Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1989/10/25 - Agenda Packet
�• � i o !r � � .. CA 1 CITY o+ f , V r RANCHG CUCI# PLANNING C F 13AYLV ( `i 1977 WEDNESDAT OCTOBEIi.`25,l096 7©0 p.m. 1 U0148 PARK COMMUNITY CENTER - 9161 BASE1"K RANCHO CU,CAMONGA,CALWORNIA . ' L Pledge of AllegZance,;; IL Rau Call Camsissioner Blakesle.y Cbamissioner NkNiel C rmissxoner`Mltiea Cbraalssloner Tolstoy,- , S.cfimu;x inner Vkinbergeie III. Annoumements IV., Approval of Minutes Adjourned Meeting of 6atober 5, ` 39 j October 11, 1969 Y. Coml ent C�?enclar The following`Consent Calendar items are expected to,be routine ands.- r non-controvks aL They will be'acted on by tT�e lCommissia i at one c time without discussion.. If anyone Ras conoei-,t Oyer any item,,it should be removed for discussion A. VAS ATIOIT OF KINLOCK AVENUE-TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP,, -i n685 --- request to vacate Rinlock Aven_uet located soutt, :of Devon Street to the north property luao of Tract'1204.6 approximately 60 fee:wide and 109 feet long. B. VACATIONti by A PORTION OF.JASPER STREET.-TENTATIVE RTACT12820 --Arequest tvacafL a portion of Jasper,Street, located south of I Cgh7ar.*Av?pue,atiproximately'13 feet wride and 130 feet long. +, ;,. i1 �2. " N ww4" VL Pt tl£e$eninp The fgiioayireg tterx4 ar3. ubtta.he¢rtngs in tahtch concerned.tndivtduais _ may votre their opiniOn of the related pi-olect. Please? watt to be recagn; cd'by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating Maur a►ame and ttridres p All stwh opintons shad be Itmite3d to 5 minutes er tnriivi p !�'It�I fa�`eac�c�ro%etw fy C:. ENVIRONMtNTAL' ASSESSMENT" AND GE�IERa3L MAN AMENDMENT 88si92C - 1:UTURE ESTATE, I.NCt! emend .fte C,cne :Plan Land Ilse Map ftam i3�xle � a Medium I?erisiFf I2csidenti (8-t4 dw elling i nits`perieir6 iat 3.556:ae es of land located j the,southeast earner of,Archibald Avenge and Church Street. °, 'ate, pity qgt :eisa consider Neighborhood hood and Low Medium Density Residential as appropriate alternative designations, ONt 28. (Coxztinued from qr 06r Xl,YQ&9i. + II I74 EN VIRdNMEMI AL A6SESSMENT ,AtI? DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT A�IIENDMENTti 89-04.- FUTURE, ESTATE INC A T» request to amend the De�elalstnertt Districts.Map from ;-Op'r (0ffi2e/Rrofegslanal) to T, 1Medium Density,'$14 dt+ielling'unitg per acre)&(', .556 acres of Ind Vacated at the"�+okh$ast corner c of Archibald-'A1�en►ze amd C,arch street. ,rne City Val also consider wC" weighborhocd z Commercial) and �iLMn (Law , Medium) as.appropriate aiteirnath�'districts. II1sN 1077-332- 2b. (Cantinued from October 11;18a.) E. EivVIRO MENT.L ASSESSMENT ANI?, GENERAL PLAN lilVlE�tI3MENT�;89,02A - B.t'I M, D'EVEAC�FMENT - A request. to. amend the,the,pe;ierat'Plan end tlse Ma ,.am lard Control to p '"". Medium l7e�tsity llesiaent161 (4-lf4 dwelling units per aere) for approximately 1119 acres of Iand"Boated on the west side of Carne iani Avenue, ea ;of the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Chandol, and south of Vivero Street - APN: 207-02244. (Continued from-ocjoba p fl,19t'H,) F. ENVIROINMEI41TAL ASSESSMENT , ANI) DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENl1fltIENT 87,22 �,E:G.M. DEVELOPMENT' A request to amend the Development Districts Map'from PioocF Control to Medium Density Residential 48-1.4 dwelling units per acre) for approyAmatei�* 3.78_acres of land located<on the west side of Carnellan Avenue, east of ti a Cucamonga Creek Flood `x Control Channel,and south of Vivero>StMet'-AP1 267-0ZZ-64, {Continued€flora October 32,2383 G. 'ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TE14TATNE TRACT 1�i263 E.G.M.. I3EYELOPMENT-A resirtentiai subdivision;and design, relriew of 32 aondominiunt'units on 3.35 acres of land in'the Niezlium Residential Dstrict.(8-I.4 dwelling units per acre}and the Flood Cat14ro1 Distriet (a proposed Medium Residential Distr et), Iocatp 4pn +era west-side of;Carnelian at V vero Street , A'PN: 207;422,S4 and 64. AsBociafed with this project is General k'lan tir' Amendm!nt 8342 A,Develo uient District Atnendrr ent 87-12 s 0�;: Tree Zerdaval'Permit 89-58. Cantin ed frirm tycta er.13�1460 j H. ENVIROA'MENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 2820-A. H. REITER DEVELOPMENT'-A;subdivision of 5�73 acres of land ` into 2 iparcels withine thIndustrial Park District, Subarea 6,and, the Haven Avenue Overlay District, located ;at the,:northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Trademark parkway North -,APN: 210-081-17 I. ENVIRONMENTAL AfSESSMENT AND VARIANCE 8311 - ' PAEOMBO -A request to eliminate the__a uir<.� car garage-by converting it into.at climate "controlled aft%va for med;cal 'reasons,fora single family residence'on.18 acres of land in''the Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre),Iocated at the southwest corner of Id®r.Street.and,La Ronda Street-APN: 202-323-27. J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83-17 - INLAND AREA FELLOWSHIP-- A request to_ establish a church in an existing.buiiding totaling 16,457 square ( feeton 2.42 acres of land in the Medium Residentia7 District(F 14 dwelling units per acre),located at the northwest corner of 15th Street W-A Amethyst Avenue APN: 201-474-02 and 03. K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT' AND TERRA VISTA- COMMUNITY PLAN A74ENDME T 88-01 - WESTERN PROPERTIES-A request( lhange various school,trail';and hark site designations to allo%,,che establishment of auto ser`fee stations and mini-waroho,"use`uses,sutject to,the Conditional Use Permit process, along major arterials; to delete a portion of Orchard Avenue; and to update the Landscape Design Guidelines and land use maps to reflect previous project approvals and "as- built",conditions=APA- 227-151-08,13,and 14;1077-421-01,16 acid 18;and 1077-091-36. L. MODIFICATIONS TO CONDITIONS ,,OF APPROVAL FOR / CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88-35 AND 'AACEL MAP 11838 W& F. DAVIDSON'ASSOCIATES. INC. - .A-request to. modify the • condition of approval requiring the undergrounding of utilities � along Base Llne..Road for the development of a•,shopping'center and related Pareei Map at,the northwest corner of Base Lin--Road f and Victoria Park Lane-APN; 227-11.1-28,34,and:5. it VEL Old Busziness M. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT.89-02 -POLO GROUNDS -A review of compliance of conditions of approval for an entertainment permit approved for Harry C's restaurant(presently Polo Grounds) located at 10877 Foothill Boulevard-APN: 208-352-10; (. VUL Director's Reports .: N. PROPOSED REVISIONS TO THE, GRADING STANDAR135 PCYIt;. TIIE ETIWANDA WORTH SPECIFIC PLAN Ix. CommWon Busfness' grsTte".Dtattt 'hiS't3 _the .t� and pines for,the general pu%t c to rtdi��;ass the '`' commWIon.>'An' to be,discussed.hefia are those which s.a already appe /ore'1`_ ages cF ' ` XI. Ad,�cxr�r�'u�art TYie i"Panntng coinnits4on has.adaisted Administrative Roc uiations;that -.. set an II:p.m. adjoid ment tints. if items go beyond tha,time, then, shall be heard o ty;Wiihthe.corsont of the.comm$sion. t .. f �, 1f a ,R. i -viciNITY" MAP , •�•.•w.+r.w.....a.,...,!' haw ..��..... ' r--i I 3 , u g f ciox PAA Or M414 a• s}.'a g •' ` a e ®.. . • - • ..� r•a•eawv ,t� ' .� of • O.p = . r 0.on• CLl® v i�• 3.. _ 40 . r^yi • cue..e oA•awsn fa'xn A IONAt ►Aaa ONTAAIO IxfYR.aAT(CalC i�p1MQAY �.'� Cffy OF R 1 r1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCA<MONGA S` OF REPORT DATE: October 25, 1989 To. Chairman,and Members'of the Planning C fission FROM: Shintu Bose, Deputy'City Engineer BY: Phil;I'Tp Verberd, Assistant Civil Engineer"' ' SUBJECT: VACATION 'OF KiNLOCK'AVENUE - TENTATIVE, PAKC_EL MAP 1168$L A request o vacate, n oc venue, locatedsou n Of! evon "reett to 'the north property.,?ine of Tract 12040', approximately 60 feet v+id : and 109 feet Tong: I. _ BACKGROUND/ANALYSISr On September 28, 1988, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution 'No. 88-197 approving Tentative. Parcel-Maly No.. 1I6'd5y 'located' on the south side of,Devon Street at Kinlock Avenue. Ore o9`L the` Engineering conditions is that appropriate street .sLmtmr,_, vacation proceedings bg completed for that'portion-of KinlceA Avenue south of Devon Street. i The subiect Kinlock Avelhio vacation is approximately SO feet wide and 109 feet longs The vacatt6h is consistent with the;Tentativa Parcel Map, the General Plan and thp�'Development Code. II. RECOMMENDATIOg Staff recommends tha\r, the Plaphing Commission make the' finding that tha vacation conforms with the; A-6haeral Plan and the Development Code. This finding wilt be forwarded, to the .City CQuncil for further processing and. final approval. Respectfully submitted, ,n Shintu Bose Deputy City Engineer SB:PY:sd Attachment: Exhibit "A" j I ITEM, "•'T'C,P05E'O . i/.9C'.�3'"'UN" QF Kl/V4.00K AVe, PTA= ;7,FN7..r�YB l t� ate' _/ C� ��" NU SCAGF D !/ON STrPE�r C DETAIL. I I ='OOM144 91.VO /NDA,4; ' OGNQ.gie'YOr t NA.M.oS,MIRE 5T Ni J L N SP F I [AlArRAD01W AWour"4r t:W1 VAC 47ION L _ 3142� 5E6 aEP,4/L A OMF k� :. A.716 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA *r " STAFF, REPORT- , ' DATE: October 25, 1989 r. TO: Chairman af+d Membevs of the Plot;nis,g"Con. Ission- FROM: Shintu Bose, Deputy City`Engfncner BY: Phillip Verbena, Rssistsnt CiVil Engineer SUBJECT VACATION OF A PORTION 9P JASPER .STREET A request to "vacate a 7portl on or Jasper Street, °oca a south Of Ri Ohl and' Avenge, approximately 13 feet wide and 136 feet long.;- Tentailive Tract No, 12820 L. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On December 9, 1987 id , the Planning Cssiurt adopted Resolution Ndo.'$7- 216, .:nd approved Ti►itative Tract Flap No. 1282o. "Asa result of the Plan„ Check process, it was determi`ned,,that a portion of Jaspper Street will` need t9 be vacated prior to recordation of the final map (Exhibit 119). r, The subSect street right-of-way vacation is ,approximately 13 f6,,st wide and.130 feet long and is located,sauth of Highiand. Avenue. The vacation is consistent with the General PI'W''and,the Developmegt code. II. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the plaoning Coamtissio'o make. the finding that the i streoo vacation confoMs with: the, General Plan. This finding ;will be II forwarded to the City,,Council for further, processing and final approval.` Respectfully submittUd, Shintu Bose Deputy City Engineer SB:PV:dlw Attachment: Exhibi v ITEM B v it -4C•,4r1O1 ®F•,q AMF7/0ff of J,asPE sr�� r • 7"a T no vamt I1 S zotis. 7-Iquou. 2.11, M.4Cr.laV7 TE/YrWIV� q 71W Cr/PSR47 SASY S r-feAAFr WC47401V ' I I E0974/1- HERSON NO 0,41,414e � � PRo��o��w•� RANT� I • rm 3708 "m 74/►a ZO?i� R•1.8SDp sk L 7 j r SiV*f+°7 96?"0' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE. October 25, 1989 TO., Chairman and Members of the Planning Coamiss.ion >• ;' FRM: Crad Butter, Gity P1'annar ' BY: Alan darren, Associate planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN .AMENDMENT NO. 89- OP S c, NC. R request o amend the Hera Plan . an se map , ram Off Ice to, Medium Q'ynsity Residential C$�14; dwelling units per acre) for 3.556 acres of land iodated at the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Church Street`. The City will also consider Neighborhood Commercial and >Low> M,dium Density Residential as alternative designations'- APNI. 1677.332-26. (Continued from October, 11, 1989) ENVIRONMENTAL MRIESSKENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT,AMENDMENT N . 9-0 - E - request oamen e DevelopmentDistrict�map from P (office/Professional) to "M" (Medium Density, 8-14 &selling units per acre), f- I 35o`ar-. ".y acres of Iand located at the southeast corner off .AztAald Avenue and Church Street`.. The City will also consider "NC" (Neighborhood Commercial) and 1IL411 (Low ,Meiiium) '' as alternative districts - APN. 1D77-332.4& (Continued from;. October 11, 1989) I. BACKGROUND: The public hea�,ing:on these items was continued from tfie, ctgoi-r 21th, meeting at :the request of the applicant. This: request toss made to allow the � p�licant.time-aeo develop potential mitigation_agreements with the 1, ;meted school `districts. II. DISCUSSION At the writing. C'f this report, .no agreements to n -m tigation of the pottential school impacts have been forwarded to staff although '°the Central School District was scheduled to review a proposed agreement at its Board meeting of` October 18, 1989.'` Staff will inform the Planning Commission of the .stat6s of the developer/school district Vreercents with an oral report at the public meeting. If agreements with both Central and Chaffey Districts have been executed,` it- wou.14 then be possible to. recemMend the issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the pro$ect and then consider, approval of the land use amendment as ` requested. � 4 4 l ITEMS C & a PLANNING COMMISSION' STAFF REPORT n RE: GPA 89,02C 4 ODA 89-04 il7llRE Ef7A71, INC. October 25, 19" Page 2 In addition,: the Planning Commission r,6quested staff �ra'report on density ranges for the developed multi-family projects a;toi,the sc0th 1 and east of the site. The apartment complex to t5etZsouth 5as recently been approved for a Seven unit addition which will bring its density to .i3.1.3 uhiWacre. The nearby:Marlboro project was developed at a 10.6 unit/acre density, III. RECOMMENDATION: Because of the potential negative iMpact to school servi5_S1__SfSff rncommeris that after the public :hearing; the Planning Commission should consider the Following options: A. If signed school impaction mitigatibh agreements.far both'' Central and Chaffey ;Districts are presented at the meeting, it would be appropriate for the Planning Commission to recommend approval of a Mitigated Negative Declaration, It would then be possible for the Commission 'to recormmend approval of General Plan Amendment 89-02C and -Development.District Amendment 89- 8. If signed' school impaction, mitigation agreement?"Jor both Central and Chaffey Districts are not oeesenC4 at the meeting, the Commission should-consider the following; 1u If testimony is given indicating procedural-delays have resulted in an inab lt�,y, to have the agreements executed and there is'good reason to assume that they will be finalized in .the near future, 'then the Commission may wish to continue the items to the next meeting, 2 If testimony .is given which indicates :that`,there are substantial differences between the applvc,ant and school elistr ct(s), r6gardln the provi '^ ;of the agregment(s), then the Commission olay witn` to-7., consider denying :the application, without prejudice, based on _ccnmitigatable school service iIVacts Res' t l yr s e , Brad �- City, P1 otter 88•AW;ko Attachments; October 11, 1989 Plann4ij Comission Staff Report GPA84-OZC Resolution of Approval ODA 89-04 Resolution of Approval GPASO-02C Resolution of Denial ODA 89-04 Resolution of Denial PLANN166 C0W3SS1ON STAFF RERORT E: GPA a9-02C & DOA 89-04 - FUTURt ESTATj�� INC. October 25, 1989 . Page 3�` tv Attachments: October 11, 1989 Planning Commission $taff 'Report. GPA99-02G.�esolution of Approval DRA 89-04 Resolution of Approval .. . QPA89-02C. Resolution of Denial j n UA 89-44' Rd�ol-ution"of Denial } u _ �r t it 10 fd�.sx rcJ1 CITY OF RASCHO C11G'-�01`IGA i DATE: Oct Der 11, 1984 T0: Chairman and Membe.,+srdf the Planning Comrriss-ion `J FROM: arad Buller, City Planner BY: Larry Henderson, P,rinci'pal Manner Alan Warren, Associate ;Planner. SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL As AND 'GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 89- 02C - FUTURE 1£STATE. INC.- q request to amend the General Plan Land Use,-: Map from Office to Medium density residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) for 4556 acres of land located at the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Church Street. The City" will also consider Neighborhood Commercial and Low Medium density residential as alternative designations. APN:! 1077-332-26 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 89-04 - FUTURE ESFATE "iNG, A request to amend the Development District Map from "OP" (Office/Professional) to "M" (Medium density, 8-14 dwelling units per acre)_ for 3.556 ' acres of land located at the southeast"corner', of Archibald Avenue and Church Street. The City will also consider- 'INC" (Neighborhood Commercial) and "LM" (Low Medium) as alternative districts. APN: I077-332-26. i C I, PROJECT ANC--,SITE DESCRIPTION: [,. A. Surrounding tand Use and Zoning, i North - Single family residential; (developed below allowable-unit density), church; Low Density East Residential condominiums; Medium Density South - Residential apartments, Vacant.; Medium Density Best - Single family residential; Low Density B. General Plan Des Project Site - Office North - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling emits per acre) South - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre)' West - Cow Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) t�FY E�f 4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 89-02C, DDA 89-04 - FUTURE FSTATE,_INC. October 11, 1989. Page 2 C. Site Characteristics: The site is currently vacant and the land slopes to the southeast with ,a I to 2 percent overall grade. Several .elevation changes occur, with sloped bank conditions of c to 3 feet high on the site- There is no = ,evidence-of erosion or unstable soil Ve stazion::cansis*s. cf native grasses and weeds with no trees existing on the site.: There are no cultural, historic or special scenic aspects"to ` the site;, II. ENVIRONMENTAL. ASSESSMENT: Staff has reviewed the Initial. Study, Part I, and the responses from the school districts and completed the Environmental Checklist, Part 11 of the Initial Study,.and, except for school impaction, ha4 found that no other significant G adverse environmental: impact,:!�.vtil: occur as a result of the proposed General Plan Amendment 89-02C and Development District Amendment 89-04. Roth the Chaffey High School and Central School Districts have indicated that there will be significant negative impact on their ability to provide'services as a result of the ,proposed amendments, and_planned residential project'. The following students can be expected,, based on generation rate =Upplied by the districts, from an anticirated 40-unit project at the site: ratee students students/unit x units ,generated Chaffey High School: Dist. .15 40 6 Central School Dist. .75 40 30 TOTAL 36 District-wide enrollment figures are shown in Exhibit "D". In response to this concern, staff had requested that the applicant work with the school districts towards developing agreements to provide =2ppraipriate mitigation measures..,., The Chaffey Joint union High School'Distwict has stated a willingness to work out such an agreement 'with the applicar.t As of the writing of this report staff Is in contact with the Central School' District which is considering what form such ^n agreement might take, but the district has not yet formally indicated that an agreement is the solution to mitigate their ,potential impacts. Therefore, as adeqv,.te mitigation toward resolution- of potential: significant impacts has not been reached, staff is enable to ,make G the determination in favor of preparation of a. iegative Declaration, Cie r, PLANNING COM.MISSICN STAFF REPORT GPA 89426, bDA 8944 - FUTURE ESTATE, INC. 06toberl , 19$9 :,. Page '. r: ITT. LAND USE'ANALYSIS: a A. Aporooriate6ess of the 6xistir"C" unffice" '4AZI nation s tos bardered. an...the north b.� a secondary arterial (Church Stre<,;�,,and on the west,by'Are-hi'bald Avenue, a.,major arterial with traffic volumes An exrns-3 M1; 22500 vehicle trips a day at the intersection. The intierior lot sines abut>Medium ' � multi-family'lapd uses. Generally, the location of offices. adjacent 'to mu1`i-fdmiIy, , units is an accF table land use relationship when the offices, form a buffer f0 m the: noise arid. activity of the arterial streets. Offices are viewed as only a m. htl, more fates e land use than multi-family i, resMegtiaj and therefore compatible to each Other,when iporopr,iai�:buffer ng techniques are employed when develapedr The Deve]opm6 Cade further states that, "Site de-velopment �; a:.n Ards are APsigned to make- such uses (in the 'OPt distric li relatfively-compatib.Te with resi;!ential trs�sG" 1, ,.., T he issue of:dispersed office sites wad r ied rate in 1986 by f; .he City Council, As a result, a G�ngral Plan Amendr�er�t° application (GPA 864A) was 1 .2t aced b3+ the City Council to change the Land use Category for ,this site" to Medium A Residential. At the public hewing, a representative of the ;± property ,owner spore against the promised change, and the, PIannin9 Commi.ssian ;Decor Bided der?.ial of the amendment, . the City 'auncil` ::ipheld the recommendation.t,Of .the PlaniAing: Commission'and the Office desirrlaUion,remained or, the si M1t Thy, General Plan states, ho sir, "The,intent 01`t;Js land use category (Office/Professional) is to pr6verst the proliferation of individual isolated :Office$." Since the o,losest commercial fice area to this site is about 1/4 n,V � to ths, south (see Exhibit "A°). 'the above me,.,j red;Ganera-� provYson is not evident with., tt`! existing office j' designation`, 8. Apprbrriateness of multi-family 11ses it the area4- The close proximity of existng sang2e family and multi,(family uses prevents no, -inherit land use co'nfliCts far ttrh3 proposal, '". Thrrre are 64 units in the apartment complex bordering -this' . - ,` site on the souttr, multiple family condominiums to the east,.` ti and primarily single family residents to;tf!e north and-west., , f l- � Y Vv PLANNING COKMISSIOR STAFF REPORT CPA 89-02C,,rPDA 89-04t Ft17'URE ESTATE, It1C. � �' fsctcoer lI,`1:n89 Page 4 i t : "ece,itly the City Council "eupressed concern regarding" the increase :in mul'iTfamily devaIopstents. Miter reviewing a study which prediLied a 65. percent single familyl35 percent " multi family. housing mix at bi:ildceuC, members of.the Couhcij determined that a goal of 75."y ercani C2� percent mix uoulcl be. `Y more appropriate, to maintain,: �, "predominately:singlo family ` :. community character, "Approval,.,-f 61si, appl i.caticn woulu�Ce a land use change in conflict`.with'this ,goat. To, put the proposed "change of 3.556 acres'"'to t�:%diup multi- family development in perspective with the, City as a 4ghole} this amendmet,_=-uTd scp;�s�ert;s .43 percent increase in the multifamily 35, percent Socrease '(based,-on a tot';q ,of 44 units'at 75.'percent, of development "range) ,r•` Multi-family'., units at ?�uildout.. The a.actment of the proposal therefore, would not.present a significalt increase in- the multi-family development within the community. C. Conformance with the General Plan and Development Code - The '^ hiedI ,,,e6sity 8-14 dwelling :units per, acres classification allows a wide range of living accommodations ranging `from conventional single family units and .mobile homes to ,'�QusPs. inter!sity' at- the lower end of the .medium density " ra,k,,, 4uld be .appropriate adjacent to Low rand Very ;Lot;; densrty`rosidential areas and the housing tjpes common to this' Lower end' of the range wbu'r"d likely be characterjzed by detached 1n9le family. housing units; Building intensity at the mid or, higher env of the;, range may be 'more"appropriate along tratsi.t routes and "major and secondary thoroughfares, and near •activity centers, Development at this: level' of intensity'vould normally, be. semi-detached or° attach units, Medium density residential alto serves as ,a buffer between low dens,,, residential areas and higher density, 'coMmercial Activities and areas of greater traffic and noise levels., The,locazdgn ol�PMAdium density residential at this site would l not exhibit any 'land use confiicts with existing Gen6i�a1 plan provisions:. ti- ='I b" pLAIYNING EQNfMISSIdN STRFk` FpORT GPA 89-02G, i7DA 89-04 = FUtbRE ESTATE, IPiC. October 11, 1989 lame`5 1 Cansideratz'.,,ti of altrrnative desigt,ataaas To ,provide the commission with alternatives to UI exisi;' ng and proposed designations, staff has included azt analysis of categories similarIin character�:-`to those under di.scuss7on, For this purpose, staff "brack':ted" the land uses with higher intensity on the.office side and 'low intensity on the residential side as follows: General Plan - Neighborhood Corg4rcial Development %ode NV N'ighborhood Commercial} This categorir includes shopping, centers, a;jd convenience commercial clusterl that provide essential retail goods and. , services to residepts in the immediate aria The neveloorient "intended� Code standards are "iended to make'such uses compatible'tn and harmonious ' wztti' the character ,of. the 'surroundn residential ar Tess intense land use a`i^ea," Because of the j limited size of the subject property' a major tenant like•'a super market would probably not be feas 41e therefore, a Lo!rneercial designation 'would laad' to the development of a convenience type strip: center. Since 'there is a�.j major commercial area just 114 mile to the south on Foothill Blvd.,staff does not_, beiieae�there is a need for a, neighborhood commercialdev"elbpment Est this :site. General Flan - Low-Radium 4-8: ;dwelling units per acre 3' Development Code - "LW' (Low-Medium 4-8 dwelling unite per I acre) The General Plan states,, "the 'Low-Red%um category is characterized by residential densities' somewhat lower than the' Medium density ,roup. The housing types permitted. at the 4-8 dwelling units per acre include typical single fainily, single f amity. zeta lot line, duplex and udder certaia.�conditions':up to 4-G townhouse type units:. This categd'ry would be appropriate within low density areas to encourage; greater housing diversity,without chanaing the single,farnlly.character of the sur"ounding res de tial area". The designation of the site to `4A" instead of "W' would reduce` the 'maximum potential ` unit count from,49 to '28, The'charact er of the' ,Yesidential portion of the block on which the site is located has been established as Medium by the " General plan and DeveiopmentCode. Therefore, if the Site is deamed acceptable, for residential uses, it Mould seem appropriate to continue`;the Medium density character of the abutting area to the_so.uth„ PCr1iIVING COPMISSION STArF "REPORTf SPA 89 02c, DDA 894t FUTURE ESTATE, INC, October 11, i984 1 Page 6 f4 If the Planning. Commission believes (`"her of these " Alternative designations is more appropriate, , a final determination should be withheld urktil'istaff can provi�fe' an environmental'Analysii"'for the Preferred alternative.. IV. FACTS FOR FINpING'S: Baseif'on the' facts' and conc►ilsians lis%eit above; staff believes the Planning Commission., can make the findings.,regarding general Plan, Development, Code, and land use provisions favorable to this application as folios: 1. The property, is suitable for the uses permitted In'the propo ed land use and. development district` designazien in terms of access and` size as evidencee by the site ` exce4ding ;ache 'ty's, minimum lot size requirements,-sand eompatibii t; ►ith�exieting surrounding land uses by the site befrj bgrdered on the, east and, south by parcels with the Sa,-vu land use designations, .and � 2. `rye proposed amendments are in cnniori n4e with 'the f General ' Plan and Development Code due to the ,site's capacity, to pro note the , goals and objectives' .for residential development, � �. However, because, of the `potential: unt tigated school services ' impact mentionedby the: Central Sci�ooi District, staff does not believe a favorable'environmental impaet.`statement c6n.be made for approval of tip amendment, V. CORRESi NCE: These `Meets have been advertised as a publ ic. l hearing in the The D� ai1Y_ a ort newspaper' the ;property pasted, and notices stint t�o- al2 F perty owners..within 300 feet of the Project site. VI. RECOMMENDATION Because of the school ;services impact issue, '- staff believes the following determinations should be�lconsidered by the Planning:Convnis;ion: A. That the General Alan and Development District Amendments be denie,'.ba.std upon:no definitive mitigation measures available for impleicentatio„ of th6 school, impact issue at this time, If the Commission favors this option, staff would recommend that the denial' be "without prejudice" so that the applicant could reapply at anytime if a mitigation measure solution is, found; or n PLANNING COMMiSSION STAFF REPORT GPA 89=02C, IDDA 89-04 -, FUTURE eSSATE, INC. $ti' October Ili, 1989 A` 4 a� Page 7 C Thai the General. Plan- ,and Development District Amendments' -be continued until a more definitive AV' agreement arra,oge!men't' i presence w1ich clarifies the, 7 mitigation measures, on the school impact issue ,(the fy-'• Central School District apprears to be will to warp, on a solutjon with the applicant and. City); or C. That the. Plann:.xzg Commission determine that "the. F potential impact,. 4am the land use change; : wf approximately 36 additi n$i students (elementary and jt high school) is not sufficient to reslt in a s significant effect on school >`ser4ices. With such a determination the Planning Commission' can recommend a Negative Declaration and'then consider'approving the GPA and JDA applications. Re fully's tted, { Br Ile City Planner BB:AW:js Attachments: Exhibit W - GeneralL Plan and" Development District Location Mips Exhibit "B" >.Site Map Exhibit,"C" Site PIan Exhibit I D" - School Enrallment'l gums, Exhibit 'E" - Letter' from Ct4ffey Joint Union Nigh School Dist-.(ct Exhibit "F" Letter-from Central -School Dj{strict .t T� r $ �` �1Ma�- � �pro � � {��,, ��€� i }..; :t .1 ''.� 'z f��,1•� +WA If,_ t t� ePlis�t 94 t� sa� tg i"l d�� \•�F�± S i t n a�it!! r J td. � +r. ' w ® a t Af �nnanv a'ivai�av i CITY:OI~ NCHO �1UCAMONGA 1'T'W: GOA1 ak:9240:wA ss-ca PLANNING€!.VISION j PreftmakoStis Iie.a. rEXHIBM SCALE o. Low er Lid .GSA► O� fl��� ...., • *..� — — _ • w e° a d499dI511i1 •ea .rr x General plan Map 77 S o oee-a-•. � e : • B ••see °• •• •• se{ ,: . e a e e o 6 e s e o e• • °'S ee••, eeeees�ee♦ eye S••°e: S 'r C A •.- / i K.. L�UN I![Yl LM OP NCAshk O LM L Development 01strici • Mapt I • t t ' FC r i lj 17 CITY OF-It :—GPA 869-02c,ODA 80-04 PLANNING D". ION TME. Nd h � EXHIBIT. °p,•' SCALE: rT�C'. ° LOW 4 DU �k15TE+ :. UM s oeun a.a r c o.sa6t al4URLN e 9 6 Q3 N ®le ®w je�° P,Y$i� VtS'('i.!y = j �Y.. V�Ti V I— Y b�..9U�T� ♦ A'�.0 c�M iP«� 141 Xv e" me Gat V41MOT Ixl,�fr�.. p�pWIAL {rYFrneJ �L8 M1 Am 17. • 6f iY to e.a 'l" TLE PRonCT Ho. A�Hs�D/Cku96N i Tf�wN fir s 89OZI/0 APPLICANT 7711 C HIM A1a., sra r2so #4Ut4TIHGTol4 P946HO PA. 9 z ? °:. C:IT'Y ?F F�Ai1T CD UCAh�It?lOiG TT ►ii: � :DDT to I'LMNIIdG'D . I T�7ISON TfT`LF-: aAtDDA Site dft� � f DISTRICT 'WIDE SCHOOL'ENR6' LMENT•,,FICURES / for ombined GPA`s 85•-024 r_- `D NEW -STUMUT$ CURRENT CAPACITY ' GPA 89- 2 AK OF ,TOTAL DISTRICT 8NROLLMEN ,'F'ERMA1di NT R1 2A Z 020 ENROLLMENTS Central 4281 2512 , 42633Y 24 .5 30 .T 1.3 Chaftey 4620 3800 4520+ 5 .09 6 :1 .2 1 as generated by the anticipat_..-:=,"-sntial project on the sites i. of the GPA"s_ 2 % of current enrollment-district wile 3 figures rrom City Master Environmental Assessment=1988 I ;T ill k ` CITY ®F TANCf30-'CL7CAM0NQA rrEM:` $"29;MA e9-04 PLAN IING`DIVISION SC64�al.ENROL T FIQ �' N EXHIBU. SCALE: G affey Joint Ldton High'FSchoot .o,,,.I ct 2t1 WEST FIFTH STREET.ONTARIO.CALIFORNIA 91762t698 •'(7tdj'$R6.65tt :SUPERIN4ENOSNT OF SCHOOLS t$SDCUITE:SUPERNTENDENT BOARU MEMSERS Dean Eo nvllr-&A INSTRUCTION- Kathleen E KinteT s 69t1e%HOMAM Elm C`"a, ++IM ASSISTANT:SUPERINTENDENT Flarinond I Satra Pr'FfSONNEI Chanas.J Uhattey 1ckt E.Culp - Gerald Y's1YOI August 17, 1980 ►T, l s• ta« ttf}(I M.d t Williams chits,0ts,"fnc: it I, z I ti . �t 278 N Second Ave.: Jf+ # ='i 4 +' .•rlSir3}t3. :... ..• U and* CA 91TZR � a ATTN: Kent Wu � RE: Archibald/Church 7ownhom6& i With reference to ttte :A:ity's four questions in their letter of August B. 1989 to you: i. Yes, yio4,V'pro ect will impact the Chaffs<.ui strict's I ability to pro0,de adequate service 'to t1s,) residents of the the district. "lhe Chaffey iistrict willjrable to pravid'e AMik adequate service when Rancho Cucamonga High" pool is com- plated. 'r e.; The Chaffey District uses a generation factor of Students per unit. a. The Chaffey District currently has trailer classrooms at Etiwanda HigW)'J'chool. T'has,;',istrict ai,�u;currently is in expansion construction at Etiwanda Nigh school. It is funded by the State. The District plans to construct Rancho Cucamonga Higrs-School--(RCHtl) to opan either in 1991 or 1992,E Oepondinq.on funning. The funding for RIMS will b4 from the State' and/or Mello-Roos funding and/or developer 1 l*` fees. The District plans' .*D"build another high school in, €: Rancho Cucamonga, to apeii in 19g4 or 1a45, also to be fund- ea by the State and/or fella-Roos and/ar developer fees. 4. Yes, the Chaffey District does have a comprehensive master,plan. It reflects t1he population growth of the Dist:rfct, construction of ,the two above-mentioned high schools in Rancho Cucamonga, 'construction of another high school in south Ontario, and niscollaisous improvements of othar facilities. 1 $QNpOd.S: ALTALQUA tr CNAFk£Y An`ULT�DuCAPQN CKOPSY-£h+YANDA.UONTCtAM ONTARIG a VALLEY VIEW_ ., .. u 1.4 Willians Architects. August ll, T989 Archibald/Church Townhr^es Because the schools'in the Chaffey District are. impacted, and becausa state fundingAs.sauncertain, the Chaffey District r-scomme'nds that;the City require developers to enter into a mitigation agreement with the D"tri"ct.' I'belieae you,have a draft of that agree nt. If you wish to discuss�;this matter fur— they, please call. ` ' ti sincerely, STEPHEN L. BUTTERS ` i Director ' r Business Services , SLB/sb cc: Alan Warren, City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 , 2 r; ADIv WIS'TRAIIGN entr I School District ErwimN.Jon" `tturiCee r rszcncacarr 9457 foothill Blvd:/ Rancho Cucamonga,California:,917301(714)989-8541 Iage3ti Vogel wQBT.iuP' .#Burl"Cox Sbarom I—Nagel Astr.auwr.,rt+sxwucrroH August 22, 1989' Fir. Kent ,•it, AIA r Williams Architects, Inc. ! 276 North. Second Avenue Upland, CA 91786 Dear Mr. Wu: In response to your August 10, 1989 letter, I am providing you with the information you renuested concerning the impact of your Archibald/Church 40 townhome project. You asked for answers to four questiOns, Question fl: will your project impact the school districts ability to provtde adequate service to the residents Of the districts? If so, under what conditions can the districts provide aacquate s4rvice? Response: Yes.-- your project will lturther overcrowd an already ovarcrowded school. We can provide adequate service if.we had additional classroom space. Question 12: What is the f student generation factor(s) ich tha districts use for determining the numher;rof students expected from yourr project?, Response: The student gendration factor used by the district is ,7562 per unit. Question 63: Do.the school districts have plans for portable classrooms or to construct additional sc3taol facilities to handle the increased student enrollments? f If so, what is the projected time frame and funding sources? h Responses We have Aorta;ie classrooms on every site in the school district to handle the dyer increasing stvdant enrollment. ' We are presently completing the third and final phase of Sear Gulch 7 School. We are currently working on, State applications for tyres additional :schools:-- Terra,Vista 11 for 1991, Ruth Musser Middle, School .:or 1992, and t6e'Coyote Canyon Elementary School for 199'to replace the temporary school built by Lewis Homes. The foit4ing source able x is the Stags of California and at present. no funds are avail , However, we hope to be funded if the voters approve a school building bond issue at the next election. SOAAD of TRoSI"S Henry L.StoY Antonia L4 Roges Noble Baler Ruhr A.Mauer Andrew Tartar „ PreitAent c("k N'emb" �-� Ct� ,p or1-7 at6m6er .AkmDrr Mr. Kent Wu, A2A Page Two 8/22/89 r Question #4: Do the districts have a comprahens ve master plan or S.r,*ear action qw plan? if so, what do they entail? Responses Yes:, we do have a comprehensive master pion and our S-year,action plan is described in Response #$ above. 3 trust this is an adequate response to your concerns. Sincerely, Ingrid Voge. Assistant Superintendent, Busine" Services ii - " y - 1 RESOLUTION NO, AML A 'RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALI'FORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN .AMENDMENT 89-02C REgUESTING TO AMCT, THE GENERAL PLAN iANR USE MAP FROM "OFFICE" TO "MEDIUM" DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS NA' ACRE) FOR 3.556 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AIM CHURCH STREET, RANCHn r11CAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AND t+tAKING FINDINGS IN SUPF EHEREOF - APN: 1077-332-26. A. Recitals. (i) Future Estate, Inca has filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. 8942C as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, th(si!pubject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application". (ii) On September 27, . 1039, and continued to 4;:toher 11 and October 25, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of >R��ho.Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing an the application, (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. AWL B. Resolution. NOW, THE^EFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Comnissio" of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. -This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts I set forth in Recitals, Part '"A", of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Basell upon substantial evidence presented to this Commissicn during :he above-referenced public hearinq on September 27, 1989, and continued to October 11 and October 25, '1959, including written and oral :staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission Hereby specifically finds as follows:_ (a) The application applies to approximately 3.559 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located at the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Church Street and is presently vacant, Said, property Is currently designated as "Office"; atxi (b) The property to, the north of the subject site is designated Low Density Residential ' and is developed with single family residential and a ciurch. The property to the west 'is designated Low Density Residential and is developed with single family residential. The property to the, east is designated' Medium Density Reidential'' avid- is developed with residential condominiums. The property to the south is designated fiediva Density Residential and is developed with residential apartments and portion_ 4 is undeveloped. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOIUTION NQ�. � GPA 89-02C" 4 FUIVRE ESTATE, INC. 0�tober 25, 1985 j � (c) This amendment does not conflict with. the hand Use Policio: of the general Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a' manner consistgrl% with the C-eneral Pi an aq with related development; and (d) This amendff*ent noes promote "the goal, and objectives of the land Use Element;",and (e) This amendment would not be -.nttetrially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties and i:Af, issuance of a Negative.Declaration is recommended. . 3. Based upon the substantial evidence, pr+esented'-,r this Coon ission during the above-referenced ,public h }rirws and. upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2� above, th".s Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows; (a) That the subject property, is suitable Tv`r . ,uses permitted in the proposed land use designat ion' n terms of jic cess,, sii , -as evidenced by the site exceeding the City's:minimum lot size requirements, and compatibility with existing surrounding is: d uses by the site being bordered on the east and south by parcels of land Width the same hand use designation;, and (b) that the proposed j amehdment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surjcounding properties:4s evidenced by the conclusions , and findings of the Initial Enviranmentei` Study; and the implementation of miti8ation agreements between the property owner(s) wnd the Chaffey Joint Union .Rgh Schoo? District and Central Schoo'i Oistrict; and (c) Thzt the ,proposed ameniment is in (.conformance with the General Plan and Development Code due to .the site's capacity to promote the. goals and objectives for residential development. 4. This ''oamission hereby finds that the project has been ;reviewed and considered in cowliaoce with the California Environmental Quality;,Act o-e 1970 and, farther., this Commission hereby recommends issuance of a 'Negative Oeclaration. F 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hamby ►V?solves that pursuant to section i MO to 65855 sr' the California Government:Code, that the, planning Cowdssion, al the City of Rancho Cucamio ja hereby recommends approval on the 25th day of, October, 1989, of General Plan Amendment tto.:89-O2C. 6. The Secretary to this '.Coaaaission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. t4 "t _ yA, ,?LAN41NG COMMUSION-RESOLUTION NO GPA .E9-02C I FUTURE ESTATE, INC, October 25, 1989 Page 3 APPROVED AND PLOPTED TkIIS 2STH GO OF OCTOBER, 19M PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANG O CUCPMONGA ay" Larry T. M .l ie I Chairmw r ATTEST: Brad Bu er, ecretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of they City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that ,tbor foytgoing Resolution was: fitly and regularly-Sntroduced, passed, and adopW,sky,,wl Planning CoMiSSion of the Lity of Rancho Cucamonga,•at a regular meetinj,sof the,'Plannir�g Commission held on the 25t!� day of October;, 1989, h the,follow4ng vote-to wits, ; i AYES: COn•M:SSIONER,Ss NOES: COMMISSIONER Ss ABSENT: C0MISSIONERS, die r + '� A� RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF :THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 8.9-04, R.EQUESTIliG TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS ' MAP FROM "OP" (OFFICE✓PROFESSIONAL'} TO "M" (MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL, 8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 3 5% ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST';CORKER OF,ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND CHURCH: STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ; AND MA:`.hc, FINDINGS, IN SUPPORT 111EREOF - APN. 1077-312-26. A. Recitals. (i) Future Estate, Inc., hats filed an application for Development District Amendment No. 89-04 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, ;the 'subject Development District Amen&ent is referred to as "the application". (ii) On September 27,`19.89, and continued to October it and October 25, 1989, the Planning Commission of the ICity of (Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed Public hearing on the application and issued Resolution No. recommending to the City Council that the associated General Plan Amendnint No.`89-02C be approved. ' (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this '"Resolution have occurred. S. Resolution.; NOW; THEREFORE, it is hereby found., determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of, the City of Rancho Cucamiringa as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in. Recitals, Part "A". of this Resolution are true and cgrrect. I 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to-this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing; on September 27, '1989; and continued to October 11 and October 25, 19890 including writtt.n and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Comitis ,„ -F reby.,specificaRly, finds as follows:' (a) The application applies to approximately 3.55E acres of lard, basically a rectangular configuration, located, at the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Church Street and is presently vacant. Said pror-sirty. is currently designated as "OP" (Office/Professional); and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is. designated %!' (Lori Residential„24 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with single family residences and a church. The property to the west is designated "L" (Low Residential, 2-4 dva'llirig units per acre) and is,'developed with single' family •residences. -property to the east is designated' "Pt" . O'® PLANNING COMMISSION RM. LUTION NO. ODA 89-04 - FUTURE ESTATE, INC. October 25,-1989 ' Peg e;2 (Medium Residential, 8-14 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with residential condominiums. The property to the south is designated "M" (Medium Residential', 8-14 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with residential apartments and is partially undeveloped. (c) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the Ger;!ral Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a 'manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development and (d) This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and (s) This amendment would not be materially injurious or. detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties and that issuance of a negative Declaration is recommended'.. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to t his, Commission during the above-referenced public hearings and upon' the specific: findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby,finds and concludes as follows (a) That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in they proposed development district in terms of access, size, as evidenced by the site exceeding. the City's minimum lot size requiremento, and compatibility with existing surrounding lard uses by the site being bordered' on the east and south by parcels of land with the same land use designation; and (b) That the proposed :amendment would not have significant impacts on the znvironment nor the surrounding properties as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Initial Environm. ntal Study; and the implementation of mitigation agreements between the property owner and the. Chaffey Joint Union High;School District and the Central School District; and (c) That the proposed aFend ent is In conformance with the General Plin and Development Code due to the site's capacity to promote the goals and objectives for residential development. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,. 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of tho C?lifornia Goverment Cede, that the Planning_fomission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga t hereby'recommends Iapproval on the 25th day of October, 1989, of General.Plan Amendront No. 89-04. f PLANNING.COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO DDA 89-04 - FUTURE,ESTATE,<XNCM $' \ October 25, 19$9'„ `r Page 3 6,. The Secretary tq,this Commission-shall .certify ,to the a4tion of this Resolution. ; 4 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 95TH U.F%".L OF OCTOBER 1989.'. rr_ PLANNING COMISSION . THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAaNONGA BY. Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad.Bvl.ler, ,ecr tart' 1, Brad Buller, 'ajec:ratary of the Planning Commission of the.Cfiy of Rancho-, Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foreg i,6g Resolution 'was duly and regularly introduced, ,passed; and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at i`,regular meeting of the Planning Commission held an the 25 sh day of'October, 19 by the following vote-to-w°lt: AYES: COWISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMt9ISSIONHRS: j c r. F. „� itihul RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION 0F;(THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,')CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING_DENIAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 8942C REQUESTING TO AMEND THE dENERAL .PLAN, LAND USE MAP FROM "OFFICE" TO "MEDIUM" DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLT'.;d UNITS' PEP. ACRE) FOR 3.556 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT'THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARCAIBALD AVENUE AND CHUK'4' STREET, RANCHO CUCAMON(iA„� CALIFORNIA` -'AND -MAKlr{G r!1.ND NGS IN' SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-332-26 A. Recitals. M Future Estate, Inc, has filed an application for General Plan Amendment No., 89-N C as described in 'the title of :this Resolution. Hereinafter in this resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred . to as "the application". (ii) ' 06 September 27, 1989, and continued to October 11 and October 25, 1989, the Al'anning >Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed,public hearing on the application, ,' (iii) Al legal pr. vquisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW' THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the' City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows- 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in Recitals,, Part "A"', of this Resolution are true,,and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence, presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public ;hearing on September 27, .1989, and continued to October 11 and October 25.. 1989, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby .specifically finds as follows: (a) '` The application applies to approximately, 3.556 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, i`ocated at the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Church Street and is presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as "Office''; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Density 'Residential and is developed with single family residential and a church. The property to the west is designated Low Density Residential and is developed with single family residential. The property to the east is designated Medium Density Residential, and is developed :With residential condominiums. The property to the south is designated Medium Density Residential and is developed With residential apartments and a portion is undeveloped; and �ep r ,, PLANNING COMMfSSItiN RESOLUTIQN NO. GPA 89-02C - FUTURE ESTATE, INC. DENIAL October 25, 1989 Page 2. ` (c) This amendment wool,! have a significant impact on the Chaffe,y -Joint Union Nigh School and Ceh,tral School Districts' ability to provide adequate service.to the residents of the area, as.evidpnced by the fact that an approlriate rrtit•igation agreement has not been reached between the ' property owner and he Districts. 3, Basl'i8 upon the substan a1 evidence`s presented to this Commission during the above referenced public=nearinns and"Upon the,,specific findings.of J facts set forth in paragraph„s -r and'2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concTudes as follows, . (a That theproposed- amendment would have significant impacts on the School Aistric,Ms' ability to provide service to the residents area. of the 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has 'bean reviewed and considered in compliance.with,the California Environmental .Quality :Act of 1970 end,. further, this Commission hereby recommends against the: issuance of a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in, paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Section ' 65850 to=65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City, of Rancho Cucamonga'hereby recommends denial without prejudice on the 25th day of October, 1989, of General Plan Amendment No. 89-02C. b. The Secretary ,to this"Commission shall certify to the adoption. of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25114 DAY OF OCTOBER, 1989 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T, McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad 'Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission .of the City of 'harcho regularly Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution' was duly and ` introduced, passed„ and adopted by the Planning cammi$sion of the ; City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regolar. meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of October, 1989, by the following.vote-to-wit AYES: "COMMISSIONERS., NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT; COMMISSIONERS: � �. RESOLUTT'JN N0. Aft A RESOLUTION OF TNE'PLANNING COMMISSION OF, THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA, RECOMMEND!, DENIAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF DEVELOPMENT ➢ISTRICT '<AMENDMENT 89-04, REQUESTING TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP ,BRIM "OP" (OFFICE/ PROFESSIONAL.) TO "M" (4F3IUM RESIDEN't4rAL,. 8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR 3,556 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT; THE SOUTHEAST' CORNER• OF GRCHIBALO AVENUE'"00 CHURCH STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, -AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-332-2¢ A. Recitals (i) Future Estate, Inc, has filed a^ application for Development District Amendment No. 89-04 as, described in the title of 'this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development District Amendment 3s referred to. as "the application". (ii) On September LT, 1980, and continued to October 11 and October 25, 1989, the Planning Commisslon`of the City of Rancho Cuc monga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and issued Resolution No. recommending to the City°Council that th,, associated General Plan Amendment No. 89-02C be denied. (iii") All ;legal 'prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred, B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifica'[ly finds that all of the facts set forth in Recitals, Part "A" of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. 'Based; upon substantial evidence pr4sented to this Commission during. the _above-referenced public hearing on September 27, ,1989, and continued to October 11 and October 25, 1989, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to;approximately 3.556 `acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located_at the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Church Street and is presently vacant. Said. property is currently designates! as '11011" ('Office/Prafessional); and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is L°designated "' (Low'Residential, 214 dwelling units per acre) and is;developed. . with s.ngle family residences and a church. The property to the west is designated 'VI (Low Residential, 2-4 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with single family residences,, The property to the_east is designated "M" h _ r { PLANNING COMMISSION 'RE'SOLUTIOH NO. ' DDA;89-04 - FUTURE ESTATE, 16C'., - DENIAL a' Oc�oberw 2S, 1989 AWL G � (Medium Residential,, 8-14 dwelling units per .acre) and is developed with residential condominiums.: The property,to the South' is, designated,1411 (Medium,. Residential 8-14 dwelling units' per acre) and is developed with residential' (' apartments and is''partially undeveloped! and a - (c) The ,proposed amendment would ,have a significant impact on Ci�affey Jpint_ Union t1:gh,-Sgi�aol _a'nd Central .School Districts" ability, to provide. adegiiatie-tervic'e to the residents of the 'area, as evidenced by the � fact that an appropriate mitigation agreement has not been reached between the property owner and the Districts. 3, Based upomrthe substantial evidence presentcd;.to this Commission during the above-referenced p6.C` c hearings and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs e y {,. r para ra hs '� �;nd 2.abut/`���nis Commission-1.ereb finds and- concludes, as follows: (a) That the proposed'ame-ndment would"have sign Weant impacts on the School Districts ability to provide'service to the residents of the area. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in 'compliance with the 'Califer6ia Environmental Quality Act of ' 1970, and further, this Commission hereby recommends against the issuance of a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findiings and conclusions set forth in paragraphf;.- y 1, 2,_'3,,and 4 above, thiiC%ommission.hereby resolves t halt<pursiU^t to Sectio, 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Plan Commission of the City-of.Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends denial wahol_, prejydice on the 25th day of Optober, 1980, rof Oevelopment District Amendment 89-04: 5, The Secretary to ,this Commission shall. certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED ANDADOPTED THIS 25TH, DAY OF OCTOBER, 1989. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO 'CUCAMONGA Larry T. McNiel Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary- _ rr{ " ' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. OOA 89-04 —FUTURE ESTATE, INC, - DENIAL October 25, 1949 Page 3' I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Camminsion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was d41y and regularly introduced, passed'L and adopted, by Planning Comission. if the City of-Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of,. the Planning Commisstdn held ` on the 25th day of October, 1989, by the following vote-tp-wit.' AYES- COMMISSIONERS'; NOES: COmmrsSi6ips? ABSENT: COMMISSIONERSt i if i _ A F CITY OF.RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT U DATE: October 25, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner 7 BY: Cindy Norris, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVFRONME, NTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENi" F9-02A < ' w, E.G,; .. UEVVELOF: ENSq request to amend the General Plan Land Use—lta`� frowr CoXltrol to Medium Density Residential (8- 14 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 1.78. acres of land located on the, west side=of Carnelian Avenue; east of the Cucamoilga Creek Flood Control Channel, an&r mouth of I Vivero Street APM: W-022-64. (Continued from October it 11, 1989) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMEWME'T 87-12 - E.G.H. DEVELOPMENT - A _request to amen: ' t.>)p„ Development Districts .Flap from flood Control to Metvjm, Density Residential (8-14 60'1 sig; units per acre) for approximately 1.78 acres of' land located on the west siete :of Carnelian Avenue, east of the`Cucaraanaa'Creek Flood Control Channel, and south of Vivero Street - APN: 207-02244. (Continued from October 11. 1989) RELATED FILE: TENTATIVE TRACT 14263 1. BACKGROUND: The public hearing on these items`-,gas continued from the October llth meeting at the request of the applicant. This request was made to allow the applicant time"to develop potential mitigation agrec;nents with,the impacted school districts. II. DISCUSSION: At the writing of this report no agreements have been forwarded to staff to indicate mitigation of the potential .school impacts although the Contral School District was schedu'iea" to review -a proposed agreement at its Board .meetiag%'of October 18, 1989. Staff wiil inform the Planning Commission of the status of the developer/school' district agreements with an oral report at the public meeting, if agreements with both Central and Chaffey Districts' have been executed, it would then be possible to recommend the issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the i4 project and then consider approval of the land use amendment as 1 requested. ITEMS E l� F h f1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ` RE: GPA 89-02k & ODA 87-12 - E.G.M. OEVEL`. October 25, 1985 Page 2 ISI. RECOMMENDATION: Because of the potential negative imracr to• school services, staff recommends that after the public hearir, the ,• Plagh in.g CpMmission'shoVld,consider the following options: A. If signed school impaction mitigation agreements for both Central and Chaffey; Districts are- presented at the meeting, it would ha approp:iate for the Planning Commission to recommend apprr•val of a Mitgated.Negative' Declaration. It would them be possltle far the Commission to recommend ep,+rova= of 'general: Plan ' Amendment 89-02A and .Developiin't District,:Amendment 87 12. l 8. If signed school impaction mit;igationr agreements for both- Central and Chaffey Districts, ark not presented at the meeting, the Commission should consider the following: , 1 if testimony is given, indicating that procedural delays have resulted in an inability to have, the agreements executed and that there is good, reason; to assume that they wfil be finalized in the near Future, then the Commssioh ma dish to consider continuing the items tis;:ttre nex, ;,seting. 2. If to simony is given which indicates that there are sub5tantial .differnces between' fhe applicant and, school district(s) regarding thi.=provisions of the agreement(s), then the Conxnission may dish to consider denying the app"[ication, without prejudice, based on unmitigatable school service impacts. Respvc idly, sit bmi tted, Ora Bu r City sner ;. . 11 BB•CN;ko Attachments; October 11, 1989 Planning Commission Staff Report GPA 89-02,IA' Resolution of Approval DDt 87-12'Resolution of Approval GPI!89-02A Ret�f6tivn of Denial ODA 81*12 Resolution of Denial --- -,---GITYSOF RANGT"F gA� .A O CUCAMONG t DATE: October 11, I984 TO; Chairman and. Members of the Planning Comui'sion. FROH Brad Bn.l ler,,City Planner BY; Alan War"ren, Associate Planner Cindy, "Norris, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CENTR'k, SCHOOL DISTRICT GEhERATIO4 RATES Since the writing of the GPA 89-044L and 02C reports, ad#itional information rregarding the student generation, rates he's come to ou.r, attention. instead of a generation factor of 7562 (studentslunit)` for, singl-a family development forL the anticipated elemeptary students, a. f lower .4252 figure is used by Central School District as an overall rate for the district.. See. attached. Central School District 'letter-with amended note, dated October 9, 1989 from,Ingrid,Vogel; Therefore, the following number of students is now expected from the two Am SPA developments: Rate Students studen� tlunitri x units generated GPA 898-02 A Chaffey High School .15 32 5 Central Elementary,' .43 ` 32 14 Subtotal 19 GPA 09,-02C Chaffey High School .15., 40 6 Central Elementary .43 = 40 13 Subtotal 21 TOTAL di in addition $9420 and "in 89-02A) whi attached t revised ch ref amended school ienrollmentA percent :age for revised student generation figures. l'a L,-po,,t�sll q ; tea s • �� r .•�Q�m�9gp oo�c*..a�'��G . aZ,� A �� 1 S ;t N'S a Q g '1 ✓^ DXSTRICx WIDE SCHOOL, E. INROLLMEWT FIGURES for: combined Gt-A's '89-02A.fc, C *fEGt yTUDENT$1 � r� Q'JRRENT CAPACZ�� DPP S9- 2 Or DIST'4ICT ENRdLLMENT' PEPMA3dE$T O2C,,.�%L ENROLLMENTS -- --r^ Cer^tra2 4282 25123. 42�^3 14 .3 1? °1 , '• 7 Chaffey 4620 3800 46'2 5 ,O9 6 1 2 1 as generated by the ,anticipaf6d' residential project on -rhe sites of, the GPA's. {' ` `? r Z of current enrollmeit-district "e 3 figures from City Master_ E�vironiaental'` 5ssasment-12988 fO` f � y too i .t bt..ia 1 44 a6De t to a tYlsli7�T qsS;fp®'Chili elvd.3 f imcho Cucamonga, iupd V6get A71A7-��4#9`s,&Us l"*so 0 luiy, 26e L469 Also,?. i PT. I"1%TPwcTto" .tc, ` itsot:cy 3, aat}i°itt ;, psojat:t �rcA.'.ceca ''I pit;Assi-Q,ralma•az,arrhit&4vs 9627 MG-It' Al'i 4ua, 'Sul,ta 220 Ranch* isernonga, CA 01710 Oarsr:^sr. stat�in3tt s'k Z Am, in avaeipt of 7003: .1tay 26th iet:lr, dealing vita"trout p1ganad 1. .. . construa_ten on tre West side oa,CJk;rn rlian 5trelt at the Sntlrllttto:} of taLnvl Pn and Ittv6vor Ya,a atked foe`answort to too gzOit cas. _ k Question F1 Will ..hn Central School gistti`ct,and,tha specific tx4mentary Schcal whfeh serves %W `pr$jRwt bs tarAotmA, 4% tha 4tme this proje" will bed_-cctioled (apprax ma ley ltugst'sc 199012 Response: Valle tist;.A t,,SiOntary School nerves this Ares. Tt is overorowded at the rursent title} Slid, Y*e+ it will bo impacted even, further, at the time the rZoIjlvt to aomplat dd. Quftcticn »i aaasd upon the nplcilio`inIIosmat3u.^. a ,til.i8 eancerniftq this project* vQJ our project have $; gign-tfigant,A094tivs=l,mptot upon the ali;ssriat7 Aeispoaza: Your 'Plana to build 92 3-bedroom. 2�-Oath. homes wilt- havo as sigsiS£iaant;'tslgatias U*A t gpats the d.strict. We wish that we cpuld givo yo4 df,filrint informations but vd tatt't.. :! ; you have any addi;;:iO&I gQQSt;LOAS, let us 14.,40v. sincerely, Er+tilf N. �tfeia � Supeciesteadsnt 10/9�89}[[�� /� qq�(4 sp Generation saetor for Contral '&arionl DI-Otrictiv is Single :Family.,Rona .7562 District Ovorail mvolra .4252 . r f f ILIAttG i :T4toI$f � ttcaror t.it4y AntonQs't.9@6a r., Cebb4 64ksr cti6a 4 A4asa�r Ar+gti Tapioe s_ jFIk�MC r�X�l�t `,f:. `AWW4tM Rfpipb'p F�dR�H Fh t J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REi'ORT 1 " DATE: October 11, 1989 " TO Chairman and Members of the Planning rormttission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Cindy Norris, Associate Planner r SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 80-02A - E.G.M. DEVELOPMENT request to amend the General Flan Land Use Map frorn k god Control :to Mediunj Density"'Residential (8- 14 dwelling dnfts per acre) '.for aprroximately 1.73 acres of land located on the west side of Carnelian Avenue, east of the Cucamonga Creek Flcad Contro - Channet, and south of Vivero Street = AFN. 207-022-64. 4, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 87-12 E.G.M. DEVELOPMENT - A, request to at� a'& the Development Districts Map from Flood Control to' Medium Density Residential (8-14 dwelling .unity per. acre) for approximately 1.78 acres of lCnd located on the West side of Carnelian Avenue, east of the,�,Cucsmonga Creek Flood Cartrol Channels end south of Vivero Street APN_ 207-022-64". RELATED FILE: TENTATIVE TRACT 14263 " I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Re Quested: Approvaf'of a General Plan and Development" District en�(nent to change the ,li-A use designation from Flood Control to Medium Density Residential." B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Existing single family (proposed multi-family, TT L" 14263) and Cucamonga County WeUrDistrict water-" tank: 'Medium Density Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre). South - Vacant with existing drain channel; Flood Control." East - Carnelian Avenue and existing single family,,:t.e',,, Density Residential (2-4 dwelling ,units-per ac-ee). Nest - Cucamonga Creek Flood Control "Channel and existing single family residehees'; Flood Control and Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling uftitc_ per acre) 1 PLANNING'COMMISSION STAFF.,REPORT RE: GPA 59-02A & DDA`97-12 - E.G.M :DEVELOP. October 11; 1989 Page 2 C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Flood Control North - Medium Density Resic'Lntial (8-14 dwelling units per acre) South - Flood..Control East - Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Flood Control and Low Densiiy Aesidential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) D. Site Characteristics: The subject properpv,is vacant with the exception of a landscaped parkway, of .,'alyptus .trees atd shrubs directly adjacent to the existing curb and flood control channel 'along Carnelian Avendc 'The parcel has a varying topography with the majority; of the rSite having,a grade varying from 2 to 5 percent -While the portion located at the southeast cnd has slopes varying From 11 to 20, percent adjacent to the flood control channel. . Directly to the *north are three (3) existing older single family, homes which are to be removed as part,of the proposed development for Tentative Tract 14263. Further north is Win existing water tank and approximately four (4) single family, ®` :homes all which currently front onto Carnelian Avenue '(see r� Exhibit "C"). The land north of these homes has been developed with multi-family units, To the east are enisti'ng single, family homes which rear onto Carnelian Avenue, while to the vast, are existing single family homes separated from the subject property by the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel (approximately !150 to 200 feet wide). iI. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has reviewed the Initial Study, Part I, and the resposes,frcm the school districts and completed nm the .Enviroental Chet,klist,'Part II of the Initial Study, and, except for school inpaction, has found that no other significant adverse environmental impacts will occur as result of the 88 proposed General plash Amendment 89-02A and Development District f! Amendment 87-12, Both the Chaffey High School and Central` School Districts have 33 Indicated that there Will be significant negative impact on. theft t. ability to provide services as a result =of the proposed amendments and planned residential project. TivA potential student generation for each district as a res."It of the proposed amendment will be as :follows; A TF 3 y; PLANNING COK41SSION gTAfii REPORT " �F itE; GPA 89-02A a DDA.87-12 - E.G.M DEVELOP. Ot�tober 11, 1980, y r,' P.dge 3 4y AIM qW f,- rate students studentslunit x units * generated Chaffey High School District .15 j Central School^District 7.5 32 24 L TOTAL 29 *Based on a total of 32,,units as requested in the deveibpment proposal, Tentative Tract 14263. District-wide school- enrollment figures are; attached in Exhibit "I In response to the district's Concerns, staff had requested that the applicanL.work wit, r-the "school district towards, developing , agreements to provide Opropriate mitigation mtasures. As of this date,- the applicant has been able to comp, to an agreement with Vie Chaffey Joint High School District, tout an appre4riate mitigation measure` has..not been reached with Central School District. Staff is currertiy, in contact "with the school district to aid in reaching some form of agreement. Therefore, as adequate mitigation towarnI resolution`--of potential impacts has not bedn reache6 staff it unable to make the determination in favor` of preparation of a Negative, Declaration. III. LAND USA ANALYSIS` A. Back round; On Jurtl--JIS, I584,._ the subject property was declare surplus by the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors, as improvements to the ,Cucardonga Creek Road Control Channe3 Qd keen completed and the, easements were no longer necessary. On March 8, 1989 the Planning Commission reviewed a request from 6uraandy,Cro^k Ltd,, for a proposed ;Development District Amendment from Plood Control to Ndium Density; Residential. ' The Planning Cormnission found that due to the unusual site r configuration and potential traffic" hazards an �arpeliae Avenue, that a determination on land use could not be trade until further information was presented with the ppZicatim including a development p6posai . and traffic analysis. " Additionally, the Planning. Co.mission determ.irted" that a General Plan Amendment would be necessary to charge Lhe land use from Flood Control to Medium Density 'Residential. • :r ff r. r^'4e PLANNING: COM".I55Ioit STAFF REPOR RE: GPA 89-Q2A 4 ODA $7-12 E.'G.M DEVELOP. October II, 1989 Page 4 The Funning Commission also:raised concerns regarding master pianninj of the subject parcel with properties to the north with regard to access-, However, staff has determined that this would not be possible as the property located directly north of proposed. Tentative Tract I4162' continues to be retait,ed by the Cucamonga County Plater District. According to district representatives, the`reseruoir on this site Nnctio_ns as an integral part of their system and- anticipated that it w0l,"bi sliminated. Additionally c a berm is located along the sout4,-end of,the property which functions.'as a levee to protect against,overflows and access would not be possible. B. Traffic Analysis, and Generation Rates: As a resui* of the proposed deveiopiment project, the Engineering Division has, conducted an extensive traffic analysis of the proposed site, and found that the resulting traffic can be appropriately accommodated as"a result of 'future roadway improvements. Carnelian Avenue, which is a designated secondary arterial, is projected to have traffic levels of up to 2$,000 vehtcle�trips per day. As a result, access to Carnelia'a9"is limited and tfie street will be designed with. an ultimate right-of-way .11 of 88 feet, (54 feet of pavement width). Additionally;,. 'to reduce potential hazards to motor vehicles, bicycles, or pedestrians, a right-turn lane will be presided for south hound traffic and the proposed driveway aligned with Vivero Street.. A traffic. analysis, prepared by O Rourke Engineering, indicates that due to existing traffic levels on Carnelian, a Stop light will be necessary at .the Vivero intersection to help reduce speeds and thereby reduce, the,number of accidents between Base Line and Foothill. Additionally, the str,dy concludes that, "this, intersecticn is warranted based,' on existing:conditions. not as a result of the proposed pro4,e%:t.11 A comparative analysis of traffic generation rates as A result of the project for the Low (L), Low Medium (LM) and Medium (M) land use categories Was prepared by staff at shown in Exhibit "4R", 1t was found that the traffic levels would vary, slightly, with the LM designation tending to generate a greater amount of traffic (248 vtpd) than either the L ("IIIO vtpd) or M (195 vtpd) ,categor es. Therefore, although traffic,generatian' rates for different land uses will vary somawhat, the resulting traffic levels still be relatively:Jmir►or in comparison with levels predicted . along Carnelian Avenue as a whore. :The street will be designed to carry the projected wraffic sad at an-. adequate level of service which will. mitigate tfie �proppsed traffic concerns, m PLANNIW COMMIS$10N-STAFF P,£PORT RE: GPA 89-02A & DDA 87-1P E.G.M DEVELOP, October 11, 1989 Pago 5 C. Land Use Analysis: The proposal to designate the subject property as Medium Density Residential rather than Low or Low Medium is consistent`;with the policies cont6ined in the General Plan with regard . to locational and compatibility conside-ations. The General Plan states 'that the Low M and Low Medium (LM). Residentia'': designations are -`intended to encourage lower intensity :,angle 'family housing. The Low 'Medium Density designation'.;is described as one which "encourage(s) greater housing, di4r;sity without dba, ng the single family,character of the surrounding residentiat� character." As a result, this designation'can be useri as a transitional housing type or as a buffer from higher int�ensi.ty uses. In contrast, the` Medium' Density nesidential' designation iS considered a more appropr ,Nte use "adjacent to parks and other open spaces, along transit„ routes and major and secondary thoroughfares, arid,,near activity centers,.such as recreational centers, libraries, shopping`,, centers, and entertainment areas." It can serve as a bu 6,a"--ands better accommodate impacts as a result of traffic and noise. Due to the location of 'the proposed project` adjacent to the flood contn�l channel, with a proposed future regional trail, and Carnelian Avenue, which is a, designated secondary arterial, a higher intensity use is more .appropriate as opposed to one which would encourage 1�a single zfamily character: Additionally, as the project site is sel ,aced from any adjacent residential development by some. form of `edge or barrier, the higher density development,,btill not cause a regative impact on surrounding existing.+vises. IV. DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ANALYSIS: State ;law requires that the Development District, i.e., :Zoning Ordinat(ce, be consistent with the General Plan (Section 65860, Government Code). If findings can he made to warrant 'the General Plan Amendment to Medium Density Residential, then similar finding should also be made regarding the Development District: Amendment change to Medium Density Residential. V. FAGS FOR FINDINGS: In order to approve the,General Plan and- Development D,s Tct Amendments, the Commission. would` have to determine thast the change would promote ;thp land use ,,goals and Policies Of tte,,General Plan and not be mat6dially detrimental to the aajlacent',,.`',properties or cause szgn,F'ficant adverse VAW environmental '3npacts. Following are the findings that are necessary: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT RE: GPA 8942A & DDA 87-12 E.Q.M oEVEGgP. . October 11, 1989 Page 6 r I: The property is scf`Zabie for the use ;ii,Posed, as it has been designated sidrplus by the Flood Control ;District and will be adequately protected" from L flows from the north and east, as determined by the 9ngineering Division, as a result of hydrologic anaiys-,'.sand proposed flood protection measures; and 2. The site is of adequate size and shape to meet all development standard eequirements, .c;%s evidenced by ,+;he; design ,of the relates development proposal, Tentative Tract 14263, and 3. The;sSte will have adequatec access to accommodate the Rropcf;ed use, based on extensive traffic analysis fay the Engi.,w'ering Division a,id proposed future roadway €mpravements;:'and ,; 4. The proposed use is compatible with 0xisting and future land uses in the area, as the proposed: sit#�!Is separated". from any existing residential uses by the;J, Cucamonga Creek Flood ContraT Channel anti Carmeltan 4wnue' to the east and west, and the existing CucamongaOcounty hater Qistrict, reservoir to the north, and ;( S. The proposed amendments are itt conformance with the General plan, as evidenced by "the ability of the Proposed. land use designation to satisfy the stated . andls, objegtiVes# and Policies tontained in the text; 5. The proposed amendments are in confamiA.11ce with the policies and objectives contained within the Development Code, as evidenced by the, ability of the;-proposed site; to meet development standards However, the proposed amendments may result in significant negative impacts .on the ability a9 the Central School Distriot to provide adequate servici az evidenced by tine fact: .that an appropriate mitigafe n ' agreement has not been reached between the propart,, owner and.the D'strisi,:; VII. CORRESPOND idCE: This item has been advertised at a public hearing i�Dail Re art newspaper, the property su lementa arq �{' s p pe y pelted with a pp p o`tif cation si p, ;and notices sent to, all property owners within 100 feet of the project site. f; �� }►r c AP t,r -LANNING COMMISSION -STAFF-REPORT RE: GPA 89-02A & DDA 87-12 - E.G.M DEVELOP. October' 11, 1589 Page 7 Aak VIII. RECOMMENDATION: . As a result of the potential ;neq"ative impact to school .;services, staff recommends that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing and consider all written and oral input in considering the following determinations: A. That the General .Plan and Development District Amendments,be denied, based upon the fact that no definitive mitigation measwre I''s available to resolve the resulting impact on the Central School District. If the -Commission favors this option, staff would recommend, that the denial be "without'-' prejudice" so that the applicant may re-apply at -any time sg a mitigatfon measure or solution f5cfound; or . B. That the General Plan and Development District Amendments.be continued until a- more definitive agreement is- presented, which clarifies the mitigation measures on the school impact issue; or G. That the Planning' Commission deter,�ine that the potential impact as a result of the Gerera1, -Plan and Development District Amendments, of approximatel;y'29 additional students (elementary'and high schooll)i is not sufficient to result in a significant impact on school services. With such a determination, the Planning Commission can recommend a 'Negative Declaration and then consider approving the GPA and ODA applications. Res 11y su d, Brad u le City Pla er il✓� SS:CN:ko Attachments: Exhibit "A" Vicinity Map, Exhibit "8" General Plan Exhibit "C" Location Map Exhibit "D" Traffic Analysis Erhibi`t "E" Proposed Site Plan Exhibit "F" Letters of July 26 and Aug,jst 22, 1989 from Central School District Exhibit."G" - Letter of July 11, 1989 from Chaffey Joint Onicit'Nigh School;. District I Exhibit "N" Letter of September 21, 1989 from I Applicant Exhibit "I"" School Enrollment Figures Y Y yy 1 �I I ti Rasolloo Ave. Proporty Vivere St. L' L' t Foathl"Blvd. vicinity Map,,. CITY OF RAIN640 CUCA:MONGA tTTEM. PLANNING T iISIIt)1�T l i N &xl ISIT; SCAt, : , ••. -°s•e a a°s [•ar[• "}raY • a e s [ ♦ [ [ ► •1.11I • • • • • • e r Y• • a•. •i••.•R•• •e•i• •il.Y•••I•• Ir a {.•'i @ i Fla 17 • • • ! A { • ' �, 4•°•°f°off•' ♦°•°e°s° .. �e�a�• -f�r�. :p'y'^:. s ���ttt e • °fir.°�• 'y'�� • •. • i ..� ry@,,e`�r a {•{e ,: •~e•f • y �: p° r• � 1 [ e�4f \f • i �7 • • •tea• \\\• w • o to ••• :.r�e •r t•••;:• 8 Z. A 'pYR�L �F •a / e•��►L�at4�t • •[••s �. •.• aria••.° ..•:.�p',s °•°een4•�•� ••aa•• s•f +i � M� °i+i•, •;y'aY•• °f4fr,�.. Golf • [ b e [ a a a 0 i [e•' e e • •�• ••�•t s••tuto•a � i•:f i•.:iii•f1•,ii¢Io t71r. '• • 1°•ae�e a •••.•w•e[ aka• ••f••a••►f• ...a•a° °a°.[ ••4 o�•° a.,.•T •�a ^��[+.L L •Yore•• •f�.•Y•••'•Y ^; • z. •• a i 4. : , �.c ••e••tet•••ff• �[. P �•,ef•r•.4e• ,rer • •;►•+•••+•°e° •L• •. r • • • • • a • s, • • n •. • • f f r • • • [ a a e • e s iTQ Aa,J�C e6Ei! r e•'" r�x esaatie[�wemoae�f .. •ea4•d H.H W.ON14e44beaa i•e ew•"e �i � ! 4ea•se �c.o tcaerr •e•a•a • '. ®SJ! • ®• •qA{Q � • 89 •i A s••a e •'f•a e a•.; e•1!'e a•e. •a'4 a'••f•M�4••e t o e • O• � i•i•@ ', q• •!f e � • eAe•s n�s e e o ••e• ••••e..••0 4 p� •err•e•e: ,4 e•er•e a•p•a•e A. t• • { • ;f} . • q O. 1 ts4 0e4a4 •e•a^ef••is•pre' _ Yi ies_. 0 x �.• ®S !e•• O ras•a••. •ef•e••aa•e e••s••• • • �T GC • 6 @ � • f•M•••.O a•ef:••e•w-.4•• �, f'•••i♦f rer ! • . y.T• ® { 6' •s•••ae.,- •pa.Lr s•f esa •r L•L f a 4• B ¢ • i 4.♦•b a• •e f i-4:a a tl-•m R D i •�•i igO q•7• {O•• • e p i s•e u.' s o s...w♦a e•r.4 m s ' •eeea oo oe • • 7 • 00•J O q • • • �+�,,. sm•ca»• •e•or•pa•aee `' ••a L•e•o• { O pi • A • �:' ♦4••rsoeeaem •.o. •••. i•o•e.;• •• . .elf•O O i O O . T,. �•. e•a i.••0.pe ale i • y ••i-rift•..• CITY OF INLAWHO CUCAMONGA rrEM: PLAIiiNING:D�SYOI�, N, TYTLE EXHIBrr. '" SCALE: L 1 \ 1 LJ �.Y. \\\ L s \ \•,.yam 'M' -- !_'1 r-t t r tr Lj f L t S� -'---»-i--. ai L Y L d3 Li { LJ L � LJ Lj LJ w \\ M r� ry CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I1'EM Tj PLANNING gr� r EXHIBk'i: ,cALE. k ' E 71 1 _ EXHIBIT °D' Tr..6 c Ceneration Analysis' Staff has c'nducted a comparative analysis of the traffic generation rates for tht' ,proposed project site based upon possible differing and use categories The generation rates for the Low (L) and Low. Medium (LM) categories were based on average tot size. Additionally, staff assumed p single faraily { (including duplex) type of development 'to^,occor in 1,Ae Low Medium category, rather than a clustered deve'lopmen'C L 18 units x 10.00* w 180 (vtpol LM 24 units x 10.00* = 240 (vtpd) M' 32 knits x 6.,10* = 195 (vtpd) . A r, As can be seen, the Low Medium category would tend.to generate a greater amount of traffic than either the. L or M categories.. It has generally been found that single family type developments t0d to generate higher, rates of traffic due to,,.the larger number of persons per house��Ild. However, traffic is generally more concentrated from 'multi-f lily projects as a result of lima ed access points. Avera9e daily trip geratial obtained from the General Plan Master Environmenta; 'Ai) issment. Flow ' E L 4..rG \ i M .rSn4rtw. 1 •w.n+ +«.x.r.wnr.a x �� "2t?T .. PQC. Lot i+r n.t Mew.' � �-MmU1 ,n• ; 1 N{,ae1tl41t+rY..w ,r,. 131`LW�.14r 4 } dOi iw.xrsa. s.� so �x; Z6x««s�rlM'wR J1 F t} t !4�Jp3� Gn4G►r4+�4+4 41 1} v? rr✓ , w... F} t7 ti w.r.ct«}w.N wHttRFr« 4 �WxQf A }i s�j 16 Alk ` •- �..+ ` { i.n +r.n sera� � f� r�.,7.. L y 1 Aa • � � , S, •Y44i CYN}./Gr�SY�Y�.RIR.IC M4MNK IA-wAIt ftm .�� ar moo., " 14 .:r � yw+4.r44 s 1 +.unw.rr y+� \ � .�4�lY• �'� }itb y' w+ �.n....�� n w r.Y ^MR+.4 � p "� SIA +,r«-" 1! � •: � � 1t era mm CITY OF RANCHO CAMONGA- i'1'M: PLANNING Di' SION i�: ��' •� XI3IP t SCALE. XDM ISTRA7,1oN C n ra� co o l tr c� crone, surcre t n��e e{tt« ', r . i F0o(h'II 81vd.j Rancho Cucamonga;California 91730;(714)989-8541 Ingrid vugsl , '4155T._9UrT nust�vzss. ,1 r� July 26, L989 , �asr.oupr,,iP13TRUGTI ON.^ Mr. Timothy J- Watkins" ' Project Architect: ter. pitassi-17.almau Architects 9622 Haven"Aoenue, uite:q,220 Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91"430 Dear Mr. Watkins: Y I am in receipt of yot July,26th lett'i 3etiling with ,your•planned construction on the,yest stale of;Car#4I;a, Sheet at 'the intersection of Carnelian and vit'."o. You askeei for answers' to two questions, Qusastion #1 will the Cencral,'School,,District:'and the specific tlementary School which sarvi hi"-project be impacted at the',tima this r oject w+'I7 .b g e occupied rapproxitnutely<Auusr 1990)? i.. Response: Value Vista.`Elementary Set IioOti se`Ies this, area* It ovexcrottded at the pz sent- time and, .yes, ie"will be Impacted, 0 evert iurthet at the time the project is completed. question 42' B20,od apon `the specify" information supplied concerninq this project, will our"project,have a significant necq;tl,ve impact' u*pro the district?' Response: Your plans 'to buils? 22 3-br.,droor , 21t—ba_h homes will have a signiFicant negative iSapact'upon the district. -different information, but wc' can't.. We wish that we could give you Tf you stave any additional questions, let us know. sincerely, . -+ �Vain+.N.Join r� Superintendent 7 so' J's II � BARD OF iRGSIk Mentz t.lint hnuld�e 1.RngeN Drldel�ili:rr OtIth a %tu.wa ) 'L An,llew�'f{yL�t IN= qNso �. APIUMISTRATION r hi r 5� � i 5t i t Emin N.-Imes t; suFeR r»ranras>rr 9457 Foothill Bkd,/ Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730,(714)989-85i ' I%rid Vogel ,t Ass'r.sUTT.'OLI 4»rigs v4avon..I..Nagel }9 August 22, 1989 A$3Y.SUPT„INSTRUCT:/ON t Mr. Timothy a. Watkins, Project Architect Pitassi-Dalmau ARchitects r, =.261 Haven Avenue, Su ce 220 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 9 730 i Dear M.. Watkins- _r resprnse to your August 14, 19". letter, I am providing'^you with additional information you requested concerning the impact f your Burgundy _:eek Project upon Central School DistrAct." You asked for answers to six questions: Questi-an 81: What is the current enrollment: and design capacity of the'affected elementary'school,; (Does the design capacity include portable unWtfl?) and the projected enrollment. at the project's completion? Response. The Valle Vista Elementary School is designed for 578 puril-I and presently houses. in exr:ess of 620. In a recent AOL ~' no adequate space to house another portable, thus, we Craw ed pupils to,anosarer school to meet enrollment projections fr: .r 4-)-go. �. Although ,re do hSi%e,pbrtzrbies on the grounds it is the, elementary school operating without a library and a computer center due to the l.acl: of space. Question 02: What is the Student g-ineraticit factor, used by the district: to determine the number of students -expected from your project?' Isf Response: The student generations f actor uSad by tie district is;: 7562 per-unit. . Ques''on 01; Will your project impaot the dis-i�nictrs Ability .to provide adequate, _ service to residents? `tl so, under that ct,iitions.can the:district t provide ade,juate sen_'66 : Response Yes: -- your project will fur4har ovrarcr6wd an already overcrowded E school. We can pNivide ddegsate:serv,:ce if i:-e had additional class- room space.: 'r C Question a4: Does the, strict i,se, or, h&vz plans to use, portabls ti ssrooms to handle the 9tucent em:ollmen4s? Rcspon We have porta6l,;.,r._ �rery site in the school 3istrzet .a , 'c handle the raver inc N asnrol. ent, BOARD OI trs.-!UfS tlenr�l fr Cnlanls 1,'Rufets 04brr NkT, Xxih a.M,rs.rr Andrew{Ti(qr = ri �w V Mr. Timothy J. Watkins i`'' Page Two 8/22/89 Question .. Dpes the''distX Ct have;pl,." to'constrt;ct additigr,. school . V .4cji1ties, And if so, what is the oro�ected l%me,Era�js 'a.^.d".fu soorr ' ' \,y `Response; 'we are present-,,��arimpletxnO the i'ard and final phase of sear Gulch i 6c'gal. We..ara,rurrenrl workin on Statz.a lications rot three. Y. 8 PP acldstional schools'-�- Ter a Vied 11 for 1991� 'RUt}i MuSser M"ddie School for 1492, and the C-v>y,te Canyon Elementary rahool foe 159_ to rsplace t�i temp rar r Chao`�bni;t by Lewis_HamE,>: the £uhE tng 111 souse 1,5 the State of eai for�i�`a aitd at present,not funds ara f ablz kgweveti vte`.hope° to be di�lded`i£ the vote" approve a`school buildin4w'bwsd xssLe at the r } electioh✓ i . Question a6: noes th,' district haVe;a�co mprehensiVe master plan'ar'S-year' action pla,17 .Zf so, what%y s they entail? '' Response: Pest we o 5ave.,a compreixensi 4R,-faster pl1n'an4 our 5-•ear action pl:dn is descrtbecq :.n.Response �5 abase. I trust this is an 4jequate response td you concerns. Adak Sincerely C ✓ �s Xngr.cd Vo,tel - Assistant 3uperinterAi t - y JJ r , e1. c pg c �. ( L 4 # > c r Chaff ley apir t, �UnioP i h SChbc5i District , 11 211 WEST FIFTH!'TREJ8T,O,JTARIO.CALIFUINIA 91762 1698 • (714)980.851 _ SUPERINTENDENT GP SCHOOLS ASSOCIATE SUPERINTENDENT'- ' r` BOARD MHMBERS Dean E.Smoth,=s =INSYRUCTION Kathleen E.>Kink/. ~ ,. r 'Bene B Ronson BinC.Macon' VO , ASStD ANT SUPERINTENDENT F1aharws J Jhalh PER;iONNEL Chanas,J.�}hiW0 Donald-E-Culp Gyriia Y1 Aiott Js`ly Li, '19E' Pitassi-D�!Mau, Architects 3267 Haven A-'e. Ste. 220 Rancho CucamotgA, CA 91730` ATTN: Timothy Watkins ` ^, r TM Burgundy C.reek, Tentative Tract, ,4263 The ahove..referenced project, consisting of 12 tuwnhomes, is situated in the Alta Loma:High School att-ndance area. The current combined" capacities of~Alta' Loma" art Etiwanda Hlith .Schools is 3800, Their combined enrollment is 4620.s The overag;! is housed in trailer classrooms; hoOever, the service facilities (cafeteria, gym. gu-adance and administrative offices, parking, access, library ,etc. ) areV,gfulli inadccjua,'e. for that number of `students. By September. . 1a90,_, We will r have 'completed. certain construction f projects at i;a1.h schools., increap4i� g T air combined capacity to 4950. However, our proj4iotions irdicate.'that by September, 1990, i the combined enrollments of lt➢rl .two s:-7hoals will be 5550. We still will have to use trailer c13)Isrooms, and the campuses still will be seriously q, er`crowded, The Chalfey. District ha. zool (Rancho- Guca,riorrg 8i it Sc'rool) for that area on the drawing boards,- .We have applies` for ;;tale f=undind, but the State nas ;nip money for the pr=aject. A �. State bond issue is' proposed for the Junr,, 1990 ballot. If it gets on the ballot and if the itdu2 is approved and if the Chat . r.' fey District receives- soave of, ,that money, perhaps We could open" Rancho Cucamonza High Schotk; `in 19d2. Given ther uncertainty of State fundirog for Rancho Cuc,.murrga High B/:hool, the Chaffey District� i3 compelled to i lfdxm you that your project will have a sigrif i,:ant negative impact uptrzi the District and that thy: Chaffey D1ztrict 'Seca$ no certain re_lwz �-f that impaction coming :&r..m thti :rats. SCNQ9L4: AtjatOM1•t:(I,urLY 0011}(Int, tauc..ytaz,x.,®tANtIA wankel to,. q,tAtra.:. L, Lc a if _ ) �5 ursuarit to District does levy ucvelo erthoSa fees fall far �dhile the ChafeY 53080 and '85335' school facilities Government Code Section to build thetherefore, wi11•' and roducing enouB� ;mOn"y Ttrict, short of P on a. The Dim r needed. in Rancho Cucaio yther does re' that the- by here or Deny approval o� Te�tative.Tract 14i63, (1) _ 711 63 the approval of Tentative Tracg pe 'Mitted to (Z) Condition, ,. anY a=sidneews not after G.M. B1'Ivalopment a_ t txaet c to and a upon E• and start construc.' on in that pu11 permits _ P,,ancho Cucamonga *didh School. is scho ed. funding �Or that high saha�,l, States 19�63 upon contract awaxd�+d f9r the of Tract Condition the aPProva<1 ty .o3 Tentative ( ) artier Pat ion in a Mal 116, Roos �Cotili ie }; DeWel=opMont's P roPx£atotL school� f��ciliti,ea E.G.M. some c�ther,aEP Facilit%"�s District err 3undind Program .;beyond the currr�n developer fees leYiJd by t l � district. 1 'ncerely . STEPBEM L• BUTTERS Director Business',er.yices l SLB/sb Brad: Buller r r , l� - p_ 4. 11 11 v ti _�.�: A .b• i ,e.� ,r.: :, i. r.�7E2 " " '•i e. tli� 11I31 SEP 21 'Eff 1S•3�=h.,_ fE�Lr:F�iEi1T CA� Itlr P.Z�� September 21, 19&9 Mr. Brad, Buller City of Rancho Cucamonva; Pl"ning Department r P. d. .Box' 807. Rancho CuCetmongar California 1736-UEtOi 'RE., 'cr@ct no, 14263 Dear 19r. ''Buller: This To`rzr is inteAded 'tee voice our concern over the ,,,policies r that Ears being dovelspeo, with regard to the obtaining rof Will, Serve, letters om thy. Chats; and Central school districts, i T would like to state..that we,2iave.,tried to adhere toe every request the city :has nade of ua. WO have striven 'to. make our: plso ect a&i high in quality and its s��bmittsl patck 'as complete i as possible. our goy ',is very kit;ilar ta,tshe city'.as with sagard, `..�. to aestrie, ics and o;ver?(i public aca_eptahce any: -:appeaasenoo pt Crowding of the scho�la:han eevident2, lend to the need oi'' a` stringent 'policy on, WiiJ.-a&rve letters. At the reciuest of, your staff we contacted t:c in order to obtain , in10o;-ration, about our pro "71'44, at feat` on the schools. Through:, our "1, communication - th the districts we have learned of a _pending; Mello-Roos which . ,i�s. �n process to develop ano_l%or school. Chaffey has an agrea:mane which states your, either pay a►� 1, 7 increased fee or--4,►ter into the assessment district , Wa have agrees! to have our apprava� condatz +co. meal;, tk�a� .xiremeikt..; 1�_ J ` 1, would hope the city axted cou—Id worle a sAnailar azrang�msn�c� with ;'`, central school district, tj A project such as ours can .nat pay,thi school fees until we record 8 construct=on, LO&n :banks Wall not ,record construction loans without approvals. Thus gyre,get caught in tha' middle it they must bs paid in advance of tpproval�s, Out projact will, incur at least $B6,Qt)0.e 4 in school fees Ii1uu whatever incroaaa the districts decide on. A'project of our size normally o►yl requires $240,000.0o in capital so you can see the tramohdoue impact which would occur. if the fees needed t.o :be paid bef' we could obtain financing, 44, SEr��cit d� Sb•�t4;i 'OVA-t.=.f-Z 4T 6r Ct+L.iris I LrAplark tho city on,our behalf, As well to VOry ;notch to cgnditioning approvals �S-Ased of tho d6voJ opor onteting-'into an agreeinent Witt the district 1a01`oYa hid' map can I'eoord. the alternative .ot , 40*11019d ,p4symont .w,,- P-d finflliciolly ruin'small`builders, Sincerely, Jeffrey ;S'., Burum Viso Pimsident�` JSB,/pci f 11 ._ 4 f : 1, F2 r {i Ask DISTRICT WIDE SCHOOL ENROLLMENT FIGURES fr combined GPA's 89-02A & A r NEW,STUDENTS! C`.(iRRENT' CAPACITY GPAI" 89- OF. TOTAL DISTRICT .NNOOLLMENT PERMANENT TEMP . 02A (`k) 02C �_ ENROLLMENTS Central'' 4281 25123 42633 24 .5 30 .7 1,3 Chaffey 4620 3800 4620+ 5 Q9 & .1 .2 l as ,generated by the anticipated resdentizl project on the sites of the GPA's 2 .Y of current enrollment-district wide 3 figures from City Master Environmental Assessment-1988 1 9 a 'CIiY OF RANCHO.CUCAMONGA Y'i'ETvi:y PLANNING DrVISIQN ' EXIITT: SI : rh RESOLUTION NO,. \ "�} ,s A RESOLUTION -OF THE PLANNING COMKISSIQk OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL'"PLAN AMENDMENT 89-02A;" REQUESTING TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAY` FROM FLOOD CONTROL TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DtELLING'UNITS 'PER ACRE) 'FOR I.V+ACRES OF LAND LO11 CATED WUT O.F.CARNELIAN, EAST OF THEGUCRMONGA 'CREEK FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL, AND SOUTH OF VIVER0 STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALTMNIA, AND MAKING' FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 20?r422-64. ', A. Recitals, (i).: Q.G.M. Development-has file' an applicatior, for General Plan Amendment No. 2942A as,, described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in i<hiS)Resolution,,the.suhject GenerQIJlam•Amendment is referred to as "the application"'. (ii) On October 11, 1989, .the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga condur0ed a duly noticed public hearing, on the .application. On this date, it was, 'requested that the item be continued to the next regilarly scheduled meeting ion October` 25, 1989, Ali legal preregOisites to the adoption of this Resolution. have occurred. u, 8. Resol-ution. ' NOW, THEREFORE,,, Ti is hereby found, determined a.nd resolved by the Planning Commisyian of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follo,1s: ? This Commission hereby specifically fiends thai all o,f the facts set forth in Recitals, Pant' "A" of this Resolution are true and correct. 2 Based upon substantial 'evidence presented` to this Commission during the above-reference+--public hearings' on October Si any Octob� 1989, inclu(",'ig writte ! and oral staff reports,, `together with public, testimony* this."Commission hereby specifically finds, as follows: Y. (a) The{a ppl i cat i on aprlies to approximately,1,78 acres of lane, in hasically a •l,^iangular configuration, located west of;,Carnelian ' east of the, Cucamonga Creik> Flood :Co� Ch troi: annel;,, and south of °VfVero and is presently vacant._ Said property is currently,designated- as -Mood Controls and l _6 PLANNING COMMISS?ON RESOLUTION NO. RE: ''GPA 89-OZA - E G.M. DEVELOP.' October, 25, 1989 Page (b} The property to the north of the subject site is designated Medi.,,m Density Residential (8-14 dwelling units, per arse) and has 3 existing single family homes, The property,to the west is designated mood Control and Loft Density Residential (2.4 dwelling units per acre`) arid' is developed with the Cucamonga CreC.:: Flood Control Channel and single family homes. The property to the east. is designated Low Densi,ty'Residential (2-4 dwelling. units,p r acre) and is�d,eveloped with,existing single family.homes. The property to the south is designated Flood Control and has an';existing channel drains and (c) The property ,is suitable for the use proposed, as s°E has ru_:, designated surplus by the Flood. Control District and,-,'Will be adequately protected from flows from the north and east, as determit4ld by the Enjineering Division as a result oA hydrologic analysis and proposed flood protection measures;, and (d) The sites is of adequate size and shape,,Ito meet all development standard requiremen-cs, as evidenced` by the design of the related development proposal;, Tentative Tract 14263; and (e) The- site will have adequate access to accommodat`,,the proposed use, based on extensive traffic'analysis by the Engineering Di+r �sion and proposed future roadway improvements; and (f) The proposed tt,e is compatible with existing and future land uses in the area, as the proposed site is separated from any existing resideatial -uses by the Cucamonga Creek Flood Controll Channel and Carnelian Avenue to the east and 9rest, and ;the existing Cucamonga County Water District reservoir to,the north; and (g) The proposea amendment will not have sigf,oificant impacts on the environment, public services, nor the surrounding-properties, as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Initial Stud,5,,,.Part II, and the. implementation 4f a mitigation agreement between the property owner,and Chafey Joint Union 'High School District and the Central Schooa District; and (h) The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan, ,as evidenced by the ability of the proposed 'land use des?gnation to satisfy the stated goats, objectives. and policies contained in the'textl and The proposed amendment is in conformance with the policies E and objectives contained Within the Development Code, as evidenced by the i} ability of the proposed site to meet development standards. 3. eased upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearings and upon the specific findings ;of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission'hpreby finds and concludes as -follows-. . _ mk J.a �j.,. � PLANNING cftlssio ,;66 ItTION`fNf1 RE: "GPA 8942A r--E.G.M. BVIELOP. October 25, 1986-` r. Page 3 F1 i (a) That 00 suk-jest penperty is auftabie 'for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access,. s ze, and compatibility wW existing land use in the surrounding area;. and (b) That' the proposed ame,idrrent 'jouldl'not have significant impacts on the environment,nor the surround1ng,:9ropert-,ls; and yC) That tha proposed ameodroott is in conformance, with the General Plan. ., I (, 4. '- This Commission hrELvJnds thaw the project has been reviewed and considered ,n complianc8 with tii Cdlfornia Environmental,Quality Act of 1970 ano, furt„�r, this. Commission hereby recommend!; issuance of a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to section 55850. and 65855 of the, Califgrnia Govi,rnment .Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho%Cucamonga hereby��*ecammends apprcwal on the 25th day of October, 1989, of eenerul Plan Amendment's 5 02A. << 5, The Secretary to this f iwnissi;;. shall" cc�tify to the as.optio? of this Resolution.. J=� APPROVO AND ADOPTED, THIS 25TH DAY'OF OCTOBER, 1989. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY ('.F RANCHO CUCAMONGA 3" BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretor?;r; of the._Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby �^:Vlfy thif the i'foregoing Resol;tti in was dgly and regularly introduced, passed, s:i.adopted by.the planning k'�mtiiS,son"'of the, City of Ranches Cucamonga, at v rogillar-,;eating of the plarirr?aig Commission held on the 25th day of October, 1AS. by the following vote-tto.w3`ts AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: -a 71, - F= RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PIVNVING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA, kCO,MMENDING APPROVAL •OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRI'CT:AMENDMENT 87-I8, REQUESTING TO AMeND THE;, DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAP, FROM FLOOD CONTRf��f TO MEDIUM�DENSITY RFSIDENTI L �8- 4iItIELL1NG Ut2T PEi ACRE) f FOR 1.78 :ACRES ,OF 'LAND LOCATED ON THE k9T SIDE 0° CARNELIAN AVENUE, EAST OF THE CUCAMONGA 'CREEK FLOOD CONTROL .CHANNEL,:- AND SOUTH :OF VIVERO STREET, RANCHO CUCANONGA, CAL!kRNIA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 41207-022-64 " A. Recitals. a (i) E.G;fM. 'Development has filed an- application for Development, - District Amendment No. 87-12 as _described in the title of this. Resolution.�; Hereinafter :in this Resolution, the subject Development Di-stricti,Amendment is referred to as "the application (ii) On 'October 11, 1989,'the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.. On this date, it was requested that t"e item be continued ,to thq', next regularly scheduled meeting of_October 25,'1989.: (i i) Al legal prerequisites to the adoption of: th"t Resolution have occurred.. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREARE, it ,is hereby found, determined and resolved b the Planning Commission' a;fi Zhe Clay of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: y i. This Comma„sion hereby spi ifically finds that all of the facts set forth in Recitals,: Part "A", of this Resolution are true,and correct, t 2. ,Based ,upon substantial evlidence^ presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public herrings .on October. 11 and October 25, 198S,, including written and oral itaff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies .to approximately 1.78 acres of,: land, in basically a. triangular configuration, located;west of Carnelian, east, of the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel, and south of Viverp and i$ ` presently vacant.- Said property.is currently designated as Flood, Control; and PLANNING COMMISS',ION' RESOLUTION NO. RE, DDA 87-12 E,GA MELOP, October '25, 1939 e Page 2 (t.) The property to.the north cf the subject site is designated Medium Density Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and has 3 existing - single family homes. The property to the West is designated Flood Control and Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and is developed faith the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel and single family homes. The property to the east is designated.Low Density Residential' (2 ¢ dwelling"anus per acre) and is developed with e$_?sting single family homes. The~property to the south is designated.Flood Control and has an existing channel drain; arid, (c) Th t por y posed, pis it has been designated 'surplus by 'the Flood Control District and will be adequately protected from flows from the north and •east, as determined by the Engineering Division as a result of hydrolcgictianalysis and ;proposed flood protection measures; and ,. (c] The site is of- adequate size and shape to meet xi17 development standard requirements, as, evidenced by the design of the relates development prt�posal, Tentative Tract"14263, and fe), The site will have adequate access to accommodate the proposed. use, based .on extensiv(t traffic analysis by the,Engineering Division and proposed future roadway imprxrvements; :and (f) The proposed use it comuatibl`e= n' th existing and future land uses in the a lea, the. proposed site is separated from any existing residential uses by the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Ghannel and Carnelian n.s ;nue to the east and west,; and the existing Cucamonga Count-,I'jWater Distr°ict reservoir to.the north; and,'% (g) The proposed amendment will not have significant impacts on the environment, public services, npr-the surrounding properties, as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of Vie Initial, Study, Part II, abd the, implementation of a mitigation" a3reement between the prop*-rty owOr and Chaffey Joint Union High Schov Dis€:rict and the Central school Qistricj,' i"and (h) The proposer amendment is in co tformane,-"xiith`, ,e,"Genek,al Plan, as evidenced by the ability of then proposed land use desisrtation to ?. Y g r' jectives,''rnd policies contained in �the�";fiext and satisfy the stated gals:.-• objectives, M The proposed' amendment:. is in confo;manre With!3:,'se policies 7 ' and objectives contain(-d Wtiln "the Development Code, as evidenced by the ability of the proposed site to meet develorr4, t standards. 3. Based q,on the substapti{11 a-a d'ence presented this'Commission � dt:-ing the above-refirenced public"hearin'', and upon tine specific findings: of facts set forth in paragraphs I and14 above,;this Commission hereby.finds and concludes as":allows: k ]r t C �r PLANNING COMMISyION'RESOLIITION NO: RE: DDA 87-12 - E.G.M. DEVELOP. October 25, 1989 page 3 r (a) That th subject pr�pti rtv Is suitable ,.for the uses permitted is the proposed district in terms o, access, size, .nd compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area;; and (b) That the proposed amendment mould not have significant impacts on the 'environmentnor'the- surrounding properties;znd- (c) That the proposed amendment is in conformance withthe General Plan: 4. This Commission `hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance With the Ca,ifornia Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this ,Commission hereb;� recomm6ds issuance of a Negative Declaration: 5. Based upon the findings and' conclusions set fortkv .n paragraphs 1, 2, 1, and 4 above, this'ftmmiasion hereby resolves that pursuant to Section 65850` and f5855 of the California Government Code, that' the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho.Cucamonga hereby, recommends approval on the 25th day of October, 1989, of Development District: Amendment 87-12. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall cert7!! to the adoption of this Resolution. r, t APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 251711 DAY OF OCTOBER, 19,89.` PLANNING COMMISS40m OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY I La.^ry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST. Brad 5-5-TI e-e Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho CucaMonca, do herEny cortify that the foregoing Rpsolufiicn was duly and regularly introeuc,',, assed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho C"=aZ ga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of Qctebee, 1989, by the ol?ow ng vote-to-wit: DYES: COMW IONERS NOES: COOMI5'JIONERS ABSEMT: COMMISSIONERS: 1 z4 u II " t z, RESOLUTKG' A nESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. OF THE CITY .OF: RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. RECQMMENDING DENIAL WITHOUT PROUDME OF GENERAL PLAN AMEN'�iENT`89�-02A, REQUESTING TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN. LAND;USE MAR:FROM.FLOOD CONTROL To MEDIUM DENSITY*SIDENTIAL (8:-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE); FOR 1,7$ J1C -IF LAN1 LICATED WEST-:Of�•CARNEt IAN,nEAST-CF THE CUCAMONGA. CREEK FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL,, AND. SOUTH Of VIVERO STREET,: RANCHO'CUCAMONGA, 'CALIFORNFA,, AND';MAKING' FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN: :201-022-64 A. Recitals. (i) E..G"K. Development has filed an .app'lidation for Genei^al� Plan Amendment- No. 89-02A as, described in. the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,.the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application". 00 On. October 11,`1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Ra)icho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the appl,ication.,, On this`.date, it was. requested that the item, be.. continued, to the next regularly scheduled meeting of'October 25, 1989, 1„ (iii) All legal prerequisites to the i Option of this Resolution have occurred, B. Resolution, NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found„ du44rm 4ed..and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamong�;as fQ10i s; 1, , . This, Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth' in 'Recitals, Part "A", of this Resolution':are true and correct. 2. Based., upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearings on October 11,(and`October 25, 1989, in4luding written and oral staff reports,,, togei-wer with. public ' testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds'as follows: l . (al. The 'application,--applies to approximately 1,78 acres of,: land, in basically a triangular configuration, located west of Carnelian, east of the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control, Channel, and south` of Vivero and A s ' presently vacant. Said property It currantly designated,,as Flood Control!; and 0 PLANNING CG�MISSION, `OLUTION NO;. ""RE: ,GPA 89-02A E. N. DFVELOp. October 25, 1989. Page 2 - „\ Ask (b)' The rooertyjlto the north of the subject site is designated Medium Denssty;Resident_al (8-14 dwellingunits per acre) and has 3 existing singla family Domes. ''The property, to the west_xs d?sigjated Flood Control and Lowg Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units pE��;acite)I and ,is develciped.with the Cucamonga -Creek Flood Control Channel and; sti `c3.e itamily -.. . homes.. The. -prooerty�ta the east.is des-igna-ted Law Density R 5,44-";teal,-{2-r dwelling units i per•acre); �:nd 'is developed with existing single family homes. ihe, property to the sou h i.s,. deIignated Flood Control and has an existing channel drain, and (c) The proposed amendment would have a significant impact on the Chaffey Joint Union High School and 'Cer�tral Schoial Districts' ability to provide adequate service to residentsi of the area ;; s vviden.r3,by the fact that an appropriate, mitigation agreemehl,• has not .'been;reached`between the property ormer and the`'Ostricts. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented-to this Commission during the above-referenred,.publ,ic hearing any upon the specifi,p findings of faet5 set forth in ara ra hs .?snd 2.above,'tf�is Commission,.e p g p reby, finds and concludgs<as follows:, (a) That the proposed amendment would%jiave significant impacts on the School Districts.` ability to,provide_service �g the residents of the area. 4 'his Commission' hereby finds that the, projeGt.has been reviewed and considered in complia�jce with'''the"California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that.pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Gorprnment Code,'.�hat the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereoy recommends denial without 'prejudice on the 25th day of October, 1989, of General Plan. Amendment No', 8942A. 6. The, Secretary to this Commission shall cerl:ify to the adoption ' of th ft Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1989. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST. S.. Brad Buller, 5ecretia PLANNING COMISSIO RESOLUTION NO. RE: GPA 89;02A - B.GJL DEVELOP. October 25,`1989 Page .3 ;y l I, Brad Buller, Secretary,oF ,the Planning CammISsion.of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby ;certify; ,,, the foregoing Resolution was 'duly and regularly inteoduced,' passed,,, aria adopted by the'.Planning 'Commission of the City of Rancho. Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission h4'fd on the 25th day of October ..I989, by the-fq lowing voxG-toParit ., AYES, COMMISSIONERS.: NOES. COMMISSIONERS: - ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: AM a `n y �} .. �`k RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION�� Tk PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY-OF RANCHO CUCAMD' A; 'C"ALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING DENIAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE . O,lf DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT $7,12, REQUESTING TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS MAp F"OM FLOOD CONTROL TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS 'PER "ACRE) FOR 1s78 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE WEST` SIDE i3OF CARNELIAN AVENUE; EAST "OF THE CUCAMONGA CREEK FLOOD +:.OP4TROL tHANNEL,.,AND SOUTH OF - VIVERO STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA:-ANO ,MAKING `. FINDINGS IN SUPMRT THEREOF,; APN; 207-022-4% A. Recitals. :4 L' (1)_� E.G.M4 Development has filed an application fvr`,beyelapment District Amendment No. 87-12' as described in the title of, this.,Resolution. Vereinaf`R in this Resolution,, the s-vbject Development District Amendment "s referred to as "the`applidation"' 4 00 On October 11, 1989, the Planning Commissior- :of the`City of Rancho Cucamonga cony acted a du;y noticed public heaiiing, on thc.apptication. On this date, it was requested that the item be1jco-ntinued to ;the,. next regularly scheduled;r�eetin .of October 25, 1989. �l (Iii) Al!- cgal prerequisites to the adopl, en, of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby, found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as;follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically, finds that all of the facts set forth in Recitals, Part AP, of thia-°esglution are true and correct'. 2, eased upon l.aubstantiai -evidence to this Commission during the above-referen„ed public hearings _on October, 11 and, October 25, 1989, including written 'and oral staff reports, together 'tai'eh public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as folIowsc" j (a) She application applies to approximately 1.78. acres of land, in basically'a triangular configuration; located an the waist side,of I' Carnelian Avenue, east of the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel and south of Viver�l Street and, is, presently vacant. _ Said property is currently designated as Flood Canict; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, iE: ODA 87=12 - E.0 $, DEVELOP,. October 25,:1989 Page 2 (b) The arop,rty to the north of the subject site is designated Medium Delssity Residential (0-14 dwelling units per acre); and has three existing single family,homes. The property,to the West is .designated Flood CortroT and Low Density Residential . (+1-4 .dwelling units per acre) and is developed with the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control. Channel and single family homes. The :property to the east is designated Low,Density. Residential (2-4 dwelling units. per acre) and is developed ;With existing single family homes. _n �,. property: to the sa�th �s designated Flood Control and ...has .an; exi�tit�g'" channel drain; and r (ci the proposed amendment may result -,�� s�grtificant�negative impacts on the„,,aaffey, da_irtt Union High School and ,Central.School Districts` ability to provide adequate service to the residents of the areai:,..as evidenced by the fact, that en appropriate mitigation z�reemen has. not been reached between the property owner and the. Districts. 3. 3ased upon the substantial .evidenre presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearings and.rupon .the specific findings,of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 ab^±ve, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: • (a) That they proposed amendment would heve,,sigoificant impacts �. } on the School Districts' ability to provide adequate sere-ice to the residents of the area. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the 'project has been reviewed, and considered in compliance with the California Environmental'Quality 'Act of 1970. 5. Based upon the findings and conciusions' set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission Hereby, resolves that pursuant. to Section 6%50.to 65865 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commissfon of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends denial without prejudice on the 25th day of October, 1, 9 ' Y c_t r, 98 , of'Development D3stri,ct Amendment 87- 2. 6. The Secretary,to this Commission shall certi#y to the, adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED.THIS'25TH DAY OF OCTOBER,, 1989. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCN0 CUCAMONGA 8Y: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST;. Bra,_' buller, Secretary, PLANNING COMMI$ ION RESOLUTION tiO. - 3;. ' � RE: DDA 87-191- EhG.M. DEVELOP, October 25, 1989',' Page 3 ti I Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify.'that the foregoing Resotutiot) Was duly and regularly_introduced, ,passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the r City of Rancho Cucamong , at a regular meeting of the planning Commission held on the 25th day of October 19$9, by the fa;lowing vqt? -to-wit: AYES: COMM,IStIONERS: NOES: COMMONERS: MONERS: ABSENT; COMMI55IONRS41 i� 1 i I rr F E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE Oct6uer 25, 1989 TO: Chairman and:Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad BuIler,''City Planner BY: Tom Grahn, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRWENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE .TRACT 14263 - E. .M. DEVELOPM NT -.A residential subdivision and design review of con ominium units on 3.35 acres of.land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and the Flood Control District (a ptoposed Medium Residential District), located on the 4st . side of Carnelian, at Vivero Street - APN: 207-022r54 and 64. Associated with this project is General Plan, Amendment 89-02A,- Development District Amendment 87-12, and Tree Removal Permit 89.58, t, This item was continued from the Octo'oer 11, 1989 7anning Commission meeting due concern over school impactions identifies in the associated General Plan Amendment.. Recommended changes to the Resolution have been included in the attached Resolutions of Approval. However, if the Planning ICommission is unable to take affirmative action on General Plan Amendment 89-02A and Development District Amendment 87-12, staff would recommend that the,`Comni"ssion consider an additional continuance or direct staff to prepare, a Resolution of Denial. Res ly su d, it i Bra l City Pi ner BB:TG:mlg Attachments: Staff Report From October 11,-1989 Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract 14263 Resolution of Approval for Design Review of Tentative Tract 14263 IM G c, u CITY 3(j`�O leZA{\"NCHO CUCAMONGA k $R+AL F REPORT 1 Jl L I DATE: October 11, .198$ TO. Chairman awed Members of the Planning Commission FROM; Brad Bailer, City Planner BY: Tam Grahn, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL' ASSESSMENT ANO, TENTATIVE. TRACTF 142C3 MA DEV N - gyres ent a su v s.on an es,ig�r review 57 ,,.T con ominium units on 3.35 acres of-14nd ie' the Medium Residential District (8-14 dw4lling gnits per" acre) and,the, flood Control District (a proposed Medfu Residential District), located 'on the west side of Carnelian at Vivero Street ' APN*.' 207-022-54 and 64. Associated with this project is 'General Play Amendment 89-02A; Development District ,Lnendment 87`-42, and 'free Removal Permit 8,9,,Ja. Y I. PROJECT AND SITE.DESCRIPTION, A. >Action Re4u�uc__sted. A?oproval of the detailed site plan, grading plan, an-dscape plan, buildjng elevations and the issuance of a Negative Declaration. 8. Project Density 9..55 dweil'ing units per acre. C. Surrou6dinct Land Use and 2znin NortVacant, S ng a am y residential; Medium Resident,W District (4.8 dwelling,units per acre) ' South - , vacant; Flood Control District 'East Single family residential; Lawn Residential District (2-4 d%,elling units per acre!, West Vacant, Cucamonga Creek Chanrivi,=-Flood'Control District 0. General plan Oesi nations Project e medium Residential and flood Control (Medium Residential designation proposed) North $gdium Residential South - F,�aod Control East - LoW `Residential West flood Control t, PLANNING4 COMMI$S1C surr REPORT Tr 14263 - E.G.M. -_VELOPMENT October 11, 19$9 Paye 2 ,.F E. Site' Characteristics* The northern half of the project site contains ree 3 ingle family, residences and one (1) detached garage. s All.four (4) structures will be demolished. The south„zrn a& f of t64 site is vacant. There are a, *umber of mature trees On-site which required`the,preparation of An arborfst report. The project site is relatively flat,, sloping appraximatZtj+ six (6) percent from north to south. II, PXALYSISs A, Pack round: r�Associated with this project is General Plan Arne ment 89-02A and Cevelopmeat Oistrict Amendment 87-12, both applications were required-as the southern half of the project site is currently designated Flood Control. The General Plan Amendment proposes to change :the Flood` Contrai land use designatiah to Medium Residential. The Development District Amend ment>proposes to change the Flood Control land use district to MediGm Residel." al, K General: The applicant. is proposing sixtee;; (161 two-stry y dup"�e "units~with 'two (2) elevations, totaling 3,{135 sq4 '.ee?t Unit A totals 1,420 square feet and Unit' D totals 1 u, sq!iare feet, C. Design Review Committee. On September 7, In6l, the Committee 8.akes eye,MCNIe1,__ rqutil) reviewed;'-- the,_ project acid recommended Approval with the following conditions: 1. Remove the glass block element and replace with standard windows z. Fxtend the pot shelf element at; the right.and left side elevations of Building ype 1. 3. A textdtrized.paying treatment or concrete band should be provided .idea the front of al.l garagps to crpate :a pedestrian: path leading tq the rec titian area:' D. Tree Removal Permit 89-58: The applicant has submitted :a rear es or t e remova o Wenty-five (25) trees, out of a total of forty-three (43) trees, in conjunction with the development of this tract. The majority ofc,he trees proposed for removal are Eucal tus sidernxl n'rosea (Red Irorrbark), kz which were planted: as par of the arse an beautification project, rand are in conflict: with street righit-of-wayy improvements along Carnelian. their removal is necessary, to obtain a deceleration lane leading to the. projectL entrance'. Extensive arborfst studies were performed to determine the health and condition of the existing trees, and their suitability for pressryation in place or " through transplanting. Based upon the arbori5t reports, staff is 00 k PLANNING COMMISSIC17' STAFF REPORT 17, 14263 - E.G.M. .' MOPMENT P Ociober 11, 1989 Page 3 ioI recommending that set teen (17) trees (most jy; Red Irordark} be preserved in pl act seventeen (11) gees bk;tray splanted elsewhere on-site, and seven .77} trees be ` moved and. replaced, The 'City's Tree Preservation Ord;nance requires '`` that replacement planting be of the largest =nursery-grown stoclt, available.. detailed listing of each tree is shoyz in Exhibit "H" "(rfererice" ndmbers`Correspond tom the` 1arscape . plan). The two Lemon trees are exempt; hence staff recommi6nds their removal., The appiica►t has volunteered to preserve,the large English Walnut tree near the north property line even though it too-is exempt: E. Gated Entrance the. applicant originally proposed a gated entraroeTcesign. Nowever', the site plan., does not afford sufficient depth to provide a visitor stacking and turn around area between the right-of-way and the gate. The applicant has agreed to delete the gate rather than revise the site plan. F. Environmental Assessment. part I of the Initial Study:has been completa by th �:appllcant. Staff rias,comple'ted Part It of the Environment Checkrlist and has found, no ,significant impacts on the environment as a result of this prodectl.— , , 111. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project will be consistent with he General an Rd the Development Code. The prodeGt, *Pith` the:., added .mitigation measures. will not b'e detrimental to thie public health or safety; or cause nuisance or significant, environmental impacts. In addition. the proposed use sand Site Plan, together` ' with the recommended Conditions of Approval, I are in: complidnce with the applicable provisions of the Development Code and City standards, IV. CORRESPONDENC-:- This items hasrb,�en advertised as a public hearing n t e ee Fails RReegorrtt newspaper;,\ the property posted with a supplemental notification sigp, and,;ngtices sent to. all property owners within 300 feet of the prd�ec!l site. ,) V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recom3end� the Commission adopt the attached Resorluftion"of Approval. gily' it d, e ner' BB:TG':js 64 PLANNING COMKISSIOl" STAFF ,REPORT Tf 14263 - VG.M, 1ELO*M 4.V ;^ October 11, 1989 Page 4 Attachments:; Exhibit,IWI Site utilization Exhibit "S" - Site Plan u. Exhibit "C" - Tract Map_14263 Exhibit "O" - Grading Plan Exhibit "E" - landscape Plan Uh.ibit 'IF" - BuAlding Elevations Exhibit "G" - Flonr Plans Exhibit "H' - Tree Removal Legend Resolution of Approval for 1T 14263 with Standard Conditions Resolution of Approval for TT 14263 OR with Standard Conditions a � 1` ram+ �♦ AVIV �s , Li < ♦ ('9 � 1 1 L..J 4r ` \ Ij. r, re r[,`\\ 4J 4J kJ\ y) \� lJ lJ'. lj 4J 4J 42 ' rn rl 1.JIL ��`E♦? �i is au tr,.'r 1 � + L rn ., J Pi r•� .J ` 4r 4J,, �� try,. CITY OF RIAN A AMONGA P ANNWG'DI.MIOIV it IM3 ,: I E SCALE: .r. erairr .l IIq .•.. v .....,.«.... ��...� ..t•.. Leos Io:: .ws...•r w. 4 1P.7 t"Por. Lot 2116T taaC.aw4a wnae II 1 Na e—i lO s cu BO' \\\ • v 0 K:!iit a 71 tit 011 Ss. tla r•�Gws iism aa. r �: ...�.. ` �.J_ 18 • a • ' \ 771 TOTAL to ` r L 409 [L,. 17 , ira owva..a>A a au aa�au " ' Rer Q d Dist ra wr fl �� i6 0 o.w•aere✓u�am..� t� " ter-\ � '�'.':'��.."'�`•••'. a �" � t ad O 13 15 'V. S \\.. w _.}. awr.�earwwalia•Mwa "v Q 2 w.wiwuww •w.wm 13 3 L, ' 1 1` ��� ao h .•�wr w....�. D O m W. 12 mew: Q 4.. �eo ao 17�i IE r V. 0 t ` T a DETAILM SUB PLA, N ...�... CREEK &E ViTTACHED1 10 cue"GR joss Assn xv�oc ,y� � �.`G7C+�iitD01016G4 f/701 IitAlN2-ffat �S o� �� d = odes # } e Sb( lqw a�..3Jim 9 .. 1 lift1 A ;J "�r� ,+ 1Z • 1 hp N( 5 to I ° �i�. ` .i � � Vtl r__ � .r* �r� •xr�y���7` ,n rv�."� q ot LU LU + a= i' ' r I w NV e` 'OF a AANCKOwig M N,pa A nTM PL. iMXG, "IOC 'T�]T. oawu"a TOT LOT RY STUCCO WALL --� -- — —' ris ' CRASH GATE I COW..ACM,SOIL •,of _ �irNh ROLLED^..,IM6 � N �7 2 1� .l ^YdG41T PSkd FENC -zouw11h'MASONRY PLAST ¢ •t LO`O.C. � L r < Q v G� tl�l (0 y co --J 4ONRY. STUCCO WI'41-L R�rCAL A G WAIL. ® ^�7 -ENTRY GATE% PEDESTRIAN LFK ri SPECIAL:PAYING •' TO FLOOD CONTROL TRAIL 3 AIONE 0 DIRECTORY R + WR0,UGR4T IRON FENCING RECREATION AREA ' with MAS,NRY PLASTERSPOOL at!0'txc• _ 1 30. SPA �+s; ®AR-B-OM AREA with WOOD.TaELlaS " +d• •. DFIM1114 AN t COMPACTED SORE. 1 with SOILED CRRRO tier .,• MASONRY STUCCO WA u> cm OF. MNICHO, A CONGAIMEXHIB I'I'E1Vt, 4 ♦ � i ' ®�a .�Y �1�� L •7 J C lww man_+s r ��� •�I�' ��: � 4 + � � , pal ... 'Yl I @ �i s 9 ^ G Uw cam:.: tl L 1 :fLryt , x I {, q tam k" y 1. + {d0 `r KOK G1,ng, I1 50 Nil ye y � \ •.r II a I k � � �. V J» � •tr � ti f � ry 1 (� l�• .Jr F+� s� M t� 1 �Lurra urir :� MrrrvrH L rii ti r < r: A III � Pto. Name Ile ht so Or 1 Rpy-red(ronbark 35' is, 10, Remove> Ave 2 Rosy+red ronbaix 25' 10, 7" Remove 3 Rosy-red(ronbark 25' 10, t' ti Rosy-W Ironbark., 35' 15i 8" r f# 5 Rasy<re t Ien4'rk 20' 15' 6" Remove $ 5. 110sy4ellronhark 401 15' 9" it 7 Rosy-red Ironbark'',' 20, 10' 6" it 8 Nosy-red tronbark '' 25t 15' 9" z !t 0 Rosy-red Ironbark is, 40 I( 10 Rosy-red tronbark 25' 15' P I I Rosy-red lronbark' 30! 15, a" #12 Rosy-red lronbork 251 15' 711 E 13 Rosy-red froxbaric 20' 10, S" 1''4 Rosy-red Ironbark 20, 10, 5" )t*' 15 Rosy-red Ironbark 35' 20P 8" Remove 9L 16 Rosy-red Ironbark 30' 15' 6" f 17 ",tosy-red(rohberk 351 20' 8l' k'+F i9 Rosy-red lranbark 25! w 12" Itemove ,-.jf-19 Rosy-red Ironbark 20' id' a" Remove # 20 Rosy-rod lronhark 40' 20— 10- �e,y¢ 21 Rosy-red(ronbark 481' 15' a" Remove R# 22 Rosy-red tronbark 35' 15' 8" Remove +h# 23 Rosy-red tronbark 40' I5' 13" Remove fe* 24 Rosy-red Ironbark 30' 15' 911, Remove N of 25 Rosy-red tronbark 25, 15' 87 Remove �r, 26' Rosy-red lirenbark 30' 15' 11" Remove *IN 27 Rosy-red tronbark 35! I5' lt" Remove ,F�et 28 Rosy-red(ronbark 25, 15' 10" Remove &11`29' Rosy-red Ironbark 25, 10, 9" Remove Xjt 30 Rosy-red Ironbark 20' 10, S" Remove 4tX'31 Rosy-red(ronbark 30` i5' 10" Remove itk 32 Rosy-red Ir6bark 30, Remove $t*33 Rosy-red(ronbark 351 20' t0" Remove # 34 blexican Fan Palm 351 10' 16" 35 Nex(can Fan Palm 36, 10, IS" w N 4 36 Lemon 15' 15' 9" Remove t' � 37 Lemon, IS' 20' 15" Remove ( ' ,Yf*-30 sbemel Ash SV - v„}' 70" Remove 1 ,} 39 English Walnut: 50' 60' 22" CcrxClN.pi� ;t►*- 40 Eucalyptus 40' 20, 17" Remove It** 41, 4AU.Slqtcrjgt4 351, 35' 28" Remove 42 sir/Ycv, t' 40' ' 45' 350 ;°43 A LIP. t i' 30+ 25' 3b" Removal Based apron te1 ftrist reports,staff rsexsmmends the foitowing: s ;0 Preserve In place. ?` MA-Transplant eisawhove on-site. lorrsove ip „,. ►` RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COKMISS10N OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, :CALIFORNIA APPROVING 'TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 1420 AND RELATED TREE RS40VAL PERMIT 89-58 FOR THE DEVELOMENT OF'32 CONDOMINIUM,UNITS ON 3,35 ACRES OF LAND LCIATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF CARNELIAN STREET AT VIVERO S;REET N TyE,,mEDIUM RESIDENTIAL 0�I51RICT (8-1$";DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND THE FLOOD,` CONTROL DISTRICT '(A PROPOSED MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL, DISTRICT), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APNs'207-022-54 AND 64. A. Recitals. (i) E.G.M Development has fVq,a 'an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No 14263 as C•isJibed in the title. of this Resolution. t�ereinafter, in this Resolutioh,y,.the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application". (ii) On the 11th of October, 1989, and continued to October 25, 198'9; they Planning Commission of the City of Rancho,. Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing-on the application and concluded. said hearing on that date. All legal prerequisites to the 4�option of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the. Planning Commission of the City of Rarwho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission<hereby' specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A. of this, Resolution are true•a:nd correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Co rnission during the above-referenced public hearings on October 11, 1989, end October 25, 1989, in,luding written and oral staff reports, together with i public t£':cia�v., this-Comnission hereby specifically finds as follows; l { The application applies to property located on the west. sid,4 of Carnelian Street at Vivero Street with a street frontage of T04 feet and lot depth of 346 feet at the north end and 115 feet at the south end; and (o) The northern half of the project site is presently Improved with three (3) `.single family homes and one (1) garage, the southern half of g, the Project site is vacant; and tti (c) The property, to ;the north of the project site contains sfsgle. family homes, the property to the south is vacant, to the east are r single family homes, and to the west., is the Cucamonga Creek. Channel.. get xr, C PLANNING. COMMISSION RMLUTION NO. TT 14263 - E.G.M. ,DEOLOPMENT October 25,; 1989 p Page 2 3. . Based upon the substantial evidence prey 'ntedti to thjs Commission during the above-referenced public hearing �.4"upon tne.specific findings of facts set forth in.paragraphs 1 b'nd 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as folioWs.: (a) The tentative tract will be consistent tiWith the General Plan, Developmont Code,. aod specific plans; and (b) The design or improvements of the tentatiVe tract will bp P consistent with the'Generate Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and (d) The design of the subdivision' is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable'injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and ' (e) The ientativa tract Is not 11kel'y to cause 'sor, ous public health problems; and (f) The design of; t73e tantative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large,`_ maw of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4' This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been rer,dwed and considered i.n .compliance 'with the California Environmental Quality Act 'of 1970 and, further, this. Commission hereby issues a. Negative Declaration. S. Based uporv,the, findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this ifommission hereby, approves the application subject to each and every conditio6 set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions. attached hereto; end incorporated herein by th7s reference: Planning Division: (1) - The applicant; shall,provide for a future trail connectfon to"the Cucamonga f.reek Channel. This shall include. a pedestrian connee:tion 4eading from the project site to the Wiest property line;. howe4er, the access,;point shall be gated; and' locked until such.tfine as an agreement is made 'between the City, f ha Corps of Engineers, and the Fl.opd Control Tlistrii which wit `allow for , an extension of the ,regional trail system_adjacent to this site. The connection shall be'designed to the`'satisfaction of the City Planner and City Engineer prior to the issuance, of building permits.. PLANNING COMMISSION. RESOLUTION NO. �f TT 14263 - E.G.M. 'DEVELOPMENT October 25, 1989 Page 3 (2i) Landscaping along the west side of -,Carnelian Street shall conform to;.the Carnelian Street Beautifick., n Concept and shall be subjec-e`to..review and approval by the,, City planner and the City Engineer Dior to the issuance of builil.ing, permits. (3) A final acoustical analysis shall be prepared for review, and approval by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. Should the acoustical analysis recommend 'the construction of a;5csund retention wail along Carnelian Street, the design :of the "wall Lshall be approved by the Design Review Committee prior to the issuan�e of building permits. (4) Tree Removal Permit 89-58 is approved as follows: (a) Trees No, 3, a, 6-14, 10;'17, 20, and 39 shall be preserved in place. (b) Trees No. 1, 2, 5, 15, 15, 22-31, 33, and 40 shall be preserved by, transplanting elsewhere on the site.; (c) Trees No. 18,; 21, 32, 38, and 4,143 shall be removed a►c r.. replaced with the largest nursery grown stock ayallabley as determined by the City Planner. (d) Trees No. 34 anon 35 shall be `preserved in place or e�,ih " transplanted elsere on site. (e) The location of ail trees to be preserved in place and new locations for ur'ansplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans, (f) ,The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's _. _ recommendations-,- regarding preservation or transplanting measures, (9) Those trees required to be preserved in p,i,sice shall be protected, in accordance with MuniciP l 1od Section 19.08.110. - (5) Prior to the recordation of the f=, p'map or the issuance'of building permits, whichever comes first, the applicant shall consent to, or participate in, the esvWlishment of a IM,ello-Roos Community. Facilities District pertaining to the project site to Zol provide in conjunction with the ,applicable School District for the construction and maintenance ` of necessary school facilities. However, if Lany School 'District; has 'previously established such a,;'Community Facilities District, the applicant shall, in the the alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the terri¢o`ry of such'existing District prior to the recordation of the #inal map or the issuance of ouilding permits, whichever comes' first. 11 Ems PLANNING COMMISSIM'RESCOTION TY 14263 -`E.G.M. DEVELOPMENT October 25, 1989 Page 4 Furtherr if the affected School D[strict has not formed a Mello- Roos Community Facillties District within twelve months of the date of.'approvril of the ;project a.nd'pritir to the recordation of the final map or issuance; of.building permits,for sait project, this corditioWshall=fie�feemed._nul.l- ant' void,,,_If the developer and any affected school districts reach a` private agreement, this condition shall be deemed null and,void,' tihis approval is specifically contigent upon approval of General P,An. Amendment 89-O2A and Development District amendment 87-12, a\clange in density from Flood control to Medipm Resident�:i7 (844 duelling units per acre), Engineering Drvist:iQ,: F� (lj A,y�X, �1Iieu fee as, contribution %to the future ;undergrounding of r th&, <existing overhead utii. tics (telecommunication and el1,ct)'ical except for the 66W eit4ct-lcal) on the opposite ;side o � tarnelian Street shall' be Paid to-the City prior to approval of the .Final Map.' The fee s:lall be ones-half the City adopted unit,)4mount times the length o the project frontage. (2) The existing overhead utility service lines crossing, Carnel9 Street shall be undergrounded, or eliminated. AM (3) Street improvements on the west side of Carnelian Street north and !-::uth olf .the'-project site shall .be constructed generally in conformance with the preliminary traffic plan dated June 15, 1988,� as, approved by'the city Engineer. (4) Construct a right tern pocket-;forth of the project driveway on Carnelian Street which is eleven (11) feet wide and 230, feet longs, including the taper. Install a catch, basin north of the right turn_pocket, with sufficient capacity" to offset the decreased capacity` Caused•by the ersc*oachmnt of t`xe driveway into the,existing thannel. The right=4f-way`lne shall parallel tha Curb line seven (7) feet behind the curb face. The sidewalk shall be lcatat least five (51 feet behind the curb. (5) The project driveway shall be redesigned - without a gated entry, Either Combine' the two driveway medians into one continuous one,or delete them. Provide straight curb, lines on both the north and south, edges of the entry drive aisle. ` (6) Install a traffic signal at the intersection of Vivero Street and Carnelian Street, The developer, shall receive :Systems Develo ent Fee credit and.reimbursement for seventy-five' (7$) percent oi the cast of the signal, Ifapproved by" y City Council. 11. - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 14263 - E.G.M. DEVELOPMENT October 25,`1989 Page 5 ,1 (7) The Carnelian Street sidev{alk shall be property line adjacent. (8) An in-lieu fee as'contribution to the future reconstruction of improvements on the wrest side of Carnelian Street south from the project entrance to the existing curb nd gutter terminus shall be th paid to the City prior.to the issuance of Wilding permits or Final Map approval:,,Wlhichever occurs first. (9) Flood protection rtfpasures shall be provided :a10 g Carnelian Street genera ly a. ' recommended in the preliiainary flood Report and as ver�;fied by`,ta _,,Final Flood Report approveO by the City Engineer. (10) It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM .Zone A ':jdesignation removed for the project area. The developer's eny`ineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, hydraulic/hyd,rologic calculations, etc. Preliminary approval shall be obtained from FEMA prior to apps-oval_of the record map or issuance of building ;permits, whichktiver occurs first,. The designation shall be officially removed prior to occupancy or improvement avaeptance, whichever occurs first. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption IMF of this Resolution.' APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1989. PLANNING jOMMISSION OF THE CITY OF' RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman r=i ATTEST: Brad. Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission' of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution Was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the. 25th day of October.1989, 'by the following vote-to-wits AYES: COMMISSIONERS`: NOES: COMMISSIONERSi ABSENT: COMMISSIONE61s: z. �} x P 5t Y LY �w.N p. a 2.. M � M pQ . e'�ppaea' w.�. ue of `..'.N.� ""`h' N .. m.'G',v�.`d' pep CC �r1 N 4 4.r Yi giwpy{, g y CY R4q tl Y9Q= rVL V pd<�V 6 . Q ■w�.ti�u ~4w+M� 4RY CGG .�..`�[V OM T. N Ps } }.. + g: vQvnns ycy� @Swf YeyL�y p4.Y 4l:u�y iCCnOy.�. Nl4 'Ltg�c f wG+,V V 0.aJ Vb..w-"�.., Yi LG LI UNRip�$C1OOiY� ��y� C, .p«Q C A drys C y Y N a Qp'9 Qp r'�1 yuya.l. ie�e. 9.�,G+0 YV yZtEQ vJ3wN1 yC Y�VYID �11� L'1!d $. B. P O.� YC=^�1 1 NY 4Y. tllC4a0 Y �CW .� Y S —N { . q,.mYp Ns•wc � a .o.acs grs '�g any ° �+.3l ma 'm:�•ti aNia.Y't wNw gr a`c^ p ,a v„b,,.�5_ 33s. Y'.= a t`r$ off+: ae ► $ Gott No�: sSS ua a'+"op, �N Y�3>rr Yww �� tgY � �5.. R•-.oM'�L �� CY ..i�� NU w 9VvC uy S� y er° gig -I-af'E+`1Zlz iY '�C N a+,�Gr+ »�~ NY$ Q9 ��• 4F ppVM.L M'ilEK 0 r/ .54 Mls w GON v"p iGii Is _� ar G P M W J$t Q C :ice a 4i�' .. x 4w CY'sa1PNMO.ir Mwi 1323 It" � YP�YY Hu IS-1 ppA4.ww=N /0 �.v "'YS O6.Q Sw=4 � ` V'pQQp3 A . Au y44� D�P� 9 y�G V.L w-43 tl :i Y Y+pw �� y Na�,r ;5.-Z YYPqZ.� Z All :^ .Z�.4 zo dr-.1L 9 N W a v y"M Ti a..'c M^'L .'ti m� rp �YZwV Z. av� ivy.. do,s 'i� d $' w�� a Y yy� }$�4 Q �/ �rw Y~ , a9 �CQG�1►.{3w 1'r i'.y/Tq Y3 1N, y O,YL� W ppy pn, a�:r'�" Yi�v q? Y.�."'- �.np� at. ;c; • m*r+ ,c'"' co Njj YPC 'HMO GO Nw�iY N'iP! CNV,N yC M=4.h 4:6 at. p� �Na� Na {�� 4]toY Y9CSN mt+ywf ~ y«�O`ger,1, }P:3. Vsi ., II'�. W�Na. QI V e qg wN Y rYjpm 'giz PNc..� L^ O4 YYM�YC }. Mw Y+ p b1 'y yPP.q� ffe*^ Mw. Q N�V1�1" •�Y1 4'S w CiG yin' a WC*Q�. Va V �^� b .pit[ L C Oy"„ �POLWi1� YrN , Y r^M yr �alC QN 45+1 � 7 - 7wY.�9 Nay cN wY:Yvy .11�*2sgY "N 13,i3 M yVY y c 4?x4k O L43 i 9xrc" 2 .4 ' ` �Lsm &.3 Rr. ^MTSUVA 9,va25 �~qe �. .� N0 ca N WtO:TL� COY y(YQ�j. r.tip r. � +ypPq^��l.T � �Z ` YL. O yp w �wW Ku�i 411 .ea4i��o lb 3 g ..Hf a 3 ET— Hsi urlzi lqaq r'' FL+y4 AS �S� ` -r- Naa 4 � N LQ qO MY Qa M� C~ qHw�^ 45 NM &M.TFM '21 all LU Hit it Zia- 0.31140 .f8 ztf EH $L- '_ •r•�t z* « rat a ~z a fa4i$p_eM � y�y�Ipmi.;4 w a 1C% C C.4 r� � � as -g �c wo UO-2 -21 :si .�+�iF �31 �` ly�i� AOL Yo w.�.tl CaM�+ye t. ~p4.w kWU UN A-S �Ys y` 1W � _�A hip �wf.$ hi p, .�:�n4g- w o» v "' v;s! +�..: v a u a :e+ac :i jtN�+ a 4, .� tyS+1p5i C 4,l°rtQ �NJbix�'^C' fig! ap+M �ggss T4�♦ �. N •'�� YeK C�,,���Z�C� �aC�� ",»per �Oq.� 1"Y I °i �u 11 4. ~ c-^-�' aaa� 0. mid+ "ai g°fi wak,3 CE ..»u. v u.0 a'yySLr yp�"` Wc.. i„s +"- yY: »�.HN G"f. Mar �. y�p��rV!}q��, /{�{ Y r..«}�qq+i yytgy C Y » LW Q.✓Q./{ R :4Y VrM�tll C� �mR 1T' uNL�yLy x'b•R� +� V�I�MNM 4'M.pr. R- T&K.Q �+ K I+r4 GP.N FW O L 4 i C Q i k w Rol 'r�• C.4 S bt4 +Bw 1] n 1� .+, i� als ACC. � i�w.�q � •+~�. tt4 gyp. Ld^oq °X `ai L a ia�w QCQ .. 'JA jj `►u ai z r'} u w :� .�r� u is et ai a w� «,�go� �7 i� u� � � ��i a,+�5 E.m. v�`�, '� v� ;' ae + ♦wii aye. v x$. r .. P pr C YxC INA It f gE g�w ;a N�i� q� �`${+r 'all ip$..paler ' $ yy f� "en '°ate w w K 55 mad see 41 a ;�S YY $$HI is Iw ggg�� y Im v o dTo� LijN .�i J JY1w wQLC +.}� .VC•� ,' � 4 <M .<> L#Y� a ay.'R O O L.-R -L L_N r- N b V w�•4 0 �Y=Y � C L ,Gy p� ew L O Ca �$$qw yCwyy Y� M OYO � AYO.�M ypyyL Yw Y wyyY d ^L dNsy L�q,'jp VAS l4fff.111 W C4 16N' '�tlF•d,Y`� Q�•VOr..;'� ,4C�i <Ya .O.Vpp � y OLM � ~ ::wOr �i W.G•6 �-C 3- Sol a O.w •�^J O ,OL f..I Q d ps a Vp diiLLY qy yy rtl • Ytt Cy� �~•J�G ..�. C:1 ^ M Y C �q�■r {��{ G ��11 co<• wGOw :;NOd .. ysM gCw�ad ^_b<ytqbV Sw (Q Y yOpNyy c y N OyN CywyG Ap4.O ~LVyW oy.-'- L:y HZ— yo Y 1�Y Y.r�y �« C �OY Ca d y� 0 O � g9WyY0 <�L B �Ci• �YMw.n• Y.y M Y O 'AL W.C�Rr -:V •Y F.. ^g9Huy ra� <6 yra� i1,CVY40 d•� f <V V122— • Ol �.C� Ma Y 9QS 9_ yyyVyy•yV.M gY p ue YaY CL Pic Nd C 'OL N�•C •n^Y N V OM O V• 6 N 4M O vFu ap • 4 Y E A a� G V C U V {6r C C p p N • /�{�� 66O� .dLY pG1 .q:VO OL�M_ elf, � :. Q��i M..nYy lam. Y:`� pV/u /\may q O d.�C Lw_ Gi L. �.. :1/� C ':• •Yw. Lw .w J Y tl.. O� �!, N V SYV N N •tl L 3w +c co yac wrly +' �. 'C • Qyy Qr�! C,C w C vp N 6J Yp'�' C. V O y p V.NOCL y t 01•U ®.�C �..A Y.YYtlMlll q^G • ML aCS� Y O�Hgi ^V• il. b..f9'`� MQr Sb C_C OMB . .'G`.w s. s •.Y,,Te SEA ?�py]�� C 2q 6 �`@$�r Otl'N ,pO.O G •tlSC 1. Ob f V l '{, `area-e'p. ggg P Y A •.�cv �� y�ytl you �. 6Ca�p L � '�s: 'YC�G £Y 'tl EGG, �•�` y- p I!. rL�N �aF. i- N 4.i ]g� P V Nd$LC N Ne7 L .N.r':�M N1.! 9r •8 rQ c� ® ffi ^p '.S_S acr{ram yG �YQL rbi OL• �av 84a`•. j C po9��•' a HL M gLj YyyVy Gq : {�,��f i.a b Y�Qw(� VN o Lam.L 1 O'...6f e.. aC �..: `tiv6 ^. 6. F�N 60Y. C�:ftC �YYG tl r1MIA qq N,.. �Cp g4 e .� 9 p N E �N� ai4 a C�0 Cffi„^® ^. W�t p Gtl Y®o qi ; 0 !!p AG SN LiI ryS MW •w+, Y L=T SC� ` N� Ys +9gg i� L V � �; •Bt Lg,gV. tii "oc 0€3 _ «o.. rd' •'m.a aaaAu.�+�'i� �'aW r �� yq� � u v ... e p� Q�MM YLG C V:+26 r C,O Y ZZ. �. G■ VOd ,^ 90 Y >9Y L r Nr Vy r^ �V`I �C GV V. �pO� le d�C N w�&C� $q �� V yyN T Q E CCq•��� '.`Y C�Y ytl.Q KOC.Mg�C 9Y.L M N a ygji OMy :W O - weo yyNp9 y�ea'��z„ ryyc�a may: I p,4 q.N Cw�p�d N RMI V6 j V 'Y ` O L N p514 0 9q� 6N1 9 Yc a o a v ec •� g..�.. ... oe o� d cbii .,z atV^NaY �V 0.6 N �m is irk Y N Ma. a 0 ® gh t VJ q wow A-2 S�:.e as a g i-wm eco uoaM� M L®. w�g� EayG s�p�� Y� OGbiB Oqq. yGb YaC O. y�GN ^ N.. C�� wiwu., 4. tlOi ��6M OM.. �V g .O Ps OpM -pi CNC p `4q �l0$pv1�y+�Y Al y�(@�t.. MpLY �y O�oQ:6 k 8 510 �O^Cl �i Np�66V •6 D :.: N.I�.Y� CRC $v u:C ® � g ass 6 Oi�COp t BP V iq gazz »S e''ui tC:000 g` C60Mtlg Qh } NGN Cii p� Ea:b76 Ntl.. EQY iyi C i �VNr� iiC4 �O.fr�L o nTi. ate N 4 .qt uno� ,GL,� ac�� � ai yo'�n.4's°�' Cµ '� $ ..:• ». Qeu :So �� N dG L L..0 tl 4� � r 6w4.Lr� D � C � .• �•�1O V L^• N 4.O� YM Wz. Ca: Czy3.0 ad`o Vw•1 La.T ^L N �W.' QI�CK � .[ N Q� OI .CC l ~N F� �•L.N�' w.,o O Y y W �V gfiry N C L ^J O,�N0g3 pp aye .j gNOpl OwM; Vj b�aC N9 C C V q La Vdy.GM TA N= yOrr C uV Oy� L:� �yC/ �.,O35 i q'y LPM4 W .. LVO Y �� OIL «w_ CM Poyi'. P.V y N �y its 90opMW L GuL: dI y p.Q �1^ •+ V a R L CGS N �Y., L$ a.� t s•� �•. Co., ^ ¢QC V \O +co V ...w a q 0 G "�yyO{{ ut*Fj.0 4' N^ L q�1 d 'yp^�� —9- pad (��w./.y� -aN A� 2 s~•.L C 6wd �M Y a'c L }uWcy tC 'OO�w� ata.". c*w'nw" n G�y a5 a�.e ' aaG -R/. Val G S C CaC Nwy�^ (pA q^W. C N•p yy P4 tl_C C. •V/M $4 60d ��q O VYii VaC V -;s q ��QQyyii ■■ pp eµNL O L LV yV.�tiM MN Ny �� C^. CYy�VNf Nµ VrS Y:1. ONV q.y q Md M.V•.+C $YN VC VO: C. L d{{• C ,L d1(! V V gg` q a a LO den5's� u+v �:S av a'a w«wiiu •i'rs �3e .e0 c �� .�., t"w8�5 koa» � v 0 m Q� •�4y 0 lV 1•i o y GIN y 61. Z 9,0 YV ,ACM O=0 MZP I11 OIV 81 M.s1 C:fl 1 G a pp Vy o jj ..'.;Is em 1 LC Y a^Tf V N y , A N, q4N tVy W y� Y •�Cyr pp CC y �1� V p10 M O i1 L N h p q. 5666� �d L Q gL •'Lam . V� ii.' �S 40 ��j .§ b �.. o a'-u .r-• {� p� G "'�' NM'. ^V� •g`R C. � � � ^ . YEV 0S'Mv ga �Lf lw 41 jQQQ} O � O ♦+ A y 'p 9 TTTTTT a h�' °y� N% 71 n I �y�yg 3gp « . W y VV M ICE JI J 5 I q �u N of « E s}, N Om ° ,V 4 ol ks w d.4 yy9 YLr� •rV. O �N O•�' MCd' L Lr Y C I• °�R YY. A L IyyLy pV 4 Y��,. y Cn.■ fN� w G. Ati:CN �Y. �° p, iwJOL6 �C N': A « 9.. 6 N 4LY0 4 �Cyrt'�. G f C�41 IY J�... �uM9. A L 2-3 �Yi �.. ¢Tsee CeVg 2� id, 24 su- Slfl gal z a N N� w M p yj O i gy jma syyNc Gv.. � y g. '~L 637� N.N �Md N ©w 1_ d w g 11 �Ya�a.y. gMm^�� Qpt �yy3` :she •gpy'$ uT w-v. F yYYLy.0 O�CN �jil Lp yAi y@ aA N °qiy ®w.:2 Oa N 1�Nw$A K �6 6f1 .NbN rr. V�'3 K6 al ai 4a tS U®ir P• �� Y g v1 A 3 RES04UTION'NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCN40NGA PLANNING COR41SSION , OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, .CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTPTIVE ' TRACT 00. 14263, THE DEVELOPMENT OF 32,CONDOMINIUM UNITS ON.3.35 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE :WEST SIDE OF CARyELIAN;,STREET AT VIVERO STREET IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS, ME PER ACRE) AND THE FLOOD CONTROL- DISTRICT (A PROPOSED `SUM RESIDENTIAL OISTRIi;T), AND MAKING_, FINDINGS IN r?'PORT THEREOF - O 207-022-54,AND 64.1 A. Recitals. (i) E.G M. Development has filed -an .application for the approval of Development Review -No. 14263 as 'described in the ; title ` of this Resolution.. Hereinafter in thin, Resolution, the,subject Development Review. request is referred to as "the application". On the 11th of October,- 1-989, and continued to October 25, 1989, ttie P1anniN7:; (bmnission of` the City of Rancho Cucaaiong'a conducted a meeting on the application;and concluded said meeting on that date. (iii) All 'legal pre,)*, uisites to the adoption of this, Resolution have'occur-pd. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and. resol :o,by the Planning 'Commission of the City,of Rancho Cucamonga as follows. 1. This Commission hereby specifically Finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A. of this Resolution are true, and correct. 1 upon substantial 2 Based:' evider�a presented to this Commission ! daring the above-referenced meetirgs on October 11, 1969 and October 25, 1989, l including �itten ark=oral sta f-r�parts, this::Cor:ni lien-:her_ specifically_ finds as follows: K IIt , .r. (a) The application applies to: property 'located on the west k side of Carnelian Street at Vivero Street with a strek'`1 frontage of 634 fleet and lot depth of 346 feet at the north end and 115 feet at the south end; and (b) The northern half of the project site is presently improved with three (3) single family homes and one (1) garage, the southern half of ` the project site is vacant; and E f (c) The property to the north of- the project site contains single family houses, the property to the south is vacant,` to the east; are single family homes and to, the west is the Cucamonga Creek'Channel., t. � 6 l , i r. PLANNI146 COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 14263 OR - c G.M.:-gEVELOFMENT ! October 2511 1�989. cl, , ?age 2. Affak r, 3, Based upon t6,� substantial evidence presented to this Commission . during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings-'of fC't set forth In paragraphs 1 and 2,' above, this Co�mnissi6n hereby finds raid concludes as follows, sf` (a)l That'+he proposed project Yifl be Consistent with, the; objectives of the- Ge,r+aral Plan, arx! J obi ect , (b) That the' proposed use will be 1n'accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes, of the district in.,which-the site is located; and c=. �- ;.. (r) That.the .proposed. use is in compliance with each of the applicable provision`ij of the Development Code; and (d) That theL pinposeo use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be tAeirimental to the public health'; safety, or welfare, or materially 'injurious to ,properties or improvements in the vicinity. !4 4. This Commission h:" by finds and certifies tftt-the project has been reviewed and 'consideled .._ coiVI iance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and./'further, this Commission hereby issues- a,"Negative Declaration. 5. ` Based upon the find: gs and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, `, and.4 above, thit.Comnission hereby approves the application subject to each and every 'condition set, forth ;below 'and, in the.,attached Standard C\;�ditionsi attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. (1) All conditi:ans'of approval for 'Tentative Tract 14263 shall apply., (2) The glass block.element shall be removed and replaced with' standard`windo�s: (3) The potM_sheti elemanf"on the'ri9 t amid Teti side eievati6fis° of Build' Type 1 shall be extended. (4) A' teittr#ed paving, treatment or concrete band shall be provided along the ,front 'of all .garages to 'create a pedt,str an patW leading to the recreation area. (5) Landscape islands shall be provided between ail garage doors. (6) Security gate access to the project shay be deleted due to back of adequate.,staeking distance, i: f PLANNING''COMh12SSTON RESOLUTION NO'. TT�4263.OR E.G.M. DEVELOPMENT Octb6er 25, 1989 ;Pa9e,_3 l� 6. The Secretary to this Cogmission shall certify to the:adoption of this Resolution. f' APAROVEt .AND ADOPTED THIS. 257H DAY.OVtOCT08ER 1989 r PLANNING 'OF-RANCHO, Me OVA BY �. Larry T. McNieChairman �. ATTEST• Brad Bul ler,' ecretary I, Bra4' Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the 'City of Rancho CUcambnga, do hereby:.certify that, the foregoing iesolution. was duly and regularly introduced,,-passed, and, adopted by the Planning "Comni"ssipn of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at at regular meeting of the'Planning CommissidnAeld s on the 25th day of October:, 1989, by the following vote-to'wit: AYES: CO'MISSIONERS; NOES't COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COWISSIONERS:- r ris N p�C G y1 Y.. O. -.C.`L pJY ` N yiY,i �:Cy O� qq* Z 60Y 4 ti pR yq Y� y L' M yy vc45-1-LAJ {�o �.y�yos Ny(o���.+ .c6is,V Q O.�C I T Y J..L/�q N L O w yyC.p-yy Y 0. 'plc ®pu t' O yCO>4G.�C=Vp'b�■ pG+EO V�tYlO a6C:Yti �TQ _ ntl �.- stCYd a N a 9 rrGpG y�y _p g p �Gp gqyq•6 Ccc,yti •�iY^Y 3{H1— Y Ca iSC OM:O�M C=. �gy •S ]iYV." MM{OY�^ t—p.E U4CV.�{@{QP OYyIiai gC MM 3�NG.L OW Y"q ¢ ,OOOYN..C.vl.- �a Cr".bM CONA is x O. YM y �i Y ��.6 �� SLR GGG4 yf; Y �y Sa��v.N��14a oa��4 H.N� a��,u 'rT'ge 9.�N•-a ,.. ppba �C O Q11015 � GN i V QO p yNq 4 f4J C SE!,z N ypp}�M� +R �p 6 r aYY q 0. L. >�SY�Z01 ON Y� u 4:'.L a� C.`^+ C°" ru�N �Ir ^�}j`�'LQnM.i Q{ibM V^ 4'1 4b��V` sN �Y■t L.i Or 6 q Yy�OgNpCUSLu�Oa YO NG..ypCA� NCHp 6wpLp Wyy A�}d� JyVC Y+�pt®pin$,... + i w �$a _ C CS _p3 oos b�?N9 yb N'Ri . -uwo3'Tsw���'i,�. o oo'M rc4 � :cas$.'§'� .ao oa. ru aZ'ay. •(-J.S^! ^ , i �.rd s :tl yy sRNtl�yNq�'C�:� :s}r 4a N V u qN. i 90 O E S CCyM O Y E ��M1ip VN�Y of `o TN, R�aQ$ b.. ,.+u44 M' :L O a�V a i'I =OJ 0�3 ts- its R t yay` q •Vp �1 y pN Rai �iH a row$ oaHn.'aca, uF ra ��o,� �a"�.� os"�i W NGCti• ~C VAC JJJTIIILI�` V.@�9 ig �' OQ.: w �Ob 4 ppw W -g�:$ _�■Q L v•nw�r aN ev M �. x. Qr 9.0 � T '$y VMaR�Nww{ : �C•" 4.V..: 1. 0 p Cp aD4 L� Ns pM H 7 A A"y OC. MFV•� y�•!4 G � a G "" "1 H �y 4 u< Q M V�D•W L �T ^�V� tiG$ � •�rGA C R: �� a"�'}' ,pH Sao` y ySs N µ'G.Lb 1.`RH rYauq M 1 4 :4 Yy4 A p p H p'M 1• ���1YY Za Ly,Cti YdC YSff � ,qq® c"tNp A4 i6'=VM�yag. N 04i C yVy4 L�'Cl pO • 4Of. M�K+O : �Veeyp�t TzaQNY4•.:4 4'•'-V'4. .t ff' i.C�.b4}'Y 4 ++� CaMR^ OrjpVYwp.. RNJ CV4" 8".�A_a .—.s w�'�,Y dT�L.Y k iCM d�. gy~g.$«�c'S' i+a►.E. v ,u. a ucl6. .�.^rc� Hy ,ppu•° f. c c^ q4+^-'� _rSa ±q¢4 '$.y. �Or L.. «_yti V•GV 'T .�,SQg ff + t i is r p aIM! ?P gre a�-'Di �$ a pp�x`Rg "' VLigH aaxGs gz ;+s Y uqN`sqw. �Z .4 s• aM Y M .0 sr Nl... M A r 1ae Y '$M�^ ��9993� Wv E pp w r• N �y � =d„ V 4M4 1; L M Y 4Taw Q.Cg Lou- NpvO V C Nay �s �Z` rQ 9 s & 4�~N^' t� MN F?�:O • 1. k 'f.4 rq�•.'iG� !�Y N�. � H�.C., �'�• RISIN n'K1 .1 a Rai & :y+$. Ad E, It� �aao ca}C �y� o$go��l}lo L'lO.te {-4-5 c LA Lro INCN C�Oti ~cUL .•�.� L« ' ��s L�A�C sa�3.1 I. Y r Yyy R. 2 Yro Yw cN of s+' c.t. 1.t N H7NW iey C R` � OL �b44¢N�IIL �HNM.. �Mg. _ ,GC ' #! ,y H 9... F1'le2 w`� 4Hap2 AIVI LOd pYN Qi y6� 'fL� �.O VYxi Y«.wL LM� 1+Y1.. it4 Et 4 Ca ¢C C L a. p gig 'aec NN� N �a~"`3 ". Cp `ovwc vac Zff Nn4".. gFa»$H-L.c�g o.N,y ai $llr^ Oq' O3'a s'Ytm C or,n.� pCC.D0. a atu i{ u«I. Y ONpp� Q b.�y�t �, • N El OW wo UgAfIwN �' 'c ^g NV to ti�4_LN „ •m7O 4. 4 La DY46N c�rdi L.V Nicu OIY qRj}„ '.✓<n .`oo �"Y 1 fir' p'ei� oo sN o9C.aa+�:cq�Yra «aY'ala .� yy w�„Kcc N eY gNe`e M 6 Y O! R O O l I.. ^N V Y ro H 4 S w p w. ®ttR O M. yy ^S e O�. +L1U^w WV �N �.0 OL Rp .µ'me p.��NN.VHQNC9«C Y 6M R. a L Q4{y L Yr YEN>N L k. C«Y LHp. +r CL dNt 0� C CEO AT I- Y aRi Yp Y �y � t V 6 NO L tL Ly CYON rCF it fay �« My V {{�tt,, oCCYv.L.°. L/�NNN Y,N� i.'.N NO F"NL itV Wn.�0190[RN O.O <9Y. fIL.O+cO 4N; Aft ob�I arc °sac A'e ' %,8T cg' aS g� I.La .tee •Ii^_II Yq :S x Ra eNii s.Lm'o LnT S^"4e OG cRY 4 LY «ie� Ll'� 4, PY SS�Nu A.- .s r S., ,9 L Rg ss if.sg ►'=vc SE o tf L t b�i� OIN N ba:V s=n 1 .,*� CY N O r• .� [1# 95 Oca Fs b ✓ Ca�.Y@pL^ .* �.. a:..�:ti O�IOUNT p �Y«N�� R A 4 •E+� Y_J. g �y Oqp H L�� � NNd 1 2(Yg� _ i R «N, w r,.Ln{ (I.�. sQ y R NYS OI i' N �ZTV its v:CIA �24 , Y.49ppL1 �0$ +f My M9 Y� _M U. � � b4 Co @V� «aY� Y Q ,. $�. Q V N� m�1f��i� �CN R` � .y O .}�+ �7' "N C rat .M'l -its tx �cc o.'�'«.. L«•..• � O g,,� 'L L� s ry: am . �Itw e'{ �t�! s rw�., C C � 9! �Yr• 6 rR.R•�� V�4 _V m6� ?FppN SN 7 jr N y «A A ➢ ` R s� L s§,ua ~v� ICON it sv Lca.�aca $S - l�'.ngg L. . 0 �^ KTa� y" dip.p�.� yg��.Y••�.. uw H O Y=Y +w M Y O 1 1!Y L Y O O Amk 0 o Ygw Y- �$a> r N GY 08.2 W $'i'Y 8ai CMaV�'_ Lm'..'�` O9Ya y�j3yC^ +NsAAN = -CNN S,w..0 OMQG c'L N Y.�wV '^ 06 OWY CY -a V N+NNri w '='_`= Cac dz AL a yh obco c�«� �9ce o �qCY ^M YX& '4$Nr 4 Y� �xv .t'iV �yf" Yau Qgggy�.'Y� r C �pYZT. c S.rs.� gc3"'.q-� $�'� uc+A ��w� •«+c,g a, r'i � e o a.c;� a o+.rs.c gi"" •� 'C}' ,� v,+' Q.'v $ q=�y.,'a+. ^ "i,=� �+. c'y M a yy.�v ,.:� max YYpp o` > yRn 3.•.L ~)fG yM_.4VC U.0 � NNP.Vy=+LL 9m�V ��..y-o,R>y w+y, Y..... C •/C�� O iNr.U�' m, w Ar_ •� Yaa 1"....rkoC' �'�c .0 L+ppY• ,��w.N pia OQ�nY1s. 1' N '� N :6Nz O f 1 u'T&. K C -y Ii6 L + 1 �1� $� ! .� o.'O$$ �� 'r`•�> �. M .� q � M MY 4� miry M �ISC p qy Yew .. Yy d,G _ �y� OO yq� p ti y�4i , !fj 1 .4 nl 1=4 i 4qq tlf.A E C F> Yy as ki CL w r 7f� _ ^� 09 1�$Q r ip 1` e..l p3�� o y «ee ^e LAS 8 ,dam ^ � �y}s�j �n� y��jO ^ �p� Hit Awl Sul "'• w I-Sw 40P < i�4w 4w! :_ O M r V N 1�1 � Sao s4oe'�� He CY IL e � D� YdO�ti� �dY °� y� V VACIw^Vr wp. N)1 d N_y A Vr�L Y C 9 b Yw.�• C.�'V Y�Y; ■NW q 6 N Y U. ° L 1Ai{ aa-f_Nts �, V V•�� Y✓tT�H N� N V d� V V.. V A p co ^V:;:aSdE aN SOL u..yt °ac.A. ' 4Maj_Y4 Y ^. qM2 v w LO a c rJ' pe 04 i Y YAK 'L M�{i1 'O $yi Co` € w�4. g e d a $.rr$` e `cQ' ya 1L ta CC10 ;,HC, a w` w6 wwds. •'�=„Y �:® -g a` =vp Fla � +B '-suit ups St.. t L'°��� 66a`6 �'NMq+g.�3 MN �pg iON00. • Cw Lg0 !d� OC8ei .Y uidi d Yy all vr A OM = p �p �i Y{i 4S■ Y� Y O '. b v` 3� mi� �' d�ta $ s `� ♦ >w Epp d Yydp /pp� N V yo as -050 nos, �MO�yG 1VL G Nv L �ym Nw N6rByn ap Kp r� N YO.(gpgq. p� Rb. yy ! Y. j NO ills O Y 3. 9 `o L'a '.S ._:g&� $» ^�.. $ L' Ss " s „..Yt3 it _9$ g W V W • Y ps 4M 1 6iw�f c �� q�Yv �p4 w. N CC ^ py N � NCC SM 4uY CY god L'.N+ N pp OCcI CL. :N mix Y w+: aY .r q V'^V4: rJ a «e a ai p�pc CC Lr CA., �M�O ^ C(.1 -4f�I G.^. O L R q V LSJ : a V y V yy& C Y C U�... fO!U .Cd L A �C; LL Cy . - .. w ,N wag N-5 4- gNYO �w� WE, '� i�J!S.n M CYN V 4 V ` ^SW e^ cwu.YyY ca O�q y Mao aS000 p �« ^£ o�� a„ (6 �' Yus �y 4OwN G` p.;scr �9.LY N r�.C�. L^' 4xY Y-O CLf �•�� Yd •Ir^} ,b Q� Oa�1 `/ 9-4 s+�`�p yr 4'au c .. v..$'+ ^N wp a.n n i:r. a�.S 4� C Q �y ^L r�iVa GYG yLy� L YLy ^_ C= 9 LA N O Y V AS y t4 a V Y G {'o^' gr�Yi i4 ?Na me'µ` c "L� V:« w €2 ao st �c $ ss �.� oye .'ji �Y383 05. a"i Le z: ors $ afju Sq �. to —a;sa � °` ^.• to 'a .'6,Y o of z lie �a 6� i N of iu `a` ti Z; �L s � � Y M cu L2 va3. a q�N spa 'tto VV t `o e�g or Z�cn `'d gu�yy@ tivy� S way. +�. a: SUN cw. wY TV 0Y g'N�` O d gyp � N ►. M b. vl; w e 13 ua' �QOQL �`«.� Q �yY•�'. J a� ia•� �FµMMQ MAW yC •rs Ile It imp 6 L.. �[.V,O. V6i.:9 � <�i� "1. �•V �g .e� ��F,A P ��V� p s sGQ. $ « Yy 'as 4.1 ME a , 71 x - -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMUNGA STAFF REPO 7 y! _ DfiTE. October 25. 1989 TO: Chairman and"Members of the Planning Camntssion FROM: Barrye R.,;Hanson. Senior Fivil Engineer. BY: Barbara Kral%-Assistant Civil Engineer 'SUBJECT-. £4VIRONVIENTAL ASSESSMENT AND T£NTAT Vt PARCEL MAP 12829 A.li: Reiter eve oilmen = A su w sl.dn or 5.13 acres. .or an into parce s n e: ndustriat Para DUtrict (subaraa .6� and 0. 'W"een Avenue Overlay District; located at the mr.thear orner of Haven i Aueitue and Trademark Parkvi.. °Worth (APO210-081-� f I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Re uIasted: Approval of ' `1 proposed Tentat,ve`Parcel Flap as s off' B. Parcel Size: Parcel 1 2.97 acres' Oarcei 2 2.76 acres. okal, 5.73 acres C. Existing Industrial Park,-`subarea b of the Industrial Specific Plan and the Haven Avenue Oven.V.'.5istrict D: Surrounding Land User North - vacant South - Vacant _`. East -ant - West - Existing Industrial and Vacant E. Surrounding General Plan and Development Co d Designations., North - Industrial Park and Haven Avenue Overlay District. South - Industrial Prrk and Haven Avenue 0ve4-lay District East - Industrial Park West • Industrial Park ITEM #1 ;vt PLANNING COMISSIGN STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP MO.- H. REITER DE+ OPNENT �OCTOBM,25, 1989 PAGE 2 I F. Site Characteristics; .. There are two existi ndu ng I str�,Jai buildings Lca'tei within.proposed -.a} E` Parcel 2. Proposed Parcel 1 i,.l vacanii at this tiele; II. ANALYSIS:' tle purpose of this parcel "map"i5 to 16vide separate-parcels, fir a previously approved" diaveiopment. The aevtlopment was approved `Ihe." Punning 'Commission on September 11, 1985, 6- 1 the constriction. 'W taree 0) office buildings as Dlt' 85-13.` Two 'of the buildings' have been G constructed and are situ.itid on parcel 2 -:of thetentative map. The building to he located-on Parcel, 1 has°`not yet'been eonstNucte& d time extension fob° the constisaction ;of this building was 'granted on 4 Mmember 10, ;'19.t7, and w0l- expir`e on. ,September 11, 1990. Public.• 'improvements adjacent to this;project,have, bean completed,,: M. ENVIROMMENTk REVIEW,") TM,e applicant completed hart 1 of the ''Initial Sr;u :__Sfa_fr con.. ed a, field investigation and completed Part II of ,.' the Initial S. dy': No adverse impacts upon the environment ai-e anticipated as a result oll, this project. Ther?fpre, issuance.of Negative I'... Declaration is appropriate. W. CORRESPONDENCE:, Notices of Public Hearing have b;:sn sent to surrounding proper,y owners atiid,placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been comleted. V. RECORiM OATION: It is 'recommend€d that the MOning Commission consider" all input anTeTements of the Tentative Parcel Map .12829. If after sack consideration, the .Comission can recommend, approval, then the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuar:Le of'a Negative Decleitian wound be appropriate: _ Respectfully.submitted, Barrye:R. Hanson Senior Civil Engineer t t' RRH:9K:sd Attachments: Vicinity Map (fxhibit. "A"). Tentative asap (Exhibit "B") r Resolution and ; Recommended;conditions of Approval 1 7 did], IMTH 8'r1 10. on= FOUP-TH CrrY OF EL MAC RA CHO CUCAMONGA, : VICINITY- MAP: IMMEPRE ; DWMON BXMMT,. W ' ► I.I,L.�. a J..L�'�I�tt1•i''''"f I''�r i�C I ;yC.1.1 LIL,..;..!�`s _- � �• I'�fTi' ,� ZTl1����.�-rl-Ct�.�i j�;11�1Ti i` -i f� i- � �.,..�. 444 1 11 -i �•�— 49_ 1PARCEL it .. ` 2.97 AC Ul � m � ...: �.• � ill �?w' "� -+ cr uj 0• d OF y MAP ?- RANCHO'I CUC ONGA miANoVE MA. ZNGDMMMG DrVMON RESOLUTION NO, A RESCYTION OF,.THE 'PLANNING, CQMJHTSSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHOa XUCAMONGA; CALIFORNIA, •CONDITIONALLY APROVING: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 12829'- LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND TRADEMARK 'PARKWAY NORTH -- APN 210-081-17, AND` MAXING FINDINGS lci"+SUPPORT THEREOF WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number, 12829,.submitted by A.H, Reiter Development, applik,ant; for tine purpose of;subd,ividing into 2parcelsg the real property, situated in the Ci1ty, of RaM ho Cucamonga, County of` San Bernardino, State of California, identified. as.APN(s) 210-0E1-17 located at the northeast corner of Haven,Avenue and Trademark`Parkway North;. And WHEREAS. on October 25:, ,1989, the Planning,Commission held a dul y .advertised public hearing fe`{the above-descr=ibed map:- FOLLOWS- NOW, THEREFORE, THEr RANCHO CUCfiMONGA PLANNING CDN1hlT�� N; ESDLYED AS SECTION 1: That the 1161lcWing findings nave-beery, made1 1. That the map is. consistent with the Generai4 Plan. `'- 2. That the-improvement of the pr' posed subdivision is 4 eonsisteni with the General Plan. 3. - That the site is physically .suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the prop`a.z.,subdivisios; and improvements will not .cause substantial environmental damagE or public health problems or have, adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: Thus Commission finds'and certifies Iha't the project has wed been revie yard considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 12829 is :tiereby approved subject to the attached Standard Conditions and the following Special Conditions: t 1. An in-lieu fee as co0ribution to the future , 4 undergrounding of the ei'sflng overhead utilities (telecommunications and, electrical, except for 66 . K.V. electrical) on the opposite side of Haven Avenue shall be paid to the C(ty s follows: _F .1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0.' it ?""vTITIVE PARCEL MAP 12829 A.H. REITER MTOBER 25, 1989 PAGE 2 1k tt � a, Farcgl 1'; One-half the City a,dppted unit amount timer;"th��length from the., nor'h parcel boundary to the'south parcel bouoAr- :prior �to-issuance of a building permit. 4, b, Paarcf,1.2i -n:One-ha!f�the tatty !tcnte�} unit`amouns time-"- the length from�tne 'north parcel boundary . to 0e center of Trademark Parkway 'Noy th prior , ttQ-n'nal °pLecei"maP approval 5 1y APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 251A QAY OF OCTOBER 1"*089..; PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO: CUCAMONGA ,1 BY: .Larry T. McNiei, Chairman ATTEi": x' Brad Buller, Secretary^` I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the 'Planning Commtssion;of the City of Rancho,' Cucamonga, do hereby certify that "the,joregoing Resolution was":duly .and regularly introduced, passed, and ,adopted by the Rlanning Commission of, the . City ofRancho Cucamohga;"at A regular meeting of'the ePlanning Commission held on the 8th, day of October,'1989,;by theJollowin vote-to-wi:t. AYiS, COMMISSIONERS:' NOV(;:'': COMMISSIONERS: " c. ABSEh7:' COMISSIONERS: i E r tY 4l uM roOH w. ♦' � N� C '. 1^. V...w NCO :A P L Y ' '•Y� - �� y!'L I ,.• `Q �. W q. �M � x f_ �. /gyp CI Yg'Y Pat. ,y�m �,.p y' N�� �G _ 1 8 a ¢w Y�4€. AYE s$Y 4r f&.°t. ks5 ST'to CY a .2.: S?'1 Xse 0 -a--- �'s p� a�O_ 'pf Q. -75 VI WS p A 5 4{� O y .• 3 , Aw d e � GdGd g 0J gs. b�. •O4 fW 0� w 21Lip Its la Al t 6� » ZZ F. 23 H yshJ $ in YO yew aywi wrwi w r 1 N r �� 1 II q � M ft11 �E•� Ct.� V~ O S y 6 �= qua po,p ,4yy G�O - w Y CY i ^aa 4 V. N 6 y�aqp CCU .pp4., Ly:Y YL60 uC L .. '��•( � py npp y� > np 4V f � o •Y N �� a` � �® a ^o $g$ •( $�� a �S ' M u vh —Y. 9y iW +hH � .(cwQpM Q - CC �• C�p .r _.4a L a Q ai1` YY aCS O�.' •Yn� �N �� C�o q�C��( �GC� CNm qN r�•i� IG NS !AO V O is ML Y`pp ylma® $�l�p s• Yv' CY w. .C.N �'4a.... C gy ■app ®M7� CN� �tly� i¢ 6NO: 41� `.. O� my. `.0 R �aC 0 ►: Yp'Y i �y �1• ate . y u� 2 a Y �46 L w+ a.l d • N A• a: y�. P N cil �e 'I w 4^ CITY OF RANCHO C,TCAMONGA STAFF REPORT' DATE: October 25, 1584 ` TO,,, Chairman and Members'of the Planning Coemission ;. FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner ' BY: Nanty Fong, Senior Planner E: SUBJECT: ENVIROR4ENTAL ASSESSMENT AND, VAR ANCE 89-11' PALOMBO` - A request to a imin-ate tile. require, 2-car garage by converting it inta``a climate controlled bedroom for t medical reasons, fRr a single family '_ftfiidence on 18 acres, of land in, the Low 'Residential district., (2-4 ^ dwelling units per acre),located at.the southwest corner 1 of Zion Street and ;La. Ronda Street - APN 202:323-27. I. PROJECT ANC•`SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Acticn Re nested: Approval ' f the,4lariance to convert the existing -car garage into iLspecial care Living quarterS:- B. Surroundina Land Use and Zonin ; urt Single Family omes: ow Density Residential - District (24 dwelling unit'Oar,acre) South - Single Family Homas: Low Density Residential District (2-4 dwelling unit per acre) East -` Singlp Family,Homes: Low Density Residential District (2-4 dwelling unit per acre) West - Single;flamily }comes Low Density Residential District (2-4 drellit:3 unit per acre) ~ C. General Plan Desf nations: ProJecf,Siteow uas ty Residential North Low Density Residential South - Low Density Residential East , - 'Low Density .Residential West - Low Density Residential, D� Site Characteristics: The site 'is approximately 7,854 squs eat n size. s -a corner lot and contains one sine, family home (see' Exhibit D). - i � r z' TEN I i .1. '. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF ,REPORT ;f VA '89-11 PALOM80 i' October 25-,,1;1989 Page 2 III ANALYSIS- A. General: , The appllcan, ) Tom Palombo is requesting conversion of his .existing 2-car gaga a into a climate controlled bedroom for his use due-to' mt�iG,a1, reasons. Mr= Palombo is a WV espira-tart'. dppe ►ettt=q+iadrlegict�klis livingquarter's mist be designed toE�have 'a controx�d"envi'ronmettt: The existing :. MN garage is small enough to be con erted into a controlled HN environment, yet 'large enough to &cq odate, his living requirgments. f Attached is a 'copy, of.the,,lette-� from Mr. Palortboi explaining his condition and q lettf f _:from Dr. Robert Fabricant confirming trIs, needs, tjThe applicant also ias support from tsar surrounding property-owners, as shown in Exhib'it"A and the attached pe; "lion, B. Elimination of the Required 2-Car Gar-a e: The `conversion of v the 2-car garage wit out constructing another, gage_ necessitates this Variance._ The Development Code requires 2 parking' spaces within a' garage for'. a sir4le family residence. Following is staff`s'analysis of the Variance requests 1. Unique ami *special circumstances The intended' use, converting the,gar e into a special care living quarters, is unique and extraordinary .because of the medical needs of the occupant and does not apply to all properties of the same development district. 2. Unnecessary Physical 14aaWsbip: In looking at the shape and size of the lot and the- bl-ilding. orientation_, staff: determined that- 'there are a1t_;atiYes 'which woe, .not reo" rre. a Variance. One pos,Iisility would Fk to trw+k4 a tteW I'car garage ;within''the. b'at yard since`there as„�an - existing 10 foot wide driveway leading to 1t. Another` possibility is to add'on to the existing garag;;. Hordever, the applicant 'has indicated thatL is not feasible due to financial hardship at this time. J. Strict Interp 'tatioft of the Code Requirements Staff felt" that strict interpretation and enforcement of this code require+mant, may impole ::,an undue, hardshipr upon the applicant and deprive km of adequate special'-�afeliving t quarters, Staff believes that there, is" a reasonableness in the imp;i6mentation of the Development Cud e. �PLAN14ING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ti VA 89-11 - PALOhED- October 25, 1985 Page'3 7 4. Set a Precedent in the '. City?: Staff believe that the granting of the Variance would not set a;precedence in the City because of the uniame circumstances involved, Reasonable conditions c6d'Id'Aze' imposed to guarantee conversion back to a garage of s!i ch time that tine special care addition is no longer necessary for the applicant. 7hus,; the rantin g g; arce could� be considered temporary. o� this Vari 5. W 1,.,There be a Parking Problem A With regards to parting,* the. driveway in frattt, of the1� garage will accommodate,2 open parking 'sp�*s., Furthgr; _there is a paled driveway 10-foot wide that'gc°.:s frofi Ga Ronda Street to the back; yard, approximately fib lineal feet. This Ecould accommoda*.`e approximately open parking spaces. Therefore,, it should not'impact. Oe public.street. Based on the above analysis,, ii4f-f concluded that these are , valid austifications to grant the Variance, subject to -those conditions listed in the attached '�esolution,. C. Environmental Assessment: Staff has completed;;i�art II of the nvironmentalTC'ecklist and determined that th;6re will not be a significant impact as a result of this proposed Valiance. If the Planning Commission concurs With these findings, Sssuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. III. ' FACTS FOR PTNDINGS: In 'order for the Planning Commission to approve ar ance 9-11, faCtS to ,support the following findings Rust be° .qade• - 1. Strict or literal -interpretation and enforcement of the , specified regulation would result in h practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent ' iYfitih'.the obje it yes of. thei:Development. Code; - t 2: There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditiow applicable to the property involved or' to the Intended' use of the property that do not apply to other of erties in the -same development district, in that converting the garage,, into -a special care living quarters is a unique and extraordinary situation. 3. Strict or literal interpretationrand enforcement of,�0ese specified regulations would depriyp the applicant of x.r privileges',enjoyed-;by the owners,of'all the properties in the same. develop Clstrict. Without the Variaoc_e, the applicant,l would be'deprived of decent special care`li'ving quarters:, r - PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ;? VA 8g-•11 -<PALOMBO' Octuder 25,'1989 Page 4. Granting ;of:'the Variances would not,constitute .a grant of special privilege inconsistent'-with the limitations of other, properties classified in` the ' same development district because a time limit on the condition-of-approval has been imposed. The Varie—., is .approved for a special care addition for the applica,rt as long ;as it is necessary to maintVr in his physical health. At any such time that the sp.erAal care addition is not necessary, the Variant.:; shall bo—voided and the special ''care addition converted back to a garage. 5'.• The granting, of Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare of'imaterially injurious to the properties or improvements in)tihe vicinity. IV. CORRESPOND ENCE.7 This 'item has been. adver*,iced in the Daily Re ort newspaper as a public hearing, the property posted a-3n ` notices were .,ant to all property ewners within 00 fnet' of the project site. V. RECOMMENDATION. Staff recommends the Planning Cowission.'conducc a public hearTng ;=ecelve input regarding this Variance. If the Planning Comnissiom concurs with staff findings, Variance 89-11 would then be approved through the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuafice of a Negative Declaration. , Res fly s tted Bra e City anne ; BB:NF:sp Attachments' Letter o` Request from the-App'icant. Letter frail Nnysician Petition from Adjoining Residdents Exhibit "A" Location Map 1 Exhibit "B" Site Flan l Exhibit "C" - Floor Plan Resolution of Approval with Conditions n ' ` *1� n Jt18T FICATION 6ti VARXANCN i� t�f Thomas pa2ornbo is a respbratory dependant quadrapledgic. Toms medical condition is such tba°:.. his body teviperature is sol�.'\depehdant upon the to ai the environment. { This motzif3cation is requested to prevent a potentia 11 lift- threatening situatioa, 'While not creating; a finunoial hard- ! �•. ship. fibs modification"( see attached drawing } Will, be.oan$� trusted to alloarreasy access fox his �vheelo pit through ' an extra wide door. The room, 13 ft. by 13 fit is small` enough tb contr64 both heating and ai,v condxtintxing, yet large enough to acaomadate kzis equipment and living, requirements when needed. The t;lectrical requirement, respirator, light .ng,,tEmperature, and medical_ needs'kll be supplied;by a an existing portable generator, 1fi Frequent power outages, during the &anta Ana tYinca, and the Keating, ventilating and air condl,,tioning equipment failures have pjoe ;ented in the past, :life threateni g situations. One sx\�ph situation was rectified by takjlrP Tom to the utontcla ,x- -plaza for approximately G f`zour4 } The modification ,,quires no structural ehauges._fo the exterior of the hdxxt �t►d there are;five open parking Ask spaces available on s�v�. � see attached -'drawing ) The construction of a special room or another enclosed parking area would be an extreme financial hardship. I ; V id , = PAItIFIC EYE INSTITUTE ,, 633 Nonh Thirteenth Avenue Rmuff rr fAeRiQ1+R.iKo,ow,CS. ':.I Upland,Cal.fomii 91786 ;µN Dtm4M i Via)98248846 DONAIb E,lYNtTR,M.R. 800.30.8979 R S,R:POiV0.lAl4`L RRt7CEG,�tivA �0.0. 110>7 vark Am.suite 130 R�CNA0.D NTNRU•Q,D,MAx. _ AtCr1ARG 4.S4uPSON.OD. V( c;1y111e,Califomli 92302 DONALD 1(.SPAVLD1Nty:),D r619)241.6366 August 15,_1989 City .41� Rancho Cucamonga P l.aniiing Commiss_ton 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Thomas Palomba To.Whom It May Conceriit; I have reviewed and dis�,,ussed. the proposed modifications o;i�the garage area for Thomas P`iombo at 9211 La.Ronda. The critical requirement � J f cosiZro�linyTom`s body temper is Fharscteristic with quadrapleg J* To compno_:nd the situation, Tom is also dependent upotl'a respirator for his breathing. The modification, in my, opinion, is the bfi �',,,giib`te medically economic solution to avoid the potential threatening situations that could arise from either elects?—y ;power f,7i11wtes: or air conditioning/Halting equipment faiturbs. ', 9Rnbert N. F:_bricant, N.D... ; F.A.C.:S. RNF;vm " Vol /1 � �_. •C �'I.3�'stj J. � t To: City of. Rancho Cucam(1_iga Planning C,.)mmssion I am aware of 'ahe proposed modification UP the enclosed parking area at 9,-.ki La Ronda, Rancho Cucamonga. I am also aware that the modification i13 for the med.cal well-;bung of Tom Palombo Vao resides at 52i1 La Ronda._I am aware that the modification_ consists rf adding an air conditioned room and storage --ea within the enclosed parking area. I do not obj_act to .tr S modifioatiQ;t nor.do I oppose the issuing of a variance to perform the wo)'k required. Date Name rrrt/,ram y Nanr Address GS/ •� i;� 1.1 r - City r Signature t � - SignatureLacy leoppeler IJ lh Y 4 X C9A! '21HM Mo9s11 lmo 1 �z 4D ti •r Ora y3a 'OrSl rLa 9r+a'. fiti 1�f nk`1-•1^�j ' N I ' 4 40 4.tfatif' t e {1e.+ fib."> �s e�isa© tae' =sr�' ass fss Asa' �`'°4 i"••;I, +.�' s m y ��� �}+i"� .R�a '�: n�f®• J O t� �i �» Sea P,. afs �c:� �;�- 1°p •sp. aaQe t; ,. . as .•i. R' 0:.0 y w' =-s' 1rG0 tirlv+awi rri 9.O 17 9171 �s rt'• arY ers�. Vet "Yt7% � + � fra AMD a NT Is y Ir aw f 4 rff tr�4 frPf`1rK as •g:.. 7 le �4. 9sa irr;7 a7 •at7� + �fiS' , • • M hi y! !!C "yi® is 17 a {It'^I .H� 1 l'�1' v `�,�sa°y'•Pl � a.�P? s�} ci®*I® Loi+� �:J S_�_ 1" tb • a w� l' +O iC 6 T �1L l1 . t 2T-•�. f M7 a O Q i oo - ! wroo, �+ I�bL: � f ` .•rr Jr it 1Vj Awn 01 M ' tea: TON . fSJ - ti t _ PAVED a K LJ cn 2e. �{d GRASS 1~� I;Wf+y.HSS �h BRAG - ILIi xisT Zj, :aaoD . i ION � f 5. f, 03 a� J/ e � 0 II ------------ it 'ON �q ¢ EGUBM SCAM ill �r RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION 0 THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING VARIANCE No. 89-1;1 ,TO EL3MINATE THE REQUIRED' 2-CAR GARAGE 8Y CONVERTING IT TO A: SPECIAL CARE LIVING QUARTERS. LCCATED. AT "3HE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LION AND LA RONDA STREETS 111 THE LOW.DENSITY.RESIDE�TIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS`IN SUPPORT"THEREOF - A�JN9 '202423-:73 f A. Recitals. �{ 0) Tom Palombo 'has filed an application for the issuance of the Variance No. 89-11 as described in the title of UN Resolution. Hereinafter in this 'Resolution, the subject Variance requestj�is referred to as "the application". 00 On October 25, 1_98% the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a du'iy noticed ,public. hearing on the application and concluded safe hearing on that date. (iii) All legal peerequisites to the adcpticr of.this Resolution have occurr,e.d, B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and eesoived by' the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the farts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of t':is Resoju`ion are,true and correct. 2. Based upan substantial evidence presented'to this Commi,pion dv,~ing the ibove-referenced public hearing on,October 25, 1989ii including ;itten and oral. staff reports, together with public testimoi;y, 1,his Commission hereby f specifically finds as fellows: (a) The application applies to 'property located At 9211 La Ronda with a street frontage of i'9 feet and lot depth of IO2 feet'and is Fr^sentiv improved with a single family.home; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is single family homes, the property to the south is si�lgle family homes, the property to the east is single family homes, and the praperty to the west is single family homes; and (c) The applicant is a respiratory deprndent quadripiegis. and requires special' care living quarters (climate rontrglied, bedroom) for maintaining physical health; and (A) The lot fas improved driveways that could accommodate r approximately 5 open parking spaces on-site; and f 'i PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT'& VARIANCE 89711 - PALOMBO October 25,'2985 Page;2 (e) The conver•5ion is temporary a. „ng as the applicant requires -.,.a tho special care living quarters, and th`? space can.+be converted back tolLa garage at any time. 3. Based upon 0e1 substantial evidence_presented, td:,:this:Xommissien during the above-referenc,�A public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 a4ave, -Is Coii ission herehy�.f7ads and concludes as follows: (a) That strict or literal `,interpretation and enfarcemnt of,.the specified regulations would result in practical diffitculty or,unnec:essary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of-the Dejelopmznt,Code; (b) that there, are exceptional or extraordi,-,ary c kumxtances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use .af the property that do not apply generally to other"Pro pert iF';".in the same' district; (c) That .strict or literal interpretation°'and enforcement,' of the specified regulation would,_deprive the applicant of pr4,vil.eges7-enjoyed by the f owners of other properties i,n the same district; � (d) That the granfIrg, of thr, Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations ot, other properties , classified in 00 same district; (el That the granting of the Variance will not` be det►yimertal to the. public ht-alta, safety, or welfare, or materially-injurious toy roperties or improvements in the vicinity. "' ` a Piis Commission hereby finds and certifies than the prc'ject has been reviewed and considered fn'compliance with the California Envi+'onmental Quality Act;of 1970 and,° ,further;-this Commission hereby, issue; aj�Negative Declaration. 1 b, Based upon the findings and conclusions set fortki in parz,grap�s,s 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each aad every condition set forth below,,- (a) The'approl.al 1of Variance 89-11 shall run with the applicant as long as the special care 13ving IttArters is necessary to main4ain the ,= applicant's physical health. (b) At any such time'when the special care living.gOartiars are not necessary, this Variance shall become void and the special care addition shall be converted back to a 2-car garage. The applicant shall record an agreement in a form satisfacto.y to the City Attorney and Cit,,•; Planner, prior to issuance of any permits for the i'nsnrior improvements.' 6. The Secretary to this Coi�isslon stall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. � 2W 1 PLANNINC'--COMMISSION kESOL07ION NO. - ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT'&. MIANCE 89-11 - FALOMBO October 25,11989' Page 3 APPOVED AND 'ADOPTED THIS 257H 0AY'OF OCTOBER, 1989, PLANNING COMMISSION OF TiIE 6ITY'd0 RANCHO� ONGA Larry T 'McNiel, Chairman" �4 ATTEST: Brad 8e1]e'l^ Secr�e•Ssary 4 I. Brad Bu11er,. Shereby ,ecretary- of'the Planning 'Commiss5an. of the rity t�f Rancho Cucamonga, do certifA' tb�t the foregoing Resolution way" IduT artd- regularly introd,�ced, pas°sed, nd aduptea by the Planning, C-�^�5>io[1 a "the City of Rancho, ,Cuha,,nohga at a rzgulap maeting or`th" Manning commis"s-inn held on the 25th day.of October, 19859i by`thy fa1-lowting vote=to-Wit:: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONER _• ; ABSENT: COMMISSIONERSr a* E e• 5f,! 4 a FuaUrARun,1889 sC�/k1/621nr!/ {J t YYltYk4{n!�l 7hrrltoryEatabtiehed.1880 Cherokee StripRun,1893 -zY�ce;.i� ; �:ter.~�i,•L, • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAP 1110NCt, r DATE: October 25> 1989 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Como ssion FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner 111 BY: Steve Hayes, Assistant Ptannet SUBJECT: iNGIRO'M9ENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84-17 NL W 11 request to establish � church in a►) exist ng btr:t ��g totaling 16,457 square feet,, on 2.42�; acres of land in the tedium Residential 0ist;rict (8�14"dwel.liragv units per, acre)y located., at the northwest corner of 19th et and Amethyst Avenue - APN*. 201474-02 k,Ad 03. I. PROJECT AND ,SITE OESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a Conditional Use Permit to estab is-1 h a church in an existing building and issuance ,df a Negative Declaration. B. Surroundinq Land`Use and Toni North Senior Citizen apartments;..High Density Residential (24-33 dweiii;ng units per acre). Also, this area ties within a Senior Housing Overlay District. s Seth Single family residence; to Densi:?y Residential (2-4 dwelling,units per Last Post Office, Fire Station and offices; Office "Prnfessinnal and tedium Density Residential (8-14 dwell i:ng gnats per acre) kto` - Sin`Qle family residence; helium Density Residential - (.a;�14 pwellinS Units per, acre; C. :9nerai 'Pi,in Deny nations, ro ac` � t#e` X-Mu- um Residential (8-1.4 d* Cling units Per acre) f North - ` Nigh oPasity Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre) �., ' South . Low Density_Residential (2-4 dwelling units per; acre East Office and G1vidAoa nity k. st - Medium Density Residential (8-14 +dwelling units per a �) t `:� ITEM a •s-PLANNING CCMMiISSIQN`STFFF`'jtEPORT ' CUP B9=17 INLAND,-AREA FELLU IP October 25, 1989 Page 2 D. Site Characteristics The site contains the historic /J1ta Loma School b! uiding built in 1921, asphalt areas, and many, mature pine and palm trees. The site slopes getitly to the south at roughly percent. E. Parking Calculations: Numb Pi f Numbest f Type Square' ' Parking Space Spac(, of Use Footage Ratio Requii Proyided f� Church Sanctr,ary 2,1001 1/35 SO ;i72 P. Applicable ue ula�tions� The Medium Density" Residential deve- lopment district Mows churches subject toliapprovaT of a Conditional Use-4-,rmit'by the Planning. Commission. II. ANALYSIS*, r A. General: Inland Area, Felicwship is oroposinq to iv•w an existirx3 building, .the o?d Alta ,Loma School as their church facility.' Most recently, the ,building''was, the Alta Loma Manor. This buildit'J was designated a point of Historic Interest by the Citj.SCouncil on Dece*er 21, 1968, after recommendation of the 'historic Preservation Commission. _ It was the 'Council's desire to have the building be restored to +; its original condition as msch as possible, and be designatedF as an historic ,landmark in the future.. The attached stafr report to the Historic Preservation Commission dated November 3, 1988 highlights the'history of the:scho0 u1I5',�ding. B. Land Use Compatibility: The primary issue zssociated withr this' proposal 'is the compatibility with exis''iing residential development adjacent to the site. The church—is—proposing to locate on a property that abuts residential development to the north and rest. As a result, potential conrlicLs .between institutional and residential,land uses are possible,, such as, additional noise and treffic, and loss of privacy. To buffer the church from surrounding residences, °a solid wall' is ^ recommended along the west property line. 'Currently, a block wall exists between the,._proposed church site and the senior- housing project.to the north. Only a chain link fence exists i along a., majority of the^ west property line. Staff 'has receiver; preliminary interest in a .townhouse development to the west of the church'site.. - '1 as PL4i NING;COMMISSION STAF'r` REPORT ,. CUP 89 17 -'i�rLAir9 AREA FEZLOWSHIP October Via;, 1989 Page 3, C. Phasing of ovements: In conj Im runct'an with the request to oD -- use the building as,, a church, other improvements area recommgnded by,staff. The church isrropos%ng aq `phase these improvements (see Exhibit "G"); D. Design Review Committee Toe Design'Revies_r Committee (Mctiiei, Weinberger;, Kroutil) rc^cnmended approval at its October 5111989 meeting subject to the following cond"`,igri ; 1, The butld; `,co brs shai-;d be revised to incorporate a more subtle "cream" coior scheme. (A revised color board will submitted for review and approval of the Design Review Commi.aee,prior to this Planning Comnissicn meeting date). 2. The existing" pine tree within the row of palm trees along the north ide uf; the north drive should be relocated within the } planter `near northwest corner of the building... 3. A block wall 6hoii_ld be cz`Ostruct da,along the west,;proµperty line from the future access point for tc: the west to the existiriq wall,. The new_i,r, . of the wall should be of a material consistent W1tt-_,,,,,2`existing 'wall along the north and htst property lines., Said 2wall should be in place within -rne '(1);_ ye-ir of the Planning Commission:'s approval date of the project. 7,Tle Commmittee"' suggested that the applicant work cooperatively with the property owner to the west to have'"the wall constructed- within the required tine frame. - 4. Interlocking pavers should be inC ided at bath vehicular entrances and in a pedestrian crossing near the main entrance to the building. , S. Additional streetscape plAting along, Amethyst Avenue, north of the required access point,.,,,shTld be included in Phts`_ 2 of the church's phasing program: ; 6. ` The prtYr,,ed landscaping along the Est., proerty line should ,e m placJi within one.,(11 year of the Planning Conmisaion's' approval date for this project. Other areas of parking lot landscaping not already, included in Phase 1 should be inr,l rporated intq N)ase.l. ' E. Technical Review Committee: O,r October 3_, 1989, the Committee rev ewed the project and determined that, with the;recommended standard conditions of-;approv.4; the project is cohslAent jqL a PLANNING COh;(+iISSIC-N STAFF.:2E!'t1RT CUP 89-17 - INLAND AREA FELLWHIP October 25, 1989 Page 4 �. with ail applicable standards and .ordinarr`es. The Grading' Committee conceptually approved the projr-"t at its reeting on October 2, 1989. . F. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed,by the applicant. -Staff,has completed Part II oY the Environmental Checklist and determined that project could-have significant adverse environmental impact's in tree' removals as a result of this project. Pa arborist report w?,s prepared •,for the site to 'address the ;health of all m8'ture heritage trees on-site. The arborist's findings indicated that a majority of the trees were healthy. The landscape plan' reflects that all health, mature trees on-site will - e. preserved. Therefore, mitigation through preservation, tss been included in the project's design.> If,,, the Commission' concurs with staf f's findings, then issuance of a llegat•lve Declara,j.ion would be in order. IIJ. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: 1. The proposed use is in accord with the General ,plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located 2. The proposed use, together with the, conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development_Code. IV; CORRESPONDENCE: This ittm has,been advertised as a 'public hearing in The a�ilx port newspaper, the property, posted, and notices mai led to al I property y4ners within 300 feet of the project. V. RECOMMENDATION: If the Planning Commission concurs with the proposed pha� ng program, staff recommends the Planning Commission approve pp Conditional Use Permit 89-17 through ,adoption of the.attached Resolution and issuance of a;Negative Daclaration. R' tfu l bmi Br, le City, lannt 88.SH:mlg PLAN ISS., STAFF REPORT CU AREA FELLOWSHIP ' October 25, 1489 Page 5 Attachments:. Exhibit 'IN' r Site Utilization Maps Exhibit "B" - Site 'Plan Exhibit IVI Conceptual Landscape flan Exhibit "O", - Conceptual'Gradrng Plan Exhibit ""� -,Building Elevations Exhibit "r-' - Floor Plan Exhibit V' -Traposed Phasing Program X' history'Freservatar Compission St af't Report.dated N6t er 3, 148$ -' Resolution of Approval i • . 1 t , tf, ti sr I t �MMW�T bMINt.w ` NMrI I M!W � fn!ih}T� „I Ittwr Mrw.wN � ' x Q� IA LAI ' tirs.o. 'LI I Y ` Y,LYE L. 70NO VMVD[NMi, CIO i ZOM COK^-*CL4L. CFi ' OP t 0 Ct C�?vi€�NG : �u g PLt N G•OlV[SION' 3 F ; I � � ,{ l o � ,0'° #� H F � i rr ,I �e co""" csar Sans MN r t { R Ga,�..,t use os.fta 0.2%) s j CiiaEh Mr. re aayi�ttld/�(PatC3 tb'tlom7att Itt's tat• a �• 9 Te 'r�eryasrRt«► a'QAm r,� A w met r< i< a r I �t g. g _ J cI I;t Q '; I2$s �`r"COCAM13NGA rrEm.--G ? f-7 I)I?Vg lom X1FIID `Q" Scat.,Z I j;, .; � �. .: ? rsr., '� � �- w _. O r r+�t�1 ..., a�, � l— �.-. s• "'�Q, O � � PJ - �. `' � n y: ` `{, ��.,-., �-,'- ,: .....� ��� ..,..� f 40� Ming �„ �.' r•+—r. JIV VI CITY OF.1�, t Ord QCAMONGA TI m.��p 2-9--n ! PLA3MlalG'I31'�r<SICiN` EXHIOrr. "Q" SCALE:-� � •l rl f :Nam ;. CITY CAM®NGA Mt: PL,1�ItT1!JC 'G`�3IV SI41'J TMF: cicva EXHIBM"B-I SCALE: F�"-� t:`' ••:.•X= 4 .4r 1 {�.,_ r X� §., �.. �a: M ti !1 ! ''�t ��; �"�*4 Q iP Fi,:l �� f�� R is X ' '� � J ._�r�V® ��j. J 6� ' A ry �, __ .r. _. _ f ��14 T � �w f �� • y� � tlRr w r -,ter+..n.c7• Yf � — — �. ,�- iL � ,.d ' ,f � _ Il {� r, .. �, it � � f� ® Y.�, � L . — —� �'1�LY t. 7.�. ;µ'.A'•: '� .. �'� �� ti� —_ � -'ems-� -- � �' 9.,_ �. 7J r Y y �.1 _ � �' fit. �"�^�� pry, ( `i'i :tie_'�G.rRT r` ,��' .�/ � �y l �� ti �M1,: .J w° O: ""�^. i i � �� t, :2j r.i.... n:, a :. . s� c ' v =„' Mi�1 1 eaeren we..ae mss,., � ermas wean-� Caw f UPM LEM LOWCM LWM I P+t Cl�ClUCAMONGA ITEM (.r VP apt-1? PLA N G"DIVISION SCALE: I XHIEIT:'F" GT f� EXHIBIT "S" r PROPOSED PHASING PROGRAM P P Rgosed HASE ITime ' lime Taa 1. Exterior. painting Prior to occupancy 2. Interior remodeling Prior to occupancy, S. 19th Streetscape planting Prior to occupancy, 4. Amethyst streetscape planting Prior to occupancy (south of driveway) 5. Groundcover north of Amethyst driveway Prior.to occupancy, 6. Remove dead trees Prior to occupancy, 7. On-site paving, curbing, striping Prior to occupancy 8. Parking lot landscaping (except for Prior to occupancy -west property line) 9. Relocate Pinus radiata tree Prior to occupancy 10. Landscape future pad area with Prior to occupancy, drought tolerant groundcover and temporary irrigation' 11. Remove utility Tines/poles Prior to occupancy 12. Street improvements Prior to occupancy PHASE II 1. Build play area Within 1 yeaav of CUP approval 2. Install balance of landscaping Within 1 year of CUP approval 3. Remove rock terrace and repair Withfr, 1 year of CUP entry steps to original design approval 4� Plant trees along Amethyst Avenue Within 1 year of CUP (north ofdriveway) approval 5. Landscape planter on west p.l. Within 1 year of CUP approval 6. Block wall along west p.l., Within i year of CEP approval 7. Preschool (separate application) Within 1 year of' CUP approval NORTH iIHO Y yy CUBNGA S: _ PHASE III 1. Refurbish building to original Within 4 years of CUP architectural treatment approval ' PHASE IV I. Multi-purpose/gym (separate application) Within 5 years of CUP approval 2. Future parking for gym Within 5 years of CUP approval 3. Underground utilities Within 5 years of CUP approval NORTH TY OF ITEM: RAiNCnO','CUCAM0NGA 11TLZ� ,LANNING DIVISION SCAT. c c , CITY OF RANCH®CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE:, November 3, 1988 TO: Chairman and' Members of the Historic Preservation Commission FROM Larry';Henderson, Senior Planner BY: Arlene Ranks, Associate Planner SUBJECT: A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE SITE OF THE ALTA LOMA SCHOOL OF _ - I. ACTION REQUESTED: This is a proposal to designate the site of the Alta Loma School as a point of historic interest. II. 'BACKGROUND: ti A. Current: "this item has come .to our attention because of .a nu— r 6f recent inquiries regarding he site which is now in escrow. Forithe past several years it has been used As a home for senior:ditizens. The City's Community Services De;�artment has expressed interest in the building as a site f r a community services center. he Commtsston;, in February .of 1987, discussed making the site a point of historric interest. B. Status: The building was not on the List of surveyed properties, presumably bdcause in an informal discussion at th; Historic Preservation Commission meeting of rebrua-y 5, 1987, the Commission acknowledged that the building had been altered too much ° to make it a candidate for designation as a landmark. The survey of 'historic properties was being conducted at the time that the discussion took place. III. SITE LOCATION AND. DESCRIPTION: A. Location: The Alta Loma School is located on the northwest corner, of Amethyst Avenue and 19th ''Street in the Aita 'Loma community. B. Site Land Use, Zoning, and General Plan Designation: The site a�cently been use as a ome tor sen or`ci Tzens called Alta Loma Manor, but is now empty. . Zoning and General Plan „= designation is Medium Density Residential, (8-14 dwelling units• per acre).: HL�TORIC PRESERVATION C� 0(..40N STAFF REPORT R AL'-fA LOMA SCHOO?_ . Novemh lr 3, 1988 Page 2` gift G. Surrounding Land.Uses, Zoninaland General Plan Dssignations': North: - This site is being USedr for a Senior citizen"" housing cusplex., Zoninn and General Plan Designation 'is Hi h Rensity._Residential, (24-30 dwelling units ,per acre), which is overlaid with a SHOD:, Senior Housing Overlay District, SHOD's allow reduced ..parking, density bonuses, anC fee reductions in exchange>'for 1-ong- term„ high quality, , affordable housing for senior citizens. South: - Larin use is single family, residential across highly traveled 15th,' Street; Zoning and General Plan Designation is tors Density Residential, (2,-4 dwelling units per acre). E, ;t: - Land use across Amethyst is office on,the corner and the post office to the north; zoning ' is,, Offide/Professional ands General Plan Designation is Office, West: - Land use is Single Family Residential, 'Zoning and General Plan Designation,: is Medium Oensii,y Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre); D. Description: The Alta Lama School building is on a 1.79 'acre To j Witff feet'of frontage 'along 19th Street and 396 feet along Amethyst. ::An adjacent 75-foot-wide lot is under the same ownership. ; The Lailding is .a urge rectangular structure with its main floor a half 'story,aLave the ground. Its front stairway has beea enclosed and cove,*ed with: decorative rock to make a patio outs�;de the main entry �ch is characterized by the original porch. It appears that-the windows were altered many years aeo, some eliminated,. some miAe larger. ' The siding was-stuccoed and vertical strips of do;orative wood have been. added to the corners and on the wails midway between the corners. A small patch of lawn and trrees lies in front (south side) of the building. To the east, west, and south is an asphalt parking tot; to the north and 'to the west oT the parking area are the remains of play courts. A.free standing carport-like structure stands next to the southeast portion of the building. IV. ANALYSIS: A. Recent Discussions: When members of the Historic Preservation omm ss on discusied this building in February, 1987, they expressed the opinion that the building has been changed too HISTORIC PCtBSERyATI,4N &.,.�#�� ,SION;STAFF REPORY'; ALTA LOMA SCHOOL November 3, 1988 Page°3 r: ¢ much for landmark designation but they thought the site 'was nonetheless ,an important. one: They were conzerned about the design of'proposed new changes and thought that it would be a good thing if the,,building could continue as housing for senior citizens. They wanted toparticipate in design decisions for the building. B. Historic Background: According to The History of Alta Loma, a sc Toodistrictroias formed in Sep em er o _ an n 86 bonds were approved (after an unsuccessful attempt in 1885) to build the Vermosa School at the northwest corner of 19th Street (called Olive) and Amethyst. The school house had a library separating its two rooms-, and each student was al oted a small piece of."round for gardening, part of the curriculum at>.that time. In 1915 a small classroom building was added to the site, and in 1917 the school was wired for electricity. In..s1910 bonds were again passed to build a new school to accommodate the growing population; the old buildings were moved back on the lot and used while the new one was 'under construction. The fate of the old main building is unknown, but the smaller building was moved to Monte vista Street and'served-as the home of the school's. 3anitor, Paul Helmer, who was especially known for the model ships he built. The new building was completed and occupied in 1921. The Alta Loma School contained four .classrooms, and art-� auditorium on the main floor and a basement which had-," classrooms and a-room that later housed a cafeteria. The Boy Scouts, an important and active group; used `the basement for their meetings; the building was used for many community activities- and gatherings such as PTA dinners, Niay Day festivities, and Christmas programs, C. Significance: The building is no longer architecturally sTgnTffcanTlecause it has been changed a great deal.. Its 'main entry porch had,/';een marked .not only by the still existing flattened arched' rpenirgs, -but also a prominent, curved, Mission style roof parapet. TiSe simple ceotangular building was;made of concrete, and had bands of wtadowiln the front. The most obvious. changes have been the flattentiaa and squaring of the Mission parapet, the addition of decorative rock siding to the building, and the rock-covered wall, that encloses the original front stairway that had created a grand entrance fo, the building. Also, generous greenspace made way,for asphdit parking,:areas. h Rq HISTORIC PRESERVAT;ON -,, , ION STAFF REPORT r ALTA LOMA SCHOOL November 3, 1988 .Page 4 The building is historically significant because it housed the. Alta Loma School which was of major importance to ther early Alta Loma' communit; , and the site is significant=-because :J this building and because of the Hermosa School that.t was built Viere store than 100 years ago. The Rita Loma Siftol was important to virtually -everyone who had children or Who participated in annual events. It was paid for and used by the families of ranchers and merchants who created Ki osa, Yamosa,_and finally Nita Lon►a, The school was at the heart of community life for many years. D. issues: S.Ace the corner is zoned for Medium Density 0-0dential use there is a good possibility that the building will be demolished and replaced, with " apartments or condominiums. The Commission maywant to comment on what they would like to see on thW,.-corner, whether it be. the existing building, a next buiidin;, that would fill tbe�`rorner in a similar way, and/or a commemorative plaque placed on a monument, garden'-area, shaded bench, recreation building, or children's_ play area, for example, that would be accessible to pedestrians and bicyclists. If the Commission would like to comment on plans before they go to the Planning ,r:�yaisslon, they should direct staff to communicate their concerns to the Planning Commission. The Commission may also wish to comment on whether, from a historic preservation perspective, the building should be used as a Community Center. The Commission may also want to mWe suggestions regarding rehabilitation. E. Environmental Assessment: Point of interest designation is exempt from r..., un e:�'Yrticle 19, Section 15308, V. FACTS FOR FIND1 pS: The Alta Lora School meets the following criteria in section 2.24.090: A. Histortcal and Cultural Significance: 1. The proposed point: of historic Interest is particularly representative of an historical period. 2, ":he site is the location of an important historical ` building. 9. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting; The proposed point of historic interest in Its location represents an established and �+ ;4y r 7� HISTORIC PRESERVATION cm,,,am STAF REPORT r r w ALTA LOMA SCHOOL ..t November 3, 1988 Page ,v familiar vsual:ff �of the community', , Vt. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was adverti{v"�",tin The Daily Report, and a notice and staff report sent to 'the,1,.,�wner. " , as also discussed the item with� propsective buyer and with a realtor, from ' Century '. vII, REC(hMENDATION, Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation Conn ssion recommend to the City council designation of the site of Th* Alta Low School as a point of his interest becal4se it meets several criteria in the ordinance and is the site "of 4n important public building. Staff further recommends that. the Commission discus; the alternatives presented in Section IV and communicate to the Planning Commission its reeomAndatian for uses for the site and ways to coi memmrate the school. Respectfully submitted, L<J. Henderson Senior Planner LJN.4B;mlg _ ; Attachements "A" - Site location lap "8" Photogt7$S ++C" _ Excerpt from History of Alta Loma .1880-1980 "D" - Historic pain a nteres p . ca on f { r SrN;OR APARTMENT$ I FIRE STATION ALTA LOVA MANOR EPOSTOFFICE 948i 19TH STREET SINGLE FAMIL RESIDENCE1 STRIP COAL MERCIALIOFFICE i i 13TH STMT SlUGLE PAWY R€SitMENCE H CITY 1 F rrEmi TnU-. ALTA LOMA SC�f afll� HISTORIC PRESERVATION exHl _SCALE.—H-O—NE COMMISSION .. ��u ti st` CHAPTER III ` a: u A15 TIMOUGH THE TWENTIES OUTSIDE THE TO'WNSI'TE ; Because of the increase of population in Alta Loma, the 1886 school was becoming overcrowded; by 1915 a small building was built to the west of the,main building to house another classroom,and in 1917 electricity was installed in the schoolhouse.Finally,`in 1919,bonds were passed io build a new school building.The old building was moved back and placed on stilts so.it could be used while the new school was being built;the school that,was finally finished and occupied in 1921 was the concrete building on the northwest corner of l9th,Street and Aine-thyst now used as a rest home.It contained four clas iooxns ar"d an auditorium upstairs,and a urge basement which was used partly for classrooms and later a section of it was:made into --cafeteria.The basement was also used by the Boy Scouts; there was a large troop in the late twenties and early thirties,with Arthur Bridge, who.was president of the School Board,as Scoutmaster and Ralph Mitchell assistant Scoutmaster.'Tue scouts enjoyed having the school baseriient for theirmeeting place; they also enjoyed swimming parties at the Hamilton reservoir and tr n� to Big Bear'where they stayed in Jack McCarter's, the ficckley's,or Doc Pyle's cabin.The scouts made good use of the school basement;making some of the cmatl rooms into patrol looms and using the large area in the center,for games end scout work.'The n0v school became quite a gathering place for the whole community or, many occasions:there were P.T.A.dinners and programs; the May Day festivities and picnics were always fu,x when the children round streamers and danced around the May Pot _ with .games and races afterware r ' and the Christmas program a* `' • .rat _ the school each year was a special occasion.That school was important to Alta Loma. U About the time the . new school was being built,a �. small lunchroom was opened kin the northeast corner of 19th and Amethyst, across from the school,, and run by 'rY r Joe Cannon. On this same turner was r: 'service station and garage owned and operated by Eugene Roberts and George Wilmuth;gasoline at at that time was still 2Y a_gallon, by when 1, S. Hill took over that service The"now"Alta Lama School,4521,now the Alta totes Manor. studon in the Vs, it was down to I&a gallon duce to the depression.When the new school was finished,the old buildings were moved away no one knows what happened to the main building,but the small one'rootn building that had been used as an annex was moved down,to Monte Vista Street and is still there.This i?arf it the old school was the home of Paut Helmer and his wife and family for years.Paul lielmer-was janitor o the school before this time and remain so until the late 4Vs,often helped by his wife Sophia.Sophia Helmer also worked for several`fatnilissl in Alta toma•Paul had a hobby of b.,'Ang model ships;ni models were admired and he and Sophia were respected"in the community!or their hard work ant their friendliness. Its r� .107 r .s: s - d `� Nt.g „+ 1 I �'• mow, F Alta Loma Boy Scout Troop in the late 20's.From_aft to right:?,Oliver Habege arvin Voth,Richar,l Secktey, Cyril Monkman, Ralph Mitchell — Assistant scoutmaster, with Forrest Eck,, yde seated in front of him, Eugene Billings, Leonard Sumr arfieid,Irving Peters, Donald Axt,Charles Engle,Harold Engle,Olin Habegger and Art Bridge seated in front,Vernon Axt,Marvin Wangler,Arthur Bridge Scoutmaster. Ether Blasingame started teaching school in Alta Loma in 1926, she was a young widow with a son, and she had come from the San Fen;ando Valley to look for a job. She remembers that Ju Belden and "Doc"Pyle were two members of the School Board that gave her the job;site tat-ht and second grades, ano the other members of the faculty at that time were Marion Belden, Principal, Marjorie McIntosh,anr' Ullian Widmer. Ethel was pleased with Alta.Loma and soon persuaded her parents,the Terrys,to to'- with her and her son Jack;they lived on Monte Vista.Street at that time. (See Appendix N i Blasingame taught at the Alta Loma School for thirty years, then she taught at Cucamonga Ct, ' ,or ten years, and after retiring she substituted for another ten years,so she taught school for fifty years. She still dives in,Alta Loma, in her home on Lomita Drive; she re 3 r members many of her former pupils and is always pleased to see B' �f any of them again. i" Citrus was the chief industry of Alta Loma from the beginning. However, sonic pioneers had Planted vintvards, had been -picking the grapes themselves and hauling them to I -- wineries in 'Cucamonga; most of the grapes. were wine grapes; although there we , some very good sultanas and muscats rai..ed w too, and those could be sc o grocery stores. In the very ly days, there had been a small An Alta Loma Boy Scout 000th at a Sceutorarca. In picture, left to winery on the L Bar S Ranch in right,(Donald Axt,Rex Thomas,Art Bridge. c�a Alta Loma, alcc t a mile cast of �c `r C3tY at- Rabcho Cucamoag� 'ipplicas�on to NT9:TOATC LANVUARrC.D%j GNAT]U:I 4EISTOATC PD22rT OF rTNiERESY DESSGNATION - / -^ Histd'�ia�,Landmark � / _:-. � }+34tpr3C- pO�,aC 'pi Interest � a 7b$NTFe#CA'#'ION �• 1, Comcn;a Z�smsx �:,j t��4' #�.t7Ma, �'y�A�l►'16f"' i 2. lilsYar�a:,Name, _A' arrsz ��6�act� 3, Stres x Retral Addro3s:94,E:-&* 15. ra.s�s parcel No. :2f3 Ler;al Dssnsipxt'oas C• t7tn'DtE' �''r{a, �, ''t :a 4, ''-es® t eraser•, tr &ncmns ��I C3tr.- L' rT Z ff�7 P¢b iC �f 5. Freaetst tisb: � ._.��- S1 4riNani►1 Vasa. <SG�iae� Other psat .uass �1h a `Cf Q>syt' DF3CAIPTI0 5. 8r'0111 describe the, Present phseica�Y ap�narantm.n1'�the s3ta ar strut turn and dnsarThe app matagr a terl --stioao" Z`ors ,Ctq Crigjaa2, kJ coaditiad,s ,.. �-• �C�..aGl4�. �E�i'a�t 7. Locatica *ketch.mtp (draw k Jabal•" a. ApProxciiaata propsrtp aides wits and .aurrouddlaQ strIets, roads,-and proas artnt" laadgarks?s Lnt Siza t 3ai tsar t) or apgaox. acrmajgo.,, 9. �oastit3`�as (ek�ok ain�7 .Si YYtd s A. EgI.:Ql1®aC,.. � ti. Ciww cart c. Fatr�/, i1.;,lletsrierdeoei_ ae. No 1Q9�gr #q 4rAnco 10. is tha~ xokxurs a, {tl&ip,od?,, 11. Surrnit'hdt rggs (ebbek 26ro'than -Ona It nvcascst g 9 a. open ire*dam b. l#Aidtdt31 l c. Seatg6rsd ��i1d�,aB�.�o„ d. colkMslp built-up..��' cs, Caat�otdf.i�,Y.,. S-� �. (fthflY �z 12. Threats to Site: a. None known. b. 71rivate development t/`, c. Zoning d. Pub Yorke Project e. Vandalism f. Other 13. Dates of enclosed photograph(s) /9 ME: The following (Items 14-19) are for structures only. LC. Primary exterior building material: a. S�toner�+WV b."Brick c. Stucco P d Adobe _ e, IS. Is the Structure: K. On its original .site? I---. b. 'Moved? C. Unknown? 16. Year of initial Construction: This Dete`is: a.,Vactus - L be Estimszed _ 17. Architect f kaonnl:_� Is. Builder (f.f, known) _ 19. R.aW.ad F�xtur@s:; -s. 'Ba o _� b. Carriage house c. Outbousew_ v.. d. Sbed(s) e. Formal Gasden(s) " f. A1udm877�r n. aatertowerlpankhause_ h. Otfyoi _ L. NoneNtilICANCZ 20. Briefly state historical and/or architectural importanco (include dates, events, and persons %ffAQCist@d with 040 $ite whet kaown): 21. Msin them4'of the historic resources (check only on@)r a. Architecture b. Arts A Leisure c. Econo® cP?nduattrla8�,,- d. Government s' e. Explpratigalsettla:ss@at 2. Military_ e2. sources: List book , dac0entn, surveyn, p@PeSaDsl interviews and their, dates: ,$ na .r! �/2 Ldrn.A. 23. Date form prepared. L` " By (name): �• is i, _ Addredat-, Cliy: / Zip s Phones Or`Qn1znt&on:�i4f "Ad. City use Only .t=,, per,{ RESOLUTION NO. " A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAM0NGP, PLANNING COMMISSION i APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT" NO. 89-17 FOR A REQUEST TO ESTABL71SH A CHURCH IN AN EXISThNG BUILD1,NG TOTALING 16;457 SQUARE, FEET ON 2.42 ACRES 'OF LAND IN THE MEO MM, RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS' PER ACRE),' LOCATED AT THE. NORTHWEST CORNER OF 19TH STREET AND AMETHYST AVENUE, AND MAKING .FT DINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF, r. APN: 201-474-02 AND-03. A. Recitals. (i) Inland Area, Fellowship has filed an application, for the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit No. 89,-17 is described iru the title of this Resolution. Here"Inafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application". (ii) On,the 251:h of October,'1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a_ duly noticed public hearing on ti►e application and concludedsaid. r'N, hearing on that-date. (iii) All legal ,prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurrzd. S, Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence p.etsented to this 'Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on 'October 25, 1989, including written and oral staff reports, together, with 'public testimony, this. Commission hereby specifically finds as follows; (a) The application applies to property located at the northwest corner of-19th Street and Amethyst Avenue with a street .frontage of 640 feet and lot depth of'365 feet and is presently improved with an existing building, pavan parking areas, curb and gutter;'and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is senior citizen housing, the property to'. the "south of that site consists air a single n family ,residence, the prop^rty, to the east is developed with a post office, fire statio3 and offices, and the property to the west is a single family residence; and (c) The, property is zoned. "Medium Residential" by :the ti Oevelopwent code.,.,,, P1.ANN NG"COMMISSION''RESOLUTION NO CUP,89-17 - 1NLAND AREA FELLOWSHIP 'S OCT08ER 25, ;19$9 Page 2 ; 3. Based upon toe substant,al. 'eVrdence presented to this Commission -during the above-referee^ed. public hQ,ari`ng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in pdaragraphs'�I acrtf c'above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as foliowst," (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General".Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and1the purposes of th:fdistrict in which the sitejis�located. (b) ;That ,,the' proposed"use, together` with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to I the public health;; safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in tie vicinity. (c) That the proposed use compiles With-each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. This :Commission hereby firxlo`and certifies'that the.rpro3:ect has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the CaIifornia_Fhvironmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Comniss ion'hereby 'issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and! conclusions set forth in.paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby, approves the app.licat' n, subject to each aA every condition set: forth below' and in the attached' Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference: Planning _Division 1. Berming`, Tow' decorative wails, dense"landscaping, or any combination there.of �~ shall be provided to ;screen the parking, areas from view of Amethyst .Avenue and 19tk} Street. 2: The existing .grass area north of the northern access r-lste 1' shall be temporarily landscaped ;with a„ native' drddght tolerant, groundcover mix and a temporary, surface`irrigation system shalt be provided. installation shill .occur prior to occupancy. 3. The existing Pijus Radi'eta tree within the row of pa1ir trees sha,;;l ; be� relocated'�,within the planter neat- the northwest corner of the building, during Phase I'of the U improvertent pr,orrim prior to occupancy of the building,'' in accordance with i�,1?,arborist recommendations. "-4, A decorative.Mock wii shall be constructed along the west Z property line from the future access point for the property to the nest to 'the existing wall. The new pohti:on ,of.wall PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP,89-17 - INLAND AREA FELLOWSHIP OCTOBER 25,;`190 Page:3 cshould be af,,a material consistent"with the existing wall :l along the north and west property lines:, Said wall shall be completed within one (I) year of the Planning Commission ; approval, date of the project. Detailed plans "and e?euations=of the" �a.1.ls. .sh ]l be. ,revlevied=and- appftved-by:._ .. .:..__ the Planning Division prior" to,*the issuance of 64ild:ing permits; for said walls. In addition., the applicant shall contact ad,ioin.ing property owners to coordinate the removal of the;.existing chain link' fence-along the west property l i re. S. Interlocking pavers shall be included at bothvehicular entrances , and at a pedests an crossing near the main entrance to the building. SAd pavers shall be inFtal�led ''during the on-site.praving pori;ion of"the phasing Program. prior to occupancy of the buld�tng. ` ifia`�errial samples to be approved by City Planner- 6. A itiona.1- streetscape planting -along Amethyst Avenue, north of the :required accpss,point; shall be incorporated into Phase II 7. The proposed landscaping along the_t�:`st property line shall be in place within one (1) year':u cije Planning Commission approval date for this project. Other areas of harking -lot landscaping not already included. in Phas :`�I shall be incorporated into Phase I,.;which shall be installed prior to occupancy of the building. 8. 1he applicant shall f"file an application with. the, Planning Division for consideration of the: building as a Historic Landmark within one (1) year of the Planning Commission, approval date or prior to any construction of new. buildings, whichever:,occurs first, EngineeriM Division 1. W'Ne developer shall remove the existing overhead utility fines and poles located along the west.Project boundary prior to occupancy of the building. 2. Undergrounding of utilities in conformance with City policy will be required with future expansion of the site. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. r 'I MANNING C�OMMISSION'RUOLUTION N't) CUP 89 17 - INLAND 1 tL PELLWJ OCTOBER 26,,1989 \? Page 4 t APPROVED ENO ADOPTED 111S 25TH DAY OP: .TOB'Q' 2984. PLANNING COMmISSIflti OF THE CITY O� RANCHO CUCAMONG,q =, BY: Carry T'. mcf0el, Chiiripa5 ATTEST;_,, Brad, Sol er, Secretary I, .B.rad Buller, 'Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of.Ranchd Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resol4tion was.' dtly and regularly, introduced, passed, and adopted by tha;Planning Comnission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meting af"the.Plannifv Comissicp held on the 25th 'day of October, 1989, by the following vole=towmit: " .AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES COMMISSIONERS. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: �j f a; a r�t Ip� Y. Ipp F j W as-�$ ah�'bfm;!o S�v3Y �� to " `!2-g m' aS " 4,��f w,�.�a g= �pa pgy yp�YA. a 4 o a r C♦ u+- .c 3. J.'-v f h w � d4'.:w�ti�d a• Y q ^ NN 3 T »R M� �p�`^ .�M �p +�, y uy MT o.S .N ,�S.•. =—, •4�4d7i7R "� N Y.' tl •�Q++ Eta N.faF L ✓� N�N,VN Vdf! ^p CxNw++ �". 'O'R ~a«� YpQ4 Oo9 b MY�tAM}r�e -1 �.� ..^�l �t ht may a�C/a Fk, b Ve.. UY.yu S4W A3G.^_ 'Y wyy bC 1rJt li�'y c 5setg— D.- utN V V Cyyt Q U p Y HU'tl.N IICy +M' t/� C q C•.qg SSSVS. ,4a p � O �=u �` w a u ti. o t �yi� •�+ wy+ Qr(p A j{ ��wpyy� p1t p N@ a gltl�¢4 el O rq wLpp h+YSW41.1 ����y j N x Q ywda N 9S cam rl N Q 6 c�r +fit RX `tit ``l. • � � r.g17wT Sg. ! � 1P `p yV��a�+eNs�i�y a t.Cg 7 t� r �WW.�.�4r$ .Q i o� �J■■■LQ■,�Y�`o��`o a: �c nY Z`u°��i app g u pr1 Yo`�e $..$� C y M^' 2S'A M Y fJ�✓,. �G� i •4�Y�A •�M 4 A o V{)� Q r y G LL Y O6yCj 4wsw �� L NCqq �GYi•UIO ��N� 0"�eA +a.VM� �.L N..C��Np p O. •4ni d). • ` qi M�r Yb w�V{y0�4g. its p�'S �33 Nq yA� Q CqC��pp 69 d �Cy rA 7a�4� y`•.p qqqq M�t C qC y L Ny q..Y 6•i `3V3y G9�Sx {� C`A�. C�� �US.U•G w'�o� .rp.� y 0 Y O L V w �A ji7.4gg Y '� cee Ro .`mop ®r wN� u� `•� i aiy,� p4,g a ue�N� ,Sri.N•.L L °rCt`^On �� •• mac,yy G xr NCL p'O uyO V L,�V YPgq{G��N1 L ^.'yya.4 O Y 4 C Y QQ p L Y B 4 �,V Vf z p��2 C O COM « A�O.0 d r' ♦/`R� mill �`C~9 a .. 3II�ffypN NL6dCyCAC�^ wyy0 N OpY u0.utl. 1^�IT•rY�> GGU C ��r ar�V}p�6 YYe'yp�i 4 OU r0 V kffb�OC 1.,C gjCY 1r 4p :R: i 1 � ��`,G�w&~i �^� �c 1 04Lt� C�1+ .gr CAdY\',-~Y'pya�YO ,•Y¢`,�mC,Lp Y^ •Yi.. ICY _� Ctl _OM Y i�C G q G NN�• 9V�CCN�"`` 3 >•r_�rq$ Y pG tT 0 1 � 1� 73 VY V'Y.. LO itP »si,., F. agv�`a Y'4.���' �•� ape,« is �$yN`_ si �.�S�� �gc��il •� KiSc^Y �N?`Ed` A£"N`!`G$av3 %" .2wQ M i«� W �1 & F:L`o33 `1� •� y ! C La N,. C 6 C C C L A.N w r 9 K d 6 441 46 ' aO.tl tr `N Vyy �:.■ Vr�-. C �L.7�'A�LO •_ .gC^a Kw�LL� tt C »N M i 4� tt Mp Y o L •+ A _ VO p� {ui _ ' S�w� $� ��,� Yvy YA�., .�r N 5w� �V� •I tT�N.�t YV.prY N QO m � !■ ��.�Y Y^ �7�M ��0 G..�:. YV ~�o••ty ^�^ :.NN�rpmb�. @.Y���d N �a Y 4Y�Q'!E biq Vq eo Mq 0.��a ��/ �Hd �`:� •HS L3-�W,�M d�.�6Mq ���y�� �~y..�.��� y6 Ay'Q PNaw gg� r�cy 6•'ta �' Y g�r Ys- c �ii« O 0 7gPg lL� ■ YQ �. ffi. � A' O•r1.m40 `�.e� ffi MyY� •� L sp O 3 W1 i _ Nr»rr IJ Va L V p V qy� tip A � yR O�4 O • �� Y0. o aAa LL yO. aA tlyp (N��.:M H1V •�.�.�M���tl p CN Y�.y� W�y.� p��67 �yy .�V v O ^ V•. VA^ 0 S ®3 VV:Pi •a Ow V lu O g _ O o _ 9�Q �' g�@O YISOO `�1��a ..�C� r� •em .ZAS� � s�'s•. w y pr•C a.IYCO N ��WEI Kr.M.Li WW KV J�®6YY �P p.� a MUM!" 4G�c "Al o . a iso� N NNL 6 I.Oi Y H 1Vqq. 'O pq 0 V_s. C M 0 C V MG V O'I E— qV O $ A q V �LL�� r R Z.O'a g. I• •r3 � +�� ty.L Q y �Y y" d�9 �d.'• OL�•�.. ���.�N �� try V^. L p O. '.. auRY N$N GpL L=� L .^N..aV . •y toN�O�N C;.O N CN V�Y.qLq V YC C� Y R. '^T�^ 'R•� 1 uY� eNpO.. N�yyu v.ry .x�YNWb'p p 6^= �� ``'�II�.. c. O qqL O p N6 1e w SSy Cyy^y A Yy� O ^I~O 4�O q Y C� �qwM 1yWS `�M V�N '4 9,YL,C Y.fiNL C�®.. L tVC •��. �0���}� a V Y Y Y 7riYL I_ � Yv L'QOYnp,N Cr.^,y;1 Ny.. CYatl�• L �Si .eYL- /•� `L�p i L W L D•. y q x N 4 0`.�C.'V CA w �'' C c w' w g�qi Y: �,��w •..... r,Q� R�N ow �Y. r.w" arc M'N'> ^ �t..: n,A ►.> ua 4gy@�yYG{�� ^'�L V 1 N `Cy G`n. G n 6 01 w N N y.^O N♦ V 8�S a Q C. L+L O..L M �C L w L ■W'L O}1 �N~ N��� ~OL�•01 tl!C ti tl N Y � N c w... C _V C O ,• S qq _ cp q O{7�$C�iy Cp YnwL.Y N • y '.�• s Y�. �j p �^O • ..m C �w ^C Y II Sh N GbL1^ 4.'y aMS Y r q` Y 1Y N S}e N g x.� •0 Y ~•_^� ��wr'i� i ■Np �.. - g ��' �-£1ps .Y qq� <��q`1�y L Y,CL• yy9 ^ q-s CC� A W L pm .^. G w�qa Y Ma NO �� �� �Yi gwe �� =p0 �`�nu$•y YY^4 Ln t N.M CCY 7:. °'.. � i. � .. CO •+:Ng4y •Ow�. Q32 �i Zpq wRix: -3 .iel� q.J +. .. q vu`� �i^ 'yy�LYY Gi*IT O®�y GG oc b,S yy ff�� N^ n� N. .0 q.V�.,wP 9 I Lppq oy�'�G H o�OC p;y`y yN6V t�! Nl3N. N•C3 pa `',YO O�p� Cze L. L �M C y C N �Y Hum CY • Q � Yy C9y L L. �x[ C�ae a�� .eraaq`i' u U— mi a+7e Q+r L'.A w_� g� m y L No �:.`.a� a <oN �=a� <<ia :c`sf A`a. :dn 4 � -WEE &',Lo.«S3--z CS. OMB W Ott- .jtww � � of vcQYc °�cq om _ ggr 4 Cj ■i u fC1 Y OCC ' �'tJ. yS a: L '1 ✓��� .�q,�� VN��. May � Q�V��N��l^1.. �My� C OM ou �6LogpQ4y,+ A st U. Y 9r y�`g� NLs.n' G�rljg01 �C y '4'r 5- ¢c: {Oy�Urw Vr.1yyy yF�V�2FyC( 5V O� LLC�. OyVy■yCV1 yL. M Y s -a C O !9 N. I j V yy l�^ il3L» +4 tUJ �Y O,,¢Oy�]�eM Yj.iW •A.C.G� L_ Q p E� 71"r qyW yCCY G O 4. y {yL piL 8 Vy Mp„yy~�.yV�Su OYVY9� ^ Jq O 13 co w c m6oaY. pXU`1... -o q, CCRY4 VQ L1;$ NY y¢..� ` �' �� wTy�..e vq R�9. L..''u��'0�,:� �`r�!'� yi �S+� •iMi Y.VM Y #.:C O!` !V C 'q4y L ^! _n 4 � '` 7C t? M,�i,':C yG- �' �:I oo�`Y rs ar Y"C i b! fates J. 14..MLCgV ,�r M Y A J yyp{� s Y pppa NQN ~` � Y Y 3 LL l G 'q �y N4M '. Y 61 4 d.RY y» '21 Y C=+ 9 4CI G65 23, «i CGjlp. ft �p !Y E L V ^ .51a m M W � _ _ ?r0 6 C 14 @ �� Nw N D y p "Mr CmA 'a a n 'w .�,� � :E as o, �syc1."Q� «.oft p L 0 a ^ f.V^M R _s .1 _U9��j■ply~' .i mow. LL2,w :.t, :�Gr iw:.�I[3Y a ILl i N� W Q C w t O N i frl..a 31 r ' ��C, �►�pA';� »,°� O +8 � Jam' �»4.a " �. v} r 3 Q•Oy+ 2L Y QLw� C ' VfiN Mq � C CC/'L• �K k4 � u C9�� �� .� Viyltt N :» Ol4i'N �` µ■ W4 Y. 1y. ti k R.r. N o+yQ.}+»i �j yYi p�O� �gyyL�N Mw L qw # .C4 �- Y! M. M ay hi. K �� =QL q«{•�. C OIU� OEM asq H �#�N NM O.iI. 1 � � yw.Nyy� �9. (♦+��+��[ '.� kpw_dg�^ 'K�qyR`L 9t q %z'-* VUs9 Gnr O u+�s 7.r. +ar �yM LyC`I1'}wy. A«"....w.iµ�. V 4 Ss� CwiY i� atii�n ;LJC ��tM asLe. 5-8.. _ ^4 a e r$+�i cam -w vah. a,LF .wgwar ;i # q�g a4q roc y�. "4°96 .gi' YwyiY a tF,4wN 4. µtlW1 uYgl_ALu q Ali M +�r «'811 AS ads $w o syr' g a°ty ` �' $` ► �`.L 3' +.0 a my v lit 1.5 fil i11. :* . = yyay!R :Ceoif 4t„ . N d �V$qp{ _.�• 4 y4 ry�r25 AS ,p NArr+wQ myQ.I yy yx ea 6 VIM AINk .; ;` u Kad u. $u u r N N o 6g6d YW LwV Q -� a�NNO N � � awJ1. a _ «d a O.d r � � � ��N C N ► � �q c k 4 p �� $Macy u: :w�. a o n s. x e 8`• W;g.. L1pN `yLA C5 .I YE V Np py yy9yyQ 1u 4 dM1 q�Mp nd'L L q'SSYN an; v.�ww CY w�` � JL}w� ��Ldp l �� �•�� �Y� ar � d �a /'O tz 'o�Gl�d �63 ��M C .■.y NNw.Y� y �� y l;� n4 �, tY.�NOu, w�. W y��o �' �o.ati P :.•cr �o'.,a'ci dp 3: ^r. s.'+ ,.. / M 4d G C M Y W Y µ.� Q V 9 q 1 p y W V �` Y V y�- qY r •V.V 4`.5 V.`3 a S 'su ar W`.efZa $ uv 40. w .�. rpiu.r rtc'. 31 Q:y1 � LY L t1Q td Yr OyY AY 3 m Vy y�y C« �.70 Lt Meta au 50 VW �i OM:. Doi '1iVlL � 0.. w5 It tO ffi, 'C aYy. $ -"'—a yMy�O. Y r L Yy v 01 N C e L a V~ ! t;1 C ` wa Y 88 v r Or.,Ms S '. £ ' 1+960su�pi.M. a all 'oe E VL NN N.V� N,wC 4o .Y. qL L,b � �Yr: yM COpN Oq'q} 7�r pYy N h �a. all a-jj- l�• O y■C NC_ N YYYg � � � � � �y�� .Sr M+p W iy qy L _V_ t a N4N CY M C9 M O�C� mLNX �VJ r 3s!4 S R l' as W i _ Y VN Y p S L iL on T J�G e N L V N e$ Cy �'d 1'. Y Y•�N �.L nO pNWW CO rN1Vff M1 �( Y '' ILUG. UCr i ✓YC N K'. .tlq HN C~ LO `.ta5 43S Y es ua'u Yn' L c Y r�r '.''°.S2' -a Lo * c�� �_ m A Z=c `Y •.'�,N4, Y d6q V15 ~ f-% L:Y �f1� Y Qfi 'ON O�.r' yL 1 St u + �;.r 4m cM.L{p�, p O Ws n' .LY.os'a� «" sw N1� Y.Lm2 yySgyY NW S��•Q. .50 yL. ��@ T C A L C O V L3 L "oOV L{C! N S 6 �i s�LYp� 6Iy����i ��• Qfa `.. �4 � '*.l C� `rC1�Y S�y.:i. Slt.�y L O'..A G 7 q M` N pN�j L}�Oy M 7 Rot !'m .y 0 N O '�r•,GpY�. Fay.a�. Yqq.� O/ .0 YY Nd Y SC1 Oii7 Op�iC ,� •n ^...' a 6~®m byy K N ✓M N Y r W p..c� w x CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 25, 1989' TO: Chairman and Members o the. Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller; City Planner BY: Brett Horner, Associate Planner' SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA POMMUNITY :LAN AMENDMENT 89-01 - WESTERN PROPERTIES- A request to change various school, trail„and park=site designations; to allow the establishment of <auto service stations! and mini- Warehouse I uses subject to 11the Conditional Use "Permit;' process. along major arterials;, to delete ra portion of Orchard Avenue; ; and,. to update the Landscape fiesibr Guidelines and land use map, to reflect, previous proje, �, approvals ;and "as=built" conditions -,APN: 227-151-08, 13, and. 14; 1077-421-01, 16 and 118 and 1077-091-36. " 1 I. BACKGROUND: Western Properties has submitted this amendment to the Terra Vista Community Plan in order to update many of the changes which have occurred over the past several years. Since -' 1983, when the plan was first adoptei., a number of conditions for; developmenthave changed; For instance. the Etiwanda School: district has indicated that only one elementary school ",is needed east of Milliken Avenue. Furthermore, several of the school and'. park sites have been relocated, traits have been realigned, landscaping guidelines have been revised, and land uses have been changed (in accordance with the Plan through the Development Review process). The applicant also made several land use changes,` such as the relocation of the 'YMCA site. However, the applicant is not iy seeking a ' higher, or lower, density than the plan currently ailows. A "neutral denstyrc concept is utilized. No additional dwelling dweliin units will bepermitted 1 ` 9 under this .amendment, II. ANALYSIS: this amendment changes several sections of the Terra. TRa ,:ommunity Plan. The changes are listed: and discussed, below and are shown graphically on two exhbits,_A and ;3, which are attached.. >III A.,. School site,revisions: When the junior high school site on Rochester ANenue •Ywhich functioned as the eastern terminus for the Greenway sys,4em) was deleted Per a request,!'the Eti�eanda S chool District; the;Planning Commission requested that a nek' k f ITEA9 k 1, I� PLANNING "COEiMi55TON STAFF REPORT' TVGA AMEND.,$9-01-OEST.ERN PROPS TItS Al pi October 25'. 1989 , Page:2 terminut. be provided, Lewis.Homes ;proposes to relocate' the elementary school site originally proposed between Terra Ilsta Parkway and Mounta i n7 View Drive (approximately 400 feet east of Milliken Avenue) to. the northeast. corner of Mountains Viev� Pa Drive and Terra V4sta Parkway and have ti function,.,3s �;.he eastern terminus of,the Greenway trail system,. A pack will j also be located adjacent to this new 11075 acre school site, Which the Etiwanda School District (ESO) has accepted, The ESD has also indicated ; that it will need only ,one elementary school east of Milliken Avenue, Therefo�lpe, the 8- acre- school site proposed off Of- Orchard Avenue is beina . deleted. B. Park Site Revisions: The -Parks and Recreation Commission noted that if the school site on Orchard fivenue is deleted, the adjacent East Greenway park becomes unneceswy;in view of its proximity to the relocated and expanded Mfilliken Fvenue park (north of the YMCA site) and the relocated Bark 'at. the end of the Greenv►ay. _ Although this park is being deleted, its acreage is more than being made up for by: increasing .the acreage of several .other parks, Milliken Avehae park wili+. be increased from 8 acres to 20.54.acres and La: Mission Park (at the northwest corner of:Elm Avenue and Church Street) will be increased from 5 acres, to, 9.5 acres La�/Mission park, it should be noted, also 6im.ti.ons as a `retention basin for 100- year ,storm water 0ri5inaily two parks were intended to act as` retention basins for storm water,'; Nowever, City staff requested .that only, one park,' ;La MISSioh-,Vark, be., d'e,igned to funct,on as a retention site as. -well as a:,park. As a result of the elim,..Stion. of storm'water° 1etention ;from the Milliken, Avenue. park, this park and the Recreational i Commercial, (RC) :site-albng-'Milliken- Avenue are 0rop'osed toy be switched to that the park borders, the,Greenwa.�,_tray system, The, RC site thus. moves,.to.;the northeast "corner` f Milliken , Avenue and ,Church Street,. The YMCA facility, which ;bas":been approved by=the Planning •Commission,, will be located"Mithip the park site zone, C. Trail realignn-,ents: The trail system east of Milliken Avenue reflects t`"arious school and park site relocations and has been revised to int• rface with the new easterly Greenway trail terminus, ;A traffic signal will be required at this mid-block trail crossing :,on Terra Vstei Parkway. A. signalized intersecti-an will, also "be installed 'at Base.Cine;Road where the trail -links UP U-the Victoria planned Cof.;nuniiy, trail: no the north ;;ide of 'Base ,road, at Mountain View Drive. A' . • N PLANNING COMMISSION $TAFF :REQORT _ - TVCP AMEND.89-0141ESTERN PR6,PERTIES October 25, 1989 Page 3 streetside trail, similar to the one on the ;north side of Elm Avenue (east and vies :f Spruce Menue) will be provided on the north sine of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway (east of Mountain View Drive)'. D. Orchard Avenue Deletion'; Since the elementary school 'jite J5r. being deleted on Orchard, Avenue, public,street access. i, no i longer needed in this area of the plan. Thus, the'sect lon of this road between Church Street and Terra Yista, Parkway' is ' proposed for deletion. The;City`s Traffic Engineering section has reviewed the proposed deletion and has indicated that it would be an acceptable change. E. Landscape Design'Guidelines: Oar` January 25, 1989, staff ind Lewis Homes presented .a new street tree master plan and updated landscaping guidelines to the 'Commission as A.-courtesy review. These cha-,,rges were worked' out with Planning and Engineering staff, but were not adopted by Resolution. The Terra Vista Community Plan landscape standards will thus be updated o0y in sections which: contradict the agreed-upon landscape revisions made earlier this year. F. Land Use Map UMates: The land use map in the" pjan is also, being revised and updated to _reflect recent' changes in land' use. and ;in the school, park, and` trail locations. For instance, the Office Professional (OP) and Commercial (C) designations shown on a portion Gf the Town Center development are being corrected to Community Commercial (CC). The RC zone, where the YMCA s to will be, locate{, is tieing moved southward to accommodate the Milliken Rvenue par:k which was relocated sn that it could be adjacent to the Greenway trail. :n addition, various zoning designations ha,.+e been changed toi reflect their "as-built" status. T(e Terra Vista Community plan has ,always permitted..development at one density range higher or- lower than the ariginal designation. Since 1,983, this has. occurred with several projects throughout the plan. Thia amendment will reflect the latest land use revisions, The only significant land ust change occurs: where the school and. park site has been deleted along Orchard Avenue. This area has been redesignated :as Medium High (MH,) Dans:ity Residential 24-24 dwelin units ( g per acre)'. The applicant proposes to extend the MH site west of the deleted school -and+ park site However, 4his ,wi11 not affect the density of he overall. plan, as park acreage has been increased and Medium (M) Density Residential ,a�leeage decreased (from 328. acres tb 300.1 acres'). A summa'hy of land use acreage changes' is provided on Exhibit "G". ' PLANNING C=174'ISSI0N STAFF REPORT `k. - TVCP AMEND 89-01-44ESTERN PROPERTIES October=250 1989 Page 4 G. Auto Service and Public Service U;es: The applicant also requests to amend the plan to permit, subject to a Conditional ._: Use Permit, auto service stat,oR";, mini-war`ehousejstorage 1 uses, and uecreational vehicle storaage uses. Auto service' stations .,%-Juld only be located along Haven, Base Line,:. Rochester, Foothill, and/or Milliken Avenue. In addition, they would need to be separatel from residential uses by a street, additional landscape ,setback, or other "buffer" of" ron-resident al use satisfactory to the 'Planning Commission. Staff believes this proposal is acceptable..since: al] ,of these uses would be subject to Design Reviews and processing of a Conditional Use Permit. H. "Local Street ;Standard.- In reviewing the propusdd amendment, the-Enfinaerng Division believes it is :appropriate to==revise the lok,.I,ii street design to incorporate parkways and eliminate the curb adyacent Sidewalk' staadard origginally approved for Terra Vista. This`'would increase the locW3 street dedication from 46 feet in wydl`t=to 60 <feet in width, which 'is the :City'- local street standard in the area outside of Terra Vista,` Victoria, and the Ca-eyn Planned Communities. The •Engineering Division believes that; there; are sir;ety, aesthetic, and convenience '-concerns with sidewalks directly`, adjacent to `?the curb. If parkways are provided the pedestrian is Jurther-. removed from vehicular circulation'. The . parkway provides an area for. street tree `planting, and additional landscaping. Further, r the ' pedestrian is not - inconvenienced; by having to walks around mail boxes and other utility installations, and does not have to negotiate drive approaches. Lewis Homes has indicated that they do not. favor' revising the: street, standard because it involves iddit onal street' dedication and would` require modifying,- i�r,+ many, cases, the design.of singleJgmi y ,homes to meet driveway setbacks.; As a compromise, Lewis Homes, has proposed to:provide parkways on local streets on one'or just a few local streets within each new tract. These streets would be. the more heavily traveled , local streets,'such as those connectfng to or separating:other tracts (i.e.,' a sub-collector) The Commission should determine whether the local ,street standard should remain as currently designed or changed to nclude ,'parkways, either on all local streets, or just the more prominent local streetS."`��r ExF�fbit'"D" depicts the two alternatives: The street sections within the Plan will need to be "changed depending on the . Co!snnission's determination. PLANNING COMMISSTON�:\!AFF'REPORT' } -.TVCP AMEND 69 01 WESt RN'PROPERTLES Octaber 25, 1989. Page 5 l. �� 54• rJ ff _ III. ENVIRONMENTAL--ASSESSN;ENT.- Staff h=s ce plated Part ZI of ,the Environmental Checklist and has tart I of the Inits3l Study. The project Will not be detrimental tc� adjacent;properties ' and will not cause significant - envIronmental In addition, the proposed project will not . conflict_,With the obj'ecti.ves of the Cener ,l Plan; it iii11 .comply with`alt ;applicable r City Standards. Foa cormplete .environmeniial evaluation, please refer to th,e (,Initial Study,,,Part'T1 Tf 4,i`zGommissiorn aoncur5 with the staff,`findings, a :Negative Kelaratidn ;should be prepared and recommended to the City Council. t IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In considering the proposed Amendment to the Terra Visa Planned Community,,the Planning CoGimisslon must make the following'::findings: t. 1. The Amendment does nr conflict with the land use policies of the General P,lan.�,;and 2. The Amendment promotes the goals of the land use element; and 3. The Amendment would not ib materially inju^'9ous or detrimental to adjacent properties. V. CORRESPONDENCE: This: item has been advertised in The Daily Report newspaper as a' public hearing and the pro'perties, in question.have been posted. Notices- have been sent to all property ownars within 300 feet of the sites proposed foe K4W zoning des gnaiions. VI. -RECOMMENDATION: Staff rectmmends that the Planning -commission adopt the attached Re,solutii�c,, recommending approval to the city Council; /Res f ly'su . ed, Brad r City Peer BB.BH:js • -t 7C ��r PLANNINOCOMMISSTDNSTAFF REPORT TVC'O P,MEND-99-01-WESTERN PROPERTIES lctAer 25, 1989 Page 6 Attachments:, I'Exhi bit 'A" Existing Land U,, Map " n Exhibit- B Proposed�tand t1�e�Ma'�3de`ptctin�-a11 -Land Uaa Revisions. : Exhibit "G" Summary of Land Use Acreage Changes Exhibit•,D".- Lod'al Street Section Proposals Exhibit ."E�r- Le•i der from the Etiwand. School District' Resolution Recommending;AOprova;l �o City CounciT�� Colmtunity V1an Amendment101 'i �3 1 .z 7 NC M q 1` 1 M _ J ap M M M LM M NC MH i M LAB M t I t �/ MH I, LM LM �+y w. � � p LM LM Lmi17 M I MH LM / Lm. 1 r M ti Lh! M M LM op ♦ } LM 1 p + aP +�\ E Iyl LM H MH H l + cc \ Moc op a arc ,M�OFw MHO �.. �. _ it EXISTING LAND USE PLAN � � IL mom (�:mvw cccouwuwv Area proposed for Ac , lanc, U% ctlang aap a maw smm `m .ArFi .aBeatt�sa+caS�w _ E uaatnmrtcxo% AL ro�e p ww ION YZ wearaa mmm Pi SOLE: as. i i LM % LM tic < j [ op _M_ �M_ LM lA NC M"/I' — LM ( �LM MH (i P+ LM LM LM E r a M LM JrH N gar j l�iP 7 LM P P MH l\p . m L" H MH H r. I P p CG �` Moe J CG ILQACMOFNH OP � ��+ ` WHO 8,0 acaea K Y -soorciLsvc { PROPOSED LAND USE PLAN � ``�" ,� CW� H, tumeoost+r nrwowAel CC ¢casamrrcOWmmmL e NC Yeaxal Re P op orarc �pAr�w,torY�YvtY,tc�ttw - �eoA.enaAt,oFnca • AArR�l4AID:FRCE711l9� J JJ�t1i0i07A00.VwTs1 p win waSTW Crry,O ,. NGA Ili: . ION 74 a . rvJ vvs 4•N'fl'� .N.4wr+rnr'• �. � � . Table 111-2 LAND USE SUMMARY Amendment 11, 02: And 113, Revised to Correspond to Adopted Map " Alidranga 'Nu er of Guess Dwelling Units/ Dwelling €3timsted Estimated AcrwN :Gross Awe Units Persons/ Number of IAC) IOU/AC) IOU) Household Persons RESIDENTIAL Low M_ um Oeneity (4-8 DU/AC) M 6 1732' 3,43 5.941 Medium Density (4-14 DU/AC) 328.7 9 2958. 2.592 7,632 Medium High Density (14-24 DU/AC) 106.4 19 1964` 1.52 2.955 High Density(24-30 OU/AC) 54.3 27 1466 1.53 2.243 Subtotal (Residential) 784.4 8120 14,301 COMMERCIAL MIXED USE' community Commercial 35.6 Commercial 11.0 Neighborhood 26.0 Office Park 90.9 RecreNtionai Commercial 9.9 Mixed Use-Financial, Commercial, etc. 16.8 Mixed Use`-Medial,Office,. etc. 21.0 Mixed Use'-Offico, Commercial, etc. 41.9 Subtotal (Commercial/Mixed Use) 252.2 QUASI-PUBLIC AND PUBLIC Hospitaf 100 Schools 51.2 Central Park (Proposed by General Plan)- 99.2 Parks and Trails> 42.6 Special Landscape(Loop)Akdlan) 4.8 Flood Control/Saveation 12:4 Subtotal tQussl-Public and public) 220.3 MAJOR HIGHWAYS* 64.1 TOTAL- - 1.32110 181801. 1, ;i w x 1 or.t .•, �.i�iaRT �� ff ���- 1 kad Ilk- II y b1, ,7M.'t•p 4•� GHOali �r Table i14-2 LAND USE SUMMARY Amendment#1., 12. if3, and 46:Revised to Correspond to Adopted Map Midrange Number of Cross 0.1111.9 Units! dwelling_ Estimated Estimated Acres Gross Aare Units Persons/ Number of (ACI IOU/AC). (DU) Household` Persons RESIDENTIAL Low Medium Density 14-8 DU/AC) 310.1.1 6 1825, 3.43 61259 Medium Density 14.14 OU/AC) 304.1 9 2700 Z.58° 6.966 Medium High Density (14-23"DUTAC) 1141; 19 2$13 1.52 31219 High Density (24.30 DUTACI 511.7 21 14:r7 t.53, 2.259 Subtotal (Residential) 779.6 $120 13,703 COMMERCIAL MIXED USE* COmmun ty Commercial 35.6 Cornmcrciz, 1110 Neighborhood 26.4 Office Park 90.9 Recreational Commercial $17 Mixed Use"-Financial. Commercial etc. Is;& Mixed Use"-Medical, Office.etc. 21.0 Mixed Use,-Offices Cnmme":d. etc. 41.9 Subtotal (Commercial/Mixed Use) 252.9 UASI-PUBLIC AND PU9LICa p tat. i0:D Schools 46 0 Central Park(Proposed by General:'Dian)' 99.2 Parks and Tralie 51.9 Special Landscape(Loop`Med?an) 4.9 Flood ControllReercatian 12.4 Subtotal (Quasi-Pubtic and Publici , 224.4 MAJOR HIGHWAYS' 64. TOTAL 1.321.11 8120 18,7D7 -32 REVISED Amendment No. 6 FOOTNOTES FOR STATISTICAL SUMMARY ? it is assumed that a portion of the land shown to Major highways acreage includes hatf-width rights- residential use will be developed In community of-ray for Foothill.Haven,Rocha:ter.Base Line east uses through the prtxass described a(sawhcrn in of Miilikens and Mttililan nOrt(1 of f;asa Tina*, and this plan. For this reason. 6.+t ems of Low fall-width rights-of-way for Milliken south of Best Medium Denslly and 3.4 aeras of MiadI-High tins and Sne 11ne most of Mltlikan. Density which appear ai the tend`Use el.n era excluded from the rasld 0.1 dwelling aicalationa 'With density bm.us, , a total of 9,338 units Are an the previous pzct, permitted in Terra%Iata. ' Household site for Medium Density residential to "Park and'trail 40.20 a cf,SI.3 ehown en the Land an arithmetic 'average. based on the estimated Uto Summary and Land Use alah {pages 111-23 and distribution of types of davllings to be built._ See I V-151 exceeds the 47.86 acrt requ)remart M.06 Chapter VI of the Tama Vista text. acres par page Vf-3 less 8.2 eeras private open space credit per the Park implementation Plsn) by a Descriptions of commer clai hutd uses Indicate the approximately four acres. 'Grail r(dtha and locations general type of devetepment considered. Actual may change slightly as developments proceed through permitted land uses are"umarated in Chapter Y the planning pprocass,and a portion of the pant(end of.the Terra Vista text. shown an Mt(fiken A*nue may be 'convertad to another boo mun(ty us(''(a YMCA),but In no event Commerciai soresges in Mixed Us* parcels will public park, gresnway and "I ,aer" fail exclude rssidnntlal uses, estimated to tout 6.5 below 41.9. acres of High Density, t8.8 worst of Medium High Or City, and 9.9 wares of Medium Density a`now a part of City Park. residential. ° Specific tacaiionn for community uses are not da"ln4d by this plan because the sita liter azd location desired will vary depending an the usar. However, It is estimated that 9.9 acres. not Included In the tabulation of public and quasi- us".c acreage: t11!( be developed in community 1 j�, t f �n UPS ' AN Q�„ us". Sae Note t shove. /V W b^fE t/.T`w m C- 2- 11 j t S��IISI'MC►!I' -Fie v41;3►es c S+e��wrtlk A$Yh S'c�rs S j vol¢/ 5�e.�t Cie. EXISTING LOCAL, STREET STANDARD a i 71�a�kwAyFpx- _ ��+J,`¢cs a,oletarurl� PROPOSED LOCAL STREET STANDARD Fo►' all local streets or for more major 10ca! WOWS within a tract Board of Troateas R.G.(Jerry) Bredlau Gar><R.Collins David W Long Marshall B.Pruitt agdxninistrlCtrrt� Cecilia Solorio �-gr) ffida+� Ank P.O.Box 248,Etiwanda,California 91739 t7141 899-2451 April 5, 1989 City of Rancho Cucamonga Attention: Planning Division P, 0. 'Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 To Whom It May Concern: Etiwanda School District concurs with Lewis Development Company's requested amendment to the Terra Vista plan, 'deleting the two eight-6cre sci:nol sites at Mountain View and Orchard Avenues, and replacing them with a single, net ten-acre site and adjacent five-acre park at the southeast corner of Terra Vista Parkway and. Mountain View. Our analysis of districtwide needs: and resources has ,I,onvinced us that a single, larger school in Terra Vista is more feasible than the two schools originally planned there. i Sincerely, � Carleton P. Lightf t Superintendent I f CPL:rg " 1UN (t RED,;cv7T0[I b` . A RES,OW1710.4 OF TH%;RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECONONDING AP,PROVNL,,,,of TERRA VISTA OLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT NO. 89-01, -TO MODIFY THE COMMUNITY PLAN TO CHANGE VARIOUS SCHOOL, TRAIL, AND PARK SITEOESIGNATIONS, :,, TO ALLOW 'THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AUTO SERVICE *NATIONS. AND MINI-WAREHOUSE USES, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PROr"X, ' ALONG MAJOR ARTERIA4S; TO DELETE A FJRTION OF-ORCHARD- AVENUE; AND �TO` GPDATE' THE LANDSCAPE DESIGN G41DELIN'ES AND LAND,,.,jSE MAPS yTO REFLECT PREVIOUS PROJECT APPROVALS AND "AS-BUILT" CONDITIONS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a duly advertised public' hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Terra Vista :Planned Community Amendment 89-01. SECTION is The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following,findings: A. The Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies,of the Generz:l Plan. i B. The Amendment promotes 'the goals of the Land Use Element, C. The Amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimentai to the adjacent properties. SECTION 2; The Ratcha �nga Planning Commission has found that this project will not create a significant odverse impact .on the environment and recommends is,uhnce of a Negative Declaration on October 25, 1989. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1„, That-pursuant to Section. 65850 to 65865 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga 'hereby recommends approval,of Terra Vista Planned Commun,;,d` Amendment No. 89-01, as attached. 2.' The Planning +?ommission 'hereby recommends that the City Council approve and: adopt Terra Vista Pianned Community Amendment 89-01, as attached, to :modify the Community Plar. 'to change various school, tram, and park site designations; to' allow the establishment of a+tto service 'stations and ':xini- warehouse uses, subject' to the Conditional Use Permit process, along major arterials; to delete a portion of orchard Avenue; and to update the Landscape Design, Guidelines and. land 'use maps to reflect previous project approvals' And, "as-built" conditions. _ PLANNING COMMISSION R OLu7IDN No. TVCP=R'iENDMENT 84-P1 etESTfRN PKOPERThSS Octoker`.25, '198e, Page :2 . APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF 9CTOBER 1989,, PLANNING-COMMISSION OF THE`CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMQEiGA BY: r Larry T. McNlelChai4an I ATTEST: Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary I, Brad Buller; Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission.' of the`City'af Rancho Cucamonga, do herebyl�rrrtify that the foregoing Resotutian�was duly"and regularly, introduced, passed, and adopted�by the Planning`'Commission of the City Of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regw: -r meeting df'the--olasmnino Commission held On the 25th day of"'?ctober I984,-,;by,the-=fai.lowing vo '_to=Wit: AYES, COMMISSIONERS. ;`,.,.. N`UES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: <•'>.�;` �y Aft Lt 1. t fl "71 w.r w Fir x4 C � E LU O ZOO ui r w il- 0 b Sf VJ S1 � 13 U r i t„ � 1 £5 p-0 Nu-'a m•O N M V O 'C L f a t0 «'p N'p 0 Q7 C Uf•� i0 = I- L. M.- C L h^ L C NC R pul O Q1Cd R �wa+..La.I.a+ sa. O. �QyON : CL aaMm 'yy'j G aaL aNwe �yG � ac vY Wa_ Ga�` `vl'S. L � .0.0« r a O D. O'Q C O L m m « �... ;;w N y sv G1 ipI _ L. 0 U« 6'f C 3 67 w cu n R O O S. a O Q1 fO U 6© O1 L�, Cl a N O•� N:a.e C C-w L. a-. U y 'C `> l0 In t CL 0 C.r, A'Z tea' � ,C r ro N :� C '.a.. > -d.N 'a u xC Co a~ ero ° C 'Ny. - L: Ep�ro �W aUw L. m > U `G. a.REa IO E aE boa >na as RCa I°n�'_ �. C� m.�+ ata�+ aY U uN 4aCL m a'co EE °J= °� EC � �_ C'Q � '�C e3tcc «}° Zmiu al �+ ° > ot.�7a� amis3o }« +�O;o. Via« In« °tzLG � � s MU •i C I«oU<C s� _ C uC a sQ 3 C a a o a a a v L C E .c am m-Y« CD OJ C g�z rn= C > Q w G =yr 3: N %. 0- a-,,, ai f° N G m 42 y C a g,a m y N�LCJ a 4 a w« o r. r`u,'3;p E cam a M m ia� a Lu a •0 o sa. e,R 4a a Rse :+ Ea-t "'a S. au " m Ccu � aEiasi cuiEa °' Nu�emcsia �ros>°; «C3 � �i� mo � � � y m�«. G N w p > mY m. S L a RU` o a N L .0 > L L,1 O 5,�..'6 X ILO_E N y i� N a .0 E$ L w w E a 0. L a A L O Iirl m` mI°� F-¢ � �r, !-.+ IocaC.¢ = ° ' o?a � O0.cLa� cm.n> ~. Cram fvov_roC a'0+' ,Cm0 OWIAC+ L f+ pp YE7aLnOL C & N L. ar f6 J.'a C S3 «.�:+ a•+ W .-N-CO W O a i0 a«:.43 E L v p,l«71. Vi O. O �`QN� m� V> m,w'. e+q�- L Ry N 00 & M r+:L1 R*k @ 00..42 a a`" R �:O O`w m 0 s Mc O a e rw .�+ U,Oq�C« y_ am Nt: .� mow �cAEc3cr> � c 'fa> $ g «1�- E � ��� cL+Y © eu'� aNN a4 v e« C « C eu w'a ° mE «a_ _mtn- F to; ` c w.., A H w a w E u L= , m G ,o w° ". A U awi m E w N.?`ca m �;` L'0 L �.'ej w"� m G y o « C '7�a-�C 6 O 45 +v 6• {y U 8i.C tf4=.�3��- t1 a y+ E O p N m _m C N L.6 a y C QC7.�+•41 y~ m L ��� LXt.me�-w >Y g C� �: L> $ o�y 1n a L,�> to ?�C o� O�� 0. H C m w w e mW• m > $� q9 CIpZ> C b -4) m C L � W,�0 IV O«�' a:cE c MU Z. L« Ci.`� eo m« c«1 .+ MCmm C c'c a o_ a� > L. m cv t '« ®. I I C,� L C C a '.c ul U ° N- C p,m S� « m ya•V fomamd «� woo9 �"« s.�?•,m�+ ; `-aoc. C�_G lr12 L m m a/ m 0CL ;rM >M,� U C CQ.`fALm '+ m s $ t .. e W 37 pp O e C a y V f°i o"V W 0 y lame � 6mi � �C O u.� � U'�� -min r� �gl °� a e o N w w L f0 ,tm a 'd C M S t o. m m �. L« C .� Ai Ci :L ° m X C y C a••o ay « C -a++ R. se cr= O C O N.� a a. N tCO C Y7 S 81 a W (A m« C • O'� W l«p a'C+•w m « Q °' L)'* j,7 lam.p aG+ w pL ~` C . -• '� Y�1 C 3 E m O= m j S' >`'C .a C L�' C'b 6a w N W CE.Cs�•oC«: R � Rw ` w 6.afj a �"� c� :�'G � '' 0" Hm � A �' Div •e $ a�°i �W m c d-° a a, '� � w o /La L7 wo w O eltS `� a " ¢- a Q+ « gI C C7m « c.«�[ CL C mC0AiCtS1� O C ® a w .C. N a m @•> 67 L L w to .+ N a w C U e9 E.0 m w... Oy m C 1 o A C..o m E'.-s z. s. i0.- •-w «° N L .� �„ " C 0. « a�S O I;. 3 i�'cn U o o+ w Q r. ol Q.a O C O I N C Ln of j.T. p M CC;L N L lO,.Ot r aci =Q I.N ra yM 3swHj tisap =>' °' sr4 cLmOR eQp'yre � �' ' L umyoa A7Lm « � O ^^ r amIV cu di G. LC7 (0 t7l0 jNr •� L '� sq, Q Q.ta H o Q,ro E i t sL. o= m t o i N y. m d � �C off+ '' w toa4)M sOC,'R R U 3 C c9 31 JC 0 C M ra C Z R N w• Lv a `w` g th > a 1.ye« Ccra O. y is � `x .� 'Y7 a � 's C1 O•~r.+ t» L Iv`� �;W'4 O L L,� L curo L w,o � fA ns = a, al s to ua z'>' tft > Ca *' y ts ar .G v► «« cq� r a a �y DJ N .�•^ 47 •_ So 'ID o Rf « ~`� `3 f4 jy 'C 6Ut u +Z ul ..t,S ?„°„' Ui 63 to m L uas �a+a{ 6iCQ.� w � u� Z (W a u0gQr L maws '' q ® ra 'Ci 47 .J 01a�+ gt'174t V to 0,0 to ESE °' aau ,j,= 'c C� at arr ,td H . 61 Iy F,r 71 I �#✓ J LU $ LU raw z J 1 E � 77, i or co b ! tile(i • � � w LU Cwuj I. �tw + w � Ulf MrA" CL F-3,7_7 r wIK . ... I 'O tU y N tt1 M r ?�O 01 tD 0?N 00 WZQ. Ln i,r4NC* r , I 17 y L ' cu R y N ft1 dCL N. O i � C N�00 r tD o, Cy em LM tD tD N r0lrnalr 00 O o' c C y W n G L t�oa a'i z:� tH yam" t�J'M�?' tDOOtT06�O'tAN ONNto01 'M .- O J J O LU to 00 toza.�v Ln rto®:M tD;r Or61N NG r.. e B. M N O tt1lt:o M r N:cn r N.?N N r id!ST Y L4 ~�N tD M Q N Q°1 r tV ' y� O ti C V d 4),In A d � L.Y to a�O �Ta W �Oiv g �Sl Uj L m C Gf v u to la t19 d A®:e c B L uof ch& < y�� J.x�s s s o m y��G,�L,�a C s .C40 !! _ -013Cea ®� E E0 W C L a•�:aa � t «=a'io 4 V gn CM— �r •fl C as 4! L y � co d C E E•H. N a,ta maaaaM Lj N Oa N Ln M 7 lu Z(L tD to mNO M y O 7 oN 7 Q j as �'tia ti7 Ln m wad° aiev a� a o ° 1.4 O. E y...✓_ ..�0^nt0 O � 3 c a zQ �NN�h c 0 a Zn .. - . y G " mu i ac o+_93 <cJ �caca� ta L. O tCl 41 taaa Q td z -� y 0 M aiM r%O tp O O Qa 1'�O O c Oa O O N M Oa?j r O J O G7 V O O?-4 cn A r w O m w s�a�.IN O G Qa's.8 NIA' ^,�a"Lnn M NCI! rN�'tit —amt!: N tD N J-Q M vi n N N M Y s Cam.. Cl .V 4D �. U a Clay 7 CL to l Ci aU® m u.x ccoo Z 00 s_ Co uJ ad ,a p C B E.rt.�"� totlaV 1. a. O {w{a�r'4' C cm 0 ?WC asi tt Z o.e ac'i. w' Q C un�i� Ct,w' ti.M O S V -�eo .. W b 41.•_ y d V d.o t a.'� Of d Bf.w !. 4 s+ W O . ® __..na.. s. _ ut— U 3 j W �•��� ` , aim ��a�y N �.�«Y� N O ��qp'7 tY a.'� x x It O ti m G g w �i a1F Y`T •a�a. a �w rat r 4.w�aw .w... Via: L N C N Cd'v�e:mC s Po� Po 6 m * a o.O_m ;• _G _ u C L O d ° C t«�rr W f0 O w M y C .G'J G.G.. 7 "'� G..oz -0 C> - . J ccp (AE y � 801 O O C.,N Po u.G ea w,: v,. u. S 61 C.C. a,Ul O � w o_Y o v ` o sag a' ro Q.s �M�} Po m o c� Gw o »+ k- NtN EE':m Po = Po dm �p O=co co d cv� a, ' OPoN � ' y19r: NWev'aPo > a'd L m 33' W> MA tZUR ¢ IZ6 a � : O 07JdMG Po N � Po:L «Ni O L: Po C Q (n 07 N C : 13 Ci M w 4p:S�. R7 V cys,_ aL Cn 47.(D .+ �-1 r aia GE Eca c L^aa a -ry'a 2v� O 20 O N V m in,5 3 L C C C L Y N Po cr ® o c �aNicLi� ai `� y ° r'a� C N« ',� d� C ' Po fn o L. `8 er fj C C U v ;,ul I- d � cd m p _ _cc r pL C w L fey.° S 4�„ L '` CL Ci++ m Q^ Y C w � el > (aPo L .p U. Po �.Se Lat � ; Pow Nm� � �?'o JA as « d0. 61 asBIPo PoN N._ 4) rA I._ 'p to N,�L eO® a. q m z, L a®�I� to L 61® 3k C S C aft�j ea Po '4i« CL E ".41. Po at L�:«Po .L .L d ,o+ q7 O ?.�7 d H N i4 a« N Po. L. �. �,} BJ .0 z N W Oi y• G V a V 61 C N ,✓ Po �5 y.. L � ,® 41 a0io w ti C1C4t0 wG) m0L :'.8!'0 °aZs0.y YP _ aus Gi V O a _ � C17 aLL �, C a CIL 4, r d $ � {y asE c, Ln 0vsa mw C « A'� L O_1 a a T` !L W.. =Ln 0_O U L in a � J'Caa. CE o a- i N c .0 0. >7 (p M M O i o uY NX-r am D a y t m L N ,p i d.1 �+. 1(� L.O m M O 'Z N a t0 O T L7 t°.0 U G L.q Cat a. C y w > L� a169 � LCa.a. °j.�Q� N-iy HN C..m LJ L ro mM as a„�� a tlia C« A.W L a • .A!r' tL0 U a—Mil 0.43 R•L 7'X., .LC b�d..�p d rii a a+Q > a a L �fV''CL ►-.ZO.UV1..d'RE`Q-iC.offi'L4 R C C R C Q � 11 r A N� J7 (71a a r��r r117 to M m - U COi O ni Q a M O1� cu c R _. a.i A L eq u� : L L L L L CEj L�'L7 N Aa Wy O� 0 N" mQSImMmm - mO7 m '� •� C a N -W ._.._ R �L n cp�} Cft U a L > Il LLILLLLLLL LL LL U. LL vG.L, d N E a6, Rama C r ° s 4C'C�R. o a y C 't7 .0 4') • ul i A U� i �.VI L • L I- a u of tai i al c ,- m 3 m 17 G L a - L � r a Q1n a a� L.a L 1� P� lL9 a $ R 41 1+1 S 5" u a Mi 41 4- elm CL C to cn s. H r N pad(� O. 10 �1 R & ^! �� 42! ytv f° L 'n L� J �' o� dM �� L tOy L C '. a 5+O 0'r w ri Q! M y Q 7 y' cI> L A LJ � C a'� in-/ CL a rlf® a y y fn L H d i -� ¢°, ry C �.c {fig e p .0 '.a- R y •N>41 » a . ^�« .+ >-yam_ C at .y 01 L2. U a L�: „S dl•.. �Vi q9 �+ c ro `� a r, ��.= g'a„ vne agi,o �� cL m (a cL G. I L6.S« ®•e 3 l� rr G! u.�•�� Go.. s.'O 6l CL it 4 sum .'., .MMW 1� j J I J Ask hS y t 0 CD ANIL .414ho oK, w a u n n c? ¢ • t 2U, lug C S ? M ol Y C s $ 3 IF �o v a,o. . d R a, N c ~ N c c 19 L y 3 a 3 m TE c E -FA m m�,0 N }4. aCi+^ �a�•F= A.tOc �"Qso °. N. L L > L N to Qj CD c~ Ee n �5 '�cs.o� .�su � 3>k' Ncn e+ CL _ > C E 3 CO N 6? dt. N`-,:x y C W O.: G 3~ E CI c �.0 R c13 S. ro y 5. o h a°'i �`E`•- L m le d C tfi PCs A.. �' N 'Z' C.. a d N ° N os S Quj tu 'tpy� �pp+, a== ;aF/ W a.�J2 ,L m C «� = Q1 dl C V O 6�1. •In � N coyL d� $ 'e s cry -13 � 3 � � hc �NC CC v Ct « L • N � ayL v dEE3 N m t6 • $. L y C.P EiWL . Z o cy q CM 4 X a y> yC sMN b i ® z 0 C O� c. F C Y^. F y✓ � t IIQ J #e Y. aJ'L G C Z7 Pa p'f at « Oat . 4.....+ � 87 �tA •'� 'f, os4a W,so.0 y LN .+ a,-- yaCtcf � C � cua.: to CL Q Gr° u✓.. .° a K CD� Lc o—.a0 atmas nRQ &Yu' � � � e w r<a � as E v a 0,`i eaQ to 3..w . * .c.iL.d p p 4 C83 Ln it «a�.i' ¢ aye �c ' a� Ul to CU '+per eo�a �i as o:C y.0 tti ca +C 'L as ,aEt C > slow I ..� wC yC'p VLF Cl IA•es C n Q d ai00 a At m at O w C � CO �i.r� ,� CL-�p 4tf C Ct �6t�t"• EZ:. �'' O'+�4":rey 3. ma$ al up PaeAj H Qg Nt C 4t d„. mulds r now �4 sp U. T-=.G 6iY CCi L'. L C :A C A a I� 6fCH Wf yC„i.� dB C 61=„ NM it sum .:. R aS. }„i3 } .G S3� .�,... Ctl. .,G p�y.0 t4 C Lr 4) _p ,?J i i i I r; �� �� ,o C a 0 w 9 W cc = 6 °oc�ca Lcu .Cvewc_cc+w 0 fa ' Vim..� Qi Ri� '.1.N dp tC N y M C� •O �_ V. f0.��..y C U. l9 .r1,_ O N r = L E 0 6.8 ro o e s cc N++. to 9d C{ i.0 - N 3 cc y ,arodw $ > u �' . wLUm • 'pro I T. MCY L i7 N N� L i eq C M F40 40 to 6e-CV �®.6 t/f u C q p Oop 43 a)�« a• N O^ i •a..L,,� i„ O 1�0 J a O - m w M* A 1aaa atis R ni �«oo0 a !11111 Mill!III! [II IN t_ �t t/ . .OWN tit `y. ql J � �i y ej� E R'..R N V.V O O F« v II u.�•m R s c v N j aLi, R^ ronb,�oF'o�3 p 6. CJ i E Vl to O LU 117 u `1.mO a— \\\ w w WoyucL''yib E _, CI*c L'.LL 61 L. R— L) Ln oc c171 rntR n Epp y ya c � tv 0 a N v N a E m c .C-r• aEi L +on E 'er Qy m m L6 N C AC'C.. U �a) : 6z12Q. y : L6 8« N V Ld y C Q: •L'r7�"...i�11C}+. .iv •3= C.S d JZ... Z C7 s- N R— L r LL lU.O N L a"a V..y Ix d 13 =s UC m °u�coatQiLo ram l '0 LD 01 A 49 LT 9 C C1 CIO C C 0 U O 1 aa a O'�'L7 07 s O G +A+;C y+a.CRtRi y C � C $ _ dN� Oyw C, wt7 _�QClR.� C1lw .0 'A tm En � :/f >`�M s O 4: ro L �' C7 � 'sr N C p:4.�7 i* y e U L N® R.:L si N.. 5 !W R L R k9,. ( L y .L?s..0 L� L s �.,R N L� v=s kt ` 7.�fy .0 La.O.O p A+•' L B.LN. N C31 L a i. A W N 61 Q1 O 'Al 9 N et,© N N y..Y C z d s5 s 0 ww(1talL�� :h- L �� aii �, $ W,� u�« d'� naa0. o„ — Hs m c c L L� �— 2 a 3 m` N•+ d a a p Cl O. 7 81 z N . S , m NN, m 'U.S` o Uc ri,.t.4y1 En .�YRO .H ®� ��rj5 t CR O . _ � .-� Ly O try V 15 OE 6 vps 3 � y R c o $ ¢t in `� (Accm•c oL „. 0a ,= d L a« �� moo= � A; cNO 'LN�a y tn&.9 a wIA O in 9 t➢ Ws C H0 .f6 N'LGLC. w O � L O aC > R C Q 'A .- L. CFs alp O X � L Xm N.t®. N. 3 C i� •� Fo EEr.�.. �+ ..:C w C p.ffi y QI di «+ dMc es� a« Nuc $� 3° c: LZcmtj a.v,Fas mZ , .+= _ c 'c c to L R" at ®C 4LN L� ; vet $�. oN d._. �' ��•- L C T cu q � >.Cs.yt6 �.� CRL,CA $ LS y. oK wO' ;,E � �- N Z La > �q _.L. „«� c QQH u >_� � c '�' c R C to L:.i3, Z X y : N d+aL+ C C— d C BCi.C-:�•� L C L. CD 37 C � ev a�..y A L L 'fl y d ; �- a'OPidL E+: :rL. GGi W�wib« N« O a�C f�F].h �.OeZ W w av: ro S 6.O w � e 'Q 41 L. O O N '(� NQFaa C N y �7 0 �•��� C o .c v � C w a C p cm U) a-Fj E C C � 97. as �o SU•j tu U Q. U y In a c a I c J2EM =� c _ Ce cLt rU" E, aew cn C ¢¢ tj �=�•� a 6:. G � a.W C O N O i 0.mU`bt;w O�•_d.wL'yc •po ' R LCO AV d Ca- O {Q ' 1wG 'Up +C a Q � oO V t- ra i+ « a U C.Z E ✓ a c c I C e0i y' O G7 L O LC 7 L•... L R O V a•, O E O a d C.C.6 V '7d Zwm.•$ a U.MO. e • cV H d G G X S. d m ,Q•-A+ i u) L,N s: cM 7-_ 4) U O.� .a• C.: to a A, � V Gt N .�aa..=•�; G f0« a AV m a a« Gci +'° w z a�i i th4-- atiwcwi > v�` p ai ai L, a V aEfa,3 S VM L. U 1 :Vl11 tT1G9L C O:a ns U a L �,.�, .,, O C: $ w w~ a•a.-.a tn. tG C- {� m N a O:.,c Q1 •� 'G V =Q.A•O�a w a d a. C G' A tpi y .Q a S 9 S. fp..� L C)O:. C•� i 01•-' C.O 04 p" •a 1 ioA � 4.� � alGLac. a.0cy� tG R •p Cd ? N to a p L C w- �7 L �R a'O.c O S >N c i 0 7 c d. . y.+ C ;9 i��...�a..0 a Q- W i i+ ACC EN E Gil > fair Q! C H a- - L 0'•V 44, C O .a m«� "O O w C � Q 19 a CO 0. >..a N e vU; r in to > 41-sue* Mto a V 8 iy:NX - .-.�a m aEa�V Q�c,p � .o,•-�«a � a N - U VC m ? yea a aS . O a V p i w O,V C � aw w � �p .aGN"- N'Q G 6L c lo � a •�G. O u OUO O L in 9 m JI c • C' Q Ea •Oasa � �` 9 =ActJt®:Sa•c � Cicy'tn a �E � waG Cam SG9ro � i yrv�N•o a®f� L«r- ®' a 4� C7" c V J C V raj �� y« O ,,a•. a �� a O G a� °'0 W to (n -c cU« cam � cayRc CyO dt dam•+ IqC � �� m m'° S. 3 a w aer:C 3 u e 1IIa = A O aI A•O+a.'c y;« o s� t7 •�+ A� � $� $ .°+ a.- d�'' �w«� 3� a �A'' sOa'G.�+ i ,,,� i M. •a L« O e .g 10 ,� C y. W ry . i C►� O a 'tl 7.- 19 O pN O° w • ty.'$-cV:'b LO aC ,4aocy:aa!•.'6epas�®wCW�p.3,. �ac1 Mdy--`.�t,C�d. .•8:.rt�=i.:.CTti�:.�Caf_«�Oi�'.,�iO...w.. iIS t4Na >' E3.C.+s.'.SGS Ow�D.• .«,to «U)"O cu cCC.a w a Va m p ic.- � « V O 6 >N a at iipCls �w'T w am iCC 31 `t> Ij per LAA U: ul r U. cc IL cc LO W. ccE � �+ 4 c9 Cy Ca' tiOa, OCNa,-- tn4, : L � ✓ ), y L:._,p._�«. �L�,�✓ L.._�+^-._..C._ O Q.�w O._ C A y t. Ot C2._i C..+ •v O ... us✓.+..iaf w > r- a � G'a0N > C,LLQ✓✓ d N�.. 0 F.z7CIp C✓ 7Q G�1Q✓sy .O-✓ U > O ✓ mE N > CCyp OQQL L..i'+y... i,.:My O �,L'_ 'd'Q O."'.Q ..L•� O d: U L.O110 LA O C e,N L ✓ L tO L �..G7 N : p N L 01 fl C'.N O ' IV }- Gl U ro dd C CI...s �y 1 U U NL. c G. Q1 "+ J"."^J ' 4 ✓ �S Q N: - y✓ L ii O L N O L.; 2 W O L.,.V O d u.0 y ..� d m' Z� 0, _o � �.. GCi O.J�Op✓CC.:E A3 ' U�:yL 'Q�. QIc.p. C 'II CL „_ m �O+ O1'in_ . rnpEo �; vN:. � y.vo cL_ � m_�' , e p L C L v Z G7:a a.4�. c•Q L Y O N ;d p L m N > C 07 07 L t' O .�! C 07 W,S c4 p Qt ur.w Gei l. � ai fNQ�� °Q R�w EF wty OM IL C ra ` = 's Ots4) C6 p "iGL=s� C� LJ3'rC« O C«a' C � � 0 66 3 L oca� o c,_ L �. a = L rTL � E 4. > C S-0 e N CLf.:+L+ 07 g C .Z�.N wSD �+ pT7 C✓t!r.... « N++ L 61 W=..'` C L os'o� aim« coio Lo � �`c°s' 'ncE �sQ,va ooF-C «.N• �� I% uri O.+« WYtr C .p+ CC � 7 0 ev r! C 0l:.o-,s A as eL+ a >. «_ N� N U C p }+'v, Cau C� oAX ~ ytU.«U. UCS.yE. p'A � QLIg1' «C' ` ML W ti Cd f8 OCN« E 6TL L NQIEaauI3k CQe'+ C VC01!.I+ i` ut Qp O 01 U A- L•_ Wpy iE L Oro O 9 N G� p.dCiO; O -:. E:NGi'wa �?,EL, O L« U w+ C G1 to U r+ M«r L G) ®l.A O m E C A t0 N o n U ti 0. U X L O.O O) Sim, 0 ai aw�aLi v.ccaCi'� o_= E 6i t C d + 0 C1 A L > S. c c w to I'- E L N CO O.N . N C N !Z W QJ O Ql L:y A;y LC L? 0 L wi CL Lad+ O,"� 3 "� eQ E...>�N'G1,m N Rl.;'M c w ej w'M - ILNI C A 03 C.L.O t0„C l a w ttn C _ > E m LE -zaat a= to,u M �l N t0 O N 4) N O ^ C > C CL .II V L C >` > o >.3.o a o;c� cu y . O'w. G1 J1 d CA (f'Q na p MaaOp �.'01 d C O C U O C LL13 , � Ow dD cc 1 ' b�: 3Gm O d a � t fey�auaupO�j' P G LU o Y! to LLJ G c3t gCC GAp uatAe�j >aA�/45aA6}y n_ F Q! co �• `.ba L w u' w d. .?• A L N i R o C! a O to a cLm mh w mp om lu u Ul •� �:P. tLti t0 ? S. 0...�. iW O .O S . al s»L :O L to L e+ Q• R w t.7 u 10 L al la atO. OG� - $atd N �C ti �L'Q ` 1.. V�' C G v C a O L. L N u. t»�4 W:-- L d e+ar.:0 O • S. O. toCL S•L. 'C a`.+"� was ® g' Ga u ar it td b �.0 4y a. ty� a fa .0 CD ^� f0 : ; ` W0- roNdG.°° 4 to 6 t.'fl L.. � r ' 0X � G� � tar0 + 0 Ga, sL 0 " G ) o O " r mvE � QS ty ; {4. .+ = C1�b a7 at Gr � 6 C. r eve N Ow O % !�ea.C S. ro ro O C O. N N ro , !�w O. m 5 E U C.a+.L. U R C W U C7= O O G"'N'� ri 6 W 0)S A S .N ro y 61 S a �. L ca m« ^ E h cro ro ti d ' y to y.ro+ C G.O ° O.L.+ COAL NI`ero Ca.si+•.�..Z'C.�s c �.i e... v 3 i u:yM T« d Lam`:' ° �taroiic';co D.� w w 61 y61 mC« L, L m roa.0 a1 � a ua) 3 O roNc.CMyC . O N tlJ .0 6L..w.r C7 > N C Q C.p Q1 � C N w,.� �.y y .._ Vit }^�—•_� y.0!�°.,L E'�7.;;.p.� '37 L 0Li4•� Vt' .y...w y until m N O. GL. 4' C L O y.v O O R Y C O � m 9� .m..�.� 45 `L —.. 43 O %. y O 8 w t S L ro w tt7.^.-C y,: L.,C o !" O N w. G jC07 y S. O m~ > N+�"'. >`..' N Q�. .�..C m O i0 w .n •�... c N.>'ro at .-�' - .ro« ayi +� rym' .pOUel fwt.10 w4a)+i ¢aE OLn q NQ mqqGSi . �OL aE inc °v cm _ a— C vUd� G� , C «N C -r C 0) y E , O 9 - w j' ro H.'td'.`R m�8,. O>>+N U.O ,g, •a c y ry N« cu >"' tPyE `" ro3 Gma� w .� u°"�,«, N.+ �'`_ ro ,d ° E � m � � me N mw.�1a, "N 0. 3 i. � Groi ie G roL7LaH« ��+::'USn CyW. L�Cm � gCjaC4, •;m �>° �V o d C > Wpm 1� �sy. 0, +�� � ro a, O L s TT',^ O m L U (���C IA E w ,c .�r L c c�CL L�.t�' E C e L L."G Q'O- v a m L C �O O O L. .+ O.m'%.0 t>'4_L C C C.00 .1.fq . ' O o 0 w UmeoM9� nam�� WN (� orom3turo 1-' E'ctu,Q ty � L F C. S Q � 99 W i9 a � 'y�aw.i...m. ■1�.7R�9�lURRR d5A®maewnnw . LU uj ron ao ss. e a .Ay,oupy�oa d 9 c S ui z U.; cc a o ai . . d. ®W W H -.ic, C N. J GC O n e0 E —3111. cc emy,useey 1 a w ( c •eny USAIIH T tl � Y•1 mCD L6 _ N m y y N f6�+� �._._ Q1 Q _s ,Q w Q,•,,N•. N L.. G N oCL L y m y w > 41y.- 6Ciz S. G: G; m UtnC N r mul cc COO �. N w sA. 0w-rs�� Q « �, 05 -pe N x al � a s 03 V � C� `c+ O A C. w �1 C ski to J o+ 9 C t® N s G O Ol S9 0-0 O `/ a0.c Q 6i w C.$1_0 b C 0! fn S. O N C 3 N6lCC.� Cis.tO :. C7LOn m .� � C9 a e_� Q� 41L�`�7 Q.�C,_• (� Q �...�:Y Nee d a Y, IM O. ._ B. C 'Q .G�:'y +'C+ A � s to x x�.' e,Q C7 N !p Q e, w C d Cl A•s t0 $ Q e ! .� St( At tR i, . to'a w e •__A w a d L, c m O ©, O C G1 N N I@'� C m .N O C.0 C L W ° L O l7 C y$�m f` C ° d� oa m v 1 . m"° m aLi�.v : =yO (M 43 L. In N Al k CD,O Mmm N0- 0 ONN VNII f m'="N p,.m G G m"','; mt N om v � � v 3 — a«sr� vv p...G.- CLj.C 0�2 6I 6Ti Q Q1'C 3 n U «.G ?T D " aEi r �'y�+co'� Z@a'� >.sC t N « �XX E 'A .' m y m 1. 3 j o'er �N 3�Mp Na W w y 'J,.. R R@ ✓" .D 07 X "3 m m m�: U 5;r , rt7:m O CL't3'm L w- .- 0 - O W tou �wa'«" 0. o � NG1OAgLa SI- W Gyms v .Ct� m�"GG m C �.yG w O1.G4 'GLL t I,,--G O o 'O ate ' ° C ?t.y v emu' .+ cOi }?��. O ?. «+ .R C «r al."jp w a+ .O Z:.`r COj d.CY1 �I mm «A sm My' .R._'II E:N off+•, Go �„0),sm. o:l.y1 L =tea • rC6 Co.-myarc; G« C;� maGi ..aLOJ �vroOi.�aCccCOL-.'Tti�O°LGGqq..' row•smOymm!+ «y0Ns mN R n M LR � ,,r y«a0r°Nmmn7, .m tn a� � a ; L�E- 08 �omO �. - v G v ro N B1 m'— ° G C OJ 01 WmG s 91 y> s a E.G W. yS n OO . G1-1 m MO p O MOM z C y L L'UDCe CC r L C LC m m O.O m m m m I(m ; +LNCCvGit+ N. ar O7 V N N's N' N.E N Ql y— L us ° 6 8� .: ®. LL'aC cQI-V .'�.c.0 i LU rA r, - J®; — J L+ V 00 ,. $25UNVA '^ -�� "CC '® ji ��Q7 ,. LD - a L J`d'.N O O tU e'`�9 « to w�,' EEa� a Q E.5.•� L^^• L C G.71 N a+ a N L.OL7 >.Iy th C p � XC�Y�j�% aV. �.k E mx �, �� p 1 .L 2 MLa NNEMGE- t1N U) J r M ... .� • •: r • 7 c. oN .0 U"OCNfJ 36.'oa--ra+ 1 U'LEcy"N�� c -OyRatobo t' to �.N Q. t!! U p to N-O C M,w rd �.y� G tU to•C cc 2 cn(n r ' .0 C M.m.>w O C C_ ii C•t^ a..: G yi L L 1'x IJi� • • • ' f� •L Q tRj L L tail«'D a•Q1 a >ca lC E•L 'u •pP E L `° �r-d 'a to mB o t) R > G L E Qa Rw U G c s d CI.Q yC` O O C syi-- N O tv ? V OxttlNN � eoaea.Cea+ >�:f�C CD UOW UtJtooCcuw U2, :EwLU'Uin r y A y dO + o c•=sWjONC C L. PR E to Lm V'C F L3.0 y R 4 :7 �. �N E 01 ,S C N .4 a �- b..,, Cs« E v.RM > R u N� C u i a >: C ,�o...H COI i1•' � 9i: R `Gl�o y N p��. C C X LCO �« Oy a>iw0z 'A : U >+L C +� O > N Z W m~ L.� u U.=0 4; = 3 m C;n,a n' r p t5 3 � > tu -0c �eLiic�°� ° R is > a o - 1 �,ul Ofj ta7w V w a tn'e L yL, M CL dF � a ] L ri r Al NHNCH-a'C7 � � � U.rm � C , qCi C N m Cya Ew�y C A C b R Gt W B1 Cfl J AL i L ,'•!y H c C " a R RJR.u0 Q).% M®1�..Q A L i C Q�1 1., 0 t�7 ���ep j Ri U tyt Rutoaa. ae ' cs: crcu_ �+r U C9'O 7�•_ N �}_ W C W O Qytn 41 E mu d o 4 m C Q � 3w voi aatyU � m c 4<N C ttj o ? ^C G E N CM''O C 4ro1 O i O C CL'a C V) f9 N O N N CL= ro:.V C7. L. , 4 a o Q�p O c L to _ w U.0, 4l 0.Q«a a MZ tr 0LL Gx 0 R� L V0.1 p 0 V LU N C C O ro C at L N �' a }. d N 5.. N w.,C 'J O N 47 41 O m C•a 41•a I m O " 41.0 W O C c 0 N A N,f, O O+. m i4! O U L.'a N L to OJ= 7.>.0— c p G I Y N N_ r 4. 4! L�.e c L 7.4! CL M a+ M M L^ f g ta.o L s 3. C Y .+ _ ro c•- t6 t4 - ro t>�. c N N4. 3o c .O+ 06L1 V L a+ L O d1 0 U 1�0 N S 41 = v.. a 0. 4I...�. 61 = 4J C C > C LN 41 O Z+K C {y VI L« 0 >$ 0 t N O « 0~ C I O 16 >.. cv 4J'�Q L Z 41 pro LO EL U.0 CC Lp yO .GOCCQC. yLCI, cU i�..LQ�N. .E L.U �.. U .a'4S 0 �' .02 E C 8 tn- M ? c .' U tuF" d.Cr >�m� n� pU ry $Y 4t %-.CR�� �A.'C+ L•�w6cij ygC'GNwC:+ ' G colo j � w > LII— mg dc � �— = co=,a >.cU 6 °'+Nw 61 C= O h` O !0 G! tt O! 0 4J.r L lu L,.0 O t0 o a•41 .e V to= 0 O.0,� �. If O L'. �p L >�• iC 1't c w�. E w .c a ,L. to teD 6i 01 0— u X.0•-'ei N 3 a• O M CL L. •= O r U C N..47.0 as 4i L,r S 6+1,v M 4! 0 c aN 4pl `j 4t � d (- . 01- 0Im �CCf 4'� CLOLC3 L.0 }'••C.M'0 IC O V'C O•A N.0 („� L r:.y C of> O S.0 C d! 4►w41 S Cl M 'a �> m� a C•� L7 >. a,cm ° s 1, N �N0coAai °, .ICU, ro N ,Z.. - O. N C ro +•7 •.0 7.- 7 1. C 4i tl1 $M N as iQ o - ' 6 a top LM ms c C R S d�,B E .+ +� C t! g a m:� �L 61 d a, d (�w 7 �. N N y M.' fl�•+ f,. C C.i C opf� L �u0 A0LL-00 NMQ B` RI CN.... � 1. v..'t1.> H .0 — Ot.U:.+ N�'a,A W .r d N 0 C' O'O.C U�.+ X Q� ro L 0 .r 0�� C. O L C� N«+ �•`�67 � d.c U L W E N.SJC � OR > a? 47G .0 W. mvl"CC3 C +.. �j`CcOOLCSY"NC uwl U� 47 :g�, .R 47 0 U:� CLy.s •0, O �rn C U m�MOM Oi+�.++ w g 8 Q7+, V L'm ci9 L. U Q a.1 r, ff. N 41 a l R L R «.0 K w IR C g.0... M L LIq... my a�� Ly p._ u » L y� �+ C o 41 ro -d C) LM 0•t 4i 6. ro N •U U L S.w'�� C'lII ��^ Qy :N"a... O.d O.:u C 41 - 4� of ti N.� O v y O CQt�' N'O L 0 mC.- �p,_ 41 L 7 p '41 N U L,.'''•' E y C 47 a...= L.'a Iq w C U'. r^ ,A C It N U�..0 3 N "'' >.x Q7 L ..M Logo o NL 0. ro uO wpOroL u4j3o ..8L w a� � �...�m a Lame (,�s6r• co L.v. " y L. L v 47 0, L W ��..a 87 a- U Ql. 'O �`E O M ccy� CCC 00 tM412S. CO OM S UM c wCCCc•...47 IS0.9 1 y 'm C M c1— N m 0 ++sQ.0 6J `°a �' o-" q p1y �•C O N p V6L QyL. u �Oi.LC!. y 1B V C e� y ou0.4 �_.ffidC1y� �'. NCu1tl`w L ea;� w CL�.ai.0 Q r L- @ O.'�� C C i0 N t8 ® c m 1..,�It :� 'a9 C. u! �..vVi y. g _ 4t o LL 0 3y � > ORf O 04t � 5. � fJR ?W.0 L cd :o w O= C M > '•OM�M V1L >.L Lw+ to ! O `3 C d .C64) t® U SS y C U 4i ro as N O 4i 4J L L iLi s I s kC« x � 4) ,, , 'aNL ty 6.L > � L s, arrd c 1yft4@sari ..j_ e_,,a w o h- a wv a ° s.r+ a m to cc> m E to . z OJ tn M.0 C1 7m0 CwyCm3 yss :•Mtn vt E3R O'm L.a CL>.7 w 41 E C.� c coad � O « E y,o'� cro � Cy C C N d CL LF T� S a O C,.d� L. M = N t � y- 0.- C O C 3' d•-. O E.G'a « C N:IN m > ' a O O C m is 4? ,63r 7 E L •�. Vf. o qu `�w'CLSgi3.+'C+ mlv@� O7yy. C«� p,C� YSUOO E o y C v7, C a y«+ t7 N y L L O U N L >."� V L 7 N 07 p y�.:.'Y a tO.E L t. c a O C�� 7.TJ...L 8 O.L._ ct as N.•- C O O N A .:M L U 41 t w tU - 4ul 1 EQ.'y - O (am p C..N � C.(.N.:m O~ a v C ycx UE N W yC.0 6m (Dm $ W Gaff N_ 'C CI Q1mNtn aiLi+�aL � N ? N y.ro N tan d p fJ ty « O A m >41 m r« O a).- G7 a 6i..:�+ tv0 O E-y y 5 S. d y E >. c u E c m 6 d'n u "m �x 9 C E E O A d. 7 3 O Q.C. o Z 9 m C.,�@ N to u u a'm F w m CS..„ a:C `� a Ct ct w $ M,M (9 m N O'Q a QJ tn 47'q'.m di m m :>.a W, N W W .V 3. C.~ .CM._ OD C0:.m t tit:L fJ A N C.� fA @ m.0.9?� S. m 0 a':$ C�..0 O QIa K_. 19 L�.L�. aQ t4.;3 r.O � 41 Nq Gco Nub m2 U.OJl. �« � NC� uLn � oai,lt'� ) ap w a) " N6N' C.cM U > 67 ®,•+ � (o CO. NOQ.Cm3ty 3. ce E Z7 p tC to+O U.. C >a 0) C.U m si C u'm = C. to w m F,t. ,1.� op 'Ld IP' iT o7 iNQcd C.a. EO.tm �J.m9C _� �. O'09:m r�MA >. > p w c tt �v w � E3A� L..� aa� ca� met s E N ara m y,� «m.. ,—!t •y 61 `C °3«�-�C !G aN >pC°C�3�. . p a a;« � m6 = AO 1 7E wAf.yv E- d p0.4 , 9 s > "' y.. E m .. m041erg p.. u C y O . c u � 3a tn � m �ety mom a_yr �sod > ` 3 d � Qf�} ''d LL O«Fsm»F,, '� el •tn c- �v Ltd" ID 'A OO y in3 • "� CNw ;—` «.It7�► t. 0 Ctsf Y ' R �O �+ _ Fy"'.m � C �� us q� m mmtt y •�� A y4 $sI � C: QG7y,� C iL m N N •m:m ut L 6a O '�r m �a+ C > C,',N>'. O V m C'.O O 0 m O C.w of t� m L L. ¢a w. qx YL•� O m�IS5 � 3 c7. tti� cao•udUOt c �.. � aLi aein � E w ¢i wO;O p wN t �O. e�o mC ems+. U) ute .N a y' C to cu O'e NR�O' � oj %. R mid ta R Z7 C 0 m r+ a: i0 Cam?. = V~ V N C. r R 00 R lima mw$ (p s. d R OJ e N 4) C.9 C ri a+ fl� � : C m LO ate taC S t ©1 ux 0 W ttl vC�Cyy .CA � 47 ,+Gar ;SCE UP to I to u^Wy L� � � C ta.7 RiyCO. dA L. v a C' 7 toCL ® Nk— W di 0 'MC> LC. �:3 Ct jmN, aC O `� � �� t �•R p,.a O v O m �— _ C0. N� �� v C R q � N )1 C.•t > gow;w ` 9Cm off! .. 0 t xr� 0 i r.. i.-; ^� ail r4 uf 8 L. fV'cnC1 NN 1+ M W Z C L t D i 0 M N w O N H L d aLMln� (a WhMn S ro. Z G= N N.�-Ipp �,.. 0 C N L ul (n r L m fD dLU .� aj Z'c 61 J R V u U PY M rr trtI9P 17 9®N.BI n IOb GN nl y O�OS NOl QlY�f!CY-14r t! PCL. U MwMC ®r1N CS t0 Q1 $ -N'N tom! R1 N � a• • � V 33 QjCD C ro o 72 6— E o d U m co CA Za CD �! #' ® •b Gi (gy�pp• • pyp _i M.e. 0! r 1 0,$ip. Cs b U e icy uj Or r Ca 6 @ _ a w._ qR i C ate.m . C i�=^ so. wM tn 7 fA A �co ro C� cdm CL tom ° O C .�N.saCi �os+ �LCro � 0,, m u« 3++ a i N N L @a L QY. $ m p•L�.« G.O W•a.� EN 2 N G. ciamO.oE5. m rA «._. ul y m n E 41 m N m uj Lq �RvmnmmQAY3 ; y - W W— ta L U C 01 7 m L J m O`•.,m A N ull m R C C L. V'p ss a '.S„ W ju;� w C.� m N is O L:E 9 � ca o bumf �U. L mS. d _ o a as rno N a CL aCi ci c � e'E e o a Um m S. m awe o f a am 'tj o u m E«' c CAC3.CCiN N'o L 0�> NUl,CA �•'Z� •' + A _«tn « :� L d - rn� eccNs �. aL = Cw M ELmUM L- = c my as al y y a a. '� O. U y 51"O 61 m- J2 :�M V y L Cl N U.... N y C m y O E y.�,-C- m _ro.c a mom_ to s«� y aC =e.g 3 N N e� J c a y.-'� 404u ~ oV-Wy� a, Cyr. ;� C � .: .�,L�_ •L O C7 .41 Volor« E, 153 p.7 61 C N Bl C m a) d L O ' m 8.p C y P L G7 6 l�0 p ; L y�+ d tS O2 °.� Ly Lmy 0 a) Di� mCI y9Ac0 O C o >:+ aCa U. (/] a+• « FO C• lb L•,61 Q d m 01 f0 1g 40 N y'.� 6i�m.v m 3 m a O s. w y AZ •O N w rp,« 0 A y t 3 « vw0rmd ' 4; r� 3 L �Q ®"'Zl�gp.sms V p n V C i+ ?•6t ., l�Z gj C a . oc® 3 L -j EO> p� mL= •�CCd L Q to y«a�.�s•v CL mp 0 =W-A 2 2•��� •mo d a >mS y•_ e 0 di m:N 4a Et � U➢ a« A 1L9 L O. U A'." a IJt y9:'®... a� .2 CJ 3 V..� _ ayiw.0 0X ® �vi� CyJaoieLi�„ a.a"i ®��:w m sa« ® .tl1O mT;V p10.0 V w ® L tna Cga ro Fl s a ,.��,: r� t�= ��� -YEIB ��� ���oo Imo ei� .., �� � >> `.,sue' .::-: ..; ,. .-. < =_ - ,- '- '' z� �'d � �/ -..r�..� i A Ly` 7 S "i R �� ✓"f . � ,_ u _ _ ,_ n _ -. _ _ ,. z 3 c w _ N:w. o LL >" E Z Z Q ._ to w :W W W W}} Lu Lu 11 LU al ALL ? ?a 2 op-z d w Fa..- U tW- LWA v¢ a we L• Oa y c7 (a7 cd7 LU fr } ALSSHOW sMn IRA Z 9 i_ d g at, Q 300 �.. S LU w S Z SO cts - �'�•.• �' � � ®� ffi <' ,apt F W a CL Er..._ m E ° a p t9 .0 M rsa - C' two Z" or- gai R �Z yagn a c N a 6 C y,c O lu«i, 7 0 1.0 « w a >-C o`•e w aei L caLO -C �.'3 t.7. Q �+ O a m C a C ,) m a-« O O ceEsEc�10= > ac �o N se a N - M.-, >. fr E L AI s « b f0 e:C L fA a m:..• a b a.o a ui to M.0 E E E _ImCJ Hai > y ts> a 7' N S. O.w T,r L.�.N g..� N t]..1- Ln O & :' a::A. m a T GD 7 : y O _7•.ii N'O. R �`N a CL N - ~ O 0 a c a— E. >. a ica41 a e a c w :3 ` O• fn _ a a :+ fn ° 3' •- a..L 7 e:. %i N 67— a C > m « O C U a ° A L W._ GC wa= Tc x a �m A ° "O a Vl y« 3 a A! f. a $ a O N fO.�C a y ,(a N G7 a 3 C G d °�p a ,'•a, > Yi N ; °e°+ °«' vUi> y U N UG G E« m a,v O lC tto 7� N A N'O G ce v a E ao c N aS. � 3fgeL ° 0r � Lotto ,, ay a+:S � ass. a "' � e0 ° 'La RLg a� .roo+ F moo. W �Y 8fd svU C pUroJ R GA Q Q.tLi F-y? u h'L �a�+.:C a-ZO L t; .00 L e N a L.. �..O •a,� g C,.:. a O a a •L O. O1...Y 'U d�..-O G ••.. X N a ` R1 +...,. l.! in O ul •• � e49 � +aN a � cu « « - •>�C �. •_. a. a Q' •.1« O Qd O C •7 C aej 7 ,.. .J«i s E G« ��L > 'R ca•eo fi `�" a 0 w a ocLa «La m s La g a > a a, Q«te � � 31 �ct9 g > sa s a s a tC a ° VawN LO u e NQ9 j ta to 0 ffi C-' W C t mto 8. U a ui (n cc .a t L N w- — .41-0 to to �� tvMta' tY'� OA yV- A 2 aNv gbdoIIE's"GCP, sw�,« iD to o .M O u t�0 L t0 6! L > p'° •O tD LL.u• E V U« ES O.S. C 0)V/ L Q1y T L A 4S lII U ,s,� C L V CT O m ar •� ti a. tY+ tv u O w 0 E tA— i q NEN CI G'CtL9;aOq N CpU.e,p^'+r q C y d,`—o :fhE ai` ill ie. I•- D Q t7 C~ v°rr E E t 7 E.O y T �+ l.s...fi.0 u. „•i s E,m G ,A • 6i JA :� i U.Oc-Ors m �o ?�p o _ aUi w Ua 10+°.,Id~.�Q.�97 H° >LCLt at L ^ ."-°<,•:- Eco a" o>_ 1 ° oe ¢=o to T• O ' " .tu W�tv UN t/7 va tapes ., d« A�4) A J. m c as E° w �L N v L�a m > oq:'Q, > A c."m� a>i n-c? s p "O C!�`# A 5 o,L� N�+ > E 'er ¢ a:,d« O .N D •E C N ai 6 a $ I_ d > ,6�0 >T O y_�W tO fA L e_¢ m._ q,c� y A.N E U �.�a� �, ++ L E N E q-w ° ? } L L Q1$ 7+�:+ 0y! tti y 0..�� 7 '8 L V N C.� �1��, M° NO O _ ¢++tutt, cu N t:..cc_ > mA—wm ?c° 'tO . Cc M3CLe m to I y y n+C N� g °G �a.!nte� Ohs L v d o:+ �LL r'w to C L ro &_3 N`(,-V mpb 1rt Cep a tVU « ' C C t'dC« C O -yy IL N°L..ai.�C > U •: L to r.•0�J d @ Cl O �,a O V�� O L�S V N.a• N'G L i > 19 U:U W to O 9,p.Q N.Q V !�.�' u�' tlt m ro C'E di i�• �.".a°e. 6,t l- • I— Vah R y. EAI$ R L .� LU O yo N 61 M C74. U L ,EC C0.y > N U yeo ; p° « O G21Q L 1= 0 to Em E w o a wL. 14 ul rEF ca yo �..t0 O O C C S. C •p N w C QJ U) Aft Ed•^+ d N[� Mfp N C a�J 'Q q C m >E a C cn d w N d N 3 V U G 0.0. N -C j:0 V ci LO E.C2 Off.m w aCi p'v�to 3 L1 i2 P. E¢ ®�m w 0'w _O R A U tr. .3 E 7 to N"L tJ ._W m h W n r n $ A t=MU Z Y s-6Q-4 oy« 3pE�Y W ;! = U3 t�d �ep R� 3y'y t�it�0 > c,rz.C+w« a�� =JJ zo c'wac aLt rd � Ne � a�i:E � v oeN'3 c03 p «i•-.-..C Ol w w LEwN mai: de � U cm°n�iE0W0 yA:— y �da r E 7 N MU.. " CJ 7 d.T 4- La it U w N 3 y U 3. .0 00 Ul a saS. 0 °m Em m > y_w3m A a • w , q U •t L s N N N...G tr E U E N..�N E U U, t r°... O.ryC R , ¢t rL tn 13 u E uy m > tnw ° Ltu o a m e E'`d w°d v r`c ° w _ L3 vq.q:CGO:M rmL - p'_ C E M0 N 0 AL? �a E CLtn 0 co cm my!? CCAioYp L tn. e' ief La c c c c'a,N 3 M �� E .._ co >M U tU w-G O t0 mC NQ'tn C :m LO N.41 E- L U _C F. t1.L— S.� ° ® v Ot t-Z E C t�NO m > d O 0 C C•/' C L E—'L N..Qst L > 6 \ eO+ tF-.c tU..O C O'U ty'C 7 co y lr w p t0 �. C O O L,_ r C. % NS gLC..tn a6 :18l0a �.V •y=.O tu ifi 0 w ttl0 A q cn C L >C A�Cy`3tLW Ca— tnd Q � m 6.1 cM v sc �'m �z« rn � � ut c to U c� u�c m,U > co�� -t® + }� t-`3 O N O C C �. N q 0).. O g C Ol }(gam . -tto-1.p �.q 'i ¢:.� l0,0.0 m -- N 91 C 01 A 09 al O b'U 1 x.W d W d C1 M. Vf•C of-w a0, 0 �+ O U L. tl O,C fl'f A.0 G d C.0 6t N.d c N ct E�'ca,. ° cc«i �N ° a."' d L" N_ m s >'L TJ Ca°i aS. ws N �_v.L+ C«GmCC W."am —_ N ko..> O.'C•�+m E m O '�.. A - C f0 A,... y u U M O1 m « > 6t:N C Ul .aC 0 N 3•u U 0. S.. E, Li,« o"�N''CO to O ° C, .0 C. W�++ 7'� >.in �� W C as t«. io«�: ID+• :,.aC. O w�,O'c'0 r' 't7 O F:2 m'E W ay id .0 of ayJ gym w sm. aLiai > m E �>_ � � � N= rt E > ni «� W nJ N 0 C « O N c m w N— 'n m;: e w s— o Lo.c mO m o > w � A '� emu;. ° oE rL NL� ;�,gLn q: = i'�""m U- E U) C « ai O m c O 1 1 " C1. Cl C 'c ° aim p«m G. �� o^' .°c � Ern�«�saoi U. >> 0, da �. C t.. 0.01 al w i0 41:+p m »+rJ 4) = N L.-C'r L. OC a>7 41 m O C. O C C1 a:N U« m A O.�} N L N.: 0 L.0.r m O.:U in E N;. C'E 01«_C.�. C 0.aJ.,.L U L d'arO � C L E ro s E._ m 01U _ S. a� C M fJ Mo N S. U 0. . C— Im 3 I . CL C NC ai` p D O 4 0 z m m > p c 0) a = Cu u ra y •p m al 4).y.; C L,4. L• G 0 E.0 =.4+•a) c 0 N L O a7'd L. w`.O C (AE L.5 . M. Q .+ O fn 0.. « _ _ M 7.>. O .. G W ` L ' wCD pm E—co�L pp ` t > as — b, {{�� C AOL�1a ,t eo 96 w •tp0 � ♦~ / d s 1' amok �. W '. N G. -> ii'. �p G W e V ' W,N-i W egg �Hal q i 2 b V? viAlk U.a u cC« �. 3 u;;' L. s G C H 3: 1 .. $..: N Cl 7 = 9a i .f r S. S 4! cv, LUcn O SO r- O G N Cl �i a L I C! E CL uj us Ln N L d t N 104 N �+ f N y tGa W.. R ORl 'u1 :W ~ U.O C C N �R E w.a 4J L V C1y3 61G •C.+ N CR'fl : 61CC Z+=" c > oo�L sc« dW, � � cELR� 9 uEco a :> °m 0 c.o c 2 6 u U a c E s m GL G a� R H O1� p L �M Cl Ulei m in m3: ^�..w�c R u G9 cy L c 3m ym.O aCi '� N0.++ c Op ua,,z LD n,Mui yC (4 > m u Nam g1' L C 81C1� 8 G a C Qf� w Rb.� y1 a 10 9� O .0 L E �s +9 N 41 t0 67 m. 61 H +' ~ N..L.RC to ��.+r G f'w N G•U.y cu icy c n � m = i>'-!dcc u- ` Ccroswo' H Ego, 3t R 61 C L-.:._ C C1� L•_•_ > 9ME + 61 CC._ d Ow >' `� _C 61> p d•N-� E y v Cs i �� u y E C10 t0�7 Lq �=a�•C R O U L�ra1"r SRr L a' 9 BJ w y._. w T•C L N W. C C 6i 1 $N.�. 9 O.�1 G N G 61 UO._ d L E L Q! L GI R w > L L L 0 R ..! Al L.A3 d1 w0 .Gr• e$ O O i V H: d a1I M= 41^CIA 3 �w Gi9 LO VI 9 41 'L°b d C.Q'9 ri m V N O w..y R� O 9 i, C=�..L C1 9Ri 'a t�9 E 9 aRa.0 O'�� 61 10�,'� S'® aw6C UQ8LawwCU <C�1nH9 19,;A o ar•0d � d C apa uayN- ++ >. «+ :,.-, N r �d7'v L'a N.N R -0� C:S..0'D�a d U R R a.., N•- ilL i" O ° a ;p w< C +°.'. N E R y 0 L V L a w 0 3'.. :a C a a°+ t aL "0 p C O ~ N C N C'~ ~ 3«.0@ Q.•p' C O�:+ �N"'' N d.0 X L ... '0 N N.N >' w.T9 L o 5-O'VQ6i '« >L N'�#tJ M R. E yu p d a cnp L 4p,oCRLR UEc � a R aU. 07aa X N 0. -0 a« O ° ° Gi J $ E.yN QyRC apC �i.w v > o OaL: to z, � 0NW R l O L. zo Qa UL >' -0C3 L'O« a R _•N $ 0 �_ C m y R L c Nc o Ta a U L CCS. �R c i i. Cua 1 1. R R '0 a N M 7�. �p w'0 Q yl N -� a L✓ fA C N C d N L V:•�,D S. M C C 6 C T'� GLT y a+ O'er 0~�Cp.R Na°+.•y'N i0 0 p'y0df0.� 4NJ �'Q=" � 61Cw a•ti;ar' N .. S p� UN C to L U C.0 L N'0 G R: p 6i L. ayi.� 8.a'L7 O O i w ° S. « a 61 a° >� s.°+ G �= R'tea`° U.:= cU9 VI a'-RR. U CI > NNUa C _ Q' 7yis) � .0. 0 .+ NWR es OAN CCJ -0 .C > ° V r'Ap .y+ cn eRC a OA EU UC m�,ol:NEL S.MM S. � LEnR Coe :'t aliie U= E L N E a c � U - U R o 7 a Q N vS.0 a- r- R.0 3 y" O v*0 4) 'Q��L N.6•a L S.R a .a R�.N�� R�A 0 ~ 6R1 V. a R•- N:-... p W RE a3 NM0 pa3 z�E a"Q tnuE"3 Bc aEEQ JN«tA OR4. 0 a u O' -. e CD z N- 'D a. •fly Z Rr L ur a c«, >.o o e L•- o C E C� �'m o N R E'ao`a=1r- au... Nr C a�� aT� � �•�� L d �. L R4 L R. a N'wR`+tD C Q au V ", O •(U GN) i..•R )'.N., Qt"'•f-• R 0., C N y O.N u u C.- m � Z 1> °- CLN o•a c c d c c E r- M u10 C •O U ° i'_ uj R R R �. •O U a a s 'L.�-'� N p `+. R L, V d L Q. N 0o`OU = ym.Tco yam'E,� du' C � d.Opy, o m .+ N u: C.a �'�.. 7 N ?�N 3 a, U ° rn. 'O C L �,, N o as R�m j-o n v c N R a cw — N ai °'E cci o 3 ° ._ R L �tlf_ C«. L R ro.L c o 0 3 L `°C 'O E—ia L N ,a C a >A R R y - Cl C✓�' Q oo u to 3 M'U C -p L R-p a C. .N a E QS3 �;. C L 7 N O a 'p: a E + L U C u,.� a O C u O.y L. L. N R""' a a ;,� u .C•O a EL tm ..Ri fC9 m.a M O. d � -Np R p y a"'a �9. W N J:W N u iaR+rR� E O L. a OD . �� M a a O I L^ L R ca to a(A'a a s a 5: r- rb7O-• .aCL r - NC 61•N •�C' C 0!@O aC or: 3 ip w> 0a . L. E r0 AK r NyR N vp 0 > L a>CL V wm a zO a0 >O +p L .n E"O« a C'o m E c P m L a O? «� V' L a' f-.- a.L q ?Vr 'r ?►=u�`+.A N • • r CO V N r z W in - 3 ¢+ T w 09 - 90 r Q tun) w CE y� o<, z LLI cr v, w CA silk z s W a r. srw moa ..yCAe r Cm m m i7r.. Vx c ' CJ L U. L O 11 N N z �+,s. WW"CG W� � Wb30 3$$t In '—.s 61$.w C -ti �. X N .+� � 'i• s� 41�wwi.•A W W L� m In CW>lq C O . M>� y•raa C C 7 C U.. $ Ci aC) 0 �C In i owC cQg � w 'C �: u N tl U. IV + eyWa�nC � s �;t: nn'��t �e NawaIft 43 a7 'C � d� `ENO ® � CGzC. Wr-IA0C �» C0 ��� a a �a L w W t4 }. 47•$i. . tQi0°� W«ai to 2 -a, y yt s M U. to n C R t9 L id;'C tj a Qt 'fl•1V4 p lVgg, CJ 7.. ro.� C:� t7iq.r� .+ W0. H0. r h t¢ Z m ` n O r p t0 3 � 3 w in co Q _, e ck c ,�s,i•tr _ lj� T.. � ti cc a y . --d F cc n N r" Ota0++-0tRm L. ?� Olq v � AicO C:piO c LN i 1 cR.a' 0R34 a,S ,� o t LR" t6�°;; .+ 4. v -? ERoq c$ � � > o � � `�� do� Lro «M m e C« Otto y C a n L 'A R•. w w tiq« Q1.0 N, CL Fa C ptiS =4. L W N L L C Oi N `:7 �y.+• a C v w 0 10 C :5.._ 5 H.. to t9 M 61 •C N C C d _ a>•- C w S y.O.C a ti y�? R �w-.V�o C Z h u V CD ® u. '> di `.�."6 S y i�'^Mp'�;.� s y.'AT C`� G •ywj. cu s'.0 CI GD+r :t�+ m 67 Cl CD C 1L s 0 p.— cS. L N C }C!$,�•. ,.0 to + .a i N }1 tJ c7QON cs51R`) � 14Gi61 .7♦! pH tUlm V CiO• U co (A i 01itv L w i •aO.+ R � "i� LCa N,> w o j ,4c C CL L. 0r CL, C Cp �t� .... e. 45 oIICII R „ � y 'CQa7 C aR—• oiaRi � N 3 i C ;:-C—... p'•3'p iv m.t7 '' v N E �.Q.,. 3� L w � N R C L 0! M a R L Z9 A S. C L 3S Cho',—VU oNEy }` y,R o � ovn� L 'or c u'Rc � i oRc ' a c E� e.ta9► su. c y0- to tz EC to E•C � N« aid = iN •1? •vm �R �'.. 'Cs ; at •G«-" .+•- pp a� C.� y � �u yw..0 9i � -L. f!Y @oa.C C -R+dJ'�«` C CION C X,:�Cr R..L... 0 .8.'.�:. , .0 1, F^ w m d G Z w0 N qOy V RH >z m(D a s w � u. d w w w o orz H- a U .r , u CL m � N 1 (jU \'a sews•✓��♦ _ y...-... � tu _ 9nrtau+m CIAp i L O U, co ca cm to cor9Birb"� e: rJ r JA ur auaM AA. x. r �. s 47 2 LU 0 a r � -;r a I� � t� • . � N 11 a � LL ++- 5 d 1 l0 VI A. A'O O L-ua LY NQ LY.' y:� C GGG > dy«Ly dG.O a+ a L L t0 l9 `J d d O O•� d u G «Y vita aarw « �puE mL �— y ' y � ' a' o c a o Av w r—s4 G a N.p X aai �•... .G O'-• G .0 O t0 y « u G L` y`r.+ Q �.5" �, .G.-dr d W A d.Q O Sm L 61 O.a u 17.a y.B G y L y- 5 c0+ 6y O Ib` 6 CU L w.CL A« C A O « _ d G07. N V a Y C A. 'C $ O 1. ul5. .0 9 y g v' CJ 0!'p H y > y a a y,N 's W '7 C C Qf G L M 01 C L ,�y L L 0 O•� C a.C^ N N. R « y C1C dam,® u« « d L..L NN. M.e S' L CJ u ej w u! d O Q fy. n L '"y aLi 01. to fu0'�� C. � «N 0 V A L. > d, d m NO. CL GSC« � 1Ctu. sGs• CAA "' N � y r �•�V�.. ,o yd N Asa>'3 ...fG9 Aa.Q X C �Gd/ d tl1Irl'a••'« G � � �'�' L " L 6 a 7LLO 7 yIA l9 Lm U.9 d U$ C � Ou 9 toO3 4 OE ®L • « 6� � C �w (B • @. y dL L°Gh� CLIZ '.� u a i m u a). s Q•b ,ai m °y L C'-= A Q a a A t n O Ca-- u A•—..SUM —�a R In . so�,C ��OR3m.Qr.— Fs^ 9 wi]. r c 07 CL�.4+ +• �`� L �C^ Cgt 013 ai c L w GI 61 CL :C w� aL V tA L •+ -V d -� A C Ol U dtA - Qp tft d C .-.. i .to J' C C•:FIn l:3 �_f i1 y q Q d t/r Q1 cy. A. Ri V L.o. .rtL C` - L O• . tA tl a d;` CCLe. C1 C a. w O<"'y, t: L \y" V �. ;Oi - io L C7 L Co y 7 L trt V:.C y,•.. "". '� •Ct w L J.� .d > L� p...1�_ O °._v C C 4iroiro'rL'. 3 ,._. .+ C V « C. C c An L V u w L::d.� C q y " yO V w=ro 1--'N. "es.ta. ° , • a a ®. O ` 1 to 49 ea 1 i cu c� se as. fA V j2, F bra : C, pp® 13 v •�yam6H,y` CbSt Ci � � ,-pip R x �. G a 1„ CQ .E uj I fq 6&, IL a p a fir n ma;-� � a s E o i �- ✓ 1 o us enr�UVARH �7 r` •••�• N+'•^' I VI 1 1pp y>- tA 0 Vl�+:� A, I X,rV� � U.Q V dJ E tJ c. ul d N 6r U Cd y C In tD M z C V.Z O ,uOJd vU.0 w wM`�.,' V &. E 2 �s0 ,,�� C L.E`Gvu W Lq wl CG o roN' 7s o f y C1U�,� a ve r. N to t6 41 ��— ups ; ,rv. a � 3 �uti G � �� `� �L m 0:9,„ 0�elro>o cJyr�zt e U >I wi, 3 u' csyac °� � � � aav qm E � w C'y m t N 0 LLm I U' � 1- 0C-. 61 t •� U L O_. >.0 Q7 i.. to r6 L u t .. M f•` 47 '� E:Q m a G:may 5 3..` u co 0.2 a X •= 06 w w u ,� cvi�.�o�c� r dQ4cq�l�'� Qq+•Q ] �{ NQidEC` V Uc1'fw`�+ y 8A .+a149aot0 ° ® ti' CLO{/1ClO l m R O'l s a a � tnta ? qua m,p v aCE—*C4; .0 CR ra Ift ro C t0 S. y :: a to m mE m z ';0 >' sa@ u t3 _ C LL«O+,v. 4 O;g a'O W � � S1 m w.°m a m` CS A L CA,C"> .. u a m 43 • wme..i+,S to a 3` R °�: .0 a,iv„' O .r�°' 6l y`,,•'' ul I 'S7 to-C 47"p.C .^!b� ,C "'• W.«p s.cw y N i"'ayi'ur ,Y $ C G. 1p aC tC m.u R O J }C �+ R mCl.tnU E U � Qa v $.+ Cm I tom, c c..0 y R aC3 (L `^ �y�«' >4 cc �R m to >a c •C CD s, „ a Gt� m a � u d'� �'4U1 u 0 yn.0 CL m A C,'a V Pad u u °' N: � @m XG � dar n-19 ° &tii.rx to t9 L 3 O .i ii, 'Q W C'a y C Cin C i d m C a m♦� 01 «,L.0 a:7 .� i.:tri N I C U 4m7 war ' 4Ci Wm.0 cw11 tP..0 •41 r+�U,�.`O Q..O R a tlz- v . -C 4aa R a) tr,e+ th V W'xa ,`+.0 C<C 0= u CwR a C m i 0 17 tft tj 1G C 0.� to tli EC•v aL 1TlN«kai r �a uia•a U3 Oaa ,•y ro sro« L}*. aE > C to a :wtsr +Ei 9 to.=X, ° mR M 6 RR a. maL RQgn sR. O t 4-0 CL Y ?a:'t}ttt C, a ''• Q wi' C a 'ram C 4 to ,C �i m CJ �! „y G M o C > :f i --44 to t° a`a �.= d � m m C Squ m « wt1 L N a a S. a ,,,�"C1 a O C R � tx2 !$ ,mu �. �C0=C C oai w,C tJ a C%a to A:m tCs s°1d w W"Q 3 � 0 m ` > R s* m aft .� sit tY .Y O Q - U t1ia a R m :a Q. °' L R•� C @. R C *A a uw�Cu.Rz c fd Iz, 1 _ 1 I� Y, IE rr 1S '11 yvoi•;�e`�«~ E �w ' U > j; O O a-� m - �o oL L. E y ot� c` 'p.O L w•X ul LL. •N: m .m m° m C L m R GL A m t}S! ,X 7 �.. 7 Q m� 4° m9t ¢.. a-pmE Em u .OLm _ m E Y L m S E C" m C p N y«+ C m t m Z E-E y C N. Ci. 'Q N .-c m a N U Y�y O m m N O L..61>N.G aw.� 'Q •E U. n'�.'.L W C W V.$9 Qt to m "e a O A O.0 Ln N O:E m m tC, m y' N A m. O to a�i c ut H S.> N a �_ L Q. m m N L -p y ami m a L m 0 CL m m m Q j A y G A m mS gm 7 ;; y m i OCN �aLB d'tV tML to L. � �� C 'N t0cu L N. Y O Qv L'C 7 S.c'/'1 m U m 9 �- N ai C::I" O.IL L C.-n m :N C t'� •�.'-C >... y 4mi-B y,A C � N E Am RCp L.Gmd �m.m« Or cpdrG E � C w7 �w Q.«� —m ca �'c vi _M L N c �� E"�cam:«mom c n O A C Nr m• m•i«0 E m 47. L.'na 'r'C.+ m m m-C m Y 4mMw. L C_O d O.. rEy�0) Cm> mL 11 �:OCG•' Im LELm 09'�� 1stm mE •i7f y. N _G'X r ^J. m a. St 6t C+U N E C Ccu c " a>i. '� a S. o' L c'Sv '�8 9 o G S rt a a,}m..ram o;E U U Q iit-8 CC to I L M 9,,�-G E m«R c.i o A C� O.'C9"e m m N m U."G VJ G N 0o. b. a+.O+ ia� >,L : , O C .+ m N V).- E « iJf C u rz (D C1 C m "' a tn— Gf� CD f oEc�- cot« eG� N« e � niEUE.? � �p.E ec.3 � E �,eX pRom._ '-:gym o"- m m` uCmNom cmi.,® Cmo ocu m y p17 d 6 ED-M D0,�rO m c'y�'p� C m Nsa� 3 6 V C - N > m.Vj Liy A. ~ '.E'C.,CN mwv- Cy.;G �y:6'1 O:�..II) �r CeL+ .... 0Lmr0L0 m .4 aCtaawmOmmm L r, mm 3'C >A «w v a R eG� mr cn y=N— N L E Ar G a� dui m Eu _Bi � um,,_'C7 m•• WC. m eG� 4. 'a 7\ Ga A.a:+ m eMw M .$ m m :+..�tD .aC O a �� .O m N a : m a.J'= X in S.G._r.-^ m w s. g -Cr ® E m— ��c (n m .0 mm m m .a a m— y m m 'Ti G u Y sa a+ L.'e1 m fl.H- ..a m c 'II 3' R.-o to C= m V'G� s� as a N.�u 01:' tam m� Eaa E cum �:14'0M _ mNr� m U= +°w7� y. m X X m C� O N > ta E C ' a! r N e.+ -: N. W 9`� W y Y ++ 43,�. C A r—:s s ®fa st:— W ,y« ..ea 'a 'O'O s i, °'' ayi u .Od ci a Cd $ �,psL $XvtAOGCsaai O 1. 2 C a::7 y. G _ J_m r p m O7 m. -0 y`�7 N 3.G.a A_ m C �._ ltt-.L m m f�,11 A. m'a.Ow G a,G�; GeD as-ty 'J'O�N Me C UI r m C m t = O'm 3 Ol �.'6 r m m U a L C L' y i0 jjL �.l Gt�.� 'o m 01 m'C E C_ O X. N a y X gam} M m m O N fmj m 'C K C9 y " L,= 61 C >= _n m 41 t9 O7 y.G-0 N L m y ,Q O aj ®.C.y m Ua' tO L:G.L m'GN S L•�.m c 0.0 X� a:.At � � Q ��OL Q. C V L C+�- UNW N' y. Rm NNm.G_W.CmC.a a :��,.. G W S. y S. ,G, C U y a L L m E tR. E Qt � y a �._ N an d ..a G._ e Gay° M; Ncin'v .� p , m m �. td..0O cC-a��O �C 7;« M t4tC .®wSS Yd3. N ro C 1: « �y } t�l N W.C�•'Q a.:N a I CL .O++C'„>�,,as W.-C.�`� S..N G _'$.c CLi" G:� C.— E (U O c7.U C O a U'II G m L.m G Z. U O Cl:�+ Ip N N CL i_ L LL y 0 6.O+ R A C.+ to 01 N G> U m >- U C N C to C:a ° N m 07•v >• N U N a A W ✓:N .4 X 3 Lil y W,a f9 a N N E L O �;a •p G'G•IL..N >.N W C ?r.m"L y C:C i9i 3 3.C y a j L C�+ L m N Ip C a_ Ul Zf E 07 "CL LU m > a m a++ W �,>._ W L O a p C N r CL G > CL: a':+ W a w>"O II _ E a a m o a G 'a m I ui ««. C' co ami A m'� m 3 G r u°s a 1" N: 7 �- u01 .N+ C A W.n U V C V QwCi d« C y y k;.Q~ C N. cn C N Z m G E 'p .Q ro W 1 = m aCE�a+ L p1.+«+ � l9 C- N M 'OO aG CW U Q. a'� m CS R L;;, m }'m G W� QO a O w ' a GQ -payic«, E EEC E:- a ci im tN mc3 m, 3 W e a S.o W- ofa, o:c a'a cUe oN M 3:uw L a > �S. Z! ta y Oa G� E �> mO� C Ul 3. G u c��'='N E ro ds rn.es of ar° V E U: $ tm E N cnMz� sst3�'N .Nya O C.aaicC m .0 U y m p W a . R I- 3u. yc'CUC.nIIGQ.+ a Jew • .�. ,Q N OE L a 0 a ,w a m C I C 0) A N to.� I O a N N >. v U C U as G w a.� C ,¢ �. •L+ Ri.v m C.�'..d tU0°« >"L. — b' Q Q .Q G 7 Q-c_ m E a ui E E a«.o a'O O.o.t a s 3 C. E 1; E V• E'L 0' C 3 •C:. C Cr r'"Q ai a W > a'II t, O p' `+ N •. �o Lr:�,r —o�E 'ac `mwELr- ��c'' c N _c Eac+ EE cm.cme aNmE CLc-.cW NE0C cu am •- - caiu CLwtC. W m N�'� >.E W. C �'u E X w, rt W H VL�i O Q.0 ¢�C L. L _ Ei T-2 'Q u.M W'X w cvic� a:cs � 9coE,e. ° La's: W"'s.'g+ 3 a° aim mN� W mE aO L C' a .� � L�.� > Has AFL3u I!"> 'C.+� > EN S. E w, g E u, a m N W O m a .�.w.C'A.. p U► W L C a `,« C a an O+a 'US aO 'O L D1 O U W 'O m m N �WQ msGypUa._.+ 'QWv.M. CrOflC G3� _ L wWM W WO r'..6 ro tS1 a' N'C !' C w.. W N C a •� "Q Ig a C Itt 'p•_ L p7 m: N 3 a w'�M: W L C w �Cp a �' L L m M N TJ L.G w" O,Q S C'>pp .. U w td:;yr N•-O..3.C W W y1 g W 3 W,y U C war -a TO U. i iSZ 0. aS GL GiL U Q 3 O as N O W 0 � W ' cY�w B. maa+ zz m_ « AW01 a'`lS.W� «� �gac > OOcMfA W L L 3 a N.Q w a O?A L'. W, Yf! W•_V L_ a 'y W L..'� =.*- ®1 C L U w C br... yy a er•Q S 4' _ W CL �' ._ in.0 a s:W U S. Q•y,' ,� N S O. W,�,w C wr Q! a._ I E •p N N S g 09W .ESL CEMwmm �" � ® m Cw Co6S.,., aea. 'O1 .NyCfSM'aCI...O C.O C 3 O U C« C C wW, -p.0 Q1 A�:.'Q w j AD C E a E E'a'!'o'8 m 3'_CL s L vt w V.a:i N a_: a W E > W N Lw3Q«,E W �Igg > � g � 3II'cu_ NC�L >>._ a�"W._,paUl ® � H W Cfl'g _ CY_ > Q,e IGv Ew c°�a am, Em ammo N« Q C Q3 cv" 0 cm e=. W 09�' a.� Z,in C S =p'CLGI C C ` C6.WC �..�w L� Q Q w O w • 0 y j ~m •i C CL in OJ tr h y C C ems:«r OC EEE 3ti 3a rn d d`.I .Ftf o.w uj y .-vc .. N' av Mmm rM C uj Ln �. (D im N "EEC, w Im C � � ,1 i g o ? >f « C+ W Z. R R... '1> L. _J O �; �' +o d mLn hF- a ry "v'cn t v°1i > y c cec QtE ° ,te Ne p1 bc CD W` w Us L ayl L N a i V v o ¢ O L ev a+ M n! ? - �y L L Ip 41 .5. Lea N ^" g a�i ' O. q c U a x w � .0 A � L � G a. F' 12, .nJ 66. 1 � � a �o A L W 63 N N ^ �. C,wi V fL � tlI �" w C us w O 0 O, N L !yam m m LL e UC O in do U p y H ol LU a w H�a o u, a c o_ E jCDCL L `' W Z w d' 0G N D <C Z L„w p'fl � U Q i tpAC C s0 O U. ^ d~ U in, O. LL m V �.: q; w *-.a L yL to Cfn p m � N Ow L O V O @ 7. O m U C' C ' d MNta ro p ` m U 0: M ald C Ib L G 1Q C C t�7 6 j 61 09 s4 vol C C C.d L C.i.:U. L C 'W.p L Vt } � z m � n � B u 9 a U o , 5Q 1 a �S a Y M �' V tjAll li l_ II r ` 5 e tee+ y a t' � urF a it i S E . T�' �' x'�v � .�•: � `�K`. `.M -. ��_,/,'�1 `ati.,� A+n �`a �..`." x � t r� `�..' J �l rrr, RLE Q 'mac F` A% K N, ,MR M- cl- 1 , IN }; r t z AWL CD x w uj _ ;ts w a all �. � fig LU I t� ! j 0 E, Q. L w L L j..-.� 1 L N d 1 �'d � a j Y MO L 7 d Lfp U U p y� 6a O. {1. C! L D'S,L Z�. o. C G b m E: ,.E : m w 4.. w V' F a u- A a r � tuN Cf Ev� � Rfa� c (A iD is a u .6f3 C L� 'W 4), 6?Z - C O p' tg S. .� C tU fa N'� G O ` LJ C tr,tff (n 'ch u �a 421V R 0) N.0 tp.,, fl- L L C C C A� "Sl 6 tpLP ..t9 C �w yy fa Cfa C k� uW. l a to Nr 'Lt0 fO `` �i ,•� tn � O C DI 9 N pp � :uGrm L( I- CM men a, t.cV of � G to EL W (a Nm a0) 0ul w E E E co E.. m� �. C d)-0 O W C o w �:'. w a iE s $ C is L .� 9 p� n U. N _.Cs O a N tlly Sm ' vy i C Lt n 03 , L to d U y� � Er ,vt VV ACC v �n . g EEC CD C 49 L g C W fa Ci +� w a+'. S: C O C7 C r E YS Cm - -CI S. o to al C! "' " e. Ufa A m rj d o p 4. U N to t u Rs $ 69 y Q 0 C (A c a, to 0,�, ou � � w q5� s o �s v � aatt O iA 4 Z.C.rJ f t Q O io N to { w Z, a 5�- m E O y LU 72 ,t E p p ij C 9�O O ® < �. s 1;1 A t i �` 1 d 6 O ti. Q.. M--:p M 'N N •.,uj y ui y O1 w 4 a o 0 c 0. x Cin 4 d EEC LU �•.- rt to Wren H � o a o LU CSt Ot i �i <C a O R aCD . 0. Di A cc �.. N ._ m 0 .�' l�/1 2*b V a Cr t4. X L Vi � H � CC C3' �J: A N O L 4 toy yy Ql ie id 6/1'E Y `Y <, i L tJ q�t N :P.Cfe L L A �► SZ O _ m Iv H (P LU L , ID x tn. o cry. � I � m L •L � . G m m im Z' � •E L w. Q w U N ttAj M N 'C bi lC CJ d m m dinj . 0 tp y O O O j m ems+ �•, Y6 LO.w QU3 rr U N N K V LU G? C LU w 3 m y 0Ni usL m O �J m Ul M, CL U, y 3 C m cinafo .0 x " mNL c «o' ro V L 61 N Lj tf y � O 40 y A H cm .. Q. 7 �t 'I.ql 0 w y =s I Ptn m .L+ to C: AG ua IM N 8!Q C w w. IM $) 'cb 0 m V ,. U1N N .0'r G .J S3 i S. w N Uf E r;jlo.0 S. C 1* a m L d s a! > m N m 6-`O'.G ° Ql w' m (�0 7 C d .'U!^11.,C. "ed+ Sl w N "� d.'.+1 U p . L� ms a>i tp Eau Ep. �.w ai 4fl >wc a� ro._ ut 0.0 C •q V i•& m;•G W•o Q E y H �+ :d G ra °' O ..� II C .• N t7 m tm v'- P m� k d O C , E"� a o N N G E G N E:y;o ty E N ? C an d ar c'i to6 N C7++ rv='LT aHi'� L a y,. Q ° C �Q�o v4 o °� Q• m m =vs � s o¢ tL. N a+-iwE: m° �a:-wc " -ama E N E al'a c u E `!- L u d w CC a.a^ m 1- > � o s•o c c, L m. Gi• C V ° a c ai �� > at L y=Q •CN roay�+w ♦._..a W39MNWr�w: � O `Om > tty v E °=nt7 cn o °•~ roo ECnn'" .. L.+ eq t3_ ar" sa o Q `�o a:.R6vv r.vN__.-4Sqm7°!.;Um, o' U'�`.L•,s r rU:mL`` .� t5t•°~=-��•��•L2�O+-:;•7 L� tt L>ci iE+ a., y«,r�,�tJ:•�C-I wu.,.p°��Na!.:fdOQ «Nai � Y lla in O to n m 42Bwo C > Stml s mN N E `M u av m> a' y m boom a Co m .O CN'O✓d a ,u T d U ��X G C' to a.,a., atm > V BrG+ N E tf97� �m o a) o 5- - > Vj ytmiarT ° c ry.00V �y .� LE07 .10 GasN"'di�_C a�_ ea ° �� '+� �� p�W"j'3v� y N� w .0l m .n wL.— EN .N-H �'y N�' OQ .41•• 0. +�,3 war aJ� S c7 N N G N .: a1 vl.m '�' U ai N .C C O1 '+a, m.:%. ° .Lr QM mQ Gi coi '.� �' L�«� y y s fl 0,0 0 N �.:d L C;ro �.. O;l..•«O V~I� C vmSw,; `•L7� L > v'vr �ro•° q •,�.d.u°�. Q7 r•- •� L al.' ° �C s.G tr. aroj aLa p•9 >.'Z y•9�L > L it OS.., H d _ ;7 7 �? 4-1 61- ;, vn r0 M tL (!t Ci E M.- O 4. N U M&GU L.CD O.�'O:� C L 9 S d t0� U 13 aJ w Cs ' SO.M W-0 m 0,6 CCr t�Si sue+ to:N L+. m D AINk W 1 N Ea•w mm N .1.L atWL ov N a• OL" 61N y � m -C41— .0 -0 E > ' Zej E �`Q � ur > w y 'Oy ` iir °u y�.a .° o ^em 0.c► ;e`a° E" � c �y.a °u R , U tUD N N•A L 6"+i C D'� m a UrS y.N U•E' .CL N 9 m t9 to N•- N L Ci tJ . `C �G=a f9. '?t u". C �`"��? a• o miG = ' ti3K mmC _ I. a. �mmaE'- 6 �,>'�;9 'A U. 01�L 0 � L L,ur C��`/_d >y in s.>,L U 'G ry._, asC 04" '1Ew .,�,4.G.W 44 �? H �'w9 aaib�,q •yG aigiwd A n M t 41 c c"a, ° � m Imo`''. ain in ti a as °• � N� �« c:ro - �,3YW QCw > ': 3' '0G '~ = CI C7 6 '' LL ,� ro L f. 19.. q {j \��L... �+, l® A d+ a+. F> ro dG I b yQjLsdHt. N ' td 63 L w >'CJ49tj.2 �• y� �•�9s� etc �ReaQ.Gto-01 a., in:�.�wmm41 Qu q' Q aJQ �E41u 6}e�g.. N pGti ��}} pt �C1ro ^� GgCdt ro �` U E CL C 'YS ✓ VL 7 tq faz C.O t8 N '8•�N.X a' -Q M ro a+ L O > .� O•�"G b'"".s.°.�wro+ qqtt (°'00Q'= �'�'.a N�,'�+�, p ? 'Z' C a•q 0 E U.<t r L7 C Q E m ro LL a« ro ai 'A w_ro�.+ }� fS�+ m Co 4. ME «Usk .."` yam C01su 41 �� of ►3 4 G 1 i a ai Cl N'l1• l4 0! M. 41 ?.O .1�r w w N IRWN L �. w .0 C N 01- L AL. ".. 0 .N l9.0 y C t0 w C: 0J C. al >. �..V p :..C.O C O y.c,Q L~ c0.at ff�rt71 L a i "O A W NL NN U C7�(D.-� y+0+ L. CL. d c c Y o d to c O c v o O. aMO Cw •PLC COWI - 7pL r,.'01N d«" 0 0): y N 9 t{9 N W fl. 0 > G t9 c7,jJ w Z:A7 V 0.52 " _.'41 L NJ C .0 a�'C76y1 L y'N C N y.N E":�• 0 W'O A lQ O C y� al A. 1. d.N ,,aj S. ...C a it N 1" L i W t7 d'O.y+ .VU•E« N N G w t� j.0 M "O qij tvS. O'fl aj Cn W i >^t C OC 9 OcaC to i is 0 NH 1 w"!vLL- '1- 00 — V C tl t ; CL y cro ER vLE �� II oMC u _ > LO E-0 u L C . A O al'O,0 O 01 L.L R f0 a Q1 V O L. CE C..- i t`"'":`y u. vi W C U tA:._ - o cx C1 M C a it O.c O O A o 'O�Up 0 w Q1 = to N •jJ N N �.0. ,p..+ EC aa1N s _U3 c.. 0.a7cO, L ,3 1 d y. O U R fA N l9.C L IA UL.. L ul 41 t] 41 O =C7 E 'd .7' a7.0 61 i+ t0, Q1 tto ai:a CL w w N N ai N Vl*• O U �„ b a1 6 C w L 7 W N T:1n O GI N U' '�.d C° t d: C O C ai u..a > c L 3 C O. air ®p b...`C N; 9 7. W L U '� .!'. E w O v ti3O L iEti1 IA1° c y > Ec6 ° N 9 �v .0 ;p.. L y0.' 'L$ Yry r 2 r O O•' 7 6T >` d w CD 8—,NEw N _T O . M (Aa7 m41c r -o j L AaaL.S. C C C'�.a L b �. y<r 47 O M y L g1 W F.. la 61 Qf la S O fa' G7.a s Q1 16 .d,r, e L" E�> G`a w N � �6 CavaLu11.4 « C °a$ p.41�;�. y:N Q �.'� ".� N N «:d w t0 �. tn W'V:O a L '�,fa C - N a i0 O ,v +,. w.* ta.N 3 1. M c C C w 643 tn GoL0 13 �r7-fig C ai aJ2 N 0. 6 uro w > > y �'�•��..0 3,tJ V Ito C c G7 • ` •� W u U. �:.8.�bCL M � to 4) 0 r. a c C 'O G1 ty Q p ° Lu W in 'M _U M. w cr - N •A � L7 a C. � N, y y yt 9. n U L 7 N 14 :.. LO«L".egO y _. 8vi_e`�. N•C A 19 N O N y O 4«O.�0:O..:U.4y19IIL. M M N wl B N yN C CaG M47OV L ro�+ r_ U•+ 61M to 411 �... N C fC'0 N C •C SN.. m �M t0 6: L SCO .Ll Ol Ifl lC i$•C7 i+.rat Li C•C C a m N` N C�_ Q!R 'C X"u a N R a�s. • > O :i y R va T. ;J pp G M.- t3. •y R-Ga.N t9 C i lfl'Cl .:um a Q, '°�"' «/ U++..a L O N. E •a b. O n CL i N.� 7 5. 61 t7 E o U C a.N E m f0't? M a..L 0 4.— >, O M a .0 G ? .S^�cm U« `.l'•b``CI C y A y N~ O L• Q.:n•4S1 U C. i 0,0th CJ cota� Tov °3CoaE� E E 'mH«.x �'Eo E M o U LaiLc cooco'oCo c.. m a R � N szN = z'xn L? ;.�-aaaca. e�avxwa �far---j ¢ww U VI a L. a R y C V Ut O •at UJ Ifi a�i O O 6 epr r L y Q1 L y y u y a E y N 'L r w+ C Q G N �1, Uf Cc b ei Vl Ul N y N,Lpp .= M «vv..C.im M 4N1 O O W .N N 4`L C L N a N E fl7 N tp 81 'L 0.0 7 S. 'v y � 5, «t!1 y, 41, •C wGt++ 3' L.00C.cr HaQeNLtRS' yyY14.uf �« N'`QQ M ON y« b y LAN 41 r tJ�'.— p.0 4S N. �•y�, d N i O C L 1A S.} •+ •3�.++ .. •Sr` o N A « @1 0 Q N 6"5.:L �L +'�,yp� L_:�`B°L {0 Q co y ''VS `�" C.Vl C•° >`i~I! 9.: .� O [J C VI�y. �Zs+0 ftt^� s� aii o� •y $��" o � c ® <fi« � aiasLa �«•C'�=wL++ N"HOt' ,++� �: .' M E to CtnQ> Q0cQ30 (n�G9�Lu C6U.3: j0.XwCL4—�7 LLUCL y .c d d 0 . z E c mEE d 'I Q w us cr N w O C 01 C •ro .N_ -Q w S N C w C - C � l4� A •C M ,fie,... Cc W � � W -O N tn W C N7p, N C LH Q � d l9 6L} C 0 L l0 C L C .2.. E 6 N 6aS u U 19•3. N Lu N W �N «� N W W .,� W- y w.C 5, M y O W w In A— m `s C C y GU7 t n ,f gnu Alm ,r ,r - t s t� ;P i oo« � o Qj a In«' co.+ N �,^N nIt�'1Iro C IVV1-0 �ttf L C g fVJ O�Yf.00 n 00 Let M Ni�D N. 'yam cu to LwN TO -W �','.,q. C = A t�� O6iG a+� IQLT � H •C C! i p y V N4. N O c r rn in co cc in f`. Q1 n c L �1 91 N M h.M fri i�em r!r N u t A 47 UJ o e 3 cncommQKl '7�� u m Ay ° f ° to W ?.�G1 ^� to y �.0)— aiU _m j 8 tD .+� �.+ a(2 CI B C Nam= I. 1— 6 C J N , CL .0 U Z yr+ 07 C'7'y to O .+ C1 y m cn,La N N M Cf QT ti.i]a �wy y'- C= > O ?N r+ {n ut Ln a 'O Y.. !q 1 �+ M M%4 �"-� ij W O S S M Ni Yf N N N c t/1 IOI� 7 VL` Q 67 Wz A 6t. G L In m ~� Gh0, r cp+ S. 22 \11 _ LL Q¢E\ \\ O $ Z 3C E Ll.tL U.U.tL LL La. "' m V«m+ rtl—:w NV)cn� �g G y c d c pIn L 3 y C 00 00 C*a6 co:00 — io �� 2 �« C L'. jZ .�.-.W.i Lh r N N e\.� '$`¢. L[7 ,� H >. 'UJ uj 81 m UV+V in L ui yQ C.,n' cta u at ra N CD R ONr/ .� Epp} tui\ 'C:"1p" {>$ 6 d d1 ;a U t y C di Go-0 m IA at� a+ is w+ d C y..V Z C g F• .(a 6 Ul O d d co CO 2 AaU. C3u C.t44z L QV N I4, ,6 t u C d aatn C.¢?., —_0 'a 6D uG.CtaCw timd''> LwtA t4Ca C *' +�; C.0 L as E. C IA O C a)' o p. O G` 'O C��V` O._ ? $'O r Fat6 v as toco d a vG E. 0 QJ I. i C aUtf, 61 . YCo dt0..a�C,3C = ax 3a^ g° _r . ".CG L�� U. i p tq a N ... _ V V�. �Ord.Q,O'L_.„� d a7 'L. 19�+ ls3'L L w L r+ LC Im vs C 'Mtn 12y �` y 'U Cl'LN� C a ai °N`Q y 3: H a yoS. >, = G.mE,t�" c mli,�zn, �'. , d 3 N Of,. O ° a" ..G t• .G C > 13.M _C OG.i:. �L3V a >'. "�� 13i ,�w G�7 N'ta7 17?Q'd "w.0 > O G' w" fin'. ' to U. pII yew Q _°`E L � C.m w R . > '�'' Cf- p U.p a >;:" s— R a ffi to F• a �,, 43 tna q - C,C1 u t EL1 E 81 p �p Q S. 14 Ul N' 41 O'w C A Q+E'gf,'d tL� R'> C Oa.S3'ai9 0�., CP �L' " m w'= Na Ln E C N a a; is �... .. 07 � a � G M >1 14 l� Li ^ 3 Q y'W nt Q�4 � Dub Away + . Oc a � MIS �a } acl ct '" { UO SQ5 r ales �- J { 10. 0 1 t ift ui r. a a= -34-51 ;•� r fi ng 7M , � � C IL uj LU Awfik 1 S --' %r . 03 om ka ui qm tom t _r.__; a�x►usaanei a U 't LU owcc ' etDv g LU Z' Rmcis = t 1 Z z '[ N W r. Nw _ t tea 22, .OMMI to a some 1� 810101 saw at �`' g ar $ , k� — CF RAI I HO CUCAMONGA Ii X O STAFF REPORT` DATE: October 25, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Ping Kho,`Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: 'MODIFICATION TO PONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR CUP 88-35 AND TENTATIVE TSOW Assoc E37-INUORFUNAltu requesto modify �e ~ ona� ons o pprr�alreyd ��'g the. andergrounding of ut'lliti"es along Base ' ne ;Road. for the development of a shopping center and relaged Parcel Map. at the northwest corner of Buse Line Road and. Victoria Park Lane (APN 2V- 111-28, 34 and 35) . PI ABSTRACT: The Developer is requesting i N A he be relieved of the requirement to underground the 'existing overhead utilities located 'in the old Base Line Road right of way. II. BACKGROUND: The project consists of a subdivision tExhibit "B") and 'development of a 2.9 acres 5hopp,nq- center (Exhibit "C") at the northwest corder of Base v Line Road and ; toria Park Lane. . Both were approved by the,,Planning Commission as Of, '98-35 and Tentative Parcel Map 11838 on Ngvenber 9, 1988. The projects. Were conditioned to underground the utilities on Base Line Road from the first, pole on the.west side of the cul-de-sac street W ing the project's risteriy-toundary to the terminus pope off-site east Victoria Park LAne, including the po::tions ~_rossing and on the south side of.Base Line Road.. ?he• uttl: tip in °relation -�,o''f:(�C property`are Y� shown on Exhibit "on. The Developer's letter requesting the condition modification is attached as Exhibit "E". III. ANALYSIS: The Developer is willing to underground thz existing overhead utilities located on the north side of Base Line Road fronting his project and extending both' easterly and westerly. from the project boundaries, underground the,portion across Base Line Road at the project s easterly boundary, and remove the portion across Base Line Road at the project's j westerly boundary. He is requesting that he be relieved of the requirement.: to underground the portion within the mold" Base `Line Road right-of-tray, .because- of complications with providing' service to -the existing winery, and an s ' 1 IENL � i PLANNING CO MISSION STAFF BEPOpT, CUP L8-35 AND TPFi 1,1838. -.8 F 0010SON ASSOCIATES, INCH OCTOBER 25, 1989,- ,. PAGE 2 �f existing re:aidencc:- If`: the' lines are undergrounded or undergrou;7a services prpvided, they .'will most probably, conflict With future development of the property and have to be reiocated at additional . 'r `I� expense. Staff 'originally placed the requirement on the project, because it appeared to be an opportunity tl clean"up the,,overhead,util ties along the entire project. frontagr given thor,gh they slid extend across the j street. The Developer 'did" not obj4dt to" the requirement at the project-- approval hearing; .therefore, it R«sinot discussed by the Planninq Cowi ssi on. If the Commission =should 'decide ;to 91't the Aereloper`s rl4ulist" it would appear appropriate ttr.;require an in-lied fee aS contHbution to the future undergrounding of the utilities to;remain.' V CONCLUSIuY: Staff feels there are merits to both Hides of. this issue wbicil -aill require a pol-+— deeision by the Planning Cor ;3sion, therefore, resoi4ti6ns N -ding the' Comrilission's action will be brought back on . �onsent calc:r►da,>.of the next available PTanning Commission meeting. , V. RECO+MENDATIOk: ANk j Staff recommends that the Punning 'COMMISsion consider all Input and elements of the Developer's request and" direct staff to prepare resolutians reflecting thv GoMisMon's decisitbn, Respectfully, submitted, Barrye R. Manson Senior Civil Engineer SRH.PK:dlw Ae,ahmsents` Vicinity Hap (Exhibit "A") 'tentative Parcel Map 11838 (Exhibit "8b) CUP 88-35 Site Alan (Kxhibi.t "C") i�.acalOpertility �s Letter,(Exhibita"El) ( O. a=. Q �, .: i - uj° RANCH CUCAMONGA I ® .e. _ A' i i, r 1/ A �"5i`�F�L '� J ;`"'..�„', •. � D7 �"y l•e•ra• ••.{r. AOL UNItCP�p� i'.iilao i �. l 1 r,� .,f � "l P �tl <<"'.•5 ��•4� �r Y.QGANt VKCANr lit 'SCfT i ION i' ': r -!Jl i' i, r15f�!•`.`i t� f� dNL". gg/��u�. �j+p .0 Zone "MrIt G!/911y7 CA'8. .kH•l7AMYr •-r•� .._I+ r�•Yeti. � r J t vc����\� .•r.r.. __ exv t j '�ftffiN/G AvdA6/VT�� t! f Ve c"y OF otp. O RANCHO CUCAMONGA Y0. r rucwawc roues cwnr ¢✓•'`�J] + ,• � r net waar•oo._.�. � �(�jj�-;', won, � 1 c' maps ffi •.qi..� ! Midcow ,1'�I�AI RANCHO CUCAMONGA •-CUP 98-3S, $,I e P44.ry ENODUMMG DPMON, EXEMBrl%. r ,I `i P:-\fZCEL Ji1\r 11338 " I i r I ' REMAINDERPARCEL pArr EL P ?c� Zod� ExisT. Bu/c4/�YG uro R n"In ® e RA _ ® _W' -- .S C OLO V R® !3£ KEMOVED� r- Ae- �- I, C "OF cup a's®Ss. PM it ass R t4vHGr,CLIC ONG :04IMMMO DMMON I a ON �n �: rr �tr may.® . �dU tr w" .F: 0;864dscai76' Associates, Inc. ., . .ENGINEERING PLANNING SURVEYING AACH{TECTURE LANDSCAPEARCHITECTURE W. September 26, 1989 Mr. Burry Hanson CITY OV RANCHO CUCAMOh°.A Engineering Development Rnview 9320 'Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Reques? for Modification of Condition CUP 88-:15, Tentative P.M. 11838 r124 pF°4lrL'yn NGINFfRING 0lYISIL1,�rNG`� Dear- Mr. Hanson! A meeting wa= held at the City offices on SepteWodt 25th to discuss Engineering Division Condition No. 1 o.f the Conditional Use- Permit and Condition No. I of the Tentative Map ,relating to the undargrounding of existing overhead utilities Attending 'the meeting where myself, Joe Stofa and Phil verbnra of your office and Ed Long of Southern California Edison Compary. [ Du-ring the meeting Ed Long presented the Preliminary Plan for the undergrounding of the, existing overhead lines and indicated which poles and lines would be removed. He also pointed out a problem with removinq certain poles and lines which now serve residence and the historical winery building lying south of our project. As shown on the enclosed plat, the poler,+,,.and lines which are proposed to remain are in the old Bsseli0e Road.right of way Which will eventually be abandallad and ;�Atciaimed back to private ownerships. Pecause of this it i�i unfeasible to put this portaon of line underground when it coule)'.�onflict with future uses of this property. Ed Long also indicated that there is no. ` practical way to provide alternrat$ 'sec:ice for the 7 2kv winery, linP-, or the resiamce. Based on this information the projUt, applicant Hughes Invevh ments, Two Corporate Plaza $250, NeUoort,Beach, CA ;92660 requests a modification to-the above; referenced conditions relat- ing to the undergrounding of existing overhead utilities. The, Moir-,&F Ominous CUY O •�� na M�- lJ.r Mr Barry 11anson � City of Ri4icho Cdcamonga � gaga: 2 r` modification wti:old allow.the existing pales and° lines located in the old Base- Zine Roa- right-Of way to remain until, such 'tizae are the. proper« tiee southerly of is deveZope and adjacent to said right of,way c . If you have any gtiestions ragatrding this tatter' or requzro additional inr;ormation please'-do not )agitated call ma. `2 r Very truly yours, " a.-F. t*VIDSON ASSOCIATES, INC -Ron 7 Edison senior Project-Manager, ` cc: John Potter,`=Hughe,j Investments- aim Bailey, William Lyon Company' Geoff Reeslund, SGPA fs , DJE:.ldg coltwp::letter•bs8 (r h -e lam ' 1XIMM76 77 slow 1�8avads®e9 Bsa®cease , leat>r 1"ENGINEERING PLANNfNG SURVEYING ;ARCHITECTURE LANDSCAPEA9646TEC7URE October 25, 1989 Mr. Barrye �R. Hanson " Q CITY,OF RANCHO CUCM40NGA Engineering Division Fyd.� S' Rancho9320 aCucamongaadCA 9,1730 cy��yyo�, ,9�9 Re: .. Request for Modification of Conditi9n �saq�oy CUP 88 35, Parcel Map 1Y838 Dear Mr. Hanson: I As representatives of the developer said project we respectfully request r, continuancd of the Planning Commission hearing date from October 25, 1989 to the Novei-:)er 29, 1989 hearing date. 'We feel that this time will allow us 'to meet again with the Staff and Utility Company representatives to 'determine the best course. to take'rcgarding utility undergrounding ssue' 'on Baseline Road. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, J.F. DAVIDSON AS ��IATES, INC„ �� Don J: Edison Senior Project Manager II cc: -John' Potter, Hughes Investments John Fayes,,Hughes Investments' DJE:klg coltwp:-1etter'sbw5 3880LemonStreet.Suite300 1091.0 $.MLVt=onAvenue'•: 73-080ElPaseo,suite 106 27349defterson,Suitelt5 ,P.0.9ox493 Callon.'CA92324 Palm Deserl.CA92260 - P.O.8oz3 Rivcrsttle,CA92502 (714)825-1062 (319)34E5691 RanchoCalifomta CA92390 (714)686-CR#4 FAX714-8259583 FAXEi934U-0529 (714)676.7710 FAX 714 686 5954' FAX714 699198t nul CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORI J ✓ DATE: October 25, 989: TO: Chairman and Membtz% of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Anna-Lisa Hernandez, Planning Aide SIiBJECT: ENTERTAINMENT PEPMIT 89-02 - `POLO GROUNDS - A review of compliance;of conditionsof approval for an'-entertainment permit approved for Harry Vs restaurant (presently, Polo G?ounds) locate at 10877 Foothill ,Boulevard APN: 208-382-10. I. ABSTRACT: The purpose of this report is to review compliance with the approved conditions of Entertainment Permit 89-02 outlined at the April 26, 1989 Planning:,Commission meeting and to present an analysis of the a.ctIvities that have occurred at the site, during the 180 day monitottng period. In addition,; staff will present ACk options open to thd-4Pianring Commission pending this review. II. BACKGROUND. On April 26, 1989 the Planning Commission declined` revocation of Entertainment Permit 87-01 ,}which ,, granted the Entertainment uses; of "a disc jockey doing vdzi8ls and dancing in conjunction with a restraurantMightclub use" `at Harry Cls. In addition to Entertainment Permit 8T-01, the applic;xt submitted Entertainment Permit 89-02, expanding the uses to.- `,-dde "live` j come`y acts, entertainment 6.1ncerts, and Jazz" t&"the current apF, ,ved entertainment_ uses :ef .a live disc':-Jockey-and-dancsng. - -` The `two permit's were approved with.a 180 day'nkmitoring period by the Commission for,,compliance with the cond Q ions outlined i4 Resolution Numbers 89-53 & 89-54 (see Exhibit "B"). Since the approval of Entertainment Permit 89,02, it is important to note that thg busyness has: changedownership to the Polo Club, III ANALYSIS: The. primary issues in reviewirigz,Entertainment'Permit y 89-02 is compliance with,thc.approved'entertainment activities and recant modifications t,4_'the building and compliance with the h conditions and regulations of the,:.Footbill Fire District, , Sheriff's department and, the Public Safetytommission for safety purposes.. ff I?CM H �� I PLANNING COli,MISSION STAFF PGPbRT- a' > ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 89-� -' POLO GROUNDS ` October 25 1989 Page 2 A. compliance with Acdeoved Uses: F The `five types of entertainment activities, ar�Jn_roved for the site, (Harry.C's) consist of a disc jockey, done vocals, dancing;' live comedy acts, live Jazz (two nights ;iF week), and occasional live ,entertainment concerts.. The attached. Exhibit "C" lists the types, of`-1a6tivities lleing f-onducted at the Pola Grounds:, These promotional activities " iC-I ude dancing, live .bands, Mo;lday Night Football, wine sa;npling benefi£, and 'parties hosted by ��adio stations. Njn addition, there are other act i,10es whicf''_cate unclear as to their'�exact nature, 'such ai, `''Vegas flight" and "Beach Party". The, Rancho Cjcamonga Municipal Cade defines entertainment '�as every form .of live entertainment 4ich essentially involves a performance. The appearance of sp;rts personalities,.cheeriea 3er�, or other celebrixies would not be considered as entertains -t " unless a performance it is involved, for example, cefeLsrities signing autographs w�uid not be considered entert�lnnignt, Cheerleaders performing a cheer/dance routine would bpwconsidered entertainment. B. Modifications to the Buildin : When -ihe business. cha`<,ged<<, ownership, several physical"c angel within the site occurredis without benefit of City review' and approval. A Minor tip` AMk Development Review (89-26). was eventually submitted by the ;a apnlicant'to the Planning Department in August,1 989, Through the review process staff repeatedly requested that the I4 applicant submit detailed site plans, and floor plans sgowing all these minor changes p~br to forma"Cizing the approval.' To 'k date, the applicant has not submitted any reviscd.alans while the ;codifications are complete., Following i.c a summary of the St , t modifications that Staff is aware of A I. An upper dance fidoe, which totals,,appro X1 mately.. square j� feet, has been created. Currently, the approved dance floor area totals approximately 300 square feet with two Vt security guards in attendance. The DJ booth has ._been relocated to''the southwest corner of` the facility and'a small dance' fl=; has Been created "adjacent to the existing dance floor. Z. The landscaped area located at the southeast fjortion of the building has been enclosed to create a,fnew patio lounge with bar access. A wrought iron 9&4 has been provided for-utside access. 3. The working^bar area in Lounge No. Y has been'-reduced to increase the capacity of the lounge. 4 PLANNING -COMMISSION,STAFF REPORT ` T� k! ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 89-02 - POLO GROUNDS October 25, ig89` Page 3 Without the ,detailed plans for review, staff cannot make a determination if the expansion would ''need additional security.' Staff feels that the applicant has not .made a concerted effort to coir'','� with My regulations and permit procedures. C. Staf`f has contacted the Foothill. Fire District to ubz'ln their resu.t-s. from a compliance review. According to the Fire Oepartm ht, 'the applicant 'has failed to tomply with the majority of conditions and regulations set, by the Fire District.. One primary concern bras the failure to submit a tenant improvement plan (includ- ig fire sprinkler plans)` to the Fire District prior `o tenantl'improvements. This has beer an outstanding issue since 1987. Other concerns include the failure on' the-part of the,applicant to tA4 accurate.i dad counts to determine maximum occupancy within the facility riid the failure to "submit a new' assembly application that is reflective of tht expansion.,taking place. Currently, a number of violations prevent the Fire District from supporting the Entertaingnenti Permit. Included in this report are exhibits docum6i_zing inspections and infractions at the 'site (see Exhibits' f, G, & N} D. The Sheriff's Department was notified,,of the cempliapce reviewG_.and will be available at the meeting t ,)eport or,,, their findings. M OPTIONS: According to Section-5.12.000 of the Entertainment Ordinance (290), etiolation of any rules, ' regulations, or conditions adopted by the Planning Commission or City Council relating to the permitge's pe;nit may be subject to suspension or revocatir�i of the permit\. The foli'owing. options-may be considered by the Plannirl4 Conninic-E t'n:` A. Nan ComplJ',i use: If the Planning Corn issioe-,ried.0es that the apglu:ant.,hai not complied J.zta f rroula th,' ire-advertise the;. �. Entertainment Permit as a ldbl-c hearing for'cons Ideratforn of su pension or revocation.J' B. Extension of the Review Period: The Planning Commission may, choose to extend the review period &i.,.,additional 30 days in order to give the applicant time to cenform ta the approved 1 f entertainment uses and all other codes end, regulatfCA from 1 Foothill Fire District and the.City. j I tl !; PLANNING COMUSS10N STAFF R7PORT. ENTERTAINM84T 1•'�.RMIT Sg-�02 - POLO GROUNDS October 25,2 989 Page -4� awl _ V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: ' Staff recommends that th6 Commission Set pubilc hearing in 30 days to consider ,suspension. of the 7 entertainment permit. Res ully s 'tt d Brae er - city Planner. BB;ALH:sp ,a Awtachments Exhibit "A"' 'Entertainment Ordinance Vol Exhibit --'Resolutions 84�53 and 89-54 Exhibit "C"L"_ Polo Club FI.,6,3 ExUbit "O" Harry-C's Letter, . Exhi-i "E" - Harry C's Floor Plan and Polo � )und Tentative'Improvements Plans' Exhibii l,IF'" Foothill Fire Sum r ' Exhibit �^, - Foothill Fire Summary Exhibit."H�,,- Foothill Fire Summery AOL~� n L^ f �-� � ��, x• ;' fir, '� e?� tt Chapter' 5.12 REGULATION�OF ENTERTAINMENT Sections: 5.12.010 Permit, required. 5.12A20 Entertainment defined. - 3.12.030 ` _Exclusions. ` 5.12.040 App'licatioiz. for permit.. 5.12.050 Investigation and hearing. 5.12.060 Notice: of hearing. 5.12..070 Action at h�arirg. 5.12.080 Denial,of application. ' 5.1.2:050 Conditions imposed on permit. 5.12.106, Suspension o� revocation of permit. 5.12.110 Fees. 5.12.120 Time for filing application. 5.12.130 Security guard required at dances. 5.12,.140 Charter :o govern,.. 5.12:150 Prohibitaon and penalties. 5.12.160 ''civil remedies available. 5.12.016.: Permit required. No person or business entity shall operate, conduct, or manage any place; or premises open :to the ;public where food or beverages are sold, offered kor sale, or given away, and where any farm of �. entertai lent, kis defined herein, is provided or furnished without first obtaining„a permit so to do as hereinafter provided'for in this cht 1ter. {f3rq. 290 5l(partl , 1986) 5.12.020 Entertainment defined, "Entertainment" means every form of live enterra nmerr�, .4usic, so>o band or ,or- chestra, act, play, burlesque-I_tibw, fashion show, reviow, pantomine, scene,, song or_cl,"6e,' act or song, and dance act,' or any ether act-or perfc::z;an:e :p!4rt_cipated in by one or more persons for'the; purpose of `q,fili.ng �';t►e attention of, gaining the attention and ,interest of,-:diverting 'or amusing guests or_patro,ns. tOrd.. �' sitpart);� 198.6.) . 5.12.030 Exclusions. 27Ce provisions of this chapter shale. not be deemed to require a permit for the following, A. For the use of a radio or. otter electronical play- back device Ln any establishment* except mhen utilized-by an announcer or "disc jockey" who at any time provides any form of voca.T; entertainment, including the:,announcing of song titles ,3r artists' names in conjctnet;ion therewith; B. For any entertainment provided for members and their guests at a private ;club where admission is not open � to the public,• 90 _. (RanchoCucamonga C camon a ... "' 11r86) C fi1 " p •5.12.040 i r.Ecreatxon C. For entertainment conducted theater, air!1 a ' regularly established motion p pan o' a_d by ary park, circus, _or fairgi.4und; D. For, entertainm"Mt conducted by or or incor- bona fide club, society or assoc`ation, cone which holds dramatic or:literary porated for benevaneestablijshed membershiPe, an once per urposes, having from such meetings at� yegular; intrxvals of natfl�ns `'arisa.ng three-xtionth period,. when proceeds, i Yv society ose o£ such club, , entertainment xl:` used, for the purp player or association: For entertainment" »rovided sole�t of siavv�nz or harpist p1:Wing music,'for the amusement of guests patrons of an. establishment: oat or at any F. For. enterta inmen`L conducted' r operated,ate:d by r ar premises ar location whiff-`h is awned or °Pa en�.y or subdivi leased by, to or ficia the United Stortany spate a€ Caub fornia, cL=nty of San Bernardino, Sian thereof. (Ord. 29Q glfp rt)., 1!£'vl =rmit. AnPlicants for 5 12 040 ApPlicatiGr-, £o--r-P= sia,ned and entertainment Permits shay file a Britten, or his designZer f application :+itll the city mznager r verified app Iicant, showi..g: Prmanent address of aPP business A. The name and p. ess B. The name„ proposAd and Curxentr if any. address of the applicant, 1f t"s applicant is a corpora tion, the name shall be exactly as set Forth in its articles oration and the applicant shall show the `name and . �sf incorp directors, and residence address of e.,ch of the "cl an twenty-five five percens of �ach, ;stockholder �wnir not less iftthe applicant is a part- the -act> of the corporation, z „ -es and residence narshpr the applicatiisn 'shall stow the -a`1 ¢ the'membe.rs, i�z�:lsd;i"ng limited, part addresses of each.. °- rd osed enteztain nerS; -arsons ' C. A detail ededofeentartaznmznte hvw.ber of persons mega, including t1 P and•,any m��;sager engaged in the entertainment, as the city about the entertainment or enter(`ai nersr the entertai,s.-, may deem necessary; if D. T.he date, hours and locatiiOni. the a 015sion fee, merit is proposed to be conducted, a nt to be charged; ersns respon- to .The name or names of the person oruP licantIs 4 sible for the manag Otertaimn nt�ls;°n os PP ,�- " business and of any unction ,F, A statement any.tta betcarried on in app- cant s business, including whQther or not alcohol with such entertainment, will be served as- past O@ such Business.; arson or :per-. G. Whether or not the applicant or anY P sons responsible for the management or supervision of g0-2 (Rancho Cucamonga tl ff ` H ti y s.12.o5n-�-s 1z..oso applicants business have•:b'en, within the previousiten years, convicted of a c imei "the nature of such offense, and the senterce received therefor including conditions of .. parole or probation, ,if any; H. Whether or,not .applicant has ever bad any permit or license issued.`iVn.conjunction with the' sale of alcohol or provision of e voke3 ent ^tainment re , including the date thereof, and name of the revoking"agency; I,c Such other r.easonalite 'information as Itie city manager, or designee, may deem necessary. (Orix: 290 §1(Part),,- 1906) 5.12.050 Tnvestigatior" and.hearinq. After the appii- r cation for an entertainment permit has been filed,; the city manager shall cause an investigation to be made of such application, and alter such investigation has been completed he shall cause the application to be s6iZiXor hearing before the planning commission and shall notif-t'the applicant of , the date of such nearincr.` (Ord'. 290 §l(part) , 19861 . ' 5.12060 Notice of hea 'a¢.. After the citjl manager has set the ZpplicLtiorc fo'r heariivgr he shalt cause notice of the hearing to be giver" to all property owners within three hundred feet of the Proposed or actual location cf the applicant's business. Fnx the Purposes cf this s6 tio.i, notice to property owners shall be sufficient if given to y those property owners who appear as such on the las-c equai- p ized assessment roll. Addit ovally, the city manager shall_ cause a public notice to.be posted at the 1, ^- ion where the business ,or entertainment is to be conduct' =All notices - provided'fcr in this section shall be in- - ')rm..and marnII as prescrib4d by thc?'city manager. The',' _-ant shall bear all costs, and expenses in mailing , g, printing; and posting s+;ch notices, rand shall pay such costs to the 'city prior to to the time. set for public he-ring on the pending application. Failtw-e to pay such costs by the applicant shall be grounds to deny his application. (Ord. 290, 51�part)', 1796) . 5.12.070 Action at hopci:acl'. At the time and place set _ for public hoaxing as Loa; applicatior,l and as nay be contarUea from day to dal, toe planning commission shall hear and determilie all the"`facts and evidence relevant to ' the appli an: tnd Supe''visory �rnp<,ayQes, as well as the-, entertainment prop9sr3, including, the nature and location of the proposed ent,.s�tainment. (Ord. 290 Sl(part) , 1986) . 5.12.dt;O De-. al of application. At the conclusion of the hea-:ing be:ape the• pl�:nning, commission, vheplanning comma t _cn shall Grant, conditionally grant,`,"or deny, the app'1x ati on, ,hich'dacisa on shall be final nless appealed ; in acco,-s'' ath2 Provisions of Section 17.02.080B of. the Rangy v nicipal Code. Such decision shall be s 90--3 (Rancho Cucamonga Y urLf gat C•fr �! r SI2.090-05.12I00' ` set forth in a;resolution which shall::be adopted within- thirty days after such decision iV rendered. The planning commission may deny said application if it shall find and determine any of the following: _ A. The conduct of the establishment or. the grantina of the application would be contrary to the public health, safety, morals or welfargj; or B. The premises or-eatablishment is 1,:'kel.y to be oper_stec in an illeetal, improper or disorderly .manner; or C .- The applicar4i,or:.aay other person associ ates: with , him as principal or partner",..,,or in a position or capacity involving pull�tlal or total control over the coxieluct of the b*.siness for which such peimi:t is sought to be issued, has been convicted in any coact of ccmpet6At jurisdiction of any offense involving the"rtreseTtation, exhibit ton 6 pex`orm ance of any obscene Sfi^ow, QJV any kind, or of 'a felony or of any crime invaiving :moral,•Turpitude, or has had any approv- al per;At or license in conjunction with the:sale of alcohol or the provisioi of entertainment revoked within the preceeing five years; rIx D. ';hat grantind,)the application would create a p:ubli,c i nuisance; c. ' E. That the normal„operation of the premises would interfeze wa.+h'the peace,•and quiet of any surrounding res- idential neighborhood, at F. The applicant has made any false,. misleading or fraudulent statemeat of utiaterial fact in the required appyi f cation. (Ord. 290 §)(part), 14.86) . 5.12 01n ConditionsAmposed Ain permit. After the C public hes f,,q as to any application.=the planning ccmmis- I C . sion in granting any permit. mty also the such reasonable conditions as tc the use or ei:tent of r,^k rermit as it deems aper,�priale. (Ord. 290 S1(part-) , 19F4).. 5.12.100 Suspension or :evocation of permit. A. A.Iter notice and hearing, 'the planning commission may sus- pond or revoke any permit granted putsuatht to this chapter f if said commission finds and determines that any permittee, Ij his agent or employee, or any person ci..,ected or associated with ttie permi,ttee an partner, .director, 4fficer,, general ma:iager, or other person who is exewcising managerial au- thority of, or on behalf of, the permittee or any enter- tainer acting u.,dcr the .xathcxity of such permit: 1. Made any false, misleading or fraudulent state- ment of a material fact in the application for permit, or any report or record r,�,,qui.red. to be filed pursuant to this chapter; or 2. Violated any,provision ;of this chapter, or of -, any statute, ordinance," or conditio.i relating to his permit-' ✓ ted actit;iVY; or ` (Rancho Cticamdnga 9Q- 5.12.110-5.12.140 F ,Ili 3. Is .convicted,of a :felony, or any crime involving moral turpitude; oi" 4. . Violate`d ariy.rules, regulations or conditions adopted by the planning com;aission or city council relating ` to the permittee's businesj,! br;pennit; or 5_ Conducted a'Pe;rmitced business in a manner con- '._ trary to the peace, heal`tri, safety and general welfLre of , the public; or, �` 6. Demonstrated,`that `he/she is unfit to be,-trustedwith the privileges granted by such a permit, ("I ' = B. The,`decision of the planning comm"sion shall bt%r set north in a resolution which shall be adopted withi�� thirty days of the'-date of''such decision and shall b % ihal unless appealed in:accdrdance with the provisior.'_ of uection 17.02.080B of thv Rancho-Cucamonga Municipal Code., (Ord. =^I 290 51(part) , 1986) . 5.22.116 Fee..,,• the fee for an entertainer,, permit shall be seventy f 4e .-dollars,' payable- annually on or before January 1st of each and every Year. ' Such„permit shall be .n y eeasmaye addition to an the business license law of the city. However, for the year 1986, the .fee for an. permit shal`1 be the sum of forty dollars payable ,upon submission of an application.. (Ord. 290 51(part) , 1986)'. 5012.120 Time:. for filina application. All persons who will be presently re fi quired td le for and obtain an entei tainmert permit by reason of the provisions of this chapter t shall haws to and �.ncluding Noiember 1 1986, within whieh � to file their; applications for`an entertainments permit with the city ,Manager. '`[osd.. 290 S1(part) ,. 1986)1. 5.12.130 Se_ city yard required at- ,dances. All persons conductiiz public dance or- any entertainment where dancs",ng by patrons;,,Q= customers is permitted, shall have in attendance at the,o^•emises for the purpose of supervising the dancing and the conduct of all patrons and customers; -a duly licensed end uniformed %: curity guard at all times such dancing is permitted or allowed. However, the provisions of this section shah: applyk'only.to those es r. :tablishmes`or premises walere a trance floor or dance area in excea's of one hundred fifty square feet is. availahlem or designated £or; dancing by r-ustomers or patsdns. (Orel. 290 51(part) , ;"AS6) : 8.12.140 Chapter to govern.: .All provisions iof this 1 title which are inconsistent with or' contrary to the pro.- visions of this chapter are •repealed to the extent such provisions are inconsistent with.or 'contrary to, the pro- visions"of this chapter. (Ord. 290 S) (pair, :986) ; _ 90-5 'I Rancho Cucamonga 5.12.150 Prohibition. and penalties. A It is unlaw- Q ful for any �lerson, firm,,,partnership or corporation to violate any t�rovision or to fail to.camply with ariv of the requirements"ce this chapter. Any person, firm,` partner= ship, or :corporation.vic)lating any provision of this chapter or failing to comply,with any of its' requiremdnts shall be deemed guilty of ar infraction and upon conviction- thereof shall be punishable as follows: 1. A fine not exceeding one hundred,"rdol'lars fo!, a first violation; :.j 2. A fine not exceeding twc==hundre dollars for a second violation of tYe samerore niece withii one year;" 3. A fine not exceeding five hundre l dollars.r for " each additional violation of the same orai.na ce within o4s = year. B. Each such person, irm,. partgership,� or corporation shall be deemed guiliy of a separate offense- �or each and every day or any portion• thereof.du Ang whick� lAny Violation of any of the provisions of,this chapter is'co.�rnitted, can G tinued or permitted by uch person, firm, partnership, or " corporation and shall bfii deemed punidhable. therefor as,,. provided in this chapter. " C. The provision-- of this chapter shall not be con strued as pcxmitting:condue,� note prescribed'`zzz rain and shall , not affect the enforceability of any, ct%er. applicable pro- viaions of law. (Ord. 29DA1(part) ,' r86) . 5.12.160 Civil remedies available. A violation of any, of the provisions of this chapter shall constitute a nsi f sauce and;may be abated fiy .the city tlirough civ')l process by means of restraining Iordei`r, ,preliminary 'or germacent "in?unc- tion or in any other manner prc`iide.d by law` ;for the abate- meat of such nuisance. (Ord. '29Q" 51(part) , 1985), 1� ;i (Rancho 'G;ucamonga 90-6 , l r PA RESOLUTION NO. 89-64 AM A RESOLUTION OF'THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLMNING CamISS10N OF ME CM, OF f,ANCHJ CUCA7IMA,'CALIFORNIA, APPROVING.A REQUESTf'FOR THE ISSUANCE,OF. AN'ENTEIiTAIMENT PERMIT, NO 89-02,: FOR EXPANSION: 4F EkTERTAINMWN"'AT HARRY C'S RESTAURANT/NIGHTCLUB: LOCATED AT 10$77 E'OOT:iILL BOULEVARD, AND;MAKING FIRDINGS.IN SUPPORTTHEREQF., . A. Reci als. .: . .:.: (i) 'Q;t. dun¢ 241 19ES}, this Commission`adopted its, Resolution No. 87-102,�thereby ,ap)�raving a"ntert inme�tt_Permit No. 87�41, sijbject .o specified condition s, for a ,,t st jockey,doing va;ais�,6r dancing;` in�"the Harry Cis Restaurant on the s�tn st corner of Foo.t6ril`i Boulevard f;hd Spruce Avenue. (ii) 6 Augusfi-22, 1988, Harry. H. Chan; filed an application far a new Entertainment Permit No. 8B-01, With prop"a,d expansion-,af the naW , and scope of the entertalriment.' l . (iii) On September 28, '1988, this Commission conducted a' duly noticed public hearing,,'on Enter$ainmsnt PErO N6.; 88-01 and continued said." hearing to November.30; 1988. 00 On 4 vember:30' 198, the Planning Cormn"(ssion cond •ted a public osaring for the continued Entertainment Perfojt 88-01: The Commission felt V►.t expansion of the, entertaliment vas no*� appi�spri'tee due to!;'public safety concerns. `The Commission voted to deny the requat t top,expani,,ion of the entertainment. \ (v) On March 7, 1989, Harry Chan filed an ape lAcation for a,-n:o Entertainment Per 89-02, Mich proposed expansion of a, on nattar� and sccae of;the entertainment. (vi) -On April 12, 1989,, the ptanning cormissiin rtonducted,a public hearing. The Commission voi6d unanimaAFslo 'fie decliO revocation -of Entertainer riL Permit ?-01. at�d continued EntArtaitr�nt Peq 89-02`, in odor to alloy: the applicant time to modify the application to:de eta. fashion night and talent.night. , (vii) All legal prerequisities to the adoption of this Remlutio'- have occurred. 8. Resolution. ., NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by t;i 4 Planning Commission 9,,f the City of RMicho Cocamonga as follows,. I. This Com. iss,ion hereby Spec ificai;;r ;finds that all of the facts �et forth in the. Recit4ls, ?art A, of this Resolution are trip and correct. IC r PLANM* COPS�fi I;iSIQiN 19SOLUTIdN y0. 219-54 ENTERTAIINENT PERK II f 89-d2 �lAfiltY L' April, 2G, 1989.. Page 2 2. Based upap suh'stantial evidence, in„u0ng' written staff reports Departme 4nd furthe. , testiIi'ma4 ana'Writ*=;a evidence kesent d by the sheri;cf"s T nt and Fo�ithill Fire''Prot(!ctign"C:'striet during the h6a;ings'd,'scribed, t in the Recitals, 'Fart f abave, this comtmission h qy specifically finds as follow 1, z ;4, a. The. application applies"to propel ty locatc:d,on the southwest corner of Foothill ecr1evar` end Spruce Avenue --ind s currently develope with ' a restaurantlnight .club ,;that ks currently approvQ0 for an ENtertainment Pdm'iit No. 8i Or for::a, disc jocks; doing vxicals and for dancing b„ ' "The apP1ica,tion 'contempiafies the 'siynf? ant expansi:cl 'of the nature and : scap of entertafinmenttto include: 1) ''Live jaa local 4 piece jazz band to E 0.) 2 nights s 'trek: 2} CI e - stand-up come;W; "profess anal comealans 2 to 3 an evening entertain during a b to 90 minute show. Acts are e+' booked t rough ar, gntertainmen): agency: 3a Concerts:. occasicnal live e6iertai'Oment 'concerts `that WQu1c3 feature top name;acts in the recording inGustry, bao�;ed through agencies, I. Based upon the substantial..' evidence presented to this I Commission und..upon the specific-:fir�d$i ss.Q€_-fa:t C?t.,for-.h .in-paragraphs 1. . ... and 2 above', this Comission hereby specifically finds.as follows: a. Thai',, the coneuct of the establishment ear the graii,iing of the application would, not be contrary to -the .public hearth, safety; morals and welfare; b. That the prealise's or establishment is, not likely,to be 4 era%d in an, illegal, improper or disorderly'lianner , c. That tM rznt:n of the a ;�g g ppl,ration would not cre'lte '.a pPlic nuisance: d, 'That the applicant; or ally other person assoeia'ced witK him as principal or partner, " or in a positilon or capes"ity involving partial r�:v�narou t,. .ttgLSuN RUIIIITI0N ND 89-54 ENTER i AZAII+fENT PERti+1�I1 89-02 - HARRY C'S April 26, 1989 Page 3 or 'total control over , the conduct of r he business for which such permit, is' sought.to'be issued, has not been cdnvictad in.any court of competent jurisdiction of any offense involving the presentation, exhibition. ar _ performances of any,obscene show of anY kinds or ,of a felony or of any crime involving_morat turpitude, nor has had any approval, permit ar license issued in conjunction with the sale of alcohol -'.br the provision of entertainment revoked within the preceding five years.,: e, That the normal operation of the premises would not interfere with the peace and quiet o'f,ar)_ surrounding tosidentizl neighbarh©ad. f. That the applicant has not made any false, mislead'' or fraudulent statement of material fact in�,5:he •required appli:(,;ation.', Co 4. Based upon thc� substantial, evidence presented to this maission and upon the specifft'findings set forth in paragraphs I, " above, this Co nission by 2,,end 3 here 'approves the >application for Entertainm ret Permit t). 89-02, subject to the following conditions: �) This approval is granted only for liv�`.jazz`b.ands, I'• f live stand-up cou�edy and copcerts"as described i n paragraph 2 above. 2) All ',`persons conducting ,a public dance or any entertair.im,rit where dar4i ng by patrons or customers. Is permitted, shall 'hive in n.ce a ,the premises for fine purpoEe of supervising the dancing ` and tie uondrlct of all :patrons and rdstomeers a i duly; licensed and n unfiforitid security �geDard at,all times such °dan0i'hU is permitted: ;cr. 016 ®d. However, the provisions of this condition :k+'ail apply only where a dance .floor ,or dance area ;it excess of one hundred fifty square jeep `is available or designated for dancing bu,eustorrers,or patrons. 3) A micimum of twe uniformed, duly *licensed' and , regularly emPlayAd security guaeds.from a reputable security firm `shall be required, to be on ,:the premises from sunset until try hours lifter "the cessation of any ent3rtainma'at. At least one__of _said guard', to be ,and re' Rin non duty in'the parkf,'�q Arid outside adjacent areas of the facility. PLANNING-COWISSIGP kt`50LUTIOH Mfi: 89-5A j¢r ENTERTAIMENT PERMIT 89—OZ - HARRY CS 1. April "26,,1989 r Page 4 4) ='The hours ;of operation for entertainment shall be limited to,'Suri deU: through Saturday, 8:00,, .m; till 2:00 a. ., 5.. The Secretary of this Commission shall certify to the adoptian )f this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED 141S 26TH DAY OF ,4PRIL, 1989. PLANNX W C OMISSION OF THE, CITYOF RANCHO CUCAMONOAi arry to an ATTEST: ra u Ire 1, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning .Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certffye that the faregoing Resolution kas duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the .Planning domuiisi.on of the City. of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the P%71nini Commission held on the 26th day of Ap-ii, :19E9, by the following vo,—to-tuft:. AYES: CO MISSIONERS. CHITIEA,-ENERICK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY KOES COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: C"ISSIONERS: SLAXESLEY = r� 0 7i6y; inn�lap3a���a. o .., .-- - , .• RESOLUTION. N0. 89-53 A RESOLUTION!0' 'F THE `.PLAMNING COMMISSION OF THE .CITY OF RANCHO 'CUCAMON CALIFORNIA, DECLINING 'REYOCATi0 OF ENTERTAINMENT `' ERMIT 87-01 FOR HARRY : C'S RESTAURANT/NTGHTCLUB` LOCATED AT 10877- FOOTHILL' BOULEVARD, AND.MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPOLT THEREOF. A. Recitars. _(i) I On June 24, 1987, this Conmisk'11,on adopted .ts Resolution No. 87-_102, thereby approving, subject to specif4'ed -conditions, a disc -jockey doing vocals, for dancing in the Harry G's ger.taurant onj;tha southwest corner of Foothill BFulevard and- Spruce Avenue. A true and 6mplet_ copy of said Resolution' is e.tached hereto as Exhibit "A" and Is ircurporated here')n by this reference, 00 On June 7, 1988, the Public Safety Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga -pLbliciy conducted a hearing to review the reoi)rts of tau enforcement, fire safety, and related public safety problem,,.,and reports of expansion of the 'scope of enttertainment beyond that;! ')proved by th'is Commission and recommended `.hat additional conditions of,00kiratior be imposed on Entertainment Permit-No. 87.01. `f (i i i) On June 24, 1988, Harry H., Chan applied for an annual renewal of the Entertainment, Permit, as required by Rancho Cucamonga,Municipal Code Section 5.12.110, 'which included a request for.expansion .of);the nature . and scope of the entertainment.; (iv) Or; July 13, 1.988, this Commission conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing to determine. whettie-07 t;�Ostantial evidence existed to support revocation of Entertainment-- Permit %14o. 87-GI`: Te Planning Commission declined to,` revoke the entertainrt permit and',,' instead, determined. that the. applicant should be permitW to continue the currently approved entertainrvait fora period of 120 days to demonstrate ability to operate in conformance with the conditions of approval and in a manner that is not contrary to the peace, health, safety and general.welfare of the public. The Commission also added the;roilowing conditions to Entertainment Permit 87- 01 1. No expansion of the entertainment permit is allowed. 2. A minimum of two uniformed, licensed security guards. 3. A hearing should be set 120 days later to further consider modification, ;suspension, or revocation of Entertainment-' rmit 8741, `PLANNING"CIiiNISSIOWRESOLUTION NO. 89-53' r EHTERT'AINMENT PERMIT 87-01 - NARR"%C'S April `26, 1989 Page 2 Aft (v) On August 17, 1988, the d;cision was appealed to 0i C;ty• Council by the applicant. Tne City Council conducted a hearing and up,,� d the Planning Commission's action of;July 13, 14Ed 1 (vi) On September 28, 19V84 �Ie, Planning Comaission conducte6, a 'searing for the new EntertaMmept Permit a-01, The applicant was requesting ap7roval of the expansion o,P eriter.tainmpnt uses. The Sheriff's Department te.itified than there had been iX' calls for service since July 13, 1988, including disturbar�cps,, public drunkenness, a, Fight;.' and- a handgun possession. The SHer�t s 5 Dep etwsnt indicated t eat although they had b-aen ree.eiving better cooperation {iVe. - uniformed 'security guards) from Harry Vt.,, they were opposed to expansion of the entertainment use. The Foothill Fire District stated that they had not issued any citations since July' 13, 19 O and °ouid support expansion only subject to periodic reifiew, Staff recommended that the Commission not consider, any expansion of entertainment until the, 120 days were cowtpiete. The Planning Commission concurred 'with staff's recomendati,on and continued. the item to the meeting of November 30, (vii) On November 3Q, 11,08, the Planning Commission 'icard testimony, and examined .the f.:is duri, a pubic hearing for the: new Entertainment Permit 88-311 The CoMoissfioners felt_Ah>�t expansion of the entertainment was not approFriate due to pub),a = cohcerns a!a review. d. The Commission Voted unanikously (5-6) to pp` the' requagt for a:' new Entertainment Permit 89-01 and they 'voted (3=62f to continue• Entertainment_ Permit 87-01 for 120 days to the meeting of April 12, 1989. The' purpose 0f the 120 day coat;nuance was to allow this appl a?nt the oppo,tunity to establish a record of good management and safe operatiun. (viii) On April 12, 1989, the 'Planning Commission conductpA and concluded .a duly noticed public hearing to determine,whether subs?..ahtiai' evidence existed' to support revocation. modification: or declining of revocation of Entertainment Permit No. '0-01. The Planning Commission approved a motion to 'decline revocation of Entertainment Permit 87-01 and, instructed staff to prepare a resolution for adoption at tho April 26, 1989 1 wetiny; (is.) All legal prerequisities to Viia,adoption' of �his Resolution have occurr`u. B. Resolution, NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the � Planning Com nission of the City of,Ralcho 03camonga as fol'rows: 1. Mis Commission hereby s�ecifically finds that all of the facts set forth iri .the Recitals, Part A. of'this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substarMal e4idence, including written staff, reports and further,evidence by the Sheriff's Departnentand the Foo0ill Fire Protection c - _ ENTERTAI _4 NMNT--PERMI' 97_01 HARRY CIS 'April. 26, 19999 ; Page 3_ r4 f District described ,tin thq, staff report (Exhibit "Ali this �' gym.%sion specifically finds that sir6 November 30, 1988, the applicant has esbltUad a record of.operation .in compliance with conditions of Ertertainmenttpermit ` 8741 and City regulations,, •f J 3. , .;Based upon the itcord of operatfon `during a 1,20 continuance since November 30{ 1989, this Commission, declined 'to r0voke EntertainTent Permit 87- 01. 4. TtOs Comnission further finds that all conditions previously imposed by Entertainment Prrmit No'. 87-01, and Plsnning'Commission ResoTjt1.vn No 87- 102, attached Fareto as Exhibit "A", shall continue• in all re4�acts and��'3th full force and effect. y 1 S, the Secretary of this emission shall certify to,the Fdoption of this Resolution. APPROVED 4ND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF APRIL, 1989. PLANNING C%T4ISSION OF,THE CITT OF RANCHO CUCAMONG,& BY: A �-, airy Mel,';' n _ ATTEST: 'Arad u e ecretar { I, Brad Biller, Secretary .of the Planning C9mmission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, du hereby certify that the foregoing .Resolution was duly; and regularly *introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Comnissiol, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular :milting of the Planning COW-Xs;tion held on the 26th day of Apr il,r1989; by the following vote-to_wit� AYES: COMMISSIGNERS: CHITIEA, ENERICK, MCNIEL,r TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE. ABSENT: COMISS'IONERS: BLAKESLEY :I 44 r i rt,: , • � A� Ufa �.c+aFr.i Z �� `s' :� 05 E—� as 1N mQ cC;r a CL u Ic , J ta. o �� �? JIn tO ff 00 - ttl Y , LPJ to A+ SA I _ l.� w ei o U 1 Im m W z I* a A�'�� .fix G7 G» Q loop Uj cl . ..� r, LL^,� 3�o-oea•����?sv�a��va mus�a3t�mt w,d 00-9-'w d ap:y RUpia,-�SEPUOVQ s6Ui�nglo AluluM pug lCj�—''A'4to S lsclpj Ue astput'uataw°on&y.,of szauuta ITM of iunuoddp 2gug. 7fiteivautatduttr CUID 010d ;Dtll ( .e LlItM noot Tuasajd o�alil pfnom t;a_nelsay spunox!j'�jod aqj fN Z p' fq- } 10 r rwl co C. N t Gt p 4 o' Mu 31 Q' CL ��°j v (i 7 t» cII (40 � � • 023 in LU VA 10 sty 9`m12 4 LO uj CL )yp } Y X awls E"g roe. q b r z , 'y $ Y� �o gym ' �Qj t73 U LAM 0 —_-���'�1_ C11�C U � i7 N G •�R s V � #' Z rr r G Felt .7. J :9 CL co iN 4` lid 21 �. o Ca�y�ss D` o era, '.� ' • 69- � � ,�m � . 5 ,i r , ME D*INC WX� TA1NMENi' BASER 'UPON FEEDBACK AND INPUT FROM THE CITY '`'yNNING COMMISSION MEETING APRIL 12, HARRY C's WOULD - IKE TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING CHANGES TO THE ATTACHED PROPOSED:ENTERTAINMENT, DILETE THE FASHION NIGHT;AND TALENT NIGHT CATEGORIES, 9ve { � l rr q sosn>abnKIu BOu(EVARO w R4., cucArwatvGA,GAUFORNIA 91730-'(774)9,$0-0794 W(714)945.1444 Lu Ar lit I tt { + I Ell�311, f; 9 h tl sL t• eM•` 4 u f4pn{ ,rcra ��tar �a jFlo�»is �"r^er.r.-.:a S dtr! �AAI t` ,, �✓�,�.,c.typ` �c..a-ram-.a NCr.�- ,4 i 3 Y. G3 .4- IN #--- aIM,C R1 •�-, -� VQ 1r V vwe�.m Da3- {• rc�,v�— ��� �r-o�. `��^'✓c�..� :�a�J . c` it f�iY T if t 1t I tj �gg� �jt 1 Ibi�;�. JI Fr ('O 44 �J nit �_ 4�.lAA��•7� R``7 1 f� ` e ^z 7t IifY l. CIO . "f"• �� Y�.� J2$.:1,�� �b Yam; } _._- +• � a( 77, ilo II') ^,C ..r� *r.� r t —ems• 2i •i+{' ; 4 ��w�• �v�r"�v.��io�v�� \ r — (a 1. rat a9 , e t.nr..Fe ......... aanr arr rna v. JJ')T!'� r 1;tY IaOSSY Oee IaStOYY Notll [ �� ! )fi ) PA 76 to N nYV, f .✓ ;r Al!leno food ieuasuo ...T,itr,oassr . z�zaa+, • xW++ i ! ! i !a, lk Ju d � 1 .rr• � � � I art •�� I �' j al __I 'Ib�+��•r _ / _-. ,=t Itwiv, .* �/' '�`'Ja.�'v�-� L'�Y'���/� 31�1 Q..� t o y r • as ,� � s 1! z!}, ! i�;ri} a ,� � .4,'f zF rF.;.9Y•F( •�,C ( i I 111 . 1 f � ------------------- ------------------- --------------- I ! '•L•�(� psi Nam`, ♦� I �i'+n et s• '.t.\ •• _ _ { t �. 334�1 'lxlT 1 . _jli 11, Q.E .... . t... . via tw _�i✓� h I l v r • _. i pia$ �IIR 000 [� p�;'N ®ri ina! P � r Qlity � + i 'I'2a�i R -.Alllk Ih 11 gj I ]Icy_ � JJB 9 _ fin+ ql t.n• 10 '1 Zq, �• (7'OOFI _ i2$.vvaOvcD ��7, {38 Sni�r'Grtcr ��•i..i.�s �crv.a�2D -"� �oOT+•k solo -1-00 07- r'RrN � o pE>`d NEw 0 cr L.0 COW u ZN EN-rrYa NC.G —t"0 12,E 5*^�� 2�t�,,,a•l r-e,r�a e.� •: Pt ®'L. �tM� .,' f(�'L.� � ��i' '�boTl-� r"'P..d.O�-Cl't�E9 Tn f�•r�'t•eA ®v"T` E.XISTIN� WiNDowS AaA 3>oW5c'" -- Nam'. � r�oni b� Ft - ER�r �t&r1.S l y - vvgr@. •' ��tcGA-T� �� 601 1 s SG�J�Gi\ C.ut N�.�]` o4':'aJ?� ' t iv '�"�`••L 7 �",'"r2 — �fl� �.--�+e�-� -. t r�r s. c.�p —r-r� �.►a.�:ga�-r;.. " c� tt+l .� L7tonl Lev e-I cr - r, i UI AOL / �M►,�.c. . PFr6..L �r✓, �, -r ,� 'FIT ,2 CA , � p � \ J l ,�+- Original- Poor Quli � c��Ne Aft T� HTT -- i< 1 50.,42 rL LA/, 10 z_. {�tNa,irt tc'F+rh( _ -- vLo Tip 0 list DErr Pt r .rv: 7G0 _ _ (� J � — rrttF.ti.1 00 r 17 T. AuT� r fb4�J �ir�lti tJjn _..'. .— 23- Atsrr Wr�:Ntft- �{ R6rttl t•-��._iRaflCCtto I jC�<<ir� �bo{ 27 ��eu,te w�7 .t /9J0 p Awl _L M� 4 A (� Y; ... AI - 01 Na KV rn Ipflci __ -- - V Orijlna Poor Co aEtty 7-1 _e)q ,EIEPORT ON INS OTIOI"GF pGL GnOtJiD E RR1 C•S) I rHBi LF R ,?,C_e+l ��tFrI 1, As u"t_iHN 1 IN[ NIT WAS, :.C.A LED FOR -.N t'I11-1 J:A T •1.1-IS?ECTION, OF TH--- ENTIRE BUILDING, INCLUDING. A FUNCTIt7NAY, TEai OF.`TFE FirE AL RIVI SLlSTIMIA AND THE STSTEI•,'I, UPON' vlY APaI AL, I`SLIT INIT jOHN:.xE.•�MSET, jii L IDENTIFIED FiSI:=IsELF }:S THE OWNER, OF THE BUSINESS, IE TOURED THE BUILDING FOR ? 1/2 ;Irtza;s; T5 LOCUS HAKE BEET CHANGED. I Rj3T Tr.E NEW NI ASTER YE`i II"; THE ENO]-!BON, ALOI G WITH.II+:STRU TIONS N RESETTING THE BUILDIi G%' AT ARlvI SYSTEM,USING A XE`PAD. THE FOLLOI.A.TING CHANGES IN THE BUILDING MTERE NOTED DURT UG THE iI`iSPECTIOi`t: .L:i,S VTE-1 BEING RExr43. 'VED Fq GI,I E IJrx, ::IT TO tI$ KITCHED[ *i L Pf R DOO-R WA-t WAS CUT FROM THE WAITRESS 71ATION INTO T:IE ES I DiNI1.`TG POG I ('SOON TO BE THE IIEW BANQUET POOH) `-A 7,7ALL.HAD BEEN 'BUILT TO THE CEILING IN THE AREA BETWEEN THE '- EST DIPIIr2'G P:OOA.S fifiI)TF'x'zvIAIPI S)IP1i1IG ROOM *A VIALL HAD BEEN BUILT TO THE-CEILING BETWEEN THE NORTH DAR AND THE 11JAIN DIITII!'i ROOlvI,.EL,I.1,JINATjN0.b.I`I EXIT ''BALL T M BOOTHS,CARPET AIdD FLOOR TILE HAD BEEN REIvIWED FF%0.M THE PUBLIC ASSEMBLY AREAS *ELECTMAL WIROM H O BEEN'INSTALLED IPd NIAWr OF THE•77ALLS AND SOME EEI MIM ELECTRICAL LIGHTING FIXTURES HAD BEEII RELOCATED *}' VI ALL HAD BEEN BUILT BEVNEEN THE RECEPTION ARF'-.; .UlD THE e•74aLL AY LEADsI`lG T4 diaa-.REYTI?SL,70N1S ' QPEINING H,D BEEN CUT Ix4TO THE HALLWAY LEADING TO THE P.EST➢OOMS FROM THE BAR Cyr in l 'aar'Qo ity *%?,•RECEPT IOi'I :��UI`Iicr 1MD 5ERl ;E'.�IOVED , i7;r Trn Fi u:'R'. t7T it PER74IT TIG E':TENSION OF ELEC TDT At Pov R TO "rim iw'TT :?ECEPTI i Ct�tJI'ITER' �( 4 �f rTL CCE.=EL� ;?I::LL �t :�?.IiD TI E_.i'4:iI40; Ee�$F ilai r,Ot7TT.T NOW Lf' THE Dj.BOOTH HAD BEENRELOC"AGED TO-' SOOTS Ml� 'T^IE C,�.Rk.T, �R.4iSS DI�:IIDE,��ILS .itD FLDTI `sif?E HAVE BEEN REMOVED F�!?IrTTH�`rC'"+jJIdGE i1OTFiEfi L�-TtCE;FIOOF I�zt3ld .Z COII,STRUCT OI ,��JT �CEI'?T TO THE E.�'IT FrRUJI Tiny L Ui7CrF _ ,r i r•iw ISED MR. RAM,SEY TH4T: THIS r70P WAS E ViiA3UT PERMITS.. To. 1i� S > VIOLATION-0F CODE, HE tiT:i:il"' TP.,4h' jE R? TOLD Hll%,I IT,*VW��?FLU FuG1�LE5:I T©��tl:`i E L'H�S�1CrE� I REQUESTED Id OF THiF CHtiNGE"a FhtD TO SFECIF;ICALL?` INCLUDE THE ME:r7 SE.kTING APRANGEIVIENTS SO THE NEW OCCUPANT LO,•`,I? COULD BE C:.LCIJL zkT'ED. qpr>, r-A-R. gA.MSEi<:.i'�'i,,D 1AE Ti;, =—.. iS'a: Y IPYC tIE;1'Lil lit�LST.:%T GId r`�I.F` THE BOOTHS F -,klvt R IARDANT TREATED""B�Ci: E ST"_ >ASKED FOR A. COP 0 T1�I'. '�zIIC C?F HE C3irIvIIC.�I C��t��F�..I ALSO z�QL«STED°a=a COPY G' OF,THE FL_�,F� xF,4a� SATING POk ALL THE NEW WALLPAPER ANVIFE' rRITICAL P.A>a_ Lrj FYp .�:LI. THE IlEztV CARPET. HE AGREED TO FU ttisH THISIPIt���r 4.1 FIUlti. ANOTHER INSP!:° IGIT f'ILL IaE;CONDUC-M 'WITH PAUL TAILOR AND JIM TH0114I AS OF BUILDING A 71) SAF:,,.N AT`gAly T i4-�cl,,THIS IS THE RESLL OF T HE,4 I EAFNINO,THi-`%T%DIMS-F UCTION IS,IX M,SGT,BEING CONDUCTED. fK ti "�` i � �i 14•` 2 ,I - i ce �r :J NOTE TO FILE POLO GROUNDS 10877 FOOTHII'.L SOULEVARD 6.7.99 WHILE ON tTINE PATROL,I OBERVED WHAT APPEARED,TO BE THE DINING BOOTFFL OTIiER FURNITURE IN THE PARKING LOT OF .IiARAY CSRESTAURANT., I CALLED THE OCCUPANCY'AND SPO-'R'ITI DAWK)PRESSLEY. I SET AN APPOINTMENT WITH HIM FOR AN,ANN6A'L INSPECTION,;INCLUDING SPRINKLERS,AND AN ALARM TEST FOR JULY JULY 131 1989. 7-13-89 f.. I WENT TO HARPY CS FOR AN A,,q l'AL INSPECTION;AND AL4.RM TES1, I HAD ARRANGED THIS APPOR-r-rMENT WI' i DAVID PRESSL EY,-950-0799, '1 NIET JOHN RAMSEY,WHO IDENTIFIED HIMSELF AS THE NEW OWNER OF THE BUSINESS. HE SAID THAT DA:VID PWSL'E1 VAS N0 LONGER WITH HIM. FIE ALSO SAID THAT JIM'BARTON HAS SOLD THE BUILDING TO THERANCON CORPftATION'. SEE DIY REPORT DATED 7-13-89 FOR DETAILS OF WORTS BEING DONE,WITHOUT PERMITS. k IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO DO AN ANNUAL INSPECTION DUE TO THE DISARRAY OF THE OCCUPANCY. I TOLD MR.RAMSEY THAT THE FIRE DErARTMEN3 HAD TO HAVE PLANS TO SEE WHAT cot;,�TRUCPIC7N CHkNGES WERE MADE. I ALSO TOLD M 11 THAT WE NEEDED TO`SEE ANEW SEAT1i4G DIAGRAM TO DETER iIINE A NEW OCCUPANT LOAD, ESPECIALLY SINCE HE CONVERTED A FORMER BAP, SEATING AREA TO A DANCE FLOOIL MR.RAMSEY REPLIED THAT HE,HAD GONE TO JERRY GRANTS OFFICE JUST BEFORE JMRY WENT ON VACATION AND WAS TOLD'THAT HE DIDN'T HAVE.TO SUt?MIT PLANS BECAUSE EVEItYTHING.FIE WAS DQING WAS'"OK" AND JEMY HAD NO PROBLEM WITH WHAT HE RAMSEY,WAS DOING. _ MR.RAMSEY ASKED ARE IF I WAS COMING TO HIS PRIV NE VIP PARTY ON THE 26TH. I TOLD HIM I DIDNITM KNOW ANYTHING'ABOUT 1T AND I"BELIEVED THAT HE WASN'T GrvgNO HIMSELF ENOUGH ISM TO GET EVERYTHING'I)ON.E. WHEN I RETURNED TO THE OFFICE,I ADVISED TM FIRS:MARSHAL THAT THERE WERE CHANCES TAKING PLA'kM AT THE POLO GROUNDS WITHOUT APPROVED PLANS, I THEN CALLER $ JILDING AND SAFETY AND TOLD THEM OP MY FINDINGS. 7-14-89 I WENT TO THE POLO GROUNDS TODAY AND MET JIM THOMAS AND PAUL TAYLOR FROM BUILDING AND SA - Y. WE MET WITH JOHN RAMSEY TO•DISCUSS THE WORK THAT HAD TAY.EN PLACE SO FAR W1TTHour PLANS. RAMSEY SAID AGAIN THAT JERRY TOLD HIM THAT HE DIDNT NEED FLANS. JIM THOMAS TOOK SOME , :I PHOTOS AND WE WALKED THROUGH THE BUILDING. WE OBSERVED A CREW OF WORKERS POURING CEMENT AT THE N/W CORNER OF THE BULDiNzJ, THE LANDSCAPING RETAINING WALL AT THE N/W CORNER OF THE BULDING WAS DEMOLISHED. WHEN QUESTIONED, MR.RAMSEY TOLD US THAT A CAR HAD DAMAGED THE WALL,,AT THAT TIME,HE DID NOT TELL US THAT THE CREW WAS POURING THE NEW FLOOR TO EXPAND THE DINING ROOM. °,.. I ASKED MR,RAMSEY IF AN'4 TMNG HAD BEEN DONE TO HIS FIRE ALARM SYSTEM OR SPRINKLER SYSTEM. HE SHOD ME WHERE HE MOVED A SPRINKLER HEAD, I TOLD HI.M NOT TO DO ANYTHING ELSE TO THE SPRINKLERS WITHOUT PLANS. Ma. RAMSEY DIDN'T KNOW IF THE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM WORKED. I WAS CONCERNED BECAUSE OF THE ELECTRICAL WORT{BEING DONE INTI-M BUILDING AND THE currim,OF WALLS AND DOORS AND THE INSTALLATION OF NEW"WALLS MIGHT E!AMAGE FIRE ALARM WIRING. I TOLD.RAMSEY WHEN I RETURNED FOR A FINAL INSPECTION I WANTED A?REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ALARIT COMPANY THERE TO FULLY TEST THE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM,, MR.RAMSEY WAS TOLD THAT WE WOULD TRY TO HELP.HIM IN PUTTING HIS PLANS THROUGH THE—PLAN'ChMCK SYSTEM. JIM THOMAS AND LAGREED TO I•IAVE ME' LOOK AT THE TENANT IMPROVEMENT PLANS WHEN THEY CAME INT.n BUILDING AND SAf`ETY'BECK Ur8E I WAS;MORE FAMILIAR WITH'THE BUILDING THAN RON NEE AND I COUtfl PROBABLY GET TO THE PLANS FASTER,;to .m TIME, M. R: RAMSEY WAS AGAIN TOLD TO SUBMIT CONSTRUCTION PLANS TO BUILDINv AND SAFr-,V SO VW COULD ALL REVIEW THEM: FIE WAS CAUTIONED THAT ANY WOaX,.iM HAD DONE UP TO THIS TIME WAS WITHc)UT APPR" IVAL OR PERMITS. JIM 'HOMAS TOLD MR,RAMSEY NOT TO COVER UP ANY MORN OF HIS WORK UP711, HE OBTAINED THE PROPER PERMITS AND THEY INSPFCl ED THE WCki .'MR.RAMSEY WAS ALSO TOLD THAT HE HAD TO HAVE A FIRE DEPARMENT PERM!i TO CONDUCT A PLACE OF PUBLIC ASSEM—ALY PRIOR TO THE,VI?PARTY AND HIS GRAND OPENING. HE ASKED ALL OF US IF Wl;.WERE COMINO TO HIS PRIVATE,P_4RTY ON THE 26TH., I TOLD HIM I THOUGHT TIlE DATE IS PREIvFATURE BECAUSE OF THEPL,4NS. I RETURNED TO THE OFFICE AND REPORTED TO THE FIRE MARSHAL LOUR AGREEMF,NT ON THE PLAN CHECK.'HE GINCUILRED WITH OUR DECISION. -19.ga DAHLLIA.REPRESENTING POLO GROUNDS,CALLED ME ABOUT AN APPLJ�rATION. FOR PERNBT FOR A PLACE'OF PUBLIC ASSEMBLY. I TOLD HER THE APPLICATION' FOR PUBLIC ASSE IBLY HAD TO HAVE THE OCCUPANT LOADS ON,IT AND'THAT I WOULD NEED A SEATING DIAGRAM OF HOW THE POLO GROUNDS WOULD BE SET UP FOR SEATING SO I COULD MAKE Tf_CALCULATIONS,SHE WANTED ME TO PROVIDE A DRAVgNG TO HWt. 1 EXPLAMI D THAT WAS NOT MY RESPONSIBILITY i4ND SHE WOULD HAVE TO CONfiACTTHE AR HPEECI'OR RETAIN THE SERVICEs..OF SO.UtECNE, {. WHO KNEW HOW TO MEASURE AND ,:2AW SUCH DIAGRAMS. I PWAREn AN, APPLICATION FOR PERMIT AND TOLD HER IT WAS:READY FOR PICKUP. LATER THIS SAME MORNING,DAHLIA CAME IN WITH A SEATING DIAGRAM. SHE COMMENTED THAT SHE DIDN'T KNOW WHY JOHN WAS HAVING HER DO THIS AS SHE DIDN'T MOW WHAT SHE N*JAS DOING:' THE DIAGRAM SHE BROUG07 IN WAS A COPY OF THE 8 12 X 11 SEATING PLAN ' THAT HARRY CHAN HAD SIGNED AND FAITHFUL-LY PROMISED TO FOLLOW. I WAS I. INVOLVED IN AI+IOTHEIR PROTECT, SO I DIDN'T MEET WITH HER PERSONALLY, ,. HOWEVER, I DIL` REVIEW HER DIAGRAMS BEFORE SHE LEFT", AND MADE ,COMMET41TS ON T rtq IN RED INK.,I ASi c rj THE SECRETARY TO TELL HER THAT SHE WORLD NEED TO{7EFINE THE DRAWI�;G TO SHOW THE NEW TYPES OF TABLES AND CHAIRS THAT MI' RAMSEY SAID HE WI S INSTALLING. SHE WAS ALSO ADVISED TO OBTAIN MIL'`RAMSEY'S SIGNATUREON'THE DRAWINGS. I ASKED HER TO PROVIDE 2 COPIES AND I WOULD'REVIEW BOTH FOR OCCUPANT'LOAD CALCULATIONS. I WOCILD RETURN i SET TO HER WITH COMMENTS Op,,CORRECTIONS. I ALSO REQUIRED INFORMATION ON THE INTERIOR FINISTY AND REQUESTT��7 FLAME RETARDANT CERTiFTCATION ON'ALL" INTERIOR .FINISH FAERICS:LPiTOLSTERY,CARPETING. 7-20-89 I SPOKE OP,r'THE PHONE WITH DAYLIA TODA'd AFTER LOOKING AT THE SEATING PLAN. SME KNOWS THE ONE AISLIuWAY NEEDS TO BE WIDENED. I ALSO CALLED IIM THOMAS AT BUILDING,AND SAFETY TO ASK IF THE'TENAN'P IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR THE POLO GROUNDS HAD:BEEN SUBMITTED. ,jIM SAID THEY HAD,NOT. IT I OLD HIM THAT WE'HADN'T SEEN,ANY T,I.,PLANS IN OUR OFFICE,EITHER n LATER THIS SAME DAY,F CALLED JiM THOMAS-AGAIN AND WFrDICUSSED THE FACT THAT WORK WAS STILL PROGRESSING AT THE POLO GROUNDS WITHOUT ANY APPRO'vED PLANS. IT WAS DECIDED THAT A STOP WORK:ORDER WOUI D FEE APPROPRIATE AT THIS TIME." ;txlM SAID HE WOULD APPROACH TERRY GRANT WITH THE IDEA TO PULL THE U_�ILITIES AND I WOULD"APPROACH THE FIRE MARSMAL WITH THE IDEA OFA STOP WORK ORDER. 7-21-89 DISCUSSION WITH TIRE MARSHAL TODAY ON STATUS OF POLO GROUNDS. HE I ADVISED ME THAT WE HAD ASKED BUILDING AND'SAFETy,TO ISSUE.A STOP WORK ORDER TODAY TO PP.EM IDE WORK CONTINUING OVER TH VIEEKEND. I RECEIVED THE COMPLETED APPLICATION FOR PERmn,"WTT'�.r 2 COPIES OF THE SEATING DIAGRAM AND A BOOKLET OF INFORMATION rJN SOME OF THE INTERIOR I FINISHES.(LATE P ML AFTER I RETURNED FF;OM FpO MEETING.) 7.2S-89 I WORKED ONTHE(=U?ANTLOAD'CALCULATIONS FROMTHE MEASUREMENTS ON THE DRAWINGS FROM DAHLIA(POLO GROUNDS). TIERS WERE AREAS WHICH WERE NOT CI,EA:LY DAD SO I)«'ENT TO THr POLO GRQUNDS,Tp GATHER THE r INFORMATION MYSELF. I MET MR.RAMSEY WHO ASKED ME IF I WAS COMING TO THE PARTY ON THE 2GTH. I TGLD HIM I�H I DIDN r KNOW BECAUSE.I DIDN'T THINK HE WOULD BE READY, I TOLD HIM TiiAT I HADN'SEEN HIS PLANS YET AND EXPLAINED THE PURPOSE OF MY VISIT WAS ,TO WORK ON HIS Ov CUPANT LOAD CAL,ULTIONS AND h!�EASUREivi{sNTs. r I MEASURED THE RECEPTION LOBBY,DINING BOOTH, THE NON-FIXED SEATING h: r AREAS OF DINING ROOMS#1,.2,&a.EXCEPT FOR THV-LARGER PART OF DINING ROOM#1 BECAUSE MR,RAMSEY WAS HOLDING AN E&�ROYEE MEETING IN IT I ✓% RETURNED 3 TIMES TO THIS I;OON3 WITHYN A 30 MINU,I7F.TIME FRAME TO,SEE T " THE ROOM WAS VACANT S0 I COULD COMPLETE MY MEASUREMENTS. WHILE MEASURING DINING RODMS#2&3'l OBSERVED TPE'EXISTIPIG EXIT SIGN LY THE.RAMP TO BE:INTHi VTRONG LOCATION SINCE THE WALL{WAS BUILT ALL THE WAY TO'THE CEILING, AN AVIkTIONAL EXIT SIGN`YILL,BE,.EQUIRED WHERE DINING ROOK(#4 JOINS T HE BAM TET ROOM THE EXIT SIGN WHICH USED TO BE OVER THE EXTERIOR DOOR N T*1/BANQUET R00M.HAS BEEN REMOVED AND,MUST BE REPLACED, I ALSO OBSERVED A`NROGHT IR,PN GATE AT THE CAFE POLO. THIS GATH HAD A THUMB TURN DEADBOLT ON IT';4141CH IS A VIOLATION OF CODE. THERE IS NO SPRINKLER PROTECTION IN THIS NEW DIMING PATIO. THE BANQLrT ROOM HAS NGW BEEN EXPANDED TO INCLUDE-THE AREA WHERE THE NEW CONCRETE WAS POURED. THE EXTERIOR WALL HAS BEEN MOVED AND THE EXISTING EXIT DOORMOVED 40 DEGREES. THE EXIT SIGN IS NO LONGER OVER THIS DOOR. I OBSERVED 2 SPRINKLERS INTHE CEILING OVI;RTHIS NEW'DINING AREA. IT IS UNKNOWN IF THEY WE,tE EXISzTjNal ON THE EXTERIOR OFTHE BUILDING OR IF TM-Y WEPX ADDED TO THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AFTER THE ROOM WAS BUILT, THE NORTH HEAD IS NOT VISIBLE BECAUSE IT IS WRAPPED IN A CLOTH. THE :k OU H HEAD HAS NO COLLAR AND IS NOT FITTED"PROPERLY AGAINST THE CEILING. I BEGAN THE 0_^,CUPANCY CALCULATIONS BACK AT THE,OFFICE. I SPOKE WITH � DAHLIA ON THE PHONE TO TELL HOER THAT IT WOULD BE,TOMORROW BEFORE I WOULD HAVE THE FINAL FIGURES FOR HER. WHEN THAT INFORMATION:WAS AVAILABLE,THEN WE WOULD KNOW WHAT THE FEE WAS SHE WOULD HAVE TO PAY FOR THE PUBLIC ASSEMBLY PERMIT FOR THE POLO GROUNDS. AFTER 5PM TODAY I AGAIN SPOKE WITH DAHLIA BY PHONE TO ASK HER FUR THE ; NMASUREMENTS OF THE LARGER SECTION OF DINING ROOM#1. 1 TOLD-HER THE ROOM WAS USED FOR A MEETING WHILE I WAS THERE SO I COULDN'T'MEASURE 1T.' 7.26-8.4 I RETURNED TO TIM OCCUPANCY TODA Y TO MEASURE`DINING Room ol. " Tim - MEASUFZMENTS GIVEN BY PHONE TODAY BY DAHLIA WERE NOT HELPFUL. I OBSERVED A PAINTER WORKING IN THE,"BAR. THERE WERE r AADSCAPTsRS WORKING OUTSIDE. THE BARILOUNGE AREA WAS CLUTTERED'WITH TOOLS. THERF WEREHEAVY DUTY FIY-CMCAL EXTENSION CORDS ON THE FLOOR. DAHI;IA WAS IN OUR OFFICE WHEN'I RETURNED FROM LUNCH. I MET WITH HER TO E KPLAIN INHERE I WAS IN THE,CALMNLATIONS.THIS IS ALSO THE SECOND OR ' THIRD TIME THAT' I HAVE TOLD:, DAHLIA THAT�JOHN NEEDS TO SUBMIT P`ON!L PLANS SO WE CAN ADDRESS THE ELECTRICALJ EXIT SIGNS, t ALSO TOLII PER.AGAIN,THAT WE DO NOT Sli6V CORRECTIONS REGARDING THEBMT SIGIyS ON THE OCCUPANT LC)AD PLAN SH ,SUBMITTED, SHE WANTED ME.TO>' INCLUDE MY OBSERVATIONS OR ANY NEEDED CORRECTIONS REGARDING CONSTRUCTION MATIERS-ON THE,OCCUPANT LOAD PLANS I APPROVED THE OCCUPANT LOADISEATINO PLANS 7-26-89. SHE PAID A PERMIT FEE OF S75 FOR A PUBLIC ASSEMBLY PERMIT. I EXPLAINED TO,HERE THAT WE`WILT.('OSUE THE PERMIT AFTER WE HAVE APPROVED PLANS AND Iv'.,ADE` A FINAL INSP)ECa,DN TO OUR SATISFACTION, BEFORE SHE LEFT,I REMINDED HER THAT THERE WILL BE NO PARTY'TONIGHT BECAUSE THE FIRE DEPARTMENT HAS NOT APPROVED THE BUILDING FOF2 PUBLIC ASSEMBLY. THIS.WAS-DONE WHILE I-WAS STILL ON THE PHONE WITH THE FIRE MARSHAL. AT APPROXIMATELY 4PM.MR.RAMSEY CAME INTO OUR OFFICE TO COMPLAIN THAT HE DIDN'T KNOW HE COULDN'T HAVE HIS PARTY TONIGHT. HE SAID HE THOUGHT I WAS PLAN CHECKING WHILE I WAS WALKING THROUGH HIS BUILDING. v HE TRIED TO GIVE ME SOME MARY.ED UP HALF SHEET Pi,'k;NS AND ASKED ME TO LOOK AT THEM RIGHT THEN. I TOLD HIM HE HAD TO GO Ts 71ROUGH THE PROCESS AND WE WERE HAVING A MEETING THE FOLLOWING M(?RNING AT 8:30 WITH JERRY GRANT AND THE FIRE MARSHAL AND"MYSELF TQ,,DISCUSS WHAT WAS GOING ON WITH THE POLO gROUNDS BECAUSE OF THE PLANS PROBLEMS, ® WFEN QUESTIONED,MR. RAMSEY'SAID HE WAS A CONTRACTOR AND HAD A CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE, I ASKED HIM WHY HE DIDN'T GET APPROVED PLANS OR PULL PERMITS BEFORE DOING ANY OF THE:WORK AT THE POLO GROUNDS. HE SAID BE DIDN'T KNOW HE HAD TO BECAUSE JERRY GRANT TOLD HIM EVERYTHING WAS "OK", HE ALSO SAID FOI.LO',i`NG THE INSPECTION I DID r'_'i:JIM THOMAS, THOMAS RETURNED TO HIS BL rbiNG AND TOLD HIM,RAMSEY,'THAT HE DIDN'T HAVE TO HAVE PLANS AFTER ALL. MR.RAMSEY SAID HE WAS CONFUSED AND HE DIDN;UNDERSTAND WHAT I(FIRE DEPARTMENT) WANTED. HE SAID IF ONLY I HAD TOLD HIM THAT HE HAD TO HAVE PLANS HE WOULD HAVE GIVEN US SOME. I TOLD HIM THAT HE HAD BEEN REPEATEDLY WARNED ABOUT PROCEEDING WITHOUT APPROVED PLANS AND THAT WE WOULD NOT DO A FINAL. INSPECTION NOR ISSUE A:PERMIT FOR A PUBLIC ASSEMBLY WITHOUT A COMPLETE PLAN CHECK AND AN APPROVED SET OF PLANS. AFTER MR.RAMSEY LEFT THE OFFICE,WE RFj=ry ED MANY PHONE CALLS FROM HIM' AND SOME FRO L,CITY STAFF. I SPOKE SEVERAL TIMES WITH CHIEF bUCHAEL AND VMF ALi4LAND. V E DECISION WAS MADE TO ALLOW THE PARTY TO BE HELD S?Y+u� THE'BUILDWG WITH THE FOOD BEWG SERVED ON THE PATIO. THERE WOUT;0 BE NO OPEN'FLANW.5 OR COOKING ON THE PATIO.THE GATE WOULD: BE 10MON:ED FROM THE PATIO,TOO. 7-27-89 FIRE MARSHAL ALMAND I MET WI'TH`JERR-i Gi4NT,1IM.THOMAS THE PAUL TAYLOR OF BUILDING AND SAFETY. WE HAVE ALL BEEN MISLEAD BY MR;.. RAMSEYy WHO IS TELLING ONE OF US THAT THE OTHER IS ALLOWING HIM TO PROCEED WiTHOUTPLANS: FIRE INSPECTOR,KEVIN Vi'AI TAN AND ANOrffffiR INSPECTOR NAMES TIM DRY F B c &,POL,OGROUNDS LAsTNIG{�TABOUT 7PM, BGTfI+OFTHEM.RE' `t�RTED �'• WERE AT LEAST 100 GARS 11 THE PARKIN BTJA;dING. G LOT%#Ivli NO ONE OUTSID Y u 1, WE CONTACTED ONE OFTHEPERSCNS WB O I,HE KNEW TO BE W' r�r F THE-FOLLOWING tMpVIEWBYPHOI t1 D YP4RTYOR Af RAIv10N RAPHAEL MANZANO,DOB 10.24-45 10470 FOOTLIILL,SUITE 200A R.C. '91730 PHOtre 9894001 rt 6069 FALLING TREE L NE ALTA LOMA 91701. 989-9193 MR.MANZANO ARRIVED AT TIE PANTY ABOUT 1:30PI THERE WERE NOT THAT CARS IN THE LOTf HE ENTERED THROUGH THE MAIN DCOR, THE PARTY TOOK PLACE IN THE BAP.AREA.'THERE WAS A TABLE SET UP WITH THE fi.00D. THE DRINKS WERE FREE AND BEING SERVED BXWATIERSAYD WATrP.ESSES.. MR.MANZANO,STATED HE SAW APPROXiM aa:L 10(1 PE4u IN$iDE?DURiNCr'TIiE EVENING. SOME WERE TAKEN IN SMALL GROUPS THROUGH THE DININGRO,OMTO SEE IT. ALL THE EXtERIOR"DOORS WERE,IVjOSED;TO:KEEp THE IT A PF2IVATE PARTY; END OF HTltRVIEW > UPON I.E&P,*?FNG OF THIS DIRECT DEFIANCE O};CHIEF MICkIAi;'S ORDER TO KEEP 1p THE PEOPLE OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING,TELL PYRE MARSHAL,DIRECTirD THAT A CITATION BE ISSLI,D TO IvIR..RAMSEY FOR UNLAWFUL CONTINUANCE OF AFIRE HAZARD, UFC:3 1.�1 AND CONDUCTING A P(AILIC.ASSEMBLY WITHOUT A.FIRE DEPARTMEWP,EMIT .UFC. 4.101 3AMES FAU;tT,D.A:98?-9984 W'S CONTACTED FOR,.AN ApP(7�INTMENT TO ISSUE A LONG FORM CITATION UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF. THE 7R M WAS SET FOR 2:30P1l 7-7,8-89, HOWEVER, I,WAS INVOLVED IRA RATHER EX'Y'ENSIVE,FIRE INVE.�TIG�4TION AND COULD NOT MAKE TIC APPOr_N I IlErTr, CASETO DATE - r, }F.. _f4l I l _ i) r :: r RANCHO CUCAMONGA.'PIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT { October 18, '1989 �r To the Lancizo Cucamonga 1?lani MIK �Pmr.:xssiog: r Rancho" Cucamonga 'Este Pxotect�n rYrltri ._��" to go on record as supporting the city in .its :bring 67,!e F�o�o Grounds into compliance with all agency's i�artsireients to Maintain the safety of the. ,public: 'Provided in this xoporx is the documentation of ous numerous y, at to bring the Pilo Grounds, into compliance`with our "codes. = `: We have also provided examples; of deception by the management of the Polo Grounds. June 7, 1989 Demolition of interior"seating arrangements without permits. '85-TJFG 25.all July 13, 1989 Interior 'construction and demolition being clone without permits. 185 UFC 10.364), 25.112 July.1.4, 1989 Continuation" of`,remodeling. without approved plans. or Perm, '85UM 10.301.(a). On this date,. concrete was being poured- to expand the banquet room, as we later found out. Mr. Ramsey ltir►e �.�t `, while he was standing in this room; talkiog4 th; rre and representatives of Building and �ty, He told us he was pouring an outside slab and repairing a planter wall. Alterations .have been. dune to "the A sprinMer, system. without approved plans or 'I permits. '85 1UVC 10-301(e). 1 j Polo. drounds Y October 18, 1989 l5 Page 2 July 19, 1989 Reviewed seating diagram. Comments and j corrections liy me in red ink. Diagram unacceptable. ' Will' have to be resubmitted and signed by John Ramsey. -185 UPC 25.112- July 20, 1989 Remodeling, TI work stilt in progress, without approved plans or permits., '85 U1tC J0.301(c) �s July 25, 1989' Rev i i I,d revised seating diagram,, Areas of.use. are unct ar so r I personally inspected occupancy to,.. compared diagrams and"t; ormt them, where- necessary. ,This date°was the.' third time I've told Mr. Rargs.(,�. he is pre t:�ature in`.planning a VIP part( toMmow. �. j Observe i r`$W , dining patio w thout'.,a.utomatic sprinlcIer,�pro ection. hPPA 13. 185 UPC 10.301(e)h) f? Observed changds,� in exit construction without approval plans. or permits. .; 185 UFC 10.301(e) July 26, 1989 Still have ro- construction plans or permits for construction work. IS U C 18.301(e) By order of the Fire Marshal, there`will be no': VIP party toni ght at Poles Grounds. Mr -Ramsey's rep., was personally advised by me with the Fire Marshal on -ther phone-- .hearing -.our-conversat`cn, . .< ._. that there would be no party.. Mr. Ramsey came in to, our office in the late afternoon complain a;--'that he didn't know, he couldn't have his party. He admitted in front of staff that he has a contractor's license and knows the ,state laws on requiring plans prier to doing construction. See > signed statement by ' Robin Rohrbaugh. &NOT �� Z Polo Grounds October 18, 1989 Page 3 Chief Michael had several phone calls with John Ramsey and the Fire Marshal over the scheduled VIP party= tonight. Chief Michael spe&,1cally ordered'lvir. Ramsey not to hold the party inside the building Because' it hasn't been approved for occupancy, See the Chxe#"s ;signed statement. Mr: Ramsey held,,his VIP party, allowing more,,, han 100 people in the�,building against the direct n- er of the Fire Chien.l) '85 UFC, 3.102. fee s5ign�d.s.atements _by In ector's Kevin Walton and4a Pejeranx See interY��v with party attender�-imon Manzanod Ivlr,'Ramsey condo-ted a public assembly gathering w` out a fire department permit. -8 S UFC 4.101 July 27, 1989 Fire Marshal Almand and I went to Po)o GMunds to discuss VIP party problems with Mr. Ramsey, He admitted the party goers in, tho building after agreeing to Chief Michael's requirement they must stay outside. July 28, 1989 Puns of floor plan ''submitted. to fire department, Chien Almand advised they were unacceptable because they are Harry Cs plans. 'There is no �� identification they are for Polo Grounds, nor do they show all the 'changes which were done by Mr. Ramsey. Mr. Ramsey was advised to bring in i�tc�fessxonally, prepared TI plains, not copies of old Barry C's ,plans in discussion with 1~ire Marshal , Almand. July 29, 1989 Sprinkler-!alteration plans approved by .me. Mr. Ramsey was "'advised he still needs f� submit Professionally drawn ;set of full; sprinkler system plans for our permanent records. He agreed to do 1 SO. Aft ,r 0 Polo,.Grounds October IS 1989 Page 4 _..; July, 31, 1989 Inspection conclucted by Fitspector Fejeran to verify correction of .violations observed 3uty 28, 1989. ;Mr, 'Ramsey" was `told i e could open if this "minor" violations noted today were corrected by 8.11-89, per Deputy Fire. Marshal Ralph Crane, See, Copy ;of memia by Inspector FejeK n 8-11-89. Week of August 1 st r�' Inspector''t"Volfe in Tucson, Polo Grounds still:not open - no public assembly permit issued. sj r Aug. 7, 1989 Inspection-, by Inspector Fejeran} Violation notice left with Mr. Ramsey. This notice again requires plans for TI work and complete sprinkler ,plans. 4v' 'Ss VFC 10.301(a) Mr. Ramsey giV= date of 8- 11.89 to':ctrmply Aug. 8, 1989 Appointment with District Attorney Faust` to prepare citation at direction of Fire Marshal Almand for doing construction without approved' plans or permits, '85 OF"G 101301(e) Faust advised -me the Polo Grounds was open. I checked thee,file, the public assembly permit is still in it, Fau"?t refused to file against Pdz,o Grounds because th"tire departm,nt let them open. When f, returned to the office, I ques:doned the Deputy Fire Marshal about circumstances, He said enough:ctf the violations sv-re Corrected to allow Mr, Rams�yl to open however not everything was corrsci�d so the public assern�ly permit was not k issued. Aug, 11, 1:989 Aans stilt not,,-:submitted for past T1 construction work and fire alarm alterations. 18S UFC i 10,301(e) Mr. Ramsey is also still being required. to submit a frill blue line :plan of I the endre sprinkler system to show all existing and uw work.,, See note to file by Inspector 7,Fejerait this date, ---------- -- (i r' 0 Polo Grounds October, 18, t 9s9 4; Page 5 Aft Sept. 7, 1989 Fire Marshal Almand went to, Polo Grounds to see Mr. Ramsey,about his failure to submit plans. He i' Spoke with the assistant manager, Kerry, and specifically told him, to have Mr. Ramsey contact th4 'dire Marshal, immediately or het. would close dawzt the Polo Grounds 9-13-s9 and keep it closed until fire department corrections are made. 185 UPC 3.102 and,, 0.,301ie1 Sept. 13, 1989 Fire Marshal Almand changed 'his mind . About closing Polo Grounds: he was Advised the archi+ect y. heeded one more, weak to finish the plans. Fire Marshal Almand a reed to this. Plans not submitted as of 10-18-89: r Sept. 30, 1989 At approximately 11:35 p.m., while returning.home from a fire in"stigation:, I dive past the Polo Grounds, I noticed the park ia- lot was very full with over-flow puking in the --��to the west of the., building. I dove .through the parking lot and counted almost 3(�O cars. More were driving in set fast it was 3.couut. Oct. 7, 1939 As a result of a citizen complaint of overcrowding, and at the d,':tection of ticc Deputy Fire Marshal , I conducted a public assembly inspection' at a TOXi#nately. 12*30 a.m. with the Sheriff`s € department. 'The Manages, Kerry Iviunkittrick, Could not produce counters the Jounge hosts, are i required to use to count the occupants. He admitted having up to 350 .persons to the bzrAounge. I. showed hint the floor plats submitted Ud signed by Mr. Ramsey agxeeing to .a max mum capacity of, 4pprox,iniately 240 persons, mr. 1Vlunkittrick was directed to have counters arailstble to all lounge hosts for the fol"xowing night, He was also told if llrffr, Ramsey had a problem with the ' occupant ,load I mentioned, he, will have to prepare ad submit a nets*, floor plan for reealculation arsd �t Polo-Grounds October 18, 1989 u Page 6 approval by the fire department,: The assistant manager said he didn't know what occupant load he was supposed to rnaintain because the lire department did not tell .him the. numbers.. ..e fshawed him the signed floor`plan where lmr."-,v..msey had agreed :to the;taumbers. The:-assistant ,manager ;said he understood the capacity :would, be those figures. End of inspection. Respectfully submitted, auwan Susan D. Wolfe FirePrevention Inspector �> (714) 987-6405 SDWIss t ,r I �a ; Argust .11, 1989 To Whom It May Concern: On -September 26, 1989 at ap-,dximately 4s00 pin, John Ramsey, of the Polo. Grounds, came into; our offices to speak with Susan Wolfe: As- the Office Assistant in the front. office, I overhead most of their conversation. The conversation revolved around the fact that"he wrs expecting to hold u VIP party that :evening at the Polo, Grounds,"'anticipati:,,g hundreds to attend the invitation only affair and needed Susan's approval on` his plans: Susan very politely, but' firmly,, explained that he had not','-vet received_ fire department approval an& without that approval!, would nor-.be 'allowed to open the Polo Grounds for the l scheduled, event.,that evening. . 'Mr. Ramsey said he had never rbeen informed on thss` to which Saisan replied with dates, etc. when plans'were requested .for fire department These plans he had not supplied. t. Mr. Ramsey continued to pursue his request, practically begging, as welt as. informing, Susan:he had never beex infoiined of these requirements,' that he was not aware of fire department requirements for approval of tenant improvement plans and that he was unaware he would not be, able to open his establishment without fire department approval. , Susan questioned as to whether or not he had his contractors' license, to wt-A he did 'reply, "yes." She. then informed him he should certainly know, what would be required of him. ' He proceeded to inform'Susan ,of a wedding, reception he had scheduled for that weekend and would he b: able to provide accommodations. She informed him he would not. The i entice conversation lasted quite a long time, with Susan standing her ground, reinfortring, Mr. Ramsay,of the plane, that had` been requested weeks prior but not rA`vG4°red -- vrith ample time-to 1iecL, . It was a very obvious display` o£ waiting until the very last minute and then trying to find a 'way around regulations, indicative of a less than professional business person.' Re;L pectfu'lly, r � obin P. Roo hrbau U : 4. r RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE MOTECTIONDISTRICT N l�I RAI TDU August 11, 1989 To Whom It May Concern: " On Wednesday, July 26, 1989, at approximately 4,30 p.m., I, L- Dennis Michael, Fire Chief of the :Rancho' Cucamonga Fire Protection District,,`-received a telephone call" from Mr, John Ramsey "reptesPnting :the Polo Grounds Restaurant located at 10877 Foothill .Boulevard, "Ranch; Cucamonga,, The purpose of Mr.v Ramsey's phone call was to appeal Fire Marshal I:toytl' Almand's decision prohibiting public occupancy of;;'the Polo Grounds for thy, � purpose" of conducting a VIP` party. After discussing this matter with ,the Fire Marshal 'and Inspector` Susan Wolfe, it was apparent the Polo Grounds had not processed the building improvement plans for fire district approval in a timely manner, Therefor:;' we :,vere unable to grant occupancy approvals :necessary for Mr. Ramsey to use the Polo Grounds for public assembly, After considering all perti nenf facts and discussing' several "aiternativcs with my staff, I again contacted Mr. Ramsey by'telephone at approximately 6.00 p.m. I indicated that based upon -information available to me it was my t,',,cision to support staffs posit'_-,)n and that he was DLgj to use: this facility ;for the .public assembly VIP party„ scheduled that day at 7GB p.m. Mr. Ramsey "then asked if I had any suggestions, I 'once again specifically< .told I him that he. could not use the interior of his restaurant far public assembl ,I,,. suggested be hold his open house-outside 'the building-or, as an alternative, cancel the affair until" he received the necessary approvals of occupancy by the fire district. At no time ,did I nor anyone else employed by the Are:district 1 grant public occupancy to Mr. Ramsey for the VIP party, held on July.26, 1989. The forgoing,statement of `facts are true` and correct to the best of my knowledge Dennis Michae Fire Chief LDM/ss ;i n RANCH F'1 ORANDU\� n TO Whom It May' Condcrn FRO1vI Y{ey1 4Vaiton, Fire Preventton Inspector SUBJECT; Polo Grounds-,; DA'iE Au-Zmst 64, 1983 warp 26; 1989, at apprbximately 1906 hours, on :3uly whe.z passing the° Polo ''Grounds on �-nroute in our van to ntottced `the par areas were almost Foothill Boulevard I ht this was odd, since 'the restaltrant 'wasn't. c,mpletely full, I thong t MYwife. Z •didn't see anyone ,et' and ,commented.presumed. this 'that= some activity was going on open y and outside thAM e building inside. movie, ive were 230© hours, after dinner and a vehicles in the At approxim�telyr residence .and 'observed more no one, was feturni�ng t,o our ain, parking ;areas thar< prior at the Polo Grounds. `.Ag observed o+ttsde. Kevir. Walton actor _, . :Eire Prevention Trisp KW/ss s . MOUTH 11l1111 I'!'I'll t�- rr rY I - P' ts 'i9+rls ,+,vj✓` �h f jlP�' p -�'v�5!o+Y 1D 74, SF.? 777✓e� d a A3roP 'ij.dop. 74 C J To r,--,elf �� ._ '-..T t�>�itS S �.w'/TTc�!,�, %D G1/f?�'i•�.g._(�£ �;��Y'Ttij• r�"J �� tilop, --fit-- � w �7T'�-- 41 , a lfJs l 1.Jsr 7y lb. 6?r�i%rli - ice 'L�is7�tclr ,Shb.�yJ s'35J� k I i .. , t{ �l f !J�/'(�C�,�..,� � ��•- .. ���� rP/1/✓Jr�t?�.. (i�fOC.�`1r7�+�.'' _ c.�._F�E. IA2L�t�r,�J s _ _ -tvt 5F1J.� 1: rJt7rb1?GE+„tS LJl%�C'_ e, •(, [�+'Fts••1`3F� Q �/.JC���1:i�C1Jt47c� ��N(�i.�'rc?�I sl' t//`Ctrg-i^t�' i I 77,,v w Foothill 're Protection Distaict Fire Sa, Division CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION REPORT Date ? g� 1,457 port File#' Project Name taco= `_-�" `I _Address- -871 zt-tLL. Inspected With 240 E Representing cz 2 Pi+o^,e Name V Com;*ary A inspection For No. t Resulted in.the Following: ❑No Non-Compliance Observed. ❑Will Re-Examine at Next Inspection orrections Essential as Explained Below ❑Do Not Con" eal Until Re-Inspected NOTE:A COPY OF THESE RESULTS MUST BER;"ADILY AVAILABLE AT THE JOB,SITE UNTIL CORREMONS HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE FM INSPECTOR. 1►JSJRcc� alia ��Ll�.crr 1/t f/.�; lt.. 7r l tt 1 ----------------------------- i I t C (714)987 2535 pection W eti�l of the Above Items Have Been Corrected. uetaspector T FSD-3 WHITE-ME CANARY-INSPECMR PINK-,JOB SITE re PMec4&a Dishfct--.dire Sa,I Avisioa Date r+ Ite rc It 1484 File Nam/'', Project Name. `' *` - Address fag � 7 z,Paz Inspected With t.,C11�5 Representing c CSC phone#!'9AD-0pz� Name Ccmony 1 ' A Inspection liar No. { �Resun d n the Following. G No Non-Compliance Observed P Will Re-Examine at NCxt Inspection CorrectionsEssential as explained Below 0I3a Not CtiitceaI,tJntit Re•Insp :te ; NOTE:A COPY OF THESE RESULTS MUST BE READILY AVAILABLE AT TIx"IE.JOB SUE UNTILMRREMONS HAVE BEEN APPROVED BYTHE FIRE INSPECTOA. 0 tall ?487-2$3 tttspec t� All of the Above Items Hoc Been Cnr=ted, Fuulaspeswr � �L { � 'f . 3 WttitE-k YE r t eY-T1i5PECiriR MK-aoBsns CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT AUL , r� DATE: October 25, 1989 TO. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, C,:tV_.Planner BY; Cindy Norris, Associate Planner SUBJECT: PROPOSED REVISIONS T& THE 'GRADING STANDARDS FOR THE tnwANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN I. BACKGROUND: On August 30 , 1989 the Planning Commission. held a special kshop to discuss the proposed Hillside Development Ordinance as it relates to the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. As a result of the meeting, the Commission reque&ted that the Consortium review the Hillside=Ordinance, identify where there maybe specific problems, and provide alternatives in "keeping with the City's policy, to minimize the amount and; appearance of grading n= opy of the minutes from this meeting are attached for your revrence. AOL The Consortium submitted a. revised grading document (see' attached copy) to the City for review on October a, 1989, which has .been scheduled for Grading Committee review on October 30,'1989. The entire,document was retyped with additions and comments highlighted in bold and wording to be removed. struck out. ;:However, there are areas in the document where wording has been changed, e.g. should changed to may and shall changed to should, which have not been -identified in bold type. TI, ,ANALYSIS: It appears that. the .Consortium`, intent is, to �"i incorporate the revised document as a "sectio, n the body of ' e Specific Plan rather than revising the City�'s Hillside Ordinance. As a result,' the number of, topics to bescovered in the Grading Development section 'Etiwanda )kor0i/Specific Plan (ENSP) will, . increase. However; rased on staffs analysis, the specific_ standards regarding.actual grading have not significantly :changed and there are a number of areas where the 'proposed revisions conflict with City policy. The f^llowing is a' summary'analysis of the significant revisions ,prp` ;,by the Consortium and staffs response: ;t 1. Consortium Proposal 'Revise the definition of hillside'' from slopes that are.N% or greater to those that are 10% or Greater. The reasoning behind this request _is that generi�lly the natural grade above the Edison corridor is: 10% or greater. {,rt ITEW N. PLANNING. COMMISSiON STAFF REPORT RE: GRADING STANDARDS ENSP October 25, 1989 Page 2 Staff; Res onse: As 8%, is the grade at which significant impac:'i have historically become a concern, the Planning Commission has supported the definition of "hillside" as grades of 8% or greater:. 2. Consortium Proposal: Revise the hillside designation standards for Slope Zones 2 and 3. The Consortium' recommends` the elimination of possible alternative grading ald structurlt techniques for `land with slopes less than' 10%. Thel have (ilso revised the standards for Slope' Zone -.3 (2rrs14.9%), 40 allow, exceptions to the requirements when special design features, such as golf course or greenbelt/paseos, are proposed', Staff Response: Staff recommends that `he alternative grading techniques be retained in the Slope Zone 2,, as they are mentioned oniy as options which will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Additionally, staff recommends that a qualifying statement be added to both zone categories allowing consideration of alternative conventional- grading techniques for a project within a master plan which ,includes special,_.desigh features or amenities such as a golf course, extensive open space,; or significant use of greenbelts and gradientipaseos. 3. Consortium Proposal: Remove the section addressing slope/density and land capacity considerations, based on . the reasoning that the density will be fixed as a result of the development agreement. Staff Response: Although the upper limit ton the allowable density will be set, there sho!lld 'be some consideration given to -the environmental' and safety impacts which will occur; in steeper terrain including fire, erosion, flooding, geologic, seismic, and access restrictions. Therefore, staff recommends that the slope/density calculations remain, as they art a :means with which to limit potential impacts i�,steeper arQas 4. Consortium Proposal; Remove references regarding transfer of dwelling unfit allocations, as these are mentioned elsewhere in the Specific Plan. Staff ^es onse: Transfer of dwelling credits (TOR) is intimately tied in with the terrain and grading on a property. Staff recommends that reference to the use of TDR's should be made in the guideline section, and criteria outlining the specific provisions should then be PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF DEPORT' rat RE: ; GRADING STANDARDS ENSP "? October 25,. 1989 ' Page 3 added to the standards section., As currently proyitl"ed the Hillside Ordinance, the number of units which may be• e pis based on the slo a densit . transfers,t�J p J ycalculations S. Consortium Proposal; Revisions �tCr the submittal �i requirements are proposed which include adding a preliminary grading plan review and .a reduction in the level ofdetail required for the'conceptual-grading plan (i.e. increase contour intervals, eliminate additional illustrative aids, and remove reference ,to possible additional environmental studies). Staff Response: Staff feels that"the stand4ds outlined in the Ordinance are the minimum:, necessary to allow for adequate site analysis. Additionally, staff does not feel that an additional preliminary grading review ntep is necessary as. we currently allow preliminary review upon request. Secondly, the level of,detail proposed for, the review is'so general that misinterpretations and false analysis could occur, 6. Consortium Proposal: Eliminate any reference to minimum or maximum fill amounts_,or slope height a Sept as already provided in the Etiwanda North Specit ;Plan ( NSP). This is based on the,statement that all grading within the Etiwanda n th area will: exceed these f4,11 amounts.' Also-, the Consortium is concerned' that ;tb proposed standards will not allow the type ;of•grading"-,proposed in the Crest, Wk h includes the greenbelts wand gradient/paseos.. Staff Response: There are areas Within Etiwanda North where cus:toe; lot's ill e sleyel4ped. _':The deg ee,afi;slope;;. and amount of -cut and fill proposed Will .determine whether City Planner or Planning Commiss4on review will be required. Additionally, all standards'limiting slope height and amount of fill provide flexibility by allowing the Planning Coms'iission to review exceptions on a case- V, by-case. basis, However, spccifis ",aference to the ? gradientlpaseo,•,concept can be added to the language.' Finally, as mentioned in staff's analysis on August 30, , 1989, the slope height, provisions contained in the ENSP are not considered acceptable as they infer that conventional grading techniques are allowed an all properties With natural _grades up to 12% ,(see Exhibit a _ , � I PLANNING COMMISUON STAFF REPORT RE: GRADING STANDARDS ENSP October 25, 1989 Page 4 7. Consortium Proposal: That architectural provisions will only apply to slopes which are 20%-or greater, as the Consort;vm does not feel they are appropriate in less steep areas. Staff Response: 'The provisions should be applied to all areas defined as hillside. Experience has shown that the height provis ..i,.s -contained in the Development Code, 15 feet from average grade, can result in massive building bulk, particularly when stemwala construction is used. However, to provide some flexibility fGr downhill and cross slope lots, staff recommends that certain architectural feature3 (I.e., central roof peak, dormers, etc.);be allowed to exceed the 25=foot height limit up to 30 feet, based on Planning. Commission review. ' 8., Consortium Proposal; In several instances the Consortium has recommended-that accompanying graphics be deleted due to potential misinterpretations, although alternative examples were not provided, Staff Response: Staff recommends that the graphics be retained; however., they will ,ba revised as necessary to address the concerns identif,l<', and to further clarify the text. A number of other areas iof concern were identified by the Consortium including crntour ,grading, view protection, site design and drainage. Staff will review and revise these provisions as necessary t'p provide more specific direction and additional criteria in order to minimize the possibility of misinterpretation. As a note, staff has also received proposed revisions from a local architect. Bill Warkentin, which will be considered upon'further review. f Based on the items outlined above, staff is concerned that the Consortium is not proposing :any significant revisions to their basic grading standards. As <proprsed, the revised document would provide very few restrictions toward limiting the amount of grading and alteration to the natural, landform, particularly on slop; less than 15% grade. III. RECOMMENDATION: : Based on the fact that it does not appear that the Etiwanda North grading document has been revised in a manner consistent with current City grading policies, staff requests that the Plannijg Commission provide 'direction to staff through consideration of the following options: r C� PLANNING COMMISSION[SAFf REPORT RE: 'GRADING STANDARDS ENSP �1 Cctober 25, f989 Page 5 J �, 1`. Direct staff to scheduIe a Planning Commission workshop to discuss the s-�g9nniificant items of concern identified in if this report wit) tie Consortium members, or 2. Direct staff to .preA e,.acceptab`,e revisiers, as outlined , :I in this reports -'to the City's Hillside Development Ordinance;scheduling fora PlanningjCommission workshop will then be considdred after.,receiving the Consortium ; response regarding staff's revis,j:ons; or 3. Direct staff to prepare acceptable revisions as; outlined in ' this report to the City"',, ,Hillside Development Ordinance for consideration by the Planning Commission, which the Etivmida North Specific Plan Will be required to incorporate'by'reference: Re fully t�ced f? Bra er City 8 annex " 68:CN:ko Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Minutev4i6!n PlaWng Commission. Workshop Pr of npst $0, 1989 Exhibit `"S" '- Revised Etiwanda North Grading Development Regulations Exhibit "C" - Excerpt from Etiwanda North Specific Plan, Page 89 i l CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, Adjourned Meeting August 30, 1989 Etiwanda North Hillside Development Workshop Chairman McNiel called the special workshoo to orLa' at 5:20 P.M. at the Lions Park Con-nunity Center, 9161 Base Line ,Roae�, Rarjcho Cucamonga.` ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT; David- Blakesley, Suzanne 'Chitiea, Larry Mckiel, Peter Tolstoy, COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: Betsy Weinberger STAFF PRESENT: Mi%i Br;ttt, Associate Planner; Brad Buller, City Planner; Nancy . Fong, Senior Planner; Rick Gomez, Community Development Wrector; Loyd Goolsby, Senior Pian Checker; j Jeff GrEVel,�Assistant Planner; Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Otto Kreutil, Deputy City Planner; Russ Maguire, City Engineer; Beverly Nissen, Associate Plarsnat ` Cindy Norris,.Associate Plan::e, Chairman McNiel begin th(. `eeting by introducing the_Planning Commission andstaff members to tha groups Joe Di'Jarin intreduced represe�atives of the consortium, which included Jess Harris .,an Meisel of The Land/Piz&iDesign Group; Chris Pauls, Pat Gibbons, and Paul Taylor of Gtiwandf heights, Inc.; Nike Kearny, Richard Douglas, and Kent Phillips of Landmark Land; and Tom Tracy, Tom Hague, and Ray Allard of � Fuscoe, William., Lindgren, and Short. Brad Buller, ' City Planner, preceded the staff report with introductory remarks. tie stated that wring the development of the Etiwanda Specific Plan,. grading had been discussed as an issue. He said the Planning Commission had expressed concernwith grading proposed in this Plan and-elsewhere in the City, ar•,d as a result staff prepared the Nilisid*. !ordinance. Ha, stated the purpose of this meeting was to hear the concerns df the affected landowners t. and staff's cants and conclude with sow direction from the Planning Commission with regard to the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. Cindy ':;brris, Associate Planner, gave an oral presentation outlining, the sivstificant issues identified in the staff report. JCss Harris, of Land/Plan/Design, began, his presentation by passing out copies 5f aii exhibit' prepared by Fuscoe, Williams, Lindgren,-and Short,11lustrating general slope ?radients in the Specific Plan area. Fir111lill fic Mr. Harris then presented a itheasP c� is t�Pla the toecreate lanprett gt- He stated that the intent Of Afthoriented �ortmunity using a comprehensive Package which involves a layering effect of landscaping,, architecture,-open space, and other amenities. He also stated that d felt that the development standards contained Within the text , accomplish their inte Mr. Harris then gave a slide presentation,to illustrate similar concepts and. situations that they hoped to achieve. as a result of the Specific Plan.` asked Mr-_ Harris If most. of .the ..glides were of public Commissi6ner Tolstoy Ho expressed concern that the use and treatment of lands anc' rights-of-Way. interior tract situations. pub`!ic lands does not help it,, e Mr.. Hart is responded that they were at to create a community N. from a distance. Mr. Harris then presented plans and illustrations and frther xpPtaned the Consortium's intent and conceptual overv9ew of theSpecificmprehensive Con lair.ed that 0C Specific. He showed,plt hotographsaof a .stree scape scene to Trough the use of layering. 24th Street, in.. grading, on the ite would be placed where people could see it on a illustrate the type of image that they hoped to create along sisich he g _ day to day basis. roect. He Next Mr. Harris focused on the conceptual ro osed Involves 1c,le,ling the site internally plans for the "Crest p J stated the grading concept p while taking up the grades in greenbelt paseoi a,., along streets in order to create open space amenities. He discussed techniques of usinthlandscaping 2 edtme'nntt of create the appearance of contouring the land. In adfltion, the central pas was disrrl s o'10U feet. s ction ,Additional of y,MreOHarrisddiscussed slope heights of between proposed internal tract treatments including landscaping between homes and on corner lots. ite Mr. sign Harris then Laexi He stated that they fhave attampted the ala locateemuch pr©posed by Lasdms of the golf in the p55jbj�, wh21e concentrating areas of the site and residential developnt *o natural terrain a p the south on a;proximatelY 10,000 square foot lots. senttt des+ri4irg Kent '.�illips r concept Landmark Land drtfie n condetti wed the lie stated thatitheon i re goal is to the teva nice create a nee viewshed and to protect the hills as much as possible_., ch as Chairman McNiel �ir:t rJecte possible, and that the goal is to mirrimtize grading a.d create , mu possible, use the natural- terrain as Bauch as aesthetically pleasing viewscapes. Mr. Phillipsf water the re actions have been taken.in Commissioner .olstoy asked the plan to protect the sou -�_ August 30, 1989.' planning Llomnission Minutes Mr. Phillips responded that thay did not yet 1,ave the final biological report, but he believed the environ-mental consultant would submit it by September` 8, 1989. Mr. Harris stated that the Consortium would prefer 0 at the Specific Plan show proposed conceptual lot designs, recognizing that standards-shown this evening oust be implemented and if no::, then the conceptual design could not be built. Chairman McNiel expressed concern that specific criteria are needed to (insure the City that the;specific items discussec+. become reality. Mr. 'Harris ;stated he felt that there]Would be ad:;Juate prgte_,tAon because there will be a site plan and cross section contts :red i�: WSpecific-Plan. If a new property owner should choose to ,change the co6ept, the project would then have to go through the review.proC`ess again. al Chairman McNiel indicated that normally,the. City sets minimum standards. He felt that .the Ordinance should be as rigid :as: possible, and, that the Variance process .is available when there are special circumstances. with .adequate ,iustific ition. Mr. Dilorio stated that he disagreed that the purpose of the `Hillside vrdinan:e should be to reduce grading. He expressed concern that the proposed concepts, such as; a greenbelt 'paseos and clustering would,,r,ht be possible under the proposed Hillside Ordinance standards. Pe did agar that there may be room to 'tighten the standards contained in the proposed Specific=Plan,.., Mr. Harris commented that the plan should be designed to implement site specific design, rather than dev0eo ng restrictive standards which give flexibility, only to the .City to later make deteminations about relaxing the_ standards. He indicated that they would be willing to write-stand ards to implement the -concepts proposed; tonight, bu" ;that he did not want'.his hands tied.' Chairman McNiel responded that he felt that is the reason for the Variance process. Mr, Dilorio interjected` that the, Hi'llsidp. Ordinance looks at the issue straight from a planning perspective and he felt. the method the Consortium proposed is the best way, although it may need to be tightened up. Mr. Dilorio.stated that the Hillside Development Ordinance will insult in a loss of units which will affect economics. In addition, he indicated that any annexations' which have occurred in the City were a result of the fact that developers were able to`get more units in :ihe City than the County. ; He indicated that was 'rnt the case with this project. He stated the Consortium) is willing to create a better project, but tLe densities that can be achieved in the County have to be achieved in the Citys i Richard Douglas of Landmark Land indicated that the Hillside .Ordinance as � proposed is riot flexible enough to alloW their conceptual design, PlanningL Commis or. Minutes -3 August :30i 1,989 " s.j Paul Taylor of Ett_.anda Heights indicated that her would run into problems if the Ordinance were adopted and they would not be able to develop.as they had nl anned. Chairman McNiel requested that La-_-y. Henderson discuss those areas where there, may be specific areas .of conflict. Larry Henderson, Principal . Planner, replied that staff had one in--depth' meeting with the Consortium-meirbers -+o discuss this issue before writing the staff report, and that the appe�dix' 'f the report contained staffs analysis of the Specific Plan grading sexton. Additionally; he indicated that"when copies of the proposed ordinance were sent to the Consortium members, staff had specifically requested that they quantify and qualify those areas where V the Ordinance may not'work with the,plan. As of yet, that information_had not been articulated to staff. He stated that It is still staffs;position that there is enough flexibility in the proposed Ordinance to take into account special circumstances because the Ordinance is r^t all "shalls", that it does contain 'shoulds", and that there are places were_,t talks about consideration of individual circumstances. Additionally, Mr. Henderson indicatedi that much" of the flexibility had been added at the request of the Commissioners',, as theyW` realized that there may be cases where the City would want to allow someone to exceed the standards' in order to achieve some other specific quality. Mr. Henderson stated that he had heard concern about the following specific issues: 1) density reductions, based on the. slope analysis and 2) the use,of stepped foundations, both north and south of the Edison corridor where there are ^fight (8) percent geades. He mentioned that the last item was,added at the Commission's suggestion in order to give them the flexibility to request alternative designs when reviewing production house designs. Mr. DiIorio was concerned about relying on the "shoulds`" which would require staff to make;-judgment calls. He'stated he feltthat as thr. tentative tract process progresses, the ability to be subjective can be overwhelming, He suggested that perhaps these judgment callo should be:referred to the City Council because. one of the deal points the Consortium asks, regardless of anything else, is that the density that is'allowed in the County be allowed in the City. Commissioner 91akesleyc stated he felt that he'rWould need more information about the exact problems the Consortium has with the proposed Hillside Development Ordinance. He liked the paseo concept and concentrating slopes in public areas. He said generally, he did not favr,,*' massive grading, but in sew of the alluvial areas he did not sea a lot of character to be preserved and that the ,proposed concepts could, create the type of community tint woul'o be an asset. As a result, he supported some of the things the Consortium was proposing. Cc.%oissioner Chitiea indicated that the paseo concept is interesting and that perhaps., wording could be added to the proposed,.Ordinance to allow the ��seo concept within'specif3c.parameters, without sigoificant`ly changing the intent and bulk of the Ordinance. ,She indicated' that she is uncomfortable with the Planning Commission Minutes -4- August 30, $9$9 idea of the review on a case-by-case basis; that the idea is to come.,up with t Plan that will apply to everybody. She felt when :t is broken down on .a tract-by-tract basis, the City loses,the concept behind a Specific Plan and it might possibly damage the Hillside Ordinance. Commissioner ;ioi`,toy added that he`would like''to see a Specific Plan for this area. Additionarly, he liked the Hillside Ordina.nc!s and felt that it could be modified to fit specific circumstances identified by the Consortium. ie stated that one benefit of`a Specific Plan is that it p;es'ents alternatives, hopefully in a manner that all property ;owners- can Work with. Commissioner Tolstoy also indicated that he would not .want to ;see the definition of hillside changed from eight'(8)�percent.to ter,'.(10) percent Commissioner Chitiea concurred.- At this point, Mr. .Harris distributed copies of a second slope analysis map indicating the approximate ioI ion of the eight` (8) percent slope,line. Mr. Henderson expressed concern that the determination of the eight {ga percent slope;line did not ;' ear to fit the contours ;shown on the underlying base map. Ray Allard of Fuscoe, Williams, Lindgren` and Short indicated that the eight (8) percent line was based on new topographic information and that the 1USGS base map was ;lust for references Chairman McNiel stated that he felt that the proposed Hillside Ordinance is acceptable. He expressed concern that . there shou'lo`,' not be too many opportunities to allow for too much openness, in the Ordinance::-, He felt that either a separate document or an appendix, specific to the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, could-be created based on the analysis .and alternatives raised by the Consortium. +, Mr. OiIorio suggested the possibility of two steps. First, that the ; Consortium sit down and '�i:�?re_ the. proposed Ordinance. and make suogestions regarding those specific areas that they feel are necessary to make`the plan work. Secondly, that the Planning Commission review the results and try to reach a determination. SFr. Henderson resp attempted to inc!ronded that in formulating 'the proposed''-urd.inanc ey 4 f= p porate concepts with regard to the community plan, but that staff also tried to incorporate those concerns--end comments raised by the Planning Commission., He stated that he did not want the Consortium niembers.`to get the impression that staff ignor` d the Specific Plan. Mr. Harris indicated that while he felt the heart may have been there, that the standards are defensive in posture, Additionally, he indicated'that. rather than going down a checklist, a planned community sh+.uld 'be comprehensive. He felt that the plan, as set up, creates an ou'tstandig f Al fraak:worL He voiced concern that if they have to use the Hillside standards, it will involve a reorganization of .the entire framewtork of the plan. He Planning Commission Minutes -5- August 30, 1989 fJ �/l indicated to the Manning Commission that he would like to hear specific: concerns or ideas about tree concepts proposed tonight. t Chairman McKie] stateil that the Planning Commission generally did not have any objection to the concepts proposed. However; he indicated that since the Consortiuq members are,mocve;familiar with the site, that they identify the .specific ,)roblems rather, than having, the Planning Commission try to identify' the proble03. Additionally,,Chairman' McNiel s'cated that the Consortium needs °r to deal with the Hiliside Ordinance. He suggested that the Consortium review the prop osed.Ord inance and present alternatives for those areas'of concern. Commissioner Blakesley expressed concern that it 'sound d as i'f``the Consortium was suggesting that the Ci,}y set: Hillside 'Ordinance aside, allow the developers to design as they'go along, that all should work together, and that it will all be fine. He indicated that he did not feel comfortable with an approach which is that unstructured. Mr. DiPorio interjected lihat they will take a shot at reviewing the Ordinance, suggest the changes they feel necessary, and work with staff to try and reach a Conclusion. Mr. Douglas asked the Planning Commission if there was an acceptance of what their had seen tonight. Chairman McNiel indicated that the Planning Commission had. not offered any negative comments. Commissioner Chitiea 'interjected that she could not say that the Oak= Summit Plan was acceptable. Mr. Douglas stated that they were referring to the grading concepts only. Commissioner Chitiea stated' that as mentioned earlier:by staff, she agrees that there should be both landscaping and cantour grading required. C;Lairman McNiel asked if staff was comfortable with the directio!i that the prtipsed Ordinance is acceptable to the degree' that it applies to Rancho Cuca:longa, but that upon further review there may be some modifications in refcra'nce to the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. •s..J Mre�au tr. Ne;berbn ptCY a4-a a aFF nra.ileda .LF4iic. lit it It�f C - Commiss4on. He indicated that staff feels that there may be room to fine tune the doc ffent to allow a greater comfort level for the Consortium while articulating in givater detail what the Planning Commission is trying to accomplish. Mr. Henderson stated that a'realistic look at L time frame for submittal and review of the revisions would be necessary. He indicated that Jess Harris had mentioned that he could have a revised document to staff withiti two weeks. :As a result, because of required scheduling and conflicts with prior meetings, a' second_workthop wouldrprpbably`not occur until ttie `first week of October. Planning Commission Minutes -6- August 30, 1989 n Russ Maguire, 'City Engineer,• stated that he would like to add that the Engineerng Division has concerns ,with the proposed street grades 'due to ,maintenance problems. :He did riot feel that exceptions to the standards 'should be:.automatic. Commissioner Chitiea indicated that the quality of the landscape material and its 'maintenance is of significant concern to the City. ,She stated she'`did not want to see. street grading- problems buili into, a project and expressed her opposition t�� .private;gated communities, as problems in a gated, cacimunity often become problems of the Nttl,I. Mr. Buller adde ;;that carefu'! plant 'material selection is important,'ana. mist take into account the. wind problem in fte area. Mr. DiIorio stated„hat the Consortium would work with -staff and that he hoped; Mr. Henderson eould's-�get then back to the Planning' Commission as soon as possible. ADJOURNMENT 1K The meeting ad,;ourt)-ed at 7:,.45 P.M. ;t Respectfuiiy,submitted, Brad B®r. Secretary tt�.. _.. if 9� fr .fj It Planning Consnission�,Ridutes -7— August .30, 1.989 r'�' @@!! r t i —RECEIVED— OCT 41969 CRA1rTPR V.1I .. ETIWANDA NtaR9'A"Gl2ADI�G � DEVE .OPMENT GVLATIONS (Gbaage is proposed to 10reding Developm"t s Uhtionsw*0 Me document deals wlfb arias below,grsdes conrsldered Hillside.) $cctlon.�7.11.010 Pntpose an_ Intent' 71 ese tegutadons are intend^d u=fuAer implement and define the goals and objectivin of the General Plan,to minimize feets of gr�digg anti to provide 4"or the sa.�ety!t tacd. bencfit 441" t�welfare of the c 2izon�s of Rancho Ci►cemcnp while allomv "for rmonabL I,,I velopment of land,z eatpmsW throigh tH folltrviag purposes; v.= A. Pmvcde specif,gtaidetfines fordcvelop Dent i 3sisla to tn#nitttize the rdvaw tar�aacts of gn3ding and:!o promote IIha goals and objectives of 4he City of Rdndo Ctat amonga s GeneralIait ages Space,' onervatiott,and 13ign :lem ;and, (Change is.proposed as flit d©er�me��efeelti�n+i'tb areas_ bePo�,gtrs�iea ' conridered.Fl"3IJ$ldr.} B, Felaintain an eaviiantnental:equiUbripta consistentw3+st a iztiimg vegetation,w dlift, toils,Scologyj slopes,and draUge ttettts,snd:3o;jreatrve aawd toby aat�l. nic chain tet, Including aftles, canyons, creeks, lceolla, mck ottIItrapa,and, ridgeliars Whenever 14MMlc;ntiatd, C. Ptcftrvt an4 gsa#stain es3sting avlldIifs thtoogh the teuntion of tdg 9 icint tatuxil lobitat~tad, D Ettectirsgc vraer coassrn+mtion aad. fer ;and, E.' Avold development that would result in fft flood;slide,cmdon� tits zafcty ;and, F. Limit the eatemt of�g d aitatati sd et sttragt ties l vt . tat 1A lbt ate tinuo ftodble design and ittaiosraliea eat o dit►g logs,.clustaft,ford :i�,4a G. Avtald t1aY t^Stdtle:rrPtich eat fireCRAcity of the ax 1 .taf *Web CM ly'be pTaWded and that geneite 7traff€6 i 'i—ft atewtva, StIft 1A t.',E tect amw,and, Hi Encoutatt a dev:pmIeatts wbich�amble,e wdwaWad� , o€ rt EXH9E1i' ae�ndr 14 675 acre prayserve has been provided within ''Rtiwand ItTnrth specific flan for these purposes.% 1. Preserve and/or introduce plant material to protect slopes.frotn Boil ema;on and slippage, , tai imize;fire bazasd,and to minimize-the Wining;ZdefbmwtionofthenaivaffiITass pe and, (Deleffen is made As flood control,proleets will be cbena:'ng esturap wsteisPed areas gad certain, development propaosals red:!xect � watembeds.) K. Limit&r-imoact oaf atbpes on iWacent developed` pcopeaties. (This limits development ola eomprehcaasive,IntegratedAfasterPlan.) r> Section 17.i 1.020 Review Procedures AN projects within a hillside area(84 1096 slope or> ter)shall be nbjert to Grading Committee review with approval by City stag,the City Piatatt—wcr P - The northern SCL corridor it r logical dividing line between'Allfaide and can-h111side high is sea orally locmted at thi\,1696 padlent axes. t A. Chy,Stan er Re ew.The Ciry plaauat a5a1t revi�snit site.wetr�liopnteti. application%;and altalt impost:cWhIons deemed appropriate wbM tam of More of tbo faitowingnstivides am proposed- paWbutlew t3 iif em icent(iS�fa}oa alt or part gf the devctoptd prtia+,m®fit ttb site,or osa less stesp lead��lclt:away be ssft'�tcd by tins ef'gxctgtet slope fa&,fist pa�Y betweat arad��ntto ixdit3:de), if 2. x i {Ali ofJfdfw"&XbsO will exceed tfi eced(i k-1 . 3. ff (All of t£wwda Nook wiltexcood'ttiis dUfa .) B. pine i ne ftn*g CMMIUM I&IttiSt ~"�tt� ,develagm�t AWL lis�t3cers,aad#taped ca�itiomr �l trg�pr�ti� , of�e titac t4 _` 0 1� 1. , Natural slopes equal to or greater than 13 percent on all or par-of the developed portice ai'asubject site, . (AllOf`Lotlwarada 1PTortL will eaccred ibis)c,"ditaotr.) 3 Persians e :01 to alp:AMMM ems. (AiJ(ofit r-;"nd4 North will a;csed,iliis casBl�art.j 4. p ny excavation or fill which wjP,cnroach onto or alter a natural drainage channel or watercourse. JShoulrl be probibited unless Alternate drainage is provided.), a } 3. Any other proposal xeferred to the Planning Commission by the Grading Comm;",error City Planner. C. ce't' -projects which•are limited in scope(e.g.,additions to existing structures and/or cowtuctson a accessa y structures less than 250 square fleet aacl an slppcs less than 20%) or poalslspas-require only staff'level mview and approvid. However,projects which require grading of fiat;tuess,such as antis caurtr,riding rings,etc.,in billsider,�reas shall'be reviewed by the City Planer. (The addidiortol is mddc to allowregidents-to build pools/apas, etc., Without Complez review process.) D. -If ambiguity arises conceml;,*interpretation of the Provisions of this secilOn,it sha1 be reviewed by the City#sinner to determine compliance with the provisions contained within this section or he or she may refer it to the Plannin Cbamisdoa. Section 17.11.030 Application Filing Regtrltements A. Natural features trap,which shall identify all existing'slope banki-Tiftelines, canyorts,ruaturml'drainagEcaurs�,Fe8eRa11y teBo btu;w•;�.;•..,,�ye`��ea, on grand. rgp� .o:rrtt pilings,and eatat#rtg v htt'r.ALo depicW mall be la�dslidsa}snd other.exlstingrgeologic;r 2tirds. (T'1te 4 -1re iteaae will he ideaBif3ed or: an esistlog Features map' or the Speta c Plan area to claelfy what eta eoagiderve mportaiat roc&;out.cgiapplo ,•eft:.) A caNceaatar l thing plan at F%400; or 11-20Q'aa+1e oar. ersites as d6leraticcrd by the City dr€xnncp which gall show buck.fsteet With rrspyct to d10 c*gcepts Tbls abaft be rcvlctred by stai>'asd.w,hen dceaed acceptable, .bccoaee the,, bases to prepam the preliarisarr gradlag plea. (TAM Us sect'stop that is imteie�ded e)net a grxdl concept prior to a pprallmiaary, grading plan'ta+bieb regelrgv a high level of dats3l.) 3 01 Ask B. Apreliminary grading plan at 1'°-40'scale,which shall include the following items in addition to those required as part of the Submittal Requirement Cbecklist: 1. A'legend with appropriate symbols,which 4hould include,but trot be limited to the following items, top of wall,top oi'caio,high Vaint,low point,elevation of significant trees,spot elevations, ad s elevations and change in direction of drainage. Oiarii ad floor elevation# are premature at this point a property owner=FY choose to prepare sab:'vislon maps only and prepare arclr?jecmprr later.) 2. . {T�is trtap, required at building plan checJr by the builaiting depsrtanetat, is scot accessary wbea Iteatas its lT JJ.026/2 sold'3 arc deleted. 3. Contours shall be shown for existing 4md nettatal land con4ldow andf propfttd work. Existing contours 00V be&.4,;Dated whit aslthetra died line eir screened Jinv*ith every fifth contourderkee,and proposed contours aludl''be depicted as above except with a solid right line. Contouam shall be shown according to the following schedule: fScrecacd lines Is common industry standard.) r ; �s nPatrIRM 8 Cereal fa Feat Ldd,�aea1 Siooe tCatust l►Isar �!i�11aa1�8f , 096 4w4us-to 19.9% - 1"J P C. A co=ut3ai draloge,and flood txatrof Ailitdes ma A �ft gSIW ftml'statea IkIlit or the purposemitts t - tMad fsi awtida (17.06.10 R.2). Fat the Atope.taap;the VVlka tt t M ataw MAP oft3®tih�sscs s�p by a Onto- dt'rlst t rail a of Mtt yorw ttvrs AaIlb a tasm9e®f tt t�cte (1) b 100 and a c tttur fart vm6 flows atom ,. t tad t�tt� taa40b®f alte` lox; es. (!aril' Is paa►vmel®d ad con Almdam la�tttat mew taatlgat' Dglincate slope binds in the range of zero(Q)a to- a }ttp to,ten ,mine point ninety-nine f9.99j=1�gsrceat,ten tlt7)u,�to€�3��fotatdeen x point vinery--vine(14.99)percent,fik cen(I p tot 68e y 0)twenty-nine l,t poi.."ninety-nine(29.99,1 percent, tr ,, d thirty(3Q)percentor grtetr T&e slope analysis tatap shall include,ar b .xccompanie bye a tabulation of the•land 3 area is each 316pf6 category specified in acres. The enact method for computiAg the 'percent slope and am by percent slope category should be sui3ld tly descril-d and presented so th--c a,review can be readily made f With W119:1de 11 on-lihiside derived by 104G;this is appropriate. E. " A geologic and soils report,prepared by n&a"mv4d a geologysoils engineering firm and in sufficient detail to sabstantlate and st M&4 the design conceptsgresented in the application€s subtfil ed. . • ,6 taaol� t� � . � e� q. (Dele,tien Mode as these itsms are covered iti Me E.P'R.) F. A s6te went of conditions for ultimate ownership and maintenance of aU parts of the development including streets,strus ures and 6*space. ° ate. {31�ia atateOetst Weats't ptvv flexibility needed on ra ca ow type.home tract$,a specifit;,psteht,;.diPives, etc,, won't be know.m until each dot owner bi an are d tceet to ef�!Sun as buildiag.) H. The following iaa item;may be requited if determined netewty by the Grading Commcttea, City Planner or PlAnuing.Commission Wald in the analysis of the proposed project,to illtts=e existing or p coad dow of both: f 2. Aliwof2igstyvicwamily or Ber ta-sectiona j 3 I 'opa'grh;bread zodcl , are molt pta^' -a1'for large I depelap a;wa �rf'ether tesbr�-`-- p i s too 0 1�ndec� Grp&� s see , �i11 br, Me mtoat},de itfre tm excribiagw ward big a�vditlovs. 4cetion 17,11.4040 U11nations I - R,Ri APICI •The cutt3agaad t111it of a ate wlc�does asst rc�rirr she curt or ,port of ftrtii y BORROW-Earth material acquired front an W4ite or anoo-sitelocation for the use in grading on a site. COh.`,OUR-Aline drawn on a plan which connects all points of c kt.^iY. �ele�a CONTOUR GRADING -A grading concept desipud to result in earth forms which resemble natural terrain characteristics. Horizontal and,vertical curvet variations are.often used for slope banks. Contour grading toes not tiecessatlly minim1w the:%mount of cut and fill occurring. CUT-The meehan7-,Wremoval ofearth material. DAYLIGHT LINE-The line between grand natural terrain drawn liyyconnecting th*' paints wherecontouFs meet con7puts. ELEVATION-Iielght usually in feet above sea level, EROSION-The process by which the:solid and cog:components of*earth's crust are, worn away and remr`ned from one place to'snotberby auroral forces ma,o as Grind and aster. EXPORT-Excess earth if tedal that is removed from a gmdittgproject Gjd deposited off. site. FILL A deposit of earth placed byarMciai means. FINISH GRADE-The fuml grade of the site which caonfotras lathe Approved plan. GRADING-To bring an e�ititing sonic=to a designed form by etcavating,andflling, operztiviz- HILLSIDE Refers to a parcel of Lead or detlnable porden t:----of with 4-rise or fall of t.9%)teas 00%)Cercentor enger (See Section i7.11.020 for ttationale.) KNOLL-A rtmll round hM or me" MASS GRADING-The pcoca=ofpat aadlor taysclng maoatheplace of land. MINWAL GRMi,XG-A vift cticept ft4atd to mitri w- led tg. Allows the movement of earth for projects such ns in$vlcha ba., fauatdmtiozclt driveways,local roads and utility extxvatlon, Ttic "a' With rotttdt conforu ft dogely to 011tum co=%-s,cm with structum WAS Milt aambud tom. tt - if Si f y 1{ `I NATURAL SLOPE-A slope which is not man-made. A natural slop*muy rexa3n natural vegetation during adjacent:grading operations or it may be partielly or completely removed and replanted. PAD,LEVEL-A level at^ta created by grading to accommodate development. i PAD, SLOPING- Rberr-lot area is tilted in dir°°cdon of natural slope. PROMINENT RMG;d-A ridge icri.hill location as identified in ltiwxnd a Worth Specific Plan eh4r�w' l-at-tea " F_ (This information vilir he iscladed in Edwan41Varth Specific plan.) ' 1 AML dwohm"cap w.ni'iCi' r .toalyt!pe�4wtt A� refer dsOi�#t •— .�\• Ofh N dLw64Rasa . w NOR. ..rout. ta!xo�� RWE•A loag,==Wl tacaspicu=etevjdW of knr& L AR•A W,dble cut in a hillside or ridge with a slope Staw dmw 1-W:I in wkch sill topoll hu bow removed and vegetationwM be u=Se to estsblidt itself alter a a odfimt period of time(3 yem). t 7 t n � Yt J2 Q .Cd 1` 3�y y.w'r * t u 1;* �r tK��R .X .j � a*•a ttr. x-x 7777 t� t'��`� ar►a ¢ xk ,� r �':'m �. _rS ,r,�..a. �"`� �� .,fir �"^ ��- ' t Y ) Section 17,11.050 PdilWdc� ee#gaati si+ a� Sllf �9612'arura�s.` * s ' 4 44?or less P6?s is aot$.lafilisidr condition.G.adiag Ati =hvcn&nm' fully ded ou, ter lwzwl is r� mcapta6l�. ° 2 DevelbpnWit%iwle p- ing£s xsthdaed in Qs as a.k� #cat d#vis#oo .:6047c'3'- trcF a1) i��rsrdbezYy � eras Eeae a gya.t11R0I. e,ItA9-7c1 corrtdc�&�nes a, pertinent to fttain na taictcr. , 10121 dgjirtura s Tbis statemepfis�,p3 be4wtec: lllsidr blfl$tTcnall, tic.,o€�ar.' ,' ddd b�aildl '. a®a�-831r�de. sltes3 pernri.ed,hes cYKt�,` Que 'i tch�s A aontaar�dln�,c�trwblard singes, • ov RQS1S silty 1�' a 'gd Idae n't Der' 4rll�y:psodu b�tte'scrittti'caei�,pa�t�rult�sB�I��rail#n8q Is dassklo'aclsicvc csaek3t',stacle as pesaQ d$se$rxbeits, Fc. �'p tIt ievaj ri �3tsstugen® aaeded r aIevc m t_ �ar� d ,'• add n for 'sgaeaiisy e��'��F � � . d m� unlyjR�0'W t,"ble rur % d Is mot a,*vPflato Ior&dsr,e R► Isheaudcd'tbst .mar ra scatb the Vortberly SCE coni f6sm{109 qjr ti Je�ajr�dltcta� �`�Il�aveu'�e��br j I +gat V 'ldfef t• � beMw -.0 r a n d lls t- fl le oatd, �# 10ydit btetrfi. to or cg�x� iseess. . . } r� n. 3 S I Ei to i4.9 Tms is a hiiisi6e ronditian. Spexi�l hails de 'architectutat snd design sechniquc�' bo required in this zone.;;- ale;ss a$fig gl�?n presWdes 4cctfrl asi a tcaatgresioir bxte�ma3ae ffrerblJclts/osea aptsce.aereas, the b araitc&,^Afl pmtoty RF bd''eggired = land►,oetrs by tt cingt techttie1ues sucha:tdtor ns stern ersiis,sjac'iiza5 , ;ovel dundatie+ , c11��of1ng" `.: v b,UfrAteil io no A 15 to 9.9 ; De�lopmenrtV.0 tthis' o the t}ie lest' t 11y;ho auieitt slq�"A, araii'then only where it eaa be shown that Law environmental and setetic ersa be:, minimized..`(As C&t4j ona iz egG',3� praa3xtenld�ea Ord irla88ifr� crj of the,Specific rua-i-tffe of lalcu lob,variable setbsq s snit vadatkbutldin$ atc19 uctumi techniq►es s. 6 tligte¢ped,or jib frwndations are eit eda %mcaires ahelt'b'leaa` w th the natatzd environnicaf dtt+ta 24t'i,ed so ni kterisis,and colors. Itnagbd'rf craft sad rcndantxs isItobexelnt a t*faUowisg isl contazars,or using gradegarsttorts,` 718 id over Iiis is sn etecessiva att>pe csv itits�a i l devcio�nsnt is ptohtbited. ' mg!es a;Y 'j is Maria daps cateS(;_IM f:i $ ibFta'o ibeg following ��;e beery bccs delct6d' I i eBnt aatlal be the to&. For ail'jl,ptc1pared Wed oa°gtatteffie®ta Alla P�stca! t a taa ! glue" �bds c�a �r lad Red u me:rrnly';F B" f` k� 1l y� S/ •� ,9 1,�. ��' { )`� Ili y33 � • Arzo r. �iy.�m�"tfy� � C Wm" l • NOT IM cemwmAww e w `�J E AIS sr"s a 10% �y moo waam Note. a 11 cAbibift that am to ala I'm tea docameat sieve *am. =d�fm tbik'10®9 Mist to'a�aq r�a�aa�w�dlacaa tea. Abe ®� t§at,-M above, dl sudl®s ezblblis SAO mast' vocar depiading sus oppeclfic alto. dleloaa�daei obJazdtMes. sayifi "aat tlilas, l a�+t 81100 rope* fleliit� h+ 1: 1 r i t'j�� r.r .r i� Section 17.11.060 Gvldeli=7, These Gm4ing 1>Mopment Guidelines ate Intended t®:.fadlii` to flue sate development of sipi(kat hii4ides (ION amd Orreator)riJactlWA in Sk 37. 010—E. W M to bar Strict_ ' 'u .to pmdaz dbudw is eat sidt is to xli jp, Asia is a t r�dccats 4vi€�nal firma or _ of in ahillsideaees; m i�i E �the� i _ the netuta bad fnat tb t tips . n th seetkn. A. OS MAY"Ved of w lcitY s fill d beatswam"60 cmtm ofdtes J, � al (sil Ealribirx.bave beon dch-ted as tbey can be r�risF�16prOted Cont ur [�d"ag is viable in a lai�(iarea but not,within mi iadividatal ain�le' ot. ^;l 1 1 d 7`^1 �t dw B. Mimuractwed's] u apes,either cut or fil?�adjartnt:ta r02dw�myr;maybe gr2dea3h WAY sbae aii uyadUiitliig appearance at thagraded'p1attt)cprouide �shlbittt,brve'been del!.'ted as�ice 3D Lrllaide'�re�s�d x�a�y,-,.:kdeairsblc; � to hsve a raid er»ss tbrouil a small 31�to.Prastlt�t�t�ees6,fih r7eCts>i,.M . .� area f tbdii otre ta'r wired�;3e aQp of 8� " dIF��s« a.e,9 mlash, wbeream'It f dii�Faderl.ar Z l,Ba dayli�lat 5efore reacB.xc�tr. will g�sj e�`, ifte h!Yl tpp would-be presarved. � � �- l� 'I Cl I �1 1..4 t n , x, r r t C. Where cut or fill wttdit ons are.created,slopes may bd vtdr4id rathet-ffian le:�at constant"angle ,. or,wh.ch cremtea an Uniatural, rlgi3, w8aa`�.'„iW 6ppi'.w it is srtufscitursd hzfffht EPP?..]ll iao less stable than a tnmaufactured�oaaeour ,l'Blop�;1}�i�rs A.i41n etatemeat is. +etec�_ Stability roquiremtats will be"defier lased Fly the. zaaril 'cagincen nic i2temt of Gals psrograph is alresdy cvr cred In :he 1 eon!'oar gsadirt$eseceio� nasal,should'P�e c asolidated"ax is fitted' The czh35lt suggcso 3r1 Aso typical slope. L^ i; VARY SLOPES, . r !c� I' � •9 55 - a "fl i t /r D. The angle of any graded tlope may be,gmduditty adjusted to.the angle of the aaturai terrain. The comment is acceptable;'however, these two eshib;ts hsvp been deleted. The exhibits suggest grsding will occur on Oexi9ting rtetrolppmsa 'Which it.inappropriate. also both. exhibits Infer thst s�istin�di�ieage devices occur., his seems eetrelateto 4,11e�ftftg:of the starrcmeat and is subject to confusion byztra reader. Etc4stl { m. materts grade gatf' drrag Att m wade mi;a tea• appMaknateIttrd .. 4 utiMon bma fee pftiltrlw MA r L > �. r Ay `+ f, Sf E. When possible,dMi IVl ao�s brow ditches ahouldbepiacrA in iess visibIc. lomtions,and more importantly,may receive a naturalizing treatment including Mk,colorad concrete,or retard,:nt finish concrete (exposed agsrgate) and/or landscaping, so that the structure appears as en integntl part,o -the f enviroamen4: Ir,all cues,AC or.concrete liner shall.be wised 6iddition to a rratti►raliziiapureatment" ,�'� (TA& term deaidagc�vhanncl does zocep zic)ate with ti`e,sect�4�.tx�; cirange"is iadleated to broom dtic es:y ativa rock i�i bits A A eharatc€eristics, exposed sgregste has beeb su ifitd�cd rretarda t ' finish)) ' p��,�q�+e� _ g� yp�a _ !� NA URAUZ °�d lei+ i _ S Encouti' ; Js�of colored concrete or retardant t7nish concrete ` = 1t do j.ttd/orI"dsrAPiug 1 r� Discouraged Ism&Z at Onva"am I ff 6 t _ 'I h ? - t .f I It Ir B lreetfcat wftbia fadl w'd aast Jot c-t°vnaoar grading. App�raf riaate cQ�faur gig deg corrce "Ar Irat #.ou mr' ased , above in.fx m R ind,C. two*"lKw(tontd vrct aolt�pat �� ' AM Iles �snsipu®tmn _ _ fl - I r� stand"'.aadvmm � 1. .. �,• �., G. L`egign of building sites sboulu be sensttive to the natural terrain;Structures tansy be lcmtad in such,,a way us to tninimIzo necessary grading and to pt"erve natural features such as proritinent knolls or ridgelines. > Cti This statement ia'Acceptable;bowdvet, Me exhibit is 4iletc&'Tbs top ezltabit implies $beer*is fig gradin&at all that is acceptable while the lower exhibit implles no gradingis permitted. The reality,its thate vombima aog of the two is likely. 8xbibits such as tb?a edea les� to ntisinserpretatiot` r • q w,i d � , THIS j ; M t V� q f. NOT THIS ` r_ j . 111 20 r, <s II. &�c�rAr.;;lieseld-be-E.;:�#'i,*133'- lds�-t- ea-�sbst Rc�altia-tl�a ,y3 -ra€acltw-rx.9 It may-not atlways be practical to achfr- this dondition,'whit h is high'ry xAjcg�tBve;o begin With. It hao been'Otaitted. ; I. Proj*ll may incorporate:clu tering variable setbacks,multiple orientations and other s` site planning techniques to'pres6s e'opea spaces,protect iptural features and oiler views to tesideats, j (The-whibit does not jiatch the statement,i.e., vazixble sabacka.1 l , Cknow r «, F%Of en.:C.-AI&.."sum:!ltlopom �ra++wcases r / ��tlrAti f IK- 6 �rne vas tiswe liaiipr 21 �f G t �tegspeet t aiion p �A�so lte�a.fir�ash�'1��ra as sra�Ape�&��ar� 8��g�a�a 84 �' aft . ' hen affid rslosaeed,to the sactfos am aaeftedum; 22 � r_ T' :l.nr�e Too0-smaY6ana ra pss "ho aw"a.$topo HQ;q vt ff ngt ir Max-to 69,enfk4-*stl Sol Of Wge asefaeaa �, ,- • �I �q -F' hl f. `a`@ w aid 1 r `,l t1 23 r' Thl r Not th ........ 24, i fi t ti ; Ca . t (This is Soo aubj� alv01, {le'e, ,criteria xre..00,0 d here.} L. In arras or steii.:erYirrain (20% vou.,vid saers ^ taonilaraoutn aire�ts, (uii eas ihere`iffi fe,��3blo alS r�aSJve}t� iast 0 •, should£Ycnt ota rasU`wes streets os�'�auld be gfatt�d to foUnw the ssuza3"tuatara. M. Where possil?�,$*ea designed with mriuSaaiured slopes located on the uphi;'$,sac"rc ofstmctures,thereby,oidirig the slope hehar.1 the setuctumt. E + Leo a��sose�t�ws at�drripeoas Aft seep. 1 l per. . Ellcouraged .Ow d l�a 6RUrc RB%A&mm, of vWW im may bminimimed by tlty:t6mbined Wo of to 'Pt rsate a ! *3:, eau of spa e a r and tudu&*ofog s: i *I i. 1.= Utilize landronit p�anting in order to ereate a natural appearanceand proviite e ` nsa of privacy., 2. Rtduce tbt.impact ofgrading and resUlting retaining wails by caemtitig visual interest A itit terraced uAls',landscapi4k and by v crying twdwu and patterrt of 3, Nftc a radjaeent to;b steep blliside,minim' &ding for the r6ad mrid�l�t•t�t " `� wag,� rlth a;transition to a natural landscape and tr my he utiHizeil to prt villa an and itioro 6courikged 4 Oft**of etawont OevWa. it��®idttdg�� 4 We 4w sew l� amp� ae.t+iv m Ift Oft fib; k.. r 4.s A split roadway increases the amount of landscaping and the median may be - ussd to handle°drainage. _v Discouraged , Ehcouraged PA 44tr Cut Idatstuea!rdga co, i�ton $tiros natwr� >a Cut.alope 7elav at ttta t11. tntq hti&tdo. try iiasE�rsB �� aft®Oit,atOp�O Knob remaAlr rag AMWA asts0 ffino8s tf@no Y eaa4 ,i "+ 9�a1i stem!gre". f i ,, , TO atw fte p%nts to oeta9aaersd tit to', amttitll�t "� w O. 1priviways which serve toe than one parcel are encouraged as method of tciog unnecemary grading,pavifsg,and site dismrbanLc. 28 i I f i f r l r; P. a dfo lantin' should be used to soften slo.es raduce: N tural.lan rm p ,� n >r , impact:of development on steep slopes or.ridgeiines,and provide erosion control. ` .9:a nd Pis"" Encouraged .o i Ouraged LId'P�y�ffif'viseael p'Sasata lis d� s j� !r i Q. Walls and fences may,be used to define a lease of place and create an attractive appearance. Rowever;walls should not dombate a view and their height should`a limited adjacent;to a street,trail or within a re it yza Terracing and exfensive landscaping can"help to reduce At effective bulk. In addition,street front walls should incorporate varying design.n*tIA-, mate'ritsls auel open"view fearing is encouraged. R. Trails are an integta Pail of at hillside area-and provide recreation areas'for ;&&,,I grian,hik au"d bi g. Thsy cahl also function as ameans to take up grade orto ra�vey'daainagc. In hillside areas,it may not always be necessary to provide MI.improvements.for waits. Amore natural-experience shay be schiet'ed sad,'else amount of groding, required can be reduced by providing minimal improvements in appropriate wtas, sack as ttadevelopble,'steep slopes. IL Owaw file nsily d rsxraier iv addr,wed 3c r6e Spedfic&'lase,y Section 17.11.070 Specific Suidarda Within the frffimew6rk of'thme design:giuideiinea the foUowin' stand&br7c been VaperedtaSivemoreseciflc ciitustiCa. Ir. A. 1. The width of a buildit mamted fist i tG,41toetion of tht i1 "I be tai oC&r t*UWt fe Mount df aw t+�&,Aer"fin" the how to the_ - . tU ofst IsI*arty 3(20)pereept or graft,toe W ldift width cif each Ow Level 1: 46A i A �• t f:� •. f �ttC6Uraged isopurap - ssr+�cWr�t�, Dui w0�rvo elage � 1 1, 2. In steeper temritn t20%average slope and,greater).front yard b may,be reduced to-a minimum of 20 feet from bask of cuth of irk of glfivwft,in ordertosiia: i mrlardSwAing. I. Ddve my SmOks above IS Pc = I'be pcmditd up to a naztmom of 20 to achieve site tY and WO=fhy'Gcq6fi=W=bM .met to the satisfaction of di Hd=OincW. tam talI be emp2pye�l,? ° aiag` �d ra In y cases pq ,ug abrS be A on att tb s 1 e. :. F., (If a driveway sl®pas with asturai costoers it,w+�arzd lava f The latest is to be able to proe�b`de ap to,20 ei?et)" 1 ` _ j i 2.. Driveways shall rot be pe mined which exceed,twenty(20)perrsptt`stop*except' that one length,not at ths'poini of access,of not:more than teki(10)feet may have*-lope of twenty-two(22)percent. 3. On driveways with a iiotm of twenty(20)percent or greater,a cause paving tnateria Ar grooves for tmalon must be.incorporated rout the constmgdon. These driveways shall notezcead I00 feet in length from botfoot of to MOM . 4. Terraced retaining walls,rat to.exceed 4(fou6 feet in hOOt ahadl be pertnititcl adjacent to a drivt way. 5, Mjacent to'driveways,slopes not Smiterthan fifty{50)percent(or 2.1)will be penrittecl. 6. Jrlvmmys a ll enter publitf'rivate streets a ntaining'aS atS lszca�f=sigSat. 7. Driveways shall not be located within 5 feet of an licit. F=Otiow may be considemdbased on lot size,percent slope,and use'�a won wftt) driveway. �;; C. -, 1, Wbere tisiaiatg trralls am,lead adjacent to roax#tva3+a, y skald be limited to throe(3)feet In height 3n order to avoid abatmedoss *f motorWa and ped�trntZ`a i*,elcl'ofvicw Satherwise terr4ced retalaing�ls�ssll be tttillx�l wbichare sepiiatedty is mWmum of threo($)feet imd ipp€►oprlato iq (graphic#16). . ,'Tian" Ia ad'va'"A't ao utilizing S W&WIPS ttr:kl Is athlaa eaadl&iau vimsaea aedelRIOLf ban flit Is at01ct ed. _ r- onto p 32 1 2. aa1 3' ia is not,suited to most hillside conditions end should be:deleted. O tn4s�va"ta e ed aw r, • f R�PYt I is 3. Roadways should conform to the narsral landform w$era poaaibla RQUced raid sections,split sections and parking bays shall be ccs in the layout o€,l�'llsid�"3trxta to ttCe gran#ng. 4 �"`i7M+t Aad a wfa+tt f oo J f lx { Ewa$ (This askibit Shows a (Me vmay deed to r►,wur In 1evel Road ROnvido along i limited areats.) &contour live. As inter# is S the us t slt9p sbourxt 400'eld be s eea�medase revised. firy a�C s. x ��ti _vi D. Artbitectu for slopes26s and greater (The architecture standards heroic are clearly oriented to 8 cp terrain and wau.'d not be appitcabla to slopes that are under 209t., Tlteretbre, the architecture in this section shall regulate homes on ZOOS slopes or freatteb, and the Effwands-North Specific,PlaaAtreF tectatre St+attdarde #hall regulate all slopes underZO96) 1. lUtuildhij envelope for all structures shalt 6,.,as follows: a> A maximum of 12 feel In height,at the f but setback extending uli°and towards the:r;ac or the lot at a 45 dsgtm angle to.a height of25 feet as measured from finished scale: E?8'1 MOM,MR LOT Awh TW ��`'' #oar osleaeic tof of Se"Ma . h S Its S� b. '1 LL g_t-A ma)dmuai beigbto f 12 feet ia4Mg4:at the front setback extending up d MIlds iha isw of the lot at a 45 degree angle to a ' maximum.bcight'df 30 feet S.s measured Frain fiaishi grade. is fedA9®t c. Slane r ats Similar icqu e .4i—dz'for tapbill and dnyabill lots 1aei�tt at ft t :tdittasy be ttc; a fit ntage inside they side yard k I�t�iLdING Etbrv?EL OP = <s�ore�i°7r LOT r; M y t E ISM r's,�_. fi Aft- - tf 7 Building materials and color schemes shalt be based on, the Etirranda North $pectfic Plan architectural stp#dvids• xv, atdditioa, pr,7v1siorts for aisterilils mall also be segrtisted oar rh-.;; faaaeuteac Plate. tka F. Hired out hears are avpercede'•,bgr'tlAe ks`sriwavdb North� a. fiac Plan architectural goildclincs 3. Aveld large gable ends on downhill,elevations. The s?of slope-slta3ll,follow the slope of tha natural grade. It will not ale.ay3 09 ocalmbfe to have root lope.t`allov slope of natural grade: '',ha Srade on a iiy an lot could Dairy signif candy in ar hillside Wren and this would be kv�rrsctica�pn,ia��lemetpt. Also, some lots.mayhasgrc gentle lope�;.aa;el a"ill �r ;fhe.slope will Sot crease an arcltitectrtratlly leatspt®� vatf®a�, Le., a abed roorlook co ulo dewlap. �ncoura ed Discouraged hop"Ar&W"Iset - G,. MW MM&W e T � It t / s.rrtf I "a` U �0,. Suctions H 2 snll 3 a relocamd heart.,. -' J� d`: d'nc forma a rrs end profile o£the individual buildings ata�t atrhitcrtaatml feanires, Aouhl be designed to blend With the::natutal,f;�min and piciervd the character and profile of thhe natural s1'ape.'Some techiilc'pM wbik imayle considered include..''; i A., Split:padsy stepped footings and.,rade separatio cture to stsp u;)/,eowa,ohe natut;*--I slope. ti :1 {, Stems ,4 t" n 1 r , y t .0. D&-d 0 Ora ft4bg a&M,awa%.& i� C. l: �yiwWi a cr flat moffina adcWmd is tl---aia ftecdwtie Ida"' f, k t I� 311 Ens uraged Lwgo coot E"UM--r4 4o pia fjW the 9Vwn" 1" 1i r� is i r 4 11 39 ,� Yf Gl Encouraged } - � �tc�v �act - `� •'�4;4�Z oO .f ci sr DWdburaged '� 1 �cmxeo®uv®t ateta0ad i 1 i St 7 �{p l 'NCI P ® F t7 4. 5. Avoid large u4iiverhangs;rid cantilevers on doaW111 clevations to" reduce the massivi.�appeaio=n &am below. ik r% 1'# aco l t#�9 g8#tFt3dTM V - Encouraged eidctttereged T4mac"ftcts do not kmfo,saa bud g buds when sao>os from hsarby. seanrr am" sari. . EfS ttvg bulk Otetis N or'Withow dks. to t fit o;olraotiy fits - ,� '�"� irrtQ 'i""� Allr@ 00 a a�ff"t cot17 Ul"V�t I 1001 of Asa, 41 �.r7 5 6. Terra;*,the building'to follow the slope. Use roofs on louver levels for the deck open spaces of upper level. Decks,shall be a minimum of(6)feet in (. width to,provide adequate usable area and to eiTectively breakauv"the mass. Ent;ouraged - Discouraged .�no®aser wB ereoa9o�re�rrdra s ga.or era«,trace � �rast�antat<< t ld3B/aod Oft eee Effee & wunNaw'1 I �StieeYae tom,. I � ` bad Via`is Ett4ro+hw d�Y� ®sar9ar ter/aw (. SWs9W lee kd14964Y EteeaU.rrea tbar W mbWma ko WMA.0 Masatw au,20w ia. 9. Avoid large.expanses of a single materiel on wails,roofs or paving areas. ate interesting,small state patterns by breaking►ap;aiding mass, varying building materials and throusb design and ptatsmzaat of and dears. IKS EstCOUT ad Discouraged LOP fee we"WAMM Lop d seem in I"&WOMOM WOM aSaasoa 42 .t f r a r: �. Provide architectural treatment to all�y�des p_.a gOucture. dements of the arcbitecttital treatment used ort.oi=' front ream*shall be repeated on sill r, sides of a struciurt+with additional•emphasis on those elevations"visilile from adic'entpropertles orpublic rights-of-way. 91 9. Excavate underground or utilize below grade room�sto reduce effective bulk and to provide energy efficient and envieotarnentalty desirable.Spam. a, ;BD. Exterior structural.supports and undersides of floors ana decks not . enclosed by walls and may be approved only if it Is proven that nof' alternative type`of construction is feasible and tbat.ilre.safety aadl aesthetic constdcmtio illalve bier!adequatelyaddressea. 44. 11. Residential development shall be Constructed in such a mane er so as to reduce the potentlal for spread of brushf ms by consideration and methods of construction as follows: (See Fire Minisse memt,Plan.} 'I a. .'.. F �0�3Af�•tt?-�F i�6Fi�► itFT,�^4D �r. ': ftwk mvipsSm furls�s ' man -4. ittt3lSi ttl® °1 b. i< I 43 '°r f� k .P 3. Wa.3jr-a ®se ' at= ' (See iwands North Specific Plers.) 4. " {See Nortla Sp"clfic Plan. F. Ltundscanina 1. Landsc aZ`'n'g in .�lre sensitive areas, iderattPted in the Fire Alans�e lnt PI,,sW away utilize_ftre xetatdaat species. Native or natuWi7A- .�ts o,othergtanc species tl t blend nstasmilkwith the laudL=pe arty gene sally iV ed. 2. A,petmanent ''�I�atson system shall be irstalk4a ott all plant:d slopes Z;l gradient or,s.�Eeper over S-A60t 3n,�'eight. Mv;mr,the emphasis shalt be toward uuss,tn!!�plant matettal`s that';17 eventually not need to be inigsted. Waterknd tn?tgy;�anservation techniquesr grayl utilized such sa drip irrigation and(,�dlp�'�al rocksc�pe. 3. R4aintain,a"' ` dative backdrop" by rsplantins.,Vith native trace. The vegetation shall trees stmctuacs to the extent possible at tnattitity and pre sam the appeamm of tlx natural skyline. r2ky1he Ran" I dS �a 3 Encouraged taWOW& �e t9 netwo �9. 44aii«► 3X Mta7t.ettt"Ii a-A r Qiscouraged * ' 4� 4. Jaudseaping&hall be used to acreen view ordowmlrAn elGIfioss, rhea the Sttucture'ltei$ht exceeds 20 feet from 13a ahad,gralic oa tie dams-lope aids, additional lattdscai�g will be requited a-cr ap 1sad tsiag plan &hall be submitted fa.'-review with the submittal packet c. An,;isdoiln-O plan sbsdd be required upon submitts-1 at airhitestural coatstr actdon documents. , (it Is mot prsaticad to submit irrigation plans' w1rdeill ore ' c®tastrucelaar dratWdnf level pdtaas at a prcdlmiatsa7 edesida Vie. ribere!'ore, it bass bens stated they and to be sabstitted-at tlz Arebitectme toatstme don dsacumen pbs te.) S. IU rase of Water eon€etvxtion information documents is To fkL--.her thin end,=A development'tdaali pmvi&-an idonnation pamphlet, t"ratvbyft City Phnnerto t ch pmspieilvetuya land zdtaamp�li�� nose street tree eoapditdoas are all addrWsed' ft166 spicine l M !� . (Ref*r to ebar 'fff'M dM Naafi �iaeadiis Plaan.) l 46 i i i &. Slopes may be planted Avth informal cluster'of trees and shrubs to soften and , vary the slope plane. Native vegetatiort may be retai+wd and supplemented-:thin natural and along natural dminage.courses. 1. Grading shall be phased so thati)mmpt revegetation or consttuctio►tiwiliroi erosion. Where posslble only those areas which.will be built oa,:sesurfaees, or landscaped should be disturbed. Top soil shall be stocltplled during tough grading and=d'on.cut and fill Slopes. 2. Grading operat!on shall be encouraged to avoid the;ainy treason,October IS to April 15. Grading permits shall only be issued.-When a plan forerosion control and silt retention has tmen approved by the City Planner and Building OMc'W Without cegard to time ctyear. 3. To enCOUf2SCL maintenance of slopes for erosion coGtrol aad a thstics,FmPen3'`" lines shall be located a minimum.at the top ofslope,.eras required by UBC. saw mum teR jr `' hroeaea�opof ttl� ti a r-- v Fr 47 s 'a . r \ / 4, No point an any st,mvre:subject to the provisions Af this Secticrh'sbW,'(the Closer to a visually prc'mi►e nt,ridgetine as de;finrd is tbii document than arse hundred and f'ifiy,0501)feet measured horizost Ally opt a opogr hie,ms1)or i t3y(SR)fezt i�ca5t:red ve rtically''ha a cets�s-se onA.:+�hic2 or�•ie te mo .a;. trstrictive:: .�. S. I.cit padding is 1imiCe$to the itotzetdaries.of:ttst stattctuzr"s feat tlatiQffAnd a usable rear atea f rev3dcatia�t aely)off fret ta�Pnjc�a�rtdcnt tc>arad b t�veen the st cctstnw need tap or toe of=toped. I1Cil is� #►yscicalty unfeas�bie to design a reds ttble yard area slue to.r oailict with tlttier gxaditi staadasxisr then other foams of tibia opast space shGulei be snsidereel sucl;as;decks,.patios, tMoonies,or oslsar si;mflsr f orchs of baler stntcatt s d ',gaed rs f;the,..naittttal to ograp 5. ItTo finished slopes gmitert fiftyperctnt(Sp95or2:l .msty,bcrrrat d except beneath the enclosed enavel.ope of a texucture where the zaiax%inunt created slope is limited to 67 perctut UmW:1)or less. l 7. A)I-ohs te-t ,ter OCCUM tittottphotat Etiwjwdjt North:} ANIL 8. Rebta'iaingdvalls art ILmisbd tt+: _ A. t nse srgalc#ge Cfmvi f c s-az CY ''�}not to,execk-A four(4)fetes in h;ight. GOMM=,tect d lag sells tax be utilized which arc sgpet:ttesil by : ie mutts of Om(3)feat and sppMrWe ktts)scaping,.(Tberg is mo sdm;4:Ito atlitxIVwx u iedami'4 tW'i ik dds covdidion sinco eo idlfit6iif 4csetit Is MaVvved.Y A }1%6 IV 4� { 1 ' J I ;l b. One downsloPs from the structure not to exceed W fept in height. U,tberwise., terraced ratgfaing wills $ball be trtflfzed WhichrT arc separs(Od blrs minimum if.thme(3)feet atrd;eppropriate landsGspfag C. On lots sloping with the stteett rind other cot. .ions nw diaeu sed above,gate retaining wail,not to exceed 4' eet is hcijbt xnay be used to a a aideAtd where necessary(also see roadway), d. Walk which are an integral pert of the Structure ntay eXCWJ eighl(8)feet In height; however, their visual impact may be raidgated through, landscape locbniques, 9. No.aufffQ1-cSot r i iti0 4 sip 3�lalatsd.d_ 'This Is not .consistent WOO grtdioat/pasco concepts asf'ate Bfllwazda North Specific 11190.) (This Paragraprl is counter«o the imtco t of rho#tarwerecabelt cover,r SesacrAlly agreed apon fn 'I-be Plitxtaaing commission Wor$s1,40. In planning areas 3E and P,Or gra mple, two mejor gree9bolts with.a hiki tg arafl occur on tart pcdfmtetcr or WIW' t the site with slope$ at 3:1 maatfmax divan antis ttp to 29 lbot to lk+rit. �terafarc,it�aaxc �ri'el�ted.' 10) No,W slt0 r thso those ezistirg tnaY be emeted t sa providt d in !'laxm meted AMA parse xIT#p *I'the Etf"and'ae OJO SpWeillc 19f. 1. Qz bwlns at iiitation bw1u,art wall as a� , t be to promt etwon is o sa i$ a w d'eerma a�emost ee t a twill ar. ad t and resat tw*,rctcm. ttte brow dttebes are €ttt�si , t� G �% sttdt�lve testa: [i 'mr�zyyri P�pnAmisage, --ourovs any,be aleorad by flood vostttat ,�iV��ORY�Liy(tbAy� :5 D 49 :t a r �t. MUM Esstensrve tia4 of Cr®ss Iot d red�fterlsubdomonstra ioa tthatt i od not reviex and,may hecpopo edhitsorAiceatP �°t and would adversely affea the p ._. required is order to minemsze the amount of grading which tvouid�sult with - CMveationat drainage Practices. ,above Jai-dole-ted-ad At ds�d es irty Pgradi to p�eytc/c_esoas•Jsst Y (3' cis-a.b re3�! 4'.. daa tr� 3, There emsslot drainage is utilized;the following shall AWF enk is Psbiect IntPna ane tot may drain atross ores atherAoe if an , a, — �' n V,swa3eo wlaiclt nsais provided,ineteher animPm���� ,atlticlt i$e i''peammce"or within a clod drasnmmge Re Itns bg one;+us t—Alm—►t. .nr3t eCss � DrainsgG aball be conveyed ta.a puniic�•s�• foot.prtvaeg. drainage easement, we eyi® fi to Bch tv a a assnciationj'ortq s pu colnl �initeo m s feet t;► willth, �' o l tc�go�t� r f a �I�na rl �rtseai7xa�+le$s tt e�terrds en of'�'all lots gn a street lsav$et�sa woe�r�s�fe. ffs�Y t Oaf ago- 4p36 - f @� tv UM r. ►�- .. :l 1 ld IV INN - A^ b. ProiectB26ndaries 4 eEs�sYe4ie�-e, ' . m 'Uf:a;-i:edtalvfige impacts to pre °jIiea.xdjaceat to pro oscd development io Has6t ada xort& specitur, Pima shoulT be coalrolled tlrrcugb same 20e of dralaage,facility structure,;or easement. The,type of facift1j, structure or easement shall be, deterzine'd by the city epgk'-er,.ort So individual Iasi.'dependen¢ Upon; appropriate A)4ralogic afaddies, ac:ess requirements god the proposed land usroralte plans. Consldcrstons should be taken into account for ultimate facility desiga-,,Men a'e;ermlfilag the appippriate: facility structure or c�emcat drat magi 6e re gnired I � I- j s .t 4 le as yi We m M Wig!$W inUktaM c (W Qhs1. %a wn 160*wiv Sow,emus" YS9 W! 1�S s �7� nip t- r I. Public Wei ..�the fallowing Public Safety concerns tboutd be,artjdressed: Conditl.,ons that arise Prom the.Foot-hill Fire`Divicdon fire lt?ainagclecat Plan sbaiF eaupertede 'r1toria below wlsere snY coni9'icts exist, 1. R+egetiro aPecgusie t�ater.suppl�r and�oec�r,fe`for all p devclopm 2p ScxOr�ce with Footluli Diyisiot±�,Stanctfri�s`� _ 2. A germenent fuel modification;area msy ias r�%Wired arovxid developrmcnt f projects or psoriicns thereof that ere aaJaeeait or exposed;to eavc ate" for the prirpose of f�e pmtectlon. The recommencFed width of the fuel , modificationl brtidvsn ppp]icable tnsilg man flrb.a? a aid dire, I•Iszard analysis�tedy developed by the.Fi i�l;?ivision. 3. lldeq.ate piravis'sons sikall be. sde for tiie cflntinuet mainta ai catch ins, and,where_feasible)Such:Eareas shall`be desigitieted as cornmaa open;tapace i�'. rather grieate op,`o sgace. a. ,ruci modification areas may'aisoinco sate adl efodim t o l _ w and aodimea mamma to aU to int srntri and celerst esosim 3. The mv 'u a anav ;sire bni is,v *"On or debsia to be temov��cleared within&A teng ott caA aide of every wwdwsy and eec as drive, mey meter taIX pdvst'rPt , y to do ao `!'his secodaa dW] tog y to site e� of trees,otmental;sbnsbbery or cultivated end onirer tech as° , ivy,wcculuats or aimi4r plants u as ground covers,paovided da-not fasm m meets oP rrsdi trWinitting Rm., t used W ftaeetl�,m y'° Means-that portion ofi highway or7privute stitei itaipivv or fozvehistiltac tasvel,' �, 6. If the Chief determined in iigi apes9flc aft that difficult to of- erosion or othsr unusual, cites mstances mab �8c°,t�p' �� the . clawrtm of urudeta:aie or i tatny auk' thereof and raspuhrc teonanle alternative mcmumsfalgned to the JI-11 i f„l ",�� I - 1 - I $2 �. 7. Yn the event thc'sbafemen0s not�p.;,med as required in 5vb-aactiaa 5 of ibis `Y seetion,.tba Executivc Body+inay inst uct the thief to -to the"Mer of eheproperty.upon which said condition exists to co : t such Ombibited �co. did ands it the owner falls to carma,such Condition,the 1F eattive;Body t linay cause the same to be done and pnake the.,expense of such Correction a lien ;,on the pro"upon which said coca°'!{Wons exists. 8.-�%'ltesikct stturxutes aad.£aoilities frot>~geologically hazardous spares. 9. Ra�.gitlre spacial coaatntction feature ie&dwlp'of structv�,-wbe a site inmesti�ati® ersttrt3r n lsotentilal gtodci3ic bazaras. 14. T Triant Escondido and it motmMrfin'gton.$Ai assoclati''lens aft not suitable for asn•site Wastewater disposal. Development sot cn p°sblir;sewerz-within areas.genesally def ined as Uln&either of abets assodatiotis shall bop=ittt 1 only after site spee ific inv'estigationsliave ba6a conducted that the soib are suitablaam�lhe.dispara]o"wastewater wilt nit degrade the suli i ace water euality" ,> . 11. The soil association tnay,hsve sail beating flutes that veld. iimiE sates developtaettt., Structures proposed.oa this soils typh thould be , grtnitted only sitar a cite specific investi�ation has bzen,performad that i ittdicates the°soils'cutt adequately support the welgbt of the ' ;i 12. Foe ail developarient within,the Alquist-Priolo or City adoirt ,�Sgcetal Study statement shall be iza Wded ca every deed foresch lot or pascxi Match infotmse prospective®aver t�f the,potenHal far:seistelo4ivity ;f the goeetatialhsaerd. �eetion Y7.Y1,®.90 aaa�ai`ca of Dw.eliiafl Visit Aliaatto (The remainip. •'portlam, of Ihisv, docamost on, DWel Ia ., [Jmtt• jrrnarrfee$/D &iy It appemdedby the Edwasda Nvr&Apclftd Pfi. w.d i I ' 53 Atitl n5 x, > J 3•-S. -iY}J��`Y ��:}.}k 4 '•� f; `•yw 4 � `+6.,ar+ :� ��+i'R F".+ }R i 'ti a•: ,�v -•—�a-r-- -e�„+.c. ';T {a i. k x'Js ^4" 'Y vl c. 1 .v r, r 4.. i6 P. t � 4 L k � 'ly.` �Y�i�'�`.�-.^ �n�+g. .��e,+r�a�,*e+a._?�-+.l t •"� x� }'�..-� 'l t".i�at mac, �� 1 ;� f < r a� �+: ♦ ,, r �' b*, t:�. w} ts' .� e, a' »x v, . v#. x •� � i� �i �! A4 � ,a 1r ly_ 1"a � �' "',Fb F ''T' t'(' , a- nk rot << �,° -r: a ..:j ,-r's*A; a ;{ ; s"`"`.'�'^,^#s-• Y 1 1 a <:y'' "J• __ �r x .y ., � ;�. r i �� s:c� � �� s � 3`,+ a ,� t u, � r } 1x ra't " f �}w '; 1 ,. ��3, .... A -5,� Y� 4 J'Fd t1 +.' '� �.� n a .� r� a �.h€ " �_ ..,=.�I„,.. �' _.aft N �, E ray4_. .» � ro.. �� r h `� ��� � �..� x i s �1, 1 r: ��,_ xY.0 ^w a K�4�. r- — �'ti•.. �• may; Y • ., t� � M,�a.�k✓ x '� �...%�. e Y� C % { k •� i Y I r:+ TABLEI U Approximate Height ofRear Yard Slopes (Al1 Tots"FrontDmining) SITE GT l?F* $0`1?1EP L QT 001 ,DEFF4}_i' 5to7' 6to9' 6toIW 4-'5% 8 to 12' 10 to 15" 11'to 17' 6-7% 13 to 17' 16 to 21' 's= 18 to 24 8-9% 18 to 23' 22 to 28r 25 to 31' 10-I2% 24 to 30' 29 to 35' 32 to 38' TABLER Appro)dmate:lieight ofRmrYard Slopes (includes Use ofRearDraining Lots) SITE GRADE+ 80'DEEP LC�T I b0"DEEP LOT 12"MP LO 2-3% 3to5' 3to61,: 2to6' 4-5% 6 to 10' 7 to IT 7 to IT 6-7% 11 to ly 13'to,18' ' UV to 20' 8 9% -16 to 21' 19 to 25' 21 i'27' 10-12% 22 to 2$'; 26<to 32' 28 to 1V TABLE III Approximate Height of Side Yard Slopes** S'1'REE"7'GRADE 5WIDE LOT 8a MME LC}T (Ma'Z LOT 2-3% 2to3' '.' 2to3' 4s ' 4-5% 3to P 4to5' 6to71 6 7% 4to5' 6to71 rto9' 8 9% 5 to 6' 7 to 8' lA to I" 10-11% 6toT 8"to9' 12to11, 12-13% 7to8' 10to11' 13to14' 14-15% 8to9' 12to13' 15to16' *'Site Grade refers the percentage of drop between streets ruraniagpaxallel to the grade, •Side slope heights may be larger at end lot conditions or other minor areas ec'the site where rear Stapes E-'rap around in'c0 slde yard sloes.AIso,slopes for late along the inside of curved s'r� read to require hiltdrer slopes due td the increased frontage tengihs.lieges heights vbove arc desired stauttdatais but may be exceeded in sortie cases,such as chase ideatifiai above,l+Ia greater than 15!i6 of all lots within a tract 'smell e�zecd the>abOve standards. Note: These tables do not reflect conditions where slopes are combined and conc'.eatrated witbin paseos or edges of sites. Slop-heights within Iots in such cases may be further, f reduced. E POi S t5tl.c L'RN4rpLRltr6551flN, G�tA OCT 25 '69 r Lall Gsnd3GaFe� ctute Planning • Urban Design n ,. Qctober25,1989 fMs.Cited o11GA t} CITY OTc��*NGIia GUCAM 9320 Baseline Road,Unit C NES 876 gaach0 C one=}, A 91730 lab NO-1 �rectomp'wrt tat: s t Planning Comm�4t�! in Smnda?�s ' sed,Rcvisi0ns to the L tlePllan -proposed �,Narth sP :: fortheEttwan ",. a e tit is on DcasCiandY' of the staff cxPononoctobcr2Athandare yVeapoloB but Commissionbs�n®n and wthavenot bad We received a 0°PY Iorio i g,C of state o'vvad as a directors tcport f be ay this oveninsPlannln8 4esentasl'dC.�i nsortlArm, en6 ts• and the witl not bc able� mmentswiththevatoushiRecntYc, time to MAL testae rt relueta density, the taheld a kerns a�1Q sThed asitycotta0 1 wou'ldbe C3urma)or Senccal con- ,s rem on te-dez potn�"u earl Our n" defuni8on of`'Wllside (845 versus, p°winding i g commwon workshop° Y sincerely, ess VIM IIIIIIM Fdncipal , Corr 14 ' da Consortium'Nlcmbscs 't wzut _ chron f � t4 Tan-1it�4 , it�ntar tuna Sum2QQ Nan Beach. C aatnts 230 NIW