Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989/06/28 - Agenda Packet ,,q en ax-- 0— G e N d CUCAM( 5 t ` • RANCID VXA14iQMA o PLANNING WMMISS a WEDNESDA'Y ' JUNk 28y.1989 700 P.M. 9161 BASE UNE 'ICTIO CIICAIW-OHCA,CALIFO$BI*.A,, i; L Pledge of Allegiance EL . RoU CCU Commissioner Dlekesley.. Commissioner Emerictt Commissioner Chitiea; Commissioner McNiel Commissioner Tolstoy Anszuo"metnts ; W6 approval of Minuteo Adjourned Meeting of May 31,1989 June 14,1989 V. Consent Calendar The following Consent Calendar itums al.-expected'to be rrut82e and non-controuersial. They will 4-o acted Un by the Conmisslon at one time without dls&zseon.. -Yf awone has concern over any item, it should be removed for dbelassiom A. DESIGN REVIEW i*OEt TRACT 13662-LEWIS HOMES The/iesign review of building elevationa and;detailed site plan fora�Lrtion of a previously approved Tentative Tract Map consisting of 26 j single family lots on 3A acres of land within the Terra vista P1aiined .Community in the Medium Density Xesidontfal District (8-14 dwelling units per acre),located qn the southeast earner of Hagen Avenue and Baseline Road-AFIi 1077-101-58. i B. DESIGN REVIMW FOR 'TRACT 13G64 - LEl`7I8 liOA�S -{,1'he design review of building elevations and detailed site.plan for a previo°asly approved Tentative.Tract Map conslsVtig of14 single family lots on 2.26 acres of lard within the Terra Vista Planned } 0"munity in the Medium. Dorcity Residential, Disteiet (8-14 ciwcri:ng unite per acre),located'ar''l,"e northeast comer of Hven a Avenue and Chu.-ch Street-APN: 1077-•h91y15. , 'F I. C. TIME EXTENiSION '.'-OR TENTATIVE"TRACT 13566 -,CARYN DEVELOPMENT - A ;%Gt forian eraei on of a Previously apo �ed T2naive Tact Map cvnsJ�sting of 1$"ingle family lots oh 67,8 aorea of land in the Low Density Resldent al Distrr.:t(2-4 c welLigunitz per acre)wi?h he Etiwanda Spoelfle Plan,located �t the southwest earner of mit and Almond Avenues-APN:. 226111,-02 '�11 10 D, TIME EXTE14SION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT"13*14 GMES-'The total development of a residential suadi,'tision oQ!5!7-, 04s orlon 11.1Js ae ) 3a4ated `in the Uw-Medium Reei,entiaa "strict (4=$ �lwofi1 rg units/ger acre) within the V6rz� Mists Planned �;ommunity, located,test the northwest corner of'terra Vista Parittq{ny and Mountain=View,Drive-APN; 227-151 13. E. VARIANCE 89-01 - LANG - A re4ueet to constrtiet a. trellis ! structure in the front yard, lvhieh eneroaehes slit feet into,,,the , front yawl'setilaek at 646a"Jasper•-Street APN: 1062-621-68„ VIL Public. R the fgllowing`items are;public hearings 1h which concerned individuals iltlay voice,their opinion of lj 'f related project, Please wait to'be recggnizsd by the cizairrnart'aiiid aclaress tfe Commission a gtntirg your name and address. All such opinions shall ba limited to a'minutes per individual for each project., F ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT . AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 39-02-- i3LACKMON HOMERS INC:. -PINC. -A request,to pre-zone,�app fftiT,%tely 25•acres of vacant land located, at the northeast carnet+ of hlandr and Rochester Avenues to a F density of Low Residential(2-4 dwelling units per acre)-APN: 225-1:52-01,02,03,04,1&'18. (Continued from June 14,1989.) G. ENVIRONMENTAL iI ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT;8Pr03' BLA-_� PC I;t1D3 HOMES It C. -A request to approve a DevelopV,Ient 4greenttntfoor'appro;dmately 25 acres, consisting of 70 lots at approximately 3.2 dwelling units;per acre, located on 'the northeast corner of Highland and Rochester A�4hues - AE,N,S 225-Y52-01, 02, 03, 040 be 18. (Continued from June 14,1089.) ' ?I. `'ENVIRONMENTAL, ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE. TRACT 13351 LE19IS ROMES >- A residential subdivision and. design review of 118`condomiriums on S lots and 8 singL family lots on,' 9.07 acres of land in the Medium Density Residential District(9 14 dw'ellink units per acre) within the Term Vista Planned Community, located at the southwest'corner o$#%Terse. Vista Parkway,and Milliken Avenue -APN: 1077-691-34: (Continued from 3une 14,1989.) x CJ L 'OPPO'R'Y/(JNITY FOR __ PUBLJG COMMENT ON THE ENIVIREYIdMENTAL ASSESSM-1NT FOR DESIGN REVIEW 88-17 - �) UPIIVE S 1tOPEPTIEl3 -'An'environment al analysis of thQ - propa;red deveit�ment o 38 apartment units on 3.15 acres of land in th/4 Medium Residentlal District(8-14 dwelling units,per acre) � loeated on the the north side of Ar,')w Jrlighway opposite Ramona Avenue-APN: 208,411-03,04,2-1h�&7;4. Associated with this is Tree Removal Permit 8948. /,Coiafiftuf;d from June 14,1989.) 1. ENVIRONMENTALLY ASSESSMENT AN1Y' CONDT:tONAL Ugh ECRMIT 89-12 - VICTORY BAPTIST CHURCH - A request to estWdsh a church in two ezristli j b uildings U 1v 7 1ing 5,116 square :'-t on 1:08 acres of laird in the tow Res entiai District(2-4 dwelling units Per acre),located at the hortb'rest earner of Bowen Street and Raker Avenue-AP14 201-5?2=31.& K. MODIFICATION TO TENTATIVE PA•i EL MAP 1.1934 L, A. CHAN"Ct' -A reddest to charge Tezitative,Parcel Map 11934 to J Tentative-Parcel Map 12573, a sub,ivision of 2.72 acres into 2,. !I parcels, 'located on the east side of Archigald Avenue, approximately,150 feet south of Damon Avenue-APN: 201�-252- i 03. L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDMO14AL USE 1 PERMIT 88-41 - RYDER TRUCK RJUNTAL INC. - 'The development of a tr& rental,leasing,a6l Vaintertanee facility with retail sales of moving supplies, Cori �qng, of 4 buildinngs totaling 23,296 square feet on 8.2 acres & And in the. General Industrial'astrirt(Subarea 14), ocated at the northwest corner of 4th Street rnd Santa Anita-APN 229-�331-06& 07. va Old Business Vim New Budnes M." mODIF1CATION TO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW'87-60-BARTOW- A;request to utilize corrugated steelox roof screening marry on a previously approved and constructed industrial building toialing 13,812 square gaet within an approved `industrial complex, comprising 11 buildings totaling 125,260 square feet on 8.43 acres of.lend in the Geneivl'Industrial District (Subarea S) of the Industrial Specific.Platt,located at 10723 Bell Court-APNt 209- 142-75. TX. Dinrsturla Uegvrts X. Commission Business N. ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT'S REQUEST TO ABANDON PROPOSED TCCME BETWEIfN THE ,CARYN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL XN9 THE GREENBELT PASEO ' O. DRSIGK REVIEW COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS r Xv I16I10 COMMQe tts Thu Is the Ome wid A e'for'/'1-ie general pUbtic to address the I� Coma Wi6n. Items to be disc',aed' here are those, which do rto; ` alreadya r on this d efada. 7 XIL AdjouER 11 The Pianni}iq`.'amiiiissia C'h4as OptOd Administrative Reguiattons that se.,*.an'If p.ht.adfoctmii en`F hme. If Items g¢b8YOnd that time, they shalt be Heard only v4th the consent of the Cra1r►rre;ssion. 1 w / , 1 „ r ,"' )Y i r, i i cr MAP .. ........ .r.J 1VrAWz tNAFrir C�160.T a shy r w , 4 T!INadNp tas'tas� m N m .a 1llINf PAR CIYT."AIL LL Wm LOX e CUCAYQMCA-CUASYt CA•K M IObA PAia � �,NI'4RlC'1q(iRkACtQ�fAL ASAtpRC' I RAJO y{-( VUCA ' -- --- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AOL DATE: June 28, 1"!89i TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission ;r FROM: Brad Butler, City Planner BY: Brett Horger, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: DESIC',N REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13662 LEWIS., HOMES The-The-d es gn review "u dung a evat ons addet�`eas he plan for a portion of a previously aPtgroved Tentative Tract Map consisting of 26 sinala family lots on 3.4 Acres of land within the Terra Vista Planned Community in the Medium Density Residential District (8-14 dwelling, units per acre), located on the southeast earner of Haven Avenue. and Base Line Road- APN: 1077-101=58. , , I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A� Action Re uuested, Approval of the conceptual plot plan, grading plan~ landscape plan, an-d building elevations for 26 singio. family hones. 3. Project Density.;; 7.65 dwelii.Rg`units per acre. C. Surround�i_na a.411se and Zdniti' North +--Shopp rttenLer, ej t7�ba nosed t;ommerciai South - Single.Family Homes; U_*;Medis:rt Density (4-8 dwelling units per acre) East - Single Family Homes; Low-Medium Density (4-8 dwelling units per acre) (Jest Single Family Homes,• Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre). D. General Plan De�stin,ations: ro,ect . ite, -Medium vengity Residential North - Low-Medium Density Residential j South Medium Density Residential' East • Medium Density Residential West - Low Density Residential'` E. Site Characteristics: The site is presently,vacant with no j sign f cant t vegetation. A 16 QO0 square foot green spate with 1 a Terra Vista gateway monunent sign exists at the northwest � corner of the site. The site slopes approximately 2-3 percent from north to south. 3�E2d A i i PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 13662 - LEES HOME'S June 28, 1939 Pagae 2' II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The Tentative Tract Map and Conceptual Site Plan for 57-stract was approved on November 11, 1988. At that time, specific design approval was granted for development of the condominium portion of the site and subdivision only of the single family iotst The applicant is now seeking design approval of tits zero jot line units. The single family homes will front onto a private gated-access street which connects to both Haven Avenue and Base Line 'load. B. Specifics Lewis Homes proposed 2 floor plan types. Plan l has two elevation schemes and Plan 2 has three elevation schemes. Both plant are two-story units; and have two-car garages,. Stucco return fencing will be provided between the homes. Front yard landscaping and special side yard landscaping will be provided to improve the streetscape. III. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE The Committee (Emerick.. Tolstoy, Krouti reviewe the proposed project on May 18, 1989 4nd recommended approval subject to the followi�,g conditions: 1. Landscaping should be provided not only within the front yard area (which is required) but also within the side yards to mitigate the zero lot line elevations of ,the adjacent 'home. Tree plantings in this area should be provided as well as 1 other planting. 2. Return roof elements and columns, pilasters, and/or similar building plane changes should''be-pr;,vided on the zero lot line elevations. A gable return was suggestefon the Plan 2 (left) elevation. « A return roof overhang was arse'Ygommiendad for the Plan 1 (left) elevation. 3. Rear and side elevation window trim should be provided of: all homes as depicted in the revised elevations presented by the applicant. t NOTE: These concerns have been addressed in revised plans which are attached as Exhibits "A-D". IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the Terra Vista lanned Community and the General Plan. The project will not be detrimental to, adjacent properties or cause significant X PLANNI COF��t''1SSI6M STAFF REPORT lT 3. -- Lewis HOMES wile 28, 1989 Page 3 environmental impacts. In addition; the prlrl'rbsed ,:(Ase is in compliance with the: applicable provisions of the T era Vista Community Plan,'the Omlopment Cone and City Stand&ds. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recomnensls that the P'linnito Co:rmission approve th�ign revieti for a portion of Tentatiiie Tract 13662-, subject to the conditions of approvul, through adoption of the attached Resolution. Res ally s fitted Br e City?Tanner BB•BHamlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" -Location Map Exhibit " " - Site Plan MAL Exhibit "C" q Landscape Plan 14WP Exhibit I'D" - Building Elevatioxrs Resolution of Approval with Conditions r i u rare. LYOR al I cii I or ITEM: DWTT 1 2 862„_,� j G in hx .t v :a ^„� �'+�'�*°� , }t'� '` i•, .mod v previously approve � porfion of treat '' . Id j tz It L S !S^ t NOR! (10CITY OF PLANNING DIVISION �sII° : 13 S ALE: A l O A 0. q : "SIT.bons '�,.1' I.Yst•.4iI w..rr.+�.a••r unanr f.. a ® .I.LM Mnl�� � [ •WNT O rww•ree. VM•IWY / � CITY OF TT 13662 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TrrLr,-* LANDSCAPE PLAN PLANNINd DIVISION EXHIFUT: C SCALE: nom �Fe assIS � a ; go as A �� . 15A sp ShD'$ d� r betas 1� - Sim �m 0 FRONT ELEVATION a SMAVA Yuraarsas� mm ruMw rws naautr caatnn*cs aeor IT ,� O�Ty OF -RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLES . 4.k o� PLAN 'IN DIVI I N A�7 EXHIBIT. A" ... .. �. r +��Ea 1�r,' � E r - 21 �i k-� c E s t r -z �. ..G b� ti. A^.� .. y ,�.�,. �. r � �_ i �i t, 1 1 � �` r � z 't� a�E s= yt �� �; ,• � t� k �a � ��� 'Ss� / �� E � .�., - �{w.. - � I 1 1 iA � C 3 ~6`!q �� �. Yh(�t IX� i. � �. A"z•..i a x. AA11 1 r �SEzx � i i� 1 c c �' :i^ t tl 'A; 11�9�.IA1.,.i� a K �tts�t 7=+ia .d� ;s. r,-...,._,1 4:� � -C, • �: x �. .. .. .. ,�` _ �: �r �� �� �� * � �. � � Aqw rt a�' •e � rt —�'��• :r'?�'x'..'.`"av'r'^'.."a Al BfAq E�Y�jTt6N e w D g9i � rP m a �B L� yp 4 -qf►;tt t} LEF,�IDE ELEVATION O s� ;A;x►d �is r a-s�°• i= DP • T .. .� iti t • ��. 3 a� s T►� ^ia4� tY tt .r�(� STUCCO i•OOO Y�fC4x7/1� CO-Mtt itiLl now RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION *,Ty OF ITISM-. 0 ][7,JM2 PLANNING DIVISION VIRIBIT:-IL CAL,E flan F O u, REAR EL VATIM - � Jt� ti r _ c ��-L.� o tog,,IP v .LEFT 8199E ELEVATICy tp ta MOOT SIDE ELEV&T_l CITY OF PLANNING DIVISION �j �� EXHIBIT SCALE:MOP, RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTIOIA OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, PLANNING C"ISSION APPROVING DEkGN REVIEW. FOR A PORTION OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO, 1360 CONSISTING OF 26 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 3. ACRES OF LAND gITHIN THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY IN THE MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND BASE LINE ROAD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 1077-10148. A. Rectsals. (i) Lewis Hpmes'ha!k filed an application for the Design Review of a portion of Tentative. Tract No-;; 1366Z­as�described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter, the subtect Design Review request is referred to as "the application". ," (ii) On June 28, 1989, the Planning .Commissic .qf the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application.,-` (iii) All 1�gai prerequ�Sites to'the adoption of cAis Resolution have occurred. 8. Resolution„ NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereeby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. Th€e 1ommission hereby specifically finds- that all of the 'Facts set forth in, the,.;- talc, art A, of this Resolution are true and correct. `, substantial evidence,preseroted to this Commission during the above-^et1:,., red meting on June 28s, 1989 including written ano oral staff reports, +":is Commission hereby specifically fins as follows: 1. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and 2. That the pi oposed design is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is lacdted; and 3. That the proposed design is in complizom, with each of the applicable provisions of the Terra Vista Community Plan and the Development Code, and 4. That the proposed design, together with the conditions "applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or, improvements in the vicinity. �f � PLANNING COWISSION RES64UTION li0, TT 13662 - LEWIS HOMES_ June 28, 19,84 Page 2 3. Cased upon Lhe ,indings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the appl!pation subject to each and every condit,act set fortB below and In, the attached Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated,herein y this reference. 1. 'scaping wi thi n the si dL yard areas of the homes-shall be i-dldscaped in accordance with the connept+aa3..pl an as p}apared by the applicant. Construct on landsca^- doccments gnowing final design of the landscaping stall be rMewed and approved by the Planning Oivi3ion prior to the Issuance of bdiIding permits. 2. Oecorative-si4e yeed return fencing zhall be provided between the homes. The final ,flans steal.l be review6d and approved by l the Planni rig li vi si on prior to issuance of building persel is, 3. All pertinent conditions' of approval in Resoli Lion No. 88-232 approving Tentative Tract flap 13662 Shall apply. f 4. All Singh,family residential developr.wnts with more than two models shall be required to landscape at least one model entirely with water savihs landscaping; and irrigation. Each "'water saving" model home shall contain exclusively low-water use plant materiels, low flow irrigation systems, and appropriate signs rind information for prospective home buyers in. accordance wits PT-tuning Division requirements. 6. -5pecial 'architectural treatment and enhanceivent shall be provided on the two e`Ievations which face Haven Avenue and Base Line Aosd to the satisfaction of the City Manner. C. Shrub; rows 'shall Abe planted, whenever poss>ble on Lots 1-20, on both sides of any retaining walls which extend along the pri,party line in front of the garages. 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to Oe adoption of this Resolution. r APPROVED AND ACOPTV) -THIS 28TH DAY OF JUNE, 1989. E PLANNING, COMM SIGN OF THE CITY 0= RAWCUA,CUCAMMA c , BY° _La_v1Fy7 Niel, C,hairnan ATTEST; Brad U er, Wretary { �tea. Pl AWNC COMMSSION RESOLUTION NO. IT 13662 ;- LEM HOHES June 28, 19$5 Page 3 I, Strad duller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the k t.*y of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby c reify that the foregoing .Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning, Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning �"o. ission held on the 2eth dak of June, Igrlg, by the following vote-to-wit; AYES. Cf1#%6i?WSIONERS: __. NOES. COMISSIONERS: ABSENT; CAKM1SS!gWER : r; J k _ , n IN " y ~ yw Riil! �v�a1n w4 .sR``{A•C•� 8: po 4�ri sri�3. NgO:VL aCY6 w O T = 6 YN..v" i a is ;Y oo"aek ■w gH•QiQi"•���M.yp 9�W C� A�==.Y9�i y p WAy�, s�Y 3L. CN f8 N: ei Q fLcyL V elf OI V M.�.A ■ L V N.�V 4 Z 21 k elf Gel ��Y AV.6.YN �:.wO yT NV'j�' t•C OE aY a�V �.� yoC�1 � will- Yp? V!yCL awO2L�1�(qj 4 Y 15 eo6 6wOL ptl OUN �+/.V G. IL Aye o N N Q.a ' 'ppN N 'pp •-U 9 '� r •t • -1 N Y : � S. anCW 'gs� a. Y.yw' , CQ 6IF Yr-ffiffiC A ell Lw$ y�M� tt�0-�'VTL �RI >�.CN�^iGCJIy$O M� N� . 0 OQ 4N C� �Lr... a O co �t° y V t a�i zi uM,�S�T.y CQ 44 _� NN V Y X C�• NAz p ap (� ♦�1�Y O+pf ro e 5�� � � �� Y4:+•- qR��� yy WWW ppp qq 4 ,y.�yC r i/i N yY q pPy.�N o a! bOX 44 b.' $Oa N' 7 L. h 9 iosP g'M4NSY+- N •�. 6`syg c��oroW" u $� �y rg� ,I Lo"•moo r$� diprw-5 ad u.4" o. v'aiw .q+ rN, °1w it's: M.. ,x�+-+ N « a8nol Oa N W- A 6 d A�11'•� wT Ss 4 CLQ si 6� VGNd y� �6► r,�+s , WCT.Y�� Mli U.89 �tl n» W � Q yCCO �to _O r L^U C CY 2,v. .. i O �V` q$ d Cie .'2XN� c IM&L�otla_ g^c9l�' �� �`oqg� V tCf saa. yq,- .- ...., L�pYV�qTLM� '.d�<4�N$ ' �Ys. q4" Cs to S �a�NtJ Ny� N�LN.G };H Ya .. CY..: O MUO P qq A N w.w' 3. pp y Y YYYYNNiiii C �O 6 Ol M w M�i y �Z'9L � o'YS 'u':H&'z_yis {?13 ^u Rwo H« gCYMi{cad tt�}�60 d'C p�,{n��MYs..�li Cu w (��oTi�LQCTy IC4 iMq ��111Cp ^ww a}s� qyI oC�..p3W Y. 6NVYfir. V9d QN16 y 2U00 M YLbNN WT• mT i CS lLwsi M6 ,r Ya�LR sc^Qa 7 _S= yN� A ►q}Y L TL QMj N�f Y N*iag .. Q � 2 , � t�,�, ay a'id � NIiA �i_" I l O g N TL R 9 L j�O L- d -- .`�.e+ jM. Y O Z` 4 r9 M g Mwl�w.� ^r.� t`'A sa- da'Y HyE n4. 4. Y Y a� .Si9 Has � � 2 p iF Y C [S `�q.& L�� w.i Oywg.{E1 E� ..® V�����'E Cria .LuN �p°ym3:y$ R•e sk6 .°.:h. r�.'Na <!-w'.O vdi Y.I <v Ze5®4 uIn AlSZO�N N•+Ni a IC6 W Si 61 .A -,Ni ti 1f L XI ! GONG C° �. ORY OtlOON�NWL',11 ,� Y.. C L{`Y g $�a`.t�'��,�ip, P"3�Y1.� Y qc v^,^q�Mc Y qµy, tY. W ��y/" •-y L yy P+V q�+{0�� 4" `y^L 0♦1°�A�m O�i01C C..4 _G C^m 1+ ■ F �Y.M.N �. co W •Wi i,a"S. $L� �� ,c w .w. �&� _ca °$ ai a°+ m� r^,.A 'e _ ri�� CCNU1 Wi �sru'.ly�. 0.. O ?`. L�� r7 qN a. ~q ':� �OOw.NQ '��. i{� .« 'OW n^Gg dC e+�.=L N�K ^ao a^� s� ..��y.e•��`.�r��d NQacua.e. �4a. cb v'9c me I ue _w$ OY Y'R���a� Wm� �n cry v�Y qn " a d b q'^ttWL "'I�${ °� NM^.1p .°jpWWVmmY°1 y�'§Eys�ivae.s^a'" �Me,�� �mp�' e�'2'� (��/•p iy�m. iOn� �I4 Q�+. pyy� �.KY�$�@'�'`��+ C`j' � qF yuVU�l lmi'w� •�_^ a.YL�M� w{I{f^GYGY� ��I'1L^U^rr'. 01" GMq G«KYN LgNL NI! l ~ 4 CN Y= •� N"'.yWy 4^ O^ C��"' yA�V G�1f Om9LI�Yyy'AN 4i n ��r� Z«m !�L�{Yp : { ty NO: lpq ''CC�''jj Qb NYi 6 YaV■ yp�.LWL L �.#4i. ■O �N� yY�N ��,1(tL�OLp^OC{ � f�1wNOM q.NYC 6 N 'ANO^Y�MA OCN Ct4l{ri,Nu�>.�14N�� QO,a�� � 'C OV Y.LL.�A GN M o:eTL s Yrt'a i o' C,.^ �. d �;+�" a w e� C Nafw 3 H ISE L m L t � it_4 VVV �yyg'� N^6F •� A > Lj����V � Pam + s L "3v "'' 'MJ � a,�TJ::� Y .ITS Y �� Y�xBa a .> ash �. . 1ma _a �.°. �� •N•. w� ��. ''=+cie�or�s' a Q. ooLw� �B esi.R n ai,� q� „JL■M. .�'� cY■ I �oo`O 4 `N ICY LN� + !I� ~:Yp`O� l'i� y{N{! Y�Nwm■ b'q� LF a� n� N Y L 3 � • q Y ^ct�� �Y. ,C.f.r & q C Q•� Y m�r R`y�R Vr � C6pwy Or� C{�. �N NNwYw M� ^II�� yyOACpS�Lp+QM ^V23: a�M fay 4w 7. �Nw LqN 9N �qR O :VQ • "(j�ai,y A� f) ^V eN t�_i y.Y r <5N® i:.�. yb �r vE2 uA ,.ta, vwoc� �'C+" 4h.,y¢T e�3 a %qN �-ON !.4 :C O. X°Nw.1 <O C <.5 '6It Gu�-s+%Qa .Q• A o lV A! 1 V0 gyp" V • N XI XI li IV.. 6 y t CCC Ny q�j LO ^ O AdML a+A 3 "yam,■cc,,�� Y c -J{ 5yZ i �M �.ca`yy7� EJ N> �.3 Gaut .rowLFi. _rde a y� � u� ..3NA 4KVyf �✓.. pq . W p �.GC YGGG.G b1 LG��BNj F Y N V Anp� ago z e CY 'Act g a�py�wY Mxj WOyV q�V OC Lyy ~DOYY.. �F. �Qo' AeoA 'bT Lw "o �'p�w� S�eyE,'ar v nrS O O Avaa -oM s��� ^._3 .DS g dA.. CL CYWw. vviil ^Cp ^NII 6YY4�= U ^K F Aty aroro!�T^p N TS t71 �G V Y&yL OT! « YiY � M4OOy QNV�lO Y y-8 A Yy�i1. '. q V `T4 Tr Cr Ld7ay ACNA YCG ��.U.r+ LCap ISY Y�Q �Ay V' xa L W �Yf tl �i C L O^buy 6l ai A p Mp '�yµ �cgi.2G'� H==A> M 4 L4 yQ�:]�B L^y 6A 6Y1 L Q � F,: :� f�•W VI F $ $ gu3 ti f C A AVM L .Or .Y.Tz MISS .i C}:s .� Ay i.M. „C",n'ro',.`V. . •(4y g pa 6'es er'SKn`iPb .i i.E'er q�QQC� yp C6. {a[ N �6.NTNb. 3�Y1�' w'gs WE b ^ N uJy�L-p a`` 34 +TL ^ C MLWN ul.� o SO I VM.�® E a rse N % _R .LyriuAY i :yqa t� :Z:w�rj.,,,,N 1i,�• ��{ro. � 'y"'W6a i�pffi NM.a Nwa env MO prY =vy°a'� 'tll6Ac5 w U�N ^A' 8a+ g' eM� tit oL VM ;ate a v $rp y q� CZ OS y�A�NLGC0 NNj. NA ,p1.A 71.. NppUM b..0 Y.;�.L6 . ONES R5 ®L.0 „=a.-vQUW N _ 3 ` 4`vi, :.° i6•,: ��rw es^�. o ., wYYY u p■L e� L.C15 .G �y �I o 1'�J I � ��� q.0 L•O�� N,Y Ly � � ��, � Yvq� i 4(y may g^ oy .tl•�� _ N WN ONY.OWT i^� Li 4 O OS�'Cy T wa+Elfs � � ro=Ew cyo �Ri. '� +.d 4.�yyMuqair �,Ve ga 6Y Sw pn•7 L C LL n.. YygvN:O �W uRY �oEg4f�p o"! H YN 4Y •- ./` a. Err p sY.} ^ 's�"�.. '�' a. a dN ji tl Fear Yf 1*ygtvrp,..pe�c y�B M gQ�li NC lygt{i O ` 'i9 F Cbf6� '1.'R' CO. Va NW �Y �L C N ip p lil'n.C w V ! we 6�+ Y, :a..�.((�SS.. :gyS.r�'F .pR. BQ :a^7 3 r=. " Xv ~Y N Sy-2 9;�' coiY V 9yyi V N••.nJ}�V�V SLA. y 0� C / �M• a �Lp. � s`C •� SOL UC=p O.i u �. TOs i 'E LT „tV yi + e Y nC w.0 r5ni�i ds d "F �$'$ alkrt3�L'7: a: 0 Ai g,Ti. $ U.ai i u e, ,� 3 o 3 w n U�3 s Sal gM ' u Ira �D €=Yys Y�Y UN N �.m 00 SA L Nr. .�. .qh Y q. may®e CC Y ��.. � c ® a{ } AT Jaw FSit a Is Is ®Q� Y ® Yy O� O. M W-Si p 43. Wf C A4,9 c Of QY V YYLyy y O. ; J'Iy LaCK14-3 pyN. L►o.yp +Qy✓.ayw. � ♦n� _C w` w®Q Y Y 0 (�f p�. ■.9; o. ,nC erpp'yt. �q " $$'� y. Y-3 a i iiY: Mo `t�, 'a � G Mpp� O app■■li ^yF L� yY��q7 yi O R.99FY>'O 1w.l�.u 4 M{00 J OJ ge�ItyY LY SMYC � gl� iti YI A0 y6YN�u tA$i,, 1� N.YCY y{. ��L{iN CGYyM� R�YY •&+.. Y� QyG,�• �C -V V P iA.a Sw�YY*6 X 4t. N q 3 3 i w N N Y L C:�OY "'DN Y sAft w a, W uu. "n vS�is It < i=w r q. M y CC q INN N C' O Awk M C p. F.M 4 C �N C Z:4y -at. .0 . N y. 1AY.s 9 q p ► i Y Fi y.. CC tl O 4L ♦V q. s e. Vz tai e�.0 Ea a:= Y � =- YidOl °aK�ti vCqJye .n` �p J •OpJ+ w{ an u ed K ~NcuW oG �dN,C Y LV�. f.0•`F i�• Yait I, GA�+ 4 < 1�'Y 1.•. CQ Y ;«� p!. j x`. gayy. N$ .'i£`'!_ Y•'v; �V w13. y.N qY. c ■Vy' Sv .L L� N sal. L' y pC�O L CY'pL •Lw YL p goSO N �r� .y aCCs YC I�C' BLper • T� .4L7 AH�_3q1 L�O 4 Y3, Np /+✓,O Ny7, 1x¢Al L. � L o`g O Nsy�v VOy��, •� �OMY.ti 'O lax ill 12 N �,MI.LU i� tt .,e y 1!�.�. YW K®M ti C1 Oi .may A w .Pq .�.� .fir N M 4 ! E IT M.O YL. YY0O .� w` -2 L s .{ice � M �1. 4'e .•.^a,Li «.r...'`�.'y y;� s���Oggq 7,i C x�{ N.Ey M$! i Y®aNM app OY•� C�^ y „� 1`'1 yee1t pyy{@{ aye S cA C T yp M �� 6 5`ti N g 4 . �6Lj flis �yN O Lgo C° N N �.< w s via >A� N oP s ; ° g.3yL �' � o ��ta �p� °e dYy � � Nd epgffi �ya O yy y■{� � ��Y gf ` W �aGN±}q LP� YV.*+p•IR tt4�y��� 047C N�a :utlN. Qq' ,g Vr^ LIM ae;ff4.1e.000 -CL5 J co p Fi 1+ y.2WO C d" d 14 r is al ec oQ C♦,,qpp j� gu{ 4 .g 1; g, ' um M 1. pa"Y« T{ 'A al 3 Me jig 4 W ♦ M J. X Kw y "xw {��M jj�i.L � 3 is, q At It R AO v y 7 {GYYGM...•M N Y�yy�� tlV C.. uu fV• s 4 J� 8 i1 6 Y I�iIA -..I. I G YY S 'C1 L t r 4+v Y id Qqpp y y, mod! Y iSMl� ][!4za •Yi tq A � � [[( n � N PfI Y 1G7 -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGlL STAFF REPORT DATE:. June 28, 1989 'f0: Chairrom and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City PTanner EY: Brett Horner, assistant Planner SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIYEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13664 - LEWIS HOMES e-design rev ew o u ncg a eva ons an e rd.T%e plan `'for a previously approved Tentative Trcct Map consisting of 24 single famfly lots on :2.26 acres of-land' within the Terra Vista Planned Community in the Mediva Density Residential District 1844 dwelling units per acre}, located on the northeast corns: of Haven Avonue and Church Iztreet - APR 1077-031-15.. I. PROJECT ARO SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of the conceptual plot plan, grading pan, andscape plan, and building elevations'. for 24 single family homes. ; 7 B. Project Density. 10, `dwelling units per net acre. C. Surrounding Land U;te and Zoning: rtt - Si ngte Familyy"moms; Copt-Medium Density Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre}. South - Beer Creek-,Flood Control Channel. East Deer Crr,i Flood Control Channel and singlo fsmily homes;ttow-Medium Density Residential (4-8 dwelling uny-.� per acre) and Medium Density Residential (8-14 dwel7tng units per acre). West Single Family Homes; low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units pe:_%acre).. D. General Man De<<gnations: ro ect=53'te - Medi um Densi fy'Resi dential North - Medium Density Residential. South Flood Control/Utility Corridor, East Flood Control/Utility Corridor and Medium Density Residential. West - Low Density Residential PLANNINGCOMMISSION STAFF-REPORr _ TT 13664 - LE141S HOMES June 28, 1989 Page E. SiU Characteristics. The site !.s presently -vacant with";no significant vegetation. The site slopes approximately 2-3 percent from north tr. south. Il� ANALYSIS: A. General: The Tentative 'tract Map and conceptual site plan for h s tracct was approved on April 26, 1989. At that time, specific; design approval was granted for development of the condominium portion of the sate and subdivision only of the single family lots.. The applicant is now seeking design approval of the zero lot line .units, The homes will front auto a new public street which has two cut-de-sacs at either ends and which connects to 1lorthgate Place, an existing stub street to the north. B. 5pecific: Lewis Homes'Jlkposed 2rf'totr platy types. Plan 1 has two elevation schemes and Plan 2: three elevation schemes. Both plans are two-story uniis`ard have two-Gar garages. ;Stucco, return fencing will bd provided between the homes. Fr"ont yard and spacial side yard landscaping will be provided in order to improve tha rAreltscape. III. DESIGN REVIEW COWITTEF_: The Comittee (Emerick> Tolstoy, Krouti rev ewe this proposed project on May 18, 19E9 and ecommendedwapproval subject to the following conditions. 1. Landscaping should be provided not only within the front yard area (Which is required) true also wititin the side yard$ to mitigate the zero lot line elevations of the adjacent home., Tree plantings in this area should bL-provided as well as- other planting: t 2. Return roof elements and colmlins, pilasters, and/or similar building plane changes should be provided on the zero lot line elevations. A gable return was suggested on the Plan 2 (left) elevation. A return roof overhang was also recommended for the Plan 1 (left) elevation. 3. Special architectural treatment and enhandements should be made on the two homes which face Haven Avenue. It was recommended that these horses be revised so that the zero lot line elevatioTM�s did not face Haven Avenue. {r`J_ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 13664 - LEWIS HOMES June 28, 19R9 Page 3 " 4. Rear and side elevations tdindow trim should be ptr',.._ .za or, all homes as depicted in the revised elevations presented by the applicant. NOTE: These concerns have been addressed in revisod plant ,ihicb are attached as Exhibits "A-O". IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS:. The project is consistent with the Terra sta Planned Community and the G"ral Plan. The project wt11 not be detrimental to adjacent pr6oerties or cause signif#cent environmental impacts, In addition„ the proposed use Is in_ compliance with the applicable provizirms of the 'terra Community Plan, the Development Code. and. City Standards. V. RECOMMENBATION: .staff recmmends that the Planning Coamission approve the design review fora portiq! of Tentative "tract 1.3664, subject to the epnditions of appro aT, through adoption of the attached Resolution. Res fully fitted, Br IN City lanneN 9B:BH:mlg: Att-achnents: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" Site Plan Exhibit "C" t Landscapes Plan Exhibit 1100 - Building Elevations Resolution of Approval with Conditiu..4 Original !Poor Quality � �wr u r�o.r -1 .,emu a�r$"•� r {i f pq r • 4 RANCHO,, CUCAMONGA 11 PLANNING DIVISION 6-Y EXHIB m � exisfing homes in x Zli r p r � k 333 1 p pit AML t 84%7: pirkust moved porlm �� •, W 4F� A 1.d ^ �.,'�'. N OATI ITZ11: OR TT 136&4 AITY OF RANCHO U TITLE: FLAN, �.� .. PLANNING DIVISION ZxH IT,-.. ..SCALE-. none .HYN��Y'pao�61001' .. : n11o+�nCL YYYNI ' narJi i4'.Y9R�OM YAM�'.1®�wetM.M l�fn YYIY1. 0. O MY.nYi,iYeYrY �t 1rYC,nrsAui.wun�eOY NOY .. . RANCHOO F::LAM PE P. �.. � � _ ;`�. ,, :i v �,y sue; t ..w.� *4 �— y�r M w� ':�;: �� <( `; �' .,. •_��1 vim.k.r:=<.. �r�l � � 1.Y,M'� I _ .. r�a� �v W k �ll�l{� � I��I���II 1h x ►�. aer..� x `� � � .. ' �� � '� s '� �:. t c se s ..� i [ FAG d' •.�.: { �� '��11 111ff111ff f1f t= a � xs•:.t A I j rl 7 t ��li. � Y • i 1 J + ,w z.:Mz^ 1 7 Y• •4 C �p n i��T gn 7 g¢AR ELEVATION P n LEFT am ELEYATI(m 0 a'•a � mom;s�. s s7 `EAT4100A MATINIA-I 900/I /00Y •� - //CMIIoi ST C0*02T/T0/11oNT R_t�iH7 810E ELEVATI,�P TY OF ITEM: ®8 zT IMM RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE ELLXATLO PLANNING DIVISION lg-� (EXHIBIT: - SCALE,: BOB R�a +! ab Mom g" 6* g s' t 40 �I 3 d O••y 9 fto 0 o �DO�Il}Ctl/illp NOW•#DE ILENfi4tON s0saani ru ros Auk CIS' I �: OR T . RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: EMM - PLAY � PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: 12-9 SCALE: aow y .1 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COt+6`RISSION GF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR A PORTION OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13664, CONSISTING OF 2.4 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 2,26 ACRES OF LAND 'WITHIN THE TERRA VISTA ;:-LWINED COMMUNITY IN THE MEDIUK DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE NOR'fHEASt CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND CHURCH AVENUE, AND BAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN. 1077-091-15. A. Recitals. (1) Levis Homes has filed an application for the Design Review of a portion of Tentative Tract Map No. 13664, ap described in-the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in 'This Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "'she application". (ii) On June 28, 1989, th6-!Planning Commission of the, City of Rancho Cucamonga helda meeting to consider the application.' (iii) All legal prerequisites: to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. 8.. Resolution- NOW, THEREFORE, it Is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows. 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rec!,Ws, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on June 28, 1983 including written and oral staff reports; this C=, isFion hereby specifically finds As follows,: 1. 'That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan,-and 2. That the proposed design is in accord nth the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in Which the site is located*, and 3. That the proposed ;design is in compliance'with each of the i applicable provisions of the Terra Vista Community Plan and the @evelopment Code; and. 4. That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable. thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, slifety, or welfare, or materially injurious'- to properties or improvements in the vicinity. F : t PLANNING COKIIS.%, RESOLUTION NO, TT 13664 - LEWI,'i,\MMEs June 28, 1989 Page 2 3. - Based upon the findings and con''clusiot►s set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Conniss'iort hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and, 'in the attached, Standard Conditions attached heret,,� and. incorporated herein by this reference, 1. Landscaping within the side yard. areas of the 'homes shall be landscaped in accordance with the conceptual plan as prepared by the applicant. Construction-landscape uocuments showing final design of the landscaping shall be reviewed And approved by the Planning Division prior to tb�,is'suance of building pormits. 2. Decorative "side yard rettarrz,eking sha!!�,,be provided ,between the homes. The final _plans shall be reviewed and approved by ; the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. 3. All pertinent conditions of approval in Resolution No. 8947 approving Tentative Tract Mao 13664 shall 'apply. 4.. The sidewalk ors "A" Street shall be ^�tinuous around the westerly cul-de-sac bulb which shall also necessitate locating the wrought iron, fence and emergenyy crash gate behind the sfdewalk, V. Alli,,,single family residential" developments with more than two_ models shall be required to landscape at least one mall entirely with water saving landscaping and .irrigation. Ei "water salving" model home shall contain exclusively low water use plant ,materials, ;-loan flog irrigations L.1 systems, and appropriate signs,.and intbrmation for prospective home buyers in accordance with Planning Division requirements. , 6, Special architectural treatment and enhancements should be made on the two elevations which face.. Haven Avenue to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 4. The Deputy Secretary of this Comission shall certify to the adoption of this Hesalutian., APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JUNE, 1989, PLANNING COMKSSION OF THE., CITY OF RANCHO' CUCA'MGQA BY; I rty e Chal rman h, PLANNING COMSSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 13664 - LEWIS HOMES June 28, 1989 Page 3 ATTEST: ra uller, Seeretary I,- Brad Buller, Secretary of in P?anning Comrsissii.on of tWCity of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing-Resolution r►as' duly and regularly introlec&., passed, and adopted by the Planning Cowrission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular,-meeting of the Plann*n Commisslpn held on the 28th day of aline, 1989, by the "O lloWing vote,4o-H'it.,' s, AYES: COMSSIONSS: . NOES: COMMISSIgNESJ; ABSENT: COMI$SICNERS: J 1 I 1 r , 1 1+B13 -..� 4N w 3Q ^a `�Z —da wait —.V V ��4nVy�Cp4V�.^ Y1lY5N`L LwM b��sN w. � C�{iYi� �¢w MYit4 p�LOlY pM�y.I Y N CC�`y GC C3 yy F a Ys " ass -I =x sigb c v a SO gs� c a5� � 2 u7M4' r Mir 4 cc ar1y�ppy. Piz ASS a tl N I. � .i V N t 8 3 •q Y to Id Pas -sN �, #K 7 �0 0 ca tn �4 Yi M M � M Q. p aiJ J v3 t w .." r3 �i 4 M 6'W w g » 2» 1 m R, c.gf6. � g^O msMuy s woLM�' ^` i ' r, oe S OY C a�O 'C �T V Y�N N M a 6ji a y g5i 3 Q}�'�p4t. -o b .e11t LCi to-V.. YVw_C ! �tlN Y. yil= ���q1c ^fw &'Sit i� # :Id ay i`o, v.�`.' .y Y` 5 -".ei l�a,v, y■? ` 7. CCON yOu�dSM YJ � u�w�My. 1�.0 fOryOw Yf� l ..�i! i�''i� (N�� V�.�N CyL�@VQ±yjMOy �f1 iySS. �.YVg1�tY jai yyy` yo�`I{N¢ lly ''•�C L. `OS� 23Qa $� N rr a6 �GgY Vq YYi�. V Yo1Y ^SQ yy�� p +r i faCi Y Jf 4 `yid y �q �YQ Nam. Uff 7<O`. gCbe �4ff�y^y{»{gyp. F�CNyy tN� QgiC IF Yq O^l. fl • VVJL Y�r^a. M� 1. N 9,5—. a a ,F Ils�L. � ^'n $ a-*' * J a r t o fy� Z aq4 V' Vu p.!^w Y.t •^Y4 M!M Mn^' ifaaaN�...Q (. @>�b' ul Y'SA w gCtlYY MVI YuI{yW S. Syr+�OOS1,+wMa lf..�■^ry.fi.{�V!`+ `4U ..Lg �s{ L L^ «.NM�1.�Y� MIwNNNr A' ® �C� ✓� ��. N Y � ZI F #'NI 4zu .C— is A f. Y M�r63gft ,3 P i•` 1711 a WC c@ y e c �y tlTi r � Y� . � OlY �Ya Lf li Liz -US rS IK it -�«a zi I.; s o�gg $ - B :I - g3 #� o s r : is „gig _ ,.f. ! 13.1 3U. N m � Z-M�. �. a}! 4. y w �. n�4.C6. ow.��. cad DA 'Rp'i � $. � A�B i 21 b r'SYMb pV�y sQ y� .M '�' L p E ya' B gt9q� +a ; iiN j`:A�y 3 L »V kd trl pLLis A !b ��..9 6wwt �OVyG Lµl �! yTT.. AR1'fiq Vaud �l.O# O`H.-Oi O, mx 04 Is �ffQee 8 ^6 `11 �oscO p4.��Y1}N!�Y•aR ..Y.�.sY } �,!'L� q` O• N 4t�.6 _•* y'O �LiAr��114,Y V �• LYy4 s� � 4V Sj �p�...4Y^{A�.p�n..i C�Py'r}�, � •��.yYp�g 7:��Of •O1N � YJQ CO 4 yyV Y�j��eON4E�p �yqL T}Y4' VOy`^ Y SN V Bpi qO N^O6V ^O"ln..pVu .3. VCpy� pL�� � � L" C�. ����NqO^O�MU VY �jV!'••NNA� .Vfi OY'NY.Y V •N �. C Ly •E. L Yy, �e,Y��y,`„ ,�G I�jV^r. • G ^+} ac MLq.p � •_O Y �',y ��7ys �.'�O_�Vy,o..`��a CV�•� =.N VY�: LU P } w T Ny 4p Y {.. js! op 'Eom a_ lip t �^Mg'�s asp yY 3 0 R G>> `J" >N Y tyy gL�ow��t?�v�` i`i;� g �q•�•'3 a 'yy�j M1{, VL':R1 L �. y V^m -K wii q,�, qM M^ '�Y+L. •v �' a,;.g{ N 1-1 t u" �L'p 4 0,. O^p O^ JV�ye J�•ro y V�• N� Pig ��"��� •6+AJ • N Ly�L' rM` L�YN i^Ng i ®r w.II,N«.N aa.+ <N aTtc hNi� <evu.•�.•� 1'+7. : 3 <.0 < $ �L+s . m Ff _ M N JI � �ai ��. C 4 •w" p N ICe{�Q1 iit Y 1�( �t•'9.{j� .~� y uu QQ • V i " L 1. i nIla- L. rh y ♦Q c q u o O Y pe�� �Q � r�� � 2.8 y� Y, qs Q�NL6 �� OY �Y ig yip1yYY �� ��Y":M .lg •TM~Q p� 9 V�r`b� NS � u�.'iQ•QOi w.�' � "j^��. py��p^a6 �� Q Y wtl.. ew .,w $Y.� ' • t'� «a� ' v w'gy+ 11t: �vuEir L Z v 1 L y Y G O. � b. Y ` rl cA_Y{$C� • W Li✓ r+r O p '� CV�p �C� �la►��. �.fYY.. � ��y.Yy 'RY♦aQpY� Y}WY��� aYy.Y: •Y t�t'� O6.VtY w.�■W t �tl1o�,� ' pM. �i Y L 4y Pp+Vw O.-� ^�,-. 2 R Y O^ E:.4.� y Y}yr. SV•N `C�4{ e v. Myy :ai.T a� "CNI tNN 'MNy N06; Gipy� y �• j `+ G Y Vy+ N j yy Y Y YY a I�VN Jp0 pVCI� C �. Y •.` � a�+�.wN w F w 31 a c �p�,�`•i Lw; LI „fw C fi '�...�.* y e w, V. �$ ;rayL' MN,y S g .a. 3.S� 5pp �«ya>#` S Yin CL J Sa 1 u - 1 �::.Y s 'A XI w s` 59 w yM. �3 N -. t� C ~W Y6w .QY YLii y� NC ! 0000 wbl (� wEb V_ 6 p`q « �•Yyotla Ya') ee' M5 � ' ' Y•�Y �C +R�. AM ` MY`g 4 • y 3Y y • I M-t rr" 'OY4nvi N 25 IL Im r y CC Yp Y` �111�M11 } s Y - ±• q Y _M �r gg _41 2 42 S iz-1 oNIs 1 -- ..� �. aQ.ea �' � �' o.'� �.y � A� O�� N � �ICC�3!! �Y ��O •N'�j'4. MY ii1 My+ l yyC' � � Y. ` �� • G w �S� Nfi4 'Ste• Ny. �d- a���CC ,a E�{ rr A^ 910 nn 3 ,by{:6 p p4, Y C♦QYp •.Ow$ ��M.VP `�r Y GYY N N V. ys��. t05..eMYI VPlow ��w• ► �� � �Y5 {�j�� ���.� r=..—ad y9 000 .■ ' 77.~n ,r�.B� <' ��....•' KR4B AVN.. � YI Y. W:�Y m.iY v .4�j{ i'�l f7 �a MW z--�,�z�°d {{ c w +a a d a J w spy C6 O f■a�iy PH ^! � ti�a� L 4p 3r l �A '�q�'•'���} ' 4�q, �$� :pt! dlb L M Qw �& 9 MVi. Mi 4!5 L L V"'y .L� Ni ' a At to Yyy R�'`C N � YNbW y{qR�aS 6i6 yltM��q ,awl w� + '° d8 € 75 11% X N �«gip _ _ ^Jul v _� o f `s 2, z �1d Is e� ei^!q`, w Y �psp �`s 1$N¢ w t �'� .i pgya�y � �° ,/^�s j � � Y � ct, �`R� V M Y4M S. AO pZU 9612 4 }9f O Or+f NY L `�� WM@ WYy. 4 -.wS C>S acg >4 eu 'tiPH }A N M r 24 .4 oi'O '♦d Y Rtiy M� '�r..� .Q OOLi4ASLM -N � M •� • ��u s1q ir. e`aCwr �r >�3§ o �`.. N e�.rytlq R : Y }} ♦���. s♦• gN�'�',sp I. �. V •�O Vq �CQY � a u3 90 � NU 'E Vy fY U��L ip� �� �� 3a Sing 3 �a t�s-`q2 gae0 T �y0. O1 Y C A M .i'y ML Otl �l �O � O W y( • b.M 'Ovate v a'r Y w c a �' e'!, L. CL 'c �w�c. 71� ��� �# a'e� .A.w3Y•+a: � ��. ",� P. �� � .Ld.,n� ZZ Nall .e¢r3ti.N amo. I ',+� Q aa6.`�Yww4ee L ```� L`q•Y '.tl i M xqxt�4 L MM 3�r..A+ " ` yo a ,ip two e"L rL:"Q� 14 CO. �g Yotl a $ $w � �•�� a�.�Mr. 4 99 yr 6i !3 1. M M As _r. �Iso b4`Y —a` L _ Y 6 V:6 a.` tl�� 'fie ♦ ��+ '^gib w «`♦M "'.Is S H a63 it as.. t� It Sld gg L NN ss Ai 9 �4Oq OP n.tw. y« �w� ate• .. O� wrl -� M�•41 � 4�4� p� �Y O., '� Ne ♦ �P. �MyGtl ?yy 4 C N N «0 y y L g ® Y Y♦ y V A �i R:Q L W S L W) ag V I W 3 �, »y uu•� I .ems'+ N� YC� rJ C MAY m� f V C�Gi oaf _M Rii pL. y�i�M b Q u tl Is At alAj l w'I OeLC`a+Q a {.y O ; q. M4Sr� �9(p�w ai► w is Q -41 Ni J.¢yE t KN 1�NMSkr CL�i16w �$ #Ny� .[t}M �w MN 7R►m. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ST"F REPORT DATE. June 28, 1989 All, TO: Chairman and W,embers of the Planning Commission FROM: Br?.d Buller, 01ty Planner BY: Steven Ross, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13565-: dARYN (FOSCOE WILLIAMS LINDGREN,& 5 . request or-an ex ns o�i n of a prey ous y approve Tentative l'ract 1�4ap cor:si,ting of 164 single family lots on 67.8 acres of land in the Low Density Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) within the Etiwand& Spe?.ific Plan, lotate'd at the southwest corner of Summit and Almond Avenues APN: 226-111-02. , I. BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract 13566 Was tentatively approved by the ann ng"Commission on July 22, 1987. On June 9, 1989, the applicant, Fuscoe, Williams, Lindgren & Short, .requested on, extension of the tentative map in order to allow them additional time to record the final map. The State Map Act, Section 66432.6 allows for up to 36 months of extension. 'Typically, eAensions are granted in 12 month increments. II. ANALYSIS: Staff has analyzed the proposed time extension and has compare the proposal with the 'current .development criteria outlined in the Development Code ar.i the Etiwanda Specffic Plan. Base! upon this review, -staff determined that the project meets the Basic Standards for the Low Density Residential District (2-4 Dwelling Units per Acre) III. FATS FDtZ FINDINGS: ?he Commission must make all of the following findings In order o approve this application; A. There have been no significant changes in the Land Use Element, Development Code, or character of the area within which the project is located, that would cause the approved pro$ect to become inconsistent or non-conforming, B. The granting of an extosion should not be detrimental to the public health, safety,'or welfare, or materiallyinjurious t4, properties or improvaients in the vicinity. 'IPLANgING Cq ISSION STAr REPORT FUSCOE, WILLIAMS 4TNQGNEH & SHORTs 71ME WENSICN FOKtjl` 13666 June 28, 1989 Page�? v IV. R€COMMDATIO1%- Staff recommends that the PIanning,;'Co*ission approve a one 11) year time extension for Tentative Tract 13566 through adoption of the attached Resolution. Resp ully itte oe G Br Per City annex BB*.SR:sp Attachments Exhibit "r°' - Leiter from Applicant Exhibit 41° - 14 +jnity Map Exhibit "C" -SA*z Plan Resolution tia. 87-126 ' Tim,(Extension Resolution of,Approval 1 r VELLUM UNDGREM t'kil Engineers•Land Sum-yor June 7, 1989 Mr. Bird 13l-'11er, Pi-mining D-Vt. r- ON City of Rargho axamon'?a P. U. BMC 807 1 Ranch Qmamcnga, California m720 AN 11001412tIA34016 Dear Brad: Subject: Fate-miai of TU atiM Tract 13566 This letter is to request a cne year extension of the corditic nal approval for the Tentative Tract 23ao 13566. The =nditicnal approval for the 'tract was giVen on July 22, 15,67 (Res. #87- 126). As the first City revimmid subdivision within the BtaWandaL Specific Plan, this map is pioneering many infrastructure issues. Dwign review ap- proval was issued by the City June 8,`1988. Since Our tentative map approval expires July 22, 1989, please expedite this �. rnAuest. Thank you very mach for your time and attention to this matter, if you have any aupsticrs or if I can be of further assistance, please call me. Sincerely, FUSME, WnWAtS, LIZ1DGti N Ts SHCEM, INC. Charlie Idu, P.E. Prcrj cc rm qzr sa Copy to: Mr. gay Allard, Ms CL1101 f 442.0201 f 910 kedbrll.iaaum-}tile 10Y)-,kurtd arra,0slilor fur W 05^A*me G:'t-,)2 50�19N/FLYI'lq l 250-"t?li CI ITEM: RANCHO C A GA TITLE: Lgrmt AmstieAyr w em'6/6i'F 1 J NORT'. CITY OF ITEMS 7,m glow TT ►3 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: Vielovirle &Z ?LANNINCT DIV.I ION —4 ExHi m SCALE. VERB � S AN gal lIr aura, JALicy Air= now • o rile e..®.�� TENTATI-M TRACT 13see TM Cl6�llym CH YRLtiBYINT s�U-s— 21 ?fir.= ....."T� �� /T�9C b+• :d�G NORTI . II I ONGA TITLE: .4doM Plzag PTUNNING DIVISION Q, - EXHIBIT:C®SCALE: RESOLUTION NO. 87-126 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDETIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13566 WHEREAS, Tentative Tractor Map No, 13566, hereinafter "Map submitted bl, Caryn Development, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Railrbo Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a residential subdivision of 67.8 acres of, land into 161 single family lots located at the southwest_ corner of Summit. Avenue and Almond Avenue (APR: 226-11.1-02),, regularly-came bsi,�ore the Planning Com. ission for public hearing and action on July 22, 1987; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in thn Engineering and Planning Division"s reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has -read and considered the. Engineering and Planning Division's reports and 40, onsidered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE,. the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Noes resolve as follows: SE+^ ION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to^i'enaive Tract No. 13566 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, aavelopment Code, and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Coda, and specific.plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development,proposed; (d) They design of the subdivision is not likeiy to cause substantial environmental daeatge. and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large,. now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. PLAUNING COMMISSIO` `s509UT10N NO. TT 13566 C_YN-DEreLOPMENT July 22, 190 Pace 2 ANIL (9) That this project will nit create adverse impacts on the environment and a .,Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 13566, a copy of which is attached eh� s hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: Planning Division: - 1.. Community Equestrian Trails shall be provided along tho north, south, and east tract boundaries. The precise aliarrient shall be shown on the final reap which shall be reviewed and approved by tha Trails Advisory Coamittee prior to recordation of the reap. 2. One Texas uabrella tree aad six (6) Olive trees are approved for removal along the)- east ;property line and shall bC replaced in Kind on a one-for-one basis with minimum 15 gallon size. 3. The Eucalyptus windroi along the north boundary shall be removed and kplaced with columnar type trees as required by the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 4. Average lot size within the trait shall be 15,000 -square feet The revived plans shall be revicm*0, and approved by t1e Cif Planner prior to recordation of the final map. Engineering jiyision 1. The existing overhead ut;lities (.telecocornicationsl on the project (south) side of24th Street (Upper Sum�it Avenue) ihall be undergrounded along the PrOde(no roo east) prior the first pole off site p public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. Reimbursement of one-half t.'e City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development oN the opposite side of the street is not feasible, because the property is in this County., 2.. Notice of intention to form and/or join the Lighting and Landscape Districts shill be filed with the City Council prior to recordation of the final map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. 3. The developer shall submit a request for the vacation of Aimona Avenue as shown on the tentative map prior to final map approval. C..7 PLANN14G COW-ISS10h ,,ESOCJTION No. TT 13566 - EARYk OEVELOP14W -- July 22, 1987 Page S 1 , 4. If the project is to be phased `?hs streets and drainage facilities to be constructed with each phassa shall be as approved, by the City Engineer. 5. All Interior'focal streets sWl be constructcd.wi`.h a 36 €fiat curb separating within a So foot eight- of-way. dewalks shalt be provided on at leash one side-., 6. Twenty-fourth Street (Upper SuWgt, Avenue) shall be improved full width to include curb and gutter on the north side- for thew entire length,:of the project, 7. Lower Loop load from the aast�,tract boundary to Cherry Avenue: a. Construct the roadway to include a minims 26 foot -wide pavement (2 lanes), full ;, fill embankments for the ultimate roadway width, and full length culvert capacity to pass a QZOO under the roadway. ' bb If the tract is to be developed in phases: (1) Bonding for the total cast per (a) above shall be provi(4d prior to recordation of the first final tract map. I (2) The construction.per (a) above..shall. be completed prior, to occupancy l releasm of any parcels in any"tracts containing parcels south of the Lower Lo Road and/or' the fiPSt two i_ east/west tiers of parcels north of the Lotter loop Boat. The developer shall make a good faith iffort to obtain an easement for tha roadway, howevar this requirtmeit shall be limited by Oe provisions a'F Section 66462.S of Me State Subdivision, flap Act. (3) Either the roadway per (a) above or similar improvement of 24th Street. from the east tract boun ary to CherryAvenue shall be= cozpjeted prior to the occupancy release of any parcels within the total trect. PLANNING COMISUOh a.c50LUT104 NO. IT 13566 - Cp,RYN DEVELOPMERr ct July 22, 1997 Page c. Funding assistance for the ro&, ::sir per (a) above steal T be ai• follows; (1) The ;tYsteos Development Fees and Drailh4;z- Acreage Pees from,, the protect may be credited toward the direct cost of construction of the pori;ion of tht roadway (Including ref#;tad regionril drainage faci'iiis} aortas tlu basin if so approve `by the 4ity Council. (2) A Orticn all the $500,000 off-site roa(*4y conttructi'on coatributf;,m par Cr ullty Tracts 1360 'and 13565 (lo+kated to the north of this tract) may,! be credited toward, the imArov Agin: costs if sb approved by the;City Council and County, (3) Thq developer may enter into a reimbursement agreemnt for the cost`` ® of ! improvements from future deailopmen as it occurs immediately ad-acent to the roadway; however, if crlidit against the $500,000 co�►tribution per Tracts 13664 and 13,C6,5 is granted for Was portions of a roadway, future rambursesents shiul I be, made ta- the contribution fuAd and`rot to the-devOl opts. d. The rc#;Way stall intersect theM Avenue ac fa I root an possible tw provide as wuGir distance a- possible from the freeway, 8. Tba site shall be protected from off-site flood flows as ifollow or as otherwise approved ,hy '&4e City EngirWer a. Wss`,Vact boundary: Provide a„structural block wall ,430ng the entire length, a minimum of 2. - feet x. dve and 3 feet below the adjacent natural ground to the welt. in addition, ihd, pads adjakjht to the -fall shall be elevated r2 feetr-, aboy ;the adjacent natural ground to the wes'c. G- fti1 � t` PLAP.W.43 C"ISSIa -;,-�,Spi L'ON rya. TT 1356Cs - CARYN DiViGMENT July.29, 1987 Pape 5 b. 'Worth tract 'boundary: Provide a levee on the north side of 24th Street from the qpz Sevaine spreading grounds near 24th Streot extending northwesterly a sufficient dista:tce to intercept flows from the north, west, and east and .trot divert flows to the property to Qe, west. ' The north fact of the levee shall be herd faced and shall have sufficient longitudinal gradt to be self cleanings c. East tract boundary; The pads shall be elevated above the 100,year fiord level within the basins to the east. The west bank of the norrth basin shall be reinforce4 to prevent erosion from flows entering the basin. 9. Storm drain fa pities shall bo provided as determined necessary by a final drainage report and I as approved by the City Engineer. The systes design shall provide Q100.,prv' sction. A master plan shall be provided for the-i.Wsite area to the west. All facilities necessary to serve the area to the west that may be located within this tract shall be co%structed to the tract bouhdary. 10. The k.iposed storm drain within the rear of Lots 2 3, and 6 shall be relocated to be within Streets J and K. U. A detailed alignment study shall be provic° .for the Loop Road from the west tract boundary to Ath Street prior to recordation of the first final reap. The study shall investigate both the Current Etiwanda Specific Plan "V O igiwnt and the proposed alignment curving to the north intersecting 24th Street �.2 Wardean Bullock Road. All necessary stint right-of-way r*Wired for the worst case aliment within this tract shall be dedicated on the final sap. 12. A detailed alignment study shall be provided for 24th Street extending a sufficient distance off-site iJ to verify that the roadway is placed in an optimum location in' terms of impact on adjacent properties, transitions to existing paomant, and crossing of the Sac! Sevaine Basin. +J o PLAMHIN6 "OW4ISSM :.40LUTION TT ,135A6- OAAM DEVEPPMW Jul r'2..1987 Page 6 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22NO DAY OF JULY, 19,97* " 11 PLANNING, COWISSION„OF IME CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ! y BY: - `�i�rr y a a rMarl ATTEST: 'Af-40"VrTrl�' r ecretare I. Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of V Plarniag Comoissioa of tk a City of Rancho Cucawnga, do hereby ,certify that the foregoing Resolritfon was duty and ,; regularly introduced, passed, and adopvcd by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Sucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Cowmission,held on :she 22rd day of July, 19 �, by the folloain4 vote"to-+dt: AYES: CQtiEiYSSIONERS; '� EMERIC►C, BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, MC:NIEL NOES: CowlSSIMUS:Ash NONE ABSENT: CowlSSIONPRS: T6 STOY 15, y i j _�� RESOLUTION NO. .r A RESOLUTION CALIFORNIAE PLANNING APPROV S A TIME EXTCF:SI CUCAMONG , M I CITY OF e 226-111�,'. AND FOR TEt3TATI1ttt 7,RACT, No. 13566 APNa WING FINDINGS', N Si3PPORT THEREOF k. Rey_ t;} Fuscoe, i.W 1 i ar�s Traet�No.� 3n3yd6 as c escr d Short have r n thepti tI a of far the extension of Teniatl�e this Reso"Lvt3,'+• ft�!" tit tMs Reso'�utian, the suhSect Time Extension '�catian�- req°lest is recerre3 to as '1tPi,e'aPp= t',il On Jut z }pis 1981, tabs specific e oc�r+Rd tiunsits and time tlim . 87-126 thereby apprcv �, subject TeritaL'+ve Tract ib. 13566. legal Prgrenui si ties to the adoP,ion of thi s Resol uti On have occurred. E. Resolution, r end resolved by tha tJ04l. TH'6R�ORE It is of'r�rya`h�Cucamo�rn�9llow5: Manning Gocnniss�lan of the City , 1. ihis Co�enis�ion hbreby 5!�cifically finds; t!�et all b° the Facts set forth in the Recital,,, Part,A, of: `chi Resolution are '�rua and cr:rract• A ti Me snted to this Carssai=sicn, gasdd upt n srtb4,. i al evi once . . $'ncrudt:ng +ritten and seal ;wff reports, this Cosiss$on krereYi� specifically finds as follows: is in ta3 �• previously appr'Pved Ter; tive vP subs'. ntiolcamPl�ifit Plans,l-th the CM an flan ,eeeral Pl . $p Code and &Lli cies; and ill not b� The ext0h, 0i ctative Ma onsi sterT Vines rri th t 4-cU went Gene ae significant n Plan, Specific 'Plans, Ordinances. PSans, Codes and Pol i cies, arid, $s "(,It -likely tc M She extension of the TentatiKe - and. a , cause p�hlic health or safety Prot" (d) The extistlawnan3 1�ca�ordi�Bence 1imiis prescribed; 1:r by state \ PLANNING COMISSION RCSOLUiIOk NO. FUSCOE, WILLIAMS LIl�REN SHCRT t TTMt7l"TENTTDN TT 13566 ' /j - Page t 3. Based,upon the findings. and conclusions, set fo4-?,,T pan gragl9s' I and 2 above, this,"CaMOssfon bereby grants`a Time Extension for: { Tract - r APp1-leant Expiration. '•'I3566 Fuscoe Wflliarcs,11ndgren 4,-%ort.. July 22, 194 \ 4, The Saci4tary to this CoMPIssion shall cert«.fy ti the"1.rdpti16n Of this Resolution. APPROVE(VAib AMPTED-MIS 28rH DAY OF JVNE, X-g$9., c PUNNIAG COMY1 SSION OP.THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOf r.A BY: -"—Garrry T. Memel, chairmff ATTEST: � a 0 C*P's r5g ry= n, 1 I, Brad E4ul ier-, Seci etary of the PldnninS 17 Commit-iwin of the,,City of Rancho Cucamonga, , do hereby, ct+rtify, that 4e� foregoing Resolution was"ou,jy wind regularly introduced, Passed, and adopted by the Pl�fi*rng 'Crmdissiars sf the ` ` City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeti4-,of th .fining Commissi6i Wild on the 2L'th .day,of J►ine, 1989, by the follwing :v{• 4 ' AYES: SSICAERS: WE'S: COWtSSIONW ABSENT: COM)ESSIONER3.: i i F �77 CITY OFF RANG AO CUCAMO.Nr3A ,_5 STAFF` RE-PORT s � DA',E: Juno! 28, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM. Brad 8u'Te,y_Cii> Planner,, BY: ,t Coleman, Senior Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION,;<DR TENTATIVE TRACT 1 304 - 'LEWIS HCMFS - Tne a a eve p.rxen �o _res e"�"d-nlria'T s,; �v s}one;ots nh 11.13 acre Toca,-: do the low-Medium Resl den t4al District (4-8 dwelling s per, acre) within the Terra Nfsta Planned Comnunity, ad tat the z northwes'; corner of Terra wista Parkway and Mo)n;ain View Drive - -APH- 2P7_IS1-13. I. SACKWUND: TEntaiv.�,e Tract id301 was approved by the Piano!,Ag or_ -,s=; on on Maay 27, '1987. The final map was sc:ieduled ¢or City t Council approval to record on t?dy 17, 1989, but was rFrxtov�d because of the i,-,;ue of a school distri4 "�t T1 serve" letter fftm_ Chaffey High SchooT.' nn May 19, 1989, 'thy,applicant t is'tiomes, requested an extension of the tentative map to alliw time. to resolve the school: issues The State Map Act, Section 664517.6, all(w-, for up to 36 months of extension« Typically, extensions a r tranted in twelve (12,) month,,'lncrements. IT. ANALYSIS: Staff has anal*zed the pr use "tuna extension and has cc.,r,pme the pi,oposal with the currern 43velorwdent criteria outlined in the, Terra Vista Cos>'munity Plan. SaW upon this review, staff deteernined t"at the prvject meets the s•9ndards for j the Law-Nedim Residential District (4.13 dwelling units per acre). 1 1!1. FACTS FOR FINDINS: The Cm, ission taunt make all of the following nai'ngs in or er to apprate, this apt ration: A. There have been no significant changes in the Land Use Element, naval opment Code, Terra Vista Cowuni ty Plan, or character 0 ft area within which the project is located, that wv)uld cause the approved project to beca�e inconsistent or non-conforming. ! . The granting of an extension should not be detrimental � to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially f injurious, to properties :or. florovements in the vicinity. C r pLANNIM COt S510k STAFF REPORT RE: TIME WIASION FOR IT 13304 - L£WL$ i 'June 28, 1984 i. Page 2 IV. R£C(3 tM£NDl'nOH: ..taff recrx nds that the P1a nnipg Cm n approve a one (1) year time extensfan fer Tentative Tract 13304 through adoption of the attached Rdsalation Re fully tted, City an or �( BB:DC:kv Attachments Exhibit "K''- Letter from Applicant Exhibit "B" _ Vicitifty Map Exhibit "C"' - Tract,-,Map Time Extension Resalution of Approval AML 4 It 'r Lewis ,"(4omes ManageMeimt Corp. 1156 Nonh Mountain Avenue!P.Q.Box 6704 Upland,California 91795 t 71419854971 FAX:714/981-9709 y May 19, 1989 City,of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ( { ,, Attn: Dan Coleman " Re: bract 13304 Map Approval Extension Gentlemen: I Our T-act :133C4 is bonded and was `scheduled for the City.Coulwil agenda of May 17, but because of Chaffey Higi: School Districtls refusal to issue a "will-serves" letter, ,It was continue,: toAftL a future meeting. As the map Was approved May 27, 1937, it ;All expiri� at the end W! next week unless extended:; please consider_ thin our request to axtend. that appEoval ufttil such time as the.; "wilt-serve01 letter problem can be resolvers and our final map;' recorded. <r Thank you very much for your cooperation, Sincerely, LEWIS H(OIWS rIh$ie'GWIENT CORP. Don N. Thompson DMT/sd t P 1 •J1 �F i L i , r /' t :w:riR++..�..,}—....., _ Y�3N YNY91�g� •w192Wbhri►iM NusY ; �.f�; 3 L t 43l _ J• L Pik i�. of ✓�� r. '� S �dC i>'a'o'Ws�#.^l� .�r•T .^,P Y�� "i,pa3.�• � � � �a ? g }2 y � .k�h A`�5:� mix.•ar«r,� i8'•a,t "' az t�M..Q�t� � .-t �.. ®w ����Lrr. t wrs-} .e•." $' �"v..r'" S .. e'er F � � �«e A �i11rMIYait�a+famnee•4' .� _�__.. _, .,.. i . {ItlF� �fc�ral�9rruav� . i �` . 11160"Wh nL Mpr .. A.+tet*Dr aahlalnu.Yun41 -�i1Bti�r.7171 sktavaa3r,.` a i��� A t�.wn wv �aew: au..aa. l+rr R ,r wa a 0 3' ,r_':e. a��do , `,.,,.,.'.__•.. �` "' Ah o tl ' 61r."s gill§fi r e H� j IBM Hill CY Z so (ot1 to t pp S a y-: TT j Ld a , ' ~� •E�� S � 1\��a.�T"C'�"�' '�.v,/^. •` /RR14fY 1:� --..`..`r ' " w. RESOLUTION NO. r. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY r- RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT` N0: 13304 - APN 227-151-13, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. (i) Lewis Homes has-filed an application for the extension of Tentative Tract W. 13304 as ddiiscribed in the title of this. Resolution. Hereinafter itt this,Resolution, the subject Tune extension request is rafereee, to as "the applicationo„ ()i) On Mav;27f -1987, This Commission adapted its 'Resol'dtion No 87 01 thereby appro•,tng, subj t ,to specific conditions and'time 1tn?ts, Tentative Tract No, 13304: if (III) All 1egal pr&equisities to"�je adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution, t NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the city of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically firms that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals;,Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon, substantial evidence presented to this Commission, including written and oral staff reports, this tcusission herebti, specifically finds as follows: (a) The previously approved_ Tentative ,@lap is in 3ubstantial'. compliance with the. t ,`.yls current General Plan, Specific :Plans, Ordinances, Rlt.rs, Codes andiPolicies and (b) The extension of the Tentative<Rv will not cauF sig0131cant inconsistencies wi.n the current General Plan, Specific Plaits; Ordinances, "Plans, Codes and Policies; and rc) The extension of the Tentativo Map is not likely tra cause public health or safety prokless; and, (d, Tha extension it within,the time Emits prescribed, by state lave and local ot-dinance, i ky i F PLANNiNC COMKSSION RsSOLMON NO. J RE: TIRE EXTENSIOR FOR Ti' 13$04- LEWIS June 28, 1989 Page 2 ANIL 1p „j 3. Based upsi the findings and conclusions vt forth In :paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Comm sion hereby grants a-Vine, Extension for: Tract Applicant Expita:n 13304 Lewis_ilome May 27, 1990 4, The Secretary to this Commission shall' ce'�tify to the adoption of this Resolution. t, 41 APPROVED AND ADOPTED TWJS 28TO DAY OF JUKE, 1989. PLANNING COMSSION OF THE CITY;9F RP-4C 0 CUCAMOWGA BY; Carry T. FERiet, airman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Comaiss,.-, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify, twat the foregoing Resolution Was duly, and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the Cites of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular;feting of the Planning Cowiissiou held on the 28th day of June, 1989, by tho following'./,tote:to-►its AYES: COMASSIONERS: NOES: comrS$YONERS: Iy ASSENT: COMMONERS-, E f 1 'r I \ t� a� CITY OF RANCHO,.CUCAMONGA / DATE: June 28, 1989 TO: Chairman and Hemmers of the Planning Commission G FROM: Brau Euller; City Piann r BY: Beverly Nissen, Associate c inner suBJfCT: VARI?NCE 89-01 RANG A request to construct a trellis S ru etrr, n e ran `yard which encroaches Six.feet into the from yard setback at 6466 Jasper Street - APO: 1062- 621-68 ii The Planning Commission reviewed the above-referenced project thfAir June 14, 1989 meeting. At that time, the„Commission determined iikt-the proposal was acceptable Ad directed staff to return *ia the Comnis#i%;; i with the attached Resilution of ApprovaVI'With finJings, 5Reully pixitt ne BB:BN:ko Attachments: Jane 14, 1989 Planning Commission Staff Report, Resolution of Approval 4 ITEM E CITY OF RANCHRGtECUCAMONGA -� DATE: June 14, 1989 TO: Chairman and Cambers of the Planning Commission _ FRQ14: Brad Buller, City Planner SY: Sevrrly Nisst►, ciate Planner SUBJE;CT� VARIANCE 89-01 _ LANa - A request to construct a trellis structure n -he -41nnt yard, which encroaches six feet Into the front yard setback at 6465 Jasper Street - APH: 1Q92- 527'_58. I, P WECT AND SITE DESCRIPTIOR: A. Action Requested- RevieK 1bria9cee,Mequest. B. Surroundini Land Use aid Zonir; North - Si ng a am"fyfnsal; Low'Rens� xesideniill (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Single family residential, Lora Density Residential Aft (24 dwelling units per acre) East - Si nJle family rest denti4, Low Densi ty Resi dsntial (2-4 dwellino units per acre) West - - Single family residential a Lova Density Posidential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) C. General Mann Designations., W_0TK_ 'W- LOW K4siCOntial (2-4 c#vel ling units per acre) 140rth Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Loa: Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) i East - Low Resi`denti61 (2-kdwelling units per acre) Vest - Low Residenticl (2-4 dwelling units per acre) II. ANALYSIS: A. General: Toe apNli-ant is requesting ,1 construct a trellis structuvo in their front yard, which, would encroach six (6) feet into the minimum required setback of thirty-two (32) feet. The proposed structure Is 2,.AKeady partially constructed. The appligaOt is requesting, the structure in l order^ to create a front yav� entry courtyard Qnd d shade the 1 front of the house from„the afternoon sun (see attached Letter). The lot is x2I.5 feet deep by 82.31 feet wide.(ID,OriD square feet) and is r�guiarly shaped. 'The surroundiig lots are all of similar size and shape. 1 i 4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF r'rPORT RE: VARIANCE 89-01 - LAW June, 14, 1939 , Pale 2, The Development Code prohibits trellis structures or similar patio-cover type strucWes within the front yard -setback area. These types of structures are typi-cally ,locAted in the rear yard or side yard of a Tot. 064ever, V4 'Code does provide for "eaves, roof projections awnings, and similar' architegW"41 features" Oich may project into the front-IL--d a maximum!distance of 3 fe'et, if the structure is "supporttld oni" at, or behind, the building setback line".: Although the ,; trellis may be considered an aochitectural feature simi '� tn� an awning, it would not meet the criteria of being-sup 4otcd only at or behin,1 the setback line. In either case, thii-would` not allow a 6-Not projection into the front�yardr, II1. FACTS FOR"FIRDIWGS: The follo"ing facts would not support the variance requRiff-a—a ,are contrary to the required f nl Mngs: 1. That the subject property is n t uni4ue with resptgct to size, shape. or topography. 2. A. 6-foot trellis could have been dnigne6 to attach to the AlSk front of the house which would have complied with the required setback. 3. Any removal of portions of the structure which have already been built due to the strict or literal interpretation and 0orcement of the. setback regulation would be a self-imposed hardship caused by proceeding without proper approvals from tAe Citiy. Based upon these facts, it- is the opinion of staff that the granting of this Variance would constitute a special privilege inconsistant with the limitations on offer propertios in the same zone. TV. CORRESPONDENCE Tht.: item has been advertised in The Daily Report newspaper and-public hearing notice.; were sent to a[T"prope es within 300 :feet of the subject site. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny r ance -U ` through adoption of the attached Resolution of Deiial.; If, however, the Commission determines that the proposal is acceptable and' that the required findings can be made, staff should -'be directed to return to the June 28, 1989 Planning Commission meeting,with a Resolution of Approval. ` PLANmiNG comi'SSION STAFF REPORT f RE: VARIANCE 89-q1 - LAW s June 14, 1589 ,Rt Page 3 Resp ully s tedr ,/Br er City Pnt�erL--'` 88:8N:k4 Att..,r.)ments: Exhibit "A" Letter from Applicant Exhibit "D" = L�,mtion Ma Exhibit "C4 Site Plan Exhibit "N* PerspectfVe,Sketch Resolution of Denial r 1J 4, �5 Ongin�!, Puny Quality A canopy-trellis addition to a frQna� house otaurtyard of approximately go sq.ft, encroach:. 'c. ` (, ,eon feat into the front yard (79') setback. Fou;. (-) 2 X 2' square concrete black pillars on the port.-:ern side of t1,e court,-yard support four (4). legs of a py-amidal trellis-sun _shade structure to Screen the front windows iron the Westerly sun.' The pillars are 0*-n" akay from ears other (2' frotl existing h,*use)L .n an east-west direction and 7'-4" in a north--south direction, The pillars are eight (7'-&") feet tali and ^the trellis_�embe,rs are approximately V on censer forming a open (unc;;:erebfl 'shade structure. Ibe courtyard is approximately 1.60 sq.ft. aaa a., �a �,-h e,Z L•e.rmA towards the strart reducing the overall height of the trellis stritc tune to"ai:;out a' high. The g�, and floor footprint of the Mouse a�tci aF�r age are about 2500 'sq.ft. on a- - 000 oq.ft, property and the house Was placed very near the street which creates; dif-rsculties for entry approach (in a traditSonal way) and for shading of the western race of the home-struct0're': The courtyard was designed :,to soften the e!'i:ry approach and creme, a 7_ar.sitior, from within and >without of the,`'-.^unt alo*r (or a buffer) for noise and light. The tr,�llis structure would be the final step in completing the area out because of the lack ox a front yard,,, ould' nsed P,crv4issiun from cite La.rtixyg ord!ilancGs to encroach into the typical 'rot,z yard set i ,.ck. The encroachv4ar, really 4aiy consists o? t-e open structure as Chem art .... sp. :i:ic rules t�sii er. .ray the pillars t�iemselves (uncovered) . Therer"tyre we ara sinPIV as�eu to mace the groperty rend neighborhood ,:orvir�f�Ytain;i,g all open and visable frontaga of the (roper 1$-. r p� r� a+" 3 �., If t a it irxay* .ik 't5'"� -aeon. + „ ��,ys .1,�. �r 1f� x , •s4 A s t aia 1 �. i r. B�,Se1K'L S 1 '8Yf 15 +xlp. t Jy 1 ,:k J °AWL - MR iO LAWN ROM ENTRY t COURT , GARDEN CITY CF EX Iffr. SCALE- Proposed Wood Trellis Existing Concrete Bl ock Pillars � I Courtyard \ Concrete Block Wall' s Grass Berm CITY CF ' KALEI. RESotltrlol *0. J A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHQ'4UC?*NGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING ,VARIANCE NO. 8,,GI,_,,A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A TRELLIS SMUCTME IN THE%,r`ROhT YARD OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED Al' 6465 JASPER STREET IN THE LOW 0!NSI`fY RESIOENTM DISTRICT (Z-4 .DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND MATING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APH: 1062-621-28 A. Recitals. (i) Gale b Judy Lang have filed an application for the issuance of the 'Mriance No. 69-01 as dflscr')ed in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter ir. this-Resol;.sioh, the subject Variance request is refereed to as "Oe application". M) On 3una 14, 1989, the Planning �osmission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and: concluded said hearing on that date. i (iiis All legal pre' 4.quisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution, NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and ri olved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as,follows: l 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on June 14, 198?,' including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as f6lcws: (a) The hpplicttion contemplates the construction of a canopy- trellis structure of 90 square feet and a height of approximately 12 ,feet which consists of a pyramidal wood trellis supported by four concrete pilars; and (b) The application applies to property located at 6465 Jasper Street with a street frontage of 82.31 feet and lot depth of 121.5 feet and is presently mprove:i with a single-family residence; and ;1 PLAri@ m GOMMISSICR RESOLIPfIoN No. RE: "YARIANCE 8941 LAW June �5, 1989 Page (e) The property to the north of the subject site is Law Density Residential', the property to the south of that site consists of single family residential and is designated Low Density Residential,: the property to the east is Low Density Residential, and the property to the vest is Low Density Residential; and (d) The trellis structure will Have a positive impact on the existing streetscape and ta ' enhance Yt; and (e) Ti`, irellts structure will be an attra ;:ive architectural feature which wi11`c(`,•N attention away from the dominant 4-car garage, and (f) The' trellis structure will proilde afternoon; shade to a west-facing building. 3. Based upon the substantial' .evidence Iarosented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upost 'the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above,r,,his Csmmissi.on'hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That strict or literal intpi�prretatisq apd enforcement of the specified regulations would result in practical di°fficult ,--or unnecessary fte �physical hardship Inconsistent with the ohjectives of the opment Code. (b) .''That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable ito the property involved or to the intendid use of 5 the property, that do rrot apply generally to other properties in the seine district. (c) Uat strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive. the applicant of privileges :enjoyed by ' the owners of other properties in the same district. (d) That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant, of special privilege inconsistent with the 'limitations on other properties classified in the same district. (e) That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, ov materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. ' 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Coesmission hereby approves the application. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. a - �d PLANNrNn,.cW, S3ION RF,SOLU ION NO. RE: VARIANCE 89-01 June 26, 1989 Page S. - t APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS ,28TH DAY OF JUNE, 190 PLANijING COW)ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO:CUCAMONGA i. } >l BY: at Fry . e , Chairman i- ATTEST: ra u er, c.esary ♦ a,.a o.nT .» e..-:..,a.-., ..i 3hrn ji�aRntrin CC?�'iS93oR' of + : City Rancho 1, wad uvt tcc q gc+.rcw+n,T . •ts - Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopteYi by thy=Planning 'Oowsissio"f the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meoting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of June, 1989, by the fo5lo.wiM v9te-to-grit: AYES: COMMISSIOMERS. NOES: COMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSTONERS: 1�` I 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 28, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Jeff Gravel, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONKNTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT reques to pre-zone approx ma e y acres o vacant. land located at the northeast corner of Highland and Rochester Avenues to a density of„rcrI-Residential {);-4 dwelling units per acre) APN: 225-15a-01, 02,0 , 04, 18. (Continued from June 14, 1959.) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 89-03 - reques o approve a aeTopmen reemen or approximately 25 acres, consisting of 78 lots at approximately 3.2 dwelling units per acre, located on the northeast corner of Highland and Rochester Avenues - APN: 225-152-01. 02, 03, 04 & 18.. ,(Continued from June 14,_ 1989.) I. ABSTRACT: The applications for a Development District Amendment pre-zone and Development Agreement are par; of a package of actions for development of 78 :nits (County approved tract map 13835 - see Exhibit V) on 28 acres of undeveloped land located on the northeast corner of Highland and Rochester Avenues. The applicant has requested arne-ation to the city. An application for annexation has been fA ed by the City with the San Bernardino County Local Agency Formation Commission. II. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting t:,e pre-zoning of approx m e y acres of undeveloped land as .part of annexation proceedings and in preparation of development. An application for approval of a Development Agreement for a term of 7 years is also requested. A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning; North - Existing single residence, within the County West Foothills Community Plan designated RES 4 (4 dwelling units per acre) PLANNING COMNISSIGN STAFF REPORT DA 89-03 & DDA 89-02 - 84ACKNOR HOMES J6re;28, 1989 Page 2 South - Foothill Freeway (Route 30),corridor. �f East - Vacant Flood Control (Day Creek Channel)/County kst Foothills Community Plan designated RCN (Rural Conserva ti orr) # WEst -. Caryn Planned Community. City designation Cow Residential (24 dwelling units per acre). 8. General Aran Designations; Project Site - County General Plan is RES. 4 14 dwelling units" per acre). C ty General Pi an is Low Residential,(2-4 dwelling units per acre) North - County General Plan is RES. 4 (4 dwelling units per acre). City General 'Plan is Low Residential (2-44 dwelling unfits per acre) South - City General Plan is Flood Control. East - County General Plan is RCN (Raral Conservation.{ City General ,Plan Cove Residential Flood:Control. West - City General Plan is Lows Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre). C. Site- Characteristics: `The site is vacant and undeveloped. Like Vie res o e northeast portion of the City, the site is: on an alluvial fan, sloping to, the Saudi. Vegetation on the site Consists of mostly alluvial fan scrub brush. The soil is coarse, mostly boulders, rubble and cobbles. IIS. ANALYSIS: A. General• The purpose of the annexation is tc,'nroceed with p ans 'or residential development and to participate in financina mechanisms for infrastructure which are in place or to be in place_in cooperat4on with the City., An application for annexation has been filed by the City with ! the San Bernardino County Local Agency Formation Commission. The applicant has not filed any further project applications with the County preri� ring to process through the City. The foilowiog analysts su*arizes the main points of the proposed i7evek.ilt Agreement. `1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DA 89-03 b'DDA 89-02 - BUCKMON HOMES June 28, 1989' Page 3 i B. Density: The City's General Plan desgnritian for this site is TUR "e dential- (2-4 dwelling units per acre). On December 19, 19Q8, the County of San Bernardino approved a tract map consisting of 78 pots. The density of the approved tract map is approximately 3,5 dwelling units per acre. The iounty's General Plan designation for this site is RES. 4 44 dwelling unfits per acre) and the City's is" Low- Residential (2-4 dwe`ilin8 units per acre). Therefore, the designations of the County's and City's general Plans are consistent regarding this site. C. Off-site Improvements The applicant will provide street Improvements o—n-Rochester and Highland Avenues. The improvements will be to City standards. Specific improvements lay the applicant are,. identified .in exhibit . "C"' of the Development Agreement.' O. Reimbursements: The applicant may request a credit against required ra Wage fees and road i"rovementr fees iit regards to infrastructure construction"-that exceeds the demands of the pro3ect. E. Fees: The applicant will pay the usual City fees which will eR—Wozen to the current fee schedule for 12 mrnths upon Approval of this, agreement. F. Special Districts: The Development Agreement.`wi11 "require the participation Ur spe4ial districts as needed to provide infrastructure for development, including' a Mello-Roos Fire District and a Police'Protection District.- G. Schools: In regard to school impacts to the Etiwanda School s r c , as required by the'District, the applicant will be required to pay fees based on the square footage of each residence. In addition, impacts on the Chaffey chvol District are discussed in the Fnvironmental Assessment section of this report. H. Parks: As approved by Community cervices, the ,applicant will pay park fees instead of setting aside arty Tand for parks within the development: I. Term: The term of the agreement will be seven (7) years,` Ili. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has completed the Initial Stud and reviewed the nv ronmental Checklist, Fart II of the Initial Study, and has found impacts that could occur but will be mitigated. PLANNING COMlR:SSION STAFF REPORT DA 89-r0 & ODA 89-02 - BLACKMON HOMES June 28, 1989 f Page 1f ,7 One of those impacts identii,,bd concerned impacts of StlAent enrollment to the Chaffey School Oistrio�. In a letter dated Jurie 14, 1989, Steven Butters, Director of Business Services for the Chaffey Schaol District, recommended two measures to mitigate the potential impact: 1r Blaclfa=6"Homes Inc. or designee not be;ng permitted to pull building permits unti'l after Mate funding for Rancho Cucamonga High School is secured or 2. Blackmon Homes Inc. tract participate in a Me110-Roos Community;,Facilities District or some other funding mechanism to augment development fees. Within the attached Devel'opmenit Agreer.rt of this Stan Report, � { Mr. Butters recommendation of number,. 2 has-been incorporated. (See action 3Pi of the Development ,Agreement.) Anc,arer potential impact, .ehicular, circulation, has been adlr*ssed and mitigated, through the provision of and acceleration and deceleration lanes and fair share contribution for a traffic signal per the attached county conditions of approval and the development agreement., 1 Based on the above findings, staff rec ends is ac,q of Negative Declaration' under the California Environment a'� Quality Act. + V. FACTS FOR FINDIMS;. The following findings may be made by the ann ng to .,for Development Agreement `99-03 and Devel'oprixnt D Ss o n Districts Amendment 89-02. A. `fhe intended hand use is compatible with the surrounding land uses in terms of circulation and intensity of use. B. The project will not have any adverse environmental impacts that cannot be mitigated. C. The project is in confor.rice with the goals :and objectives of the General Plan. VI. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in e a y meport newspaper, the property posted, and notices sent to a proper y orriers within 300 feet of the project site. l J� II PLANNING C0°91ISSION STAFF REPORT DA 89-03 & ODA 89-02' - SLACKMON HOMES 1 June 28, 1989 Page .5AOL V� VII. RECOMMENDATION, Staff recommends that the Planning Commission a�---T the attached Resolutions recommending approval , of Deveicpment, District Amendment 89-02 and Development' Agreement 89-03 to the City Council, Respectfully submyttedr ^ 48', Buller City Planner BB:JGspiA Attachments; Exhi bit "A:' - ili ci ni t y Map , Exhibit 'IS" —Site Map Exhibit "C" - Tract Map Resolution Recommending ApprQvai .gf 0DA 89-02 Resolution Recommending Approval of DA 8943 (including the Development Agreement 89-03) Y it i. `� rAdWL SUBJECT SM Wolf" e7�tits#��. a. \` a A AN __ \ t r � ISO t!a!�lle, �FR� a.'wAY � ND cc V ® 13rkAllt LIN! • ` d p � ".! CH CH Ya4�+�M i O:uICLBR J '.r��s. �rRr•aae .1 � 9001 HILL ' �� ®• 4 AMR !AI N • • �� TZ i ath IS • ••� 1T ,.,9tla.. W Y S — � X - •4 e SAN • RHAROtN F!4E11Y 5P , CITY OF ITEM A<mwxATm am VAMY MAP PLANNM D(VISK) t EXH18' .fix SCALE. r; y I 71 I,t,,s!ate/. IAI MOM. c �t � I'�v •�� V �� .' IL /Yfe.S tANYJ A'.;4,+.Seep•;arJ� • � Ai�.�,tl+.✓I�s' ��. R.w�ncrra� 6'i.�s�styats.4 4 �f u t'E'I OTY OF ITEM- anti«,89-03 r KMA TITLE: Site ids FI..,r1►.`v;*:iNG D(d'LSM EXHIBIT- '8' SCALE- E Original Poor Quality ....�' � �{..��!' ,uX`a �`�" 'fir w'�ii� ♦�� °�y� � tt...s w �iJ L .�. 1_r _y,.e• _ •r CITY OF C'UC-k. NGA Tom: A-21 MAII PLANNING �� �XHtBIT. `�SCALE- NONE , RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTi6 NOF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF RANCHO C°tCAMOHGA / CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT1 D%STRICT -IMENO?dENT 89-02 (BLACKMON HOMES INC.), A ilk--ZONE OF APPROXIMATELY 29 ACRES OF VACANT LEND LOCAyED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHLAIM AND ROCHESTER' AVENUES TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (2-4 DWELL fk!� Ui4[T$,;PER :ACRE), AND MAKTW FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THERCOF`- APR: 225-I52-01, 02, OS, 0A AND 18. A. Recitals. ( ) Slackmon Homes has filed an application for° Development District Amendment 89-02 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "tha application". (i i) On June 28, 1989, the Pl anni't.rg Cmai ssi on 'of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducated a duly noticed public,hearing on the Application and: concluded siI.d hearing on that date. (iii) All legal preregjisites to the adupti— of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined; and resolved by trze Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:' 1. This Cor"ission hereby specifically finds that-all of the set forth in the Recitals, Part A of this Resolution are trtse and correct. 2. In conjunction with this Development Agreement, an Environmental Assessment, in conformance with the requirements of the Californi-3 Environmental Qual'ty Act, has been prepared. The CoWiszion has determined that this project would not have a significant adverle effect sa the environment, hereby adopts a finding of no signifi,:>.ant impact on the environment, and recommends issuance of a Negative 'Declaration by the Civy Council. 3. Based upon substantial evidence,presented to this .Commi'ssion during the above-,referenced public hearing on June 28, I989,, incluON19 written and oral staff report+r, together with public testimov,, this Commission hereby specifically finds a�5 follows: (a) The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed Development. District in terms of access, size, and co.T. atibility with existing land use in the surrounding are4:, and , J PLANNIW COMMISSION RESOLUTION FdQ - DDA 89-M ' XACKMON HOSES INC. f June28, L989 s Page 2 (b) 'The praposed Development District pre-zone s�auld not have significant adv�-,tse impacts on the environment, nor the surrounding properties; and (c) Tne proposed Oavelopment District pre-zone is °in conformance with the'General Plan. 4. The Planning Commission of the-"ity of Rancho. Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of the,Applicztion. w APPROyED AND ADOPTED TFtS 28TH DAY OF JUPE,`1989. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY IF RANCHO'CUCAtoi NGA `c BY: CLarry T. e a rman ATTEST t brad Bul jer,—Se—cretary AAk I, Brad Buller, SecIretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereb.; certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly isitroddced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the E City of Rancho C' ugonga,-at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day: 01,` A9, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: CC''lws�_ F NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: � o RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLAWNG CO MISSION OF AIM= CUMONGA, CALIF(.AIA, RIE-CUM iENDIM APPROVAL OF DEVELPPMENT AGMEN REET 89-03 (BLACKMON HOMEc INC.) FOR APPROI—MTELY 25 ACRES OF VACANT LAND LOCSiTED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHLAND AND ROCHESTER AVENUES, AND MAft! _; FINOINGS IN SUPPORT T iEREOF APW 225-152-01, O-' 04, MM 18. Recitala. (I) California Government Code Section 56864 now. provides, in pertinent part, as follows: "The Legislature finds and,,�,decl ares that: (a) The lack, of certainty it the approval of development projects can result in a waste of resources., escalate the cost of housing and other 3evr<ropments to the consumer, and discovrage;investment irk and oommitment'to cer~±rrrehensive planning which would snake maximum efficSert utilization of -r-a:ources at the least economic cost to the public. (b) Assurznce to the applicant for a development project that upon dpprovel of the project, the applicant ma;, proceed with the prq;;ect in accorlance with existing policies, rules and regulations, and subject to conditions of approval, will strengthen the public planning process, encourage private participation In coaprcnensive planning, and reduce the econamic cost J development." (III California Government Code Section 56865 provides, in pertinent parts, as follows. "Any city . may enter into a Development Agreement with iaAy person having a legal or equitable interest it real property for the development of such property as provided in this article..." (III) California Government Code Section 56865.2 provides, in part, as follows: "A Development eg. reement shall specify the duration of the Agreement, tie permitted uses of the property, the density or intensity of use, the maximum height acid size of proposed buildings, and provision for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes. The Development Agreement may include condiitions, terms, restrictions, and requirements for subsequent discretionary actSo ems, provided that such conditions, terms, restrictions, and requirements for discretionary actions shall not prevent 1 development of the land for w4�*- uses and to the density PLMY41NG COMMISSION RESOLUTIOU NO. DA 89.03 - BLACKMON HOMES INC. June 28, 1989 Page 2 or intensity of devel-opment set forth in the Agreement..." (iv) Attached to this Resolution, marked' as Exhibit. "1" and incorporated herein by this reference, is proposed Development Agreement 89.03 concerning that property located at the northeast corner of Highland and. Rochester Avenues, and as legally described in the attached Development Agreement, Herainafter in this Resolution, that Agreement attached hireto as Exhibit "1" is referred to as "ths DevelopmentAgreement' (v) Concurrent with this Resolution recommending approval of this Development Agreement., the Planning Commission has adopted a Resolution oitt recommending approval of Develop - District Amendment 47-02 for the purpose of pre-zoning the property to,row Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre). (vi) On June 2p, 111,19, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a .duly gootIced public bearing concerning; the proposed Development Agree?adnt and concluded said hearing or,that %latee. fvii) ` All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have ar�urred. B. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the Panning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically' finds that all of the 'facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A of tlis:Resolution are true and correct. 2. In conjunction with this De.',qlopment Agreement, an Environmental Assessment, in confomity with the requirements of the California. Environmental Quality kb, has been prepared. The Commission has Aetermined . that this project would not have a significant adverse effect on the environment, and hereby adopts a finding of no significant impazFt on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration by the City Council 3, 7his Coprission specifically finds that; (a) The Iazation, dosign, and proposed uses set forth in this Development Agreement are compatible with the character of existing development -In the vicinity. (b) The Development Agreement conforms to the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 4. It is expressly found that the public necessity, general welfare, and good zoning practice require the approval of the Development Agreement. %PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DA 89-03 - BLACKMON HOMES INC. June 28, 1989 Page 5. This Commission recommends approval of the Development Agreement attached hereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY_OF JUNE, 1989.' r` PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE C17Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: _Larry 1. MNiel, a rman ATTEST: —Brad ou I I er., ziecre ary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Ccmission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the loregoing Resolution 'was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of.RanC:th Cucamonga, at'-',a,- rreeti%of the Planning Commission held on -the 28th day of June, 1989,--by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: i I N. a _Y RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED .MAIL, TO. Debra J. Adams Cit,• Clerk ,, L of rancho Cucamonv% P.O. Box 807 r Rancho Cucamonga, Cal'ifprnia 9f 6, 1 , BE LOAWKT AGRMWNT jC TKt S AGREEMENT i made and entered into as of the thirty-first day follow Ag final adoption of the ordinance approving it (hereinafter, the "Effective Date",) by and :between the CITY OF RANCHO 'CUCAMONGA, a municipal � corporation ("City' hereinafter)_ and Blackmon Homes, Inc. (hereinafter, referred to as "Developer") HIT„NESSETHt I, A. Recitals. (i) , California Government. Code Section,65864'provides as follows: "The Legislature finds a6d declares that: "(a)' The lack of certainty::::,in` 'the approval of deve)opment )objects cln result in a waste of resources, escfilate the cost of housing and other development to the ` cotliamer, and discourage investment in and commitment to ' ' col" rehensive planning which would make maximum icient 0i lization of "'resources at the least economic cost to the public. V. °'tbk Assurance to the appf,�cant for a development project that upon approval of the p�,pject, the applicant may proceed w -.t the project in accordanvi with existing policies, ,, rules and 'regulations, and subject to conditions of approval,` , will strengthen the public planning process, encourage private participation in comprehensive planning, and reduce the economic costs of devel'opment1 (ii) California Government Code Section 55855 provides in pertinent part as follows: "Arty city, , may,rnter into a development agreement with any person having a legal or equitable int� est in real. property for the'i* ;i-al opment of such property as provided in this article. '! (iii) California Government Code Section §6866.2 provides as follows: "A development agreement shall specify the duration of the agreement, the permitted uses of the property, the density or intensity of use, the maximum height and size of proposed buildings, and provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes. The dev,;iopment agreement may include conditions, terms, restrictiyiIs, and requirements for subsequent discretionary action, provided that such �( conditions,, teraw;; restrictions, and requirements for f subseque,r,c'ditcntionarY actions shall not prevent development of Swrrd for the uses and to the density or intensity of development set forth in the agreement. The agreement"may provide that construction shall ;he commenced within a specified time and that the project or any phase thereof be completed within a specified time." .2_ {iv) Developer owns fee title in and to- that real property consisting of approximately 25 acres in the unincorporated area of San Bernardino County now proposed for` annexation tu,,:1-ty. property is legally described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto' and herein fter is referred to as "the Site". (v) City�i General Plen,Designa� ion for the Site is Low Density Residential (two to four dwelling units per\acre). Developer and City desire to provide through this Development AgreQmert\pecific development criteria to be applicable to the Site upon its annexation GCity which will provide for r.aximum efficient utilization of the Site in accorda.we with sound planning principles. ;1 NO This Agreement i^, entered into pursuant ti the provisions of Article 2.5 of Chapter d,,Title 7 of the California Government Code com 45king with Section 65864 thereof. i (vii) City, has determined that the use and intensity of ase provided in this 1evelopment Agreement is consistent with the General Plana (Ti ii) As part of the process of approving this Agreement, City has i undertaken; pursuant to the California Environmental 'ljuality Act (/OCEQA"), the required analysis of the environmental effects which would be caused by the agreement and adopted a resolution documenting compliance with CEQA. 1 (ix) As further consideration for the assurances provided by this Agreement to Developer that Developer will not be.prevented from developing the Property, City has requesti:d that Developer provide, and is willing to provide, certain additional suafi and agreements to construct and transfer to the public certain additional improvements. B. Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, the pa�*iss her o, agree as follows -3- 1. Zoning/Pre-Zones Designations. The parties hereby agree that City`s zoning and prezonirg designation for the Site hereby is deemed to be Low Residential (L) District subject to, the specific term and provisions hereof which shall supersede conf' rting standards and requir mits-of the Low Residential (.L) District so tons �as this agreement is in full force and effect. e 2. - Tem of the Agreement. The term of the Agreement shall commence on the effective date and shall expire on December. 31, 1997, so long as Development remains in material compliance with tills Agreement, as from time to time amended. 3. Standards and Conditions. The toll (ling development. standards ,;1nd conditions shall govern tire_ development of the Site during the term hereof, subJect to the provisions of paragraph.i'hereinaboves �. A. City shall allow the Site to be developed to a density of, not greater than, the tract Map Crr 13835);i��proved by San Bernardino County, December 19, 1938. Development of the tract shall be in conformance With the City standards of the Low, Residential ( f District or as modified by the County Conditions of Apprcval. B. If ,required by City as a condition of development of the Site or any portion or portions thereof, Developer shall consent to the application of the Mello-Roos' Facilities Act of 1982y the tbnicipal Improvement Act of 1911, the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, the Improvement Bond Act ofs81 the. Landscaping and Lighting act of 1972, and any and all others ailabSe proceedings to provide for public conduit financing for thy=construction of ublic improvements req!ired as a condition to development of the Site or any portion or portions thereof. -4- C. In. lieu of the dedication of land located within the Site, AML Developer shall pay City's park fees required due to the residential development of the Site. Said park 'fees shall be calculated in accordance with standards in effect at the time any such fees are due and owing or subject to subparagraph U. Said park fees shall be payable for a lot contained within a final tract prior to the City release of utilities for occupancy of that ict for residential use. B. Subject Jto subparagraphs 2.E and i= hereinbelow, Developer shall pay any and all City fees required as a� result of development of the Site, or any portion or pd�tI)ions thereof, at. ratMs current at the ik�e payable, including, but nj-4illimited toM1 beautification fees, park fees, systems development fees, bi'16ding permit fees, plan check fees .and drainage fees. Cost of fees "half re�hect current fee schedule for 'the period of twelve (12) montt(s from the'!"�prov-al data of city Coune.l of this Development.. Agreement and the+"after all fees shall be based on the fee schedule in effect at that time. E. No drainage fees are required. Regional drainage would be as conditioned by the County,vtith any urainage lined needed being �nstalle.d by the Developer. ii F. Developed, may'request and City shall extend to Developer credit against required systems development foes only to the .extent of Developer's direct constructid@ costs incurre4 in constructing oversized facilities (i.e., facilities silkM to service areas located outside of the site) which are not located within the Sim, or abutting the Site. Prior to recordation, tie Developer shala4'�ontrf ute his fair share toward the future signalization of Highland Avenue at Rochester Avenue. His fair share is estimated as $14,400:00 based on� traffic report submitted by the Developer's Traffic Engineer. ' I Ci s G. Developer shall consent to the creation of an asses4ent district or districts. to prof de for the construction and maintenance of any and all lighting and handscapiug within public rights-of-wary within:the Site or abutting the Site pursuant to the landscaping-and Lighting Act of 1972 or,- if applicable, Developer shad consent to an annexation or annexations of the ±' Site or any portion or portions thereof to an existing assessment district formulated under said Act for that purpps2. H. If required by City as a condition of development of the Site or any portion or portions thererof, Developer shall conseni- io the application, of the Mello-Roos Faci?itiet Act of 1982,-thereto, rr Developer contribution of equivalent funds,\ construct regional drainage facilities,.. � I, Develolywent of the tract shall be in conformance with the requirements of the Development Code or as modified by the,,bounty Conditions of Approval and shall proceed throwgh thri normal design review process, J. Developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the potential Fourth 'Street Rock Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a deposit on any property. K. 1,1eveloper shall provide street improvements as set forth in Exhibit "C" SupNement to County Conditions of Approval for Tract 13835 regarding street imprsivements of Rochestei:,Avenue and Highland Avenue, i L. Developer shall consent to the annexation to the C�imunity Facilities District 88-2 in order to provide for continuous law enforcement services for the project, M. As determined by the affected school districts, in regards to school student population impacts, the developer shall not be permitted to pull permits and start construction until state Funding for Rancho Cucamonga { High School is secured, or the subject approved tract shall participate in a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District or some other appropriate school facilities funding program beyond the current developer fees, levied by the District. N. ;Developer wi11-provide each. buyer with a detaikad disclosure statement of all taxes and assessments on the property. Said disclosure , statement shall first be approved by the City Planner. 0. Developer shall comply to'�all Conditions of.Approval set forth December 19, 1988 by the San Bernardino icounty Board of supervisors for Tract 13835. (see Exhibit "8") { a. Applicability of City Ordinances. Except, as expressly modified herein, all substantive and procedural requirements and provisions contained in City's ordinances, specific plans, rules and regulations, including, but not limited to, its Development. Code, building code, electrical coda, fire code and plumbing code, as amended, shall apply to the development of the site pursuant to this Development Agreement. Further, any terms or phrases i contained herein for which ��there are definitions provicvad i.t,City's said Development Code shalt be deemed to be utilized in accordance with those definitions. S. Relationship of Parties. it is: understood that the contractual' relationship between Cf.4 and Developer is such that Developer is an p p , g e independent art, and is•not the agent of City for any purpose whatsoever and: i shall not be considered to be the agent of City for any purpose whatsoever. 6. General Conditions. `The parties further agree as follows: j A. Except as expressly set forth in this Agreement, no l representations of any kind or character have been wide to ono another by any k of the parties hereto or by any of the parties' agents, represent-,tives, `C I 4- relates. e1' p �. �:tt associates or attorneys with res eat to each subject to which this IMree B, This Agreement contains the entire agreermat of the parties with respect to each subject to which it relates. C. This Agreement can only be amended in writing, which writing must first be executed by all of the parties hereto. D. h'b provision of this Agreement may be waived, except in writing, which writing must be executed by all of the parties hereto. E. The parties hereto each agree that they shall execute and deliver to the other, upon ;request so to do, any and all documents reasonable and necessary to accomplish ar- videuce the. agreements contained in or contemplated by this Agreement. F. In the event that any party should default in one or more of its obligations provided In or contWtated by 'this Agreement, the defaulting party shall pay to the other all expenses incurred in connection with efforts to enforc4 such obligation, including reasonable attorneys` fees and costs, whether, or not suit be commenced. G. This, Agreement, all other documents and agreements provided in or contemplated hereby, and all rights and obligations arising therefrom shall be binding upon and insure to the benefit of the parties hereto and i their -espective heirs, representatives, successors and assigns. 6 f 7. Tndemnifi cation. Developer agrees to, aid shall, hold City and its elected officials, officers, agents and employNes harmless from liability for damage or claims for damage for personal injuries, including death,: and claims for property damage which may arise from the direct or indirect operations of Developer or those of his contractor, subcontractor, agent,, e-inployee or other person secting on his behalf which relate to the construction and nparation of the Protect. Developer agrees to, and shall, defend City and gig., r, its elected officials, officers, agents and employees with respec,; to actions for damages caused or alleged to have been caused by reason of Developer's activities is connectioi with the Pro3ect. Thia hold hari0ess provision applies to all damages and claims for damage suffered or a' , a to have been suffered by reason of the operations referred to in this Development Agreement regardless of whether or not the City prepared, supplied or approved the. plans, specifications or other documents for the Project. 8. Assignment. Developer shall_have the right to sell, ;rortgage, hypothecate, assign or transfer all or anj portion of this Site (as may be subsequently subdivided), to any .person or entity at any time during term of this Development Agreement, Any such transfer shall be deemed to Ainclude an assignment of all rights, duties and obligations created by this Development: Agreement with. respect to all or._any portion of the Site. The assumption of any or all pf the obligationt,of.Developer under this Agreement pursuant to any such transfer shall relieve Developer, without any act or concurrence by the City, of its legal duty to perform those obligations except to the extent that Developer is in default with respect to any and all obligations at the time of the proposed transfer. 9.. Amendments. This Agreement may be`ameno�d or caneeeed, in whole or in part, oni. by mutual written consent of the paroles and then in the I manner provided .for in California Government Code Actions 65806 �t seq. 111 10. Minor Amendments to Development Plan, Upon the written application of 'Developer, minor modifications and ctanges to the Development Plan may be approved by the City Planner pursuant, to the 'terms of Section 1 .02.07DA ("Minor Revisions--Administrative") of City's Development. Code and sutstantial d anges to the site may be approved by the ;Planning Commission pursuant to the terms of Section 17.06.010 (Design/Development Review).- i 11. Enforcement. in the event of a default under the provisions of this Agreement by Developer, City shall give written notice to Developer (,or ;_;I its successor) by registered or certified mail addressed at the address stated in this Agreement., and if such violation is not corrected to tNe reasonable _ge - A11- Z satisfaction of City Cathie, sixty (60) days after such notice is given, or if . not corrected within such reasonable time as may be required to cure tho breach or defau'.t if said breach or default cannot be cured within sixty (601 days (provided that acts to cure the breack or default must be commenced within said sixty (`60) days and must thereafter be diligently pursued by Developer), then City may, without further notice, declare a default under this Agreement and, upon any such declaration of default, City-"may bring any ar,;ion necessary to specifically enforce the obligations of Developer growing out of the operation of this Development Agreement, apply to any court, state or federal, for injunctive relief against any violation by DeveldJ-_r of any provision; of this Agreement, or apply for such othee relief as; may be appropriate. 12. Event of Default.. Developer is in default under thi z A*enia,.`_ upon the happening of one or more of the tollowirg events"or conditions: a. If a material warranty, representation '4%r statement is made or furnished by Developer to City and is false or proved to have been false in any; material respect Vfhen it ::as made, b. 1f a finding and determination is modal by City following an annual review pJrsuant to paragraph 14 herenbelow:, upon the basis`of substantial evidence, that Developer has. not cWplied in good faith with any material terms and conditions of this Agreement, after, notice and opportunity to cure rs described in paragraph 11 her-11nabove, or c. A breach by Developer of :any of the provisions or terms of this Agreement, after notice and opportunity to cure as provided in paragraph it hereinabove. 13. No Waiver of_Remedies. City does not waive any claim of del yt in performance by Developer if on perio(ic review City dues not enforce this L _ _10. 7 Agreement. kfiperformance by Developer shall not be excused. because performance by Developer of the obligations herein contained would be, unprofitable, difficult or expensive or because of a failure of any third party or entity, "other than City. All other remedies at law or :in equity which are not otherwise provided for in this 4renment are available`to the parties to pursue in the event that there is a breach of this Development Agreement. No waiver by City of any breach or dEfaalt,under this Development Agreement shall be deemed to be a wai'var of any other subsequent breach thereof or default hereunder. 14 Annual R-iview. During the tern of dais 15evelopment Agreement, City shall annually review the extent of, good faith compliance by 'Developer with the term of this Development Agreement. -Developer shall' file an annual r-port with City indicating inrarmativn regarding com pliance with the term of this Development Agreement.no later than duly 15 of each calendar year. If as a result:=of such annual review, O ty finds and'dete,mines, on the basis of substantial evidence, that Developer has not cokilled in good faith with any of the terms of conditions of this Agreement, City may terminate this Agreement, 15. Covenants. Run with the Land. All of the provisions, teens, covenants and obligations contained in this Agreement shall be binding upon the parties and their respective heirs, successor, (by merger, consolidation, or otherwise) and assigns, devisees, adninistrattrs, representatives, lessees, and all other persons acquiring any rights or interests in ;the Property, or any portion thereof, whether by operation of law or to any manner whatsoever and shall inure to thebenefit of the parties and their "respective heirs, successors (by merger, consolidation or othherwise) and assigns. All of the provisions of this Agreement shall be enforceable as equitable servitudes and constitute covenants running with the land pursuant to applicable law. Each covenant to do or r€fedin from doing some act on the Property hereunder (A) is for, the benefit of and is a burden upon every portion of Property, (8) runs _11 o r 1 with such lands and (C) Is binding upon each party and each successive owner during l': ownership o3; such properties or any portion thereof, and each perso Ang any interesf,Ahere n derived in any manner through any owner of such i— s, or any portion thereof, and shall benefit each party and its lands hereunder, and eacl�o*_her person sucxeeding to an interest in such lands. Notwithstanding any of th.e foregoing or in this Agreement to the contrary, any assignee or transferee or mortgagee which. acquires any right or interest in or with respect to the troperty or any portion thereof, shall flake and bold such rights and interests subject to this .Pgreement and shall not, hava been daimed to have assumed the DevelrVer's obligations or the other affirmative duties and obligations of Developer hereunder except: (i) to the extent that any of skh assignees, transferees or mortgages have expressly assumed any of the duties or obligations of Developer hereunder; (ii) if any such assignee, transferee or mortgage accepts, holds, or attempts to exercise or enjoy the rights or Wtorests of DeveLper hereunder, it shall have assumed the Wligations of Developer; and tiiil to the extent that the performance of any duty or obliga ion by Developer is a condition to the performance of a covenant by Developer, it shall continue to be a condition to,Developer'r :performance hereunder. }: 16. Mort aue, Protection. This Agreement shall be superior aid senior to any lien placed upon the Property, or any portion thereof, including the lien of any mortgage, Notwithstanding the foregoing, no breach hereof shall defeat„ render invalid, diminish or impair the lien of any mortgage made In good faitji and for valve and any acquisition or acceptance of title or any right or interest in or with respect to the Property or any portion thereof, b, a mortgage (whether under or pursuant to a mortgage, foreclosure, trustee's sale, deed in lieu of foreclosure, or otherwise), shall be subject to all' of i the terms and conditions contained in this Wo mortgagee shall have an obligation or duty under this Agreement to perform Developer's affirmative covenants of Developer hereunder, or to guarantee such performance; except that to the extent that any covenant to be performed is a condition to tho performance of a covenant by City, the 'performaace thereof shall continue to be a condition precedent to Zity's performance hereunder. 171 Each mortgagee shall have the right, (but not the obligation) for a period of ninety i90ti„ days after the receipt of such notice from City to cure or remedy, the claiui of default or, noncoarpliattce set forth it the City's notice. If the default is of a nature which can' only be remedied or cured by such oK)rtgagee upors obtaining possession; such mortgagee shall seek to obtain possession with diligence and continuity througtt:,foreclosurq, a receiver or otherwise, arsd shall thereafter rwtedy or cure the default or noncaapliaace within thirty (30) days after obtaining possession. If any such default or noncoarliance cannot, with Diligence, be remedie4 or<,cured within such thirty (30) day period, then such mortgagee shall have such additional time as may be reasostably necessary"to �k�,emedy or cute such default or noncomtai`Ance if such mortgagee commences cure during such"thirty 00) day perood, and`-':thereafter diligi-ntly pursues and completes such cure. 17. ,Hotice< Any notice required to be given by the terns` of this, Agreement shall be pr6id4;by certified mall, return receipt,requested, at the address of the`respecti\Te parties as specified below or at any other such address as may be later spe4fied by th6 parties hereto. To Developer: Blackmon Hones, Inc. 6864 Indiana Avenue, Suite 202 Riverside, California 92506 Atta: Jeff Blackman, President To City: City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C Pi?. Box 807 't Rancho`Cucamonga,/California 91730 Attu.-:, Jack lair,f'City Manager =13- 18. Reco� riling. In accordance,, with California Government Cede Section 65868.5, a certified copy, of this, Agreement 1�haii be recorded with the Recorder of San Bernardino County, California, immediately upon thii,Agreemee. becoming,.pffective. IN WITNESS W[(EREOF; '• a parties have exeo`ated-and entered into this Agreement as of the effective date of the ordinance approving this Agreement. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Dated:- By yor Dated:. BY OWNER: BLACKMON HOMES, INC. Dated': By it ] r —14- n t' j"i � 'ft ,< ` STATE OF CALIFORNIA } COUNTY OF Ss. {' on 1989, before . ; the undersigned a,04tary Public in and for said County .1-nd State, personally appeared`knov-�I me to be the h 7/ parson whose name is subscribed to the within instrument'°ard ;cknowledged that executed the,save;' WITNESS my ha,)d and official seal,. Notd:y Public in, and for said State i i '45— e f FOR rkumv"s List aft r M � u3Gm5�a' 1/L LOCKWOOD EN GINEERM City of 'Rancho Cucamonga(Affected Age ty).can 3/13/09 SURVEY No PANY, INC. � �n pn�..+— "l�p,��snt� ,. �;� aeo weo► aMotit aatmraid AN!4MTION LEGAL DESCRIPTION Alalto,C.attfofrtta42�78 oE3aurnaH mmg.no. 910t NEW UGAALL DEESCRIPTION All that ,portion of the WestA/t 2 of the East 1/2 of '!/ . the S �utheast 114 of Section � 33, T. 1 C1. R. 6 W, S.B.B. §!�M, being more particularly described ad follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of the South 1/2 of the. South 1/7 of the. Northoast 1/4 of the Southeasfi 1/4 of said Section 30, Thence S 89035109" E along the.North lime of said South 1/2, South 1/2,Northaast 1/1, Southeast 1/4 a d£stacne. of 660,00 , feet; Thence S 0°02'02" W a distance of 329.87 feet to"`tha South line of said �tortheast 1/4, Southeast 114 ,Section 30 2hence S 89°35' 21" E along the said line a distance of, 2.91 feet to the Northeast corner of the'West 1/2. Southeast 1/4, Southeast 1/4 of said Sectim 30; Thence S 0"04'02" W along the said East, line of the West 1/2, Southeast 1/4, Southeast 1/4 of Section 30 a distance of 1391.48 fast to the South line of l said Section 30 being the existing Rancho Cucamonga city limit line; Thence N 89036104" W along the said South line a distanca of 662.1a feet to the 5ou74west corner of said Southeast 1/4, Southeast 1/4, Section 30; Thence N 0° 02"02" along the said West line fthe East l/2, Southeast.1/4 Section 30 a distance of 1649.5E 5 feet to the true point of'bog ning' oQ�4fES5(pyA� P, . tv��oFy '�it UC VIL i //' ENVIRO COUNT RDINO NMENTAL : 1,AI IIn MANAGEMENT�� DEPP'��iTIVIEt�T C r9FF;l9HCliO `..'•. PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY 385North Arrowhead Avenue San garnardlno,CA 92415 01d0 1714!387fn 1, ,�\ JOHN N.JACUE //fI Land Management Dir. �t�i�t�( 90�1l1� OFFICE OF PLANNIN°u Sharon W.Hightower County Planning Officer OFFICE OF SURVEYOR Clauda'- "tmlinson.L.S. January 1989 Expires: December 19, 1991 County z'uJw�Qr OFFICE OI:BUILDING AND SAFET Larry L.',choelkoof,P.E. County Swrding Official Jeff B:ackmon Lockwood Engineering Blackmon Homes Surveying Co., Inc. P.Q. Bl _ _ P.Q. BOX 396 Riverside, CA 92517 Rialto, CA 92376 RE: 745WVLS8004251DCOI W199-62 745WVL88004251TTOI TR 13835 Dear Sirs: This will advise you that a tfter,'complation of the environmental review process, and due consideration tl4ereof, the above-referenced project was conditionally approved by the County .Hoard of Super- visors at its meeting of December 19, 1985. Said project �sas found to be in compliance with County policies and regulations and was approved subject to the conditions as set forth on attached pages 1 of 15 through 15 of 15. In accordance with the San Bernardino County Development Code, Section 84.0205(1) , all requirements specified on the attached sheets shall be met within thirty-six` (36) months after the date of this letter, or the Conditional Approval is void. one (1) extension Of time not to exceed three. (3) years may be granted. A written request mast be submitted,. with the appropriate fee, to the Public Information Counter at the address above, prior to the date of expiration. PLEASE NOTE: This will be the only notice given for the above specified expiration date. The applicant is responsible for initiating extension requests. Sincerely, EPWA/LAND HANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF PLANNING TE �R�AH 4L, Associate Planner West Valley Planning Team cc: SurveyorlLand Dev. Division cc: County Special Districts Environmental Health Svcs. County Fire Warden Building and safety- County Sheriff TR:rb r BLACM40N HOMES PAGE 1 OF 15 SUB/87-110/t�,`;;L9-62/TR 13835 Conditions o��,°Approval 12-19-88 GENERAL RKOtJ REMENT5 I. All lots shall have a minimum area of 71200 square feet, a minimum depth of one hundred (100) Feet and a minimum width Of 60 feat, (20 feet on corner lots) . In addition, each lot on a cul-de-sac or on a curved street where. the side lot lines thereof are diverging fi6ia the front to rear of the lot, shall have a width of not less than sixty (60) feet measured at the building setback line `as delineated on the composite development plan, 2. Where lots occur on the bulb of a cul-de-sac, a minimum log- depth of ninety ('90) feet Will be permitted. If t1he propc'�sed' depth is less than ninety ( -N.1 feat, a plot plan must be submitted to demonstrate that,a ., iigdabl&>>�ob area is -possible and to justify the lesser depth. 3. Roads within this development shall: be entered into the Covrity Maintained Road System. 4. The water purveyor shall be Cacampnga County Water District. 5� sewage disposal shall be by connection Tto cacamonga county Water District, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS STALL BE MET 2RIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP: OFFICE OF BUILDING AND SAFETY 6. A preliminary soil report, complying with the provisions of ordinance -2815 shall be filed with and approved by the Building Official prior to recordation of the final map. 7.. A geology report, prepared by a licensed geologist, shall be filed with and approved by the Building Official prior to recordation, A deposit to cover the casts of the review shall be submitted with th. "(3port. An additional deposit may be required or a refund issued when the coots do not match the deposit. The review costs shall be paid in full i prior to recordation of the final may DEPARTMENT oENVTFtONiRENTL F�EALTFI SE ylcEs a. The following ars the steps that must be completed to meet the requirements for installation and/or finance of the , on-site/off-site water system and/or sever system; * NON-STANDARD CONDITIONS) jelk 'A*ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATIVE MEASURES JG - 1 � SLAT MON HOMES SUDf 87-110/W11.3-62/TR 1.3934 P-hGE 2 or 15 Conditions of Approval 26�19-88 A. Where the syatem is to be installed prior to recd" daticn; The water system, firs hydrants. and/air surer system shall be installed in accordance with requirements of the State Health and satety Coda, and in ii;cordancefaith Plans approved by the water and/or sswaring utility and ;he governing ,fire protection authority. The plans shall be reviewed by a civil Engineer,registered in,the States of and contain required certificates and approval, signAtlies Zt is tha.dsveloper's responsi bility to submit to the OrFCIs op ST'RVjyPNL_ L NO DEVEi ANT.Ss ota, a copy or the approved plain and signed statwment fro'A the utility of jurisdtOtian confirming that the improvom. ent jz?2s boot install ed and $Ccepted. �. Where a brand is to be posted in lieu of installation of the imprar'ement: 1. The domestic water plan and/or sewer plan which meets the requirements. Q;' the State Health and Safety Code shall be reviewed Lie a Civil Engineer, registered in the State. o*,California, ar-1approved by the water or severing utility and the" governing fire prote,cti,on Authority The plan; 11 . contain the tegAired oerti.Picates and ;approvej Signatures. A copy of the approved plat4 :stzall be zubuio the 0 'XLQ tTF SUltttrgp;±,: aNg r p MENT SrCzLgn2 2. Said engineer shall determine the:.amount of bona necessary to install the improvements. a. This amount glue ton percent Shull he posted with the County QC San Bernardino. A statement signad by the enginesi� stating tha ., the amount of bond reco=oanded ig��equate to coast the cost of i stallatia�, of the improve° jnt Shall be included with the estimata`'and' subz,tt:t?,_,ej to the 'Zw.4'1i" b� 1iaV$Yi?R ANb b. Or, in Casea where the vatax agency or sawaring agency ? .,a govern-mental subdivision, the bond in t r --mount of 110` percent of the cast, Of installation of the improvement may be statement x.rOmma that ced iigertc�r stating that dfinancial * NON-STANDARD =NDIT10g(S) *ENVIRONMENTAL IXTIGATIVE MEASURE - ,�` Sa BLACKMON HOMES PAGE 3 OF 13 SUB/87-110/W119-62/TR 13835 Conditions Of Approval 12-19-88 arrangements have been completed shall be sub'Z fitted to the OFFICE OF SURVEYOR LAND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION. 3. Prior to release of the bond for the improvement, the utility of jurisdiction shall; submit a signad statement confirming that the improvement has been installed and meets,;the requirements of all appropriate State and County laws pertaining to such improvement. It is the developers responsi- bility that such signed statement is filed with the OFFICE 6F SURVEYOR LA D vx **9. An acoustical', study shall ((lie performed to assess noise levels at the dJ,;iopNfent and,,, shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Environmental Healtil Services prior to recordation. Prior to issuance ofbuilding persaits a report stating that the recommended mitigation measures hava~..been implemented shall bn submitted to the Dgiartment of Environ,i mental Health Services, COUNTY E`iRE AGENCY ; , 10. The development and each phase thereof shall have two points' of vehicular access for .fire and othtr emergency equipment, and for routes of escape which will safely handle evacuations as required in the Development Code. 11. Water systems designed to meet the required fire flow of this development shall, be approved by the Fire Agency. The developer shall furnish the Fire Agency with two copies of the water system improvement plans for signature and a letter from the Water Purveyor stating the availability of the required fire flow prior to recordation. -Water systems ' shall be operational and approved by the l re Agency or bonded for prior to recordation. Prior tr,.any above grade construction occurring, water .for fire protection shall be operational and approved by the Fire Agency. 12. Six (611) inch mains shall be required. *13. Due to the project being in high hazard terrain, hydrants must be spaced at 400 foot intervals. *14. Due to the project being in high hazard terrain, the Fire flow shall be a minimum of 1500 gallons per minute. NOTE: !_ydrant spacing may be increased and fire flow reduced, NON-STANDARD CONDITION(S) **ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATIVE MEASURES BLACKMON HOMES PAGE A OF 15 SUB/87-110/W115-62/TR 13835 Conditions of Approval 12-19-88 should the developer decide to install automatic fire sprinklers in all the residences. **15. Developer shall commence,, participate in and consummate, or cause to be commenced, participated 3n, or consummated, a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District for Foothill Fire Protection District, to finance a fire station to serve the development, ix`aludng land facilities, equipment and operations and maintenance The station shall be located, designed and built to all specifications of the Foothill, Fire Protection District,., and shall .;acome the District s property upon completion, " The equipment shall be selected by the District in accordance with its needs. In any building of the station, Developer shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations. The CFO sh;tll be formed by District and Developer by the time of recordation of the final map. OFFICE OF SURVEYOR I� ' DEVELOPMENT/DRnTNnrF SECTION 16. Flowage easements or San Bernardino County Drainage Easements shall be obtained where diversion or concentration of runoff from the site or drainage facilities dewaters onto private property. 17. Adequate rolls shall be provided on the- �.,ntrance roads to the site at Rochester to minimize the p6,.st bility of street flow entering tho site. 18. Adequate provisions shall be made to intercrIpt-.end conduct t^A offs-site tributary drainage flow around or through the site in a manner which will not adversely affect adjacent or downstream properties. 19. Adequate San Bernardino County Drainage Easements (minimum 15 feet wide) GIVA11 be provided over the natural drainage courses and/or drainage facilities. The easements shall be designed to contain the 100-gear frequency storm flow plus bulking and freeboard per County Standard Criteria. 20. In addition to the Drainage Requirements stated here ?.,, other 'ton-siteP/or "off-sitell improvements may be required which cannot be determined from tentative plans at this time and would have to be reviewed after more complete improvement plans and profiles have been submitted to this office. NON-STANDARD CONDITION(S) **ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGA'TTIVE MEASURES BLACKMON HOMES PAGE OF 15 SUB/87-110/W119-63''TR 13835 Conditions of Approval 12-19-86 *20a. Provide a storm drain uioe frosg the sip a to Day Creek Basin or Day Creek Channel to connect to the Caryn protect drainage Added by B.O.S. systam. The connection to the Caren project drainaaea system 12-19-88 ruuld be subject to payment OE reimbursement for oversizinat, to the devalo Er�E that pr, -,a *2.1. Approval shall be obtained from the San Bernardino County Flood Cantr(,i District that the site is adequately protected from the 100-year design storm in accordance with Federal Emergency Management Agency (FERA) regulations and the t , County Develol)ment Cade, *22. The developer's en;ineer shall obtain or provide the necessary engineering information to forward to FEMA in order to have tha site removed from the flood plain,. This information shall consist of copies of the plans of flood facilities now under construction, and the hydrologic/hydraulic calculations put into the format acceptable to FEMA (Hec 1, 2). *23. The applicant shall contribute his fair share to the nay Creek Channel Project. The. amqunt shall be determined by the Flood Control District, based on acreage. *23a. The tract shall not be released for occupancy until Phase Added by H.O.S. TIA o Duy Cree C gone s aomp e e an opera ona , 9-88 OFFICE 07 SURVEYOR LAND DEVELOPMENT/ROApS SECTION 24. Road sections within. and/or bordering, tract shall be designed and constructed to Valley Road < indards and West valley Foothills Community Plan standards Of San Bernardino County, and to the policies and requirements of the County Transportation and Flood Control Department in accordance with the Mastar Plan of Highways. 25. Any grading within the road right-of-way prior to the signing of the improvement plans shall be acyomplished under the direction of a Soils Testing Engineer. Compaction tests of embankment construction, trench backfi7•l, and all subgrades shall be performed at no cost to San Bernardino county and a written report shall be submitted to the Contracts Division of the Transportation and Flood control Department, prior to any placement of rase materials and/or paving. 26. Final plans and profiles shall indicate the location of any existing utility facility which would affect construction. * NON-STANDARD CONDITION($) **ENVIRONMENTAL MilftGATIVE MEASURES BLACF4409 HOMES P.KGE 6 of Is SUA,/a7-110/WII9-$2/TR ];3835 Conditions of Approval 12-19-88 - 27. Slope rights stlall be dedicated on the final tract map where necessary. 28. A thorough evaluation of the structural toad section, to include parkway improvements, from a qualified materials engineer, shall be submitted to the Transportation and. Flood Control Department. 29. 'Existing County roads which w,.11 require reconstruction shall remain open for traffic at all tines, with adequate detours, during actual construction. A cash deposit shall be made to cover the cost of grading and paving pri+sr 1-0 racorda- tion ok the tract map. Upon completion of the grading ar„d paving to the satisfaction of tna Transportation and Flood Control Department, the cash deposit may be refunded. 30. Vehicular access rights shall ke dedicated on Highland Avenue, future State Highway 30, Rochester Avenue, Vintage Drive, and along the rear ofdouble frontage lots. *31. Future state Highway 30 right of way, including any interchanges or grade separations, shall be reserved along the project frontage and shown on'the my as per the Cal Trans letter of August l8, 19s8, 32. All road names shall be coordinated with the County Transpor- tation and Flood Control Department, Traffic Division. 3,3. Road improvement plans for Hi&1,1 nd Avenue-State Highway 3o shall.be submitted to the State Department of Transportation by a registered civil engineer. 34. Dedication shall be granted on Highland Avenue-State Highway 30 as necessary to concur with the Master: Plan of Highways. This dedication is to be coordinated with the State Department of Transportation. 35. An approved type wall or barrier shall be required alon{. the rear of double frontage lots, and shall be constructed of -aide of public right-of-way. 36. All required road and drainage improvements shall be bonded in accordance with the County Development Code, unless constructed and approved prior to recordation of the Final i 37. Turn arounds at dead end streets shall be in accordance with the requirements of the County Transportation and Flood NON-STANDARD CCNDITION(S) **ENVYRONMtNTAL+ MITIC-ATIVE MEASURES ,« I BLAC101ON HOMES PANE 7 OF 13 SUHf 87110/W719-62/TR 1.3835 Conditions of Approval 12-19-88 Control Department, and the Forestry, and Fire Wa}den Depart- ment. 36, Existing Utility poles shall be shown on the improvement plans and relocated as necessg.ry ,without cost to the County. r 39. The developer :shall, make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests ane if he or she should fail to do so, the developer shall at least 120 days to submittal of the final map, ente-into an agreeent prior coral; eta the improvements pursuant to Governgant Coda Section 66432 at such time as county accpaires t-' property interests required for the '-nprovements. Su�d,z agreement shall provide for payment by developer of all ` by County to acquire the offs;ite grope Bests incurred rty interests required in connection with the subdivision. Se3gprity for a portion of these costs shall be in the fors of a cash deposit in the amount givers is; an ppratsal, repo:- ` obtained by developer, f, at developer Is cost. The apprai, --; shall have bean approved by County prior to Commencement mof the appraisal,. 40. Right-of.,taay `and improvements" (including off-site) transition t_affic and drainage 21bws fro- proposed to existing, shall be required as naceasary. Adhk 41. Trees, irri ation astems installed o�ag y I leer�dscaging required to be pt bli�; rJ ght of way within t:`tis tract area shall be maintained b. ,other than the County Transporta- tio,n/Flood Control. Dena; anent, and shall be as specified in County Transpurtationj�Aood Control standards, for tree planting. Maintenance procedures acceptable to Transporta- tior �sd Control Departzen+* shall be instituted prior to reoorcaaLion. **42. Prior to recordation, the applicant shall contribute his fair share toward thn future signa:lization of Highland Avenue at Rochester Ave. ;: Hj,e fair share is estimated as $14.400.00 based on a 'Traffic Report submitted by the applicant's ' Traffic Engineer. 0 FTC, OF P zrrs�r 43. Commitmi nt thall be obtained, in writing, from the sewering 1 agency. Said commitment shall indicate: that the agency has i the capacity to furnish sewer service, to the subject project, 'k?ad f' all necessary arrangements have been made with the , agency to supply such. services. A copy of the coroiit Gent i shall be fixed with the Office of Planning. J * NON-STANDARD C0NDITION(S) I**ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATIVE MEASURES l BLACKMON HOMES PAGE 8 OF 15 SUS/87-110/WI19-62/TR 15335 Conditions ofApproval 12-19-SS 44. Developer shall provide for street lighting within the tract as follows; ' A. Low intensity, energy-efficient street lights at all t intersections; F B. 'Install underground cone4it with a pull cord (for future i=istallation of additional lights) through the tract: C. Deposit monies with the 4­10Ecial Districts Department 4.n cover all installation and co7nn;action charger r additional street lights per adopted County policy regarding light pole spacing and location. J. prior tq recordation, the tract shall be annaxad to the i appropriate.district to prcride ;street light maintenance. I 45.. Subdivider shall present evidence to the County Surveyor's f Offica that he has tried t�j obtain a non- nterrerence letter F from any utility company th at may have rights of li easement wit'ain the property boundaries. 45, Easements of r cL d not shown on the tentative map shall be relinquished or relccated.. Lots affected bProposed � easements or easements of record which cannot be religutshed or relocated, shall be redesigned. 47. The following buildilq Setback lines shall be delineated on the ;;omposite development plan: A. A variable front Bard buildiltq setback line of at least 22 fe&t and averaging at least 25 feet. adjacent to.sid— streets on corner lots. B. A side; yard building setback line of at Least 15 feet 48. Four ! Zopies O� -u`Landscaping plan shall be submitted for Offices of Planning review and approval. Said Landscape Plan shall include the following. A. The required slope planting. Slope planting shali be required for the surface :of all cut slopes more than five (5) fast in height and fill slopes more than three (3) feet in height. Said slopes shall be protected against damage by erosion by planting with grass or ground cover plants. Slopes exceeding fifteen (15),feet in vertical height, shall also be planted with shrubs, spaced at not toy,exceed ten (lo) feet on centers: or, * HON-STANDARD =NDITION(S) *ENVIRONMEJ;TAL 2 gTIGATIVE MEASURES BLACKMON HOMES PAGE 9 OF 19 SUB/87-110/14119-63/TR 13835 Conditions of Approval 12-18-88 trees; spaced at not to exceed twenty (20) feet on centers; or a combination of shrubs and trees as aoverV plants. The plants selected. and planting methods usad shall be suitable .or the soil and climatic conditions of the site. Treo's 10% 15 gal.; 40t ; gal,; 50t 1 gal. Shrubs 20& 5 gal.; so% 1 gal.; Gr..o;.zdcover loot coverage. B. The required street trees- C. All required walls. All',' decorative walls. shall be designed and Constructed to incorporate design features such as tree planter walls, variable setback, split b3Eck face, columns, or other ouch features to provide visual and physical ratief aorg the wall face, I D. Any existing trees to remain on sits. Any hxisting eucalyptus tree* to be retained shall be topped to thirty .(3o) feet, tried along the lower fi` 1110-In (15) feet, 44d dlOared of All dead leaves and brani;hes. Aft imp jAA13 ..)40 / ,�f/, ' 1 `df> i�p ixt'�! �// �t ' P�A4t'dA1.1 Rkvsc-� by 8.0.5. ��i4+�/�'�SY��fk����'/�$�f�?'�.�A'�e�'/�i /I� '/ *E. Parkwa5r�t re�tme�ts or Rochester and of D�g�. n�.an,,,,t shall_-be designed to hatch aobroved plans car tn,� }he city of Ranoho Cucamoncr#� s Carvn "�evr�loam ,-ol r% Said n?ans, _shall ba reviewed and "p "'' ----- s_ ved byhe tv _of Ran:�ho Cucamoa� a !error to recordation of the � A t moo. zn addition permanent maintenance of these .zmbrovem�a�+ts sh;a11 be assuredthrouah the cre,, Lion oPfor annexation of this area into a land scamina and i �.iahtina assessment district I 49. Four (4) copies of an irrigation plan shall" be submitted for Office of kanninev review and approval when slope planting is required. Slopes required to be planted shall be provided with an approved system of irrigation, designed to co-,dr all Portions of the slope.. A functional test of the sy-.'em iaay be required. The maintenance of g• aded slopes and landscaped areas shall be tho responsibilifiy of the developer until the : NON-STANDARD CONDITION(S) "ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATIVE MV'ASURES ' ArIACKHON H014E5 PAGE 10 OF 15 SUB/87-110jw119-b2fTR 13a3S conditions of,Approval 12-19-88 transfer to individual ownership or until the iogntenance is officially assumed by a County Service. Area. All irriga- tion systems, where reguj:-*ed, shall be designed on an individual. lot basis unl ss commonly maintatined in an approved manner. 50. A Minimum number of one (),) inch caliper'f3 gallon, multi-branched trees shall bet-slanted on the lot: adjacent, to the street right-of-way for each C7f the following types of lots: A. Cul-de-sac lot - 1 tree; B. Irterior lot - 2 trees; C. corner 1ct - 3 trees. The variety of tree to be .provided ,,�subjegt to County approval and to be maintained by the property owner. 51. All landscaping and irrigation shown'on the approved l;andscupe and irrigation plana and,all, equirad walls shall be completed or suitable bonds posted for their compleition. *51a. A revised master plan showing the new subdivit41nn as i;. relates to the adjacent prooert cis i:a tht east psi cat nsr Added by B.O.$. cir� tl3tian snd access oznts fog' fuure`;leVglo menu sna12 12-19-88 be submitted tQ and a rovad boy the C y of Ran a Cucamonga pr or to recordation of t a �n�1 roc map,_ *51b. The "A" Street connection to Rochester Avenue shall be re esz ne as a cu - e-sac W1 emergen YVII, ccess Connect3o`n Added by B.O.S. to Rec es er �renue n.a �: ion, sa c1" "ea'gnor an 12-19-88 alternative ve es n s a a reviews an approve y o t e C t o Inc o ucamonga an a oo i re zs tic r or o rsCor aIon o� a ina Ea-Er- map. *51c. This tract ma have to be Modified to provide an sxtensi.on of aiEu street Lo , , e a = aces areas:to e east., uc -Added by B.O.S. determ not on s a e ,ma a ay e L y_o Rancho ucamanga L2-19-88 tz art rev aw an a rova o a rev se mas er •P an o e act acent area. Sa rev ew an any- a es�an. s a e require Ar or o recur a ion o e zna rac_map_ *51d. 'Prior to recordation, an annexation/daveloplent agreement ,Added by B.b,S, shall be est zs e e wean a apg roan z�n�s" " ,` —tFf 12-19-98 tt.ncho Cucamonga. NON-STANDARD CONDITION(Z) "ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATrig MEASURES lr- r BLACKMON HOMES PAGE 11 OF 15 OUB/87-110/W119-62/TR 13835 Conditions of A9proval 12-19-88 PERMITS SHALL NCI: BE ISSUED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING CONDITTONS HAVE BEEN MET.- OFFICE OF BUILDING AND SAFETY 52.. For projects whare grading is to be done, grading plans are to be submitted to and approved by the Office of Building and Safety, 53. Obtain a demolition permit for any building to be demolished. Underground structures must be broken in, back-filled and inspected before covering. 54. Submit plans and obtain building parmits for any required walls. 55. An erosion and sediment control plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building official prior to any land disturbance betr, n October 15th and April lath. 56. A tree removal plan,'7permit and preconstruction inspection in compliance with the county's plant protected and �nagement ordinance shall be approved prior to any land disturbance and/or removal-of any protected trees or plants. COUNTY FXR1 AGENCY *57. All roofing materials used in thi'i project shall be of a ` non-combustible material. Treated materials of a temporary nature will not be accepted. OFFICE OF SURVEYOR LAND DWELOP'MENTIDRA E SECTION *58. A permit-shall be obtained from the City of P.ancho Cucamonga for work necessary within the city streets, such as storm drain connections. - OFFICE OF SURVEYOR LAND DFVE MENT,, DS SECTION 59 An encroachment per-:it, or authorized clearance, Shall be Obtained from the County,Transportation and Flood Control Department prior to issuance of a grading permit by the O`°fice of Building and Safety. 60. An encroachment permit shall be required from the State Department of Transportation pritir' to any construction within state right-of-way. # NON-STANDARD CONDITIONS) G **ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATIVE MEASURES Ole � a -ye l xe ,ILse }1 nave Bach o$' a 1 S R 1312 1 a eVVNN,t 5-Tea eC;,.t exe IF a on mot 0°"19- �loAt uildinc� R xe na1�� a;,5ei�5 ux ,i1-les u < S5 �`;8 A44 to mapx veinTi to y� hid a�°�o -less o six , p ink off' o$ Andy t5 �ubjsite, Toyed PThe c o$ p�1 +y� g'QTotguctllaj iet1 e Pin ta d�Qd anal G nx" 'o�o�ec.ye °e '�jeb�n 5uoz t�xa� et`1 i �pl.e 5 of owjn9' Ole 9 tes, p pha "'a,11 Iota d sad 1�x pu�'3"�the gol the•' i�t� �a Tv� ent an $ off� ix 'Qu33{ xercg ov can has' why ect xo ect s $ }�e can• r e s on e pxo9 tg inp 'P'L a caes o$ a cot► t�t. f? tent Conyt ce wi° "if as dxa eaendea %bg with a}� i �nY o Ted. 50as,a aid%na yttg$lci.a�� oo plies GoP a $, a aihax�uItain v¢L a °x Thg S�xv.eSi lar► steal aze o£ the ` -Loll- es " St °$ 1cto a 3.t9 t o got Gn r,'d Y n2Y► Oa 5epoli pew oPxia Sect xe ant es o$ h �y ot builai n �irX co�e$o t puxsa ° i5sva pall atio niaGo��ori°� thagai5gat� sied• Ysg tot ° to till 11$a� aiCa d o$ lager iI. xadi tl $ pxAox dg cex by ca e� de 1a°ax al has 5''I d Sa$e e1 11: 62, •gxogeq,;izeer chaovgx"on�53°gol e -Tea. e i• 'yLj�. sloes d a arY tMl cSsecti per o$ $`� a. $.� 1 an �cs at�'a ied gY cede an snag�gfj�g cut an I of. 2 o Setla o$ Govexnm �xaai yvkt a tteto Ail O's g�' ope Taft 1�lo a. inin $finale s``gym coval. xim'� g hyxt shs!'1 tAx -3. 5ha1 a and epp to a refight °glcpee I fig na xev- e 1i:,A't0 . ecT jOajpott %l bt. wittn gxisti 'AOtVeen A, sla o� op tue 51ope to blend Wittlri or - slay-'- i1Z lot wY�gn dopey YgT°Q Be c Uxs• the down aGct�`xe$ tY►g �tr a ��1d �cov t of 'Bea pa ai 10 s• is g�x'nti) t,�11,na is O�Pe sc 1 p aka d• C• idu , + Y'®i 1 1c►g a G� atuxall `AY o 'Ae gca>z pe dad na�ci vgx i os• ��� a paxce axea xadin9 scowbe c •e3'g�at wall n a 101 of t unle5e 4• R,.Ste the to ninae�eiieV4 Gi), eat ea x6 },.. &m A xs bg e1 e$,. :; p e clud�ng 5ha11 and 1°wnot pg ".cam iux�osesg hicjh9 shall r a usi you hheight lsl �AS Mai p cov�Z * GAT V� �E� �J IF j' f _ i 1 rA: �.w is BEACKMON HOMES PAGE 12 OF 15 SUB/87-110/Wll9-62/TR 13F35 Conditions of Approval L-Ia--88 *61 Projects subject to a building permit shall, have all required on and., off-site improvements, required for each phase, completed :and arjjroved prior to final: inspection of any buildings or structures.. The term"l'phasaff`as used here shall mean the following: 'The block of building permits drawn on less than the whole project" or "A plan of building construction which indicates blocks car construction of less than the whole projegt' In each phase, the installation of any on or off-sits improvements shell be sufficiently completed so as to assure protection from sto,rz or drainage run off, a. safO and driveable access for fire and safety, and the ordinary and intended use of the buildings or ftructures The Building Official, 'with the concurrence .of the Off:ce of the Surlfepor, may approve any plan or approve " a change ;;o an approved plan, which complies with the intent of this pcticy., OFFICE OF PLA�TN'f ,C *62. Prior to issuance of building permits the developer shall provide certification from the approprk6teischool district as required by California Government Coe Section 5.3080 (b) that any fee, charge, dedication or other form or requirement levied by the governing-board of the 'district pursuant to Government Code Section 53080(a) has been satisfied. 63. A final grading plan shall be required. Said grading plan shall be submitted to the Office of Building and Safety for review and approval. All on-site cut and fill slopes shall: A. Be limited to a maximum slope ratio of 2 to 1 and a maximum vertical height of thirty, (30) feet.. Setb sks from top and bottom of slopes shall be a minimum of one-half the slope height. B. Be contour-graded to blend with existing natural cont'.rurs. C. Be a part of the downhill lot when within or between individual lots. *64. Recommended maximum heights for manufactured slope banks are listed below. Vertical height shall be the measurement - between the elevation of the toe and top of the slope including ,;staining walls. The natural slope for grading Purposes shall be determined on a parcel b using the high and low elevation of the area torbelgraded. Maximum heights shall not be exceeded unless grading can be rg NON-STANDARD CONDITION(S) **E?e' tIRONMENTAL MITIGATIVE MEASt'RES a BLACKMON HOMES pRa._r, 13 or is SUB/a7-ll0;/Wll9-62/TR 13835. Conditions of Approval 12 19-88 AWL si,-n ficantly reduced by increased height. �jAlternative ' de' '3ns that would reduce slope heights are prcierred. Any. bank' exceeding twenty-give (25.) feet, regardless of length, . shall have variable gradients. A. The maximum, slope height w17ere the natural terrain is ten (10%) percent or Tess, is ten (10) feet. B. The maximum slope height where the natural terrain is greater than ten (lot) percent but less than or equal to fifteen (10) Percant, is fifteen (15) feet. C. The maximum slope height where the natural terrain exceeds fifteen (15$) percer.t, is_thirty' '�30) feet:. *65. During construction, measures shall be taken to control runoff from construction sites. Filter fabric fences, heavy plastic earth covers, gra*!el berms or lines of straw bales are a few of the techniques which should be cor.aidered.. *66. Grading sha31 be phased so that pakompt revegetation or construction can•control. erosion. '' Whe; 'a possible, only those areas which will later be resurfaced, '-landscaped or built on is hould ba, disturbed. Resurfacing of parking lots and roadways should take place as soon as practicable, not at thi completon"of construction. 67. A coKy of the final grading plan, approved by Building and Safety, shall be submitted to the .Office of Planning when graded .cut slopes exceed five (5) feet in height and fill slopes exceed three (3) feet in height. -I SUBJECT PROPERTY SHALL NOT BE OCCUPIED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS HAVE SEEN MET: COUNTY FIR GENC 68. Address numerals shall be a minimum of four inches in height on a contrasting background, and shall be visible from the street. During the hours of darkness they shall be internally „ illuminated. (Standard No. 122). 69. Each chimney used in conjunction with any fireplace or any heating appliance in which solid or liquid fuel is used shall be maintained with an approved spark rrrester as identified in the Uniform Fira Code (Standard Number 131). NON-STANDARD CONDITION(S) *ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATIVE MEASURES BLACKMON F"+ME3 PAGE 14 0,1 15 SUB/87-11.,/Wll9-52/'TR 1383S Conditio,s of Approval 12-19-88 OFFICE OF SURVEYOR LAND DEVElpPMENTIROADS SECTT023 Revised by B.O.S. *70. Rochester Avenue shaft ho 12-lS-88 constr ctiud half width to Citv of Rncho CuQariga Sta hdards for a collector road, with a 31]amum oP 26 feet of nav :tte� r on a m4s 4mu 44 feet of ri t-of-wtv. The vertical and horizontal alianmsnt shall conform to the approved Plans for the City of Rancho Cucamon a inCludin arde o riate io . th so major tra_nsitions hdlAto alei.n with .a �,tt�Ye'e�,�✓/�'rcS�filaCgrvat�* °l�`k�t�dd�'�Cal 'J.i�7d',64x�tef/ �4#�y��/�' Revised by /6t//bYttt�/'" bf�ibfdtl&t�Sl�t ! B.O.S. *71. Highland Avenue .shall be improved to standards established 12-19-88 n a deve l o men a reement etween the d eve�W—erc andCY o Ranc o;Cucamon a. Tit s ao s s o the C tY of Rancho Cucamon a.. rov ng a ra_ ursemant agreement to recover thi cost o construct n e ermanent s-tr`eet m rovements front__ eve ment as s occurs on e south szde of H hlan �nue, on terms mutua v acceptable to the C tv and the deyi�la steer. Revised by B.O.S. *72. Interim right turn deceleration and aacelerrt{on ,. for 12-19-88 westbound t.,t f c shall be constructed on the north s des or Hi hlan3 n.-enue __wni_th7 transit � s n meet''the Pamaneirt pavemelit at both 8rids tote sat s, act On a i' e Citof Ranch6 Cucamonga, 73. All retrained road and drainage improvements shall be, installed Prior to Occupancy. OFFICE �nj PL t NIUG 74. Sidewalks shall, bc provided throughout the tract, ihcluding all peripheral streets. 75. Utility lines shall be placed undEerground. in accordance 'with the requirements of Coun�y Ordinance. * NON-STANDARD CONDITION(S) **ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATIVE. MERSURES I r BLACKMON HOMES PAGE 45 of 15 SUBj$7-110/W114-52/TR 13035 Conditions of Approval 12-19-88 76. All required landschping and walls, 'As per ;he approved landscape plan, shall be ins9.alled prior to occupancy. * NON-i:TANDARD CONDITION(S} *ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATI'VT MEASURES r r� \t 1` Exhibit "C" Adak ° Condi�?ions of Approva'i Stf_aet Improvements on Rochest2R—d Highland. Avenues A. P,o.,lester Avenue }Jshall be constructed full width from Highland_ Avenue to the noilth..project boundary. The vertical and horizon`!�A alignment shall conform to the City`'s approved street plans, including appropriate transitions to align with a major arterial on the south side of Highla;id Avenue. The ceveloper shall revise the approved plans to include the east side ,of R�fiester Avenue, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, prio t to issuance of an encroachment permit. The Developer shall be eligible for full. reimbursement of actual audited costs, for constructing thosa improvements shown on the `approved street' plans for Parce? Map 9,192 (Sheet 3 and 4 of Craw;ng No. 1215) froam.,funds on deposit for the ultimaZe improvements, B. Highland Avenue shall be constructed full width (44 'feet of pavement) for the moire length of the project frontage and for 442 feet west of the centerline of the Intersection of Highland and Rochester Avenues ' with appropriate transitions to Uh existing pavement beyond those points. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of constructing the full` width permanent street improvements from future deveTt— nt as It AM occurs on the south We of Highland Avenue. C. Interim right turn deceleration and acceleration lanes for westbound traffic shall be constructed am the north side of Highland Avenue, with transitions to meet the permanent pavement at both ends, in conformance with-the, City"s arirovedrhians, The Developer shall be eligible for Mull reimburs"'�nt of actual audited costs for constructing these i'i;orovemehii�_',shown on the approved street plans for Parcel Map 9192 ($beet 17 of Drawing No. 1215) from funds on deposit for the Oti.,im Improvements. < I, { gift 1� CITY,OF RAC 1�HCl+ 37Chbt3NGt� DATE: 404 ZB, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FRON: Brad Buller, City Planner j BY; Brett Horner, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMEFrAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTA1Y1iE TAT'13351 - LEWIS res den vial su Y s on agid desigh review of 41S � coonna miniums oh 5 lots and 0 single family bits on 947 acres of land in the iiedium Density Residential District,40-14 dwelling units per acre). within the Terra �jst4 Planned Community, locatsd at the southwest corner of Terra. Vista Parkway and Milliken AGenue APR: 101-091-34. I, PROJECT STATUS, 1''h35''Jtem Was Contfnued frem the June 14 . 1989 Mee ng e o notificAV-qn received from the Chaffo join'..lJniart High School Distri "~egardfng school capacity cencerns. Presently, the Dfstrict,-= ;Ity, and Buildtng InJustry Association are meeting to address this matter, but a final agreement has not as yet been reached, Therefore;,this item should be continued. 11. REC0WAMATION; Staff recommends that tree Planning Commission con nue Ts- item to the Jely 12, 1989 meeting., f Re ul1y ted, City d B le C anne BB:8ff:ko IT.H - -t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ST NIF REPORT � ^ DATE: June 28, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Coir►.tission' FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Cindy Norris, Assistant 21z,�ner SUBJECT; OPSSEPO��,�Y FORFOR �SIGN'OUBLIC COMMENT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL An vv onmen a aria'ys s of the propesed developmert of 38 apartment un5ts ;3n 3.15 acres of land in the Medium C Residential Distri t '8-14 dwellirg units ;.per acre), i located on the rort6 side of Arrow Highway opposite Ramona f Avenue - APR.* '208-.11-03, 04, 21, 24. Associated with `I this is Tree Removai Permit 89-28, I LI. BACKGROUND: On Oune 14, 1989, the above project was heard at the regu ar y schedul�td Planning Commission meeting for the purpose of obtaining .Public input on the potential environmental effects of the propos project. The reside►t s` concerns witty :the proposel project were primarily related to the type tof project ,apartments vs. condominiums) and the possible resulting effects of ',creased crime, reduced property values, and increased trW t After hearing public testimony- *he Planning Commission found that there appeared to be a possibi,ity for r*solution in determining ti;e type of project that botiv residents and the applicant could feel comfortable with. As "esult. the lelenning Commission. requested that residents and - xhe applicant hold a second neighborhood meeting to further discuss *:,heir concerns, and that the public hearing be continued to June 28, 1989. II. ANALYSIS: The„eighborhood meeting was held on June 19, 1989, and approx mataly 25 people attended There were three significant issues di,cussed at the meeting. lj Condoniniums vs. apartments - Residents expressed a general prete`rence of r a for sate conderninium project, as opposed to / Mental apartments. Condominiums were felt to be :more beneficial to the neighborhood because of a perceived increase j in stability, pride of ownership, and' better property maintenance. Residents expressed :c.nceirns that apartments are aye PLANNING COWISS1014 S `f Ri�Y�R UNIVERSAL PROPERTIES •.'gR 88,17 June 28, t-989 Page 2 generally associated.with a transient popillation, Iack of property iiaintenance, and increased crime. The applicant, Mr. <_• Liao, has'°indicatee that he will build condominium units to r' kllRviate the residents' concerns~ It was noted a?-,thM°June 14th P7anni.ia Commission, hearing and again at tfie recent neighborhood ' eeing that the applicant would,.reed to file,,nn aprificaticn nor a "tentative,, tract map 4'�ar condominium purposes.." ?} Traffic. - Residents have expressed a concern with increased rtra is on Arroll--Mute and tuild litre to see a traffic signal - — iastalled+-at itto A"Gw & Ramona intersection, The ins;;�?ation of a traffic signal is based upon the - occurance of "t4gnal warrant". There are elpven possible warrants which include such measuremenks` as traffic volume, delay time, pedestrian access . :,Ind accident; .experience. Currently the ;iequire1 warrens; do not exist at this location. Fhb traffic divisitn of the City has indicated that this project will not cause the traffic r!arr,iits necessary to req6�re a signal, further, the future improvement of Arrw Route, includirlq widering of the sg4th side and the installation of a s;,gnat lfight at. Hisrmosa Avisnue,, will enhancethe traffic.flow on Arrow Highway. 3. Coneentratiotr of density ; vRe dents have'-expressed' concert with regard > the_ concentration? -higher densit;7 in the imnediaye area along Arrow Route. The G-enxrcal flan designation currently all" Medium Fte`ideotial {8-14 dwelling units per acre) cn the north side big" Arrow between Archibaldand iiermoo-- Avenuiss. ReC4FiESi0ATIS? Staff recommends that the Planning Co, ission t. con3uct a, ublic Hearing to` receive ingit on 01ttntial environmental effects of the project, review issues raised ev the neighborhood meeting and the issues ids r .it`d in the Ifittlal Study Part 11. After review .nf the inWrmation the Planning Commission may require a focused bl on point$'raisad as a res�t`t of anal,tsis and public input or cause a negative declaration to be Y, prepared to be acted on with the project;, 1, 1, PLANNING commISSYa �`rw REPaRT > i !UNIVERSAL PRQPERTIE- DR 81841 r7une 28�, 1989 " Page 3 { X Respe y submitted, ZI Bra City,rlanner 98:G4:js Attachment$: Exhibit "A"--Staff Report frtmi June 14, 1* ;c r, } j, a j r i Ir CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON'GA ; STAFF, REPORT •i DAT E: June.14, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Comieission FROM: Plainer BY: Cindy.,Morris, AI sistant Planner I. SUBJECT:, OPPORTUN'7 FOR PUBLIC C OMNEFr ON THE ENVIRONMENTAI. 7i '�'�rit`F6a s7 -,Uffrw.iSC`PRl7 o - An ,nv ronp.)-a a ana ys s or tne propose ue've]Zo n o 38 apartmo units on 3.15 acres of land,in the Nediva Residentti !"District' (8-14 &0ling.•Units_ 'per i,ere), '.ocated on. t!Ve north side of Arrow K4-hway opposite Ramona Avenue -�iPN: 208-311-03, Off, 21, & 24. Associated with this is ;tee Removal Permit 89-28. I, PRdJECT A40 SIT': DESCRIPTION: A. Action Request2d: Recommndation For:ireparation of focused env ronmen a mpact Report. B. Protect Donsity .n2.06`dwelling units per acre. k;.. Surrounding Land Usa and Zoning: North - Si ngl a family hones, Low^ Alt; Residential (2-4 j rf Piling units per acre). South - Single family homes, Lott Density.Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre). East - A church facility, M2ditLi Density Residtntial C8-14 dwelling units per acre. West - Older singlE family hcx-, Medium Density Residential (9-14-dwellirig units per. Xre). D. General Plan Designations: Prejact Site Medium Density Residential ,(8-14 welling units per acre) Nor`ch - Low, Dearity Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - Loa Rensity Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Medium Density Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acres Went - Meth m density Residential (8-14 dwelling units.per aure) PLANNING �ryt� rss,`.� RF,kurfON C1k ENV.''ASSESa� OR 88-17 »'UNIVERSAL. PROERTIES June 14,1989 Page 2link 1} F E. Site �lharacteriatics; lire'project site is currently developed wi o er, -single family hones plus several rccessory r` structures.' 1hi's site flas an approximate slope of'.3 from north to south and numerous,mature trees,. To the east is the Church of the .Nazarene; to the north, existing, Fani tor, structure3; to the south, Arrow Route and single familr,homesi to the west, older,single family homes in some disrepairi;: `end northwest, the., Sible , Missionary Church property. II. ENVIRONMENTAL- REVIEW PRCCGSS: Under the provis?j­tis 'oi the a orn a nvrronr!en a�i-'duality Act iCEQA), the City must determi:nc if tiffs proposed. protect may have a signifycant effect on the envir 1, nr-� If the `City determines 'that there i3 substantial 'eviL'ler,re` that ar$ aspect,of the project, .ether individually or�%;4'1a`cive7y, may cause t significant efi•ect on the environme t, 'then an Enviroeowital impact Report (EIR) must be prepared. If the City`determines, that these will not be a significant effect., then a-41egative aec)aratlon<;(Neg. Deer.) shall be prepared. _ The'aDi.'icant may mdif# their project to include mitigation measures in the>design. 1 CEQA defines .'signif cant effect' as "a substantial adverse change in the physical conditions:which exist in the area affected byjh!� proposed prOect". Determini'?.,g whether a .,project may have a significant effect plays a critical role in' the CEQA process. This determination calls for careful judgment, basetl to the extent poscible,on scientific and factual data. The City must consider public opinion tertainfng whether a specific effect will be adverse or beneficial. Generally speakingff"'Sf there is a substantial bacyy opinion that tonsidr efft�as�advsrse the Csmnission rare, regain the effect as adverse and pr�i&are an E1% CEpA establ),it)es criteria for making the determindtfoq of significant effect'," Project impacts am juelopi; significant based on the context and degree of change ,in tine ow, we of the fol l wing: „ Public heal l'and safety of the zowunity: Controversi&l effects on tJ'-,e human environment; Wolstion of fedeial,,stats?, local, or health and safety laws; Requirement for a formal institutional-level response. PLANNIM COMM. .F RESOLUTION NO. ENV. ASSESS. - OR 88•17 « UNIVEnAL PROPERTIES June 14, 1989 Page 3 Ask 111." ANALYSIS: The following is a summary discussion of those items which were identified as areas of concern by .Staff through review of the Environmental Assessment Part: II, which has been attached for revi ertr A. Soils _and Geology: This pro�lect falls within the San ernar no County- it Leos Goss Control District. Mitigation z A Soil Disturbavr.e Permit will be required. B. Kydrolog,y As a result of the O%oposed project there will proprooU3517 be some changgs in absorption rates, drainage patterds or rate and ahiount of surface aunoff, mitigation: on-site landscaping will allow absorption to continue sand day increased runoff,will be conveyed from Id e site in Improved drait+ago devices to existing stom drain facilities. C. Air Quality: There will be an indirect impact on air quality as a rem oP the project generating trallftc. Mtiga-t-i_on: An indivic l pvject rnnot mitigate air quaifivy mp ac'rs as vehicle emission controls are the responsibility of I the Federal and State governments See Statement of ` Overriding Considerations tne'iuded as part of the Master Assessment and General Plan Erviromental Impact Report (Exhi bit`'A). D. 8iota-Flora: There will be a number of trees removed as a resu r, o e proposed project. Mitigation: Based upon an arborist's report by Paul Chasm, ase"Treas which are designated as "heritage Trees% according to the City's Tro Preservation Ortiinance, a�4 are in good healtk are recommended to either be preserved in place or relocated elsewhere on site(Exhibit B). ii E. �;opulatton and Land Use Pranninq Considerations; As a result or Me proposea project,' anti y in drea will be increased. In addition, the proposal will alter the present land use. PLANNING CONMISS. 4 RESOLUTION NO." ENV.' ASSESS.' - DR'88-17 - UNIVERSAL PROPERTIES June 14, 1989 Page 4 Mitigation: The proposal is'•cors ttent with the planned land use and aensiries for the area which is Medium R:�sidenti0 (8- 14 dwelling units per acre) as designated by the General Plan and Development Districts Map (Exhibit Cl. F. Soco-Economic: The impact of, the 'construction of mil'ti- family our ng upin sur,,oundfng single family, neigpti,�:4ubds, part?culariy tax rates and,,property values, is unknowy. Mitigation., Fur ler review and analysis.of tLese impacts is needed and should be addressed in at; Environmental' Itapact Report. G. Transportation: Traffic levels as a re pill: of this project w-ill e� yely ,4inor in cors��ri son tiAth levels predicted -an Arrow Route as a whore and in fact, have bean included into the total projected traffic figure,of 45,000 vehicles trips per day. Mitigations As Arrow Route is a .significant east-crest, PT-air a7-:which >traver<se4 through several ,jurisdictional boundariEs, th6 street will be-designed to,carry the projected AWL traffic lord at an adequate -level of ser0ce which will miiwgate the proposed traffic concerns. H. Cultural'. The extstins'Croswell •house, located at-98y4 Arrow au s. currently on the' Historic list as "s� veyed, endetermined-#atus". 11 Mitigation: Consistent with the Historic Preiejtvation oL wissIon s recommendatlon, the hjAs'a has -been it�ce orated into the design of the project site and could, pote��tially receive a`designation at serue later datr34 a I. Healih Safety and Nulsane Factors 1. Stress. .Staff has received two (2) petitions with a total off" YI Z�rAgnatures re'qutsting that a "stress level. report" be prepared to analyzz'�the'traffic effects err physical and mental health. (Exhi 'f t Dl,. Mitigation: Further study is necessary &a to substantial p0lic controversy concerning potential adverse impacts. Regr,4re an Environmental rmpact Report. h, i }I PLANNING,SOMNISSi..d fI RESOLUTIOw�0. ENV. ASSESS.. DR 88-17 - UNIVERSAL PRMERTIES June 14, 1989 Page 5 2,, Crim'e: Rasidents have alsf) expressed concerns regarding a p�45zial, Incrvase 'in crime in the general area. iRiii atibn: A stat',stical analysis, crynducted with 'the e p of e Sheriff's Department, indicates that generally incidents of crime tend to increa:s�'& with SIlperea;5ing density although other factors gay also be re: �ed,,.,such as, unit management and ease of opportunity and char after or the area, (i eX age of units, socio-ecoromiz status). The evidence is incor-clusive Oat an increase in dens'ity: 1 is the most Important.fr-ictor contributing to increases in' crime or that incidents of crime in multi-famfTy aeons are primarily drug related. Require an EnwirqpntaT`Impact Report. 3 Noise: The proposed project would have a direct effect in generating noise by-'.tonstruction- activity. In addition!: residents,of the proposal would be subject to traffic 1 related noise°impacts frow Arrow n5ute.s; Miti an proxisTon,. I!-acts will be mitigated through required uns .i.n the City's Development Code which limits the 4! times of construction activity and by the construction of a sound 'barrier, of at least 7 feet in hilgttf,,for patios exposed,to Arrow Route. J. Public Services and Utilities f 1. Police: 'flee San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department Tasts manpower needs on past :City, growth and fuh:ure projections. M tl ation There should be adequate manpr,.ter to 'handle nci— ► rowtis ofs8 dwe$ !ling units. 2. Schools: Project will impact the ChaPfey high Joint' aroo District. Mit_tigation: Further study is requited to determine the eve o mpact on tha school district as a result of.t'Nis project necessary tr!,tigation. ReVre an Environmental Impact Report. +y. RECOMMENDATION: ' Staff rocom3tend5 that the Commission conduct a puublicTar7—rig to receip;e input on the potential environmental effects of thO .project. n*e Commission may consider the petition as public controversy and require a focused EIR on the .points: = raised by the petition as identified in the Initial Study. PLANNING OOWSS,v,i,RESOLLITION Nei;f Q ENV. ASSESS• w OR 88-117 Qf{IVERSAL'PROPERTTES ` June 14, 1989 Page 6 Ask r4-A ReS idly s ta ... d $ r Cl t ner 86:CN:sp Attachments: Exhibit W -.Statement of OVerriding Consideration Exhibit 180 Tree Identification tap. , Exhibit "&` Development'District lta r Exhibit "D" Petitions Exhibit " ":: ! c-atfiart of Petition Sigy�er Exhibit '.F" --Reporting-Dis;trtct map Exhibit '160 - Surveyed tteporting $}Utrict and Pro4ec r �.00`1LitJn5. f1 Exhibit >rN" lni i ijl study Part"it Resps"Is+ex Exhibit "I" r Site Pt an ti t7 i , c E. I C/ EXEiIBIT uiF2e i STATkML`t!T nL' QVCi2f iQ7i74 CONSTOKnATIt)iiS The final Envircnm � al'. �� Impact Report .anti. Kr'-"er Environmental A&sa:JStquttt,\ 61Atntfflea certain impacts wii,ich. cannot feadIbIV to avaUiia&, by mitigation Measures. Those # :mPact cons#st of u gpmulative contribution to tht. pf tiettr;adatxo i nt aiir ,c111414 t}% a sOefUlt of #Tacreased Populatian. comianrctal an(' itrdlstrlal g-rotrth, ' The growth, - while na.t'directiy czt►tsect icy titan, Ceneral Plan, Is' than effect of development projt:cts 'Llinplem6ated, through the pJ*y #* pollci s.' notwlthttt°aandj4 tUs �bs`pa,*t,, LISe project W�tSI apprave4 based uitat Lila fi`nrlin that: ,upoctt a economic and r social cons .deeatiot:u q`aka #nfeaagible ally project alternatives nPecif#ed n '`�MQ final Rnvironmental Impact Report and Master Uvironeafttal Assessment atld, accordingly canStituteS end ouerridilj j� asls for �r ro;, l4ct epprmval» Those eanzIdrrrat3ona sr& tttat tint 4epc P r+i,n s verse � Update i t i velo a measxtr;: to mitir�atc otcnt#al a<dveraa imparts of de elapnOnt a�, tile{,;-0xistIng community which would Otherwise occur writhoat 4,,0i-;antzecl Witt .cbmpr hanalVo approach t- future development. urger Qi tneral Plar. Technical 'ppdata includea current uLatisticul #�ito=mal.fort on the community and .ref.jects changeaa i n du omrlop;aenr�pol citta as well an aetabl ll-_4i axyilcAuxt llluOrhuratad itt tite ttonerul Flan. at its adbptiou {ts 1984, elite Goneral" Plan Provides. Apprepriitto guidance for 1:1 so. establIvIamesat of Zoning anti" deve3C'opP*k-nt re!�ulations to ntitiouto Grot'th induced - Ampacts.Coia�vequerat)y, ho 2ac ssfptit n �f tiro Qranesffil i'3arc "Vachnica.ipdate will result .in poteittia2 environmental effect a s that t< sauivofr;ntis Yly 1*uu 33linifitlAOt in Scope than would`-occur without �F.anerm:, i%brn qu dance, includInC- oath alternative analysa. .An the Final Mituter Lnvironmontal ltat�assmant envir©sOGntal TnPuct Report;. end Alk 1 STATEMENT 6F *VOIRIQB G Co 3 ►Tt t co G) a m Qx R5 n± cw TL ,E CL cu •04 i ' a I ) Mbor,btYaDmrv �spreaTv`n� �y�laeaj `✓Arber,!,r ne�unme+xb reluuFicrt }c F+esrrug Ar6rib1 rrco„nmerelS remaur D NORTH TrteS rct 5ubjQc f In prcjmji cr pp,011d . l y, CITY Or ITEM 7REE IDENTIFICATION MAP PI N I G DIVISION :'---�` EXHIBIT: SCALE; US ..V�.mosomCp if on L y meMilt Ssa x �_ ■■Gfii i� r 1 tstRig rz cl MUSEUM IMIL Y Chi` ITIM: RANCHO "FuI I°'Esr .c Iff UMTMCT MAP _ a , pa,the undo'roped.As.Friii ha rose affsirrd by zb►]lntvara:l Rropsrttae praPasal to tuxid - 4Pei't:,;aka as rtt tarth aids of A.",Aauta tetvaen 4rahxia;4 cnd HaKmgse hotehy patitia;.fat tna 1011 414, Yt"+regcaac a b#P4YC$4an EnvfYoareaka;iipatd�aparC.aigna vxih a$tress LiNvoT 8npntt,. atd.hov trafk.�itrata atracta our sestet and Phynitai naeteb, Futtnaranro,.-4 rsgsseat,the city to ` ;tmida olita krill 2apprt4{iYPes of xtimea raperSsdr tat CgnvitUCnsi.and etaq ttsa atatkscits on ttiaa-ffC-t1t is calatiah tm epektlabta in thet Frrprr Aayce ores. k valid EvmTaari¢R.:{iapatt by expsrt4 as 0-tffatca of a n4irnborbavd-het dra`dr;aiaca and uaarr yathst"Sn high nu.. t ILL. Adh asafi area,actin rut this area Det-ean Archibald and'Waranal.At,$Affect e4:oroperky vat. + hoes. ` a-nses.and the drain at isle ontorcasant, DisiTnlX,tre,nPees of any slPtcad offiral or 4PPOA0 Parwp or Parsaaa ktq etY profit ip 4ny";fras tgkldinl�eayehara in GnahS Catsaoags ky Pro3uet or car•'p+ As tho.peoPia most directly affected ilk viah to sea our tax mortay f1�,accltn in the for; �..> of sO&Ort froa dAr mayar,a-Y Cauntil.uil ata4te3.officals,the Motto Cwwtizsiw.so4 the FU611c°.fat toswiasion. Y .r..«.t s � .� .•� , s Y r o J , -14 17 jr •'t f ` rr F ,, . ri r +. r r #i d sr7i• a r. Plosse Send Ak oat;f$cacion 41 the Planning.Dapsrtment.l;nose a>mckps For ltntversnt Proo� ,VcPQs0 Ptojett an the north side of Arrov Route, *"IKKJ A Alk r1 a Vs. the undarslgned.vho will be rust affected by the ga''prsai PxoprPus Propoabt:o'tutid apettsanss yn the reach lids of Arrow douta between 4rU+ibald-ndd.k[arapsg,tt;lFaby pat"10 for the fcllovingt '(a rettuaat a bipsrtissa yA literal IePrt t,arson along a.:s}4 Wage Ls1.k"4Pott. + and how troffit etram sffactg Cur metal snd'pbyaicdi haiith^ :Futthnxao we rsg4t5t>thi city to c provide polite crime t4Patts.(typat of trims reported.Act conaictions),a, also the statistics en ctise growth in relation to spsrtmata in tit AM"stouts area' A vsl�d Eveputton Report by ✓esperts an the affects of a ceighPortuwd'what drub dsslars ssd.yeas Asthar in high numbers 1n s sell area,``euch.as this area bstwaen Atthibald t:d Aersoss,i'9'A afgsAt cc-Ptorr�trcy vslusa.hiss+ nwnsr"a,and"ps drain on ism enfbxtemnt, 9isalosurs�oases 4f nny-slatted offt al ar aapoint Person.or W443 vho my profit in acyway ttca building anywbate in ganeha Cutamogs by Pradu asrwics; Mahe People east directly Wetted we wish to see oVr tax Octal,to$Ctic,in the f gqKt fxaa our mayor,.city Coungil,all netted offtcalsl'the pleall�-)Comiaeten,lanG the of sup p public Safne Ctmeissian. ....rH r rid r— ^ 73 4�yy .. f • ♦tom. fr 's.kr. W. A C n e 8 . .t �*✓• �\ •v � 1r pleaso send me nntttlrhtfnn of-the pmnontnR nepaseteenirf`s next`scettng per a kit sidu ut irruw Koutc."'' . �',�. � rursdl prujiorttor Proposed pra,tAc:un U`e nut u, .Coordinator ' .ts➢a#vernal PKo Plcnoi��?Jepari�mc ,. Raneho rurarunge _ + "Jesea and se notificat,ton of the'Plannina Wpartaent's next ee?ting pa-1'riversa?#rrrerti� - propd�}$.project�z*the norrhrwidn 6f drteu&aucp._I as apppsed co the DuildEng of sny cype,af rent4- At as thta.traK 14 intiadated with rentals a".'sw18'�, f would be pleased to see a Park,,<� ' said 1�� Uai;Tie with the inter s1rit,- a Cindy 1/,rtis(dated Yszeb.9, 1994)by K.CuiilEo and' pe::d:3an mCzzz:,: Hy am*and addraar,':i3ste4 Deaty or attached. ThAnk fcu. —` NAME -.51A t AWR 'e,•• + Cm-: ZIP FHOVE F .CAT -r-��. .�'. `�,4 cI"%r;�+ E'�'L�:ut ,(u. ry?', '.• " .,�1ro k', o ea +fi a�tu �f ' .�_ 123o tf�!'7.1A;/r a" 1rr iZ", !Alfa 2AI !? 17V7: rnc�. <lEE IYA J 5+s �dc 9, x9J ,rv� a.7`� gs6rs 1e'rt4ttf y�. �C„� �i'Tso ram'-'�Y¢z j; i S� f1 " Cindy Norris March 8, 1989 City of Rancho Cucamonga iroject Coordinator - Universal Properties AMIL Arrow Route Apartments Dear Cindy+ r` With regard to our. recent telephone conversation about the proposed units on the north side of Arrow Route per Universal Properties. This project will have it's greatest effect on.homeowner's on the sdwih side of Arrow, the;: spread through the community with related Effects. I have spoken to'many homwowner's who are opposed to this project. There is a growing drug problea especially on Arrow Route because of the availability of apartment type housing which attracts transient's and drug dealers. Many drug,dealers can afford very high rent as they are sup plemented by their victims, drug addicts'L These.drug addicts steal and rob in order to support their addiction and recruit innocent children into their: world. There is a_terrib:le drug problem in this area. t have spoken with law enforcement people:who agree that apartments are the biggest problem. You rust change zoning laws or you are enabling drug dealers to flourish along with related crimes, and pro4lews-aa4, as Lhe Mean-down of the family structure. You are either fighting the drug dealers :or helping them! There is noin-betweenl There is much smog in this area and street] are handling three times their capacity level4L Before anyone thinks about building apartments, we would like said buildf:r to provide a bipartisan Environmental Impact Report along with a Stress Level Report, and how traffic stress affects our mental and physical health. We would like the city to provide. police Crime Reports, types of .rimer reported, not convictions, and also statist%-',;: 00 crime growth in relation to apartments in the Arrow Route area. If progress must march on we would like to see the type -Di housing built that one must purchase individually. This type of person tends to contribute to the community and is not a parasite. We want to see otv- tax ".ie.+aey in action. We want to see the-city of Rancho Cucamonga stand behind i.'a citizens. It's not important what color the stucco is on these apartments er what kind of, gate they put up. This will not curb drug dealing in this „tea. Re-zoning to prevent drug haveW s.is the only answer. No one can stop progress, but progress should be regulated with regard to environc._=al capacity, impact, and stress level as it__relates to mental and physical health. If you drive under, the ifiLwence of alcohol,you, according to the law, are responsible for your actions. If you vote for or allow these apartments to be built under the influence of misguided loyalty you are responsible for toe-outcoule. It cuuid ue tha killing uf"•!. police yf£icer zryin&-t0.-_P,&SaS� :..� . .- his duty,or the overdose of a child, or maybe wakla3 up to see a drug :,crazed killer in your bedroom. Without apartments drug dealers cannot live in your neighborhood in such great numbers. You have seen neighborhoods on the news when people are fight- ing to take back their streets from cocaine -- crack dealers, heroin addicts, and related crimes they create. You say it can't happen here. If you as elected 'offic,`als join us in this fight, it won't happen here! How many drug related crimeA occurred on Arrou Route between Archibald and Hermosa (previ- ously Turner) uefore apartments were built? How many drug related crimes occur after the apartments? More people, you say, per population. That just ` doesn't wash! i Sincerely, rch el Cutillo - RESIDENT LETTEF P.S. Every home"ner`should bA 'notified by mail of al:, formal & informal. `4 i a 3 jS 3tS iS iswl , 2 S 3 lya 2 u t •a �- .ii Q.rBa� " , a I. M 3 C • 2° tCi Y 2'a nC ; • • ,.s � a � 'to pa. a ���•- ,.�,,�: � m i ° SUBJEC ARRo J7� ..rent .� {i—t. •� -�_� Gt`� �] _��i `. a "m�. [�^.:t • •qn� .� � X ,r y,�'�'t A'•� f zyX �.�. � :�, Al9 w21 n !`�' ® - %ogrb F S ..'!( tea_' 4 n sau '"AUs IA 5J AM 15:+Lsti�.e'=s'tRta fi.'►y�i-,' • t X*' �1"aC �� : r i{WI 3MU N. t t y ,r:tom.• ] 1 S s—:.=' a '-:a� to a,+'i%§�6"fit st�'4F�'�i�••s`s`;`�� ' �=' 1 s -dww®--••s��o • ••�•••:•®:o••®•�•••ss••®••••••••t Original Poor Quality X LOCATKMd Cr RESMTs SMM PETMON - LOCATION OF RESIDENTS SMWM PETMON& ®■ - PEIMLIC HFA� dOT ATION BOUNDARY NOW � r I' �`'("� �7�d 4�5� GA M"ON ° LocAT"t�f PETt�ft13N S,GFIERS FLANNING DI �A -� III`:.. o SCALE..�,.�_ a a c ea a im Cat M S;1 CY n n';®3 G ® O •el P1 Q O C rl O O �, QCCCG:7G ri'. ® o i •V •a` ko Pi p �� �fL" .thy •�'.�' C3' Cs = C� C i►•t Fy eN M t` +R1 � �r'4 iGtiatb fA3 to ffi •+ �"• aa�'GaitC4W ri E-4 q N N t3 t5 �i to rl co %c N tHlV .Y 8' C N N O C tgll� 0 M a • • o • .. e 9-4 iCIA ca M"O�J co Ncn i ►•v.J p O O � � �, s+E� T Q•a � Q A L. iV - Id. _ O IT AOL O in . C �Yiddtl'! O � N C v5 c w » N .• i v o r • ■®e _ NA s Tw lu f � -� �. '� far_. ''��c�'s' ^� •ems ZMA ct s 4U,— a� A � CITY" OF ITEM: CITY OF RANCHO CPC1,;i0\'Ga 111 PART II - INITIAL S MY E`'CIHOtiIeNTAL CHMC;{:,IST. 'I DATE (,I G APP"..ZC.4:.'s S �y1A fc rc Li rs e . FIL.;C DATE: � S _ LOG NUMBER: -8 l'1 PROJECT: 33 PROJECTLOCATIOX:-, y16 dv ,&r Z V. E I30 NENTAL IMPACTS _� (Explarition of all "yes" and "maybe" aaswaTY are required an attached sheets). YES M!AYpE NO 1. Soils and Geology. Will the proposal have signiacant results in: a. unstable grpl'ird conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? b. Disruptions, displacements, cnapaction or burial of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface contour intervals? d. The destrssction, covering or modification. of any unique geologic or physical featurmjs? e. Any potential increase in wind or water erasion of' soils, affecting either on or off Ito conditons? f� Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? Vol g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? h. An increase in the rate of extraction and/or use of any mineral resource? 2. �r91a v, Will the proposal have significant r1sulcs in: G YES 'L4Y3- Noo a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of flowing streams, riiers, ar, ep`ne_er;i1 stream chanttls? ✓ b, Change>4 in absorption rates, drainage patterns, cr the rate and amount of surface pacer runoff? �. c,. Alterations to the course or floe;of flood waters? . d. Change in the.'amounc of surface eater in anyi body of vtter?' e. Discharge into surfacei,aters, or any alteration of surface water quality? tom' f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? of C S. Change in the quantity of gtoundwaters, either through direct additions 0r with— drawals, or-through interference with au aquifer? Quality? Quantity? h. The reduction in the aaount of water other- wise available for p,.olic water supplies7 I. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such''pas £loodins or seinhes? 3. Air Quality,. Will the prop"sal hzeve significant results in a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile or indirect sources? Stationary sources?'' b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and/or Interference with the attainment of applicable' air quality standards? c. V teration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? r 4. Biota L Flora. Will the proposal have significant results lac I a. Change in t;1e characteristics of species, Includingdiversity, cy, distr_but:an, .sr number Of z an sp ecies Y Es R , o£ plant zz b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species ref plants? Faze YES xwn W 1113 c. Introduction of new or d-sruptive species of Plants into an area? + d, Reduceicn ir; the potentiaz for agricultural Production, sr.i. 'Will the proposal have s tnisicant results in: i d _ a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, .distribucion, or numbers of any species of animals? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered SpeCieS of animals? { c, Introduction of new or disruptive species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier , to the migr;acio\ or movement of an_„al.s? d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or wildlife habitat? 5. Poaulation, Will the proposal have °signifieAnt results in: , a, Will the proposal alter the location, distri ., bu s, density, diversity, or growth rate the u:an population of an area? i b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 6. Socio-Economic Factors, Will the proposal have significant results A.U. a. Chang# in local or regional socio-econamic, chmracttrisgics, ic►cludiaj, economic or cc=arcial diversity., tax rate, and property, ' valued b. Will project coats be equitably distributed among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tax Payars or project users.? t/ 7. Land Use and Plannine considerations. Will the proposal have significant results in? a. A substantial alteration of the present or planned Idnd use of an area? b.. A conflict with arty designations, objectives, policies, or adapted plans of any governmental enti.ie*,? c. An ixpaat upon the qulaity or quantity of existing cons=pt*ve or non-consumptive recreational opportunities? [Aftk YES MMBZ `ta $, Trannsaortation, Will the proposal have signif cant results in. a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? h, c",f_ec'ts on existing streets, or demand for new street construction? c. Ufeots on existing parking facilities, or .., demand for new parking? � d. Substantial impact upon existing transporta- tion systems? e. ;4lterations to present patterns of circula ti= of movement of people And/or-goods? yam" £: 6Tterations to or effects on present and ' potential water-borne, rail, mass transit or air traffic? ' S. Increases in traffic hazar4s to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedssttians? 9, Cultural Resw2rces. Will the proposal have signi!icant results in: . a, A dist4rbance to tho integrity of archaeological, paleontological, and/or historical resources? 10. Health. Safetv, and Nuisance'Faetots. Will this proposal have significant resulra in: a. Creation of 4ny health hazard or potential health ,o+ hazard? b. Exposure of people to potential health t:Q;,prslss". j c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous xUb:tance;s in the ctant of an accident? 10' d, An tncresse in the number of individuals j or spec,as9 of v.tctor or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organises? .,..., -..-.. e. increase in existing noise levels? U." � f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous w,.r noise levels' 1 ,r I $. The creation of objectionable odors" v . I h. An increase in light or glare? i'ff -?age YES �!aYBE NO 11, Aesthetics,. Will the proposal i.ve significant results in: a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic vista or view? b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site? c. A conflict with th-,objective of designated or potential scenic-'corridors? 12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal have a significant need for new systems, or alterations to the following: a. Electric power? ✓ b. N.4tural or packaged gas? s/ c. Communicatigns systems? d. Wster supply? y*'" e. Wastewater facilities?' f. Flood control structures? S. Solid waste facil=ties? h. Fire protection." i. Poliae protection? J. Schools? k. Parka on other recreational, facilities? I. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads and flood control facilities? ✓_ m. Other governmental services? 13. Enerty and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy. C. An increase in the demand far development of �- new sources of energ'j?—�-- V _ d. An increase or perpetuation of the consumption of non-renewable forts of energy, when feasible = r� renewable sources of enerrr are available? .�r <i YzgkYs�b' S0 e. Substantial depletion ,,`anv nonrenewable or t scarce natural resour=_� 14. Mandatory Findings' ❑f sicz~ifieance. a. Does tie project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife Population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or.:animal:co=un,:.CV,;raduce > the number or restrict the range of rate or' endangered plant or animal or eliminate mportaav examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential tb,achieve short-term, to the disadvantagl� of Xong-term.` environmental goals? (A shot-term impact;vn the environment is one whinh occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time,while long- te= impacts will endure well into the future). c, Does the project have impacts which are Individually ignited. but cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerable means that the incremental effects of an individual pr41-0 t are considerable whan viewedjl In connection with the effects of past projectsly and probable-,future projects). ✓" d. Dots the project have enviro=ental effects which will cause :substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? ✓' IT. DISCUSSION OF SNt'Yd0'.MiTAL EVALUATION (i.e.. of affirmative answers to the above quesoiotia plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures). I 1t j 41 IIl. DRTS 1N'ATI0Y In the basis of this initial evaluation: i I .`in d the proposed project COLD ltoT have a 'si�ni:idant effect t on the environment, and a SEEGATI'M DECLARATION Frill be pretared.. <^,) I find that althou h the ro osea a 3 P P Project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A �tEGAT2: DECLARATIO4 WILL BE PREPARED. ' I find the proposed project ..SAY have a significant effect on the envirnmeut, and an MULONZI ENT I*IPACT REPORT is required. ' �f"�=1% Date .,c � r1�1 a'�! ` I� �=? Sianaaure r Title lj ;i` t' ADC3EENDUK TQ INITIAL STUDY PART II 1I. DISCUSSION CF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (i.e., of affirmative answers to the questions in the Initial Study Part 1I, plus a df aussion of proposed mitigation meauures) 1. Soils and i:eology le Maybe.. This project falls within the San Bernardino County Soil Erosion Control District Area and a Soil Disturbance Permit will be required. 2. Hydrology. 2b Maybe. ' The site is primhrily undeveloped; hence, construction of buildings and other ir.�ervious surfaces will result in changes in absorption retea, drainage patterns or rate and amount of surface;-�n�ff. There will be significant areas of landscaping';a-site to allow absorption to continue. Any increased run-off w.11 be conveyed from the site in improved drainage devices to existing,storm drain facilities. 3. Air Quality. 3.a,b Yes,. . Construction activity will have primary effect in constant or periodic air emissions from construction equibment; and vehicles. The project will have an �ni"-' ,ct impact upon air quality through construction of '.multi family dwelling units which will generate 232 v;hfale trips per day, An individual development project -annot mitigate air quality impacts because vehicle emissfen controls are the responsibility of the federal and state governments: See Statement of Overriding Considerations which is Exhibit A in the General Plan E►lvfironmental Impact Report. (Exhibit Al 4. 9iota--Flora. 4.b Yes, Arborist report was prepared pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance No. 276. lire site contains numerous mature trees which are defined as "!heritage Trees" by the Tree Prey:ev) tion Ordinance and protected :fit thereby. Of those subje,,.v to the Tree Preservation Ordinance, staff has madf the following recommendations based upon the arborist's report prepared by Paul Chaney -which was completed on May 12,,1989. (See Exhibit 9). U Part It Page 2 4 TABLE TREE I.D. SPECIES COOOTS 5,6,7 Canary Island Date Palm Preserve in place by designing grading accordingly. 0,3 Canary Island Bate Palm Transplant elsewhere along street frontage to save. 10,11 Cedar** Preserve in place. May require shifting the driveway to save tree 14 Pottlebrush Preserve in place by designing grading accordingly. 14.1 Cedar** Preserve in place bqy designing grading accordingly. is Crape IVrtle Preserve in place by adjusting proposed private, patio and da;,igning grading accordingly. 16 Canary island Gate Paler Transplant elsewhere on Site.'* 16. Olt-ve Transplant elsewhere on site.* l 22 Crape !Myrtle Transplant elsewhere on site.'* 31.1 Bay 'leaf or Grecian Laurel Transplant elsewhere on site.* l 37 Cedars Most significant tree on property. Preserve in place by eliminating any building within 20 feet of trunk. *NOTE: Trees could only be preserved in place if project, (site plan) was significantly altered, j "NOTE: These trees are not suitable for transplanting; hence, can only be preserved in place, , I 5. Popuion, 5a Maybe. As a result of the proposed project, the demsity in thrs, area will be increased. The proposed project density is, twice'x that of the since family neighborhoods to the nortf and south, and comparable to the ex sting apartarents to' the east. Part II Page 3 ;t However, the increase is consistent with density ranges allowed by the current General Plan and Development 7istrict designations of Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre). `fie General Plan encourages a varied mix of housing types and locations to help,diversify the population and mix and meet the housing needs of the entire community as required by the State, 6 Social-Economic Factors. 6a Maybe. The surrounding neighborhood includes a diverse mix of single family tract housing, apartments, commercial and a church. To the west are many larger parcels zoned for multi- family residential use that have been only partially developed with older single family re idencex. The condition if the housing f-n the area also varies greatly, with the tract homes generally being in good repair. The_imoact of the construction of multi-family housing upon surrounding single family neighborhoods, particularly tax rates and pir-perty values, is unknown; therefore, an Environment& Impact Report should be required, 7. 6and Use and planning Considerations.. 7a Yes. The proposal will substantially alter the present land use of larger lot single family residential located on the north side of Arrow 11oute. 'the proposal is consistent with the planned land use for the area, which is Medium Residential (8- 14 dwelling units per acre) as deairgomd by the General Plan and Development District Map. (EtIbIt C), 8. Transportation. 8a,b,d,g ftybe. Based upon land use designations in the General Plan, Arrow Route is e--acted at build-out to carry 0,000 vehicle trips per day (VW For that reason, access- to Arrow Route is lim4ted, and as a designated sajcr arterial `will have an ultimate right-of-Kay of 100 feet (72 feet of pavement). 45,000 VPD is at �:e upper range of the capacity at which a four (4) lane highway can handle at a service level "D". The applicant shell be required to dadicate an additional 50 feet of right-of-way for Arrow Route and add street lights.' }iowever, widening of the north side r' Arrow Route was completed through the City`s capital improvement program in 1988. Widening for the south side of Arrow Route is anticipated during the 1989-9G Fiscal Year as part of "he o- City s capital improvement pNgrara which would precede or coincide with the construction of the proposed project. r Part T1 Page 4 To reduce potential hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or Pedestrians, access to Arrow 'Route shall be limited and the propos/zi driveway location aligned with Ramona Avenue. In addition,-type and height of landscaping gill be restricted on either side of the driveway to ensure adequate line of 'sight visibility. Sign3lization of the intersection at Ramona Avenue may occur at some future date,•however, will depend upon the voluse of traffic experienced on the side "streets" (Ramona Avenue ani the driveway). A signal is not anticipates within the next 10 years. In addition, traffic generation woiOld be approximately the same if the protect site were deyeloprl with sing14 family uses t r,f tead of multi-family, •as shown in the following calculations Single family - 3.15 ac x 7 du/ac* : 22 units IU.00** 220 (VTPD)*** %I ti-f ami ly 38 units z 6.10*'* - 232 (VTPD) *Based S,000 sq Et. average lot sizes (low medium 4-8 dwellings units per acre} **Based upon daily trip generation rates used in the Mastev, Environmental Assessment and General Plan Environmenty, Impact Report for single family and multi-fuiily uses (page 91). ***(VTPD) m Vehicle t„i ps per day, Traffic levels as a result of this protect wiol be relatively minor in ,comparison with levels predicted along Arrow Route as a whole and in fact, have been Included into the total r projected figure. As Arrow Route is a significant eastlNest arterial which transverses through several Jurisdictional Windaries including Fontana and upland, the street will be designei) to carry the projacted traffic load of 45,9000 vehicle trips .O'er day at an adequate level of service which will mitigate the proposed traffic-cencerns. g. Cultural Resources. 4 9a Maybe, The existing Croswell house located at 9074 A" Route „ 4 is on the City!!,- Historic list Gs- "surveyed, undertimined status": The house was not designated as a Point of Interest or a Local Lan&arA' status due in large measure to .he property oY/her'S qn� sirio to th desjgnatio�g However cUsist pt w`t� Lna !T t+:#C�re ervar€ion CQ13�is Ions recom d'hold on, i1e :1 part. Si -> „ E1,,_ Page g hoasa has been incorporated into the design of the project site and could potentially laceive'a designation at some later date. 10. Health, Safety, and Nuisance Pacto7,s. 104,b Robe, Staff has recelytd two (2) petitions with a total of 110 st,gnatttreS requesting that,-, "stress level report'• �;a prepared to analyze the traffic be'eeets on physical and .mental health. (Exhibit 0). With respu*ct to increased.traffic, staff has determined that the atwount of traffic genara�id it a result Of the praJasct,:'M 4e insignificant in cbmpa'rison w;yi:h traffic levels proitected 't�,occur airrsavf Rowe. As grow Route is a significant east/w*o\t arterial which traverses through several Jurfsdicticoal both ries, the street will he designed #o,carry 1 the protected traffic load of 45,i O vehi'clas per `da}h,';;x an adequate level of servile. "Preparation 0, &n Environmental { Impact Report is reconrAnded. "� + Residentf,have also expressed concerns regard._.,j a potential fncrease lit incidents of crimes in the general at-ea. Based upon these expressed concerns the staff, with the help of the Sheriff's Department, conducted a statistical analyst, of j multi-family projctts:;netr the proposed project site. The 9Ieriff's Department has divided they City into reporting dlstricts for mans of statistical data gathering to track the j nux' ._`�_bf ca'is for service. In addition, data is collected by ir+ la �BisgC'# Illus trate the ntraber of calls for service- for r2p4.ting district and for spesigic units within each: distAct, 'llret study period ran froe� tiatrcar 10 1939 to fty a, 24&9. the-multi.f"Ily 0rGJ*C Z Were Chosen due to proximity totni� project site along A"ow Route, similarity of age of.the projects bind consistent zoning designation. All are within the MM uer Residential District. (Exhi bit E 4 F). Tabla 9, Calls i=era^ 'Umcee for RaGriig tlfstrfets ...m---------�----M RD* CFV, ACRES CFSfAC DISTRICT MW14P 031 221 275 ,90 District Crised of multi- family, alder singli' fAmiIy development and some induct �1a1 office. z� �. w <3,l Part rr Page 6 032 192 155 1.24 Diverse ma e-uD. Combination of single family tract housing, an older duplex apartment_ complex, older single family homes, and some commercial alonD' )Foothill BouleV—d and. a : mobiIP home pro�o�i;; 033 24L 191 1,27 Primarily single fandly with some i limited multi-family and (; co iercial dev %poent 052 667 955 .7U Largest dfist-ict. EArvidly varied with older single family, multi-family, older commercial - de,)el opmyertt ,and industrial 023 183 310 .59 Prima.rily single family with a small amount of comtrciai. *RD Reporting District, CFS R Calls for services. **,+eke up of each i-eporting district may vary as some may e►zdompass primarily multiple-family housing and older single family housing while 029 is primarily shale family. Table C. Calls for Service for twjgcts RD uFS UNITS # UNITS jCFS/units 031 50 Meadogood Village 328 Condos .is 10130 Shady Oaks tyara�s} 033 g Spanish Oaks 150 Townhom,,r4 15 10161 rr"ar Routs (carp;yrts) 052 33 Vineyard h l age 164 A.pts .20 8950 Arrow' Route (carports)' 052: 39 Robertson Hornet 114 Apts .34 87+01 Arrow Route (carports) 052 5 TT 12621 90 Townhomes .05 Sfw/c Arrow Rout and Madrone t gar Agis Par;. It Page Calls for service in the primarily singl-,'- .family reporting district (0291 tend to be the lowest. Rowever, reporting district (033) which also has a majority of single family development has the highest number of calls for service. Nigh levels within this distric£ are related tc the fait that it encompasse3 the"'NOrthtownzi area of the City which tends -Go have a large number of transients, illegal aliens and has two (2) known' gangs., District (032) alse has a MO rate of cal' . This is.pmbably'the most diverse district. The large ntup'i`e1, of calls is maybe due to oldor commercial development � nq. Foot?tOl' Boulevard and may also be attrib!ited to the: order mgoltle h*06 project south of Foothill Boaievard and the older.�,ialN-family complex east of the project cite. Reporting districts C'M and 052 al*o have a higher rate of-tolls than district (0291, but this maybe attributed to higher densities in these areas. Based upon discussions with lieutenant Peppler of the San AML Bernardino County Sheriff Is Department, incidents of crime generally tend to increase with OKI*acing density. However, the increase is also function of management and ease of ! oppnrttunity. for example, where there are a large number of cars available, such as in a multi-faxily: project with unenclased parking facilities, auto related crisis tend ,to go up.r. According to L; euttnsnt Pedpler property and auto crimes tend to' bo the most n Orous in multi-family projects. Other Oictors affecting incidents of crime also Wn lve special circumSfancos. For exaaialt,; the number of r transients gear- itrrm Routs west of Vineyard Avenue aft have art imo�act on units' wititin tU inediate area. Also, the subject site is located about one-four% , one.-half a milt from the "tiorthtown" area Whid) has gang activity. Two projects were tramples to ,determine types of calf far' servic5 generally dc4urring for in the area 'the Nt, chosen Were the yi fleya,rti lh l l age, l ocated at $9660 Arrow Route (No. 3 on iMxitibtt 0), and the a>sish Oaks, located at 1015A Arrow South (W 5 on Exhibit; 0 . The following lists the types of calls for service for the period betoeen ?Urch 1, 1989 and May 8, 1989•, i f { � 4` lr Part II Page 8 Table 0 Calls for Service by Ca e ry ?!ate: These figures represent "calls for service1l by the Shrriff's Je0artment and do not necessarily represent actual crimes.) Vineyard Village Spanish Oaks 8950 Arrow Route. 10151 Arrow Route #35 No. Fie aCal e Na. "ype �f tail I fi got I suspicious Person 3 burgl sr I di stur,bane 4 disturbing the peace I warrant arrest 2 calls for service 1 purglarf (notification of an Mergency) 1 repossession 2 suspicious circumstance I burglary. alarm 2 vandalism 2 shots heard in area I repossession i forgery,`report I man with a gun I missing juvenils Aft I disturbance call I fight I burq 2 loud music calls ,l ary i domestic dispute 2 loud party calls 2 battery calls 1 hit and run accident I prowler call I hnknow I keep the peace I grand theft auto I assault with a derdly weapon 1 keep the peace, I suspicious person 1 suspicious vehiClt I peaty theft I unds�the influence of narcotics I drunk 10 public I t--44ry I under the influence of narcotics I grand theft i laud music cells 2 loud music calls 2 traffic collision calls �\ tat -Wnaayard and Arrow, Routs) TOM= Td. I Mitigation; Require an Environmental Impact Report, 10e,f Yes. The proposal would have a direct impact in generating noise by construction' activity and construction equipment. • This impact will be short terse and should be mitigated by f fol'lezairig City standards far alloWabTe hours for constructia activity. Oevetopment,_,.:r.'Section 17.02,120.E specifits tha u construction shoul3.take place between 6:30 a.m. and 8,;00 p.m of Cbndav through Saturday, and provided tl;at noise 1eve1�� re ed o e c ed 65 d®A plus tse limits_ 'specified in,; ec on 17,Q�. 20. .�> Part II, Page 9 In addition, the future residents of the proposal wpu13 be subject to traffic related noise impacts from Arrow Route. The N ty`s Generalv an projects future exterior noise le*gels of between 60 afi(jI 70 Ldn, Based upon an acoustical 'report prepared by.Gordon Brickeo b Associates on,-February 27, 1989, a sound barrier of at leant 7 feet in hefot (relative to 'pad grade) is required for patios which are exposed to Arrow Route In order to achieve an exterior noise level of no greafiar than 65 CNEL. Interior noise:mitigation measures are required in building construction to achieve a minimum. of 45 CNEL level inside the units.and have been specified in the report. 12. Utilities and Public Services.. 121 Maybe. ' Per Lieutenant Pvpplbr of the San bernard,no County Oeriff`s Department, the Sheriffs pepartment basal; manpower needs on past city growth trends and fixture projections. The projections do take into account proposed -densities indicated within the City's General Plan. Therefore, there should be adequate manpower to handWincreased growth within the area. 12J Yes. This project is served by two school districts, the Cucamonga School District, which encompasses=elementary and Jr. high students, ands the Chaffey High faint School District which handles secondary (high school) education. Based on information from the districts, both are currently impacted, however, according=to John Castello, of the CucarAnga Sriobi District, ;a new .school is under construction in Ontario w0ch will --iritigate the problem in that district. The Chaffey. Joint School District, however, , has recently infantd the City of Rancho Cucamonga that they will no longer be able to meet proposed capacit loads .:have asked the City to help determine'appropriate steps to resolve Vie problem. At this: time a solution has not been determined. As a result,;, additional analysis through an Environmental Impact Report is required to dete.�mine`impact on the school district as a result of this project. The following table pra�'i.des projected' student generation rates for the affected school a.Istricts as based on Generation Rates ontained within the City',,, Master Assessment and General P14n environmental Impact Report, pg. 147. Part II Page 10 STUOENT GENERATt ill GENERATION DISTRICT RATS NO. OF'UNITS . No.i OF STUDENTS Cucamonga .60 38 22.ii Chaffey .15 38 5.7 Total `2 ;' i Exhibits: A •',-Statement Q Overriding Conside,`ation 6 -�Free Ident{;i cation tap �� C - Development District PUp 0 ,- Pgtition E - Ri;. tir►g District Map . F - Surveyed Reporting OistrittA Pro$ect Locations NOTE: Exhibits included as part of Staff Report Aft I `I 1 i_ t GT PRCWF.RTV .�..��-•� � -_ -.., 1 1 �'._..,-�t�.'� fir+-e�r` ' lit � �' F.. �� ►z Prn��d reU;� one . ....ems,- �'� ""►" `L` i•-- NOR' CITY OF tTE RANCHO Ctj _ A TrTL& SITE PLAN Date: rune 26,1989 lull, t l To Chairman&members of the Manning Commission From: John Liao,the developer,of the Arrow Route project,DR:88-1T Re Response to retult oaf 6-19-89 Neighborhood lvfeeftg i Dear Chairman and Conadss oners: l 1. The majority of the 25 res dents showing up at th1!A2nd,Neighborhood Meeting(6.19-89)expressed their preference of undo project over apartmen:project whichwe originally intended. They feel,this way, those issues(poperty value,drug and crime rate,health,etc.)will either _ be eliminated or become insignificant, The traffic issue was mentioned but the impact is either non-existent of minimal,because the Arrow Route will be widened to a 41ane street long before the project is actually completed. The school issue was not raised,maybe becoeme a new school in Cucamonga School District is being built,which wiff��itigate the impact by the 2L6 students generated by the project. The impact on the Chaffey Joint Union High School District is eyen smaller y'le estimated 5A high school `;udents. As you were told'before,we would build condo units,if this surely will eliminate the public controversy and make the residents happy,even though higher development cost and further delay to obtain the building permit, will result. 2. With,as noted above,the public controversy being eliminated,i�+fatu , we would ask and appreciate your support for waiving th �gi irement for EIR(Environmental Impact Report). We feel the EIR will not help'the residents,but will definitely increase the housing cost for the future owners of the condo project,since EIR is costly and time-consuming to prepare, Some new much larger projects on Arrow Route in the vicinity were also _ waived with.the requirement. 3. If the compromise meets with your approval,we will be happy to: A. Submit the tenta iv a map,for review in about 3 weeks (arou:0 7-19.89), It will be a separate apt lication and,to avoid further delay during review process,it is requested, the current application(as apartments)be continued as usual, similar to Vintage Townhomes:(DR 97-14;Tract 13650)which . is clos6*,\and still under construction. B. Further re+\3�ce the densit- y on the pkoposed situp a total of 36 units(11 ..c compared with nearby similarinew projects~ C s Vintage T lyomes 13.9/ac,Mulberry Place 13,9/ac, I Rabgrtson*,Ir mes 13.8/a4 in the same coning of medium C. Ask the ci ty 0'o'des, the house(9874 Art)W Route)as the landmarkbuilding,long requested ry the city. 4. We do appreciate thee effort by the planning staff to uphold the city's high IJ development standards by strict reviezr of our project package for the last 14 months. In parallel to that effort,with your support and that of the residents,we promise to build,an upper-scale,high quality,well-maintained condo project as an excellent mZOel to a neigi, Irhobd,when"teamwork"to well keep the properties in good shape is very much desired. Again thank you for your help and cooperation. Ehc nereyy Liao Ph.D.,P.E.,Developer 3L:�'vl June 20, 1989 & •##n nnVV-11.sst. f AIN AN 26 xe Cindy Norris S V 1a,a14 Egli 10 11 Planning Division 1 1 1 t t , � 9320 Base Line Road, Suite C ` Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. 91730 SUBJECT: DR 88-17 UNIVERSAL PROPERTIES 38 UNIT MULTI-MILY COMPLEX Dear Cindy: A At ttip Planning Commission meeting scheduled for June 28th, they will p ask you what took place at tte previous r_eighborhood meeting (June 19) with John Liao of Universal Properties. The chairman asked that we rdeet t good faith to discuss a "CONDOMINIUM PROJECT". Universal Propertie• did not meet in good faith according to our intea-nretation. John Liao was presenting an apartment project once again, even aKer a unanimous show of hands displaying ` oar interest in condominiums. John kept using language like - I will consider, He did say he would build condominiums a couple of times but the last word. was - .he would consider condominiums. If we agree to a condominium project and there still is a need for an Environmental Impact Report on some issures, i then John wlll feel free to build apartments. Condominium:- for individual sale would relieve our worry of cTl4e to a great degree, but the Planning Commission may decide in the interest of the community certain EIR's are necessary, k'e ask that the City Council postpone any permit for build# until John has submitted the proper map and sub- divided the property"in question. This will protect our interest and good- will negotiations. V� ask that you let it be known whether or not John sub- mitted a letter to the City stating that undtir penalty of perjury he is going to build a Condominium Project for individual sale. We also ask that the Planning Commission at the same meeting discuss re-zoning of this area to.-, single family dwellings as we have already done more than our fair share in allowing an over abundance of rental units for miniumun wage-earners in our neighborhood without rebuttal. We would like to enter the process of changing the zoning at this time. t { Unfortunately we did not have the chance to discuss with John Liao the quality of his condominium project, such as a playground for children, recreation room etc. to make it an attractive project to buyers, and other topics. This was not done because John presented once again an apartment project. Are we doing something backwards? Shouldn't Universal Properties submit a plan .for condo- miniums first then have a neighborhood meeting to discuss the project for approval? June 20, 1989 page 2 R SUBJECT: DR 88-17 UNIVERSAL, PROPERTIES - 38 UNIT MULTI-E'AMILY COMPLEX If we the people agree with, said condominium project we would like to be assured by the City it will be the last one and that single fomily homer,_. will be the only project allowed in this area. Of course we do not wart con- struction for any t_tpe of project to begin until Arrow can handle the°traffic, Whether it be a one-way street: or a four-lane liiobwap Before Arrow is carrying 45,000 care a day we should have an Environmental Impact Report on noiee, stress, and sickness related Lo traffic stess and pollution - the cost of widening versus. the cost of putting up a one-way sign on Archibald and Arrow up to Haven. Thus protecting the integrity of our neighborhood On behalf of the petition group and concerned homeowners, we thank you. q gS-increl Mike & Linda Cutillo 9668 Alpine Street i( Cucamonga, Calif. 91730 987-2654 _ I IllIJL�UUI�ilJLll! U }(714)Aso-7ae!�2a W. , PROPERTY MANAUEMENT!,IND. 9229 Utica Avenue,Suite 110,Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 June 13, 1989 ylC� City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Divisicz �l tcX!'.t' , •41 11-tt' P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ATTN: Cindy Norris Re: Village Parr HOA Dear Cindy, Enclosed is a copy of a letter I sent to you -�a August 11, 1988 opposing the proposed site of 38 apartments to be located on the J north side of Arrow Highway opposite Ramona Avenue -APN: 208-311- 03, 94, 21 & 24. I am still representing the 181 Henebwnert that live on the south side of Arrow, ,just East of Ramona, at the intersection of Arrow and Fir. There is considerable concern regarding the traffic these apartments would generate, as it is already difficult to turn Nest onto Arrow from Fir and takes'as long as two or three lights to get through the intersection on Archibald once entrance to Arrow is gained. I have :.- Lacted the Traffic Division of the Rancho Cucamonga Sherri,ff's to try and obtain a history of the accidents on Arrow from the cross streets of Archibald to Hermosa. They have nothing of this nature readily accessab:le, but Sgt. Alvera will try to put something together ; for me and I will forward this onto you, or bring it to the meeting. There is still concerns from the Homeowners regarding the crime rate acceleration in the Area after the other apartment complexes were built. I will try to attend the meeting on June 14, �_-].ong with a representa- tive(s) of Village Parts Homeowners Association. We are strongly in opposition to this proposed plan. Sin rely, n Elma St. John Project Manager nn-. Rnnrri of T'11'�"L"E.Ora^ �. Reglongi Offices Irvine Rancho Cucamonga * San Clemente South Bay CownWwn Laos Angeles • Coachella Valley La Jolla U1 /UI UUUIJ LI I (714)980.7386 24Hr. Pw®P .RTY MANACEMENT,INN 9228 iJtica Avenue,.Suite 110,Rancho Cucamonga,CA 9173.0 August 11, 198$ City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division P,O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ATTH., Cindy Norris Dear Cindy, Pursuant to our telephone conversation earlier today, I um writing this letter in opposition to the proposed site of 42 apa.rtmentsyfile #DR 88-171which will be located on Arrow Route across from Ramona. I represent Village Park Homeowners Associa`4on, 181 yL vate homes sit- uated at Arrow Route & Fir. - There is considerable concern from Village Park as the crime rate has accelerated in the area since the apartment complexes were built to the East of Hermosa aid--on the North side of Arrow Route. There is. also concern regarding the traffic on Arxow,Rot1te as the street is reduced to two lanes at the principal site of the proposed apartments and it is ai.eeady difficult during traffic hours to turn lest off of Fir onto Arrow Route or to turn aouth onto Fir. I I realize the gx�vth side-Of Arrow `route is zoned for medium density; housing and the property owner is in his legal 'vQunds, but Lr.r the xecora, I would like this oppositio4 noted and when °there is going to be a hearing for the Planning Dept, and/or the City Council regard- 11 ing these apartments, I would live to be notified. 1 Thant: you very much for your cooperation and assistance, i I SinoLrely, Elma St. John Project Manager for VIUAIE PARK HQA Regional Offices Irvine + Rancho Cucamonga + San Clemente South Hay + Downtown Los Angeles + Coachella Y,�Aay * t o Jofla -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 28, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, C'I;y Planner BY: Tom Grahn, Assistant Planner SUBJECT': ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL I)SE PERMIT '9-12 VICTORY A - A request o estaolish a church, n addition to the Serendipity Schc:ol, in two,existing,buildings totaling 5,116 square feet on 1.08 acres of land it-.-the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling ''units per acre), icr-�Pd at Me northwest corner of Bowen Street and Baker Avenue - APN: 207-531-31 & 50 r t 1. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Re uested: Review of a Conditional Use Permit for a church within an existing building. ' B, Surrounding.Land Use and Zoning, lror os gos Ll emen ary hoof; Low Residential District (2-4 dselling units per acrer) South - Single family rtai denti al; Cow Residential CAstri ct (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Single family residential; Industrial Park District (Subarea 17) West - Sing3c :family residential Love Residential District (2-4 drF311ing units per acre) C. General Plan Designations: Project ire—Cow Residential North - Elementary School South - Low Residential East - Industrial Park West Low Residential D. Site Characteristics: The project site contains two buildings -,:,iich are cur ren y 5eing used by the Serendipity School, One building is a`converted siagle family residence., the other building is a f mer church. The site is fully improved wit),, parking, landscaping, and recreation facilities for the schoa;, i i -—M4 J e PLANN?NG COMMISSION STArF REPORT RE CUP 89-12 - VICTORY BAPTIST CHURCH June 26, 1989 page 2 E. Parking Calculations: Ntmber of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required. Provided Church 974 1135* 28 34 Sanctuary *Churches require one (1) parking space for each thirty-five (35) square feet of seating area within the main auditorium where there are no fixed seats. F. Applicable Regulations: The Development Code permits church uses wzth�n c>e pw Residential gistr,ct subject to a Conditional Use Permit. It. ANALYSIS; A. r.ckground: On August 12, 1487,. the Planning Commission approved-Coo'nditIdnal Use Permit 87-22, a request to establish a day care and preschool for 120 students and 10 faculty. All Conditions o;° Approval 'nave been met and Vie school is in Aft operation. f B. general: The applicant is proposing to share occupancy of the wl .o b.63'tdings currently being used by Serendipity School (see Exhibit "C"). Building A totals 3,276 squart feet and w111 be used for church services. Building 8 totals 1,838 square feet and will be used for Sunday School. The church would operate when the Serendipity School is not in session:. S ecifically, the hours of operation of the church are as follows: 9:30 A.M. to 2:00 P.M. - Sunday 6:00 P.M. to 7:00 P.M. - Sunday 7:00 P.M. to 800 PX - Wednesday Also, the applicant intends to use the facility for special meetings during times when the Serendipity School is not in session. srena pity School operates Monday through Friday from 6.00 A.M. to 6:30 P.M. They are licensed to operate the � school on Saturdays and Sundays during those some hours, but have no currP:4 plans to use the facility on those days. . C. Compatibility The project site is surrounded by residential uses ar,3 an elementary school. The applicant is propo^+rp to use an existing building that was originO ly designed and PLAWING COMMISSION'STAFF REPORT RE: CUP 8942 - VICTORY BAPTIST CHURCH June'28, 1089 Page 3,, developed as a church, currently b�#ng used by the Serendipity School. Since no compatibility problem, are known to exist between the day care/preschool and the surrounding resiJen-:tai uses,, intensification of uses on the site through the Incorporation .of ,r6liglous services should not present a conflict with the adjacent residential uses. D. Parking The project site is fully. developed with thirty-four T341 Parking spaces. Based on the sizR of the sanctuary, a total of twenty-eight (28) parki.nj� spaces are required or the church use. A condition has been included in,the Resolution requiring the Conditional Use Permi'k to be brought before the Planning Commission for the royfe,w and possible revocation of the use should the 4rongregation's0ze grow aid create parking problems which negatively impact tiro adjacent`residential uses. E. Foothili�Fire District: Tha application received preliminary review .rom a oo ll Fire District. Prior to u;cupancy, the applicant must, at a minimurd,- 1. Obtain a state license; and 2. Install autorsatic'and manual fire alarm. F. Environmental Assessment: Pert I of the Initial Study has been com e y e applicant.. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental C,hee.Iist and has found no s''gnificant inpacts on the environment as'a result of this project, III. FArTS FOR FINDINGS': In order to approve the Conditional Use Fe rml t, e AR ss on would need to male the folIowirc Findings: 1 That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the ob3ectives of the Development Code, .and the P�!rposes I of the district in which the site is locateC. 2. That the ,proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or walfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the 'proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as the public ea5 ring"-n The Daily Report newspaper, the property-posted, and notices sent to all. property.owqr T thir-300 feet of the project site. i' PLANNING COWISSION STAFF REP6RT RE: CUP 89-12 - VICTORY BAPTIST CHURCH f . . June 2$, 1989 Page 4 V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Commission hold a public Hearing on i s Item. If, after�considering all p,ublic comments, the required relndings can be made, adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval would be appropriate, Res f il; tt Bra nne r: BB:TG`:1 a Attachments: Exhibit "A"-- Letter from'Applicant Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "C" Site Plan Exhibit "ID" - Proposed Floor Plat ResoTwtidh of Approval r, lw City Planners Rancho Cucaronga,,, a. Conditional' Use >?`. 'nmit s� April 15, 1989 _ Dear Sir: r The conditional use permit is for the property listed at 8736 Baker St., Rancho Cugamonga,,T -Ca. it will be used teach week :as fallowera. 9:30 A.M. to 10030 A.M..`.,.... .Sunday School. 11:00 A.M. to �t2:60 A.M........Morning worship. 6:00 P.M. to, 7:06 P.M..., ......Evening Worship. 7:00 P.jh "to 81'30 P.M... `�,3...Wednesday Praj r Meeting. We will also-use the facilities for special meet- ings when the Serendipity school is not in session. ,r In Christ Service, i'. s Je ry Spores ller ,.Pastor j II Peter 3:18 -1 i I Q I IF FORTH CITY OF RANCHOEM. CU NGAd TITLE:� Urfa PLANNING DIVISIONu EXHIEM: SCALE: � :d i r.V} ., T: • 1� 41 . l I 1 1 a f 10l� i IoNI'i I a it, 1 � e6 1 i !!!swats 1 Inzt .wets q 1 am— v AIM Am as 91 im Iel�t a �iinttnw°!.2,PCnm d f� /�.r,•I .�r/�•/ /,/l"// /...r �j _ Y/W.I.:d1 01SM Y� E JV SItY / / Nt i •,� Wftg i vww. v..... oQlrve C.LL..Ilz7e• at = 1 I, 1 C.L.IBBilI! . ■ t !' f 1 Al .s '-���ara.f. w..�....or 'w.w ...r.� s :.r�.T--• .r�.w.e®ww fr:.+rrsi:..w •� �' NORTH _ I'I'Y OF ITEMS �KANCHO CUCAM NGXA TITLE: PLANNING DIVISION IT:NCB SCALE f � L. i V J �RIStYOPMS W sack ic+g I i o�icC � CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE:fkvill- b%A PLA IVISION �� g EXHIBIT: � SCALE: ..�. Original Poor Q ality O � \ I 10'•-4» l7l :3 f rtlEFf 0IM6t �i j I' c th \�f a �� �� a•'� \ N ' c DY li, CL4l�T VH iRG406 6 iF KI SINE Tq iE I lIOVED PAU L __e G. +w(.� GWE PSe►MlIP i t0IN r nj r �,NAd b N rN. cvrw. I llll ~ N (. 1 X1 r i•1 Y V r 4xn m eeelc. I x LEM sw®.a.` CaAm .6 LVM—, W"A CPA"WW i 9 ws=1 dl 1% 2-3 W. I Ty 4 I I AN Q CUCA ON A TITLES PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: sJ_ Ot SCALE: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF TY_1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG& CALIFORNIA, APPROVING'CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89-12, A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH A CHURCH IN TWO EXISTING BUILDINGS TOTALING 6, 16 SQUARE FEET ON 1.08 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BOWN STREET AND BAKER 14j!�-_JE IN THE LOW RESTDENTIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 207-531-31 & so A. Recitals. (1) Victory Baptist Church has filed an a pli'cation for the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit No. g3-12 as descried in the title of this Resolution. Wreinaftar in this Resolution, the subject Conditt.onal Use Permit request; is referred to''es "the application". (if) On the 28th of the Planing Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conaucted a duly noticed public hearing on-the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of thl's`. Resolution have occurred, j B. Resolution. NOV, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of >Rancho Cucamonga as fpilows; 1. This .Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the fact set forth in the Recitals, Fart A, of this Resolution are true and correct: 2. Based upon substantial eviftce presente4 to this 6zWssion during the above-referenced public hearing on .June 25 AM, including l`�tten and oral staff reports, together with public testim , this Co.mmissiot-.4ereby specifically finds as follows: f' (a) The appli4, 'ion proposes_,f ilizing an existing; facility totaling 6,116 square feet-located at 8736 Baker Avenue; and (b) Tne property to to --, :h of the subject site is the Los Anigos Elementary School site, the �r;.�,4tty to the east, west, and south consl�,ts of existing single family residences; and 4 i _ L PLANNING COMNISUOR RESOLUTION NO. RE: CUP 89-12 - VICTORY BAPTIST CHURCH June 28, 1989 Page 2 i (c) The application contemplates a Joint use of the site which currently contains the Serendipity School day, cape/preschool whict was approved through Conditional Use Per'mit.87-22,and 1 (d) "' The applicant proposes to use the facility on Sundays from 9:30 A.M. to 7:00 P.M., on Wednesdays from >:00 P.M. to 8:30 P.M., and during times when the Serendipity School. is not in session, Serendipity School operates Monday through Friday from 6:00 A.M. to 6:30 P-M. 3. Based u' on the, suh,tanti l evidence presented to this Commission during the above-refP�enced pudic he(iring and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in para4raph 1 and 2\`above, this Commission hereby lands and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of thie Dev4lopment Code, and the pkrposes of the ifi riot in which the site is located, (b) That tine proposed use, together with the cand2i .,airs applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety,,or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or Improvements In +he vicinity, (c) That the proposed use comrplres with each of the appl(;,cable provisions of the Development Code, i 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the.California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration.. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions nie-jorth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves th�'application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in�porated herein by this reference. Planning Division 1) Arfy modification, expansion, or other change in operational Use Permill equire a revision t,) the 2) Approval of this request shall noti^: waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances and any community or specific plans in effect at the time of occupancy. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. RE: CUP 89:12 VICTORY BAPTIST CHURCH June "28, 1989 Page 3 Amok 3) All signage proposed for this Conditional °Use' Permit shall be designed in conformance with ther,City's Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation. 4) If the" operation of this Conditional Use Permit causes adverse efts to neighboring' residences, tha Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission -for the consideration and possirle termination of the Use. 5) Plans for a change of occupancy'" shall be submitted to and approved by the Foothill Fire Department and Building & Safety Division for tW r review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits. The plans shall indicate: A. A seating diagram for the sanctuary with the type of seating illustrated. 8. The proposed use for each r► -g,, including ages of children using each," r,_,W. 6) The shall not be occupied by Victory Baptist Church, except for chum-, ,office activity, until completion of all improveOnts requir-ad by Building and Fire Codes to the satisfaction of the -Building & Safety Division and Foothill Fire Protection District. 7) Cpvvating hours shall be limited to weeiends r: and after ?:OU P.M. Monday through Friday. 6. The Secretary to this Comission shall certify to the adoption: of this Resolution. E APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JUNE, 1989. r PLANNING: COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' BY _ Larry 1. WRIel, ChaifW ATTEST: �drGa bulter, Secretary —Izz PLANNING COMMISSIGH RESOLUTION NO, RE': CUP 89-12 - VWORY BAPTIST CHURCH June 28, 1989 Page 4 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing. Resolution Has duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a`regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on ine 28th day of Jdne, 1989, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONF.AC* NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS. M c I' { 9 o CITY(}F SNCAt; JGAIYi0Nt1 S��'�1FP REPORT DATE; June 28, 1989 TO: Chairman and.M%bers of the Planning Commission FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: MODIFICATInN TO TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 111934 - L. A. CNANCO - ,A requ" esr 5 change "'i�arce p o. o en a4it Parcel Map No. I2573, asubdi`visjon of 2.72 acmes. into 2 pa-cell located on the east side of ArOi-In ld Avenue, ApproximatW=i$0 feet south of Lemon Avenue (APN 201-252-03) I. ABSTRACT: The Developer is requesting to change the Parcel Map number from 11934 to 12573�- ` II. BACKGROUND: Tentative Parcel Map 11.34 was, approved by the Planning; omm ss on on January 11, 1989. Th approved resol�ition (No. `89-04), the Staff Report, and meeting minutes are attac"d ftr your reference. III. DISCUSSION: The developer has retained antther Engineering Firm tLinvila and Associates) to complete the map processing. The original Parcel Map Humber (11934) *as oblwii ed by and belongs to the previous Engineer; therefore, changing Engincers regq.<res the xeapproval of the project under a different number (12573). There are no other changes to the project. The Conditions of Approval retrain as previously approved. IV. RECOMMENDATION: it is recommended that the Planning Commission approve e a ac e�'ic"tt'esolution approving Tentative Parcel Map Number 12573. Respectfully submitted, Barrye . Nansort Senior Civil Engineer i BRIT:BK:sJm Attachments: Letter of request Staff report, minutas, approved Resolution 89-04 dated January 11, 1989 Approval Resolution NO May 34 1989 Ms. Barbara Kcull City of Rancho Cucamonga i nglneering 'Department aS20 "C" Baseline Road Rs►;cbo C:camnnga, California $1701 Re: Welts Praporty Formerly Parcel Map 110,34 Dear Us Kru11S -. t, f We are torva4y requestiaag;'"-!,e parcel map number on the above mentioned proJect to be�r aviaei due to the-ohAnge of our ckril engitfeer_Qn the"pro4dct, troa>Pfeller & Associates to Lfi,v;lie fi Associaatea, The original nAuber icr this parcel Va►s 11934 and our civil �dtginter, Ken 1-0,nvi'lle, etontaetvd iius3e11 i+iagurr,e and gas—told that it- the 'number has to be roviagd to 12573 we need. i'letter° regoeoUng the conditions c; approval" to be tvansfer to the,nek parcel number. We are aware tl►� (if the neap Is-not approved' we Kill forfeit the plan check e`ot s760.00. A130 attached is $207.00 so that we caa4_rbe placed on. the planning c*m*-kasian -IQ on ,tune 28. 198ar:` It there is any problem with thts process please contact, Rita Salazar at (714? 861-1547. Since Steven Chan President yI RCS/lp cc; Ken Linvill R 22G32 Golden$Orings Rd.,Suite 270.Diamond Bar,CA 91765 TEt 714)861-1507 FAX(714)86G-3761 C1TV OF'RANG`-:.c,°CUGAXI ONGA UAFF REPORT r �(Supplemental-) DATE: January 11, 1981, TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission i FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior�'Civil :engineer BY: Joe Stofa, �Ir , Associate Civil .Engineer ' SIWECT: Eld9IOONi WAL Asbessm': uMi)i-AxATIYE PARCEL MAP-11934 . ! L. v s. on o acrettig a A. n4 into parca s n the ?�;�dium, Density Resider dl District (43-14 dWling units per acre), 1ocat7d on 'the east side of Archibald Avenue approximately 150 feet south � f Lemon Avenue (APN 2014U-03,1 I BACKGROW: finis item was continued from the December 14, 1988 Planning CoaWssion Meeting in order to allow additional time for t;:e applicant to review the revised conditions of epproval handed out at the 'meeting and to- clarify the land use derignatien for the area. The December 14, 1988, Staff Report is attached. II DISCUSSION: A. Conditions of Approval; The conditions of approval require that the cost of improving, Archibald Avenue along the project frontage 'be rei ,jrsed to the:' C', uptu development of Parcel 2. The purcncser'of parcel 2 c69tends that--*,he property owner had are agreement with the City, stating that , improvements were installed tta exchange for ti' necessary :.._ irC of way to complete the City peoJect, Staff contcnds that the agreement ortl Pertains is t'A propevty if it; remains at its current use, a single family residence. If the use chahges (a. subdivision in this case), then the reimbursement '} of improvement costs is appinpriate, because those impir V*:�tpnts would_ hive been required as standard :procedure the sabdivalen. s PLANNING GOMMW 4 STAFF REPORT TPM 11934 - L. A, Ghanco, Inc. January 11, 1989 Page 2 B. Land Use Designation: tion: The Tentative Parcel Map was advertised as Medium Density (8-14 dwelii`ng units per acre (DUA)) as shown or. the General 'elan' (Exhibit "D"). Several area residents, who attended the December 14, 1988, Planning C6 tlssion Meeting, expressed their concern for this high density. Upon further:review, Jt was noted that the Development- District desionaM x for the site is Lower Medium Density (4-8 DUA) as,shown on EYiriablt i6E". The size of the proposed parcels (Parcel 1: 0.51 acres - 1.96 DUA and Parcel 2: 2.21 acres * 0.45 DUA), fai* eXceed the more restrictive designation of 44 DUA, The density of the,portion of proposed Tentative Tract No. .14125 within Parcel 2, currently in the review process, is approximately 6.2 OVA, which is within, the 4-8 DUA designation. On December 28, 1988, the Planning Commission directed staff to initiate an a%ndment to modify ,the Genera] Filan land use design.-t'iofl foL the,area from medium (8-14 DUA) L'aw-Medium (4 8 DUA) to correspond with the Development District designati(sn. III CONCLUSION: Staff feels that the conditidi)s of approval are appropriate for the project and that the parcels to be created by the subdivision are acceptable under the current -Gener, Plan Designation and are consistent with the future development of the area. IV RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning C^mmission consider all i,iput and ele,eents of the Tentative Parcel tap. If after such consideration, the Commission can recommend approval, then the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negav ve " Declaratioft would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, i SRH:JS;sjm Attachments Portion of General Plan (Exhibit "D") - Portion of Development District (Exhibit "E") .: Staff Report of December 14, 1988 Planning Cownission Minutes of December 14, 1988 ,r' —AND USE RESIDENTIAL _ FRY LOW <2 DU's AC LOW2-4 DU's AC LOV."- MEDIUM 4-8 DUS a MEDIUMS-14 DL's AC MEDIUM'HIGH 14-24 DU = aC HIGH 24-30 DU's AC , Hillside r LL. Lwii jT C. ,ec ` o el CITY OF r"' PAPL L MAP I M34 RANCHO CUCA1V O�lGA �L PLAN (LaN®u LEGENC RESIDENTIAL. VERY LOW L 2 DU AC LOW 2-4 DU AC . » LOW-MEDlvlb", a-s DU AC MEClUM 8-g DU AC MEDI!.RO-HIGH 14-24 DU AC HIGH 24-30 DU AC 5 arm ��� t�.•.� ,i4, _ PC -..ram m ,. CITY OF nme PAPM MAP l 19 3 4 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGrI STAFF REPORT r~, DATE: December 14, 198$ TO: Chairman and Meyiaers of 'the Planning Commission MIK, Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil. Engineer BY: Job Stok, r., Associate Civil, Engineer . SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSES94ENT AND -TENTATIVE PARCE4 MAP 11934 - L.A. su v s +on Of acres of into Farce st=. n -tW-4e-dium Density Residential District (8-14 tiling units per acre), located on the east side ,of Archibald Avenue approximately,150 feet south of Lemon Avenue (ARN 201-252-03) I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Re nested, Approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map as s Itl�f iY�on M a. Parcel Size: Parcel 1 - 0.51 Acres Parcel - 2.21 Acres C. Existing Zoning. Residential (8-14 Dwelling Units/Acre) D. Surroundina Land Use: -; 4 North - Residential South - Vacant East - Vacant West - Residential t'f E. Surrourdin2 General Plan and fleae�lopnoent Code Qesgnatiors: North - (Residential South - Residential East - Residential West Residentia'� �) " I, � t� c� PLANNING COMMISSION .;AFF REPORT TENT. PM 11934 b L. A. CHANCO, INCORPORATED DECEMBEk 14 198$ PAGE 2 F. ,Site Characteristics: The site contains an existing house on proposed part;el 1 with an exl,sting barn on proposed parcel 2, The lane slopes approximately 3% �o the south.c, II. ANALYSIS• The purpose N'f this Parcel Map is to create 2 -separate' parcels. The ey."sting housd�will remain onJparcel I and parcel 2 wilI become a portion of the future`,-Tentative Tract, 141E5, which is currently in the review, process (Exhibi "C"). The street improverien"ts alofg Archibald Avenue are currently under construction as part of a. City� Capital Improvement Project. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:. The applicant completed Part. I .of the Initial y.. Study. to con ucted a field investigation an'J completed Part II of the Initial Study. No adverse impacts upon. tNe envirounant are anticipated as a result of this project. Therefore,-,,issuance of Negative Declaration is appropriate. IV. CORRESPONDENCE Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding f property owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the I site has also been completed, EEEE V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the,-Planning Commission consider a �n�u and elements. �t .the Tentative parcel Map. If after such consideration, the Commission can recow!nd,�vproval, then the,adoption of the attached`Resolution and issuance of �� Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, I Barrye Ai Hanson Senior Civil Engineer BRH:JS:dlw Attachments: Vicinity Map (Exhibit "A") Tentative Map (Exhibit "B") Fu,,Ure Tentative Tract 14126 (Exhibit "C") ROaoTution and Reco:wended Conditions of Apprr>val s oW 4 S ere a9 V Aff. NI • • ti.•' W • off la a vpe N AAA/ Y ;.td ST. t ; Af.! G -V L 4 N B� It i6", err fvf drr ZITY OF . PAPMEL MAP IIg34 RANCHO CUCMONGA ZTTmIL. V 1 CI N ITN MFkP MG 3i G- Pd O it �r 7 ' Original Poor Quality �e lu # —j � :ate` ( Ira Y •,•�" W. i wti o • A"QI!Y ,�to /`!R ' ante ma 1 j d f` j I+�OCPQ.3t/9.^_'�+"✓' w uurIs ams arae'am i r n r t .. .. n �v.i°'NOW uam vy 0 iggo J< gig PA.t?C el- M.4G .Y A it rn F q crry OF PAP.LEL.MAP 11q3_4 RANCHO CUCA.MONGA `rM& TEMP• °TIVe MAP, ZTG :ca DIMON TRACT 'No. 1412 m1w.0♦Its V p I'll1u1�41 ILf2UII.lot t."114W If 14 IOW♦11 .MKI Jrt M'NWpY.IQ Jlht••1 OCTOOaSR' !'tB0 ArAl ..•- II�� •.� lo; I Original Poor Quality .Iti I( i .. ,....«r A ��. p�, ti �/11�1 tt�rr....�s.r� /,.. •i, COP t llili�1� try _ r• ': .f .+, •� .a. s •t "�. I.o i tl %-. •{ :•, + •�--,"".�'' /f♦ ,yam^ �a y''Z � '1 I'••I j}�+,i- ,�� a� :i�7s• �}1 � ate.`.�, .a�����.•� � �'•�� MY OF MULLMNP t I , t 1.. RANCHO CUCAMONGA FUTURE TENT TPLACT 141 ` s4 � rt i NG G D OIL "1 I, PUBLIC HEARINGS I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 11934 L. A. CHANCO. INCORPORATED A su v a on o .. acres o a n parcels n e e .uar ens ty Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located on the east side of Archibald Avenue, approximately 150 feet south of Lemon Avenue APN. 201-252-03. Joe Stafa, Associate Civil Engineer, presented -the staff report and revised Special Conditt.- 2 to require reimbursement to the City of one-half vidth street imprauearents on Archibald fronting Pa,nel s 1 a,nd 2, relocation of temporary retaining walls, and installation o %issing street improvements. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Albert Dayton, Pfeiler b Associt".es Engineering, requesiAd a continuance to discuss the changed condition.. He watt,'` the property had been purchaiied on. the basis that Archibald would be iWovea and they wouldn't have to pay for it. Y',onnie Corcoran, 9859 Cypress Court, Ranch* Cucamonga, ^ranted to knord i f the item would be continued to a specific date and asked if she could be notifiti of that date. ;hoirman McNiei stated residents could sign up and the City would send notice to ::hers of future hearings. { Laurence Gast, asked if the zoning had already been approved. f Chairman 'McNir,' stated the zoning VAS approved, as was the General Plan. r Mr. Gait stated he had previously attended a meeting on another tract, and thought no more multiple housing or medium to high density projects would be r constructed abrve Highland, Chairman Mr.Piel suggested he stop by City Hall and 100k at the General Plan with one of the Planner$ to familiarize himself with the zoning for the area. Scott Anderson, tW, Liberty, was shacked to find out the area was zoned medium and aske4 if there was a possibility apartoonts would be bs;.ilt. Chairman M01e1 stated the possibility existed because of the zoning. Sarrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer, stated the item being considered was merely a parcel map to separate W* house from the remaining parcel. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that flan Coleman,: Senior Planner, had just 'I lookcd at the Lining map and the area was actually Zoned Low-Medium density (4-8 dutiling units per acre). Planning Commmmission 'kinutes .g December 14, 1988 —� Ms. Corcoran asked if that meant apartments would,not be built. Mr. Buller responded that apartments would not likely be profitable at that law a density. Motion: Moved by Chitiea, `.:conded by Blakesley, unanimously carried, to continue Environmental Ar...-asment and Tef..•:ive Parcel Map 11934 to January 11, 1989. Chairmanr McNiel asked Ms, Corcoran if she would alert the surrounding residents of the continwad date. Ms. Corcoran responded that she would. J. ENVIRONMEPTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88-26 SMITH - The addition o seven rtment units to an exisring apartment complex consisting of 633 units on 5.33 acres of land in the Medium Resident":al Distric (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located on the east side, of Archibald Avenue, south of Church Street - APR: 1077-332-26. Chairman McNiei stated that the applicant had requested contimxnce to January.. 25, 1989. He opened thz;1 Yublic hearing. Motion: Moved by Blakesiey seconded by Chitiea, unan%ously carried, to continue. Environmental Assesssent and Development Review 88-26 to January 25, AlMh 1989. e K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL. USE PERMIT 88-45 SIAN GARDEN request esUolish the sale of hardiquor for on-site consumption in an existing 2,160 square foot restaurant on 4.05 acres of land in the R;r� ho Cucamonga Vfilayv Shopping Center, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Ramona Avenue - APH: 1077-621 34. Steve Hayes, Assistant PT:vnmL r, presented the staff v tpart Chairman McNiel .optned the public hearing. Skip Nelson, owner, stated he was available to answer questions. Chairman McNiel asked how the restaurant would serve c,,%ktails without a bar. Mr. Nelson stated they planned to mix drinks in the kitchen t- selroe at the dining tables. 3 Heerrag no further testimony, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner U ;iea stated the operation seemed to be clearly a dinner house- Ila,r type operation ad she supported the use. Planning Commission Minutes -10 December 14, 1988 , J. En(VIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88-48 - EGGHEAD e miques es ablisH a computir classroom aR o . ce ii a ease spaue of ' square feet within an existing walti-tenant tndust`'ial park on 4.01 acres of land in the Haven Avenue Overlay District, located at 9170-9110 Haven Avenue - APNt 209-262-17. OLD 9USINE.SS N. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW E8-37 - UTMAN-MCDONALO A PARTNERS - The development of 3two-s ry 26,265 square foot office buiVdilnq or, .09 acres. of land in the Haven Avenue Overlay District (Subarea 6), located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Acacia Street - APR: 209-401-01: (Continued from December 14, 1988.) Motion: Moved by 8lakesley, seconded by Emerick, to continue Environmental Assessment and Conditional Use Permit 88-48 And Oevelopownt Review 88-37 to January 25, 1989. Motion carried by the following vote.- AYES: COMNISSIONEI : BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, E4EkICX, TOLSTMI NOES: COMMISSIONERS:• NONE t ASSENT COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL -carried PUBLIC HEARINGS F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TEVTATIVE PARCEL MAP 11934 - L. A. CHANCO M r- - A Sub Sion o g parce s n NOW Dens7ty Residential District (8r14 d"'011in� units pe►' acre), located on the east side of Archibald Avenue, ISO feet south of Lemon Avenue - APN: 201-252-03. (Ccntinuef frail Rscesysr 14, 1988.) Joe Stofa, Associate Civil Engineer, presented the staff report and recommended deletion of Special Condition 2.a., which required reimburs-mnt to the City for cost of %treat improversnts on Archibald fronting Parcels 1 and 2. Vice-Chairain Ch4tiea-opened the public bearing. Albert Dayton, "oiler A Associates Engineering, staged they wort happy with the conditions as slued. He -%guested reimbursa+aant for one-half the cost for undergrounding utilities a dng Archibald Avenue when properties were developed on the opposite side of the street. Lawrence Gaiefsky, 63W Jadeite Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, asktd for verification that project density would be no more than 4-8 dwelling units per, acre. Planning Comission Minutes -3 January 11, 1989 ANIL Otto Krokitil, Deputy City Planner, stated a General Plan Amendmei+t >ras in process and scheduled to be heard at the January 2% 1989, P,annicg Commission Meeting. He stated the Amene mnt contained a series of land ule changes, including lowering density for this area. Connie Corcoran, 9859 Cypress Court, Rancho Cucamonga, asked if the General Plan Amendment would change this project, Mr. Stofa responded that Parcel 2 would become part of Tentative Tract 14125, currently in the review process: lie stated the developer was showOng 11 lots. on 2.21 acres. h+s. Corcoran asked if the lot: were for single detached family homes. Mr. Szfa ;confirmed 0ey were. Ms. tot4:Pran asked if she could be notified of any future action on the project. Brad Buller, City Planner, respc,,ded that if her property was within 300 feet of the project she would automatically be notified of any future public hearings. a Hearing no further te0tisony, the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Blkkesley, seconded by Tolstoy, to adopt tW Resolution approving Env,,.4nranta� Assessment and Tentative Parcel Map 11934, with deletion of requirement, to hAm►§urwe City for Archibald street improvements fronting Parcels 1 and 2. MotioF carried by eft following vote: AYES: COMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, dBrT"F.A, MRICK,+TOLSTOY NOES: C"ISSIONERS; NONE ABSUT: C%XISSIONERS; MCNXIL -carried H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESMT AND TENTATIVE TtACT 13930 - VINBR00K DEVELOPMENT resiUntial sMOvision o s Ina le fatly lats on 15.72 acres Of land -A 0& Very Lora ftsidtntial District (les. than 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the east side of He`rlun Avenue at Wilson Avenue - APN: 1042-071-1 and 13. Chris Westmar, Assistdat Planner, presented. th- stiff report. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if there was enodgh riot-of-fit available for Nilson street and the parkway to continue t2 AmettWs*.. Mr,. Westman responded 20 feet would be available for most of the trail. Planning Commission Minutes -4- January 11, 1989 RESOLUTION NO. 89-04 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING. coMRIgSION uF h,4{E CITY OF RANGA TENTATIVEUPkCEL "MAPANUMBFRI139CaNetIOCATED�ON�EQVING EASI SIDE OF rRCHIBALO AVENUE`APPRoxrmATELY 15o FtEe SOUTH OF LEMON AVENUe,y AND} MAKING FINDIKS IN 'SUPPORT THEREOF. APN 201-25243 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel ''Map Number I1934,„submitted by L. A. Chanco, IacorFarared, k,,wp3;.cant, ,for the purpose of ,,subdividing 'into 2 parcels, the neat Property,j� tuated"in the'Lity of Randhs,axgamonga, County of San Bertaardipo, State 6f.i�4`ifur��X�a. identified as APN(i) 201-252-03, located on the, east side of ArchlbaT4- Venue approXfwoly 15o feet south of.,Lemon Ave ue, ana;, ldHCaEA3, o AI.mb6r 14, 1988, she Planning Commisfion held a duly advertised public ft-pfng for the;above-described map FOLLOWS; NOW' i'HEREFORE, TitE RANCHO CUCAWNGA'PLANNI'iG COMISSION RESOLVED'-AS . ,. SECTICU 1 Thai,t1he fol',owing findings have been made: I. ,',kt the nap is consiAent witti the Genert,i Plan. 2. That the imprWemenvv.Of~ the proposed !v&ftvision is consisted; with the Genet�al Plan: I - 3. That the site is pK.�sZ:'-�11y Suitable for the C Proposed df,41opnertt: ' - 4. That the propo;"4 subdivision aad Ampruvement:s 6TI not cause substanti'a3`enviru n^,f,i damage, public health Piroblws,Qra leave arse -affects on abut�,ing, r property. SECT;ON 2; This COWss on fiids and certifies ihat thh'project has been rev ewi ea an-rconsidemA in Compl$ance with the C411fernia Env_eoraental Quality Act of.197 4ndz further, ti�is ._P�+,�s$-�?sE.:�;�..-i���e� �`i�gaiive Declaration. SECTIOR 3: 'Drat Tentative Parrl 'Nap No. 11934 is hereby eisproved subJect bra attached Standard Conditions and the followin§ Special l Conditions: n! PLANNING C"ISSI6' TSOLUTION N0r4"$9kra4, TEN'ATIVE PARCEL Mt, 11914 - L. A. £kAWO, ,INC. JANUARY 11, 1989 ,:= PAGE Z Ge`veioper may reaua.t ,a reimburserent aegreementt'! to recover onetihat the City adopted cost for undergrounding�„f;;,u future develooment (redavelopment) as it occurs an the apposite side of thp`stre*';a Z4 The following reiatiag tb the Archi:;ald Avenue frontage of both Parcels 1 and 2 shall bj 6apleted upon develp!Hhent of Parte`i 2: a. 7ha existing temporary Ntaining walls Iscafee"Within the street right 4f-way shalt be ral ooUt outside"the n treet J °fight-07-Wa,Y 10 a:coi^-jance with the approved City .Drawing { !lumber 1241, and JJ b. Any n#sing street improvements ir4ltsding landscaping shiAI be installed, i ARpRQK1:Q AND Musitl»a THIS w1T�,DRy OF Jl+R!GAAY 1989 PLANNING 1tOMASS104 0." T+!r C' fy Crr HO CetAW A �in t Ba, •, rr► -'. C^ ATTEST: I, Brad Doi r, -Se6retary, of the Planning Comi,"ivn`of the City of Rancho ; .. Cuca;mcnga, da hwtby corttfy thAt the foregoing ksu,lutiorr, �s duuly, anv5 regularly'introduced, oatsed„ aid adopted by the Planning Comissipn of,the City of Rancho Cuw*.e nga, -ot a tgui'or meting of tn* PlaniftV Co*is"00 lreld on the 11th day of January, 198-, by tho fallrnainq voo-b-wat RYES: C"ISSYW iSG'" 1U.XESLiY,-'CHMEA, MERTCK, 1(OL5TOY NOES: GGll tto510 ABSEN": l; tSaTONfRg: HC,�;�r 4. N. !ol '�� � �- � + r ^� CaX^ s `' $f� •fig e- _ t _ 12 —S all ;qgB _ A . § ap HA,all A AM $ i a � a : s = y� " »146 UZ r T „ q ' it 11. i_� y�i _p+ ■�. ML V yyYyyi 1` � T 1 � f48_ f F h '� g�� •`MYo 54 i SuS Y x y`7 u„u ♦ L 4• cdc a a E Mg.y, pp�ywy _8 �' i sill tz 41 As its L N ` a o.� e � Y ! RESOLUTION NO. A il(ESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THz, CIV OF RANCHO CUCAMONtikj�,_-CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE FARCE:.' MAP NUMBER 12573, LOCATED ON THE 6X5T SINE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE APPROXIMAELY 150 FEET SOUTH OF LEMON AVEi4UE, AND- RAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN 201-252-03 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Ma-' dumber �12573 submitted by L. k Chanco, Incorporated;- appl scant,,: for the-, pu pse =;af. subdivf4ing._into, I_ parcels, the real property situated in the City o� Rancho Cucamonga, County of San. Bernardi«to, State of California, identificd a APN(s) 201-252�-OS, located on the east side of Archibald Avenue approximate 150 feet south of Leaaon Avenue; and WHEREAS, on June 28, 1989,1_the Plainii eom "ision held a duly advertised public hearing for the above'-described taiga NGk, THEREFORE,,) THE RANCHO CJCANONG&PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED_AS FOLLOWS: -� SECTION A: That the following findings-have been made. AdSL 1. Than the map is consistent with the 6ssne,41,Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent;yith the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitahle for the - pml posed developmea. <. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements a ',1 not cause substantial environmental, (d4�avage, put;�:c health problems or have adverse affects on abutting properly. - SECTION 2: This Cemoaission finds and certifies that the protect has - been rev fv$aidXrcisi fl,.-toil il'�31tLe with the kffT orrtiia Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commissiooa hereby issues 4s Neg;)tive Declaration. SECTION 3: Than Tentativt:!-Parcel Map No. 12573 is hereby approved subject to t attached' Standard Conditio-is and the i'oltow rg Special Conditions: i fs PLANNING COMMTSSIOM, RESOLE7ION NO. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 12673 - L. A. CHANCO, INC. JUNE 28, 1984 PAGE 2 SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunication and electrical) on the project side of Archibald Avenue shall be under rounded along the entire project frontage (bout parcels 1 and 23 extending to the first pole offsite 61orth an4 south), prior to occupancy of ;any buildings within Parcel 2. The Developer_may'�request a roimbursemeot agreement to recok^{-ole half the City adopted cost for undergroundxng fromm 'duture development,',redevelopment) &z it occurs on the opposite ,side of the street, 2. The following relating to the Archibald Avenue frontage.of both Parcels 1 and 2 shall be completed upon develc)xmnt.of Parcel 2: 1. The existing temporary retaining wa"115't'located witrin the str,-et right-of-way shall be relocates"'autside the street fight-of-way in accordance with the aOproved City Drawing Number 1241, and 31 b. Any missing streer improvements including Taiadscaping shall be installed. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JUNE 1989. PLANNING COMMISSION (1F rdE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. BY. Carry e , ChaTntin ATTEST: Brad 80ler, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secr(atary of the Planning Commission of the City 'rf Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and alopted by the planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Cumission oald on the 28th day of June, 1989, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COKIISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ASSENT. COMMISSIONERS: a. aM` - ���'i 4i�� aL �°' Na ac a i :� � ° � • 'ppc �■Z�.. Cr G.' Lu,. p 'p' 'YJgtl V G.ni v N y+�YY11FF 11�. «T tf ■e Cc ..YYq M�Cf 4e t1 .F "+'�A. Ia�Y �LY r � L:� Ord �v y4 4•� co `$ '� _ rY L'Vy^ «♦Nw wVq ��CC _�yy��fiOfi�{{�OEC C'Oat ?ea Z* c;77 u I Z. «» L 4 y ` ➢f ' y.. rs wyn u - B g 21 5 � 'uyG aA aN u g �• �°' o uLn++ � 'ate. �Y� �I �,+ ,uY►. ► ± V m !— C 4 i 0 •'Y•L b Y�w Y I. V,.7 U b C � jy{+ d+ d. I uvvi �n avi$ ao� 'V g uva ctti.0 __ _ --.-•'.--- { i} .. - 11 ��. y�y q q 4a V a 1 uC l G se W ..Syr OR W �C Oy OSC Y.� 9W t►3 1�r « w Y N 4�i M 4'•• y4y t g p4� 22% Yzr NG kGOO GOL �/., f S Y U4VM .cam 1 �S ez. Gb4 .. Lly uND� I m CA ti ay L L Y�V dt yii... y/ v ypr yp@a .ii $u V 4 ,p■�,' Alp4..� w� �L L Zc 3.4 St f�4 �; 0GG G4 it C¢ �.1 DWG ••.�., �� �.�9 y��. �� �i� {�L W p. 6a4 may, � �4 ,p O iitll� L CI n' �T O . p :Cd M.y. Qy t Off. NV wN pY..Y ..G.GQ 9 Ali tl.��1' � oho Yo vat. gc a Q W C + o KaD ec 1 a: L wcai` 2a c9e $u �{ br 4 W �d a �w I ow4 K s +•�. �`�o. `a•t1 a. ho n. KOC o su `n yttt PFULER ` ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS twlV L ENGINE':ERIXG—o S.U-P..V.EY1,NGU 612 North MarSoPd 8PF 8ouf8vard+',,a4ond Bar,Caiffotata 91765 (r4)595-4077•FA�%715}A8o-.',967 C° June 25, 1984 a ;. 11 C 11 City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road CdTY 4F SMU41CHO£r€r" IMM P.O. Box 603 \ Gt�(itldEr i(i a IilUl�it' Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention:.'?Mn. 35a^rye R. Hanson For submittal to the Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Sub�ect: Obtect>iort tv'Mbdsfxcatfam'R'egaest tts Chank,a Parcel No, 11934 as scheduled for Hearing by Planning,Commission Tune 28, 1989 (Wednesday Evening) Item Number "K" Gentlemen: We regret the necessity for the submittal of this letter to your Commission. However, we have not been paid for work we performed on both this Parcel Map No. IIS24 and Tentative Tract No. 14125. 'W,,have started latigawion pracedur,)s egai:ist the T.A. Chanco Company and we feel that'�he approval of a change in the Parcel number would allow utilization of work iu8t has not been paid for by this company. he procedure of a formal release by the Enginee:!�.,of a Tract ?dumber affords th); "- engineer some proteefdon in the collection of hlsifees. -�-We stLopst that tho new engineer stOt at the 17eginning with his., Parcel map, as v e are not agreeable to util;zation of our work. Very, truly yours, PFEILER & ASSOCIATES MOINEERS INC. Peter F, eilert Pf'esidez E PFP)AEDJcg a, 1 ff CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA � STAFF RE]POR ' 4 _ DATE: June 28, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members,of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planne*, I BY: Bruce Abbott, Associate Planner SUBJECT; ENVIV.NMENTAL ASSESS14ENT P41 CONDITIONAL USE''PERMIT 88-41 "D- AC; . - e eve opment o •a ruc retail, Teasing,--Anu mai n.enance`facility with retail sales of moving supplies,"consisting of 4 buildings totaling 23,206 square feet on 8.2-'` res of land Jn the General Injustrial Distrfet (Stharea 14), located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Santa Anita APN: 229-331-06 A 07 i. PR03ECT AND SITF DESCRIPTION; A. Action Re ested; 'Approval of a Conditional Use Permit and issuance of aNeg"ative Declaration, approval of the conceptual site plan, grading plan, landscape plan, and building elevations. 8. Surroundingidnd Ilse and Zonings q - vacant; Subarea , eneral Inducltrial Couth - Vacant; (City of ontario, ve-wru i� ,euring Fast - Manufacturing & distribution; Subova 14, General i Industrial West : Flood Control/utility easement/vacant; Subarea 14, General Industrial H. General Plan Designations: o ec 31 W - General Inaustriai North - General Industrial South - City of Ontario, Industrial East - GeneraLl Industrial West - General Industrial D. Site CharacterisVcs. The site is presently vacant with no ' si g5i ri can.: vege a on, The site slopes approximteiy 2t frem north to South. IT M L U �r PLANNIi4 COMISSION STAFF REPOOT RE: CUP 88-41 _ RYOER June 26, 1989 Page 2 - E. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Type Sojare Parking spaces Spaces of Use Footage ?%tio Required Provfdod Office ;r �48 1ASO 47 !'1 77 ` Truck Service l: 0 1,t404 3948 1W UT In addition, a totrl of 150 spaces are proposed for rental truce: parking any! 35 spaces are proposed for trailer parkind. II. ANALYSIS'; i A. General: Pvde,`r Truck 'is propoi;�vg, to construct 3 buildings, nc u ng a refLeline facility. ,"he proposed development will serve as a regional.;Adrttinistra'trve i:iadquarter ',for the companv with a 9,348 square foot a:lice bl.il'dng.- This , ;rlY he in conjunction with a 2;400 square foot offi; J ng fLr ire retail rental of trucks, a 15,680 square fo'�crUck maintenaece building and 3,200 square foot fuel island for rental -,ruck service. The office and maintenance buildings have been designed with unifying archftectural r:aterials for >the facades, primarily including scored split face clock repeated silver gray exterior plaster and reflective glazing. B. Special Considerations: 1. Visibility From I-15 Freeway: The close proximity of 4 reeway to e proposed site, nece3sitates special considerations tar the quality of site design architecture and landscaping. -tandscape screenin3 of t utdoor vehicle and equipment .storage .areas from the ireewal, Ts prW'ded along the wtca*Wn edge of the site and v0in the parking, lot ve: icks cto��age area. Scre:nfng of ti.a vehicle storagi 8rt!as has further been pro%'I rbd with: 8-foot high screen`Al is at both the 4th Street and Santa Anita Avenue frontages. The -screen walls are architectur0 ly compatible with ` the buildings. Extensive, landscaping, is also,proposed along 4th Street as r,/%quired for a special'noul and treatment, within the setback along Santa Anita Avenue, and along the northerly edge of the site in conjunction ` with screening the parking and storage areas. r ii PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF 9,5PORT RE: CUP 88-4I RYDER June 28, 1989 Page 3 I 2. Floor/ Zone "A": The subject property is "located within too" d zone and is subject to: storm water inundation frovi Day Creek Channel on the western edge of the site until the Channel is constructed. A two phased plan is p"posed to provide landscaping;which screens the site and mitigates negative infiacts as a result of flooding acro,s the western half of the property, Pha;:<, I ".•andscape plan (see Exhibit "D") has no trees acrO`s the 'northern edge of the truck storage area and few trees-in the landscape setback algng 4th Street. In conjure^;lion„' with Phase I landscaping, a special swing pad is proposed for the 8-foot high screen wall across t14 4th Street frontage, all of which is designed to let stows ,overflow water go relatively unimpeded kt oss through 'the sie from north to south. Because of the flooding potential, Phase I landscaping would be less than wht, would be normalll required. Phase I landscape plan and the swing,.pastel Wl will be constructed as part of the original proposed site development prior to flood control ,hannel and bridge improvements at Day Creek Channel being constructed.. After 1-1,,e Day Creek Channel improvement:; are construc.,pd, Phase II landscape plan (see Exhibit "Ell) is to be implemented. Phase I1 landscape consis;:� of installing, trees spaced close together for screening along the, north property lipe and the planting of additional trees in the parkway along 4th Street, The applicant has agreed to procedures for funding and implementing Phase II landscaping which are part of.the Conditions of Apprcval for this project. C. Desi n Review Co smittee:. The Committee (McNiel, Tolstoy, Coleman) rev ewed the proposed project on January 8, 1989 and recommended approval subject to the following conditions: 1. All required landscaping and screen masonry walls shalt be provided. 2. Mechanisms for providing complete landscaping and masonry screen walls upon completion of the Day Creek Channel shall be explored. The project shall not be scheduled for Planning Commission consideration until this matter is resolved. The Committee shall recommend denial of the >~- project if no suitable mechanism zs available to 1` insure 1^%O_ installation of required lz-_dscaping and masonsy screen walls upon completion of the i' Day Creek channel. _ I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT D RE: CUP 80-41 RYDER June 28, 1989 Page 4 3. The;,green Wall on 4th Street shall he designed to the satisfaction of the„Gity Engineer. 4. Dh accont paving �'"eatment at the 4th Street entry shall be expanded to provide, pedestrian access across the drive aisle. 5. Trees s4 all be maintained in St h,,a manners'`ta allow full development and growth. D. Technical Review Committee: The Committee reviewed the project and determined at ra fh the recommended Conditions of Approval, 'including provisions for site storm' inter drainage, the project is consistent with the General Pl-,n, the Indastetal Specific Plan a'nd with all applicable State, County and local ` codes. E. Environmental Assewment: Farr' of the Initial Study has been completed oy t►e Applicant. Part 11 of the Environmental Checkli;,t, completed by staff, ,found that$-lthough the proposed project could halve a significant effect 4P the environmen v:;ae to flooding. there Will not be � significant effect in this case because of the mitigation measures incorporated in the Conditions of,Approval. M. FACTS FOR FINDINGS,' The project, as _conditionid, 15 consistent with the In tstr a. Specific; Plan and ;she 'General 'Plan. Th.f project will nit bP- detrimental to adjacent propertAes or Muse significant endironmental impawts. In ad¢it.on, proposed use is in cor,gliande with the app11c4ble provisions of„`bhp Industr'Ial Specific Plan, the Developmee Code and all applicable City Standards; IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised' in The Daily Report, newspaper a� public hearing. The property has een posted rl notices were sent to all pr+^-erty owners w'itbin 300 feet of the ' project site. l'.. RECOMMENDATION: Staff re ,xmmends thak---.the Planning Commission approve Condlt onal. L' a Permit 88-42, subject to the Conditions of Approval, through Ldoption of the attached Resolu,0on and issuance of a Negative Declaration. _ PLANNING CUWISSlax`S'CAFF REPORT RE: CUP 88-41 - RYQER June 28, A09 Pace . J Res lly sub . ed, El'ad ' City Plan er Attachments* Exhi ft "A".,- to utilization tap\,, Exhibit ""E*"- t% Plan ZAtbit "C" - Grading Plan Enhibit "D" - Landscape Plan Phase I Exhibit "E" - Landscape Plan - Phase It Exhibit nF" Employee Lunch Area Exhibit "V - Ad!ninistrativ at mice Elevations Exhibit 41' - Maintenance snlliat l Office Building Ele'rations Exhibit ul" - $creen stall Elevations USibit "J" - Scmen Lull tc,Cail Resolutioa of Approval with Candtions i ,y cl 4-1rv> } !' 771i, + r ti, . f i a K M c(.1 -- • d '�� x+ � � �1 a�' Sit AM y. } # • 1;"i, � fig. � '��� y � � j �il�f� •i! ay ff � n ow,wu i.«q`... am:o FEW a it -1 g.w fill +swai¢ieaAs 9!e7eMw1 MMertl s+ara� I. ► : I 1 I1'0 3 e a All W �' f 11 8 22� !. Zi ta B4 tG ii `OUT IN NQ 1 � , F_ E- X ra - -� I r a t a Q i I :i r / ��• a s. I d T �/ a►vw.w i .aI $_ co Ol r \ b to �.JEO r' t • F . �-��! �,.,�„-�, J�`5, .,,ram � //fir' �'°, � �I�• u 3 t a IRV s lIla It �lti'I 1 t ,.. .. `vi c.-:-- 1r ��' `���l��� �� � � h ;� � �,� ;� .�.�� � •�; s. •� .�. �; -�:�Il ,� �: ,. �,• �► t � ���' �, � . `" � ;,� �� A•�� � �I� f �'4 }.,� (((( �� 1 �.�`;�`QL�LQ�Q�"QY'wc�,����QtiQ+Q`Qa�J. 4 4`4.� -.a.:,�- 1► s , . _ -,w. • t�R Ct10f ��. L}! r S S�ji� �►� � �ri �.� 191 1i tiX y� Tt' 17► ���. r•Y Yr Z� �v"y#�,>7%,.�llyi T1�['���Y i•. 1��-7,.T S�i..Y7�„�7•V' r r�l f O } &kz I r» 6 G �ti e 03 _ �s �, \' �Y. .f�4 ' l-1-1 ' �� � M J11..�i[1'�Itt E-- �y � ��1►7 ��� gym,�r�aM �L �''. P ya+l+.y Ii ® � � ��� �. I� ���� . �' h f�:�'! ,o � q ' l W �j wit rr �n 0 Bull Z _ 1 , V, 11 i 71 M ` .t� r _ Y t .'1 �l tb i�.J3j�r• M )•1 { •'� Sal f t q h f 1 � �`r7u. YI 1 �✓ J 11 ,mot Z ti _ .r•,. v�YG�' L: _ Ili/!%� - �V:. `14 aI''� .► � I f i F:y l,�, �'* ' _ �� '..�� �T i' .r f ,` ��41 ' ;fir =�� .. �!� � i 1 ���� r �� �1Zit��l �' :�' is %fir 1„r LP':s��s.x- � �.:/...,c �/.�l!r:, .�"' :f' �,_ x ,,� �� r� .: :.� -�' �. .� � _ - •: - . , ' ® � ,� ,.. RESOLUTION NO, t A REST:,?ION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO,CUCAMONGA MIFORNIA, APPROVING CONUITIONAC Use PERMIT' 8E-41 FOR THE r''VELOPMENT OF A TRUCK RENTAL, LEASING AND MAINTENANCE 'i,1CILITY-WITH RETAIL SALES OF MOVING SUPPLIES, CONSISTING OF 3 BUILDINGS TOTALING 27,429 SQUARE FEET`OW 8.2 ACRES OF 'LAND' IN THE GENERAL INDUSTR,'4 DISTRICT (SUBAREA' 14), LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 4TH STREET AND SANTA ANITA AVENUES AND BAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 224-331-00 & 07 A. Recitals. (i) Ryder Truck Rental Incorporated has filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit 88-41 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter itr this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use permit request is referred to as "the application" (ii) On the 28th day of June, 1989, the Planning Commission of the i City of Rancho Cucamdnga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and Concluded said hearing on that date. (ii'i) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Eesolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Comd'i3sion hereby specifically finds tilat all of the facts' set forth inthe Recitals, Part A. of Ahis Resolution are true.and correct. I 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on June 28, 1989, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this �^omtission hereby specifically finds as follows: J (a) The application applies is property Tocatect an the northwest, corner of 4th. Street and Santa Anita Avenue with a street frontage of 559.7.1 feet on 4ttr Street and a street frontage of 639.25 feet on Santa Anita Avenue with the same corresponding lot depths and is currently unimproved and vacant, and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is vacant within the General Industrial category of the Industrial Specific Plan, the property to the south is vacant M2-Manufacturing within the City of Ontario, the property to the east is improved with �omnercial office and industrial buildings in the General Industrial area and the property to the west tbrktains a public, utility corridor and. railroad. right-of-way within the: General Industrial area. xi t . 1 1� PLANNING CliMISSION RESOLUTION NO. R£ CUP 88-41 RYD£R June 28, 1989 Page x (c) The property is located partially within a Flood Zone "N', therefore, is, subject to potential flooding from overflow of Day Creek Channel. "WeWt through" panels in the screen wall and minimal landscaping within the ficod zone mitigate flood hazards. 3, Nased upon the substantial evidence presented to thfs Cmo ssfoa during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Comnission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed uso"` is' in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code Industrial Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the si'i�a is located. (b) That the proposed use,'-togethew with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to' propertfes or improvements in the v°i ci nitv°. (c) That.the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the 'DevelopmentCode and the Industrial Specific Plan. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission thereby issues a Negative Decl;Qratian. - Z, 3, and eased upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 4 above, this Commission hereby approver the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by_this reference. Ptanning Division 11 That the proposed butldin(j�3,_ site and landscaping be constructed in conformance with the plans as approved by the PlanAing omission for each- rf the development cospoftents. 21 That the, canopy, far, the gus Island Ike constructed with stucco finish to match thie buildings. 31 That the screed wall along 4th S',Beet, with swing panel for release of storm wirer, shall be designed to the -satisfactioh4 of the City Engineer Z- -1 y;, PLANNING COMISSION RESOLUTION: NO. RE. CUP 88-41 RYD,ER June 28. Mg , Page 3 i 4) -That an em•i'ched paving treatment,;ye"provi-ded, at the driveway entrances on 4th Street and Santa Anita AvPr[ue to define pedestrian ..crossing. 5) That written agreement shall be provided to the City, prier to the issuance of any permits, zfini):e Phase I and Phase II landscaping, the tiOln4 of� installation 'of said landscaping and th . method and amount of funding. The written agreement shall $e reviewed and approved by the City Attorney, Engineering Division and Planning Division prior to the issuance of any building permits.,; 6) Tree maintenance criteria shall be daveloped and submitted for review and approval by the City Planner for the project to encourage the natural; growtk charactertstdc�k of the ;alectedr tree species. , 7) I, -�the.,operation of the facility,causes adverse effects--:upon adjacent businesses yr operattiona, the Co; iitional Use Permit shall be ssrt before the Planning Commission for •ahe consideration and possible t4Mi'.A tion of the use.., Engineering Division 1) : Overhead L�f�littit._ a) The existing overheat utilities Ctelecommunications and electrical, except ftyr 66 K.Y. electrical) on the project,,side of 4th Street shall be undergrounded.fraim the first pole oh t)ie east side of Salta Anita Avenue to the first polo,on the west side of Day Creek Chennel. %it undergroun1ing may be deferred until 110 days after the comp)etios rrf the 4th Street bridge over Day Creek Channel ff.a security is posted: and an agreement is executed to the; satisfaction of the City Engieaeer.and City Attorney. Reimbursement of one-half the City adopted., cost for undergroundiny from future development as it occurs.nn the opposite side of the :street is not feasible because the property is located in the City of Ontario. { PLANNING COMMISSION RESCLUTION NO. 1.. RE: CUP 88*41 - RYDER dune 28, 1983 - ►+<-ge 4 b) An in-lieu flee as reimbursement for the previously undergrounded overhead utilfties (( lectrical) by the developer en the east siee of Santa Anita Avenue shall be paid to the City prior tq the issuance of building, permits. The flee shall be,one-half' the City adopted unit amount times the length of the project frontage. 2) A storm drain system, including ;catch basins, shall,be designed and construct;-..',,within Santa Anita ,Avenue to connect the proposed storm +rain shown on the Day Creek Channel plans,, The size and length of the storm drain shall be determined by'sOe ffinzl drainage study. This storm drain is ",a be included in the City Master Plan Storm Drain Syatem. Therefore, the developer shall' be eligible for reimburser'eat of tttis,cost. 3) A contribution in: aide of the reconstruction and overlay of 4th 5.,reet shall be paid to the City prl-r to issuance of building permits. 4) The developer shall be responsible for the reconstruction of the parking area along the 4th Street project:.frontage that may be necessar; due to the improvement of the Day Cre-k Ciiannel. An agreement and surety shall 1 be sgbi:itted to the City and approved by the Ci{3 <Gngirrr ' and the City Attorney to 9t' te_t reconstruction. 5) Flobu ection meesjres-shall be provided irr accordance with the accepted Preliminary Flo(id Report and as substantiated by a Final Flood Report;as arprovsd by the City Engineer. 6. The: Secretary to.th_js Commission shall certify to the-adapt on.of, this Resolatiort. APPROVED'AND Aoopmr THIS 23V'O OF JUNE,'W4 PLANNING COM!f -'SSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, hairuian"^ ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary `j J PLANNING COMISSION RESOLUTr,ON NO, RE: CUP 88-41 "- RYDER n June 28., 1989 Page 5 qp Brad Bul7..f`, Secretaryaoi< the Planirirt Co>�asris9ioh.ai+ the Ci�ev� cf Rar�ch�9 r I Cucamonga, do hereby ocertHy that the forsgolijg Resolution vas duly and regularly %traduced, passedy ae';f adopted'*14 the Planning. Coiii,sign of thy: City of Rancho Cucacrnga, at a°-regular meetil:g of the Pl'arming Comission held on the.28th day of t,, re,, 1498%, her tfte fd1 king yEte to-a4i W AYES: COMMTc':IONERS: NOES. C-.4 -0:TONERS.'. ABSENT: COwaSS10NERS: mp l b `' 32ra Ov�L� .R qhs N... N6ryqpy0 ''$Yq O; aQ^ dQOIbL 'cN Onq q`M ca� 6,. yvA m. E ifqq.O Cc C1Z; as dig �i`3.pa- !pwC�.�+ .y. N:� o .�"b T.Vu V u�4gO�� CUY� -5' q �y�4 �N.�1M.AVN u�'F�o aSF aaQC rce�+.�e an N 0.� ^s q.wr ,.1'v lJy"'9u' aI1 nu.�=y� gatlySru Yemu. `lrita+ o,e.cwo w .ppe L y�, , Rra `� Mw. IA y Nyaw �yr # �ct $ Rq>s a� 'a4 !➢ �A11 Q.iEcfyl.. �s +..I fiz$ y OLY P q �Y.NM dt�i Sp,w�gt1N ••'.II ti 'G.LQ d"V �,bV� YG4 a(.' P Ol us - C.curd +�3•� Nfgq ^ � wm w�Ac ga�d�ga:b� � ea •;:qs�ia.cs��s�. "' w,^..a-� moo. �r.'r ��' s�2'�. act �aa. �4� aafl...s.aw I .ram E yy 'a r H •. �'- O VAS~,}}i 0.0 a � Y..:DY eZ6 d q Rbc o 0 00 `$d" $.`tea C c r. dNq TZ ZZA .®• o ya... .u•t'e'u �Y'3 y4'-'��•„ eaY �y �T.`Y'o 4v Q µ� EI 4 a. u J— V Y Z �a Q1�• N�.N ,i Q�'a ryryY a' VYO V4L ar"—, vYYQ VLV4 b. Quu ®. N LY.�Y SW Y 9•y�• N•:w N„y SA,(yt V a.:S a. a� ,SON LSIX �Y '� YC�Cgwp YYYY4 2 N (•+�a�, 4 N•b•a Q Y 9 a M C � Cf 4 Vq CYi �^.ry:N L42 1 Q S sO OYOQW Ly ON�r Y QI N, a S Gi Y O NY, u��E�1 QZ4.G^ 4 Y VV- '4b' - a�Gi,p NpCCprr ..UNT L _ 9V COAau N: Y-2 : •� 'LYE ea5. ,, a® : fir•-gYVN_ Aµ N Q �x-` Y� by u yY .0 �>Y c t1 YY y ati p'^ �ca LtgO �pp Y • SL q 40"C' 4_1 1Z.—G-S 01 j. 6M MN ys y y 4rd- c v f� qrr�Vjjr�YJ, Ld.0 yDyO MS4�:N�'V�_6 y�,{ r`4OYC�J dA ANY. ai G aC Yq—Ot. .. L .VwYyygw 'L C�NN4—� ~ {"J-M �'"♦ qa, Y 'LC O C 4q C L a wYy yN Y—�Y q YYM a TY a i�N N�f°i w.. ���••.� N�oN�r'�. �e��c'�'�. ���!^ •jS� -.ao.�ew u C.. qua c g Nlo-`L� g�Tu TCu -- t(� YQis IS B4 '�r$ g oin Zv� or. gyp ^�.'s-+ .®, �q• m1a2 d9Y HIRE us a a ZYwaav + .YTiQm �cY� u.n V y a - i� •. �AV N ,Ctl CJ aj 6. VV11pp s a.a Nfr4L� N _ Y 40.r�" G a.CV YN A- C tltl L ari. CEM sL. V C�- v "T -.�" 5: � aa . .mot 1`iaw��p` u8 - ^ia "tea y' _�j+`, e.� �.yq's. r.+;A� �_Ta, -�.: N.c�a,�.�.^��y!•��. �$l)�.L. 'u..�e��L d YrT~ His C®8 `N•l o aY.W V YL q C q p s Y p T �Y HHitMpYpp Y p4� C 'Y{� _?C yMY 4�� N O -tj L4 Ma W+yp�y i Is. LY{�' q y�..41 TO PG Ca�*otlgSg-•w9�• Ye...V Is =3 Q C Yp`• m,+f� ,:rWs pm�}YNp, car �m4 y� o mp.� ' ^',4u-.y4•'V y.�, R 4.s0 O.0 sy�Ctl Al C'�i, 'CiLp+j Wm g '4a0 j.1CN fi.w Y� •^..yew a �e .^yw..ya ci�<. ,,,O Y-yw y�■r• _ M.4•n�VsO YT ;-� ,�..,C4 u0u�� �,,CCY� 4 1� q@C�}•tlL Mw6�O-'Cr, MsY�.*O VIt CL.. •Yja Y-}'( Y Q 9y.0. P rLLO .6. oa �^ y 'r~iwY Y=.� QQ��r p�'� Nto NwNi N,V NY'�6Y yyyy •� Vv�.yYYOL V9 04::A CL �OA ■ Lv 6L ■y Lcs� !t AN-. q� $,Q yLY` 9N p YQ • �Y4 N y^ggqaa yg xq+Su.i0 CO CrN 4L M w ■ � KYY.y..fSCJ NVc. 4Q7uC +u Y.^�y,RV���._b9,�T��. ..h-�Lre91rQQ ® q B 4t t 9 •LNOarc6. t2j V lY ;-V 5V 0 Qub ai4i �-Z� z _t wM� qq Cga�.�y V_ wGp�q�'.0 YC ` qG ■VYv��y LA ���C - lqw �GH� -VN G W C Ty YO bC CapNNyY. !�1�00 LY N� 4 �• t..', q +74 u*�dy6:+ N. Q E4A '^ °.CCyyq. � q M I.,Y O` ).L.yplq Lq• OY1 Y Si tip C �1� �.: N�qi. ° LG ~4 • h +gyp° y.~JiG�N�.N CC�y'.q G �4�w •� ryO�iY r •'� '. AVfy W _C C OtY . C .rLN Gam• NG�� Y�N w,� '�+'$'~" ��' Yid sA.5 ,'Ys, 4~Ywr a wYa Ye�.. �. u LQ uL cw�r ' v:' L«°°�^�Van�o�qa4 i�fc3S' �& yy:a� � YL N VN qL 4^�tL tiN.• Yj YAP CYN qdN n Mp G V Gry .Ni CN^ 4G Y.O .r.Na Nyy Wgri�•yL}+yQ'j pp„CIr V NS$. ��'y�m �N „tLy�T CIy Ld� a q4tl� flq dGG� d �� w��4••.CrNLL.0 aa p.Q.aC qV O4(V �Y L CGYNy��a �CMC y • F.^ Y`O.-..� e'�LEy*L. iyojII- L�Z..4iy ia Y.�& y.N el" Y�mw Y•OO."�+1gw3"^,.. "cy''{M�Y.{ �'g�. "YM'" (u N °yY pss,,,.a•P 33. C'y�L7i� '•C'.NM . N68.... N $ q1. V`H�f\ •OLO . 6-. N�o. N u..o coc am .Y Ne+arF t: N°.y sw' p + gNB _w1f t9r 'p°i NNV�•tl gQ7Y i/�. q Vp Lq a Mr NW jy YydL _y 1CM4 LOL{L�'4!Y �gCii,9.,. CC L 4 g L Q YN L o i/ Os N u rr C ` L d/ N i w- M ^ 4 p y L M�N6W+ 4'Mi Al.',v Twp.-'Irtl'� MV:�vr-IIwY PPw'-W 4:4� yi. q.Y 4�i.'.. fL.W,. . P�Y at4.O ,r�•G tlC Y W t4.�C9 Fi °10 LA •. p pEm y >LaL-��wyr rs ig IL. Lif ..���[n $3 i•.ra. . o¢�' an i ii L► W�f�yi ^ +v YN �~ � � Ca� Y��i GV N Sit— pJ pp Ge �y.UC � _ `Tg�q31 I,N�Na1 9M yC� 'O Ip.; $$�:Lw}}}{ - O.u4 >yQy'6 d■■B w�2' L& Y ,. Vii F;N R=`, 4 �Yi p���Y.a 6i C i� `� • iw V V C tly� C>j€�qq�. LitN Ygw G May sO 1. . b'V Y q� Y.YY CM M.. 4°^ Y Ny _.1= ea'y _�C'�. pp M'Y L4� � ay �� 4^ o .q.M� �QwG sr • QY N 'Cuny�• C V L � ^a� I. � A. CDp`qY ayiLO• 6 Y Y .+Opp ZpO q Clw 4 qp• �Y®4 -' L gGyre6 •� a�. N ^b�. Ste Y ru V�a4 Yi O /OM � 6�=p~Q w yyN��.�pps�� 9Lwyfy u �C[G°P CI L.. NN G.05 � Y•�. r � L yy�C I + b.p °+C �.YG{wr�a �LMVOp ^ ',SN~ �.yY SN 93� °i�YYr "w.M w�N GYM^r6Ly V Hr )TGf iv q K4 VN r� <M.6N0 Kgsm YN I�OH 6L1 `V F••O.°aM� iG(i < � Lu40.'S�r� tl � ■ C Tr Qp o NN 'yyLL l� p 9 C � # C�CCt HW L {u�^.. E t3'a Ly VC.Cp! ...C. CY y tl U9=_ a B EY ZRIa. yp i t$'LY yYg,�c y�W aIS yCs Y`C J W�P q L �0.6��i• F-Kcc p O•y �S� Q`Vy C�wLGyI 6W` M°^LO !O iCJ W. UUA.NNId . AY y. C ON N�V41 ggWL. YN '� q0. ° 4~ [l L%YN ^ YKO +L 11O�W uN� tCC�wN.. S� ~ Yl q�� �YY �L�n V !p _ p1uyA~. Y9y05 ~ � � LEipvy� _Y 7ppyy t� ^L L`61 .�OM NO� CGiCY gC'� St yyy.Ya p��C�� 50 $ a o 5 W1. C qpp A Vy cu cLVy ''F' L�.sL.: t^p�,^.'s 4,2 `r�Y tl uC'°a .�y+•• ..°'m••"°f. +7 raw 'Y�n. a.w � ~ r ai°mac" N a' N d u ±v C MN 00 ,o i1,Y � Yam^ , NNYQ $ � U. NO�'. g6Yi ..$- Xi O',..�14"m.�r.a:pY:x• + '�'r,...w .- `f°' *�'`' HE rZa di`:.., Ao.�c'.L 5S. 4 A wW°a ■ A sr'; =-Vx yN�.__Y�N dS :Li� wt pV 4C L V -Sal His �pp C� qNp 61i O�V SaC '� M V ' ~~C v...- CL' si Hj; y eau Q all E-9a�9 '5��, W �o�° § s qMe �q£'o o bgb1a A- Ed. p> 4�:C��' QQ 3q L^ L GrV+'A p C o a &pr L.+p C�tLL,Y iO �C� t)V.V LVN qC 00tY� S. .23V..~ ng 16'N YYM°.M 2NaY- 4.R ^¢,IGNSL^ r'VTN .. g^ n �; cV G �■6 t� O.yVO qy6�P4 N O w mp°•_S O C � Y L M _& w S a SOB �Qt M i.yY t i {y�C a 35 L.0 a A O OG MM `n0■ N ,C.Y N U.9 C W M O N L M V s OI VOgw ; '{� Neq~C q C•.fQ C OµN 71. YN V±1rC 6�3 i V�_ C� NN g NY.0 pY M. Y 4N • CT��pApa® C AL �^� 64 °q ^9e b.- CO CyyG ■Gi y�qS {�� �AO� N.�O C^a"Y7Y 01 ~ 1� OVpM•� 40wC.CU u OI Cq MQCOS qq GC� 1L�"rta6.tl C4yy. C� `tl law LiIN NW U Y 4 B^+ O�~�Cg~e N L.'+�•M ~CASs V'O{M�{�� N lYpQ' L � VV C U Yd, a ~ 2�`. J,L�^ 6, I�A-q.,. a(4!C `:7 3. . HNG YtiCi uT M yC. !a_iL 1 C gmc GC p M CYcs V l -z y t y��(� y GL dOQ FC$QpiO{SM� N�e4s Y �. O gHI NLtlt1G C G SIN UCI .Jtl Lys 8 N i. A-Z y�y. C L' ge 41 VYgA Ly' O Uq N L y O V` C L a5 ,«> cSS Ltuj Jpr n u p~Q 'eZ L.S py�� `Ctti. �• N CY OU O ,: �M LM e �f�Y Y•` p L n.'. YY ya dq} �NLM pL nNt� Z. �u. L Lcy TLar Ga_L. FTAc Ip y�. by �.dup r ;+•�+ 4 Nw. tl��O L.. W�C ��� �.N � � J ■O VV �. w +Y c N b �•y n u ■Q�p.. Qy C G WC�fJ ,dpy JMUi M W W. Oq C V �C qY 1. VC �gp�1JJl,.tll�a���g�JJ � so� o o g o o�. wSNg Oy2_o_% 0� 9 GN ppp V. N _pd�. 4 sS Vy' NPB.a" H��.L Y�.y L 9 Crd 3 Z.0 yq i��i1 �N� sY V a'Q'� TJ.s�3u. <ou uo ca% � '4 1AdwsN _v� '^ yyLC Uw. V. -j 'lW. v sJ•-n pp io t.1"i �' L +L.`�.i: ue`r 'a L .mom i>s y°1� !I-ai 'a0`20 u. „d„rri ^� II tit^e u V�ofi pC y� L9i� Rimis z g mC F.O CY l rU�M ~Q U N 'I,YJN 4NL. a a tl p. +R r r+Jye O. G w s rr U C Y Y�> a Gr'a. ~6OJ • tiYO� "g f Y w�h�Y. rt 4 � YYY�L44 tl{,��a '$.Ft—Exr a g e{ itsi @� L ^ M VKy 4 I+� YN. .y r4V� by� � y .� �. ® ge4 •� � M� �L Cab. ;s :a' a t Y 1<v d' G'•'p C � i l_2 'r Qp_�rM ..:we ,• I ef N` N�s4seriv•�pi ve aj �'Ji $^ m arr o�:u�yG�$. 'e 21 rp• 1ui��d� eau ofJ i6 C.y12 Ny CT q� a.A dA S. Vw p ]1Y Y71 Q.�4 pJCpCN qLw Qr M. ``yLU LV VL:C��}4• 61M M Yw•aaM V N P,J Y•'J'.•4 �Olw. ..C.'a tlIN CCrY �M �gLI.iP tl�qpJ CY5� � �� My Opp6T'UY NaNs�J1+$�J• CC ��Jr ppJr 'pray O$ u �V, L)w YMO C2 F C4� N4 L3eQi�i 1 d13� e ru ry xa wuu. ao. oaaa.R c�. 121 spa$ an :�. 4 s u Aft i.Nev sw I d�qq_rU Nw {���.� � '^G'1��g'r! ��w•uy � •t! �p q.. O �QT,.. ��_ F �dwu F WnyYw �NQ yd H�ryG u�> Utu T.�• �r�c q'. r" . !°mil w � C ' �p ooy L w wpi V M V 4 D. �� NL$•H ��` •cc i � '�b1 g±[:.+@ N�:. � �.! wy. N Y'. ✓'wi y„ d N,� r1� �'�'" aQyte'@6.� a +'�'`�'''c•'S: c yQ��,�y1�yo� {a+, .a .`rwp' 'd'yo, °�,ao„u, O N�■Q w4 «. .= Vw OVA; C VI F Far 4 p .nC �V wr yu+Mp u }�3�.W a" q tpQ� ^V +rye wu„u �.� �CN.� � �N�' ag�o'� .q ;o.", F.. �x �• aaa'uy+.+ i s a�pyu� aN�' ow �bA_ GV'"� SS aEw t� v$Lq '. �. �y 4t Gp1�0 yy~i f�a A4Lt RLN O�^p6y�. .w ig i9 C C Q ffiif ii "'�A+' 42 5 CC �` ^'"�° 3 sryy�' v N{J""'•.. �' }rptG » 'y T�M. sL�Ye r/.94 of Ja p. t»r S j M^y! .R y{+ �5 R.�N 9.1 p R �uSl �aS,td+, 6'.7i 1+_M yYpy� 2-at. y dU L ti N� .M NM d�� MT yN V G ddV �w wYY. .wM YN •ee F,a P y � ` y ggyq .A.=- �s'i $w5. az P. ww.M..�t a: .12, u�c x % og... p8 SO au OL y tl ,�C}g$. I " .� � to kL A y y YY s% gr p 'd g %, w V all I-S rt CSO L C ga— gg V A Q 7 ti Y G» q N is A% C YyYy V .sue [1 @C43Y• pN rw ♦ Q O CL` R. Zr— �MM- �IStq p L G < E S .. �. au �y eA N 5 Ill .°�S t3 CY L o aN O � # O co �. � get uM 4. 0 MI All ri s a j :P12 t E194 ' Los ju� s-.. iN a o-N lit y Mb M. yy y N ' •�V tl Q G. pp 81!9�VI V� - Z V7 ^. •� L x{■a 'Ya yy+i g S. pV N"�V �oga�ppi" p�■i $ S ® � w+�o pad 46 �a `a� a"a 3rw pwa -ils, �y, LS-Zeo" imp c �v u"p o i V.-S. . N�Yo "tg��aa�., �L Yi YA � � L� '�y��'�g• �+�� ,q.�. �a 14!s '� `�L y yj pt R9 Y^.A'C y q71.4iy�, NyY dq nr N 4i ,y~~d YVYM1� Y■..0 Vii1 ya E {'QJty :y� CtiA YC aYaC qp�� Yd�... Mve,p 4 ; ^^ y�^s d■L S` YYh yyp��` L�n�i <a HIS �/ YppN C- V A+ Y H S 7fi tliL �Ma v f j F ° t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: ,Tune 28, J89 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Steven Hayes, Assistant Planner SUBJrCT: MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87-60 BARTON - A regyest to tit 1,1ze corruga e s e ox rootscreeen ng material on a previously approvesqud and constructed industrial building totaling 13,8I2 are feet within an approved industrial complex comprising 11 buildings totaling 126,260 square feet ou 8.43 acres of land in the General 'Industrial District. (Subarea 3) of the Industrial Specific PTan, located at 10723 Bell Court - APN: 209-142-76 I, ABSTRACT: 'lire applicant (Martin Jaska, Inc.) is requesting to utilize a "steel ox' raterial to screen all roof-mounted mechanical AMML equipment from view. The material is made of a lightweight, corrugated steel and finished with a Breather-resistant coating, The applicant would paint the ;"steelox" to match the color ncheme of the building. 11 BACKGROUND, The City Planner originally approved the overall project of 11 industrial,` buildings on March 7, 1988 under Development Review 87-60. On March 2, 1989, the Design Review Conmittee (Chitiea, Tolstay, Coleman) reviewed the sculptured "steelox" roof screening material as a Conse:;t Calendar item and did not recommend approval h-pause of potential mind problems,. The Committee recomeended VAe use of a "mineret" cement board product. On March 16. 19G4, a letter was sent to the applicant by staff confirming the- denial of the proposed roof screening material. On March 21, 1989, the applicant was granted temporary occupancy of the building pending- resolution of the screening material issue. The Design Review Committee (Emeriek, Kroutil) reviewed the roof screening material as a regular item with the applicant prosent at their THY 18, 1909 meeting. The Comittee recommended full Planning Commission revfew of the proposed material. 111. ANALYSIS: Section IV. A.5 of the Industrial Specific Plan calls of r complete screening of all roof, ground, and gall-Munted mechanical equipment., Furthermore, Subsection C states: rM4 r: I PLANNING COMMISS109 STAFF REPORT RE: MOO. TO DR 87-60 - BARTON June 28, 1989 Page 2 "All scaeening shall be architecturally integrated with the building, design and where poss e a roo parapet wallshall e used to screen roof or wall-mounted equipment, kltere roof-t,ounted mechanical equipment and/or duct work projects vertically more than one and a half t1-1/2) feet abovd the roof or roof parapet, it shall be screened by an architecturally designed enc osure which exhibits a, permanenz nature with the Suui l ifing _3d_ea_yn an s_ a a_ a cods s en with Dui,rdi�ere rcoT-mou'� mec ail ca equipment an or u3uct projects one and a half (1-1/2) feet or less above the roof or, roof parapet, it shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building in all cases." The building was originally designed so that the parapet would screen the roof-mounted echani,r�0 equipment ,;= However, upon placement, the equipment was higherzthan anticipa�ed and therefore, an alternate means of"screening is required. The decision of the Design Review Co ittee was based on the lack of compatibility bCNeen the proposed material and the main structure. The Committee felt the "steelox`.' compliment the architecture of Jle concrete building. TV. RECOWENDATION: If the Planning Cmeissioo can support the propose s eelox" roof sereeningt.material, then approval by minute action would be appropriate. lt,'the Commission cannot support the oroposed material, then the applicant may go back to Design Review Committpo,to study alternative materials or the. Commission may deny the rep. It � p • Res c fullyted: Bra er city P nner BB:SH.ko i Attachments. Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "So - Site Plan Exhibit "C"' = Building Elevations (Building 11) Exhibit "O" - Brochure of Proposed Material ; ~' r l�� w ` W�qq j 11:sA ( i . _ • �4 h S � ED Et Q GGUU y, ! II � .;iiii � I,• cG5 ; ; 4 "1 fit. ( ��: W��JII Nv LX 1'• J�. t I••C - Iy�. + ti t �, .i t 111t 11y�1yil � �r r. 1 • �� ¢:_ � ; ,s III t'1 ti f � j Zia E ( z a� V "n ccess"',0nes-A r ads gable rake lines by support hang- heights less than the maximum, asci omm -a and rake treasofbuildings are and securely braced at the the endwall gable area that can have ceased to be appearance bottom and/or top to the roof o: be covered(building width)will problems.instead,each lean area wall of the building.Real panel reduce accordingly.Therefore, representing great possibilities ribs are reinforced for adequate within practi.-at limits,variation In for ceative expression,identifi- fastening of the support hangars. determining the clear height is cation and beauty. The facing panels are placed ta- available is the designer provid- The Armco Facade,including tween the bottom and top raiis ing the building does ncir excaad the supporting system,provides and securely fastened..Color 1W In width. these aesthetic qualities thrc;gh. coated fasteners are supplied if It is limited to eldewall applies- w design flexibility.construction exposed on the panel face.§offits Lion only for all LS-3 and S-4 simplicity and color compatibH. and back flashing,if required,not bu;!dings as well as.trlder buiid- ity.Available with most Arnica supplied byArmco. Inge of tnose types tabulated Framed Buitdine. Types at mini- Deslg3 and FO ieatfaa. pr-Mousk4. mal cost,the Armco Facade in- Material quality,and fabrication, The Armco Facade is applica- troduces a strong horizontal line, design loads,design criteria and bie only to buildings having a resulting in a lower silhouette,to standards conform to that sptra- STEELOX roof;however,walla strikingly complement the build- fled for the A7mco Building:I may be of either STEELOX ur ing's overall composition and de- porting the facI Furthermors, ARW4V panels. sign. the Armco Facade is designed to ` The Arm--o Facade offers a withstand a maximum dead load choice of four basia n anela: of 12�ound's per lineal foot and t t:avn wo a�n,ypiift wind load of 50 psf with 3'-deep ribs and a 11Y x 4'trap- 2 Ftush-tseod fITaaLQx-Y raw NOW®x-*4a thout a soffit. szoidel.return,24-gage Armco po"d-2s1iWWerumkarc. ZINCt3R;P Steel,min!mum yield i F:nah-focoe.bTZELQX-s-rlss a. The A�dYrI Facade is practical strength 37,000,-si,embossed PC or unezpased-s standard only for buildings in non-u+^w to surface with a e of tea fac- 4.ARtvav-I%*lrcpsasidalNtrs ex. tight-snowareaswheresnz vid tory-appliedfluoiopolymersnam- t -T ' ice accumulattans are not exces- sled color cei,-3s,Class 1 Pro The noncombustible supporting sive.'For continuous pedphera) hazard mdng by Factory Mutual. system is fully integrated with the application at maximum height,It 2.*264 STEELOX-flush faced, Armco Building System-either Is limited to framed buildings 10' 18*wills with two 2"-deep ribs, an existing or proposed framed high and greater with roof slope 24-gage Armco ZINCt3RiP Stesi, structure.it is adjustable to facili. of%'in 12'(1:24).By placing the minimum yield strength 48.000 tate placing the facing panda in lower rail at its maximum clear psi,no"mbossad surface with either an inclined or vertical hexight,the entire gable rake line a choice of two factory-applied plane.The nupporting systom of the following Armco Buildings acrylic enameled color coatings, consists of level top and bottom can be covered by the Armco Class 1 fire hazard rating by Fac- rails horizontally attached to ver Facade: tory Mutual. tidal stanchions hung on pre- :d-3-Ali standard widths 3,e592 3TEELOX-flush faced, de-'ermined renters along the RS-3+-4ty1hru 120'wide 16'eylde With two 3'-deep ribs; peripheral exterior wails.The BCS-3-50'thri 120'wide 22-gage Armco ZINCGRIP Steel,. stanchions are cantilevered from By placing the lower rail at etsar minimum yield strenath 48,000 the roof at bath the save and C I T Y...1) 0 F VP ?7_ 0 R 'L 7 Tff^ rmcnv Tr=. Bipec-6-e wC FklooI (�,A,ial Ab V A CUCAMONGA PLA-MINING DT&VWIIO SCALE: a 8 - - - - -- a 8 t ' a w a w a $ lq AM HZI RANCHO CUCAMONGA I SCALE: PLANNING DI.VMION rn-7 ..... Friar paleek .w Flush-laced 4 ar STEELOX ARW IQ' By placing the tower or bottcm rail at Its maximum clear height,the entire gable rake line of the following buildings 10'or greater In height—can be covered by the Armco Facade: TS-3—All standard widths RS-3—4011,ru 120'wida Nominal BCS-3—50'thru 120'wide {',wilding However,with regards to clear Width A B C height thereunder, positioning 30 11 2-6' the facade's bottom rail at min- imum elevation may become 40' 1'-1Y2" impractical on the following ST 1'-4' 2'-1` buildings regardless W width: 60' 11-6%, 1'-10%, E TB-3,RS-3 and BCS-3 RS-3 70' Less than l2•high 80' 1'-11s' 1•-594' SCtS-3 WIr—r 1'-3' 100' 2`-4%' _ 1,—nb, Armco.the Armco Triangle,sr::WX and 120' ZINCORIP O trademarta of Armco I=,ulddl - - ARW4 town,CAIo.. ^A"-HetQht of rfdga abovs Sldewall height which Ingraaaw as tM Building bac aswider. ARW-!V la a trademark of Armco Ine, "I9"-AIWwable halnld variation of Facade dependent W bull6lnil wldlb.'9^will decrope as the building width lndreaMi.Thu Armco if A+a+1'4 alwar r 3r,the neo Faetlewill�w lneandwali gable. "C"-owirsd heads Might.Thus:A+C+t'Should atways be<.sr.. MUM r Q `�s Y Armco Building Systems MainufachwW by AMC*,MOW ProfteftOklalon, Mlddlattotar,Ohio,and Amax Canada Ltd,Qusiph,Ontario cff ' OF a� RANCnV CUCAMONGA mm: a���H� PLANNING DIVISION m,$ s s SCALE; s - 1, . UTY OF RANCHO CUCAMfQNG.. TAFF REPORT DATE. June 28, 1989 TO: rhairmarr;and Fembci,os of the Planning Comnfifsinn FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner SUBJECT: ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT'S REQUEST TO ABANDON PROPOSED ACCESS U"04VARY 50001 AHD THE MET PPE I. BACKGROUND; On June,9, 1989, staff received a letter from Etiwanda cnoo , s riot Superintendent, Carlton Lightfoot, requesting that the proposed pathway approach to the Caryn'Elementary_,Schogl site be abandoned for reasons outlined in his letter of June 8 attached (see Exhibit "A"). The Caryn Planned Community knc- ,s ,"Vintage Highlands" is nearing completion. The community-.s designed to be centered on a system of racreational open space..' Yids open Space system consists, of a series of greenbelts which are connected tc each cul-de-sac street. These greenbelts or "'paser; ° tie individual neighborhoods together, and provide access to rk eational opportunities. The greenbelts are also intended to provide a safe route for school children to reach the elementary school. This greenbelt,concept is cent.-4 to the land plan for the community as explained in the Coimmnity Plan excerpts attached (see. Exhibit "811).. Back in March of 1989 following a disc.-nsion of the City Council regarding another aspect of the„greenbelt paseas, staff was informed of the potential interest q'f the School District to close off this school access. Staff met with_Mr.. Udhtf�aat on--the-taryn' Elementary School site and discusses several options regarding the termination of the greenbelt oraseo that would not areclude passage way from the north into the school property, but that would limit c� the type of traffic to pedestrian traffic only. The developers of the Wt,itage Ni *and project are now in :the process of completing their project and have been requested by the School District to block off the access to;the school. Staff couTd not issue the permits for closing off that accei;d in that, it was staff's opinion that closure would be inconsistent with the Lveyn Community Plan and to close it off would require an amendment to the Caryn Community Plan, which would require Planning Commission action. r G - PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT RE: ETIWANDA 'UOQL DISTRICT `J June 98 1989 Page 2 II. RECOMMENDATION: Sta�f recommends that they SPlanping. Commission' c*7sl der We request the the Eioiwanda School Distric j to abandJpn acid block the access t the greenbelt paseo from ;2ir schoril and )� e... either 17 determine {/he r:auest to be appropriate and direct staff to prepare an acne dment 'tc the i;aryn ,r,ommunity Platt, �r 2; determine that acre from the greenbelt paseo to the school is an important feature to the development-jaf the Caryn Community Plan and direct staff to wok ,further, with the Etiainda School District on alternatives that will maintain the access, but limit the type and possibly time of"access availability. Res 2t11y m stitt n B le , City annex i f BB•ko Attachgents: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Carlton Lightfoot of June 8 199 Exhibit "B"'- Excerpts-:from the Caryn Community Plan., Text Sr411SAM ~ f.7 Ak P.O.Box 248.Stiwanda,California 91739 _ rr' 1714)899-24511 June 9, 1g89 t; Mr.. Brad Buller, City Planner Department of Planning City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 "C" Baseline Road P.O. Box 807 -Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Brad, II believe it would be :to,the.mutual benefit of all concerned If the proposed pathway approach to the elevated northN,r portion of the Caryn School site was abandoned. Because of the steepness of the hillside, coupled with the fact that the district plans to place numerous relocatables along 'Y the bottom part of that hill, I bel*,eve it w=sld create an extremely dangerous, and- possibly libelous; condition for both the city and the E district. He would far prefer to have toe gully filed in and the block wall continued across the spacak where it is now absent., Insidentaily, an informal canvas of the reside7,ts who are immediately adjacent to the gully indicate a - unanimous desire to have that area eliminated. If any further clarification is needed, please feel free,I.o call and we can discuss the situation in grxater detail. Sincerely, 1 _ Carleton P. Lightfoot Superintendent CPL:rg feoaud of Truitaa• R.G.(Jerry)Bredlau Gary R.Collins David vtf.Long rhalt 0. Pruitt Ga; Ma leton P.Lightfoot Cedilla Solono Superintendent_. - Caryn Planned Community, Development Plan Vintage Highlands City of Rancho Cucamnngal California For: Caryn Company Kaufman and Broad, Inc. Marlborough Development Corps I4lorl, By: LandlPlan/Design Group JUNE 1886 J r � B. PROJECT MCRIPTION Ark The project site contains approximately 244 acres of aliwial wash,gently sloping at approximately 4 1/2%, Joe ated at thcbase of the Scin Gabriel Mountain -foothilis_It is situated in the C;ty of honcho Cucamonga and north of the planned community of Victoria. The site is defined by the proposed Foothill Freeway to the south,the extension of Milliken Avenue to the west,flee extension of El=yar;venue to the north,cnd the ex!ensian of a Rochester Avenue to the east. The proposed Planned Community-(P.C,.)is a single-family r*sidentiol commnunity,rot:taining approxlmately'iQ dwellings at buildout of,the current - pro,�aased plan. The o�mmunaty's speciai , identity is a systeiin of opera space that 3 "ties the community together. The bacW)one of this open space network is the parkway corridor. It links the north-south pedestrian greenbelts and the elementary school;it connects the community to major rwrth-south arterials,and W the possible future .commercial center(s). • All homes ore on cul-de-sacs or closed loop streets which connect to controlled accrsss collector loo streets. These in turn lead fo ti community pail ay rcad. The ortoria4 roads abdt".fiiq 'thC P.C.have been, sized to occomodate possible future deveiopmant.to the north of the P':C. To the south of this project, • the right of-way for the Foothill Freeway is preserved. All streets will be dadicated putblic streets. Where appropriate these wit I be maintained,along with ti-4 parks and trails,by as assessment district. Phase i is planned for single-family detached homes North of the project parkway 5,500 ti41,DQ4 square foot lots are plonn,�J,and south of�(6e parkway 4,000 tn.10,000 square foot lots are plc fined. Kaufman 3 mad, Inc. and "Mborouah DevelopCz `Zorporattd}t,.V,a two builders for t,.4e ilte, will utilize both lot sizes. This arrangement should produce approximately sixteen-':fferent basic house designs and fifty or more r _,ant exterior designs,in different color sc tties. Exhibit 4 n the following page is the proposed land use pion. r , j 11. LAND VSE A. RELATIONSHIP TO CITY OF RAANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN The original land use plan was approved in accordance with the County of San Bernardino West Valley Foothills Community Plan. Upon annexation to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, slight modifications occu"rred. The current plan identified in the text and exhibits is consistent with the-City-,of Rancho. Cucamonga's General Plan and has been approved by tPe City Council. Thi�'propose� development is a community of single-family)tomes, compatible with Victoria, a planned residential community immediately south of the project site. Each home within this proposed project is on a ,t, cul-de-sac which opens up onto an open space or greenbelt system. Every street/sidewalk j -. system connects.to a trail network. Each j sub-neighborhood, as defined by an=interior all loop street, focuses upon a part of the open space system. The par�-like eharacter of the project is supported at'the ntriyhborhood level by a street tree heirarchy"for local streets, loop streets, parkway, regional collectors, { trails, and community park. The common theme for this community is the open sparse system which provides an overall focus and a sense of identity. This project utilizes the road stcndards of Victoria and iRancho Cucamor�a to extend the feeling of that community. The character of this proposed P.C. is based € upon the idea of an integrated open space- system similar to the planned community of R Victoria. Like Victoria; the proposed P.C. uses a network of open space to link the'copmunity to the neighborhood park, the eomms._r.iai center and to regional open space and transportation corridors. Central to this Aopen space system is the parkway which ;. structurally integrates the residential i development with the neighborhood park, via street trees, trails, and park spaces. l 10 or - �w a Fm� _~ ��Aplltl����1 Sol ��� ►+®�� ir1''h t/1/11 1 rjti���t��[t`#j��IIL�It � � an an �'a`i1�► 1/�� '����®1y 11rn$r! i�ti' 1fi'#/rt�!1 t11®♦i�' 1ta asliill tsr�/S tu�'►11Y�rairrn ti�1 o yk !r�11 i11A fill wUr[� ,lrtllfi t l/lfllrtti 1 , 1Eti �uUt !ore ,� ► a�riii o�rr �► [ r ae =r �r r u a � m x�i � t� 0. f,l s lip 00 „-uC"r�',%.d+i'..�-.•�:cW•�W Y:�'�� �.'�']�"yy.�ww:gir•n wn"��h�� ��iS �rrr t 0 The P.C. is designed to be compatible with the Plan• :,:r cofnmunity of,Victoria,which is adjacent to the ssiuth..The P.C. focuses on on open sroce system which ties together the whole community through a network of trails tnd park space. The open-space sys- tem provides a sense of identity for the community. and access o communities and regiopai recreation. The idscope palette is designed to be compatible with , e lordscape choract v of established communi- ties like Eth4ondo andwit"iVictoria._As fhesitt slopes to the south of 4%±,an attempt has been made to ket Ds,alt the roads at grade. Where graded slopes ,. cs.i between lots,and i�i accordonce with-the City of Rancho"Cucamonga'core a,ill be taken to reduce runoff rind erosion. The toe and crest of any slope over S feet in vertical height will be r,?unded and designed In proportion to the total he'!Ot of the slope, Prior to ; the placement of fill all slopes greater than S feet will be watered andwhcel rotted. All slopes q�eater than 5' will be hydroseeded`and irrigated. I Tht:road system within the P.C. helps to both define eighborhoods and to ti#,Iogether the whole common- n 1 ty. The loop streets deli:�eote n(,ighborhoods. Within i each neighborhood,a ries of cv rde-sic streets pro- vides residents access to their horde-s to the open space and park system. The parkway widens out v)henever a loop street intersects,to provide a sraall park space as a visual teeminus. Thus,the parkway ties-together all the neighbrhoods a:. xrti?park as it flows"Through the community. The character of the P.C. and unity of the neighborhoeds will be achieved through the use of plant materials. At the Milliken end Ro'.ihester entrance to the community a low slump,d block entry sign announces the name.of the community r`o residents and visitors. Alcsng Milliken,Banyan and Rochester Avenues and the Foothill Freeways a decor a4ive alum*block wall of the sane character as the, entry signs,will buffer noise,provide privacy,and identify the community.. Wooden fences will provide privacy for homeowners along the parkway,loop streets,and trails. See Exhibit 17 for entry sign and perimeter wall character. 47- VII. CONSERVATION OPEN SPACZ� • A. PRESERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES 7 The San Gabriel mountains are characterized by a variety of natural resources. The complex hill and conyon landforms which supply the scenic bwkdrog ftMie vol- ley floor also provide the natural habitat for wildlife, I and the watershed for around water recharge. Much of the scenic value of the regional pi finning area today is attributed to its natural featureY'.. Development impoctM will be rr rilmized by proper planning and monageramt. Attention will be given to proper grading practices,to conserve tops,,,:I and pre- vent erosion. Contour grodir4 technique3 will be util- ized.to blend with the existing natural tc:cain and where'possible,graded slopes.. If o Woved by a soil engineer,grades may ranch a maximum ratio of 1-1/2:1 ratio when used;far contouring purposes Jr.. limited areas. To maintain the foaling of the natural tan'gape and tie integrate this P r,ra�edt into the adjacent bmunities, "attention will be given to the use:of lon� tape maser 14::that are native and/or drought tolercat,artd which see similar to those found in'a djoining communities. B. R$ODUCTION OF NATURAL RESOURCES .; Within the vicinity of the planning area, there are two known reserves of high quality r aggregate,an essential bui,(ding material. it is •Rely that extraction operations v.•ii.l occur some distance north of the P.-C.. Howevecp`pr4-'-'tt#ion af?'bese materials is not economf,A on the priiject site. C. OUTDOOR RECREATION I In addition tc the regional recreational opportunities which have been described in Section IV.D-M$Com- munity Facilities-Poft and Open Spoce,the project will provide a pedestrian oriented open space system. (Exhibits:4'13,and Ik). The�pen space x)stem is based upon a greenbelt tea# apt in which project•cui-de-sacs look onto the greenbelt trails. These greenbelts-act as a continuous open space element tyipg tagcther individual neighbor- ; hoods into a coherent community. These gre*-nbeit l corridors also provide access north of the site to region`.recreational opportunities. This project pro- 1' San Bernardino County,West Valley FoothiiIs Community Plan,,(1983),p.13,11. r1 —=-�— CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: June 28,, 1589 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission ff FROM: Brad Bulger, City Plann t SUBJECT: OESIN REVIEW COMM!iTEE APPOINTMENTS The p? �,ning�o mission policy is that, membership be rotated every six montlt=. Design Review Committee rjpoi:jtments were changed W-rebruary 1989. Wien Commissioner Emerick's resigratIon, an appointment should be rude to replace him on the Re,.iden:Lal team. The current apoointments atz as follows: .`CORMERCIALIINOUSTRIAL RLS O�NTIAL Suzanne Ch#iea Bruce Emerick Peter Tolsoy Larry Megiel Alternate: David Blakesley j Re c idly to , Br City Pfaiine BB:gs i 01 0