Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989/03/22 - Agenda Packet0701-02 03- 22--89 PC Agenda R y 1- CITY OF RANKS CUCA.MO,' 'GA PLANNING COMMISSK)N AGENIR i WEDNESDAY MARCH 22, 1989 7 :00 p.m. LIONS PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASK LRNE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA L Piedge of Allegiance 10L Boll call Commissioner Blakesley Commissioner Er<erick Commissioner Chitioa Commissioner NjeNiei a Commissioner Tolstoy — . IB. Announcements IV. Approval of Minutes February 22, 1989 Mardh 8, 1989 V Consent Calendar The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non - controversial. Thcy iviZl be acted on by the Commission at one t rte without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. i A. VACATION OF A LANDSCAPE MP INTENANCE ACCESS EASEMENT --A request to vacate as Andscape maintenance easement between Wheaton Court and the Southern Pacific Railroad's right -of -way, located west of Milliken Avenue and north of Base Line Road - APN: 202 - 891 -38 do 39. B. TIME EXTENSION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86 -45 - AJA - A five lest Master floor of 15.59 acres and development of lots 2 and 3 of the Blaster Plan; ';ot 2 consisting of a 41,600 square foot industrial building on 2.32 acres and Lot 3 consisting of a 51,250 square! foot Industrial building on 2.72, acres of land, isi the Industrial Park District (Subarea 12), located on thk east side of Pittsburgh, north of 4th Street and south of 6thttr� t - APN: 229 -263 -3 d 4. a G. RESOLUTION OF DENIAL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DLS% 1CT AMENDMENT 87 -12 -'BURGUNDY CREEK., LTD. - A request to amend the Development District Map form Flood Control (FC) to Medium P ;nsity Residential (M) (8 -14 dwelling units per acre), which encompasses 1.61 ages, of tnd located on the west side of Carnelian Avenue, ,approewInately 1,000 feet south of Calle del Prado - APN. 207-022-GA'-1- (Continued from .March 8, 1989:) VL PabUz Hearings The foiltwing items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of ehe related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. " All such opinions shall be Rmited to 5 minutes per Individual for each project. D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 1308 - NU - A residential subdivision'of8 single amily lots on 2.47 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling �nits per acre), located at the niorth "t corner of Lemon Avenue and London Avenue - APN; 201- 251 -57 . 58. (Continued from January 25,198.) E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 9326 - THE PLIES DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - A subEision o 38.5 acres of land, into 28 parcels in the aene.,al is 0ustrial District (Subarea 8) of the industrial Specifie Plan and the Light Industrial District (Subarea 4) of the 'foQthUI Boulevard Specific plan, located north of Arrow Route, east of the I -15 Freeway, and south of Foothill Boidevard - APN: 229 - 021 -59. F. MIVIRONMIw TAr ASSESSMENT AND 'T'ENT'ATIVE PARCEL MA 11:12 - WAr^NER INSUL CO. A subdivision of 10 acres o land into 2 parcels in the Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial District (Subarea 9) of the Industrial Specifie Plan, located on the south side of 8th Street, west side of Rochester Avenue - APN: 229- 251 -10, 11, 12, 27, do 32, G. VARIANCE 88 -23 - WAGNER INSUL CO. - A request fora reduction of the minimum lot size rom 5 acres to 4 acres within the Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial District (Subarea 9) of the Industrial Specifie Plan, located on the south side of 8th Street, west side of Rochester Avenue - APN: 229 - 251 -10, 11, 12, 27, do 32. H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND '£ENTATIVE PARCEL MA 111117 0 �- N RDIC - A subdivision of 2.48 acres of land into S. parcels in the Very Low Residential Development Vetrtct, located at the southwest corner of Hermosa Avenue: viii Almlmd Street -APN: 1074- 051 -01. Associated with this is'I"ree Removal Permit No. 88 -13. I. MINOR ')EVELOPMENT REVIEW 89 -07 A. W. DAVILS - A request or expansion of a non - conforming use by adding 710 square feet of office space to an existing building and warehouse totaling 4,560 square feet on 3.82 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 3) of the Industrial Specific Plar.,:located on the southeast corner of 9th Street and Helms Avenue - APN: 209- 031 -53 & 54. J. MODIFICATION TO BESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 13820 D VCAL - A request to change a previously approved tract Nap from a one -rot subdivision to a five -lot subdivision f.- )r the development of 265 condominium units on 18.9 acres of land in the Medium -High Residential District (14 -24 dwelling units per acre), located east of Haven Avenue on '.tie south side of Lemon Avenue - APN: 201 - 27149., K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 14011 - PANNON DE CN > A residential subdivision and design review of 48 single amily lots on 9.2 acres of land in the Low - Medium Residential District (4 -8 dwelling units per acre), located at the southeast corner of Lemon Avenue and London Avenue APN: 201 - 252 -21 do 22. Associated with this is Tree Removal Permit No. 89-12. " L. ENVIRONMENTAL AM;" 3MENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88 -0 Hc?1. a ZA TIME - A request to establish ar. arcade within a restaurant located at the southr ast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hellman Avenue - APN: 205- 261 -25 &28. VIL Old Business M. SAPPHIRE TRAIL Review of proposed community trail improvements on the west sidle of Sapphire Street, south or Banyan Street. VIII. New Busl24as N. DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13748 - GPIFFIN Ht�MT_S_- The design review of building elevations acid deta)led site plan for a previously approved Tentative Tract Map consisting of 102 single famiig lots on 28.8 acres df land in the Low Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located north of Highland, west of Milliken - APN: 201 - 271: -55. O. DESIGN REVIEW FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87 -04 - GREUBEL The design review of a se -serve edr wash, Tube shop, and auto detail shop, on 3.8 acres, of land within the Neighborhood Commercial District, located at thi southwest corner of Haven and Lemon - APA: 201 - 262 -48. IX. Commission EusinQss i S. Public Cor' *nts This is tir to and glace for the general public to address the Commis9 Rn. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already/ ,ppedr on this agenda. XL Adjt3mment The Planning Commission has adopted Administnative,Regulations that set an fit p.m. adjournment tune. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission Adjourned to 3/30/83 workshoL at 4:00 pm at Rancho r.4camonga Neighborhood Center to discuss EtiwAnda North and an initial furl jury presentation for Awards of Design Excellence grogram. Q ONT40114 IYOSSMA051m ApWo*T CFrY OF RANCHO CVCR El DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: I, Ii. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM0NGA STAFF REPORT Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission. William J. Silva, Deputy City Engirser Gary H. Sheu, Assistant Civil Engineer Wheaton Court and the Southern Pacific Railroad's right -of- way, located west of Milliken Avenue and north of Base Line Road (APH 2202- 891 -38 and 39) BACKGROUNDfANALYSIS: The City has received a request from two property owners on Wheaton Court located west of Milliken Avenue and north of Base Line Road, to vacate an unused Landscape Maintenance Access Easement. The Landscape Maintenance Access Easement was dedicated to the City on. Tract Map 13050 which was approved by City Council en August 6, 1986, to be used for access to the landscaped area along the Southern Pacific Railroad's right -of -way. Two additional accesses to the landscaped area have been provided in close proximity which results in the subject easement being unnecessari. The subject access has never been iaprovad, and currently there is a wail between the access easement and the Southern Pacific Railroads right -of -way. The owners of the property that this easement crosses have requested that the easement now be vacated. RECOMMENDATION -. Staff recoeoads that the Planning Commission make the finding that the vacation of the landscape maintenance access easement conforms with the General Pian. This finding will be forwarded to the City Council for further processing and final approval. RespectNTly submitted, William J. Silva, P.E. Deputy City Engineer GHS:ly ITEM A -- .. 4I EXHIBIT 'A' 300 -0100 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF ACCESS BASEMENT` SH: CFr 7/2.0/88 WITHIN TRACT NO. 13060 (TO BE QUIT — CLAIMED) THAT PORTION OF A 15.00 FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ACCESS EASEMENT DEDICATED AND ACCEPTED BY THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LYING WITHIN THE EASTERLY 7.50 FEET OF LOT 10 OF TRACT NO. 13050 PAR DAP RECORDED IN BOOK 192 , PAGES 62 THROUGH 65 'INCLUSIVE OF MAP BOOKS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER 7F SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, STATE OF CALXFORNIA. ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE IN PART HEREOF IS A SKETCH ENTITLED "EXHIBIT B". THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREIAARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION. Y LKER, L.S. 4463 FA RAND SAx s LIC E EXPIRES 9/30/89. qw tio. ,s C, •I I. a J, u 7. w w T W de qq r/1 v (ti,,,,I• Tom] +' 19 — l J y C • e 0 o� 9.% O 161 G.-•� T � .0 'C9 � � V O� suj O �N `y Q <;3 i9. Q a i-I W WC I �EGF1?1ED RECEIVED JUN 2$ 1998 4jr( QF RAWM1 OUCA909U 6"KE404 DIVISION June 16, 1988 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Plannivj & Engineering Departments Rancho Cucamonga. CA 01701 To 'Whoa It May Concern: Please accept this letter as our Joint vequest to have easement betweep Lot 10-and Lot 11 of Tract 130017 vacated., e understand the city no longer requires this ares for LOCOS* VO maintain this slope to the south of our black wall. Respectfully, Mich el R. B -9--Lf l " �ot II :bra A= $iveaas . 10 "04 Lookard C El 11 A ifs /'�4RT[T AL[ b A i�Tf4CTA. rTTA n- A 91r^ATf1 A .+rr r�^tva va.s.�.rv�al- ST"F' REPORT ATE: March 22, 1989 TO: Cha rman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Bruce Abbott, Associate Planner Gu'"WQA O O SUBJrr.T: 'TIME EX'I NSTON FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86 -45 AJA A five lot Mas er Plan of acres and d eve opmen o ots 2 and 3 of the Master Plan; Lot 2 consisting of a 41,600 square foot industrial building on 2.32 acres and Lot 3 consisting of a 51,250 square foot industrial building on 2.7 acres of land in the Industrial Park District ( ^,:barea 12), located on the east side of Pittsburgh, north of 4th Street and south of 6th Street - APN: 229 -262 -3 & 4. 1. BACKGROUND: This project was originally approved by the Planning ommmiss o -on Marco 25, 1987. Building plan check approval for Buildings No. 2 and 3 expired on November 25, 1988. The two-year approval for Development Review 86 -45 will expire on March 25, 1989. Correspondi ly, the applicants are requesting time in order to resubmit plans to the Building & Safety Division for plan check approval and building permits before the design review approval expires. The Planning Commission may grant up to 3 years of extension, in 12 -month increments. II. ANALYSIS: The project is consistent with the Industrial Specific Plan and the General Plan. The project will not be detrimental to the adjacent properties or cause significant environmental impacts. The proposed site plan and building design, together with the previously recommended conditions, are in compliance with the Industrial Area Specific Plan and City standards. Should the applicant propose any changes to the approved plans, a :modification to the development review would be required. III. RECOMRWATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Ore —E-he extension for Development Review 86 -45 for one year. 1977 ITZM B PLX 3ING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT RE: TIME EXTENSION /DR 85 -45 - AJA March 22, 1989 Page 2 ResapeVIY s tq£ id, rad City Pi her BB :BA:ko Attachments: Letter from Applicant Exhibit "A" - March 25, 1987 Planning Commission Staff Report Resolution No. 87 -44 Resolution of Approval is �1 T a Mission Laced company February 14, 1989 Mr. Chris Westman City of Ranch] Cucamonga Planning Dept. 9320 Baseline Rd. Suite C Rancho CucaLQ.ga_ CA 91 30 SUBJECT: Time Extension. for Approved Project DR t16 -45 Tear Mr. Westman: Please extend pNanning approval for the referenced project for a period of ono year. We have enclosed the extension fee -�f $62. Sincerely, , ohn R. Richards Manager, Engineering and construction JRR. I : ns 1 150 West Central Avenue, Suite D • Brea, Caiitemia 92x;21 . Telephone (714) 671-0466 -7 CITY OF RANCI?0 CUCAMONG9. STAFF REPORT DATE: Ma - -h 25, 1987 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Debra Meier, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT 'REVIFW 86 -45 - A A - The review of' -a tive of Masier Plan of acres and' development of lots 2 and 3 of the Master Plan. Lot 2 consisting of a 41•,500 square foot industrial building on 2.36 acres and Lot 3 consisting of a 51,250 square foot industrial building on 2.77 acres of land all within the Industrial Park District (Subarea 12), located on the east -`de of Pittsburgh Avenue south of 6th Street - APN 229- 203-3, 4. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a five lot Master Plan, along With to FI& and Building Elevations of Lots: 2 and 3. B. Surroundirg Land Use and Zonin : North - Existing industrial acilitie�;; Industrial Specific Plan Subarea 11 South Vineyard; Industrial Specific Plan Subarea 12 East - Vineyard; industrial Specific Flan Subarea 11 West - A master planned R & 0 complex, Phase I under construction; Industrial Specific Plan Subarea 12. C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Indus- tria-l7Park Borth - General Industrial South - Industrial Park East - General Industrial Best - Industrial Park 0. Site Characteristics The majority of the site is still used as a vineyard, t e vineyaras will remain until each lnt is developed. Directly across Pittsburgh Avenue is the Bixby Ranch Master Plan with Phase I under construction. Curb and gutter exist on Pittsburgh, and parkway developement will occur with the de��elopement of each lot of the Master Plan. lo� y ct,t.3t�.. ITEM R PLANNING COMMISF- '! STAFF REPORT OR 86 -45 - AAA March 25, 1987 Page 2 F. Parkirq Calzulations: Type of Square Use Foota - Lot 2 Office 4,160 Manufacturing 12,750 Warehouse 24,460 Total Lot 3 Office 5,350 Manufacturing 16,050 Warehouse 29,850 Total II. ANALYSIS: No. Of Parking Spaces Ratio Required 1/250 17 1/500 26 1/1004 1st 20,000 sf 22 1/2000 2nd 20,000 sf �d 1/250 21 1/500 32 1/1000 1st 20,000 sf 25 112000 2nd 20,000 sf FV No. Of Spaces Provided 97 107 A. General: The Master Plan area consists of five lots aling the ease Me of Pittsburgh Avenue south of 6th Street. Lot 1 is currently under construction with a 58,500 square foot industrial building. Lots 2 and 3 are being reviewed for approval with this application while Lots 4 and 5 are intended for future development and will be reviewed and approved through future development review applications. The eastern boundary of the Master Plan will became the border between the Industrial Park District "Subarea 12i1 and the 6enerr Industrial District "Subarea 110. a PLANNING COWISF - -4 5TAFp REPORT OR 86 -45 - AJA March 25, 1987 Page 3 El B. Design Comittee: The Comwittee, (Chitiea Buller) n r.Tai y rev.ewe a project on February 14, 1987, noting the following concerns: 1. Lunch courts should be provided with appropriate amenities and should be separated and distinct from the entry plazas. 2. The C(x=ittee expressed a concern that certain driveways entrys lacked any kind of interest or statement white others are unbalanced with large statments oo only one side. 3. Variation in the vertical building plane woul -J be desirable, but set; d d be compatible with concept of the Bixby Master Plan which is present"y under construction on the west side ow' Pittsburgh. 4. The master planning of t ks parcel should focus on the Pittsburgh streetscape, in part, .oar, variation in building setback parkway design cimpatible with the Bixby Master Plan concep... 5. The eastevn portion of this vlock is designated a General Industrial District (Subarea 11) and should be Master Planned at some future date. Plowever, the subattat bounu—,*y line should be a prolongation of the east property line of Lot 1 southerly to the proposed street and shared access should be provided frov the g- oposed street between tht two subarou at Lot S. The following rivisions to xhe project ware later reviewed and approved by the CoW ttee on March 5, 1987L 1. Lunch courts are provided that will include shade trees and appropriate hapdscape &uffl ties. 2. Project entrys have been re- orientated, clustering entry plazas separate from loading zones and clipping the building corners at less prominent entrys for landscape nodes.. 3. Variation to the streetscape is provided by bringing buildings on Lots 3 and 5 closer to the street frontage. s► E] E PLIWNS COMHISS -4�l STAFF REPORT DR 6645 - AJA March 25, 1957 Pa„ 4 C. 'reci:nicai Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee has revIewed tne project- a" nn. etermined that it is consistent with applicaole standards and ordinances, D. Environmental Assessment: Upon review of Part l of the Init;„o u y and comp a on o "art 2 of the Environmental Checklist, staff has found no signal lnt impacts related to the developoent of the proposed Master Plan. III. FACTS FOR FINDIN GS: This project is consistent w th the Industrial pec c an an :ze ventral rlaro. The project will not be detrimental to the adjacent properties or cause significant environmental impacts. In addition, the pr posed stZ ;iT-m and building design, together with the recommended conditions, are in compliance with the Industrial Area Specific Plana and City Standards. IV. RECOMtMENDATInN: Staff recoawends approval of Deir,eoqment Revier 35-45 raugW- the adoption of the attached Resolution and Conditions of Approval and issuance of a Negative Declaration, Res tfully s d, Brad Bulj4er City Planner B$?DM:ser Attachments: Exhibit IV - Location Map Exhibit "SO - Master Plan Exhibit °C° - Conceptual Landscape Alan Exhibit "C" - Enlarged Details Exhibit °1E" - Site Plan for Lots 2 and 3 Exhibit 'F" - Building Elevations Lot 2 Exhibit '6® — Building Elevations _lot 3 Resolution of Approval with Conditions 1i No IrrH CITY Or rrr.\l i+�° PLANNING DIV[ MN EXHIMP-94-SCALD I fi t� t I 6 4 r �i r' 7AP"Y we r om tv :=a 'g&W t wpu t4 nr Aw yam v, su+c 2 Ol 10.+,TO�V. lb3K 3 t 544 .. tt, txaf. �p Of ' Ita, /p t1, tr /OC a tr.paui ��e �u utwta. zra d u m art r Av. tGTM IrRIas6R AN A+Jt LtRMaah +Ap ♦i CITY Cif. RANCHO CUCAINJONLGA PLANNING Dl' %I MOQ>I 0 1� NORTH LEGEND THEME T:;==S EVERGSPEEN TREES T-J0F G=:J14000iEA DROUGHT TOLERANT FLOWERING GROUNDCOVEz EVERGREEN TREA (VERTICAL ACCEN PLANT 4ALEME M2 Pita PLAIMM -------------- CITY Of. RAINCHO CUCANIONGA PLANNING DIVISM (6-18 11 1:3 nau MlrrK A :;40 1 Triull EXHIMT- SCAM A. -71 ,tTRY A (10 CITY Or. RAI 'CH O CUC bit ION GA PLANNING DINIMN R>-)l • VOL. m I WIN A, im"Al NORTH I 1 I i c 1 4. X 1 ARE it nR Rot TA;EJfT'YAl Nd� ANb41LLA�i7T�M11! R aM! - 4 L`-Ci= KLM - . Cf3y�' II l TAMl AT1ON • Li _ GROSS SITS AREA a a..�. vn A)KI ' 'Lo 3 W SITS AREA a am rnA)w ( (YJY }01)Ap yVILOWO AREA a a)ar IYN ) )IJY}W.Y IAROOCARE AREA w urY YOIN . .l)Y rOA Y1 MMDECAAF AREA I IYr pw V Vw } /UY W� SWcvftO A AREA �Awy A AMA ft." G6 51' 1 1((YY I WIC ' YAREROVAE IAlwM W (�yy W !""' . TOTAL ! .I w r w )1 ) )Im r 10 IM ARE it nR Rot TA;EJfT'YAl Nd� ANb41LLA�i7T�M11! R aM! f� l CITY or RANCHO CUCANIO. NGA PLANNING DIVISiCXN r ((�� 1EXHIMD SCALE: e-- jal-- 2 E V V NORTH El i . Cf3y�' II l • Li _ W� f� l CITY or RANCHO CUCANIO. NGA PLANNING DIVISiCXN r ((�� 1EXHIMD SCALE: e-- jal-- 2 E V V NORTH El Ell - -- -L'. NORTH .oaowc saa�ma 'EAST. gp SOUTH CITY OI - rr�,��t '�► . 8 -1`�3 NORTH SOUTH •YL�et t0e�i_a t � t EAST CITY OF RANCHO CUCAtijoxLGA INNING tai %IMM 6— p f LIN E V No irrH RESOLUTION NO. 87 -44 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVI €W NO. 86 -45 LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF PITTSBURGH AVENUE SOUTH OF 6TH STREET IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT APN 229- 263 -3, 4. WHEREAS, on the 14th days of January, 1987, a, complete application was filed by Gilbert Aja and ".sz,ciates for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 25ty day of March, 1387, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meetiig to consider the above - described project. follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the RG-n'0 Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as SECTION 11: That the Following can he met: 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and 2. That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code andrthe Industrial Specific Plan and the purposes of that district in which the site is located; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Cade and the Industrial Specific Plan; a,ad 4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the Public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: That this project will !at create adverse impacts on the environmen a Ai: a Negative Declaration is issued on March 25, 1987. SE ION 3= That Development Review No. 86 -45 is approved subject to the following-conditions and attached Standard Conditions: Planning Division Master Plan: 1. The Master Site and landscape plates are approved in concept only. Development of each lot shall require (' separate Development Review application and l approval. PLANNING COMMISSION 'SOLUTION N0. OR 86 -45 - Aja March 2 3, 1987 Page 2 2. The subarea boundary line between Subarea 11 and 12 shall be a prolongation of the east property Tine of Lot 1 to the proposed street. Th2r -afore, a lot line adjustment is necessary for the southern portion of the existing property line. The lot line adjustment shall be accomp7ished prior to issuance of auilding permits. Lots 2 and 3: 3. Pedestrian amenities sficN as raised seating, benches, planters and ot`Ier appropriate street furniture shall be provided within plaza areas. Details shall be provided on final landscape plans and submitted for Planning 61 vision approval prior to issuance of building permits. 4. The lunch courts shad' be screened from loading and t,ackinC actirvty by use of low profile walls or shrubs. Engineering Division 1. The proposed east /wasp street located' at the south property line shall be constructed as a standard half -width street with a minimum 26 foot pavement width within a 40 foot dedication. 2. The missing street improvements along Pittsburgh and the proposed east /west street may be deferred until development of the adjacent frontage if secured by a lien agreement. APPROVED #= ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 1967. PLANNING CD.u'7IA80J THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOWA BY:- ATTEST: I, Brad &idler, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the ^c4Y of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Comeission held on the 25th day of March, 1987„ by the following vote -to -wit: DYES: COMMISSIONERS% TOLSTOY, MCNIEL, CHITIEA, BARKER, EMERICK NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: C04 SSIONERS: NONE 10-1 I or ra sL$�_orr� p s�sri g °o �r •mot w'!«g6.•�Y.N Z ^p�p • {Ly =7 Y�Y'` _MYNI! fA` wSOU „Ly ULLOd Sm v . r q$L�� � � i� Zai `as 7i _ Y 1;+z :g3 Sgrk; W gg"` _ `et� V � 7• t i. Y W e YO B c g�Q3l��a$ ok1�S g'�8 L`-Y- r'w' C} N O_ *yg2•Y �/11°1S96�1 Y�{V °O -s .-0a. •N `QR `�pC��Y@ ••�+.E...q 'R OO- ..+.,YM xw_ : =y. V.Y. �ri '.Z' °$. $E+O �Ww ate: o i+r[� ca. a�1 b.IN �N �2 �E-2 .,b Gil ffif q ,,ppy Lr .g ���gYY.�G'O�p�� ° •g9 ►:F �:� Nsiyag� sa�i ; St ru n 1 yy�� C N �« �sN��Yy•—w it ,n � .ia� • � »� � »f ':oe aaYYgo i f •-*:� S •� � ��33 ��Q � �OM �•jgji� ^�Y �� s ' w L Q d =� Ce�.gr NON I ` ii CTi [ r l Ai .��.� ` O `q Qga r- oi p ve��Srcey.. 1 I u v Q CL °I Sg +a 22 q •4 O aY Ut r .6 °».S ch' = =ra 'o n `o c oq$ bb "h ASS• �� p{`O. 0 S+z i'Zg L H D.� al g � C C ++- �O wiii �C � i 66it`i yti 6a i! � M � w � tl� G c:sss Y� L HM st2- S° O Ki° o �aw Y. 1-M G w s a U 0 ti M $ ono` iM -0S! a d $` IL �& w y ♦W CSC "r NN tl.CZ �>Ufill IoW �d 1N b 1c VI�tC! 51 � 3 oL'c N O OY �L M � S u its �A �• ri � V 6N CO "N �tl� �Y 9w �(LC40 �df Ntl�r> M-023 r4LC Vy qpp'. L1MtlY. V.M3 4.� •�•tl YL ,Nr l p�w O �p S y goy~ wm Vu Yd'tl °L � �Yp CJ N O O 6 4D�CY*tl ON >�M� ZIN.— W •fie!! .'+„� 1 i OJ t 11 w • El C 9 q r .6 W]Ytl Y 'o n `o p{`O. 0 N�q L M�44R D.� al Ob wiii �C � i 66it`i yti O u aaaYpfff: i! � M � w � a r co ^ pG6� CC Y r g. qA 2 -_ sJ Y.tl i13 y ° ��C ref L• �tlC} 60 L44 ScSi}�YL ~ V■ Y G t Ltl =Y,..p y9i`� y@ yp.. CqC �°n dQ + C c. ws�3. `z `�A ,Nr l p�w O �p S y goy~ wm Vu Yd'tl °L � �Yp CJ N O O 6 4D�CY*tl ON >�M� ZIN.— W •fie!! .'+„� 1 i OJ t 11 w • El C �«j. • DOT CO, � Od OO:Stil:�gS �S�W C Qbtltl C ^OJcc�� • �•{�. U$ W 1� NA � ^��.r 0 ~4y` Z t CGOi9 V 1 if a •5'° _�,�� Y nt'y, U�4'm. ®m`$ ^a; A, ��i Cwo�f os- .oiCiva rsii rd'QSStd .r�F w�..y� =Y� ��'�gN O' O• Oi RB. ua0 ��O w.r SOV �p�ii�j�. •t} Y.p qd�w n OSt.tl Ok•sr S �S ilk Sdw pwgaYiHH� G zj', N C U �d$i� 'oiQ1° 3'E' uM.p �^ wowoc�$G•�"}o�,� +�A «3w �� ".pay Cl ^wV^ •°9 �^ • Y w'`� 6. °® ng � mN [39`� i apt Yu 40 C a 0 �-, 1 �: °w ��PpQ• &$ =fir wy "ea p L9rp nij N�w�rti d� yO�r�7�w�1 lyy�i ^w0- °,��eS yOY�QC ■G� JiVNPY" we�Mtl Y �wn tgiYS � • Wtbi ��• yV� S �NnM p ai pyp �gY^�aaay. ex�Ofip �Y�' OP „H N�sy9q S' CO���YY�a`M� � �'SwMS V� yq�• qV oq �~ � ^wq °q wwpF`��Y ^�. �C•lib�� �O +` qN�S M L�Q ��00 ��lp C4C �Y •�9 N �;�i y�{C. ~ w� _� $o'^ `o^ `o.. ao.. •� .a maw «�•..,�,,'H � y aw'� ^� ..w q'q• S• %w� 1 NSF ^oY 91 r 2 �Y oa+wY NS H�N CMS t'M 3H0 �H.¢j <NY •'^ ? >C� b O OL y•YT 6. Iy�y (� a-IL qq .. •i� Mai• YSTI, JA ^�. qQo. H `wr .•� ^' Y .�_-,y ±p ^���$!qq •1i P.��.�b MG QY�aa�y. way °' �•as " +. i� Yws '�� ps'.°s.�swaMMq. �y! ��Y Y 04•' + >q �OA ^t! 4V�V �9.ta'LS� EQ °w a�5 H ^s3� a» aim+ .wo,$ uZ' =u aqr :MM`a V I tam' $ aQ� M M` i° iHUaci °� p .^aQa aq�C Y YC= �•'a. gib '� Cws O' L PN 6CM— `�yw 'J v Z.2 ZM Cq qYq� M�«_ gaSq w •H�fS`� s•.v. °� vsai y 7,Cw�a qw• a �$ ay u6♦aL <V.Mo ���� T �aM HdM <k8 <.a l�OwwO q;0� •KM�i WL1�M V~IYv 4 g� Mc h//. {V S'�f Nay R�� 2w09 •I�V D V N <[ p an j= h se • .D+tG ►v yi. tl .i L O. iG C ♦r. y �pMwZtl 4 SI GV rK .yy w �y vy Uba1 R. • a �. r ya wwti �Yy[ -is I; O'J� Ci 'alhyUi Mz�gy4 U4- As .IJ xw Vd U�pD.r a' � dfyS 4.pV .Q N.wi�U gQjy 60.. pG�w r NL� w rU Sr iqT a3�i. a O q pN M a. b. 0 il.p A u. L 9 t a J Y L. if is 4MN .0 Cl� N�wMW. Vqr w C�. Op PS N�w Y`r 4. PAN V O � tl � v fit DwQ pLaM 6 V3 Y aii Y� �ee����pff �N �� V.V4w i#rY iii Nf.". .4. X y'ii"�g g4s� m.�Qa m�D aS y�f g# .ww qo3 c'a°sp 3 �°aL.#rn $ Ag. i St F3�u �m � N aCN C U ti a b 4 E�w� • ti 00 OG O o+ 4 � # CCw yroQN n4 w r o -'..Cr. ryi G a M ub E al •rV+V A� MCy' tiW J M ycC%C�� �~S pn yL DA B -07y aaM . VSS aQ aL.i ose #D ® Za ,�- ta S -aim. Z--- �q k g8pQrLrt`i]_4Q _y an`�C 9 Vs.L b . CC M Lpn w oil w dt� tp,�• p.M 4Mtl6y,� pVw9 w.ZL 5° X01 #w `aae Y f� Dr a wM Xra:�p Di � C;M H vta �i°R Mal n % �t D .� 2z I ap�g! 91K L b. rOS� fp.\. A J: yY yy #y vy i .^ .r uv °q` sr .`�s ��$ al.l. - Eplr �Lt V 01 G ate& `� 6:1 M.3 w^➢w ��M1w o. laii xNti R u `p VVGtltn w ems. me=t Av CN ° ;A C G ��s G > r� D.�'. VHt 3.32 X 4 Y Y r w tl � RT C C a'CS ti = , A w x.N.. O � ## tl =Z 93 &-- B-.a 3 G , g=aL. rR. °•.°'Nc as ae ^r "' $'� - •fRic ppn v 4•M.$iVw NM 'Jr \S �V CY COL ba t :t ZAL. �i 0 `n ' F�SrO ��b �S6 £wp� � •!G � yC VOOC G .sA Si Vi S-4 Q S� $i S + a.V O tea py +a� 4-1 YY V. q.•q G d M_R. 9 3 Y G6 � V L'��Cf qp,L dM O ti. O D �yQ . VC e.� L .2 ��G •� v +1tlM �:� O O � o� DL 4 — �y �CC YO uB ((;� Y W ■ ■@@ F b y oY �. 'B. 5en`a ='$ S--% �j7�p0 : avY1a: �V yO,� a Yye YO�VR oY _L� aOO`,OT2C y .rib Ptl y , a0 � �: .J w+JC C` 2. e Sir$ S + � Y� °°- YYg.Y®. p ^r •O�s `i N +� �Vb LV `L. t ^$ r c { in ? tea j 88 ��a &: SrA3� +ac o R¢p Lai x :p 006 �V ay+�Y ZN Vyy O. tl�Y L� K 4Ltl� d'� � I W J CA O� C LT YGG d PU`V�A� q0 yP Ag� a O Y6p, \yr 4. t4.e ^�. .. 12 Ao Sis -- 9 0 YN . R Y -R= a OO�w � „O`tli tl 4 •. _� ri ra� �� m �w�e� s °Oyci� �°.r�$ °u fi.o .�. Z. w'ew0, °'6 eo..•i.`,$ e g�+� Qca. pzz `n L, Z 4Q ce�r •YC' -co .�V ate i o� .. ..Oq�$ `VEI tl1� O,V 27.Y C O O - 4 B R uyGC VON+ �,+0 tl0.'�F1 ^L lMb9 W YY O. L1� 1i3 !� <I D d H CY L- 0 co to �S �t .r r I lt) 1 j� flab Ng- yY• t� f! �wm M� N ¢� b Qu rt SAN Ab uC �€-,$ e> ga yr Yg Qp4' rn 0.Y i _a C� bp MV g6 �yT �t �q3�'•» :g` sgi'gg`di3v Y'e' •�` S"•'g' ,g ;jyY v .' alb- Sze ICY .5�� iao ae �.�i• aK ;�° :iP ""° qr.. ==6115 aC >p Y ax r. _ray Ora NO iaar Kci S� W�p L L a+tr� as mu Y tq a- i <O gVi �.0 r}}�� If air of N t rY i A ,t lb, Is uil IN VENli III q.�r.EYE cM. '^ M� � 11 4E j r K y er 1 0 L CL. Ul Y ea Y O six i -e a 4 C. _ � g� isa•, _• y�A�1 Z� e =gig A � c__� to "w r p� .6 aQUa �s �v. .� � uo p 0 A Q^ P • V 1 �^ 9 LpD sY �Sgr .eWO- as Y w 4 3g3 t Y Z� e =gig A � �S "w $g ssww �v. .� i i 2 Z r c�'r► r.-U s ul aq • o!� g5 A «�.�� pV •Ntl c A p ��cy asa Y° n g� pq pJ emu° yc iwvw .IA n +a-a Ca _ ~6 ». Y'Y �l 14 CY L O C 4 1 yy wsY Z� e =gig i E� Vq is $g ssww c A p ��cy asa Y° n g� w pJ emu° yc .IA i�F «r y• Y'Y 4a `: E Miicz RESOLUTION NO. is A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANN14 C"ISSIOt`I OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA%i)NGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 86-45 LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF PITTSBURGH AVENUE, SOUTH OF 6TH STREET IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 2'0- 263 -3 & 4. WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extension for the above- described project, pursuant to Section 17.02.100; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above - described industrial park development. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following 'gs: A. That prey, ,kiling economic conditions have caused a distressed market climate for. development of the project. D. That current economic., marketing, and inventory conditions make it unreasonable to develop the project at this time. C. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent of the Development Code. D. That the granting of said time extension will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a time a %tens off: Pro e t Applicant Uairation Old 86-45 Gilbert Aja March 25, 1990 Associates L 16 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. RE: TIME EXTENSION /CSR 86 -45 - AJA March 22, 1989 Page 2 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF MARCH 1969. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: .arry T. WRIel. Chairman ATTEST: srao Buller, Secretary I, Brad Busier, Secretary of the Planning Coapission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, dry hereby Certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly-and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of March, 1989, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMSSIONERS: ABSENT: COK41SSIONERS: Ir 1. Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga 'Rat Development District Amendment 87-^1 .Burgundy Creek IOTA, At the last Planning Commission meeting of March 8, 1989, the above matter came before the Commiss *.on. The Commission expressed same concerns, not being apprised of the total project: prop.osed, and moved to a -ny. Apparently a misunderstanding on our part resulted in the denial after the Commission offered us the option of a continuance to ,enable us to bring a complete development package before the Commissions For two- past year we have been working with various City staff members of the Planning Division, she kngineerinq Division, the Traffic Division, etc. to design a quality project for this site. We are a small group, several of which are residents of Rancho Cucamonga and we have spett a great deal of money on thin project. tie respectfuI17 request thc.'Commission to crest us a continuance so that tie nay bring back to the Commission a total project package that will address any and all concerns you may Lave, Our development package is very close to being ready for submi.ss^ cn. Thank you for your consideration, Stan Scates and Bill Nix -- �—�- -- CITE' OF RANCHO CUCA NONGA CgCAO STAFF REPORT a o U DATE; mar4h 22s 1989 M77 TO: .nairman and Mambers of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner � BY: rin-iv 'torris, Assistant Planner SUBJECT, ENVIRONMENTAL. ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT amend" "e'veTopmenl s r c p from and Control (FC) € to Medium Density Residential (8 -I4 belting units per acres which encompasses 1.61 acres of land locatee on the �' crest side of Carnelian Avenue, approximately 1,10o feet south of Calle Del Prado - APR-. 207.o22 -64. On March 8, 1989, the Planning Commission reviewed this item and f recommended that it be denied .without prejudice. Attached for your r information is the previous staff report and fte Resolution of Denial. Respe lly su d, ra r City Planner BB:CH:mlg Attachrentss Staff Report Resolution of Denial s��M C ----�- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 8, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FRONT: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Cindy Norris, Assistant Planner C�'CA`Mp� l 1977 J SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL _ ASSESSMENT _ n_,� DEVELCI?RM DISTRICT fiMMUMMI 01-1C - DUKULINUT LALLG, LIU. - A requpsx to ar. n a eve opmten s r cf�-% --p- r—= --Mood Control (FC) to Medium Density Residential (M) (8 -14 dwelling units per acre), which encompasses 1.61 acres of land Iocated on the west side of Carnelian Avenue, approximately 1,000 feet south of Calle Del Prado - LIN: 207- 022 -64. I. PROJECT MM SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval oV a Development District ar at�ram`""FToad Control to Medium Density Residential. B. Surroundina Land Use and Zoning: North = Existing single family (proposed multi- family Tentative Tract 14253); Medium Density Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre). South - Vacant; Flood Control East - Existing single family; Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre). West - Flood Control Chanrnll and existing single family; Flood Control and Li. Cansity Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acrd). C. General Plan �esigna_tions- fro ccr. 3Y% — Medium uensi ty Residential (9 -14 dwelling units per acre) iiorM - Miedium Density Residential (0-14 dwelling units per acre) South < Flood Control East - Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre with a Floating park designation). Hest - Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) 0. Site Characteristics: The subject site is vacant with the excep ono a I an scaped parkway of Eucalyptus trees and ITEE4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ODA 87 -12 - BURGUNDY CREEK, LTD. March 8, 1989 Page 2 shrubs directly adjacent to the existing curb and Flood Control Channel along Carri_%_'_in Avenue. E. Surrounding Land Use: Directly north are three (3) existing o e� Tyr s�g,ds rare y ones which are to be removed as part of the proposed development for Tentative Tract 14263. north of this is an existing water tank and approximately Tour (4) single family homes. The area north of these homes has been developed with multi - family units. East of Carnelian are existing single family horses which rear onto the subject site, while to the west are existing single Racily homes separated from the subject property by the San Bernardino County Flood Control Channel, (approximately 160 -200 feet), (Exhibit "C "). II. ANALYSIS: The requested amendment proposes a change in the 01sstrric - Designation from Flood Control to (Medium Residentir . The Cucamonga County dater District has declared the subject property to be surplus because Cucamonga Creek Channel improvements eliminated flood hazard. In addition, the property has contiguous parcels to the north which are zonc-d Wdium Density Residential and is separated from existing lower density areas to the east by secondary arterial (Carnelian Avenue) and to the west by the San Bernardino County Flood Control Channel. (Exhibit The General Plan has been interpreted to include the subject parcel as a logical extension of the Mediums Density Residential Designation. Therefore, a change in the Development District Designation from flood Control to Medium Density would bring the zoning into conformance with the General Plan as eequired by State law. In additions to this Developmert district Awandmvat request, the applicant is currently procetsi�: a total rtsido'.itial 0velopment dest review application, sing optional standards under Medium Dens ty Residential, from approximately 42 condominium units (Tentative Tract 14263) which encompass to subject parcel and the om, directly to the north. Attachea is s Conceptual Site Plan illustriting the potential site development (Exhibit "D "). III. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSWtENT: Parts I and II of the Enviroresental checklist nave been-completed. Staff has determined that no significant environmental impacts will be created as a result of the proposed amendment. It is anticipated that any issue of acoustical impacts will be successfully mitigated at the project ltoel. An acoustical report has been prepared which recommends sound barrier attenuation for exterior patios and recreational areas. An arborist`s report shall be prepared in conjunction with PLANNIN9 CCHMISSION STAFF REPORT ODA 87-199 - BURGUNDY CREEK, LTD. March 8, 1989 Page 3 11 the project development to determine whether existing trees may be preserved. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Should the COmission, upon examination of e Development strict Amendment, decide the changes would promote the land use goals and purposes of the General Plan, that it would not be detrimental to the adjacent properties or cause significant adverse environnw.atai impacts as listed under the Environmental Assess*rt, tho following findings are necessary for approval: 1. The the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of acce, ", size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; Z. That the proposed district change would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and 3. That the proposed district change is in conformance with the General Plan. V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Ua11Y Report newpaper, the property posted, and notices sent to a props y owners within 3O0 feet of the project site.. VI. RECOWENOATION• Staff recommends that the Planning Commission aOoPt the attached Resolution recommending approval of Development District Amendment 87 -12 to the City Council and issue L. Negative Declaration, thereby designating the project sits as Medium Density Residential. Res lly to Bra r City P tiler BB :CN:mig - Attachments: Exhibit "A° - Applicant Letter Exhibit "B1 - Surrounding Zoning Designation N+ip Exhibit "CO - site Utilization Map Exhibit W - Proposed Site Plan (TT 14253) Resolution of Approval 6 crry 3,� .'ON C=0 061988 Cindy Morris Planning Depart=ent City of Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. Re: 12eveopment Districts Amendment 87-12 Reasons for zone change on parcel no. 207-022-64 are am foll"s, - To conform with adjoining Farcel to the north no_ 207-022-54 which wo also own. - To conform with the City/'G �--tvr Plan. - To have bath parcelf5 with OcninSr of Medium Residential R-14 DU/AC for Development Rtvoiw Z-00ject 88-12 Thank You, < Stan Scate5 and Bill Six, Burgundy Creek Bp ELtNE ��f/r'. _,:ut etc �,:ti,o � � . � SI'f��• �+ �'� t'It• °C: � .. "•le3 ?esiner.:cat I !., Vic• :. list. Heed lr 4kTit�u' � v. �f. j.ev.iliatiL t;Jy �� zs � 7Oa F f'o Low "Residcniial t y 2- 4170 /AC �.: SUBJ£C7r Sin is Fzmil. ilwx:d. Q 4 fayysy -- Y.f:c'P a� CAN 0 v , � FC SpQ� ^• � I� FC F�m:ly 3es. , ;c `pow ti'esidefl-aca0 School 2 -4 DU /AC \D-- V. �,st. ; L 1; OR N \ FC PC OF i ITT e ) f s,M y i r- r+ t � I �Z 1 Alln. y� -i 9 �'k v spvpmap 61TY OF ITEU: RANCHO CUCILMONGA TITLE: t-*J;= &n PLANNING DIVISION t� nw. OR .I Original Poor Quality .......... gi % Ju f. 13 11 40�� XORTF Ak CITY OF ITEM nv RANC7"'*" CUCAMONGA PLANNIM DIARON -4 , RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA.. RECOMMENDING 'DENIAL, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, OF DEVELOPKIT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 87- 12, REQUESTING TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP FROM FLOOD COMTROL TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) rOR 1_61 APES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF CARNELIAN AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 1,000 FEET SOUTH OF CALLE DEL PRADD, V=10 CUCAMONGA, . CALIFORNIA, AND MAKIM FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THERET - APN: ? "1- 022 -64. A. Recitals. (i) Stan ScatesrBill Nix have filed an application for Development District A+nendment No. 87 -12 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in V is Resolution, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the pplication ". (ii) On March 8, 1989, the planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted 1 duly noticed public hearing on the application. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. "Ibis Commiss' 6(ew " specifically finds that all of the fact. set forth in Recitals, Part "A ", or this Resolution are trua and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented tc this Corxn'ssion during the above - referenced public hearing on March 8, 1989, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to approximately 1.61 acres of land, in basically a triangular configuration, located west of Carnelian Avenue and approximately 1,000 feet south of Calle eel. Prado and is presently undeveloped. (b) The properrty is land that has beep declared surplus by the Cucamonga County Water District. Tree co~pletion of the Cucamonga Creek Channel which adjoins the site to the west, has removed the potential for flooding. (c) The property to the north of the subject site is designated Medium Density Residential (8 -14 dwelling emits per acre) and is presently developed with three existing older single family hags. Q t PLANNING CObL+iISSION RESDLUTION DDA 37-12 BUP.SUNDY CREEK, LTD. March 22, 1989 Page 2 The property to the west is designated Flood Control and is an improved floed contrail channel. The property to the east is designated Lost Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) and is deveioped with existing single family homes. The property to the south is designated FlQod Control Channel. (d) The requested dirtrict change is not consistent with the General Plan designation for this site, which has been interpreted by the Planning Commission to be Flood Control; and (e) Further study is required to determine whether medium density (8 -14 dwelling; units per acre) is appropriate for the site given possible access constraints on Carnelian Avenue and compatibility with adjacent single family uses. 3. 3ased upon the substantial evidence presented to this Coamission diring the above- referenced public hearing and upon the spmlfic findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1. and 2 above, this Commissica hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the subject property is not suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and AWL (b) That the proposed amendme;•s would have significant impacts an the environment and the surrounding properties; and General Plan. (c) That the proposed amendment is not in conformance with the 4. Based upon the findings and c Wlusions set forth in paragraphs. 1, 2, and 3 ahcve, this Co mission hereby resolves that pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of tho California Government Code, that the Planning Cwmm!saion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends denial on the 22nd dad/ of March, 1989, of Development District Amendment No. 87 -12. S. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AhJ ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF MARCH, 1989. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T.. WNW, ChaIrman ATTEST:__ u a =.r, Secretary PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION DDA 87 -12 - BURGUNDY CREEK, LTD. March 22, 1989 PaSe 3 1, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that-, she foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Cotr.iission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd Jay of March, 1989, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: -11 13 This item has been continued from the �4nuary 25, 1989 Planning Commission meeting in crder to allrAv the app- licant the opportunity to revise his proposed Tentative Tract Map or to prepare a streetscape plan and elevations. The developer has requested a two week continuance to give him additional time to revise the Tract Map. Res wily s ted Br r City P1 nner 88:BN:ml9 Attac'ments, Letter from Applicant i ITEM D I -'— VL4 L VW 46LILYVAV V V VLiL1VlVtstk STAFF REPORT cV �� r ��'� a O Q F Z DATE: March 22, 1989 v r 1977 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Beverly Nissen, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 13898 - NUNEZ residential Subdivision of single am y lots on 2.47 acres of lard in the Low. ;Residential District (2 -4 dwelling unit, per acre), located at the northwest corner of Leman Avenue and London Avenue - APN: 201- 261-57 and 58. Associated with this protect is Tree Removil Permit 88,58, requesting the removal of 10 Eucalyptus 91c4ulus, 3 fruit trees, and 4 pine trees. This item has been continued from the �4nuary 25, 1989 Planning Commission meeting in crder to allrAv the app- licant the opportunity to revise his proposed Tentative Tract Map or to prepare a streetscape plan and elevations. The developer has requested a two week continuance to give him additional time to revise the Tract Map. Res wily s ted Br r City P1 nner 88:BN:ml9 Attac'ments, Letter from Applicant i ITEM D I CENTURY 21 VAL REALTY TEL No Mar 16,89 14:50 P,02 E �-- 1 -1 �3 A A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGp STAFF REPORT DATE: Mooch 22, 1989 TO: Chainian and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Barrye t'. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Joe Stofa, Jr., Assci:iate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL M� acv - +rne riles eve opment ompa'ny - A subdivisio—n—off 38.5 acres of and Into 28 pareelss i the General Industrial District (Subarea 8) of the Industrial Specific Plan and the Light Industrial District (Subarea 4) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan located north of Arrow Route, east of the I -15 Freeway and south of Foothill Boulevard (APN 229- 021 -59) I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Re,uested. Approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Ma Shown on ;:=151i +pB� P as B. Parcel Size: Various sizes ranging from a minimum of Q.6 acres to a maximum of 4.0 acres with the majorlty of the lots bolp'ten 0.7 and 1.0 acres. C. Existing Zoning: General Industrial (Industrial Specific Plan) Light Industrial (Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan) D. Surrounding Land Use: North - I -15 Freeway South - Industrial Buildings (under ca►struction) East - Industrial Buildings adjacent to Parcels 9 -14, Vacant Fdjacent to Parcel 6 West - !acant (Southern Califoria Edisin, Right -of -way) ITEM E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENT Phi 9326 - THE PLIES DEV, CO,, MARCH 22, 1989 PAGE 2 E. Surrounding General Plan and Development Code Designations: North - I -15 Freeway South - Heavy Industrial, Subarea 15 East General Industrial, Subarea 8 West - Utility Corridor, Southern California Edison F. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant with #.'e land sloping approximately fhb to the south. II. ANALYSIS: The purpose of this Parcel Map is to create 28 separate parcels for future development df Industrial b0i?dinge as rncwn on the proposed Master Plan (Exhibit "C "). The project is conditioned to construct the City Master Plan Storm Drain Line within Arrow Routs from the site to Day Creek Channel to the west. However, the portion of Day Creek Channel south of Arrow Route does not have the capacity to accept additional flkw until it is improved (currently scheduled to be completed by March 1991 at the ea- liest). Therefore; if the Parcel Map is recorded prior, to the completion of the channel, an interim retention basin onsite (or perhaps withir, the Edison prc *ierty to the west) :tiill be required. Special Condition 1.e. requires that the basin be screened as approved by the Design Review Committee. The main streets serving the Parcel Map (&, -scow Route, "A ", "B" and "C" Streets) are conditioned to be constructed upon recordation of tite map.. However, the construction of the cul -de -sac street (the easterly extension of "B" Street) has been allowed to be deferred until development of Parcels 8 or 9, because it primarily serves two vacant offsite parcels to the east (refer to Exhibit "C "). In fact, the conditions allow the street to be deleted if those parels ao longer need the access, i.e. they are incorporated into a project Within the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan area and are accessed from Foothill Boulevard. III. ENVIRON14ENTAL REVIEW: The applicant completed Part I of the Initial to dy --Staff conducted a field investigation and completed Part II of the Initial Study. No advevse impacts upon the environment are anticipated as a result of this project. Therefore. issuance of Negative Declaration is appropriate. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Pniting at the site has also been completed. E-::� U PLANNING COMISSION STAFF REPORT TENT PM 9326 - THE PLIES DEV. CO. MARCH 22, L089 PAGE 3 V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input and elements of the Tentative Parcel 104tp 9326. If after such consideration, the Commission can raominend approval, then the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuL a of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Respectfuily submitted, , j"j^ Barrye R. Hanson Senior Civil Engineer BRH:JS:dlw Attachments: Vicinity Map (Exhibit "A") Tentative Map (Exhibit "B ") Matter Plan (Exhibit "C ") Resolution and Recommended Conditions of Approval 'E1S Crry OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WIN r -9 C rin[; PAUML MAP 013 YIUNITY MAP 11 A K] OTHILL BLVD. lzres' I � C am' OF nw' RwrE RANCH-0 CUCAMONGA ZKODMUNG DIMON c- -s` PARCEL. MAP 9316 m rI f� 1 1 I � 1 = f 1 I I z` K a 4 Jy 1 W V „ rXw a + w r z 7I °a! F_ W NTS. d -�- --- a t :y c 4 � f � N f� -- � M � 4 r If a -y .y Q �O A y i d� I 4 � i AESOLUTICN No, A RESULL "ION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CONDITIONALLY TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 932 LOCATED NORTH OF ARROW ROUTE, EAST OF THE I -15 FREEWAY AND SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOI'L2.YARD, AND /TAKING FIMOINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN 229 - 021 -59 WHEREAS. tentative Parcel Map Number 952a, Submitted by The Flies Developm?a Company, applicant, for the Purpose of subdividing into 28 Parcels, the real property situated in the City of Rmicho Cucamonga, Co %.,Ity of San Bernardino, State of California, identified ao APN(s) 229 - 021 -59. 'located north of Arrow Router east of the I -15 Freeway and south of - oothill Boulevard, and WHEREAS, on larch 22, 1:98% the Planning Commisstan hold a duly, advertised public hearing for the above - described r.,-:1p. FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE. 'rHE "CHO CUCAMONGA PLC', XG COMMISSION RESf A0 AS SECTION 1; That the f4;*1awra19 Findings have been made; I. That the map is consistent with the General Plan, 2. That the imPravement of the proposed subdivision is cam* istent With the General Plan, 3. That the site is physically suitable for the Proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improc•_tento will not cruse substantial environmental daug+e, public health prablems or have adverse affects on abuting property. SECTION 2; Thf" Comission finds and certifies that the project has been reviiRT- AMT - Considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Art-*? 177 and, further, this Cuuwission hereby issues at Negative Declaratioer, SECTION 3: That TentAV.Vo. subject S- -if `atta h d Standard Conditions and the follow nq aSpecf4j Conditions: PLANNiNt COMISSION RESOLUTION NO, TEx;T Put 9326 - THE PLIES OEV. CO. MARCH 22, 1989 PAGE 2 Special Conditions 1. If the Parcel Map records prior to the improbement of the portion of Day Creek Channel south of Arrow Route, an interim retention basin shall be designed /constructed as follows: a. The runnoff (Q1OO) fr ;a the site, including any runoff from the area north of the site, shall ba 100% contained within the basin; b. the basin shall have sr�fficient capacity to contain 3 -100 year sequence stormy with a annted gravity or pump system to drain the kasin within 24 -hours diriug the off -peak flog hours; c. k mechanism shall be proW'id for the maintenance /reaovat and the funding thereof of the int :aim drainage facilities b, some entity other than the City with ; provision that the City be allowed access and cast recovery fop maintenance if necessary; d. A plan identifing the interim and permanent drainage facilities shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer; and e. The screening of the Basin shall be subject to the aproval of the Design Re `ew Committee. 2. An in -lieu fee as con »ributiot, to the ftture undergronding of the existirg overhead ut-`lities ielectrical, except for the 66KY electrical) on the opposite side of Arrow aoute shalt be pail to the City prior to the approval of the ,Final --�4. the fee sha11 be one - half the City adopted unit amount timer ,fie length from the center of the Southern California Edison property to the east prr,ject boundary. 3. Parkway imyprovemcnts wAy be Czz�ferred until the development of the adjacent pascals except as otherwise required for the area master plan. 4. Easemnts for joint use driveways sr .ill be provided on the Final Ptkrcel Map or by separate instrwxnt prior to approval of thv. Final Parc *i hap. 5. The cul -de -sac extension of 'B" Street shall be constructed as fq'lows: a. Full. width for the portiod adjacent to Parcel 9 upon development of Parcels 8 or 9. b. A minimum 26' wide pavement within a 40' dedication f4; the portion along the easier -n boundary of Parcel 8 upon the development J Parcei 8. t:—,g 7 L-` PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENT PM 9326 - THE PLIES DEV.. CO. MARCH 22, 1989 PAGE 3 c. The intersections of "B" and "C" Streets shall be constructed as a standard knu;?%le initially and rewmstructed as a standard "Tee" upon construction of the cu--de-sac. d. The cul -de -sac swr a may be dele:.ed if acyess 'rAi the two existing parcels adjacent to the east (APN 229- 013 -15 and 16) is no longer required. 6. The censtructi—r +f the Master Plan Storm Drain within Arrow Rout3 shall be coordimtet; with *,tie Metropolitan hates District, including any offsite eAsements, if required. 7. Provide dedicatior for the I -15 Freeway to Foothill BoulevaFO IF nrchange as regal red by Caltrans and +tae CIV Engineer. 8. The curves within "A" and "C" Streets shall, begin a minimum of 100' north of the bdrb returns with Arrow Route, shall have a minimum radius or 3001, reversing curves shall have the sane radius and be separated by a tangent of IGO'. APPROVED ANG ADOPTEC TW 22ND DAY OF R7RRCH, 1989. PLANNIVS COMMISSION OF THE 317Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1l BY: arry . eirman . �qT!xc,r- ra uyEer, ecreta, -y I` Brad Buller, Secretary of the Plasnirg Comission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the f^regoing Resolution was doy and regularly intro�,ceed, passed, and adopted by the Plannang Comeissior of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Cossmissinn held on the 22nd days of March, 1989, by the following vote -tc -nit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: •a,,-b O ,3 g s i3 p i s$ �� 1T a N � O tl rr M +� b ilS y Y m Nj Zia�y it Y pv, ++ .J41 g y i` o � • wi jig- if � �`� •p � °� �'� �� Q w I; Y Cam �.� ` -x f y ++ 4 V g� 4 Sit g3 �� y8 54-- =i �x • _ S 1413 ' S# i, w 4t s3.ei 4 K N 1 L U• w � Q w I; Cam �.� ` -x f y ++ 4 V Sit g3 �� y8 54-- =i �x • _ y S# i, w 4t s3.ei 4 K N 1 ExS �9 y yk� 1:�� o« u a r W a � w" L 3 vev. sit f it M V+ 3 �W V4 a Y \0 jf. IS �$' N_ ■ y V i 1 w V tl ka Fu Fa- @p. @. .Y�y ^; m .g ®a�. 8 �. �u W . ♦tl V e, Yp i 6 a p Ili ®tlw $ - Vii- ex -e g � a M V cp ^y� ►. O �.N � � V !y u O s d 0 ZAK A v� oil I N 05A"Url CROWS GERALD A. 6ATLIN GEOROI 1K PORTER DOUGLAS C. FROST ROBERT C DOUGHERTY JUDY K. MOORE DONALD G. HASLAM MCLANIE MSCH P9BCRT F. SCHAUER R08CFT N. REEDER COWARD A HOPSON HOWL ID S ?SORCNSYEIN J. ANTHONY yMITH DAVID H. RICKS - STZPHCN 0. WADC R 000OLAS OONCSKY J C.TC R ANEERSDN WAYNE K. SALOWIN AUDREY A PERNI LOUIS J. WHITE RANOAI.L J. PITRIS PATRICIA A. TEUNISSC TRACY L TIOBALS ��Y COVINGTON & CROWE ATTOANCYS AT LAW .1131 WEST SIXTH STRICCT POST OFFICC 3OX 1515 ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA 917a2. TELEPHONE 17141 903.9393 FAX 0141391-676Z March 20, 1989 MAURICE G, COVINGTON OF CDU.S.4 HAROLD A. RAILIN 30.19861 HAND -DE D Chairman, Planning commission City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re., Tentative P -3rcel Man No 1123.2 & 'Variance No as ?3 Wagne>: -InsuS Comn.y Dear Chairman: Wa are aLtorrsys for Wagner -lnsul Company. Our clients request for Tentative Partial idap No. 11212 and Variance No. 88-23 is presently set on your agenda for Wednesday, March 22, 1989. Request is hereby madlt that both 02 the above-mentioned matters be continued to year Planning CommisEiorn meeting on April 26, 1989. f .�^aFeG Y. b f. F. Schauer of COVINGTON $ CROWS RPS:sjo cc: Wagner -Insul Company ATTENTION: Mr. Don 7JaEate - _ �..�.. '� _`.L � ! �...7 / ter..( /�.✓' 1A DATE: Td: . FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA :,gTAFr REPORT March 22, 1989 Chairman and Members of the Plernirg Commission Barrye R. Hanson, Seniow Civil Eno ;,veer Barbara Krall, Assistant Civil Engineer z parcels in the Minimum Impact. Heady Industrial District, Subarea Yo. 9 of the Industrial Specific Plan, located on the south side of 8th Street, west side of Rochester Avenue (APN 229- 251 -10, 11, 12, 27 and 32) I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested:,, Approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map as s ow�no tx "B" B. Parcel Size: Parcel 1 3.96 net acres Parcel 2 - 5.86 net acres C. Existing Zoning: Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial District, Subarea No. 9 of the Industrial Specific Plan D. Surrounding Land Use: North Existing. Industrial Building and A.T. S S.F. Railroad Tracts Sjuth - Vacant East - Existing Industrial Building Nett - Existing Industrial Building E. Suil'Oun ling General Plan and Oevel;Opnlent Code Opsignatloq. - North - Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial, Subarea No. 9 South - General Industrial, Subarea No. 13 East - General Industrial, S,jbarea No. 14 West General Industrial, Subarea No. IC ITEL'l r �s PLANNING COMISSION STAFF REPORT PARCEL MAP NO. 11212 - WAGNER- INSUL, CO. MARCH 22z 1989 PAGE 2 r. Site Characteristics: The site slopes southerly at approximately 21. There are two buildings existing on Parcel 2. The remainder area consists of unattended grapevines and grasses. II. ANALYSIS: The cs*, —se of this parcel map is to create two (?) parcels for 4adusx *sal use. Parcel 1, a 4 acre parcel', is for fvVire development. PaMRI 2, a 6 acre parcel has two Industrial building;. located on the northerly portion of the parcel. The remainder of :,his parzei is vacant and mV b, developed in the future. A variance is required for Parcel 1 because it does not meet the 5 acre minimum required in Subarea 9 o; the industriil Specific Plan. A request for a variance is on tnnight� agenda us VA- 08 -23. The Developer has expressed disagreement with Special Conditions 1(c), 3, 4 and 5 (e). Conditions 5(e) requires that the existing rail spur parallel to 8th Fal Street along Parcel 2 be relocated outside Vm pualic strent right -of -sway to minimize the City's exposure to liability. The Developer feels that this requfivment would be detrfteratal to his current operation by requiring the relocation of his existing loading docks. Staff felt there is some t-izrit to his argument therefore, the condition has been written to allow the spur relocation and street improvements along Parcel 2 to be delayed until :`uturr development on the parcel ar~d be secured by a lieu agraement. Condition 3 requires that the Rochester Avenue. street improvements be extended north of Parcel 2 across the "not a part" parcel to 8th Street. Condition 4 requires that the Developer obtain the necessary off site street right -of -wady to construct the improvements. Rochester Avenue is currently improved full width north of the railroad and on the eastside South of the railroad'. The city has plant. to complefn the railroad crossing within the next couple of years. Staff feels these improvements are necessary to fill in the gap across the "not, a part" parcel to clean Lip the street scape and create a safer roadway. Coadition 16.) requires that the utility undergrounding along Rochester Avenue be ex" },ended across the "not a pert" parcel to clean up the street - scape similarly to Condition 3. 11 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF liEPORi' PARCEL MAP No. 11212 - HAGNER- INSUL, CO. MARCH 22, 1989 PAGE 3 1 The Developer is eligible for reinbursenwnt ,o recover vhe cost of the E street Inrovements and utility undergmunding across the not , part" parcel upon its future developirent. III. ENVIRONMENTAL r'.V:j`!: The applicant completed Part I of the Initial tu`Staf`fcccon�Icucted a. field investigation and completed Part IL of the Initial Study. No adserse impacts upo:i the envi onment are anticipated as a result of this project. Therefore, issuance of Negative Declaration is appropriate. U. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of PuEiit Nearing have been cent to surrounding property owners and ulaced in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been completed. V. RECOMMENDATION It is recorded that the Planninr CoWssion consider ail input an—reiements of th Tentative Parcel Map 11212. If after such consideration, the Cc;n fission: car ;reccmend approval, then the adoption of the attached Ppsolutioa and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Respectfully submittvt, Barrye R. Hanson Senior Civil Engineer BRH:BK :ly Attachments: Vicinity Map (Exhibit "A ") Tentative Map (Exhibit "B ") Rests utioa and Rec4mendeu Conditions of Approval I p .S. __j Original Poor Quality crry OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INGDOEMG TiMMON LWJ f I-m I TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.11212 �i CITY OF RANCHO CUC ONGA RESOLUTIO1 NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNI "5 COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM©NGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIOMLY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 11212, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 8TH STREET, WEST SIDE OF ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKINra FINDINGS 111 SUPPORT THEREOF, APN: 229- 251 -10, 11, 12, 27 AND 32. WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel !sap taimber 11212, submitted by Wagner - Insul, Co., applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 2 parcels, the real property situated in the Cite of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, state of California, identified as APN(s) 229- 251 -10, 11, 12, 27 and 32, located on the south side of 8th Street, west side of Rochester Avenue, and WHEREAS, on March 22, 1989, the Planning Comaissior held a duly advertisyd public hearing for the above - described asap. FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE, .THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANN1%. COMMISSION RESOLVED AS SECTION 1: That the fmllor:rng findings have been made- 1. That the trap is consistent with the General Flan.. 2. That tho improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the „eneral Plan.. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposr;,d development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problem or have adverse affects on abuttinC prope "t'• SECTION 2: This Cottetission finds and certifies that the project has been rev ewe aWconsidered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative De- 1aration. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 11212 is hereby approved subject toie °attached Standard Conditions and the following Special Conditions: 1. Overhead Utilities a. 8th Street v The existing overhead utilities (Co!exunicaiion ling for the 66 K.Y. electrical) on the project side of Nth Stn:et shall be undergrounded as follows: 'p-6 o PLANNING COMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PARCEL MAP NO. 11212 - WAGNER- INSUL, CO. NARCP,, 22, 1999 PAGE 2 (1) Parcel 3 - from the first pole an the west side of Buffalo Avenue to the first pole ea.t of the east parcel propa`tty lint upon develop„xrrt of the parcel. (2) Parser 2 - from the first volt west of the %est parcel property tine to the firs* pope on the east side of Rochester, Avenue. lien agreemnt as described in Condition No. & shall be submitted to guarantee the undergrounding kq)cn further development or redevelor -tat: of Marcel 2. The developer map request a reimbursement agreement to recover one -Yalf the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as Tt occurs on the north side of the A.T. A S.F. Railroad for the pt�-oject frontage and W recover the full cost of the vit} adapted cost for undergrounding from the fj% re development (:*,developsrent) as it occurs on the "net a part" poperty to the east (APR 229- 251 -30 & 31). b. Railroad lines - An in4leu fee as c,)ntribution gs ,suture undergrounding of tie existing overhead WI road Comnication lines locaUd within the A.T. 6 S.F. Railroad right-of -way to the north shall be paid to the City as follows: 1) Parcel 1 - from the centerl na of Buffalo AvE.tue to the east parcel boundary upon development of the parc!;1. 2) Parcel 2 - the length rf the protect frontage on 8th Street from the east parcel bounda , to the "st parcel boundai -j, prior to final approval of the parrcel rAap. The fee shall be the full City adopted unit amour,' times the lengths as described above. 'l►e developer MAY Mquest a rei t.ursement agreement: to rearvyr aneAai'f the City adopted cost or undergrounding fr=om ;ktuxe development (redevelapmcW as it 01curs on the nor•t: side of the A.T. & S.F. Railro4 For the orojert frontage. C. Rochester Avenue The existing overhead utilities (telecommunication. on the project side of Rochester Avenue shall be undergrounded from the pole at the south project boundary to the pole loca,tee at t:re southea,t corner of RoO*ster Avenue and 8th Street prior to approval of the Final Parcel Map. The developer may re4aest a r>imbursenront agreement to recover the ful; cost of the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development" ( r�edeveloproant) as i� occurs an the Not a part" property tAPR 229 - 251 -30) north C. 'Parcel 2. E PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PARCEL MAP NO. 11212 - WAGNER- INSUL, CO.. MARCH 22, 1989 PAGL 3 In addition, an in lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the utilities on the ot• ^osite sid! of Rochester Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to approval of tft� Final Parcel Map. The fee shall be one -half the difference between the undergrounding cost of the utilities (electrical) on the opposite side of the street mirnms those (telecommunication) on the project side times *.,he lsvgti: of the frontage of Parcel 2. 2. Necessary right —f -way shall be dedicated for 8th Street to provide a full width right - oaf -wady of e6 feet. 3. Rochester Avenue shall be improved feam the south project btrmndary to The A.T. 3 S.F. Railroad right -of -wary, including the Std Street curb returns with the exception of Parkway improvements on the "Not a part" parcel. The developer my request a reimbursement agreement to recovor the costs of constructing the Improvements Fronting the "not a part" parcel (APN 229- 251 -30) 4•on its develoiraent (redev�iopment). 4. The developer shall make a good faith effort to require the off -site property interest necessary to construct the required off -site improvements on Rochester Avenue including that portion on 8th Street required for the curb return. If the developer should fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 129 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement with the City to complete the improvements pursuant to r1overnment Cod% Section 66462 at suet: time as the City acquires the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreemant shall provide for payment by developer of all costs Incurred by the Citf to e"cquire the off -site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for these costs shall be in the fore of a cash deposit. That portion of the security reflecting the value of the squired off -:Iite property interest shall be the amount mgiven in an appraisal report obtained by developer, at developers cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. S. The 8th Street improvements shall include the following: a. Full curb to curb width of 44 feet, b. Landscap2ng and irrigation for the north (11 foot wide) parkway (no sidewalk) c. Sidewalk adjacent to the right of way line within the south parkway, d. Cetch basins as necessary connecting to the existing story drain, and; P -g PLARNINO COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PARCEL MAP NO. 11212 - WAGNER -UML, C6. MARCH 22, 1989 `AGE 4 e. The portion of the railroad spur parallel to 8th Street shall be relocated outside of the Street right -of -wait. 6. The 8th Street improvements shalt be completed as follows: a. A lien age -ment shell Le submitted to the City prior to final map tpp „,jval to guarantee future coostructian of the portion forcing Parcel No. 2. The lien agreemnt shall state that the work will be completed arior to issuance of any permit for Parcel 2 including tenant in�rovements of the existing building. b. The improvements of 8t[1 Street along the frontage of Parcel i shall be constructed at the time of the development of Parcel 1. 7. A separate parkway landscape and irrigation plan shall be provided for the north parkway of 8th Street. The pa icway shall be annexed into the City 'landscape maintenance district. 8. A private drainage easem:nt over Pare” ? in favor of Parcel 1 shall be provided and shall be delineated or noticed on the final Parcel Map. 9. A portion of Parcel 2 is located i a Flood Hazard Area. A Flood Report to determire protection require; for the site srnill be submitted prior to any future development within the Flood Aazard Area. APPROVED AND ADOPTED VIS EW OAY OF MARCH 1989. PLANNIWs' CM14ISSMN OF THE CITY OF RPh1CH0 CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNIV, Na rman ATTEST --arm"ul ler, Secmtairy I, 3rad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that Che foregoing Resolution vas July and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning U ,mission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular Meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22 day of Mafth, 1989, by the following t 1te -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ,� NOES; COMMISSIOPERS: AP" "M• COMMISSIONERS: a 4 t 3 6) N N 11, 00ginal Poor Quality E zs U a; egg % �$ 123 a-as , ?$w Y e. N S. lit °,� Ste_ » C ,x p} NA A Ri 1 Y Ow 7 s i K O M ° lip °3 g Y ! J— g a- lit q s -' avert age] c Z _+a .ci0. A .: 4w Q 01 -Q2 .f 3 - -89 PC Agenda 0 2 Of 4 Rip sit hF =�.« E E'u- .2 is— Sol ffir.«C 5-� r 3 1 sd E S g� ��yj pepv� o�ti apq( NI.�1L S�� ►Yi ZGL �01�' ®``GrI� I I S jj !s ^b 2! all pi v� 8 rb mn ffi RR r ug -fin U 3 S a «I u Is at �- • t.1 5 &�' ate bu su OIL L'a I I @A� N E El CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CuCAMo4 > STAFF REPORT c1. cl of o F cat — $ z DATE: March 22, 1989 � tsrr i TO: Chairman and Mem' -ers of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Tom Grahn, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: VARIANCE 88 -23 - WAGNER INSUL CO. - A request for a reduction of e n mum o s ze rom 5 acres to 4 acres within the Minimum Impact 4eavy Industrial District (Subarea 9) of the Industrial Specific Plan, Located on the south side of 8th Street, west side of Rochester Avenue - RAM: 229- 251 -10, 11, 12, 27, & 32. RELATED FILE: Tentative Parcel Map 1x212 I. ABSTRACT: The applicant submitted the Variance request for the ivis on of their property to allow for sale of an unused portion. II. ANALYSIS: The Variancia request, as origninaliy proposed, would avfi a created two parcels, that d;i not meet the minimum parcel size of 5 acres for this portion of Subarea 9. As an adjacent parcel was under the same ownership, staff requested that it be Incorporated into the proposed parcels so that the resulting total acreage could equal approximately lO acres. The current proposal will create .:,o tsrcels out of five existing parcels (See Exhibit "B'). After right -of -way dedications on each of the two new parcels, Parcel 1 is 3.96 acres and Parcel 2 is .5.86 acres for a total of 9.82 acres (.18 acres less than required). Prior to the current proposal (see Exhibit "E "), a 1.5 acre parcel adjacent to 8th Street had not been included. Based upon that proposal, the irregular shaped parcel (see Exhibit "C ") would 5e marketably undesirable. Staff agreed with the applicant. One alternative to tte current proposal is to parcel the land in such a way as to create as near as possible two new parcels approximate in equal size witho�it creating irregular shaped parcels. Parcel I can be expanded in a rectangular shape, thereby, creating a 4.82 Parcel 1 and a 5 acre Parcel 2 (see Exhibit "D "). III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: $% ore granting a Variance, the Planning omm ss on s a make the following findings that the circumstances prescribed below do apply: ITEM G PWINING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT WAGWR INSUL COMPANY March 22, 1989 Page 2 1. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this Code. 2. That there are exceptional or, extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties' in ble same zone. 3. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone. 4. That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone. 5. That the granting of the Variance wi'' not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, ,r materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in a a. y Report newspaper and notices were sent to all proper y owners witnin 300 Feet of the project s'.te. V. RECOi'tMENDATION: If, after considering all input, the Planning o mmi ss on cart make the required findings staff recommends approval of Variance 88 -23 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Parcel Map 11212 Exhibit "8" - Assessors Parcel Map Exhibit "C" Alternative 1 Exhibit "0" Alternative 2 Exhibit "E" - Original parcel Map Prcoosal Resolution of Approval L:J D] <� UiR R e • M �l • ff 1 j r1 I �Q m R ■ ' li Uj Of 9giral Poor Quality C-- -a i ti ILL r re JS ,III l a �4 W I re f43 . ,4 KI t 0 c �I 04 F14 s V z a LU E : r • Ii QI Z y�!a 3 'rA Ly— _ J Thy • :r It �a Y bl All- Y f� � g z <,d • .mss s df uj r r z ^Original Poor Quaflty ;3 — 10 I G�`yt t C� i!a w1 e i] LA 0 T KI ri- Original Poor Quah y i / f 7 1M1 s a \ryy � s � a� Ar t ra 5�A1 3 � �a M 4i G =s J f � a '� I � ' L A s 1 LU i / f 7 1M1 s a \ryy � s � a� Ar t ra 5�A1 3 � �a M 4i G =s J RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNINS COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF R,",.NCH0 CUCAMOPSA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 88- 23, A REQUEST FOR A REDUCTION OF THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE FROM S ACRES TO 4 ACRES, LO'`ATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 8TH STREET, WEST OF ROCHESTER AVENUE, IN MINIMUM IMPACT HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229- 251 -10, 11, 12, 27, AND 32. A. Recitals. (I) Wagner Insul Company has filed an application for the issuance of the Variance No. 88 -23 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On March 22, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing ort the applica and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occf!rred.. 8. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on March 22, 1989, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows. (a) The application applies to ,property located at 11899 8th Street with a street frontage of 1,016,9 feet and lot depth of 373.0 feet; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is railroad right -of -way, the property to the south of that site is vacant, the propovty to the east consists of industrial buildings, and the property to the west consists of industrial buildings. (c) The proposed variance, and related Tentative Parcel Map 11212, comtemplates the creation of two parcols, after dedications, of 3.95 acres and 5.86 acres in size which is .18 acres less than the 5 acre minimum required by Subarea 9. V_ � 9 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. WAGNER INSUL COM°ANY March 22, 1989 Page 2 (d) The property is bounded on the north by a railroad right - of -:gay; therefore, the subject property bore the full burden of dedication for the entire right- of-way width for 8th Street as compared to the more normal half- street iedication. 3. Based upon the cubstantiai evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts snt forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Coeanission ht.:eby finds and concludL., as follows: (a) That st-,ict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unneessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. That there are exceptional or extraordinanry circumstances or conditions applicable to the property 'involved or to the intended use of the property that do not c:pply generally to other properties in the same district. 11 C) That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would RN deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the sams district. d) That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the 1 *.Rations on other properties classified in the same district. e) That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the findivigs and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application. S. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF MARCH 1989. PLANNING COI-MISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: a; - e , a i rman �' 11 ►..;.J 1i PLANNING CQVISSION RESOLUTION NO. WAGNER INSUL COMPANY March 22, 1989 Page 3 ATTEST: Brad "Hu -n er,. tre ary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and M introduced, passed„ and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of March, 1989, by the following vote-t"it: AYES: COMWtSSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT- COM3ISSIONSRS- DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: r, / TA -TTA . --- . v + +T +e F���'j \' Rv�V V VC1y{I�'��SVTST1FCf. �i`iJ. i iVBD� ®J.Vi March 22, 1989 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer Betty Miller, Assiatant Civil Engineer s r� iI ENVIKUNMENIAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL. MAP 11738 - NORDIC - su v s ;.a of 2. 40 acres of land into-- parcels n t e ery Low Residential Development District, located at the southwest corner of �tlrmosa Avenue and Almond Street (APN 1074 - 051-01). Associated with this is Tree Removal P(rmit 89 -13 I. PRWECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of the proposed Tentativtr Parcel Map as shown on Exhibit "B" B. Parcel Size: Parcel 1 - 37,655 SF (0.86 Ac.) Parcel 2 - 33,248 SF (0.76 Ac.) Parcel 3 -- 37,302 SF (0.86 Ac.) Total . . . . . . .. C8 Ac. ) C. Existing Zoning: Very low (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) D. Surrounding Land Use: North Vacant South - Single F ally Residential, under construction East - Single Family Residential, existing West - Single 'amily Residential, approved (currently vacant) E. Surrounding General Plan and Development Code Designations: North- Very Low South -• Very Low East - Very Low West - Very Low F. Site Characteristics: The slope is toward the southwest at approx mate y 11 percent in the easterly half of the site, increasing to 20 percent into the creek Lid which crosses the westerly half from north to south. A tributary gully runs from the Almond /Hermosa intersection to the midr-4rre of the south property tine. The site is heavily welded. ITEM H PLANNIH-2 COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 11738 - NORDIC MARSH 22, 1984 PAGE 2 II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The tentative parcel map further subdivides a remainder parcel treated by Tract 12902 which is Currently under construction (ei)ibit C). This portion was separated from the original tract because it was necessary to obtain City approval of a geologic report For the site.. This has now been done. Hermosa Avenue is improved adjacent to this site, with the exception of parkway improvements. Therz are approved strpat aitd storm drainage facility plans for Almond Avenue. Completion of both are conditions of approval for both this Parcel Map and Tract 12902. The relocation of the internal Community Trail, which connects with the Community Trail on Almond Streets has been approved by the Trails Committee. B. Tree Removar The applicant has also submitted a tree removal permit to remove solneted trees within the realigned community trail. The removal of ffies—e-rrees is necessary to allow safe passage through the trail. The trail will still remain in its natural state as much as pissible - wholesale tree removal and grading is not permitted.. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Study. Staff con ucted a field investigation and completed Part II of the Initial Study, Staff identified that the site is located within the Alquist- Prioto Special Studies 'Zone, meaning the site may be subject to has potentially significant adverse impacts from earthquakes. The applicant provided a geologic report, which was reviewed by the City's consultant, indicating that ro earthquake faults exist within the area. As a result, no adverse environmental impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Therefore, issuance of Negative Declaration is appropriate. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding proper 5RHers and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been completed. 11 E. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 11738 - NORDIC MARCH 22, 1989 PAGE 3 V. RECOM14ENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all nut and elements of the Tentative Parcel Map. If after such consideration, the Commission can recommend approval, then the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, &&WWt A4440V Barrye R. Hanson Senior Civil Engineer BRH:BM:ly Attachments: Vicinity Map (Enhibit "A") Tentative Map "(Exhibit, "B") Local Area Map (Exhibit "C") Resolution and Pecoamended Conditions of Approval Orighal Poor Qucgty TENTATIVE I PARCEL NO. 1 r 738 IN THE CITY OF AANCKO CUCAMONGA OCtWO A S=tvt Si*M OP VMS RfMkIUM PARCEL. a +RACT FMZ AS PER PLAT RfCORDEO iN SM Z07. PAfdES 1? TMOWN .16 OR M6P RECORDS W SAN �'RTURO'No COUNTY, STATE OF CAWFW01A.., cm OF RANCHO CUCAMONG4, I,,:, {U®I s— V. PA .L MAP t ! "ll Ej • OrEgi�f'VGi C.U1.3r 5ytr.oCdii�/ r� - %_CRCEL 4 J I 1 1111I IL T ai awe co t • ► . 1-•_ 1 i �N w r � 22 23 24 F ;� ke � _ i w KeTlsae cr 'e 21 20 19 = �i 16 17 is cq 'r' IS I2 1 .'•S Lla 539.F4.�. m� �SJSA136 Y. 3i�eET f Via. 3�i C0 Yff OF PARt-EL MAP 41' 3 a RANCHO CUCAMONGA nna. LOCAL AREA MAP E87Gi1MMMVt' YNMON mmmrp.-.. Jahk RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO C.UCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVIr1G TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 11738, LOCATED AT ln� SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HERMOSA AVENUE AND ALMOND STREET, AND MAKING FIKOING$ IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APH 1074 - 051 -01 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 11738, submitted by Nordic Hoods II, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 3 parcels the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, identified as APN 1074- 051-01, located at the southwest corner of Hermosa Avenue and Almond Street and WHEREAS, on March i, 1989, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised publip hearing far the above - described map. 0W, THEREFPiE . TtiE RANCHO CUCAMO.%A PLANNING C"ISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SFr 1ON 1- That the following findings have been madwa 1. That the :asp is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3.. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development, subject to the mitigation mea -ir+es outlined in `,he conditions of approval. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: This Consission finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and censidered in copliance with the California Environmental Quality ftt of 1970 ardo further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. SECTION a: That Tentative Parcel {Map No. 11738 is hereby approved subject S° ge attached Standard Conditions and the following Special Conditions: 1. An in -lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (teleeomni (,ations and electrical) on the opposite side of Almond Street sh411 be paid to the City prior to approval of the Final Parcel Map, The fee shall be one -half the City adopted unit amount timed the length from he center of Hermosa Avenue to the west prciect i oundary (353+). ti S —7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 11738 NORDIC MARCH 22, 1989 PAGE 2 2. Provide an easem'#nt for Community Trail purposes east of the drainage course. Proposed improvements shall be consistent with those for Tentative Tract 12902 to the south, as approved by the Trails Committee and the City Engineer. Provide a reasonable connection, with less than 20 percent grade, to the Cwvinity Trail along Almond Street. 3. Main north /south natural drainage channel: a) Minimal grading Is allowed within the channel as necessary for flood protection for future residerces as approved by the City Engineer. b) AlI - buildings shall be set back a minimum of 50'' from the edge of the Q100 water surface level, unless erosion preventing measures such as rip rap are provided in selected locations. A defined building set back line to this effect shall be placed on the Final Parcel Map. C) An offer of dedication to the City for drainage purposes for the total area leithin the building set back lines shall be made an the Final Parcel Map. 4. The Almond Street crossing of the natural channel and the storm drain system within Almond Street shall be constructd per the approved plans. 5. C.C.&R.S shall be prepared for the project to preserve existing trees, maintenancc of trails, and minimize grading. fu „ther, C.C.6R.S shall prohibit solid (view obstructing) walls or fences. The C.C.bR.s shall be pr/pared by the applicant and submitted to the City for review rind approval prior to approval of 'the Final Parcel Rap. 6. All trails, fences, drainage provisions and site clean -up shalt be accomplished in conjunction with street improvement installations. 7. All reimbursement agreements in favor of adjacent developers shall be honored. E IL PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 11738 -- NORDIC MdIRCH 22, 1989 P!,GE 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTE6 rilS 22ND DAY OF MARCH 1989 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY C.:' RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry WNW, a &A- ATTEST• �BraU BulTer.,"S —ecr iwry I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Coomission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do here °y certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the Cit- of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22m day of March 1989, by the following vote - twit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COWISSIONERSt 3 a s �tl Eli 3' Y N Original Poor Quality 1 M i `.p 0•� qb ` Oa �x °a S d- Iry lisp. afV� Hs 1_1 �. � ��� �b 24 ail kill at= Uc Aq 1 76 _ s . a �II �� � • j� a� V • 3 r1�y �$j, � r` V� :shy. YN iM`O 4+®W WY t1le�T Oj Yr0 �J. V N r II II�i� El El t a3 s. Boa L V r N Y e k0 y4 V V V 7Eli V A` w 2 b q�,tl ��_ 1ti i bYY.W g� �• is 13% s+$i yM Eli F8 b x � sY v yj ei six S2 IL M y a -z w lit te a , '.: N sss ,a� a •1 L� 4� a3 s. e k0 y4 L nsM f ^" T A A71" TT. ^T— w wcnwrn A vaai vq anc- a.wc...raav v�vcuuvaivca STAFF REPORT ��� °G tt � o Q F_ Z DATE: March 22, 1989 � 1977 > TO: Chairman and Vembers of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Brett Horner, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ''RNOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 89 -07 - A.W. DAVIES - A request for expansion of a non -can orm ng use y ad, ng 710 square feet of office space to an existir 9u7iaing and warehouse totaling 4,560 square feet on 3.82 aces of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 3`' of the Industrial Specific Plan,. located on the southeast Corner of 9th Street and Helms Avenue - APN: 209 - 031 -53 and 54. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a site plan and elevations for N-710 square fooi office addition to an existing building. B. Surrounding land Use and Zoning: North - Industrial buildings; General Industrial (Subarea 3) South - Industrial buildings; General Industrial (Subarea 3) East - Single family residence and orange grove; General. Industrial (Subarea 3) West - Industrial buildings; General industrial (Subarea 3) C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - General Industrial Norm - General Industrial South - General Industrial East - General Industrial West - General Industrial ITEM I PLANNING C"ISSION STAFF REPORT NOR 39 -07 - A.W. DAVIES March 22, 1989 Page 2 go D. Site Characteristics: The site has been developed as a ui ng con ram cctor s office and storage yard, including a 4,580 square foot building, a large storage area which contains building equipment, supplies, and construction materials. The site does not currently meet various Development Code and Industrial Area Specific Plan standards with respect to street landscape setbacks, parking Tot design, screening of stora_* areas, and certain public street improvements. The property was improved prior to the City's incorporation and adoption of development standards. E. Parking Calculations: Humber of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Foota ! Ratio Required Provided Office (with . 2,87,E 1/250 11 addition) Warehouse 2,400 1/1000 2 1133 Tatar 13 23 II. RNALYSiS: 41 A. General, Development Review 89 -07 was heard by the aisinning Commission cn February 8, 1959, At that time, the City Planner recorremended approval of the project subject to certain conditions for on -site and 00 -siiA improvements in order to bring the non conforming site up to current development standards. The Commission, however, felt that these conditions combined represented too great a burden for the applicant, given the limited scope of the project. Thus, the Commission directed the City Planner and City Attorney to meet with the applicant to establish which conditions and improvements could :,e revised. Based on the Cowlssirn's direction at the February 8, 1989 meeting and in accordance with Scction 17.02.130 of the Development Cade, pertaining to expansion of non - conforming uses and structures, the original conditions were revised as follows: j Original Condition Revised Condition Planning Division„ 1. Provide 13 parking spaces Unchanged to City standards ;1: � ---;- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MR $9 -07 A.Wt DAVIES March 22, 1989 Page 3 Original Condition Revised Condition 2. Provide screening and landscaping Relocate existing along Nelms Ave., Feron Blvd. and chain link fence to cmpleti+on of public improvements 9th Street the required setback Delented i-P evidence is submitted shoring along 9th St, and t,tat a 2 -}tour fire wall exists landscape and irrigate the entire 9th St. frontage, Relocate existing chain link fence along Helms Ave. outside the public right -of -way and plant and Irrigate vines along the fence at a minimum of 10 feet on center. Engineering Division 1. Submit a lot line adJustment Unchanged 2. Provide an additional 3 feet unchanged of dedication 3. Install "No Parking" signs Unchanged along all street frontages 4. Provide sidewalk, street trees, See Part 8, street lights and standard drive "Issues ", below, approaches ilong all street frontage" ". A RegistQrad Civil Engineer unchanged shall prepare all street improvement glans 6. Past surety guaranteeing Added to revised cmpleti+on of public improvements Condition 4 7. naive Engineering Condition I Delented i-P evidence is submitted shoring t,tat a 2 -}tour fire wall exists B. issues; The wording of Conditions 4 and 6 will remain esscntially unchanged. However, the improvements required by Condition 4 could be phased and installed subsequent to Occupancy of the Office addition. If the Commission is PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPOU MDR 89 -07 - A.W. DAVIES March 22, 1989 Page 4 is comfortable with the phasing and feels that it is appropriate, the City Engineer will need to establish a time schedule for the phasing. The applicant will have to post surety and execute an agreement guaranteeing cc:apietion of the public street improvements. This 'phasing" of the public improvements would be consistent with C5apter 12 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal CoC3, which requires Improvements but allows the City Engineer flexibi My 'in determining exactly when they must be completed. The attached Resolution of Approval has been drafted to allow the phasing subject to approval of the City Engineer (see Engineering Division Condition 4). If the Commission does not feel that phasing is acceptable, this condition must be revised. Finally, the Commission may also want to give direction to the City Engineer as to what it considers appropriate time limits. III.. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The request will not be detrimental to the goals an o ec ves of the General Plan. The request will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. TV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recomwrnds that the Planning Commission approve nor Development Review 89 -07 subject to the conditjrns in the attached Resolution of Approval. /OBB 11y bmitt//e''d, e ner B B:BN:ko Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Building Elevations Exhibit "B" - Staff Report of February 8" 1939 Resolution of Approval with Conditions 11 Z"7 L r-- R4L G&zA&L g �r CW774 5i: OWMAL I _ nt x W 1 %11� `�^ Vn it rlrrtrd%%,r ITEM 89-07 TITLE: L9WATION MAP Noirin SOTS >rr�sr. W ��`4- PRl CW774 5i: OWMAL I _ nt x W 1 %11� `�^ Vn it rlrrtrd%%,r ITEM 89-07 TITLE: L9WATION MAP Noirin Ll CITY O .— ITa17 RANCHO CUCAMONGA Original Poor Quality sras am EA5i aLEYAl . —I RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: BMIDMIGELEVASIMS CITY OF RANCHO CUC.4k- VIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE February 8, 1919 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planrer BY: Brett Horner, Assistant Planner f SUBJECT: MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 89 -07 - A.W. DAVIES - A request to add square ee o o ice space zn existing building and warehouse totaling 4,560 square feet on 3.82 acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 3) of the Industrial Specific Plan, located ors she southeast corner of 9th Street and Helms Avenue - APN_ 2094 031. -53 and 54. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of site plan and elevations for a 600 square foot a lice addition to an existing building. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North Industrial buildings; General Industrial (Subarea 3) South - Industrial buildings; Gineral' Industrial (Subarea 3) cast - Single fancily residence and orange grove; General Industrial (Subarea 3) West - I64iustrial buildings; General Industrial (Subarea 3) C. General Plan ,Designations PMiact Site General Industrial North - General Industrial South - GenEwol Industrial. East - General Industrial West - General Industrial 4--g v PLANNING COMMISSION _tAFF REPORT MDR 89 -07 A.W. DAVIES February 8, 1989 Page 2 .. v. Site Characteristics: The site is occupied by an office/ warehouse building acid storage yard. A 4,560 square foc?t building exists on -site as does a large storage area iich rontains building equipment, supplies, and construction rrater;ais. The site does not currently meet various Development Code and Industrial Area Specific Plan standards with respect to street landscape setbacks, parking lot design; screening of storage areas, and certain public street improvements. The property was improved prior to the City's incorporation and i4option of development standards. E. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parkin�l Spans Spaces of Use Footage Raiio Required Provided Office 2,16" 1/250 9 Warehouse 2,400 111000 2 Proposed Addition 600 1/250 2 11 Total 13 11 II. ANALYSIS: A. General: Minor Onvelopment Review 89 -07 has beer. referred to tie -F a ning Com fission for review and action. The pro ect involves issues of Coxmission policy with regard to upgrading of non- conforming sites (to current development standards) at the time of ary proposed expansion. B. Project Chronology: Listed in able format be!,-"4 is a bvief -description a e projer.V s history. Date Action June 6, 1988 The applicant applied for a building permit for the office addition and was informed of the requirement for a Minor Development Review (MDR). June 13, 1988 The applicant submitted the MDR application (NOR 88 -25). June 23, 1968 City staff respondc3 with an incompleteness letter (ErhAhit "G "). Sept. 19, 1968 The 'applicant met with City staff concerning screening /landscaping and ofs r tdquirement5. i _mod 9 PLANNING COMMISSION AFF REPORT MnR 89 -07 - A.W. DAVIES February 8, 1989 Page 3 Date Action Nov. 16, 1988 The applicant submitted a letter requesting phasing of the requirements for site improvements (Exhibit "F "). Dec. 6, 1988 The applicant mid with City staff to discuss the phasing proposal. Staff explained p;:asing of improvements is a policy issue and would remain as a condition of approv;0 . The applicant indicated his desire to appeal the conditions to the Pianning Commission. Dec. 13, 1988 The City Planner approved MDR 88-25 subject to 8 conditions for site improvements (Exhibit "D "). Dec. 13, 1988 The appeal period ended and no appeal was filed. Jan. 16, 1989 The applicant met with City staff" to request reconsideration of the original application submitted June 13, 1988 and if necessary that this matter be taken to the Planning Commission. Jan. 25, 1989 The applicant re- applied for an MDR which does not address the conditions placed on the previous approval. Feb. 1, 1989 At the request of staff, the applicant submitted a letter presenting the reasons they have submitted the modification (Exhibit "E "). C. Issues: Ira accordance with previous policy direction and eve'" &Topant review actions, the City Planner approved NOR 88- 25 subject to conditions which would have brought the subject site into substantial conformance with current development standards. These conditions included requirements fee public improvemme:rts, such as the installation of public side, street trees, street lights, driveway approaches, and "no parking" signs, and on -site improvements, such as atreetscape landscaping (25 Feet off' a dsc:eped area as measured from curb face), screening of storage areas, and additional parking lot construction to satisfy parking demand generated by the proposed office expansion. Additional street right -of -way dedication (3 feet) and a lot line adjustment were also made conditions of approval. It should be noted that these /0 PLANNING COMMISSION AFF REPORT MDR 89 -07 - A.W. DAVIES February 8, 1989 Page 4 conditions are standard conditions placed on all proposed expansion projects on non- conforming sites. In no way do they represent "special" or "new" cc; litions which have not been r--quired Of simi . ^­ property ownors in the past. During the previous Minor Deve%pment Review process the alicant substantiallygcomplied with the conditions of approvallfar MDR 88 -25. The matter of phasing the improvements was the only remaining issue where agreement was not reached, the Planning and Engineering Divisions could not support t"* applicant's proposed phasing plan. The City's Municipal Code re Mires that all public improvements (those within or ad acen the public right -of- way, such as s4dewalks, street lights, street trees, etc.) be constructed with the issuance of a building permit (and not phased). Phasing of on- si�';e improvements is not restricted by ordinance but was deemed vri=eptable due to currents policy and the legal details and potential enforcement problems associated with this action. Before City Piann.r gook action on the initial Minor Development Review he invi4ed the applicant in to discuss staff's position on the phasing. The applicant indicated that he intended to appeal tae City Planner's decision on the phasing to the Planning Commission. However, an appeal was not filed within the 10-Jay period established by the Development Code. Instead, the applicant has resubmitted a revised Elinor Development P.eview application. With this application (MDR 89 -07), the applicant does not propose to comply with the 8 conditions placed on the original (MDR 88- 25) approval. Given this situation, the CIV Planner detemined that the project should be referred to 'he Planning Commission and either be approved subject to the original 8 conditions or be denied as proposed. Conditions may also be deleted or modified at the direction of the Commission except those required by Ordinance. Those would include the off -site improvements. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The facts for findings will depend or, which sou on is adopted. See each attached Resolution (paragraph 3) for specific findings. IV, RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve nor —Development Review 89 -07 subject to conditions or deny the application (as proposed by the applicant) by adopting the appropriate Resolution. PLANNING C"ISSIOK, A4FF REPORT MDR 89 -07 - A.W. DAVIES February 8, 1989 Page 5 4Reslly s d, r BB:BH:ko Attachments: Exhibit '%0 - Location Map Exhibit "I" - Site plan Exhibit "G" - Building Elevations Exhibit "B" - MDR 88 -25 Approval Letter Exhibit T' - Letters Uplaining Re-application Exhibit "F" - Letter Requesting Phasing of Improvements Exhibit "8" - Incompletenes.,5 Letter Reso',ution 0f Approval wi +h Conditions Resolution of Denial i J J 47E) V4 - �jT'iI' a�ER1.►L. 49 f JIC a. Y—y / /7 V :iIIVMA4.. 11 PROPOSED 600 SO. FT. ADDITION STING BULLING NOyf RANCHO CUCAMONGA nTLE: P:.AN Original Poor Quality N/N MHiIpV Ti'YY I 4 �wrs�rs a rr na�wreahrrr+wrtirr -- — - ,..aaer..r�n►v:,.�. 16.vsa{�a...w. tiasesH''� INC!aTaT:� ✓.�Tki'y' Ed5T E-'.=YAM,q CITY OF 15' ITEM-. MM 6"7 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: .®. 'n711TC:Tt171� Original Poor Quality CITY OF RANCHO C4CA3tONCA , •»..i a.:� L0.-. r...a,.n4 :a •.i.:•1 ., s.w .i tkeamber, 17, 19" *1 Jorge Gareta Garcia and Associates 10722 krow, Redte, sotto 504 Rarnhu C41tUmat4.. CA 91730 SUBJECT: li1NOR DEVELOF"Ehr WIEit 88.23 near W. Garotat Ye &rot in receipt of your tatter ra ;estins py4sint of the on.site improvements required as part o! tttno.QOevelbpsent RlYfaw 88 -2S, The ttrnitipal Cade retaifret- t�At 411 public teproveatnts be constructed with Me isuarco of a building parw.t. lhoreFara. public improvewta Can not be ph4sad. Further, staff Cinnat support the propas" ph4stnt of rtia"� to COnstrugtl4a yard. This position 13 13 cpne3fshnt With pact actions of tho D4partmOnt. The Industrial SO4CifiC plan raquirts the screening and sines not include iProvision p y deefi om de is not otOr4fnainsfi irettff' .1% is with the public Improvements, I thank you for taffnt tRe tint last rays to not with the and staff discuss your proJect. As ws 4tseussa4 at thet meeting You der in 49r""ranttrrt an the screening rev?neat and only Wtstfoh the is c policy dKISIai. Therefore if shad � ctioi(205. ct was to Only NInor 0avoloonent Renew 88.2s oa the basis that Sc rceniny is kequire4 and that you did Rot with to totpty with the raepggren4ed ew'O �dn. The secono rag to approve your pmjtct Kith the aOpropr conjitfors as noted oalow, 16 CNIC4 wes to approve your pro3ttt with condivions. this natistsn shall be affective foil orfuy a 10-day appaeI period beginning with the date Of this latter. please also note that fallowing our fast "ttgnngg and the diteussitn,on the txisttng property lines and 0xfstt buiidfnty, if evidence is presented which cakfusively shows that not tine 40 2 solio. 2 hour fire walls Kith no egentnts esists bats" tiM tmt Parctis anal butldints. the foorcresaits will only be regeloA as time northerly parcel. FtnCgnas A. That the trap41a4 project with conditions is ce>ststast wttr tit GOW*l plan. S. Nt the propeud Project with eanditiOns ft In accrrdanee With the o0octivos Of ►'•:- lndustrl47 Area Specific +fan and the Purow of the dist< in which tht sitra is taate9, C, Tb4t the pr"Oo A prolaet, together with t•e conditions applftsbif therlto, will not be dttrfm"Ul to the publie . heu /the safety. Cr wslfart or mate- §ally injurious to properties qr isprovewts in the Viet• 0. that the PPCKI44 pro3tte will v,.e11y with Ault of the ri applicable prosiont of the Development Code. Inv Original Plor Quality Conittaas This project is approved subject to the following conditions, Planntrte 01111 n 1. 'At Applicant shall provide 3 additional parking stalls to be sav(ad. striped, and locatad within a parking lot which Wits all applicable City Standards. 2. +lke construction yards shat) be scraunod from public vier along Holes Avenue, Fa Nn kulevard. and 9th Street thrugh the g shallalbe.revimcd and Ripproved by the citypPllaanner and shall meet all City Standards with regard to design, location, and construction materials. Screening shall be installed prior to occupancy raises* of the addition. Ertgineerng Otw)ston 1. The applicant shall su0mit a IV line adjustment to eliminate the lot line that crosses the b4ilding prior to issuance of building permits, 2. The applicant shall provide an additional 3 flat of dedication for street right-of -ray along Home Avenue. 3. The apnitcant shell install `us Parkin, "in, sirs on all street frontages to the satisfaction of/ the City Engineer. a• the a ? ?lIcant shall construct the following street lmpro vaments on Feron Boulevard, Helms Armes, an 9th Street. a) Sidewalks adjacent to ultimate right- of•way. b) Street trees. c) Reconstruct drive approaches to City StOO-4 Ho. 306. d) Street lights. 5. Street fmprovem"t plans, includi" parkway treats, street lights, and drive a??roathea prepared 4y a Aa9istered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer shalt be required for all public streets prior to issuance of an encroachment pewit.. 6. S('r*ty Shall be Posted and p agreement exatuted to the satisfaction of the C1ty Engineer and City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of th* ?optic street improvements prior to issuance of building Part ts. Pi Hill not* that conditions sky specify completion of certain plans -Ir work Prior to fs,tuanceaf building pnmtte. If evidence is presant*d whicb conclusively shCn that a lc4 likes and a solid, 2-haur fin wall with ne opnaings exists betiow the tw parcels an buildings. the improvements milt only be regrind or, the northerly s91HM1Gd. 209•W1.33) and EugiBOering Qivt *tan's Cr .u4itim 1 tan be if yax Sbwid haw a w questions eoncemZtg Specific conditions, please felt fn* t* COW; Brett H;Mer at 1714) M.)Kt. 3lhcen)y, CQllMF, Qk7AR1NENf Ci plesNer M:mig ATY OF 7 PLANN12fGD1VJS 01i ITEM: 89-07 TI ALE: 88-25 AMR---. L LETTER rV ul "Irk 1. Original poor Quality aanuary 30, b,.s Ci;c:;os a. G:sa��• brad L"ullec, City.Diannac city of Rancho Cucamonga 9720 Dasaline Aced ,,cot ottits Dom 007 R3neho Cucamonga CA $1 -30 Res Minor Development review ad�as (Re -tiled January 14. 1A64Y Dear Hr. sullars our client, the Albort i. Davis Company, has re #ubttttad . Its application in tars substantially identical, to that originally zubmitted. You are avags that 4 prior subsission was the subject of discussion between umt that our alie:;t did not tool that it could secspt the eonditiono 1ai4 down by skater and that the appeal peric4 was permitted to run to permit addittonat disoussione which did not produce agr%000nt. as therefore r,queet that the issue Of the exactions p, roWire4 by the city be submitted dlrectly to the planniev 0Lasian. YOU are Ware that it is our all :ust's position t.at an tyienminor4additinntltoQ=e office capacity of the grartsi4r.a Rol^ is will Appreciate onythinq you can do to expedite prs,anta_ tion to tho planning eo�iasion. 80 that both our client and city ,tatf will have the cpg&-"unity to present their restpacttve posi- tions on this issue. Thank yoz tot your attention to this better. Very truly yours, csa /aa Cha� , ra Cal client Jorge Carols ' :Faa 14 . -.4 e is u yu - • 1.. n r�t i I GA prisinal Poor Quality January 7, 1989 2ECEfr70- G. .R Ru:CMO CUG�olga City of Rancho Cucamonga. P"t Office Jox 807 i {a,9dt',ll,T2i1w2�3µ b Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attanticnt Brad Buller, City planner Z Ras Minor Development Review 88 -25 Albert . W. Davies, Inc.. Gentleman: Albert B. Davies, Inc, the applicant for the above - rafereneed Minor Development neview and his representative Mr.. Jorga Garcia have c.naulted to this office becaule of their ongo- ing reluctance to Concur With the conditions sought to be imposed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga for approval of that application. They have asked me to address soma Coements to the City wi :th . respect to the application. We have reviewed the application, and the conditions requested by the city. It is apparent to us that the city is at- tempting to exact conditions and force expenditures which bear no ralationship to the very small need created by this application. The request truing made by the applicant is to add $00 square fast to 4,560 Aquare feet of office specs in an existing struc- turv_ 600 square feet represents office accommodations for three additional amployose. The building% approximate value in $140,000.00: only $20,000.00 Will bs expanded upon this improve- ment. The City has imposed as conditions the provision of 11 addi- tional parking spaces, scramming on 4 sides of the prrpertyt a lot line adjustment to remove an existing lot line: sidewalkst grading of drivewayst lights: the dedication of additional right of ways and pork.ng signs. The estimated cost of the improvement is $204,000.00. The Supr:_e C .1urt of the United Stabs. in Nallan v— California Cj � ss ion, 107 3.Ct. 9W41 (1937) hold . that a property dedication rsquirsm,:at -must possess kn essential nexus to the impact 01 the proposed developmtnt.N _7�eaitioM must he is imposed for the purpose of mitigating any advers.1 affect which a proposed project will have. It is evident that the conditioM sought to be imroned by the _city bear no relationship whatsoever (much less even a ra- tional relationship) to the need created by this development. The City is atbsoting to exact, as a condition of a routine buildinq permit for a minor addition to a substantial etructurs, conditions of siglUficant expenditure. It in exactly that conduct which the He" case held to be a taking. It should not be necessary for citizens of the community or applicants for building permits to have to tight their way through bureaucratic attempts to obtain tar more than a proper exaction. our client has hesn obligated, daspitr his protesta- tion, to continually state and rntats this position. He has in- dicated a willingness to coaprcalds, and a willingness to etempt to work out a long term nlan for Sams of tha isprovaments the City wants. But he is unwilling, In exchange tar this minor permit, to bs subjected to demands having no relationship to the need which it cremres or to unrsaaonabA* requirements of the City. The K21: "A cams impossS upon the courts t-he obligation to make an avaluatiOA of the relation"Ip botuton the need created by an sp- climation and the Conditions sought by the a_ .Mnity. It should not be necessary to invoke a court's scrutiny. But my client will do so before he agrees to seat outrageous and unjustifiable requirements. V& Would appreciate hearing from you in a spirit of Coopera- tion, which could result in Z— :Olving this utter without the necessity of furthar confrontation, Your attention to the considerations sot forth in this let- / tar is invited. l vary truly yours, CITY OF Charles s. Daek7 , THE 8"7 RANCHO CU17AMONGA nTLBs 111 L..ATI .�... ___ 49'3". a . , se++�.ea w si►_. -.0 VV - - __ Ort`gknal Poor Garcia & Associates 10:2'4now Rwe S""VA RN:noc.mL .er CA91!Ip ,li•A &7.767! voy9meber 7n. 1989 CITY OF IIANCNO (uCt =x-4 PLA•MNIYO DEPA27MENT 9)40 -8 Bas *line Rpad Rancho CMcanonga, CA 9ty3n Attention; Mr, Brett Horner Assistant Planner Subject: 40. Owtes Ensinetring OFiice Addition ml%M MEtOPMENT REVIEW 96 -25 Dear Rrett: This if a supplement to our telephone conversation regarding the lmolemen tat ion of the MOR 88 -25 dequirtnwnts. Our tlltnt Is proposing the col lowing progtam to implement the subject matter. SCOPE OF hORKSt It Is proposed to add approelmaltly 600 sq.ft. of area to. " building building withln At' ►trendy develapad Project. The proposed "Pen slon Is within the ailowabl• uses set forth *f the industrial $pacific plan. MDR. REQUIREMENTSt Planning btvlsion: 1. Parting Raoui rement$: Eleven (11) parking. vpac*t will be provided as required by city ordinance. 2. Service Yard. SCraan.ngt Tee city ordinance require, that we sc *an ,+alms Avenue, Feran alvd. and algng the northern and tastetn. property line$ with the teaeirtd fandtcapinS. In grdar to *%acute this ptogrlrn, the v.;ntt raqu *tt *d that this spacffic condition be implanaattd within a throe (3) year time tune. to order to insure that the wotk It. Accanallth#d within Phu time Irmo, the owner *111 provide a S1;ttty a=nd tar estimation of the cost of consttuttlan, Purthtrnnro. tho c=ter wilt provide access tights to the city to aeetsnplish such : work. The requested time Fts,.. It needed due to the tact that a major tenet is pt*tenelr occupying the southern p'attten of the pteporev oltit the ufldetatandtng that thttt fo&sm agromwit wilt be due w)tken three (3) Years, presently, the wRef can not petfarm any Wyrk withln. the 6oundries al tae otilact. Speeilieey it ttv fereanrng would t#quiro A prnpertY tee oark of 25 feet as vote at retocation of the driveways. The oweet has •apressad his desire to c000tute, and in to order [o. show ?ts good fAith, he has suagestsN that a portion of the ZMrft could. be Implanvnted &tong 9th Street which is nne of the ee vitl6ty sections of the prgl*tt. A4 you are aware, this reRefrwnaet if eatremely cost!;: vrith tasreCt to the minor Willies that Is proposed, 11 11 eeewe ran *ranee.,.* e o nTLE: UAL U91=1 LETTM Phase IIz wale Scroeni.Ii /Streetsaaping: "Ines iaplam atatiou of this program. will require engineerIml drawings to be reviewed by muny c n v agencies and Surety send approvals will take quite a bit of time. as saw :,to aware, we are anxious to cawnence this .program and we toques, our ass). tonce rasardlag these matters. S"uld YOU have my questions., Duane feet free to contact us at your varltest convenience. R�t}\pect(gily, CAIK IA i AS S dg ITFCTS ����YI 5 EHGIh7'E ERI 1a' R. C AIA , Alba t `►r)nclost President cc: File )RC /crI 1 OF -4 N .ss CUC Original iOoor Quality Engineering Division. Fxisting Overhead UU II tV Requi rementst Thar. is. no existing overhead utttlittes within the ProPefty boundries,. Issues 1. Lot Line lustmentt The owner is willing to adjust the two existing. lott Into one parcel„ 2. Street improvmentst A) Sidewalks: The UCR requires sidewalk imptuvements. we would Iike to bring to Your attention t At there is no existing. sidewalks on either tide of Nelms Avenue. or Foron Blvd. The only existing sidewalk within the p:oximity of the or. -t is along the north s, of 9th Street. we would- t' to raquest that sidewalks �a required alone the south ifae o' 4th Strgec only (north. Property line of sdbfect project). b) Street Troes: Landscaring will be provided accgrdina to city standards. e) Eatsting DrivewaYs: The drivea-i in Foron Blvd. Is new. All d rlv•rays in Nelms Avenue -ill be npgtided to Titi • sx andar•ts. d) Stt -- Lights- Street 11-1h, will be provided according to city requirements.. 1. Street Dedication: Three (7) additional reet -111 be dedicated. along Helms Avenue as ultimate street right-of-way. a. Parking Sign-, 'vo parking Any Time' sign lattalled on all street frontages. the specified . program is vary aspen live and canples, tho *weer would 1:`_e to imrlt, ant thit project In lac phapas: Phase t: Construction of the kb squaro feet to take place imeedlatety. due to the owner's nie.s as wait as to avoid the rainy season. Otherwise, construction would have to be d4loved for many months or up to a. year. Phase IIz wale Scroeni.Ii /Streetsaaping: "Ines iaplam atatiou of this program. will require engineerIml drawings to be reviewed by muny c n v agencies and Surety send approvals will take quite a bit of time. as saw :,to aware, we are anxious to cawnence this .program and we toques, our ass). tonce rasardlag these matters. S"uld YOU have my questions., Duane feet free to contact us at your varltest convenience. R�t}\pect(gily, CAIK IA i AS S dg ITFCTS ����YI 5 EHGIh7'E ERI 1a' R. C AIA , Alba t `►r)nclost President cc: File )RC /crI 1 OF -4 N .ss CUC MY OF RM1CHO CUCAMONQA Joe 23, 24Sa Original POO', Quality b�">r.a.,.0"W�C4* 40A 11M .�14jj ►t'• do 6srcft 20723aArroee��rsute, 9afti 6Qe A,ncho r.�arae>xega. cA str3c Deer W. Gantt: Your tppifcattoe was reriww b„ rk, RTansieg and in9tneertng 6trlsfen Ad duns prior, to a Lf;ted bar % aro the CCZMW*s which 0004 to be address prior to epprova2. plennihe l91rt *_teat; 2, Th1warr. Mrg additic"II stale am EI ptrkin0 spictt, t, Thr, a %isiin9 saerica yard shoaid ba sereenad -INN Delis Arinus, Foron 9oo.waN. and al the auth:re aM wlafa prtaperty bc"ftfy' Street. trm Use 4 bM ~AW iR thm Arms, Enatrasrihg pf.ision• 2. $haer sxitttng unit 10 a. the HU IN& Alts. reran• to the attach" i s�irete dreut "Mi WiftY Amiternts• hsedaut ant +* ➢rr $Oct,, i of the haedsat, 2. Shoes et i axistinq drive appmathes. 2sI—U- 2. Lot If M-3 cannot cross buil0b". A Tot lift Coustsrnt to ccttsolidate the 'Me wxfstfhp parcels will be rerirad, Thsnfohil, the sAttre site is to msiderrt as tee (1) lot is M ;w to tie coeesseets far ttfg pre set. 2. lfre developer 0411 caeestn"t:ae foila ih$ street i•FrcvaaAOU. a3 Sfdmlk a0weet is vitisatte rffht+5f -kvy eI s �drfre : lattatw). RRroachts to City $404r4 1M: 30 di Strsat lio t. 3. Ali adMtlaeal 3 feat of dedieaLiae far shat ripen. A* is rmirad we Holm droaea. S. °t parking A be festallad an street fro taoss. farMAftlea%f a ANd �Mp AN M7- m oad subrft the reettfrad do(Aw'U ei1 ffapfftetdetp Ddaisfas review set p "V& . trail { le�Wwlast�r �aasitass pTesse contact re At 9n-l"I or Urban ay? at Agp.2a�#. Sfatarlly* f E PkAARIRRI{Y Rej��dd°�'`�� �e Asssfitee Imm V4160M ttt A. Y. Uariee CITY OF -T- i �_e 4 PLANNT- DIN l A 1:3 .3��-.Bq-.�p;�a'LpA"�r yr� G/�d¢e�p� � +�I J. ki RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAI CALIFORNIA APPROVING MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 89 -07, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 9TH STREET AND HELMS AVENUE IN 71iE GENERA. INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN (SUBAREA 3), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209- 031 -53 AND 54 A. Recitals. (i) A. W. Davies has filed an application for the approval of Minor 1'evelopment Review No. 89 -07 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in thi.3 Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On the 22W, if March, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga cond;cted a duly noticed public ;gearing on the application and concluded said ',rearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the aaoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1. This Coinission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and corvort. 2. Based upon substantial evide ~.,^ presented to this Cdanission during the above- refere nced public hearing on March 22, 1989, including written and eral st4ff reports, this Commission hereby specifically fir4s as fol1ews: (a) The application applies to property located at 8737 Helms Averpae with a street frontage of ±870 feet and lot depth of 1191 feet and is presently improved with a building contractor's office and storage yard and partial street improvements; and (b) The property to the north of the sub jec t site is industrial buildings, the property to the south of that s to consists of industrial buildings, the property to the east is a single emily residence and orange grove, aid the property to the west is an industrial property. -T- --?3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. MLR 89 -07 - A.K. DaVi'_s March 22, 1989 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to °his Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed project will not be detrimental to the goals and objectives of the General Plan; and (b) That the Proposed project, together with the conditions appliicablethe thereto, injurious detrio ntal to the public health, safety, or welfare, or s vicinity; and propertie or improvements in the (c) That the project is in compliance with Section 17.02.130 of the Development Code, pertaining to .;on- conforming uses and structures. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this `Commission hereby approves the application subjer,: to each and every condition set forth belots and in the attached Standard Cond 'iins, attached hereto and incorporated ha min by this reference. Planning Division 1) The applicant shall provide a total of thirteen 1'13) parking stalls to be paved, double striped, ind located within a parking lot which meets all applicable City Standards. 2) The storage yard shall be screened from public view along 9th Street through the use of walls, fences, ard/or berm. The proposed screening shall be reviewed and approved by the City Plainer and shall be instal Ud prior to occupancy release of the office addition. The existing chain link ferme along Nelms Avenue shall be relocated behind the street right-of-way and shall be irrigated and planted with vines at a mininuma of 10 feet on center. En i°reeri,j Division 1) The applicant ;hall submit a lot line adjustment to eliminate the lot line that crosses the building prior to issuance %:f building permits. 2) The applicant shall provide an additional 3 feet of aedication for street right- of-way along Helms Avronue. ;�" --?(I PLANNING COMMSION RESOLUTION NO. MDR 89 -07 - A.N. navies March 22, 1989 Page 3 3) The applicant shall install "No Parking Anytime" signs on all street frontages to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 4) The applicant shall construct the following street improvements for veron Boulevard, Helms Avenue, and 9th Street. a) Sidewalks adjacent to ultimate right -of -way.. b) Street trees. c) Recinstruc: drive approaches to City Standard No. 306. The City Engineer shall establish an extended time. schedule -for the construction of these improvements_ prior to issuance of building permits, security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public street improvements. 5) Street improvement plans, including parkway trees, sidewalks, street lights, and drive approaches prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the Cit Engineer shall be required for all public streets prior to issuance of an encroachwent permit. 5. The Secretary '.a this Commission shill certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF MARCH, 1989. PLANNING CONNIMON OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: 13rrY T. W8151, chairman ATTEST: Brad u er, Secretary- � � PLANNING COMMISSIO?f RESOLUTION N0. MDR 89 -07 - A.W. Davies March 22, 1989 Page 4 I, Grad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucaranga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly fntroduced, passed, and adopted by the Rlan,ing Coemissiov of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd ddy V Marvi, 1989, by the following vote-to-Wt: AYES: COMa?iISSZNERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Ell 4 d z v w a J E Ni i r a gg ��'a$ 435 y Y Oa hiss O S r� ��r• ��ogfr' =ca a �t a dry ^ Q �a �ryy ri �0 L 4 • p'� q G O mW 91-121 rf r- �� r r$ I I, L .211 T Sol yr p Mw5 8 O O�Y6 a a F 91 �3a no�u S c YYd N�_ _S 1ti. p I. $^ a I <a �^ fit q W� F `y. jig � d •>.� F 1� qNy� ti r� 4 e C5. lj! 3gs� s x�s C O � S m�Ntgtd Q� YC a S 6 +`�YI 3y��S �aga� lg�� 33 :fir= � i LO €�sE 6 n+ Y - aM- s +��a dr gw� «w C 2 OOv � OY C �3a���do54 �s�� �•s 3Yos #mid= O +�YYL «T w » F•aYO u I i i « Y S w il sw a •�: MR s o• � pz� M �_ N w�i b i Fi »O I I I �Yr a��vN s s 6 tl y O! M IGH OP i k eras p v sit. �r • s _ MF g r es � 1131 UR i 0131 I1 u jig r� �s � p s _r r= 3 =! �a i I -V _ N-V :.� �_ s c =Ns 863 _ 3 « af.f I .-: ._+2 X :$`3C 93�» sib Y %t M I grif 4RkIc ,3'. c Vlxc + ° �iCw i rs" a� s s o •s H q ca O n O I Q A V a NIS sss OLd 9 y I.. •�7 `J 04 `=.•S �O S�� yyyY ��Y�yy � M � �_y� V+ Y •• � N ■�6 � Q � . Ty VTC Y. 'N`� iN ��Ca a L LF- Eq 53. »84 oocpoe »� f »K�� 'In SL IAw fy �i aiN L{++N L! r' G «Y y ta• -' at N LE S IN�N�':. lam p p— YCy YM O a ^M Or �Qq .�ig ±a `$�N M ^. & +YlyN i iQr GO a LS. MM V s0 A� �j_j HE 1 N 10• 14 O OBI �.®ViI es I 21$ is s = mar g s r •i s ?c sus= 3= M�K� 3 as ` • NXf. 66 _ .23 ! a -I O ,;a Eli L n �g ; S $ y3 =S 6t sL jecY «� L"� w� � � S t y �•f. �3�� �f w S ■i age yyram�` yells �w —31 3% f 2 Finy O.>♦ M mil' � O� i • Ii f 6�3� *■�3y ��� ^99�� "jj Z�� pi�j�j SY � ��'La�L.Q� aril: � h P •p) N P1 f' 111 Y m` g TL 3� Yana • Y age^ all O I�tlw V IQ It ^tap ' 6°Ii t3 151:04 Ti rj �1 y iiii e= TL8 r aIi 24 ° if Np Or Y �iy���S�yyy �1 e..YY1�.. LL a L MR iM ,1Yv co CY 0 CL cu I M c� I!!�dQyy�d 4 �_ Ve^. _ Y9$ •ooL ter 1. tit �'d. � � d C ye�w�. MN ��Y � � f ■t � i alas aa$ uq� sfi�3� a� +IiB.T c qw M m$Gro `'a° rY3 $ {�yqS �pp oo'a�u4' g u+ gyp ^Z yC fig "a Aix 2 Jig ROLZ �^`+uE sa .`. _.+>x a tdu ^33 "^ "qi Y N qa yyp. P.a ^ r f,6� w 3 yY Y 4 # Y I. 9 M 'Y Er Y'.RU1.'s T` L » a a M ¢ u Mu .1w S-ers- quis r�y N v N J +�,00� �! q�w ��" NYMN Cqi Mo 00 .yp lit " " s G 3 TL y " o a a +. %s " TL I f r�+ :a Y 46 a Sad^ i'J wY: fir' C I ��. -lit Y lit~s M _�+ Y i ^.� �3 0 zz �u'1 _ .-`.I Ire �s. " RYw rs ^ �1 ail ! sv �� -96 cv s J's a 6,` Y .�» A 4 I 1 I ��1� I E y01 �j � � � � •� yy�� i S4g'�tibo i c$�T r�Srr X !a'i s ` a +� 0 yC i bM ,�tlC �qM {V� x➢ .R FF ^' � { ��� � rq Jpoi 1AQSq .Z :- Oqu (A dP�rl MM'. L F _ i u'g13�' 8ffi'tgg ¢J23: yK $y 0121 TA-11 s ., € TTL day[ 7 S O balls ja -I Jill 91 t K M bi - M 14�tl� �9 *9 ■F� �j e W r 4 '�` A� �p.01 f �� 1 a �P�y}iqt ,_►a'E $�'t4 pI" w `ry p�y II 6s /6rY �' ��°� Be� V �. � i 4 is tayiq rd CY O . q \Y e� l' i 0 x c~a us d a MY`� ti w�SG y6 � ����Q Q�C N •y A � w V w sit w g Hit pp, a p �,• A N "VYV 44 Y.WM N� �j 4- — oS� i ` t Ems. Sal ~ °3 u Lb In y�' 2-1 ew % -o S — i TTJJ ��eiZ 7� WNN ep L NRR� — x s 0 Y s �V III I s =� N� VD QN- isii 4�3� 3A u` v �3 Aw O— rs aVa Cg O wnO l � i • �V • AV Nl�N it �• O� M iii' ^mN w�•W• t. �.~ N �NL r3•r¢ u$ �L h M NP w.. •f• ± �i 6tNy _ l77 tC 0 d R3 e� El u It M� w y a• • Q I:I a; �i all i W w M J • H 0 Y s �V III I s =� N� VD QN- isii 4�3� 3A u` v �3 Aw O— rs aVa Cg O wnO l � i • �V • AV Nl�N it �• O� M iii' ^mN w�•W• t. �.~ N �NL r3•r¢ u$ �L h M NP w.. •f• ± �i 6tNy _ l77 tC 0 d R3 e� El N 4 W 2 w W R gs s °a `off �5 0 oa «� w° $u� �o Cud �dm a^ Sig 6 O yeaa q+ I MZO rC gvp �0. Y v OV° �MO I i�il I 1 01 O \V L VE06i �O� •1 6� • ° •D �.� •� L�M'L.�fj y « oriSy Y _ ri : S = y• ji Mal Sin 21 V-5 ons 6. 26 2 SAN IL °� ♦y M ��yr �• �V .�w Li O .`� Ste. a U7 V• 1� O = A N ••1 701 PI ! VI n E 0 - MY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF ,DEPORT DATE: March 22, 1989 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, tatty Plar.r�r BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Manner Gt}Qlkl. t d O F U a 1977 SUBJECT: MOD F7rATION TO VESTING 'i WATIVE TRAcr 13823 - DEVCAL - A requesz: to c ange a prevtot017—anprove tract map from Tone- lot subdivision to a five -W, s6division for the development of 265 condominium units on :%9 acres of land in the Medium - High !Residential District (.41 -24 dwelling units per acre), located east of Haven AvenLo on the south side of Lemon Avenue - APR: 201 - 271 -R79. I, ANALYSIS: A. eneral: On March 23, 1988, the Planning Commission conceptually , artwed Vestin7 Tentative Tract 13823 as a one - lot subdivision for c„ndominitpm purposes. In addition to approval of the subdivision map, the applicant also received approval of the conceptol site plan, cnnr� tual grading plan, conceptual landscape plan, and building e1 kaEions. the applicant now wishes to modify the original approval from a one -lot subdivision to a five -lot baiviRie:., ho changes are proposed to the grading, landsc'nping, archiv�r.ture, or unit plotting as approved on March 23, 1988. Exhibit "S' depicts the new location of the lot lines in , cation to the site plan. B. Compliance with Vevelopment Code: After receiving the request for the mo ca on, staff reviewed the project.. for ':ampliance with current standards. Staff has found that the project ie in Lompliance with the Development Code with cne exception the one bedroom units man 1? proposed are 535 square feet in area. The Development Cod: nLw requires one bedroom vnills to be a rinimum of 650 square feet. These units comprise 47 (17 %) of the 265 6otal units proposed.. W th the modification request, the Planning Commission does have the Authority to require the units to be brought up to current standards. This would require the applicant to redesign throe of the buildings. zTBM J PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT RE: VESTING TT 13829 - DEVCAL Marco 22, 1488 Page 2 II. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Thz madification is consistent with the enera "plan ar,.�`-ge—velop.grnt Code. The modification will tiof be detrimental to the public Pikalth or safety, ur cause nuisances or significant adverse enviroxiental impacts. In addition„ the proposed modification, together w7th the recommended Conditions of Approval,, ai, in compliance with applicable provisions of the Development Code and C;r; standards. III. CORREFPONURCE: This item has been advertised in The daily Rea:)rt newspaper as a public hearing, the site was pos ei-a, and —nom were sent to all property owhers within Sin? feet of the site. IV. RECOMMENDMION: Staff reccmmends that the ?tanning Comtission approve a :no :fication to 'Vesting Tentative Tract 13823 through adoption of the attar�ied Resolution with Conditions. However, shoulil the Commie ion desire modifications to the one bed,,00m units to .omply with current standard;., then it would be app�priate to c.intinue this iteut for 90 dais to 31low the applicant -Zi go to the Design Review Committee for approval of the chaFtges. Resper Oly su d, Bra r City P1 ner 80: SM: ko Attachments: Exhibit "o-1" - LetAer from Applicant Exhibit 03" - Subdivision Map Resolution of Approval with Conditions <. ` 13 Ell EVCAL Industries, Inc. JOIL fo 1800W M=a a Ava. See 800 ;.bank. C.'4=a 91505 Teo (W) 848.5600 FOX(818)G43-4809 February 28, 1989 Mr. Scott Murphy Planning Division City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 C Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Vesting Tentative Tract 13823 Deax Scott: The subject tentative ma.) war originally approved by the Planning Commission as a one lot sutdivision. We are hereby •equeating an amendment to the tentative -.11anging the one lot to five Xots, as shown -on the a plan. We are request-, ng this amendment due to requiraments placed on the development by our lending institution which severely limit escrow closure or. the sale of the individual condominium units. Please review this request and schedule approval of + ammendmeat on the next 7-13anning Commission agenda (r 22, 1983) as per your cro ^_vF;rsatiota with Barbara Hall c ,peg. If you have any furtnar �cjuestiaa s please feel free to call. We appreciate your assistance and cooperation on this matter. Very truly youri, Alta Loma/D.X. Joint ventures by DEVCA.L ndustries, Inc. Richard B. HiaLnberg RfB:sld J cc: Shintu Bosh - City of Rancho Cucamonga Barrye He. -xi - City of Mmnch�3 07ucamorga Barbara -all - Dwight Yrench & Associates attE. ch . 11 11 M, 4N, ■ ■ ■ will., tt 9: ! T z; RT a RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION er THE PLANNING COMMISSION Or IME CITY OF RANuHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13923, A REQUEST TO CHANGE A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TRACT MA.A FROM A ONE -LOT SUBDIVISION TO A FIVE -LOT SUBDIVISION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 265 CONDOMINIJM UNITS ON 19.9 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM- HIGH RESInENTIAL 0ISTgICT (14 -24 DWELLING UNITS PER JRE), LOCATED EAST OF HAVEN AVENUE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF LEMON AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDTNGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201- 271 -79. A. Recitals. (i) Devcal has filed an application for a rwdification of Ves`ing Tentative Tract Map No. 13923 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subje.t Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On the 22nd of March, 1999, the Planning Com.ission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly ,noticed public hearing on the application and concluded nand hearing on that date.. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Rcwlutior, rave occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THERE~�PP, it is h? eby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City ui lancho C,icamnga as follows: 1. This Commission here' jv specifically finds Chat all of the Facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and -,orrect. 2. Based upon substantial evidetice presen�ed to this Comission daring Oe above- referenced pu'.;ic hearieq on March 22, 1989, including written and oral staff repo! ^ts, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically find!, as f0llft7l (a) The application appl?es to property located on the south side of Lemon Aveme, east of Haven Avenue with a street frontage of 667 feet . and lot depth of 992 feet and is presently unimproved; and (b) The property to the north, east and vast are designated for residential uses. The properties to the novth and east fire currently vacant. The property to the nest is presently being developed with condominiums. The property to the south is designated for the future Foothill Freeway and is curre fitly vacant; and PLANNING C"ISSION RESOLUTION NO. RE: VESTING TT 13823 - DUCAL March 22, 1989 Page 2 (c) ThLe modification, with the recomended conditions of approval, complies with all minimum development standards of the City of Rarir;ho Cucamonga. z. Based upon the substantial evidence preseitted to this :ormission dvrin3 the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Cowssion hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That modification to the 'tentative Tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, aFd specific plan%,, and (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (c) The site is pflysically suitable for the type of development proposed; and (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage end avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and (et The modification to tb,- tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and (fD The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. This Commission 'hereby finds and certifitis that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliatt�e with the Califhrnia Environmental Quality Act of 3970 an,4, further, this Cammission issued a Negative Declaration on Marsh 23, 1988. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission herby approves the applicatioh g- .tbject to -cch and every condition set forth belie and in the Standard Conditions attached i'Areto and incorporate4 herein by this reference. 1) The developer shall previd� each prospective t buyer written notice of W potzntial F-jurth Street Rock Crusher project in a standard %ormat as determined by the City Planner; prior to accepting a deposit on any property. 2) All conditionit as contained in Resolution Ha. 88-50 shall apply, PLANNING.C(MISSION RESOLUTION NO. RE: VESTING TT 13923 - DUCAL March 22, 1994 Page 3 6. The Secretary to this Comission shall certify to Vae adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22N5 DAY OF MARCH, 1489. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Carry T. McNial, Chairman RtTEa`''. ""`Brad Buller; ec re ry I, Brad 80ler, Secretat -/ of the Planning Commission of the City of Ra ncho CucFmonga, do hereby -certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, rni adop�l `by the Planning Comission of the "ity of Rancho Wcarwnga, at a regular meting of the Planning Comission held on the 22nd dAy of !arch, 2989, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COWISSIONERS: NOES: COWISSIONW, ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: s CITY" OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT C << 1 L is : Z U�_- 1977 DATE: March 22, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Eullr!*, City Planner BY: Tom Grahn, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONi ?EiNTAL ASSESSMENT AND VESTING TENTATIVE TR -ACT- - PANNON DESIGN - A residential subdivisien anddeex gn rev ew of .sin`yTe family lots on 9.2 acres of land in the Low - Medium Residential District (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) located at '.ire scutheast corner of Lemon Avenue and London Avenue - APN: 201 - 251 -21 and 22. Associated with this s Tree Removal Permit: 1b. 59 -12 I. BACKGROUND: The Engineering Division conditions of approval recommend thee -4-ave--g+ven- the following direction regarding flee proposed sewage and access easement on Lot 41: S1oA d t,ce developer not be able to obtain the parrcel located directly south of the proposed tract and incorporate it into the tract, access to it should be provides by a Lot A and not through an easement. The Lot A lioul'd then be paved and used for circulation and thus cannot be used in the ca,cu;ation of either the tilinimum net lot average or in the lot size of Lot 41. Lot A would be a 26 foot by 95 foot parcel totaling approximately 2,470 square .yet. The current proposal involves the development of 48 single family homes on lots totaling 288,684 square feet averaging 6,014 square feet per lot. Lot 41 totals 7,904 square feet. This total includes the sewage and access easement. Subtracting Lot A frcm Lot 41 reduces Lot 41 to approximately 5,434 square feet. By subtra ^ling L;rt A from the total net area of the tract, the net area is reduced to approximately 286,214 square feet. Dividing the total net area of the tract by the 4f, Lots, results in a net lot i size average of approximately 5,963 square fest. The tract would then require a Variance as it does rr:1t treet the minimen net lot average of 6,000 square feet. 11. OPTIONS: The following options may be consider.A; OPTION a ALLOW EASEMENT AS PROPOSED :. This option would approve to vesting tentative map as propus! with the existing sewage and access easement on Lot 41, No Variance would be required. Would require der ion of Engineering Condition #S,b.(2). PLANNING COMM13SIOM STAFF REPORT VTT 14011 - PANNON DESIGN March 22, 1989 Page 2 OPTION B - REQUIRE LOT A: This option would in staff's opinion requ re a Variance as s a ed move. Should the Commission select this option, then the project should be continued for 4 weeks to allow the . ioveloper to submit a Variance application. OPTION C - DROP ONE LOT: In discussiona with staff, the developer offered o e m na a one lot on Street "C" to achieve conformance with minimus average lot area standards. No Variance would be required. Staff would recommend a continuance for 4 weeks to allow the developer to submit revised plans for staff review. Should the Commission desire Option `S° or `C', then the applicants consent would be necessary for any continuance. Attached is a modified Resolution of Approval for the tract. i o�i'dii• ca. one fiave een g g e or easy re erencc A Respectfully submitted, Brad Huller City planner . BB:TG a,+l g Attachment: Resolation of Approval I RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVIMS VESTIMG TENTATIVE TkACT MAP NO. 14011, A RESI ENTIAL SUBDIVISION AND DESIGN RrV.EW 6T' 4S S'NGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 9.2 ACRES, AND RELATED TREE REMOVAL PERMIT fad. 89 -12, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHQ%ST CORNER OF LEMON AVENUE AND LONDON AVENUE, IN THE LOW - MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, AND WAKING iJNDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN. 201- 252 -21 AND 22. A. Recitals. (i) Pannon Design and Development has filed an application for she approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Mop No. 14011 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On the 22nd of March, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of - ,ancho CucanAnga conducted a duly, n(,ticed public hearing or the application and concluded said hearing on that date.. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoptions of this : esolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Comimisaion of the City of Rancho Cucasaonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically rinds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Rd solution are true and correct. 2. eased upon 4.ubstaatial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- refereiyeed public hearing on March 22, 1939, i.vluding written an(* oral staff reports, together with pubic testimony, this Commission hereby specifirally finds as follows: { (al The application applies to Property located at the f southeast corner of ',emon Avenue and London Avenue with a :street frontage of 628.35 feet and a laf, depth of 6;x3.82 feet; and (b) The property to ti9 north of the subject site are single family hoses, the property to the seuwh of that site consists of single Family r homes and apartxants (under construction), tha property to the east is va^3nt anal the property to the sr, t is vacant. 1 (c) The subdivision contemplates the development of 48 Luis a,teraging 5,014 square feet in size. A- --?--7 E E PLANNING COMISSION RESOLUTION NO. VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 14011 - PANNON DESIGN f3arch 22, 1989 Page 2 3. .ased upon the substantial evidence presented to this Comcission during the above- refeminced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set fortis in paragraphs 1 r-id 2 above, this Coission hereby rinds and concludes as follows: (a) that tentative tract is consistent with the Gecnral Plan, Development Code, and specific p1- s; and (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent wffa the Ganeral plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (c) The site is phdrsically suitable for the type of development proposed; and (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and (e) The tentative tract 'is not likely to cause _,. pious pubic heal Lh probIcAs; and (f) The design of the tentative tract, will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, €,)r access tArough or use of the propertf witl±ir_ the proposed subdivision. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been revieved and considered in compliance with the Califorr-ia EnvironmeAtal Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Cemmission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions sat forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 ab{n►e, this Commission hereby approves tie applitttion subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and irxorporated herein by nis refer- ance.. Planning Division; 1. The wall design along Lemnn Avenue shall be designed coapatible with proposed walls to the west and existing walls on the north side of Lemon. The design of the wall shall be submitted to the City Planner for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 9 PLANNIN% COMISSiON RESOLUTION NO. VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 14011 - PANNDN DESIGN March 22, 1489 Pale 3 2. Sid* yard J-return . yAlls shall be de igred with material consistent with the' house design, extending the wall from the house to the property line. A setbick (from 3 to b feet) shall be provided when a change in wall wiateri0 occurs. 3. Goth chimneys on Elevation A2 shall be brick. 4. The stone element, air tot chimnel base of Elevation C2 shall be t1derAd by one W fobs. 5. Abe stone veneer shall be a natural stone and not a manufactured stone. 6. The Tree Removal Permit is approved subject to replacement requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. Trees shall be planted as shown on the LaMscape Plan to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Engineering Division: - 1. An in -lieu fee as contribution to the future underg,munding of the existing overhead utilities (taele ommunication aro Alectrical) on the opposite side of Lemon Avptiue shall be paid to the City prior to the approval of the Final Map. The fee shall be one -hale the City adov)ted unit amount times the len5th from the center of London Avenue to the center of ;he :Alta Loma Creek Channel. 2. The on -site public storm drain system shall be sized to include the drainage area to the west of t*iie sit( and shall provide for overflow protection. 3. The "private" rear yard storm drain system includ.'ng the yard drain.. -, shell be maintained by the property owners. 4. The developer shall provide flood protection along the east tract boundary as approved by the Floc! Control District and City Engineer. !f the pr rtiory of the ultiniuz Alta Loma Creek Channel is cos' ziuci*d. the Developer may m,tuest a tr.ree party agreement involving %te Developer, City, and Flood Control District to recover- the cost of the construction from future Flood Control Regional Zone 1 funds when they become available. In addition, tt� k'Devtl�e , ? uer.t a;. reimbursement agreer ent :to rjc �er aria -half t .cent {bf the eanstr;ctioir front the firt�trrsw d+e+r,, opaient a -n,the opposite side of the flood control dram*). 5, 44 foot parcel (labeled R.R. easement on the Site Utilization CA !lap) ,,Yong the south tract boundary: !`a ­ 2 p PLANNING COWISE�'ON RESOLUTION NO. VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 14011 PANNON DESIGN ' March 22, 1989 Page 4 K 11 a. The Developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the parcel and incorporate it into the project as sheen on I alternate "A ". t. If the Developer is unable to acquire the -parcel, access shall be provided to it as shown on the Tentative Map subject -to the following: (1) It shall be improved to include a.c, paving, 6 foot high calls on both sides, a drive approach on "A" Street, and gates on both ends (decorative at the north end); and (2) It !;hall be made a lot "A"; end (3) It stall be offered to the owner of the 44 .00t wide parcel; hcwever, if he does not accept it, a horreawners association shall be established for its maintenance, or any ,6thar a�l^er Live &ccepiz to' VW City► Engineer and Via tit , - Attorney 6. London Avenue shall be constructed from Lemon Avanue to Street as follows: a. Full curb *.o curb widths; and b. Sidewalk, street lights and parkway landscaping are rec!uired on the ;project side of the street; and c. 1we developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of the improvements west of the centerline from fature development on the nest side of the street. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED ANO ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF MARCH, 1989. PLANNING C"ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA14ONGA BY • Larry T. McNiel, a� m n ATTEST- Brad u I Fr, ecra -Wry k -3a PLANNING CCWISSION RESOLUTION 40, VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 14011 - PANHON DESIGN ' March 22, 1989 Page 5 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamon?a, do hevvby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamanga, at a rr;ular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of March 19E9, by the following vote -to -wit: DYES: COMMISSIONERS: HOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: I ILI CITY OF PLANO n CUCAAIONGA cA3C*^f0 STAFF 1Q.9PORT a V� 4 O F � � C: DATE: March 22, 1989 197 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brame Buller, City Planner BY: Tan Grahn, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL A.SESSMENT AND VESTINr TFUTATIVt TRACT' 14011 FARNON U resi-dential subd fivisi ra an es gn evi'5"-48"ssTngle family lots on 9.2 acids of land in tNe Low- Medium Residential District (4­8 dwnllinq units per acre) located at the southeast Corner of Lemon Avenue and London Avenue - APN: 201 - 252 -21 and 22. Associated with this is Tree Removal Permit No. 89 -12 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested Approval of the subdivision design, conceptual grading plan, building elevations, plot plans, landscape ran and issuafice of a Negative Declaration. E. Praiect Density.:- 5.22 dwelling ua'ts ner acre. C. Surmundiny Land Use and Zoning: North - : ngle family homes; Low Resident -al District (2 -4 �a eiling units per acre). South - Vacant (former railroad right- 0 -way) I single family howl, apartments (fancier c(tnstruction); Low - Medium Residential District (4 -8 dwelling units per acre), Vnd 'o Residential District (8 -14 dwelling snits per East - Unimpra,ied flood chrnnal, vacant; Low Reci dent! dl �istr'ct (2 -4 dwel:eing uni «s per acre).. Writ - "jingle f Aily hmes, vacant; Low- Me=qm Residantial District 0 -8 &oiling units per acre). C. Gener°sl Plan Desi. 9natiors: Pro {Rn2 Site - Low- I4edium Density Residential Forth -= Low Daresity Residential iTF 3 X 0701-02 03-221-89 PC Agenda Q 3 of 4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VESTING TENTATIfE TRACT 14C,21 - PANNON DESIGN March 22, 1989 Page 2 South - Low - Medium Density Residential, Medium Density Residential East Low Density Residential West - tow- Nedfum Density Residential E. Site Characteristics: The site currently contains one residence, m garages, and a storage building. The site slopes southwesterly I'mm Lemon Avenue at approximately 6' percent grade to the south property boundary at approximately 3 percent grade. Existing trees consist of approximately forty lemon trees, two eucalyptus windrows located south of Lemon Avenue and along the eastern property boundary, as wall as a small variety of other trees. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: applicant is proposing tc develop 48 lots rang ng�in size from 5,005 square feet to 11,634 square feet with an averago Tot size of 6,014 square feet. Four floor plans are propos4d, two with two elevations each and two with three elevations each. Plan A is provided 7 times and is 1,600 square feet. Plan B is provided 8 times and is 1,800 sgrare feet. Plan C is provided 16 times .?nd is 2,200 square feet. Plan D is provided 18 times and 1& '!,-110 square feet. Plans A and 8 are single story, plans C ant.xii a e two story. General Plan A3endment 89 -OIC was subF,itnd to change the Project area designation from Medium rr,i,;iwY Residential to Lour- Medium Density Residential; this war approved by the Planning Commission on January 25, igG'w�, and by the City Council on February 15, 1989. B. Desiqn Review Committee: The Cow.ittec {Blakesley, Chitiea, rrout, n tia y reviewed the project on January 5, 1989. The Comertttee did not recommend approval due to the following concerns: 1. The units should be redesigned so that the ass and proportion of each building is consistent with the specific design theme. 2. The units need to show 360 degree architectural treatment. 13 Pi -RNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VE.- '"S TMATIVE TRACT 14011 - PANNON DESIGN Marcie 22, 1989 Page 3 3. Materiels used on all elevations should be consistent with c6rrent policies, i.e., no manufactured stone veneer. 4. The location of unit! at the north end of the cul -de- sac, Street "C ", should be located to provide ;� more "open" feeling. 5. The wall along Lemon Avenue should be detA geed to f;y, consistent w,th the materials and color of exfsting walls. The applicant then revised Ute project based on design issues presented by the Committee. Further, the applicant met with staff on January 11, 1989, to receive further- direction on architectural modifications. The Committee (Emarick, Kroutil, McNiel) reviewed the project on February 16, 1989; however, they did not recommend approval due to the following concerns: Si to P1 z.n: 1. The wail design al,'ng Lemon Avenue should be designed to be compatible eith Tentative Tract 14125 to tho west and the wall along the north side of Lemon Avenue. Architecture: L The units on corner lots 7, 9, 22, and 24 should be of the "Mediterranean" Ftyle. This will allow for stucco side yard ret'urr wall, along London Avenue, Street "Br, and Street "C ". 2. Side yard raturn walls should be of a material consistent with the house design extending from the house to tha property line. Tigre should be a substantial :+setback (from ? to 6 feet) where a change in wall material occurs. 3. Elevation A2 should include a low brick wall that wraps around the left side elevation to the chimney. The chimneys should have brick veneer not shiplap siding. The brick element should be extended on the right silo elevation proportional to the left side. 4. On Elevation 82, the chimney and the front porch posts should have brick veneer, not shiplap siding, to match QV the low brick wall on the front elevations. V-3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 14011 - PANNON DESIGN March 22, 1989 Page 4 C 5. Elevation C2 shoule use a natural stone veneer, not a manufactured stone veneer. The stone lement should wrap araune, the right side elevation equal to the end of the roof on the first floor. The low wall stone element should extend the length of the front elevation below the window and on the left side elevation to the chimney. The chimney should incorporate the stone element to a height (approximately) of seven (7) feet. 6. Remove tho red brick from Elevation D2 and replace with a white brick that extends from the entryway and wraps around the left side elevation to the chimney. include a window shelf below the living room window on the front elevation. The shelf should be similar to that above the garage. The chimney should incorporate the white brick element to a height (approximately) of seven (7)feet. The applicant then revised the project based on design issues presented by the Committee. The Committee (Emerick, Kroutil, McNiel) revieweld the project on March 2, 00, and recommended approval oval based on the T011owing c— aanggs 1. Both chimneys on Elevation A2 should be brick. 2. 'The stone element on the chimney ;se of Elevation C2 should be widened by one foot. C. Technical Roview Committee: The Committee reviewed the project on January 3, , and again on February 14, 1989. Primary concern of the Committee cemdered on the 44 -foot wide strip of land located south of the project site. Exhibit "A" shows the relationship of this parcel, a former railroad right -of -way, to the project site and adjacent projects. This projv,,ct site is the last portion of undeveloped land that can logically absorb this parcel and without its inclusion in the development proposal the parcel could become a public nuisance. A condition has been included in the Resolution of Approval requiring the applicant to make a documented good faith effort to obtain the parcel and include it within the subdivision (See Engineering Condition No. 5). As the tract is proposed, access to the parcel to the south is provided via a 26 foot wide sewage and access road easement across Lot 41 (See Exhibit "A "). Should the applicant be able to obtain the parcel the lot lines in the tract will simply be extended south across the parcel (See Exhibit "B "). V- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 14011 - PANNON DESIGN March 22, 1969 Page 5 D. Tree Removal Permit 89-V The applicant has submitted a Tree Removal erm app U in rEquesting the removal of 23 trees in conjunction with 1,;e !.evelopunt of this tract. In addition, approximatel; 40 orange trees have been slated for removal; however, fruit bearing trees are exempt from the Tree Preserszbion Ordinance. The arborisw report identifier a nort,`htsouth .windrow of 18 Eucalyptus cladocal.yx (Sugar Gum) located along the east Four ary of the tract adjafent to Voo drainage channel as well as two others 'in the interior of the tract. The report also identifies an east/wrst,vindrow of 18 Euca1 tus globulus (Blue Gum) in the parcel located south or to project site. En addition to these two windrows there is a third windrow located along the norto project boundary. This windrow consist;ng of 13 Eucalyptus globulus was not addressed by the arbo -ist reprrt as street widening of .Lemon Avenue will require their removal,. The arborist report also addresses four other "Heritage Trees" Ak located in the interior of the tract. lhese trees are a. California Sycamore. a Fruitless Mulberry, a White Alder, and a Silver Maple. The arborist report has peen provided as part of the tree removal request and evaluated the trees regarding their overall health on a tree -by -tree basis identifying the following: 1) Presence of kucalyptus Longhorn Borer (Photiacantha senipunctata) in two trees. 2) Generally poor health, apparently because of the drought conditions, worsened by the raise in grade. 3) So,* trees have grown at awkwt,! ' rngles that increase the potential for large limb breakage. In seine circtances, poor structure has resulted frcm 01topping", which causes weakly attached sprouts to form. 4) Mardi trees in the windrow running north to south have developed a severe lean to the soreth because of strong Santa Ana winds. 5) The health ar the trees around the buildings is difficult to assess because no foliage is present. ,5' KANNING COMMISSION STX F REPORT W -STING TENTATIVE TRACT 14011 - PANNON DESIGN March 2E„ 1989 Page 6 All trees recommenJL -d for approval by the arborist report exhibit one or wire of the following conditions. pour structure, deadwood, trunk cracks, previous topping, severe lean, poor health, dead terminal wood, or the tree is already dead. Due to the present condition of the trees and given the location of proposed improvements only one tree, the Silver Maple, preservation See Exhibit "A ") Based on nd y staff and the ris report or his infomation, stoft' recommends that the existing windrow on the east tract bcuraary be removed. If the applicant obtains the parcel to ti+' 'south than the windrow within that varcel should also be r. +coved. In addition, the 'i:.'ees located on the interior of the tract, except the Silver Male, should also be removed. The- trees should be replaced with Eucalyptus maculata (Spatted Gm) in the landscape setback along Lesson Avenue, per the size and spacing requirements of the Tree Pre .3ervation Ordinance. II:I. EVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT: Staff has completed the Environm4atal Che .-klist and found no significant adverse environmental impacts as a result of this project. If the Planning Commission concurs with these 3,indings, Issuaace or a Negative Declaration would be appropriate if the testing Tentative Tract Map is approved. Ill. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The p"ject is cosasistent with the general Plan ard The Development Code. The project, with the added mitigation measures, will not be detrimental to the public health or safety, or cause nuisance or significant- environmental 'mpacts. In addition, the proposed use and Site Plan, together with the recommended Conditions of Approval, are in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Development Code and City standards. l¢. CMESPMENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in IN " 7p-aTry—Report newspaper and aotices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. -6 11 PugN' r comm1ssIom STAFF REPORT VESTI66 TENTATIVE TRACT 14011 - PANNON DESIGN March 22, 1989 Page 7 YI. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve vesting Tentative Tract 14011 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval, with conditions, and issue a Negative Declaration. ARe fully, tte �CB nner B8:TG :ds Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vesting Tentative Tract Map Exhibit-"B" Alternate A - Vesting Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "G" - Grading Plan Exhibit "O" - Alternate A - Grading Plan Exhibit "E" -- Landscape Flan Exhibit "F" - Building Elevations Exhibit "G" - Floor Plans Resolution of Approval C� 1 original Poor Qualky '411enb -JOOd !�► q ; �' it NORTH F XTEU:� 14011 RANCHO CUCAMONGA nTLz:Aj2M fltq- PLANNING. DIVISION _V-0f HIBIT -. SCALE. °�'"" Ll 11 Original Po ,r � - -.!jty dTY OF ITEM RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITL PLANNING , n r� ei a n I I jf I v r Milt hors •�H ivy 13VUL ZAILVIN81 ONIZZ.2N •1 d r 4R "r i F f �R 1 -1 Moo t t : tj i 1411 * •• �Si>tlt . t rte' C�4 ty�yi l� �s a� ■��t cti g 1 I �tl to i- 0 ►lj KI OVU InUv"as ow1192A s 11 .v. a s D" 0 wi EDE tTOiT 'ON iYM In .WYYb 3l111Y1N3t'JNIb48A i I I 1 � a u 6• Z � f Z - Li b -+ I( z � W lh 7 � r 1 0 t x a ar: *am WN d} ! .6vtx Snisvissi swum 8 w Cs CZJ E i 8 w Cs CZJ RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COK41SSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHD CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO: 14011, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION AND DESIGN REVIEW O" 43`oINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 9.2 ACTS, ND RELATED TREE REP40VAL PER541T No. 89 -129 LOCATED ; THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LEMOM AVENUE AND LONDON AVENUE., IN THE LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 2DI- 262 -21 AND 22. A. Recitals. M Pannon Design art Development has -riled an application for the approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 14011 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On the 22nd of March, 1989, the planning Commission of the City of Rancho, Cucamonga conducted a duly, noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date, (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined arw resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of honcho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the Facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission oaring the above - referenced public hearing on March 22 1989, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The ,application applies to property located at the southeast Corner of Lemon Avenue and London, Avenue with a street frontage of 628.35 ft and a lot depth of 535.82 feet; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site are single family haves, the prc:pertr to the south of that site consists of single family homes and apartments (under construction), the property to the east is vacant and the property to the west is vacant. (c) The subdivision Contemplates the development of 48 lots averaging 6,014 square feet in size. k -2-7 PLANNING CWISSI4N RESOU)TION NO, VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 14011 - PANNON DESIGN March 22, 9,9$9 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence pmsented to this Comreission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon tiT specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 abovo, this Comaissian hereby finds ari concludes as follows: (a) That tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is cons.stent with the General Plan, DevelOPment Code, and specific plans; and (C) Tht; site is PkYsically suitable far the type of development proposed; and (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to hums and wildlife or their habitat; and (e) The tentative tra!; is not likol to cause se"iouus public healtn problems; at-4 (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conf °ict With gny easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through cr use of the prapsrty within the proposed subdivision. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and consider -*6 i;1 c:_-spliance wits the California Environmental Quality Act of 1974 and, further, this Cowlssion hereby issues a Negative DeclaratY �. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every CwAition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division: 1. The wall design along Lemon Avenue shall be designed ccmpatibik. with proposed walls to the west and existing walls on the north side of Lemon, The design of the wall shall be subaitted to the City Planner for review and approval prior to t)e issuance of building permits. -2g PLAaNING C"ISSION RESOLuTlorl No. VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 14011 PAWWN DES104 March 22, 1989 Rage 3 2. consistent rrfth the walls se design, extending the wall from v--ft house to the property line. A setback (from 3 to 8 feet) shall be provided when a change in will material occurs. 3. Both chimneys on Elevation AZ shall be brick. 4. The stone element on the chirney bast of Elevation C2" shall be widened by one (1) Foot. S. The stone ver'-�er shall be a natural stone and not a Manufactured stone. G. The Tree Removal Permit is approv, -£ subject to replacement reguirersents of t,,,e Tree Preservation Ordinance. 'trees shall be planted as shown on the Landscape Plan to the satisfaction of the City planner. Engineering Division: 1. An in -lieu fee as contribution to the futUr+e undergrounding of the existing overhead utilitie• (telecoxaaunicatiorr and Electrical) on the opposite side of Lemon Avenue shalt be paid to the City prior to the approval of the Final Map. Tte fee shall be one -hclf the City adopted unit amount tines the tength from the center of London Avenue to the center of the Alta Lama Creek Channel. 2. The to -site public stone drain system shalt be sited t0 include the drainage area to the west of the site and shall provide for overflor protection, 3. The "private" rear yard storm drain system. including the yard drains, shall be maintained by tha property owners. 4. The developer shall PmVide flood protection along 0,e, east trilet boundary as approved by the Flood Control District and City Engineer. If thn portion of the ultim%.. Alta Loma Creek {3rMNI is constructed, the Developer meyt request a. three party agratMent involving the Developer, City, and Flood Control District to recover the Cost of the construction from future Flood Control Reg34g41 2090 1 funds when they become available. in addition, the Developer go request a rY:iebursement agrremeitt to recover one -half the cost of the cons ruction fri'e the future development ca the opposite side of the flood control channel. 5. 44 foot parcel (labeled R.R. easemnt on the Site Iltilitat'on Map) along the south tract bourAary; OK,, P '.ANNING CUMMISSION RESOLUTION No. VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 14011 - PANNON DESIGN March 22, 1989 Page 4 a. The Developer shall make a good faith effort: to acquire the parcel and incorporate 'at into the project as shoran on alternate "A". b. If the Developer is unable to acquire the parcel, access shal'� be provided to it as shown ,n the Tentative Map sit ject to the following; (1) It shall be improved to include a.:;. paving, 6 foot high walls on both sides, a drive approach on "A" nSt et, and agates on both ends Hecorative at the (2) It shall be made a lot "A "; and tai It shall be offered to the owner of ti;W 'VIE foot wide parcel; however, if he does not accept It, a homeowners association S�All be estabi shed for its . maintenance, or any other alternative acceptable to the City Engineer and the City Attorney. 6. London Avenue shall be constructed from Lemon Avenue to "A" Street as follows: a. Full curb too curt, width; and b. Sidewalk, street lights and parkway landscaping are required on the project side of the street; and c. The developer may repest a reimburse)vnt agreement to recover the cost of the improvements west of the centerline from future development on the rest side of the street, 6. The Secretary to this Commisslon shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED MO ADOPTED THIS 22HO DAY OF MARCH, 1989. PLPNIXING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: : cry T. el, Chairman ATTEST; Brad u er, ecre ry PLn34NING COWISSION RESOLUTION NO, VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 14011- PANNON DESIGN March 22, 1989 Page 5 I, Brad Buller, Secratary of the 'Planning Commission of the city of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that &v2 foregoing Resolution was duly ,aid regularly introduced, passed, and adopt-.01 by the Plaiming Comeission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular mewing of tle Planning Comission held on the 220 daffy of March 1989, by the following Vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: C"ISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: L$ wga`.wo ^uOY ip Y ti U.%_ i Al' =J up-.- wp � 44. maS"��xiq��$ �a���pIz ��s� « °at.bigi 4i$02- ..a3—z w n 2 N 6�u ands w'C.�� n s v \ I a H 4 H 9 b wa a Y U o+a q O GLp N..�� C6 U q V 6 N C YJ ip d sO� �E� tiu «gam =w 4 Y9 O unn. ,rS �e.G.a ^c� „Y qs �Ygr UM 7 C�Iz 3 ^ N .pay er O R .-.S . Y N�.� 6 � ri 2.5- P, R_ aSs 129 4�$ � ` PtFT� �{•• V p Y �. T: AHS i 2 ZZo: e3 N sY� P l$ a N tlYOY dyY O wUi3 O� \I T� lam' 0 .to 0 H v Y rc > Sao p q w q s i � M �rr•• Q � M 1 C l ddyey V ��. �aw � N gib. J II PI i �{•• V p Y �. T: AHS i 2 ZZo: e3 N sY� P l$ a N tlYOY dyY O wUi3 O� \I T� lam' 0 .to 0 H .s CY�Z c�nEi O1Y b�O��Oa�C � xa��. u� osgy4gu! 933$ji 001 M Y YYr� � ug °� y 4�4r ffia ay n C� Y 9L OC�`NL� °a ��AOgpqa�a 03 a�� N6 �pY q M> a Lv! s i e <4 2g n <isdY Ha I- N a 6� W 3i w S YTiYi t t1Y 6 V�b ►V�� �4 d _ Y 0 ^V� O! °t G iwil�NN aL.M ���RXyY A MM�CCy � tl L••. �� O f/. � oM`s a� $ �� �� i •'lid 3 IL - g @ a� °o ag on se M s Y;.gN � �� .� Y�' • RR s+ garAa C3 iY`°{{,,�� •�� S. Sol CL ! 4 S O! 4 a m e =24 Elf Yb • © L'Mw V YYr� � .rQ f441� ppo WL y ay °a ��AOgpqa�a 03 a�� N6 �pY q M> a Lv! s i e <4 2g n N RI Q �I \.I \ '.! 'A M Y^ tl v► rMWz: a9 v�aa�p ii «,a sOL °IA S. -Ya °LK uMMooV y 6�.Y�N yy L �tl�_6w A " "yO gM � MMw� O^ a Ij N v A a �. E ai CY 0 0 0.. Nib L E 0 o�uL oago �o S ++byey �Y opp800�; H« Y6 +� O• M 3ti6 �yC ya' ^ ^�4Y ��O Y ^1"'C� CYY� O i1 ^ N + N D O N C Y. .� y a 0 O P 6 0 N 6 ^`• q gar 2° La�r�o�N « €� Yak N�SeE u'�eey'iilYio v44'^a 7..2C. CC pp y Y Yyp p rC ���' .rC.v vNOL O.N L `N.YM� pL tV YNny K q Qp rry11 ra C G co Y:. DYx ��aYU U. +aLwy NCO «�eC/ �41 wqwC L�al �� A ^Q CA •1. `NNp��i1NQ.6i OR ®�.g �i `a�V Vv/ p( 44 Y Y Yy e G +u+ C�,8 V - a Y` C Y ' J OLDO 6�� NFL LtCYI OC �8.N L0 Y�'�y «L. Y11y §f NCP /y O�! V }� ^^y Y.N E vYO Y ~ttYa YpMF M` ^qA Mp N w n� M EEOs^OOu `Eq'>$ ML NN Wo�N s N Yi p .` ^�pJ ■ _N wTCMO Y 4 Y C aN Naaa�^aaaw 4 Y rO[��� L�L i���N �M w�tlqµq` 1�Q� .N t o'�Gp ® � �9q?in�1C{1 >1 • 1�o a � xICU c' N—y 06 S ■ N0 p «t000�CL I Ns- KMnq. KM ��jj HMO In.Ni KN Yn•n. M201KN�.V +l q.wC. L <Y Is. q6N � q• N 10 1� @ .�N• 1 1 Y ` Yvee. EL! a ^1O C C^ 00 O�E Y pa CE: Sl p Qtr�p� T r C Y�`I N`6N �� Ngap N o� MyrO�Y« 3� pE- LC.HM� O Yy C C 8L ^+3 YipI M,.N,. OC; /nM 4 q C• r �_ V V M` d E L M O` N Y a TL pggqq.. N w � �� qV y OI.�j�( ^� O1 �w �M c wp�t!`�O Yyy A i� `6 � Va �a�q C� ^a�0 �C YM _MS yyy� •rs. qsc` ■ Co � /�. � �! � °YM�•= ! 3 Y q � L .�� a .�' $F CY^ + R~ � Vw� Vim_ qOy *�O �v• CCq EMS i `u e''.�sp' °p Nq« gLili� � w�i •�� Na ts. YY�'� � r 'is i ^M4p Y YGY■ ct ckauw a r u 4v «n <o�� ^s ®s ►Y.o� ¢u sv` �o�aee o e s Tk uUmsa2z W . \I \p A ..3 c� W mo=o �c�iv ,e ga�y$S{Sa ,x»p&F LAJ N O r L «C 6eL O~ Lpjbb +^»� 6s^+ $3n°� $$e Ol^ Q A^ Y O S Y Y m. tl0'i Ctl Cq�p� LC « �� u �� OY � Y��• u� N S W O C uz w� " G V C yy1 N .. C. y.09 � L Fr 3 ' +pO «NM'e.C$3^*�j Oyp COCA g: i SS`` L 12—A M 6 O N ®�, bit m ILI v rsis S?F irk sit_ 1: J= V mill IN NN �b ° fi b_ w sM ;�+ oSg u r, o vgCoQ 3& �gv+Vw <G� CY CL ca O `is + WS �TL Y S r L =g N 4 3 TJ•w0 IC � «Y M ram V O N yM 'j$� 3^ �p.N $VI ii. L yy + jga�a Mnyp.. ed ^ N «ipM �L Vj 4y6 8 g� e� �H u"S •' 6 � NM� HAS gg Ol^ Q A^ Y O S Y Y m. tl0'i Ctl Cq�p� LC « �� u �� OY � Y��• u� N S W O C uz w� " G V C yy1 N .. C. y.09 � L Fr 3 ' +pO «NM'e.C$3^*�j Oyp COCA g: i SS`` L 12—A M 6 O N ®�, bit m ILI v rsis S?F irk sit_ 1: J= V mill IN NN �b ° fi b_ w sM ;�+ oSg u r, o vgCoQ 3& �gv+Vw <G� CY CL ca O `is + WS �TL Y S r L =g N 4 3 TJ•w0 IC � «Y M ram V O N yM 'j$� 3^ �p.N $VI ii. L yy jga�a Mnyp.. '6 4y6 8 g� tggg.. A* w W C. I E a V Y N ii M yu M. u wr N A f b W i( NLC> A Qy>w Q1 r�I Q C I➢ tir 0~ LC ■ Y ■ pppyyy {fV.1 U rl�tt~ �YN C C 4L'w 1 L y G ■ CC 'ism. I w� -42 ra$ Asa r Np� MO � N Mir cc ga �� ragri Mps�` s 1N�q; NtleL' ,.'4444 g° �. .N. K °Mile. �,M��t ° e '3" $'�tl .N.$ `�i : >7F W MI a Ywi aY 4 Y j L tlr v1 -4 JIM V M >N M �q� CO 0 4 rwr r� i ISM �S'� Ny333SSSq�& N+s�%J o 4�6 Gy�6�{��♦>�� YL YCC� I�" �i q� y V � C v q G S Q" a q N = 1 N 6Y Mcc N M 8 t y 9 N O a`. ` µ Q1 GCC .G s Q Y Y. ^tl0iYyyy kI- q yINyQ` YM OV TC C r g Q µ-,&95�g M Y Y Y N C Q 4 D40'0 Gp aCtl .YG yiM� t,� i wRw. toP � a� a> Jg �� ^ 0 �L+�' N.V. Sol N r _J _�"y'. ■,"C : yr.i X1.000 � « T� � b O . a V Y N ii M yu M. u wr N A f b W i( NLC> A Qy>w Q1 r�I Q C I➢ tir 0~ LC ■ Y ■ pppyyy {fV.1 U rl�tt~ �YN C C 4L'w 1 L y G ■ CC 'ism. I w� -42 ra$ Asa r Np� MO � N Mir cc ga �� ragri Mps�` s 1N�q; NtleL' ,.'4444 g° �. .N. K °Mile. �,M��t ° e '3" $'�tl .N.$ `�i : >7F W MI a Ywi aY 4 Y j L tlr v1 -4 JIM V M >N M �q� CO 0 4 rwr r� d ij Sg b �a § M ici N Nq C =T ^� v S L M N M irYi vM 3 H �9yy IL \I \I iii.• L V Y y N M iz I %in a! E All f s Ir J i 0 ude on ME111 H.FJ,Faj11 `K_3� _4 .7 N a � OI L � $J E � b V � N ib C fq� r`► N �e L M Lir „ 7� N wi- g -- rW • is v 3 f � ^ t N y i .Ggp py O. f..Z 4C Zy.� EEp M \1 \I °a Ut i gi § »o V�y NW�� ^ ]fit e CC + yy CO -Wm! i 6 L r a �VVY.a fir Y v L N N Mr O 1 S A K S-13 `r L av � N L f A 4 LA \1 \I \I L._'a co CY 63N 1 N� ::w Ngif ocrf' „«N, Y O W' qL� Uw �4 �� NE gas C YY }�O�i «a'.S ~.S a�wl(0 �. vM-. 4y � yyaY pE•LY CN i°l Sf Y° N.bN6 `L yftl1N NLG Ow O' YyE• NyNr.ff G° fI ^b F.3 E �r L b. 'tea «yam -Cab , Q` �• X >^ 8 �� �e �e y w ^ ■ p$ IY LL �1 � � M O iL°, ^C EYpN YY YY zaz Lp LNii NW>�j YZ YsC O/ Y M-Yf19 t iqt Lye, OLY fI ^Y" 3^ T N 09 976 0'O 23-. i°. en yq+ p•• i0. � ^ b d ij Sg b �a § M ici N Nq C =T ^� v S L M N M irYi vM 3 H �9yy IL \I \I iii.• L V Y y N M iz I %in a! E All f s Ir J i 0 ude on ME111 H.FJ,Faj11 `K_3� _4 .7 N a � OI L � $J E � b V � N ib C fq� r`► N �e L M Lir „ 7� N wi- g -- rW • is v 3 f � ^ t N y i .Ggp py O. f..Z 4C Zy.� EEp M \1 \I °a Ut i gi § »o V�y NW�� ^ ]fit e CC + yy CO -Wm! i 6 L r a �VVY.a fir Y v L N N Mr O 1 S A K S-13 `r L av � N L f A 4 LA \1 \I \I L._'a co CY 63N 1 Cf'"J a E Y tl L s O tJ �r By �O V 9 N a" � L 4 C� e h Op W L M C � L Q r wig .1 �8, M b b CjO UY w J 1rL 4a4 2y3 L L O M O L � Qu tJ J CT c Y o L 9OU6 C� e$e A� 6Yu Y OC �' N.NL OYO d N � aZt o i9 \ \n D2py s. tly ni Y L6:p 3 o � P A M' M €o OI 4� du wy°�,a M63 4 aog Z�' M d �$ M aY $ tt J� yy�® 6.1. ?.a "r 120;?i .O qLl� R L j SS&ti` `u w $ V �o sibs SLR r u S v w NT � y fig° w �i �� Nu 16 � Y J� yy�® 6.1. ?.a "r 120;?i .O qLl� R L j SS&ti` `u w $ 3 �o sibs Sig M „M ii ail S v w NT � fig° �� Nu Np� rl q9 -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT o, a O A z U � Y DATE: March 22, 1989 lyn TA: Chairman and Memhers of the Planning Commissioni FROM: nrzd Buller, City Planner BY: Cynthia S. Kinser, Assistant" Planner SUBJECT: EINIRONXENTAL ASSESSMENT AN!) CORDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89 -03 c re to establish an arcs e within a restaurant Sacated at the southeast corner of Foothil'r Boulevard and Hellman Avenue APN: 208- 261 -25 and 26, I. BACKGROUND: The ippl: cant has requested this item be continued to the April 12, 1989, Planning ConCssion meting. The purpose of the continuance is to have a neighborhood meeting with the adjacent residences regarding the compatibility of the proposed restaurant and ,arcade with the adjoining neloborhooci. II. RECOMENUATION: Staff recomends the Planning Commission continue con on15T—fse Permit 89 -03 to the April 12, 1989 Planning Commission meeting. I Ata y to r BB :CK :js Att achments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from ° icant v ?TEFL L I March 16, Inn VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS SHOWBIZ PIM Tim, INC. ShmKStt Plzzr ROW •Chuck F_ Chm" 444I Wa4A�,;wt Foe%ay PCL Box is=?. lrwr,", Tx 7$015 2t41M i!$p9 Mr. Stott Murphy Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamnnga, California 91730 Re: Proposed Chuck E. Cheese Restaurant Foothill Village Rancho Cucamonga, California Vedr Mr. Murphy: ShowBiz Pizza Time, Inc. hereby requests continuance of the March 22,, 1489 public hea4*fng for a conditional use permit for an arcade at the above referenced location. Please reschedule it for April 12, 19$x, if possible. We ask for this time extension to�.Aeeiwith. citizens who are concerned with our Chuck L Cheese restaurant its tae above refer- enced center. Enclosed herewith are thirty brochures for distribution. If you need more, please call. Most sincerely, Alice Winters Vice President Direr4nr of Real Estate AWsso Enclosures Qb 0 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPOR I Y DATE: March 22, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission MOM; Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Scott Murpin+, Associate Planner SUBJECT: SAPPHIRE TRAIL - Review of proposed comra.nitiy trail improvements on the west side of Sapphire Street, south of Banyan Street. I. BACKGROUND: A. Planning Commission - November 9, 1988: On November 9, 1988, the Planning Commission originally reviewed the level of trail improvements that were installed on the west side of Sapphire Street, south of Banyan Street. After receiving all pLtlic testimony and reviewing a video tape prepared �; the residents of the Marble /Celestite tract, the Plant'.69 Commission determined that ti,* trail fencing should be removed The main basis for thiC recco:ftridation was the perception of ina lequate sight distance visibility created by the equestrian trail `enicir,y. Followinn the meeting, the Planning Commission decided to reconsider their action because the Commission felt they may have reacted to the issue of the trail fencing without proper input from the Public Safety Commission. As a result, the item was placed on the December 14, 1988 Planning Commission agenda for reconsideration. B. Public Safety Commission - December 8, 1988: 'the Commission conducted a hearing to receive input on the proposed trail improvements. After considering all public testimony and reviewing m video tape, the public Safety Commission determined that there was adequate sight distance visibility and the trail fencing did not currently pose a traffic hazard to motorists or pedestrians. Therefore, no additional fencing teed be removed or altered at that time. C. Planning Commission - December 14, 1988: The Planning Commission again considered thr issue regarding the level of improvements for the Sapphire Trail. After receiving public Wstimony and reviewing two video tapes prepared by the Alta Loma Riding Club and the residents of the Marble /Celestite ITEM M PLANNING COMMISSION SIR'F REPORT SAPPHIRE TRAIL March 22, 1989 Page 2 E tract, the Planning Commission determined that the width of the trail and extent of the fencing provided was appropriate for this area. D. City Council - January 8, 1989: The Council conducted a hearing to receive input on the Sapphire Trail issue. Aftar reviewing the recommendations of the Public Safety Commiss-ion and the Planning Cr.;mission and receiving public input on the proposal, the City Council, while expressing Its desire to maintain the trail fencing, oxpressed some concern at out the height and location of the fencing. As a result, Lhe City Council directed staff to work with the residents on this issue and to have those recommendations reviewed by the Planning Commission, POlic Safety Commission, and Trails Advisory Committee. I1. ANALYSIS: A. Meeting __� With 'Residents: On March 9, I989, staff met with res�dnt—s—OT "5ie"% —rF a /Celestite tract and representatives of the Alta Loma. Riding Club. As has been their position from the very beginning, the residents of the Marble /Celestite tract felt that the equestrian trail fencirg should be removed in its entirety. The Alta Loma Riding Cif% representative, on the other hand, felt that :he best solution would be to leave the trail fencing in its current situation. In the interest of working towards an amicable solution, horraver, both parties made compromises in order to try and resolve this situation. Based upon the discussions, the following solutions were recommended: 1. Use of a 3 -foot high, 2 -rail fence for the length of the project. If a stop sign is provided at the intersection of Rarble and Sapphire, the Riding Club representative felt that a 4 -foot high fence should be used. 2. Break points (removing one section of fence, 8 feet wide) should be provided in the farce between Marble and Celestite. The residents felt that 2 breaks should be provided betux -en Marble and the local equestrian trail to the north and 1 break between the local equestrian trail and Celestite. The Riding Club representative felt that 1 break between. Marble and the local trail should be provided. 3. The fencing location adjacent to the local equestrian trails between Marble and Celestite is should be reviewed by staff to provide adequate sight distance visibility. rn a. KANNING CO - WISSION STAFF REPORT SAPPHIRE TRAIL March 22, 1989 Page 3 4. The residents felt that fzncing between Marlborough and the south tract boundary should be reviewed 'ay the PUftning Comfnission to determine if it was appropriate to keep the fence due to aesthetic concerns Stith scale and ytiporticn. B. Trails Advice Committee: On March 15 1999 the Trails v sort' C%; a revleweed the reco%*ndation, compiled from the meeting with the residents and the Alta Loral Aiding C,W. After reviewing . thin informtion, the Trails Committee recommended the following; 1. The use of a 3 -foot nigh, 2-rail fence was acceptable in this location. A modified fence detail, however, should be explored for use City- wide. Z. NO break points should be provided. If the breaks are dee *d to be necessary, ant break should be allowed between Marble; and the local trail to. the north. The break, however, should kte 4 feet wide maximum. a, No additional sections of fence :should be. reouved. C. Public Safety Comissiunt The Public Safety r4mm+ission w e reviewing c i+ X at th-lir April 4, 1989 meting. ill. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recnMoends that the Planning Commission con" nside`r a` l l - rnnput on the proposed trail improvemento. After concluding tha hearing., staff should be directed to prepare a memorandum outlining the Commnissi,;,-Ws reco*�ndations that will be forward to the City Council for final ac.Jon. Res4PIE ly submnitted /City a r 9d; $M:ko Attacheoentsz Exhibit "A" o Fence Standards Exhibit "B" - Break Point Locations eo ►,-%.!Az> CIIY C PLANNING ! SM 171 11]", A we-a, f; w --, Vn /,t5 6WIW117-015 A4549 IAWAnWAV poz.,/z CITY a' ITEM.- 6,waEt9o.E j-z RANCED CUCANONCA PLANNINU DIVEM EXHIBIT: SCALE- NORTH f1 TI F ^" T A I" AT_TA r1T Trl A A�TA1�T.'. A STAFF REPORT h al z DA7u: March 22, 1989 ;JLL= t9» TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Cindy Norris, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13748 - GRIFFIN HOMES - e e, gn ev ew o u ng a eva ons and ae ai e s to plan for a previously approved Tentative Tract Map consisting of 10? single vtaily lots on 28.8 acres of land in the Loa - Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located north of Highland, west tf Milliken APN: 20141'1-55. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Act on eques e : Appro9al of plot plan, landscape plan and e evations. B. Project Density: 3,57 dwelling "nits per acre. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: or - Froposed single family residential (Tentative Tract 13857 and 13858) Low- Medi>m Residential Density 0-8 dwelling units per acre). South - Single family residential, Victoria Planned CoRmunity; Low - Medium Residential Density (4 -8 dwelling units per acre). East - Single family residential, Caryn Planned Community Nest - Deer Creek Channel; Flood Control D. General Plan Designations: Project Site _-_L0_W-MediLM Residtntial Density (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) North - Low - Medium Residential Density (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) South Medium High Residential Density (14 -24 r4elling units per acre) East Low Residential . Density (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) Nest - Flood Control ITEM N PLANHI% COMriISSION STAFF REPORT TT 13748 - GRIFFIN HOMES March 22, 1984 Page 2 E. Site Characteristics: The project site is currently vacant and has been 'roug graded. The site is bounded to the north by Banyan St, to the east by Milliken Avenue, and to the south by tre proposed Route 30 Freeway. II. AwALYSIS: A. Background: The applicant is proposing to develop the tower Iai previously approved'subdivisian map, Tentative Tract 13748. The upper half of this trat. (13857 and i3858i has an approved Design Review application by Srack NorRes. The homes approved to tEie north consist of a'mix of Mediterranean and Traditional architectural styles whereas the Griffin Homes will be an entirely N,aditerranean product. The applicant is proposing a total of 3 floor Dlans each with 4 elevations ail two -story with 3 car garages. The units will range in size from 2,180 square feet to 2,785 square feet. B. Design Review Coneittee: On March 2, the Design Review omm i rree t Krouti Mari ck, WVie1D reviewed the project and recommended approval subject to the following: 1. Windows on the upper left side of the front elevations should receive enchanted treatment which taay include modifying window shape, recessing, adding planter sills, trim details, etc. 2. Additional detailing should be provided on side and rear elevations, with particular emphasis on the left elevation. 3. Provide a►r additional decorative element under the gable on the - projecting garage of Plan 110F. 4. Modify chimney details between elevations. S. All driveways should be reduced in width as possible, in particular, long driveways should be reduced in width for the majority of their length. S. Landscaping, including trees and shrubs, should be provided between any side yard wail and sidewalk. The revised plans are scheduled for Design Review Committee review on Ma► ch 15, 1889. Staff will provide an oral update on the results of that meeting. K -a EI 6 PLANNING COMMISMON STAFF REPORT Tr 13748 - GRIFFIN MS March 22, 1,189 Page 3 III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS. This project is cansistent with the Development o e an the General Plan. The project will not be detrimental to the adjacent properties or cause significant environmental impact. In additions the proposed use and site plan together with the recommended conditions of approval, are incompliance with V.e applicable provisions of the Development Code and City Standards. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the "Design Review of the building elevations and floor plans for the 102 lots through the adoption of the attached Resolution and Con(4tions of Approval. RQrer ly s tec4, B Cer 88:CN :mfg Attachments Exhibit "A" - Site utilization Exhibit "B" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "D" - Elevations Exhibit "t"- Floor Plan Resolution of Approval ,1 : ztT ' C .� ±�i .104�s,I '� -.• „� IPA AR •~ ��� s . ! %ti-.ii a s: s 'Ri.e�•y�t t . fill 1 r MA ' Ir .tM wYR. NOM CIrY CF qty F-71 L-� 1' curem.erm v I TRACT 13Y48 DETAX" tA MAN 371v C NO S OrlYebaAYS NORTH rljk UrY OF ITEM: ,RANCHO CUCAMONGA -r mm.-Arg 8J.4AI �IPLANNING DIVISION Pxmm- - Azw.� SCALE: K I orijinal poor Quality. GlUfm HCMZJC .......... NORTH �+Y OF . RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: LA aXAPA- PLANNING DIVISION N-7 EXHIBff:fa, SCALE: MANNING DIVISION ITEM. 1)(-� EXHIBIT: &/ SCiTPt 11-1 ^x tiid` &I-, ~- Vila 0 Hillfit , -0� pr. If-vi MINI alki wimin "Te I I IL - 1 PIZ, t.a Eli 71 � mil ��-. �1 ������, �� ....... ... -1 Ll It, i �r man -Mmsq� , , itr in , , ; kolis ibm , _" im k - I OPRII.M. 1.1, a I ■ LA Hn 4:�YC }L9 Mfv M AU2r'L i 1��,11 nnm El pn I iN PL Fim. Z10 O E f� AZMWIV,i& N_is7o _ftew��, VI RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLU73N OF THE RANCHG CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT NO. 13748, A REVIEW OF ELEVATIONS, DETAILED SITE ALAN A14D LANDSCAPE PLA,tis, LCCATEU NORTH OF HIGHLAND, WEST OF MILLIKEN, SOUTH OF DAN AN IN THE LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) DISTRICT, MD MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APH: 201 -271 -55. A. Recitals. C;) Griffin Homes ha.' riled an application for the Design Review of Tract No. 13748 as described its the title of this Resolution. Kereinaftar, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) On lurch 22, 1989, the Planning Commission of t?te City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application. 0ii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution, C Now, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Pla my C(Mission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows. 1. This, Cammisyro►? ereby specifically finds that all of tha facts set forth in the Recitals, 'Part A, of this ROSOlution are true and correct. 2. Based uperr wbstantial evidence presented to this C-a mission during the above - references. meetv.,q on March 229 1969, including written and oral staff reports, this Crabissioa hereby specifically finds as follows.- 1. That the proposed pro3Tc3t is consistent 0th the objactives of the General -Flan, and 2< That the proposed etZsign is in accord with tt., ebjeetive of the Develmeent Code and the purposes Of -he district in whicre the site is located; and 3. 'iat the proposed design is lei comliarce with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and 4. That the proposed desigo9 together with tine conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ORT 13748 March '22, 1989 Page 2 3. Based upon the findings and canclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission nereby approvees the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attache-.1 Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated harein by this reference. Planning 1) Windows on the upper left side of the front elevations shall receive enhanced treatment which may include modifying window- shape. recessing, adding planter sills, trim details, etc. 2) Additional detailing shall be provided on side and rear elevations, With particular: emphasis on the left elevations. 3) Provide an additional decorative element under the gable on the projecting garage of Plan 110F. 4) Modify chimney details between elevations. 5) All driveways shall ba reduced in width as possible, in particular, Tong driveways shall be re6ced in width for the majority of their length. 6) Landscaping, including trees and shrubs, shall be provided between any side yard wall and sidewalk. 7) The developer shall provide eat;; prospective buyer written notice of the potential Fo�xrt.� Street Rock Crusher project in a standard format as deterbined by the City Planner, prior to accepting deposit on any property. 8) The proposed freeway wall along the south boundary shall be consistent with the design approved by the Vnnning Coimission on May 11, 19SO. Engineering 1) ThQ driveways for lots 1, 76 and 89 on the Final Grading Plan shall ccoincidt with the Site Plan. 2) 7be driveway on lct 15 shall be rele aced as lose as possible to the southeasterly property line. 4. The .Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Aft PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLiITION 90. DRT 13748 March 22, 1989 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF i+IARCH, 1989. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RMCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNvel , UhaiWn ATTEST: Brad Bul er, Mcretary I. 5rad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Comnissl *,n of the Cray of F.ancho gcamonga, do hereby certify that the fregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the fanning Commission of tt?„ City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a recular meting of the Planning Commission held on .Ete 22nd day of March, 1989, lay the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMU;SIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COK41SSIONERS: as Kl SHIMNS I -tulle ,paoAU•. 3 6' I.'i`t lld`M- w �v Y 7YYVwu ,�1A JY��yC'{py M Y�� ryYfiO:a �� V B q■ • � 6 pa���.yy a Q �wASS✓NpMg'�4A 3 4C yamr.` H 0,+ z l'u"a age °fa cs t .g ' 2t- Sun IVY p6�a�s �.( tC *+ g Poo L Vy y Ad & y V e 4 tS'� 4 N+ AY• w Sol �� 6 Lp p 1�a�1 Yr11ID C` w +tt. gy, Nw`r YYwr �N f i� ti nC gts4 E� tr WM 4 �i y a a 9 *a pi aA {.1 I 0 0. yy w r _ I +$fir 9fllit '+ ` r s �TS 44 4 �i y a a 9 *a pi aA {.1 I 0 0. A a 9 �0 h/ y_ g' 'L CO` ��ON i- � FpN �ppppppa3" .7"3� M�QO �Yg'1 z30��:� L F e r g gr g N p 3o'jl M-4 e +7i4 Z `:•y cu 0� i °L Y .' Zip L+ a 1n, `�'���5 •y r$Ise Np Qom+ gGG :� Q Y y ;5- . L a AS yopi�7� Sri i Sii Cr� - L �tS $' •84 v 'E'de s ? Z s� 4 � 9n.1 N` + _ R e vs_ J X.-z -b IT d 2 " Qn fly Fs O ;6� n "qa off Ap .7 47 ft I us lie- Y h. 1. m--ftj;,6 4Y gill - y h _ y f N z w- Fq KENN- 66 i 3ii i�0 ~ � d N i 4J e C1 9a M�Or�{I YM�y. `p�pYD =4; �• @{qq C��NU Ate. e � A q N • N 4 acs iliat291 ra a a�Y ZN •S ^4 •yoL ~QS �N N a Ls �LeM� - -n q�N yg� A Mill. i�1. Sri r b Nwp6:Y <Mw i'w SUMS h`a�� R7V� Ya' �tl�l� M yoMy Y^ p 4. � r~ti C � O ! • j M 4��ap ww @�G! sA Pops �L ^7� OnWi��F r p ✓ � i � p1 p 211 -3 i 24 M 6 i - m $� -M;o � 66 `.y 1g s Sit M « 4 M1 4 p' Y1 N � I ■ 7 8� g pg a gas lot .r+�Y •�', '�� Y � Mail � �S'� g°� S� ail '► t ", p .. d 44 ' q 4 lan p � ,r .ry s: 4 ryy P2 A Ma itV a= ' �U � r 21 f O 01 if- S-02 � rpr �ww N fM M lk �s w r z W jai Li '� g� s I Ft � v �I vi A�� ifR d 9y M F Y ea��s NI iC3 CY 0 CL W, O P El r, Q W R a Y Y N �a as I w L 21 illn au� u � M 22� 1 A L 0 IM s = �A Y � MI a3 g rd;� 49 a NA``� Y�O�1 Cry ONKC .�f L y Viiii 'yS �.,�. VVVC�yV E6�6yL_�{ypa�Yy Y pN >Yn. YV'•OS ^a.VOy O4VY, +Jrs{ `53. �px yT4 Y Erg; rs pf? COI^ q. .9M ;q �a yUi B.Za ��y $� a Y c� gwo C,w L, C °6 �.¢w Oi !s oul ni Y2 i M E Y N S• i Y w {� w K L L� Y S° 16 Y L" Y N_ Al �I �I .,a co CY 0 co ,� Ya ��• N�:V �i •v Y is • t p s ilf iY {3 N N --eT s y$A�, &fit ^� "�:�� s a tz Ss S 3a� c r CU x t7 uj 9 a��lu g��gai a W b D 2 pa ash as Eau a all Or a a i� NaN6�to eg`T I C ! ®�,R G r+Y_4 b yr• � u ��A� 4� �i3 tle^ C C ^ �N �s`•� •.. ®tli Y rr-! a' a a spay a s � a e a 41 vri a ••.� 2 S ml t Allo is i A_ M = �Q s "a 1+1a qy1q�j � 3rM b 243 S a -Sl I X2 a asdgs a Go all 2. = I is a AMR? wall i r� .»•� i.� o.`aa $t4 « a� b ate Eliy \V CY 0 0 a 3 u El E psi Z all g �" a a'e y4 0 �Y{ ° L 2� Ari$ w or. oL s N 9 �a. rg8� as &88 s 9; �ppyayyy g '- 03e whypp�� �QQ rsrsg� q `�{{.. ss .I.JaM �QA P2 .� « v p+ y w.; g� b In -it mica ^ - �''rp� $s °v it.. « �wv- 5 .a'{{yy M . s .QU 6> .5 • Meru g c •pwa I N J R� Its r rZs j sa a Y Y } .� v ku V «$ ! __ T Tt a « 3 ad i is i 3jd od S� E s� rf 1 w =: at niliiii sL MM 3+ 6 Sit rppI M RY yy M It rQM 1iL 41 C1f M w N N J R� ISO 4� • 1 M •.wI1 W� L it J 1 ' W dd co ` ^M H O Q- c� Its r rZs j sa a Y Y } .� v ku � 9I1 : J JI ad i ism 515+:x' : niliiii 11111 ISO 4� • 1 M •.wI1 W� L it J 1 ' W dd co ` ^M H O Q- c� Its r rZs j sa a Y Y } .� v Z a � � 9I1 : J JI ad i ism 515+:x' : dd co ` ^M H O Q- c� i rrpW�� a O t! V Y S y m� •L3 "ax •s� s# He v w I gra r _s. s = 25 S��= Sr ,. 1w �jP O� 0 o. co y a LEE s 6.s 4 � vyaM I � sus � Y � y s oM� p, il �-- -�--- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM014GA STAFF REPORT o DATE: March 22, 1989 J s TO- Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Ualler, City Planner BY, Chris Westman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONA1. USE' PERMIT 87-04- CRELISEL - The development Of a e9gJ - o0 d ro—mrclal s epP -n9 center, consisting of 30,770 square feet of retail shops and a self -serve Car wash, cube and tune, and auto detail shop, -n 3.8 acres of land within the Neighborhood Commercial District, located . at the soot, west Corner of Haven and Loma - ApN: 201;- 262-48. BACKGROUND; Conditional Use Permit 87-04 was approved by the 7 an`n3 -9- C`ommisslon un June 24, 1997 in two phases. Phase I is nearly complet-, and Phase II requires Design Review Committee review ,ax.d approval prior to the issuance of bullefng permits. Phase il, which consists of a coin operated car wash, a 'tube facility and detail shop, wai°,� presented to the Design Review "ow -ittee an March 2 and 16„ IS 9. II. NEIGH830"OOD JECTING: A pe..cion ,'�s circulated and a i 'iafil ° loaa`� was conducted cn March 2, 1989 by the 'applicant with staff present. Several E.,ancerns wove raised by the neighborhood which were not direc:3y related to design issues. Those concerns were: 1. The of-unt of traffic generated by the project on Leman Aver, *e end fl. speeds at which younger drivers drive an that street. 2. fit er3tahl$ shad schoa`} hus stcP directly across from the r'- �'ipnsed �r-oject. 3. k-sse generated from radius~ car wash ba a, and vacuum cleaners. 4. Hours of operatioet. S. SecuritY far, the directly patrons of the car wash, adjac9nt property owners frur. TTE t 0 '0701 --0 03-22,-89 PG Acienda 0 4 of 4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 87=04 - GREUBEL March 22, 1989 Page 2 E 6. Potential increase in cruse generated by the car wash. Other design- related Issues were: 7. The accent color on the entire project, Phase I and Ii. 8. the landscape /buffer treatment along the west property line, and which related to the security issue. 9. Views of the project from Lemon Avenue. Because there has been a great amount of public concern with the proposed prase II, the applicant has attempted to incorporate elements to address concerns raised by the neighborhood group. III. ANALYSIS., The issues raised by the surrounding property owners focused argely on the land use versus design, and the impacts of that use on the area. The use has been determined to be corn i!,tv0iit with General Plan and Development District designations b," the original approval. However, there are impacts from ttie use -which could be mitigated through design. A. Noises Noise will be genev,�tnFj by the washing activity, vacuums, and possibly car MOOS. A noise stugy has been prepared (see Exhibit "E ") whioa indicates that noise levels from washing or vacuums will be below those permissible in residential districts. However, to further address residents` concerns, additional measures could be taken to create a solid barrier by extending the existing wall height for sound attenuation between the properties. However, the adjoining residents do not desire their wall heights being increased 'or aesthetic masons. 0. Securit • Because there is a grade separation between the prelect s to and properties west and south, there is a concern for security. A solution presented by an adjacent property owner has been discussed which would use a combination of draught iron and plant materials along the west property line to create a buffer zone that is only accessible to employees of the project, (See Site Plan), The Design Review Committee also discussed the potential of securing all of base II after hours (at night time) with wrought iron fencing and gates. 11 PLANNING C"ISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 87-04 - GREUBE! March 22, 1989 AML Page 3 IV. E C. Visual: visual impact of the proposeu car wash, lube and auto �etail bays, specifically from Lemon kfirme, wos discussed at tha Design Review Committee. The a pYi:ant has proposed a landscape Pallette that would buffer the building, however, also allow For views necessary for police security surveillance. D. Color: A color has been proposed through a combined review of iii— ffiesign Review Committee; adjacent property owners, and tine architect. A sample will be provided at the March 22, greeting. nESIGN REVIEW COFNITTEE: At their March 2nd meeting, the Design Review' orfm Mee--TRT—cated that they did not feel comfortable discussing design isst +es until amenable solutions were worked out between the applie%at and the surrounding residents. The applicant responded that they would continue working with the homeowners to address their concerns and affered that they could place a Condition, Convenant and Restriction against the property which would specify hours of operation. Staff has reviewed this approach with the Cfty Attorney's office and concluded that the only enforceable oethod would be to enter into an agreement between the City and 0e applicant specifying certain conditions of operation or aAend b',a Conditional !teas Dapmfft nboOnw D®.4— The Design ReVew Committee is scheduled to review the project again on MarO 16, 198. staff will provide an oral update of their counts at the IV. REC"EMNUON: Staff recommends that the Comission review the n orma on provided and provide the applicant and staff with direction. 5Re l i eier BO:CW.-mlg /AL 0 '-3 PLANNING COMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 87-04 GREUBEL March 22, 1989 Page 4 Attachments; Exhi bi .t "A" - App rot gad Site Plan Exhibit "B" - Proposed Site Plan Exhi bi t "C" - Elevations Exhibit "D" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "E" - Roise Study Exhibit "F" - Petition 0, El W. I;_ muTm, Old I I'S I ( CITY OF Imt. j6vdf-&7--!Z* RAINCHO CUCAIMONQ�, SCALE-. original Poor Quality 51 21 W. I;_ muTm, Old I I'S I ( CITY OF Imt. j6vdf-&7--!Z* RAINCHO CUCAIMONQ�, SCALE-. , ' IMMOMM"F1 CH -FEY CHAFFEY PLAZA CARWASH COMPLEX Nt6tteRUrt . risaxinr . GeSas:sr411 1 w wraa.lw�s. Drew RANCHO CUCANQPig4 i +emwtll.r+urua�n � ki— 0 I I I mil.. i xarxpty uwf ff ••' �NT7!i i . Cdddd4A094E1 j0F }17Ig6+D �� � M :.A II qqI n n w ' y �f h y y7. rI i Y7 i f -I Ei { I { I TTTTT I ! _.per 4 11 I J jt a a r l i n i i i i r -� I �► { {_,� _, =1 sw�alna ►aa Pr-TT771 r>-�- Q I I I I U �I I a.' xxmrlwo►aaoxcxruaoLLJ_IJ I HI V6N 9THEET IMMOMM"F1 CH -FEY CHAFFEY PLAZA CARWASH COMPLEX Nt6tteRUrt . risaxinr . GeSas:sr411 1 w wraa.lw�s. Drew RANCHO CUCANQPig4 i +emwtll.r+urua�n � ki— 0 I I I � � 4 O� Ll -4 - Ic ��W'd 111 i C VEI DI O . CHAFFEY PLAZA CA€ WASH COMPLEX i 'co ! E ArcAtlMm • ►IAaatag • "9Wc S lurneari. rrlavarr: claao RANCHO CUCAMONGA. � U — -/ g r- 0 ZZ °� omacm ®oeae ®ea3eo ® ei r � a B� i° iil i�tt E� i OF I I N��� jjI p QZ P C Ppp I 4 A a xn o p r T T �C a a i 6 c A C i 'a Ca it 4 -- t HAVEN STREET 1 1 1 e Jj l I i I u I i i t; MKI /VZ}ETi7Ci5 A,.Wmt a . F • 8rµ 411111f FC- i"�.@" ZA �01'i�'11 ASH COMP bay RANCHO l:lJGAIAONGA• F -- r `TArr� TT l) i I I I I L— ■ L -1� LLLLL y i•� liIWINtl LiliY�110Yl0 L__ I ouap,„os�e -- t HAVEN STREET 1 1 1 I� ` MKI /VZ}ETi7Ci5 A,.Wmt a . F • 8rµ 411111f FC- i"�.@" ZA �01'i�'11 ASH COMP bay RANCHO l:lJGAIAONGA• *' 4Mm �1=t 4311 p,pAp ■ y -- t HAVEN STREET 1 1 1 MKI /VZ}ETi7Ci5 A,.Wmt a . F • 8rµ 411111f FC- i"�.@" ZA �01'i�'11 ASH COMP bay RANCHO l:lJGAIAONGA• *' 4Mm �1=t 4311 p,pAp y Smith, Fauss & Assadales, lac/ Consultants in Acoustics and PrewntationTechnclogy MEMORANDUM TO: Jerry Greubal, Greubel Company FROM: Joseph Meyer, SFAI / 15,0Y, DATE: February 24, 1989 PROJECT: Chaffey Plaza Car Wash SFAI Project No. 890204 SUBJECT: Noise Measurement Survey of vacuums and High Prnssure, Washing Equipment . Noise level measurements were taken at a car wa3h at the intersection of Valencia and Turner in Fullerton, California. The measurements were taken during the afternoon of Friday, February 17, 1989. A Larson & Davos 800B Precision Sound Level Meter was used and the specifications on this unit are shown in attached Appendix A. The 800E was field calibrated before beginning measurements. 1.0 Ydcuum NoisQ Level M asnrnment Drn `4_dp The vacuums used at this car wash are a now models of the Dilling- Harris Max -Vac vacuums and are the same type proposed for the Chaffey Plaza Gar Wash in Rancho Cucamonga. Noise level spectrum measurements were taken at three distances from the vacuum; 5, 10, and 20 feet. These measured reference levels were then distance corrected to obtain the zeaultant noise levels at the nearest property line which is approximately 116 feet for the proposed project. In order to produce a near worst case noise level from the vacuums, I placed my hand over the open end of the suction nozzle and continually adjusted hand position to create an atypically large amount of noise. This action of applying and releasing of vacuum was done to simulate actual use of �r i— �� _ R Via' 5601 west3lau�n AvenuetSuae 201 /Cutver Ciry[CA 90230/( 213) 568. 8555 /CABLE: SMITHFAUSE l5AlTW%.910.4902668t AX (213)568.8560 Oenvw,.031757,551t Son Fwasco(415)421.1370 New Yeck(212)956.6503 Chaffey Plaza Car Wash February 24, 1989 Page 2 the vacuum and was continued for the four minute operating period of the vacuum. ..1 Unmitigated vacuum *..o se Level s at proR%=Y Line The following distance corrected, property line noise levels were obtained from the above measurement procedure. d Noise level @ 5 ft., corrected to 116 ft. 6�0�7 Noise level @ 10 ft., corrected to 116 ft. 69.7 Noise level @ 20 ft., corrected to 116 ft. G3.6 From this analysis it is seen that the unmitigated vacuum noise level will not exceed the 65 dBA daytime (7:00 am to 10:00 pm) limit at the property line but that it will exceed the lower 60 dBA nighttime (10:Q0 Pm to 7:00 am) li These limits have been net forth by the City of Rana .+ Cucamongo. SFAI wishes to point out that the above can generally be considered worse case noise levels produced by the va.�.'uum. While at the measurement site, other such vacuums were seen and heard to be in use. These "real world" use noise levels were significantly lower than that purposely produce. for the measurement survey. At a distance of approximately 30 feet from the vacuum, the noise level of the "real world" use was easily drowned out by the noise of passing vehicles. Also enclosed for your review is a copy of a test report letter from Dilling- Harris and Ginsan Inc. Although not specifically stated, it is believed . that this test measured only the noise of the vacuum motors operating and that air flow to the nozzle was free, unobstructed so that minimum noise was produced at the nozzle. This can be considered the quietest operating condition of the vacuum. The following vacuum noise levels are obtained when this data is distance corrected to the 116 foot property line distance. Noise level @ 5 ft., corrected to 116 ft. 42.7 Noise level @ 10 ft., corrected to 116 ft. 41.7 Noise level @ 20 ft., corrected to 116 ft. 44.7 These noise levels are far below the City required limits but again it is pointed out that this is the quietest ; operating condition of the vacuums and is included only as a -� point of information. G-16 Chaffay Plaza Car Wash February 24, 1989 Page 3 1.2 Final Mitiaated__vacuum Noise Lev aFAi has been informed by you and by Donley- Bennett 9rchitects, the Project Architect, that a six foot retaining wall currently exists at the propose site and that this wail will remain to :achieve mitigation of vacuum noise to satisfy City requirements. This retaining wall is on the car wash side of the property line as thus it does have noise mitigation effects on the property line noise level. SFAI has analyzed the noise attenuation effect of this wall using the rigid barrier attenuation formula from Beranek's "Noise and Vibration Control'° and modeling the vacuum as a joint noise source. In order to mgdel a realistic condition, SFAI has based our analysis on a noise receiver located 5 feet behind the retaining wall and at a height 5.5 feet above the ground (Average ear height of a man). This assumes hoth the vacuum and receiver are standing on equal levels. In actuality, the residential terrain slopes down from the wall, thus the '.ack yards of the residences are apprcximately 15 feet below the surface level of the car wash area. This height difference serves to further increase the r_olse attenuation effectiveness of the retaining wall. The location 5 feet behind the wall is more representative of actual noise impact on the adjoining residences than at the propert=y line location directly behind the wall. This is because the noise level will actually decrease as one moves closer to the wall due to increased acoustically shadowing, i.e. similar to light shadowing. Based on this analysis, SFAI has determined a predicted a worst case vacuum noise level of 56.4 dBA at 5 feet behind the retaining wall. This is below both the 60 dBA nighttime and 65 dBA daytime limits set by the City. 2.0 Him+?±- Pressure Spray washer The noise levee of the high pressure spray wash system was also measured by SFAI. Measurements were taken outside a car wash bay at 20 feet from the center of the bay. Sound level spectrum measurements were then taken for the 4 minute cycle of the spray wash. During the measurement period the spray gun trigger was fully depressed so tht maximum water ( flow and noise level was achieved. l� This 20 foot noise level was then distance corrected to a -lI Chaffey Plaza Car Wash Februar; 24, 1983 Page 4 correspo•_4 to the property line distance which is approxi ,rely 64 feed; for the proposed project layout. At; prom,rty line, a spray washer noise level of 59.8 dBA was obtained. This noise level meets both the 60 dBA nighttime and 65 dBA daytime limits set by the City, without taking into consideration the additional attenuation effects of the retaining wall. 3.0 rinal Conclusions :Rw Ba. ;d on our analysis both the vacuums and the spray wash system of the Chaffey plaza Car Wash will not exceed the City required noise level limits of 60 dBA nighttime and 65 dBA daytime at the property line. The above conclusion are based on the assumption that the Chaffey Plaza equipment will be operating under similar conditions such as power supply voltage, water pressure and surrounding surfaces as those at the measurement site. One element which could markedly increase noise levels and invalidate this analysis would be the installation of additional large vertical sound reflective surfaces near the noise sources. These surfaces could include concrete block or sheet metal walls constructed near the vacuurm- or wash bays. SFAI recommends that no such hard surfaces be installed near tna noise sources. The concrete block walls used to separate wash bays are not included in this statement as the measurement site also had such walls and their effect was duly measured during the survey. Cf, � - Chaffey Plaza Car Wash February 24, 1989 Page 5 APPENDIX A Specification and standards for Larson & Davis 800B Precision Sound Level Meter Inte� rnatir-_al Standards Met: 800 8 Analyzer: ANSI SL ndard Specifications for Sound -Level Meters S1.4- 1971, Type 1 (Precision) IEC Standard 651 -1979, Sound Level Meters, Type 1 Peak BS4197 -1967 DIN 45633 B1.1 and B1.2 i Filters: ANSI Standard Specifications for Octave, Half - Octave, and j Third- Octave Band Filter Sets S1.11 -1966. 1/3 Octave Cl,---s III. 1/1. Octave Class II. BS 2475 -1964 DIN 45652 IEC 225 -1966 Frequency Res* YSg: -. 30 Hz tos 20 kHz: ± 0.3 dpi 1 Hz t.s 30 kHz: - 3,0 #'B Freauencv Weighting Filters-,, A- weight C- weight Flat Detectors (True PNlS and Peak) Fast Slow Impulse Peak (rise time 2 microseconds) Integrate (3, 4, 5 dB) Mirrobhoner 1/21= zaridom- incidence condenser microphone Dynamic ranges typically 24 -160 dBA Caxibratior The 800E is field calibration checked with a iarsov 4 Davis C4250 Precision Calibrator. Sound Pressure Level- 114.0 dB re 2x10"5 Pa Frequency: 250 Hz ± 0.5 Hn Accuracy:. + 0.2 dB at 260C.. 1013 mbar , ± 0.3 dB between 0 and 5000 L3 El `N, 1331 Phillips, Grand Flaplda, Michigan 49507 Telephone 616.241.1488 m. -higan To!) Free 500.9520051 National Toll Free M-446.72G7 October 24, 1988 P.0 Cox SS0609 Dallas, Texas 19355,0609 Tal,phone 214.341.761n Tesas Toll Free 800.442 4py, Nick Booker 17585 Sandy Terrace Riverside, OA. 92504 Dear slick: In response to your request about the sound level ratings on ahe Dilling- Harris quiet vacuum the following are the results of our testing. The test was tak ^_n at a 4 -bay self service car wash its Dallas, Texas, at 10 :00 a.m. Tuesday, November 10. 1987. Using a precision calibrated sound level meter, we estaihlixhed the background level to be 50 dBA. Tile sound level readings were as follows: Ft. From Vacmin, dBA i1 5' 70 - 10' 63. 20' 60 50' Could Not r'`-4z4* Vacuum If you have any questions please call. Yours try t' B ce Russell BR:rt copy: Cali West - Mel Goya f L2 V���� t v` QI btu iiv c• k. j OK(M)Q A o o C ter' cc;.r�EU�S/ 0 LIIC t 5 J bor I`lv0c/, l 7 re / ' � 1 �,�, ��, /� C G;i• � S r c�� r' - ��C-2t r''' Cr✓��! �tGir'I , i