Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1988/12/14 - Agenda Packet
0701 o 12-14-8,8 P.C. Agenda 1. of 7 Crry OF RA WC k� -PIAr�N -PqCw I V'V �lCUj SSUN O U t�,.X.�tl�l 1977 WEDNESDAY December 14, 1888 7:00 p.m. LIONS PARK COMaaV=Y CENTER 9151 BASE Lim RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA '. Pledge of Allegiance IL Rohl Call. Commissioner Blakeslay Commissioner Bmerlok _ _ Commissioner Chitiea Commissioner Mell el Commissioner Tolstoy I¢L Amtouneententa IV. 8pprowd of Minutes '1 Adjourned Meeting .at November 17,1988 °J November 30, 1988 Y. Consent Calendar The folta .ng Consent Calendar items or, sxpzseted 'to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted an t) the Commissions a- one time Without d1sca=,on, If anyone has concern over any item. itsheWd be removed fotdiscussion. A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT - iiE'iElti* ?8 -34 - C. P. LANG - A prapoeul to. develop multi-tenant of i4e mxnu acturing complex on 2e B acres of land in the Industrial Lark District, Subarea 7, locxled on, the southeast corner of Elm Avenue and White Oak Avenue - APNt 208- 351 -62. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DvVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -30 - CARNEY THE DOR U - The development of an oI ? 2e building totaling 11,539 squaie feet *n.717 aei:es of lams in the Industrial Specific. Plan (Subarea lay located north of Civic Center, east of Utica, oz.lot 14 - APN: 208- r 962-10. G• 0 4L • vol tilr�b GS " Flo �' nclti' ��:•� a° s' S �ea9 G °rtir�e yr �ou�h Yoe i}ye co�,Ga �o ante iggR`� �ofioFte4`�� aUet' s, ales lgG �ti51,� ,�GO�O �Gace to so to Vol Go s7°4ti std °o�ss Glr 10tr -C eSSOQir�o yn F tt` ary arean vA .� k o$ro 4 sv °o god �� `? o a yr cwt ,Se Of tt�`n � - n F" �G a>yz's� a ec �11d �• vC� wit�9 LwQ` ea � 6t � � a� hoc �1•.1�. :aobe c �° ort$s 4 r � L fa��15� g�,1 �a � = � s 4 a$ fi Syy7' Gtiy �;e�ttsl�°'VVI ,lye ' yG��1A/y� rol rl°`te yi4�fl� 39 of V-0 W Gast rs�ive r�tiara u{ y3etg0e 9 tit oryet o aes'�Uo� �reti'�'Gas�Gye..} �� tie IOU a, aG�na4¢° yQ 4S� sesi aGtereg� �raca 04 rr seas�,b - m� lG° � �y�p,��� yGn� pt1�'S'cyy4 00 .' t •ace . Gt ��� °� �b3�'. _ai l QYa gOs IVA et gl aSti 3p,19� e'c e t � -, U _.� e � aG�e�cyey sFor -,NIP ara �.txe y 1 ok trG� o C4 • .n4L� �+��Ns'� ec rot o4 .per ar peg tire •ti' esti. Lir`� �+�11i�� ,� to dti�•y''r l at ��• tYp EAU - ys °x, 4,�g.eAvesGe� 1 a,�a Gatecy Zq9. �,S � �, t Go met �e.��a Q, c to SAS lr F1a� G mA a' es� E+r�`NyaT a�QFaG 4� ya�5, Est �°� Ora rrr' t< erG 4'�ar C. ENTERTAINM! 4T PERMIT 88-01 HARRY CIS - A request to conduct 4 � equiedy ants, sports celebrities promoting sports teamsr, �,!ontests, hair and clothing fashi(,.n shows, kind e ,iei�6st to continue I'dise jocker doing vccals and playi-�,, records nightly in conjQnotion with a re—stwirant/night club, located at 10877 Foothill Boulevard. PublieReariw The following items are pubdo hearing& in which concernw! indlviducf,s mti�v vIce their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be r d by tha Chairman and address thp Commission by stating your tpame and adem;S. All such opinions shall be limited to S minutd-per individual for eaqh projpct� D. EJVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 13945 -' CITATION - �: resMential subdivision and design review of 35 siiFg1—efamiIy lots on 15 acres of land in the Low Density Residefiti,l District (2-4 dwelling imits per acrr)� of the Etlwanda Specific Plan, located on the south side of Hio'and, east o! East Avenue - APN-. 297-071-18. (Contin% �,d from November 30,,1988.) E. TIME EXTENSION FOR AND MOD��ICATV'N TO CONDUIONAi USE PERMIT 84-21, -!� IJOM CHRi��'LAAN CHURCH - A request to conli� I r.-t an exist' g rl-869,iidare foot single family residence to 4. h 9�fift for the Alta Loma Christien Church or. .25 acres uZi'lattd in the Very Low Residential Diztr1ct'(less aim 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the west ,;;.de of Sapphire Street, aero�;s from Orange Street - APIT: 1062-332-23. (Continued from November 30, 1298.) F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERM GA CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP - r� request to establish a cln� b1n a leased space of 30,0 0 square feet, within an existingIndustrial park on 1.8 acres oZ 3and in Sizarea 4 (General Industlal) of the Industrial Spetifie Plan, located at the northwest comer of 7th and Archibald - APN; 209-171-45. G. ENVIRONMENT.�L ASSESSME14T AND TENTATIVE TRACT 14150 - WESTERR PROPERTI—KS`- A request to TU6Z—vide Tract 113271, an opproved one-lot map consisting of 128 townhomes on 8.66 acres at the northwest comer of Milliken Avenue',, �`� i Terra Vista Parkway within the Terra Vista Planned Oommunity into Slots - APH; 1077-091-29. H. L J, K. L. M AN 'APPEAL OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL,, FOR T3NTATIVE TRACT 13738 - RODOTE COMPANY - A- An appew of Conditions of Approval pertaining to . utility undergrounding, street dedications and improvemew4s, emergency access and storm drain facilities required for a residential subdivision of I3 single family lots on 12.88 acres of land in the. Very Low Residential Distrfet (1 -2 dwelling units per acre), located west of Sapphire Street, south of Almond Stme, APN 1061 - 091 -03. (Referred from Novq -rer 16, 1983 Clty Counyil meeting;.) x;11RONMENTAL AS98SSMEFT AND TRETA.TI�3E PARCEL 4AP 11934 - L. A. CH NNCCO,�Ii`Ct)2i ORT-F DEW subdivia3on o 2.72 acres of into 2 paretls in tiro Meth "; m Density X sidential District (8 -11' dwelling units per acre), located on the east side of Archibald A- venue, approximately 150 feeteouth of lemon Avenue - APN: 201- 252 -03,. ENVIR0114 1ENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT liFYIF W J 88-20 - SMITH -, The a4dition o seven 7 apartment units to an existing' spare _tent complex c.,nsiating of 63 un;ts on 5.33 acres of .land _n thi Medium Residential District (8- 14 dwelling twifis per acre), located oil he east side -if Aroblbald Avenue, south of Church Street - AM 10777'332 . -25. CONDITIONAL USE PEIIMIT 88-45 SIAM GARDEN RESTAURANT - A request to establish the we o hard liquor for on -site consumption in an existing 2,160 square foot restaurant on 4.05 acres of land in the Rancho Cucamonga Village Shopping Center, located at the northeast corner zA Foothill Boulevard and Ramona Avenue - APN: 1077 - 621 -3C MODIFICATIONS TO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AND DESIGN REVIEW FOR TEh7Nr1VE TRACT 12870 DALY HOMES -- A request to modify Conditions o Approval requiring a 5 toot earthen berm along Etiwanda Avenue and size of eucalyptus replacement plaiting as well as the Design Review of building elevations and Detailed Site Plan for a previously approved tract map con,lst.ng of 67 single family lots on 66.10 acres of land in the 'V'ery Low Residential District (up to 2 dwelling units pe!r acre), located on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Highland - APN: 225 -181 11, 12, 13, 19, 20, 21, d: ?9. MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AND TIME XTENSION FOR i505 D i ONAL USE PERMIT 86-24 - MATLOCK ASSOCIATES :" We development of a 12,000 square oot�" t eonveniencR styles and service center on 1.18 acres of lanes in the General industrial /Rail Served % striet (Subarea 2), lo..ated at the northeast, corner of 8th Street and Vineyard Avenue APN: 209 - 013 -15. t N. 1 i i i TIME Ek-TEUSION FOR VARIANCE 88 -06 - MATLOCK A S0 Rg- 41, ieque+st to reduce the required average 25 oot iands� aping on 8th Street ranging from 15 to 22 feet; to eliminate the required 5 foot interior side yard setback for a 1',000 square foot convenience soles and service center on 1.18 acres of land in the General Industri"ail Served District, to-eated at the northeast corner,jof 8th Street and Vineyard Avenue W APN: 200- 013 -15. r 0. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMF -TT AND PARCAL MLP 1194E WHI E AK!E MME . - -A KmFon intorest subdivision of 2.96 acres a laud intca 20 parcels In the Industrial Park Area,, Subarea 7, Ireated at th;e southeast oorner of White Oak and Elm Avenues - APN: 208- 351 -62. VIL 014 1Bmn P. PHASING PLAN i? aR C014DITIONAL USE PERMIT 88 -12 - WERERN 1'R�3PEkTIES - A request to reconsi er `the Planning. OotnmissioWs conditions regarding phasing for the Tierra Vista Town Center, an integrated community shopping center on 71 acres of ]and located at the northeast comer of Haven Avenue and Voothill Boulevard - APN: 1077- 421 -05, 06, and 13. Q. SAPPHIRE TRAM ',Oral Report) VILL New Bus*wesa y: R. TRACT 1385;Y DESIGN REVIEW - M. J. BR,OCK & SONS INC. - The s� e g ;Review of building elevations and Detailed Site Plan for a previously. - approved Tentative Tract Map consisting of 0 single � ,amiiy, lots on 18.48 acres of land in the Low - Medium Residential District (4 -8 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest confer of Banya.1 and Millikert Avenues - AP T: 201 - 271 -55. S. TRACT 13858 'DESIGN REVIEW - M. J. BROCK & SONS, INC,. = Th e flesign Review of building elevations lletailed Site Plo 6or a previously approved Tentative Tract Map ov,a :it ing of 61 single family lots on 17.40 acres of land in the Low-Medium. Residential District (4 -$ dwelling units per acre),, located at the southwest corner of Banyan and Millikear Avenut,s - APNt 201- 271 -55. T. DEVELOPMENT REViwW 88 -37 - UTMAN- MACDOXALD & WRTNERS - The development of a two -story 26,265 square fact u. ice building art 7.09 acres of land in the Havert Avenue Overlay IN$trict (Subarea $)* located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Acacia Street - APNt 209 - 401 -01. r I� A�ireeaor's'Torts f X. Conx sSdan Businese XL PubIIe Comments 7`his is the time and Place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. XIL Adjemmetgt 1 The Planning Commission hds adopted Administrative Regulations that set an II p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall ba heard only with the consent of thr Commission, i i i r7 VICINR"fY MAP i ONI41110 I1111t'KIRTION4L AMPDXr c -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA .' STAFF REPORT Y DATE: December 14, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FR(ft Brad Butler, City Planner BY: Chris Westman, Assistant Planrer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIr -W 82 -34 - propota to develop a rw - enan off ic -i ranu acturing I cot" lex on 2.96 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7), located on the southeast corner of Elan Avenue and White Oak. APN 208 351 -62. i I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Issuance of a Negative Declaratior. B. Surrounding Land U_saand Zoning: North -vacant; n us r .a1 -Park (Subarea 72 South - office Buildings; Industrial Park (Subare4 7) East - Vacant; Industrial Park (Subarea 7) West - Vacant,, Industrial Park (Subarea 7) C. General Plan Desi nations: l ajc us r a ark North - industrial P.:rk- South - Industrial Park East - Industrial Park West - Industrial Park D. Sits i-naracteristics The site is currently vacant and void of a!iy s'i neave-gation. off -site improvements (curb and gutter) have been completed. The site slopes gradr.411y from north to south. E. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Proved Office 28,380 1 /250 114 116 Manufacturing 13,125 VSOO 26 ?.8 Total TU "T PLANNING' MISSION STAFF REPORT DR 88 -34 - C.P. LANGE Detembct^ boy 1988 Page 2 ,I, ANALYSIS:' A. Gene-al: The propesed use is in conformance with the goals and e e►opm�nt standards of the Industriai Area Specific Plan and is consistent with surrounding uses. The project has been reviewed by the Technical and Design Review Committees, After environmental 41earance, final approval of the prole ^,t will come through the City Planner with the appropriate conditions and special conditions. B. Design Review Committee: The Coaetittee {MeNiel, Eaerick, Calemani reviewed the pro ert on November 3, 1988 and directed the applicant to address the below listed concerns and return to , ca mittee for further review. The issues were: �e P1 an 1. Planter areas should be increased on the north side of Bulld`ag "E" in order to increase screen4ig of the roll -up doors. 2. Textured paving accents should be in the same color as the roof material. 3. The site plan should be revised to provide a building focus at the in"ersF^tion of White Oak and Elm thereby reducing the amount of parking on Elm. 4. The Committee preferred a reduction in the number of compact spaces. 5. Details of the hunch court should be provided. Architecture 1. The "blank" rear wale of Buildings "C ", "U ", and "E" should be broken up. Brick banding or columns were discussed; however, the applicant was given free range for a solution. The applicant redesigned the project to meet the concerns of the Committee and resubmitted fo►- review. The Committee (McNiel, Cnerick, Coleman) reviewed the revised project on November 17, 1988 and recommended approval. G. Environimental Assessment: Parts I and II of the inir; i Study have been comp e e and no significant adverse impacts have been identified as a result of this project. PLANNING COMISSION VAFF 'REPORT DR 88-34 - C.P. LANCE December 14, 1988 Page 3 f i III, FACTS FOR FIMINGS: The project use is consistent with the General Plan annn'Indust Area Specific Mar,. The building design and site plan together with recommended Conditions of Approval are in compliance with the Industrial Area Specific Plan. The prol;ect will not be detrimental to the .:health, safety, welfare, or ma ally injurious to surrounding properties. � r IV. EC RDAM c Staff r+ecpmmends that the Planning Cowl%sion ssue ve Declaration for Development Review 8844, spectf EAittedn rad Bull City Pla her C BB: Mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - W-ttian M--pr EXMbit "8" Site .Man Exhibit "C" - Elevations x rt . i f lo 4.0 ,» it ii t,,ill1j 11 {I I � III I I � � j � '►_ tj Y II ff ' it 11 ' " y�" f 1 fili � / //• {'air -v4 r � ; i 'l f/ 1 / ` 1 � � i✓' fl !/,ir.7 ssii �—Y 0 IOE 0 tY cc At P Em LA E i , ��bir ;`,,;; 193 yiliVd 5S3Rilsna xM0 A 1� asa F► 1 ._'7 l i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA as STAFF REPORT DATE: December 14, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner, BY: Cynthle S. Kinser, assistant Plasiner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT, REVIEW 38-30 - T�n_ 01 ice 9 acres of land in the industrial Speciic Plan [Subarea 7) located north of A7N: I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPT10, A, Acti z Issuancia of a Neg&t1ve Declaratiot'. B. Surreundi-ag Land Use and Zoaiijg,-- office; Industrial Park North -office; n :1rial Park South jIfice; Industrial Park East Vacent,,Industrial Park West Office; Industrial Park C. Gener �h 1); Ignatioms: 7r—oTe-L nia-ur aT-Par-k North _ 4sirjoil Park South - in;justrial Park East - Irdustrial Park West - Indu.'.rial Park D. Site Characteristics: The project site is vacant and rough graTeB. Curb In gffbr have been installed; however, sidewalk and drive appeoaches have not been constructed. 'Parkin Calculations: Nwnbe,o of Nt niber of Type square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use footage Ratio Required Provided Vff Tc—e 17250 5 Total PLANNING MISSION STAFF REPORT DR 88-30 - CARNEY TNEMOROU December 14, 1988 Page 2 ZI. ANALYSIS: A. gal: The proposed use is consistent with the Industrial °tic Plan and with surrounding uses. The project has been reviewed by the Design Review Committee. The Committee has fcrwa+rded re.ompendations for condittnns or" apprzval.. After environmental determination by tine P nnnin?a C66misv ion-, final approval of the priject will come through the City Plattner with special and standard conditions. B. Dest rt Review C ^aittert: The )mmIttee (E 00,41, finerick, r0Tu 't v esr� �Cd—tffe--; roject on November 17, 1988 and has resona.znded the following conditions of apur ral: The employee plaza areas should be increased to 10 feet by 8 feet. ` 2. The parking lot landscape planter should allow pedestrian access, such as stepping stones. 3. The landscaping planter at the north end of the second row of parking :hs5id be incensed to avoid parking %drive aisle conflicts.. 4. The stucco base on the north and east elevations should be replaced with brick veneer. S. Landscape planters at the front entry should contain 48 inch box trees. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The proposed use is consistent with the Genera! an an 'Bn3ustrial Specific Plan. the building design and site plan together with the recommended conditions of app.-oval are In compliance with the Industrial Specific Flan. The protect will not be detrimental to the public healt., safety, welfare or mai,1erially iM urirus to surrounding properties. Iy. RECtlMEND IOM: Staff recommends that the Planning C%imiss on ss e.a ve Declaration f ^r Development Review 8840, /// Arad Buller City Planner BB *CK:mlg ,.,,a.. lu C'i,ANNINC MISSION STAFF REPORT DR 35 -30 - CARNEY TiitODORW December 14, 1989 Page 3 Xetachments Exhibit "A" - Location MaP Rxhibit "B" Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Elneation i I G w z w w Ili 6 CITY OF OR 88-30 MNCHO CUCAMONGA TrTLN. LoCat"Map PUNNIftG DIVISION V, -LA P-TRIUM "A" amL T've 11 DR 88 -30 UNCHO Ct � `` L'Z: _ : Site Plan WA V f 'iii: 4Ltillii#'. �� wIL wow 16 �1 lu RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION (IF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSIOR OF T14E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM04GA, CALIFORNIA DENYING, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, A REQUEST FOR THE ISSUANCE OF AN ENTERTAINME11' PERMIT, NO. 88-01, FOR EXPANSION OF ENTERTAINMENT AT HARRY CS RESTAURANTMIGHTCLO LOCATED AT 10877 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals, M en �Iune 24, 1988, this Comission adopted its Resolution No. 87-102, thereby approving Entertainment Permit No., 87-01, subject to specified conditions - for a disc jockey doing vocals for dancing in the Harry C s Restaurant on Le southwest corner Of Foothill Boulevard and Spruce Avenue. (ii) %1�n June .7, !988, the Public Safety Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamorga publicly con0jcte4 a hearing to review the reports of law enforcement, fire safety, and relateo, )ublic 'safety problems and reports of expansion of the scope of enteri-Wment, beyond that approved by this to Commission and recommended that additional conditiors of operation he imposed on Entertainment Permit No- 87-01. i-,%j If July 13, this Commission conducted and concluded a duly noticed -ro.,alic hearing to determine whether substantial evidence existed to aupport ee4ocation of Entertainment Permit No. 87-01. 00 On July 27, 1988, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 88-14� modifying the specified conditions of Entertainment Permit No. 87-01. (v) The decision represented by Planning Commission Resolution No. 88-143 was timely 3ppealed by the applicant to the City Council. NO On August 17, 1988, the City Council conducted and concluded a duly noticed public heArinc, on th,� appeal ard rejected the appeal, thus upholding thi3 Commission's �eclsion, (vii) On August 21, 1988, Harry H. Chan filed an application for a new Entertainment Permit No. 88-01, which proposed expansion of the nature and scope of the entertainment. HereinaftEr in this Resolution, the subject Entertainment Permit No. 88-01 is referred to os "the applitnion." (will) Ca September 28, 1988, this Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on Enteftainment, Permit No. 88-01 and contin�ied said hearing to Wovember 30, 1988. (k) All legal prerequisities to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred� ITE14 C PLAtN'dM C0Wl$, ;1QN hSOLUTION NO. December 14, 1988 Page 2 8< Resolution. NOW. THUEFORE, ;t is hereby found, dv!emiiAd and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cu�:a rnga as W ltwsz, 1. This Co isslon NRrtby specifically fines that all of the facts set forth in the Part A, of thiscsa7tian tire true and correct. 2. Based Lpon subxrartial lf:vidawce, including written staff reports .aid further testimonial and written evidence presented by the Sheriff's 0eparv,:ant rand Fiat` :.1 Fire! Protection District'dxving the hearings described in Ue Recitals, Part ��. IA40ve, this Cc issiran t ;,reuy specifically finds as fol ",)Ws: a. The application €+pplfes to fro_` rty located on the southwest csrw: - mf Fool;W. Soe,evard and Spruce A.verue,, and is ,.urrently developed with k. t -astaurant/'nightclub that is currently approved fo= an Entertainment Permit No. 87-01 for a disc Joao doing vocals for dancing nightly; h. The application contemplates the significant expansion of the Ifature and scope of e;Etertainment to incl \1db live comedy acts, � sports celebrity promotions, lip -sync contests and hair and clothing f4;shion shows; a. That the conduct of the establishment has resulted in violations of Condition No. 4a of Planning Commission Resolution No. V -102, and violations of Rx.ncho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 5.12.104, subsections (2 ), (4), and (5) , have occurred sine the adoption of Planning Coamission Resolution No. 87 -102, contrary to the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the public. 9. Based upon the substantial evidence presented Vr chis Commission and upon the specific findings of fact set forth in paraq -.Ohs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. That the conduct of the establishment or the granting of the application would be contrary to the public health, t fety, morals or welfare; b. That the premises or establishment is likely to be operated in an illegal, improper cr disorderly manner PLANNING COWISSION RESOLUTICR NO. December 14, 1989 Page 3 c. That tht grant ng of oe application wOUld create a public nuisance. 4, Used upon the substantdal evidence presented to this Commission ar4 upon the specific finding;.- tet forth it paragraphs, 1 Z ant' 3 above, thin Comission bc.,,by denies, w1thout prejudice, the application for Sntertairwnnt Penxit No. 88-01. S. The Setre£ary',',of this Commission shall certify to Uz. adoption of this 8ssolutiivt. APPROVED ANa ADOPTED *,, ,TS 14th DAC OF DECEMBER, 1538. PLANNING COMMISSION W THE C411 'OF RANCHO CUCAMOK-A BY: -- a °ry T. Mel , .ta aWn " ATTEST- Bra3 auDer, ATTEST- Secretary I, Rrad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Comission of the Ci4 of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby cdrtf -fy that the fmgoins- Resolution ass, duly and regularly introduced, passed, rind adopted by the Planniig Commission of Oe City of Rancho Cucamongii. at a ra ular mettind,,os the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of December 1988, by the follOwfRg vote -tD -Wit. I AYES: COM1ISSIONERSa NOES: COM�ISSiONEP.S: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.MONGA STAFF REPORT ... DATE: December 14, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commitsicn FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Beverly Nissen, Assistant Planner SUBJ6CT: ENYIROWENTAL ASSESSMENT' AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 139A% - TfA'TIUR " A reMdentlal suiRivision and-design review a s a. a family T,)ts on 15 acres of land in the tow Density Residential 013trict (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) of the ES iwan,da Specific Plats located on the south side of Highland, east of East Avenue - APN: W-071-018. Associated with the tract is Tree Removal P0mit 88 -64, requesting tiro remoV0 of 110 Eucalypt=-gs globulus (Blue Gun Eucalyptus), + This item has been continued from the November 30, 1988 Vianming 1 Commission w.eting in order, to allow the applicant the opportunity to return to the Design Mview Committee to discuss the utilization of side -on garages.. Al tern ves were �crated to the Design Review Cosmittm on December 8, 19 . St ff w I give the Planning Commission an oral sport on any mod$ ication an t. recammendations of the Design Review Co mittee; i Re pectfui s itt4:d, Brad Sulier 4k; � —� City Plana 88:8N:vc f Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report of November 30, 1988 Resolution Approving resting Tentative Tract 13948 with Standard Conditions Resolutions Approving 'Design Review with Standard Conditions CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 30, 1988 TG: !,airman and Members of the Planning, Coasnission FRrA: urad Buller, City Planner BY: 8everl,; Hissen, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 134'i res n a su v son Rd-7-de-sign re icw o sfi a family lots on 15 acres of land in the Lot, Density R,isidential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan located on the south side of Highland, east of East Avenue - APH: 207 -07I -018. Associatt-d with the tract is Tree Removal Permit 88 -64, requesting the removal of 110 Eucalyptus glol+ulus .(Blue Bum Eucalyptus). I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of the subdifision design, conceptual gr6diag plan, building elevations, plot plans, Tree Removal Permit 88 -64, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Project Density: 2.83 dwelling units per acre. C. Surroundina land Use and Zonin North - g _;+ venue an a proposed Foothill Freeway bey +nd. South - Vat+ar (approved Tract 13063); Low Density 4sidential District (214 dwelling units per lyre) East - Vacant (approved Traat 13063); Low Density Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) hest - Vacant (propb�;ed Tentative Tract 14142); Low Density Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) 0. General Plan D__e__s__ g_q�nat�ii ons : Project e o Tiv sideenntial (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) North - Highland Avenue, Proposed Foothill Freeway South - Low Residential (2 -4 dmllieg units per acre) East - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) West - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) E. Site Characteristics, The property is currently undeveloped wi 5 an average s ape of 3% fraal north to south. No existing buildings are located on the site; however, a citrus grove is to a El 1C :J El PLANNING C"ISS1ON STAFF REPORT VTT 13945 - Citation November 30, 1988 Page 2 present in addition to several Eucalyptus windrows. This proposed tract iR an extension of the proposed Tract 13063 which is located to the east and south. North of the site is Highland AvenL42 and beyond that the sita of the proposed Foothill Freeway. West of the site is a proposed single family residential project (Tract 14142) which would be the logical extension of this project and Tract 13063, 11. ANALYSIS, A. General: The applicant is prrposing to develop. 35 single am y ots on 15 acres of land. The lots range in size from 13,360 to 18,216 square feet with an average lot size of 15,133 square feet. The same elevations, flror plans, colors and materials are proposed as those which were approve, Yar Tract 13063. Four floorpins are indicated, ranging in size from 1,820 to 2,777 square. feet. Two of the models are two stzvy and two models are one story. Each of the floorplans lave three elevations, with Plans 1837 and 2355 Raving been modified to incorporate detazhed garages on corner lots. 3. Oes_ig_n_Review ComAittee: The Dosiga Review Committee Kroutil, 'Chi t� ea, —Fm `ier cki revs d t; a proposal on July 21, 19P$ and rerommerded that revised plans be resubmitted which would address the foiluwina concernsz 1. All proposed stone veneer should be replaced with real river rock. 2. Plan 2 should incorporate the icycreased use of brick, 3. Architectural detailing should be wrapped aroun the sides of the buildings for a distance of approximatwly three feet. 4. The :.Gpt of 360o architecture should be utilized on all models. 5. The chimney on 'plan 4 should be redesigned to he more il scale with the house:. 6. A lanascape plan providing "stree side landscaping" ,Ohould be reviewed by the Design Review Committy Th.e &ppiicant then returned to the Design Review Committee (Blakesley, Chitiea, Kroutil) on the consent calendar on October 20, 14988. O -B PLANNING "ISSION STAFF REPORT dTC 13945 - Citation November 30, 1988 Pago 3 The Committee approved the streetside landscaping concept and the changes to the side elevations of Plans 2 and 4 which included the use of an awning type Clement over the window. 'he &imney ov. Plan 4 was redesigned and approved by the Committee. The applicant proposed to omit ^-ny stone veneer from the elevations and substitute other building materials. The use of the "Brown tobblef'fid" element was approved. The Cmittee had the following recommendations: 1. The concept of 360(' architecture is to be used ox r11 elevations, with architectural detailing (i.e., s•;d1ing) being wrapped around the sides of the building for a distance of approximately three feet. 2. The use gf "Wisconsin Heather Edge" veneer was not approved. 3. Real river rock should be used on some elevations in order to tie in with the sound wall along Highland hrenue which incorporates rock pilasters. C. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Comittee reviewed the pr oc on u y 12, 1988 and approved it subject to the conditions listed in the attached Resolution. D. Tree Removal Permit: The applicant has subvitted a Tree cMova erm app cation, requesting the remover of 110 Eucalyptus globulus (Blue Gum) tree_ in conjunction with development of this tract. in addition, approximately 160 orange trees have also been slated for removal; however, fruit bearing trees are not subject to tip Tree Preservation Ordinance. The Eucalyptus globulus are located primarily in ivio east /west orien e w M see xhibit V). An additional windrow is Located along 'Highland Averme and is also proposed to be removed due to the widening of this street. 11 An arborist report has been provided ar part of the request. The report evaluated the trees regarding their overall health and all fell into one of the two following categories: 1) "That the condition of the tree proposed for removal with reference to ser;ously debilitating disease or danger of falling is such that it cannot be r,.isedied through reasonable AVL preservation procedures and practices. ", and 2) "That conditiwr, of tree indi6l es need for extensive aorrect;ve maintenance MW a,Ith no assurance it will survive construction irsp t." All trees recommended for removal by the arborist exhibit one or more of the following: advanced stages of heart rot, identified pests such as borers, termites and plant. parasites, PLANNING COMISSION STAFF REPORT YTT 13945 - Citation November 30, 1988 Page 4 bark roc, severe root damage, evidence of disease such as exfoliation, leaf scorch and enudations.. In addition, a clump of scattered trees located south of the main windrow shows evidence of burn &.ad are all extremely weak and stressed. Based on the above information, staff recommends tFat the existing windrows be removed and replacement windrows be required per the requirements of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. E. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Infzial Study "as been coe°- p—lete3 by e app can Staff has cwpletf!d mart II of the Environmental Checklist and identified tha,: ,he proximity of the site to the future Foothill Freeway may rtsult in excessive noise levels along the northern portion of the site. 1aa applicant has provided an acoustical analysis addressing the potential noise impacts. Based on the r<-4Its of the report, the following mitigation measures shop , be implemented to reduce the noise levels to a less than -,i,Ywificant level: 1. A six foot wail Mould be placed at he top of the slope along Highland Avenue. A flanking Mail, perpendicular to lots 25 and 27 may be required If the boundary along Highland Avenue does not continue westerly at the djacert tract. The barrier should be a continuous structure without gaps or gates and should be constructed of a material that is impervious to noise (e.g., concrete block, stucco -on -wood, h" plate glass, earthet. 1)erti, or any combination of these materials. In order to comply with current City policy and, at the same time to reduce the noisy levels to a less than: significant level, staff recommends that a decorative masonry wall be located along the northern tract boundary, III. FACTS FOR FINDIMS: The project is consistent with the General Plan and Code. The project, with the added mitigation measures, will not be detrimental to the public health or safety, or cause nuisances or significant adverse environmental impacts. In addition, the ,proposed usa and site plan, together with the rec ymended conditions of appvoval0 are in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, Development, Code, and City standards. IV. CORRESPONDENCEt This item has been advertised in The Dail�Rey�ari newspaper as a public hearing and notices were sent Leo a7i- propery owners within 300 feet of the project site. PLANNING C"ISS10N STAFF REPORT VTT 13445 Citation November 30, 2988 Page 5 V. V7e Staff recommends thet the Planning Commission app Tentative Tract 13945 through adoption of the tion, -approve Tree Removal Permit 88-84, and issue a ation. Re eed, Brad Sul r f - City P nner BBs N:vc Atta --We z: Exhibit : "k" - faster Circulation gal# Exhibit "B" - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "C" Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Conceptual Grading Plan j Exhibit "E" - Conceptual- Landscape Plan Exhibit "F" •• Building Elevations Exhibit "G" - Tree Locations Resolution of Approval With Conditions, 0 i i I � � 1 J�rL.la"il: Loll 1 � , fT.MM WN sc f t iWd- a, CITE' OF MIN: v-rr I el RANCHO CL)CA.MGNVA Trlu-A�10** LAW PLA,NNI% [XVF" EXHIW. SCALF.' a i i CITY CF i f PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT- . SCALE. _ 1 riN cs r �a -F., 111 in it 11 I� CITY OF ITEMt VTr 15 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TnU: T FLAW D :ar<sto�atm�tma;attr„a 1a '— a A — ......w -si �� do�rs`s. et..+.��t� rr�rnia�v:eG..•+s•a+ ar, i 1 �aa F L as r•s� !�_}� 1 yo q 3 -a4 Spa i'r 1 _ ii►y_ t } 1 1y''_. 41 r — sr ,x, h -..� { a n llr a t T u 1 41 i Igr u� rr fit 7 ms ( �. t t r r Ildluti 6f6i9 gNii.Y •>p te11GtIFRttl� =RA ntL/�'BtB�'�'. �' A1�1{.?IIY T•Tt Yi�_'6S • i Num 1 CITE' OF rrENt.- �' RAN CM CUCAIMQNGA a ►.NNI a 1 5n goon pfNG1N6 IN ALL 5IDE! i RMA l ReO5 mm J�Lp(,K Wpu, W1fllLl!,MA5 WON6 Yldih4AND AVE. j t)ECORAtrVE Mh5oNxY L.,F mDScAPJMG 50ALL AL50 06 PAOVIDBP. SU�.Ii✓E ''fa p�svjt;. f #,, APPROVAL VY 64 Y UNMf6 W(MVPXW REP'L&TWSIV;' A WM� ftH(.A9DokVP-. APIQU1FZD -� 6 vit6 WimoAowS %Au- tE Wf -AcaP PUNNING D . IS: EXHIMT- SCALE- i 16 11 FRONT PLEVAT!GN RIGHT SIDE LEFT SIDE 2e . IT' OF RANCHO r O C�*i, AMONG A b - 1� ,Arch►�t, W21A a -I�u �l ,{o �Y, ?rovldlk cn a(i &Va yvv . pC,pqt TITLE - -Gaa• SLEVATiDU--) EXHIBM _.�. L SCALE: Wtv Kj Intl 11 d� gY1t1f A pe JE a' ira( Ht; -7. oEbeNgm M- CUC-kM(X4_iA TITLE= , . PLANNIN,X3 DIVSON zxHlur, SCAI.E- ld .ice low 110� ZN �17 AMk t, w t' 11 ,1 11 "d Ili 11' 11 1 11 • ti � i 11 11 ii ii u It, ' I i 1� " P :rH CITY CF FrEM: PIANNM DIVI&QN EXHrINT: .LE-.. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTIOW OF THE PLANNING CO{s%fISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT' MAP NO. 13945, AND RELATED TREE_1EMOVAL PERMIT 88 -64, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION AND DESIGW REVIEW OF 35 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 15 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2 -4 DWELLING U''.•ITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWAQA SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF HIGHLAND AVENUE, EAST OF EAST AVENUE, fND MAKING FINDINGS IN SSUPPART THEREOF - APN: 207- 071 -018 A. Recita ?s. M Citation Builders has filed an application for the approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map 3o. 13945 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as the application ". 0i) On the 14th day of December, 2948, thg Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the appl'ca�j n and concluded said hearing -on that dite. (iii) All legal prewequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by t,.ha Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamoaga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon s'lbstantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on December 14, 1988, including w.°itten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located on the south -ide of Highland, cast of East Avenue with a street frontage of 990 feet along Highland Avenue and is presently vacant; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is Highland Avenue, the property to the south of that site consists of proposed Lax Density Residential development, the property to the, east is a proposed low Density Residential development, and the property to the west is a proposed Low Density Residential development.. (c) The prog2rty contains 110 Eucalyptus globulus< trees which have been determined unsuitable for preservation by an arborist report. _tea . PLANNING CCMMIS5I0N RUOLUiION NO. VTT 13945 - Citation I{uileers December 1A, 1958 Page 2 3. Based upon tide% substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon she specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows. (a) That tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development rode, and specific plans; and (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely vo cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wild[ife or their habitat; and (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at tars, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviea:ed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission Kireby issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Vesting Tentative TTM-a4 13945 1, No building permit shall be issued For the construction of any building or structure within the bGUndaries of the subdivision until the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall have received a letter from time Chief of the Foothill Fire Protection. District that a gill community facilities district has been formed pursuant to the qP provisions of the "hello -Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982," as amended, to Fr^ride for the issuance of bonds to f fiance the construction and equipping cf a fire station to PLAWNG COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. VTT 13945 - Citation guilders December 14, 1988 Page 3 serve the properties within the subdivision and the levy of special taxes to secure the payment of debt service on such bonds and to pay for additional fire protertion and supprs,;sion services, necessary to serve the properties within the subdivision. ?• An in-lieu fe,k as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing nverhaad utilities (teiecommuviications and electrical) on the opp- site side of Highland Avenue shall be paid to the city prior to approval of the Final Map. The feE shall be one -half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the project frontage adjacent to Highland h�enj�e. 3. Storm drain fees shall be paid prior to recordation of the Final Map per City Ordinance 286. 4. The developer shall participate in the required improvements to Victoria Basfn as required by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District and the City Engineer. 5. The developer shall provide storm drain facilities and protection measures as determined by the final drainage study to protect the site from flows from the north. 6. Construct Highland Avenue full width frcm East Avenue to the east bnundaNy of Tentative Tract 13063 to the east, the developer may request reimbursement agreements to recover the costs of constructing the improvements and acquisitioni of the necessary right -of -,way fronting Tentative Tract 13063 and fronting the property which extends from the west project boundary to East Avenue at the time of their development. The developer shall construct full intersection improvements Including traffic signals at the intersection of Highland and Cast Avenues to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The developer shall receive credit and a reimbursement for the improvements and necessary right -of -way acquisition from the Systems Develops -et Fee if approved by the City Council. If not approved by the City Council, this condition shall be waived. 8: The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off -site property interest necessary to construct the required off -s'te improvements. If the developer should fait to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into are agreement With the City to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such tine as the City acquires the property interests required for the improvements, Such agreement shall nrc.ide for payment by developer 3f all costs incurred by the Clty t, acquire the off -site py- operty interests required in __ D PLANNING Ci'.MhiIS3ION RESOLUTION NO. YTT 13446 - Citation, Builders Recewber 14, 1988 Page 4 be in the form of a cash deposit, That poWan of the security retl ecting the value of the required off -site property interest shall be the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by oevele er, at developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approu,i by the City prior to tommencemQnt of the appraisal. 9. The deie; oiler shall construct off -site street and storm drain improvew_rcts to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Street Improvements shall be full width except for parkway Improvements. Both street and storm a'rain improvements shall conform to the requirements for Tentative Tract 13063. 10. The developer shall construct a temporary emergency vehicle access to Highland Avenue. 114. The project shall contribute to the further• construction of the Etiwaoda /Sari Sevaine regional drainage /flocd control facilities by forming or annexing to a benefit assessment nr a community facilities district or by the payment of regional drainage fees as established by the City Council. Fam -stion or annexation or fee payment shall be prior to Final Map approval. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1998. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: arty T, McNiel, a rman ATTEST: —"Bra Buller, re ary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamrnga, at a regular meeting of 'isae Planning Commission held on the 14th day of De:ember, 1988, by the following rote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT COMMISSIONERS: LA s 4 ' u0. a »uW S kBSw'L'`�w•�M i w'yw OR-RVlf.�^ 6w � cv'�ae •"•SY��t a Mai 12.N..,,I 4 L M rot s V S4(YYyy rNY.rpi ;;;eeeY •k�• Y3�W W ^" y�.� i.'". v as RYA 3 R W D N � V u a� 0 tfna! Poor Quality Vi a$ h' all :1 5'°$" wA a.i �eq• WY kYom-'% Inn -r� d" »� g =�� ea 8 % Y ;p MT, yy 1yr y. u 6 M ITO p Y <n.• l� �liiiAu v k' M 4 h+ 4 i Y hit K es a vt F Z Y a W Y s � � M W a a �y NNYY V N � ts its _w r L ti �� 9 a~ If q .S f! Ij R v k' M 4 h+ 4 i Y hit K es a vt F I ! ynnc-��ypU4° p yC V c CY'i+y. Ai�p� YYP9paa�.0u V<,O �}�`fi4 �iC4 N a�1i� rf� G$ 9q „ L 71 1133 X fill W Cw *.i± &.R *�.i . a x Q. 1OM IL U S1.C.��Y.. «[{na L wz�.i33 +jl ^ °+a�1 �y+• yy ?� ApppyT A Q � Kph L�4 ^ ^yP�a1y.Y Nom' ~'K��'��'�fJa �w N1N.'O�_ YL AMV � ��CY�• 4i1 A��L��pw Y V� � ~+u ~ i N11 �'fjw v--; Fv Qw �"l^ Li g�M ✓� 43 �3-Q 3 ai0 wti � Fa,���.M c P+� fq�s�]]MM��� �• g p.g Kq` a rj;! ^ i m 1 i M JAI U T Pas= L. ^ N N tow I��.',e � � u M1L�,�.a "I � 4i 4" ml "fir �Lqr: .5 1 «y ^o «LS ~wv �u�1' ow<"a s.. �°• Y� 'Fra.+i p M q�. �g@ 7 a N�.ga� !y��L�Al ^�r��,. C S; aay++ �p i Ri4b �Pp �� ('AM •� ���Me.�M��w. <iY� <:K Y,6 w��;M 9y Ay 4d Yy. #?PNy�4 .ya ^ �Mg�Oxisp+`.� 6a V ^]p »4 >Nw +�o-TF�� .`.y �u6y¢N�'g"�'�d°e�H'�tad, �.q��•�LC��. ILA a 1� ^.K.q VI� Ku �.Vvt q� Mu+®. �, `�s4t��. rim. .�i i. o N. 6 w M e D n a 00911 al Poor Quality p k0�& g0 � ^6 �"GGiV VsCGCp�.C.YIbLL•H + =YYC � 9 td�y D. N NE ^'O� NLyS W� « - Q O1L pq0 ®� 6'2L {�° �r{{{g.��u ,R L �pDy �YV�i •�T4 (,. N ■YN6 C C C 4.V f.V. /p�,6 L is �6u+ y$' � W3Nw`oo�NOu��.a^Y� Be IJ` QQXYMI 4�' , -1 Si � Yw`�i<V e��Cc �' 21� l.gG �Q a� ^Y gpVQa °l'Wy�''.Be •�0C 4 i App N cc L M �1 r Ell �N iSN y� YUyiprl 4j «.N y� + ". iC�.r«s. � oyYw L'0q^ eeN M w a,.Y v i w G ��`oj$/ qw 6 ! ^�«i N01 «~pMii� y� ry �r� .�L� O �aNtl ^OIO��Y �1 �^ � .�X�.op�•. LO L Nx wL w^N..Oi ppyuYYY ^az ^ ✓: VI�M�W Sq� w:N SN'O HqB' iN Yl�� >�J4 N6G <Aa• ` <Y Il. N «pert :e� -e9 '~ca Yat`a v aas vvit.- S'}is a'4 w °� pYw^ .. �i�i Wig= �3 z+�na 'a'.Y ^mod �o °A ^ •? ��! "i as �AIm eN rE IL «° ea Yo Q. 1*1 I. .I = a N.!gg gar, }Q 4. R Asa $ + � N � ■ �,.". y (S « C � nyi r '�+' � �� � V �'�N� N i' '" a vtle = r N� O wGYO 00e w^s 54 S. It « 9v VZ �N�« '.N ~`■GM1yb V 4p y � Y6 i YV.O L1 . y wM .�M n N 4 �«y� •N 0, 1 �M: r�rr a Y O •LyO�.. j: � _«i`�C.._ ; �Yy �`g ^ 4 «wMi` O� ' • + Y b @r^ GV N+ .y O C■q Q > atY - = MV i Y p g`� :� 93 pN 4My. .A 6t cmi GSt m.3- N' CI M � T W p+ a NN �... + �'■�'^ ^,V'�� 1� C w c Y Y q pp N i �' i ^i4 Y. ^di VAC � ^i Y � Y CAi �iw. �s L. <•r3N K4y.� i <tlN �-aa <ti 4 SON :. .is As e� 6. at L53N.2 ci �- - W M 1 n LyN u�p E L a$°. ^ 9 Y ,c° N � ^C � A w W CY 111 4M w �YbbbYDD `+.n S c 8i C 6 Y Y GG33 all &Zi�; ua ,$za V Q a!Y u ecC w` O4 4.�Ly yLy> F �jy1e� �� ^pLN W v�ttttiHHiiila '.� Mt �v�yluQy{r�w vL�.� L '1 ij Mf.�l`�• pLq � �Y Ay 'Q Yew. s,� a.YSJCg Y ' ;. ig v ffi$ ,�a Lai LYE yy n d _ pL..3L3. "NN O.L NVL j, Y• Cyy!`L qCn •e Y9i C� , 1+ � � • 2 L W N� FAY a..2Y avCi w > t F1 N J� F 4 iS A� y C C L M V „ P tiN�N �YY �sA9� N H �`oy�g: 4 Y'YY y w i—f e W NMI C.gtg OYp, 16. :es yar w Mo Y L k ell sg-yyg w )r =i s � A � 1 L }� g� �v ?v N c g L o.► u N r i : SY _emu L . L O1 Y 4_Y i q �� M T. z v+ i G QLPy• is 12 8f ds mm4 !w} M •� O N is ® ° L G Y ♦ C �y Y ` tVY V ■yy ..� V 1Cqi�`■ a� � }l! N. y iC �Y 'AY +%Y w31 : . .`K•6 NY � + i ^W Y � OC � —S ' iu4MN � r M�i . P p . V x . yy i s � V yRN C 1 9.1 i ITS: V¢ An 43 ;1AI1 _4Y 3 Q Oyy ISIS N 2 V 95 7II R 5f aa�ye s S�4i n � 6 4 G S w a O O N w 2,•. Q w.n M i) W 0 e r 5 p� 3 Y Y �py L N r N w LO 4 yy ti y �r o� a w Yt �" 6 N V i W i Y 6 9 i Cy Cy�f IL q+ a YJ N L Y L t8 > y V � O sit; 40 iiY V Ewa' L K ��sQ Ipppp.. Y y N +1P C. tY is L.i rt f�0� OYV� L N `Iy'l 11 'F i E Original Poor Quality 03�x $ wae� - 43 yn x 'El n yS' Y� =phi w s S y l L �N pu nz j � C �~ Q� � �Tqa Yi �Y 4 bin Oy uL � � �ro}�i � q Y •�p ICS's h � M `•{$�'. i € ![� X318 iuvogca 'd }�"�K 3 Fl::.! �Cw: �I 32 A G� OC C J�YI.CY 8 �+3«e.C9�n' BA N i4�Cf Y�y Oal =Rw NEE LC ys -2 Ell $ 7 t Nom' �. � r. Ly ` y 4Y +r• ��jj M� ■ N 4� {`Qc, V,gy ,� �Y � {�,, L� dWA r•r� a Q $ 66 O Y■ 3 y } pp�� ,p r Y I XO O V c b` YY,i4 y.Z« �M Np ..p� i2yyrriN1bA 's«';y CA• y(21 r 9 NY p�•Ti1 Y' C 'JIw�M1. �'a'O T N C i✓ t� L V 1. �• V d + N L� C O: CCC'ja{■�� YY L�•N 0«,,�� �O�iy °p E�y L���iii���iiiFFF.. ry�V'ttNffNb 1W.0 . '•�O'r WrIQ W�y. 70. V�6S < Y.Q? YV <RY. !^T K Y •'i V a O cJDyy Ny yy� 43 t, y y� L 0 V w 7 M D V D par3 w o H ass su` C� V y +l �p,� NY I+. f;L IL YN � �YYM L sN � Dj V � i yL 6 t M�I NM 71 a"K yy C O MK j IL 4Z 4 p CO Y y f ppf� V x b t O a• �� O aYw. �a i y S, Cif L � t i L W I^ CcN O z v L 4i ! a M a .Ta►�yA aa Y y`Ng s� � oa N r AIR age py .Y �V V Tf OW Z �y {S L N tic ^ + 6 L� L �yf�a. �Y yy 4Y U \w N WINL 6, . LOS• fwlP u� >Lp.� �.. MTV ,OYSy }4'N.�yjpwN '�N �V a oi g -f,�:!=p qi ui�yy' sr 6.) `w �M W'. A.w AM yy S Wr.. a 4 sL Y LyY� O y a~fj L D d6 v}3 i A TO yY C �3 5w 0 a gjti w b w �yr yz w eypya l 0 V F E, u -e" E- YM Q..11yQ_fII• 1 y e. y 1p41 ly Q� y 51 1 f o� y9+o yY ono �G +M ANY gcac loviginal Poor Quality 1 0 L N yyV J SS Y O w C V gZw ,Y S=; aci � 6 " Ya N Y i O ✓ 1'+ w Z�w r s��• � 8 w � �w Sr Y N y I EvA Z� p p UZI R . 7 � V C6wq Is =Sail. ILS 6 W &.1 '4 1 N y �c BY M M y Y i w Q Y w+ •_i.y �4 � V « M L L` YN�1 y 8 V y M � w N N y+� a k! IT 0.1 a w N O fL " w ti It Y C Y F� a ey.. ay wL"a YOM wu ? g �IL 0 �s Vpp LJI' y�� It Sitt a w .e = Ike e O ^d V Y y �+ Q d r. � Yr'w : YIL 000000yy Y.d Cii ! vpNL iOY. 1 YAK' }C.�9 r M. RESOLUTION NO, . A RFSOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMOMA PLANNING CON_MION APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR VESTING TRACT NO. 13945 LOCATED ON THE SOUTR SIDE OF HIGHLMD AVENUE, EAST OF EAST AVENUE IN THE LOW RESM31TIAL pISTRICT (2 -4 DWELLIM UNITS PER NCRO, AMP MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. APN: 207 - 071013 A Recitals. M Citation Duillers has fl8u,4 an application for the Design Review of resting Tract 20. 13945 to dezcribed in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter, the subject Design Review request is referred to as ,"the application ". (ii) On the 14ti. ,ay of DecemLer, 1988, tie Planning =:=%sion Of the Zity of Rancho Cucar.+onga held a metirg to *onsidLr the application, (iii) All Te�a1 prereokisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. p 3. Resolution. i NnW, [HEREFORE, ±t is hereby Ycun6, determined and resolved by the Planning CiMission of the City of Rancho C':caironga as 611OKS: 1. Th:t co mis;'ion hereby specifically finds that all of tha facts ;i, forth in the ReciiWfs, Fart A, of this Resolution f.7,e lase and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence; ,pcsented to this Commission and iral the staff rpa rts,, this eo,missi n hereby specifically! 'finds as follows: 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and 2. That Lie proposed design is in accord with the objective of the yzvetopiment. Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and 3. othe pp i design cf the applicable provisions of the Development CndL and 4. that the proposed design, ttgsther with the :onditionP applicable thoreto, will net be de*rlmnnt'? tir the public health, safety, ur welfare, or materially injurious to properti" or improvements in the vicinity. PLANNING C"ISSION RESOU)TION NO. OR :'345 Decenber 14, 1998 Page 7 3. Cased upon the findings any ,conclusions set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the applicatio-a subject to each and every condition set fortl+ belay and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, Design Review 1. The concept c'r 35no architecture shall be used on all elevations with archite^_ +aural Beta ling(l .e.., siding) being wrapped around I the sides of the building for a distance of approximately three feet. 2. The u,e of the brown Cebblefiela veneer shall be allowed. Howc;rr, the kisconsin Weather Edge veneer is specifically not approved. 3. Real river Pock shall be used on some elevations in order to tie in with the sound wail along Highland Avenue which incorporates rack pilasters. 4. The sound wall along the north tract boundary stall be consistent with sppreved Tract 13053 to 'the east and shall be, six feet in height, per the specifications of the. acou,.x d report; 5. Twee pemoval Permit dr -64 is approved subject to µ. :t%Ant windrows, (Eucaly -p'cus maculata) which shall be provided along the south site of Highland Avenue and shall be 15- gallon in size and planted 8 feet or, center. Other rerlizement uindrows within the interior of glee tract shall be planted 8 `eat on center with g- gal Ion Eucalyptu% maculate. Infested wood from cut EucelyptL ..s trees shell be chipped, remaS�ja and burikd at a dump site or tamed to the ground for 0n+ aui six "nchs, ,aalinj the tarp edges wi +.h soil, to pravetds. emery471 borer beetle,, from reinfesting 3th�7 r trees or wood.. Q. All corner side yard wa.ls shall be coast, Led of a decorative masonry material. 7. Front yard setbacks :halt be staggered up to 35 feet it order to provide greater sUatscape variety. 8. Streetside "_ jdskmpinq shfol b�! pn)vided in accordance, with Etiwanda Speeifir s ,an_regtil'emtzntz. Plans shall be r4viewed and approved j. +.'comer prior to the 3ssuanas of building permitrr 4. The Secretary to this* hall certify to the adoption of this Resolution, PLAN:144S 4"ISSION RESOLUTION iNO. . DR 139'45 December 14, iQ?S Page 01PROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14T4 DAY OF DECEMBER, 1988.. PLANNIS- 0WISSION OF THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCMONGA BY: rry , We, . rm n ATTEST: "Ora u er, -Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Cow' sior. of the City e* Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify, that the foreg(�ng Resoi;:tiOn +Ma;s duly end regularly introduced, passed,, iw4 adopted by ,t-�e Planning comission of the City 0 Rancho Cucamonga, at ,A 1'4;filar meetinf o� .the Planning WimiWon held on the 14th lay of December, '1988, by the fUlorrlrry` kote- t�+ =rtif: AYaS: COMMISSUNERS: WOES: COt9 issrokERS: ABSENT, CUSAISSIONE%: V G 9 V P Ovial"al Poor Qu ty LNL 0 w ^V +Ns. 6 _ al a HiAl a gods^ Mirai ,g Sr4grLL W�. GGG � ^CCC�.. Y .yam. Nw� ey y 1 {} y N„ r dpi �,yj t N 14 w Hi •-� >i i j u $ s w k� +Np~gIL ��ffY��Y g 4yi grM �M B, �° Y Y N W v y r Aral d � �'N � 1�I^ Y N. • O � Yp� 1 Tyw �'� •'N� U y� 6a QQ pp J�yyYrYOy��/YAIY ENr 4Y w`w�p a _ u i 39 4. UAW P� p� wq p w m »qL � ^iYlt W N mL ^��wSi$ 7f �'p"� ia�ywfi X :5 wN�,w � Ctai g��pg8o °�g H w,rj CNtlpgyY Y V G 9 V P Ovial"al Poor Qu ty LNL 0 w ^V +Ns. 6 _ al a HiAl a gods^ Mirai ,g Sr4grLL W�. GGG � ^CCC�.. Y .yam. Nw� ey y 1 {} y N„ r dpi �,yj t N 14 w Hi •-� >i i j u $ s w k� +Np~gIL ��ffY��Y g 4yi grM �M B, �° Y Y N W v y r Aral d � �'N � 1�I^ Y N. • O � Yp� 1 Tyw �'� •'N� U y� 6a 111 i W I LILJ saw a o w �a �$Ji" N A .r a x t. 4�V �tl 6 V II.' Vs NN� R V � N Y rt Y N Y v r` N�I' ��' I I 0109, Poor Quolity • O N L " 6 i M pY^Cr ilyy y Y N1 i$3� ��� 7A • N am iN " �► sal° � Y i . Hill 3 s &Y� 41 1#52 � •; 8 A C �a1a •�Vi 's� "bsd Cad NU YYy ""I�• q �4 Vi i ■ �M•+� OMB I u Y4 �8 12k w " Its ��C`r M f\ 6� a 1AI 11 M �B Y 1t _ I.E. � ~ i C4 fa Y i M aH 9 1e - 5. r1� � r « .5_ Y ! z. lit ra :it I «4 !Y «C y ~" 3s s •= ►=fix "r�.. ;t; will, 1tt ��go ..a ate= i" zfi o e « " r j w _ dyy Y q� Yo �C. V ! • ( �y$'t «q a V g« flit � �11�� + ". 'e l•r Y1. VY. •yyyM�I�CI rEvy Y� •_� «�aye�Pd Mal g�� gM _� •�E vS Oq 9 OV6g N��gMSyy GI k ' sy7 y y yyy �y ys 0y1 P riN C4 tMO err NG Ny.. ICY 5 .7 it Y�v.1 5R] a1 M i �s��� M" M �• L s_ b Q i M " V O i u d�oaa` ,I p� 1 N ION aY� ru �� rM f: LM Original Poor MAW � ryI • i ���Nr"UY N� ��Mry. 4 � 4� gib . ;Is _ N Yy � ► g -V d N ii % 4 14 s:. aS a ►��.ui tall+ 'Rai 5 s _ qw N c � I M N ti E ill is vz Nil N N w�F i�pp�pp��,yyN°, ��•pp 'a 3 ��q� y + ^p� r 24���sgNQai i.�x iMrp. it sp Mw 4 ,s SM M ,Q0 t'T! N 02 !1y 6H .i7 rr9 s Q KQ K yN I y L Wb ®N41 �n3t r 'r 1°0 = r IV M r' W b Y • 111. N i n _tgQ 1E r i A Y^ Yr Y N�u 4 N Yss 2L NNppN y N 4 � I sit "I n �Y Y 41 @� y60 1J N any V Y g•- �v W; I � OrJV4 and Poor ovalftv PYyA �Y Y � m �► i�_ ®q war M •;y y Y . : 4'. ¢ —lit N Y Y M � Ia �I �� NJ xi- ip!, tly �pY Y jup M n qgi yN lit e^ 4^ -ll e Y Y Y» �Mr B �yi yg� J _Y Ffid vi I N.� ^•g °�' $ice =M •I.I�� eta lit N, .: 4 -vV � � ^� I:- 21 `® jig7 yL 6 n P w ; Y � •— S' ® MNN M f� � N S� ^ lM�S 6/ s N YYY 11 ■ 415 1 a • iI q� LLIJ � jp• G fl` N •!� " Hg ` I.. @C 4 =1M V .�N' N • ��`���1t Ylj W w� �� �'y 9 +±1� _W nya V MY�Y� = 77X. M � Y� "�i Y .qYi. b C BAs ri ._. p6 � 3:tom Zb21 l' 3J1 L 41 a. ti r �N L s s u r n �Y o� 0 QyY� FI IA iµ31 V 1 N Iq N \A Y d y p I Uzi Y d w �Y all; N ,j « F N w yc V Y T$ O 6 4� Z. d Y Y My ` P M *ems gR� O;,paIIp1 yYy La. Y ,.eaE N�ir LwE� R41 6 N Iq N \A 0 a p sw" �yy �`M q�OlA td�e wa �w^ Yw Mal i`o$Soai`e 7 Y Cam' V+• C ti L� lg1•d Y� � O ff{{{5iiii O r N S� r Oe ec A•�r 9 �fN6sf�� N y pTCy' N W N W 1.i'Y •i 3 0 xi fl�i poor ouattt a Myy Y Y��J V «Y L��i H Yi°i C��4 ;fig°. ' C i6V� N `y Y` w Y s N�•�� �.. �a a¢¢ Yyl, YYY S Q 9,�- Y Aw0 ■ N q. 3 w� L.� yLy � N • C u�:�. t y • N �q v SS ! �` `I R ..• O 4y aC� O. ayy y u � s MI w N 0� p 3 a ®!S q. It �O• St Y Y ag MA gg12 �g • SO 3y Y N ^ ®,Y th m y I Y 03 g°s �d �3ge��yr s a .1 "Is 3% ffi �w�{Sy aS rc- Ci Y El L"J 11- t a ail 'a V L��i Oy�y� tO2�44 LwC O y yYi f. �•qN �1 IR k ll Sot M ! MI A= p 3 a Y El L"J 11- t Ow0 OL N � j3� 5. -1 Ile Iv yiji / Y. e'r 64 L r. sNF °1�, > C LL ye 11 a� Fg p i� it * ° �.i 3 °u` ^'1' ^$ �� �.P. 'Si .S +Imps w^ N 4M^ w aV.f om+apys l . v� V� m. b ayyL�iV � � r� N O«a•� � '� m<�� o g �� ��7 � c, m all! vi 4iN M t i 1 V DL Z V Y v e$ a �( r N e m O N K �r u Y 3 V g �s `o p N L y 60 N N V W N a V m V e�i ^ M m L 53 ±E a., N V 41 m Y�M Gy O all Y_V N 1'1 Y yl K Y M i N ;ss s = Y Nm p w � g Y y pp i- "LL5 O A ` yy Gg N M r gg N y L 'h VNV V aa 10 r� LL V^ 4 S Q ryry L O Y YY kin 'C3 +ck' -S �y � M Y kn 1 s� m� ayd� V a 6Y a 4 �p N Y�yy �O Y � w YYv M a Yea YoL" VS ggg.� r b v g 6 V fIY , 7SA 6Sal Kit $ A �y $ e~µ70e ` � Q w 4 s� N M N��466Gr Rte: Izz F$ fit iRcq - W gx � Y�Y c y s gE� O �P QYp u n Y ty .nod �i M n � w H Y �r a 4R r �p .5 IS sS } or 00SAW ,,944 POOT L% It 9 allOM Its U VA JigV a • � s a o Sri— �f/l U � ♦ C1iQ 4 il'p� Y u N Uo° V ^� I A � • e g �r �MQMy 11 {Y ° i 9�� Tyr ,i L i4 it b' I I I El 11 allOM Its U VA JigV a a Sri— �f/l U � ♦ C1iQ 4 il'p� I I I El 11 e 11 DATE: TO: FROM. BY: SUtis.'ECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG i, STAPP REPORT December 14, 1588 Chrirman and Members of the Planning ConmiW on Brad Buller, City Planner, Cynthia S. Kinser, Assistant kvanner residence to an offke for the Alt2 tow Christian Church on 25 acre, of land in Oe Ver.p Low- fiesidehtial District (2 .dwelling unitspetii, acre), located a;n the wes-. side of Sapphire Street, across from Orange, St ►laet. APR; 1062- 332 -23. 1. BACKGROUND. This item was continued from the November 30, 19988 • an;: ng QWissiun meeting at the applicauis request (see Exhiixfnt "A ") for further, discussion with staff. Staff has mt with the applicant and reviewed the findings and recomw -n ations contained In the attached staff report. As of the writings of this report, the applicant has not requested any modification to this application. Refer to the previous staff report for discussion of this item. 1I. RECOWENOATION: staff recommends the Planningi Cotm4ission approve a. six-mon r '"Upe extension for Conditional Use Permit ,84 -21 co gen urc ma Plan within three 4MVIs. If the Commission upon submittal of a Conditional Use Permit for the concurs, /adopt on the attached Resolution would be appropriate. Brad Elul r % �� City Pi nner 88:C ;m1g Attachments; Exhibic "A" • Letter front Applicant Exhibit "3" ;Planning Commission Staff Report November 3O, 158 Resolution of`-'Ipproval ITEM- 3 t1 S B 6386 Sapphtm Straet Attolrae s, C*ItbmW 51701, �t 7E415'r =6933 • G,r Cava L, phi; +wrr hM h1ovembi;%r 30, 11100 Planning Department City of Rancho Civ;amonga 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701 Gentlemen: The Alta Loma Christian Church hereby requests r, coon - tinuatron of the time extension for Conditiunal Use Permit 64 -21. We request this contiloation for further consultation and review of the Planaing Staff Report and Recommen- ation. We eesire further discussion with the Planning Department concerning .these items. S i' ►rte David L. McClary r F 4 'ter v L _. .r the MW is �* •' ,� = CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 30, 1488 TO: Chairman and Members of the .canning Commission FROM: Brad Butler., City Planrier BY: Cynthia S. Kinser, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR AND MWIFIC,ATION TO CONDITIONAL USF FERR - ILAN CHURCH - reques o convert" existing !, square ,b'o single family residence to an office for the Alta Coma Christian Church on 25 acres of land in the Very Low- Residential District (2 dwelling units per acre), located on the west side of Sapphire Street, across from Orange Street. APR: 106i.- 332 -23. I. BACKrROUN* At its meeting of Not - -per 28, 1984, tits Planning ommmisssiUr - zcproved the Conditional Use Permit 84 -21 for the conversion of a single- family residence to an office which expired on 0. °ber 28. 1,088. Subsequently, the Cowissio,. appmied two one-year time extensions which expire on November 29, 1968. ine appli ^ant is requesting that this time extension be approved for an indefinite .period (see Exhibit "A "). II. ANALYSIS. On April 27, 1983, the Planning Commission approved Conditioial Use Permit 83 -04; a master Aran for the development of a church on the adjacent property (see 8rnibit "8"b. The ftrst phase multi - purpose building ras built; however, ttmm extensions were never requester', and the Conditional Use PHrzit expired on October 27, 1984, Conditional Use Permit 84 -21 for the office was approved only on the basis that it .:as a tempor <"y approval that related to Conditional Use Permit 83 -04 granted for the permanent cntdreh facilities on the adjoining property. This Conditional Ilse Permit 84 -21 for the office s approved for a twoyear ;eriod, at which time the conditions require reconverting back to a single - family residence. Therwfore, staff would rec=nead that a new Conditional Use Permit be required for the church site. At this time, there is no indication as to when the church inteno, to proceed further with their future develupmen plans, which would' repuirn the submittal of a new Conditional Use Permit. two- PLANNING COFMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 84-21 - ALTA LORA C4RISTIAN CHURCH November 30, l;Rlc'. Page 2 a III. RECOMENDATION• Staff recommends -the Planning commission aporoVe a sTx --imp extension for Conditional Use Permit 84-21 contingent :.iron submittal of a Conditional UsO Permit for the church master plan within thras months. If the Commission eonsurs, adoption of the Attached Resolution would he appropriate. / Re lly s feet Bra fr C% Planner 88: CSK;ralg Attachments: :Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant Exhibif 064 location Map Exhibit "C " - luster Plan Resolution ot Approval EA 1 � � ��� �� C 't C Bic U Lo4" CAs -' • 6386 Sapphire Street — j Alta Lorna, Califomla 41701 _ 7141489 -6333 David L. MtCiary, Minister October 27, 1988 City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 'I , t1 i Subject: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT EXTENSION FOR AN INDEFINITE PERIOD, NO. 84 -21 Gentlemen: The Alta Loma Christian Church is formally an extension of our fanditionai Use Permit, CUP number 84 -21, for an indefinite period. As discussed in previous letters, the church -fishes tc continue to use our single family residence; as a church office due Itt, our lack of space. A church office is an integral part of any chu- ,.l: ,aad as such the residential dwelling of 6390 Sapphire serves our church as an important accessory structure, which is acceptable in the City's Municipal Code. Refer to Section 17.08.030 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. For the past thrtm years, the residence in question, has been used as a church office and it has not resulted in ar^y problems, with the neighbors or the community. Also, the church membership and employees have attempted to comply with our CUP conditions and we will continue e;o not only proviae a service to the community, but we are trying to be an asset to the City. At present, it is unknown as to how long we will need to use this residence as an office. But, our ultimate intent is to use this structure as a re- sidence. Therefore, we are requesting that our Conditional Use Permit, 84- 21, be extended for an indefinite period subject to periodic review by the Planning Commission as established in the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Section 17.04.0306. �:spectfully submitted, �- ✓ /� Antonio Lopez, Jr Presidesit Alta Loma Christian Church ,r 0 - " mo rr A A rwid r*wkmW fe'Nowshlp where only the We is taught. .•i +•..wv h. Y R i ��. � P:• I w� � wig i e 1 b Imo. \` \ 1 i / `. al CITY OF PLANNING !.' Fs- f S NORTH ITEM.- -- yp TIT1LEo EXHIBMT. SCALE:.,,,. V i II F 1 t A p D w Fs- f S NORTH ITEM.- -- yp TIT1LEo EXHIBMT. SCALE:.,,,. ic t M Y [y ie '�+�' i F i+ i f t Yarf •, +MAY.( �3+. 1s 4•f�r t. +#Y.� (iY� h { - • f * � +•r n..ri.. b .aw Y :l Y, C: I (-K ;. RESOLUTION N0, 84 -135A A RESOLUTION OF 7'AE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MODIFYING C!ADITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 84 -31, A CONVERSION OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE INTO A TEMPORARY CHURCH OFFICE LOCATED AT 6390 SAPPHIRE STREET IN THE VE:tY LOW RESIDENTIAL nISTRICT, AND MAKING F114DINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APH: 1062- 332 -23. A. Recitals. (i) On April 27, 1983, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 83-55, thereby approvin3, subject to specified conditions, Condit ional Use Permit No. 83 -04, which provides for a master plan for the development of a church, including a Phase I multi- purpose /prwschool building, on 4.99 acres within the very Low Residential District located on the west side of Sapphire Street, nod th of Orange Street. Wd approval was granted for a period of eigt•teen months which expired on October 27, 1984. (ii) Or November 28, 1984, this 'ammission adopted its Resolutinrk No. 84 -135, thereb,- approving, subjnt to specified conditions, Conditiane:l Use Permit No. 84 -21, which provides for the conversion of a single famil , residence into a temporary church office within tho Very Low Residential District. A true and complete copy of said Re3o9* aon is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and Is iacorporated herein by reference, (iii) The church diligently pursued and obtained permits and a Certificate of Occupancy on August 1, 1985 for the office conversion at 6390 Sapphire Street. (iv) The Conditions of Approval for Conditional Use Permit 84-21 specified that the office be converted back to a residence within twenty -four months, unless extended by this COMission. On March 25, 1987 and ? hvember 25, 1987, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 87 -39 and Resolution No. 87 -210, respectively, which extended the approval until Nobegber 25, 1988. (v) On October 27, 1988, Alta Loma Christian church filed an application for a time extension for "an inJefinite period" for C�;aditional Use Permit 84 -2.. NO On November 30, 1988, this Commission conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing to determine whether the time extension request should be granted for Conditional Use Permit 84 -21. (vii) Ali legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolutioa have occurred. B. Resolution. NON, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: PLANNYNG COMdISSION RESOLUTION NO, 84 -135A CUP 84 -21 - ALT€ LOMA CHRISTIAN CHURCH November 30, 19!J Page 2 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,:Part R, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based, upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on November 30, 1989, including written and oral Staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission speciff .ally finds that the approval of Conditional Use Permit 84- 21 is directly ~elated and integral with the approval granted for Conditional Use Permit 8' r4, which has expired. 3. Rased on the above findings, this Comissirn hereby modifies Conditional Use Permit 84 -21 by modifyirty Condition, Of Approval No. 1, as contained in Section 3 of Resolutions W. 84 -135, -to read as follows 1. Approval is limited for a period of six (6) months which shall expire on June 14, 1989, at which time the office shall be conver;sd back into a single family residence, unless extended ay the Planning Commission. Said approval is contingent upon submittal by March 14, 1989 of a Conditional Use Permit applica: en for a Piaster Plan for the adjoining church site. 4. The Deputy Secretary to this Comeai ssion shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED M ADOPTED THIS .30TH DAY OF NOVEMBSR, 1988. PLANNING C"ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY., arry T. McNiel, chairman ATTEST: Brad NOW, Wc-retary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 30th dary of November, 1988, by the !'ollowing vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: . CISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: a v RESOLUTION NO. 84 -135 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 84 -21 FOR THE CONVLRSION OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE INTO A CHURCH OFFICE LOCATED AT 6390 SAPPHIRE STREET �'IN THE VERY LOW DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 7th day of August, 1984, a complete application was filed by Alta Loma Christian Church for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 28th day of November, 1984, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above-described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga P'larning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can be _met; 1. That the proposed use is ir., accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is Aak located. qP 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable 'ehereto, will be detrimental to the, public heal6, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to'' propertites or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with eacF of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. j SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the e5MroT nment and is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 84 -21 is approved subject to the fo owing conditions: 1. Approval is limited for a period of twenty -four (24) months and shall expire November 28, 1986, at which time the office will reconvert to back to a residential use, unless extended by the Planning Commission i k _ Jb E Resolution No. Page 2 2. A small sign. shall be posted rt the adjacent parking lot area on private, not public property$ directing and indir-;ting parking for the office use, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3. All high intensity security light illumination from the Alta Loma Christian Church property shall be shielded from the surrounding properties. 4. A removable landscape planter shall be provided.across the driveway area continuing the proposed streetscphi� scheme to the north, in order to detour vehicular use, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. S. The kitchen facilities shall be limited to the employees of the office. 6. Occupancy of the building shall be limited to not more than 20 persons. 7. Office hours shall be limited from 300. a.m. to 6;00 p.m, and 7;00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, and from 9:00 a.m. to 1? Noon and 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. on Sunday. This facility shall .�,,►ot be used as housing for infants or toddlers. S. The applicant shall submit the necessary information to the Building and Safety Division in order to comply to building code requirements and obtain the appropriate permits for an occupancy change prior to operation of the office use. 9. Floor plans of the building shall be submitted to the Fire District for review prior to occupancy. 10. All conditions of,r- 7roval shall be completed prior to occupancy of the off...te. 11. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commisstion, iF approved use has not commenced within twelve' (12) months from the date of approval, per Conditions of Approval. 12. This approval shall run with the applicant and shall become void upon a change of ownership or if the business operation ceases. c t D ri Ir' L Resolution No. Page 3 l APPROVED R D AND ADOPTED THIS 28th UAN OF NOVEMBER, 1984, PLANNING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: avi a e airman .•mil. ATTEST: Ric omen: uepuu ecretarY i I, Rick, Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the Ci-, of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing. Resolution was duly and regu'iarly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commissi'd on the 28th day of November, 1984; by the following vote_to -wit: on he AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, MCNIEL, CHITIEA, BARKER ONOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS STOUT L -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFV REPORT DATE: December 14, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Cynthia S. Kinser, Assistant Planner SUEtiJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 38 -44 - The request o establish a church n a leased space of 30,000 square feet within an existing industrial park on 1.8 acres of land in Subarea 4 (General Industrial) of the Ind;:ustrial Speci "n- Plan 'located at the northwest corner of 7th Street Archibald Avenna. APN: 208171 -45. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Re asted: Approval of a non, ;onstruction Conditional Irs-e—Permit to establish a church with +a an existi►ig multi- tenant industrial center on the northwest corner of 7th Strcat and Archibald Avenue. S. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning,. Noce,' nera. n ustrirl> South - Single Family Residential; Low Residential (2.4 dwelling units per acre). East - CCWD Pumping Station*,, General Industrial. West Vacant:; General industrial. C. General Plan Designations: o ect bite eCenera l Industrial North - General Industrial South - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre', East - General Industrial West - General Industrial D. Site Characteristics: The project site is developed with an existing multi-tenant industrial center. :S ITE�'- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF .REPORT CUP 88-44 - CUCAMONGA CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP December 14, 1988 Page 2 E. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Proposed Church 10,000 1/35 286 70t F. Applicible Regulations-, The Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea a ows c urc es su ect to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The Cucamonga Christian Fellowship is proposing to re`- loci from its existing smaller location within this same center (see Exhibit "A ") im order to expand. The church ,urrently occupies 11,120 square leet and proposes W '9,0, *:ed into facilities to 30,000 square feet. The proposed church will operate it's office Monday through Friday 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (see Exhibit "Br). On Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Saturday evenings from 7;00 pelt. to 9:00 p.m., there will be adult christian education classes. On Sundays from 8.00 a.m, to 12:30 p.m. and 6.00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. worship services will be held. The recreational facilities will be used Monday through Friday for after - school youth progrAms frost 2:30 p.m. until parents- pick up their children. The church has indicated that in the future they will be considering a day care program at this site, which will require the applicant to submit a modification to this Conditional Use Permit. B. Issues: The primary issues related to locating this type of use within an industrial setting are compatibility with surrounding businesses and parking availability. There are a variety of uses within this center, the church will occupy it's own building within the center, and the church has occupied other suites within the center without any compatibility problems, therefor, compatibility problems are not expected. A total of 286 parking spaces are required for a sanctuary of 10,000 square feet (1 space per 35 square feet). There are currently 450 parking spaces located on the site, however, within 100 feet of the building there are only 150 parking spaces. Staff is very concerned that ?`e distribution of parking spaces is such that almost ha:; of the parking is needed several hundred feet away. This could place excessive parking demand on 7th Street during ser +;ices. The Engineering Division will be posting 7th Street for "90 PARKING" in the future. PLANNING MISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 88.44 CUCAMtONGA CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP December 14, 1988 Page 3 During the reek, the site will be utilized for office operations and after school youth activities for up to 40 students. The 70 parking spaces directly adjacent to the building is more than adequate for the during the weekly daytime operations. The Foothill Fire District has raviewed the proposed church and will require tenant improvement plans to bE submitted to the .istrict prior to occupancy. C. Environmental Assessment: U, i review of Part 1 of the Initial Study and completion o Parz 2 of the Environmental Checklist, staff has found no significant impacts related to a church and day care use locating within this industrial center. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Commission must make all the following n ngs n order o approve this application: 1. The proposed use is in accordance with General Plan, the- objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the Industrial Specific Plan Subarea in which the site is located. Z. That the proposed ...,e will not be detrimental to ime paiMic health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Dail' 35!ort newspaper, the property posted and notices sent to -aTT—a-Qacent property owners within 300 feet of the project. V. RECOMMENDATION: If the Planning Commission can support the findings, Mien approval of Conditional Use Permit 88 -44 through adopti of he attached Resolution of Approval would be appr pr ate. C f the Planning Commission cannot support the ne essa�{y fi s, -hen staff should be directed to prepare a solut9jon ial for adoption at your next meeting. Brad Bid7r�W4�( City Plan BB:CK:mTg -3 10 PLANNING COMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 88-44 - CUCAMONGA CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP December 14, 1988 Page 4 Attachments: Exhibit A "' » Site Plan Exhibit, "B" - Letter from Applicant Exhibit "C" - Floor Plan Resolution of Approval, U • • Inland Business Center 1 �a t Rancho Mini Storage S i 35 _ Present Gocatio_ � 1 Iz - o 91 � it _ s I 9 1� 4tY i County l�_ Pad %I- Building ' 1 1 i i i'3 1a If. z 18 1 n 11111:11. �1.�111.. 11 .I 'r 11 �1 .111 it. 111 1 111 1111 7th Street OT Y OF ANC 0 CUCA1 ONG'"' A PLANNING DIVISION 9y 1" ■ 120' Numbers indicate available parking spaces NORTH ITEM: COF 66'4q TITLE: SIT& P EXHIBIT, ► SCALE: ` eee felkwshlp October 26, 1906 The proposed use of the building at 5382, $586 7th Street will be a place of worship and Christian education for the Cucamonga Christian Fellowship, The facility will be used during normal business hours an a church office. On Monday, Tuesday, Wednesdays and Saturday evenings from 7:00 p.m. to 9 :00 p.a., the facility will be used for adult Christian education classes. On Sunday mornings from 8:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. and on Sunday evenings from 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. as a place of worship. The gym would be used as a recreation center afternoons and weekends. The church employees would have little if any #,mpaot on the business park. The church eutrantly has three full time pastors and a gull time secretary. The reasons for selecting this site are as follows: 1. The Inland Business Pask has many businesses and shops. however, no other businesses area open on Sunday and none are open after regular business hours. Therefore, the site has about 450 spacc3 that will be available during weekends and after regular business hours. 2. The area immediately surrounding the site hats approximately 60 parking spaces that are not in use during regular business hours. 3. Our 9050 Archibald mite, which we cLwrrently obcupy, is no longer adequate to holm our congregation. '$he new sitm is within the same business park, and will allow us to continue the excellent relationships that have been developed between the church and the other tenants. CUCAMONGA CHRISTTAN.FELLOhSHIP Steve Fitch, St. Pastor SF /nh PIAWt it'tWARCn. SkkNo"r M it • �M J��N my A•I• dl �. q - �..n.d . ^A4w •�'w�1 � ww.�r � �N7RY e1.0 •Ii..i f!M i s..ef ti wnu � wM � w san � �i 9NY ay wf wa.p.� tit rrwoi 4, 7. �; < z MAw CuRR�seK ' e0 en's'• 1 °r°• f.,. 1rMf IFO �A4lC_ iLl7h 'll�,��.. AdmL F RA %'-'j' C 'NGA PLANNING DIVISION r N^ p N M r 4t�tm��st Q O 4 El ITEM: Cn U-P SS- 4+4 TITLE: EXHIBIT: SCALP: -_ u° 4 4 RESOLUTION M0. A RESOL4` -ION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88- 44 FOR A CHURCH USE IN A LEASED SPACE OF 30,000 SQUARE .EET WITHIN AN EXISTING MULTI- TENANT INDUSTRIAL PARK ON 1.8 ACRES, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 7TH STREET AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE IN THE GCNERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 4), AND MAKING FIADINGS IN ,SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209 - 171 -45. A. Recitals. (i) Cucamonga Christion Fellowstip has filed an application for the issuance of the Conditional Use Vermit No. 88 -44 as described in tht title of this Rer:,iution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subjac€ Condit(..:,al Use Permit request is referred to as "the application". (ii) On the 14# of P._cs�moer, 1988, the Planning Co, sion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a emly noticed public .Rang on the application and conclunc� d said hearii t 9 on that date. PP (iii) All legal prerequisitets to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, "fVF. FURE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning CommisF+ �f tP City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. Th,, , `.sign tereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the nee,,. -s, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upcn substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on December 14, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 9592 and 9588 7th Street with a street frontage of 191 feet and lot depth of 35' feet and is r.vszntly improved with industrial building ani 7% parking spices; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is an office building, the property tc, the south of that site consists of single family residential, the property to the east is a pur4p *ng station, and the property to the west is vacant. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commissilui hereby finds and concludes as foiluws: it PLANNING COWISSION NESOS.UTION NO. CUP 88-44 CUCAMONGA CHPISTIAN FELLOWSHIP December 14, 1988 Page 2 (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Flan, the objectives of tb,- Industr ai Specific Plan and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (bi `that the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto,--- will not i.6e detrimental to they public healih, safety, 'or welfare, or matcrially injurious to properti&; or improv€mencg In the vicinity. That the proposed;;use complies with eac4 apt the applicable provisions of the ind�jstr ;Ai Specific Plan. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has beu�n reviewed and considered in compliance with the �aitfornia Environmental ut,ality Act of 1970 anal, further, thas Ccmtssion hereby issues 'a Negative Ec` arati on. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2, 2, and 4 above, this Comp ssion hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below: (1) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, and all other City Ordinances. (2) If the operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or operati ms, includtintj, but not Timited to noise, the Conditional Use ,PerRit _shall be brought before the Planning Commission for the consideration and possible ten0riatien of the use. (3) Occupancy of the facility shall n6t coasnence until such time as all Uniform Building.Code a—R- State Fire Marshall's regulatioyis have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans s Wl' be- subritted to the Foothill Fire Protection District and the Building anti Sdfety Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. (4) Any signs proposed for the facility shall he designed in conformance with the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance, any Uniform Sign Program for the complex, and shall require review and approval by the Planning iivision' prior to installation. Alk PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 88 -44 - CUCARCNGA CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP December 14, 1988 Page 3 (5) Any day care services to be provided by. the church will require a Conditional Use Permit and compliance with state licensing. (6) Operating hours for public assembly shall be limited to the weekend and after 6:00 p.m, Monday through Frwday. (T) There andllyoutha activities ies iwhicheXwill for church exceedoffice the ayti l abl a parking. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolutinn. APPROVED Ate A©OP 'I-k;u `bHIS 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1988. PLANNING COW.:dSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGft BY: Larry T. McNiel , chairman ' ATTEST: -'"bra u er; cre aty I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancha Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution wa,, duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by tha— Planning Comistlion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Co*'jission held` on the 14th day of December, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES; COMISSIONERS: NOES: COMISSIGNERS; ABSENT: COMTSSIONERS: lo -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 14, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Brett Horner, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT W TENTATIVE TRACT 14150 - WESTERN Areques to subdivM Tract 137 Ii an approve —On-e--70t ,nap consisting of 128 townhomes on 8.66 acres at the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Terra Vista Parkway within the Terra Vista Planned Community into 5 lots - APH: 1477 - 091 -29. ! I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a Tentative Tract Map. B. Site Description: The site was previously approved for the development of 128 townhomes on 8.G6 acres as Tract 13271. The site is currently under construction. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: on August 26, 1987, the Planning Zowlssion approved ei nn�e Tract 13271, a one lot subdWtion for condominium purposes. In addition to approval of the subdivision map, the applicant also received approval of the Conceptual Plot Plan, Conceptual Grading Plan, Conceptual Landscaping Plan, and building elevations. The appplicant now wishes to further subdivide the site into five (5) lots for phasing purposes.. No changes are proposed to the grading, 'landscaping, architecture, or uIrit plotting as approved on August 26, 1987. Exhibit "A" depicts Tentative Tract 14150 and Cie location of the new lot lines in relation to the site plan. B. Enuironmental Assessment. Part I of the Initial Study has been camp e e y e app cant.. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist and found no significant impacts on the environment as a result of the TTCM C .. PLANNING C"ISSION STAFF REPORT IT 14150 • WESTERN PROPERTIES December 14, 1,988 Page 2 III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This -rojec.t is consistent with the Terra Vista Planned Commu hity any the General Plan, and will not be detrimental to adjacent properties, or cause significant adverse envir,,ga:ental impacts. The proposed use, building design, and subd9vision, together with the recommended Conditions of Approval, are in compliance with applicable regulations of the Development- Code and the Terra Vista Community Plan. IV. CORRESPONOENCE: This item has been advertised as a public gearing in -ine 1�'�A;ROrt newspaper, the property has been posted,"and not ces avm ,en sent to all property owners within 300 feet-of the project sites; V. REC"ENDAT N: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission �pproye n ive Tract 14160 subject to the Cot►d .tions of i prorl, .ugh adoption of the attached Resolution and issuanre f a Mega i I Declaration Re ectfu itt , Bra u e �L"►°. City Plan r 86:5N :mig Attachments;; Exhibit "A" - Tentative Tract 14150 Resolution of Approval F b ', s.. Aft ' ►t MY-; s v ,I t t u �,,,,. vim' °c' /� �p F�",� = �;,�- �•�"':_.- �....c ..� },(' a )' `•sy `- .rr T2XTATticE TitAc*T No. 1t150 171 4a Qt1 N SAW" CYCAMM" "W" M "m 9s911Ma1M 51419 K CAMMW. 94- ....n..wa MY9iN�. 1994 4.849 ACM u4 owe 9 LOT& 14ORTH CITY OF ITEM: T T 1415 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLpe p RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COU-MISSION Of THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO.. 14150, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND TERRA VISTA PARKWAY IN THE MEDIUM DENSITY 'RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, AND :BAKING FININGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077- 091 -29. A. Recitals. (i) Western Properties has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 14150 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On the 14th of December, 1988, the Planning .Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All 1sgal prerequisites to the,; adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, T:11r_,EF0R , it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commissiop if the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on December 14, 1988, including writter, and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the northwest corner of Milliken Avcsue and Terra Vista Parkway with a street frontage of 533 feet and lot depth of 899 feet and is presently under construction and (b) The property to the south is vacant and zoned for condominiums, the property to the nest of the subject site is developed with single family residences. The property to the north is zoned for a park and is vacant. The property to the east is vacant and zoned for office park and Neighborhood Commercial" uses; and (c) The subject property was formerly approved for development of 128 townhomes as part of Tract 13271, a one lot map. C--4q PLANNING CPAI.SSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 14150 - WESTERN PROPERTIES December, 14, 1985 Page 2 3 -. Basecg upon the substawhial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upl,an the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph l and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows; (a) That tentative tract is !consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans;; and (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the ..general Flan, Development Code, and sptt� s p;Zlna; and (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed and (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury . to humans and wildlife or their habitat•, and (e) The tentative tract i( not likely to cause serious public health pn),,blems; and .(f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any eat s- nt acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. This Commission hereby finds'and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and. further, this Comiis.,Aon hereby issues a Negatjve Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth ;.c paragraph 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the appl'..ation subject ;o each and every condition set forth below. (1) All Conditions of Approval in Resolution No. 87-1491 shall apply. k The 'Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Rey.: °:.`A. if PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 14150 - WEnERN PROPERTIES December, 14, 1988-" Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1488. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: -Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: grad-Bullers re ►"l i 1, Brad. Buller, Secretary of the Pl.anohlg Commission of the City_ duly and Cucamonga, do hereby certify tha j',t,f foregoing Resolution W,%; j; regularly introduced, passed, and opted by the Planning Caissicic of the k City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a ?Ogular`` +ee iung of the planning :� ssion held he on the 14th day or December, 1988, by AY -ES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: f it CI`1"Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 14, 1988 TO: Chairman and Mem:+ers of the Planning Commission FROM: William J. Silva, Deputy City Engineer 8Y: Joe Stofa Jr., Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 11% - An appeal or Lonnivi 'ps OT nppruva! pc- L ---- --y w — ... i undergrounding, street d"ications and improvements, emergency uc4z ov, and storm drain facilities required for a residential subdivision of 18 single family Tots on 12.86 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (1- 2- dwelling units per acre), located west of —Sapphire Street, south of Almond Street (APN 1061- 091 -03. (Referred from Ncvemiber 16, 1988 City Council meeting) I. BACKGROUND: On September 14, 1988, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract No. 13738. - No objection was made to aa ly of the Conditions of Approval at that Commission public hearing. Subsequently, an appeal to the City Council stating opposition to six (6) Conditions of Approval was filed. No reasons for the appeal were given at the time of the filing. During preparM oo of the City Council Staff Report in response to the appeal, the Developer's attorney submitted a packet of information regarding they items being appealed'. 7kois information was not available in sufficient time for staff to prepare an analysis of the information for inclusion in the Council Agenda packet. The information packet was forwarded to the Council to be considered as part of the appeliant's testimony. It should be noted that the supplemental information packet refers to several additional conditions which were not listed in the original appeal letter. On November 16, 1988, the City Council heard the appeal and concluded that because of the number of technical issues contained in the appeal, the matter should be referred back to the next available Planning Commission meeting to review the supplemental information provided by the appellant. Copies of the City Council Staff Report of November 16, 1488, the Planning Commission s Approukl Resolution No. 88 -177, and the Developer's Supplemental Information Packet are attached. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 13733 - RODINE COMPANY DECE -N-GER 14, 1988 PAGE 2 II. ANALYSIS: The following is a list of the conditions of approval being appealed - reference Planning Commission Resolution No. 88 -177, (copy attached). Special Conditions (under "Tentative Tract Mae): 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, and 10; and Standard Conditions: A6, G1, G6, K2, K5, L1, L2, L3, L7, L10, Mai,. M7, and N1. Based upon a review of the information provided by the Developer and the advice of the City Attorney, it would be appropriate to delete Special Conditions 3 and 7. Condition 3 required-the Developer to construct 2F feet of pavement along Almond Street from the westerly tract boun &,y to the centerline of the Los Angeles Bureau of Power and Light Fight -of -way. The City Attorney has reviewed this condition and coneltided that, because Almond Street is unimproved westerly to Turquoise Street, these improWrments would not benefit the proposed development Therefore, it is appropriate to delete the requirement. Condition No. 7 (Turquoise Street access) will not be needed as noted in the letter sent to the Developer by the Foothill Fire Distert on October 5, 1988. City staff was not advised of the change by the Fire District at the time of preparation of the conditions of approval. A copy of the Fire District letter is contained in the attached Developer's supplemental information packet. For the reasons stated '(n the November 16, 1988 City Council Staff Report (copy attached), sL_ff and the City Attorney feel that all other conditions approved by the Planning Commission are appropriate and necessary for proper development of the project site. III. RECOMKNDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission amend, Resolution No. 88 -177 by deleting Condition Nos. 3 and 7. A Resolution reflecting the Commission's action will be provided on the Consent Calendar of the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission Hearing. Respectfully submitted, William J. Silva Deputy City Engineer WJS :JS :dlw Attachments: City Council Staff Report dated November 16, 1988 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes September 14. 1988 D — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMGNGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 16, 1988 TO: City Council and CiV Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Joe Stofa, Jr., Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: AN APPEAL. OF THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL appeal of s approval per a n na to utility uncle dedications and iMpN :+ements, emergenc drain facilities required by the Pianni residential subdivision Hof 18 single f acres of land in th* ifery Low Reside . dwelling units per ac:-m )J , located went south of Almnd Street (APR 1061 - 09141; { iE TRACT non c `nom' rounding; street access and storm Commission for a ily lots on 12.88 iai District (1 -2 Sapphire Street, I. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recoftends that the City Counci► uphold the planning Commission's decision and deny the appeal request by adopting the attached Resolution. 11. BACKGROUND: C,', septeaber 14, 1988, the Planning Comi'ssion conditionally approved Tentative Tract 18738 (Exhibit "B "). The applicant has appealed six (5) 'Engineering conditions contained in the approval resolution. (Exhibit "C`) as listed in his: appeal letter (Exhibit "D "). The conditions pertain to: 1. Utility undergrounding (Condition 2); 2. Off -site street dedication (Condition 5); 3. Possible condemnation of -iff -situ street dedications ( Condition 6) 4. Emergency Access %Condition 7); 5. Storm Drainage channel construction (Condition 4); and 6. Full width construction of Almond Street (Condition 1A.). --3 CITY COUNCIL STAFt ' 4-PORT TT 13138 - ROOINE COiPANY NOVEMBER 16, 1988 0 item 2, 3 and 6 (Conditions S, 6 and 10) are related, therefore will bet discussed 'together. It is noted that no reasons were given for the app4al nor were any objections raised by the Developer at the Planning Comission Hearing. III. Awd.YSIS: ". Utility Undtrgrounding (Exhibit "E ") - Cond� ition 2: 2a. Sanphire Street The Developer shall pay an in -lieu 'Fee as contribution to the future undargroun0nS of the existing Overhead utilities along .14pohire Street: and 2b. AlAond Street - The Developer shall underground and ,lay a portion of in -lteu fees && contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing eHHgrhtad utilities along Almond Street. This condition is consistent with the cjrrent City Policy (Exhibit 174). All proposed projects with existing overhead utilities fronting their project or 00 the opposite side of the street acre required to either underground the overhead utilities or pay An in -lieu fade according to current policy.. Since this project is adjacent to al utility eaaseellei*ts the undergr4unding was. required to be extended along Almond Street to the first pole 5eyond ttwe centerltne of the: utility easement. The Developer will be eligible to receive one -halm the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelo:ment) as it occurs on the opposite side: of the street. B. Off -site Street Dedications_ and Improvements - Conditions S, 6 and zee; Condition 10 requires that Almond Stetat be tonstructed full width from Henry b rat to Sapphiro Street (Exhibit 06 "). Thit portion of Almond S "trert will trot only servo this tract but *ill also serve as the main access for Trar.•t No. 10210 to the northwest and other future development in the area. Tht City Council and Planning Coniseon have directed staff to require that street,; be constructed full width -.;never possible to minimize future disruptiors to trm V401 1c. a f4r _-4/ CITY COUNCIL STkI -. REPORT Aulk TT 13738 - RODIHE COMPANY NOVEMBER 18. 1988 PAGE 3 The Developer will be eligible for raimbursement of the cost of the north half of the street from future development as it occurs on the north side of the street. Tract No. 10210 has already recorded+ therefore reimbursement for that portion of tha street shruld be available almost immediately. Condition 5 requires that the Developer obtain dedications for the north half of Almond Street in order to construct the full width improvements per Condition 10, Condition 6 states that the Developer sha19 mare a good faith effort to obtain the necessary - Iedications. Hnwever, if he is unsuccessful, the City will condemn the right- of- ,44y at the Developer's expense. It is noted that this action will require prior approval by the City Council. C. Emergency Access Condition, 7: Currently there is only one access route available to Owe project (Sapphire street); therefore, secondary emergency access route was rpquired within the _ isting Almond Street right -of -way extending wsterly to Turquoise Avenue (Exhibit "N"). The portion from the westerly tract boundary to the center of the adjacent LA eurtau of Power And Ligh` Easement (LASP 6 LE) is to be constructed as a fully it*roved n0 f width street incloiding curb and gutter on the south side and 26 foot width paveiwnt per Condition "3% which was not appealed. The remaining portion is only required to be graded and compacted. Recorded Tract 10210, to the northwmst, was also require to construct the same emergency access; therei'-are it may be in place before this tract records, relieving this tract of this requivvnient. 0. Storm Drainage C?iannel Construction Conditinn 9: The Developer is required to construct the Almond Intercept Master Plant Channel (Exhibit "I ") for the protection of the proposed project from flood waters. Ths drainage report, submitted by the Developer's Engineer, acknowledges the need for a channel to be constructed along the northwesterly beundary to intercept storm water from the northwest. Tract 10210, to the northwest, was also conditioned to construct the same Master Plan Channel; therefore it may be in place before this tract records, relieving thin tract of this requirement. It has been City policy to require the installation of i+i v.er Plait storm drain facilities whenever some type of storm drain facility is required in the same location as a designated Master Plan facility. This is tie case along the northwest boundary of this project. The Dd.leloper will be eligible for re{ =abursemrents in accordance with ,;ity Ordinaese. h i CITY COUNCIL STAF, 4PORT TT 13738- RCDINE COMPANY NOVEMBEP 16, 1988 PAGE 4 IV. CONCLUSION: The requirements, as condi'tiored bpi, the Planning Commission, are appropriate acrd reasonable; therefore, the decision of the Planting Commission should b€ upheld by a denial of the appeal Respectfully submitted, RliM:JS': jmb Attachment., Vicinity Map (Exhibit "A ") Tract Map (Exhibit "B ") P.C. Approval Resolution No_ U -177 (Exhibit "C ") Developer`s. Request Letter (Exhibit. "0 ") Overhead 9tilityr Map (Exhibit "E`) Undergrounding Policy Resolution i0.. 87 -95 (Exhibit "F ") Offsita Dedication (Exhibit "G ") Emerger4y Access (Exhibit "N ") Almond Intercept Master Plan (Exhibit ``I ") 7 pe(e�cc( �rnrrr d�(191�'v f G"f,�'tper�" P.C. Minutes I I i i r 1 C E f f 1A w, 1d a: w, i 14 I ilia It j is 04 fd it I M }- 11 0 42 RESOLUTION No. 88 -177 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CC"VISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM M. APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13738, AND DESIGN REVS:* THEREOF. LOCATED SiAlTH OF ALMOND AND WEST OF SAPPHIRE IN THE WRY Lbw RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (LESS THAN 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE). APN: 1061- 091 -03 A. Recitals. (i) Rodine Companies Inc. has filet's an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No, 13738 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in the Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as the application . (ii) On the 14th of September, 19119, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adopt +on of this. Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW., THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Comwission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows-, 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true ana correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Com fission during the above- referenced public hearing on September U. 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as fal',,aws; (a) The s'plication applies to property located on the west side of Sapphire Street, south of Almond Avenue with a street frontage of 580 feet along Sapphirs Street and 465 feet along Almond Avenue, and is presently vacant; and and designatedbfor Hillside �Resident subject thessouthgofathat site consists of single family residential in the Very Low Residential District, the property to the east is single family residential, in the Very Low, Residential District, and the property to the west is vacant and designated as Los Angeles Bureau of Power and Light easeant. 3. Based upon tho substantial' evidence presented to this Comission during the above - referenced public Wring and upon the specific findings of facts sot forth in paragraph I and 2 above, this C0110ission hereby finds and concludes as follows: � __ q' "TY 13973 96 A de SsA.�91 flit RESOLUTION PO. P? '77 TENTATIVE TRACT I.., d$ - RODINE September 14, 19N Rage 2 (a) That tentative tract is consistr:;t with the General iolrn, Development Code, and specific Plans; and (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of devel,�pment proposed; and (d) The design of the- subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildtife or their habitat; and (e) -he tentative t "ct is not likely to cause serious public nth problems,; and (f) The design: of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by t,.e public at large, rmw of record. for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. been reviewed and considered in coompiian a with Cali ornia the Environimenthas l Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. S. Based 1, 2 cnd 3 above, this ��issioni hereby approves. the application sub3#ctato each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and irr'zorporated herein by this reference. Design Review I. The shape of fle windor, panes on Model 1500 shall be square in shape rather than rectaogular. 2. The round vent element shall be peoviJed with Tore finished detains, such as louvers or surrounding trim, on all deviations. 3. ?ine round vent on the rear elevation of Model 1000A shall be increased in size. D 4. The square window on the shall front elevation of Model 10009, Type 1, three other elevations. changed in shape to be more compatible with window shapes on the i 5, The fdllowing roof the colors shall be omitted; "Life style Mission" (14132) and "Life style Padre Brown" (#110). ExH1a1T "r." i RESOLUTION W 83 -777 TENTATIVE TRACT 1, 8 - RCOINE September 14, 1988 Page 3 6. Tree Removal Permit No. 88 -16 is approved subject to replacement planting retained salt wth protected in acor accordance wi h Municipal XCode�Sect on 19.08.110. Tentative Tract Mac I. Provide a drainage acceptance letter authorizing public areas to drain onto private land, 8. Overhead Utilities: a. Sapphire Street r An in -lift fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the opposite (east) side of Sapphire Street shall be paid to the City prior to approval 0, the Final Map. The fee shall be one -half the City adopted unit a+w int times the length from the center of Almond Street to the south tract boundary. b. Almond Street - The existing overhead utilities on the project side of Almond Street shall be undergrounded from the first pale an the east side of Sapphire Street to the first pole west of the centerline of the Los Angeles Bureau of Power and Light Easement prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. For the portion with.n the utility easement (electrical and telecommunication) the developer MAY request a reimbursement agreement to receive one -half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. For the portion adjacent to the tract, an in -lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounaing of the utilities on the opposite (north side of almond Street (electrical) 111411 be paid to the City prior to Final !Neap approval. The fee sh-11 be one -half the difference between the undergroun4ing cost of the utilities (electrical) on the apposite side of the street minus those (telecomeewnications) on the project side times the length from the center of Sapphire Street to the first pole containing both electrical and telecommunication lines west Of the west tract boundary. 3. The southerly one half (26 foot of pavemaent street miprov+s nts along Almond Street shall be extended from the tract westerly to the centerline of the Los Angeles Bureau of Power and Light Easement. 4. All street shall have a centerline crown section. Street tilt sections are not permitted. The dedication for the-n-_ Orth half (33 feet) of Almond Street from Skyline Road to the east side of Sapphire Street shall be obtained i± accordance with Condition 6 to follow. �31 C• RESMUTION N4. -,.!n TENTATIVE TRACT 13738 - R001W S*ptft*r 14, 1988 Fade 4 F The developer shall make a g�,sd faith offart to acgufra the required off-site prop�trty interest necessary tc constrllot the! rtguirec, *tf. site improvements. If the developer should fail to do sal the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to Submittal of tha final XOP for apprigval, enter LUO an a9romont with the City to coftlttt thre i�rraveerants p+arsuan� to internest T required Sd tar he i at Such tire* aas the City acggires the property interests required far f llprav "eats. Such agrtwetnt shall PA. "Wt by developer of all casts in cohnectiarr with thee. subdivision. Security for these costs shall be in the foray of a cash That portion i of the shall' the am the value Of' the rtquiry off =titer property interest shalt b8 the araasarnt I *n in an appraisal report obtained by devrrlayp$r`, a: d #�ralo,�er s costa appraiser shall haivrk#sr appraysd by the City prior to cdr*enca"At of t*5e apprartal. 7. requir ants still be provided acc"; Amond Street to turquoise pine Districts � Street. S. A si'doa+altt shalt be p stratet. rovid#d on on* si+,te only of the intarior 9. Thee AlNOM Interrmpt flksttr Plan Chanr}el (line 1A-) shall be Constructed from the existing; portion to the stwther#st extending tsi a riartherly projeu:ticn of the east sides of Sapphirrt th"st or as otherwise necessary to provide dratina prot#cticft far the 'Tract as approved by they City Engfnxer. The cost cf constructing rei urs the facility is eligible for taurnts in arcoa�dance Nfw W.ty tSrdinarrce W. 75. Ill. ATWO"d gtrftt Shaul be Mstructed full width #rtr>ar Henry Street to of pray n s f ths' no el tares t future level for the cost north side of the street. op" on the 6. The Selr:retary to this of this Ritsola,tion.. CoedaiWon Shall artify to the adoption AM AMED THIS 24TH DAY Df SUTgolk, 1908. PLANNING COWSSION QF THE CITY Cm` REIMRSDIEMTS IN CUCMVIZA BY: " airy at MR" _~ 4a I ---------- W- I —, r jumatroe Is >`v RESOLUTIO NO. 88 -177 TENTATIVE TRACT 13738 - MINE September 14, 1988 Page 5 _ I, Brad Buller„ Secretary of the Planning Cozaission: of the City of Reimbursements ;n Cucamonga, do heresy Certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, pressed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Reimlaursements in Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Omission held on the 14th daffy of September, 1988, by'_ he following vote -to -wit: RYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKEiv2 -, EMERICki,�ChITMA, MC NIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: C"ISSIONERS: NONE c ABSENT! C"ISSIONERS: NONE i�- 73 tosnpxaies, ina. 3ept•absr 23, 1988 City Clerk City at atanchc Curt,: wawa Post 0MC4 Sox Ili 7 Raache Cucamaaga, California 91730 CO: Tantati+rs Tract Map 13731 Dear City Clerk. Rodin Caspaniss, sad, bas received notice that the �'��untnq ComaLssion has approved Tentative. Tract Y3 ?SS, stt e+�t, to conditions I through la ,of planaiag CGffr4XsLOA R4ISOIUtioV 84-177. We are cOncarsaed with Casd!itiexs 3, ; s, 9, 7, 9 Irsasd 10 Accordinglr, we ssspectlully appeal from t" dfcisioa as the an Ple3nV Camsissi64 With VOWIrd to these conditions. Sincerely, Rodin* Cdapanies, rac, by. an e� F General Cou nsel 147 east obt shed • monrov #a, ca 91015.818.303.7771 • fax 818.358.8328 11 ,WaArdy ar LAA riar Ovewz#a uT�ur�et 4 rlKrArWW 'ro&CT Ail 157541 tl UX"Iv E - MiAr lieu ltAt �' - �`rsreo�rv�vcaz+wrr,� s C",- OF RANCHO CUCAMONGIA RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE atANN1NG RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING LNDERGROUNDING OF EXISTING REPEALING RESOLUTION No. 86 -77 NO. 87 -96 COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF A REuISED POLICY FOR THE OVERHEAD UTILITILS AND WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga wishes to repeal Resolution No. 86 -77 which was adopted on the 28th day of May, 1986 and establish the revised Policy contained herein; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of kancho Cucamonga wishes to remove unsightly existing overhead utility lines in order to promote a more lesthetic and desirable working and living environment within the City; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to establish a policy to inform propqrty owners and developers of the City goal. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved and established that all developaeants, except those contained in Section a and any others specifically waived by the PI'Aning COMmission, shalt be responsible for undergrr,,,1ng all existing overhead utility lines including the removal of the rela.td supporting poles adjacent to and within the limit" of a development is follows: 1. Lines ^ the _2E Wect side of the street *: a. Said lines shall bs undergrounded at the developer,% expense. b. In those circumstances where the Planning Commission decides that undergrounding is irractical dt present for such reasons as a short length of undtrgrounding (less thin 300 feet and not undergrounded adjacent), a heavy concentration of services to other users, disruption to existing improvements, etc., the Ocveloper shall pay an in -lieu fee for the full amount per Section 6. c. The ikvaloper Shah be eligible for rein0hursement of one -half the cost of undergrounding from future developments as they occur on the opposite side of the street. 2. Lines an the OR2&itesido of the street from the a ect: The Developer snal I pay a et o a y or one-half amount per Section 6. 3. Lines on both sides of the street: The Developer shall comply with ee on a -z' - and be 21191010 or reimburTMAnt or pay additional fees so that he bears a total expense equivalent t4 one -half the total cost of undergrounding the lines on bath sides lf %he street. 4. Pole lines Containina i &y or 14r 2!r electrical tines: All lines Shall be un ergrouo d or In-fieu feess paid n accor- anCe w . section 1, 2 or 3, above. except for 66 KV irr larger electrical lines. s . Ll a5. Limits of Responsibilities: A. In•lieu_ fees shall be based upon the length of the property being developed from property line to property line (the center of adjacont streets for corner properties). b. Undergrounding ,shall include the entire project 7rontage and - extend to: (1) the first existing poles off -$I' e from the kroject boundaries (across the street for corner properties), (2) a new kale: erected at a project bounda -� (acs,oss the streeA for cornets properties), or (3) an existing pole W thin 5 feet of a project boundary, except at a corner. 6. Fee Amount: The amount: for %o lieu fees shall equal the length (per ec on .a ) times the unit amount as established by the City Council based upon information supplied by the utility compaies and as updated periodically as defamed necessary. 7. EEx�xemmp�t__i__o__n_s The following Types of projects shall eke exempt from this pow a. The addition of functional equipment to existing developments, such as: loading docks, silos, satellite dishes, antennas, water tanks, air conditioners, cooling towers, onciosur+t of an outdoor storage area, parking and loailing areas, block walls and fences, etc. b. Building additions or new free standing buildings of less than 25% of the floor area of the existing tilging(s) on the sank assessor's parcel, or 5,000 s4uare feat, whichevzle� is less. c. Exterior upgrading or repair of existing developments, such as: reroofing, addition of trellis, awnings, landscaping, equipment screening, repainting and exterior finishes, etc. d. Interior tenant improvements and non - construction CUPS. e, The construction of a single family residence on an existing parcel. f'. Existing overhead utility lines located in trails, alleys., and utility easements with a Navy conceatrotiin of services to adjacent dayslopments, and the utility l.;Nxs are 500' or owe from the Moil; of way line of a Special Boulevard. g. Residential subdivisions of four or fewer single family residential parcels, where the utility lines extend at least 600' offsite from both the project boundaries and the adjacent property is not likely to cantributa to future undergrounding. et All references to streets s',dll also mean alleys, railroad or channel rights -of -way, etc. am I a pr-" APPROVED ANA APWTEQ YRli 10th CAY OF JUNE 1967. PLAMMI"rs C/O - ISSICK Of THE MY CO RMCHO CUCf1-�iG11 �/ n -x. ,, A I, Brad Butler, O"UtY Secretary of the Planning CCW"ion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regOarly introduced, passed,, and adopted blr, the PI*King Cami #lion of th#A City of Rancho CucaeAga,.at i, regular mstind-.pf the ;,planning C�meissioan ttaId on the 10 day of June, 1907, by the following xate.to -V1t: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: EMOICX9 CHITIPA, =XEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOi ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: mokt ABSTAiM: CW- 41SSIONFAS: 8L'1KESUY a fF7 Z WL LLJ t• 1 r Jx i C�1 pl� Z 1 Sn 1 t i 1 ' 1 1 I Wig i i -� cr e public hearing was closed. Mot Moved by Emerick, seconded by 9lakesley, to adopt the Resoluti appro g Environmental Assessmnt and Conditional Use Permit 88 34. Rio on carried the following vote, AYES: ISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL, TO QY NOES: CVMM NONE ASSENT: COW -carri I K. MODIFICATION TO CONDIT S OF APPROVAL FOR Q _K E4. tdAP 9847 - WESTERN. - A request y on t, s o Approval requiring a �c an sand within Terra sta Parkway fo a subdivision of 17,.48 acres of land into 3 parcels in t Serra Vi Planned Cammunity, located on the southeast corns:^ of Lhurc = Stree and Terra. Vista Parkway - APN: 1077- 421 -06, 1077- 091 -17. Joe Stoffa, Associate Cirtil Engineer se rd the staff report. Chairma., McNiel opened the public aring. Ken Nishihawa, Lewis Home, I ted this deletion feared to the Sam median strip as was deleted on the evious application bec se there_ was no room for landscaping. There being no further convents, the public hearing was cl ed. Motion: moved TolstoyI seconded by Chitiea to adopt the Res4:ution approving the dification to Conditions of Approval for Par I Mp 9897. Motion carrie y the following vot4: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, EAERICK, t+K;HIEL, TOL Y ±IDES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE NT COMMISSIONERS: - carried L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSPIENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13731 - ROOINE COMPANIES, res en a sub vision of singe famIlY tots an iz.un acres ai' —iand in the Very Low Residential District (1 -2 dwelling units per acre), located wort of Sapphire, south of Almond - APN: 1061- 091 -0.1" Associated with the project is Tree Removal Penoit 88 -16. Beverly Nissen, Assistant Pllnner presented the staff report. Flannl..*I�g Commission Minutes -12- September 14, 1988 Alk NP Coamissiorer Chities asked for clarification on which three color samples were to be used. Ms. Nissen indicated the colors. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Dorothy Haight, Project Coordinator for Rodine Company, stated they agreed to the conditions. Mike Hames, 5248 Carol; Rancho Cucamonga exprassed concerns about the drainage, asking that drainage be provided before the start of construction. He also requested rodent control before grading as the area had two coyote dens and many rodents. Jack Cygan, 8160 la Senda, Rar--ho Cucamonga, stated he was concerned with drainage and grading and he a1i7 wanted protection for the wildlife such as coyotes and roadrunners. Jim Smith, 5208 Saphire Street, Rancho Cucamonga, wanted assuran%;e regarding maintenance of the windrow.- Chairman McNiel stated the drainage seemed to be a major concern and there were concerns over rodent control and. wildlife preservation. He asked the applicant what they planned to do about the wildl,tfe. Ms. Haight stated they would take appropriate measures to control the rodents and would perhaps gather the larger wildlife and move they to the mountains . Chairman McNiel suggested they might contact the Humane Society regarding the coyotes, and exterminate the Sphers and rats. Ms. Haight stated they had created drainage to go down to Saphire. Farrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer, stated the ditch along the south property line would take drainage to Saphire. As the developer was being required to peat it an Intercept Channel from Almond, there should be 'less water going to Saphire. He also indicated the 6 8 foot trench behind the trail would have a chain link fence besidti it. Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, indicated the intercept Channel would protect the surrounding property owners. Mr. Cygan asked if he had to do any fencing in order to have access to the new bridle trail. Commissioner Chitiea stated the developer was putting in rail fencing on the north side_ only. Aft Mr. Coleman stated the City could not prevent private property owners from putting up a fence on their own property and the trail would belong to the new property owners. However, they could not block the trail at its end. Planning Com+nissi-in Minutes -13- September 14, 1968 As there were no further comments the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Chitiea stated she appreciated working with the applicant daring Design Review as they were responsive to concerns regardin3 wall design and architecteral elements. They planned good -sized lots and were sensitive to the views of neighbors. Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by Blakesley to adopt the Resolution to approve Environ.rental Assessment and Tentative Tract 13738. .Motion carried by the following vote., AYES: COMMISSIONERS: nRWESI.EY, CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEC, TO4STOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: - carried i i YArATION OF SAN DIEGO AVENUE - From Foothill Boulevard to norZof" ernar no oao - arce p 0238. Bill Si a, Deputy City Engineer - °pointed out that this matter brought b are the Planning Commission- before going to City ouncii', as required by California Government Code. Watt Stickney, As ciate Civil Engineer, presented the st report.. Jim Cline, Cucamonga unty Water District stated as therm to answer any questions. Ed Combs, 4345 North Centr Avenue, Upland asked what a 30 foot easement meant. Mr. Silva stated that the Footh i oulevard Specific Plan provides for internal ingress and egress and sP ied that small lots should use common ingress and egress, Richard Chado, 8874'Foothill ancho Cucamon , stated he owned two parcels in the vicinity. He stated wanted egress of oothil -.then he developed the parcel at the corner of n Diego and Foothill. Planning Departmert made him change the e San Diego. Now San Dieg was being taken away. As he plans to put in shopping center, he did not want an Diego taken away. Wally Schultz 513-Red Hill, Rancho Cucamonga, stated h owned the property between Mr. hado and Mr. Combs and was concerned about stricted access along San sego and wanted to know where the access easement w Id be made. Chai n icNiel asked if a tentative plan had been made. Silva responded one had not been done as ,yet, Planning Commission Minutes -14- September 14, 1988 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -177 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CIISSION OF THE CITY OF RANC1,'i CUCA40NGA APPROVI a TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13738,. AND DE,"ZIGN REVIEW THEREOF, !- OCATED SUUTN OF ALMOND AND WEST OF SAPPHIRE IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (LESS Tiik� 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE). APN: 1061- 091 -03 A. Recitals. (i) Rodine Companies Inc. has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 13738 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On the 14th of September, 1988, the fianning, Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing an the application and concluded said hearing an that date. (iii) All legs] prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. OR NOW, irtEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Conaission or' the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically ftlds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presr:nwzd to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on September id, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together aitl public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located on the west Side of Sapphire Street, south of Almond Avenue willn a street frontage of 580 feet along Sapphire Street and 455 feet along Almond Avenue and is presently vacant; and (b) The property to the north o' the subject site is vacant and designated for hillside Residential, the pr,.perty to the south of that site consists of single family Nesidential in the Very Low Residential Oistrict, the property to the east is single family residential in the Very Low Residential Diairlct, and the property to the west is vacant and designated as Los Angeles Bureau of Power and Light -- easement. 3. Based mote the substantial evidence presented to this Comission during the above -refer *aced public hearing and upon the specific findinpr, of facts set forth in paragraph I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: �) -!�)'5 RESOiUTION NO. 8F 7 TENTATIVE TRACT 1-,.jS POOINE September 14, 1988 Page 2 (a) That tentative tract is consisi;ent with the General Plan, Development Coda, and specific plans; and (b) The dosign or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General 'Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (c) The site is Physically suitable far the type of development proposed; and (d) The design of ':me subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage. and, avoidable injury to humans and wildlife: or their habitat; and (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; w7a (f) 'the design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of rscord1, for access through or use of the properly within the proposed subdivision. 4. This Caumission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in Coal iance with the California Environmental Qualit; Pct of 1970 and, further, this Comission hereby issues a Veg"ive Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the applications subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Design Review 1. The shape of the window pangs on Model 1500 shall be square in shape rather than rectangular. 2. The round vent element shall be provided with more finished details, such as louvers or surrounding tries, on all deviations. 3. The round vent on the rear elevation of Model 1000A shalt be increased in size. 4. The square window on the front elevation of Model 10008, Type 1, shall be changed in shape to be more compatible with window shapes on the three other elevations. S. Tne following roof tile colors shall be omittedc "Life style Mission" 0132) and "Life style padre 9rown" ( #110). I7 -`� L-1 RESOLUTION NO. 8E 7 TENTATIVE TRACT 13138 - 'RODINE Se-tember 14, 1988 Pa; 3 6. Tree Removal hermit No. 88 - "6 is approved subject to replacement planting in accordance with Municipal Coen Section 19.o8.1oo. existing trees to be retained shall be protected in accordance with Municipal Code Section 19.08.14- Tentative Tract Mao 1. Provide a drainage acceptance letter authorizing E:jblic areas to drain onto private land. 2. Overhead Utilities: a. Sapphire Street An in -lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the opposite (east) side of Sapphire Street shall be paid to the City prior to approval of the Final Mep. Ths fee shalt be one -half the City adopted unfit amount times the length from the center of Almond Street to the south tract bounder;. b. Almond Street The existing overhead utilities on ;he project side of Almond Street shall be undergrounded from the first polti on the east side of Sapphire Street to the first pole west of the centerline of the Los Angeles Bureau of Power and Light Easement prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. For the portion within the utility easement (electrical and telU0MK71icati0n) the developer may request a reimbursement agreement to receive one -half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. For the portion adjacent to the tract, an in -lieu fee as Contribution to the future undergrounding of the utilities on the opposite (north side of almond Street (electrical) shall be paid to the City prior to Fin-1, Map. approval. The fee shall be one -half the difference L -en the undergrovnding cost of the utilities (electricaz the opposite side of the street minus th (telecoaanunications) on the project side times the length from the center of Sapphire Street to the first pnle containing both electrical and telecoamiunication lines west of the west tract boundary. 3. The southerly one half (26 foot of ravement) street improvements along Almond Street shall be extended from the tract westerly to the centerline of the Los Angeles Bureau of PoacP�* and Light Easement. 4. All street shall have a centerline crotm section. Street tilt sections are not permittrd. S. The dedication for the north half (33 feet) of Almond Street from Skyline Road to the east side of Sapphire Street shall be obtained in accordance with Condition 6 to follow. RESOLD' i0N No. 177 TENTAI,iVE TP.ACT 1348 - RODINE September 14 1988 Page 4 6. The developer shall mai; a good faith effort to acquire the required Off -sits property interest necessary to construct the required off - site improvements. If the developer snolild fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittul of the Final map for approval, enter into an agreement with the City to a mpitte the improvements pursuant to Government code Section 66462 at such time ,es the City acquires the property interests sbequir +d for the improvements Such agreailnent shall provide for payment by developer Of all costs in 0104nectlon with the subdivision. Security for these costs shall bii in the form of a each deposit. That portion of the security reflecting the value of the required off -site property interest shall be the, amount given in an appraisal report obtained by developer, at develop * .7 -`s cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal„ 7. An emergency access road per Foothill Fire District's requirements shall be provided along Almond Street to Turquoise Street. � S. A siaewalk shall be provided on One side only of the interior street. 9. The Almond 'atercekt Master Plan Channel (Hine 1A) shall be ay constructed fr the existing portion to the southwest extending to a northerly projection of the asst side of Sapphire Str *et or as otherwise necessary to provide drainage protection for the Tract as approved by the City Engineer. The cost of constructing the facility i2 eligible for reimbursements in accordance with City Ordinance No. 7S. 10. Almond Street shall be constructed full width 'from Htnr, Strcet to Sapphire Street. A reimbursement agreament may be regvasted for the cost of improvements r the north half of thQ street from future devel..opment on the north side of thw street. 6. The Secretary to this CoW4Ssion shall certify to the adoption of this Resolutfcl. APPROVED AND A0Q4'iED THIS 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMER, 1988. PLANNTHG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF REIKURdEtENTS Tk CUCAMONGA BY AT U��S 12 I RESOLUTION No. , 8E TEEMTAi'IY" TRACT MJ8 ROC!NE September 14, 1988 Page S I Arad bullew Secretary of the Planning Comm�siork of the City of Reimbur :ements in Cucamonga, do hereby certify that'-the for+eg.aing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, pased, and adopter by the Planning Commission of *he .ity of Rclmburseftnts in Cucamonga.'at a regular meeting of the Planning Comet ,.ion held on the 14th day of Septe*sr, 1988, by the j frrti ft-Ing vote -to -wit. AYES: COMfiIISSIOREM. BLAKS—MEY, EkMRICK, CHITIEA, MC NI =L„ TOLSTOY NOES: CCWISSIONEIRS: NONE ABSENT: COMISSIONWAS: NONE f� F i N u` h a Odu1nal Poor Q�jaft sg sVIgas if��wO�Y i y I s Y UI `inc, ^JLySIS E \ 's. s y •a s t H Is � i N u` h a Odu1nal Poor Q�jaft s �ryJ` -��� 1V '���� Y� � i y I s Y UI `inc, - 1 �m 7 E Mos. s �ryJ` -��� 1V '���� Y� ;ss is all • Y pq i "A � =s z \ °y -i � s pal- 11 i� � i y I s Y � 3 � y M y O 4� s ;ss is all • Y pq i "A � =s z \ °y -i � s pal- 11 i� Original Poor Quality ':-;Y ��a�_.z �a :�r�s sly 3 x-m Sl is lit. APO- 6 � k. k = a $; i still it _f Ir �— a r M i 3 » b Y it yY y��q w ��jj k all $s?' N !f i Y► Y PIT ��y{{ is _- So 'sit vs lz hip A 1 MIN Y i esitt. ,•A �l �t z- �» ..1 e�{ z^: Wk 1 f l M# xFBI «S« j x�� ANTI U itta, Y " a H IRS k-C » fit -,,14 \A _ 2 ilia V114 Y��sw ]all all s� g x HI 11a l3 3 v— fill vi ill �Y �y .Is- I ill d� W sir c Mme" s gp 1. %si ti— - ek� a E �`r�y 1 V a E Oriel A)or Quanty M 3 =3 sa= era i1r`o� •. g- �' i a [ q � A Y yt pp+ Y ffi ail ��� ys�.a ��4.d 'O � ♦��5� � �a 'Jill 1. I & Nei: : 1, I a II�eay sf ttYy Y 6Y 2J3yp V`Jx .0 4» 666 q� *y 1x! Ali Y 1� 6 i Pea' yS .! 4 133 s V _Jif ±rN UN NY7 �� W Qb .ya a� lr P I�g "A. U C. .+Vi -U NA >t V d fl J s Y V s.Jvif silt $' s� �RD M41 AIR 1i t ZA N °a r�11 s ate O i + • e r Eli e V i NV °� /+9w $w i V MY FY3a i � Q Y � « • a p• it *Q all ! I _= Is., s ate y + • e r Eli V i NV °� /+9w $w •R �1l V MY FY3a N 3 •V Y Y +gY w c al ft �Q i Y « 4 � Aft V ~ V •M. Y6� Y �Pw i m Y b b V r Y 14 4 ST A a all + 3 � s s �• �sw s; :s� "�` o 4 1.1 i5i ` ii 34- °_, _ Jill 4 s ZVI H 1 �� PI ^ • V, j p` 32 4r �,��� ss s soli 1.1 Asti » $s� Ills iw Y()fs� Vial _ yap � ��P.M _yam A J i j llY • iw " :g; x331 ij MN �g "°•'i ',l�SZ� �� NA� r .aa � ' o=l�gl�, �! � 'jg'��'S! vRRS.v rtl_1m N NY! s Y. �4 �� � y $'s $ y e 11 s �, YiO.qqN.bi i` y V V �� PI ^ • V, j p` 32 4r �,��� ss s soli 1.1 Asti » $s� Ills iw Y()fs� Vial _ yap � ��P.M _yam A J i j llY • iw " :g; x331 ij MN �g "°•'i ',l�SZ� �� NA� r .aa � ' o=l�gl�, �! � 'jg'��'S! vRRS.v rtl_1m N NY! s Y. �4 �� � y $'s $ y e 11 .117 Ord,Onal, Poor Quality a. � � L � 0 3 ` 9 •� � � y� g a■ L �t elf 'Ej C lit" Y b _ IQ • ^a : _ » =u. 3� • 4 a� r� c P q O gg p Ya yP L « ae " M L W i r I 6 H i tl its Ix $ Agr i 4 w-i3 V s 'Y Pf K Y O " a wit _ �x4 8r v v 312 $Z• $� Y n ■ 4r •_� ryi p ili Alu • . -:. gyp '$ . kH +1 5 w 3 g via CWT r ' s ay 01244. J Ilk Sri. ' �I— �n4G lei p�ypy s'E� Oq�qy� = = ` l i c ]+CA eX1f6 (C�t y` M W � w. " ` f � ii�t - 1 ♦ f[1 y GN «� a O j ggee. O'� ppp AM b J ae 3Y' 3 sr o q, r y� 8 • Y a rs t r e+ a� a s` wwr r a �a i Y Iry jyyiy` r is a_- M� x M $1 w m1� t . i i d Yg 3� d+ w.r. `S �Y w Y 9~ Y sus 7Y�! M f VA a s d r z s r d a w q� M M A H� MI s Y a g� a S a I 4 �v N s1L ,aj s I v�Y s «� a 2� ro .v« J c S « y V 21 sq o w rA a TI � M 11 i ary OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM ac r' r BATE. November 16,, 1988 1977 TU: City Council and City Kanager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Joe Stofa Jr., Associate Fivil Engineer SUBJECT: SUPPLEMENTAL 1NF6WAT1ON FOR THE APPEAL THE CONDITIONS OF 1 On 4ovevber 4, 1988, the attacbtd info tied packet; was received frost the Appellant. Out to its late arrival, stiff did not have sufficlont time to prepare a response for inclusion In the staff :part. T1% inforsation packet is being forwarded is the Council -to be considered as pant of the Appollant°s tes :irrony. It is noted #slat tm inforoWari 1 packet refers to several additional conditions which "re not listed in the original appeal letter. Respectfully subarittsvl, iTf{' RHM:JS ,.. Ty f Abtecbments: 2nforation Packet j� r f E li RECEIVED NOV 0 d 1588 � ? to BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL 0r . THE � CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG?' in re the Application ,r ) Tentative Tract 13738 RODINE COMPANIES, INC., ) APPEAL FROM DECISION OF PLANNING COWL -I SSION Applicant. Applicant, Rodine Companies, Inc. respectfully appeals from the the above tenta- decision of the Planning Commission to approve subject to certain conditions. Specifically, appli- tive tract, cant appeals from the imposition of conditions 2, 3, :, 6, 7, 9 and 10, and those Stand °.rd Conditions relating to thtr sane appeals from tr.ose Standard Conditions subjects. Applicant also which are not priper condiiion• of a subdivision map, or which have been the subject of a findivq by the Planning commission. A hereto a3 Exhibit A, copy of the notice of 41proval is attached the notices of appeal is attached hereto as Exhibit and a copy of s RY :,-T (�NDITIONS MID BASES 14'tiR APPEAL Condition 2 requires providing offsitet undergxoundi.ng of existing in -lieu fee for utilities along almond street, and paying an contribution of for future undergrounding of utilities along Sapphire Street. ; Applicant contends requiring undergrounding utilities along Sapphire street for this 7ro10ct Only v?elates California law. YA addition, applicant contends that is a "peripheral Almond Gtrert west of Sapphire not street" an defined ir, the Huticip3�1 Code, acid the re- quirement of undorgrcunding is ivYroper. Condition 3 requires the improving of Almond Street t :'or► Henry to the center of the DW? utility "easement". � Applicant coat&=$ that such improvements are not maces - sary for fires access purposes and that the land does act belong to applicant in any 4AS4. Condition S roq_ires the obtaining and dedication of 33 feet of portions of the north hail of Almond Street. Am Applicant; contends that such improvements ara not neces- . 1 nary fog Fire access puxpoaats and that the lard does not belong to applicuAt in any case Cond,ttion 6 deals with the process for acquiritsq the ^)roper - ty referred to in Condition 6 and deals with an aY /resmer to be entered into with the city regarding, int!dr alit, security for improve.tents. Applicant contends that such propertY should not be obtain ad, thaoref'ora such condition La moot. Condition 7 requires.an emergency access road along Almond street to Turquoise Street. Applicant contends that tk�a Frrthill Yire District has statad such access in not na®ded, and t%:asefora tLia condition should not km i,:aposoa. Condition 9 requires canstxu:tion of the Alr,,cnd intercept Master Plan Channel. Applicant contends such channel. is )°sajiccessary for mood protection (itj applicants's proposed subdivision. Condition 10 requires construction of Almond at gull width from Sapphire. Street to the proposed Henry Street. Applicanr c ont 4n a that such iynp::ovcamnnts are not ntces- sary for fire access pUXposas and the. the lwad does not belong to applicant in any case. Standard Conditions XG, Gti6 and N1 require the connection to the sewer system. Applicant contends that such requirement is probably an overflight, and is wzectasmry. These conditions are discuased bilow, n --t necessarily in order: URT)LZLS of BASES 07 APPM Basis far A�aoai of Condit,io+n 7 no Requ:LramenW by rccthil.l Fire Protection District -he Foothill Fi a Protection District has stated during � design review, and has again stated in a letter to applicant dated October 5, 1968, that the only access required along Almond Street is from Henry Street to Sapphire. Please refer to Exhibit G attached hereto and incorporated herein. Accordingly, the condition of approval to provide an fire access road along Almond Street from Hen :ny to Turquoise Streets is unnecessary and the use of the police powers of the City to require such improvements would be improper. The Foothill Fire Protection District has adapted Ordinance No. 10, which adopted the 1985 Uniform Fire Code, with certain changes. Among the changes adopted were to Section 10.207(,:) which changed the minimum width for a fire access road to twenty -six feet. Accordingly, the width of the paving required for fire access of Almond Street from Sap- phire Street to Henry Street is twenty -six feet, or one -half of the street width. This shoul& be the only-, requirement of paving along Almond Street. On the same basis as above, applicant also appeals from Standard Condition G1. General Plan Open spaca and Zquest4risn Zlemants ThF :..feral Plan states the intent of the City with respect tc the area of the proposed development: "In the northwestern portion of the City and the unit► - co;porated areas to the north, the intent is to preserve open space and to ensure that development can ac:a =rit date equestrian activities." General Plan, page 35 Pursuant to tnis intent, the General Plan has des,.gnated the area of the proposed development Very! Low Density, and has included proposed community trail: and regional trails in the Master Plan of Trails near or adjacent to the proposed development, The applicant has been sensitive to this intent, and has included in the site plan accesa t;, the community trails through a feeder trail system completely encircling the deciul-opment site. The existence of an improved street from t?enry street to Turquoise would be .inconsistent with the intent of the General plan, pc:ticularly with respect ::o the equestrian elements. As further evidence of this positions nether the Circulatioaa Flan nor the Transit Concept; Plan show Almond Street west Of Henry Street as an current element or as a proposed right-of-way location. Basis for Arv4al, of Condition 3 _ 3 3 E Condition 3 requires the improving of Almond Street from Henry Street to the ceAter of the DWP utility "ea3ement ". The initial problem with this condition is that this land is not owned by applicant. It is not an easement at all, but fee land owned by the City of Los Angeles. See Exhibit D attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. In addition, as discussed above, there -is no necessity of having this street improved for fire access purposes. Accordingly, this condition should be eliminated as unneces- sary, and the use of the police pdvers of the City to re- quire such improvements would be impV,oper. Basis for A_nEaa., of. �ondit3.an S Condition 5 requires the obtaining and improving of Almond Street from Henry Street to Sapphire Street. Ste initial problem with this condition is that this land is not owned by applicant. In a•,ditiote as discusse4 above, there is no nr,�lessity of raving this street improved for fire access purposes. Accordingly,'this condition should: be eliminated as unnecessary, and the use of the police powers of the City to re mire such improvements would be improper. Basis for AMeal of gc_zdsition jq Conaition 10 requires the improving of the full width of Almond Stre.:t from Henry Street to Sapphire Street. The initial problem with this condition is that this land ie not owned by applicant. in addition, as dsoussed ;hove, there is no necessity of having the north side of this street improved for fire adcess purposes, Accordingly, this condi - tiun s4ogld be eliminated as unnecessary, and the use of the police powers of the City to require such improvements would be On the same basis as above and to the extent applicable, applicant also alpeals from Standard Conditions K2, K5, L1, L2, L3, L7, and 7,10. Basis icr , •a' of Condition Sapphire Street Cndaxgroundinq In 1983, the legislature of California passed into law Czvernment Code section 65913.2, which states in part: "In exercising its authority to regul;.te subdivisions under Division 2 (commencing Ath Section 46410, a city, countti, or city and county shall: L1 ,1A 7 (c) Refrain from imposing standards and criteria for public improvements including, but not limited to, sewers, fire clations, schools, or parks, which exceed the standards -nd criteria be,ng applied :y the city, county, or city and county at that time to its publicly financed improvements located in similarly zoned dis tricts within that city, county, ax city and coun.ty." Sapphire Street: is'not contained within a current utility undergrounding projecti on the contrary, pursuant to Ci':y Council. Resolution 61 -175, the following is the priority list for undergrounding projects usiu% public funds pursuant to Public Utilities t•.ommissien Rule 20: Archibald Avenue Foothill Boulevard Haven Avenue Base Tine Road Carnelian St_eet Nineteehch street Although a search has been wade, applicant cannot find any new City Council resolution changing this priority list to include Sapphire Street. Since the existing priority list includes both r...,A*-m�ercially and res*.dentially zoned areas of the City, it appogors clear the mandate of Government Code Section 65913.2 should apply. This means that until Sapphire street is given priority for undergrounding and an actual undergrounding project is begun (including levying of assessments to all adjacent property owners), that it would be en improper use of the police power to require this atpplicart to provide for underground- ing of utilities, except within the actual subdivision. Almond Street undergrounding For the same reasons as above, applicant asserts that the requ4 ring of undergrounding of Almnnd Street is also not proper. In addition, applicant asserts the following as a basis for appeal from this condition. Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code therein2.fter referred to as "Cade "), Section 1.6.36.090 provides iz! part: "All utilities within the subdivi4ion and along periph- eral str®(LS shall be placed underground except those facilities exempted by the Public Utilities Commission regulations." [emphasis added} i E Srction 16.08.150 defines peripheral street as 'an existing street whose right -of -way is contiguous to the ekterior boundary of the subdivision." (emphasis added] section 1.09.010 dafin�za stre�rt as including -11 "streets . or other public ways in this city ;&Ich have been ar -ay hereafter be dedicated and open to public use ..." (emphasis added] Almond Street wsst of Sapphire Street is not an existing', dedicated street. -in order to osccommodate the Fire District requirements, the applicant krill offer to dedicate the northern portion of its property for a public street from Sapphire Street to the proposed Henry Street, and improve to half-street standards. However, since there is no dgedicatlon of almond Sara,.._ zest of Henry Street along eithaz ' :he north or south sidi, or along the north side west c! Sapphire Street, such land dogs not constitute a "street "c according to Code, It is clear "rat su,;h areas are not areas covered by the undergrounding ordinance, since they are not "streets ". Accordingly, it would be an improper use of the police powers of the City to require the undergrounding of utilities sa these areas. Even assuming that Almond Street were a dedicated stre.st, it would not be proper to require undergrounding, except where such existing street is &ctuaily contiguous to applicant's property, to be consistent Cede Sections 16.36.090 and 16.08.160. On the same basis as above and to tjie extent applicable, applicant also appeals from Standard Conditions NI and N.l. Basis for A226 sci of a'..ndxrd _wo;tditions A. G5 and N1 Although the impos�.tion of these conditions is possib:.y an oversight, these conditions are appealed f =om to the extent that a sanitary sewer hookup is required. The proposed development contains lots in excess of X0,'00 square feet and the use of septic tanks is authorized by Code. Basis for Anp al of, Condit!'On 9 Constructio, of the :almond Intercept Master plant Channel This condition requires the applicant to construct appzroxi -- ;aately 1,800 feet of concrete flood control channel on property not belonging to applicant. If built by applicant, 41 lit, 6 EN it would cost approximately $600s000, or $33,333 for each 0� the 18 homes for t-hich applicant is seeking approval. Th4$ channel is not necessary, and the requirement that this applicant build such an unnecessary channel would be an improper u-se of tice police powers of the City- Code Section 16.36-060 provides the basis for the general condition of a subdivisioil protecting downstream property, as follows: "storm-water runoff from the subdivision shall be tiol- lected and conveyed by an approved storm drain system. The storm drain system shall be designed for ultimate development of the watershtcd. The storm drain .system shall provide for the protection of abutting and oft- site properties that would be adversely affacted by any increase in runoff attributed to the development; off- site storm drain improvements may be requi=ed to satisfy this requirement." Lemphasis added] it is clear that this section, and common sense, relates to runoff from tl,* subdivision- Applicants drainage I' an for dealinca with the subdivision's runoff has not been disap- proved by the City Engineer. AML Immediately to the noith and upstream from applicant's proposed subdivision it Tract 10210, approved by the City in 1981. Among the conditions of approval of tract 10210 is precisely the same condition -- thkit the Almond Intercept Master Plan Cnannel be built. That condition is logical, and consistent with Code Section 16.36.060, in that it would protect downstream properties. it is a logical impossibili- ty that such a channel could be a proper requirement under Code section 16.36-060 for both upstream end downstream subdivisions. The only conclusion is that the channel is only necessary if an upstream subdivision is built -- and applicant's subdivision is downStcOam- The City Engineer may argue that the condition imposed relates to the protection of the proposed subdivision from upstream flood waters and is therefore necessary. However, the facts are contrary. Chapter 19.12 of the Code is entitled Flood Damage Preven-: tion, and as its title implies, deals with measures to prevent flood damage and injury. The definition of which lar63 within the City art "Arras of Special Flood Hazard" is found at Code Section 19.1i;.050, which adopts and into-porates the "Flood Insurance Study 0. �X -44 E the City of Rancho Cucamonga" which is prepared by the Federal Emergency Managemen Agency. Such study, along with the current Flood Insurance Rate Map, was adopted and ap- proved as the basis for determining flood hazards. The area of applicant'c proposed subdivis.,.on is shown on the Ficod Insurance Rate Map as being in Zone C, areas of m'ni- mal flooding. A portion of this map is attache: at Exhibit E and herein 5.,corporated by rzference. The Genera' plan discusses the f -ood hazards within the City. General Plan figure V -5 shows areas of the 100 -year flood hazard for both a one foot and two foot depth. The area of applicant's proposed subdivision is not within any flood hazard area, according to the General Plan. Additionally, in the Negative gecianation, the City Planner and Planning Commission have admitted that the channel is not necessary, by their determination that the project will have no significant impact on the environment, even without any mitigation measures, and no mitigation measures are OWfisted. Accordingly, since tnere is no hazard from floods flowiaq onto the proposed subdivision, and no hazard from the subdi- vision to downstream proptrty, then is not ,iecessary to require this applicant to bui.Ld the channel. on the same basis as above and to the extent, applicahle, applicant also appeals from Standard Conditions M5 and ws ". Coastitutiorasi Ground for meal In addition to all the above bases for. appeal, the condi- tions should not be imposed, since they are in violation of the constitutioaal right, of applicant. The estimated cost of undergroundir utilities, `+uilding a mile -long access road, installing A sewer, a^_quiring land f,: )m an adjacent landowner, and .auilding a storm drain, across lands not owned by the applicant is in excess of one and one -half million dollars. This is not hil.si,`e proper- ty, but relatively flat land, which was previously occupied by a single family residence and a small orchard. Tf appli- cant builds these improvements, then the price of each of the is Domes will increase by eve.,, $83,000 each. These homes would compare to similar ones in the neighbori.00d worth $200,000 to $225,000, but the prices would have to bye in- creased by this $83,000, which is a 31T. to 41% iAcretose. (,' )usly, at these prices, such homes would be uimarkeia ble. Effectively, applicant is being unctnst itutior ally denied the ecotomicaily *viable use of its property, Ste Kevstane Hit�mi g{ Coal o is i n. X. Dee nedi:ct�t U.S. r 7.07 S. Ct. 1232. t- r+d7}j, rst Yffv e1 cal Lutheran Cho 31 Glendale v. i nt. 2f, rzas Anae1--S-,- (19871 U.S. r 107; S. Ct. 2378. Respectfully submittedt Rodine Companies, Inc. Applicant Navember 2, 1488 �y �. Alla:i P. Dcnne1 T,- &-uQ.` 1 General Counsel. I A i I I �. _ '11 -1A / 0701- 0 2 ol2 -14-88 PC Aqenda o 3 of 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMORGA Ask NOTICE OF DETERMINATION TO: County Clerk FROM: City of Rancho Cucamonga County of San Bernardino Planning Division 385 N. Arrowhead, Sth Floor P.0 Box 807 San Bernardino, CA 92415 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 SUBJECT: Filing of Notice oa Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources CoCa. PROJECT TITLE: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 1373$-- RODTH'ECOMPAMS, INC. STATE CLEARINGHOM NUMBER: NIX PROJECT LOCATION: West of Sapphire, south of Almond - APR: 1061- 041 -03 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A residential: subdivision of 18 single family lots on 12.33 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District i1-2 dwelling units per acre ?. Associated Kith ;fie Project is Tree Removal Permit 8816. This is to advise that the 01ty of Rancho Conga has eppr+oved the above described project's 1. The project _will, x will not, have a significant effect on the ne envirmnt. 2. An Enviroizmental Impact. Report was prepared bU- t.�`z project pursuant to the provisions of CEpA. X A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant —" to the provisions of CMA. The EIR or Negative Declaration and record of project approval may be examined at: City of Rancho Crsnga, 9320 Base tine Road, Rancho Cucamonga, W ifornia. 3. Litigation measures were, x were not, made a conditiEmj of the approval of the p' meet. 4. A statement of overriding considerations was, x was not, adopted for this project. Date: Septwber 14, 1988 Brad Buller Ci ty Planner -- title A -LA -I CITY OF RAhC H6 CL�le'tOHGA NEGATIVE OECLARATIdN ' J r 1. Brief Oescriotion of Prol�t0 acres ENY fR()NMTAL .ASLEMMENT AMD TEtii.Aii4' _ TRAC r 13 , - ROOM- 0 s n ��AHZ ac �qn su rs S o;' s n � 2 duelling units per a (1 1061- 091 -03. nfi Tand in the Vertu Lctrt Aesia+entisl D1xtr,, 16• west op is iPrne acr'I located ReasavallPeneit Associated with the Project j 2, name and Address of AP!alicant:, Iodine Caapanies. Inc. `,41 E, 011Va Street c n via. Ck 91016 wrAr tt1 0ality Act of Pursuant ter the provisions mind th above igor ent 3 has date l 3. aiu<� Cuca conga 1970, the Ci'Ey Kill not haVP. a significant effect upon the environment- not be reituired. Impact Report will re grad by the City of decision and the{,Ini i1 isiaa of the City of 4, Fiinutes of Such Rancho Cucamonga art on file 1n Rancho Cucamonga. of Rancho J the City Council of the City may 6e aRpeeAidand must be received by the I 5, This decision filing fee Cucamonga. A written app ten (101 r�lendar days from the ti`F'n S:00 Planning Division no later si0n. date of the Planning COMission of mitigating Pl ntstion 1'ni3 Negative Declarati0 , an t0 +e attachments- 6. (if Any) as listed measures uATED 14 19NS ry e Alanniri fission Chairnair e ri- i oofhill Fire L. � TI—OTEC Jl r� ICJ' DISTRICT f P. 0. BOX 35 . "23 AMETHYST ST. • RANCHO CUCAMONGA 91701 I 17141 987.2S3$ October 5, 1"a Ms. Dorothy G. Haight. Protect Door&,alor Rodine Companies, lncwporated 147 East Olive Stree: Monrovia, CA 91098 RE: TRACT 13739 Dear Ms. Haight: As dism,'Wd in our meeting this date, the axess. shown on 0- (copy enclosed) for the abovenoted tract will be aceeptable. The plans show tsro separate and distin t points of iagreWiSoess to. as payed pn�lic street {�+�phire Street". One aoceac point is 86" V4ta t, S*Whire. The second point, Henry Street north to Almond, then ease to SappolifO, wait be AWSptable if Almond Street from Henry Street to Sap.9mrs is paved, It you have any questions. plea:5e do not hesitate to contact Me. Sincerety, Vera A. Arthur Fire Prevention imepestor Enclosure - f (,1A a 1°.�1TltR� e` :•i0 is . AML •" WY. TOE IM AT' �WU AND NM sm kos a�, • �. �1t AAl 4" a raaiaa. r fiAsE �srea3z; Pisa #9806ft 420wihd affil • ' ]i of Boa 1. so all aosM�a�,4ra .. ai�taata l.3i ab '+C6"Pr a � dwso : ie iibs 09 me . ,ar 1s ok in " 9 �e Gan an N" . l'+ &.•. ei Qsjllrial Of #:IAA �i AWL AFRO" M Mum IL NEW. r "on. aK 'Moinat, Poor Quaft pyct ptr engird Aahkod W ANWW p4t"Ssms AT Imp .Y1YC 9'wlC. �'.St ed t{e�e is - i1�lo �e �M► �! 8 Y TWi13A �e � as fW�t e! a+� �ias� a� If�e iel later _.{ I" AWL" it '�p I1 I ,V (mot, **,,,+ 0- .m'", - KEY TO MAP ? ;Q0.Year Hood Boundary• Io0•year Fleod Boundary - ' :cne Des1pidcros* " ?• y i00•Year Flood Boundary -- ZONE a if •.i in0•YearFr;AdOo:Induy °- -.. «� iasc Flood ElevadonLive — yf3...........,,. With Elevation In Feats- 34c Florid Elevation In Feet ieL YB�1 Ni,crc Uniform Within Uric" ;ic,attun Rcf¢ren:e Mark. c Zone I) Boundary - ---'•" River Mite +iJ11,5 - Referenced to the National Geodetic Vtttickt Oatum of 1929 *EXPLANATION OF ZONE DESIGNATIONS ZONE S^tPLANATION A AF139 of 100•yeu flood; bate flood eiovations and !food t.UU4 tatters not determined. AO Areas of 100+y1ar shallow ttoedin# where depths are between one (1) and three (3) test; averagtdepths of Inundadon am shown. but no f1ooJ hazard fact- are detormined. AM Areas of :00•ytar sltattnw floc) :4% where t1upths ari between. one (1) and :Cfet (d) I"t; ba1t tlnnd elevadons art shown, but nu loud haiarJ t +• I are determined. S1•A;iO of 100uctorsflood; base zfood elcva:.cs r...; flreas AN Areas of 100•ve4r 115110 to I..• t+•di`.:.:d .,. ...•. .r va:li .ri st 4,10 eua ..• • . • elevations anu fluuu hand ..J[ At l� • %" ••• 8 Areas between linen ul the 100", c4; *U' ;J :' � :. u''• year flood. or certain areas subject to IOU -year (tutu- k Ingwith average depths less In,n une (I) Wolof ..t.veu tlst wiributing drarhaµe area ib less Ilia" ant $61"" mile• ae areas proNCted by levees from the bese (11101. (Medium shading) r' c� AIM Of minimal flooding. (No mating) O Areas of undetermined, but possihte, rloou hat.rd:. a Y Areas of I00•Y4a ccabtat Hood with veloaty tw" action), butt flood 619yaitans aria 110011 "ll" ["lots tt nut determined. 71•V30 AMU of 100-year coastal (loan with velocity (wave action), base flood eievations and flood haaud tact4ts detarmeted. Cltiln areas nut In the stmidl it 31411 ,'a•d ..r -.• f "_ ut be vfntccttd b1 nano edI(ftf..dn., tt •1 Zt1NE A Ins non is for flood insulancc CHANNEL tN C s:HAkN£L , salt sunw Al areas suhtml to nun u e ... 0 q- � a "melt;; tenures aultltlt cotta' l , � a�. t, + s ;.n `, adimmnA map 1131114%. •.ee ,rfn,..l::. • ^fr,r +ae I Ell E. aIV19 CITY�OF RAETHO Cs rt� 4 x t.J {'X :V:14 DEC 0 1988 Y�$I�t�lu��t��213�4sI& �,�g, DEC 12'N A December 4, "T� 9810a011212I V48A{�jtf Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission 4340 Baseline Rd. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730 Re: Planning Commission meeting, December 14, 1988 Agenda item - "AN APPEAL OF THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13738 - RODINB COMPAN'll By way of identification, I own land adjacent to and immediately to the north of this proposed tra ^.t. After reading the Planning Department's staff report, I attended the Commission meeting on Seftember 14, 1988. The applicant produced no new surprises and venmed to agree with the condition. I agreed with the staff report and conditions. I did not object to the project. I still do not object to the project. In fact, I as in' `favor fit it. It represents a partial solution to a serious problem we have on Almond Street , west of Sapphire. 1 am sure all of you are aware of these problem=, The City Council, I believe, used good judgement In refering the appeal request back to Planning to work out the problems, This is where it should happen. In regard to the conditions being appealed: CONDITION #2 - a & b - There is a Plannning Commission resolution #87 -96, adopted June 10, 1987, which clearly specifies undergrounding utilities and how it shall be done. This is as it should be, since All new development for years has embraced undergrounding all utilities. From a practical standpW to however, the east side of Sapphire is not likely to be changed _n the foreseeable future and if it is changed, the developer, at that time, should bear the cost of undergrounding those utilities, CONDITION #5 - It is very important that Almond Street be paved, west of Sapphire, due to increased vehicular traffic associated with this development and to help solve some of the serious existing problem with trespassing, cff -road vehicles, motorcycles, and canyon traffic that we have today. Also, the neighbors to the east, eat enough dust to start a garden. Obtaining the dedication for the north dial# (33 feet) of Almond Street is necessary for this. CONDITION 46 - This condition involves obtaining part of my property. I have expressed, to the applicant's representative, a willingness to cooperate with them if they make a realistic offer for the property. To date, they ha- ^e mate no offer. CONDITION #7 - The emsrgeucy access road along Almond to Turquoise is to be graded and compacted tas per Engineering Department). This road is solid rock. It can't be compacted further. 3t does, however, need grading. The ouly real way to improve this road is to p.ve it and that is impractical at this point in time- CONDITION 99 - The Almond Intercept Channel is an example of overkill. It is the result of the U.S. Corps of Engineers using an out of date study of rua-off waters. Development since that study has changed the entire picture. The construction Of some method of handling run -riff water from proposed tract *14210, to the north, is necessary, but to construct the Intercept Channel frog it's easterly end to .he northerly projection of the east side of Sapphire is, in my opinion, unfair to this applicant. CONDITION Aq_o - Thin condition is a necessary part ox the development of the area and since part of the cost would be recoverable when tract #10210 is developed, I don't agree with the applicant's objection. I am in favor of the development of this tract. It will enhance the area, no doubt. It will also help solve some of our problems. But, most of the conditions are necessary and should not be compromised. Staff his done a very good job on this matter and I feral they should be listened to. Sincerely, r % y .r Charles E. Morgan 8234 Almond Street Alta Loma, Ca. 31701 987-1311 i �r 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 14, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, 5enier Civil Engineer BY: Joe Stofa.Jr., Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL CHANCQ 1WWWUKAILU - A 5koulvisiura Ur &.1r. Q% 2- part — els n the' de ium Density Residential Distr• units per acro), located on the east side of approximately 150 feet south of Lemon Avenue (APR %wa 934 - L. A. i�and into 1-14 dwelling ibaid Avenue 1 I. PROJEO,T ANC SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Re ci mtedz Approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map as - snown on exniui "B" S. Parcel Size: Parcel 1 - 0.51 Acres Parcel 2 - 2.21 Acres C. Existing Zoning: Residential (8 -14 Dwelling Units /Acre) D. Surrounding Land Use: Avrth - Rasidential South Yacant East - Vacant West - 4Residential E. Surrounding General Plan and Development Code Designations: North - Residential South - Residential East - Residential West - Residential ITEM I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENT. PM 11934 - L. A. CHANCO, INCOR.POR"TED OECEMBE,R 14, 1988 PAGE 2 F. Site Characteristics: lde site contains an existing house on proposed parcel 1 with an existing barn on proposed parcel 2. The land slopes approximately 3% to the south. II. ANALYSIS: The purpose of this Parcel Map is to create 2 separate parcels. The existing house will remain on parcel 1 and parcel 2 will become a portion of the future Tentative Tract 14123, which is currently +n the review procesn (Exhibit "C "). The reet improvements along Archibald Avenue are currently under con..zuction as part of a City Capittkl Improvement Project. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:' The applicant completed Part I of the Inf i�.y -.Stu-0.- to . conducted a field investigation and completed Part V of the Initial Study. No adverse impacts upon the environaAiint are anticipated as a result of this project. Therefore, issuance of-Negative DeclTration is appropriate. I4. CORRES')ONDENCE: Notice of Public !tearing have been sent to surrounding �ropertr owners and placed in the Daily Raport Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been rzmpleted. V. RECOMMENDATION, It is recommended that the Planning Commissicn consider ail input and el(ront;s of the Tentative parcel Map. If after such consideration, the Cotmission can recoammnd approval, then the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, Barrye R. Hanson Senior Civil Engineer BRH;JS :dlw Attachments: Vicinity Map (Exhibit "A ") Tentative Msp (Exhibit "B ") Future Tentative Tract 1D4126 (Exhibit "C ") Resolution and Recommended Conditions of Approval Ll 11 is Oct OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I fiTn: V ! P-1 R1 T **4 MRS 1 �, �� yy` I p r 7 w O a O or ie a oll ;4 11-10 on mm mom I t I{. ` } .,�[,T,ry. sans mo sirs asm i Nt s w 'fi � � , � � ` �'���n��yP �•� ' ♦ Melp. W w6�MR Mai ILY M. � '� r y,y� !ji •4 ��1119 �6I Mi 1d.0. 11tR i♦ 5, 11 , (� y t+ue AA, r 'asav- A 41,2 vj L V V 70 , WRo K I� CrrY OF RANCHO CUCAMi3NGA ENCTUMEMG DrVMION E Ill of •1V- -fr- ref— ii— sE --- -+ y Fl-�) ill i� PAR-t , MAP IZOo- 'TT' ,j'€,R. TENTATIVE MA C I� f ^' I� f. I l TRACT No. 14125 11, DIY teal °r vi °.►wia mirk Lr'1W M IW ' Quati 4;"f qa 10 IN UX H Mi N M iW, ocroagrc .�aa RANCHO CUC.AMONGA N PAPMEL MAP FE9S& wna FUTUIXE TENT 'TRACT 141 c ,R C. ft 1 RESOLUTION NO, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP - NUMBER 11934, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE APPROXIMATELY ISO FEET SOUTH OF LEMON AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS In SUPPORT THEREOOF. APN 201- 252 -03 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 11934, submitted by L. A. Chanco, Incorporated, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 2 parcels, the rear property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, identified as APN(s) 2O1- 252 -03, located on the east side of Archibald Avenue approximately 150 feet south of Lemon Avenue;. and WHEREAS, on December 14, 1988, the Planning Coemaistioo held a duly advertised public hearing for the above described map. FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAI+fONGA PLANING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suita :1?e for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial enuironmtntal damp% public health problems or have Ae.verse affects on abutting properv. SECTION 2: This Comission finds and certifies that the project has been reviiiia_RF considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, Ltis Commission hereby issues a Rogative Declaration. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 11934 is hereby approved eubject to the ttached Standard Conditions and the following Special Conditions: 11 PLANNING COWISSION RESOLUTIO NO. PM NO. 11934 - L. A. CHANCO, INC. DECEMBER 14, 1988 PAGE 2 SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunication and elect cal) on the project side of Archibald Avenue shall be under;,rWaded along the entire project frontage (both parcels i and 2) extending to the first pale offsite (north and south), prior to Occupancy of any buildings within Parce. 2. The Developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover ones half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. 2. The applicant shall reimburse to the City the cost for construction of one -half width street improvement,, along the Archibald Avenue frontage of parcels 1 and 2 prior to recordation of the final Parcel I#AP,, APPROYE'h AND ADOPTED THIS 14TR ►)aY OF DECEMBER 1988. PLANNING COMrSSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCWNGA Bt: — ""— t'arry c 'lei ;: v a rman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Wreta y I, Rrad Buller, SLcretary of the Planning Comissiop of the City of Raeicho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing 4b:solutjon was duly and regularly Introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commissfi_-! of eke City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Lowission held on the 14th day of December, 1988, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: WMISSIOHERS: NOES: COMISSIONERS: ASSENT: COWISSIONERS: E2 EI 0 P w C o' 0 A y Q � s N f Y 'M y Y IS su p it P r z �� ,1 4 • i u a M i ! =a - 3 �r 1 1 S. }} �t 3a 3Y aY i�w S `$ His 1 33g gig . r g �� �Y _ iurY ari ego �.� I` °a_ a � - ..rab al fit; j_$fg ay �a 5 J.vO 'ail s « �w a J w wo Hik,- U °. ti�e6 � �Z C"�_° +w� �ps�paty�ty�� `�{�,� \OY Nei 0� eNY. VIML.) UB sit 1 f Y 'M y Y IS su p it P r z �� ,1 4 • i u a M i ! =a - 3 �r 1 1 S. }} �t 3a 3Y _4z as i�w S His 1 33g gig . r g �� �Y _ iurY ari ..rab «k al fit; j_$fg ill Zip J.vO t'O i V °t Y Hy "*wfOr Wny U= =ms s 3 W x~ � a fi zz C yy l O • tx `ice .C^! 3 � a4 � - F 5A � I � u J G y u r o` s •WeY� y ti � yry �. U= =ms s 3 W x~ � a fi zz C yy l O • tx `ice .C^! 3 � a4 a y 11 rRI � - F 5A � I � a y 11 rRI '1 Substitute Special Conditions for Parcel Map 11934 Pg. 1 -7 2. The following relating to the Archibald Avenue frontage of both Parcels 1 and Z shall be completed upon devalopmeAt of Parcel 2: a. Tye cost of construction of one-half width street improvements fronting both Parcels 1 and 2 shall be reimbursed to the City, i b. The existing temporary retaining walls located within the street right -of -way shall be relocated outside the street right -of -sway, and c. Any missini street improvements including landscaping shall be instailed. ri CITY, OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: December 14, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FRD<S: Tan Orahn, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: DR 88 -26 — SMITH G�`M01y� n O z C: 197,E i 1 Staff recommends this item be continued to the January 25, 1958 Planning Commission meeting, with the consent of the applicant, to further address design issues that have arisen since writing the staff report. These design issues will be reviewed at the January 5, 1988 Deign Review Committee meeting. --- -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG& STAFF REEPORT DATE. December 14, 198$ TO; Chairman and Members of t)e Manning C*Mmission FROM; a ^►d 8uiier, City Planner gy; Torn Grahn, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: E*1IRGNMENTAL ASSESSMENT Ala} DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -25 - li - e a ono Severn agar n un s o an e"x` s ing apartment complex cOnsisi €ng of 63 units on 5.33 acres a land in the Medium Residential District (8 -24 dwelling units per acre), located on the east side of Archibald Avenue, south of Church Street - APN. 1077432 - 25. & Action Rw ested: Approval of the Site Plan, Grading Plan, ai ndscape an, wild ing elevations and the issuance of a Negative Declaration. 8. Prai +,ct Densit 13.1133 dwelling. units per acre (proposed) C. Surrounding �La�nd Use and 2onin z 'l sir n! din anl: ?i"ce o ess onai South Marlborough Villas; Medium Residential (4 »8 dwelling units per acre) East » Marlborough Villas, Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) West ` Single Family Residential; Low Residential (2 -4 Per D. General Man " Desi nations, ec site ie dentiai (8-14 dwelling units Per acre) North - Office South Medium Re, s €dential (844 dwelling units ppr acre) sagiR ft li�enl units - s de a(2- 4dwlligun units Per Per E. Site rNiracteristics-� The protect site is located directly as ex s ng apar .it complex, Vegetation on the site , nsists (,nly of seasonal grasses. PLANNING Ct MISSID' STAFF REPORT DR 88 -26 - SMITH December 14, 1988 Page 2 II. A�9At,YSIS, A. General* This project is an extension of an existing »3 tiiit apartmen complex. The %tension will consist of seven (7) three - bedroom apartment units, each unit is comprised of r approximately 1,135 square feet, plu$, an enclosed two -car garage. B. Design Raview Committee: The proposed s „4 plan, landscape p`la`n, an u ng a eva ons were reviewed o� the Committee on Nove+aber 17, 1 88 (Bl a�kesl ey, Buller, Chi tieala , The Comrmi ttee recommended approval of the project subject tp the following: f 1. Fifty percet,,:_';bf the total required covered parking spaces Vor the entire complex should be within garages. 2. The chain link fence along the north property line should be removed and a decorative block wall should be installed, The wall should be consistent with the walls along the east and south property li »as final wall design should be included on the 'landscape plan. 3. Improvements to the Archibald Avenue streetscape should include: a. landscaping consistent with the landscape concept for Archibald Avenge including street trees, meandering sidewalk, beaming, etc. Contact the Engineering Division for specifications. b. Removal of the 3 foot high block wall. 4. The architdtture on units facing Archibald Avenue should be up9i-i4pd 4 include: a. Installation of tile roofs, unless the applicant provides ,justification that the building cannot suppvt the additional weight. b. Add fascia boards to the exposed ceiling joists, i c. Upgrade the light fixtures. d. Provide patios of varying widths. The Committee recommended using a 2 foot fence of natural stone and Z feet (approximately) of wrought iron around the patios. Samples of the product should be - abmitted Far review and approval by the City Planner. PLANNINr,, 'rMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 88 4 3MITN December, vf, I988 Page 3 rk. Tile roofs should be provided on the new units and garages. 6. Remove the existing asphalt between the existing and proposed units to the southeast corner of the tennis court and landscape the area. C. Environmental Assessment: Staff has completed the nv ronmen Checklist ar-d found' no significant adverse Anvironmental impacts as a result of this project. If the Cowission concurs with these findings, the issuance of a Negative Declaration would be in order. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with _.he General an and ffe-4-0—opment Cpde. The project will not be detrimental to the public health or safety, or cateie nuisapees or significant adverse environmental impacts. In ao,itiop. the proposed use and the site plan, together with.- the rec�Awnded conditions of approval, are in compliance with applicable provisions of the Development Code and City Standards. IV. CORRESPONOF'xt :: -(Ms item has been advertised in The Daily Report newspaper as. "public hearing and notices have been sent to all property caners within 300 feet of this site, V. RECOWENDATION: Staff reccxmmmends the Planning Commission approve Development ' Re`view 88.28 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions and issuance of a Negative pAclaration. R'es tf 11y u tted, ad Buller City Planner 88:TG:mig Attachments: Exhibit "A" -,Site Utilisation Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" Conceptu�,i Landixape Plan Exhibit "D" - Buildir.4 M evatA ons Exhibit "E" - Floor Plan,, Rfsolution of Approval with 6nditions w J i Adak :x wo ran 1p r. i 3 mom Iras a 4 r� T. x .l mow C C. a.. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NORTH *t*,� et���t2� , •1 0 11 N" C TITLE: l V6 BAs � TYW.AL f Wat "RAW WAVATI@M tI 1 s��d• i. i TTVWAL n* "RAM NMATUM r7 rr'r ■r.•o water rnw1t !R r-d i��Jm I �lm I #liliiM*t-mj im ........... TTPWAL ft" awthm N"A"m OTTV '#" A 'kTn"^ fl't Tn .4 # VI t{I _Al ly"A e l i:•\ #1�Ci 4>wf.{t"f3 I G t EI I ' rf F sic._ K'1 'Cily or ITEM: 1 w i i %7 it �i \ �d �I i ,i 1 w i i %7 it �i 11 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTIGN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -26, FOR THE ADDITION OF SEVEN (7) APARTMENT UNITS TO AN EXISTING APARTMENT COMPLEX' CONSISTING, OF 63 UNITS ON 5,33 ACRES OF LAW, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, SOUTH OF CHURCH STREET, IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. APN: 1677- 332 -25.. A. Recitals. (i) Alan Smith has filed rn application for the approval of Development Review No. 88-26 as descr4" in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the. Ject Development Review request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On the 14th of Dec.imber, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conductO a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the C,yy of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented t,5 this Commission during the above - referenced meeting on DL.rmber 14, 1988, iaciuding written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows. (a) The application applies to property located at 7781 Archibald Avenue with a street frontage of 380.00 feet and lot depth of 611.00 feet and is presently improved with 63 apartment units; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is vacant, the property to the south and east of that site consists of condominiums (Marlborough Villas), and the property to the nest is single .family residences. 3. Based upon the substantial evid:.nce presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and L�.L PLANNING C"ISSION R2SDLMON NO. l DR 88426 - SMI,fi; Oecemier 14, I98B PiNge 2 i i (b; 71st the proposed use is in accord with the j objective o the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; xnd (c) That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the 1 Devel.opment Code; and (d) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety;, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or impeoveOnts in the vicinity; 4. This t oWssion hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in craaptiance with the California Environntal Quality AC61 of 1970 and, farther, this Commission hereby issues .a Ragative Declaration, S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth 'in paragraph 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commissijn hereby appr1oves the appVcation° subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the atta'OiA Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this refaretr;e, Planning Division (1) Ft ty percent of the total required covered parking spaces for .the entire complex shall be within garages. (2) The chain link fence alcng the north property lire shall be removed and a decorative block wall shall be installed. The watt zhalt be consiw tent with the walls alorU the cast aid South property lines. This will rewire an upgrade of the existing wails along the east and south elevations as they are constructed out of precision block. The final wall design shall be included on the Landscape Plan and Shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior, to the issuance of building permits. tar The three (3) foot high block wall along Archibald Avenue shall be removed. (4) The architecture of those existing units facing Archibald .Avenue shall be upgraded to include, a. Installation of Vile roofs (provided the roof can support. the additional weight). b. Add fascia Boards to the exposed ceiling joists. PLANNING COWISSION RESOLUTION NO. OR 88 -26 - SMITH December 14, 1988 Page 3 c. Upgrade the night fixtures. d, ProvidE ;ratios of varying iidths. Building material samples shall be submitted fGr review and approval by the City Planner prior to th* issuance of building permits. (5) Tile roofs shall be provided on the new units and garages. (6) Replace the existing asphalt between the existing and proposed units to the southeast cornet* of the tennis court, with lindscaped area. This landscaped area shall ba, included ire the Landscape Plans. (7) The propaied carports adjacent to the Fire hydrant on the south side of t:he existing units shall be relocated so as not to interfere with Fire Department access. Engineering Division (1) She southerly drive approach shall be reconstructed to City Standard No. 30r,,. 35 feet wide. (2) -The northerly drive approach shall be constructed to City Standard No. 306, S5 feett wide, with the southerly curb return aligning with the south elge of the drive aisle. (3) The Archibald Parkway shall be relandscaped to conform with the findings of the Archibald Avenue Parkway Beautificatirn Study. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND AM)PT'.D TNTS 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1'88. PLANNING C"ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: I' arry T. ftNiel, Chairman - — I AiLEST: � r-`�ad"Buller, Secretary" PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVION NO. DR 88-26 - SHITkI December 14, 1988 Page, 4 I, grad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of r,�a City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereb;' certify-that the foregoing Reso? 'ion was duly and regularly intr9duced,' passed, ind adopted by the P10,Ang Com►iWon of the City of Rancho Cuca�onga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Coamission held l t� w z a �� w o ^U Vg a At w � �wY a. -Y.si ri P..e1va'�5i33 Ytyywr' sE wTIL ��" � "Oe IL HT0i olu. ✓N �C �p� ✓ M`A z Slur s ^�✓ "qYN�$ �'•'"y= NLo��YCAwL A�Yi jail- pit tilt• O "q� YY✓ N✓q� S Y y.• ^.V wy 'eY,.0 SY �.�OG Ns yap •iYa... 0i"j N Yp�r xw. y`�i�0'Y p Y A�r � :N aa °� °✓ O N �6 � Y � � O� O� 'p^ � v+�i �� p� j ^'.. 1. ag Wa - wYW w°+ �roYA 'b t �O ■pr ..' U. �g � aN • n-11 2rZve C N$$V .4. 1 ^ wM144 L• rr CC ,Rw M_.« 9 ✓ 6� g y� Y 0 N C V� O�(� w V ° ° Q � m � /�� �J Yy t cp CCCCCC OY rrry � ✓�`Y J.UH1 ✓ M` 6^ 'Y rG Ali z tt W 0 N R'g t siq! b�— w- b c. ariop. 7 �iA t± � �� �g✓�a3��� 1LL ` M ✓¢ ��■ y� �� ��Vp���y VIA til- Sµ �Q�Ntr gj tits p i s�1� yCCYti S p;iJ 49 ', Y �� J � N 1'/ d• Vf F� tb - sr-j YYp.`•aM lula'k spa_:: fixat `.. ;fir 3'• is �i �i �i � •i � i 1i i L1 !Q sea. -still .k,).,—TL 1-41 1 0131 21 dL ;r� ►° 8: �' � is '.! Y.G. MQ ON�. ���K� err g�ys �]{ M � ■ *� L Q Y s yY M�{yy� �wsyy` yN�M mw ei= lab VCMYM ts iS p i M YfYaY� Yom ~� M���4 M `ip YM L 4O e: T-17 El i r. O S W W d (MO1W ,Poor Quality w °.Y �O ^ se .fe 3E��4}}4��v.�ao �+Y��� .. a��i�r Y -.x ^io gv u—'a' me S Y x`i�o '�N '� $'� � +«Y,ggS�'b•o$°�i:s, a4�o 3 qa�S ns°in��� .�^w•t ^lib ^ p` ` yAN 'Y �' f�M05 'y'G UY• q`eo Ny�y��YwMr ^� Ow: it ago i N. �^ A ^� � `Y •Y 4N` S '� oyy Z y CNw > y >N O � •"Y � SS 9 Y 1 -L 40` P1a0iO " : N..` ••Y�ii ASH z Yz N 4 NNV ^o R g ^g�M Na N.N KM^ KN YNQi MNi .CNY iC.J 6 <Y 1i1.1N 1:21 ISH H 2§ i = WX r Y N �gas; gs`rb '�Nw S �^ Aw ^a� EM YyNN 8��' Y M a0 pTO. C�c'tl 3 y•� ^.v V Y. N 3 Rip i ^ �� u~ • 4 M a I Y 4 r V N� M HNp Py ^ jig tl; Yy; Y� Y yN O tl� O �y +Y C p1yY/ t N tl n.rN q•6r VVVV >NYC^ NMe YO �L pYp OuNu Y_ Y 0 .Yid± Yy y>• p'� 00 Eyal. y �C.. �� V `0.N S 40i V YyySM N_Ni y; Kw•N� KiO �.i a KdN MO.N <.V z A O N.. iC A' M N rl �i Ni r. til i r Y m r J S S > M vatM > y 4� 11 Y O O p� Y .q N � O • Ki` � ■M}mN� w r0 s K N N = N � Y y a 4 7Y1S����6 Y 4 0 ■ • Xif��i9g� '^•NCe�Y^4 �Y� O�MSQ Y6y■ L yy NcyyxY, ,, Wi p�NM•uw M i .fs :tea "ggCo�`L' ga g g € ^y1K hij x .i ..,, ^^ « �iy Y�YYV u p 2 EX' X =nil_ Y� 11 �^.4V qO . r� g` Yri`- .. jj`Y fV.y t Y p} w N pCpOS� YOM 0. Oq. pry M V N y ■ � i �yyyw� 6C , ^a �i ' y i ffu G ♦ 3 �M Y � «ig V y ^ i _ i L ff L 1 Y 'J �y N gill i - }� Y Y Q H O My d_ �1 9YY �A- li Im « L G YG g } y�r c 4 r b4,_ If�O.'3 3�wc`x`$ -��w � « i` +8`.lY�' pb$`r`s�C�i .Y$` _`� " 3YL N � \ I N w %l � .. =i a "i k 'y� yr � Y w 9, wig fy {� a S± ♦p•$ ��{ f �• lr VY1p0 p�� O��w qq�y�« �ijt_ff �q�V �.y1Y4 N N � js« N ~fie y N�N �` NAP• MM `�~ �MOG My3�L .3 g wwj N aY p±± \3Y1 P y yy.�eN ` �gN VVO M«Y wry w i % ;►. �.ii s -1 Oil Y! pis; $ °,; Yt Y = p ;Gi Zo qio ii `O Y�,JJ CQN`OM {yq�. M M wq^ 6Y1 -« yMNj'y���.t i ` f(• ■.�Y8' fy ■�.�4 `� r N'G YY N N iii' JL�•'. �C FP'K w Q` ♦� � �M W1► W R E �4 MM w w _ �� 11 u R 0. 11 0 5 r ° � 1 V V yam++ °. �. ;re rrrC�3 -� Y��i O 4 Yt �! Nwa Big Y.3� �C..V V�0 &4 e u P 6 • rM v� Y ^° Ay rs yv M_ Y� �Y Y M N C^ Y M L N a OH00al POpf OWflty 1 L Y - Y N sp 7 AS O L iO•S� yr A V ■N�' V LM Y 4 .pat S L V A ^. Y~Y~�� L A��S Ow M �► - M OA i � A S$ F� A Y �� •Y L 0 K N � are exec ~ L A !jai H p pp I e wY p° pN�,y N3 W -w "= Ga��i ~H 7i•.4•� o4 - 4M P ci ?4E iC.� A a0L1 Q7P IS i ,il o a 3A 4a� rai 1 88y ^q' FAQ° w'p g VILE 1� n Yg � Q s l l I IT. ^_ s 4� :fir,, X Z, M«, Y !v (y > DI, * A IUI ; Y a e Ai u oftlymd € OualhY s. 4 NN Mq! V g M `Y ryYqp O L M ]W� y � � O ~ � � RM � ppGV 4 $ O .cOa a=Qa q Y YY4• M "A L «r! 5g's; -DYE h 111 1X spy y� tt a ya Y M W. a.« L s° Y O y a± k � N N O Z. r i Yx8 ; S 8 ' �t "w a SS L � 3 q�q+ wn Sid _g Y ° /� aN Lk .g fl =a� i1,1 �3 #6 �}G ga Y�p Y S x G yy si.'1W i1_� N� sVy -���aw y��Q '� �` {� '�a � � • e 11D 4.4 all 8 'it O ~ V «� u =g s u � L Y a,x L i L is I� 6 � d N r L M N N N at! w � ( V 1 1 B � N it "�• YO •V � O q ♦ L Y � ■ N � M v m w « N 8 u w iiii YY 101 � $$ YYO� "�iY M s � e ?j yy Y lit wWg R sr � Ya u it it n A U I a� =' Y N W 21 V i� Csa Y. v 2 a, e+ In , .I a at 5-b U a�' g�g� 6 R Y ♦V yM tl+ ` Y ~O � O Y CV? � §v ~!!ZA ~� L O tl G Y Y � M N Rai 1 IV Z22 3 It �a N Y N jd y flri� �M vm�K is <w LI -C A 4 Original Poor Quailty r�s s s o O N yy N iiii � � M y y� MY • • � �L + +V y12 Y L M A M M Y Y i t N fi O V o sp s O■ ®C y a ^� w r' 0 -5 Rai y.".N YYC y e yy s■ y A yLy ail. i N." �1t19 M�a T pp M Y p0. Ytl� go� k....A ism awa E r,ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA: STAFF REPORT DATE: December 14, 198f4 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM; Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Steve Hayes, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASStSSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88-45 91 GARDEN. RESTAURANT - A request to es a s e sa e of ar for or on -site consumption in an existing 2,160 square foot restaurant on 4.05 acres of land in the Rancho Cucamonga Village Shopping Center located at the northeast corner or Foothill Boulevard and Ramona Avenue - APH: 1077 - 521 -34 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Re_wested: Approval of a Conditioner Use Permit and issuance o a gative Declaration. D. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - AparVmeen r—q e� d Density Residential (8-1$ dwelling units per acre) South - Mobile Home Park; Medium Density Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) East - Restaurant; Commercial Office West - Service Station; Cmmtmercial Office and Lori Density Residential (2-4 daeliing units per acre) C. General Plan _Designations: 'Rro lect. site -- uommlerciaTT North - Medium Residential (844 dwelling units per acre) South Medium Residential l$ -14 dwelling units per acre) East Commmerci :l West, - Co+mmercial and Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) 0. Site Characteristics: The Siam Garden Restaurant is located hin an ex s n Aunity Commercial Shopping Center (Rancho Cucamonga Village which intlades one market, three restaurant, and other specialty shops. PLANNING COWISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 88.45 - SIAM GARDEN RESTAURANT December 14, 1988 Page 2 E. Parking Calculations: Nu;6er of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use footage Ratio Required Provided Retail /Commercial 35,320 11/250 142 '53 sq. ft. Restaurants (3) 6,000 1/100 60 60. sq. f+-, > Total 41,320 202 213 The appliant is not proposing to increase the square footage of the restaurant. rtence, the existing partying situation satisfies the minima requirements of the City. F. Applicable __Reg�ulations,: The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, c on "9.7.2, state's that vestaurants serving alcoholic beverages require 1 Conditiendi Ilse Permit when Located within the Community Coaeserctal DV, Pict. II'. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is requesting a general alcoholic -7erage license for an W sting restaurant. The addition of the sale of aic&ol for consumption 'm the premises is not expected to increase business significantly. The purrose of the Conditional Use Permit process is to create flexibili *r, necessary to achieve the objectives of the Development Code, General Plan and applicable Specific Plans. Selected uses in each district are allowed only subject to the grar`4ing of a Conditional Use Permit, because of their unique site development requirements and opereting characteristics, which special consideration in order to operate in a mannev compatible with surrounding uses. The Conditional ')se PermiZ process is intended to afford an opportunity for broad pub is view and evaluation of those requirements and cnaracteristics, to provide adequate mitigation of any potetiaily adverse impacts, and to ensure that a'l site development regulations and performance standards are provided in accordance with the Development Code and applicable Specific Plans. The Planning Commission is authorized to grant Conditional Use Permits to achieve these purposes and to impose reasonable conditions. Conditions may include, but not be limited to, UM E2 PLANNING C "ISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 88 -45 - SIAM GARDEN RESTAURANT December 14,. 1988 Page 3 regulation of signs; regulations of hours and /or other characteristics of operation; requir�6ments +tor periodical review by the Planning Coracission, and such oYhEr conditions as ",ie Commission may deem ndcesa .; to ensure compatibility with surrounding uses, to preserve the health, safety, and welfare, and to enable the Commission to make firaings required by the Development Code. B. Compatibility: The applicant does not intend to modify the exo Wours of operation (see Exhibit "D ") nor their philosophy of operation, which has beeii that of a fam'ly restaurant. The applicant proposes to add cocktails to their existing menu of kQer -wine and orierotal food and does not intend to change their hours of operation. 'therefore, there would be ro changes in the operation of the restaurant. Other businesses on -site are also open to within an hour more or less of 10;00 p.m. includIti the Ramona Market,. the Wherehouse Record Store and two other restaueants. Overall, the sales of alcohol should not produce any .changes in the operation as Seen from the outside. Therefrre, no adverse impacts should be felt by neighboring businesses or properties. C. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completecl by the applicant. Staff has c- meted Part I1 of the Environmental Checklist and has found r- ,nificant impact: on the environment as a result of this pro3. III. FACTS FOR F'_NDINGS:. 1. The proposed use is in accordance with the ieneral Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the Foothill 8oulcvard Specific Plan in which the site is located. 2. The prosed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or :materially injurious to properties or improarwnts in the vicinitit. 3. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item ,has been advertised as a public hearing in the a —'�R�eep�o��rt__ newspaper, and properly posted, and notices sent to of property within 300 `eet of the project. X'3 PLANNING C"ISSIUN STAFF REPORT CUP 88-45 - SIM GARDEN RESTAURANT, Decunber 14, 1588 Page 4 V. RECN$ATI : Staff recommends and issuance of a ;4 ipar yal of Conditional. Use Negttive Declaration through 'zpti . of a attached Resolution. R pectful fitted Brad Bral"1I City Plar} ;er l' BB :SH:mlg &Uchmeuts: Exhibit "A" - Lor..'fon Map Exhibit, V - Site Pl an Exhibit "C" _ - ne cor Plan Exhibit "D" -,Letter from Applicant Resolution of Approval j f ,64117. #S ale W'r - - -_A uuuuuuu T 'go,o 74,4,// NQRT kXNCHO (714) 945 -1644 vas e af�,r� j4:4,4 v Jtvona r ■ ■ ■ 5 El a D Fl ❑ x+` D ` ' CAP. 4,( CISAAvda � 31f o+C .bs# tt P.o,A- CITY O IANCHO CUCA ONGA ITE . :QP TITLE. _10, �<<.� 99so 3+ `- CA 94i30 (744) 945-1644 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Departnlont Baseline Rd, Rancho Cucamonga, Ca., October 28th, 2989 Re: Conditional Use Permit Hon - Construction Siam Garden Restaurant 9950 Foothill Blvd. 8S Rancho Cucamonga, Cu., 92701 To W .0a rt May Concern: The purpose of this letter is to outline need for a conditional use permit non construction . This permit is needed for use of on -sit* cocktails in our easisttng business, the Stan Garden Restaurant. We have been in business for a year and four montba. The serving of cocktails will supplement one emanating menu of bear -trine and oriental road. At this time we will not be installing a separate bar or lounge area In the restaurant but purpose to nix aoetnils .'n the oxsisting kitchen area and serve t4on to our customers I'm the exs;nting dining area. ThV; will not add any addttional hours to our da} of business nor will It add any additional employees. The addition of hard liquor to our menu will not bring any negative impact on th&-shopping center environment or neighborhood. p ITY O TT A CAM"ONGA Stneorly Fred Nelson Jr. Owner Z "14, Ural S. S. Nelsen Owne ITEM: _ f L"' 29"lL, TITLE: Lef4e -- Frj.�, 4,a i Ll �1 11 11 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88 -45 FOR THE SALE OF HARD LIQUOR FOR ON -SITE CONSUMPTION In AN EXISTING 2,160 SQUARE FEET RESTAURANT ON 4,95 ACRES OF LAND IN THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER LOCA'T'ED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND RAMONA AVENUE IN THr,, C"UNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND K KING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. - APNS 1077- 621 -34 A. Recitals. (1) Siam Garden Restaurant has filed an application for the Issuance of the Conditi: °nal Use Permit No. 88-45 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application'. (ii) On the 14th of December, 1988, the Plar>jing Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said.hearing•on that date. (iii`) All legal prerequi %ices to the adoption of this Resolution have occArred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolul ion are true and corrart. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission de ~ing the above- referenced public hearing on December 14, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Co, mission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the northeast corner of Foothill Bvlevard and Ramora Avenue with a street frontage of 632.22 feet and lot depth of 280.96 feet and is presently Improved with a Commercial /Retail Center; and (b) The application is for the incidental sales of alcoholic t verages as menu items in conjunction with the sales of food. (c) The property to the north of the subject site is resi-.APntial, the property to the south of that site consists of a mobile home park, the property to the east is commercial, and the property to the west is commercial. PLANNING COMIMITOM RESOt.LMON N0. CUP 88-45 - SIAM GARDEN RESTAURMT December 14, 1988 Page 2 (d) The application comtenp:tat:es the addition of cocktails to the existing restaurant menu of oriental cw ;ne and beer /wine. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon tht ;,pacific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Comm ssion hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the prop"ed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Develrprnent Code and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in wh'ch the site is located. (b) That the proposed uses 'ogether with the conditions applicabIt thereto, will not be detri0ental to the public hc- ith, safety, or welfare, or materially trjurious V% properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Developrent Code and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. 4. -This Co emission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Ervironmental i Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration, 1 S. Based upon the findings and Conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2, 3 and 4 above, this Comission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. Planning Division 1. This approval shall apply to the ser ing of alcoholic bever� Qs only. 2. Approval of this request steal) not waive ccopliance with all sections of the Foothill Specific plan; all applicable City Ordinances, Foothill Fire District requirements and Public Health codes. 3. Any modification, expansion or other change in operatign will require a revision to the Conditional Use Permit. a 4. All signage shall be designed in conformance with the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance cnd applicable Uniform Sign Program and shall reouire review and approval by t'ne Planning Division. PLANNING COWIrA0N RESOLUTION NO. CUP 89-45 - SIM GARRP RESTAURANT December 14, 1988---:,11 Page 3 ,J . The serving of alcoholic bevera e4 must be in conjunctioa with restaurant usage Vend the avail'01 ty of full listed menu items. The sale and serviaag of alcoholic beverages shall cease when such menu items are not availvhle to customers. 6.. The serving of alcohol in conjunction with restaurant usage may operate batieen the hours of 11 :00 a., and 11:00 p.m. 6. The Secretary to this Co�wission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF'DECFMBER, 1988. PLANNING COMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCMDNGA BY: "4� arry e Chairman � ATTEST: i3raa Buller.. Wc-retiry I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Comm asitmn of the City of P"I'cho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was dui_ and regularly introduced, sassed, and adopted by the Planning Commiv�i'ion of -'+ie City of Rancho Cucimon, , at a regular meeting of Lhe Planning Caemission hold on the 14th day of Dedefber, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COPBMISSIONERS: HOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMISSIONERS1 E l.,, r . • jar � � / I] 11 11 — CITY OF RANCHO CUrAMONGA STAFF R&IORT DATE: December 14, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning G.mission FRUM: BrOt,,.Buller, City Planner B "e Cindy thrris, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: MODIFICATIONS TO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AND DESIGN RF',IEW - A vaquest to modify conditios or pr—Ova rem ring a 5 foot earthen berm along Eiwsndc Avenue and size o« Eucalyptus replacement planting as well, as the Design Review of building elevations and Doi led Site Plan for a ' previously approved tract map consisting of 67 single family lots on 66.10 acres of land in the Very Low Residential D4strict (up to 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Highland - APR: 225 48141, 12, 13, 19, 20, 21 and 30. I. PROJECT )LT ST'S DESCRIPTION. A. Acticr Requested: Modification of ' C*nditions of A;aproval for as prep,ous y approved tentative— map 0 allow for a design solution along Etiwanda Avenue which is consistent with the policies of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and tci revive the tree replacement requirements. In addition, the applicant is requesting design review approval of building elevations and plot plans. B. Project Oensit�r, 1.43 dwelling units per acre. C. Scrrout :di;,. Land Use and Zonim: rrn -- VerY Low Resideffiiar--(1-2 dulling units per acre),. Etiwanda Specific Plan. South - Very low Residential; (1 -2 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda Specific Plan. East Very Scow Residential; (1 -2 dwelling units per atr2), Etiwanda Specific Plan. West Very Low Resi$* -,iat; (1 -2 dwelling units per acre),. Etiwanda Speciitc Flan. D. Genera, Plan Designations: ro eCr. 51te ='Very LOW Resfo4ntial (lass than 2 dwelling units per acre). Item L PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Tr 12870 - DALY HOMES December 14, 1988 Page 2 North - Very Lour Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre). bath - Very Cant Residential (less than 2 dwelling u;,its per acre). East - Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre). Best - Very Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre). E. Site Characteristics: The site is presently vacant except for ree cal w�'"ndrows around the perimeter. The site is bounded to the north by existing single family homes and to the south by the proposed Route 30 Freeway. II. ANALYSIS: A. Back round: The tentative map for this project was approved on anuart 28, 1987 for a tctal of 57 lots which range in size front 21, 216 square feet to 39,000 square feet. In addition to the Design Review for boildinr, elevations and plot plans the applicant is requesting to ri:yise the Conditior,s of Approval relating to the design on the sound mitigation barrier - 'along Etiwanda Avenue and the size of the tree replacement planting, S. General: The applicant is proposing a total of` 8 floor plans. All plans offer front -entry three car garages, however, plans 1, 2 and 4 also have a side entry garage option'. A total of 33 units will have side -entry g €: ages while 34 will have front - entry. ;,efts 1, 2 and 'i have 8 elevations each while Plan 3 has 4 elevati%,,ns. In ad3tior;, the units on Lots 1, 39, 40 and 67 have been plotted -At ar angle so that they front -on to Etiwanda Avenue tad hove received an enhanced arch'_" tueal treatment. T:te prolased floor plans van:-, in size f. r 2,158 square feet to 2,801 square feet. C. Design Review: The project was reviewed by the Design Review eei�e rroutil, Chitiea, Blakesley) on October 6, 1988, and again as a consent calendar item on November 17,`:988 (Buller, Chitiea, and Biakesley). At the November sleeting the Committee recomrmended approval subject to the following: 1. The applicant should work with staff in revisirg the I andscape plans to refine the streetscape design and determine appropriate sPE-cies of plants. 2. The ao 1cant should work with staff to deb ".erdsine vie desigi and placement of the neighborhood en:,,y accent Planting at the southwest corner o7 the site. DI LA PLANNING C"ISSION.STAFF RSPDRT TT V870 a DALY HOMES December 14, 1988 Page 3 3. The applicant may provide an upgraded option of the s4reetscape landscaping provided that significant features are held constant. 4. Additional detailing should be added to the garage door to the Plan 2 elevation on tot 39, See Exhibit J". 6. The right elevation of plan 4 an Cats 1 and 40 should be upgraded as follows;. 1) a hip roof should be contip!'ed around the right side of the unit in order to extend the Porch, and 2) the projecting roof over the garage op. the front elevation should be modified to a hip roof. The window adjacent to the trrutt entry should receive a treatment similar to that on the front elevation.. (The attached Exh*lts reflect These changos, Exh't It 'J ".) 6. A detail treatment, similar to that used on the front e' ry posts should be used on the rear heck posts for Cots 1 39, 40 and 67.. Exhibit "Jr. 7. A masonry treatment,, consistent with the exterior architectural detailing, 5WU& be used on the chimneys of Lots 1, 39, 40 and 67, rather than wood siding. Exhibit at. 8. On cots 1 and 40, wood Siding should be continued around the entire left elevation of Plan 4 and on the entry side of the garage where it would be visible tt the street. Toe 2npnpI csnt has provided wo6d siding on 411 elevatim% Exiaibit fr. 9. An enhanced architectural treatment should be added to the side and rear elevations particularly on the two story units. D. Etiwanda Sound Barrier; Recommendations of the 3caI►stical s u comp a as part of the Environmental Assessment for thi;c tract, required a S foot sound barrier along Etiwanda Avenue. The original Conditions of Approval spec:?f.ed that a 6 foot earthen bens be rrovIded as a Barrie,. Piwevet, the use of a berry would prevent the units from having 4, front orientation toward Etiwanda Avenue which is inconsistent with the poiicit�s of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Also, the berm would require units to "side -on" to a;t•iwanda Avenue which is not consistent with per r*ter treatments elsewhere along Etiwanda and its use would bo setting a design precedent for Etiwanda Avenue, nor h of Highland Avenue. In addition, due to PLA 41RG COMMISSION STAFF REPORT: TP 1870 - OALY HOMES December 14, 1958 Page 4 EM Building and Safety requirements for pool fencing, residents my have to locate the fencing on top of t»he berm it-eelf, creating a haphazard appearance. In place of the berm, the applicant is proposing a decorative masonry wall a sty co with rock pilasters and planter• pockets. The sound wdTl will eyUnd from the back of tho homes to the rear of thr, lots and continue a short distance along the Equestrian Trait. (See Exhibit E. Tree �2�e_pl_a_ce_ment Plantin , The applicant is also requesting ai t>7 a CondItlons o roval requiring 15 gallon size Eucalyptus maculate replacement planting bee revised to allow replacement planting with b gallon size trees. The request is consistent with the new wine ow planting requirement within the Etiwanda Specific Plan whice specifies 5 gallon size trees to be planted 8 feet on center. 111. FACTS FOR FINDINGS'\ The p: )ject is consistent with the General I n' an kve opmenni 'code, The project will not be detrimental to the public health old safety, or cause nuisance or significant adverse envir- vental'�impacts. In addition, the prcposed use, subdivision w.p and Conceptual Grading Plan, together with the Conditions of Approval, are lik complianci ,. with the applicable provisions of the Drvelo9ment Cow and City.Seandards. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been adver• 4td. at, a public hearing in The �a y Report newspaper, the prop's - posted and notices sent property to all p-- e�i- y owners within 300 feet of the pro:ect site. V. RE . ENDATEON: Staff records that tile. Planning Commission o 0 "o ification to the Conditions of Approval for the sound oa , der design and repl ar m eu jol antin as well as approve the :si .view of building elcvatloas and p of plans through the adop`ion f the attached Resolution and, Conditions of Approval. BraV:mlo er %.� Citner / BB: ii PLANNING c6mrSSTON STAFF REPORT TT 12870 - DALY HOMES December 14, 1988 Page 5 Attachments: Exhibit "A" Letter from Applicant;, Exhibit "B" .. Vte Ut lizatian Map Exhiuft 'C" Sjte and Grading Plans Exhfbit "D ".. Ian ds4ape Px'ans Exhibit "E" - Trm— Replacement Plan Exhibit "F" lfow' meter- Wall Details F- kiibit "G" Equeltrian Over? -�y Kqp Exhibit "H" ;:Elevations Exhibit "T"` - ,710pr Plans 'Exhibit "J' Et t inda Avenue Unit Elevations Resolution Modifyinq Cogditions_qf Ap proval for Tract 11870 Resolution Approving Design Review and Standard Conditions qP r Y �_ J7 October 6, 198S City Of Rancho Cucamonga P.O.. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91 ?3n Subject: Tract 412810 Dear Sirs: Per our Conditions of Approval for the above refercAced projoct, a: showed . S' earthen be;:-- as sound barriers along Etiwanda Avenue on lots 1, 39, 40 and 67. This complies with the final noise report prepared by van Houten s associates dated 9/13/6x, regarding this project. Ia addressing concerns from planning, we hn:e replaced the earth berms with a minimum 5' sound barrier constructed r.f concrete block/stucco over with rock columns at corner s per the re- cow.endation7 of your Planning Department a ;asistent with the final ngize report. This is shown on •ised gradino and I =doonpe plans.' At the same time, w ao request a correc- tion to be made in the Conditions of Approval regarding windrow replacement planting. The Conditions of Approval require that the tree replacement plar be in accordance with The Etiwanda Specific Plan, consisting of Evcalyptus Malcuiat *a (15 gallon). However, The Etiwanda Specific Plan states that trse replacement shall be with 5 a•,r!:on size traes. We wish to adhere to The Etiwanda Speci''::c P2 hr. re?viring 5 4alloi, size replacement F.lanting. With your approval, we a,a .tilling to comply with the above out - li4ed charsw and request that the City Planning Department re- commend .hk changes to the CiI.y Cruncil on our behalf. Respectfully,([ .._t^ Kuc;.I.Isky xnstructa.on Cori. dinator Jr PK: u l..-r 6 .1111 �•J 11 L-11. CITY Or", RANCHO Ci.' yiCXNGA -rcpt ..�:T� 6LP,l k PL- "�i ING CIL`I Q�i _ -� E.�:F {I[itT „ L C . _.._ r �f r w ^�r'ry',. i "W.n TaMM��i. .iMWKeMf ~3�Nf11tlfM� i�i� �� .an. Wail lam' RE _�.. Im I. wt .._ sire a t 1 CrrY OF ITEM: RANCHO CVCANMONGA TITLE-. 7 { e :CITY OF RANCHO RUC TITLE: -.� v 0 wjmt*o,-z'!elNlll wo CrTY OF RANCHO CUCAM014GA Vw- ITEM: TITLE: I \Q t-, CITY OF ITEM-0 RANCHO CUI` Q TITLE:- rt \Q t-, CITY OF ITEM-0 RANCHO CUI` Q TITLE:- I to I ,,CITY OF I- IT'sm- RANCHO UCAix*u0NGA TrrLg-. if m 12 'R7 ,,CITY OF I- IT'sm- RANCHO UCAix*u0NGA TrrLg-. if m 12 ':. BLOCK WALL '500th pr c , fl NORTR � CIS' ITEM RAIN(DR, 0 CUCAMOTTGA TITLYI-. akwkvve.T!'1 �aT�t :'�C�IY/11T 1 P �% _,...._.....,.,,� .L' :. 7 . — .. " . . ,y}� Citi Of RARGW {Ul'+199R(p rtsr +».r ITEM: RANCHO, -CUCAMONGA .. _`'- ar. wr._. w.w. «ia.M_•fld�'.'ra+wr._''v "r .i ... ... f... 6. <i. r Ll v �� 0701 -02 o l2- 1.4� -88 PC Agenda a 4 of 7 G L c, q CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ITEM: TITLE: 0 �vattaws 11 if fill .... i �� ! LZRX r all 06.1.w CITY OF, ITEM: AN, OHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: -�if� 'T.A� K ' i'V�. TiTUMM9`i' %NsrvzmTm. U-2 ran A V. ■ . n isLAN 1 �l.EirAT16WS 0 I�J ;," ,, fCI` i; . . ITEM: . CKO CUC ONGA TITLE: lc�� 7.11 A XT'tT'{`XYd LL. /1 nn r re. EZAAl Tn CITY OF L -q ITEM .... RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: � �r� u ae+t'�vAnoy PLAN 1 �+aT cHS�_, FS BEEN�� CITY OF ITEM: RANCHO CUCAM( NGA TITLE: giai� n, �i�• �Jlp l�RR dEYdj� PRAM 1 ELEYATi0tt3 l 1"AMr fl�f�II� a(j _CAL �I - - CITY OF ITEM: RANCHO C A TITLE:..._.���- f �N � 1 j °V \A� i. LfK •MA {IM\ •C1.94'�1•Ytl4 /C..9Y I .... \ i _ /• 1 _ L 1� H ../ 1 7111m, 11 Mi ew» L"2 lLtYATI�ltS A 0 CITY O RANCHO C CAMONGA w Wort IS3 I 4-Iii- a- . ITEM: j flit fl11 � ltl� j(N llli+� IA1 li tlll �� -CITY OF ITEM "RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: W A XTXTTXTd l r%TIYTL*,+T^Ikt J - .a, r�a►�.�ea+. :wc ��� irk z r ,,. El lu U CITY Or RAINCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING UNISON .L � c� VN( TH Tinz EXHUKT: ":55 • S+ALG= - _ { .n CITY OF ITIM RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: �- +wr► r CITY OF RANCHO GqCAMGNGA ob, pvtr C�yua!ijy r q=--V WTY OF L- RANCHO CUCAMONGA PT.ANT*ITViV,. nTVTqTnm, ITEM: 7ITLE: - el zw IL Ft Ofkilnal Poor Ovality to OF ITEM: RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE:- PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: AL-2. SCALE. W - °, o { s 1� R: r I t 6 e 1 r7 'CITY, OF ITEM RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: -2-041h= 10T A'VVTVtl ':'9 UTOMl►►1 12 1 1 I I AV { 6 y ' BLOCK WALL ,r►st pr.0p��y� bound u�•w.w NORTH CIS'' O F —2c I ITEM: RANCHO C UCAMO 'GA TITLE: yrYl , 01191naf.Poor Quality PLANNING CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG ITEM: I EXHIBRIT: SCALE: _ ...: —CA _ - , Cc", N WAYC1f0 CVCAIgM EOUESTRIAH ..�' OVERLAY MAP not xm PLANNING CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG ITEM: I EXHIBRIT: SCALE: `hoin ! boor # I CITY OF (ITEM: EM: RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: I- I - " .; - ` .- , I r. 'MINNIA i�om�m Mil PLANT �I CITY O _nHO CUC xA ITEM: TITLE; ffkug� ,mrsttsnvrn- U.Ll nn ■ ■ R �miim- Bit, HMO, Ill. Ski • r !r � � '- e�t. 11 11 CITY OF ITEM: RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE-* vati2n, L4 A % % Tx �N 1iw` -d'i .i... �(.1 iO W��1Y�fw awr J.I SJ R x; / t �f too 1 PLAY 1 ELEVATIONS F E MEN L;I1 S O RANCHO CUCAMONGA ITEM: -.... r.YT,J`TRi'r fir`r6 IrAT.P.- Ll jt •i •ir' t «IL PWL CITY OF RANCHO, .MI nT A 'kTVT %tom IMINYTOVI r I -1 A ITEM: TITLE: lg'W i diva "-.trr,n,c a+. /J-7 art k r v. A RANx ...v C evaas s KA", i PLANNING DIVISION L ITEM. EXHIBIT: SCALE. �w m 3 ;Ill nn� RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION 51 ITEM:.. TITLE: && OghW- EXHIBIT 20 SCALE. tz , ifim 4 .1 IIII t�I I It t! , IMAM r ► (! !! - J} �� � l ttt tat ►i�j�11 itY''ut�' fI: di it tt. ��+�iilit r t uu t )1J� /AU� ► ►Ii ? ►rt.t�� ei 1. �+"" — C ►11 �Il F„r.�'Tliu %:lJflt 1�1�... t :n et ■ettttR:. ti Td� Y CIrff OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION �j �1 ITEM TITLE: EXHIBIT; 11 a kTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION L- - 53 ITEM: TITLEt -Lie Li2 Lial6 EXHIBIT:, SCALE: !+! ��j�j����f� MJ Ifa�at CITY O RANCHO CUCAMOYGA PLANNING DIVISION i i xt ITBM: TITLE,- Eke EXHI$I s .may 3 -qr A UZ 119 lid 5iff-I all- W,ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISIO ITEM:, TITLE: SCAT EO. E All . ys- � f'TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, PANNING rI'VISIQN L -!3 7 ITEM: TITLE: EXHIBIT: SCALE: fvm I ELFWAW."s I mill I ".A ui Al 0 a Boom son IST 2 CITY OF RANCHO, ("UCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION -L - 5� ITEM: TITLE: EXHIBIT: *-!Z SCALE-., I E 11 . ,t t fs t ti if tt �s• •..ti iti fff 4 �i'1.ailfff u ►� a .,.. .. ,. It'll t 11d ff ;�ujf�1�� 11,11 'kTY OF ITEM- RANCHO C UCAMONGA TITLES PLANNING DIVISION t - cl EXHIBM r`''„ . SCALE.- I fill low nill!"i'll MW Uguv UUMMM CITY- OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION L_,CC ITEM: TITLE: EXHIBIT: SCALP: 0 Ll Front .arre�s pLAH 4 ELEVATIONS d � �Al1aN CITY O RANCHO CUCAMONGA ITEM: L+vest�r*n. cG 4A Oti A T V. �A ELEYAT7�I PLAN 4 BLE�FA`.X3N8 .r . CITY O ANC O CUCAMONGA ING DIVISION I EW TITLE: RYRTATT! A Z1 Qr'AT.r s. PLAN 4 a.�varr�aNS al OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 114G DIVISION ITEM: EXHI`EIT: � ��StALE: amw "P MR cirf or __ ITEM: PLANNTNr RANCHO " ,✓ V JALJ Tai-"E: I /L�t�t° if' /�.ttl•j: t } Y.T v 1.gTa _ tom= - Vv%rstoBnn. 1:0.f LE a .1,11PY OF HO CUCAMONGA nr x ?kT%YV%Tl4 lr %l'M TAILT me ism ITEM: TITLE: Icrr of; .. 2R CITY OF PLANNING DTi rp I t-;ITY OF ITEM: RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: �A�INING DIVISION L_4`7 EXHIBIT:L_-/'_ SCALE: is , mw ��i�a+ -r� Ta � �. '3 .# � � � -� � � ram. a 7jy ° "``' � `,� . RESOLUTION NO. 87 -ISA ok _RESOLUTIOV OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION ._ JTHE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MODIFYING TWO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TRACT NO. 12870 LMA "tD EAST OF ETIWAt4DA AVENUE AND NORTH, qF HIGHLAND IN; TRk"VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (1 -2 3WELLINC UNITS PER .ACRE), AND MING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT :'HEREOF. AP.., 225- 181 -11, 12, 13, 19, 20, 21 AND 30 A. Recitals. (i) Onoianuary 28, 1987, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution W. 87 -I6, thereby approving, subject to specified conditions, Tentative Tract 12870 which provides for the developa+.nt of 61 single family lots on 66.10 acresrof land within the Low Residential District. (ii) Oh October e, 1988, a request wes filed by Daly Homes of California to modify *.he Coiditions of Approval requiring a five foot bens along Etiwanda Avenue and 15 g r size windrow replacement plantfrgs. (iii) On the 14th of December, 1988, the Planning Cwwission•of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the apriication and concluded said hearing on that date. (iv) All legal prerecrtis+tes to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby fw(td, pct,% mined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho_C(Tamonga as follows. 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, P;,rt A, of this Resolution are tr3e and,-,orrect. 2. Based upon substantial evidence -,,.presented >to thi -4- `Commission during the above- referenced public hearing one December 14. 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this_ Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a.) The request to use a decorative 5 foot sound will rather than a 5 foot earthen berm is consistent with mitigat')n messures recommended in acoustical, report for th {_s yract; and b.) lbkN use of a decorative sound wall along E- Vwtnda Avenue wf 1 be consistan:t pith perimeter streetside »reaClents on 6 south side of the project site and eltewherew along .iwanda Avenue, and PLAN04G COWISSIOLL- �!ESMUTION N0. 87 -15A I T12870 - DALY HOMES December 14, 1988 Page f c.) The request to allow new windrow replacement, tree plantings to be 5 gallon in size is consistent with the requirements of the Etiwanda Specific Plan Section 6.41.300; and d.) Replacement planting of selected individual trees within *windrows that are to be preserved shall be 15 gallon size. .1. Based upon the substantial evidence presented t4 this commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth its paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a.) That tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Developmr.mt code, and specific plans; and b.) The design or improvements of the tentative t ,act is consistent with the General Plan, Development (,de, and Specific Plans; and c.) The site is p", ica'i,y_ suitable for the type, of development propose.--and d.) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and e.) The tentative tract is not likely to ^.ause serious pubiin health problems; and f.) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. Based upon - Bindings and conclusions sat forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above this Commission heresy approves the modified Conditions of Approval and Design Review application subject to each and every condition set forth below. C. Tract Map. Resolution W. 87.15 is hereby modified by changing Plalning sivision Conditions No. 2 and 6 to read as follows: n 2. A tree replacement plan shall be submitted to ;:4 City planner � for review and app oval, in accordance with Eti%;anda Specific i_-' 7:5 l PLANNING.CO TSSION RESOLUTION NO. 8`r 15A t, T12470 DALY ROME$ December 14, 14,38 Page 3 Plan requirements, showing new Eucalyptus �tindrows consisting of Eucalyptus maculata, 5 gallon size planted 8 feet on center, prior to issuance of a grading permit. 6. In accordance with'the acoustical study, a 5 foot decorative sound wall shall bt rego ;red along the project side of Etiwa.xia Avenue and a 7 foc high decorative masonry wall shall be required at the top of slope along the South tract houtidary. 5. The Secretar.t-to this "ommisslon shaiT certify to the adoption of this Rebolutio:.a APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14ra' DAY F DECEMBER, IM. PLANNING CCi+lAISSION OF THE CITY Of PANCHO CUCNOM BY: al arty T. MccHi-el , Chairman ATTEST; Brad U eK -SRUFe 3ry I, Ct°id Buller, Secretary of the Piannin COF71'' AN of the G►uy of Rancho Cccaponia, do hereby certify that the #or i -nit Reso`ution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopt PN nniiq Commission of the City of Rancho Cucatortga, at a regular nre�,n of the Qlan;ting fommission "bald on the lath day of Gager, 1_908, by thtr following vote -tc: -shit: AYES: COWaSSIONERS: NO:S: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONiERS: RESOLL TION Nil. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CtY M'ZIN of THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTNt VE TRACT 12870 LOCATED EAST OF ETIWANGA AVENUE AND NORTH OF NIGdLRND IN THG VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, .ENO KAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPOR7i THEREOF. APR: 225- 151 -11., 12, 13, 19, iza, 21 ANO 33 A. Recitals. (i) Dal;, iukts of California has filed an application for the approval of Design Review a Design Review application as deocribed % the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolut; can, the subject Development Review request is refevred to as "the application ". 'M On the if 14th, of Oeca:ber, 1980, the Planning Commission of the City it Ranchs Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and coicluded said meeting of ghat dace. (iii) 111 legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have .,ccurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the A ty of Panebo Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Comission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set torah to the Recitals, Part ,A, of this Resolution are true ana correcc. 2. Pased upon substantial evidence presented to this t- mission during 'L :e above- referenced meeting on Dc�,ember 14, 1988, including w,-itten and oral staff reports, this Conmaission hereby specifically finds as fo- FIows: (a) The application applies to property located at northr�st corner of Etiwanda Avenve and Highlands and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is partially developed with homes, the property' to the south of that site consists of vacant land, the property to the east is vacant land with scattered, ulder residences and thi property to the west is vacant. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and atpcn the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph I and 2 itbove, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: 40 1a) That the proposed project is consistent with the ob "tives of the Gotceral Plan; and e, Pt,ANNING COMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ; D R iT 12870 a Daly Homes December 14, 1988 Page 2 W That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes if the district in which the site is located, and (c) That the proposed use is in compliance with aach of the applicabia provisions of the Deveiopmant Core; and (d) That the praposed use, together with the conditions appli -table thereto, t1ll not be- detrimental to 'Zhe public health, safety, or welfare, or materially `njurious to properties or improvements in thy., vizinity. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that thn project has been reviewed and considered in ccmi fiance with the California Enviro!aelta1' Qualt��.x Act o; 1970 and, - further, ;his Cemission hereby isssfes a F0.9ative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set ";,r *.'i in parayrapl\s It 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves tip �.,lication subject AML to each and every condition set forth below and in ' .a (ttached Standard Conditicns attached `(aNeto an:i incorporated herein by, Ference, 1.3 The applicant shall work with staff in revising the lar_scape plans to refine the streetecape design and determine appropriate species of plants. 2.) The applicant shall woo with staff is determine the design and placement of the n-arhb►rF;'+od entry accent printing at the southwest corner of the site. .) The at)piicant � provide an upgraded option of the streetsc-,pe landscapf.i�, provided that significant features are held constant. 4.) An enhance-4 ar r-hi tectueek trea #j*nt shall by added to the side and rear elevationr par :ncularly on the two story units. p.r A reAsed E4.uestr,ian Overlay 1;ap shall be reviewed and approved by -,-'f prior* to the isslaauce of any. pernits. 6 ' 'Irtf ant. Con0tions of Approval, as contained in Resolution 87-, _ gyp, s7 -15A, shall apply. 7.) .. �eAeer shall be natural 5t:ine. 6. The Secretary i1A . -,44 Commission ;hall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. 1� PLANNING COMIWISSION RESOLUTION NO. 9R TT 12870 - Daly Fees December 14, 1988 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH ,QAY OF BECEM33ER, 1988. ;`CANNING COMMTSSIO�f ►1F ,THE CITY OF R.AtAiHO CUCAMONGA dY: . rry T. Niel, a rma.t ATTEST: Brad Bull re . 1, Ordd 8r V^ •,; Secretary),,.-, �f the manning , Comission� of the vity of ` Rancho Cocmnga, do ;hereby certiil, that the: foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed,` -Znd adopted by Cho Planning Ctss r_n of the City of !UGcho Cucanonga,, at a r gulag :i.eeting of tha Plann6og Craission held - on the 14th dai of December, 1988, by the fAlawing Vote -to -Wit: I AYES: COWMISSIONOS! NOES: COWISS!OKRS. qw ABSENT: LOMISSIONERS: i 4 e yy�� > aa{{ Otiginal Poor Q¢�y/, Oty tl f2���YGU9 sig WAa 7g :gL��g ONOp OT, JM LYO 4 N2 ; O q ■. ;f1 «> Y�:aLa@Aq N N M 110 O 6� V ri F kli vx- `g °�o6DDD3�o,''i�"€�cf.3 3g��. �e� +�`�'R� � =-•�• ���o�Z we a.O r3 Y^ �'_e •3Y 6 Y3O OY �V7+ 4{�j CA y9 �YM a •1 201 c,drddd x _ J T i O O Y i! III Zell i O $i \ Y U Its W A ri H f7.. 4 N ✓ r a u V I � s Bar �Atrit s a y O p 2 � s b° 7 So 0 kkk. esI f M Oriafnal poor Quality �I- . 1�r i M OY; Y ±O.H E%�COM it..: v Yii �bz V Is 2t �INN0. V�6 V N1N lip N 3 �Li] yy t $r +� �Y�LMgpyy� nis Yyvgtl{yy4�', 3.y��b. �4 �Y� 4.1 r•N � ~4Cp /_ �O Q �CN�3y3r �i •� ^Ol 0.S u �� `Qja•�YCS >.YS q ac s8a': � `o �•as. �,o�r1 v.$$1PillHHQ y G: Y. 4 N 1ti S Y r Y S W cr$ cN shTYe..r, "Ns u Itu • _ � � i qi' .�r1 a X � w i ~ Via" Z 11.'3 +g' <�. '�` , It $' kiz- r .Lg • eJ � >. L O s � C � O �� � � �. M S ` � � S M' � 4 Y' d N g� �: f s �.oc ly g fy "��' ^a.� > �a� � pa °��� ��I�C .�ru B•$. ar„ v • �IC' •,y. vq yfi_4.i��i y""N N�y +�Y� °y TNy� '3y+ �$.p�.+ �3. G rr S �� y�, +�� �S _M E yr, ®� M1 OW s O •'^ ■SS O�8 > /e • Nt�_lwiT Nr0 V �'p V -H O�S� iN is •�y R.. py +R'O M M s V /d.'• � aA V V > > e� C� v G ft• till O •4d � � a w 7_.v r. +•uc �Its a i O Maji Y Y. O Y SLAi .L Q � Nb 3 Alm • • r g NL r. I • y yeYa •.N� `_�aY Is a is A� -.s 4^ �$ �3•.. 'q r� I�YIL� ►•' �}�1� �Yib � N: �1�•'�i1 G U r y ^� vi= Zat i�Yj g" is y ®fir' •q� N N > 1t Ci•� E+ 1By� qF E y g y • p�Mi p'�1 • ^� an M 60 Y.0 N i M��L ~•�� � ri`Ny ��U L90Qwa..� � ~�^. NS,Cy3 �O/ .�._ « ^O `YaQ�11. {3y�'� YiS �Nys µY N.q�`u` {Y�� "Y"•~' ®•O �0 ■�s4 '�i.'C. ��-"■ YC� �LJ Arp Gy 4N 7.� `�Vp g���aV����LM .NY aS�ON �6Yn~N�a C's 'T V ^6 6�Y •9V ± + + *•�a. O�g�1��y$ 1 Lp�p �auOy S ^fI.Y :. •Y'V X17 Vr„ r� 9t. M O -; 4Mj 1N� O6> ~S C "Izao ;�9 "2 N41 a Z .ljj j�� ; Y. N O r W t7. Sv'ig na • ,k y bQ 1 ^ ° o p g i V:I f"ig;p -i — om Y0 AO � �A�4Ie ± ,y Yl!,u Cz� N � ,I'•`• `a T�Vj� O ta Ajl =a 2=3 Zk lull 11; q 1� ls+wsi +�17 �� �(wi ti NVN Z� �'^."���a y::� ��al�a Y � 'S �•YJp � C ` grYO� Y�4y ■N all 5y� 14.,ee+.:. iJ.g►B3 N.• x3E'y O g•yjY!}F w♦ ~S Y{1es•,„ CNt- C� ! Y. ~Y� N,4M V14�'•(Y. N�rg iv iiC Pt ^C Ul M+ Lp •, CS a? - 1 ♦I Y 4 '� a, 9.g w N .at .ws �� � ,�`j l�w. s� M k WE P' g ^! 1 A , SS9v wH YYV 1r �• q CCII 'Y qP 1. x6 T t0 V N NMw�E psi jIt —1 1.u4°i+ a+ :~ P M ew yQ'.YLY.'17¢!ll�iii $$� » /cy �i �i1i1 3 '! 4 -.2,3 ff.. yrri "Y`'b 2 L p tM L C N a. M V MO qY K sl y° w1�Y ,`e p N � 1w� •` ~ 14A t � it M'Y Y aasR •y�4 ni M +7 71 �~ xc �'�''� �a t�Y��� i.•7�,jjw'�» i rr _v Ica. a�..FV..�,� �ri u�swa 'yi ...0 ♦i �°« ^s x''r{ .-_r a.^ 1� .dam.. A's yy[x tix� �'rtr� as KYNW CA4� b LdN Y. a.M �C 47 6W A aNF7 � �rN� Wi Oia wM!•. a El ��-i 40IM51 Poor Quality �'gw ��Q erw�' xy �:. 3.'�.dN• iy..3c`a�"' uey�v. w B qq rµa ■ y !� �1 urI; 9 p al�.Y a��4 �� {�yyyY �wy■ O{ y{p e. too 1C f ` �a - ApM rM �'" C PwPN �Qi ins a.qar.N OdaM�i Y`'t �,8. p�+'.ed rL fly �LjMdi �.d IN � �6 OB��y DL - LY 4M 'a .t4 6Q�� SQ.�? b N49 � �' V ui ��`»�i�r� =4i ��1i •� � C.4� Y�Y� NT1a 9 4 14 14 o4l 3 .4 °a y N l � ^on c �a .Y.a 11 33 'r aL°a9rs Ya. sg a yy 3 {yby Viµ Ilk �14 V. Ise ez d N 1. Mw aWl° IITS pb� yp4�„N, i W @g # a 6yM �41pV MQ ice. "VU a � 'MY� ��.t. +� Yt Y'4.:$' tL; 149, yY yyl ICI OyL C? ya.M� YY ~�y Y�1 •C a_, j ~ xx. NO ?l■ �'+F Cf ��(1 j'�L, 0 yi' 17 p y 'ya lyV4 yY1 I � � Mq � M W M g N �•. ' s i 6� G a4 by Nee i�be Ly .� ,.,. N ,t i► a �t {yQ M 0 tit K u• 14.E � � o M pp A V�Y� V Mails^ v.� L Yt1. W��LY N�VNV=NCM M w •ly+`•:.L �Oe.rqq.Y .s Y�V y�j� Ma� L Fpp 3Ol_ a ■y ■p T YLy � � M R 2 aa.�}L 7wc. i[ ��o •wen ��w �� �O ! �� �}+ T V Q N (4 Lai is a ; �'• t :t isSl FIN 14 g4 3s s «a� ` °t 3Ar3a rw;� lag 42 3 moo° Y� *i $ xi Ypnt ,N�'� �. «iYl� gyp My e O 1iy y`� °{ NW� tl _y1r°� • C —e it i:R �Sry C V —w�. art6 lip �,yR+YM L k2 , C 'pL� p Y Y 5`���iiij " N • ■• � "erg h+ a`{ .—y. pp Y. bV 51 �by ° C� i� .fg.�xd -yy aWwt SY. am+!'.. • 3 It- M2 bk is I n! 4ixl .. Sir NNN as T_ RN �L N AIT � �°�! qL* -. 4p ®v�'M 'ppi L V4��u )� py�'.lgY,. • y Lai s ° 1i el 7a NO N!A�a Y�' ^. C"/5 f044 4r ; rw YlatGy ~ a VI V�w Wn Wuu ,76 Vti7 X "i. at0►4Y fit' ►-� K A d V !V eR R i' Cd 1'7 @ Vf v9 A . . I a I �e�< tl 0 o� $ • L a 0 GI°r e Y L o pp 4 :13 a° ry.� L ii Te_ CCdtt ^ C CYsr^ da M "p�A 6 w 4 0 L, C �YrW �p+ y CV• yy.�w • ° �rrY gaNr er °Yam 2 ° °¢CEO e l A N M r N W n is a ; �'• t :t isSl FIN 14 g4 3s s «a� ` °t 3Ar3a rw;� lag 42 3 moo° Y� *i $ xi Ypnt ,N�'� �. «iYl� gyp My e O 1iy y`� °{ NW� tl _y1r°� • C —e it i:R �Sry C V —w�. art6 lip �,yR+YM L k2 , C 'pL� p Y Y 5`���iiij " N • ■• � "erg h+ a`{ .—y. pp Y. bV 51 �by ° C� i� .fg.�xd -yy aWwt SY. am+!'.. • 3 It- M2 bk is I n! 4ixl .. Sir NNN as T_ RN �L N AIT � �°�! qL* -. 4p ®v�'M 'ppi L V4��u )� py�'.lgY,. • y Lai s ° 1i el 7a NO N!A�a Y�' ^. C"/5 f044 4r ; rw YlatGy ~ a VI V�w Wn Wuu ,76 Vti7 X "i. at0►4Y fit' ►-� K A d V !V eR R i' Cd 1'7 @ Vf v9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 14, 1988 1 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Cmanission FROM: Zrad Buller, City Planner BY: Tom Grahn, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: MODIFICATION TO CONDITIJNS OF APPROVAL AND TIME EXTENSION FUR CO ITTGNAL--USE PERMIT-8d-24 - FWLIXK ASSOCIATES 7' e ave opmen u a ence square MR conven sales and service center on 1.18 acres of 1-vd in the General Industrial /Rail Served District (Subaru 2), located at the northeast corner of 8th Street and Vineyard Avenue j APH 209 - 013 -15. TIME EXTENSION FOR VARIANCE 8606 - MATLOCK ASSOCIATES - A request to reduce the requires average 25 foot, an soaping on 8th Street ranging frGm 15 to 22 feet; to eliminate the I required 5 foot interior sideyard setback for a 12,040 square foot convenience sales end service -„rater on 1.18 acres of land in the General Industri ;mail Served District, located at the northeast corner of 8th Street and Vineyard Avenue - PAN: 209 - 013 -15. I. BACKGROUND: Conditional Use Permit 86 -24 and Variance 86 -06 were pr g na y approved can December 10, 1986, and are due to expire on December 10, 1943. according to the Development Cote, extensions for t Conditional Us( Permit and Variance may be gr,+Pted in t lve (12) month increments, not to exceed five !:5) years from the original date of approval. Therefore, the applicant may request two additional time extensions extending the Conditional Use Permit and Variar:e until December 10, 1391. The applicant is currently requesting a one year time Extension to expire on December 10, 1989. II. ANALYSIS-, Staff has analyzed the proposed time extension and has compared the proposal with t:e devolopment criteria outlined in the IndcsLrial Area Specific iPlan. Based on this review, the prudect meets the deve:opment standards of the Industrial Area Spec-Ific Plan for the General industrial District (Subarea 2). However, staff noted that the original Conditional Use Permit Resolution of Approual (86 -191) does not contain conditions consistent with the current policy directigns of the Planning ti� ITEM tl—fl __71 PLANNING Cl,WISSION STAFF REPORT CLIP 86-24 - MATLOCK ASSOCIATES December 14, 1988 Page 2 Commission regarding retail centers. Therefore, the following items should be included in the conditions of approval; 1. The fol® Ling design feat -es shall be provided in the trash enclosurw design to the satie-faction of thb 4ity Planner:; a. Architecturally integrated into the design of the ,hopping center. b. Separata = pedestrian access that does not require opening the main doors, to include self- closing pedestrian doer, c. Larga enough to accommodate two trash bins. ` d. Roll-up doors. ` e. Trash bins with counter- waighted lids. f. Architecturally treated overhvhd shade trellis. E" g. Chain link screen &I top tot trash- f� cia bl awing out of enclosure and designed to be hidden from view. ! 2. Trash collectior. shall occur between the hours of 9;00 a.m. and 10:00 P.M. only. 3. Graffiti shall be rived within 72 hours. 4. The entire site shall be kept free of trash a_Fsd debris at all times, and in no event shall trash and debris resin for more than twenty -four (24) hours. S. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with thO following standards, which shall be incorporated into the lease agreement of all tenants: a. Noise Levels. No commercial activities shall create any noise that would exveed an exterior noise ,-,vel of 602A during the hours of 10:00 p.m.. to 7 :00 a.m. old 66dBA during the hours of 7:00 a.^i. to 10 :00 p.m. b. Loading and Unloading. No person shall cause the loading; unloading, opening, closing, r_-7 handling of boxes, cMa.tes, containers, building ;m4terials, garbage cans, or similar objects between tha i`ours of 10:00 p.m. and 7;00 a.m., unless otherwise specif.�i4 her�tin in a manner which' would cause a noise disturbaWe to a residential area. J, PLANNM Ctomissrou STAFF REPORT CUP 86 -24 - KATLOCK ASSOCIATES Dezember 14, 1,988 Page 3 III. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been,advertii,ed in The Daily Report. newspaper as a public hearing and notices sent t. , -act properly owrers withiA 300 fhet of the project site - IY. RECu"htlENDATI : Std, V,KKk r,,�ends that the AlannIng C0QSSiort r ar exte6zi6 of time for Condit;ot�al 1,.e ?ermit 86-24 jran 86-06, 'through 'he adoption of the attached R fitted a �n BCB Attachments: Exhibit "A' - letter from Applicant Exhibit "B" - !..otation .gip Exhibit "C" - Si to Plan Resolution` f16. 86 -181 Resolution No, 86 -I87 Resolution No. 87-29 Resolution No. 87 -115 Flodification to Conditional Use Permit Resolution of Approval Variance Time Extension Resolution of Approval I I I gal 470 at (3D I=" pis i 01 V- to E] U IT F RAN,.-IO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION HIBITf .L. SCAM, WMI yJ F- jot If .4 x I 44 rj- -/ 0701 -02 012 14 -88 PC Aaenda 5 of 7 RESOLUTION NO. 86-181 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVINiG CONO17IONAL USE PERMIT NO, 86- 24,F(Si 12,000 S¢. FT. CONVENIENCE SALES AND SERVICE. CENTER LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF 8TH STREET & VINEYARD AVENVEIN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIALjRAIL SERVED DISTRICT - APN 201- 013 -15 WHEREAS, on the 1st day of December, 1986, a complete application was filed by Planning Group for review of the above- described proiect; and WHEREAS, on the 10th day of December, 1986, the Ranch Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described project. follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: I. -hat the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, 0e objectives of the Industrial Specific Plan and the purposes of the district in which the site is 2. That the proposed use, together with the ?- onditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental is the p4lblic health, safety, or welfare, or materially ° "laritr to properties or improvements in the vicinity, 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. t e project will not create impacts the enviroment aa7n _ at a Negative acarat anIsissuedan December0 1986, SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 86-24 is approved subject to e Moving conditions: XANMING DIVISION 1. Vine pockets and free standing potted plants shall be added along the arcade of the front elevation. Detailed design shall be included in the detailed landscape and irrigation ;.Tan and submitted for Planning Division review and approval prior to issuance of building permit. 2. Detailed design of the monumentation sign located 'at the corner of 8 *_h Street and Vineyard Avehue including mounding and annual color ground cover shall to submitted for City is Planner review and approval prior to issurce of 'building permit. Resol uti oT ;40. CUP 86 -24 - Planning group December 10. 1986 Page 2 3. Textured pavement such as brick pavers, exposed aggregate,, or a combination of both, shad be provided at the two main project entrances, and at building entrances. 4. Wood trellises should be of substantial size such as 3" x 8" to the satisfaction <.f the City Planner. 5. The approval of this Conditional Use Permit is for Convenience Sales and Services land use only. Other types of land uses are subject to Subarea 2 (General IndrAstrial Oisi;rist) of the Industrial Specific Plan. 6. All trees planted along 8th Street and Vineyard Avenue shall be minimum 24 -inch box size or larger. ENGIN €!'RING DIVISION A permit f m% A.T. 3 S.F. rail r,7ad shall be required for any grading within the right -of -way, 2. All .itrebt improvements, except sidewalks, shall be extended easterly along Sth Street from the property line to the concrete bridge over the Cucamonga Creek Channel to the satisfact'on of trei'ity Engineer. 3. Existing overhead utilities: a. Vineyard Avenue - an '1n -lieu fee as contribution to ne tut ure undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (electrical except for t.te 66 kv electrical) on the project site of the Vineyard Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be one-half the adopted unit amount times the length from the center of the A.T. 3 S.F. Railroad right -of -way to the center of 8th Street. b. 8th Street - existing overhead utilities Ml ecommun cation and electrical) on the project side of 8th Street shall be undergrounded along the entire project frontage and extending frcm the first pole east of the Cucamonga Creek Channel westerly to the first pole on the south side of 8th Street, prior t^ public improvement acceptance or occupahcy, whichever occurs First. Reimbursement of one, -half of the adopted cost oa undergrounding fro.* future development as it occurs on the opposite side of the street is Poi feasible because the property is presently de-el .d an4 in the City o Ontar o. SZ Ll a 0 Resolution No. CUR 86 -24 - Planning Group 'y December 10, 1986 Page 3 4. The sidewalk shall be extended along Vineyard Avenue to the railroad track as approved by A.T., b S.F. Railroad. 5. A permit from the City of Ontcr ;; ts_ required ,prior to any work within the right -of -way inctddi'ng the storm drain connection. APPROVED AND "DORTED THIS 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1886. PLAlli 7 OF RANCHO CUCAMONGR av a ar er, a r�ry ATTEST: rdo Uu4mr.-Imputy becreTary Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the ;Punning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution wat duty and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planping Comission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Comission held on the 100 day of December, 1986, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, CHITIEA, BARKER, TOLSTOY NOES: CWISSIONERS: WE ABSENT: COMMISSIOKERS: MOUE ,C f quality Ung i pMeKyeptllu p=6.�.� � w s N y y 6C7yi l.u~OO 44 ��Ti Y.N4 � -`•; 1,5 WEI Sri x � "' sus�_a6va��1_� �` a`JC • Y n�F � l'`Y ^" ^} �i:.Q � {i YY�! S.Yp N 9Y.� ^p'° p Y ,+� �S�L S Leggg `#'8 H „.°a• o�lh Qoa a yy ^V�f � ° g 6iEMSE D—Z ii g r: awl c •M• a$ `S7`.L 8a''d� Y � � M w / ♦ Yf ` f � N Y. 4F O u Y N w� G j 4 S N i LJ mi 11 n.L `. > n rz: qq 8 I - pig O ^«uit =, pyyy 8� O C N 1LSC311 •�� Ni a Jr a �1� �e���"'r�.. a YOM1• Y�_• � 6� `M� •i`�N ^�i y1RpV1 it's 2 ``v eei O1 ^� lyt +Nf � t . Si Sa_ y :• �t !292 Y R L ^^ w t LJ mi 11 origins, Poop tuNtj �^ 4 V•Ai— � ' s° c !:tl�t a y °a�G�M N `o.V ,i r " -a'i r2 i"�u1R1Ga C w a$a --p .i iynw pa Y {Q1 ��pppp}}3, 4Y�� Q.yY� NEw O L�V: f`4 RNMJG O U .CT D• C _ ffll yy S3 .•V. Yi _ 1 u�Q yi�1 »V NY OL QM �� W.Jw1 y1 �C` g4( l x yri Ng y �•-s. Sn i." +t ss �` M� °' «s .G^ 8 � i OL �Y O. L IR {L1M Y� 4+•N�yN E 4{q• Ya ��• ^Yq�^ bhp y VoNy. �p«W� � 'Mr•R �Y��'y�^� ry�+�i'y„ �b.� i y —Y��L •Q :Q �1.G� y.Ctl ` �'I OOs ��.Lw �OK C +�Y�p• yu � �KV3v {6{,�U '4s CN 9^ Ir Y Oyy <.Ad� .G Ca. NM C Vy VYQ •`Q a N9. Y .O 9^•g- rN..N yN -y VMFII�t y�tl0 1. •. w Q iy-. `. it Cam. `E M4M IL� Vc V �Y3 01w q r �w ,Y �p1 + A 4 y CNC S.•. tl CMa.^ ' -j 5pU NyyYy V�y ���AN ki6 Yf� �yaaV yyD k8a•' MOrpy ? 4yN 14 Y p lit �Ga. aF y.Nty E ^�p. 'arL's �bxy' uupC -0�C _ wuc N ^°Qxs'a'* - g'ppNqyAE��� y'y� 6a wc��Nz 44 4N 1R .. - yak. A A•�•`N�'w'w TYzAwf iN Lam am L`�p . S4uCvf Iw■ y r Oi y0p (y Y7 A q C`pE Qa a•Iiy C� Ytl`Q,� i{Jp yL�ygp � cq� °�Y t3s¢. 4y Oy� �aPN K itM4 KM NNa `i1MYV YI S'w MAO Yw�.=. W $•$ A`QQ( 1.1 4al u 8==C °�� �» v�T" pp.."y/e °{.•7�Y ia�$` air_! W.�.Mi V� by•i - :i ` 4�vr Jt 11 ^YAM 6 Ny 1 M Y Y� 8$ .t. 0. :� Y� �111111TTTTTT � `R4 �...•�,✓ MN 4�a� �` IRo S„ 1.1 Fig -. is n y a -tl 1�, V V N a1• C L tI-y. K �Nr +" - -I A Omg¢ �'a.°.: �1 Nr�� `� A 51� ��_� '°� w� awl Y �. �1�'.w� „w,•�p�+� -0��."Q„ r q N q r i.4 14 �a�• -r V+..+" Ctif.' -e C. tic aXe 4t~t•� .S . 0Y1 � wu M xi�q OV �g3j �Ea � �r {yt u �Y •y., � LC tC y ,�G • ^0.� 5 ��g wrtyy p MT! ';l�r �? 24 y N1 M A iAE'Sy w� ^�aj p QaOii 1. .a �iUp s i • y-� *s, Yi�=� NE Cy QlS +`M ^LEr.NyOA ^gyp q y.M1� ,' QC tll� OCa VtLfQ C Y' wM 'Vtl zt, Yw It '�''�'' I i ri a.a U W �a L ff olgifia f P.Q Y si bcj C L0.0Ce Nii,fv six's P. Y� U V�yy a.4r Ma`N$P O4Og4m.Yy C~'L C�~�C '�. ii$!!.. c nu • $ti ,,,, pwp,pN.q�o50 max a ywY nu 7�NY wy`'IRF ^�w44wjY4 ti`M gr3'� �YK`�wyq"A �Ygq��rTTN1rOynua+.lpK .�� N2 #.6 a� . ,'$.r. s$g1'~ e� Ir- ` , a w� w � Y M y9 3 VGQw iijwiy4 �w � �0 q 44T Y }k� ^NsieNl.yuw4 b..L6 awNN. N'V`t�,T. its: f N R4i$V ngN M>A Riwii yS�$ VGG _ '� _C �y resit N3y.$ N04D L wB�jR�ai a3V.�g. �~$. KN� KN .7N4 /+N.0 <N �r.-i y>; AiMiiY w 9w arm y 4� N4 Y 6 a.�M �L u � � 4wy b( ;-g 3 hL IWg N a� °53 � w� w M V 43; X 3a y; V R 'i N4 _C a y � O Y L Q SN�N 'E ^8� �'YY"gg H Y § N Y n 4 q ;p2 11 -I'M �y 2111'a <� JAI= Y USA yL x�pNy p52 :I K ! � w N • y Wi �,�inH4 N! v '. w V w Y R � 7R .? 31h �z ~ w -8 1yV� G Y wN A« L t]! w x.. x- rs •YY �qww Mz2 LV $ p • 6;S 222 sk _ N 3 y ,+�' µ �• v � r $ d � � O � L � � O N~ � ,� ,� � N Y =i 4 ` O y V Y4 u r j ►= p y M a R = O Y N +CW KV w.CMwy arm y 4� N4 Y 6 a.�M �L u � � 4wy b( ;-g 3 hL IWg N a� °53 � w� w M V 43; X 3a y; V R 'i N4 _C a y � O Y L Q SN�N 'E ^8� �'YY"gg H Y § N Y n 4 q ;p2 11 -I'M �y 2111'a <� JAI= Y USA yL x�pNy p52 :I K ! � w N • y Wi �,�inH4 N! v '. u a •n fi w = « s £aap �NOp 4 y yy�•- q y . W � v Y y � r ✓ Y N d A N r Y a i p W py� Y � ° ' 4 m 6 LGGp �Y 6 9 cN 9 � So w Y ^ a nd Y �a M � a� =X� V »« w A r�M rM Y a Original pooh N0. O +� O u y A y r. ` �gE -.8 4 4 ylu {�] Mtl � O q9�Y0� HU • O > i p 4iS3 y� L q YY r �.Y.S Y C «. H w.E-2 Cd •�yg M �y Or Fwp �i W C Z. 0 °.n2� 4 L O g pY U,-: 239.T. pY „iw� `g4yryY. _O,bE MN CYa ■. p1 »i� 1.l C �6Y jSt .�Y°��0. H. MM y C w a °y =76 r$. Sr DAY LO ` difg i �i ^. {�M��Nyw . «5ya ■y@ 4 d ��d =TO Y`S4 Neip. V ^M ±�BLrgYa i `YG r��r 7�ilrN rL, Fla a7 N t-�wL 6$ew.r. i'- •a{'•. �5 �n N. o. u1� 4 ss i �y Qa a F a Ja7 fa V a $. zg 4Y it 6 p Y .•4i C w 4 r u 4y Y YyT CL Y Y O N � 4Y yr i h ...r. U q � tlYrQ 6 411. IN w a�Yy �q•gY� n zk$� 4t > NNa Q�PSb » «S tC »TGn�w A3 #� L N p�ra i•^ a i as s $« ti a � pc6 tl oe la Y� �N 41 r > V Va oY a9 g, kBY Y A vyNy �g� Pa 70 �►�'.a. ?��rwS u .1c sur« V WY W 7 �Y�4 O + r 2' �r s �V J= wt?$l8 �g0Y C 4 'p-i wad. �yyY ff.� Y�N �Ngyyq` ,a ag� � R Ks j S�grw S�f,ao'si' i ::�oor %wfin ^ii n' tO. L p� � C� av a.g e xlilt st as Y "5�1• I Y•j 4I th � A I I ) 3 `g � ■ YY� r 6Md ��y� _ e _ i = Eau � ~� N " r� r`' Gr i1•o4. ~`oY -Y�v1 +.9 Co e�A M _.0 M� �� r g� ��0 ■��11� yOwyy` ^��.Ms p bw a � �y ■` �;3jN� 4s i;'v Yfvw �'� iG= ® v�vvi +iiG N PI • ` � vl � �1. 11 1 4 Y �• `O 4' WW _�f •N.Y. OCT ■ :s =' aaaa at__• s ".".$« .. s ja�gg � i , ! yr r %wfin ^ii n' tO. L p� � C� av a.g e xlilt st as Y "5�1• I Y•j 4I th � A I I ) 3 `g � ■ YY� r 6Md ��y� _ e _ i = Eau � ~� N " r� r`' Gr i1•o4. ~`oY -Y�v1 +.9 Co e�A M _.0 M� �� r g� ��0 ■��11� yOwyy` ^��.Ms p bw a � �y ■` �;3jN� 4s i;'v Yfvw �'� iG= ® v�vvi +iiG N PI • ` � vl � �1. 11 1 "tor 4Q a 3t r Sig It s e" "s s9 x� �r xe A 12M. 3i AT y L 33 S L; O1 iyy ]I! YY oy ■■ $g `p �i Ail Y� Y MO B N� !Y°. fiY �� aYaMi.vY 3 1.1� � Fii F�M.YW <s. H wr 44 2$ i w - wx R� C � C3I rr yy w tO W1 2 Lals « Y a� ry y.Q �r - SAM -e. pa o i i` w1 °4i M.gL; -i. ssr -1 1 1s OA 12 w b z. w�j H Xw j33w W . N � 1 I b� an — ° e v m �n b L a Hit th litY N e a a J. �� « � •� M Y V 2 b Y f•i�3 °w ffi !12 js u b. .5=q 5 • _S a 1V M � Y ..� R. k# '-: r Piz 31 a ''8 y� "1 : U :I A 3x i I 1 0 F:' 1 RESOLUTION NO. 86 -187 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCA14ONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 86 -06 TO REDUCE THE REQUIRFO AVERAGE 25 FOOT LANDSCAPING ON STH STREET FROM 15 FEET TO 22 FEET; TO ELIMINATE THE REQUIRED 5 FOOT INTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK,, FOR A 12,000 SQ. FT. CONVENIENCE SALES AND SERVICE CENTER ON 1.18 ACRES OF LAND IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL RAIL SERVED DISTRICT LOCATED.AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF 8TH STREET AND VINEYARD AVENUE - APH 201 -013- 15. WHEREAS, on the 1s* day of Dacember, 1986, an application was filed and accepted on the abo.vw- described project; and WHEREAS, on the l.,h day of Oecamber, 1986, the P ning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamon3a Planning Lommt sign has made the following find ngsc 1. That strict or literal, interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Develo went Code; in that, AML 1p without the Variance, the development of the site would not be feasible. 2. That there are exceptional or extraordinary cjrcumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the propeF -- that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district; in that, the size and shape of the site would cause difficulty in des %gning a p:,eject that cemplies with all City's applicable codes. 3. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the save district; fin that, without the Variance, the applicant could not develop the site. 4. That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district; in that, a similar size anC shape of parcel has been developed with a Variance. 5. That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. ECTION O6The Rancho C "camonga Planning Commission hereby approves 1lanant�- r3, KI 1'i AM,70 tEV D AD A AN OFTED THIS IO$h DAY OF December 1986. i PLANNING I TN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAKDNGA J BY: avid ar er, airman =i ATTEST: 4r Wur u y ecre kar" _y "_"_" I, Brad Ruller, DePuty Skcretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that,the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, p,:o;;ad,`and adopted by the Planning Commission of tFt 1 City of Rancho Cucamonga, rt a 'ragular meeting of the,')P anning Commission held J on the 10th day of December 1986 by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: CO VISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, MCNIEL, BARKER, CHITICA I NOES; C0141ISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COFMISSIONERS * NONE El RESOLUTION NO. 87 -29 P RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMO A PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING THE AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL. ilF- PERMIT NO. 86 -24 FOR 12.000 SQ. FT. CONVENIENCE SALES AND SERVICE CENTER TO INCLUDE BUSINFSS SUPPORT SERVIc�. LOCAiED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF & "iM STREET & VINEYARD AVENUE IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL /RAIL SERVED DISTRICT - APN 201 - 013 -15 WHEREAS, on the 25th day of February, 1987, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the abgve- described project, NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives .f the Development Code, and the purposes ,if toys distri -r, in which the site'is located. 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safet;r, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That t)e proposed use complies with each of the applicable ;roMfsions of the Devela;*ent Code. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environmen a—i n`Tc fiat a Negative Declaration was issued on December 10, 1987. SECTION 3: That Amendment to Conditional Use Permit No. 86 -24 is approved su5ject t o the fallowing conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. All conditions of approval contain in Resolution No. 86- 181 shall apply, except for Planning Division Condition No. 5, which is repealed. 2. The approval of this Conditional Use Permit is for Convenience Sales and Services and Business Support , Service land use only. Other types of land uses are subject to Subarea 2 (General Industrial District) of the Industrial Specific Plan. RESOi.UTION NBC. 87 -115 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCA14O'!OA PLANNING COMMISSION ._i APPROVING A HOOT (CATION OF h CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86 -24 FOR A 12,000 SQ. FT., CGOVF141ENCE SALES AND SERVICE CENTER LOCATED AT TK NORTHEAST CORNER OF STH STREET & VINEYARD AVENUE IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL/RAIL SERVED DISTRICT - APH 201- 013 -15 WHEREAS, on the 19th dsy of June, 1987, a request for a modification of -conditions was filed by Mr. D.H. Mays for the above stated project. WHEREAS, on the Stir day of July, 1 87, the Rancho Cucamonga Plaftaing Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described condition modification. follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning CrAnrrission resolves as SECTION 1: That Condition 3.b. under Engineering Division of Resolution ho. 88:181 shall be modified as follows: The word "east" in the fifth line shall be replaced with "west". APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8 DAY OF JULY, 1987. PLANNING COtM1ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA rry T. Mow, Chairman ATTEST: zzo���- ' a u �p , ear ,y "secretary I, Brad Buller, Deputy 'Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of July, 1987, by the following vote•to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK, BLAKESL£Y, CHITIEA, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS. NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ro A Resolution No. CUP 86,24 - Amendment Februnry'25, 1987 - Page 2 I i i APPROVED AND ADOPTED TSIS 25T14 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1987. PLANNING CttiAhlISSION, OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA rr c e ice hairman ATTEST: ra u, y" :ire ary l I, Brad Butler., Deputy Sercretary of the Planning Co+KSaission of the City ,:of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly add regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by 4jhe Planning .Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting c the Planning Commission held on the 26th da, -,of February, 1587, by the foilowine vote -to -wit: AYES: COMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL. 1;Ok TOY NOES: CONISSIONERS: NONE A€SENT: COIMMISSIONERS, BARKER ii c. RESOLUTION NO. 86 -181 -A A RESOLUTION OF THE K111NNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO IWCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO CI`IWIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 86 -24, THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 12,000 SQUARE FOOT CO "VENIENCE SALES AND SERVICE CENTER ON 1.18 .ACRES OF LAND , LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF 8TH STREET AND VINEYARD AVENUE, IN THE GENERA! INDUSTRIAL /RAIL SERVED DISTRICT (SUBAREA 2)3 AND FAING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF' - APN: 209- 013 -15. A. Recitals. (i) Matlock Ar aciates has filed an application foe the issuance of the Conditional Use Permye No. 86 -24 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional V,3e Permit request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On December 10, 1986, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 86 -181, approving the application for a 24 mont" pl, -,)d subject to specified conditions. (Ili) On November 4, 1988, the rpplicant filed a recruest for a 12 month time extension. (iv) On the 14th of December, 1988, the Planning Com iFsion of the City of Rancho Cura+r,onga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on tl;e application and concluded said hearing o.i that date. occurred. (v) '-1 legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have B. Resolutia, NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga of follows: 1. This Comissicn, hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence oresented to this Commission during the above referenced public hearing on bocember 14, 1988, i„cluding writ: )n and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application appl +es to property located at the northeast corner of 8th Street and Vineyard Avenue; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is \,cant, the property to the south of that site consists of single family homes, the property to the east is vacant, and the property to the crest is a restaurant and the Schcu Steel manufacturing plant. PLANNING COMMISSION r;ESOLUTIR ROB 86 -:81 -A CUP 86 -24 - MATLOCK ASSOCIATES December 14, 1988 Page 2 I 3. Based upon 4te substantial evidence presented to this Coonission during the above- referenced public hearing and uV) the specific findings of facts set fo -th in paragraph 1 and 7 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as 'allows: (a) That the .proposed use is in accord with the General Plan. the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes rnf th- ;district in which the site is loc4te4. (b) That the proposed user together with the conditions applicable therato, will not be detrimental to' the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to saroue.•ties or irrprovsments in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the appii'cbble provisions of the Development Code. 4. This Coraission found: and certii °led that the project hae been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality lot of 1970 and, further, this Commission issued a Negative Declaration oa December 10, t786. C. Based upon tha findings and conclusions stat forth in paragraph 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Ccma6ission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in `fte attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenre. Planning Division: (1) Approval shall expire on December 'SD, 1989, if Wf) ding permits are not issued, unless extended by the Planning Commission. (2) She approval of this Conditional Use Permft is for C61Rvenierse Sates and Services and Business Support Service land uses r7ly. Other types of land uses are subject to Subarea 2 (General ladustrial District) of the Ind,tstrial Specific Main. (3) Vine poc►:ets and fre4standing potted plans shall be added along the arcade of the front elevation. Detailed design shall be included in the detailed landscape and irrigation plan and submitted for Planning Division review and approval prior to issuance of building pemit. (4) Detailed design of the monurnentation sign lotatcd at the corner of 8th Street and Vineyard Avenue 'including mounding and annual color ground cover ,.7 �i1 be submitted for city Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permit. PLANNING C"ISSION RESOLUTION N0, 86 -181 -A CUP 8644 - MATLOCK ASSOCIATES' December 14, 1988 Page 3 (5) Textured pavement such as brick pavers, exposed aggregate, or _a combination of both, shall be provided at tie two main project entrances, and at building entrances. (6) Woad trellises should be of substantial size such as 3" x 8" to the satisfaction of the City Planner. (7) All trees planted along 8th Street and Vineyard Avenue shall be minimum 24 -inch box size or larger. (8) Prevision for the following design features shall be provided in the trash tnciosure to the satisfaction of the City Planner: a. Architdaturally integrated into the design of the shopping cep; ter. h Separate pedestrian access that doer not require opening the lain doors to include self -c osfng pedestrian door. c. Large enough to accommodate two trash bins. d. Roil -up doors„ e. Trash bins with counter weighted lids. f. Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis. 94 Caain link screezz on top to prevent trash from blowing out . of enclosure snd da4 fined to be hidden from view. (9) Trash collection shall occur between the hours of 4:00 a.m. and 10:00 P.M. only. (10) Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. (11) 'the entire site shall be kept free of trash znd debris at all times, and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than twenty -four ("k) hours. (13) All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards, which shall bo incorporated into the lease agreement of all tenants: a. Noise Levels. No commercial activities shall create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 60d8A during the. hours of 10 :00 p.m. to 7;00 a.m., unless otherwise specified hareln. to a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a ret,(dential area. i �t PLANNING COWISSION RESOLUTION NO. -86- 181+ -A CUP 86 -24 - MATLOCK ASSOCIATES December 14, 1988 Page 4 b. Loading and Unloading, No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or other handling of boxed, crates,, containers, building materials, garbage frets, or similar objects between the hours of 10:00 pm. i. ,,d 7:00 a.m., unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. Engineering Division: (1) A permit from the AT &SP railroad shall be obtained prior to any grading within the railroad right -of -way. (2) All street improvements, except sidewalks, sha-el be extended easterly along Stn Street from the property line to the concrete bridge over the Cucamonga Creek Channel to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. (3) Existing overhead utilities: - a. Vineyard Avenue - An in -lieu fee as contribution to the fu. uri� a unife grgi ending of the existing overhead utilities 1 (electrical, except for the 66 kv electrical) on the project side of Vineyard Avenue shall be paid tck the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be one -half the adopted unit amount times the length from , the center of the ATASF Railroad right -of -way to the center of 8th Street. b. 9th Street - Existing overhead utilities 'telecommunication a`o-9 elecViteil) on the project side of 8th Street shall be undergrounded along the g,,itire project frantage and extending from the first ;rte west of the Cucamonga Creek" Channel westerly to the first pole on the souti side of 8th Street, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. RAimbursement of one- half of the adopted cost of undergrounding from future development as it occurs on the opposite side of the street Is not feasible, because the property is presently developed and in the City of Ontario. (4) The sidewalk shall be extetide4 along vineyard Avenue to the railroad track as approved by the AT &SF Railroad. (5) A pewit from the City of Ontario is required prior to apy work within their right- of -way including the storm drain connection, i6? Sufficient dedicatioa shall -be provided -,Rt the northeast corn�,.'� of vineyard Avenue., 8th Street to acfbnmodatt the =-,` installation of a. City Entry Monument. c„ ,, ro PLANNING ts`MISSION RESQt,tTION NA. B6 -I8I -A CUP 86424 - :MATLOCK IdSOCIATE$ Decemaber 14, 12E6 Page s 6. The Secretary tp, )II Comi.ssion ,at7 certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THE 14TH' IAY OF DECEMBER, 1988, PLANNING C AISSION OF THE CITY' OF RANCHO cUCAWNGA BY ` arry T. Mu e , Wiran ATTEST; r` ac 8�.er, re ary r , k r, ;brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Sucaminga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, pessid, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the 0ty of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning 0,,A N,i"ion hold on `he 14th day of December, IM, by the following vote-to-Wit.- AYES: Cohn$6 "mERS: NOES. COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT; dOWISSIONERS: s �1 0,19inal Poorouality 0'y yrjoo ^H'Y • qM 6�yip 7e Asa pppy tY BID a ;�`� pt � S � Y a_� tb cc33Y y$ `l O y E ^M T ~' 4 T� Y tit y^ w �SµH4�{Nr� list 6 Y Y latf-11 1. AY In ea Yr. MyMy K Yer N C \ \A4w N 4 4 WeNall �wWz Y N� JIV Gam. so _a V V R Y�j spx4r y M� f, iyg3o� j 0: O +C �•• T6Y..Y� ••�rA 7 awe r i 4 ui 11 Lj 1 v, A a^i gw� L�r u yu° i ^ A iN a 9 o� l G= r s� III! U III! R O `Ki z N ^I o� V yCE gY� p- 1 & s" t O UN 21 q ° r � C I -r O w 000,41 GOOF' Quanty S o -Z: °�" 5 iu °4i1A P. .81 t *3 1Y Y ^ Y i6 A iL 5il°°$ 111=4 - j T.._.a3 riax B1111-4-2 25'QN��,2_1N all EY�a7i 10 M��u 10 !! rl ^I « i M -`3rb' i S ° ffi ": ga u N S Y N� yO N Yr� ���■ dg . Yffi�! S1 a its s z 8 O w Zia S o -Z: °�" 5 LLLL: 9 � �Nr a2wr. Ip3i] A a s ip X s9 ate TL N $ 3 5aj a g =i Y Lp a »ter �Y ^ r �'f- fib y 9 YYrffi ^s 3» ► «« IS W� N �. Pf I K MLLLM pi O M ! Ax + N 1 it �$F3 k Ys is 1 31 9 j6 If ;53 n� ffi it = �3 TL -tit yOV �i � f► y�,N '�! ®c '+i`S`ppP isYE Y 0 •Ti V dY d aw gCO � �a °iAU o�duo.°•�'nu�iO° �uyiYC � Lka ti8 a $ UzidUq. yS =,'sN Va by L e IC: �C. yq�r N up y'N'" YL YY _N Y�.e �'.U...O +p' .e.6��0ayi'��»w'� KIP ; O1 ,Vy Y � `ps 1'Y,N. ®� gyp. PAR y yggP` N N N �' 5 � 5 T '�.•�b "' � � Ell�.!�{.1A °.Q~pd L�{�y� � '�apw. `• Nyy�j. „, y�S® � W� � y �9 ^N$ NY iNnyS YNTi �~tl�JCY ■y� �qs �. T,1 8 * 1 1 � � .3. a1�p b R y +L Y M N, c` yb m 'qq Yt wyY s B Y Y ssy �yQ srs wy 'y��� Y y w Y � 4e�` p^ 16.pt Yr �MwiM•�w a1 ����� wil N L s 1 w L' s u 2w$�ANB" q°'a ao u ais b r�- �b, N:.$9oLiL��"'� �A} $ ■ ■g _t yw L }F!. y� tyY �[ � NO� LL Y�Ny6 a6M Q K4 Ff' �N5 ,{p' �Hil 1Y. �qy 1 r. GpY VI M KNr C. MOV `F.i <NV %a g$ Sq W4S .gy' M O o XTF 1$' 3 $ '!'S-ag' 6'g. �a s _ sstg all To 3 �• NN _ Qp Y C Z t 5 Hui !w$� Q Ltl y G w 3 0 b ��$ wyyt$M s 7V G N66 CI.rY.Q CCp +qpYO vp . �tY '^i� LAY+ SLR • Cf'L � : ®'i �Y 6 �t Y4�Y S I g gg�, sags 3 -11 Y S. 9yZ ai. ppl yw��{ y s1 i� OCY� LYTi 4 4�� �.0 4 . I� AMA �Yyy°q ■■ �� ■q ■ Y Y"YA c A 14-11 IN gal Ti E g 6 y � wt�J` <Ny ^7 7 O oism g� sb� ° 1- w :.. 3 3�� sE a4 °` -9�$gY N .rt ua qyss few wal�C ��V N6 Y3 y aw,l � !..A w 6YY.a. a.L S C i� Wn rW I W 0 'I, Or1ginai poor Quality 2g ° c'c: M a. a G�i • L4 Gam« �'' E.vm cozy� �r••}c(( Vy,E� ci za- it LH LN4 .—a Y. Sj V 0 12—as 4 o 'NNOYY$$ :�»e �y!�y0sp4� A.ryga o�4p44, � e� Q YtlN +w Cy +yY X69 F Y�y �L.O O. M'+YSY 4 yoY qe �3 `C l• ty1� t[ =Q � C M Y 4 4.��t yyA C $tl4 ='S� e'er' tl C t L M C 14n _A^. ° 4 ®•� V ^ w� q d Y M �' 0.. ;S4 qV C4 ^� aL L � V �.RgY �� —pJ yyy111i���� •CV �� 4 7�y NCO Nam G4Yt� � +� �j{ ��y` 49��W' ��G •� N 4C vqc..- Qya «p�p11 CcMa. aa, i'_= o^tl°I.gti aR `a�.�N a� ucg 10 Y �4Yi L OY1i �L�. _= y 99y L� T}4 �c z&� �L!MV SC Y u Qi ^s U1 -4W es a L'ag yy '6 1► Y y c�. Y —ONL 1 4 6 C V N V — . 6 • O O d � tl � Z 0+ 4 III O G °1 C Cy 10 C ' up �Y •p 4 O `@� u M^ '! 4 a , � �' d L? _ . r � L � N� Q � •� TO.— _g 1. ■e l� My E E13 X. H. p Niy• G • a O4 Y 1 V G v _ O —` •� N u'� M N i M 4 Q L q 4 og 19 C �ooY v 'i �y .+�a U .�.ge if0pyy� N N M �'— yyy`N£�YNNf 1*vgj. A. yQQN¢¢/N� . Al Y» y +Y YGC ilM V �Yp• L V:� :Id a »^ as eer art �YY� 8 s4yZ_ +i Y Lss 01— &14. `� G^ A Yp i — t i V . C 4- till V ■�—G -.Q Jl■ < F.N 'v f.6� COOV NS C Y.. Yif= I4Y aV N � Q' Y "O 1, Bee 3= 'goI's Cwt 3-.x = g, —'.X• r e$'s` 6w is py, L ® inY Ni :a gu a,a I'll's qN .1111 p- - ♦ Y v i y�. Mal a 1-4 ��N N.p� }nl WiGw Y JI�V� .Y� � ` 1qY•� r. L�rj is m 3� �O �y 3 i 8�Y a ` N v� W N� Z� s� K� y` x A� Is v 31 8" e 9� v L v Y C 4 Ygs _gs yc� � ;1L 03 •� O 1Y, Z M M t" • �rC �3. u u � K e� g�N� tA hs y y� o Y� all y it .gs `'118 a i �x a vS Eli 1, NN 38 yr Us y u G «Y� q g P! pp , qU r 4a ggL g M O w n '► y+ v " A _SI ill, 1- His vYgk ti Y 1 a a L Him ` L 1 r�wa R v� 1' 43 y Y O� i 4 Y �Q Yo y�N C M� 24 s M� %s- � g'� c mil tit f [�MI .cvt�� Yq 0 "91n111 Poor ouality q »z « ^ y1. � Vl 9jN — % W I C$r Yi y �. ., 6 is 13 �MY�� N 1+ 171 `0� NV r.4�'w� .iii iw unit. i. ti 7i �l QOM.' w F3M7 �C �1 of S h ¢ . • s » � w qr �ttY Y� r�Y cy� Yb n at Qt W3 4 ���jl� i r N .d �1 of S h ¢ . » � w qr �ttY Y� n a� K �u V i N a S h ¢ . » � w qr �ttY Y� a w v at N °& Y all of 'O M �M a LIS3 w •?lie: +"g S � Y s "� sw� :Y r I an A I Y 9 y NL 9 r q i Y �Op �Y 4t P IL SyO M ya jv s �I_ IN�3 IT M-s r e C a i ZY all of 'O t i w � Y arr U M M i= g V-5 Sir. LN w L a7 `! iY� YY aJ iM c �t SIC! YP R Nr. b yw A _N Y Y 1 \� t 1-1 E w � Y U M M i= g V-5 -5 D LN w L a7 `! iY� YY aJ iM • �t SIC! YP R Nr. Y _N 1 \� t 1-1 E 0 REST UT104 N0. A RESOLUTION OF PSE PLANNIKO COWISSICN OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE . TIKE EXTENSION FOR VARIANCE NO. 86 -065 TPE REQUEST TO REDUCE ,AUIRED 5 FOOT INTERIOR SIAM YARD} SETS, is t lE 2Z,bxa SQUARE FOOT COiiiiWOXE SALES AW SERVICE CENTER ON 1.18 ACRES OF LAND IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAVRAIL SERVED DISTRICT LOCATED AT Tff �07HEAST CORNEA OF STN STREET" AM VINEYARD AVENUE, AM MING rIMINGS IN' SUPPORT THEREOF A,PH. 209 - 013 -16. WHEREAS, a request has been filed' "fur a tip* extension for the above - described project, pursuant to Section 17.02.100. WHEREAS, tbe Planning Commission cinditionally approved the above- described Variance.. SECTION 1; The Rancho Cucamonga Plenning Cammission has made the following ""i"inffings; A. That prevailing economic conditions have caused a distressed market climate for developmeent of the project. C. That ce;"nt ec000mic, marketing, and inventory a conditions make it unreasonable to develop the protect at this time. C. That. strict enfoNament of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not be crxrsistent with the intent of the Development Cade. 0. That the granting of said time extension will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: The Rancher Cucamonga planning Commission hereby grants a time ext`.en rari`r`: Pro ect A,alIcant E iration Variance 86 -06 Hatl uk Associates December 10, 1981 .1u S 14 PL�INN »NO COWISSION RESOLUTION No. VA 65,06 - MATLOCK ASSOCIATES December 14, 19$8 Page 2 APt'OVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY Or" DEC94SER 1963. PLANNIN& Ctrl rssr,111 Of THE CITY OF RWHO CUMOWA BY: Tar ATTEST: �� -- ��': cre: _pry I, Brad Buller, %creta ;�f of the Plannin Cuca'aonga: do ftgreby certify that the reg irk i soTut on `G s Rancho regu7arlY Introduce ds passed, and adopted by tf[e Plaesol +�. City of Rancho Cacaxonga„ at a regular meeting g C nts�.�1 of the on the 14th dt�y of Decepber 1,986, by the following q}ptanring � fsa�M•.j.�7d 9 xQ, , to_wit: AYES: COWISSIOMERS,• "" NOES: CaWZSSIONERS: f ABSENT; CONNISSION£RS: 1 i _ MlY Or' RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Dece#t;er 14, 1988 ip I TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Cowlssion FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior :;ivlj Engineer BY: Barbara Koall , Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT ENVIRMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 11940 - su dfffs-i-cff-o-FE.96 acres of any n o arcV, -s T ie 'Industrial Park Arta, subrrea 7, locived at the southeast corner of White Oak and Elm Avenues (APN 206- 351 ^ &2l. I, PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of the Proposed Tentative Parcel p ass own on Exhibit "B" B. Parcel Size: The parcels range in size from 1700 sq. ft. to • K. TL. with a corn area of 83,922 sq. ft C. Existing Zoning: Industrial Park,- subarea 7 of the Industrial Arerea pec •c an D. Surrrunding land Use: North - Vacant, South - Industrial building (under Construction) East - Vacant { West - Vacant' f E. Surroundinca General Plan and Develoccwnt Code Designations: North Industrial Pans South Industrial Pajk East - Industrial `ark West - Industrial Pan`s - ITEM; -0 PLANNING' COWJSSION STAFF REPOU i TENTATIVE 1.1940 � WN:TE OAKY1LM, LTD. DECEMBER 14, 1988 PAGE F. Site Characteristics: The site contains vegatation conistitig most�Ty —o grap-W —vg's and grasses., II. ANALYSIS: This tentative parcel map create r cocoon Iiterest gill sub'd'ivision of 20 units and ,a common area. The developWt plans for this site are on tonight% Planning Commission Agenda for approval as DR 88-34. The public streets adjacent to the Parcel Map -area' already improved � with the exception of parkway improvements wh;ch are to be completed with the development of DR 88434, or approval of the final Parcel MAP. P l III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Thet_ _ -ii,ant completed Fart I of the Initial to . to con ucted a fiirvd4nvostigation and completed Part 11 of the Initial Study. adver'ie iarpacts upon the environment are anticipated as a_ resuid� of this protect. Therefore, issuance of Negative 4eclaration is appropriate. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Motices of Public Hearing, have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed t:r the Daily Report AOL Newspaper. Posting at the site has also beer. completed, V. RECOMMENDATION: It is' reco tided that. the Planning Co ission con0der a ' -hput "and elements. of the Tentative Parcel flap. If after such consideration, the Comaaission can recommeed approval, then the adoption of tha attached Resolution and issuance of e Negative rMclaration would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, Barrye R. Hanson Senior Civil Engineer BRH: rift: ly Attachments: Vicinity clap (Exhibit ",dl ") Tentative Map %Exhibit "81 Resolution and Recomended Condition of Approval x: it lGOfAtliCWw4�M7! uar;woruw:r! �a�nl� Corr "t a..C.0 CLCAMCAs► S� !r!aw9 carom. / gx7M � CrM CIM!® cowrtrx ( r' a" ft.AW-4 SITE "No"Cowm I H .111 IA:xm Z4 N TiTI&VIONITY MAP w AH Y fr aCa �x ..:.4M., .eu.r y / as' F ,a �y, •r i f• � 1 � MOATIVE PARCEL No. _ , ,0 IN THE CITY of MCNO CLCnmw�A. arec . Swotres�orr a sef� 3 or v..u� all 3 tflr w .[L(1:\''af0 !It OOfic a c ro.. „as ra rwaoity w o• amps ar fM' "A"Wrao comfy. start a Cts.r.aNl.. iL e ! it v('r�ws F 7 A1fFli1E_+` ��u 5 1 h i I w If J� Ii CITY O RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEMING DIMON wen r r r i L .. .-I'M s El RESO! lTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMCIGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APri(OVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 11940, LOCATED 'AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WHITE OAK AND EL14 AVERRIES, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. APR 208- 351 -Gc ' WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Nuwber 11940, submitted �v White Oak /Elm, Ltd., applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 20 parcels, the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of Califonlia, identified as APR 208- 351.52, located at thr southQast corner of White Oak and Elm Avenues and WHEREAS, on December 14, 1988, the Planning Comission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above - described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING ;"ISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the fali'5wi,,9 findings have been.made: � 1. That the map is consistent wftn the General Plan. j 2.. That the Improvement of the proposed subdivision � is consistert with the General Plan.. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the 1 proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivisian and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems ot; have adverse affects on abutting property* SECTION 2: This Ctissfta finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, furtilse. this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 11940 is hereby approved subject to tfre—attached Standard Conditions and the following Special Conditions: 1. The drive approaches shall be 35 feet in width at the right -of -way line and constructed per City Standard Drawing 306. Q -� PLANNING COh4irsm RESoLuTION No. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 11900 ; DECEMBER 14, 1988 PAGE 2 AWL i 2> A Good Faith.( effort shall be made to obtain an easement for a! .faint use driveway orr Else Apenv* from the adjacent !property to the east prior approval of the finaljMap. If this easeecnt is no ;obtained, the develops sham relocate the drive approach to the satisfaction of the City Engiieer and City Planner and provide a reciprocal access easement in favor of the property to the east. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS-14TH DAY OF DECEMBER 1985, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCNO:GOCAMOifiA BY: arry r. e , a raaan ATTEST: Brad Buller, Sicretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hareby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a reguiar meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of December, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS; NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 8 o' w a s 0 �Y w� v El WOW Poor Quatity c.BC O.` nI:CA d6 Q. v' • C S 3 a Y �•' Y V p rru yf ». z�.. g a e ,till PZ r ° 9:' 414 ^Vg N $ tt M y q fit sYT b M OO ` �♦ AH a�� a= a AL PY 's IS E =A » %. wY` 1-30 y it w 4 A M w Ny y i w s f $ $ A 4 p 4` r ° 9:' 414 ^Vg $ tt M M g� fit sYT b °1^ jy s a�� a= a AL Z.: 's IS E =A $ 9: %. wY` 1-30 y it w 4 A M w Ny y i w N ::Ito �I ICI I ICI I L W d Poor OwOltls L� °sue Y Y V L W �.t Y 4 C iY■ 9 G V � 6 Y PG �V_�B sg� N p Sao s�� s r o6"Ly Y V I I \1 _� "a �{ fi• SIC_ Ix Xx r s� a s: ss, F ;711 N a it wl N IR LI 1-2 0 --- -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Decemoer 14, 1988 TO: Chairman and,"ers of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner SUBJECT: PHASING PLAN FOR, CONDITIONAL. USE PERNIV 88 -12 - 'WESTERN PROPERTIES - A request recons er the Pjan n ng ow ss on s conditions regarding phasing for the Terra Vista Town Center, an integrar.ed community shopping center on 71 acres of land located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard - APR: 1077 - 421 -05, 06 and 13. BACKGROUND: On November 30, 1988, the Commission adopted its Resolution No, 8&236 approving a phasing plan for the Terra Vista Town Center sW >ject to specified conditions. Condition No. (e) (61 requires that building permits or Major-1 1 in reef adjoining westerly pldza be issued prior to On December 5, 1988, the developer of the site submitted a request for the Planning Commission to reconsider this condition. (Please see the attached letter). It is the developer's contention that this condition would create an unintentioned burden which could jeopardize the prior-t. ANALYSIS: It has always been the Comission's desire that the Terra Vista Town Center develop as a well planne4, well balanced, quality shopping center in the City's emerging downy .,,�ti.. In sta,ff's;-view, the intent of the condition was to assure that !W by probidin 'a tie between 1Kajor -land future, more upscale tenants. )(bite the_, fi' believes that portions of the condition could pose an uni'ntentia ,-problem, it believes avenues must be taken to help assure a higher quality image for the city. An olternative which may accomplish this objective could be the Commission's use of its policy of promoting art in public places. It is suggested that the phasing of the project be tied to three significant works of art to be placed in the three major plaza areas, as follows: \ o One at the Foothill /Haven corner treatment plaza, to be Installed prior to occupancy of Major-1. PLANNING COIW"EISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 88 -12 - WESTERN PROPERTIES December 14, 1988 Page 2 One in the Plaza area between Mfjars 1 and 2, to be installed prior to occupancy of MAjor -2. o One in the plaza adjacent to the movie theaters, to be installed prior to occupancy of the theaters. In staff's view, thi works of art will have a positi4 effect on setting the tone for future o velopa+ent with1�n the center. The artwork and its setting should provide a strong stat*ment reflective of the commitment to balance and quality by both the developer and the City. RECOMMENDATION, - � } It is e¢ that the CommissY6n consider this solution as ar alter iv to WqM t, on (e) $6 ?. Should the Commission concur, approvay , t" of a at shed nded resolution would be appropriate. spectf a ittedr, Brad Bull. ---� City Pla er BB :OK js Attachments: Letter from Applicant Resolution #o. 88 -236 Resolution No. 88-256A 11 11 Western Properties I1S6 Noah Mamu[e A�aw / p.G Hos 67Q 1 Uplaad, Cattebrcir 917SS / 714 94b 1514 UrcemI•er 5, 1988 Chairman and Members of the Planning Coamission City of Ra.icho Cucamonga 9320 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91,7ZO Ui IM 8eB1 t, Meawvana ae w QAAIA t3 Re: Request for reconsideration and amendment to Cor:ditions placed upon Phasing Plan for Conditional Use lietmit tip. f3U- 12 - Western Properties - Terra Vista Planned Community Dt r Chairman and Planning Commission Members: Several of the conditions the Planning Commission placed on its November 30, 19ES approval the Phasing Plan for Conditional Use Permit No. 88 -12 create an unintentional burden that seriously jeopardizes the shopping center project. As a result, W -stern Properties seeks the Assistance and cooperation of the Planning Commission in reconsidering and amending the ,r - .editions. Western Properties understands and appreciates the Planni,�t,. Commission's zealous effort+ ;towards the planning and phasing of the project, all geared towards the goal of making the project a long twin sutzess and credit to the community. As the Planning Commissioners are aware, the creatiots of a successful shopping center project is a sensitive process that, ,unong other things, is dependent upon landing majo.: stores to anchor the center. Tying down the first major anchor is often the most difficult step ar.d, once done, stimulates the momentums to close deals with additional anchors. Western Propertied has Men in negotiations with Target Stored to lie the anchor for the first major store for many months and has eibtained a corcmitmant Which is dependent upon Target achieving occupancy by October 1, 1989. To accomplish LhiS, construction must start by no later than January 6, 1989. Western Properties has, at the sarw time, been negotiating with several stores to b"ome the second and third anchors and believes it is close to vbtatn =ng crnvnitments; however, the negotiations have all been li1:1;cd to the aswtmption that Target wk uid ca- Anchor the center, Teittative Jeals +viLh other stores would disappear if the Target O -t.l falls through. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamongr December 5, 1989 Page 2 The problem created bri the Planning Ca minsion's phasing conditions is that it rsquires a precondition to be sat;sfied before the Target store will be i eued an occupancy permit, and Western Properties c,nno" guarantee that this precondition will be achieved by October 1, 1989. This precondition is., 6. Building permits for major 2 and wastorli plaza shall be issued prior to occupancy by major 1. Building permits for major 2 cannot, of course, be issued until the final plans for the design of the building are submitted and approved. Since negotiations with the second major have not boon finalized, Ta.�-gst cannot be guaranteed that Vestern Properties wili be in a position to obtain building permits for major 2 by October 1, 1989. As a result, the deal with Target is claw to unraveling, hlong with the negotiations wich the second anfl third anchors which are dependent upon Target's presence. The affect on the future viability of z shopping center on the site will, in our judgment, be catastrophic. Western Properties therefore needs the assistance of the Planning Commission to overcome these barriern %t this critics.: juncture in the planning of and negotiatior.�� ':or the center. Western Properties understands the Planning Commission's desire that the second major ba built as quickly as possible and is at least equally anxious to achieve this result, In fact, Western Properties is investing huge sums for infrastructure and facilities at the front *ad which would be only necessary'if the latter buildings are constructed. Moreover, as in many centers, the first major is a losing proposition for Western Properties from a monetary standpoint, and Western Properties' financial success is dependent upon the rapid Construction of these latter buildings aad stores. Since the hearing of last week, we have discussed the conditions with Dayton Hudson executives, They will not start construction of their odiiding unless they can be assured of occupancy on October 1, 1989. We should reiterate st this point that Western Properties is putting in the full im?rovements and infrastructure that would be necessary if the center wore constructed in one phase. Western Properties requests that the Planning Gomnis;%ion consider this as adequate assurance that it intends to complete the center in a timely fashion. (9-.9 D Chairman and Members of the Planning Coamiasion City of Rancho Cucamonga December s, 1988 = Page 3 This request for reconsideration and par Acularly sensitive stags of the amendment is due to the a and of the Target carinitment, Western Properties •IIs7ts the Piandin Comission to take thi,a siteP which i-t bell g�/*s ie easentiC in this long Process of working together toward,% a successful a�valoptn�txt; V*iY truly yours, WESTERN PROPERTIES R Lewis General Partner RML:RJD:blm dlrasl3a 1C RESOLUTION NO. 88 -235 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING THE PHASING PLAN FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89-1^? FOR TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER, AN INTEGRATED COiftN:TY SHOPPING CENTER -19 71 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN -AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD IN THE COMMUNITY COP'MERCIAL DISTRICT C: THE TERRA VISTA PWf 10 COMMUNITY, X% MAKING FIwDINGs IN SUPPORT ?HEREOF - APR- 1077.421 -05, Ob, AND 13.. ` A. Recitals. (1) On April 27, 1988, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 8875, thereby approving, subject to specified conditions, a community shopping center on 71 acres of land in the CN„ unit ',Commercial District of the Terra Vista Community Plan. A krue and complete apu of said Resolution is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and is incorporat� jy this reference. (ii) Pian*inV Division Condition No. 15 states nat "If any phasing is proposed, a phasing plan shall be subject to approval of the Planning Commission prior to issuance of building permits." (iii) Western Pro,yerties has filed an application for the 4pproval of a phasing plan for Co0iti.,nal ft Rtrmit -1o. 88_12 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hcreir.after ;n )is Resolution., tue subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as 'the application ". (iv) On the 30th of November, 1988, the planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cu "monga conducted a eel, noticed public hearing otn t' e application and c_ _ .: -ed said hearing on that 40se. occurred. (v) All legal prerequisites to the adoptjon of this Resolution havo B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of tree City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on Hovember 30, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as Follows: (a) The application applies to property located at tne northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard ,3th a street frontage Am of 12,700 feet and lot depth of t1,440 feet and is presently urOmproved; and PLANNING �J n(MISSION RESOLUTION NO. 88 -230 01" �J4 1 - TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER ' hJvesber 30, 1988 Page 2 (b) The property to the nortn of the subject site is vacant land, the property to the south of that site consists of an office complex, the arc —ety to the east is vacant Land and the prgperty to the west is an rt enteaGmenti.�ffIce cimple,x. 3. Based Ripon the substantial evidence presented to this �'ammission during the above- refakoenced public hearing and upon the --pacific findings of facts set fortrl it p #.ragraph 1 and 2 above, this CfA*Jssi,r,n hereby finds and concludes as Follows: (a) That the proposed Use is in accord with thv General Plan, the objectives of ehe Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed.., use, 'vogether with the conditions applicable ,therreto, will not be detrimental to the public health; safety, or welfare, or materially injurlous to properties or 'mpr6vements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use °complies with !,'rch+of the. applicable provisions of the Develops0t Code. 4. This Commission here5y finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance wits the California Environmental Quality Act of 197C. and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions se- i_,th in paragraph 1, 2, 3, and 4 abova, this Commission hereby approves the�_,,p,acation subect to each and every condition set forth below and incorpowated herein by this reference. (a) Perimeter landscaping including sidewalk, shall be provided along Haven Avenue, Town Center Drive, Foothill Boulevard and Spruce Avenue at the time of phase I improtements. (b) The building ;sad area for Major -2 and adjacent retail shops shall be t- .4porarily irrigated and plan *rd with groundcover• if the building permits For Major -2 and adjacent retail shops have iiot been issued prior to the accupr,cy of Major- 1 and adjacent retail shops. (c) All conditions of approval as contained in Resolutions 88 75 and 88 -118 shall app1N. (d) The existing traffic signal at H::ven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard shall be modified and upgraded. (n) Construction shall proceed in conformance with the ayproved phasing plan attached hereto as Exhibit "G , and incorporated by t„is reference, and described, in part, below: r PLANNING CCMMISSION RESOLUTIOM NO. 8&'236 CUP 88 -12 - TERRA VISTA TOWN CE12TER November 30, 1988 Pao3 (1) Phase I shall include completion of Haven/Foothill corner treatment, including the fountain and trellis, prior to 4ccupawy of Major -1, (2) 'Buildings "A-1 ", "A -2 ", and "B» shall be under substantial construction prier to gccupancy of Major-1. (3) Buildings "X" and "Y" shall be submitted for bjilding Permits Prior t* nctuPahzy of Major -1. (4) Buildings "S" and "P" and Pads 1, 2, and 3 shall be under substrAntiai construct-ion prior to occupancy if Major -2. (5)' Major -2 and the Westerly plaza shall be completed concurvently as Phase 11, (6) Building permits for Major -2 and westerly plaza shall be issued Prior ur ;cupancy of Major -l. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adop+ta« of this Resolution, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 30TH DAY of NOVEMBER, 1988. I PLANNING C" SION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCiMONGA f t BY; t ily of.- . X iel , a a i?Sn, AI I, Brad Buller, Sacretary of the Plaanie!g Commission of the t;ity of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby Certify that the f4rega,ng Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planr -ing Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 300, dk,' of Movember, 13" 3, by the following vote -to -wit AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, EMERICK. MCNIEL, TOLSTOY hues. COWISSIONERS: CHITIEA ABSENT COMMISSIONERS; HONE RESOLUTION NO. 88 -236A is A K£SOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING THE PHASING PLAN FOR CONDL,IONAL USE PERMIT 00. 88 -12 FOR TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER, AN INTEGRATED COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTER ON 71 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVFY4E A40 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS 'IN ',-4PPORT THEREOF APR: 11077421-05, 06, AND 13. A. Recitals. (i) On A;oril 27, 1988„ this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 88 -75, thereby approving, subject to specified conditions, a cocmfunity Shopping ,Enter on 71 acres of land in the Community Comme: -'ial District of the Terra Vista Cowmnity Plan. A true and complete copy of-�aid Resolution is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and is incorporated by this reference, 01) Planning Division Condition No. 16 states that "If any phasing is proposed, a phasing plan shall be tubjec� to approval of the Planning Commission prior to issuance of building permits." (iii) Western Properties has 'Filed an application for the approval of a phasing plan fa° Conditional Use Permit No. 88 -12 as described in the title of this ?,,solution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application ". (iv) Or. the 30th of Roves►ber, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing on the application and adopted its Resolution No. 88 -236 approving a phasing plan subject to specified conditions. (v) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. Mi W, THEREFORE, it is here €,; found. detemined and resolved by the P1an�ring Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Re_itals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 1. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Comission during the abc.:e- referenced public hearing on November 30, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard with a street frontage" of ±2,700 feet and lot depth of 11,440 fl:et and is presently unimproved; and PLAN NING- "COMISSiQk'RESOLUTION hi. 88 -236A CUP 8844 - TERRA VISTA TOWN DENTE Dece.%ber �.4, 1988 Page 2 (b) 'the property to the north of the subject site is vacant land, the property to the ',`�6uth of that site consists of an office complex, the property to the east fyr vacant land and the property to the west is an entertainment/office complex: 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Comeission during the above - referenced public hearing 'and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereb�'ftnds and concludes as follows: (a) That the prr�posed use ` #s in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Corte, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the p� vi is health, safety,, or welfare, or watetially injurious, to ,properties or improvetients in the vicinity. (c) that the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. This Cemission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and corsideeed in compliance with the Cali'ornia Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission issued a Negative Declaration on April 13, 1988„ S. Eased upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 3, and 4 dtove, this GomeListion hereby approves the application subject � to each and every condition set forth tieTo+: =and incorporated herein by this reference. b I (a) Perimeter landscapint - including sidewalk, shall be provided alung'Haven Avenue, Town Center Drive, Foothill Boulevard and Spruc�'Avenue at the time of Phase I improvements. (b) The building pad area for (Major -2 and adjacent retail shops shall be temporarily irrigated and planted with groundcover if the building perafts for !Major -2 and adjacent retail shops have not been issued prior to the occupancy of Major- 1 and adjacent retail shops. (c) All conditions of approval as coriained in Resolutions 88- 75 and 88- 118 shall.. (d) The existing traffic signal at Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard shall be nodifieu and upgraded., PLANNING C"ISSION RESOLUTION NO. 88 -236A CUP 88 -12 - TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER December 14, 1988 Page 3 (e) Construction shall proceed in conformance with the appr.:ved " phasing plan attached hereto as Exhibit "B", and incorporated by this reference, and described, in part, below: (1) Phase I shall include completion of Haven /Foothill corner treatment, including the fountain and trellis, prior to occupancy of Major -1. (2) Buildings "A -1 ", "A -2 ", and "B" shall be under substatitial construction prior to occupancy of Major- 11 (3) Building "X" arm "t" shall be submitted for building permits prior to occupancy of Major -1. (4) Buildings "S" and "P" and Pads 1, 2, and 3 shall be under substantial construction prior to occupancy of Major -2. (6) Major -2 and the westerly plaza shall be completed y concurrently as Phase II. (f) Three significant works of art shall be placed in the three major plaza areas, as follows: (1) One at the Foothill /Haven corner plaza, to be installed prior to occupancy of Major -1. (2) One in the plaza area between Majors 1 and 3, to be installed prior to occupancy of Major -2. (3) One in the plaza adjacent to the movie theaters, to be installed prior to occupancy of the theaters. 6. The Secretary to this Coemission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1988, PLANNING COMMISSIOU OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. We , CfiairMan ATTEST: Brad Buller, Sec re, ary PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, 88 -236A CUP 88 -12 - TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER December 14, 1988 Page 4 I Brad Buller Sss tar .-of the Planning Commission of the City of i� o re y 9 � � Cucamonga, do hereba,,, certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly ;dN regularly introduced, "�.oassod, -and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamo'njy. at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of Oecea+kier 1988,.by the fo`,,lowing vote -to -wit; AYES: CO►MIISSIONERS;�11_ NOES: C{MMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COWISSIONERS: ll` i�- f i I F y� RESOLUTION Ky. 88-75 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO COCAMONGA PLANNING- C"ISSIOI! APPROVING C9NDi7iONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88.12 FOR ION DEVELOPMENT OF AN INTEC,RATED COMM M, 88-12 KF CENTl��R CONSISTING OF FOUR MMOR RETAIL BUILDINGS TOTAIIM 319,000 SQUARE FEET, ADJOINING . MALL SHOPS TOTAkn%S 137,395 SQUARE SET, NINE SATELLITE RETAIL BUILDINGS TOTALING 43,550 SQUARE r.EET. TWO SATELLITE OFFICt. BUILDINGS TOTALING 27,3205 �QU,RRE FEET, FOUR RESTAURANT PADS, AND A 30.,000 SQUARE FOOT THEATER, CLWCEPTUAL TOTAL AL FOR A DESIGN CENYER CONSISTING OF TEN BUILDINGS TOTALING 195,550 SQUARE FEET, ALL ON 71 ACRES OF LAND IN THE CN K LOCA`'E(! OAT THE RTPEAST TERRA ER SOF HAVEN AVENIuS Ate FOOTHILL BOULEVARD Apm: 06, 13. 107 7- 421 -05, A. Recitals, (i) Western Properties hats filed an application for the: sauance of the Conditional Lose Permit Mo. 818-12 as described in the title, of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Reaoluticnv othe subject eon tidnat Use Pemit request is re €erred to as "the application ". dt (ii) On t'le 27th of April, IN", the Planning COWisSion of the City Of Rrncho Cucamonga conducted a duly notZ`ced public hearing on the tpplicaticn arid conclAided said Nearing on that date. (tie) All have occurred. legal, prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution B. Resoot{o, NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning COMM Ssion of ho City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1 This Cawaission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set for i th n the ReciUls, Part A, of Ws Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented -to this Commission during the above - referenced public written and oral staff re hearing on April 27, 5588, including ports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically fi-rds as follows- northeast corner )of Haven Avenutc and oothllieBoulevarl property a sttreot frontage he rl X2700 feet, and lot 6epth of t1e4Q feet and is presently unimproved, and t JeAL PLANNING COWISSf— RESOLUTION NO. 88 -75 RE: CUP U-12 - N..STERN Poop. April 27, 1988 Page 2 (b#\ The property to the north of the subject site is vacant land, the property to the south of that site consists of an office complex, the property to the west is an entertainment /office 1 Aplex, and the property 1 to the east is vacant land. 3. $aced upon the substantial evidence presented to this Comission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts seL forth in paragragh 1 and 2 above, this Comission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed project is ';onsistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and (b) That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the OQVelop�ent Code, the Terra Vista Community plan and the purposes of the district in which the site: is located;.,and (c) Thxt< the proposed use is in compliant-i with each of the applicable provisions id the 1 Development Cods and Terra vista Community Plan; and (d) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be ,conditions to the public health, safety, or welfare, or*nterially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.. 4. This ComwissioA hereby frhds and certifies that 1,e project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental g4uality Act of 1970 and, further, a Negative Declaration was issued on December 9, 1987 S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application sub"act to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached StLudard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Rlannine Division (1) Any transformers, service areas or trash enclosures located near the setbacks of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard shall only be considered when they are screened by using a combination of culls, berms and landscaping. PLANNING COMISS$'"" RESOLUTION NO. 88 -75 .- RE: CUP 88 -12 - %cSTER^" PROP, April 27, 1988 Page 3 (2) Proposed bus Shelters on t",aven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard shill e:tb&r be installed with the street improvament3 :'r some time as agreed to by the City Engin�err and City P1annEr., and SMIT be arc�;'iierturally compatible to the center. Final desigds -of the bus shelter shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to is;cance of building permit. (3) The courtyards on either side of Wor4.3 shall have similar design detaila and ca'atentas the retail count neat,, Maiors 1'4nd 2 allowing for changes in shape. of 0e actual courtyard area. Design do, is of these courtyards shall be included in the final drawings and reviewed i and approved by the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. (4) The roof ti o? 001 be substantially the s as the mater�al s', ,qle Submitted and installed in a randomly]Stacked manner. (5) An accent voussbir sisals be tsid on the entries to the mujor 000 Oilers. fine location and final material selection shall 1)e to the satisfaction of the Design Re'riew Cosmittee. SWISS should be P rov ed I! and approval prior to building persits. (f) Parking along maven Avenue and roothill Boulevard shalt be screened by the mess of foot b1rpts -,Id/or ld+u profile walls shrub ,IAA *rising. (7) Vise street tree theme along Foothill Boulevard shall ihc`u* altarnati:F drifts of Platanus MSwsa: and Pl.attanus aAff'olia and shall be indicated on the final Landscape plan which is "ie" -d and approve] by the Planning*D viStan prior to issuance or building permit,-. (8) The promenade W,4 be clearly distinguishable along its entire route through the center. Such items t: lighting, street furniture, sidewalk c6or I and pattern, landscape materials, ex. shall be consistent throughout the entire ;engo of the pro.eenade. (9) All Coesrtyard areas shall include the use of accent colors, including various potted plants subject to Design Review Committee approval. PLANNING rX MISSif" RESOLUvION W. 88.75 RE; CUT `4-12 - w,.o'dUH PROP. Ap P ge1427, 1988 (10) The pedestrian colonades at Building "X" and "Y" play an important role in the function*af the corner treatment of Haven and Foothill. Wherever feasible, such a colonade shall be incorporated around the two story portions of Buildings "X" and (11) Th( proposed 'four sit2? PLANING COMNISSr_ RESOLUTION N0. 88 -75 t" RE: CUP 88 -12 - ncSTERN PROP. April 27, 1988 Page 5 (19) Pr ')vision for security patrol of the shopomg center at least three times per evening,. seven Jays per week between! 0, hours of 10:00 P.M. and 6;00 A.M., by a Licensed private patrol operator. (20) Trash collection shall occur between the hours of 9 :00 A.M. and 10 :00 P.M. daily. (21) Graffiti shall be removed wiV.11n 73 hours. (22) The entire site shall be kept free of trash and debris at all trees, and in no event shall trash and debr *s rersain for wore than twent;- four (24) hours. (23) All oo.- ations and businasses shall be conductea `o comply with the following standards, wh, _`! shall -" incorporated into the Declaration of Restrictions and Grants of Easements which shall be recorded prior to any. lease agreement or lot sale agreements on -site: (a) Noise Levels. All commerciat activities shalt not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 6Od6A during the hours of 10 :00 P.M. to =7 :00 A.M. and 66d8A during the hours of 7:00 A.M. to 10 :00 P.M. (b) Loading and Um4ading - Restrictions apply only to Major 2- and- Major 4 and the Beall shops canMCting t3Ow, No person shall cause the ioadlng, mr.loading, opening, closing, or other handling of b;:,�, crates, containers, building saurials, garbage cans, or similar objects between the hours of 10 :00 P.M. and 7 :00 A.M., unless Otherwise specified herein, ir. a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a rssidentiai area. (24) The Cooditionai Use Permit shall be the governiq documan for the approval of Terra Vista Town Center. 0eelopcent Review 87 -39 shd;l be consid"ed null and void. mgintering Division t t) Ty ,,e existing overhead utilities f (telecommunication and electrical, except for he 66 KY electrical) on the project side of 1J11 riaven Avenue shall be undergroanded from the l,ll, PLANNING COMKISSi!_ RESCt.t!TION N0. U-75 r- DE: CUP 88 -12 - Wt=RN PROV April 27, 1988 Page 5 first pole on the south side of Foothill Boulevc •d to the first pole off-site north of Town Center Drive, prior to public ieprov~tnt a4ceptance ar occupancy, whichever «curs first, The development may request a reimbUlAsement agreement to cover one.hQlf the difference between the undergrounded cost of thet utilities (alectrical) or the project side Of the street minus those (celecomeunicaticns) previously tivioeustrae ndergrounded an the cppo%ite side (2) The following optians of the Master Plan of Stone Drains shall be constructed with the development: a) Ling 1 -1 from Doer Creek Channel to Spruce Street; b) Line 1 -2 from Foothill Boulevard to Town Center Drive; and :) Line 1 -3 from FcotMll Beuelev,6ed M Town Center Drive (3) Dratntge easements for the portions of the Master Plan of Storm Drains not located in public Nets shall be provided prior to the issuance of` building pereaits. (4) Traffic signals shall be constructed at the following locations with the ability to cenrdinate timings prior to occupancy of any buildings: a) Spruce Avenue and Foothill Boulevard; b) Spruce Avenue _Ad Town Center Driv,% c) Haven Avenue and Town Center gri4; and d) litin Entrance (opposit* At ;pen Street) and Foothill Boulevard, (5) The entire expen44 Of constructing whp_ traffic signal at the Min t0tranct (opposite Aspen Street) and Foothill Boulevard zhAll bit t1* responsibility of the developer, MA developer shall receive credit and 4 reimbursement from the SystM Development Fee if approved by the City Council for they :ether signals, (5) The fallowing streets shill be constructed full width' 'to include exurb am gutter an both sides PLANNING CONMISSIC¢'ES W'ON dO. 8€-75 RE: CUP 5A-12 - Lail PROP. April 27, 1988 Page 7 of the street.: Sidewalk, street lights and parkway landscaping beyond the project boundary may be dat'erred until development of ' the adjacent property: a) Spruce Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Elm Avenue; and b) Town Center Drive from HavRn Avenue to Spruce Avenue. (7) The appropriate lines of sight at all drivewalys shall be plotted on the landscape nlazis and the landscaping designed so t:at clear, unobstructed lines of sight are p,�sent to the satisfaction of the City engine and City P1anver. (Lt) all driveways shall be located as shown on the tr a ledheHaven the Avenue and Foothill adjacent to the site will be allowed only at Town Center Drive Aspen Street, Spruce Avenue, and the Maven /Fo4,.ail1 inlcrsection. All other driveways will be right -twn only. 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Zommission -wall r .rtify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED ANP ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF APRIL, 1988. PLANNING COMISSION OF /Hz T CITY Or RANCHO CUC.M ZUZ5" i R. u l ]"s� w1craualrMan ATTEST: A�� ad ►uller, UQ ur-y "crtrAry I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of th* Planning Coemlission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Comwission of the My of Rancho CucamongN, at a regular meoting of the Planning Coo aission held ea the 27-'A day of April, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSxONERS: EMERICK, CHITIEA, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: CtMitISSIONERS: tjONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY '- C� 1I ,t9 a N i 1 i i ..'Owl, �' AX a � �1 1 ��fllill�ll��llllll�I�� �, 23 s I r i r'~ I CITY OF RANChO CUCAMONGA ST "l - REPORT DATE: Dac(�ober 14, 1988 TD: chairman and Ked;ers of the Planning Corm fts, ^n FROM: Brad Buller, City Olanner BY: Otto k.Iduwil, Deputy City °leRmr SUBJECT: SAPPHIRE TRAIL This item was pontinued from the last o*ttinq in order for the Comaissaon to ha, i the bo iefit of infomation five thR Public Safety CL—missioa's review of the sight -of -line visibility i4,.ue as it relates to the trail fencing. At the timn of this writing, the Public Stftty Commission mee ng is yet to take place= it is scheduled far,Qece* er 0. Slafe Will p arr m sport undar r. separate, cover to �1 ap�te,�iz she Pop ic *; 'Ife Commission's actiou and furtker analyze thL- *_r r,4t ,,Adth n de -'Pn :ies for discusgion Wednesday night. Respect y tuheted_' Arad , €4sr City Ia;_ner - — CITY OF RANCHO C"CA v ONGA STAFF REPORT f DATE: December 14, 1988 TO: Chairman and I tiers of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Plartnar 1 SUBJECT: SAPPHIRE TRAIT. I I. BACKGROUND: A. Planninr, t...rission: On 1.'Nvember 9, 1988, on referral from the Zfty -U,-)unc , tWe—Plaaning :Commissiq:r conductad a hearing to receiv� itput on Community Trail improvements that were Installed op the west side of Sapphire Street, south of Banyan Street, At that time, the residents of the garble Avenue Celestite Avenue neighbornood vo9:ed their cb�eceions to the Community Trail improvements due to a perception, of I ade ate trail width and insufficient sight distance visibility. Tde , Planning stmission, after receiving all public testimony, recommenaee What the trail fencing be removed based primarily an what was perceived as lnxdequate sight distance visibility prWded at tt,a intersecti ,)ns of Marble -=d Wastite witil Sapphire. j FollrNing the Planning Commission greeting, a moo was recei�,ed Jfrm;i the Chairman requesting that the, Sapphire trail I inprovement issue be placed back on the Planning Commission agenda for consideration. Chairman McNiel fait that the Planning Commission had addressed the 1 -e without proper input from tht, Public Safety Commission. In that much of the Planning Cormission's discussion centered around the issue of sight distance visibility, Chairman McNiel felt that it would be appropriate t^ allow the experts of the R.tblic Safety Commission to make their recommendation on the :tight distance visibility issue,. After the Public Safety Commissiona meeting, the Planning Ccxnissig,, could then review the issue of the tt -ail width. B. Public Safety Commission: On December 8, 1988, the Public safety- Co ri s'-i s of Few-Wi d the sign± distance visibility issue surrounding the Sapphire trail improvements. Based an an inspection of t.,e site by its metbersr the Public Safety Commission deter :incd that, with the previous removal of seine fencing neaw the intersections, adequate sight distance Cx PLANNING CCW..1SSION STAFF REPORT RE: SAPPHIRE TRAIL December 14, 1988 Page 2 E visibility existed at the intersections of Sapphire and Celestite and Sapphire and Marble. The Commission, however, due to their unfamiliarity with equestrian issues, deferred the adequacy of the trail width to the Planning Commission for consideration. I1. ANAIYSIS,. A. Purpose of the Trail: With its adoption in 1981, the General an es a l i sheiI a ffi erarchy of trails to serve the needs of the Equestrian Overlay District. All new subdivisions within the City were required to provide local equestrian t. ils which could provide a link to the Community Trail networks. The 0 manity Trail network was then to provide a link to the Reyicnal Trail network serving the area. Within this subdivision, those vets located around the pe.imeter of the project have direct access t. a Local Equestrian Trail which connects directly to the Demens Channel Regional Trail,. Those lots located on the interior of the tract, however, have no direct access to the Dmens Trail and,, as a result, must access oato Sapphire and must either proceed north to the Owens Chan -4 Trail or proceed south to the Lucal Equestrian Trail at the ,.,rtharn portion of tract which connects to the Demens Chancel. B. Width of th• 'frail: D'iring the preparation of the trails se` ction ofi W— Wreral Plr,-, ;such time was spent by staff, the consultant, and the Alta L•,,a Riding Club pulling information together that was used as a hasis -"or the General Plan. In 1979, the Alta Loma Riding Oub suomitted a report outlining . various design conside- ations. The r:'port recognized that trail uidths, can vary greatly based on tr ?i1 locations, topography, and amount of 1-rail use. The report stated that, while a width of 12 to 13 feet is op'I'mun, the trail could be as narrow as 3 feet and still perrit safe passage (see Exhibit "D "). The particular trail in quest,or, is located at the beginning of the Equestrian Ov!. .,rlay 0 ,. %trict and serves as a link to other trails within thi northern portion of the City and to the Regional Trail network. It is not a point of destination for other equestrian users and there are no facilities or trails located south of this project., As a result, equestrian use of this segment of trail should be light. C. Capabilit ©f Users: luring the p5blic hearings for the vartcas 111ree n" T"gr; 'tfie compatibility of users on the trail has been a comion element. For the most part, stiff feels that the main concern centers around the equestrians users vet -.v.! pedestrians, cyclists, and other equestrian users. Fedestr. i. 11 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT RE: SAPPHIRE TRAIL December 14, 2988 Page 3 and cyclists will generally yield the right -of -way as necessary to other pedestrians and /or cyclists to allow safiC passage. Although equestrians try to follow the samQ guidilinqs, it is a little more difficult due to the size 6r the horses and the ahility to control the horses. Staff suggests' that the compatibility issue will be a minor concern for tho following reasons: 1. The lcw intensity of use on the trail anti cipated as previously mentioned. 2. The fencing does not creete a continuous "tuniie1" along the parkway. The first section of fence south of Marble is roug'Ily 80 feet long. The fence sections from Marble to Celestite are about 290 and 2g0 feet, respectively, with approximately a 25 -foot 'break between sectidis where the Local Equestrian Trail emits onto the Sapphire Community - Trail. The northern section of fence is approximately 200 feet in length.. The sectioning of the trail would allow users' to view the trail and determine if it was safe to continue through the next section or if they should wait until other users clear that section. 3. A low speed f travel is anticipated along the trail due to the number of interruptions in the trail. There are street intersections at each sad of the tract and a Local Trail access between the intersections that interrupt the flow and require careful negetiat,ion. It is anticipated that horses walking through the area would proceed between 3 and 5 miles per hour. D. Se -,-,ration of the Trail from the Street: While the residents of fhe '1Rar5le-Celes neighbornoo3 have V t prohihi s ic objection to the trail fencing because children cyclists, etc. from entering fiito the stract, the fence is actually designed in thus fashion. In most situations, the fence would prevent people aad nurses from running into the street and exposing thZelves to the vehicular traffic. The fence acts as a safety barrier betikeen the trail and the travel lanes. III. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Pianiiins Commission consider —afi - public input on the Sapphire Trail issue. After °onsidering all testimony, staff recommends that the planning Commission determine the trail width is adequate for this area and forwarl thae recommendation to the City Council. r PLANNING COWISSIGN STAFF REPORT RE: SAPPHIRE TRAIL, December 14, 1988 Pale 4 4Resly submi BB:SMko Attachments: !+xhib9t "A" - Memo From Chairman McNiel :, dribit , "Bp - November 9, 1988 Planning Cowission Minutes i�'.,xhibit °C" Public Safety Commission Staff Report ExIlibit `V - Trail Cross- Section 'From Alta L ma Riding � LAN* Report I i ! r 6 6 lu Uri' Y OF R AXG� 1i0 CUC AI bN(,,A MEMORANDUM DATE: November 1 7, 1988 - 10: Bra 4 Buller, CiV Planner FROM: Larry HOW, `chairman of the Planxting Commission' SUBJECT: SAPPHIRE TRAIL IiaPr OV NTS Pease, place a review `of the Community Trail improvement along the "St side of Sapphire Street south of Banyan: on the November 30 Planning Commis ,ion Agenda. I bet +,eve the Planning Commission may have reacted: to tt,e issue of the trail fencing without �praper.input from thg Public Safety Commission. Much of the Cosriis.sion's discussion war cente ;rd around the issue of sight -line visibility, and thatIs ar.issue that will he discussed by the expertt at the Devember & Public Safety Commission � Meeting.. Therefore, I balieve it 10oull-be appropriate to hold thn j Sapphire trail fencing matter ivat;il the P130tjili4 Commission s in receipt of information from the Pvtlic Wity C0*jssi' >)n. Please notify the ?representatives of the neighbgrrhoad that this matter � will be placed on the Nnxember 30 agenda, ana' i +t addition, tyre matter will be heard again by the'14 -Ini ning Commission 1% December 14, followwnr , #ha Public Safet,, Commfksion'Meeting.' LM:gs COUNCIL, REFERRALS I. SAPPHIRE TRAIL Scott Murphy, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Linda Valenti, 6278 Marble Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, stated she felt the staff report did not cover all the concerns of the residents. She asked why Sheriff Ingram's October 19 letter was not included. She stated she had heard at the October 19, 1988 City Council Meeting that Community Use Trails are to be used not a ;ily by equestrians, but also by joggers, pedestrians, bicyclists, and dirt bikers. Nis. Valenti then presented a short video depicting trail width measurements from 7'11" on up to 25`, some overhanging trees, and the view from a driver's _seat. Ms. Valenti felt two issues needed to be addressed - the width of the trail and safety from. impairment of visibility. She stated the trail in the area measured a maximum of W and was constrained on )ne side by a block wall and on the other by the fenmk. She felt the .,t newer trails are all 10', which was a safer width. She felt lowering the fence would help visibility, but would not make the trail widLe. She asked for removal of the fence for safety of vehicles and riders. Commissioner Chitiea asked if the videos were taken before ov after portions of the fence were removed. Ms. Val-r'. confirmed the videos were taken after the fence removal. MaryBeth Hagedon, 6283 Marble Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, stated only a small area was affected and felt the fence stould be removed. She stated that the easement,% on Celestite and Marble did not go anywhere. She stitted there was only one pony in the tract. She also said that along Demens Channel one side !sf the wash is posted for equestrian use and the other side is posted for pedestrians and bicyclists. She felt it wculd be proper to remov4, the trail fence and place a sidewalk in the area. Hearing no further testimony, the public hearing was closed. Chairman McNiel felt the vif.o depicted a bad situation. Commiss over Blakesley felt the posts presented a visibility barrier. Bill Silva, Deputy City Engineer, stated the fence was set back 18® from the curb. Commissioner Biakesley had strong concerns for safety, He stated this arld had light equestrian use, but Celt it was good to have a fence separating the trail from the %treat so horses coult not bolt into the street. He felt perhaps another type of fence ccald be used which would not block visibility. Chairman M.Niel felt it was important tv establish the fact that th(m area was going to be an equestrian coanttunity and it was necessary to (take provisions for trails. i r r Planning Commissi.,an Minutes -15- November 9, 1983 (= 7 Commissioner Chitiea stated that 10' fs an ideal width for passable distance but 8' is possible. One of the r,Ajor considerations for the fencing was the large amount of traffic on Sapphire, and th-3 desire! to prevent horses from bolting into the street. She did not see any way to widen the trail because €4 of the block wall on one side, but felt the overhanging trees could be € trimed. She started the ^Ity had decided to replace sidewalks with decomposed l granite trails within the entire equestrian area and provisions should be made !` for future equestrian use. She felt the 8' width, although not ideal, was adequate and the fence was important to keep horses and pedestrians off the street. Commissioner glakesley stated if a sidewalk was installed, it would farce equestrians onto Sapphire Street. i Commissioner Tolstoy ;hated that the width of this trail was set a long time ago. Since that tim,soat trails have been. designed wider with planter strips for visibility. He asked if it would be possible to use Demens Channel as an alternate trail. Co-naissioner llakesiey pointed out that to �zt from inside the tract, it would be necessary to Uke Sapphirf to get to Demens Channel. Chairman McNiel reopened tWpublic hearing. Ms. Valenti stated that the City had a ;opulation of 100,000 and not too many of those people were equestrians. She also feet that many riders are not very experienced and therefore, an 8' wide trail would not be wide pnoug "+r them to pass another horse. She asked if residents could be notified pr"".. to any future fencing being installed. 1-ommissioner Chitiea stated it wc0 d be easier to get residents' input ahead "lf time. Mr. Silva stated that the video depicted a vehicle exiting from the trail between Calestlte and Marble. The vehicle was not exiting from the street. Some posts and fencing ware remfived from: the Celestite and Sapphire corner and from the Marble a-�.s Sapphire comer. Ms. Valenti stated them was fmpiied use of vehicles into the trail because driveway curbing is cut ilto both ends of the trail. The trail is used by residents having work done in their back yards, Hearing no further testimony, the public hearing was closed. Brad Buller, City planner, felt the access cut tt, Sapphire could be closed off between Celestite alt Marble. Chairman MAW felt pedestrian, fencing could be installed to give access for pedestr=aol and equestrian use. Cou,ission_ Chitiea asked the reasoniotg for the a9" inset. Planning Commission Minutes -16- November 9, 198€ Mr. BW'er stated it � :�s for safaty reasons. Commissioner Chitiea asked if it would be possible to stripe a bike lane. Mr. Buller stated if a bike lane was striped on one side, it would have to be striped on both sides. He stated it would be possible to post signs ^.tating "bike route" on the street, which would possibly direct the bicyclists to the street, but it would not pry: 11t them from c# trail. He also stated it was a County approiied tract. Commissioner Chitiea felt that if it was dangerous for horses to pass withit.' the enclosed trail, it would be more dangerous for them to step into the street. Commissioner Tolstcy proposed removing the f;:nce and routing the parses to 0 viens Channel to exit the area. r. Commissioner Chitiea asked if there was access to Demens Channel at the southern edge. Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner, stated there was no equestrian trill from the back of Celestite and Marble to the Demeens Channel. Commissioner Chitiea stated she felt t,ja trail fe►►cing should definitely go from between Celestite and Marble north on dapphire. Commissioner Totstoy stated he would prefer not to have a fence. Commissioner Chitiea disagreed. She felt the fence was important. Commissioner Blakesley felt the fence would help to avoid traffit accidents caused by horses bolting into the street. Chairman McNiel stated he was inclined to agree that the only solution seemed to be removal of the fence. Commissioner Tolstoy fated he did not agree with switching to a sidewalk, but did feel the fence should be removed. Mr. Murphy stated blare were other sites in the City that will havo this same problem. Commissioner Blakesley felt fencing would work in many situations and it wound be a good idea for the Trails Committee to review proposel retrofitting prior to work being done. Chairman McNiel asked if a short split rail fence woul -4 work. Commissioner Blakesley fait other fencing materialSr shiauld be investigated. Planning Commission Minutes -17- November 9, 1988 f r;- Chailwn McNiel stated it was important tn keep grinds open to other fencing material E. Commissioner Chitiea state? the Trails Comwittee had O ready i-ecommended Fencing be installed north of Banyan on Sarphire. She felt it should he further reviewed before installation. Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, secopded by Ewer,, *, umnimou;,ly carried, to direct . staff to pursue n wvai of the' fence this section of 5afphi:e and irxi future have the Trails Committee 7njvA der other simil r saes before retrofitting. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS J. 8IKE TRAIL Cie VICi0R7k 11ANUE Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. Commissioner Chitiea stated the Trails Committee was (,"Ware of t1A trees cn either side of the street, and had not intended vemoving, the tr"S. They merely wanted to keel' bikes off the Are,:t frr safety reasons because i schools were located in the street, Chairman McNiel asked if City Council had adopted a tree removal and replacement ordinance. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated they were in the process of looking at the cost of maintaining windrows and City Council had riot taken any action as vet. Otto Kroutil, Deputy City Planner, stated the Zity -wide windrow issue was separate from this case. This involved a selective palm i;ree windrows that bad been designated as historic. He did not feel the tree removal and replacement ordinance would impact this area. Commissioner 9lakesley asked if the bike path could be placed behind the trees. Commissioner Tolstoy stated he felt vhe ont-a ;solution was to yoke it a Class III We route. Chairman 14c%iel opened the publi. nearing. Jim Frost stated that only the palm trees were an historic 1 ,,ndmark and he asked for clarification of the requirement that striped bike Lanes be on bo,ah sides of the street. Mr. Coleman stated that the palm trees wire slated ;.s historic and the eucalyptus windrow was slated for preservation. Planning Commission Hinutes November 9, 1988 n; C' QTY OF RANOFAO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DAVE: Derember 12, 1988 TO: Pity 4oulcil F.RuA Public Safety Commmission SUBJECT: REPORT ON SAPPHIRE BRIDLE TRAIL Pursuant to Council directions we have reviewed this 'trail fencing to determine whether it poses a traffic safety hazard due to inadequate sight -line visibility. The issue of horse and on-trail safety was referred to the`Planring Conti+ission for their evaluation. The Public Safety Commission has: 1. Taken public testimony from interested citizens inciu.,ing the complainants. 2. Personally inspected the site. 3. Read, reviewed, considered and discussed the staff resorts. CONCLUSION It is the Commission`s conclusion' that the Sapphire Street trail fencing dies not currently pose a traff'ic safety hazard to motorists or pedestrians. We further conclude that the recommendettions in the staff report are appropriate and the Commission adopted the same (see attached). RECONNENDATION That the area in question be monitored for the next 120 -180 days to determine if any actual problems develop. We do not recommend that any additional fencing be removed or altered at this time. Respectfully submitted, PUBLIC SAFETY COtMISSION CLYDE A. BOYD, Chairman CABJdja cc: Planning Commission A ±cached Ri C 11 Tose• Front By: Subject: 6,mRG —WM . — CITY ( )f RANCHO CCCA.Y ONG.A, STAFF REPORT Kovember 1, 1988 'r Chairman and Members of the Public Safety Co=ission , Russell H. Maguire, City Engine3r Paul A. Rougaau, �Mffio znineer Safety ComiderAtians in the Design of the Teltil on Sapphire Street South Ot Banyan sje"t III. Concern was M .sed by residents of tht Marble ilvens- Celestite A. I neighborhood ,tear 1 to n rsection visibility at Street of Sapphires t�r construction began on the trail fence in that area. This concern was expressed in a petition signed by about go residents of the area, early In October. After receipt of the petition, the affect on tiie �Wneeriitg staff conducted an inyesti3ation into the fence pleceaent and its Intersections. It Was found that the rmval of f; f 103 to 14t feet of use. This re+aoval .' ferrate at each street Provided foil visibility fo^ safe intersectiot; as acca1pl ishad idiately. ''verai residents of the area, however, appt_red at the City Cour. ii meeting Of October 19 and dsman :'ad the remval of the east of the fence, duo to remaining concerns of intersection ust and also concerns he fe the width of the trail. The City Co {acted referred the gattsr to the Pub1 sic Safety Ccrwwission and the Planning C�Mfssian. AM.YSIS: The fence reWVAl was bas;!i on stopping sig#tt lJe!ea calcul'atad ffft the maximum setbae.'t raa veh r by 'the Depart+wen, of Transportation. Tie actual satb:ctc of a vahirFa at the stpp li;!y e�i Sapphire on Marbles or CeT�stite venues is lase than the maximum. The stop lihas at these intersecttans are at the lcration which is standard throughout i:*, City and is used ' a provide opt1mW- visibility as well as adequate clearance for Padestriars. The Clamor width of the trail is nine fit. c is the openion of several area residents and riders that the ni" foo, width is inadequate for; two ;�U. sht; ens passing one another. The Standard Drawing for parkway tra` Is depending on Iwhettheerdlthe parkway is 1iaiQhltI2 feetowide�t�dlort tithe location of the block wall. pu 1 Noeembar 1, IM Pdge 2 AEML.."TION It is recommended thet the Commission confirm the stop line setbacks and fence r la va as being in conformance with accepted standards for traffic safety and that the trail width ,be discu�ed with respect to its dsafety, issio'�tri y public Input which �y be AVOlable at than sating. at e'intd iy msy feel it' appropriate for tho width ada�quacy to be knowledge u the Pxannirg COMission because, of the = necialized knowledge required for such o decision. Respectfa ] 14. tta d, i gttechment X0701 -0 012 -14 -88 PG Agenda o 6 of 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA ;load clou I • Ag Farm sl— Accal S3 Ctn." .1 . 4 -1 vp"'...t, 6 WhillA.&Y "A Whirl&.& St. CA Ma cl 14111.1d. 1 no S, t 1-1 • 3 1.977 FL13YMC Iron 11A Ila rm. SwAw .6 7 a< sar:nwooa m I lhoro hbrod ih, SUBJECT jai �3 rva.mls street EA LILL It NO. AR 11*34bud SunfW•A", F, A- 04 x * I F an st .1 114"ve. 4.0an 01 t j I �16 �aAll 1-44—n—m--Am— it 1, Ar n, at 81 �4 -1 ff ail 241 1? • SCUCAMONGA COMMERCE may. ia!lan..9ulca {10 1 CA 91770 987-1 12 6 17 w", A &SOL oq FMAR4 L II Ulf a, ol Z.r —10-M .1 6 20 CRY of rancho Cucamonga STANDARD DRAWING zl ^ j�( AL. /yTF�T '1°a DER ST[�S, 60Z�06$. rLAN VIEW � GxTwoeD G`�itRETtr �°— BN�rrn 18r;,rrt : E— rNtrewn t \ 14'NW %, �— �!o° Cur-5 OPIGrzlRE i7P,1IL �FPlbAc-M IZ' Mim. t¢ ME'r^L- 1Y PLATE. �IbLOGK KAI E�OWD TD 10' w-1 UPMCId.MT PICA AL =W" awy eb.+.m ulyc:i!Js s II i 5TH •Ths�a'+ l r ai ----? 4'Sp Gt�v/G� ( 007 i I ® -°�°`- Sft - r _ - : r_ PO U'`'t r- �h`�TIWGTEA OK 2iL 'sTN'tgARD STH Et., Mt:h7bE�9. HlhNaiy GKeArED MY WELDING- GRAS MMMSP- tJ TO A 3" 'STr - Hr7AFLL. vmu. Plh'E � �aL.GJ✓vE. wl CAP SuPr�r, �'tE.1z Z'�z11 uPR�H1: a CETAILS GATL WrrM `.,Ttp 'fHP %SLIGh1 COMMUNITY TRAIL 'r pa! •.r ►.e...asirs date VEHICLE GATE WITH SIDE ACCESS 1006 r . LyB nAByEC ENTI A41FUE giaQy '[A 10�' 1958 T. �F RALNNgPRnNz Y PLA 6 US pIESS G, p GgASELyNB PAR C Cfl°LiE 94.730 RANCHp CUB 7. 2gSg• • aclos 'R . 1'+EESa� :A air UEAE ;-Ott C�URt`a�lt'* p yON f$1C LSE AUfNUEaC� ggl N$ N CUYt C�NyyERS E fop LEg'£ E uy �gA� �G SEE 0 44N Sv LLaU,.UP �AE9L.E f.�E pE 4'3 O%I -Cori r K AS 2xE!f -To F° RESL�,ENTS �y�`� tn4 FETE LF ZQgpo N SiE UE SAC. iKA� SA 1�A�ASfl gR 3gC4 5 GNZfl • L SPSCLAL SPo Cam' • TxE CEt'1ANo SAfl'd E T %U N, C tgjo a FPSZ y�IV- SE AFfLC • A �'tE A IU8 REN Ny1"L S tdC� s @4�� s � CKLL84EN k . QUS% ZC 't�At CyLyLA C1ig+5 A =AL.L A R0 • SPECia Vu 'JIV A, ry° L'I LS OU t RdSnQ Y AVL ECUESN� p gg C Z-Aftl iRc � C 5 ALL dF FEES L 4 APPFto yyEt�1 SPE AEEA F � cult v.LE Y Of ZKE'5£ NCE EGA p®ECURE LEAVING OUR ®'9SSEUC �EfpRE AN 'Ls SyN U. LLhi p B H R s ES f 114 49 f fyCyALg UE ` AC'L CULCX C S�RUCaLON if U5 ASK S N EASC NE�'�S ®R;i+y OF E EYPECZ LN L Sy -tUAt ��R"t C�t=E 'LB C WE ARC PGLENlyA Zf3 �EEX S1gEI g� ®si, �,kv v S. A1.1• _ '[RAG E® ERE �UNC AE . PEE4AA of R CESSALeY A 916" Joe ZHE . A E P4,�yyNG nN SINCERE s VALEN�I .� INCA N IM X� C= =� C?CTDBER � �M" ./p pp AMENDMENT TO PETITION;IiOR,,'REMWAL OF FENCE ALONG SAPPXIR LOMA CHURCH BOU14DRY T` j SPAYON. E FROM ALMA IT IS THE OuERuELMINQ MAJORITY OF RESIDENTS WHO REQU;dR. FE(�CCE BE R`MQVEU CCONSERUATTIVE ESTIMATE DF Ct}S1OF RESIDENT, FEEL THAT SAID gRYDLE PATH UER 80k), CONSENS IS TOO NARROW FOR PEDISTRIANS h- ' -•. TO 'ASS SAFELY By EOUESMAN TRKFFIC..THERE IS NO PLACE :FOR A CHILD ON'A SICVCLE T SAFELY PA'43: ANY HORSE. CHILDREN Mf�taT CROSS `t0 THE OTHER 3EDE S�PFH� ^RJl IF RIDING A SICYCLE 9R SfGAT�HDAIiD, SAPPHIRE CANNOT BE SAFELY CRl7SS J® DUE TQ TRAFFIC WXICX CONTINUALLY EXCEEDS THE SPEED 9.tP7II`. e- REMOtIAL OF SAID`.FENCE C-0-ALLOW ENOUGH �SpACC FOR PEDI9TRYANS, AND RIDE R`3 Pffs# sEJCH' r4 WOU SAFELY, ALSO, IT IS TM OP NION of'szcNIRs or THIS PETITION THAT SAID ARPt� BE CEHENTEI7 FDR 3YLtEWALY►/ AND L .APING BE PROUIDBIS BY THE CITY. TREES TkAT WERE MOL`.E'II_, ANO REPLANTED IN TiiIS lRLXWAY ARE PLANTED MUCH r TO CLOSE TO EXISTINQ( $t,IQC1C ELLS. IN THE. VERY NEAR FUTURE THOSE f BLOCK WALLS WILL SE; UsNED DUE TO TREE € OOT 0R " I AS �REF'RESENTAT UE OF THE SIGNERS OF THIS PETIT JON I WILL CLOSELY FOLLOW CITY COUNCIL RLAC -Z -1 iN AND RECOMMENDATIt3�,- SINCERELY, it : Alft o LIND UALENTI -) I LESS►E AULETTi 9054 Citation Court _ Alta Lome, Cog 1701 DATE: 19 ttctob&r, I gas TO. fennfi� ! stout, t layer, City of Ramps �� 9141. Poor Ovaty City Council of Rsnct►a Cucamcsrp SUOJECT: Bridle Path Construction Ott Sapphire Street t1e,r Mr. Myer and J%mbera: On 12 tbl. t 9 ®B Merjj ffieth w =i long time aree fqueatrfenne to obaer�e the sub ssett belaa f to ' f eked me a r tduttt and opinion so i pi ementslidfntOWupontheasiit ptbotha ftwTuatfonsnafto give ter mss using the fecllity, t iced not been previot�ly errors e� tht# `.fo S-1epla straut dtwi hums Subsevutntllt, f dro+ra td the arm era shits data and re of tup eject ca l Seldom uoo Sapphire street. tva rroajor prabieme r�ordirap gaiety do wm obvious. . 04 bath drips l observed that at legit Autoaettemptingtaacr WAIFeStk+� f Maple cannot see traffic opprowhrrq from tha Hera3 E�q� e1t1wr Maple or tote street dust north of "epositfoned to tit edge of the bridle path, it ^ran h the traffic stop life hoybeon to a� any cars trsvelir� south on that steet. The for ,RO t, phi t multi tea fast onto pphire as tiw hill. Although traftjk vas light e 1 n t^9 this ft ton nee n �inu3�t tot a over V to an :urn onto Sapphire crom MaP1s, and Pisa snircutas k+asfeiy crook w lemon gtreat. . T1s bridle path ftasNia only MRS feint yids. This is not suff data room for horses NqW aafeiy under ail corxlfflora, ►{?Get aversga sired iftit mpaurIN theV -dth, t porfornw en experiment at my home vita an sarn hand) qusrterhorae in western egWpn{ant, f.e., a stendar4 w�ratarn o tnd bridle, with my S'4' adult deughtar riding tM animal. A standscd four foot ptfar renal fete baretly permitted of horse and rider. Extnopniet9tfg mat sine fad ha ont side s� poeQ and rail tiro the ocher, it pe #U alloar Aine �hwMy t�ith a Mgh Cemerr? block wall betwean harm if two aces at a Valk. Assuming ail ,idors are smolt and #11 kr{ ass are under control, this is txr! adegate. Unkrturrsiaty, people and horses arc i of alveys under coatral. 1 thin asked a friend, also a lonq time resident and horse ever, Sue Ar,%rt, to toot: at the area and give me her apiniart, Spews nose stockld st'tt* sefstg isstb s for birth autos end riders. $ha as unebte to MIS c a loft hand turn for ssbsrsl rnfnutoe off htapis at approaimetely 11 :30 AM today, and had to plans her car oft bt ewe feat onto UPPMre U sae southbound tr#Mc. 31nce traf!"scatrw3 were in place today due to the work, ve were both Concerned that southbound fr -a'ltc would be a�eA herder to $ae if the cosmic re not there. t t ;.earns to both Mrs. Arent -t orj myulf that the brfdls poth itself aFrrvu rq Purpose eruo is rarefy at t s imriders to thrtcommunity, we both toured the tract fralved erg sew no Wdeft Of equestrian use at this time. 0 � that particular AWL i Pega 1 a„ +re MVF.i.i1 i 9059 Cftation Court Alta Lame, Co 91701 Poor ouglity We Nth sorwI ttat lawsring tt* vmtt poste stteast ane fi t YOUt eAO d preDabt� 1►tip vtsitriiity �€ro�frot, ' but thotfLtheoeth:ratririA, axis, anrt�eddtiior +sllraMasontroiisd0fiftitelyr . PwAbleefour wag atop a4 the temoA- MtplelBapphireinidrWtfon Vouldollatret Rtracttottr ;at {SratttcfieryiR.asettand, oxpedfent mtAnor. t%vewr, the harravrmw or that motion of bridle path inakso sareiy for horaee orrd riders on issue that should bs oddreaeed as well. Both Mrs. Arelmr3 aril myself ors peat officers of the Alta Crafter Rid6q club arr.r hrvp -barn it: -1-461ved frith horse 311m manigenxa! and aafitty iseura. W* art hot emrow that both raaideala era the equwAaet comcnenity iamririon yood tarn* with fat* another and that nWq f4ra11 raaidi*b it tlar Odfncry Una here. `t have aaksd Mrs, them b deliver tWar read this latter to yell iaa M, buith' pravrriPari ms fr6rrQ yttendingfhisrfteatfatginperaan. Pletaefaalfinetvtallmaathomea lanytimerogoK:rgthf3is3ue. :il f�raliJ, Lcw�ie #u ;.Zti 987 -9418 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA DATE: December 1, 148, . MEMORANDUM FROM: Eugene Gilmore, Capta;a Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's station TO: Clyde Boyd, Chairman Public Safety Commi i ss on SUBJECT: BRIDLE PATH CONSTRUCTION ON SAPPHIRE On October I8, 2988, a construction safety assessment of a bridle Path under on Sapphire in Rancho Cucamonga was sutthitted. At that time it was felt that the location of the 4x4 fence posts created a visual that to vehicular traffic in the immediatea area, As you are aware, action was taken by the City, to alleviate that hazard by rLmoving a substantial nUmber of the 4x4 support Posts and fencing and setting the fence bark from the intersections of concern; SaPpphire and Marble and 5apphig-a and Celestite. The bridle trail fencing and intersections were recently re- examined by our Department. As a result of the fencing'being removed from the proximate area of the Intersections, there is no longer an obscurement to "vision that affects the safe movement of vehicle traffic. EI:las brdleph2 CITY (F RANCHO CUC-�N,10,NGA PLANNING DR'SM rr TITLF- ssgr/ EXHIPAT SCALL EIN Em R L F r r ? W � d poor QuatIty 9;� AV i OfIGMI Poor Queffity JI d r Jim & Vicki Jackson U" QUARTER HORSE tAN6 s ALTA WMA, CAMPORNM 93:04 Mr. Tarry McNiei Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga , 9330 Baseline t Rancho Gucamonga, CA November 25, 1988 REFERENCE: Sapphire Trail Improvement Opar Mr_ Moiliel I underste,d there has become quite a car.—OVersy over tho newly improved equestrian trail on Sapphire south of Banyan. I am writing, to give my full support of this improvement. As a long time city resident and horse owner, I applaud the city for its continuing efforts to improve and beautify Ache city and especially to provide safe areas for horse owners to enjoy their hobby. As I understowd 1L, the complaints from the local residents are primarily: 1. Saf ety due to narrow width of trail 2. Reduced visibility for d- .avers accessing. Sapphire due to fencing 3. Only one hors; in area I have both ridden and drove the areas in question. As a.: experienced horse woman, I arksure you the trail is wide enough to ride two abreast or past dy Another horse safely. As to the concern of children being on the trail simultaneoualy with horses, if som.sthing doee happen, it is much safer in my opinion .for all concerned to be bumped into the PVC rail fencing than. down a curb and into oncoming traffic. In reference to driver visibility, especially with the fence pulled back at the corners, there is awple visibility in both . directions to safely enter Sapphire., As tolithe complaint of only one horse currently on the area, that should not even be a point of argument. The area was designated horseproperty before any home was purchased. Even if there were no horses there currently, that does not preclude existing and future residents from owning horses. The trails are there not only for the benefit of that tr-lct but for the siatire nommunity. If a rami7,y does not want any part of equestrian activities, then they should buy one of the majority of homes not bs moified rs horse "o]ption property. 11 Jim and Vicki Jackson M x� I wanted to attend the November publio planning commission meeting in support of the issue but ail unable to due to a prior canflict. , I understand you are reverting a continuance at ,b,, t meeting until after tl a safety commisel-,%n further checks out e matter. I am in the process og prepar!Tq a video clearly showing safe usage of the trail for ri4ors and ptidestriana ryas well as driver visibility around the fencing. If such €s video would assist in presenting the case to retaining the fetinoe prior to the December publip_,mest as please let me know. As a final note Y also bows additional support from the horse community L ,�dinq a person who was highly misrepresented in one of the origina!,. letters of complaint. Thank you in advance for your time and support on this iazue. If " can be of acre amee.stance, please fuel free to call. Sincerely virid Ja/cksonn Trails Advisory �"s Wittee Ci x i E L-111 J n. •- -- CITE' OF RANCHO CU'CAMONGA STAFF REPORT � r ;t DATE: December 14, 1988 70: Chap' van and Members of the Planning Comission FROM: Brad Buller, City planner BY: Toni Grahn, Assistant planner SUBJECT: TRACT 13857 DESIGN REVIEW - N.J. . BROCK & SONS, INC. - 1he ed"sign` rev ew ar u ng a eva ens an e n e site plan for a previously approved Tentative Tract Map Consisting of 69 single family its on 18.48 acres of land in the Lori- Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), leeated at the Southwest corner of Banyan and Milliken Avenues » Am 201- 272.55. TRACT 13868 DESIGN REV EW - M.J. BROCK & Sol, Inc. - The �s art rev ert u u nq a eva ons a!t W TAR site Vtan for` a previously approved Tentative Tract Map Consisting of 61 single family hots on 17.40 acres of land. in the Low- MediuP Residential District (4-6 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of Banyan and Milliken Avenues APN: 201- 271-55. I. PROJECT AND SITE DE-W'RIPTION: A. Action Rtquoted: Approval of building elevations and plot plans. B. Project Density; Tract 13957 - 3.73 dwelling units per acre, Tract 13858 - 3,$1 dwelling units per acre. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: �^ 4 C—jjnt, F7ggtl oti o�"i" North South Single Family Residential (under construction) Victoria Planned Community, Lori - Medium Residential West - Single dwelling Residential; CearayndMannedeCommrr Commercial nest - Deer Creek Channel, Flood Control D. General Plan Designations: ro ect SIte - E5w- Meed'iuie Residential (4-8 ewelling units per acre) North - Flood Control South MOdiu+n -high Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) ITEM R -S J " I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT T 13897 DR b T 13858 DR - M.J. Frock b. Sons, Inc. December 14, 1988 Page ^c 11 East - tow Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) Hest - Flood Control E. Site Characteristics: The project site is currently vacant acd as been rough grade d.. The site is bounded to the north by Banyan Street, to the east by Milliken Avenue, and to the south by the proposed Route SO Freeway. II. ANALYSIS: A. Background: The design review for 'tracts 13857 and 13858 enco+�asses two of thrat phases of ghat was originally approved as Tentative Tract 13748. Phase 1, the design review for Tract 136589 has a total of 61 single family lots. P"se 1. the design review for Tract 13857, has a total of 69 single faariry lots. Phase III, the design review for Tract 1:3748, has a total of 182 single family lots which were approved by the Planning Coma, ision +in July 13, 19888 and November 30, 1988. B. General: The applicant is proposing a total of four floor p ens. fans one through three each have four elevations and range in size from 2,438 square feet to_3,069 square feet. The fourth floor plan has a total of 3,114 square feet with four elevations each having three variations; a three car garage, a three car garage with a bonus room and a fowr car garage. C. Design Review Committee: Tire building elevations and site plan ier'e rev ewe y ie ��ommittee (Blakesley, Buller, Chitiea) on November 17, 1988, The Committee recommended approval of the project subject to the following: 1. Materials used on the toff will by the front walk should be brick, masonry, or stucco, 2. The material which is used or the entry wall should also be used sc the front entrance as a foundation treasment which wraps around the corner on either side of the dining room window. 3. For those elevations in which there is no siding used, the exterior chimney "aerial should be stucco with a decorative accent band that matches the masonry treatment on the elevations. 4. A decorative opaque screen should be used on all wrought iron side yard gates. S. The developer, should install ony view fencing. (i PLANNING ttWSSTON STAFF REPORT T 13857 DR & T 13858 OR M.J. Brock b Sons, Inc. Deceisber .14, 1988 Page 3 6. The developer should provide a greater color selection on the garage doors to provide increased variety. III. FACTS FOR FINDIW,i. Tae project is consistent with the Oereral Plan an eeTapm A Code. The project will not be detrimental to the public health or safety, or cause nuisance or significant adverse enviroivental impacts. In addition, the proposed use and the site plan, together with the recomrendAd conditions of approval, are -,3n compliance with applicable provisions of the Development Code and City E•ta ^cards. IV.. REC ENDATION• Staff recommends that the Planning Commission ap ve �q ' gn review of building eletitions and plot plans fcr e 130 1. ip through the adoption of the attached Resolutions and conditions /' approval. R pectf i = *,ed, . f Brad Bull City PI ner BB:I.gevc Attacttients: Exhibit "A" - Site 'Utilization Exhibit "B" - Detai-.,-.Y Site Plan Exhibit "CO - Landscape Plan Exhibit "D" - Elevations Exhibit "E" - Floor plans Resolutt6n of Approval (Tract 13857) Resolution of Approval (Tract 13858) 6 lr ? J GIl r�aa: =an i 1' < <� . zi I i P Alli �� y�p All E ++year. For 0i A �i�xiitr'��tAs K' a .17 1� IJ t Ll olI rm -1-1 jj ill is 28 P -Vo Ij All 4 jj ill is 28 P �611 I�tn --k -Vo Ij 4 IS �611 I�tn --k !j , Mti `Sz ir Aft { � fir �e �" ' ✓• I V.t r 8 1 , Ell E M, i t� E� (d ! !s N flit ta It �� , +�" ��� .1 % `y - � •t'�' iii ►1 I �T I w 48 io ! it �.s_ti L it [I yf fir— � r a ®''M�„® �„ ®�,X ; ., � K• � fit IL s 4 of 0 E � L r r. 1 I I t i �I� LA id- 3 ki It �X ki It EE3 0 1 .. OF § � . }_ � � �� ol k=— � �\�/ \�� |� � / � \� 0 E -2 Em 11 alf w � 0 • C 3 -J! 11 E El &M �� "I27 It 1 i 11 V 't E� 0 12 Lag G U U r,. a r� �e .fin! l�1rF}k.•Q Jill w 8 it Pit 1 .r:..._ s • .N. �e .fin! l�1rF}k.•Q Jill w 8 it Pit 1 .r:..._ s • y..: `'� t.t� «» ■■ �\ ®tj■ C� ■N \�ƒ \� � : \:`�� �� \ \� � / ^ ^ ^ ` / \� � �� � }�� �� � 2' \k . �f :.. e: � ■ f ma = = Oki = = t i • N WIN .� ;,'fib Ei 1777 , . � �Ew�s& IU1l ;1181,; . � M i' ',t� r 11 NMI. s' 1 E �, ti rsrr �3 imw An I � Y1� Al Of I u i 1 .Lr f riapw.r�� �t a 'j �2,. P_J O O u •� sl- EgTH O ? Q U U Q U , ' df 5 OFc- --.2-/. j � 11 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCK0 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT .NO. 13857, A REVIEW OF BUILDING ELEVATIONS, AND DETAILtO SITE PLAN, LOCATED NORTH, OF HIGHLAND, WEST OF MILLIKEH AND SOUTH OF "BANYAN, IN THE LOW - MEDIUM RESIDENTIK DISTRICT, AND HAMS- FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. :LPN: 201 - 27155. A. Recitals. M M. J. Rro;k has filed an application for the Design Review of Tract No. 13857 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application". (ii) On December 14, 1988, the; Planning Comission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the i►pplication, viii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. i B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is herebi found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. Thia_ Comrissio n hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in tie Recital;js Part A of this Reso ut � l ton .re true and correct. 2.' Based upon substantial evidence presen#�:si to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting on December c4, 1989 \including .written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby. specifically finds as follows 1. That the proposed project is consistep:' with the objectives of the General Plan; and :� I' 2. That the proposed design is in accd�d with the objective of the Development Code and ,%he purposes of the district in which the site is loOted; and 3. That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applieabie provisions of the Development Code; and 4. That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detriment(,) to the public health, safety, or welfare, for materially injurious to properties or improveme�Jts in the vicinity. PLANNIK,ZOMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. Tract 13857 DR - M. J. Brock December 14, 1988 Page 2 3, Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in th6 attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this ?efere=4. (1) Materials used on the low wall by the front walk shalt be brick, mssonry, or stucco. (2) The material v6jeh is used on the entry wain shall also be used'* the front entrance as a foundation treatment whiO wraps around the cornea on either side of the dining room window. (3) For those elevations in -which there 1s no siding used, the ex'-erior chimney shall be stucco with a decorative accent band that matches the masonry treatment on the elevation. (4) Architectural detailing shall be provided %:n all side and rear elevations with an enhanced tr,4atmert. provided for those units drich back -on to 'Aiiliken Avenue, (5) Natural €ieldstor, shall be used on the elevations rather than a manufactured veneer. (6) The developer shall provide a greater color selection on the garage doors to provide increased variety, (7) A decorative opaque screen shall be :zsed on al, f wrought iron side yard gatea. (8) the developer shall install any rear yard view fencing (wrought iron an low wall), including, but not limited to lot 10 thru 25. (9) The wall design and 'landscape treatment along Milliken Avenue and Banyan Street shall be consistent with the treatment on the east side of Milliken Avenue. The wall design shall include a stucco coat with natural river rock pilasters with a cap provided on the rock pilasters. Ufa) Interior corner side yard walls shah be designed consistent with the Milliken Avenue wall. (11) The maximum drive width for a three car garage shall not exceed 24 Feet, and in any case shall not exceed 40 percent of the lot width, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.F, Tract 13857 OR - M. J,$ Brock u December 14, 1968 Page 3 (12) The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the potential Fourth Street Rock Crusher project in a standard fc•mat as detL,k0ned by the City Planner, prior to accc7ting a deposit on any property. 4�1 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPIOVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TWIDAY OF DF.CERER 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. WHiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad u er, secretary II r 1, Brad Bt.,ler, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City',�of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was laiy and regularly iCinnduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of December 1988, by the following vote -to -wit: C AYES: cOMMISSIONERS: ENOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: `: I al �. CE p�y.ur3 °o� »ry BpYy yye.t @Cd.�y "C ACxOY _ Rlw4Y $.. 2gC� wp X111 �Y. '✓� da L. _S zr i y ve -*1 °y35 v � ° : %.i��� �Yl a� ^�3 � YGrr. � :K .YQr Y �' ■Y Fillfir` -�d�� €r�� s Cwi 4a40 1fjC «il �, N »� ' P 1�V YiyY� M�4 ®tw. Y i.6 Y Y Y Y * Y c Y.. v �£ rbAj: is w a,.K H yr M {. vy yY 4. BO i:�+ »i �. ti y� J N T f N �j ,S- qb K. 11 {EE{yy ■�YyY �YS "'_ �O y�j �yY1w � 4iw _�Z M0 MwpY� g ii� LLby�gy Yj ills M ({ L�'�Yw YS M'S asY pp O« � YM1 ■ Mw «w O.O N - e � Iwo U11a, oleo zt ��Y�N�� 1 Yw_ Bk$ fA UL tub a w �0 •y S «Y�� YA iw :7 K « b ii i o iA o 2b %J w �bil Nw_i�� '.� DNS Y L iCA A�. m�� :�-� Y�wxx iY Mg Y: is A�Y L � r j %r tit .jy5q qY y N + kA �I N MS 'Y Ir � J.;] YSo 46 •ef YS ~� _Vw Yy;��� q \Y« ep� �Y �ti,���lq►...1d uypp���..�.Y� «�b eeN^�. Vv O.r�`O}� .ii L�VYR ■yy �9 a6� v « -Wr awc- y'yCST i�.-. !: �y K e6N /r'�RMMCI Kv�iAw� A 1 JS9ii qY ; „yy`N tVIY P e rt F+ar II as — -�) r N 1 b Y $ Y ^ill« a a 3s� =x }ja��'s Y gN y. if ,t� i • y.w 01 qg Y. ■ /y L N 5Y $ ,�� w «.^. i�f «,�6 a ag d �NtY yy C i e KyN . Np aY q N < 5pJM•i,'� $ 4 44 KIP- 4: ` 9A . N V ii $ , it 1 Y II _ q .' QeQ�_�� v 6 _� ~M$a1 ..YM o or 58N TS�a bz a $1 « 1P. ,S CN � L% « >� ° 1 Mr O .�E4xY.a1aI�_ L � ') °:� •'w�l �pp1 •wt ^ f� �6i ��s�sMfr.�YS V =+Ibo i�..L, �� . Jif ��'NM VyxaY ���' Tina ° ri'$1i. y «S �N��` YIV N is ,kC N « y�Id1 �X_ ill_ s 1a2 -ti + r aw .1 s rr tl Yi ` «s i.Y 5 ;� VY Ii dr C si Y _ N g #.. Wk Big �bN « °. j� i•►i N y��y a A -Ri f �1 r.♦ i� <V Yl ti0M oN� y , 0 W Ll Y^ Sw W Y Q YY.P1 f ` F. 31 Y Vi M -Y 49 M " �I p4 yc u yam! .kp ` BT1IC. 11! Y 13q- VN O '2 gQ, � ��s � V40 '�{i j� yx� ` via, p, M °:N V40 71M6y ♦p {yM F. y *04 -via `W,,cyc ��ppYY r� ve w g W 3 w Y YrS Se a -,Z ° 5=. 3�7} Zia � T � � ii p ■� 'tS YK Nil YL y� - tF Z- t x� o f <a. y � - i. Y Y y I4 'j. '4 yS y y Y y �Cp YU2 NY` yL i C N. yy�e 6 yq N L Y C N 1�Y1Y 1�m - N Y Y s x ; age. ash Fs �W„ "� yJ N YW � Qp9 rry � erg L 1 -SY wn . NpM• YGY Y qy �C y�C V Q •i Of aw+� • Yi�N4 � yy V 4 r ,S vi to 3' Gig « «- ^v�ai w� 4, J, 'r��l�P� yJt 4 yyYgY cL Y'e ii•E �i '^eC Y O^'` ` R `L yli_yy0 `- N N wy� `Oey 9�O ~NVc yMN - �Ca N a YNM aY�'.l ` ywpjy' .{a "'I,` E T _ �..'Lr i � • Lw{y� `O�a�N� yp�RA a �' Y O�, �'4. .�.10 • "Sy"^ N y 1 ipp C rq+ 1.2 M �w qwwg gEli. �w �uuN asy B ^` IGwe ^` N�yyu u g+ YY$ 1YY•si �i Qay FnNA UM « �iw .IL.�. e[.1�� " y�YS �MY L Nw i h _,s 3 _ s3$Yo 4rw �. k� is zs y M 11 I psi = V; I @ ISM �• ; r a , k8la,. sa _ill Iu 3» a Hui $� lint [a.. g33 zy Uft 3 P :: 3 E Sao F lit$g If 'Y. W V LI u 2 0 E QfOW Poor QuOty y°p�1 5{�1Y�� � wp�`3'�5' •y s" ", "s' �� "j'{;1« ,�51� NYLyyW LiJC QwGi O » �iy »w�' o w O .. '°yb •uL (ii ji3N �j' x0.('aa4 ` a b L G $ L 6 �'�0$ V 110. yr N = C y {�y �p� Y�q1 iq4��.� yNj L C VO � O +Y YSYaCMd �C C�'y yii 1iMZUL +t.YYy d` 0 TT}��� TpY ti OY XF Pa.N ,y■■ YJI>. V. I F. c�Cq Nµ. ¢a00111«4yy Yw �M1'. A AlirO1i.O r« 6. a� wp Op« +pN f L p g '754 11 g1 1 ♦Y e� MaYS��. YY1� Y »wYi �y� •R� CV VW1tlCbt ayL�N —u ye Y1 ) Y 6« J1 q ii'r� �L ggw .4+ � p�'yrg•1 yYY'e sLs 2 6 s� i� V« C� a. L r sY e? M 6 3 0 Y K A Yy� :c l' Y { u �1 R� 0 z` « N o N 01 iii 1 L O N E 4» E YYr 1 •S' M � g& � Y M 6Y� �tMt pp. h XI Y x 1 5( ® SY F N W q O Y y Y U O g' ew 21 £dl. :a 1-8 a q y Y a'�•_.Z q0 MS +b,s3 Z..L�gL as g`N'FgS x8 IJ�°� 3L9 g.,•4 • VIVO O V`~ ��T YY�°Y6 1yv41C! +W� 3''+N y� u��° `e[A�. 1• ih�YNa p M {•y� L N yVl� I eta e UE iz s uL ,!.} �Ib K'� Is��yy i�i r w y y� ��e �■ �•fCj6 y(ILI o .3 a Y 4C'e Py. 4.9Y O T �1. Y 1.Y rj 46 IZ...Nw Y 4 • 6� Ri CC pp�� �yA^+� 2i U CGei ado N�, N�''�,� � �,���y7� � � �:; �{{ �� �aq�' sup=' €� �� �/,_m■ .1 RCN e' -atl�. , .PiW i�w K1 �aa�M q mp N_C /t�Y�i+ MI V� lti tJ d� w1 /`J - c, i O ai N L i � L W +u .Mtl N YT ��fr •■c 6 ye iY 6J^ 1 Mrs A�y y�O YY Y $ o : .23 1 s O W reek C � � y� u��° `e[A�. 1• ih�YNa p M {•y� L N yVl� I eta e UE iz s uL ,!.} �Ib K'� Is��yy i�i r w y y� ��e �■ �•fCj6 y(ILI o .3 a Y 4C'e Py. 4.9Y O T �1. Y 1.Y rj 46 IZ...Nw Y 4 • 6� Ri CC pp�� �yA^+� 2i U CGei ado N�, N�''�,� � �,���y7� � � �:; �{{ �� �aq�' sup=' €� �� �/,_m■ .1 RCN e' -atl�. , .PiW i�w K1 �aa�M q mp N_C /t�Y�i+ MI V� lti tJ d� w1 /`J - c, U KI ' �. f RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COrMI'SSION OF THE CI'tY OF RANCRO CUCAIM6GA, CAL'IFO &NIA APPROVING DESIGN REYM FOR TRACT NO,, 13858, A REVIEW OF BRILUNG ELFVATIONS AND ' DETAILED SITE PLAN, LOCATED NORT6:' OF HIGHLAND, HEST OF MIrLLIKO, ANC SOUTH OF BANYAN, IN THE LOW - MEDIUM F£SIDENI1MI K' QICT, SAND MAXING' FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. - AM 201- ?71; -55. A. Recitals: M M.J. Brock has filed an app ?igntion for the Des';n Review of Tract No. 13858 as described in the titlf; a5' '4h:3 Resolution. Hereinafter the GubjeWi Desicn Review requtl�t is roferred :o as "the application ". iii? or, Dect Ober 14, 296ir, tha Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to considers the application. (iii) All 1ei3O ,ioerequisite, :to the adoption of this Resolution hive occurred. 8. Resolution'. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby fourd, datArmined and resol4ed by the Planning Commission of 'whe City of Rancho ucamong:* as follows: 1. This Commission hereby s,pecifi.caIly finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals p.rt. A, of this Resolttion are true and correct. 2. Based upon substAntial =vidente presented to this Commission d5riug the above- reerinced meets% ors December i4, 1988 incTudincr written and oral stafs reports, this z ►ission kareoy specifically finds as follows: That thL proposed project is consistent with the ublecMvex as the Cweral Plan; and 2. Th0 the pr'apased design is in accord with the objective of the Development rant Code and the pur, -ses of the district, i,: which the site is located; and 3. That the proposed design is in complian4e with each of the applicable provi PLANNING C"ISSMU R! SOUr'Flom No Tract 13868 - M.d, Brjock Dec.mber 14, 1988 Page 2 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph i and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set fortti below and in the attached Standard Condi4ions attached her?*o and incorporated herein by this reference. 1) materials used on the low wall by the front walk shall be brick, masonry, or stucco. (2) The material which is used on the evOl-V wall shall also be used at the front entrance -a fwindation treatment which wraps around the corner on either side of the dining room window. (3) For those elevations in which there is no siding utad, the exterior chimney shall be stucco with a decorative accent band that matches the masonry treatment on the elevation. !4) Architectural detailing shall be provided on all tide and rear elevations wWk an enhanced treatment pro.'" for those units which back -on to Milliken Avenue. (5) Natural fieldstone shall t>,-% used an the elevations rather -,.Nan a manufactured veneer. (6) The developer provide a greater color selection on Le garsge doors to provide increased variety. (7) A decorative opaque screen 'sioll be used on all wrought ',ron side yard gates. (6; The developer shall install any rear yard vim fencing (wrought it-on on low wall)., including, b;.t not limited to, lot 19 thru 6, lot 34 thru 41, and lot 59 thri4 5216. (9) The wall design anu landzcapa treatment along Milliken Avenue and Bark, /an Street shall be consistent with the treatment on the East side of Milliken Avenue. ne wail design shell include a stucco coat with natural river roof' pilasters with a cap provided on the rock pilasters. (10) Interior corner aide yard walls shall be designed consistent w th the taill ike:i Avenue wall (11) The maximum -drive width for a three car garage shall not. exceed 24 fec and in any case shall not exceed 40 percent of the lot width, i i PLANNING cowrssm RESCAXION NO, TrUt 13858 -- N.J'. Brock' 4 December 14, 1985 Page 3 (12) The developer shall pra ide each prospective buyer written notice of the potential Fourth Street Rock ; Crusher pro3ect in a standard format, as determined i by the City planner, prior to accepting a 4�posifi on j any property. i 4, 71te Secretary to this Comission shall eeriii Y to t,4e adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF DECEKBER, 1988, ; PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry e , a rman ATTEST: Brad Buller, secretary I, Bra:: Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commissjon of the City of. Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing,,` Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, pissed and. — adopted by the,,Aanrting Commissfon of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission hold on the 14th day of Dicember, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: tyt➢M rst IONERS: NOES: cGt issroN£RS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: i '1 I w 4! Y Q 7 V ti Y 6 a Ltlq�.�w �JaCV1.MY "�i Qwp 'q�� 1y 6 Y Y p nL".''$�g��R IY �9 R�iyyClr �✓y� G�D�'� YdM9 tlwNp '•!> M�Q u ti Mr, t 1. $ a a a I`r,` Imo' 4 Y �� ii L O (3N� i MM uaNYY # tCt � y4y Rys u1�'ul "'is e(syyq LUya qqep. MC�y KN6t C� � Oy OOprYi� .rp•.� Yy'�pYOCD,� Ya Y» N C± ywM L •! 4 �d iiiMIIIL C1: }SNP L6 wyi� i- •.�..a3'Tiw�'`:ir.. �8o�"�k s€yi aML". i5; `o.�$ �: a >>a F � i u V a d a X13 # 33u 1711 �yyY y yyyy R� V Y � y C Y Yy �A 6 e NN 111 C 4 V AMY M� .c $y Zg 4. !+0 'at 25 is ti !� A v., 3 1.9. i x� ME l �q a Aa Yy� t 4 1 12 sy4 yp I y1 { C Y~v 0 +0.r� �Y � p 1p�ClRw 7�A L�a G1 80V + Og.yO.T a Y C C Am IL 5 Y. M.� YC Yipp pO''~��yiY Cy p 'Lww r -" L Y d» 5O `.:+ MO$ 1--5a yo 4.0 Yi01 Y'q C >OG4 pq pp 8 03 ryry1, yL 3 C,qq� yItk 'C GGG V■ LL o sf `$'S nQNa �M$C 'rr"i�°$.". r�Y 3� �y�u^ "�'�C T � l�y�{•.: q Y. >CCRO. G1O yMO.�Nw N Q.CY I®i��J'�.. yy g. $�qY NCP ^_ge�A'� ayl.N YCw�L1 °0 Rt. yY� Yap p � w�L 4I.yr �M�tl � 2 OXF 9 � am IS CQ Y� Kin M ��� �w w^ pq S 30 w �& � u Y 1 w « +Y `U 2- r. 1 Was cv S■, s— w 419 Cad ►8 '�+ gig s: go Up R. LW ■ Y,i t-01 1 � ' .. w � q O _ �9 cu M NON R�V.� l�,Sni��N M aJ+ NCB =L$ 91129 yYJ1C'pVs -.Tel - NN O'�5 vN. iro a� 322t ' Ziw g WO Q. �r� «4 y Aov Otll'C�N� O�p � «� .a »g V it, b c A � VA YY w u^ s wsM O � M w �w w ^YY S .�M. jc4 Yea $� u it lit i= Ig_$ °� 51 "3 H ge NCY �YO �� YYY� ywy IS " V�uw }}fpp�MVr £ G 4 ~a 11 T N� y ^I p 1. .-V LS Mq LI S■, s— w 419 Cad ►8 '�+ gig s: go Up R. LW ■ Y,i t-01 1 � ' .. w � q O _ �9 cu M NON R�V.� l�,Sni��N M aJ+ NCB =L$ 91129 yYJ1C'pVs -.Tel - NN O'�5 vN. iro a� 322t ' Ziw g WO Q. �r� «4 y Aov Otll'C�N� O�p � «� .a »g V it, b c A � VA t O Z v w see` �o L•N s.� N L' NC y^ N..,A +r°.w�. +'- IT.`��. s N� (t�,� �aui. ��I` .Pi. w =N p �, � C.�S3+ati .'rC •�iN1op �q� °w ^ . C YRG J�•, Y� Y QN °' N O `0QQC `s9C 06 Ngl� +�� 0���cgN`00�114yM �� �p 0+�_C dr m7-2. ff.: °YgdN ���� �Q& �� ooh _��� '��x���ax� g�$s` ••• � ° Ig � Iii✓! d + °. '" M. � D Y -� y Ly^ �. a "°Y •mi$ YO�p l N 11 L NV YT•M °r°' Y $Y l � p��, �Y� �. "'N5 o gg _ q ^w Mw SSA i sYrY yam+ ^aogQ FRO, y L Rt Y Lttl !1► u""Y. ° Y 8' �g Y ° Y Y N YY4, � qQ lax! �p Y eY 6 • pNV� V a3■ c� d � G y W �vV�y Y ��J 1 R ow N� N fb $fag _ 1 <M � Z .j ~n� u qc� y: VV L yCO dp v ^s y eeY wJ N � N L M Nw L�M S� H A� ~i "i ti :J-'; l Q I W t N a w N w .el s �M Y < V M i C Y y Y N ° O w 9 :e 'yO y V > ne 8a w• M tpl MYY�Y T Y�a Y N�Yt' «up u �a y ° � Yl g; C 14 .3 I + ° N y Y M s $q•a Mn� N Q M s YYgg q` Q C C L a%$ M . y all >� Y 4 L Ya r M Y ! H Y�••P Y w < 6 }tea p�yy�Y .�BY« ya{ppppppge� ytle� �g8a �a1a_ ak�Y Vila y oohy »yR b. 14 Ip s gyyy>i ��ry » Y 2ew g `Opns y REAM gYN�Ci�.L � L 13 a M�¢y G {vt{wi IM O fY t Y K. iLLYiii N '1� � M y Ly t! M lip ���^ $ ��� � e�ny�� w: �P� ■■�•� _♦ qy 0 ti ^�� w8�4 Y6 K(: yiqL4p • QN «� ��D^ S� �VPY F♦.s �.e1 qip � L.w p `N «ryy YF 'V {0�4CT Y�t �. 4Q ■C ^� yY.0 (�}� Fgr♦ O Y iV N 4Yy YY C Y � i L�Z .1/{F. w M r Rip y�^pfa1' p �.Yr• E,Y. i. �4 y�• ..'r ��r•�' .tic Ryy4�rS l{.�.. u P$ y }y }P�KCS�y }J( Ns � „.Y��`Y1 � «Cr P�iYt �C{� 4��,wy�.i pY aC � w`[� S wiiiiii MM }� gyp, ygy$$ y R�¢Y[ «yL wq W ♦4i OM1.Y ,. at L32W` aZ' � C 4 Lw �NYw' " "� ^Yj 11 , a Y Y M91 �i 64. 14, , ti. Y)1Fiw � � uiu 'i �i�i6.pk RtQ H 'N IN � Y T Y �x K11.1 y j A� " "IT ill's a% YLs M Ne WR yy yy�N AV. « O Se AIM II�At�cc M v ;�V. �w��"`� 4 $��y ♦ V��yq' N�i9i. pun:: ` FyFyjyyy" a «�,iC y?R w� ^.RCS e! � � � Va ��r• � � °_`�� ��� y= pq vy A d r W A as V M 4 4 m; R V� e r Q� q ME M OVA- L • 3 �' Y.eC� E OR u Yy� Nwa C a�c ss 1 r V ))area Q� M O ^L �40 yya Rww. « °L NL xN %♦ ��. p0 7MW yfq a% }��D�'' L {� �a NJ�p a .. zc TL OL a N�� Mw■ °�L L w M w Y: :jig N I 8Z rig Is Z 2 nw "' iii = b C _` Y O rr Y V�M LT M Y D9V p @ y Y =y Mi P O Ls q iy Yfe• C �eO R GI yN W i ( a 2 � L V � L � ° � AI • i � � � X � � L MA Y.M W Y ^Nq y�. �. 6l????'g `L' A i. p�y� Yin NyYCj. KL gC��j6� Y,wT .2 -58 Ojai X3112 Hal � N ^lN _ M wa {qj� YV IA � y� ^� N Nh NLY Tr.w�Y N` (, Y�`. ax q� �tc�. q pNp� @7 Na Miis iLO. 4'rjg' T i �Sy 1�_�� P wp C i w > �L7oyo} y �iT �:�i `ii to P • �i 1�1.. _� N LLL� �Y$( ddd uy�� E 1 Y W oL Y r a y «� S SL Yy t 8.1 v Y 3 s Y°Y t N M L i 01 W b p I i 1 Ns y yY y «g • Mr Y Ja i �v �a8 8B � b y Y g n 01„ a Y Y Y Q11 1RC N ~I I l J CCl-- Z, �•�Y d �V Sj pt',/ Orklft#J Pwr pns OO y CY WW NR ,Al a 1-ccA N r� Y N �id sO p`o C C O CCC _ 2 iU tY yw V L g ILI 1 �L L8 A0. '�`�w �� Ya?b. �'ya u ®p �j!�Y yL^ iNt.Y Y ! M 6�f1��wOi �15y3 lisp tqW ! N � zz p,O. p 4 j t ? +N`.y W «YyO «� �~ a! CiY 'Qy^y■yS t y y N C L 1pC.+ y�y`C�O. e�p zt �`6"•. X JC LSTe � F ` L�YtYL ACHE NO a ". �'.f id ►w "q{. WaLiN4L'Y oven i M O \ ■ s q' `�V� i I 1 I l E 1 Y W oL Y r a y «� S SL Yy t 8.1 v Y 3 s Y°Y t N M L i 01 W b p I i 1 Ns y yY y «g • Mr Y Ja i �v �a8 8B � b y Y g n 01„ a Y Y Y Q11 1RC N ~I I l J CCl-- Z, �•�Y d �V Sj pt',/ r� iag _rig L g ILI 1 �L L8 A0. '�`�w It-It r k .1 ®p �j!�Y yL^ iNt.Y Y ! M 6�f1��wOi �15y3 lisp tqW ! N � Nr Y v W 9 r w f I ME Yr °Y Ya 33�s V � y ■¢ OcY q ^O a Y 3� igN a Y 2 rN Y Y Y • Y C Y MiY O �? e-s .9 O Q L Y $� r 3° Y +1. U■na �•w�N WS 4W I f I sr� s s z $.� 6 w i a r Us r of M u+ Z S gilt U Y yYS �` N �•�°i.�. � i j`M r w a w M 4 N L a c-1 0 OffY• j6 L eSr Fi3 i r J— yY C 'J K M Y� �� 1 g O N' R °g w.Y u. L dr � OM° Z 3 »!�S M Y X014 r w f I ME Yr °Y Ya 33�s V � y ■¢ OcY q ^O a Y 3� igN a Y 2 rN Y Y Y • Y C Y MiY O �? e-s .9 O Q L Y $� r 3° Y +1. U■na �•w�N WS 4W I f I sr� s s z $.� 6 w i a r Us r of M u+ Z S gilt U Y yYS �` N �•�°i.�. � i j`M r w a w M 4 N L a c-1 0 I 1 M J� •t `Y eSr Fi3 i ° »a it s O N' R YYNN °ur Y AMY 'hiw V� M O JJ N'r M r.� � a � ��i�i 2816 F I 1 CITY OF RANCg3O CUCAIAONGA STAFF REPORT -N, DATE. December 14, 1988 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Chris Westman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL .,ASSESSMENT AJ O DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88-37 Ui.`6ONA(:�; ATNERS - e eve rpmen of a two- story 26,265 sqjare foot o ice building on 7.09 acres of land in the haven Avenue Overlay District (Subarea 6) located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Acacia Street - APR: 209 - 401 -01. I. PROJECT A!40 SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Ra- oested: Approval' of architectural elevat'Aas ar!d e p an. B. Surrounding Land Use and toning:_ 10 vacant, — railroad tracks; Industrial Park District (Subarea 6), Haven Overlay District south - Office building, Industrial Krk District (Subarea 6) , Haven Overlay District East WarehouseldIstribution builkMj ; Industrial Park District !Subarea 6) West - Vacanti -Industrial -Park District (Subarea 6), Haven, Nerlk, District C. Genera. Plan Designations: ro ect Slt industrial Fdrk, Haven Avenue Overlay District North - Inddstrial Park, Haven 4,venue Overlay District South - Industrial Park, Haven ivenue Overlay District East - Industrial Park West - industrial Park, Havea Avenue Overia:r istri.t D. Sile- �'aaracteristics: The site is currP;atly d.veloped with two of'$ ce mul tj -tenant indusWal buildings. All cm -site and off,, site improvements have been completed. A vacant pad _,xists where the intended office buildings is to be constructed. h� PLAWRING C"ISMU SMFF REPORT V! 884-37 tltman- McD --%ald and Partners December 14, 1988 Page 2 I KJ E. Parking CnIculationss Number of Nober of Type Square Parking Spates Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Office 26,265 11284 1K 105 It. ANALYSIS A. Gen,titl: This projoct was pjrevirusty approved in 1986 owever, bull sing permits expired on the building as wall as the Planning Cormaissian approval. Therefore the applicant ;sas required to resubmit for a new approval on the projtict. Neither building elevations nor site plan have changed the proposed use is corsistent with the goals of the Haven A-tanue Overlay Distaict and with surrounding uses. 8. T.shnlcal Review 0wittee: The Committee reviewed the project and made the foil o ing rec"endations 1. Existing overheada utilities: a. The existing overhead utilities (c4~.+austicatior-j for 66 KV ale^tricar) along the prajed4ls ',ort.h b- .+undary J should be unde ~grounded from the firs?' .,le on the west side of tWtea Avenue to the first pol *- -off -sits. east of the pro3r-'!s east boundary, prior *a public improveme,ni .rcceptance or occlipancy, whichever occurs first. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one4half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on Ae opposite side of the street. b. An in T1 Je -_j as contribu�ica to the future J undergraundim of the existing_ overhead utilities (railroad trlecowinicxtion lines! on the project side l of the W7! Rai *road should be paid to t'e City prior to the issy ce of building permits. The fee shall be the full 44, ted unit t.Aount times the length 'rocs the. center of PAven Avenue to tha east project b6undary. The devalzpar request a reimbursement agre nt to receive one -half thiq adnoted cost for future development lre43veloament) t?• it occ.irs on the roath side of the ATASF Railroad. . . .. .. . . /07-01-0'2 .12-14-881 -PC Agenda a 9 of 7 PLANNING CtlPtdISSION STAFF REPORT OR 88-37 - Utitan- McDonald and Partners aecemljar 14, 1988 Page 3 These conditions are being recom ended atthis time because the, undergrounding policies have changed since the original approval of this project and were,not included in the original approval, C. �Design Review Committee: ,The Committee (Emerick, McNiel, DoT -eman rev eWW0R— die `"pvo3lct on November 17, 1968 and recommended approval to the V1enning Commission. Although the Committee felt that the painted concrstg tilt -up material proposed for the building was not consi „tent with the desired style for Raven Avenue, it was agreed that the materials were appropriate in order to maintain a consistency with the three existing ` IdIngs. D. Environmental Assessment: A Wgati -e Declaration was issued or tne pro ec un ed r it original approval on May 14, 1985. Tharefore, additional action is not required. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The proposed use is consistent with the Uneral Plan and - 1155 ,ren Avrkue Overlay District, 'rAe building design and site plan together with th-as recommended of approval are in compliance with the Haven Ayttiue Overlay District; The pro ect will not be detrimental to the health, ty, lfare, or materially injurious to surrount4oj. properties. I RECL�R+IEN ION: Staff recommends that the Plannitig ;omission "app ve ve otent Review 88 -37. Respect t l subm t ed, i Brad B r City Pla ner BB:CW:Yc Attachments: Exhibit "A” Location Map Exhibit "B`° - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Elevations Resolution of Approval with Conditions KI U Mz)) AS mc) IFA n 00 (; .7 407806 1606 I I a I LIM NORTH CITY OF 4W AN& I RANCHO CUCAML0jNGA TULE. PL.,',NNING Diy,1690N EXHIBrr. SCALE-z CIRCULATION 100, R.O.W. 88' or less R.o.w. RAIL SERVICE +++++ Existing Proposed TRAIL 3/11101.1TES 0 0 0 0 Peoistrian 0 • 0 Bicycle Regional Multi-Use sj)ocial Streetscape/ Li -Nocaping P(,wor Line/- Utility Easimmkint Creeks & Channels Bridge Access Points 'Park Fire Station U Mz)) AS mc) IFA n 00 (; .7 407806 1606 I I a I LIM NORTH CITY OF 4W AN& I RANCHO CUCAML0jNGA TULE. PL.,',NNING Diy,1690N EXHIBrr. SCALE-z �-• �c `,per ' n_•�y+ rse�'v ��Y`�t CM sTR[R rA�T -9 •g 3 C AA, �' S IF -}} I << I _ALA ic 7*4 It n .Mh it r atrxq � F •i } Q � 7 i �r Ka -+ r ACACIA STREET I I ��1 J NORTH CITY OF ITEM ---1 RANCHO CUCA iMOiNGA TITLE: PLANNING DIVIS ON EYF-I1BIT: SCALt, � p5 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCIMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 88 -37, FOR A 26,265 SQUARE FOOT TWO -STORY OFFICE BUILDING LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN HAVEN AND ACACIA STREET IN THE HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS Iii SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209 -401- 01. A. Recitals. (1) Utman- MacDonald and Partners has filed an application for the approval of Development Review No. 88-37 as described 'in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On the 14th of Decembers 1:088, the Planning Come sign of the City cif Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and,conciuded said meeting on that date (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, its is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planting Commission of the Cit.* of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting on December 14, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Acacia Street and is presently improved with three (3) multi - tenant industrial buildings: and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is the AT &SF Railroad, the property tai the south of that site consists of office /industrial buildings, the property to the east is industrial uses, and the property to the west is predominantly vacant. (c) The current proposal is co:isistent with previous approvals. 3. Based upod the substantial evidence presented to this Commission curing the above - referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds anti concludes as fellows: --7 PLANNING C"ISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 88-37 - Utman- McDonald S Partners December 14, 1988 Page 2 (a) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan, and (b) That the proposed use is in accord with tha objective of the Development CCie and the purposes oil the district in which the site it located; ana (c) That the proposed use is in complian-ce with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and (d) That the proposed use, tonether with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health_ safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity, 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that +h- project has been reviewed and considered in compliance, with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission issued a Negative Declaration on r-y 14, 1986. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth, below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein ty this reference. Planning Uivision 1. Any proposed roof mounted equipment shall be screened and the design shall be architecturally integrated with the elevations. Detail plans shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 2. A combined monument/project identification sign shall be provided at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Acacia Street.. The desi5it of such sign shall be consistent with the southerly approved project (DR 84-51) and the Haven Avenue {{ Dverlay District requirements. Sign permit application shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance { of building permits. 3. Special landscaping treatment shall be provided along Acacia Street and within the parking area adjacent to Acacia Street to, f mitigate the loss of tree planting within the Metropolitan Water District easement. Therefore, extensive tree planting shall be provided between the easement and Buildings "A" and "D".. The easement itself shall be planted with shallow rooted trees, PLANNING COMISSiON RESOLUTION NO. OR 88-37 - Iltman- ftDonald & Partners December 140 1988 Page 3 shrubs, and groundF)ver. A continuous hedgerow shall be planted to screen the parking areas from Haven Avenue and Acacia Street. Deming shall be provided along Haven Avenue and Acacia Street with an average height of three feet and a maximum slope not to exceed 34 feet within the Metropolitan Water District easement. Apsprovai from the Metropolitan Water District of the detail landscape and irrigation plan; shall be subm4tted to the Planning Division prior to,City`s approval of the landscape and irrigation plans and prior to issuance wf building permits. 4. Pedestriai:- oriented facilities such as shaded seating areas with attractive landscaping, fountains, kiosk, benches, trash receptacles and other street furniture shall be provided within the c+ntrailized plaza area. Detail plans shall be included in the landscape and irrigatior+ plans and shall be subimitt::d for 7lanning Division reA ew and approw-1 prior to issua:ce of building permits. S. Full material samples of the texturiaed material within the plaza area shall be submitted for Planning Division revim and approval prior to issuance of building permits. S. Greater roof sleight variation for Building "B" shall $e provided. Revised plans shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to submitting for plan check.. 7. The sctitheast corner of Building "C" and the northeast corner of Building "D" shall be cut off to flair out the landscaping as shown in Exhibit "C". Revised elevations submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to submitting for plan check. S. Two parking spaces adjacent to the landscape setback located at the most easterly project entrance shall be eliminated for providing stacking distance as whown in Exhibit "Cu. 9. Large landscape planters and pedestrian walkways shall be provided within the row of parking spaces at the curve of the driveway across from the southern tip of Building 18" as shown In Exhibit "C". Engineering Division 1. notice of Intention to join the proposed Median Island Landscape Maintenance District shall be filed with the City Council prior to issuance of building permits. 2.. Existing overhead utilities: a. 6th Street (vacated) - The existing overhead utilities (communications for 66 KY electrical) along the project's PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 88-37 - Utman- WOonaid & Partners December 14, 1988 Page 4 north boundary shall be undergrounded from the first pole on the west side of Haven Avenue to the first pole off -sitA east of the project's east boundary, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one -half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. b. Railroad Right- af-Way - An in -lieu fee as contribution to the future undergruunding of the existing overhead utilities (railroad telecommunication lines) on the project side of the AT&SF Railroad shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be the full adopted unlit amount times the length from the center of Haven Avenue to the east project boundary. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one -Ralf the City adopted cost for future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the north side of the ATBSF Ral road. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Carry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Grad Buller, U rY - I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify, that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, paased, ana adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of December, 1988, by the foiloking vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: -r- 16 11 V Jai G E E Oftbw pmr Qu F ytl N AEApNyp�N tIYM N + ~M ' QOA ^ CA ^aA0 �yQ LT aiY CY g.z{s eE tii Q iN'Y"' w`oiyoa jG «�$w.Y 'weN aria Ls o�yp$Y its Rw4SE N M1 *l0'VMp ¢Y1,�V {LYt�4�A ♦ °`a�N�SNyGM �q ^Y wLi' =_ gfw�er.�,p'pz '^YC n'� �G =. Q ^ wrYr (M. C YW NQ �Q Diu u�LIS CN =• MY II�ui qYp p!r AN A a Co N4 �I JiN yaN3w go- �O�VY. $r� psi gos utv M.� y;�Y vQyu�Ni pGR QYIY N C i pp CC =y yy +i p w 1 Mj Q- ~w ~Z C09 �l1.� NCY4 Nqw. i�� OV SIT r•`� t� Ly YY Y P Yyy ! C N MCpC r N Y Y YNY .Y pY _M Z L �.Ty� "!! Y -• L ..S aw CdQNN YW L O py 1M 2� Q5 wVVYS 1 ' Y C ,S% Y C LY � � w �'p. fM q .pv �'1 ]� r.s � 0 ffl. y I ~ \•�dT 7�1 inl 2 yO T N O f.1 Yl 0 u t Y Y 4 _C LX L $ a° ` OI ?' 4 � ir$Hws e M Y k4i; �y.•� si aYY pp G '�5 t ; a a; - O pppp W. �a� _ ± is �wO ^'Q$Yi sQw�Y1 M M K - Maa pY 4p jut' X! $ O ee� Y Y 4 _C LX L $ a° ` OI ?' 4 � ir$Hws e yp s 6 �y.•� aM N� A 7 aYY pp G '�5 S •...� � •• {, pOO''VV3S b� �w I�Oe Ni.•i+Nn h 2 ER NI �I �I K - �I • O) M Tom�' f; Z u T r� �• yy « ° �DN �I N O4 a Y L" p y� js; c N� L ^t C .^ OVp ,4 M - b�� r• YO Y aYr 2l C Y IS X11,6 � C4L� Be r'. Y•T ^g$ y� -�i« ° "~'G Y�+� L 01'pp��C yrw Q3 o' _ °ur'g��y_urC� Y a M. -jg i raas. NSA Y«A 3�u�y�pgcw `T°L Mtwyyss1 yy s 9. eLIO YF"q� ~y��N3i3`lLP4� 3 -Ef�N��q 5'Zi FS KAJ his S. ^C!� Y hafr1yY+S0. 4.l [f j s.Q'Ss I a�'ieHU'w rfr $o°�N` ■++ . i JJ: "'i t a r u."• r w t +� ;t..y .�'r. a_'S"5i aTdZ'•ya `a V !f �C� L tl i� Y tlr• � ff � `�� 6� � x� �Y. SE Y++ ti" N L G 1I rTy �,, CY quuM ON ^�Q4Y; OF yy.(Y�/ L ^V ZNaccTCC� �i. goo $o a «. � « 5 �' N 6-ag j �;i M Ins It 0• V �Rnq.�NT.�y.i a�l� 'Oi�Ci>CI M Tinz -fi"l.L� AC= NN -. 0 iq ppZ Z 6 N Igo L� O yip N' N. � Y ..A4 ^O i w S 9.�YR Asj �IL a�ry�++C �1 C. 32I. .Vs �l pY. M ==Ga Tic N 3. @,py arF pNm M i Lxlr�p! �! 4c 1y^,11 zz -0 �. i4 ^V. ya' {3$^G yr, f 9CU NNM.t ,iC Uw ueG P�' �+g`�ti. La Nyyyy! M��. � "�� "~fut �V�{NZ?i'T i✓Y Y �yo�e.N Y�i QCY4�� N4� a'�Y ~`w CCILN� CQY�.�Yy q""��' �ww.`.MS eL- 'svie`a a.�. »'�' -r-)= 0 M� E OAOOs�.J% ~� �Y.p ' ■ >b 1-4 u X44Y N �G a4s Nwwq+ �wY C ^yyL I. '�� Qp�yy V NLC YO.f O Aar Y OI VI �. $�q{6O s ^t�C O wttl O. t {y MUI (T�� NyY 7 a -} C .* oO P,v ~. ^� t� � v «G�t «Y�O ■ ?`2VV + Y ® rCel Qp rp Ot oM .�nO yV 4yy �Nl'•�6�� ^Y.E WOU 'y�. " + Q" M ` ~. 9 L V'LI .OL`i OL L O GG M V 0)G 2 ` i - 04K V A Y �Nt1 't'•y' O��N qYC MAY '•p. {A¢t. I(()y �.w`CItIy 4LwT ' T AOO1i V )� Y4^O MNY ivEplvO I L ��C C .t M Y Y Y ';: V C c d is, YK. J:= 2" ••p� \ NOON M aOw •.LC.9 or". .y ONLp 4+ O10 �aL -I 6d ="a PLYI W. LM. y+ � ypS F6��A - Cy. Vnil �Y✓ CC Y� I In � Y N. O + G, V w „ N (. "y C _GL C O � 43 1 h ^•�f YPY��!!�y!!tt[B�� _C Nyy,CU Miw O �^FI� �V d,,qa "Vy1'�Y '`4O-gis.� •ar�> ��/` ~.y� it- w CV13 bp,�0 �t•�N$y~ 9 �YLY gVLV ^ �q{ pd4y rtN s�µOLwt« L G�01 .CN n1�w'. p °� ��1OI. « +V+YV ."p Y S i P Op %V.. 'QGj ���i66tttl«)I psi � -9 Tw A�{MII YYM Y''Y ^V0 C~ ■�S! CO "+ NOg L. yV ��{.iIO Y{� M'�Q 6 w�Cp Y ~tyN +p`G N�MYN <Y� <N iN0 `.' l iN --Ogg iC� '.Y1 i0 w{'It �r �4 ONGM yyyyy p L 'C e IQ {{LL•}} � w+ ~ )`Y p..IL 6SN jib•�6 M V q y.'S N �� �� q s 'gay w eel a '� . BIgg 1. us Uz ` a NN V �YyM1 �r � Y CSpOSN YOrw �!1 �Av A 1,42 84 OC fT -me � NaA x Itz C�W 3 "GN . 1y' L.pi Shy* w °` y`�� Lp° t « ■V Tuy "qC Utz. VYMb ,C• N,tl..r 'OC fill �y�L .�. wN r1Y ■1L �q�� pp '0 N uY y �ezz L a�� EL� C " C YV « ;" Yw« QNE $Y2€ �� S" �� „� sew g wwyp KY ^<� <5N 46 .CC./ t� �tl K MAO, O GM Vi wOi YO. y r. L 4 W M G.y w pslatt .fit «L.Li. �C Y^`Yx 3L� IAZ �1,1��Y iL yMy�d MR (i YC� yam; .5 iZ9 +�us� ss4.yz tt�G4q _O f�•� x•11`; �. Mrs F Oy 3 1���. *__l I \�i \� gI 4wp N pcA M 3 M .N yy€ C N! 144 N O aS rA *N i C N N V `l V L 1.. Q M64u N���lm cMc 44 eLt�, ,� Lj� Z YYOO Sy VS is @YaY a CVO �y ey 6 O M^ Q 4rii Y y ` � Y N� 1 NI y ey�Q N dv pp W � N `CO��$Y� O N T N 4+N! w �p M ��IdJ� qw abw \j�'r �a Y N y yg N V qrr Y 4 a71XE:� LLY,T 4� A y y i o o' o u o ��l -ao �l � � a aN g'(y'ysgj ° 8 g ° P P� . 4 Mile M 60 >>�1J DYL �4Yj » w LM4 .L6 �i; O L C.N W 6 �~ `1Y�Y■Y +y :w NM 4 • �p w.N C C a y �. , �yy� YVw �yA4�l1^ ^��a •.00M MO US ia.'- Isi jV'al 4wp N pcA M 3 M .N yy€ C N! 144 N O aS rA *N i C N N V `l V L 1.. Q M64u N���lm cMc 44 eLt�, ,� Lj� Z YYOO Sy VS is @YaY a CVO �y ey 6 O M^ Q 4rii Y y ` � Y N� 1 NI y ey�Q N dv pp W � N `CO��$Y� O N T N 4+N! w �p M ��IdJ� qw abw \j�'r �a Y N y yg N V qrr Y 4 a71XE:� LLY,T 4� MIS M N` N O � u V 6 M ar Nw N q L � YrTb � ra W y� �p C C a � A �M y O OY.: f 4� 7 �! QC« 4�1 N u� pCC« �► p N YGOI �p V ��p111c y yew Y N 'a 9 Nji y3E+ f L d M y MC IT 6 d lb. tb. A Y L .Y�21� py �� WtL 8 ins �Y.V N l'f O A y y i o o' o u o ��l -ao �l � � a aN g'(y'ysgj ° 8 g ° P P� . 4 Mile M ra W y� �p C C a � A �M y O OY.: f 4� 7 �! QC« 4�1 N u� pCC« �► p N YGOI �p V ��p111c y yew Y N 'a 9 Nji y3E+ f L d M y MC IT 6 d lb. tb. A Y L .Y�21� py �� WtL 8 ins �Y.V N l'f O 1 V LSJ R 11 y fig tit A �Y K. 1Ma S S t' y� Y`��py. EE M '� �. L y V ppqpppC u0 1r�gE�Y� 4spiiw. C�QV�y1A y� ad VM wai6 "s e�K rj. 'g CV yp.. O y c al y+ C3S w 9��'r�i� 2"i M A��N. �; •��(./M� „ �i M�1 �y 0.. 1� P- 192 �Zfi w�: g'� v g's �P g^ ^� E3 3g C � ~ V Y � • �« V V y 0 9y iu' y� aY F�YY q + w tk w .�QDDQ N. 4A WNV W y� 8 �U O U� Ap YW y b tl xg M D Ne a ~y O M �C 0 qS {}�Y►r .y�r. { ^Y,1 yjp�.� N y ST {}, pL #(g� }�s, 3 fig p Xx YY ^y � • � 4 "Yl+r3+ ~N ^i. s'Y L:.lgijf tpr y $ +a%$ ZuR tick �+1y�aMf�.,,, rL18 as r o tq,i $ pOYa �b �Nq Y ;J NYC+ Ys� M K1 N TLI • .s+ 9i -E. A v- t ' r tali$ �� Q Gtr ®!i !~ � ftlV t�4 p, gilt 0i3 > +jam -r )J:�, APO u rt- Mme' a n y r ca gn %yL aly' L Hl rte 1 3 fir ST O W sut M V.V 02 5 YY w 'L 4 7i� 444 pl L �s:LL■,p g$ OR 33 C ilk L a'x t4 ac; tt» N L d oh EYW w M Kya. APO u rt- Mme' a n y r ca x` W 2 A w $ " ii. Wp y Tf 4r N i U `81 y yw T I N? Is ze Ij 1♦x. 71 �( A _R yx„ y yx+M�,ww M r Nl(i a4 YM tl_Y� t� V. 1 0 Ll L fir ST O W sut M w 4 7i� K pl L Ai i s jag `a t ixN r w a +c 15.1 w P s 2 ap ms w ±i ri i x` W 2 A w $ " ii. Wp y Tf 4r N i U `81 y yw T I N? Is ze Ij 1♦x. 71 �( A _R yx„ y yx+M�,ww M r Nl(i a4 YM tl_Y� t� V. 1 0 Ll } ai 0 �" 1-h K o 1 ais .e y n �8.fy « N 7 a Y Ypp bbbb� w 4 3 =t aye Mme« �a4r� 4 N N C t�N Jay u« ppwwY b ii ors A —I fig N @y ~ YW � a ids 1t M 4 r � M(L 114 HI all i! A .may