made the 1, Th? 'loading zone should Incorporate the trash should be screened from public enclosure view. and 2. A provision should be made for future reciprocal access and Parking between north. vehicular the site and the property to the 3. cornerlof thecsp entreatment should :Z11 given to the suUt heast 4. Dense Panting shoutdobe evergreen tr��• arar� other a north property lines. provided as ;1 btyi`O th apwestriand S. Parapet detailing, similar to that used elsewhere building, should be Provided on the ca e as a P" for stuccoed areas. 6. She accent lighting fixtur of a rust . color: es on the west elevation should be T. Special attention should be area- trees and and receive approval of patio and hardacapevdetails should be reviewed the City Planner. VI, TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE y , an ma an The Committee reviewed e e fol7owir, the g recommendations, 1. An in -lieu fee be undergroundin paid in contribution to iitie future Route. g of the existing overhead utilities on Arrow 2° � ;n -lieu fee be undergrounding of the Y n contribution to the future Archibald Avenue. e` °sting overhead utilities on AIL /Ir0 PtANNIX° COMMISSION STAFF REPORT" Development Review 88 -15 - Design Cooperative July 18, 1988 Page 5 3. Relocation of the existing signal pole be complete,, i• prior to occupancy. 4. Additional dedication will be required along Archibald Avenue in order to aLcommodate a right turn lane. Other issues involve the potential for the property - directly north. Because a limited access policies on Archibald Avenue the coordinated planning of land stretching' from Arrow Route north to Steer -n- Stein is essential. Technical and Design Review Committees have reviewed the project and made recommendations that future development north of the project site be granted access through to Arrow Route. The access could be ach;eved through the granting of an easement; however, it would require the removal of 3 parking spaces on the Golden .ix site. In order to recuperate' 'those 3 parking spaces it would be required of any proposal north to reciprocate through the granting of an easement for parking purposes. V11. ENVIRONMENTAL A.'ESSMENT: Parts I and Ii of the Initial Study --Ao Have been comp :�-e . significant impacts have been found related to the construction of this project. VIII. FACTS FOR FINOIN613: The building design and site plan, together gith the recommenled conditions of approval and the associated granting of the VaM ance will make the project in compliance with the Development Code and other applicable City Standards. IX. CORRESPONDENCE: variance 8;' 16 has been advertised as a public Flea ng in i e Daily Report newspaper and all property owners within 300' o�—Me su ec area have been notified. In addition, <r public hearing notices have been posted on the subject property. X. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission receive a"TT public testimony including written and oral �s^taff report, make the required findings and approve Variance 1 -06. 9 Should the Commission approve Variance 87 -06 it would he appropriate to approve Development Review 88 -15 through adoption of the attached Resolution of approval. Should the Commission not be able to make the findings required to approve Variance 87a 06 staff should be directed to work with the applicant to revise the site plan to comply with all of the Code requirements and /or prepare a Resolution of denial to be brought back at the next Planning Commission hearing., �d PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Development Review 88 -15 - Design Cooperative July 13, 1988 Page 6 t Respe ly svbm' ted, Bra B C'tty Pi ner - BB:CW:vc Attachments: Letter of Justification Exhibit "A" - Location /Site - Utilization Map Exhibit "D" - Site .Plan Exhibit "C'r - Elevations Exhibit I'D" - Landscape Plans' Variance Resolutions of Approval Resolution of Approval with Corditions l y i wilding D sign, Conwiting, &VIr ng and DrcatfiN Residential - Remodeling - Industrial - (ommerciat April 18, 198fi Mr. Dan Coleman, Senior Planner CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 31730 Re: Golden Ox Burgers -- ~ Northuest corner of Archibald Blvd & Krrow Ate. City of Rancho Cucamonga Dear Mr., Coleman: In reviewing th:a project, lre would like to bring your attention to the required set -backs proposed, ;= both Archibald Blvd and Arroy,Rte of 45.feet from curb face. Both of these streets front the subject property, which is currently recorded as a 90" x 13'." lot respectfull to sbove-�bentioned streets. Now, by subtracting these setbacke plus the additional 20' x44uire4 for builings or 10' as required for parking from the north property 2ine,�r also deducting the 11' dedication for engineeriug to construct tk, right`turu lane along the entire Archibald Blvd frontage, we arc left with a net buildable area of 25' x 125'. We would like to point out locating a building on this site with those constraints would not be the problem as much as the fact that it would appear impossible to locate any parking for on -the site, with or without a building f- for it to serve. It is for this reason that wa feel the requtiremeats of 451- for both streets f to be setback severely prejudices the subject property and request a variance for this project, E Since.rery IF f I. Michael La fe 'y Pzincipal ;.. Ltfi,: -al cc. File � c NO � 215 N01h Sor, Dimas Raa. Scan Dimas. Califbrnio 91773 (714) 599 -6206 °` S?a392ff18 xD N3a'7o? :i,Y8d3dOQ� NOl3i39 1;1 �� —4 lLJ r; lid j- I1 �nlMw* wN eYWrs � - - w •+tom roew�w,� mw�,a elp .,n ,� e[isa, � " �n � ry^Dtl fan' � oNa'yY ly Ay a S2i92t(1$ XG N3U'10� 3A k i i L O �f3 � �o H A;wJ 'tew oaf ,awi+.�• qn an 4 s i S�}mfns XQ N MOO 31°LLVi�3dOC� ht�1S3® I!) i� E a ' CL uj LU 3 NO . is b ' V -$WVW p K,o 52139iino X0 ��a �CLpY M..LN Y _ tp�Y vt� �.". wR�u6o.°�' -u� Y bwI4�N 1- y °' es�~j�i�dvu nu °d € V.— Yom-. Y`�83 J. rez _ flyz R . - CN �a y Y G�.�wt a+��"P + y Zj f� 2.0 ®a to op.�.��. 72 tl NM �i�$ w.s'i' as IT, „ *,Sr Its Y . a 1 r "i a N O y o ^4 s e �Qy u A Ca�S ��a' u Q�s w Y 1 ri N a _ {y� 85. It e L ' Eli w a S ►: Y o >. 6 p uW u .y.. as + c c V _ Y xrr 1 r "i Y y o ^4 gg e �Qy •Y�� A Ca�S ��a' u Q�s w Y ri N a _ {y� 85. It e L Eli w a S Y °i >. 6 p MG ` r•�� .y.. as + c V _ Y xrr 1 r "i }} �l C� °r V a �f� Y Tgl w Year cp 6uy\• N Y 4LNg C � C � r C CNL� q p � G Y (/ w 4Na 4 O Q � C �A O L Cy O) `Y1 Cp it Og4r 6m L ' N Y L �y>jSL `M �N v doi' Q Es.. AL aa��CC C q r L yyyy C� Y q M § H, YiN�Ww ad F 00.0601W 9�n`Yic�N�o O~ Y p a d Y Nu L O V V Q U � 104 `- pCL "cam Yy Ow` �LL Y L Y.Lp�LO'` N 3qV tf�CyM�M�. M^ S MO A N A N. «Y1 8a�,L ytl�S '13102 MJf as I.MLS3 W fNj � r wee I i +ag"- ^ 9A 28q L V C LOO O V � Y q tl �� m q Y O` d ss L CY N�M. • 7 YON \J W wssu o C Y V g O w y pa 5Y Q < q X. 4 c e O t M N n N y� � b v Nq^ 4 L S� ,Gyp�J H y N � s i y 4 } yAY q� r 4 $ «c C q $ 4 al G^ u aO5 0 22 p+ ^"S 372 p L N w L q aS� Y� yy O 6 L �9 ie r NZ ND �4r Zia 9 N CYO we q qT O 3 Y N++� O NN V �Yg V ,ow a w >»lA Yy� 3w ai p = - F- m S W iy Qer.0 120 C C Ol .� w C 7�`a O Y a: u0. m G 6 y � Y tlNY L O L Y N �! i _' Yqq 64 uu n H ^OLYaY a0an p i■Ml. pl L - p asM c °O V°. .CNN W. ~ a'^ LNC. 7 .. ip Y > wOy ^7 q ■ qN � 4 mw `@ yy _ zz V W yy ^ L 7« 6 Y p at t G g r c w }�N O{ N p4N"Nleua LN l NS'ZY C �g YY ^ `C g V V Y tl C N C w SB�C q E21; X24 OAe p :5.. GQ 2 oLoM CV aeYiV ab 66 mph �.Zmga NTq��L.YVw C pN C =Ya^ w.,.. C� j� N M �a 0 �'M Y ^� pld`• H L L L yL i Si ^> ��N ,,GGY �C ^p 4w�Y campy M"• wG apo e�vL^gg4 q Wq vS. e][( SSY�{Yp �� ppa �w Gy �W aO�N d C�w,r�w Ii0 FyL ` W, v r. rs wTL W^ MM9 < N 6 Ya U I I i I w M G a� +M+ � C N Y w G LFi t� cw •LY �G G? N'cuc G O Y �tl v oL r y < 4 9G z"s MiLN a` « _48 1piG H .§ q ew w p� ILA V C OL.Lf y G 0 Wa A`p� N`9Md E y ^` L.q GggCUY�f. � �'7 y�MAY yCT a, L' a GMC N= MO M4�y ±4 C Cy V 4Ga],P'a6.0 q p ^ ^ XCol u ti .Wq. i�'W yyY'3`20 J ei t V-i Y 4 Y Ylr 6 a a'- aS.0 O N HAO EM23 cgE CN 6 Vey'y O r O L N A CtLLO N S > ' Z t+ 6wN Y� Y1 N Y• M01 cMCON e Y 0 } y V 4 Ld Y yl F-51 N e w a cJ` «o4 it 6 � Ot�« tM4 e+t ^S gNNLyy C O q } = 4 R s Z 'Ala V L C C Y r8c'g3' n Zoo y NV^ Li `'• Y V q c M O w S > L a�." WE � O Iv vu 4..wu a ^w cai I e� J 11 .0 U ll....i ,'Duality, =G17L Yxa +�` 'O {U VLLLa+C yN p 'r'04V Oa N Ot~ etf CNO 4�"�¢f.IL �� ,may. 3Rit r LLa. E Ns WC#ww$ au W ��.�M $��• �? ~� �� ate. q. «�� 3°•,�.Su� � g$Q"� M.l Q b� +`papd o�' w., r++4 c't `4v+i;.t .,i= •`•cs` ■egp n3$ VqS a .4'.rla 4 NJN w # 6 4 �pla itgay q'��1'N un�. il•y. � CIS #yV #� �v'u sOyti1 t�"Q^ ^Ni4ivM�gLpG CX` QWW #� llliiig lv «�C XJ# af�M "NLy2y''Yj y3 ask. 6 @, YvN #.N q ��w ~Q4LNE^ 14N 1. . L'aNtr ow aypL4 S�6v y gg �•,g :c.fi R+ a��4aa �t ay us„r.iS •! I {? Jigs p4 prr 4� C ay L w pY9r $ i NIA p is ppN d�V Y' G9N 9-5 NsY� K{4N�ys 4■w o .N- ewq. �M N y0a�Y 114�SY A Py, a a T Q G A Mb GGG y O'Kd ~Sis� •+ `.� 4: M* V yyy y °��1 buy' p rQ y1 y-2 W S4 L'la L A 4y Y �+ L # r^ M N « �: -'8 A ° L �. i set: t +t C44 @0.Y6 L1yI.M uCtl>il. ®"�O;1N A4• C�`� L CN,'�pp� gywN M(4 CL itl► 0 3# N Y� 4 N - r` AS Oyu Li N w 441. f% Gc Aw CC P V it L ; #. « 4 w M, N M 4 Ly 4 #� �{*`}.. � '�9:N i+SN Ktj �!V'. C♦.. �.rL � ?G. 9�0.yyy � NiVA`a41� R W40�a/fu� C Not � w i l.1 N W Q. tle 3=a- - 1 �d'� tt�81f Ulsi� I�f� C�4Gt%+�� ✓ ,,' x '4 L ? ��op Y C• Lu CyVI L r$NrY ywA ■ a YCy... QY 3 4 Q r'1 'ypx�w YcA�w a� 421! �sr V YyytgR '"r I b, : f V � tt «Ypee jai 19 w N {J 1ll 3 LdC 4wM t¢ gy it Y. N S� S o tt LCC�e.e vw ae a �® E N L %NIA. Nr ~ OC Wow ^ f ?ryryCL, O �o.M Utz sG' a.04 a"i yiy q� e w CY� M��•"• �� _ 4 A � s �w �1 �'i rei T M C G 4 n Vw ppp vy. lei 4 wa�'Q^ Cn Oww LD Y v rt Yaai�� tPN r tl �` Y M "v t3 V CQyw L O 3=a- - 1 s 2 .L° . ,,' x Ca wF Q �" e L1.r Lu CyVI L r$NrY ywA ��.Nw $lu 3 4 Q r'1 'ypx�w YcA�w a� 1 �sr V YyytgR '"r I b, : V hil a . � Ent «Ypee jai 19 w N {J 1ll 3 LdC 4wM t¢ gy it Y. N S� S o tt LCC�e.e vw ae a �® E N L %NIA. Nr ~ OC N �at'Lt7 � 533 N4 o� sG' N I N a. .cVci Sv ■. eYLCT fal Y • a ve M C G 4 n Vw ppp b CL yC V 4 wa�'Q^ Cn Oww LD Y v Ch'11 iV'CY ON .Q. Y z �J 9�W4` i4 Y + � a f yC yC a y ^ N z 1i Q �" e L1.r Lu CyVI L r$NrY ywA ��.Nw :tw 3 4 Q r'1 'ypx�w YcA�w a� 1 �sr V YyytgR '"r I b, : V hil a . � ML.. «Ypee jai 19 w N {J 1ll +vj riI f i i4 Y + � a f �+ a Ct r. Y C 1i IL �" e L1.r Lu CyVI L r$NrY ywA ��.Nw Y M Nil. a • a� V YyytgR � 6. T@ ti ML.. «Ypee jai l w N {J 1ll 4wM Y Y. N S� C !�l - 2 9 vw ER N L %NIA. Nr ~ OC c .l j7 N4 � N I N yy yqG, L� ■. s �i ! fal Y • a ve 4 wa�'Q^ Cn Oww LD +vj riI f i i4 Y + � a f �+ a Ct r. Y C y� IL �" e yV R CC Aw Lu CyVI L r$NrY ywA Y M Nil. a a� N M MV- L l w N {J 1ll 4wM Y Y. N S� C !�l q vw ER N L %NIA. Nr ~ OC Y N4 � N I N yy yqG, L� L 4 9 ■� s �i ! u L1 g�.x� NyC 4 O NyC .. ■ yL L C. E. � YYN � �J ^ q't'r eN� 3QQ Caae ,Yr °TC Cyfg p oa -i w^ � `ui i�i �� +. a w wow � H �'�°'r M °. gr�ngEF 8 3 8 a` UR{Q`ig� g3 !RS 42 . $ T Y1fa =M ylN «LY i «Q Vi i� ��'`'1,�°ia w��p p� •':� gyVj �a Ee w MFG C �• ^�L°. Htt `�' i.e. �' $Q i .S�a,� or d• -„6.�� °i -A. yp w a P 4 i° a x O tF.M. 2. g 11 Se f` itf tY Y [w ' �� M .i11 . pL YiY w�a1� • y CG6 hM °. '� L +5 i .'K.;�Ui$ �o�w Mw� �• 3.�9 sr acN' rga+ Nw O^ t a yy_ _ .cm Nt �y`�. ^rj?QQ. YQ• Oy: W� ^� 604eeMg LC q� G µ..PC +� ±e �qO�L O�M.• Ly N OOYw C1 ;�; QY 6�� MMy° N.C� ^v a °c'L��'3 ��. `�Cve. :cc�33�a Wk WGtJ �6 t»6i lrJ 'i A'017 LA ^°e' *]'{ wVLY f°E' Wt! T ¢.' 3 V��++Y.• N H p N O .• '9 Y :L L 4 »a Q V O w G M �'• N^ . L y Y O I� r `o 0 23 +•^ Nar7 Y CV WL '[�'. � N sC � .�f. lYmC d6 �)�� `V C <dp ^. � cW. =Ma •^O a C c C l' V C CE�. n� rs C! j. �,4 M-2 �. •n.�q. C y C Y �y L r C y�O �7 ass M 3- µD LO -bS 4i "'iGr1 11Yy pp NV: y„` a c'• yYw yL VSu a.. LL Yaaor dad 1Y�'y�p. 'a' �e NL Ts� i Y4 � voLor „ .5-2 yYe�- 6WayN�n YY L. Y ^Y + LO�. y YC� �pQ CYg Ly D ^. V4^• tlISL YitL L+ ONE NT �Y Nt.Y_��W v9oS$w invLS su 6.°N.s�ri� 3 c`Sv ew €. Y ae$ 3 a �yY Y y` Y � 90 NY Map Y. Cy AM OtY T v Y 0.V 4 Y a iN Y. � d� M^ L ♦��S�r� i0 L� c� a. w•E•t '� p Lt. ""'�� i +yam° �"r '.Q Y� V�^ �A C � � �V� MwC � YV�� •'� j � 0. C � O � y q, u CC■ Y G w � � � � ~ N V aS 6Hy4C^ ii 'Epi qC^r Mb C V C V~ ELL�7:. Od'� CY Y r, s Y N aL !r'_. 0 Q Y. 4� _'��' W G.y OL "Y � fpL� Rr^ O Lc'' ■ ■4 N O U Vf Y4� V NqN CY L w 's C.t _��W YLY�.O. 4zv *L Se W l G�i 9 N t O I = Q r "" tpr� U G W W y�► �SNE:U N68 m o1 aZz N- VVV+ 2� 4. a 13 i v S w w 9 4 O L nw Y ' ° o� LX 11 Y Q a C s+ L v RY va Lv� yw �g�gr �o i ° d uR 3 Y dr °RRb' ;2n5 I _1AVIV I I 5, e� Cy YO +s Is a R V R CCCG.52. W N L - V RY YjV ap G1 L V+ S.l C Lt2i- bqy� yY d VAN 4� 4 Y ippt �pOMM Y ++ SMJ. p+ L M C W iiC O -S^ Y g.. �C r �yy _ W gY■ 4 Y US L O y 1 N .u. v y � V O V�� 3 +L oC fy.CMV " -a ps� R ^C � �Y Y ya yytl� L M M O 0 :7� YYY�Y K iii _1AVIV I I 5, e� Cy YO +s Is a CCCG.52. YRr YjV ap G1 L V+ S.l C V + R d VAN Y E N LY Yp Y tV� 01 YIS O V O YY° iiC n R!n. R.,,rVO g.. �C r L yV Y W � 4 Y US L O y 1 .u. v y � o ryt Yuv sy ps� y M M O N Y -C 'm ham.°. N �'1 N q N _1AVIV I I 5, e� Cy YO +s Is a CCCG.52. YRr YjV ap L S.l CY OY� p + R Y E N LY Yp Y tV� 01 YIS O V O N iiC R.,,rVO g.. �C � tl ■. {O� C{1. M. w.r..♦ O y 1 s r A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUC- AMONGA PLANNING CObISSION APPROMM DE.'ELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 88-15, LOCATED AT THE NOMWEST CORVIER P JARROW "'��T> AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE IN THE OFFICE /PR+3FC:5SIDNAL OISTRICT - APN: 208-811 -58 a A. Recf+ tit Design Cooperative has filed an application for the approval of Development Revf1w f'v. 88-15 49 described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this ReSOTuton, *'+e subject - 0evelOpment Review. request 7s referred to as "the apisiicati?n # , Oa i;,e 13th of duly, 1.908, the Plat10,19 COMission of the City co of Rancho Cucamonga a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. (111) ATT legal prerequisites to the adoption of this R esolu .ion have occurred. S. Resolution, NOW, i'NSREFORE, it is hereby found, deter ni'ned and resolved by the Planning C or�n ission Of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as ;'olli)ws. I. This Crf son hevehy specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rec=:itals; Part R, of this Resolution are true and correct. P', Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced mAeting oil duly 13, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, this i:oMission hereby specifically finds as follows. fat The application applies to property located at the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue an Arrow Route with a street frontage of 90 feet and Tot aenth of 180 feet and is presently vacant; and (is) The property to the north of the subject site is a non- conforming Single Fancily Residence, the property to the so,.th of that si,e* consists of an Industrial Park, the property to the east is a Single iamlly Residential tract, and the property to the west is a gas stxtioi7, and -} the application has an associated Variance request. 3. Based upon the su6$tantial evidence M16sented to this Coffelission during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts sst fortis in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this COMMission hereby finds and concludes as fo, lows; tat That the proposed project is cornsistert with the objectiv-_s of the General Plari, and N'vav I }. ,.. PLANNIMS COMISSYON RESOLUTION N0. DR 88 -15 - Design Cooperative July 13, 1985 Page 2 (b) That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and (c) That the proposed use is in compliance with each of Vbe applicable provisions of the !Development Code; and (d) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimentaa to the public health, safety, or walfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. This Connii;sion hereby finis and certifies that thE'project has been reviewed nd considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby iswes a Negative Der'ar4tlon. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Coimission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Pjanning Division, 1. The loading zone shall incorporate the trash enclosure and shaT`i be screened from public view. 2. Special landscape treatment shall be given to the southeast corner of the site. Final landscape plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner. 3. Dense planting, evergreen trees and six foot masonry walls shall be provided as a buffer at the west and north prnperty lines. � 4. Parapet detailing, similar to that used elsewhere on the building, shall be provided as a "cap" for stuccoed areas. 5. The accent lighting on the west building elevation shall be a i ' rust color. � I 6. Special landscape and hardsca;pe treatment shall be given to the outdoor patio area. 7. The textured pedestrian path on the west side of the building shall be reversed with the planter and shall be continued north as a future connection. M AI PLANNING COMSSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 88-15 - Design Cooperative July 13, 1988 Page 3 8. A revised site plan shall be submi'tted and approved by the City Plannar prior to the issuance of buildipg permits. 9. Approval of Development Review 88-is is granted subject! 'to the approval of Variance 87-06. Engineering Division: Overhead,utilities: a. Arrow Route - An In.lieu fee as contribution to the future undoargrounding of the existing overhead utilit"ies (telecommunication and electrical) on the project side of Arrow Route shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be the full city adopted unit amount times the length from the center of Archibald Avenue to the West project bcundary, b. Archibald Avenue - An In-lieu fee as contribution to the future u.-teergrounding of the existing overhead utilities A (telecommunication and electrical) on the Opposite side of Archibald Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit an=nt times the length from the center of Armw RoiAte to the north project boundary. 2. The exi'sting signal pole shall be relocated behind the new curb return and all iecessary signal madificaticns. completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 3. The curb and gutter for the Archibald Avenue right turn lane shall transition northerly from the north property line with reversing curves (25' radii minimum) to meet the; existing curb and gutter or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 4. An easement (261 In width) shall be provided over the-westerly portion of the parking lot extending from Arrow Route to the north project boundary for drainage and access purposes in favor of the property to the north. 6 The Deputy Secretary to thfs CommissiOR shall certify to, the adoption oi this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TO DAY f:�,' JULY, 1988. AOL PLANNIN(I COMISSION OF 'ME CITY OF Rk-_� CUCAMONGA Larry T. A PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO`. DR 88 -15 - Design Cooperative July 13, 1988 Page Am ATTEST: Braa Buller, _ pu y cre ary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution: was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning COMMiSsion of the .tw of Rancho Cucamonga,, at a regular meeting of the Planning Camr,- tission'held on tie -13th day of July, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: CWSSIONERS: AESDJT: COMMISSIONERS: i I i Aft) 2,5 RESOLUTION NO. A '_SOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUC*1ONGA PLANNING comiSSION APPaOVING VARIANCE NO. 87 -06 TO ALLOW A REDUCTION IN AVERAGE LANDSCAPE AND BUILDING SETBACKS LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE Itl THE OFFICERROFESSIONAL DISTRICT - APN: 208- 811 -58 A. Recitals, (i) Design Cooperative has filed an application for the issuance of the Variance No. 87 -06 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application'. (ii} On July 13, 1988,_ the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said he% -Ing on that date, (iii) All legal. prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution hzve occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and reso �+ d by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in'the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Crirrtission during the above- referenced public hearing on July 13, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows; (a) The application applies to property located at the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route with a street frontage width of 90 feet and lot depth of 180 feet which is substantially less than the required 200 foot frontage width; and (b) The subject property is 16,200 square feet in area which is subStdntially less than the required 40,000 square rest; and (c) The property to the north of the subject site is a non- conforming Single Family Residence, the property to the south of that site consists of an Industrial Park, the property to the east is a Single Family Residential Tract, and the property to the west is a gas station; and (d) The application is associated with a development proposal for a 1,700 square foot restaurant; and M V PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. VA 87 -06 -.Design Cooperativt July 1_a '988 Page c, d (e) The Variance request is for a 10 foot reductions the required setback on Archibald Avenue. 3. Based Upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission duri% the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. (b) That there are exceptional or extr,Aordinary circumstances or conditions applicable 'to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not ar-Ay generally to other properties in the same dust:ict.;, (c) That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would derive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the maiers :-.� other properties in the same district. (d.)' 7Siat the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. (e) That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity, 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commiss'on hereby approvasd tee application subject to- each and every condition set forth below. Planning Division: i) All conditions of approval required for DR 88 -15 shall be applicable. S. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution, Naz S PLANNING COHMI;3SIaN RESOL -UTION No. VA 87 -06 Desj'gn Cooperative July 13, 1988 Page 3 Ask APPROVED A90 ,ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF JULY, 1988.'x., PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHQ CUCAMON'GA BY: rar"rgi ATTEST:_ ra u er, �►� y ecre ry I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly an,' regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Comission of tbei' City of Rancho Cucanonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held an the 13th day of July, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: HOES: CO ISSIOHERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 1, ' -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ST"F REPORT DATE: July 13, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Cor_-�ission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fona._Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -56 e eve opman o ree ware Ouse 1351 an ngs o a Ong 177,030 square feet on 7.8 acres of land a the Mlh'jmum Impact Heavy Industrial District, Subarea 9,, io =av,2d at the southwest corner of Jersey Boulevard and PJchester Avenue - APN: 229- 111_07. Associated with 'this project ft Tree Removal P? 229-111-07. 88 -36,. for the removal OP three Blue Cum Euca /yptu- trees and three English WA1IfUt trees. (Continued from; June 22, 1988) I. ABSTRACT: The developer is requested fo,` approval of file office en ry esign, detailed site plan, elevations, Tree Removal permit 88 -36 and issuance of a Negative Declaration. YY. BACKGROUND, The Planning ComrmisSiAn at the June 22, 1988 regular Com ssi reviewed the pro)osed project as described above. lne Commission raised conczr!t with the design of the office entry. The concern was that the design did not provide 'suf4icient- articulation to the building plane. The (A)mmission direc re- design the office entry o be reviewed bed the Desin the developer Review prior to their consideration. The C m ssion also stated that the twelve (12) Olive trees shall be preserved by relocating them to a permanent location on -site, rather than along the streetscspe of Rochester Avenue. Rtiached far your reference is the June 22, 1988 staff report. III. DESIGN REVIEW CIYTTEE re °dewed ed approva The Cittee on July 7, 1988 e re- es gar of e o •ice entry and recommend to the following condition: l subject 1, The final color s-,heme for the buildings should be reviewed by the Committee again prior to issuance of building permit. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission rev1ew off a ice entry design for the three buildings. If the Cormission concurs with thA recommeadatidn of the Design Review f�i1legative Declaration would be in�order. viesr 87 -66 and issuance ITEM P PLANNING CISSION STAFF REPORT` RE: DR 8756 - DAVIS July 13, 1886 Page 2 Res t lly 5ubtted, 1 ad By r Ci finer BB:NF: o A-tachments: aurae 22, 18C. ?lannf»g C(SAission Staff Report Exhibit "A"", location Map Exhibit "B" - Sitlt Utilization Map Exhibit "C" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "D" • Grading Plan Exhibit ' "E" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "F" - Elevations Exhibit "G" - Previous Office Entry Design Exhibit "N" - Prb;osed New Offico Entry Design Resolution of Approval with Standard Conditi /,tns I j I I 1 I I I I I I lIl I i I 0 E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA c!CA STAFF REPORT Vc"� DATE: June 22, 1968i> aT0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission iszz FRON: Brad Buller, City Planner BY; Nancy Fong, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIROU14ENTAL ASSESSF€ENT AN0 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87--56 - e eve opmen o ree 131 warehouse buildings totaling 177,030 square feet on 7.8 acres of land in the Miminum Impact Heavy Industrial District, Subarea 9, located at the southwest corner of Jersey Boulevard and Rochester Avenue, APR 229-111 -07. Associated with this project is a Tree Removal Permit 88- 36, for the removal of 3 Blue Gum Eucalyptus trees and 3 English Walnut trees. 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION; A. Action Requested: Approval of detail site plan, elevations, Tree Removal —Permit Ea -36, and issuance of Negative Declaration B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant; Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial ?'=strict, Subarea 9 South - Warehouse /Distribution Centers,, Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial District, Subarea 9 East - Vacrnt;,General Industrial District Subarea 8 West Vacant; Mizmimum Impact Heavy Industrial District, Subarea 9 C. General Plan 0esgnations: Project Site - Heavy 1nd6 trim North - Heavy industrial South - Hea.,V industrial East - General Industrial West - Heavy industrial 0. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant with native grass and Weds. There are IZ Olive trees, 3 Slue Gums Eucalyptus treys and 3 English Walnut trees along the eastern partion of thM site. The 12 Olive trees are also located within the future street right -of-way for Rochester Avenue. 1 PLANNING CO, *'1ISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87-56 - DAVIS June 22, 1988 Page 2 E. Parki-q Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Building A Office 5880 1/250 24 Warehouse 51518 * 33 "5T 3T Building B Office 2936 1/250 12 Warehouse 51432 * 33 Building C Office 5880 1/250 24 Warehouse 59384 * 35 W Total T6I' I76 Parking ratio for warehouse is 1/1000 for 1st 20,000; 1/2000 for 2nd 20,000 and 1 /4000 for square footage over 40,000. II. ANALYSIS: s. General: Tho proposed project consists of three (3) industrial war- e1TOi�se buildings all line up along Jersey Boulevard. The development of this project would require full street improvements on Rochester Avenue, the new street along the western boundary of the site and the extension cr Jersey Boulevard. The proposed elevation consists of tilt -up concrete recessed windows an painted horizontal reveal ntrys and officeentrance treatment with plazas. B. Raid Service: The proposed site is designated for rail service according o Industrial Specific Pier- as shown in Exhibit "A". It shows that an existing rail line to the south should be extended northwards through the project, cross the future Jersey Boulevard and to the northerly properties. The applicant has requested that this rail service requirement be waived. The reason being that the extension of the rail lire would require extensive off -site reconstruction of the existing southerly tracks due to the grade differential ani' the maximum approach slope standards set by the railroad ctApany. This issue was forwarded to tha Planning Commission for the consideration on May 11, 1988 regular meeting. The Planning 7 T PLANNING COMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT REVIEN 87-56 - DAVIS June 22, x.888 Page 3 Commission reviewed thc. Staff Report, the wtir,,erl comments received from AtcH son, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad Company which verified the physical constraints, and received u p blic input. The Plarnin Coo ission determined there was sufficient evidence -- at - e�enson o ram ne cannot 56 'K 11,1111 SJU ue ico srca cons ra n son ro• ec , s —"and sites a e nor an sou an wa ved' atFi s rsquireme' n� '-- C. Design Review Committee, ')0mmittee (McNeil, Toistoy' and Coleman) on a ruary K, 1988 initially reviewed the project . and recommended that it be revised to address the concernr. of providing plaza areas, upgrading the overall architecture for the buildings and providing variation to the building footprint. On li �,lsad and Colman) reviewed revised elevation and site plan and made the following recommendations. 1. Building entrys should receive additional treatment through provision of free - standing or semi- free - standing Boise solid structures and stronger entry recesses. 2. Pedestrian furniture (tables, benches) should be provided within the plaza area of Building B similar to that used within other plazas. Convenient access should be provided from buildings to all plaza areas. On Mc�v t9, 1988 the Committee (Blakesleyz Coleman) reviewed the office entry treatment and recommended a perspective view of the office entry with landscaping be provided for full )Funning Commission consideration. Color perspective will be available at the meeting for the Commission review, The Committee reconmended approval subject to full Con+nission review of the office entry design. D. Tree Removal Permit 88 -36, the applicant is requesting to remove a uca yp"�ussees, the 3 Walnut trees and the 12 Olive trees. The Walnut trees and the Eucalyptus trees are within the eastern portion of the site while the 12 Olive trees are along the future Rochester Avenue right -of -way. ;An srborist report has been submitted to the City for review. The arborist mport recommended that the 3 Eucalyptus trees xid the 3 Walnut trees should be removed. 11A 12 Olive trees could be preserved by rewcation. Staff recommends that the 'Planning Commission approve the tree removal permit for removing the 3 Eucalyptus trees and 4alnut trees and require the Olive trees to be preserved by relocation. P -� 'M H' PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW $7 -56 - DAVIS June 22, 1988 Page 4 E. Environmental Assessment: Staff has completed Prrt Ii a$ tt.e Environmental sec Est and found that no significant adverse environmental impact will occur as a result of this project. If the Planniag Commission concurs, issuance of a Negative Declaration.•:'auld be appropriate. III. PACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the General an, e o ,_et tees of the Industrial Specific Plan and the purpose of the District in which the site is Incated. The proposed use in the site plan together with the conditions applicable thereto will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially Injurious to properties or iroorovements in the vacinity. The proposed use and site plan togetn.r with the recommended conditions of approval in are compliance Witt'. wl .h of the applicable provisions of the Developmflpt Code and Industrials Specific Plan. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve eve opment Review 87 -57 and iss:!e a Negative Declaration. Res Wan Br City 88; NF::al g Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibits "B" - STte Utilization Map Exhibit "C" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "t7" - Grading Platt Exhibit "E" - Landscape Platt Exhibit "F" Elevations Exhibit "G" . Office Entries Design Resolution of Approval with Standard Conditions 0 NORTH TITLE: �e,c ca r i n tti �p rlDrmm lYwlne? — w-� V^ 1; I CA TA%T r^ TAGIIT y1 : • tr.M71e.01111FAI W9t7lm 10%111[ 411" ,8II/7Rtlt. Yll WWI D J 1 _ LOT IT me..11f0 R'' 407 III P.M. of 142 IS. VACANT - . M , R7tftt RIAT7 ,811114141.: Im INPUT T►HY LIT 10 ILL 1116 Rolm t111RAt 0"Ilt1At • S LIT 161 RIL It I Neil I r. 1,81111111 we/ / /RDTOIIe 311111 TACIT f0lltli4 /[ \ ��•. :• PROPOSdO PAOJFCP -r O 4 C"` ` 11° It M.e. i /!I ® F:IY1•� �Y01te1 QtxI1 L- 11m7RY4 i1, s TOT ,IW ►. 1116E•fl t" too{ / 41AI/ INN1TfY1. mt.sYR 4MM..N 4. � /FF1wn1n 1nw W 7ffA07 O • 1 �_ � 1 V ,'ypMe[OltiArl MDWTtWi. IlilTiRO COYMi ACYL 1141100 Yu1F1n . ++T /1We All I a Oft v, r.r 4" *" /ILD ,8O.raGRT ' 01 {iA111�11M rF1tt1 ll IA9C11 1 P.M. IT IeT C: lw 117 111417 I 1MIMf141F11 Mf1ltWf.lY. WAIT .� ra lvnr _ - -- - -- `� R" P.M. Mis1TR I LOT 4{ D.M.- tR /Ie• {t pe 9141111 ,/AR1mtl. 37enu A11 $Ts OW!" lS � 0 nt3LL t a et e� � �t•1e. t..1 11%,861 MAT/ moric ". IM. YYut A. T. R. R. me VVILIt_ arum MAP fit[ 4112tY EINMiiReg C[Rfi! 111 tel CITT OF mimtll 411A111m6Ar tun or tuu;nu. NORTH :. CITY O \ Pfd ITEM: -P —k — d v� RANCHO CUC N TITLE: " �W �r Aft I yo 'ItNIIG IriiISl(N 7d1RI$IRIT:.3AlL, Y 5 k! 4M r I p �a 1J f O aim i U z • W _I WAA � a• I its � fill "" P MUM IF ra fall P' �� a et W E �W ML 41, W F. 2 / C U ►r /� W at 4t 1 Ct F 4 t / fill (`1 S r aat,. 1 rA a z � f 'Z' ' I��iisl�j�iFi�l, F � • a } � a , ajr. '. T� coo [wry, e on of "I C)r osa11ty �4 41h t Q f rsEpp �p A�"S JI f R 11141 -iii f 11114 i§ as �► k� U4 a ca �z O � fi U �S jail I q t o4g, Mai LED= V�r r 3 a v T M+fr �• � � ,R� \1 ,o Its ° �y SZ • —y��v F £2 f 1 a 1 4 L m g l c ~ � Z a rr s IT w cc d ; a ' � l �• 2 r7 C + U Ut y = W E [All g $ e� :ta WQ W f 3 E. < i LiI � a m t h ~ V U m m. XV V I� 7 0 4 p I W 5 4 "I. I it I� VIEW (P.-CORNER ENT*RY MY OF RANCHo cLrAmoNGA TrrLEt PLANNM DP49ON P/4 ExHmrr, SCALE: La OFFICE j 7% ? T. ,70,RECEP T 0 FICS F OFFICE FLOOR PLAN CP 118" 11 li Ek- I . . - . I RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 87 -56 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THREE WAREHOUSE BUILDINGS, TOTALING 177,010' SQUARE FEET ON 7.8 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE SCUr,UEST CORNER OF JERSEY BOULEVARD AND ROCHESTER AVEOE IN TWE MINIMUM IMPACT HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT APN 27.9 - 111 -07 A. Recitals. (1) Davis Development has filed an application for the approval of Development Review No. 87 -56 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On the 22nd of June, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and contipued it to the July 13th regular meeting to allow the applicant to work with Staff in resolving design issues for the office entry for the three buildings. (iii) On the 13th d&y of July, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and included said meeting on that date. AVIL (iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolutioi, cave occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, t!�:, ermined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence, presented to this C *mission during the above- referenced meetings on June 22, and July 13, 1988, including . written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The app,-;cation applies to property located at south west corner of Jersey Boulevard and Rochester Avenue with a street frontage of 1215 feet and lot depth e` 286 feet and is presently vacant; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is vacant the property to the south is 3 warehouse buildings, the property to the east is vacant and the property to the west is vacant; and p PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -96 - DAVIS July 13, 1988 Page 2 0 (c) The proposed site plan, elevations together with the recommended conditions of approval comply with the Industrial Specific Plan and all other applicable regulations. 3. dased uprn the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting and' upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan and Industrial Specific Plan; and (b) That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Industrial Specific Plan and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and (c) That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan; and (d) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable there -o, will be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. This Co m;ssion hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and ccnsidere4 in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the finings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached! Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division 1. Al walls, such as retaining walls, decorative walle, screen walls, and flood walls shall be of decorative material such as split face block masonry or concrete, consiste; ;t with the building material. 2. The final design of the flood wal': along Jersey Boulevard and Rochester Avenue shall be subject to City 'Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 3. All open fence shall be of wrought iron or other decorative material instead of chain link fence. 4. All drive :gay entrys shall have texture pavement such as brick pavers, exposed aggregate concrete, a combination of them, or other similar materials as approved by City P1 r� PLANNING CwOSION RESOLUTION NO. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -56 - DAVIS July 13, 1988 Page 3 S. Pedestrian connection and walkway shall be of texture pavement such as exposed aggregate, brick pavers, a combination of them, or other materials as approved by the City Plr. ,7er. 6. Additional pedestrian ammonites such as seating benches, tables, potted plants shall be provided within the plaza area and she patio area. Eiral design shall be sUbJect to City Planner °•.view and approval prior to issuance of building pemit. 7. All project entrys shall have special landscape treatment such as specimen size trees, accent trees and increased number of trees, shrubs, etc. 8. hedgerow shall . provided to screen parking spaces along Jersey Boulevard, Rochester Avenue and the proposed new street along the western boundary. 9. Landscaping shall be provided .along the 5 foot setback area of the south property boundary. 10. ThA removal of thb " mature Eucalyptus trees and the 3 mature WalnLt trees saia'0 be replaced with • „ne largest nursery grown trees available on a one for one basis, as determined by the City Planner. li.. The existing Olive trees shall be preserved by relocatiFiq to the permament location within the site to be indicated on the landscape plans. A relocation tree pla4, thAt shows the oermament location for the Olive trees, the method of protecting the trees during construction phase, shall be submitted to the City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of any permits. 12. The final color scheme for the three (3) buildings shall be submittQ� for resign Review Committee review and approval prior to issuance of building permit. Engineering Division. 1. A written agreement or easement for Shared ue of the existing driveway on Rochester Avenue shall be obtained from a property owner to the south prior to the issuance of building permit. 2. Off -site construction easements shall be obtained from properties to the north, west, and south where needed prior to the issuance of the building permit. 3. A good faith effort shall be made to obtain an additional 7 feet of street dedication for the half width street alot.g the west site boundary for the full length of the proposed' cul -de -sac (586 feet) from a .property owner to the west prior to the issuance of the building permit. I In -, J PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTIC,i, n0. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87-55 - DAVIS July 13, 1988 Page 4 4. Construction Of the portion of the half width street aloi;g the crest site boundary south of this site shall be coordinated with the property owner to the south. S. Extend storm drain in xhe proposed cul -de -sac to the Intersection with Jersey t1juifevard. install inlet structur¢� as determined by the final drainage study. 6. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications) on the project site of Rochester Avenue shall bQ uidergrounded from the first pole on the north side of Jersey Boulevard to the first pole off -site south of the project south boundary; pr ior to public improvement acceptance or, occupancy, which ever occurs first. In addition, an in lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the utilities on the opposite side of Rochester Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of the building permit. The fee shall be one half the difference between the undergounding cost of the utilfties (electrical) on the opposite side of the street minus those (telecoir „unications) on the project site times the length from the center of Jersey Boulevard to the south project bcundary.. 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall cart 1�0 adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF JULY, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tarry ATTEST: Bra a er, epu y ecre ary �''° I, t3r&d Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cufawionga, do hereby certif, that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopt, :d by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held an the 13th day of July, 1988, . by the following Vote -to -will AYES! COMMT*_+SIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: it r 71 1] U C° 4 N 4-o off G L tl$�� W� Y q ;x3 °NMI DIY 1�YL o��•. $$ia�w"tl'v3y$r�zg 4NV 61 VYY tlt s,^�q,� fit .. N) � w o � h N a V' u � a e wq �• L E.4 i or +Y {� °Y" "ag a° �y`a a Y �.e�. �� • � O $��NYY �!G $ g CH-W On Is 0 d its YY i §' 4^s Y y Y ou o °a 'b ors E`- yO y itl. "spY •6 t E uy a! P L tl Y�gtlC. ® � Quality ` O $�`Y ��My 15-1 pp6 pf: '.G �~tl'S 9�� 0^eC VtttlL 6 CV ^�.4G 4 tl� L 4 ^` � N 4C S y` Y� Mg le M GGG 91 v Y 1 4 1i N 4-o off G L tl$�� W� Y q ;x3 °NMI DIY 1�YL o��•. $$ia�w"tl'v3y$r�zg 4NV 61 VYY tlt s,^�q,� fit .. N) � w o � h N a V' u � a e wq �• L E.4 i or +Y {� °Y" "ag a° �y`a a Y �.e�. �� • � O $��NYY �!G $ g CH-W On Is 0 d its YY i §' 4^s Y y Y ou o °a 'b ors E`- yO y itl. "spY •6 t E uy a! P L tl Y�gtlC. V W 3 MI r O O Y N 918 ova N L p L N L O _Y _ w N q N ' ' —o yi pp g q�Yf `SMA anZ" `.1 s 0z �ie v a, O p_ LV N� $g«.S 5C pgc� 0 84 �0 ^g 'fig L yO N -�■�LZ yOy'— qwC C Lat�p6 Its w "NZ 1O >e �a�a* WoU23 YBB + cp Vi ay' ^KM trOg'.01 V!L IZIM 46" N 1aa. t i�M J■ g1y qqq M� ^-1xv " ` w r Ott 31=12 -g g'r X M 40s %AtI Vv 'sL y ■Cp R OV N <r V ♦♦ Y � O B Y N 00 Y P CI OI y per• `. _e °g_ R I Y V Y 3i; _a Qc� 3p,N Ls L$•• 01n.Q L L ^_ q L riwa a 1 qQ V N C M• � Y� �y L C rl�IYV VQa `�FO O4 yQ• gal '47 �e i °rta _ � 1 01 e� 6� 1 7612 P ppp� V y 8^ ppL � C w�° a Y =r 4 e e `a a 3 V g Zi `w N� ip w 3 YYC V R �a e Y N M {� CCC V M- L _a V `�� -))_ s! 44s LY gN ILI dr`Z'aeale'.�JTr S x' N?^ qp fig N N Y S ssV er �ljp,y�+ Ly yY V C � N �9 gg 4q O� =AS •� w 6 L OI.i jib; 9 �r I► i O a'^�• i r D — i� 0 aq q M «s Sr N` V W ..Q n� O 6 O C } qqe 4 p 4' N Mq+ Y P� N 6� �I I y fl t. V ills VIA r� P► x X. q4s• u w _a 6Z a d� Y.q C. � OVl��C Z V� N 4°j.y �'M.' V6aogi:CY� O POGO V V Y .O LL N Y LL Q Y y U YiM C:w r�1 <6V. N D w 'NI N W l u -g g'r X M 40s %AtI Vv 'sL y ■Cp R OV N <r V ♦♦ Y � O B Y N 00 Y P CI OI y per• `. _e °g_ R I Y V Y 3i; _a Qc� 3p,N Ls L$•• 01n.Q L L ^_ q L riwa a 1 qQ V N C M• � Y� �y L C rl�IYV VQa `�FO O4 yQ• gal '47 �e i °rta _ � 1 01 e� 6� 1 7612 P ppp� V y 8^ ppL � C w�° a Y =r 4 e e `a a 3 V g Zi `w N� ip w 3 YYC V R �a e Y N M {� CCC V M- L _a V `�� -))_ s! 44s LY gN ILI dr`Z'aeale'.�JTr S x' N?^ qp fig N N Y S ssV er �ljp,y�+ Ly yY V C � N �9 gg 4q O� =AS •� w 6 L OI.i jib; 9 �r I► i O a'^�• i r D — i� 0 aq q M «s Sr N` V W ..Q n� O 6 O C } qqe 4 p 4' N Mq+ Y P� N 6� �I I y fl t. V ills VIA r� P► x X. q4s• u w _a 6Z a d� Y.q C. � OVl��C Z V� N 4°j.y �'M.' V6aogi:CY� O POGO V V Y .O LL N Y LL Q Y y U YiM C:w r�1 <6V. N D p. VsbL a. °ao �o b'. $C 0y LLYC pbaQuanty Lv IL 5 YL Otl N. My y7b bLQ101 G.�OA S4 .�•�YOV wtS ■vyL� "Mgt r SOyLy Pill tl i.ri.e O ; 'O ter.$ N Ems. . N x cc V V tl O L uN =e. » u L pY aOR T, Im. C �1 ON N y 4 W S w A� ». C^ V� N LPN V% C w 'a� _- M g N O O �• S g pY� Y Y� Y C cvt cL�ic Xo.i '^ ILLY Y¢ _� i `oa .�'°.gwoi— $ �48xv 3r p■q 3 -°. = "e_Liuyra$[�NCC^ '4��e NSs$Z' C. irty�>Y y_-q ON flIb oQ YCtl YM 'tltl� ati �Y ` 'N QO) ~.N •1wf0 y�. Y MNL ---:- g Ny4 p0 �NF 7.:1;!5`54 M �. NIA a-4 .LyQp - IL'. gY.'9q .2S 3 N N6YO H 'C6gY Lw. NC b� m.E NYY r�.as° NO VIr.�MM • Ya N qN - Q tl+ �'^ eCN YNJ Hi i N ,6 w�{� p p•p� ugYa p p ! ■Y O aY01 N `607 C C i ?,a +LY O ^C y a a 6 N q y d 0• 5Y el gLO. C ^arse Y. - ..13 °�c�tl, Y°. � gllybza Za !gip b�p A3 ^ CCp '�• Y tl �� 0Y tlb G ®.r G= VOO °'LLF c� Y7 Yy �!i yQ.O� NT�p, Vlb V s L 0YY� a ` Y ^ Y 6S p ! Q tlY Q r�r C CN. • PI H y0a b }« u b M aJ` u c q O� Y O^ w v� N tl -i`^ tl Y o $v aN.riL R- 9Y q�` ONp T li, Ali d 4vws ydR; 3 `. _. N y b CL�ar: �``�. cwt °' Ps aaw —� rt�* L+yy'+1to L C ---v p aC c�CC pv YL p 0.41 ` C tl� i �� N: Y _ Z, C O q V -0 V fill, .% Y O _N Y C ^� N•' �� M O �YNjy iii Yip�p. �++'��O�I OY 9•y -°�.N YYY.Ow { USE �'�NC 7 `"-' MV �� NA db OL 9,N - `-C CK'^ if ...�$�. E is Ka g ■y N 6.'O roN..Y rjp� crILS A C M x 4 cy d. S _� Ovn �r+ Beer YL2 Y412 E� r '�LI Y{� 6cc Y YQ V �« �Rt. V V r W Y!yv Y g V LCN ilt -aft s $ q N u V CG O 121 Us AN- A3 A3 ficb* MOO 54-,' '. ;:&1-.1 Q pY y+�N Cqpp N�♦♦ 4` goYy Y. x..q ^^ j 4 I I � Qpu(it V.CCN ec 0• LY y % 6Ctl c M ^�W� liO . O0 � y�yu Vi f.i^ >t„`�"w w� V ++ 2+x4 Pi W •� gVly + =as ,r E.3-22 a 4. v ..��Y •$#�.d 13_d : 3cP = N C N 2i Z Z= � ■. S.!-. Or ^A $Its P Y40� ca. Z s Ask bt O + 9?i 6 Y Sao s�Y 0L 4�g i� QZ Pr D �`Y C Sa q °ss YY q4. P D�` �. pyLp Y QN Mi +1 y. ^` L� C ilNYX�YO gOo� rgq.6N' `{ryQpp41.'Y Sw 41 V � • N 7 de O N ^� � -' O 41 owu wa low YEp A � L $e &tea bo- ash + vx2�_= N y � CC R ' V is C W SAS .t{.s N` g: r OV Tim 9 9C w yyyI w'^ 1, v i � v. W V`' yyML �yy Nra� rM �° O` }g W r C t t7 m 1 1 d N o "glual Per � afl Cj` L,7 ya Zl� �saMg► wOO. L�. itt M0.. Op� L r (¢A+ - -L« Q j'�N Yt�fMN qY�Y l\ LLO� Y �i A Y c GV > §S; 4V~ O �' .2 uYu INS sa 6p a a �Nw b N pL cYUC CrL OCcY pw qy0.V �N�6 KOV ^�gq ON� o�.'.O YY NP pay a YN�V1aY g "V'. 38C i e jyY O `gCgCgC^ wg�1�« Y« a a S Z 4 YSVMe, y ai am S N � O y°�y� gg• � 4��:! �a f s Sal al 1 \g VYq 0.► OW _z= 9M�wN TL 3 2r�'A M. $22 D�a v L.o gp�e �i« ■ w �i^� �i �. '� `Y o eq zip D fa a •n,Z( N N�. ��~ Y� r. �OSe` y��S ~•°Q.:� TI Y Y }� q It's all a ail 5e`�' ~c^�i =� d.N ` „ .. yoAsk '(aa�.. k Lg r�OV g i 2p ~ l Y ■yq�)V �Vu$t_•N V.2 V_ W V u 6 eps� M an tE y °� ft u Y L<uuY Nr>O VOI vpyy L ge ^^ IWO AL u A p e p IF Y e 'i tl. f ~. �.;i .V. « S 83RD �`s NIS Z.8ee P �e a Vt O..u.a =, a ys Z3 Nqx us `^ r» �y C OYr� tir yYy V Wig 1� E °� 6 '9529 wag ' >�.+ S ` $m t m $e �e *t » �r s �e s Spi I if $ $vp 4 bnr`d�t a act P it U. Mai fi..$ et's TL <Ls ®�� I Y b M � W � L ^ a Y cc� v � N V� C �r W a N Yv� 4Y p CL <�{ W 1 V Vr rY OLY' Y uu dw p� o ag :aalt M g� g8 Y aW Po O �JI N��tA YI GoO L^ >p. {ggF. ec U^i �JYC$g x8 wVs No T C r �O VV r�N O r > epp C C t GpO 9 j,s �l N J: SO Vr rY OLY' Y L. b M :aalt Sze i A.N.._65 Po O �JI N��tA YI GoO L^ >p. {ggF. ec U^i �JYC$g x8 T twu is.: all j,s Zs— ti. e4E�� \� Y.14 Y tN y� N C° Aw yyNy y4r��^ L.p. ° � O --bra NL' qY �y Y4y C 1 t0 Im i N� e L ^Vat F M M ntl Nay NY N. M J O j� pp a OOO yy Ni Y o�j TO� M 7 tl V fi2F� G. a@,a L� v M MC q o�2L y M «� Nr a� �u2L �yM ~ 0 L i � o�qq y NR' Y ♦� � y _M tl i �y. icps u tl ,a� u pto Y^ �' Y 1S4 Oy0 101.. r aO ^4 V Ly 44 L �tl i+0i� b A a I > w y a 4 i Y L V 9y 'v M yys awe �: N q N ItsN o yyyyyy J. N L N 3 $v N 4 Mca� -S IJ- Y § Y L c a� ♦♦V ° s d V Y ^. v� i i N� ^Vat F M M ntl Nay NY N. M J O j� pp ®K ^� o�j TO� M 7 tl V 4 M MC q 1 Y y M «� Nr �yM ~ 0 L i � o�qq y NR' Y ♦� � y _M tl i �y. icps u tl 101.. r ay N a > w y a 4 Y N q N o i N� ^Vat F 6Y y M J O j� pp ®K ^� ^� T i a 7 V M q 1 Y y M «� Nr i � o�qq y NR' Y ♦� 4'JL 9. Zdti h=N:p i N� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAtiiONGA *(,- STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUEJECT: July 13;.1988 Chairman and MkeWbVS of the Planning Commission Brad duller, City Planner Nancy Form, Assatiate Planner 0.37 acres of land located at 7810 Haven e eve oilmen o a re a tore totaling 3,000 square feet on the Ger-eral Commercial Distr;ct, anue - APR 1077- 401 -37. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION. A. Action Roque sted: Approval of the Detailed Site Plan,, eleva;. ons;: an ssuasce of a Negative Declaration. 9. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: r - 0 eer rile . anne , re ention,pond; Flood Control District. South East - Virginia Dare Center; General - 'commercial District. - Future Terra Vista Towne Center any Office park; West - Deemer CoMmercial Flood},Cor.wrol #DiS�:ic District. C. General Project Plan Desi.aati -ins: e - North remora o- obercial. - Flood Control. South - General Commercial. East = Co�rmunity Commercial, office. West - Flood Control. D. Site Characteristics: The site is the last building pad of the s er situ is Plan or a runswick/Deer Creel: Shopping Center. The rough gelded with turf as erosion control. Street Improvements and landscaping alo7g Ha,en Avenue are completed. E. Parking Calculations: Type Number of Number of Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Re fired Provided Retail 3,000 11250 12 12 ITEM Q PLANNING COMMISSI0: STAFF REPORT RE: OR 87 -57 July 13, 1988 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS• A. General: The proposed Si�?;a Plan is in conformance with the approved ;Raster Plan. According tc the applicant, they have obtained verbal agreement from the Flood Control District to allow them to landscape along the Flood Control easement. The proposed elevations are consistent •with the architectural style established in the center and cos }ttains subtle variations to some of the architectural-elements. B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Tolstoy, BT la es ey, o eman 'an-June 16,. 1968 reviewed the proposed project an recctmaended approval. ' C. Environmental Assessment: Staff has completed Part II of the nvironmen a ist and found that no significant adverse impacts will occur as a result of this project. If the Ptarining Commission concurs, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: A. The project is consistent with the General Plan and the ;lurpose of the district in which the site is located. B. The-use and Site Plan together with the conditions appl.';able thereto will not be detrimental to the public health, sa,Fety, ar welfare, or materially injurious to properties.,, or improvements in the vicinity. C. The proposed use and Site Plan together frith the recominen0ed Conditions of Approval are is compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. V. RECOMMENDATION., Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve eve opment Review 87 -57 and issue a Negative Declaration. Resp lly s fitted, /Bra er d City Pl nner C':NF :ko 0 11 «< �m \�. Ift .�.$ . y . /mom #�« Site- PO . . a .��,.° / A�� ` «� ®- ` g« !# \! eee « A k` \ %� °t m #li` 03 \. SSE? U$iI1Z$t3 ma r a �I F-'� detailed site plan NTU b CITY OF R.ANC]E CtrAMONGA MANNUN C,; MISON ► an � 1 .. umm[.,P serrn.oew a�.r.r • lwr iwrrra"'"'� -G t itt1l3?iq Q rmr fm -7.,Ywr we low . (i mom wear. waft �j• // 4~ jowrswft� /� SMe1R Mfr MAP rMw. MM CXW*n pia mw. y o Mons �wseis aw+.w..amma, o F-'� detailed site plan NTU b CITY OF R.ANC]E CtrAMONGA MANNUN C,; MISON � �°� � � � Iry w►r Q u+ar d —W ua Fe— wa�i�aav�wo. i w PAW was on— O ww iar r► U �• .; .�• O Mir wWasvv MARW gafQ gib 8aodai CrC aca➢ix:IF6 -*AD LAM A mm fw ! ••r PAY 'd �. %! E aRla►L NPRa[i_ ccnceptu$d grading plan a o .t t YV 1 i , �' '� �l �� f a � ii '�jt`�R}!' � �3� � 1 �, , - � � • �� .� t �1`�� `v all � k r � ° � ,Z �'� R s! � 1��1�� w �� I. i �I !t a C �` }� �� r taY�� 1 . tia , �'— r...... .l�'. � _ s.-. t ti 5" 1 t � '! �r •. � y �y .. R h �"� x. 4 l -:,. Z YF.t1 ;: Y�• .,a ,� 1 r �. , � ti'p,` � t . � � .� � �.- .1; M � ��Y � �,. �` *R' ' ��L 4 � i� 4 � ,may ,z. 4 !•� -.'. w. t° F yi ♦ .q w �. t °.� '. '.� �. �f � .. 1 It f:7 �l 1 f � l �1 �4A .. C� .° 'r �. t1 �1 e�. ''e• R � . RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUT ON OF "T'k :RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNIKIG' COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 87 -57 FCR A 3,000 SQUARE FOOT RETAIL BUILDING ON 0,37 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED AT 7510 HAVEN AVENUE IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISYRICT A. Recitals. (i) Wolfe /Lang /Christr�' �r has filed an application for, the approval of Development Review No. bi -57 as described in the title of thi Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On the 13th day of July, 1988, the PI -nninq Commission of the r'ty of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. this Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts . set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon subsfan¢ial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referencett eeting or July 13, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, this Carnal. on hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application apples to property located at with a street frontage of 183.7 feet and is presently vacant; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is Deer Creek Channel and retention pond, the property tc the south of that site consists of the Virginia Dart, Business dark, the property to the east is vacant, and the propel " to the west is a flood channel. 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during tie above - referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 110. RE• DR 87 -57' July 13, 198E' Page 2 (b) Tha the proposed use is in accord with the objec;fve of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in whit!% the site is located; and (c) Thitt the proposeo use is in compliance viith each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and (d) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considereL in compliance with the California Environmental .Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Fegative Declaration, 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Ittached Standar0 Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reftrEnce. Planning Division: (1) All exterior building materials ai +d colors shall be consistent with the Brunswick /Deer Creek Center. (2) Any proposed signs shall be in conformance with the approved Uniform Sign Program for the Brunswickf0eer Creek Center. (3) Legal documentation from the San Bernardino County ,Mood Control District allowing the developer to lease the 12 -foot right -cf- way, including the authorization to landscape a portion of the laased area shall be submitted to the Planning Bivt < m prior to, i!,suance of building pemctts. (4) The existing Eucalyptus windrow should be re- located to within the leased San Bernardino County Flood Control land. En ineeri g Divisione (1) The existing curve in the north curb of the existing driveway shall be removed and the curb re- constructed to the satisfaction j of the City Engineer. , (2) An in -lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of AW i the existing overhead utilities (electrical, except for the 60a � electrical) on the opposite side of Havpn Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of buildingg permits. The f e shall he one -half the City adopted unit amount for tie difference between the undergroundinq cost of the utilitie2, (;electrical) on the opposite side or the street minus those PLARMING C"ISSION RMILUTIoN N0. RE: DR 87-57 Page 33, 1988 ,l (previously undergroupd �d,tPlephonr on the length from the ce;zer Of Deer CreeL ha Rely eotithe Pro$ect's southern boundary (approximately 284 f"ti. 6• The solut ion. Secretary a:loption of this Resolution., this COWssion 'shall certii'Y to the APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF JULY, 1988, PLANNING C01 lISSIOh! OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOK A 8Y: armn ATTEST: a er, epu Y ecre ry d 19 a Brad culler, .IFepu10 Secretary of the Planning Commission of the C of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby, Certify that the foregoing R•so[u�ian was f•uiyand re yiarly Intro WC passed and adopted by the Planni;ig '1,10P lion of the AWAk Cit of Rancho Gu. amonga, at a re ¢alai m on the Ran day of July, 1988 b g eting -.of the Plarning COmflission'hel'd Y ttig dal 1 owi ng Vote -to -roam; AYES: COMMISSIONERS; I NOES: COWISSIOWERS: AJ3SENT: COWISSIONERS: t� u Y$ ga4i ;Sax m xx oYO cw. M EZ p C �'L� `• Y'.11 S� mb N i ^� o�t a2ii.43`.4 M V - Z O G 2Nx3 c oN s + LNY i :! N ^Y�ISS -.33 N 5 gY Y��4�uS O 6 0:441 "A pw Quaty L e CC LS Y°. .AQ �. i ILIA MSS Ws LO.a S Ask Oc�P �4j CG Qy�p� �GU MG• Y Y�vCC.� Cy� �YSYp.�O YYwY. Vt'r`�p 1q. •.LTiYq i.i Y.. as a,, �g�Y ZAA +YO6G e gso Sao 3`gRC`o �..6 y�� Yi iyl,•� C�� wpp�N � all V «Crpy� +N� CN! tl1�s V�o C ➢M`ILy ®MMMw6 N Y LL yy� os 9. '1 + i $ NGYY' �N..G. , pp` . _��S •YO OYOQ ��i6�r y� 6 grilal g g N i •. � y.. h M i ,q a Ra L i ALM Q. IL mo i E$ 9 O � � L� V }' e Yw� Y V•r N VY. tl p OM' M� +Ouga�i0 tfi Y iY[ of S ti'�OC�lV Y�C 4�i0voi+.2 w.aC +n+ • E I 0 x w d ilc <A=`ao AC� a CY�q. r�Y•Y 03 v$s. -r�ir rc� a ..$�ii aiNy$l` �w G�y��Y rMV L «=.�i u• •r. �.Y ��e gM O � ' � 6 <Y � Y[NR •i'b rC 4SgS= ��j M � �Y«a Cwq. :•�+ Yf N s 51 > >p op8 —Siff ts 6 4i 1 rr o. J w 1�OV yA 0-..6 I. - wp w �ggNm py yaC'VN. ®by Q6 L. yW�p1'ep3YpNV i 3jai r 0 ®r 9` y,�M ev 1�. �e� L" °,�c� o ♦C4 �y <y^q• N yt O .q A G1w =A�'C YmmC� y .U�46 y a i 1�C �° 1} . ' V0 O {` � y.Gp wVncC.d Mw . 'N^� M w °v � O � _ A _ . � w Ja yyyL L �yN V ' p.g _r ^�� . � $aN w 'C. �N\L ^ `� 2 r � ' G O g ° KpS �Y ' r �Y °wwa �° 1 �.1y YLYYY3 `'piY9q" . ".G pA O C ' � � � ] wY �C juv V Y� 4± !1g wF•gY�V['.. �.. L � jy 6� ■y l� i+ f� 1 . _ ^<^ N !. Y •r y u^ m ■Lp • . a�Oy � �J yG i •6 y yGy Ly •u 9 �*14VN J — 2 � : ANi w {b —'�1 y ` iGV Yq-� OV y O y ~ g N MCyO,�� c GAM L4r gN --,iC i t l c 4 : 11 i silo! f-14 YA Kill BH Ay Y �B/�Tb mageI . �.yA L C p 0 S. . , tSgywL 1 CV R �As�3 a$� i �g�r A YC Y� i °vc aQ "rs a r ig. C. rg�� M YNYpp G Y a� V'q4® ii e y «p rsil� Yi4 �p $. C yY� saar,a I 33r_ �ws�� I ilc <A=`ao AC� a CY�q. r�Y•Y 03 v$s. -r�ir rc� a ..$�ii aiNy$l` �w G�y��Y rMV L «=.�i u• •r. �.Y ��e gM O � ' � 6 <Y � Y[NR •i'b rC 4SgS= ��j M � �Y«a Cwq. :•�+ Yf N s 51 > >p op8 —Siff ts 6 4i 1 rr o. J w 1�OV yA 0-..6 I. - wp w �ggNm py yaC'VN. ®by Q6 L. yW�p1'ep3YpNV i 3jai r 0 ®r 9` y,�M ev 1�. �e� L" °,�c� o ♦C4 �y <y^q• N yt O .q A G1w =A�'C YmmC� y .U�46 y a i 1�C �° 1} . ' V0 O {` � y.Gp wVncC.d Mw . 'N^� M w °v � O � _ A _ . � w Ja yyyL L �yN V ' p.g _r ^�� . � $aN w 'C. �N\L ^ `� 2 r � ' G O g ° KpS �Y ' r �Y °wwa �° 1 �.1y YLYYY3 `'piY9q" . ".G pA O C ' � � � ] wY �C juv V Y� 4± !1g wF•gY�V['.. �.. L � jy 6� ■y l� i+ f� 1 . _ ^<^ N !. Y •r y u^ m ■Lp • . a�Oy � �J yG i •6 y yGy Ly •u 9 �*14VN J — 2 � : ANi w {b —'�1 y ` iGV Yq-� OV y O y ~ g N MCyO,�� c GAM L4r gN --,iC i t l c 4 : 11 i silo! f-14 YA Kill BH Ay Y �B/�Tb mageI . �.yA L C p 0 S. . , tSgywL 1 CV R O a ^sv V C6 C6 O92M, O O�W YLwS nC�aY C 3LYCV NG C V S p y wOw p 1- O c Y �1 O ■ Q O t 1 + YL «a�1� YN Y CY �e ^YO. Y�^ m ^y rC�� CC� VqC � •C�1 r Y�. ^.N �M O Old d GQ COLCYCYq •��' !'�S O O N C fir. M C Y G i O1^ i O N 9 a ^•rSsN O u0 p0 VwOO�Y ^jbjyq 1w Cv•'l V. o rS •i gL L si,� B- ysp�{w1y N....a �+"y VVY> �w. s �•°u_ °s Ny161 V,'yYy� _� «q YEN }�. .re.��00 %�Y•�'�. �Y�.YN �Y�T bhp OMNY Y apoV 4�+f �„YIY�.:•'lpF�'+�"�r' °s •'Tc p 1 0n� ySr `"�NN0.�''"33 jS3g ar $2sai �^ • t YO M giY Y °`0 `5' 7 "1`' `oN °o ^ °^pg."��ie Ms 31$ a i1 31f+y� � �i�� Y O O Ni L1sy 6�!wCp! yYy1 C N.V> �2 ia�i L cS Y�., LL+- .osvoN �. -p�'� N '4 .. _ �p Y �q1 i p ±Vbb 100�r -Yq GiB a�"'N�Y �.l� �Y`y�Otf �1� 3 11 R. gag; O•.., �I Y'. y! �sV gC''p�aN`{.�� 1 C_r `> Y•NN «y.V M O r L Ca�+CY .N N�NgN 4'N� •CN M �.w. O)i~^O � JS:.•. N i MNO N Y yy R .3ivv r: Y w N e eM� s'+3ee C � YY� I ^cc� ^9 �V >SO aq Ca Ri R a Y [� G�CC ®.p 1.. • C 1A•r S N YyO NCB a3s osp.t� _� «■ O q L�� q w M 3 w C> V guz eQ� LOS Y iv.N9 44w:® a V4!� p C, i� 0 a IS Y �A p w 3, P Ia• R^ Y p Y 5 c G 6 r s� y _ or u s L w g N Y C q Y 4 U p Y Y N O OlL za C � N d r L � x� ai u wQ 7� {4 M v U >b 46 C L S •C� M M a s C Qv` ��g S lK, Ea > C �GL Y L' L N V Y V C .aC `yy9 Y O « L C + "• Y FLLnv♦y��. -c E Y HO CZ ro 6 5� p: ` O :8 C O u «r S" wg. V O n Ys f 3� Y r L N D 4a f pb w A IM € r« « C 6- -d p V +D obYN Y. � 111Iiii�iiN v �qe �� ggqpp � N v e W :mzppr" n MqS .EVE .Cu;t1-_, � n pNp CY■■�P 6 w av M ra�ga'� gY N v s� Net 'e7 Lw. yy _y C«q e y��ic «rte d n V L Wm6S�wOi+o NI Ll v El. �� o =r � eEx s vag or gill YaY.yyV °'�. Fly gZ; a ,� 5 $pad �sq`o o�S`ys� 'se�' ®" '�� yE$Y� q g8o 4�0 e•°si w°� oa'i `'3 yC06 w�fj.3 ��V,..+ d. U.O. 61 W Y�_qq» «�Q`d �O.qY J { yy 9y y d 4+ Yfp ^a� 15 to: Y y . g�A J. NMI �j O jqqyy. yy q {, 3pyp� _ T. .3n .°.,, + ie C »Y} Y Q � .:NCI �$a rl y '� Y V A Y N N Yp► cN r' d q y M �• 63'i ig9 �+L V L i. sit Rat +_ Ay�Y1 1 �m g �}r � Nn«c ♦ w. c Ya ��'� F, 6 r o € �M vq yVV�� 6 x }V $ a ►i � I Ta y�$ . ■Q?$ ` N 1vayy r: Yt.L s Y s N Y b Y b {• {� � i sitLupo :C1M V�j g1� d��. L� �s© •�a� u": bm was ^y yY 31 N �+ �CCCCCC � = `� � • o � e,�. � ° $ a v V RV 23^ 4'C0C4 »r � b QO'rQ' to +.{..�N6 O w « yu A y R r w � s U x a vo iJi c 4 A�* f i 6'wD+ u� M CI M� L > w4� 4w� t� ikr e K y q �Dy L d�Y RC rw��p Crqy Y 1r OG� Y A-0 a c, =G a e i D D � Y V >1D �w dVD a Y C b � Y ti u O �w L a aL� �Yw c� wre N� ae 7� 4 w� u p+ L Y • L ��pypj A Y .r b b� M w b•. M� w 5 w N A �i M V Cr ro Y Y ... atl >, � ,a w 0 C .•� a b M wMY.�T� c. 7 mas'i t?'D Drx w cum w _ O Y> w w• M Ot fi M L C y M p t 4 V s« R zu `O Q 6Ni� OrY� b w�IYY • a C N.QrCC V.•Y Disc � N y C* I Kq4 Y091i Y � Y C C A •7 H-1 tyPr Q� O D !V re ai ae 7� 4 w� u p+ L Y • L ��pypj A Y .r b b� M w b•. M� w 5 w N A �i M V Cr ro Y Y ... atl _4„ a tea« YCLbyY $' Tj e up` =w6 G M�g� � w..0.yy 1•A� 4� d •Z YMly?'yp��t �M4� ��3�• qy Y D�•Fpp`� UU.Y ,.��(DjSy � �4y�4 *• ., ;may, Yl�.�. �g o$ b C. L � �'i Y � �� tR R iAy � 'f! • " 4 N 4! ��[( L M CC �" L. « qtw f4 .L@ � is QCC V V � L L`•' $ g,Y Q r V Q. y" y t'+8t Vy N a o Hun v .Y. c V 4 6 O G N L 81 Sr ^ r� mV RM t:N Ov1. 1. C Qom° G 4 V $M a t $ .Ga ; Qy �pC 4 .".r0 �POO ^°•. fr. r.D gam' yy D'} A »XML tiNw �Q w47t4u t°-g-B a ��y)i, lf�q a.,p yff x -y�{ cw W v�Q a' Ay� .. Cp AM M VL L� O CiwY y. l51M t¢ 4�y�4 f• O >kC�O l~Y11y G � Mrl•YIM aQY �.� dYptl C N gyp. w,•. a .+s. N 4 M w U1,01-3 LAN Y� M1 4 ro LL4. V 1., D r" 4tl'ISt it�G� -A y.4 'gt•4.ut Mkt L�L�. QM I•` w �c 4Ci 'S U- �rV >, M jNroa c. N _ O Y> w w• M Ot fi M L M 4 V s« R zu _4„ a tea« YCLbyY $' Tj e up` =w6 G M�g� � w..0.yy 1•A� 4� d •Z YMly?'yp��t �M4� ��3�• qy Y D�•Fpp`� UU.Y ,.��(DjSy � �4y�4 *• ., ;may, Yl�.�. �g o$ b C. L � �'i Y � �� tR R iAy � 'f! • " 4 N 4! ��[( L M CC �" L. « qtw f4 .L@ � is QCC V V � L L`•' $ g,Y Q r V Q. y" y t'+8t Vy N a o Hun v .Y. c V 4 6 O G N L 81 Sr ^ r� mV RM t:N Ov1. 1. C Qom° G 4 V $M a t $ .Ga ; Qy �pC 4 .".r0 �POO ^°•. fr. r.D gam' yy D'} A »XML tiNw �Q w47t4u t°-g-B a ��y)i, lf�q a.,p yff x -y�{ cw W v�Q a' Ay� .. Cp AM M VL L� O CiwY y. l51M t¢ 4�y�4 f• O >kC�O l~Y11y G � Mrl•YIM aQY �.� dYptl C N gyp. w,•. a .+s. N 4 M w U1,01-3 LAN Y� M1 4 ro LL4. V 1., D r" 4tl'ISt it�G� -A y.4 'gt•4.ut Mkt L�L�. QM I•` w �c 4Ci 'S U- �rV 1giWn'. }6 ya C+ G 13 Y IV Gµ �A N■ �tltl $ �� MH L` ck 112 tc w Q » R'Mi ear, - fi .'^..` lei ]. ra�i, }cgs � A� A4 AS A� Ky 1.4 1 tt r p� 4 J s M y4 L w� �5 riq _G Y 'x • m Y O 8 s .i N » Lam ti a Ws 3a : Y wp NC i lit;M as Cn r it N • q � e I e E38 8 la »SiN Ny O a h ri r!) J 4 4 a� +l o L 411 wad _s Y Y� M T O YK tug■ p Qs N0. r a ax Avg t�e ��' --.= u A . i � L Ise 1.4 2r. R L r A�1iL 'O f S (. sr HS- M 5-1 9 74 w s L Qw �o Gc ag U Y wq A� COQ E Y C G P 0.G G C V �a fs. LA Pi: ~p�ii 3^ O ♦w' Cp. Y 1Wt 1Si py� Y O F ti N w L :4 OMO Q wNv a � 8 u �A x1 a� a Q w' Y N � Z � 44Y r Q C Q L V W a� aN R E 1 V Uap4 Q�! Fi'yy � y d y�xy y. Py 4 r E� ��w 1 1 Y ~ `wQ A N SIX z� I G ' _ ' gail 0 va g c k ` ` ^ l cs8 k ina �pq. M y yy syv' i �i V 5 b E E ' 1 <w 4 4 � ' 1w Y Y � � Y i • • " N i.i V > > Y " N 1 yY M MMM Y Y�.Q l t1tKti0 V lie 4 4A VIR~yVV� 3 3y3CC ° °LwM N N c Y YY A ACT ` a apQ I i Y S Y Yw ~ M t E El — CITii Q- RANCHO CUCA:Mk)NGA STA" REPORT D.iE: June 22, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: William J. Silva, Deputy City Engineer BY: Betty hiller, Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: MINOR, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87-64 APPEAL - B!iTLaR - An appeal of a Condition it��i� Approval requ r ng ns a at on of a pedestrian accessway to Bear Gulch School from the project site, located oil the south side of Foothill Boulevard east of Vineyard Avenue - APN 208- 192 -10 I. ABSTRACT: The applicant is requesting that the Planning Commission delete t e Condition of Approval requiring than a pedestrian accessway be provided from the south boundary of the project to Bear Gulch School. II. BACKGROUND: The proposed project consists of the construction of a 600 square moot storage building in the parking tot of Pepperwood Apartments. The project location ' shown on Exhit! "A" along with the ;•tatus of development ;n the are_ The oroject site plan is shown on Exhibit "B°. The sin.• a Condition of Approval was established by staff and presented to the applicant by letter dated Marsh 11, 1988 (see Exhibit "C "), The applicant objected to the c©nditicn ( Exhibit "D") but failed to file his appeal until after the appeal period had expired. Therefore, he has submitted an amendment to the conditions of approval (see Exhibit "E"). III. ANALYSIS: Staff first requested a pedestrian accessway to Bear Gulch School n October 1987. fuch an access wsuld reduce the ;lumber of unnece -nary vehicle trips for parents transporting children to school, and wo provide a shorter, safer route for those ov -1dren currer4ly walking along high traffic Peripheral st,eets, specffically Vineyard Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. The recommendation ua3 based on V:aff's interpretation of the Foothill Specific Plan, assuminr- that elp;ientary school traffic is an imuortant pedestrian Aannectias. Both .tracts adjacent to Rear Gulch $.%ooi, Tracts 12721 and 12835 on Exhibit "A ". were required to provide pedestrian access to the school. The property ow -,r did not agree with staff's recomnendatiun out of concern that it woui, negaMW — affect- his liability insurance,. /0701-02 o 7 -13 -88 PC Ra ndy o 6- of 6 w _� PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MDR 87 -64 Appeal - Butler J1ne 22, 1538 "age 2 i The cond,tions of approval were first presented to the applicant in November 1987, and were revised to their present wording, after discussions with the applicant in December 1987, They formalized were in the approval letter to the applicant on March 11, 1988 (Exhib-it '1C "). The requirement to install the physical improvements is subject to acquisition of an access easement from the property owner to the sdu;;h of this project. Staff is satisfied that the applicant has made a good faith effort to obtain the easement, without success. Therefore, the present condition is that the applicant enter into an agreement with the City to provide tye necessary improvements at such tyre as the City is able to obtain the necessary access rights, It is this condition that the applicant is recomrmending be delt3d. IV. RECOMMENDATION; Staff recommends that the appeal be denied therefore up t ing t e requirement to provide a pedestrian accessway upon future acquisition of the necessary easements by the City;., Respectfully submitted, Ask William J. Silva, P.E. Deputy City Engineer WJS:BM :sd Attachments: Project Location (Exhibit "A") Site Plan (Exhibit "B ") Conditions of Approval (Exhibit "C) Applicant's Appeal Letters (Exhibits I'D" and 'IE") J 8121 ML Alk �y} r°. r ..:rL EP — L I : i . • -, 22163 — —• r' ;, •� It i Fl]1]OO W 1 /�0 iw�i ~: l ... -1 gl'-• L. 6 � rte= -• � ,w,,��,�� J ® ®® ,� m` `I- '1 a 'z0i�' s"'" 3 193 tp�+7 a j L . 3 _ � �F raw u: a n� � It .7 te ��, �� a- �,P �"'» ,- sue•- =.'•__�• i�- � ��yF� � � � t .•',i. 1 _ :t _1 N. °, �� -r_� Syr �l/.(h�/ t �'_ �� f \(_Oj\�• \. ''�l? -�:l' _ __ _ ?• - �� EAtt ( t FlFU f EA1Z &U LX_(4 SO4 _ Fuman - rrEX- Z'I' M PROJECT LOCATION W 11 a (� 8 t ;�,r 2a, ' r I • �� t `�Y' ✓`� . .3 � �'� v¢:oP1e°s. GLpetlr � = "erVtNP%o C vp CAR , r. I Me qI 144— Tw gbm6iz Lce -AT1v4 Access wiy CI "Y OF RANCHO CUCA M NGA � WM Iwc S AVTE PLAN it CITY Y QF itANCHO CUGAASQNGA pose aura 90: 807, itaseho Cu =M0q . CaWmais ¢1730. (7161 489-tB5( March 1.1, 1988 William Oouey Skinner, Bauey, 6artsman 11110 Ohio Avenue, Suite 200 Los Angeles, California 90025 SUBJECT: MINOR DEUELOpMENT 4E IEW 81 -64 Dean Mr. S uey: The Development review process for the above described project has been successfully completed a4l approval has been gr6ntad based upon the following findings and cop1Jtions, 'dank you for your participation and cooperation during this r%Mew process. We .sincerely h,qa that this process has been a positive experience for all involved. ;'This decision shall be effective following a ?0-day appeal period begirrr'rsg with the date of this letter, Findings A. Than the proposed project is consistent with the F4neral Plan. S. That the proposed project is in accordance with the objectives of the Development Code and the purpose of the district in which the site is located. C. That the proposed roj'ect together with the conditiocis applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public k8lth, safe%y, or welfare or materially injurious . to properties or. improvements in the vicinity. D. That the proposed project will compTyr with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. Conditions This project is approved subject to the following condition; I. A pedestrian accessway .shall be provided fron the south boundary of the project to Bear Gulch School to the 4outh. Thv! physical improvements (gate in the existing k fence, stecs, walks, etc.) necessary for the accessway, both o;, and off site, shall be completed with the Ckamtlas L Stout Lkborgh -V Browq L Chants! 9uquttli Jte$ty King Of N +qar.. Pamela I Wright Lwrtntt Wasserman 'Willi'am souey 4inor Development naaiew ",47 -6g March 13, 1988 Pape 2 construction of the proposed storage building prior to the issuance of building permits. However, if the developer is unable to 0tain the necessary access rights from the Property to tfie south after making a good faith effort to do so to �I 'satisfaction of the City Engineer, the City *111 a11N i his to enter into an agreement to defer the. physic imFprovewnts until such time th &4, the necessary acces`rights can be obtained by some other means. Please note that conditions may specify Completion of certain plans or work prior to issuance of building permits. If you should have any questions concernirsgg specific conditions, please fe[1 free to Contact Beverly Nissen ats; ;714)'989 -1861. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLAN IVISI f_....- G/ City P1 tier 96:tt cc: Jack Butler _II I I I I !. E BUTLER & ASSOCIATES March 21, 198e R Mr. Brad Buller r City Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Buller: I am the owner of Pepperwood Apartments and I recently received a copy of the attachEd letter. As you know, we have been corking with your department for six. months in order to get permission ao install a 600 square foot storage building, Your Teeter asks us to help you solve a Problem on the `adjacent' Property as a condition Of your approval, and requires us to spend considerable mor*dY on improvements relative to this problem. Gar storage building is not related to your need for an easement on soMone else's property. We are active members of the Rancho Cucamonga amity. We maintain one of the finest apartn;rmt complexes in the City, we are active in the Chamber and wle Pa :ticipate in charity functions, %bv are ye-i giving us a hard time1�hen we Cane to our City asking permission to build a 600 square foot store building? We told you months ago that we contacted the adjacent property owner and their said no to an easement. it is your job, not ours, but we tried. Please contact our ,nYsite manager, Ms. Jan Martynec, if you have a question regarding our attempt. I believe that we are being treated unfairly by the City Staff. By copy of this letter, I ask that v. be placed on the Planning COWission or City Council Agenda for a public review of our six month old request. Sincerely, �;ack "�� - L^ i L{/{�.. o� E. Butler JEB:dmk Enclosure cc: Honorable Dennis L. Stout Mayor, City of Rancho Cucamonga Mr. Lauren M 4l6sserren City Manager Mr. Jack Lan: Cormranity JJevelOr -Mnt Director / 7 t J. E. SUTLER & ASSOCIA,TES . AWL gEAL. 95TA E , E: E_C2'; E:.° . FINANCE May 25, 1988 99VppD Mr. Brad Buller My OF R ;iNc CS cuCi�le7 )Nwi nl ANNING DPASION City Planner / city of Rancho Cucamonga �irili 2 �JU� P.O. Box 807} g Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 �i(�j� {8srt j j l l jJi6 Dear Mr. Buller: l As you are awase, we have been struguling with oar attempt to obtain a building permit for a 600 square foot storage building at Pepperwood Apartm.ents.� We have discussed the matter and you were kind enough to give us a copy of your file relating to "Minor Development Review 87 -64 ". Our initial application was filed September C_`, 1987 and your response is contained in a letter to our 11 Architect dated March 11, 19BB. We wrote to you on March 21, 1988 objecting to the conditions of appsvval. Time ran out and you asked that we file a new application. Our new application is dated May, 2, 2gpS. On May 11, 1988 your Beverly Nissen advised us that we needed to write to you indicating that we _don't agree with your previous conditions. Please consider this letter aid our letter to you dated March 21, 1988 as our letter objecting to said conditions. Please advise us regarding the next step j in the process. E Sincerely, Sack E. Butler JEB:dmk Enclosure II !j cc: Mr. Jack tam EXHIBIT E C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AM STAFF REPORT DATE: July 1, 1988 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Associate Planner SUBJECT: VIRGINIA DARE CENTER PARKING STUDY I. ABSTRACT: This report briefly sumarizes the results of a parking study or the Yirgina Dare Center. The study was prepared in j response to a proposed multi -story office building south of the theater. II. BACKGROUND: A Condition of Approval for the theater stipulated that at e time any office structures were proposed which would ! require more: than 85 parking spaces adjacent to the theater, the applicant must submit a detailed panting_ analysis to determine if there is adequate parking for all then operating in proposed uses. The study was to be reviewed by the Planning Commission and if a conflict existed between the theater and other uses, then the Commission shall modification to reduce the square footage of the ,emaining. unbuiit office buildings in an amount coamensurated with the parking overlay, limit the hours of operation of the Cinema or other appropriate means of assuring adequate parking. The applicant is proposing to develop the parcel south of the theater. This office project consists of a thrwn- story building totaling 50'750 square feet and requires 203 parki,..a spaces. Staff has retained Austin -Foust Associates, Inc. to prepare an independent parking analysis. III. SUMMARY OF THE PARKING STUDY: 1. 'fie total number of parking spaces for existing and approved uses is 805 spaces. 2. The total number of parking spaces for existing and approved uses plus the proposed office expansion is 1,176 spaces. 3. The projected peak parking demand with matinee during weekdays Is 900 parking spaces and 728 spaces without matinees. 4. The total number of parking spaces provided on -site is 680 spaces. ITEM S S PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT RE: VIRGINIA DARE CENTER PARKING STUDY July 13, 1988 Page 2 The City Traffic Engineer has reviewed this parking analysis and =ecom ended that a 10% to 20% buffer, over the projected 900 space parking demand should be provided in order to have an adequate level Of se ^vices. A copy of Enginaering comments regarding the parking study is attached for your review. In summary, the proposed .office expansion would create a shortage of 320 spaces (900 minus 680 spaces) no` including tnt 10% to 20 buffed. Staff is still working with the consultant to refine tLe parking numbers based on changes to the retail and office squaro Faotage and an adjustment of the GTE office parking requirements. A more detailed report will be available for the Planning Commission to review at the July 27 1988 regular meeting. Both the applicant and the developer wkiT be availably tonight to . provide further information for the Comaission`s consideration. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recoamnds that the Planning CofiAission ccn nue s Director's Report to the July 27, 1988 meeting. regular 11y s tedr T ner BB:NF:ko Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Previously Approved Master Plan Exhibit "B" - Proposed Office Project South of Theater Traffic Engineer Memo on Virginia Dare Parking Study parking Study for Virginia Dare Center Done by Austin -Faust Associates El r� l �;1 •iC � y -� � . oaf _ £ y • I • VIN -mv .. tf� fig I toll fill, 1.1 41 :: - Nj. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Fort office Bo: 907, Rancho cueaaonsrr,, Calitomia 91730, (71 4) 989.1811 March ?s, 19es Joe Faust Austin -Faust Associatus 1450 Tustin Avenue #108 Santa Ana, California 92701 SUBJECT: A PARKING STUDY FOR A PROPOSED 3 -STORY OFFICElRETAIL BUILDING LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND HAVEN Dear Mr. Faust: Per our telephone conversation an March 25, 1988, the City desires to retain your office to do a parking study for the above described pr,)ject to be located in the Virginia Dare Center. Tile purpose of this parking study is to analyze the existing and proposed ases with regard to the number of parking spaces needed to support expected activity. Attached is a detailed scope of services nee6"J for this parking study. Enclosed for your use is a copy of the proposed detailed site plan for the last phase of the Virginia Dare Business Center with a summary development table for the different land uses, square footage, parking spaces required and being provided, etc. Staff also has intermittently monitored the parking situation of this project and hope that you could make use of the information gathered. A copy has Eisen enclosed for your use. Please submit a writN,,l proposal of the cost and time involved in preparing this study. Also please include a professional fee schedule and work agreement with you( proposal. For your information, our Business License Division has indicated that any City retained consultant must obtain a business license. Thank you for your cooperation and assistance in this matter. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at any time. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLAA1NIDI I N Nancy Fo Associate Planner NF:ko Attachment: Proposed Site Plan S ' Staff °� Dc�6il Q�� cc..rd�rme.n Hun' "ae1. Brawn Jelrrey King Dennis L. Stout Charles I. Buquet 11 Pamela J. Wright ca), ara' —s" Lauren M. Wasserman e I, _M SCORE OF SERVICES The services to be rendered by ti),.. consultant shall include the following. A. Provide ove —all parking demand forecast for a typical weekend including, school breax like summer time :it mid -day, early evening, and ,late evening both with and without theater matinee,. B. Provide detailed parking demand forecast for each potential use: Office Sit Down Restaurant Fast food Restaurant 77eater Retail C. Conduct parking survey of Virginia Dare Center on weekends dovir* mid - day, early evening and late evening. This should include a detcl nation as to whether Virginia Dare Center patrons are parking on adjoining Deer Creek. Village site or vice versa. D. Comparison to similar theater operations in mixed :use centers that are predominantly office /restaurant to develop accurate projections for parking demand to use in forecasts. E. If a parking study forecasts a parking shortage during critical peak times, then make recommendations for mitigation measures. E —`" CIT1' OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORh NLDTJM Date: June 13, 1988 To: Nancy Fong Frost: Chuck Mackey �G Subject: Virginia Dare Parking Study , The Virginia Dare Parking Study by A� ^stirs *Foust Associates has been reviewed. It is a solid traffic engineering study analyzing this centers parking patterns and determining future parking needs. The study uses shared parking methodology. The shared parking concept is valid. "Different land use activities are known to have different peak parking accumulation patterns. When such uses are combined in ,a mixed -use development, the total number of parking aces required is less than the summation of the spaces required when he same land use activities exist as stand -along developments. When such land uses are combined in a single development or are located adjacent to each other, variances in the individual :narking requirements should be allowed."* This study, by Austin- Foust, is straight forward, -complete and basically accurate. It concludes that shared parking is presently being utilized and that will also continue for the proposed use. It also concludes the amount of parking required by our city ordinance exceeds, by a considerable amount, the anticipated parking demand. These conclusions are correct. The study goes on to conclude that 900 parking spaces for the future City expansion ode andlthe study shows an anticipatedgpeata parking accumulation of 895 spaces (study shows 888, corrected to 895 due to restaurant rate adjustment ). However, the design parking space capacity should be, at leest, 10 to 20% over demand to provide some opportunity for vehicles to find an empty space when arriving at the parking peak. Therefore, in order to provide an adequate level of service, 9$5 to 1074 parking !spaces should be provided. The 1188 City code spaces provide for a 34% margin; of safety and provides an excellent level of service.. * page 188 - Stover, Keopke TTraart! rtation and land Develop2 nt, 1988, Institute of Transportation. Eng nom. -i ers. CM:pam S7 �� June S, 1988 City of Ranch Cucamonga P_0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ATTENTION. Ms. Nancy Fong SUBJECT: Virginia Dare Pxrklug Study Eh: +INEERING AND TRANSPORTATION PLANNING 1450 NORTH TUSTIN AVENUE, SUITE 106 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92709 TELEPHONE. (714) 667.0496 -� RECEtVEO — CtiY+Of ""CHO CUCAMOMGA PLANNIMG Dsv1�ICN .SUN 07 list Dear Ms. Fong- Austin-Foust Assa Oates, Inc. (AFA) conducted a study of Virginia Aare place in order to determine t(1e existing Pad future parking needs of that facility. The study included as analysis of the existing parking demand at Virginia Bare, the .ojected demand based on proposed land uses for the site, a detailed summary of parking demand for the various land uses, a comparison with similar mixed use centers, and a possible shared Parking, arrangement. Figure I indicates the project location, while Figure 2 illustrates the project site plan. Parking coq .ts were conducted at Virginia Dare Pla ^•e from 12:00 Noon to 9:00 PM on Friday May 13, Saturday May 14, "nd Saturday May 21. Parking cow.ts were also conducted from 11 ;00 AM to 3 :00 PIA on Sunday May 15. Table 1 presents a summary of the half 1-1 u riy counts including the average and maximums for each time period. Figure 3 illustrates J1e variation in parking accumulation by time and date, while Figure 4 illustrates the hourly variation in the average and maximum parking demands for the project site. When determining the amount of parking required for a mixed -use pcojsct, certair, information is helpful. The types of information most important fer determining g parkin demand are; size of the land uses, types of land use, hourly varatiot t in parking demand (for the land use types in question), and seasonai variations in parkin.g demand (for the types of land use in question). The project currently cor..ins office, retail, sit -down restaurant, fast food and cinema uses. Proposed plans call for increasing the amount of office, retail and sit- down restaurant space. Table 2 presents a summary of the existing and proposed land uses as well as the amours' of required parking for each use, based on the City of Ranjito Cucamonga parking ordinance. The following analysis examines the impact of these additions as well as the estimated shared parking savings for the project. To assess the parking experience of other si,...'lar mixed -use projects Urban Land Institute (Shared Parking, 1983) and American Planning Association (Flexible Parking Requirements, 7% Smith, 1983) data was used. These studies have determined tht ^eak parking hours and ;requirements for various land uses. Table 3 presents a summary of ;sexing detrand levels by time of day, for several ztj uses. As this table indicates, different land uses have peak parking demands at different times of the day or week. Table 4 presents a similar analysis for the land uses which are part of the subject project. These tab es allow for rt J 9 11 11 estimating the number of parking spaces needed at different times of the day for weekdays and Saturday. (Figures 5 and 6 geaphicaily illustrate the variations in parking demand by type of ]and use, for weekdays and Saturdays, The above information provides the basis fos assessing the impact, on parking demand, o: combinations of land uses. It is apparent, by examining 1 figures 5 and 6, that certain uses can be combined so that a savings in parking can be obtained. Using the City of Rancho Cucamonga parking ordinance and Table 4, the estimatt.' number of parking spaces required for the Project can be calculated for each tour of a weekday or Saturday. Table 5 presents such an analysis for a weekday, with and without a cinema matinee. As this table indicates, the ta:al number of parking spaces required would ;;z 888 at 2:00 PM with matinees and 728 spaces at 8:00 PM without matinees. Table 6 presents the same calculations for a ;aturday, where the peak demand would be 6> ^x% at 8 :00 PM, Besides hourly variations in parking demand there are also seasonal effects on certain Land uses. Table 7 presents the moL�hm vs.HVjrP. ist parking demand for a number of land uses. This information is important when interpreting the results of case studies, such as the one performed for Virginia Dare Place. -I\s the study of Virginia Dare Place was cogducted in May, some of the land uses were not experiencing there full demand, regarcaess of thI day of week or time of day of the study. To convert the existing demand level to the maximum seasonal demand, a target month must be chosen. For the land uses of Virginia Bare Place, the months of June or July ate optimum, as only retail is below 100% of maximum demand. Taking the hourly peal., (5:00 PM Saturday) found in cable 1, the seasonal t of the f rking demand fcr each type of use can be eliminated. Table 8 uses the montc_ of June as the target -unth. By converting the existing parking demand, for each use, to its optimum demand level in June, an overall maximum parking demand level can be calculated. As shown in this table, the total demand of 276 spaces, calculated in the field study of the project, can be converted to a total of 943 spaces for the higher demand month of June. When this demand level is comp red to the number of required spaces (contained in Table 2) the actual demand is only 42.6% -�f the required amount (343 /805). This would seem to indicate that there is a consideraY -nouns of shared parking savings at the project site, and /or that certain (2nd uses are ; etir ing ;heir - nti :ipated parking demand levels. This parking study calculated the existing parking demand, the ordinance requirements, and the shared parking effects of a mixed -use project in Rancho Cucamonga. The number of parking spaces required for exir ing uses is 805, while the peak parking demand calculated by ite indicates a need for only 276 spaces, 343 spaces when a field study of the project s seasonal effects are eliminated. Proposed changes in the project site, would result in s parking ordinance requirement of 1,176 sr .es. A parking demand analysi3, based on hourly variations in parking demand, . indicates a need for 728 sb;a es (if there are no movie matinees) or 888 parking spaces with movie matinees. Based on the field study, of the existing project land uses, it is evident that shared parking arrangemev:a are being utilized and that the amount of parking required by the ordinance exceeds the anticipated demand. Given the above results, it is conch, 1 that th/ proposed project will not require more parking than that provided for in the City of o rd The proposed opcsptit.i for a hareuparking arrant ment.Us Using the results Project eldstud Y of the project sit e and available parking demand data, it is estimated that 400 parking s^aces for the proposed project would be sufficient. If you have any questions regarding this study, iCz methodology, or the findings, please call. Respectfully submAted, Joe E. Fou-- 11:F /kh • j i 1 1 CM QF RANCHO fiE m PLANNINn DIVIS10.4 JUN 0 7 ISM Ali 33Wad0 G Yfl dOf'LIY� i s; n = •r,', : f. I 'Y S. I c `9 7NY.11+ ~ °I 1LUU w 13 7t i at 4N + — W AY l y ( H d 1 00,14 I L4 t — + ( Ay rn 'II!(�� m �r •��oi�ri `r3 A o` AY Fog CI i3 �111--ELAYV UA . � ..: �„•,p . i''�. � �� =jai � �„'"�'�' � �.� �� 711106 ry- ;� jay � •. ,,� + E � ' G G C TI .r sr u ( M t = aib.ri3 .gyp O AYE � w : , .�• le ei me n -F Y6 Maw! 'tea w Alf r awas.n° �Y r ' a i =Y�acc o� YF er — $ L ' ►.i ax[ is o �117 .. to —4 ti ! _ C7 JRF it ,., � c4i, ;,s,•. � I { •< IA, 1 Iflltr ' '�G �'• .111 tlf '� � � •e -�.eea I I 1 If' 1 / .711"1.1 7lutlllllfnt � �� '' r �, - -. - -- Table T NUMBER OF PARKED VLaIXCDES BY DATE'iW COUNT TIME ____Fri =5 -13 -- Sat -5_14= _ Sun _5 -15 '3at 5 -21 Maximum Average 11:00 149 ----------------- - -- - -- 149 - -- -- =- 149 N061v 180 x9b` 173 468 249 173 249 173, 198 1:00 186 190 206 220 170 266 234 234 199 2.00 400 186 250 240 260 266 2601 229 224 223 187 182 196 153 185 223 186 3:00 130 230 158 163 154 140 198: 230 174 178 4:00 181 176 235 175 230 235 215 5 :rr 155 186 178 239 260 239. 2o0 197 201 -160 276 250. 263 241 278 250 235 217 6 :00 156 165 I30 180 104 7 :00 130 120 160 163 185 1.85 158 97 166 132 141 163 166 135 8 :00 93 112 138 138 114 9:00 90 86 98 97 142 12 11.0 148 lac8 110 AVERAGE G 156 183 183 198 208 176 MAXIMUM 1 I, f f ` I�I f' 223 276 265 283 278 235 I � I I 'i \�- now N a o u n � C w t z -.E H o P t's9 p o a c o 0 H I P ` In A o + � i Y 0 � 0oaog0 ®$o000oc�ooa i0o 0 to to P N N N N N N N N W 0 'few n N .n- t:J 0 M T PT r P a. P 1 en u 03k2sHed S3131HRA 40 H3erm CI a � �O U $4 u E Er m of o n ao 0 t� o ic9 b a o a 4 rA iv r P N 4nV N N N� N P O W E4i G3N;dvd szmoIH3A do Z 3annH �O U $4 u E Er m Tab3;e 2 ORDINANCE PARKING REQUIR&MENTS AL LAND USE - EXISTING SIZE _M - -- `s5.8 +T5F �r�,,' '. �x ,5$A SIZE �- �1a3.0 -TSF PARKING' REQUIRED (EXISTING) (E�ils�'�NG PARKING REQUIRED (PROPOSED) - ---CFA , .,.__ _ 142 412 RETAIL RESTAURANT 2,5 113.5 TSF TSF 13.0 TSF 19.4 TSB` 10 135 52 1,94. EAST FOND 1.9 TSF 28 T13F 25 25 CINEMA 1723 SEATS 1723 SEATS - 436 436 GTE OFFICE M3 TSF 14.3 TST' 57 57 TOTAL $OS 1173 ;�� n °38888S88S8�SS�, S^ G S S# S O C S N i ' ♦ �� N� N N N. MI M Y V mot' v V P P S S P O M1 oWo S F� •� ub pp p pp pp pspQ ��rr pp N N N' 1V N M If01 A� h Y01 I� D. O O O P T M • N • � {/� y � p. (�O yp (y �yi p � O .w0 ,��1 v -: � MI IM Mi F/ V' `O..h�. A P P P � tF O a7 440 tl O O P P P R P P S S i � t �. �• N' Abp yN�q ^ P q M y♦ ♦p 4. A h A F Ib ^� �S A O AMK M K 6 0 E K W M, W pp O O Op o po ♦ N M w M M 'N r t♦1 � �'1 v�� P O �.:0 .� � p YNf V' M M f ` OK • a Q N .O O P N pp A r to P YET M1 R i0..A W M • C pp e ee pp W. AML t ar a a m a q 1e CL 0. CL c�A I I 'O A O iA f'• w a' i. ft -.ry N t 1 Table 4 WEEKDAY PARKING REMAND (PER'TSF 09 10 SEATS) BY LAND USE - TIME OFFICE _-- ^RETAIL_ RSSTRNT PAST FOOD CINEMA 8yd0 0.12 0.80 0`00 - _- _0100 -- p_OD___ __ -� 8:.00 2.52 0.32 0.72 0.20 0.50 0.27 0.00 10:00 3.72 4.00 1.68 1.00 0.67 1.33 0.01: 0.00 NOON 3.60 3.48 11.00 3, t'0 2,66 3.99 0.0 0.00 3.60 3.88 4.00 5.00 7.00 6.65 9.31 0.80 2:D0 3.88 3.86 6.00 7.98 1.75. 1.75 4:DO 3.78 3.80 3.48 6.00 5.00 7.98 1.75 6:00 1.88 0.92 3.16 7.00 6.65 9.31 1.75 1.75 0.28 3.28 3.56 9.00 10.00 11.97 13.30 2.00 2.25 6:00 0.28 0.12 3.48 10.00 13.30 2.50 10:00 0.12 2.44 1.28 10.00 9.00 13.30 2.50 11.97 2.50 SATURDAY PARKING DENAND (PER TSV OR 10 SEATS) BY LAND USE --------------------------------------------------------------- TIMEOFFICE R RETAIL R RESTiENT F FAST FOOD C CINEMA 6 6 :00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 5 � 0 Z Q d k t3 v Z C Q IL w X 0 4d. g M �i a lal a3aino3w VSOV4S JO IeMN a tn. to a � Nz w N� W p` s •F lal a3aino3w VSOV4S JO IeMN a tn. to a � Nz w N� W p` 0 Z M LLI 0 z VI O Y o a IA. 12 d � C) a. tl2 s x r O O L9 tu. q O c c E x O ea T'3 Y IR S,-,p 0 2 WI 0 L N. �a t0 N � D to F H 9 kt Table 5 WEEKDAY PARKING DEUAND (PER TSF OR 10 SEAT -- BY LARD ULZ TIME ---------------------------------- OFFICE' RETAIL RESTRNT .----- _- FAST FOOD CINE'AA SUM 6:00 12 0 _-- 0 - - - - -- - --- ---- 0 - -- - - -- ----- 8.00 _� -_ 12 10:00 82 260 4 9 4 1 0 81 10:00 383 412 22 35 18 39 3 0 280 427 NOON 412 371 45 50 58 97 5 8 0 0 491 523 2:00 371 52 136 13 is 128' 30.1. 660 877 2:00 400 50 116 15 301 883 4:C0 383 317 49 45 116 97 15 301 865 6:00 194 41 136 13 18 301 301 773 689 6 :00 95 43 175_ 23 344 679 8:00 29 29 48 45 194 194 25 25 387 430 681 10:00 12 12 32 17 194 175 25 23 430 72Z 693 430 656 MAXIMUM 412 52 134 25 430 883 TIME ------ OFFICE RETAIL RESTRNT FAST FOOD CINEMA* SUM AXIMUM 412 52 194 25 430 723 *Add spaces to total for emploYom- 12 0 t 0 -- --------- 0 �- -- 12 12 8:00 82 260 4 9 30 1 10:00 383 412 22 35 19 39 3 0 0 280 427 412 45 5 0 0 491 NOON 371 50 97 13 523 2:00 371 400 52 50 i36 116 18 15 0 576 4 :00 38,3 317 49 45 116 15 0 0 582 564 j 194 41 97 136 13 18 0 3D1 472 839 6:00 95 43 175 23 344 679 8 :00 29 29 46 45 194 194 25 25 387 430 681 10:QO 12 32 17 114 25 430 723 653 - 175 23 490 656 AXIMUM 412 52 194 25 430 723 *Add spaces to total for emploYom- *Add 5 spaces to total for employees Table s SATURDAY PARFING DEMAND (PER TSF OR 10 SEATS) BY LAND USE TIME -6:00 ----------------------------------------------- OFF'ICF; RETAIL RESTRNT FAST GOOD CINEMA * sum 7:00 ifi 2 , -- -------------- - - 8xQa 43 5 4 6 1 0 2� 9:00 64 16 12 2 p 0 93 lo:aa 80 23 is 2 0 11:00 3 105 NOON 1:00 80.4," gg 8 0 1n9 140 3ls 2:00 64 48 52 87 11 3t31 513 3:00 32 52 87 11 11 301 301 500 4:00 5:00 32 116 47 41 301 48 4778 6:00 1'6 39 34 116 175 3 34 4 488 7:00 8 :00 16 16 31 18+ 24 24 344 387 541 642 .3:00 p 29 21 194 194 Z ia 25 430 fis4 1D;00 -0 20 184 24 430 430 670 658 MAXIMUM 80 52 194 25 430 694 *Add 5 spaces to total for employees i r+ V Ki KT b p11 N1 je g�R tK - - - - - - - — — i i N h $ I Op b p(y Cpsppyy��pp,p M W L. L L Table B PEAK PARKING,)EMAND CON'PROL. En'FOR SEASONAL EFFECZlS EXISTING MAY A JUNE % ESTIMATED LAND USF PARKING USED PARKING PARKING, USED CONVERSIC*, PARKING ----------------------- USED ----------------------------- FACTOR REQUIRED," l OFFICE 4 100% 100 % 1.00 -� - - - -- - --- -- -19 RETAIL 3 70% 75% 1.07 3 iI \J RESTAURANT 46 95% 100% 1.06 49 FAST FOOD. g 95% 100% 1.06 g CINEMA 150' 70% 100% 1.43 214 GTE OFFICE 20 100% 100% 1.00 20 TOTAL 276 343 r CITE' OF RANCm CUGALiGxcu STAFF REPORT DATE: July 13, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Comissfon PROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Debra Meier, Associate Planner f SUBJECT: DETERMINATION OF TI V!STA TOWN cENTER AS -A "REWON SIGN PROGRAM ir► r I. ABSTRACT: Staff is requesting that the Planiting Commission, review e£h definition of a Regional Commercial Center as specified in the General Plan and determine that the Terra- -Yi ;ta Town Center project is a Regional Center. The purpnse of the determinatir;; is to allow ereparation of a Uniform Sign Program for the project using the Regional Shopping Center" criteria of the Sign Ordinance. II. 0174USSION: Within the General Plan are descriptions of e g or ood Commercial, Community Commercial and Regional Comm.arcial Centers. To summarize, the following criteria is includad within those definitions. �Neighborhood Commercial: These centers shall be provided to sect ll and seNTc -e needs of a cluster of neighborhoods. The primary use within the neighborhood shopping carter should be a majv supermarket and total leaseable area ranginn from 30,000 to 1004,000 square feet, on 5 -15 acre sites. COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL:- ) amount of gross leasable area within. communi s opp ng. centers range from 100,000 to 300,000 square feet. The centers shall not exceed 80 acres in size, and may include the same range of retail-and service uses found in the regional center, although the composition of uses in the commercial center should be less devoted to shopper's goods. REGIONAL CC MRCIAL,. The regional center shall provide the full range o re an service uses with the primary use being a major shopping center accomadating several major department stores. The site should be a minimum of 50 acres. ITF` 7 PLANNING COMPtISSION STAFF REPORT TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER July 13, 1588 Page 2 �t The Terra Vista Torn Center is situated on a 7X acre site and includes 787,000 square feet of leasable area. The project will include four major , Unants as well as a theater along with many mill shops and retjalrrants. The composition of tenants Will be devoted to goads, rather than services, IIi SUK -VMYt The determinations that this project is a Regional �Fp%g Center will allow the applicant to prepare a sign program with greater flexibility than would be perm tte;d as a neigd borhood shopping renter. The sign program, criteria esiiablished--wrihin tha Sign Ordinance was developed with parameters of Neighborhood Comercial Centers in mind, ns they make up the majority of s i s l tde fOcomr l use t r of gn Permitted r within the es as outlined n the type Ordinance are specifically suited to the steeds of those centers less than 50 acres in size. The ordinance also recognizes that the needs of a Regional tenter is bevoild � scope established for Smaller centers, due to site exposure, scale of the,Aroject and the number of major tenants involved in such project:;, A si,lnage program for a Regional Center shalt be submitted to the City Mawr in accordance with the sign permit proces s;. with approval of the sign permit by the planning Commission; RECOt+ MATIONS: Staff recommends that the CoMission determine rra s x Town Center project to be a "Regional Shopping Center'.. R e full i ad lul . Ci nner 138:Oldtmlg L-Al. ti `t POW Permitted Sins — Commercial and Office Uses, The foBowing signs may be permitted for commercial and offiCipt uses subject to the provisions listed: CLASS staff TYPE MAXIMUM NU}ISEgM�. SIAMNIUSt 3iONAREA MAXIMUU - HEIGHT HP-MAIMS I• sustness IdenUticatton fauimev Walt . t6 % of the Wildirp �' face not to ""to on* pr tuUdLq' {aq,5 awalmue of Nat to IaV*t above tie toot and 4t no a. A combinatlon of monument end. waU sigio may be vied. fawever, oatwitllM acpping ceahn three(3)Pay business. fSo squMetent case be hkba than cniv e maxim 4m of I !i(fi'�i may et uua C1 mdWdinlg". ld SU test from 7aILWgreda kenUtg ury ode dutey tcasnt office buildings) one mcnomect I, Was akae doff monument sl -"64U be WOA%ctually twpned to,rccamn�tata On* per sreet 14squatermt Up to If feet lrnnte6e, a max ?mum of twdtd wf;n the development. gr twsttusr. 1; a. Mo -Mol. s'.gae s1iUi be placed entt gy _ tat the oak ^t property and stcl nt :. susinea Identl6ratlen HaH One per bui18UC, teed, a nehtnwm of to %nf ilia OUitding hce, not to astmtel Hot is ptejset Kvea tM rot sW In no >v A ammnautn of etomtmeet end Oil w'`a! tNy be Weir noweter, ithh% stepping Conrad I for. soy ono I;Gagwrefe cafe ba Al w th" atp t ataaln`wq of I ska Mir be uw to - nbibd grates. WrSt4y my tart looms. 4 Wall algae A14 limited to tenftw 1denU6atiat" ,; 4 Menttmew- TVs loarmotato to to tleee f - name of 04 cPan� k'r e,ait— tanant. aitmt of fib ca. it tell .two tbWlta. or �7fb ,.. ll a tr>taatr, Badge (eau easte" tKAO J 'r, #J4 mouabentx riEa ebettdga i, �C1Wo 01"aar. loo w stretta teed not amid —11M .IX IdMHrat Wlormatlae. AddWanaliy, a tw aided Akft need UK amdalA VW a" t naYl. d. A centao Is ono in rdlicb bnol des end strwluaa are dntpned in an intepr'ted VA W111016tad Oevaiopment. uce daiin le tMepeount Or trw mmi er Of st=tum' lots. a Patois mesing u} the ae3 cent.+. OM per street trontsilf, not to 74querefaet Uptd! Met . mormment a. All ahaWq matem *Ali develop. A "to" two par coo Mb atd sign ptagmm for all tonne dad OWL 'lave Inolada tlze, mlce, atgA development typo, and location. United weatlon Is var'nitted, seed as ±%lee, as fats as the conapooaMa of [M p 'v"m end 'ta e= �khbd. � 3Salvtea tsar Ult to AS,� Wrectary L 'tUO alfn2orydgaa an fntaeded ta. t+reiddatlan too city ylaeetar. Skis me be en3 ketl¢Ratien is efb > il�el.laal ela!P taoatti. Alt . Bm s M[llti lrWtn a mtltlm4a gp leer aotbadc tram w xreet Sea : a• gK ataet " faaas weR letta:tta tact Of ",bN- ti `t Prctram. hllgi t. a rindOK a dttl9ng apenlaj Mal brsemleas. Sign shell (rat eieeed _ 6 feet In height. S. Perlmd"TrOfit WaU,. rind.., On_perbuAlmeaa Permitted Signs— Commercial and Office Uses (Continuc6). Suelt fgn AMU contain mtp the i Artincetim of S[Sts .are" feet above rtaished the WO.M(orpt'les tratna. Nor 6. Z.N"My6(g,4 CLASS SIGN NAXIMUM MAXIMUM "A U4 R&tOARRS type NUMBER SIGN AllEA Re1GriT d. Busineee WAU TO Ise aktenalned by tin Coq ducat 10% of the face of the Not toproleetabore u A soaeeptual alto pmeam for ft- :r- •em,urcert.w.,v....r.s.o (multiple - w,._ Oased an cads itrucuae, rbaa sign b to Wptnad, =t the Mr. ta➢db'yanU lx segvweed at ttx tisntM drlptMetf. Professional tedants lndbldwlbeUdrit -„ nor to eteee0 ". !9 more I'll" Wee). The bombtr and and Cdtn. squert lest. b. The Cttq P'.tthutmsxt nvtar. 412.*Mm piaoeeeni of all vl monument - oreppAratteet 2l sguart rut Up to t fret � sign , Ptog a= Urougt the permit Ptoadun to detarmint that. It b.Itbk, end direeto7 sign sletle subject to aced mWmao oft' L. eritals herein sat forth and aeeti.. eerierby the Gty Directory TobetiMlumGedby 15 sgtare Jest Tbbeuetwcy-Sar: sbawentelthle Orduance. pumter, the City Pbs" Vie. - ,unient 519M sMU be Umited to basedty ea co tl—, the (same o1 the profwslrat bading rtpies. d. 111mcloty signs may be pieeed Lhw ;hat tM site a needed and shall ' Da Umlted. ro L`stIng the tenants tame end tiulte camber_ A, Strata station" identlflettim and Wall aao Par 'West fromtage, w."taw In of botdbt(ne not , b eavead ISO mot above mf Cas r SM a. A eeatNtetion of P.Gue at. rid call waytw coed, but ro. won Uses a total of PtI.Ing end 3 tow I feat r ,ice, manumeat One per street 16 square te:t. Up to t teat b, The tnonussot sttn f.'ell, to deetgred to e :cab a i x alt tht tden!iBUUoa'.( tbt ration aft t torsi a" peoiloa Priem Nt other price sign two par ate allowed. 1 0. Spesiat Seerire WsU of trotaid Ono for each Wrap 2square feet it counted on wall Spacial service, signs &tell be Umited to ash ! ! Signs island, not to "need or pole of the items as "if serve, full sent', air, rater, a total of four Par eunopf, it stall be etsetw std s•lal be ranil!umtaated. stetiaa to nthaf. -'^met t less. t'i, "s',Am fast nt• .--ed it last In e. Special. Advattaement Winger [round T.o Par?tad" 6square feet A [rood sign s'%U i eaeetk 6 ( t 1 Speeiat adeertiaament shalt be. U.1ted to ^v Prctram. hllgi t. a rindOK a dttl9ng apenlaj Mal brsemleas. Sign shell (rat eieeed _ 6 feet In height. S. Perlmd"TrOfit WaU,. rind.., On_perbuAlmeaa ifgsste feet Nat to awed 12 Suelt fgn AMU contain mtp the i Artincetim of S[Sts .are" feet above rtaished the WO.M(orpt'les tratna. grade. 6. Z.N"My6(g,4 taul -.w %1% of lha whtggw Serb Of the .Smtlow Nbttotccted3kat Such wins sbaU be Umlted to teoryonry ate a 9" suer - led. Ntl bustaew - eel s 1. Rttlo;ul Stropping Uttandetekos�:[( A' setiawtrmtioimream :r- •em,urcert.w.,v....r.s.o e..rww,.x..a - w,._ Prctram. E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, MEMORANDUM DATE: duly 13, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the punning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner SUBJECT: REVIEW TRAILS ADVISORY COMITTEF, APPOIMEtITS I. BACKCRO<JND: On February 24, 1988, the Planning Commission adopted new admint stratve regulations for the Trails Advisory Committee. The membership of the Committee was restructured to include Um Planning Commissioners, two parks and Recreation Commissioners, and one Member -at- Large. The Parks and Recreation Conmission will be considering their appointments on ,July 21. The Committee is currently composed of the following members :. Suxanne Chitiea. Planning i.: emission Peter Tolstoy, Planning Commission Brace finerick, PlanntnV Commission Alternate Pamela Henry. Member -at -Large (Also Parks and Recreation Commission) Christine Benoit, Member -at -large II. RECGWENDA71ON: The Planning Commission should review and appoint No' ffiWers iplus an alternate) and one member-at- i'droe. One Commissioner should be appointed for 24 months and on_ Commissioner for 12 months to stagger the terms to maintain centinuity. Resp ally s fitted Bra r City PI ner 88:oe:te ITEN U CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG11 MEMORANDUM r DATE• TO. .PROM: BY: SUBJECT:. rl6m my 13,196$ Chai'rVA and Members of "he Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Dan Coleman, Senior Planner DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS (Starting first meeting rIn August) The Planning Commission policy is that Me Sership be rotated every six months. The current appointments are as fol'.ajs: COMMERCIAVINDUSTRIAL RESIDENTIAL Larry McNiel Suzanne China Peter Toistoy Bruce ETerick Alternate: David Blakesley R48ul y su ted, BrCir BB:DC:te HER V