The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1989/01/25 - Agenda Packet0701 -02 ol- 25--89 PG Agenda o I of 5 a 0 arvOF PLANNING COMMISSION AG+1 WEDNFSDAY Janua* 25, 1989 7 :00 P.M. UOM PARR COMMUNrrY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUPORNI',A L Pape of Allegianee 1L Rail Call Commissioner Blskesley Commissioner Eme ick _ Commissioner Chitiea Commissioner McNiel _ Commissioner Tolstoy 131. Amaau:cements IV. Approval of mutes January 11,196 V. Cont Calendar, The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine mad non - controversial. They wilt be acted on by the Commission at wr+e time wt,�,t uct disci :sston. If anyone heel concern over any item, it should be r- rtrtovsd for dbcuu .3)n. A. VACATION OF JUNEBERRY DRIVE - FONTA.NA STEEL C. - A roquest to vacate Jynebenj Drive, loceite',` s±uth of meow Route, approximately 60 feet wide and 710 feet 1,.% g. - APid: 229-121-35. B. VACATION OF A PORTION OF ALMOND AVENUE CARYN M ANY - A request to vacate a portion o Almond Avrsmt.4 located south oV 24th Street of Etiwanda area, approximately 23 feet widit and 1,812 feat long. AFN: 226- 111 -01. C. DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 13541 - PRIDEMARK - The design review of building W-1—evations and detailed- site plan tar 11 of 12 singllo family lots af,a, previously approved tract finals I on 4.42 acres of land in the Lbw • 4esidential District (2-4 dwelling :units per &ere),, Ideated on Sierra Vista, north of Red Iiiil Country Club Drive - APN 207- 032 -01. D. DESIGN REVXEW FOR TRACT 116061 - EL CAPITAN LOPMP- ' CO., INC. r Review a bite plats and building elevations fora previously approved tract conaistang of 41 SuVe family residences on '11.3 acres of land in the Lew Residential .District (2-4 dwe]4*1g units per acre), located east at Mango, south of Victoria: Areet - APN: 202 - 771-01 thru 41. E. TIME EXTZNSION FOR PA110EL MAP 9431 - ZIUMAR y? "'DDS RIBS - A dtIL -ton of 2.g4 acres into 4 par in the 'fiery Low 2` dwe'.�* units per acre) Development District, located an the east side of Meryl Avenue, south of 11111side Road - APNt 1061 - 611 -04. VL lPubUd Hearings MO fallowing items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the relates! project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stc:ting yaxar rnam and adda�ss. All Such opinions shalt be limited to 5 mirnttes per individwl for such project, sF,, ENVI 6mmENTAL P,H, iSSMEWT AND DEVELOPMEN`! I R W 8 Z - 13MITH - We 'addition -ol seven aparttneat units to an es tiro epertment complex consisting of as units ! on 5.33 acres of land In the Medium Residential District (3-14 �\ dwelling units per acres ), located on the east side of Archibald Avenue, south of Gh tro=t Street - APNs 1077- 332 -25. (Continued from,Decasmber 14,1988.) Cx, FslIVIRONMENTAL :4SSEWMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE Igo EGG AT1 IYsIIVER - 1'ht; request to <: establish a t:ouapu'cer elafiSr0arnt and a ice In a leased space of 1,000 square feat within an existing multi-tenant industrial park on 4.61 sores of iantd in the Haven Avenue Overlay District, located; at &tven Avt�lue - APP: 209- 262- 7. (C'ontinuad from January 11, 1989.) ff. ENYMONMANTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN IS�31 =ti=p — i » e3 request to amend the rat Plan band Lisa frOM Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to Low - Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling unAs per aoras) for 4 sorts of Iand, located at the southeast comer Of Milliken Avenue and Vintage Drive - APNs 225 - 261 -47, L sWMONMENTAL ASSESSMENT A14D i EVELW1MEPiT D CT AM t81 N 11TA55I A request to amended UW Development District _ ramp Residential (2 dwelling units per acre) to Low- Medlum residential (4.8 dweiiirg units per acre) for 4 acres of land, lo" *d at the southeast comer oaf na,xiiken Avenue and Vintage Drive - APNs 225 �53y;4`J. s .1 J ENVIRONMENTAL .aS'SESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMBNDMiNT z1S-0 - €9ILLiAM LYON 6%1M T9NY - A iequest to amend tKO sites of fire land use neap of the General Plan within the Victoria Groves (west of Milliken on 9.3 acres) and Victoria: Vineyards (east of Milliken 12.9 f1jeres) Villages, located on ttY- .south east and west corners of Highla -4 and Milliken Avenues. The request proposes changing the designations from Medium -high Residential (14- 24 welling units per acre) to Neighborhood Commercial on the east site and Nis! Ibochood Commercial to Low- Medium Residential (4-$ dwell* augts per acre) oa the west site - APl 227. 411 -22 and 2 02- 211 -48. K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COtJiMU Y LAN AMENA14f NT -01 - wILL AM LYON CO-- - request to amend the land: nse designations within the'Victorie Groves (west of Milliken on 9.3 acres) aced Victoria Vineyards (east of Milliken 12.9 acres) Villages Ot the Victoria Community Plan, Iocated on the south . east aml west corners of Highland and 'Milliken Aventies. the request propusols chatginkT the des gnations from Medium -High Residential (14 -24 wening units per acre) to Neixbborhaorl Gammercial on the east site and Neighborhood:Commescisl to Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelift units per acre) on the west site d APNs 227- 011 -22 W002-211-48. L. VARIANCE 8847 - CASTLE - A request to allow ;t room addition to encroach into the required interior side yard setback by 5 feet for a single family residence in the Low Residential Distrie t (2.4 dwelling units Psf ,acre), located at 9868 Cypress. Court - APNs 241-403 15� M. EIl'fIRONM!kNTAL ASSMMIIAND TENTATIVE TRACT Nil A raa dontia1 riitbdivision o b single family iota odd 2.4 acres of land in thad! Low Residential biwYrict (2-9 dwelligr units per acre), located at the trorthwest orner of Lemon and Loren Avcnueji - APNs 201 -251 -57 and 66. N. MMONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN RAN'1 f3 GB7C M 19GA - r��luest to amen3 a total 0 1 appmximaYely 10 acrn parcels AV of the General Plan land use map, from Medium Residential. (8 -14 dwelling twits per acre) to 'Low - Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), for' those Parcels 1"an-ted on the sOuth aide of Lemon extenftV approxim tely it 1,100 feet east of Archibald .Avenue and the Parcel art the north side of Highland extending 780 feet east of Archibald Avenue - APNs 201252-01, 03, 04, 21, 22, 39, 40, 41, 42, a-,nd 43. h J O. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND IINDUSTAIAL ECIFAC PLAN .?Y dSNDMEKS 89-91 - C rff t�F RANCHO CUCAi M—OIN A - ' ; r est to mod the local &treat circulation. pattern .hitht,t Subarea 8, located north of Arrow Route, between ' As I -15 Freeway and Etiwe`Ae, Avenue, necessitated by &,-'proposed MWD power generating plwatt at th6 northwest corner of Etivs ada and Arrow. P. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESEIBNT A*3D VOOTHILL_SPECIP19 PLAN AMENDMENT 89 -01__ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to na�dd$ y the Regional Related CommerVie1ard use option frvm APB?: 229- 021 -59 and 219 - 031 -15, sail show1�ccess points for the block bounded by Foothill Boulevard or_ the north, Arrow Route on the south, I- 15 Freeway on tlzrk est, and EtiwWWa Avenue on the east, necessi* ted by a proi*osed MWD power generating plant at the, northwest corner of Eti,:anda and Arrow. EMVifcbNh1ENTAL . ASS SSMEN'F AND VICTORIA CC3i4III�fUNITY LAN AMEND '_'ll' - WIILLIAM LYON COMPANY K. revision to land use and circulation affecting approximately i 130 acres for Phase One of time Vlllege of Victorik Lakd t, South, bounded by Base tone Road to the north, Minter 'Avenue to the south, the easterly bi ra W%T c4 the Victoria ,Planned Community to the east} i and the Southern California 141son corridor to the west; d pd vtriOu s amendmeptt to ]and use °till circulation to reflecl i''as-kuilt" conditions within the Villages of Windrows, VIW ,mods and Groves. ' R. VARIANCE 97 -11 - CUCA1V1OL --1 COUNTY_ WATER D RICT - A request to reduce the minimum required. average 5ndscape setbaek, wtd to allow a $ -foot block wall in the :squired setback, within the. Litility District of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plans, located at the southeast corner of 3a n Bernardino 'Road and Xiusman Avenue - APL': 208-151 -30, 07, 09,10,11, Mid liter S. ANNEX 89-01 - NOTICE OF pREpAR,ATiON OF A DRAFT NV .t1 M AL it A RY ORT FOR T WANDA NUWr— Pia - A request by the City of ancho Cuucemon > to studg the Teasibili¢y of _%nneration and development of approximately 6,000 dwelli. units on apptoximat,tiy 5,64f; acres of land under multiple ownerships un the unincorpomted area of San Bernardino County. The project is ger- ,.ally boundaJ on the north by the National Forest, on the ,south by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on the east by the City of Fontana, and on the west by the extensica of MiUUccn Avtnua. A Specific Flan will be prepared for this project area. The public hearing is being eonde:}cted for the purpose of defining the scope of the Enviro,!mental Impact Report, �i VM Old T. 'ElIVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT UVIEVI 88-10 - DIVERSIFIED - The developraant 7Wase ilf of a neighborhood commorciea shopping center consisting of two retail builWngs totalirg 14,800 square feet on 12.56 acre3 of land within an approved shopping center In the Neighborhood Commercial District, located at the northeast corner of Haven wd highland Avenues - APN: 201- 271 -45 and 71. (Continued from October 26,'1988.) U. DEVZJi QPMENT REVIEW 88-37 - UTMAN- MACDONAL>2 & r !4R.TNE - The development of a LWS-r ;ry square ;Aot o ire building an 7.09 acres of Sand in the haven Avenue Overlay District (Subarea 6), loc!�e, at the = thews:; r corner of ° Haven Avenue and Ac"la S.eset APNa 209- 4101 -01, (Continued from January 11P 1989.) V. UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM FOR THOMAS WINERY PLAZA OAS INVESTORS VM Direc 'th i Repert9 W. L l3l VISTA TREE MASTER P*,AN - Presantation of stract ' tPBe as EtErA. ista. . R. CARYN (VINTAGE HIGi€LAND3) FENCING - Disouss.on o' possible amendment to regugre fencing Ducal- de-sac streets front the psaeo trail system. �. C�aaatniselaa M 1?tyi w Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Coanmissioru Items to be discumod here are those which do not already appear an this agenda. IL wt j The Pla nnirrg Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations � Mat wet an 11 P.M. adjournment time. It items go beyond that j time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission.. i i i VICINITY' MAP 000#4 1014R.10644L ikWtur ICbT1P` CW IRAK%W CUC1►MOM4 O v CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 25, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: William J. Silva, Deputy City Engineer BY: Gary Sheu, ftsistani; Civil Engineer SUBJECT: VACATION OF JUNEBERRY DRIVE - FONTANA STEEL INC. A request to vacate unT' eberry Drive,-located south of rrow Route, app,,oximately 60 feet wide and 710 feet long. - APN: 229 - 121 -35. I. BACKGROUND On February 24, 1988, the Planning Commission adapted Resolution No. 88 -42, and approved DR' 87 -51 with a condition that Juneberry Drive be vacated as a public street, but retained as ,an access and utility easement for the property south of the subject development, II. ANALYSIS: The City has received a request from the owner that vacation a .1cur. The subject right6of -way is 60 feet wide and is unimproved. It is not required as part of the circulation system for the Industrial Specific Phan, or the City's General Plan. III. RECOWENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Cm,,`ssion m ke the finding that the street vacation confor*�;s with the General Plan. This finding will be forwarded to the City Council for further processing and final approval. Respectfully submitted, William J. Silva, P.E Deputy City Engineer WJS:dlw :ly Attachment ITUI A KRUEPER ENGINEERIpNG Q AWOCIATES, INC. CIViL ENGINEERING • SURVEYUNP& ! ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND CONSULTING SW NORTH MOUNTA& VNLW AvL wL SetONO FLOOR O SAN BERNAFOINO, CALIFORNIA 92305 -1291 M 714- 884215 FAX No, 7t4.888-8 December 9, 1988 Resse Refer To Our File No. 1958 -02.29 City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department 9320 Baseline Road Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention: Mr. Gary Sheer Mr. Steven Allen Regarding: Fontana Steel Project 12451 Arrow Route OR 87-51 Subject: Vacation of Juneberry Drive Gentlemen Per your request, we have prepared a separate legal description for the vacation of Jvneberry Drive whicn is identiLal to the recorded offer of dedication 8655/694 O.R. Also attached is an exhibit showing the area within Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 78474 MB 82148 -51, which is to be vecated. If you shoul4 need any additional information,. please do not hesitate to contact our office. Yours very truly, KRU €PER ENGINEERING & ASSOCIATES, INC. 4 %u: Fred J. Babbitt R.C.E. 27674 FJB: Eep WNSULInNo • R6WRPS & LANi1 mAwt,* a SUnvzywa a [tl ;p cnc, -A e. w^-ma 1 3ANrTA'RON e. STRCL' a TmArm EhcmzrRINO N RUEAER ENGINEERING & ASSOCIATES, INC. CIVIL E NG1NERRINe 0 $URVEY ING d ACCIDENT ANALYMS AND CONSULTiNG SW f, om ri muttrAiN Mew AVLNVeL S=m FL09R i sm EumNAmoINo.'CAuponNU 92401.1291 0 714.8U -4.1 S9 r FAX No. 714.848 -8910 December 8, 1988 Floats Rsfor To c3;: FIs No. LVAL DESCRIPTION FOR JUNEBERRY DRIVE (O.R. 8645/694) VACATION PER SPECIAL CONDITION NO. 2, PAGE 4, OR 87 -52 PARCEL 1 Commencing at the intersection of the South line of Arrow Route, 60,00 feet wide as described in deed to said County, recorded November 6,. 1924, in Book 870, Page 369 of Deeds, with the East line of said Southwest quarter of Section 8; thence South 000 22' 17" West, 20.00 feet along the East line of said Southwest quarter to an intersection with a line that is parallel with and distant 50.00 feet South of the centerline of said Arrow Route; thence North 890 41' 10" West along said parallel line, a distance of 922.91 feet to a point in the East line of land described in deed to Southern Surplus Realty Co., recorded December 14, 1474, in look 8580, Page 19, Official Records, said point also being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 010 27, 27" West (record South 10 12" 19" West) Tong said Easterly line, a distance of 710.34 feet thence South 8911 411 1011 East to an intersection tith a line that is parallel with and 60.00 feet East from the East line of said Southern Surplus Realty Co, property, thence North 010 2711 27" East along said parallel line a distance of 710.34 feet to a point in a line that is parallel with and distant 50.00 fAet South of Lhe centerline of said arrow Route; thence North 890,+1, 10" West along said parallel line 60,00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF 9EGINOING. PARCEL 2 A triangular shaped parcel of land bounded as follows: On the West by the East line of said Parcel No. 1; on the North by a line that is parallel with and 50.00 feet South; measured at right angles, fr," the centerline I)f said Arnow route; and on the Southeast by the arc of a curve concave to the Southeast and having a radius of 20.00 feet, said curve being tangent to the East line of said Parcel No. 1 and tangent to said parallel line, Prepared By KRUEPER ENGINEERING & ASSOCIATES, INC. rw ©ti� g�SIiESStpf /Q Fred J. Babbitt R.C.E. 27674 FJB -mgb Nip. 27674 CONSULMN"3 0 REPORTS. 9 LAND KANNjt4 s 3UAVCVWO 0 tNSP9Cr10M 0 WAITL'1F. 0 SMMA TAN s STREETS. & TPAeTNk, t. 41NEEJUNG EXH1$fT A oftc r Parcel 9 Parcel 2 60° a €fer of -dedlcathn see insert per $6451694 O.R. � UT ,y w !S i D d � f��hk" C� AIM► � /A,�l1 dAl� � y�yy gyx/sw,r yyw.rwvw+ ww:wF 5 l may' 'O rV AVJV •~ Mr* • / P �I CPTY OF ]RANCHO CUCAMONOA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 25, 1989 °`1- TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission. FROM: William J. Silva, Deputy City Engineer BY: Gary Sheu, Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: VACATION OF A PORTION OF ALMOND AVENUE - CARYN COMPANY - A rtes vacs s a portion o Almond venue, oca south of 24th Street of Etiwanda area, approximately 23 feet wide and 1,812 feet long - APR: 226- 111 -01 I. BACKGROUNDIANALYSIS On July 22, 1987, the Planning Commission adopt►:d the Resolution No. 87 -126,, and approved Tentative Map No. 15566. One of the conditions for the approval is that the developer submit a request for the vacation of a portion of Almond Avenue. The subject street right -of -way vacation is approximately 23 f,.�4, wide and 1811.94 feet long, located south of 24th Street, ihe vacation is consistent with the General Plan, the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. II. RECOMMENDATION: Staff Recommends that the Planning Co=ission make tha finding that the street vacation confOM. 5 witi the General Plan. This finding will be forwarded to the City Council for further processing and final approval. Respectfully submitted, William J. Silva, PA, Deputy City Engineer WJS:GS:ly Attachment ITEM 5 EXiitBl`P „A" A tTd3CtZ'4N OF A PMICK OF AUUM AVMM mm pmcm OF l►tbno Avam, m no any OF pmm anomGAr comm OF 577 WWRDnio, Sim= OF mzmA -M, 60.00 FmT W=, AS c6saimm ni A MW TO -Vt {MTi'9f OF SAN nrj, MR ,BOf,'4{ „A "r a= 235 OF R#?J3 2 1986, ri Zii�Lm PAF4EL CV. LVM P M; A,. MW IliSli7flo7P NO. 86 3056 OF op nCM , At A8 SWU Chi A MAP FIIM IN HOOK 73, PA= 39 AND 40 OF M---WW OF SM& , MWOPMS OF SAM O"i° ' • IoKr, ATPA+t3W HM,tb AND BY Tas r4aWo= MM A EARL' HMMF. fI j �ACCU�X=, NLLAf. G MHWM: S i.S. 3118 a P, ,rav E}p 'ICTi Dm: MM 30 1992` Ra 3113 i-]492 * aitOQ�\t, Is l IG-216 442.0201 E EXHIBIT "B" ASANDONMCnr OF A PORTION OF ALMOND AVENUE 1vol IflZlajtZ P�IZ ��131sPi~3D 90ko umb MY LIMI"-CITY ar Wlk �o= NE 1/4 SEC. 27 a R.S. 71 N. R. 6 VY. S.S.M. 73 / 39 -40 iW)T. ►10, eb-tAlo� Tpf-T MOW I� i 9� ZU 1W 10 A�M Td 6 4AG4 09 SS00 J:xlrtlhrnse� S1de 761? SomwAn& CAk**vds9J7W P'70)21QtJt�P I �xP'�a)Y�a•e ! ,� btj� M41C.11�M�'� uif1� I!�l�h1O1A1 r, r -1 FUSCCW WIMMM UNDOREW CIO Evneem •fandsum'Oun November 18, 1988 W. shintu Bose City of Rancho P. O. B= 807 9320C Baseline. Road Randal 4"Lh a=xp, California 91330 Dear Mr. Boss F7 RECEIVED NOV 211988 c11Y OF R+M cu�taNOa �«+�axc nms�oH n is letter is to ZWc wt the City of Ranc bo Oxm=iga to 3der the atan on meat of a portion of Almracicl. Avemae, as sbown on t1'A ale -0eea plat. it is of ut mco 44=tance that the CD :y review this issi as as posaible. our client is trying to r+sccrd Tract.s 1356&,, and 13566 -2 W the and of 1988, and this ism- affectz ttA easterly b=ehry of the above mw.ticned try. Please act accordingly, and if theme is anyUdM i can do to help e4pedit:e this matter, please fees, free to call.. Sincerely, p r� + r 7G -3€16 442.0201 25rKdf�: ffriiJ; ktnrac�•: fii: iteftxl• scarrcr: tratr, Cisf�/ rn�iu 'J/d�Y13•ibna:e('?4)35tbiSW! F,-LY('1�8).25/1•,tZt? 11 ri RESOLUTION NO. 87 -126 A RESOLUTION OF THE Pt•ANR NG- GOMMMM OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CBNQION1kh�;gRG TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13566 WHEREAS, TErstative Tract Map No. 13566, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Caryn Development, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real pronerty situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, Stare of California, described as a residential subdivision of 67.8 acres of land into 161 single family lots located at the southwest corner of Summit Avenue and Almond Avenue (APRs. 226 - 111.02), regularly came before the Planning Commission for public h�zaring and action on July 22, 1987; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Flap subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREA ,. the' Planning Commission, has read and considered the Engineering and A anning Division's reports dnd hat, considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga doe, .,esolve as follows: SECTION is The Planning Commission mars the following findings •gin regard to en a :ve Tract No. 13566 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tra,.t is consistent with the Gcnerai .plan, Development Code, and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentativ: tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific.plens, (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (C) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable in„ury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health probi,ems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement a,:quired b,1 the public at large, nuw of record, for 'access through or use of the property within ZNe Froposed subdivision. PLANums massior fCOLUTIOW tlo. d TT 13566 o CARYN OEVE,, MENT . July 22, MY ndQe ? (g) That this project will not c"-ate adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued - SECTION 2: Tentative TrdLt Map No. 13566, a copy of which is attached e e ot— is 'hereby approved subject to all of the following condition,; and.the attached Standard Conditions: Planning Division: 1. Community Equestrian Trails shat', be provided along the north, south, and east trace boundaries. The precise alignment shall be shown on the final map which shall be re;i „ad Mnd approved by the Trails Advisory Committee prior to recordation of the map. 2, One Texas umbrella tree and six (6) Olive trer5 are approved for removal along the east property line and shall be replaced in kind on a one- for -one basic with ini niffum 15 gal l n,; size, ' 3. The Eucalyptus windrow along the north bounda.y ' -shall be removed an.c replaced with columnar type trees as required by the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 4. Average lot size withir, tone tract shall be 15,000 square fek. The revised plans shall be reviewed -and dpproved by the City Planner prior to recorr'''.ion of the final map. (_nginetrin� *on: 1. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications) on the project: (south) side of 24th Street (Upper Summit Avenue) shall be undergrounded along the project frontage extending to the first pole off site (north and east) prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. Reimbursement of one -half the City adopted cost for undergresinding from future deveiopment on the opposite side of the street is not feasible, because the property is in the County. 2. Notice of iciterttion to form and /or join the Lighting and Landscape 3istricts shall be file4 with the City Council prior to recordation of the final map 'or- issuance of building permits, whichever occurs; first. dMill M i rwrf�1� ..ilit�- 9t1.,�► L: L DATE: TO: FROM: BY: S'uW ECT: CITY OF RANCHO GUICAMONGA STAFF REPORT cu�o Cy 'ti7 January 23, 1989 U a W7 Chairman and Members of the ?tanning Comrrc' ssi on 8rau Buller, City Planner Grahn, Assistant Planner DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 13541 PR "', M,ARX - The design rev ew o ui l di ng cvu ons and deem ! & si to plan for 11 of 12 single family lots of a previously approved tract map on 4.42 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre), located an Slw-a Vista, north of Red Hill Country Club Drive - APH: 207- 082 -01. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of building elevations and plot 'pan s. B. Project Density: 2.71 dwelling units per acre C. Surroundini Land Use an'tZoni_ng Roorrth - 1x1ssti ng single rani fy residences, Low Residential dential District South - Existing single family residences, Low Residential District East - Existing single family residences, !nw Residential District West - Existing single family residences, Lour Residential District D. General Plan Desirnations: Pro Low Residential . District (,2 -4 dwelling units per acre) North - Low Residential District (2 >4 dwelling units per acre) South - Low Resik%ntial District (2 -4 dwelling unite per acre) East - Low Residential Dist.•'ct (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) West - Lori Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) E. Site Characteristics: The project site is currently vacant and as been roug graob . Thd units are situated on Sierra Vista 11704 C PLANNING COMbISSION STAFF REPORT DR TRACT 13,541 - FRiDENARK Janu ry 2s, 1989 Page 2 El Street which cuT -de -sac`s north of Red Hill country Club Drive. Secondary emergency access is provided via a 20 foot Wide easement off of Red Hill Drive and ftnte Vista Drive across Let s to Sierra Vista Street. ii. ANALYSIS: A. Generale ?'he applicant is proposing a total of three floor pTansr each with two elevations,. ranging in size from 3,089 square feet to 3.,764 square feet. Ter, of the proposed units sill have thrie -car garages, the remaining unit {Lot 6, Floor Plan 910C) will have a two -car garage. B. Design Review Committee: Titc. building elevations and detailed s e p a`n were rev 'ewe ty the Committee ( Bl akesl ey, Bul l xir Chitiea) on November 17, 1988. The Committee did not recommend saprovnl due to the ¢ul`? 129 concerns: 1. Provide c; -eatdr variation in the building plane and roof lines, 2. Expand architectural treatment respective of the building style. 3. Either increase the building setback of the unit on Lot 2 or switch the units on tots 2 and 3, the applicant then revised the architecture and plot plans based on dssiga issues presentedt by the Committee. The Committee (Emerick, Kroutil, )tkfeT reviewed the project on h necembtr 22, 198$, wever, they, did not recommend approval due to the i011owing concerns: 1. Provide windows and /or arches an the rear elevation of the garage, Floor plan 910. 2, Provide windows on the rear elevation of the garage, Floor Plan 473. The applicant then revised the Architecture based on design issues presented by the committee. The Committee (Blakesiey, Chitiea. Koutil) reviewed the rojec on anuaryn recommen a approve ease on ,e c ow ng c ai FS : 1. Windows in public view should be multi- paned. AOL qP i �e PLW1 ING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT � RR TRACT 13541 v PRIDEMAK January 25., 1989 Page 3 _ r 2. Floor Kan 7950 should incorporate the use of a quatrefoil within the recessed areas above the front door. The design around the attic vents should be similar. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: ll�e project is consistent with the General { Plan and Development- Code. The project will not be detrimental to the public health or, safety, or cause nuisance or significant -i adverse environmental impacts. Tn addition, the {proposed use and l the site plait, togetler with the reconpAnded conditions of approval, are in compliance with applic(i6le provisions of the i Development Code and City Standards. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve e'cesign review of building elevations and plo`.: plans for Tentative Tract 13541 through the adoption of the attached Reseoluti on. - i s Re ci ly m ed, 8 d Sul Cit ne 60:'TG;mig Attachments: Exhibit "9 - Site Utilization Exhibit *S" - Tentativ% Tract Flap Exhibit "G" - Finish dtading Plan Exhibit 'IV" - Building Elevations Resolution of Approval — _ (I - R ti Kim. �rr IM TRACT NIA 13541 'n n4 •m er we cheats;. - 7:n btt.ii7::c cpsn.:xt•rlv:. y. r.CN'A1 to eeM :' y tY:f. IW 31.,wMft 0, {M %us•,/ •• 4- :, ^n Iltw, }••.y e1 JI••t M•1• w• _ INS �N ."H�af•,... i Si.s AZO MU JZkSWVFJ/CM YJLI/Jl •.I fl VII N •N %I /bgrpI JJJIb..�ip; J.ywyrt ' � 77— I l/ 1 — -- 7 tip..• I • � ` '�: �9 170 .r.•y,....�._•.. I.••,rn•: /ssc•msetl�rsi�/,.. ' _-- - -- ��.- +/e�s,w �'• _— /1'I10 .� 4.rtVK III i.— I� / �L� � �1fn 19 it .M /..eyrar o aA REO .. NM• :�M..f:flt} 17 rIMh,Awary C � � ra i w 41 I/ x�-e RRD11 �M�• �fP I. ANA!!p• � �•r..A, yrfJ L >•sAa1• J w ``— '• , {t(! �� ,Its} •er A. 12 ew if Li am d 6117..E an.I'M� • I tr•YR /J.ly /a• ✓.fii :.I..:'0 ".s<.,t/ eat car11M I F ITEM: I�.,..� f RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: 104L01 d \ �P .M /..eyrar o aA REO .. NM• :�M..f:flt} A. 12 ew if Li am d 6117..E an.I'M� • I tr•YR /J.ly /a• ✓.fii :.I..:'0 ".s<.,t/ eat car11M I F ITEM: I�.,..� f RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: 104L01 d n CITY OF ITEM: F ±[ IVV41 RANCHO CUCAMON A TITLM LM� ate. �nT A '�,\?%TT OI T%*tsTerrra�r /r_/ -- -- -- iS/ 11 -- _— awasai'r'rR irrwt. anxiwu•p�sa %roax L1,11111 !! a' of .I t eIIY� Ill I a 0 a 6a r 4Q Foot { �� • ��$� ��s� 1. '�1_. �C� i 11 �i MM7-7 eIIY� Ill I a 0 a 6a r �f �k 1k* 11 a OlMokft , 1 1 h ; I 1f WIWI =IN ii MWE Oil- Ulm MON Now mol li lu U,1111119 UU, mm" ILI IMM a' 0 1:3 rr . L L O m a) MM Vow I� � tt �t I' a r e.7 Em [a RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF PLANNING RANCHO CUC&MMA,TCALIFORNIA A.PROOVING�DESIGN RE I'N FOR TRACT NO. 13541, THE DESIGN REVIEH OF BUILDING EMATIONS: AND DETAILED SITE PLAN FOR 11 OF 12_' SINGLE FAMILY LOTS OF A PREVIOUSLY APPRO`lEn TRACT MAP ON 4.42 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON SIERRA VISTA F COUNTRY DRIVE1 T ICENTIAL DISTRI T, AND V&ING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APil; 207 - 082 -01. A. Recitals. (I) Pridemark Construction has filed an application for the Design Review of Tract No. 13541 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter, the subject Design Review request is referred 0 as "the application ". (ii) on January 25, 1989, to Planning Gomnssion of the city of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting 4.9 consider the appiicatlo4 . (iii) All legal prerequisites to the aioption of this Resolution have occurred. S. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and reso.ved by tf e Planning Commission of tie City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows- 1. forthli the 1Reci Recitals, Part Aeof his Resolutf nn are facts 2. Rased upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - ref *renced meeting on January 25, 1989, including written ave oral staff reports, this C-ftission hereby spOcifically finds as follows: 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and 2. That the proposed design is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the di:,trict in wh,cit the Site is located; and 3, That the proposed design is in compliance w t) each of the applicable, provisions of the Development Cade; and 4. That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health„ safety, or welfare, or materially injuriom,s to properties or inmFroveients in the vicinity. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. OR TRACT 13541 - PRIDEMARK CONSTRUCTION January 25, 1989 Page 2 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. (1) Provide a quatrefoil within the recessed area above t'a front does on Floor Plan 795B. The design aroun4 attic vents shall be similar. (2) Citural stone shall be used on the elevations rather than a manufactured stone veneer. (3) The developer shall install any side and rear yard fencing. All side and rear yard fencing shall be masonry with a decorative cap and wails uit in public view shall be a decorative block. The final wall design shall be included on the landscape Plan and shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuancR of building permits. (4) Windows in public view shall be multi- paned. 4. The Secretary to this Comission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF JANUARY,,1989. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. C}an ATTEST: Brad Buller, 5ecratAry I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of January, 1999, by the following vote- to -Wit* �1� 11 n 11 r p`.ANNm commISSION RESOLUTION NG. OR TRACT 13541 w ?RIDEKARK CONSiRl.CTION Jahcsru 25, I989. Page 3 _ AYES: COMMISSIONERS, NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: V adtg�e'i��..«Y.AYaYw z wNyo� OO EC w!� Y^ •Y C V ■Y4��lL�T� _N q dweGCfoiNL « NYd � N w p yy +Y�LA 30.aI+1�{ LD CC 1! A iYjl. yyO S W + CLN e +LCC6A�U0. a V. AI MP ,O Oy k� O N i'YO 4a A' #pETY iks gaz iuo� LL yy .yyy.LN..M, yM1 CC �pp dG A °� O!� �Yp� - yN « d NEI Rif i1ma !bS »J� aOa N �G■{� r' Y NAG �� .=IrM° ."'^ L •.4 ^9 i` ! �! L + li9w d Csg� 6N N N ®.a �P°s pp`ass 5Mpg p�«L" &J+�„a yea G�0 y� Z� v� G ✓ O C o i� �- V a �S1 Y {�! aal+. � i� f, 1r_! It O L RUN 21 1? aJ il It Y � .4 N Fes,!' P 1 7 !e VW w « � •M Jia M�O Y IM So M S o `� V N ^ g t i! � C 1 Ea its- 2- °1 �' � L cMM M'EAy bqq ee w 9.--* i� A 11 11 Original Poor ,,_ality Yp!L�(emg= I ?$ °- s�Io a ^Fi i Y�.gr»^ ag a`4y +YyG YL« ayYt^ �' yry� »�v WOle3 °O� Tyq $o�Lpy p.. NL•'P �. DM cn °C L +«yp� '• R wC«0°.=� sNV« �Yr U i v�i L ._C,.V �L V'apYCC. r � �x�33�}TSS� 1. � Q�qpaC N TC°q .yG Oe $ Y G nq�y�� 4 °a OL � 3 r°u -s� il 1 >'�'+i' 3 a T 6' � � FL d «�1' •fin � OA a:!- L Yc »dp y. I «i OT� a -it. CpL ^ e 9.- N� gQYY M�C yY µ�ufR iN�yM� »�°H�a 'y» V pgpp} q 5gC1 : ■r3 rr�i _WWY HSTO 9 +�. TLY�pa a. /s»tT Mva -H- .:gal lw'l : ._Tam fs04a a'�'N'm air' �� e �p� (Y�j 5 Moog �.�p��INNSS ��s� $« • I � as aYV�.�I� 9Y� ■•Y �Y 6 ° Y gg• °�' lYTgM� .0� "ar�z ;al s1 ,T= .K.al HNC a u W it Tx F.1 Ost1E ..M~ Ila" gC.T.�WL N �ypt��LO •i, ' YT L y w� bill »Y V 6 _�aw SB. M��M Ng i�p- A 1 1 T75 iz.S 2 i 11 y MlyL .� ' y -TA d o rrp go�b�a'£ : sp.. +7f M Z QQ$$ q ` �3p Ys r�►/. a yT QT 9•Tp �Y .g is a�u 'tMffi . aeNO .;arLmi a I I diI 0 N as r.� L,L _� 4r' LO�4 a' O4 ! 4 YIs- a f g b'$e°,YaSns,°,v V o f T j. a` `$ 2 W ., N p IO fff c1 -LL yVOU yL y« ,� .�ap`onMV giiO g; k41' 1 �Ka p Ydw 1�iSNOG.G• N 'L` } °q mF pY�2 �fJ.S L ANN !, SASC � s'4 yyyyyyyN N4 �a+ v-LCL. �•yyyMyYµY L4 •'g�( Q. pN y]ir H C"� � OY� Ys�a�M�M 'NV _Sw �O� ■« O 0 O FS Mal f t«A. C�MiNY R f. faY «1Q rdN u, g : ;fax s. Lr �MGM f p �N AqL N!ON '4 Nr. KN yN0 ^ -.i 'CN u e 49 A O Original Poor 'Quality y ,ti' „ggLN..L p3 4w ~x� ~b i. •A i _4= r a a � V01 pp « } s.. s ooi�l�g[ NS+r ANN afoe�s ~ e e °fah. 'jr if aaSS uE 4 +R� �@yg �� g rani ��,fi >�t s s a � tial w d' 1cX M1lk ~M f s «V «f 4_� •J S fyL w3:do `03 y� N .Wdj �.Q -*jai 3 a .� ` , &4 Ili =24" ��w1gry r N • t f�r,W �i 1DN ~a1 �yL'z; CO O Nom» IL.. ter ►r, traLftor, Quality : ii o o b. i 1 1 s � 6'l S =a 1 � go Slit L� Y E� qr u 115; HS 4 L Y 9 ,y 6O f py�_ $A 1 pp pa c'S =4fy 24 pi gq« 3 sa a !qL CCG55 b.p -so~ qiq�N rCCNQQ Ola.^ «d y�� l3N ic V w.4V ~ ^^ ` r�ggOi'nC YET 2 �qr. tr SO N++ S O 1� � « � VIT N ei •• ay , COG Yy L7 tl LM C+«0.. p 0 Fes° L C W V C Y r air �qG ��yy++yypp�i iQ y Na�� a ww4 G.fi S.K6 O ra C .n aV w '>4 OL.M fvi^� L 0.:+� YY. tl q 0.YLtl a 0. Rz {Y{�� Nq�G9yyY YLy��YYO lOO' t °0.ap> F N Q a 3 6 3 M M�L 6t Z tiYL : ii o o b. i 1 1 s � 6'l S =a 1 V �•�OY u W 74 L�1 $� Z L� Y E� Sg�Y� u 115; HS 4 L Y 9 ,y 6O f py�_ $A ^ M � Hopppggr aiC.Y, pp pa c'S =4fy 24 pi gq« 3 sa a g n Ola.^ «d i Mal l3N ic V w.4V ~ ^^ ` r�ggOi'nC 62i yy cpcp �qr. tr SO N++ S O 1� � « � VIT N ei 3 yy 9 CMO yy iiw ay�� /6�w 1 > Ilk � � N wO N 3 ;y6 ° 11 }yid L 10 B`�t�� d y .w �! ] 6M 0 Z'.5 w Sill g c u � C gGpp ail ya1" N �g y�g� N :+ Ze 413 b Jza `i "J1 °� WW �iYa 1999V�V >4 �i C� yo V �•�OY u W LJCO Y $ L� Y E� Sg�Y� u LN HS 4 L Y 9 ,y 6O f 5 RL 4 0O pa c'S =4fy YN�' 7 ,•Ly V'°Yp 5tt1• :6.Q n Ola.^ «d 0. l3N ic ` r�ggOi'nC y{ yb_ N 3 yy 9 CMO N V ��yy++yypp�i iQ y '' py�p Ya` .uy i Lm O ra C .n aV w '>4 !7I � � •.j Ilk � � N wO N 3 ;y6 ° 11 }yid L 10 B`�t�� d y .w �! ] 6M 0 Z'.5 w Sill g c u � C gGpp ail ya1" N �g y�g� N :+ Ze 413 b Jza `i "J1 °� WW �iYa 1999V�V >4 { Original Poor Quality w `j ' F w� a rfi L C p L E L !1 � y,+ q4 ^W G >' w +'d" Ca yY�� ^iYY• $d: b Y. am u� O 460 Md NOM M �y> Y � 7 ^.OL be 'i C O p pp HC :$rM It ti�JC' crgf¢' SN "C�'Y Y w M N N N� G■ 0 NSN • Q� O »tl S � O C. �..'4 � L v0 VOt yQ �a� 4qy C C C. 4« N �'JpT.1�tli ^O y'C w�a85 w� °ws �i x�xi.N$ awoi$$ 5F $ a^S DLO u NrJ .` Ct ., ■ NNr �4C . 8 S 3 L stl LO� O.0 � M��L N M' N AEI e 4 `• G J9 �U °sou J3 `o $� ' u'_"i u'gi' � yy3 y` V tl 4tl CW OA ".M VO iM KMS Id C W ■yy 1-5i M ae-51 _pi rip .! 1 4^ +,: ma 2 p ` s a «jai `�a�� :spas az IN yy MM _ 4 Sj E. S ISS A rM MMt ism < - �.k' ♦M.4^ . W�y �~ g� ^* 9J �rFS � q�$y�,�s tl ga „ �a o a $ �y . ' a0% X31-1 irNo IN 7 :Na a o1 .9 A 3 drgg r e Original Poor Quality ■■ y N O C Y� Y✓ Y A a 0 �L dA 4 4 M .a'.g38, _E �Q°"iY: 3r g `o ^b +ate `�� 9 ggO� Y�H ` h vYaa� �a� w.N� Y C� w�y gY _ N � iwY• � ��4 �s eY ��. �e YiL$ � w>, u c � _ NL � �o � GNU °✓ �M �'� Y:� a �Y � � Y ✓9Y�q� C' Y' � 0� 4 a M ��inc L� `�� ^ �.N.. c� +$ ✓o sv " � � i`.YV ga. IM 3 $g b xvu g�' v2E� o �c xy♦ ^r _e o`er �M �Wy4� Yp �'` iyyL -+NCy�O �yYY` ��sC +1114 ^SQ y CV S1 dO�.M »V ^F90 �� V4� Y. Ca YY qq° ✓�.0 ieq 'L» NYC � py0 40IL itv, L�YYL Lia oOy qMm iO ^r Nyyi,`YyCOyy �f �vtl • iiiv u. Y ,C Mr. Y� ZEE 6- WM N -L i.V 3 Y chi '�i' !� � aO to Ala Q dN O N N b H .4� MI p N Y 6 N � • O �� mV Y� OV .j$' 'L'a._ -z Teo 01 Eva j Ms La C �M 1 =J w r Vo ®s g� _ 0 1r � .`3 s all 1-9 Y a as at ZL NN pw A! g Ill In IRS, dEw ,E � L.✓ ° � � N G Y 6 a6 � V. m^ ✓N 6 `J l El � L L' L Y� Fay GM Y � i.4 ^�� N�Ly p� ��.� ■.p a i?r� °�M G ��A �L.p ��- wwaPPP tp� �Y L ff�� ci ifY jC`i'u v✓i��en- .c'b'�5 o� � I N L1 C r..i W 3 6. �b O L � ° ; s O. C y C o .a o �O fO6W to ro i� j u �4b� C 2L e ss Yw �aaG L Is 2 . a7o C 9 N COL w�L + O Y O d` p� $oft b M1 I Original Poor Quality O C N SID I .N C.G pLp +b+r-ac cf O 'S�C.� n V�I.n M.O .c�IC Mv� N ♦ `tff '.� C p i M r p Y � ! b F V L Y i Y w M tl Y V Y a ti Y A C p Y Y z e rS ^ IS N I F gg N d Y N a N O zo M L9 •Q.�`L �; o. '�!. pY ffz: w� o: gig° _yYL �� w_ ■a. p�Yp1 >pex V 1j$� 6 +Lp p OV M.sQ�ai. �YG1 w,ry��¢�. �yyvyy��^y{y{ Ya. ;w Y�C (p�=,9 gN }[ ��1`^� 4QI GN e.ii �+YS B wN +i iY Y M 6. N ±f �.N aI aI 1,15&.9 EF E.M. Y w � o E I '1111 VT .[1.'2l:FVS1V LU\,..tiJ,YAVkgL7K 'Z ZIFF Avg ' ' DATE: January 25, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: C %dy Norris, Assistant Planner o U1�__} SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEq FOR TRACT 11606 -1 - EL CAPITAN DEVELOPMENT UUMPANT 1K. _ ev ear c "sirs is an and 5511ding elevations orpreviausly approved trict consisting oi` 41 single family residences on 11.3 acres of land in tine Low Residential district (2 -4 dwelling units per acre), located east of FAngo, south of Victoria Street - APR: 202 - 771 -01 throup 41. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action requested: Approval of building elevations, grading and plot pans. B. Protect Density: 3.64 dwelling units per acre. C. Surrounding land Use and Zoning: North - Existing Single Faml y, Law Density - Residential (2-4 duelling units per acre) South Existing Single Faddy; Terra Vista Planned Community Piedi= Density (4 »14 dwelling units per acre) East - New Single Family; Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West Existing Single Family; Low Density Rr 1 dential ( 2-4 dwelling units per acre) D. General Plan Designations: Fro ec lZe =`CO`w Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) North - Low Density Residential (2.4 dwelling units per acre South - Low -Madi um Density Resi der!ti al (4-8 dwelling units per acre) East - Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) U.jst - Low density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) E. Site Characteristics: Project site is currently vacant and is '56unded to Me north and east by newly constructed single family heroes, to the west by existing single family homes and to the south by the Southern Pacific Railroad. ITEM D PLANI`ING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT OR 11606 -1 EL CAPITAN DEVELOPMENT Co., INC. January 26i 1989 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The proposed project is the roosmaining phase of en a ve Tract 11606 which was originally approved in March 1981. Toe applicant is proposing to use the same archliwcture that was previously approved and built fir Tentative Tract 11606 -2, 3 and 4. The applicant is proposing a total of 3 floor plans which range in size from 1,580 square feet to 1,490 squara feet. PlzFt 2 is a single story With a 2 car garage and has two elevations while clan 3 and 4 are two story and have 3 car garages. B. Design Review Committee: On January 5, 1989 the Design Review Comm, ee""(McNieT,7o soy, Coleman) . reviewed the project and recommended approval subject to the followings 1. rlecoratove masonry walls should be returned to the house on corner tots. 2. Side yard wood fencing between homes should be treated with a water sealant. 3. Archi tectural treab)mAnt should be provided all elevations. 4. The south perimeters wall should be 6 feat high, except along 0Q eastern boundary where the wall may be 5 feet in height as necessary to ensure that total wall will not exceed an aver8ge height of 8 feet. C. Grading Committee, Tate project was reviewed and conditionally apprcv d—y fe 90ading Committee on December 30, 1988. III . FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Project is consistent with the Development Me an the MORE Alan. the project will not be detrimental to the adjacent properties or cause significant environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use and site plan together with the recommended conditions of approval, are in Compliance wiOw the applicable provisions of the Development Code and City standards. IV. R£COM ENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve a es gn Review of the building elevations and plot plan for the 102 lots though the adoption of the attached Resolution and Conditions of Approval. ty PLANNIta COWISSON STAFF REPOPT OR 11606. -1 - EL CAPITAN DEVELOW -77 CO., INC. January 25, 1989 Page 3 Resp qfuily su tted, Br Bul , r Gity nner OB:CN.mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A3 - Site Utilization Exhibit '8" - Detai l e-d Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Grading Plan Exhibit "Do a Landscape Platt Exhi h, c "E" - Wall Tian Exhibit "F" - El eVati arts Exhi bit 'G" - Floor Platt Resolution of Approval with Standard Conditions D-3 0 AST x1p =: ew-r- op/4'11/7c7l Poor day CITY OF ITEW WYkgk:,�_ 10 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: - l�._ PLANNING DIVISION -D- � EXHIBIT: SICALE: 4A i E t:; p - op/4'11/7c7l Poor day CITY OF ITEW WYkgk:,�_ 10 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: - l�._ PLANNING DIVISION -D- � EXHIBIT: SICALE: Lh Original Poor Quallit i f7 _ib 1'4LACITY OF ITEM: RANCHO CUCAMONG ;rA TITLE: JIM, t EXH NNING DIVESION D-5- NORTH origins( P ®or Quality _ f 'r J411-!4R.y-m Y� Q N)1 7 r 1 { t � b 0 CITY O PtA�4jN 1NG DIVISION Ra GIRTH ITEM: "TITLE: . . } - � . Original PQ ! . in [ � # Quality f � � � i |.- t ! | .�� • ■ �� ! . . ` | ` � -� ■| � | +| . # ! |§ H � ¥ /3 1! | ( . | t hill k A \E k |� - - � . , . ! , | � ITEW.; TITLE \ PYR|k!'r 41- 2 _I 1 : . A 9 Original Poor Quality CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ,DT _A VWTVa! T%T4T10T^'%T 7 --f ITEM: A ,D TITLE; .�.4t'L r O�OYIS iAYw M! 'on lu Original Pbor �ualit A V y i�t f 44W NORTH &TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: PLANNING DIVISION —V—� EXHIBIT-.. of—, SCALE: orig►nai Poor g n d 0 U c' a 0 0 O 0 ff !!1 �! k s CITY OF ITEM: 29mdk --/ RANCHO UCAMO 3 G A. TITLE: _ V A49� PLANNING DIVISION, Fm E m rri D _z -r r m' f�l � O n O n E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2 ITEM: TITLE; ppr��rc��,5 lW %lTl0lMM• Y ,- Qil A i T. . 0-!4 1 N, --- ik- -.,. i , . , �o o � • P b I ITY OF RANCHO CU A ONGA PT,A NTNr. lrlTVTCTANi 7--/:? ITEM: Z'RII -/ TITLE: ffEe.yhAls 10v4sB1011P. % - CAM ► Tin. '` `;ti , ; � ,' 11 Ag a d r 1 13 � B C a 0 III m CITY OF ITEM..' ` RANCHO CUCA17 ONGA TITLE: aahw __ DT_A- MWYVP'_ ra- IJTCTA' T x'1,..1 naa+aY *�arew_ 1�. n rs . s .o I TN'E KI OLI_S - TR • T 11f��r�?� EMI C NI T AN 0 IEU I _v • R1N f ` ` 7. i i • - i A CH CL,,'.',AM0NGA PLANNING DIVISION n -All VMp 4W 41 FTAI7 ID ITEM:--- TITLE:` /i�_�_. 1 zr co On O P OR =M"U'pait U. REN oil it r1a I 64ITY OF ITEM: 944*-/ RANCHO CUCAIMONGA .riTLr& 'PLANNING DIVISION P-/7 sxHiBiT:d;g3 SCALE: A i fajl D � Z � m' u � m Z 1 i r, J, J, a G CITY OF RA-NCHO CUCAMONGA i c i� !A i` s i Q ITEM 0f / Z,-r/ RESOLUTION NO. A RES00TION OF THE RANCHO CUZAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROdINA VICS01.1 REVIEW FOR TRACT NO. 11616-1 LOCATED EAST OF ONGO SOU`fH CF VICTORIA STRE4T IN THE LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL €?STRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), ARC MAKING .FINDIMS IN SUPP RT THEREOF. AP1 202 - -771 -OX THROUGH 41. A. Recitals. (i) E1 Cepittan 6;lrelopment Company, Inc. has filed an application for the Design. Review of Tract No. 11606.1 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter, the subject Design Review request is referred tows "the appiicatforr ". (ii) On January 25, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meetir� t consider the application. !-'ti) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occ-.rred. s. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is ► -ereby found, detamined and resolved by the Planning Corwhosion of the City at Rancho Cucamonga as folY'aws 1. -This Commission hereby speri €iLally find, that all of the facts set forth in the Recital,, Part A, of this Resolution are true and cor -ect. 2. Based upon b lbstantiai ovidence presented to this Cowl"ion during the above - referenced meeting on 4anuary 95, 1989„ including writty and oral staf,0 reports, thin, Coremission hereby specifically finds as follows; 1. That the proposed project Is consistent : h the objectives of the G-aneral Alan; and 2. That tip proposed design is in accord with the objective of the Oevclopment Code and tale pweposys of the district in-which the site is located-, and 3. That the ,proposed dsign is in compliance with each or the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and 4. That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicabl€ thereto, Wit not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurfo+A to properties or Improvements in the vicinity. PLASHMG COMISSION RESOLUTION NO, OR 11604 -1 - EL CAPITAN DEVELOPMEf.T CO. INC. January 25, 1989 Page 2 _ . 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Conditions: 1. Decorative masonry walls shall be returned to the house on corner lots. 2. The side yard wood fencing between hoes shall be yreated wi *,� a rater sealant. 3. Architectural treatment shalt be provided on all elevations. 4. The south perimeter wa'11 shall be 6 feet high, oxi :ept at the eastern boundary whare'the wall may be 5 feet in height as necessary t,► achieve an average wall height of 8 feet or lcss. S. The double wall is5�oje along the vast prt boundary shall be re:.olved prior to the issumme of I ermits. 6. The ppll-,ant Aall verify the structure. —;vndness of the exiliting wall which is to remain to the satisfaction of the City building inspector, otherwise the wall shall be removed and replaced. 7. All colors and materials uses? on the exterior olevations shall be consislmt with those used or, previous phase:, on Tentative Traci: 1106 .2, 3 and 4. 5. Provide landscaping thet trr gation between, sidewalk and perimeter va;l on all corner cots. 4. The Secc-stary to this ,emission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED PNF ADOPTED AM& 25TH DAY OF JAIWARY, 1989. PLANNING COMMSM.. OF THE MY OF RANCHO CUCAVNGA B' Larry T. , e , C.i.,. ATTEST: Brad M ler, secretary L:J i`':ti i PLANNING C"ISSION RESOLUTION NO. k 11606-1 EL CAPITAN DEYtLWIENT CO. INC. Janucry 26, 1999' PagG 3 I, Brat 1I«,3 er, Secre-:ary of the Planning Commission of the wit of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby, certify that tha foregoing Resolution w! , s .-'uly and, regularly introducedR .passed, and adapted ay the Planning. %Omission of the City e' Rancho CuttsvAga, at a reguiur meeting of the Planning Convission held on 11,e 15th day of January, 1989, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: CV'AISSIONERS: NOES; COMMISVONC =. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: a k R �T, Ld KY �N'�0�. +0 jMfw� JY� gOg��tlO • Y 50. `S A rr M .Y°!. w�!�0. y +!phi i0 M O'YY @Y @Y@Y1� �b HN ::pis �$ '°• °Mw.M ~(N�Y �pLS. wq }4 am y" tl`! •�^ �� i`Vay'! ..$• „��}��YGmCsY �aad6C .•C.y�i yC3�Y AIL €gg•Y� or w'y YUY`Ajyt{ . °pq��pC�NO �N��I.Y CL.�s `�jwl~bjQ 1 t IYLOp I gig 8 Hilt eg get! SSt'p1. yy p {uu� p� Pin Of v i 6 Y N N N• O at Ind N gs � g y N u ° yw y O p,M �. N y. dV D p y y ■q �{ •�y`� Y�Y�C` )OLC �YCM ti��Q$� a10� i •'OO �Y�fC1 M +L �} 8A� V'O N aa•�Yn N�yK SQ.� ' . 0 Y LL C a T. S! aII�i�s w�i N d � r b ei y633 yg N S ° A g�N T yYy ` L Y. Y �y ZZ".. e al?, lxX-a °3; it Y Y dtl � gr: S w � •°$' S �� as Pic -- L ia+ a 0 "S e�^iY z IM Original 1"vur Quafity iv •.,5' =sa �o—..to A Yi YiC23 ,G1 'gee o.TL V� r�°.i �qq C�iP ,L Hell, ^ wo Yam � � 8F y ^ 1N a a x�� v H A. �MZ sYInc- 3� 4ou ffi q.�'�•J QJ +w cor^' p=YV9y°.�w °$•�'CS:ji u'.`g$a�w�L u "SV t pycv�u,r b�V� M�4y Yt�wYM`fy� 1`A qfr ,C. aip.li oYV' V� ; �M1Y ■ =' I-N-2. vi 7ga 4yC.„ y'�:yN 9YOQ�4MaV. �iix Yg w3 iy3,�BBG N 1b:,& l it L iss" ��p ��'��_ �b~M�VS.� iCp1Y� ��C� .�j�C V p yA1ICO Cr_ .? q o�u "'�pp rs� .Y�Si'Fl #a$_�� e�q ''�L pp+'4..g�. g bi NaNCb ` 1i1 if�.� N4�w wMwMY _ a T 3 IRS �p y$ mil aml H �. C .1 Xi ~1 �I u fi �Y Io' 2 2 • qjC -b ` N ilia N b�1 �1L� `tiffs Pi.tyfy OEM ° °sap... 04 "8;�m ~TTY I r�� 0 ;p Apal !y'�� p E 11 s, 11-0 52 n list w yiall i:+ vUhl'i�1µ TL Az IN rY ��ifWp sAwO 'g,..G fGi� �cs is� • ��_m G L i t,: Y 4 N LS 4 7r .ODD 6�ggv M 1 y y ym ir0 �T U� 9...bij �� Lp�y[`N.��`� }I�� EM. Y�w�w' O N Y t i�+p. }Q�i yr. 7� n .p7xy { U L , W$M 4Q� wY V Np'ti y 44 N Ct w.��J f4 . ..» �a � MC�P S >3 • #wnu" b.N i�A 1► M¢•1. ttYU�' w4 y 6�ii pp�,rtAt �@yy � . Q �4 12, S 8i� C �N w AMU 2 ia .fQ 7332 at pyf� q . n-1? -2 1 N ,s w CL CL Original Poor Quality Y$�pn r.� r « ,,��000•••,'p �^ �o �m�QOp.�•i CSC i�¢dt q�i^.��v � ra,��' L� ^N G~ 0 �� C� Z�.�g�.tw Y.o w^ ■LL> Y q�,� rE •. ®L g ~..�9 Nr. C« M� �� Y�M 4 C„��. ..s9� wc1P. ��n u ii emu. ♦e YyMnfyy ° YC N i4a4 „H��. ov •� �L gY 3g lcj ai.'� _qua y',u' ce +brow 2- "zi-S,U -,es °I. a� .°d� �5�.. •NYL{{..��e��ii ■y y 3 94 Y Y `L�OYd." �o dip -Fig �''eo r.r \\` I" aLC s4 «� •�Yi \�.� fAL r � i�'«^ "� �}h 'w��i ME.; « [ ■�y 6'+\Y w9,• tl.��L LU ++a y�•`ryg6'{� 0�ww .�{g YSO y�;l1i�Y NCwCN tN^ 6.� Z O f iNy SwO .yCC{CCCD 46 i6� .R.Y Oa, "\ I +•1 Yf m ri m q as. r+yy� p L y«r•�'y sell, . r�" 0°yci$ °,y° Is ID It °a gps�$ + Y � ll i yyL « N. b •ybs Y 'w ap p v� _ � Li •�� p � S Vi Y u p. .11 47 V.Cy. 4 5 "W3 +P •b4 �I�i gqY+pfi+i��i •6y�ym .g. �O y sttxxLL rai� RcI .A Cya ON•N� �yp !eOA Ki b + $. SpMp q•.{r).� t ^)}Ja�,V rr. �p �•r3. M. 1gi'i;g N Us a�� CC�1Atl Y 6a e�llly4F M�� «G�gii6fl'Fy a.�f,no °a`��i� a 7i�a �sgi cu e.v �of�•c� 2 °q� <..x;� c'aSa".s�,�7�.�u°. 44 r+ ev '.c s ni vY u .i tv .: Origirj @1 t craor "� x3 ark Ziff � ^ ■yL �� Opb�j��Oa yyO�OL`$Wj Y�Y� NY»R,Wyg. ~y �1 "�, _y� Saeri 4�$ bnj Y .FFF a 9` .05 fix +j M a w 4- ps so ri. e r p eF Jo j is I 0 a� "� use j3 i W V Itl M` Ri ILS a r - N fia rn. 1 IY,Y leg SS �u w IT W 9 Original Poor Quality Js iage=' � � ►�.►+��` c�w �i S � .i �aa► q�i �.N. ,�y'., m N Z ad ;� ► ►o c x i� yy a s a z �P N M _ _ _ M •. � a � Y q�� yew �� :� � �.i a.�� A� '4 ii & � •'� � .�- �� S ..°.%a 3y(, Ell; 1; oa y ]g� 12 U1 3� h:� ► � �_N�o �� E a =� �9 II cc S. 71 } C 4.J pap P fall = `' its «g TL 1 _ a� Y } N o S}}} y 2. N t� • � .N lV fq • U1 'b Jr* '� DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND. CITY OF .RANCHO CUCAMON'GA STAFF REPORT Janvary 26, 1989 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Earrye k. Hanson, Senior Civil E6jineer Barbara Krall, Assistant Civil Engineer TIME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAF 9431 - BRIMAR INDUSTRIES - A 3iffsffon of 2.94 acres Into 4 parca s In the Very ow (2 du /ar) Development District locafiAd on the cast side of Beryl Avenue, south of Mllside Road - APH 1061- 611 -04 Tenta',ive Parcel Mnp) 9431 as shown on Exhibit "C" was initially approved by the Planning Comiission an February 12, 1986, for an initial two year period until February 12, 1988. The first of a passible throe one -year time extensions was granted on January 29, 1988, extending t: ,)proval period until Febrv3ry 12, 1989. The applicant 's nc+; requesting the second of the possible three one -year time extensions. The letter of request (Exhibit W) it attsched for your reference. RECMEWATIU: It is reccmpeAded that 'the Planning Commission adopt trio attached resolution rF;arovirg a one-year tine f %tinsion for Parcel Hap 9431. T$he new expiration date woule 'se February 12, 1990. Respectfully subizitted, fps IA4,w� Barrye R. Hanson Seenio, Civil Enz'neee BRHrBK :sjm ITEM E BLIMMa Industd RISCEIVED LNGINURING t}Ii blo January 9, 1989 City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department P.C. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 917:W (714) 989 -1852 Ref: Parcel Map #9431 Dear Barbara, i As per our phone conversation this dare, I'm formally requesting an extension of Parcel Map ,#9431 until February 12, 1989. pie (Terry Lane and myself) feel confident that wetly complete all required items prior to renewal date, but jest in case we would like an extension. You're assistlll�* in *his matter will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Troy Shoe e Project nager TS /sg F- 123 East Niwh Stmet / Up9 wd, Califon -& 91786 J (71;) 9#6.373 � �y Origlna! Poor Quality r'l &4m LIS t �weP �wat� , � ® 43 AIR • �� •. 4' ��••�►. ratte+K ...r +wwa�_a 12t .. d �� ••. +rsasrs = i p r r Asw 1 Z, 3 , 01 It r °. fm -pill �I. 1� IN1IlM!AIIW p ° fit Its le OF s. 1 i w01►ar 1 m I � . 4 0 j TMAT1VE PARCEL MAP NO. 9431 U iii. Ct1Y V COW CrcaMW vRf W W WAMISIO. VIM M C&OPSMA. / aaw e � sir w r NY. aaNw r o rro rMYf M LN P. /NY Y.:fNNi..� M/NI.tYI/ lr. tl NT � ti tof W"m Foam I. In Original Foot Quail 0 �YL Flit,. 3 YL 9VCEL Crff 0 RANCHO CUCAMONGA ZNOWEEMG DATMON 9' YL 2 YL YL !3 1 ' lil RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTIOM OF THE RANCHO rUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING +.1 TIME EXTENSIOti FOR PARCEL MAP 9431, LOCATED ON 'HE EAST SIDE OF 3Ea"L AVENUE, SOUTH OF HILLSIDE ROAD, AND MAKING FINDINSa" rh SUP ORT THEREOF • APN 1061 - 611-04 WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extension for the above - described project, pursuant to SC( ;tion 1.601.6.2 of Ordinance 28 »B, th (< Subdivision Ordinance, and WHEREAS, the Piann ;ng Commission conditionally approved the ' above- described tentative parcel map on February 1?, 1986 SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has mde 74. the following A. That current economic, maeketing, and inventory conditions make it unreasonable to buil -! �t this time. B. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expiratiom,; would not be (rsistent with the intent of the Development Goee. C. That them have been no significant changes to the char,cter of the area in Alch the project is located thst would cause the ,project to became noncorfowming or incosistent with c'drrert standards. SECTION 2: The rancho Cacamonp Planning Comicsion t ireby y_uts a —ioH time extens tor; Parcel Map Applicant Expiration 9431 Briamr Inddstries February 12, 1990 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF if'jARY, 1989.. PLANNING COMMISSIOU OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA14 1GA BY, Carry . Nei , , a,! rman ATTEST: ra u erd ecratary —` PLANNING COHkl5 OR RFS -OLI T` ON NO. PARCEL MAP 9431 - BRIMAR INDUS'.RIES JANUARY 25, -I;q9 PAGE 2 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Cormissirn of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the for=going Resolution was .duly and regularly introdur -J, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a ragular meeting of the Planning Comsissio:i- held on the 25th day of January, 1989, by the following vot`µto -wit: AYES: COMWISS10NEP : NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: CJNMISSIONERS: (701.02 o1 -"25- 9 PC Agenda CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA � ouCAA1p % G ' M M YRAD i ' s n O O� F_ r Z j, DATE: January 25, 1989 �e7z TO: Chairman and vambers' -of the Planning Co,,missior. FROM: Tom Grahn, Assistant Planne SUBJECT: DR 88 -26 SMITH Staff recoy.mtends this item bfi continued to March 8, 1989 Planning Commission meeting, with the consent of the applicant, to further addiess design issues. These deign issues will be reviewed at the March 2, 1989 Design Review Committee meeting. TG:mlg January 25, 1969 Ms. Qynthia Kinser City of Rancho Cucamonga Planniv%R Department P.O. Esau 807 Rancho emparnonga, California 9;'730 RP: Cofditional Use Perrn'.t 88 -48 Egghead University Dear Cynthia: This letter will serve as vio•tict,� that' Rancho Associates is withdraevinn the applicatio+o °ar the conditional use Permit 068-48. 1 want the thank you for all t.° your time and consideration during this process. If you have any questions Or need additional infor,nation, please do not h0sitatra to call rite at the number shown below. Sincerely, oath ndstedt Pro y Manager for . 'no Associates eta Gx 27405 Puena Real, Suite 3W Mission Viejo, CA 92681 a (714)643-588a 2001 BE d A111103 NOISStW WOa:i ei • t i ea. sa Nur ! <' t DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CIT" OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Y STAFF REPORT January 25, 1989 Chairman and fiemLcrr of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Cynthia S. Rinser, Assistant Planner classroom ana office in a leased space 1,000 within an existing multi- tenant industrial p acres of land in the Haven Avenue Overlay Dist at 9170 - 9190 Maven Avenue. APN: 209- 262 -17 I. BACKGROUND: This item was continued '1om� the January 11, 1989 Planning ommission meeting at the appl, ,.nt's request (see Exhibit "A ") . As of the writing of this report, the applicant has not requested any n difica.tion to this appl'catioa. Refer to the previous staff report (Exhibit "B ") for discussion of this item. II. RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the previous analysis, staff has the o ow ng op ons for the Planning Conn.ission: 1. Continue Conditional Use Permit 88 -48 for thirty days in order for the applicant to prepare a parking demand study, or 2. Deny Conditional Use Permit 88 -48 through adontion of the attached Resolution of Denial. Res ully tte d e i' City anner BB:CK:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant Exhibit "B" - Planning Commission Staff Report January 11, 1989 Resolution of Denial ITEM G January 11; t9a9 Ms. Cynthia Pins2r 9380 Baseline P. G. Box 807 Raycno Cucamonga, Califot'.+ia 91730 RE: Egghead University Dear Cynthia! Per our conversation, Rancho Asa cciat'as request that the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Comaiisis cn issue a continuance for the conditional use pmrmit tSS-44 University. Your consideration in this matter im greatly zppreriat,zd and if you have any questions, phase? too not hesiltacte to call me at the number shown, below. -aincerely, Cathy dstedt propar Manager For Pancho Associates ism 2740 Iftions Fkztti, Suits 300 « �Minion V16jo. CA 92691 (714) 643 -SM CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT .ATE: January 11, 1989 TO: Chairman and.liembers of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad SW',Ar,, City Planner BY: Cyw is S. Kinser, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PONDIiIONAL USE PERMIT 88 -48 e regves comer c as-T srcom a-W ce In a leased space 1,000 square feet within an existing multi - tenant industrial park on 4.01 acres of land in the Haven Avenue Overlay District located at 9170 - 9190 Haven Avenue. , APN: 209- 262 -17. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a non- construction. Conditional Use Permit to establish an office and computer classrooe: within an existing multi- tenant industrial center on the so+Athwest corner of 7th Street and Haven Avenue. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning :_ Ao'rth R In us r a Flings, Industrial Park* South - Multi - Tenant Buildings and Vacant; Industrial Park East Vacant; Industrial Park West - Distribution Center; Industrial Park C. General Plan Designations: ro ec Sirie-°'Industrial Park North - Industrial Park South - In6istriai Park East - Industrial Park West • Industrial Park D. Site Characteristics: The project is developed with an existing mu - nan industrial center. PLANNING COMMISSION SlWv REPORT CUP 88 -48 --EGGHEAD UNIQR81TY January 11, 1989 Page 2 _ E. Parkinq Calculations: —` Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Building1 erony s 'Deli 1,200 1 /100 12 5 Advanced Data Prod. 2,160 1/250 9 9 State Farm Insurance 1,050 1/250 5 5 Plaza Travel 1,048 11250 5 5 Austin, Cooper and 1,548 1/250 7 7 Price Insurance Thomas Temporaries 943 11250 4 4 Temps R Us Vacant 1,290 7,281 1/250 1/250 6 30 5 30 Proposed Egghead ' University Office 194 1/250 1 4 Classroom 3 employees 1/ employee 3 0 12 students 1/3 students 4 0 Building 2 Healtn W1 b 18,270 1/150 122 88* Build_ing� 3 Haven medFcal 7,580 111WO 38 31 Trans American Insur. 1,995 1/250 10 10 Norris -Repke 1,000 1/250 5 5 Vacant 7,695 1/250 31 31 Total my 7W* *Nete: Commission approvod shared parking concept for health club. F. Applicable Regulations: The Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea aflows c raining as a Personal Service use subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Comission. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The classroom and office use will operate Monday through Saturday from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 P.M. 'there will be a maximum of three employees and twelve students (see Exhit't RAN). B. Issues: The primary issues related to locating this type of use within an industrial setting are compatibility to the surrounding businesses and parking availability. There are a _I1 PLANNING COWISSION S ,F REPORT CUP 88 -48 m EGGHEAD UNIVERSITY January 11; 1989 Page 3' - _ variety of uses within the center and compatibility problems are not expected. The Development Code requires one parking space per 250 square f,et of office use. For classroom uses one parking space is required for every employee and one for every 3 students. This proposal for 194 square feet of office area with 3 employees and twelve students will require eight parking spaces. There are only four parking spaces provided for this unit. This results in a deficiency of four parking spaces. Further, within the center there already exists a deficiency of parking spaces. Due to the high percentage of vacant space, there does not appear to be a parking problem on -site. Currently, 15,976 square feet of space (30%) is vacant. Staff has recommended the applicant - prepare a parking 'demand study prior to consideration of any use with a more intensive parking demand. The Foothill Fire Protection District has reviewed this application and would require tenant improvement plans to be IF submitted to the District prior to occupancy. C. Environmental Assessment: Upon review of Part 1 of the Initial Study and completion of art 2 of the Environmental Checklist, staff has found no significant impacts related to a classroom use locating within this Industrial Park. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Commission must make all of the following n ngs nor er approve this application. Staff cannot make the following findings: 1. The proposed use is in accordance with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes cf the Industrial Specific Plan subarea in which the site is located. 2. the proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in e a T —Re ort newspaper, the property posted, and notices sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the property. G ��- 'LARNI, C" IIrG�f+ a CUP 88-48 �;,�CH�C p F'f REPORT January 11-- i roG aR5BT3� Page 4 �°• nrrak; pii vas for�ihe Atannfng Commaa s ona7ya;$ ba n, I, Continue Condi a Staff s the tianaT Use peymIt applicant to prepare 2. De a Perking demand study, fn order for the r!i' Conditfanai or attached RQSOtution 5� Permit ��., adeLrDenial. 48 through adoption of the y itt BBrCK:m1g AttechmeRts; exhibit ' Rxhibi `letter Pram A Exhibf t wCa F'F� P7an PP7 cant Resolution g f r Alert � 1)enia7 E December 12, 198b 3700 S. Susan Street, Suite 130 a Santa Ana, CA 92704 (714) 587 -7800 City of Rancho Cucamonga Department of Community Development Planning Commission c/o Ms. Sr -ah McAfee Cushman 6 Wakefield of California 701 N. Haven Ave, #300 Ontario, CA. 91764 Dear Sirs: As requested in your "Cheek'List for a Conditional Use Permit ", ilem B.4., this letter will explain the proposed use of a suite in the existing structure known as Haven Plaza, located at 9170 -9190 Haven Ave. Egghead University, a service of Egghead Discount Softw^re, conducts sustructor led classroom education for adult users of micro ewiputers. A twelve student classroom with a small lobby /office will be in operation Monday through Saturday, from Sam to 9pm. A maximum of three (3) employees will be housed in this facility. Our typical student i3 a corporate employee or executive. Currently employees from the City of Rancho Cucamonga attend our classes in our Santa Ana facility. Lockheed Aircraft Service Co. is also a valued client that sends it's staff to the Santa Ana facility. Our ability to serve the people of the Inland Empire is paramount to our eoutInued growth in Southern California. Our reason for wishing to lease a suite in this particular building is due to several factors, including: - Freeway accessability - Deli on site - aring availability, Available signage General maintenance a appearance of the facility Main street visaoility Agreiable hours of operation with the property owner I hope this letter has adequately addressed the appropriate issues for you to issue our permit so that we may act quickly to ready this space for our clients. Please do not hesitate to contact me for further information. Sincerely, tj &-c4h.'re, J e Yynn Towne strict Manager Egghead University 41 4V �N"►VENT6d �-�, 'ell frv� s 9—e 11 1 �f i I I ` j E NORTjI ITEM. 8E3 -qa Rx,fflj34 3 e =- - -mss.. sVtiLL' '.' r RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88 -48 FOR A CLASSROOM AND OFFICE IN A LEASED SPACE OF 1,000 MUARC FEET WITHIN AN EXISTING MULTI - TENANT PARK. Gti 4.01 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED IN THE HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DIStRICT (SUBAREA 6), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 209- 262 -17. A. Recitals, (i) Eg9head University has filed an application for the issuance of the Conditional U3e Permit No. 88 -48 a,� described in the tiv a of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use tirmit request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On the 11th of vanuary, 1989, and continued on January 25, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Ceervonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing an the application and concludes said hearing on that dace. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NON, THEREFORE, it is hereby founds detemined and resolved by to Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Basr` upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the aboveerenced public hearing an January 11, 1989, and January 25, 1989, incluting written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Cow d ssion hereby specifically finds as !,ollows; (a) The application applies to property located at 9170 - 9190 Haver. Avenue with a street frontage of 334 feet and lot depth of 307 feet and Is presently improved with multi- tenant industrial park; and 240 parking spaces of 9 x 19 °, and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is industrial buildings, the property to the south of that site consists of multi - tenant buildings and vacant land, the property to the east is mlti- tenant industrial and vacant, and the property to the west is distribution center. (c) That the proposed use requires eight parking spaces, of which only four spaces are provided. Gr /U PLANNING COWISSION RESOLUTION No. CUP 88 -48 EGGHEAD UNIVERSITY January 25, 1989 Page 2 - 3. Based upon the substan;.al evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth I. paragraph I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is not in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in�lhich the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, will be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use does not comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in pargrap.; I, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby denies the application. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1989, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: arry T. Mc-Niel, CRairman ATTEST: Wad Buller, Secretir y I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of January, 1989, by the following vete »tobwit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COW - ISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMNTSSIONERS: �l —`—` CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: January 25, 1989 tss TO, Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FRO!I: Toga 8rahn, Assistant Planne � SUBJECT: DR 88-26 - SMITH Staff recommends this item be continued to lurch 8, 1989 Planning Commission meeting, with the consent of the applicant, to further address design issues. These design. issues will be reviewed at the March 2, 1989 Design Review Committee meeting, AIL T6:rtl g i i e l _-;- -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA curc>,yc STAFF REPORT F z DATE: January 25, 2989 U� > 19 ;'7 TO: 0airman an'; Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dino Putrino, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 89 -OIA - reques o amen a General an art se ti'rom esidential (2 -4 gelling units per acre) to Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 gelling units per acre) for 4 acres of land located at the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Vintage Drive - APR: 225 - 253 -47. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT WM - A request to amend tni. eve opmen s ri c ai'p' rlom- 7w Residential (2 -4 d4w0Ting units per acre) to Law - Medium Residential (4-8 dwell; ^y units per acre) for 4 acres of land located at the southeast coy^ ^„._ of Milliken Av, -ie and Vintage Drive - APR: 22S- 252 -47. I. SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Sueroundi rg Lana Use an.`. Zoning: North - Single Family Residential; Law Residential South - "Acant; Low Residential and Freeway Right -of -Way East - Single Family Residential; Low Resi deFIti al West - Single Family Residential under consf,ruction; Low Medium and P <,edium Residential B. General Plan Designations: Project. Site - Low Residential North - Low Residential South - Low Residential East - Lira Residential West - ;.ow- Medium a: ld Medium Residential C. Site Characteristics: lie subject site is four (4) acres of an approximately e g (6) acre parcel and vacant (no structures). This site slopes approximately five percent (5%) to the southwest and cim0sts of small gullies with a 7'ro °gge quantity of boulders :,nd natural brush and shrub (no treas). Landscape and irrigation improvements are in place within the ITEM H,T PLANNING WNISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 89 -DIA a DDA 98 -08 - PITASsi Januay.t 23,_ 1989 Page 2 right -of -tray (parkway areal along Vintage Drive. The Foothill Freeway right -of -way is located approximately 350 feet south of .he subject site. II. BACKGROUND: The subject site, hereinafter referred to as "the site", is -a parcel which was annexed to the City as a part of the " Caryn" annexation, but not a part of t` . Caryn Planned Comunity Development Plan. According to the applicant of the -innexation, the long term intended use of the site was a church and /or .:hurch related facility. III. ANALYSIS: Gens-ral: The applicant has informed staff that they intended land use site is a congregate care facility. I;, addition, the applicant intends to develop a church directly south of tk— site. In order for the City to ccisider a congregate care faci , the site must be zraed, at the minimum, ivw- Medium R., _sential (proposed land use designation) since a congregate care use is not permitted or conditional) }r permitted in the Low Residential District (current land use designation). Further, this type of land use requires the filing And processing of a Conditional Uze Permi t. The applicant has agreed to conduct a neighborhood maeting to address conce —.s, however, this meeting was not held prior to the writing of 0 taff report. -%ouid this meeting take place prior to the Janu t:9 Planning Commission meeting, all comments fe m the nei, A meeV.ng will be presented at the Commission meeting. Land Use Designation Compatibility: The proposed land use designation. ore, F�ea1ua� es , en a (LM), is in keeping with "residential" land uses, however, may not be in keeping with the immediate surrounding Low Residential (L) single family detached aid use character. Single family detached home design is allowed in both the L and LM districts. However, the LM district also permits an attached housing project (not permitted in the L dis'•ict) which, in staff's opinion, would be Inconsistent: with surrounding development for the following reasons: 1. The long temr, Planned development concept for the subject site and the general area is low density trad+tioriai single family detached product. 2. The Caryn project is strictly single family detached style homes. PLANNING C"ISSION SiA€h REPORT GPA 89 -OIA & DDA 88 -08 - PITASSI January 25, 1989 Page 3 The LM district wou'm further allow the following other conditionally permitted uses which are not allowed in the L district: Cone. scent Center F Residential Care Facility The site is bounded by major road-jays to the west (Milliken Avenue) and sclth (foothill Freeway and Highland Avenue rights -of -way). It is staff's opinion that these roadways set the primary causes why the subject property and '.is eventual development must ,,elave most closely to the pattern of development set in the Caryn Planned Community so as to maintain the cohesiveness of existing Icnd uses and neighborhood character in this area. Though the property to the west of Milliken is currently designated LM, as is the development south of the proposed freeway and Highland Avenucr (victoria Planned Cemmunity), these sites were of a size that allowed for a greater degree of master planning. The subject property is only four (4) acres and it is unlikely that a housing project on tini_ property could provide the same degree of neighborhood open space as that afforded in victoria or the new project to the west currently under construction. Further, re- zoning small areas o? i -nd, such as the subject site, would be considered "spot zoning" and a poor planning practice. Intended Land Use Compatibility: It should be noted that approval of this neraT--Pian a -Development District Amendment does not guarantee the development of the intended congregate care facility. If this land use designation change was approved and the congregate care facility was not developed, then it is very probable that a 4 to 8 dwelling unit per acre attached housing project could be developed. This type of development could be out of character with existing or proposed development to the north, east and west of the site. Consideration of the intended care facility shiuid be sens'tive to the primary users of the intended use which will be senior citizens. For examp',e: a congregate care facility, tike a senior housing project, shou d be of close proximity to a shopping center which incorporates convenient Mores and /or services such as a supermarket, beauty and barber shops, restaurants, banks, etc. Currently, the site is not in close proximity to such a center nor can it be guaranteed that this type of center will be in puce and /or agerationai at the time the intended congregate care facility is developed. In the event that adequate transportation service be provided to local shoppinq centers which incorporates those stores mentioned earlier, does not give the opportunity for the facility's tenants to preferably and conveniently walk to #'T 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 89 -OIA & DDA 88 -08 - PITASSI January 25, 1989 Page 4 the center. There are other potential areas in the City in which this type of facility would be more suited. Conclusion: In conclusion, the proposed amendments do not follow generally accepted land use patterns, but instead change the lower density traditional single family detached concept of potential development north of Highland Avenue and east of Milliken Avenue. Therefore, the proposals are not in keeping with the surrounding land use development. TV. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has reviewed the Initial Study and completed tffe nv ronmental Ckecklist, Part II and based on the applicant's information, the proposed General Plan and Development District Amendm-ants stould have no significant adverse environmental impacts -, Fawwever, the seismicity documentation submitted is gerer?i anu o, u sufficient to make the environmental documentation cwiplete so as to consider increasing the land use intensity. V. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: General Plan Amendment 89 -01A and Development Dis rict mein ent, 88 -08 wi,1 be detrimental to the adjacent properties as evidenced by the change in development design character documented in this report. Should the Commission determine that the amendment would not promote the land use goals and purposes of the General Plan, the following findings must be mode for denial: A. That the subject property is not suitable for the multiple family attached housing uzes permitted in the proposed land use /district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing laved useldistricts in the surrounding area as evidenced by th3 change of design character to an area where the single family detached housing is already well established; and B. That the proposed amendments are not in conformance with the General Plan as evidenced by tFe increase of density in an area where the lower density tra�itional single fawd ly detached leng term concept is planned. VI. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The "Da Ty Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices sent�o'aT(- prooe'r£y owners within 300 feet of the project site. VI. RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds no compelling reasons to support this request. erefore, the attached Resolutions recommending denial of General Plan Amendment 89 -01A and Development District Amendment 88 -08 to the City Council have been provided for the Plannir,g Commission adoption, Should the Planning Commission, after careful review of this staff report and other public testimony infoFirR on, PUNNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 89 -OIA & DDA 88 -08 PITASSI January 25, 1989 Page 5 choose to consider other alternatives other than denial of these amendments, it is recommended that the Coarillssion direct the appiica;it to provide more specific seismicity studies to perform an accurate environmental review and make an environmental 2t'termi nati on a Respectfully submitted, Brad Bu ler Cite Planner BB.DP:ko Attachments: Exhibit "A" Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" - Development District Amendment Map Resolutions of Denial I Vicinity Ma L _�a C Ceryn Planned Dev. (Existing) Single gamily f Residences 2 -+i D.U. /Acre ® ( Dev. Dist.; "9: ( inder Constructlon) Sings Family 'Resid ®noes t 4 -8 A.U. /Acre i Dev, Dist: 'LM'- Future R.r /.W. Vintage Drive >--10"0, Caryn planned Dev. (Existing) .Single,Esmiiy Residences Dev. �€tistr '� t I Future Freeway R.O.W. Highland Avenue NORTH ANk o dITY if ITEM: �. RANCHO CUCAMONGA 'TITLE: �r to PLANNING DIVISION /f --j-7 EXHIBIT :aL SCALE: . 3UBJECT PROPERTY (Proposed) • Dev. Dist. ?LrM° z C (Existing) Dev. Dist.: p r a • ac (Existing) Dev. Dust. :'L' >--10"0, Caryn planned Dev. (Existing) .Single,Esmiiy Residences Dev. �€tistr '� t I Future Freeway R.O.W. Highland Avenue NORTH ANk o dITY if ITEM: �. RANCHO CUCAMONGA 'TITLE: �r to PLANNING DIVISION /f --j-7 EXHIBIT :aL SCALE: . RESOLUTION NO. A rMt)L TION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CT-Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDP_-, OENik OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (GP,A) '40. 89 -01A, REQUESTING TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM LOW RESIDENTIAL (2 -4 D1cCLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 4 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND VINTAGE DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 225 - 251 -47 A. Recitals. (i) Pitassi Achitects has filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. 89 -01A as described in the title of this Resolution.. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred tows "the application ". (ii) Or. January 2:, 1989, the planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. (iii) All legal prerequisites o the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, TN I'AVORE, it is hereby fuund, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby sp= cifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A ", of this Resolutiorr are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on January 25, 1989, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a) The application Applies to approximately 4 acres of land, basically a rectangular, configuration, located at the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Vintage Drivo and is presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as Low Residtntial; and b) The property to the north of the subject site is designa,,ed Low Residential and is developed (single family residential). The property to the east is designated Low Residential and is developed (single family residential). The property to the west is designated Low Medium :Residential and is currently being developed (single family residential). The property to the south is designated Low Residential and is undeveloped; and A PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. GPA 89 -01A - PITASSI January 25, 1989 AftL Page 2 c) This amendment does conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and would not provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d) This amendment does not promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Eie.ndent, and 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set: forth In paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: all That the subject property is ,pt suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of acc :s, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and General plan. b) That the proposed amendment is not in conformance with the 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. 5.- Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs. 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Comrnission.hereb�! resolves that pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Goverment;, Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Kincho Cucamoviga hereby`reconmends denial on the 25th day of January, 1989, General Plan Amendment No. 89 -01A. 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF Ji4MUARY, 1989, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANOW BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Wad Buller, secretary f %jy PLANNING COWISSION RESOLUTION NO. vPA 89 -OIA - PITASSI January 25, 1989 Page 3 1, Brad Bul7er, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, co hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meet/ ng of the Planning Commission held f on the 25th day of January, 1989, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: CO WSSIONERSs NOES: COWL ISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: El Ll RESOLUTION! NO. A REAUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECCriMENDING DENIAL OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT (DOA) NO. 88 -08 REQUESTING TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP FROM LOW RESIDENTIAL (2 -4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW MEDIU14 RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 4 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND VINTAGE D.. ^.IVE RANCHO CU-AXNGA, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THERE:" - APN: 225 - 251 -47 A. Recitals. (i) Pitassi Architects has filed an application for Development District Amendment No. 88 -08 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On January 25, 1989, the Planning Commission of t_`_Q City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows; 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A ", of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based jinon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- reerenced public hearing on January 25, 1989, including written and oral staff reports, togethtir with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a) The application applies to approximately 4 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located at the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Vintage Drive and is presently undeveloped. Sand property is currently designated as Low Residential; and b) The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Residential and is developed with single family detached dwellings. The property to the east is designated Low Residential and is developed with single family detached dwellings. The property to the west is designated Low Medium Residential and is currently under construction with single family detached dwellings. The property to the south is designated Low Residential and is undeveloped; and 0 PLANNING COMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ODA 88 -48 - .PITASSI January 25, '1989 Page 2 = ' - 11 c) This amendment does not conflict wit:: the Land Use Policies of the General Plan 4,nd would not provide for development, within the district, in a manner 'consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d) This amendment does not promote the geaals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and a) This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant irpact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Baked upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs i and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a) That the subject property is not suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing lance use in the surrounding area; and b) That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment and /or the surrounding properties; and c) That the proposed amendment is not in conformance with the General Plan. 4. This Covauission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered for compliance with the. California Environmental Quality Act of 19/0. 5. Based upon the findings arid conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this �_ omission hereby resolves that pursuant to Section 65850 to 65355 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recoammends denial on the 25th day of January, 1989, Development District Amend _,nt No. 88 -08, 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. ,/ -/, T__/ 2- 0 PLANNING'COMMISSION PISSOLUTION ODA 88 -08 - PITASSI January 25, 1989 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1989. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry . e , a rman ATTEST: Efrad BUTTem, &Acre ry--- I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adoprip-A by the Planning Commission of the City of Ran6o Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held G on the 25th day of January, 1989, by �te following v(46 —to -grit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONMS: 0 ABSENT: COMMISSIGULns: 24 JANUARY 1989 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION LIONS PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA COMMISSIONER BLAXMEY commissionER CHITIEA COMMISSIONER SNERICK COMMISSIONER 14CNXEL COMMISSIONER TOLSTOY SUBJECT ' REQUEST FOV DENIAL ap SECTION VI, PARAGRAPH H AND I ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT F9-01A - PITASSI, MID ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DIS'fRICT AMENDMENT 38-08 - PITASSI REF4RENCZ : CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA COMMISSIONERS, TRZ UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF THE VINTAGE HIGHLANDS DEVELOPMENT, REQUEST DENIAL OF THE EUV4RONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 09-OIA - PITASSI, AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 88-08 - PITASSI. IT IS THE OPINION OF THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS, THAT REMOVAL OF THE LOW RESIDENTIAL REQUXRVMENT IN FAVOR OF THZ LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENT WOULD FURTHER IMPACT COMM INITY USE OF ITS LIMITED RESOURCES. SECONDLY, MAJOR COWCEUN EXISTS IN THAT THIS AREA NOT BE ALLOWED TO CONTAIN APARTMENTS, DUPLEXES, 'CONCOMINIUMS, TOWNHOUSES OR THE LIKE, BUT CONTZVUB TO PIXLEOT THE VALUES INTRINSIC WITH THE SINGLE FAMILY DWULLINGS FOUND IN THE DEVELOPMtRNT. THE BUILDING PLZ14 FOR THE VINTAGE HIGHLANDS IS A COMMUNITY OF SINGLE- FAMILY HOMES ADHERING TO THE LOW-RESXDENTIAL REOUIREMBNT. THE COMMON THEME VOR THIS COMMUNITY IS ONE OF OPENNESS WHICH PROVIDEa AN OVERALL FOCUS AND COMMUNITY IDENTITY, THE ADDITION TO, OR THE PROXIMITY or A POTENTIAL LOW-M4DIUH RESIDENTIAL ARZA TO THE VINTAGE HIGHLAND DEVELOPMENT IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH THE DESIRE$ OF THE CURRENT RESIDENTS. POTENTIAL INCREASE IN THEFT, DURGLARw, NARCOTICS TRAFFXCING AND DEGRADATION or PROPERTY VALUES ARZ USUALLY SEEN 17HERE P;PARTMENTS/DUPLSXES EXIST. THE ESTABLISHMENT OF SUCH A OSVELOPMENT 13 NOT WARRANTED AND WOULD NOT BE ACCEPTAULE TO THE VINTAGE HIGHLAND COMMUNITY. THE HOMEOWNERS FEEL THAT, AS A WHOLE, REMOVAL OF THE LODI-RESIDgHTIAL R90VIREMENT WOULD DR DETRIMENTAL TO THE DEVELOPMENT AND REQUEST THE PLAN NOT BE AMR%DED TO ALLOW THE LOW-HEDIUM RESIDENTIAL REQkIREMENT. SINCERELY, VINTAGE H104LMDS HOMEOWNERS .., ~ , r':omAmUao ------- AnDsoaa - ' --�-��-_=-_-_----�^~=`-_-- Akdli Y. --_----'_-_------------_-- ' OnLI � --------------------------- SIGNATURE ADDRESS t • �' _- ,�; �� - - - -- ..Lr�.3 -.� f �«- �,?i�LL 1�G � G� 7h6% ---- CIT'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AVA STAFF REPORT �J IdR DATEr TO: FROM: 6Y: SUBJECT: j i a to � O � January 25, 1989 0 �> Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission � Brad Duller, City Planner 1 Jeff Gravel, Assista Planner ENVI&ONMENTAL ASSES( , AND GENERAL PLAN ARENOMENT 89 -018 - WILLIAW LVD17MM A request to amen d --tw-o--$fte-s_-_--oTf e I and use wp of e General Plan within the Victoria Graves (west of MlMen an 9.3 acres) and Victoria Vineyards (east of Milliken on 12.9 acres) Villages of the Victoria Corrantunity Plan located on the southeast and west cerrzers of Highland and Milliken Avenues. The roquest proposes the changing of designations from i+19dium -H1gh Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) to Y- fghborhood Coamliocial on the east site and neighborhood CoRwe- „vial to Lew- Medium Residential (4-8' dwelling units per acre) an the west side - APN: 227 - 011 -22, 202 - 211-18. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESaSWNT AND VICTORIA COWUNITY PLAN AMMMEA e - LYON CUMM AY-A ” reques o amp e -land use es gna c ^s w n e ctoria Groves (crest of Milliken on 9.3 acres) and Victoria Vineyards least of Milliken ors 12.P acres) Villages of the Victoria Community Plan located on the southeast and west corners of Highland and Milliken Avenues. The request proposes the changing of land use designations from Medium -High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) to Reighberhood C ercial on the east si tz and Neighborhood Cttimerci al to ,ov Nedi um Residential (4 -8 dwelling unite pier acre) on the west side - APN: 227- 011 -22, 202- 211 -48. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North Cxisting Highland Avenue, future Foothill Freeway corridor. South - Existing vacant land zoned for Medium -High Residential (14 -2v dwelling units per acre) to the west of Milliken and - Medium Residential (0 -14 dwelling units per to the east. ITEM J,k PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 89- 018 /VCPA 89 -01 WILLIAM LYON January 25, 1989 Page 2 IJ East - Existing vacant land zoned for Low- Meditrrs: Residential (4 -3 dwelling units per acre). Vies - Existing single family residential, Law - Medium Residential, approved at 5.5 dwelling units per acre. B. General Plan Oesignations: Project Site - Neighborhood Commercial, a 9.3 acre site to the west of Milliken Avenue and Medium -High Residential 12.9 acres (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) to the east. North Foothill Freeway Corridor, just north of Highland Avenue. South - Medium -Nigh Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre), East - Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units Fir acre) West - FIedium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) C. Site Characteristics: The project sites are currently vacant and so are We surrounding parcels except to the west where single family dwelling units have bean developed. Both sites have frontage on Highland and Milliken Avenues. According to the Victoria Community Plan, both sites will have street right - of -ways on a' "c sides. II. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has completed the "Initial Study an revieweL the Environmental Checklist, Part II of the Initial Study, and has found no significant adverse environmental impacts to occur as a result of the proposed General Plan ftendrent 89 -01B and Victoria Community Plan Amendment 89 -01. It is anticipated that any potential of vehicular impacts may be successfully mitigated at the development project level. I11. BACKGROUND: On November 17, 1988, General Plan Amendment 88 -03E now 59-ell-was resubmitted after being withdrawn, by the applicant on October 14, 1988. On July 15, 1988 when the project was first submitted, the app': cant proposed switching land use designations between the two sites, Medium -High Residential to Neighborhood Commercial, on the easel site and Neighborhood Coiiimerciai to Medium - High Residential on the west site. However, because of great opposition from the residents in the Victoria Groves Community, because of the possibility of a apartment complex development, the applicant lowered the proposed PLANNING COMIMISSION S'T'AFF REPORT GPA 89- 0181YCPA 85 -01 - WILLIAM LYON January 25, 1989 Page 3 densit47 from Medium -Hfgh to Medium Residential. The applicant's proposal still received heavy opposition during the September 28th Planning Commission meeting, but was recommended for approval by the Planning Cormissi, r to City Council on :October 19th. However, prior to the public "searing at the City zouncfl, the applicant withdrew the proposal on October 14, 1998. On November 17, 1988, the William Lyon Company resubmitted the proposal. The proposal is basically the same except the Residential Density being proposed on the west site has been reduced to Law- MTediwn Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre). On Monday, December 12, dim Bailey of the William Lyon Company hosted a meeting at his h(±me with approximately 15 residents attending. The ,content of the meeting was the new proposal submitted on Noveitiber 17th, The outcome of the meeting was the support of the residents attending for the William Lyon Company's new proposal. IV. ANALYSIS: Staff has reviewed the application and found that the proposal is In conformance with the General Plan. As indicated . above, the land uses prnoosed on the two sites will not intensify the land use in the a.A or harm the potential character of the adopted Victoria Community Puns. In addition, the proposed land uses are appropriate for the area as indicated by the General Plan land use policies which state: "Neighborhood Commercial incl'udea shopping centers, and convenience commercial clusters that provide essential retail goods and sarvices to the residents or occupants in the immediate vicinity. ", and The Lcm Nedium designation land use policy states, "This category would be appropriate within low density areas to enctuezge greater housing diversity without changing the single- famil- character of the surrounding residential character ". V. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: General plan Amendment 89 -018 and Victoria ammun y an ndment 8802 will not be detrimental to the adjacent properties or cause sigd'ificant adverse environmental impacts. Should tiie Commission determine that the Amendments would promote the land use goals and purpose of the General Plan, the following findings may be rude for approval: A. The subject properties have both been found suitable for the intended use proposed by the Amendment. X —S PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 39- 01BfVCPA 89 -Ot - WILLIAM LYON January 25, 1989 Page 4 B. The intended usesi', have been found compatible with the surrounding areas in arms of access, vehiclel,edestrian circut'atioa, and intensity. C. The proposed Amendment will not have any adverse environmental impacts that cannot be mitigated. D. The Amendment is in conformance with the goals and � objectives of the General Plan. VI. CORRESPOW,SNCE: This stem has been advertised as a public hearing n�TFie ',,a!1y Re ort newspaper, the property posted, and notices send atl property owners within .,DO feet of the project site. In addition, residents that have attended the previous community meeting on Soptember 20, 1988 and the t -ecent meeting of Derember 12, 1988 have also been notified. VII. RECOMMENDATION• Staff rec!a+r2 ;,x;s that the Planning C,aaeaission aropi Tie of i fed Resoluti'hs recoeending approval of the General Plan Amendment 89 -018 and Victoria Community Plan Amendment :99 -01 to the City Council and micow--nd issuance of a. "Negative Declaration, thereby allowing the designations to be changed from Medium -Wgh Residential to Neighborhood Commercial on the east site and Neighborhood Commercial to Low - Medium Residential of the west site. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner tj j 86:JG :ko Attachments: Exhibit °A" - C�,rrent Land Use Designation Map Exhibit "B" i!equest 4,,, Applicant Map Exhibit "C" - Letter to Residents Exhibit "C" Letter to Residents Resolution of Approval for General Plan Mendment Resolution of Approval for Victoria CommLnity Plani Amendment L]- NOTE: DENSITIES ACCVFKNM 40 At11OM AND PROACTED /LIQAUS COMMUKTY EACRHY &I" M 19.14 1LSW mWoe. 136 M rMM: GPA DMISMCPAS"I TITLE: CLERIM LAND-UM DESIGNATION,, EXHIEKT, "A" SCALE-.-HM T F0OMU AWWAY COMM A"AM TW CCIMV WV FACM" A.AM Y A-14 ldXAW L4W*s. r + TE DEWAMS ACC-qDM TO AMWW AM PRO=TW PWMCTS NORTH CITY CF rmm, -9-PA RANCHO TM.E, Fi WY ill .c PUMING ti ExHurr, JK M N Cllr OF 2ANCHO CUCAMONGA December b, 1988 ?^: Resident of the Surrounding Area Post Office Bar W7, Itancho Cucx=ngj. CaUfbnUa 9MV, (714) 909.101 SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN MiENOMENT 890'8 ON THE SOUTHEAST AND =T11WEST CORNERS OF HIGHLAND AND MILL, 741 AVEN`JES. Dear Resident: The applicant, William Lyon Cwpany has s3bmitted a M application regr:esting the changing land use designations on the two southern corners of Highland and Milliken Avenues. The request is to change the Medium -High Residential designation on the 12,9 acre east corner site to Neighborhood Ccamercial and the Neighborhood Commercial to Low- Medium Residential (4.0 dwelling units per acre) on the 9.3 acres on the west corner. The t.ow- Miedi•sa Residential designation is the s&ue as the land usl designation to the south and west of these sites. In addition, the application indicates that the Low - Medium Residential designation will be developed as single family duelling units xehich weans approximately 50 dwelling units on the western site, instead of the possible 260 dwelling units on the eastern site. An Exhibit is attached shoring the subject sites with existing and proposed land u3es. This letter is to inform you what ^^ being proposed and that the City has begun processing this amendmaij�. General Plan Amendment 09-013 is scheduled for a public hearing before the Planning Commission ca January 25, 1969. If you have any further questions please contact Jeff Gravel at (714) 989 -1861. Sincerely, COM96UNITY DEYELOP'MIEItT DEPARTMENT PLAN"AING DIVISION La ry Henderson Senior Planner LH.,mlg chleent Ca.'.n+5m ^xyy9+' William ). Alexander Charles I.9uquet Q Ctfy!1sRajer Denhis L. stout Dcbe1ah N. $town ef—V /I Pamela I. Wright Lauren M. Wasserman RESOLUTION LSO, A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE - —ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REC"ENCING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (GPA) NO. 89 -018 TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM -HIGH RESIDENTIAL, (1A44 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL, FOR 12 1:�- 4;ZRES AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AND HIGHLAND Au'.:1V*UES AND NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERC.AL TO LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), FOR 2.3 ACRES AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AND HIGHLAND AVENUES, RANCHO CUCAMOHGA, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227- 011.22 202211 -48 A. Recitals. (i) The William Lyon Company has Tiled an application for General Plan AmenOwnt flu. 89 -01B as described in the title of this Resolution, Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On January 25, 1989, the Planning Commission of Oe City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. (iii) All legal p- erequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. S. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho r—ucamonga as follows 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the fasts set forth in the kecitals, Part "A", of this Resolution �fe true and corre -1. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presenited to this Commission during the above - referenced publ'c hearing an January 25, 1989, including written and oral staff renoL s,, together w11A public testimony, this' Commission hereby spftifIcal?y finds as follows: a) The application applies;' - approximately 9.3 and 12.9 acres of land, basically rectangular configu Melons, 'located at the southeast and southw lt: corners of Highland and Milliken Avenues and are presently vacant, Said Ptvoerty is currently designated as Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) east of Milliken and Neighborhood Commercial west of Milliken Avenue; and PLANMING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NOS GPA 89 -OIB - WILLIAM LYON January 25, 1989 Page 2 L:..i b) The proop, -ter to the north of the subject site is designated as the Foothill freeway Co;reidor and is vacant. The property to the west is designated Medium -Nigh fctsidential and is developed single family residential. The property to the east ins designated Low- Medium Residential and is vacant. The property to the south is designated Medium -High Residential and is currently being developed; and c) This amendment does not conflict with the Land. Use Policies of the General Plan: and will ➢rovide for development, within the di>trict, in a manner consistent 'O th the General 'Plan and with related development; and d) This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and 6 This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant 117 act on the environment nor the surraunding properties. 3. Rased upon the substantial evidence presented to this Comissifon during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby fiNs and concludes a_ follows: a) The amendment does not conflict with the Land Use policies of the General Plan; and b) The amendment promotes the goals of the Land Uae Element of the General Plan; and c) The amendment would not be mater - ,t11y injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and further this Commission recommends the issuance of a Negative Declaration by the City Council. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set fw th in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Section 65880 to 65865 of the JCalifornia Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 25th day of January 1989, General Plan Amendment No. 89 -018. C. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Ll i PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION No. GPA 89 -01B - WILLIAM LYON January 25, 1989 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1989. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE"CITY OF RAWHO CUCAMONGA BY: �ra�" ry i. Mc-Niel, Chairman ATTEST: a u ,sr, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary cf the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cut. conga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passel, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission field on the 25th day of January, 1989, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: "TOES: COWISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: r "' - RESOLUTION hO.. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF VICTORIA CO1ftN1r,' PLAN AMENDMENT (VCPA) NO. 89,01 TO AMEND THE uj TORIA COMMUNITY PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM -HIGH' RESIDENTIAL (14-24 DWELLING UNI;'S PER ACRE) TO NEIGHBORHOOD C01MERCIAL, FOR 12.9 ACRES AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AND HIGHLAND AVENUES AND NEIGHBORHd0q ZORMERCrAL TO LOW - MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), FOR 9.3 ACRES AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MILL. :4 AND HIGHLAND AVENUES, RANCHO CUCAFMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227- 011 -22, 202- 211 -48 A. Recitals. M The William Lyon Company has filed an application- for Victoria. Community Plan Amendment No, 89 -01 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Victoria Community Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On klanuary 25, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: I. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part OP , of this Resolution am true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial eaidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on January 25, 1989, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a) The application applies to approximately 9.3 and 12.9 acres of land, basically a rectangular configurations, located at the southeast and southwest corners of Highland and Milliken Avenues and are presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) east of Milliken and Neighborhood Commercial west of Milliken; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. VCPA 89 -01 - WILLIAM LYON January 25, 1989 Page 2 . _ r�71 LJ b) The property to the north of the subject site is designated ;,s the Foothill Freeway Corridor end is vacant. The property to the vest is designated 14edium -Hi3h Residential and is developed single family residential. The property to the ,past is dest hated Low -bbdium Residential and is vacant. The property to the south is designated Medium -High Residential and is currently being developed; and c) ibis dmendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d) This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the La,-;d Use Element; and el This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties and that a Negative beclaration be issued. . 3. Based upon the substantial evideice pra-serted to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the speciviv findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hemby finds and concludes as follows: a) The amendment does not conflict with the land Use policies of the General Plan; and b) They amendment pre antes the goals of tha Land Use Element of the General Plan; and c) The amendment would not be materially injj!rious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been revie! X and considered for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act ,if 1970 and further this Commission recownds the issuance of a Negative Declaration by the City Council. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3. %nd 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Governrant Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby retowends approval on the 25th day of January, 1989, Victoria Community Plan Amendment No. 89 -01.. 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PLANNING C"ISSION RES61i6TION NO. VCPA 89 *01 , WILLIAM LYdH January 25, 1989 - Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1989. PLANNING COMMISSION OF TQE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY 'rry T. McHiel, Chairman rman ATTEST: Brad Huller, cretary 1, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planninr- `Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereav cartify that the - Jregoing Resolut`'An- a,as duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopf •4-by the .Manning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of January, 1999, by the following wrote- to -W.t;. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: HOES: CQC "IISSIONERS: ABSEWN COKMISS ?ONEKS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA cSICAMo _ . STAFF REPORT XA 4 a m O DATE: January 25, 1989 1977 TO: Chairman and riei!bers of the Planning Commission FRG:`: Brad Buller, City Planner 5': Steve Mayes, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: VARIANCE 88 -27 - CASTLE - A request to allow a room addition to encroach into the required interior side yard setback by 5 feet for a sin ?le family residence located in the Low Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) located at 9865 Cypress Court - APk: 201- 503 -15. I. PROJE,:T AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of Variance 88 -27. B. Surroundiria Lanni Use and Zoning: 1 r ting single ';ml y homes; Low Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) South - Existing single family homes; Lori Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) East - Existing single family homes; Low Residential District (2 -4 dwelling —its per acre) J Nest - Existing single famiT. ---,; Lora Residential District (2 -4 dwelling ,,.,its per acre) C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - cow es ential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) North - Low Residential District South Low Res�dehtial District East - Low Residential District West - Lrw Residential District D. Site Characteristics: The project site is developed with an existing 1,Z13 square foot single family one story house on an approximately 10,900 square foot lot. E. Appl ;cable Re ulationt: In the La.r Residential District, required interior side yard setbacks are 5 feet from the property line in one side yard and 10 feet in the other side yard. The approval; of this Variance weA d allow the applicant to encroach into the required 10 foot side yard setback. ITEM L PLANNING COWI SSION STAFF REPORT VARIANCE 6$ -27 - CASTLE January 25, 1909 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: The applicant is requesting a Variance to reduce the s7dR'yP setback adjacent to the southern portion of the lot from 10 feet to 5 feet in order to build a family room addition to an existing single family residence. The subject lot is situated on the end of a cul -de -sac on Cypress Court and is nearly triangular in shape with a small amount of frontage along Cypress Court. As a result, the lot has a� unusual Interior side yard condition. The mouse has been plotted as to maintain the required rear yard setback by 12 feet, but by doing so the mount of side yard moving toward tit° front of the lot becomes barer enough to meet the required side ;hard setbacks on both sides near the furthest front projection of the house. Th", applicant contends that the floor plan further restricts the ability to add onto the residence logically. In the a.,rtharn corner, a family room, addition may not be logical due to t;a master bedroom location on the floor, plan (see Exhibit "D "). However, a family room addition could be constructed into the rear yard area a distance of 12 feet and still maintain the required 20 feet rear yard setback. Tract 12523, whim was completed in early 1986, was constructed under current City standards for Lm Density Residential Development. All houses in this tract were built to maintain a minimum 5 'foot side yard setback in one side yard and a 10 foot setback in the other side yard. The side yard condition on the north side of the lot provides Justification for the Variance request. A 6 foot sethack is maintained at the closet point of the house to the north property line (the furthest front projection) and the setback increases to an ultimate distance of approximately 30 feet near the rear projection of the residence. If the average 20 foot side yard setback were considered to be the parameter of measurement, together with the proposed 5 foot setback in the south side yard, then the minimum side yard setbacks for the Loge Residential District would be met. III. FiCTS FOR FINDINGS: In reviewing the proposed Variance, the ann ng Oman ssron may wish to consider the following fact, which support the mandatory findings: L. The subject Tot is at the and of a cul -de -sac; due to its triangular shape, it is difficult to construct an addition on the lot which can maintain the required setbacks. IMF L 2' I r: El PLAWIM COMISSION STAFF REPORT VARIANCE 88-27 - CA41I' F January 26, 1389 Page 3 2. The closest point of the addition to the south property line will be 5 feet, which is thr�� °closest point of construction allcwable in the Loan Residential District and existing residences in the neighborhood, and run only 24 feet of the 110.46 - feet along the southern boundary of the lot. 3. The Variance, as specified in the application, will not contradict the goals or objectives of the City's General Plan or Development Code and will not promote nny detrimental condition to the persons or properties °'n the immediate vi ci ni ty. - 4. Due to the triangular shape of the lo,, the north side of the residence maintains an averrge setback of approximately 20 feet, even though the setback is 6 feet at the closest point along the north property line. 5. The existing layout of the house lends itself to a family room addition in a southerly direction. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Daily eport newspaper as a public hearing, the property pos£ea, and Tno ces were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. V. RECOWENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to consider input and elements of the project. After receiving all information, if the Piannina Commission can support the findings oatlined in this staff report, staff recommends approval of Variance 88 -27 through adoption of the attached Resolution. Res f l ed Br Cit BB:SH :mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Plan Exhibit "8" - Lette,, frt" Applicant Exhibit "C" Floor Plan Exhibit "D" - Location Kip Resolution of Approval 3 S. B. C. E. c. D. ♦O - =rty line __ 119.7 exist block` 0 0 �s 9 td AP6201 -5V -15 RANDY.J.CASTLE 9668 CYPRESS CT. ALTA LOMA CALIF. (714) 987 -6157 leaf q84' r -yro{s G7: ALTA LOMA, CA. m o n m � i N H f:1 O iz n o n SCALE - 1-20' fib Site plml n Im 7 Ste i ta> I I i ..y J 4YPIRIE55 COOT a TY 'A ING DIVISION r' EXHIBIT: r, SCALE; � .�: LATTER OF JUSTIFICATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: WITHIN 1000 SQUARE FEET OF MY HOUSE THERE OUR HOMES WITH S FOOT CLEARANCE ON EACH SIDE OF THEM OUR HOUSE HAS ONLY 1213 LIVABLE FEET. WE HAVE 3 CHILDREN WE WOULD LIKE TO ENJOY A MODEST FAMILY ROOM LIRE THE REST OF THE HOUSES IN OUR NEIGH- BORHOOD. DUE TO THE DIFFICULT FLOOR PLAN OF OUR HOUSE I CAN'T SEE NO OTHER WAY TO GET A FAMILY ROOM. THIS HOUSE PLAN IS, THE ONLY ONE IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD THAT DIDN'T HAVE A FAMILY ROOM. IF YOU CAN SHOW ME A DIFFERNT WAY I WOULD APPRECIATE IT. I CAN'T AFFORD TO MOVE AND I PROBA"Y COULDN'T QUALIFY PLUS I REALLY LIRE MY NEIGHBORS AND THIS COMMUNITY. MY CHILDREN ENJOY THERE SCHOOL AND ALL OF THERE FRIENDO AT THERE SCHOOL. I HAVE ALREADY SPENT APPROXIMATELY $922.00 GN THIS ADDITION AND MY CISION TO STAY AND ADD ON WAS BASED ON A ROUGH DRAWN PLAN THAT BROUGHT INTO :LANKING DEPARTMENT IN FEBRUARY 1988. I SHOWED IT TO A TALL BLOND GUY WHO LOOKED AT MY SET BACKS AND SAID IT WOULD BE OK TO BUILD. BUT AFTER $922.00 AND AFTER 10 MOUTHS LATER HE MYSTERIOUSLY DOESN'T WORK THERE ANYMORE SO THATS WHY WERE IN THIS PREDICAMENT. SO PLEASE TAKE A LOOK AT THIS FLOOR PLAN AND YOU WILL SEE WHAT I MEAN SO WE HOPE YOU WILL APPROVE THIS VARIANCE SO WE TO CAN HAVE A FAMILY ROOM.OUR CHILDRENS AGES ARE 2 6 10 THEY DO NEED A PLACE TO PLAY SO I HOPE THIS LETTER JUSTIFIES A VARIANCE. THANK YOU FOR LISTENXNG TO OUR PROBLEMS. r.7 .c SINCERELY YO `1'ITi,E« 4-e #zr si�.,)asf�p•F'ta`�°i�n ANNIM; DlVlS4!ON --- - EXHIBIT: ,��.. SCALE:�..� A► w IRTH — HBER`rY STREET— — _ rz.ao as 0 .i.s+ 1! C a? / - 3f8 3 330 0 344Qzsa 3a 2 24 23@ ctg 44 or IL 8_ i 8/ . .a h � 22 � -- -- N!SISCUS ��`9COURT h— — /.Q 64 21 a' Ibl7 �► All 4 e l' @ 16 @ 4 17 2° 18 " 19 t2s 2Q a s : i.3 �JLi �mLC'}t'I dP4 t�4p SCALRs a. ? J l421 1302o, 12 lit i 10�T7�i g,is '33 t� 9 t ' �o n w dE ♦L '�`'"n viva 1a $° ci 'N — — CYPRESS COURT N y� 1 t n 7S ox ei k N n Ip 2 Q 3 Eo 4 u 6 ...�"! _ h LEMON STREET -- - a .- N ro. . : i.3 �JLi �mLC'}t'I dP4 t�4p SCALRs a. ? RESOLUTION NO. h RESOLIMIGN OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING 'VARIANCE NO. 88 -27 TO ALLOW A ROOM ADDITION TO ENCROACH INTO THE REQUIRED INTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK BY 5 FEET FOR A SINGLE FAMILY RE`1DENCE IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2 -4 DWELLIL UNITS PER ACRE) LOCATED AT 9868 CYPRESS COURT, AND ilfXING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT 7dEREOF - APM: 201- 503 -15 A. Recitals. (i) Kim and Randy Castle have filed an application for tht: issuance of the Variance No. 88 -27 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application. ". (ii) On January 2C, 1989, the Planning Commission of the -City of °ancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal �arerequinites to the aaoptien of this Resolution have oc - urred. B. Resolution. i NOV, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specffically finds that all of the facts %et forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on January 2ii", 1989, including written and oral staff reports, togel-her with public .testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 9868 Cypress Court with a street frontage of 40 feet and lot depth of 152.82 feet and is presently improved with a single gamily residence and publi` improvements; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is single family residential, the property to the south of that site consists of single family residences, the property to the east is single family residential, and the property to the west is single famitly residential. . (c) The subject lot is at the end of a cul -de -sac; due to its triangular shape, it is difficult to locate an addition on the lot which can maintain the required setbacks. L" c3 PLANNING COMISSiON RESOLUTION 140. VAR 88 -27 - V3TLE January 26, ',J89 Page 2 11 (d) The closest point of the addition to the south property line will be fine (s) feet, which the closest: point of construction allowable in the Low Residential Distrlwt and existing residences in the neighborhood, and will run oriy 24 feet of tnL 110,46 feet along the southern boundary of the lot. (f) Due to the triangular shape of the lot, the north side of the residence maintains an average setback of approximately 20 feet, even though the setback is 6 feet at the closest point along the north property line. (g) The existing laycut of the house tends itself to a family room addition in a southerly direction. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That strict or literal interpretation aW enforcement or the specified regulation would result in practical difficult{: or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. (b) That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved on to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally `to other properties in the same district. (e) Th&t strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of they specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. (d) That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations an other properties classified in the same district. (e) That the granting of the Variance will not ae detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions; set forth in paragraphs. 1, 2 and 3 above, this cowission hereb�1 approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. � PL:'1lININD COMMISSION RESULit('ION ?JD. VAR 88 -27 - CASTLE January 25, 1989 Page 3 E I S. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF JAN11i4R`: , 1989. PLANNIWI COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA i cf., aaFF" ": t�'R%T; -Hai rman AWESf: Brad Oullir, secretary 1, Nad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Col 1, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,, do hereby certify that the fovQgoing .Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of 4anchos Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of January, 1989, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: WIS: COWISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Of DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF DEPORT January: 25, 1989 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Beverly Nissen, Assistant Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSM 17 AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13898 - NUNEZ res ent a s iMsion o single family on 2.47 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre), located at the northwest comer of Lemon and London Avenues - APN: 201- 251 -57 and 58. Associated with this project is Tree Removal Permit 88 -58, 1 requesting the removal of 10 Eucalyptus Globulus, 3 frwit T trees and.4 pi-r,: rees. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. ktion Requested: Aprrov31 of the subdivision map, grading plan, and issuance of a negative Declaration. B. Project Density; 3.2 dwelling units per acre C. Surrounding Land Ilse and Zonin or a acan ; l.ow ns y idential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre /. South - Lemon Avenue Land vacant beyond; Low - Medium Density Residential District (4 -8 dwelling units per , :e). East - Existing single family residen.z, Low Densi%, Resid &ntial District (2 -4 de0 ling units per acre). West - Existing Single Family Residences; Low Density Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre). D. General Plan Designations: roJec .s - Cow Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) North - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) South - Metljum Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per ;acre) East. - Low.ftsidential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) West - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) ITEM 11 1 PLFNNING CtNMNISSI °4 STAFF REPORT TT ;3898 - N.UNEZ January 25, 1989 Paga 2 _ E. Site Characteristics : The site is located northeast of the n ersection of emon and Archibald Avenues and slopes approximately 3 percent from north to south. The site is currently occupied with a single family residence which fronts onto Lemon Avenue, and a barn and corral. The existing single family residence is proposed to be incorporated into the subdivision.. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The project as currently proposed is for tract su v s :on only. According to the applicant, design review for house plans will be submitted at a later date. Lots within the subdivision range from 8,545 to 19,831 e,uare feet. The average lot size is 10,044 square feet. The existing dwelling will occupy ate southernmost lot of 19,831 square feet. B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Kroutil, __ reap 'foTstoy ) reviewed the project on p e ber 8, 1988 and approved it with the following condition: 1) A decorative wall, compatible with adjacent tracts to the east, should be provided along the western tract boundary. C. Grading Committee: The Grading Committee reviewed and approved t project on December 5, 1988 subject to the condition listed in the attached Resolution. D. Tree Removal Permit: In conjunction with the proposed tentative roc.. map, he appiicant has sibmitted Tree Remoiial Permit 88 -58 requesting the removal of 10 Eucalyptus Globulus, 3 fruit trees and 4 pine ',trees. The Eualyptus trees are all located within the right of way for Liberty Street and are proposed for -removal when the street is eventually widened. Seven of the 10 Eucalyptus are either dead or are stumps and therefore are not subject to the replacement criteria of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. The remaining 3 Eucalyptus trees were apparently once part of an oast; -est trending windrow. However, the windrow does nat continue east of London Avenue, nor does it continue west of Archibald Avenue. Due to this situation, the removaT of the three Eucalyptus tree, would not disrupt the continuity of the windrow since it extends only for ` a distance of approximately 250 feet along the north and A/11 1{ '- PLANNIP.5 CiWMISSION STAFF REFDRT TT 13898 - NUNEZ Janua,y 25, 1989 Pe4e 3 ° northwest of the proposed project. Staff would recommend, however, that due to the size of the trees proposed for removal, 24, 30, and 3.5 inches in diameter, that an enhanced parkHay treatment be provided along the south side of Liberty Street. The establish d street tree for Liberty Street is Quercus suber (Cork Oak) and staff would recommend that rather than planting these trees 24 feet on center which would result in the planting of F trees, that 10 trees be planted instaad. The pimis proposed for removal are only 4 -0 inches in diameter ,ani are not subject to the replacement criteria in ttte Tree P,,i�re..r ation Ordinance. The fruit trees proposed for removal are also not subject to tree 4 °placement. E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has. copleted the Envir4nmental Cliecklist and found no significant adverse environmental ,impacts as a result of this project. If the Planning Commission concurs with these findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate if the tentative tract is approved, III, FACTS FOR FINDI6S: The project is :onsistent with the Genera; Plan an a eve opm --nt Comte. The project Trill not be detrimental to the public health or sifety, or ca +ise tviisance or significant environmental impacts. In addition, the nro—ned ttse, subdivision AP and conceptual grading plan together i th the seccrJRended conditions of approval, are in complia.,j _. with the applicable provisions of the Development Code and City standards. IV. CORRESPONDENCE., This item has bee, = advertise4 ze a public hearing in TW lM-Try-W+ort newspaper and notices were sent lt3 all property owners wiE>� -eet of the project s.`e. V, RECOMMENDATIM: Staff recowmends that the Plaonirq Commission approve eroa ive Tract ...3898 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions, approve Tree Removal Permit 88 -58, and issue a Neg4tive Declaration. ZRel ty r e!" 88:8N;js PLANNING COWISS ON STAFF REPORT TT 13998 NUNEZ January 25, 1989 Page 4 - Attarhientss Fxhibit "A" - Site Util zatiov Map Exhibit 1`0 - SuhdivWon Map Exhibit "`" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit 1W - Tree 'kemoval rlan Resolution wf Approval with Conditions tie C.L.Xtua �.:t:,f, •r'SPRt>n:�-a�•1 -- I ur 110 f 1 It Y,v ! couRr LEMCM Aysmus ! T LOW a ST g �c s asr� A J A a L OF ._, =v 3 u LOX a' LOTI J LOW i ati s�wcin. pw.�.Y {ev {1 Y i J 7 EJJ d rMfvt= T�"�fnu% y�y,� tgf�tt��+,tr�J M� IC EXIiIW_ .��. ..7t..1 UI f ,4 - pit-* I C- —1 22 va OT. J$ 14 rMs,L—&rRr1l1r; 7-71; TfTut afJ7 tAf_ OV fSOIA16 EXHIW, SCALE- m 7 P win pit-* I C- —1 22 va OT. J$ 14 rMs,L—&rRr1l1r; 7-71; TfTut afJ7 tAf_ OV fSOIA16 EXHIW, SCALE- m 7 ovor e�'PI reaYiwa. t SZV4 *z4 -Pt. q�Y p ca 4r� A y 0� 1°4 .: �GLC2�G,��y �7'EGS ema�run� ,2r� � Imo: TiyTArIU 7RG7' /3�_ TITLE: &Alo yA-4 Lxetl__�____> EX IR SCALE' m '? E RESOLi TION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CON-lissION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC&MONGA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP N: 13G98, MD RELATED TREE REMOVAL PERMIT NO. 88 -58, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 8 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 2.47 ,ACRES OF 'AND ACRE) LOCATEDEAT THE I NORTHWEST CORNER OF LEN! C AVENUE AND 0NDON AVENUE • APN: 201- 251 -57 & 58. A. Recitals. (i) Henry Nunez has filed an application for the approval of Tenta`ive Tract Map No. 1084 and the related Tres Removal Permit No. 88 -58 as descri -. ;n the title of this Resolution. Hereinafua, in this Revolution, the subject request. is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On the 25th of January 1589, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamovga conducted a qtly noticed public hearing or, the dpplication and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal p"erGquisitas to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. S. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Com- ission of the City of natt ho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolutior are true and correct. 2. Rased upon substantial evidence pre senteu to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on January 25, 1989, including written and oral staff repots, together with pubtic testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The appiicatlon applies to property located at 1-,he northwest corner of Lemon and London Avenues with A street frontage of ill feet 3P. Lemon Avenue and 576 feet along London Street and is p asentiy improved with one sing'4e family residence aM a barn; and (b) ache property to the north of the subject site is vacant and designated for Low [tensity Residential, th% property to the south of that site consists of vacant land designated for Low - tedium density residential, the property t9 the east is developed with single family residences in the Low Density Rosidential District, and tto property to the west is developed with single family residences in the Law Oc rsity Residential 9i5�,.rict. —q PLANNING COMMISSIO14 RESOLUTION 'NO. TT13898 - NUNEZ January 25 1989 Pass 2 - (c) Proposed '.ot sizes are consisted with the existing surrounding neighborhorids, (d) The property contai.:s 10 Eucalyptus 91ob,slus trees, 7 of which are either stumps or dead,, The remaining thtsp trela,%'are proposed for removal due to the widening of liberty Street. 3. Stsed upan the substantial evidence present0i to this Commission during the above- rafrencpd. public Bearing and upon the, specific findjngs of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Co wsi',la'3on hereby fin0s and concludes as follows: (a) That tentative bract is consistent with the G -neral Plan, Development Code, and specific plans, and (b) The design or impwrvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Developirent rode, and Specific, plans; and (c) The site is ph e-ically suitable for the type of develoMtent prolaosedm and (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely "p :,use substantial !�nvira mental damage aa,', avoidable injury to humans a,nd wildlife op their habitat; and (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and (f) The design of the terrgtive tract will not conflict with any easewnt acquired by the public tt large, nim of record, for ar eas through jr use of the property within vhe proposed cubdi lsion, 4. This Cmifsion 'hereby fines and Certifies that the project has been mviewed and considered an coarpliance with the California Environmental Qu+lity Art of 1970 and, further, this Comissiou bareby issue., a Negative Cecl -i.ration 5. Based upon the finding-,t -ind co%lusions set forth in paragraph 1, M_ 3 and 4 above, this Commission herehy approvss tha application subject to each and every condition set: forth below and in the atwGned Stapdard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated her.in by this reference. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT13898 - NUNEZ January 25, 1989 Page 3 Tentative Tracy Map 1) Overhead Utilities a. London Avenue - The existing overhead 'utilities (telecommunication and electrical) on the project side of London Avenue shall be undergrounded from the existing pole on Lemon Avenue to the northerly pole on London Avenue and then westerly to the terminus pole on Liberty Street, prior to public improvement acceptance or occipancy, whichever occurs first. The Developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one -half the City adopted cost For undergrounding from fut0a develophiant (redevelopnd,nt) as it occurs on the opposite side of Oe street. b. Lemon Avenue - An in -lieu fee as.,vrntribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunicatlons and electrical) on the project side of Lemon, Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to the approval of the Final Pap. The fee ;�shaT` be the full City adopted unit amount times the lr►tgth from the center of London Avenue to the west project boundary. 2) A decorative wall, compatible with the :adjacent tract to the east, shall be provided along the western tract boundary. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. The applicant shall work with adjacent property owners to resolve any double wall situi�tions prior to the issuance of building permits.. 3) Drainage shall bn accepted from the wasterl properties in a private drainage easemant. 4) Tree Removal Karwit 8858 is approved subject to reula(:Qment with 10 Guercus Suber along the south side,of Liberty Street, Infastel wood from cut Eucalyptus tre,.s ihall bt 07.ppad, removed and buried at a dump site or tarped to the ground for a minimum of six months, sealing the tArp edges wiiN soil, to prevent emerging borer beetles from ivinfestiq other trees or wood. 6. Th;e Sec -etary to this CoWssion shall ce 1'%y W the adoption of this Resolution. r PLANNING COWISSI+ON RESOLUTION NO. 71713898 NUNEZ Jatnuary 25, 1989 Page 4 APPRO9"tD AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF JANUARY 198.. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RONAO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNeil, Chairman ATTEST:- Bu er, ecru ry I, Brad Busier, Secretary of the Plann!;ng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; do hereby certify that the toxoMoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and ,adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission Meld on the 25th day of January 1989, by the following Yobs -to -wit: AYES: COMN!= 'SaIOHERS: NOES: COWISSIONERS: AO-SENT: C(I!$IISSIONERS: LA J 1 41 v a ffyj ^66w °��%t sp a. ♦�Q "n � aG u�n� � °:sue ��La °V�bN N6 �e�°•. +O' ��a� u6N b.'C. °CaO ' le � N e 'S6A O q'oT LiC��wT Lys ~3wYS FFY,�VO YY� ,+pC��'L TC6$ �� ~W� « �,@ � ` g•Q i AT IOY. C� 0.Y 4 K A A N YMC °• i pCp� Q a1.: 4 - �>M6 a` Pr T-_ ° ilk a i� vV < q a.1: �54.Njy a�0. .�` i3a' VY~y. 11M `CV�pT F4F Y�{Y ht..�• w!%itjjg�� ✓Q.� qa RE Qw"'44 A Y•NC`1 C1�a4°ifP =1•.. ji1 (� NM.C. �� y�+iM�G~Y. yM.YQ yY.N.�s Y�yj�yy� Ali. V Eli ,r�r3.. HIM RwV 6f3ANL�7t » all KMr KO Y lY Af. t� y�O X1 I W Q 4 4 Wt rV.r M a 6 V la E LH tom~ et4 �N• Qi( � .. N a. E, ly yRW Y �3 N a Vy° Vol 0 �yf tN° i V W 4f7" Original Poor Qualify coin 01IFS etl ?1~J- *1 ni.!ipl Z-2 nn bmp r , 5- qtl N 3 Gu9% Vj O ~gyp .Lj ad o yeYD M„ ^± �„Ny6 y q,Z �p UZ -gyp 3 r�v. Jis NP-.� �'i ink' tt^r,'�'bTN L 3 N 4Li Set Eli all J. O-.A yqr SN N vp 0ON p}V� NOUY.�rM1� rG p�T S C71 app -&r ��syYsCrYw �Qtd �•s,:_ aya n�CC Nit»' Nc QI vas L ed�C4 yr «NOe L Cv- {pI Yn �=a"'� 'V p. a O V A 4 I}YG� N`` Ta.' N!� N; O o.0 w y e G Cy �. C _MM -�,,R• $ tT,r �rj� orMNNN. €"yes "3 - -�. aQ LC g�QA�;. ig 2 gip. E yQyNp.yy-�F �{'� w�iiiNL�q�Q '0�+, Fy� LC�OI • ni�(yGyS7 !1`'�}�AM a tLf �•Yy Q H Ol'7 Es- �• �!L a�:te eyn «aa tte�Z�jj....VVVVEy.... q�{ hoc �v� A �T� ' s e♦ L +err sty Is Ct � �O V S✓6 Liar �r + ' r' ''M fi�_. �« ^ �tN_. cis 4t M1 s Mq �e• M y ^�. JI ;Y> �MV �. •. ° "e I. L y Y. • • *� b Y 4 Y 0. - .a w L y �A ve4 _O tl '2 T w e 3 TL i «`e $j >s> pr P w Y 1O P r p M V G C w G ®« B :TLZ1 e .. �h� btl4p its V. `L' Y 4w9d ppL ' S , ,. e. .^'ty � F y s as «etLa pia •. +y �''$�� .��. i� L��`° Q ��+ °. ,Qpo�',*��a '5a�a,,., lf1t ew Y�O. «to. »° ` s CY V Y �i �� wsr �� a� �'6►�: a`c � °S"E Eu .�..� "ate �N QII•li•'3, c3Oa LaVS. 6 eL Y. Mss� Lr «a � jra -Mil it rswck <�Mg' �`� <.v g541 ° 1 `1��' Lc'S�AxT® a ° <a 0 I N Drigina9 Poor Quanty � yy QC pp CJU pL L �Y 0000.'+a�v i'Y --In ' C f 1.ke .Ass G � � N s. Y L O'1 q ice^ p' w G° 4! M G p 0 • C i Y O °� L C w a Lp� �C} L' y Na� N � Y (Clp �n p OCM C'O LN {Ot ■y32 r•�„C "f!N A Ms r7�Yy V��yuK�N �M 00 ^''rI �'.�yY � •�Q Fe 'O. pA ■Np. I, 3 V py L „YLy bLgO Ky dY Cy N? Qi z 'N ^•� �Lpduj o `may q V Y y p Y P i p L p s Y ! M� O N N V Y S V M^ ^ p N L L `O q C N ^ p^p YY, y° N O O^ CPY N by °/ C7 a M Y' .Y: {w��LppGyyN .op .��yyyY�Y! �pC �wC N O y� pO�NT G'� p ^{Y ■{G. �Mrot O i�LNM ^,Nw�.O g sy�w'{� 2. O•pQO Y�sry q`L 9 O�AHSG OQ f�S1� Y_GN �JV Y3.� 11.N y « YE ♦ ��MO �VK.GYKY{Op� M H Y w C 'MV yV� G 4YrL�M� ^�Y =Y�ipO v M Y ip II C ..{°� O C1 qq M � L ps VY i ^ N Z w 8i 2 ^. —r. - y q Y0qO�' I. ^Gicyuw "a{{` GcardLo 2S SL ^�L�LCtcM$o2Y°prt' Sd' s 4C& acp''+p�$�QC `Cate IRE iY MNppM�� ^�Y OL103 {{L��•�•40��{yy�y .�.�C � ..�0 Lyx GL41 N^ M q I"1 f K/ ><I ( 1 1 V ��6 Ne ue p YlS1 ya R >r wM^ ..�ccN± � ; Y rLSi`L3 �'� Q�= OOVGG�� ° ys s M N .* fty$$ Y a��y r�'^ 2V2 LNQ�Q O�T^ � Kwp +f {•�;P 1ST �� Y:�� GY �a� bM CY _C 11 C `+ `� + Q uN�' S s� �v, u 6) w�O u • MQN Q CpQ L q�r l3 Sit G :,y Y y r! C a r 0 V G kA e” Lr �1f ��p« Y� p cCL,� a +� 4Ny$T LM M�wGY spa g��s pa Xg �° ZU�� L rd'i°a 7c +a M Al 'i N L MMp ) y a. Y �.q ; ^yMNy yya I •�i'cc y y 3 4 i 4b. M Vp Y .1 Y S L'h N Y,AO Y •N i�t 25 j! V.- 1. f MO NYNY Nay IYYO L^'t p�ccip Yy ;.vR 'py (Y ` U N�ugA� �y �CpA t 7 �� M.� Y py O.+O �y µ ■y. wKS '9M.Q K .0.07. �6Y�a �C w GYwY =4 ca.'+ d��wfiA L2= ►use Lc C3 uad aGi it,r "w'+rj � °0 3� n `Lis _��.. a "dn('" csr ° 'Y a :� ' wYy a�.L ■a ®■ my �ym^�t yG CO ^00 K!y �Y u+# O LAIY �# �: M ti i'3dL AS_j x1, tom.. � W u Q .ia er d OrcgInal Poor Quality c_oa ° QL S2. c z Nw s ..m ■ C e 1 p tl - cc j- 6 «.x G • ��. �i /� pyN U c :W V t#tlrC! a�Az _ea � NO C 10 V H O +A+oTy�Qa�fO. a V c Y C O C $ V O c z L V5 �3� c m 5- i�w sum emu V! Z.;55 ° N a c � a y� g tl� T"M 'Y{{■C■(( Y�a N$ua$. pY LY G L 6Y QVQ i s ■c w w Nis �M w c �.NS a`La�c X111 1z ED AZ'',;.AfR�:: Yu O 8 c_oa ° QL S2. .'Aii p G ..m G'�CYY� G • ��. �i /� pyN 4- V t#tlrC! �ic � NO C 10 ali �mg-E H Exl Y HER g z � �g r I,.j �3� c m 5- i�w '�s d,CwQe + c Off i �e ` c �.NS a`La�c nfjP& iN. 43 ■r$I � N Yu O 8 LV q +{g V V R` Enw:yy qc tl4 +Y s "a^0j N Ntl Aw a Y � Y. o C • Otlq �yt�Qy'. G�- w a +� y�y'rQ Z=T qY� iii s N A Y wS w ^g ♦ 1R o�w .9!Z a o#ary 24f�iy 'S C�OV VC C paV >U uo> c4N {y, Y �� Wa JSui OO.e3 t �y�aati:�. � 3rw ]I ss rJM gw liyz +j �w�C � OU • WS a •c " 83 �d1.i YI 1i x �d ��p agg yb ! �tl 3 u N_ #q ad .L O Ci�.1Y Y p G ..m V t#tlrC! �ic � Nip 10 ali �mg-E H Exl OG N 5�wr 3e > w 6 Ni N O �3� c m 5- i�w '�s d,CwQe a w nfjP& iN. 43 ■r$I � N Yu O 8 L . k� q; pV �tN9 i� i` qtlp 9 = tl4 +Y s "a^0j N v c� ww C tl N.Pa ®iai Nei lY Li + i. > Mw a..4 a- r0'�•yCA 3_2 4. Y wS w ^g �Y �4N C L fp■l� 7� It der b ss� U Original Po0j, Quality - ii :` g t e 3 c }}c!"pLpy�n c, 1 V �y wig �9cc3 Y1a Y L ++mow b.s. •`.q T fir. O q G^ � Y � w V LM yt �qn■ Wy4NQ Q��. �y � �.. p 4+1N9 µ. O,M4.� a�� «r.0 �✓•Py V#• �� Lar � ; C�'iaQ k� .ems r='�_Cf c.�= •mot ;zs: WC - y9N � _p M Ly p �Lxo o N 2 y�Y a =iVJC11 o QgF��fMa'"� �' , cry ;,•N+ 3 '�'~':` � �� m '"'�� c M tiy qLe Y..yx L V NNU. rLLy�� Mrt+nn�, tat •S��C 'C 4J 9 bbp [i lQA.�� 4►pi t � aLi.N Y'II � �NtD�� a. G O C r�jQ r w �i-1 Z, � YAC C Y � i '��•c N ^y 6 3® M Y t+ �i2s M i y � a l�F)f)tt !q t a I+ MirC M1�M i6 ~Qj QYO �y. }qiY � ~K4C 1f�Gl N y f► �. r� � � fY yy2 ' CC M aR yGy�y p .; {c/ y3a Q� N� Ch+ vtPA Li i w�tM� �sf �4v OiV M Mir' } �i'tdV Yew *�}Q Li A4P ij 4. w= mTt vt f2 H�}g'a:: 7 1 -02 01-25-89 PC Agenda o 3 of 5 m w Q V W M oA N Y L y N�7 Y '+ u CyY� Qy ♦.1CL) s= C 4 6 ` ■V■ YL •C e OI V JCC�ppe C 4 L r Y <'a L y, A V Y V y N ' 9 w S L Y oL 6�' a+ Y'O1Q O aW�n « Y nLL v3 o�f7w ig uN a ` e� q W' r S� C O L ' e 7� _e e� y41 a d w °1 ; J c o w vV� K L Jriginal pc),,r Q,,, ,I,ty _om CGY .'�. A +Ka C'; yC V C •Y°^ ppC Wj•' C��N L C� y~ q L ^ �° �� a LN 4V y V � 4�. CG y� C �"W � ys 1 �i• 4. Y. 5 Y w w 3 Rs '^' a. U.5 y 4 wM• C N I- N yyO pp3 !yiV ' 11.i Nq��c CN V ?.. Y t^.z_ dC yLV L CC L V r G q N Y a, GQY L u �� «t s > q V C Yi. N yC 9 QO Q 6 Yd fy q a CN H. qL . ■ V I.,Q°t' y 9�1Y• a'� CMybb L ^�Npn. r yY �� Of 'V^ `Lw nN ■4 N 4- Oai CY N ' q Yr i.� �` V V MY'O� udC ■ owal a m,AY n u er N.• L.5 a p �+t�CtCaa�i L> VI'O Y1y {{{{{Npiiyii N>+M iVd QW K4L?ipYYY W..LYN4LV OL O.� Yq YtlYC His Gp�%acC �I.Y O.` gyp. Va.'Y 1,1°r �O ►ei QfiN m 01 i A 1wi q nQi ti ; r CW 1•f r v °u Y 0 m b 9� d� N A er x { ■C�'M NY L Y IN L N v 4 pVVV� p a y SN q "a c rt m y C Y �3ec. t•FA W q S C L Y A ltl Y L n Y r d1 C ^ L N sY ai L N QO r b� 4 w a L u... N ew Vf Y a�w 7 y .wriCW NA W w Nn CMA ga. '4YM Ot s 's @ '0141 Y ~ 11 ~L1i7 6i •. ,It rV. Y YM. L YpNO Ms CCE wa~ ^ w� L, p w —, 7 HE 9's" e� � Y e E y&Nic �Yab4 DLNyp �� I a R a�i Cw pM i 0 c g T1 � gYT,M S 5!Y 6 N V e N 2-5 O +N jj ^pM� f 1b1 �L9 cL Pam NI w . a'sLo i{ 4 Y. ® V °.fig ""I� -,% zwb L�.W -. C v— Owy V O:W qw°. K.GW A � p� Gri y CD ` °� i iOt 6IL 4� 6N n � � LG .cY Cl� nb CVK L u v` +• 9a2L L Y p0. q �w3 s 4 d Ci S t Z� 1 _ 110' LV W s C� silt 9 VY os i �M9 r"affi� Ai SA •VZI 'pqt v w it L n J W 4 S 'b ° �+�' L 'R rat -W NI 1 31-1 L 5 Lit YV v L � Q V � a (. I� »- yiF� w as lea r C w M V a. tl1 L� J A N sLt M K V tttttt'�iiiii d y a. L 4 C L �p �a M.r.4 YfLii Y=% 5I 'a vf'rs .ate � aTCa�� ,� ��.,a.'.�t ,t!". •.. � Wu� Y K �[ Ci Poor pia {ter: '�9VS i4 L Q •C C4' Y .1 -9f is MN nut 0 C s d (q� c u; �yYS us M»Mp Y� N V G Y GS Y ., «23 N� L yyMAy ��O p`{ qW� 0 . O «i 4AC u%I VMR Nw 4t1 O 4 ��Ay6 RQk � W fi h E L 11 CITY OF AANCI£O CUCAMONGA r STAFF REPORT DATE: January 25, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members of the M anni -g Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Jeff Gravel, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 89 -01C - request to a nd a total o parcels (approximately 10 acres) of the General Plan land use map from Mediums Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low - Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) those parcels 'located on the south side of Lemon extending approximately 1,100 feet east of Archibald Avenue and the parcel on the north side of Highland and extending 789 feet east of Archibald Avenue - APR: 201- 252 -01, Od,,_04, 21� 22, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North Existing single family residential, zoned for Lori Pesidenti`a1 (2 -4 dwelling urrYts per acre) South - Existing single family residential, zoned for Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) East; - Vacant, zoned for Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) on northern half and Medium Residential (8- 14 dwelling units per acre) on the southern hilf. Test - Existing single fasd ly residential, zoned for Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) B. General Plan Designations: o ec i% = ' um esTdenti al (8 -14 dwelling s.ri is par acre) North - Law Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) South - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units par acre) East - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre on the north half and Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) on the southern half West - Low Residential (2 -4 duelling units pnr acre) ITEI4 t€; I PLANNING C%IMISSIOR STAFF REPORT GPA 89 -01C — City of Rancho Cucamonga January 25, 1989 Page 2 11 C. Site Chat -,cteristcs: The parcels in question are ;gyredaa na e y vacnnt except for 4 single family hones near the southeast corner of Archibald anr' Lemon Avenues. The character of the surrounding properties is single family residential, except the properties to the south which is the right -of -way of the future Fcoth:ll Freeway. I1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS14ENT: Siaff has cowpleted the Initial Study and reviewed a nv ronmentel Checklist, part I1 of the Initial Study, and has foul no significant adverse environmental impacts to occur as a result of the proposed General Plan Amendment 89 01C. It is anticipated that any issue of vehicular impacts may be successfully mitigated at the development project level. l III. ANALYSIS: The City of Rancho Cucamonga initiated General Plan r�ienZiidnni 89 -01C to updrre and promote consistency between the General Plan map and th( Development Districts map.. The reason these parcels are i4consL tent with the General Plan map ~�s due tc a previous General 'Plan Mendment (Text) which changed dimsity of Medium Residential from 4 -14 dwelling units per acre 'to 8 -14 dwelling units per acre. Currently, the General Plan's residential densities are Lsw- Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units pe, acre) acid Medium Residential which is limited to 8 -14 dwelling units per acre. Within the subject site, those areas which are developed and areas which are to to developed, now in the City process for development, are presently locked in at Low - Medium Residential, according to the Development Districts map. A representative from The Church of Christi ° Ontario, owner of a parcel (1.55 acres) within the Amendment area on Archibald hcs stated opposition to the proposal by the City. The Church indicated that the value of their property will drop if the proposal is approved. fts %ver, if the Church's parcel remained Medium Residential this would be 2 spat zone which the City does not encourage. TRis amendment is a measure to clean up outdated land use designations on parcels which were zoned Medium Residential under the old General Plan de :,'ty designation. This .proposal Is promoting land usn consistency, with the surrounding areas, and will reflect an orderly descending order of land use intensity. " -I ,-,) PLA'#NING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA X19 -01C - City of Rar;ho Cucamonga January 25, 11P69 Page 3 AUNk mum IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: GenPrai Plan Amendment 89 -01C will not be =inien-�al to the adjacent properties or cause significant adverse environmental impacts.. Should the Commission determine that the amendment would promote the land use goals and purpose of the General' Plan, the following findings must be made for approval: A. The subject property is suitable for the intended land use of the amendmB- . This is indicated by successful �%velopment of similar i..fsnsity land use projects in the immediate areas and the properties comply with the existing minimum lot size for the density. B. The intended land usa is compatible with the surrounding areas in terms of access, vehicular /pedestrian circulation and intensity. This is evidenced by similar land use designations on the surrounding properties. C. The proposed amendment does noti have any adverse environmental impacts that cannot be mitigated. This is indicated by findings of the Initial Study. D. The amendment is in conformance with the goals and objective of the General Plan. V. CORRESPONDENCE; This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The vaily - Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices sent- offal proper owners within 500 feet of the project site, VI. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a affacched Resolution recommending approval of the General Plan Amendment 89 -OIC to the City Council and recommend issuance of n! Negative Declaration, thereby allowing the designation to be changed from "Medium Residential" to "Low- Medium Residential ". Respectfully submitted, Brad Bu ler City Planner BB:JG:vc Attachments: Exhibit "A" - General Plan Map Exhibit "B" - General Plan Map (If Approved) Exhibit "C" Development District Map Resolution of Approval J LOW DEWSITY ti � 4r • K#YAOLT1,10 LOW 2-4 DU S/M j•j.� y iY E LOW DENWy LOW 2-4 OU SJAC N J 't7'1'LEi LiEVELOP°MENT DiS '. l TS_t A ,SCALE, 'NOWE 0 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Of' THE CITY OF RAKHO CUCANDNGA, CALIFORNIA, RE,'MMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN Al+tENDMENT NO. 89 -01C, R €QUEST ING TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAUI LAND USE MAP FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8a 14 OWEELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4- DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 10 ACRES OF LAW LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF LEMON EXTENDING APPROXIMATELY 1,100 FEET EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND THE PARCEL ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HIGHLAND AND EXTENDING 780 FEET EAST OF ARCHIBALG AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKING FINDIh"3Z IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201- 252 -01, 03, 04, 21, 22, 39, 40-43. A. Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for General Plan Amendment. No. 89 -OIC as described in the :"itle of thl- Resolution.. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General P16 Amendment is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On January 25, 1989, the Planning Commission of the city of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. (III) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. S. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Comission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part 'A , of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presen +ed to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on January 25, 1989, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a) The application applies to approximately 10 acres of land, basically an L "- shaped configuration, located on the south side 0 Lewn extending approximately 1,100 feet east of Archibald Avenue anO the parcel on the north side of Highland and extending 780 feet east of Archibald Avenue and is predominantly vacant. Said property is currently designated as Medium, Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre; and <0 PLANNING :.OWISS14N RESOLUTION NO. GPA 89-014 - City of Rancho Cucamonga January 25, 1989 Page 2 S E b) The property to the north of the subject site is designated Lori Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) and is single family residential. The property to the west is designated Low Residential and is single family residential. The property to the east is lesi 3 =sated low Residential to the north half and Medium Residential to the south half and is vacant to the north half and undeveloped to the south half. The property to the south is designated Low Residential and is rural single family residential; and c) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies Of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and This amen(kseat does promote the goals and objectives of the Lar. Jse Element; and e) This amendment would not be materially injurious o- detrimental to- the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. K-sed upon the substantial evidence presented to this commi;tsion during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concltides as follows: a) TSat the o0ject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and b) That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and c) That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. ibis Commission hereby finds that +.he project has been reviewed and considered for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and this Commission recommends the issuance of a Negative Declaration by the City Council. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 25th day of January, 1989, General Plan Ahendment No. 89 -01C. G. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall cerw fy to the adoption of this Resolution. 1V I— Jr PLANNING COWIS$ION RESOLUTION No. Jan ary 2C Jan - City of Rancho Cucamonga uary 25, 1989 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1989. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: arry - e , a rman ATTEST: ra u er, "cre ary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning COMISsidn of the City of Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoll.g R(Asolution was Rancho daffy and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning COWission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of January, 1989, by the following vote -to -snit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Al --,- ? L DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUC".ONGA STAFF REPORT January 25, 1989 Chairman and Member., of the Planning Commission William J. Silva, Deputy! City Engineer Chuck Mackey, Associate Civil Engineer street circulation pattern within subarea 8, located north of Arrow Route, between the I -15 Freeway and Etiwanda Avenue, necessitated by a proposed MWD power genera;tfng plant at the northwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route. 229- 021 -59 and 229- 031 -15, and show access points for the block bounded by Foothill Boulevard on the north, Arrow Route on the south, 1 -15 Freeway on the west, and Etiwanda Avenue on the east, necessitated by a proposed MWO power generating plant at the northwest corner of Etiwanda and Arrow. I. ABSTRACT: These applications request amendment to the Industrial Specific Plan (ISP) and is the Foots A Boulevard Specific Plan (FSp) to change the proposed local indus'. -ial street system of subarea 8 of the ISP and propose access options for various FSP light industrial parcels which contain a land use iption for regional related commercial usage. This action will serve to mitigate the access questions for this area caused by the proposed MID power generating plant at the northwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route and is recommended by staff. II. LOCATION: The application site is located in the vicinity of Footh114 Boulevard, I -15 Freeway, Etiwanda Avenue, and Arrow Route (see figure A),. North - Regional Related Commercial and Commur. ty Commercial South - Heavy Industrial East - Community Commercial and Residential West - I -15 Freeway ITEMS O,P J PLANNING COMISSION STAFF REPORT ISP 89 -01 FSP-89-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JANUARY 25, 1989. PAGE 2 y III. BACKGROUND: The decision by the Metropolitan Water District (MWO to build a bower genera';ing plant at the northwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and .crow Route has necessitated the re -study of the ISP and the FSP between I -15 and Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route. The ultimate MWD area will extend northerly approximately 2000 feet from Arrow Route and westerly approximately 2000 feet from Etiwanda Avenue, as shown on Figure B. In the FSP, the MWD project will occupy land designated as light industrial (LI) use. The proposed local street system must be changed to accommoda'a the MWD project. This local street system is shown on the ISP map for subarea 8 (Figure C). Shown was a proposed east -west street, Devon and an unnamed proposed street from Arrow Route to Devon, extending through the proposed MWD project. Due to the nature of the project, these pzt -posed streets cannot be constructed. The proposed street, Devon, ran -along the south boundary of the FSP and north boundary of the ISP, thereby providing access to the planned industrial use areas. Therefore, the proposed local street system needs to be re- studied. The existing and proposed land uses for the study area are shown on Figure B. Access to the Regional Related Cowmercial (RRC) land use is p=Tavided by Foothill Boulevard which is consistent with the FSP. MWD can be provided access from Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route via driveways. The chemical plant at 12550 Arrow Route has drlveway access from Arrow Route. Parcel 22902159 (proposed Plies project) fronts Arrow Route for access. However, this is a deep parcel extending north to the I -15 right -of -way with land area in both the ISP and FSP. The proposed street, Henley, was shown on the ISP Subarea 8 map extending from Arrow Route to Devon providing access to this parcel. Parcel 22903115 and the west half of parcel 22903116 lose access to Etiwanda Avenue by eliminating Devon easterly through the MWD project and to Arrow Route when Devon, to the west of the MWO project, is eliminated. These parcels are zoned LI in the FSP. The FSP indicated that parcel 22903115, and the north portion of parcel 22902159 (proposed Plies project) which extends north of the ISP into the FSP could be used for regional related commercial uses if appropriately master planned. The proposed Plies project shows industrial uses only. IV. ANALYSIS: A. Proposed Chanpe to the Future Local Street System In the condition before the MWO project, the industrial uses on the southtrly part of the FSP and on the northerly part of the ISP re�e►v: access by th2 proposed Devon Street. 0 140- o2- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ISP 89 -01; FSP -89 -01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JANUARY 25, 1989: Y PAGE 3 ' In the after condition, only the western LI parcels need access. The access question is made complex by the fact that m�vt of the remaining LI contains an option for RRC if appropriately roaster planned. IF this LI is developed as RRC, then access should be by Foothill Boulevard and /or Etiwanda Avenue. IF the parcels are developed LI, the access should be by Arrow Route through a loca: industrial street system. In other words, the type of access provided these FSP LT parcels will be dependent on whether they develop as RRC or I.I.. In any case, Henley and the westerly part of IY =.on eiast be replaced by a suitable laical industrial street system. This new street system must meet the following criteria: 1) It cannot terminate in a cul-de -sac longer than SOU feet. 2) It shall provide adequate access to parcel 22902159 (the proposed Plies Project), Since parcel 22902159 averages 1800 t feet in depth, a loop street system approximately 1200 feet in depth is proposed, as shown in Figure 4. If parcels 22903115 and 22903116 develop LI in the F'SP, then access shall be obtained from the ISP circulation system in th4 form of an attached cul -de -sac serving these parcels, as show on Figure E. This proposed cul -de -sac should run up the west property line of .: parcel 22903116. The estimated traffic volumes for parcels 229+2159, 2290315 and 2290316 assuming light industrial use are: TOTAL 2745 392 409 PH AN VPQ/ PH Peak A14 Peak Peak Hr. Peak Hr. Parcel # Acres AC VPHIAC VPH /AC VP0 {VPH) (VPH` 22902159 37.8 51.8 7.4 7.7 1958 281 293 22903115 10.0 51.8 7.4 7,7 518 74 77 22903116 5.0 51.8 7.4 7,7 259 37 39 (West half) TOTAL 2745 392 409 PLANNING LOM1ISSION STAFF REPORT ISP 89 -01; FSP,89 -01 -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMORGA JANUARY 25, 1989 PAGE q The proposed ISP local street systen can readily handle this volume of traffic. The lcvei of service will ba very good. It parcel 2,x'903115 and/or the northerly part of parcel 22902159 develop as RRC, then access shall be obtained from the FSP circulation system in the form of private streets and driveways by access from Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue. The FSP, subarea 4 circulation concept plan shows a major driveway access and median opening to the RRC land on Foothill Boulevard about half way between L Owanda Avenue and the 1 -15 Freeway. While other driveways could be installed along Foothill Boulevard, the mid - location would be the major focus for developing an adequate internal circulation system for the RRC land use. If parcels 22903115 and/or -6he northerly, part of 22902159 develop as RRC. adequate access should still;te available because to develop as RRC, a master plan could be sequined, wart of which would be a Iaffic analysis dotero0ring feasibility and planning for adequate A rculation. Addis )pally, MWD is planning to re, ,rve an access easement to parce) 22903115 that crosses the MWD project at its northerly boundary from this parcel east to Etiwanda Avenue. IF this parcel develops LI, adequate public street access has been planned to this parcel-which is the proposed street system to Arrow Route. IF this parcel develops rlRC, this driveway on Etiwanda can be, ° used th access all of the RRC land, including parcel 22903115. le.r, driveway should be designated joint -usage for RRC and N1�o prajects, to insure ;adequate driveway spacing along with adequate access on Etiwanda Avenue. The optional access for RRC land use option is 0g4i; on Figure F. B. Proposed_Changes Therefore the following changes aria options are recommended; ESP: 1, Delete Devon, Heney and the unnamed proposed street from the ISP, subarea.8. 2. Add the proposed local loop street systm north of Arrow Route as discussed, shown on Figure D. 11 PLANNINU COMISSION S.41 REPORT ISP 89 -01; FSP V -01 4 CITY CF RANCHO cUCAmongA JANUARY 25, 1929_ PAGE 5 1 ".1 . ISP and FSP: Option ai If parcels 22903115 and /or 22903116 located in the FSP develop as Li usage, then access shalt be taken from the proposed ISP local loop street system in (2) above as Cul -de -sac not to exceed 600 feet as shown on Figure E. Option b) If povicels 22403115, 22903115 and /or the northerly half of 22902159 located in the FSP develop as RRC usage, then access shall be Laken from the proposed FSP accessr.= provided along ,Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenu,;, as s►,ow on Figure F, Additionally, if the north pa0t. of parcel 22902159 develops as RRC, the RRC project shall be designed to allow only service vehicles access from the ISP lq%n streetn_ The intent of options a and b is to insure that RK access is obtained from Foothill Eoulwrrd and Etiwanda Avenue and "aa<t LI access is obtainO from Arrow Route via the loop str if parcels wvelop different land. uses, their access it be determined by the tvpe of land use developed as defined above. WI RONMENTAL; In conjunction iith the application, an Initial Study /Prelitidnary Environmental Ass *gsuent, in conformity with the requirements of the California Envir . -1tal nuality Act has been prepared and the proposal would have no s canf jd�aerse effect an the enviroiment. Therefore, the PInnnina Con. , &V make a finding of no significant impact on the environient PVL Alwfid certiftcation of a Negative declaration. VI. FACTS FOR FINDINSS: a) The amendment does not conflict with the circulation policies of the Industrial Area Specific Alan or of the Foothill Specific Flan; and b) The amendment promotes the goals of the Industrial Area Specific :an and of t�e Foothill Boulevard Specific Flan; and c) The amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ISP 89 -01; FSP 89-01 • CITY IF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JANUARY 25, 1989 PAGE 6 VII. RECOMMENDA :ON: Staff recomms-as public 'nearing discussion of the proposed Industrial Area Specific <lan and Fcotttill Boulevard. Spacific Pl;*,n Amendment. If the Pl'annir- : Commission agrees with, the above Analysis and Facts for Finding, ''canning Commission shduld adopt the attached resolutions in suppor. or the amendn*nt to the Industrial Area Specific Ian and Wnandment to the Foothill Boulevard SpPelftt Plc- Respectfully siftitted, William J. Silva, P.E. Deputy City Engineer ,CMesd hments: Figure A - Vicinity Map Figure E : Proposed and Existing Land Use Figure C - ISP Subarea 8 Figure D - Proposed St,,^eet System for ISP Figure E a Proposed Assess Option for Parcels 22903115 and 22"43116 if developed as Light Industrial Figure F - Proposed Access Optio;q for Parcels 22903116, 22903116 and Northerly Part of 229 -2169 if developed as Regional Related Cownftial EI Mi ui C D U Al Y C Qom. m f� O Z. 1 G: } 11 a I o m LL I �bG 11 (� cl 0 P- I I I t .x .o < ;z o 'u ,Q iz ix I • �II ip � Wfi c. ■ L.. ri Lull � f saw ■r � 1 1 AVG • V o-. "2 I v J w + Vt %L c.J II i Y C Qom. m f� O Z. f 1 a: G: lM a I o m LL it (� Q 0 P- k i Q. .a w w M w Ile roer�eua LL u w ry ;3 ai a y G: a i4 ,C iX (� Q a .x .o < ;z o 'u ,Q iz ix W W Pr IO � 0 • V o-. "2 w + u i i QA s i a ®1i0�1�116R�llf�i ui i Ile so ( /J,� .s. d / Q p N a N Mul b�e'Nrd 113 i�s7vTS' I i /i /IOIPdJJ',IJIIPJsFIJ /dJI ®I �YY a d I i� $» .. � Ll � « . > .� � @ m % � \ k ! d I a I t . . } fa ; $ .� �■ , | 110 k a�. e f s a ireNV.d /�� dO�.An%e'.►xole•.m" n � : C' 1sdao'. 7'. Z* C2rJt'. s" a".6"C'C.S'�'.oco'ci- .�i��.c'T: d _ fi E9G1!ffiGfdE^aE]t 1 lJe a� cc 131 a q p, _ !3 p r3 LL Q j o v ON q 0� Q h t Ei q 13 4 c U 13 f Ct _, p f�16fiP �f111li ffff,f}fs aofs ffrfr flo fTl 4lPP irs BP� s0� Cf�aG,t�f�e�: t rr n q o R j 0 4 X13 J 0� o ®, ©' �� t a M a c 13p © 1 Q �' /pdd�� doca•. c' do'- ca ►a*�dO.osTermoet^cdis�.ccdr7c,1 N � q cc z of a El. 131. Lt. j a LPL I7 fa Z N t U6 W V 1 J uj rig WA r----EOW fl1 � SiPPY ®�Y IYY® C� - 1. Lj p Cc o �'� / 4 6' ILL e ;` ' �� =� Fj��OdN.@'iT'd�/'iT.Pd'd ?l. �'. CEC' 1T�T$• d�' d' d'. i�' i5' 2 '.Cf•°C1Y�.i76P.Cli",i^.6'FCL°! �', 13 L"iLtL"flt CS E3C3lSOj�a �l q0`1 ns ri P 0 Q Ile 13 f rl v 13q flg u , i4.L1e lz 4 L 13 o s I� 1 I a .l MONS 1' +r w' i 0 cy Z C. UJ f UJ UJ • cc CL y • IL I a .l U. W� 2 o) cl z cc Q o LL z M e �0z p0. N V V ^ (• LLI yj M LU LU c0 oc J � w c 4 0 lJL Ift l a a 0 i IL �°' : vewvdu3 0 v � rr a, e �r ar rsi.Qj c 1 % a _g 1 I 1 S al J N . V 4 Q� uJ ® ®°e� ■ IL Nn uj r l a. i I i ® 3 n I 1 El El i. i RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, R:C0MF16NDING APPROVAL OF ENYIROWE:NT ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 89 -01, REQUESTING TO MOD-FY THE LOCAL STREET CIRCULATION PATTERN WITHIN SUBAREA 8, LOCATED NORTH OF ARROW ROUTE, BETWEEN THE I -15 rREEWAY AND ETIWAHDA AVENUE, NECESSITATED BY A PROPOSED MWD POWER GENERAtING PLANT AT THE NORTW4=1 CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE IN RANCHO W, AMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. M The City of RanchA Cucamonga has filed an 4ppiication for Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendm:nt, "No. 89 -01 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in thi's pasolution, the subject Induzzr -ial Area Specific Plan Amendment is referred �,ri as "the application ". (ii) On January '25, 1989, the Plannifig Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. !iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. HOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the P1antaing Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ai. follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A ", of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on January 25, 1989, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follow-q: a) The proposed l -70 power generating plant at the northwest corner of Arrow Route end Etiwanda Avenue necessitates modification of the proposed local industrial street system. Therefore, public access requirements necessitate the modification of said local system as shown on the attached figures. b) The property north of the subject site is designated Light Industrial with an optional Regional Related Commercial usage. The property to the west is the I -15 Frc -eway. The property to the east is designated Community Commercial and Residential. The property to tho seith is designated Heavy Commrcial; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ISP 89 -01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JANUARY 25, 1989 PAGE 2 r 1 c) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d) This amendment does promote �,he goals and objectives of the. Industrial Area Specific Plan; and e) This amendment Could not bn materially injurious or detrimental 20 the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties and that a negative declaratiom,�be issued. 3. i;azed upon tho substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby fines and concludes as follows: _ a) The amendment does not conflict with the Circulation policies of the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and b) The amendment promotes the goals of the Circulation Element of the Industrial Aren Specific Plan; and c) That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan; and d) The amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. 4. This Commissfia. hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered for cczpliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and further this Commission recommends the issuance of a Negative Declaration by the City Council. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to �.Nction 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City, of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 25th day of January, 1989, Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment No. 89 -01. 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. 11 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ISP 89.01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JANUARY 25, 1989 . PAGE 3 r APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF JAW ", 1989. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: arry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Braa Sul er, ecru ry I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the j City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of January,-1989, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: �i �v Ca m r rw s.rr��wr :rret�c��srrrr�r �t�■ /milli } 13 Bit RQ \ a i 113 N p r ^ S k 0 I �Q 413 m �carm�avrv� ®rr��rr�ra+.vmo1 Amav�vrr �Qa1,vA �1 1 V 1113 p t [3 I� 4 w v® \ El i4• fal- mom= ®®vearreee1 Q _ Zj :� A s tr�stip�sv� o I a 4� KII Zr a 3 El 4 1 A ba �113 � ar�racaeacaeaM p I o � — o � Q 0 1 a� I I 1ia� N x1 Il N ii � 11 Q� oQ j . aw. raav .:rvr�caav�ravvooarro.�oaa.�r � Ciaoc• s v sE 14 + w i7 D p 1• ��i!� N �1 QED r o!A V $El S. :13 + d ° V Q G $roarrr :u aQ 4' O Qy A 00 43 z �1 'n D 1 f N 'y I o� s_ I oia Q e Gp1 � 4 13 i1 4 .° aG 3 a 4 1� a 0 fj u' -• 13 4 l f� - >Vagraggy Fa" rvvaar :.ar.�..arrssrr. �aa DaC7 CS L�00 d� Q f N 'y I o� s_ I ' M O T 0 i .. tK Q r M M y w :% m ��® \ 0 0 rl i' > 1 � s ItI . • s e/ i� e� �t o it 4 0 0 tn ,A cn Q cn "n U, C RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMtiEISSIC2 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPR3VAL OF ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT At!) 'FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN .MENDMENT 89 -01, REQUESTING TO MODIFY TaE REGIONAL RELATED COMMERCIAL LAND USE OPTION FROM APP: 229- 021 -59 AND 229- 031 -15, AND SHOW ACCESS POINTS FOR THE BLOCK BOUNDED BY FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ON THE NORTH, ARROW ROUTE ON THE SOUTH, I -15 FREEWAY ON THE WEST, AND ETIWX4DA AVENUE ON THE EAST, NECESSITATED BY A PROPOSED MWD POWFR GENERATING PLANT AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ETIWAADA AVENUE AND APROW ROUTE IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AND PEAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Foothill Boulevard .specific Plan Amendment No. 89 -01 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On January 25, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, 'tlHEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and 'resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part W, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on January 25, 1589, including written anv oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a) The Fr-op)sed MWD power generating plant at the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue necessitates modification of the access provid64 the light industrial parcels on the southerly ' part of subarea 4 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Since these parcels also contain a land use option to develop as regional related cowrcial, access options are proposed which are dependent on which lanS use develops, as shown on the attached figures, Ind PLANNING COMMISSION - RESOLUTION NO. FSP 89 -01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JANUARY 25, 1989 PAGE 2 b) The property ► " of the subject site is designated Regional Related Commercial usage. The property to the west is designated the I -15 Freeway. The property to the east is designated Commur:ity Commercial and Residential. The property to the south is designated General Industrial; and c) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d) This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Ptan; and e) This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties and that a negative declaration be issued. 3. Based upon the substantial c.idince presented to this Commission, is during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth -in paragraph 1 aai 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a) The amendment does not conflict with the Circulation policies of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and b) The amendment promotes the goals of the Circulation Element of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and c) That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan; and d) The amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. 4. This Commission herehy finds that the project has been reviewed and considered for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and further this Commi.asion recommends the issuance of a Negative Declaration by the City Council. 5. Based upon the findings and con,' -ns set forth in paragraph 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Section 55850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, tnat the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recebsends approval on the 25th day of Is January, 1989, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. 89 -01. 6. The Deputy Secretary to this Coi:;sion shalt certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. FSP 59 -03 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JANUARY 25, 1989. PAGE 3 Y APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1989. PLANMING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: at rry E , a r(f an ATTEST: I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly ard regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of January, 1989, by tho- following vote^to-ttit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES, COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ° • �3\ 13m q El N rI E3 ® R7 pd Q ©s � e 13 o• U d b EJ o 11 EI: y 13 0 0• S 0 4 no J � �a I� o Ede v fie• I ` �fo_ smG Ye�Z c LJ * e + pQ 4 :sDo S7 h ' r pe O � e °e 130 a t � 130 h a Q 4 � pe CI � 0 t9' /r��p Via" cil $ orEirmarso�►a..s►- -- - a---n- - ----cc `O�' 0 E 13 ps ci n El z 0 In [9 W V het ®m ®� n IBM lip O e� `1 e �0. ui bi. LL iog J J e r LL 0 c I�E Z 0 Q !ii tfa J UJ M 4 09 t C3 CM \ rj W LL ° • �3\ 13m q El N rI E3 ® R7 pd Q ©s � e 13 o• U d b EJ o 11 EI: y 13 0 0• S 0 4 no J � �a I� o Ede v fie• I ` �fo_ smG Ye�Z c LJ * e + pQ 4 :sDo S7 h ' r pe O � e °e 130 a t � 130 h a Q 4 � pe CI � 0 t9' /r��p Via" cil $ orEirmarso�►a..s►- -- - a---n- - ----cc `O�' 0 E 13 ps ci n El z 0 In [9 W V het ®m ®� n IBM lip O e� `1 e �0. • •I A> 0 2 0. cm N 4 ri>r • 0 CL "�, ® �/ miaow � wso.�s ®eisisr ® ®® ®o ® ®�.�ra►s��r 3 d all s • 3 D�- z3 I • '010 Ixi• ■o®�5�� R M• 0 �o • U. Of ®• oC rj ■e m o ®s ire • •I A> 0 2 0. cm N 4 ri>r • 0 CL "�, ® �/ miaow � wso.�s ®eisisr ® ®® ®o ® ®�.�ra►s��r 3 d all s • 3 D�- z3 CIT; OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA G`��oh• S rA �'' REPORT _ � r Q DATE: January 25, 1989 U tsn TO: Chairman and Memb,.rs of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dan. Coleman, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONNWAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA C&MMUNITY PLAN 88-05 - WILLIAM LYON COMPANY XWMROT - rev son o tan use and circulation a ec ng approx mately ISO ayes for Phase One of the Village of Victoria Lakes South, bounded by Base Line Road to the north, Miller Avenue to the south, the easterly boundary of the Victoria Planned Community to the east, and the Southern California Edison corridor to the west; and various amendments to land use and circulation to reflect "as- built" conditions within the Villages of Windrows, Vineyards and Groves. 1. ABSTRACT: The proposed amendment affects land use, density and c rca ulatibn within Phase One of The Lakes village. Staff is requesting Commission review and recoamendation of approval to the City Council. 11. BACKGROUND: The Victoria Planned Community, which was approved in 19811 was conceived as a ser0s of four villages. This amendment is the first step toward the eventual development of the final village known as "The Lakes ". Essentially, this amendment is the outgrowth of the planning process for the first "Area Development Plan" for The Lakes. This amendment is necessitated by revisions to land use and circulation affecting approximately 30 acres. A subcoa nittee of the City Council and Planning Commission was formed to provide direction on maor issues and policy areas during the formulation of the village plan. The proposed amendment is consistent with their recommendations which are discussed later on. 111. SIRMARY OF PROPOSED Ate: The proposed plans for Phase One er significantly rom a original Victoria Community Plan, as described belay±. The original concept for The Lakes is shown in Exhibit. "A" as contrasted with the current concept shown in Exhibit "B ". A brief summary of the proposed amendment is contained in the pt•eface of the attached booklet. ITEM Q 1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VCPA 88 -05 - WILLIAM LYON January 25, 1989 Page 2 A. Land, Use: The proposed amendment woula lower densitias overall �s't half. The proposed density of 12.48 dwelling units per acre (du /ac) is compared to 24 du /ac in the original plan. A detailed breakdown of land use changes is contained in Tabled of the attached booklet. The TVi aving major changes from the original plan are noted bet ow; 1. Eliminate 35 acres of High Residential (24 -30 du /ac) that bordered the lake on the west side. The proposed . amendment would add 31 acres of Low Medium Residential (4- 8 du /ac) and 28 acres of Medium High Residential (14.24 du /ac). Staff Comment: The reduction in density is the result of a shift in marketing emphasis towards higher priced single family homes along the lakf> edge and is related to the timing of the regional mail as discussed below. The elimination of approximately 383 dwelling Ynits will also reduce traffic volumes in the Immediate area and reduce impact of development upon schools. 2. The Regional Related Office/Commercial land use category is proposed to be reduced from 26 acres to 4 acres, The original plan had Regional Related Office /Commercial bordering approximately one - fourth of the lake edge. Staff Comment- The ability to market office /commercial space waste fted directly to the development of the regional malt which has been significantly delayed. The applicant has adjusted land uses so that Phase Ono of The Lakes may develop now independent from the regional mall. The proposed plan preserves 4 acres of land at the south end of the lakes for two future restaurant sites. More than 100 acres of Regional Related Office /Commercial land use will still exist around the regional mail in proximity to Foothill Boulevard and Day Creek Boulevard. 3. The church site located on the west side of the Heublein Plant has been redesignated as "Community Facility". Staff Comment: The Community Facility land use would a"Tlow r a Broader range of possible uses for the site. Typical uses allowed, subject to a Conditional Use Permit, include churches, child care facilities, convalescent center, and private schools. Qv.12 PLANNING C"IS1,,'ON STAFF REPORT VCPA 88 -05 - WIU AM LYON January 25, 1989 Page 3 Aft B. Circulation: The proposed amendment alters the circulation concept within the village by creating a T- intersection at the southerly terminus of Victoria Park Lane and Victoria Loop. The original concept had Victoria Park Lane terminating as a "traf°ie. circle" at a L- intersection which only permitted travel to the southeast. The criginal commiunity plan had Victoria Loop terminating as a cul -de -sac street on the south side of the Heublein Plant. The curvature of Victoria Loop east of Victoria Park Lane has been aftened from the original plan which was almost a right - angle ::urn. The amendment also reflects the deletion of the split - corridor concept for Day Creek Boulevard that was decided several years ago through detailed traffic studies for the regional mall. Staff Comment: The proposed T- intersection will improve traffic r, rcu ation through the village by allowing travel around the west side of the lakes. Staff supper" elimination of the traffic circle in favor of the safer T- intersection concept. By relaxing the curvature of Victoria. Loop, traffic flow will be improved and made safer. The former cul -de -sac street on the south side of the Heublein Plant created a double frontage situation which is not necessary because of available access from the frontage on Base Line. C. Lake Configuration: The shape of the lakes was been changed to _ ncrease their width to provide a less man -made appearance. The original concept featured two lakes, grade separated by a bridge in the middle. The proposed plan indicates two northerly lakes which are surrounded by trails and a 5 -acre park. The third, and smaller southerly lake, will lie between the two restaurant pads. Staff Comment: The proposed p,.i is largely the result of gra ng considerations. There is approximately 50 feet of fall between Base Line and Miller which complicates the lake design. Therefore, staff supports the proposed plan to create three separate lakes. 0. Park: The original community plan concept showed a 4 -acre ppuuMc park, on both sides of Victoria Park Lane, at the north end of the lakes. The proposed plan incorporates a 5 -acre park site on the west side of the upper lakes. Staff Comment: Staff supports the change in the park location because thie former location did not relate well to the lakes due to the intervening street. The proposed location i.• more central to the residential areas of The Lakes South and allows a design that can be integrated with the lake system. Q —3 PLANNxNG COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VCPA 88 -05 - WILLIAM LYON January 25, 1989 Page 4 Em E. Trails: The amended concept provides for lake edge trails aT'ng both sides of the 'fakes. In addition, a new trail was added along Miller Avenue w"T'r it could ultimately connect via Church Street to the Terra Vista trail system. Staff Commnen;., The trail concept is consistent with the original co`anurtity plan concept that "public access will follow the lake edges ".. IV. SUBCOfR RE ATIONS: The subcommittee consisted of two City- Counci.1 members gown, King, Buquet Aiternatel and two Commission members (Chitiea, Tolstoy, McNiel Alternate). The subcommittee process began in December of 1987 and culminated in August 1988. The subcommittee provided the following direction to the applicant and staff: A. Land Use: The subcommittee supported. the overall reduction it density -and arrangement. of land uses. Where there is Medium High Residential proposed adjoining Low Medium Residential on the east side of the lakes, the subcommittee recommended a trail as a bijffe;- to separate the two different land use densities. The applicant responded witty a greenbelt trail section with an average width of 50 feet (see Page 76a). B. Circulation: The subcommittee supported the wierall c rcu a on concept. The subcommittee had recommended that Victoria Loon not be connected to Miller on the west side of the lakes. The proposed amendment reflects this recommendation (see Page 771. C. Lake Configuration,- lice subcommittee matv the f:rfiowing recommendations which nre reflected in the amendment. 1. The lake element should !`P *etained without fencing. 2. The lakes should be designed for visibility as an important local feature. 3. Vehicular access to the lake should be carefully °ontrolled through proper land planning to maintain the lakes as a community featuro rather than a regional water element (e.g. - Guasti Regional park ). 4. The lakes should be designed for passive use with no boating of swimming. Fishing is expec".ed to be allowed. 5. The lake overtook concept (see page 73) was accepted as presented subject to trail connections. I 0- `i PLANNING COWISSrON STAFF REPORT VCPA 88-05 - WILLIAM LYON. January 25, 1989 Page 5 6. The east side of the two upper lakes should be designed with more rustic materials and more naturalized plantings. Elements such as large boulders in the lake edge were discussed. 7. The lake water element should extend down to Miller e:Jnue. 8. The concept of a lake overlook should be retair -ld. g. Provide a mirror image water element flanking the entrance drive to the two restaurant pads (see Page 81). D. Park: Tho jubcommftte:* recommended that a 5-acre public park Se—provided with parking for approximately 100 autos (see Page 76ai. The park should include picn?c tables. In addition, the park should include a maintenance building and storage yard for both the lake and the park. E. Trails: The subcommittee made the following recommendations ave been included in the proposed amendment: IV 1. Provide a trail around both sides of the upper and middle Takes and along the east side of the lower lake, 2. The easterly trail should be a natural material, such as decomposed granite, and wide enough (approximately 12 feet) to accommodate maintenance and security vehicles. 3. The easterly restaurant pad should be elevated ,hove the lower lake with the trait running along the lake edge below within a thirty foot greenbelt. 4. The traits should accommodate pedestrians and bicyclists. E V. EXVIRC MffAL ASSESSM9T: Staff has completed the required Initial Study and concluded at there are no significant environmental impacts associated with the proposed amendment. It is notel that an Environmental Impact Report was prepared and certified for the original Victoria Planned Community. V1a RECO!MUDATION: Staff is seeking a recommendation of approval to ie— `council through adoption of the attached Resolution recommends that the City Council issue a Negative Declaration. Q -5- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VCPA 88 -05 - WILLIAM LYON January 25a 1989 Page 6 Resp,ect+11y s T ed, B dB r City 1 nner BB:OC:ko Attachments: Amendment zq Phase One Victoria Lakes South Bookl4t Exhibit "A" - OrIginal Village Concept Exhibit "B" - Prc osed Village Concept Resolution Ordinance (Includes Full Copy of Amendment) 11 - • W RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLM!NING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIWNGA, CALIE=UNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -05, A REVISION TO LAND USE AND CIR;JLATION AFFECTING 130 ACRES FOR PHASE ONE OF THE VILLAGE OF VICTORIA LAKES SOUTH AND VARIOUS AMENDMENTS TO LAND USE AND CIRCULATION TO REFLECT "AS BU!LT" CONDITIC.NS .WITHIN THE VILLAGES OF WINDROWS, VINEYARDS AND G0VES, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF WHEREAS, on the 26th day of January, 1989, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65654 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1. The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the fol l owing—fin- als: 1. That the Amendment will provide for development of a comprehensively planned urban community within the District th,it is superior to developumnt otherwise allowable under alternate regulations; and 2. That the Amendment will provide for development within the District in a mannQr c%;n4istent with the General Flan and with elated develaa:ment and growth management policies of t`.:., City; and 3. That the Amendment will provide for the construction, Improvement, or extension of transportation facilities, public utilities, and public services required by development within the District. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has Found that this pro ec w not create a - ignificant adverse effect on the enviranment and recommends to the City Council the issuance of a Negative Declaration. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65865 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Victoria Community Plan Amendment 88 -05. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Victoria Community Plan Amendment 88 -05 to modify the Community Plan per the attached Cirdinance. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. VCPA 88 -05 - WILLIAM LYON January 25, 1989 Page 2 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1989. PLANN',V- CCAMI5SION OF THE CITY OF R!NCHO CUCAMONGA BY: arry T. M c e , 4e g:nan ATTEST: Brad Buller, !Te-cretary I, Brad. Buller, Secretary of the Planning CamA ssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and I regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rejicho Cucamonga, at a revular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of January, 1989, by the following wte -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSION'RS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSDJT: COMMISSIONERS: I 0 . _ ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA,;ONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLP41 W,ENu "'ENT 88-05, A REVISION TO LAND USE AND CIRCULATION AFFECTING 130 ACRES FOR PHASE ONE OF THE VILLAGE OF VICTORIA LAKES SOUTH AND VARIOUS AMENDMENTS TO LAND USE AND CIRCULATION TO REFLECT "AS uUILT" CONDITIONS WITHIN THE VILLAGES OF WINDROWS, VINEYARDS, AND GROVES The City Ct!� ,untii Of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, C-1 ifornia, does ordain as follows SEMON I: The City Council hereby finds and determines the followings A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing hel in the time and mamer prescrib =d by Tara, recomrtk, ds that Community .plan text amendment hereinaft— described, and this 0ty Council had held, a public bearing in the time and manner, prescribed by taw and duly heard and considered said recommendation. S. That this Com`F-:urnity Plan text amendment is consistent with r)e Gerre-al Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. That this C=murity Plan text a. endmant is consistent with the Development Code of the City of R- - 1, ^, ucamonga.. O. This Community Plan to -z amendnent will have no significant envirormentai impact as i'rovides in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 2s The Vluzoria Giffmunity Plan text and graphics is hereby amended as n caTed on the attached Exhibit "A ". J , - -RECEIVED- COY PlA1MN��7G OMS Mt JAN 6 ALI ME rah Z t AMENDMENT TO PHASFE ONE VICTORIA LADES SOUTi+ DECEMBER 13iW Cl OMIT moirly, 91 ` 6" f D Ask IxTROBQCraox The following text represents an amendment to Phase one of the Village of 71ctoria Lakes South contained within the Victoria Community Flan. This amendment is necessitated by revisionc to land uses and the circulation system affecting approximately 130 gross acres. This Phase One area of Victoria Lakes South is bounded by Baseline P.oad to the nostha Miller Avenue to the south, the easterly boundary of the Victoria Community Plan to the east and the Southern California Edison Essement P.O.W. to the west as shown below. III � � 1 M .i. ��i f Generally, the current amendment for Phase'one reflects a decrease is in the intensity oZ land uses surrounding ':he lake features including the lowering of High-Density residential areas to Medium -High, Medium &Ad Low- Medium designations. The result is 383 lees dwelling units than the existing immunity plan as shown on Table 1. Regional belated office/'Commercial uses are also Laing revised and decreased by 22 acres to provide for Medium -High and Low - Medium residential areas. The remaining Regional Related uses in Phase One &re proposed to include umall scale commercial activity, such as rastaurants. Additional plan revisions include designating the church site 3n the northwest corner c Phase one as "Community Facility" and reconfiguration of the lakes, and the village park. The proposed plan also reflects revisions to the circulation system includinq a T- intersection at Victoria nark Dane And Victoria Loop Road, the extension of Victoria X4ap Road to Day Creek P.aulevard, and the daletion of tho split- corridor concept for Day Creek Soulw,ard. Thou% revisions are shown on the attached exhibits. All land uses within the Village of Victoria TAkes South, except for Phase one, reXai.n as gar the previous Victoria Community Plan which was adopted by the City on May 29, 1981. It is expected that these uses and circulation will be amended if necessary to reflect any revisions that say occur with the phasing of developments The circulation system for those areas outside of Phase one will be consistent with the Foothill and Industrial specific Plans in regards to various roadway alignmentu including Day Creek Ijoulevvard and the interchange of Foothill Boulevard and Interstate 15. The Regional Center plan depicted with this application has been rtviewed by the city and should not be viewed a- the final design and is not a part of this amendment application. The following text is organized chronologically by only those pagers; from the original Victoria couxunity Plan that have bsen reprised.. q, 17 7 additional sores ct parkwax- associated with Victoria Park Lane are provided in the current project proposal. Table Z Vie _4 Lakes South - Phase One Statistical Summary Comparison Laid Use Current Existing Am�+� Coaaanuajty Pian Chacae Qde osiQI! ti0.9._ tugsl I�I,L A ME L Low -- -- 14 39 -14 -39 LM Low Medium 31 174 -- -- +31 +I74 M Medium 20 263 $ ISO +:2 +83 MR Mtdium. High 28 549 -- -- +28 +349 H High -< -- 35 Ilso -aS -I150 � Subtotal: (79) (986) ($7) (13.69) RR Regional Related 4 26 42 i Park s 4 Lake 19 20 -1 Trails I I 1 Parkway 10 3 +7 I Total: lit 986 111 1369 +7` -383 I 7 additional sores ct parkwax- associated with Victoria Park Lane are provided in the current project proposal. t CREAM% A RECM&TIONAIt TRAIL SYSTM THAT MIC t1 "ES ' PEDESTMY 1' BxLnecLE XqD M STRIM Cnt=ATIOR A system oZ trails will weave throughout the community, connecting residential areas to one another, and to the community open space system. The trails will connect the community with the regi.snal open space and trail system along Day Creek and Door Creek. The trail system will take various forms: sometimes along roads, between different land uses, through residential areas, or within open spacue corridors. It is a system which is adapted to its particular location yet ties together as an uninterrupted connecting. systexs. The diagram shows donceptually how the open space and trail system will work to accomplish t:is. UVA w #MVA$ 29 0-14 REMD DATE W will reipond to the existing rolling topography and each lane wiil:'undtalate independently, enhancing the "country t road" ambience of the parkway, The intent is to create a • road that Will bt a low volume, low speed residential parkway. t Local residential rok'4# in the community will connect to Victoria Park Lane ana the periph;.al arterial roads to encourage efficient traffic movement. Street tree planting will enhance the street'edgas. ILJ Fj f Noighborhood streets which sews individual neighborhoods will not be through streets, but 'will be cul -de -sags or loop roads to reduce through traffic and enhance the sense of neighborhood. The diagram below illustrate* the intent of the residential. circulation. L c! t16,. RWFWPS PPP 31 0--l5 RSMSED DATE [a 1:1 nyonal Cfrcgla� - ,r lul E; REWSED DACE V wm M UGM KODQRM Mww EjWWAW=M 44r" Mumm ..us" cry SJWW" PMAL r_�wuca wMe VCAMAM W� nMWOZYMU uw um lNr,*K"NA0=M%W rm 39 q- I REMSED DATE �l 0 A 'C2 XQtTm IA%tPR"=W.Tz % mu mw commm : r m :he character Victoria Lakes is t'ormed by the unique relatianahip or the residential, commercial and recreational land uses surrounding the lakes which become the vialagdP,s central open space.. The intent is to create a high quality, water related .community, with un active, people- orisntod water edge that serves 'the ;�aitlents of the victoria Lakes Village, the entire community of Victoria, and the City---t Rancho Cucamonga in general. '7EMAGE ENTAKY The most gracious entrance to residential portinnas or the Village is on Victoria Park Lane at Baseline. North of Baselines, Victoria Liner . Park's landscapes character and dawitn is similar throughout its a at ire l angth. South of Baseline, howaver, vtctorian Park tane takes on a rare Formal character, with regularly spaced trees. Victoria Park Lanes terminates at % large circular pedestrian plaza at the norfi� end of Korth Victoria Lake. There Will be t ],rks overlook at this poinu, a destination where pedestrians and biop lists can gather and look across tat open vista created by the lakes and lakes $ etdgetr. A conceptual plE_.z of the pedestrian plaza is -"hewn blow: PEDESTF 73 t q IZEMSE D DAB --- VICTORIA LASS LINK TM RESIDERTZAL AND COMMCIAL COpTN MaTY The lakes proposed for this Village will provide the visual and land ,;se connection bsts*een the residential, comm6rcial and aecreational facilities. aecauce of the change in grads, there will be a series o terraced laltes, each large enough to create a j dramatic visual impact. An illuw4rative drawing depicts haw the lakes night be arranged to accomplish the intent of this plan is shown on Page 77. North Victoria Lake is bordered by single- 1 family residential to the east and a p%blic park to the vast. Central Victoria Lake piovides lake frontage to multi- family residential to the west, single - family residential to the east, the park to the northeast and multi - family to the southeast. South Victoria Lake IS situated between multi - family residential land uses and regional rplatad uses. ppFai +e4x"" •�y„�,, AWAVW9W swklai avc ya ++ 401 r �9+�s�c ate, k��►i P�+w+�+a �VnU4 r�+ .wr, oc�v+m MW w Wta awl "°�1`�as1 c t --,' SMrd�r�Cu+or F1'°"` Cone �, ?_0 REVISEDOArc 76 _ A PUBLIC PMiK" AT J ORrx1 VIC ORIA LAIM Aicng the western 6,,ge of North Victoria Lake, a public park facility will be located. This park will serve the entire community and provide uses compatible with the charocter of the lake~. Lake edcjes will be public to Provide maxlnu*a access to this special park. A conceptual plan of the park and lake is shown on page 76a. ?REGIONAL RELATED US$.S ON LAKE EDGE The regional related uses adjacent to south Victoria Lake would be compatible with both the residential community to that eaorth and the regional center to the south. some commercial activity, such as restaurants, etc.,, would be appropriate in this area. Additional residential uses, should they bo necessary, would alLi be appropriate on the lake edge. TFAILS FOLLOW LMM SYSTEM INTO HW=1 OF THE P.�ItONAL CENTER The park and trail system of Victoria, Park Lane continues along the edges of the lakes. The trai ". system is expected to cross Miller and continue into the regional caister. Public access follows the lake edges north of Xiller. The quality of tho edge, that is, whatther it appears as a natural lake edge or an urban water edge, may vary. As one moves toward the regional center, there will be more opportunities for bulkheads and additional pedestrian plaza elements. The Natural Lake Edge cross - section shows a typical edge condition at thsa lake in th:3 residential areas along North Victoria Lake. A cross section depicting a portion of the trail system that connects the lake area to Victoria Loop Road between the residential areas east of the lakes is 1hown on ):-Aqe 76a. 76 0 _ 2- j REVISED DATE OPINE, W%c i or 7 TRAIL SECTION (See Page 77) 76a Z c. 12 El E. Rxi LA� L s" fta 760) Ij 4! 7 W 2-ZV 496 ILLUSTRATIVE CONCEPT PLAN VICTONIA LAKES SOUTH AND REGONAL !C-EW ER Victoria A Planned CommuM ty In Rancho Cucamonga '7'7 REVISED DATE �!djerss wwxuact IA— V Lads De tk i +a+0irlfe i�zic vii4 as ftfaa to Wftr wtj;"*4x G Natural Lake Tha rerAdontial land usou of this village ;'" le conslstent with the character f the solace that is lei � proposed. Residential don sities will rang& fro* Leow- M+edi= to Medium -High in this village. The Low- Kedium, re�ii.cie wtlal {IM }. designation ation allows from d to a dw*31.ing units ier acres. Thn �Odiuu -Hi.gh fi unity res' 4ential 14nd use category (AM Includto housing products in a range of 14 to 24 dwe.l, ngs per acre. of their location on tbq lako edge Masse dwellir. -}� will bs of quality character and hig:+ly desirable, matching their unique setting, y `, pis .cne �W�IdiM�l"",Mlaftlk✓` •wr `�'+ylGW�we� qr; .$ � �. � F� _1t�B1�` �... _ .. — _ _ mss•. - -�� ° �':,: '� '�' _ E mm 1 s� .- -_ V Lu { RR, ai RA am Im • '3e41 I { iNR RR �• ' VIC i ORLA. LAKES � 2[�OfldY7A1 I RJR r� �. • mww4wmm "OUJA 4. mmwm A -24OWA cotcmmcm ®iioeerntiiaare6acui XM wUpM AWA rMtWO MNATLY "M ' I � � iuo � r�s+inAxr�+cow+cxam . IU i I _�� 79 ^ 2 REMSED DATE { CIP aWrj` R i5 URBAN Focus goR "riCTORTA Yie6oria and ggG� e commercial tow of Cucamonga ionai center will be the the city of Rancho that •,ha reg which extands beyond it is important of the region ( �dino County San Berne- a active torminua of the to include western regional center fulfil- its cola as as an outstanding reg this wide opal- space system, and went stores and community-wide Th® array of dep tonal center w commercial ill .acility• typically fi.l's a reg in the that tyP carnmercial ectivitisa �f Ranc o Cucamonga, bath eredi.t to the City ohs revenue it provides be a great city, and `" center merchants• creates for the the regional center to image it collected by connects the through sales ta%es s ahem that -ce that will la,za 110d trail Y uniVe P The Pee-jstrl P this dsvelaPme�rt a and where many cnity will make Rancho �camangar the Community civic plaza for function as the Can oO - public functions theca illustrative diagram showing lace a`"s is an entry th"kt Vi,ll make this P on the following P ,, north to the regional of the center T; DEPT. .. . ... . .: � Ito].x .^ . c .� . A SP$CX" ENTRY TO TEM Fi AXO27AI, CSdi TR Fl`.e: h The main automobile entry into the center will be from tA* Devora Freeway and Vcoi;hili Boulevard. There is an #.pportunity to Create a special . entry inl�o the regional c*ntar. The drawing below is a typical cross- p#ction of Day Creel. Boulevard, located w("t of the center, show m; the 'I;ind, 09 planting that will help achievs the app "priaim o utry landiscapa. gar:9i . ru d woo us* d ,iwft �r r�k Y Cluk wani a V oorki' 104kei ' f 82 REVISED OATE L f : TY^{C AL REG'ONAL RELATED LAND USES The category called Regioaal Related Commercial and office Use includes those activi -Ies that typically orient themselves to a regional renter, bLc, for various reasons, do not need to be contained within the center itself. Below is a conceptual diagram teat shows how these vario'ue uses' may fit into as coLerent pattern. The illustration is not to be construed as a specifically proposed plan at this time. r vwui�rtrtiaL.: �+ t�l I � E v Ve : I" �„� sp cams.�rual 0/ F1111 e dL eio k" Lad nisi �- `� MEMO DATE arou++c dc& +r►s�rat -5-3 �- 4entcr v Ve : I" �„� sp cams.�rual 0/ F1111 e dL eio k" Lad nisi �- `� MEMO DATE Punic TRAASPOR2 MW MSS TMSIT Victoria will accomodtate several luvals of public traiisporta£ ion. At a; local level, mini -bus service on Victoria Park X ne could provide efficient community access to the regional center 4nd . related co=orcial and office uses from thsa rt414+7ential village$.e City -wide bus service on arterial road* will &*sure adequate connections to city services and facilities. Should rapid 'transit ji fa- ilities be built within this existing railroad right- of -gray, the playa prop -.**a a posxibl* location for a rapid transit natation st Baseline and may Crook Boulevard, s j_ 1 # liar e•lel� an time 7qt M41 MW xW IKeAr%l T r � i I sere SW aw*(WM � a low Jot ""` ? J1 I RENUD DAT properly designed Lake will, minimize percolation of wester into the ground water -table, so that actual not losses will only be die to evaporation. Thirst, the lakes aystam could use recycled water, should it btcomee available. The lake system is not usaed as a conveyance for project storm flows. During storm conditions, North and central victoria Lake inflows from direct precipitation over she water surfaoes and the surrounding la)ik edges can overflow and spill into South Victotia Lake from which flows are directed to Day Creesk.. Finally, a bS,dy of water of the size proposed by this plan will have a greater impact as a unique environmental amonity than an equivalent ariunt of well irrigated open spade, and at the rdame titre could result in a nit Water saving*. in the case of Rancho cucaaamonga, a iako solution is the most ross*urceful vay to develop an interesting and viable cor4m. unity center. EXTEDSIVE TRAIL SUTEM ENCOURAGES USE OF BICYCLES MW PZDESTRTANS Trail -systens work bast where they connect the community residents to the places they use **at. The trail system in Victoria is extensiVo and will provide the connection that will be meir>t useful to its rosidonta. Direct acc ose is provided to local parks and schools, to village commercial centers, to regional trails and open space, and to Esther villagos. on a reeliotnal level, connections will be made t � the community's ssajoar commercial ce3ntars, to the developing iudusststal centvy a-ad to neighboring Terra Vista. A Comunity Trail in planned e.:ong the north side of Miller Avenue that will connect the village is the greaenway trail in . Terra Vista. This system will Once >uragee bicyclon and pedestrians thereby reducing tats -,ob lee traffsc and iaprovs:ig air quality. 100 RLl'S5,il MATE ,. Mi r Aive4uo ENTRY HIERARCHY PLAN LE wor Come+ Entry Mater Re&identlal Entry sr.acw. Entry Mhw Oonw *y Entry MkW C The, Choy t kmm4y Aw sus tAo loc Am w spin tan& more WO mark, �m � into 9� �. - rrzl,Y' t grut 01*er p%ssa ,plc the, d4 x ,4 demmts of ghw awy B urnt , 4 e. ce�wpks mwwwww aid ii)w an ncr aeptpf 4e, Ivr 'e, p"ww�t OwWk. temp:- J rus 152 �- AEMSSO Date , I I i I �( REMSED DATE i A 0 0 0 °o °oaoaa °oa / S p,'Qr9 NF'ar°�rr�r�wwrriur� I Q003000 0° ° n c n 0 0 oco°oa4 0 0 0 »inO!M-mw- PL ANT PALETTE PLAN LEGEND w0amw STILE PLANTM 1 1 R ROAD mmm =,�.tr.�`r1yTM�1P Mlt� l "6.410 leVie+ Mall M" MW PROM' t ttbF1Y w I i " i°'°�' •�C. """ tin .�tt9rwR�lt.a1$77�f:•{wOip�Mt i Vietark Lisp i mow C:76'� Repana s;Irsslet fln•erraeeMWW" • eee3ss 9AW-1 If ai2 -4 10-1�2A°� �Esshgieknrusiatnrj SsI2p1c�.Ratiw ° °Q QQQ Local Residential Ploads ismama .1 umy W+ww. ft*"sl. i P•.e®d Comm ad"$ L Level ►ssbeslueete 4swAOM4 0 0 ��ei ®a0©0000000c 0 0 I 0 atl0.a oa opot c a ,1 0 o C 601. L--Vl Yi�iKA/ i�Vy�rr � R: 0 , OD 4 ex i Z � LOOP m ar G`L— .��ckla ixP✓. 1,9 AL EIN *a w e mx 9u q -3g REENASED DATE TYPICAL. _ EDGE CONDITIONS MILLIKEN, HIGHLAND, BASELINE, FOOTHILL Section at RG41dantlal Land U803 Plan y up a Semen --t '^oteltnsmW LmA U>rtes in i hrlm ..r ►rt1. rhr..w-s r 19 o' REVISED DATE El El 07 1-�92 o f- 5 -89 P Ace da o 4 of S DAY CREEK BOULEVARD Qrigiila1 POOr Ual6ty vu I l' L M a+ aw f RMSED DATE �. I } ETIWANDA AVENUE Original Poor Quality VICTORIA STREET r:tk, jw'Y MILLER VICTORIA LOOP 0 soh" 0. way WSW %a bomarawh so,vwm .FA REVISED DATE L2 1-11 171 PROVISIONS FOR MEETING CITY PARK REQUIRZKOM Victoria Park-Lane, victoria Groves Park, the parka in Victoria Vineyards, Windrows Park, the park /lakes in the Village of Victoria Lakes, and Paseos will be dedicated public land and will be maintained by a city wide ma;^stenance district. They will receive 100% credit toward meeting the park requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Privately owned and maintained open space that is provided for the use of the general public may rz=ive up to Soot credit toward meeting the park requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Privately owned open space that is not provided: for the use of the general .public may receive up to 100W credit toward meeting the park requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and shall meet the requirement of Crdinanea 105 of the City of Rana" Cucamonga. The following chart summarizes the distribution of park acreage in Victoria. It is based on actual and projected areas dedicated to park and open space. a • $4 a 54 .� ov poi j o a a a aa+ Neighborhood Park S 21 8 5 40 Victoria Park Lanr 4 20 12 10 46 community Trails 8 13 S 3 29 Lakes* 13 19 Total by Village 18 54 25 37 134 acres * Lakes (Water Surface Area) = 13 Acres Lake Edge Trail - 6 Acres Note: Acreages are rounded to the nearest acrd. 191 REVISED i.,1rATE ��35 M OW AL VICTORIA �OVES r LM , LMCA `m ` Off d, A97 4& V :. YARD% ou /rf! 6-k w ®eater • • ®w. w�w®•.ai�ea rrY MTRiBtM" PLAN i aA 0- _. w m w6vxnmlo OneE,,f lAo8amt'a* asa�i lg idYc,:,M �ti G4diea�ee euii.�rre�p�ry of eaYe•4wdaru,� �' � L� mra '�' !wL drHfls+y sit ARM AV � ffiee�bAfESt ]'i�tlk�'' %{� sa ldr�tN MUMC04 PC w" w i REMSED DATE 7 26* VAG If VICTORIA t I1IM� � rM'r0! i1- { ROWS Lm L r§14 UM It$ 446 w A6 r-Fg- NCO ° SM/ii 98l�GC M lM� _ U u 0 10g(,\ �ANIi I �2irr., ViCTOM LAK93 Uwe -.i flmm64 h*,& y� ( feoap�p�ddi�ylJ�uta ;�7fjxst>ax�wrsse� l4r+rta sass. gF we p+ydel 1� its q _. q I RMSEQ DATE r s • ss•°aev�spss +�® � • s ®•sass e • •s • Pseecssasws� l . sse s e s P ; o s s • tj_m r I=. mommommom"Now • 00 l ae ***so so s® a 40o00e04e6•6 , O 0 easesessa 90®0'9, ;�=/mm swam. 9 ANDARD ROAD CROSS - SECTIONS REFERENCE PLAN all p�1 REGIONAL CIRCULATION Day Owk Sor-lomasit MILLER & VICTORIA LOOP ooa ®o E'TIWANDA► & VICTORIA STREET +e•��s LOCAL RESIDENTIAL ROAD$ VICTORIA PARK LANE 242 .. REVISED DAIS: �I 0 O O ii••• aN•e•O• 9 - A i }ga s • ° A • A yfc g e • • s � a • e t vss•• 3� ° °oaem •say. g a e Los asesca•s•' g A A A v A.aeg o O f� Accora a r Loop r` 243 L43 0, w�a REMSED DATE 77 11 ANN � ii ¢ •1. + 6�.iD.st�i ICDIYrOCD t• � 1 � �i1�gii'�.gi i•y11• '1 p'6NIC7 4 1`I f � 31Cdwv0� � i 1 �'; 1 , Wit;°..,.. � - : ,�•._� ,,,, ►.wl° lam' 3 � � +le j '9 9•aw°"s °Nw' � +sq."�q. 'd i !,.�% 1 i ..#� '•J �oo°rWdO��''✓✓✓✓✓✓"'''' . w°sr ..wS'r y w°�°°iwwsNr' /Nti4 M140VY/ .ca � ors �� B� ! l� ILLUSTRATIVE CONCEPT PLAN 1 VICTORIA LAKES AND / REEGiONAL CENTER \/ �p 1/ idol A Planned C:OtTV1"tuni c • 1 ° Q=�M � °o Q wica9r ng a I"°tl land --7 I 77 E I 0 NW I � 9§06ft lip C fu Ago OW ILLUSTfRPATIVE CONCEPT PLAW VICTORIA LAKES SOUTH fv AND REGMAL CENTER Victoria A Planned Community in Rancho Cuor-manga 77 REMSED DATE CIrl OF RANCHO CtYCAMONGA Cv a�roq, r STA FF REPORT ��/� �9. o E, Z i DATE: January 25, x.989 U 1977 # TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Brett Horner, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: YARIAV %C V -11 - CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT - A request to reduce the minimum require average ar, scape setback, and to allow a 6-foot block wall in the required setback, within the utility district of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at the southeast corner of San Bernardino Road and klusman Avenue - APN: 206 -152- 20, 07, 09, 10, 11, and 19. i. ABSTRACT: The applicant is requesting a variance from the evelopment Code requirement for a 35 -foot average landscape setback (from curb face) along San Bernardino RcadSecition 17.10.040, Table 17.10.040 -B). I1. ANALYSIS: A. General: The Development Code average landscape setback requTemrement applies to all noro +residential secondary collector and local streets, which includes San Bernardino Road. A 35- foot average landscape aria is required, with a 25 -foot minimum area to be maintelned. The applicant proposes a consistent 20- foot wall setback area from the curb face to the 6 -foot high wall.. Although there are greater landscape setback areas on portions of the Cucamonga County Water District's property, the average landscape setback area with the wall as proposed (26.4 feet) is still well below tha 35 -foot average required. Thus, in addition to not meeting the minimum landscape setback for the new wall, the proposal dons not satisfy the average landscape setback. B. Facts for Findings�• The reasons cited by the applicant in the variance request Exhibit "A ") do not challenge the Development Code requirement for the street landscape setback. The applicant maintains that the proposal is consistent with their present development, will eliminate security and dur' problems, and will allow more usable space for future deve.„rhent behind the proposed wall. The applicant has not stated their IT��t PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VA 87 »1I - Cucamonga County beater District January 25, 1989 Page 2 _ Intentions for the area to be enclosed by the wall, but likely uses would be parking or storage. There is no question of the benefits of a wall to provide relief foam security and dust problems near the site. However, the location of the gall has no relationship to improving security or dust control, There is ample space in which to locate the wall at the required setback. Setbacks of existing walls and huildings in the general vicinity vary, but are at least 35 feet from the San Bernardino Road curb face ( including the fire station and the existing single family homes or. the north slot of the street). However, several properties do not meet the required setback, including the dairy (approximately 28 feet) and the china house (approximately 16 feet). In addition, on the north side of the st?eet, west of the fire station, a block wall has been constructed gust 12 feet from the curb face of San Bernardino Road, These structures were all built prior to the city's incorporation and adoption, of the Development Code setback requirement.. C. findings: in order to approve this variance request, certain i UR -9s"Tn the affirma0ve must be made. 1. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified.: regulation would result to practical difficulty or unne'essary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. 2. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions appl ;able to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. 3. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privilNg~s enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. 4. That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same. district. S. That the granting of the 'variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or aterially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. a L- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VA 87 -11 - Cucamonga County hater District January 25, 1989 Page 3 III. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Daily Re ort newspapey-and puLlic hearing notices were sent to al properties within 300 feet of`the subject site. IV. RECOMtENDATIAN: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny Variance r-i1T through adoption of the attached Resolution. If however, the Commission oieteraines that the proposal is acceptable, then staff should be directed to prepare a Resolution of Aprroval with specific findings. Resp ly su dQ Br d Bul N city .p ne BB:BH :vc Attachments: Exhibit "A" Letter from Applicant Exhibit "B" - Location Map Exhibit "C" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "D" Will Detail Resolution of Denial 'riance 87 -11 rt��i.�Yb, — ..-�/ 94 t d is a diagram of the properties that the District 1y owns, the property that we have in escrow# and the ies that we..irtend to 0,1 _re to ultimately meet the OP.l,''!�'fa� ��f'tC Y', N a requirements: for administration, maintenance, storage, 1 ( Yrty sing, parking and anything paitinent to our operations. iance that We requested on July 21, 1987, was a,,...Ired on at 9, 1907, requesting Eurthor details. It should be noted do not have any specific davelopment plans available at no, but that a variance if required, would be requested Far c actual development takes place. It is felt that the request should be grants, ',c the following reasons, That the proposed slumpatone wall is consistent with our prenant development, That the type of plantings and ground cover will be consistent with that requested by the City when we developed tht present facilities in 1980. ;hat we will oliminste all driveways to tt'. east of our present administration bdilding, therefore . eliminating in and out traffic to San Bernardino Road which at the Archibald intersection is very hazardous. It will eliminate the duet problems assoaated with the individuals usepir for in that after mischief different CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT individuals :use i" for general mischief and to park and go over to the daisy cn the coiner. ♦xa o....MMUO..a aro . -t -ono•. c•u, ♦.,Yao4Ya . ea a.ax .a.. .. our Distw!ct intends to have enough parking to v,cmaa cY+seww, ae,., ,,,., handle our staff and customers on -site in the future by the purchasing of the properties required. To deny the requested variance would reduce the Property useable for our development and create an uneconomical requirement. '. feels twat we have in the past cooperated with the loping chat we consider a very attractive headquarters Will continue to enhance the aesthetic appearance of r at this letter may not answer your taquiramonts in a manor, but does cover what you have requested. If meet what you apecifically red ire, please give us a this matter can be concluded at the earliest possible ighbors an San Bernardino Road from the drive - through homes on the north side have complained as to when we property secured. VATBR D25TAICr G DIVISION Original Poor Quality rwwr oss"I"low The Cucamonga County. Maur District is proposing . to construct a Dix foot high slumpstons wall across District property directly east of the exiatl.,9 office building. The wall will ::o located eight feet southerly of the street right of way and will create a fourteen foot Vida area between the wall and back of sidet:alk that Vill be landscaped to match the existing landscape currently in place Westerly of this area.. The District is desirous of constructing the wall to provide a acreen to the residential homes on the north side of San Bernardino Road, provide security rf District facilities and eliminate dust problems associated with general mischief that occurs after normal business hours. The Property south ;if the proposed wall slopes southerly to an existing allay. The only work to be performed on the property behind the wall will be to clear the property and tough grade maintaining the existing alope to the alley. ITEM YANIANCE 87~11 TITLE: -LEIIM FRO--M AE!j!W 11 SITE 0 NORTH CITY OF ITEM: vADIANGE 8719 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE-. LOCATION MAP PLANNING DIV18ION Y�"s EXHIBIT:. 6..... SCAL . ... ! FIRE STATION I EXISTING RESIDENTIAL HOMES t SAN BERNARD No ROAD -- — S [ PROPERTY LINE! — -- EXISTING _ OPOSED' - C n PARKING EXISTING r _ A Z WATER DISTk?CT r A ® x c o r c © M a m GAS STA. 11 BUILDING m exISTING x a I — D 1 x BUILD[NG E %ISr CNAtN -Liftl[ FENCE --F—__ F A EXISTING RESIDENTIAL o i wom7S � ESTACIA COUR7 _ 4 NORTH ITY ITEM: Rp CC ANNING DIVISION TITLE: WALL AND RETAINING WALL DETAIL /8 6, 1 ExisnivC SAN BERNARDINO ROAD t OF CUCAMO- NGA eNG DIVISICiN FINISHED I � 61 GRAD ITEM: CARIAixg H °SIT:. SCALE: _n ,4 r RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO `UCAMONGA PLANNING caMMISSIOp DENYING ';AnIANCt .40. 87 -11 TO REDUCE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED AVERAGE LANDSCA"� SE'UCX AND -D At-LOW A SIX FOOT NIGH BLOCK WALL IN THE RfQUIR£O SETBACK AREA LOCOED AT THE SOUTHEA"q CORNER OF SAH BERNARDINO ROAD AND XLUSNAN AVENOE d THE UTILITY DISTRICT Or THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPEC' y PLAN, AND MAKING FIInINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - 0" )8-162-20, 07, QS, 10, %1, 19, A. Recitals. W Cucamonga County Water District has filed an application for the issuance of thz aii.snce No. 87 -11 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in tid s Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) Oil Janudey 25, 1989, "e Planning Cow2tssion of the (3ty of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the applieat#oc 1d concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Rt_Eo3"Jun have occurred. B. Resolutions. NOS}, THERErCRE, it s hereby found., determined and resolved by the Planning con ission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows, 1. This Connnission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Basea capon substantial evidence oaresented to this Commissioa during the above- referenced public hearing on'Jaruary 25 1SS9, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property locate) at 9641 San Bernardino Road with a street frontage of t214 feet and lot deptbi of 1182 feet and is presently improved with water district fa0litiess and (b) Tho property t.? the north of the subject site is existing single family residential, the property to the south of that site consists of existing single family residentia" the property to '.e east ins a dairy, and the property to the west is the existing Cucamonga County Hater District Headquarters building. Cc) That there is sufficient room on the property to locate the wail at the required setback distance of 35 feet from curb face. Ilv Pt AWNING COMISSION RESOLUTION Rail. VA 87-11 - C"Car.:onga. County Water District January 25, 1989 Page 2 (d) That the wall would not conflict with any existing or Proposed Improvements on site if constructed at the required setback dis.z;nce. 3. Rb4ed upon the substantial evidence presented to this Comgission during the above - referenced public nearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby fi °rds and concludes as f3llows, (a) That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would not result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. (b) That t" erz, are :lot exceptional or extraordinary ci,,cumstances a,. conditions applicable to the property lwr alveQ- to the int nded use of the property that do not apply generally to other prope -'lies in the same district. (o..) chat strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would not deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyeC,by the owners of other properties in the same district. (d) ;hat the granting of the Variance will constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other aropetties classified in the satibe district. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby denies the application. 5. The recratary to this-Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND MPTE® THIS 25TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1989. PLANNING COMMSSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO .JCAMONGA BY: arry e , ME rQn ATTEST: Brad Buller, cre a y PLANNING COb9issrOH RESOLQPION NO. VA 67 -11 - Cucamonga County Water District January 25, 1985 Page 3 I. Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning COMMisstun of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing RRSOlution was duly and regularly introduced, Passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of t W . City of Rancho Cucamonga, at .a regular meeting of the Planning COMission heta on the 2.5th day of January, 2989, by the following vote -to -wit; AYES: COMMISSIONERS; NOES: COwISSIONERS: ABSENT: CaMMISSIdNERS; — CITY OF Rt NICHO CUCM IONGA STAFF REPORT 4 DATE: January 25, 1NIP9 TO: Chairman and flembers of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Miki Bratt, Associate` Planner SUBJECT: AN11EXATION 89 -01 - NOTICE OR PREPARATION OF A DRAFT request by. the y a Rancho Cucamonga s u y e as , billty of annexation and development of approximately 6,000 dwelling units on approximately 5,640 acres of land under mulzipie ownerships in the unincorporated area of San Bernardino County. I. ABSTRACT: The Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Renort sent to Responsible Agencies and Interested Parties on January 9, 1989. As p <<ovided by the California Environmental Quality Act, the comment period for the Notice of Preparation is thirty days. The purpose of this public hearing is to receive public cowent and discuss the scope of the Environmental Impact Report which will be prepared at the end of the public comment period (see attached Notice of Preparation). II. PROJECT ANO SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Project: A Specific Plan is in preparation for development of appr oxi tely 6,000 dwelling units in conformance with the Ceneral Plan designations for the project area. The Tan is Neing prepared I^y the Etiwanda North Consortium. The vonsortium is the area property owners' organization led by Joe Dilorio's Caryn Company. B. Site Description: The land varies from alluvial' formations to hillside slopes s and incluies 11ze Day Creek, Etiwanda Creek and San Sevaine drainage areas. The area is generally bounded on the north by the National Forest, on the south by the City limits, on the east by the City of Fontana, ar:d on the west by the extension of Milliken Avenu:_ ITEM 5 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT RE: ANNEXATION 84 -01 January 25, 1989 Page 2 - III. BACKGROUN(Y: Four projects within the Sphere of influence have recently been anraxed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga totaling 476 acres within the Etiwanda North study area. A majority of owners of the remaining 5,640 acres withir� the study area wish to annex into the City (see Exhibit "A ", Vicinity Map). Existing environmental studies provide the framework for the environmental assessment of the project area. Existing environmental documents include the Master Environmental Impact Report for the Technical Update of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and the Master Environmental Impact Report i,yr the County of San Bernardino West Valley Community Pi an. In addition, Environmental Impact Reports have been prepared for ar within which are o reviewed ca approved byhe Countyf San Bernardino. These documents include V.., Final Environmental Impact Report for the Rancho Etiwanda project, as well as draft EIR's for the University /Crest project and Etiwanda Heights project. For the Etiwanda North project area, studies have bc- - i'Amleted, or are in progress,, on soils, geology, hydrology, air quality, biota, population, open space, fiscal, transportation, cultural resources, health and safety, utilities, public services, and energy. The Environmental Assessment will be used to review elements of the Specific Man which is being prepared for the project area. The elements of the Specific Plan will include, but are not limited to, fine following: o Land Uses o Circulation, Sian o Grading yv7nept Plan o Commnity L'�sign Architectural wcign Guidelines Landscape Concept Plan Community lbeme Walls and Entry Monuments Lighting Standards o Open space Concept Plan Parks Trails Open Space - General I] PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT RE: ANNEXATION 89 -01 Janus M, 1989 Pag( o Community Facilities Concept Plan Fire District Drainage Districts Schools o Utilities Concept Plan o Development Standards o Fiscal Impacts Analysis o Environmental Analysis IV. ANALYSIS: At this time, staff has identified the need for a tonal study on the cumulative effects of traffic impacts, cumulative effects of air quality 'lpacts, police services and effects of aesthetic impacts. Fiscal impacts for the suppression of wild fires in the project area will also need to be addressed. The Envirax.nental Assessment will be used to identify mitigation measure; which will reduce impacts of planned development to a level of non- significance or to identify impact, which cannot be mitt gaffed. V. RECOMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Commission receive test.mo the public and discuss the scope of the Environmental Impact Report. Ad Relys d BB :MB :ko Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vi ci ni ty Map Exhibit "B" - Notice of Preparation E PROJECT AREA I (I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAX,�Gk I PLANNING S- `vOUH ITEM. ANNEXATION 89 - 01 T.qU—. ETIWANaA NORTH ANNEXATION M18M. "A. " SCALE, HONE 1. ETIWATDA tEKkfPS 1 2 EMAfDA kFK,M a Figure °2 3. RANOM PLANKING AREA 4. MILSAFTDc- � VICINITY MAP Y , r c„ S unisisie City Limits & AHMANSON DEVELOPMEENr 9. ETIWAFDA WRiH u ®a.., Un[ncerporets4 Arts Within. City sphtro of Influanco I (I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAX,�Gk I PLANNING S- `vOUH ITEM. ANNEXATION 89 - 01 T.qU—. ETIWANaA NORTH ANNEXATION M18M. "A. " SCALE, HONE CITY QF RAW&6 CUCAM— ONGA Post office Hcx W7. Einar Cucamcnp, CAWOSnia 91—M, C14) 989.1851 NOTICE OF PREPARATIOM OF A 0F.AFT ENVLORONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR ETIWANDA NORTH PROJECT AREA TO: Responsible Agencies FROM: City of Rancho Cucamonga Interested Parties Planning 0ivision 9320 Base Line Road P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 SUBJECT: notice of Preparation of i Draft Envirommntal Impact rt The City of Ran, ho Cucawhga will ►1e thw Laad Agency and k'114 prepare an Environmental Zpact Report for the project identified below. We need to know the views of your agency as to the scope and content of the envirmlmental information which is germane to your agency's statutory responsibilities in cortncction with the proposed project. Your agency will need to use the Exit prepared by our agency when considering your permit or other approval for the project. 111e project description, loco it!ts and the probable environmental effects are contained in the attached aaterials. A copy of the lnitisi Study is attached. Due to the time limits amndated by State law, your response must be sent at the earliest pocsibie date but not later than 30 days after receipt of this notice, Please send your response to Wki Bratt, Associate Planner at the address shun above. We will need the nam for a contact person in your agency. Project Title: Eti*Mda Worth Project Area DATE: Signature ��„�,. _-Iftp►��,�-°... Title Associate Planner Telephone `- -(714) 989 ®1861 Reference: California Administrative 16103, I5375. Code, title i, Sections 15482Ea ?, a {, Z ttaver William J. Alexander &N-la kfarl5(tf Chants J Baguet It City ptgrugrr Dennis L. Stout Dtbivrah N. Brown Pamela J. Wdg:tt Lauren M. Wasserman i NOTICC OF PP,EPARATION OF A DRAFT EWIROMMENiAC IMPACT REPORT FOR EtlMUDA NORTH PROJECT AREA Page: 2 I, PRA' "CT: A request by the City of Rancho Cv-tcamonga to study the eat "s`ib"T7ity of Annexation and Development of app-nximately 6,000 dwelling units on approximately 6 *640 acres of land under multiple ownerships ir: the unincorporated area of San Rernardino County. The project area is called Etiwanda North. A 4WI fic Alan will be prepared for this project area, II. PRWECl' AREA: The project is generally, hounded an the Borth by the Rmonal st, an the south by the CJ9.ar of Rancho Cucamonga, on the east by the City of Fontana, and an the a<esi, by the extension of Mllike4 Avenue (see attached map). III. PREPARATION OF THE DRAFT EIR: The City of Rkncho Cucamonga will be the ea ney contracting for the preparation of a focused Environmente Impact Report on the project. See attached initial Study for pare i nformtativ';;- IV. SCOPING SESSION; 'the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Will con uc"f"a`"public hearing for the purpose of defining the scope of Environmental Impact Report at tAeir regular meeting of January E5, 1589,. If you have any questions, please call WM Britt at (714) 989rMiL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTKUT DIVISION Henderson, AICP t Planner PROJECT AnEA Figure I -2 P ANNING AREA 1111111111 City Limits Ll 11 .a 'Mm, Unincorporated Area Wlthla. City Sphere of lntla%.nce 'NTH CITY OF ITEM: RANCHO CUC -k.N TrrLE. ETIWANDA NORTH ANNEXATION PLANNING S -7 EXHIBIT. "A" SOLE NONE CITY OF RANCHO CUMIfONGA PART It -• INITIAL STLMY ENVIRONMENTAL QHECKLIST DATE: January 6, 3959 APPLICANT: lity of Rancho Cucamonga FILING DATE: --None L0G NUM3tR.___ NnAp PROJECT: Etiwanda North PROJECT LOCATION: Sounded on the north by the National Fgreat nn then „th by the City limixs, an the east by the City of Fontana and on the weSt by theeXtensic I . lyi, Ro I N rAL. SHPACTS of Milliken Avenue, i (Explanation Of -all "Yes"-&U4 "BAybe” answers1are rewired on attached sheets), 3. Soils and Gr.0l.0ay. Will the proposal hove signtilcant resulta in; a, Unstable $round toaditions or In ehangxs in geologic relationships? b. Qisruptions. displacesm4acs, eo"Action or -..Vial of the soil? c- Change in topography or grour�.-j suriacm contour intasvals? d. The destruction, covering or awdificasion Of cap asteitgew geologic or physical features? e. Any potential increase In viud or water erasioat of soils, affecting either on or off sits conditons? f, changes in erosion siltation. or der coition? g. Exposure of people or property., to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, ®ud- slides, ground failure, or sisatlar hazards? h. An increase in the rat* of axtraction mndpor use of any mineral resource? 2, blMloiM. Will the proposal have significant results iii: YES MAYBE NO- ,� X,�_ .� X X Page 2 YE5 MAYBE NO a. - Changes In currents, or the course of directiea of flowing streams, rivers, or ephemeral stream channels? X b. "hanger in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff" c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? I —_ X i d. Change in the amount of surface water in any body of water? s °. Discharge into surface waters, or any alteration of surface water quality? f. Alteration of groundwater characteristic_,? g. Change in the.quantley oY groucidwsters, either through direct additions or with- drawals. or through interference with an aquifer:? ' Quality? Quantity? h. The retluction in the amount of water other- wise available for public water supplies? e I. Exposure of ,eople or p °operty to .water related h4zards such as flooding or se3ches ?' 3. Air Quality, Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile or indirect sources? Stationary sources? .� �r b. Detariorstion of ambient air quality and/or Interference with the atraiament of applicable air quality standards? c. Alteration of locel or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movet:ent, moisture or temperature? .� (r. Biota Flora. Will the proposal h,� -va si ^,nificant results AWL in: a. Qhsnge in the characteristics of species, Including diversity, distribution, or number of any species of plants? b. wzdtlet4nw At Ai.- -S ...... ....:r __. -- Page 3 - YES SAY'? :' NO C. Introd ^_tion of new or disruptive species of plants inuo an area? d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural productiaa? _ v -X. Fauna. Will the proposal'ha'ae significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or numbers of any species of animals? X b. Reduction of the numbers of any unigt:;e, rare or endangered species of animals? �( c. Introduction of now or disruptive species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish cr wildlife habitat? X 5. Poaalation. Will the proposal have significant results in: qu a. WUl the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of the human population of an area? b. Will the proposal affects existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X 6. Socio- Economic Tantorn. Will the proposal have significant results iaa a. Change in local or regional socio- atonic characteristics, including economic or cossarcial diversity, tau rate, and proporty 'dues? X b. V1 project costs be equitably distriuuted assns project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tau payers or project users? X 7. Land Use and Planning- Consideratiors. Will the proposal have significant results in? a. A substantial alteration of the present or planned land us* of an area? b. A conflict with any designations, abjec,;ives,* policies, or aaept(ed plans of any gove,:nmental entities? e, An impact upon the qula9ty or quantity of axis ting conr..=p;Ai or_non- consurotive C - //l Page 4 I I a M 2 . YES MYBE NO 8. TranWrtaiion. Will the proposal have significant results ia3 a. Concretion of substantial additional venicular movement? b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for ` new street construction? _ c. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for now parking? o d. Substantial Lipact upon existing transports- tior, systems? e. Alterations to present patterns of tizeull— Lion or movement of people and /or goods? .� w f. Alterations to or affects on present and potential water = borne, rail, mass transit or air traffic? g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 9. Cultural_ Resources. Will the proposal have significant results ins a. A disturbance to the integrity of archeological:, pclaontolaaical, and/or historical resources? 10. Health. Safety, and Vulsance Platters. Will the proposal have significant results M., a. Creation of any health bazard or potential health hazard? b. l2*Osura of people to potential health hazards? c. A :ash of explovion ox releaae of hazardous se6etances U ,ho event of au accident? d. An increase in tht number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms? �. �.�.. e. Incrasza in existing notsa levels? f. Exposure of people to no¢catially dangerous &*ise 12vels? X, g. Thu creation of objectionable odors? X h. An increcse in light or glare? . X I I a M 2 Page 5 YES 4AYBE Nd _ 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have @iguifieant results in: I a. Tht obstruction or deg- adation of any s.ena,c I I vista or view? X b. The creation of an as ,tically offensive site? .tea x c. A conflict with the objective of designated or potential Scenic corridors? ._ s x 12. Lellities acid Public Services. Will the proposal 1 have a significant need fa systems, or alterations to the following: a. Electric power? X b. Natural or packaged gas? x C. Communications systems? x d. Water supply? ,.o.. X .o.. e. Wastewater facilities? .�... .A.,._ .... f. Flood control structures? X S. Solid vavts facilities? �. g h. Fire protection? X r X. Pollee protaction3 X — j. Schooled? x k. Parka or other recreational facilities? I- Maintenance of publ.c facilities, including roads and fload control facilities? X 0. Other ;ovoraaaintal se.—vices?' x ' 13. -1 riv and Scarce Usouress. 'Till the proposal have oignificant results in: a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or snerey? It b. Substantial increased in demand ,_ %xisting sources of energy? ...._ c. An increase in the dexand for deve:lopcient of new .oure=es Of energy? X d. An increase viz perpetuation of the consumption Of £'ltd- rsnstrW* fortis of eenargy, when feasible Rage 5 YES MAYBE NO e. Subsf°intial depletion of any nonrenewable or weaves natural resource? 14. Mandatory Findings of Sig.,tficance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quaUty of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlif4 species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop belo:,, self sustaining levels. threaten to eliminate a p1Lnt or animal conAunity,;reduce the numter or restrict the range of x rare or andaugered plant or animal or eliminate ).2p;: :tant examples of the major periods of talifornin history or prehistory? x b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short -term, to the disadvantage of long -term, anvirpnmental goals: (A short -tern 1wpnct on the vmvironment is out which occurs in a relativall brief, definitive poxiod of time while long - tern impacts will endure well into the future). c. Doan the project have impacts which are individually limited., but cumulatively considerable? (Cumuiativaiyl consiftrabla means that the incremental effects of an individual pvejeGt &Ke considerable when viewed In connection +,th the affects of Past projects, aed probable f m=4 prr ects). d. Does the project, ozwa envireanwwaatal effects which will cause substaatW *verse effects an human bminge, tither dir:rctly or indirectly? .Y 11. DISCUSSiW OF MiMOMMAL RVALUATIMI (i.e.. of affirmative answers to the above questiom plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures). SEE X ACHED ' ^l3 II. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 1. Soils and-Geilogy. The project site is primarily alluvial formation, but M-5—MM-des ow foothills, as well as minor and major stream courses. An Alquist- Priolo seismic study corridor crosses the project site. There is also an aggregate resource area. Impacts have been identified and discussed in environmental documents for proposed and approved projects in the area (see attached lift). In addition, environmental assessment for the City of Rancho Cur .geonga General elan d`scuss impacts for the general project area. Miti;7tion measures for gEological impacts should be evaluated and proposed. 2. Hydrology. The project area is in the Day Creek, Etiwanda Creek and San va ne. reek Drainage areas. Drainage studies have been completed for these bssins. Based on these studies, impacts are expected to be mitigated to a 'revel of non- significance. 3. Air Quality. Environmental assessments have Been completed for proposed ana approved projects in the project area, ss well as an assessmrent of cumulative air quality impacts which will result from residential development in conformity with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. Mitigation measures for air quality should be evaluated and proposed. 4. Biota. Change of the area from undeveloped to urbanized will result in of ss of area for several native plant cot unities, as well as of wildlife r habitat. Impacts have been f.4antified and discussed in environmental documents for proposed and approved projects in the area. A survey of the remaining project area will be c�Wleted. Mitigation measures should be evaluated and proposed. S. Population. The proposed intensity of development is consistent with the cy o Rancho Cucamonga General plan. Housing stock will be increased. No adverse impacts on population and housing are expected to occur. 6. Socio- Economic Factors. There will be substantial costs for n rao,.euc re and services as a consequence of the change in land use from undeveloped to urban. A financial impact study for the project area has been completed. tidtigation measures should be a +il!uated and proposed. 7. Land Use and Planning Considerations. The project area is located in t►ie unineorporaleeii' area or Mn' Bernardino County and within the City of Rancho Cucamonga Sphere of Influence. Planned Development is generally consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and the West Valley Comaunity Plan. Any impacts on existing recreational opportunities are expected to be mitigated to a level of non- significance. S--/ Y 8. Trans ortation. For the most part, the area is undeveloped with few exi sti ng roads. In general, roads which do exist are sub - standard. A traffic studp for the Etiwanda Drth project area has been completed, as well as traffic studies for proposed and approved projects within the area. Project specific ap,.i,,cumulative mitigation measures should be evaluated and proposed, 9. Cultural Resources. `Surveys of cultural resources ha,/e been completed or proposed and pproved projects within the plq e!t a.,'ea. A sur!ey will be completed for the remaining project area. Any impacts are expected to be mitigated to a level of non - significance. ' 10. Health, Safety, and Nuisance Factors.,; Noise will occur during the construction phases within Ine pro ec area. Also, notice may occur as a result of a, proposed aggregate resource mining oroject within the project area. Noise ,♦lrveys for `the project area have, been completed which addrAss noise'rmpacts. Impacts crp--.e" xpected to be mitigated to a level of non- sionfAlicance for residential construction. ' Adverse impacts associated with, aggregate mining were contained in and evaluated by a previous iEIR approved by the County. Light and glare will o!rcur as a result of change in use from under sloped to urban use. Since, the area provii' a highly visible scenic vista, project specific and cumulative rPit% _,ion measures should be evaluated and proposed. 11. Aesthetics. The project area is situated' entirely on sldgingi alluvial aeposi S nand hillsides which pro,,+ide scc -tic vistas and w{e1:Q:" Project specific and cumulative mitigation measures should be evaluated and proposed. 12. Utilities and Public Services. In general, the infrastructure and services do not exist w n e project area, but will be providad as a condition of development. Impacts for water supply, wastewater facil {ties, flood control structures, soya waste facilities, fire protection, police protection, schools,; parks, maintenance of public facilities, and other governmental seevices should be reviewed and discussed. IE pacts are expected to be mitigated to a level of non, significance. 13. Energy and Scarce Resources. Energy impacts are: expected to be consistent with current s n art'. of energy conservation for residential development, No adverse impacts are anticipated. IC SUM MMY Potentially significant .impacts have been identified in categories I- 12. Based-on existing environmental documontation, most impacts are expected to be mitigated to a level of non- significance, however,, additional review and evaluation of impacts is needed regarding Soils and Geology, Air Quality, 81106, Socio- Edonamic Factors, irahsportation, and Light and Glare and Aesthelics. 8e;ause of the above pot "it�ially significant impacts, Wtause of the size of the proposed projeci area, because of the proposed change from existing use from undeveloped -area to proposed urban use, and because of the environmentally sensitive character of substantial portions of the area, an environmental impact report should'be required. A Rage 7 III. METER)aNATION On the basis.of -this initial eval i wt on. I fi *d the proposed project COULD NOT have a sPificrnt affect on the enviropment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prarpzed. , find that,';iAthough the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a vignifitant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A tiECATIVE DECIr►RATIoci WILL DE pREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a aignific+®nt effect on the X envirnment, and an ENVIRONMENT IMPACT REPORT as required. Pate Sigoatute Associate Plannle Title id DIVERSIFI.^H SHlOPPDIG CENTERS CT'tY OF RAN= C[mmotm 932; ismseline, _road P.A. Box 807 Rancho oxmnmga, CA 91730 Attention: Cindy . o�v�r,��vti 7�vtSlpN IAN 1 b 5989 4 sanw y s, 1989 Re:vttal Ash & Dwelopaaft Rev3etf x-10 gwmn willaga mass IIT Ram , Cmlif=nia Daar Cindy-. Ift resoectfully regtjst that oar application for the retail buildYTyp be withdrawn. The application will be itted at a later date in =Ier to bR heard in ocnjurc:ticn with id's. Should you have any questions ar reqlim - Aditional information, Please do not hesitate to ocntaet me. DVEFOLF-717-D =ppn s C 71 Cloilins Project Manager GC /jh 2910 Red Hill Avitnx, Snit 200, P.O. Bas 5047, Covi Mesa. Celif mia 92828.3047 (714)95746V ITERt '3 0 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 25, 1985 TO: Chairman and Members of z4a Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Chris Westman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 68 -37 - UTMAH- MACDONALD 3 PARTNERS - ih'-ae� opreen o a two-story v, square o0 o , ce building on 7.09 acres of land in the Haven Avenue Overlay District (Subared 6), located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue aind Acacia Street - APH: 209- 401 -01. I. BACKGROUND: On December 14, 1988, the Planning Commission reviewed e si p an and elevations for the proposed office building. Thy. proposed building elevations and the site plan were essentially the same as was previously approved in 1986. The applicants were trying to achieve an architectural style that would be compatible with the existing buildings or the site, However, Planning Commission felt that the exterior walls facing Havew Avenue should be upgraded as a result of their prominent position. It was felt that the proposed building was not consistent with the design goals for the Haven Avenue Overlay District. Further, it was requested that the building walls receive more articulation as well as surface texture changes. II. ANALYSIS: The applicant and staff reviewed plans for the proposed: office bUilding focusing on design solutions which would optimize opportunities to upgrade the facade for compati4ility tL Haven Avenue and existing site constraints. Tire applicant hss revised the building elevations to provide an office building wMch is more consistent with the intent for an "office pare" tyre development associated with the Haven Avenue .�,i ±rlay District, The building will still offer some element; which will tie iry with the other existing buildings on the site. The Design Review Committee (McNeil, Tolstoy, and Coleman) reviewed the propc:ed plans for the office building on January 5 and 19, 1989 and shave recommended that the plans be approved by the Planning Commission. Renderings of the proposal will be posted at the Planning Commission meeting. III. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve =37 through adoption of the attached Resolution. ITEM U PLANNING COWISSION Si' FF R£POR k OR 88 -37 ULMAN- WDONALD A PARTNERS January 26, 1989 Page 2 - espect 7I su ted, Brad Bt Ter City P,�anner BBai -inlg Ataehments: Exhibit "A" Planning Ca mission Staff Report {December LT, 1988} Resolution of .Approval S EN 11 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIMONGA STAFF REPORT .._ DATE: December 14, 1988 ...t TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner sy' Chrls Westman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRC4.wENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CP47 D7K4X-FR,v - The eve opm:.zn a :t two- story-26W66- square toot Mice building on 7.09 ac4"es of land in the Haven Avenue lNerlay District (Subarea 6) located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Acacia Street - APN: 209- 401 -01. I. PROJECT :4ND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of architectural elevations and silre plan. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: north - vacant, il ra tracks; Industrial Park District ( Subarea 6Z, Haven Overlay District South - Office building-, Industrial Park District (Subarea 61, leaven Overlay District East Warehouseldistriiution building; Industrial Park District ( Subarea 6) West - Vacant; Industrial Park District (Subarea 6), Haven- Overlay Oi trict C. General Plan Designations: rroJect site - -Its us r a ark, Haven Avenue Overlay !fistrict North - Industrial Park, Haven Avenue Overlay District South - Industrial Park, Haven Avenue Overlay District East - Industrial Park Nest - Indtstrial Park, Haven Avenue Overlay District D. Site Characteristics: The site is currently developee with two o ice v - enan ndustrial buildings. All on -site and off - site improvements have been completed. A vacant pad exists where the intended office building is to be constructed. U -3 PLANNING COWISSION STAFF REPORT OR 88-37 Utman 7onaid age Partners DecaMcr 14, 198L Page 2 E. Parkin g Calculations: Type Square Parking of Use Footage Rartio Office 26,265 1/250 II. ANALYSIS• Number of Nuc.ber of Spaces spaces Re fired Provided 165 105 A. General: -ibis project was previously approve! in 1986; owl; building pemits expired on the building as well as the Planning COMfssion approval.. Thcrefcre the applicant was required. 'to resubmit for a new approval on the project, Neither, building elevations nor site plan have changed. The proposed use is consistent with the goals of the Haven Avenue Overlay District and with surrounding uses. B. Technical Review Committee: The COMmittee reviewed the project an 40c C11a 1011twing recommendations: 1, ex'Sting overhead utilities: a. The existing overhead utilities i-o msunications for 66 KY electrical) aloe the project's north boundary should be undergroundee fry the first pole on the west side of Haven Avenue to the first pole off -site east of the project's east boundary, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one -half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development ( redevelopment) as it Occurs on the opposite side of the.street. b.. An in -lieu fee' as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (railroad telecowunication Tines) on the project side of the ATASF Railroad should be paid to the city prior ththe messtheTlength fh�m rol the center of Haven Avenue to the east project boundary. The developer tray request a reimbursement agreement to receive one -half this adopted cost for future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the north side Of the AT&SF Railroad. U 1V 1 El RLANNiNG c"issioN STAFF REPORT OR 88 -37 - Utman. lonald and Partners DE.:ember 14, 1986 Page 3 These c3nditions are being recommended at this time because the undergrounding policies hi-a changed since the original - aapruval of this project anal were not included in the original approval. C. Design Review Committee: 'the Committee (Emerick, McNiel, ColemanY rev ewe the project on November 17, 1988 and recommended ,,^Droval to the Planning Commission. Although the Committee felt that the painted concrete tilt -up material proposed for the building was not consistent with the desired style ror haven Avenue, it %tas agreed that the materials were eap stpriateiln order to maintain a consistency with the three 0. Environmental Assessment: A Negative Declaration was issued or the project--u-nder—ifs original approval on May 14 1986. Therefore, additional action is not required. I11. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The proposed use is cinsisterit with the General Man and maven Avenue Overlay ,District The building design and site plan toeether with the recommended conditicsas of approval are in compliance with the 1.4ien Avenue Wer'-ay District. • fine project will not be detvi ta? to the health, safety, lfare, or imaterially injurious to surrounding properties. I�% nuC s�1Ek A110N: Staff recommends that,. the Planning Commission approve move] 01*1ent Review BF -"a. Brad f City F Be :CW.* Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location MAp Exhibit "S" - Site plan Exhibit "C" - Elevations Reso'ution of Approval with Conditions MJ CIRCULATION 120' RAW. 106' R.O.W. BB' or less A.O.W. RAIL SERVICE Existing Proposed TRACLS /ROUTES 0 0 0 0 Pedastrian 0000 Bicycle �a Regional Multi -Use Special Streetscape/ Landscaping Power Line/ UtOity Easement •�••• ••• CrOO'Q, & Channels Bridge Access Points 'Park Fire �U, 1� =ti1U17 (O 'fro 0� 400" 800 1609 CITY OF rr.�vt. ., °7 _ PLANNING kNV Dl ijl.71QN EXHIBM. JC..d'Ya. Z m x MIMIN INN PM I J r-^ 40, (" 1 i 4� 12"' I� j vI i �,� $: F � Sa ) �'; i �' .._. sty. -,� � •,�. exwo rAxrorr '�— "� ACACIA _.!w Em " V} I NORTH tt i L q 0 1 L.oCAiv1Vi°<xA ITL� �' ^; PL A ItC %r�nMN YE-IIBt- a S CE RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING �- ANISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 25 -37, FOR A 26,265 SQUARE FOOT "TWO -STORY OFFICE BUILDING LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN HAVEN AND ACACIA STREET IN THE HAVEN . "VENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-401- 01. A. Recitals,_ M Utman- McDonald and Partners has filed an application for the approval of Uevelopment Review No. 88 -37 as described in *.e title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the sub, ct Development Review reTiest is referred to as "the application". (ii) On the 25th of January, 1989, the Planning Commission of She City of Rancho Cucamonga cciaducteu a iw,:.ting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution. have o=. .ed. q. Resolution. NOW, 'niEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. this Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting or. January 25, 1989, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the i.ortheast corner of Haven Avenue and Acacia Street and is presently improved with three (3) multi- tenant industrial buildings: and (b) The property to the north of the subvect, site is the AT&SF Railro.d, the property to the south of that site consists of office /industrial buildings, the property to the east is industrial uses, and the property to the west is predominantly vacant. approvals. (c) The current proposal is consistent with previous 3. Eased upon the f.mbstantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph i and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows; k -7 PLANNING COMWSSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 88 -37 - 'Utman- McDonald & Partners January 25, 15199 Pale 2 (a) That the proposed project is consisG)nt with the objectives of the General Plan; and (b) That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in wfiich the site is located; and (c) That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable Provisions of the Development Code; and (d) That the, rroposed use, together with the conditions applicable therttto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to propert•I.)s or improvements in the vicinity. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the Calirornia Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this ;ommission issued a Negative Declaration on May 14, 1986. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and ':every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division 1. design op shall be mounted rchiteeccturallyshaint grated screened thud the elev,,tions. Detail plans shall be submitted for City planner revvew aad approval prior to issuance of building permits. 2. A combined ;rinument /project Identification sign shall be provided at the northeast corner of haven Avenue and Acacia Street. The design of such sign shall be consistent with the southerly approved project (DR 84 -51) and the Haven Avenue Overlay District requirements. Sign permit application shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building pernits. E Ez 3. Special landscaping treatment shall be provided along Acacia 1 Street and within the parking area adjacent to Acacia Street to mitigate the loss of tree planting within the Metropolitan Water D;strict Basemen , Therefore, extensive tree planting shall be provided between the easement and Buildings "A'" and "D ". 1he easement itself shall be planted with shallow rooted trees, -o PANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. G,_ 38 -37 - Utman- McDonald & Partners January 25, 1985 Page 3 11 1. Notice of Intention to .join the proposed !*di an island Landscape Maintenance District shall be filed with the City Council prior to issuance of buildiq permits. 2. Existing ovarhead utilities: a. 8th Street (vacated) - The existing overhead utilities (communications for 66 KV electrical) along the project's 1�--a shrubs, and groundcover. A continuous hedgerow shall be planted to screen the parking areas from Haven Avenue and Acacia Street. Berming shall be provided along (raven Avenue aqd Acacia Street with an average height of throe fret and a maximum slope not to exceed 3� feet within the Petrgpolitan Water District easem -Int. Approval from the Metropolitan kilter District of the detail landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to City's approval of the landscape and irrigation ptnp and prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Pedestrian - oriented facilities such as shaded seating areas with attractive landscaping, fountains, kiosk, benches, trash receptacles and other street furniture shall be provided within the centralized plaza area. Detail plans shall be included in the 'landscape and irrigation plans and shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. S. Full material samples of the texturized material within the plaza area shall ba submitted for Planning Division review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 6. Greater roof height variation for Building "B" shall be provided. Revised plans shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to submitting for plan check. 7. The southeast corner of Building "C" and the northeast corner of Building 'D" shall be cut off to flair out the landscaping as shown in Exhibit "Cu. Revised elevations submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to submitting for plan check. 8. Two parking spaces adjacent to the landscape setback locatea at the most easterly project entrance shall be eliminated for providing stacking distance as shown in Exhibit "C ". 9. Large landscape planters and pedestrian walkways shall be provided within the raw of parking spaces at the curve of the driveway across from the southern tip of Building "B" as shown in Exhibit "C ". Engineering Division 1. Notice of Intention to .join the proposed !*di an island Landscape Maintenance District shall be filed with the City Council prior to issuance of buildiq permits. 2. Existing ovarhead utilities: a. 8th Street (vacated) - The existing overhead utilities (communications for 66 KV electrical) along the project's 1�--a PLANNIVS COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. OR 80 -37 - Utman- McDonald & Partners January 25, 1989 Page 4 north boundary shall be undergrounded from the first pole on the west side of Haven Avenue to the first pole off - site east of the project's east boundary, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. ThR developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one -half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as .t occurs on t`nz opposite side of the street. b. Railroad Right -of -Way - An in -lieu fee as ::ontribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (!railroad telecommunication tines) on the project side of the AT &SF Railroad shalt be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be the full adopted unit amount times the length from the center of Haven Avenue to the east project boundary. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one -half the City adopted co-3t for future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the north tide of the AT &SF Railroad. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED ANO ADOPTED THIS 25Tei DAY OF JAWMARY, 1959. PLA "ANING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY, rry T. McNiel, a rman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Wretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting o! he Planning Commission held on the 25th day of January, 1989, by the following vote- to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: tt-j2- I d O W . ;j 1 - g i OY,Q =�pO LAN yO'r 'N ►6� Oi�11�Fyy i�� y�{�ji OI` « E��L6 (rj C Y tz Y�•aa� cc�� Y `a YuY � VA ►4i O OO. sY� ^v'. I aOSs yyyLy Y c°t h% u p v IT ^^ 3 ►� Cae�tl'd .- L O �^ y� g. �• i �qO Y ij 1^r St 4 N} Y�. ► IR x ro C N M• Y ^^ Nw` »« y Y > »w. v� N a s $i2 r Pa a u C« Y w z N u Z �' ►Sis �aVZT, m ca IJ- u ^a J w N f•1 .P Yf M-43 In r I.v 0 O ^o ilk 5i H �Y�`� ■ ■•yii0 ^4JL J i6 tl CY Y j & Y�� y �Y yY,Y r � Y ai Tqp �e zi S �q� ^�oMy��Y�OVC tuuy Z ^y O��u � ►$S: YY W +LqV . Y M � •y" \ Y ^�rK� a II.�C.e >,� ► Q Y +As Y�°' p. Uj ►C N Y §a ^�Eyfi�C�a �V�O. �a4..$�yYia�t _qw iTS � N Y9 NyFOY �I d O W . ;j 1 - g i OY,Q =�pO LAN yO'r 'N ►6� Oi�11�Fyy i�� y�{�ji OI` « E��L6 (rj C Y tz Y�•aa� cc�� Y `a YuY � VA ►4i O OO. sY� ^v'. I aOSs yyyLy Y c°t h% u p v IT ^^ 3 ►� Cae�tl'd .- L O �^ y� g. �• i �qO Y ij 1^r St 4 N} Y�. ► IR x ro C N M• Y ^^ Nw` »« y Y > »w. v� N a s $i2 r Pa a u C« Y w z N u Z �' ►Sis �aVZT, m ca IJ- u ^a J w N f•1 .P Yf M-43 In r I.v 0 O ^o ilk 5i H c� w Original poor Quality cs'i 4 g'YP� *.z oy .Y's�'L 2+ga 8-" $a y; H Ali ccp C4 Jim. YY�V t:� L�w YgYy Ys y V.+ Ny U CO wl HIS � �!L ; l�.t�SN•`�L �4� 2 ,2 � N 13".2 �y w. /� �q Q► M y x�1 µ 3 6 py� yE cc 'jN'jjj'. y* e y� �b»~.; o� Oy NN aaas �"■NNCaQip. {sgays �G P■ Q .P. L . M6 pY 8 qa $ fir. O YL PY.��95WCY CP 9 gdt. _HOC• O ,M C- 9w 2 4 V� q N�rgM N ^�M� VaL� `Y�P rw OY � iy LO � Y1 gYV �� yy��w �� .i L�� y`� ��y■+r �T�yr y�Y� u,�� u�� Y R't R Lyp �'� yB Jy�Cy+�My L� V dam■ {rY. YV Y4 yN N`!aN i. i MY M -lei RA =3 u C 4OY 11.. $yR Ji GYYM �^ Y �K �Y �y ■Ny1 y/Y;� N Y. tY "Lt ty�{��jY .1p q- V is- . Ar pN�n «� lk v� ;� Sri„ �� I~ a �.'"'.y O^ e+,L ra�P+Mf ks �I t �+ �. ■ Yt� is a '� �~y'tra �L H11 US r it- skis Z. Sbas M IW! � s1 i4 a�.�i. iSj S m i i yy P ° psY f Y p s M yP NYC 'fii N° N » »yyw {yap yp a °� upt _U B Z r Y fiM � �� ey L i n. 11so� a CV 0 6; OCOO CO 1] N €€ �� OyTypp eOO O ywN )q rS wq�.�� cp C L `yL. LN�C YN Y ^w OS T4.��r��4y�YLp C1��C O fao�O fTi ^o Gi ya O VQ 09 ww��`-0 LS . gCYI LL.•''�Or�R tly ,aY �ii iP 6 a��N�O I1�S YtlL g�NR��i;S CCC «WY ^� f ltJ 7S lY NY y YY GY OI �L k. .+yin g Arltl` MNY�p{ i ®LQeC SM �N Cp a b`N LLB �Nf11 q^ yN07S.O N�+Y �.�Y_OV is tl1Yif. yi1pN.a-� 1 < jf' a °�' I I N Y N 11. 4 y 9 �} 423 . I-- Y N yy y N ems* MN.Oc�` « y. 7�° .!g?'iLLyi�rmya �u" fVtV 6y NYj -PF Is ` R G p(L'Y ~ O+ q NN5'L^ C ` ya- ja 11yypNW V ^ +7a.02. NyyL YfN 'Y^OSY OOONi..^�.. �a•• N YL wqq+ OyyY i.3 pC 1pC. YCde. 2 y1 N x r L < W W p N M �08 gRQ Gy� V ddb Ali NG yyyY^`+ Y MyS� r S PNq w C1 iql lH 2.yy� [i ,S L$O aV^ yQ,GV Y WLa ^^ OYY� yg LI�yMe "IT 4.3 TitSbtl� y�C�66N V r� Y y M a'S �� S +tlbMI 4f „NY os M 6 pYp pN � �QpM •Q L t6eZ �YY'Y cr Y'�o LC� r ^rJ i�^S °Lw.g,�NN ygY Ygor y' +iSf c O vf.�a Vw� i V Y e. T y �� J. VO f. Y � NN S^ Sy.g- x *� - a- a ^g� Nei„ =x.L Y 1� I 0 i Original Poor Quality run o� Ey _ Lo ■tq.0 " op .,�.^arcY`Ai y^\Q.wy O ^{C�� Vf„'6 J �p •q u.,e �.01� Q `i Y YN ` 4 -all UA $$4 3CVZ a ��$ F;4: !� ro Y 4Z; V t , a Jm qF Y gox °sus :Est ae �dq M d 3 IL r �.. �ioQ i5 yq .e Y ; _ A ill �,� Vr�g i`e ry 1y3 +E yid %. .L' O6 Qg„ CCpp ppQ 1� eg 'CwY4_.` is OF .gyp Ewa L.Tit Yn ='C' C(3� ■1 cH! all M 4 � �u • Y e 1i N 3 � L' eye 4� � N N q �e O +T V �.� fy��AY. a� 1N �qq«.�� S i�+ !Y io. �jp� A pYcO $.0-i tt yN�. q30 '3i �Yr � �ii C e « a r. ■ff q w r�k it_8��Z Z, �� « t 1%, U s Iry !HIt a4y�s Y.r ��nS �N.,,p , Y�'� � 1► ay SCIS 14.Y ' � � „ ' Original Poor Cp� Quality a N o2 T M Y L Ol MCC y Yb �M N Vj�i W VyW O j L YpYL� M =� Gg.ON �v pdir. �. ysT V r C.'Cl +JMA yy V,C V tCYi1 : N rT 1 ®! O 2 N � Me cO V OrY 4. � O VN C C iyy1 LU V O 5 Y ��/ Sj. �Y�a rte+ 1.2 ..d vO i Sr� a Y cFZO O. o� CC M C �� Y c 6 Y w ~ O V N S i ^q y ► C Y O S r a p V Wb N h M 4 J `1 11i w R a1 O G ''JI p COI �p V y y > yv �p22l 1 V�Nj • V V v` U274 aV �ap q `p 110 Oy L uw�N L tR N Py tlnpn y+ Ev SLV 4 V _py peL YM.L +V� yO�+ L~ i '.N!!Jw CS J rA n iwdC N �i iCUV VO �y. � � Y��yrr Q W ~ ai. Q O v \\ 1 M Y N K r 8 Y G 0• O 'OE V N 2 gongg 1H a$wa= TL ; s all] , Y ." � 341 'i IL w� �{�3��~° °tl�q S� »C 1rA «�■ �4 4R ;� a�R R40Y�y ' YYY �r • �4, ��Mp4.tt zt r Y �M `'. N� �A 11 ;;, .sj bb as `-i ggig wq •s w.�s ai N°� `ta «.o YOB la so NI& C 24 +tl a_, Y. cM Y aM� �w Y «M Y* " 2--St ■ Y� • yii�iy s VO w cyNm'O C OC M6.PH w' M�ygY 4Z. 8 Mai +.,ip!A i i 1 it SZisF MY ��a�. •��ey$.a ,�yY�'C( w �u��:7Sw ��wR ��.".isr 3 t^l L, cC Sa' w i a O'Aginal Poor Quality pp.. Oay�M N Y r O N�eLt S",."'J w�•+y."• : ct z CY�J ai` y� i =ate• yL� °t4 3 C_ =r``�s = 5� - X C[.lVa I.i"C tiN s4`O- 4w _y ON^ SAN 3 i 3= xo a 4 .w`` r^�i�3�13 •3iY S a E a '� L�` C° e� VpE 01 � ve y- tos"iO3 �E a =r_ g" El ea aw1 'jya 'is j x q- wg= r "y"+[;r ' "�e � w w y� V g 7 -%9 pa0 yiq V �x Mc ` A1 �Nt,O ,Ny10r Y �y C ■y M 'J Y y of +0 2%U {4 iI L W Q R.- 1 ii. V ! e � wr ` kin N W +� tYYY Z v" \! N T E 11 original Poor u r 3w �Yi� Ya .w V N.: n Q Y u � M n � p V w y u ao p�v a ciw � p Y � QYQ Q �tv AziV r b 1 � j� �Y � \ � � C � 1 i a Y ) N i fr pp i La t� ` +A!0�yQ + �yii11 pp w c e a _ �u Sys 6 W7N pd. H. F 3 pg A� •1FOa �� ~1 � 4N•q� � � �i �4� Q�...,r 'a w ti 44 0 'rgr I Yy S ��, «"�a w k A +�i6 p �,.. 9� Y.ipYi!r�� Y. MYGY� .�1 py �Y� Jr afY1 gN i +3 VY�f N °nQ., Kw �+�NM Sr K'W O� K7 •rM'..�..:4 V9 w Q . YS7 ills 4 . olr, A a 1 M � V t n t U E E CITY OF RANCHO CUCA%ONGL cc�c �.1►rot, STAFF REPORT C � r O O DATE: January 25, 1989 1977 TO: Chairman and Wmbers of the Planning Commission FR01% Brad Buller, City Pla ;mQr BY Scott Murphy, Associate Planner 1 SUBJECT; UN:rORM SIGN PR%R;,M FOR THOMAS WINERY PLAZA OAS 'IiiVE�t'a?r I„ BACKGROUND: On January 27, 19J8, the Planning Coninissiun approved Tffe— dFv`eoprhent of a srJpling center incorporating the existing Thc+mas Vinery bufl�ing located at the northeast corner of rbothill Boulr,ard and vineyard Avenue_ As a condition of approval, the Un='rorm Sign Program was to be submitted for review and approval by the City. The applicant has submitted a sign progt'l for the center and `as been working with staff over the past several months. In keeping with the Planning Commission's recent direction, staff is forwanding the sign program to the Planning Comfliss'cn for review and.Oproval. II. SUR -iAWi GF PROGRAM: Attached for ;our review and approval is the sign n program su ted by the applicant. The major components of the sign program are as follows: A. Monument Si_ g�n_s • Three project identification monizaen is are proposed for the project and wirl oe located at the major driveways off of Foothill Boulevard, Vineyard Avenue-, and San Bernardino Road (See Location Plan 1). The !V s`uare foot monuments will contain +.we tenant identifications and the logo for the Thomas Winery project. B. Still fuilding Identification: The applicant is proposing to e a seven cot der project logo on each side of the still building (See Location Plan 3 and Exhibits 3 and 4). C. Major Tenants: The applicant has proposed to des ?gnate u,V, G. and K as major tenants for the project (See Location Plan 8). Signs proposed for the major tenants will ne internally illuminated channel letters with it minim6w Tetter h!i?aht o,' 12 inches and & maximum letter hcight of 24 inchea ..�c4 Exhibit 1,2 -141. A, variety cf polo--., for the sign faces are available as outlined nn page G ,f the s;gn critRhia. Item V PLANNIYG COMMI;MON STAFF REPORT UNTFORM SIGN PROGRAM - THOMAS WINERY P'•AIA January 26, 1989 page 2 D. Minor Tenants., All other tenants not specifically i'dentifiee as ma or eKdnts will be considered minor tenants and wi'l utilize individual channel letters with a whits sign "ace (See Location, Plans 9 -10). The minimum letter height shat: ba 12 inches and the - aximum letter height shall be IS inches (See Exhibits IS -16) . M. STAFF ANALYSIS: In reviewing the sign program proposed by the app Tcan�,---s5t"f suggests that the Planning Cortm +ssion discuss the following areas for possible modification: A. Ptomment Sinn: The Develoom nt Code per<imits one monument sign per s nee rontage with a maximum of f'Av sig:is permitted per development. In that "the applicant is aropes)ng three monrment signs, the monu`nent sign along Svi Bernardino Road will be eliminated. In order to maintain the appearance of A functior;al driviaway, as opposed to a, service alley appearance, however, the project logo would be incorporated into the rock wall at the driveway entrance along San Bernardino Road. B. St`,l1Bui_lding• In revie4ing the i foot diameter sign pr -ed for all four s'i des of tine still building, 1 di ng, staff request at a smaller ize of 5 feet be analysed by the appli r See Exhibit ' and "aA of sign ccitnrial. Staff is of t' ..ion that.tha 1 foot L arrater sign is appropriate in this Instance due to the proportion to the space and the lining up with tie ss has of the dormer (See Exhibit 3)- In staff's opinion, the saga will Pot appear to be too large bn.Lause of its location on the upper portien of tLe building. However, it should be oote,0 that on the west and east elaxq ions there is in:;ufficient area { abovo the windows which will require l- rering the logo sign If botween the windows. Therefore, the-,. could be an ,unbalanced appearrin a because at least two of the sti l : building will be visib'ae to motor sts on ViTmsard or Foothill. Originally, the avoid "WiNERY1 was painted in white letters against a black background #-: %he west elevation. This sign style was typical of U(Z types of signs used on ;petal agricrsltural builW ngs. In terms of `.: design of the sign, staff feels that therd are several oo:'.ans available: 1) Limit Nita north and south elevations where t`. in 'Nil surface area. All �k 2) Restore the paint, letters that are located on the oast elevation. 11 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT UNU -;iRM SIGN PMAM- THOMAS WIRIERY CLAZA 0anuary 25 1989 Page 3 3) Paint "THOMAS !91NERY PLAZA` letters. 4) Delete shot logo from the still' building in favor of the three %go signs on the street monuments. Regardless of the type of sign that is proposed for the 4til'( building, approval must te - zbtained frata boOY the historic Preservation Cvmnission and �.hc Planning Commission. Decai;e of this, stafi wou;u recommasd that this part.cular sign issue should be deferred until; , iie Historic Preservation Commission reviEw3 this item at their;March 2, 1989 meeting. C. La Teaan *s; 1. Variation in color. As prfaosed by the applicant, aialKie Unants would ctirrently have a choice of six colors for their sign (red, oran9e, yellow, green, blue, and white) plus any typestyle. Based upon p ^evious sign programs, staff fells Cyat the choice of = ;olors should be limited to no more than three for the tajor tenants. This wovld not preclude major tenants from usIA- other colors it their registered logos. 2. & 4n Kr The applicant is rerrently proposing two 'sign' '6e located )n Building K tth� existing winery buildinx), one on the west elevation facing Vineyard Avenue and one on the south elevation towards Foothill Boal.tvard (See Exhibit 14), Recently, the P1annFng Commission con idered a modification to delete Building J to provide additional parking to allow an 8,5000 square foot restaurant user tc go into the existing . winery building. At th2t timlz, ,4 was indicated the winery building could poUntially he used by two different ausinesc;es. Ther0ore, if the winery building is used by one business, staff feels that the 24 inch letters for both signs are appropriate. If, however, two businesses 1�ca to in the wi ne -a bssi l di ng, staff feels that the sign facing Vineyard Avenue could be maintained wM the 24 inch letter^ size due to the najority of the building being occupied by the restaurant user. The sign facing Foothill Brulevard should then be reduced to 18 iPwhes in height due to the minor square footage of Oe existing winery being occupied by the second business, PLANNING CWAISSION STAFF REPORT UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM- THOMAS WINERY PLAZA Januar; 25, 1989 Page 4 As with the still building, any signs for the winery building must also be reviewed and approved by the Historic Preservation Cm=ission. Staff therefore recommends postponement of a decision on this sign until after „he March 2, 1989 Historic Preservation meeting. 3. Souppiartation Logo, To identify the Souplantation restaurant u ng A) , t' . applicant is proposing 24 inch individual channel letters using a white sign face and the corporate logo using green, red, and grey sign face colors. Staff has concern with the slam of the logo that is proposed for the west elevucion (See Exhibit 11). In this location, the applicant is proposing a logo that is four and one - half feet high by nine and one -half feet leng. Staff feels that the size of the logo should be reduced to a similar size that is proposed for the Foothill Boulevard (south) elevation, In this location, the logo is approximately two feet by four and one -half feet in size. By reducing the size of the logo nn t)R. west elevation, �Oe sign could then be 1 ai d out in a soil ar ,fanner as th* sign facing Foothill Boulevard, if desi•ed. :mother lssae is the nuvaber of signs for SouplantQt. oft.. The City's Sign Ordinance allows for a co%birttion of wall and monument signs, not to exceed a total of three suce signs per 'business. This is reinforced by the lhs ventence in paragraph 1.a on page 3 of the sign progr,a, t=tnce two wall signs are ;proposed on the SouplLn.ation building, they would only b permitted to use their name on a monument siin once. The Souplantation name was used to 41lustrate the monument graphics which may be misleading as to the allowable nu;aber of signs. Logizally, the Souplantation nacre would be identified an the Vineyard Avenue monument only because their wall signs are 4lose to Foothill. IV. RECOMMENDATTON: Staff recommends t;:3t the Planning Commission cons r aafl -"nput on -the proposed Uniform Sign Program. After receiving all input, staff recommends that the Planning Commission provide direction to the applicant and staff for any necessary, revisions to the sign programs. The direction should be provided through minute action. El PLANNING C"ISSION SrAFF REPORT UNXFORM SIGN, PROGRAX -o�HOMAS WINERY PLAZA January 25, 1989 Page 5 ,` Res c 1y tte Bra er city P. annex BB -SM:js Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Prop�wed Uniform Sign Program 1 ,r 1 1 �J i 1 i I ao d ,.. _. � c E City of Rancho Cucamonga, California August 25, 1986 Tenant Sign Criteria r1w. _ criteria have been established for the pruposr► Of assuring an outstanding shopping center for the rnmal benefit of all tenants. Conformance will be strictly trnforceri aad any instsilW, non- <:onforMing, or unapproved signs will not be allow -eed. S. GEMAL RHQUIREWMS P ,t 1. Tenant shall submit, or cause .o to sui IOAtt d, try the I.aadl elowr approval, before fabrication, three copies of deetai 4 drams indicating the lmtic+tt3, sign, layout, design and color of any propoeetil sign, including an lettering and/or graphics. 2. Signs shall bo in ak='dan'ce with State i0d LOW sign ooh regulations and °.11 per vi z for signs and their installation shall be obtained b!r the Tenant ar its raw. * Wntative. A407 efl4wAvIb CA14dAA%4. 3. Landlord *hall administer and inierp:at this criteria. 4. All signs shall be oonstructed and installed at'ceaanVs ®xpense. 5. Zion- amforrr,ing sips will be removed at the e�xaaae of the to naafi. 6. Landlard Z-hah TOWVO th@ right to amanfl this alit as txecessM7 approvalft from t o'city. 1. So signs of any kind shall be insta"led or su ded ft'om MY area tit approved by the . ndlord.,*Vo r,.Ile e , ' ep AvOO Vii' ' -01"- 2. No painted leUering will be Mmitt . 3. No animated, flashing or audible signs will be permitted. 4. No posters, banners, or other signs without the approval of the Landlord,OW jJ/—*�- t lly GEC I" AClb eeAAZW,4 . 5. No window va" i of %OX of Hrindow area. C. SIGN LOCATIONS 1. The location of any sign must conform tas approved site locaUft plan, a part of this criteria, and mutt be approved by the LandlordA(a> CW -?Pr je ea 7,4. l). CONSnUCT1ION lRRQi inh(LINTS 1. No oar,, :used raceways will be allowed. 2. All x aceways, transformers, of other wiring shall be located behind the buik ling facia. �. All fasteners, clips or other hardw re, whether exposed non- expowd, Stull bed of non - corrosive sate AL 4. No labels will b* permitted on end suaiacrs of the sign ea #pt those requirod by Imal and state ordinancx, and those shall 'be in an inconspicuous location. 5. Mecb*d -. rvke to all eigns 311011 be 9eparatoly Metered t* the metw of the tenant, and not be D'art of common arRa operation costs. E. INSTALLATION REQUIR TS 1. Installation of any sign shmlt be promptly and Wet)-, installed with as tittle disruption to bclften and traffic as possible and with a w1rumurn of inconvenience to the Landlord and to the other "Anaslts. i 2. Upon removing any sign the Tenant shall, at his own expense, repair any damage created by -tich removal and shall place the area from which the aign was moved back to its original condition. 3. Tenant shell be responsible for the maintenance of his ,4wrn sign as required for normal t)peraU*n. Suclr maintenance Should; include, but not be limited to broken, faded, chippe3 and peeliag signs, and burned out or inconsistent Illumination. F. XNSITRANCE REQ9IRE34IMS 1. Sip cony: actor shall carry p°,topertq damage and publie liability i•umrasce which shall protect him, Tenant and Landlord against danis go caused by 'or connected with 'the installation, use or structural sufficiengr of the sign. Cy. PROJE CT-S SPECIFIC "QUI S 1. Gtn sral: a. Pro r Mt flcation Moments a 'Identification Monuments signs will be allowed for the project, Eaaj monument will include the project lop and logotype and tU* identification of two primacy tenants. Ee= tonant is lie Attd to a matmum of three signs idenMtying its business smi this mon =ent identification is considered one of these signs. SO Mbib 1 and 2 for details, and Location Plans I and 2 for locations. MKIC-71AV Me 41n; One Project logo, 7 feet in diameW (34.5 square toot) loated on each of four sides of stiti building. See Fxhibits 3 and 4 for detral3, and Locate~ plans 3. 3 C. A directory will be installed at the Primary project entrance (off F*othnll Boulevcyd) as required by the city's fiat department for easy a _, ntificat.�on of buiijng locations. Bui'.ditags are to bo identified on thcs locator map with a minimums 1 inch ac'uress number. See Mibit 5 for details, aad Location Flans 4. Location plan identities location of proposed future tenant directory with u,.toricel information snap (P ing design approval at iaW dab&), d. ,vice► = III'muficatioa epee F.ahibit b for d`et -ass, and T ,nation Plins 5. individual nurnexals, a inches in height, located on pact rock wail at project enUios, facing street and dire cAly below Project identification: Monument i. §=dja gee See Exhibits 7 for details. g. Sqtt2 �4d4. 4mW Sin Mbits 8 for details. ii. g bans. Stop Signs Handicap and Privat , Fropetty Regulations S EWbits $ and 10 for details, and Locaflon FICA* 6. Y 4 2. Yena nt Crito :iaa - ,All TIna nt signing consists of individud, intsrs*<ally illuminat. litters. a. Quantity: A rrta�irrnum of tht`" s will be allowed for X.,j busirass. fi'wese signs incx+ade one per boding olevatio n and ideaatificatfol. on one of the Project Identification P anuan Into. b. Tppe<styia: Tenant's Option, an 49pital of capital and :ow+er ca fee, with the approval of me f.andiord and cttr of Rancho Cucannoaga. c. Lego: Tenant vption with the approval of te. * Landlord. InWnally illuminated and City of Rltlth* CucaMMa1a. d. Material: primary scpy to bar fabricxatett tuetal channel ietL*r watt translucent a"pir, face. er Lcca Win: Centered on Tennant store front a& indicated on 201bit dmwiings (emhibits12 through 16). f. Colors: TMro tr pes of tenant spatces east iv tllr- prOOK � trfajor tenants (1§ldp. A, D, G, and X.), and Wier tonants. M#',*r tenants may utilize a variety of coon for their signs facer (see appravea color p0ate below). An other Unitas win uae wWW faces. Tt return color of an signs wilt be mo same tihroAh out Ve projoct (Dunn Edwards Q 11 -49D green). 1. ajar Tenants (514gs. A, D 4, a 1 R) i Face: Transluceamt Acaryft Rhom & Reas W -2415 aranp -2119 1-/m r, Ulow -2465 13 &yes Green -2108 t1u,: 2648 � Yd�tt�e -23t�D eturn and Trimcap: Color to ma%n Dunn Rdwafd$ 11 -49D Vrt� 2. All Other Tenants Face: Translucent Acrylic Rhom & klaas White -2380 Rebirn and Trimcap: Color to match D=n Edwards Q 11 -49D �. size: L Major Tenants Bldg. A West Elevation 60 Sq. Ft. (Mammy area: 60 sq. it.) 2 4" n1eximum ketw. height 12' Minimum letter height 5 ineb return S�Mth Elevation 32 Sq. F't. (Maximum area: 32 sc(. IU 7 /g"4V02W 2 4- maximum letter height / ! ?' Minimum letter height 5 inch return Bldg. D 60 Sq. Ft. (Maximum mw 60 sq. IU 2 i° maximum letter height 12' Minimum letter heit 5 inch return Ndg. G 60 Sq. Ft. Oaldmum area: 60 sq. IQ 24° maximum I*Utr height 12' Minimum letter height 5 inch return Bldg. B 60 Sq. Ft (Mattaum area: 60 A. it) 2 4' rnammum letter height 12' Minimum letter height 5 imb return �i k f _ 2. Ali Other 3 enli i is All other tenants art separatod into two (atagories relativo to sign sizes. Thew sign siz6 16 sq. tt and 24 sq. ft., are predicated an availtbir Ac-ft area g (,la ve to sb me ffbnt ?ges: Refer to Exhibits for the Y, *ntification and sp»cific lxution of it We" signs. 16 Sq. ft, Maximum area: 16 aq ' Q 18- mr z -,�Uum letwt height 12' Minimum letter height 3 inch return 2,4 Sq. ft. %um area: 24 sq. ft.) 18- masimma letter height 12' MiWmum, tetter height j inch return Tenants shah to responsible for ides fulffUmont of - -Xxlhe re"femerits and sped bons contained in those documents. litibit /10701-02 o1-- 5 -89 PC Agenda o 0 -5 l EWbit 2 pp i 0 n at UIL, =t 7 Location Plan 1 Jill Jill PIP at UIL, =t 7 Location Plan 1 Jill Jill Irl 1 \�� »�\ . \� � \ \ <w : zm� � : �� /� 7 ��\ � � \ �,� e� � � \ is e NS F � t.: I- I , k a. F � t.: I- I , k to 11"0 , I , - �I lug.. E] (11 i Elftibft 14 f� ii v a P, 7i L o!l zj I AA iii N I L(,r2U!*n Plan 3 Vr,,l [A- Em Ulf:�:qzz. 7i L o!l zj I AA iii N I L(,r2U!*n Plan 3 Vr,,l [A- Em 10 CT Tp A4. EXhibit — ---------- It 4h Yee' V-,2 Loattion Plan 4 V I m _v �M I i N }a i Esutbit 6 t Q f a V hi �' i�', p If If b LocaUoft Plan rtt �i v 11 61 ON \ \\ -§ izt le,--M I'll.' 1111111 AM tq Bshibit s V,)k n 11 P V Ilk e A` N i s libibit ion 1I •a ®n K. i �.i ms �.. C y M wy /�� ci 0 , N= W %. �i mC "�'�t»tlEr�.a� � "JD. a '00 CX a: a �.. 6i .0 315 �i1 � 7 t0 � � � .� 'm cow ° J2 �' N C eN �' R r A ul� Q Chi CD 61 6� _A �"�1.0 �% C8 MID W T V. s 0 A .0 .�o'C 7e C ^y, C �{ ►L .fir f/i > 1 L LL L�� a N $. CCIL c cc) cc m Sa n, IM rL G Z 0'4c AmW El: l i co U :) v tCiD' libibit ion 1I Pit Ir 1171!1 W14 I t * 11.1 ,� � � fj if��i� ,�t ttiss•ft,ct�•`!' 1 111i1711 ��.. Jill .sst Ill 1 ILI :alt ;' �',.._��,=e'i'ro �� ' 11+ 1 f: � II iu. tj: ^1'1� •. � •�f Ark,. i 1II I LOOtion Platt 7 lu .I ro,,, � � � � .� � \ v a3m#!t ! | � �ƒ � � ■ � lu .I ro,,, � � � � .� � \ v a3m#!t ! | � . � � ■ � .. . �.. � ° $ ■ � . � < ■ .. . �K ` k.\ . \ / 1�3 11 ■ 1 � r � NN . 1 � h , •: !;11l ;.,,,. -�� j ..�.,. ! ��r�t : �. . ■.: ..�, ..�; �.,. �, A �.�� ,' ��• ��M ,,s t`.' ...J A'��'�'� y��, �4�'�'�, � �`�* ...Z �. Z .. .. r LK `Z1 VAN Lo"Uon Ply 1-36 11 g Y'o _ Embit 15 i.. E V'-4 �7 :41 n.o. • s n Js fit i. li LocaU*A Plan 9 �m lim 7 NINO, :41 n.o. • s n Js fit i. li LocaU*A Plan 9 �m lim H� 4 • Exhibit 16 r i y r OT t' l� Lo=Uon Flame 10 a b e 9 O k a �+ a �a r�t M M a s w� Ezl�b$t 17 r !. 4 �Q a �L uw �° L4 44 m 34 o 4 b W b e 9 O k a �+ a �a r�t M M a s w� Ezl�b$t 17 r !. CW ii 'i I�ZS,7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 25, 1989 TO: Chairman and Plemoers of the Planning Commission F_ :.A: William J. Silva, PE., Deputy City Engineer Brad Buller, City Pianner SY: Laura J. Ponaccorsi, Landscape Designsr SUBJECT: Revised Street Tres Progras Terri, Vista I. BACKGROC90: Four months age, Lewis Noses prsssnted a nsw Terra Vista s r Trot Plan to -Planning and Engimring ,etaff. TM proposed plan was intended to replace the Landscape' Suppi*-A*nt, a staff approved document that both Lewis Hms; and staff had been using, but v*ich had become outdated for various reasons. Staff has htsn working closely with Leeds Homes over the past months to arrive it this final tree oalette. II. ANN.YSIS: - Attached for your Wormation is the revised street tree ppal'#W -for major streets in Terra ViCtte. In the revised pan, more evergreen species will alicviate same of tie bareness of the currant street :,cams predominantly deciduous tracts. The proposed species art gentraliy drought a A windr resistant and not the aesthetic consIderations called fOr in 'do Master Plan. The tree palettes have also been coordintatsd i4r, ransistency with the Master Plans being daave'oped for Haven AvewA*, We Line Road and Milliken Avenue. Perimeter median trots art, not addressed in the proposal. Bosch Planning and Enoneering staff have reviewed and approved v!* streetseape proposal with the following conditions: i 1, Th:t Leis homes Commit to revising existing non-conforming street trees to Comply with this 40cument. a. That tree replacements occur in approved phases, so as not to strip the coals pity of it, s. most matures tress all at once. 3. Trees will be formally planted at 20 fast on center unless specific Conditions dictate otherwise. IrErI W1 w,_4 INS COMISSION STAFF REPORT REVISED STREET•TRFE ORVAAM - TERRA VISTA JMUAR`f 28, 1480 c GE TWO III. RECOMENDATION: MQHG regUired• Respectfully submitted, William J. Silva, P. E. ler Deputy City Engineer City " arror WJS:BB:LJA :Sja Atuchwntz: Terre Vista Strei *tscaPe Smeary ACCENT TREES: JACARAWA A UTIFOLIA (JACARANDA) NELREUTERIA BIPINNATA (CHINESE FLAME TREE) ALSIZIA JULIBRISSIN (SILK TREE) LIQUIUANSAR STYRACIFLUTA (SWEET GUN) PLATANUS RACENOSA (CALIFORNIA SYCAMORE) 1 3 :TERRA VISTA SYREETSCAPE SUWRY MILJKEN AVENUE PARKWAY - PINUS "ANARIENSIS (CANARY MAND PINE) CINHA' SUM CAMPHORA (CAMPHOR TREE) MEDIAN - PINU: iNARIENSIS (CANARY ISLAND PINE) LAW .DEMIA INDICA (CRAPE MYRTLE) SPRUCE AVENUE PARKWAY - PINUS CANARIENSIS (CANARY ISLAND PINE) ACCE67 - LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA (CRAPE MYRTLE) ROCHESTER PARKWAY - BRACHYCHITON POPULNEUS (BOTTLE TREE) FOOTHILL BOULEVARD PARKWAY - PLATANUS ACERIFOLIA (LONDON PLANE TREE) ACCENT - PINUS CANARIENSIS (CANARY ISLAND PINE) HAVEN AVENUE PARKWAY - BRACHYCHITON POPULNEUS (BD'ME TREE) ACCENT - MAGNOLIA GRANDIFLORA "ST. Wt4RY" (M1RLIA) BASE LIME ROAD PARKWAY - OINUS CANARIEKsIS (C.1ii AY ISWO PINE) MAGNOLIA GRANDIFLORA "ST. TRY" (FAGNOLIA) ACCENT - LIQJIDAMBAR 5TYRXIFLUA (SWEET GUN) CHURCH STREET ARBOR - MAGNOLIA GRANDIFLORA "SAMEL SOMMER" (MAGNOLIA) OPEN LOOP - LIQUID STYRACIU=LUA (SWEET GUM) BRACHYCHITON POPULNEUS (BOTTLE TREE) MEDIAN - LAAERSMEIIIA I1Z;!dX (CAPE MYRTLE) TERRA VISTA PKWY. ARBOR - S'WALIA 6';LWIFLORA "SAWUEL SCR" ((WHOLIA) OPEN LOOP - LIUOIDASBIA'R STYRACIFLUA (SWEET GUN) 6RI HYCHITON PVJLNEUS (BOTTLE TREE) M' DIAN - LMCRSTROB41A INDICA (CRAPE MYRTLE) MOUNTAIN VIEW DR. PARKWAY - CUP#WIOPSIS A91ACA'DIOIDE- (CARROTWOOS) TOWN CENTER DRIVE PARKWAY - GEICERA PARVIFLOM (AUSUALFAN WILLOW) ELM AVENUE PARKWAY - NELALEUCA LINARIIFZtAA (FLAXLEAF PAPEROM) ORCHARD AVENUE PARKWAY - IMAl.EUCUI QUINQUINERVIA (CAJEPUT TREE) POPLAR DRIVE ?M01AY - RMS LANCEA (AFRICAN SMIAC) BELVINO WAY FAWAY - RHUS LAMEA (AFRICAN SUKAC) ACCENT TREES: JACARAWA A UTIFOLIA (JACARANDA) NELREUTERIA BIPINNATA (CHINESE FLAME TREE) ALSIZIA JULIBRISSIN (SILK TREE) LIQUIUANSAR STYRACIFLUTA (SWEET GUN) PLATANUS RACENOSA (CALIFORNIA SYCAMORE) 1 3 .TERRA VISTA. STREETSCAPE SUMMARY MILLIKEN AVENUE PAR&AY - PINUS CANAPIENSIS (CANARY ISLM 0 PINE) CIN'U1 CAMPAORA (CAMPHOR TREE) MAN - PINUS CANARIEWSIS (CANARY ISLAND PINE) LAGERSTROE141A INDICA (CRAPE MYRTLE) SPRUCE AVENUE PAILKWAY - PINUS CANARIENSIS (CANARY ISAM U PINE) ACCENT - LlU SERSTROEMIA INDICA (CRAPE MYRTLE) ROCHESTER PARKM4Y - BRACHYCHITOR POPULNEUS (BOTTLE TREE) FOOTHILL BrYJLEVA;M PARkt,"SN - PLATANUS ACERIFOLIA (LONDON PLANE TREE) AC "ENT - PINUS CAMIENSIS (CANARY ISLAM PINE) HAVEN AVENUE PARKWAY - BRACH7CHITON POPULNEUS (IMME TREE) ACCENT - MAGNOLIA GRANDIFLORA -ST. AARY" (MAGNOLIA) BASE LINE ROAD PARKWAY - PINUS CANARIENSIS (CANARY ISLAND PINE) MMLIA 4NRANDIFLORA "ST. WY" (MAGNOLIA) ACCENT - LXQUIDM W SrfPj ;IFLUA (SWEET M CHURCH STREET ARM - NAG.WLIA GRANDIFLOUA "SAMUEL SOM R* (KWMLIA) (SWEET OUR) Is OPEN LOOP - LIQUIDAMBAR STYMIFLUA BRACHYCHITON POPULNEUS (BOTTLE TREEI MEDIAN - LAGERSTROEKIA IWOICA (CME MYRTLE) TERRA VISTA PKWY. ARM - PAW -1.1A GRANDIFLORA "SAMUEL SOMMEV (hNAG MLIA) SrIMIFLUA (SVEET GUM) OPEN LOOP - LIQUI9AU+NUiAR M WHYCHIT06 POPULNEUS (BOTTLE TREE) MEDIAN - LAGER ®%IA INDICA (CRAPE MYRTLE) .7jr.AIN VIEW DR. PAUOEWAY - CUN"ANIOP'SIS ANW.PMIOLDES (CAAROTWOOO) TOWN C €LATER DRIVE PARKWAY - 6EICEAA PARVIFLORA (AUSTRALIAN WILLOW) ELM AVEME PARKWAY - NELALEMA LINARIIFOLIA (FLAXLEAF PAPERBAW1 ORCHARD AVENUE PAWAT - WLALEiUCA QUINQUINERVIA (CADENT TREE) POPLAR WIVE PM UT - RRUS LANCEA (#RICAN UK) BELVINO WAY PAW AT - RN(US LANCI A (AFRICAN SUMAC) t ACCENT TREES: JACAE ,,WA ACUTIFOLIA WAVU ANDA) KOELRElUTERIA SIPINNATA (CHINESE FLAME TREE) ALBIZIX JULISRISSIN (SILK TREE) LIQUIDAMM STYRACIFLUA (SWE27. GUN) PLATANUS RACEMSA (CALIFORNIA SYCAMORE) -- lut • z moll, IF aim 46 7F ig lit =44 JL nd R 214A ■ AFL - fl _ .� jt4 Y¢� [film Ok v 2i EN ggs- NZ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 25, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning CoWssi n FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dan Cvie -ran, Senior Planner SUBJECT: CARYN (VINTAGE HIGHLANDS) FENCING - Discussion of possible amendmr.nt to rega re fencing o cul -de -sac streets from the paseo trail system. I. ABSTRACT: This is a resident request for the Commission to consider 'initiating an amendment to the Caryn Commounity Plan to allow fences between cul -de -sac strE s and the trail system. Only the Planning Commission or City -auncil may initiate such an amendment.. II.. BACKGROUND: The Caryn Planned Commmuunity, known as "Vintage Amok gfiT Aia -nos , is nearing completion. The community is designtd to be centered an a system of recreational open space. This open space system consists of a series of greenbelts which are connected to each -rrl -de -sac street. These greenbelts or "paseos" tie individual neighborhoods together and provide access to recreational opportunities. The greenbelts are also intended to provide a sage route for school children to reach the elementary school. This greenbelt concept is central to the land plan for the community as explained in the community plan excerpts attached (see Exhibit "D "). In the Caryn Planned Co;aunity, the trail system has been strengthened by laying out streets in a manner which provides convenient access to the trail system from anywhere within the community. The cul -de -sac streets side -on to the greenbelts and were intended to open onto t;te landscaped paseo system. The cul- de -sac streets were aligned so that their location provided not only access to the paseo, but access to the opposing cul -de -sac. The fences in question were installed by the developer as: a temporary barrier during construction activities for Phase I wad have remained as construction is occuring in Phase II (easterly half of Vintage Highlands). These temporary wood fences are simply an extension of the woad fences used in the rear and side yards of the homes. The fences have helped mitigate the inconvenience and unsightliness of construction for the residents in Phase I. The rough grading of Phase II had created a grade difference which ITRI x PLANNING COMMISSIAN STAFF REPORT CARYN (VINTAGE HI6NLANDS FENCING) January 25, 1969 Page 2 12 dropped off sharply from Phase I. The temporary fences also provided a safety ba,,,ricade until finish grades could be established,. The fences were never intended to be permanent as they would interfere w'th the concept, of open access 'from the cul- de- sacs to the trail system. III. RESIDENT CONCERNS: The residents petitioning the Commission to allow a ences to stay all live on Manoot� Peak Court which lies on the west side of a greenbelt (see Exhibit "B "), This particular greenbelt connects the Community Trail along Banyan to the elementary school at its south end. The same trail /cul-de-sac conditions exists throughout the Vintage Highlands community. The residents have expressed several concerns with the fences being removed as outlined in their letter (see Exhibit "A "). Briefly, the residents are concerned that opening their street to the trail will cause potential animal control problems, such as coyotes or stray d'o'gs. The residents have presumed that trail access to Banyan would increase burglaries. The present fencing condition encloses their street and prevents children from straying into unsafe areas. Lastly, the residents state they assumed when purchasing their homes that the street would be closed off. As justification to their request, the residants cite the City Council's previous approval to fence the ends of certain cul -de -sac streets within the Terra Vista Manned Cosmounity..Staff notes that the circumstances and issues were different, in that the streets 1 opened onto a major, street rather than a passive greenbelt. It should be noted that staff has also met with residents who support the original community plan concept of open access to the trail. IV. RECCAENDATIQN: Staff recommends that* the Commission consider Public- tai' ny both for and against V,, proposal and consider the following options: 1) Initiate Amendment to Caryn Community Plan, or 2) Direct staff to provide additional information, or 3) No action, Staff recommends that the Commission not initiate an amendment. v PLANNING COWI;SION STAFF REPORT CARYN (VINT:QE HIGHLANDS FENCING) January 25, 3989 Page 3 Resp�ulI u tted�ll r BrdB r r city Ila nor BB:DC:ko Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Residents Letter Exhibit "B" - Pased landscape Plan Exhibit "C" - Location trap Exhibit "D "'- Excerpts From Community Plan 11377 Mammoth Peak Court Alta Boma., California 91701 January 9, 1989 Mr. Jan Coleman, Senior Planner City of R!_-=Yho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701 Dear Mr. Coleman, 1] Per your request, the following is a summary of the major concerns of the residents of Ylammoth Peak Court in regard to opening tne'cul -de -sac: 1) Animal control- There are numerous coyotes in the surrounding wilderness areas. They freauently come right up to the borderinp.iences of our neighborhood. During the period of time when the cul -de -sac was open, we had two sightings of coyotes on the cul -de -sac, In addition, there are many stray dogs in the area. Opening the cul -de -sac will allow them easier access to our street. 2) Security - The area north of Mammoth Peak is undeveloped and, if the county has its way, will remain so. The .solation of Banyan would make it ideal for burglars wishing to have a car waiting. A car circling on our street would arouse suspicion, but Banyan is un''',erved and lightly travelled. If there is a pathway frL =L: Banyan to Mammoth Peak, it would make a burglar's job that much safer and easier. 3) Child Safety- The arrangement; currently in existence keeps the younger children on the block frota wandering too far. If the cul-de -sac is open, the area north of Banyan could constitute an "attractive nuisance ". The county, presumably, has a water retention basin in this area, guarded only by a pole gate, allowing easy access. Rattlesnakes are not uncommon and other Hazards exist for children that might wander into this area. 11 '` #4 4) Aestbnties and other intangibles- *done of the residents that I've talked to have indicated that they knee this cul -de -sac wcmld be open when they bought their house. Mineral Peak Court, the "mirror image" street to Ranmoth,'is closed. A cul -de -sac generally implies YL closed street, accessible from only one entrance. Purchases are frequextly made on cul- de -sac3 because of this. We have groan used to the fence and like our street cla,�. These are the reaeons generally outlined in our letter of August 23, 1963 to grad Buller. This letter was signed by twenty -three residents, including those living in the c:leven houses closest to, or on, the cul -de -sac. ITo one who waz asked to sign d--clined. As an aside, there is a precedent to olosing cul-de-sacs which were sche6alled for opening. on January 7, 1987, the city council voiced 5 -0 to close certain cul -de -sacs in the Terra Vista development. In the words of one councilmember, "...the open cul - -de -sacs sounded like a good idea at the time, but it's obviously proved otherwise. ".. I believe this to be,the case here. We are not asking -for a nhange in the master plan. Any action taken should be limited to our street because of the special circumstances. Sincerely, L lonald K. Ferman P.S< If Brad Buller is available Za.aary 18, 179 or'20, I would be happy to arrange a neiA- ,hb,.hood mee% ins at my house tc discuss this. I I-rili call yru later in the week or you can leave a. message at 944- 0040. is 11577 Mammoth Peak Court Alta Loma, California 91701 Amok ,august 28, 1988 Mr. Brad Buller,•City Planner r City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. 'Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 --0807 .`w,3 x Dear tor. Buller, The undersigned residents of Mammoth Peak Court hereby request a change it the current city plan requiring removal of the fence located at the end of the cul—de—sac nn Mammoth Peak, thereby opening the court to Banyan Street and Mount Whitney Court. Among our concerns and 0,49ervatione are the following: 1) The area Yorth of Banyan is currently undeveloped and, according to county plans, will remain so for at least the next fifteen years. This area is a haven for c.iyotes, wild dogs and other animals and the pathway from Banyan, will allow easy access for these animals, possibly end our children and pats. angering 2) The isolation of Banyan presents a security problem, as it would be an ideal dropoff point Zdr someone wishing to + accessr our homes. withlessch h Pathway s m seen and chaallengedeby one of our neighbors, 3) The fence currently helps prevent our children from wandering away from the neighborhood. Our younger ohildrea can safely play et the end of the block. removal of the fence would change this. 4) Those of us with children who will be attendin Ca n lUementary find more advantage to maintaining the fence than removing from theen i do-P the street whenn going rthe tlong Way and there are no major struts to cross. V - - - - . - " - - - , 44-1 1 5) The small plot of grass currently e, the end of tho block is Watered, fertilized and generally well maintained by the homeowners.. Changing the grass to ground cover will not add to the appearance of the neighborhood and will certainly not make up for the lack of park facilities in this development. The homeowners feel that, on the whole, removal of this fence would be detrimental to the neighborhood and reque9t �! !that the pla- n-be� changed to maintain the status quo. Original Poor Quality ,` /� /' lav�JlC -Z %✓ Ctc�i Zincerely, /!.3 `rS % %t�,e...io-�. Yom-- �• Mammoth Peak Homeowners �S" iiiFiflG F• 617- I!'Sr 77 JUG► � is 5, s3 )G4e 4t7' I / � r I •ci 11561 ! � S'i `Z� %r �Ju= :�Ltl+"'f4 �..� J.�L it� r %_• r , ,'.,L 't 'r A04 L iL� � ~� %; `+ �4i '�'Nr.�t•,r :: rL.11> '''?ri K• �' Por. Traof No. 1293,9^8-187/4247 (E)431@44 (D 4 is 33 a 32 m 3Ts �O o � r 32 34 33 30 .Cd i 4 n�� v '.t Q b 4S _ 44 ,rcet Map lila 91SS, PM. r4k<w -42 'Oct No. 's. MG.207 /64 -k7 MO No. I_5SF,M6.Z06194 -96 tact No. 12944, MR 192/96 -102 E 'Ity of Rancho Cucamonqa 225 - 22 Tax Rate k-vrc 15079,15071,15090 8Ah7AN � S7REET Jp {��. ' MA♦ Kr► KY K.w. K..• AX4* ALI. 1KM .047 • • ��. sPyrtr !� uA, 4 024 Q 25 ♦ y {♦t s 4a Qts N� ell l,� s• � sf `�3z s �a .� )4 83 ®f c4 �04: } ®43 Aj.MW " PIP 94 010!y,�� QM- 24 Par. SWI /4 Svc. 30, T. IIV . R.6W. ME �- - RitYtetCK AsssAar's Map tl //7/4t P g /vin x Back 225 Pops 22 r s es. x i Son 8ernardono County l Car n Planned Community iA/evelopm e-111t` Plan Vintage Highlands city Of Rancho Cucamongel= California 12 For: Caryn Company Kaufman and Broad, Inc. Marlborough Development Corporation Hy: Land /Plan /Design Group JUNE 1986 4 t Ll B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION the Project site contains approximately 244 acres of -alluvial wash, gently sloping at approximVely 4 1/2%, located at the- base of tNe Son Gabriel Mo mtain foothills. It is situates, P the City of Rimchn Cucamonga and north ' the planned community of Victoria. he site is defined by the propose -d Foothill Freeway to the south, the extension of Milliken Avenue to the west, the extension of Banyan Avenue to the north, and the extension of Rochester Avenue to the oast, The proposed Planned Community (P.C.) lsa single- family residential community, containing approximately 440 dwellings at buildout of the current proposed plan. The community"s special identity Is a system of open space that .ties the community together. Tha backbaine of this open space network is the parkway corridor. It links the north -south pedestrian gumbelts and the %I emetatary school; it connect:` the community to major north -south arterials, ohd to the possible future commercial center All homes are on cut -de -sacs or closed loop streets which connect to controlled access collector loop streets. These in turn lead to the community parkway road. The arterial roadsatiutting the P.C.have been . 'sized to occomodote possible future development to the north of the P.C. To the south of this project, the right -of -way for the Foothill Freeway is preserved. All stre0s will be dedicated public streets. Where approlate these will be maintained, along with the parks a-id trails, by an assessment district. Phase I .s planned for single- family detached homes. North of the project parkway 5,500 to 11,000 square foot lots are planned, and south of the parkway 4,O00 to IQ %0 sc� 1 font lots are planned. Kaufman & Broad, Inc. and Marlborough Development Corporation, the two builders for the site, will utilize both lot sizes. This arrangement should produce approximately sixteen differert basic house designs and fifty or more different exterior designs, in different color schemes. Exhibit 4 on the following page is the proposed land use plan. - II. LAND USE A. RELATIONSHIP TO CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.iMA GENERAL PLAN The original laid use plan was approved in accordance witiy the County of San Bernardino West Valley :- uothills Community Plan. Upon annexation to the City of Rancho Cucan-,nga, slight modifications occurred,,, the current plan identified in thsi'text and exhibits is consistent with 06 ',City of Rancho Cucamonga' +;General Plan and has been approved by the City Council. This proposed development is a community of single-family homes, compatible with Victoria, a planned residential community immediately south of the project site. Each home within this proposed project is on a cul -de -sac which opens up onto an open space or grienbelt,system. Evevy street /sidewalk system conntts to a trail network. Each sub - neighborhood, as defined by an interior loop street, focuses upon a part of the open space system. The park -like character of the project is supported at the neighborhood level by a street tree heirarchy for 'focal streets, loop streets, parkway, regional collectors,_ trails, and community park. The common theme foa this community is the open space system which provides an overall focus and a sense of identity. This project utilizes the road standardl. of Vi.toria and Rancho Cucamonga to extend the feeding of that community. The character of this proposed P.C. is based upon the idea of an integrated open space system similar to the planned community of Victoria. Like Victoria, the proposed P.C. uses a network of open space to link the community to the neighborhood park, the commercial center and to regional open space and Transportation corridors. Central to this open spadt system is the parkway which structurally," integrates the residential development with the neighborhood park, via street trees, trails, and park spacer,. 13 ILA A-a & Cft tIIJ 1"' Ao t n-r+ EXH181T 16 LANDSCAPE ILLUSTRATIVE .46- Ea ter'` VI. COMMUNI TY DESIGM The P.C. is designed to be compatible with the plan" red community of Victoria, which is adjacent to the south. • The P.C. focuses on an open space system which ties together the whole community through a network of trails and park space.. The open space sys- tem provides a sense of identity for the community 1 and access to communities and regional recreation. The landscape palette is designed to be cornpat* :le with the landscape, character of cstabiished�.ommuni- ties like Etiwenda and with Victcria. As the site slops to the south at 4%±, an attempt hcxs been mode to keep al the roads at grcde. IV141here graded slopes occur between lots, and in accnrdonce with the City of Rancho Cucarrongarcare will be taken to reduce runoff and erosion. The toe and crest of any slope over 5 feet in vertical height will be rounded and designed in proportion to the total height of the slope. Prior to the pin -ement of fill ail slopes greater thin 5 feet will be watered and wheel rolled. Ali slopes greater than will be hydroseeded and irrigotccL The road system within the P.C. helps to both defiv t neighborhoods and to tie together the whole commun- ity. The . "i6p stree'rs d( 'create neighborhoods. Within !� each neighborhoc:'c street.• pro- vides residents access to their Domes to the open space and park system. The parlency widens o,:� :,'--nrver a loop street intersects, to prov'ida zizmbll park space as a visual terminus. Thus, the parkway ties together all the neighborhoods and the park as it flows through the community. The character of t!ie P -C. and unit, of the neighborhoods will, be achieved througtr the vse of plant materials. At the Milliken and Rochester entrances to the commwsi'y a low slumped block entry sign announces the neme of the community to residents and visitors. Along Milliken, Banyan and Rc, hitter Avenues and the Foothill Freeway, a decor- ative slumped block wail at the same character cs the entry signs, will ,buffer noise, pr,Niide privacy, and identify the cons rnunity. Wooden fences will provide privacy far ='�mexvners along the porkwoy, loop streets, and trdiis. See Exhibit 17 for entry sign and perimeter wall charo4ter. wil. CONSc- RVATIQN AND OPEN SPACE A, PRESERVATION OF NATU AL RESOURCES The San Gabriel tiountains are characterized by a variety of natural resin rces. The complex hill and canyon latidforms which supply the scenic backdrop to the val- ley floor also provides the natural hablt..t for wildlife, and the watershed for ground water recharge. Much of the scenic vale of the regional pining area today is attributed to i`s natural features Developm: t iimpoctswill. be minirnbzed by proper pla xiing on-; monageitlent. Attention will be liven to pr; per Sradi7ij proctbryes, to oomerve topsoil and pre- vent erosions. Contour grading techniques will be util- ized to blend rlth the existing natural terrain and where possible, eroded s!opes., if ri.proved by,a soil engineer, shod: may reach a maximum r atle of 1-1 /2:I iatiowd .n used for contouring purposes in limited areas. Tj maintain the feeling of the natural landscape and to in>egrote thst project into i he adjccent communities, antntion will be given to the use of landscape mater- ial& hat are native and/or drought toleront, acrd which are similar to those foud in odjoin1rKj communities. B. PRODUr -TIC N OF NATURAL RESOURCES Within the vicinity of tie pl caning area, there are two known reseri � 4 ht;lh quallt,` aggregate, can essentials ' Arsg material. :it is likely that extraction operation's -will occur sornFS distance north of the P.C. 1owevesrs,prot;uction of these mater,als is not economicot on-Aie project site. C. OUTDOOR 'iCREATION I n addition to the regi"I recreational oroortunitiez which have bmi descried in Sectioei IV, D-W, Conn- munNy Facilities -Parks and Omen Sp+w:e, the project rill provide a pedestrian oriented open spact: txstenn. (Exhibits 3, 13, and 14 ). The open space system is based upon a g Feenbelt concept in which project cut-de-sacs took onto the greenbelt teciis. These greeneelts act as a continuous open spar.: element tying together individual neighbor- hoods into a coherent community. Theses greenbelt corrider3 also provide - ess ttorth of the site to regional recreational * porturities. This project pro - 1 San Bernardino County, West *11ey Foothills Community Man. (1933), pL 11. b64- C�