Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1989/03/08 - Agenda Packet
0701 -- o3 -8 -8 PC Agenda o .' of 3 ��'ppp C% CAh/hA�,` CrrY OF �+ RwMtfii�wQylC�lt�pJ v4Z ,t���7�'yv��.,Ary (V)NGA /����°�j(�j�� +�+�^+c��� +�7yj+'�, X V\,.717117bge�7►3%1JN J �Sl' AGENDA 1977 WEDNEWAY March 8, 1989 7;00 p.m. LIONS PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA L 'Pledge of Alleghme IL Roll can Commissioner Bla;lcesley_ Commissioner Eme ick Commissioner Chitiea Commissioner McNlel Commissionei, Tolstoy EL Announeements IV Approval of Mbutes Adjourned. Meeting of Janu +?•y 13,1589 Adjourned Meeting of Febr.:x y 2,1 :0 Adjourned Meeting of Febrti�,r;v ^ iS89 Februafy 8, 1989 Y. Consent Calender The following Consent Caioindar items are expected to be routine and non°corntrov3mial. They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any Oem, it should be removed for diacussiom VL Elie Hearinp The foMwing items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Flemie wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your *name and address. All such opinions 3hali be limited to 5 minutes per indWI al for each project. A. ENVIRONMENTAL AWSSMBNT AND DEVELOPMENT W M - 1 a tnon o seen a epartmenti units to an existing apartment complex consisting of 63 un3itS on 5.33 adc-"f land in the Medium Residential District (8 -144 dwelling units per acre), located on the east side of Archibald Avenue, south of Church Street - APNe 1077- 332 -25. (Continued frown January 25,1989.) B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AN#1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89-02 - WMD OF LIFE - 'Thee. quest to establish a church in a leased space o 3,0;0 square feet within an existing- ;Auiti- tenant industrial perk on 8.72 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 3) of the industrial Specific Plan, located at 904E7 APrqw Rr ute - APN: 209 -012- 19 C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 87-12 BLtRGUNDY CREEK. LTD. - A request to amend the Development District Map froth i Flood Ccntrol (FC) to Medium Density Residential (14) (8 -14 dwelling units per acre), which encompasses 1.51 ',.;res of rn land located on the west fide of Caelian Avenue, approximately 1,000 feet swith of Calla del Prado - APR; 207- 022 -64. D. VARIANCR 89 -02 _ NUWEST -- A request to align* three (3) wall signs to exceed the maximum height Umit of twenty (20) feet within an existing commercial center, located at the outh ^- st corner of Foothill Boulevard a, d Hellman Avenue - APh: 208- 261 -25 and 26. , VIL Ifew Business E. MODIFICATION TO THE VIRGINIA DARE PARKING STUDY A review of modbfications to the shared parking concept and projected parking demand for the Virginia Dare Centtsr. VIM Diteefnoes Itegorts i F. MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 89 -07 - A. W. DAVIES a A request to add 710 square feet of office space to an existing building and warehouse ,totaling 4,560 square feet on 3,82 acres of ..-nO ;a the General industrial District (Shares 3) of the Industrial Specific Plan, located on the southeast corner of 9th Street and Helms Avenue - APN: 209-031 -53 and 54. (Continued from February 8, 1989.) G. UPDATE ON CITY COUNCIL GROWTH MANAGEMENT WORK HOP H. REVIEW OP CONCEPTS FOR FIRE STATAONS NUMBERS 4 AND 5 Oral Repor i M. Gommiesiern Av ine w X. 14*116 Comments Phis i4 the rime and place for the general public to address the C0,41i?ttstom Items to be discussed here are those which do not already Appear on this agenda. XL Adjontnmen The Planni"g COMMission has adopted Administrative ,Regulations that set an 11 p.m. adjournment+ time. If items go beyond that time, they shat; be heard only with the consent of the Commission. %✓ . _ _. is . , k 1/1C�t',�liY MAP tlpf / \tQ 14f{}RR /f)Oil /L G1R{Zyp i cw Rim" s, t 1 'eft MATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: wa1 x WX 4WX1"1%JXAW V V V[71I1V19VA STAFF REPORT March 8, 1989 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brae, Buller, City Planner tom Grahn, Assistant Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AH0 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -26 - SMTR - e a ono s6 +err aparW uni ts o an ex suing apartment cWlex consisting of 63 units on 5.33 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8 -14 dwelling units per acre), located on the east side of Archibald Avenue, south of Church Street - APN: 1077 -332- 25, - z I. BACKGROUND: This item was continued from the December 14, 1988 and anuary 25, 1989 Planning Commisslon wW ngs. Design issues pertaining to the design of the carports, modifications to the units facing Archibald Avenue, and modifications to the Archibald Avenue streetscape required further review by the Design Review Committee, IT.. DESIGN REVIEW Chi "TEE: In, addition to the Comittee (Blakesley, u er, Ra rev ew on November 17, 1988, the Committee (Blakesley, Chitiea, Kroutil) reviewed the project on the January 19, 1989 Consent Calendar; however, they did not recommend approval due to the following concerns: 1. The carport design should be similar to the proposed garages. 2. The upgrade of architecture on the units facing Archibald Avenue should include: a) The stucco building projections should be removed. If the elements at the end of the building are not structurally necessary, they should also be removed'. b) Upgrade the light fixtures. c) All roof equipment should be removed. d) The end elevations should be upgraded with architectural elements. ITEM A z PLANNING ZOPMISSiON STAFF REPORT DR 88 -26 - SMITH March 8, 1989 Page 2 El L; The patio walls should be designed with natural stone pilasters and a four (4) foot stucco wall. Patio locations should be centered in front of each unit. 3. The Cal- Shake roof'ng material received conceptual approval: The applicant then revised the project based on issues presEnted by the Committee. The Committee (Emerick, Kroutil, WNW) reviewed the projeci oi�"t�arcfi an recommen a approve base on heto -T1ow a chances: 1. The design of the carports Should be consistent with the design of the garages. 2. landscape planters should be provided adjacent to the carports to soften their appearance. 3. h'bdifications to the units facing Acrhibald Avenue should Include: a. Removal of ,ignage on 'the build -Ings. b. Pilaster;, on the patios should be of a native stone and . not a man0actured stone. c. Increase the patio areas on the corner units to wrap j around the side elevation. d. Accent trira around the windows and doors should be of wood and not stucco. e. The size of the stucco elements on the building sides I should be expanded to eighteen (18) inches. f. Remove the existing freestanding light fixtures. III. RECOWNDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Comaission approve Deve opmen eview 88-25 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval, with conditions, and the issuance of a Negative Declaration. s d, /4slly r er /f -22 PLANNING COMMISSION STAGP REPORT DR 88 -26 - SMITH ?arch 8 1989 Page 3 88 :TG:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Modifications to units PCing Archibald Avenue Exhibit "B" - Modified Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Modified Landscape Plan Exhibit "D" - Modified Cjrpurt Design Staff Report from Decenwer 14, 1988 Resolution of Approval with Conditions an e a= Original Poor Qualify 1 4 t s S• �,.� t ...a j lit 1 7r �? IIg:3� I' V 0 z � 6 r Et 1 r Y a n i 10 r2l ()riginal Poor Quality C=Am� wl MA�= WW-q;= Z-A� -ypl Orr - 40 0*0: L T C=Am� wl MA�= WW-q;= Z-A� -ypl CAX,M * W.. K�CVIXAM 4AM rfA Original Poor Quality 4ow-mom 1 CAP FAGCA& El lilt L-1 tit I co CY I- 0 0 Q_. ITEM: t1b -2.� TITLE: PhW9 6(1 tig EXHIBIT! r AVIA'TPt �- c$ C' O O Cl- co c .Eb .i 0 CITY O RANCHO CjUCAIAON E �,tvtQt�� d TITLE :U (*V _cittitA EXHIBIT: w � ...�... SCALE: : __-- - ..� i TITLE :U (*V _cittitA EXHIBIT: w � ...�... SCALE: : __-- - ..� -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA s >� STAFF REPORT DATE: December 14, 1988 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Ruder, City Planner BY: Tom Grahn, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -26 - e addition o seven apartment units to an exiling apartment complex onisistinea of 63 units an 5.33 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located on the east side of Archibald Avenue, south of Church Street - APR: 1077 -332- A. ActionnRRe%ested: Approval of the Site Plan, Grading Plan, Landscape Pfan,—building elevations and the issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Project Density: 11.82 dwelling units per acre (existing) ,I 1x.13 dwelling units per acre (proposed) C. Surroundina Land Use and Zoning: rth vacavit; urfice Professional South - Marlborough V111as; Medium Residential (4-6 dwelling units per acre) East - Marlborough Villas; Medium residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) West - Single Family residential; Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) D. General Plan Designations: um es dential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) North - Office South - Medium Residential (P,,14 dwelling units per acre) East - Medium ResiNential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) West - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) E. Site Characteristics: Tile project site is located directly east of e ex s ng apartment complex. Vegetation on the site consists only of seasonal grasses. PLANNING COWISSION STAFF REPORT VR 88 -26 - SMITH December 14, 1998 Page 2 E" II. ANALYSIS: A. General: This project is an extension of an existing 63 unit ap "T.FkEmenb complex. The extension will consist of seven (7) three- bedroon apartment units; each unit is comprised of approximately 1,135 square feet, plus an enclosed two -car garage. B. Design Review Committee: The proposed site plan, landscape plan, an _ u `tdinations were reviewed by the Committee on November 17, .088 (B1akesley, Buller, Chitiea) The Committee recommended Lpproval of the project sutject to the following. 1. Fifty percent of the total required covered ;jarking spaces for the entirc complex should be within garages. 2. The chain rink fence along the north property line should be remov d and a eecorative blocV w?ll should be installed. The wall s;,culd be consistent with the walls along the east and south property tines. The final wall design should be included on the landscape plan. 3. Improvements to the Archibald Avenue streetscape should include: a. Landscaping consistent with the `andscape concept for Arcn,�ald Avenue including street trees, me hdering sidewalk, berming, eft. Contact the EngiTne&ing Division for specifications. b. Removal of the 3 foot high bl i:k wall. 4. The architecture on units facing Archibald Avenue should be upgraded to include: a. Installation of tile roofs, unless the applicant provides justification that the building cannot support the additional Aaight. b. Add fascia boards to the exposed,ceiiing joists. c. Upgrade the light fixtures. { d. Provide patios of varying widths. The Committee recommended using a 2 foot fence of natural stone and { 2 feet: (approximately) of wrought iron around the patios,. Saw� les of th.^ product should be submitted for review and approvals by the City Planner. A -n PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT lit . 3 -26 - SMIT14 December 14, 1988 Page 3 5. Tile roofs should be provided on the new units and garages. 6. Remove the existing asphalt between the existing and proposed units to the southeast corv+er of the tennis court and landscape tho area. C. Environmental Assessment: Staff has completed the Environmental ec s and found no 3:gnificant adverse environmental impacts as a result 'of this project. If the Commission c.,Incttrs tilth these findings, the issuance of a Negative Declaration would be in order. 111 FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with tie General Plan and Development Code. The project wilt' not be detrimental to the public health or safety, or cause nuisancR� or significant adverse environmental impacts. In addition, the )posed use and the site plan, t6gc -4her with the recommen`.... conditions of approval, are in compliance with applicable provisions of the DEvelopment Code and City Standards. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The yi1y Report newspaper as a public hearing and notices have been sent to al property rwners within 300 feet of this site. V. REC(WMATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve lyeve 7nt�-' iew 88 -26 through the adoption of the attached Res. c Approval with conditions and issuance of a Negative c1� s ctf 11y h tted, ad Buller City Planner BB :TG:mlg Attachments: t:xhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "ft'" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Conceptual landscape Plan ExhiV t "D" - Building Elevations Exhibit "E' - Floor Plan Resolution of Approval with Conditions �AW PLAN SING DIVISION -A-13 E N011 iT- EXHIB M WALE :.e...�. am jor C M 3 � - i'il i4 3 vj ota {t .{ l W Y -. O //0� l.� ten► ryn 4m 1ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION A 6, ITEM: TITLE: ��� ego EXHIBIT: SCALE: r..�..�. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISIO .sue ca CY O O 4 its C� SCALE:., TTIMOAL PRM "AAW WMA"M T"WAL O ""W RMA"OM CITY F V 03 S_ �b9 TTY MW "UN NWIA"M ITEM: EIMi TITLE: ="_,,'I�J EXHIBIT: SCALE: Ax 'ko .100 Ct /L 4/ ,qlj TTMQAL WO GAW4RT EMATON TTMAL "Kura =a "NOW &gV&Twm CITY OF ITEM: L7� mill w • X11 r � i t lITY OF ITEM: Vf- m 2(0 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE : -._* . PLANNING DI` 14ION 14-Oo EXHIBIT: SCALE: CY Cr' a_ O �1rli�IN1 �I�IIpIP R j �N]Y1111111A lITY OF ITEM: Vf- m 2(0 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE : -._* . PLANNING DI` 14ION 14-Oo EXHIBIT: SCALE: CY Cr' a_ O RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING2 COMMISSION OF THE CITE OF RANCH: CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -26, FOR THE ADDITION OF SEVEN (7) APARTMENT UNITS TO AN EXISTING APARTMENT COMPLEX CONSISTING OF 63 UNITS ON 5.33 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, SOUTH OF CHURCH STREET, IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPP%NT THEREOF - APN: 1077- 332.25. A. Recitals. (I) Alan Smith has filed an application for the approval of Development Review No. 8846 as described in the title of Lnis Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is :efgrr?a to as "the application ". (ii) On the 8th of March, 1989, the Planning Comic ;ion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved bf the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in Me Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are ;rue and correct. 2, -P-ised upon substanti -Al evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting on March, 1, 19891, including writ'en and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 7781 Archibald Avenue with a street frontage of 380.00 feet ani lot depth of 611.00 feet and is presently improved with 63 apartment units; aiid (b) The property to the north of the subject sit:) is vacant, the property to the south and east of that site consists of condominiums (Marlborough Villas), and the property to the west is single family residences. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: 14r"ZI PLANNIKG COMMISSION RESOLUTION No. DR 88 -25 - SMITH March 8, 1989 Page 2 r3} That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the C`?eral Plan; and (b) That the p14opli ed use Is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site ys located; and "c) That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code,, and (d) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety,, or welfare} or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4, This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, S, and 4 above, this ,Com- fission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in thi attached Standard Conditions attached hereto r,nd incorporated herein by this reftereMce. Planning Division (1) The design of the carports shall be consistent with the design of the garages, (2) Landscapo planters shall be provided adjacent to the carports, (3) The chain link fence along the north property line shall be removed and a decorative block wall shall be installed. The wall shall be desilied consistent with the walls along the east and south property lines. This shall require an upgrade of the existing wails along the east and south property lines as they are constructed out of precision block, The final wa? ", design shall be included on the landscape plan and shall be reviewed and approved by the City planner prior to the issuance of building permits. (4) Cal -Shake roofing material as peoposea, shall be provi Od on the new apartment units, garages, carports and the units facing Archibald. Avenue. !/t r 2 z- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION- NO.. DR 88 -26 m SMITH March 8, 1989 Page 3 (5) Modifications to the units facing Archiball Avenue shall include. a. Removal of signage on the buildings. b. Pilasters en the patios shall be of a native stone and not a manufactured stone. c. Incr4ase the patio areas on the cornor units to wrap around the-side elevations.. d. Accent trim around the windows and doors shall be of wood and not stucco. e. The stucco elements on the building sides shall be expanded to eighteen (18) inches. f. Remove the sxisting freestanding light fixtures. g. Remove the three (3) foot hign brick wall. i Remove all existing roof mounted equipment. j Engineering Division (1) The southerly drive approach shall be reconstructed to City Standard No, 306, 35 feet wide. (2) The northerly drive approach shall be constructed to Lity Standard No. 305, 35 feet wide, with the southerly curb return aligning with the south edge of the drive aisle. (3) The Archibald parkway shall be relandscaped to conform with the findings of the Archibald Avenue Parkway Beautification Study. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8T11 DAY OF MARCH, 1989. PLANNINa COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RA "tCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry 1. e , Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary t4 _Z 3 PLANNING COWISSION RESOLUTION Now OR 88 -26 SMITH March 8, 1989 Page 4 I, Brid Butter, Secretary of the Planning Comis,fon of the City of Rancho gai u ,se,oaph ef by gtheganniio inu� the reurly Introduced, certify ald d Plng Cmis ob City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Cammission held on the 8th day of r, °arch, 1989, by the foliawing vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COF#IISSIONERS: AGSENT: COMKSSIONERS-, rAm E 0 F� W a IL k,z 31ft�`y'a^ ®/ T il�w�N ~EEp�eNYOOV �'7SLa2 w ue wscia 6LAGy p�QIp CM aGi�yWGG. °yy `yam. .AM ts M.1 °p LY O�ZS 6� a aYyWi i3.L ° p L K g C 0 W = o C qw w 0 u � � ®c L'o i�a6°ay�� GaGu qY ^'csgq �ti��i pkQ d L L G° 4 y G= q 9 O d Y E QN--w. .i4 eLS t`s T0, 2 `y v. CMct$ ales gvk°a .y yq aa:; C.8 LO WaY.° Y• pO ydO.. L ON: {a. v Oi ls aap$�,' C �iqOq�� N ; p4�e NC��> CON cYR IIi NyyC� C tl�C NN �uyi' �a e AOw LAY eL F- Sal &8p Q �� ��� 30 � �� € � -i b NI l.1 4 -2s- RA j N iLS co CY O a.e. 1 uvt: N V s fQo r �^^• W V �9' � MO �M.O W �L Ca•W�' as I fs G)v�cr3 w o M ea ai e {p h,, i CLG a b •��r ..Y''CC4O'Pq .up °' Y ill ee� a• m e� �� ^``'fig r�ZZ3"w 3 : &V : «aa it yv ea.� 4 -2s- RA j N iLS co CY O a.e. 1 A� Y q W b A {� C � Y G A y.l ',� 446^ ■V{L� I -vk. y� ppLN yCYw OpDCG VLC�NC LN; S�wN �O yYw■y + + Na N4p Y< +� �O S1 V + ii C b dcL ��•_N �y yp O�+S7 �U� ���Aa�g �y�ON1V C S'QON q ��qM €�X$ 6LY D,4GC +J qVY �q ,�V N Y v V L~ w �.• i � Cl q ^,��, 'tl JG rS 6ONL :1 fgn 1,•sy°. /tba `M QCiV LN9 asC Y 2 ?++- Y CYC 's° .+'i� v "tL. Zr �. N Y1$ Tfl�� Y••y �Nwn Zl N4.6 VWL' K ^L M qrN e� °k uN1L7 ^e�L=.�YN �' 5 ySw N�1+nnCN .+�' : «» hit. . i _A X a $Q w�q�4y ^65� YLOC V�p ^pp uN6� yN�rYyM NfFNL �C'ACa gNT7 YA C9A NF�G� a�vC �y' NAN�jsg YQg ��pw �7Y C<'•N r c YNp LM +CGQy tic rl S y,Mr• M G+ � G v p z yy g [YYL�ii � z N. g z % � � Y' i O C� E Li14 Y Ci MNO�U NRh tlG`'�tl C� .S N9 ° "��y:. .°•2�NC� }�A :A.'"as v� we:Y el '�° ^���'� i.> u °Y�+ 3. �i uu° � +' S a °oL ���.� o, q"y++a�gi �w�.s. Sy. a.bic•SR �O �«V C�MY rY+.♦ 61.�•4N ff6,�, ... �p0.:}.ii CC ;NC a »� w CQYjp9. ai Si ^•�C�(/ yW ~ 1fy`1��� r �C e't0;»�VMp L��. Yp���.111 N SW N � Ww 7� G K AMi m1i Q! X14 � 6 N Y Y w 117 4 N M 7• y� N V f.i � w v aYnY» •� Y w� �° ^a M4. �'Llo V�V —N y V CL' ss p e� pp O qs a�a LgC'O O.f1 � 214 �uO +� GCy�� r:YC 6Y. '1• � y�A on �py�r� y` C'11 A U O Yp Y !t� +R �i V910+� Y _■ =N NO 'sage . L s 19 M Lam. ny �p C yM q Y Y SiN^H ! Y ya�i Nrwtiy NL,MG $pN gig 7�Y6G °AYT `VQ•y =ypY� DAL CC Swi5 � 606' 3 CYy q }`y S NQ N1u�7 gL U1 CH y� cYyu G_m .�' ` y° epayQ .w4i 42.& 4�CN M V�Np rJ�s +`® CS{, VN.8 m rya �V qQp� 4.fA ^O4 A, h 7X ^qM Ll 'xlp qqq Gr` 42 _M YC pR wUbLO VV N Ito! it y •d!1' �� � +L$$$YYY111 q6 �12, yH�'•p�� ot6MUyP� N J q✓� + L -18 ®•q+ 'S S N P N . k• Y ��y{{7V1���7!! Cy h Yb• 4Q y Miy R^ c ■V �.57 YO "as CY yy.: N_iY N�7+ 449 WU � O C.G �C 1p pY bA pK�,1O WQ ?y0S0L r4. t11 �p G1 Cypww� ��}}ii'= 4 py .yY 41j4%4 ■`�TS3u' Ylp�'y.^yj+ t 'QM1 /y.0 N`wi t ^NO v/1Yll� CU .d: V Y W+in. Y1J. j'y L1 ��n�2a V -V 96 co CY 0 cc 11 N E `q- 6 Y. 01;!Ow f C■ va ;rS CZ J. LW �NM 1 N o A +� O w ow 9�d oo �.+u i'a v4L e'o''7e > 1sd.o2' pi ■N YQ3` N �•�Y� N V iT� f: C� Ad OWq�1 ~CUL NY Y•a dN Y1t8 -^ 0.6 yY. LQ O Cn VO qrd CQOSO� MnYQ y�tlq YN i1C O� zf OE.3. t yq T� Yu��aL u C L Cy b' V^ 'pO 6 Y�O ji G �• �s O M yy C d q N G lr1, C LLC qG aVgaW >"' 'O �d�J¢¢JN rq.Oy dY MCC7 V�•. �,.V q. ^ q._C ~Y g„�YY$�CY11 - L N !a �3Q01Y ■■pp OY� Y�10 M AVN T� ���Y d%WV�. ��Q 41J.S�N .G.• rL .�yp h ^6 �Y CG�w _ 001 Y'.N �'� VVOwNYN.C�Hi.)�Y d.�=NC +' r p MA I o CAL G.n O N t /� Leif ayOd w �NI t 6"S �Y �� Yti� �5 2WgrGyR.2 NO$aa GN �t11�y G VU��r'1C 4� ECW yVY 1t �Ml1��g11 y��N O y Y} 'Y - L OOrO L�N f! rr2 V N ' SNLIV�wA %..S_Q 01VOgf• ia• CT10y Y q O� OIf -3 2Cq qN GO ^ o �zz; � •^Y.�tqO y V EMS EMS y~ O2 G'qa aa �C��M u1 NUp d pp� 1�+ L 0 = CN A •Y E Miq N O I Nu ~�7 ZZ MY�1 �.Zn,GYy Y�Nyq'� 4 YL�L�11�OI1 C'Gw NMd '.LD 14s Mua��� I�Vw ^ M w0 V Y S C Cy � �O- q 664MyYC Y �p� YVc q4` 6N1 ={ TOfE1�yG i9`igO 01M� ^¢ G uN pII` LL s4% z: • 0C Zv y LM■ +r s- V��t ~M ^� N CCLYF YOM ���{y'111 \i.J r,,CVC �p L Y 01 Mr ~YYYN ^ V I �N�1 O N �yC L L �10 V w.'�� yN~dG�gL L Mal ifwily i• ^ OC �.�� 9��M� 0 +� 4 0p1$py 4M N.O �q0� Y' M <CN ha� iJ qO��G �w{ypGC, t G LO tN� G x�1�Gy'LY .�.rr)�aL WO•�rJNYW \10 LNLgL ■N �6 t6 YN OLD g111 �..VGOLI LI 6qqC ^1�C \ \VI GtlA 2J! N +NA✓ <Nrq. <N >•� .. HANG YYy �N GOY r�r 16fY AV H ^T•q.. W �.G. YyYy 6 Y. 01;!Ow f C■ va ;rS CZ J. LW �NM G•C C N N o A +� O w L L yY. q N G' 6yy C D pi ■N YQ3` G''..Y6 O IL O y Yu��aL u C L Cy b' V^ 6 ji G �• �s O M yy C d q N G aY YyypOtly A. 8 y V K V D Va Y N M +� ..2'. . �O2" q 6 M G> i g„�YY$�CY11 - L N !a g� qE 02 %2.v h ^6 �Y CwYa �:.� _ C q� uy q ayji n ypyy1, Z` O�g006Q YC;^ �Ci� �iA Orq. M.p a Leif �> b_ VWw dTMY 9qt_q U IL r$N`y 't~ c1� y��N O y Y} 'Y - L r M V 21 ` I s • 2LLV > Y wec V N ' i N O. ~ C N N O V V' 'i ^ Y. +4 ^ C Y • Y Y q O� OIf -3 2Cq qN GO ^ Y r •^Y.�tqO y V `Y gg GLw & 55 6 q a L w L 0 = 6 Q3 N � YO O�1CO1O y L V 4 .N - C6 gN q J Mua��� I�Vw ^ M w0 V Y S C Cy � �O- q 664MyYC q� �AYO' ... V ���LYYY,,,111 M C N4 N q�1V � LC Vg -lift y O C J}Pew�y 0C Zv y LM■ +r s- LVN •.... CCLYF YOM rd`�q Cy■N^•6`Y r,,CVC �p ru`,^ � r■4 KB.ViI. �Y r�.>. Y��adi NNbL 9��M� �,C�,C� 4M N.O �q0� Y' M <CN ha� iJ �C'.•7 �ONVC. D tN� G x�1�Gy'LY .�.rr)�aL WO•�rJNYW \10 \I \wI C � h1 Pf t 1fil 16 \ \VI N D. -2,7 W 1 f�: N s+ w 5 = 6'. y N4Y Gg 6 AYOL y�Y h �SU bSYgV1 ° 0 0 = c a"' ui y9 — c y 3ca t: "'a9we �4..= �o reL 0 W yr. a §ut ��c mcze`~ ar34'a.0 Y A Y v>�y u� a,s B—WE L. 5 A�? .12-4 qqk, NVg zW $ � �-a L v, L7 4. N U yYy Y N Y L• a°QeA um� s$ � Nil "$ gou2 -,ZVI O � f y i Y��e.. �G�Y. •+ 7 a9 °�Lm upa�±a• `qpna n.,r. � a7 n'CYp q�+t 9�w �1CI A MEN, Yf. e y L Wf��y V y0Y }G d54. cJ W a W L Cam. 'un�y VY LrGaFY V �j .....sss rV SV� Lg� 46wU M 'Po Q + M .�� Sr � w i Y -'Yy -Ise O% V f s 9 Y -. O � . o. w {Y1 upuM + % a y y �tl iRy. .�. ly! p CNOA L V .(j+�$N�{ rYVy� � w Vsl9L Y s j 6d � f ~ � �.� C���- Y +N. v x R 9 y�1 q ti Y ', —Z 2T 'nC L.0 3 N -✓ � f $L'ua c2ffY9 ea 6ywa �N Yb/4M` D f Nit LLCyY1 M PC 4 N YY ff tl Sil f ^� tR frgy *4yy pia 82 e;e w'f C Sr �6C ~t`qMr u tY Upt is■ Ms � Cp 14 c c � YAa a1 oft° o c�nua w d gw�pp ySyyI Ce +r, t•YMC V C Ls 01 UKY ` 4iRY+ 1) 1C Mp �U�w QLrr NAV N N +Cf g L r G q6 N 3i•w �L < Af�. N Fi H J<1 N, L 4 L f � w M OVCLY� ACV pp• w f M 4 � ICS gt *� f O i L Lai pp pq U K� f Y ANA M L 4� �N L 9 L M M O 9 C C S um oSQ 4 O NwM+9 p�o A G 4 Y 010 G a U� 4 ts� L 4 T ~ N �W u ' o q + dN U L � C Y a o� r ye a . a r v C q C L 5 +O G Y1 (ALi Y A 14Q, 4 yyy 11s 2 U Y C g v 4 L 4 w y �y N L u 4C �O M M u dp W 1i+ N L M gga 3 O L M µ CV el p k y L V O" L � z 6 Ya4A Y t v;4 O y e V Ow fsv,. in. .N�. N I. a > am ,a O`a a 4e v� M O CO 11 11 W 9 r�opo gacS NN3 v' No ac 'Qu v •yMi= yaa Y H ati pc! Y O q L. ran p i �■,QpC ib O1t 3Yi6O yyCJ Z 9' A �NCG G =M^ �AgJ�<•YO 0 ,Y'9 i 'a Cf •• 9 V N rb� C N d o a '^ A a Y �' E N CW 9� Y � ^aLr $ V 9N Y m V G y � u WN$ G.M I M'L. �L a Y'� .�...NgNq� O .�. t•yf�. M CM.aNYL v6d O N A d rm L M L N G C 11.o N tl 'd ink NNr�n aQi �'• w�q og $w ; ci. .v. ���.pi L.N. O� V OVA � �IFL V. • Y.Y � N +. Y! Y°.O r1.. C �Y.M �.N C C C M •n !y� G 4L w w CCU�T�� yC eO 0�4!•n a. V+yYy.W rt O` �Y ` E OP .YLNor :61wrY• Y qY Lb HI i23 W Y gYpy G'YEp COG L�Y OYtY t= O1•" G � r M: C L y« �Y L m y M• nl iiiiiirrrri�� Y S ze cc ccCCLE 59 w r+ OVUM 4L E NCbB �C ay"y' L 54 V �L i Q Q YL • y Y r^ N v C p $.'i Y+ ' '�� � ovY "�.� �. � g 4'e`Yic r� �w•�� 'r j��s Pan- YLniH Y a, aS a'8 i° _V, pY `v n'L•y "NC.YT. 2.1 O Lam° « $ ♦ rC} MM ppL }L. rp+� to y+yy Q�11 YG Y C�pq MpK fr �N L 6U� V!1 Gyg3 6G yamy. i0c .°Y _ YsU ii w W'N l•9pyaM N� r+� }^ V �3 63 PO o.M ••`0 N� � �0��! N6 Y y� � °�O � V �q C N yy"O N , D N t q� iC . ^V OOp ■ ,,, Q�N + er 1 YY ^� L � 0�4 Y e ` ■Y q .� y j(( �YC � � e i Lr 0 p G N Mjp fp 6 v � C CQ ,9 rt O a2 Y �!� G rz Mv ` gp c 0 NO � O yc MMY MY 33 jOCI . Yt m o TL +NV uri.•. a +Gea Boa u«. e 1 I � N1 I '31 9 � Zy CG /0 V CL a� LL") I x q n may �i 9 V `O"90 '•� ISLY yU rC Y W Ltl�,. Lpe � CO Ci N G� CO � L � C � � O •. v 9 Y, tlN 1L• p OQY' Y"0j�er� Y V MGCR GN Y_V Yqo 9 a�� V C.Be `Y Y O aY�O`y" 4N tq! �CGY ° Y•� N C KA�C aQ �•Yf�. Oy`�$� G n � • �� V+ 4�YYA E .EaO Go Q- c� G y�tip �a• . }Q 9 Dw.� Y? Hem, �YY SCtH � e'' Yy I -ad Pg (a Y L C C Y� w D CY x Yi Y Y H y,. wtlsI a i- L'e'a Y' P S.. �aoi eE q S. A. as 'd.ur � cTe �i wY ..m c $. � �.0 C.. p�O �W ry�. 1�� ■yuu Y GG;O Y fi^.W ` G y YML O pppO,, AMLV�+1. Z L p tl0 i ^� C «C C� Oc ..0�101� ZN. co L�TYr •� `� 9. k'C Ya Np� YYOM �� +N ��p Nw � ^. aL. O ��YY O M {M�.C.d Y /o YrN "jug �y„•r„y °tLa .Q sT �. NA ■CNy +i a NS �� ` Y $g ++Y���9q`1 p1•i Y�C '� •� L LLY.G Y L OYYY. Yi L N� ONV {{,� Y Y Q•Y� ••� M tV VY i N �� NY~iV�y� yx 4 L YYMIbb. WY �LLti� bYY! Ypp �6C �M� !G c W o; i H A .y .y. 7 W w «w d Y C L a. g xL � ~S C� NyN 6 G O P:1 As CY N 6 A `N 0. Y L N N N�Y •f:� �1 0�I L N V G q 9¢ OF c to �ij.�NU• _+ �. vC•J%� M� N Q1 i.4 R t y q�q Ems �� a N ys O Y 1 N \pS J SD 9 4a- - �K a -Ergs tlr i. �Y G{i C Y vE ILJK �i � +�O�Q+C 6p ... �.. D 0 MC q 3�{ N �' 8CC T K gip. Y N p'a • ES_G L � N O �H Bigy, Ova yygc TYa E 11 I w w 0 i v; aw CO YY 'v a. C�N Y0. 9 ` N /Oa qM VYy .iC.LO O L L� E Fyn gS a ES° g8n C � / C O r 0.N L 0Y0 Y L ■ � Y Y M tl $cS 1 \^ V F M C2 Ld / 7 q ■q■L �G � .C.as/ O AM N }N�{� CC Y 8 0O. SC',I' ► NY/ Y N 9 O.� N(a.•Y$ �0 +�+ Y Lwt� L Y rybp Sbu o uY af .53 it N' V OV■ � W � `'� � • ' •y� N Gi•v 4A `YyC Y w �gyr+ YO _$ 9N O 'cQ, a�aL 2o7i ��.gi 'ppj. to $I YV �NyL.w a �`�p yp T Mp" N' tl� N Y��� �•r "O' yyoN.r C q' W 0.Vf Y 4 fL. F C. Y' cog co A Q C.. L e y O M Cg CC L p�0 �O•„ CL ^M� iC OM YL ca pp Y Y^ 87'u` e L ZWp{�� O. �e N +pp�NC Ywr. Pf� fI NI U U CITY OF RANCRO CUC;AMONGA STAFF REPORT o h � z U > DATE: March 8, 1989 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner ! bt: Steve Hayes, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL* ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89 -02 The request o establish a church n a leased space of 3,050 square feet within an existing multi- tenant industrial park on 8.72 Lcres of land in the General Industrial District: (Subarea 3) of the Industrial Specific Plan, located at 9047 Arrow Route - APH: 209- 012 -19. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a nonconstruction Conditional Use Permit to establish a church within an existing multi- tenant industrial center at 9047 Arrow Route, between Vineyard Avenue and Hellmin Avenue on the south side of Arrow Route. B. Surroundinig Land Use and Zoning. dwelling. units persacre) and;Medium Residential (8- dwelling units per acre). South - Warehouse; General Industrial (Industrial Specific Plan Subarea 2). East - Manufacturing; General Industrial (Industrial Specific Plan Subarea 3) West - Manufacturing /Office; General Industrial (Industrial Specific Plan Subareh 2). C. General Plan Designations: o e-c e - enera ndustrial North - Medium Residential and parks South - General Industrial East - General industrial West - General Industrial �. Site Characteristics: The project site is developed wi ;& an existing mu ti-tenant industrial center. E. Parking Calculations: See attached Exhibit "0 ". ,. _ - iTF'hi B f i PLANNIK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 89"k'? - WORD OF LIFE March S. 1989 Page 2 E F. Applicable Regulations: Industrial Specific plan (Subarea 3) ows c urc ies su , ect to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The Word of Life is proposing to locate it's churc`. n an ex sting multi- tenant industrial complex (Arrow Business Park). The church is pr( using to occupy approximately 3,060 square feet of the build~,] addressed 9047 Arrow Route (see Exhibit "A "). At this time, the proposed church will hold a bible teach.rg class from 7:00 to 9:00 p.m. on Wednesday nights. On Sundays, services are proposed to be held between 9 a.m. and noon and 6 :00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. The church is planning to reserve weekday evenings for other activiti Office hours are proposed on weekdays between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. (see Exhibit "B "). B. Issues: The primary issues related to locating this type of use. within an industrial setting are compatibility i i surrounding businesses and parking availability. There a, a variety of uses within this center, as well as within the building the church is proposing to locate. On many occasions, churches (many of which are larger than this particular church) have been approved to locate in existing multi- tenant industrial complexes. No compatibility problems have ever been experienced, therefore, compatibility problems associated with this proposal are not expected. A total of 61 parking ,paces are required for a sanctuary of 2,010 square feet (1 7a per 35 square feet) and an office of 1,050 square feet (i space per 260 square feet). there are currently 379 parking spaces located on the site. Within 100 feet of the building, there are a;,proximately 95 spaces, which should be more than adequate to provide parking for the church. Parking along Arrow Route should not be necessary, even during peak service hours. Currently, occupants of these and all abutting buildings are required to have 93 parking spaces (see Exhibit "D "). Peak hours for all businesses within the Arrow Business Park occur on weekdays from 8 :00 a.m. to 5 :00 p.m. with the exception of two. The restaurant located at 9047 Arrow Re ,,p #190 will be open from 9:00 a.m. to 6 :00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. Also, the li alth Studio located at 9057 Arrow Route #150 and #160 (approved per CUP 88 -04) holds Karate Classes weekday PLANNING coMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 89 -02 - WORD OF LIFE March 8, 1989 Page 3 nights and Saturdays and offices are open from 10:00 a.m, to 9:30 p.m. weekdays and 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays. Due to this, no conflicts are foreseen with required parking for church and other uses since the church operates primarily during off peak hours of other occupants. The Foothill Fire District will require Conant improvement plans to be submitted to the District prior to occupancy. C. Environmental Assessment: Upon review of Part 1 of the n a 55-Fly an completion of Part 2 of the Environmental Checklist, staff has found no significant impacts related to a church locating within this industrial center. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Commission must tike all the following findings in order td.approve this application: 1. The proposed use is in accordance with the General Plan, and the objectives of the Developspnt Code, and the purposes of the Industrial Specific Plan Subarea in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan. IV. CORRESPCNDENCE: This item has been advertised a. a public hearinj in the a y e o ?t newspaper, the property posted, and notie .3 sent to a acen property owners within 300 Meet of the project. Y. RECOMMENDATION: If °w Planning CoirAission can support the tin dings, ner aprroval of the Conritional Use Permit 89 -02 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval would be appropriate. If the Planning mission cannot support the necessary findings, then stay .nould be directed to prepare a Resolution of Denial for adoption at your next meeting. Res lly s d 8 B r City nner BB:SNtmig PLANNrW cOWIS5I0N STAFF REPORT CUP 89 »02 WORD OF LIFE Marsh 8, 1989 Page 4 Attachments: Ex" bit °A" - Site plan Exhibit letter from A licant Exhibit "c" .. Floor Plan pp Exhibit "D" " parking Calculations Resolution of Approval El 11 1 ARROW ROIITE IS vlAj:ja 4 I art. f F H THat I^w, ' Ave. r ITEM CVP 24-Oa TM 5'��Fa dart NIRM -1 - SC A Z.R! MFMNINE OFFICE SPACE MEMENGER INVESTMENTC0MAAWY February 8, 2,989 Mrs. Beverly Nissan. City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 9320 -C Baseline Rd. P.O. Box 307 Ra,chc Cucamonga, California 91730 R5: ARROW BUSINESS PARR Dear Beverly: Attached please find a Conditional Use Permit Application ior a tenant who would like to locate within the Arrow Business Park. Ws wish to allaw Randy Allred, Pastor of Word Of Lila church to locate : i;at busines:t within Building 2 of our project. Under the couditionally permitted uses for Sub "ea 3, this would fall under the category of Religious Assembly. The tenant would like to lease approximately 3,000 square feet within our project. I have attached a tenant improvement plan, for your reference. The hours of operation for Word of Life church will be as follows: Monday through Friday: Evenings only Sunday: Morning Services Randy has chc6GZ to locate in our project for a number of reasons. Primarily, our lfncation offers him close proximity to many of his members in Rancho Cucamonga. Secon3ly, the aeca,8s affordod by vineyard and Arrow Route are also necessary to his business. 17512 Von Kennon AvenLe, [Mm, CA 42714 tr-ATy OF k" , %ANNING G - / 7141474 -1300 _ ' f l-'Vi le 7141474 -6411 YTZM-. U�P� S9 -,Da 2 I have included the following items with this request, for the Conditional Use Permit checklist. I. Unii'orm Application 2. Part I of the Initial Study 3. Four (4) 8 1/2" x 11" site plane: and tour (4) S 1 /2'f x 11" tenant improvement floor plans. 4. This letter 5. Five (5) satss of gummed labels for ratification of applicants 6. Three (3) sets of gummed labt2s for public hearing notification 7. A check in the amount of 1465. 00 to cover the filing fees for both the condsnibnal. Use Permit and the Initial Study. Your assistance in prccessing this Conditional Una Permit Application is greatly appreciated. Should you have any questions or comments regarding this agplicaticn please teed free to contact me directly. Co sally 1 : - . A �-- J hn S. Aschieris Director Acquisitions and Marketing cc: Ran"y Allred JZA /bb � OF ITEM.. Cup Sg -oaR NTN G DIVISION _ 9-7 vv utaiew. ,.r" Dear Steve: February 28, 1989 This is to inform the planning commission cf approximate use of lease tacilir.ies: Suaday - 9, aim. - 12 noon and 6 - 8 p.m. Tednesdays - 7 - a p.m, (General assembly deet'�>ngs e* 11 be during these times only.) Secretary Hours - 8 a.m. - 5 i .m. 1S -P (Maximum of 2 - 3 people) Curre,.►F 4rmmW,-wS, clo rrk . fvb,jewa 620wTk ""a Wo FCAt IF- RANCHO Crff OF GAMONGIA PLANNIN1 DIVISION g4 Sincerely Yours, po't - , V�" . Pastor Randy Alward (lord of Life) ITEM —c, fl 89.02 TITLE: ,— •4� j4,d- EXHIBIT-t . •`.. SCALE -' rl D ' PROPOSED BUILD -OUT A r • 6 ��ICfi ra'-C G�irT1t1Q � -- No-r To Se^LcL 1 �Dist'�iC �r tNt�T N�: Q dfibC 7IIANFriL ®@Y��t PDX BCEZ190CUCAAffAl%KCAM= OF ITEM JANCHO CUC",.ONiGA nTLz.. - L-1-or N N a � d C A r • 6 ��ICfi ra'-C G�irT1t1Q � -- No-r To Se^LcL 1 �Dist'�iC �r tNt�T N�: Q dfibC 7IIANFriL ®@Y��t PDX BCEZ190CUCAAffAl%KCAM= OF ITEM JANCHO CUC",.ONiGA nTLz.. - L-1-or PARKING CALCULATIONS Type Square Park Ing Paz„ ;aer of Spaces Number of Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Proposed Church Parking Ratio Spaces Required 9047 v ai San:tuary 2,010 1/35 57 10 bj Office 1,050 1/250 4 95+ 1/250 18 9007 Arrow 180 The following is a breakdown of utes and the amount of parking spaces required for each occupant in the building under consideration and adjacent buildings at this tire: 'ITY OF ANCHO CCA N GA :ANNIN E IVIsION 9-/0 El NORTH tia. of Addrecs Suite Use sq. Ft. Parking Ratio Spaces Required 9047 Arrow 190 Ocli /Rest. 1,020 1 /100 10 9007 Arrow 100 6 120 Office 4,420 1/250 18 9007 Arrow 180 Office 500 1/250 2 9037 Arrow 100 Research/ 4,050 L/350 12 Development 9037 Arrow 140 Office 1,800 1/250 7 9037 Arrow 150 Mfg. 1,800 1/500 4 9037 Arrow 170 Mfg. 1,800 1 /EOO 4 9057 Arrow 140 Ftdical Off. 1,920 1/200 10 9057 Arrow 160 & 160 Health 3,840 1/150 26 Studio -° Total 93 'ITY OF ANCHO CCA N GA :ANNIN E IVIsION 9-/0 El NORTH RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89 -02 FOR A CHURCH USE IN A LEASED SPACE OF 3,0Ei SPUARE FEET WITHIN AN EXISTING MULTI- TENANT INDUSTRIAL PARK ON 8.72 ACRES OF LAND IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 3) LOCATED AT 9047 ARROW ROUTE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209- 012 -19 A. Recitals. (i) Word of Life has filed an application fug the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit No. 89 -02 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred tows "the application". iii') On the 8th of March, 1909, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (1ti) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced p,.blic hearing on March 8, 1989, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 9047 Arrow Route with a street frontage of 770.63 feet and lot depth of 622 feet and is presently improved with 7 industrial buildings and 379 parking spaces; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is an apartment complex and park, the property to the south consists of industrial buildings, the property to the east is industrial, and the property to the west is industrial. (c) The proposc-d church will operate from 8:00 a.m. to 6 :00 p.m. on weekdays, except National holidays, from 7:00 p.m. to 9 :00 p.m.. on i/ ► Wednesdays, and from 9 :00 a.m. to 12 noon and 6:00 p.m. to 8 :00 p.m. on t. Sundays. 6 -1i P'k.ANNIMG ComrSSION RESOLUTION N0. CWP 89 -02 - WORD OF LIFE March 8, 1989 Page 2 El 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented t�+ this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the. objectives of the Industrial Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together tiith the conditions applicable thereto, will net be welfare, or mat t ial Public Co properties or imprciements 'in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use ccmplies with each of the applicable Peavisions of the Industrial Specific Plan. been 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has Quality�Acteof 970 and, further, thisnCc�issionchereby issues nyarNegative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set '.--r-+h below. 1. Approval of this request shall not wive compliance with all sections of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, and all other City Ordir,dnces. _ 2• If Vd operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or operations, including, but not limited to noir, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for the consideration and possible termination of the use. 3. Occupancy of the facility shall not cemence until such time as all Uniform Building Code AWState Fire Marshall's regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Foothill fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance Prior to occupancy. 4. Any signs proposed for the facility shall be designed in conformance with the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance, any Uniform Sign Program for the complex, and shall require` 6-12— PLANNIN ,"ISSION RESOLUTION No. CUP 89 -02 — WORD OF LIFE March 8, 1989 Page 3 I review and approval bI the Planning Division. ta- installation. . 5. Operating hours for public assembly shall de limited to the wrek;�nd and after 6:00 p.m. Monday tnrough Friday, except on National holidays, 6. There shall be no weekday activity except for chwrch office uses and other- activities which will not exceed the available parking. 6, The Secretary tc this COmr,ssion shall certify to the adoption of thi4 Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JMARCK, 1989, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. WENiel; C na rman ATTEST: ra u er, cre ary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the Ci *,Y of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the Sth dart of March, 1989, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMOSSIONERS: /3-/3 PLAN CHECK REPORT March 3, 1989 Word of Life Church 9047 Arrow Route, #180 & 190 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 I. Common wall shared with deli to the northwest, Call out the fire rating of this watt. 2. Cali out fire rating of the common wall to the east. 3. What is the occupancy to the east? If it is vacant, a written agreement with the property owner will be requirzd to prevent ine- rupatible occupancy moving into this space. 4. We cannot accept the maximum capacity of 130, as shown on ....he plan:. We will need to establish the occupy icy classification prior to any further plan checking. 5. This report does not include review of the exits, nonstruction of an exit corridor, if required, emergency lighting, interior finish, exit signs, fire alarm system, if required, and occupancy separations, if required. 6. It is not recommended at this time to approve this CUP without a complete fire and life safety plan review. 7. Plan check fees will be required. 8. Fire department permit to conduct a place or public assembly is required priov to occupancy. Susan D. Wolfe, plan Rev' wer SDW,ss i C 2 RA CITY RANCHO CUCAMONCA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 8, 1989 TO: Chairman and Ftmbers of the Planning Commission FROM: Brerd Buller, City Runner BY: Cindy Norris, Assistant Planner CINWO-N, ¢' 9 a r a �n yO O F- 2 U 1977 SUBJECT: ENVIRONDfiWAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ANENDMER RAT- CRl'EK`, - A request to amen ,e eve opmeenMs r c p t ram Flood Control (FC) to Madim Density Residential (M) (8 -14 dwelling units per acre), which encompasses 7..61 acres of land located on the west side of Carnelian Avenue, approximately 1,000 feet south of Calle Del Pradd - AP4: 207- 022 -64. I. PROJECT APwD SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a Development District 7VWn-&—en-t from Flood Control to Medium Density Residential. 8. Surrounding Laud Use and Zoning, North "-;�—Exi`sti ng`- singl email- (proposed multi - family Tentative Tract 14268I; Medium Density Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre). South Vacant; Flood Control East Existing single family; Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre). West - Flood Control Channel and existing single family; Flood Control and Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre). C. General Plan Designations: Project. Site - Medium Density Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per a *.re) North - Medium Density Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per ac: e) South - Flood Control East - Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre wit3: a floating park designation). West - Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) O. Site Characteristics The subject site is vacant with the exception of a lan seeped parkway of Eucalyptus trees aad ITEM C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ODA 87 -12 - BURGUNDY CREEK, LTD. March 8, 1989 Page 2 shrubs directly adjacent to the existing curb and Flood Control Channel along Carnelian Ave,:,e. E. Surrounding Land Use: Directly north are three (3) existing older s r91e"_fami3y ho :es which are to be removed as part of the proposed development for Tentative Tract 14263. North of this is an existing water tank and approximately four (4) single family homes. The area north of these homes has been developed with multi - family units. East of Carnelian are existing single family homes which rear onto the subject site, while to the west are existing single family homes separated from ,the subject property by the San Bernardino County Flood Control Channel, (appraxim& tely 150 -200 feet), (Exhibit "C "). 11. ANALYSIS: The requested amendment proposes a change in the District— Designation from Flood Control to Medium Residential. The Cucamonga County Water District ha^ C,.:clared the subject property to be surplus because Cucamonga Creek Channel .aprovements eliminated flood hazard. In addition, the property has contiguous parcels to the north which are zoned Medium Density Re =,dential and is separated from existing lower density areas to the east by secondary arterial (Carnelian Avenue) and to the west by8 ")th: San Bernardino County Flood Control Channel. (Exhibit The General Plan has been interpreted to include the subject parcel as a logical extension of the Medium Density Residential Designation. Therefore, change in the Development District Designation from Flood Control to Medium Density would bring the zoning into conformance with the General Plan as required by State law. In addition to this Development District Amendment request, the applicant is currently processing a total residential development design review application, using optional standards under Medium Density Residential, from approximately 42 condominium units (Tentative Tract 14263) which encompasses the subject parcel and the one directly to the north. Attached is a Conceptual Site Plan illustrating the potential site development (Exhibit "D"). I1I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Parts t and 11 of the Environmental cbecklist nave men completed. Staff has determined that no significant environmental impacts will be created as a result of the proposed amendment. It is anticipated that any issue of acoustical impacts will be successfully mitigated at the project level. An acoustical report has been pr-oared which recommends sound barrier attenuation for exterior patios and recreational areas. An arborist's report shall be prepared in conjunction with Cf- Z- PLANNING COWISST AI STAFF REPORT DDA 87 -12 BURP iWDY CREEK, LTD. March 8, 1989 Page 3 Wo the project development to determine whather existing trees may be preserved. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Should the Commission, upon examination of Me eve opmen strict Amendment, deci-ie the changes would promote the Land use goals and purposes of the General. Plan, that it would not be detrimental to the adjacent properties or cause significant adverse environmental impacts atC listed under the Environmental .Assessment, the folViwing findings are necessary for approval: 1, The the subject property is suitable for the uses Permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size,, and compatibility with existing hand use in the surrounding area;. and 2. That the proposed district change would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrwnding properties, and 3. Thet the proposed district cha os is in conformance with the is General Plan. V. CORRESPOWENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing In the Ny eport newpaper, the property posted, and notices sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. VI. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recomiends that the Planning C"Anission adopt e a ac ed Resolution motmending approval of Develor,nent District Amen&ent °7 -12 to the City Council dnd issue a Hecative DeclarAtion, thereby designating the project' site as Meditm Density Residential. Res lly to Bra r City P nner BEr;CN :�Ig Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Applicant Letter Exhibit "6" - Surrounding Zoning Designation flap Exhibit "CO - Site Utilization lap Exhibit "D" Proposed w .zte Plan (TT 14263) Resolution of Approval C -3 C -rY P, v cl:'D Cindy Nov.ls Planning Departmer-t City a!! Rancho Cucazoncra, Ca. Res nevelopment Districts Amendment 87-12 Reasons for zone change on parcel no. 267-022-64 are as follows; - To conftem with adjoining parcel to the north no. 207-022-54 Jhi.ch we aluo own. - TC confc%rin- with th5 ci+..,y,s fftagter p:t! - To have both parcels with zoning of Medit4m Rasidmntial 8 -14 DU/AC for nevelopmen'-'Reveiw Project 88-12 Thank You, Stan Scates and Bil,t &.=, Burgundy Creek A W Original P ®QC Quality 2r eiAWF Ave. \ ;\ 1 v Ta—,d. ?csi cleni ij T G`1afie.° J'riood LP Turf= Q: v Conical �Z. ;�'•'� l{ �i}'� �\ t � � C' Low Residential 2-4 MIX SUBJECT �iv�y„ single Fa\nil��- � PROPER' �Y <- ltlt O ar+e:�rrM a: user ° VACAM — f \ p 22 a � asaao to;rr> \ \ FC r ally Res. Law Resideniial is 5ttiao{ 2 -4 DU/AC Fr- NORTH ITEMO PLANNING DIVISION .. ) 41 t m// v 1 f J� vnat po ®r Qu, Q [l I_ / is it f r� T•Y V� i i CITY OF ITEM: f RAC 'CaUCAMO GA TITLE:_, PLANNING DIVISION 0,—o � HIBIT: SCALE; ., Original Poor Qjality 77 % j Zi tit , fz is lt:r � ++OlRt—H JITY OF ITEM: $. RANCIMV CUCAMONGA (7r),IZ&3 P. LANNING DIVISION 7 SCALE: RESOLUTION NO. F A RE-SOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCi`ANGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMFv r. DISTRICT AMENDMENT 87 -12, REfU.ESTIfiG TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP FROM FLOOD CONTROL, TO MEDIUM DE4SITY RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE; '7% 1.61 ACRES OF LAND L=TED ON THE WESt SIDE OF CARPtLIAN AVENUE. APPROXIMATELY 1,000 FEET SOUTH OF CAL E DEL PRADO, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THE!;ac - APR: 207 -= -64. A. Recitals. hz Stan ScatesiBill Mitt have filed an application for Developmnt District Amendment No, 87 -12 as described in ke title of this Resolution, Hereinafter in this Resoluti4n, the .4ubject Development District Amendment is rt- ferrad to as "the ap1Mcai;ion ". (ii) On March_8, 1089, the Planning Coimtirsion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly rn iced public hearing on toe application. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. C, te:olutian. NOW, THEREFORE, it is here'W -y fotand, determined and resolved by the Plop"ins Commission cf the City of Rancho Cuca&)nga es follows - 1. This zomission hereby specific0ly finds that all of the facts set forth in Recitals, Part "A", of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidQnce presented to t'i1s Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on Makh 8, 1989, includfno writt:n and oral staff reports, together with public tes:...,ony, thi3 Commi -:pion hereby specifically*inds as follows, (a) no application appl «es to approxiteately 1.61 acres of land, fr. basically a triangular configuration, locratcd west "� Carnelian Avenue and_.approximaUly 1,000 feet south of Calle D6 Prado and is presently undeveloped. Said property is currently designated as Flood Control-, and 1b) The property to +lie north of the subject site is designated Medium Density At)sideptlal (8 -14 dwellkng units per acre) ind is ^ -dent y developed with three existing older single family hones. `the property to the vest is designated flood Control and is an improved channel. The property to tie east is designated Lta,. Density Residential (2-4 dwelling C ~ F PLANNING COMMISSION 05SOLUTIOU DOA 87 -12 - BURGUNDY CREEK, LTD. March 8, 1989 Page 2 11 units per acre) and 'S developed with existing single family homes. The property to the south is designated Flood Control and has an improved Flood Control Cl;annel. (c) Tne requested dist *ict change will, allow a logical continuation of the Medium Density Designation to the subject parcel= wnich is the last si_iificantly developable piece of land in the area bounded by the Flood Control Channel and Carnelian Av *nue; and (d) The district change will not be detrimental to adjacent lowar density properties to the east and west, zs it is separated from these properties by the Flood Control Channel and Carnelian Avenue; and (e) The change in designation will allow the irregularly shaped piece of land with access constraints to be deveicpad in conjunction with the adjacent r.orthe °ly parcel. and (f) A detailed acoustical. analysis and arborists reper. will be required with a propose~ pruj'Za �!n this site which shall be consistent wit„o City Ordinances, Standards and policies. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Coakission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon specific findings of facts set forth in pirag+raphs 1 and 2 above, this C' ::ion hereby fins and concludes as f0 lows: ia) Uat the .subject property is suitable for the uses perm;tted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the sur- ounding area; and (b) That the proposed amendment would ncrt have significant impacts on the onvironmen'c'L nor the survounding properties; and Genf;ro.l Plan. (G) That thi prs;t -sed amendment is in conformance with the 4„ Th's Comission hereby *_t!- that the project has been reviewed and coresidtmd in compliance ait;% the California Environmental Quality Act o 1970 and, feather, this "immission hereby recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. 5 Based upo±r the findings an con0 usions rxt ?orth In paragraphs 1, 2, 3, ...e 4 abg1vP, this Cmissittn her:;ay resolves ahat pursuant to Section 65850 to oS855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission cf the Citl' U rrr-rl t rnar€anga hereby raecomends approval on the 8th 4ay of March, 1X6, District Mendment ft. 87 -12„ a. Tr. this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. C — q PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION DOA 87 -12 - BURGUNDY Cire(, LTD. Maras 8, 1989 obPage S t� APPROJVED AND AWTED THIS 8TH DAY OF MARL-1, 1989. PLANKK COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCW.ONGA BY: carry ATTE"T: —Brad u1 i er,— Mre?ary I, Brad Buller, Secretar,/ of the Planning Com- lsulun of t..3 City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby r-;rtify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regular,y otroduced, paled, and adopted by the Planning Comis;sion of the City o" Rancho CucamorSa, a reguIv meeting; of the Planning Co; ission held on thE: 8th day of March, 1989, by the following vote -to -.tit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMISS1ONERS: ABSEKT: COMMISSIONERS 'n' I /0 E] 11 f. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: lurch 8, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner, 1977 SUBJECT: VARIAMCE 89 -02 - KIWES7 - A request to allow three (3) w`af'ersigns to excee a maximum height limit of twenty (20) feet within an existing commercial center, located at the southeast corner of Footdll Bouievard and Hellman Avenue - APR: 208-261-25 and 26. 1. BACKGROUND* On February 3, 1988, the 'City Council approved the develop se`rtf of an integrated shopping center consisting of fov_ retail buildings totaling 87,581 square feet in area. Following the approval of the application, the applicant began preparing a, uniform sign program for the shopping center (Foothill Village) to fulfill a conditioq of approval for the development. During the ceu-se of review of the uniform sign program, staff noted that Nall signs p,-oposed for ReteAl A, Retail 8 and Retail C exceeded the maximum height lirft 0? 20 feet (from finished grade to top of sign) established by they Sign Ordinance. As a result, the applicant is now sutet -tting a variance application to allow these three signs to exceod -he 20 fnot height limit. II. ANALYSIS: As part of V>e review of tie elevations, the applicant was required to show conceptual sign locations and sizes for the various stores, tsee Exhibit C). Generally, the sign areas are based on the design of the building and titi amount of space leased by an individual 'anant. With this particular deveiori ent, possible sign locations included the- tmier elements, the facia area belo" the roof' line, and on "fie parapet. While the locations are concept;:ul only ft locatlon., serve as a guide io the developer In the preparation of the final plans for the uniform sign program. Retail Buildings A, B. P4 d C are major tenants of 10,000 square feet or greater. These units will typically have larger signs setting them apart from the rerminder of 1,)e tenant's within the center. Considering the design of the particular units, the appropriate location for the signs is on the parapet. The bu <idior. are designed wi #.h the parapet serving as a siy:?age band. The locations will allow for major tenant identification propnrtinnate wits, the scale of the buildings, The sign locations will alga complement the intended design of the building. T-J 1) PLANNING COMMI SIGN STAFF REPORT VARMCE 89002.,- NUUEST MARCH 8, 1984 Page 2 As with any sign, there ij always concern with the design and color of the signs proposed Within c project.,'; Because a uniforn sign prograr. was required to be submitted'as a Condition of Approval, the City has full review and appnaval of the type of sign, color, lettering, and materials of the sign. Presently, staff is prep ?ring comments on the uniform sign program for presentation. to the Design Review Com?nittee on ,March 38, 3989. Iii. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order f r the PTWn fng Cotrmission to approve the Variance, facts to support the folltosing findings must be made; 1. That the strict or literal interpretation of enforcement of the specified regulation Wald result in practical difficulty or unnecessary„ physical ��ardship Inconsi tent with tho. objectives of the Development rode. 2. That there are exceptional ce extraordinary cire;anstatices or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the iptended use of ^;ate property tnat do not generally apply to other properties in the some district. 3. 'That strict or litera7l interpretation of the spe °ifiod regulations would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by owners of other properties in the sane district. 4. That the granting of the Variance will ►lot 0nstitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent wifl the limitations of other properties classified in the same die(rict. 5. That the g- ant$ng of the Variance will not be de¢rimental to the health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious :o properties or improvements in the vicinity. IV,. CORRESPONDSICE: This item has b:,Qn advertised in the Daily iaeport newspaper i—as a Public Hearing, the property posted,—a-0 na cos seat to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VARIANCE 89 -02 NUWEST MARCH 8, 1989' Page 3 V. RECOMMENDATI0N: Staff recortymnds that the Planning Commission approve ariance 89421 through adoptien of the attached Resolution. Resp lly sub: ad, ra air er�� �Ci'v Plann¢r 88 :SM :js AttachA�nts: Exhibit ",A" - Site Flan ExhilNit "'R" - Building Elevations Exhibit "C" Conceptual Elevations Resolution of Approval r r. 111"UmaN= v1= ft�----mj tl O lit" ri 'ansmAy WAMM MY Or. rrF,%Ii VIT IRANCM CUCA,"AUNGA Tn-LF. PLANNING DIVSrk,+4 EXHIBIT' 4 SCAL.- - P-q I*] L Original Poor Quality 1 vuo o w.r C A • SPY A Y CiNw e:r.m a s b x ..2 mmm.- rvo o�iN L,i�m L - U, a Z Q N ■.o� C a►ai` > °s i f I f ry i ( I 'L ( ( I tt a e t 0 ry PLANNM DMWN EXHIBIT. e-/—SCALE,— Original Poor Quafih yob F��(( M � Mil i1 Y r�L y M a• NMMr y &Z� Y a Md N a s� CITY C RAINUiO CUCAMONGA MANNING D(Vi&aN D -� EXHIBIT -49:9— SCALE, E1 7 r fiond, 1100, Quavlty q s7 i •YO u a.a b G r+ C R N Y eE t Q 7 a�7 N �N NS X� ,IBF N Y a L-�Y a C 7MRr N 't .�.. V k :e�ff� M vi (: its: Z W Ai oe oa z > x D ms roy�s r r I i t I w � N ; S i i 1 I L,_J f Crf Y OF RAM °ZAMONCA € PLANNING DIVA s b N Tr Lt _ MIMI i� �►VaE -- t�,�f �- 0�� TrrU -. Gp EXHIBIT- —�.. SCALD 4ifwt I A 4 \����17, IN ' X1 Zia uy .:ate r 4 �i !ii i ' RESOLUT0*, Mr. A REFOLUTION OF THE RM'ChO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING VARIANCE NO. d9 -02 TO ALLOW THREE (3) ',BALL SIGNS TO J(CEED THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT LIMIT OF TWENTY (20) FEET WITHIN AN EXISTIfa GoNuRCIAL CENTER LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVA90 AND HELLMAN AVENUE - APN: 208- 261 -25 AND 26. A. Recitals. (i) NuVasb has filed an application for the issuance of the Variance .No. 89 -02 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the app?'ication ". (ii) on March 3, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that da! *. (iii; All legal prerequisites to th.2 adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Panning Cmission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga es f0 lows: 1. Thin Commission hereby $peg 'fically finds i�iat all of the facts set forge in tho Recitals, Part A, of t' a Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence rresented to this Comaisslen during the aijoie- reforenced public hearirg on March 8, 1989, including written and oral staff repcts, together wit) public testimony, this Cormission hereby specifically firms as follows: (a% The application applies to property located at c:he south =ast corT)r f Foothill Boulevcrd and Hellman with a street frontage of 673 feet am,:� t depth of 600 feet along Helms Averuo. The site is presently being developed with a commercial center. <b) The properly to the north of the si 4Sjet3 site is within the Foothil'� Specific Plan, Nixed Use District, and is cu,`,=ently de %elsped with a eosbft "tion of a motel, mobile home park, vacant land and single family hoses. The property to the south of that site is withIri .he Low Residential District and is currently developed with single family homes, The property to the east of the subject site is located within t t Foothi i Specific Plan, Community C9n2rcial District, and is developer. with various comerciO /retail buildinns. The prgerty to the hest of the subject site is within the Tedium- High Ras dential District and Low Residential district and is developed with a. combinatiar of apartments and single fancily homes; D -1 f 071 -Q2 03_8-8 PC Agenda o of 3 PLANNING WWSSIOH RESOLUTION NO. VARIANCE 89.02 - NUWESf MARCH 8, 1989 Page 2 (c) The location of the wall signs will provide for the identification of the major tenants that is proportione.te with the scale of the building and is an integrated part of the building design. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That, strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficllty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. (b) That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property dnvolved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same distric . (c) That strict or literal Isite,,pretation and enforcemxnt of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of pr' Aetf4 i enjoyed by the owners of other properties io fa district. (d) That the granting of tFire lariance will not constitute a grant of special privilage inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. (e) That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. dased upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approved the application. S. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. 11 Ah PLARNIMS CMWISSIgN RE VARIANCE 89 -02 - H SOLUTION no. BJ RE �tCH 8, 1989 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED 1HIS 8TH DAY OF MARCH 1989. P -LANN ?Na COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: a man ATTEST: ra u er, rcre rY I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning CoNjission of the City of Cucaatonga, do hereby ce•tify that the foregoing Resolution gas ncho regular ",y introduced,. passed, and adopted b my Ra theCity of ctancho Cucamanoa, at a regular meeting of the Planni�,g Comisston held the 8th day of march 1989,; .Y the fallo #in ate -to- it: Cnrapission of the 9 to -wit: AYE'S. COMMISSIONERS: HOU., COMMISSIONERS: ABSENTe COMMISSIONERS -13 A A yj vlt J W` ibc�j".WA2V.SJV Ld31CL17 V41 STAS 11." REPORT DATE: March 9, 1989 TO: Chairman and umbers of the planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Chris Westman, Assistant Planner n 0 0 F z U1 > 1977 SUBJECT: MOCIFICATION'TO THE VIRGINIA DARE PARKING STUDY -A review of modificatlons to the shared par _ ng concept and projected parking demand for the Virginia bare Center. I. ABSTRACT: This report is being presented to the Planning o�iss%`n to evaluate the outcome of 'a modified parking study fsr the Virginia Dare Business Center. The study has been prepared as a result of a proposal to incr -,e office square footage from 57,000 square feet to 53,597 squa, feet. II. BACKGROUND: The previous parking study, was accepted as adequate and comp e e by the Commission on August 10, 1988. The following suranarizes the Commission's acticr, on that study: 1) Matinees shall be eliminated on non - holiday weekdays. 2) A total of 727 spaces will be required (661 plus ten percent buffer) based upon the three -story and one -story scheme with 57,000 square feet of office. 3) A ten percent buffer will be required over the Austin -Foust projected peak parking demand to provide some opportunity for vehicles to find an empty space when arriving during parking peak hours. 4) Exp&,sion of the office square footage above 57,000 square feet will require revision to the parking study to analyze the impact of the inc:nase and to determine a new peak parking demand. The three-story and one -story scheme which was favorably received by the Commission, has been retained in the current proposal; however, the total square footage For the office area has increased to 63,597 square feet aad now includes partial underground parking. ITEM E PLANNING COh441SSION STAFF Rk.ORT MODIFICATION TO ':IRGINIA 3AR6 PARKING STUDY March 9, 1989 Page 2 III. ANALYSIS: a. Completeness The City's consijitant, Austin- Foust, used the same data and formulas for detemining peak parking demand as in the August !% study with the exception of using 63,597 square feet for proposed office space versus 57,400 square feet. b. Peak Demands Using the sane peak hours as in the previous report, but with the adjusted numbers; a maximum projected demand of 908 parking spaces is needed W th matinees and 688 without matinees. With the inclusion of J)e ten percent buffer recomamendild by the Engineering Division in the previous report, projected demmnd wouIC be S99 spaces with matine��� and 757 parking spaces without matinees. The consultant recommends 925 spaces as being adecaate with matinees. The current proposal submitted by Tower Partners proposes a total of 727 parking spaces, 30 spaces deficient of peak demand without matinees plus the ten percent buffer (757). The proposed 727 parking 'spaces would project slightly less than six percent buffer. The study indicates evening movies beginning at 5:00 p.m. viith a parking demand of 301 spaces. It is projected that 144 spaces would to vacated at the sane msr by office workers. These figures would indicate a potential of 445 cars maneuvering throe -h the site at approximately the $av's time. (See Table 51. Therefore, a transitional period should be considered betreen daytime uses and evening uses. IV. SUMMARY: As in the previous parking study, it has been concluded t5at re is a strong possibility for a shared parkin arrangement. lire current study estimates that 925 parking spaces for the overoill proposed project would be sufficient, without eliminating the vr�.tineu and 688 with elimination of the matinee. Based on previous Engineering Division recommendations, a ten to twenty percent buffer over the maximum parking demand should be provided for the opportunity for vehicles to find an empty space when arriving at the parking peak. Assuming a ten percent buffer, this would bring the acceptable parking count up to 999 with matinees and 767 without matinees. 6 -Z L 11 PLANNING COWW",SION STAFF REPORT MODIFICATION Tf VIRGINIA DARE PARKING STUDY March !', 1989 Page 3 V. RECOMMENDATVIN: It is recommended that the Planning Commission accept a pa sing study as adequate and completeM Further, staff recommends, based on the current proposal, that the amount of parking provided should he consistent with the projected need as shown in &- study plus a ten percent buffer. Resp 1t•, 5 ted Bra d.B er City tanner BB :CW:js Attachment: Modified Parking rkady ` Minutes of August W, 3988 Panning Comission Meeting I�:J IUSTIN -d ASSOCIASSOCIATF-S. INC. TRAFFIC ENGINEE9IN.G AND TRANSPORTATION PLANNING 1450 NORTH TUSTIN AVENUE, SUITE 108 • SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 • TELEPHONE (714) 6670496 FAX (714) 667.7952 February, 8 1989 City of Ranch Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ATTENTION. Mr. Dan Coleman SUBJECT: Virginia Dare Parking Study Dear Mr. Coleman: CM Of PANLHO GU�R4i0NtIP pwiliiNG OM111914 FEB 101989 PM It_1%1ltl12i1A34150 Austin -Foust Associates, Inc. (AFA) conduced a study of Virginia Dare Place in order to determine the existing and future parking needs of that facility. The study included an analysis of the existing parking demand at Virginia Dare, the projected demand based on proposed land uses for the site, a Aetailed summary of parking demand for the various land uses, a comparison with similar mixed use centers, and a possible shared parking arrangement. Figure 1 indicates the project location, while Figure 2 illustrates the project site plan. Parking counts were conducted at Virginia Dare Place from 12 :00 Noon to 9:00 PM on Friday May 13, Saturday May 14, and Saturday May 21. Parking counts were also conducted from 11 :00 AM to 3:00 PM on Sunday May 15. Table 1 presents a summary of the half hourly counts including the average and owax1-ums for each time period. Figure 3 illustrates the variation in parking accumulation by time and date, while Figure 4 illustrates the hourly variation is the average and maximum parking demands for the project site. When determining the amount of parking required for a mixed -use project, certain information is helpful. The types of information most important for determmining parking demand are: size of the land uses, types of land use, hourly variations in parking demand (for the land use types in question), and seasonal variations in parking demand (for the types of land use in question). The project currently contains office, retail, sit -down restaurant, fast food and cinema uses. Proposed plans call for increasing the amount of office, retail and sit- down restaurant space. Table 2 presents a summary of the existing and proposed land uses as well as the amount of required parking for each use, based on the City of Rancho Cucamonga parking ordinance. The following analysis examines the impact of these additions as well as the estimated shared parking savings for the project. To assess the parking experience of other similar mixed -use projects Urban Land Institute (Shared Parking, 1983) and American Planning Association (FleFible Parking Requirements, T. Smith„ 1983) data was used. These studies have determined the a,eak parking hours and requirements for various land uses. Table 3 presents a summary of parking demand levels by time of day, for several land uses. As this table indicates, different land uses have peak parking demands at different times of the day or week. Table 4 presents a similar analysis for the land uses which are part of the subject project. These tables allow for r� estimating the number of parking spaces needed at different times of the day for weekdays and Saturday.. Figures 5 and 6 graphically illustrate the variations in parking demand by type ,if land use, for weekd vs and saturdays. The above info -oration provides the basis for assessing the impact, on parking demand, of combinations of land uses. It is apparent, by examining Figures 5 and 6, that certain uses can be combined so that a savings in parking can be obtained. Using the City of Rancho Cucamonga parking ordinance and Table 4, the estimated number of parking spaces required for the project can be calculated for each hour of a weekday or Saturday. Table 5 presents such an analysis for a weekday, with and without a cinema matinee, As this table indicates, the total number of parking spack 4 required would be 908 at 2:00 PM with matinee. and 688 spaces at 8:00 PM without matinees. Table 6 presents the same calculations for a Saturday, where the peak demand would be 668 $,,aces at 8:00 PM. Besides hourly variations in parking demand there are also seasonal effects on certain land uses. 'Pablo 7 presents the Monthly variations in parking demand for a number of land uses. This information is important when interpreting the results of ca.°a studies, such as the one performed for Virginia Loire Place. A. the study of Virginia Hare ;lace was conducted in May, some of the land uses were not experiencing there full demand, regardless of the day of week or time of day of the study. To convert the existing demand level to thw maximum seasonal demand, a target month must be chosen. For the land uses of Virginia Bare Place, the month3 of June or July are optimum, as only retail is below 10016 o!P maximum demand. Taking the hourly peak, (5:00 PM Saturday) found in Table 1, the seasonal affect of the parking demand for each type of use can be eliminate I. Table 8 uses the month of June as the target month. By converting the existing parking demand, for each use, to its optimum demand Ievel in June, an overall maximum parking demand lever can be calculated. As shown in this table, the total demand of 274 spaces, calculated in the field study of the project, can be converted to a total of 343 spaces for the higher demand month of June. When this demand level is compared to the number of required spaces (contained in Table 2) the actual demand is only 42.6% of the required amount (343 /$05 ). This would seem to indicate that there is a considerable amount of shared parking savings at the project site, and /or that certain land uses are not experiencing their anticipated parking demand lovels. OMMIM This parking study calculated the existing parking demand, the ordinance requirements, and the shared parking effects of a mixed -use project in Rancho Cucamonga. The number of parking spaces required for existing uses is 759, while the peak parking demand calculated by a field study of the project site indicates a need for only 276 spaces, 343 spaces when seasonal effects an taken into consideration. Proposed changes in the project site, would result in a parking ordinance requirement of 1,153 spaces. A parking demand analysis, based or, hourly variations in parking demand, indicates a need for 588 spaces (if there are no movie matinees) or 908 parking spaces with movie matinees. Based on the field study, of the existing project Iand uses, it is evident that shared parking arrangements are being utilized and that the amount of parking required by the ordinance exceeds the anticipated demand, Given the above results, it is concluded that the proposed project will not require more parking than that provided for in the City of Rancho Cucamonga parking ordinance. The proposed project provides strong possibilities for a shared parking arrangement. Using the results of a field study of the project site and 10 U i available parking demand data, it is estimated that 425 parking spares for the proposed project would be sufficient. I£ you have any questiors regbrding this study, its methodology, or the findings, please call. Respectfully submitted, 7E. us PE JEFJkh I, / L — 6 17 I= Utttitt' V' ti :t.:.:} `.�i 'tit 1 s rJ j t a •' w t � t ass 1 M :;!rtit!i . ,itrit�..idti tJ tJ " ii to t :LJti '!htl trttitit; �Q st I t �4 Figure 2 PROnCT ST` E Pi.'+N Table 1 NUMBER OF PARKED VEHICLE$ BY DATE OF COUNT TIME Fri 5_13`^4 Sat 5-14 5 -15.__ Sat 21__a�maximgm�_ Avera_� 11:40 --- ^Sun '5- ~149 149 149 NOON 180 196 168 249 173 49 196 186 206 170 234 234 199 1;00 190 220 266 240 266 229 200 186 250 260 260 224 2 :00 223 182 153 185 223 186 187 196 158 154 196 174 3:00 ISO 230 163 140 230 178 181 235 230 235 216 00 176 175 239 239 197 165 178 260 260 201 5 .,00 166 276 263 276 235 160 250 241 250 217 6:00 156 155 180 180 164 130 160 185 185 158 7:00 120 163 132 163 138 97 166 141 186 135 8:00 93 112 138 138 114 90 98' 142 142 110 9;00 86 97 146 148 110 AVERAGE 156 183 183 196 20$ 176 MAXIMUM 223 276 266 263 276 23 13 tm i W Q O i. + O Q ,q 2 L O 1 O T N O D W C � D O � G � � as cr.�c ! to cn ci 0 5 NUMBER CP VEHICLES PARKED r ...► r ,.+ r r r — — N - - N N N- N- Os t0 O N W Crt Of V 09 tD O -+ N W � O O O O L- -!l m x N H Z V ro w b �C. c N G7 w t' 1 p � N r � m z a O ci 5 NUMBER CP VEHICLES PARKED r ...► r ,.+ r r r — — N - - N N N- N- Os t0 O N W Crt Of V 09 tD O -+ N W � O O O O L- -!l O O 2 O O Z r 9� x N C O 1 Cd oO O O o y K O + T O O c� m � 0 a V C 7C a '7 M $ H C � La zh y (i M O NUMBER OF VF- HICL,ES PARKED Q -s N Gd f► ' t7t !A V C6 u5 ® r O co O N 4Ni 1 t� Ci V O O O O O G> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Z rn Z G) Ll 0 Table 't ORJiNA.M PARKING RECUIREWNTS U YJ Existing Proposed •.•.Pvktnp R"Ired --..> Use SI "a Sit! (SM {Ronal lPrcooee'!) Office 35.6 TSF 13RAtwik 142 ' Retail 2.5 TSF 2.3 TSF It 11 Restaurant '' SOMA 13.9 TSF 11th Tim Fast Fcad 1.9 TSF 1.9 TV 25 cS Onsets 1,723 Saate 1723 Seats m 759 1153 U YJ in m ? W VI I a $4, re m. a g z a a R 3 1 - V, g N ts ig A A z ;z rt a a M 12 9 9 ie .9 a 8 rs P, Ql ;E v 12 2 19 9 8 Gp. A is 2 w O pn CD M 4 4 li CL CL eL li CL li 'I Table 4 AOL im WEEKDAY PARKING DEHAND (PER TSF OR 10 SEATS) BY LAND USE TIME OFFICE RETAIL RESTRNT FAST FOOD _ -- --- CINEMA -- ---- -6 --------- a- -12- _-------- oa-------- - --- -. - o--- 0.68 NOON 0.60 0.32 0.20 0.27 0.riO 8:00 2.52 0.72 0.10 0.67 0.00 6:00 3.72 1.63 1.1 1 1., 33 0.00 10:00 4,00 2.72 2.00 2.66 0.00 4.10 4.00 3.48 3.00 3.99 0.00 NOON 3.60 ?.88 5.00 6.a5 0.80 3.00 3.60 4.60 7.00 9.31 1.75 2:00 3.88 3.86 6.00 7.98 1.75 2.20 3.72 3.30 6.00 i.9b -.75 4:00 3.08 3.48 5.00 3.z5 1.75 1.a8 3.16 7.00 9.31. 1.75 6:00 0.92 3.28 9.00 11.5' 2.00 0.28 3.56 10.00 13.3, 2.25 8:00 0.28 3.48 10.00 13.36 2.50 0.12 2.44 10.00 13.30 2,.50 10:00 0.12 1.28 9.00 11.97 2.50 I 8 ' NY 'MRRING DEHAND (PER TSF OR 10 SEATS) BY LAND USE TIME OFFICE 6:00 0.00 7:00 0.14 8:00 0.41 9.00 0.54 10;00 0.54 11:00 0.68 NOON 0.68 1:00 0.54 2:00 0.41 3:00 0.27 4:00 0.27 5:00 0.14 6:00 0.14 7:00 0.14 8:00 0.14 9:00 0.00 10:00 0.00 RETAIL VESTRNT FAST FOOD CINEMA ----------------------------------------- 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.20 0.27 0.00 0.40 0.30 0.40 0.00 1.20 0.90 0.80 0.00 1.60 0.80 1.06 0.0c 2.92 1.00 1.33 M o 3.40 3.00 3.99 0.75 3.80 4.50 5.99 1.766 4.10 4.50 5.99 1.75 4.00 4.50 5.99 1.75 3.60 4.50 5.99 1.75, 3.00 6.00 7.98 1.76 2.60 9.00 11.67 2.00 2.40 6.50 12.£4 2.25 2.20 10.00 13.30 2.60 1.60 10,041 13.51) 2.50 1.52 9,50 b2.66 2.50 ��� q b N b +3 � H � m Ln z �e K P. 2; F �D O O O m � o a 0 0 0 0 e °a 0 X o 0 t7 Z 2 i� I NUMBER OF SPACES REQL;InE:D 9 m -o D o Z D z t*! � n 2 C�yy 0% N O K a r zt NUMBER OF SPACES RECUIRED O -� N W �P CJ1 W V OD � O -+ N W .r► OD 1 I 1 1 L 1 L C i 1 1 Q� n O d c 0 a 3 a O .y O x _n G r e7-t6 D a � D D Tehte 5 E-1.7 13 x IL-12 0 WEEVAY PARKING DEMAND (Pit TSF or 10 Seats) @Y LAID USE / j f Time- Officl Ret�,3l Restulrant Fast FQcd ,fare amm u 6:00 14 a 0 0 0 14 96 1 4 1 0 101 9:00 304 2 i 1 0 323 449 5 19 3 0 475 10:00 It 38 5 0 533 Aft 10 5'1 s 0 556 Noon 434 i< 95 13 129 681 434 132 10 301 896 EGO—. r 46P � 4M�1t3 1�" - 30f 449 113 15 701 _. mq.- ,.-._� 4M 371 10 95 13 301 749 227 9 132 RI 301 686 6.00 111 - 9 170 23 344 651 34 10 fa a 337 643 5:00 34 10 tv 686 14 7 665 Maxims 482 11 1819 25 430 "a AjA I'm Office Rett ,[t Res_smrsnt Fast POW G3nwo Sunury 6:00 14 a 0 0 a 14 96 1 4 1 0 101 4:00 304 2 9 1 0 323 449 5 19 3 a 413' 10:00 AM 8 3s $ 0 $33' 10 57 a 0 556 Noon 434 95 13 0 552 434 132 is 0 595 2:00 460 113 15 0 607 f �- 449 113 15 0 585 4:00 371 10 95 is 0 4Z3 227 9 132 18 001 6w -,I. 6:00 111 9 170 23 344 657 _. ,' _ t0 787 645 Z<:C0 34 w 10 i4 7 w w 665 10:00 1�S 4 17rt; A[ fisxisus 482 11 189 25 430 686 E-1.7 13 x IL-12 0 r TAW 6 UTMAY PARk1N0 :9A:.11 (Per 1SF or 14 Seats) Time officc Paul! Sn taursnt Fast FaM Cinams 9trrtiarY _ F 6:00 0 15 - 0 0 0 0 7:00 17 0 4 1 0 22 9 >.00 49 1 6 1 0 5T 9:00 65 •3 11 2 0 81 10:00 S5 5 15 2 0 87 11:00 a 19 3 0 112 Noon 50 37 a 129 285 1:00 65 as 11 301 473 2 :00 49 85 11 301 458 3:00 3$ as 11 301 "2 " 400 33 10 3$ 11 301 440 $00 17 .8 113 1$ • 301 455 6:00 17 7 170 i3 344 562 7 :00 17 7 180 24 387 615 8:00 17 6 _ ins 11 m' " 9:00 _ . 0 4: - -a — tp b 649 AMk to 10:00 0 4 190 24 s 038 karciieus 82 /1 109 25. 430 60 § \� _§ £ §9 K }$■ / /±faasa 3 (#k3 /7 - -- --- \ : §�§ §�2■Gaq£aaa¢ » \� ) }# §f ■ «�sa2 #p#■ \ $aaa2§§esaaa �.§:■a$gq£■#■a . §G■2a�4 «<kaa � ~/ $ 11 11 No" .j Table 8 PEAK PARKING DEMAND CONTROLLED rrLR SEASONAL EFFECTS EXISTING MAY % JUNE % ESI MATED PARKING PARKING PARKING CONVERSION P4}4ING LAND USE -- -- ---------------------- USED USED USED � ----- - FACTOR REgUIRED - - - -- -- -- 100 % - - -- - -------- Y 00 - - -'49 RETAIL 3 70% 75% 1.07 3 RESTAURANT 46 959 100% 1.06 49 I EAST FOOD 8 95% 100% 1.06 8 CINEMA 150 70% 100% 1.43 214 GTE OFFIC 20 100% 100% 1.00 20 TOTAL 276 343 .j ation: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by Blakesley, to adopt the A. oval for by Policies. The motion carried by the fol AYES: COM�lI5SI!ONERS: CHITIEA, BLAKESLEY, EMEnICK NIEL NOES: COW OMM: NONE ABSENT": COt�ISSIONEIZ TOLSTOV -- carried AOL sdt"ution of no vote: K. DESIGN FOR CITY ENTRY NUMENTATIN PRO$ Commission is requested to review an make r omme a ons a City ncil an the proposed rnonumentation pr rah. Otto Kroutil, eputy City Planner, presented staff report. stated he needed the ission "s imput on the selection .;f the ,granite to b sed. He stated, t the recommendation was in the orde , of Ruby Red (Swedis Ruby 'le {I any, and then Ruby Red (Imperial ). TW Commission concurred on the selection of Ruby Red (Swedish) J. VIRGINIA DARE PARKING STUDY (Contir,,%d from July 27, 1988) Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. Commissioner rhitiea questioned if the study takes in the other office retail directly to the east of the cinema. Mr. Coleman stated yes. Commissioner Slakesley asked for clarification on what a matinee is. Mr. Coleman stated that any one of the six screens being opened before 5:30 P.M. weekdays. Chairman MCNIel invited public coament. Larry Wolff, architect with Wolff /Lange /Christophers wvrring on this project, stated that some of the issues they have been work!.,) on is that this is the final chapter and should unify the complex, He stated that the character is extremely important. He stated that the most serious issue they have had to face is parking. He stated that a year ago, they had a parking study prepared which showed approximately a requirement of 700 -725 parking spaces based upon a shared concept recognizing that afternoon matinees during weekdays would have to be prohibited. He stated than, as a result, they initiated the first, design, the six -story building, with the idea to minimize the impact of the Planning Comme;csion Minutes -11• August 10, 1988 E actual building on the available amount of land parking for surface parking. He stated that they were able to achieve 718 parking spaces. He stated that previous to the Commission meeting, he was in receipt of a letter stating that the developers are willing to consider prohibiting weekday matinees in non holiday events as a mitigating measure. He stated that during meetings with the City, it was felt that a six -story building still had a major impact in terms of its overall scale. He stated that at that time they decided to have the City retain a consultant at the developer's expense to do another parking study. When the results were determined, the four -story scheme was created that reflects a project that if the Commission concurs with the parking study, recommendation, assume a 10% contingency and prohibit matinees, could generate a total of 800 parking spuctes, which would be 73 over the recommended 727, but recognizing that the office area would increase from S7,OOO to 78,000 square feet which would adjust parking upward because of the shared concept, which he felt would be covered in the 9110 parking spaces. At this time, Mr. Wolff ref4)rred to his display boards. Fie explained, the basis of parking demands ,and solutions and elevations of the four -story building. Mr. Wolff stated that his client accepts the staff report end recommendations to approve the parking anaj,; is. He stated that in terms vi' the options, his client feels the first would be to ellm3tnati the matinee impact which would make a major reduction in the overall parking required. In terms of the second option, td reduce the size of the office building really has no imp*" on reducing the parking demand. He stated that his client would also like tr'ie opportunity to study the possibility of valet parking. He stated that they have tried to create a visual corridor between the south end of the theater and the new building. NO stated ghat it seems that the four -story scheme could satisfy the amount rt parking, but they have somas concerns with the proposal, such as underground larking. He stated they are tryicag to reach 727 parking spaces without having to utilize underground parking. He stated that was why they created the threw -story schc :v, which could still capture V*z original essence of the project. He stated that with the three -story sch"e, they would be able to 689 parking spaces, with a 38 parking space deficit. One option they have is to construct a sub rranean garage of the 38 spaces under the three -story sshembe. Pe stated that if they left the three -story scheme with a 36 parking space deficit, they would only be reflecting a Z% contingency. David Hichagls, Tower Partners, stated that they are concerned with the parking prob 4*. He stated that they are not after the highest yield, but more in goer With a S0,000 square foot building. He stated that with proper signage and Wat parking her tras not sure that a 10% buffer is needed. 'here w :ere no further public comment. Commissioner Emerick stated he was not in favor of valet parking. Planning Commission Minutes -12- August 10, 1988 Chairman McNiel stated that no matter which building, there is still the issue of surface parking. He stated that the problem is not going to go away. He stated he does like subterranean parking. He stated that he O d not know if limiting the matinees and adding valet parking are the solutions. Commissioner Biakes?ey stated that he prefers the three -story building with subterranean parking. He stated there needs to be definition of matinee if it is going to be eliminated. Commissioner Chitiea concurred witl� Commissioner Slakesley with ttA preference for the three -story building. She stated that larger buildings tire out of scale with the original concept. She stated she was not opposetl to valet parking, but does not see it as a long -term solution. She stated she was in favor of eliminating the matinee. She concurred that the 10% buffer is appropr; ate. Larry Wolff stated that they have been struggling with this for a year. !;e stated that if the four -story scheme is not that objectionable, then there is the v#,Rntial of considering a three -story design which would hover over surface parking. The .;rouble of the three -story is that 'it cannot support the full subterranean parking that the four -story can. He states his preference to eliminating matinees: He stated that based on the C'Ity's Code, the numbers can work. Dan Coleman questioned if the parking study is acceptable and what amount of buffer is needed, if any. Aft The Commission concurred to accept the parking study. wr The Commission concurred to have a 10% buffer. Chairman McNiel expressed his preference to the four -story building with underground parking IN Commissioner CBitiee expressed her preference for the three -story building, Possibly with und"round parking. :he further expressed her concern with underground parking. David Michaels explained the programing of operation for the businesses. He stated he shared Commissiorer Chitiea's concerns for underground parking. The Commission concurred to eliminate matinees and came back for a later review once the nroject is fully built. COWSSIQN BUSINESS There wa no Commmission business at this time. PUBLIC Cdi There were no publi omment,i at this time. Planning Commission Minutes � —Z-3 _13- August 10, 1988 La LL7 il CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Dare DATE. 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT o a F Z i9i7 j DATE: March 8, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Brett Horner, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: MINOR DEYELOPMNT REVIEW 89 -07 A.W. DAYIES - A request to add tio square feet u o ce space o an existing building and warehouse totaling 4,56D square feet on 3.82 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 3) of the Industrial Specific Plan, located on the southeast corner of 9th Street and Helms Avenue - APM: 209- 031 -53 and 54. Minor Development Laview 89 -07 was heard at the February 8, 1989 meeting and was scheduled to return for a public hearing on tonight's agenda. However, this itcr. is being continued t0 the March 22., 1968 meeting in order to complete processing of this application. Resp ly s . tte Br < ' e City P nne B0 :6 :Mlg IT MI F CITY OF RANCHO CTJC",ONGA STAFF REPORT DATE Marc,; 8, 1989 TO. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Otto Xroutll, Deputy City Planner SUBJECT: AN UPDATE 014 CITY COUNCIL GROWTH MANAGM-W WORKSHOP II'Z On Saturday, March 4, the City Council will hold a workshop to discuss issues related to growth. Representatives of the Manning Commission, the Parks and Recreation Commission, the Nblic :�fety Commission, and the Citizens Advisory Commission will also attend. Staff will update the Planning Commission on the workshop discussion. Materials given to the workshop attendees are attached for your information. Resp ly sub eQk" Gilmer 8B.,ko Attachments TTEIA G —r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: WFebru *y 2D, 1;`63T0: and imberS i f the City Council asn fA uller, City Planner At a recent meeting, the City Council briefly discussed the attarad winning Carlsbad Growth Management program. It v2s. felt that additional discussion of growth management issues would be helpful. staft .�! instructed to set up a workshop and to prepare an overview of both tt Carlsbad plan and our own program to allow discussion ,�f growth-reiat-gd issues as they may apply tp Rancho Cucamonga. This packet contains an overview of the Carlsbad plan, a summary of our own growth management process, and a sat of materials outlining the status of several key programs. In addition, there is an appendix containing background and support materials for> mom indepth review. Please rote it is NDT stcff's intention to advocate any position relative to growth management Rather, we hope to review growth management from a broad perspective, and to create a forum for informal discussion. Key staff from City departments involved in the mAnagewnt of growth will be available at the workshop. Representatives ' fro.w the Park and Recreation, Planning, Public Safety, and Citizen's Adviiia y Commissions have also been invited. The dress will be casual apd continental hreakgast will be provided. We look forward to seeing all of your Saturday, Feat ,ch 4, at 8:00 a.m, sharp at the Clarion in Ontario. 88:CK;ke Attache ;ts Lj Nei • GROWTH @NAWAGENEAT WORKSHOP AGjnA SATURDAY MARCH 4, 1989 8:00 A.M. THE 2200 EAST CLARION ILT BOULE YARD ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA I. INTRODUCTION II. CARLSSAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE A brief overview of the Carlsbad plan: What does it do ar4 not do? III. GROWTH MANAGc4ENT IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA An overview of our own growth Managemen, program. Successes and challenges IV. LESSONS LEARN'M V. STATUS OF KEV PROJECTS nun PROGRMS Ladd U;e Traffic and Cir,,�.ula &9,1n Drainage and Flood Control Parks and Rec, ration Financing Alternatives VI. DISCUSSIOf( &--1 INDEX Y. CARLSBAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT ORDINP410E< An OveFyIew 2.. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IN RANCHO CUCAMNGA: An Overview 3. LESSONS LEARNED 4. STATUS tat KEY pROGRA14S City Circulation Planning Circulation Priorities Status Review of 1486 Actls;r Plan Transnortation Planning Nadel Draft 5 -year Capital Projects Program Redevelopment Agency Projects Executive Sumry: parks and Racrerat�on Financing Alternatives I I . * I 91 Jl BACKGR OLNV The Carlsbad Growth Management Plan is a result of a Managed Growth. Initiative developed by the Cit7 of Carlsbad and approved by the voters in November 1936. This initiative wain placed on the ballot in response to another proposition which would have limited growth to a specific number of dwellings each year. The voto*z approved both initiatives; the Managed Growth initiative won out due to a higher number of votes (6$ %). In essence, the Carlsbad 0 70 tb Nfanagement Plan: L Utilizes the General Plan as the basis to limit the maximu�2i number of dwelling units which can be approved or construed in the City; 2. Provides that developmout cannot occur unless "adequate public facilities and services Bidet, or will be provided with now developfneat "; and, 3. Defines the public #arrlitieta send level of services necessary to adequately support fcxttwQt g:%,)wth. C-- -J Tha necessary facilities and improvements ere outliner: in two separate plans: The CITYWlDE ,FACILITIES AND LrAPIIC and projected levels of development, e-ldsting aandffuture facilities, anted establishes ongoing service requirements. It includes epee fic performance standards, er tangible means of measuring levels of aervice, for each of the, following: Parka Library Schools Drainage Open Space Circulation Fire Protection Sever Collection Water Distribution Administrative Facilities Wastewater Treatment Capacity The Citywii a Han also establishes the boundaries of 25 LOCAL FACILITY local MANAGEMENT PLANS. Before any development is approved in any of the 25 Planning areas, a LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT PLA s, must be Prepared. These local plans can be either owner /developer, but muss lbe consistent etpeu sae City, or by the property for local areas which are mostly developed or have dmultiple and ��o plans property ownermNlis are prepared by the City through consultant contracts. Local areas under single or limited ownerships are planned by th3 property owner /developer, and submitted for approval to the City, much in the way our own Planned Communities have been developed. Gr —6 The overall buildout (and the basis for necessary facilities) is based on the General Plan, with adjustments for topography and other constraints. T the growth management progr -, m. does not permit ALL properties t{, develop at the maximum allowed in each density range. Father, a control poir i is established in each density category which effectively limits densities, RZ .fa'sows: ,aalgnavon ----- Density Range Control Point RL 0.1.5 du / ac 1 Diu / ac FILAR '•5 -4 du /ac 3.2 du /ac RM 4 -8 du /ac 6 du /ac RMH 8.15 du / ac 11.5 du / ac RH 15 - 23 du y 19 du 180 To exceed the conirol point density, additional public facilities »suet be provided, and other projt -ka is the same area must have been built at lower density. Plans are as good as the means to implement them, This is Carlsbad Plan appears to leave some una,1awered questions. an area where the The entire concept of 'Growth Map dgement is based on the premise that development can only occur if "ade<.ivate publi4 facilities and service s° Can be provided. To be mteaningfW, it requires a definition of what constitutes adequate sare�se levels, tangible I?EI�FORMANCE STANDARD by which success or failure can be measured. This standard is relatively easy to develop for facilities such as parts; the Carlsbad standard is 3 acres per 1,000 population. When new development is Proposed, it is easily determined whether o not this performance standard will be met, aAd whether the project should be approved or denied, and what necessary (improvements will be needed. -7 Traffic is more difficult to evaluate, the performance standard is "service level D during peak hours ". To determine whether a project will meet or exceed this standard, complex mathematical traffic modeling, sometimes open to interpretation by experts, is required. In addition, the decision shakers and tine general public find it difficult 0 relate to a such at standard. Finally, t➢-.e Carlsbad plan contains a number of elements (-q ater, sewer, schools), where the performance star, lards are left to the responsible special district: " Line capacity to meet demand as determined by the appropriate district.." or "School capacity to meet projected enrollment as determined by the appropriate school district..:'. In other words, if another agency says they can provide service, then the "Performance standard" is met. FINANCING Financing of public facilities and services is another difficult area. The plan discusses available financing alternatives, but for the most part Heaves out the aclaud financing to the project level. The financing options are outlined below:. 1. Cash / Pay as you go: EJ The City charges development fees based on each development's pro -rata share of cost. When enough cash is accumulated, the project is constructed by the City. 2. Reimbursement /agreements: Developer constructs more than his pro -rata fair share of some improvements; he is later reimbursed as ofll ar development occurs. 3. Credit for City Fees: Certain development fees are waived in exchange for actual construcOon of public facilities by the developer. 4. Debt Financing. This includes several alternatives such as Assessment Districts, various bonds, and Certificates of participation. These methods generate cash up front, allowing immediate construction of needed facilities, with the debt being paid off over a number of years. ES-1 mffi 9 The Carlsbad plan contains policies under which sons;, of fuese financing mechanisms may be used, but does not stipulate how each improvement or facility is to be funded. Instead, the program relies on the City's Capital improvwment Program and the Local Management Plana for solutions. GROWTH MANAGEMEiMt'Y` M)WMICHO CUCAMONGA Rancho Cucamonga has had growth management since 1979. Our first Growth Management Ordinance was adopted in response to school impaction and water and sewer problems brought about by a combination of explosive residential growth and inadequate planning prior to incorporation. In 1983 the main features of our growth management program were finco into the City' Jlevelop., sent Cone, which, in conjunction with development fees, mandatory "will serve" letters, and other regulations, still constitutes the basis of our growth management program today. Tt a goal of our growth management pro, - is to assure that ag new development tales place, facilities and services u cessary to support new Growth are or will be available to our citizens. To obtain City approval, all projects MUST. 1. Meet the density and land use limitations prescribea by the General Flan and Development Code; and 2. Construct all public improvements and fatalities directly required for the project; and 3. Construct or pay for their fair share of citywide off site improvemen' a and facilities. /D When a development project is proposed it must meet c A brief description of how the growth management Praxta n mandatory outlined below, DENSM /LAND I Each project MUST meat the densi General Plan and Dex9?apment Code. ��cr atria Iirnins prescribed ch$ number of dwellings which may be built on a A. given parcel and in the City an a whaler Li additiosx, the City, has vssr high design sttandarcls assure certtiin labels of quality and compatibility in all Projects. These strict design standards have are low is heducir. the actual densities far t�o�t resirlentasl projects to l6veis that are laver bow thaw nerinsited by the General Plan. The table be this :point ( Densities are given in dwells g units per acre); low For each project, In number and � aI' d�eellings factors Becosste the b�ssis on which development fees and site area, location and other are based. required Improvements &—t( Zoning Density Rams Average Densities ew) Vl, ',very low) Ioss than 2 du / ac :. 1.0 du / ac L (low) 2-4 du / ao 2.54 du t ac LM (low - medium) 4-8 du / ac 5.05 des / ac M (medium) i 8-14 du/ac 10.04 du / ac M4 (medium - m h ) 14 -24 du /ac 21.:2 du!a* H (high) 4.3o d'u' ac I None Approved I For each project, In number and � aI' d�eellings factors Becosste the b�ssis on which development fees and site area, location and other are based. required Improvements &—t( I;''.�,6ERUCMA'I'i4 N The City has an ambitious performance standard for its parka. 5 acres of parks per 1,000 population. In order to obtain City approvals, all residential development must either provide improved parkand, or pay in -lieu fees equivalent to unproved parkland, based on a formula adopted by the City Council. Sometimes, the City requires a combination of dedication and fees, Large residential projects are required to meet their obligation through dedication of land and construction of actual park facilities. This can be planned and timed to assure that adequate recreational facilities are in place at the time the project is completed and residents move in. Smaller subdivisions are more likely t3 pay fir -lieu fees. When a projects' obligation is half an acre of parkland, as is typicAJ,, of many sm=aller subdivisions, it is not practical to require the developer to construct a pocket park for the now residents. Instead, equivalent fees are obtained prior to the issuance of building permits, and when enough fees are accumulated to pay for a ty2 ical 6-8 acre neighborhood park, the facility is developed by the City, As a result, the constraction of such a park is delayed until enough funds are acmmulatod ihrought fees. Although adequate facilities are evantualhy constructed, there is a «growth lag" between the time some new residents move in and the time adequate facilities 'become available. Another challenge is the 3 acre per 1,000 population limit the State Legislature placed on the City's ability to require parkland or fees;. Since our goal is 5/1,000, the City must rely on additional dedications and funding to meet its ultimate recreation goals. Ordinances 105 through 1050, attached, ( APPENDIX "B-T) clarify the formulas used to exact fees and dedications from new development. CIRCULATION The developmant of an appropriate circulation system is controlled by the Circulation Memant of the General Plan. This plan identifies the ultimate circulation framewo=rk for the City; the locations and hierarchy of major streets, number of traffic lames, access to freeways, etc. The circulations plan is based on projected growth and is designed to accommodate traffic when tha City is buAt out. Each now development is required to construct a critical network of streets which are necessary to serve the project and the community as a whole. This network must be consistent with the City's eirculatitou plan. x`12 In addition, eech new development has an incremental impact on the City's overall circals..:on system. To obtain approvals, each project is required to contribute a systems fee equivalent to it s share of overall improvements. TVase is fees are used to construct major transportation facilities that are of benefit to the entire community. Challenges similar to the development of parks face the development of the circulation system. Although systems fee contributions are exacted continuously in small increments, it is not practical to undertake circulation improvements in bits and pieces. Rather, improvements are iAade in lobical phases when enough funds accumulate. To avoid a lag, the City *rust contribute to the development of key facilities from other funding sources. The City is in the process of having its entire circulation system analyzed by computer modeling techniques. The outcome of that study ^_nay rosult in recommendations to require the payment of impact fees to fund a capital projects program which will insure the capacity and safety of the community's circulation system. DRAINAGE AND FZA)OD PROTECTION The City has a series of storm drainage master plans which S_ Po as a guide in determining necessary drainage facilities. Each new development ra _-squired to construct facilities necessary tz prat€,.;, not only itself, but also downstream areas, in accordance with the appropriato master plan. This insures that the master planned facO -- is eWier built by the developer, or that the developer shares in the cost by the payment of proper fees. Recently, the City has completed a new evaluation for the EtiwandalSan Sevaine area, and other areas are being reviewed. This study will also reevaluate the costs Of completion of all master pirm storm drains and regional flood protection facilities to make sure that the capital projects program is adegr ately supported by development fees. Although school finance g has never been within the City's realm, school capacities have always bean an extremely important element of our growth management program. Raz. ho Cucamonga had initially been one of the few cities in California to require school capacity "aiii serve' letters. In essence, the City would not issue building permits for any project unless the affected school district issued a letter stating it had the abality to serve the new students generated by the project. This growth management tool strengthened the school districts' ability to negotiate fees arAd improvement agreements from developers. & -f3 Recent State Law changes have taken away the ability of cities to withhold building permits on this basis. instead, school districts are now allowed to charge fees directly. The city's role today is to assure that the appropriate feca have been paid before building permits are issued. WATER & SEWIR Water and sewer services in Rancho Cucamonga are provided by an independent Special District, the CCWD, which is governed by an electe:i Bomrd of Directors. The District has an adopted Master PIan. Since the inception of our growth management program, the CCWD star has participated in the review of all projects submitted to the City. Prior to final approval, the CCWD must certify in writing that it will be able to serve the project. I -I,� Fire protection is provided by the Foothih Fire Protection District. The District Alk staff also participates in the review process, and no auorovals are granted by the City unless the District has cleared the project for comp lance with fire protection Y standards. 0 BEAUTIFICATION The City has an established program for the landscaping of streets, including median islands and parkways and for the a �ndergroundins* of most overhear utilities (electric lines 66kv or above., ara exempt). As now development takes place, it is required to underground utilities, to install apprtpriate landscaping, and to provide a mechanism for ongoing maintenance. In addition, each new project contributes fees toward the beautification of major arterials citywie i (it should be noted that beautification feet; cannot ba used for the undergrounding of utilities). & -f4 E s 0� The ,'ury is still out on the merits of .he Carlsbad Growth Management Plan, but here are some thoughts: Ovezall, the Carlsbad Growth Management Plan is very well thought out. The Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan has the advantage of combining most (although not all) of tho necessary facilities and services into one comprehensive document. This affords a broader picture of the various requirements, and, at least in theory, allows a comparison among service levels in different areas of public services. The Carlsbad Plan represents an up to date approach to dcr:iag with growth related issues. Its development was aided by years of practical experience with various other approaches to growth management, including ours. By the time the "arlsbad Plan came about, the legal principles of growth crintrol were well established, and the plan relies heavily- on the legally x ,,quired "Rinks" between the city's ability to require exactions and improvements and the anticipated impacts associated with new development The Carlsbad plan is yet to be tested. In our discussions with those familiar with the Carlsbad program, it became apparent that par+- of the plan are not working quite the way as was intended. The key to implementing the plan is the preparation of Local Facility Management Plan for 25 plannirW areas of the city. In a number of areas where there --r3 multiple ownerships, and areas that are already paztielly developed, the city is now stepping in to develop plans, to define standards, and to facilitate financing. Not surprisingly, Rancho Cucamonga feces the same challenge. In m&ny ways, the two approaches to growth management are very similar. They are both based on the premise that new development must provide the necessary public facilities needed to support new residents. They both contain limitations on the level of ultimate buildout, and they both rely on the approval of other agencim for wrvices.not provided by the city-. The Carlsbad program goes a long way toward dealing with growth issues. However, it laas no magic answers for the two most difficult questions that also face Rancho Cucamonga; (1) how to clearly a *fine the appropriate level of service for ALL services and public improvements, and (2), how to pay for them in a timely and equitable fashion. These are the very questions that have been at the heart of our own, growth management program since its inception in 19 79. Defining in specific ways the necessary levels o: service, and searching for financing to ensure that needed facilities are built aA the right time, has been, and has to be, a continuous proceas. &'1J5 u 1, CITY CIRCULATION PLANNING - CIRCULATION PRIORITIES - STAT6,, ,REVIEW OF 1986 ACTION PLAN - TRANSF'"ATATIAN PLANNING MODEL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAONGA MEMORANDUM bATF,: February 93, 1989 TO: Mwcbers of the City Council and Acting Ci ity,Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engine, 3v* Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: City circulation planning iii Titer attached rr,;ort, cover efforts since late 1986 by the council and staf.1 to enhance the City's �accnmmodation of Vie rapid growth which has continued since the mid-19801s. 1986 Cir�-ulation Action Plan In late 1986, the City 'Coucgcil adopted a 13 -point action program to improve circulation throughout the City and take maximum advantage of new development to install major streets. Also involved was a considerable public works effort. The January 11, 1989, Status Review of the 1986 Action Piar gives the current status of the program. All of the Groups I and II priorities are underway or programmed within the next five years, well ahead of the original ten -year implementation horizon. 1988!89 Transportation PlaAni! blade! This study will expand pr...vtr gild -out models to provide two -year estimates of service levels to enable the staff tc► better determine the phasing of related improvements. Existing traffic studies have provided a toot for master planning street and ireL%rsection sizes and placing conditions on development projects. A new law, AS 1600, requires the City to establish a direct relationship between its System Develop mr�t Fee and the traffic g:nerated by development. The new Trausporta',,on Planning Model will provide that reiationshIp, as well as the ability to look at tiNe PE00S prior to build-out so that the impacts of development can be assessed as it occurs. RHM :PAR:sd Attachments 9 -17 CITY OF RANC5D CUCAMONGA o� canro STAFF REPORT O O DATE: November 5, 1986 F z U a To. City Council and City Manageo 1977 �( FROM: Jack Lam, Community Development nivector I BY: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Enrjineer SUBJECT: Subcommittee Recommendation on Circulation Priorities and Scheduling REcomENDATION 1} is recommended that Coutr�-ti adopt the Subcommittee CircuW ion Action Plan attached as 'Exhibit B" ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND As a part of the Ccuncils review of circulation issues several options were identified and a subcommittee established to review options and make recommendation. The appointed subcorrtittee comprised of staff, Mayor King and Councilman Buquet. The original options identified are attached Ls Exhibit A. The results of subcommittee review and its dicussions with staff is d draft action plan establishing priorities and t;meframes for tte implementation of an enhanced circulation improvement program. ISSUES DISCUSSED: The Circulation subcommittee reviewed the identified options in relation, to current budget programs apt: priorites with consideration given to funding constraints. The four primary sources of existing funding include: Gas Tax $950,C,10 (Dedicated to Maintenance) TDA Article 8 $885,000 Systems Development F6,1ds $1,800,000 (Depends on level of 'eveloament activity) Federal Funds when appropriated i Funds available for construction range from $2.5 to 3.0 million dependent on the level of development activity and Federal allocations. Given our current backlog of pavement repair needs all funds could be dedicated to T0: City Counci, and City Manager SUBJECT: Subcommittee Recommendation on Circulation Priorities and scheduling DATE: November 5, 1986 PAGE 2 an adequate pavement management program. Hcwever, staff recommends and the subcommittee concurred that no more than $1.0 millicn should be allocated to the pave* ?nt management program, City Funds remaining for major improvements would not exceed $1.5 to 2.0 million per year. With the exception of funds budgeted for design of the MillVten Grade Separation, Arrow Route betwoen Archibald and Turner, and Base Line east of Etiwanda Avenue, none of the identified optign5 are funded in the current program. Acceleration of project` :development requires elimination of elements in the existing program. (see attached program schedule) The Options Summary was revic,.sed and priority groupings were established. Priorities were based on benefit -cost, need, available funding, physical and institutional constraints to constr;+ciion. The recommended Group I prfa7ities include the development of Nineteenth Street, Milliken Avenue: and sisnai augimntation and coordination along Base ,'ne from Haven to the west City linits dnd Archibald from Fourth to Nineteenth Street. These priorities and the.remaining priority groupings are more fully developed in the attached reco=.znded action plan Resp ctfull #hnitted, �'. 7 f JACK LAM Community Development 0iroctor JL:LBH:dlw Attachmots E, i; Exhibit A OPTION SUMMARY AUGMENT SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION /COORDINATIOM f- COMPLETION OF MILLIKEN AVENUE { - BUILD MILLIKEN GRADE SEPARATION COMPLETION OF BASE LINE ROAD - DEVELOP ARCHIBALD- TURNER HELLMAN CORRIDOR - HIGHLAND AVENUE. I14PROVEMENTS - FOOTHILL BLVD. INTERSECTION F-%,cSIGN STUDIES - 19TH 'STREET SIGNALS AND WIDENING -- REMOVE OR WIDEN FOOTHILL BRIDGE AT BAKER - WIDEN ARROW BETWEEN ARCHIBALF AND TURNER - ACCELERATE FOOTHILL BLVD. MEDIAN ISLANDS - BUILD HAVE AVENUE GRADE SEEARATION - INITIATE T-15/6TH STREET INTERCHANGE IMPLEMENTATION: ?O -YEAR HORIZON E, i; EXHIBIT B RECOMMENDED CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIRCULATION ACTION PLAN GROUP I PRTGRI""TES FOOTHILL FREEWAY: Actively pursue development NINETEE4TH STREET The development of Nineteenth Street should be given top priority for immediate implementation of the widening to master plan width from Haven Avenue to the west city limits including the installation and coordination of traffic signals at: Sapphire Beryl Hellman Amethyst Hermosa The project shall replace the Grove Avenue Improvement Program from Chaffee to Foothill Boulevard in the 1986 -87 Capital Program. Project scheduled for construction in the 1987 -88 fiscal year. MILLIKEN AVENUE Milliken Avenue shall be given highest priority for completion from its current terminus at Seventh St-eet to Base Line Road. Staff shall explore all options for accelerated construction of roadway segments and the grade separation with the Santa Fe Railroad. Staff is further directed to contact the following property owners to review development policies and funding options to complete the needed construction: Lewis Development Company Santa Fe Pacific Realty Corporation General Dynamics Poiicies and options to be reviewed are development restriction policies 1911 Act assessment funding mechanisms for both Milliken Avenue and the grade separation construction. Staff should immediately retain the services of tke OeLeuw- Cather Company to complete grade separation design and petition the Public Utilities Commission for grade separation funds. A goal is established to have the project complete within three (3) years. SIGNAL CUNSTRUGTION /COORDINATION Priority shall be given to completion of signals and improvements required to coordinate traffic on Base Line Road from Haven Avenue to the west city limits and on Archibald Avenue froal Fourth Street to Nineteenth Street. Appropriate budget sijustment shall be made to accomplish project completion in the 19$7 -88 fiscal year,. GROUP iI PRIORITUS Group II priority projects are of more than usual concern an, shall be expediousiy pursued within program and funding constraints for a targeted completion within 5- years. These projects are variously constrained pnysiraliy and institutionally and require coordination with other projects as noted. BASE LINE ROAD Caripletion of ease Line Road from Haven Avenue to the Cast city limits shall be aggressively pursued with development interests to allow full comletion with two years after construction of the ease Line Road - Day Creek bridge construction. ARROW ROUTE Arrow Route widenilig from Archibald Avenue to Turner Avenue shall be developed in the current fiscal year including accurate cost estimates and right of way requirements. Serious consider,',tion for funding shall ber,in in the 1987 -88 fiscal year. HIGHLAND AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS. Future development impacting Highland Avenue east of Haven Avenue shall be carefully reviewed to insure that adequate safety provision are incorporated prior to beginning of ccnstruc',ion of any development accessic,g this segment of highway. Items of spi.cific concern are: o Adequate provisions for turn movements at all access points o Adequate provisions for acceleration and deceleration shall be req+ired to accommodate development traffic prior to beginning of construction li o Accelerated signal construction at access points: shall be considered with special attention given to intersections with Milliken Avenue, Etiwanda Avenue, 8nst Avenue I G " ?,2— 11 3 ARCHIBALD- TURNER- HELLMPV RRIDOR DEVELOPMENT It is recognized that until completion of the Foothill Freeway all north - south access routes to Interstate ip will be subject to potential impact. This impaction can be, minimized through, the further development of Turner and Hellman Avenues as full secondary arterials south of Foothill Boulevard. It is recognized however, that both streets are severely constraint hk4 narrow railroad grade crossings that cannot be adequately improved without significant expenditures fo* storm drain facilities. In order to expedite improvements, railroad crossing application stall be pursued exReditiously and alterntive revenue sources for storm drain installation shall be explored. FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DEVELOPMENT This element involves primarily the installation of median islind in Foothill Boulevard from Haven Avenue west. This project is an element of the Foothill corridor plan and' should follow closely upon adoption of the plan. It is recognized that Foothill Boulevard 'c a _state highway and detail design features -- require state approval. Pr?iject ic3piementation she-uld be targeted towards the end of the 5th year. GROUP III PRIORITIES Group III priority projects are long terns improvements involving significant resource copmittments and approvals from other agencies. These projects are significant to long term system operations but involve extended timeframes. These prof is should be pursued in the five W ten year time horizon with the following notes! c, I- 1516th Street interchange - initiate stage 1 project approval with CALTRANS to allow active development plan in the 5 -10 year programing 0 Foothill Bridge at the Southern Pacific Railroad - railroad abandonment should be actively lobbied as preferred alternate to bridge reconstruction. o Haven Grade Separation at Santa Fe Railroad - Actively seek Public Utilities Commission Funding - Project should not compete with Milliken Avenue funding opportunities 11 3 D CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM GtyCAMVN O� d DATE: January 11, 1998 TO: .lack Lam, Acting City Manager � FROM: Russell H. Magaire, City Engine BY: Sigmund Dellhime, Administrative Assistant SUBJECT: view of the Circulation Action Plan of 1986 ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND :977 i In Novembk r 1986, ti.e City Council approved a Circalat(on Action Plan in which specific circulation priorities and an implementation schedule vrerL adopted. Detailed in the following is r status report on the pr4ecia listed in the plan, GROUPIPRIORIT'MS Nineteenth Street projects fall under two categories: street widening and intersection signalization.. a) The following widening projects an. underway: 1. Wect City Limits to Jasper Street- the scope for this project has been expanded to incorporate work on Nineteenth Street from the West City Limit to Carnelian Street: flans for this project an nearing completion and the project will be under construction later in Fiscal Year 88189. 2. Hermosa Avenue to Cartilla Avenue - the scope of this project hay been expended to incorporate work on Nineteenth Street from Archibald Avenue to west of Haven. Avenue. Improvement plans are preliminarily complete anci right -of- way iegotiations are currently underway. 3. Beryl Street to west of Amethyst Street, the scope of this project has been expanded to incorporate work, on Nineteenth Street from Carnelian Street to west of Amethyst Street. Since this project will exceed one half million dollars to construct, it is included in the State Transportation ?improvement Program and must be reviewed and approved by +ha State. Flans are currently under de +:gry the necessary assessment district formation is being - cheduled, and right -of -way negotiations will follow the distri( formation. 4. Amethyst Street at Nineteent;,'1-treet- the scope of this project has been expanded to incorporate work in the area of Nineteenth Street from west ofAmethyst Street to Archibald Avenue. The construction conk tut for this project has been awarded and work is scheduled to begnu in January 1989 and conclude in April 1989. 5. Haven Avenue at Kheteenth Street- this project is currently out to bld. b) The following intersection signaiization projects are underway: 1. Haven Avenue at NuneCcenth Street- please refer to item 5 listed abovs. 2. Amethyst Street at Nineteenth Street - please refer to item 4 listed abova. 3.. Baryl Street and Hell san Avenut .st Nineteenth Street - plea" refer to item 3 above. 4. Hermosa Avenue at Nineteenth Street - design and approvals for this project will be completed in this Fiscal Year. Although the exact schedule is affected by the major construction of the Church/Hermosa storm drain, the construction of the signal will begin in; Fiscal Yea€ 198919o. 5. 5 )phire Street at N imeteenth Stan,- the City in assor tation ..nth the City of Upland is working with Caltrans to have the signal installed concurrently with the Upland subdivit.'Va development planned f -w construction on the south side of Nineteenth Street south of the Sapphire Street intersection. The ds:+slcgmsnt of Milliken Avenue from its current terminus at Seventh Street to Highland Avenue involves ror-dway mnctructirn and grade separation at the, Santa Fe Railway crossing. ptcdects 1 ,roceeding ens foilvws: a) Forth of Seventh S.rem to south ofdersey Boulevard this section is currently under design and is proceeding through review and approval, which is a multi year process; Construction is dependent on the availability of funding and private development constructing the connections to Seventh;5,reet and Jersey Boulevard. El Construction will take approximately two years to complete and may start within three years. b) Sixth Street to Seventh Street - constructior of the improvements is dependent upon the development of Cenral Dynaa.?rs property on tlae west side of the Milliken Avenue alignment. c) Jersey Boulevard to arrow Route - construction,-? the improvements to this w- tion is dependent upon the developmert of t}te O'Bonnel, ArmstL. wg, Bril;ham and Partners' project or, the old Santa Fe property. Conslsuction will include partial oze ivation work for the railway grade separation. d Arrow Route to Foothill Boulevard - this segment will be dependent upon the development of the adjacent prcpert?es. o) Foothill Boulevard to Base Line itcad this section is under construction by Lewis homes as part cf t � Terra Vista development. While portions of !he roadway may be (,penitionsl sooner, the entire section will be op&n by summer 1989. f) Base Line Road toVictoria Park Lane this roadway segment is basically complete and open to traffic. g) Victoria Park Lane to Highland Avenue - this section is under construction by the William Lyon Compsay in coo- .ametion with the City's installation of a traffic signal at Highland Ave- -. The roadway bring constructed by the developer will be open and operational by Mari? :L989. STGNAf, CONg,`$�? •TIEiN airs] .n�sRDTNrATY Three signal coordination projects will be completed during this•Fiscai Year 1988!89. The projects are: a) Bt3* Line Road - all equipment necessary for signal coordination bus be in installed from Raven Avenue to the west City limit. Fine 1 of the timing should be completed by the middle cUanuray b) Archibaid Avenue - consultant proposals, fen inventoryi=ng existing signal equipment, detarmining what additional equipment may be necessary and what the timing shou.Abe, and the installation of the timing, are expected shortly, The tentative schedule for the commletion of mgnal coordination is by April !989. c) Haven Avenue twnsultaay -5ropoaals, for inventorying existing signal equipment, determu.:.kg V. Art additional equipment may be n wsany end w, a&t the timing should be, and the installation of the Um.-U, are expected shortly The tentative schedule for the completion of signal coordination is by June 1989. GROUP U MORMES 11 A goal to complete the following projects .within five years was established by the City Council. The status of the projects are as follows: a) Estia Line Hand 'bad from haven Avenue to the en5t Lila Limi n 1. Base Line Road Phase I (East City Limits to Etwanda Avenue) improvement plans for this project, including the insta; jation of a traffic signal at Etiwanda Avenue, are preliminarily complete and right-of-way negotiations are currently underway. 2. Base Line Road Fhsse iI (Etiwanda A:eaue to Victoria Park Lane). improvement plans for this project, including the nstallati(m of a tra.'fic signal at Victoria Park Lane, are nearing completion and right -of -way negotiations are currently underway. 3. Base Line Road Phase ni Victoria Park Lane to Rochester Avenue) - the project is under design and is being conducted in coordination with tha nay Creek Channel Phase its project and includes the installation of a traffic signal at Rochester Avenue. 4. Milliken Avenue to Rochester Avenur - this section of roadway is under design, and *21 be constructed Yy Lawi. Homes and the William Lyon Company as a part of their developments. The design and construction is being conducted in coordination with Base Line Road Phase M. 5. Haven Avenue to Milliken Avenue - this section of road is basically complete and has four operational lanes. The installation of a traffic sigr, al at IV..!Aon Avenue is under c ^,.utruction by Lewis Homes. The only -,.ontage improvements 3-,t to be conca sted. are those to be constructed along with the Rancho Cucamonga City Park. b) ern. r , m aR,ild Av�tL,;et„ HEY "x— s_�en 1. Arrow Route Phase I (North Side) - this section of roadway is complete. 2, Arrow Route Phrase II (South Side) - improvement pia ass for this project, including the instailaktion of a trrAc signal st Hermosa Avenue, are prelimiaaraly complete And right- of nay negotiations are currently unCerway. s. Signal upgrades - the upgrading of the traffic signal on Arrow Route at Archibald Avenue is currently under deli 4 n, &-Z7 !7 >) Highland Avenue east of ff_ay Avenue 1. Design Standards - design standards have been adopted, and are being applied to insure the adequate provision for traffic acceleration, deceleration, and turn movements. 2. Traffic Signals i. The installation of the traffic signals on Highland Avenue at Milliken and Etiwanda Aranues are under contract. Construction of Edwanda Avenue, is expected to be eompleted by the end of FebruxT. Construction at Milliken Avenue will be scheduled as soon as permits are issued by Caltrans. iii. The installation of a traffic signal at East Avenue in being conditioned with, and will be a requirenatnt of, all developments within the vicinity of the intersection. ABOHIBALD - HisiL14LAN The development of the Arehibal,..1 Avenue, FIellmaz Avenue and Hermosa Avenue corridors entails street wio'enings, the installation of storm drains, the widening of rail road crossings, and the installation of traffic Signals. By street the status is: Archibald Avenue., 1. The improvements on ArchdWd, Avonue south of Highland Avenue are basically complete. 2. The improvements to Archibald Ave:-me from iighland Avenue tr. Lemon Avenue ars currently under construction. 3. The design of the improvements f m south of Banyan to H3Wgd' Road are scheduled to be designed this Fiscal Year 1988/89 with construc'rson se8 for FIsQd Year 1:'89190. b) Storm Drains - Area lY ArW-Ud Storm brain 1. Phases Is: (Drtbr Creek Channel to Skth Sweet) and lb (Fourth Street east of Archibald) an set for design in Fiscal Year 1989190 and construction in Fiscal Year 1990`9L &-7,L 2. Phases 2a (Sixth Street to Eighth 3trest) and 2b (Sixth Street west on Sixth Street) are set for design in FSscr'. Year 1990/91 and constrnctirn in Fiscal Year 1991/92. 3. '".rase 3 (Eighth Street to Devon Street) are set for design in Fiscal'ear 1991/92 and construction in Fiscal Year 1992193. 4. Area IV Hillsido ;Road Storm Drain Phase 1 from Malachite Avenno to Archibald Avenue is under construction. ft.4 3 2 from Alta Loma Channel to Archibald Avenue � being designed and will also be constructed this Fis:;A Year 1988189. 5. Area VI Vvtper Cucamonga Stor.n Drain from the Southern Pacific Rail Road at Arzhfl)pld Avenue to Monte Vista Street is set for design d construction in Fiscal Ycar 1989190. 6, Area VI Xemcn Storm D.LLn from the Alta Lome Channel to Amethyst Street is Untati*7 scheduled to be designed and constructed in this Fiscal Year 1989f89. 7. Area VI Highland Ananm Storm Drain from the lower Alta Tama Ohannel to Archibald Avenue is tentatively scheduled tote designed and constructed in this Fiscal Ye 1988(89: S. Area VII Foothill Storrs J from ArclZ;b ?3 A.,Wlue to the Deer Ureek haaml is to be designed and constructed as part of the Phase 2 of the RDA F've BoW ovard Implementation Plan. Design and r3 a., unction is tentatively scheduled for Fiscal Yew, ,591A2. c) Rvil Road Crossings - the Archibald A ue at gss.iq mossings at the Aiehimn, Topeka and Santa Fe l:.s:;l Road and the southern Pacific Fe" Road are complete. d) Traffic Signals - traffic signah will be installed on Archibald Avenue at the following inter sections: L N'Mthe Street - is complete. 2. Hirhlaud Avenue - is awrentiy under construction. . 3. Leman Avenue - will be designed in this Fiscal Ycs- 1S88l89 and is set for installation in Raml !tear 1589,130. 4. Eighth Street and San Bernardino rkad, - mt set for design in Fiscal Year 198A/99 and installation in Fiscal Year 1990/91. U 5. Whson Avenue - is set for d:sigx and installation ir. Fiscal Ysar 1991/92. 6. Seven' h. Street and Victoria Avenue are set for design and installation in Fiscal Year 199:-33 jjw, -, AvenuA: a) St;Aets- 1. Tb, maz7ga of the widening and improvement from Hare Ln^ Roao: to Yinett -sth Street is set for design in Fist Year 1989190 and construction in Fiscal Year 1990/51. 2„ Improvements frem south of Banyan Street to Hillside Road are set for design in Fiscal Y*,z 1995/92 and construction ;n Msctl Your 1992193. b) Storm ?gains - the Area IV Lower Hellman Storm Drain: 1. The section £ivm the Southern PdeWc Rail RAad to YOnte Vista Strew is undo. construction. Phases 1 ind 2 from Cucamonga Creek to Hellman Aveauz rmlong the Southern Pecific. RaR Read are being designee and are set for construction in We Fiscal Year 1985!$3. 3. The seaon frain the Cucamonga Mannel to n-,Ah er Fcolhiil Boul¢-i-vrd will be construcWd -- r_*ordination with Phcp-a W of flat Foutbill gl:nr. The tentative ss:lredule dma not call for either design or eoastruction during the current five year planning cycle. c) hail Road Crossings - 1 Tho wideni v at the Atchi.- .-,. Topeka and Santa Fe Rail Road wall he scheduled for desigr. and rarrstaucted con"ur,intly with the Area IV Lower Hellman S';ornr Drain. 2. she Wideat .g at ibe 5outhorn Pacific Rail Road is ourrendy under design, with conotruction set for Fiscal: Year 19881M d) "redo S:gna.Is I. Sc 3ernardino Read io art for design and irrrtallation in Fiscal Year 1989/90. � `O i 2. Church Street; is set for design and installation in Fiscad y6hr 1990191. 3, Ninth Street is set foz design and installation in Fiscal Year 1992/93 4. Nineteenth Street is in conjunction with the street improvements on Nineteenth Stree„ ��Ii� Aver}ig, ` a) Streets I 1. The design of the widening and improvement from Stanford utreet to Lemon Avenue is not for design in F1sea1 Year 1990/91 and construction in Fiscal year 199LS2. 2. improvement from Coat Street to Wilson Avenue is set for design &nd construction in 4`` scd Year 1991/92. r 3. Improwiment front Fourth Street to Arrow Route And fram Wilson Avenue to Vista Grove is set for design in Fiscal Year 1991192 said eunstruniion in Fiscal Year 1992133. This schedule is contingent upon the complete `tha Foothill Storer Drain Phase 2 b) Sturm Drains I. Area IV 14wer Hormosa Storm Drain Phase 2 from Fourth Street to Sixth Street is set foi, design in Fiscal Year 1990191 and construction in Fizcai Year 1991/92. This schedule is contngent upon the construction of the Foothill Storm Drain Phree 2. 2. Area IV V011wi Aver:.:) Mermosa Stcry, Erman on Hermosa Avxnue.nT . n: le Alta Loma iiasinj to 'Wilcon Ava vas, and east un :°ilson Avenue is set for design and a lstruciioa in Fiscal Yesi Y99_9 g. Area VI CTI-arcta/Hermosa storm Drain Phase i from the Church b i zin aiwg Chur+;h Street and Hermosa Avenue to the 3o' ahem Paciiio Rail Rosd is under design and co"tructirn is schefiuleiY fr.? this Fi"'aai Year 19➢8/00. 4. 4rea'71 4burchMalmoaa Sturm Drain Phase �A along 110r ac ss avenue .roan the Southern Pacific Rail Road to `v;aanth Street is under deagn and �ched&ed for tilde F'iscs+i. Year x98£2:0; C) Rail Rost?, ., 1. The wideni,-ig at the Atcl`imn, Topeka and Santa Fe Rail Road is set fbr design in Fiscal Year 1990/91, funding sought n Fiscal Year I?MJ92 and cos,)truction in Fiscal Year 1992x93. This project is contingent upon the zompletion of the Area VI Churchl :iermosa Storr Drain an the Foothill Storms drain Phase 2. 2. The widening at the Southern Pacific Rail Road is set for design in Fiscal Year 1989/90 and construct.io-i in Fiscal Year 1919W91. d) Traffic Sierials 1. Nmet, Qaf'i Street -is set for design this Fiscal Y::ar 1988W and installation in Fi" dear 1989/90. 2. Chun,'h Street - is set for design in Fiscal Year 1989/90 and instasa?atfon in Fiscal Year 1990/91 3. Fourth Streai is get for design in MLcal Year ,1990/91 and ins..sllation in Fiecal Yes,—, 199VI 2. 4. Highlaad A,-A Lemon Avenues - is sei, for design in Fis..al Year 1991/92 and installation in Fiscal Year 1992!A3. 5. Arrow Rote :s in conjuction with tka aatreet improvements on Arrow Route P!'hitae H (south side). The development of Foothill Boulevard is scheduled in four phases. Project programming for all phases and the section of Foothill Boulevard from Rochester A'�v, nue to the Interstate 15 inter, hangs into the STIP (State Trsnapertatiou Improvement Program) will be prepared for the review and approval o: Caltrar.s. The re•N,ezv and approval process is set to begin thita Fiscal Year 1999 180 an4 continue :thmugh F aml year 1996/91. a) A contrsct fre the design Of the 1.15/66 ai erchanga mocUlcation has been approvsd. ConsWuction is asrheduied tJ he& in late Fiscal Year 1989/90. b) Riess I Foothill BoWovard ! mprovements are from the W'ast City Limit to Lion Siawt. Tberi improvements include fne %idening of Foothill Boulevard and of Vineyard Avenue north of Foothill, he upgraelFng of four existing traffic siEials, thz; installation of a traffic signal at Balser Avenue, and the widening Of the Southern Pacific Rsil Road overpass bridge. The design of the Phase I improvements will begin in Na Fiscal Year 1988/89 and be completed in Fiscal Year 1989/90. Construction is set to begin in Ficsstj Yeas 1990/91. 1` of rsil roae overpass bridge widening will take approximat,2 y t,vo years. Flo :c for the widening are errrently being processed with the California C' L EI Public Utilities Commissf on. Funding for dais project will include $1.6 million from Caltrans. c) Phase H Foothill Boulevard Improvements are fmin Helms Avenue to Haven Avenue. These improvements include the widening of Foothill Boulevard, a tra£f'ie signal at Malachite Avenue, and the construction of the l' .athill Storm Drain Phase IL d) Phase III of Foothill Boulevard is from Lion Street to Helms Avenue and will involve the construction of the Area N Hellman Storm Dr,-;a and '.he widening of FcoNII Boulevard Work on this phase is projccW to begin within seven to eight years. e) Pbwe rV of Foothill Boulevard is from Interstate 15 to the East City Limit. 7Work on this phase is anticipated to begin wi+hin ten years. GROUP III P'RYQRIMS UngT Three long term projects are idinti6ed under the Group Three priorities. They are the Interstate 15 and Sixth Street Interchange, the widi :ung of the Southern Pacific hail, Road overpass at Foothill Boulevard, and the grade separation of Haven Avraca and I Atchison, Top9ka and Santa Fe Rail Road. MEr'H' According to new Moral bighar{sy siandrtrci►, fieewsy interchungez must be spaced at qP least one mile apart. Therefore, an essessment of the need for the Intorstate 15 Interchange at `sixth Street will be ineorpornted into the Transportation Study scheduled for Fiscal Year '989/90. Based upon the study report the Zeasibility of the proposed interchange or any alternatives will be 4,-'--mined anti fa ling needs addreasad beginning with the Fiscal Year 199(/91 budget T�N.,,gAi'zi M RA, ,- ,'.2®An 0ti HEjt AT E1U1 !? L RQ 7i.':V'Rfl tie status of the Southern Pacific hail Rom overpass widening wai ,reviewed under the discussion of Footh:lh Boulevard x��rt Av .�rrr��,�;,� .RO�aI�r�. �T F �:�.1•:>�_rZ Work on ihs desr:Sa a .d strucdon of the grads separation of Haven Avenue and the Atchison, ToPaaka ana3 SWIta ! e Rxi :1 £toaC will begin, approximately, withea a minimum of ten yesam in µ,- u interim the se?ocatiop :fake crossing Bats arms and the rubberizing of the cruacing an under design during this >;S" Year 10.e8i89, and construction is set for 1513W Year ISSS I90. C- 33 THE RANCHO CUCK.Vbe. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING MODEL AND NEXUS PROCEDURES PROJECT G4ALS- This project is being implemented to accomplish two primary goals: 1) Establish an adequate transportation planning tool which evaluates the impact of traffic on the City street system including transit mode split automobile, bus, rail - to help determine our City's options and best solutions to future City';; Transportation needs; 2) Establish the procedure showing the nexus between a development and the City transportation system when imposing system fees on the development project as mancited by A31600. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The transportation planning model will forecast traffic volumes for the next ten years in two-year increments. Additionally, a build -out 'orecast will be made. Traffic impact on various component-4 of the trcnsportation system can be evaluated and mitigation measures plannad and implemented. Considerable flexibility will be built into the transportation model allowing evaluation of various additions or deletions to the City street system. The nexus evaluation is necessary to justify transportation system fees (A81600 mandate) The transportation planning made] will be used to established the connection between a project's traffic and its impact on the transportation system. SCOPE OF STUDY: PHASE A - TRANSPORTATION MODEL PREPARATION This phase of work is concerned with preparing the citywide transportation model. The following outlines the work tasks involved: 1. Model Structure The model structure and the software system to be used in the project will be defined in this task. Based ors a review of the street network, a suitable study area will be defined. A sufficiently large geographic area outside the City dill be included to reflect the effects of adjacent areas. The appropriate traffic analysis zones will then be defined for the study area. These will be based on criteria such as data availability, land use, access consideration, etc. The zones will be as sma.11 as is practically possible to etfnaF:ce the accuracy of the traffic volume projections. & -3q- PACE 2 2. Assemhle Transportation Model Data Ease In thin task, the transportation model data base will be assembled. The City will supply land use data for 1988 and fo: bdild -oat, and will also provide existing traffic data. A further set of data to be obtained in thtic task is regional trip data for 1988 and Post- 2020. The data will be assembled into suitable form for extracting the Rancho Cucamenga travel pattern. 3. Prepare Transportation Model A .9SO version of the transportation model will then ba prepared and used to �_._„aslt and assign trips to the circulation syst -m. Validation will he parried out to reflect existing traffic. 4. Cumulative Apalysi . - Two -'Near Incremental Anal +,psis This task will use the transportation model to forecast traffic volumes in two year increments Qvcr a 10 yetar period. Model runs will be carried out for existing conditions plus thl incre*eatal development anticipated for this tires frame. Type traffic volume projections and the level of service on t° °e arterial system and its intersections will then be evaluated. S. Build -out Model Run Based on pMojected land use, demographic data and proposed street network, 3 model run corresponding to build -nut conditions (Year - 2010 +) will be made. To provide the build -out projections, a "baseline" street network for build -out will be developed. It will comprise currently programreed or pplanned arterials and collector street.; (with assumed la r•• configurations). 6. mare Draft ke op its The results of Phase A will be presented in a draft study report. in addition, a completo use guide to the modeling system will be prepared as companion documents to the model descrifcioo report. This will contain step -by -step procedures for updating yr revising input data, developing new model runs, revising street network characteristics, audition, deleting or subdividing zones, and any other anticipated changes. The user ma ual will also highlight the iujor uses for the modeling system as an ongoing planning tool, and identify limitations on such uses. PHASE B - NEXUS PROCEDURES In this pnase of the study, the nei :is model procedures Ol l be developed. Presently, the City ;,as a direct mathcd of having its .street and bridge system ccmpleted by a development t�rough the . onditions of approval. These G -3.a PAGE 3 El- additions and improvements usually are on, through or adjacent to the development. The nexus between hraffic impact and street and bridge system improvement is obvious. The City also has an indirect method of funding th, construction of the street and bridge system. The City's syste%s development fee is ajsed tr mitigate indirect traffic impacts on the transportation system which are caused by fractional and accagW ative traffic impact from various developments, The model to be developed will establish the nexus, for both the direct and indirect methods. It will Adress the requirements of A81500 and be consistent with any other legal requirements. Subtasks to be carried .gut for this are as follows: 1. Evaluate existing procedures The work in this task will be to dete"mine appropriate requirements, procedures and methods 'or establishing appropriate system development fees in order to conform with A81600. in the case of the indirect raxus model, thi;: will in;rolve a determination as to whether the system development fee shomild ko evelua Ed by (a) joining an existing street and bridge system or (b) constructing necessary portions of the City's proposed transportation system. Parlous options will be explored in conjunction wits City staff and a suirW a %thodology i0mtifl,4. 2. Develop procedures Basic Mrmulas will be developed for nesideatial, cowrcial and industrial deveigWsnt fees. Traffiql impact stud procedures will be established for determining the syste0i development fern and incorporating the a.ecessary methodology into the traffic p`,anning model. Also an enabling City ordinance for system development fees for transportation system improvements will be developed. 3. Nexus procedures defined an mnual This task wIIll fully document the ne;KUS pr -)cedures; for both the direct and indirect -nethods. Items to be covered include: a. purp)se of the fee and a demonstration of the direct and indirect nexuses between a proposed develoment praject and the transportation improvements. b. identification of the use to -shich the fee will be put (e.g., street improvement, tea street construction, intersection modification traffic signal coostructi,on, t ^affic: sig:aal modification, traffic sigma interconnecting systems, etc.). LJ l PAGE 4 c. Demonstration that there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of thQ fee and *he cost of the portion of transportation system improvements attributable to the develi, -mnent rrojoct on which the fee is imposed. d. Guidelines for what is a reasonable maximum distance from thq proposed development and an improvement_. to the transportation system for a nexus to exist. e. Procedure and format for a "standard traffic impact stud.0 report which Is to be used as justification of the :nexus for any proposed development and improvements to the transportnt on system. f. An evaluation procedure to determine what type of improverm'snts to the transportation system is appropriate. g. A draft ordinance which, allows the City to impose fees on development to improve the City transportation system (streets and bridges) necessitated by the.traffic ".mpact (s) of the development or.. said system. h. Explanation o�how the "fair share" formula lakes into consideration not only a particular new project, but also the cumulative impacts of future development. COW 3ltliCT AND TIMELINE: A contract has been awarded and executed with the engineering firm of Aostin- Foust Associates. Our mode( should be complete in six to eight months. SOl Y., The City is developing a "gravity -based transportation made." using state -of- the -art softwane and land use and street network data -baslis that will allow considerable flexibility to determine Nture City transportation requirearants. it is a growth oanagement tool. It will be capable o° carrying out "what -if" scenarios regarding the transportation system and land ugc, The nexus procedure model will be capable of detersuining the relationship between a proposed development and its generated traffic. it is a tool to mitigate off -site traffic impacts and satisfys the le git oequirement of AB1500. (�-3% DRAFT 5-YEAR CAPITAL PROJECTS PROGRAM id- iti' /10701-02 o3 -8 -89 PG Agenda 3 of 3 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PROJECTS &-5 7 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PROJECTS rn Area ? ^�tf+rnn brain fNn own Baker /Arrow Storm Drgy; In an effort to retain the viability of existing neighborhoods, the Agent y contributed the cost of the construction of these two storm drains. These facilities reduced the exposure of these neighborhoods t� rains. damage, thus conserving their vr'se and extending their usable tifespans. Uorts Park: In conjunction with the City's Community Services Division, the Agency :gas identified property suitable for acquisition and development of a sports park. This park will pi hide much naeded lighted playing fields for baseball and soccer. Regional AbD=L enter. The Agency ha 4tered into An agreement with The Hahl= Company and Foothill ., aociates for that development (,f a 1 Million square foot regional shopping center at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and the I -15 Freeway. Ultimately housing six anchor tenants, construction of t:!e center is scheduled to begin in 1996. 1 -15 0-MA P: To improve area traffic circulation, the Agency is financing nnstaurtion of improvements to the Foothill Boulevard offramp . �e r 5. Fire Protect+ .. acii'ties� Working with the Foothill mire Protection District, the Agency has identified the need for three new fire stations, a mainte..anco facility and a training center. Phase 1 of the development of these facilities will include the acquisition of three sites, and the construction of two fire stations. Design work on the stations in Phases i has begun. Construction is scheduled to begin in fiscal year 1989/90. Public any /Civic Facili X. The Agency is acting as lead agent for the construction of a new Public Safety/Civic Facility. This 120,000 square foot center will provide administrative headquarters for the Sheriff's Department and all City departments. Constructic is scheduled for completion in late 1989. Day _ Regional Water C°oncervatiQR Prat mot'- i :vordination with. the County of San 11cmu,rdino, tite Cite of Rax cno Cucamonga and the G° — a City of Ontario, the Agency Ic constructing conservation project which will allevistp g a $44 Million 'water qu area, as well as recharge the area fdooclW3 conditions in the water supply. The Agency iwl'�vements associated *ith th development o£, the too ache r ` d Park, Additionally square foot Hbrar y� the Agency sraFi he onsuucting a 49,0€}0 ' y f'acilit i state- of-art cony user ' n Se per' : This facgit^ *he computer resources x`or local schools,,, , poiewial on -lines access e to and a media center. cMQ'ken t nd �„ q.; Tft;� Agency will provide the financing fox the construc3ion of the railroad underpass on M -Niken Avenue. t1 0'21 vary As identified in the Foothill Boulevard S rji Plan Implementation Prggram, the Agene n will be it�c financing mr�:hanis,ms for the construction of pu�Iic imp ©vements along Foothill Rou'evard. Fare Prole =M Fa �j M: The Agency supervising the cOlis'Fuction of a g y will be financing and facility and a traiating center. third fire station, a maintenance 0 _S-G EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EARKS AND RECREATION -&0 Alm EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT The Community Services Department has: e Surveyed and inventoried existing park and recreation . facilities and amenities within the City. 0 Surveyed potential Public and private rights -of -way and other properties which may b.a developed as park and recreation facilities. • Assessed the need for future facilities and uses for adult and youth sports. • Assessed the need for other parks, cultural and recreation �.menitiea and facilities (not related to adult and youth sports.) • Identified and researched specific sites within "floating designations'O of the General Plan and other park /facility acquisitions. ® Assermed all city school sport facilities for their potential use by the city recreation department for sport ua..e. The recent task force projactcd build -out at approximately 180,000 people in the year 2010 and addressed urbanization and the ability of the public sector to continue to provide recreation facilities and activitiem. It was determined that in order to meet the dem&ids of growth it will be increasingly more difficult for the public sector to provide appropriate, needed recreation opportunities. The City 1.148 to look for other sources (i.e., privato) to provide appropriate recreation facilities. To be successful, it may be necessary to develop incentives to promote this interest and assistance. As the population of the City grows and the characteristics of the population change the supply and location of rnrreaticn facilitic. and services must respond to adequately serve the residents of Rancho Cucamonga. Determining where additional growth will occur, along with the significant trends that will affect recreation use, is a key element in evaluating future needs. The above indicates the impact of population growth on community Parkland acreage dedication requirements assumes a dedication standard of 5 acres /1000 residents for Rancho Cucamonga. (Standard is referenced in City' ^rdancs 103 -B and attached.) The ilk five acre por 1000 residents Ls our goal. Also see copy of correspondence dated 3 -21 -84 explaining Senate Bill 213'; and our Park Fee Summary. G__691 Executive Summary Page Two Our department is to cc itiniially update the need for parka and facilities. Currently, there exists approximately 150 acres of improved community parkland and there will be a need to improve an additional 750 acmes of parkland by the year 2010. Of the 900 acres requited by this year 2010, 343 acres are already owned, and may be fully improved and operated by the City in 1991 (this Includes- 193 acres which are currently owned but not improved). This leaves 557 acres of community parkland to be acquired. PARK IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA '.TJRREI4'P PARK. • Bear Gulch Park • Beryl Park • Church Street Park • Coyote Canyon Park • Cucamonga /DQ%ens Trail Rest • sieritage Community Park • He "osa Park • Lions Park and Community Center 9 Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center • Red Hill Cormunity Park • Spruce Avenue Park • Victoria Groves Park • Windrows Park • West Greenway Park .PARRS IN LAND aCOTSTEMM • North last Community Park • Sports. Complex Park I![ LWOONSToTJ Pid. • Beryl Park, addition of tennis courts /picnic area/ volleyball • Lions Park, addition of tennis courts /picnic /patio area • Went Beryl Park • Olcl Town Park • �.:-_Sc Center /Public Safety Facility • Kenyon Park • Vintage Park • 141% Mission Park • Terra vista Park #5 Executive Summary Page Two • central Park • cree&sids Park e Cucamonga /Dements Confluence Park In addition to parks in Rancho Cucamonga the recent Task Force Committee examined future facilities to be incorporated within the park and recreation system. Using information gathered in the research, along with an understanding of the existing Z,evel of recreation service experienced by the residents, Facility Standards have been developed and _qre complied, in the written report. Facility Standards are sti,idards for the quantity of facilities which should be provided i�,,any point in. time, to meet the needs Mk residents. They are exp,J:Qsssd in a format of "one facility per so many thousand of population ". These Facility Standards will serve as guidelines for the level of service the City should p; Aar. >:;e as population grows. i -�j 3 14 FIMNCING ALTERNATIVES & - &q DATE TO: FROM: SUBJECT. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM February 24, 1989 Mayor: Gity Cuncil and City Manager Jarry E. FUlwood, Lirector of Resource Services FINANCING ALTIMNATIVnS AND ISSUES RELATED TO GROWTH MMAGEM14T The following documents are provided as additional information for your review of .Grp - °a: Management: a Issue Listing a Financing Alternatives o City Council Adapted Policy of Community Facilities and Assessment Dist Act Financings JHF:de (I - j El City of Rancho Cucamonga Resource Service Oepartment TS-9ue La tang SUBJECT: Growth M"(Oagement issues from a financial point of "View o Financing infrasts.uctures required for growth.. o Financing th during growthin"en ^nco of 13 rastructures constructed .. o Financing equipment and tools required to handle growth. o Handling s0rvicw.s generated by growth. j o Handling services g!eneratad by growth during a down turned economy. o Evaluating long term effeot on community for maintenance of landscape and other improvements. City of Rancho Cucamonga Resource Services Department Financing Vehicles SUBJECT: Financing Vehi.'1es currently being used Z,,�r Rancho Cucamonga: a Debt Financing: Community Facilit.es District Assessment District Certificates of participation and Various;Bonds o Credi. for Feesc Drainage Fees, Park. Fees, etc. t o Fay as ouato.- DevelOgment fuses are collected. When suffic',ent funds are available the project moves forward. o Reimbursement Agreements: When more than the developer's pro -rata fair share of improvements are constructed, he or she is later reimbursed as otGier development occurs. o maintenance District: Landscape and Lighting Districts are utilized for maintenance after improvements are ir- place. & - (�7 CITY OF CUT L PDECLARATION RANCHO TY ON OLICY SUBJECT: poLcy for use of Camrn�;41ity Facilities btstricts and Assessment b(strtCts to Finance public improvements i. UM -Me This policy is intended to serve as a general guideline for the City's use in reviewing prop�aseo assessment districts. These guidelines are purposefully Intended to be general and the City Mssrves the right on a case -by -case basis to determine the appropriateness of the use of assessment district or community facilities district financing. The City also reserves the right to select and directly supervise all engineering, financial, legal and other participating consultants. Financing instruments shall normally be used to finance the cost of constructing Public facilities for which there is a significant public need, , he City will also consider Whether the improvements to be financed have the concurrence of present and future owners of other benefiting property who will be assessed to pay for u improvements. Comrrrunity facilities districts will normally be used to finance drainage facilities n such "� —�a"� E�0'roE�en� where as assessment districts can be used or drainage, and other improvements as approved by City Council. The City will exercise a fiscally, conservative approach to the use of as;;es men districts and community facilities di�� financial standing and minimize smyfinancial nrisk tonthe kitty. ThetIndivi Individual cod impact of each assessment financing and the Cumulative impact of all assessme t fin3ncing's upon the City's credit and Its contingent liability will be carefully evaluated. A" expenses incurred In evaluating participating landowners whether or otes tch+expen Serena 9��bib8 to advanced or fundable out of a particular assessmen' dizirict. 1!. FlN..�NLtNG CR tR��s ►►, t• The Improvements should provide the broadest le public benefit Possible the residents within and Immediately adjacent to the sib ect aria, among 2• The public benefit should not be the to surrounding Properties. • The improvements should be perceived and easily recognizabie b owners as being a needed and necessary pr ®Percy possible, not only the properties within he procect area, to the greatest :extent � community as a whole i.e. p j but the surrounding 'i local economy, increased property vetues, public convenience, etc al revenues, } CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DECLARATION OF CITY COUNCIL POLICY Page 2 :., The project should be publicly financed only when it can be demonstrated that: a. There is a recognizable public need for the project. b. There exists a reasonable necessity to proceed now with the project. C. This is the only cost - effective means for financing the project, and other so,,irces of financing are either not feasible or available. d. The risks of default have been minimized to a reasonable level. e. The proponents have the financial and managerial resources sufficient to assure successful completion of the project. S. The project's financial benefits outweigh the gists of future, local governmental services. Ill. IzOLIQY t7g^LARATIOIi 4w J_" CITY OI` RANCkt3 CU AMONGA 01. Where, in the City's opinion the public facilities and services of a residential development represents a 'Ja ifn icant_ public benefit, this development will also be considered. 2. The proponents will provide written assurances to the City that all prospective " wers of property within the District shall receive full disclosure regarding the ciistdct's special tax levy. 3. Projects shall be at the stage where all the above criteria can, be adequately assessed as well as the proposed method of apportionment of any special tax and other fiscal Issues addressed. 4. All statements and materials related to the sale of District bonds shall emphasize that neither the faith and credit nor the taxing power of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is pledged to the payment of bond payments. 5. There is no advance payment by, or net cost to the City for processing assessment and /or community facilities districts. Expenses not chargeable to districts are borne by project proponent. Facilities shall be funded in accordance with the provisions of the Improvement Act of 1911, the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, and the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1932. 7. The assessment district bond. shall be issued In accordance with the 1911 oe 1915 Bond Acts. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA VECCARATION OF CITY COUNCIL PG7 iC`l page 3 8. In the event the acquisition provisions of they Municipal Irr Pmvement Acd of 19.13 are utilized, the Oita and project proponent shalt mutually agree upon the facilities to be Rcquired and the method of determining they con traction costs to Insure that Stature owners of the prQPQrty will be assessed ons fear on costs to incurred costs. 9• In an area of new development, property owners must demonstrate their financial ability to meet rail assessments and/or specl3t taxes e e onst boil their has taken place, tQ. There are no prior liens other than property ""acs act the property or, If they exist, they will net be overly burdensome to thj: property Owner$. a LA 0