Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1989/12/13 - Agenda Packet
lipg1il gli ill 11 CT'I' RANCHQ'CL Ct�MCX�M O - O ' FIANNI 1 5 C4. �9 dA11 4)' ZZ 1977 ' s WEDNESDfTY DECEMBEA 13,1989 7:00 p.m. >z F:LNS' P,ARI{.-'COMMUNITY CENTER '9161 BASE IME RJ NCHQ CUCAMONGA,,CALIFOSNIA L Pledge of,Allegiance <' IL Roll Gall Cazmissioner Biakeslej' _ Comnissioner M:Niel Camnissioner Chitiea _, Commissioner ToTstoy Canmissioner K'einberger •' JUL Announcements _ t. IV.; Approval of Minutes Special Scheduled Meeting .of Nr&Oiber 29,t '1989 V. Consent Calendar The following Consent Calendar. item*:ra exp toted to be routine and non-controversidG Thay will'be acted on by the Commission at one tuns witha4t'dtscussio* 'If-cuzyene has cansern a�sr any item; €t ' 'shoujube removed Yor`discussiom c A. TWE EXTENSION FOR. TENTATIVE TRACT` 13363 - LEWIS ` HOMES A residential subdivision,and desi n>tview of 96 single e mtii2y lets an'13.98 Mres of isnd in the Tt era Vista Planned Community designated l ow-Medium Derwitg`(� -$ dwelling units per, ad at the southwest comer of Terra Vista Parkway and"Mountain.Yiew Drive-"t1PNa 22?-151r13 and 14. B. DESIGN REVIEW FOR;'TRACT 13280 --LTUSK COMPANY -The design review"for building elev&tions and detailed site plan for a, previously approved tentative tract map'-eonsisrng of 145 single t , -fafinily lots on 23.9 acres at land,in the Low-'14lediumw Densit�r Residential District (4-8 dwellira, ks,::per acre)'of th4 Vietoria Planned Community,loca*Ad at'the n'ethcheast eorner of Bash Line Road and Beivina West(Etlena West)-APN:.,227-081-06.' r z' �nFn +nip The}'ollowzng items are public hearings in Which concerned irutividuai . may Vaice thgir, opinion Of the�retated ;rrajeatf Please, Wait to be recognf�aad by the Vha[t*ntdn and address the Commission.b�3 stating your ritrme a address. All such opinions shot be 3in�dted to 5 minutes pet*%rulividua for each profeoL Please sign inditer spgakingi 0. MOD]k ATIOKS TO COIdDIl7ONS Z3P AP110iii1L FOIE CORD ONAL USE PERMIT 88-35.AID Iss:RCP lti', 3:133fi as "'llAVIDS®N ASSOCIATES= INC. - A request t(m sty 'tithe• V 1 nd1U0n"of, approval requiring the undergr'oundrn a itslities'' siting Bass Ja.Rcad for fihe development of a.'shoppir�g Denier arid'ralaf0d Parcel Ntap at the northwest corner of Base Line Road anjd i ct4'ria.,Pant 41,ane,, APX- 227 1 -28, 34, a 35. t,i' Continued.fro m l ov0'mber ' D. ENVIRONkENTAL ASSESSMENT ' ANI.f ;GENERAL PLAN ,. AMENDMENT - CITY OF RANG> 'TUCAMONGA A Xequereq s to'amend Section, iv, Enwi on nen IL so+rrces, ate` Se'etioa V, Public Safety,'elements of�the General Plan as the4r relate. hillside development and=grading;:.and:' 111 Involve revising tie definitions of hillside from 1096, of greatn'r to 8�or greater,; as v*ell'as rdatricting development on slots i�alaielt ace 30 crarea or. 1 E. ENVIRONMENTAL .ASSESSMENT'AIID :DEVELOPMENT, CODE AMENDMENT 89-02 - CITY OF RANCH 'CUCAMONGA - ,An amendment„to Title 1?o1?o tf unieipel.bode by adsli Chapter 17.24, Sections 17.24.010 through 17.24.000, 17.9601 .0:L eixl 17.06.020.C.6;-atnendirlg subsections 17m06.010.1.5, 27.08.040.B and C, V; 08:U50.V�Si 17,18.020 D, 17.18.030.A, 17A.4.03@.C, 4 and 17.1$.0I40.E.5.b; and". nd deleting subsections 17.06 Oi0.B.5,a thrugh'i, 1'11,8.040.&I.a through e, and 17.i8.040.�AS.aJ through' 'v, regarding establishment of guidelines and"standards for hillside de,g, pment. ."EPT ©IEl�i'I<AZ ASI33SltiEIi` A AII>- CO�SDITiOIAL U8E PERMIT 89 29-DLRw Ii OR a.request to ostablish a bar in a leased space of 2,700;egtiare feet within'e�r.existing btdld!ng Sub on 1.09 acres of lbafiwidln' of the Foothill Boulevaaid rdeSpeci#m'ierPlany�l ca d at 9583 Foothill Boulevard '-AOX.-:'208-261-4T. 4 G. XBRISCAPL ORDINANCE �- A proposal.eta,.amend the Rai" � Cucamonga Municipal Code by adding.a;new Chapter 1-0 a ` addifi� a new Section 1,7.02.1.35i pertaii'fing to _Xeriseap.I requirements. vM Weir Business H, ENVIRONMENTALLASSE55raENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW` 89-16 CHIEFS-The development of a restaurant totaing 5,995. squara feet within the Terra Vista Town Center on 1 €�cr�,of;land I, in the Community Commercial Districtof'the Terra VLata'ann�i,d { Community,located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenu4z—,4 Voothill Boulevard-APN: 1977-421-05. I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMEN T REVIEW, 88-40 - GARCIA AI3t1_ ASSOCIATES --fine development of 3` industrial buildings t _sling 55,109 square, feet as PSase.II of a` [-Z. 10.3,.,acfie. -indus�lr sl".',psc sn==the. General; 1ndustc�al District, Subarea 8 of the Industrial Specific Plan,.located at 1095$Arrowi Route-AP N: 209-142-33, Asoeiated,with this.is Tree Removal Permit 89-65, I ~ J. :ENVIRONMENTAL Ass ESSMENT"AND:DEVELOPMENT REVIEW' FOOL'S SERVICE MANAGEMENT 9RBY.'S - The development of a 2,537 square foot drive=tl}ru fast restaurant on ,26 acres,within the 7.8 acre Alta Loma Country Village shopping Center',in the. Neighborhood Commereiai-District,, located of the northeast corner of Carnelian Avenue-.and Base Line Road-APN: 202-381-24 throu94,26,28 through 33,35,and 36 VM Direet v%Reports K. PRELIMINARY REVIEW, OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SPORTS GQMPLLX Ja. PBEI;IMIIVARY REVIEW OF R�~^ `HO GtJCAMONGA CENTRAL PARK.LIBRARY y-\f M. THE PROPOSAL`TO ESTABx�SH DESIGN POLICIES REQUIRING, ADDITIONAL ARr,HITECTURAL , TREATMENT_' AND �. ALTZRNATIVE TEXTURE.; :BUILDING 5jATERiALS'' FOIi` INDUSTRIAL 'BUILDINGS WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC: PLAN AREA Continued from November 29,1989. F 11. CONSIDERATION OF ADDING DRUG:11 .'STORES: AND'. PHARi4iACIES IN-l'liE'SP►.�,C1AL-Y'COMMERCIL�L DISTRICT OT+ -THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPELIFIC FLAN IX- Comnaa'issida f3aa-'Mess. M Ihklie.Comments This fs'ti;e time and'place for the ganeral public ito address the, i' Commisst,�n. , Items to be dlscussdd here aver those -ivhic7t do not ° already appear on this agenda. ;' R1» A�i�atMFA�eilt The Flannirg Cartmission has adoptedAdWnistrative,htegulatitlns.thdt,.� ryJi set an 21,p.m,iMdfaUMne0.'time. if itens go bey,b�'that ti#ke,the shall be heard only with;the.consent of the CPrrrrti�sion.` ay f. :7r VICIly"A Ty, MAV U, r.J 1 Affii � inmoa y _ C(M�i41f C} j1 f9ares a ' '} ii�iaa �asua as mvapi rs ac me ,:. � 4 r� fpq iAofA. • u•ruvOe+aUe;tF •.SIr A`NIIA •vAua gbtA�9�k�b!'tiwAFlgkit"Aepa6aP; s�� i . ., .. ;. CUCAJOsr+vaaer� i F — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. ' STAFF REPORT DATE: December 13, 1989, 4` TO: Chairman and.Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Pla.hner,- BY: Brett Horner, Associate.°Pianner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR �..T'ENTATIVE TRACT 13303 - LEWIS HOMES - -:A resi en ia, su.;'r9s on<an esgn review of s ng a amily '. lot on 13.5E acres of land I in the Terra Vista Planned Coaftanity, designated Low-Medico Density (4-8 dwelling units per acre) located at the southwest Corner of "terra Vista Parkway and tbuntain View drive'- APN: 227-161-I.3 and 14. I. BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract 13303 was approved .by the Planning 1;omn s` ion, on December-9. 1987. The applicant, Lewis Homes, is requesting an extension on the tentative-map in order to allow these additional time to record the final', map:. According; to the , Development Code (Section i7.02.i0t;3,, exterf,ions on approvals may be granted in twelve (12) month increments,, not to exceed c total of five (5) years from the original date of approval. II. ANALYSIS': A. General: Staff has analyzed the proposed time a�xtensioq with *fTe current developiment,criteria outlined in t(I,e Development Cade and the standards 'in the Terra Vista 0dimmunity Plan, Based`upon this review, staff determined that the'project does not meet the current standards in the Terra- Vista Cowianity Plan,, B. Issues: The tract was designed to border the proposed Orchard Ne`nu`e on the south. This street has since been deleted is: the Terra Vista Planned, Community Amendment 89-01, which was approved by the City Council on December 6, 1989, In addition, the interior local public streets do not meot the current Terra Vista standard. The local street standard was changed with the Planned Community Amendment to include landscape_parkways between the curbb. and si4ewaik consistent With -'City-wide standards (i.e., 60-foot right-of.<, The pr®posed tract was designed with curb adjacent sidewalks (i.e., 46-foot right-of- way). Therefore, 'since` this tract is not currently in conformance with the Terra Vista'Comrwolty Plan, a new tract . map which meets the current Terra Vista standards, will need to be filed by the developer for any propsed development. ITEM A PLANNIts CQI+4RISSION''STAPF:REPORT ,- RE: TT 1.3303 LEWIS TOMES December 13, 1939 Page 2 G, 111. RECOWENDA?ION: Staff ;recownehds that the Planning Commissfon',deny ,appTican'f'`s re4ue"st'for a one year time extension,for Tentative Tract 13303�through adoption of the atttache&�ReSolution.') Re spec~ I submti'tteds Braai �! city P7 ner BB•BH:ka Attachments: Exhibit "A" Letter from Applicant ` Exhibit "B" - L afj Ptdp ' Exhibit "C" Site Plan Time ,Extension.Resolution of Denial I Ol ;y I i 3� LeWUMom e s Management.Corp., r, 1156 Noah Monntain Avenue 1 P.O,Eox b70/Upland,Ca[ifomia 91785 714/985-0971 FAX:1141981-9799 Q���� �'Y•✓w(} Calf 1A .�j�0 14DMe: November 1, 1989 A � 3 City of Rancho Cucamonga P.lannang Division r P.O., Box 8 G Rancho Cucamonga,, CA"' 91730. Attention: pan COlemazi. Re: Tract 13303,, Tentative'Xap Extension Gentlemen: Because the storm drain design of Traci 133.03 was deiayed for over a year by the park/bad,tn`issue and,.'mare recentily, .by the redesign. of the nearby. park a1'd greenway system, as ,reflected in Plan Amendment No , .6, our`' related ;.infrastructure plans are not far- .enough along:.inithe approval process to e11Aw,",: cording tie. map before its expiration. Therefore, please, eitend"the,expiration if/Ate of the. tent ative��1ap approval. Ste intend to start grading asltsoon as the windy season. is over, and-start construction,pVtrie,houses in�`ebrc}ary or Marchi Thank you for your anticipated co6peration; a-chac3 for the;$62.f10 fee is enclosed, Sincerely, Trewis Homes• Management Corp. Don ThompVorn� DMt•cs r '�', Enclosure tti -. �. 7�3 ,. k k � 7 wR R }3}ice' �a r tom •;✓ / .{��',��Rri. fillid IC► � �� �1�� DETAILED 514E FLAN PLO ►g TENTATIVE IrMkCT NO-13303 iN TNe nTY ar„ANexq caugoGca �• F.OYNTY O}tAN tttNA}OtNQ }737L Or'LASlrOtN'A ^� ~AOfU9T^)1t7 f4.59 GROSS ACM6w a•m7{kOTfSOS ,gyp � "o �nT♦.niMi: in L` o .. �A A COMWfAID VON N&IC NOM 'f RANCHO CUCANKMA Tom: ftAMING DW03N EXHW" SCALE 461 , �r RESOLUTION NOr NOW A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISS ON i1 DENYING THE TIME CXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13303 - APN,•'- 227-151-13 AND 14 ,.SAND MAILING 'FIJOINGS IP.1rSUPPORT t" THEREOF WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extension for the a-hove-described pro;ect,,pursuart to Section 1.501.83(b) of drdinahce 28-8, the Subdivision Ordinance; and ` WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above-described tentative _tentative tract; and WHEREAS, The Rancho.,Cucamonga_ Planning,,tom iissinn- finds 'that- the tentative tract described herein is in`conflict`with thd-'directions of the Terra Vista Comrrteniy Flan, as amended; and f WHEREAS, the tentati`Ve tract described herein does, not meet the current Terra Vista Community Pion standards, as amended,. with regard to local street design and does 'include a portion of orchard Avenue which was previously delet d.` NOW, THEREFORE 'BE IT RMLVED ; that the Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Commission hereby denies a time extens,�ion for Tentative Tract 13303_' APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY .OF DECEMBER 1989, ' PLANNING COR4ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCi cut-MONGA 1l BY: Larry T. McNiel,:CaMn •s: ATTEST: ; Brad er,,zecrqtary I, Brad BulVer, Secretary of the,\\\Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby 'certify thiL- the 'foregoing ReSalution was; duly and regularly introduced, passed; and a�fied by the,Planning Commission of the. City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular rr�eting of the Planning Co mission held on the 13th day of December, 1989 by.th,J following dote-toavit: Y A ES: C"ISSTONERS: �t NOES: C"ISSIGNERv: ) ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ,r CITY OF FCA7�1C� p CUVAM0NGA rATT 7PIORT 13 E: Oecember13, 1g85 TO: Chairman and MemS'ers 0 e Planning commission FROW Brad Buller; City Planner BY: Steve Ross, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 13280 - LUSK COMPANY - The. design . rep+ ew for bui ing a eva ions an , aped s to plan for a previously approved tentative tYac�t map consiW'ng of 145., single family lots on 23.g acres of eland 'in they low-Medium i Density Residential District (4-8 dv fling units Per acre) of the Victoria Planned Community, located ,at the northeast cortrer of" Base 'Line Road„and'Belvino West (El let- West) - APN: 227-081-06' I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: a: A Action Requested: Approval of site, conceptual landscape, and grading plans andr build` 'ig etet,,ations. A., Proadct'Density: 6.05 dwelling units pOr acre. C� SurrourdiM "Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant; Victoria P1'anned Community South - Vacant; Terra Vista Planned Community East - Vacant; Victooia,,Planned Community West Vacant; Victoria Planned Conii;�unity. _ 0. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Low-Medium Density Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) North Low-NfedsUT Density Residential (4-8 dwelling units' Per acre).;,Future.Park;Site; Medium Density Residential .(844 dwelling units per acre) South - Med)uru Density Residential (E-14 dwelling units per a 4; Low-Medium Density Residential (44 dwelling unit,,,; per acre) .1 East - Medium Density Residentialdwelling units per acre) Vest - Medium-High Density Residential (14-24 dulling units per at re) � r ITEM 9 t , P�AI4NING COMMISSIONTAF- REPORT RE.'- OR F,OR TR ,13280.'1 CU_-*,C(X4PANY December 13,-1989 .J Page 2 _c qW «. E. Site Characteristics: The site is presently being rough : grae . II. ANALYSIS, A. Background': Tentative act i1280 was revierted by the P,ipnn rig Commission ion"December 9, 1987 and was appro ed ter_ the subdivision design and conceptual grading. The applicant, The Lusk Cortgaar�y, is now submitting plot plan and, building e)�evations 3'or design,.review approval in order to, proceed with the construction of i45 burgle family names, B. Generr': The applicant proposes.:five (5) floor plans: for the project, with all. of the, plans having,.,four (4) design :chew. Additionally, enhanced;elevations will be provi::ed,on all ell Vto" lots which s-ide�on 'to a trail or street. This. occurs oli 25 percent of the.lotsj` The smallest floor plan size is 2,212 square feet, while the largest 1s 2628 square, feet, excluding the 5arageSir which,,are approximately 550 square feet each. Al l of the homes are two story,, with the majdr-ity having three car garages.,5Twa-Gar garages are provided on 20 percent of the units. Storage areas for recreational vehicles are provided on 25 percent of the lots. ., 14. C. Design Review Cemmittee: 'The Committee (Blakesk�. Weinberger,, Krouti recomi:rndee approval of the "prodert sub3ect to the following conditions: 1. Transitions from:siding to stucco, should occur in logical places. Changes'should.be made on many of;, the,elevations to address:,this issue. ;; 2. Addi 'tonal articulation should be added to,. the garage side elevations on several elevations.. 3. A' "'return walls should be I architectural ly b ppatible with the homers. Gates should also be rrovided which are con Jstent; with the design sdhem of the hommes. .. 7esign of the walls4,should be reviewed and approved by the City, Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. Multi-paned` windows should be provided on all prominent uindows,� including the upper floor of 7 the side and rear elevations: ! 4; PLANNING COMMISkON STAFF REPORT T RE: I OR FOR VTR 13280 - LUZ COMPANY f December 13, 1989 Rag a ,3 5. "Two-inch by six-inch trim around.All windows and doox should be .used throughout the tract. NOTE: Th asove 'concerns were addressed in rev sets plans, which were s viewed anti; approved, by tM�" r� Comtrittee"on-DeeeftU# r"r; 1989, III. FACTS FOR FIiW;NGS• The project is ,consistent,with the Victoria Com VnitY �?)AArr nd, the- General PI The project will not, lily dq'.Crimental to . ad3acent properties nr cause i sJgnifi`iant environmental impacts. In t addition, the proposecti>use is in c, compliance with,the applicable,prouisions of the Victoria ,Comrainity Plan, the Development Code and City Standards. IV. RECOMMENDATIOW Staff recummeOds that the Plannitx, Commission approve the design review of Tract 1.3280 through adpption °of the attached Resolution with conditions. Res Tly itted, Br le City annex 85.,SR:ko i1 Attachments: Location Exh bit b - i . _ Map _ Exhibit 11B1' - Site Plan Exhibit "C" Typical Fencing Detail Exhibit "D"'- Building Elevations ResolUtionr of Approval with Conditions F c; �n r rtusU Lu 1��11IC ttiuuntfiiq.�. Awl- � ►IF/4A77� ll)l�� tlNl► � �V�yr� unnnot ,� sf! fTT. i,i� fitity� ( ultnne dl� �#4r: ■jjQQ ryry!! J tilllRi� �Iff 4fN:JI t 7i�ul�)iii •EC��� �1-1t17 � ff ^� f''KY'�5f}R� = _ ,.� gt7lll�tl1 fti tlt4N�SlliMi I�„!I r'yi 0 �(;,1��• i i 3 � _= N lurl U�1"� dtlrtl ♦ ♦/� INl11j)�%r. f',j-�h*, itsffsttsi r 1 � �+4 ,,,�� '%1������i�j �tnr `(1'..» -y�7 ���(�A1Ntmtt►lM�l U � �tlyi ,v�� ,� .f_ 3!'��I�t�� ��(�� tom.---�_ --;..j�s1 ''I a1 s°���as+�,• �l 11N11 n''U'pill S t tttiNNtYdtfi 7.......-../•S tl11�1�1InU ttll4lY NI.,�YY811 .Fun/Nf rd r+ 001, 1 dnU (!Im ==W � •. � C Sflt� roa. m� 1Mf n' nn ulm. I� t G fAW "� ► �� 1' q �_Lj j mu '►1 Vim MAl M AF Vow Mo Mw FtX -� ti 1 �lip 1� /# �7r a 4.•� ��F t "�' nr� �^� it 6` f rt n �� (( ti !y Y•�/ i (A1 a y,. �� s — � } T •i C � r r i Or-',U.: NCHO-'CQCAMONTdA �. PLTRII9YIoJI� 7IgI. ti�7r6 ' �IEI 7�. �1 k° Cd y' •1 � 1 y, €U W tT Joil La t1l 1� L 7� �3 a� F. Q �} LLJ' CL.. 999 � o � 5; '�.�..< PLANNING'DIVIMON Tff Le Mipacm. rp-mut4ft 'Dettea. tZ Nall �...�. r O■ mcmj a• } �t! dtJjl lid M�. L ' IaiiAa :?I.h�.2� ai�R.��hYY.�, 1J\;.��.T�y��..-� t• gva.SUM sw�sf X71f Cj$�rY' T, ; A '.mass mass ir�/.tcwWta� t '1 pan ow ■ wrh ti 7, �r uq•.` rtr r c , ■ all, k flil�lll j �■tl t l k 4• �$� � `�I��ifili(t1 w�'Ul�iliJ," �7 t K..] � 1 att) F t. a t t f l A If jlira' i IHftflfli�ti ��ajt�aa! I tt a a t l A t t a,la I t ttt ytt atayl) rt tat tyl lA aya ' 11 IIlli Ayl sa;a jt;t { fait tttjtaajt ■ jtjajt�)jj ,, ■ Raja tjyj 'tjt: fi t jttajl � ljtj�jf! i r �"1 11 ._. �ia"aur +, .,fir r 1 [. .� �. 1 clew _ JI III ���•", ill � u: �Y°s� >:"� k3111jNNN(�� 'wlmuu�nts •�C R ,� °-ate ���=S� WR I lAp ti till- Y! � t 5 a "e9NY ►` s ■I �j fi'ac a xw i�.k�� _ .r iltilt ft4` u will 14. d �• to , 1�tl,. , i I• � n.0 r— �� `i 4t'l ` of fie► ;yi;,it, � } �: .�t ,i��,�ii�i�� i�{ nS;i�7�1�� i iri;s�i'i nflt to 71:,•. SINK qt lif- ��µµ t aka�l �•+ aa�+it ;�. fill�� t® ,.III�' i ' '. rR4� �^.►.� ,. wa la.■ {�cs a� IS :. ... 14"A" 5 ai F ,� tv am r. - ( ® � :S• #RT IqH► rrHr {:. �� fffBBB��rlllbbbiii �i=�=�t o°t HrPr� 1 S �f+.j�■,■,#i�I �IIIIIIIU .> �` t�i1�a.;1111�a 1{Rnunu nrunmi{r" - i�i;i;i;i#r ,44+.■:■,■■ // .®If, n 1�! �jll � i 1)Ihllfll. � rl"i■i■i�i�i■i■f I#'. �lilll Ii.,�}{FYI�R ypl..''p ;i�i■i+i■i■i+ �, 1�l t�8'iil �lil� ti■i i■i'i i' k I ��tll�lil�l i �E I��t i■iii'i■i;�,■i tei f y r1,1 aE�1�l�{r r■,4■.■1■.•.{ ��� �7 8 �.4 il�llil�►1;� �IUJfultl h� z � ; ,ry ll. �)LII�■I{)#a;. � ii ,4;''; ��a�u IIIIIt1I111111t t i+iii+i� 1�11�1t1J111{IUIIItII14` +" >,�� IL ,dli�ll�llllll` Illfl�n11111111i Illlil , x;. 71f1�'ii I iij' 1 gl 1ggI A�lUi iiaw�? '�;jti��;��i� tip' ►i� s�.: it i 1 � y��itl rit''^ei� 4U�Ullufd�. i .a .d �l�f r +.� 'Illt$;t� t' ��1111ia1lIHE1: Y !.!fi .t ffi � tli'r'!4 gas ii fii11111111 flit ti' i'i L�l �lull �i��'i�t(t'fi�dllltlllQ1111k!!li!!!F�- si •i+ifi+if i+i �� 1� 4� �+i"+'�'i'eii�li! Y {pt 7c['-{l.�w 11111HI1 IIttlF t1111 rttt! r rfy5laF jfa trrrtftft�,. I f,[,�ff�,t� �iFi1 I .I�1Al �;�'�,��f Im � f=;�efr�r;�iE tlfltttt: It7QlUt2! f[f � t fattftt'!'r�. i0�it lyt #`yr'�' iiIIII ii a tfe't'!'t;� //q■ r ! Ijr.=,=Al. -rit ^. x• i IAA aiiira n i. i¢ 1 NaAr sa N K��►� �_+ �k yid��* ;� �,., �, ■■tfrtn i a flew ti'y 1 �+.. .{ti M .G�a�' ���_yl A���ii 1, `�;.4`1`•;'S4r�,X-`; ��.Q�i rifr� may' .•. eN.�c , i NA p h 1 kY1lOA � inn!}���s't�l 7~.i141rw(wh � ,��•t�M'L{ �*�1'x'«. 1 ..-.•.-i �aHti�~dal ,. 5>'��At n It6 � yi 1 RESOWTON,NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCA_IONGA PLANNING C"_ISSI©N AP?ROVING' OESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT N0. 1.39-$0 LOCATED WITHIN 1HE VICTORM PLANNED. COM34INITY AT TNT .NCRIHMST CORNER Or BASE LINE ROAD _AND -ELLENA WEST IN THE MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTI : DISTRICT APNto 227-081- ANOt MAK.ING;EINQINGS IN SUPPORT THEREQF 4 = X A. "2ecitals. x. . (i) The Lusk Company has filed an application for the Oest n-Review of Tract No. 13280 as described in the title of this Resolution.,, Hereinafter, the subject 'Review request is referred ko,as "the application". (ii) On Oecember 13, ?.989, the Planning Commission of the City„0f Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the appliccation, _ (iii) R11 legal prerequisites to the adoption afJthis .Resoluton' have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW,, THEREFORE, it is hereby, found, reetermined acid resolved .by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as-fol lm. i, This Coamissian+ hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in. the Rscitals, Part All of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. ;used upon substantial evidence' presented to this Commission during the aba�p-referenced meeting an December 13, 1989, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows; A. That `tom proposed project is consistgAcwith the 4 objectives of the General Plan;,and - B. ThatL the proposed design is in accord,with .the objective of the Development`Code and the purposes of the district in which the, site is loca*.*,-;,and C. That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; an 0, `ih at the propotpJ'" desig n, together with the fi �I Conditions app(Icable thereto, will not ' be detrimental to the jr lic health, s fety , nr welfare, or materially injurious:tag pri*ertics or improvements in�lhe vicinity. 4 a 4 ' t" i PLANNING°C(WW+ SIONJR-66617,0N RE-- O .,FOR 'Rr 1 28Q LU54 C 6+iPA�+v Decenb,er 13, 1584 �g a 2 � y 3.• Based 'upon the findings and conclusions,,set forth inIparagraphs L ar,� r above, this Co*issjor�}ereby approvis the appl,i'c bti66 subJ6it-to each and ;.very,,tondit'ion `set fo'rt,�d"TO and: in the,attaL6 d Standard Conditions, att_ached_heireto.and,fncoxpnrAted hereint-by thjs Planning..Di;vision 1) p 1 conditions, of Reso`ttftion0 8? I7 4 " approYilrg Tenttiv� lrat is ea) shad a1 2) A final:icousm6al"a►alysls-'shall be;submitted far review Ani approval prior to, the' j4s once of:tullding permits. The �.port shall assess' the noise impac�F generated, along` Base Line Road, anon shall , id-enttfy. instigation ��,eeasErves required to .meet, the Oity's ,indoor, an<i``_tdnorr C13 noise.standards 3) A Certificate=:of Co,�wectloif�to the final`nMp s?taT i be recorded, . prior; torts suarce of 5uilding ,perm,As tivh3c�'�' charges tfpe namo of F "Belvino_ hest atxl "�Be ino; East". ,to." 11ena �y West"' ?nd "Ellena East". s 4) Mal design, .of t`e reirril 'WZls .hall be -reviewed ai►d approv :by the`.`City p1_an �prior ` to issuande of:_bgild;ing permits Corker side-,yard sl6aes.sh4 I tr.e 1`andscaped and trr9gated etp+den sidzvtalks and fencekr 4fls. ihzA-1 lie` c i d`.' round he a ti Engineerinav,Division• ` 1) Kenyon'tda' shall beconstructed fu1l;Width from f BeIvino Ellena .Way) to the north side of the $ogthorn - Pac`fii6 RaiTOOd ,. right�of<way, including the r road crossipg. r 4. The Secretary ,? ° this tr.kir4ssioa �sha11 eertify'to the ac+c t;3o►i of`this`!esolutiian. 44) 1 4'= PL9!!NINR,COMMISSION l�ESOLtI`, ON NO ' R '-OR FOR TR 132 80 - L1131C CC1�tE�Afgy Q"ecelier 1 1989 -age "- r ATTL � Bra , fir,Bu ec'retary T, Br,d Buller, Secretary o �ssio1 Rai"o Cu rt3fy £iatt_ they for'eg,otn wad; duly "and' regularly introduced, passed, and adopted..by rthe-planning Gomm:ssion ,of the City of Rancho Cucamorga�;at a regal r meeting of the P1.annirg Comm sign held on the 13th'dau of December, 1989, byjfie following v©te-t0_vlit: AYES CEN�Ik:SSIONERS: ' A I NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS t nit 1• lA� ff{ i t 1 r' I 4 � 1\4 j r h j 1 Y J R i � ypL V AN O N ,:L oy3 J� c .�tl w`N��M4 9�yVV uyq �� a`J�N.aW ..0.�gYg �ns+Y��• , � Snoy oA!-cn' y NiV �. E yo a`O LQO qWQ yi 9i_yy LL. gpa' G6A dY eY HCOsit Oy 1bT�aOuCs� yL• Lq� 'n� �byja C^V~y p� 0C0 gii� WL QL� q,0'•J 8g0�L. G q 0 re' 4 W. ro�YJq M! YdIM Jw®N ..Y Q ',Rp9�B� 1 'W5 gyri m: a .v.s a Y q Q Y W 'p wiy> wyy a OW O.Y V� fS`.� N rS er.��t,] r—L Y Y �. W L'p L C L YsC 9 C q�N .�..EdeY$.. Q ' uN QA. Mqq 4NCC�gDYC N_Cw 4�y�i wywC CLCH.��,00� O.xpy°@�: �U�B9<•- � �� V V Muu C N N d C w u 0'cgH N�j Y Q., �n M{pY� q'SC Q R pq,,�••pll a t�i• ♦y�V�/�, mto .�YYCI sNL q�� FOON K.VJ`.ENP Oy�V� pp�,�pp6 yy. NjN pie® �L+ i' b � a • �: Oyiii�A't•S qC N O o cc 41, r If 01 V M •�7iM ii � ^'b 0.„ �1�P0.�� f l �.4t�y� L�q(�tl '".�M� y� yy 3` Gp qqGC p 5 Y q 1d Ci��l�!66SS� V.N V� 0«N� Oytle �O«��^q `YN � wp9NNat �4 pQQyy 1 qq a iCr Yy p a w�N �yp9p�� J 1 u 013pb.^ O y$r q4b G� - N.`�MMMM C � a.4 Ni �OpLr dl=��� ` < G 3 Yq.+i 4� �• `•L N3•, iR C q9 23 yx,. Y17,7y u bIIEC H TI Cy eW N� Yis .C.M": y�•� 4�LOC �1+OC �irUtf4Nw� �4�CLg64 �y e$6u °Jpc ?? $®Y Lc1b a 40yv $��v 211 3`syas4 a�p 0 ILA 22 . y li«may �N M �N uM..L��.eY Lr LEI.. Mb V tV %� �� �y � N � . � �_ a9s «;, S I oa a 9 4N 'Y� y�L$ ^ « C O C yM B YD a y1 YYy.y q�q y� ..Y w:Ll(l�'Oo [p1T¢ ��f $a L.>6a Tv �hf1 n C.G1cY M�@O� b<Jy�i. CY QN YAM7�.8 � qy'�°�"Z .� 4Y LC(a.11n. 4YY««�Yb y� u�. La.�.; OOY y` N C• 4i5g xH 531 „�SH 8 g%1213 1 814264 Is -w CM w p p .Y.� OA3yoi L' ^Nr 1 6 � •s.ia/ yg�p. M1�6 Q�p�ytl Lj gYu �� gYY•� qq�gf¢. Y 04 �PY�gIpg` S.�bCit-.pb�3p `O4`i '. pp `p, yN� O 1Y H� b W a O M M t, � $ � ,11 s � Bf :6 A. y 3 am lox e L 120, ZWSA Ic ash` . � so V � If 4116 If all eu � . qpc =a Sa.orvc�?$ a ,��•y.4 ce Y $` o't° � cri ,Eo .-,YrB IfA—�N.sCn ae^a�a� '. 'L��o•�.$ .� "y°'�7��d L ^C u CY nn Yu 1�� Yw� 00 �4 yy tfqq GAC 4 _ C ~ q: 'TgJq W dT yg1 qnw C«~YY C CN M■AY L �a w ,E 01w LE V YRY a w yyy Cg L yy(Y��}01 cps y i « Y q N d~.W y��o .Y ZZ A ch w C w .�E C G V_L L.L Y y C N �•p^ W 6 N e e 'w{�4�]«yw AAVt 'jaw N.�N _q�•- yN� �19 Vdp.Ywdsll�l ro qry L Y yy Q b VO�BNbw _Y O Ce» cc yyyCC N5 14e.. GYO Q6 22Wpp..a'a}}��CVL pQeL « CO Oo«�■Cy c OQ60ooe—*L Odaq'� :.�YYf CY �d L o :0H•6 ;�?t"a' qg 4r'w.+-r LCY o¢YYY�� 3.0 -a p w C NY «.S w O MMY � O d.l�WWW L%a O.y�6�wp -792�Y ®Y i 0.1e ~N y 9 s q a^p L 9 p V O r N V4 » d«L . ^'Yg 6L Np� y�.QyL G..ya�`-.. '�' ^C �1 u Mw� �.LY Y•O t p�} T u V S.f6Q yL«N Y 019�e� .: C 7 P O <• C»Gy C �^ ete� ii «. �Ly�A�' � g� � L� Y C N N f C:'^N C�• 4 A Y y Y ds _ y_�/� A a '- «.�se�Lo •y„L N.L L Q-rL I G Y �N Y� C � b pOl..J" q -.g p cyY O «'C«C« ti W L,«w F'~"O aqT. Q Yuy ��.0 ... �O 'LC�G . N�M9N Q.Dim .CN 7/MV' In:Nt aFM.'V P!^p��VN04 r'i9a. G �.Y''-Ya ) OG pJs � 21 W .W. m6C Cr A .—MILS« " E:a soy �ap� a VY .WE V O i 9 Y Y .Y q 9 ZKZ � Y�+�Y ^ay Y�1 gom �Y ��M C� pail a y a Nf .Te y�^, 9 d p O w g I.G �y-- 9 �Y,,,«6 V b �q pp¢$$$$y..}j� p J Al p� yy.qg is i a jai 1p gg yg w a■.Apy r!� p <.� ® it ® 6tls M -a Gid C� a IN f� N w 9 ri. g . N V n. ssit j iw AEmW MK y; Rw w w�. t , N U 4a�Wc w�,~Y 4 QN sa ygo{yypp� �y ��'. gwrCw' `K �OOra1w �caeyy +ayy$ p' gym.:. Q N.dw �.a0 9Q�Q SZM Y ��Y aL:V p0LLOa _.�$ 4t .GUa 6+ NH4..i~ +l M/p` A, C�yi Q¢. 0( + @yNi"t.".W y Y Y O y py —T G i{.: •\�( 4J Y. � O 4�gW L} yyam' � ,i (may} i�f� ��Mn .� O r•' �Y fit g q tiC" (.rrwp' 51; wW NU 23 - s �Y i3��^M MCYP .W Vol uw~"M 14 O"Y�p11 Y� ' �CG fir* ~SiYi� �,L 1� Y��Y 6 Maw ` s� 'gT �o ° wit ��'. '`�� a CW�� c u � YC V w a G � _. Y`uda s: '...�.4�, �" a1 W 4�1i ~ +� Y 4 131 H. � N�� ��Ap 4 YRu.,� ,q�Y33m� � p� � •�_ C_ p 'R".:. all 73 v g�. lit 0,551 +4 'toot AOf -a - 11 :11 -3 • lo ®., go G vs nw�.a.. r � � •i5 � w R � �� aaggcpHi6 u ail s � + Zr1vs- �� �� �1 � as, cc dgb'L`« �N�� N'r(A1SV N�., ` �ON y` �■ YrY Y4i 4 ti po � - N r� ' ��� yy Zia 4 o G .!YS HV: 3EW 1KS p.F..6 �p9 W tiN TV� �'WWWtl10 �, etr`YY �Y6 �L'®6DCOyy$Ilt IL N 1 - y4" �pp 44 Q rg6 ee�@p w 6 r:Rp . �.�d N� y( BOO w�O�a • HIM p7s Adz % ya 111 W WY 0 i0•�®� d� A ti C� �w i Q .. � fd G •W �C .r N� �f K YI �! I { SIN [ '�l I ,( I � �d'� O 9 p9Y9 � C -• � � OM t29 'fir. or eta aiw eLi „M ci LLA Ck W� -C . p C.�:� g Q C�O _Y 9 6� N 9 L Q 4.• C .V+ 1� � O� �� JY 61 P NS.. .�MM :M PY 6J sol..N y Z cc ,•.+p a,^ $y{ etj Yiq�uaw �' can " u�, � ���� �� '~ .} ejw nP nOy tli C $Ape 4v ..CYat eI. `$.P. N Q Y4 y oa^. +o �$•• $ .5 $FS Q $^ o n� �ye �o e ^W NS �pg+ OL `L Y V�L ^ ,rL� US`a' lB Y Y�C M : S^*�1 MO1 NY�f C iJY W �, qM V� fib, M Y$�L 24 60:. � •. S �y�y� VM� ^ ® as .ciO4. I O ey •• a S aS 2-1 Y ^� $Sas- 28 � SY Z. 221, <� ri gat u ucc � CO � N /1f Pt .V�� 0 �• �_ ~�b i': �f. Qo tea,• e p�Y uw$ Di��\ V�yy as rC L 0 a O ^^ Y v� Way LAJ W, yy nee c�� 4 QQ r OY p 04 t'h.Ne' a Lusaa 00 a ai s,,. Us` of �s � a g3 g ass s _ 16 a p E L H''. i, y Mf Ibf4 , CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA STAFF REPORT WT DATE: December 13, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members of the PIanning Cotmiss on FROM: Barrye R. Hanson,, Senior Civil Engineer BY Ping kho, Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONS QF APPROVAL FOR CUP 88735 AND ZACORPORR0 X requIst 5 mocli ry e condi Til.ons, of pp'7C rovaI requiring xne under9rd0ndirig of ,utilities along Base tine Road for the development. of a�,shopging center and related Parcal. Map at the northwest corner of Base Line Road and Victoria Park Lane APN 227-111 28, 34 and 35) 1. ABSTRACT: The Developer is requesting that he be. rel" eded of "the requirement to underground a portion of the existing overhead utilities: ocated it the Old Base Line Road right-of-way. The issue was initially;schedule€1 for October 25, 1989, but has been continued twice to tonight to log staff and the Developer to discuss the issue I&more detail. II. BACKGROUND: The project consists of a subdivision (Exhibit "B") and development,of a 2.9 acre shopping center (Exhibit "C") at the northwest corner of Rase Line Road and Victoria Park. Lane. 'Both "were approved by the Planning Commission as CUP 88-35 and Tentat_ a Parcel Map 11838 on November 9, 1988. The projects were conditioned to underground the utili}ies on Base Line Road from the first pole on the west side of the cu`_.'de-sac street along 'the'project's westerly Boundary L to, 'e" terminus poleyoff- site east of Victoria. Park Lane,`=;ncluding the46, tions crossing;f,.A on the south" side of. Base Line :Road. The, uti=l'(ties in relation to the property are shown on "D". The Developer's letters requesting the condition modificat.W- `ire attached aa,�exhibit "E. III. ANALYSIS: The Developer is willing to undera�°+nd the existing overhead utilities located on the north side of e A ne Road fronting ,his project and: extending both easterly, and westerly from the project boundary;: underground the portion across 34sA Line Road: at the project's easterly boundary including ;the easterly portion in the Old_Base tine Road right- Of-Way up _,O the southeast corner of':the property between" Base Line Road and Old 3W( Line Road,,and remove the portion across case Line Road at the project's westerly boundary: {t 1 ITEM C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 88-35 & TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP. 11838 - J.F. DAVIDSON ASSOC. DECEMBER'13, 1989 PAGE 2 fs He is requesting that he be relieved of the requirement to underground ' the westerly portion within the Old Base Line 'Road right-of-way 'which provides services to the existing winery and an existing residence, because the property betweery Base Line Road and',Old Base Line Road is under different ownership, therefore,, should bear _the..cost of the underground4g upon its development. "Also,,E it is assnme3 that in the future the Old Base Line Road right-of-way will be vacated and it, along with the property between Base Line Road and,:old Base Line Road, will be combined with the property to the scuth for a comprehensive development. If the existing utilities are, undergrounded in place, they - will more than Likely have to be; relocated in the future at additional expense. Staff originally placed the requirement on the project, because it appeared to be an opportunity to clean up the overhead .utili-t;es along` both sides of the street for the entire project frontage, not realizing the complications presented by;the existing services, i A second issue, not mentioned in. the Developer's letter, which has :enl on. discussed by the. Developer and staff is how to handle: the exis'ci utilities- extending westerly of the project's west boundary. T1ij� construction of the transition of the pavement frc6 the new curb Location to meet the existing pavement reg0res .that a segment of;the: overhead utilities be relocated outside% the pavement area. The Developer proposes to underground these , lines and receive a reimbursement from adjacent develepmentM Staff contends that he should only receive a reimbursement if the undergrou►sded 1i'nes are placed in an ultimate location and do not have to be relocated in the future by development or street work. This is reflected in the proposed condition revision in the attached resolution. IV. RECOMMENDATIoi: Staff recowends that the Punning Commission ck�rsider all input and elements of the Developer's request. if after such consideration, tie Commission can r€comand approval, then .the adoption of the attached Resolutions would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, (a Of e A0, 11 Barrye, R. Hanson Senior Civil Engineer BRk:PK:dlw " Attachments: Vicinity Map (Exhibit "AP) ~^ Tentative Parcel Map 11-838 (Exhibit "B") CUP 88-35 Site Plan (Exhibit "Cu) Utility Locations (Exhibit "D") Developer's Letter (Exhibit "E") t f Ask I�N V� " 7" P�tLYFIE KR t! 4_ Crff OF CUP -35: P !9 RANCHO CUCA*oWG _ r. E�'G � P D Cll+� �': jl r 3VACANr REMAINDERLI - 'PARCEL iSt ti`r/7Fi►L* :r�;` PARCEL � ! �Er li .srr -wm I •v�riS'w.t; �� R RLAlk ` •I, �+. �ri�. i�`-4�t.St`7�; XNT/�i M'M:YIM '• '.'• arc• -'...` �; i � i �J:� L� .3. Zo- �s.vim I •� �-J I .��. ��rrn2tl6'Y�K.�"tJ � _. 4 pro M0011re OF COS Cffy RI.WCHO CUCAMONGA, to VUHNEEM4 DrMON. P _ fR Y� F I • UL ILTIAN VAR Crry OF • + �' �r,,r�, ee � RANCHO CUCAMONGA TfrLz. c&tP -3r SIM PI-AN i 1 It !Tt 1 ReRLPt�w'dtr+ r asirtors Fus+-r,�sar P.�ftCE1, MAP t r uwaeaac+uNn tti ; Pat.tc sc:c®,us� Y Z AE1YWtl+Er +7FiRu°iYiw uwasyas"reouat+�Lif FAFCE 'V°'iO SC C4�ISaTpktGs$,&? � ' 10 :; 1°,zoo, . 1.fA'1R3` �POG� Tp a �✓� `^� ��"r� l l Lr/Y6`i RAGr r 011+0��e xtBT 1S111i.D3WCa: afiPam i is t9 aw +e9a .sr ts Y as gaes.s..a 300143taya, Inc. ENGINEERING PLANNI G SUs;',EYING :RCHITECTUIE LANDSCAPEARCHITECTURE Scptember 26" 1989 Mr. Barry Hanson CITY OF RANCHO cucAMONGA Engineering Development Ref^iei6 rt 9320 Baseline'Road' l ¢, Ran^ho Cucamonga, e'& 91730 "ie: Request for Modification`of �_-ond7ition CUP 88-35, Tentative P.M. 118,38 'Pry op CUC`rIG1NffRiNG GtV SAQ y,YQ4 Dear Mr. Hanson: A meeting was .held at the City offices on september 25t;Y to •+ discuss Engineering Division 'Condition No. 1 of the Conditional Use Permit and C- lition No. 1 of the Tentative Map relating to the underground.. 'of existing overhead utilities. Attending the meeting where, myself, 3'oe Stofa and Phil verbena of your o2fice "and Ed Long of southern California Fci-on Company, amm During the meeting 2d Long presented the Preliminary P Jan' for the undergrounding of the existing overhead li":aes and indicated which poles and liners would be removed. He alsG'pointedout a problem with removing carta3.n golbs and lines which now serve a ref:;;Bence ana the historical ,,71nery building tying'south. of our project'm' As shown on the enclosed pl'tr the polen and lines which are Proposed to remain are in 'the; old Baseline Road right of way which will eventually be abandoned and quitclaimed tack to private ownership. Because of 1, ..his. it is unfeasib.�e to put this portion of liie underground when it could conflict with, future. uses of, tdi> Propaerty. Ed Long also indiFated'that. there is-no Practical way to Provide alternate service for the I�'3cv winery ' lines or tNee residence. 3ased on 4 ,s informatioar.the project applicant Hughes invest- ments, Two !orporate Plaza #250, Nevport Beach, CA, L 9i2610, requests a modification to -the above referenFed conditi5ns relat-ing to the =dergroune3ing of existing overhead utilities. TheMoir.,OFFUMITIONS C1rff OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA TMA Aair 3 cry 0 `i �' City (if Re-nobo pucamonga Paige 2 ` modification mould a116W1'the exiting pclac and 3Anes locmted ira the old Base- line koad�right of way, to remain unt31such'tame as. the proper- ties southerly, of and adjacent::ta said rjgb,^ of,, tr y= is developed. if x if you have az►y.rguesstionz-racasaang :nss niaaar'or require ; additional itif o"i mation please dol not,hesitate 't cal tae. Very truly Yours, = aJ J.F 7AVID96N ASSOCIATES, t2IC. Don a. Edison � Senior Proje,t maziager... cc.* John Potter, Hdghes 'Investmental- y aim Bailey, Williaffi•LVon Campany ;t Geoff Reesl%md, SGPA DJE:klcq coljtwpsletter, br.8 , r. r t� :NGINETV man'AADSCRI'st"10,in= EPoNG FtANNINd .3URVEy1NG 'wfICHIT=RE LAND HRECTURE November 27, 1489 �. Barrye Hasnso% CITY Or R mcau CR7CAMOA1 .4 Engineering Development Review C/ f S320 Baseline Road Rancho cucaIDonga, CA J1730 VEER/R'G 01` G� Re., Revision to Request ;for Modification to Condition CUP 88-35, TentfLtit,-d Parcel Map :nan Bear Mr'. Hanson: . Following is a revision to our initial raclilesat dated Septemtaer 26, 1989 for a Modification the approved conditions relating to ' undergrounding of overhead utilities an the above mentioned projects;. The first proposal for >aOdification reque`s.`sd that all overhead lines and Supporting poles lying on • he south-side of EaeeZiras Road and along Baseline Avenue (old Baseline Road right of weir) be allowed to remain. °the project ljpplicsant witshes to revise that request to propose t1hat, xl new poly be Ansta X-Iad at the southeast corner of the"privaats property lecited ,at the I convergence of Baseline Road anti BassUne Avenue ar the norms side of the Baseline Averue, (seas attached plat) All utilities from this pole easterly will be, undar9rounded., The Overhead � line« .and poles from this point wesatm0ly into,the historical' winery building Shall remain. This portion of the old. B&.2,61ine Road right of way in ap Separate; street from crest<pgo ject and is fronted by privatb parcele on both sides. C12 rc,�ttnding ref,,the lines to rsbmain should occur then theme props��ierst develop.. If you have "Y questions or r ' please feel fre>ss to oail. stair® additional Very truly y{{ou}rk,,+yp��.yy�-ga ��p1��p i6Y�/q 1 P1�0VWi/188�7fY, b - '•..� Dan J. Ldisoaa Bsniok P1=ojG,-.t Nanager MY O I RANCHO CUC ON A %,(;DfMWG DIMON. MMMT%. IL J f4 ��!IESOLUIIQO No. 89 288 A,RESOLITION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMON�A PLANNING COWISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA'RCOIFYING A CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR WP 8845 FOR A CONCEPTUAL.MAsm PLAN FMB A 10 ACRE NEIGHBORHOOD SHOPPING CENTER, IN`LURING SPECIFIC APPROVAL OF A M ACRE PHASE I CON$I S17 OF IM24 SQUARE FEET OF RLTAIL AND A 2,187 SCjt3AR€ FOOT. 5ERu1C€- STATION, ON;LPN4' LOCATED;OAF 1}{€_-NORM. ST'CORUcR "OF BA SE , LINE ROAq.:-A!�D.Vt MSII PARK SANE 1V THE VICTORIA SPECIFIC 'PLAN APN 227411-28, 34, 35") -- A. Recita.1s. {i) On November '% 1988, the Planning;Commission adopted Resolution No. 88-228, `thereby approvirg, su5� t to Specified cor it ons, CUP fl8wi which provides for the &elopwnt of 2.9 .acres of land within the~Victoia Specific Plan. (ii) On S�.f}Qmber 26, 1989, a request was ffled by J.F. OavidWn to modify. the,condition rof approvo -requiring the under,:', lading of utilities within. the t11d 8aSe Line Road right-of-`Way.. (iII) On Octeber 25', i989, and Gtrstinued � Novenber� 29, and Oecem�er 13, 1989, the Planning Comaission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a; duly noticed public hearing on the application an4-,,Goncluded said tsearin9 that date. (iv) All legal, prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. : f� Pw'04i, THIREFORE, it i5 -hereby,-faurd, determined and resolved by the Planning Comnissio Raricho Cucamonga'as:follows: , . - - I. phi§ GomnissIon hereby`speci.fically finds tfitai all -of,the facts set forth in the R ?�s, , art t�af this Reolutioq aY�e true and correct. 2. Based upon. substantial evider�e presented- to th,is Comrnis's on during the ;;�ov -referenced.public hear-irgs on October 251',Nave4ber. 29 and December.:13, 1989, ;including.. written acid oral'. staff reports, together with r public testlmo r this Com iss.i sn;hereby`specifical ly finis as fol Eosas; (a) The deletion of the requirem�nf to underground F the existing overhead utilities within 'the Old' Base Une. ,Road right-af-way from the idinery f�.. building to the 4ast boundary of the Oroperty f betwten Base Line RoW and Old. Base.Line Road - 3 (4M4 227r11147) As consistent with current �. l city-policy. ` f t P1 ANk1NG COW ISSIO`tk RESOLUTION N0:z 88-2289 88-25 - J CU 1l SP F. DA IDSO `ASSOCIATES DECE14BER 13,`1989" PAGE;<2. 3. Based,'upon the -substantial eilidence presented to this Commission dsring the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findingf,of A. ' facts'set forth in paragraphs. 4n4k 2 above, this Comimission dnereby finds and conc1GtdeS as follows: .. 4 (a) That conditional useermit- is consistent with LL the General plan, Development Code, find r ' f- ;Specfifi:C lans, and 'The, design' or im,�rovenents or ttie,Ycondit lone i' use permit is consistent with.,,.the General Plan', pevelopment.Code, and specific plant.; and (c) rTChe site: is physically suitable for"the typt� of developrrerrt proposed;,ar►d (d) The, design of the development is not likely to cal se §ubstantial`' �environntal :_damage and avoidable injd'ry to 'humans and wildlife; or the* habitat; and (e) The conditional use permit is not likely to cause serio us s'R ub lic health problems; and (f) The design of the conditional use 'permit will not conflict With any.:ea. nt acqu red by`the public 'at large; now, of'.record,. for aecess. through or. use of _the. proper. ,,within the proposed development.; 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies than the project.has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the ialiforriia Environmental -quality Act of 1970 and that^:a Negative -Declaration etas-issuer on,November:9, 1988. : S. Based ;upon 'the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, Z, 3, and 4 above, this Commi Us.ion hereby modifies R6s-oliation No. 88-22& by changing condition.No. S under Engineering Division to'read a'5 fellows; The existing overhead utilities (tel a!nmunication and electrical) along•the `'project's g$se Line Rgad frontage shall be undergrWnded €rom the: firs'c.pole on the 'Watt",side of the fut&e ajl-de-sac- street along the • project"s westerly boundaryp the. terminds pole offsite east of Victoria Park ,Lane, including tho" portions-' crossing ;and oei the south 1' side of Bay Line Road except the portion from the a r� existing winel^y.buiidi to"`the east�bouniary of the Parcel between .Base Line. Road and the' 001d14 Base ��I PLANNING COMMis&ON gsaLUTIQN.Nue_ 88-2286 �? CUP 88-25 J.F. pkV1Dsdff FSSSOCIATES ' tlECENIBER 13, 1989 PAGE 3 Line °iaad right-of-way (APN 227 ill'=2T) prior to u pub Iic i'mproveitent acceptance Jo occupancy, chever.' occurs first, far ally parcel. The; whi Developer may request 3 reimbur�llement agreen nt to ; _-.-_rzcover =anewhalf=thy* i zdeptr -_:,tort: for.x,;: undergrourding� 'from.;_ futuredeveiopmeni (redevelopagnt} as;it occuri on- the opposito'side of the. `streei for. ."undera�,au[diag : in it's u'Itimaie Toaat-on n•. 6:, T 'Deputy ;Secretary to.this .Commission shall certify, fao''the adoption of thii� esalution APPROVES)..AND tlPTED TR S M DAY OF.DECEMBER, L989. f<•` PLANNrN CONErss!ON OF rHE`CITY:,QY RANCHa CUCMOT A — ~• BY: LarryT.,FrNiel,. haim.= r - zt ATTEST: 71 �1 ra Bu er, Secretary I, Brad Butler'3 ;Secret ryr of. the Planning Co�nission of the City:;of Rancho- Cucamonga, :dd her.eby.certify that the foregoing .Resolution `was: d11y and regularly introduced, passed; and adopted, by the P1a,nning Gomnissaon .of the City of Rancho cemorga, at a regular meeting:c _,the,,`planning Camriission held on the 13th.day of Decenb,,er, 19899 by the feIIOW,�;ag vote, 0-unit: I' AYES: - Aco SS_IOtiERS. HOES: COMMISstoWS: ABSENT: CODiaiIS5YONERS: f \ 4t x ^< +r F f, RESOLUTION NO. 88-229A A RESOLUTION,OF THE RANCHO COCANONGA :PLANNING•COMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO ClCAOONGA MOO!MNG A CONDITION Of APPROVAJ.°°FOR PARCEL MAP 1163ti A SUBDIVISION OF 2.9 ACRES OF LAND{`INTO 2 PARCELS, LOCATED ON'tHE NORTHWEST CORNER. OF BASE LINE R= AND VICTORIA".PARK LANE IN THE VICTORIA SPECIFIC PLAN (APN 227-111-284,`35) A. Recitals ' (i) On Not'ttober 9, 1988, the. Pt.anning Commissforr adopted`,Resolution No. 88-229, thereby approving,,, subject to specified conditions,. Tentative. Parcel Map 11838, whivh provides for.the subdivision of 21.9 acres of land within the Victoria Specific K00 (11) On %pte*Eat 2n, I989, a request was filed by 1F,. .Davidson.,to modify,'. the 'cordition, of.,approval requiring the usdergrourkt:4�g of utilwt as within L'the Old-base :ye :Road right-of Oay. (iii) On Qciuber 2F,, 1-389, and.corttii ad November 29 and Oece&er . 13, 1989, the Planhiog •:Commission,of the �'ityjraf Ref fso Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on ,t6 application and concluded said hearing on that date. - 7 (iv) All legal prerequ:sites.to the adaption of this Resolution have occurred. 8. Resolution. ,- NOW, THEREFORE, it is:hereby found, determined and resAlved,by the . j Planning Commission of the City of Rancho ilseamonga as follows ti 1. "ecif#icalTY finds that ai) of the: facts set forth in the Recitals., Pai A, of this Resolutio ire true acid correct. 2. Based upon substantJiat. evidence presence, to this `CoMis.sio, during the above-tefe4hced public hearings. on,,Oateher '�4, Novenher 29,.and December 13, 1980, including written and oral "staff- re*ts, together with , public testimony, this Cb mv±issiori hereby+ specifical ly fir s ,s, foliow's., 1 (a) The deletion:of the requirement to undergroOio�' the +x"Isfing:',overheod -uti-lities within the Old �BaSe lane- Road right-ofay from the. Winery } t' h:.ilding to -the east boundary of the property, between Base Line Road and Old Base Lint Road (APti , 227.111,.Zl) is consistent :witty current City policy. a ip PLMNI1 d C*AlssIO ESbLOTION W. 88-229A TENTATIVE PARCEGMAP 11838 = A.F. DAVIDSDN ASSOCIATES DEMBER 13, 1989 ' PAGE 2 r-w i - 3. Based`upon`the substantial evidence prrser, d to this. Cortciission . din-.hg the above-referenced public hearing and upon. the—specific findit9gs of facts: set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this,cam i.ssion herby finds-and concludes as follows: (a) That tentative' parcel map is consistent with', the General Plan, Development Code, and` specific plans; and (b) The design or' improvements of the tentative parcel map,is consistent with the General Plan, II, Developmentt CodeA-and,specif c plans; and {c)' The site is physically suitable for"the type of development Proposed, and (d) 'The des gm of the subdivision is: not likely to cause'' substantial environrental damage; and avoidable "injury to humans and wi-ldIife OV their"habitat;_and' �. (e) The tentative pavdei map '?, not likely to cause sericus:pubtic-health problems; and ft (f) The design of the tentative parcel map will not conflict with ,iiny easement acquired by, the public at large, noiv of record,' for access through or use of =the property, within the proposed subdivision. 4. This Commission hereby finds aind certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in cortplincew : the Caf �` nironmettait E quality Act of 19Z0 and bat. a-';ftgqative�Declaration was isssled on Foveaber 9, 1988. S. Based upon ther.`-it sings and,conclusions.set forth in `paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this commission hereby modifies Resolution No.' 88-229 by changing condition Ho. 1 under Section 3 to read as follows: 'I The existifig, overhead utilities (telecommunications j and electrical) ;along the project°s Base, Line Road \ frontage shall be undergroanded from the first;pole . on the west side of the `future` cul-de-sac street along the project'`s westerly boslrsiary to the , terminus pole offs to east of Victoria Park Lare inc U ing 'the portions crossing and on the .sarth fr side of Base Line. Road except the portions from the visting 'Winery bt0lding` to the east boundary of the Parcel between Base Line Road and, the 101d" Base FLA NINS `094MItSibN'RESDLUTIOyN NO. EB-229A " TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 11833- J.F.,DAVIDSON AS�OC�A;aS �( DECEtiBER 13, 1989 ` PAGE 3- ; G Line ';Road right-of�.ray (APNO 223-111-27`) prior to puG,IIc, improygentt acceptance' or occupanW,4 chever occ4/s, first, for any parcel.. The 5; Developer may P uest a reirrbursepent regiment, to. recover one-hall the' City adopted cost Fars undergroundingfutz,re development (redevelopment) as it ors�on the opposite"side of the' street for uMergrourxiing. ; In.' its ultimate location. 6. The Deputyec Sretar} to. this Commission .shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APRP.OVED AND PDOPIE THIS 13TR DAY .OF OECEMBER, 19,89: PLANNING COMrSSION OF 1HE-CITY OF RANCHO'CUCAMONGA BY Larry T. Mie , C airmen ATTEST: f - Braa gul, er, . ec re are 0 1 I I, Brad Bulleri, Secretary of the'-Planning Commission of the City ...of. Ranc.6 Cucamonga, do hereby .certify-that .the foregoiM Resolution Eras lily and. ` regularly introducEd, passed, and adapted by the Plannirr Commission of the City of Rarscho Cucamar�ga, at a regular meeting of-the Planni Commission he I'd on the 13th day of Oetemtier, 1989 icy the foliowino vote-t04it-,~ AYES: �'' *TiiSSION�tS: NOES: COQiiISS[O�YERS �� � Gt ABSENT.: COWISSIOM%E : - x y. NpfJP .n,. �lG"UG��'fFti P �x December, 8, 1989 t Cl Mr. Chairman and Members of the 'Rancho Cucamonga Planning CommsFion ; P.O. Pox 667' 'Rancha Cucamonga, CA, 91729 RE: Proposed Hillside Development IReg`u1,atioris set forth as Chapter 17.11 'of the Rancho Cucamonga Development code and dated Dear Mr. Chairtfiz o and Commissioners,` Th;nk you and the planning staff for the,, ,�o -artunsa!ty to review r tx- o s Cit y propnsed=�i,llsde Flegelapment'R�:gulatans. The following comments are provided for ysur.review prior to apprav4l of the prop0 sed ordinance. „�. Both the Commission and the staff should be commeni3ed for,the professional job which has gone in�o'""w, formulation of these proposed standards. We greatli apprecial-e the open attitude, public forums: and numerpus-revisions :which'have "occurred over the or':.ginal document, The prodess of rational and measured public', pZ;anning has been Well s rved by your actions. } Our conv ents are limited'to a narrow range of issues which,,,, if fuxtlher addressed in the proposed regulations, will xesult'in a set a�f sta*+dards providing for the widest range of potential land' use,analyses. . Rxr We respectfully draw your: attention tv the`.attached Page' 13 of the draft .regYlattars which se 'torth.!:ertain slope zones. as dictated by el;sting slopp percentages. As developers. of golf course'. communitas we greatly, a'ppreciate the City- providing far convidesation of alternativ,a"gradincc •te6�n .ques whic i encourage innovative solutions to special topigraphic. constraints. We therefore propose the City explorA the ctt :.ction"of a Special- Study Zone in areas of slopes between F ana 15%: This Special Study Zone should amplify the subject of ":alternative 1 <. conventional grading- techniques" and how "special design features, such am a, golf course" m.Ight provide for a number!�"of r innovative solutions. The further steely of this subject would build on the flexibility, that is offered in the proposed standardslAnd allow for more h efficient review of proposed development in tt.e special St-ady, Zone. t. F �V `r. ' Diu Ke"y PfDjeCt�?itectrX r^ F{ VNDMAPX CANT)COMPANY OF`AQFQPNIA,.lw,.110 N,w xoi !Aw. ,suge 100,Corona,tal f* hh'Oi740;.'7144g7p lu LI F . ,...- ,. f Rancho Cucamohga Planning Commission Decemher 11, 1983 Page two; We wcrAld a'lso.yIsk your consideration of issues present on Page 42` which has also been attached for your convenience. IThe' sectional Illustration on this-gage.could he_irk prate"]-to depict a, situatior,\where drainvtge Flows would be constrained by materials present In the drainage path. .This illustration should be evaluated by the citl'Engineer. We feel Vv;t narrative provIev 11 for under Section G.1 on the same page provides clear direction on this subject, The interest of clarity might also be well -served by revisions to the building envelope illustrations on the 4,.tached copy of "Page 49. Maintaini,g the same: goals and incorporating the'same" standards 'through different illUstrations,would serve the best interests of'the proposed ordinance, ; G Attached Page 57, provision Nb.'A references limits to rear,-Yard areas. Wei respectfully submit. 'to the commission that the inclusion iaf strict numeric, limits, ,such as the 25 feet .set, forth in this 'sesction, defend the purpose of the flexible`and innovative,standards proposed by the,-City. We also feel whet imposing sgch limits could work against the City"`s d6sire to create an tapscale community incorporating subdivisions of larger or equestrians,size lots. , Our final ,comments are directed to the "band Cap&bility. Schedule" provided ah Page 65, also attached. The-tables 'which facilitate the calculation of the "capacity factor" place a Unear constraint. upon rogulations which otherwise encourage flexibility and innovation. We ask that the Commission and staff consider the questi5n wherebir,the slope 0 assiZdcation of 9t is provided a factor of "1.00, whereas(; tssificition of' i is assessed a 25% reduction in :rapacity at 0,,a5. The equity, where a slope_ increase of 1$ or less s dealt,a 25t .red uction in'oapaaity seems contrary to the otherWoe= easured prouisians c;t'tha rro�?sad regulatian5. Such arb:i:.:rary factors aSE,��Eaa.l to aI t kcipate wide:arra of'conditions Y conditions in•b 'ilsde :areasa - We feel tte otherwise excellent provisions of the proposed Hillside Development Regulations are thrown into conflict with these "capacity factors" ; We also,feel this sedan could potentiall3 y constrain the ability of the Commission to analy e features and W ements discovered through further study ?f,thll wide variety ot,,conditians anticipated) these regul:at S. Rancho- CucamQ,;,ll PlariTing Cam si miSon December Ii, 2�99 page three Thank you r'qe ri nor'yoiir consideration of these coinments N,,a ask that the Planning 'Commission examine- ?the. .posstbility of incorporating our comments ..into the rFi �` proposed, ordinance prior-to . hearings by the Rancho cacamopga: City Covnr--il*, Sincerely, j l Mike, Kerney Prcotsct Director: 1 Landmark Land Company,of California, Iric, - ,. 4i' r`t. &V D N" FT FOR b. a X'. CNS�S f: t' 5 to ?, 9 Development with gradirg is permitted in this zone ,hut eXisting` 'I andforms must(retain their nq.tural characte Padded",,buil d`i"g(1 sues are permitted, however, tf:chniques such as contour grad�'ng, c,ombined slopes, limited cuts,and -fist;,"and _._ split ievel architectural protAtypes, or padding frr ,-the structures only, may 4e,rgquired xto dine ;graid;ng;, Consieeratiq of :-sniterFative conventional grading techniques rra► ,ale aiio^ed for a pro3eet within a Water pint, xhich ^(,f imludas specie, aesip features,, such as a, golf course, extensive open 'space, or Significant Upse of green belts or paseos.. 3. p, .to \14.9 This is a hillside condition. ..,.��. Spe cialibillOdei architectural and t ,design (jtechniques that minimize grzii:a art x.:requir.F{d in th js zone. Ar..�k,*,vtural prototypes are -,-expecte d ;to;teonform. to the naturat r� ^• 1'andC utng tect;niguee.such as plit' levtt. foundations of greater t o 1 Hates, stop walls,,stacking J an, clusteringt x �a�ie LY L_ llse ar alti�rnxcive convention lta geading techniques rtiay considera� for lim�trdi ;portions of a proa'e�t tr'fihi L, R; raa5ter plan which Includes �. special des features, ..such as a golf'fcnwrse,-extensivpeh space err Sig nificant use of green gels or 4 ?5 to, 2g g �Jevelopm�alt Within this ,zone' Is tad to no more than the J �as'a'l y �t[Uil`17T1C11G 40002s, 'and then .-Only `where .it ,can b( shown safety,` enVircnmental and,aesthetic � ., 7; impacts: can .be •nin�rmi?ed." Lse of larger7ots, variab7,e 'set55acks and var `' ie b� i�dinn structural tec,5nic �ucb as stepped, or pgfle foundations are �xpa�,ed. '' ;= Structures shill bJan , ivitF�.,the, . t ep�vironme►rt t�=rough r their shapF, materials, .dnd colors, ;'Itppact4f traffic .and, roadways i`s to minimized by ,foilbWi?, " natural co�itoux s, or - ".uS, ig grade separations �'✓ 5' 30 and'over Ylt,�s is:an e:.cessi,ve slope condition �a p and develoFment is prohibitQd. ` � r Examples's€ gicading �R var,iegs slope eateg vies+ x 1"z j i. 4i.are possible, drO,,'666e�a:hannels,:.should. b placed ,;—less Visible' ioctions� and' mars importantly; should-j receive _a naturalizing . treatment including native �—'l, ,zoIored con,retE+ an ii landscaping, so that #ie ,> structure appears`ras an it+"te ral, 'ar� oft>e anvi.hanment. 7 9 P. �0 ln,,all ,asas� concrete lint at shall be usNd 1n ed0tion t •A natara't'izing trea>Ylenz. 'd �. � �. �V Hliee 11sri�Lm; i Use of dative rucks to OAfuratize mari=made, " T H --max Tips Al�'DiRr CirQcit �}• f a12+1� A C.4t tostctst+Kne, k} �1n �� t t �r ,✓ 77Y Cj'f J 1 � A k h 6, OW I lit oaxwtfta hbi ht of.`12 fee��t t froth' s+:tbatk expending up dnd''to and the..✓ear of a 1ot•'at a 45 degree aogl� to a ' max rrtum height of„36 fodf"A� Measured from finished gri e A atiw 'h ighff.. at the side seOaeks shall be 15 feet-extending up`ter the'e�tte�.of titelo di = a5 degree a S to a cea k c . 3geght :�f''3a fee meaa�ae�d fry frhet;.y grafe I U � B��LO� G NVELd t4 �. i 431 45° SO' 's4 n 15 `' 14 i'•iet.saFtbDc �tP $ li�l4ot#[i 1 k f i a� n y yt� r ?'A c. dross S�oue =Lots — ��x i� .height of 30 eett as measared from finished :,gYddeF afirthe fronis setthackxted,rtg t4er,.d-the r� of theThe maxu� height.,At, the side se'rcbecks.'sha1T be, extending cP io the.ceater of-the_jot-3t a dbree:,angle to Fs�m of 30 r feeet measured:,Pram fi"rishecf grade:' Simildp pe wipe��»ts ,as..teia '�HiTT apt' �aaphi�� lots' exeeat bat he ght at €p®Rig a�d, stay be a pgss €P�nta�e €ns 8e ape side fapy."5Q §aEs , _ Buig.��a�s VMOOE Fob CROSS �.O�' SLOPE ty jfr�-•---' r z t ij" e 4.5 CL L d� J" a 'SetbaCk 3 w r� t d. ;ThP a ut►e provi si; 4j are intended'to MAY�x try e. sgai 'O buck and over �T . piss of-, the bufTrii'hl cl�itectu�^al esric aura variations 'in'. rrnf massing are encoui ed = 'Pe ecttws abbVe the; height !fNfts for amchttertural features NaY Ie, considered subject fiss the provisions coaptained in Sect ton 17.Q�S,USC?�':3,f. 4= \4 jt 'i jct 'I - K '.".' . �� Mi4I.i..r Il of '-✓� ; C� �y ' yl 5. Na paint on any structure,sub3ec� to the provi;siatis .df this Section steal'} be closer to d visu Ply prominent rfdgeli�ne than orje hundred a,6 fifty (150} feet measured horizontally on a topographic.,*ap. ar fifty .(50) feet meas0,'red veriic`s lv ,on across; segtion, 1s.hiche+per is more rest.ictti4,o, 6, tot padd#ng is limited to the byyida�ies of the:sstructureess foundation and s-usable7xrear ardv�area Cres dentfiA& only)' of is feet a scent to and between the structure and " s Physically 0. unfeasibie.,,to design areaspnabie usable yard are due to conflict, ith other grading standards, then othor fbrms of"usable tipwlspace should be.considered; such as: decks, patios,, balconies, or other similarforms of built struotu'res designed to fit the natural topog'raphy. ,r c 7. No finished slopes greater 'than fifty percent Mt or'Z:11, may be treat" except beneath the enclosed Avolope of a,structctrE"wheiwe the, maximum created slope fs limited to, 67;perceKtt(1-112;1 or less. 8. Slopes within City`aiaintained iaiuiscap2 Ease+ nks shell not`: exceed a maximum grade .of thirty permtt (34.3% or 3 1):'.. C i 9. Fill Ehall nat,.iexc,eedl a depth of five-(S) -feet at any point except Where the PIppning Commissiei determines that unusual topography, soil conditions, previous grading, or;other unu circumstances 'indicate Ghat such Irad°ing would be reasonable .and necessary "4 Oc Re�i in �wai,s ar ` t _.n 9 e limited tad to". ' a. pne .upslope (fram the structured not exceed four'°(4? .+ j feet in height. Otherwise, 'terraced;retaining 'strlre8'ur+es AO-9,f shah be utilized ;which are separated by a minimo of thrp.e (9) fit a'd apprapriata i landsFaping, f <y r A . f�aicuiatlan of-density The maximum,nUo6er of units that may,be permittPa inj�a prop'osed"de`veiopment `sha2"'i,.$fbe eteir»ined fly mlltiplytna that 4! + area of land in"each` "slope"" Categozr " by'the "st �ciiy" Yap or, OMI In the following table, taking 'the Products. of-these cal;ulations c�nvekted Auare ' fert,''and dividing this fi(#re. by the requited<s :A-aria unit; quire fFet prescribed it the underlying" zoning' dts rid'c` tkcept the Hi`ll•s3,de Residential - "...01strici Where there- i5 no` minim srr" clot size"'rr uirgd), am ,.,the t�:llside: Residential District,, the a,lo�rap amp -af` huilab3ereav',re�utt iron ' +' the Capacity Factor calculation w rl ,,constiFtuwe thejused nd ';buidable area. t, f s . M B. land Capability. Schedule -7 ` (*BuiidabI'd Area' Capacity,, Adj; Net Buildkle Slope cot°goiy Its u ve. feet, Factor �, �.Area (-s uare feet) Ul der iQ percent { f:GD 4 f 10-14,9 percent" 't _ - X J:75 TIC _._. 15-19.9 perlcent. .X" 4.so 4 h 2Q-24 ; .9 percent ' 25-29.9 percent' ?X; 30+ percent'. "v. K 0To', �:;-"----_ Div ded Oenmitted 1� byinRmurrF number af< lad slztx� ,`j unptS ��_ _ requ tret�tert Yin 1. z "on, - y g ., district _ ce ;t side Residential:. ° *Buildable�r'axea y,�si , contir�t,=au area.of.tSre 7 t, w#tIc6 is less?"than 30% In natural In the a4a'' ilertermihod,, tYfrgt��� environmental studies and.1l estigatiotr as buildatIg ; J,� fG "CITY OF AaXC 10 WCAMONCA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 13, 198 TO: Chairman;and t'�snoers of the Planning ,Commisson FROM: Brad Bull tr.-City.-P.anrer, BY, Cindy Norris, Associate-Planner E SUBJECT: rN11+TI FENS SSESSMENT A'ND GENERAL PLAN`=w�'ENDMENT.d9-0�6;- reques o amenSection, nv ronmenta TResources, and Secrifon V. Public Safety, �- elements of the General Plan as they,relate to hil4ode f 1 development and grading, and will }1+rolve A eevisir. the def,;nitions ;of 'MAL side from 10 percent-or n pEraent or gredter.--, as well as restricting development`'on slopes kahich are 30,percant or'greater. , EYJIRON�tENTAL ASSESwMENT ANR 6EVEROPMENT CODE AM NNfl 1` 89-02 RAW �,UCAKONG -Andmend�Qnt n.x a 7itile n c pa . , e ,yea d�CWbir ]17.�24, ;�ertions M24.0 0 through 17,24.G90 : `17.06.01 1"0 L, 'g' 'an�4'�° 17.f36.020.0 6; AWL amending'' swsection's' "17.OFi.010E.5`,. 17.08,040,0 and C, 17.08 050.E.5, 17.18.02O,D, ' 17.184030.A 17 18.-M C, II 17.18.04OAn1, 17.18.00.zE.B.a, and.. 27.2$ 040 i5 b! and f dcl'e:ing subsections' 1706.010.E.5,a 17.18.040.'A.2a through e, and '1'7r18.040.E.5.a.i.~through iv'. regarding establishment of guidelines and standards for ' hi li e si de''devel opmLent,, I. ABSTRACT: The proposed amendments will ;`resul`t in .revisions to y s General Plan and r.,de with regard. to hillside'devel'opment. The';ht�opased changes have com€;ahout; s a result of staff', preparation of a` Hillside L`.a4e?6pment Ordinance. =` This report then, will discuss the background and developent of tar: proposed Ordinance. % ` In addition, it- will discuss the framewrd of the document, including the use of,design guidelines ' and minimum standardis, Tho',11 report- then outlines.'the ,06st' significant provisiors'.,,contafhed in the Grdiaance which include', revising the deFinit'!on of hillside fh—A percent to 10, percent, -,� restricting developr�nt trca�r "sl,cpes 36 per�ce0t .or- g"reater,, `„ requiring the use of alternative grading, and stmttural techniques in hiTl4ide arias, lim tang possible densities`haled on percent" sloi.i% allowing 'the tr•ansfar of development credits and .including a building ersvelope standard to limit ,maximum building haight. - ITEMS D &. E E. 4 ` I i PANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPk$9-438,ANQ DCA 89-02 December f3, 1989 Page 2 ' II. BACKGROUND: A. General: ,For.,the.,past six (0) months, City staff has_,been, won ng with'"tie planning Coiimmission vthe,; Etiiwanda North , Consortium and members of the development co►s'uniiy to ii°d development°of a ,hillsidefdevel'opment>ordinance. The intent of the proposed ordinance"is to further.'define and impleMent the goals and objectives of the General Plan,. ,minmize afire adverse Affects of grading, establish a mechani,sni:to. avoid grading in.enviro;iinentalTy sensitive areas acid to providg',for the safety and welfare of the'ca�mnunity while.!a5lowing��for` the reasonable dEy. op+ ;�w of the hand'. The development of-these, proposed standards- and guidelines are based on the'`goalsand•.objectives of the General PI an Grading Committ2€ and.�Plannirg Commission .poT9cies, ',input from various City'divisionsi and. staff's research, and;a6VSis of standards and criteria r,used in other'c nities, in addition, .a number of P.tinning. Commission.-46rksh4s and informal meetings',were held with members of the de�ieiopment community to discussJrovisians of the ordinance As. a ',result of the above 'review, it was ;detei'mined that' „ provisions within the General Plan regarding the,NVdfinitio,- of `hillside and the. moximuM, -,slope;: gradient. , to aildw ;. development should be,revisdd .to�Se more in, keeping•with the. ultimate goal, and objkOves` of the General plan and td better protect $he; c publ health, safety and'-welfare'. Also, with the additiow of the proposed Hillside bevelopent Ordiii'ance, Chapter. Lk. of the Development,Code, changes tc: reS,e,"teal, sections;-. of.. he Code �ei11 be .raqutred for cpnsistency. B. DoWr%ent Revision., Based on information cb'tainO frv,�,tie a o�ve ffij:icy-inputs and direction rx.i:eived from w_ Planning"Comymission at their Meeting o Qctnber 25, ,298ih, staff has rrIvJsc the document as shown. in,i the final -draft. Y j Addittons have, been highlighted in "Id and worong`010 be, :> removed struck Out. The,s;,n�,-ficant chenges to the dui ume'nt include the proti6siop of :addtir,3a1 .language and graphics., which provide ;mare.,.,, spe if;>> direction, as welnl as the, additia�i of" f new criteria,., The significant ,rfdwr,criterfa added include ,the folIowini,: the addition of new, filing requirement_ then posmfl!1,J for t0ia,use of alternative conventional gr ng , C. 7tJ r PLA 41MG COVEN MION SIAFe REPORT 7 f GPA 8943D AND DCA 8942 December 13, +1989 ' Page 3' jj t� techniques' in limited situations in . slope`% zones 2 (5-7.4 percents;and 3 ($-1a.9 percentl ana" a rev;;sian to the building envelope=to alley a IV height, of 30 feet jm ala cases, In adds Lion co=-riseabnve, thy:dotfifti nt framework has been revised and some of .'the r ri:teria!, previously written as standards. have been re-writtet as guidelines.,, The majority of these changes have involved site design and architectural considerations,. III'L ANALY, 5: } N. General-: Within a*.he framewa?k-.of the proposed `ordinance, as c ;design guidelines and related minimum development standards are provided. The design guidelines are i'6tended to provide direction and encourage innovative and alternative development solutions. Based upon these guidelines,'a set of development standards have been" provided to ,give more specific direction and to set minimumacceptable criteria. Because -it is difficult to' predetermine all of t�e�'possible conditions which could arise in the hillside area Until specific studies are -'completed, the ordinc attempts to describe generally the expected quality and, level of acceptable 1,Ppacts of any resulting hillside development. The purpose is to provide. flexibility and to allow for creative design solutions ghats meet the.,intent of the goals And objectives of the grdinance. ; The pE�jposed ordinance addresses .,all f factors related" to hillside development including site _design, driveway, and [ roadway design, architectitre.".1,andscap-ing.r_a w IT as grading,"'- and drainage. Thf: most Tsignificant prowisions'�in_ the ,7 ordinance involve increasing dovel'`4ment restrictions based on th i,perceFt slope, 'limiting possible densities based upon s'lopeSgradiehy, allowing the transfer of development-tredi:ts, aid ( requi'ri�g more restrictive grading and structgral xeorMques . The following is an analysis of .these � provisionsc . (` 1. Revise the current definition%of hill"side to Include all 4� areaswith a rqxtural ii1oper of tpErCen or grea er The .topography"of the"-City is generally rthat s,,F a gently slop"ing inclined plane which projects from the base.'of44 the San Bernardino mountains in,a southerly. i#irezti(' natural slopes of eig�t�'PerCenj or. greater .generally occur 16 the narthern third of tit "Citty, an',,spher e 1 3 PLANNING C(MISSION STAFF REPORT GPAr 89438• AND OCA 89-02 December 13, 3989 Page 4 areas, which "include north Alta Loma and Ebiwanda 11.d6 Exhibit:, "A").1.; .In many, cases, slopes in the'loothills exceed 40 ipercent There are two .-Vocations where ..steeper- topography occurs in"the southern portion ofthe City,:-Radhi l ar�d d#rectiy'east"of"`Retlhil ark 7 P . _ ffased on ,revfiew of pNj6cts previousl,r approved wi-hin the, northern portion of the Cfitr; `grading Inas historically become a concern in ars'�s .with' na ural slopes "of eight (8`, per`cant or greater and has resulted in -Ogni ficant-a7t ration to the natural landforn i and an unattractive appearance. In order to avoid these adverse Oeffects, more recent projects appebved In the north Alta, Loma area have been I requi, ed'_ to use alterratfivr=techniques such as' limited jgradi.rig. for utilities and roadways only, padding out a m;gimum portion-of'the lot for the units.only,; as well as :the use of stEA-wall and spiJ,t<`level, construction. f � Additionally, existing "policies within the General41 an encourage;,ilevelopers to min.fiize the amount.of grading needed for dev TO"ment and"`utility construction, through design of pro3ect's., which are oriented to and fit the natural terrain. VP Therefore, in order to preserve the existing .sd6nic character of the north Alta Loma and rtiwanda'areas. and minimize the negative results of conVfn,tional grading techniques, the definition'of hillside 4 �1',WW be revised to include land :pith natural slot s of a g�'i, t },percent or greater. As a result, staff would refz;mg nd that the ',werdin3"of the Lana Resources policy 66;stained in the Environmental' Resources section of the General_ pion be revised as-"shown in,Exhibit- -and•'Iable.TY=.�" revised as shown, in Exhibit `D- " - A7 so "that related;sccti'ons of the Development Code he revised as shown in Exhibits "E-3 and E-4. � 2. Restrict development from slopes 30 percent•or greater Current provisions within the General Plan would allow development in hillside areas` on natural slopes up to 40 percent grade or a conditional. basis subject to environmental review. However, the likelihood far adverse endironmental and safety- impacts such as so.i1 erosion', landslides, flocd, fire, seisOt:.'and limited puDlie .service and'ti,mergency vehicle access increases signilficontly for slopes over 30 percents c r ` PL1N�l+u C11 aiti�7. Ttf�EPORT � G &39.05E:AWD DCA 89-IQZ December 13-, 19B9, Page 5 Additionally; the General. Plan ehcaurages,preservation r" and paintenance of. hillside ,ati<a" r. f=_.,_ecological, ed!cational 'and aestheiic pu�cosesj, including!protection of existing vegetation;> wildlife, ` soils, . geology,. drainage atternsr natural topography, "and scsnic. c6aract�„. .As a re�L<t, adverse .effects- to 00 comrwntity by call lnaring Rossible, dectelq ent on.-c-1,006s 30 percent or greater ;far outweighs the po sibl� ' development:5enef,is which may he derived: 'Therefore; in order to ensure•publfc safety and provide for the ben.fit, and welfare of the citizens ;of Rancho Cucamonga, fpxds. with. slopes of30. percent',rtr greaten ' should be:left na�oral to provide residents, and I the f region as a whole,;llvith i significant natural resource for -education, scani'L`. 'and 'recreational purposes. As a resuit, sty\ff would,"recom and that the wording with regard to.iNazimum develooableti slopes'contained in,the Geologic Nazards,section of the'r�iiblic Heatih and Safety element of the `'Genera'_µ Platt tie revised a� shp+J;� fin Exhibit "C" ai,dti,,Table IV-,,a reviscii as_-shown Afn, ANN& Exhibit "D-2". IW1.addit on, =.relate��, `.;s of thq°. Development Code: sho�Eld b� revised ,s` shown ?in . Exhibit "E-4.�� t .. 3. Revision of the Sio e✓p be-ye7on rnt:Guidelfne stand rds Table 1-2 contained with the .Environmental Resources section of the General Plan is proposed-for revision to ensure consistency with,the previoUSlyr Mentioned changes and to further ,promote and imp -went +.a goals and obJectives of the General Plan aii;r to pravide further clarificAti..on to,City policies The slope zone guidelines`i4ve been revised to require than special hillside architeettiral and design (; l tetkniques which psirimize grading tie=uailized in art li i eras wit!± a natu^a1 slope of -i� pe,gcent or greate.. Tht}se tr%ein ques could incl.udo ihii--V of 5p �t level foundat- bra st tt` walls and min1n1al`,`piMn-q for, the structures only. Limited use' of"coAventional grading will, be permitted .in Slope Zone 3 t8 to 14.9 percentl under certain limiting Cc di, ions,-for'examphe when the pr ta oject is Wthfn a ste, plan:ihich ncludes special �esi4n features such as a golf coursft or extensive open space. Additional zriterl� for development of,slopes,on 15 percent grade orjreate specified in slope zoHes 4 and 5. ( 4 4 rrt U _ C PLANNING C ISSI04 ,TUW REPORT GP&8A-DOB ANV ZM 89-62 r December 13,`1989 s Pr page 6 In;taddition, the, slope zone guidelines Also address those areas not specl-ficaily designatt?.as hillsj�ey but011 which, may bg in close pr cxi�rlity o'r haves� similar 5haradteristics_to-.hi-lTs-ido-aiveas.._-::pec-ificzX1y-,--Slope..., zone. 2 . C5 to 7.99 percent? Indicates that existing landforms within this ',-category are to retain. thoir natural character and as a result, daigr+ wect,Oques } wh??ch: redgce r minimize 'the appearafte of grading may be reouirr� ' � ` Therefore, I ,b W-2. in, the Endiron ental ReSourc s section of the �derveral Plan should be _revised as shown iKI Exhibit !V%Co(e should11 Addit onally •Section `17.18.04 of the— Development e revised to ensure consisteng1 as shr.n in Exhibit °E-V 4., Slop:'/Density land`capagit considerations. The proposed slope density, regulations''correlate the Intensity,of development to steepness of terrai;i as a means to- minimize, grading, protect siggnificant view corridors; limit the removal of vegiAati0n,. retainT the maximum amount of open space and to redu�lthe probable environmental and safety, impacts �Wch 'Will ,occur in hillside , areas including potential fire, orosio,0 flooding; geologic, seismic hazards', as well,.as access limitations., e intent, of the slope/density criteria, is to set "tspscific liMiting•capacii factors: Those factors limit ;he allowable-density on slopes 10 percent or greater in. -proportion to the steepness of,the slope and potential for significant adverse,,impacts.; - Staff's 40temilAti on of the.$1 an4 capacity factors Wasbased upon the goals and objectives of the General Plan a review of densities and resulting impacts of previous` development protects in the City, the concerns identified above and-A survey of the standards of other communities. t Using the slope density f`smla theta;:the total humoer of allowable .residential ��dwelling units- shalt - be. calculated based on the' total buildablty_land Brea within each slope category multiplied by the capacity, factor for each slope category, Bulldable area is defined as a contiguous area of the lot which i5 less thaq.<30 percen* in natural s ope,' or the area determindd, througk environmental studies and investigatioar<;,a`s buildable. 6! b JI �`• 'z`4 t,r PLANK-A! cOMISSTON STAFF REPORT GPI,69-M AND (l�A 84-02 December 13, 1989 Page T 5w - As a result, staff recommends that the siopeldensty f. criteria be incorporated info' the proposed ifillsid ;r Ordinance as it functions to further implement the provtsion:,�Hof the General.'pl an and as-a 'mij.ans wilt"which to limit'- potential impacts an steeper' , areal,. Additionally:=rejtted secti6t of thA Dcvel6 the t Core: 11.08 V� B and C have beer).revised as shown In Exhibits E-10" to ensur-6 consistency ,throughout the document. S. Allow transtransfi of Development Creditsa . The proposed ord;inxnce includes ,provisions to,'-alto transfer of development criteria frem an en�ri�onmentally sensitive area, which may, stAffer adverse impact's As a , J result of development, to a more,appropriate area,Iwhich can accommodate higher densities. Fl:,wever, the use of this provision .is subject lZo a,Developmeot Agreement J f and. r any other Appropriafe legal agreement, asawell as J an applicabldy 5pecifitr Plan and General ,, Fran Amendment. The intent':, %�zta preserve signf'jcant amounts of open space and encourage laarge scale master planning rather than incremental,,; piecemeal develo nent.`' G. Building Envelope to limQ maxirm h+ei2hc: Experience has shown that the curront height provisions contained iii 'the Development Code, 35 feet from average = grade, can rresuit'inwthe appearance of massive,ui',lding, bulk `particularly when viewed frog d9wnhi1l. TOIrefore, staff.;-has de rained that,.a more restricts fie height , limit seII "Uid to required which is ease:-to � and is ser.sftAV 't to. the natural slcpe. - Ba�ed as reviw-:.of typical building, constrrur tion. and ; Kit, ;with bui10ers in appiicatiwi ,of tfie� pfcposed standards, staff has found" that>:a 30-foot'h�++fight limit provides�,y,a reasonable area i.. wh;ch to co!lstr�vct a two ., 12, stoic structure'4Wy raiseu`d6iling$., Add tionall, ;4 the 15-foot height,' rimit and the= 5-de rea angle required on the,s de :levations and at .";he_fr;ant 'of the uphill sectip are i 4ended to nnnimiae the 'biocking 'of views, limit Vpe appearance of% lk aM ,ov rbuildino. between units. And,ail., the street front' _,_�_wdil as i:o encourage variation in unit placemdni p-°d architdCtUr�1 massing: C7'i S PLANNING CtFiI5SI0N STAFF REPORT GPQ.89-03B)AND: OCA 89.02 Decembeer 13, 1989 Payw d t The`x'Qight provisions are intended to apply"to -the main bulk and overalID Mass of the building.' Architectural enrichments -and ,variation$ in roof, -passing are encouraged. Provisions already, exist in the Cade to allow for considn_ra*ion of projections above the height limit. As a result of the addition of thisection, related sections of . the Develop en Code '�?s sh�Wn in Exhibits "E-4", -1t", and ,"E-10" wi'l, "have to be revised to ensure consistency: IV. ENVIROW,1ENTAL ASSESSMENT; Staff. has reviewed the Initial Study, , F4, ar1�"y,`anc� compre a Enviranmecrltal Checklist. i%art 11 of the Initial Study,,and has found that no significant environmental impacts will occur as a result of the, proposed General Plan Amendment 89-036 and Development Coda An4n'dment'89702. V. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GPA AND DCA1.,1 State'Ia*11reguires that the eva cPmen Code,, .e., Zoning Ordinance, 'be.toresistent with the General Plan (Section 6.Q60, Gov6rnment-Cade). if finings can be made to warrant the General Plan Amendments. then similar findings; should also -be made regarding the Deu�,lopnt Code Amendment yI. FACTS FOR FINDINGS, The proaosed amendments wfiti. At" have a signif�r. nt impact on tyre environment as evidenced �Ithe conclusions-and fin dings o. the Initial Study, Part IT 2, Th. �propo,5ed amendments,;will,prorate and further impl ement the goal; and cbjectives,:af tho General Plan by protecting the-'natural character of the Foothills, by limiting, the potential alteration to the nturaV landfonn and by ensuring the svfety health .and well-being of:- the comity through twr, ;:loft of development from areas With pot•3ntially-unsafe rf;V'.-. ental conditions including soil 'erosirn, landslide, seftwc, flood, fire, pollution, as welt as limited public service acces3, 3. proposed amp ndaenl' shall preserve the scenic'_character and.44inimile potential` negative aesthr:,"ric impacts af� a result t � -� r of-conventional gi,ading in the northern areas U-Zthe ft'v by revising the -defraition of hillside_ +_from 10 scent to, include land with ia,"itural .slope of 8'p":�:ent orl eater- t< _ J � b t vy ,ri PLANNING COMMISKIN,STAFF REPORT GPA 89-030 AND OCA 89-02 Deeember 13, 1989 Page 9 4. She amendments encourage the protection of natural areas for ecological, education and other scientific• purposes by restricting development from sensitive hillside areal and by _ encouraging a more sensitive treatment to the hand in the northern City and'sphere areas. S. The amendments `►rill preserve -the, foothills. at grades 30 percent .or,greater as a natural resource and will promote open space land uses., by restricting deveioAment, from significant features o� land such as rock outcroppings., ridgelines, sensitive wildlife h&bitats,' creekside or riparian woodlands, and view corridors:, 6. The amendments will avoid residential densities which exceed the capacity of the land and level of service that can reasonably be- `supplied by .limiting the intensity of development in hillside;arefs through the application.of the slope Jcapacity formula. 3. The amendments will encourage innovative" and sensitive development in the hillside areas through the provision of guidelines and standards which address sits design, driveway and roadway design, architecture, wr: Bs and fences, landscaping, grading and•drainage. 8. The amendments shal.1 limit the pot6ptia+ negative impacts on adjacent developed:>and undeveloped proparM e,,, ais the result of additional requirements'for hillside 4t eas. 9. The proposed amendments will result in 'm0n,imal impact to environmentally sensitive areas through the .use of transfer of development credits to areas which.-:are less sensitive. VII. CORRESPONDENCE: 'this item has been advertised in The Daily Report newspaper in a quarter page ad and notices posted in conspicuous public locations. -' V111. RECOMENDATION: Staff recommends that after considering n� ormat of n contained in the oral and w tten staff report and after hearing public testimony, the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolutions recommending approval of General plan Amendment 89-038 and Development Code Amendment 89-02 to the City Council, revising the definition of hillside to includeslope, of R percent grade or greater, restricting development from;`slapes, A th natural grades_ of 30 percent or greater, adopting the proposed Hillside Development Ordinance and revising related text and charts as necessary and issue.a';Hegative Decfaratian:. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF'R f 'T' GPA 89-03B AND,OCA 8942 December 13,,I9,89 r P,a"g`e 10 1 Res 11y s ted, Bu .Ci Ann l �BB:CN•ko 1 Attachments: Exhibit "A" STOOe Mao Exhibit Proposed:Text Revision to t3:e'`,� Environmental Resources Element /I Exhibit "C" - proposed Text Revisions.,,"--to the,'A ublic llea�ltb` and Safety Element Exhibit "D" - Propased'Bevisions Iz T61e IV-2' Exhibit k'E" Proposed Revisions.to tf*,DeVelOPme-Ot Cade Text Exhibit "E" Proposed Hi llside Development Ord i : e r' Chapter 17.24 try- 4 Resolution of Approval for 6en6rai Pt an Amendment 89-0 3 Resolution of Approval for Developr�eit 'Gsaie-A<Vndment: 89-02 j4 f C 1 a� Qi zQ y p°Oy IL MEW d -- --,; ; !i ~ w •� W 0 N •�•i•.•�uu•�I na.a t' JM 40 i uz CHAPTER u." NV RCESJCANO RESOURCES SECTION, P. cies 0. The Ci V jsbalI Encourage developers to 'minimize. through//prssg!r,szte.��PTanning; the.amourtt4fjts" grade`h!�,aed : for development and; utility '�i 'S CCns* r Ctil`rtt+ ° Every,' effort .should be ,made• a preserve r,.fhe . ex'fsting vegetative cover since tuts tor �r greatly ,edu�e�bath wind acid water soil erosion`: , ° Land should be yra�ed.and..,Jcjrdsca�ad in workable ; incremepts to avoid exposing vast,exposes of { bared � rth at any;^given time; ¢oweyer#`,.f the Soil, a�I tc-'remain:expose for more"lra�r tk�iriy w days t", -orary setliment.erosi'on control measure w i+ GnoGld $e re ired`:to protect disturbed ,treat. A variety of `different 'Contro measures are • = available �includinO"tf<e-fall°wing;. ., lfegetationt ;,For long ' term protection, particz[larly in LL tires :susceptablo,�ao �t ` erasion, sodding andtY¢ , planting.of shrusr perennia� grasses, aid , trees should be considered Tempor�ar,�measurez,are jntended, primarily to. protect the i ie ,durinu .and af"+r gradibg operations 'arl�, chile mare perina�ent cover is a, 111 ; ,�`umplas of such. treasures inc)ude 'to gg, mulchesk aitd'annual grasses,. f , Structural, These are man-Made' measures typically, desgnedo attenurte, the flow of runoff or to 'trap,sAdimentg Host;effective i when used in co�3u6cteon l+ith vegetative ,.k measures,'they, range-, imple#'temporary and strategica)ly plated straw vales-to more complex and el`a�`fia.e sedimentation basins. o qst{e'�'opmQnt In tN foothills, defined as Having ProQased Chinas super greater than. x0 8 penent should relate to .tha,'stope in order Ca "preserve the integr *y ,3f the i 1side minimize d?sruption`° of, natural_ `arm;:and �ie clustered to 'retie they_ slope i�'' order to preserve the-integri,ty of the hillside . minimize disruption. of natural ;;ground form,-"`and be.clustered to retain the maximum,amount csf:ApeJ7 spy�a,.(Slope variations in the`plannijig°.area are shown ,on Figure ;V-1 in the Geologic Hezards Section of Chapter, Y)' " I .w .j je excerpt, 'Page^ jV t u8« g C4 � SJ ?{ CHAPTER V PUBLIC HEALTH:AND SAF£TYAEOLOGIC HAZARDS SECTION ` SLOPE " The ,topography of the City' exists primartly.,as a gradual inc7ine � sotttherly direction' from ;the baSe:,of. tho San Bernardino mountains. With 'the = e:MOptioit of Red Hill slopes greater than 10% exist within theisph ere.of i:nfl,uence area north of the City l'imzts„; d,"tan exceed 40%,-: The'likelihood of some land c� _ turbinces such'- as soil erosion . and rrdes,. indreasess on-land"'with slopes'ekcee`ding, r _Q%. 'Development at_slopes;greater 'than. 30 percent _requires spec,ial engineering, desie"; features, also becomes difficult.to servo t th public services; and Pr000sed change i�'s more susceptfibTe to' landsl'de d hazards,. YAV�? d'g rtix! �td�¢' �t - - or greater are.cons ideeed to. be etcesslve and unsafe fur development, Figure V-1 illustrates the slope characteristics of tPe;`planw ng area., ERGS-?ON HAZARDS' Soil erosion is a�,furietion oaf soil type, as WeiI as slope;, rainfall iritenaity, endground-r„.ever. I¢ 75 aesthetically displeasing,-accuntafvmany dailars fit loss olf valuiblo soil', ,and oFte}induces evert, treater,; rates' ; of.', er05ian and sedimentation. 9ad1mentation is simply the accumulation of soil as'a, result of erogio0, Construction aciyities on ;a pdjor �cauge a erosion and, sedimentation' it is ' thry tgh ;the depositioir of eroded rsajl that iarosion and sedimentation 'call impose significant de4age, Sediment covers anal ruins laws,..rroads, and play areas. : It further reduces the hydraulic capacity of ditches, dralnsr man and.culverts, lakes, and' -trade water+ impoundments. This reduces their storage capacity and increases flood " `Potential. Soil •associations found in ' Rancho Cucamonga are mapped in Figure V-2. The main association, Tujunga4elhi and'' Tujunga-Soboba, are well-drained and are not very. susceptible to ,erbsit7n, although' the loose texture of. the Tujunga4elfhi,:can result in moderate erosion during strong winds. Potential erosipn hazards may likely occur from untreated, exposed soil in areas characterised' by the Friant-Escondido Association. TheQe areas are found in the footb`ills in the northern portion of the study area. r DI HUM Mq, jt � � I ' �l 4: CHAPTER-V 'PUBLIC .KALTH.AN? SAFETY/GEOLOGIC .HAZARDS SECTION •' r Regdi re special copstructiap' features in the �1 design 'of .tructtres where "site, 16vestigations confirm'Poteptialgeologic hazards,. o Sail:' defined as; fiav` co gdition`s that may z constrain developrrie�`t dEe rttcf sated I fugure� V- .f 2: J e "Frfat Escondido an&-Ramonar Arlington soil also-ciations are go L suitable.„ .for, on-sate waste-dater disposal;- Development not on public sealers within areas generally.defined as being e`itfiera;of" these`associations sha11, be permitted only after site specific investivations have been x; conducted that demonstrate the soils are`,suitable and the =dlaposai of wastewater will not degrade the subsurface tiafer ggalitiy. ' o The Tunjunga-belhi soi1"a;,snciation may, b�,Ve soil' bearing capacities that .,'cOVIA Time some developments. �Struct4res proposed -on '_th°s ,,soil type- should be -.0er(aitted. only' aftqkry a 'sate specific, investigation has:=been� 'perfprmed 'that. indicates the--Soi,,1s„can'ad`equateiy• support the weight of the structure. Proposed, Chance ° The C7ty �a17 not permit deYetapment trt areas where tb slope exceed3` -30 percent. These: areas-siial'•1 ,,remain natural because of 'the diffiiaultI of providing public," = servic emergeicy.services and road ac4m S. , 'On _pot ia. y 14nstable� slopes,. the, BU! ding Q � . Official �cwi='!� rre e preparation ofa det led foundation ' rovestigatian that gr�ading..` =and COnStrucL`idt( a$tivit'iSS'-b4."perfoi ned ve potential slope movement. � The 'City .Building Official and City,"Engineer shall•establish minimum setbacks aldng.,the,btuff, of the Curatt,nga Creek, ;as may be indicated„by sails report, to -minimize -property " damage, inju,.ries,Iand: possible loss of ]ife from fail4re, of the ground, Foundations should be set back from'Waterways- a sufficient distrance`to prevent ur►dercutting, This distance should be;determined by as soils angineer for.all, excerpt, a e v 5 A to' SLOPE/DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES Slope cao 0 " Zone Percent Natural Slope Guideline Less than i094 This is not a hillside condition. - Grading* with conventional ti fuily padded lots and terracing are acceptable. 2 10�- i9.9% Development with grading may occur,in this zone,but existing iondforms must retain their natural character. Padded building sites are permitted on these slopes, but split IeVel crehitec- turd(prototypes,with stacking and clustering are expected. 3 ZO% - 29.9 Special'hillside architectural and desiJjn techniques are ,re- ' quired within zone 3.' Architectural prototypes are expected to cynform to,the natural landform Mass grading;`,is to be dis- r_ouraged. a: 4 309 -39.9% Developrnent should not norrnaliy be apprpved within this zone, except far less visually prominent s(opesj and thpn only.in areas,where it con;be clearly dern6istrated that safety,EttVi- ronmentai and aesthetic'f impacts will be,.minimized. Only limited grading**is•expected. 5 Greater than 40:"0 This is an excessive slope aiid development strould'be prohibited for public safe#Y Purposes a d because of the difficulty of pro- viding services. *Movement for redistribution of earth over lorge areas. However, disruption of the landform, dramaa patt erns,p erns,and on site surface terrain and yegctafian hic,uldlbe aNaid ed< :::, *The movement of earth for small.projects s0c!i,'di.individual building foundations, driveways, I local roads,utility excavatlor, etc. �4 :,j �M1 CITY OF ]RANCHO CUCAMONGA ram. j PLANNING DIWSIOi+T Tip LE: `f EXHIBMd-f SCALD: � nI � r� rrL � L TAME Fit.2 SLOPE/bMLOPMEN`l-GUIO ELTNES Slope Percent 'Zone Natural Slope Guidelines, i 5 or Tess This, .is not a hillside condition. Gradingwith " conventional fully, padded lots and terracing is �. r£ accegtabie. 2 5 to %99 Develppment with grading is permitted it this zone st existing landforms must retain their, natural. character: Padded„ building sites ate peradtted, however, techniques such:as contoUr- grading, co*ined., ' slopes, limited" cut, and fill,, and split lever architectural 'prototypes; or padding for-the �`ructuxes only., may be required to reduce grading. Consideration of alternative conventional grading. techniques may be allowed. for' a .protect. within a• master plan -Oich includes special,' design. features, such as a. golf Corse, extensive open space, or significant use of green belts,or.paseoso 3 8 #a 14.99 this-,is a: hillside Condition. Special hillside architeetu,Pa ' and' design techniques that minimize ` grading .are required in; this zone. Architectural prototypes are expected to conform to .the' na,turaT •' landf�rm by using: techniques <autkr as split „lever 4 foundations of, greater .than U inches, .stern lealls', stacking and .clustering. Use " of alternit'ive . converttinnat' gradirg techniques may, be, donsiderid f1r limited portions of d ptbdec t within` , master' pi ri %ftich includes special design features, such .as 4 golf course, extensive ;open space or, significant 11$e of j greenbelts or paseos. 4 15 to 29.9 Developmnt withintis zone is limited to noq,re than the toss visualT prominert $ lopes« and;then oOly where i,t can be shown that, safety,• environrrertt,al and 4&ithetic irpats -can be min*ized. Use of larger Tots; variable --,setbacks , variable--u>buildino_ strv4tUtal techniques such'��A_s_ stepped,, pole foundations. are expected. Structures shalt blend with the nat.xrat environment through their ;shape, materials, j, Exhibit Dw2 i r ? — TABLE.,IV-,2 and color§,, Imp at of traffic and roadways- is to be minimized by following mitural .=toursy or us hg grade separatiovss 5 30 and over. '1his is an',excessive slope condition ,and 'development is i�i �prrohi4ited. � � r i �a t r rs.) .a Exhibit 4-Z 4} ' Y n r I Section 17,0$.010 5 r j\ 4. " Teehnieei Revlew:> Committee. Ibe 'technical RevIeTa 'Committ ; is } comprised of members o€ the 'do y Develop�,ient Tmepart on Planning, gmeermg, end Building and 5g_aty�Divisroh;,time Cuca onga . County Water Ihstrnet;file Fo 411 Piro l'rots.tioti bistrEc" nd the Sh1 i€f's Department.' IieView;by this L� nmittee will ooth ide;ntlEtti aach 4, not 1 limited to circulation,street-i� provbmentsrxight�of ray"ded eaPtin;utility easements; gradingt dralnage?l ciiitaes,std;m drain iq prove[�ients;uniform � building cods requirements,.security;fire,-Plo iw;emergenrrq recess location of fire, hydrants; water ,a& sewer line connect and' szzin wut�r x. . („ (` pltessmre; hermit fees, streetscapa anti' z "syspe strin�a snxT s'etaelcs;-'_ = : j6king; and_,requirements for environmental a raaressing. The Committee will require changes in.any dev2logment for compliance"with adopted Bodes and standards. They_mey also maize T-ecommendations to the Cif'; Pla:aner and Planning Cammisisda,on any .policy issuos"or areas not covered by existing codes and standards. 5. Grading Cori'flitte-e. The Grading Committee,i cortprisirg of represent4oves 1 of each Division of tine" Community Development Departrgent-wili consider 1 items such as, but not limited 16 :cut and;fill az�aas; drainage,and'florid control facilities;erosion etkrol;retaining tvalLs;and the effect of proposed " rading oA adjacent, properties, This=Co hmllttOD`will determilie. if 'the radicag Plan meets City grading gcidelines and policies,,, The decision of tW ' Grading Minmittee wilt be-forvjarded to the Cizc Planter or 1'Zennia Commission and will fie bash on E1 e"Hawke oriteria rat weak ao OeSiV4 adopted Gm4iftg Bra�eraeea ctr6l6ed!in tlme Ci i RillaiClc l3eve utent'. teee,Chapter<3,7.24. r, 4b eace"Je 3ftftawrie si#e p{err teekftiq'aee rind g 'sde_ier a gay e�,laoa astyb*s;g� ctasteas salb `ens shelf'': � s �Na€ regs, aa '_Ee e Lim,en3� lrsa U it &Bowed a stevt* by the 6bma ssrsiekryw[tere �a3ti gredi ueb "e where!§ sale a"M*Ad stek+ad}iereria a taa tiSias t icemen t to „ ilot w .reftrl slq o�dev*l"raeptt of vtw,s i t e: ifttert¢ ie t*O bUM. ti del be 014 # ed to fie the )feat# aHel't s&t gft&W be xft€fts t tvlrerewer pasasi 4'. (Refer: ;td her:fit ��i88x84i1-d 4ss regbr�. � seq�nmeft#� ikr trgsb3e Y ,i a fb} q;e i0afttr the_lm@ee gra dit-an fd eeact p e hard efte f by e4_efts.' retmftf appeaka ee tlta etrssei reseft�blee#b ebfttata a o-e ff� ♦ti`� �_� Fes- 1 t� CI N-: /JJ)/ S Cugpa1.41�.Oip 4e} fse gkaraetet a the nrzrel- terrain shams be @tsetv erevgr g�sib�er��hih�de at+cr�;ti►e ereatfatt a�ieve�ere�s� "b gels; ta ,be mitdsnted: However;wfyere teye}areas taeeessary; grads g eaaee¢ts t a �Faviaa var -Y in the steepness of Oar",and eenra�rr.- Edr Created slopes;either'ei at end`$4 they ere adgRee to readwega sham" he.graded its Leh a wed t�?a4:s�s andais�g aggearar�ee in tht graded - " stree�cege tkan engi`�eered e.r azbi€errn slapesr - (e} Wi{ resider dewel6pn qQ t3;gmift me*be pkefsned in meh a` way sa'as to•preserve and e:sk istas;pa " these seen f-mM peblie"� trees:'Alala;neteratx elines tet€st be re vael as a baekdrap .for homes ;and Wks iARW` pled to eaiaeeO erealed ftea wherever pessibi AFOL Ff} s cni ttrage mnasten nee e€slopes fare,msisn eantre+and aesthetics Empef+y shall be'faeated at the top of"the a "and, revegeto,%,n mw*be fnlA;lled,.by the eevelaperr s,r 1 tc r U; f h Section 17.08.050 f & The Prpleet contains streamside woodland assoc?ations, identified as a significant natural, resource in Figure IV-2 of th4�.. eneral'Plan, and,site investigations have .been completed, and mitigt(tion measures:-{proposed (including clustering),to mitigate impacts upon riparian community.` 4. The Prof ect is located on a_pate or contains a,structure or other feature which is designated as a historic landmark,and provision has been made for preservation of said landmark in accordance with the Historic Preservation Ordinance. S. The.Pro eet site deli noted b th_Cenersl.- ' j `Q- g � y.'` p._- Pisn-ss-I?i1Lsi3e-i'.esibential,or is a hHWde condition(defined as having natural slopes 8 percent or greater), and environmental studies have been conducted to determine land holding, ; capacity and ii�e development constraints, and the proposed density is no greater than two units per net buildable acre. 6. The Pr Det sitQ is designated by the:.General Plan as Open Space, and development has been concentrated to preserve open space,and the proposed density ie izagreater,than an average density of one unit per 40 aerec. 7. The Project,'promotes energy efficiene:/through the use of energy efficient building design (e.g., south facing windows, emrgy conserving building' materials and, appliances, etc.) and site planning (eg., east-west aligned units,landscaping for solarIaecess,etc.). 8.; The Project contains trees protected-by'the Rancho Cueamonga Municipal Code that are dorthy of preservation; an application for a tree removal" permit and report have been submitted and healthy trees are preserved through proper site planning and grading techniques., F. Land Use Conflicts The matrix.in 'Table 17.08.090-F indicates the conflicts that are presumed to exist between land uses. 1be types,of mitigatio t mca-cures listed in the following sections are the design tools that should be employed either separately or :n combination to> mitigate existing or potential land use conflicts. The Absolute Policies require that such conflicts be effectively mitigated in the Project design. 1. Land Use Conflici'Mitigation Measures (a) Open $'eee,_ Setbacks., By providing an open space,buffer between cony,.mg land uses conflicts can often be avoided. The width of the buff<_r required will depend on the severity of conflict and the extent of 139dscaping.: To work effectively, the ownership, use, and maintenance of the open space buffer must be clearly defined. (b) Landscaping and Topographic Chm gas. As perms of.an open space Buffer or as R treatment of land immediately adjacent to buildings, landscaping can be used to reduce conflicts. (c) Ilene plantings of evergreens can pravide a visual buffer. y (1) Sensitive landscaping can soften the slf�arp visual contrast between two abutting land uses'by subduing the differences in AOL architecture and bulk`and by providing a gradual,transition rather than �a harsh.e itween uses.- l� (2) Dense rowth of plants ,....a visuall a cal' but also can be used to discou a unw�intr4 andunsafe pedestrian ,or' bicycle access betty ?u -96- Exhibit Section 17.18.020 ri (e) Promote ground water recharge <: 4. Animal and'plan t life: (a) H�I�? to-fpreserve lands having biological significance esr�eciaily ripZ -Il Cwater reiatedl, areas and their assaeiate iood2aad vegetation. Cb? maintain bd . and reestablish, where feasible, natural vege4Ative coma s�nines a -do minant-liuid�eape,aiements unique to the Cjty Cc? Encourage retention of arees with significant native vegettian and habitat value, (d) Help to protect natural areas far ecologic, educational, and other scientific study pure-jses. 5. Environmental Design; (a) Protect and imp,%ove the scenic duality of the City. (b) Design buildings to minimize adverse environmental impacts and R' resource consumption. (e) Us�the relationship between guilt form and open space to strengthen the image and identity of the City. Section-17A8.024 Use lit�latio f A. The Hillside Residential District permits single residential dwellings either on. separate-lots or clustered together in a buildable area along With accessory strsetures only. Uses other than residential dwellings are deemed to be too intensive and not consistent With the General,Plan. B. The maximum dwalli.:g unit density may-not exceed two units per net buildable acre. C. knvironmental studies and investigations such asy but not Iimitca to,geological, hydrological, seismic,. slope and soil conditions, access/circulation, and biota research,shall be Conducted for any development in this District. Based on this information; the actual number of dwelling units'shall be determined.. IOtermining the buildable area of a site must also meet the performance development Criteria,in this vbapter. D. A precise site development plan showing lot layoutIf access; street design, building locations,building design, and grading,"must be"prepared in accordenee with the residential review procedures contained in Chapters 17�i6 and:17.08, in conjunction with any subdivision or development proposal in the Hillside: Residential.District. All such proposals must Comply with the design guidelines, vtssdn*.q.4d Absolute policies in Chapters 1.7.08 am liT.Y . [� � Fbdubzt: E— o Section 17.18.030 c4 Se,ection 17.18.040 , �j Section 1718.030 Site'Development ggpdations A. Minimum Parcel Size: No a�solute minimum pareGl widths and depths are required. Buildable area is considerel tG ae a contiguous area of the lot'which is: less than thirty(30) percent in natural slope or the area determined through:the environmental •studies and investigation as 'buildable and is subject to slope/capacity factor calculations contained in Section 17.24.08A. B. Setbacks: Front„side and rear setbacks shall be determined based upon the ^' precise development plan and environmental studies. z C. Building Height: BweRfts and'ether aeeessery struetares AM+ net!emeeed thft '-five (34 feet in everaii heightr Shall be consistent with the height, ' provisions eantninyed in Section 17.24.070.D1. D. Parking: See parking regulations contained in Chapter 17.1:2. Section 17.18.040 Development Performame Stan lards The following minimum performance standards ate required for any development within,, the Hillside Residential District. Necessary information shall be provided on or with the precise development plan to detormine compliance with these standards A. Soils/Grading 1. Grading of any site shall conform to the I&Hewft grading standards;based open the pereent of the nature* slaper standards ewtainod in: Section 17.24.050. W l;es3 then 1-0%t' Red4tribat£e3 of earth eyer merge areas n3&y he permitteedr Hewev+st saeh.grading shalt net di4rapt exis g land form,-major dMinage'pelteeMsrand areas ef-ftnifiear4 vereiatiarm 18r896s game gradtV, may eeeurr bat;3anet rma mast rehaise their naWra+ eharazterr Padded bQdit site"s may be aiiewted;but C eastem feWWO1e1Is; apHt #eev4 desipsr staekfng and pletsterhtg is •expeeted to raid;ate the r.oted {e} 29% BM%t Mesa wrath* is net Perms F@eeie+ hillside 4, arehiteetaret and des p teebMquea ai-e enpeeted 4ft erde-V is eenform; to the natars+lend fat-m7 (d} 389b 3&r8%t %veli�mento-and Mmited grading pan enly eeear Yt this ea tegerf if ia:can be�'elearly de eamenta+ and aesthetle impeets can be avoided: (e} Greater ithm, 40%* Bed inent and gradit is peel in tla?e slope e"eryL 2. All graded areas shall be protected front wind and water eroAc 4 through acceptable slope stabilization'methods such as planting,walls,or netting.. Exhibit B-4 s� �J l Section Design, 1 Dwelling .units kad, structures, shall be con.ratible with the naturalJ surroundings of thearea and,shan not dominate the natural on dronrnent. Exterior finishes of dweMng.uajts and structures should blend in with'nataral,' surroundings,by using earth tone d6lors and,avoiding reflective materials or finishes. 3.: Dw.lWng units and structures Shall be sited in a manner,that will Wf:, i�kta£il outward views from each unit; (W Preserve or enhance;vistas; particularly, those,seen from pubb places,,. (c) Preserve visually sign;ficsnt rock outcropping s9 .raturcii hydn�qogy,; native plant materials,and areas of visuat or historical significanc`e.= 4. In areas adjaeent to a ridgeline or in moderate slope areas, dwelling units' and structuures should be sited to: (a) Use the natural ridgeline'as&bai;kd6p,for structures; (b) Use landscape.plant materials as a backdrop;and S Ce1 ',Use,strueNre to maximize Cicnceaiment of cut slope. 5. Retaining WalWFences (a) Retaining`walls shall b6 voed#h Ilse€e4asiV maaterr be emstructeo in a mawr consistent mth the Pt�►isicass conta d in- bons I7.B4 Q7G.B„C arA G. _ J (14 Heak E - ene wa*;gear-*t net eaeecdi> ` i W#eel im ,own e.- ene watt per3et na4 Cn:,Aeed Qu M,height..miy ba ! E3 tata slepine wigs fide s*veet*Paeeesa er oth"eeri�s--Bute eetftntm, wglk en eat 9 ef- 'fit M h be t itt* _ Blessed:,yg tau in:* htv '-j r].. y E li 13t113sit "� s. Z. .. S "ion 17 18.Ot,� � F4}. eM �r ad4aee rr c Wks p of the. "ht {b} Exposed walls.and fences fairig roadways sht3t be no greater than five{5}feat in he g��t �e�ct:As t' neebesmrg ac seoust cal pctms as to km*the,intent of ttae Tcozse oi*Aexee, (c} Where retaining iialts,or fene2s faee roadways, they sha11 6e b�u3t, f' when feasibI4 of hatilrai ,materials indigenous to the Ranchq CucatnbngC,few {i e:� aek f€eing 4 t. .T J j{{ ti ,J ti r� S_ I e. ti Sty t� t �T 1 ! .y) 1"✓...mod- .. 2 � h'�•�.: ¢ �, lid Section 17.06.010 - 2. Projects of a limited size and scope which-do not n' eet the:above criteria may require an application for Minor Development Review as defined in Secticr,17.06.020._ 3. Residential construction involving four (4) or Iess dwelling units are subject to Design'Heviev►. The City.;Planner,shall review the project for eomplianee rdth the design ;onsiderations contained in rSection 17.06,010-E. The City" .;tanner may ze4uest modifications based on,the design criteria or may refer the project to the Design Review Committee C. Authori a. :nning Commission Review: Development/Design Review applications " which meat any of the following criteria shall ;require review -and; consideration by the Planning Commissioir' (a) Any project being proposed along Foothill Boulavard, Haven Avenue, or n:yx other Special Boulevards,as des^ribed cn tho Genets!Plan;and (br Projects whit!; ffdl within the sensitive land use,areas, or sensitive environmenWamzs;end (c) Alt p;ajec4s'which are master planned. As prescribed in Choate[ 17.2Q,030, Master PIans, once.the master plan has been approaeu by Cie Planning Commission and does not fall on a special boulevard may " ~ be approved by the City Planner: f (d) All additions that exceed 50% of the existing structure and meet r requirements of 1 and 2 shall require Planning Con-mission approval. (e)- All project,.;- requiring an EIR shall-require PiFianitg Contmi ssian' reviews. (f) All residential projects of more than four(4)dwelling units. fg) All projects within a hillside are%(defined as Yis�,g slopes eigl9t(8) , percent or greater), are subject to me w pux ea 1 to �ctian 17.24.020.B. The Pianiiiiig Commission is authorized to approve or deny applications and>" to impose ledsonable'conditions upon such appreval,subject to the right of appeal. Conditions may include,but shall not be limited to requirements for; open speces, screening-and buffering of udjacent,properties$. fences, and wails; requirernecds for installation and maintenance of landscaping" and erosion contvl measuress requirements for street improvements and dedications, Aegulation of "vehicular ingress and egress, and traffic circulation; regulation of sions;.regulation of,hou[s or other charaete::stiea_ of operation;:.requirements° for maintenance of la ndseap'vig and other improvements, estOlishtnent for maintenance "of landscaping and other improvements; establishment of development schedules or th,4e ?imps for performance or completion; and such other condiOnas as tine °CommLosion " may deem necessary to ensure -aompatibi ty with serrounding uses,. to preserve the public health; safety,.,and-welfare; and to enable the Commission to make the firth gS required by 5eetion.17.06.0204." -G7 Exhibit E-7 section 17.66.030 2. New structures not visible from public view and located on ;.he same assessor's parcel es an existing business or institution Said'structures shall' not result"in an increase of more than 50%of'the floor'area of the existing f` buildings,or 10;900 square feet,whichever.is less. 3. New construction,expansion;"or significant reeoiistruction of parking lots. 4. The';establish menY'and/or construction of,ar, outdoor"storage area4 on the same"sjte,ss,and in-conjunction with;an existia-ig bus ness.- 5. The construction end/or placement of`silos, satellite dishs,antennas, water tanks, roof or ground mounted equipment visible from public view,or similar y structures and.equipment as determined by the City Planner., , i 6. Projects which may requim review per Sectioh 17.24.020.C. D. Applicationa An application for a Minor°Developeeht Review shall be filed with the Planning,,Division in 9,r!nanner prescribed by the bily Planner. E. Deveic,, i'mt/Desis �Aevibyr, Applications involving the construction,of ,new b riidings+r buiid's g additions may be referred to'the Development/Design.lieview Committees f�,,F futher review,as-provided for in Section 17.06.QIO' F. FindinD•1'`lbe City Planner shall make the,fol:owi. `findmgs'hefore" granting apr.-oval of a Minor Development,Review application: 1. Than the proposed `project is consistent` with tht+ objectives,.of the Development Code, and the purposes "of the district in" ihich 4he site is located. v 2'. at he proposed project together with the conditions applicable'thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health,safety,or welfare,of materially injurious.to properties or,improvements in,the vicinity. 3 7bat the proposed project;ss in compliance with,each of the applied-Ole provisionm of the Nvelopmerit Code.,- 4. That the proposed project is consistent with the General Play,, G. New Applications following Denial. Following the denial of a Minor Deiielopment Review,application,no aplailaation for the same or substantially the same use or the same or substantially the same site chall be filed within one year-from the, date of.denial. Seetion 17.0&030, ReeidentiffrGrowtti ecnent l iecr sstetn A. Scope and Exemptions. This Section shall apply to433.residential development Projects which will result in the subdivision of residential lets and/or the constr4etiun of.ni)sv residential dwelling units,and mobile home parks. 1However , " the following ppjects shall be so' ifically exempt frosty the prI visions"of, this" Section:- E4 bi h E-8 77, TABLE 17.08.040 �B BASIC DEYELt?P RE MENT STANDARDS(CONTINUED) 'v SIDENTIAL fi' 1LDING SEPARATIONS: EIi0N1TTOFRON NaN/R ZS 30 30 30 rVIIA N/R .NlR 1015 .0 ERAGE ', (PS FZ555 40% SOWr 50%, 30_*M '' ;ACE REQUIRED: PRTVATLOPENSPACE 4063 t,'NUR�,"1006 1 NIR i00/150 2251ISO I50(I00 350/100 - (GROUNDFLOORI UPPER STORY Ul�'ii) � COMMONOPENSPACE (A) - N!R r N/R NLR ' 3096 308r: r "34% IMINIMUM ..,.'jig USABLE OPEN SPACE '(A) J.7-d555 BORe 405L "3596 359It 3S7r -� (PRIVATERCOMMON) �; RECREATION ARBA/FACILITY 1 N/R NIR N!R "REQUIRI PERSEC.1708040 0 1_;ANDSCAPING (0) (G) � (0) BEQUlREDPERSEC 17.01.040.F -e "'RSaIIdGta'NDNECMSARYIMSBCONDARY,SiRF'��C3ANDARTB ALSANOCI HILISIDEAREA3 SIIALLsaDmemwr.oNmaf .LQPEICAPACdYFACPDR,COi\'StdtIEU IN SECTION 17.2A 080�,. ; EXCLUDINGLANIDNECESSARYFDRSECONDA f S RE2TSANDARjf33C4LS B. AS MEASURED FROM ULnMATECURBFACEONPyBLICORMIVATES7RESft, C. VARIABViVRONTYARDSALLOWEDYFASUAN 10SECTlON,17.0&040-0.1 D. AD,;IOFEEIIFADIAC^iNI'TPVLJ.ORLMDISTRICT. E IFSSTITAN'IBF£urFROMBfCKOFSIDEWALKREQVW.SSAUTO!AATICQARAMMOROM4EM F. LIMA'I SIORY.WMdN IOO;FEST OF VLOIML DWMICT FOR MULTWL'(1 FAPI1LY 6l VMI INGS. G. PERIMETERLANDSCAPINGANDINTER10R STREET TREES H. A S[NOLEFAMB 1 D$CACHED DWELY tNO.EESS TH 1000 5Q FT,MAY EF 1(t1T1;C3Iali WIM-NADEVE OPMENt'EXHIBITSINNOVATIVEQUALITIESINTRAcr PLOT,AND,MCHTTECTURAL DESIGN TOROUPHTHEAPPROVAI;:�i^A CONDITIONAL US$E'E�MII. L SENIOR CMZEN PRO-Mcm ARE EXEM3TED FROM l3EQUltdEb£ANIL - J TOASSURETHATSMALLERUNII AREN(7P'�NCE�RATSDINANY`ONEAREAORF�fl, iltsFoLLOWiN(TPERCEM'A�ELIMR'AYIOMSOFTtmTOTALH17M8FRlb UNITES!°.,S4I4.APP1Y; IO PERCUMFOR M:P.CMNCYATUDIO AND 3S PERCW FDRON8 WM'OOM ORI';'j$fD 3S PPdMCENT COMBINED.sUB)ECi'TOAe0NC11'tONALUSEPTRMIT.7'-MK.ANFBNa�,..�5S14N?4AY. AUMC)RUEAML-AA,, MRATOOFEFFYCMNCYOKON&BMRg3MUNiI3WH6Nle'DEVF3OPMEA7C y� EXMIEti'SINNOVATIVE 918SIGNQUALTMAND.ABALANCE�'.SXOFUpl(7SIZESANDTYPES : ❑ ,' y K IN Ii1IS31OS AcZEAS..It831iRT31 RAM B.BLi&>T=T03U AS SIB PPR§&CIYOFI 17.4.070.D.1. .4 'I � f t, Ik i. Y 9 , } # l� F`acfL�3a E=9 r if TABLE 17,08.tl40.C OPTIONAL DtOi .5fANDg3t7S(C(7N� D) ',` RESIDENTIAL BUH DItiG" SEPARATIONS: FltONPTOFRONT � ,'. # N11t NITf' N1R 10 10. ..SIR NJR N1R - � � ti HEIGHT WMITATIONS, (L) '; ! 35 35' 35 40 z a PR1VATEOFENSFACE �t�!NJR 3Q9113Q zE5/15o 159119Q 150/10Q (GROti,`1D F'LdOR1 UPPER STORY UNIT) COMMON OPEN SPACE (A) l STe:. for J5Riu 35�i 355b (MINIMUM q+� USABLEOPEi/SPACE (A) 60i a5'b aORr 4Q5U 4Q% (PRIVATE&CO' iON) `' RECREATION AREA/FACILITY N/R REQUIREI7PERSUANTTQ STS+tTO"117.0.5.040.G LAld13SCAPIiG; (P) REQUTR6�PERSUANT3pSECTION 17.08.Oa07 '. FRONT YARD.LANDSCAPIIVG REQUItiEDPEFISUAlYPT65ECTIONi?Qa09Q-E EF7d GY CONSZ VATION N1R' REQUIRED; PFRSUANTTO SELTION 17.O1.040•H 7, A. E[CLUD1N1 WND1�E49A11YFORSHCONDARYSXYtI93iSANDAIYIFSUIIG$ANDIN H&UMEAREAS SHALLBEEEMMmij'ONMMS1OPElCApAC'NFACIt;RC WMIt D INsscnONlP1A0T IIASVI2F�FROAf(}LTA(ATECUfC19FAC80NP=CANDPRIVATESRtMM REFL�TOTABLs17.08MO:.D FOR A!?D1'ITONAIS=ACI VaW.MAn(w. C. Lm I STORY WmaN L(Q FErr OR VLO.Q L lii5TB cr-PC5R 2J mizLBFAMS.�p9l$3 L4iQS. _ A ADDIQFFETIFADrACENI`TOVLLcatm1�7t=..: , OR TICOARAC�390MOPT GARAOSSMACKTSIT MT HUMM IFSIDB ENTRY GARdi73i USIv")1 SFrCPION 17.08.Q1O-L WTTTI!!i S1NS7IB PAM[:Y' D£I ACt�D/SEmtDErAcm DSV I3 OPIAFY�i; F �I,gNDSCAPIDICsANDiNT€RIORSCRVTrTRM& G. ASINC!M_F (ILYDET'ACIEDDWELLINdLSulTHAN9009.1pr Y aLitEQUIRQ THE,APFRO))AL-OF ACONDTION'ALUSIi1 PT'ktSdC3TONI7QSSi3O L 7ERO Ldr Vm owEL 3NGS F�D SE=`ON ISAdAa 1. REFER To IAI)LB 37.OS.040Cl AND TAII34317ttAQ4 , J SENi02"C7'.ZE2{PROJECCSARl3EA�tP($yi-$6A4i K DO ASSURESFLATa1+L1i3ERUN1?SABSNS2C '"ISFA1�xflQ(ANY0MARFAORPRQ=, Ifi�Fi7 io. (,woPFItw r-,0IIL1=ATIOid$OFTMTO'TALNf MMMOFUNITSSHALLAPPLY. 1OPcCTN))1R&PFi4Yl3CUD3�Ato 3fTPkY9RQtHCRQQbt'DR'UP PU'�4IRC1iTC1 ' i �i� CObSIItI�"E .,SVTU1?CI6bC% iD3�IFALiSYEP1 �LtC.TfffiPLATiYdT14000hO .IANkYAY �y AUPHORI7 S A GLIF,ATT�WATIO OF�{G9t ON�8R�476q UPJPfS F11R'N J►D MMBTTSINNOVA"T7 XCXQUAERMAND'ABALAMMMOFUPI[1'SIZ�ANDTYFt& .L INIiR.IAT11H ARM.RB10TPi'S'SOAMRSLLMITED7O3CA9SPEC�I8t97 STR IYON 17.24079jP.L. i r � ` ✓ ( Eibit E—ld FORAsk it w.wi) CI APTM 17A }- BICLSYDE €RE9f{ REGUI ATIONS Section m zcola Purpose and Intent These regulations are intended to further implement and define the goals and objectives of the General Plan, .to minimize adverse effects of grading= and to provide for the safety and benefit the welfare of the citizens of".Rancho Cucamonga while allowing for reasonable development of land,,,as expressed through the fol town 'purposes: I J� A. Provide spee f*e guidelines and,„s'aviards, for development in hillside 'areas'ta minial';4 the,adverse impacts of grading and to promote the goals and object s_ of the City of Ranehp' Cucamonga.'s. fiU Per al Flan Open Space„Conservation, and Design Elements; -and, a. Maintain an environmental ntistent with existing vegetation, wildlife,-soils, geology, slopes, and dratnAge p�,terns,` and .to preserve natural topography 'and scenic character, including swales, canyons} creeks, knolls, rock Outcrops, and,ridgeliads �K6never feasible.; and, C. Preserve and maintain existing wildlife-though the,retention "of significant natural habitat; and, D.. Encourage water conservWon. and m!rifer recharge, and r> E. Avoid 111deve'opment that w641d result in .fire, Rood,. slide, erasion, or other safety hazards; and r. Limit:-the extent of.gradio,alterations &kzd encourage sensitive- development rn the Hillside areas, through flexible design and innovative arrangement of building sites by 'utilizigg, increased int sixes, clusteringt, `. Y- a!d setback variations;aqd,� nu �r Y G. A4oid residential densi,tiesi whith exceed: the capacity of the stand and level of service, which can. reasonabTbe �ridefl and that generate ' traffic requiring extensive grading to provide adequate- street, access; and, H. Cncourpge developments which use de'sivable existing features of 'and such a atural vegetation viewsheds,'.gealogi`c and archaeological features; and r I. Protect natural areas for ecologic, educational, and other scientific study purposes; and d. Preserve and/or introduce plant moprial to protect,slopes from. soil erosion and i n si ae, = r'5 V .. pp age, p a er a natural watersk,,id, ra,r,,miae .fire;hazard and minimize the scarring and def6r,=tion of the natural,=land cape; und, c K. Limit the impact of-"dopes ion adjacent de%!alop"ad orr undtt ,hoped properties. Section:1=-1�44M Review Pe Fi i� dares All pso3ects within'a! hillside area (S percent slope, or, greater), including,. but pot united to Custm'"hm.e`deice t,` cps, and.tentative tracts, as,iieTl;as G2neral Plan aW ,lDevel� t trtstrict art ts, shall be subd t to Grading Committee review:with prsoval .Oy City staff., the City Planner, or Ptapning;Commission. A. City PlannerfReview The pity Planfler shalt reviet+''.a11 site development applications; Una.shall impose conditions d wh oemed appropriate, en one or more of the following activities`are proposed: .y 4,-. - I� filatural slopes whi0i are eig�lt percent fg%S or greater but less than fifteen percent (1n) on al-1 or part of a subject site, or on less Steep `l and which.may be' affected oy areas of greater sl;ope. (e.9 11at Orcel between or, adjaebnt to steep hillsidel. 2) or f7!t"spar excavations equal."to owNxceeding 3 feet f but less than 5 feet its verth al aepth, at their,deepest point measured from the natural graunci surface, 3) Fe `e�4av��i4ns "ar ft.1 ; 6r anyv combination thereof, equal to or exceeding 100 tubs' %)f you y�/u 1�00 cubic,yards. B. Planning,' P1ar�rting ,Gart�trrissien sha11 ;i review site development ap ; rCons and 3mp� e conditions deemed appropriate When one or more of the Ufa �i �► 111activities 4,;1eproposed: 1) Natural slopes equal to or greater than 15 percent on all ' u p or part of a subject site ) For fills,or excau"s ion equal to or exceeding 5 feet in vertical depth at 'thefr deepest' po�:ffk measured frarit the nat(Cral grirund: r surface. )� 0'_ 3) For excavation$ or fills or any combination thereat•', equal to or exceading,1500 cubic yards. 4) Any excavation or fill %Mch :rill encroach onto or 41 ter`a natural drainage channel ot^' watercourse. ` ("Should -be prohibited unless alternate drainage is provided;.) -- "� 6) Any other proposal referred to the planrrin, CsistRsti ssion by j the Grading Com:irittee or City Planner. r. C, Exceptions Projects which are .'limited in scope (e.g,, regradvng of yard areas,, pool/spa construction, additions to existing; structures and/or construction of accessory structures ub-ch are less than 2$0 square feet) and on s�epes,less than 291;} may be deferred to wegos re eRV staff level review and approval by the CiV Planner, Howevert projects which require gradi rig of large,flat areas, inc1q,4ip9,but not 1104ed to such items as 'sus b as teniais courts'or "riding rings eie: : #q h 1s#de' areas shall be reviewed by the City-Planner, or e2 r,,e ferrvd to the Planning Commission if detormined necessary-W the City Planner: D. U ambigu4�y arises, concerning,JnterprPtatiort of the provisions contained in Sections 1i.\'4 010 through 17,24.MQ,' it th$s SaWoii #V` shall be reviewed by the City ��Per to determine MMP1iance with,the .provisions contained within the or he may refer it to the Planning Commission for consideration. Section, 17.124.0M Appl ici jiorn Filing Etequil ewnts +� { A. A natural features map,. which shall' ideintify all ei;sting slope banks, ridgelines, canyons, natural drainage coursim,, Fed. allyi�ra`agnized blue Tine streams, rock outcroppings, and existing vF,getation °.Als4depicted shall be landslides and other existing geologic ttaaards.; 1 8. A conceptual 9a adirig pl$r,�`1i �rCh shal'`r include the following items in addition to those required as part of the :Submittal Requirement Checklist: 1? A legend with appropriate, symbols which should i net ude; but not be l kited to the f01TowiRg ice;top of w611; top of c►:rb, high point, low point, elevation of significant trees, spotelevations, pad and finished floor elevations, And hange in direction of drainage. 2) A separate. rasp with proposed fill areas Colored in green and cut areas in red, witPr areas where cut and fl"l exceeai'depths established in the hillside development guidelines and sta-ndards clearly shown'. ; err 4 Additionally, the areas of cut and filly,calculated as a percentaqg of the,: AM total site area, shall Lye included an the plan. . .ry 3) Contqurs rshall .be shoe for existing and`'natUral ]and conditions and proposed, work. Existing contours shall be depicted with a< dashed line. with :wary�f3fth._zontobr._darken,_:,and+-propbsed>�ont tr_SI;slzal� be-.. depicted as above except with a solid. Iight line. Contours,shall bs shown according to the following schedule% Natural Slope { Maximum Interval Feat c 2% or 'less to i9.9% 2 .201 + 5 C A ., conceptual �eainage and flokid control facilities map describing planned drx�.nage improvements. u D. A Slope Analysfi Map for the purpa5e\of'determining the amount and location of land as it exists in its natural state falling into each slope category as spedfied.belok# naSea #a 5eft$99 41;46r�997,N:2 For the slope map, the applicant shall use a base topographical 'Al p of the subiect site, prepared and signed by a registered' civil engineer or If5ensed land surveyor which shall ,have a scale of not less than one and a tong interval of not sire than two (2) feet providedl�itat.theJ:cntour in'terval,,MAY be five;(5) feelt�when the slope f" mare than 01. This, topographical map iha11 include. `o,all . adjoining properties rite n 150' feet: of the site boundarlas. QeMiate slope bands in'-�the range tit zero (61 up to five `r percent, fitt0 (5) up to tent (10) percent, ten (10) ttp to fifteen (15) percent, fifteen (15) up to twenty (20) percent, :twenty, 120) up to twenty-five, (25) percent, twenty-five (25) up; to thirty (30) percent, and thirty (301'p1ment or greater. chat; Includes or be asasempanied Oy a tabulation`'of the land area in each slope category, specified in acres. (�V .w PNLY The exact method for computing the percent slope and area by percent slope category. shoul Ibe sufficiently described and presented so that a review can be readily made. also, a heavy, solid line indicating11 the eight (8) " percent grade, differential shall. be clearly Barked on the`plan, :and an additional C` y of the crap shall be su .;,itted with the slope percentage categories depicted in Contrasting colors. E. Provide a sufficient aver,<of slope profile-to ,clearly illustrate the extent of the pr*po;ed�gr04ftg. #minimum of three (3) slope profiles shall'be included alth' the slope a aiysis. The slope profiles shall' 1)r, Be; drawn at the same scale and Udexed or keyed to the slope a;alysis`map, grading plan. and prdject site map, 2) Sw existing and iOroposbd topographystructures, and infrastructures. Proposed topography. strucWres, and infrastructures shall be dram WO a solid, heavy line. Existfag topography and features shall be dravm ►rith a thin or dashed line.. 3) The slope pro.Me shall extend far +entugh it..least one hundred and fifty feet, from the mject site boendary► to clearly show impact on adjacent ro er 1' P A '�Y• f 4) The prof ei,shall be drawn •el On those locatioata mf�%the project site where: a) Tm 'greatimt alteration, of existing ,topography i5 propo i "b) Ue UDSVIOMV, or talky development is praposed� c) The site is east Visible from surrounding land uses; and I d) At all site bound;rf es illustrating maximun and minim p Y 1 conditions, 5) At least two of the slope profiles shall be roughly parallel to each other and roughly, perpendicuilar"to existing contour lines. At least nave other slope profile .shall be°roughly at.a forty-five degree angle to the 'other slope profiles and existing sontodi 'tides. F. Bath the slo e;analysis and slope-profiles shall pe stanoed and signed by either a regislaered landscape architect, civil engineer, ,or land', ?{, surveyor indic?ating the datuas, source, and scale of top.ographic,.data used in' the slope analysis and slope profiles, and attesting to the fact that the slope analysis and slope profiles have been accurately calculated and identified timmistent with provisions contained in Sections 17.24.030 0 and E. 6. A geologic and 'soils report, prepared ;by an approved soils engineering firm and, in-suffi`c;ent detail t<<substanti'ate and support the design concepts presented in the applicatioh: Submitted. Additional environmental studies and Investigations,! such as, `but not. -limited to hydrologic, seismf.c, access/circulation, and biota research r may also he required in order to help in the Zd*ihaLton of. the buildable area of a % site. Ha A statement of,conditions ,for ultimate owership and maintenance of all parts of the development including straets, structures and open space. 1. In the event that no grading is proposed, i.e., cusp lot subdivision, a ss'tat=`nt to=that effect shall be filed with a plan which Shows possible futov hoarse plotting, lot grading, that dal•tneatats t ag boviAaoy of an Wequately stied hutl°dtnq pad, drittgay Oesign,rand ;septic 'systenti location for each parcel proposed, to°bg prepared on a topographic map draws at the same scale as the conceptual grading, plant. as deserft ed iu Serstion 1144430 R _ abevep :< J. When unit development- is preVosed, illustrative buil'dicg ~` elevitims, that shay all, sides 0 the proposed structure(s) and A,i h accurately depict tie Wlding envelope for each tot, shall be.provided. — 3S K. The following items may be required if determined ►lecessary by the Grading .Committee, City�Pl anner, or Planning COMT ssion to aid in the a. analysis of the proposed ; project, to illustrate existing or, proposed conditions or.,both: w 1) A topcpraphic; model; 2) A line of sight or view a,�aiysfr 3I Photographic renderings;, 4) Any other illustrative, technique determined necpssawky to { aid in review of a project. L. Exceptions t the filing retjtirements toe pro�ectts idet.4., tied in Sections 17.24.030d1 & C shall be d termineeJ by :the City Plamer, or My' be referred to the Planning COMission if (Merwiped necessary by the City Planner. - t Section 17.24.040 Definitions i BALANCE The cutting and filling of- a site,which does not require the expcN-,or import of earth material. BORRV-,- Earth'material acquired from an off-site location for'the use in grading on a site. CONTOUR - A line dram on a plan which -connects, all :points of equal elevation. CONTOUR GWING - A grading cor4ept designed to result in earth forms mich reseWle natural UrraPnn characteristics. Hari zontal and vertical curve variations are often used''-for slope barks. Contour grading -does not necessarily minimize tLe amount of cut and; fill occurring. CUT - The mechanical removal of earth materialAj s r Jie " A t; 5f l-li i'� 1".'�'tri.:.�1 y�;"� y 1�4.��•. ; Ct�7 AND'FIlE The excavating-,r, ;iart i mate al in do .place and, deppsiting of it as`fill in an adjacent pTaC�. UAYL1GWr LINE - The line b-e4we'fi, ffshedi!Orade and natural. �, terrain,drawn 'by corsnectin{.,at .paints where prapased contours meT. a Listing' cdntour5. EFFECTIM,,SiJL - 7he effective-vise al bift/voir a structera when teen, from a distance or from beIom � rss s�be►w t. Effiafloe big* onlaatt setae - trom star } From berioar 1 l i. ELEVATION - Height or dtstarce above sea,uvel�; ,fib ✓' ! EROSION -,,The proce35 by Which tho soil and rdck compondiit5 'of "the x ;- earth's trust Taro tcs"-*-aWa, and.,removed frown one place 'to another .by,natural f ' forces such as vind and water. EXPO RP - Excess earth material ftt is removed from a grading, pr.Wect and deposited.aff-site. FILL -- A deposit of earth material placed by artifWa'{ means. �'v f�l dJi:SC(,j�r—. i��.fR �J r WISH .GRADE. ..The final elevation of the ground surface after devel nt, which is in conformance nth tSre approved plan. grass, e€ the sifie wh}eh saowi;oms':to the''.:appvevee,pia - .__GRADING .= to bring' an-existing surface to a designed fcr.o by: ` excavat og, filling, or•smoothing operations. RefArs to.a paVicel of land or definable portion,thereof with average rise ar fa11 of eight :i8i;} peroent,or,greater: KNOLL - A small ,r9und hill or ftund. MASS^.GRADING The mvebmt of_Uri e,,gW.V0es of earth over,lame ar�ss. Disruption of ft ri 'af, `i ye mw-site surface terrain it;C 7. and often r�sul*� in successive Pa4st0rZWe c figaration. l ii<icmi�� Nor e'llwirratian5 of natural l sa ort5''my, e of aad"ng` *¢er tewrae#Rg an enUve p4ese 0 l andr tr MINIMAL GRADING - A grading.concept designed to mihWze`,kcavation and filling. All ows ti§ n�ovenWit of earth for .projects such as'indiv�lua1. . building foundations, dr•ivew4ys, lecal.?`roads and utility excavation. The concept;is associated with,:road3 conforming closely to natural contours°and with structures being built on natural terrain N TURAt SLOPS R slope which is, not mn-�aade A natural slope My retain natural 'vegetation Orirfg ,ad4acent grading; operat Os- or it may be ,. partially or copletely rived and rellanteC PAD - A level area created by grading -jtb acco adate development. fK 61 it :,I M k PpOMTidEldTIIpGC �A ridge or:hf17,. location which isyisible north"of. Wilson/24th streetItro�i a `ma�o,r dreriat secondary.or coilectot* street which as part oi' the skylines: Is teen as a:�ist�rrct edge-against a backdrdp of; d at least three; huhtSred 't300; feet hor�zodtally behirr'd.' it, a'r is, so 4ignated by the City'Rlanner, or P1ann'ing Car�ni'ssio►i based upon a.review.of the site. E rMountaain l�asia�t ' fxatoCogicei fa�ta P��►a fit tid � +F f-eaattwe'miz a9ata3 s ba�,�of �•.`r Rand wtktt It 300! aaa0tka6 it aae vkavad Own as y �arcoesar�y a�sotor �96uvta�a �JR' Wit' T 1., ' RIDGE A long.; narrow compicuous elevation of lard. SCAR A visible ut in a hiblside or ridge with slope greater than 1-1p2: 1 in Whica-a1i topsoil has been remoii d and vegetation will be unable to establish itself after a significant period of ti5 years), 44 q1�•,• i'� V• t'� l ^n1.`'.;:11:aitJ;'a 'Li,�r.J �c='a" L✓i ii. 'r Sl.OPc K an inclined ground surface, 'the Anclination pg whis, is, expressed as `a ratio of '(vertIcal distance rise)3,:,'(horfizorital d.istanGe (run)), or change 9n el.evatlon�j The percent of any 9iV slope` i.s aetermfine,;� by dividing the,rise by the runv-ipultiplied by 100EXAMPLE A, r;. k � 4 820 '�` �` Va�ct',Cfli OtORE:t,�1k r r 3 h1 ailevMICA(at") 4� !i®etfo�ytxd Clatance ww Contowit(►swo)' }`r SL x tad r, dil 3M V-CM - Y �f L }rr j i) t EXAMPLE 8 i Y rc �i �i✓�.+` ~ �l `..,", ,� .� o.>;��.Y not v-Isemv;3tsd calculailon Slca - S• - Sit W .+� SLOPE FORMULA Average Crass Slop®-SlcO&°k' ello0;=;.OS=OVA Slope Mo 3w/20'='1.so=`iso G C SLOPE, R M-MADE - A manufactured slope' consisting wha11',y c,t partially of either cut or filled material. SLOPE TRMSITIOM - -The area 'Where a" slope bank ftets' the natural terrain or a level graded aria either vertically or horizontalty. ts. - r Section 17.24.OSO WlllsidL6 Desisnatibn ` 3 .. The following shall serve as eneral standards fbr the`fibe establigh6d slope r zones to ensure that'devel t dill copplinqt the ovwalll character of t4he landform. In ®ncEer to pemit the extelnsio:t of a; l Cal desiot 'Camoot, the standards for we :be applied IImjtf4 pc ions. of thtk ;and$lacent zone. 'll Sio ;e Zone y Natur slope, Stan�darda - s f , 1 5 or le,s ittts' i5, not •a 'hillside, ccnditton, it Gwddidg `�withconvniiortai`: ful�jy`' :Padded �l lots and terracing is acceptabl, y '✓% 2: 5 to 7.99 4'jam:; t ith gradijg is {x` permitted in this zone but existinq j oo © tand�orms must retain!�the#r natural `` charipct�r. tt Padded building; sited ere permitted, howover, techniques . such as cokdi r,:gradi>tg, cOmbined` slopes, limited cut and, iilI i0d'. Split Teal architectural;., ,• prototypes,,, or 00d,ing for -the structures only; f be required t4 reduce grading. Constd Mtjon Qi a teMativa ccnmtlonai grading hniqks bd "O iou i:or Oo3e a.aasstar ,P1$n which iwc9 spec mi ~ae's gn feat ore$ sacs as a goR cr ,. onsive sp�c�; ors. Sign�i�icen�t,u o#' ;g ri boat&s ar secs, as rii:i? �=; ¢a9cytosir - . 1�7 I ' I q , 5 4 Q "a a t �tf ? 0 s � a �f ti+ ,Q aQ c 3 8 to 14•.9`'� - This is a 'hillside condition. Special <hill§ide aNhitettural and design techniques that Waafte gt�di� are required ern #his zone MIJ, egtciral prhtotypcs are expeeW 'to confo,rrn to ,:the natural landfom by'using teehni9ues such as Split level foundationv�,of greater than 19 inches, steep mails; .stacking; L, and clustering. 3' t � ` ;n - k4' a D : 'T User i alternative conventional, grading techniques may be Considered far ''^1 i�i ted portions"af;,a prrs.$ect bithln a tester plan Vhi�`-"-4'! ludes special 'Qjgrj features,`su%;w ,as a - — siynifican use af^ green' belts r - paseos. 's - 4 15 to :29.9 Development �;'Jthjn. this zone -is limited'`tax no more than the less visually prorttinent slopes, and Cheri duly where .it can be shown that t safety, .environ*ntal' and aesthetic, impacts can -be, minimized. Use .of larger ''tots, variable'44tb6c- and z Variable: 'building '> structural. , techniques such as stepped, or pole {� foundations are expected, Structures :shall blend with the, natural environment ..through their- shape...' fttorials, and colors. J « , Im act tr of P affic and croadwoys is to be minimized by fallowing, natural contours, separations4" 5 30 and over This is an ezcessive slope condition and dcvelapment'Is prohibited. \\ t 'tom Uzi Exa�les �r'f glad#� #q vaw#oe5 sl•epe eateg�w#es+ r Section 17.24 G66 guidelines � � ;_S ONLY These Hillside Development Guidelines are intended to facilitate the appropriate development of hillside areas. s4gn�f4sawn htTjsi•des as eut##aed 'n Seet#en PvQ9 10964-: These guidelines are ,iot Intended. to be strict standards, but rather, to provide direction to encourage development which is sensitive to the unique characteristics common to, hillside properties. ?'heir purpose is not to restrict an individual ,from proposing an innovative or alternative method of design in a . `zlside area, innovation is, in fact, encouraged as long as the end result is one which respects Me hillside and is consistent with the purposes expressed in this-section and in the goals and objectives of the General Plan. A. Site Design 1. Design of building sites, should be sensitive to the natural terrain. Structures should be located in such a way as to minimize necessary grading any to preserve natur6i features such as prominent knolls or. ridgelines THIS NOT THIS � � e °� BOYa3V13�atllt3Titi+`Ut �.' r G�. fiStwal Stop* g r,.01 Gr I I ,ovor'*wAvifted Not MIS #;exstsaa �re�ptta,ra s ry�y S y< PURPOSES. OILY. 2. preserve,vie;;;x^s of signiffeant visual t'eatures'as seen. from' both within and outside a hillside developeent. The foliaWing pravitims s�:3uld be taken into consideration: a) tuns 'should be oriented to allow viewl opportunities, although tucfi� views xiay be limited. ResidentiaV Orftacy sheOd :not be unreasonably s ic;rificed. �> THIS NOT THIS - ehongiag'thdr 7 masssiesg wlii boy{, al4tow bot ae views for the -4` E uphIN house near they win"wsa -- ob%ft"t"at of M the view foa the t*hils house b$ hk� significant public vista or views corridor as Seeepf? �-� f a secondary, collector or, m,ior ar#�sfal should be ,ro 3. projects should Incorporate clustering, variable setbacks, Multiple orientations and other site pITanning technriques to preserve open space, protect natural features and offer views to residents, t, • +Guest paficireg J R ad L'fum Pto nt knOO Adak Roof VMS f6w3At [�osn�itent k�tod nuturaf skims _ bet ��Gk�stofs i Aa o SM G4// a I 1 4. kfI40de areas Nhene4er possible, 'as based on the overall parcel configuration and orientationf� homes, should be designed,to front onto eastNest streets or should be ;plotted' to folIow the natural contours rather than fronting onto north/south streetSI r] 77 } 01. t i t NORI'E} _ 41 R - Mot'th-South.Lots and,Sahu Ate•ss 1 & "rt' S, Wier-e ppssible, graded areas should be d"signed iwith r, manufactured slopes lscated oh the uphIfAl side of stru-tures, thereby, hidin ., the slope behind the structure. fr`' ' Lsrc�ar marcuPa^R�aos{`sF�* s d' � d on tW upW shin of 3t�a actri�tues to fed"&, tha appmraran.• poi W from i KK rr THIS 6, i, r,1 f� T iy 5 n _ C7 , 6,' Clustering of devel`o ent throt gj� llransfer of Dwelling.1Umit Allocations should ,be €ncouraged-in environmentally: s hive area in order.. to reduce the! potential ror fire hazard and spread, erosion and. tcess-'runof¢ and to preserve existing, natural features and open spae. B. Dri vewys-arid Roadways!" 1 1. Driveways wiricle serve �ro�"than one .parcei are encouraged as a m.�thod of reducing luinnecessery grad ing,�Pavin' and site;disturbs�a e;;, r, G� 01 Aft 40 < (1 r a c ,s t ;{ , . S ou id rrt�tfprm to- tf} dataarai' ta_nt�goarn. Thy y should t►ot greatly'alter'''the, �s�hys Cal an' vispja, character of `a hillside oy crea ;ttg large 00tChes •'in' 'r<idgelines Or by defining ends straight abs ents,; Reducitd,road setrilans, �pli't"sections 4,�4 far ng bays should be cOnsidered'id the 1Ay-out;of hillside strpets o, reduce grading,, AvoW,runrift mot" op W"s i w_ tom,"�"^'A„�,:,s.�•� _. �t9 7E�RQ�i,�l��Q;���...0117@P.#Ga3aaltfe: .,vZ i�_;.__ - _ (� !• ,r.�®=� �`�r,r $OtrlQYMfl*f0 b*t_w**D'p@YPOntftWai" ,nd tVft ra%4 stag i w fa4ofost �mtwb�d baar&a-typk µ t. v t puk(h } _ PWFloamm kd�iQ'Esy I Jill Flatt4w aim J f, t. �S D RA �s ,t This Not#his rZ .� � :,-. '•'Round ctf..cut t, slope to.Contortn Unptural edge cQndltl"on p niour f 1,{ to the gf &;. lt�ltiii- Cut slope l 1 into hillside,_ ` err RoadwraY Rosdvvay Hound o}S:cut slopes , Remove smai:knob Kna4•rem i ., tcom road+ro cit3. aWn on ro9dway Cuts; ` 'AO'coo, tal4e® ;t �•�. natural~grade r Roadway ilisla F3osdt oY Aft Too;steep tosr plants;to heeamVmatats8isltect Ro cunt slop4s Spilt r 4 s4wtians to .5 r Masi 9xas ctiiito accamasda aecaraodats grade change onr iewal aneeial hlgtivea� 1e _ - - - . rit;zu {grade Natural grade t� Roadw ~ :.. rV Tj ldtere,"road construction is permitted n h11tside areas, tNe c extent of vegetation and visual di sruptiph should be i�i,�imized by the,ctimbined rise of, retaining structures and regrading .to yapprox,imatg the natural -slope. The vieat along a,^,,treet front-shoutd.create a pleasant appearance with a sense of open space "tid landscaping, Some techniques which can be-used include the ' following: W j a. !Utilize landform <p,1 anti n9, in order to- criiai;e a.'natural appearance and;provide'a sense of pr14acy. Q E 1• SS b. Reduce ttie impadt of grading and resulting retaining walls by creating visual interest with the combfndid dst of terraced o rfib aa11s ` landscaping p g and by .vary i rg the texture and patt2rH of sidewal ks 46d ;r Werial s. 11r 4'lanttsmg pea4aott o!3 ate d" retaining wag i v*o s"cxeen '`y '^ dw to too.dt mtdfift atall.'. Matt*but0i. �+ e r \. t u101 des t; 1$4,So",tar. _ �W4 two Y® to t omeat aritlt `Q�s r" 0,11 c. ; lifTe,e adjacent,to a,:tteep hillside, minimal grad%ng:ffor the r road and righ Oi way°,,wi't,) a transition to a natural landscape can be vial ized to providi. an open and more- rural ap'pearahce: c'r r 9.b i e 4 �• y 6 d rpj�o� � qt� �°�• �,: � tl �'ye�f,pe xry° ,, � ��a Vol`;� "1'x �n.� 1 `t�`.., fa f`k�•� x: a ..;^YI.. -ari r 41 ILI d_. R split roadway increases the amount and appearance,of landscap ng.and tht wedian ca6 be used to handle drainage. R '4 ilea ,yAG S 7 *r u4L 4. ,r Tt t � n C. ArchitecUre - 1 i. tha'€5rfa, 7flass46 profile tite 'individual buildings artd T archi5ll;etural featUres should': be designed t{ 141end ►ith tii natural terr&in, and preserve the character and'peofiie of ae natural shape. Sot* techniques 11 which may be considered 00 ud'e: y aY '$pAit pads, stepped footings, and grade separations to permit structure to step up the natural slope. f' CJ ,t ; r� u l i�S 4t { C w -- i; s!i IOUMation AdML- `"a �f�O�yrS',,�+?d8tFO1T rr- . String toIwHutg"/r �f n .} r, b} -Qetac.ing parts of i dwelling such as argaragg. i c) Avoid t}ie use of gable e-en is u:i downhill elevpansw The roof slope_•should be oriented -in the sari uirect. ps i:he natural , slope. �ewt Pre€tree eP €lat red Ad HPa `sV, Th1 > �I gets "f Roof slopes approximates that f G of h.Nlsids and follow, li ita d,�ectiort 8di!,b hugs ground form better. AV Pid farr3e en gable ds an aawnhiif efa,v84iprrs. _ Angoar forms which siopc,, in,opposite direction to stogie of,hill destroy tetstionsw of WSW*SW*and building and iacsease etNetiws Ouik. I f -1 7" o NLAI This f Larger root gectlons to parallel ; the average slope to Height limit-.. Suilftg eovei_ops Max,to be enforced Oeiot lhI I SO to of Large A��er slope ver4isa!ta" �®s IL i- of tiesAuk �'4'i � � �tJ813at.ottteuc 1 �J if � .1 D FT RA �ti d. Avoi`d large roo; ovC.rriahgs and cant levers on downhill elevations t ,reduce.�it m3ue• ,npe�rance fr !t.helev tax, I x ) d Terracing reduces bu* P'i 1 m 1i Effidiivs b �> Not thf ' Gar(lever maikdt building appear tatter,more o `4 EffectWs bW1c ' tF�7 tee a it „ Atlanei bulk detqi • ./ to�,antGOver H Smmasr ovarhmos.'for Indwfifuai Eftectrvo bt t ti41 floors or WkWows WV .4=k-up Mass and';Patscts against•. �� ancessive aialHgilt, 1 �l Addflonaf bulk. to :., ewassive 100f owrhan Effeetivo bulk tin U a- . 2. The design of the structure shall give consideration to the Tot's size and„configuration.in order to c"void the appearance of overbuilding; or crowding and to minimize the blocking of views. For°exW d. within a development, the majority of the units should :not be designed with,stnireum ' setback to minimum setback. 3. Avoidr large expanses of -,.single material on walls, roofs or pavi r), areas. Crea,,te interesting, sral.t scale patterns by breaieing-up - ._ II building mass, varyingltuilding materials and thrcigh destrM said placement of windows and doors. THIS T THIS Large roof areas broken UP ; Measlvo roof area is very visible in _ contrast to the natural slope MAturel materials,wood and windoam in small k➢crements create interesting small;scale patterns and ail add a some of scab Break up massk�g o4 sthsctural \ _~ ..i 4o move clos a is Lallot facade of one material nuterlaF Qh' Wrox mate the nab.ati rt-o". even N ted—\vkwr.-vs.weans f Stone foundations &nd fela tang was relate well to the grotind 4. Building materials and color schemes 'ilould ehtl; blend with the natural landscape. Treated wood or -wterial, of a k ^sC=l ke appearance, `having,M4 necessary fire retardant characteristics_are etiatllraged i for exterior :surfaces; Wherer exterior stucco is used, .it should have a final Y coat of integrated color in a muted earth tone. Contrasting tcoor acceerts a ` should be kept to a' linimura, particularly on the vied sick!. Ilse of other I natural rnaterials.s,t;..d as river rock is encouraged. rt i` tt 4x Avg gable ends on downh*I� a'vaton,S' �'Me 4 kof€ slept sha}i €el�ew "'i—slope of the natura} grade: t; Walis and Fences Walls and:•fences can be used to define a sense of place and create an attractive appearat�te: -however; tail -should not dodoate. a• viers -' and their height should be lim"ted adjacent to a street or traEl or within ;a rear yard. Terracing and extensive 7andscOpinkca reduce the effective talk. in addition, street front walls should incorporate varying design, and natural materials. and"dice-use of open view fencing is'entourQed so long as adequate public safety and residential privacy, is maintained'. N ci \ 4c 4 �.�,. 4�v ire t r LM d "'^-+....� r�.l p". ,� ..� ��;.�� r , `1 A F"•! ygflpR r;`CI'�/.¢"?5,1�'r ."�..'^i;�•a,�,iy "r st+a�`v`',u '.+' ;` '1'i !r B. `i P 1'•r4 „�C�.jt Ali jot, f,J 4+"�'}��� 11 tiY 5 I I _ � n IL Tig ,. to p1mu DstUl6M30. .. �f4�t�+vs ays:sgy,akawa AD�►en44Q thro ftncinr I �1 r i!"�hi6t bknds into natuttsi` r{r000"t Nto ���� \ 7 'SS 411Y.;T91t34k1kf�wam a g �'�" % C^ ,� ,�.�., a•�. vit8�si sand walN i°m 34 not d) Ckm Mt SOWEtim r tr 1) f� E. Landscaping $ / 1. Natural"I l an!form: planting should he used.- to soften manufactured slopes, r,-.Vuce`-impact• of dove'ropmen ` on steep slopes or) ridgelines,, and provide erosion control. `7s Imo THIS ° lant Landfoom s t�rega�er etisuai plaere-' � ,t�r - 'b -�'r'-irt IF of , NOT THIS ®nv,.qj,ttgnal piantmg r I_ -71 uti qu _jv Z. M"iiiain.j.a "vegetative 6 ckdrop" by ,replanting with native trees. r;e vegetation should sha4 screen structures to +;ne :extent'possible at maturity and preserve the appearance.of the natural A "iite. . G t Skyline Planting skylka' �� •� •.{Z�� ems' ,p ��, 3. In ordar.t€ rAn''dz -the.grading xtf I rgp flat arC+a� ap,d encouraP,t ater:consmvatftn 'aec'iriNdes large eapamsss`of 1016 grottirg grass in the front ark• side ar�91e Uiacen to a strut it dIsco+oraged. ,; enerally�< .. ao wre than 5 of the regcilY*�?d fn�a:.and:s= yem, s�!+o�aTa me plaai4ed with a l turf or grasz, 4 � r L ront*W, grading;"tecitniques sWd be r[sfv, tQ ,pirovict a variety of o4 t s? `-percers#agA ,ark sTapef direct:cis I to s t hree (3 di�iisioriat tir. iatlg mrisfting, aQ�mc rairo. The: %liming caC _ t ����1l ,, � r', 5; a. lard e4ps left by cut and fill operatics should be g iven a rounded appearance that c1 asely reSemh ies the natural contains of:,"f E� land,THIS �° THIS Small lrrwgular b Ar"i :{ ! accenictatrtt tito"ta�ti S of Chet so',OvvO j- t YsE-la;� 3n t,.6dseaping a 2a 90 as slops bank aucentuatoa tg:ad)irre+Create > cant �.fi usxduftforr a sil3ucai appearance more IC3Dtut3gc`pr�atures resiembfing nature � ecomo, very o � risl�lo Drainage—, G,j� Etsg�irooa^aed tap`' baftke f are atld'unr►attJrAt f � if 1I e►at radll ant!u9H1ven �stapaffi , 'sa of anv*e sn4 untYaeno 111cfeb d4wifaci3lred slopet` adjacent to Madwgs should be x4 dulated by -,uTftc?eO k"tffr;, iegraeoilq, to cmte, M1saa"Ri'r nteresi rrg &id,plrAsibj st tsM1 . THI sT:TS mety in banfc creAttts /r �,/� . t�Qedng re�as3ac:pre . atape batyrt x; of v 4o' rAy 6tlnsd9ca�s 4 r. ti, VII. 4 i. Where cut or_fill coRditians are cre�ted, sio v �t be varied ratfler than ;eft at a constant angle which may be ansta1bleuar, ' creates an utaiural, rigid, at appearance. 1 v'arylnq cut at 011 a6oP� A marw natural�tp�aaras�ea ,G 1� The angle:, of any" graded slope should be gradually adjusted to thl: angle of the natural terrain. f' N ti " Existing-Ovvelopment Propcsed`o4*Icpinont IMct b�under'y Variab 1�t" Natural grad' extensian Existing drainage deaiceTPis 1'latwai grade Not ods�`�```�- Combine slapos to Mora chsely approximate mitwal,grade. p P a sed t E Existing t T7 11.aCt t 'AndW - Prgw$G i siope eft I� Natural graft Flat Existing d� dwtc'§ ) Co ,g side©ptovlda a wide r bench l0f pe&atrlans saki equesttlen PBat�FaRl grate trails,aP a viWIO.tryout in tits lanmo^rs. `xlsting fiumfactw*4 eu ,'Whgre pad aed t4ericing grading-"te^�niques are �-t�i, . the pad can€igufatior, ehauid'be softened With var fable, undd)ating slopes ' crested to give/jd Wore 7easiv9 ond,natuwaT appearance. �j P i r �4 L qr' Tao of slop® 77 " lfgsbdbls alopq balk` '. l " r ��F t /Zt r f{ Straat VaHoais v antoeir;gat l3sist� lr. �, [f�s€utattpg �c+apa9 .,�.° �1rre�1�,�pn�r +r."anflqura!tpng s u,iatas.fis#+ssatyaral Uilts3 ra �rLviranm®r# _ _ 140T. ' e : Tim.-*Uwp+e f °`. standard sutAvislan rectangular pad ; '3 r i / Street StMot u1<'f trn9 si pasa.a eat9 tlstffi �StioXel6 a' produce rai aaa!';3ns4r3edve erer?xaeoM"t 1 `.tis la 2. Re*:a' raing 11s off, other support structures should be da49fied to'Wnfiaize theit visual iapact thraa�lt tea:heaigees:suc(h astterracing, h } , a:rib-walls, 4nd appr��la a landsa'��rig ^ t� It >r' Cribt;ikifj�jwoth piaretirig 3. Wi�ere .retain�`Mg, '�ruefxa�e r �egZairxed fbr'h lls,ae°�re�tr# , efforts should bey^'made to,�at rite them^irithC the iuunda i"ice }valis of the 111 adjacent, resi device and natural jut".-rtifi,C: should be used .r, canSunction, i l L ____--`-..-� 6. Di_ iitage t. }t 1. Where pess.ible, dr�aittage channels sfi'ou"i:�t ba placed in less visible locations$ aria 'more importagtly, should 'receive a' inaturallTzing ? treatment inc]udir+g 44ivcl rock, calored`scondrete and Tandscaping. so that fire structure_; appears as an integral Oart.of the"`ervirorynert�� concrete linear shall be used in addition to,, na.'razixig treatrtinnt. THIS, use op"a4ve racks ; a �'"��a�ie3car�tdxs+nsrt•+soede 1) ditch ti 4, If Y !+ wk, J 'A yy �j _ - L •^a�-L.i�r ?. Mural drainale courses should be Oreser�cd.and e�shanced Q tp theiiteet possible: Ramer that fillthg'thr irq, drie�age gr_`atur�s should ' be incgrporatW:'as rrt integral pant ofi th6 pro;I ,design in artier to enhance, x'ae o� rail quaZity,a-.* .aesthetics of,'a .Trt$e: ptromidt� 'attractiae open space ,= vistas; and to preserve the a�atueal.ci iracGrr of the aria. jL K 1w, s` Vo. wARt :1 2,°r n� ' "r°s'a i'• Q G r` .Y xr O "�• r9 dS" !; { r '(' e.F.4rUr'ue r eeje O i� e? �' ��`'iYgn 't"^ oEr•C�.�rrr�d b� ` `�.au+"`�`uy:�n8: , 74 .:415_ 1 1' �1. 'Trails . 1. Trails are. an integral; part of,a hillside area and :provide recreation areas for equestri,4n, hiking, and hiking us Thay/,ccgn als,� function as a means to,take uq grade dr to convey drainage. —.L ;n hillside,aread, .it is not always necessaiy to provide full� improvements for 'rai7.s. A more natural eioer%ence,may be acfiie�gd, and the awo nt of grading *ui,rad -can be reduced by pravi ing,,?iMinaI 'imps/rements in appropAate areas, such-assundevelopable, steep sLppes,.j` , ;4 t� Ilk GO p� L 4 y a.`r ti'i ram+ r,,'O., vkw p .. -.�, n rSS I5• t `> h Section 17,24.070 [Developant Stan&hndC Within the framework of previous these design guide. Ines the fallowing standards have been-, prepared to give more sper.,ific 'direction. Theie 7 r' minimum standards and shall apply to any use. e�evelopsfflt or al ter atio i, flf land as specified lit Section 17.24 6?3. A. Site t?sign 1. The width of a buildlg measured in the direction .of the slope st Al be minimized in order to limit the amount of cutting and filling and to 'beswer "fit" the boucle to the natural terrain. Nheime the aaatdwal grade of a bm0d�Rg site €s tweAly 00 pereeent er greaters tha bwtjdtng width of easy €wear 7 evel shall Fist ekeeed il, feetr THIS, BuiG�!irig•tWiis Black From -3:aQper Slopes&_Ravines on Milslde '1 a NOT THIS Building ft parIM01 r�ith ccns�a.;. Buildlrg<protrusion ° up/dowry Slope Occur o, ° f Knoiia or inset in"Hisid w J f � P G O 13"a ing is-P"Paimftular td contour j n r tj 2., In, steeper terrain (20% ,tope and greater), front yard setbacks may be reduced-to a"minVmum. of 20 feet from,back of curb or back of sidewall;=, whichever"', ii more restrictive, in 'order to minimize reap ya d grading. tea , .. 4 V. Driveways x Driveway grades above 1a.:percent may;be per up to a ' maximum''.,of 20 percent,� provided they are aligned wi th the natural-r. tours`-o;f the Zand, If determined necessrfn ter attieve site design and if a`ii safety �f r� considerations: have beenrsmet, to � e satisfaction of the Building and r.i4 j Officials. ,.Proper design canside ations.shall be employed, including suchf items as verticaV cuNes and parking land{pgs. b any case, parking, lanoinas r n shall be utilized on all .drives over 10 percent grade, a % 2. Driveways shall not be permitted which exceed,,twen (20 percent slope except that one length, not at the point of acci'st, offot more than tan (10) feet may have�a slops of. twenty-two (4) percent. 3. On driveways with •a >slope ;of tx{erity percent or. grpatgr, a coarse paving material or grooves for traction must be incorporated into the construction, These driveways shall not exceed 100 feet in length from bottom of approach to structure. 4. ',staining wails, not to exceed 4 (fear) feet in height shall be permi.ited for. so .j. stabilization adjacent`to a driveway, aithar h within the required street front seth.gck indUidual rataik, walls shalt tat xce+edd three (3) feet in height. neisd, terxuced mining:walls shill be utilize, which are sep4rabsd by a asinlm of three (3E) feet,;arni appropriate Iendscaping. -i : °WaeeRt .te drissawaysx slopes not greater than fifty� (5 ) percent for 2s3) will'be pejFMJtted. J 6. Driveways' shall 'enter public/private streets 4in.tain141g. adequate line-.Of-sight. ! 7. Within t� right»of-way, driveways shall' not he'`,sated -� within :5 19 feet of ark}! pre erty+'`9$�e. _Exceptions may h conSi�ered based on tat size, percertt,.sloQe lid use as a co6on �6oint} drivgway C. Roadways i 1. Where- retaining walls are proven to he absolu�ftly necPssap '°„ used adjacent to roadways or within street setbacks, they shall .be limited to three (3) feet in height in order` to avoid obs,tructicn of,Mtorist's and pedestrian's field of -view, atn& *o:,, creato, an ' aestheticollyr� pleasing streetscape. Atherwise terraced r&r piled structures<Oeta409 waves stall �e utilized which are separated by., minimum of tz a f3� feet~ aitd appropriate Landscaping. �(g,'aphic 116).� ; THIS &13-n r� y: r -Readwa s oh&V) to tho "'%o4 herd-Ro", `k6dxeed ty bead seet4ah 'spl4t seMoll ..axd p 1FW4 days shad -b ..e0A0,qe0e1 tx the `. t, layout of h:'49tde str&ets redvse gaed3agy, " = D. Architecture 1. The buildM4 'envel'op� i'nr all Struct4res shall ?ba as follows*, j1 a. Downhill, lot - A'` ** heft$t *f,V ffikt,as omrod iron finished grade Ct a r t se cic �exuding tarards_the i sem*- Rf the utiv The mxl;wm height at the side sets shaW1 :1 i>feet.ex dt up. twards the toter of'`the lot"at, a 4T d.-gres, ar'l Of 3h., �t! feet as wasared from f1h sko grade A raaa h+u�t ef, ? €R& its he#flat a e front sethauk- extehdlRg `up axd teaAr#A,a the, pear at t%e lot At t 46 .degree,. asglo; to a inAOM 'hQtght' of gS €eel ad? easxr fkm. Oxs'old Spa do', BUILD0414G ENVELOPE fOR DOWNHILL LOT, . rr ti . 4.1 #a0` QW"hill acts o#3 tear at#6mo6� ,, ,^ �x• �- 10 t/.. .>... ..,i R b.e+rzN..,k ..,1, ... .=_.r .. a,..,n....,. .rx .d.,,>,i ...,.�,., S,... n .. .... .,Y�.,x....., v. _ .z`°Y i tsii{ 'iat A t�ax.rr�s�I eight of„15 feet at the from; �y t �r setback `extending L and toviard the rear of �,hk �i.ot at a 45 degree angle to a; maximum'height of 3Q ,feet as Yaeisured from Xjtic;hed grade. A mi xiss ,hei Ott` 3, at the 'side setbacks'%A.ail i6 S'feet exien�li4ill uR towiN the`.center' of the 1 of at a 45 degree angle to;,a ssaxissum fieigiht�+ it 30 feet as aseasuresi f finishe d grade. 1 BUll.®6PdG ENVELOPE F0 UF6�I . LOT 1 � 30' id5a Min4mum stria setback` .,. Rent aethack Oat Mk1knum front setback 'a c. Cross slope `tots ` A mti '1 a#Slat,'bf 30 ff� as stared �r finished grade, apt thie frexrt setback; .. rtS ire°a ► of the. tie uaxi het0li+ .at, tt sl9 be '25 t 2rj extending t sms^d cen8ee� aria t'a• 'tot at a AS z �nSlc'4'to d ar insna of 30 feat ms measured f fin�islied grade.,,, 84A* kr "q V*Aents as, fay UPfa#} Old d6Wp�M Wn exaepe;,that ke�0" at went Yacd stems ba a6rese f;1;MtagQ $naide the s4de yard 9o;ba6ksv 1 y ,x SCE f t�, r , s w^. t ELF.P OFI CROSS.;LO-r sLi N i$ ;' b r�in3tst9lsn sDcR� sretback d. The abbe ,provisions awe.intended to apply to, #4 imin bulk and Overall mass of ttt� bpai'�ing, Arch! Oil enirfAiiih ts- and Variations in roof aassu x i4ons� above the .heicsht limits for t"krchitectural features coy be considered s'M t ta'the,prQvisians contain2d in y^ction-17,04.00j.I f. 24, Terrace the lbuildin t6 follow the slope: use roofs on Lower levels for the deck open spaces of upper levels Were decks are Provided, thW 9eahs shall be a minimum cif six (6) feet in width to provide. adequate usable area to effectively breakmU'p the mays-71 . z r: u � J ^`Cl � x•i e � i 5S%.-� THIS NOTTHIS' Terraced docks do not G e`= Overhanging decks' Increase building bulk ;make building. seem rlsora massive Effective bulk with or without docks, Effective bulk Building correcty fits Into the round andKigh profile bung minimizes effect on stan� -out on the hillside hillside Avoid dscks ba,�ing Use root"docks li a from dOW6f- !'A0 with�i level decks,side of building decks Tong polo supports 3r AYe;td barge expaRses of a"S*RgTe ma$epW ep waII5g 06e$5: OF paY Rg aReass Greate #nterest$Rgv sea}e PattepRs by bl°�ak W#}d Rg pass; YarytRg bui;diRg mater4als and thr�gh design and plasemeRt of w*Rdows and doeoss 3.. prnbide arxhitectural ,treatment to all sides of a structure. Elements 'of the architectural treatment used on the front facade shall be r -on o,� all s;des ,of ;"a s4iwicture '►Kfiexi additional emphasis on" J those elevations visible from-adjacent properties or public rights-of-w4y. , 4. Excavate undeeground'or utilize below grade rooms to,reduce effective bulk and to provide energy efficient and:environilientally desirable spaces. Hmver, the risible area of tilt building shall t mInfmizad 4ht el�h a co><1bined use of regrading and. lafx4scaping techWw—..-"' for le, thq, use . of, earth, berm arwn& the lower part of fi]'e""horse minima: ;lairger visui expanses of wall areas aRA fuustj s as a naturvl solar O tirng ato3d cooling �.' insulator. . Exterior-structura5upperts and` un ersides of floors"and decks not encloseq,by walls, xi31 May 'be approved,only if it iS proven t'rat no alternative type of �onstru;tion is .feasi.b, :;,and that firs 'safety and aesthetic'considei^ations have been adequately adjressed. j. 6. Architectural 4�figrs Uclgdi" building'orientation and to e placement, of doom 4inel'uding t_ //ige// rs� ;aM4i, igwz Oa'f1> be designed to --_ acc atE preva iitsg sout4ia�s� •�1y winds, as �eel1 .as. tits seasonal winds or , Santa Itna�s, �i�c�=getter l,ly c e,'(Nt'af e-,Oortheest. w 7. Residential developments; shall :bn copstr.t:tedl in sucti. a t. manner 11 so as to reduce the, patentfal" for sp-ad ,of brushfu;es"t<'9raugh by considerxMor of the f011c t°: atin t :�6'! ° hti�5 @ .eenstftat eri 5 i}gY2R a, f..=` the case of,='a 'coninict. re we restrictive provisions are Con tteei fitr the O fona Bti31dIng, Ode Or An, Fire manage t'PlanK; they—shall prevail. LL b. _Roofs ill be covered wi th not-�cbmbusti,hle maixerial s such as clay or concrete shbke; or tile. Opri ends shall shau he'stoppd in order to prevent bird rests cr otha,r combustible material 14�ging within the roof and to preclude entry ^¢ Jatrs 3r ' t�' . ' arrow@nt» dsereac'�t��ua �H Man"sowt 01 o 4f , c. Exterior Wa1'1 s shalt,1 " 9hed�d be s arfaced with anon c�uwtilale-or fi:we resistfive materials. Except a's otherwise provided Herein, exte;Rior walls .shall. exte6d'lto the ground- d. Balconies, patio "`roofsy eaves and'' a7her. similar overhangs shall be of non-coi*N.stibie constructign or shall be protected fire.- resistant material on 1iie underside or constructed with heavy•'timber rile ers and nominal.2"':4opd pr.1 i. 8';plywood decking, e, Plaspic,,webbing, split or'wools bamboo,: reed or straw like material s,. corrugated`, pi.sti#c of fibergl ass material's and similar flammable materials w$17 notf JQermitted for.-use on patio covers. f, ientsjor attics and: underfloor ami; must" be designed and located to minimize the Melihood' of_'spreading of:'fiee. Ieidiv dtal vent openings should not exceed ;one sgelare foot•."and shall 'oe covered with a m6h ` metal :screen :having openings hot ;exceeding r i/ , inch ,in any direction: Eave vents shall be position<�d :on"`fie enclosed- eaves naarvIfte roof edge rather, than in or near the ezxUlMor'wall s,a g. Chimneys shall tie provided with approved ,spark C arresters. 8. Exterior lighting shall be located ant shieidec! so as :to C not impact the ad3acent,,psaperty owners in terims,W glare a�� privacy; � E. Fencosy - - -- - -- - ---- - - - - — 1. Fences wi11, be allowed immediately Odjacent to structures;, to protide a private. outdoor area These fences shall be designed as an integral part of the building in, order des#gn sib as to minimize the visual impact on surrounding areas; The use-vf weed wa€��YngT ww3agfag #yew'er e$her�. epeA type.of i eWng ;#s eReeuwaged _E '. Walls and fences`shal'L ntegrate'materials and colors used in the steuctur°e`s facaae- _. Naturally occurring materials, such as river rock, shalt be used whenever pda,il-i r, 3. Wa1,is a6d�renci6,1` vis-fhle from the public right-of-Way. ,�vis�a] time shall be designed a �ncgrpa�, e'� rest,�_through variair�lon in, placement, ese of plataters, ;differing materials and Modulation. ,of tl c wall 1 plane. - rj F., LandscapingJ_ L., wandsuaping shall et# ae Pe setard&M spee�es.` Native. or naturalized'p.iants or' other plant species Oat blend naturally, .with' the Landscape shall be uti ized in"all areas with regiiied�lanting. are geweral'W fa�wedc 2. lit, fire sensitive atrew"i fire retardant plaint materials shall be utilized. . 3 10(�order to p 1 rQtect 's apes,fro soil eftsia" and.slippage _ and to facilitate significant, revegetation.i ai permanent irr gatiort system r shall be installed on all pl.ap�ed slo, s with regtait� pisati'ng« 4:aweuer, the emphasis shall be toward using plan ircterials that will eventually 'not need to be Water and ene4 °to"servation techniques. shall be u,+aiIized includi but a}ot`;li salted_ to sut items a$ s�isk„as drip irrigat"(on",and_. alluvial' rockscape. IJ 4,. Landscaping. shall be used to screen views 'of do�nslope elevations. Who-the structure height exceeds 26 feet from finished grade on At Itho do"Islope side, additional landscaping' will be- regOred ' and a landscaping and 40 at OR Alan shall be submitted for review with, the submittal package. ;) r � vMLY 5. The use of water conservation' techniques #Rfepmat3en deeumegts "is encou�i'aged, 7o further this end, each development shall�provide an information pamphlet, approved �y the City Planner to. each prospect;=re hoses: buyer. ,a 6. Additional trees m4y,be required to supplement.the required stieel suses-,al.ong—mijor_ .arteriails; secondary-, or collector streets;, as determined necessary,,by they City Planner or Planning Commission, in order to enhance the natural character of the area, and create a'norg rural appearance. 7'. Common open areas ,and front and. side yards: adjacent to a street, shall be adequately�,lindscuped,and irrigated. A fifinirtsim of 30% of the plant materials -,shall be large size (minimum 24"' box 'size trees, 10 gallon size shrubs) inr order to create a mature appearance. !r 8. Slopes- r,tth requfi►6d„ planting shall ,be ,planted with informal clusters of trees, and shrubs. to Soften end vary the slope plane. ARK Where slopes are 2:1 and five: feet or greater in peightY'�uin;netting shell be. used to help„stabilize planting and`od 'IrAize, soil erosion. 9'. Aative vegetation shalI,,be re'tailned and cup within canyons and along natural drainage courses. 10. The choice..of plant trerfials ndtF antfing techniq�aes"shall 4 take into account pvevailing soasth sterly Winds, as Well as Vie- seasonal winds or Santa Anal which.ge�eri-1 t4nd to_bloW:::out.® ;th¢ no!�'t*►seast= . G. Grading 1. Grading shall be phased so that ,prompt revegetation or construction will control erosion: Where passible, only those areas Which will be built on, resurfaced, or landsca�)ed shall sh®v;d.be disturbed. rop soil shall be stockpiled during rough grading and used on cut and fill slopes. ` Y —S-7 3 y T t f Grading operati s�,shall be pianne to avoid the ra"1hSr season;. October 15 .to April_ 15. Graditng permits shalt _only be issued when:a Cj plan for erosion control, and snit retention ,has beta"aprrgved by the eftY Pianner and 8uiid ,tag-Off iciaii ,;o,4 rs3egard to time of yearq 3 No excavatfoft or atn`jw,earth'disturbance shj�j1 be permitted, on WW hilisideY'great Print to_.the_ s�slaanc el, wadi OVUM' ww'O 3 exception o¢ 'drill hoBt<s and 0*' l Oratory trehofPe iar' e call ectio�s of ' geato� c ana9, ssa 1 date. Ihese treft iW are to be,proporly,bactfii a and,`i 0 w- vTabsent`prvdd j*greslopes; exc addition, erosion t " 4<, To, encourage maintenance' of slopes for erosion corttrot "arid ' aesthetics, property lines, wall,be located`two ( ) 'fee, ba3cic:fratC as the top; of slope. L TJ ensOtrago malntpftq of,4 i for orw1 m contiaaFd i*10etlo4i 1 . Property Qj%% aha9 boL tocata4,st tht+'tcsP.,aP the s4a{ae aebd eovdeegotr t€ t I� w reaeast im tnatagad by the develo#�er. Ai ty' oa MUO tre 2' Prose tots of:togs,taev_et sqt the tosr „ E �t, �h tL nY� v ef' }•`j "�. No potat vrtVgny structure subject to t he''"provisions- of this . . Section shall be ploser to_a visually prominent.rldgeline ''tharOOne.�hun4red and fifty (154) feet ►moaxured horizontally on k topographic map or Fifty (¢o)`f o' measured verticat,'�yca a cross section, whichever is more restrictive. S. 'Lot padding is limited to the .boundarles df the structure's ;founciariorr and a s�sab7 a;rear.yard.:area it i enc al_..aitiyj o ;i5 felt adjacent to and between the structure and top or toe of slope. if it is physically unfeasible +. j design a reasonable usable yard arse due'to conflict,with other" grads„g sFtandards, thenrother forms of usable open'Space should be considered sudh as,. decks, patios, balconies, or iother similar fours of built Structures designed to fit the natural :toponraphy. . Z 7. No finished slopes greater than f itilpercent {56 or 2:1? 'may be.crea, ed except beneath the encvosed ehvelape off structure" where the maximum created slope is limfted to;67 percent (1- J2:1Y'or less: Vr Jiopes trthin City �aisdfiained �8Fid3;S�p Ea,".ei�'�kt5 SF4a17 not i exceed a saxinum grade of thfriy percent (33.3 ar 3s1). 2 9. fill .shall not exceed a d4pth of five (5)`feet a any point except where the Planofng Commission di�°;ermines that unusual�'06pography, soil condi bans prerrious-grading, "or dthe�TM unusua'i circumstances indipate that - .. such grading would be'reasonable and necessary. k 111.. Retainir?q �raiis are limited to a. One, upslope (from the Itructure) l►ot to exceed four' (4) feet irk- height.1, 'Otherwise,. terraced retaining s4.fttures wall-4 shall ;be. utilized which''.are Separated by a Joiftimuljr,of threo;1`3) feet acid appropriate landscaping. . 74 �. d _ THIS :1 NOT THIS ts max a+ b. One dawnsl ap'e from'the structure not to exceed three and one-half (3-1l2) feel` iit height. ,where an a0eiitional3,re+ta tied portion is necessari <Ne to anu5ual or ext i.cosfditions,: iSush aS lot.configuration, steep slope or road designs then the vsa. of terraced retaining shall be considered art an individual lot ba terraced i4lis 94ta at exceed three (3) feet in height and shall' t* sepa�°ated b�► a,wAninp, ,f lie e` (3).. feet and, appropriate -iandscaping. Terrari'do is not Ato he uis`,d as a typical.soi.ution Within a 'do<feiopaeret. c. CR- lots '.sloping` with the streets and other configurations not dis6ussed, above�onerefaining: 1 rjot to-_e mod ;,hre� . and one=hal f (1-1/2)`feed its hPight;may be used in a side yard ivhere necessary (also see roadway). d. Malls which: _:.Integral pa't of the structure may exceed eight (8) "feet in height; hriwe4r, their visual inspect<-4sha11 be mitigated through contour grading a"od landscape techniques. 11. Ne Cut or''fill :slope'/shall not exceed eight (81 feet fin height at perimeters of the site or elsewhere raithout the: use of wal)s, terracing and other Mitigating measures, such as,contour grading, landscape �®;,„. } J Y.i Jf buffering, and then only as approvru'by the `r'tanning Cammi�sion after conclusive demonstration that, such cut or fill heights will no�,,'adversely affect adjacent properties, views, landforms or other. ,,,tsgnificant considerations not specifically discussed here and that they are, absolutely required to accomplish land development under extreme or;',unuSual circuostances and conditions. - I®r No sxepes steelvps thaR these exist" may be sPeated onsept as ppev#ded �R Sest#eA 17r24rg79rG 6 H. Drainage 1. Debris basins and energy dissipating devices shad be Gn- s4te eatsk §asst, : or s0tas4eR bas#ass is weT� as enersy ab§®rb$Rq dev4sesY mast be provided where necessary to reduce to ppeven% erosion wt'en grading is undertaken in the hillsiae areas. Natural drainage courses s W it be protected from grading activity. In instances where cr€;ssing is required, a natural . crossing and bank protection shall shewl•d,be preferred over steel and concrete systems.. Where brow ditches are;reguired; they shall be naturalized with plant materials and native rocks. 2. Building and grading perasits ,shall not be 'issuer' for construction on any site withqut an approved location for disposal of roan-off waters, including, but nod limited,,to such facilities as a dralnadi;� el„ public street or alley, or private drainag2` ease ntf which are not adequately protected from off-site drainage. . 3. The use of cross lot drainage shall be minimized. In situations where this is not possible using .conventional design, 'optional techniques including, j`,It not limited to single loaded streets and reduced densities shall be considered. Extensive use 'of, Toss lot deainage `shail be subject to Planning Comission review ard mau be considered after demonstration that this method will; not adversely affect the proposed lots or adjacent properties, and that it is absolutely required in order, to,,minimize the amount of grading which would result with conventional drainage p„actices. ri c� ;-! apply: _4. aPPI Wher E cross lot drainage i S utilize. d,lot if I : the followf g shall 9Ptter, an easement is protect interior 'Which has Provided which snail a natura7i °e� ►Tn one Tot mar( wa17 'a mtn tm zed a a n #n ei trrer.at d't jn achass o sham be PPear nce im r ne, other Public coast or,within A oved street ructed.l2 inches in di a closed oAen V Swale dra3nWe Is c � 't0 a Steep 11afs drama die close'inn �o drainage by a homeo onvoed to a a M#A1ym ;8_, 9e, shall be jc caseS, 2n in PiPe P�'+1 Mmers Assoc Private ea use# PP�vat ,i onvel,,ed�to tegral to t fon s #, f a d'a inage a eT er a a 1494i " su i otherwse ase eg shaTT A gm �scsp to a the dr�alha wkTeb• is ve be ant' zF TndfntduaT fee# #n width Public r4iteyn ea ge shall be fiaintained 3-k .r arpr� sha1; be l}Ye ease Pase `or tlhail cQnVeYd to a access dui s o w #eb ts. Pfth endent on 8PP►m sha T fl i efe is to h. P "a hYdl MTPed on an a9Tc staa and !I con ftv` .dv �lE P ;iiv o i to be+( n"s EC� R +. as cr" Ee py' Y a n#E!r woe► Poo E 11 ftm :f ,I r '! fl I! f C` nUAI& �OR IM& -A & Ift soft IAML Aft, ulaTtl arm .1 JI t � 4r r ♦' R �J 4 f r. . .1 r '1 r � � `y` �.. 1 4, litters.'cross lot drainage is utilize d, the i al1 owjlng,shall X apply: ,a Project inieriors One lot may drain,�'crass 6pe other lot if an easement is provided writflin #n #r; either an improved, open, V-sweCe gutter, which has a naturalized appearance, or within a cloOd drainage pipe which shall be is a mi4 1m 12 inches in diameter. In bath cases, an,integra ' wall, shall be constructed. This drainage shall be conryyed io either d public street or to'eithele a .*4*Jawm Is-feat prtyate dra9nagd etrsemerit.' If drainage is conveyed to a private easemefit, it stall 'wg4eli.#s to be`maintained by a homeowners association,,,,ethen�ise the drainage shall be conveyed to-4 public easement such as or to a public alley„ ®a.pas, or trail wrh#cla,is to be a mt0m m 23 feet, iP a#sthr The easement width shall be detemintA on an ind'vidual basis and shall be dependent on *ropriate hydralogic studies and access require nts, { I , Both was 1HW dr d®viea to lb'Q i.1 constrated with lira sL*4%vi>�on area!not' ]�1 left for insovkW homaown**,to co�tyilata. wid1-,is tiStef fined by 1I, ` 7. at1�`_ adaft0a or � � `isotSt wrtlh Alm ts, n 341 rsi*`Y � y Prefect boundaries 06 'site dra#nage s4a11 bq conveyed u } in an improved .open V-swale putk\erl which, ha' a 'natural.iae6 appearance,, orb within an undergrou�d pipe in either A mtnkV �-�e®5 private ,dwainage u, easement, which is to,,be maintained 'by a fiomeowner°s assactatian, or it' all be conveyed in a public earsement such as a ep �R a public alley, ea paseo or ^`twa11 "whkh ss is be a p� a$ nay eef w+_flap 7Fie easement t��dth 'shall lie determined on ,an individual' basis„'and shall ;be dep,,,ndeat om, appropriate � hydrologj.t: studies acid access regOfirements. rJ J� y` 61 F i� < �2 - f t} ti r Rhasq 11' a �, 18acA a natwim ;P"aPSgg6® ti i i 4!3 peiv�nta s3eian _ r 7 Pa ldisaf/ ae tcz Air. �. I` 9 I 0 ti f Sr 3` ESGGMGAtWdih d yA W WI UV2 W3 J � z. W1 -;pa r Od for mint-imme a ac�eba (12'rr n; 46P*Width 9 , I. Public Safety - The following Public Safety concerns should be- -addressed: Require adequate water.supply and pressure for 'alt proposed, dev(' +). accordant€ with Foothill Division Standards, Z. A permanent fuel modification area may be re4uired aroufid development projects or, portions thereof that are adjacent or-exposed 'ta hazardous fire areas for thez purpose of'f ire- protection,, 'ihe recommended width of the fuel modification area shill .,be based on applicable building and fire codes od a Fire Hazard Analysis Study developed by the-Fire 61vision. The width of the fuel tiibdificatign area 'shall be ,Ode rmined based upon: a. The natural ungraded .slope of the ti and within` the ` projeet.and InAhe areas adjageat ;te-the project', r> , m o r� .f r^ i - , b F'del loading; , c. Access to ttr�wproect an aces Ali' to ^the fuel �.� modified area; and =} d, t The°on si�:� ajkva�llabrol fi,��*of Water't�at jan be used for fire fightIng purpo'se5�. =1 "3: Adequate .provisions, shall' be made for the :ccrttinul^~ A'. maintenance of: such areas, an¢, where feasible, `such areas,r sh3'l` be ,d2signa.2d as common open;_space rather than .pritvae op,dn space. 4. Fuel modificatibn areas shalt also incdrpgra, e 'soil,' erostan . and sediment:co„-�01 measures to a3leviae permanent scarringnd 'acceler ted a I' erosion', O I I' t I i l Fk L r4 - 1pr 3 5. The Chief may require'brush,-vegetation or, debris to be reo' ved, and cleared within ten feet on each side of every roadway and access_ t, drive,° aid " may enters upon1. private propertyto do sa. This section shall not, apply to single secimers of trees,- ornamental. 3hru66ery or cultivated; ground cover such as-grega� grass, 'ivy, succulents=:o,j similai> plants lased as' ground covers, provided thej'. do not form a means of readily transmitting fire, At used in this section t; ."roadway" means._that portion of a hIghs ay or private Street improved or ordinoily used for vehi'culfir travel.. 6. If the Chief determines in any specific case that. difficult terrain', danger of <vrosion or 'other unusual .circumstainces make strict compliance with the clearance of vegetation•undesirabl.c or imIricti`cal 'he may . suspend enforcement thereof and ' require reasonable °alternative measures designed to advance ,�d purposes of his article. %. In the event the abatement, is not performed Aa required to Subsectie'a 'S. of this section, the executive Body,,may i st^uct the'Chief to giva notice to the os+ner of the ro er ` 'p p ay upon which sal:'' Gondttion exists to correct such prohibited' condition ,and, if the owRa;r fails to correct such ., condition, the Executive Body ,may cause,`the same to be done 'and make the expense of such correction a lien ,on the,,Property upon which such conditions exist. 8, Restri�-t struU ures and facilities from geologically hazardous areas. Y4 g. Require speaiul construction featui)�e in the design of structures Were site investigations, confirm potential gLologic;hazal^ds. 10. The friant Escondido and. RamonatArlington'.,so l associations are not _uitable for on-ri.te wastewzter dss osal Aevelo R pment not on public } sewers within areas generally defined as 'being ett}ier 'of these associations shall ee permitted,only after site specificinyestigations have beets conduetod that demonstro* the Soils are suitable and the"disposal of'wastewster ill riot degrade the'subsurface water quality. _r c ` c 11., The TuJunga-Celhi soft association.may have s �1 bearing t �� )pabilities that coaid limit some 'development. St-mtures proposed .pn this soil type should be permitted only after.,a site. spe6ific inuesiigation has b'�en performed that ind{cdtes the soil,- can adequately-support 'the wefght of tt scructury.' w - ry 12 For 'A I development iiithin uthe �.lquist-Pr1�p or &i*- ,-�., adopted "Special ��u;.; Zone"., a=sta-ant shall be included on ,e�ery��dee4''for each lot or .parcel wr14 infarms the prospect1ye owne,,:bf the paten"tia'1 fo.rr.• ` seismic activity and the p al hazard, C µr section 17.24.680 Density, d, Slope density regulati6n5,3which' correlate i_rtteps of developmen , steepness of'terrain trill':be used to minimize gradf;ng, removal-of vegetatign Or land,land. instability and fire hazards., Ther total allawabie' residential; dwe1llhg -r units shall 6e calculated`based oo the total Cbui. dale)land areal within:eaeh' slope.category and *ltipli� 'by_the:capacity factor pupsb�an4 for each to`the slope category A. Calculation ofdensity - The maximum number of units that may*be permitted in a proposed opmeft 'shall be determined by'.multiplyiag= that,, area of land.in each `°slope category, by tfle "capaci,ty,, fattoz,` 'shone ,i.n �fie following tables taking ;the. products a$ 'these calcula�ift s..conVerted to square feet, and MVIdYng' this�rfiga a by,the regfired site area_unit__in square felt prescribed in the underlying zon.fng cls:ejct (except the Hillside"ReScenfiial Districti'where' there is no minimum lot size requtred N In the ;Hillside Residential Dist rici;, the a1loable, amcurrt .of, bu�ldabl'e "area resulting 'frog the Capacity' actor calculation dill constitute the adjusted fret 'izui1: ab1e area. , z B. Cana Capability Schedule C,rBLI S dabieIYArea Ca�,jacity ` Ad3. Net s;f'dable Slope Category ire square r-eet Area N aare feet},,, Under 1'0 percent {'x X 2 00 10-14.9 percent, 15-19.9 percent $, 3C 050 20-24.9 percent i 25-29.9 percent X .025 s r 30+ percent r„ X 00 Divided Permitted by minimum' numi�_r of lot size units. requirement of,under-'., lying zoning dis.rict_ex. cept in Hill-- s:ide Residential, *Buildable area is; a con. quous`area of t3ie lot ehi.ch i,s less than in. natural` slope;' or,-. In the, . area 'adterndpd. ,� through environmental mental buildable. h C. 'E- xceptians Tne following land areas meeting as or all of the ; foilbwing criteria shall 96t be included in the calcplatian.4f'"total..ailowab`d, dwelling units: 2. Alt iarQ r�r�:s wegardless .of. siope.� t sici►. ilt:be ub ect ;to inundation during a itlQ j , storm after development'has ocEurred. p 2. all land ich is in a geotagicThazard zone as14defined in. ` the safety ele ent of the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and for w;+i,ch no feasible mitigatioA measures are proposetl. 3. Al1' land L area waich�lies within, a.Federal',,recogn led blue f� line stream, or contains significant riparian, pr strealit bed environs. ett Section Ir:2a, o Trani t of DueTTirg1 unit Allocations.. A. Purpose - Tie0 urpose of "transfer of dwelling unit allocations" As to provide; a procedure whereby the, potential ;developmoot of ad, area which star'I, to suffer adverse epuirI ental , impacts can be credited and then transferred to another more appropriate area;j in order, to preserve 'ihe character and, idantity of the former area. B. Definitions DONOR PARCEL - Parcel frs?i which developme?t .credits ` are transferred. y RECEIVER PARCEL - Parcel which development credits are. transferred. �. DEVELOPER' CREDIT - A.. development, credit is a p6terti81 entitlement to constrlact edwlingina tustsr area which can c only be exercised when the development credit haven transferred pursuant to the provisions of this section,,<frm a donor�io a receiver garcei 'and other requirements of law are, fuifilled. r. The allocation of dwelling units may be transferredi from one parcel (donor) to another parcel '(receiver's Within a project site, or, from a project site (Aonor` to adjacent ;p;ropertfes (recejveI, if coedit#ors are applicable_, when_ the d®v_ -jopment. i�-=the.s;3bje 4 i e.1 Wou,d cause' adverse impacts. The development per donor, ,site/parcel shall be calc.talated according to the "Calculation "of Density" liable and the result transferred, to: a predeter.ined receiver site/parce1._ The transfer of development credits is subject to a Developtoent Agreement (DA) and/or any other appropriate legal agreement, as Wil 'as,'a Speciffic Plan, and General 'Plan Amendment (GPA). The appl#cation., shall designate both the ;donor and receiver' parc ]s as 'part of the subject " property. The Development, Agreement, or any other appropriate agreement, 'a r shall be used tj ensures the-"appropriate legal idirection ford conpletl'n of specific eonditi"ons ind'encourages puolic and pria�atepartnership ,SpeciiG�, r., . Plan and General Plan ,4men49ent shall be used to determine the-.compatibility , Of the proposed land ruse to.surroun,d!64 land usq`,'-�esigpotions•, the appropriate distribution of .lat7d, ,uses . within '�n� ' L � plan �fioundaries. "arid allay " the designation of the donor parcel' as open "space, exgausting Jiffs development credits.- Tn addi"tiono" a Specific Plan' requires.,"Large scale rt+aster.planning and discourages increme'ntal,:pfeceneal 49elopment ,, } �1"ne transfer of devel$Pme if credits may Abe� ' thoriged..whe,, the Plenninr,#' Commission finds th at the"-receiver Rarcelb hasr' sufficient=area to f accommahate development p erwise permitted under'Gity. evel4pment Districts; plus the development credits to be iranserred, and' that such total development meets aii of. the applicable requirements of the 'C1ty'3 2et3el. 1 Olan and all provisions of this section. 'J C. Provisions L When deu alo i , nent` credits �^e transferred,`aTl such credits. � are thereafter' depleted with regard, to the`oonor parcel, Excess development creditrlof that donor'parciel which'.ere not initially transforred to a receiver parcel may be subsequently traFlsferred io another, .'receiver parcel In 4ccordance with the provisions of this sec on., 2. The, number of development credits which may be transfer d`__.___ shall hat exceed the' nuae bi ? 'ing lints"deterred for the donor parcel through established siope_.density.standards "and through•preliminary site .,,review to determine the actual ,nust6or of-units ,which could 6t: developed on the donor parcel su�r3ect tor provisions containee1within this. section. '.f y a ,J 3.. A00rd.4al `af development credits transfer most be based pn; findings that this'prgcedure is�.tonsistent with 'the General Plan and provide, for the long=tear, maintenance of the property as e open space.. Analysis of thy; eventual maintenance aaf, the open:. spase. $Stall ''be based upon tha City°s r. estImatedl angpai host for .maintenance and liahiCity for the .land and fq ' provisions thereof, 4. °71 •donor 'Parcel after development credits have been depleted, shall be ke e + y in a natural condition. However,• the City - may, pursuant to �C..an � anal Ose piP1ltmit authoril'ze the folloing uses if it deems they are cpat3�1aucifii taming the natural condition bf the l J. pr pertj3 and are coissis�ier� with;, C neol elan: f a. jVdii s ed b. c fruits. c.;�L�s1�i�(tensity recr��tion. , d, m r uses , >) e._ cess , rQcessary`to support the uses above.,.,ses i S. Land from,-,which develoD4ent credits- have been' Iran t o ; shall be,recorded at'.open space-through,the process of;a Specific Plan and a General Plan Amendment to ensur( that such land remains as open, space in perpetuity. l 6. A parcel. fi which deaelo�Uent credits have been transferred sh.11 not be'considered as'"comon open space" un'Iuss such parcel is transferred in fee to.the receiver T. Thy+ Uaaximum number,ofr6v!ela.ing units petted on a parcel receiving development credits• shah noff exceed the sub tova'f determined >sy applying the establisHed slope- density//standard.to the ►^ ry ng parcel and adding the number of development crerits'tras__ as outtined 1n Section 17.24.090.C.2. K o. may, • 'a ;,. RESOLUTION N0. �j A RESOLUTION 0 CNE.PLANNING, COMISSION OF THE CITY OF t' RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOK4ENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 89-03B, :REQUESTING TO MEND THE SECTION IV,: ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES AND' SECTI04 V, PUQLIC SAFETY ELEMENTS OF' THE GENEFW..�PLAN AS THEY, RELATE TO HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT AND GR<MINO', REVISING THE DEFINITION -0--HILLSIDE TO INCLUDE SLORES_B .PERCENT OR GREATER AS WELL AS RESTRICTING DEVELOPMENT ON SLOPES; 30'PERCENT OR GREATER, AND MAKING-FINDINGS` IN SUPPORT'THEREOF A. Recitals a ' (i) 1he City .,of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an =application for Genera) Plan Amel�dment No. 89-;O3R :.as described is,' the title of this Resolution. Heri;Ziafter in this Resolution,' the ,subject cleneral Plan 'Amendment is referrQ to as "the application". a (ii) D'l December 13, 1Q89� the Planning Commission of the City pf Rancho Cucam+nga e,ndu ted -a duly noticed public hearing on the.applicw'tion.;" (iit3 ll legal prere4uisites to ,she adoption of this Resolution � have occurred, i B. Resolution. I NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and rgjoived by the Planning Commission of the'City of Rancho:Cucamonga as-follows; '~ 1. ` This Comnission hereby specifically finds,that all of the facts set forth in Recitals,, Part "A", of 'this Resolution are true and correct. 2, Based uuoniubstanti3J' evidence, presented to this C61imission during; the above-referenced public 'trearing on' December 13, 1989,,including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony,, ,this - Ccraission hereby speciftcally�"finds as fotlomps:' (a) The proposed amendment will not have a.significant imp;►ct on the environment as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the In*lal -`Study, Part ir; and (b) The proposed aamendment, will promote and further implement the'.goals and objectives of ,the, General Plan by, protecting the natur,aO charkcter of, the foothills, by limiting the potential alteration to the natural landform, and by ensuring the safety, health and ell being of the cmud.hity through restriction of development' from .areas with potentially unsafe environmental conditions including soil erosion,. landslide, seismJC. flood, fire, pollution, as well as limited public service access; and PLANNING cownsiON RESOLUTI1ON N0. GRA 89-038 December 13, 1989 { Page 2 (c) The reposed ;amendments sha11 preserverthe scenic character and minimize potentiab negatiVe-,ttesthetic impacts as are?uTt'of.conventional grading in the,norii,ern areAs' !tf the City by. revising the defl-nition of hillside from 10 percent to land with with a natural slope of 8 percent or greater; and (d) The amendment e4=urages the protection of ,Iatural areas for ecological, education end hthir, scientific ptrpds� by, restricting development from sensitive OJ"Iside Areas and by encouraging�a more sensitive' treatment to the land in th�n�ether City City and sphere areas;40, (e}' lhe= amenda `nt;,.xr7i ;preserve the fooi7i's at grades. 30 ty percent or greater' as a natu'od1 resoarce and will pr e open space land uses by restricting development"from significant features of Ian d such as rock outcroppings, ridgelines, sensitive wildlife habitats, creekside or riparian woodlands, and view corm ors; and --J` 31.11 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the-_specific findings of facts set firth-in paragraphs 1 and Z above, thisf,Coinsiission hereby finds and concludes is follows. -��. (a) That-the proposed amendments would not have significant AdML impacts on the environment nor the-surrounding properties.,44 i (b} That the proposed a �dments are in conformance with the General Plan 4. This Commission hereby finds than the project has beep-reviewed and considered, in compliance with,the Cat ifornia,Environmental Qual4ty Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby` recommends issuance of a Megat ve Declaration. 4r, ' 5` ''Eased upon the-findings-ond-conclusions se.4-forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, an'a above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuantrto ,Section 0 65850 to 55855 of the Califarnia 'Government Code, that the Planning-Za►m►ission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval or;the 13th day of December, 1989, of Genera's Plan 1Mendmer1f$No. 89-03B, 6. The Secretary to this CamAissian sha11 certify to °trie ardoptian of this Resolution. r i i „ t. ` o r,�ANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. GPA 89-038 I ti OEcember 13., 'i989'' Page 3 ' AP.PROVEC ANK ADOPTEM'THIS 13TH DAY OF D CEMBER, I989. PLANNING COMMIS$10N OF THE CITY 'OF RANCHO CllCAMONGA V ATTEST: Brad a er, acre ary Ir I, Brad Suiler, Secretary, of the {Manning Coast?ssid of the City ofji Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing_lreso7ution was duly 0hd regularly introduced, passed,,, and adopted by the Pl�nning Commission, of th!: City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commissii,it h6''Id on the 13th,day of Deci4er, 1989,,by the following y to-t-wit: AYES., COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMISSIONERS: { ABSENT, COWISSIONERS: 1! �i rC i. 1 f �i ilk RESOLUTIOM NO. 41� A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF' (` RANCHO CUCAMONGAS CALIFORNIA, RECOMhiENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 8902, REQUESTING,T AMEND TITLE 17 OF THE MUNICIPAL"CODE BY ADDING CHAPTER'17.24, SECTIONS 17.24,010 THROUGH 17.24.090,, 17.06.01O.C.l.g AND " 17.06.020.C.6; AMENDING SUBSECTIONS 1746,010E 5, �! 17,08.040.B AND. 17.18.0301A, 17,18.040.E 5.a, AND 17,'i.O40.E.5,b; AND DELETING SUBSECTIONS r 17..06.010.E.5;a THROUGH f, 17.18.040.A 1.a THROUGH e' AND 1.18.040.E.5,a.i., THROUGH iv., REGARDING EST'A!5LISHMENT OF GUIDELINES AND' STANDAR►IS.FOR HILLSIDE DEVELOPAEAT� AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. " (i) The City ce Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application[ for Development Code Amendment No. 89-02 as, described in the title of �tNns Resolution. Hereinafter 4in this Resolkton, the subject 'Development,�gde Amendment is referred to as, °the applicat,on". 1 (ii)' On Dewnber. 13, 1989,,.the Planning Commission of the.i.ity of Rancho Cucamonga conducted,�a duly noticed public hearing on the apolication_ and issued Resolution No. recommending to the,, ty Count='r' that the associated General Plan Amen�,i �C 43B be approved. (iii) All legal- prerequisites to the adoption of this ,�Jesolution have occurred. B. Resolution,, NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby foltnd ' determined and resolved by the Manning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows, 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that ,all, of,the facts set forth in Recitals, Part "A", of this Resolution 41re tv.146,and correct. 2.1 Based upon substa4tial evidence presented. to this Commission during the -hove-referenced:public hearing on December. 13, 1989, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The proposed arwandments.wil1 not have a significant, impact on the',"environment as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Study; Part II; and J, II 1 PLANNING COUSSION 9ESDLOTION. N0. DC A 8942 December 13,';1989 Page 2 (b) The proposed amendments will Promote and further implement the goals and bdectives of the General Flan by protecting the natural character of the foothills, by 'limiting the potential alteration to the natural landform, and by ensuring the =safety, haaa.tt. .and well-being of thecomnunity through restriction of development fri _,aas vdth potentially unsafe environmental conditions including soil erosion, landslide, 'seismfc, -� flood,. Piro:,,pollu.tiln,. as well, as: limited.public service access, (c) The proposed amendments shall preserve the scenic character and minimize potential negative aesthetic impacts as a result of conventional grading in the northern areas of the "City 0' revising the definitioa of hillside from 10 percent to incl.ude..land'with. a natural` slope of 8 percent or greater; and ? t (d) The amendments encourage the protection of !%tural areas for ecological, education and other" scientific: parpose;s A-,, restricting development from sensitive hillside areas mill by encouraging ;a;ilore. sensitive treatment to the land in the northern City and sphere areas;, and (e) The amendments wily) preserve the foothills at grades 30 percent or sreater as a natural res 'ce and will promote open spade land uses by restricting development from significant ,fcatur?� 'of land such as rock outcroppings, ridgel nes, sensitive wildlife habitats, creekside or riparian woodi`ands, and via-► corridors, and AOL ' (f) The amendments will avoid residential densities which exceed the capacity of the land end level of services Aichr can be reasonably supplied by limiting the intensity of development in hillside areas through application of the slope/capacity farmula and (g) '*e. amendments ; will encourage innovative and sensitive !, development In the hillside areas through the provision of guidifOnes and standards . which address site design; driveway. roadway design, architecture, walls and fences, landscapiig, grading and drainage;, and IN The amendments shall limit the potential negative 40-pacts on adiacent developed and undeveloped properti4s as the result of additional requirements;for hillside areas, and (i) The proposed meendments will result in -minimal impact to envi.,ro",mentally sensitive areas ,through the use of transfer of development credits to aroas which%ate fees sensitive. 3. $ase4 upon the substantial evidence presented tw this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing-and 'upon the specific findings of facts set fortis In paragraphs 1 and,2` above; this Cormnfssion hereuy finds and concludes as follows. x ,Y"� PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO." D9A 89-02 (.. December 13,;1989 Page 3 ` (a) That ,the proposed amen,ment .is corApatible with the uses permitted in t��, taffected. districts OL, teiMS L of access, size, and compatibility wit.: existing land use. in the surrounding area, and _ (b)r_,. That_the :proposed=arend�;,2t �i3f riot have significant _. ' impacts ors th1e environment nor the surrounding properties; and (c) That~ the proposed�ti' indment is _in confoiinarece with the General Plan. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the prn3ecV has been ri0ewed and considered in coiApliance Wth'the talifarri; nviran ental Q.�alit7 Apt'of 197d and, •Farther, this-CommissioR?,Ifiereby recar, ends 'issuance. of a, Negative Declaration. - 5. Based upon the'J'find ngs and cohdktsi* set forth in para i, 2, 3, and �4 above, this_'Comaission her:;eby resol���s ths�ypursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Concernment Cdc , thattlr�e ri~n�ding Gommis's3ori of the City of Rancha Cucann' a hereby recorare►ids appr`„„oval on the 13th day of .` December, 1989, of Development Code lAmendi,ent 89-02 amendin4 Tftle '17 of the Municipal Code as follows: SECTION 1: The following subsections of'the Development Code of the City gf r anc o ucamonga shall be amended,to read, ip words arid: l°igures, as-follows: a) 17.O6.OIOt.5J 4 5. Grading Committee: - The Grading'Committee,-comprising of representatives oa each Div3sinn of the Community . Development Department WV.r consider items such as, but ::got limitp,d'to, cat and 'fill ,areas".,drainage and,flood control r ' facilities; erosion control; retaining :walls;. and the effect .of proposed grad on' adjacent "operties. This Committee Will determi,,d ii• the gradi_.r-plan meets,'City grading guidelines and policies. The deci5ian of.the P,ading Counittea will be forwarded to the City Planner .or Planning Commission and will be based on criteria contained in the City°s Hillside Development Ordinance,.;thaoter, 17.24. b) 17.08.0rO.B aid C$ footnote A: A, excluding necessary 'for secondary streets and c arterials and in zhillsi-de areas, shall be depeMent on,the ope >, j•.', sl /capacity factor containod in Section 17.24�.080.6. c) 17..08.040.8,. adding footnote K and 17 O?�040.C, adding faatnot� L, which shall state the Y61 Towing: u � c KAWING2COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO'. " December 13, ?1989 Page 4 " In hillside areas,:" heights_ shall be"Timited to 30 feet as specified "in Section 17.24.0710,R.1". -' it dl 17.08.050.E.5: 5. The project Site "isidesignated `by';the General" Plan as Hillside Residential, or;-Js a"hiliside condition. (defined" as havIng natural slopes. of=eight' (8) percgnt or'graatdi") and,e6�ironmeirtal studies "have been'conducted to determine land hol ftq capacl.V and site davelpbment constraints, and the proposed.d'ensity..i5 n� greeter zJ1an two, units per net bui•ldabla acre lo D. A preci` e site`Adevelopment plan`sa ing lot layout , access, street, design,;building locati,o�' ` building design, . anti `grajfQ0, _Wsi "be prepared in, •isc4dance ;with ' fie residential reViev p'roce4ures contained''in Chapters 17.06 and 17,08� .<in, conjunction. with any "subdivi lion 'or development 1praposal in`.• the ` Hillside,", Re identiai District. A1.1"<such proposals mus't,<.ca ly,with 'tire design guidelines"a standards and -;:jsoluCi policies" a= Chapters 17.08"and 17.24.". f) 17.18.030.A: A. Etinimum Parcel ,Size: No absolute minimum parcel widths and depths are required. BuiidabC) area is"considered to be A contigaous.zr*of the lot.which is less than, thirty (30)' peacent n natural sl"ope-zr the area deterained through the enviroamental, stndiesand investigation as;buildable and it r spbJect'to Slopa/capacity factor calcul'atIons contained;in Section 17.24.6696. 9) 17.18.030.t Building height: Shall be consistent with the heightpK')visions contained in Section 17.24-07.0.0.1. h) 17.18.040.A.1.a thrwgttt'es 1. Grading', of any site, shall conform to the standards cdntained in Section 17.24.050. i? 17.1P,.040.E.S.a.I through 4a i' Reteirring Vall's shall be tnnstruc$e in a ranr�� enns#scent 8 with the prov.Woos, cbnV,,_,pgC in TSeci:fioAs` f7.24,070.8, C, J and G. x l (t. PLANNING COFR'!IISSIOPI,RESilLtETION NO. DCA 89-02 December 13,: 19t3g. Page:`E CCyr J) ' 17.18.O40.E,5 b. Exposed weirs and" fences facing roadwau,s shall be no, greater than.,'5 feet in height, except as-;necessarY for, acoustical purposes to satisfy:the intent of the noisE ordinance. SECTION 2 Section 17.06.010.E.5.o through f, 17.18.040,R.1 a through e, an . 8.040.E.5.a.i through-iv of the Development'Code, shall be:, deleted. SECTION 3.; The Development Code, of the City of Rancho' Cucamonga shall be amenaee3—adding subsections 17.06.0104.T.g, 17.06.020.C,6 and Chapter 17,24, Sections 17.24.O,10 th-ough 17.24.090 to read, in words ,and figures, as follows: a) 17.06.017C.1.g g) Ali projects,within a hillside area (defined as having i, slopes eiglht (9) Oereent or greater are subject to review pursuant to Section 17.24.020.h. b) 17.06.020.C.6 Projects which mayrequire review per Section 1724.020.C. c) Hillsisu Development - Chapter 17.24, Sections 17.24.010 through 17.24090. 6. The Secretary tothis Commission shall certify' to the adoption of this Resolutions.. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DA Old DECENBER', 1989. PLANNING COMMISSION;Or THE, CITY OF GAF t BY: Lam T. WNiel ch al rman " ATTEST: arad Buller, Secretary - I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission:Of-the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby eartify ,that the foregoing:Resolution was 'dul�r.and regularly introduced, sassed,• and'adopted by the Planning CommissiQn� or" the City of Rancho Cilcamo,.,.,,"-'-t a regular meeting .of the Planning Comnissi.9n held 'on f,,)e 13th,day, of 6ocember 1989,E by the,fol l owing vote-to-refit: J PI,EWW�tTNG CQE411SS16F� F3ESQ;,t1TI0A1 P��, :�;' S '.KA 89-1Z e itecember 13; g9 t' Page 5 ` f" ff 0. 4' AYES: CQR418:" NERS: 4 YS NOES: CO4�+IISSIONERS5,- J ABSENT, COhS4ISSIONERS: o �4 4 ,t Zm L y ` � t ' ar _ n `S r 7 Ii �( Or � JAY DIIC`c � O�tLC1 1-7 S ,! J� M.,J.Brock&swr 1,Inc: r '�- Contraatots/r'�veto�*rs. �1, - t Sine.�cc i$f ,i Corona.�A9171� ""t (714)736-0711 Rzx(714)MW42 December 13, 1989 "r ' CITY OF RANCHO"CUCAMONGA" PLANNING COMMI,5SION 9320 Baseline goad Fancho Cucamonga, Ca. 9170i; �/ - tE+ _ Re: Proposed Hillside Dav=loprdent Ordinance `1 Dear Commissioner's: On November 27, 1989, weNreceived a copy of, the proposed. Hillside Development O'rdinan,e. We appreciate the eolicerns ishich }have;sled ta`tne'drafting :of .th:s document and on some poinrs:,agree'that ,the development cottttunity needs to receive more specific,in£ormaiion on.how eb impiemtht the development of their hillside project, Howry'rer, the proposed ordinance. contains 'mahy tequireml>Ot's= that will force the dev`elopment` 'of these pzo,jects;.`into. a monotonous, ;+ repetition of A;milarly designed houses. The strict': 'archiractura3 requirements within the proposed .pidinance will 'not-a1164 many of" the up'at;d ` doming'prestigious areas of the City to'be develo&ki in a highlj aesthetic aitl creative manner, which crdates,,-a desireable, cpmrtitniig'fcr` the type, of buyer that wants to live in`a ha'me'with a'custom type `design..-We world, like to .see the following items changed or elite- tad-fYom the proposed ordinance in order to allow more flexability in`the design of,Ehe typical hillside`iiev'e�opment:. {' l) Section 17.11.050 Hillside Designation: We feel that the, true hillside ' condition should be defined .as ,a site where- the average f slope,'_y of the i ' project exceeds 1D%. Also on`sites where`the ,overall slope is '1es that i it does not seem reasonable-:that existing,-Aandfohtts must ratan .their _ natural; character. 2) Section i7.11,060 Guidelines.: l a) The requirement that all, large oof lines mu ea must parallel . wF r?e. average.slope is muph` restrictive and does not elTow ? for varying architectural styles, and motifs. b) Not aftowing a second� floor of,a structure to cantilever ign2res the desirability of designing: structures that can take full advantage a£ a passive, solar energy e;ements tlf design into.account. `' tr i cl Wiih ieSpecC ta,buxlding materialS, 'by requiring all exterior �' materials to- be of.muted earth tone colors 411 Burley lead to 'monotenousx ' repetitive archite tutal designs thtoughoµt alL of the hillside development; In light Hof the `use of muted earth tdng colors t would: seem reasonable tFjat soi�d; n � exteria p imet�r" �ta'I a of earth Cone colors should' be i acceptable a5 opposed eliminating all solid-privacy' walls.' d) In all cases qua 'thinleit is far more, reasonable from'both s sa'feCy and maintetiancs point of `view Co seuarete the structural r:egii rements •for.roads'and"structures. ',�"�re�ctre ate wos 1d ro'cuest tki�t, the 'use ofintegr al struc£ue and toad retaining walls be eliminated' 1 h Section 17.11,070` Development Standatds's' a)' In..order to allow 'an architect `the ability to use varying roof :pitches to Lend??with different prchitectutal Ityle3 wo feel that, it .is-;teasonahle ta'raise°'the mauitrum build3rig height to 35,feet. b) The reguiremllntt"for„lot 'landscaping should scot he;part of the :;ordiri�nce: - If at all this' requirement: would bei"beCter lotated i4fth n"the,CCW5-of`a project.;; . c7 :In' to paradglat on-site restxic'tion :.of dirt„ x balancer In a cs4st:om Lot subdivisbon where lots Are ,go"ing to be marketed., it is'not reasonable Co.r'equixe that th6;grad%rtg' always be phased. 4 d) $egis Ling t open V-swale gutxers, .to be ."naturalized in appearance" will force unnecessary cost-to the' deweloper.S aid really increase suture maintenance-,co t,due...tte._dehL3 catching'asa nre ib tfie rough surface'of;such a structure Section 17, 1.08Ci Density 8 _ ' R ; jjtd=, ` a) It is our o,p14A that the'"capaci,,y"factor'! for density is too. restrictive and does not allots for a reasonable development of property.' I Even; on moderate, conditions ,='of under 14.9,percent the_cmtrent'standards do not allow for a reasonable development of one-half°'"acre- lots 4 thin a ro'ect. l I � l *. E'. Z would like to thank youfo yu� Czy respect,w to the proposed hillai'e oi&nance �P, ase £eeL� Ezee .to calV'iae to:"d�euss' this matter if` ' you deeiver = �Y Sincerely, -, en ?t. Sh pard Y SRS/We cGc Dave Valentino Jason Wheaton t„ t, r� 7 1' z„ +L rl7Yt�t�P,91t�t��i3�!@�4d�G�� 01`ANINING Wc,VOR -.',ecember 8, 1989t Mr. Chairman and Members` of tlr,e 1,10PAIII �INA�l Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission P.A. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 `+ '{ RE. Proposeii`Hills de Development Regulations set forth as Chapter 17.11 of the Rancho Cucamonga 'Dev elopment I'ode and dated i 11/27/89. Dear Mr. Chairman and commissioners, Thank you and the , Tannin' staff for tha o " ortuntt-`to review Y P 5 PP } the City's proposed Hi14-4de Development Regulations. The f following comments; ara A1;,:8viC.'8d fi;- 'your review prilor to approval of the proposed ordinance. Both the commission and the staff should be commenced for the professional job which has gone into t1le formulation of these proposed standards 4 Ws greitdy appreciate the open attitude, public foruma`'anci numerous revisions which:havq:occurred over the original document. The process c--ational and:measured public planning has been well served`by your actions. our comments are limited to 'a narrow range.':of issues which, if . further addressed in the. proposed regulations; will result in a. set of standards providing for 'the widest range of potential)e.-,,pd ; use analyses. r� i We respectfully draw your attention to the`attac, r Page 13, 'of the draft regulations which set forth certain side zones as;;'' dictated by existing slope percentages. As developers of golf course communities we greatly appreciate the City providing :for consideration of alternative grading techniques which encourages, innovative solutions to special' topographi constraints-. _ fi We therefore proposes the :city explore the creation'of a Special J( Study Zone in areas ..f slopes betveen 8 and 'In This Special . Study Zone should amplify the subject of "alternative conventional grading techniques" and how "special design features, such as a golf courF,z1' might provide for a •number of innovative solutions. The further study of this subject would build on.the flexibility that is offered in the proposed' standards and allow far more efficient review of Proposed development in the 'Special Study 3�o,ne. Mike tterncy PMJett Direaof ! LANDWRK LEWD COMPANY OF CAUFORN A,.INC,110 N.Lincoln Am,Suite:100,Caton,C4lifomta 91?Rp, 714-272-W70L c Rancho Cucamonga Plakining'Commission ` Lecember 11, 1389- Page two We would alsa ask your consideration'of issues present.on Page 42 which has also been attached,for your convenience. The sectional illustration on this page could be'interpreted to dopict a ' situation where drainage flows would be cihsirained by materiala`= present:in the dY�:ttge path, This illustration shaald be evaluated by the City ]engineer. We feel -the narrative`provided' - for under section v..i on :the same page provides cl( ar direction on this subject. The interest of ciarity'iught also bP well served by revisions to the building envelope illustratibns on the attached copy, of Page 49. Maintaining the same goalc and 'incorpbriting the same standards. through different illustrations would serve the best interests of the proposed brdinance, Attached Page 57, provision No_rt references limits to rear yard areas- We respectfully gubm t tc tikes condniaz on that the",1 inclusion of :strict numeric limits, such as �2ie 15 frat set forth in this 'section, defeats .the purpose of the flexible and Innovative standards proposed by the City: We Tfft'u-feel that imposing such'limits could worX. against the Ci�'s desire to. create atn upscale community ineprg3rating,subdif =signs of larger, pr. equestrian size lots. our final comments are directed to the "Land Capability Schedul+a" provided on Page 65,, also attached. The. tablzs which facilitate the calculation of the 'capacity facror" place a'"linear ' r constraint upon regulations which otherwise; encourage fldxt.bility and innovation. We ask that the Comrnissiori and staff coacsidsr tho question wher6y the slope classificab on of SA is provided ;a factor of 1.=00, whoreas,a, slope: classification of ,,. % is assessed a 25% reduction in capacitiy, at, p.75, r 44, e7lty where -a -slope - increase of 1t or less i� dealt: a�2s ra_ductior, in f1 parity seem contrary to +he o'.herwise'measxred 'prov isions of t2ie proposed to wid l array,of`�oi , ionsrpr-esen in hillsidszareas anticipate the We feel the otherwise, excellent ptbv sions of the proposed Hillside Development Regulations are thrown into conflict with, these Ocapacity factors" --We also feel #.his section could potentially constrain tr of the .Commission tt analyze features and elements efiwcoverea& through further_ study of the wide variety of cbnditlons anticipated by these regulations; r, } f l }1, ^v t Rancho Cucamonga planning Commission December 11, '1989 Page three Thank you again for, your consideration of these comments. We ask j that. the Planning Commission examipe;the possibility of incorporating our comments into the proposed. ordinance prior to hezirings by the Rancho Q�icamonga City Council, Sincerely Mike Rtt'rney Projecbirector r Landmark Land Company of California, Inc, '� c +mot s�t j ii 4 ,. �r Dr,A FT, a Fo y t�tscus�;G+ [I=i.:�;����� ONLY 2 5 to 7,99_ Development with grading ",,is, 'P{ itted. in this zone but existing landfor'ms most retain their natural charact&r Padded buildinj sites are pe�pittrd'�h4rYever, techniques such aS` contour �raaing, combined ,Slopes,�lIiyite,d cut nd fthl, and• - spl(t level *nOttecturawrz', e , or prototypes,IDpadding . for the strqtures only, may ;be" requird to rednre ?grading. Considerat ahI of Alt +na>:'f6 conventional grading tec*1444 may, be ,allowed ;for, :a pro;ec within a master pEan-hfiich C� includes special design featuires, ° such golf course, dxtensiye open, scam, or significant use of green`f`el1,s or paseos'.. 3. 8 to: 14.9 Qif'6s is a hillside condiilion. Special hl1lside architectural and ��� desir4r 4chnique§ that, mini graOW1 a 1'e required in this vone,. Archit(ictujral prototypes are Pxpectiid to conform to the natural', landfol n-b,� usiog-techniques such;as `" Ol i t l ev0Fl" foundations of grea'ter than 1.1�fni:hes, stem walls, stacking and cliisterin = FOR DIIS I S:• ,.,s Mt�M tr rim �y�¢ t 1..:l Y.n�.. i '� Use of alternative convel'htional grading techniques may be considered for limited portions; of a 'Iroject within a master pi an which 7i�Glud4s special design features, suQi as .a golf course, extensive.open,s mce or, significant.use. of= greens—b2;ts<.n .___... `a paseos; i 4 15` to 29.9 Development Within, I'Ms ztl�ne Iim$ted. to, no more than the less visually prominent slopes, Gild then only where it cane be shd, that safety, environmental and ae!�thetic impacts can be minimized,,, Use of larger, lots, variabl;e se`i0cks and variable, building sfirJctural t.f techniques such a.;`,vstepped, or, pole foundations fir,, expected, Structures shalt bl`enc 4tith the natural environment th`od�h their shape, ; materials, and colors ,;. Impact of traffic and roadway; is to be minimized 'by following Natural contours, . or using grade - '5eparratons: ,,.,. ,✓ ' o 5 3Q and aver _,This is an excessive slope condition and development is prahibitedF ,q Examples of graA#eg 41 various 0epe eategerks ` r tag G. ora_inag4�1 t Where possibldrainage channels,should.:be pl"ced.fi� Tess visible locations, and more importiirtiy, Should..�ectieivQ a c�att aTizing treatment including native rock,,colored concrete and 13�Ydsccpinga that the structure appedrs a5 a��tegral part of the environment. tt� all cased AG or _. <._:: concrete i.inzarshala'be used in,additiun to a naturalizingf'�imant 1r THIS VY 1 Use of nature rocks trU''naturAGnO man-made' � r brow ditch ri { NOT THIS Ty*ikl brow d tcff = With A.C.or concrmg weer 31 +mot a _ . i, d "I1 b. AtillI oft �. R,,m i.Mom-height of 1? fee: a"t tine front setback extending up and:'tdir r�i the rear crf. 11 at s 4S degree ait�'fe to a;. . _:.. maximum height'of 30 'feet as ireasurtd feoR fi"tisbed.-grade; „A"mdxjaum fte$g'ht,,'- at the :side setbacks sha11- bu is Meet exttW%q up to a center of lot a"t .. a 4` degree..a: I7. heig� of 30„fedt as cured' fit-i ps s f _ grade. r m �tIt"t Elevation F �\ 77 t Foist ofaAkAng setbc4� I uphm sect tint Lr ' �.. Gross Sl e,�-lots & mai4&81m height of 3 feet`, as measured Eros finish dT�tsade9 at thr Elam sethaok extending toward F: a rear il of the Tot. The' ma citau�a. ,height at the side' setbacks shall.be AS Feet extending ,up to`the canter of the lot at a 45 degree angle to a max mum of 3te;. feet as measured frnm'fini.sh0 grades S€m}�'ap pees}Pefepts`as ':€ep aen}14 and oewahtl'l lets exeept-that hetg�t at €pest yapd FRAY be a4' €peRtage tns a!e the side Yard'se \1 - BUILDING ENVELOPE R-A CROSS LO f`SLG +E c� '48° 4 Q. Side set4dk "r l d. The above provisi.&.t are intended" to apply to the gain bulk a►;d overoll sass of the bt{ilding. Architectura$`4 errrictnts and vartations in roof,zassing are encouraged. 'projectfans above the;- height limits for,>architectt►,rai features way be considered subject to the`provisioris , contained in Serstion 17.04.050B.1.f z, A. - Calcw�lation.of densi��y s`1h2 maxi�um number=.of unity that may be; permitted in a'proposed devglopmFnt+ stall b rietennined by mul.tiplying,.tba't (f area .of Aand\yin mach"."sl' ,'category" by the "ca�agity factar" shGwn in the following table;, taking tl;e.produots of these calcutatipns ,tc�nrerted tcs square feet, and dividing this .figure-by-the, rO_quired site,area unit ;zn`square prescribed in:,tite underlying zoning;district,�except th'e Hf1'lside`P.esidentiat` District. wbere�` fi�;!re ��� pro minimum lot `size required, i in �re Hillside Residential .gistrict, :the a a1loHable amoo,nt of buildable_ar�a-.resulting from the Capacity Factor calculation: ,M constitute"the ad3usted"; netl'�sildable area..: J- 1�. i B." Viand Capability Sc uie - (*S01 041 e},Area Capacity k Adj.' Net Buii dabl e S1ope.,Category in square feet.. Factor ;, Area ,(;square .feet} Under'l0 }percent 77X 1.00 z 10-14.9 percent 15-19.9 percent It 0401 = 20424.9 percent 25-24.,9'percent X .025 v= 30Y percent X' . 0,0 Divided • Permitted`' by minimum number a,f i= lot=size units -regvtrereni. of under lying ,zoning district ex- c�p-t in_Hil - side Residential ' *Buildable area is a contiguous area of the lot which is lgss than 30% in natural slope, or it the area determined,, through` environmental studies acid investigation as buildable. 7�4' N 5 No.point o :any 'structure subject,to the provisions of this: Section shall,!be closer to a visual'1j prominent rid%gelige.than one hundred and` fifty (150) feet measured horizontally on a topographic map or fifty (50) Feet ` - treasured vertically on a.cross section, whichever is'morp restrictive. 6: Lot padding it limited 'to' the boundar..Yes of the structure's. foundation and a usable ream d area (resldeniial. only) of IS,-feet, adjacent r ' to and between the structure and' tiop or toe of slope. ' I€' it is physically' unfeasihle to design a! reasonable usable lard area�,due to conflict with other; l t grading standards, then other forms '; a able open space should be:gbnsiderQd _'!t such as: :decks, patios, balconies,,,dr, other similar,forms of tidilt str;ktures i. ' designed to, fit ihe-natural tbRog:raphy. 7. No finished slopes greater than 'fifty percent .(50r 2:1} i may be created except `beneath the enclose�,_ envelope of a structure' where the maximum created slope is 1-imited to 67 percent (1-1/2:11 or less. '�f 8. Slopes within City maintained landscape easements shall not exceed a maximum grade of thirty percent 03 3Z or3:l 9. , Fill shall not exceed a depth,,tuf-vive. (5) fleet at any point" except where the planning. Commission; determines that einusual topography, soil conditions, previous grading, or,, ot3ier, unusual circumstances; indicate that,, <. such grading would ba reasonable and necessary: IO Retainin`g wa11s are lisaited to a. One upsiope (from thf�,kstructurel not to exceed four (4) feet in 'height. Otherwise, terraced retaining structdres wad's shall P utilized which are separated by a minimum d tkree (3) feet and appropriate landscaping. r -, 14 r` 44 — .57- h j Original Poor Qua ity f1 arig"nal Poor j CS LQ S i k • R p.,u 72 t :. 4 3� --------- CI^kY OF RANCHO Ct1C1t,11I0NG�S:z STAFFREPOR a, DATE: Decerrb& 13,1989 r TO: Chaim an and_- 24,* rs of the Planning Commission ; 4 FROM:. Brad Buller, City P �nne� Vince Bertongr Ass istantf,Plq,,,1er SUBJECT °f ENVIR MENTAL ASSESSMENI Aid C09):11IONAL USE PERMIT 89-29 D D; P e ,reAyeSt o esta; , a b � in' a J eased -space'bf-2%700 sodare feet withi art existing j� building on :1.09 acres of land in the :Couiercial Office District, Subarea 3 of he Foothill 5ouleVarxt`5e,if ro Plan,_'" located at 9583 Faothill;v Boulr;vard APl4;_208=261-47. t,. I. PROJECT AND "SITE-DESCRIPTION . A. ',Action •Re'Uested; Approval o r a non-caistruction Ionditioszal use ermiis t uestaatsiish, a bar within.'an,existing mriti-tenant f . commercial center located on the south. side) of Foothill qw Bou9evard�ast of Archiba'1d Avenue. B. Surroundin 'Land'Use and Zoning: Nort Mn,.ty mrerc�a ooth'ill 8au:levard SpecIfit. 'Plan South - Low Residential Cast. - Special Commercial, Foothil'1 Boulevard Specific Flan test - _Community Cotimaercia1, Foothill Boulevard Speci€i'c Plan C. General Plan Designat� ions Ct G eci 1 .. l:ommerC to t North - camwrcial T South taw Residential East - Commercial West - Commercial D. Site Characteristics: The Dro,iect site is ;developed With an ex st tg . It,_ •tenant co al center, ITEPi F PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP.89;=2,9 DEWDROP INN Dece6l)y, 13� 196 P ag a 2, n E. Raking Calcuiations: `Wffber ;of N_� bdr of Type Square Parking Spaces r Sp aces c of-llse l, . Foatage.. Ratio Regu3red Provi&ed w Bar '� (praposed)' 2,70D 1/100 27 i. 2711 Gener&,Ll, Retail (existing) 7,260 1/2.50 29 29 Medical,`,(existing) 3,060 1/200 15 15 Restaur,.it (existing) 3,Q00 1I1QQ ;10 30 Office ( .xistin�) l ,3$Q 1/ZO 6 6 Office,/WiiT (vacant) 7,080 1/25-0 Excess paM,ing - OTAL 185 7-W " Applicable . ui(ations_ The Foothill Soule rd Specific pla7, requires bars within, e Commercial Office. D;i t�rict to obtafiti st a;Conditional.•Use Permit, II. MiALYSIS: ' A. General: The applicant proposes a bar:q With .business hours % etween r E 11:00 a.m. and 2:00 a.m., seven d ays. a week. Ti,�. , maximum number of employees on any ,shift will bevtwo:.,.,The ,- proposed bar would. serve beer, Wine, and sandwiches and ,. provide pool tables, bumper ppol, and shuffleboard for I recreation{ Currently, the pew Drop Inn, is located at 9131 Foothill Boulevard and. consists, of,,.a gave+ and ,restaurant. The.' Inn is'an existing nun-conforming use, �J'n that 3 it does rt�ot .ha��e a Conditional Use Permit and was;►��tab]ithed prior.i,''the City's E adoption of the Foothill Bat Y--Iard Specific Plan. The app_11cant>daes,not..,prose jbo)j it&i thje,`staff aht,__:instead ._ will provide sandwiches and.�,)'t;girt snacks to complimeht the alcoholic beverages. No ert4itairrment lt.;ropos A B. Co ` atibilit : the pri 1y. Issue involved with a Conditional Use Permit s the comp ibi3ity .With surrounding 'land uses, n The intent is that cofl�;cting:uses would be prevented as well as uses that might endanger;'public safety. It, is staffs opinion that the proposed bar, would be detrimental to' te,. public health, safety, and Welfare the to information received from the Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Station,,(see Exhibit "E"), The Sheriffs have resporlded, to� iwidents at.the Gev Ord Inn's .1� present location on roothill-',9oule}vard, These inc dents have included 'patrons bei>yg�, dr��irk iir public, fighti�r�, �pblic ° PLANNING COMMISSION'STAFF A-4;P6RT` CUP 89-29 - DEW DROP INN , Oeceriber'13, 1989 ° Page-3, It disturbances,. individuals with the possession of drug's-for sales misdemeanor ititr'.nd run-noninjury and a traffic collision caused by a; patron' .inuthe establishments, front parkjng lot. t.s According to the Sheriff, the =State Alcroho.lic' Beverage 'GoritroI Department wild' be 'reviewing the status of their alcohol. licehse due 'ic police) reports regarding 'the criminal activities. t( They potential for the above act vities,tor take place at the l\...-... .- _ proposed location c0ulc��:�caise confl ct with. existi':ng u'ses in the shoppng center Which includes offices„ medical offices, pizza restaurant, ,and general:re?sail.'. In adOt.ion, there is an existing sing-le, family residential area.directly- south of the: .center sepa.ated by A 20-faot-wide alley. Staff- is concerned about the potential. no and safety impacts orr.this neighborhood ,_;}. C. EnYiron iantaT Assessment: Upon'; G lee in of the°; , Environment a •AssessmeKt; s# f has Ae�Urmined that ,the proposed use ccu1d have petentia;� significant adverse Bract on the public health, sdfetY 4Ind general. welfare: The existing bar (which'4is proposed/lo be relocated via this.CUP) has a history of calls for: (�ervice from 'the 'Sheriff. ;arid qP arrests for drunk in public, b. 'ttery,; public- distarbance, and various drug related activities, Therefore "the 'project has the potential forr causing ibstantial adverse effects on people, either'oire4tlyor indirectly, ,. .. r� = III. FACTS FOR F1NO14GS:, Tyre. Conditional Use . Permit/ Vrbtess is intiale to"Provide adcquate mitigation of any potentially adverse impacts." There' are three findings Which tke Planning . T; Coin issiorr rust make before granting, a Conditional Use Pt mit. That the proposed use is if`r accord witti'tire'"Ger 'ral Puri; tfie objectives of the Deve opr�nt>Cate,;end the pu rVoses of the district in which the site is located, e. fiat the proposed pse, together oith the 6 ryndjtions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the pu Nl,ic health, safety, or aelfarr ', or materially. injurious- properties: or improvements in the vicinity, 3. That the ,proposed use complies with mac of the applicable provisions.of the Development tole. E`Staff believes .that the foll' owinq facts 'do ncrt su gport nlakin alb (l positive fin qLnj..regardna pub c ea Ith sa e y or we fare: F 3 c PLANNING CO MMISSIOWSTAFF REPORT CLIP 89-29 -DEW DROP INN December 13, 1989 r Page 4 , t.: a. The -Sheriff,Is Station has iesp'onded daring - several-ranttf t� the exstir '.'Dew Drop inn for ,a variety of criminal activity. 7 b. These responses include, 'but are not limited 'to, the, fallowing. J - Drunk in rpub l e,,(3)� -lalttery (2) _ _ \a Pub,lid,disturbances (3)�,_� Under the Infiuenc�of N6ecotic`,t3j - Possession of Vethamphetamine for sale (1) Misdemeanor hit arid; Tun-non%34ry (Ij - Traffic Collision (I) � c.. Yha Oew Drop. Inn's .alcohol license will be carving under administrative �revtw by the State of . California Alcoholic Severage'Col4rol Department. at a result q the above criminal actin tjl5 IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This'item has been advertised as public hearing n.,,theDaily M�ort :newspaper,., property posted, and 'notices sent tp all "property owners and existing tenants within 300 feet of the e project, f V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff reccumnds; that-the Planning Commission deny. CdRltioai Use Permit thv°ough the adoption of ;the attached,.Resolution. Res lly s d Bra .r City PI her 88,VB:j s ; Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter. from Applicant Exhibit "B" Location Map, ` = Exhibit "C" -<�Site Plan ` 1 Exhibit "D" Floor'Plan :Exhibit "E" Sheriff•"s, Mamorand►nt � ''Resolution of Denial13 �h 4 ` actober 13,:1989 TO: Planning Commission The proposed use of'the Dew Drop Inn at 9583 Foothill Boulevard; Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91330 is a'.beor, and wine beverage establishment, which provides pool tables, bumper pool and a shuffleboard - s®wreation The Pew Drop,Inn's bus.'less hours. are 11:00 a.m - 2:00.a.m., Monday through Sunday. The nuaber of employees on any shift is 'two (2). The reason for requesting a Conditional Use Permit Non-Construction is to require. special consideration, Bo that the Dew Jrop Inrircan operate in a manner,compatible with surrounding uses. Alsip the City of Rancho - Cucamonga requires it. Respectfully, �' JOHNNY , pplicaut�� Dew TMop Inn: � fJ 3 Or F CARRCAtGA MIMEcam? �'�$-2�r' s NION7TME ,�. t r.� V g Gal,Li Lb rD r "'""O r f• 1 cr i"t1�, IT zgzr ;f J r r , q `w°t y� [� [R3b�V4 El ry IIIN It OP PLAN Pt Me SCALE S-x: s.'aT.•11 tsr�fsiYs to n i i i i �a. 1 I I 1 1 I fig 1 1 11 ---- �'�.s Ft go Mc To A89.146k,jhlg� if _._._sr• 4 n� s,• -,� rr zee .�� _.._� r 1 lL N isQ 'e r/O1.®maeilin®Jib. r (( a �.t ni 0 ov- -rf , r �� cl * YCY�s1 �1 a X 'Ef°�qYE��'.t€;r��,C�Cj�S"�SCALE: .N "Y QITY"OF RANCHO CUCAM9IuO f MORANDUM AML DATE: December 5, 1989 2ROMx Virgil R. K3rrett, Sergeant Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Station a TO., Dan Colesatr, P'anning Division �' 7t • 4.4. city of gancho Cucamonga SUB3ECTx DER DROP IN21T APPLICATIOIJ. Pursuant to your request the following -information is being supplied to you in reference to the coitional use permit on the Dew Drop.In :.- gn Du.!ing the past 'several -;months in 148S,- the Rancho Cucamonga Sheriffs Station has respbndetd to the exist;ng:bar facitity of the. Dew Drop Inn, located On Foothill BoulavarR in the,City of Rancho Cucamonga., . The-o responses have been for a variety of criminal activity takir,3 place in, or around. the Dew Drop Inn establishment.- The zeftponses from -tile Shoriff's Office include. but are not limited ;.'o,',1PC 64i'/Drunk in Public on at least three occasions: PC 242/BattP.ry (physical fights: taping place at the establishments, on at least two occasions:. 'PC 415/Public Disturbances qt at least three occasions, H&g 11550/Under the Influer',e of 'a Narcotic on at least three occasions,. H&S 113784_gso.3sio1N off 'Itethamphetamino for Sala on at least one occasion, CVC 20102,/Misdomeanor Hit °and gun-$6ninjury on at least one occasion, and a tr ffic ColliUon which occurred- in the parking lot in'f;bnt of the bntablishment frgm & patron.. In addition, theref is a H&, �'. IBJpossession for Sale of Methamphetamine charge,' current .jplendiig on the owner oi' the establishment, Jonathan Wintets, this charge resulted from the service of a search, warrL '`:at his--,realdence on Henbane in the." City of Rancho CvcaM*ngdK The State Of Californian •9,,oholic :Besverage Control Department has been supplied With pQlic, reports ragarding, 'the continuous illegal activity in, and around, they DewDrop Inn tsar. The current status of, thei alcohOl license, will :be coming under administrative reviev by' R.U..C.;e - , This information su li pp ed for formal documentation of past occurrences at the Deer Drop Inn and is all pwgl,ic information from the Sheriff's Daily Log entries on tbi cory�uti�rs. { VMIikl I CITY'OF RA NC CTJC1MOrLi'i W N DIWORON a f _• EXHIBIT: / -SCALE- 1+ RESOLUTION NO.. � ,t A RESOLUTIPrIpOF ,THE RANCHO CUCPMOPGA'1?LANt 'NG:C0M6�1ISSION DENYING CftITIONAL USE, PERhiT NO«';`89=25 FOR THE`.'ESTABLISI�+4FNT OF A BAR'I'R �A LASED SP_rE OF 2,700 SQUARE .f, FEET LOCATED AT IG.�5 3 FOOTHILL 'OF' IN THE:COMMERCIAL D OFFICE QIETecT, 'SUBAREA 3 OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVAicD S�EC�F IG-PLA , ANO=-MKINO fiI NO Iffif S4I PPOPT;THE(tE'F APN: 209-261�4�7. Recitals. �--- , (i) Johnny W)'Aters has filed an application for the issuance of�}-e Conditiana'I 'lse ,,S�errni. No "89-29' as.- described in the title of +7, this Resolute.'an., ,::,Hereintxer in this Resolutipn,w ;tht sub3ept Conditional lice Permit request. is referred to.,as "the application". (ii) On the xth �f December, ;1989, the"Planning Commission of th@ City o;"Rancho Cucama conducted.. a cb'yy noticed `pUls";ic- hearing an the application and ',concluded���aid hearing an that date.. (ii4?;.Ail legal . preregdisites -•prior, to Ahe adoptio"n of this —solution have occurred 8. 'Resolution. f,. NOW, 1' EREFORE; it is hereby found, ,determined and re_3oivo,d by the Plait nc� Commission Qf:she City of Ranch;► 0icawnga as follow_ 1. This Commission hereby spec ifira?ly finds that'"tlI of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A' a f this Fecolut;on are true and correct. ! 2. Based upon suC ml stantiai evidence presented to thus- Coission daring the- abwet,=zfe�nr ,ed.,pubIic hear-ice -o�..Decen�irr ?3s: 1�$9:_ i.ncIudi7 ' written and oral staff reports, and a` report from "tl:e She�tff`s sta'VQn, together with public testimw, this;Commission hereby sp,ecifItally fi`mis iax ' follows (a) Tht application applies to property located .at 9S83 Foothill Boulevard with a= street frontage of I82a371 feet and lot,-,- of, 260.94 feet ,end is presently improved with a multi-tenant cpmu-rcjal crte , and �at k�. r.t (b) Thp, property to the north,, oast 4nd west ijf the 'subject site "is existing commur�ial, the property to, the 'scuth ,uf that sft� coos stis of existing single family"detached hams« ' (c)� The,apolitution;;is for the 'of alcoholic-beverages for_ consumption on tho premises, " 4., t� sr. PLANNING COMMISSION;RC"SO4U1 -Gh MQ CUP,89-29 Oecember 13, 1989 P age 2 ... ;. � stiE ;ect aroperty, is separated from a�% rsngle�family neighborhood by a twenty<foat-+ id �,��1?�i ; (e) the prvj�pse s, urs of ,petition :are from 11 D(} Af+l' until 2:60 AM, seuen days.a weep; k�. ch�ppincide, in.;part,41th the'PUr—s of Central Elerrrontary 5'choal,W3riah,is 1pcated"1 ss that lSOO feed away'. The application conteMlatesjthe relocation of the ex is rig Dew Drop.Inn'bar, fr n its;present location approximately one'.'half mi]e do t tpst, to the subject properby: fl (g) fhs apPi.catfor! would, not be in the best` interest, of the health, safety and ol'fare of tiie cit izen� of the City:of`narich3,wcar'dnga and '-' would be materially' ~detritrmntal fio persons.and "property in the immediate vicinity of the sub3ec site;,for:tlzV reasons as;,follas� { (i) "The' existing D4� Drop Inn`has been:the subject of a ~ rurcew of calls for szrvice from the sheriff ;during' the past several months r ' for,.a variety of:,criMiaal actIVit}� These ri rponses include, bit-,,are 'not limited to, drunk in public�{3),-battery {2)„,�ublic'disttisan�es={s,y urxier, the influence of narcotic G3`J� p95sessfon of,�i!bthamphetamiine for safe ,(1'�, misdemeanor t it and�run=non)Oh'ry; fi end tt^afi 1.0 collision W. �. ;r TIi iistirig OcwDrop :Inns r"alohoi 1YcensE �ri11; be coming under admin Asti ative -eVUAs ,by thy., State. "qf Cali;=fornia r',Al hol+c Beverage Control:DepartineYt aF,,'a res4.jFof the:hh'ove crimIn.il;,activiiryi' Thy applica0l, has .a charge currently perxiing -for possession far sale'of t'lrt'ia;��hetaspinr� f, 3i Based upon,the, facts fort ld hero na o .)iis-roMissid, ��or�sy concludes that the. approval ,oft'the Ht�r�l�cation. � .,� ,:adversely of+�ecfi^ihe _ health, safety ���` -lfare of the citi "is� f the' f, Rancho Cucad�o��a andy�;.� ' would b¢ ma er,��lly c#atr �at'd7 t0 °'p��Se�n.s. �i ,.�otrerty ,in 'the immediat,. vicinity to t.qa subject site. 4... Based upw,the,fit iings and conclusions set,rorth in ,p?rarraphs 1: zW 3. abov0,_.:th.is Cogr..ission fieY6y den ie t►je ,apptt a 5. Tire ` crei�4., tc this Co�Missior, shall certify {,� the adeptign of this Reso3pti(kt. p A"OVI4a,�'itl Aoov e) TH-is la's wAY CP Di C84XR, 1989 'I PLANKWr COMISSION OF.,o-E CI7 t3FeRANC O CUMONGA ref 5 tJ fry ' ��� PLANNT Cwmisvu ot4 pc `NJ CUP y }�f r Decemb�r �3r 1M a Aid �.Y. —Garry cN.i x, _ a irmaA ATTEST: > Bra" Ou .er; t ra-tary �' X'� r I, grad Ballenj Sec,retary 'of the P1a`nning Oomission of the City of Rant CucamDnga`�'o hereby certi, the -the foregni -,Resol'AiorC was tidy .sand 5 regularly 'it troduc�dr passov antl acid ted by,the Planning Gommissi'on oc"the City of Aandho Cucamop.3a�`at a regular mA!tigg of the Fran ir�g Cammissian held on the 1:1h :ddy af'• �we`mb'er, 1Q�9. by the fo l urging•uatA-t f-'Vitz A1lV. COMUSIONEks" � NOES:, COE1hfISIONEitSr' is A. cr ABSENT:.. .. 'C"F ISSIONERS: s � ,J t AD r e ` r f - r _ , c 1, CITY OF RANCIO CUCAPVIONGA TAWREPORT DATE: Decegber 139 1989 _ �G} T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning CO mission„ FROM: Brad Buller; City Planner BY: ban Coleman, Principal, Planner 1: SUBjECT: XEnISCn�, ORDINANCE A' .proposal. to amend, the, Rancho. Gucamonga Municipal Coda by adding a iew Chapter 19t,16 arF4'- adding a new tSection .17.02.135, pertaining to Xieiscar0 requirements. rr C I. BACKGROUND This Ordinance` and ResolutioIa were prepared at the Ci'ty Council is direction to donserve dater• in the landscape environment. The concept for t.-se docume'qts was'approved,by:the, City Council on June 21.:, Staff has been working with the Cucamonga County Water District the Ciiy''s; tingi`teering ' Divi3ion, and. landscape and irrigation experts, in drafting the 'p�?apasc; Ordinance and Resolution: Copies-of the Draft .Ordinance and ResolutiAML on were also given to the Building Industry,Associatfbin for, review andL coti6i nt. Ii. ANALYSIS: The Ordinance establishes a recoirement for Xeriscape -^ rtMPTes, to be used in the. preparation of landscape and r{gatron costructiork urans. It is z10, proposed that the Planning 'Commistion's existir17-,policy to require water saving ' landscaping and irrigjfy` n i� rtsciiPl home canpiexes;.becos�e part;of this Ordinance. The.. .'asolution creates a' systen forr reviewing landsca,?e -.and irrigat,an construction plans to ensure that Xeriscape prinei.ples a^e _JMplemented. Points would be..awarded for the various techniques;, cloyed. A ran afi, :t@ehniqu2s fcr- = - landscaping and Irrigation are defi^Ad, and include items such as, automatic` irrigai;io'n •controllers, ,dater conserving plants,, turf _ limitations, and soil' ioisture• s6hsors. Each protect must achieve i a defined min,-,wm numG�r cf paints to be.considered far epprov.ei.' Staff will prepAry a packet (if, f infa�r etion coneeming the Xeriscaps' I ordinance,' including a suggesta&I'plant listr for handout to ! ` landscape architects and builders It is 'staff SL intent, begin �= implemehting this ordinance on February 1, lgg0 for al I.oevelopment �. applications. Staff has alreaQ started alerting developers, of the proposed Ordinance. m, 1 ` IXiai G `1II ' PL NrNG1 COMMISSION�ilAfF REPORT RE: : ERISCARE ORDINANC$ December -n, 1989. 11 Page III.' RECOi+ iiN ATION Staff`reconsn ds t an . he PI and ng,"•Caiini ssi.an edopt 5e attached, solution °recmmnendirig;apprat+ai ,to City CaPat�l , . -, R s TV i Arad Or City.Plsnner BB:DC:ko . �✓ EJbit A" Res' t' ionCdnAttacments: gty`Water Dis rich ' Planning C=fssion Resolution r �t City Cooncil',Ordinance City Council Resolution i pp�q�tyM dry. r! RESOLUTION NO. I989_11-3 . � DECK RESOtUTIO(l OF''-rme ui1um.6?0&„COlPtBTY " .r `I�d ;b WATER;'UIf,�TRICT SUPPORTZ:h36 '{H `dADOPTtBN OF AN"OROIRANCE ESTABISHIAO Ji tRISWE REQ0-REMENTs BY THE CITY 'OFRANCHO, CIUCAMOROA'. WHEREAS', it is' the goal .of, the Cu.cairf cnga county �at'er District to promote water conservation throughout its ser ,ice area- and WHEREAS, the C,jty of ;RafchO Cucamonga is witti�n the service area of the the Cucamofiga County Water District; WHEKFAS the Ci}; o ,,Rdncho Cucamoinga�;�i.1.1 be cons :kerfing : doptin.g"an _Ordinance' Whch pertains to the estabI'ishment of xeH scape requirenaet�. NOW, THEREFORE►��0 IT !'SI LVEO,, that"the Cii amot�ga County Water "District hereby supports the��adaptIa of r an, Ordihance esta�lishinq� xeris.oape requirements by. iY�^ Rancho-Cdcamonda. 1 ! ' qPR OVED 14No':QOOPTED this Cast day of November, 11,989 ILA i 3. '1 o President 1 ATTEST= / / P --cre, ary �x p`v ✓.--.r r ji � $f a e r 71 .'r STATB, CF CALIFORNfA COUNT" tlF SAN BERNaINO ' r l t T °S,layd W .Michael r, duly a�spo`intedecrete�ry o khe l� Board of Direr cks . '� Cudilnori County Y1 ,.ez Di �r sat ' 1[ HEREBY, CERTIFY h'mt EY#e Tshziv acid forego s� ;� 3� a,� ��1`,y"��ue (i and carr�cC c, o -Rsso3u3czri too:; i939 11 3 _ and'r he ssme:l�as nok ��`em am�nde�i or t�pQaied y h y � D Nuverbst'' 9994 AmEAs a F. (SEAL) rr a e zy 'Boar '] ee t RESOLUTION NO. i+ RESOLUTION 1?F THE RAONO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION' RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 14.16 AND ;SECTION 17.02'OP THE:RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TD XERISCAPE 'EQUIREMENTS NHECEAS, on"the ,13tR day of Decemher,11 1989, the Planning CC'Mission held, a duly advet•tised public hearing,,,Pursua6t to "Section 55854 of the California Government Code. NOW'THEREFORE, BE ;IT RESOLVED, 1. That p4rsuant to Section 65850 to 558S5 of the California Government' Code, that the Planning Commission of„-the—r- ty of Rancho Cucamonga hereby, recommends that the,<''Lrty Cpsncii approve and adopt ` the attached Ordinance' aitdnding "title .14 of„.the Rancho Cueamonga Muslicipal Code. 2. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Com»issio7 shall be farwtarded to '.,ee City Council. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS:I$TH DAY yOF'DECEMBEP.11','1989. PLANNING C(kffl�SIQN OF T H C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA a ; BY: r arry-'t'-1mcReR; Cha'i�rindtt r A+:TEST: _Orad ggulTer, ..ecreeary f . 1, Br94, 81t 11er, Secretary .of tote Planning; C slosi Of tha City of Rancho Cticmmnga, do hereby certify that, the foregoing,,;iesolution Dais r!ly and regularly introduced, passedy and ado�►ted by the P1`hniig Cammiss s„ of the. City of Rancho CUCLlonga, at a regular meting �f th�2;°,pl�nnirg C +mitsion held on the 13th day of`Oecanber,F 19891,by the foliow,ing vote-to-tuft AYES: C"ISSIONE S: NOES: C11,M SSIONERS: L WENT:, 1CWSS-i�NERS: I * z ° � L � ORDIm.jH vc AN ORDINANCE OF, THF.Cd l°COdNCYL',OF THE CITY OF RANGW`Q ;-�) c CUCAMONGA, CX.IF(RNIA,,,AOOI9G A PtN CHAPTER 19,164'AND ADDING ANEW SECTION ?7.02,255,�,10''Taii RANCHO CU f1MONGA MUNICIPA(CODE' PERWHING V'ESTAGLTSN'ING XERISCAPE RFQUIREMENTS i 7. ik THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY`OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES OPDAIN AS FOLLOWS: ;T .r SECTION 1n The Ranqha Cucat[anga Muriicipal'Ctle Is hereby amended by adding Chap e"t�r i 6 thereto to, read,, in words and. ffgurs* as.failows: Chapter :9.1b XERISCAIt REOUIREMENTS Sections;' 19.16.010 Purpose artd Intent. 19.16.020 .�4.riscape:definition. 19.16,,OX applicability. 19.16:040 Exceptions. 19.16.050 Procedure, 19,16.060 Xeriscape reouimmnts. 19.16.070 Modol Ho41' m , 19.16.080 Statutory autlrori ;y in case of .caraflictiaag prodisions,, "19.16.011.0 Purp os ,.ard Intent. Wafer is an ircreasingly,ltimited and costly res`oi?rce, s�a `enc o ;'"this chapter to establish a. water' �t conservation plan to reduce watex,cansumpticn'ir1 the landscape errvironmeni , ,, using Xeriscape;pri cipies. 9;16 D2A.Y0�is_ca__ppe Definition. «Xer�scape� Thai� man � j1 combfirati6n o an soap s 4ures an xechhi ues ihat iss the:aggregato reduce the demand for stud conses9aptfon of wa`ber, in ludfng aparopriate Tow 44ter using plants, ns,n.'119inN growgi�Dvt?r, a low pe' entaa_e o€ turf coverage, permeablg'' , paving and skater co virag`M1 tTwrigat�ara technicuesi Viand systems. "19.16 03¢''flpplia;aaili$y. A11 re.qu'ired landscaping plans slain comply; wit 'Pixv` ons-o"i:n 's - ptt and the Xeriscape Asset*mnt'' System. "19.16.040 Exceptions. The folloWrig shall be,exempt fry the pr^ovisiQn, a s chapter- %ITY COUNCIL ORDI 4.CE 'Y®. RE: XERTSCAPE REQUIREMERTS Page 2 A. Yards f6r single family homes, except 1rdel homes as required by Section 19.16.070, B. Interior remodels, tenant improvements and demolitions. C. Schools, parks, golf courses or similar public open spaces. �r D. Change', of use. E, Projects which do not require a ConditionafAse Si Permit, Developmei/Design Review or residG!;tial subdivision. F. Structuraljadditions or detached structures which do. not result ;fin an increase of more than 10!�of the floor area, or 1,000 square feet, whichever is greater. G. Reoiacement, or'eepair of existing plant material or irrigation sysflws in conjun tion ,with routine maintenance. "19.16 050 Procedure The City Plan.ler,and City Engineer shall establish .a formatfor plans and c,lq other p ecedural guidelines for submittal as deemed necessary. "19.16060 Xeriscape Requirements: A Xeriscape Assessment System adopted by Kesolutiono e y oonc shall establish Xeriscape.criteria for review of landscape and irrigation plans. The Council shall establish as l part of the assessment system the minimum number of point,^,-a project is required to achieve to receive approval of the plans. "19.16,670 hiodel.,Homes.' To:promote water consermtW on through education-,—a s n a am y residentiai.developnoents wish more than two ` models planned, shall Landscape at least one model entirely with water saying landsccping and irrigation in, accordance with the following requirements: 1. Plant Materials: Each."water saving",model shall contain exc :as vely low water use plant materials as identified on a list available from the Planning Division. Other low water plants may be.approved by the City Planner. 2. Irrigation System: Each."water saving" model shall con n exc us ve y an Irrigation system that provides a high efficiency in water application according to-'site conditions. Drip;or tr,.ckle may not be used in turf areas). 6-7 ,i CITY COUNCIL OROIR43CE NO. � RE: XEAISCAPE ktQ0 RCMENTS Rage 3 3. Signs: Each "water saving" model complex shall_, p�rov, a the folltwing info-oration to.potential buyers: a) Front Tard' Sign: A four (4) squar(t foot-sign s '1EToca ed in the front yard,!of each "water saving" model such, .that it is cleakAy visible to buyers. The sign shall indicate,that the model features a'water saving 1,i�dscape and irrigation des!gr.,','. b) Interior •Dis lay A drg4ing, or combination of rewings, s a �e displayed inside each "water saving" mode.}_or the sales" office which provides a schematic ' tN,e 'landscape. These drawings< shall include a key, ideitifying the common same of the plants used 1,0 the ",►tter saving" model yards. A brochure with the same information may be dtistribnled with the sales information to potential 6a4rs to satisfy th;s requirement. 4. Literature: Additional literature d'esribing water conserving landscaping,and irrigation S;s encouraged to also be m. availabhe to the potential�;%uver �` referenced on the interior display, or broci;zn '"., "k9.16.080 Statutory authority in case of conf`rttting provisions. 4 Nothing in s chapter s a I I be deemed ra a ee , anna or a roga any othjr laws or ordinances pertaining or applicable to the'properties 6A areas aft acted by this chapter._ SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding Se— I0 2.135 to read, it words and. figures, as follows: "17.0e.135 General Development Standards. The provisions of this . -. section s.s p y a ebe o �1 WIVn•n the airy ot= Ranchd Cucamonga, unless otherwise specified herein.' 1. Water Conservation: Landscaping`)Jnd irrigation must be. es tr,'e crnserve;water through u3ing the print"04's of "%riscape,'as defined in CRaptBr` 19.16. of the hanchr C?Vamorga.Municipal Code, 6xcc�nL 4ere' ,exempted 06Lecin. SECTION 3: The provisions 6f this Ordinance shall not apply lt forsprocessings which have :een appMovei or accepted as complete prior to the effectffe crate of this Ordin X e; provideA nt;.materiai amendments or extensionu are made to such previously approved projects. . k 3 C. U e. ..7 d V�SOLUTIOts NO. ' tr ° A RESOUTI6 THE CITY ttOLWCIL OF TH CITY OF RUM - CUCAMONV, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING nARISCAPE ~'a ASSESSMENT SYSTEM i.`kk REVIER OF LAN.05 APE AND IRRIGfrl"I,ON Vill PLANS WHEREAS, the ICJ ty Coun`ciI of the City ©f RancY,o Oucamc,ga,has,adopted - Ovdinanc7ee No: establithing'3ter $cape` equire!renls in the landscape environrent to rreuace 'the consumption of Water, which requires that a Xer scapQ`Asyes:ment System for review of landscape and irrigat., Tans°be established. NOW, THEREFORE` 8931r R� OLtl D by the City Council th t .a Xeris'fape C Assessment System is,hereby estab�yished based upon the followi'Q criterid; .^ SECTI`iN ::o DEFINITIONS( 'r A. "Permeable Paving" shall mean a paving materf%a,,, that permits water penetrat on a%so e-p h of I'G 1nchesi or more, inclUdingtihori-paraus surface material' pour 3 or- laid in secvions not exceeding one sq are foot in area ,and collectively comprising less than Um-thirds of the total surface area of the lot and loosely'laid materials, such asp crushed stone or,,-gravel. h. "_Planted Area` shall mean the'totai area of the-size covered by bui1d�'ngs, par ing jots,,. driveways, or streets,-,and shall include patios, , piazas, ,sidewalks, hardcaurtss swimming pool,$., spat and p�rr�� areas, C. '!Turf" shall mean a single-bladed grass or sod: - ".0 ; Water Conserving Plant" shall mean any plant which' exhibit�,;, drought toleraPI ciarsc er ss cars, at is to say: will, in d4signed location, survive with lift tp supplemental !dater. t 'rathon or" other, hybrid fescues and warm season grasp rW-a- .be.,considered water* conserving. A listing of these plants shall be moje availa�a by the'Ci,y Planner. j SECT.IO►1 E :L1 SCAPE:CRIzKbtrr - c -: The City, Planner and City_,Engineer 'shall, review each project for compliance with the Xeriscape-Ordinance. A project mus4 receive 'a minimum of 60 points in this categmry. 3 - r IT �R CITY Cat.ICIL R£SOLUT10 Na. M. X0.4CAPE ASSJESSKEitr SYSTEM ; Page 2 #i ue Landsca a Techniq ue�. 9 � Points ; 1. Wa£e.m conserving plants`"used in'75% or more 20 of total p1,�nted area. 2. Turf<lim;'eed=ias follows: 2a ., a. Residential Pr4o,-3 45%-of total plartUd area; b. All Other Projects'Z 25% of total planted;area 3. Plants i laced or graumid according tto tt it 10 watering needs. 4. Hardscape (non-irrigated) surfaces, such as 5 alluvial rock or decorative'rpaving, used in f iaS o .,more of total planted area. 5. Permedhle paving used to 5S of total planted area. 6. Where tjrf is usAd, u$ilize proven varieties of 5 A lower Ilater rnqul°rement turf,:,such as"Maeathon: 7 Where no.groundccver is used ut[liae.woad chips,. 5 bark, or other*aulch, to a de* 6f 3 1nches.on. top of exposed soil, such as Underneath shrt�R3 or landscape fabric,under-soi 9,. a,, Soil amendments to improve water hold!incapacity of soil,., where sail eondi.tians merit.. SECTION 2: IRRIGATIC3t CR17ERIA The City Planner and City 2'ngi,neer° shall: revise each pro3�ct fcr ' complianLa with the Xeriscape 0pdfinance,, A project must receive a 9ipfit of _. 60 points in thfis�catego v - Irrigatiorr Technique �S Points / r //' I. Lost grfltortage fir���ation system; or higher 2®;j gallonage systems with aotortatic controller capable of repeat cycling, used for More than., ' 7EZ of total planted a4ga. t4r'ip orytfickle v not be, used in turf' art:nsy. 2..:.'Automatic controller for. lrrigeL on 4etemt— 20 � tij� Vol CITX' COUACIE::A, IaN N0. y r�: XERIScaP� �,tESSMEarr s,YsTEm Page 3 1 v, 3. IF-!Kation syste%•`designed to wat,O 'plants 10 #ccordin, � thef�raater, needs C i``aay IaAd�cap naherrials which r�pc+..ire differehi.;�'-rA11g needs arc irrigat:d by separate coptrol'Val are ). r 4. Soil:-moisture sensors Ce.g,.- snsio etera u3e in ;h, 0 con�unctiot�`;:i�r-�ator.�tic•cantrolie,:_,� ,._._.-R .._ . . ,4, S. !*<ain sensors Cls.g. itaincup� used>in,cpn3unction 5 iyl r with automati� contrallev- - 6; Wind sensors Ce,g. anemometer)�used in coRinrction{ 5 ^ , with.automatic controller, 7. Irrigation is sensitive to s1op'ei �actors R e. 16-w.. 5 gallonage heads, ater� basins) oe)pRodect �fas`�ho, slopes poster than 5'feet in height wlrich7re4gre, landscaping,, " 8. Use of reclaimed or recycled water. S Aft Y -t 1+r r� t t LL ? I .`t 71 , _ l � � �` � !a ✓ G r,CITY OF R.ANCIIO CUCAMONGA DATE: '' .06;:ember 13., 1989 :a TO: . Chairman and}Members of th`e,plannin% Commission FROM: Brad B411ir, City Planner BY: Brett,Horner, Associate Planner SIlBaECT: ENVIROfJMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW '89-16 - Yne-development o Vrestauran a a, 35 square feet within the Terra Vista Town-Center;on 'i acre of land grin the. Community Commercial District; of Terra Vista1-Planned Community, located at,the"northeast corner of Hagen Aven'0 and Foothii'l Boulevard - P1J: 1077-491-0S. I. PROJECT AND 'SITE DESCRIPTION: The appl fcant, requests `that this item, be .continued a e anuary 10, 1990 meeting in order to allow more time,,to address the G2sign ReView,Committee comments_0 November 16, 1989. f .;L Res tfully mlitted, rad 1 er - — - P1a aeyi BB:BH:ko �:,. Attachments: Exhibit "A" Letter Requesting;Continuance`,' - E 1 �p�y4 r 1`l r � Decembar 6, 1989 ,l Mr Srett Horner Cit of Rancho Cucamonga `Planning • s 9840 Beee Line<, " ?! Rancho Cucamonga,, CA S lV29 I RE., Planning Age'hda De4ir Mr. Horner: We request, that- the review of: Chii 's protect be taken off th December 15, 1989 agenda and placed or. the Jenuaryr 1q. 193 agenda it oroer for us to have 'more. "-time icc " psCepar+ our materials. Your ccoperation in this £fort is greatly a'preciL,tad. Tf YOU have gUvalh ons, Z Can be contacted at 714/998-7126. fi Sincerely, Tam Orzvch Conutructicn ifanager TO•slp cc., Buddy Forehand x/ ; 17" 682AL8JfM'"ysoi 200117e1t ;4ex 75240!(2I4}9> 9�1� ` CITY brAANCHO CUCA ONGA T"FiPO ` ' DATE; Deceirber 1;3, ?9$9 L TO. Chairman and Me.ribers of the .PlAnning CO mnissi'on' FROND. > Brad Buller, �City Pl4pner BY: Jerry Guarraeino,`Assistant:Pia ner . SUBJECT: E;ilIROWENTA! ASSESSMENT AND DEVEi.6'MENT REVIEW 88-40, ' ND A - he evel opment o in ustria b(i "dings tota ing'5 ,109 Squae feet as' Phase II of a 10,2 acrb idustrial park An the 'GeheraI Industrial District, SuhirEi'8 of the Industrial.Sp�ific Plan,,;located at 10955 Arrow Route - Aw., 1 209-W-33. Associated Frith this is Tr►te. Removal Permit No 89-•55. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION,____ A. Action Requested.. ' Approval of the site plan, building elevations, 'conceptual gr.Wriq ` +Ian, :landscape plianss Tree Removal Permit, and.,issui,ike of a'.Negat#ve Declaration. B. Surrounds+ ta rid Use and Zatii;�t,s;, North - Past office; Industrial SpeCi 4 Plan (Subarea 7) .South- .Vacant land; Industrial SpMf,16 Puri.(Subarea 8) East - Vacant land..-Industrial' Specific Plan:.(Subarea 8) west - General industria;, Indl.striaT Specific Plan (Subarea 0.,.' Generz I�1an OeSfonat#fins: pro Joe t Site Geri al Industrial Borth - Industrial -Park >. South - General industrial East General Industrial West Ganerai Industrial O. Site Characteristics'. The 9.5»acre siiti Oet) presently contains an. ex IStIng 118;600 square foot r ifehouse hui Tding The existing parking area contains several nature trees. C�+ , gutter, sioeaalE;, and some parkway land�.iaofrg are existirq NOW along the Arrow Route frontage. ITE1 I ky PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT RE: DR 88-40 - GARCIA &.ASSOC. December 13,-1989 Page 2 E. Parking Calculation9 (•" Number of Number of TYI:e 'Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided' Existing Office 5,465 _1/25o; 22 22 Existing 20,000 1/JOCO 20„ 20 Warehouse' t0,QD0 1/2000 10 10' 73,ia0 1/4000 18 18 ti Multi-Use 63,831 1/400 135 135 r Excess Spaces g ct� 11. ANALY SI S• A. General: The applicant is requesting approval to add 53-831 square feet of;;-multi-use tenant space to an.. existing industrial-use sf le. The iE,rovenents nc:ude 3 new stru.,�ures rangier in size ;r!om 11,006 square feet to 26,0q, square,feet (see Exhibit "B"). Buildings A and'B are separalld by a large outdoor plaza araa with raised planters, beraches,� bike racks, 1 and picnic tables (see Exhibit "C"). Building �,.on the east side of the s i-ce Will froot onto Vincent Avenue, 'Mich will be constructed from Arrow Route to the, southerly ledge of the sub3ect site. A second lunch plaza $r•ea has been provided on the east side of the site, for accessibility to employees from Building C and the existing warehouse structure. B. Off-Site. Improvements: The-applicant' PrOgQEIS construction of t e-westerly two-th�i►ds of Vincent Avenue rand a portion of the intersection of Arrow Route and Vincent Avenue. This aspect of the proposal is contrary to UK"nesring Division policy requiring the construction of full-lidthl rather L, than half-width streets. Vincent Avenue should be constructed to its ultimate width with curbs and,gutters on both .fides. Due to the development o -_;groperty on the south side of Arrow, Route between Red Oak Street and Vincent Avenue, the pave+*nt width var•,es from site to site. This condition, together with the increasing traffic volumes through this area, have created a confusing and potentially dangerous condition. 'Therefore, Arrow Route 'should., ; widened 10 its ulti+rate.►�idth from Red Oak Street .to Yinucnt Avenue as a condition •of ,approving ;I additional development'in this area. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement`ta recover the cost of constpuctirig off Site improvements from future development ' of; adjacent properties. 4, "I PLANNING COMMISSION STAF REPORT i•, RE: OR 86,-40 - GARCIA & ASSOd' Oec.ember 13, 1989 P ag''a 3< i C. Designn�Reviecc� Comrritiee: The Design Review Committee (ChItiea, r' Toisoy,C�Iema�reviewed this project on November 2, 1989 aM again on November 16, 1989. The`torrottee (Chitiea,; Tolstoy, Buller) recommenced= approval of the project with the ;fallowing conditions.. 1. Extend the bu'�ding, accent stripe across, the 3 moll-up d� on the southeast corner of Bui 2. Provide veF tical scoring only,, rather tha a block pattern ,on all •sandblasted panels. The specific :• 'detail .for the. scoring should bP,. reviewed and `,' approved by ;the,,Planning Divisiorr.� 3. Provide a blow-tip,';,of, the second employee eating area.: font Staff review' and •approval. Note: Permanent concrete furniture, is required, for these eating areas; the final de jign'0 which must be approved by:staff. 4. Extend the landscaped area north of Buildinga4 so that the wal[way to.,the �pIaza w0l cro� tale driveway at a 90-degreeangle. 0. free Removal Permit: Pursuant to'Ordinance No, 1276,.pertaining to the presarvat•ton of trees on private propertyj� an arborist's . report was Prep6,red' to evaluate the health and-st`�uctore of•:the 54 h&itage trees now on,the site. These 54 tree: were planted Prior to inca rPoration when the, prope,aty was. first developed, and'exist riiti in the dld. parMng-lot where -Buiiiing 'W' 'and`'.r8`i _._i are przposed' (see,Exhibit °G"). The report identified 2 trees which could be preserved in place, 15 trees which are suitable for transplantation and. ' recommended the removal of the i remaining 37 trees. Approximately' one-half of the trees designated as preservable :(17 trees) cannot,be be transplanted mainly because of structural problems., 0nly;;2 tk*s can be preserved in place under the proposed site' plan. The project will be conditioned to carmply with the findings of the arbor ist's report. « E. Environmental Assessment: ' Upon rep, iew of Part I of thi, Initial Study and cow let ion of LPart, II of the Environmental GNrecklist, staff` has identified the following .potentially significant inpacts. which require mitigafiion as identlfied''beloi�:;'° PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF. REFORT RE: OR 88=40 - GARCIA & As SOD. Oecember 13,,1989 Page 4 t 1. The -project, Will resuit' in i;he removal of 54 neriEaga trees which are protected 'by Rancho Cucair�nga h nicipal Code, Chapter 19:08', Pursuant lF, to.$ C M.C. Section 19.08.100,,the proj ctr-wil l' be conditioned:,te provide replacdfrent treed ori.a one- for-one basis with ,the 1 YFgest nicr�Sery grown ., s. tree(5i ava iiabl ¢ritir too �cupatzcy`. 2. The existing ,paverient wi dt�, al'otrd .Arrow varies from site to site. . This .condition, -1:640,ther With invrearing""trafic''volume , create a confusing and potentially, dargerous '1 ;traffic condition. Therefare, ,tlie project is...recamnded ?to be conditioned to widen Arrow Route to its ultimate width Pram Red Oak,Stil,et=='tn Vincent Averuae. Therefore,: staff recd*ends Aswance 0' . gative Declatiition based upon 'these conditions of approver: Wh ich ;are �ncorpfl�atetl y into the project. ` III. RECOMMENDATION:; It is recommended 'that the PlAnr9iriq.`Eomtission con si er .a input and>`elements of Development Rev 1esv 88 Q4 if after such consideration, the Commissioh,'care rec,ommand ;approval, then adoption of 'the attached Resolution and, issuarx a .of a Native Declaration would be appropriat+ :., Resp :'Ily ed. tl t 8r B 68: :ko 1 Attachments: Exhibit 'IN' Vicinity Map �. 4! ExhWt 118" - Site Plap Exhibit "C" ,Circulation Exhibit "O" Lands Plan Exhibit "Ell - Elevations .i Exhibit "F" - Tree jPlain Resolution of Approval h Conditions wiit � 3 k .1 Original Poor Quall'ty 71 1 F``ff �� {�'� @_`'�.,�+✓ �`;° "mil`_' _ � `-"s 1; Ell r�� 9^I i �- any:r •�—�.— �—t��� d Fd'` t d� r,C I 1 2-4 i 1 __ 5-7 - N CO Original Poor Quality • �� ! a! ft �r Q q tit 11 d 1 ({ j g gg£' 1 g iiili i e i ppi `{�i sEpa 10 i Gin 33sg vs fill� qq a 3a 9 ;t !t t E L• LS 9 1' S w�'w:a� BR'p' 2 i 311Dal �• cc W ! y f .. . tail 17 IN �a , ;fir `•? 4 Original P06 Quality IT EnNUVINHONIA y.qj,-N i 4 nail 'LLI� •Ci'. m �f her 1 « o �f• F ¢ ` ems•..._ JH F a r g S^ Iw s e- ' � j � C s .s ; � �• � t �� T•t�'A,lt .Ia 9 .f. �� �., ICI r Original Poor Quality z LO c3 L+ �r +* i i r •S..is 'fit 1E 3 t.:� r t' S #aa4 /_;,..C� [._�i-�^ t ♦ £) B. jnN,AV L LallNII, I 4j" r d+_tjtjt77j33 t �g177 CO orS _ t� a Original Poor fr�+cal�ty -p W q-� W CD O.+ Wes... � T ¢ < V ♦ `(AllO2 o iL �j j� 74 cts co 2 • M- 11 �^ 1` 4 r r 7 e g r _I. q pp ss Original Poor Quality W i •ills i ip 3 � •a9c. E. y��: tay� •-- r�p` � p` L R •y tf i ;�, ��a 5 i�� V �t E rr > 1 ! t •r m G1� �1"-1 n (J/ Original Poor Qu iity g 'U qw irk _-- -••-- �,4�R31.[eTi 12,233 i! i y��" — — _� •� F 1' 7s to n y t y� ._• C- ZY iMi I. • 3aj� .; Y. -.;t Y :fig. "6 Ovi 14 ca 03 p F •� { ? ft• Cd } REVLOTION NO. A RESOLUTION'S a r THE .RANCHO CUCAMONGA,PLANNING, COMISS.1ON APPROVING DEVE�.OPMENTZ3EVIEW NO. 8840, LCiCATED AT 10955 ARROW ROUTE IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 8) - APN. 209-142-3$, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A, Recitals- (i) Garcia & Associates has filed an application for the approval of Delelopment Review Na. 88-40 as described ii the title 'of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this. Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application". ' (ii) On -the 11th day of Decembers 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a m° irq, on the application and' concluded said meeting on,;that date. (ii ) All legal prerequisites 'to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, =THEREFORE, it is Hereby found, dete.rmi�-ed and, resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows; 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presd'ilted, to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on December 13, 1989,; including Written and oral staff reports, this Coninission hereby specifically finds as follows: .(a) The application applies to property'locatQd at 10955 Arrow Route with a street frontage of 670 feet and lot depth of.710 feet and is presently improved with a 118,000 square foot warehouse buildiog, and; (b) The property to the north of the subject site `is, a post office, .the property to the south of that site consists of vacant land, :the - Property to the east is vacant land,, and the property to the west is General Industrial use. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence preseote'd to this.Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facto set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this; Commission hereby finds ;and �� 1 concludes as follows,, ` 1� ,w .D i, h 11: PLANNING COPiMIS$IOti RESbL6TTOff ND.. j RE:• OR 88-44— GAY CIA lk ASSM',) � December, 13, 1�ij89'1 S Page 2 Fa) Thlat th pknpose+m;�ro ect is consistent with t} objecttvgS of the General Pian ; aitd : � (b) 7tiat the pro posed use is in:accord with the objective of,, the O'evelopment Code and th6 purposesVgr" the district in uttit`h the site is , located;, ands (c Proposed"Use z) ihat ti it each of''then � . . applicable provisions of the Deve19ptnont--C(Ae; and ld) That the proposed use, together with : the conditions applicable thereta, 'W4,T1 hot be detriftntal to the public health, safety, or. welfare, or materially injuriouS-, tol properties or improvements in e=;.. vicinity. �t 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies-that the pro jut bias ' been reviewed and cgnsbglered in eo*liance y i'th the California Environoj. t. I Qua'iity Act of 1970 a lz ,further, thiss'_Cai"tvsissicn hereby.,issues;.,a; Negative. Declaration. �f#,t $I Sased upon the findings pd, conclusions,sWforth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this clomis0on ite'reby approves the application subject, to eat`:, and every condition set: forth;,,below andi�r the attached:`Standard Condifi ns, attached; hereto and ;ncorporat,,d Ierein by this refemnce Pla.nhinq Division: 1) Exted-the Wjldi i�;�accent, s.l'ipe across-the`3 roll�Qpdoors on" the southeast corner of drailding. 8, - Z)` Provide 'vertical scbring only, rasher than e b:�_k pattern on all sandblas c"d panels. Th-m specific, .detail farw the- sa&1ng shall hi; reviewed and approved!by 'the Planning.D 0sib;I during Matz checks' 3) Rrovid.e a bloc-up of'tite ritizlayce eating area 64st of the 6Xisting WTciirxg far staff review and appto,vaT. dote kermanmt concreie furniture is regltiretl for ti-si eit'ing areas; ' :the final design of zvh7ck milt be approvedzl�by staff, 4) -A.4ttailed tarxl!�capeplan shall be submitted to 11 staff showir� those trees to be,,.xramoved., relocated ��nd preserved Jn , place per tFe An or.ist's report. i Plf1N�,L C( 1F}TSSION'fiESt7�lflItlN N0: RE. Ok,,;g8-4t1 cARCIA _14 ASSOC., December 13,°1�89 . t Page 3 Ask " 5) Tree Removal Permi No. 89-65 is heretsy approved as follows: a) Trees 'Nos. 3 and, shall.:be preserved An place,in accardance with ,Rancho Fuca^ «ga Municipal Code". Section:`19.:06. and in " t accordance with the recommendations110r of the arbpris, s report, ,including, but not tim ted to=protective constructiowbarriers and �`peclal grading techniques 'Which,shail.,, bd" _notet3-on' the grading puns ,Prior, to iss iapce::af rormits. { b) Trees Nos.'32,'14 22, 25, 26r 29, 32 42, 46-,49, and 52-54 shat I_be .piwserved by transplanting "elsewhere arf ti-a site; in accordance^.With the retommer�ations of the arbnr3 _!s,:report; prior'%o occupancy. The applicant shalt -contract with a qualified arb.orisi, apprdved by the City<���nker, to assist, the appl.ica;A0s enginee> in preparing the grading �;lr:`v"d to supervise said trap�splenling. trunks -of transplanted trees„shall .shown oa the ' i; ading plan. c) The remaining trees shall be removed and rep',aced on a one-for-one 'basis y�ith. the largest nursery, grown trees) ava_?able as determined; by the City Planner, in , accordance with Rancho,, Cucamonga Minicipal Code Section 19.08„100, prior to occupancy., d) Replacement trees and transplanted trees' sh4,,l be clearly identified in the detailed Unfscape plans. 1 i, tgko..leeriM Div:Is.ion: i, i tiff-site ,dedication for the construction °of '. Vincent Avenue` and for 'the:extension of ,Arrow Route through. the White OaklVncent r intersection and transition.' ,shall be obtained f prior tor the issuance of building permits. !` 2) A ,lot line adjustment shijl be 'recorded to incorporate the portion of AF">{, 209-14 -06, between the existing ,east property line and.the proposed llincent� Avenue alignment into AM 2;01-142-33 prior to ;the issuance of buildj.rr p2 mits, �•, �y p'�ANNINS C. MISSIQN�RESLTIPN NO. RE: DRAB-40'`QARCI;A Oece►rber 13„ page:4 y Y ) t) 3) Vincexrt.,Avenue shall '6e con,siructgd full width ' from Arrow tlo�;to _ to �10e. swath pro j.eat houhdary.. off-site pargWay imprav:rrrent ;,jnay,be deferred until development of the .ddj-acant , ;properties a F►e developer .may Y,-kuett a .. ur.S re t a reeawnt to recoYe!^;t e cost of _, :cor tructing-=riff 4sitei-4r,40 bran frog future develapn . �� ; 4) Provide standard property4ine-48jacent s idewalk on Vincent-Avenue. ' a � S) ;The, Lxisiing r- oVen4ead utilities „ ,telQcomnicaions end �rlec'�riia5) on `'the Project side" -of i,Ar jVW ' rou*e ; shall ''be" undargraunded along tldeentire p ect frontV6 ex",ending to the fart R-le off> 'lie (east arxt _ t §t) p^io�r to pupa ip1 i roYe�senL'ncceptance dr 4 occu�ans_y; `,Whychever occurs {i st' The r deYelapar mdy`'Gequest.a retiirks�ir=sn�pent agreement to recover-one-half the, City-ad�pfed cost far tndergWaintirw from 'fui rre dev :iogmaht as it 4, i occurs ou the opposite side'-'iof the street, 6) Street improvements 6n the,south side of=Arrow Route shah. tie:-csnstructed as fitllows: a) The wt step ly driveway shall bL relocated M near the west project,boundary titre drive approach shall,be a minimum of 35 feet wide r and constructed to City Standard`No. 306. i An easement for:, shared access 'shall b'e pvlovvided in favor 6f. the parcel to the i b) All existing drive approaches Arrow. Route shall` be rer..oved and rep;z`aced With curds and nutter, including the t2rrparary driveway ne7i r the-etst pi�?iect b�.idZry"f�vr Y MR M-19. c) Improvements ,shall, te'rd easterly tfi:r9urh - the ultimate BR:,on loge.-.ast '.side of,the- !, ArrtuOlncent� (White Oah), intersec�t$oti� Provide- a'•tr4nsition ta,._ thee ". existirx3 pavema�-, to the satisfaction a� the City Erx veer. The, ;do46)uper may request a reimbursement sgroement to•rec9ver the cost of Lrrrrsi;ructirty I Mpr°oveMents,east Vincent Avenue centerline': fromfttture •: .'• deve epment. w '1 - 1 PLANNING COM-MISS1Ofi RESOLuTiON N0 777 RE; 'OR 88-40 = GARCIA &.ASSOC. Oecerrher 13, 1989" ; page"5 d) Improvements shall extend tveste 1 'y t o the r existing VR on the .east side`of Red Oak Street, Off-site parkway improvements may be deferred until developmnt of the adJacent property. Thi developer may request a reimbursement a5reemenir to ecover the cost of c0istructing off-site < -improvements from-futvre=devel-opri*,o-, 7) Landscaping within the "Limited Vse, Areas" for all ..pro;j'ect driveways and the intersection of ArroW ncent (White Oak) shall be approved b� the City ?raffic Engineer. 8} !i deposit sh:el7, be posted with :the, City rl covering the estirnater cost oft apportionirg the sssessrrents . under Assess�m"t .:Oista ict'T`82�1 amc+rw; "the reconfigured parcei`s ¢b+ to the tot Tri �s -adjustment prior to the, issuanirc. of ildtng permits.- 6. The w cretary to this Commission sha11 certify' to the,,adoption of th:s R,:-sglut;on. APPROVED AND POOPTEO THIS 13TH OAY OF DECEMBER, 19t)'. PLANNING C041lSSION.OF THE CI1Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: S Larry T.'*N e , airman r ATTEST: B�ra3 Eu ler, Secretary I, Brad Fuller, Secretary of the plan�rng Corirhissiorr of�'the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing, p:15olution Was, duly and regularly-, iitroduced, passed", and adopted by the Planning .Comission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the planning Commission held on the 13th day of Decenber;, 1989, by the following, vdt4-to-4it: Jh AYES:` COMISSIONERS: IDES: COMMISSIONERS: 'ABSENT: eq;;hlISSIONERS: / <r h � rf(J, n „ Ly1 Gf `, Si �L�pp 3 C q Pit �b4t}+. Yd1,2 f�e�jS ppp! � wOw 48' Oyu,W ya 4Q 'jc.".�a oOc�k� G�l�$� e.N�� �4. �"d � a.4u �u�x"�r. &N4 Qv N .�`ct as : : `r�s V 1� $ Y -,w Sal. � •�w�^ N 4gyL _ i`o1 ::i MO CpN y N �n�4�a G`'AA � �O� p ;pa�`; '^ O y '.4 4,44E .. �. .ap�ic C•Y;N Oy �y 9I i^ `46^ ��yiiV � y[y� a 8 Y 4. q�1 i4 4C QA� .: 1tN�4u? vco'mY $'.' a w«i �3 F.N,wrdF�'s 0 ��M33Lti 1'9¢at3 r`g"� aw � 53'" Py�M Ac.' g� O ^ a �+ ,$pyJ p N r1 Y. •UUCP' .'wig 6.�1H •Y : N'P CI.YrY vQ}y� ` m o ��.. a Mira lana a! Mv di 40 cl) I 168m a N � apes s S^ him 4 d ' a r NA, . ®� ram.Y W C y� Y1�,. .Y L^Y ��.° �i^�- gdy�Lg^�mi. .Y.s»Za`�pi' q sg� S p 0:4, 4LLY Y�O O2.�GN�® a4 W N09 O WY$, espy y.�w+ WL� sN"Q s L 2S�N' 6VY"' Cro�Y w++ YS6Y Q1$yW`.� sY�o$ V pY� �® 'W" Y^Cewsa `9 .. ry �F`AWtl�TNu6 �Q�y YrA C ao6$ G �' fCCiy O�° '. ,•IG lyyi L,�,CC� C.Q ar , � 44NtT �TOL. W Lw �p'gqp.. ="r Gam (ac1...6G `N� qIn '$p=�.CL 'V q.00� .C..api0�`" Y� •RCpCp l••. N�� i..: `w0(�. "OV,=�°'Y•Y1 '�V_ ^"�L � : ^:W.�N lM �� a{� L 4$ W �.Y■�V���'`YI 'OC ; .,WY •tiV'. itVu�Q �. �1N$�q.Yffi gQN,�'L'G A y$.�Y' ^a �'[of N q N Ya v•W s L W a� ; Y W M~'y Cy3 /• I �I{g1WEC' ¢�gY M Y q^ V as o yY�tlr NSW Yp� 9^u° a�N 0. Yac�Mt o �� ^� °Wfg a:yy$:mg�~� �r32 . ¢nn^. rt°pp. q�u"NI Y•i`•'M' 'S '�.�.�'$. NYC co y�vW C yCPVI � tl.� � qQN `G:Y C1. bWGw �y as v��""�8'bi $.. <.aq MW'.: C oaf r z-- •. y��ra..^td u;q �R ��Y¢ W�MN Li.tYY @.L'W$ia C N P) I� pp pp B8 p e WO.Y yL O .C. �Y^ ^•• W tMY{.� ^Y YY6 N AVl.LC ou aW Pj.. r st i1`' Lp 9eL' OYONY C4.A GAN 71 «•,gip �tl.. E� ��° ai, 4A _ ft Mq fl� 1i r CS pm lv I2 y�r.Y OMM• y:i,4Y �'�..LS t9 Ji� w�3 �..p�61 =Jf�i�� ���p�.�+ �ii yye V r � R 4��Y11 •" w 1WWkag114iii 13. ' a� W311 l H q ` /. ao e{n1 aL qq V eaa L*•uY�G ■ ccj�qNY a `(be RESSbY O C CYBA'� L yy 1 qq 0+1 qqq yy y y f^ N.L 6 0 �N � Y Ow �O �lL1 OI•0.m:�Y C 6�:. C G`�� d y �L Lx.`9N1�� Cut pA *a Q ^ N O y f1 tl N O D CC yy S ,� 'yy Nq O GGY y0 �..a �YuW.j�Nd 00 tlEYY :� p.. p Q L I• M L a Y L y L o Y.M Yu,G 4 : � p N G 'tl V C� .di uMi C : OM LYW }�. MM N.y G�LL YNM OV�.� y C r0 q£TM qfyd."��c �, Y�L'�1 �bppp a' T Q� u ` N cl'g ePn n•'9�i a Y tO+ v{peg a'^c1 _ww y`pp03 L L 6 1 .�2: C'' (�1 a �Vrt 9 Q O to N L g Cy p G A yY C 9 O N.0 L r. m9tgqyy4 ' N.� M YL. S^Q`� Y.d tiV YiV� N,Lyyg4CG CC '4o.S y. .. . ~.�6C aC ( LS. �NO NY �w�Wu{y4,t�ON bb�� �y�6,YC.,+ �•t'� �CC o.O G s g;J5 y_ r+L 'p O_i!d�� NOW JL s, q�y�:.Y •�` �111 N LYE v C y N L 4eY - Cs L: tY �b$ aN, «�M $Q Za��a"t�.���e� ®mv�:� 'S aY a= +W LY i" .+9� 1 + Y�I Y.�t E L L�1GOp:.S O. - G.G.o ��• 1'. cu +Y..Y� �yo'LL'J ~I1,. O�q �y'. �.Ny�1g/�VQ'�N` tlY C$✓�: -9 •{4�40 IDN�i�. C�C �G� .Lo�sL�yy�grq rq j�. C6�@ � 'O e^Q'MyB �. L y y� o F I Q+ s[Y.o wy. �W Y �.�N Y N L W Q N q 6^ 9+9�A � '1`•O gwC1{y Ip �� .5�O's 1N L b ®M b c y y . NAM .4CN� f. .. 9N0 WMa KN Y��oli UZ Ok�. H+ S• S,y Gyp .':sS� >yo�®g y� ^."'C • i` 1gq` YCIC� 4ea C i�` �fly®may^ � .wgg MScc 8Q V ..y • d�Yl( OL�p �1Ay4®10 YN ..`q �} -. Y V N Ji M ®N SW :6�i• jib ® a "yy M RR�1 �• s Y Y A +" fig+ 1$�g � , •�'fi 24 p' $3 � p 4 �.a LAhW ®.fYV - Aze �g3pp� sa 99� 6ffiM� i �Y N6d�Y _y V ^. A tl�g$$' Y` Ap, �LYg1� YI" ��1A�p9 sM�y��Wgy 6®tl t, Ktl �Ctl 'i!1 KCi SN Pm 6f,! �7O..Mwe L9 Tk ....W i. M Nuo ® e N ^• \ N V t ;N � 1 ++A� $ ro 111JJJEA � �s. �qq��� 4^'ryV pO� �yq�y."�L • `O� 'a tl: .21 V ^1 vA 9�.0 TC 6.r�Yj..�iC y}0� Y 1i N4: .MO 6U. O ,yH yO+ r O®}I .. SGiYq O,Ty �gj�.iY+4 AYH W OC V�aaA gppx'pYsIS ~OG Mu+ ^A !00'rrH Z sQY +yl�Y O O4. .3t- 0 co +H.LOpiy g, to L'b.O r '4" � -K N' Vh a.'g Sy t '" .+ "'V s4 �' .� L•Pi ..e ��.i has �mOO � S$.. u� �$•}�op6°C�o •�/W1 N l�Yrii-- as m s! , w..p 2$$ .° a�p a's a e}w��:- yi�� o e 6q g+ yyH .•c�c. Y r� S .��ybae y +� V«� ,. ES it ei p yyy± _p�p® �y ' 14 'fit u 1, , H I , site �P = 13 pal p ~E i _ .11 m�a + M Y N® 24.. `.rs L r y, `q a �'®�� $ �.•�,�� b.�� �.$ Ate: ~$ � a.�, Mist lei" ta g IN 211 N �f � R I A f� CyWvn $� 4QI acCe/Ib �P� $' « .o® y Q t w. v1 "f N g N�q gCaa Yy �LC'�L. w .�I 44 N •. ^ �y, q�I CC:■�lYq^' �H'!TI � ��• W tlC U « • C]�6�N. Nyq*y I'1 G _§ . og C fC3 1O.o� "mo•.�ro�� aS a� .t �.• $,� � .rF • ,- ,1.�� li, m".. � ;�N� oN f^6S�' �. <.`« S J `� e V LNL� H� '2 u 'w.a � ' .is.ii'�11y pp� GGGdss^ ,. « + �p��� o CL. yy r yL (py� 1'6 IY� ,q .Y e�y+1 ar it 6, N� � ■ Y g.Y llY �N�•! N`��LN�{iN� �� ,`Ni/ �:� Y�. 1•.`: b � p� N NN�4 �=II tw ,� - vc: .3 « • m \1 Mary MA C.M W ��q y1M .OY ib 4m� 60U�V'CI�IM �J qqoN ,"6r� I �{yV1_� ♦t.TG iY r_6 +y' r-4s is id 3� @ pGy. GNYM m tl101tV Be/ O«ga Olw +1+s\p\G: � _� �r. NNop �(y�AY e�• iM.C.Y as -A gigs 7�slo '.. ® � � �..• « •Nmiae •�. fr~_ff�s{ ON' ; �ag, � y°®. say p,. ' - a. :Y •rt � s w � g io Si $ll Stu M ru •e mo " 9i flu 1 gaI AS all oea i L ti v }Zu! a���Gyy .y Q�.. O �p �.+ j.w0� L a iL N CG x U V p� O p OtOJ.�w LC', yG^xY Nam.. � C Qallo L4L.. Vy_ _C rix«a. -NV .�C C.', 4 La ce y cp CY `s` �IIT Y gYL.i $ �y a°Nt ce 24 pEaavp�' } "!'®"ap!' xyyc �Q.. a "-a- l�� LS'� n1c YG i�G �'�� 6 r4�4v,L q4 � wS L Cr`. C .` % co 15 IF cuaL �J N_ 2r� c sae3sa aa LCO LLwty ti NY. (L. cY N E^C4f ��tJae V`NQ�.Y g1`yKYpyypY �IOY.Y.► Nv6Ya.Y �V 'w 1iIr N L .0 it .0. ci a a 1i pppyN��appj ''�s[[ NM' �_ p e g _ g g p41 :5 gg R Y =iffi� Ian I . cps d ix Its L q q 66 aaa$$44 m YY q Y qeo _ »p 6 � 171 = L�O. v c U tip O `.R. `Y� 3 3aa —g S cw�4 ..: VYq tl9w _ V �Vpp�9. 00 O v ,+—••tea \ w 4yw� N ef. 2y 0'q �py .. {'�g4 • .� N M- e -saa `pR gL tltltl� yyyCp4 O4'��! IGqq+�44�w ^O My{ • ' t�A44 Y M O L v Y OIL Na �• r �� a• a.2o l- $ $ maz 'F $ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Y DATE: iecember 3, 1989 TO: Chairman and umbers of the. Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Bruce Abbott, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 89-05 - FOOD e development of a , square foot drive-thru fast food restaurant on .26 acres within the 7.8 acre Alta Lana Country Village Shopping Center in the Neighboftod Commercial D.istriet, located at the northeast corner of Carnelian Avenue. acid Base Line Road - APN: 202-38144 through 26 28 through 33, 35, and 36. I. PROJECT AW SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Re ueesteedd: Approval of conceptual building elevations,.- site pan, g�ra�ing plan, landscape plan, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. r B. Surrounding Land tise and Zoning:` i� North - Existing residential; Medium Density Re!- dential (8- la dp,'eAling units per acre) South Exislting office building; Office/Professional (OP) East - Hi,gh'School; Lore Density Residential (24 dwelling,, ., units per acre) West Existt�ig residential; Low Density Residential (2-4 dxe71ing units per acre) C. &eneral .Plan Designations: Project Site - Nei.ghbbrl"d Commercial North' Medium Density-Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) South - Office East - Publi'c Facility (High School) West - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units,per acre) D. Site Characteristics: The shopping center in which the subjct property is I oca a is developed with approximately 86 OQO square feet of commercial; retail area. Street improvements, parking, and landscaping are also existing. t ITEM J PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT � RE: OR 89-05 - FOOD SERVICE MANAGEMENT December 13,_1989 Page 2, w E. Parking Calculations: (Existing shopping ;center. ZIciuding approve pied uses Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Foota" Ratio=�a_ Required.. Provided. , Retail/Office 88,631 1/250 354 Restaurant 2,400 1/10.0 24 Fasi Food 2,559 1/75 34 Proposed Fast Food 2 537, 1/75 34 II . ANALYSIS: A. General: The existing shopping center was constructed prior to incorporation. A Conditional Use Permit for the center (CUP 84.34) was approved wj the Planninr,,t6mnissioh in Novenber of 1984, and was issued a one-year tik,,g tension in, November of 1986 That approval included a r4 lding pad,, updating architectural treatment and style of existing buildings, /JI additional landscbcking_, pedestrian convenience areas and upgraded` drive approaches and eI iy statements. A modification to this Conditiona:lllse Permit for a redesign of the -store fronts to a post-modern architectural style--was approved on April 27, 198Y, Th s approval also includes the proposed building `.:fad for the 'subject fast food drive-thru restaurant. It was determined at that time that, the architecture for the proposed fast food restaurant would be. approved through a separate development review application.; The a'rchitectural design,of the proposed restaurant emulates the facade of the proposed architectural rehabilitation of the center. The proposed site plan and architecture are consistent with plans approved thriougtr.the 'Conditional Use Permit for the center. Also., the, site plan and architecture are consistent with the Interim Design Goals and Policies for businesses with drive-thin facilities. B. Design Review Committee: The Design Niview Committee (Chitiea, . To stoy, Coleman) first reviewed the project on July 6, 1989 and recommended modifications. The Committee ` (Ch'itea, Blakesley, Coleman) reviewed revised plans on October 5, 1989 and requested additional changes to enhance the design. The Committee (Chitiea, Weinberger and Coleman) give final 'revi._1w of the pianiYon October 19, 1989 and recommended .approval of the project subject to the plans being reviewed %y staff with the following revisions: r� 'r c� PLANNIM CaT41$SION STAFF REPORT RE: DR' 89-05 - FOOD SERVICE MANAGEMENT December 13, 1989 Page 3 1. The raised planter at the base of the to►0 do the east elevation should incorporate a trellis of the same material and color as the patio lattice. Z. An alternative to the raised planter with a 3-foot walk at the: base and 3 compact parking spaces would be 6-inch vine pockets with a A-fnot walk. The alternative should ,only be used if the walk around the planter is fob-wheelchair access. 3. The green accent and roof color should emulate the green color of a weathered coopar roof'. Sample colors shall'be reviewed' in the field for a final r.ol or sel sell orr. 4. Vine pockets should be located at the base of each column of the patio aK:�,r and .vines should ,be incorporated at the drive-thru arbor. S. The proposed concrete tables and benches should be grey. 'Trash containers should match the finish and color of the tables and benches. 5. Pedestrian walk "enriched paving"' should match the enriched paving at the shopping center parking lot entrances. Revised plans and additional information addressing the foregoing comments have'been submitted and reviewed by staff' and are incorporated within the plans or conditions of approval. C. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee has reviewed a pro ec an etermined that with the recommended conditions of approval, the project is consistent with applicable standards and ordinances. U. FACTS FOR FINDItwsS. This project is consistent with�i f eve opmen a an Ire General plan. The proposed use, buiiding�,, design and site plan, together with the .recommended conditions of approval, are in-:compliance,-with all applicable City standards. In addition, the property will :not be detrimental to the adjacent properties or cause adverse environmental impacts. IV. REC"ENDATIOM: Starr rec.ominends issuance of a Negat ve`�' 6 clar'a o�3 n an-a approval of Development Review 84-05 subd'ect.�. conditions as listed,in the attached 'Resolutign.of Approval PPP : PLANI�I CJHISSION ST'r` REPORT I, RE: ' DR.89-05 + FOOD SkRVICE,=t�1AWEMEN1 f December 13, 1989 A bage 4 ;% Jl ; aespetlly sG tted, ,f , Brad er ' City P nner BB:BA:ko �- Attachments: Exhibit "A`". Location Map Exhi « bit g Site Plan Exllblt O„' Floor"Plall Exhibit "D" - Ax6nometric', ky` Exhibit` "E" - Bui`Wing,tlevatims'' Exhibit "F" Gradinr- Plan`. Exhibit "Glf"" Landscape Plan Resolution of,-Apprevhl `with,sonditiont tt 1; f: r f �l: r , _ 5' ~"�+ f Sir•i r .ii�.,-:.i � �' � � k � Z.,�f�y�•��ry•J+�: ���--�- � :°�" JJ(Jyy i� fit,, �- �.. �. � 1J 7 f" •�� s �� ° '� y � jftj--ice• "ice p ' � S'`x.••°� � Mr — k. k; 7 c in Oil v PTr IR IN 4 € , Ilk oil I ; .�m[Qe 10 > A Z' X X � X 9Sx C41h7SEq �.� ARBOR (! RESTAURANT T6TlLARE 2137iO.rr, = tx�arwaitato Kaal: , 1•• 1 x , PAAfS(P1GiC=OUtRCD•96 i.; (' PAfpiC46'BrZpRJ1�PD�34 ®i �N Tp*w, t ` iem0Wtr, Aj �i �ESsGNA "X 1. E a1. X X X X I ♦ y y.. 1:1 S, �ti O0glnall' Four ags i1�VYj'V alOrrop wooer" o .� - ! 7qua3s Y3indwga mM1t�aLN7YVT ®,AgJy a ! a t� It � 1 Its �s !, E F i u A�a1,hy Y? li V x!� t7 Sm 4�k z, ,x. i I® O or. r ��oll a v s ® - mm a s a s „ s 1 am y ® A r w ..... t-Mlow ' G_AWLvm a, Jt tt tis Z J, f All,Ie e91: •°.ed to of so 51— t MYr� v�A � , • � � ,� } � �� � lam' ° . z, r T. ., "ism— TVA:: -ilk rn fi 5cy 1 C� {� ' �f tL ..7 _ .. '1 RESOLUTION NO. ` I A RESOLUTION OF THE 'CHO CUCAMONGA PL..AxxlNG COt�iISSIDN APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEar NO, 89=05, LDCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF CARNELIAN AVENUE AM) BAST~ LINE'ROM IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD 04MMIAL DISTRICT - APN- 2?Z-381- 24 THROUGH: 26, 28 'THROUGH 33, 35, AND, 36,, Alin MAKING FINDINGS Iti SUPPORT TRIM OF A, Recitalt* Food Service Management has .filed on apalic�tion for the approval of Develnpment Review No: 89-05 as described in the tine of this ` Resolution. Hereinafter in this Ro)olu'tion, the stibject Development 'Review, request referred to as "the applid-11 on". (ii} On the 13th of December; 1989' the Planning Commission of the City,of Rancho CucarritV& conducted.a meeting an the application An'd co ncIuded said meeting on that date. (iii) Al I legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. S. Resolution. NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and`resolved oar the w Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucarmanga as'follows L This Commission hereby specifically finds that.al,'! of,_the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A,of this Res Ntion a`rie true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission ' curing the above-referenced meeting, on Cec4ober 1% .1989, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as fojlows: (a) The appligatiotr applies to prop 0ty located at the ter. northeast Corner of Carnelian Avenuo. and Base Line Road with a street frontage of 7M-- feet and of depth of 33C? feet. znd is pMsently 'i�r4.._ d with a shopping Center, and (b) The p;-=t?rty to t#,�, nortll'af the sUbleet sit4:1is tm!Iti-. family residential, tr.- 'property t6 'the„south of ,that site consists of offices, the property to the east is a ht h school, and the property ,to the west is sirgle family residential: anal (Cl The existing'-°6—,ging center, together rtith the proposed application, will ,provide 454< „_�Fnal spaces; whereas, 446 spaces are required; and �; a, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION RE: OR 89-05'- FOOD SERVICE MANAGEMENT December 13, 1989 Page (d) The, application camp lies with the Interim Design GoalslPolicies adopted by;Planning. Commission Resolution No, :88-96.� 3. :aased')Jpon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission diring the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth innparagraphs 1 and 2 abode, this Commission hereby finds .,and concludes as`,followss (a) That the proposed project is Vconsistent with the ojectives of the General Plan*, and (b)�',\That thp�propoied use.:is in accord with the obdective' of�r, the, Development C6,4e,and,Ahe purp�ses of the .district in which tWsite is located; and, l (c) That the proposed use is in compliance wic�,ach of the applicable provisions of ther Development Code; a,-,Ji i! (d) That the -propaaJed use, together ''with the cc,'4tions' applicable thereto, will-not be .detrimental to the public health, Sv[ip�v, or " welfare, or materially in3uriohs to properties or improvements" the vicinity• 4. This Commission hereby finds end certifies 'that the p Ject has been reviewed and considered in__dompli.an i41th t(arl alifornia Envirommntal Quality Act of 1970. and, further, this. Commission hereby issues a. Negative Declaration, 5. Based,upon the findings and conclusions "set forth. .n paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Cammiss-ion hereby approves the application subject to each and .every condition set> forth below, arnl In the 'attached; Standard Conditions, attached hereto and'iJncorpotiated herein by -this reference. Planning Division-' 1) That the-prCp45ed Z3Gt foci i2st��3.rt1}w ?=ham-- - - built ie conformance with the conceptual plans as approved by the Planning Commission on December 13, 1989. L 2) 'that approval of this Development Re,,iiew "is w subJect to all applicable conditions of CUP 84-_ ' 'd4 and the Modification to CUP a4- 4. 3) Wise 1?vets measured r at the property, ;line ' shall not exceed the level, of background noise normal Jy found .in the area.' `' J PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION.�NO. 1 �' RE: OR 89-05 - f000 SERVICE MANAGEMENT_ December 13, 1989 Paga 3 4) The premises shall be kept clean,, ark -theme. operator shall make all reasonable efforts to se� that no trash or litter originating,. from the use is deposited on adl ,;ent proper .es, Via, For, drive-thru restaurants or other uses which_. _- :� . typically generate trash or litter, ade4gate trash 'contain- ask daternined by the City Planner; shalt be required.-and employees shall be required daily to pick..up trat4 or, litter :t originating from the site upon 00' site and within 300 feet of i:he peeineler of the property. 5) All graffiti shall be reimved within 72 hours,ld 8) No undesirable`odors 'sha11 be generated on the site. 7) The on-site ,manager of the use shall take whatever steps are dee6ad necessary to assure the orderly conduct of �!mployee;s,, patrons, and visitors on the premises, 8) The green roof color s(lall eq,Air:e the green color—of a weathered, copper roof' and sample colors shall be reviewqld in the field far a final color selection; ' 9) Vines shall be incorporated at i,he base of?each column of the patio arbor and drive-thru arbor. 10) conrreta tables,. benches, and trash containers shad be grey to match 'thej color 'of the 'wilding and shall be patio: 11) Samples ofenriched paying shalt match.enriched paving used in shopping center, parking tot . entrances and shall be reviewed and approved by staff prior to issuarce of any'perrhits. 12) A copy of conditions of approva.� 3 through 7 shall be posted with., the necessary, business licenses and be visible at ail times to employees. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLOTION NO. RE: OP. 89-05 FOOD SERVICE MANAGEMENT December-13, 1989 Page 4 Engineering Divisions 1) All existing drive approaches on Base Line Road and Carnelian_ Avenue shall be reconstructed i;, accordance with City Standard Drawing No. 306. 2) A right turn lanes for the entrances to the southerly drive approach on Carnelian Avenue shall 'be`"nstructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 3) Due to a sight distance problem at the northerly most drive approach on Carnelian.' Avenue, the following items shall be completed: a) Remove one course of block from the 3-foot wall reducing the wall 'height a minimum of 1/2 food for a 16-foot distance as measured from the west end of the wall. b) Place raised yellow non-reflective pavement markers at 1-foot center along, the centerline of the driveway from the right- of-way line, a drab^.nce of 30 feet. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the: adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS.I3TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1989. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY'OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. Ne , arm ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of December, 1989, by the following vote-to-wit: iw7ES: COWISSIONERS- NOES: COMMISSIONER$: ABSENT: COWISSIONERS; J �� uu A 01 C G Si C N OY pQ M4 tip a..i� �� • _y ON Gam.V :6i L. Y G N'.Y Y 4 a:N q nl. T�.V.u}C Mu ■ .O L.O G `Ore .O4Yd V.CJ��:...+. ��yy• p.G pYY�`,a(j NVtl oyfS Y. Oo i^II wTi. C'��6 �Yy•,�s� 'T�YY 1 4y p4��a ■.�tL14� V.a Om CGG gCVCC4 'p^� `C'-':+� Vw `�`oY V a y 6LSVNLryyM QOONQQMoY� P� `E� d it--. PL3u W4 Apb!.µc C.Ue LO,a Y �O� 72p�yd ZZ _•dr' ^V wlf lie! _+� 3. ^N'N' .qU v_> Cow. lV to bK r1��N�YL 9N yCy p�1 _ C��Y Q V0 1�q 88yy till .. --LFY.1=" � i1d Nx ~ W N y Q�� yq }ayOSS�� n �V �y Cp pt3�N LV>•�rt�E•,,' p`O Rcag�ly . tl NO``4+a•V .' L�C pa�YpV /J 'AVa>N�u~ tl•tl. N� O' r�® NY tl1V, `EIV �a.'•^ M Y Cl.f>.II c���Y�/ `�L•' s yy.,i@` Y� N p�p4� @N NwpYfY41r'.i acyNiR}... •� ��VNGG:iN`O 7`:, r�OON mCY.•� lf.Nw. � Oq/�,y F• 4L . /^1 r e yr C Mi `�7- 4tlq M tl` •w �yyYv�� owls •i 44�� tl 96" �b E g$tlf a 4 In F F �� u �Y>> uN yy Y q �1A�I ^ywrl� qr�G Lf�Zut.ipYC ��a L�uSE QO C v /'. f VY O. LO.wN yUY �4 p Y p w y e ap (`e�vyl' G L:ON w w eyyt� N q' 7r..i t�NYy¢SNw ,qa o 9 m_ cd�, up'NL � YY`a' u..Yr tl1 v u .n « mgu "'> C Yq' q�w NY�yqyuoY.r7o Y�}cg�.yp�w �v � .'s•'t..q N. `:o cca 6 oyaaS�'L�a yy np pO ci .�%y� O _9 �a.6b` n 9 Y M v � Y .ate Y.cYY YYp N OL" �GV.N NY 'Y 'Y ..qw oivyy�� � §c Q.s 6 Q..NO 114-i 4 =..; 3pV• YY A.YOY ct�O N y 4'�j C„. �YCw4 YrJ CA T® V.— Y6YwG gMyN V OMy�'G� dam [ IL a q y4 ^S^9 N_j gY yyCN ]~�29 M Sri Y C� '` N L.01 y r^✓r, 9.a= NC YdOM/'� 9N : "9p4: L�.�� �_dC • uL 3ta g�,p6OYL qY80 six, V w Nq � SY=� C w YY C5 O la _'$S oaf ....Z'�`dYJ; ".S �..av$ �0 0 Cl- • gCQ' 1 VY YYY ia� �C' O yyYtr -���M..,, Yam.N.9 fi �.'. b 0 Np O N 0 7 p.. w N re 3 :j w M}. C� 6Ot/C� �4w y■Y���}pypypy Rye �f� Y=CpCNO�M: „p�~r GOPl fi Ql M. �y � ■6L n� 4gO�Y t� a �u g_�� ��Y.e �e ® .'$Q�'C �u�� i N �Y Na.4 O~i.i.Sy Ofy A y o �u _ Cy '.N. rN1 C¢ R.� Y` MN � rY wv p. y Y A L q.O _ y ` Ob y_ C i C.w,g,, L N$ ^Lu 11.Q' cg9- Yqq q ^ yY1LO yy� Y� ~aiE`E. Y� COyNO •.o VM �Y t ® =N QN$O s N$ . oy� _� rip PE _� VS so_ , s8SSSy�� (p"g yyyrt®g�$ ®®� p�� �OrW �sy `a'�i}pap.�N® !'YDQ O Y ��C® ���., N * V �v~ ■+ ®Q6GJi.N qO 41 ;M 53 � �0�. q s Y ., `N @.. L q.4 Y �Q J .-*.a •M•i�' O -2]K Vif i SAa. 1ow `���■ •D ��j. �jO � �a�� . N'^ 4C1a+pt-P 27, L 1r ■■■ GG NSb.. O' Spa L^� fig! N W 'A� y, p Kp qL:y�6M5 Cpp6 .d.rrS ! �S L7eQp q««p qy .VtW: WID `�w + 1Eb p6b��t91 EYp� , vb�Rp{gw$7 Y11.�Yy O Lrjqg6 �>4 a Kr�NY � <i^tlj .�jor7 � 4�weow� N .Y„j �q.E o. 1 CC LL, {p 0)0 000'vCi YCf CILgM pYQY C / � ,� qq Cz f� OiY q� 9`�p0<Y O'_Cin (r N�'q V O• N N_a �C TSt C y L., r �.� L CUz F, F LaC �N W l\ qQ YLdJi K—.2l qwa ^ZIOyO rd' iCY4 F �6611 CC y 6dl m.O 4 C aLyi C CnQ6�C - aLfN�e 'tl ' +ai O U `N °'^CL Y �y! C YNI� ccww a ay� i- Y{p� LL HY Oa Li•.0GG1 q C r� T:OOC �yN GN LLL���Y IS' NN dr. c .gyp VIOL U61 Ct G O�') �..;q00 NMCl.Oq.�b r�d�� a G =WBZy �4 - O'gOYLNp4C0pd vq q Od �.. . 9.2, o ;.Al .3 �.. e.ao5e�q �csn5ys "�' oa � t. � 'd3'.�w" $e're'ja.4L. c� 'ev�e5 y...� NOG � -.L l CNdb �u O! MT. � O K §VL V IL Za�L� pA�{H{�fO d a�OF q§N.p� 03 G a ` ` VD �f Vq 640' uNy YGrW Npf GV r .G 1C�" -GN ZQc WV VV....— aY.B V z WLYq Y C'NY C{{�� Led Y 6 N Oy tL�{Lt 4^ �YpO�1 21 i AVC w�iw y L~LL ■.Nl� QYYK ��N r� - CpOC`�p5�J�.YLY r{CO Uyy1` rO ®GLpp� 9 CYL�Cn`,N�.N4M �.N� 6N 9Ni1 INNS .4N Y��QIi O9rN pi �444 AM ! qq y U Lq" 4 G 00 .5 'a .L Y'uS s_C�G Yr'a� Z.;P GVp iaN�� �Nee N0:7q y MS Y a� LYY 4qq4 Q�p S . t �O'L r,d CL�Vqti •Cry a ` N 'OJ( Y V O.y n.� O.O!` Yr a�'�o O9y� V�.YC CaC� M'. ' V CqL yEq y+§'.�NYYY 06C� ►L.g���,P C V ra S1L Gb Z. ilCSma R L•�Oq �Mp O sTL wg anr�lwgSY . Nrd -p, Y w MJoY Zy wOQ; iC w sir `eas«�� ��®r er."'.�u.,: •� «3L� pP A ': isi a RgC�tly u '4 05,1Y §p am+reZ T4 u'° 'Caoa M Qea y.C�&� .WL 1��w ,..-Yvu, T � �� z.8 wa y5.4 E. Qz. � s .G6�Yn �w�oaigp:9 Zara— Rig Vid^a F —930 #y a.+3l:NY .:-$ o��sc w��q 'e m„Gw,«�.Ai.. y b }ir.. (p� y p y M N_N a ij lLY�tl r A� Y r�Y.�f%!G wsM N.V Y�i N 'V NGMI� L N' �L't�a.N �ONe4.,`.B @.I WC2 to 4..0 i\ O r. pi L O L bl i O AJ aqn 4�0� qq y z Z w Q4 @A ... �y�q � Y .V5� « g +t( c��.6 ww�� �Oc `O"R Y�pb �YyY�•' ,w'�.yh. �y: Ci1'QY I3t/�Y13Y,ya�t y..9�LY "� F`M f .� +^ yp$jp G ` {Nq lrN l�r'�4Ly Cy6 w y4}' .. TZ ,qy yypyOyyyy C...+� �w C� �". ba�a YN�:Ir4 1D.NMN T J N YAr b..M��Y1g Jam. M1y� C. q�b�'a hs.L • �9 C M^ at c.a.. :e.c> :°"s'o c`4', Y�D � �`,«� w+a''.u v■.'°a,,$�' Y _L' �"' YQF Y:ae agcuY py wri$eii� Y��� Z , o Artq L/ corn� o"�'+�.¢wY'ra� yNc..u$qV�Y N4Nw'yYi y w4Ya Y{, :�,,H�A�.M3QsV•` C4c• "uqqp`tat+r�+i,w MY'"w Ayyw,Y�„14' a �j b _ Y m If. �MC' �{q0^ a ' 13 U Y« vi �'j* Yyp��w's' }��I!w� }qy� �jjj�� qy/ y$$�� HA gq it— Hy C L„cLY pG$ .EGA fYY..S yM mt ll, 'r9� YYYVYrrrr p S {0 . G4i.6. N 4gwuQ p NLi1 ytlyyf J I=Y_ Na L� �q O iyC 4S J?Ya ,� Ile a t 4 w�Mq p~ :AeC� j �'.pq g� yEYw O t9 0 ..e G A +�i "� d+M ZA NY r\1 • r _ t C2 bY°.° q Vaua p5".r>yY t d, Cesi. L6 M n 88 S Q i pYgi C S i eza lei 3 �..'n °~tq¢ '.0,w as Vyp g y Ny AL fi �C -. ^�4 pP O^qs C V�k1ni � wp N4p 4yyy 6i ± M K �..b Yq m�O+y[R� M S�ppR..4 -.4" AR �aB �b,� ii Q$j � I�QiAi C". fgl yNGY uy$ �N Y @Y0G ulR�¢i OiN 4�''�ry3, a-1 IL�q YQ sl��7pq®y�. � .:D"' O p 'ti IL .���: ��✓YV r4 .rdioa ;�rd��.frgN:J .'a��Lj} u c c c MLa c: u �Nuy L OL�ga ^r Y C Y � Y , y= 9 C L ^� qOT4 � d O ��LO lSCd S� O d LO$. VC l�Vq `r/ u$ �'oYe a ��H .r5" d� ,., d _cam, ''•e 0 a KOT^�g CC CC CC Y a 9yy P tl w�.. � N a d W� y1 CC`^ E.1L^V y U ^C O A O =A V YO u.1 ytw L q^ rA d y p N~d L Y L V o y C. s `da.2 - " oW � Di AS ... ,. 5 Aft y I I I i 1 4S ae c d w e m ua os o3 cod eu osg.�i_ �.. �ltp,�l�oo o qp ••Nr L VC !� CLWO y�(Ya/�J 'pyL � g9 'CNY $`� ry�p •Otli �. 1r d Y...:p C. p �M N L des dG. Oa 4� ~Y E•� V� ��m■ ®T� O � p� 00d� dO��Y Go 79 Le +9 M- ,,,�ItO qq. 6 L^d S. U.S. U.Y .. W W O M a ;• �� �E® N p Y Y® �y' _Q N" Qw�p• y��Muq � � y IT Hai 111111111 !i O. VVV p'YYY !6di O ffi.Q "3v a :e�� 'e�$ 'w ��.yxy� �d `' :y�p"p►us� '��q$y � � _..,N� �V :gym �r3n �s�.N.�.g� W Itl U.V V i ugq yuy H"' cj VC .G N ST �+ NCy�: o CCcy,. a � � 'o�� yd•� '.�,-tr �"� •rOi CL.� ±ti'.. W�r as �C H'Na �6pp Gyby Q z N V<C.® $ 4 w o C V N G CCC 7 qC L' p�N 1,.. ON,[CN_ N Y, wo W C IIC 0 - IV _ 0. e��� oLa .9 camga °' . as a �rJ uy�.Y�L�., qC _ w, qY O.O ar LO 64• qr _CN O 4 W Oc /q�... 0 1 ow LV :`qQy q� �vyisV Co 4 e N'! aC OL CyyL. �_'W. aWV.6 ppLI �yC ■L 6 A^1.0��` '�W V� Cb C$"�..V N C M 4 O u,a, yT O Y Oa �N d.. V O Q4pp pp Li '11�.l y U _ 06��` V: y=ii N.4Y MnW �UY 60W N3Y M i`w$' .q .. V �p lit(41 .A ��y-ti1L Ly� � �Y N®t�a�..Y �pJy� Cp�� LL�^ rL � oy yyyd� `v CC �YY(� •�ri 41O55.W1-NeeY \� I of ta- as Q N p L N u A �o B p a mw Ls M G� L� r_L NM O_ i'f O. o w t at F I 3m :g g'9 as p gtli�da' m°{o N �'as �H cP �wq $3e 6 r �;`� e�g. R �c'.-. 46 g 2.d '. 1^�yy J �aq �,, V�dyyyb OE Y NCp.� Yi pg+ 0 too'. Y .'� p V iN H N®hl 6�J� WO I I �I I I6 �� t t op _6-5 ^�O i7 a r o'La C '.O a'a 66 qy uy Ljj Y a Y D O l J N 5 cu w L49t O Q g N^.:N N ap'.L.ci n y L GYO tsYw� L CrN N � � N'. C� qqYY Cyq. �4gV 60 60Y � Cq GO• yp a M 910L. a^ etd SSe �t O tf Yy a O'y �.3^� : L' p,, :y Flea. eva •.�� QN •�� f w Y O + �. �22 ggS 60• �S cc sv L y t9a cp'N r® S cri ,'i 0 y•. LO Sp A. ft a tYyYy�ij `u �-✓s pp✓��p ®YO is `ram �M s�..� 0��� �� L qy is yyy V O G � f�pp Syg it �G �®y �b id NYiI P �q M OSA iwy �g� . VrB N gtYo = Y H YY• M -p-all �., (yam Lbq � 0♦� On® Hyk r.. �w C Y .: ✓ M l'N :r O O O t w a Yy Yq yp Us- co Yi �3SO _ 6wpg6Ws oa e` qq� baTVN I.� qpL� i LN a tl �j� 6 a`sw VYq� MpbP.p®.: N Y.� 4.3 s.b (^9. 17 9 r Y V q �+ N +a py� p Y q o L o <W '.bN� ,.F7 Y .•<Q. Bslb H01► F.N� w N r B Mr f I ! _ .1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM �r Y Date: December ,6, 1989 To: Chairman and Planning Commission From: ,Joe Schultz, ccimunity Services Manager. Subject: Ri ulcho 'Cucwaonga Sports Complex �a BACK�RbIII�17• In February, 19b9,' -the "Re.deval.opment Agency approved the purchase of`approximately;19.2 acres of land on the west side of Rochester Avenue between r%oothill Boulevard inu,'_ Arrow Highway for the developu ent (it a Sports Park C0Mple ... In June, 1989, the Agency approved. the acquisition ':oi an additional 9.6 acres.of 'property; and in October 1989, 6 . acres of property. The last acquisition_ brings the; total acreage of the Sports Park'Complex to 3s .acres. In additionto a Sports ComSplax an animal control facility will also be planned with the complex. On October 4th, 1989 the architectural firm of Orillias, Piro, Rosier, ATLVES (G.PR.A.)'- was "selected to design the sports complex. Our anticipated construction completion is Spring 1991. ' As part of the design of the Sports Park Complex, City Council requites. that one of tzhe baseball f1.slds b6 designed as a 3,504 seat stadium suitable for profel�8ional baseball.. Two, T consultantea were hired to help' des�' the stadium suitable for C'3.�AiSS A .major league play.;'�C Alit 'depth 04. prOfessional sports organizations hae been .ixtreamely helptal. and has added;perspective to the project._ These are a number of benefits to the `'ity which may 'result from the preawl0a of a minor league tea,'a. These benefits can be summarized as follows: e. Continued` development of in®upensive, family-- oriented entertainment for the citizens of the City. Daily exposure -of the Cityds name in the national sportz news media. e. An afttd',dimaansiion in coinmufti.ty, `ideritity. c: s An add"%ijional marketing tool. 4 r o New revenue souice for the City general fund,' both from direct and indirect activities., o potential VvN capture additic:nal revenue for the City by installinq_other Spol-ts related commercial uses, such as batt4�g cages. o Creation of approximately l0o ri`sra jobs related to J the team/field management. L ?beyond the communityr-aide benefits identified aboc'e, there are. direct,,;benefits ,ta the local Splorts; organizations as well. These include. »' o accessibility of,professional-level baseball play, The ability to 'observes professional-level, play is strong. • motivafiion for, young ;..r eople to o participate in' local sports ,programs;, . and. for tnose al::wady ,involved to continue. o Accessibility td' a profeaolional, rade ;i - 9 Playing flay. for senior Read colleagn 1etiIal todrnament Play. Because the minor lezigtp p?a�yi"q schedule only reguires approximate y �Ei :h6,' gaziiM in.. the five months from April thraugka Aug st, it waulfd be possible td schec t�'e, the t&UrAa*,,ent play a:xibund the minor lesgae vge.` o Community/team involy®mend l.aeal prafess�i�anal sports organizations place rt, 2\.igh value`' community'" involvem'sni» `xhes .tivities. include: drugabuse can prevention. pz�:'gra�as, :,+ports camps, stay-in-school: pragramPf and athar posti;CiY anotivation prograams -or you:qr pe:capl+e» A'��r.�csas• This site of approximately 3, acres has. hec;s tie'a�igned, to accommodate a presmi®r CLUS .A prof®saaiona�l b� aeb tll tad.. t t:rays (3) dealcatei7lighted softball, fields, tN%? (Z)Nighted saccer fields, a small �patk, and the •City�s animal lc��trol shelter. These facilities will relisv>e the tre endqua dsmand Ear spo.«.t N playing fields that the City currently is 6xp0rZGnc;tng at neighborhood parks. =-rhe site was select SA so Ughted facilities will not impact residents» ` `,- »{4 it r5~ Disc�"ssian itsaS for tl:p gianniig Ccmanission arm: © orientation=of fac,��lities 0 3o nt urge ,p&rkinr with adjacent 1�t:,3 crwnaxa in this .industrial ai-ea. Compact patkinq 4paces. Design concepts:. O Architectural tt@G31 ulaYY/T;ae Of Materials, a- Height of ballZield stadium lights. R COMMEND}1'iTOU: ?1 Approve the, conceptual design"of fiha Sports: Park, Cqmlolox. Respectfully submitted: joej Schultz Community Ser;jf. as Ma!,nager JS':t' t_ I , 7rRJM ---D-ES1GNGRQUPq INC*. r� PLANNING A D T.AilETSCAFE Rlt#HHITI�CTURE R�Nmo cummONGA;SPD?,2TS compi= r December 33, 1989 VA _NG TABNLAT109 PARK, PROVIDED, E Parking Standak„d Stalls standard Stalls Total Lot tto. (modified) with bom-paot CumpaGt + 77E = 205 "(28-W) 2 399, 349 + 57 406 (14 ) 3 107 B6 + 25 = :111 (22M) 4 131 110 + 15 = 133 (1.11%):. 5 232 10.9 4. 4.5 `234 (19$) TOTALS 1154 952 + 227 = 1179 (19;), Q ERFWW PARKIU(; Park 100 Typical Balifield ;1:36 (x 3 fields'= 408) �4 Total, 236 * See attached exh..,oit B V� BARKING F21EOUIREG;L(Per`Robert Kalill and Associate report dated ll-29-89) Softball @ 3 fields wztht tournament play -. 322 Stadium @ 1. stall/3 seats w :h 3500 CAP = 1170 stadium @ stail/4 seats with 3500 CAP,,= fs75 1492 (1197) r J „277 3 F:AS ItAMBLAS,SU#+ 25, B11S+5$dDAt VgEdQ. A'9269 (7i4)SS2-fi516 a Pk7C�7241.5O 429 +' r RANCHO MICA3i0NCh:SPORTS COMPLEX _ C December 13,.._1989' r _ Page 2 NOTES: - ; . I.Limit peak harking demand ;through operatlo3�`al control. k 2. 'Sobcer parking demand"is during'a•4ifferent '`s 'aso th iri' baseball., ,, Typical stadium-.attendance is approximately 1250 ("per Roy Englebrecht) redZ:ig parking requirement to Qi16 a 1 tp 3.. Extension to 5000,seat,stadium would potent, Jly req J,it: joint use parking agreement with surrounding land;;ovmers", ,.parking structure ' or additional land purchase Softball - 3 fields.,with 'tournaz :nt play = 322 Stadium @ 1 'stall/3 seats`with-5000`:CAS`. 1661 Sta /,4 dium 1 stall seats with `5000 yCAF l f 1''50 j( z 1989 (1572)' Ih Q1. V ,1 - I t-- e�� SL 3 .+� �`• � ki`� air. r t` �lr y3Ttst�t!sTa�`f72!f.;Y �d ��� .-� ..... T; .�4 i [•� .pal e7i �or ,— 1 T it, 1 t F-UI591i '�1'C�i7 9 PFE�LIIMI�N fY I PL � N •. . . '' 1 sl CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM Date: December 6, 1989 To: Chairman and Member of the Planning Commission 1(3 From: Joe. Schultz, Community services Manager Subject; Rancho Cucamonga Central dark Library BACP.GRODND: Within the 106 acre Central Park cite a library facility is proposed co be located within the Cmni Centex. The 4nitial design anticipated a library facility of approximately 40,000 Ja. ft. with 250,000 volr�aes. The City has cantered the design development phase of thrt central 'Park projact and .further research shows ihat a central library facility to service the growing needs of the community should be approximately So,000 sq. ft. The City has investigated saveral options of how to fund the library facility. ReceiNtly, the state passed legislation which authorized 31C0 41illirn in funds be made for the development of library fatlilitias throughout the State. This money would be made avail"le tl� ough a g:c;.nt process where- by-the Stator would fund a)5% of the facility and the local agency would fund the remaining 35%. Th-0 Citl Courncil has recently directed staff' to pursue tr: State gA'aht by submitting the necessary letter of in January and submitting the application and plstis in June so that it can receive positive consideration. A 1RZY�fsr . At the present time the State Librarian has not fully developed the criteria for which the grant V nds ;will be allocated. 8awever, discussions between the, Str„e librarian and the City"s architect :fcr the projrt have indicated that those applications which show the most prcgress, as well as- a strong need for :library facilities, will receive the greatest consideration Staff has developed a schedule 'which,will allow tho City to submit the most complete and favorable ,packsga based on the information that we know to date. To, ascomptish the goal, of receiving the State grant, it is asue9ntial that the planning Commiss,on play a key, role in the. design deavolo�pment phase .of the Cezillral Library racil;ity. �M ITEM L Rancho Cucamonga Central Park Library December 6, 1999 .A_ Page Two t` 'a Analvsis (conetl - Becauee of, the"=need t) submit plans for-the Pacilit Y lsr "J'urie - I of 1990; staff had deiral-oped a tko phased appr©acn t,9. this. Project'.' Tice airst plivse will consist of deveiop;tng a floor: plan and a cF�nceptuai a� Aitectural 6 t'sigz for,t ie library. ` The second phal's ;,will °'cansyat of developing 'tine; final'. axc11:!mctural dasign, Zir a3, landscape ard,.grading 101ans and „ . other el6me,,; s that atb, t pally ;found in final t ui�mittala to the Planning Commjssion '.for their rev3eV and approval. t (see attache4 schedulRe/)' It is important that the library ba..ptocasaed• in, this manner so tho'_71 whore making apPlYcitiar to the State they' widet8tand that the :project has 'the' support fro*,, then, c0mmunit7. : By, processing' 'a detailiji vlobr plan - with. , cC ncept:ial architectural: design, .a px"elimiiiary goat estimat$ ,can also ae submitted to the ;StAU_ as part cf. the grant 'application r Once ,ibmitt ] s' fade to."tie- State, .and duringl.)h Ioii xeview of toe project, stata, ekpicts'. the Council to direct, "ths ar'aAiterh to co�apleta tree::`�aork3,ig drag qa for,. Lhe proj,act as parr of this,. `.he, fir al architectural, 1,n.1.P�� and graCt.itg designs, w;iich will iba submitted to the pianaai zr� commiasiv for final review and ap�iroval> A lib;�JaL y suhcon�;tt's 'has been .aCormed, r.�t" iah incillass a ; ianresentativa, from a "P1axs�siz�g smmssion, �g®tsy �Jeinloeiyg $, as well as membel9s ..from,r ether ComBisions ,Council and the pi, , c VOW that the txsk has bean:defined' and pxr+liminar+y pros`x i=jAg of ate ,fadil icy . has' seen aonp�eteci, staf: pia pxegsared A schd4iae`o.utlin;nq the najar dates and me$tingo which'iaould'�+t�-`,n�cassary to "meet :� �7une submittal date ;td the Stit`.e. 'S RaCO7DAR¢Y13 • Approve the processing schedule for the Ranc ho : CUCM1 r ` Central Park :uabrary. C JSstp h.z yt(l L1 F DESIQNGROUR� INC. ' MANNING A,`.:9 1.A I*CAe r. 9C151TECTURE. RANCHO,GUCAMO1VC'A CENT:tAi. PARK � TENTATIVE MEETING., HE D. ULE , Thursday November ici. 1989 Initiall',programming Sufi-coa'' ittee j meetings. Friday December 1.:1989 aresource documentation&site analysis update Staff meeting. Thursdav December 14. 089 Review and approve space' planning/programming components and relati o nships. Sun=coMmittee meeting. NOT E: City to prepare.Letter U Intent fo-, State Library Grant Application. Wednesday December`7, 19$9 Request desip review foiE library ` arcriitzctural concept. Thursday January 4, 1990 Progress r6viewr of schematic Esigns AVAI basidonal,provedpragram.Stib-rommittee meetings._ ., Tharsdav January 11, 1990 Review anc approvesch.entz is designs. Sub-CUMUCOeo meetings' ' Thursday Jaruan; igr 090{?1 Presentatio�j;o:Nc err —, ns and . t .. progress reui•.wr of O c._...Mary floor plans and elevations. Park and Reczeation .Commiission. Thursday January 25t1990- progress review ofp:celitninatyfiocTplans and elevations.Stabs onmiittee meetings. Thursday February 1,1990 �dc:;i��.r6iew workshrjp for approval,•a£ � liHrax;�;�rchitectural'�:dnce Wednesday Febmarr 74,1990 >f'laiiaang mmission approval of library-. a1 chiteel' t concept. Thursday Febvitlary 15.1990 Pari and Recreation Commission approval of /J libi;ary archiitecttaral concoVt Wednesday. ,.bruary 1.1+9Q0 R.D.A.tpproval of lib architectural 07 f 27433 LA'S 1 XMkAi,SC1nud i �91tbN,r vi= !CA 9201 m (714)S02.1,516 ` FAX(714),010429. i'r pif r v March Leo June 1, Cvmmen? jipparatlon of IS°Ail; bdiiditi'g/corsttuctian documents land 9rtffiC applipution -submittal y pa`cksve, r JiEnel, I9005tate f ihra Grani Applicucian } .i' Pa4S� : This tentattV`e,meetina 5t'iedule is teased pru-na tiv ts�on the library,gmiat gp Nation, eadpne,. E.t is oti� to �ubtiatf prehmtnary 1un1 �f.all, park.}acuities for desigm- ._ rep; and gbtaltr�'approva� b Ji ne 1,1.99(} Ad itiCynal meetings Yvill he scFeduled lir�,ZCj \march Auri and May. - Y 4 �t 1i r° C {k �� .) � w .:A � it i L CITY DF RANCHO MCINOXGA of ST FF 1 �f .7 r. c DATE: December 13, 1989 , TB: Chaff rmdn and.Memoprs•cif- 4� .P?•finning Cflmm9 sSi os►ti, ' FROM: Brad Buller, Cites Planner BY: Nancy Fong,'Senior Planner SUBJECT: THE PROPOSALTO ` ESTABLISH T)E5,IGN POLICIES,,--a R .'RING- ADDITIONAL c'XTQEIE INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS WITHIN Pit:: INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC 11 61Z A1'U`TidE I. BACKGROUND: At the cast meeting, .the Commission reviewed the propose esign policies :arsd made several suggestions for refinement: Attached for your rev eal is the revised- Resolution ' establishkng,l such,design policies.,. (CheAges are shown`in bold],. Once the Conimfssiton adopts the polities, they, will bew effective immediatgly staff wll ensure that;the adapted policies are suede available to the p6l,ie as 'A,:,han�j-out at.the counter, ; Staff has already �$egun to du `inform appiicanwof industrial p'r'ojgcts which are fin process of the up-carving design palicie5. that will affect them: ?:;'' REC SiENOA€i0li: : Stags'recommends that' she° Planning Comtission . review a r'eVTted design po!Ao-ies* If the towission concurs with them; thee adoptf,o�Z��7 he attached Resolution would be in order.: Res ly ]Witted, BBra le ,1 P -i ty ann r z, BB•NF;ka Attachments- Resolution of Approvail'. Establishing Design Policies i 4 bs 711TEbi M n S r• RESOLUTION NO. Ajt RESOLUTION OF THE'PLANNING COMMISSION Or THE CITY O F" , R11k,10 CUCAMONGA- ESTABLISHING_ DESIGN GOLICIES FOR 19DJST9IAL 'BUILDINGS, REQUIRING';ARCHITECTURAL TREATMXNT AND" CREATIVE USE GF, ALTERNATIVE BUILDING MATERIALS_WITHIN ._ `THE,INDUSTRAL �PCIf"iG PLAT! FiREA - - 'WHEREAS, "the Manning Commission has e�Ippressed design. concerns wi.th�, painted tilt-up concrete industrial Naildings, l as they,lack'variety,. 'have inadequate architecturl treatment, increase maintenance, and create dated building: design and previous projects'have not a quately addressed the design concerns; and WHEREAS, there is a need to establish adesign goal to guide future development; and WHEREAS, "design policies are necessary to"' pound and implement the established urban design guidelines and standards 'of the Industrial Specific Plan;and WHEREAS, such design policies are needed to,,proride clear 'direction and guidance to developers and .staff alike. t NOW, THEREi ORE, BE IT, RES4LVE0, iirat the..Rancho.CLc unga"'PIarmifig Coswnissiota does . hereby establfsh design polfcfes ,.fori ;the additizrial architectural treatment and creative case of Oterre l*4, buil di ng matef ibs as follows: SECTION I. Goal t3tatement The 'inter,`t of the design policies 3s to assSst the designer in understanding, and co plying with"Oi urban design Guidelines and StandaMs of the Industrial Specific,-Nan The goal is to>ensfdre high quality and ton' less buftding design, which includes` buiTding. .entty ff:41 point, -:sufficient articdlation to"4uilding plane, dad the creative use of a4ternat$ve buildis.3 materials ether 06n eansrete. These design polici�•`;` Noound' the establis{ied Urban Design Guidelines of the Industrial specific 'Au �i' and, all apply tc all,. industrial buildings within the Specific Plan area, a SECTION 2: DeFign"Criteria f; A. Desirable architecture sk�11 project a high quality, 1 . progressive, sophisticated style.; of development.:�� LL Variations in arclitectsral style, construction methods and materials are encouraged. 77 ., .. En � n 4. PLANNING commrssio!"RESO!UTION M0. QE: ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT Decamber 13, 1989 Page 2' B, All building ahtra'Inces'shall bk,vrell arti cul ated.and project a formal entrance"-.statement thk ough variatioi.s of architfZ,turitl;planes: pavement surface treatment, and landscape'pIaaas, as wet gas.-relate to pedestrians. C. The artiCo:ia`ted building entrances; together with ; the landscapi pla7As, should,oe designed to r lai to and connect• Nifh the,-area-vide,netWorbc of .gpW, space,` thus,, unit icpg and `fostering a sense: l CcMu D. The ,degree of" architectural'.' tmatment " W embellishoents oust relate to tha scare.and, Asa?rl of xhe buildt1g. E. Accent, treatrmenti- such as .-changes ;,tn exterior` materials and 'tertere, is r' ui`red d F. The. -ereative use of;.,aiternative bt,,il;�ing materials. r' Is required,., A minimum'Of tie (Z)"prfloro,cbuildin4 meter als s:isll be ,a�,ed. fie• recoi needed.primary and secondary besilding",�raterials are as fo1 Rcaws: u Pro Mary building Materials - concrete; sane ii;�ted :�,anCTete, texfiuv'ed black, brCk, granite, marble, and similar materialS as '-, approved by the 2edgn-ReVi6N C nIUK�._ o Seconaa W building Materials : - glass, t ie,�l polished brasd or cDpper, brick, concrete, i painted Metal elements, painted 'accent s}ripe,} 4 and others materials as aPpr<>aeri by. ;i ►e i3es� ��� Review Comrottee. APPROVIP APD .!ADOPTED THIS i3TH DAY OF bECEMBER "1989e PLANNING'COMISSIMOF THE CITY 9i< R WtiCAfit3'e A �f BY: arry 'C ai 95 ATTEST., ra i er; cre ary 14 u 1" PLANNIN6.,v"u 4�SSION"RESOLUTION ,NO. = r+,r RE: .AR�HITECTURAI TREAIHENT, L` Deceembi} r Page•"J} I, Brad-1ulier, Sect�et ry.1.of the,Planning Commission ..of the €?�ncitoz: Cucamonga,, do hereby eP ify that the `foreg6,tng Resolra is ,� $uly ;and regularly i.q roduc,d; as,ed, arb aw��tea her Elie PlagtsZng_Ca���� sio� ai the City of Rancho Cucaribn5ia, rs��u�lar. mEeg of the P1. nting`Comissioj� ield on they 1 th dayc"of O -am68t; 198;f;bar"tne'following vo', ,AYES: COMMISIS NERS NOES: C 9ISSIaNEM > ABSENT: rdK,# STONER r f r� s S 4 , i 1 : 1� { + [f r , H ✓ W j CITY OF RFIRICHO CUCAMONGA - DATE: December 13, 1989 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Co;m►ission FROM: Brad BuL1er, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Senior Planner SUIJECT: CONSIO.ERATION OF PJQING ORUGOTORES AND PHARMACIES AS A C NDI _ N ITTED USE sN ;_T E P C AL '.,C AL OI RICT OF TH FOOTH L BOUL v RO SPE JEIC PLAN.. I. ABSTRACT: The propose of ,this report is for' the Planning ro�rmission to review and' discuss the': proposal as dentioned E above. Yf the Cormission con;:t!rs with the findings in the report, then staff should be dire_ted tOL initiate and prepare an aknendeent to the Foothill Bbul,evard Specific-Plan' IL ANALYSIS— A. Bac ground: The developer of T Lomas Winery.-71aza located at the northeast corner of Foothill and. Vineyati-Avenues recently informed staff of a potential tenant, Gemmel Fharmacy., who,,'is interested in locating within the Building +G, Mich is ur�ei^ construction. (See Exhibit �A.) Nowaver,� a itviewF of tbir� Specialty, ConmerciaT Oistric9 in Subarea 2 of the Foofhill�`� Boulevard Specific Plan shows that drugstores and pharmacies are neither, permitted or conditionally permitted. The developer. beli.evas that. Gemmel Pharmacy y with their`maK4'urz of retail goods and sere ices wouldtee'c- the-. inietlt „of the SpeciaTty`Commercial -district_ Attached fior the.torrn4c3ion`s Review 1 is a letter from .Gemmel Pharmacy explaini.—S .in detail their business operation and,speciai chara.cter.isticS� B. Intent of the Specially rommercial' District,; Accordirr! to the a�othiil Boulevard— c ian, peg aaty for rcial' .is intendF1 to accoanodate specialty USC4, :-*ich p.offt�' a iandmark quality or create a Special ani�;E';nc , wPtich ris unique xo a particular area. For example, specialty ttsns such as farrmrs' markets, cafes, bakeries, gift shop-- khd otllmr specialty theme orlei'ted Wises lensi su ;or to 'the establishment of a theme'-oriented activity center, There,.are o0 ivee (3) areas .designated j;or SptciaIty Cbmm6rciaf-� p �. tire. FifWill Boulevard 'Specif c Plan; namely, ) tne�'Thaat , Winer`,/ Pla_a at'the nurtheast _ccrne,r of Foot'lilI and Vineyard, 2) at the'westarn end o€ the C-iiy, and 3) at the trttersectioa ,17 T�I.ANtdIN � 1 iSMo STAFF"REPOR i SPECIALTY;.' ERCIAL 45E gWOL PHARMACY f u ; 1, ` of Archib a �Avenue. Attached for' yvur, reference is the summary tab of perrrittgd and conditional!y permitted uses fo.r SpgcJalty O) rcial district. C. (inagueness of.,them rouosed lise"05ammeT :Ptiarm � Gemme{ Pharmacy storesi-ange in size frosty. ,OOQ square teet to D,r404 square feat. The,;prod!ct/service sold inclutles ,a pSiarmacy department, - sates and rental of medical e'uipm"en4 and suppiie§, candy, g'lfts sand, a oda. fountain. A comparison of the mirk -of uses clearly';sh�r s that tr is different from other major chain di^u� sioxes,=sucln�as Thr i'fty,, 3a�-On, etc. Ghat sets Gemmel Pharmacy apart from the other' national "chain drug r stores is their small ze and emphasis,on gifts, as well as the old .fashioned soda�i'ountain. In fact,, a look. at the retail uses asQ._described above"'show that the,+ wo .ld be cofisidered Speciaity� Ntail`"and wound be permittad under the f'pecialty`rnmmercial.�istrlctexept';'for the pharmacy portion of the business. III. RECOMENDATIONi . Based on the above analysis, staff'feels that the adding of such ,l'and uAes to tt�.Special ty C�cmmereial" district warrants-,,*:onsideratiost. 0 'the CoWssion cancers, 'then staff should be directed to initiate,ar�.amendmdt to;the Specific Sean. G' Re fu 11y'subm "ed, Brid Bu'lrr C?ty Planner: y1 AttaGSirentss letter'from Gentaoet -Pharmacy'"Croup; Inc., Sum�?,,r Table of,land Uses in :roothili Spccif'.it",,PlemT %' y Ey'h-16A A'' Site Flan r L !I r� GEMM EL PHAPMAQY GR®U N, INC.,I NC,. \� 143 NORTH EUCLIO AVENUE ' .• ONTARIO. CALIFORNIA. o A C 71-4 ., / 084.-713`9 . ON7M14 LIyINO.MONTCLO/R OPLANR AL LOMA NOPCO:BUN CfTY,FI.lLL6PiD�_,,CUCAMI`,NG..,MMA LOAAA R Z, BOX 63t-1 61FOfiNMff781 I •I� li November `•27; 1989oil NOV30 `.A r Brad Buller Bu City Planner City of P, .ncho Cucamonga 9320 Baaeline t oad P. O. Box 9.07 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 RE: Thomas Winery Plaza Dear fir. Buller: As requested by Nancy Fong of your staff, included are some of the unique Features of Gemmel Pharmacy and our , elated business: Gemmel. Pharmacy is a twelve stoM, family operated azd owned drug .store chain. With "situated headquarters locatnA in: Ontario, and nine of our stores situated in San Berni.�dino county, we are committed to the Inland Empire marketplace. The typical Gemmel Pharmacy is ' six tllauaand to nine thousand square feet in siz',e Gemmel's is a I'Emall town" pharmacy providing excellent, personalized service to its customers. Besides the pharmacy department Gemmel 0s provides extended service to local hospitals. in the Rancho Cucamonga 'area-we provide home medical equipment and supplies to patients discharged from San AicEclY^�1.V' Community Hospital. This equipment:_ includes wh-,:Jchair#�,r €di; .ard walking aids; as we`ll as oxygen and taspi tory items. Additionally,' we v)-mArida. extensive supplies an3 services t^ r' o�tomy patients and pediatric: V Gemmel.'s is known throughout San Bernardino County for having one of the largest candy departments of any ntore in the County. We specialize; in imported Candy . and sell locally made candies such as Russell Stover. We are also ",• going !to add specialized open candy which will be sold by • the pound. Our cosmetic departments are licensed to sell desig ner line., Cosmetics such as White Shoulders, Shalimar, Chanel zzd j Nina Ricci. Such high-erd cosmetics are. usually ;sold in departmentL Stores.` We have a very_Gxtensive gift departmentt selling such high � t Mr. Bta& Bu1ler 4 1 Novsmner,27, 1085 f quality gifts ad crystal, glass 4md pox o ]a3�n items. as well., as jewelry and persona-I toilet fes W�f also lave:a largo card display, .arc�Ti�i�ig �c var?aim,oe t4'i braricd Cetrds. Additionally, we are going to, opearate='Jan "ol a fashioned)t , F soda lountai:n in-th-s Itr 'txo na� Winery,Plaza store;; 1�hi soda auntain i.� to be pat be after tra'i tional;a.dxuq store fountainsU in design, sa]Ling a vaY�_ety df 01d i fashioned drin3cs and ice creams, :' / rmlike i our- larger rompati-t=s, Gemmel Pharmacy does not sell a=,ttomotive supplies; home appliances, cl;athingt gardening supplies, viampin( gear, too--k and haidware) Paint, furniture, sport4nq, goods, or. pets' .applies. We also do not sail ' iq�aor., wines or�beery' ' Our operating hours Ore frow q:o0,aa.m. to 8:00 p.m. Thy! typical Gemmay.a Stogy} employs aroun ��ten people.'-' Please do not hesitate, jto conj;act^. ,:a if yob ;need .any further .information. Sincerer 4` l Bar, n r xecuti Vice Pr" ant GammeY Pharmacx U up, Inc.. : BV:jc, ~ . !' ti sillgrlaFay' T1aF3E. of t�=F8tlI�"l'7"D "cx) AND CONiDX;TZQ{mid,`Ll.Y PEFfNLTT�Fla (d) USES SW!.-xi,i one Subarea Tan Subarea Three "StOwea Four Retail 1 awwcial Lis- SC CC D M P SC CC a" SC Cc CD LM tR t) M M FM tSt U ,. AIStiRte$iCpS.. - X �:x X X APP a)= aauti s x x- x x X x X X x b) Sendrtl x x 7( x X x x x Appiianre Stores and Repair I X x x x - Art, Mimic, and flwtographic Studios and Supply Stores x x r 't X. x X ^` Auto Servico Station 0 6 a q a 0 D Auto Service[including aotarcycles; boats, trailers,cspets)s a) Sales iwith ancillary repair facilities) A a D i;. Rentals D a a a s 0 Ninor Repair faces nA include sa)or egine irk, muffler shops,painting,body work, upholstery,etc,[ 0 a a A D d) Pain-op hashing e) Automatic washing f) Pa,-tS and Supplies x x X X X Bakeries trstail only) X x X X X X X X x x Barber ace!Beauty 94S x x x X x X x x 'x .. % Xt Bed&Bmkfast a a a 0 D D A a Bicycle Sops X X X X X x x to 9lueprint and Ptwixapp;.Services ` x x X X X x X y Book,Sift,and Stationery Stares lather thai adult related material) x X X X x X x x X Candy and Confectionaries x .x X X X X x x Xt Catering Establishments X X X X X % tl)lna ark 8la§suare Storrs X x X X % X x it aristmas Tree Sales Lots .(operating an a teaperary'tjeis, x x x x Churdks C D 4° D 0 0 0'0 (1 0 0 A q Cicming and Pressing EstablLAdwts X 'x x x x X X x X x' cocktail twjV (bar,IMO- a town) including related mnte W rawnt A 0 a D D a a 0 a A D Come7dal Becreatiml a) Indow uses sitdb as basilic; and billards D D a q' a s a a b) Wtdcar uses such as tirlds and bastatball 0 0 D D 0 a D a Convalesnnt Pacilitiee and)bsoltals a 0 0 a O a tl D D` a 0, Curtain Ltd Arapery ShoR% t x x- X X. X x Day We enters Deliratesmens and Specialty Food Stpnas X X X X X X X i r Drug Sttrs"3 and PWaaciaa X X x x x ' Faraws Markets X: x X R X floor covering Shape x X s fSUMt1ARY TABLE aF EERMITTED (X) AND CONDI`T'7.ONALLY PERMITTED (0) USES SuNrea one ( SL;wrea Two Subarea Three subarea Fow Retail Commercial Uses- SC tx 0 tR P SC CC Q" SC Cc(xi LM M U (A( CC RRc m i,I. Florist Shops X x X x X X x x X X X X , — Furniture Stores X x X 'x' x X X x Nardware:Stares X X X x X` �y Health and Athletic 6)'es and s (height Reducing Clinics x 0 X a X 0 a x x* �. (+,bb " r ems x z x z x x x zt lea Crean Stems and Soda Fountains X x X X. X x X X X 0 Janitorial Services and Supplies x X x d X4 Jewelry Stores r X X t X X X X X Laundry (Self Service) X x X leather Goods and Luggage Stares x x x X x x X Y Liquor Stores. �. a 0o ao o I Messenger ate dire Services X X x x x X x At Music, Dance,and t(artial Arts Studim 0 X 0 X 0 X X- x Newspaper and Magazine Stores x x x x x x x x x x x 0, Hurserizs x&rden Supp:y Stares within enc.osed:uea X x X X X Office,Business Nachine and Computer Q*onent Stores x X x X X X x Paint,Blass, and Wallpaper Stan X x X x x Pet Shop X x x x x x X X* Record and Tape Stores X x x X 1t X X X x Restaurants(sit dcmh a) With entertainment and/or serving of alcoholic baveragm a 0 0 0 1 b) Inadential seeing of beer and wine (without a cocktail lounge,bar, etten't3it�� or dancing) . x x 0 x x 0 x X 0 c) Cafp limited'to 20 tor eats (incit✓, u ing outdo seating) X z X x x x x x X 0 X z d) Fist rt"-0t with drtvv<v 6 0 D Mithout 0-1ve-thru 0 0 0 0 0 6 p- p SSe Stores, Sale and Repair x x x X' X x x x x Spacialty Retail 0 U 0 Q tl 0 Tom.. 0 Sporting Goods Stores: a) Specialtyi backpackinngg, tennis, skiiing, I-,Vmn in- rering fishing, etc. X X X Ir x x x b) sgnvai; encompassing c variety of sports equips.'snt X x X x g Superaarkatt x � X X. x ,I Saieainq pool !! lies X X x X ; Tailor Shops, X X X x ` X X X x Television, Radio,M,Stereo and C0 C em nent Was x X 8 x x_ a �. SUMMARY TABLE OF iaki ITTEp {X7 AND CONDITTONALLY F'gallITTED (MILUSc?i Subarea One Subarea T; 4barea ilret Subarea*ow =Retail Commercial Uses- SC CC 0 tR F SC CC a Mff a:G:CO LtR iR U ',J CC RRC vet LI Toy S'ui'as n X X X X & I,x �...._._ Variety Department Stores,Junior _ �Mtt Stores a X m a x a X X x Vets-nary (damestis) )a H atha•°ding X a x C x % x x b) Dowding a 0 a I a s hatch and Clock Rapair Stores x I x x x X x it x xa Ywd,W Goods Stores, I x R X x ' Dae Rhana Two Subarea Tlm Subtrem,Four Entertainment and CYiltural Uses,- SC cmaa W M m a tm S2 Ct£a UR)R U Ma tit RM MIU Arcades W-turallArtlst EzhibiLm a) Indoor gallery and art sates X O X x ❑ X X b) Outdoor ert eshibi:s x a x a x 0 a Discotheques a 0 0 0 a s 0 0 Theattrs:_ a) Dinner theatre b) povin theater 0 0 D O O Subarea One Subarea Toe: Subarea Thy Subarea Four Office and Administrative Uses- CC a KI P SC CC•9 ff SC CC M 2 tt MI U Ml Cr,FM MR LI Administrative, Business, and Professional 0►flce x x I X x x z x X x X x+ Rankr,Finance Services i institutions without drive-thru X x x X x x x x x 0 1 x .with drive-thru a o a o 0 0 a p. o 0 0 D Business zhd Office Services X x x x x z x x Intend•Decorating Was X x x x I x X x x X Medical/Dental Officeb and Rsiated Health Crinics X x x ' X % 0 X It Optician e.d'Cptcmttcicai Snaps X X x X X x O X if Realtors znd Rsal Mate Offices x I x X 1+ : X a. C X x x* Travel Agencies x. .x x x X X X x x X x xr SLbarea one urea Two $Libnea Three Subarea Fear Residential Usrcry_ CC O)rtt P SC M 0 W :C CC CA LM tR U M! CC RRC)R LI Single Pally Uetaclt x �� x Single Faily Attliawit-,Alex,, triplex, a rpleit) x T X X x I X tfulk�--family OseIl;oyt�. _..-.e x X %`max 'ter Ancillary Resideotid;thes: al tome-circ,ft&�Alities (6 W Imal x Y X x x X 61 Mrsits private recreation i facilities x 1C x x IC z o Accessary Uses: b _tstras ) atti X x X Y € 0701-02 0 12-13;-- 9 PG Aaendd o` 5-of 5 S1J1 lMAFtY TRSt-E gp PEFtPfI TT� cxt -AAID comi See tIJAL -j*FRH1TTED 4_03 _L1EES Subarea ate Subarea Ta* Njarn-Tires Subar"Fur Public Uses- SC M Q MR P SC M U MM SC M CO UIR MR U MU m Mr in U Transit facilities "lit Utility Installations � X Subarea Cst! Subarea Iw Subarea Three urea Far -Htel Uses- I=CC a I R P SC CC an SC M CO US MR U NU CC W tR tI Natelfratel t a Y Hotel Facilities tisajor) X Ancillary Usess 6 GfestyAlrber S X cl CateringServices O d) Cocktai i.oungs O e) Confereolcunventicn Facilities O f) Florist Shops X ) sift S*S X 91 Newsp:perlNazine Stares X it Pharsacies X j) Restaurants Wt dowel X k) Tourist Information X 1) Travel Agencies X Subarea One Subarea Two I Subarea Three Subarea Par industrial Uses CC O top SC CC O tilt 9C m pm 1!R tR U m M RX MR U All industrial �the Industrial ifs Cl be sprwided in Sub-ar '3 G: 0 a Refer to RRC rotein Section 11.9.2 �t a' 7�y�f3iE _�� a+�c :� _ •yc-taEx��t k3, �� 1,A - p ♦ i '7fY . R cINIF R _ ri►. t 1 t . '�s..�! Kra' � �. .a s tv a'.�~-'rvvlfr't`i a' it � . . E1►, `,}���•. KEW- 4� Y a.•�r