Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1988/09/14 - Agenda Packet
0701-02 PC Agenda a 1, of 5 i� I CITY OF RANT -HO CL A,-vjCPsCA -PLANNI LNG 'CONITNIISSIO :AGENEl , Residential District (844 dwiLi,li units per acre), located at 9,974 19th Street - APN: 202- 171 -31, 32, and 35. Associated with this application is Tree Removal Permit 88 -37. k WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 14,1988 7:00 p.m. L1014S PARK COMMUNITY CENTER k 9161 BASE LINE I 4 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA L Pledge of Allegiance IL Roil Gall Commissioner Blakesley Commissioner Emerick _ _ Commissioner Chitiea _ Commissioner McNiel Commissioner Tolstoy I11. Announcements IV. Approval of Wmutes July 27, 1988 4 August 24, 1988 V.- Consent Calendar The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non- controversial. They will be acted on by the Commission at one UM6 Without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. A. DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13441 -- GRUPE DEVELOPMENT -- Design review of building elet.Aionss and detailed site plan for a previously approved tract map consisting of 115 single family lots on 18.06 acres of land in the Low- Medium Density Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) within the Victoria Planned Community, located at the northeast corner of Victoria .Park Lane and Kenyon Way - APN; 227- 011 -07. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMEN'. REVIEW " 88-19 - BRETHREN IN CHRIST"-CHURCH - Design review of building elevations and plot_ plan 7 for an ;]:1,679 square foot administration and worship centair 'within a previously approved Master Planned church facility on - 6.8'aeres of land in the Medium Residential District (844 dwiLi,li units per acre), located at 9,974 19th Street - APN: 202- 171 -31, 32, and 35. Associated with this application is Tree Removal Permit 88 -37. k i C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 27 BARTON DEVELf,�MENT - The development of ? industrial buildu,gs totaling'69,968 square feet on 3.57 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8) of the Indotrial Area Specific Plan, located south of Arrow Highway s,, the interseeeion of Red Oak Street and Edison Court - APN: 209.4x42- - 34, VL Public Hearings The following items. aFe public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice 'their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating -,our name and address. All such opinions shall be Iimited to 5 rainutes per individual for each project. D, 3NVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL- USE PERMIT 8801 - 1tTALBANDIAN /CTIiAO w the development of a mixed use project consi ing of a 46 unit condominium projct on 5,81 acres of long and a 39,OQ0 squara foot commercial cenier for a market /drug store, bank, and retail use on 3,56 acres of lend in the Community Service District of fire Etiwand'a Specific Plan, located at the no, tiiwest corner of Base Line Road and Wanda Avenue - APN: 227- 522 -01, 02, 03, 04 and 227- 521 -65. Associated with this {project is Tree Removal Permit 88 -11, requ .,sting the removal of two (2) mature trees along Etiwanda Avenue. (Continued from ;august 24, 1988) E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13886 - NAL CHIAO - The development of a 46 unit. condominium pm,jest on 5.81 acres of land in the Community Service District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the northwest cor.rer of Base .amine Road and Etiwanda Avenue APN: 22.1-522-01, 02, 03, 04, and 227- 521 -65. (Continued from August 24, 1988). F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 11394 - 1J711 1,, - A subdivision of 9.37 acres of land into 2 parcels in the Community Service District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the northwest corner of Base Line Road and EtiWanda Avenue APN: 227- 522 -01, 02, 03, ,G4 and 227 - 521 -•65. G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND 'VARIANCE 88 -09 - WHEELE& AND WAFFLER ARCHITECTS - A'request to reduce the required .parking setback along Foothill Boulevard from 50 feet to 40 feet and along the rear property line from 15 feet to 5 feet for a retail center. -and service station in the Community Commercial District (r„ibarea 2) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located iii the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avet,-;e- APN: 209- 192 -06. H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT A8 -03 - WHEELER AND WHEELER ARCI3ITEC�Ta • 'l'he deveiopment of a retail- enter and service station totaling 416 square feet on 0.63 acres of land in the Community Commercial District (Subarea 2) of the Foothill boulevard Specific Plan,. located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue - APN: 2.06,492 -06. L ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE 4 PERMIT 88 28 - PERRY - Me development of a 5,915 square foot {I[ retail building on 0.52 acres of land within an existing shopping ce;Iter in the Community Commercial District of fihe Foothilll Specific PIan, located on the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Malachite Avenue - APN: 208 - 261 -20. J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88 -34 - MO>7TESSORI CIiILD ENRICHAY CENTER OF RhNCHU CUCAMONGA - The request to establish a pre - school in an existing building in the Community Commercial District (Subarea 3) of the Foothill Boulevard Specifie Plan, located at 9544 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 20-151-14, 15 and 16. K. MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONS ,, ; APPROVAL FOR PARCEL MAP 9897 - WESTERII p.HopERTiES - A request to modify the Conditions, of Approval requiring a median island within, 'terra Vista Parkway for a subdivision of 17.08 acres of land into 3 parcels in the Terra Vista Planner? Community, located on the . southeast corner of Church SLrect and Terra Vista Parkway - APN: 1077- 421 -- 16,1077- 091 -17. L. EXV,IRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13738 RODINE COMPANIES. INC - A residential subdivision of 18 single family lots on 12.88 acres of land in tie Very Low Residential District (1 -2 . dwelling ugyts per acre), 'acated west of Sapphire, south of Almond - APN: ,061 - 091 -03. Araociated with the project is Tree Removal Permit 88 -16. M. VACATION OF SAN DIEGO AVENUE - From Foothill Boulevard to north of San Bernardino Road - ParCel Map 10238. N. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 11671 - MISSION LAND COMPANY - A subdivision of 97.96 acres of land into 35 parcels in the General Industrial A:ea (Subarea 11) and the industrial Park Area (Subarea 12) of the Industrial Specific Plan, located, between 4th and 6th Streets and between Pittsburgh and Buffalo Avenues - APN: 229- 263 -23 through 27. t .J -t, 'i 1 Q O. VARIANCE RIANCE ;88 8 - LEWIS HOMES - A request to reduce the required 20 foo ,s'dtback at the site boundary to a minimum of 12 feet and a regi ;s1. to reduce the required amount of comY;ion open space from 35 peteent to 13.2 percent for a multi - family p 'ojeet locs'.zd on 4.6 acres of land in the Medium Density Residential District (8 -14 dwelling unitr per acre), located at the northwest corner of Arrow 'Flighway and Vineyard Avenue - APN: 207-14 - 41 through 37, . VARIANCE 88••17 - 20,20 RECYCLE CENTERS - A request to eliminate th e rre.jt iced 3 foot landscape planter along the sides and rear, to eliminate the overhead trellis or, arbor, and to reduce the setback nKultpment from 50 feet to 20 feet for a recycling fai;ility located at 9743 Ease Line Road in the Neighborhood : Commercial District- APNZ 077- 011-43 and 49, Q. VARLANCa 88-13 - 20/20 RECYCLE CENTERS - A request to eliminate jhe required 3 foot landscape Planter aloe the sides and rear, and eliminate the overhead trellis or ar' or for a recycling facility located at 9477 roothill, Boulevard in the Community Commercial Dl- ?trlet of the Poothiil Boulevai d Specific 'PIan APN: 208461-3 and 38. R. VARIANCE 83-14 - 20/20 RECYCLE CENTS' IS, -, A regcest 40 eliminate the required 3 foot landsape planter along the sides and rear, and to eliminate the overhead trellis or arbor for a recycling facility, locr.ied at 9750 Nineteentii Str: -et in ..y-' Neighborhood; Commercial District - APN: 202 - 171 -56. VII. New Business S. MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -71= - COMMERCIAL CARRIERS, INC - An appeal of sn� 'Conditions of Approval for the grading and paving of appeeximately 12 acres of land for an existing site within the Minimum lnpact /Heavy Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 9), located ore the south side of Jersey Boulevard between Utica and Vincent Avenue- APN: 209-101-71 8 and 9. T. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND 'DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -24 - DiCKER- WARAIINGTON -The design review of elevations and detailed site plan fora proposed retail satellite building totaling 5f17 square feet within a 15.3 :acre approved shopping center, in a0 ,Aghborhood Commercial District of the Terra Vista Planned Community, located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Haven Avenue - APN- 202- 801 =35`. ,j U. ENVI&ONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 8820 - GII;BEI2T AJA AND ASSOCIATES - The review of a Master Plan for a 104 acre industrial park within the -General Industrial and Industrial Park Districts (Subareas 11 and 12) and Phase I�consisting of two light industrial buildings totaling 64,200 square feet on 3.8 acres of land in the General industrial District (Subarpr "11) of the Industrial Specific Plan, located south of 6th Strcr.,„ east of Pittsburgh Avenue, south of 4th Street, and west of pr'xblo Avenue - APN: 129 263- 22 -27. V. ' DESIGN' REVIEW FOR TENTATIVA TRACT 11731 - LEWIS HOMES - Des- Design review of building elevations and plot plana for Phases 3, 4, and 5 of a provievuly reeordLe Tract Map consisting of 61 condominium units oa 4.6 acres of land in the Medium Density' Residential District (8 -14 dweniag units per acre), located at the northwest corner of Vineyard Avenuo and Arrow Route APN; 207- 193-4I. through 11: Related File: Variance 88 -08. VEEL Director's Reports W. YMCA PARKING - A determination aI --'use for parking calculation. Ig- Cotnmisslon B sines X. TRAIL ADVISORY COMMITTEE - Appointment (Oral Report) Y. NORTH FTIWANDA WORKSHOP - Discussion of workshop date on development within the sphere -of- influence north of Etiwanda. (Oral Report) X. Public Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which da not already appear on this agenda. XL Adjournment , The Planning C=ommission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. f ie !—s ! IoMl�laGc 4�l01l64s ttIN " ai CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON So 1"w- r__ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA . STAFF REPORT DATE: September 14, 1988 1 y TO: Chairman and' Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Brett Horner, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TRACT 13441 DESIGN REVIEW GRUPE DEVELOPMENT - Design review q ui ng a eva offs an e a e s e plan for a previously appro4ed tract map consisting of 115 single family lots on 18.06 acres of land in the L-�A- Medium Density Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) within the Victoria Planned Community located at the northeast corner of Victoria Park Lane and Kenyon Way - APN: 227 - 011 -07. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of building elevations and plot plans. B. Project Density: 6.37 dwelling units per acre. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning.- or - acan ow ,� ensity residential (4.8 dwelling units per acre) South - Vacant; Proposed Elementary Scholl site East - Vacant; Proposed High School site West - Vacant; Low- Medium " -ansity Residential.(4 -8 dwelling units per acre) D. General 'Plan Designations: ro ec i e - oW_-36 um� ensity Residential North - Low - Medium Density Residential South - Low- Nedium Density Residential East - Proposed Junior High School West - Low- M -adium Density Residential II. ANALYSIS: A. Sack round: Tentative Tract 13441 was reviewed by the Planning omm ss on on June 24, 1987. The applicant at that time (the William Lyon Company) received approval of subdivision layout and conceptual grading. The current applicant (Grupe Development) has acquired the site and is now submitting plot plan and building elevations for design review apprrval. ITEM A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tract 13441 DR — Grupe Development September 14, 1988 Page 2 B. General- Grupe Development proposes three (3) two -story floor plans, each with three elevation design schemes. The homes range i- size from 2,044 square feet in area for Plan 1 to 2,580 square feet in area for Plan 3. Plan 2 has 2,266 square feet of living area. All of the units have two -car garages. C. Zero Lot Line Issue: The floor plans are designed to fit the zero lot lin e concept which was approved with the tract map. The homes actually abut the easement line rather than the lot lire (see Exhibit "E" on the site plan). This plotting arrangwnent allows the developer to provide translucent openings and architectural enhancements on the zero -lot line wall; it also circLnvents certain building code requirements, such as a one -hour fire wall. The proposed zero sideyard easement plotting may, however, conflict with property ownership and property rights provided in the Subdivision Map Act. Under the proposed unit plotting, the private yard easements (typically 5 feet in width) are areas in which one homeowner has full use and enjoyment of an adjacent homeowner's property (see Exhibit "E "). This unit plotting arrangement creates confusion as to the actual and implied limits of the homeowner's property. It is foreseeable that many homeowners may attempt to reacquire property legally owned by them by constructing improvements (fences, balls, etc.) on or within the v feet wide private yard P asement which is being granted to the adjacent homeowner, under the applicant's proposal. Unfortunately, it would be very difficult for the City to prohibit this action through the building permit process, especially since the easement lines do riot appear on the tract map. Given the potential legal and technical p;ohlems associated with the proposed project, the Commission may consider^ several courses of action in approving this project: 1. Approve the project with conditions requiring an amended pap. 2. Continue the item and require the applicant to concurrently process an zme%ded map. The amended map should include provisions for side yard use restrictions (called "maintenance access easements ") which would be dedicated to the City. By prohibiting construction within these maintenance access easements (created also so that homeowners could paint and conduct repairs to their homes) it would still be possible to develop the proposed housing units with the architectural features (i.e., translucent openings) along the zero lot line side of the units. 6 PLANNIM COMISSIOu STAFF REPORT Tract 13441 DR — Grupe Development September 14, 1988 Page 3 with the architectural features (i.e., tran�,.ucent openings) rlong the zero lot line side of the units. D. Design Review Committee: The Committee (Blakesley, Chitiea, 'io emani reviewed a proposal on August 18, 1988 and recommended approval subject to the following conditions: 1. The units plotted on lots 56 and .7, and on 1,06, and 107 should be switched: 2. Where driveways on side -entry garage units are used, a minimum five (5) feet clear distance should be maintained from the driveway to the adjoining wall. 3. At least two roof the colors shotild be s._,Ared with tht project to provide variation to the streetscape. 4. Where zero sideyard easement homes side onto Victoria Park Lane, additional architectural detail should be provided, including but not limited to, window openings. As an alternative, the unit on lots siding onto Victoria Park Lane may be reversed ( "flipped "). 5. The top portion of the left elevation of Plan 2 should receive some additional architectural detail. In addition, the applicant should also exp,ore the use of additional architectural treatment to enhance the right elevations of all three plan, types. Note: The Committee reviewed and approved revised plans allHressing the above concerns at their September 8, 1988 meeting. IIT. FACTS FOR_.FMOINGS: The project is consistent with the Victoria 1slanRea omtmun y and the General Plan. The project will not be detrimental to adjac"t properties or cause significant environmental impacts. in addition, the proposed use is in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Victoria Community Plan, the Development Code tend City Standards. IV. RECOMENDATION: Staff redommends that the Planning Commission select p ,on 1 and approve the design review of Tract 13441 through adoption of the attached Resolution with Conditions requiring an amended map. A -3 PLANN1iii COMA 1SSIQN STAFF REPORT Tract 13441 DR - Grupe Development September 14, 199, Page 4 AML IRV ResP 11 : str ; ted, Bra r City PI ner BB :BH:vc Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Platt Exhibit "C" - Landscape Plan Exhibit t0D" - 6uiiding Ele:!ations Exhibit "E" - Zero Sideyard Easement Detail Resolution of Approval with Co-,ditions t j"= IL go 11 FAI ME i W.A -- L ITT OF } IANCHO CucA oNGA PLANNING DIVISloyj, Z NORTH ITEBI: DR TR 13441 TITLE: L ®CATION (NEAP s EXIIIBITs�,_ SCALE: _.,,a I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION ""* ORTH ITEM; E &AIEIT: -..IL SCALE: --nLne_ L'L- a .I- 0 CiTI' OF RANCHO CUCANiONGA PLANNING DIVI3IaN A_g ITE :: EI TR '13441 TITLE: BUILDING, E LEI! ATIt�NS EXHIBIT: D i E -5 .a ~i ji'' ., .� k l.r.rt AID ELEMENT OR ONE SIMILAR TO IT qw SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE FINAL BUILDING PLANS. C CAMONGA Pw NNING Division -/ ITEM.. OR Tck vugvi MILE: ELEVA.TION.S EXHYSIIT: lu EASEMENT LINE u Ll PRIVATE YARD EASEIKEN.2 TO LOT 2 PRIVATE YARD EASEMENIT TO LOT 3 LOT LINE LOT LINE STREET 4 ®R TR 134 *1 TITLE: IEASEMFN nV -Tmi� ,BXHlB.iT- E.�... SCALE: none ..• is RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 13441 FOR THE DEVEL)PMENT OF 115 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ON 18.06 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW- HEDIUH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4 -8 DWELL;NG UNITS PER ACRE) WITHIN THE VICTORIA PC.ANNED COMUfdITY LOCATED AT THE 110RTHEAST CORNER OF VICTORIA PARK LANE AND KENYON WAY - APH., 227 - 011 -07. A. Recitals. (i) Grupe Development has filed an application for the approval of Design Review of Tract No. 13441: as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Rr4olution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the sppl ica.Cia 'j". On SePt (mh�v °4, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a i.i_:)ting on the :application and concluded said neeting on that date (iii) A17 legal: preraquisites to the adoption of this Resolution have octatec -d. B. Resolution. THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows; 1. This Core*44ssion hereby s�afifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the a hove -referenced meeting on September 14, 1988, including ,written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as fltllows: (a) That the proposed ;project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and i (b) That the proposed use is in accord with the j objective of the Development Code and the purposes, of the district in which the site is located; and (c) That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Victoria. Community Plan and the Development Code; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION Nd., Tract 13441 DR - Grupe Development September 14, 1588 Page 2 Ak (d) That the proposed use, together with the ' conditions app7teable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or tmaterially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Comnission hereby approves the applicat €tin subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division: (1) All pertinent conditions of ResolutiAn 87 -104 approving Tentative Tract 13441 shall apply. (2) Where driveways on side -entry garage units are used', a minimum three (3) feet clear distance shall be maintained from the driveway to the unit in the adjacent loth Special landscaping shall be provided in this area to the satisfaction Pf the City +Manner. (3) The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the potential Fbarth Street Rock Crusher project in a standard format cs doton,.Anud by the City Planner, prior to accepting a deposit on any property. Engineering Division. (1) An amended map shall be recorded prior to the issuance of building permits conforming to t'.!e following: a. She lot lines shall be placed so that the dwelling units conform to either (1) City standard setbacks or (2) City zero lot line standards. b. For zero lot line units, the right to prohibit structures on the adjacent property within 10 feet of a building wall, which is located on a lot linen shall be granted to the city and a private building maintenance easement granted to the adjacent parcel whjch shall be shown on the Final !mended Map. 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adopt=on of this Resolution. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION No. Tract 13411 'DR - Grupe Development September 14, 1988 L Page 3 I 1` i APPROVED AND ADOrrt:1 TH S 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1488. PLANNING COMMISsior,'JF THE'CITY OFiIANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: arry T. McNiel Chairman ATTEST: Braa uller, I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Corimissior, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoirg Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,' passed, and adopted by the Planning Comission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of September, 1988, by. he following vote -to -wit. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: p -1 1C DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RA.TTCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT September 14, 1988 Chairman and Members of the planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Brett Horner, Assistant Planner i ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEFELOP,MENT REVIEW 86 -19 - si R ev ew o u Ong elevations an plot pan fog^ an 11,679 `square foot administration and worship center i" thin a previously approved master planned church facility on 6.8 acres of land in the Medium Density Residential District (8 -14. dwelling .faits per acre), located at 9974 19th Street APN: 2oe- 171 -31, 32, and 35 Associated with this application is Tree Removal Permit 88-37. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A. Action Requested: Approval of the detailed site plan and elevations. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North Vacant (I -210 Freeway right -of -way); Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre). South Single family residences; Low Density Residential (2 4 dwelling .units per acre): East - Apartments; Medium Density Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre). West - Apartments: Medium Density Residential (8 =14 dwelling units per acre), D. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Medium Density Residential Borth - Low Density Residential South - Low Density Residential East - Mediums Density Residential West - Medium Density Residential' ITEM B PLANNING C"ISSION STAFF,.REPORT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -19 BRETHK iY .N CHRIST CHURCH September 14, 1988 Page 2 0. Site Characteristics: The property slopes approximately 4 -5 percent from nortn to south. A 41 space parking lot exists along the 19th Street frontage. The church has an existing classroom building, a multi -use building presently used as a sanctuary, and an office building on -site. F. Parking Calculations: Number of N'imber of Type Square Parking Spaces :Maces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Church 550 1/4 seats 138 150 II. ANALYSIS• A. Background: The Church's master plan was approved by the ann ng ommission in ig79, in 1985 a 2,800 square foot . classroom building was app;o-.'. With this application, the church proposes to remove aF exist`ng administration building (a residential structure), construct a new 550 seat worship center and administration building, and develop a 109 space parking lot in the rear of the property. In addition to removirj the existing administration structure, the applicant also drop:ses to remove 14 trees and has submitted for a Tree R moval Permit (TRP 88 -38). B. Pesign Review Committee: The Committee (Chitiea, Emerick, 7Cr05ti7 rev ewe -liie proposal on July 7, 1988 and recommended approval subject to the following conditions. 1. The wood siding material used on the worship center's roof should be provided on the back side of the parapets as well as the front side. 2• The siding provided beneath the windows should be used around the sides aid top of the windows also. 3. Special paving should be used around the main entrance to the worship center to better integrate the two columns with the other building materials used in the elevations. The paving should be reviewed and approved by the City Planner with the final landscape plan. 4. The dirt lot adjacent to the proposed parking lot and existing day care center play area should be planted with turf or other material to prevent mud, dust, loose material, and other nuisances to pedestrians. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF RE PORT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -19 - BRETHREN IN CHRIST CHURCH September 14, �9E8 Page 3 5, The final landso -pz Man should include parking lot trees that provide appropriate shade and that do not represent maintenance problems. C. Technical Review Committee: The Committee reviewed the project their a+mee ng on u y , 1988, and determined that with the recommended Conditions of Approval, the project is consistent with applicable City Standards and Qrdinances. D. Environmental Assessment: Staff has coMpieted Part II of the "vfronmen a B and has deteminod.that no significant adverse imparts would result development of this project. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of--th67Uneral Plan, The proposed use, building design, syte plan, together with the recommended Conditions of Approval is in compiiatcee with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends ai;proval of Development Review EB-19 anatssuance of a Wegative Declaration. Res fully s itte Bra 4e City Planner DB :BH:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "8" Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "D" - Elevations Exhibit "E" - Tree Removal Permit 88 -38 Resolution of Approval with Conditions V. G z�P 0 CITY OF RANCHO CiTCAMONGA PLANNING I?IIVYSION 34 19 7W IU-r Wwrs NORTH ITEM: ®R 88 -ig TITLE: __ C-QAilQN MAP EXHIBIT: --A =____� N 14 7u S"ffmr NORTH ITEM: OR 88.19 TITLE: ®ELAILED SITE PLAN EXHIBIT:,_., SCALE: none ,.�, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION 2.,(, a 11 UlTno 7ML WCALTVM I, GOLAWA PARVOWJA- A..*"- wa- mufflumoKu T"- AcmkWWA A�VvArwvwwm MUMMY Lj*Ajvp4LjA.""ftw powbelk ewwl.z .00" 8"PUBL. ma 'Comaox* - Qw M—dW Mmow� amm"W" mmi% - '.., VOWL. == WWAM ft&Tr. CM W. MEM��� GnotNe Comw eRartoneeR C"M@WA - C. NORTH ITEBE.- OR 88-19 TlTLE:QQNQgPTgAL Ll&NQlQ&WLAl EXHIBIT: _Q__ SCALB., -ao—ne — E J I-.iCRTr 4 F-6avA 'IOU - N- ,r<BH,p _G.dTER WMSr MLZVATIOW - WORSNiR cE►lTeR % � +nu..c: ,ca Sourw KLWAM)it. '_YVOLl�4 ` dEFltLLt mAmr mum.%ruw ;i tdrQrRss4w. crairmR QTY O A NCHO CUCAINIONGA PLANNING DIVISION_, ITEM: DR TI °TLE: ELLVAT� EXHIBI YT's Z Q V_) G 0 _Z Z Z LL Z LU 2 O.. Q of W W Z O U LL U I- LLJ 0<- a City of Cucamonga GENERAL INFORMATION Free Removal Permit DEVELOPMENT 1 .2� - OR MORETHAN 6 TREES OR50' LINEAR FEETOFWINDRO Ordinance No. 276, pertaining to the preservation of tree• on private property, requires that no person remove or relocate any N:oody plants in excess of fifteen (15) feet in height and having a single trunk circumference of fifte :n (15) Inches or mere and multi• rurks having a circumference of tllrty (30) inches or more (messured twenty-four (24) inches from ground level), without first obtaining a Tree Pemoval Permit from the City. 3'0 BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: LOCATION OF SUBJECT SITE: 1974 I-! -M ,371 E— �jj��, ��[.� NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF APPLICANT: 41174- Ally ae J�.df•%�j�1.,D 4t,4h610 t'32.42r�1 irJ a i4aisr- ` ?Ay. -- NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PROPERTY OWNER (if other than applicant): K(� REASONS FOR REMOVAL (attach necessary sheets): __� At,,.LAW C'DrJ�"t►2JGI'l�eJ dF WSW Votac 44t to PROPOSED METHOD trF REMOV d.: t"�LcS11�1 Si41t► . $l[ ci G+ , �'J2 �:•iFI _ APPLICANT'S SIGNA ADDITIONAL FILiNG TE: 9' -47° 96 This application shall include a plot plan indicating location of all trees to be removed and retained. The species, number, and size of tns trees to be removed shall be so designated. It a tree is diseased, then a written statement from a licenssd arborlst stating the nature of the disease shall be required. ACTION F-vattfstiion of this &WIcatI= is baW an tht edLg a an the tram sido. �❑ APPROVED ❑ Oi',WIED By: Reasons: Date: Notification of application shall be given to property owners within a three hundred foct radius ten ' s Prior to approval. It no appeals are rrcelved; then the permit shall become effective ten (10) days fro date of action. This approved tree remo al permit is valid for 90 days from the date of final map records z or building permit 'issuance, whichever comes first. Should applicant fail to remove thb trees within this 90 day period, a new permit shall be required, unless an extension is requested fourten (14) days prior to the expiration of the permit. _ Q EXHIBIT E 1 . Condition of the trees? Trees are healthy. 2. Proximity to an existing structure or Interference with utility services. I itZ 3- Is filere any conflict with Propos3d improvements? (Streets, building pada, walls) Yes. Several trees are located on the building area arldsome are located on a new drive aisle. 4. Proximity of other trees In the area. to the trees to be removed (not in a windrow). 5 Effect of tree removal on the aesthetics of the area and the public health welfare and sai'cty. Minimal effect on the app2arance of the church facility. Proposed new new trees should improve the sitilation cons 6 Can the tree be preserved by pruning or relocation? jiWjy. It is unlikely that the trees could be relocated due to their size. The applicant may wish to attempt fe-location. 7 Do the trees constitute a significant natural resource? No. 8 . A,e the trees required to be preserved by any specific plan, condition of approval or histor:,; land mark cosignation?-NO. Is an arborlst required? NO. _recommends 8-29-88 Brett Horner) Assistant Planner EXHIBIT E RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 88 -19, AND RELATED TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 88 -37, LOCATED AT 9974 19TH STREET IPo THE MEDIUM DENSITY RESIbFNTIAL DISTRICT (8 -4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) - APN; 202- 171 -31, 32 and 35. A. Recitals. (i) Brethren In Christ Church has filed an application for the issuance of the Development Review No. 88 -19 as described in the title of this Resol :"ion. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to is "the application ". {ii) On the 14th of September, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duty noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (III) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. Affik qr NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the PiannIng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby :specifically finds that all of the `acts set forth in the Recitals, Part A. of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on September 14, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: Street with a (stree tf ro application ¢e of 344 applies and property depth h located of 824 at feet 7 and 9is presently improved; and the property t b the south that to site consists ofhsin leefamilteresidences, the property to the east is apartments, and the 9 y apartments. property to the west is 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That to Proposed project is consistent. with the General Plan; and 4D RESOLUTION NO. D°V_ZOPMENT REVIEW 88 -19 September 14, 1988 Page 2 (b) That the proposed ase, is in accord with the Objective of the Development code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and (c) That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of tie Development Code; and (d) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the pub14- health, safety, or welfare, or materially' .rious to properties or improvements in th'e < I nity. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and consii6ered in comp`iance with the California - Environraertal Quality Act of 1970 and,, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division: 1. The woo? siding material.used on the worship center's roof shall be provided on the back side of the parapets as well as the front side, 2. The siding provided oeneath zhe windows shall by used around the sides and top of the windows also. 3. Special paving shall be used around the main - entrance to the worship center to better integrate the two columns with the other building materials used in the elevations. The paving shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner with the final landscape plan. 4. The dirt lot ;adjacent to the proposed parking lot and existing day care center play area shall be planted with turf or other material to prevent mud, dust, loose r7ateriai, ar;d other nuisances to pedestrians. 5. The final landscape plan 0all include parking lot trees that provide appropriate ",,.trj:,g and that do not represent maintenance problems. 6. Approval of Tree Removal Permit No, 88 -38 is granted subject to replacement planting as required by Munici pal Cade Section .9,08.100. Existing trees shall be protected during construction. 11111117111 NO, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86,19 September 14, 1988 Page S , Engineering Division: k I. The developer shall obtain a right of entt'y easement from I the property to the west and pave the driveway to provide ` for two lanes of traffic to the satisfaction` of the City Engineer. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.. i APPRO ?'ED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1988. f. PLANNI?,u U'VMSSION_OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry to , airmen II ATTEST: Brad 1t er c re ate—' G' y I I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Comnissioh of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commissions of the City of Rancho Cucamonga - -at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of September, 1988, by the following vote- to -wito AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ` NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: rn N CL S F'''dpp'iwuou�M> 0 6� o e Y Y O nV ate. 4wy Y Y.L R «� [�:t .C.Y Yptj -Y spa YY AoYY G4 C.�`� Y• O (V 10 4 f• N �Y N V �° p YQr NE•p ee uw 51444 ,y ��NC Y YZCp Ca.g r t. dw a °ucv�`w�� e Ell uw o.a'Tell 0 O Y b Y N o � 2 N O CW. d W O o O •q a z uyy �'.. "{ ' a q� 2p6 lax pl C Y w IOU. e w N 1_y.G p I'J1. Cr Y.Y YA 'YGQ a, Ls in- oq +Df� 11e•Nr OI qwM �y r C:. '�I'�wr Aw. wwriVY�,�' �l C:A Ai 4 �•o �y Y�p�J' =9� aCCi$ MME nPC •p u- p.�P yN� GjY qpH IS GC U YUV F �AA`w CyO• ri Nr'� M i01Y� 41 RE pL/ 4 Aa AM�i 3 NY 6 wN°. s s ac ,fit G�.y 6 01 Np q M� g L =' vs. yjJ vy. Y 2 e 8 i N !94 �YYW11] 4 Aa Y V~ O +aT C Yf O.r MOUY aY+ <Q L 4�� �C V A ��.YiO •Li� �� .� +Sc NL .:•ar a +'a_'° ce �wsN ' ��. eLa° ��•'Y �'. a' L N e�. • � A e). � q rY. � Y Y 'N O.GY Q � � O �Yy ■CBY, N 1 :' • N � ' M q T i� tO. 0 �.. a.Y� $ ^opr8 �o� ACA C. •�uY� ■pV.�°�• LG�Y. '. L�6� �y�. V tL.- see LLL w l'OS aG.V NY rTj � :_► eY0 '�C UL�� iM fig QQ6N� "L`^ii ��3�Y �L`x ^g ^�'� o�•»ciyyb��i�C 'kt'L"� r C+=���' y'� 4 yOC. YN V ^ �j �. � E 0^ Y•rr L v ^v od �� '��•G CN a °.N Y!�'�Y YQMY {L/ =�O�VV y� +��w A�. / �O•C A. {n�g1. ~Z.SI 'k L4IM Y1l hGINa y .CN Ya G�•O G4i a V w■> L GSAJ ��N O L'W^ 'y�`�•YA .`�.^.. °•M sag.. wN ✓C' =Y. ®r� ^aM �� YPC C^ 6 yaC�V�.�puW >N,Eq�M °"YY1O.P. ° �pc yGq s.- aNir a �ygpyn>l� ioe� ° +'; �'Y�" $ c" `► NCO M 4N•�•w� w'C r�aY G^ ��9� YO O"F >Y_.r V..Mi �,y'i �r Gs �^ o�•i Q.a. q iNT`)iG pry N O f•r_�+yp �46,ywM 9'~ e � e� VaNN Y__p O T Qr �e a' INN �0)•. f�1• yy G {{,� eyy s iOOY {. N a $ 666 _tyC�i i. yYpL�.r ®piM'MM � � y1 6.'T, O�qL r_cOV Is- ^ �0w•G NtAyii f 6d 5N2 �M TL 91- -o7 G .SLAM N` C e �e n• Y _ Ll G y@ y LYY. y WM �Q ^$ 4� s.GY i i _ rrs e,N Myw�grL 0g0�. rN �i -YL -if- ^ 1gc w^ 2.— N 2fo +L ca ^�i ".� .23—jL Ise L -•+ �� �g 11343.5-H. �O ®L NYo�p N��Oa ppu{� aa°e. egg -4 y°=, ^ ,.�q•3. ^. V • Yj Nr Mly. •.N G Y �jCCNI. py.c a }1d �•i [Y1^ 'Y g. yl` �a dy� 1-�SVC C��$f 6iwC. 'V Cr C''Q CNCOI]G`�t N�YYyy. G«QOy ^.�LppN y y!l O ~kYYyLC�jyw NCgVC 7 CtY Ci 0 2 46 gam' ruM 6y �+�y° Y "C rl�J d;gN QQ.`i i°qq €fN .].:TL` Qp C 4C �^O �p� °,N� �� ��•�'��NON� O'er K�� � N i «sQ Lp � E! '�Qp q$�E+T{Lp 4Li4 °3 $�o k yyL a:-FIT La O� NAM N Cg C > Lc Z---ii Ui >� rOY ��p6. Y{1,9�N .,�p.' GZC7..31 VZ6=0G.. w..l O^ M,� N' °YyNM LV.. °w� V uO9w1N. ^�yy■ +� ��$ M�C a rC �C� GCM.�O�. WcG aO�-p fiCO�.. NYaTi Ly.^ °V Yr YY 61i• COL pJV t ip >�¢p {�'1y >gypi '`� 4 V •�. V Y L� a e E "M p � G Y y eh COL p p. t11C a wS rtNO <rMwX yw iv '�a.&3�.:�. ,G €YL6$ u AMJt.N ! 9Si1L IO h Cd Qt �f g r O a Eli cY$'1O BE .YL. q�pO tlN ipJ CY «+ VYO.N C4.L�.uw V ^Y gG ��q iVi N.�40 Lir.�U.M .cL SVyONiTP BOIL�yO ■L�.'� y MY OIr LMC qV VL. �Y g�D CNVtl l�pT3 aN .0 V ig10 HVp1y jV^ '� 'L: pS CV YOI �L q�. r O Nygt u sQ°^t. N 6NOO•r.^ G^ Vq NNO.�a� ^Q F.. �yi posyyy, rNi$~� 60 1�1� /, c�. 2.• °��lyy a� «.oq" �� qg. «�. �} G C L G N K M t ! LL O N 4p Y Q 'N 4• C Y N Y p^ �CC /0�1�. SO ^NpO Nm �O fiOS OOI4L C.G� oQC �P �. 4�M L 1OIY `. 12 i Oq Opo O.p=r~ �C N�lt RLiY O 4.tyr �+N.06q LOI« pV���. GM �IDN� q +e�f YYEY 1�"@ NNj O.N '�� Nta V.C_ it �yy YYtl PAC _ V 4Cr WN Y 11. 31 �O ON I.GG� L q CH T M!q 01 Mme. M; �.p to {pY�N.�M 4q� -.Eq QQ�1 Nyyy VY�L ■ _Y ! e m MLA q q tl', C C G 6w q PN 00 q L O i O q � N� g! L •�I°.w 1 � ^.'mq �jo.LVg Na1r�+'Y «gyL.�..y �.N. a ILia It �Np Ib ^N %.K Gn:6 yMq� C�NM w..Oi�N. O! �FM Y G�GwUGr d Y y O� OP ,�(I►Py ^qY qq S:P 4N L 1'gL01 � yN L L I�N.y S�I G_ry _N 9 Vw aN CMy �Op1.q ��m y� ^��dN Na t�q Ip U� ]a 9 F M L KN C-2^ i yq1 p � ` xy L 1 ^vpp yy .• �i «u � ud� tltl dvv c "L aYi of a 1'pp ILi1ac e Y M c q 6 d. X 0 01 O L p e 7 N L C L C p LV DM A 9 MT _M O a O yO@N p9YC Coo o p `aK c a � LZ^ C 4 P I My g N� N N L Y L C C. YiNYi 1 25 G pIM o'v N L C Ngsg wear. � K�Myy S 83 O IIC war m. Y b tS C L aq 845 Oi C i A Y r, A ea y L � D® q M c$ VM V M L M N �S LAr N� Y C 01� M yL ep M N N p �C O spa° a zy 0 Mao a YP s y« C Yyy L O N 2`5 i lA F i a L 4 Gp �o r!c ie�+'yp O Z yy a L T µ M ■� a T�4,� qNN V V M u iaMP 'a w} C I A O 4 Z M q+ OV K OIN NgLM. i 4 M V ,0 4 n� S ^. w« C^ q C C L 6 LP Sy� �C d^ A -S q S 7 tl a� S syr N C M yy � N' 6 c PP�G11 u. !CON FD.N KV <O CDNC 7. 845 Oi C i A Y r, A ea y L � D® q M c$ VM V M L M N �S LAr N� Y C 01� M yL ep M N N p �C O spa° a zy 0 Mao YP �a{{{D�'g1Y N C y 0 y« C Yyy L O N 2`5 i lA F i a L 4 Gp �o r!c ie�+'yp IL V pLO wo.{gd�o tlP O q p L-mar.. iC -. 1. we •yN ■� a T�4,� qNN V V M u iaMP 'a w} C I A O 4 Z M ^ N P C G C My Cy■ N^ nL:�gG�II 4 q � G � yc V ,Cy Iwpl • g IY O. W ttt�G��•N u N '1J c Iu F; aNa � c e .4... u Ner � von Y 3� 70 p' tl N �Oatl i 6 a 6 4 ? L V H � p�p ° V L NV C Yq Ah LLd F NQ .N. ■ �' o�Y `oN yaaCyy C d d 3 `aK s v C6 o A � >Ea � qAL u. u COY Cy_ 01yy; W� p v �� q M90 Ca N.M 9 QY.e.Q Y �L W n �cgY: uca ^ cry ^YY�y. w YY• l 9L 4$ tl4C CCoos Y $ L V y LLI sC .� a y.. M N .-W lo o -ail y� _` M C ' Lis r 61 a-- .ass 4 =-. '.!I � N y Lr 6 Val H a �1PY-1 •N Y W •'. ii Nt+ > GCVO c 4W 6a6. w. 5 N Iilq 4�° °v s:0y 4 O V ^w° C L q �N 0 y �N ~C ?. C.0 Y' N wM CQY� ypV � V .« N Y .s y c N Y sa «d4 ASS W a 4 aNa � c e .4... u Ner � von Y 3� 70 p' tl N �Oatl i 6 a 6 4 ? L V H � p�p ° V L NV C Yq Ah LLd F NQ .N. ■ �' o�Y `oN yaaCyy C d d 3 `aK s v C6 o A � >Ea � qAL u. u W 4 L�„N ^yam • o_N g aiO 4 9 Ca N.M 9 C �L W $ C etl C ~tlp�pA C v 31 ur, YY• l -E i.0. 4$ tl4C .- { I $ L V y va 94. a ei+�... .� a y.. C qe�qq�.. Ifu .-W lo o T> RE Y!° pC7 C ' Lis r S o ryf • N�.N C 4 LLY.• � LO_ 7. F�.�o N y Lr 6 Val N yL 1{Y C L d g�. u •'. ii Nt+ ' AaM� °c ui 2 3.41 w. 5 A y N Iilq n%. � d. � yM�$. -IT av S N� L V1` $�pj � Na yaaCyy C d d 3 `aK s v C6 o A � >Ea � nN u. W 4 +'^ea c o_N g aiO �V=V 9 CL Ytl�taN ■ A W Y � �L W $ C y u $ L ur, � YY! C! Y —t a 4$ tl4C .'rid L..C. Civw� a ei+�... .� a Y ME tl' N 7, C qe�qq�.. Ifu .-W lo o T> RE Y!° pC7 da • N�.N C 4 LLY.• � LO_ 7. F�.�o N y Lr 6 Val N yL 1{Y C L d g�. u g u1tE HIS $�pj VY 3 YLLM i3 UT z u. +'^ea ry aY >. g aiO Y C w 94.9 ^G'VG ^n '�L$ y u $ L ur, � YY! C! Y —t a 4$ tl4C .'rid L..C. Civw� VG ay�aV Y ME tl' N 7, C qe�qq�.. Ifu .-W lo o T> RE Y!° pC7 da tln nN' e... LLLL tMR n• Q�.w� J C4 C• 4 u. ry aY >. u rd y u $ L y C � YY! C! Y IS n fi Y 3YL�. VG ay�aV N.H L .MOO. tl k^ da N yL 1{Y C L d g�. u g u1tE `Lim t7 C• 4 V LHI Ra �w N O a G _r E 0 �o iv Vo �o �o a� $" 4r uo N�� v YC VO. 4Y �� b b N O N c is 2 gig A O N tax =L� as .5v W N W Y Y N� C CC� O• rP V y Y w QQ 9 Y 4 'x V q r p N � O Y v oc " qC M � R I , 7 U9 9 a'- d' O�cL�YiO W 5 olcil t� E `pill. yC�M l `` V Y... .v Y µMS n N V ~ ■. �I d q YQa q �.G C �' CP �� IAp V Ol « ° Ica V,G• ,oar e:�pi �� N g c �I.nno »gr�'c °'a'+x. ��p��g L. yj C pY �N 333rrr tio,uw� Yo ■40 to M N 9L��IIII pp� L y^ pY QLQ1� ��1pY i1y ^ ..po.��� NOCp yyi.0 COO ^q �q �Q t G ti O �. Q Y g �� `R; -1 µ Z; 06 VOyV'. O A L A `$y"w Q O bGa dN.': os Sv t.� }' �} moo° xa "o _� ■ ■Ni p� ic���o xo ^» g, r cl �C ems. O N6 M �? « Q� qV. �. �� w..T70p ^Y ^A +O1' N »nLB U—L � V "•.�� C.t G " �I N �¢�s 6 N "N'C 74N VC wC.Y 1iQ A�'OU C V O C W b L .a 2 L .0 u N 'ft I y 4 4 V LHI Ra �w N O a G _r E 0 �o iv Vo �o �o a� $" 4r uo N�� v YC VO. 4Y �� b b N O N c is 2 gig A O N tax =L� as .5v W N W Y Y N� C CC� O• rP V y Y w QQ 9 Y 4 'x V q r p N � O Y v oc " qC M � R I , 7 U9 9 a'- ms olcil t� E `pill. yC�M l `` V CCV YOC L �C eat N V ~ ■. �I d q YQa q �.G C �' CP �� IAp V Ol « ° Ica V,G• ,oar e:�pi �� N g N. L V I ��,^•,, »gr�'c a�` ��p��g L. yj C pY �N 333rrr tio,uw� Yo ■40 to M N 9L��IIII pp� L y^ pY QLQ1� ��1pY i1y ^ ..po.��� NOCp yyi.0 4ZIRfIC 4 Y8Y1�� �q �Q G ti O Y �� `R; ,5:8 Ki CN 1CY � Xx <Oi f3-/13 Ar C mm Y G va rl v `pill. yC�M i eat C �' CP �� O. V Ol « ° Ica V,G• i. oCgi g N. L V I L. yj C pY �N 333rrr tio,uw� � Rrw wa}{v}{yy��p��i o L, ^ ..po.��� NOCp 0 4ZIRfIC 4 Y8Y1�� �q �Q G ti Ar C mm Y G va rl v POT VF,paY {t � g a & � p V■yy x D V '� CCGY yyY yN pp Y 9 CL D C� G '(Uq� � � C Va F `4. y O.V } 1! GJ«� ov ^ u`yO1 L V V fa G C d appY q{� Y :GV > Y ° \O ~ ' �. O_r ^' (1G rO� E \YN!'1 UGC p, �1 £.�CCV Ou CYy �a Cep a GG LY•6r. r ^L LN• p"L�r VL. �L)^ riy qGyW �u cw'f n UY O �O C. Sq �P Q i� n;+ +.j L�ntN WM E�7 QCCf SN yC 4i r► VLF �;VC L .;r L'� p N _ ^n Yw W M L gH�eV aOarJ 4 HO �:�i !z Go WM YI'id x °o.� Cvya gwViC V W `�s I 11 I �I I I I l o I I I a N L M L C A W p A M k'� Y V L 6 c ay M G � d a so a sY+ d aw c na YEN LsL ^ tl O pN p � q Y'L N N Yy' u II� M � N 4 M U r L G b h C C L ft-L L4 C N L A M y Y = y C V i 0.8 S^ 3 M 3 Y +Y V p o °= •7 g V � � C L U N rl N I I d (wo i ^ w QF a N V S-!i Z d y � N 4 �CL�tY M N a0 4 p� O n v� a 4 N mot` _tea 1 C H C v- oHi V i.r W 9 ■■ V Y� C6U u8LL'h' Nppp n.- o n 6GJ �Lg�iL V` gh wN k- C i.-ME Cy~ CLm a L �p C� Cmryi �x q�qNN. L Oe^. as U b YLY�+ OtIC ... � LSw p{L q nNV NpW t d (wo i ^ w QF a N V S-!i Z d y � N 4 �CL�tY M N a0 4 p� O n v� a 4 N mot` _tea 1 C H C v- oHi V i.r W 9 ■■ V Y� C6U u8LL'h' Nppp n.- o n 6GJ �Lg�iL V` gh wN k- C i.-ME Cy~ CLm a L �p C� Cmryi �x q�qNN. L Oe^. as U b YLY�+ OtIC ... � LSw p{L q nNV NpW t t I x N iJJ a4y 'a L tl 6 V uy CON ° � L v z ado c�� Y �c Y" c� O r�p0. Ca� Cb'N wCi� +•" $Q� a C V V_N Y i O �O + L V GM wy u Qov � ry =CCCU �rY 9�NY4 V kL QS �'�aat 6 c:� ^wgiri a L. L w.c.. Nuj 7 L .V CL tlgy.uj oY Lc..v N N. gE�� E pO `4\ -sail Y C N N S,— d d p H V Y a EyLI KaiL w r Y�y T q4 V qiL • N M �^ CCY qO `W L Y i1 �iLV *1 i g 5 A` .3 ZZ I �..a b— Y � tv C S N C C a{{e1 x:5 Qi'tt C 231; YY `L1 •rs ` ' ° G Y fCiOM V W+ p i N 4 O.A� Gpp tl y Ytl p� Y V. N LO. y ' c M y� C +Y C�N wu.. X Ew n O� C 11�.t � =v �'. �rrY -6 0 eC�1 LLp V d >. FI R pq�_� `�Y� cfiN tNr N. mom. IL .a O N6 V 6 N.r� pp OVC,pO. ddVi} +p L rte. iCli i�7 PMa u NN 4N4 M{J 1,11 Mp ■ as {1iy'lSq yrytlj NOO GaGa334 � � � LYZ C' yR V rU .y0 C C 6 Lcc. Z 13 Y-k 231; YY `L1 •rs ` ' ° G Y fCiOM ei� Liz i ■w�a O�C1►. � O.A� Gpp tl y Ytl p� Y V. �•.1 V LO. �'u` c M y� C +Y C�N wu.. X Ew n O� C 11�.t � =v �'. -6 0 eC�1 LLp >. a .• ° + ° pq�_� `�Y� cfiN tNr N. IL .a O N6 V L ^S Y N.r� pp OVC,pO. ddVi} +p L rte. iCli i�7 PMa Ll E 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 14, 1988 MEW-10 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Chris Westman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIROMMERTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVa g 88 -27 - e eve op,:3en o inoa .,, _-a -BARTON DEVELOPMENT - u ings o a ing 69,968 square feet on 3,57 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan located south of Arrow Highway at the intersection of Red. Oak Street and Edison Court APH: 209 - 142. -34. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested Issuance of a Negative Declaration B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: Nord - acan -;-0 nciurial (Subarea 8) Sou {:h - Industrial;.Cieneral Industrial (Subarea 8) East- -. Industrial; Eaneral Industrial (Subarea 8) W «t Industrial; &mineral Industrial (Subarea 8) C. General Plan Designaticns: Project ire`- 'Genera n isstria i North - General Indw,trial South - General Industrial East - General Industrial West General Industrial D. Site Characteristics: The property is vacant without any significant vege ion. The site is naturally to the south. Thn project is Phase IV of an overall seven phase development plan which includes vacant properties north and west of this proposal. E. Parking Calculations: Numober of Humber of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Foo_ tape - Ratio u�ir�—d — Provided n acturing ,�b8— L/bu -�8 ---- ITEM C PLANNING COWISSION STAFF REPORT DR 88 -27 '• BARTON DEVELOPMENT September 14, 1988 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: A. General: : The proposed project has used the same site plan ormu a-as used on the alraady approved Phases. I -III. fhe Proposed use °s allowed within the General Industrial area and is compatible with surrounding a""ojects. The project is in compliance with the site development standards of the Industrial Specific Plan and the site desig,a is consistent with previous phases. Foitwing issuance c%f a M?gative Declaration, the City Planner would grant approval subject to conditions recommended by the review committees. B. Desi n Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the esior;'TeY ew Coen Wee (Larry McNiel, Bruce Emerick, Brad Buller) on August 18, 1988. The Committee wade the following recommendations for Conditions of Approval: 1. Additional evergreens and vines should be planted adjacent to the building.! and emphasis should be given to Red Oak Avenue. 2. Details of the plaza areas should be provided for Planning Commission review. Soe Exhibit E. is C. Environmental Assessm2ntr Parts I and' II of the Initial Study ave I been comp e e an�'ir. -no significant environmental impacts have been found as a result of the proposed development. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The proposed use is consistent with the Hera an an i:ETe Industrial Specific Plan. The bi.ilding design and site plan together with recommended Conditions of i.�►proval are In compliance wita the Industrial Specific Plan and will not be detrimental to the public health safety welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity, IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Plarning Commissior: issue a Wgati ve Declaration for Development Review 88 -27. AR il ner BB:CW: js D h' E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 88 -27 - BARTON DEVELOPMENT September 14, 1988 Page 3 Attachments: Exhibit "A" - ,�ocation Map Exhibit "8" - S.zE�Map Exhibit "C" -;- typical Elevations Exhibit "D" - Plaza Detail r' .-MiT =M. NMIT77 MIT I T7, , Ep: IF i EIT o - I I N WaUlU.LI LLLL!--L]-.-ilL LLL 1 1 r' CD CP i�- - zx oa r. CO) IV 1 11 E-11 0 E IE KE n O I VI ' r-� U] b x M2 - z� �_^ - RED OAK STREET I I tb r obi C° � W p o � C' :z 2-m" C=o 2-m" o r x G8 /0 N r C —? a 1 I f, � J r U C-1 O 0 �.d1 4� b ►-r t� v1 rp- � 1 _r qILLijjj L 1 I � n s I RED OAK STREET 0 .h am Ex r 03y f .00 t�- " CtJ G9 r D Cr�C� b �t~`3to to �n o f�C � pop 2 ca 0 � 1 _r qILLijjj L 1 I � n s I RED OAK STREET 0 .h am Ex CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Goo ovraMo�or z , n LU o DATE: September 14, 1988 U[_ 1977 i T0. Chairman and Membe-s of the Planning Commission FROM: grad Buller, City Planner BY: Sc.�tt Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88 -01 - eve opmen of a m xe use' Project consisting of a 46 unit condominium project on 5.81 acres of land in a 39,000 soyare foot Commercial Canter for a market /drug store, bank, and retail use on 3.56 acres of land in a Community Services District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the northwest corner of Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 227- 522 -01, 02, 03, 04 and 227 - 521 -65. Associated with this project is Tree Removal Permit 88 -11, requesting tha removal of two mature trees along Etiwanda Avenue. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13885 - NALBANDIAN AND CHIAU - A—de—velopment of a 46 unit E-n omin um proyeci on 5.81 acts of land in the Community Service District of the Etiwanda, .Specific Plan, located at .the northwest corner of Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue APN: 227- 522 -01, 02, 03, 04 and 227- 521 -65.- On August 24, 1988, the Planning Commission cord-cted a public hearing to receive all input and testimony on the proposed development. After receiving all input, the Commission expressed concern about the height of units at the southwest corner of the projettt and the relationship of the grading to the existing homes. As a result, the Planning Commission Conti ^cued this item to the September 14, 1988, Planning Commission meeting and, in the interim, will be conducting a workshop on September 8, 1988 to review the building height and grading issues. Based upon the outcome of the Planning Commission workshop, an updated report and resolutions will be provided at the Planning Commission meeting. A ly s ed Re BB:SM :m1g ITEm D, E CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT 7 DATE: September 14,1988 TO. Chairman and Members of the Planningtommission FROM: Barrye R. Vanson, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Joe Stofa, Jr., Associate Civil Engineer SUOJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND, TENTAXIVE PARCEL MAP 11394 - NALMRAN/cRIAD -- A aubdivi of 9.37 acres of land z parcels in the Community service District of the Etiwanda Specific Plixn, located at the northwest corner of Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue (APH 227-522-01, 02, 03, 04 and 227421-66) 1. PROJECT AND �'ITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Resuestedt",A snown on �Xhlbit pproval of the proponed Tentative Parcel Map as B. Parcel Size* Parcel 1 - 3.56 Acres Parcel 2 - 5.27 Acres Parcel A - 0.64 Acres C. Existing Zoning: Community Service District D. Surrounding Land Use: North - Vacant South - Vacant East - Vacant West - Residential E. Surrou ding General Plan and Development Code Designations: North - Residential South - Residential East - Residential I I West - Residential 0 ITEM F PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PM 11394 - Nalbandian /Chian September 14, 1988 Page 2 F. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant with 'uhe land sloping approximately 2 1/2% to the south. II. ANALYSIS: The purpose of this parcel map is to create 2 separate parcels A commercial center (CUP 88..01) is planned for Parcel 1 and a condominium project (Tract 13886) is planned for Parcel 2. !Both projects are also on tonights agenda. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The applicant completed part I of the Initial Study. to con ucted a field investigation and completed Part II of the Initial Study.. No adverse impacts upon the environment are anticipated as a result of this protect. Therefore, issuanze of Negative Declaration is appropriate. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has else been completed. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all nput -and elements of the Tentative Parcel Map. If after such consideration, the Commission can recommend approval, then the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of ai Negative Declaration would 'u be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, IV,W, i Barrye R. Hanson Senior Civil Engineer BRH:JS:sd Attachments: Vicinity Map (Exhibit "A ") Tentative Map (Exhibit "B ") Resolution and Recommended Conditions of Approval H MW -PAILCEL MAP TMA VIP -milry may s 1 -1 is n\ jl -,,'PARCEL n\ jl RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANC,10 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIOVALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 11394 (APR 227- 522 -01, 02, 03, 04 and 22't- 8- r. -65) WdERF.AS, Teniative Parcel Map Number 11394, submitted by Nalbandian /Chico, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 2 parcels, the real property situated "a the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of Califotara, identified as KIN(s) 227 - 522 -01, 02, U3, 04 and 227 - 521 -65, located at the northwest corner of Base Line Road and Eti3, 04 Avenue; and WHEREAS, on September 14, 1988, the 4 anning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above - described map,. FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: I. That the map is consistent with the General Plan.. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subeivisicrr and improvements will not cta,e substantial +nvironmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: si s 2f project been rev ewe n c.ndered io compliance with the CaliforniahEnirnmntal Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a NeFtive Declaration. subject SECTION the atta hed Standard Conditions No. and 1 the following approved e,:i Conditions: I. Overhead Utilities: a. Base Line Road - The existing overhear: utilities :telecommunication and electrical, incTuding the two service poles) on the; project J side of Base Line Road shall be underSroupded from the first pole o6 the east side -of w 10I I F5 ,r i PLANNING :MISSION RESOLUTION go.. PM 11394:- 'Nalbandian /Chiao September 14, 1988 Page Etiwanda Avenue to the first pole off -_i tQ west of Parcel 2 of the Parcel Map prior to pu51 is improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. The Developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one -half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. b. Etiwanda Avenue - An in -lieu fee as contribution to the future undergroundir• of thu existing overhead utilities (telecommunication and electrical) on the opposite side of Etiwanda Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to the issuarce of building pE7mits for each Parcel. The fee shall be d�"- half the City adopted' Oaunt times the lend ,;fs as follows: 1. Parcel 1 - -from th. centerline of Base Line Ros-1 to he centerslo of the driveway between P�rclftl 2. 2. Parcel 2 - from the centerline of the driveway between Parcels 1 and 2 to the north property line of Parcel 2. 2. The Base Line Road street improvements and utility undergrounding for the entire parcel map frontage shall be completed upon development )f either Parcel 1 or 2. The improvement; shall be ,coordinated, if possibl+a, with the City Pase Line Road project. 3. Etiwanda Avenue street improvements for the entire parcel map frontage shall be completed upon development of either Parcel 1 or 2. 4. Lot "A" shall be a minimum width of 28 feet. 5. The CC&R's shall ftlude the shared expense for the maintenance of the private an -sits street (Lot "Al') serving both parcels. S. Storm drainage facilities shall be provided to the satisi "action of the City Enginear upon development of either parcel by one V the following alternatives: F —`z•'' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION '°0. PM 1394 - Nalbandian /Chiao September 14, 1988 Page 2 j. Provide a story► drain system from the site westerly to the existing storm drain in Base Line Road at Swanson Place, if the hydraulics and system capacity permit. or b. Construct of � the Etiwand�a7 Area and Stor portion of Drain Master Plan includir.9 a retention basin near the northwest corntir of Foothill ° ,julevard and Cast Avenue. 7. The project shall contribute to the future construction of the Etiwtnaa /San Sevine reg ;anal drainage /flood �.ontr�l facilities by forming or annexing to a benef'4t assessment r of community facilities district or by the per' drainage fees as established by the payment Council- Formation be or annexation or fee prior to Vinalr/mPiatrc a Map approval ocurs first, issuance of building Pp 8. The curb avd gutter on Etiwanda Avenue shall be constructed in accordance with City Standard No. 307 for CoWe Curb and G�. >ter. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY '7r sEPTEMBER, InS9. PLANNING COf!'92SSION OF THE CITY OF RWHO CUCA14ONGA BY: arry e , a rman ATTEST: ra u er_ ecretary 11 I, Brad Bu11ce, Secretary of the Planning Conmissl°n if the C t duly nand Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the for,.going regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning commission of the r ontthafl4' IhcdayCofaSSeeptember,a1988t,1by mtet held AYES: COTM?SSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONER.b: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: � — F �y C a a �tl �Z w C w �L � S Z� itpt Tg sIi O .•'. �O A. MA A�= AMC Hr _C M • a Nve L�r •�?: 0r C� �A�. sY. r� �9. L �■ LY C .L 16' _�� M Oy Y - L E¢� 25.:g 5 asp _ �Eo �ogY �B $T Gc u' w tVtl ~r 4•��.. rLr� �e7�rtltl`N$qw ryas 'O .�,ttff i � ibe o� C �� � w a ®s; � � w• fi` �+ Kg q: i A Sfi r•o tar }�gyp i i ig HS M Fi H wiM i •�_ 5E Y i � Y !a Y tl C g� iyo YN q y A � 1XI � r`j� 'g r® � S Z� w y N 1{ •` Tg sIi y: Z E r 2k a ` . dggg � 4 qqb wiM i •�_ 5E Y i � Y !a Y tl C g� iyo YN q y A � 1XI � r`j� 'g r® 8 Z� t`VY sic+ ads• Pg sIi 2k a ` . dggg � EE w tVtl ~r 4•��.. rLr� �e7�rtltl`N$qw ryas .�,ttff 4! 6L w «•• v ° w e:t bK a« �o .O Ng H � C • 0 � v O I b'O sJ V� il` aLf aL _ 6P 2N -� gCa q LA °y ut? M L a L: N q` Fo � ° Ya° vy E 2 d U ZalU! ;« 'EL�:. ' � ' qV qn t � x V } 9 � a uN q a u O.O r d rs V- N m Gy r �Y ��a 3. °OCw ��+u r i p �~W LV wu is p Wc4� _,.,.�•S $ alm 9'yb Mm °'jc tj oNN. Y E C. ti� YC , 9�� ., «N sr r a' A4L q ry• MY w 40L � N. -tr tltl63CC` al c � GYM c ym� l.L•° � g � YY 1 usY w s� a• n m I 4! 6L w «•• v ° w e:t bK a« �o .O Ng H � C • 0 � v O I b'O sJ V� il` aLf aL _ 6P 2N -� gCa q LA °y ut? M L a L: 0 N q` Fo � ° Ya° vy Sl e. Vaz ZalU! ;« Z`= r4 ' � ' 8 Y r t � x V } 9 � a uN q a CVOY FL e \ V i r i LE'• \ °•� Y G � o.° � �� i� yp•. Li:B O 9'yb f,'.Y.V • �)4.1p4i C. ti� � ^� , 9�� yYC• 6 btl 40L � al 0 N q` � ° q Y �y C7 XIV ' � ' 8 Y r t � x V } 9 � a uN q a C + FL r $ 0 4�B pper,, pqa 9. 4 Yw of 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT C ..t DATE: September 14, 1983 TO chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner Bt: Scott Murphy, Associate P' -nner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88 -03 WHEELER—T- MWITMT7 e eve opmen of re feet on 0.63 in the ai can er an service-s-1-a-fTon ;totaling 4,416 square District (S bareae 2)0 of land the FoothilloBoulevard Commercial Specific Plan, located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard ar:zi Vineyard Avenue - APN: 208- 192 -06. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE 88 -09 - WNEELEZ & request to reduce the requ re par ng se ac Ia ong Foothill Boulevard from 50 feet to 40 feat and along the rear ortperty line from 15 feet to 5 l feet for a retail office dnd service station in the i Community Commercial District (Subarea 2) of the foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue - APN 208 -191- I 06. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTIG A. Action Re guested: Approval of site plan, grading plan, EUilTi3ng a eva ions, variance, and issurnce of a Negative Declaration. B. Surroundin Land Use and Zonir North = omas nett+; pec.a - C%,,mr,ircial South - Condc.aintums; Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling . units per acre) East - Liquor.Stove; Community Commercial We.;t - Vacant; Commiunity Commercial C. General Plan Designations: r0- ec fTe - ommerc.a North - Commercial South - Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) East - Commercial :test - Commercial ITEM 6, N rf LJ PLANNING'1:�,MISSION Z'TAFF REPORT CUP 88 -03 /VA 88 -09 - 'Wheeler b Wheeler September 14, I988 Page 2 D. Site Characteristics: The site is presently vacant with an roughly 2 from nortpaverage ope o � rrest to southeast. There are three billboards on the parcel t`;tat are in line with future building and circulation. areas. The Red Hill Liquor store is located immediately to the east,: of the lot and the Villa Paloma condominium project is located.to the south. E. Parking Calculations Number{zf Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Retail 4,416 1/250 18 18 Service Station 2,310 3 3 (under canopy) 7T' M MIALYSIS• A. General: The applicant is proposing to deaelop two retail buildings along the Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue frontages t ;italing 4,416 square feet in area. The gas pumps for the service station will be located along the east property line un(<er a 2,310 square foot canopy. Ti\e cashier's booth for the service station will be located at the south end of Building "B" as part of a "mini market ". As part of the development of this site, the applicant will also be making improvements to the Red Hill Liquor site located to the eass�. These improveients include 1) relocating thy. driveway from the In -N -Out site to the east side of the Red Hill Liquor site, 2) providing landscaping along- Fox-; -ill Rouleuard, and 3) providing designated parking spaces for the liquor store. B. Design Review Committee: The Committee (McNiel, Buller) or g na y rev ewe Me roposal on August 4, 1988. At that tis�,a, the Committee recommended that the following changes be iPco,rporated into the revised plans: 1. Textured paving should be provided in the driveway off Vineyard to the first parking stall. PLANNING COMMISSI ©N STAFF REPORT CUP 88 -03 /VA 88 -09 Wheeler & Wheeler September 14, 1988 Page 3 2. A sidewalk should be provided on the east side of Building "A" to connect to the public sidewalk along Foothilr Boulevard. 3. Trees should be provided along the south side of Building 81B1o. 4. Additional hardscape should be provided along the sheet frontages consistent with the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Four to five foot planter areas can he provided adjacent to the buildings. Also, an alternative plan stiould be prepared showing how hardscape areas could be provided to the buildings if busiresses wished openings to the street sides. >. Nine foot wide parking stalls should be provided along the east side of'Buitding "B ". 6. The entire wall a'c the south portion of Building "B" facing Vineyard should be rock. 7. The sidewalks along Foothill and Vineyard should be !� bordered with textured paving (i.e. pavers) consistent with the Foothill :Boulevard Sp -cific Plan. On 4Wgust 18, 1988 the Design Review Committee (McNiei, Jnerick, Buller) reviewed the revised plans submitted by the applicant. The Committee noted that additional hardscapc had been provided along Foothill Boulevard but thrt a consistent treatment was not proposed for Vineyard Avenue. The Commmittee recommended that the hardscape and landscape treatment along Vineyard Avenue should be consistent with the Foothill Boulevard frontage. The benches,'hardscape should be located in front of the rock areas of the elevation. The applicant has since revised the site plan in accordance with the Design Review Committee direction and is presenting V,em for Planning Commission consideration. C. Technical Review Committee: The major issue regarding the development of e si a has been access. 4 drive approach is proposed for the southwest corner to provide access to Vineyard Avenue. No drive approach, however, will be provided on the site to Foothill Boulevard. In working with the applicant, staff has determined that thy, appropriate location for a drive approach is on the east side of the Red }fill Liquor site. This location would require the closing : the existing driveway and the rnovai of two parking stalls on the In -N -Out site in oroer to provide a shared driveway for all three parcels. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 88 -03 /VA 88 -09 - Wheeler & Wheeler September 14, 1988 Page 4 kC en In -N -Out Burger was approved in 1579, a condition of approval was placed on the site that the driveway rr the west side of In -N -Out site mould be relocated to the Red ;fill Liquor site and shared access would be provided. The cond, "tion rrmtes that surety be posted and an agreement be exea;uted to the satisfactinil of the City Engineer and C4 ty Attorney guaranteeing the relocation of the driveway. In researching this particular condition, it appears that no surety or recorded agreement were executed to assure the relocation. In fact, after meetin with all interested parties to discuss tills access issue, representatives for In -W -Glut Burger have subnitted a letter opposing this driveway location (see Exhibit "Ell) . A condition of approval has been placed on the project that would require the appli ^ant to ohta;n permission frrm In -fit -Out for the relocation of the driveway and the removal of the two parking stalls. If -,n agreement cannot be reached, the applicant must taturn to the P1anping Cortmission for a modification to this condition. III. VARIANCE; As part of the development of tine site, the Lpplicant is propos ng to reduce the parking setback alon3 Foothill Boulevard from 50 feet to 40 feet and to reduce the parking setback along the south property bou.idary from 15 feet to 5 feet. The variance r- ;c,,ast along the Foothill Boulevard frontage is a result of the improvements proposed for tLa R ?d Hill Liquor Store si te. In effect, only a 6 foot area w.i the subject property is effected by the reduced setback area. The full 50 Soot se!tbdck could be met but this would result in insufficient parking For the Red Hill Liquor Store. In essence, the improvements proposed for the Red Hill Liquor Store site would be a vast improvement over the current. conditions. The ,sarfancs along tbf south property line pertains ' ;o an area that Is abutting a residential development and would normally be used to buffer the two use While there are no existing dwelling units directly south of the project presently, thQ are3 is planneei for additional condominium units. In oriar to achieve the full 15 foot l ?ndscape setback along the south property line, the square footage of the building would have to be reduced in order to compensate for the rkduction of the parking. At the southec3t corner of the site, however, the 15 foot setback would h;-,Ire to be reduced in order to maintain the existing alley behind the Red Hill Liquor Store. Due to the relatively small size of 03 parcel and the limited access, the Planning Commission may wish to consider the variance for the project sub44ect to dense landscape buffering (see Condition 13). G) +4- 4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 88 -03 /VA 88 -09 - Wheeler b Wheeler September 14, 1988 Page 5 IV. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has completed the Environmental Checklist an determined that the project will not have any significant adverse environmental impacts. , If the Planning Commission concurs, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate, V. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order for the Planning Commission to approve a var ance and the conditional use pemit, facts to support the following findings must be made: A. Variance., 1. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of a specified regulation world result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this code; t:id 8. That there are exceptional or extraordinary cl- r.4mstances or conditions applicable to the property inv;►ltved or the intended use of the property that do not generally apply to other properties in the same zone; and 3. That strict or literal interpretation or enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone; and 4. That the granting of the variance will not c.inntit.4te a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified ;n the same zones and 5. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or mdteriall.y injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. B. Condit !ise Permit: 1 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plans and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; Znd 2. That thzi proposed use, together with the conditions applicabin, thereto, will not be detrimental to the public hoaltro safety or welfare, or materially injurious to ` properties or impm emeits in the vicinity; and 3. "*hat the pro�osad use com lies with each of the applicable Provisions of , oothili Boulevard Specific Plar;. PLANNING COMISSION STAFF REP09T l; CUP 88 -03JVA 88 -09 Wheeler & Wheeler September 14, 1988 Page 6 VI. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Daily Re •art newspaper as a public hearing, the site has been pose , a�t8 notices were sent to all property mers witzIn 300 feet. V11. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission consider a public input. After receiving all testimony, staff recommends that the Planning Conlission approve Variance 88-09 and Conditional Use ?ermit 88 -03 and Issue a Edagative.Declaration., Resp ally tod,; 8r er City P4Yann�r BB:SM:vc "ttachnients: Exhibit "A" = Site Utilization Mzp Exhibit "B" Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Grading Plan Exhibit "D" - Building Elevations Exhibit "E" Letter from In -ii -Out Representative Exhibit "F " - Letter from Applicant Resolution of Approval for Conditional V;e Permit 88 -03 Resolution of Approval for Variance 88 -09 i I CITY OF RA mid% jV CUCANIONTGA PLANNING D(VISI YY L ITEM- TITLE. db EXHIBIT. SCALE h o z V 4 r 0 i CITY OF RA mid% jV CUCANIONTGA PLANNING D(VISI YY L ITEM- TITLE. db EXHIBIT. SCALE i :, �MwrtW1��L'GTf► 'y:.. �T ...- .��:�.�i�16 r1. fsn7ae. TP 1 2 1 9 F�.ws yr uj V LU 1a Al s f wa'i esRv►— �� 7 I 1 1emomE PtNAPS 11� �� i 3 f.RNOPY �f G° p I ' =a =-I fad' k Fo• -6.1 . t ' �•j 1 1 / i = L' ( � t , +'� 1 N � ►mow dilitw. h►y1> Irf - 1 • ..r ... Il 1A..1:tjq;. vA )RTi i C'I'TE' OF RANCHO CUCA,%K)%A TITLE' Dix- tSM E.l•HIPAT- le SCALE. G148 S _ 4 tt L4 0' i -� � - � � 1 T � J6 i • ' r r r � � / �f; co Id LU _ i s IL � O ILI r V ,9 O ► c °� ti CY In ul N 41 I V � r iif't or o'er jie` { = T 1f1 0 '0 • � Z� ��♦ 4 „a, �' `JG ° 41 .ii • t rw.a 1pc� � l co Nior L a '' ti, c yF N v i o of �-� a i, Irr 1. —T c. I IL 71 GJ I 11 ILI up 0 11 0701-02 o 9-14 -88 PC Aa� enda 2� of 5 gal (IR tmt., , TIP iP CANOPY NORTH & 'SOUT14 FLFVATIONS CITY CIF RANCHO CLUA,Mo.NGA PLA-NNM, D(vISM MEND TIT11- EXHIBIT'-jL--f- SCALE: H 13 M" '17 ir a eT CANOPY EAST & WEST ELEVATIONS gal (IR tmt., , TIP iP CANOPY NORTH & 'SOUT14 FLFVATIONS CITY CIF RANCHO CLUA,Mo.NGA PLA-NNM, D(vISM MEND TIT11- EXHIBIT'-jL--f- SCALE: H 13 M" 3i Rf J W • S.� Q� U 0 ,l t� r l F F< i i � � 1 3i Rf J W • S.� Q� U 0 ,l t� r l F< a � � 1 W J f—d. F Y t: i a s CITY O RAN CM CL' .Vi,NGA ITE.lt: TITLE::: l�9TS G) H- q I Ms. Nancy Fong Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91730 Re: CUP 88 -03 Dear me. tong: We arc, the owns and opera ®.a one o! i so for e u the �outh side of Foothill you know, Boulevard East of vineya :,-A Avenue in your city. It hag come to our attention that the two properties located immediately to the West of ; =r client,r, are the nubjeet oil a proposed development contemplated by a pondingi apP conditional use permit referenced above. lcation for a We have had the opportunity ,o reviaw a proposed master site Plan entitled SCHzmE 11,111 correspondences, (loll -8gy and wie, lyy this to register our firma opposition to that proposed Plan and the manner in which it will affesat our Property. It would appear to us that the proposed development of those properties is relatively intense and that the plan goes gar beyond what war contemplated by oitha_ `cite City or In -N -Out Burger at the time its development was a contemplating a possible cOmbination accssseb/d in April of x.979 and property adjacent and to the Wzst. property It in' our* understanding that the proposed development contemplates combining that access with more vhan one parcel of property to the West of aura and would not only result in what we would Our liant owhich unsafe we would but d em entirely unaG ept"lengand inappropriate. We wish to assure you and anyone else involved that we will cooperate reasonably in the which review of any proposed development would contemplate a combined access but find this particular Proposal to be both unsafe and at variance with our agreement wi'�h the City in 1979. 116-;4w . MOP 1 NICHOL5, STEAo, BOILCACI & LAMe R SOReti0. eO1LCAO R/ITNON. A PIIOFia OtONAL CORPORATION ATTL7Fp75Yi AT LAW O1 t9. LAND LNis O.. uslar THC FIRST INTCRSTATC SANK OF CALIFORNIA ROSCRT �, IIiCRSON "lu MOLOFF IaALS V. ■oLUassa 9tO POMONA W L WCST/ SItITC 400 w. DONALD F4 NiCN06a Jima Y. NOaRis w11CNASL 0. ONITN IOOgONA, C' .IIORq:A •1711® ilosl•le)a1 imb IAN90 NORRIS TCLCPMON 7.� } Oeiwlw! eNARLas N. eTlA N. DANICL. CATLOR ROSIN MCCRS TROCPCG tub• +feel _ MR •us •aI. IAFe Aj� Al 8, 1988 PI'SAas aePLV Tel R a.. sax save PCNONA,CAUFOONIA �ITee Ms. Nancy Fong Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91730 Re: CUP 88 -03 Dear me. tong: We arc, the owns and opera ®.a one o! i so for e u the �outh side of Foothill you know, Boulevard East of vineya :,-A Avenue in your city. It hag come to our attention that the two properties located immediately to the West of ; =r client,r, are the nubjeet oil a proposed development contemplated by a pondingi apP conditional use permit referenced above. lcation for a We have had the opportunity ,o reviaw a proposed master site Plan entitled SCHzmE 11,111 correspondences, (loll -8gy and wie, lyy this to register our firma opposition to that proposed Plan and the manner in which it will affesat our Property. It would appear to us that the proposed development of those properties is relatively intense and that the plan goes gar beyond what war contemplated by oitha_ `cite City or In -N -Out Burger at the time its development was a contemplating a possible cOmbination accssseb/d in April of x.979 and property adjacent and to the Wzst. property It in' our* understanding that the proposed development contemplates combining that access with more vhan one parcel of property to the West of aura and would not only result in what we would Our liant owhich unsafe we would but d em entirely unaG ept"lengand inappropriate. We wish to assure you and anyone else involved that we will cooperate reasonably in the which review of any proposed development would contemplate a combined access but find this particular Proposal to be both unsafe and at variance with our agreement wi'�h the City in 1979. 116-;4w . MOP 1 STRAB.' ®otc a l.Aea• . A7TDRR6Yj AT LAW Xa F 4nay Pan April 8,'lasg °Page. TWO- qw Wa hereby retest notice . Planning Commission es of any mantin s propoead development r the City Council where °2 either the be considarc'd the prop a ieQ to the hQ of ours or &ny , whethar, or not auch notice is r*Wirad by urs is to late. very truly yours, NICHOL3 s STUD' p�.iFI.BA*� fe A prc ssional Corporation B Don Dzs:rmj ald dr SolingMr a. cc: Rich Snyder Rich Boyd Bob t►i.11iams Buzz 2 i Wons Paul eelsr- Wheel3s Wheeler ArQhttects WILLIAM C. NOLSWARTM eMOMAS L. POW ILL A M. PAPILLA MARTIN J. STCIN CLINTON L. KUN$AP0 LACMLAN. FOSTER WILLIAM A. YERRICK MIC^CL R. TCNCRCLLI 6TCVCN MILIT2OX 'NORMAN K. M. Mmoc JOMN PETER GYsell 'E' KNAPR LCANOCRS JE.ONC L. AMANTC RAYMOND A MULLIGAN KARL - KNICKMCYCR IRENE r. SICOARTM IRCOCPICK C.. MOORE HOLZWARTH, PC,.WCLL, STEIN & PA,RILLA LAWYERS SUITE FOO 16400 VON KARMAN AVENUE OI COVNf CL IRVINC. CALIFORNIA 92715 MICMACL V. VOLLMER (7141553-1010 Via Messenger August 8, 1988 Scott Murphy Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 -C Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Rea. Conditional Use Permit 88 -03/ SEC Vineyard and Foothill DEar Mr. Murphy: TCLCCOPICR NO. 17141 603.9734 MAILING A0OPC50: POST OFFICE 'SOX 19772 IRVINC. CAUIFOR NIA 02713.6772 IN REPLY PCFCR TO: 5.379.067 CITY 01 RAAIC�O sLl ClR1 Ii7[�yGA NNtN� DIVISION AUG09INg , A. It wt.i ea pleasure meeting, you the other day at the Technical Review Committee meeting regarding the above - referenced CUP being processed by 'Wheeler & Wheeler on behalf of our client Park /Abrams Development Co. As you will recall, we expressed serious concern regarding one of the "Comments" in the Engineering Division's Project Report and Recommended Conditions which was reviewed at that meeting. The Comment at issue (Comment A.2.) called for a letter from In-N -Out Burger, which owns the second parcel to tha east of our client's parcel, approving the closing of the west drive approach on the In -N -Out parcel. As you pointed out at our meeting, this requirement is entirely unrealistic in view of the opposition In -N -Out Burger has voiced in connection With such closing. More significantly, and as I will elaborate further below, our client is concerned with In -N -Out Burger's apparent efforts to circumvent conditions imposed by the city in 1879 to In -N -Out Burger's development of its parcel, the effect of which would be to not only wrongfully prevent our client from developing their corner parcel but in fact to make such parcel virtually undevelopable altogether. When Park /Abrams first submitted to the City's Planning Division a preliminary site plan for their proposed development, the City advised them as follows: 9 HOLZWARTH. POWELL, STEIN & PARILLA LAWYERS AINK Scott Murphy IV August 8, 1988 Page -2- (1) That the owner of the corner parcel would not be entitled to a driveway approach off of Foothill Boulevard due to the City's requirement that driveway locations on major boulevards be a minimum of 200 feet from the curb return (in fact, it is our understanding that Caltrans has imposed a similar requirement with respect to Foothill Boulevard which is a state highway, i.e., vehicular access shall not be provided within 220 feet of the Vineyard and Foothill intersection); and (2) That the west drive approach on the In -N -Out parcel would be closed, and the existir:g drive approach on the Redhill Liquor Store parcel. (which is situated between our client's parcel and the In-N -Out parcel) would be realigned to the east end of the Redhill Liquor Store parcel and serve as the central drive approach Off of �othill Boulevard for all three parcels. This latter requirement in fact confirms the City's Resolution No. 79 -36 which, among other things, required that, as a condition to the City's approval of development of the In- N--Out parcel, such parcel's "west driveway" would eventually have to "be combined with the driveway for the property to the west as approved by the City Engineer.° The City has consistently reaffirmed the above requirements with Park /Abrams, and our client his continued to rely thereon during the many months that they have been processing their site plan and CUP application for approval by the City. In fact, the City has to -date maintained its position in this regard, notwithstanding the objections raised by In -N -Out Burger to the combined driveway approach. Indeed, the City's position was confirmed when, after submittal of alternative site plans for our client's project and several discussions with your predecessor Nancy Fong, Scheme A of the Master Site Plan submitted on behalf of Park /Abrams was approved with respect to the proposed design for the combined driveway approach on the Redhill Liquor Store Parcel ( "Scheme A Driveway Design "), as referenced in Ms. Fong's March 31, 1988 letter to Mr. Wheel3r. Per said letter, Ms. Fong required that for our client's project to go forward, their submittal would have to be entirely HOLZWARTH, POWELL, STEIN & PARILLA LAWYens Scott Murphy August 8, 1988 Page -3 revised to reflect the Scheme A Driveway Design. Such revisions wore in fact made and submitted accordingly. However, much to our client's dismay, although it appeared from comments by In -N -Out Burger's engineer at a major meeting of all concerned parties in February, 1988; that In -N -Out Burger would accept the Scheme A Driveway Design for the combined driveway approach on the'Redhill Liquor Store parcel, In -N -Out Burger has subsequently reaffirmed their opposition to the combined driveway and closure of their west driveway, as evidenced in particular by a letter Gated April 8, 1988, from.their attorneys to Me. Fong. This letters a copy of which I have attached for your reference, is both misleading and inaccurate in several aspectss as noted below. First, the April 8 letter refers to "a poseible combination access" and characterizes the Scheme A Driveway Design as "at variance with (In -N -Out Burger °s) agreement with the City in 1979." Not only does the language of Resolution. No. 79,-36 clearly require the combined access as a condition. to In -N -out's developments but it further obligated Ir. -N -Out Burger to both post surety and execute an agreement in favor of the City to guarantee that the west driveway would be closed in favor of a combined access on the Redhill. Liquor Store parcel.. Additionallys In -N -Oust Burger appears to contend that the combined driveway would only serve tae Redhill Liquor Store parcel and the In -N -Out parcel. Thio position does not maize any sense in view trr the location requirements imposed by both the City and CaltreY:`= (as noted above). Moreover, Resolution No. 79 -36 refers simply to the "property to the west," the only reasonable interpretation of which would mean to includA the only two parcels between_ Vineyard and the In -N -Out parcel. The most serious problem, however, with In -N =Out Burger's objection to CUP 88 -03 is that it is based primarily on the loss of on -site parl;iu9 which would result from the Scheme A Driveway Design required by the City. Since the City has made clear that the Scheme A Driveway Design is the only acceptable design and location for the combined access on the Redhill Liquor Store parcel, regardless of how the corner parcel is developed, In -N -Out Burger's objection to the loss of on -site parking is in fact an objection to any development of the corner parcel whatsoever. This G, N -Iq HOLZWARTH. POWELL, STEIN 6 P.ARILLA LAWYERS Scott Murphy August 8, 1988 Page -4- could hardly be whut the City intended back in April, 1979, and is clearly inconsistent with the City'a continued processing of our client's CUP for such parcel We are of course interested; that the driveway issue be resolved as quickly as possible, as we thought it had been resolved several months ago. But it would soetq that any fair resolution require In-N -Out Burger to abide by the conditions they accepted in going forward with their development. We continue to look to the City for guidance, and truest that the City will ensure some form of reasonable access from Foothill Boulevard to our client's parcel. Very truly yours HOLZWAR CIWSLC, STEIN & PARILLA NORMAN K. H. MIEDE ink NRHM:cml cc: Michael Abrams! Paul Wheeler Al Salgado 1 1 KESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCID CUCaMONGA PLANNING COpmmON APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88 -03 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A RETAIL CENTER AND SERVICE STATION TOTALING 4,416 SQUARE FEET ON 0.63 ACRES OF LAND IN THE COMMUNITf COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 2) OF THE FOOTHILL 90ULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER IF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND VINEYARD AVENUE - APN: 208- 192 -06. A. Recitals (i) Wheeler & Wheeler Architects has filed an application for the Issuance of the Conditional Use Permit No. 88-.03 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application ". ii) On the 14th of September, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City c Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said taaring on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Rr+solutien have occurred. B. Resolution. go NOW, THEREFORE, it is hero` determined and resolved by the Planning Corlmission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows; 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals. Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on September 14, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue with a width of 151 feet and a depth of 183 feet and is presently undeveloped; and (b) The property to the north and east is designated for commercial uses and is developed wiFh commercial buildings. The property to the west is designated for commercial uses and is vacant. The property to the south is designated for residential uses and is developed with condominiums. fc) The project, with the approval of Variance 88 -09 and the recommended conditions of approval, complies with all minim- development standards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and 11 PCANNMG CMIMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 88 -03 - Wheeler & Whealer September 14, 1988 Page 2 (d) The development of a 4,416 square foot retail center and service station is consistent with the commercial designation of the General Plan. 3. during the above-referenced public hearing �and cupone the specific sf nod findings Commission facts set forth in paragraph l and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: 1a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan., the objectives of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the publt health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) Thrit the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. 4. This Commission hereby finis and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issue;, r negative eclaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in, paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every candition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. A. Planning Division 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved site plan, which includes architectural elevations, exterior material and colors, landscaping and grading on file with the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan regulations. 2. The design of a Uniform Sign Program shall comr3iment the architectural program. The sign program shall 1 nclude all on -site signage including monument signs, wall signs, directional signage, service station signs, eLt, The AK Uniform Sign Program shall be subject to approval of the Planning Commission prior to issuance of building permits. PLANNING c0mmrSSION RESOLUTION N0, CUP 88 -03 - Wheeler & Wheeler September 14, 1988 Paine 3 - 3. Trash collection shall occur between the hours of 9 :00 a.m. and 10 :00 p.m. daily. 4. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. S. Tile entire site shall be kept free of trash and debris at all times, and in no event shall trash and debris remain far more than twenty -four (24) hours. 6. All operations and businesses _hail be conducted to comply with the following standards, which shall be incorporated into the Oeclarat"on of Restrictions and Grants of Easementre which shall be recorded prior to any lease agreement or lot sale agreements on site. a. Noise Levels All commercial activities shall not create- any noise that would oxceed an exterioi^ noise level of 60dBA during the hours of 10:00 pm. to 7:00 a.m. and 65 dBA during the hours of 7 :00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. b. Loading and Unloading: No pei�Iin shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing,, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, buildiag materials, garbage cans, or similar objects between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and ;7 :00 a.m.,, unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residentia'r area. 7. All street furniture, including benches, trash receptacles, light fixtures, etc., shall be of a traditional design to blend with the architecture. Sample designs and .�cifications shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. 8. Additional tree wells shall be provided on the south side of Building "B ". The tree locations, type, and size shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. g. The trash enclosure design shall have pedestrian access, roll -up /overhead doors, trellises;, and overhead screening to prevent trash from blowing r, "i. The design shall be reviewed and approved by the Gity Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. 10. The hardscape and sditscape treatment along FoothiTA Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue shall be consistent with the Foothill `ec::levard Spe-_-if:4 Plan including, but not limited to, the following: 11 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. r - - CUP 88-13 Wheeler A Wheeler September 14, 1988 page 4 a. Placement, lype, and size of trees, and b. Use of pavers as an accent at the corner and as banding and borders for the sidawalks, and c. Design of tree Well grates. 11. The final landscape plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. 12. Extensive landscaping, including densely planted evergreen trees, shalt be provided along the south boundary. 13. Conditio4al Use Permit 88 -03 is contingent upon 41purovai of Variance 88 -09. 14. The three billboards shall be removed. 8. g, eering Division 1. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for 66 kV electrical) on the project side of Vineyard Avenue and along the south project boundary shall be underground prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first as follows: a. Vineyard Avenue - from the first pole south of the south project boundary to the first pole on the north side of Foothill Boulevard. b. South Project Boundary - from the pole at the west project boundary to the first pole east of the east project boundary. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one -half the City adopted cost for undergroundi`ng from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of Vineyard Avenue and the property south of the project site. 2. Relocation and modification, as necessary, of the traffic signal shall be the responsibility of the developer. 3. Provide necessary right -of -way and construct right turn lanes on Vineyard Avenue. to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. G) bl -o?a PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 88 -03 - 14heeler & Wheeler September 14, 1988 Page 5 4. An in -lieu fee for one -half the cast of the construction Including landscaping and irrigation for the median island within Foothill Boulevard and for one- fourth the cost: of constructibn of the special pavers to be placed within the roadway at the intersections of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of building permits. The fee for the median island shall be based on the length of the project's Foothill Boulevard frontage. The fee for the special pavers shall be based on the square footage of the intersection. S. The developer shall coordinate with the developer of the Thomas Winery project for the construction of intersection improvements including relocation of the traffic signal so that the improvements can be completed as a single project. 6. The decorative pavement to be constructed within the public right -of -way shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 1. The developer shall obtain a right -of -entry for driveway removal and parking lot reconstruction from the ,property owner to the east prior to the issuance of any permits, 8. Drainage facilities to protect the site from drainage to the north within Vineyard Avenue s,hali be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to public improvements acceptance or occupancy$ whichever occurs first. 9. The drive approach on Vineyard Avenue shall be reduced to a width of 35 feet at the right- of4.-gay line. 6. The Secretary to this Commission sh411 certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1988, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RAM20 CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McHlel, CHI man ATTEST: Brad u er, ecre ary M-- PLANNING C{iMSS1,11-1 RESOLUTION No. CUP 88 -08 Wheeler & Wheeler September 14, 19$8 Page fi I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th ay of September, 1988, by the following vote -to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: commrSSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIOMRS: 4 , a W C�Y moor oua ity nLUU ¢¢L��4 wH� !!pp��^O Ra40. j1�o +. Qiw Y.� LL4 pN YCY� q @. it sy �ti �Ca aa'SY � °9M�E3■ awp p UMW M nu�tlo ee@��w°.a '1 CC°pA`LNL M 4�' yCN1N�y^ V^ a O W Ny� O O 1-- = N KKK a� a 0 tiV .Vi q j <j env Lw scan wa aw�wati No+. 4C .44 a °iie a 4{ � 4 €m° nru.sir � •��.' M n 01 >. • O 'p Cry` Y ._D 0� 1 Y. is N s Y 0 N G d� O Y w C C 4 Y. Y t•. O ppi Y {1 CNC uL� Y w L egg 4 L L p G yCa ;y C N Y Y= M O z LL4���� CC4. Y{Y� OIO �wY p� =Y4 yY LL Ii� M CN ��tY.A1 O1 C rL�b 4a �V 4 GY yb�M iC �161s� qo ��n `+u N ■ Nx 4vnb. 4M0 �Ew4 4�A �oY O V.ti V 0 4 v iq+v �uL?6 r° a 6 ■3 V YC Np aC CY�CN y4 C ^f3 x X03. f1!'3�N.�,1 OppbC M C S q �6\� 4+�Yw it O a---C4 ��O aNY Y�N Nqa CT'YtM OIA �Y AN� CC O YV4 � M e G r.' 'Z r uSS u. w4 \`I..T�•."4' yyam® r.O.yN N,N Nso.@. 1 Y� �gKis•u vC y C 4 C y1 4°. ueya n'd oGyrt <aaN. 4� a a,.,� -wc '•i� 30 -8 a i°Cf':iLnv r1 it t n: L. L ANOO 4 NaV■ yU� Y `O�iNY bpi �_S `P4s OINK Ya�'b Y`�"w GN r 4 4; a+44+ G N° 9 C 4 Pr a�� Y « C A4v {pta4 � ON +N ep�pN� �YyM� OCY�.r. OV.r. y C 6� py n� 1iS eO b P i O. 4'C M U �1. Y. YN aLwY K T > 4 ear S C N ��.yC4x.�C 6M 4a�. 3 �N �1 � y L _NF D' 8 «NMCt�'4e •1 G N �q i�y��ZYwr r1 it t C.i Q `J � 4 °aoq' Y a R 9 ^ � N N t CO +3 4LNL iT C� � iuG ¢� O w � C � 6 O +�W 'PAY a 'CY4 t ada c�e e Vd w y l ;:a L d � b a w Z � a w^ P L .p> M 3 � Y L Y O =1 g N C C y w a° a�a me N� c � ...IRew «a�`a O ��V q w V SQ -C cY a B� ns vc"'N V Ma � �tpjbis O p•,a t b R O�rN Y� CCY R q 0 S C iw•i N^ �o ti N r w C d war gi �i. u-3 ^�� KN�.Y OCR I T= as 6 M N q Y eO M. 9 uuU > L P a_ 4 N Y z i O � C � L CL � ytl g R4 wa hl 011SOMW %,& QUAY To At -i- - Y a w R q w M 'LOw� 9 Y W C11Y.0 ^�M NQhAVR VCu HP rsHi y O +Y�ML. a�y8 Tj 4 2� {q i .M- � Naxa Kg �J N ETSN WS W.��A .•v.o u% c r w G..RuO YC r3 LAP a c N�w R. afire °s'1 �. L =mNSaNM yQ CMu�r' yN9 Y NO N Y�YM �� ~ {. y O A LF w a gr yII s r yO 9, Q 6 ®p ap RG U ~ydL pa CLY' 61 >I ^� w NYY■ ¢ ^� M C. R s � RYYuS3 864 p � == L« O H.R C P� �� a� �wC�� n`V Nb OI^ r6 • • yY a�Mi. aw Np ^C. C V� c+ y'�. OCe� w t; Lu'u xL ^?Sit �bwti VL��s vc� c ou ^ Sw S"LIGy� AKkMkYC Qg M� YY E a INS 6 ~ {. y O A LF w a gr yII s r yO 9, Q 61 >I ^� w NYY■ ¢ ^� M o V R s � RYYuS3 N�d O V 01 Pr YP O H.R C P� �� a� �wC�� n`V Q. yYy�} C S� 6 d W p C CL� t. w O^ 9 ro N R w Y �� +y 1ti uy Y Y L ■� 04a Lla yY� C V� y'�. OCe� w t; Lu'u :ns� °w�u -nY37 ou 6e+o� 4+j Sw oz- V.EL C N 7 r a0 �C y Y y O VIc OCO S ;5 # Y I C y p V V C i�Ie •� b jK C t d C O N d 4 +ywu L t'A'r�> Mq. 'I S Np. =ace Kt Na u +•.y .iC V LN y LLL� JrJC 4au�1. 4Yw�'1� d .14N F�JY" aCNCw f � i or�U a �CfiN 7�N�Vy G R _9 s CY KL�+C LL� O'u7y YY ii. O44Y Z6 E 5 ELpi O mC O Z w Vd y y w }Leup� woPoco N t ne t�wu �g N °a qa. 0 ^ C X J O e e C V r. ^ Orr C NY WC �N Yy qQ LL00 �4.C.a dMp ^er. �+ •C. aI.L. {{ui NaO OOY d0 �� u�� 6 =��Y^ L wC1i Y y. q '12 ^0 q. L V, '� Y -0. �Q iCCl9 GYCU VYO Olr qOh1 �L s C Cn w 'L. Ox�O�.Yt Q l! x „ev mYwe +ip-1C o�S$,4�q••Y•��� 4���%� « •-L.nY +�q. rp Yr Ox O tlr. V ^ 'T y Of.7L cyu !ter ® ^Wi �M{1J QHq xNNC�Oy � ^A �W ^. C� sCxC �'t ewq LL Y AO�i .KIy gYiNr Q y �/ L V y Z. Z.w V - N Eli r a Y ys -z V —. L 2. cm p 7 0 4 0 SL •Y�Y YO.flf MM Nf.q 5Y VCL`L�d pCNV D.x p��}'N�y(Fi yMNt QyyA .^ML,� q. yV��� 49! A N� ^fd•� aL' TNG��C C;VVLTO�^� C�,njC y4 Y9wL.r �. rfiY .�tl OrN 'o 4: s�, 9q N� L L 4sC` M V Y � NCC 6 wL� -0A M-.2- y ppg0p, wyyy OO VC M l NE_L 'j V'O L`�pn V'R c- a, IL N C.N w:n Kx ° CN 3aa O HMs iN�U�t�t$i� YCa� Os G' 4 9. �C ^.yGO �{6�0e Cr OOP 'm L'Q.4BV } x r C C a G N Y 3y C Q 2^ C? P Y D! x q ZCpp i �.• x ep =� xC.�.G �Y xN N Oat. .1+�6� Vs 6e� 0.52 --. r O OI Y V uQLp^ N• Y 9 p 'x Y .O Cp C�` C =N `r C V x^ C V V Y! -0� O C C q^ i � P � rnV� 9r),t ^ � T py N H 'S 9=9 C�-0 ' Vy �V ytj tl1A Llr ACd ■An N e 9 ecc C Y.y i 0 V GL'C� •'1 V O, V V qY lVCI V��I/V �) uuC X �q tNC VN 9�i ���U.. xCM�'ai ■ Y tl� tV0 g'tl Ew�p *c 41 M x a ytl N y. S N� L. Y C tl �a`0 uC q t w q 1.vy7 � eY Y O C L E j rq cLp F aY6 6Lqr.V�m yVV eVN . �V' y� Om O.y .,x, ^�L GLOq `'C1.0 �. rL pp VM W C qCd y C LiC sV TL^YV'pYN q^ -I*- Q.x NGYC =I. L qer* k--S N V N V NC" _C lY�O Q V ¢y1 6x 4 V CmY.r 91 Ldw if16� �L` xV s^ LML +.� -Z CC Y.ty `.Y�C w .�Lpprr. NT�{J1�q itq N uO 4.CC � Qp Y SV 5 �C 19 524 n.H 'E I Nx� N wyY Wd C'VL K$NO Cg1rL.� i teN hV"6w �.V ie 909-5. Zak sq.� W.�Ly gq Y k C 'i W a �9 WO. I3�NV C nj rug EH 2 CaY° 91t1L iLp i bGC 0p_pa.6 V q I ■l a.V u ��C� .°.Y Y4'c+ L�rV.:.� • 0.o VTY� 3O VTY� VPC y�4�d CCli' O ~9 {{ L .p W oa O� S .9WC ¢ «ua: far° gaw v�� .yia« tlN geSj�pppppp`'«�g ceN m ^,i _ } CO •jA -..,Lt' IL Yw aYi s v y1 tn1 C +YY " Y Kq ^ C �V VOC guftj oil O� � ��Y■• �CM� �L �YAL n, 3GM nyv C6 Y RUS Y ► ° +� OfylG}.VpYY ^ Yp L$V � MIS � +i�� ®'Y> F.Gl 4�� H iVS Y �V{p1O9 GYPO V �N + P C tl 6p�+ 6+ VVVYYY yO Y' `O p Y pie >•.* V ifLC N� G GV O^tlp63V 0 �^ Cyy V4. V ' 'O A.r +9 q �C 6N iLIL Vl�. � + +F L)WL 67 PA 4.N �r QY.ip Nf G�V� n Y7 W lu 4 24 +y Y01 C enLu L u v V + 1 2A `p $p O�a c> OC4P y y q�N ®'O» „+ AyjyC Ln�E 99 Yp ►V i a$eY %a Ya _ +s. O. w.$ ^y L Y�Lp L O Cf i LOG $ • tlw� HY + �is,,. CG ■4 � V.NEC+ +O 0.p L V + y y 9Y �Y � �r + 6 O �C1i V r':��AA 0.0 0.0 b7�q.r Ya §{ J -Q P Y 2, L a - c L C o i H2 a /g�[.IU YNY YwL�C N O• PCi r � 0. q��� C r Y � N� C C ^.�.1Yw M 4. C �. YO. 610.1: is {Li a C CcgJ NO YN a a V H N N B a E M I L =mow G a+1L�� K 4 24 +y Y01 C �ypwp�1i L u v V + 1 2A `p $p O�a c> + ytl YHC „+ AyjyC Ln�E 99 Yp + 2310 ~ a$eY �e Ya ^y L Y�Lp L O Cf Ct �Y e� C C 0.M` o 6N Mt HY + �is,,. N IIO Mi! V.NEC+ +O 0.p 9J_Va ��y LQY 00 ^S C� �C1i V r':��AA 0.0 0.0 b7�q.r S6� ccL QY..Nw M +y Y01 C L u v V + CC L W E Ln�E PN cw ^y L Y�Lp a��a aY N IIO O p n^y YY t NLNN ^. NN"�p C� 3a; yGO.p. YL$ P1�1i 9`11 O^ a O QTe qcp C W. COC 4Y p LDU N' q^ O� ^ 5 a ro GGL Ne$ Y YY`9e LL qq�pM p.M°q^ ^GA roa n q4 C uw..6M Yq. L ..G. M' n CC cc CC q0 L+y� mZ �O E� V�V. ^yy OV'.« CIL ±�NY�� �7G rroet .x IL V° v2iij p.32 vmc o OCif.Va ;L YO y0 YLC V.iI�tY ±u ro L 4UO °V ~a9�.. O �{(GAY� y Ift QVGl1 CYtlWO Y y n■ O Y E17Y�� �..4.N .O tyV� YiC Vq �mm GL aY+i O p5 q � �.Y.M L U6�V >Rru.^ ff sM Y� L �':. � E".�''t 9 g s yLjy �^ U qY Y` Yo CNV C N O uVu V YpGY >'6 D. wN QE MQ ��CV q0 OCi� p�� � C aAa C� _� N,` e1,YY�•� t' ■vCw ?� 1G1 OI'^ `9 r. ^p •� M` C m:5 ^ w �T! O y 11, LO V' p. O . Y'! L Q. A w C = Cpy Q1> 0 N S3 H CH ro Clomp B {. CuC N°Uf LppL��� nP.wOVyyy ~90Cp C NOro OmNA �� U SO �)O y,YYygM 4C CN N GE 4i5 ^NA 9f..V A� p~q GY La U,eY, QU NCA ■Cp■ YY LN 'V LL°.0 D� 9:��Y.t °OY W V w= p�YY.C� C..i N�gTP �.. LC L� �^Qi�Yj V 1qAy. UO VI `7AG P6...i t WNro W4Li 0d (.7067 (M Yam qL) (WV Y� i w a u C r�YCOgG`�Y , 6 Y` G I 0 G C y 0 J. � 4 'r 4 ` Z > >�Y Y� NY Z• Q C ■� g'' ` p A^ e' U N p E' A N LAJ .N Nil t S, L Q VAN _ ...Nt q ON`. V •� � v C+.O�L GC O Y. V O Y.^ pee~ � A.CH Y N • WO ~. � NO ' +C Q�qp ppG IV• N N � p N �'4 � � � N. N ♦ � a � � °�` p4V O � `ro Ra u w0 V 60� ■a66_Yro • SO�> G Ez+q rill CAL"V Q * OO ppO O: Y >a O VVuu4 'D ^ M y 'fl: CI,Oro V� VCP�1V Gv Y. �r 4 Ir Q� Y Y +Q�76CyY� p q C R_ O p q y S 9 + ~ Y, ~ ~ p..♦� 1 L C y d N G n ^ ^ ^p Me. �_6 cNc CU � Y N YYij V ` O C 1 OW. w Cy QY i.GO M 84; iM �..NSLG vA. QTe qcp C W. COC 4Y p LDU N' q^ O� ^ 5 a ro GGL Ne$ Y YY`9e LL qq�pM p.M°q^ ^GA roa n q4 C uw..6M Yq. L ..G. M' n CC cc CC q0 L+y� mZ �O E� V�V. ^yy OV'.« CIL ±�NY�� �7G rroet .x IL V° v2iij p.32 vmc o OCif.Va ;L YO y0 YLC V.iI�tY ±u ro L 4UO °V ~a9�.. O �{(GAY� y Ift QVGl1 CYtlWO Y y n■ O Y E17Y�� �..4.N .O tyV� YiC Vq �mm GL aY+i O p5 q � �.Y.M L U6�V >Rru.^ ff sM Y� L �':. � E".�''t 9 g s yLjy �^ U qY Y` Yo CNV C N O uVu V YpGY >'6 D. wN QE MQ ��CV q0 OCi� p�� � C aAa C� _� N,` e1,YY�•� t' ■vCw ?� 1G1 OI'^ `9 r. ^p •� M` C m:5 ^ w �T! O y 11, LO V' p. O . Y'! L Q. A w C = Cpy Q1> 0 N S3 H CH ro Clomp B {. CuC N°Uf LppL��� nP.wOVyyy ~90Cp C NOro OmNA �� U SO �)O y,YYygM 4C CN N GE 4i5 ^NA 9f..V A� p~q GY La U,eY, QU NCA ■Cp■ YY LN 'V LL°.0 D� 9:��Y.t °OY W V w= p�YY.C� C..i N�gTP �.. LC L� �^Qi�Yj V 1qAy. UO VI `7AG P6...i t WNro W4Li 0d (.7067 (M Yam qL) (WV Y� i w a u C Poor noskiltv NU'= V rC�{. 4`ppL ■C i N t!{i1Y ar7C�t' w� Y�a p ' "L lips 4 n l Y �P N jai � �� yir1R � ���LUa PLU'1'L- SSW :Ys yt p 4 Y M C' yycEe �a Cpd'RC '''3 °�1a �/° t4 5 eVx'v opd YMTV MaN S, as Iz; pCVL= }G! -4 T qK Y1 �• . CC Yr '. �M uY Y�pI CMC �C CN a y Z%v .Gila Z; C LM :1 -1 .0 4w ■. :2 � OY� �Y Yap LL 2 al. '75-' � 1 L;._�Y.p Y �Lp c� �QY q ■a.. �N N -&b.2a N1. ^� �y p^ {y� „n Y ±Oa{a. C M4 =L O4 p d,pL •pp t�T14 32-W yd ,� L M(� a Y` y p 'a 6& ~ Y y V L 4 L a ~YdL I�.Tn O W 4 rY M Mat V Lp'wW iIb.�ugt ya�S E p sC A L y Vv . t�wo'SS: i� yl�aiiH o±3 Va K` ,pw .`1 ug'ipoCa 'OVO4E L p 4 1°^CL tip" �NY. W' K`AN cwt• b N M L Y cia 7�gcg o p 4 i'� LL VT w4� Ot0 LlIT'rY ^ N 4 . . *33 cm LaN N Y Ty0� C O N ai �' A Q 94 M! 3;y4.V Ar kt o -C,-6.z as � R b 1► A"Syg. p to p 9 fag �vN9 cYL y� Napa «Nyo -C &tt. 4N 4. Ct Wf VwA qpl KL U4 w tV pL r^� or 0.NV a Np.YiAr G.1 • jl Y W NI{ �. O 1 � 9 i Ol Ii KV. w. �'ca� r cia 7�gcg o p 4 i'� LL VT w4� Ot0 LlIT'rY 25 *33 LaN .9 Q 94 M! 3;y4.V Ar kt o -C,-6.z as � R b V' A"Syg. p {LT ®■C1 „�,, �vN9 cYL y� yytl��p3o �yy` «Nyo 7; N. W MLy4 44pCC0 Lrd U4 w tV pL r^� or 0.NV a Np.YiAr LGt 46W w W q4 p 4 i'� LL - 0 Ku CD • . 4I�Enyep�Y�L HE C^ VV d •qd L• u L` IV 0M CiGyla..L � CG� Y 4 C �'ltiN C L8i ' C LY�� •rta vrS V. NY's V u o +err LYp Z. CC: 'p)) • wYY Vppppn �O SON d 5 D qb Cp Asa -0 Cpv O� +yw wEo DOA qa LY'L Cw�. uD O pC � ` pC0 �I Y �V 4iw Yc 0LO YVw as q b N YES Y YLa ' r p V w ~ = - 0 NICZ.. MCC C^ VV O N u L` IV �. CG� N C O C �'ltiN C 1y0 O w p1pL �O L n LY�� •rta vrS V. NY's V M w. LYp M r CC: 'p)) • wYY Vppppn �O SON d CCyW� qb Cp Vt.O -0 Cpv pN.. ltd DOA o��� � � ` pC0 �I Y �V ■qM� �`� ..uu YVw CV wrt• r w ~ = G�W Y 0.2 938 7 Az E y f O 4 Y+4. ^ O Cwt{�. y u0 om^ i . a aT q ^�" r 6 L w r ^.v Y O 7 c Nii u. y Y O y S ~ciq IE° G C OwV000LS eNa Y DL.N L� aN[ 1. Y. L CJt L y �t,}� b $w ECG �.L C.�NLY. V. uL . M. O.d OMYC. y ¢yE RQ r& CV a~L o Yu6 GV C�OOY C « VNyO �. � Y N y e 1t Y• r� .& VVL V �. Y a u H' r M Y.wGY �, yy ;007 Cj i Y ..� l V d.� L N 'L CC LC YY G L {y Cbn '•_O?_a OpQ Y^ U G� pO V i C� f pp N L w.L �. NOD+Y Y. Y J.E w. =yV �p L L ' 4^ ��pps�'! Y O M O�1 ^ O `,C C N (p�Y L �. L rG «_ Y w 0 O N Y +O N Y q w c nL �LVV Ln�w SL na��Q w Y . aN ^N Y 9 N w w L pe M N N L O o1 y �ttV AN �Yw. V`•C 11 ey ^YY^ G _3� �, pbM vY^ C V� 'L+c ON. YO wYCC U.^.y OMd ogg qYp� o °ate L_ Y L�6i�. y. C �C } L _ wt Y~ ^ S YC. LNYP YLP N � K6 �a. hr11.i�C YQiL �N.p cd 33 RESOLUTION NO. dirk A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING C(*N.ISSION APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 88 -09 TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED PARK = SL7BA= AWNG FOOTHILL BOULEVARD FRON3 30 FEET TO 40 FEET A110 ALONG THE REAR PROPERTY LINE FROM 15 FEET TO 5 FEET FOR A RETAIL CENTER AND SERVICE STATION IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, 'LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND VINEYARD AVENUE - APN: 208 - 192 -06, A. Recitals. M Wheeler and Wheeler Architer }s has filed an application for the issuance of the Variance No. 88,-� as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as the application". (ii) On September 14, 1988, the planning Commission of the Ci'4y of Rancho Ctcamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. is NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of rtancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on September 14, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together with public test?Rony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and tiineyard Avenue vi th :a width of 151 feet and a depth of 183 feet and is presently undeveloped',, and (b) The property to the north and east is designated for commercial uses and is developed with commercial buildings. The property to the west is designated for commercial uses and is vacant. The property to the south is designated for residential uses and is developed with condominiums. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in pardrgraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: G) 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. VA 88 -09 - Wheeler .A Wheeler September 14, 1988 Page 2 f (a) That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. (b) That .there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property; involved or tc the intended use of the property. that do not apply generally to other properties ;in the same district. (c) That strict or literal interpretation and erforce!Knt; of the specified ragulation would deprive the, of privileges tq,)-,)Yed by the owners die siher properties in the same district. (d) That the ', granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified In the same district. (e) That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or weWare, or mate -ially injurious to properties or imprti dents in the vicinity. 4. Based upon ti:e findings bw conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approved the application. S. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THZS_la`TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CYiY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. WNiel, a rman ATTEST. •-9-3 u er, aecre ary PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 90. VA 88 -09 - Wheeler & Wheeler September 14, 1988' Page 3 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Jo hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and t; regularly introduce -1, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission: held on the 14th day of September, 1988, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: LOMMrSS1ONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: do CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ej r, STAFF REPORT LX DATE: September 14, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Brett Horner, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT IM CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88 -28 e eve opment of a 5,9 square foot re buildin g on 0.52 acres of land within an existing shopping center in the Commercial Foothi11 Specific Pia , located the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Malachite Avenue - APR: 208 -261- 20. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of building elevations, site plan, Ong coceptua gra plan, conceptual landscape plan, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant; Community Commercial South - Existing single family residence; Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre). Coast - Existing office building; Commercial /Office West - F;<Isting shopping center; Community Commercial C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Commercial North - Commercial South - Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) East - Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) West - Commercial D. Site Characteristics: The site is currently vacant (asphalt pav and lies Immed ateiy east of the a "isting Perry's Market shopping center. An alley and two single family homes atit the 'lot southern property line while to the north, a vacant exists. This unpaved lot was the farmer site of a service station. ITEM I PLANNING CQIN�11SSION STAFF:REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88-26 • PERRY September 14, 1988 Page 2 E. Parking Calculations: Umber of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio required Provided Proposed Buildiig 5,915 11250 24 31 Existing Center 39,010 2/260 156 150 TOTALS ISO 182 II. ANALYSIS: A. Back round. The , iarcels compri� ng Perry's Market shopping cen a, are ail currently owned b one entity. The applicant, however, retains a long term lev�,A )n four of the centerks seven parcels. These four parcels contain the existing buildings (Perry's Market and tenants) and the proposed retain building being reviewed with this application, but not the parking lot area ale^.; Foothill Boulevard. The lease allows the applicant the option to use the four properties (and to construct improvements on them) up until the year 2068. B. General., Presently, Perry's Market Center does not meet var rus Development Code and Foothill Specific Plan rrquir;ments. The center was built prior to the adoption of �chese require�iments, such as streetscape setbacks, landscaping coverage, parking lot designs and architectural guidelines. At their July 21, 1988 rreetitg, the Design Review Committee (McNiel, Slakesley, Coleman) stated that they world have recmnended the total upgrade of the center, based on this proposed expansion. However, the Committee understood the financial burden the upgrading would represent on one developer for a 5,000 square feet expansion of retail space. Zistead of requiring the applicant to upgrade the entire center, the Committee strongly encouraged the ,pplicarit to work with the legal property owner of the center as well as with the o*.ner of the small corner parcel in order to get the shopping center refurbished. Further, the Committee stated that the design of the new retail building should set the tone for future redevelopment of the entire center. 12 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88 -2d - PERRY September 14, 1988 Page 3 C. De�s�i nn__�R�e�view Committee: The Design Review ttee (Emerick, 1EcNie1 — u ew reviewed revised plans of the proposal, on August 4, 1988 and recommended approval subject to the following conditions: 1. A landscape planter area should be added under the tower at the northwest corner of the proposed retail building where the proposed retail building joins the existing retail building. 2. The elevation of the tower at the northwest corner of the proposed retail building should be revised to nw —h the appearance of the towev at the northeast corner of the proposed retail building in the area below the fascia. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the General Plan. The proj ill not be detrimental to adjacent, properties or cause significant environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use is in compliance with the Foothill Specific Plan, applicable provisions of the .Development Code and City Standards. IV. RECOMMENDATION; Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve on'nditional Use Permit 88-28 through adoption of the attached Resolution with conditions and issuance of a Negative eclaration. Re"ttfuily submitted, Brad r City P1 ner 8B :BN:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "uA - Building Elevations Resolution of Approval and Conditions - VICIN I-r--r 1 Aro 11 E ,- IT.L OF 3iTEDI: CUSP 88 -28 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: MAP PLANNING DTVISION 57-q EXHIf3IT. -.A- SCALE: ,+ = :! LI } \ 'K ` �. \,t /, ?u„� �tW►r1lo1pA4. YiC. • p t F- W'I�weI+VW�. rte, „y i S� BMW" -0]t lCW !Q 0 Ii sw`rei. Mi`i'K MR/Aa +. Of,.aH +,wo.. .o,s w•a "KG t1 Nrea� ra^� ,�s�fr.� �bsnjoa •d >G IYiMlak.. lOvY Im sryaYS rvl. ST CU wta: t t cns{q rt vo+o an,,w v m pi NORTH MW OF ITEM.- CUP 99.9Ve, C. A 3 A TIT : D r Ic c sir= ot ` PLANNING DIVISION � fw1c, M~Q, L-T — — row, *ZXX- sksA. H-ma 'ACMr W "r *COO AMR- I Note' Additional Plantings are required to meet cit standacl I Im NORTH CITY OF ITEM: - CLIP 88-28 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: AeE P_LA PLANNING DIVISION ,' I EXHIBIT: —.a— SCALE: none Awk RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88 -28, AND DESIGN REVIEW THEREOF, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 5,915 SQUARE FOOT RETAIL BUILDING WITHIN AN EXISTING SHOPPING CENTER LOCATET AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND MfiacF� *7 AVENUE IN THE COM JNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT - hPN: L38- 261 -20 A. Recitals. (i) Mr, Forrest Perry has filed an application for the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit No. 88 -28 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application". (ii) On the 14th of September, 1938, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucata2nga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that &c . (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds, that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Fart A, of this Resolution are tt•ue and correct. 2. eased upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission t1uring the above- referenced public hearing on September 14, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Malachite Avenue with a street frontage of 145 feet and is presently vacant; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is vacant, the property to the south of that site consists of a single family residence, the property to the east is an existing office building, and the property to the Nest is the existing Perry's Market Center. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission Alk during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph i and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: I �� RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88 -28 September 14, 1988 Page 2 • (a) That the proposed use is i ,,4 accord with the Gereral Plan, the objectives of thR aeveivpment Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That theg proposed uses together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of th2 applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. 4. This Commission hereby, finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, fl ,,her, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph jMh 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Condstions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Division; 1. A landscape planter area shall be added under the tower at the northwest corner of the proposed retail building where the proposed retail building joins the existing retail building. 2. The elevation of the tower at the northwest corner of the propose,{ retail building shall be revised to match the appearavice of the tower at the northeast corner of the prcposed retail building in the area below the fascia. Engineering Division: 1. The developer shall submit a request to vacate the existing alley adjacent to the south nroperty line prior to issuance of building permits. 2. In -lieu fees as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fees shall be calculated as follows: a) For utilities on the opposite side Qk.f Malo "Al to Avenue, the fee shall be one half the CTta� ado ted unit amount times the length of the project fron�age (145 feet); and G RESOLUTION NO. v -. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88 -28 September 14, 19E►$ - Page 3 b) For utilities on the opposite side of the alley adjacent to the south property line, the fee shall be one half the City adopted unit amount times the length from the center tf Malachite Avenue to the west project boundary. (145 feet). 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSIDN OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNI e , Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller; Secretary i I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning- Commission of the r City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of September, 1988, by the fallowing vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISIONERS ABSENT: C!,XIMISSIONERS: I 0.491nai Poor Quality N L� D5 N.�Y�M. 7Q(O�S N.G C ww CLO dtT YW. ACdari.' G q 7LU 4y.0' iy r� q�i< NCM oL � O CA S-O a' t9 a'i m °jp`vL arar,♦ `r�g�g,.`+ 8�� o «�q� pa.+ q��us°. Z �.. CS..N ��!$;q, °ivaadca ot{',�11 W 6 s:G L V L C V O N 3 1. 4 Y y 1y� yy V V tf.y�AC'N4�AL�CM ,G.O MFU +s°�it C� OQ YC t'i >•IO qY �. � N.�..CC '�.Y�U � 7r ~� ��J�LL io1 Yry��L� yOp��s 6L� ■Y1� bC9 gwrU �yN+a VQ.pp W. dyQ qC `MSy Y2c =GyV ° V d ACr+Ni�A 1`N 00 Yy Yb N ^O i4.q u� y i0if .1p��fOp S ^r'I e�,s.iQ YY Q._ K�SJ pp. L.rr {„YY ie {s �°!d4V� VOtN �N� 'COgC¢v¢���.� O.GWO��dO LC p� �N •. M .w �Q C.. .K$ ... r,L W y �^ NSlO ayaa�¢ ■ OCC yy y ` N�� _ iS . WNYLL`QY OCI O.YCLy �t6 a NON 9 y.O.A NYC$ c'�OO i0i�plK '�'R� aC�Uwp Av Q �1 . Yi MM O M t N y♦. y N C �+Ml .Qd. fls i u�n qyy wYCyy;� MyaCC..». pL�CyQ O° y yy V yV G C NY� OZ O Mgw'fY CCOYO ym- Casp :'a CC i�+ _ 1qy, r ee F Qq,q. N' Ky�i 2 Z� 4 O W H o � u q a � F K r 7 ° s 4 L m �! V 1 s. Em I] ink t1 V w riCr w a. i s.Y t♦�O LOgv Y ' w Qa V `,? Y .G N N i s O �C A q �w Y 1 s. Em I] ink t1 O.riginal'-poor. omilty E ME O V ? A �• Y o ` W YY�,� YLY. V.0 wa Dy `� 6a{� �Qy� wM ♦l y Na c.� c.'S ^G °� p w ju � S^q�irN. o© {`yJ•p tltl 1p' pn�o O,m 9.lLL AN.Ni tyi 7 C O AS -; Y B LO. LZ .-adz w as ■ 1� A L wV{NC w.t G L .yL N L'L O. MS 6 MO C� Y ��� y� 9 � Y GVwG pp.�N yNSY V'.SW Y C �� C qCC° 7v.Ow w Oawu MaGU GC$a ai'"1 Gam. � d °eo'a «tascai«j�� O N^ Y w M w wSa A y � CN^ T E SOSr°uoiu�� is w GYw wT Y Og V AL O �N~ Le 6w4,t�M � wW YCa *�1Y{i yn�Y °r. Y. �a� gqCYi� C YSO MMiii ajYr�,� KN Vw ®�V �.pN'.. Y9 NS 4t0 ./ 38 I I I E ME O V ? A �• Y o ` W YY�,� YLY. V.0 wa Dy `� 6a{� �Qy� wM ♦l y Na c.� c.'S ^G °� p w ju � S^q�irN. o© {`yJ•p tltl p pn�o O,m 9.lLL AN.Ni tyi R CY o a � A .-adz w as ■ 1� A L wV{NC w.t G L .yL N L'L O. MS 6 MO C� Y ��� y� 9 � Y G' G a� 9 q0 C Y C �� C qCC° ^gA N GN Yy�p,... ..iS � av N � Y�aa ers .Y . xg y EL Y,C SOSr°uoiu�� N� L w Y �I L... Y app Ya q< G L Yd Y o e H G Y A �• Y o g v SY �L ° YY�,� YLY. p . !CO ON�SN •' � a y �' c.� c.'S ^G °� p w ju � S^q�irN. o© {`yJ•p CMS p pn�o O,m 9.lLL AN.Ni tyi R ,yycy2j„ v �s�_ A .-adz w as ■ 1� A L wV{NC w.t G L .yL N L'L O. MS 6 MO C� Y ��� y� 9 � Y yV Y W G a� 9 y■■ Ls °`��a C qCC° ^gA N GN Yy�p,... c��« qN Y�aa ers °� xg W�a�''S"M OI EL Y,C SOSr°uoiu�� s��N ^Ga ac°�,g Le yCSwGy' Y �Y�, w i• °r. Y. �a� O.0 a�ii C 01 �.pN'.. Y9 38 A lu C y CO ?233 b a�a Q4ty?p^ ■y LC C �C Ny. — ��yii C V jVrSLd Y tl 7 aOS 4�i�Y'Yt V,q OSfJAYrD tiI V I I I I I_r — • r w yyr-iC O O ` wYC Y N L SY �L ° YY�,� YLY. p . !CO ON�SN Lp y. 4 ua�� EllN C V }�I,MY .iCi � q�V yAyS` O Y {CV VC Lp f _wA L �„KVYO wQG Y C Nw�YL Y M CtY=t IN ^°° L G pn�o O,m 9.lLL AN.Ni tyi eMe,1 S y M �w ■■� N �''4 A `` OMO -4 a�d+ stV r$pc Hp�► iCf L wL•• M' ~G`L 1�OC Lp��� S:Y. °`��a .w.r €�yy�`y qCC° ^gA N GN Yy�p,... c��« qN Y�aa ers °� W�a�''S"M OI EL Y,C �yr wY y�fi y�YQO�� �; uOu OIp +�1yy4 r_�° �lNC YG� L$LL GP qL cyw.^CQ`�•ppL_ 7 w�L O VMM N. NS p'G ^. N Cii CL 38 A EC�Ca 94.0 a�a Q4ty?p^ ■y LC M_S ND �C Ny. — ��yii C V jVrSLd Y tl 7 aOS 4�i�Y'Yt V,q OSfJAYrD Q-7 ap L Y C CyyC {CdV� npn, a. w tj -c- ,.. C'1 aL� w i C.aN N 4CL`1 C Y C zO O C =q Yw{I a YO "b V V Y i• a ;; iQ LLyi.0 i V CiN Y L ^w � M 4 O$! VY M --Z y,x- 1 S C O. H La s JO�.y a s.- H C R Y L, Ow: eL L I N 8 Q•i d Orlo''nal Poor Camw VY.NL *.a .Yi f �nuiq�u�ao. «�..sp c LLe C� ^ a4 , �N¢C C1� >OC °14 N ~C. i >O^ y aC �N q ^N nYOOQ ^AOVSi y ^1 �I.LwI }• � NwMO .+L C°Oy }�1y ��Td OV N.Y • �L OO VNYtl•�N Y'O�T� q Cu�G GCCq QIN V� 9HLLu�. U Y Y'NNVG.CTY �G° VsJi. vAiM vj ^ C. G ^yY LEN Ly �Nq ^ ^• YV. aN OO�N ^ Y U' V oN 9^ p^ q y N� 6p Cr °L =yWyN�YPO ^ aN_ y °CN L . -• +A.� yOEI� I ,Ct �Np NYV y ^L.�MAEYYyj 'E NNC YC4 C L ^L(((qG��� a 9 6�p� rr4 �. V 6 Y P O N E O N 0 d N b N C C„ zg N «? Cy V.G O V^ 'L�.✓ � i � 66� ^ 1Rd a�v; CM.^ �C L I V S+e C Np � iWW' O.L 111 YC� NLO�C� YtlI�N �. N O vw� d�•4.0 BV1 �ey O^ C^ '°hi^t' A,b Rtl NYNLtiN L ,.,G N WE ^CNCD. AL GMNfGP• it y ygj'~� NO 4C D�yYN 6~1 ��.qG �N L �w ssM LY Nµ � O L O LL, pL�°U CCO,�CC�yL °'G++G• �P�a �j C C O ,yT �poM L CY GY �� TOY YNY EE. •�OCL.L EICLONY 6 N_;' G. qY �Iw.�Y N •r. N,,N KN ^� 6N 1100 F•NC <N d IY :�OV O.N M w V > i 00 C G I_cY }� Old i G Y 'v rte. E A Y O C1�~^ b !J t ;LYa Y W 0 6 Y CY'N� NiiY M A Y A � M^ G <Nd L 33� °. gyV �tl0 e1N d C V Y BN�a N v ^N• �V V« V M AQ w�C G Lsy irk NNH L N _C L � I O NO.•O.. —a—Oyy C V^yy y�.GC.1 -- — c c ' C C y 4 c Y+sen Mw ®tl�w A'V L om N via- -5. �. •wa Y 6i r♦ M L M d^ G C V G Q 0 L y M M N wri O ' "0 0 •r 4^ 'o.,�vue oN V9s.C� • pI� O� x =MC`N` As Mtl V �� YYG Vtl M� N�a N� vNYA CC EY Y IN VY 7 f d V.rY•w, ° N° °N � o V L :0 V N YY CyyG D V° °~ O O V IL � CgpI LMEN n ° �. Y 0 V �t0C �Y. is N A A� ^N. Piz ^ y1p rO ,Y. w. ~7Cj Vy �` Z.V. atL QYp aae 0. NCwy C. `` « C l Ytl_s auw■� O�'�C Ltl/ , LO_ N'Oq � Yw C�IyI�Y KMpa ■wi�0 -. ^L y L V yI g�C1 •r «�V x09 nN •AMA �' a OL}VIw y`O NNF�j M LLV��Y9 g w V > i 00 C G I_cY }� Old i G Y 'v rte. E A Y O C1�~^ b !J t ;LYa Y W 0 6 Y CY'N� NiiY M A Y A � M^ G <Nd L 33� °. gyV �tl0 e1N d C V Y BN�a N v ^N• �V V« V M AQ w�C G Lsy irk NNH L N _C L � I O NO.•O.. —a—Oyy C V^yy y�.GC.1 -- — c c ' C C y 4 c Y+sen Mw ®tl�w A'V L om N tl 4 -,�5� r�yfr 'e' «ah u=oa Q�� a.-zt a... mv. Lyt VyC= Cc9CG �7p i !au �C l 9 N • O F V ^ O gig N A N� � � tL .� N V ENO CSC it t�.iL , ~ ®2 Uf pYCLV qM Y `w «La �VC �. m 'L3 CN V'��W V$iG�y { ■C¢� Y -$Om t4N WYO W 4' L Ll p.. a� V YY �VM LN g �V � W AR.-.t �L .t $_if6• .°.dN UZ v�� s2 n Ynou .. Cn L+c "v't yy pOS «L.^ L3lY Cagi m. xi aa` eab CHI ls�r'" $u u _L N�f di g� pIL W �C 4w Y`VY.Y �p'YC V' .G. ��► aa+ ha O.p4 O YY V r�, Oti V O C '20i L JVii'aL � -�'tj � p y «...^'v�° �a�$a I—A CC aa 4 sc; f {�jj��,E V 'e�^^'q 90{01•. LRL a± ^ >pS Q yl+.tv yi1►.ry -.6Y M ov Nf Yy Y� C pe ^Q 11 -12 a wVCP! Vu {3 pCLL +�0 L NOVi Q�6�6 a9 ipp'i Y G �su + o 8 gA 4&- yyGU. a O N L . N.O 'e +v i+w °sis 1 Ak'9 F'W Ci p,p W s1es OYK N GYa T j f' �!/ tp f•� G y . m1= Vai K sOI�� W11 CwL ri ♦l +.0 DEC tat YV` d ', �Yf Y s YL W ur C z LV�. NO L ' OIgY C'�! C ■y C aCL H y YAM yY,� M �y�� VX 'NO t74 t: MV HP + 44 CV� Y�fi ~ nss'y � N{�`. ��M 1 VwCO YQw ^N7Y i O y�� tay j. AN T O +O E^ �J!i y? y"u +efws ++ $i4 °Sc sEQ$ Is..- °Y ' >4` YL mOi > uu a Ste` Zi Ga L cc L • CYy + Mr��O c Y. ^ s ... Lycy o�CN Rv CO +Y tN'C �Yy upp Y y C �1 AyL >r:.Y ' Y r1,F� L q - ■,� 01 Y. y +yw $aa L O T L G! \ V Q u N M G p� M 4 M �p Li N'f%'T yLV Q NN W I -Olt �. �{iA1 � M G. ^ YL N • N Y+ v a � t V. � y - � w'.. � G a � `.Y u w � V O 1 {y� !J lug �C ONP tyw� w py �8 ■y {. pr, ca U C O w W 11 L 01a boo POD °drocao. ' w C O� F:54 b O V yy a diq ■O W. O 00� N e {� � o �Nn NLb C p�^ p 6■ 9 V M Y fo L N L Y '^y C L L° ab a L A } V MM L e a ,,. y� iog u� ° ■ ^QQ■'�o UNC069 "VM �L •1� S .sue �Y6 O O O O k C -a rY ywC tuVt Y A��V Q'C SwO QQ Gp HE i� V 0 . �VVN O u Yy i N �, U .. rV L�1��6E99 V iO YO.t^ U VOO i� LL ^6 4�qqV MZ jj . w U� CQ V ariaL 7 LN E`� Opp «.. GSgp ZZ =�G66 yC �S�d LV `CNY C.f•..j wY• j �p a Yyv. Gy.L°.� C` 30A 1�wNO. Wb V n CC ■ry �NNN v O ii` Y �`V`� N vGV Ou G1 n 01 : CS C�+I^ L8 E�pG OVCy' a0 Y� LV VQY C r6a �i�� �� Y ^cOc� Va�J^ AjCCA °. GV Y �Q•y� 'AYG^ gyp YwY�MY •.�' C UO.Z AASs® OYM �LYpr' 7p1 Y� Y ^0^' Yp �S q$ X yn Q.l G~tl� �? oY �° a C � �Mtl 'ce$r1 �Y YC Y.V. 0y �.� MYM C � Lw. `f'4V aMxS ds CG ^pp1� O {O�dru� YVY Y4V9 L„" Gp Y Zw V^ N Q'� yL LL^. rAC pp N.Yy IKity o -31 A � yy M A 'NY�r 4 e Np Y " - b p Vy QSS N 8-; `` N L V O A It- ii GOYa• DC �• o�mz? C6 7 �MI � YM 83^�LC Mld. N w.��CCa air' to 7 ^CO± wY3pY wl Yvvy L O ti `N N.�g! 1y >.• M 01Y GV w Olw 7 Ol RI,f25 a� �� LL•• �w O �� v N YY�YV� V L {s +yI A ��.•+ Yy�y >� Na °YEN µC 6V nA qAw �..N +CLVi pV LyS9C46Y �p�r +N �iYV Nw .Qy�C6ya gT�A 4N A06TB rd� A! YO Cry LCLw 6� nw 4 U L 1 NI 14 �I� U3 D 7.. rf� 11 L oar Jay 11 E �oor qc o3� ei wVt L4 Y�Y y Kag c o2 '�ii,s 3 Lpp 1w 4� & , L � dyy ' U yyNe �QL1 w(1 r a. .�f1.�py -0 ..M � byMN `+�Ot . wt �+KV M B N O w,r dw yL" $Y» q` a Nay I�rxy o y a'$ Y C S Q yQ 'ZI V. f. CrgRA 4%� a4 V ■kk—o I tk �� +•N� Lam. w� �'yd $=` NCI A`i a1. ��y �1 S ii. �+;q vN iw CMNN wy wY'YZI~ �D..'rS at3K N.� �W •�~ KLy RVr{ 4yyN YC El ey.� 4 N al 8 yM Y~ K A � )f w I' S� � V G4� 2Z N r Y L e Y N uu� d Y 4Y d V G w a ,fpY aa� a' w py$ M Y LI �w M d �Z w e� N ^ � d Ug N�� '� Y C p N� ■NR �� �' � yiiiii LC. M CC 4 r tlrQ 8� � N� ~L,K Aii L=i E SIT ' p Z' Ntl 4 w # D y� rtp � OF L < b y�� YYL'• y s p. `.'N N.a.c RyC�w p• N t =m Y �c 4 Few'. iM i N s7O� 4 0 44M1� 3v iZ, ,q-. L N �w nw L'15 w . uw MF s•wr a"�++ Y T Ate~ g„q yr. 6 Ra 466' w Y Sr p 1^ "�I 4 L$L' N� Tx b w 7! f R y p ayn . M L w a V H usa 1 I p Z' Ntl 4 w # D y� rtp � OF L < b y�� YYL'• y s p. `.'N N.a.c RyC�w p• N t =m Y �c 4 Few'. iM i N s7O� 4 0 44M1� 3v iZ, ,q-. L N �w nw L'15 w . uw MF s•wr a"�++ Y T Ate~ g„q yr. 6 Ra 466' w Y Sr p 1^ "�I 4 L$L' N� Tx b w 7! f R y p ayn . M L w a V H usa 1 I 0 x v Lsi 9 sv �o L Y 6 C s % ca a oa.� v �slS N.y s �xj r C A • Afi 6 C lJC —21 s A s V td O oar. a '4 � ^yam N O L O N L CC yyL K N O 2 O M W w w Cis h L C w J L Lucr+ CV iYl ML WRRy wur'c4i V K V^ c L aY VSO io ag »g n a 6 N L w Y M p . yw M' A � O� N L 4 i Y9. nL � L d0 4u Ors° M d i O d p Y a 9YY L M � N N LL KW M N�YW� iJ ^V` ! �wpNS iL {{�� C t00° - ` O N Ir KW Or <d �I al nl ml 0 \13 Vol wf.i Y j c w s % ca a N.y s �xj r _K • Afi 6 C s A s td O oar. nV '4 � ^yam ■ rs pa V W w N3 w C{pL�, 1C M 4 O pti7A Y^ O m xs y� nn ��yy N +Qtu aaC pp 4ji.itl ai V �'NA L p{s L' 3.. a a3 0 Sri y VN YpgCa V �} r a a -17 I 1 ' E 1 LA ai r Qvr Y +nu Afi A JOY td O oar. nV '4 � ^yam ■ L, pa V N3 w C{pL�, 1C M 4 O pti7A Y^ O m ��yy N +Qtu aaC pp 4ji.itl ai 2qw r �'NA I 1 ' E 1 LA DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT:. -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCA :x;ONr A STAFF REPORT September 14, 1988 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Tom Grahn, Assistant manner - MUNIC35umi GHb �wquest to building in the of the Foothill Foothill Boulevar uleva: specific Plan, located at 9544 - APN: 208 - 151 -14, 15 and 16. 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Pe rite-°: Review ^ ' 4 Condit'onal Use Permit i appTT'ta on f5i a`childrallIs day core; program. B. Surrounding land Use and Zoning: North - Education V41- united, Residential, Mixed UsL "outh FiPst Trust Bare= Arco AM -PM Commemial Office East - Vineyard National Bank; Comaunity C -3mmarcial West Shell Service Station; Community Commercial C. General Plan Designations° Project 'Yte - Commercial North Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) South - Commercial East - Commercial West - Commercial D. Site Characteristic -.: The proposed use is located within an existiW commerc a center. There are two building on the site. Wendy 's Restaurant occupies one building. he other- building contains seven tenant suites, two of which are occupied by New Directions, one is occupied by Moon Accupressu�e. The four remaining suites are currently vacant, Montessori's proposal will occupy two of these suites. ITEK J R wPLANNING COK41SSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88 -34 - MONTESSO111 September 14, 1988 Page 2 E. Parking Calculations: Number c; Number of Type Square p4rkin- Spares Spaces. of Use 22!i22e Ratin Required Provided Wendy's 2,336 23(a) 23 Moon Accupressure 1,400 1/250 6 6 New Directions 2,900 1/5 students 2(b) 10 1/1 faculity 8 Montessori 4,000 1/5 students 11 12 1/1 faculity 7 Vacant Tenant Suites 3,100 1/250 12 12 TOTAL W 'Q'T(c) (a) To clarify any discrepancy from current code requirements, this parking total reflects. what was required at the time of pr-iject approval. (b) The students in the 4ew OfiI-ections program do not drive to tae center, they are bussed in 04o vans and only utilize two of tiie originally required five parkit- spaces. (c) A total of 69 parking spaces will be available after removal of a portion of the Mantescari playground. mere are 63 spaces currently available. F. Appli -.able Regulations: The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan conditionally o�Ty permits day care centers within the Conmwnity CommeMcial District of Subarea 3. II. ANALYSIS: A. Background: A "Montessori Academy" pre -s: :hool was in operation �a �cTiMe- location for several years until June 1988 when they i moved to a r.^w location. The new 7pplicant desires to open a pre- scl;ool program for up to 55 children, ages 2 1/2 to 5 years. - { B. General: Two issues need to be addressed in this proposal; oese 'are the avai?;bility of parking and compatibility with adjacent ases. Neiidy's Plaza was developed with a total of eighty parking spaaces; howevmr, due to the construction of the playground for previous Montessori Academy, only sixty-three parking spaces are currently available. The app''icant is proposing to PLANNING COM rSSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88.34 - MONTESSORI September 14,, 1988 Page 3 reduce the site of the playground and increase perking by five spaces which will provide a total of sixty -eight parkin spaces. A typical cowre ercial tenant leasing 4,000 square feet and parked at a ratio of 1/'250 would require sixteen parking spaces, however, only twelve sp_ces are Currently available. With the addition of Five spaces, a total of seventeen spaces will be avai3able for thi3 suite. The day care program requiremants are one parking, space for each five students, plus one for each staff member. Based on this parking ratio, a total of eighteen parking spaces t,re required. Although there is a discrepancy between the number of spaces required versus the number of spaces provided, tie conflict may only arise during the drop - off 'end pick -up, of students. It is not anticipated that there will be a circulation coolict with Wcndy's Restaurant as their peak Flours are 11 :00 AM to 2:00 PJ and 4:CO V14 to 7:00 PM, The peak 'hours of drop- offrock -up for the Montessori Chi id Enrichment Center are 8 :30 AiY to 9:00 AM and 2:00 PM to 2:30 PM. The second area of concern is the compatibility with adjacent uses. A previous approval New directions, CUP 87 -40) raised concern for potential conflicts between the two establishments (see attached Planning Commission :" 'lutes from May 11, 1988). New Directions provides instruction to developmentally disabled persons age 18 -to 55, Montessori provides instruction to children 2 1O2 to 5 years of age. Because of previous CemmiS.Sion =.,cern over possible harmful interaction between the two establishments, staff will continue to research whether problem, have occured and provide information concerning any states interaction. The, tNere were an©acconflictserbetween the Directions previous Montessori and .Flew Directions, and they look forward to wc:7king closely with the new Montessori School (Exhibit 11B3), C. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been � comp I e e y e appllcSft. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist dnd has found no significant impacts on the environment as a result of this project, III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order to approve the Conditional Use e_m , e o,�n ss on would need to make the following findings, 1. That the proposed use is in accordance with the General Plan, 1 the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Pian Subarea in which the site is located. KV i PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT COWDITIONAL USE PERMIT 8$-34 - MONTCSSORI September 14, 1988 Page 4 2. That the proposed use wi1T: not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfaren or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with etch of the applicable provisions of the Foothill Boulevard 'Specific Plan. IV. CORRESPONDENCY: This it.m has been advertised as a public hearing n e ar y--Re ort newspaper, the propertw .posted, and notices senf o, 57--p-ropey owners within Subareh.;3 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission hold a public h ear ng en this ite�ii. If, after considering public comments, the .revired findings can be made, adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval and issuance of i Negative Declaration would be appropriate. K lesolution of Denial has also been included should the Commission not be able to justify the required findings. QResfullyv s tte y annex BB:TG:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant Exhibit "P" - ,Letter from New Directions Exhibit "C" Location Map Exhibit "D" - Site Plan Exhibit "E" - Floor Plan Planning Commission Minutes of May 11, 198 Resolution of Approval Resolution of Denial July 26, 1988 Dear City Board Members, It is our intention to establish a business at 9544 Foothill Blvd., Rancho Cucamonga. The purpose of this business shall be to open a Montessori Pre- school, We W:41-be accepting children 2-� to r5 years of age. Our hours or operatior'will be from 6 :30 AM to 6:00 PM, Monday through Friday. We plan on having seven employees on the largest shift of operation. Our maximum capacity will be approximately fifty five children. It is our understanding that a Montessori Pre- s -thool was in operation at the above address for over six years until June 1988.. They were known as the "Montessori Academy ". They have just recently moved their school to.a new location, however, we were informed by. the city planner that we would not be able to renew the conditional use per- mit used by that school because it expired when they moved. Therefore, we are applying For a new conditional use permit for the same purpose that this location was used fbc previously. Respectfully, f � V Elsie Garcia L` New Directions P.O. BOX 7000 - 327 RAlICHO CA. 91701 (CW: 5 112 August 16, 1988 Ms. Elsie Garcia Montessori Child Enrichment Center I am writing in response to your request concerning the relation - ship between New Directions, Inca (located at 9550 - 52 Foothill Blvd. - Rancho Cucamonga, CA.) and the previous Montessori Center. I feel that the relationship between the two agencies was extx'emely well. The clients and staff from our program respected the Montess- ori program and did not infringe upon them or even enter into the gate which separated the two agencies. It is my opinion that when two agencies are professionally managed there is no reason the two cannot be compatible. I perceive no conflict between the two facilizies and do believe that we can both occupy adjacent sites without difficulty. New Directions looks forward to working closely with your agency in an effort to facillitate a workable relationship and if we can assist you in any way, please do not hesitate to let us know.' t sincerely Alma Derritt Executive Director AD/ft 4 t NORTH Ty OF ITEW __P �4 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: -�L& O�4 MAP ,PLANNING DIVISION o�,Q EXHIRIT :� SCALE: ��•r�._�� 9m MU i - Dew d .`�U 7tO �: PJk'1f7 •S' r•.1 Qrp 0iiy1A 1 — /^� �q1 .'t 1 V CAI. Cif.' J J a rAfICC fy" cc ate v1 17 1 i _ rr y Rijn ��fl LIAR: MR LEGENO ORYICR R?INDQYTIAL ® LOT! OQIOQITY RQAI?:TITIAL L0r•011OI11II II991011RTIA4 rm-57 .IIQQD UQQ' O OTYICt. CO COMMQRCLIVQFFICQ MR MlDWM RQAIbY11171AL INDUATRUL tlQD1un."IQ i RQOIDQNTIAL COMMQ7ICIAL LI LIONT IRDU�pg1At COYYQgCIK iC IliQCiAL COYML..... �DlIM QOTK/TY FCCJ COMMUNITY COMMQRCIAL. FO-4-4 RQDIORAL RELATED COM �O IWQLIC KItCIAL _I MA/TCR PLAM ARCA NORTH Ty OF ITEW __P �4 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: -�L& O�4 MAP ,PLANNING DIVISION o�,Q EXHIRIT :� SCALE: ��•r�._�� MorMf�I �u� ia1�f { ! urDrf... v 15 New 11 FOOTHILL SOULEVARD NORTH CITY OF ITEM. RANCHO CUC AMONGA TITLE: VMS, PLANNING DIVISION �- EXHIBIT: " V' j erg` -- SCALE. ,� FLOOP- PLA iJ NORTH i&lTNYco,,Z-o CUCAMONGA 6up 4 0 '*4 PLANNING DIVISION TITLE: rW4 EXHIBIT: SCALE:i!llo. r zoo 4 0 Area LIZ . Chan qin� q 7 �e0rn v,�strocarns Y. L`ABt1Lts j� L'1:stt�Qts3S gscx , , �caaivi Afe X03 qsq. �. FOY Gl.QS5YOQ+rysS �Q3 I REttCg's n a ht _ EKtt 1/3 FLOOP- PLA iJ NORTH i&lTNYco,,Z-o CUCAMONGA 6up 4 0 '*4 PLANNING DIVISION TITLE: rW4 EXHIBIT: SCALE:i!llo. L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, Ai ND CONDITIONAL. USE PERMIT 87 -40 - D - request to esf:ab -. EA %- TT 2900 square feet w i thin \� Y program n a ease space p Community Commercial Distric (Subarea 3),mlocat d at 9550 and 9652 Foothill Boulevard - APN 208 - 15.715. Tom Gratin, Assistant Planner, presented the staff reporit. ' Chairman McNiel Opened the public hearing,. Alma Derritt, applicant, gave an overview of the request. She explained the program and clarified that the program deals mainly with adults who are developmentally disabled. Chairman McNiel if the clientele of the program would pose a threat to the adjacent businesses, Montessori School in particular. Ms. Derritt explained that the criteria for entrance to the program would not permit people who were of danger to themselves or others. There were no further cpmments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Commissioner s'merick supported the request and stated it is a valuable community service. As long as criteria establishes that the people are not a threat it would address his concerns. Commissioner Chitiea was concerned with passible corifrontAtion between the adults attending this program and the preschool children attending Montessori School, if this center was or000sed for another ' tation, she would welcome it; rowever, at this location with Montessot -, Sc, of in operation she could not support it. Chairman NcNit pointed out that Montessori School i5 completely enclosed. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that the type of service certainly neeeid and welcome in the City. His concern ropo with the proximity to Montessori School and could on the location. not support the request based Mr. Gratin advised that he .had cWacted Montessori School_ and was informed that they intCd to relocate to another site as soon as thirty days or as late as the end of August. Commissioner Tolstoy asked when this facility intends to open.. Ms. Derritt stated that she would be ready to open upon approval by the Planning Commission. Planning Commission Minutes _ "' May 11, 1988 11 Commissioner Blakeslay did not feel that the attending this center would pose an raa± people who would be than the public at large. Therefore, he rupportedtthe use�essori School Mr. Buller advised that, as with any Conditip1al Use Permit, should a situation arise the permit is revokable. Commissioner Chitiea concurred that the type of ,ervice this facility will provide As needed in the City. She was concerned with the time overlap created with the opening of this ' c1lity and the relocating of Montessori. Motion: Moved by Resolution approving Environme c ptaiAssessment andkCondtional UsePPermit 87 -40. Motion carried by the fallowing vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK, BLAK ,.EY, MCNIEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIcA, TOLSTOY ABSENT: ' COMMISSIONERS: NONE' - carried Commissioners Chitiea and Tolstoy th Muntessc,i School c was based not on the use, but on the loatianrbeing adjacent t attagthe J. ENVIRONN'71TAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL KAP 11410 - CARNEY- THEODOROU - A Specific o il. 6 acres o an nto 6 pares s in the In ustrial Specir "ic Plan and the Haven Avenue Overiay District, located at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Arrow Route - APN 209- 142 -17. Q. ENVIRp FAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -04 CARNEY- de've opment o an acre n ustr a Park Master Ph an cc sisting of 8 buildings totaling 165,700 square feet R ter Industrial Park. and Haven Avenue Overlay District, located at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Arrow Route - APN 209- 14 2-17. Betty Miller, Assistant Civil Engineer, presented the Parcel Map staff report. Staff recommended that condition 8 (d) include the following amendment: However, if the Arrow P.oute Improvements are -existing fr:;ting the not apart parcel the Arrow Route improvements shall be extends" across parcel 3 frontage as well as across parcel 4. Chris,Westman, Assistant Planner, presented the Development Review staff rep<irt. CcmNlissioner Chitiea was concerned with the access and ho!d it would work with the circulation. plan in terms of safety. Shy asked far a clarification. Planning Cr.Y�,,qissinr- Minutes -13- .: May 11, 1988 RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDi IONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88 -34 FOR THE MONTESSORI (CHILD ENRICHMENT CENTER OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LOCATED IN THE AT 9544 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD IN THE COMMUNITY C"Q:RCIAL DISTRICT - APN: 08- 151 -14, i5, 16. A. Recitals, (i) Montessori Child Enrichment Center of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an . plication for the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit No. 88 -34 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this'Resolut,on, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the appl i cati oar (ii) On the 14th of September, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing or, the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites �o the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in he Re ^..tats, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on September !A 1998, including, Written and oral stafF reports, together with pubT testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as fallows: Foothill Boulevard within application developed c €nterop onsi ti gteof Wendy's Restaurant and seven tenant suites; and (b) The applicant proposes to operate a children`s da,t program Monday through -cridayr from 6:30 AM to 6 PM, 3. Bas;A upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced pdb:•!c hearing and upon the s,iewific findings of facts set forth tin paragrap� I and 2 above, this Commisstan hoi -eby finds and concludes as h ;ows: �a) That the proposed use is ?n accord wish the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. Jt QL PLANNING "OtISSION RESOLUTION CONDITIONA(. USE PERMIT 88 -34 - MONIESSORI September 14, 1988 P.ge 2 (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or walfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (cl That the proposed use complies with each oe the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. been reviewed This d considered in complia ce and with the, CaliforniahEnvir mental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 11 S. Based upon the findings :d conclusions set ft 'th in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the appV ation subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division Alk (1) Any modification, expansion, or other change In operation will require 3 revision to the Conditional Use Permit. (2) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Foothill Boulevard Specifir. Plan all other City Ordinances. (3) If the operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or operations, or If surrounding businesses /uses cause adverse effects upon the preschoo', the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for the consideration and possible termination of the use. (4) Occupancy of the facility shall not cc zance until such time as all Uniform Suu iding code and State Fire Marshall's regulations have b,,en complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Foothill Fire Protection DI-strict ?:,d 9uilding and Safety Division to ShOw compliar,se. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. (S) Any signage; proposed for the facility shall be designed inn conformance with the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance, ary Uniform -ign Program for -�3 E 0 'LA.144ING COMMISSION RE50L►3TION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88-34 - MONTESSORI September 14, 19P8 Page 3 the complex, and shall require review and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation. (6) This Conditional Use Permit; is approved for a makimu.,r of seven employees and fifty -five stidents. Engineering Division (1) The develc'ser shall dedicate 10 feet of additional Yight -of -way on Foothill Brulevard (APN: 208--51-14, 15 and 16) to provide an ultimaftt str 4t width of 60 feet a$ measured from the ceK�,rline. 6. The Secretary to this Cornission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF SEPTW -BER, 1988. PLANNING COMMIc ;ON OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. e , chairman . ., TEST: ra u .er, secretary ` I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolutioa was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Punning Commission; of the City of Rar-ho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the, Planning Commission held on the 14th day of September, 1988, by tie following vote-ft-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS; NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ,I RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCWONGA PLAk';iNG 'COMMISSION DENYING CONDITTONAL USE PERMIT NO. 58 -34 FOR THE MONTESSORI CHILD t,'RICMENT .CENTER OF RANCHO r.Ut V40NGA LOCATED AT 95544 FCli:+THILL BOULEVARD IN THE CG;4UNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT - APN: 208 - 151.14, 15, 16. A. Recitals. filed ar> applicationefor the Child sseancejoi� the Conditional RlisehPe i it No 88-34 as described in the title OA; this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subjet., Conditional Use Permit request: is referred to as "the application". (ii) On the 14th of September, 1988, the Plannir;y Coumission of the City .f Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the app.rcation and con:luded said hearint, on that date, (iii` All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby sound, determined and resolved by the Planning Cormission of the City of Rancho Gucamonpa as follows: I. This Cow ;ssion hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and :%rrect. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Couviission during the above - referenced public hearing on Septe-' r 14, 1988, It-_iuding written and oral $gaff reports, together with pcy7ic testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 9544 Foothill Boulevard; and (b) The applicant is proposing a children's day program for a total of fifty -five students and seven employees; and _ (c) The subiect property we' developed to allow for commercial tenants and parked accordingly. This tenant suite has sixteen parking spaces available -r and (d) die Develcpmen rx.ie requires a parking ratio of ane parking space for each five students anal one parking space for each eh.M ogee, based on that ratio e+ghteen parking spaces are required, creating a deficiency of two parking spaces; a „d RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88-34 September 14, 1960 Page 2 EXI te) There is concern over potential conflicts aetween existing tenants and the proposed use. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set firth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is not in ac ord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Codo, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the iicirity. (r.) That the proposed use does not yomply each of the applicable provisions of the Da anent Lode. 4. Yiis Coranission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance r:ith the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. 5. t-ased upon the findings and conclusions set forib in paragraph 1, 2 And 3 above, this Commission hereby danies the application subject to each and every conditiun sc t f-4r th heo ov and in the attac'Ned SWidard Conditions attached hereto anG ',rcorpt`r,,,ed herein by this reference. 6. The Secr ,2tary to this Commission shall certify to the dootion of this Pesolution. t APPROVED ANO ADOPTED THIS 14TH GAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1988. PLANNING COMMIS 10N OF T: :E CITY OF RAYCHO CUCWONGpi BY :. Larry T. cRt. AiTEST': 3rad BfflTer. ecre d r ti J-W RESOLUTION NO. CO "DITIONAL USE PERMIT 88-34 SOAEMber 14, 1788 Page 3 1, Brach Buller, Secretary of the Planning .Cormission of the City of gancr�r� Cucam^r,gZ, do hereby certify that tfte foregoing }esaiutian was duly ant regularly iri.4"duted, passed, and adopted by the Manning Ct ►;SStorn of the t'ity of Rancho Cucamo►tgtt, at a regular muting of the Planning r +ssiat} held un 'i^e 14th day ti�f reptember, 19$$, by tha following vote -to -spit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS.: NOES: C ISSIONERSz ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS. :FJI i 4 'S 77 I CILY OF RANCHO CUCAMO iGA STAFF € EPORT DATE: September 14, 1988 TO: Chafimon and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior CW' Engineer BY Joe Stofa, Jr. Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: MODIFICATION TO CONDITI9NS OF APPROVAL FOR PARCEL MP 9897 - request to mn y t--`;on tons of pprova requiring almie-HTan island within Terra Vista Parkway for a subdivision of 17.08 acres of land into 3 parcels in the Terra Vista Planned'Commiritys. located on the southeast corner of Church ! Street and Terra Vista Parkway? (APN 1077- 421 -06, 1077- 091 -17) I I. APSTRACT The Developer is requesting to delete the requirement for a landscaped rtti 'iar: within Terra Vista Parkway along the project frontage. II. BACKGROUND: Tentative Parcel '11p 9897 was Pspproved by the Planning Commission on Jane 22, 1988 to subdivid(=, -treviously approved. CUP 86 -20 into 3 parcels (Exhibit "B "). The P -w ,1 Map wds required to construct a landscaped median within Terra Vista I'ai -kway from Church Streele. to Town Center Drive to be consistent with the rogv rem nts for DR 87 -08 located on the opposite (west) side of Terra Vista Parkway and CUP 86 -20 on the same property as the Farcel Rap (Exhibit "d "). III. ANALYSIS: On August 10, 19:'8, the Planning Co,, .vission approved a modification to the conditions of approval for CUP 86 -20 and OR 87 -08 deleting the requirement to construct the sane portion of median, because of the minor amount of landscaping that could be provided within this segment of street (Exhibit "C'). An approval of the requested modification will make the requirements for all three projects consistent.. ITEM K PLANNING COMMISSjION STAFF REPORT PP 9897 SEPTEMBER 14, 1988 �. PAGE 2 IV. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commissiort consider all input and elements of the modification request:. if after such consideration the Commission can recommend approval, the adoption of the attached Resolutions would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, B Senior Civil Engineer BkH:JS:sd Attachments: Vicinity Map (Exhibit "A ") Parcel Map (Exhibit "B ") Median Island (Exhibit, "C`') Modification Request Letter Resolution No. 88 -119 Resolution of Approval i 4 � cc z uQa W CC ...._� `' '� J � . �_ �� �_- � I Y" .,.yeµ'... ., �`- �"°�dr j t. .Y N • � " ' `ffi✓ i w '_ 4 -.� �� _ ' �� �, 4*, i �t r i� i� •�. • �,a Lewes H 0-5 Managemient Corp. 11551iaeA M—Wn t W0J* / P,O.!}a"701 UP6r0 CW=tS 917&5/ 714 9G1-WJ v i 19% l 1 A1Iquat 17, 3.988 f Mr. Barrye Hanson Enginearing 1Divisiol: k city of njancho Cucamonga P. 0 Box 847 Rancho Cucamonga. CA- .91730 Subject: Ragusst for Hodiri Parcal Map 9897 cation of Conditiona Dear Dar..- 'i Pursuant to the :Planning coaissionrs action At at A"guRt 10, x -388 appro�ring the modification to the tiarciox nditileting ions of approval for CUP 86 -20 and DR 87 -08, (RSEOlUtions U1' > 88 -16 ©j I wish to formally file as Ra quest. and for 1�?- ioatioiq of Conditions to t:entaativa parcel map the landscepcd median requirement P umbe7r 9897. Thar Would delete of Resolution 8s -119 and Is fnfrom, With ion 3: ParAgzaph 2(b) I have snClosctd a oP�sck for $207.00 for thistreir latest act3onr�. q -AGat, I am expecting pl tatjg' 3 on the Planning Coaamission�s agenda of Septemb.nr 3.� . It finis i s not the case ox' you have any geed aoor regardirf-I this item, plJsssa do not hesitator to ave an. Sincerely, LEWIS HOMES 21ANAGMMr C3�- Kern Nia3 -ikawm Project nevelopment iota/ jh ec", Mk'- Doll Thompson RESOLUTION NO. 88 -119 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSIOM OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, CONnITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 9897 (MODIFIED) WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 9897 (Modified), subm Zted by Western PropQrties, applicant, for the purpose cf subdividing into 3 parcels, tn., real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San 1077 - 091-17, locatedoo:e identified as Chur•chPStreetland Terra6Vista Parkway; and WHEREAS, on June 22, 1988, the Planning Commission held a d4 advertised public hearing for the above- described map. FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCA.MONGA PLANNING COMMISS ON RESOLVED AS SECTION 'l: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the f!ap is ccnsi >ltent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the Proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the Proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting SECTION 2: This Commission finds and certifies that the project has been reviewea onsidered iR compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, and further, h ;s Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. t SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 9897 (Modifieu) is hereby approved su e- o the attached Standard Conditions aid the following Special Conditions: 1. The Developer shall construct Line 1 -3 and a Portion of Line 1 of the Terra Vista Master Plan of Drainage from the site to Deep, 4reek Channel or Provide an alternate drainage d1s ;4sal solution as approved by the City Engineer prior to occupancy of any Buildings. RESOLUTION NC. PM 9897 Page 2 2. The following streets shall be cor-structed full width for the stated limit with the develepmLipt of sidew�jlk and vela rent of the adjacent property: p a. Town Center Drive from Haven Avenue to Elm Avenues b. Terra 'Vista Parkway from Church Street to Town Center Grive, including a .andscaped median; C. Church Street from Haven Avenue to Elm Avenue, including landscape median; and d. flm A6=nue from Church Street to Town Center Drive,. including full improvements for the "TYPE 8" trail per the Terri Vista Community Plan. 3. A master plan for the landscaping of the medians within the following streets shall be cor4:leted and approved by the City prior to submittal of the improvement plans to the City for review: a. Terra Vista Parki +ay for its entire length. b.. Chr- ch Street from Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF 1HE CITY OF RANCHO CUCIMONGA arry T: A 1 t I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do here=by certify thit the foregoing Resolution was duty and regularly introduc d, Pcssed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of June,, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit; AYES; COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, SLAKESLEY, �MERICK, CHITIEA, MCNI L NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ?,ONE ABSENT: COMMISSIC'" '- NONE '�,,� LI E a e xe 3 E 3y �s XI see 4 ~ V M •_4 • 6 �� O � 4� � �r� 1 e■ Zi6 is ifr y+ >v ;r 12 iN o Zr �ti %as :•• _ S IL `• er r rQ� 4 1! r --• w 4 � A v • A 4Z 7~r _• Y b ! • ! `- H$ rj •.�. ff �yy11li1�rlYllf. !� - � �. �i c M= wr d yY y� ��$ uAi May gig' •U� tyM 14 • u i. N M L e • � Y � 1't' ~ � V • •rr 4 • Y � � � r --• w v 4Z 7~r _• Y b ! • ! `- H$ i«` •.�. ff �yy11li1�rlYllf. !� '/l ,� �tlw� �i c M= wr d yY y� ��$ uAi May gig' •U� tyM 14 q� K i 1i lO �y iT w » L � Y � �E a� s � a r Y! I � ►`n 2322 a �wu �'r�iryry V p i 8 p6y N b e = qua MOI d � Y a ip yt' � � I d_ +� c,® \` =iudA iSrt s M Y N u bbG VO C C 4i z z, x > i` y LY L > zz:C M 4 d� -O� 60S CV O� ryaa e b _yy W C y O N Y � � q C • l 'f t L V � a« o C�_ - q�." �Y day ''C N -yam. 3 4. npe° �y V b n O q� K i 1i lO �y iT w » L � Y � �E a� s � a r Y! I � ►`n 2322 a �wu �'r�iryry V p i 8 p6y N b e = qua MOI d � Y a ip yt' � � I d_ +� c,® �, k M Y N u bbG VO {� C 4i z z, x > i` y LY L > zz:C M [ ►0� v3 mq ryaa e b _yy W C y O N Y � � q C • l 'f q� K i 1i lO �y iT w » L � Y � �E a� s � a r Y! I � ►`n 2322 a �wu �'r�iryry V p i 8 p6y N b e = qua MOI d � Y � � I d_ +� 8s �, k M Y N C 4i z z, x > i` y > zz:C C ►0� ryaa e ee 31 a' Y t I A � � � N O RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION 66 THE PLANNIK CO.W.lISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO96 NOWY714's A CONDITION GF APPROVAL FOR PARCEL MAP 9897, LOCATED ON TOE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CHURCH STREET AND TERRA VISTA Pitt KWT Ill, THE TEW VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY (APN 1077- .421 -06, 1077491 -17) A. Cncit -gls. (i) On dune 22, 1988, the Pla►ining Commission adopted Resolution No. 0 &.119, thereby approving., soj.ect to spamified zonditions Tentativv ParW Map 9897, w-41ch creates 3 Parcels on 17,03 acres of land within t?1e Terrw Vista, Planned Coctunity. ManagementiiCorporation usto modify8theacon request appreoval yrequiring Rows ee construction of a landscaped rxdian on Terra Vic�3 Parkway from Church Street to Town, Ceikter Drive.. (iii) On September 14, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ionducted a duly noticed public hearing on. the application and concluded said hearing on that date. !iv) All legal prerequisiter, to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. 8. Resolution. :M'i, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning :-,mnission of the City of Rancho Wcdmonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part iA, of this Resolution are true and correct. ? 8aspd upon substantial evidence presented to this 'Commission during the =- Jove - referenced public hearing on September air 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together Qith public testimony, this Commissi v, herthy specifically finds as follows: (d) The request applies tc the median, island' within Terra Visa Parkway jaetwnn Lhtrn Street and Tonsil Center Drive; and K-11 /0701-02 �___ 9- -14 -88 PC Agenda 8, of 5 RESOLUTION NG. PARCEL MAP 9897 SEPTEMBER 14, 19€ S PAGE 2 (b) A median island within this portion of roadway was not a requirement of the Planned Community text.; and (c) A median island within this portion of roadway is not practical due to roadway width constraints. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the - ,objectives of the Terra Vista Planned Community, and the purposes of the District in which the site is located; and (b) That the proposed use, toaetG!Z;r with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public heal tfs, safety, or welfare, or materially to properties or improvements i'rt the vicinity; and (c) That the proposed use complies :pith each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Terra Vista Planned Community. 4. This Coms.fission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and that a Negative Declaration was issued on September 14, 1988. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby modifies Resolution No. 88 -119 by deleting "including a landscaped median" within - Special Condition 2.b., deleting the check mark under Median Island for the Terra Vista Parkway portion of Standard Condition No. B.3., and replacing Special Condition 3 with the folsDwiong: 3. "A master plan for the landscap.ng of the median within Church Street from Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue -hall be completed and approved by the City prier to submittal of the irTrovement plans to the City for review. I� iz o� The Deputy Secretary to ,his Commission shall certify to the adoption of this resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBE;i, 1998. KANNING COW- USSION OF THE CITE OF nANCHO CUCAMONGA EYs arry c e , a rmar� I ATTEST: "bra a er, eputy Secretary 1 JIJ 1, Brad Buller, Deputy $ecr^.tary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify, Jjat the foregoing Resolution w6,s duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning is mission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the.Planning Comission held on the 140 dAy of September, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES:: COMMISSIONERS:' NOES: COMMISSIONERS. i ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS; CITY.7F RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REP0RT DATE: September 14, 1969 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Beverly Nissen, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TRACT 13738 - RODINE ZDMPAAIES . - A reside-n, al subdivision of s ng e moots on 12.88 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (1 -2 dwelling units per acre), located west of Sapphire, south of Almond. ' AP-N: 1061- 091 -03 Associated with the Tract is Tree Removal Penat 86 -16 requesting the removal of 46 Cypress and 14 Eucalyptus trees. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of the subdivision map, site plan, e evations, conceptual grading plan, cnd issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Project Density: 1.39 dwelling units per acre. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant; Hillside Residential South - Single facaily residential; ery Low Density Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) East - Single family residential; Very Low Density Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) West - Vacant; Very Low Density Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) D. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Very Low Residential North - Hillside Residential South - Very Low Residential East - Very tow Residential West Very Low Residential, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 13738 - RODINE COMPAWS INC. September 14, 1988 Page 2 Ask E. Site Characteristics: The site slopes at approximately 6.5 percent o e sou ,east and is currently vacant except for the vacated ruins of a residence whi, :h is to be removed. Mature gees of varying species are scattered throughout the site. A Eucalyptus windrow bof,ers the southern portion of the site and Cypress windrows are �ocated along the northern and eastern perimeters. , YI. ANALYSIS: A. General: s-he applicant is proposing to develop 18 single Tm31j lots ranging in size from 20,655 to 52,689 square feet. The average lot size is 25,292 square feet in size. The applicant is pqroposing three floor plans with contemporary Mediterranean sty o architecture. Models range Ir size from 2,248 to 2,815 square feet in size. All of the plans are two story with side or rear -on garages being providedl on eight of the lots. B. Trails Advisory Committee; The Trails Advisory Wmttittee reviewed a pro ec on ebruary 17, 1988, and recommended approval subject to t ;e folluwing: 1. The Comimunity Trail along Almond Street shoald be 20 feet in width (22 feet was shown on the plans). L 2. The local trail should extend across the north and west sides of Lot 9 to provide a contir -ous trail. If, for some reason, it is not physically possioie to continue the trail across Lot 9, locL, trails should be provided between Lots 7 and 8, and 12 and 13. C. Desi n Review a Committee: The Committee (Chitiea, Emerick, Committee did not recommend apprproject val et this time and di rec ed the applicant to make the following changes: 1. De.;orative block Nalls along Sapphire and Almond Streets should be desig,'Lrd of a stucco material and should incorporate pilasters, some type of cap material and indentations to accommodate tree plantings. 2. More variety in building elevations should be provided as well as additional architectural detai;i;,g. isle right side elevation of Plan 10006 was identified specifically as requiring additional detailing, PLANNING COMl49Imon TAFf REPORT TT 13738 - RODINE UMPANIES INC. September 14, 146u Page 3 3. An additional model, which is significantly different in outline and bulk from the proposed models, should be provided. 4. More va- 14tion in color scheme should be provided. S. PIP', should be drawn at a larger scale. Committee (Chitiea, wDlakesley�rColem�an) to on yAug August 8, Review 1988. The revised protect Incorporated a decorative wall of stucco with a brick cap and pilasters to be located along Almond and Sapphire Streets. In addition, all elevations were upgraded substantially and an additional model was provided. More variation in color was al-o provided. The Committee recommended approval of !►e revised project s��u°�'t. to the following conditions: 1. The shape of the window panes on Mooe X500 shoul4 be square in shape rather than rectangular. 2. The round vent element should be provided with more finished details, such as louvers or surrounding trim, on all elevations. 3. The round vent on the rear elevation of Model iOOOA should be increased in size. 4. The square window on the front elevation of 10006, Type 1, should be changed in shape to be more compatible with window shapes on the three other elevations. S. Omit the roof the colors #132 (Lifetile Mission) and #110 (Lifetile Padre Brown). D. Tree Removal Permit: Associated with the development of the tract, tKe-a-pp-rfc-a-fiT has submitted an arborist report and a Tree Removal Permit for the removal of 45 Cypress, 14 Eucalyptus trees, and 1 Pine tree. Eighteen of the Cypress trees proposed for removal are located in areas where future streets are to be constructed. Twenty eight of the Cypress slated for removal have either been partially uprooted or have sustained severe branch aamage in recent winds. Twelve of the Eucalyptus trees proposed to be removed are located in areas where grade changes are most likely to occur. Five of the Eucalyptus proposed for removal are felt to be in poor condition. The Pine tree proposed for removal is also in an area of proposed grade change. The remaining Eucalyptus Lea i PLAHNIV4 COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 13738 - RODINE COMPANIES INC. Septer:ber 14, 1988 Page 4 r" L windrow (approximately 79 trees) along the southern boundary and the remaining Cypress windrow (apprnnYimately 103 trees) along the eastern and northern boundary are to be retained as Part *of the subdivision. In addition, various species of trees {Pla..anus, Frarinus and Citrus) Jithin the interior of the tract are to be preserved. E. Environmental Assessment: Staff has completed the nv ronmen a ect Su and found no significanr adverse environmental impacts as a result of this project. If the Planning Commission concurs with these findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate if the Tentative Tract Map is approved. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the General an do a eve opment Code. The project, w1th the added mitigation measures, will not be detrimental to the public health ar safety, or cause nuisances or significant adverse environmental impacts, In addition, the proposed use and site plan, together with the rKommended conditions of approval, are in COmpiiarce with the applicable provisions of the Development Code and City r',andards.. IV. CORRESPONDENCE This itsm has been advertised as a public gearing ' in the ifa�T` a art newspaper and notices were stint to all property owners wa t n eet of the project site. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recur-' .mss that the Planning Commission approve e-nJWve Tract 13738 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions, Tree Removal Permit 88.18 and issue a Negative Declaration. o Res dal iy su ted, Brad u er City P anr,?r 88;8U —.mlg Attachments., Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit 9 Tentative. Tract Map Exhibit "C" - Site Plan Exhibit `'D" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "E° - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "F" - Building Elevations Resolution of Approval with Conditions L -q .L V. pit LA 9 '� a.9 a� d•�(a•O- •J,fO� air \ \•^ \ +\ p S� �\ r• � � - t �� a a mil• ae / , `\ 1 9 - ±may•• —: , _ {'- );j' i � _ `Y '. . i { i l 0 jq � nN §••, 114Z'O NR�! 1(�la.� • 1 0 Adft 11 • ppt of •� , 4 I i %i �G,pE oGa \C rift S• x •O 9 � `C� , rat ��- __ —_ F •• 8 CITY OF 77" 13730 RANG CUC',INKMA TITLE, _ 5/W 6GT'e MIA/ PLA NNM Dl\fbc N L-5 EXH[Brr. A- SCALE: - - - - Im C--� NTH CITY OF ITEM: 131 �b RAN---------- C� C'JCAMONGA TnU: 'rgACr MAP RANNING . DjvL%N EXHIBrr. BP SCALE, r I rAl VVK�V MATH CITY OF rrEmt frl-1-145e RANCHo CLTCAIMCNUA TrrLE- rlm'Lea,44M - V. RANNING DWWN EXHIBrr.- 0 -- S TO AF IM s&o r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONiCA ►.: 'i . M EXHIBIT: SCALE- Fr- NORTH CITY CF mm. /vmg 1 RANCHO cUCAMONGA A nANNING DIVSM EXHIEIM. PN0.iP ��� LgBROIFi'iitaTOB -' — � ' L'B4�t}flll fLiYlWOft. TYPE 1 (nj f7 f[eell PLO=PUM N�..r. r CITY CF Pg. X114ING MOON ^1N L - /ID EXHIWr. SC �2s E a� "eeA'°t°mro" we" NMI KmK"a ? )w?T F: 74IOR ELEVATIONS TYPE 1_ _ `+ EXTERIOR ELEYATIONf TYPE 2 . .. .. ¢ur•r,r r• tom... �� anr•us� ■urrmat . sTP�cAL_aEV�rnaNrcvrTmt.ot�2 . ,-ft CITY oF PUNNING DI' E'M ITEM: TITLE- r�� . ttN�1a1 EXHIBIT. —. V -2 sG i.E: Ep FRONT Wvwfft `••• i • • • ••� ...Gr rahaT.set iurr� �. «. [XT[RIOR.[t.[VATIOkB LUT.Ons CLI ATIOM TYPICAL M"A"" OF TYR t Mf 2 _ +u....•.. ,• •.•w:• TU117 nA "P%An .��.• Cj 7t*'y cF P`A,NCHp CLTCAWXIqGk Tit rya L -/ R SCALE RESOLUTION NO. Ask A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13738, AND DESIGN REVIEW THERLOF, LOCATED SOUTH OF ALMOND AND WEST OF SAPPHIRE IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (LESS THAN 7 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE). APR: 1061 - 091 -03 A. Recitals. M Rodine Companies Inc. has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 13738 as described in the title of this resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract !dap request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On the 14th of September, 1088, the Planninn Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and zoncluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. • This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the f -Its set forth In the Recital:, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Com-...'..;ion during the above - referenced public hearing cn September 14, 1988; including written and oral staff reports, togeti�pr with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to propert;; located on the west side of Sapphire Street, south of Almond Avenue with a stryet f-ontage of 680 feet along Sapphire Street and 455 feet along Almond. AvL-nue and is presently vacant; and (b) The property to the north cf the subject site is vacant and designated for Hillside Residential, the property to the- smth of that site consists of ;tingle family residential in the Very Low Residential District, the proArrty to the east is single farlily residential in the Vary Low Residential District, and the property to the Wrest is vacant and designated as Los Angeles Bureau of Power am Light easement. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced ub,apd 2 above and t is Cow ssiuecifi hereby finds and facts set forth in paragraph klr concludes as follows: RESOLUTION Rio. TENTPTIVE TRACT 13738 - RODINt Septeanbnr 14, 1988 Page 2 (a) That tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, pevelopment Code, and specific plans; and (c) The site is physically suitable for the type c. development proposed; and (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or- their habitat; and (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems- and 11 (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easen*nt acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the I prorased subdivision. 4. ' This A`ofienission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed an( side-Ad in compliance with the California Environmental Quality fct of . ; urther, this Commission hereby issues a Negative P_clar -ition. S. Based 1, k and 3 above, this;nco i sio findings ereby approves the application nsubjectato each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached "hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Design Review 1. The shape of the window panes on Model 15L" shall be square in shape rasher than rectangular. 2. The round vent element shall be provided with more finished details, such as louvers nr surrounding trim, on all deviations. 3. The round vent on the rear elevation of Model 1000A shall increased in size. shall be changed inu shape ntowbe on the moref compatible del iwith fWindaw shapes 1onethe three other elevations. S. The folt ;sing roof tile colors shall be omitted., "Life style Mission" (;#132) ard "Life style Padre Brmwr, " (t0110). RESOLUTION N0. T €NTATIVE TRACT 13738 RODINE September 14, 1988 Page 3 planting 6. n accordance with�Muuia cipal 83-16 de Section �-?.08,100. Existing trees to be retained shall be protected in accordance with Municipal Code Section 19.08.110. Tentativ- I. Provide a drainage acceptance lett,,, authorizing public areas to drain onto private land. L. Overhead Utilities: a. Sapphire Street - An in -lieu fee as contribution to the future undergreurding of the exist!-,,9 overhead utilities (telecorm►unications and electrical) on the opposite (east) side of „apphire street shall be paid to the City prior to approval of the Final Map, The fee shall be one -half the City adopted unit amount times the length from the center of Almond Street to the south tract boundary. b• Almond Street - The existing overhead utilities ors the project side of Almond Street shall be undergrounded from the first pale on the east side of Sapphire Street tc the first pole west of the centerline of the Los Angeles Bur ^au of Power and Light Easement prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. For the portion within the utility easement (electrical and telecommunication) the developer may request a reimbursement agreement to receive one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite .side of the street. For the portion adjacent to the tract, an in -lieu fee as contribution to the futuf•e undergrounding of the utilities on the opposite (north side of :almond Street (electrical) shall be paid to the City prior to Final Map the under group ing shall cost of one-half u utilities teiectricar) can the opposite side of the street minus those (telec,xnmunications) on the project side times the length containing both el Qtricaihand tc _oommunic tionflin s we t of the west tract boundary. 3. The southerly one half (r$ foot of pavement) street improvements along Almond Street shall be extended from the tract westerly to the centerline of the Los Angeles Bureau of Power and Light Easement. 4. Ali street shah have a centerline crown seetion. Street tilt sections are not permitted. S. The dedication for the north half (33 feet) of Almond Street from Skyline Road to the cast side of Sapphire Street shall be obtained in accordance with Condition 6 to follnw. RESOLUTION N0. TENTATIVE TRACT 13738 - RODINE September 14, 1988 Page 4 6. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquirz the required off -site property interest necessary to construct the required off - site impslovements. If the developer should fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final %;p for approval, enter into an agreement with the City to complete the improvements pursuant to Governwnt code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by developer of all costs in connection with the - subdivision. Security for these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit.. That portion of the security reflecting the value of the required off -site property interest shall be the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by developer, at developer's cost, The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement ct the appraisal. ;. An enerjg^xcya access road per Foothill Fire District's requirements shall to along Almond Street to turquoise Street. street. 8. A sidewalk shall be provided on one side only of the interior 9. The Almond Intercept Master Plait Channel (Line 1A) shall be constructed from the existing portion to the ,outhwest extending to a northerly projection of the east side of Sapphire Street or as otherwise necessary to provi:le drainage protection for the Tract as approved by the City Engineer. The cost of constructing the facility is - eligible for reimbursements in accordance with City Ordinance No. 75. 10. Almol,d ,Street shall be constructed full width from Henry Streef to Sapphire Street. A reimbursement agreement may be requested for the cost of improvements of the north half of the street from future develo{iment on the north side of the streat. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1988. PLANNING COMISSION OF THE CITY OF KzIMBURSEMENTS IN CUCAMONGA BY: l Larry e , WdIrMan ATTEST: l ra u I I er, Secretary L, RESOLQTION NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 13738 RODINE September 14, 1988 Page <' Ago& vp °sgilroorra , Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Reimbursements in Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Manning' Commission of the City of Reimbursements in Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of September, 1988,` by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMISSIONERSc NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: CODMISSIONERSs: AMU i i i I I .I r t� i� ; .�i w 7 s« L a"t-0.1.1 a L l u OLj Y�•�y�w'�fA.w�,w ■ +gNg�'�q. „u9.r�i ii. 1^r9 Y pv AY Ny.� YsN ^�Ng6�CV�Q. CN.V aCNM9^"�. pq`_MY ±gN OL��O�V.Q L6A b. =y NUS -j''R� NL YO�yi it$V s Yb' y. 6C A Y W .Sid C C 8 g --pt O sY Vy {�C wY Vq L It:I C >Ya {�'S yyyWCII Y b N, 1 yi JW Y N F F_ QU 2 `- KW H O v g� 6 4Fi a < x O i ghiai floor QUORY NYL M�..11 TaR ND.�L� � cN �t Ca O SM Y Y Y� �+ N ■ _ O E O. OC 9 y N`d�i yCNY �NO�Y Ny �'..LY.� YyY O.WVCBN aa c e ■ LY.ff���,. a:L �D C/.m ®■n �v 6�C0 9 QO OY�Y'n�y� C CY OOgJJ�e^Oi =Y' c4V M ^o $dWY. _��vu�.J. C.O�LN 9a^ JOY_? COR C�a N.Cw oa ^S. J q 2 yYy C�,�C„ C f y'd i �V}ky�Mw V6Y�4 Ga� OYL1 ��w iCw' �NCqu O'J�^_ ^.. ttO O ip, 8 A YY Ny C~yVtl NOOF �po>Ib •, Y a� M�<'y¢19k N C C W V N C �` O 88Y 1r i Y Y ■ K.•• p CNC.^C r OL OYYA �� C C gag_--' O CA NCL�O. NY sY,.CC *gzz- St4'Cpt{aa��YS . .05 KMSN.� Yi i0i� F.0 GL VV i L� Im 6u s • �� H� uY 7 O y"O4YUY'tl ci LCSV ONL�y Jpow L 6. i G •Nl d y �pr � yCL �.iX 9.0 ^Y 06i .N� -CA Y Y III ao� to O P Y `• V MC p C O � C�f�Y y00ii��w �pNy r �B O 6 � F6 6��NgP�N9Y Mr � y�QSF i L� Im �Y O Z H W a El r� u Original Poor Quailty «•rT'NO �'q.'�n c-.?;. oVycy !" i ZE2, <, YNtpp MY.� Y«N� .040 �QC✓C'�w °�a b� W01Y C iC Q} GY A�g�.m, N ^ C ° gig-- LY1. �}N., y ' UL°��' ^Y� u CC0�� Vnyr �Z�q^ S.r -V $,4. LO1u Lr, tau wT. CII ° O C 0. h°• y A ^« Cp N w ra1 ,O q y. L ® j(' °Z L ^ -S CN A RR ^ Y NC ° N 4. M y a q c. �. O i Y■ S+ C C w. �' i. ` r ?. q °OCN r:Y C °Y.O CO,r Ya= 4V« ygMA A«yyN M L "Y265 aF pA�O E::' 96 Q O�N 4L° r1°p MMTA V W^ N • 3�q tq `pCu ��•�,,:QQ�.SWyG; pgg'p Y WN.o C� Gt ac1 q ^q O OY T qq O y L L C ,ice° 0 aM N..2- L tlLq. 5 ?w4 c9�C. NL r�•►A'N VO T «�. CVO VuNe+�S �Y. C« N �NNNMt r S S°L4 MCpO�� YU �.L3YY3ppt . G C A.wiCy �L - 'N®e< ®�M N�jpp p�j �L4�n I 4- - <id S° Y . Ww�9.� etr.4M� NG •1An ,�j t\ 0 NI Lv f -G {y� Y C A Y °'� j y'� 0V 1001 �� 4 COV� Y Gd o a3Q ON T � p, N ♦i 4 u O q 0 Lpy ^ y you •0 L �j + 7.2 ^y3J N ", vow c qp L V. 7i Y. w -« '035� q� q °v �c N= w' �•O. 9 GL of J'� rNw +5 •L'+� Indo G v0�m0 Oqd Z CL 7.Cs ••• N O M•i NO p 3 I � C4 I Yom• �A d M = ^66666 I -- /q �o5"5L 0� «O M M L �. S H �cc n 0 " �w $o °eyoM�.C�'�Y A c = 44 N qrs=i Ma �yr•.c MY.�w+ YY Va.^w'�L L/QU CC Y u g N Y V � L O >♦M V y�6V 'ri <j "JL L LL d L4 Ya.ppu N au o.°..°.yy0 Elm �•0 N1.2 � H N 1 {y� w CC� �� LSY COV� o _ H U C a L3 L ry S.. you •0 L �j + 7.2 ^y3J ", C c qp L V. 7i Y. w -« '035� q� q °v CW ��� O1 qM �i wO. ypyas `SC YL �•O. 9 GL d M = ^66666 I -- /q �o5"5L 0� «O M M L �. S H �cc n 0 " �w $o °eyoM�.C�'�Y A c = 44 N qrs=i Ma �yr•.c MY.�w+ YY Va.^w'�L L/QU CC Y u g N Y V � L O >♦M V y�6V 'ri <j "JL L LL d L4 Ya.ppu N au o.°..°.yy0 Elm �•0 N1.2 � H N 1 n U LL 8 4-c"Alla; Pow' �;1� NaC G g qV '� A4 S L W C °M~.'baO 9wi.l A iilO� _N4 O• HC �..G y. 01 A ^.r oW.yOy Crrt T a as A ^yy rLj 4C �N 1i�yi 'dam �L OI OI 6.�a A of � qw CiO�p Y ■l: Y pLp YgqNAp Y 1 QO YM L��YDY Cqw ^6 *3. S C q.YY NA CYAN O � Oyp=j Cy. ^M ON01 ^RO ttyy9 TTyyLp �. �+ gymy�0 wrT N C M it AYRN ti G � Lam. +Y. L'ILw ..gygp C V 'AM R w.N4 0 _MRi0 p6p�� �.wrG Y0! ++L �COQ4a y:.Y�N YiL ^w C N L G L V YU ^q! w- p V 4 y Yw y' y A `a a Ali ~` M� NC^ N �w�R1AJ mpg N I a;o yY4^ I.YL ycvOeoY•'`F.`druq�'+"Ye ft F5 T7� � N.t tiYpp upa anti �Y q ` NOYa 4OY .,t-. �i �su O O Q GS q M N C C y M Q M1 y d S N U. C� O d1 Y Q C 4 t N92 V y 4q M N ...... w L NLICOy �qMY A w pN M1gM a0 u d Ygq� pN LyO y =TOE" L� N7)�N/. 22q YUb WLS'4QOa4N!^f 7'O y1 aN a+ g ry'O �yL llpi lL U 1 (!.. Oq O.qN «4T YN..Ur^C..q L ^�R C sYt qy. YN ^� L 4�y .=Ok 9.sI^�iiYi7F Y d M L !N R N N Y at+a N�Pq ^+p LNgCU^ Q og y1y �. i GM1{I GNNVr�O� � q F {{�� LN 4 q{. OnYj {,; �~• 4 dI Vt NDi UNPCd �L 4Yt q� C ^Y #�60M CC �aCCw ^� Cw. HwC -NAM 4N�-q. a..0 LMq ^ q yy O yy e. C X O 06 v OI VFW qO�N vC. N NAB: a. _Q C� 4 Y few �'N UC N 11� � -awrYQ Y yA N t g V w 6 V �dyy a N ^ C W •w hrY.G L9Yy pyN ii dyp NG'M1 wa qm iii V �N� ^2y r cy O g q Y 3 % CN Y S q y4V y my y-4 o LWN= C:Va1 o�R L «7r ^ V I l 4 aw C C 1 ^ �6aL ®y LCyC4 Q 4 +! D Vy w N pJ/ p Mtl �M iu 01 N^ � pa yy� +IC u'1Y.Nw. W11 L& V w� NN�II �wqc� `Y Y � q VY i qY �� NNf3 ~Qy C Y ail'^ cL �f�'LY 6a SLpy46a6 o%aY �Y q� +N q C e � �~6 L. -42 A. w ae. ryi rrq Y4�• a � Ir >Cw .2wc p iyy V _ ^N. y S N' L q +r O.0 ^. ^V 41Y0 `4 N4 yOjc4. Cd c~V 6 a Y yY A 5! 7 L� 4e ♦ fi e A N 14 L �w Ntip w8 a� Y q L si O N 1 A Y b Il -N . A1tgM c 1 yqC+ 1� yu� UY t Y Y M d 0 C�W00 pp.Cw .w -iiq 11 N 4 x� b Y 4 > SON aQ N X CL qDt ®p O Ofgy�.$ Yb Ye�N. �L $1WN►$QV gQgyYy�Q uv�iYC�aq 1 _ aq•��rS YrM j�.YY�t bN w y��eGg1Y� Tjg4 »ya 4c�'yQyL C KN� YI FIi.aY ViMUp. i U H N n 11 0 E V W L Y O �N1( S 777 � C @ Original Poor QWIRY 01N @V a O p ffi'p H �w II Y Gr L OQ.Q�.Y �lfffiJ w. wy q J ^4 y�wa~y. QVw fS C C O y .w L w pi's 9g` L J Q2� O NG3 O yOi:=R Cyy�// C SS U {� yCC� °7q�'S�a��i O1acwy 6� c`S � oq�,i isr3•. >,Q'f c uwLi �i C qOI 1 Ni M #N ucCO p iCM C �y'm1 �R W p 4ffi C�9LGUu _tt@if.3p,LV 1" L,gsi 4 j t/fw 4 .S t Q 'tl d P yO �A]. y W S!U I -Za .2 qa W a Y =.A y0i: wOO $N Sv 44�grr N L gSxgJC Nq�{Lp�V c3 uq aRn 43 c �> w i' . L > N » y L d4 0 tea @ y42 ^a ZOE cogs 4 a .20 w Rq4 .N. Cam^ a�Y�Cl �� sw- tyY Z Ob r_~i S s 'IMj OY�n @w ffiLq O r C�Yy Vk�royl` Qom. +� N Y 1. art m yYy C N gas L`.L.N O' w awK L�n61 6. aTY� LL 4 U O 0i Lq MLMpj a >.. _N y0 R ipp �.>'.YM� N 304L. �l .1 L.1.3 ^. < OgV.ny 0.0 6t V W L Y O �N1( S 777 � C @ ECG ^q YS C g� Ys 01N @V a O p ffi'p H �w HK b q 1" w �NNlahy1�� Vol T M YPQQ �s p aqn CY L {� yCC� was L az +-c ■Lyj. °oum yy,$ >,Q'f Ol TMq �y,� Cf C qOI 1 Ni llrr @ OlO^ yyY 73 p q yCCC.yC C OCC�ti ^ �p SG Oq 4.w d'�ygY N Q Y Na w w� 4Y4 a Y�Iw� �{VI/.�f.Xx N N LC wN 4y� gu 44�grr N L gSxgJC Nq�{Lp�V c3 uq api'pM C^ V`y1Y w9Op N N WGtN Lr' r pW CQ qq� y C V W � WLLY {Yq� � W� 01v 4V fj�.q r_~i S s 'IMj @w ffiLq O r C�Yy �C+N yyC c4C p. N s A�Y ^kw N gas NQQ i f[GCy Iw;A YL (uU N w Y^ yMCO '�f y z M L �.>'.YM� N 304L. �l .1 L.1.3 ^. < OgV.ny 0.0 6t CCW aKw n ^ rr W ^QY OTC a C Tp 4 rtu� I L` O p AY _� ECG ^q YS C g� Ys Y K L w iOS O p ffi'p H �w HK b q 1" w �NNlahy1�� va.a T wy � NN YC 4LL 2% q i was L az +-c ■Lyj. °oum yy,$ y�Waw+N 4o C r @y afW L p4 Qppi4iY w , OL ^04 2.2 C Y2L C C OCC�ti ^ �p SG Oq 4.w ~4W�§. it w w� 4Y4 a Y�Iw� 90 ^� N LC wN 4y� gu e�'��aq.� q yNy c3 uq api'pM C^ �114.q N N 4 U.C. r 1 jCy'N _� `7p CCq� N� q C t 0 C HK b q M +a L va.a T wy M�y -N a' a 2% 4 was L 42 +-c ■Lyj. °oum yy,$ y�Waw+N 4o C afW Qppi4iY ��� 2.2 C Y2L C N u'8c SG Oq 4.w ~4W�§. W „:�% eyCNS @Y -.s c a Y�Iw� 90 ^� `e wN 4y� api'pM C^ � Q$ y'y yHL� G7 _, - -__ - ! ” I oea6wla, ol UMIATi621 ... op 6 5. s °oIL u —Nz E 0 liz . E - '4 2 Mw. t2 O yy11 -M! PN G, H I c: Cw A n CNU C T -V -;, E I ,CO 4^ b "'o; 2 E ppC , Vu -. .O t tee a a 2:;c;3 �2 2C'2 :55 'Zo C Be- I 1 E.4 - ve. t,41 6 a:- .4-13 US r a N F[za 2 aL b .6, s g m Zz oo Eta Cy nLY oc wm �c 38 3.;Zo kv a wo I -c -.a I —.F. Bu awau oaf "t! 2. z I &Vs c I? sc .5v.Q c 135 ti me, m "H-N 6 L "= 4:1.761 .6" c ec 9-w 9 1. j ` S .1 G2 a I 1. 01191"81 Poor Quality =LI Ov $ .ao. �° <a•Y � .or .r ==o :44H vqY ~O 'ce v�o,. 010 oNV W .a aN N � � oaou or -$ o �V 0'N�• �1 w C� a °w yyG�O E� CQ �CVZg- ZE A$$' �° AL&.. ' "�fcp c2$ «° a LU 7E CC= N .11!aVO 00 L VO YLV 1^y� tl�� rw .pQN � o�� o��$S o �Y �, a� � co� `aa _� ou, ^ N may, •- i qY Y� Lpp C CC01 `yU L4� k, pVp OY '�` C4 a0 G. 4 �LL� Vy NLi ^� 1�N ^IV _C MG VYO.i ^_ ` yr� VL `L.e Cy 9Ig� q 7fi �L Y y0 O r.� LN El °i1'+o . -N.. A 9$$: vl4 EI.Y,$ 4V O � «M r[J YS ci7 ,�y? � € � � �y+•� � Q «c _,QJP r I I S L •a N •• •1 V V Y � v B � L ^U O 4 U H O Aly Ay L d L ^� .20 poPb `.i4 4CNC G Fig UL NN NViY �: w Nr q.0 • L� ^4O � Nw Mii ~Ly ■JO 3« .� ffYfYI Y ^.` CCN 3YL Y -`Y' yC IIC� ■� Appr. _e .'o, Y Y�. gOS•CCL• CS L1. 7 7 < L 4 N J Y U 4-n; 5a; $ ci qL q p L 1� ��`YwruS cn� O L +Ypp G' at pNO 7L Vp; wS" a dQw � �YyL Y C w C N COY aN�yetl CL fq ® Cal L R j� 7 N q Y y VL Mq ^'r �ttgw� AYC N L p � LI I -,0� _1 a ell w 9 n. �o p u O u� N O 6 M1 u L O � Y01 •�.LO' Y !c It!LI o m' c5 � L w c C 4 HOC =!! O i o O L4 O LPL �YV .L oa+° Y� 4 Y tl L yM 9 C + u M N Y■ b I V G e y • Vu °C s iYJ9 �VY� e x v jam! C�Cy'� O � 0•�ya Vy MAY' o.a o�p Y o. ay r�p� 01 Y Nw N� cc uau+u. w Y «= w v N }N+ N a L� CVO nZ ui M t z M C N 7 Y L C L p Y « p' r L N ^Y Y C ! P6. Y "wrty� V Lw p =L/ V N ! L N gp=" b t Y M N ! N j( NuY Y C G W Y w O' y� me_ ggL 3a� V mY L e O r Y y Cp L N C C L u V L�. ? Ycppye Y -,K o O N N M Yw GN.Y.N . �I Z �j « Y _ x C w � a « CV H ' 4 M L V L 9 O V w- T A DL ao v M O qp i xs N V O L C6 w y p . •• aY u« Y L m L N O 11 Z- LU Q yy n« �o F L 5 ~i u �N� '83. rye o. V a wM« $YC u °e is u .5'« u• eO1'L w. o e o o« C.�YO M ^Y OI C..: na a QO �a t U :U:- :NLa Y Q. 1.1 1 � YI I 11 E. — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 14, 1988 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: William J. Silva, Deputy City Engineer BY: Wal.t Stickney, Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Vacation of San Diego Avenue - from Foothill Boulevard to north of San Bernardino Road - Parcel Map 10238 BACKGROUND: On June 22, 1988, the Commission approved TenZ:�tne Parcel Map 10238 with a condition that Sao Diego Avenue be vacated from Foothill Boulevard to the Southern Pacific Railroad right -of -way. The applicant, Cucamonga County hater District, is now requesting thwt the vacation occur (Refer to Exhibit 084). ANALYSIS: Noeth of San Bernardino Road, San Diego Avenue is unimproved and not a part of any tr0fic circulation system. South of ".an Bernardino. Road, San Diego Avenue is paved and is currently used as an access from the portion of San Bernardino Road west of Vineyard Avenue to Foothill Boulevard. The ,-L=ent of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan is to vacate San Diego Avenue as a public street and cul -de -sac San Bernardino Road, while maintaining access easements for those properties which currently abut San Diego Avenue. This will best utilize the land for development. RECL-N ENDATION :. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the street vacation and forward it to City Council for final approval. Respectfully submitted, William J. Silva Deputy City Enginr:r WJS :NS;sjrn YTEN N \/AClbl-r 40 Cy OF RANCHO CIJCAMONGA ING ONION 11 11 V VAEATION OF SAN LEE[O AVENLE n ATY OF RANCHO .3 'O t. � N VACATION OF SAN DIEGO AVENUE -pg '. Tr�.iae L. LXMM..-- B x sj i - ----_. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 14, 1988 TO: Chairman and Membevs of the Planning Commission FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer BY:: Barbara Krai1, Assistant Civil Engineer SUQECT: ENVIk9NMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 11671 MISSION su v s on a W-at-r—cs—of land into 35 parcels n t e eneral Industrial Area (,,ubarea 11) and the Industrial Park Area (subarea 12) of the Industrial Specific Plan, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets and between Pittsburgh and Buffalo Avenues (APN 229- 263 -23 through 27) I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Re uested: Appresal of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map as SFOWn on Exhibit "ii" B. Parcel Size: Range in size from 1,44 acres to 7.97 acres as shown on the Tentative Map (Exhibit "B "). C. Existing Zoning: Industrial Park, subarea 1.2, and General Industrial, subarea 11, of the Industrial Specific Plan. D. Surrounding Land Use: I North - Existing industrial buildings South City of Ontario, Vacant land East - vacant West Existing industrial building and vacant land PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PM 11,671 - Mission Land Company September 14, 1988 Page 2 E. Surrounding General Plan and Development Code Designations: North General Industrial, subarea 11 South City of Ontario East - Industrial Park, subarea 12 West - Industrial Park, subarea 12 F. Site Characteristics: The site is vacaot except ice, ne existing industrial building on Parcel 1. IY. ANALYSIS: The purpose of this parcel map is to divide 97.96 acres of an nto 35 parcels for industrial use. Development Plans for Parcels 6 and 7 `re on tonight's agenda for Planning Commission approval as DR 88 -20 and a master plan showing the future development of the remaining lots has also been submitted and will be discussed as part of DR 88 -20. Two issues associaed with this pro3ect are: 1. The combining of the parcels adjacent to Fourth Street which will be discussed as a part of OR 86 -20; and 2. The Iccatioa of drive approaches. Thp project has been conditioned to L.dminate and /or relocate drive approaches in order to provide for traffic safety along Ve major streets fronting the project. Special Conditions 4, 5 and 7 have been placed on the parcel map to combine parcels adjacent to Fourth Street and to dedicate the right to restrict vehicle access to the City on fourth Street and a portion of Buffalo Avenue. This will allow the drive approaches to be located at the time of the development of the parcels along these frontages. It is noted that the combining of parcels will reduce the total number of parcels from 35 to 26. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PM 11671 - Mission Land Company September 14, 1988 Ask Page 3 Special Condition 8.b, has also been placed on the parcel map to relocate the first drive approach south of 6th Street on Buffalo Avenua, to align with the proposed street on the east side of Buffalo Avenue to'eiiminate left -turn conflicts. The developer has commented that this would conflict with marketing criteria of lot size and placement of curb cuts. III. ECJWONMENTAL REVIEW: The applicant completed Fart I of the Initial Stu . to 1"c'o-n-racted a field investigation and completed Part II of the Initial Study. No adverse impacts upon the environment are P.nticipated as a res0 t of this project. Therefore, issuance of Negative Deal4ration is appropriate, IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding propFr owners and placed In the Daily Report Newspaper. .Posting at the site has also been Completed, Y. RECO144ENDATIOk. It`• is recom. tided that the Planning Commis:;ion consider nput and elements of t" Tentative Parcel Map. If ;after such consideration, the Commission can recommend approval, then the adoptlon of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, ,6"V14 W l Barrye R. Hanson Senior Civil Engin*er BRH:DK•sd Attachments; Vicinity Map (Exhibit "A ") Tentative Map (Exhibit "B ") Master Plan (Exhibit "C ") Resolution and Recommended Conditions of Approval CIS OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA o C i . a �iosY zf PARM Panco, a 91 t.iU AG 2Z0iA4 11 tt Bifi Ap l.dh As PAR= 3 3JQ+ A4 / 7.078 AIC%L PAR , —.ObO �f \. • : PARCB PA� PARS,` tSieA4 sltiA4 r 20fAALL 109, A4. —_�ti f�01:g PANS � PARCH, H PAAC(y, „ PARCi, P 1.0mA4 9.00ih A$ fLi PAR= 3 / 7.078 AIC%L PAR , —.ObO y Sy PAWAL 2 109, A4. PARCH, H PAAC(y, „ PARCi, P a1oA4 TJ0mA4 I PAN& 8 ' 8 foe ya I A7Y R4. PA it ° t.OMAG �p PAN& „ PAS r w; ow lift" 21W k lam AA III•. \ PAKK 19 PAMOL PARb 1 td ►ARM S PAIIC$ F 3Me L ,� t004A4 20M A4 26 UftAM Il t ® iARCa -y .mot, y PAICC,p `' ts41 m Tt. PARCIL 20 PARCH, , 21 s 1.0prA4 1.M644 ex4r. AA T.6fiA4.• own intmu 1 L -tj ou ii ti �p � I M! S /0 L A N[1 MASTED PL j mow.. C OF ; PARCEL tAp I I j 9V ]RANCHO CUCCAMONGA► nna.. Mom PLAm I. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF' THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL NAP NUMBER 11671 - APN(s) 229- 263 -23 THROUGH 27 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 11671, submitted by Mission Land Company_ -,!•?';;ant, for the purpose of subdividing into 35 parcels, the real Stater of situated Cal ifo nia, the identified as Rancho APN(s) Cucamonga, 263 -23 tthroughn 270 located between Fourth and Sixth Streets and between Pittsburgh and Buffalo Avenues; and WHEREAS, on September 14, 1988, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above - described nap. FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: I. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. low 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: This Commission finds and certifies that the project has been rev ewi R and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 11671 is hereby approved subject owe —attached Standard Conditions and the following Special Conditions: 1. Landscaping, including irrigation, shall be installed in the median island within Sixth Street prior to Final Map approval. The landscape and irrigation plan, in accordance with the City Master Plan, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. i PLANNING v',',NMISSIOm RESOLUTION No. Ter,tative,?arcel Yap 11671 Page 2 2. The existing overhead utilities (telecommsunication and electrical except for the 66 KV electrical) on the project side of Fourth Street shall be undergrounded from the first pole on the west side of Pittsburgh Avenue to the first pole, on the east side of Buffalo Avenue prior to. Final Map approval. 3. Fourth Street shall be reconstructed and/or overlaid to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to Final Map approval. 4. Parcels 13 through 18 shall be combined into I . parcel. S. Parcels 19 through 22 and parcel 25 shall be combined into 1 parcel. 6. Trees to be planted along the Fourth, -Stet frontage shall be placed a mlnfmm of 5 feet from the outside liameter of the existing storm drain pipe or as a therwise determined by the City Engineer. 7. The developer shall dedicate to the 'City Of Rancho Cucamonga the right; to restrict vehicle access on Fourth Street (along the entire frontage) and Buffalo Avenue (from proposed "B" Street to Fourth Street). 8. Non-vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: a. On Sixth Street except for two openings as shown on the Maser Pl&n. b. On Buffalo Avenue from Sixth Street to propooed "ON except for an opening aligned with the proposed street on the east side of Buffalo Avenue and a Joint access opening between P arcel s 32 and 33. 9. Easements for Joint use driveways shall be provided for parcels on major and local streets prior to approval of the final map to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 0 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. Tentative Parcel Map 11671 Page 3 Afth APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGH BY: Larry T. Vc Nic!, Cbdirman ATTEST: Brad Buller, ecretary I, Brad. Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of th'4 Planning raamission held on the 14th day of September, 1588, by the following vote- toMeN;,: AYES: COMMISSIONERSt NOES COM.+tISSIONERS: ABSENT: CG.wISSIourp F p g 0 �Y v K i K M OdgineW Poor 011ai1ty T Z �d$ r y a Hw � �i k asg qi 0 4 ;g1 iy n ;s.. p y tgo =�y_ y�•• ��� ',4j• 6 Y —rY i� r� it • V _ 1 f, u = Y e a y 3 t: r 0 ee �a V` Or YN t+ n 4 y w .fir $w si r! � s J.ss 8 Ig ;I tl� t8 j _ c 44 yyyyyyp y •�. a Y�` ` Ya yaa � M ��r • ly WaYYY Ci;. N V A ; 401'..00 KVM r N w � f O Itl V. _ - 0 4 ;g1 iy n ;s.. p y tgo =�y_ y�•• ��� ',4j• 6 Y —rY i� r� it • V _ 1 f, u = Y e a y 3 t: r 0 ee �a V` Or YN t+ n 4 y w .fir $w si I g. s J.ss 8 Ig ;I tl� `OY _ c 44 yyyyyyp y •�. a Y�` ` Ya yaa � M ��r MQ� iMY ly WaYYY Ci;. N V A ; 401'..00 KVM r N 11 El�. Em, vE �� Y A VA w E O V ai N ♦ N 17 O 1 > c o � VE mss$ « 0 p N «Sy 1 L C L Vy u HL «` CA. CV rrV A g OH �a b «S W � • A o�� �u ^ ws3o psY y`l� cUo 3° S MC 4 OiO •+ � �.�4a °s_ Lgr t S� a Y • L =O. •:�:�pYj L �.CR p.Y may. ���. f tN 1 10 w • vE �� Y A VA w E O V ai N ♦ N 17 O 1 so% `Z a, t 6 O Y ap : s« Lova f � N 12 4 Y Y Chi C■ � jo =L�••L mx f N I N M La > c o � « 0 p N «Sy 1 4 L C L Vy OV Ate. A g OH �a b 1 9 w C 4yC pqs yy44 ws3o psY y`l� cUo so% `Z a, t 6 O Y ap : s« Lova f � N 12 4 Y Y Chi C■ � jo =L�••L mx f N I N M La N o � « 0 4 L C L Vy Y � } � O� NL CSC �Yi pqs yy44 ws3o psY y`l� cUo �a� N A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: SW4ember 14, 1988 TO: CPairman and Me*ePs of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Cindy Norris, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: 1. VARIANCE 88 -08 - LEWIS HOMES - A' request to reduce requ re oo se ac at e site boundary to a mii of 12 feet and a request to reduce the required amour common open space from 35 percent to 13.2 percent i multi - family project located on 4.6 acres of land !r Medium Density Residential District (8 -14 dwel ?ing c per acre), located at the northwest corner of 1 Highway and Vineyard Avenue - APN: 207- 193 -41 through PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A. Action Requested: Approval or ;%ariance 88 -08 B. Surrounding Land Lse and Zonin 1E�— = x s ing own omes; dium Desity Residential (8. dwelling units per acre). South - Multi- tenant Industrial Park; Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 1). East - Condominium project; Medium Density Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre). West - Cucamonga Creek and Vacant; Flood Control and Madium Density Residential (8 -14 dwelling Units per acre). C. General. Plan Designations: Project 5ite a um- ens ty Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre). North - Medium Density Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) South - General In?',strial East. - Medium Density Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) West - Flcid Control and Medium Density Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre). ITEM 0 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VARIANCE 88 -08 - Luis HOMES September 14, 198E Page 2 II. ANALYSIS• E A. General: The applicant is requesting a variance to reduce the in er or sideyard setbacks from 20 feet to a minimum of 12 feet and to reduce the percent of common open space front 35 percent to 13.2 percent. V. Background: Tentative Tract 11734 Was originally approved by Tffe_TTa—n-5Tn'9 C(xmission on October 14, 1981 for a total of 98 cnndominium units. Prior to completion of the project the developer ran into financial difficulties resulting in foreclosure on the prcperty. In December of 1987, the Barmakian Co. pruposed to complete the remainder of the project. Howt,.wer, as tree project had been approved prior to adoption of t*E current Development Code, variances for a reduction in the setbacks along Vineyard Avenue and Arrow Route and for the amount of guest parking were requested. On February 10, 1988, the planning Conission voted to approve the setback •,eductions but denied the parking variance. Then, in March 1988, the Barmakian Co. was unable to obtain an extension on their escrow and had to withdraw from the project. Lewis Hemmes subsequently purchased the prope -ty. On May 11, 1588 Lewis Pomes of California submitted a Design Review application for the remaining three phases. The applicant is proposing to modify the unit type to include primarily single family detached units as opposed to the attached 2, 3, 4 and 5- plexes originally approved. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In reviewing the Variance request. the Planning omm ss on Wa-T-WTST to consider the following facts which support the mandatory findings: 1) The applicant is developing the remaining three lots of a recorded map with 96 rather than 98 units as previously approved. As the street and lot layout has already been determined there is limited flexibility for unit placement. 2) The total amount of usable open space proposed, 50.5 percent, exceeds the 48 percent approved in 1981. The total amount of usable open space required is 40 percent. 3? The configuration of the large apea space are�.s are consistent with previously approved project except that there are fewer significant amounts or :,pen space between the buildings due to the use of single family detached. and duplex units. instead, D PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VARIANCE 88 -08 - LEWIS HOMES September 14, 1988 Page 3 the project has a large amuunt of area devoted to private open space (37.3 percent), as the areas between units have been incorporated into the private yard ar us consistent with thQ recommendation of the Design Revieo Committee. 4; The proposed - 14terior sideyard setbacks are generally consistent with those of *he existing units ads ..)nt to the western boundary . and the previously npproved urli t:, to the north. a) The setbacks of the existing ,Units along the west boundary vary from 17 to `a feet, where as the proposed units will be set back app:.ximately 16 to is feet. b) The setbacks of the proposed units along the northern property boundary will be a miniimum of 15 feet while the setbacks of the previously approved units varied from 20 to 15 feet. c) T�,e setbacks of the existing townhomes to the north of the projert site vary from -nroximatel,r 15 to 11 fe:t. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in the Daily Report nears paper as a Public bearing, the property posted, °an no ccs within 300 feet of the project site. In addition, Lewis Homes has met with representatives rf the existing residents. V. RECOMMENDATION: Sta;Tf recommends that 'the Pladning Commission con uc a ku is Hearing to consider all input and elements of the Ci After receiving Pommssion - anupport the ipdings outlined in the staff report, staff recommends approval of this variance through adoption of the attached res�,:ution. Re a fuII s tt Bra 1 City Pla ner n:CN:Js Attachments: Exhib',t "A" - Letter from A pp 1' Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" 'xhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Exhibit "F" scant Location Mai Previously approved Site Plan Site Plan Detail of Westerly Boundary Detail of Northerly Boundary Lewis Homes Management (:`a pp. 11561404hMamhlnAm .. / PO, Box( 7p /Op4nLW, Mj&917PS/7149p.09?1 september 6, i9ss Dan Coleman, ,Senior Planner City of P.anct ;o Cucamonga P. O. 36X 807 Raricho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re; Revised Variance 32enuest - Mulberry Place; Lots 3, 4 and 5 Dear Dfin= Lewis Hanes would likf% to amend its previous Variance applications %aichl requeat.ed a reduction in the required.3S percent common open space requi==ent to 20.4 percent. We are modifying our previous request to 13.2 percent in order to meet the desires of the Design Review Casmittee. The proposed site plan 6arrently provides 50.5 percent as total common open space. The i'reas, as shown in our exhibit, at the tear and side of each individual ur t is ccmmol3 opsn apace, but utilized Jay each, t1lit as brivatel ecius�ve use- As ogee space. As so defined in the city's development code,; the actual common us b . open space is ZS-2 percent. Since the open space in the existing two phases is divided .n this same way„ we feel that our proposal would not pose any detriment to the site and is compatible with the existing project. Should yesu have any additional questions or comments regarding this, please call me at any time. CORP. - klro jt4 Manager gicbard A. Lewis Gerald T. R--yan 0 IM S .y U Lewis Homes Management Corp. 1156Poetk MCuntlinAvenue /P.6. Box 570 / Upland, California 91785/714985-0971 June 3, 1988 Dan Coleman - Senior Planner City of R ,ncho CucamOnl a P.C. Bost t,07 gancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: variance - Mulberry 'lace. Lots 3, 4 and 5 Dear Dan: ariance cf the required 20' Lewis Homes is requesting a v uyterior site building setback. As shown on our Proposed site from the plan, we are locating our units Tracts um f 15' 11144. This interior site boundary separating approved proposed setback is consistent with the and g consistent with setbacks of.Tract 11733 and Tract 111,.4, City standards prior to the recent amendment of the Development Vie, Since both referenced projects have been either e�a pro a and/or built to lesser setbacks than currently nor is tj-lg of a special privilege is not at issue, mpatibility to surrounding properties. SbO;ld you require ar =y additional information regarding this variance request, please call me at any -cime- Singly, S gQ <-r, 2+I"AGE2MNT CORP. L+ act Manager Richard A. Lewis, Lewis Homes Gerald T. Bryan, Lewis Homes 0'!!�- WA 1 U Lewis Homes Management Corp. 1156Poetk MCuntlinAvenue /P.6. Box 570 / Upland, California 91785/714985-0971 June 3, 1988 Dan Coleman - Senior Planner City of R ,ncho CucamOnl a P.C. Bost t,07 gancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: variance - Mulberry 'lace. Lots 3, 4 and 5 Dear Dan: ariance cf the required 20' Lewis Homes is requesting a v uyterior site building setback. As shown on our Proposed site from the plan, we are locating our units Tracts um f 15' 11144. This interior site boundary separating approved proposed setback is consistent with the and g consistent with setbacks of.Tract 11733 and Tract 111,.4, City standards prior to the recent amendment of the Development Vie, Since both referenced projects have been either e�a pro a and/or built to lesser setbacks than currently nor is tj-lg of a special privilege is not at issue, mpatibility to surrounding properties. SbO;ld you require ar =y additional information regarding this variance request, please call me at any -cime- Singly, S gQ <-r, 2+I"AGE2MNT CORP. L+ act Manager Richard A. Lewis, Lewis Homes Gerald T. Bryan, Lewis Homes 0'!!�- WA 1 7 Im lu- T,.( hem' yw Unit standrrdf , •sue!- J i i1 JA 1y 1� s`4 y, Cisi►rpa b j ( a•iPaC 'IV 11 14 4 s 2 Nil. i1 F 1 C— I r _a' {, I I i .ZI f p 1 t [ '—{ It —fit f}L� k ' 6 L { �` ` 1TR 1T6 174 17S ITS ll `r%IJ% ,5b T 77f0 tlq lf6' f Ya t/Mp 1�3 576 4� 17{ �1^75..17R m li o �5 .� i� \•` I t75 faC r t .76 174 1 74 17s me u _ _ ,.� :� _ •,. , .. ' :1,` 1 �< tiara !) � : 6 3 0 � v '..' �. ri.utmanui ogvt ,i :� :} — - .-!' � { • U 1 f 1 i t 4� � ii =� t j LdT�"A' c ' ; � + so- & •���'•. w 1 s l GfGJ veo 71.4 raa 174) 17S' .10 { I = a. U <. • 4 ICas, fJSa^.�T ITS 17d [ n,t j, �sr�c �i•< :. ` v is z ra , 17s rT• % 5: x V� •.':Kea n.. � i - 4 . EXISTWO 1! � L _ �•� � } Ait; '•- vAvtwa ' RCltS7� 2 d 'r � • .f, DEVORATIX �.11 awl CF RFAd= RP R , TT; fez WLANNM DA%M 0_8 SCAM of 16W.a� +tv /.T "AD 176 17 � 1 (k � ' IT y0 4 tp l V/ •2 GP / �,lot y� 3I .. > �17 z v► -e ,�� e 8 . 4 17 NORTH M1 y L r' L €: aTy GF RANCHO CLICAMQNGA 1'I'F.M= DIMON ' t+gs E7�i-IiB�P =-Ad-- tom; tJ'� l Ji 176 17 g 174 175 i 1'? 5 � 17fi /.7 PAID 3L? PAD i 613 4AD /.2 PAD W FAD 17f 1'75 9 F 7,aGP G.P �, GP � . 2 &P. \. } , gk r it ! A'J G.P + GP i+, 8QG rP. \ A 6 2 &P. 0 G.P T�5 G.P i RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RAiVCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 88 -08 TO REDUCE THE INTERIOR SITE BOUNDARY SETBACK FROM 20 FEE' TO 12 FEET A0 REDUCE THE PERCENT OF COMMON OPEN SPACL FROM 35 PERCENT TO 13.2 PERCENT FOR THE PROJECT LOCATES AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF VINEYARD AND ARROW ROUTE IN THE MEDIUM DENSITY DISTRICT AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 207 - 103 -41 through 97. A. Recitals. (i) Lewis Homes of California has filed an application for the issuance of the Variance No. 88 -08 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On September 14, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed r:blic hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution ha 2 occurred. B. 'lesolution. NOW; THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: L This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on September 14, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located ' the northwest corner of Vineyard Avenue and Arrow Route with a street fron, of 476.33 feet along Arrow Route, 588.12 feet along Vineyard Avenue and lot of 540.27 feet and is presently improved with 35 dwelling units; streets, or.s space and all perimeter landscaping and walls; and (b) Properties to the north and east of the subject site are zoned Medium Density Residential, the property to the south of that site is within the Industrial Specific Plan Subarea 1, and the property to the west is designated Flood Control. (c) The application has been submitted to allow the completion of the remainder of a 98 unit townhome project. PLANNING r.mrssION RESOLUTION No. VARIANCE LEWIS HOMES September 14 -- 1.998 Page 2 (d) The total amr.\tnt of usable open space provided 50.5 percent exceeds the minimum required ceder the optional development standards (40 percent). site vary from( 15 t o11 feet setbacks of the town is iesss than es foot currently required by the Development Code. (f) The interior sidayard ,setbacks proposed are generally consistent with the existing units along the western boundary and those previously approved along the north property line. 3. Based upoi.-Ae substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That strict or 1Steral interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hafdship inconsisteni with the objectives of the Development Code. (b) That there a -e exceptional or extracrdinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the .property involved or to the intended use of "the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. (c) That strict or literal interpretation and enfr _ement of the specifiee regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. (d) That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. (e) That the Cr ',anting of thv Variance will not _be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approved the application subje;t to 4 each and every condition set forth below. I 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. VARIANCE 83 -08 - LEWIS HOMES September 14, 1988 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF':SEPTEMBER 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. 1wrile-t-- Chairman '.'TEST: Brad Buller ecre ary I. Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning, Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the fc:youing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, 'passed, and adopted by the Planning Co =ission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission lkeld on the 14th day of September, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOM. COMMISSIONERS: ABS,aAT COMMISSIONERS: E I 0—(3 �t 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September I4, ' 488 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Cynthia S. Kinser Assistant Planner SUBJECT: VARIANCE 88-17 - 20/20 RECYCLE CENTERS - A reque� e imina e e requ re oo an scape planter alon sides and rear to eliminate the overhead trelli arbor, and to reduce the setback requirement from 50 to 20 feet for a recycling facility located at 9743 Base Line Road in the Neighborhood Commercial District - APN: 1077- 011 -43 and 49. I. ABSTRACT; A variance of the development standards for recycling os ns located on the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Base Line Road (Albertsons). II. BACKGROUND: On Novemher 4, 1987, the City Council adopted Z-rff-n-a-nc-e-7jo. 327 in response to the state's adoption of the California .Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Act. The purpose of this ordinance is to provide regulations and standards for the review, construction and operation of recycling facilities. On April 8, 1988, Recycling Facil4ty Permit 88 -01 was approved with the conditions required by Ordinar,: PLANNING C- `TSSIQli STAFF REPORT VA 88 -17 20/20 Recycle Centers September 14, 1988 Page 2 E I. The recycling facility shall be designed with a. landscape planter at least 3 feet in width along the sides and rear. of the recycling facility. 2. The recycling facility shall be designed with a permanent enclosure or screening, such as overhead trellis or arbor. 3. The recycling facility shall be setback at least 50 feet from any street frontdge. The purpose of these criteria is to insure that the recycling facilities will be an integrated part of the center in which they are located. ?hese features serve to enhance the aesthetic appearance of the facility. Th -se features also do'ine the facility from the parking lot, e, king a. distinctiot between vehicular and pedestrian traffic, thereby reducing possit a traffic. conflicts. In order to approve this vrdriana „ ��_st, certain findings in the affirmative :rust be made. Staff cannot make all the foll -:wing findings; 1. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. 2. That there are exceptional or ext',4zv"dinary circwnstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. 3. That Strict or literal interpretation and en t° -cement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. 4. That the granting of the Variance will not cnnstitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties ci;sified in the same district. S. That the granting of the Vari lie will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, ev welfare, or materially injurious to ;roperti'es or improvements in the vicinity. 1p KI PLANING COf+IMISSION STAFF REPORT VA 88 -17 - 20/20 Recycle Centers September 14, 1986 Page 3 The reason :iced by the applicant in the variance request �Exhibxt "C ") challenge the Code Standards in general, but do not give specific Justification for the site in question. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This i�em has been advertised in The Daily Report newspaper and public hearing notices were sent t5-04 es within 300 feet of the s0jrct site. IV. RECOhff" NDATION: staff rocc.-.nends -chat the Planning Commission deny this W riance — through adoptior of the attached Resolution. If however, the Commission dete-Tnines that the proposal is, acceptable, then direct staff to prey re a resolution with findings for adoption at your next ircnatinr Res ully sy,4%itted, Br er City P sner BB :CK :vc Attachments: Exhibit "A" .- Letter of A.ppro- ,, April 8, 1988 Exhibit "B" - Letter of Apptia'�, April 18, 1988 Exhibit "C" - Variance Rene ,, >; ualy 21, 1963 Exhibit "D" - Site Plan Exhibit "E" - Site Le ---;t Exhibit "F" - Kiosk Specifications Resolution of Denial CITY OF _tANCHO CUCAMONGA April 8, 1988 B.P. Hanrath 20/20 Recycle Centers 18001 Cowan, Building uE" Iryine, CA 92714 pest Oflix goo 801. Raaeho CucamonM CY1ltaniB 91730. (714) 989-1851 SUBJECT: REMLIN6 FACILITY PERK T 85-Cl - ALBERTSON'S FOOD CENTER #661 Dear ter. Hanrath: The pro=ws for the above-described project has been successfeliy ccmple4ed and approval has bean findings, and conditions. Thank granted based upon the foltiowing cooperation dur ig this review process f sincerely articip&tiost and process has been a positive experience for all inncerrel hope that this Fi n A. That -the proposed projecz ;s consistent with the General Plan. B. Th,t the propos;...d project is in accordance with the district e in which the sit nt Codeed the purpose of the C. That the proposed project together with the conditions applicable thereto, w911 not be detrimental to the pr,blic h2tlth, safety, or welfare or materially injurious properties or improvements in the vicinity. to D. That the proposed project will app coply with each of the applicable provisions of the DevelppPnt Code. C. That the Recycling Facility is certified, or has applied be Cali o niaifBeveragea Container 1 Re 1i g r andstter Redurtion Act, Conditions This project is apPraved subje;t to the f'110ating co ditir;,5; 1• See attached site plan for Wroved location. V :.�.. 'JebafnF fir, iit6wn Ca.mrm.TAs� id ®�c" Dcnms L. Stout Jefirey King Cut Sam 13 Recycling Facility+ Albertsans April 8, 1988 Page 2 2. The Recycling Facility shall be designed with a xeiabid Permanent enclosure or screening such as overhead trellis or arbor. Plans shall be submitted and approved by the City Planner prior to Installation. 3. The Recycling Facility shall be designed with a landscape planter t least three 'feet in width (inside dimension) alotyg the sides Ord rear of the Recycling Facility, Plans shalt be submi edfon and approved -., the city Planner prior to 4. Any sianage regvired for a Recycling Facility shall apply for d sign p_mit and comply with the Sign Ordinance of the City of Rancho Gttcamcnga and the approved Uniform sign program for the Associated commercial use. 5. If the operator's Recycling Certificate is revoxcd or susaended by the California Depertwont of Conservation purs!r�int to the terns of the Culi ornia Beverage Goni:ainer Recyciil d Litter Reductioa Act, thii Permit shall be revoked. Please note th @t con4jt,ons MiW wore prior to isfurarsr of bui ng per�j► completion of ar,d plans or g pe;r� its. This decls"on will become fitral unless an appeal is filed within ten days rrom the date of this letter. The appeal must be filed with the Planning Cewirsio;r Secretary it] Writing, together witt: a $62.00 appeal fee. If yov should have any questit.:< F1�cern.ga �;ific coniitions, please feel free contact Cynthia Kinser sp at ; A J899?,86A. Sit.erely, COMMSIMITY DEyELONE97, DEPARTNENT /PLAA + DIY f � 8 d 8 Gity P anner 44.CK.js A- wc.htment: Site Plate cs: Cede Enfor4Mt I � I �-� P-5- w mTirrmrrr;rr. 4 I C a °O u Sg9 sHa�Fis�a ctr�re� - :EUAIICHO-CUCAMONr s.F.c. aRC�r�wco a BASELINE �� A. c►coCcvi by b - a+s tY�E�g • � 12 City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road P.O.Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 To Whom It May Concern, This letter is to serve as an appeal of the conditions placed an the permits granted by the Planning Depa._ment to 20/20 R2cyele Centers for the placement of two redemption i centers in the city of Rancho Cucamonga. In particulars form eardited f 2 this sisal'.inOur 89-03 and that need for this app for a variance from the City's recycling centers guidelines are as fellows: L. Trellis and additionai landscaping i%Nlandsawould require val difficult to obtain property owner's app Landlords see the encumbrance N Ln the landlord's property. center's mobility, as ac, advantage. The kiosk renders a clean permanent look, but such additional requirements then make the wholes center appear too permanentt therefore, jeopardizing the landlord approval. 2. It would be too permarsea;_ for annther reason, in that AB2O2O is a Sensitive political piece of legislation, one which is highly susceptible to change or repeal. Currently there is legislation in Sacramento whicr, could limit the life o'. this program. Should the redemption centers be legislated out of existence, there wou'j remain only the extra landscaping barriers simply consuming, parkins; spaces. 3, We have already ex,;;prierced case% x'n which planning approval was granted, sites up and operating, then due to unforeseer. circumstances, they needed to be relocated. That would be at a substantial additional cost, or impossible with permanent facilities. In the case of the staff recommended site highlighted in the AlbertscA,s plot plan, the the con into twt) pari:els which landscaping highlighted plac e could well cause the relocation of the center some time in the future. 4. Such permanent structures consume ever. more parking space, thus compli sting tight meeting wi l Cynthia Kinser. problem was noted in my first meeting 18001 Cowan, euilainC-;,:Nine, California 92714 17141851.0777 A Division o! Conram•A.Way, IGitr For these reasons, ws Fael it is aPproPriaten`to ask for a variance Pram the existi.L-hg City guide ?Snes. 540S can be identified by working clostely with the gtaPf to � tigata that visual impact. At the 'S'km'4 ti-Mv, increased awarginwss to the availability of convenient recyciinq acRpartursit�r ci sht�ul be achieved .in Rancho Cu Ccamonga.: Please let me know 4zt,$t is to be my next step In this appeal process. i i Sincer,*ly, B. P. Hain-a:th M4n4g0r, Government Affairs. July 21, 1988 Ms. Cynthia Kinser Assistant Planner CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P.O. Box 807 Rai,cho Cucamonga, CA 91730 - cs� r•�• 3 �� C!Je5!ON Dear ins. Kinser: Encl ^sed are the documentation for our request for a variance at our redemption centers in the following two markets: Perry's Marketr 9477 Voothill Blvd. Staters M, 9750 Wineteenth Street I would like to address our opposition to the city's requirement for the screening of our facilities. Such a requirement poses an economic burden and impairs the viability of the pro ect's intention, which is to bring about increased public awareness.. The oconomic burden lies in the fact that these rederpption centers have to operate sheerly on the basis of voluma. The redemption to the consumer is one pennir per beverage container and t've scrap v =1ue is equally zna "lest. Screening precaudes the opportunity to ever be able to operate due to too high start up costs. We are currently evaluating a number of sites for closure due to excessive r:osts, thus never giving th�l recycling program a chance to prove itself. The success of the program will be based on high volumer and higk volume is synonymous with risibility. We now have ope=ted long enouch to provide historical documentation whiff support;: the oelief that a site which is not highly visible will do very: little volume. We need 900_ pounds of alu num per week t,. break even„ Sites which are hidden do les_ than 100 r_c,:n ?s per week. He all recorni of California. aakttY tr s r., via the ply:. { rherpping cen: !' lot --or the sore. i -revd widf :n the s2ri W-.twit, n, Bai1�+•n; A&c r r(Cc1 thin strong need for recycling in the State —ver, compromise is the only way we see of work. we are more than wi .ling to work -taff in find -ng a location within the • ing lnts which will be visible wik1,.1i,n, the f the narketG, yet be hidden by passibly landr:caping w4 thin tht lot, or a spot not highly visible from the street. :14 17147852.0777 ( t Concerning Sunrize Market I spoke with the market owner, and also the attorney for the lardl -:rd (Tom. Bandi), and hav /;a ;been unable to obtain landlord approval,. The,:efore. we be .,gill cIO3'Og that store. I am holding off on applying for the variance for , ",ibert:*nfs #661 until I obtain a 3,001 radius map and proper'cj ownership listings. I hake Placed an order for them, and should receive them in a week or sp. I will then forwatd` them on to your Thank you for your c:,opnration in . this matter. Pie 1,)ok forward to working with you in findir.g a mutually satisfying location for both of our sites. If you have any questions, or -.eed additional. information, please call. m�> at (714) 852 -0777. cordially Barbara. Saperia Government Sp4' *ialist /bjs enc., 1: (D . . I ES P;N1G CEPITER ARCHIP, &. E?ASEkiM11E HO CUCA1a4M A, CALIP®RIJA �"'� -_ CITY OF NORTH ' 9e RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: 86?-" P ANNTNG DI'V'ISION P-12- EXHIB . SCALE: .� Elevations S' 6" t i 3.0 CCutic N eters i 4.0 Yards CODE NO. 3531 Capacit,r, 3.5 Cubic Yards (Approximate) designed for one -man operation r MA:i ERIAL: Glassfibre Reinforced Plastic (GAP) fittings in galvanized steel EXTERIOR: Self - coloured gelcoat - SAM VERSION: 2 drop -in hoteSie, diameter RESOLUTION No. A RESOLUTIOm OF THE RANCHO CUCAMOk.;A PLONNING CORMSSION DENYING VARIANCE NO. 88 -17 A REQUEST FOR Y„RIANCES ELIMINATE THE 3 FOOT LANDSCAPE PLANTER ALONG THE SIDES AND REAR, TO ELIMINATE TN" OVERHEAD TRELLIS OR AR80R, AND TO REDUCE 711E. STREW RCiiTAGE SETBACK FROM 50 ?EET TO 21 FEET FOR A RECYCLING FACILITY 1OCATED AT 9743 SASE LINE ROAD IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMEprIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING -INDFNGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077 - 011 -43 and 49. A. Recitals. of the Varianceo /No. Recycle 8-17 as described filed in the title t()fn this the an� Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject variance request is rem-- _� to as "the application ". Rancho Cuo &monganconductedral,dulyr9notic d pul►lic hearing Planning sonnthe the pp kay of and concluded said hearing on that date. app _.a ,ion (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFoX, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: I. 7 hereby forth in t eRe iCommission t A O specifically Resolution are atdcorrect. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on September 14, 1988 in�ludin written; and oral rtaff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby spe:ificaliy finds as f,ilows: The Line Road with a stn et licat;oOf 90pfeet andplotedepthooft660af 9743 Base presently improved with a shopping center; and at and is shopping center) the The property to the north of the subject site is a family residential, the p open y to totthe east is single family residential, nand the property to the west is a shoppirn center; and elimination of °a 3 fo teiandlapeiPlanter along the sides and rear�ofha te tf recycling facility, contrary to the requirements of Section 17.04.080 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code; and PLANNING COFMISSION RESOLUTION No. VA 88 -17 - 20/20 Recxc'-,e Centers September 14, 1538 Page 2 11 elimination of (;an overhead trellisaoroarborsforea recyclingefa lity,lcontrary to the requirements of Section 17.04.080 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dev_lopment Cod:; and the setback required from streetofrontageefor, submitted to allow a C01srary to the requirements of Section 17.04.080 of the City of Rancho Cuca 'n?9a Development Code requiring a 50 foot setback from street frontage. contradict the objectives viariance as Rancho in the application reasons: the (i) 11he intent is to have a recycling facility that is designed in a manner that is consis nt with the architecture and site plan of the associated commercial use;.ind That the facility be designed with a related permanent enclosure or screening; and (M) That the recycling facility shall be designed to include safety provisions for separating pedestrian and vehicular traffic; and (iv) That the requested ' variance application would not meet the intent of Section 17,04.00'0 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Devel9pmeht Code, 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Coasaission during the above - referenced upon the specific findings of facts set forth iluparag paragraph 1n andn2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would not result in practical difficulty or unnecessary Physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives Of the Development Code. (b) That There are nOt exceptional or extras- Binary circumstances or conditions applicable to ti.�; {property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally district to other proper; ,es in the same . r PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. VA 88 -17 20/20 Recycle Centers September 14, 1988 Page 3 (c) That str';t or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would not depri-.-, the applirsnt of privileges e;tjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. (d) That the granting of the Variance will constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. (e) That the granting of the Variance will be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set fo cj in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby denies the application, 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adootion of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: aray T. McNie , Chairman ATTEST: Brad a er, Sacre ary Y, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho ^ucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoii�q Re )luticn was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a :regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the lath day of September, 1988, by the following vote- to -witi: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: --.. -- CITY 0"" RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATTFREPOWT DATE: September 14, 1998 TO: FRCA: BY: SUBJECT: Chairman and Members of the planning Commission. Brad Buller, City Planner L'ynthia S. Kinser, AssiStant Planner # +9 `l' 1 YA€ I&NCE 88,13 - 20/20 RECYCLE CENTEr3 , A request to el mina e e rega,re oo Tands—ca�5— planter along the sides and rear and to eliminate the overhead trellis or arbor for a recycling facility located at 9477 Foothill Boulevard in the Community Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard Specific plan rt 37. 0H: 208- 25I -38 and I. ABSTRACT: A variance of the development standards for recycling k- f0sk"'Rns located an the southwest corner, of Foothill Boulevard and Malachite Avenue (Perry's Market). 1I. BACKGROUND: On November 4,, 1957, the Clty Council adopted VFdr l`narce . 327 in respons} to the state's ^.'option of the California Beverage Contsinee r vcling and Litter Act. The Purpose of this ordinance is to`,, -ovide "agulations and standards frr the review, construction and operatior: of recycling facilities. In le—,r dated July 21, 1988 (tee Exhibit W), 20/20 Recycle Canters applied for a varianco of the Developmert Standards for a kinsk bin recycling facility to: I) e'lminate the 3 foot landsccve planter on the sides and rear of the facility, and 2) eliminate the overhead trellis or arbor over the facility. III• ANALYSIS vas recycling facilities Developmeit Standards require recyc; "`* - cilities that are not 'located Lander a building canopy to conform to the following: 1. y'1e recycling facility stall be designed with a landscape °aianter at least 3 feet in width along the s {des an- re -At, ttf the recycling facility. 2. The recycling facility shall be desig ;;ed with is permanent enclg5ure or screciting, such as overhead trellis or arbor. 3. The rsc' ing facility s11411 be wetback at least S0 fee; frotr and street frontage. ITEM Q I '� o q __ o . 4-of 5 PLANNING CO44ISSION STAFF REPORT VA 86 -13 - 20/20 Recycle Centers September 14, 1988 Page 2 The purpose these is insure n facilit will be n integrated part ofthpcentE iwhicth recycling are located. These features serve to enhance the aesthetic appearance of the facility. These features also define the facility from the parking lot, mrking a distinction between vehicular and pedestrian traffic, thereby reducing possible traffic conflicts. In order to approve this variance request, certain findings in the affirmative must be made. Staff cannot make all the following findings: 1. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary ;physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. 2. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circums�u ces or conditions applicable to the property involved or ts- t.�e intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. 3. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcefm,��t of the specified regulation would deprive the applicLa cif privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. 4. That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. 5. That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental ,co the public health, safety, or 'welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. Me reasons cited by the applicant in the variance request (Exhibit A) challenge the Code Standards in general, but do not give specific justification for the site in question. - IV. CORRESPONDENCE: 'his item has been advertised in The Daily Re ort newspaper and -public hearig notices were sent to aFT proper Fs- within 300 feet of the subject site. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny is ari nce through adoption of the attached Resonation. If however, the Camanissioa determines that the proposal is acceptable, then direct staff to prepare a resolution with findings for PLANNING cowrm..,m STAFF 'REPORT VA 88 -13 - 20/20 recycle Centers September 14, 19pR Page 3 Resp 1iy submitted, Br er City P nner BB:CK:vc Attachments: Exhibit "N' ' Variance Request, July 21, 1988 Exhibit "B" Site Plan Exhibit '10 - Site Layout Exhibit " "O " - Kiosk Specifications Resolution of Denial J 20 RECYCLE CENTERS July 211 1988 Ms. Cynthia Kinser Assistant Planner CITY OF RANCFO CUCAMONGA P.O., Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Lear Ms. Kinser: — f Tvri V7.10 as b:11i pe ANOO Nc VIWs!oN ju'!, •`t" Enclosed are the documentation for.our request for a variance at our redemption centera in the following two markets: Perzy's Market, 9477 Foothill Blvd. Staters #78, 9750 Nineteenth street I would like to address our opposition tj the city's requiremen`: for the screening of our facilities. such a requirement poses an economic burden and impairs the viability of the project's intentions which is to bring about increased public awareness. The economic burden lies in the fact that these redemption centers have to operate sheerly on the basis of volume. The redemption to the consumer is one penny per beverage container and the scrap value is equally modest. Screening precludes the opportunity to ever be able to operate due to too high start up costs. We are currentl, evaluating a number of sites for closure due to excessive costs: thus never giving the recycling program a chance to prove itself. The success of the program will be based on high volumes and high volume is synonymous with visibility, We now have operated long enough to provide historical documentation which supports the belief that a site which is not highly visible will do very little volume. We need 900 pounds of aluminum per week to break even. Sites which are hidden do less than 100 pounds per week. We all recognize the strong need for recycling in the State of California. However, compromise is the only way we see of making this program work. We are more than willing to work . with the planning staff in finding a location within the shopping center parking lots which will be visible within the lot for the patrons of the markets, yet be exidden by possibly some already existing landscaping within, the lots or a spat within the lot that is not highly visible from the street. El Aff 'Joe, Caym, 90 60& mint c'iftria 91714 (714852.0777 � � �•�!f d' AOivisi000fcmto ANhry,t= ��i"� f C C t concerning Sunrize' market, Y spoke wiia .Zhe market owner, and also the attorney for the landlord (T Bandi), ,,m and have been ut:able to obtain liz.nd�ord approval. Therefore, we will be closing that snore. r f. k I am holding off on applying for the varia..4ae for Alb,ertsonve #661 until T obtain f a 3001 radiva ma ' and property listings. T have � Azo ert ownership Placed an order for. tht}ma and should receive them in a tree- or so. i fyil� then forward them on to you. Thank you for your cooperation it this matter. We look forward to working with in 5 f you finding a mutually satisfying location for both of our sites, ! If you have any questions, or need additional information, � please call me at (714) 352-0777. I Cordially f Barbara 3: Saperia Government Specialist Aft Ibis enc: i ll� I i I i i i I i i i HELMS •' S v° � i J� 5O ;r6. �s I, -M��UY • - -�. 1 c A f TO DO A LO. :a: &� •e9 � j i�i �: � EE t •i� pt E71n 51 61, CODE NO. 3591 Capacity: 3.5 Cubic Yards (Approximate) designed for one -ms. ,l operation MATERIAL Glass-fibre Reinforced Plastic (GRP) fittings in galvanized steel EXTERIOR: Self-coloured gelcoat BASIC VERSION: 2 drop-in holes/7: diameter N 1'0" 7' 2" Front View SIDE VIEW 1.0" I 4'0" Q`-1 6' 0" 20120 RECYCLE CENTERS' f KIOSK ELEVATIONS CONTACT: E. P. Hanrath (7 14) 852 -0777 5 0" SIDE VIEW 1.0" I 4'0" Q`-1 6' 0" 20120 RECYCLE CENTERS' f KIOSK ELEVATIONS CONTACT: E. P. Hanrath (7 14) 852 -0777 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION DENYING VARIANCE NO. 88 -13 A REQUEST FOR VARIANECE TO ELIMINATE THE 3 FOOT LANDSCAPE PLANTER ALONG THE SIDES AND fi °,AR AND TO ELIMINATE THE OVERHEAD TRELLIS OR ARBOR FOR A RECYCLING FACILITY LOCATED AT 9477 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 208- 261 -38 and 37. A. Recitals. (i) 20/20 Recycle Centers has filed an application for the issuance of the Variance No. 88 -13 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application ". NO On September 14, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All Yegal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Ask B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as ;ollows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the racts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on September 14, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together with publi: testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 9477 Foothill Boulevard for an irregular shaped parcel with a street frn-,tage of 200 feet and an average lot depth of 404 feet and is presently improved with a shopping center; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is single family homes and commercial, the property to the south of that site consists of a public storage facility, the property to the east is commercial and office, and the property to the west is commercial; and (c) The application has been submitted to allow the elimination of a 3 `oot landscape planter along the sides and rear of a recycling facility, contrary to the requirements of Section 17.04.080 of th% City of Rancho Cucamonga. Development Code; and ��rD PLANNING cowrSMN RESOLUTION No. VA 88 -13 - 20/20' Recycle Centers September 14, 1988 Page 2 elimination 0 an overhead trellis aorioarbora for a recycling facility ow the to the ,equirements of Section 17.04.080 Of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. contradict the obpecti es Of r the RanchospCa specified nga i Development opment iCode for would following reasons: (I) The intent is to have a recycling facility. that is designed in a manner that is consistent with the architecture and site Ai an of the associated commer,ial use; and ii That the facility be designed with a related permanent enclosure or screening; and That the recycling facility she-'. be designed to include safety provisions for separating pedestrian and vehicular traffic; and (iv) That the requested v� 'r2 ?4piication would not meet the of Section 17.04.080 of the City of Rancho CucamonS- Development Code. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing one upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would not result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsisten+ with the objectives of the Development Code. (b) That there are not exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. (c) That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would not deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. 0 'B A PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. VA 88 -13 20/20 Recy.le Centers September 14, 1988 Page 3 (d) That the granting of the Variance will constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. (e) That the granting of the Variance will be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or Improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this 'Omission hereby denied the application. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1988. PLANNIN; COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. e a rman ATTEST:_ —ara - 0—M-9 wdretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of September, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: ca':.ISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 'fir CIW OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 14, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Cynthia S. Kin-_,,, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: VARIANCE 88 -14 20120 RECYCLE CENTERS A request to eTimina�e a requ re oo an scope planter along the sides and -re,— and to eliminate the overhead trellis or arbor for a recycling facility located at 9750 Nineteenth Street in the Neighborhood Commercial District APN: 202- 171 -56. I. ABSTRACT: A variance of the development standards for recycling as ns located on the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Nineteenth Street (Stater Bros.). TI. BACKGROUND: On November 4, 1987, the City Council adopted r nand- o. 327 in response to the state's adoption of the California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Act. The purpose of this ordinance is to provide regulations and standards for the review, construction and operation of recycling facilities. On April 8, 1988, Recycling Facility Permit 88 -03 was approved with the conditions required by Ordinance No. 327 (see Exhibit "A "). In a letter dated April 18, j8, 20/20 Recycle Centers requested that the conditions of apprr A for Recycling Facility Permit 88 -03 be appealed to ��;te Planning .;ommiss3on (see Exhibit "B "), Nowever, the Development Standard: for recycling facilities ccnnot be appealed and the applicant was informed that the only recourse was to apply for a variance. In letter dated July 21, 1988 (see Exhibit "C"), 20/20 Recycle Centers applied for a variance of the Development Standards for a kiosk bin recycling facility to: 1) eliminate the 3 foot land,;,cape planter on the sides and rear of the facility, and 2) elimi'nat:a the overhead trellis or arbor over the facility. III. ANALYSIS: The recycling facilities Development. Standards require recyc n`g facilities that are not located under a buil.9ing canopy to cOIfOrm to the following: ITEM R PLANNING C0MMISS!ON STAFF REPORT VA 88 -14 - 20120 Recycle centers September 14, 1988 Page 2 11 I. The recycling facility shall be designed with a landscape Planter at l'-;t 3 feet in width along the sides and rear of the recycling facility. 2. be recycling facility shall be designed with a permanent enclosure or screening, such as overhead trellis or arbor. 3. The recycling facility shell be setback at least 50 feet from any street frontage. The purpose of these criteria is to insure that the recycling facilities will be an integrated part of the center in which they are located. These features serve to enhance the aesthetic appearance of the facility. These features also define the facility from the parking lot, making a distinction betweet vehicular and pedestrian traffic, thereby reducing possible traffic conflicts. In order to approve this variance request, certain findings in the affirmative must be made. Staff cannot make all the following findings: 1. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. 2. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. 3. That strict or literal interpretation and enfornement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. 4. lrnat the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. 5. That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The reasons cited by the applicant in the variance request (Exhibit C) challenge the Code Standards in general, but do not give specific justification for the site in question. PLANNING COMMISSMN STAFF REPORT VA 88 -I4 - 20/20 Recycle Centers September 24, 1988 Page 3 El IV'. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Dail Report newspaper and public hearing notices were sent to a Y properties within 300 feet of the subject site. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the PlaWi,,,g Commission deny this VaFriance through adoption of the attached Resolution. If however, the Commission determines that the proposal is acceptable, then direct staff to prepare a resolutio�t With findings fcr adoption at your next meeting. Reully submitted, ';P Cinne BB:CK :vc Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter of Approval, April 8, 1988 Exhibit "B" -, Letter of Appeal, April 18, 1988 Exhibit "C" - Variance Request, July 21, 1988 Exhibit "D" - Site Plan Exhibit "E" - Existing Layout Exhibit "F" - Kiosk Specificatioi,s Resolution of Denial ` I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA April 8, 1988 B.P. Nanrath 20/20 Uecycle Centers 18001 Cowan, Building "E" Irviae, CA 92714 Post D1Ree Box 807. Rancho Cucamonga, CaVania 91730. (714) 989-1831 SUBJECT: RECYCLING FACILITY PERMIT 88 -03 - STATER BROS KWET #78 Dear Mr. Nanrath: The process for ?`e above- described project has been successfully completed and approval has been granted b,3sda- upon the following , findings and conditionz. Thank you for your part ".,pation and cooperation during this review process. We sincerely hope that this process has been a positive experience for all involved, Findin A. That the proposed project is consistent with the Gene ,1 Plan. 8- That the proposed project is in acconJance with the Objectives of the Development Code the purpose of the district in whivh the site is located. C. That the proposed project together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the puLlic health, safety, or welfare or materially injuri-)us to properties or improvements in the vicin4ty, D. That the proposed project will comply with each of the applicable p "ovisions of the Development Codo. E. That the Recycling Facility is certified, or has applied to be certified, as a Recycling location pursuant to the California Beverage Container Recyclire; and Litter Reduction Act. E Conditions This project is approved subject to the following conditions: 1p 1. See attached site plan for approved location. ifj- Deborah N Bro%n Jeffrey King Denri, t Seoul Charles J. Bu uet I! ., Nmmgsr Q PamclaJ. Wright Laura., M. Wasserman; El &r.ycling Fa�il;ty - tater Bros. #478 April 8, '.988 Page 2 2. The Recycling Facility shall be designed with a related permanent enclosure or screening such as overhead trellis or arbor. Plans shall be submitted and approved ty. the City Planner prior to installation. 3. The Recycling Facility shall tie designed with a landscape planter at lersv three feet in width (inside dimension airing the sides and rear of the Recycling Facility. Plans shall be submitted and approve; by the City Planner prior to Installation. 4. Any signage required for a Recycling Facility shall apply for a sign permit and comply with the Sign Ordinance of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the approved uniforms sign program for the , associated commercial use. 5. If the operator's lecycling CertificaVe is ravoked or susper by the California Department of Conservation pursuant to the termer of the California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act, this permit shall be evoked. Please note that condition, may specify completion of certain plans or work prior to issuance of ouilding permits. This decision will t- -ft± final unless an appeal is filed within ten days from the date is 1 ter. The appeal must be filed with the Planning Commission v an writing, together with a $62.00 appeal fee If yorm should have any questions concerning specific conditions, please feel fee to contact Cynthia Kinser at 714 - 984 -1861. Sincerely *, COMMUKIX.,DEVELOPNENT OEPARTKENT PL OItlI7 r - /Br er --�` City P nrer 88 :CK:js Attachment_ Site Plan cc: Code Enfcrcement .NCHI9ALD•---.-_..__ _ BANK ti ( "J 1 �I r , i;, '''In y r i tyrf { 7s t t � ! •- A `' _ fill U01 r t_ r U0! � "r a ' z ? �= f Slices arou E Q SiAtfp 9ti0S, MK 1 NO ?a SIC OL.K - RE-CYCLE CENTERS 0 April- -18 -Ua City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road P.O.Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 To Wham It May Concern, This letter is to serve as :n appeal of the conditions placed on the permits granted sy the Planning Department to 30/20 Recyc?e Centers for the placement of two redemption . centers in the city of Rpsocho �;taaamonga. In particular, conditions 2 and 3 sited in both permits 88 -03 and 88 -01 form the need for this appeal. OuF reasons and subsequent requett for a variance from the City's recycling eentert guidelines are as foll6wi�.s 1. Trellis and additional landscaping islands would require difficult to obtain property owner's approval and farce encumbrances on the landlord's property. Landlords see the cente►-'s mobility as an advantage. The kiosk renders a clean permanent look; but such additional requirements then make the whole center appear zoo permanents therefore, jeopardizing the landlord approval. 2. It would be too permanent for another reason, in that A8202O is a sensitive political piece of legislation, one which is highly susceptible to change or repeal. Currently there is legislation in Sadramento which could limit the life of this program. Should the redemption centers by legislated out of existence, there would remain only the extra landscaping barriers simply consuming parking spaces. 3. We have already experienced cases in which planning approval was granted, s$,tes sip and operating, then due to unforeseen circumstances, they needed to be relocated. That would be at a substantial adoitional cost, or impossible with permanent facilities. In the case of the staff recommended site highlighted in the Albertson's plot plan, the landscaping would place the center into two parcels which could well cause the relocation of the center some time in the future. 4. Such permanent structures consume even more parking space, thus complicating tight parking situations. This vory problem was noted in my first meeting with Cynthia Kinser. 18001 Cowan, Building E, lwine, Cafifgm,a 92714 4 DNIVon of Conrain•A•Way, Ina 1714)W5'2.0777 l For these a variants s!rom reasons, we feel it is appropriate to ask the existing City for guidelines. Sites can identified by working closely with the staff to mitigate be the visual impact. availability of At the same . time, incrensed awareness to the convenient recycling opportunity should achieved in Rancho Cucamonga; be Flease let appeal me know what is to be my next %tap in this process. Sincerely:, B R P . Hanra'tts Manager, Government 41f fairs. 0 1 i C'. L ,J to �ECYC�E CENTERS July 21, 1988 Ms. Cynthia Kinser Assistant Planner CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamon3a, CA 91730 y(s -it M. ! VT V 1A!, :! u 1986 7 19AL111211121806 Dear Ms. Kinser: Enclosed are the documentation for our request for a variance at our redemption centers in the following two markets: Perry's Market, 9477 Foothill Blvd. staters #78, 9750 Nineteenth Street I would like to address our opposition to the city's Am requirement for the screening of our facilities. Such a requirement poses an economic burden and impairs the viability of the project's intention, which is to bring about increased public awareness. The economic burden lies in the fact that these redemption centers have to operate sheerly on the basis of volume. The redemption to the consumer is one penny per beverage container and the scrap value is equally modest. Screening precludes the opportunity to ever be able to operate due to too high start up costs. We are currently evaluating a number of sixes for closure due to excessive costs, thus never giving the recycling program a chance to prove itself. The success of the program will be based on h 2h volume, and high volume is synonymous with visibility. w-.. now have operated long enough to provide historical documentation which supports the belief that a site which is not highly visible will do very little volume. We need 900 pounds of aluminum per week to break even. Sites which are-hidden do less than 100 pounds per week. We all recognize the strong need for recycling in the State of California.. However, compromise is the only way we see of making this pr,---am work. We are more than willing to work with the planning staff in finding a location within the shopping center parking lots which will be visible within the lot for the patrons of the markets, yet be hidden by possibly f some already existing landscaping within the lot, or a spot within the lot that is not highly visible from the street. g� 18001 Cowan, huildiny & IM4 California 92714 17141 -0777 A Divison of Conlah -A -ft y, ft - � Concerninc i Sunrize Market, i spoke also the attarn.;v for the landord the market owner, and (Tom unabAe to obtain - landlord a ), and have been cl,osi;tg that approval. TbzErefore, store. we will be I am holding off on applying for the variance for Albertson's u »tit I obtain a 300' ist radius map and property ownership listings. I have placed, an.. order for them, receive them in and should you. a week or co. I will then forward them on to Thank you for your coop ®ration in this mat;' ;er.. We look forward to working with you location for both of our sites in finding a mutes ;lly satisfying If you have any questions, or need additional information, Please call me at (714) 852- 0777. Cordially � i etv�a�ggJU,,Ct,�? Barbara Saperia Government Specialist /bis enc: Auk i -�70 7 EROS, MKT �0. ............... d NORTH I CM O ITEM: 0 'CAI 'O.i4CT TITLE: l ou `_`i XRIEIT _f: SCALE: tl (16" N Elevations a' 6 k ( 3..0 Cubic t leters 4.0 Yards CODE NO. 3591 Capacity. 3.5 Cubic Yates (Approximate) designed for one -man operation MATERIAL; Ciassfibre Reinforced Piastic (CRP) fittings in lalv!;7tzed steel S(MRIOR, Self coloured gelcoat BASIC VERSION: 2 drop -in holes/7, diameter . I 1'0" 4-1► it 7'2" 712- Front View RECYCLE CENTERS SIDE VIEW 1'0" 4-#. i► 410,E 5' °" 61 01, "—N 20/20 RECYCLE CENTERS KIOSK ELEVATIONS CONTACT: B. P. Hanrath (714) 352 -0777 11 E E RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHU CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION DENYING VARIANCE NO. 88 -14 A REQUEST FOR VARIANCES TO ELIMINATE THE 3 FOOT LANDSCAPE PLANTER ALONG 'THE SIDES AND REAR AND TO ELIMINATE THE OVERHEAD TRELLIS OR ARBOR FUR A RECYCLING FACILITY LOCATED AT 9750 NINETEENTH STREET IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 202 - 171 -56. A. Recitals. (1) 20/20 Recycle Centers has filed an application for the issuance of the Variance No. 88 -14 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On September 14, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced put.'iic hearing on September 14, 1988, including written and oral staff zports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 9750 Nineteenth Street for an irregularly sh;-ed parcel with a street frontage of 80 feet and lot depth of 530 feet and is presently improved with a shopping center; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is vacant, the property to the south of that site consists of single family residential, the property to the east is an apartment complex, and thz prop_rty to the west is condominiums; and (c) The application has been submitted to allow the elimination of a 3 foot landscape planter along the sides and rear of a recycling facility, contrary to the requirements of Section 17.04.080 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code; and PLANNING CO!MSSION RLSOUrrioN Nn._ VA 88 -14 - 20/20 Recycle Centers September 14, 1988 Page 2 11 elimination of tan overhead The trellis on arbors for a recycling facility, contrary to the requirements of Section 17.04.080 of the City of Rancho allow Cucamonga Development Code. (e) The variance as specified in the application would contradict the objectives of th4 Rancho Cucamonga Development code for the following reasons: ( ) The intent is to have a recycling facility that is designed in a manner that is consistent with the architecture and site plan of the associated cOMercial use,: and (ii) That the facility be designed with a related permanent encg Sure or screening; and (iii) That the recycling facility shale be designed to include safety Provisions for separating pedestrian and vehicular traffic•, and Uv) that the requested variance application would not meet the intent of Section 17.04.080 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, 3. Based up-,in tht substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the r.. 's- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows; (a) That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would not result in practical difficulty or. unnecessary Physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code.. (b) That there are not exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. (c) That strict or. literal interpretation and enforcement f the specified regulation would not deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the f owners 0 other properties in the same district. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. VA 88 -14 - 20/20 Recycle Centers September 14, 1963 Page 3 0 (d) That the granting of the Variance will constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with limitations on other properties classified in the the same district. (e) That the granting of the Variarice will be detrimental to the public health, safety, or vIeTfare, or materially injurious a properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the findings and concluS *ohs set forth in paragrao 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby denies the application. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption Of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOHGA BY: arty . ef, a rman ATTEST: ra u er, Secre ary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission 0"" City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of September, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit; AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �- STAFF REPORT DATE: September 14, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Fk.A: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Cynthia S. Kinser, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: MINOR DEVELOPMENT kEVIEW 87 -71 - COMMERCIAi. CARP IERS, INC. appeal of e CondItions of pp -ova or Ine grading and paving of approximately 12 acres of land ftir an existing site within the Minimum Impact /Heavy Industri.�i Specific Plan (Subarea 9) located en the south side of Jersey Boulevard between Utica and Vincent Avenue - AM, 209143 -7, 8 & 9. I. ABSTRACT: An appeal of the Conditions of Approval for the grading an pay ng of approximately 1? acres of land on an existing ncn- conforming lot at 10807 Jersey Boulevard. II. E??'XGROUND: On November 19, 1987, the property owners filed t-nor e eSi cPme -ff Review 87 -71 requesting to grade and pave approximately 12 acres of land. The applicant proposes to pave the existing site which ia� utilized for truck parking and storage. On July ', 1988, the City Planner. reviewed and approved Minor Development Review 87 -71 subject to conditions (see Exhibit "A "). The Conditions of Approval and Standard Conditions were placed on the project in order w bring the legal non - conforming lot into conformance with the Cit. 's current Development Code. On July 18, 1988, the applicant requested that all of the Conditions of Approval be appealed to the Planning Comtaission (see Exhibit "B "). III. ANALYS'S: A. P1,innin Issues: The subject site consists of three legal parcels w c are currently improved with a single -story office bsi ding and a metal warehouse building (see Exhibit "D "). The remainder of the site is utilized for truck parking and storage. The site is enclosed by chain link fencing. The site's 820 feet of frontage along Jersey Boulevard currently has substandard parkway landscaping with parking beginning directly behind the parkway itrip. The Industrial Specific. Plan (Subarea 9) requires that properties fronting Jersey Boulevard have an average landscaping setback of 35 feet and a minirum 25 foot: parking setback, as measured from Tice of curb. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MDf 87 -71 — Commercial Carriers, Inc. September 14, 1988 Page 2 Further, the site is enclosed by chain link fence. The Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 9) requires that outdoor storage within 120 feet of a street frontage shall be screened. Storage area screening may include masonry, concrete, or other similar materials. Rather than deny the project for non - conformity, the City Planner approved the project subject to conditions requiring landscaping end parking improvements to meet Code Standards (seE Exhibit "A "). The applicant never applies# for variance from these Code requirements. B. En �inea�rin Issues: The site currently has four driveways w thir2O feeuoU-street frontage. roe City's access policy for arterial streets specifies that driveways on the same side of a street be spaced 300 feet apart. Therefore, two driveways would be allowed on this site. Further, left turn conflicts shall be minimized by positioning new driveways opposite existing driveways or by off - setting the centerlines by at least 235 feet. No driveway may be closer than 100 feet from the back to the curb return at an unsignalized intersection. There are, however, some existing limiting factor: (see Exhibit 1. There is an existing driveway five feet from the property line an the adjacent westerly property; and 2. There are two existing driveways on the north side of Jersey Boulevard; and 3. Red Oak Street ends in a "tee" intersection opposite the existing office building on the northeast corner of the subject site. In regards to the above conditions and constraints, both of the existing driveways foi• the existing structure in the northeast corner of the site are too close to the Red Oak Street intersection (see F ; -,ure E). The westerly of the two cannot be move: further west and maintain 300- foot spacing from the primary driveway. Moving 100 feet east of the intersection would work, if the access could be located off -site on the vacant property to the east. The City is willing to require a shared actress easement of the property to the east at such *ime as a development proposal is submitted for that site. If this developer wishles to obtain secondary access sooner, he will ANIL need to acquire -the Of -site easement privately. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Minor Development Review permit process is Inten eI. 'rf assure that such limited projects comply with all applicable City Standards and Ordinances... ". The City Planner=s FL-,hNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MDR 87 -71 - Comercial Carriers, Inc. Septemoer 14, 1488 Page; 3 E t authorized to impose reasonable conditic;ls upon an approval consistent with,, this purpose. Absent a variance request being approved by the Planning Cornisr?on, the City Planner could net have approved this permit request without the conditions ! approval because the requisite findings listed below could not have been made in the .affirmative: 1, That the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the proposed project is in accordance with the objectives of the Industrial Specific Plan, the lurpose of the district in which the site is loE«ated. 3. That the proposed project t6j,'kher with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfe.re or materially injurious to I properties or Improvements ;n the vicinity, 4. That the proposed project will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific. Plan. V. RECOMMODATIGN: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny j this appeal of the Condition^ of Approval for Minor Development Review 87 -71 through the adoption :,f the attached Resolution. If however, the Commission detarnines that the proposal is acceptable, then direct staff to prL:pare a resolution with findings for j adoption at your next meeting. l QResul ly tted,er nnex I BB :CKsvc Attachments: Exhibit "A" - getter of Approval Exhibit "B Letters of Appeal Exhibit "C" _,Lette- from Applicant Exhibit "D Siis Plan Exhibit "E" Drlve!+ay Constraints Resolution t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 7, 1988 Gabel, Cook & 82cklund 647 N. Main Street Suite 1 -8 Riverside, CA. 92501 SUBJECT: MIKOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -71 Dear Mr. Go klund Pon OTce Box 807. Rancho Cuumon 989.1g$! 8>:. CAiifomiA 91/0, 17141 � The Minor Development Review process for the above�doscribed project has been successfully completed and approval has been granted based upon the following findings and conditions. Thank you for your participation and cooperation during this reviews process. We sincerely hope that this process has been a positive experience for all involved, Fi ndf, ngs A. That the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. B. That the proposed project is in accordance with the objectives of the Industrial Specific Klan, the purpose of the district in which the site is located. C. That the proposed project together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. D. That the proposed project will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific plan. Conditions This project is approved subject to the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: Planning Division 1. Construct the following missing improvements along the entire street frontage: .Mawr Dennis L, Stout a. Streetscape landscaping at an average 35 foot setback from Gurbface and a minimum 25 foot parking setback from Gurbface. This will require removal of existing paved parking areas within the setback areas. L"peltevnErrA 5--(� A Detw*h N, Brown $effigy Kin` 0 me Chutes J. bhl uet if � 4 Patnelai,4Vright Lauren Ai.Wassennsn MINOR DEVELOP14ENT VIEW 87 -71 GABEL. COOK b BECKL.ND July 7, 1988 Page 2 b• A screen wall at the back of the streetscape landscaping —setback, to screen the storage area from view from the Public right :,f -way. Scre--fling shall be massonry, concrete or of,::r similar materials. 2. Due to the removal of existing parking areas for landscaping, new parkings areas shall be striped per city standards. Submit parking site plan within 90 days. 3. Parking lots shall be planted with 1 tree per 3 parking stalls and a 6 foot planter is required around the Fericcetjr. 4. Landscaping and irrigation plans, including screen wall design, shall be submitted and approved within 90 days. S. All improvements required by Conditions of Approval shall be Completed within 12 months. Engineering Enginterigg Divisian 1. A71 existing driveways shall be removed and replaced with curb and gutter. 2. A single driveway is allowed on this parcel. it shall align with the eastern most driveway on the north side of Jersey Boulevard and shall conform to City Standard No. 306. 3. If the developer wishes to obtain secondary access to this site, he shall negotiate shared access agreement(s) tith adjacent property owner(s). This decision shall be effective following a 10 -day apK-li period beginning with the date of this letter. If you should have any questions concerning specific conditions, please feel free to contact Cynthia S. Kinser at 714- 989 - 1861. Sincerely, CO MMUN DEVE ,4ENT DEPART PENT PL DI N rad Bui ty P1 nner BB:CK:nlg Attachments Standard Conditions 5-5- °,' A � a i _ f Poor or ` • yD yy U �LAT NM L NCYQ 4.G g.. e v �: r�$�� . •�� aY air_; ,, ;,;,�.. aiv'o.CCa�L�`L' E s`av�Y 8` gvg,« - 9Yr�a °` '.,a �',Z -i. Y t� y M POI :or °t�fs aafasg�A $D ;ark j �q(. +�ffi Ysi3wsa Ye�g� i ��yt o 11.a3 Y O. fN Oy NN.w d � aA Yf/ t' —. g « N�f gars s «r u • u�.ffi a: « N t7 • � � � �� • iPf N O O ° !g a MU5 eSi • � � fit` Y. s 1• s.�� S Ap b yY _�. O � iar Ola � `� O b �M. 040 «sYO.ria 4L r —C. .~ « V w.g v qi O y� e �. N.�' fs. fN. N.LY.- wy m a� V��- D`Q^° +• �.Yy� .c `°` +m rim .r$ S + =ate ^a viz I gz 2;bl 4i �V D• CII y Y'Y+ O�y y. -q.N. GV O� t =YY� y -�.+J! �Kr�i mes.1P =Np V yy YHYt �y°`y ym b q Lii 4 y� L z 1n2 "Yg ' °q .4 $ r Z zz ^@leis ai �y Z- BRI'J_t did ��LV Q j$$`•pV imR4.".S�/FSNyN�� =i ASRC•� w� wY �f`4j3 ?'q , :f' 8L �M�n v pv 7 iS� a - --a-ml .s ^Si. ,�"3 i.�." e AA LSII`N.Ngi� qY i. ¢¢¢� AA b A � p� of v g16p1Y�g+ $�.p�yY(• :• t- V iF�a a— b sa' ` -C_Ns� a •L.YL$ �issl�rlr�EE�a... iVS� V L�. -y O _OY Y�Y`6N � -6!t• �a +y9 SM Li �� q~ �a a s ffs 711P216 d: Qwm a •�� �� oa• r�L � X33 •� a� � AA ���� V i • r 3'z is - ay J. V �, r N Y s �N$ r• +�i� 4 W 75 _= A aNi° YM s �YY� CMVp:• C�r A M a1= 7 e r �Y 4- Yw..t�ei" �1•C •� VA� aY a0 S-; Q q. r Sq Yy ibi r. N V 8 V Cpp• q. �� 4Q�gM ;ry` (•yRio N�.� n► R. MLasLr ��a����� .a �YNmI yM ,nom <� ��4.. MNY.LC 'gr Yy3��►w 4MN ,x S�.�y 3,,.y H�Lp pyb�. CC ^Q 4 • t °ate tYi�.a �Mq 'VwA T v• &.5 V aM��N ..g ^N ar $ a � i . tf{,°. M s 4p"oj /tom �``C6i NtlNii v`v�•L M N • " a wd� w yai sav Y 4 V C 4 �C 4�yyK og��'ot r `+ A gY.; b y Y ` M Na� Yy p ° _SS R;y - U ' Vji r- as I;, 41-ai ?- Ij i :�cf r yy �Y` 4OO i NV- V O p L p w Q r.. .C, 11 11 0 ot%'iria8 poor atiOty I +aci YS Gip U52 44 a e YL � V Y' N Y 4 y `G� N� q - i CyV Y M Y 1 - D. C V 7 u ' V s 4 � 4 F s- t ; n+ Y � g }I. . y a0� _i O. C. `t O N r � T - a Y � C l - a 2 v as NS qY� � � Y a4 7 era j§F �yV C L y � Q 1 Y � Y 4 t � L e j: N aY a M Y M i Y N G Y u M N a as - C . w ° Y 40,4iftgna to -•S C�� V� -O y� oV V 4 N M S iH p�+yyqq r� 1rYad �N NO' ^- �._r`�' ?gin `z.Lg _ yy1. 4p4 cs�i-_q o�O lM� u m _6 yN aO Y -:C4r a.e MOG.w� 20" i • - a O e _X s"a� r S V 6C_x all- V x_ ILC p - C_ M C - i11s u 0 Rv i A� S� a3 4 u V d a p � StiM�' r L r ,2 .3 x May vyy 4w�e4� s 3�� 3 L C 0 3�a hoc oz � `� 4 sa3 e u Y B'5y1 � V q G 4 3 :m38 Yyw cc 3' C v_ a tail L 'OO V 6 •^ N sa mo �1 r 0! Y N_N i z k NaN. CL g °V 01� x � 1 ®yTY P Y y G t�s - "`1 y 4 N s rc Pi° M a�u2 YN D Lrt��Q Y Y .pZ 2Jilin N ,Yo1 t d0 f° V C Q. fw NQ °�4 NppC 44�� L L D 1►O .np ' 6 ,e VS .L YiVy w4a y °�L�� a ii ODx.� q` yyO LS NO Y p _ ° f CeyiY L' ��+ O� Mny1Y EO ^YLti t N .YY� NY1 L • �ci tlG�/ Mx I +aci YS Gip U52 44 a e YL � V Y' N Y 4 y `G� N� q - i CyV Y M Y 1 - D. C V 7 u ' V s 4 � 4 F s- t ; n+ Y � g }I. . y a0� _i O. C. `t O N r � T - a Y � C l - a 2 v as NS qY� � � Y a4 7 era j§F �yV C L y � Q 1 Y � Y 4 t � L e j: N aY a M Y M i Y N G Y u M N a as - C . w ° Y 40,4iftgna to -•S C�� V� -O y� oV V 4 N M S iH p�+yyqq r� 1rYad �N NO' ^- �._r`�' ?gin `z.Lg _ yy1. 4p4 cs�i-_q o�O lM� u m _6 yN aO Y -:C4r a.e MOG.w� 20" i • - a O e _X s"a� r S V 6C_x all- V x_ ILC p - C_ M C - i11s u 0 Rv i A� S� a3 4 u V d a p � StiM�' r L r ,2 .3 x May vyy 4w�e4� s 3�� 3 L C 0 3�a hoc oz � `� 4 sa3 e u Y B'5y1 � V q G 4 3 :m38 Yyw cc 3' C v_ a tail L 'OO V 6 •^ N sa mo �1 r 0! Y N_N i z k NaN. CL g °V 01� x � 1 ®yTY P Y y G t�s - "`1 y 4 N s rc Pi° M a�u2 YN D Lrt��Q Y Y .pZ 2Jilin N ,Yo1 t d0 f° V C Q. fw NQ °�4 NppC 44�� L YY�O{�{�4 IvL Y j V�Cp.Y C -. A. 0 �p bEqba. 3 W 39uo Wes. °r {r rc oM gl�+ YqL Brg Yg Ycr�� Ye�� L�ro.i �Y. • C` Oy u0O ��••3 6 �u1 ^aVoa >22 N_Y C�S e�. O»4 aY16 � ■ Y?v Luci 3iw`pN��YA= !If 2;E v »v �5% _gv Mon .2 °r a �3 j a • i ,"ib:i g N. « -� YY a. a ° g "� Ia f4ey1 4■ ` br=8 :6i••_tG M M tV» O6V`¢12 GN • y N€ �� ��j jo� � �y US4 "—T Yp' N �b �.Nyt>•IY —all ti r. • 1 n � t ` `s M� •H� as YC ET a agg a y e Y_ .t E 2 ` Z (�1 OC Yip O rr a r S fix -1 g_y_ LD S GYY Y � � 'O ' yo �y > O� � Y° w 3Y ■Ni y Yno� f pN ' ! t �N^YLt • µy �r� `r tlI4 0113 N e» tlw NZ 4Y «� � °q 1 Q° LWO LI ..Mt •� L =O♦! =p a �CyyY° y 1 vN `Y Y � ` it IL ' o «e� � fa Y` C° V Y °j .0 AT te L � w4�CA C—.OwM Q9. CG Y r L ��q 4 L MOO�� lrwo b_0 Cw C 3u�i 6C ±= 7!w `.IL T6� GVN.. u ytr �i7 t•'uru "�S _ l p C �s''S oiler LY6 c �i 8 w S iig �`o a. w s sryiL w &3 2 � y �3 a »LO I#i � � 93 � � � V C Y■ a C N.. L Hi CO ss _ °� »OP e � M ��S�LSL � M _Y. N QJQ sl to. i y - � N 1 RIM e s LYU�Y c gc b6� `s p�q�� SAS a�ZY'�ett Wz la Y � y -O Qc �° sr. ���a •.� �r.��� �'® � � g 'r= �� `4,• r.� aY. iN� 4�S.N ~a'p� M1gy O�i a& fie � V•` L,d 3 tlY C i$ i �• wwO eL �.�t0� y ^ � e�O � L »Y y. �� �� =■ �Y lI1,: `O, O Y.� e+ � ��Y a CLy.. YOM'^ C-. ^a. C'N•o L qtr O t N 3. °ey L 'wit At �Y aN o30Y y „dNg TZ 6 �rcnc Q�qd yYyy mM Y C Q O Y {. U M . Ye e O w va o'riieu Jt'm ► go ar�� i o N ..j Y 9•�VyY pVUy Y.�` .� � �fGGI�' r Y U N$_Y r Ntl w^ W 25 Y ►w � ay � Y`fy.D a C G 0.- Oro $ Y$ M SEM oe L''s 2-53! 5t_`',e xs L- Z U Y ¢ C �\.� tY e.°. F! • •p �L � A nom.• .mow I 7 1 i o }! u d p �e . W p p V � y � � N C� Y i i s rg' C Of YY l W O 4 ^ v 4Y C Y t�L ti� 4a � 1 ' V y V wit 3.; � � r g» gtE 8 r ¢v 6 C_1V es 4.1 w 9 w �t »i t i� e� "s =Y e C Y e j » sh �� g Fix 8� i »y N• r L O; N b y 1 b - h L� 1 �J VV tl_ ' r O` _ . �2� em co :S L < Z » Mw` }rS Q@QQ �`� mow+ �` ry =L�'Ve •yyyR.. s " ' gS - p�Yy ZZ 6 t iL L Y O O M .r-_Y 6 N I■ Y Y bp�Ys 'C 0 0 C a1� yyLyy f - U. p$� aI _Os L1 I b OvLC' ytly COICO • -, y. NV� L a Mi. -C ry'7' �G- C i 2 a �J w�4• 4 � w V yM _O 1 a w 1 � Y W O Os� � vru�' t _V Y > Y p w p 4 4 V L W • � N y �spq �N �i4s I w N� 9 , a; IV 4 s 2 a a � s 1 r r � r f • M y N .fat .• O q L H O� all i L V tW �� v < o; 3 Y ea•. O Y � O w M ys 4# u Yy aar p`� V pO. Co6L �y �3ir' V et V ti b x46 LW s E wo 4 �c e bw ;.Y V N v 1 �r H V 3 �yaZ t�3 N O V > "s w.� bOgq O.i Al: `si�M. raV Y cad � i O gillO O W V ` E& 4F o $ W l � M ° 6` °.-Z .. 4 �$ a q N 4 L�v� �a yyqa >•N y ? t{yi 1x i�� ��6 qO ♦+y L ^M • W •�.� ti aa±rY ma=yy r y`yt y IM Mb1 ■ S _ c e 40�a ,V. ii �a 4 t CL 6 Y a tr� .CCO_v ` 91 4d W �Mti =5. Cot 4rrl w�4• 4 � w V yM _O 1 a w 1 � Y W O Os� � vru�' t _V Y > Y p w p 4 4 V L W • � N y �spq �N �i4s I w N� 9 , a; IV 4 s 2 a a � s 1 r r � r f • M y N .fat .• O q L H O� all i L V tW �� v < o; n C V i ys p`� ti b V V U3 Y s E Q a 4 y L bw ws� O N O V 3� Q "s w.� bOgq O.i `si�M. raV Y r 7 V � gillO V ` V o $ ti M n '""ABEL, COOK-& BECKLUNV Civil Engineering • Surveying a Structures a Environmental • Planning 18 July 1988 city of Rancho Cucamonga Post office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attn: Cynthia S. Kinser Re: Minor Development Review 87 -71 Dear Ms. Kinser, We wish to appeal all of the Conditions of Approval for this project and have enclosed the appeal fee of $62.00, Due to the issues involved in appealing this review, I would request that a meeting be arranged during the week of August 8th to 12th to discuss with staff these conditions, rather than attempting to cover all of these issues in a letter. if you have any questions or require additional information, please contact this office. Respectfully, Gabel, Cook & Becklund, Inc. Grant Recklund Civil Engineer Enclosure -5-1q MEMO TO FILE Record of: Dace �3d8 Meting _L/ Proj. Desc. .a Conversation 7/ / -- ,e.:_...•�_ Phone tvo.���.�� f`' Time Name: Representing: E1T -� vsJL7 r 4Z --27415 t3.c1a /T .tSsG' �'v,�rZ�l9 /ate' �.�- �.�,, _ .�. �.✓� j S` ;i PRwEw r�s CA t � i f `�' �^ 5701ZAGE --• � 4KEA NORTH P ,L n, -- CITY OF ITEM: MD( 8 7 . q h 'I PLANNING DIVISION 5 -1( EXHIEIT:. SCALE NMI 11 { '1 42 a Ae&M ,A y ZZ n � .Dafv= � AdIRL 1p .o ► -�1 wivew4y f - � GdCA770 J LT a w - ^r c t � s a sr.t r , �asr • � aar+- � � , N4 p�lly� at a 4�~ ` ^• 1 i RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA F,.ANNING COMMISSION DENYING AN APPEAL OF MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 87 -71, LOCATED AT 10807 JERSEY BOULEVARD IN THE MINI;W, IMPACTMEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 9) OF THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN, ffiM MAKING FINDINGS IR SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209 - 143 -7, 8, AND 9. A. Recitals -. (i) Commercial Carriers, Inc. has filed an application for the approval of Minor Development Review No. 87 -71 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in `ftis Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "tT'-e application Cucamonga( reviewed and approvedithe application subject ubject the sf on that date. (iii) Ca the of of the City of Rancho Cucamonga 14th mee ing8,on the appeal arid concluded said meeting on that date. (iv) All lepil prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, TNEREF�RE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: l i Commission hereby specifically orrectset forth in the Recitals, Part A o this Resolution are true and . 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting or, September 14, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 10807 Jersey Boulevard, an irregularly shaped parcel with a street frontage of :814 feet and an average lot depth eF 673 feet and is presently improved with an office, warehouse, and parking iot; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is a multi tenant industrial pars, the property to the south of that site consists of warehouse, the property to the east is vacant, and the property to the west is warehouse; and (c) The application applies to a site that is currently improved with an office building, warehouse !,uilding and parking lot and is considered a legal non - conforming lot; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. MDR 87 -71 - Commercial Carriers, Inc. September 14, 1988 Page 2 (d) Municipal Code Section 17.06.023.6 authorizes the City Planner to impose reasonable conditions upon a Minor G_,elopment Review permit . approval, including requirements for landscaping, street improvements, regulrtion of vehicular ingress, egress and traffic ci,- culation establishment of aevelopment schedules or time limits for performance or completion. (e) Municipal Code Section 17,.06.020.A states that the purpose and intent of the Minor Development Review permit process is to assure that l such limited projects comply with all applicable City Standards anO l Ordinances. (f) The lan application, does not meet thetIndustrialuSpecific Plancstandardoof a�35 foot average landscape setback and minimum 25 foot parking setback, as measured from the ultimate face of curb. Fyrther, the site plan and existing chain link fence improvements do not meet the Industrial Specific Plan standards for sr etaing outdoor storage of vehicles within 120 feet of;: street frontage with masonry, concrete or other similar materials. (g) The site currently is improved with four driveways within 820 feet of stree~_ frontage. `The City's access policy for arterial streets specifies that driveways on the same side of a street be spaced 300 feet apart. Therefore, only two driveways would be allowed on this site. Further, driveways should align Stith driveways on the opposite side.'of the street or by off - setting a. safe distance to avoid conflicting left -turn movements. The City's access policy also requires the access be located a minimum 100 feet from intersections. (h) The applicant has not filed any application for variance from the Industrial Specific Platt Standards and requirements. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Comnission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed project is not consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and (b) That the proposed use is not in accord with the objective of the Industrial Specific Plan and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and (c) That the proposed use is not in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESr,- ;OTION NO, MDR 87 -71 - Commercial; arrfers, Inc. September 14, 1488 Page 3 (d) That the proposes use, toytther with the conditions appi3cable thereto Y_. will be detrimental to the iublic health, s'fety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set,fIorth in paragraph 1, 2 and,3 above, this Commission hereby denies the application. �. 5. The Secretary to this j�ommissiom,,shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. ' APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 141711 DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1988, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGli BY: Larry ie , Chairman j ATE EST: Brad Buller, Secretary 1, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of tho City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing_ Resolution was duly and regularl;;- introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 4t a agular meeting of the Plannlrg Commissioa :geld on the 14th day of September, .dW. by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: commiSSIONERS: 1 -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 14, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Manning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, Cit',:91anner B'' Arett Horner, A si sU =at Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -24 DICKER- WARMINGTON - The design review of elevations an e a e s e p an o a proposed retail satellite building tuta"In 5,807 square feet within a 15.3 acre approved shopping .canter, in a Neighborhood Commercial District of the Terra Vista ,Manned Cortmunity, located at the northeast corner of Base line Road and Haven Avenue - APN: 202 - 801 -35. I. PRO_ ECT A,N1 SITE DESCRIPTION: ti Action ite ester Approval of the detailed site plan and e ed 4 W,i5. B. Surroundin Land U:e_and Zanin � h-73 ca. -, cen er, s ogle- family residences, Medium Density Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) South - Vacant, single- family residences, Medium Uensity Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) East - Single Roily residences; Medium Density Residential West Single-family residences; Low Density Residential (2- 4 dwelling units per acre) C. General Plan Dcsi W,.ins: •o ea s� -�od Commercial District North - Medium Density Residential South Medium Density Residential East - Medium Density Residential West - Medium Density Residential D. Site Characteristics: The buildin. le site is vacant and slopes genera y Nom north to south.. Vegetation consists of native grass. ,s ITEM T PLMNING COMMIssION STAFF REPORT OR 88 -24 - Dicker- Warmington September 14, 1988' Page 2 F. Parking Calculations: Type of Use Retail Shop Restaurant Totals II. ANALYSIS: Square Parking Fot,tage Ratio 2,012 1/250 3,795 1/100 Number of Number of Spaces Spaces Required Provided 8 8 38 38 4F -a A. General: The project site is located within the approved Terra ZV s0a— Village shopping center, as shown in Exhibit "4 ". The portion of the shopping center has been completed. Currently, three of the six.aetellite retail pads are under construction. The proposed site plan and the elevations are consistent with the approved shopping center. B. Design Review Committee: The Committee (McNiel, Buller) on A�gust 4, 1988 rev ewe the proposed project and recommended approval with the following conditions:. Pad "D ": 1. Landscape planters should be added to the storefront and should be designed to match the sto;,efrcnt planter areas which exist in the otr;rr areas of the Terra Vista Village shopping center, 2. The design of the paving area adjacent to the existing plaza should be revised to better interface with znd match the existing paving area to the northwest. Note: On September 8, 1988 the Committee reviewed and approved the revised plans which addressed the above concerns. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The proposed project is consistent with the objectives off—the General Plan and the Terra Vista Planned Community. The proposed ve, building design, site p;an, together pith the recommended conditions of approval, are in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Terra Vista Punned Community. The proposed use, together with the �nditions applicable the „to, will i:at he detrimental to the rrublic, health, or welfare or materially injurious to properties improvements in the vii pity. El r 4 �r PLANNING Cui=riISSION STAFF ;APORT DR 88 -24 - Dicker- Wamington September 14, 1888 Page 3 Iv. RECOWENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning commission approve eve op -ment Review 88 -24. Resagr4ully itted, Bra 1 Cit Planner BB:BN:vc Attacitments: Exhibit "A" - Location•Map Exhibit "B° - Approver, Master Plan Exhibit "Cu - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Conceptual Landscape Plan e' Exhibit "E" - Elevations Resolution of Approval with Standard Conditions .i ) I SITE NORTH CITY OF ITEM.- --_DR 40 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: .LQCL&i0ll MA PLANNING DIVISION � q XHiBIT.—.A-- SCALE: -!one 11 SITE NORTH ITVV: 11-68-2,4 TZTLE:, --&APPROVE SITF pL!�N EXHIBIT: SCALR., r , � i p i. Lr eh& eau Sao _ G REP)OLUrION NO. A RESOLUTION OF ThC RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT PEViEW N0. 8E -24 LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND HAVEN AVENUE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT - iPN: 202401 -26, 27. A. Recitals. Development)Review klio, 8g 24 kas described' in application title f f�jr the this Resolution• Hureinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development ',eview request is referred to as "the application ". (!I) On the 14th day of September, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on th-P application and concluded said meeting on that date. (tit) Ali legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho C,;camonga -as follows: set forthlin �,,heiRe to s S Part A hereby this Resolution %at all true of the 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to thi; Commission during the above- referenced meeting on September 14, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Base Line Road with a street frontaaQ of 860 feet and lot depth Of 8555 feet and is presently improv_Pi:I, and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is a child care center and single family residential, the property to the south of that site consists of vacant land and single family residential, the property to the east is single family residential, and the property to the *west ft single family residential, 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Comnissfomi during the above - referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan, and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. OR 88 -24 - 'Dicker- Warmington September 14, 1988 Page 2 (b) That the proposed use is in accord with the Objectives of the Development Code and the Terra Vista Communi'cy Plan; and (c) That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and (d) That the proposed use,, together with the conditions applAcable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed ar,l considered ir compliance with the California. Envirolmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission granted a Negative 0claration on August 13, 1986. 5. Based 1, 2 and 3 above, this nCOMi sic hereby approves the appiic io�l subjectato each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and inzorporated herein by thus reference.. Planning Division (1) A1T pertinent Conditions of Approvi,t contained in Planning Commission Resolution 86 -119 shall apply. (2) The site shall to develooed and maintained 4n accordance witit the approved site plan, chic includes architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping and grading on file with the Planning Division the conditions contained therein and the Development Cade regulations. Building & Safe - Division (1) All drainage and site layout shall conform to the approved conceptual grading plan for CUP 86 -05. (2) Detailed grading plan shnwing the perimeter and the limits of required on -site improvements such as sufficient improvements to es'.a'blish drainage and traffic circulation, shall be submitted for plan check prior to issuance of grading pe —tit. (3) On -site stores drain shall be installed and functioning prior to release of building occupancy, i� 9 .r 19 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. OR 88 -24 - Dicker- Warmington September 14, '988 Page 3 (4) Detailed cress sections at all site bouncaoies fo.- Pad "D" shall be provided for plan check. Engineering Division (1) Conditions of Appr,�val for CUP 86 -05 as containe,; in Planning ^ocmnission Resolution No. P6 -119 sh4l apply. (2) Notice of intention to form acid /or' join the lighting' and landscaping distr{ct shall be filed with the City Council prior to recordation of the map or building permit issuanci >, whiehever occurs first. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certi`y, to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 1411H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1988, PLANNING, COMMISSION OF 1111C CITY OF RAKCP0 CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. e , Chairman ATTEST; Brad Buller, cre any i, Brad Eullrr, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution wa;; duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by t�ie Plannirg Coniniss, +on of the City of Rane'so Cuca,asnga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commissinn held on the 14W., Gay of September, 1988, by the following rote- to4it: AYES: COt4M SS104ERS: j NOES: COMMISSIONERS: _ J ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: N x. v LU 9 fi WOW, Poor Qu-c qty . hG CCON ^'C CYpuT w�l`. L� CI D� N Y O V L ^° C �. � A a 9{. � V O' •� O a C p Np t Cl Yy'tt MlY���Dd �YM4. 44 9Q C q y'^ 'v X90. AY. -Y}p9 C L G Yy��..M 6��tl� pqe. �NrgG SON C��.i aP^°i. M •O N Y qG/. Ny M.^ w C of $. IL T`'s'9 Y� iur6. t �%� e`2. iao cAU "o « �a�" °L�N��oy �9 .'iY'�q W. N•°►� e.`$yea. °° pQ6 ~Qy,i^ aYYOG og.Y.m a.6.Nwj�� ��s�A 4�0 � ®�wc .��.•i�' Y�Y,�.�" A Y.y±iOML QO �Yi L4°VC4�'�6V -. CyC 6l GL _� C O L CK i G RU, V I J --I C nv a fLJ �.L�NtYI�S OM 9'r`W aJ NOS �ptY W wl..0 Ca LC •N gNYH 4.N tl 45. TYYN Yei Ny «CO y6Y 3s 12-1 ^d e s iC.. Y. NAM �iN ijl .lVY Wes'® A9 l4N YY Y`av''B YYV g$6 CAY.W. YV.ag$o NC64g 'pW CwC a0�0 �p}Y> O _66o ^qY ^O�/ S O Nom. ^6•� N.O. NYN �N 9W�6 QC �7M 62y gOMLN Sw Y�CL�q SGGT. C}I drW w..L N{q�gY� p:� NM'CQM O O+CI N O; Y 4 NM Y.aa G O N� C ��at °4) 4 �D W Y 11 N 2 W $ N o � pp a Q `2S 14 o J ?) a i�7 �N CN 00 lu �2G % 0 Y a N •� y A a 8�p � A a a. i• B. « o ♦ t t a �c'l � � LL ��C•f`NyjG�gli S li tv- f Rn 004 u °cpT3 la '610 «.-a qq°Y�ac A rY.r oui 6 0.46 LYLQ C Y y V O w.. N v. ✓ Y OI Y Yp$ 6^ w Cqq ;M_ NL �4. q�`Naaf^ M t6N9G ~✓~ N �9p Lw Q■ �6�N 4 yY PPP... LY-O OH SCq L^ � JW.aN� �� Y�O tICY� O�Owg�Yp ggQCC�Y�A L�.w 9 M aS. �.s 25��'4�°NO �n° ■` >„°. Aeg .°affiq GLV {��j yy Y� p L L✓ L Cw tGL N-L��. w0. e M 6 >�q ?rT Y L ✓. 6Li6Li ✓al ^W cos~ an yi Lv� f �y i;w^. �N C� Ni L Nj ]1� N ace �J. aa.- Z' ,ra !- ✓ . a � C Y. � Y Kl y L Y om✓ ✓CC M yN�: W. a O w eL ti Y W~ % ma y tJ" A O V' S a OCC pp��MOy�gj fw.L Gy� M O 'L GYO O�YV � +� E RAY aq 'Y qCO yyCN LOa E -S Lam. - a•�.�1Nfl. Ny� »�N �y i� a� ■ T N ✓ ` yy ✓ O YYN11TO ��✓C✓✓qL Cld- a ^ a rn V y V) 9 Y N a C^ rtLl ppap��O^y �OCOSi Y9.� .p.N'0 i3 N✓r��OY..Q TVY as qH a9 CO a� N✓.� • ^� r.e LY EGGG �C✓NNY�� q�91�1 ^G N Yq a�r� Cq^ agY.s✓a3.>��� Yj�a csuo �^i. = c° Toc OgaW Hill M. O N 7'O' R. CCq RL• N��^LF•eNe psi = M YYY 9 dC O O y q> LC>ta pY4CV Vy✓ y Yy�O C G?TyM1�•9�y �i }�.B{O1M � Lglax as g� Yd f T�O�G' 01L✓ 6 -5. ��..YQ [�1 pC 'i �'s'. p TTyy.. i� bC p33 L cy p4e yyNCNe✓Y�rYYa n �b°MNSi WCrEC QL78C Nd@C S✓di .NYY- Vi✓a N LTA w YS v lat L1 b 4 C V 9 ✓ nx a. Z, p uc Y Y r✓y? f.0' .'CY C4Cn LN C�OnY ✓ M � L I/.,9 C M bO ^Q 9Y Yp6 NM � `U AGO w ffii a V C N q W O p OICNN Na YNN C q-3 Y 6. 9. 0 ✓ T ^. ;.a ✓ O � O N ✓ Y(`ILtO M^ ae. ^y fra yy��CV CW,� YM� .27 K L M IL e s� G q IiM a -. .= Y ^ N y�� C V NC tC�. 4 pq ty Lq C 00.Y Y A e Y _ O � ww alit W ✓ b•' qV N T. °y m0� �yh+ Er �..TMC L OFY 'i aaLee Y Z c��y w✓Y ii� P yO LO NEy Q1� C O s n y Yy ^ J O ^dq w t�ve.�. a d -;I a, =8. Y L L V w {y �- Y 3-C ae w yau. a - 13 L1 M�+�g® UiIU Oa C4 ■C ✓..7t 4ii C(LN Pv q(`.� aa+L MMy �a'va� cr Y HCYHL v�FJyt Hra D OP�j�Y p d 0 UCC ✓Y y LS.�yM� � � ace. O i $. ✓ a awiN °�aL� C��vYa$ a C'C Y✓� q qyu�..> HwN�gC N mQwi V �CCgC .�pag0� .Q q� YO. Y VAN « bt•N N YN O J4 a4rm 9�0 U. .. Nfl w L p.L LL d 4 6AI d Y N d y lO. J� U 0 11 Original Poor OUB ty .,cu pig Nagd oo.Z U O. ° N ~ y�y q � _�� �� q O � U ° ~ f. C � p� V C �.. • C V C 8 gL�wa° e~ Qa ow as .- �Y,YCnfhc4u°,Nd ^lu�v'+ qQS� °Y T q :: � Lu v4 L:L ..i LOq• Y ���AN _ _O YaC H w � c qm oW. �•..�qw •..o uw$. .L_. �'t u ^w � n�.cS umgat Si vm• .. y !L ecsw" Yepa v� Yom.. T,r eY°var�N coyu�V Y•�Y�c aq L�'a � $pONV.a yY. Y, ..•y LN �p'4• ^ �yyM y ON S u q1G � FI! pD O CaC t� gIS/OG Y� �i1 a08 �LG VT1 ■ ■LO p =q �l yyv1�L ' F �v 9 41s. p, V. Q. yq�e C« Vt�K 'y�l•I YY VVNN +q yyV �w� 1VN W GN,LOq ry GM Cq Y Nq N •y Yjt QO1 N N N�.B _adi 4nyCLV °N4���py6py.�N� RLO �v yy� �Li� s'fyvc�Y'tsNN� Qn 3yi «r ~4« � � �� _c .r•,,GGY°' �' =Pg .o�i`P UC'NU�C��a�c _$p- U^YYY GNY C.,. yUAL Vu`S`'' NOQ(ytQG�.VU NC� C 4 ~b L N L Q O .21 4N KN�. KN =MO. l�NL PG'�gLY ^/P G OdO�Q <N ♦Y,Pr Oti Ol tlN �0 i Or.. i C Y {Li.O7 CN g c .yy 4 rs•ys sa. C is hn.Y. V Lq..M q'ww 00. 4 G L e)CC� 0�aa Maq �' L'"tnw �w'pp Nac4 ■ .Lit NL't� 6.p 'G°'` �.,.9 ry d Y6 d ?^ 6 y Y L 6. °!'o L wy C tC N L 4 ..if O C� L�t ro °t`yOH Q.70.; w tl �" '• P 1`. CCi r a� _ Y L 9�_O 'C aAa qi O M fDa q�Y jN ids YV O1U $ � . -o' ^ C �q� w NG N • �y�•• O�UC �C. q Q�YA YiYY �� �C p• gC� M Gq� q G U t{1 y M Y =@ eYy g�0 qNM CNUM ^O A^ C .ate QL `h 15 .:� �iw�ny N� +CYtN we uu N {Y� 3 «q G y r. �C,P G^ yY` Y `.+•OO N Y JL ayQ cL"U'p V OH • N Q® OV'� Pt\ 'VLVq. Yy: =OOt V. w Lg M. Yom• L � p6� q 4 G' atNsq M � Yr°• y° aa'N ��n f 6r b Y _ q ^..N cq aS tCU'Y NGGiY O Y NN ,q� 97 N N O qGi V try CYYt O = N L ^ C NO OGPQa+ Od VO 4 GG C cvi 6 M' qG - +� q yy p�'.�G b^ NQy q O. G i a� L r.. q r O 0 G {. V w N L 3 C dd a yy 'C.CC ilwm K7W HO. 4G !.d tL �6M «v iC6 KN• W Cr3 ti: r°VO. 0 Q S I-• L61 V �i a Vul11 LL 11 d Pact piiw.+Y, kt 1� N ^I i 1 � ID •1 C O Y 4 4 y�6 `e4 av � V Y �C r > L ' Y d a p, �^ 4 N y n tia P ^a 4 «.a V ^ 0 Y va. 0$Y+ yuuy 4 .� VC�plI jC .« uY 4� '�f fVY. boa Y 6a. v ^� °w. �RYG• C St y.�YO L La VjOy IR rQ, L d 4 C ag, 2 ia Ev ys °crN. 4HN Y L OCIr Yw�yN T dO.yG9 1fV� age 1 C� aCLN YyyO ~ Vl ^L Via g�� yY �:12 4t.. D aucu q ..2 j� pe yc g Y y O C i °C� A C4 Y N �� yG� YJ�C' I• N 4° ^ N '. O N�LGj� Mj14 wl°F LiN '�YJ. w�N.CL io aq i,'1 G U d^ � N u "• Y Y� U y Y� 'q G^ Y Viiau. nC -L y. ..VyGC m V x A Y V 1� N ^I i 1 � ID •1 C O Y 4 4 y�6 `e4 av � V Y �C r > L ' Y d a p, �^ 4 N y n tia P ^a Ol^ Y0 L Y 0$Y+ yuuy 4 .� VC�plI jC .« uY 4� '�f fVY. boa y'Ry � °°LY y° 00 G l.,lpY G> W� r. VjOy IR CN Yee y ag, 4HN Y 4 4 =: ar Yw�yN ,GU� •ryJC�I. q�iW �m y ,r,^ mC a YA 4 �CO•'.G G�C O `'y Oy O L 646 yY �:12 '64 A'04 ..2 j� A 6 44 M° G O C i °C� A ~C M4�. yC bLl~ R'Y> ^ N YY wl°F LiN '�YJ. w�N.CL io aq i,'1 L LG'YW j•C�tl tyt, F• U W L � g2qyQ r °. Ga 141/i 6+G` •IV• O N h dV.O V x rYY; {GI 1 �'6 OY4V�� OV� LO 'YeC, d1 p{PI V MOI pw w L� �tIV.I Y V YCL V n �V�. �CLC� Y� 4L� i CC ONa If ' rC yMG .N ^V tl 4t�N ��y` ACT � VCTp Vag '°• '� s '•"2.; qti a "�"� a �� •G^ '►u. i1.�>w i °e �• s.-. c N. a 34 w.VV.�� N> yu w. .0 9 ^.. y ■� B 2 O f. �• G gyry _. N. d`QQQ0� 4 L ,» CI SL O v i1 {4� O�b L�Y� y� S ^y f.h L a ` , d� R LN. �Y•�N 4 y L YCC�G yaya ni ^_M �W >4 j6C L 'Q MRE OlOV _^ °4Y • ~nV rdNy m : L >o 4 s &N �>N, `O �4 iYy �w�•N.t1q. N o O 4 C J' V �6 N'V L d L Y ;� N i ea 4 O}.1w y� Y 4 Y Y 30� CD N C�yYy L44 d Y ■■VR�wy vyy :II , �{ r V V C G 8 Y� = Ci ^ _w M 4E :. yo.C•. Grni�M.4. lcsT`t ow�aY. ^ °.tpT RHO {yyy� V > u pr C �'�, V Y ^L CO /^Y .•. NpL�YY GG� VdO O4a r 4 L L Jer 1�• G 9 { ■� (p� T }OV 9 ■. G - =�54 1 Mb 11 Rol PoDr kaliatvzy wO.� qG cAaN �•`4 CGOCY.Cy- L Y wN a «��4pp l y`2 N )y � i V�a3i b r CpW � L 1C `q Y a C gti L i OYK i ti LAJ Ya>.y Yfi�a ry°. _CcSpO r T6A YY•W�AO �OGN rw •wT Q Y W.y Lam! �. �YV .- .qaa a �w� a.'c p L 8 cat ctzy 5-4 �Y1 pq . Z V V w ^N q AsRYv V rQ CYM i..C—Y �� SC tli o V_a 'Yg rig. 4Or'.N YE A Nil t: NL � 3 :3 3 W.Ota a� 7 yNj T.1E uvYa� r �.+. yNN QCO N,"YL Yw�. fL� V C p1C 1:N Otl SS ; 4uVu e�e,,��fY�'E C {EYLY, i1, W.Q SOY O. OI 5.. $ L �^' LC • /wNit.•p Yid � C q=UY b^ of F• i.E _3 ^.��0. 'M S ,=� t v CC ppE (' ` �,.. r ^N VA �y y� S UYUj LN��' C^ Cy+ L bNN�. P Y t �yWi Y A yam. it C Ls4 �q Eip��p YL L qK G.rY GM1�Dt� 1 ZI J�r.1 6Y� A y +pp~ V w N N��^ �M C � tl� � •�� W Y OO�C 4 �O d j yTy Oesp y� p. CeF ONY LLO�'� ZP LN•E N Y tl Y� 3« �C N O1 � j. YM Z2=• L V � � +O� N � V L'L��, _ u _ ■y O i jj QC �E i� _`:.atea bE � E� a'^ O 1.'- -5 yJ�i a! Y .� O', L Zlz ��' uW �.i OqLri�4L� �qLq V OLIN yySS� ^ GY rO i N��e �C�MpL M 4 Hit q�r a^ «iQ Ntl C °dNr p�V O`'�' riV wa�lGa ag ^ �e ^* 01 ° ■q N� LY Gp. pYi ` Y ■r Od pP. L C7 ...a*w 4p k �R...Yq ty1.M � t,.. W+1a AL t101O�t. ELM OfY -5 L � MY. qN ME �.W �1Y4 �~ E 9 L^ Y y N wNl .iY r N°� a+ C6°Ltt 0.� L =�^ °fir �tyy `- ~ v�ir+iia�. W�.OItl WVY j4 4LCL^ N ��'YEYCM (O�YC Y • 40.'T i -0 ti N C4 @� s I II 7.°. q� Y C � V• L r► y now I NYI?L LC VV� ° W dG.� ^1L. N q rJ qqy Mq �. ■y6Y W LPL � y u=i w. oc p _� L_° C Ne. V. e� N O ro Y. � O� N: y � • U. N �J O. =V O V 1 YYO Mw. ayN A°� Y rC aL� �.w ■°. E Y 9. L T w gNi$ 6j1O G~i er�' a � uj E O �'ggda •-Q °_m sg ii o�K.'$ N t3 a �� � �yN�'O ^s G CL V� Cq is O.y E Ny YU qC NVro C yC Y uyLy >� CLYi4Y�01� L YY� Oy ae u..�.°.$�gLr t LyYYL {`°,ate �aS: N`{-{L�,Y—a�e��`'�S ppCC� ' ®$uLi , �O$$� NV G.W$ !V Or WY P'LLt/ �� i.iV AC� a 1y�q Y YCLw. ES i. L ti E y I i a` y aY v r M `• N N ° a O. Y 4 {u� 7 L tlw L eaM �q� qY ,C p � 6 C \JC s�e > ��♦ q {. ^y .°rY LCD tlN � �.tlS vAw P"VVW^ Y°' r ■pp oC ii � i Nq-2 ye> LL .yfit m - Cv L ^ ° N O 1 N v N I Y Y yj ■ y N'� a C q Q ` >, qa q d C TM ` M $ ' L{1 Y^ M.�-.0 CM « W v.3q .°i �.r .0 L a 1 ALp a � wr'^ U!./:U iabrCYtqJ +YVC Ir 1 � I C I N Cv cp�A C2 2r H W 0. E > 4 00 Eli { qli v w ruJ e as G L a w Pw o ` a o a .0 ,v. .,Q cud Y v A `S .l Q LPL Y r r � L V a n u £a UC !���pt CCw. >444. G L L Q1Y Va YL a1lwYyw vY arC LL6 Q oV is4v 'NT 2 O.ti �Ln� N L w YL ♦r 1: a�q -aav� Y�i L 6pJ t ww� a �ZRy _N N��Mr V �1s o � eJ� 01µV �d 4 .6 ♦1� C fJdw� �M CmEa !? ai W al c D t 4 L 1 Yn� 13 N u� p C C ppw ££vvO LMT 6 V �n Y +� b � Y a ui i{e a L y w rV"i144� � p • c l � L w see Y: NV r ~ G 1 x � c s c L Y L 4 d ` L Y. N . � ui � Yw Y v C C w O L w M � f } Ypy ^Y n� n$ -C it y I N. t L n W y ��M 248 VSO L rp C t w Y ww V � O CC yO., wyyow _C� �vai a'b itY � a hgo. ILj n .T Ucz i us - C M +'rqco.. Sgt wv Iw IL O i�ry+1 C G�,$. Yw; alle yq Lw n I dMC nw.. t 0701 - 9 5. of 5 I I] DATE: TO: FROM- BY: SUBJECT: - CITY OF RANCV0 CUCAMONrA STAFF REPORT September 14, 1988 Chairman and Ptembers of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Debra Meier, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -20 -A LV RI f1 R lin nPulAlta -- Ine review of a Master an or a 1 4 acre n us rial Park within the General Industrial and Industrial Park Districts (Subareas 11 and 12) and Phase I cony.1sting of two light industrial buildings totaling 64,200 square feet on 3.8 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 11) of the Industrial Specific Plan Located south of Sixth Street east of Pittsburgh Avenue, south of Fourth greet, and west of 'Buffalo Avenue APN: 229-- ,'07- 22 -27. Related File: Parcel Map 11671. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: on eques a pprovai of Conceptue,L �Za or Plan, Phase I Site Plan an& Elevations, and Issuzmca of a Negative Declaration. B. Surrvinding Land Use and Zoning: or - x sti ng n us riai Development; General Industrial Subarea 11. South - Vacant Land; City of Ontario East - Vacant Land; General Industrial Subarea 13, and Industrial Park Subarea 12. West Bixby Master Plan Industrial Park; Industrial Park Subarea 12. C. General Plan Designations: 7r0 ec e enera Industrial /Industrial Park North - General Industrial ' South - City of Ontario East General Industrial /Industrial Park West - Industrial Park D. Site Characteristics: The sifv. +s vacant, with the exception of o a -F- a sou east corner of 6th Street and Pittsburgh Avenue, which contains an existing industrial building. Vegetation consists of decaying vineyards and native grasses. The five lots along Pittsburgh south of 6th Street were ITEM U PUVHING COWISSION STAFF REPORT OR 88 -20 - GILBERT AJA ASSOCIATES agteember 14, 1988 previously reviewed as Development Review 86 -45 for a llastij - 'Plan of five lots and approval of Lots 2 and 3. Constructi6a has not yet begun oK Lots 2 and 3 at this time. F. Phase I Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio lequired Provided Lot 6 if-r, 're 2,500 1/250 10 Mnfg. 7,500 1/500 15 Whse. 15,100 1 /1000 15 40 53 Lot 7 Office 3,900 Mnfg. 12,000 Whse. 2,3,200 1/250 16 1 /500 24 1/1000 (1) 20 1/2000 (2) 2 62 83 (1) 0- 20,000 square fleet of area (2) 20,000 - 40,000 squvre feet of area II. ANALYSIS: A. General• Master Plan. The purpose of the Master 'Plan is to serve as a gut a ne or fu`.ure development by establishing drive -way access, overall circulation system, drainage-patterns and some architectural and site planning guidelines. The overall Master Plan is intended to create a unified development, while at the same time maintaining the potential for self supporting businesses on individual parcels. This is achieved through i speculative, build -to -suit lot sales to individual users. The proposed Master Plan subdivides the 'site into 35 parcels ranging in size r'rom one and one -half acres to eight acres. All future development within the Master Plan area will require a separate Development /Design Review. At that time each parcel will be reviewed for individu,;; plaza open space areas. The applicant proposed to landscar* the perimeter of each block as the development of each phase coulences (See Exhibit C). V E Adak �' I 11 PLANNING COiMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 88 -20 - GILBERT AJA ASSOCIATES September 14, 1988 Page 3 2. Phase I Development. Phase I Development is located on the South side of Street, east of Pittsburgh Avenue. It consists of Lots 6 and 7, Each lot containing one light industrial building. 7;; lots will share drive -way access at the property line on 6th Street as well as an additional driveway on proposed Street A which will be shared by Lots 6, 7, and 8. Plaza and outdoor patio areas are provided on ersh lot as shown on Exhibit I. The proposed elevations consist of painted concrete tilt -up panels with a rectangular reveal pattern. The panel color includes two subtle tones (if gray with ' accent colors and glazing used to highlight entry locations. B. Desi n Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Mchiei, Emer c ,— Buller) as reviewed the project and made the following recommendations for the proposed Master Plan and Phase I development: Master Plan: 1. The landscaping concepts shall be designed to be a guideline to future development: within the feaster Plan. The guidelines shall establish street trees as well as plant materials used on -site for parking lot shading, accent trees, property boundary treatment etc. 2. The streetscape along 6th Street and 4th Street should be reflective of Special Boulevard status, The placement of buildings should provide variation in setback along the street to create interest. In addition, special considerat.on must be given along the 4th Street landscape setback due to an existing storm drain pipe. exhibit H reflects a possible landscape concept to respect the pipe. 3. The applicant shall prepare a Master Plan document to be reviewed by the City Planner prior to issuance of any building permits er recording of the parcel map, which ever occurs first. The document should esta&lish the guidelines for landscaping, site planning issues,, such as plaza open space areas and shared access, and architectural guidelines consistent with the appropriate' subarea of the Industrial Specific Plan. 4. A major concern with respect to this Master Plan is the southern portion of the site located within Subarea 12. The 4th Street corridor is a major access route into the city and a high quality character is deyit;d. U -3 W PLANNING CQNMISSION STAFF REPORT OR 88. c0 v'GILBERT AJA A:oOCIATES September 14, 1988 Page 4 Ask The Industrial Specific Plan identifies this subarea as one that could c.,pture tourist /airport ' oriented activities such as hotels and motets. In addition, corporate office parks for major users would be appropriate., The plaster Plan as presented to the committee did not meet tine goal_- end objectives of Subarea 12. The subdivision of this area into small parcels reflective of individual industrial development would not provide the corporate office park or hotellmotel activite desired along 4th Street. Staff Comments: The applicant has prepared a revised 'Sa area concept as requested by the Design Review Committee, upon review of the plan, staff is still of the opinion that it does not meet the #gals of the subarea. Staff suggests that Parcels 13 -13 be combined and Parcels 1.',22, and 25 be combine) to create potentials for future comprehensive Wice park developments. This recommendation is NOnet.ed as a Condition of Approval on the accompanying parcel map. Parcels 6 and 7 (Phase I Development) 1• The Committee recommended that the architecture be enhanced by additional articulation and use of textures in order to set a more distinctive tone for architectural development of the Master Plan as well as prow to the special boulevar_ status along ,6th Street. the Committee also recoomended that the setbacks be staggered to eliminate the straight building line along 6th Street. The a ))cant has indicated that then s7o not a roe with e osms ees recommen a ions w re ar s o arce s ana 7 acs w s o ursue w e site Ian an arc hi ec ure as presen e . C. Environmental As�,,(�t, ment: Environmental CeUTRY—and Environmental Impacts related project. Staff has completed the has found no significant to the development of this IiI. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the General Plan and, with time added modification to the area within Subarea 12, the Industrial Specific Plan. The project will not cause � significant adverse environmental impacts. addition, the Ur q C, f i PLAVNING CaMiSSION ST17F REPORT OR 89 -20 - GILBERT AJI, ASSOCIATES September 14, 1988 Page 5 proposed use, building design, Phase I Site Plan, and Master Plan, with recommended Conditions of Approval, are in compliance with the Industrial Area Specific Plan and all other applicable provisions of the City's Standards, IV. RECOMMENDATION: "Cf "the Commission feels that the project design, with e con , .ions proposed by the Design Rev!, Committee is acceptable, feien approval through adoption of the attached Resolution would be appropriate. However, �-hould the appli ',ant`s objections to the recommendations of the Desrgn Review Committee be determined valid, staff recomrrands that this project be continued to allow the applicant: time to return back to the Design Review Committee with direction from the Planning C01111mission. A third option would be for the Planning Commission to deny the project tecause the• applicant objects to t#-I conditions of approval and direct staff to prepare a Resolution a€ Denial for adoption at your, next meeting. Resp ally s ted /B Bu r O City nner l/ 88•0m: js Attachments: Exhibit "A" Master Plan Exhibit "B" Illustrative Master Plan Exhibit "C" - Master Plan Phasing Exhibit "D" Master Plan Alternative for Subarea 12 Exhibit "E" - Plaza /Entry Concept (Lot 17/16) Exhibit "F" - Project Details Exhibit "G" - Project Details Exhibit "H" - 4th Street Landscape Conceppt Exhibit "I" - Site Plan (Parcels 6 and 7) Exhibit "J" - Landscape Plan (Parcels 6 and 7) Exhibit "K" - Building Elevations Parcel 6 Exhibit "L" - Building Elevations - Parcel 6 and 7 Exhibit "M" - Grading Plan - Parcels 6 and 7 Resolution of Approval with Conditions T� OR TH CITY OF ITEM Cd RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: Al PLANNING DIVISION '�P EXHIBIT: _A�-� SCALE: :,� LLJ Q iL CIO cc lz 4TH STREET %J. FOURTH PHASE PHASE CIS 1 2. 4 NORTH If RANC�IOIAliONG ITEx: —moo - PLANNING DIVISION °TITLE: �,%r> PhSirx� GN U -8 EXHIBIT: Q.--- SCALE: SECOND PHASE EXTENT OF LANDSCAPING •� _q ATH STREET - - -1 _. _ _ �� •' ,.r - -i PAR. Ec PARCEL (as C PARCEI.7 PAHCOiL 11 1Ats AC 2.ira AC. 31 rt AC 2A L28a AC kt- f — 1010' !/ 4 PARCEL$ ` PARCEL PARCEL 30 i / 2.44a AC: W PARCEL 2S" AM axm I A:. W 4 zI 2.42. AC : .O �" P'ARCEL * PAACEL a III` I — 26 1., j3 m 1.11"AC 1.ifaAC 6y NI� PARCEL 3 I "���/ .� _ Petigei. 71 � '•., /a.oaAC PAR2C PARCEL ? /r. „ a • 24" A0; 2.OW AC. PARG.EL 2 I 11 _v.., ./. v 2.411L AC R R), f PAM& 11• PARCEL � PARCEI %.?aa AC. PARC3. 24 27 t AG 1.22a AC . I; PARCEL 6 = 21ts00I1hr a ' 3.74. AC. PAR�2 PARCEL PARCEL' _ Tuua0., . . !.� •. i^7 1.i.t AC1 7.Wt AC. i PARCEL a 13-1 PARCEL ti 2AOa AC's 2 AC PARCEL 22 • P 2 26 1.lO+A. <W C. f. l 2.YW AC { l• 2.2w _r PARCEL 1$ '- PAACE7, -.—i1 a �• AR i PARCEL n PARCEL a.a.yS. a.art AC • alit A0. _ —II 18 2Q 21 •1!�l'p.76 y7 ' IdMAC 1.lts.AC. l.9l7't AC e 4TH STREET %J. FOURTH PHASE PHASE CIS 1 2. 4 NORTH If RANC�IOIAliONG ITEx: —moo - PLANNING DIVISION °TITLE: �,%r> PhSirx� GN U -8 EXHIBIT: Q.--- SCALE: Ll t 1 CTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I-, '8 • I NORTH fae j� ITEM: TITLES EXHIL IT:. QZ - SCALE: j �• PUNNING DI TISJoN EXHIBIT: SCALE: NORTH TYMNY P44R1w♦ AWL Mr wltla lf.IleO —� o.wioeay.R -, y QSIXTH 3TPMT isea w4uw4r ' ii!�aW4o tovcR )( 1 .���w��ruwoRe r-- ruRr+uu �--- ss:ww ur gMYf RCReep asow aere� OPROPOSED A AMO i iTIMgT f�TM eT. A�r401y tamer st4nc TROCOeea 4 pip yy B' uwIIR�C —��� TIM ee4q���� use Fir- 06 PARCEL ENTRY �- °,•�— ���ita OF �RANCHO CUCAIMONGA � NNING ]DIVISION U - ( I ITE31: 43qAe -� v TITLE: _Prdif ccr�i EXHIBIT: if SCALE; aawe oovul� 1 �aa io VULDwa rvamEA I 041L 100% PROPOOEO'A`AiRELT ��CY14ra�rc,�Ywt �- I YY.uRf1�W_ {O mC1�11 � asme REA f-- �rl'1Aal la4ol.Yraftp � a e � 11 NORTH CITY OF ITEM! RANCHO CUCAMONG PLANNING DIVISION A rjTLE { EXHIBIT: .2�.. SCALE: 11 11 ?E0: WALKWAY - 'Wtii GROUND COVER {++ -TURF BERM r • PARKING. BAY S i.�8 SCREEN I ti J T 'CENTER WO' LINE $i 7t:FALO UFOURTH STREET ��rr ll OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: 4fll PLANNING DIVISI ®N U-(3 EXHIBIT: .. SCALE. 'Wtii EOALOERN(B {�FFALG AYI -TURF BERM r • PARKING. BAY S i.�8 SCREEN NOTE: TRFE FLANTWQ TO BE S LW f AWAY PAOM StORM DRAI�PK J 20' 3 70741 DRA;t FAgEA�NT r E@ }. EQ 4.4' NG ALO PO7RiTN STREET PPhOOPERTY um ��rr ll OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: 4fll PLANNING DIVISI ®N U-(3 EXHIBIT: .. SCALE. Sal" BiAFEi �y.. T..Y___..�..�.,r..l.._._� i� I ram VERTICAL ACCENT TREE LOW WALL � LUNCH AREA PLAN A Cl' OF RANCHO CtIcAMpN A PLANNING DIVISION U � � NORTH a TITLE: EXHIBIT: --T .__ 9CALEa Ir. "F Gtti STREET LOT 6 LANDSCAPE.LEOEND larmc I �y a.ws alarm atA (wwT A"M { ITREET TREE CMCA�O AYE. STREET Tfl EE p1.A7418 %A( ENTRY ACCENT THEE �T N(-r I.A'lGk0ER1 N ,d BUIIDINII PERIN£TER TREE LojAW'S:MACRIH i l VERTICAL ACCENT TREE " �� eto �p PWE TN7if GAZW Ml.EMD"NA F t i�PM(PldLNL1YStORR _ ENRCB NORTH .... :....- / - ---. CcxM:i nris •.r¢v+.1nm1 �K e SU&MNQ e -11TY or, "RANCHO CUCLMONG PLANNISr, DIVIS1011 1 Ell AORTH ITEM. $GMs e_�, ` D- s I l e ZTEM - I "V MONGA TITLE: gal.'el PLANNING DIVISION J/ U "� -7 EXHIEIT: r- c C. L c 5GG?gU A -A m k� I PP.�C1� OMl� PwtV1 tPPr E#Mw� . fYL�— �TYxI C•G .ont. �••ao• .apt r • V y�C. YN.J�•d C.0 a'' . dwk 4' � NORTH CITY OF AI��� tT ATE: � � -�. �N AI, TITLE:,` ��.A.NNING DTVISIC3N ���,,.�• . U -tb EXHIBIT:—Ad., �l RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 88 -20 FOR A 104 ACRE' MASTER PLAN WITHIN 'THE GENRAL INDUSTRIAL AND (SUBAREAS 11 and 12) AND PHASE ONE DEVELOPMENT CONSISTING OF TWO LIGHT, INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS 'roTALiNG 64,100 SOARE FEET ON 3.8 ACRES OF LAND IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 11), LOCATED BETWEEN 4TH STREET AND 6TH STREET AND BETWEEN PITTSBURGH AVENUE ARID BUFFALO AVENUE - APN: 229 - 263- 22 -27. A. Recitals. (i) Gilbert Aja and Associates has filed an application for the cpproval of Deveiopment Review No. 88 -20 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On the of 14th of September, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. (iii) All legal pr(:requisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting on Septamber 14, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located between 4th Street and 6.1 Street and between Pittsburgh Avenue and Buffalo Avenue and is presently Improved with development of Lost I and street improvements along the four perimeter streets; and _ (b) The property to the north of the subject site is industrial /R & D facilities, the property to the south of that site consists of vacant land, the property to the east is vacant land and the property to the crest is comprised of existing light industrial buildings and vacant land. 3. Bascl upon the substaui'- , ,vi`dence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting ana upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby Tinds and concludes as follows: U —(9 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 88 -20 - GIL.BERT AJA ASSOCIATIE September 14, 7983 Page 2 (a) That the F- oposed project is _consistent with the objecti'res of the General Plan; and (b) That the proposed use is in accord with the obJectiive of the Industrial Specific Plan and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and (c) That 'the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan; and (d) That the proposed use, together with the conditions, applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity., 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California EnYironmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph , 2 and 3 above, this Conmission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditiovis attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning_ Division: A. Master Plan I. The Master Plan is approved in concept only and futare development for each parcel shall be subject to Development /Design review procesa for Planning Commission approval. Modifications to the rester flan shall be subject to Planning Commission approval. 2. Each parcel developed within the Master Plan shall include individual p azaiopen space areas. 3. The perimeter of each block shall be landscaped as development within that block commences. r The landscaping along 4th Street shall be `designed to include the parameters of an existing storm drain pipe.` Setbacks greater than 45 feet may be necessary and will be reviewed in detail with Development /Design review application along 4th Street. IIjj PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, OR 8820 -- GILBERT AJA ASSOCIATES September 14, 1988 Page 3 5. The applicant shall develop a landscape concept for the Master Pian. This concept shall establish guidelines for streetscape design, property boundary desi2ns and maintenance, project identification for major street corners as well as a plant palatte for the selection of parking lot shade trees, entry accents, etc. 6. A uniform program for security fencing, shall be provided with the Master Plan and -�+•bject to the approval of the Foothill Fire District and tie City Planner. 7. The Master Plan text and /or CC and R °s for Parcel Map 11671 shall be developed to incorporate conditions Al through A6, and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to . ;ordation of the Parcel Map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The document shall Include guidelines for landscaping, site planning issues, shared access and architectural guidelines consistent with the appropriate subarea of the Industrial Specific Plan, 8. The following lots shall be combined into one parcel — parcels 13 through 18; and also parcels 11,=through 22, 25. The creation of the two large parcels is requested to provide consistency with the goals and objectives of subarea 12 of the Industrial. Specific Plan. B. Parcels 6 and 7 (Phase i Development) 1. The architectural concept shall be reviewed by the Design Review committee prior to issuance of building permits. The architecture shall include greater articulation of building planes and the addition of texture to the building surface. In addition, the setbaci.s shall provide for variation along the streetscape to enhance tte special b'.►ulevard status of 6th Street. 2. Detained landscape and irrigation plans for the perimeter block of Phase I Development shall be submitted for review ai:d approval prior to issuance of building permits for Phase I. Engineering Division: 1. Parcel Map 11671 shall record prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall cer" fy uo the adoption of this Resolution. U-� PLAMNING C"ISSION RESOL:iTION N0. DF ' 10 - GILBERT AJA ASSOCIATES Page aer 14, 1988 Page 4 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1988. PLANNING COMMISSIa OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. e , Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, ecre ry I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Comoisgion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Comm;ssion held on the 14th day of September, 1988, by.the following vote -to -wit: t AYES: COMMISSIONERS3 NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: ;OMMIS- �! *NERS: ` d \ 6J d Original poor, Quality C L O 31 M L+ L N Y a 4^ Q�7 ^Nq qY •d A'G u °� r�U 4 Lv �. d. LILw^R��vi y Nuyp qn, '°mi a� '^ud YL GY ady, aN C. Q,C WOC p�Y S �yy�i Q N Ste. LO. �!�4M NSN0a�0.Y d..O�ued'NYVly- IIg L'L'Y �«o QG?y rg•Y C. 54 k ',=•Ld�Nd�'°�4,oy'j. pt'O ftN NY45 :N ss a,1`a YC�°s N CCr y 4y °40 CGd An Ytl NC C�Of At NN- 6f+0yQ{I. pYVC 60usab wi ii .6 ^d d� a'uai gs' iOy� M N 2 J � M O 0 W I Q • Y d a N 0 r « A�YOu r^ -yew u��oN V ��y Y �g N q^ q C N A IA� pa Y yOrICMpp C CV. Q . L � Q^ M q 1— . � Y y a Lit U }.. bNq ai N Y4 Q4 °..LrpyY, ^p^ = C.. Y GGJY.Y ° VL LY weNyO�y^�j. VO JS L. N Y y gel axe EA zc e+1 ,V �MV� O�g1i.. CialO µy Oiiy L..�tl a >fp aO a Y YY • S� L �•ris oaa^ L. uGq{� N.- LY� aN. m asd� Y ' G. M� a •a w N d Y C` C r a o 3 i � L^ i y y G 4 +� `• C �:y � sn ^a •L�n'L�'~^aa "�' aNL� a"' A NcN a.. Q it °"ao u��� .c�a N=om u Le:3.a No m o ✓ Ydw pd 4• �E■ Y L A Z --"g' -L" L •n 0 4 0 `p •M �. L O ni 4 Y�� w R a y2= i4= 'g Ay �N N.. ■ C 6Y •fin ,,.W GO +. Ci 6 Q•yagSq ^V ^��Y LN.q� 9. �• NL3an•�t COY i�T7•LO� �a ~�iN fdL�� A6 Vd ^v Vt Amp J=3 C.�N L� YGKC6pi �rLq L� Lw��u =yC 0 °O N��(a�••.r Yv1YL °NCC p_- L A L 01i +C TO a N G d i r :.7; t Y ^, Y N= ~ 7 4 L c �. K % b". T O aM1 • L qYC O• Y�GYY w�� pR YWN. W � �,x �0. ��. ^1.4 CW p •G N LCUua 9j� yy O L� C �I. d L.. Y� s • � M Y qa�N. jiVn@C uCaCO' LtYOlL 9w �uLU a� �Q oho ajpilN a �N �a «YZ�p `d 'bLl �o r..E Y L p ■ Y...i Y M' 6 C C^ QaG¢ 9 C~ N C V isyyyyCi yt 'dYVGV vaNi.^C »Q O. €w•N. �•r'Y4 R�. �;�• yL �Y�a N� C LO! Gq ^4A I1 � �L Y3m�m Z. s p� NR�QsT °p ••k W 4S C O Yv yOV1 C pCice'r.. pd• N L wAy a. yA pa d v '0�=4.�9Y'C <°i�t•i3�0�G . a'S Ow VG °.` y« ■cy $ N D NN17'pQ 1 aiw1�WLfF yu l y+a Sg �M cpY�G.6�.1.G�Y°ea� w �Ya�o rw y.} • . . ONa3C .a " tLi l YYy ACiYCp ;� 3 i v ' No, a "g Y L S s A y }h c1 Yp is �o C � 6' m p L 3i ^ VL a 4 0 a V. go JL 'M is 0 C. ^R• ti C ( ( 1 m N p� Yp �� ly1l� �^^ ^Y� Y ,�. Mr + ■O��b MYCYw oV�Ot ���uv L� •�0. yNr�[Y y� Ca�. Y 6d �'��0:i`y �ON =Y Y�4i O. L• G Y L ys y. y C 0 N ^ Y ^ Y M L ` OY.. VN pw YC� mayy, {YC� Gi��L. /S OY 'GC LN C- Y• Y L O• Y O 9 C M• X q A ■ ■ii C YCa w •C. p :L N oaJ •O �¢ O TG�`9 Ma M ysair Qi cq t^ csi m +^i W''S `N a� Al cx 0. V N •• p C Y YP • s , ' L • Y V C V • } 9 q� Y e V C u C CC Te� O^ p �44�!! V C wot•ia sV 1 •a� C�y !/Y y '' 6 Y'y)p�1w�•OI °yy OaGY. 0.' C N 3 N w a� • L�. i g C G S C OC �^ p � �'� � N m i RO C uC 7� doj py #!N� '' W�^a�.N4��u.N ?Yn�Y�3u --m yO RQY `W.A CY._��1�.°p�6V• A�.0 Y" N• Gam. Y•C..lj pJ 'py • SS3a' L A' .�. C.wN OL w +VOewM L$IY ai Qc Lwc R O- w•N RC CC O W N C: • T1 20C .G Q Y± O _ �^ YP.0 � • .0 Bums 6L 01 so •^ C a'f. AN v � O �� GY�I. �Q.�r•i .nY� � iiO��AO a�Od YiGt T.a � ■� e�4 YC $�.�• 5.�.� °� Q�7��r�d'�'.,.i..�,wi ++.e1. "woN .' $Fc'a�. �sNwi. LO oY G 'C •�j • r+�¢��•..��1�pY C0.° n.= Cpl V QYY O C 4 C • C S R � 8a yQ yep Y OlyLx� 8 9 77 t V� N 'Y O W V `Ly RO•�.yC G} N' io `ta •w••N4 I�g.MO it uViC Ny�O �V �/dL�.41��w �Y.V/N6N• FCq�ay 0 11 I Poor j•(1 ^q ^qVMY t r�rA O N^� � ^qqOI` O OA � CL 0 O 000 . C0�d ''a. sY�YF�" nquO W Yj ' TG p CC G 9L6i T ■'O+. ♦(�j \yW4 \l; uLia 4C�C Oa y� ^� C.0 ytC/r� ^`�•� wuL G.��.C« 4 CVYF, L�YD MN ^ bwr� m'i Z tlG tlO O~ Y u� �Y 731 OOe CaQ 9O1�' O� tla >1Y F• ~ N G C Y V °r °c' .'p � *+L,r ,e2u o�..���11o"I. av t' N A V C^ CC 4 Y O {t NA �V7°N G ^YNG �• Oty' L4� S.� y >> r^p ya`NNC'6CU'�Y Y�.,VCCCCG yL N.v�^ Nas w�L� (LlOf `��10 OIC NL tr Y'�MgpNgiVie a -S °: 0 0 4 E q V N L. 4 Y O A A y .w N p YLL�• aM i0 O S a EN Zia N y A C L C N i Y G V S& N Mwt:s QO/ NN •' C,MY V g ON a6» 4 >o Sj� wi C +m �u L ° J_4•�• V)IY o ii �",S � „^°I.j �� " °c Na �"' p'rt' � � L pL C,GSL.•... °' .'�. � w�. to hr tt Y mow° Y. ^N `tl _yyC LiyC[ aN� �M NYJj OI Zh:- MOLA O� � O'�L`L � +' aLCNNYC ^N�^ 4•�11ok y ' ^oCY.V1 tl�V9L GYOI C�y��Y 3y� ����L1 �L1buOLpQ4 YL •C�y Ow+ � ±� y'Ip�Q� MCM CM EM' H4 �N� °Lii�N, JCCL p�Y �O9��1 {y� ...S Yy4 C MC •17 YO Ytl H •.N V M <N^ <N' NO 41!••N ~OON V IfC W DV C fi- N.0 OYOrL.. �}I� \ \Y� S <N U•.....p >Ola +K taw q KV WOG 4=4w obsit aH ' C=" $�a6 t Gp 4 y`� �1 64 °�,tl L q� Y aN[r_1• =r•y°''�� •' ■Y '�{ ^_)1 w_51� i.L1A° a �^+ 'eN� �7 `a'a� J� ...; 98 ' °,ivy a�a }p�`. N «� ■o« 6 <` Y prl Jy�iM 9 ;�4 CY�4 qN�1A S• LY Vy i.;i 4a L Oy.M 4�N �.Q ^ >a NM 'tlRw4 .Yy YY^tl wy L �� Y�'iSstl yy Gv^ e.,.M .rim L ^� �CNN� Y�° Lw�� O t �M�� L•' Sl rA �6 4 ' � .`t • v«��Ctl�_`e4�qY�L1rry _4C$ Mo g � �y yy i� w Y{y TOp:� y41 • AV�. u p G 'p o f qq".y NNL].y 1 3.�{ >,1 , C tl 2 � YY �� / w^ Oms sN MV ' L„ o Y ON wyM �4LD.� p tl O y�fiN1^ t^ µ b 1 . t4576gL1 �`O 6 �wN�i � M $ 'a y qL ;Zi_ V Y y SNCLd 0V'4o M V 4Fy'� F g3 M V SSSi i:--- Mo. +Nap4 O C ap9A! u WY a D Y teQg • '"r•'� c«,S «k' «g ~.II`� a"�' +pt �G'c: SY �� OyaG ; 'L�11€ NObr V. ;;V L 4••� LCN iN G. Hy O yyam^ a Cy r.� �•.Y 4 3� 6)YY6� N"; . + Cu NM1..�L4 r all. ^.L �� Z ^.l� YL q. .•.Y ^L tl`�CLY, �' � +Y ��qq {T{��4++tlL Cq F+'O Nw.A p CN� N4` Vlu° M l O x W d' orlon, M "Jj Poor Qualviv s +saw i v uUiM� V w 6$� Yo °C y `O6 w �i cQe Lres yY yV-w.Y U ^LY V � C y➢ 7 y ppCC �CgO.M V M V V YY N V C C M N L � Y O.LCY A O4 3` o a w OF i M 4 AIROpr1 Y C O V O N � 0 V Y Y Yq N Y y r �� v �o c 2 a�uaa °y NY C b � U o� u�- + G O O u tV�d M O 1V O•° � V Y = w v " C p O G �wLi CNC 6SYO ry? O N S ert C w CC+CL W � u uw a .ia. �ttu wY. w u u O. +o.Y+So Y N N ■■ �ua- c w� V Y +Y oY SCi ` S � nIo L V Z ors u �W �y C a NYh WO• V V Y w t°Y �.ui +� a Vu g�Yr� v = w ,o SLr oy O V G 6 p Yt $ 6°.YL M f�Vw. N VC N N •�V L W ' o a w G N N �v 'o �a OIL O ^ V a em` � ww =L w i V D � Y w v N \ � .941'v •rf N �.ti � w °� .�." °o a.� �rr. scii Cd S Y�� = Y Y ac• W V L L W C 1s. � �O r Li u� 6C� M ° yGG •� N L ➢ O ep ° i S N A L 6r a V G Y V H Y Y y O: °aL. ARE 'all ¢Y NrG Y^ MNY SSA CO �C> °L`r ��^ �•� w�� GG ONE O� y n 5f; £ N + ! �L pCw G 0 V ^O L M = Y 3W 6 w4d r t OLL t w � � °Y�p ii {�I °�S w�NLs G �r +iei�r aNi crt t -GI x'2111 °. f I yj � I riI s +saw i v uUiM� V w 6$� Yo °C y `O6 w �i cQe Lres yY yV-w.Y U ^LY V � C y➢ 7 y ppCC �CgO.M V M V V YY N V C C M N L � Y O.LCY A O4 3` o a w OF i M 4 AIROpr1 Y C O V O N � 0 V Y Y Yq N Y y r �� v �o c 2 a�uaa °y NY C b � U o� u�- + G O O u tV�d M O 1V O•° � V Y = w v " C p O G �wLi CNC 6SYO ry? O N S ert C w CC+CL W � u uw a .ia. �ttu wY. w u u O. +o.Y+So Y N N ■■ �ua- c w� V Y +Y oY SCi ` S � nIo L V Z ors u �W �y C a NYh WO• V V Y w t°Y �.ui +� a Vu g�Yr� v = w ,o SLr oy O V G 6 p Yt $ 6°.YL M f�Vw. N VC N N •�V L W ' o a w G N N �v 'o �a OIL O ^ V a em` � ww =L w i V D � Y w v N \ � .941'v N�` OYy^ BOB L� Cw wigt YOI. �' � w �y�aLO. sM ■r� 1s. � �O r Li u� 6C� M ° yGG •� N L ➢ O ep ° i S N A L 6r a V G Y V H Y Y y O: v+ w > a GG ONE t w � � °Y�p S wiSC tl6 °06 i S.0 Y�G LV ♦ W Y" x« ➢ w_M Yyy� ■yG4 YSrY L °6 GG ��Y Y N rw j2tu �� ^ -a aw QA S. E. 1$ M= i Y wOQ OE L° rVly . M O01/ CC LLO• Or QQ ��ww YLYG • NL�OppC L' p�4Vp "LAM. t7 al AL N N 6N gp wL w ii w p �r tIs . LZ a 3a3 Cj cII w N= N. 3 w Y O)� +.•. O CTi {�ry� `�.r- 1103 {1 j ;% ± qC -Z as ,YG GY °M OG � %w LC 6 o = LLuB ua Gi ■aa }G°G w.�w� 1S � •�VMP U WW G 4d ➢MM➢ {..S !i G�y N b 0 it 1 E E ° E • s ti V O d O � "+ Ay •V �tl q O N N Y 4 t O a M O w C YY4 qN = N 6tY d 4 �Nro W Vt°J �6 sl •� � u H z66 ^p y� 4,Y� isio bCp�L 6..qC C yYN A VaO • 4 „ 4 S H n�yl� i� •t1 4�yy~ c n 7 N g I a -ee O F O�p CLyG�'��Z• V pY «c�c7 �jl T� � y OC qp� °iHAS 1V YYC:H q. S 4 ¢c $I. ,g C Y -5 u Ovu wN v0 •� p0 �QQ11tt C631 p uo } G 1„�gos pCC ��W yy Y H Y ,�A L tV•1 nwiiO1a Gpoi c$c .� .. S.. ^N '� $. � e4 �o •'-. iu'��. of ru V `dpn tL�3Y t4 VYO OI• a3y ! LY LLs a Cpp4S E ° E • s ti V O d O � "+ Ay •V �tl q O N N Y 4 t O a M O w C YY4 qN = N 6tY d 4 �Nro W Vt°J �6 sl •� � V H z66 ^p y� 4,Y� Ov ~tl bCp�L 6..qC C yYN A VaO • 4 „ 4 S H n�yl� i� •t1 4�yy~ c n N g I a -ee O V pY G• MS `. up L MV � 1V YYC:H q. S Lv $I. ,g u Ovu wN v0 •� p0 �QQ11tt C631 cs p .I.- C C N D L 4 p q u n MVCC M C 9 N t ` i 4iNO °r. a�a�y. om 4 Y G O yy L` y Y L n i ^ r ro ` � r ^ F G y �sa�x V M•1y.4. f.Y.�M N p4 YVIY p4 L� • eY YSY. !I�. V L ^' pS o Va G• Y� � N 4 O• V V C LOIN O. ��G` Y90 O°S�Y Na= y ■Ct� Q". V • x ww. WW• sj Y4 SD y. &I ^$e L �� ° o �C • � �.0� �� 'HIS c �•a y 4 A V u a-� �I 9Q L A 4 Y xig Poor Y we Z v F 7 L C St V '� I w y Ka4 NVLL '^ 6Y M LCOCI W N.a Vdyy� L�C.rL a..ii CCQ O „. aCi O�OAO DypNC C C P tl � � � � N T�ti !I .CY pw _33LO $9b Hy k u� NaM u L1. cL ^�ry� 'O Y L y r 4^ Ya Y Vbr u�A T• N C O Cp V y�r sL .NC ilk TQ CC w_�N �Ny ~Qw pa a� Y y�y Yp �Vy?4.. r. �Qlq _C�� liis gbi Y tza SYNY �v �C LA tfd 4 ~ i+0 �Va� WF+. w'Q. �.�C� N� emu. L 4 'Z1� a� � IIN7 4Nw ^W StC N�� LL' YVy ttR�nl 44'�, ■�y■j� M ON YC l4 YY yy4 cc OGC O. .J gas a',M Va{NtlYis2 n �3 a °. y �i.C° V VQ N qMY� _Y °a±9 ` �YL Gp: Y,t GK U■ Yb L wpY{ p f. C. ` Y w 9T cvv .°. L VV a ey L L.,,YL, V di oa M L Ld.cY a^ r0 N C ENO ,Y N^� R 1 6 ^... 1 rN RYL~ � �� G n W Y ON � d Y u 0� Y � 1. O■ ^ caZ ^ b w L L.^y+ q 7 w pqg, iQt C � C NV�e. -2 +c^.� MC 41p V.grV Lw Nt Yw V r1i: 4L.A. �YG pL Vz- pat 'LO O r`Zu a HE �I 9Q L A 4 Y p W Y we Z v F 7 L C St V qAC 07 I w y Ka4 s C. a Y u w a�Y Ya Y ^Y ^G C VM N C O Cp V y�r sL .NC ilk TQ CC .!! t4.'� �Ny ~Qw pa Wv4Y y�y Yp �Vy?4.. r. �Qlq g Y tza +� 4 S-4 ifiz a � tZE N�� M y YVy 44'�, ■�y■j� M Y YC l4 YY 4t: g cc OGC r C O. .J �I 9Q L st�,fYDY C� Y IN v F 7 y 1 qAC 07 I w y Ka4 s C. a Y u w LMT .NC CSC °w TQ qY. Cy1 ACa ��Q ~Qw 'PyO Wv4Y �I 9Q L st�,fYDY C� v F 7 y qAC 07 I w y Ka4 s C. a Y u w LMT .NC CSC °w TQ qY. Cy1 ACa ��Q ~Qw 'PyO Wv4Y pps Yp �Vy?4.. r. �Qlq +� I u S-4 ifiz a � tZE til V O V� V VQ N Zio {Y.CCO KRW yLy m r 33 3 Vn New ` Y w i a° V Lit I4] -er L Y. °u n� e a� as �c A� u L � oN Y' � L a LLLL VO Y Y � Y NitY O C 6Y ° C_q O u� H� L 9at °a �aQa N L 4 6Y T4 L�d C e'ft e ay ��i00 u� qYy� q °;ecg c �L a�oQN� Y a ^ ~ Y a« a CP.ii L • Y 6 N W +•LF�P O N 4 q A i � j•: b e i• Y L p V ew asr S.w. aw c q�n n LV N L Y+ u 5i _CV p yQ L G./ G p Y .am 4 .ti C g$v _na r Y m C G � M L O u ° u � a + Y wY O 0 Y C d 'L uv_ Y � V V O'^ n L Y M L _M n= f b CCU V >�YpA Q L O per. V p ZRH, tl W � LY w `•• y�1..Cc b• ('1�� N la�i RW N i0• Iz y y 7 ai c- LI�M Y V ncaa L�r �ayyi Y •�.` rnn W N a q Q�JC{Lf iq Y. �T bi �tl N L •� b�N d� L y ca °n 6 �Y e± Y• O V �• ° N N � $- SAS O i H~ 2Q V q ar V w A p�� `•YyY pC o(oi 'da J GJS y qj w 6 V V C b iN cp�Nf a • V �yq�ii�E ONEl L �rL baf�a anP O N� GY Ci4a LF �C04_ �Nq • l4i �qr 4, 4I ;I i Y V ncaa L�r �ayyi Syy Q�JC{Lf iq Y. �T d^ L 9 L W Y �O oLa ca °n c3-rm, s� q{,)e °Na Er O, z5v SAS yp� 2Q V q ar V w A p�� q,, a�vO ■OO� J GJS y qj w 6 V V C b iN a • V �yq�ii�E ONEl L �rL .29 anP •.0. 9 2'y9� BJVt� V ,; yppNL Ci4a �C04_ �Nq 4, 4I ;I i d D — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA n STAFF REPORT r DATE: September 14, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FR%1: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Cindy Norris, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 1.1734 LEWIS HOMES Design rev ew o u g a ta Ins an p o p--lnns f or ?teases 3, 4 previously recorded Tract Map consisting of 61 condominium units o 4.6 acres of land is the Medium Density Residential District (8 -14 dwelling units per acre), located at the northwest corner of Vineyard Avenue and Arrow Route. AFN: 207- 192 -41 through 97. RELATED FILE: VARIANCE 88 -08 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of building elevations and plot plans. B. Project Density: 11.76 dwelling units per acre. C. Sur °rounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Existing tnwnhumes; Madium Density Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre). South - Multi- tenant Industrial Park; Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 1). East - Condominium project; Medium Density Residential (8 -14 dwelling units West - per acre). Cuesmogna Creek and Vacant; Flood Control and Medium Density Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre). 0. General Plan 0rsi9nations• Project Site - Medium Density Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre). North - Medium Density Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre), 'outh - General Industrial Ea�'t - dium D25sity Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) West - Flood Control and Rediu@ Density Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre). ITEM V PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPUT TENTATIVE TRACT 11734 - LEWIS HOMES September 14, 1968 Page 2 E. Site Characteristics: The site has an approximate slope of 2 percent rom porih`fo south. The southwestern portico of the site (tots 1, 2 and A) has been developed. with 35 units and a common recreation area. In addition, there is an existing woodcrete perimeter wall along the north, south and east portions of the site. II. ANALYSIS li. _Ba�c�kground: Tentative Tract 11734 was origina "lly approved py Planning Commission o� October 14, 1981 for a total of 98 condominiun units. P, to completion of the project, the developer ran intc_. .,iancial difficulties resulting in foreclosure on the proprt-ty. in December of 198", the Sarmakian Company proposed to complete the remainder of the project. However, as the project had been approved prior to adoption of the current Development Code, Variances for a reduction in the setbacks along Vineyard Avenue and Arrow Route and for the amount of guest parking were requested. On February 10, 1988, the planning commission voted to approve the setback reductions, but denied the larking Variance. Then, =n March of 1988, the 3armakian Company was unable to obtain an extension on their escrow and had to withdraw from the project. Lewis Homes subsequently purchased the proporty. On May 11, 1988, Lewis Howes of California submitted a design review application for the remaining three nhases. The applicant is proposing to modify the unit t,),2 to include primarily single family detac .d units with a few duplexes as opposed to the attached 2, 3, 4 and 5- plexes o- iginally approved. With this application, Variances for a reeuction in the amount of common open space from 35 percent to 13.2 percent and a reduction in the 'anterior sideyarU setbacks from 20 feet to a minimum of 12 feet are required. B. General: The applicant is proposing a total of three units, two of- which are detached units and one duplex. The units range in size from 1,200 square feet to 1,285 square feet. C. Design Review Committee: On duly 21, 1988, the Design Review ommi eu- rou - Tiitiea, F.merick) recommended revisions. On August 18, 1988, the Committee (Chitiea, Blakesly, Coleman) reviewed the project and :recommended approval subject to the following: ue V °ate PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 11734 - LUIS HOMES September 14, 1988 AOL Page 3 1. The Commit-tee expressed concern with the design of the duplex unit and recommended that significant changes be added to create a distinctly asymmetrical appearance to both the front and rear of the unit. Possible modifications may include modifying the chimney design Wing a decorative half circle reviewed the window design, etc. The revised elevations were reviewed as a consent calendar item on September 8. 1988, and approved subjec`: to the recommendation that the applicant add a half circle decorative element under the gable roof in place of the two square elemts. 2. The Committee recommended that the front elevation of unit 174 be revised to :;reate a more finished appearance by varying the roof or window designs. the applicant haz eleminated the individual unit 174. It will only be used in combination with the 175 plan as a duplex emit. 3. Revise the units to create more variety and inti,rest within . the interior of the site (i.e., vary window details, stucco relief in the dormer, etc.) Revised, elevations were reviewed as a consent calendar item un September 8,, 1188 and approved. 4. The romnittee indicated that the landscape areas between units are not appropriate as common open space area and recommended that these areas be included as primate side yards with decorative masonry side yard return walls. Exhibit B. 5. Cne of the two parking spaces located between the units at the southeast portion of the site should be relocated elsewhere so as to reduce the impact to adjacent units. Exhibit S. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the eve opment o e an the General Plan.. The project will not be detrimental to the adjacent properties or cause significant environmental impacts. In addition, the propoaad use and "site plan together with the recommended Conditions of Approval, are in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Development Code and City standards. k IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the esign Review of building elevations and plot plans for the 51 units through the adoption of the attached Resolution and Conditions of Approval. PLANING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 11934 - LEWIS HOMES September 14, 1988 Page 4 R"pe tfuliY saMitted, Brad - Buller City Planner BB; CN:.nl g Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Detailed Site Plait Exhibit "C" y Previously Approved Site Man Exhibit "a" - 6andsaape Plan Exhibit "E" . Elevations f' E fA FC LM •.lam_. �..� 1 t' { -_C~`? �i ® was m ®aaaaltr+rs�l's : @� �a+je r an *ione" _ p In man= aa ®aa Ron aoia oaaora■ *spin ggra IN LM kt GC I.S.P. Mtt 1�. =- • ` 'mil• •. .. 4 7 in amml 0 NO ir 9 , L LM 4 .l N. MY CF MEM: RANCHO MY..A. t p, L� � � _ti ran rt -- i�1,.i= �y �W jJR .. � I(�_l._'T'_ml -__jjt � 1 r 1� �,J `Jr�•J �/ II •� f X 176 t7t t7a »8 - � •5 '�'- b l�• ¢' +�►�� 1 ', j 7 f I �s 77s° 1�6 17$ tf�... na p175 at 175 : .t .1 ms ITS f7 174 176 I 1 1 75 �� T =. 1 ..� +r•' I W r le'l Pi 1' IN LL' . � l q . s KiOT� ( A- i -• I a V� 1 y 4.T. . L.yt O t \` 1 t [i F' -•1�_ 'o �j �1 =.o� YC �• '.� _i� 4.i 1 r1� ._,1 �.1r� �py,SCCI. if iY 744 AD 174 ITS 'lsi sJ.wa 173 f7j t tu4 s�cs4 1Q` tY 7� 176 1 tjt t r• i La j �tp • 1`'�EXISppp`T},' _.'_. � --} t ~t�--- '� --._, nwn{ t;.q� I 8 ARR6W tt� DECORA71VE�'t "� � T �iM ( \ 4; �•... t i !' 'PAV ' hImUTB { \� NOM cV rr RANCM A m ,1 1 1 ,tM a• i } bi 1 A.i i � .ire � t � t EA( i' Aw PL.LaC3 ' R 05 MBLrVRYION- p r ITO MWWATION rrEmr Xd 11 .M. - teYATON 11 L - `J 5 d N� 1 s a m H A 9 m 9 m s _= z G w . vtt t�nvIrfm G 7� n n v �U Cam_ GJ A sG 74 i; aafib, _ T M E- ; &'o t/C[ 16i�'S EXHi rr, f, = SCALE: Q RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION VPROYING DESIGN REVIEli FOR TRACT NO. 11734 - LEWIS HOMES LV;A1CD 4T THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF VINEYARD AVENUE AND ARROW HIGHWAY IN THE MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT APN: 247- 193 -41 THROUGH 97 A. Recitals. (i) Lewis Homes has filed an application for the Design Review of Tract No. 11734 as described in the title of this Resolution, Hereinafter, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On September 14, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of R*.pcho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Co; mission . during the above - referenced meeting on September 14, 1988, including written and oral stW reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the ob3ectives of the General Plan; and 2. bat the proposed design is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and 3. That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. and 4. Shat the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. PLANNING COMISSION RESOLUTION TRACT NO. 11734 - LEWIS HOMES September 14, 1988 Page 2 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Cu:iditions attached heretr and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning 1. Where necessary, the existing perimeter landscaping along Arrow Route and Vineyard Avenue shall be upgraded and any missing trees, shrubs on groundcover replaced. 2. All patio walls in public view shall be constructed of decorative masonry, concrete or other similar material. Wood is not an acceptable mater 4a1. 3. A decorative paving treatment shall be provided at all pedestrian crossing points within the drive aisles. 4. Landscape area between units shall be incorporated &s part of the private yard area for each unit. S. Parking spaces located between the unit °, at the southeast . portion of the site shall be relocated to the northern portion of the site in order to reduce the impact to adjacent units. 6. On the duplex unit provide a half circle decorative element under the gable roof in place of tte two square elements. Engineering I. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) en the project side of Arrow Route shall be undergrounded from thr first pole on the west sine of Vineyard Avenue to the first pole off -site on the west side of cucamonga channel, prior to public improvement acceptable or occupancy, whichever occurs first. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement; to recover one half the City adopted cost for undergrourding from future redevelopment as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. 2. An in -lieu fee as contribution to the fut;;re undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunication and electrical, except for the 66 KV electrical) on the opposite side of Vineyard Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be one half the City adopted unit amount times the length from the center of Arrow Route to the north project boundary (6Kk feet). 3. A "No Stopping fti Timer tone shall be installed along tho north side of Arnow Routa from Vineyard. Avenut to the west project boundary 0751 feet). 4, The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. rr i3 PLANNING CCWISSiON RESOLUttdA vRACT NO. 11734 - LEWIS HOMES September 14, 1988 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14,M DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON(' BY: rrry 'e , iasrrnan ATTEST: Brad u er, Secretary I I, Brdd Buller, Secratary of the Planh;nn;Coninission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the --foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the planning CowAssion of the City of F.:r,-7ho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commissiv held on this 1�th day of September, 1988, by the folleWing vote -tc -wit: AYES: C USSIONERS: 1 i NOES: COMMISSIONERS,. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 0 5 Poor QEbAty ~y L1NM Y4 YY�i Cw9 V.a q8 ALA ^u Ou0u lr Q1MM M 06'y O. HL p+ap •Q ®vv� ==Y COGG�9C•�VLG Y`tNi q G` pGEL�. NYj,t. C.00LOa Nt+++fieee4 iN VQECpcw^ lVI.N.r dpY pGN -.O.2 LqQY OG(�'U •" 0 C M L J Y T M O w p L C O G O w �. �. t��' �. Y �T�a 60.am?� Yd �M �CC Yig `V��.]]jj� VU W L3.0N L �y.V V yO Yt1 �GV O. �C6 V.ti O~� �v. YOB. IF.: rY'r �A044C iiY1LA ®yj pr. rio/y_M9CwCY ws�. wci ~!� Ow.G H N «OCwOT� �y�f4t Y9 io4. ..Y gYO nw, f ;ao�gE zz- oua- �5 Gg -w ad: lip f, "i 1.12. - N •-Y i �Mdi EZ �`y��.� =o�y�wii IL �Nj �Y �J C $e�Y Vei �°. a "eu o. +� �.^l.�t R-9��y' $0.y�M� coY' cry rc�N ^�Zici�e .- uS +.w- �Lii°i sir if °p.� wa�ywa�8, \;,�'� p a.L. r�4 ur5 N.trwi�j Tn N.v. °L�oj o. u `o• Y�'. :,g u 9�'`ora"draz I c N4zN: 3Ri aY�y3 N° >t�u6 dcxgu� �O ' V' OOO M/,, O y.. Y M^ 8C a. • L �Wi Y 6Y 6�_ N �33.' C d .N•u�. Gp �.S�L.q )e '•�•r$c�iaM KYiG3 (YYCr ° O^ pYF V i N W $ O G Y H V V � u g as F C t p O �VVV 6t 6 K 2 � SYVVr • � • 6 M4�4 C ~y OG Ii NW tl MY640')Y �g' '� Y ■i P� � ywlr0 �p 9, 3 ■`pV ¢TAy A 9-...0 I �N p Vt~V,w^ j.YyO L~ S VN4 ex t � 4� r9 yCiw.pC pM •[ � �qy cc 1 � H 0U tL Os yN I�aZO �qqK'•" J ..i N off • f R�--, h W C y E qv iN 7 Original .8.,. a «e • >«o a w u 6r llty 4; ua u c yQ ue1. a ?« �s1 O~ O LL�ON OY 9 + L ^^ n p yt 4.G N � r N N "y^ .., + T n yy Nq.N �Sf 0 a� YN33�V O O� L 9+ « +MC w N � d N� 0 * N Y N �� E 0wW�..O 4 N V u. rr G y '�V V OO ~ l� Y. Y M S y ■y ■y ■R O Va 7 N9 N Y O E q ` k O /// O r ti �EE�Y ff CN `� 9z M f 3 0 C 3 N�O��■` CO q V p ®...+iii fi1 V C y' L N P O O 4 w i;•�0. �'rN'�y Y y Z G A V^ n Q Af Z N: +w a.« � wOL.Na � S.Ny4 L Le �^ 11o�' Z N�N �N� y A.EL ^o +.0 t,1F ij �C °M .Q.•' QOy +E L t,Ni� OC y� O d�N L+ OV Pot a e.�� gSN ± r -.. V. a .1,ppj�j- su � 2"N. «xa`u i 11J NN dEo� '6g ^g rtc ^, ;v.� yS�l a' n� +c$ ���+ ^4 LLNw u V ,4z V', N•O• 9� u 293 w ea'si gig!- e µmg@' ?1'�oiu� NN ^^. +.o +.ry ac O C+'�Oq Opp +m a0 2.L- = E'w+o Y�O+ �u�1 N cY.^. y� ei as.g— %0 NL NC p!G lair =11+. — Alf C WCr' N���N a >a s�Y.�E , Y7 VY + G OE VY"' u+ YGLC L OY - GYd '^- her Y.w ■■ +e ;; C we MYL c ��j ��lVOyyyii Y pLpO M ' {$� i"Q'� ! 1{Od•pV�W 001 �}• J'y 4KUYG p�erM��YNYOg1 MR-s-12. vV Y _�, p y'� S4 y>iN Vai w{y.�. pyC T� OC ^p. wLi y�weE OC JCL �f /i .fir .a1 eAV w Li qv iN 7 grc .8.,. a «e • Loa`: wN a ?« ��■riie YN33�V �. VSY « +MC � � CO L a C. O o a 0 ■Q N^ Iwo UK Y P� SL IL �a� w0'fi tYuSC L QOy +E L t,Ni� OC y� w C Y Z L+ N -S Y d ... > u w l 4 r t G� ± r -.. V. a .1,ppj�j- su � 2"N. c c i 11J NN N ! Nu 4 ul! q L �O 4Y ~T pOff^ ■. P NEPC mow• �a Vaa x�` �,eti� ac � G$ KI tj I 66 N M 9 N L N X Y ^ei�a S N M� +^ w r Y ^. a wY 4W N' Y.OY v- ++4td6 N a�` L L x 4 « coeu N= �NL raj O .... 84 + L q CN CN O � S ` �OCLY µ4 O�L1 a.-yw w v d u^i 4 uo„e a +L teprdodr- u�a.G. lwv ,V Y M�tYVujN oUwo` u4 YO �� C 0�'41L 5 SIN,��Y OG O +T Ev O�Lj�Y i+N1S'uu Nw �CC■■4lL4M G C Y y Oy C 0 N� =f1'7 P N u�u "uw dLw. ou M a y 4 Cww u0uG �rGi1.AY GL w N f N Y C O C Z6RV ^a N C1Y wtll RLS. ^dV ON�j0 cVa�^ LsOO:e� LM V3 U V VV fO� O' Q��..1q� O.L d..� llL�� iCiCQ�Qd� Cp y .J 1 00 w.y Y Y.wn.n 'iiwY C .Q VV W VRV Y q V *.• a !� N 4 q � C� O G Y N Y. N. N� Y .. � . y i�R.' N qv !C ■C ■C ■cl i u � m 's { p �` sa . n.22- 2.. �9 �i V,p� aV+i DNS To~p �- ��CC P� f Nap! � «� OS VgC��J`i A•NC PL.NC. H'4.�M CR p�.�'C '�aC CTC A•' / °,$ ^NO V '^ A.n °K p'�d N 73`C °p��C. {�{�jjw l�� y�N L is�'� C■aN .i �1Y ^ 7 A�IOL ^ q �ry�_�w��]]{{N•� V d •• "' ` W iV R V N`NO .w~. .Cry�lrN ttN � . �II aV .u+N 0 p mtl _" 30 Y 0 NSR NN L �Cn p w _N 4 NR LL� I �yLV �a^ •T' •LF G. �° 1 � AY^ n'N N`O V'+�.q + r�l � tES O. N O' .CtiC R .�•�iaNL w�NUL .4CiLi� Y 4Ne6 NJJ 4L �NV� a� « «tt ^N! ppntMll,.g�`°•� Y�C p�CVL VN l� f VL StC. i+,CV Y NOy IpLl���Ll� 33.5 ■yO. M V i C p NLNL L QM� �Q iaNp LMM ^"gGL�C�Lib OCV ."^�C R p M.Vp °L 'r N.rO�N G l�! ��ll A yLyy y G pbC.CC KN.. <N 7M0 hNr QNV ^n.A >�N GV id•�.04 Ku ILON O.N HOC �q 1 Y OVf�il.� Ci cf0 L� p .C.Np NCR 99 N� S V ttN LTqy �i8 RTR YyIO u4GO. CV0 C�6 _ ■~ NY h �Jt YV ©r 40. nAr• VCO•PMV p ^ppL N$a Y V @c$O Ctl L�4paa Kw L••O� CC C A Cp. '•a �+� pGN �.„p. IL >tpO •apay AA R r OIL Ypr°i pp> CGY V qN ■ i � E L p{� ^ L i y� K OI V R� C� 4 i4 V �. � O N C M� p V 1« � C.+�VC Via^$s M 'dr- a =•'$ «Y�a1� �iR"' ^■ l�� po �^M 47A ••p V V ^� iN LI L 9d T� «O�V qq V R�� Y LO C^ p i{ ?{II pyy is p 00 Yp •p .T � Ay wTJw N V� .� ~Y yt1 ' Y- . M- - I V�,1 � a aVU+E uqi+ «. S ur O. °p V aLaNw. C Lp •C„� O VC pc .£ L R N �. Y Y' V °. LTOC V RY N � O. ST � R.p u' nc •a «Nn Iva .11 c p y.. _C X1�1l. O w_ W O 1 aNa Sri. V* O C ^ys� LOa� Vp l! npCr �ii.N G� R V4i LN V�°�� {• Cd utlj nV"pL� tLa- ^LLT ^A wool. . ^T�, �{T{��u�p�lla �. 'K+aNQ t4 i 'CQN H0 -N SL1 aC �O N,�VOW C tN•LA tY fY 6M1Ia i°a> H ri$inai C.O pdp Ko.w- O^4 2v" idviu : ^aN s ..C.r rd:�] GYY u�. �.4 1.'4C .~.. m2 u� ` -•~�0Y wC C MK fat /yQyCO V �y4 L� N a Y� �j L a �, M Y ? O yL��4•w ^w �. y {� T ■ � V > L d O +O L Cy i u b W a At a->- Gi; 5 MVN 9�Q V6LI�y CGL N: F•' N6Yy wCMSC �p y.�ap Cyl qq �C Y4 4�Cr. YV tLAT C3m - ~Y�i Lu upY �YVV W pw �i�N L V w Y w i Y.'rq' l� h1 4 ^ •� ppa •..RO. t'.0 Lvwti4 Y •N F q.CU 49 {N�.2 ~ to^ C� a`S� QI Sw. l q�Y /4 YM CR i.GY L r .Yy NYyO�a. NV� C'YO NxY 4 O�i�Q a ^V YG yNN� W C O p w N> A^ m N C I.- y.IT 3Sf 44�L a �? Gi <ArdN Y$ pa ® L TO Y 6s$ r. 6�4 d {pit L a N �yN H• a� n.M 3 y .hilt'. N w C a' 4. N V Y..N d G> Y NX+CpasfC t.+��a1DA _N V [". C �O �•iY mow•- ii N9 VA {, Lw�4 ` �H t{p/LGtyT. pL}N^ ` F'wOYO ��6� YLLI..I�I� �47 � •'�"W�� �.l R�i41�1 0.�gllyO N �' LET VI O. V a. pap 1A C•_oa ` Rc e7 ,per . �,P'y N'qY .G �NVV 1_yt w �V�1 �,OL ARV RI_L� pYp Cs• wqC' �4G 44'•nL �4 jr V VL •� �CwN1.y� .y�iv q.4 u�. ��Vn1 G � w 01q< a.'��^�.•_ aV1 �N1 L i Gps�r t 41 g C L L y L iiS3V �py 7oy s Cp Ji `pGGn �� �`�R� p L iMi L6Yw V4 A. '4Iln, ISU� M s yV N l w i w� aV>I p a N 6f p R� ip V W w =i > N gyw.w+ C r < ,$� gaGC N >. LV�`� 2 qF� �wy 1 tx. q g o u e p si,oc� e¢ i�� Cm E$e�Nr Vue: t iwo cr+ pe$ > �GR i i Q CM. {I L' • ~ 'O�yd. < aMy Mp G=. 1pr iiVN O. C 4 362 L�'Y L �% Q•�' d Y $� °a ,Gq p�V C iO Y{.O {u� � 4. G < � L C L A � � M � qTq •.D M L L � Q �l N ¢ ^ � V � � �y� nNyy owa{�Ywirr 1cC'+fLJ �yLy �1C�111 q� ylNp+p� YL pa4 il Od�C B.-,z L.L. �P <:. N. ^� Y _Cy dy�°I •1 �4L1 �N�M AC w m i CCyM±S. O! `a' N »C` V yO Dw LSM Y MCIY~ i. �r�•' C °o >fY ti. 3G. VGS V I S4»u�L }a gw�lQ�C+i p1. NwyyLaY C w M � Y V L' OCQ . CD01 9�l .rif �vN ` `q�GL y � 4C �4�•w .MIC.pgV Ja! . QN6p L -4I{ryl= � w 4 .s a_ q1Vw Ywi 0% y� O a N Gax. "'y'fw fie y. w wVw 114iO4Y Cwkra Imp ' Y yyhW tX1ap ae lq Gi N�.bww OC pIY Cf C O ♦i V �� '.Y« a °�'i 3r.G.. �1 w eLa H q Y.O. ��N aw.a l� N LM L t p 'Na L.3 N. 'C Titw w .�1 C nt 4C Cf Ca w C GM OC Op. ,iL Rw t i+`w... qr. C4� CL w,w. Q ■p M 4 vl 1 ll 5 Ps 0� 4 0 - Ylr L p c O O ti 41 1 l oyQyQYq a.'op^v r�. ''i q ■c� w G Noac d pyCY �Of4 Y -ip� L}L'' C W y � YY ^� � CO Ny L �as �• VY° ytl N.V� N C O �q0 O V _ y W bonpa d'�we:. &o La a ',' E� ..NLLYa Y O B 5� W cc u Giro c. Z2 N: Y. YvICOd� �C NC G�q _va .3�.s R sr�„N „ as as 'r' f -Y VI a P + Y u 3 tON �I.i� CO ABC ^CYC Y PiGIC$ C^P ■■C NN.V. �Llw LV V P�C� OC _V '� Q y AygCrC �QpY W �OY COVYO ■M4 � S V�pM V� ,p ` L• t++ p� S7^ s° �G.r Gas V yYy V 6x1 tpa�, G NN Y 9. pM G� aV M �t+. ° o o- xe �� L°,oL iw z33g8 aq W + ,,GG yy pp q^ G^ G MSCyr R at as V Q Y !T Y �O NM u �^L € VZU w_y. sV C Vas. Cp eei _ L.NpQ �y'O LO'L46 Nc o.P `� Ep p q V.IT IqS4 �1a� ffi p° xtC.€'0 Ga X ®® +�y 9 CN�PMO C =`^° YO Y C r A9 =:; 2 i Y. u {9. ps V. 9 + 9 V Y M ! -. a N L L z L r Y O ` N O� �M u i M 2. a°i +a L ACv+ n i �CO Y V +$ V r..p. V' ± a . i O OO �M N.Ci Nas Y.O+. +a•S tNt�� L d y� V r�i0 N pp ©YU uiLiuy Lid' - XOZ. ^YIy �yV �~ yYSCQ �Y � 2 Ca A uN�yp� 01'�p M Y ^A a v ^O +. y1� CsN.a Ya ^-a LC1 MY. L� L� 2 +Vw >� a4i tl. 9tY°,^�p.�L . q. W4 ��[Y, N. w tl1a C pM • '� Y {Y1 ^MY 4 N JY2 G �6�pp 4LN G 4g �p44Y. }}�. V�ONp G/ Lu$Q YyY. y4 y CM�y �Yy NO^ dL' S'1A L C Gs Nb L Cilia! Of ^gg Y7 Y �j _NON iw�p O3�_■�.{, {V frj !' � • N ly � N � I Vr Iq I UN � a� « Y � q W ° ay r Ll q L d C r ww p � L aw � Y ac �� C� 6G L L C fJ Y yY +n YD N� m� oil L Y ° V _ N G u 8 Lys 01yj1 6U S� r Y Z 1 N M N •'7 N J w0 OY �Q SZOV C c � o'� ti zz a c -aa C ^� 60,21 al Poor duality Y O O O Y �.c. OL t ■■ p V '�L � Y L< 1 N Y a „° aa� � .Y. • +Y ENO go w11 y �� �q.V N Y Y.0 ° $macuu�.4. wrT ^a "Y'' Lie .+� .°. '� IgilgY °yM M p G L t COQ C;: O LL V i. Y C � My � NaM � yyy. V � L vG..�ijY °n � � q N � 'YC �yy � = ` ^ V•• O q BE W' ` Y OVS L y6'YI�. LyY-. Oi�•l y�.� M pCC �Y �y1 3'. E G C yda q:SY aY f•• Y q �1°uy �a uu B. S >��> -5 N.`�.0 o W t G6�jC ur ` d W�Y.y^ N 6WC GqG� W �. ■ie U�VC Lw y� �~ Y'l�1t q� ^ 3N �yC"a C 4.CW 2� � �^°► pY•'"A �§ C L bpp^ L.° C a V�� yy ;s a's .Q E �Y ■a E�" p qV pv LOV VC f" V O afar a. 9 y Y ya6 Mgi �v .°. 1p C Sri {�{��•Yi ��� ° Ir ` w Y WN o$ G N � � °� V V •'" q pU y� N■.a ~ CW VY «Y., `=" i q y U�.rs a .^ -..�. �'f ` �p1 N G` a L �Cp �° �v�N y �Y L COQ G C'elVO �� L j Np � C G Cp V � . >• LL y� .p � p� Y Q a d L ,,GGY M a p N p �Y�1 •OW W!(ey ',p 3Y� � 6y L.V■ ^N. 6 a.,GO _� � L C Cy ^I J. iy' �7�:Q C°UC yV. L� �1� T ^iA C� C� �C •G.rpq 1A Z» Y VdC yVdtLU WO _C yq. 11 G �C 1�:% °1qV q C GU�y �i.Ljc jury qi �N Y C ^yY V u Yyn .i 4YC q�q Y�CC LYY4 �OyNY.. Lr N9 LNY °fI LLY. ^YYM11 G1Vr �N �YL���11 f�� I !\ .a !Ll d� WM uc c W Q 6N QI I Oi .fin f AI ti .�ijl •�,1 tiI I �, I � I Y 01 x' S I I UN � a� « Y � q W ° ay r Ll q L d C r ww p � L aw � Y ac �� C� 6G L L C fJ Y yY +n YD N� m� oil L Y ° V _ N G u 8 Lys 01yj1 6U S� r Y Z 1 N M N •'7 N J w0 OY �Q SZOV C c � o'� ti zz a c -aa C ^� 0 10 Y ��1aa Mp Yd +Y ENO go w11 y �� „VMOj c'byl L ° $macuu�.4. ^a GM t COQ C;: O ke Ny� qXP OVS -EL'O 3'. � 9 52y 6 L q ^iCyQ 4 �a uu G Y .43 o W t G6�jC ur ` d W�Y.y^ N 6WC GqG� ^ u uiiti Zia C 4.CW 2� � W a U O y Y QY V O ` N 6 6 o� oL ov was a 5R g o ca S V y' dw N� C � L o EX o °v a N� CY.d ILI � pC O L r N t p � w yiN V-fl a`qx $aS e I w C u Y � Lip�Y V' VQpO.q CZ �YOH yV � nt • ! C Y a VL 0A N �w up■� a ^!±� wY 9w Y+ d° 8 Nw � V L � 6 Auw O y V N Nr 6m i.ry aL N P U < N r NY y I y c1 1! bry: -. 8 Is fm v O Y O Rg4o P o�t� ` Lv 1.`u �yyd W 5 i �w c`^ rdy 'OGx�A p =-.0 V u ¢G p � VUV Q.� ! E 9yL1 C M ap L kl to y w L �� C 4 QY O/V v�; ~ w �yyy�{{CCp..� w C.5 N � d P4 z= OwY sus ii C w VO w V f's 2 K p d d o 0 15 2L d�C Y{a� Yyy y ory .�V `„ W^ a ^ „o wve . pi M qT� u -`q d61Q Leapp f 5 SCOW NA 4 I 11 F' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 14, 5988 --�, TO: Chairman and Members of the Manning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Senior Manner SUBJECT. YMCA PARKING a A DETERMINATION OF USE FOR pARKING Z",bMULAT OR — The West End YMCA is proposing to build a facility within Terra Vista adjoining a City park, The YMCA is requesting a use determination in terms of required parking. The Development Code has no exact use that would correspond to a YMCA facility. Thy proposed YMCA will include an indoor s.1mming pool, gymnasium, locker rooms, racquetball courts, multi- purpose space, administrative areeL, and a child care center. The Development code has parking standards for some of these uses as follows. Ctrnercial swimming pools Racquetball Gymnasiums (Health studios /spa) Child Care Administrative 1/100 square feet of water surface, Plus 1 /staff (minimum 1O spaces) 3 /court 1/15% square feet, including pool area and locker rooms 1 1sta €f, plus l /each 5 children 1/250 square feet The attached letter from the project architect indicates that the proposed 44,730 square foot facility (including pool) will ,,have I-It spaces, plus an additional 26 spaces for the adjacent park. Ti building was designed using a parking ratio of 1 space per 250 gros square feet which would require 179 spaces. No site plans or floor plans were submitted for comparison with Code requirements. In addition to determining parking ratios, determination is needed as to what review process should be required. The Terra Vista Community Plan designates tine proposed YMCA site as "Recreational Commercial" which Permits corinercial recreation an,; entertainment facilities, such as, health clubs, gymns, swimming pooh ar,�,:' racquetball clubs, subject to ITEM WW PLAMNINi AMISSION STAFF REPORT YMCA Pa .inq September 14, 7988 Page 2 the Development Review pr,9cess. Certain - - �"unity support uses are also permitted throughout the 'Planned Community subject to the Development Review process, such as public or private recreation facilities. Civic or community clubs and child care establiJimeents require a Conditional Use Permit. Staff will make an oral presentation at the d'oamission meeting. Res ully s 'tted, Sr lew City anner 88 :DC:vc Attachment: Letzers from Appiicanl- Wchitect f Pita -ssi•Daimau �1 , September 1, 1488 CITY p`��; . ,. "iAroy'�GA PeterlPitcul AIA. Architect _ Agin Da1=u, AIA. 14, Architect Mr. Brad Bulgy -r City Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga .t P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Subject: Rancho Cucamonga YMCA Dear Brad: On behalf of our client, the West End YMCA, we are hereby requesting a use determination in terms of required parking for our above referenced project. per the Development Code Section.. 17.12.040 there is no exact use that would correspond to a YMCA. As you know, this facility will .include a number oi uses such as an indoor swimming pool, a gymnasium, locker rooms, racquetball courts, ih- ulti- purpose space, administrative areas and :> child -care center. Based or our research, consultation with other similar Y's, and correspondence and discussion with the y's architectural consulting branch in Chicago, we are proposing a parking ratio of 1 space der 250 gross sq. ft. Our building has a gross area of 44,730 sq.. ft. including the pool surface. Based on this rata:,) we would be required to have 1'19 stalls. Our proposal includes 184 spaces for the Y's use plus an additional 2C spaces for the adjacent park's use. if you consider that over 5% of our building's area is dedicated to mechanical /electrical equipment end storage areas this further decreases the parking ratio. Brad, as yor know, this will be a fully massaged and programmed facility. As Bob Hnether, General Director of the Rest End YMCA indicates in his ate_ ae` letter, the facility will be managed to control the timing of events and thereby control this flow of traffic to and from the facility. -3 922$7 Hover: r alts 7 w Ron cho �._.UCCitTionao, CA 91730 • (714) 480 -1361 Mr. Brad Buller Rancho Cucamonga YMCA Parking September 1, 1988 Page 2 If you refer to the attached letter -= the Y's national planning office in Chicago you will see that we are exceeding their recommendation bard on facilities of similar size and program. one additions ' point to consider is our location within the Terra Vista rYanned community and our adjacency to the Greenway and puhl'ie,.park therein. Convenient pedestrian and bicycle access will be provided. In conclusion, we. feel that our proposal is very reasonable and will :adequately meet t'r.e needs of the Rancho Cucamonga YMCA. Brad, as always, we appreciate your prompt attention to this matter and we than!r you in advance for your consideration. Should you need any additional information, please do not hesitate to inquire. VeAt7uurs PiAr itects e i, A.I.A. Architect PJP:sgd Enclosed: West En" YMCA letter of 8/14/88 YMCA of LISA letter of 812 1'visa � Site Man U EST END YIA "The YMCA Sm.W h, V1.t &,i of Sea 8enuirac a CWmiy CHINO GUASTI 41ON'i'CLMR tIZ 9ALDY ONTARIO RANCHO CUC MONGA UPLAND August 24, 1988 215 West *C' Street Ontario, California 9176k C, 14) 9% 4647 Mr. Brad Buller City Planner 9340 Baseline Rd., Ste. B P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730 Dear Brad: After considerable research, the Y:ICA feels that 180 parkin6 &tails for the Rancho Cucamonga YMCA will be adequate based on the following: - The YMCA is a controlled Fr 4= Yacxity, that is, we can adjust program times to Manage parking lot »raffic flow. Program spacial events which could increase parking use can be scheduled at non- peak usage hours to lessen impact on parking. The park itself will have 26 parking stalls; bringing the total number of stalls to 206. - Compared with similar Y11CAs, the number of - arking stalls is adequate for our use. Statements attesting to this Are being provided From both the National YMMCA and from Y.he Sanra Anita YMCA in Monrovia. T feel, Brad, that additional spates would be unnecessary and would take away from valuable park space. T really appreciate your support far our project and hope you -;nd your staff will review the YMCA as a unique facility, well planned to meet the needs of our city. nerIV, elyyua, Sob Huether Caneral Director BI{ /pd ,F'rE 'N EUSINE -S :YMCA 23 August 1988• + YMCA 4Y th& EM4 Mr_ Peter J. PitaSSi AIA BFS Arrhr¢rturut Consvfurg s $1nkroe &,wgrt Pitassi- Qalmau Architerts 101 \o:Yh Wxckernm•a 9261 Haven ' Jenue cnr: nhr:r,rs r aos Suite 220 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 !gear Pete: I have reviewed your plans for the Rancho Cucamonga YMCA. From an occupancy standpoint, derived by assigning a maximum number of users to each program area, I would except the peak participation load to be between 350 to 400 peo{.le. This calculatipn however does not include childcare and any special events. My recommendation ?or partying is to provide approximately ISO spaces. This count allows for a ratio o� adults to children in the overall occupancy number as well as potential shared € .des. In ad.ition, it is in keeoing with our research data on existOg Y facilities of 'nilar program and size. G Sincerely, George P. Stazin, AIA For the US GPSQck cc: Mr. Robert Ht-ether W 40 J elty SANTA ANiTA FAMILY YMCA sai sputa - ouNTAiN AvENuE, MONROVIA CA r+016 TALE. 18184383 -92,44 August 30, 1988 Robert HUether 215 W. C St. Ontario, CA. 51782 Dear Bob; In response to your request on the Santa Anita Family YMCA's pa -king situation., the Y is locatod on City Park Land with 90 parking lot sparer in the Y parking lot. There are an additi.of,al 30 spot; located by a park recreation hut, directly south of the Y and within easy walking distance. The street parking adds another 40 spaces around the building with no restrictions. With a membership of 1,800 and over 5,500 yearly parti- cipants, we'have not experienced a parking preblen in the four and a half years we have operated.. With t14a flexibility of the Y's program and extensive operat ',inn hours, we do not experience a parking problem. Bob, good luck with your project and call if I can be of any further assistance. Sincerely, David Brown Execitive Director WEST END YMCA 117V YMCA semVVchc uroc Endm`s ,. CHIN GUASfI MONTCLAIR MT. BALDY ONTARIO RANCHO CUCAMONGA UPLAND July 25, 3988 x25'�Vesc'C' Sex nnt"ai.YO, Califamia 9x7'6 {7)4)9865&41( '< Lauren Wasserman, City $tanager City of Rancho Cucamonga 9920 Baseline Rd. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 9173 Dear Lauren: Thought you might be interested in same statit:"cs tcegs�,Ung parking avail- able at YNCAS in the West. As you can see from the zttached, su*,�urban Full- facility YMCA9 (containing pool, gym, etc.) range from 116 -1,10 spaces with no problems, L#., =a Rigel Y is built on a county park with parking space provided by the ccuntp. I feel 150 spaces should be adequate. besed on the constant tur.'n -orir of People using the YMCA. Please lat me know if I can provide any further information. Best regards, em Bob Huether General Director BH /pd Enclosure a: cm QE f�F�1� PEOPLE BUSINESS ,; Section 17.12.(140 s, `\ (m) Motor vehicle sales and automotive repair, sinting, body work or service: One per four hundred (400) square feet of gross Poor area. (n) Stores solely for the sale of furniture and applianeeo: One for each five hundred (500) square feet of gross floor area. (o) Trade schools, business colleges apd commercial schook,4 One for each three (3) student capacity of each classroom plus one for each faculty membsx u. employee. 2. Commercial recreation uses: (a) Bowling alleys mid/or billiard halls: Five (5) for each alley and /or two (2) for each billiard table contained therein. (b) Commercial stables: One (1) accessible space for each the (5) horses boarder on the premises. (c) Driving ranges (gol :): One per ten, plus the spaces rerdired for additional uses on the site. (d) GoL* courses (regulation course): Sic (6) ,)er hole plus the spaces required for additional uses on the site. (e) "Pith and Putt" and miniature golf course: Three (3) per hole, plus ® requirements for accessory uses. (f) Skating rinks, ice or .roller: One for each one hundred (100) square feet of gross floor area: plus the spaces required for additional uses on :he alte. r� Swimming pool (commercial): One for each one hundred (100) squaZz v feet of water surface, plus ova stall for each employee, but not less than ten (10) sitalls for any such nse. (h Tennis, haneball and racquetball facilities: Three (3) for each court plus the spe. ces required for additional uses on the site. 3. Educational useu (a) Elemeantrzy and junior high schools: Two (2) for each classroom. (b) Senicr high schools. One for each member of the faculty and each emplcyee, plus one for each six (6) students regularly enrolled. (c) Coll &ges, universities and iffititutions of higher learning, parochial and private: One for each three (3) students plus one for each two i2) merabers of the faculty and employees. ` 4. Health us6;;2 (a) Dentpl climes or offices; medical clinics or offices, veterinary hospitals and clinics. One for each twc hundred (200) sque!e. feet o ^i ¢rocs floor area. Q Section 17.12.040 Churches and other places of assembly not specified above: One for RACK four (4) fixed seats within the main auditorium or one for each thirty-five (35) square feet o; seating area within the main auditeritut where there are no fixed seats; eighteen (18) linear inches of bench shall be considers t, a fixed see'. 7. Other uses: a) Day nurseries, including preschools and nursery, schools: One stall for each staff member, plus one for each five (5) children. C. Special R.eauirements. The following parking requirements a„- P.pplicabie to all commer,731, slid 0- %e land uses. ThLie special stalls shall be closest to :j= facility Lit which they are designated in order to encourage their use. 1. Handicapped: Those facilities with twenty-five (25) or more spaces shall designate two (2) percent or one (1) space, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by She handicapped. The designation and design shall conform to state standard. 2. Motorcyclm: Facilities with twenty -.five (25)- or more parkins spates shall provide at least one designated Parkin g� area for use by moto,vycle;i. Developn.wnts wiW over one hundred (100) spaces shall provide moWevole parking at the rate of one percent. A:ass delineact4d for vse by motorcycles shall meet standards set forth in subseeti^ti 17.12.030 -C -t 3. Compact cars: Facilities with twenty-five (25) or more parking spal;es may provide up to thirty -five. (35) 'percent of its parting for use by .- ompact cars.- Spaces delinested, for compact car use shall meet standards set forth in subsection 17.12.030 -A -2. 4. Bicycles: All commercial and office areas shall provide adeou�te locking facilities for bicycle parking at any locaVon convenic-it to C .aeility for which they are designated. Vftnever• m oesible, weatherproofing or facility covfaring should ha used.. S. Car pools: Off-street parking provided for mmmercial/officea facilities shall provide at least ten (A) percent of the total parking area as designated for use by car pools. �. Drive Thru Facilities: Drive -tt u fa� • hies require- spee~ai consideration as their design can significantly bapact he vehicular circulation on a site. The following requirements apply to any .fie with drive -thru facilities. (a) Eel drive -thru lane shall be separated from the circulation routes h"ssary fur ingress or egress frt:m the proparty, c r aeaess to any parking space. (b) Each drivs-thru lane shalt te- striped, marked, of otherwbe distinctP7 delineated. °129° v �J erection 17,12.00 In evaluating the req+aest, the Mt. 7 ginner shalt coNjicer among other Lctors: (a) Pmjected effectiveness- of carpool, vanpool, staggered work hours or similar transportation programs. (b) Proximity to public ir- nspertation facilities serving a significant portion of employees and/or customers,. ic) 2vidence that employees and /or customcrs utWze, on a regular basis, transportation alternatives to the automobile. 3. Pr3.ti n" gtsuctures: ;owe the height of the, structure is limited by other sections cf tlto De-,�,elopment Coda, one &WItiono! floor or story may be allowed subject to apprmval of the Cit" Piannu uaft the following: conditions; W At least seventy -fiv (75) percent of ft, quad floor is used for off- street parking, access and maneuvering. (b) Use of the rem"ig ground floor area is limited to manager's ofllce•, elevators, servi^c facilities, and t icMing access facilities . inc!udiing entrance foyer or lobby. (c) Ground fioo- parking shall be screened, insofar as practicable, from surrounding uses and from public- view.