Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1990/03/28 - Agenda Packet
03, P," r U C�JGtl1AQ a. 7vav+`rliA e F RAI �Cj �CgA� ��1'������►T���Wr a ' hl � C �7 o a l97T ` WEDNESDAv N4RCH' 28, 1990 7.OU.p,m.'' LIONS-PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 0161 BASE:tINE RANCHO CUCAl10NGA', CALIFORNIA w I. Pledge of Allegiance I1 Rol l :Cal l Commissioner Blakesley Commissioner` McNiel, Comm issioner`Chitiea. Gomm`issioner Tots y 7 Commissioner 'It :erger'l t k r: III, Announcements IV. Approval of Minutes March`,1, 1990 Adj6urned point Me .4ng with Historic Preservation Comm, Sion r Rarch'14, 1990 V. Consent Calendar. The following Consent Caiendar items are expected to be routine'aM non controversial. They W1 4 be acted on ye the one time without discussion.:-If anyone has ConLorn over. any';Item, it should be rerrwed for discussion. A. DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 12332-2 --JCC DEVELOPMENT The design; review of building .,elevations and detailed site plan for .30 lots of a previously approved,tract, map consisting :of 11 single,fall fats 'an 141.4 ,:cre of .l;and i'n` the Uery Low Rssidential District (less than 1- lling units/acre located east.of Haven Avenue a'ld,'north of the,"4illside Flood Control Channel, APN #074 52'U-6 through 23. and 1Q74 531 1`� through �,'anz_I 14'thrdu.gh 16. x r t E C Al L c 8. DESIGN REVIEWt FOR TENTATIVE' TRACT .13812 - MATT SOMERN " `CALIFORNIA - Oesign review of building elevations,and detaijed site.pia for ,a' previously..approved, tract map-consisting of ,151 single family lots on'.56.77 acres.of land.' in the Very LoW Residential D.i�str�ict (1 2 dwelling'.units per acre); andi�e Lola Resident)-al. District (2 4 dwelling'-uni:ts per- ;acre),; "located north of Highland.Avenue; sough-tf S�.Wv;t Avenue, and weS�t of Et%anda Avenue APN;• 225 1fi1=3 t through 38; 4`�,.53, 55; antl• 61 and 225-171-01,:,09, lU, and 17 9ssocrated with' . this pro3ect`atse Tree Removal Per�nits 90,-0Y ,90,14. t r. YI, Fublic Nemlings The fo11dwiitg 'it(.ro are ' pu4i'c hearings in wit ch "cdncerned individuals rmy voice their opinion.of..,the related peoject:•.'',PIease, unit to be •recognized by the,Chaimmnr d address the Cwrmission by stating your nme and address. AiI slcch opitti:bns shalt be a;imited :f to 5 ninutes�•pei� individual for 'each prajact =Please'sign .iy after speaking C. VARIANCE 90-02 - OISARIO o A.reques to`al low the construction of a 5-foot,- -inch solid :block wall wi't!tan,,the front yard setback of#,�`1ot wiihin.the Very Low Rest:dential;•District (1 2 dwelIing`"`units per acre), located at 5255 "Jasper:Street' � APN: 1061=221- 2.. (Cantinu6d fro March=I�l,� 99D.} D. VARIANCE 90-01 - VERA -.A request 'to allow the .construction.of.. a hawse to encroach into` the required intemor,side yard. setback by 5 feet for a.single family, residence located, in the Low ResidentiA.1 District (2 - 4 dwel-ling units, per acre) at 9817 lFeron Boulevard -' 6 : ,209;063-03. -(Continued _from; March.'14, 1990.) E. 'STREET' NAME;.CHANGE 90-01 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A' proposal to. change,name of., old portion from. 4.th Street to .;. point appro timately; 600' feet �ngrth,::of 6th Street, a distance of approximately 8/10'of a mile .Suggested' name change to. Smiti Avenue. Propo3al to a., so -:change'name of, that portion of Rochester ''Avenue-(new portion) south of i;th Street. Suggested ndme:thange to Rochester Court Alternative street names may be considered by the Planning Commission F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE t?ERMiT�''90 JUNG -.'A request to,establish a liquor, store io. 1,UZ square;, foot leased space; within the 'ihomas Winery" Plaza;} tin thF' , 'Specialty -Commercial, District;, Subarea. 2 bf' tbe. 'Foothi"i j Boulevard Specific Plan," l,ocated �at'� e,'_northeast chi ner:of- 1 Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard A+anue,. APOt 208-1011'621. ail_ .:I G� MODIFICATION TO ENTERTAINMENT .PERMIT 8944 pEPPER�SWMEXICAN r RESTAURANT - The. review of a 'raodtficationo an a'pprovgd �'� ' entertain � ;t�`permtt al'.lowing five- entertainment In. conjuste��an;`with.resLaut�aht use, tocated,at 9740 19th Street APN -.1076-01114.` �� � P �ENVIRONMENTAC ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONALI.USE PiRMIV:`90 09: NGHIA THI DO The request;to establish a`:conveni;ene,store In " a leased Ace'.of",1,750 `' square?. .feet. within an; existing•; commercial center •on 8.2 acres 'of Tand ,in the .Communi-ty'. Commercial D stwtct Subarea 3 of the, Footh` , I. Boui,evaN, Specific Plai, .located at 9319 Foothill Boulevard, Suite A APN: 208 261=5J., } I. 'ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VESTING• TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 12781''' DELGAR - A subdivision of 9.35 acres,of land:'into;3 parcels in the Minimum ImJacf !,Heavy- •Indu':ir al District,:. ay. Subarea 9 of the' 'Industrial' Specific. P an,, located a,} the' southwest corner of, Jersey Boulevard and Rochester Avenue - APN: 229-111,07 J.- ENVIRONMENTAL. ASSESSMENT -AND TENTATIVE'PARCEL> 00 12336, KENSLEY-BUFFALO. SIX, LTD. 1, A subdivision of. 13.78 acres,of: and 'into ,4 parcels in ' the General 1646strial District (Subarea 11), located on the northwest corner, of 6th.Street and Buffalo Avenue APN: 129-262'-2B. K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND .TENT ATIVE'r PAL RCEL: .MAP 12756 -` LEISERV, INCi A :subdivision "of' 7:03 ,acres;of land rAnto 2 . parcels in the General"'Commer.,ciaj. Development District,;: located on,.the west 'side_tf Haven..Avenue and„»orth of FootfiiT Boulevard - APN 1177-4(' 9, t L. . ENVIRONMENTAL<ASSESSMENT 1) TENTATIVE 'TRACT 14459 L.A CHANCO`-,A residential subdivision of 37 single family tots on 8.3. acres -of land in :,the Low Medium esidential District (4: - 8 dwelling'units 'per arse), located at the southeast corner of. Archibald,-Avenue and t6mbn'_Avenue,. APN: 1 201-251-3;.4 .40 and Related to this project is Tree Removal Permit 88-63. ' VII, ftw Business i- M. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT. REVIEW `89-21;- GREAT WESTERN HOTELS - The development of a 6--story hotel 'totaling approximately 107,81E square. feet,on 2.5, acreS of Iand'at the corner of Wh te,.Oak and, Spruce, 'Subarea e7,of the Industrial Specific Plan - APN;;_ .208-352-314 N. MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87-42 . - SOUTH iPACIFI'C FINANrIAL CORPORATION - . A request to modify -the, Appro�, building materials for an existing buiIding;,in .the Tennif Executive Center, -:located at 10750 Cilc -Center Qrlve, `= APN: .206-062-03. VIII. CumissiwBusiness JX. Public Counts, �a s TFti 3 '.< 3 1"e e �t im2 '`' nd�� lace � r �t e t t ., � ,.t, a p �o he g_nera . pab is i;a a�rsss the so on Stems to .be di�etussed here' are those;-eui dh`do .not. s atread�appear on fthis agenda.. t, A ,l _ Mjd tl".i4he , a The Plannin ' fssion, has adapted Ac)nintstrcltivd Re cations that. 9 r 9u Set.ait � i7 q �nuMriient;tfirr : 'If'items go`tiayond that tirr , they shall`be hrFr rd g ll y`wi tit"the x nsant of the Canh�AS on. r _ ' t 1 } r. H � T� `r} � ;'l i � 1 (7' �4 lIh s j CS t r , K ryy vi F a u ty k :'VICCINI MAIP" �-- ! ' teeracr CCSUC6 asm ." -am s f a e Sam w®dem` Ina '48.1 ® - ® . j` ; Tj 3 so t k', o Y �y[arpWO.•eWbn`�COYYIy Wa�+ee WaFW' ij. .J K / f i C=-OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ST F REPORT, DATE: March 28," 11,96 T0: Chairman.and Members`o the, Planning Commission. FROM: Brad Bulle', Eity Planner BY: Beverly +iissen;.Rssaciate P:anner" SUBJECT: DESIGN;`REVIEW` FOR TRACY 12332-2 .4CC- OE'JElOPMEN7 The design rev'40 of building elevations, and detailed site plan for 30 lots of a. previously- .approved . tract map, consisting o 151 single 'family dots on1 4 acres _of land in" the Very "Low ..Resi'dential' District„ (less than 2 dweliing-units, per..acre), located`east of;;.Haven Avenue ;and north of the,'101:lside Flood Control.,Channet- :APR:,1074 521-6" tbiough"23 and 1074-531-1 through" 9, and 14 through " 16; I. PROJECT AND STE 'DESCRIPT10Nc . A. Action Reauettcd':; Approval of the"site plan, grading plan, and buildingieievations. B., Pro 4eet-Density 1.45 dwelling'units per acre C. Surrounding Laiid Use an&Zoning- North -;Vacant "(proposed Tentative Tract 147711.; Very.Low Residential District '(less"than 2.dweliing units per acre) South - Hillside F1ood,Control Channel and Tract"12650- .. Flood, Control and Very Low-""Residential District, , (less.than 2 dwelling units.per acre) East - Vacant;',Flood ontrol West - S.ingle Family Residential;'Very Low':Residential listrict (less.-than 2 dViei,li,ng units per acre); 0. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Very Low "Residential; (less than 2 dweIli"ng units per acre) North - Very Low Residential; (less than 2 dwelling units"' per acre) Sou'ih Flood^Control "and Very Low. Density Resident.`i,- '('less than 2 duelIi.ng Vni,ts per acre) Fast - "Flood Control i y` ITEM A P � PLAtiNI06 COMMISSION, Sl AFF REPORT11' R OR,TV 12332-Z JCC pE9E1, ENT Page �' r hest _ YerY toys Residential; 41ess than 2 dwelling units per, acre} ascent from. northwest to E. Site Character-�ls'roximatetye O$pcurrentiy vadedt'arid some auerage slopeThe pro ect i s 'currently rough.9r southeast, . , The site is bounded on .the streets have been constructed, And on the north by ` South by<the Ni'llsiderCCreeek`;Ghana east..by' Faa14T1tt41 r property' and the Oee,,proposed for Tentative Trae,t vacant land currEnily p P Single Family lots on 25.9 acres). Il, - ANAt_. , Yam=° t Cammssibn on My it A. Back round: Tentativeb Tr h."Pla"Planning lots, an 14S ac Phase " originally approved Y 1983, The apP7cant then proceeded to rear consisting,(. f 63'_1ots but fatledirat*in to record of,the ther tractemapf. the tract resulting•';�n the exp Subsenuantly, �,t+�e'applicant`.4L`aEand). received151 fats: etln anuary on February i24.,1986,°far the remad the iB$ 19 9, the G�ty Council approv'zd the final maA15;�i989ate agreements and the map was recorded an February11 design Review application for al1,: 151. "lots in CommiasiPnon aPPraved for Brock Names.. by t'",� Flann�ng } " February 3fo Since that time► those lots.-beve been sold: to ,tCC Deve'lopmento ` licant, •JCC Development,`has g, uen� eral: .At this time: the aPp 52 znd 108 Review far '30 tots r3Z through N� and submatted a Des?gn' ra using 6 plans Os, E* F, 6, through 116) XC'is proposing J). Each. floor_ p1 n haA11 ;;f the4 elevat ons have'sideon having' 3 eievatianS= 13•different'COI or garages except for`:Plan 'F. 0gina'ilV, ra a"sing a . , wners Asss iat=on, espouse to' concerns voiced" by sch�nes were proposed, but jWe applicant-;is naw p p the Nameo � The phonies range in size total of 30 different color schemes. rqx;mately 5,000 to 6.000 square feat, from app- The plans `have all` t 'levels d tem be mi'designed ng ias much-as ossible-'—, walls in order o minimize also comaly.with the., WildA09, enve#nPe building Ordinance. requirements as outlined in the Hillside Grading rr 1990, 0esi n Review Cainttsittee.vteThe' DeSig! wedthe pe3ect on Miarch BCRie1, Weinberger,; Coleman re and approved it with the `following coi,d:itionS .• r of PLANNING C014M.ISSION STAFF REPORT OR FOR TT 19332-2 - itt DEVELOPMENT (arch`28, 1990 Page:3 1, Rock 'ar brick:detai,Iing should be carried through on the chimneys for those eTevat'ions where brie. Or rock is f proposed,. Revised drawings 'should be presented to the Des.ign;` Rev iew:Committee for Y�Wew and approval prior tO is$uanCe Of 8uiidi»g; Permits.. 2. The 33�Elevation' shbutd:be revised,.�'toprovire brick-at the bottom of the pilasters. ' Revised drawings, should ,be presented to : he Design Review Committee far ruviey[ and'' approval prior to the issuance of 'Building Permzts'. 3. The F2> Elevation should-be r6vised do provide 'additional rock Wainscoting. Rock =deUflincq. does, not ,need. to be added at the base of the pilasters' 4. `The Design Review, Committee- raUld not reach a<'decision regarding additional ' detailing at`,the base,, of°, the .. pilasters far-elevations G2i Hl, ,and,E2. the options df concrete, stucco' 'or ~rock' bases were discussed. the Committee requested that t]JJS issue be reviewed 6y the full PTAnning Commission. D, Trails, Committee: The Tra Us. Advisory Committee reviewed the. project and recommended approval subject to the 'faT aw ng conditions 'Special covers are to be provided for manholes located within the trait.` 2. °Local 'trail 'fencing shal1' match• existing .!-rail PVC fencing. E. Neighborhood Meetings: Three meetings'. Were held with the, Haven View . .Estate. Homeowners. Association. City representatives were not. present; ,t the, first meeting which was held January 12,, 199,0 Hohrever,`.staff was`present at the two subsequent meetings 'held on;February 9, 1590,,and March-2g 149t! (see attached, there are three'main concerns'expressed by the Homeowners Association that were not addressed by the appiicont. ' These items nclude.;the following;; 1. -Vhz.re brick or rock is used as an. architectural element on pilasters, the material should be carried ail the way to the ground. 2. More variation in front.yard setbacks should be provided. i 3. The house on lot 42 should be reversed. I f pLANNINC, COMi4issro ''STAFF REPORT . DR' FOR'TT 1'2332-2 -'JC.C,PEVEL�GPMENI . March:`28,•,1900 Page'A III. FACTS FAR FINDINGS the: or'oject is consistent. iutth the Development Code and the General Plan anr'J;,e roject wili not,::be'- - ; detrimental. ' to adjacent properties. .ir 'cause signpficaiit environmental. impacts-... In' additions the proposed use is An, compliance—With..all applicable provisions of the`pevelopment Code and City staiards: IV. . .RECOMMEND ON; Stafif recommends that- q,Planning_Commission` a ve, Dest.gn Revlea for Lots,.32- through''S2 iii' d 168 through 1b f r ct 12332-o2, through adoption:of :the attached ReiglUtton with a ' tions.- Re pectfu ubm't d,. a_, Brad Bill i~ city Pla er s 66:8N:'s r Attachments; .Exhibit` "A" > Site Utilitition I p' 'exhibit:illSlli - Site Gi3dirig Plait Exhibit,;°C" - .Building Elevations Exhibit' "Q" - ;Bui.lding Estwzlope Exhibit "E"- .Conceptual landscape-Plan Exhibit illF" Equestrian Overlay trap };- Exhibit "G" - HQp Meetin4'Note /February' s, 1900 Exhibit "H" -''HdA Meeting•Nates/March 2,-1990 Resolution of;Approval'with, Conditi;ons t 1. ,I �.4 m Y f, I "�ix , �' � � ew,n4h4 Purl xls3 tl r,, �� !WNlty." .v fvirFk 1 ,4.e wt w.l lt11¢y. 1Ifi.�1 41 lie ;fir t�f}UP.f:fl:1) i li1lC P f j332 vY'I4 12934 { q u p1b d r A , ..i 1 +1111 It'�.a ,� ~�, tiff.9j �r✓�`G�.� � �_.� � a� j �.+ , + t t r '{;oTI;� C't' li ursµ�taRa tit�' 9. to• el,�� i, `�. � "jJ .z � e�+ ,��'' p , ry s p �:i 1"}i�r �� �1��3 11�� �� S��f®/� 1. � r, � � ['.Q�Eh U��}If�fbllf !�•, �1{ dye' ur,Fil t °!h % >s r,t! -JCf i,rib C4 ` � c E R• s t•• / o ti9Ofl 4i6 NY tlYb � _''A GG -filar SITS UTILIZATION MAP TENTATIVE TRACT_ 1.1332 MY CF SCA LEI Sr. So \\ nit ,ell ,`�...�~ .� `�'�a, •� \! Jim.......-,��'- .1.......» C• e� - !� ' y.�K.,,,, �. 41 NORTH L _tt CITY OF J i '• ^\ _ • i�i ' a • I is Ol �f �Yy P •. ��a AM IF Vv d, _...... yr�� Js' A ter• �l�`; /�. � �:t � I Nom CI'T'Y RANCHO C .: Tnu. N PLANNING WGION ExHjffiT.- SCALE,. iul.aliLil i ...tl�Ir/lita■... rult.l.u.ultlltlut IY.t II.■11 u. ® liiuu.11■utt1�1./l ulultlT�■/Iulullttlt_" ti 1.1f/■lltllll■tlt t.■.aalllntl.11t111u11.11.It.•. t.lu/Ittlall l Il Hlul/Iltl.■IlIlllltl/11/1t1.111. 1.11 .Itll/uuuuU 14C'rll,tt1J11111ullltlltll/1u■ .rrirtl/tllt.. y .Iit/IItu111ta.•^/iuuL; rIt111u.t1/11111Ju11 I1111t/1►solo--- loft■lotw Ili■t1 t111ll1t11 y11u Il llul+. zv.•r■t1llJllt.u- :./.---- u.n■lt.ltr.. ■.m.uor a .uo■ ■■ uun ae■mm■arr■1■ ■■■■■O■ !) 1■ft■l rl ■mr■■. ■■O■Name■r■ - ■■uuu at sun. a INN INN ■ur■nnru' M�agH■ a ■user ■■ ■uu. ■ua■snuu ...,,®....-- loss . .,. _. 1llultl/uulul._. ■1 ■uti■ ■r aura ' ■a■.■■mrur■ ' ..10 e:C: rr ■uu■ rr Sur.; �o ■ ■■m■■ r. Su■�n■■ rr .0 a u.sr■n■tr.o moo ui ..61.. �r ■.uu■ur �u■ u■ul/ ®..um■t■■■uar■ -- ■.....r 1;..1l 11..1 1. .ll r 1l 'iiiuuuuutuuntuunmul■uuit is 12 `1 ... Itliul ut■IO/UUt1.Up11rt11tl l.0 bl ItlUttt111/IUt ......... Is .. .. 1 ut1u11.11....l1Ifu1 i■iu tl lltlulll ttl __ .y.-`'• rt 11.■.n ll.11r 1n 1tJr loft 1t.tr 1 It.11.1 1.11 rii■l(nlllutt(IIY.IIII.nI�.11llttl.l.1! a/lulus}uun.SJ�..I1.111y1i i1t. ® �iv■■ =.v l�� . � ■ � ■■rum ®®Sawa w.v■ �.I(iiil ■ ■■■rU /UOU1ut1 uu■l • t a'uuu.nuulgq■ nl 1 �.� Olt.......... uI!,,;" 111111 •. .autut111un .Ytqunlupl�uunulM4 �� ..nul u l m. /••..u II hilt.._ .Munn •. .. -- ---` — �.• _.' .. _;,_ Ib :b�- uw .unulnnt.-.- l ur:..nuutu uuuuui� ■o■ ■■u so I �ltO�011 u1t tltulurtrui �� 1 Swims■■ 1:■vuo •• uuu' ib..�i Ii.•ra� - --_ Y ■■sr■n■■ �.ur Iru ■u■ulineman nm■■ ®t® .■ arnwnBlast au■ ■uaa■ ® '! uar r� ■ .■:.i � a9niiaa., ■I:Iualtlllalla .. aji/OlO,aatlOataig ns u atiuuuuuaunt■punurinuOr.: _ =,lanuuuuruulluurpuaunuu.�ul? tIHI�III!II IlUO11l Il11Wa/t11�I101tlO O■IaO �m uap■:u all ■■air■a larl,�"i qul■a.. uu ■nrna uu n■■aaa � nn L u ■rarer■ _uu ■=raa=a pq r■ ■ r ■ tit""a-`. .Il:iial t�flr,• ��• uuuattfM+1, AFRs',r.. uuir.. - ..ttff4tflalalaa,tlit,44. l )ta111� �. MIN uu van:: 11 utl 'ram.■ru ■a■ru■■■ ��t.=.. r Samoa 1111 11' 011all,/arv...- uuf uuuun ri011q all}�tll ailRlla 111 a` ��. _ .R��IIaatIr111f/aata,ll Wat.a; liil4uuannnll;innnlnaff■ iL la m7ouunnuunlra�uualt4uuul, t1 t/a�lnl,a■uunluanuauuualluur■u pu_i�'' ,i::uuulrtinuli Itn Ih lu/ U�� urruunuumna,It� 1111 IRI III 0 t Ali Rlr 1 u 11 -■un — aniliiilx •..9a •r..I,��11a1aa .■Iallal1O11O111 � �_ ...iiiuuue,louauuuuuualu■ eFiu/uuW4nunu..t4._... _,.=_ . ■1O1111111 rtl1111f111r/111/tllllll�.�"-_- _'^^ Lllllllt11O11 IIIl1U11UOfa It U1O11a ..LiR1111111fpuu■..p,A11■nunulq�/OHa wii aui l t4 un uu arena //r■ uU1r '11� All 1111 Il tt ■/�IatO ttt■ tt�t I71 uu uv uu;uu nrll nu �r■a■-. u. g ■� pf111t111111�%itf�Nit/4i M ■rrrr sitrrnN■Iunuurlsrrsrlsurgrsrl alr,rirslr tintinuunau uurnln a Iu1�r� ■■ Intrrnaln1lrn�llf■Nfaf=n�u .ur ltul Ia/Ilf! a :�g11►7LIt11t111trIQ'I A fillltllfrf atllt111lif! �.ya l.AItI/Ii.,++�said N//. `S/r rS�/1/r}.ff.iNaroff /Iri/.:..,... \■■tii■ff !a ..T ■ y ■a■■"■O x It ■�aa auarsra anus i :���a ■taaax■ea■ — ua■;rur ��' ae■t t � •��:,: l!nr;ue■■a■ tea /nn1=219 'irr uuunrl.-. .:■ aaaa }a auai� ■a �a uaa:anaaaa■ nir .[r O■■ ■ ■■■11■atr■■■ ■t:■ a;t, ti ■■■\ti • a■,� aaaraaat�iu■a ■■:� ■■ilia , =e■Tar■rasa■ iiw iw:i:i �t■�■�y■t■uF �'' ■r iii ll��lialll lalllll+al to.. +fil/1/II/1■Il11N It f f to t■ tyltillf lfLNf.: - fi7{Ntf!t1tllfftfttllitft 1t afiuufnpl of/ufllflt10T11 t►1■RItIt111/Ltlftufuf�� -f tiflfrifffta fffi+ tfififfftif atff/ffifftfi�ftf) `t� �.•}'�"�ilf ufafit �`I ft fr/N}+/ i :: '. —`' T■T■■1 ■■i flit ai■■ ■■■a. ■t■{\a ■a■1t awl■■�,. at s■ 7a,r17 ni• fa• 15tff a'r+fa Al �+i■SNIT IIf� •,�I/f 11 tilt /f r a 11N1/flffa+ ilft�i ai�if t. f��ri• ---" --i—� leiv rrlr�'irtttflNI +ZNMI file u f nA`uuruuntf . lu ■■■■a ;tatsas 'a■asu /Irk+ 3■n eMa�ia�i 3■� mar � 14 r■qi �■.■ ■ ■ir■a■ 22 ■aZa■is ■� ar }ulF aniiH 7u_ ■a�... .ar i■ aR 1l! ■■ �� ■ f'a�i ��_; .uu 1a ._ ` iS11111t1I111` ifllflttftllfit�tt�tttl •f -'Tt1/T�If lllt/IIIt11t1 11t111t1■/t1i;. IU��it111tt�itltlliiti111itt/t111111i///Ir _ /ft�Mllittlffttl.til!lf,,,ll 1111t,,.H1111U1t,f/r1`�:U jj; �/l ■rrrur 1D DD err■ o �+ Il ■■■■■b .,ter,•, fT It fa■irN■ r■aas■ nn aa■■r■e■ ■rrr•u�■ 1111 ■r■uo■ �)T .a_^'!��t ltY ells i� r Itln4 tll�ii tic Iiiinutt _ ..Rlltil7tt/Niltltary� ,v� �) iUtlit ■ tari:: rr+ � >f(Iltfttia�fP.r .,._. : p;- �rrrri ` ?truat.yniiwWt� i�� aii itatai.. ��., �s ■ `� pp now... .Tii,ll If1G Ia a 1 - 1 tSS�tr�It�sta'trt/4. - - If f/t11a/llr1.ti11 ta/ Rt ,�r'; jj)�'eteitit7 li3i'�'���++t t attet itfitu++it++it i ttatalHllli111tt_ itit�t;fit}tlt�IltiTf/1Uit1 /�. 11'If a fl .) 19 /L It�1 II III t - Iir�ie�tluitt�i3i4f1i�1 -��-- niR"rt"t tuf `` ttt tii it(tfn tit. .. '.14 O UtttIIt1lllt11111[ _ � + 1 t ttfiftl t11tt iltlj;:�git���J��t� �S�un11t_,��_ rjlie�, a■Iii: nip: ■ a r ti s rG�■ � ■jiff r � �i :s s aruttouutra r�a; a a uum tLin{/fi�s_-x, _ ar ( �fr\ ;i,�t�rt\ts ■rr U r\taur :..ga:rl'.fuan.naµ•:. •--. —~ ■ .• ti\ rax rr .}tL■� F.Atal!f Slll\ _ /{{ a■rr sus n+ s■ertsr = ■nrr■ rtlo■r, !rl_ ■r■ .urr u.n a Ir /n/:/a/, a!{nr era ti■r■ t+.1 Kill unon*11 ■■o;>teet. .0.1 i�� anarrtitii\a\a\iir attAla rllJglrl�tu,tltO�il _^ 1411 ::::'.'::Sr:::':: ::r {.� fuurau■ • an rarer •!r♦ ..'� f_. P ., . Anra also :■, H.H.:rrrr\r71W\\R\c urumutty� ■vur a naupr■ <qr�ffrRrl�ai ra R-•,Rrr riraff rR ra t/i ■ ■ -■■y !■r,■■■ D a arfflW■ta11a nyrr as Fo ■■�taati „Gifar\ ..n■rl■r ■ ■i f�w�trar.eruafra■r�t�✓aaf✓,tyir,Nuu\ts {���'/M.� 1■r'.l■! ����$�1�t•RIRa ! ��ilalar"'v., �rl trtt rtri O4r ■ tr.r .. _. .. ii li ff�i. ��•�f � �'� li�,ff I e�ue:inle r■.,..fit r nee/u':{ a _ .' - t /{//{■!/ s a,-is i. !{!t■!pill. ... er■/a{n/,� •�.-' u■al■:Yaa ��� 11� 7`e $ I(I 1 _. /unuc Yiall Uf),'1■IIN,/f1.N1f,/■ "s t/tltltttit►►111111111 Jtt1[■111.711111NIlalMNUI1p111r1t111ift 14al lANa■HNIaI t11NIt la1■It111ttNNINN■1/►..4111./NlllllNt MA1lN.lt.pt11YY1ltrlt! �i1111tulp,rutaatu(1A11�A11ttf�l►alt�t.1�' g1;1L u r, IQ1b, ti`••` rr�'irx r..lr.r; alrfl■tlrsF r q luuununnu�l ..1•).r trtP ■1®..Yll■ wutluUnall/_ r..rr. 'rrtii.t lArm•11111. -T`� ..,_ ., - .L�Pqr. .la■RR ■et■t{AIRI.r 7N7, �iFllt n■ a - tiut tat'i��autaa,� ■uw uua, haul" S�� S !■trarrarn t'taaut■r► un■■ 7•,tK a. S.a t.�tuuru.,l.u.lau •■■�atiiii■,uniYt� •• bu. a.= p,al la.ttlnittl iiK. ■1, altattua.Nlglrl[rll }'t� t 1 N y•trot r.tuRY ti n airr.trtir:..artltYrt.tru, ,ta.i`y�w■4�1i11 /alltlt aaltl OAAl.ItROII►at.1 / .ta►a1 14aa 411Y/t.Xt ,i��/tull'aa�rs 7n Uettttaluau0ll�utr■,Rtauur■ itt �i�unuaa.,�#,la(tar ,aly a rn a ■1.77X..t. r 1� trt'rti. �� tit'ltt tRCUR _.. ■u/u IslasI .ARInlaws aAltatfi .} •, tlt71A1(tRtala a? it I=11�` ml�lJtitltL '�11.11 L -- Ilrc ii�ilmat71111 i'1� } d+■ill'Y rintein R■�Y.,._■_. r ' 1(Ei!lif!^jtttbNltli' ♦tlsiiftlif_ -„`fit: - ,A /�„■11� Win WN.uvw,. i1i■1►■R■t■.ems. +. tjlw ■f�Rl Ol ��■:■" �y •unnil►►`:y ::�_.++ ri�iiti��1 wta/1►n>hu j-�-- ,x •tl tl�;t11■11f :■ r lut�"'i.�tk■/t/M44�. R■ ➢/,t►/tat. t >'iut atl�n:- '^twl arl■� Iw —^ el! ➢1/LO//t ilAia[A\ 1➢fei➢ /1: fl ■➢➢/�!■■i elm)//. �0� fl /At■f� y- - , � eye nt■l.�t� !i!!!!C! _ .ru AY1a: lryhil■u■..1 T� r�® ��Ilillll!!I- ■in■ust: �}al � N r:. A Rolq IriQ s°a u ■pet ,. n ...� � a 't• T T.� 'M 211231 •➢eRi.[mlm[ nr■e. ■®Rlr:timee '.� �.� �,�_.1 _�1`-, 'vzollc■■. lE6➢a8i. ei{ei,fiO! •1`s.r♦ r s. l'°a■Ira-*„ oipi)iiai' ii➢ei�ii ■eeRepawrwr It ti 13 ii it Hs[i[[ef Oil li 1111 Ikil .//al t■t■ It 11 - — _ Ills Irlf till p➢f■■■t■ RII ■u1�rnfmHAIue■■eer e[li�➢[Mm ,° •�•� Y![l7fBlA n71 lnm-/[n '1~ . Ink ..'.° uaM■■t/. 71-r1 C/ota/u■I nrl:� fuf Iq■P' t!a /�R■p�■ Illl. 1m11,Ai1�, , ii r;> F s�rY 3 .l x ' �. �e�ys3.:ram .��.,•._ `i�'' �,�rw�*' t� rf�rw� K�t.w+.` s i4tV' to (" aebF�s■a. aRr(aYl, asa!■ ■■: +. iY ly !Rt'rrr. ■r■rria ■ii ilt � ■�e;,�aa, '!Y!7Rl. fly ,�■!Y: } iKItl. MULUAM on. w ) J I tt ii( iiii [it� iiii n.u. t ti I.i�ftYY��Ai'4^ n,� rffa'0 4RC.■rIlJ , tt y} " A "y i " 9 Jt■ral[/rtrutrlt 4 � /�Iti 11■{I111t 4Y t 1.� .1. .+ ■.1.t1a ti4r11 ` ���- „1 �,411i-•1 liu .z t um Iu �unuuLuu/n rr�rrt— r1 r u t ul .nnwnmuua, u■ �Lrrr4rr�� $.+. 'v iU1/! "�Iuuttlntll,uu■71p . I, — ®$�®d i.��•fI ��i■�7 Ili! i�liii fish r �—� ■ne.e ■ltirr a.. e.0 �... -.^ .._ . _ all a1■ A/r■ yu■ ■gnu■® ! ��•�iirnmi/� `irut rrrrrr lrrrr■ ®® /ip.rnuun /lnun.rr . ®IUrrrr]rrrer�® A 1aH�!!u/,lln/nflln a„{J1,,,uu„/ I,t!►iJ1 Inue"�, d1,Ittnitft1111■l1■■INn■� - to Ynuuunn.++.0 Urr�gr� lrrl'rrrr rrrr.drrr �nnuluaarrn..a �rrrrQr ��9elfer. ■rUr■ro rr�era ■aur ru■urr: MJA sr r a:: sJlarn +14�o;uu iss�ala�s ■ue11oR� wT ,'earl:{`_t ee: �� rr ti�rrr. a pa iituturueu,ll■tyuR .. ,.ifRfJttJllJ,ttJSAnuutnpJUL�uiT .tlfllYfultnu� .. ■■)1■1�!■�11t/Ir■Y/flf■/Lf■■■J�/.f■t��` l..ft■ fr■Rll • ♦ f f. t■ J■■ff 1 rr x f1 ■.fl i•i fu +� ;■JYJ ■Ifl lt/ ■iX tlltlltll/NJNf f M i+ Lf Yat!{n �ti�x J�n i.iiuuiuif:i ■,r)lf 1tUlYu■L4�Y r .1/i+ fxexintl ■alalul■l l■wli■wiu fu■nt., 1-:I/lt/UW■uu1�11/41tlJaitu/t141YIIl lllJautl all4lllNJ i■r ■Aul /tl/tltfglfttJr/f1'ttli)t t�Ri■NR■atsf■SIe 7!t}i1t ateitll!»itNl._tlJJ1/l1}��rtlAllLlttl(�ttlt)ttrll�ItJtlltt►, IP at'rt Itort. 1.. iit;l■■t y' rrtarlor■ "Arrlar■ • ■r■■aJ ■tlor■■r■ L'trr rrrt trn a■■ ■■■■' ntr■rr■ ■ru ■ ■e.■tea■ Yu� i.•.aY. ...a '.ihltitit��tul■R"•.... `Zy' 1■/ftUt■■■■■1/Ito/lt ZtItI■tttt:itlrt(t 1", RA /tll►■ltttUt/111111tltttl■■Ntitttllt,1ll 1a toI1"A t �tlJuutun■tuJttuf�,tu�'tnjtutnut uatlirsal. t.Ntitlolytltf■Ntlt Jf)■MI if. ) lUfl•l■fy.11/f "+) %,IUf)O■1tlrtlpj/t�■■B►■■■►11�IJ ttl 1■tt11lltt)t�1111At1f at(`� Ftriart rt�Atlr. logo, t7r r��ti 11as "9:41M INS' Et llorjl 2112a0r :4r*tlor-. Ylo ur ■rr�'Is F � 7oi erg w nr: —tir`r1 rrrt,---� .' >tttrlot lotarrt �irtltltlrtl, yitt.. 1 r■■waft lorrlotr 7rrl.rYttl l)t■lta:>. aft rlo■ trr..�pr �7eMFlitrR: `> RN h ■ir7 ■ r7t -r- r. n■au I a � r �_ _ { � :�rr�:t a■nura aauarr■ ■■■reau. (,. . , Tr .tn.vr_ ■enuu ■Wane uorrrrr r. lnruu ' oaru.■tl �rauure�` '�eun■I � ■!■r■ur . rrt Ur ■■!1'!a■r t�� }uru■ �m:aeu f -• -r s "iw//souses■ucaia etuanr ertr.r■■ r Ye' ■ee ' ■s �'. ■re�a■■• ' aeeu een: ■//su/u■ .: noose ■�aae■rur ■sraarua '� m1f11■�•1 f =if .�_iwar�1 * .. r jar • ,, all nr[a.u w g u � 1r■f rl iiii. ■faf • mot. ��■i Yfrr iaa�i r~:L Vim_.,.. � f lr•1a n � 5.� 1wi fa lrC;rs■ rl.ni ��r:�:. i m ln, trefll iftlil• u■ .us term ur �r gl�;ll■ ■pr,r�S nl Y .. I'�� .till 1rl rt■ ■lt! pt Alt. pl■tr. ■■ ■ll t_ �. fi1�f7Hf1{fifll f r Yu+1 urt+iif ua++t/aluuuwi{- +sr� rIt1111tYUtYItIlllUq/llilllll/U1a +$rsnu+ltunnr nugnunuu� inu: rtiv 1 arulrualluru�tuglnUufuvx �.+Igruf 4�� r��_,• }u1f1u ' nuiuu q14 .lauu want oil itrur (r(((�''''tjji'■amrrrr{ fiic lalll ral+f++lrf 4.++, a■■■■t a{a.{L i14{1��rerteria�IM■r■r■■ ■{■.{ tt�tltn {1Ll.uu IU€ —— �_.. r■q q■ r{a•u Ind a.taaau{ Ylta )�{{{►�i' till 1/e irr{1 Ll lU,. ttl r■ 1 1111111 l{■In illl Oet:/rrt IItI ltl {.tl -- ---=� lj{t {�', {{tl ltlt 1{It aiif 7iLiC1 f• ii a{; _ ,� aaa+{r■ �i1�IC�mm/I:eeetl�l�G�l;�■ ry �Itr� feel//r/ A e/et,eeet nnrru - }rf/uuUC�®� ueLu{r n+Ruu/rw. iiiuw Intll I ratu ul taural •`: uul . .. a,•r+rirrii/I"/iIri+lrafal r1Y�0 lyyrr .i'-- � '71Yt111111{111111{11111r t1l�t1t1117,1. dtltlOtl■ '� '� <.�.. 1ii■■i7i =»~ �ttltLtfs ■i�i■ YYIi1 "1 sh is an `o ■■ so ._ a a {�.� aall!R 11 1'1 ■ia YI tl ■fir a1r�P�a• ® e i f1�j .�1. I� ' .. ■�)ft - '� r7.. rvvv `i � iII 1I1t1UlItN, ll%Itllll/11/►111171-. Ill 1111►I►Itll it 11t t11111/llill[lMll/t14�i11I Ii O'rJ�rIAI![1(a) illll�lllllllU111t�jlt,pl4>.�.,,��lit141717 +;,.� �� ?III►1L lull 1%f ii.r ,ul w ue�11ri1 r11 U! 1■ rlt r■■ I,t nt t{-:.5ut�[tU Ertl Ire re■ ■ jj E IIIII�IIIIIIAutfll 1�1R/ loll ■■I111 I17:1 €:_ erR>au, ■;un t.1 ■u nl rr ■ 1111/1111 te R 1111 tl nnn It u I�■■,■Y t ■p 1�1 L pllrt If ►II�F CrI■It t ■■i lRs: (1 ill it■ ll lit °I'�i■�►; ■1Rau it� )tn ir■ tt� �lt�,� eretill■ ., �n ... c. � ere re■ ;�.�i 1.; ;yc, _�;.e ee■seat,., _ _....,.::_.,._.,._=.-�- 1.' _ ■seer■ ��".._ I® Ilsessf � � ■tM Vie■ 1�1 a nutm I'll u r. UJtut /loll r. r li/i t111d�t+u 111I1b..-;, ■ ;.ter./ '+1 \ illl{YYI IJ I,111111U ,{Utllfl�11.. r' >•1f17 tJtl qll UlU lth .ur,aw,ulr r llrlltu,/ �■ ■ _+.. tiuulut ai'��ii,u _ � ■■■ ■. . n1ltW nr��',, hull ;'jii4,li1 r■n uii I11' ululll'l,rl�! ':+l�irl Raaau��. {,.;.. uuor ull�•eii�lurtx�l,T� .el �' uar 11;1 �■■riu`::; T 3irer i�t �.111.111 atl S■■1�1■ l- 1.��■ -■■■■Russ Is1 r(il H1. 11 sfii lull an �ru ua�u Ila. I:i .� ii.i■■iw ® �i �_ IRi ,lilult11711`.•Il�i�llii�tf'li$'.- V a ., 4 - �, ties•• - MIAM. ■nra r reer re yrr 7rsr g�ti , rxs.1Hu i� r,rs..r.n ■■■r■■■■H er -�—. -■rlr'lwll ■Red '. ,s ■rl/'uu ■ ierrr'um .■ rarrrrrl J •!■,..�;. fie■ Ire■ ��.� L_�ierrnmr�,:; `.�,, — - ilr,�,rar �►• ; _, urrcirm ��� irrH u � eZ tllrrslr Mnsr W ♦ i 1•Y v s3 ;Jy i<rat ,y 1 5 y r OR a��if_ f 31�i..........� i�. �� �tl■�I �.ri■� x u4r e 1,1l,� lj.�' prme:I � �a s{ �,'� ►`01. c- 11'� 1l11 no -li 1I il,l i�l� il� 1 I Uzi Irt l�Junliu� %�� ))/tllrnjjnn.nt�a Ill wRl li't(Il flf ttl M,Il1 - i i,JL 1��Y,nt7uuuunnuuru ii�a `'!!�l��llfilll}1111,1J111111t(IIJIIY.Itil _ f )/J tllllill tlli,lllti llll)1■ 111 w,I�l.l l;llyp1Y111!!lalrUlUalJ,lla/ i,, erMtle■ tYUitl Yrr[YY�[ au,uul,` ' iee'eeei it7.1[t eee[leee �Ueilee[ '111171: elle7ee[ 1�'.,"% . rn '� , � '�, µp�ttinr■ }ram oea.nrr illn -.- ���� fff444 ■e ell..[tl■. {III'. ieereee■ . au. Isl. Init7 r/Yi147 tlIHrlll Ull❑a`(r. UJ/ 2 iar,al R, N Ull Ya�l al"lUl/ll¢ WIl LIt'l 11M, 11�t.'— a iarYl uJ . ataallr SI�1r '�1l��IrlL{U}IRlRIIUI ■ t �x �v f .� a viemm� • `(t 'S`.-«-�_..L.�.I �: e L 1� _mow' l�I���"®"I® • ate[tiiulsa �J,...�, uN1�Aunuuui � . .-� a uw1 rare abF,. ■.. rra.r■ra ■a: +. Mii•t •ur ue■ <- 11•-rl�� osr�tYrr;ru. .. ■ee■,aq■l rI— I�1 ! e I ea ■■e■a■w ■° � p1 ice• in oeA wv� rrF, 14S t !1 • _. _. �e e■ae■r■ F 11�a y it Utlt�l111t1/111II1151idIN •sZ . !wasy�,/"t` - II.al11■IIII/IIIILIIIi `t 1111Li1if.lil./1.M 2. �. �� n.■nis n /lY/u1t�1�.1lutuuttt�tall \ n.■ l...l'. _ mot s. t �]Orlttiaalq O[p[a.upgi( lfefeeat[efuffr.At.l.■l 9u: e tlta�le/etel /a.lRefal.tfl�yasmall t .i Vfu.f.e flees.■u.ulra /aA,.._�.., R- --� _ lfq. ele.e�A• go NSA. H.■�\ x ArP'eats►all Ir..r_glan2 0 , R .�al7leael/ -all so,,ellea}eetal■l ■u.ey:' uiuea/pwo�netuuunul.q.uunea■Quneaueu .negunuull .i'unui7i .slat .lr�a.IrLLUlatuu)l� �leLaalae.; 3■1 aa■]l. as aq� p .{tetl.aaeu.■ e .Ra1■.f��u.aMR!.a111a�. .eu�._ '��.a.■�1la.aule R.Rae..fraaa.t..aa.aRtetll ■': ,'are eu• ■//,ta■.■ ■re■ ■u■errs:. rll ■■ �ara.e.. amhvm7 aa�l. i.rer,�nn• —� — mas:nr sr■,e.r ■■.■ tuw.m.. - t/ _.. ..... e.b.e-aura e..n.sae ■manb1e4mMEN imua nu. _�"` ,i1l.u:itf ■aeiiitYll"rf lt. _ tineuneuuuellelaeerinea. — •Yii:�� r,t��iii Mi iii..1""I jl aiiiiui/.il .?.au....RR. Rfe.(■.lRu.{✓.R�! 1/11 •.■■..■■ewr1r ■//■■/1■ 1�areaf fR.i aJt111.11 e.m■a11me 7.rY:Yal.. IR.a■,a call _.'.. au iru lass e.�lc ■suu.■ peanlull nil :.:ear ■ urero� .. '. . _ _.,x .■flleaS i 3..s1..s.. 44 Yeas.. I1 .ir■ :�fIBit �J I®�/�in u iIt &.LI(III lllll i,u I t,rc u,.0 a u. ..rtl�1 niti'I�nttut[ttnl nu .of to ., lli»I .�;.ri,1111$IA II_I_.i1-I�tlrll�[n,i Utlt +iota, a a..r.■ of sr aaaa Tams as ■.a a..arIt ■■ aralt.0 a-a aarelta aRs as aaa.�..rr ■F _ a.ra..u■ F.■ ■arr:.It ■■ .� ■■�:■ .atm aw..X.m li ■ ■ ■F ������ - arm'a er t.a. ■■ ■rwa'sam■ r.:r �.fl���h�� �,"t�, ➢.m7lm:lrr� �': raeaeaar ri � .r—..-�. ■�a=a�r�r. as nmeFmr■ ■� fill c / ■ vim, ■■■.. ■■ ■..am • �np. s 4 FEW .II\ ..n.. nui i�tjrilt i»itn • WIll(t� .all li)trlt.lL;.y. i�r(u,»ntlu�,�1 1 t '. 11111,Ilu� »l:t �.*.t ota �irtn»Inrutt�tp>:!( ■..:'.." salnn .� � sq rra iia as wam as rr a1} Slttf Ya►iRallff,tt.4kil1S IRA I4 Ri ~{{ I +�„ �/rlJ,t;yl�tl/t►,Llll alu "'� Y1�1yi u. r,t + nurhn►lfi► 74t►reuii$ru�'1$irtll.i t _`+- a: '. lt.�t}1U 1t 11Li,ip+rttt 1��lIUULtl1lRtilNiitl��i�it r t}.ttt4lt .I,d,1/ :�J({►�R 11111 L1(RR,q.,n• ,t��i►1.Jt llr llllt4 .L71HRA l ,l.t I 1 1t11U ill 11,R,Il1lAt11A11 U4111t�����r.�l����il{�I�.I�IA R..tttlati ttlt-�,l��t • It'.I .y .RYiUL.t I,U 11•.f�fl..+lf._. -..:�" � .rt UR11[,LII Y�altlutUul++ .. .�tltttlu■H.a.a.fr f.+l .•+.u1}t�fa. 1 11,1!ll,[l lTiilt }.IfCRUtl.tllliL/r.11UrltlttLll Ull�►i!l(t� ltl.l■IlllTyyl �..; tltlff `•S/+1/4.■11 1URl.fla �tNi.,Ll11t.�.{tMIR U ufll tl}.U.1k�tkSo. In i.uult;a.1, e. t to 'l,l '� ICII s .� �, ■n fat ■■ u■■u■■ ■. �=r ■u■pau ■■ \aauu■ a.� _ Lu ••r aa9irau u�pu■ara�u.-. _ .. ■ar auk" ■■ a.0■ u ar �. ' anruai � s "now* on A CK�xf+' ■■�a�K -S� i■ K■r c G.Ir- -1 S�:w ■■ ■ na ■ ■■a(P■ll t �`� s���ai/t �i■��r.■.�■■s■ �f� si�y _ is9 an s� u■ 2ifi wi '1 _— o at} ■• ■■ xa■■ t4 a 1, ala■:■pa ' a■■ O1 11r aaa a aatr cua■ i-7 a■ t j it-1�9v S®� /■/' '�� - - • �/� ■�. 'tom z� �.,� �"' fir■=i■. �� �Y ✓� ■ illy■,aa iP■1:■i■"1 tie■■Pi t i I d \a•■ai r� V t Y J x _s[it9lrsJmm1 .�4er�„ --. Jam. r _�r4.` .:. s...... a�u eu n:u sett me• tmrt�emt. = wasu nn teu■u■ �!.: Iowa ■ *�.■urn a ...., .._. awr■■ lee■ �rr r.;.rter. L; ■oe■'iiitili iit■s■r.r ■■■ef■■Ioa uIo■■tub ti r1® �i ®,■e ete' _� t� 1[11 r++ t ■ 1111 wa\ta■Io. Iwo �111+ ■wart■t■ wawa l� �i li it �iii■■e� � t■t■m -t■ ICII I ■■ ; ee � c _l , I � t � a 1. ;, 9� -- =wa►�NWa All �w RA -CITY CWram:ANCHOCUCAMONGA T[17.t4 � lei[NG M 1, ExHiaTiQ{ -SCALE, Ask l 0 0 - Af Af- OP HOUIII�; :wip wor, a 7U mews per4c CUC OUNCA TMLEC PLANNU14G DMSM EXHIMTs SCALE, H-3�' I I 1 I r, ;4 1� w t t i CnY OF rmml . t a t r r s t t ,my+.' i BRI M t + �13CM 1 t 1 [] l 0 t 1 1 of � it +�+ J 1 ;\ lqKAN 21 CUCAMONGA NI EXH _ LE: o uw 13 € ; tf rj t t� 13it + •�€ � € Lam® � i ' i -p/'� -ems- �..--.1.�.- � - • ,l t` = 12302 ORANUM CLCOMA Ala �' 1`i'I"t.E= r r •- i r i j i . - _ i - I ' r I i 1 ; f QW ix rrEm' , RAMING MVGM EXH _ LE- �l-�l •Ni, °°-_I1111 (4 �! f�fw1 �I Baas i Mfrs, t _ e 1 � r -----y-- � �1 9 i r r r 7. cloo CrrY,,OFSRANCHO PLANNING DIVEM, f.�CH! 4E y • f 0 00 M t3 =- - �pg C . � r Cr- C* , � � `►� MANNING DIVOONSCALD 1 l i � I ih is I iMEER1► i fir•► or � � f OnrEml '7nx. 1=wi ssia'_ Aia �i HE Mtz �'a ` HE —son .1 0❑ � t o•ova vr! Q❑ pwm�� � 4 CIIW OF rmmiJvvss .. RANCHO- q- NII EXHI®'t'=. .SCALE, ti- ll �� CrrY OF rrEM, _ _ 4 ae DrISM Ht iAi e .l_ -r sar-� _ ��y;� I 1 r ' i aoa ; all ri , , l , a I t �r MAY OFt'� 3= . r x ' ^e t 2 � ' 1 j +k id ■hAY� Y I wA� 4 ' S r�r�, �„�ial �:■■ram,.--,.r,��l���� k A t. Nay k� N■■■ �x Y� �k r �r xs C S� � AR,. i 1 tE MatI 2� terTrrLEx - EMU rt -.t 1 s o el •� � tt s•ai I - r ' CnT OF ta} F NMi z„ F.3�d E E mw II CIO I cmc CITY f . OF A rTEM: too PLANNINZIXHi =' '. tE= �4 i I _ pe I rllRAM : �AP�dt9�I1i &ii iiE: •�� ��++ � � it j MOO) 001 -70 17 771 ffEm ,z 4 � _ -- i } W z1 II � i a 3 j IN AL- CrrY OF rmmtro .� Y IPA' XI isT. t I 1 d.d c- MOW mui EXHIMr Via. li Fl 60 r � r4_ ' t C3 M N..MK� w sabrr M ' Q 0 1 FMOWt `ELEVAT(QM - .+�Z.-a CIIT Ix rmm, i32-& RANt- i�- 1 iTnut- KAMING DIVlMqEXl1 t- wALE:, F Man V i.� claQ ' � R EXHIMM a i r^ s ' x r Am MI,EM --- - P- ®.- - --- - am_, 00 ja FRONt ELEVATION -� CnT C ° MEM, vim 4PRANCHD EXHi = - o , _ a i .. a ! � ! _Y � ��! "; 'ass• ID Pa t r ARK F.' a sift wrra unaa 'N 1 � Y� tMK A iyT7'}�` unaf aeaaas«aeusaxMf.,icu: �a� wro t wra A eavw. _. im" .. TRACE' UM-2 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN +igt;y.6t��,ttttNGS rA' a •.o � � s� /� r� ;aj'� e _ e All, - CITY (F GAI Af 1 - r \\ " �� "ter• '@, y- f,,,. �✓'�/ � ` 1, ��. 1• ~i0'°'•.w••••�'•"a w.e.w: ..;ti +�,�.`�a' '•�� !++.A•!.. NOM CITY CF, cam= �• y NEETi96 WTES FEBRUARY 9. 1990 SUPJECT. DR 12332-2 Attendees: Earle kruggel WIENVIEW ESTATES HOA Bill Angel Michael Montgomery Bruce Ann Hahn Wayne Carey Richard Gould J.C.C. DEVT.' Kurt Nelson Beverly Nissen This was a follow-up meeting to a neighl=rhood meeting Oat was held the week of January 29, 1990. Ho City repr ntatives were in attendance at the initial meeting. !.) We reviewed with the architect. the 'number of plans and elevations to be provided. Thirty (30) lots are being built. Six'(6) plans (D,E,F,G H and J) are being provided. All elevations have side on garages except for Plan F. All plans have two elevations each, with the J plan having 3 elevations (i.e., thirteen (13) total elevations are being proposed). Thirteen total color schemes are also being provided. The following is a breal.down of the unit mix: Plan Nuffber of TImes Built D 2 E 4 F 4' 8 7 H 4 J g ' It was noted that Plan-J occurs the most with each elevation/color scheme being repeated three times. i HOA Concern: They prefer to see a more equitable distribution of plans an a reffia U5ns. They are particularly concerned with the ''number of times the J elevation occurs. They also do rot want the sass el€vatior: and color repeated more than once. They requested that JCC ;provide additional colors to:provide more variety. They felt plans Were Leery similar in appearance and that additional colors would add more variety. r Meeting !dates-Fe6rua«y 9, 1090 Page 2 r, Action JCC will revise tha col or board and ettempt to come up witty more variation. 2) it wa, oted th`,)I 1 of the''30 lots proposed make use of either briefs 'tone. HOA Concern: They exuld prefer increased use of brick or, stone to prov ,e more variation. Action: JCC felt there was'<adequate use of brick and stone and that the s�uaco detailing on the other elev?tions provided enough variation. 3) The issue of sectional:roll-up garage doors was.disccsed. HOA Concern:- They would like to see wood roll-up ilectiona'l=garage doors on a T garage doors which face the street'. Action: JCC has nit yet determined what type of,garage door they will be using. They were fairly certein, however, that they could accommodate this request. I 4) The 28 foot, height restriction, -which ,was approved' witA ,the previous Design Review submittal, was dixussed 'at length. Yt.was noted that JCC's paoposal generally meets the City's requirement of 30 feet maximum height"limit as measured from finished grade. HOA Concern: They were generally.concerhPd with lots 32.36 which back up a—'na -existing h=_ds. They want these houses .to be.reduced. t.1 28 feet but they do hot want:this done by reducing the roof pitch. They generally prefer the 5:12 roof pitch and would be opposed to a 3:12 or, 4:12 roof pitch. Bruce Ina Hahn was especially cancerned that Lots 35 and 36-meet this 29 foot height limit. Action: ' JCC will attertpt to lower these houses (Lots 32-3Gj by 2 feat al:—provride an overall height of 28 feet.. JCC will attempt to drop;the roof pitch to 4 1/2.1j2 and drop the pad by 1 1/2 feet. "I 5) ire elevations which utilize brick or rock do not provide the material at the'base of the building. ' HOA Concern: They feel all brick/rock material 'should be used as a base material as we 1 as on the columis. . I, , PMetinq Fates-February Page 3 G r Action- JCC did not agree with. this acid.wiU`not revise elevatioris`as �t eif y" el ;they look"•:fine as they..;a're Trey.w111 bring. i "pictures bf ?p�reviously'bui;lt hors, ForrNview by the,"HOA. 5 _ Cone?union A set— plans ,were:left witfi toe- N0A so'they can revie�a em ur er;;and 'provide 'core�aents far the rse,;°may meeting JCC'."wi7i ,present;revisions at-the next meeting Which wi11 bii hel"d'sot tirtr before March 8;.AggG; .idt�ich. is when the:project,i`5 scheduled' fb the Oz sign 1", <,Review�Cogoi ttee. z , cc: Oast "Coleman r Otto Krautil s. 4( BPl:SS _7 -x r i i �r. S' A util N6 its: ,#fARC,N x 1994, SUBJECT; OR 123324 ATTENDEES- Earle,Kruggel a Bill `Angel� Michael °Montgomery. Havenv: eW Estates Bruce Anrc Rahn- HOA Wayne Carey Richard Mould J C C,. Qvtopment L Kurt Ne?son Dan Coleman, Principal;Yloyier f Beverly,:Nlisseri; Atsociate,Planneri . u � The applicant presented revised drawings which reflected the-,followingi; I. ;rare variety in color scheme Thirty color sch des have been provided (one for each, lot} ,rather, .than the, thirteen or ginalI presentedW 2. Houses on L6ts32-36 Were;?orered from .30:to,28 feet in'heigh . Tili was accomplish,edby.pharrgipg the,roofpitch,:from 5 I2 , 4I/2.I2 anon..: dropping the finish floor e,tevations by"appedximate toot. The Homeowner's Association !�r6ught up the fo#lo�iing additional concerns I. They would prefefr to see more diffarent�ation''6etw�e" ilia two A1dn ; Vs. 7ttey would also prefer to--: see mare, Plan .D's i:hMeughaut` 'the project since this is their Urges mode:, = , 2. They would prefer tik see m!s're,variation.in 'front yard<.'setbacks� 3. 7ttey would like to see the house,,an Ut 42'reversed to:av id' views .a`f the garage ddor from_ Tackste- St' 't. a° AlC:tlRt�r uvo, at s f _ 1p Ld Ca es 1► cc :-_t-a1 c _ _ - J n 'a Is 88 ®` 24�s '� Yl.•k.� s J2 .fi S37Z. Y;Slo it SIT. 3R v. CA it ar ' 25 20 30d Ay _ I e 30 V ,c's ® is Mr/ i3r t" K a � � E ` pf F CU pyypr�ee,� N ®fork Tm a 9 RESOLUTION NO. A. RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT N0,'. 12332-2 '(Lots 32-52 a. andi-108-1,16) LOCATED EAST OF HAVEN. AVENUE AND R3RTH'OF THE HILLSIDE, FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL :IN THE VERY',.LOW RESIDENTIAL; DISTRICT (LESS fTHAN 2 DWELLING` UNITS PER ACRE) - APN'; "1074-521-6 THROUGH`23 AND 1#4-531-1 THROUGH 9 AHD' 14 THROUGH: 16, 'AND. MAKING FINDINGS 'AN SUPPORT THEREOF. .. A. Recitals. (i) JCC Development has filed-an application for the, Design Review. of Traci. No..'12332-2 (lots;32-52 . 108-1161• as descvibed in the title of'this Resolution. -Hereinafter, the subject Design neview request is'referred to as "the application." Orr March 28, 1990, the. Planning Commission' of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application:' +, i All legaIr prerequisites to the adoption rf this Rt,olution have occurred B. Resolution. 4 r' NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and,resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of R-,ncho Cucamonga as follows.: " 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that'•ai1 .of the,facts set forth in'the'Recitals,.<Part A,' of this Resolution are true and correct.:'.. 2. : . Based upon substantial' evidani;e prsserted to this .Commission during the above-referenced meeting .on Marc n. 28,.1990, inclilding written and oral staff reports,'this•Commission hereb_ specifically finds as,fo.lTnwsc 1) That the proposed project_is consistent with the .5 objectives of the General 'Plan; aad 2) That the proposed design is 'in:accord with the objective of the Development, Code and.- -)the' purposes'.of the district in which {che site is located,; and 3) That the proposed design is in compliance with each Stf the applicable provisions of. the Development Code; and 4) That the proposed design, together iiith the conditions .applicable-' thereto, will not .be ` detrimental to the public health, ,safety, or j Y" P t welfare, or meteriall' injurious to roWerties qr iirprovements .in the vicinity. `!LANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION:ND. 'OR FOR TT 12332-2 - JCC DEVELOPMENT March 28, 1990' Page 2 3. 'Sased upon the iti»dings and_conclusicns set forth in parasr f, r 1 and, 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application. subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the.attached Standard Conditi664, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Pl•ann'.n'o Division: 1) Rock or brick detailing shall be carried through on ,,. the 'chirmeys ' for those elevations where rock or brick is proposed. Revised drawings; shall ,be presented to the'Design Review Committee for review f, <' ha approval ,prior to issuance.of building permits. 2) The J3 'elevation shall 'be revised to provide brick at the bottom of the.pilasters. lAevised.drawings shall be presented to, the :Design Review committee 'for review. and approval prior to tine issuance''of building permits.`' 3) The F2. elevation. ."shall .,'!be revised-, to.- provide additional rock wainscoting. Rock detaling" does not need to .be added,'at 'the'base of the pilasters.!' 4) Where river rock is proposed on .any,,elevation, 'Jt' should be a native material, 5) ;Special covers are. to be provided for manholes =r` located' within the trail,' 6) Local trail fencing shall match existing`3-rail PVC " fencing. Engineering Diviion:: 1} Provide special coverings (bolted on neoprene, plywood, etc.:a,:for all storm drain manholes located in local traiVs as approved by ,the City Engineer and Trails Conmkttee, I 2) Provide 7-foot-ie'de private drainage' easements j adjacent to prival,e trails, ,by separate.instrument, for all cross-lot,?drainag&� facilities. 3) Provide 12="or,"zfwide private storm drain easements for ;all pipes .which drain.; private, streets, by separate instrument. Provide an,Arrevocable -offer to dedicate these 'easements to tbe,: y,l which will not be accepted at'this time. z PLANNING COMMISSIOk RESOLUTION NO -DR FOR,TT-12332-2 JCC DEVELOPMENT )a IX March 280 1990. ,�I Page 3" �t to 'this Commission shall certif to the adory�Lion '• 4. The-Secretary _ Y_ of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF MARCH, MO. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF'RANCHO`CUCAMONGA BY: tarry T. McNiel, Chairman. ATTEST: � C Brad Buliers Secretary I,+'Brad Buller. Secretary of-•-the`Plannfng Commissi.ow of the City .iof Rancho Cucamonga, 110 herehy certify that -the:-_foregoing Resolution `was .duly, a•nd •` rEgularly introduced; passed, .and-adoOted.by the Planning Commission of the 'City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of,the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of March, 1990, by the,foilowing vote-to-4-If". AYES: COMMISSIONERS;Aft NOES: COMMISSIONERS;' c' ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS?: rr Wk 3BM-=t 11` Yr o I� E ag — gar YO ,�Z :.�t� - .8 NA Ism Va�i6, co 133=1 Val �x Via. pg y Z79Sg.yZI � ~= HPI, O� If— Y C '^Y 11 O 1:LO tl 3— $�j.� �13 YL Aj L f- 1 h gheal m 81 .^I%� �Vpasg .' Vo c�1 aP JA N aiM q ppeas ..3 ay, p�VO GN1 Yr Qom' L". _$� '.F� n�^ 6d �� zr.aE Asp gbh ��.� '{6 E `��.�L as 9"4 a gags sC�:4Ly_ rNV. g oV` ov— L x_8' 2. ^p M d�y¢xo yyM+y{{ Highs i aqQ •L SY I..NrI M, ZaY eas HIS ^O y Y � Nam o& m C Y Y CI E 1:j v MINN., it a ulRSITL ���� �� g� s� I -vv fa N r a� a� • ems. • � �a� r M Q M v f.L� • s f1` ® t i4 oss I'miszo an lit `� ¢ ° is-glib aia we s as _11 1_f �a � �� �d- gas-� �� e�� 1L.811s P g sitN v ®A i Ell p Amp Vq sy$ O O g 0 W `WS ®fl V qq$ tlYtlY q Pit s p N y m ap�L �a++gg Y � a�MU�p'@p, 11.111I MM•N a/1O ►22 ao %'.°.'a$ H1 su .�aBS L 7 iS P via A� �e Eos$ g,k a' 5" `o'5��.! b DES :! $� �' jig ]VIA f ". .. ..� zi3 - � :. a oilac a� -„� as r s • �y g �+ _ »YWI 94 ®Ltl ' Y Ypy=gNMY `V._3 y SR..a S-2 0. g.:N p..4. 6 M waQ iY..1►Y O®w.: M ��. R j NO' j j i•S�. $3»1 s-M�• sYGas ��-_ss Till V. $yA " Isit- s S at ��iC q w-o`�` `b=.It 'Y �wt'i8L -�.1 9 sN c. mo`. ►..cif ClJy 1 S C .i01 f q PI ® p O O D Y Y}a: _ 35 6 . s ffi9 �9�`y 13 2. 'YS O i 1 � 5� ri _ .. {0 Y_ .43 YE� 8s g wqgcea G • .r. Bay rM LL $fIpla�S it i pa �.�� t�Yg aj 3p 1��j � g jNp �- i3 jr$ g $ 3: �s i gyp"`" '16 SO v y M es Y_ WO W I t� N � Y m Y t a a ji8 w8.. �j®C��GI w :O Vi V� L `O Yid qy. '.Y. � •� S CW C�P O .lslt 'u q b m Y S 0 �..YLa 0Yy qpp �Ym p Qe YGiC [.��Vcy ��Y d a � � SINYPy i�$i .�+. �. you + Y` y b yqY � fig{ q`2 qg ff gg Li C y q Y4s.y® %«iw1 P �6 �'y-«. Cw M� YSm MpY�m7 Y«YL yuy wec 60 O—c. � q Mp p�gmY® ~ oy C:a +6 «g �"Ex Rl-as Cq p�,1po�6 yw.ap.�°6a �� :9 ZMA a014 Y T a _ �_oa � � �� �A� rt q� �� .+►�: $.. '°� hoc el. Fq 06 {@gyp+ 8i� �yQ1 efCj pw t V q�« by w ® y, Y qg® C yy Q�Mr. C� � q • �� Z�� L'�p. d �� god �m qd ,a w® �" O Y q _ a its; o. ® ® � 8 _ q' y a ® e � �Itg9��a � 4�;o am a $ w pQ 34 6 B..ae tie a® IYI LIV �- ��� �g� ksr t {{�1 p 1e 1"MO.VS Y ai— JL _ s O O M gg {p� �p'p �®y - :iN � w L q—'G a lr �'am � m!9 e a Yl Yi W..01 a 01 y AI 'N r QQ � y V pm l{►y p�q !Aq4.�. 9 y s MR O tl. G,. XeT.Q m g aaNn: v CL O • + wG l=sir w.4.{h'�S",M'' s N p�p Yy� Vr Nayq�'do«V $ �V f1{f P CPa b® d9 Qq• b® o: .. M YgCIL q�C CV � RRfr 4y� �F.1 wM YO M M M@ w $yV Nlg N=SCI yam + g� ®i a4 � 9 'iOv yY 4 °Ob 6 �MN (iFA R1 ypa 1!®06666V' lO.V V ml tll '® # � a �a M b3ss; ills 'S go 'gill I a ct r,L b tl� ii aAqwi•{Y�VQg4� !6 . .g AtlYY �g. Mrq® r U11 OsM Y(eid@ 4� Y6 �� 3ZE N tat ~ y « ®«o 4 ,BRIW U� _ q prY uil Ism M6 a „wWWW� �a�{.,..nw �, a: � fi �w • 44 d3 � . K yyq K� ygf. g® to 4 � < V 0.5 WVLi 1A {Y.$PF ki++ lw x N �ao � �$ $ Via$$ « m s 31k b E �• ON6 q _ tl6 pO M pq�dQQ�y 66� OS �U E�`:..0 Y.I fMf q lift IAJ ^N 4 yy� sg p .� sro C+ qyg� .. -QFA�p^_ `` !!> pNY �e 6i l�yb � 1a�� Ogtl 6:a� � �wK Yaa���v ms_, y� F 1,9 e N Lp'Y b _ Y'p y�- �q s' � p�,y pm`Y. �y:NC L -to j6 >f.I.: S tl« B fiu y. in `G Tlu Ye{V p> �Ij V ®: 6..Ep N� 0 tlgC.f� Yp p L. tl yy yy 7� S" P Li V P B 6 p ppL L'. 6T� mW or �N�Hii9mFF L" �� .,.."UtlqE� Is��.�I� N st . 3IC1_�. b Az av t .�B!7 u '. -CH e� �� roi_ A Aii g , S tl g.�h I N Yip d $� Y Lg " $� ■ q 21 lag j ILI 4 a p Rt a+ $°elk °s 2�.A+ s�L «� '2 Y0C ez6 u s � I ca u0°i W "3 LL ,s 71b ': «i N i • N s 66 :� Nm O b L is � ® a� s� . $e m d L O`5 L a Nm� C6OC� i v n � Y 9B I x'3®S r -- Q 8a g Zom� bm �— Iva Yj Sir rp toa Eli k •° � a -: -� ` C ui li y H p May YYii P. ® ^6 ed P d � 4=••" S SO HE ail. i I I I I I L i —CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIVION'GA Aj STAFF ,EPORT . � DATE: March 28, 1990 , J TO: Chairman and Members of the;.Pianning t' issluif FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Tom Grahn;'fissis.tant,'Planner SUBJECT: DESIGN. REVIEW` FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13812`-- Mn SOUTHERN GALIFURNIA - Design review of -building elevatiova and ietailed .site, plan for a previously approved tract map consisti.ng of 151 single family Jots on 66X acres of, eland in `the Very Lowe Residential District (1-2' dwelJ ng, . units` per acre), and'the 'Low Residential. District (21-4 dwelling,' units per acre,, .locat'ed north.' of', Highland" Avenue, south of- Summit Avenue, and ,west of Etiw,arda Avenue APN:: 225-161-35 through'38, 49 53., 55, and 225.-171-01,. 09,,: 10, and. 17._'. Associated with project are Tree Removal Permits 90=09 3nd-40=14: I, PROJECT :AND SITE DESCRIPTION:: A. Action Reouested: Approval of, building elevations, Grading Plan, Lan,1 cape Plan, and Detailed Site Plan."` B. Prcject Density: Overall 2.26 dwelling units''per acre Eastern portion. 1.58 dwelling, units per acre. ' Western portion = 3.50 01,01in9 units per. acre C. Surrounding; Land Use and Zoning`•' North - Vacant; Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) and County Residential 3 South - 'Vacant; Very,Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) and County Residential '3 East' - Vacant; Very Low Residential (1-2 AwdlIing units per acre) West. - Vacant and Single Family Residential; County. Residential 3 D. General 'Plan Designations`: Project Site - Low Residential and Very Low Residentia'C North - Very Loan Residential and Open Space. ` South - Freeway- East - Very Lq�i- , 7fdentia'1 West - Low.,Resiaen`eialrand Open Space t` zz PLANNING'`COMMISSIDN STAFF REPORT DR FOR TT 13812 WAFT March 28, 1990 Page.2 i E. Site Char ;cteritstics: The site is located o�n ithe north side of Hightdnd Avenue across from the Windrows' Village of 'the Victoria Planned `Community. The ht e south by the future Foothill Freeway, and i>n _the north 'by Summit AV.Pnue. The property slopes roughly, Four, (4)'.percent from north to south. There is;an,,existin!g sang�le family residence- 'located_ at the north est 'corner of, the site, that has d'been incorporated into the esign 'o.f.the subdivision. II. ANALYSIS: A. Background..-, A Design Review application, submitted byL Matt Southern Ca I ifor..ni4, .was reviewed.-and approved;;by the Planning Commission, on August 23,; 1989., Following �i :y approve"t, 'the applicant chose to redesign the project `and, once again, resubmit for Design Review approval. S. General: The eastern portion of the p i36tt ::site falls" under Very` Low Residential District ( 2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the western portion of the site falls under :-the Low Res :dentza I District (24 dwelling units per acre) 'of.'he DeveTo'pment Code: (see Exhibit f{All)o The applicant is, proposing, two. different produc"ts,; with'' a total of 8.'floor plans. ' In that portion developed under., the DeGelopment' Cade, :Plans 1 through 4. in the applicatonY. there are 107 lots: with'.4 flour plans, ranging 'in.-`size.from 2850 Square feet ,to 3,42^.: square feet, each . floor plan has 3 elevations. In that portion .developed under the Ed Wanda Specific Plan, P1'ans 5 through 8 in the application :th'ere are 44 lots with 4 floor plans ranging in site from ?` Of) square feet to 4,070 square feet, each.floor plan"has 3 e'leva 0ons C. Desian Review Committee: The application was reviewed by the Design Review . Committee p la,kesIey,' KcWel, Colemah,) .on February 8, 1990- The tommittee reviewed the project but did not recommend approval due to the following L concerns: 1. 'When siding is used as a' major des gn. eiement of the front elevation, it should be extendek, to all'- sides .of the residence: for 360 degree,architeeturat treatment. 2. )then siding is used as'an accanv material to .compiiment the major .design, material' (i.E'' stucco) it hould >be exte ded n as an accent to,al.i elevations. t 3. Slump stone is not an acceptable chimney mateCal. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT OR FOR TT 13812 - VA tt March- 28, 1900 ' Page 3 4, Continue , elements from the front' Pl,evations to 'the' chimney,.i..e., red.brick, Tiding native stone, etc. The architect revised the architecture based upon design issues. presented ;by the Committee. .'The. Committee' (McNi.el, Weinberger,,-Coleman), reviewed .the revised plans on Marc 1.h 89 1990, and. recommended 'appro4il subject to the., foilovl ng conditions,•' • 1. Material changes should ,.be made to'the chimney 'siding on the fallowing elevations:•' ;. aA Al stony bA Ail siding 66 - All brick' 76 - pop-out the brick base. 2. On Elevation 5A, utilize a consistent element size., between the box-outs surrounding-therwindoivs'and the post at the entryway. = 3. Multi-paned,windovs should be utilized or:,,tome windows of all elevations. D. Tree Removal Permits: Associated with the development of this tract-:are 'tree Removal Plermits 90-09 .and 90-14. Tree Removal, Permit 9049 proposes the removal, of 14` Eucalyptus trees :and one (1) Mulberry tree for street-, right-o€-way impravements'and . house plottings within Tentative Tract 13812. Tree Rei0val Permit 90�-14 proposes. the removal of 'approximately : 3.0 Eucalyptus trees ,conflicting with street right-of-way improvements within the Summit Avenue alignment from the west ride of'Etiwanda,Avenue and the east side of Tentative.Tract-. IM,12. Both permits propose the removal of. trees identified for preservation by. the Etiwanda Specific 'Plan (Figure 5— I3). Approval of this application` will `necessitate issuance of the Tree Removal, Permits. This .Development 'Review will require replacement windrows in accordance with the Etiwanda Specific ,Plan, at 50 linea'i feet of windrow, .per, acre. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent ..With the General Plan and Development-Code.. The project wi'1l not be detrimental, to the public health or safety, or 'cause. nuisance Or significant adverseenvironmental impacts. ,In addition, the proposed use and r 11 PLANNING COMAISSION'.STAFF REPORT OR FOR 7T IB8I2 :ldATT March 28; On r. page 4 Site Plan, together.w Ch the recommended 'cono`itions .o*. approva'. are in compliance, with appl.icabie _- visions o't'the beolopment Code and City S,?andards.` IV. MMEND IOy: : Staff :re,commends` that the P7anaina :Commission app ove Design. Review for Tentative Tract 13$12, ;throuOh:th ado tio` the attached Resolutioh.and. conditio'ns.of.'appr'ov.al, Re pact_ ly' ubmi d,, `d rt �1 Brad u`l er, ` City P nner BB:T :3s Attachmerttsr Exhibit: "A" }site ltilTzaton -'T'ract Map Exhibit "B" -'Detailed Site,ti'lan Exhibit "Cis - wading Plan Exhib.it "D!'' Landscape Plan Exhibit-, E"' `.;Bdild ng Elevati, Exhibit "Ft Flcor'Qlans Exhibit "G"'� Equestrian ,Envelop`e'.Plan Resolution of Approval .withStanda;rd Condi: JQns �t Y 3r i t-t 11F J �Y I �, x+ «� • =wore + 1 � —_---- -��+-r---,�-� �,-fie*-�.-P•. ��` ~<J�---•y �.... 1 u R n sr : • - ry w..!ic.+ .�r ,1 a++ Via..aa.. � • - . ' � of T s.• a;r�i �® o"n a u-�'_q u w .� �-- � - -: iF�qq N! Y Q r• W a—vl met •��--�-.�� �- r��. 5A AWOL —011 t i • O •t • a� t .t Mz �•.q CITY OF, IANC 10-CUCAMONGA 1- (tL PLAN R�I�IG D1 ION 'I�Ti: � ! rIm " � � r�■■ilk,�•I/,���® ,� `�� � � �, ---- 11 i rs wmw -map No O`er►'®��1�' Notj ® , lip a . T ll 1 r � � moo* �r w�F G k I t. ' z r�ays.a.yja:���scagt� a r�y��•�',�gea�a�S®n���r i'. FF __ �v 'ry•`w �jl fir, e: IT � . r� y I e. 1�I f A S _ � t i�Yisiyttari�JIM.;Tl; wca`��",i#_ jvr��ksaase_as,7 e 'N� v. a i � �`- 1'��'`���✓,.Y� T � r,;i"" � Eta i i ii1wm i JIM t MITI r �1� ;. ME �� l•� ��j� l,fi3iilftr{ Mill I It i ' ? }t n OVA r '.rt ,Rr� `' �S�Ic`rse;•'- ��i/s,�d'�l'�'.(�..vCt}a".,, ..r. ..:.r�x...X..�,�.'�n.. .'`�1,, i , Yj if asv.,aen.s��9 MW Ie i � x 9' /.�^�.. a hwar�•I -+--', � +C�s.nic... to ;,� �: .t' t • — � 11:�Q�i�!�►:'� ..1 .\ 1 4 I I,♦hME �� 1h fs.w� �' .nw.■� .. AI IR i 0-1 ia ' r �, �r■nas�'rr�ireiw�lnr��asFr�u.�,iiwrk�� ����r►'� li e tw IS;� • a f! f' 113 I' !:. r11{{ ,t weo Le It ;�.'� �-� �I�v��cat�i an� • ' 11(A I� lio it III ! T 1 f S ° !pptii° a! !33 ( 11°i3�a!° soy ! � °t • i� 0° `•1s��1 t li�aii 1! ;�[;F a lE =t•t 6�$t�l eii;=,;llie p�1!�$�!i e!� E js 4 d e i ,.;! s 1 1;a 1,a jj 1{! �� E�i9 ° F!!1.4 1 t a !• s1aa a!i�,1$lit fi °i ° fit, l x !� i C i 1-$�el ��° # � it z r cFs 11! , t g 1•a $a:l 1 i.a! a i; �"� '�_•� !•°'! !�41E1 ;° � Ic$�: !$!i�� a i � {, • � 4r.°c.'1 c !� �iS�il�l�l!$ °,ai i4$•��dS3 11 i e � l� � a 1,a�$���1, 4 li i E g i !■ � i°eE t :■i-.�!! i�p'4 $Ill;ti!� , 3�ltd!4 p i ,i ce_, ; l;li 111� 1 �1��!�ii: !i:� i,•q� 9�$li! !i � �{�° 1'4 ° a'a°(z 4• : 1 t ct 1 i [a: i. !d xE�l4��:4 1 lj �a ;� $ a� jxtY;el !!; s t al.t(z ;'1!�{;;ltli I °"'.°!14 tl x E(ff !•3..e+! !!' £ ill Rif ,Si I ^ll;�! ! IllallllleAaa g ce i 1 z a e e x 1 °yk€u°:1mi ! ! ° ? $ i lie 0 L Ri �a ii4i� � 3 tj ! a�lE�l�etl�ii9i[lalEae9l9il:�elEl�ilti!!RIl�9lsltt6��i9lfli��lla�al1i31�!l114 �,Il i tElii��ii •�( i i id {{ is { i i £ i. � d t ; a 91 it'll a ° c ° 1 t t � ° - ! pp ``tillC a ,t, IIFti,1aE6 I�Iji4lit 9 FI 141� .It t i`11 i t13 i at`���3' at ��� Sh ��, , i, r 1 tl it � f�� � i � __ I j �,� � � rr .�i c � 1� s �. � i � �� — is � I � �, I t -�� g ,.��. �� 4 , \i1 \ 1 F•• . :FT- fit t' 1 .g i �' `° � 'ate � - •a��o�si � � 01 t� � i Y , if ai'�r a ;q g F f }MI a 4 � i x rs 1 + , t Y F ♦t Y � i r=i Eit a 3. .� ! r L�j, • 24 Aq Avg - g�.its �� � •.�� _,f � s, - ;� I � J r a: ,1 jail, {.j e' loll Nk Al i y �� �-_ •,�`�s'-arm' ,� � n��` �.�. � y��f0 r �A y 1• k. t i lz I it t � -MWT 1 Ali sIPAb 1 z e ti t �' 1 f C } K Til �1'4 T 2 •� J Erin �� � �- - --- ��•['� � ��' - � � it . I r. emu i x' •f� �t'� � a!'• �� °Vic" •o' -� i �® MEMO IQ 51 n�o�7�■� _=ter_ r��'"�y :y� ,} L � NDS�APE CONCEP`f PLAN lll�� !911111�< 5 ni Z _ice � ?_ � . � is ■■ _ iVill� ' R `I 1 e :-.^i3 z gs F; s 4 I � Ul EB EB o j Ea t� s_ �t e- s e p 0 u� V Y C Q - s . 40 i r lu .�� fir ��e A �o I 'V ti 2 g II , ...cam' U 8 W ¢ ,u t, ,> ro I•;r1.,7,7�� l��lip�t�"�U�[yyu9ti f l�� I.h1 � s IR `RIB i,�I !�! 1i1� in 1-f 11 1 ifl i[i ±� _'_!!'' NI NA!, S' 7 171 : Y l/ r1l1Al ; it 74, �e 4� 1 yb kn3ki a--. S S 'son 1 U r' u■ tii �;,�i�i ■ram �4t a / era n t ur Now All a n■■ ... kt r i r s � �s O V �O n c Y m o � W W ik nwil , F o � W �_ k !t �� ��k► i ' 6 � II w� ^o o: V- i ift Ea 1 CIOR ® 0 6 _ 1 i W i t-L ■ 4R k ` 'f Lr�ll�tiyt 'ILLLJ�'S 1, jinl ..S. rtrl} a• �1 tit oil 1 r�f'tt•'��(jt�iT i.W _ I till '4 liili�t� {laue� x I � .ram •��N � �. fib• 5 w� �+ ft 'jj' �•Ins '�7° t r IK' , ti1�t Aiiw .1 I 011!If 4 tthl; 1 ��tl't 14I,1 1�1 '1,11 stain I ILi ola; �Itltl•1°:1 ���I�( >;,� _ - a§;y41 LIl)!}Is� ilil�' Ili iy��t r �' "�l Ifr! � -.:a 1'IL'i� i'��jl� A1tl�• n Pr,., " I , 111 un�4+'1 tillAll % ® a ■<�� . < < m. � � z � A � � O \ �\ « ~ ��. \ . • �\�/ . \ � \■ � . - \� ] �. . �. . 1 ?.IIIYi mil e ;k= P� O ;ptmnntni ��•��i`�� (n � C= ry.. -- •;, uivrtillrn aim i��l����, t � � h 7 4 L om �S. I • e, r � �'flli/III�1/I�IIII�1I11 1 4 �N S , f x tin.,i MU e'Sy#[[. Egg ,' ihtt , [iS X 1:1j {jai Ni j {.�fn �P 4�1y, Al SI A�111 4 r ill z• o i r � � .y t 7 �j � a I 4 1 tel: ED z LLI Ls 0 r o � 0 r Q 'Q �a a w l�J 3_ 1 ,Ao. :�l�II11 en pQ9l i f vm b n III ' ti=lAt#1i1�u�I A 1 t� i r llrll Au .17 it ;■�,�.��at to u ilia €> 1 ' fYz jalr,i,l} �!�11pr , Y ��f;r• [I■il7 If�` t i � ' .jj''. j�, � V717�41 L,��)��}�Ill��'?\ It)a 1■ 1.} l.fr1"YY`S a� S �Cll,�,i il■ yl r.y4�,IIlYx.. r }Y,. �� :��i[lr7lili"�*��JI t. O t u�';.:a?etar, V a7■°f ' 1' ■ �''++F 1`^"'>�'�>, ( �1 ,frj li■. 4nf', 1 r T�■ •�■ air�97 t t�a� rs[[I 1 r IIH} i[ ,s 1 i■1 ror a■,r,[yy,�. il■iim i I !st1 it, Ii, [flil Ii ��■ �i��[■��■7 '��- liliri�}��i�{ � i�;7ta�fl 1�+}eiui1+ 6 ■ ■i 11� W �� �� ru,'t 1 tti. 'irAl�l,llailSlll� ■ l l,` - s N!i y! s c:; r f r I lI I strr y Ili,of}■ r.�„ s, 1'i��l,Ia . �drsx[■i 0r■ s f i fillt rif� �➢1.;:. ■[,r'.aft/.rti �� S lil•1 11 ����tjlf;it Illt+vf!CY�Ji'+I,�i'+ IIiI7li3�1}' 1 f r.i�y7F r,'�Z1t 1 I4it}x;rs �h 4u ■i(■,[I+�Y-,� ■ �$��� .. h�Iyl�1��� 7�l,gl�t wmvl r '?,tV■3II IIII ",�' {[iri i*t! ar.;, Fj flFi�ell:'��S�■dddffe Is:lrli!!Ai �m f Lj I, ems ■ Irk lr=[I a:r=� r .�;;ac ke., �•�'t.j ���!.` �r �, � thy£�•. .'>C,''.,'f r _ \g o i e a N m W ' J uj cc C k ® ill c 1 y !'f i g ` IlltVI tt' � t'��1i111�111t I111 11i1C�� _ = it IBC A �4{{t1111i14�tfi7� a1�F "k.l� fjj�� rr j - � uuuf{II aaa = i !K rmaw' e 4 m Q . s no h l a i IS cc d E3i r v 1 WWC, W a- UJI fir. �11Iliillif 71111111HsiWu yala,cta�� ' l t S'iSjty \� i y l t ly ,�y� ILv /1'■ �' �t ►►1110ty luaiguhlt �rl:, 7. ';'1..; 1• �' 1. a 11 ■- F�'1, /S�� 3� lit- tlat�,l'1; i��is `` f� .i. t±t�a4 r�Y �_�` 4� ■'. Ir,i 't.. ® � ?�'1 '1'llN i�'j•�tlr ap l A t 11 +a 111 �1►?j[ 4jS` iaR {, A 5►�:rS � �- �SI .'L�a�y lass < � • �i �gel > U+ .1° � "';`. [ a c 1 vt a tt • F aijf s,as ,1 Ya ''t � alt7a���ata a ► aG ji t.�� Ira'{t{I' t SIT ;t< t f+nii ii 1�IL '<'� nunmyl .■. 'ran am a�fiYlu riY'�dlfy... tt■ rr`n ■A, r.. tl.■ L—r a�■@' i 'lAe �� , gel o i nt x, Jump- flh to no 1�fmunnnnm111°�I�IOII �� ���: +` � i�w ts^ 0 , R }'11` m>r imtis,_ '41��11 �rl amin T�� 11111tilllllll ® . WIM h�All i�f111111}}Iltillliilpilill�fllHlil�IJfj �'11II j11yy ,� {l�� � ;, ;� COMM sm � ,r Nil +!!I!1 "macM114,' �.�11 �ry i utY■ b bi �d,,lma �jjII tttii�p} I �Y-t�:! six +1 14 rt Ht +jjS i r ,31!�IhII a 'S ` t r 'i! y•f��v: \ � t•j'st 1 ,,h �,• � .tsaltl .1T. 'Ili �•�� �1�it� IM yt �■ ��'�Rry 1 L:t� =�: Is as as ��'�a_I,C����1 .,,n�lll' � � �41y1�r�eC ��1 �I���I�i•�' �'`~+' 51 1 ! �s i• ii t: 1 HIM iris' F rriai rr�� err It iu{ a f k � yYF�RR' fI "S� a f I was 1�� v''T 4 V',Mr•fll'1 f,... J fiGi.4U11 � �Y ,, H!! �Ii �a r r 7K�i #o, aN rr,fe It�.I Ell It's e 1 �j, off �' r.Y Y IrM� ��' l;1�11111 '�IIII� win rr - �r = i�lllllllll �� �I�ttlttl4 1 llp s' = p ytHnc mm{L \ ��4K��`. �'��N :�!I nor• n 55 R� nounM,. x R l i� Iilll '� �uu,rl /�I�11911 A L"• nf; � r 119� 2111 � Ilillpl -+-J ! .. ,Illlllllllllllllilll III , ' ��� y4�� , �� ' I �•••1�S 1 II�r ®is e�1,91181�ti6dI111111;yr � n i y l- alf, q iireilip- 1iI .777 .;t t a ��} � ✓.;= � � �� ram;,". f�l�t3s I h � ��Urt •'f' '� .„, �'` ; � III t .�1� �Il�i\ cl�; ■s. 3Y fS !Ah S} 1 ���, rai�,P? IYI ■ ff.y�..a1u1► � v i t-:�'t e{ ��,t,fit:':�• �`�.1l•sllf®t r its- itINK `s ® 111 ttlHll�� rIS■m�. m ! 1111 I'ely JimaJima WO Q� Ali ' �a`i Ji■r8 �� �Ir>tei e..■ �,hill L! Ivee � DINS F nsai� nulil ! 1 tlumufi O � RUN ;� � x1YrrHtn�,-� I��ICIIfi.l ��IIF�Ix��h IF hi � r xt�• w`' f i i M }} Of Jim; r`+111 an Hill1a't �lf.el mom tggquqnU m � tgrltl�® k �f1111F`' si If ■■'-I tt i ■1■4�•t,�. � - Ao L NU3HlrMl l� LHaLQot,:nv4n`o`3, o1Uea�9os�wer3r aPaAnIOMaIN 1oSsa. m:=Voj oxfrui •.• , it e r` r _ a;1 ■ - el Leenvaar ■ '^'vi aeaeeer. �a1�Ata1 vaavo. �wv�•�.F--- �_�ye roe irR�uwl r f I va: eserf�- �tev�reav�� �II eul � ,, RR s , ii ' I rout i � Illill�r ,��stia;�4y.t®: Y■aeauw■■re1 � .' ■s iis ��[ YF... ��� ii � '�' rf` e�■i. o�{ ii � 1 J,�U iiwni A t In .ems— :1�/.• 1llltll lUlu _- LO CIN61a�17V7'vowmvi�nS oNONVU 1 II�kiOO 1 Nd3N1fiOS sxiNn co►-ZtBCI 1oYE1 11VM dONM SIV03NOIS c ti h ci h •r !"' C �Y S• } -.'•-.�.. �„cam ... ..��.. .. r rrEM.-rr e aw rr/IrrrrYr � rerRrrRRrr rRRr mmum Ift :Rrr■r tam air. mis teiY.Yl ' T' Rr71!■bIRR RRRit{f111f M.,� ( tt�� ,e�l(MlrarrrgllciiRr ,rr 'OiI' `__,; '.: ,.,•..�rrswrrrarrRrarr�R rR �, ...� A ,. -: �,, rrtrRRrw— tw„ InNowa�s rrr am" _ ■ ■ r rrR �"� �`- �� i! 1, • 1YO " y' 4 4^M 141 fit li ■ �. 3: - !`�iaar iei■ i�i ...,aear , nu ri■ ■e■■uAa■r■■r i•u . ■ T � `�■rrtA ���YI! • e■urt�i fain®c:�'.'L. ■■oleos►Y r �,,. :'- . iiin .. 'Fl��l nuoll ME Iw= m■■■awn:v® iiiie'`�ss�'i�iieww���II .I S■■■•d.yl,,.�i■iRC�. >:o■u a u vu■■.■i . ice,. vura■r■ ry., 5 1 � t Vtuvi*411v*'t amndafi3'Owaave � Ell SIM tr �ZII fA Z c ' c 1 _ 3 � l t'd �I vl voa{�a'roNoavan?�NINV O'Llms1 tt!^L68et 10tld1 j^ , S33�SS3 3itlfl3P1015 4 l tel: K T f i t Vfl fO�!`ttd� _ u�cvaaa�i�Va vseea�vaei7:® Own LA 'Pa�' ''SSiHrti0-L6W�[�'1�1ftl1 r � ' ,I i1r 1 R� ^� I.16•a � �1 E. �r h fl n r 3 c� 1 1` 1 __ 1J.VM� � � s.�31tl1S3�1dJ�R�iJ.L^s 1 > �. :• { 1 ilv � Jt T :uuf Wmrr — � Y■ir -• +� ui rm �I Lt�i�r ■a y■7 ■■�•Ytf1 iimj Sf�• r as u•A i rff•r■�or7 ' ■ � ME No LLer�`a{ r rm.rf r a' ■ mm■mmgs! • ..t.r� � mmuno st � mrPur M ME 'avmfff�: L!; ffae ire rri H � �'r fra Rmr' frfmam:t ,■4amt�u ®� epgmuN � mn!+aswp >w t• Y $ a 4 � -- � r a x Y x♦ f '! i RESOLUTION NO. _ A RESOLUTION OF,.THE PLANNING.-CSOF THE CITY Of RANCHO, CC�CAMGNGk, 'ALIFORNTA, APPRDUING DESIGNrREVIEW-FOR TENTATIUEv)TRACT NQ, 13GIZ, THE DESIGN REVIEW OF-BUILDING - ELEVATIONS, GRADI::'f PLAN, LANDSCAPE PLm, 'AN DETAILED SITE PLAN FOR 15'if SINGLET FAMILY L'OTS':ON .66:7,7 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED NORTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE,' SOUTH OF SUMMIT AVENUE i AND"^WEST OF ETIWANDA ,AVENUE `;IN THE .VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DIST,nICT, (1-2 DWELLING UNITS;' PER'. ACRE) ;•AND THE 'LOW •RESIDEN� AL DISTRICT'.(2-4 DWELLING:,UNITS °PER ACRE), ANDIMAKIWFYNDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 225= 161:-35 THROUG.N,38, 49(, 53, 55,•AND 61 AND 225-171-01z` 09, 102 AND 17. '` A. Recitais, 0) Watt Southern Cal iforn is has, filed an application 'for the Design Review of Tract No, 13$12 as-,described in the "title' of this Resolution. =Hereinafter, the subject.Design Review request it,referred to,as "the epplition."ca Harch .28, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application: (iii) All legal;.prerequisites.to the adoption 'of r this Resolution have occurred; B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE,. it is hereby•found,. determined and resolved by,the Plarming Commission -.of,the'.'City of Rancho Cucamonga las.,follw 1. - This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of:the facts., set forth 'in the Recital s,`Part •A,;of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented -to".-this; Commission duringthe above-referenced meeting on March 28,.1990, including°`written• and. era9 staff,reports'..this Commission.hereby specifically finds as-fbllows: x' 1) That the proposed project is cotisistent`'with . the objectives%of the,4ne-W Plan;,;and , 2) That the proposed design: is, in accord with the objective of the Development•.. Code and' .t,he Etiwanda: Specific Plan and the purposes of.the district in wh'h the;site is..located; and ;3) That the proposed design,'is in compliance''with. each of the "applicable• .provisions,- of the ` Development' Cade and ,thq Et:iwanda Specific Plan; and - PLANNING. COMPiI55I0N RESOLUTION-NO., OR FOR TT 13812 -` WT S0: CALIF. ._ March 28, 19,90 Page 2 k ,4) That. Fthe proposed design, together. with the , I conditions ,applicable, thereto,. will .not- be detrimental to 'the pub?ic health, safety,, or we!fare, or, materially injurious to, properties r or improvements•-in tfie =vicinity.._ 3. Based:upop tfie. findings avid conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby-approves: the application subject-to-each' and every condition set forth below and in the-attached Standard Condition`s, attached hereto and incorporated herein,by.thi's reference,;' Planning Division: �y,} 1) .-All Conditions of Approval f4rr'Tentative.Tract- 1:3812., as contained �n Gity.Ce-inci. ,Resolution.' 88-699, shall apply• 2) ik1tprial; changes shall,be`made 40 :the chimney s q�ng'on the f6llowing.•el.evations . 5A-- all stone 6A a1.l ;siding 66 - all brick 7B Pop-out the brick base-` dS ' 31 Elevation 5A shal1, utilize:-a,:consistent element= size between the box outs., surrounding.` the w ndows and the past at the entryway 4) Multi-paned windows shall be utilized on some windos of all elevation 5) The saliid masonry wall along Summit• Avenue, Vintage privet the,;',perimeter ' of lots, 144 G through 153, and corner side yards along Stable; Fal l s iI P.venue and BI ue q :Grass, Avenue sh` be -ce,i' '- 'd of a split ;face block with native sti�ne. Pilasters. All ,other. ,perimeter walls; corner side yard halls, and, return walls.`shall be constructed out of a split face block with .` split face block pilasters: . The native stone pilasters shall be 24 inches• square A'nd the >I, split face block pilasters hall be lb.,.jnches square. °Tjlasters shall be .spaced a maximum, of , 40 feet'. on .center. 'The;mortar •shall jbe, flush'- 'r x+ith, the. block and; shall match the block .; color. The design, materials and-color, shall be.sub3ect,to._City Planner revi¢w.arid, approyal., " prior to the, issuance of building permits. Material '.samples. sha,1T be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits., 1 t r _."7:3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO DR FOR TT 13012 - MATT SO 0t.#.'-`" March 28, 1490 4 6) The P.V.C. fence_proposed along Vintage Drive shall be.a two-rail fence. �r ; 7) Equestrian trail fencing on Lots 20 and 3, a`d3acent�.to Vintage Drive, shall' have. a solid, Spin face block wall on the street std_af'�:he ?,trail el�sement and the. lgdgepole 'equestrian fence.• along._thz .'interior side• oi• the. trail easement.' 8) Front yird landscaping is, required;on Sots 1 thrgup 44 and sh411 include,' at a.minimum.four (4) 15-gallon site trees on' interior, lots .and: eight (8,) 15:-4a;Tl6n size: trees_cn cdrner lots, seeded groundcover., and `a permanent irrigations system ;to be. installed' by.'.the developer prior 0 ogcupancy'a Thf requiremen.�'. shall to iri addition: td, required -._street r',zesoc- Landscape plans . shall .be :subn1Itte'd .for ,Gi'y .Planner review;.-and approvil mprior .to the issuance of`` build irig'.permits Engineering Davisionr { 1) All conditions,of Tentative Tract 13812 shai,l apply., References `ta "C'". Street shall read , Vintage Orive and 19P Street is Row Bluegrass Avelue on the.standard Conditions.. r' - 2} Driveways on do, rner lots'withn:blind right. turn movementsr shall be located: 'as far from the` intersection as.possib.le', Whvte the dots'are narrow. maximize the; :�eparation by,`narrowing the. drive approach, width; °to 2b :feet at` the, rsight-of-dray,. with `a 'traiisitiaR, on, the intersec.tiort side of :the orive►ray. I'ci particular:t ry � hdr e 7a), Narrnw te ive approach 6 and .` 85i jand U b) Both .narrow the drive .approaches, and reverse the driveway transitions% away from � the intersection side. .Lfg,ag&.12f, !2� 3} The maximum residential d'rive,appradch wjdth ?s< 24 feet ty u .. PLANNING COMMISSION RiSOLUTION NO. OR FOR TT 11812 —,,WATT $O.<'CALIF. March 28, 1990 Page 4 4)" Slopes within.City maintenance areas on Vintage a Drive shall be no stee e�p ~ than 3:1. Th�,use of retaznIa4 wdjlls in City maintained Widscape areas shalt be approved by the City Engineer. 5) Lola?, equestrian trails adjaceKr' to public ' streets shall .be located inside the perimeter xall�t� Air 'local��;trail cro,ssings;�;0, Vintage Arive�,h *fi be 1ocaie at intersections., 6) Crass gu? erra tie eliminated where storm r r1 _L O 7) Landscap:irig9�<wa,�s anr, sToots within the.;line of sight,rfppf ' ntersec- tons rtali -be;; subject;to. the applpva�� ��i".the Cjty Tr'..,ffic`Engineer. In particul;di-,> se side yard wayi onLot 84 s-hould be placed ceT�znd the' Blueg`I aWss/Silver Saddle, intersection line bf�sight.. , 4, The Secretary, .to th is Commissiony shall certify ,to the adoption of this Resolution. d APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY;W7. MARCH., 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA' BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: _ Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the; Planning Commission' of the .Ci.t!t�,--Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby .certify 'that, the' foregoing 'Was,,,Auly 'and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the v,an"ning Commission` of.;the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Plannina Commission held on the;28th day of March; 1990, .by the following vote-to-wit:' AYES COMMISSIONERS;: : NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:.' IL peiH � wvY¢giIle all � �.6wwq 0bg`r �N Y� 4_ � �L CV4 4.0•�40YY�rM I C V Y 4 A O Y V gYew y .y J.y• + `d L 4 w N Y �V p^ 6`Vs 1S 1.• N ^� �'.� N Opp •6�� $Z'$qgeA3 •• v...LapVS+ O.' '�Y '4� gA V� _N 3� °,.L «YY�4" �`� •Y:_¢0`0��.q1 �6 �V d V� �paap¢¢fjfj,,R'Nfdy�v{COY � / NV &. L tlG4giq 4 ' '^�Yr+��C a3Y� C NYI� ! W�� �� N� O •4 �-p���y Y ."IY Q BY= f \,�( NYb NY y T�49 6tCYNYV�'N. !1 m�.✓Yam+ M i gg g N� I } t[ Zia W g Y 'I®N Nw `r� w r 4i a 71 $ Ail a Q dc _? 5Y�&�3o�'.. YsS:;Eb'� da� �6p� w � �•^ry*c $� vr.�@+ 'SA Y as �.Yr�� g$`�� ®YM��rr m.0�� Or.S y� �:o '.q ��yaaa���� Q}♦� TL YTL L $•+..YH_^ 3.YY 8i� 4gO� V1. _.=, a ^V8` a p ttt �■ s�` Q �� Oki1�•.6mp.Y+_��:gai $; �aN• o'� { 3 C Y C f d if 4 4 IN- Al I �a b1 j r -2 S�{d�tl 9 i4000 t±�� r^�.g -01 6 yob S s YY y o alb n tr $ o~i,% Ir» a s�P a.� ^o ^gga M �asei 9Ma� saMs r� ��s �� gc s ��&�' —TI `ggsa�� � s « S �1 in SS, all poij i.V +fig` $.e g �� 3u®® a `� oaoo��rs n..3 lit-�R. ice. C Y YC �ajf+ Y"NO eee L= 83 Fax u v G i� Zal " u ao Val � by �. VC pw6 i L I. OV�r8MC8 `O x0ax GLp YG YYy C•' �f� 9paO 6D� • V O�,•rr O� qr■i qyY ZJ 1g$�o$Y'wi`�'$4 Z. Lori oL I ew.: GYY'?a..'W»u �L3ways^»j' s a® QQ ip YY YY yy F�gQ OO � of f., o areZa L y i Y1 aL w,Mq Gw }d M ` afg rr6 — s gga $ggg ageg'ssg O J ^ s g Y p v 6$' aN 2w q lb G•=.� f a y�Y � �� VY � �Y a0$� a i ®_ 12.5 if its. an ts Li Wb ®�.. : ffi'_ ��,� �. 3 �$ a�ap .fie �y �. .322 K W ci � W i N Poll p Y V layp ww .pp G Y 6 x 9 a' tl wH6 pq �.r G aWp �$WYi Y 0 �3: Y P" g m `s & Y VON 7V ..Y aOVYy s$ ).. 3i 3A. jig p p y8 'Jiv �! o32 �..i� Ila- TL �r A1 , p, raIL >k gyp/ ee pg a pg� �L ®" N;N 2•Y _ i i p f. Al Z. all fit 1J.5 14 rl ZZ N. MIS i ai is r N N re v }r,... g $ g ��� PCu Ell i te LS b1z i 8 a 4 8 aVV4 4 ��05= .2L+ 4 IT it 4. e4 f. '^.gg g d Z Y P 4�,�. C &.a•f �N p 4 L 3 G 4 V,. <o�u&ogia 'd` a �°ps q. Y i y■. a. pep vP. �. q� �v V 1Sv lL{ a � •r g, Y �� Y 1PeMY usz LSwM: R_ P O ZN J�v a V3 Y 6 3S.r all N 6 YG S^ ��C O 3.,, 3:� a•C� -jig bs i� -" 3 Ge@ At I ya . Rio e' ss �� ® a 'wag® � ®Y_t� rig3ei8 8, $d S � T® S sit .�•� ~1 iv 28 ` � �s a -" a 3;�g� I ear p_ 1 ^S_ =gj S j Yd aIT i1 a! e e ��3 AJ O O O,V O d, a�L � � `t O C S, � y � Y I �7� �.• �L»Z' Y $ �»»o in aa. �o ` ar ". s . `� O>�C ate.4A S C� 11 yy ppMN N �p. �yyw0 C$ d OC Ov OC ytl� C,Y..LCY� b dYL4 wv�L' 'ce_`o c: t - _$a' $ '- & as V22�.4 ➢i Ys', �• a� 4 7 Yv 4��aTT 4 4 ii per. ..0.G N 49 �t wYi �.W a _COY 6��W 9,Y. "R� ej aoL a �.'`. » .�'°.v $�tt:.A. mN yY Q^4 rr O 4 .�.. � � ®I `°'( �► _I � I I �I of el g Q p @ a @ we mu 1 �B SIRE HY Y6 Y6 q atl�QA i�p 01 yO` ®_ Heal as a t s '"Ila N And�J a� �r31 8: ;fish < �r ro _� C V� `ILm p N V N C y ILm.� cc-e �L pq d 4 , _e Wo FQ� M L sp q CC.L..y f�GjjlL® r y a` �Y®■Y aGui3 as�y%= ... 5� � Lu 0. V? $nt 0 �• �` Se� .��g S VIP ell IN I $ 3,a all IL E .NB ®.Wst,tD 0 !�E '-U T OF'RAI3CHO CUodA40ItqA ST REQRT ' w. L; DA?E; March 28, 1930 T0: Chairman'and Nfembers 'of a njng Comm7ss'ion FROM: Brad Builer, City Planrer+�` BY: Tom Grahn, Assistant.''P1ann r SUBJECT! VARIANCE 90-02 - DISAR 0� "il request° tcalla�i .-the construction .af a .5-.foo ,'6 �nch;,solid block wa}1` within' the front yard setback �,af a,",lot with i.n 'the Very Low - Residential. district; (1-2 dwelling ;nits per acre), located at 5255 Jasper Street - APP1:"1061 4ZI-32. This item was continued, from the March 14a 1990 Planning ,Commission meeting to allow Commission'members the opportun ty..to further study the Variance request and to'consider whether there are viable alternatives.. Ieciuded with this package js the March 14, 1990 Staff Report and both a Resolution of Approva} and a Resolution of 0enia}. NoTG•mlg AttachmNnts: March 14, 1990 Sta ';Report Resolution of Approva} :1 Resolution of Denial ,1 i 'I i' k a r L G fi I iJ:l'1 •M1 y ` a fy Cti CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA . STAFF REPORT 46 U - DATE: March 14, 1990 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission cs FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Tom Grahn, Assistant Planner SUBJECT':' VARIANCE 90-02 - DISARIO - A request to allow the construction :of a 5-.foot, 6-inch solid,block wall within the front yard setback of'a lot;, within the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwell�fng units per, acre), located at 5255 Jasper Street - APN: 1061421-32: ' 1. ABSTRACT: The Variance re quest is to al.law for the_con`strot tion of a solid masonry wall `o be;located along a portion.of:the front property 1ine.12 feet behind the curb face. The wall wih' be used. to screen recreational: vehicles and'.horse corrals,:to proitot the yard fron. illegal dumping of trash, and to enclose the yaid to prevent people frcm disturbing the property owner's pets (see Exhibit II. BACKGROUND: Thp design and layout of the parcel (:see Exhibit is such that the front property line wraps'around 'the .cnrner of La - Senda Road and Jasper Street, 'extending south onto Jasper Street: The 'side lot lines range from 145 feet to 235 feet. however, a portion of the lot reduces to approximately 87 feet i wide because of the design of the parcel.. , Locai equestrian trail and drainaga easements run along the rear propert�`line and a local equestrian trail easement runs along the northerly side property line. The parcel contains approximately 48,240 square. feet and has 293.45' lineal feet of-street frontage.. An existing single family residence is-located,adjacent to the south property line, yet the majority of the parcel located north of the house is vacant. The applicant has constructed a 3-foot solid.masonry wall with 3- feet ofwrought iron at the front property line in front of the existing residence. III. ' ANALYSIS: The Development Code does have provisions for 'the placement of a wall at the frnnt property line, .however, the limitations are very specific. The Code limitations are intended . to prevent development of a "walled-in" con,unity. ' This; is particularly ;true in . the Alta' Loma area with its rural character. Section 17.08.060.J.3 of the Development Code states ANNING COMMISSION .ttAFF,REPORT PL ' VA 90=02 - DISARIO March '14, 1990 Page 2 ''A combination of-so-id an-A open fences°(e.g. wrought iron, chain link) not to exceed . ! 6 feet in height-may be located in`;a.required. ,! front yard,, corner. side,.yard or .visibil'. y clearance area, provided`: such.. fences a re- construeted;,.With`at: 1east:90 percent of the to feel ,rp their vertical. surface. open, andnon-viE.r;obscuring,° 5 Variance applications;must:cons i der' code.res,trictions'and_whether or not a hardship exists that would prevent the 'property owner frdm building accordi^1 ta to esblished cede requirements: Exhibit,'- shows existing casements- and,the' front and.s;id'",yard "setbsck lines which help in dotermining�,the net bu�ldab a area .however; additional building coverage requirements will `apply.: ?.Review of the buildable-'area, Indicates sdfficient`;:depth '`would,�_exisi; future structures,,,;approximately 27 feet "at`tt4-narrowesi potot- i`f. the,solid masonry ;gall were constructed=at the front. building �r setback requirement;-,which is: 42-feet behind the curb.,:faci. in terms of neighborhood` compatibility, the 'construction ..of..-a solid masonry wall at. Jfront ;,r'operty line would:,'be- inconsistent with the street' character .established_ by the t placement of 'adjacent; `residehtial :_structures. Although 'no adjacent resi.dences ,Would acivally":front onto the proposed wall, no other, properties in the, ,vicinity .have. a solid 6-'foot high masonry'wall located along the front property line, iv. REQUIRED' FINDINGS: Before, granting_ a `Variance,. the' Pian,�ing Commission shall make ail 'Of the f�ilowing; f?ndi)ys. Any finding in the negative would `preclude approval of the,- A. request. 4' A +hat strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations ,would result in,'practicai diif_iculty'or . unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with theme^h3ectfves of the Development; Code. ; (" 'd , B. That there are exceptional or extraordinary ciedumstances'.or conditions applicable to'" the -property involved or to ,the intended use of the property that: do not apply generaThy,to the other properties ia, the same district.- C. That.strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the, appiicant or privi eges enjoyed ' by the owners of other properties in�-the same . district. L � 3� PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF'-'A VA 90-02 tJISAR20 ? ; i March 14,, 1990 f Page 3 0. That the granting 'of the Variance will Oot.constitute & grak .,,, of special priVv ege%_ inconsistent with the.Iiinit�-tigns 'on � other' groper-ties.�1ass'c`fied in.the "same��district ��- E. That the granting of thear,,'Viance wi11 'ngt b%'rdarimental, to the public healthsssafety, or°we`lfare a'rj- f eh,al1y injurious to,properties gr,;inprovements, n the vicinity,,';.,; ' V. }tECONMENllAT70N;'` .Staff recommends,, thity.the Planrtgg;,Commss ion deny, Ehe }lariance through adoptiongfthe,attachetl Re,olu,' 7op Respectfully submwitted;,7777 .; ±{ t J Brad Bu17�r City Planner BB:TG•Sp Attachments,: Exhib:,+ "A° Letter frvh the.Applicant." 711 Exhibit Le�atioh: Map " rExhbt "C" Site ;Plan Exhibit "0" �pplic,4nt's;Plin Resolution;cf-OeniarOf )1 t ,L< Y e• � �Rt AC- t va p � ; ,•z C. LA U J L " RESOLUTION NO'. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF o7HE CITY'; OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CAL'1FORNCA APPkOVING -VARIANCE ,.. NO. '90-OZ, `'A REQUEST T0: ALLOW' THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 54001j S .INCH- SOLID. BLOCK WALL WITHIN THE FRONT�;YARD SETBACK LOCATED AT 5255 .'JASPER 'STREET IN ,THE VERY LOW RESIDENTift DISTRICT. (1-2; DWELtING'UNiTS 'PER:'ACRE), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - ON: 1681-221-J2. A. Recitals. , (i) Thomas . Disario:'has fil ed...t'�4 application for. the issuance of Variance No. 40-02 as.described in the i.,,"`e of thisasolutinn. Hereinafter in this Resolution, .the ,.+subject Variance request is ,referred te, as!. the application" On March .14 . and, co►tinued to :March 28, 199D, the Plan0vig Commission of the City o.f;Rancho-, Cucamonga conducte a d- ' duly noticed public hearing on,the.application and concluded-said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites -prior to the adoption of this.Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution: NOW, THERcFORE it- is hereby found, determined and resoived "by the Planning Commission of the City, of Rancho',Cucamonga as follows: 1. This-Commission hereby specifically 'finds that ail of the''�;ts. set. forth 'ifs the Recitals; Part A,.,,of�ahis Resolution are ,true and. correc 2 Th;s Commission hereby finds and certifies that the. project' has beep raviewed and considered in compliance .with` the Californ3a_: Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and finds the.prpjec,t to be Class ? Categorically Exempt. 3, Based upon substantial evideitee presented to this Commission during . the above-referenced,.public-hearings on March 14 and March 28 1990, including . written and oral :staff `:reports, -together with ;public _'testimony, this Commission hereby specifically,finds�as follows,,-' (a) The application appil es. to property located at 5255 Jasper Street with a street 'frontage 'of 293.4.5 feet'and lot depth. rsnging %from 145 feet to 234.59 feet and is presently improved with one (11 single family residence; and {b) All adjacent parcels have been: developed., with single famil;+, j residences and are 116cated,within1the fiery Lore Residential -District; and :` I PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION f VA 90-02 - DISARIO March 28, 1990 I " Page 2, (c) The application contemplates the' cons tru_tion of a 5-foot, i. 6-inch solid masonry tial1. along approximately, 200 feet of the front property line, contrary to the requirements that said wall be_canstructed at or behind the front setback line of 42 feet measured from .the curb fare, .as stated in Section 17.08.060.4.3 of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Ccde: 4 . Based upon the substantial evidence ,presented l'to ;this Commission during the ;above-referenced; public 'hearing and upon 'the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 2,;;and'3 above, this ,'Commission hf`e6y':finds and concludes as follows: -(a) - That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would result: in -practical difficulty`•or, unnecessary -physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Developme,nt'Code.` (b) That there ;are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved ror,to the intended use of the property that,do not�apply ;general y.to other`prooerties in the same district. (c) That StriCtr or literal interpretation' and enforcement of. the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enfoyad"by the owners of other properties :in the "sane distr.icti:. +, (d) That the granting. of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other, properties classified in the same district. (e) That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the Public "health, safety, or-welfare �or materially injurious to, properties or, improvements in the vicinity. 5) Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth-in;paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the apt?vkation. 6.' The Secretary, to this Commission shall certify to the adopt-ion`-of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS18TH DAY OF MARCH, 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE „CITY OF'.RANCHO�UCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman, ATTEST- Brad Buller, Secretary71 e. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION VA 90-02 - 'OISARIO March 28, 1990 Page 3 y~ I, Brad Buller, Ser,-retary 'of the Planning Commission-.of the City .of kan ho Cucamonga,, do hereby .certify that the foregoing Resolutjon was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and;adopted by the Planning Commission of ,the City of Rancho Cucam6nga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commiss0n held on the 28th day of March, 1090, by the. fbilo4ing'vote-.to v»t; AYES: COMMISSIONERS: n NOES: ; COMMISSIOW`RS: ABSENTx CO, SSIONEk r:• , ti �'t P i! RESOLUTION NO. A kESOLUTION 'OF THE PLANNINQ, COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RAN0,,40 CUCAMONG4, CALIFORNIA, DENYING VARIANCE NO, 9042, , A REQUEST TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 5400T, 6-INCH SOLID BLOCKIIALL WITHIN THE FRONT' YARD SETBACK LOCATED AT 5255, JASPER'STREET. 'A THE, VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL .DISTRICT (1-2 'DWELL'ING UNITS PER ACRE)-, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APH: 1061-22I-32. A. Recitals. (i) Thomas .Disario ' has 'filed an appi ration for 1he issuance of Variance No. 90-02 as described in. the title of this Resolut#gn. Hereinafter 'in this Resolution,; the sub ect Variance request is refei?red to as "the application". (1 On March 14 and continued to March 28, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly Noticed public. hearing on the application and concluded:said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. 8 Resolution. - NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined' ar'nii resolved by the Planning Commission of the City-af' Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. t'his. Commission hereby specifically finds that all the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this`Resolution are true`ra >`�rrect. 2. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and fines the- project to be Class 1 Categorically Exempt:. 3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commissian during the above-referenced public hearings on'March 14 and Marsh 28, 1990, including written and. oral 'staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby :pacifically finds -as follows: (a) The application applies to proFeety located' at 5255 Jasper _Street with a street frontage of`293.45+ feet and lot depth ranging from 145 feet to 234 59 feet and is pre'sentiy improved with owe (1) sin le family ; residcncel'and (b) '.All adjacent parcels, have, been developed with single, family residences and are located'within the,Verylow Residential District; and .x w PLANNING OMMISSION RESOLUTION VA 90-02 - DISARIO _ March 14, 1990 Page 2 (c) The application contemplates the construction of a 5-fogq,t�� , 6-inch' solid masonry wall along approximately 200 feet>`of the front ;property line, contrary to the requirements that said wall be constructed at or behind the front setback line .i_-`,42 feet measured from the curb face, as stated in Section 17.08,06O J.3 0'the Rancho Cucamonga Development,Code 1` (d) The variances as specified in the application would contradict the objectives of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. More specifically, the application as proposed-would be materially detrimental to the persons and property in the immediate v.icfnii '.foe the following reasons: i) The neighborhood surrounding the suhject site consists _largely of residential uses with large setbacks and open yard areas. No other property in the neighborhood ,has similar walls located within the front setback area. ii) The applica.tion`as submitted would be. incompatible with the neighborhood's rural character. The subject pre,,erty and surrounding ". neighborhood are designated;as an Equestrian/Rural Overlay District. (e) There is sufficient depth on the parcel to allow for use and enjoyment of the parcel with the 5-foot, 6-inch solid masonry-wall constructed at the fron±.;setback_line. 4. Based upon the substantial evidenc.-*;presented to this Commission during the above-referenced;public hearing and pon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would not result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. (b) That there are not exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the in use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. (c) That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation wouid 'not deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. (d) That the granting of the Variance will constitute a `grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on ;:other properties classified in the same district. (e) That the granting of the Variance will be. d.etrimental• to the public health,, safety;-,or'welfare or materially injurious .to properties or improverdents in the vicinity. 'r" PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION _ VA 9tS-02 DISARIO March 14. 1990 Page 3 S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1& 2, 3, rnd 4 above, this Commission hereby denies the application. 6. The Secretary to this Cotimission shall, certify to the adoption of l,his Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF MARCH', 1990.' PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMrjNrA y ti i BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller,';Secretary I, Brad Buller., Secretary of the Planning Comn.ission'of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do. hereby certify that the ` foregoina„ Re0alution was duly and regularly introduced; passed, and..adopted by the Planning ..Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a mm regular meeting of the Planning C! ission held Aft on the 28th day of March, 1990, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT`: COMMISSIONERS: i f= �" a C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAVT REPORT, DATE: March-28, I990 TO: Chaim,an and Members-of the P1annorg Commission FRG.: Brad 9uIIer, City °banner. BY: Brucit Buckingham, P1L ,ling'Technician SUBJECT: VARjMCF 90-01 - VERA A request, to allow the construction of a house to encroach into the, required interior. side yard setback.by 5 Feet fora single family residence located- in the.,`Cow Res'identiial- District (2-4 dwelling limits per acre^!-;At 9817''Feron Bou ievard - APN: 209-063-03. 1. ABSTRACT: This item`was continued from the March'14., 119190 regular meeting since the applicant wa� ,not'present at ,he meeting. II. PROJECT AND SITF, DL'•SCRIPTIQN: A. Action Re. -isted Approval of a' Variance to .reduce the interior sikt,. ,yard setback. Surrounding Land u:le and Zonin North - Existing Single Family Homes; Low Residential District -(2-4 dwelling units per acre) South Existing Single Family Homes; Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East a (Existing Single Family Homes; Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Existing Single Family Homes; Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units ,er acre) C. Geaeral Plan Designations: Protect Site - Low Residential District (2-4 dweltina units per acre) North - Low Residential District South - Lour Residential District East - Low Residential District West - -Low Residential District D. Site Characteristics: The site is. vacant and' vegetation consists of native weeds and plants. Il'EM D. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT '1! VARIANU 00-61 VERA 7 ` March 14, 1990, Page 2 ,1 III. ANALYSIS: ,r A. General: The applicant is requesting 4'Variance to, reduce the -� interior side yard setback on the westerly side of "the lot from 10 feet to 5'feet in order,*a.?.construct a 1,450 'square foot;single family dwAilin-9 ' the ssrr�ject lot is, located east of Archibald on the south :side of r2ronr6oulevard. The lot is '~ 35 feet by:160 feet (5;690. square feel`.), with street__frontagL on the north and public alley on the south. The"subject lot is legal non-cor.,forming in "terms,,of area and"width, :which is typical thraughout;the "°neighborhood. -The Development Code allows for• the construction of. a- single family" home on a substandard legal lot .as' long ,as it meets ;all development,,. standards. B. Site Canstra'. _sr In reviewing the Variance request, staff -axamined the site constraints of the lot. The subject lot 'is 35 feet wide which i5 substantially less than the required 65 feet as per the current standards of the Development Code for the Low Pesidential 'Distrgict. . In addition, the ]'ot size ,,is 5,600 square feet which :s considerably less than the minimum" of 7,260 square feet required under the ,cu.;rent-standards of ; the Development Code for _tne Low Residential District ' C. Characteristics of the Surrounding Neighborhood: The. li surrounding neighborhood >hds a wide variety of lot sizes"-and widths, however, the vast majority, are also legally "non- conforming in area and width. The single family home.s,ron the north side of Feron Boulevard possess", the,t�,iypical characteristics of a Low Residential District.' A field survey indicates that they meet the `interior " side .yards` setback standards "of 10 feet and 5 feet'. As-for the houses on the south—side of Feron Boulevard, the-"field '>survey- shbws a varie+ion of standard and substandard lot sizes and lot width'; However, -the majority of the lots meet the interior side ydrd setbacks of 10 feet' and 5 feet.~ The establishiW' `I character on the sou .th side of 'Feron s that_of small, q e- story bungalows .with detached ,garages in the rear. "There are several lots with 35-foot: widths and 160-foot lengths,"which . typically have detached garages on the rear portion- of the lot. In conclusion, st+rff finds that the size and sh?pe of subject lot is 5 tine substandard which could create L_:physical hTrdship for the applicant to build a tingle ,~amity home There are several similar, lots towards the south,side'of "Feron Boulevard that have nonconforming interior side" setback's j U PLANNIiiG COMMISSION STAFF REPORT` VARIANCE '90-01 - VERA March 14, 1950 Page 3 However,, the proposed structure is not consistent with the character of the surrounding neighborhood. IV. OPTIONS:' Staff, believes that 'there are alternative floor plan arrangements which could comply with the _City's setbacks-. One example;from Terra Vista is shown in Exhibit "E A. A zero lot`, line'style footpwint, 20 fae wide, with a side- entry front door,`would ;meet the required 5-w and-10-foot side yard setbacks (see Exhibit "P).. The disadvantage of this . option is t(lat the streetscape would be dominated by �the, garage'door. B. A variation of the zero lot line house would be, to utilize a side, entry garage (see Exhibit "G"), The disadvantage of this option is that the,.narrow lot-would necessitate developing a shared driveway through the property to the east , C. A detached garage;in the rear would allow, the living' areas'_of the house to face the street consistent with'the ndighborhood character (see Exhibit "H"). This option would stil'l. require . reducing the footprint width to' 20 feet to cor,:ply with the S- and 10-foot side yard setbacks. If the :ommission feels that 5-foot side yard setbacks are justified, the Commission may want to ;till require a detached garage in the rear to mitigate the=`streetscape appearance of the • structure. V. FACTS FOR' FINDINGS: In order to `approve the proposed Variance, the Planning Commission must make all., of the following' findi�;gs,, Any finding in. the 'negative would preclude; approval of the variance request. A. Than strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in.practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives or this Code. J. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances`or conditions applicable to the property involved _:'to -the,. intended use of the property `that do not apply geierall;y'i to other properties in the dame zone. C. That strict or literal;' interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of pri.vi]ege`s enjoyed by the owners oif other properties in ;the same zone. jjj7 PLANNING z COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VARIANCE 90-01 VERA; March 14, 1990 3r Page 4 D. That the granting,of the Vd riance will not constitute a grant of special `privileges in-nsistent, with the ,limitations n. other properties classifik'fn the same 'zone' E. That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or in the vicinity. VI. RECOMMEI]DATION: , Staff recommends that the Planning Cammissiov� take one of the following actions: ` t 1<) Deny the variance request and; dirsct staff to prepare a Resolution with findings for adoption at your next meeting. 2) Continue the request to' allow the,applicant 'to_ develop a f I oorplarr which,meets all required setbacks, consistent with., one of the options described above. Staff does not 4upport`the granting of the variance,as, currently proposed. Res ly s ed ra Bu City PI nner BB•BB:js Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Flap ` Exhibit "B" - Topography Map showing existing structures Exhibit "C",- Site Plan 'and Floor Plan Exhibit "D"'- Elevations Exhibit "E1l - Alternative Floor plan and Elevations Exhibit "F" - 9pti.on'A Exhibit' nG" Option B Exhibit "H" Option C rr y� 4i i - F I ® 81 MA 101�' Cot C' rN!•JJ.iO rJr rarer a . •JJCffI00Y s,(t p�-OT-•i �.. Jl'/M - • YJ „� r \. T V _r �.a •• � 11 If � � 19tE1' a � Lm r• ,e 71Tgv. tol•O• J wr T z e Lrr'M• L•I•C•`r B_ _ ..�� Q IJp u - �I•�EII 4• 41 COD 'sroinr 80•UL+V4Po--{ a o V +aC 799 tat d' 3 r se. ®— ` G. GY G1s ; rrs .Ord , Lrl•N' it ea eT.a L` T. 1 871 M;4p e6 --47.0 a 1, � •M1 79 la ]6 17• 2 pp 1 wrU go.! 2 ! Du s . a 1- l S °z s1$J48So-_ <12 I IIl_ n�an 1© �i i i GC.. O 6LVA^: IIs i.}ti i',to11 a ;,Is ro 3 1II 11 a 0 a 7 Y 9;O! i'++` i$OSl tl tl w 11 1t O to 13 12 11 ro-P • ) 6 7 1 l,.2•'1 z i IIJM E�Y7 Ly]�D.117II 7730 6 7H,tOia'Ut t3�fi s3 as Taa�: ? 'J 9�P7'tB�$9�71,3$'177a 1Ht0 t1'BE a7<a 43 N87• i13'7a 77 I ' GI 8l �I IC72 v .s ®1;9 O G• � .. ' R MAW i 1 wai.T�II ;1 c 9 3 lS D G' ( (D ® mr $e132928 Eo it 10 Gila 1314it of11'10~t a 711 a�'-0 7 t'1 ¢ Nd7 adllt Mlt F917.Iar1a 10 NIlIN 10t 17' ® Gi I,r.•Lw•n•9 wawa `� . .. .ear Lsr•1L•r r•e w a .d - _ LYR£Qi-t• ry E 9i�'tl r��. jl"ii3— �CII&OF RA-14 ICUCAMONGA TY' M: } PLANNING'I3IVISION �E: LOt,RTiA MR? :' N Is a A !1� A 1 --- -- — -- KJ x ,ms : FERCd'•Bl.�` x m �, --- ------- — -- — —, — — — — (f�—J — —T,I-- 1 i e e peA. I 1 Ix �e•�y,. ,� ,; I' 1 • •• I o°O• • as A JIV 1 1 i . i � A 1 1 icm MM STREW ml x =liw X X ,i,l, IMA r � A A V+ r 6'IY OF RA14 -CCjCA.MONGA I M.K. UA��'�► KAWNG`DIV iSIGIN °T MF.S (xvdz'S►=� o� "��P � + r EMISM. SCALE: a PRE u a ae s tg <0 It i! pp jf1 a . I _ z- - p a ONS, — s — Afm�"4;,.� -,all I CT F It t tr �UCAtvIJ;°�GA �; "z PLANNING DI IOIoJ S PtE I'L04 � EXHIBtY': G SC.AALE: D `7 Ifl v yrl i.L�.Lt,[�147L t'lt 1 I !.� fit:` tti I Irl,ft IIt.�Itrt t_.Il�t�l j. T TY OF-,RA CRO-CUCA1VIONGA Mat VAR . 3-0 -PLANNI 'I % S ON LEV A�for1 S _ AtIE i'7L 36'-W 10t mill I `�- 60i 16'x 12' ANIL I �G• 'S Imo. ,yALL E 9a o 20'.20' etk Iw GATE o , Ig111 .Vpr i t •� N''W -M M1% fatte ,•�1,. a "',-.may.► �' - . e u6b * R .� •r i As S' ,,w a pv i •c �•,t h'.,pi.�•.! �g,� c��.Rr '.b,r c ,�,� "K••y As:.�iF� tD - t � A. I�RONT ELE4'PTI�t� p REAR ELEVATION Q �. •�tv �� j � .t1�'' .ILL. ,��E►}g �' a "'� �--�� �+�... .�.sa+:._; '•�� '"P'yy.,�, $� 'ram�,per 1-�2 ®A; RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION a 'l fp i i ',CITY ®1''1sWf, o�iCLAM NGA. EXg t'EM SCALE: ,1 1 J I 'I i 'LAI�i1�II 'BIVI�IQT� " 'Yn-CE;, E}i iIEIT: 5CALE. °%/Q I r to' e E _ F CITY OT-.RAiVdTO-,CLjCAMONCA IEtii: PLANNING`DIVISION Tram OPT/o tj EXH113M N SCALE: 'C%(U� D 1 �.f S CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 28, 1990 TO: Chairman, and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: grad Buller, City Planner BY: Alan Warren, Associate Planner SUBJECT: STREET NAME MANGE NO 90-01 - CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA - A proposal to ch"ange nave of Rochester Avenue old portion) from 4th Street to a;point approximately 600 feet north of 6th Street,' a distance of, approximately 3110 of a mile. Suggested name to Smith Avenue. -Proposal to also change name of that portion of Rochester Avenue (new portion) south of 6th: Street.- Suggested name change to Rochester Court. Alternative street names may be- considered by the Planning Comm+ Sion. 1. BACKGROUND: On February 16, 1990, the Planning Commission declared its intent to in 'late the process to rename portions of Rochester Avenue '(Resolution No. 90-23; immediately north and south of 6th Street as requested bi, Mr. Irving V. Augur of Leisure Crafts. This action was taken beriusei the 'Planning Cc:mnissioa' recognized the potential confusion' of having two Rochester Avenue intersections within 450 feet of each other on, 6th Street. TI. DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS. The issues analyzed i,n the renaming process, included selection of name"" appropriate for use in the general' area, and development 1f a street; naming plan for consideration by the Planning Commission. Street Names: Staff thought this would be a .good opportunity to consider the use of historically' ;sign.ficant names for the new street na-(s). The Historic Prese?nation Cwimission (HPC) provided some, suggestions for names significant to the area in question. From the information gathered, staff believes "Smith" G would be the most appropriate. The Smith Brothers, from Rochester. Pennsylvania helped develop the Community of Rochester in 1886 and i they operated ;various businesses near Rochester and 8th Streets j (refer to Exhibit "A,,). Other names suggested by the Historic ;Preservation 'Commission Amiee "Lopez".,c�ude " " "Di ;Carlo" "La e1VAsi", ,and "Van Fleet" from _ i 6 I families which`were involved in the aroma s development'1n the late Itr O'slearly 190014_ ITEM E' ti - t µl PLANNING C614MISSION STAFF REPORT i STREET NAIKE CHANGE NO. 90-01 - ROCHESTER AVE HLE yl MARCH 28, 1990 Page 2' r'. Street Pame Plan::, The volution proposed i that the i:am? change iric1ude all of i; -t Rachester'Avenue—roadway from its intersection with 4th Street to its "T'$ intersection with the new Rochester roadway (just nurt;, of-6th Street). Also, the deati,end stub streetjust south of 6th Street would be named •Rochestir Cottrt`(refer to Exhibit "B"). The following issues and impacts were considered •gin the :election of:this solution; 1. T,iere would no. be any offset street name intersections. 2. This Plan was favored by the Fire and Sheriff Departments. 3 The need to have Rochester Avenue ac a continuous namerfrom the north to th€. sough parts of the community may bt-a mute point since the City`s circulation plans for the area provide., for the eventual at�am'onment of the Rochester Avenue/4th Street intorsection. 1 4. This Plan would c>use 65 property owners/business locations/residents-'to change their address. l 5. This Plan is;in canformancc'with'all provisions of tls City`s street naming rrovisions, City Cody Chapter 12,12. 6. Smith Avenue will .end at the Ontario tasty- Limits. 7. Recorded subdivision snaps ,could need to be amended. S, titili$y companies, emergency services snd the Post Office would have Ito revise their systems to accommodate the name changes, 9. Street signs will need to be repiacad. This. Plan was also reviewed by thy. Postmastzr and the Cityof Ontario. No concerns were indicated by Ontario. As of the writ ha of this .'aport, no response has been 'received from the postmaster: III. 9NVIRQH14ENTAL ANALYSIS: Apart from the minor inpact�tr listed in Part i, staff does not see any possibility that'"the sirreet naming Ptah would have a significant effect on the 'environTent and therefore, this activity is not. 'subject to the California Environmental Quality Act, per Sectioli U061(b)(3 .. rf- the name . change is approved, a Notice of .Exemption shall be filed far the,. project as required by .tEQA, Sgciion 15061(d)., IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Based on the information contained. it this report and 'stal-f analysis of th,�:;.proposal;' it -is .recommended-tha the following findings can be made in regard to this action: ,I! Oz PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT: r -STREET.NAME CHANGE KO gu-01; kOWF14TER ,AVENUE ; ,MARCH'28, 1990.. Page 3 A. That;the pr,'lposed ,change is:cgnsistent with the gads,,, policies and standaM of the General:Ptah; { f: B. That the" proposed;change; is'consistent ,with`; the airc'ula.io.j element of the,Generi! Plan; C. That �he. proQosed change_ u�11, rat cause sign t ifica " a6erse impacts upon the environment; T '0. That the Proposed change° is deemed necessary to protect �Y�e ' pu lic health, safe-ty, ,comfort, .cav'iveftieke, . ant,' genera 'welfare 5y`,corrccting the d`auole Rochester Avenue intersection i. at 6th Street'. � V. CORRESPONDENCE: This )tem.has been advertised "In;The`Da�l�r Report newspaper.; designa.ud=areas were posted along Rocheater,Avenue,And,; written notices were_ sent,� -to proper y , � owners �=an.� '- residents/businesses who `-faced ••onto or, -abutted the arfeoted Portions of Rodhester' vepue. VI. RECOMMENDATION z It. is recoii�nenA2d that .the ?zkTning Commission conduct a pub'=c hearing and consider 'all as' of the stress `! natzing Tap.— if.the, Conn�s5ion concurs with �; �stificatrons {tor the staff �trcemrt!en�'ed :Plans it would be apt r .° to a`pprove'thS at ached "itesolution. Respec;�fully submr,tted, Brad 06*1er City Planner BB:AW•mig Attachments: Exhibit �A" Etiwanda., The First 'Years, Paqe 12 Exhibit "B" -'krea'Map of Recommended Plan Re!�otation of hpproikal I `111 it r�n 4Z The Smith brothers.from Rochester: Pennsvivania.came to the Cucamonga -� area and began purchasing land in 1886.The property was in the area of a �` what is now Rochester and Eig:ith SEreet. A hotel, land office. general D-awing of Rochester Hotel and Land Office store. and post office was established all in one building.They hoped to build a dream city and many a,res were sold to settlers from the East-A school was constructed to 1891. Although succe sful fora couple of years. the town of Rochester became involved in litigation with the Eriwanda Water Co.over watersources and in 1894 lost their; la court.The colony died after a sever drought in 1898.1899, Peoplc began to leave the y _ 4_� We! •=�> area. and br 191 7 the post office was closed. The Rochester "Water Co. �4 r moved its headquarters to Los An_p_eles that year r— I Picture of Rochester Hotel iust'before it was dcmohshed. f The Fe Railaaq and Packing House,about 18R9 ° STM Me-fuar� Eteffi Titter EWAJAWA,'mr JST. (oc,YRS, 9VY Ezhibit: A scale: AWA OF AL NOW 114M ;T11 rAry / Iox � z ��AN �-111R�P1C� W ASM -NOW-sup-.-filg MOW Q ra le �YT6i+ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAR ONGA 'r nENI: �A;Ave.�" #Aw PLMNIN'G DIVISI Jt 1 '?` fZEc MW"ED F�Cp j �-A MAP �.� _..� _ 5 SCAiE a RESOLUTION NO., A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO,,,CUCAMONGA RECOMMENDING _'APPROVAL OF STREET NAME CHANGE NO. 90-01 TO CHANGE THE NAME �F TWO PORTIONS OF ROCHESTER '"AVENUE TO SMITH AVENUE AlIO ROCHE3TER,'COURT RESPECTIVELY, AND'MAKINO�FINOINGS IN_?iUPPORT'THEREOF . i' A. Recitals: On February 14; 1990, the Plann;ng,Commission of the City of = ' . Rancho Cucamonga reviewed a°written request by Mi,'. Irving V. Augut�'to;rename''A portion of Rochester Avenue -in If the' area_- jf its. intersections with 6th Street. On that date, the Panning Commission; by its. adoption of Resolution No. 90-23 its intention to in declared itiate the prowess to,rename portions'af Rochester Avenue i*ediately north and south of 6 t h Street. (ii) On March 28, 1.990, the Planning Commissio1 of the City of ,- Rancho Cucamonga conducted a ;:duly noticed "p6bl1,6 hearing for ' he above-mentioned street renasne proposal,. Streit Name Change No.'90-01','pursuant to the City Code Chapter 1212. (iii) The, Rancho Cucamonge Planning'4Qivis ,on wrepared. a '=report which addressed the justifica,.ion for the change', recommended=a stty t 'nam ng plan, provided alternate replacement naves, and:discus ed the: impacts of"-- he recommended change. m ff (iv} A11 legal ,prerzquisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B; Reso',ition. %i NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, 'deterfiined and resolved by thf Planning Commission of the City of Ranchatucamonga as fol?ows 1. This Commiss,iort hereby specifically finds, that 1'11. o'jl ttje facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A", of this nesu1ution are Itrue, atld correct. - u 2. Based upon substantfial evidence presented to th(s ,Cg tis during the shove-referenced public I hearinq� on March 28,, 1990. incl,udi `y' written and .tlra1 staff reports, together with publtc .festimonv, -thi1^^; Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:. a. The current Rochester Avenue street naming 'situatiCn which results. in two (2) Rochester Avenue "Intersections At 6i4 Street i potentially confusing to the general public anti emer8ency. personnEt .and i should be,-corrected., 4: 1 �� „ PLANNINV',COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. STREET;'AME. CHANGE - 'No. 90-01 MARCH 2B, 1990 Page 2 b. T'ne.,prop0sed'name "Smith" has historical: significamce�to. the general area,, where ='the Smith Brothers, helped develop comme'Irz tal activities near Rochester and 8th-Streets in the late 18b0's.; c. The street name change, "Smith ,Avenel," -applies: 'to . a?proximately°8!10 of a mils of Rochester. Avenue between the'southern Rancho Cucamonga City limits and its intersectioniterminus with the' aew portion by Rochester Avenue. d. The street name change; "Rochester. Court," applies to that portion �51` Rochester Avenue that is approximately 820' feet west of the I-15 Freeway from its terminus 600, feet south of 6th Street to its Intersection with 6th Street. e. ' This proposed street name ;ch;nge would not be materially injurious os, detrimental to the properties adjacent to Rochester Avenue and would not have a significant impact on. the environment nor surrounding properties. f. That this street name .change proposal is.ir� conformance with the pr•uvisions of the Ciiy's Street Naming provisions, City Cede lY' Chapter 12.1Z.' 3. Based upon, the substantial.",evidence presented "to this Commission during the public hearing and, upon the specific findings<of fait, set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hertft finds and cenc'ludes as`foliows a. That the proposed name 'change is consistent with the goals, ;zilicies and standards of the General Plan. b. That ' the proposed change is consistent with the Circulation Element of the -General=Plan. ' C. That the proposed change will not cause significant adverse impact upon the environment. d. The proposed'change is deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety ccmfort, convenience and general welfare by providing. only one (1) Rochester Avenue intersection at 6th Street, 4. This Commission "hereby finds that the- project 'has beenl reviewed and consldered for compliance with the California Environmental quality' Act and, of 1970 and determines this _:Vtion to be, Exempt from further environmental review, as provided in,CEQA Section 15061(b)(3). S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, thisCortin;ssion hereb; resolves that pursuagt'to ' Section b5a"av to 55855 of tie ,Caiifr„-d4a Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on. the; 28th day of March, 1990 of-Street 'Name Change No. 90.01. r. 4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOtU.TION NO r_ STREET NAME CHANGE,- N0. g0-01 MARCH 28, 2990 Page 3 �r � t . i5.. The Deputy Se;rI a.-Y to this Commission shall certify tg�"Lhe adoption of this Rasalut,�an.- APPROVED ApND ADOPTED THIS 20TH.DAY OF MART PLANNING COMMTSSIUN'OF THE,'GITY OF RANCHD.,CUCAMO_NGA , . . LaFr.Y T. TMcNiel,:-Chairman- a ATTEST: r} Bradtbuiler ccetary, I, Brad Bul"rer, Secretary. of'the yPlanning<:'Cbmeissi6n_,,of the- City, of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby cert rye,that.'i;he 'orego;ing {t Solutiom was "duly and regularly introduced, passed, and .adoated by the,PIE?Gning'Co�mnission of.the City of Rancho Cucamang�, at` a ':gular meeting.of the.,Planning Commission heSd on the 28th day af'rlarcn, j990, .by the foj;loaring;vote-to-W3G AYES: COMMISSIOsVERS: NOES: c9FiM I MMERS: f, ABSENT: COMMISSIOVER3:' I. 1`+ + r C f�. 1, T '. 'A ;}. t° r' C=OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA . STAFF;REPORT 3�1 DATE: March 19: I990' ,i Cha•irman and Members of'the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Bull,r City Planner BY: Randy Day,-Planning Aide I. SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL °USEt PERMIT 90-D43 JUNG -_A request ;to: establish a liquor store-An a 1,152 square`,foot leased. space"'within the,T.homas Winery Plaza, in the :SpeciaZi.ty Coarciai District, Subarea='2 of. he Foothil-1 Bouleva^d Specific,. Plan, located, at. the NEC"of +' Foothill Bou]evard and Vineyard Avenue-APN: 208-101-21.' I. PROJECT AND SI1E DESCRIPTION: A. Acticn Requested:' Approval" of.a non construction Conditional Use Permit. for a liquor store and cissualice of a 'Ne4ati,ve Declaration., li'. Surroundinaland Use,and.Zonind:,'r North - Vacant; :Office Professional South = Vacant, Liquor Store; Community ,Commerc.ia1 01str,fct == East Shopping;Center',;,Community Commercial, Dis'trict West - Rolier Rink, RestaurAnt, Unoccupied Building; Community Commercial District C. General Plan Designations: a Project Site - Specialty Commercial North - Office (Professional South Conaunity Commercial East - Community Comnar6ial I West . - Community Cora;:erciaL. D, S�t_Chera�teristcs: _ The`proect' site rs daveloped r� th ae� exist �g in4 ti-tenant, specialty ronciiercia' center (Thomas" Winery'Plaza) ITEM F A. 4•. t l�. PLANNING COMMSSION .STAFF REPQRT CUP 90-04 -;JUt+G March 28,.1990 Page 2 E. Parking Calculations: Number•', of Number of Type Square Parking' Spaces Spaces of Use * Footage Ratio Required Provided Restaurant 7,6k.4 1c100 90 90 (Existing); 1: 55 Restaurant 8 500 >t'-100 89 97 (Vacant) (under 6-000 square feet each).'. Retail 17,008 1:250"; 810 310 (Existing),; Retail 729 1:250 3 3 (Vacant) Off ce (Vacant) 6 061 1:250 �2 25 512 525 T o°re Footage 'for the Center' includes Phase'`II, Whic;i is :alieost finaled', 'and Phase III, which is''yin Plan Check. F. Applicabie Re ulations': The FoothiTi'8oulevard' SpecIft,c Plan (Subarea 2 °allows for.liquor,stores subject to the approval; of a Conditional -Use Permit by the Planning Coimnission. II. 1AALYSIS: vu A. General- .The applicant is proposing a liquor .store with off- � site sale.of general alcoholic beverages. "The 'hours of operation are from 8 a.m.. to 10 .p.m., Monday, through Sunday. Ther. will be ' a minimum of two °:(2) employees at this , location. The business is Owner operated. r B. Issues: The primary_ issues related to locating this type of,! use within a s0eci0ty-co4ntereial setting-.are compatitility, with surra-inding uses and parking availability. The follo4ipg sections address and discuss thsse issues:. r. C S f \ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Nl CUP 9,0-04 - JUNG March'28, 1990.. Page 3` 1 1) Compati.bility of Uses: There are a variety "of businesses within " the n ce ter. R etaia:/Commercial services such as Shoe Repair, Soup Pl;station " restaurant, Ceasers Pizza, Quick ,Cosine andl ',Retail Cloth;ag activities are types of Pai;esIalready ,-kisting within this multi-tenant center. .";,.`Further the closest residential area is located :approximately 1-,000 yards towards the northeast side of;the site and i separated from the center,by a collector street .(San/Bzrnardino Road). Therefore, staff believes that the liquor store will qp`-5e incompatible with the surroilnding uses.'' 2) Ava;ilability of Parking: The parking proviri;W for the V�ecialty commercial center will be 'adequa e� for ,the proposed use (see pzrking calculations). 3) Both the Sheriff Depart,ent and "the Fire Di 'Ili ct Saves reviewed the,proposal".;_," The Sheriff;Departm` has no comment .on ',`he proposal, while the—Fire District indicates that tenant improvement; plans will. be required prior to occupancy, (see Condition,51, . C.. Environmental Assessment: Upon review of Part I of" the Initial Study'-and completion of Part I1' of the Environmental Checklist,' staff has found no significW 1T,p:ts related to a liquor store locating within this specialty �6mmercial .center. III. 'FACTS IOR FINDINGS: 1) That the proposed use is in accordance with' the General Man, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the Foothill Specific Plan,,'Subarea 2, in which, ;the site is located. -2) That the 'proposed use will not be detrimental to the publfic health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to th(, .. properties or improvements in the vicinity. 31 That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable_,,`. provisions of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, Subarea,"2. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This ,tem has been adve-.tised as.a Public Hearing " in the Daily R000rt"1,ewspaper, the property posted and -not ice s sent to. all property ,owners, within the` 300 foot radius pf the') project site. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT {CUP"90.04 - JUNG - t••c March 28, 1990`' d Page 4 •z"s V. RECOMMEN IONSz'� Staiff recommendt'that the" Planning'.Commissicn rove nditidnal •Use Permit 90-04 thro!tgh the"adoption bfi the att ch esolution and;issuance of a,Negatiye Qec'.a ion. " f R sr ectf subm' d,. r� 3rad Sul er City Pinner EE:R :js' �\ r Attachments: ' Letter from,Applicant., Exhibit "A" - Location Map � '•? Exhibit "S - Site"'101an Exhibit "C" F1ooC Plaei'" 0 Resolution of Approval a i,.' Conditional'Use IF ®it Application. Non-Constructics City of Rancho Cucamonga, 1Ca. Febru-ry 234 19?a. A Letter of Explanation. I plar to open a new convenience store, with at":oholic baverage nff sale general alcoholic beverage license, in one of, a'smalI oto-rs space in the newly devalopad 'Thomas Winery Plaza'Shopping Center at corner of Foothill "Blvd.. and Vineyard Ave. The type of alcrbolic bavrrage license which. I am going to applyr,is ®ff'Edalae General Liquor it dons not allow anyceansumption of it 'an promises of ths store so Ticensed Building "I' has bean completed and some of stores in the building have bsan opened for business already. The store sprce" I-7 is new and never hac4. any business before and I am going to be the first tenant of this store. It is current ,,y vacant. Thera are ample ups„es'° of parking around' the store. (sine attached site plan of the Thomas Winery Plaza). No employee is nowded but this store will be operated by the applicant and spouse. 16 The hours of operati.;n are 0 Am to 0 midnight daily, however this is subject to approval of State, Dept. o-F Alcoholic Beverage Control. The reason for requesting this CUP is that intended sale of alcoholic beverages requires State Iieense. Application, of license to sell 'alcoholic beverage 'requires city approval in accordance wit@h city zoning ordinances V6 Ki l _J g Applicant. M-30 GeRmbVieul SF• U(714) 949-8+464 Uplmt.ID. 2o, q 11% q4q-i©6 (Ca% oI JUNSei) CITY OF RANCHO-'COCAMONGA rhm VP- 20 . PLAN"NI TG"DN- MION 'TfTz.a m EXHIBM SCALE-- 4 F-6 oR - - ET DR. { SIN LERNARQ'lP 3 RD. APN-, 20E e3l,- °07-1'Cti�- �iL SIJ .IECT STORE. 'j �p4S. VINEYARD AVE.. IITE L-Y _ =- .- -- -- HNIJUNGI?3 j 2/ 1 9/9 { API l 20e-1 u I- f �FA{ :IN < LOT . C ti t,� +T�I!_L 8L VE). !` Js IT ! r ice: C[.,� CI 'LY OF II CAMORSOA PLAIVI°TlMi� DI•Vi§16'rT � TlfLE,: foG6 ,av ltf;? e SCALE. ; !tllBrllf� � i�i � '!— • � f a [ i l fit a f in as mamas--- .::— '- --•—'" i• I t w�7.i. . .... •Ti'"� P.J4• Ft a•++f� i M�. O N { it gt ' " _ TT 7 Ic- _ a _ af' � �il�t=I•Fli`l��l•1= �_ _'�j `�! l - �y u' p�� aya+hero oo.w•wo . ` p.t � 'ci :� `� i �: .litxlf, tl�,i �� ; ham` •i4,4 •It`1111,4F•I•rL , t ! v TT �1 - w a I 6EER AND %MINE' a � f TOI-LET 7 _ -- ROOM GOUNTMR _.,� EXrT �. .FLOOD PLAN t IF .0 ;; r loklL i K i OFR&P PL PIING OI.VISION �/Q/�f'T R /-1 EXE�fR;11'• SCALE: e RESOLUTION; NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE rITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA PLANNING;;COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT'NO, qO-04 FOR` A LIQUOR STORE IN A 1,152 SQUARE_ FOOT LrTiASED SPACE 'WITHIN THE THOMAS WINERY PLAZA, IN THE SPECIALITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, SUBAREA'2 OF THE FOOTHILL PLAN,, LOCATED,' AT 'THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ruv`;r ILL EJULEVARD A)J VIfEYARD AVENUE— APN: '208-101-21. A. Recitals. i Mr. Yon -Ki1 II ( ) g has filed an-application for the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit No. 90-04 as; described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this` Resolution, the, subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the a licat•ion." PP_ � (ii) On the 28th of March, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application Hnd concluded said hearing—,n that date. (iii) All 'legal prerequisites'to, the adoption"of this Resolution have occurred. B, Resolution. NOW, 'THEREFORE, it ;,s hereby found, determined and .resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that alT of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true .and correct. Z. Based'upon sub„`antal evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on March 28, 1990, including Written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to 'property located at a leased space within the Thomas Winery Plaza, in the Special Commercial.District of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, Subarea'2, 'located at the 'northeast corner of Foothill and, Vineyard Avenue and is presently improved with',7 commercial buildings and parking spaces; and (b) The property to the north,of the 'subject site is vacant; Office/Professional, 'the property to the south of that' ite consists of vacant land, liquor store; Community Commercial 'District, tkie property to `the east consists,of shopping center; Community Commercial District, the property -to the.west'of the, site-consists--of vacant- building, roller~ rink and restaurant; Community Commercial D1atritt; and s PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO CUP 90-04 - JUNG M archL 28, 1.990 Page 2 (c) The subject property consists of a wide variety of uses, including restaurants, office and 'retail;, and (d) There is sufficient parking for the proposed use; and (e) Hours of operation are proposed to be. between 8:00 a.r . to 10:00 p.m. Monday through 'Sunday;, The majority of tenants' have operating hours of 1000 a.m. to S:QO'p.m. Monday through, Friday.' 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to'this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the. specific findin�is of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and.'2 above; this Conanission'.herPhy 'finds .and . concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use:is in 'accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the-Foothill 'Boulevard Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) •That the proposed use, together .with a the conditions applicable thereto, 'wili not be detrimental to ;the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to •,:properties or' improvements "in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use, implies "ith each of the applicable provisions of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and Development Code. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliarce with the California Environmental Quality Act of 197d 'and. further, .this Commission hereby issues a Negative DE!claration. 5. Basedupon the findings and conclusions set forth in'praraaraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the applicatidn subject to each and:every condition set forth below and in the attaches' Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by`this reference. Planning Division: 1) This approval shall apply to the liquor store use. only. 2) Approval shall expire, unless' extended by; the Planning Commission, if the building permits-are not issued or :approved' use has not commenced within twenty-four (24) month's from the date of approval. 3) ,Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with a.11 sections of the Develooent Code, Foothill' Boulevard Specific_ Plan, and ail ;other City' Ordinances. PLANNING, COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. CM 90-04 March 20, 1990 Page 3 p facility causes effects upon 4} Tf t{; o eration cf the adjacent )usinesses or operations, includings- but %not',J imiied to parking or ncise,. this Condiiiopol , UsE-'Permit shall be brought.back before the Planning Commission for consideration and 'passible termination of the use. 5} Occupancy of the facility :shall not commence until such time as_' 61 <Uniform Code;'and' State Fire Marsh 11's regulations have been complied with Pr ior} `'occupancy, plans shall be: submitted to th ~,, FootWsll Fire Protection District- and the Building and $,fety Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 6} Any sign' proposed for the facility shall be designed in conformance Wi"A the City's Sign Ordinance and any Uniform Sign Program for the complex', 4i.d _shall reluire review and approval:;3y the''PlanninP Division pviar to installation. 6. The Secretary to this Commission iihall cert:4y to the adoption, of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF MARCH, 1990, PLhNAING COMMISSION OF THE CIT'f OF RANCHO CUCA14ONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman; ATTEST: Brad Bullsr, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Corrltission of the City"' of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning I 'commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting,of the Planni`n9 Commission .hQid on the 28th day of Arch, 1990,` by the following vote-to-wit:' s AYESr COMMISSIONERS'. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS- --- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 28', 1990 TO: Chairman and Members.of the Pianning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, ;City ,Planner BY: Y,ince:Bdrtoni,; Assistant PI an SUBJECT: MODIFICATION'::.TO' ENTERTAINMENT KnMIT 89-04. - .PEPPER'S. MEXICAN RESTAURANT The review of a modification .to an approved entertainment permr.: ailo►aing iive�'.entertainmen,t in conjunction ' witti restaurant . use, located at: 9740 I9th. Street and' Archibald.Avenue - `APN: 1076411-10. r �t I. BACKGROUND: The Piaming"Cominlssion 'previously, approved an. Entertainment: , fermi for Pepper's �Nezi can:_,`.Restaurant on September 27,';1989. `The `permit al Towed for a. Single Rusician`nr small music combo to play:soft jaai` or ;por'mu5ic and permitted y: dancing'within the restaurant. _En tertainrt:en-was limited-to ,hree z, nights a week, Thursday th rough. Saturday, from 9:00 p�m.; to '12.30 a.m. The applicant',is requesting review and approval to ,add two, additional, nights of entertainment'on Tuesdays znd �9ednesdays and also to .extend': the,entertainment hours from 8:30''p.m. to 1:00 a.m. II. ANALYSIS: Mr and Mrs_ Bhatnagar are the owners and managers of Pepper's Mexican Restaurant., . and are "responsible for , the management of.entertainment. Tile facility is a full, service restaurant, offering alcoholic,, beverages including beer, wine, and ' hard .alcohol. Dancing will` be permitted in, an:: which totals . 146 square feet. (See Exhibit "B"). Per the ,provisions of Entertainment Ordinance Section SA LI 30 a security guard: is not "required as the dance floor .does not exceed 150. square feet. In accordance with. Section 5.12.040' of "the Entertainment Ordinanf:e, the applicant• hai`indicated that neither the applicant . nor any, persons responsible' for the management or supervision of, Pepper'i t Mexican Restaurant has, within_the previous;ten years, been convicted of a crime; nor has the` applicant ever had any permit or, license-issued'in conjunction with the sale>of alcohol. r. or the provision of entertainment revoked: 'f. ITEM G PLANNING coPmmi SIGN"'STAFF REPORT fP 80-04 - PEPP.ER'I'FERICAtd`,RESTAURANT MARCH 28, 190 Pa9e 2 The City Code Enfopcement Section, the Sheriff's Oep"art®ent;':and the Rancho Cucamonga•Fire• Proteation •D,istri'ctjhave not experien"ced. any problems with the"current_entertainme'{�t operation. P,epper.'s. is Tbcated p�ithin a Nei. hborhood".CommercfaT cenVer• .with retail, office, and restaurant use., :A significant numb er' of the. tenants, approximately ninety, percent, well be cjosed Fd���ej:ng.the hours the applicant is proposing tar':ptovide ent rtainment (see Exhiliit Sirah`i,lce,'.Cream�Shpp, Towrt & Country Ligdors, and StatEz-' Brothers, 'Ma'rket are. ,l,th"e�., only bus-inesses t4,'mainta'in_._operating hours du1 ring:Ithe proposed entertainment hours. '" Therefore, �Fi'rre should be minimal negative effects;in operational,conflicts v� th adjacent businesses, and the ,parking demand should, be more tfia"n. adequately met.. Should the operation of this Entertainment Permit cause adverse impacts upon adjacent businesses,_or`operations.J.ttray be .brou:ght before the Planning;;Commission for -the consicerat�on, and possible susperrsj'on " or revocation. of the permit, ;in.`'accordance with Sections L12.1:00 of-the Entertainment 'Ordinance: TTI. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Planning Commission; must make.";the'; ` following findirtgs 'p order "to approve ' the` moeataon.",`to Entertainment-Permit,:.o. 8g-04 ._ A., The conduct of the establishment or the 'granting bf "the application: rnauld .not `be "contrary. _�to the: public,.health, safety, moralsj'i or welfare B. The premises ar°establis"isment, is 'not 'likely to;be operated' in an illegal., improper;'or•;disorderly manner. C. The applicant; or' any other. person associated with him as' "principal -.or'partner, or, in a position or capacity: involving ' partial or total control over the conduact of'the business for= which such permit is," sought to be issued, hasp` not been . Convicted in any court of. competent jurisdiction of ?any offense involving the presentation; exhibition;,or,performance of any obscene show of`"any U,nd, or< of. a felony or, of~.any" crime involving:morai turpitude; nor has. had any approval,, ' permit, or, 14cense issued in `con unction wj;th, the .sale'"of alcohol- or`- the: provision,of .entertainment revoked ;Within the preceding five years, 0. That granting " the application would" not 'create a ;public .,, ` nuisance. - " PLANNING COMMI,S%OH .STJ�r REPORT EP 89-04 - PEPPER'4,EEX11AN RESTAURANT MARCH 28,,1990 Page 3 E That the normal aperati.on of the premises would not 3nterfe're f`. with the ::peace ;and- quiet of,> any surrounding residential neighborhood: F. That the applicant has. not made ,any :falsej misieading, 'ar i fraudulent_ statement, of material fact in the : required application. IV, CORRESPONQENCE This. tem has beerr`advertised`as a public hearing in. The `gaily Report newspaper and'; proper'!y posted,.'arid notices Sent to ad�acent� property owners within 300 feet,of the project V. RECO NOATI N Staff recopanends ;that the P11p�hing Commission con ti na1 y, : approve° . thy modification to Entertainment P mit, 9-Q rough adgpt on of the attached Resolution '-of prova Respe tful l Brad Buller. City Planne BB•VB•ml Attachments: Exhibit_°A'° -,Site Pian Exhibit "B" rloor Plan; , Exhibit "C" -`'Hours of ,Operation Resolution of Approva l t cr';.. ;uy'. e. .�,f u t ..YatK.�i �� � I m =a ���� { .� _ _ ��__��� � ,. ct :�. �. aaY:. � _ ��. u:. h tS"1 eta) _ ,'ice �1;� �lsi;� & - .� ���. a'' �4"+ ffi y... cr.� �` tin c�, � i� t. a ,. V _ _ �� f z v ,. 1 � � � � id � � �8 �_ 1 �. i�C iD �T ..� ( �;� ".^ w..a n.�.sw�� .� I i � �: ;. ..... �•R • NOS y�tt l; r ------------ v i jb n — Iq 4 .1 S ArJ •r. b 'oc I F� � r�- CITY. OP`h 114dio� L CANiO1VG TEEM. Modification to EP 8944 PLANNING-.DIVISION '['TCLE: Omar Plan j'� E?CH€M. B .:SCALE. N/A Wa Ift 5L Fnpwed Hftn of 9M pra 32 30 pm - stater Brother Center r* ss of Operation Century,23 971019th Stott Mon Fri. 3:30 am-7:00 pm Sat.-Sun. 50.rm-6:00 pm Stater Bratke 973019th St Most.-Sat- 700 am-10:00 pm Sun. 7:00 am-9•30 pm Checkers Beauty Salon 1976019th St Mon.-Fri. 9:00 am,9:00 pm Sat.-Sun. 9-00 am pm Town ds t:ountry Cleaners 976219th St Mon.-Fri. 7:00 am-7:00 pm QAt. 7:00 am-S--W pm Perry Chiropractic 976419th St... Mon.-Fri. 8:00 am-12.00 pml2 00 pro ti 0D per, Old Tyme Treasures 976819th St Mon:Fri. 104V am-6..00 pm Sat. 11:60 am-5000 pm .1iina Garden Restauarant 997019th St Mon.-Fri. 11:00 am-9:30 pus Sat.-Sun. 4.•00 pm-9:3D pm Dr.Sabicee 9778,19th St Mon.-Th. 9..00 am-6:00 pm Fri. 9.00 ani-1:0 pox" Best Video 978019th St TATh. 11:00 am4:00 psi, Fri.6r Sat. 11:00'am-W pm Sur. 11:00 am.8:00 pm More Real Estate 978219th St Mon.-Fri. 9:0 am-6:00 pm' Fantastic Saau 978419th St. Mon.Fri. 9:00 am-8:00 pm Sat. WD am-6-00 pm Sun. 1M ani-1:W pm Sarah's Ice Cream 978819th St. Mon.-Th. 11:30 am-10 00 pun Fri.&Sat. 11:30 am-10•.30 pm Sun. 2:30 pm-10.1a0 pm Town&Country Liquors 979419th St: Mon.-Th. 7:00 am-100 pot Fri.&Sat. 7s00 am-12.0 am Sun. 9:00 am-10--W pm Donuts ICnanes 9M 11219th St. Rion:Br1. 4:00&in—ZM pm Sat.&Sun. 5.0 am-12.dm pm Southwest Savings 979819th St Mon.Th. 90 am4:00 pet► Fri. 9:00 mn-6 00 pm z` ry F �Y CITY OF 'IL A^CLICAAlIQI<TCaA 1TEIVII MOdifiSatiOii to K 89-04 PLANT NI LTG`DM- SION ' TMY E' Hours of QL6t§tj6n _ EXHIBIT. Q SCALE- N/A RESOLUTION NO. A RESJLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,_ APPROVING A ,MODIFICATION TO >ENTERTAIN MENT PERMIT"89-04 TO ADD ADDITIONAL NIGHTS AND EXTEND THE HOURS ,ALLOWED TO •OPERATE 'AND CONDUCT ENTERTAINMENT WITHIN. .PEPPER``S MEXICAN RESTAURANT, LOCATED A7 9740 19TH STREET„- AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: ;1076-011-10. A. Recitals. ( ) On May 21, 1985, ne City Council of the City of.Rancho Cucamonga adopte' =Ordinance No. 290 providing for the regulation ;of entertainment. ..4 (ii) On •August 15, 1989, Jeanne Bhatnagar file '{for an application, for the issuance of an Entertainment Permit (EP 89-04), ('iii) On the 27th day of September,'1989,;the Rancho Cucamonaa'Planning Commission held a public hearing and approved the Entertainment Permit. (iv) On February 28, 1990, Jeanne Bhatnagar filed an application fora modification to Entertainment Permit 89-04. (v) On the 28th day of March, 1990, 'the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above-describe., modification. (vi) All legal prerequisites to .the adoption of thi '-Resolution 'have occurred. B. Resolution. NPW THEREFORE, ;the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolves as follows 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all, the facts set forth in the recitals, Part A, of this Resolution ,are true and correct.' 2. Based upon substantial evidencei presented to this Commission during the abovellreferenced RKrch'-28, 19,90'bearing, including written and oral staff reports, and the written, si/fined and verified, application of the applicant, together with public testimony,'this ;Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property ,located 'op the northeast corner of 19th I Street. and Archibald Avenue on' a ,lot ,presently improved With structures' and parking which .constitze • a Neighborhood Commercial Center, and 'F, . f, ,G PLANNING'COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, EP 89-04 - PEPPER'S MEXICAN RESTAURANT MARCH 28, 1090 > Page 2` (b) The property to the north of the subject site is a vacant parcel, to the south is a banking facility and a fast food-'restaurant, to the east is a Medium-High Residential use, and to the west is a vacant parcel and a Low-Medium Residential use. (c) Pepper's Mexican Restaurant is a full service,restaurant serving alcoholic beverages such as,be&.and wine. The proposed entertainment will be `_:ovide6 five nights.a weeks from Tuesday to;Saturday evenings, from 8:30 p.m. to 1:00 a.m. All entertainment;will be centrally located;w.ithin the facility and no admission fee wil'i'be charged. ,Dancing`will'ne permitted in a dance'area which totals 146,square'feet. 3. Based upon , the substantial,,, evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced March 28, 1990 public hearing,and upon the specific findings of,facts set forth in paragraphs 1 ah'� 2 above, this Commission hereby finds i,nd,concludes as follows,,_ That the conduct of the establishment or the granting of the application would rot be contrary to the public health, safety morals, or, welfare; and (b) That the premises or establishment are not likely to be operated in an illegal, improper,;or disorderly manner; and (c) That ithe applicant had not has any approval, permit, or license issued in conjunction with the sale of alcohol ,or the provision of entertainment revoked within the preceding five years;, and (d) That granting 'the application would not create a public nuisance; and (e) That the normal operation of the premises would not interfere w' she peace and quiet of the surrounding Neighborhood Commercial Canter, and. (f) That the applicant has not made any false, misleading ,or fraudulent statement of material fact in the required application. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions 'set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above., this Commission hereby approves the applf ation'sugject'to the following conditions: (1) This approval ,. is for a sing'ie musician or small 'combo (3 4 piece) to ploy jazz.or'soft pop music. Any change of intensity of type of entertainment shall require application: for. ` 1 - modification ,rf this .permit. (2) Dancing is permitted ,-an a dance floor area which does no,'t exceee'-.,146 square feet. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. EP 89-04 PEPPER'S MEXICAN RESTAURANT MARCH 28, 1990 Page 3 Aft '(3) ; If the operation of this Entertainment Permit causes any adverse, effects upon adjacent businesses.:or operations, the Entertainment Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for the consideration and po�,sible' suspension or revocation of the permit. (4) When -entertainment is being conducted, doors shall remain closed for noise attenuation purposes. (5) Hours of operation of the entertainment use shr,11 be Tuesday through Saturday, from 8:30 p.m. to 1:00 a.m. (6) Entertainment shall be conducted. inside the building unless written consent is obtained. from all adjoining tenants in conjunction with the Temporary Use Permit application process. (7) Any signs proposed shall be designed in conformance with the Uniform Sign Program and Aft the City's Sign Ordinance. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF MARCH', 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE.CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the. Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,' passed, and adopted by the Planning :Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a reg-,0ar meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of March, 1990, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: f ABSENT; COMMISSIONERS: �- - C� {; — — { CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA1,. STAFY REPORT } ' DATE March 28,1990: TO: Chairman and Members ofthe:Planning Commission'` FROM: Brad duller,;City Planner BY: Vince`Bertoni, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND COMDITIONAL USE PERMIT 9048 NGHIA THI '00 - Tha,,.request to establish a convenience store in a: Teased space of 1,750 square feet iwithin an existing. commercial center on 8.2 acres of land in the Community Commercial District, Subarea 3 of the Foothill L Boulevard. Specific Plan, located at; 9319 Foothill 4 Boulevard, Suite A APN: ,208-2617-58. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of;a non-construction Conditional Use Permit for a convenience store to be i;otated in an existing commercial center, -and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and 'Zonin` : orth Existing non-conforming hotel and single family dwellings; mixed use. Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (Subarea 3) South - Existing single family homes; Low Residential 'Ea st - Existing commercial; Community Commercial, Foothill Boulevard Specific 'Plan (Subs^ea 3)' West - Existing multi-family dwellings; Medium-High Residential, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. (Subarea 3) C. General Plan Desiunatiens: rojec� t Site -„Commercial (North - Commercial South Low Residential (East - Commercial (West - Medium-Nigh Residential- f' PLANNING COMMISSION,51AFF REPORT CUP 90-08 - NGHIA THI 00 MARCH 2%1, 1940 t Page 2� ) D. Site Characteristics: The project is developed .with an existing commercial,center. - fit E. ^arkinq_Calculations: Number of Number,of Type ` Square Parking spaces Spaces of Use Footage. Ratio Required"" Provided Convenience store 1,756 11250 7 7 (proposed) 7 Total 7 F. Applica6le>:Re ulations: The Foothill Boulevard Specific •Pian Subarea 3 requires .liquor stores> within the .-.Community i Commercial `District to obtain•a Conditi,A�nal Use".Perrt�; At the February '28, 1 :g0 meeting,: the"='Planning ;Commission" determined chat convenience. stows- are siviltIn—'to liquor" :Y stores and should be subject to ,the: same-,q,se regulations: }" This is the first application to be,, ,iubmitten since the use determination was made. .. . c �= r IL. ANALY...&: . A. nrneral:• The aaplicapt's proposal is for a convQrience store with a deli.:,to; incl'u,a. the sale of beer, wine, tad 1iquovl The del i 'w,ilI provide take'out'food "enl`y; no y seating will be provided. The proposed .hours of operation will be 'from<.,7':00 a.m to 1'1 00 p.m.: Monday thru Thursday; 7:00.a.'m : to 11:00 p.m. Friday and; Saturday; and 8:00 a.m. is 9:00 "p.m: on Sunday. The maximum number of employees on_the largest shift ' will be two. B. Issues: The primary issues related to locating this type.of use'iR a commercial setting are compatibility with su,srounding uses and parking availability. ;The following; secti,ons a8dress ane discuss these issues.: 1. Compatibility of,Uses:, There area variety of i'ousrnesses witbil,1the center. ' Office; restaurant, barber:'3nd ,beauty, shopsa cleaning "and - pressing establishment' furniture store, and general =retail are the types of,u es already, existing within this center. There is:currently- 31`,16B feet of unleased spaced 4r. t . PLANNING;COMMISSION STAG REPORT CUP 90-08,- NSHIA THI DO MARCH ',28, ItJO Page There'are existing uses similar to 'elements of the one proposed. The restaurant (Chuck E ,-,Cheese)' sells prepared food and the ;general retail stores sell prepackaged products. Therefore,;:staff believes that the convenience store "wi.11 not be incompatible, with '' 4he surrounding uses. 2. Availability of Parking: The., parking provided in 'the shopping center,at; this time,will be adequate for the proposed use (see parking calculations). Hdweve;, the center may not,have sufficient parking -in.the futuve when the,unleased it f;,,�l; accupied. This situation has occurred because Of! the restaurant and beauty shop uses that new occupy the center and require parking to-.ba provided at higher ratios than 1 space per50 syua:�_ feet of gross floor area provided. . Staff ,sill review future applications for compliance; with parking requirements`; 3. The Fi►.: District and Sheriff's Department have been contacted and do -not object to the proposed use. The fire District indicates that a plan. check' will ;be required prior to occupation- (Condition 5). C. Environmental Assessment: Upon review of Part 1 of the Initial Study and completion of Part 2 of the Environmental Checklist - staff has found no significant impacts related to a conveni °,r, . store use locating within this commercial center: III. FACTS FOR In order to approve this application, the following fink,,, heed to be made by the Planning Commission: A. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of tie Development Code, and the purposes of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan in which the site ;is located, B. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. - I C. The proposed use complies with each of the ;applicable provisions of the Development> Code and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public .hearing in The Daily Report newspaper, property posted, and notices sent ; ',. to all property owners and existing tenants within 300. feet of`tne Qh project. To date, onE phone call in opposatio4 to the, project has ` -' been received. tr�Y a OR7', PLANNIN& COMMISSION'STAFF'REP q r "CUP 90-U8 NGHIA'.THYj MARCH 28, 1990 Page 4 V. RECOMMEN I Staff ,recommen s:; approval of 'Cnnditional Use., Perm't 'gt!- .and 'ic§uance 'of;:a Negative Declaration through a pt on:o t e attached Resolution'of;Approval Res ctful F�F itt Brad Sul e City Plan er aB:VB: g . Attachments: Exhibit "A" Vici,rt ty{ Nap Exhibit "V* - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Floor,Plan Exhibit "D" - Letter from Applicant Resolution of Approval - I f� Lt i 7 , a I, � J o mom CIIUitli' 74 1 ;. a , '51 i; r=wl M CITY OF RANCRO-.CUCAI3l ONd. CUP 9048 I'LA1V MG'DI' IOP+� 1Y �l�d'LE: V?� NITV MAC EXIT HEiT:� A 'SCALE:h NE 4 5 rma�w[s�+termereu FOOT"" 60ULFWApp��� ' r sow.wur BLOM auxm • 1 I : a7a8A r;��ear, — ' ' — rsc 1lEL ; 1 i char ar. 1 •tea i SLI , tc OAK LYD. ' �^ I SC44, I I SS 1 — AF: I SR N0.4` '4E �<• I 40 48 r t 44% I r 1 1_ AITA410NE S -.. j HOUSE Of I I & iY a4 L 6�8 SA 33 SD 9F SSt rr rrrrr air r_FF F r ►r ;:T1 ri ti ; ' ` as taca �lor laa:s s i RFSWtdTtR6 ' I i { r " .. ,..K s ram,,.•H•' ,,, ',: 074 RANCHO,CUCAMONGA ntm.. CUP`0048_ Y`} PLANNING L3 ION j:,PL � ? AN 9d ." EXgi!DM: B. , -SCILF: NONE �. tM _ 5 H E• �.. v E S �o �i , 1G.� 1.v es, EN T;:;�N I._ W . l I n ��H saEw�s I a Ic �COK. CITY OF,'RANCHO v._.:MONGA, [rEM: CUP 90488 PLANNING,lDr MION It" FLOOR PLAN 7� EXFili�i'I'r C SCAML NONE' .r February'23, 199`0 The City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baselina,Road P.O. Box 807 Rancho 'Cucamonga'; CA 91730 . Attn: City Planner' Subject: Convenience & Deli ►tazket Gentleman: Our proposed Convenience & Deli rarket iC one among plenty of stores' In Foothill V111age sho 'Ing,'center, Located in 'Roncho':ueanonga's commercial district, an excellent visibility from Foothill Blvd,, and Hellman Avenue. In order to meet the demand of population. growth, and ,aovide`more convenience and save' to the',aurrounding neighborhood, V*V,high y request your approval of i�CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT on our,*' market.. We plan'to.cazry out mezchaa�ise similar,to "Seven Eleven" market inl the city, however out dellca.:�sen,;�si11 be:enzicYted with some Urienta'1 ,z favorite dishes such an eggroll, fried rice, roasted chicken. We may cozy out'a small quantity of collective. items such as` handmade gift, artwork. vw This is our family business,-.so vAr Vlan husbmnd_and wits asi..,�=n persons who run the market. a may hire another full tine 'e®ployee if workload required. Foicasting the growth-of our business,-number of employees on largest shift will:be three (3). The hours of operation: may be shorton accotding-to tusine", however we request the hours :from 7:00 as thru 10,-00 pa on Monday to Thursday, and 7:00 an thru 11:00 pa on Friday and Saturday,'and S.00`aa:'thru 9:00 pa on Sunday. While waiting tax your initial study and approval, we mould like to thank for yosx tim® GNd we are'looking forward to hear from you. If you need more information. from ua,'plaase let no know. I am at my work phone from 8:00aa to 5:00 'pa (714) 989-6431 east 161. sincerely yours, Hghia thi ao k . IECITY OF J;ANCHO'c a DU3COV PLANNING-TJM- SIGN LETTER FROM APPLICANT EXHIBM D SCALE' N/A -� RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY;Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA,-rALIFrRNIA PLANNING �COMMISSIOM APPROVING "CONDIT16ND'' -USE "'PERMIT. ` NO,, 90-08 FOR A CORVENIENCE STORE LOCATED IN A LEASED SPACE. OF 1750 SQUARE FEET WITHIN`AN. EXISTING, COMMERCIAL CENTER LOCATED ON 8.2 ACRES OF LAND IN, THE CommutiITY: COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, SUBAREA 3 OF THE.FOOTHILL BOULEVARD- SPECIFIC PLA@ty LOCATED As 9319 'FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, SMITE A, AND MAKING FINDINGS IR SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 203-251-58. A. Recitals.. (i) Nghi,a Thi Do has filed ;an appiication for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No, 90`-O8 as sc deribed . in the 'Citl,e of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Co,iditional U'se Permit request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 2Sth of March, 1990, the: Planning _Commission'`of t,le City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a .duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on`10at date. (ii ) All legal :prerequisites` ti) the adoption of this :Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW'ry THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga i as`,follows: I.' This Commission hereby Spec, fi Carl ?y finds that"all of the facts set forth In the Recitals, Part A, of this Reso.,lution are true and correct.' 't 2. Based upon 'substantial evidence presented to this .Commission during, the above-referenced public hearing on March 28, 1990, ' Inc luding written. and oral ; staff reports, together with 'public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The applica'jion applies to property located 'at 9319 Foothill Boulevard with a street frontage of 672 feet and 'lot depth of . 490.67 feet and is ,presently improved with a commercial center and parking spaces, and s (b) The property to the north of the -subect site is, an existing non-conforming hotel and single family dwellings, the prnpertY to. an south,of that site 'consists of-existing single family homes, the property to - the east is commercial and the ro ert' to the west,is existin multi, family p p Y 9 dwellings, and t PLANtM6 COMMISSION RESOLUTION No CUP' 9048 - NGINIA"THI 00 MARCH 281 1990 Page 2` (c) The, subject property, consists 'of a wi.de,.variety of uses, including a restiurant,,.real .,estate office,. 'c`,leaners, beauty s?�n, baft, er shop, and general retail s and, -, (d} There Yspufficiert parking available 'for the'' proposed use; and �t , ` (e) Hours. Of',opE rati�n are prla�7osed to ,be from 7:00 a.m. Ito 10:00 p.m., Monday through Thu,,sda,y; 7i00 a:m to, ;11:00 p m ,, Friday and Saturdays. and $ OD'.a.m. torOO�pg on Sunday .3; Based'upon'the smb`V4h�al+evid:a�ce presented to this"Commmission during" the above-.referenced ;p*,611ic t�3arinn and,upott t!4e specific findings of facts 'set forth in paragraphs S And,// 0.0vz, thls r; ission hetireby�#rods and concludes as followsf. j (a) That,:the proposed u'se ifs�'in accord,witl'•�the General 'Plan,' the obieti:tives of the DcselopmQnt.Goda�, tF'e"footi►i;t] Boulevard Specifial'P Ian,:•.and the Warn les�of they-distri t. in.wh7 h"tlie site: s located. (b) That the 'proposed use, together, smith the conditions applicable thereto,.witl not be detrimental,to the ,pub iic' health sa#ety, or welfare, or materially injurious topropertiesor. improvements inthe yieinity. (c) That the proposed-, use compli �s� with each of" the applicahle- provisions of the Aevelopment_Code. 4. This Cormrtission'hereby finds an certifies, that..ths Project has been reviewed and considered irt;,:compliance �'?th the California Shy ronmental Quality Act of 19,7tI, and `further, this; Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration, 5. Based ;upon the findings and conclusions set forth 'in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and`4 above,, this; Cotmnission hereby approves the application subject to each and :every condition set forth below.' Planning Division-*, ,. I 1) This appro�alf �5ha11 apply to the cohvenience:_ store use pnly ?r 2} Approval shall' expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission,;=if.-building :pern►its are not .issued or:,approved use has not caapnenced siithin =twenty-four .(24} mgnths froth the date oi: aApro Val `. y- f " RESOLUTION ND A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF,RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORWIA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING .CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 90-08 FOR A CONVENIENCE STORE LOCATED IN• A LEASED SPACE OF 1750 SQUARE FEET WITHIN AN 'EXISTING COMMERCIAL CENTER LOCATED ON 8.2 ACRES OF LAND IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, SUBAREA 3 'OF THE ,FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT 9319 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, SUITE A, AND MAKING FINDINGS TN.SUPPORT_ THEREOF - APN; 208-261-58. A. Recitals. t (i) Nghia .Thi .Do has filed an. application for the. issuance of Conditional Use, Permit No. 90-r?w.rlas`' described in the title, of this Resolution. Hereinafter in thi,h ,P.asolution, the subject ,Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "t application,° (ii) On the 28tFi of Ma[,`cli; 1990, the _Planning Commission. of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conductc'o a duly noticed public _'hearing on the application and concluded said hearinil on that date. (iii') All legal prerequisites to the adoption af"` this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is: hereby found,. determined and--resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of' Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby .socifically f nd_ that a1-11 of the facts set forth in the R.eciitals-,, Part A of this Resolution are true and correct..` 2. Based :upon substantial evidence'. presented to this ;Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on March '28, I990, ,including, written and oral' staff ;reports, together with, public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a)' The application appr to property located at 9319 Foothill'-Boulevard with a street'frontage. of 672 feet and lot depth of 490.67 feet andis presently improved with a -commercial center and parking spaces; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is an existing non-vonforming hotel and single family'didellin9s, the property to the south of that site 'consists of existing single family homes, the property to the east is commercial, and the property to the west is existing multi-family dwellings; and -i PLANNING COMMhSSION,:RESOLUTION NO CUP 90-08 - NSHIA-THI DO` MARCH 28, 1.990 Page 3, 3) Approval of, this, request shall not Waive compliance wfth all sections of the Development Code, Foothil1`'Noulevard Specific Plan, and ail other City Ordinances. 4) If the operation of the facility causes adverse effects,upon adjacent busi,i(esses or operations, includVvig, but not lim tedlto parking or noise, this Conditional Use 'Pek""It shall be brought back before the Planning' Ccmmission for consideration and possible ;Jrmination of the use. ,,.. 5) Occupancy of the farjIity shall not commence until such time as ,a11 Uniform Building ;Code and State Fire.Marshall's regulations have been complied with: Prior to occupancy,'-plans shall be submitted to the Foothill Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show. compli'ance�;• The 'building shall, he inspected for compl-ia46e prior to occupancy'. 6) Any sign proposed for the facility shall be designed in conformance with the, City's Sign Ordinance and any Uniform Sign Program for the. complex, and -shall require revie_v 'and approval j by the Planning Division prior'.to installation.'° 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. , t APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF MARCH, `1990. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE.CITY .OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ;r Larry T. McNiel, Chairman Y ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary N-11 PLANNdN&'COPiNISS.ON RESOLUTION NO CUP 90-09 - 'WiiA THT b0 FIARCH 28, 1990 Page 4 I, Brad Buller,"Secretary of the ;Planning Commission of the City, of Randho Cucamonga, do hereb '!certify "that the foregolncj Resolution was duly and regularly introduced jpassed,. and° adopted by the Planning Commission of the . City of'"Rancho Cucamonga,�iat"a regular meeting of the Planning Commission nerd on the :28th day of March,,'1990,,by'the following vote-to-wits ' AYcS; COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIOjiERS: ABSENT: COMMIS5IONERS:r i+ tf 1J s �l f �t 1I CITY OF RANCHO,CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT .*06 , SLATE: March 2SO 1990 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Barrye it. ''Hanson, Senior,;Civil Engineer BY: Betty Miller, Associate Civil ;Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL' ASSESSMENT AND VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 12781 - subdivision of 9.35 acres of landinto 3 parcels in tne, ngmum- Impact Heavy Industrial District- Subarea 9 of the Industrial_Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of Jersey Boulevard and Rochester Avenue (APN 229-111-07) I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION•; A. Action Requested;' Approval of the proposed.?►isting Tentative arcel map as s oun on Exhibit "B" B. Parcel Size: Pa.'cel 1 - 2.7 acres, net Parcel 2 - 2.2 acres, net Parcel 3 - 3.0 acres- net Total- 7.T acres, net C. Existir,g Zoning: Minimum Irvtlact Heavy Industrial, Subarea 9 of the inaustrial 3pecjTiC Plan D. Sur -vending Land Use: anufacturing (Schlosser Forge), partially developed along Arrow Route South - Warehouse/Distribution Center East - Warehouses Best - Industrial Complex under construction (DR 88-36) , E. Surrounding Generai Pl6h and Development Code Designations: or - 14151-R=560act Heavy Industrial South - Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial East - General Industrial West - Minimum Impact. Heavy Industrial F. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant and slopes to the south f at 2 percent. ITEM L� j 'tr ; z , { it Pt.ANffIN6 COMMISSION.STAFF 1EP.ORT VESTING TENTATIVE PARgEL MAP 12781 - DELGAR MARCH 28, 1990 PAGE 2._' II. ANALYSIS: The purpose of this parcel map is to create three 138h corresponding to the three warehouse buildings previously ap<R... ;:3 as Development Rovi44 No. 87-56 (Exhibit C), which is currently being plan 1 checked. �7he,City Planner has determined that the project is exempt from the standard fiva-Acre' minimem parcel size requirement of Subareas 9, because it is an approved master planned developzaent. The conditions o approval require the construction. of Jersey Boulevard along the north project boundary, widening Raehester Avenue on `the east side and completing Boston Place, including $ ft, drainage: improvements,' on the west side; III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The applicant completed Part Y of the ::Initial StuoT Sfaffcoraucted.a field investigation and comoleted Part 3I of the Initial Stuth+. No adverse ;impacts upon 'the environment are anticipated as a,result'of this project. Therefore, issuance of Negative Declaration is appropriate. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: ' Ifotices of. Public. Nearing have been sent to,surrounding propery owners arid, placed in theL Daily'Report Newspaper.- Posting at the site has also beerl completed.. V. RECOMKENDATIOR.-_``It is recommended that the Planning Commission consi.der I all input-ate' Ooments of the Vesting Tentative Parcel .Map 12781. If after such consideration, the Commission can recommend approval,:then the adoption of the 'attached -esolution and issuance, of a' Negative Declaration would Wa_ppropriate. Respectfully submitted, Barrye R. Hanson Senior Civil Engineer' BRH:BM:sf e Attachments: Vicinity' Map (Exhibit "A"',' Tentative Map (Exhibit W) Approved. DR 87-56 (Exhibit "C") Resolution and Recommended Conditions Of Approval i - r r� t .� tJ L_L g • g :. I, tad _ 1 $+ t l , to CL BOSTON PLO' pp � t ^ • 1 . 7z OR lif = I , Vie` I RESOLUTION NO. . A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA;'_' CALIFORNIA, ;CONDITIONALLY .APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE'PARCEL;MAP.,NUMBER 12781, LOCATED AT'THE SOUTHWEST CORNER Or" JERSEY BOULEVARD AND ROC_HESTER AVENUE - APN 229=111-07, 'AND:9AKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF ' WHEREAS, Vesting ,Tentative Parcel Map Number...=12781,. submitted' b ` Delgar Partners, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 3.parcels, the " real property situated, in the ,City of Rancho Cucamonga, County, of San Bernardino, State of California, identified 'as APN 229-111-07 located at the southwest corner of Jersey Boulevard and Rochester Avenue;,and WHEREAS, on March, 28, 1990, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing far the above-describe(' map,. ' NOW,-THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING',COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION is ?That the following find;ngs have been ma11 de: 1. That7the nap-is with the General .P1an:, 2. That the 'improvement of the propo§ed subd`ivision ist} consistent with the General Plan. 3. That <the site is physically' rsuitable for the proposed development.. 4. That the proposed subdivision and; improvements will ; no l nvironment moi l r public health,_problems or have adverse,affects ''on. abutting, r; property. SECTION 2: This Commission finds and certifies that: the ,project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the ..California Environme.ntal Quality Act of 19701 and, `further;, this Commission hereby issues a. Negative Declaration. 5ECTION 3: That.Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No., 12781 is hereby approv,ed,subject to the attached Standard Conditions and'the following Special ;Conditions• 01, 1. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications) . ' 2a; on the project §ide of-Rochester Avenue shall 'be' undergrounded from the first pole on.ihe north side of Jersey Boulevard to the first pole;off-site south` f� r- F r k.'• �4 PLANNING C©MMISSION`RESOLUT'ION VESTING TENTATIVE `PARCEL. MAP 12781 - DELGAR MARCH 28, 1996 ' PAGE 2. I of the ' pro3ec t .sogth boundary, prior to public improvement acceptance ;or, occupancy,;.. whichever occurs first. In'" addition, an ' in-.lieu fee as contribution;to the:u6dergrdunding ;of the utilities on the opposite -side of Rochester, Avei'ue shai be paid to th' , :ity ;prior o .•issuance' of huiTd.ing permits fee shall b'e ona-half the difference be,t►leen the!,undergrounding cost of the utilities (electrical) , on the opposite: side` of they street minus'tho'se ,(telecommun", , ns)'on the project`.side times-.the length from the>cente"r of Jersey Boulevard to the south'k`project boundary. 2. Construct. Boston Place, full curb to=curb Width, I, - , . including ,street Ii;9hts, from the intersection`,iuith . !, 3ersey Boulevard, south to',complete'" .,t of cul-d`e-sac bulb. Thki, Developer, may reque t a reimbursement agreement, to recover . :;the cost o,f off-site improvements" from adjacent property': upra its, development'. If` portions :of these improvements are cori'structed" by u'thers,'fith;is developer, hall ;honor . any reimbursement ' agreeaments applicable to the project-frontage... ' 3. Install stOm drainage facilities as determined by` ','. the final "drainage study approved by the City Engineer. ' 4, Easements for on-siie drainage reten*ion-areas chalk be del nested and inundation rightt-dedicated on the Final Parcel Map. The retention.area"s shal1. be t. . designed .to limit the maximum pondipg";depth to'12 inches and '18 inches in parking and: maneuvering areas for auto To il:es and trucks., respectively, , In no case shall the pooding depth exceed:6 inch''es aor- more than 4hours'. No public water sha,`i „be tributary directly to the on-site.retention areas: . , S. The portion of`the.project;along"Rochester Avenue is. ,: located in 'a Flood Zone °'A; ` therefore., Flood,::` protection, measures shalt be provided upon development .as certified'. by a Registered 'Civil Engineer, and approved by -the City,Engineer: c / PLANNING COMMISSION,RESOLU =nN " > VESTI1%TENTATIVE;,PARCEL MAP 1?781`- DELGAR MARCH,.28, 1990 PAGE 3 � r't APPROVED ANO ADO PTED„THIS, 28YH DAY OF MARCH 1990,y PLANNING COMMIS5IOii:OF TtjE iCTfOF RANCHO'CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McHiel, Chairman:, ATTEST• Brad Buller, :er'etary I; Brad Buret, "Secre'tary .-of. the Planning Commission•'of .the City .af Rancho Cucamonga, do fiereh''r certify that the; foregoing Resolution ►aa's ;duly. 'and regularly iptroduced, "passed, and' adopted,,by the. Planning;Commission' of :the City of Rancho Cucamonga; ai a,reguTar meeting of the Planning G`mmissi,on held, on the 28th-day of"March1990;-by thn following "gote to AYES: COMMISSIONERS; ' t, NOES: COMMISSIONERS:: ABSENT: COMMISS%ONERS: 3 f. 4� r _ � s� F: z Le Yp pC N �sCgy� ` �+.o a`[FCiO Lp NRX 5.7. YC yt E �jUd.v i@a1�- �VC rvY Lp� OOJ L tw �4 Ow. je, E ZI t�-W L �, d. '•/` CC.� WY QyY � C CO�a GS�1C ,.gib �•C:. I el V1, _.. y II 0 y ct u Fr `O4Y`C,.. (Yyl f/��• �p[p> .al� o� PTI L. .9y gs 6� Y L C �' 9 O i ^1A +Ny \ \ w � � N G O u ■�-� -� w�0 N Y y !�: G y e » N` O i • a g C 1, a w Y Y Y .N O 9 0 Y Q L Y ~ Y � 'O� 0=:o w OO .iO ��O/,C N MLy Op• � Z Y � tl q �\ 1 � YN 6 O R YY:.L� •CB�V IY 4l':' 4�N,..e Y Y c is wY pw 8pY m 2 p I a �. O. E;OQ J Y pr j a O • V d.r p j N:y q p 0= J a Ow O > Oy�Y -rCW CSC _ 6 :Yy y_ O ' � J Y +.O Y C L Y u !y p + - a G Y c i'mom -N3 Is ` a w9 wV Oy'C paw C.O.'• G aZ` +L �YN VOG Hr OII. Y sYO j U Me O p® O y p C w G y! ) G Y(f C@ V .r O LL a OO uY C i GGG '. LN VNw ' L q•.,* OYN Yr� Owl C-�. , VyV y G �00 O�Gw... O O C L N C COL qY O�Yuy Al ub 3C.G OY 4s 06Yqq w.: rOi 1plg,G a jao :y- Y O. NY M .. :Y{L,� L■py,�_ ..� • Lim S�� Lff 9q w PC � wN LOj pC� a, a. '_l LW A E'.�V•� ELa Y.OJob CO: CL is 13 a:- V O e yy Cpg Y Nc a�. qg �g i, Ls cf �w � Cam, vN R Na V ct it C Vw w■■N G `�YC �ayw ® CH VL y O O C S GY + qc y.O�v YO'QY N wE Op VY.O. YE Y` ON �' Oa4 ...ED Y -illI J%w L`aO : a.E'oa Y .V. a p Y OL fly ANA N M f O V ON n- CITY OF.RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPO1R,T M� DATE: March 28, 1990 TO: Chairman and Members, of the Planning Conmission FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, ;Senior Civil Engineer BY: Ping Kho, Assistant Civil'.Engineer SUR%°CT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMERT AND TEW, TIVE PARCEL MAP 12338 - KENSLEY'- BUFFALO SIX - u v s u:r o�'7"3:-n7acres or'-1an�`{n parcels In e- eneral` Industrial District (Subarea 11'), :located at the northwest corner of 6th Street and Buffalo Avenue EAPH 229-2f2-28) I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:, A. Action Requested: Approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map as shown' on W1 01 r. ".e° . B. Parcel size: Parcel I 5.04 acres '— Parcel 2 1.71 acres Parcel 3;- 1.41 acres- Parcel 4:'- 5.62 acres Total- 13.78 acres C. Existing Zoning: General Industrial District (Subarea 11) . 0. - Surrounding Land Use: North -, Existing industrial building South - Vacant East - Existing industrial building West - Existing industrial building E. Surrounding General Plan'and Develorkent Code Designations:- North - General Industrial District South - General Industrial,District East - General Industrial District West - General Industrial District >' ' TEk J i - 1� P.'-AFININO COMISSION STAFF REPORT TEHTATIVF PARCEL FLAP 12338 - ;XENSLEf-BUFEALS SIX1,LTD. MARCH 289 1990` PAGE-2 F. Site Characteristicsi The site is developed with:- existing Wildingsi< I'I. ANALYSIS: The purpose of this parcel map is to separate a previously` approveg development into 4 pariils.' 'Th6 development was approved by the Planning Commission on June il, 1986, for the construction of, 3 industrial buildings as CUP' 86-P6. All 3 Oildings have been constructed. <5i 111. €NVIROHM60-AL REVIEW: The applicant completed Part." I Sf `the" Initial Eq.- 7S fal T f can ucte-d�a, field investigation and completed Part II of the Initiai Study,. No adverse ,impacts,. upon the environment are anticipated as a result of this project. Therefare'-•issdance of negative Declaration is appropriate. - - IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices,4. Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding,. r property owners and placed in the Paily, Report Newspaper. Pasting. at U site has also been compl;eted., V. RECOMMENDATIM It ir, recownded' at the. Plannin4-Commission consider a npu• an elements of, the-''"Centati've_ Parcel Map,:12338.' If after such consideration, the ,Commission can recommend approval, them the adoption of the attached'Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would, be appropriate., Respectfully submitted, Barr_ve R. Hanson Senior Civil.Engineer r SRH:PK;sjia Attachments: vicinity Flap (Exhibit`"A") -,,.Tentative Rao (Exhibit "B"? Resolution and Recommended Conditions of Approval- A `= -n Nj A3n ;t �!l31m?GH �> z :311tl'�011t�jd1B r. m � n�saa�a 3nh3AVi N33A1'63t J N3AVIN` r, 4 yy 07djj Lij "a9 s 94 / ♦fie j�L. 1 ���.�L• .��---'ice '1•�_ ft ✓�.�.il. '.� .,:.�• / 1e1 V °y _RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION •OF THE PLANNING•COMMISSION OF THE CITY .OF . RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA„ CONDITIONALLY' APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL _t1.4P NUMBER 12338, ° LOCATED %AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER%'OF 6TH" STREET "AND BUFFALO AVENUE - APN 229-262-28, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF WHEREAS, Tentative: Parcel Map Number 12338, submitted by'Kensley- Buffalo Six, Ltd., applicant, for'ti;? purpose of subdividing into 4 parcels, the real property situated in the City=of Rancho Cucamonga. County of San Bernardino, State of California, identified as APN(s)'229-2F2-28, located at the'northwest corner of 6th Street and Buffalo,Avenue; and VNEREAS, on March 28, 1990, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public, nearing for<the above-described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings,have beep `made: That the map is consistent with.the General Flan. 2. That the improvement of the proposrdy.subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. Y 3. That the site is physically suitable• for, the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2:L This Commission finds and certifies that.the project has been reviewed and considered in cmpliance with "the California Environmental Quality Act 'of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. SECTION 3: That 'Tentative Parcel Map No. 12338 is hereby approved subject to the attached, Standard Conditions and the following Spec,ia'F Conditions 1. Record a reciprocal parking 'agreement concurrent with the map. 2. ' The 20-foot-vide sewer easement to Cucamonga County Water District along the project westerly boundary , AhalI be shown on the Final Parcel Map, f f i5 PLANNING COMMISSION gESOLUTION N0. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP; 12338-- KENSLEY-BUFFALO "IJX, LTD., -') MARCH.28, 1950 PAGE 2 v- 3. Landscape the 3th Street median island (full width) from Pittsburgh Aver, to Buffalo, Avenue. ' A separate landscape;:and irrigation plan per City standards shall be provida subject tb. the apprpval of the. City;Engineer. The Developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of the landscaping in excess, of the cost 'of the,•one-.half width of the landscaping fronting his project from future development of adjacent and acrsss. the street properties. However, if the Develloper on the opposite .side of 61:K� Street install the median island landscaping, then the Develop.- for ,this "roject (APN 229462-28), shall pay,an in=Lieu` fee for the cost. of one-half-;the Width of landscaping fronting hit,projec.t. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF MARG1,';�, 1990., PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO;`uA r BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad. Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, 5ecretary` of the. Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing,,Resolution was. duly :and regulLrly introduced, passed, and' adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission hel;w, on, the 28th day of March, 1990, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COd7MISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS• - Y z _ i yr � to Lam ® a ®•ag A m �rtg ® .6oC tT g q®r w 4 q�w On 0py/ wy Y`i G NY s yOS° m°� yq= Oho' `6c ..OM.a• .�. S K� alb bDw ffi nV�+Hb�V rB _ Mys — ` I1 rp s b' �fl �r• � �•Y �� �!y ®�Y ..aim . 1 �� b g r d a —aI 'fir gji •` v�ao 3 ` 3 � •r. 0� i:ti YM RB OA;b� 6�Y WY :Yr Oi.'rSOq % A N —sue, (t\tAM u.. .pac f uT♦ »+ ^y e.� �rt pp V f. S s ;,• J y � � MD O6 a of G' oa. yo a �a c a Vz o'•a o NC O Sax Z-.iV `4� MG cOV M. - C O LM:Y pp q$Y ^.�ryy uyy yC®qC OUW �•as O%�K�:. „y O.L4 rA J .O •`n= cuu.; ,Rum :ice» au� $eo '•�+3' $~1�g 10d a + 21, _.ovo i a a eYi p �M p O$ ti S$ b �W Y._OT LOM NO V �D W !Y S Pi.1 Ww NwM I' 1 N'm So. * A « „ CiN oc. Ya fir::; as iS+gn St Yp �u Y go e oPx ITZ $$ a Y at _ A r� �L CITY OF RANCHO:CUCAI,AMOA ST F REMIT r- :U 'DATE: March 28, 1990 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Ping Kho, Assistant.Civil; Engineer SUBJECT: EtiUIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AHD TENTAl,IiIE`PARCEt MP 12756 - LEISERV, - A subdivislop.of 7.u6 acres,,of fand -into Z parce s n e,: pnzral Co=-rcia];devei'apment,.District, located at;the 4est side of H ven Avenue and north of Foothill, Ovulevard (APN 1177-401-29) ' I. PF(WECT AND SITE nESCRIPTION: A. Action Regce'st_3':`- Approval of the proposed Tentative Par���.A%ip as. s own on x "B° B. Parcel Size: Parcel 1 -. 1.78 acres Parcel 2 - 5.25 acres Total T.133 acres C. Existing Zoning: ;General Commercial D. Surroundingg' Land Use: North reL ,;Drainage Basin or South -Commrcial-project (Virginia Dare W`hery) East -Terra Vista Planned Camunity West -Deer Creek Channel and Existing, Icdustrial (Data Design) E. Surroundin General Plan and'Develop2 nt Code Designations: 1Tori n.Fl000 Control, Open Space. South - General Commercial East -: Terra Vista Planned Comuitity West, - Industrial Specific Plan Area F. Sit% Characteristics: The site is a deveti ed shopping center. 11. ANALYSIS: The purpose of:--this parcel is to divide a port`-' ' of a prevTously approved develop ent into- 2 parcels' The division of land will separate the bowling facility fwm riii retail 'eenter. ITEM X PL1aNNING CoftSIP SIQA! STAFF IiEPQETr''' T-ZATIVE PARCEL PiAP 12756.:.•LIEIS£Rd, IF'C: HARCN`28, 1990 PAGE 2 III.-ENdYRONtNTAL _REV IEN: ' Y9ze' applicant completed Part T of thee Initili u con acted a field'.Investigatio� and'complet6d Part .IT -of the Initiiai Study, Na adverse impacts, upon' the enuir'an�aer�t" ,are anticipated as.a result of`this prpject;�7herefore, issuance of';Negative Dec!aration,'js appropriate;" Id. CORRESPONDENCE:' Notices.al•-Public Bearing have been-sent to surrounding proper owners-and placed in the Deily Report Newspaper.; Fosting at,:the site has also been cosap7eted, V. RECOMMENDATION: ' lt`'is' reCo nded that the`O. anning_Ci uission,.consider zl liil"�`npu an elements;of the'Tentative"Parcel Map_.T °56. If after such consideration; the CoMjssioN Can.reso>ouend; apprgval then the adopti*sn 3 of the, attached Resolution and12Assuanee of a:Negat ve DeClaratian iaould € be appropriate. Respectfully submiiaed, Barrye R. Hanson Senior C vil k-ginee;y BRH•PK:sfm Attachments: vicinity Map jExhibit "A") Tentative Map (Exhibit 11B°) Resolution and ' Recommended Conditions of ,Approval , , a �y .'a'. �ql� i�o' ` +j ►'. , pia � _�_ �iu 1 li■ g r$gl��h r r r y, r■�� r - ,= s � iiiii fillrs7- .�i o anneal all N r ® Nltr riNi� tIr MIN BomMU 1; = r■rr■r■■r ■■.■.■ , fill l`�!■rdHriN i®■f '"'� ■illfi►'9■r■■■■■■w■rl■io■r.7 r.. ' ': ill oii■ aii li !. ■U. .� VAR—af■ ■■■Q■r■ ul R`rliii . ii ■i■■var :. rrrr■ u■ru uir run■n■r .0 N6, ieutr.. Ow f 4 4:A -y } t v f 4 � 1 I I 4 J � ! �lLit t I I I crry OF =e PARCEL MAP +2-01 tll RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE:- HE PLANNING -COMMISSION OF THE, CITY. OF ,'.. ` RANCHO :000aMONGA, CALIFORNIA,`; CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVa PARCEL MAP 'NUMBER .12756, 'LOCATED AT THE 'WEST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE AND`;NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEYARD N 1171�401 24 AND MAKING FINDINGS ,Ik SUPPORT THEREOF WHEREAS, Ten' Parce')' Map Number;12756; submitted by; Leiser%_ Inc., applicant, far f'�e ;purpose of--ti di'vid' ng ,into 2 parcels, the real property. situated ,in the .City of;Rancho :Cucamonga,. County of San •Bernardino, State of California, ide,Itified 'as APN(s) 1177-401-2%* locoted at.the west side of Haven,Avenue and n5rth o..f, 'Foothi ,'.Boulevard; antl WHEREAS, on 'March 2&i 1990, the, Plzaning 'Conmission held -a duly advertised public hearing 1'Qr7the dbave-dF•scribed;map, NOW, THEAEFORE,; THE EYANCHO CUCAMONGA`PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings-have been,'made:. 1. That the map is consistent with the Genera7�Plan. 2. That.the improvement of the proposed ,subdivision is consistent with the;Gene`ral .Plan. 3. That the,l site is; physically_ suitable for;. the . `'proposed development. 4. That-the proposed subdivision and `improv"I, nts wili" ;. not cause substantial environmental damage?;or public health problems or,hAVe"adverse affects on abutting property. ` SE07ION 2: This Commission finds and certifip s� that the '�roject;ha's been reviewed and considered in co; mpliance.with th.c alffornia Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further,, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration.: SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel 'MapNo. 12736 'is-hereby approved subject to the attached; Standard Conditions and.:ths ..follow 'ng, Special. Conditions: 1. In order to provide equivalent, fire protection,of.' openings ,along the newly establ isried'.property 'vines,' the folle ing shall :be,provided (a); Veri�fcation �'af one-hour fu°,� resistive- ` comkOuction of canopy at, the retail center to a d,�etance equal to the depth of the canop'i �n .` R�5� PLANNING "COMMISSION RESOL,OTIOWNO. TENTATIVE PARCEL'NAP '12756 LEISERv, I.K. MARCH 28, 1990. 'SAGE 2- the northern=most property, line beyond p p y ti adjacent,, th. be completed prior to recordation of the Final Maps (b), Install an approved fire sprinkler, system along the canopy;as,outlined in item (a) above, (c) c•lecord the. amended ' CC&R's' preliminarily approvedi by.theLRuilding and Safety Division,, canc4rrent. with • the :reap. & cop, of :the recorded document'shall !he;provided'vto Building r= and Sa.fetyzQivision wediateTy thereafter, 2. Rpco.ipd,° a reciprocal parking agreement concurrent.- wit he map.::. 3. An in lieu fee as , contribution tz,, the future, undergraunding, •of the existing overhead u Alities . (electrical,,,except ;for.the`66 KV electrical)r�rn; the, opposite side of Haven Avenue shall be :'pal to, ttie• City prior",to . the approval of kthe fna� .�parcel " map. The fee shall be 'one-half the,'drfference between .the..undeigrounding; cost of the utiliaies (electrical) on the .apposite side of .the street minus ; ' those., (recently undergrounded telecommunication)' on the; project. side, .times. .the length 'of the 'project ,frontage (approximately 446, feet). APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS'.28TH DO OF MARCH 1190. �1* PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE°CITY,OE RAHCHO. 000AMONGR r; BY,_ Larry T. McHiel, Chairman ATTEST,: Brad Buller, Secretary r PLANNING COMMISSIOH'RESOLUTION lyQ, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 12756 - LEISERV, INC'. MARCH.8;29SQ. PAGE 3' f I, Brad Puller; Secretary_ of the, Planning Commission of then.City of .Rancho Cucamoga, do' hereby .certify ,that the.; foregoing ,Resolution was`;duly and regularly .introduced, passed, and: adopted by the Planning Coamission of the City of Ranchd Cucbmonga, at a regular meeting of the Plann.ing, Commiss`ion hEId on the' 28th day of March, 1990, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS': NOES: COMMISSIONERSc ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: l �t 4 1/ it �� .: • .ytea �� � c � _ �ai� �$$ �'�� it ►� Yre� �M r.• �. p o r A lit H a s a f:wra 9Aj • w �•w w w Y O Y 113 6ry6 M aa iz z lit ae _fi rA u e s a r. yp e g t Yo Y1 iy7 g+ * 1 �ga �� ffffSm $ r dig m c4 .. O N as. J r O r u 01 � C L �� uY. O u ' P!! K�Y A G R'y w L r co Sy aa• aua pp O CC " g v1-e Cpr. . S G O .2-2 �'OdJe 4 t "c 2_m $-YC .U�a a q au ram` $ < �, :�� F+�- -q_ - aM �e, •.N OO VYVF.: PZ -N 4� YH `Y � CYYY$ Y;y Yam. Y ' lji9 Lw 1y w oq QYWw WpWa ► emu.. ••n O�yTt' —.s E $off_ W' O M d w C LS LIE O G�8 6C r G OY OY O w qQ M-I -t 3 w O "�O• �.�S O.a Y.:®4 < O G R Y i `CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA i S` "F REPO i DATE: March 28, 1990 . TO-i Chairman and Membr,' of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, ;City Planner " BY Tom Grahn, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL 'ASSESSMENT ANQ TENTATIVE TRACT',4'459 - t.A. CHANCO - A residential subdivision of 37 single family lots on 8.3 acres of land` in the Low`Medium Residential District (4-8 dwell=ing units per acre),, located at the southeast corner 'of' Archibald Avenue and Lemon Avenue - APN: 20I-251-3, 4, 40 and 41.' Related to this project is Tree Removal Permit 88-63 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:Adak �. A. Action Requested: Approval of the Detailed SJte Plane Grad`inct Plan, Landscape ' Plan, building. elevations, Tree Remova�i• Permit, and the issuance oi a Negative Declaration. B. Pro. ect Density. 4.45 dwelling units per 'acre. C. Surrounding Land Use and.Zoniho: North - Existing. single family r�+,sidences tow Residential District (2-4-,dwellin;_�t!nits per acre) and ;Low f` Medium Residential DistrfA (4-8 dwelling units per acre) South - Existing single family residences,, Low Md�,.m Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) East - Vacant Low Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) West - Existing single family residences; Low Residential Oist.,Ict (2-4 dwelling units per acre) - Q. General Plan Des', nations: Project Site - l.ow Medium Residential North - Low Rasidential and Law Medium .Resi'dential South - , Low. `ilium Residential Cast - Lor Aium Residential' West - Lo,(-Residential ITEM T,A ,Y PLANNING COFtiISSION ST.AWkFPORT EA S 1T144F9 - L.A. 'CHANCO l ' March 28'i 1990 r Page 2 E. Site Characteristics: The site is predominantly vacant, the` only structure on site is a dilapidated 'barn located south of the existing single .family ';residences at the '.corner of Archibald 'Avenue'and Lemon Avenue. The site slopes to'`the south at a grade ranging from 3;'to 5 percent. Existing trees consist of two (2)'Eucalyptus windrows, a small Lemon Grove, one (1) Coast Live Oak tree, one (1) Palm tree, and three (3) Incense Cedar. trees. II. ANALY!'IS: A. Background: The original application for the subdivision of the subject property was submitted for review en October 12, 19U. The proposal included.a 34-lot subdivision 'on 6,-61 acres of land and was submitted as Tentative Tract 14125. ,The project was sent 'throu-ih Committee review in February, 1980. ? The applicant revised;\ the application based on staff 'f recommendations and incorFgrated, an adjacent pare}ol, resulting ; in the current project submittal. S. General: Tate applicant #s. roposing, to dei,41dp: 37 lots ranging `?n' size`from 5,480 square,;feet to 13,294 square-feet with an average lot size of,7,290 square feet. Three (!3) floor plans are proposed, each floor plan has'ahree '(3,) elevations, Floor Plan I has 2;,87*`;square feel, Floor Plan 2 t M79 square feet, and Floor" Plan 3 has -3.445 square r� C. Design Review Committee: On February 22, 1990,, theA,Comaittee McNeil, We and Coleman' reviewed the -.prLiect ,and recommended approval with the following conditions. Site Plan 1. Per 'technical Review Committee comments, the combined . length of Via,'; speranza and, 'V' Street shall be limited to a maximum of 600' feet.: h' 2. The Coast Live Oak tree on,Lot 35=should' be preserved.- 3. Revise the house plotting''+on.Lots 1, 2, and 3 to allot; for an increase in the landscape and' wall setback along-^ Lemon Avenue. The landscape and wall setback adjacent to Lots 4 and 5 mar"be decreased to maintain.,the- required, average 'and minimum standards. 4= ;Revise the grade difference ,bLween Lots 17 and 3$ to remove the retaining; :Gall along the side;property line, y 7a PLANNING COKMISSION .STAFF REPORT EA & TT14459 L.A.rCNANCO March 28, 199Q Page 3. Architecture 1. Prcvide. louvered vents, quretrefoils, etc.. on side elevations to break up-large expanses of stucco. Provide a corbel, either wood or stucco, below the building pop- outs On the rear elevations. Other 1; Cornet;' side yard and .return walls should have a stucco finish to match the finish of the units,, 2. The -Committee , recommr.,nded the applicant host a neighborhood meeting prior to the Planning' Commission I - meeting. D. Tree Removal Permit 88-63:IThe applicant has submitted a reouest for the remoy�ol of 62; trees in conjunction with the development of this tract. 3n addition, , approximately 20 fruit trees are proposE�d :for removal; however, fruit and%nut bearing trees are eempt from the ` Tree Preservation Ordinance. The arborist report identifies t,J ,(2) EucV ptus globulus (Blue Gum) windrows. Oi;e windrow runs nurtB/south and is located in the northwest portion of the project site; :he other, windrow runs east/west and is l the southern portion of the <project site '(see Exhfbi '01.` A third. windrow of Eucalyptus globulus w - ;aot ad�res8ed by the arhorist's- report as required street wideninc; along lemon Avenue will require their removal.- The arborist's report addresses four (44 other heritage trees located on the interior of the tract. These trees 'consist of one, (1) Coast Live Oak tree and three+ (3) Inceurse Cedar trees. Onz`(1) additional tree, a Canary Date-Palm'r.-was.'not addressed by the arborist report but is located 'on the ,project site, appears to be in good` hea'lth', and is recontnended for preservation. The Incense Cedar trees will need to he removed for th2 install ttion of drainage improvements, The arborist's report has been provided as..part' of the 'tree removal request and evalucted the trees regarding, their overall health on a tree-by-tree _bcsis' identifying the following; Presence of.Eucalyptus, 'nnghorn Borer Feetle.(Ehoracantha semipunctata). r' PLANNING COMI'SSiON STAFF REPORT EA & TT14459 - .L.A. CHANCO March 28, 3990, Page 4 2. generally poor, health, apparently because of the drought " conditions, Worne-nod by the,raise in grade. 3. Some trees ha'vp grown at.awkward angles that inc ease the potential for arge limb ,breakage.' In some circumstances, pear structure has _ resulted from 'r "" oppi;ng", which caused weakly attached spi'zuts to -Farm. '4. Mary.<trees ir*.,the. windrow running "north to south have - developed a' s.rMre lean to, the south 'because`of, strong Santa Ana winds: Due` to the present condition of the trees. «nd given the location of proposed improvements, .the: Cbvst Live Oak and `the' °Canary Date Oalm, are oecomme�ided by,staff and the arborist report for prssprvS`ion` (see .Exhibit "W). Based:on this informatirn, staff does not object to the removal of :the Eucalyptus' windrows as: well as the trees located on the irrterior of the ;project` site,-`except For the Coast Live Oak and the Canary Date Palm. The' trees shculdIbe .repl,aced with Eucalyptus macuieta (Spotted Gumy in the 1'ands-ape setback along Lemon Avenus, per. the size and spacing requirements` of E: the Tree Preservation Ordinance, Eucalyptus maculata trees art.. N0re not condi.t?onE:"far replacement along Archibald Avenue;,•ds 7 the trees' will be inconsistent "with ,iq. '.Ardscaoe dgga. n concept for tiro street. 1 E, Historic,Preservation CoF-rission: There is an existing" barn located on' she project site that is hot cn the City's list of designated or potential historic structures. Staff'g1aestionr!d the barn' historic significancy and. determined' that :tae Historic Preservation Commission sh,uld have:an opportunity to review the structure. Staff will ri-onmend that the Historic Preservation Commission evaluate the" yarn' ann determine °the r historic significance. The attachea'' Resolution of. Approval. i requires review ` by the Historic Preservation Commission (scheduled for April 5,:>1990). Mitigation measures'# if any," � Will be established at that meeting. III. ENVIRONMENTAL'-ASSESSMENT: . `Part I 'of the Initial Study his been s completed by the applicant, Staff has completed Part II Iof the Environmental Checklist and has found no significant ";impacts' on the environment as a result of this project. IV. FACTS FCR FINDINGS:_ Ir 'o ffer" to appro the projyerti the ,i following findings need to be mtde,by the ,%..rr.,JssiQ, n:. _a, project ,,- will be cons isten&-With th# Gererai',Plan and the `Development Code The project,'with" the added .m?ti'gation` measures will nat be Y, r' PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF*R FORT s EA.'& TT14459 -`L.A :gHANCO �l March ;28, 1990: Page 5 detrimenta'1 to the public. health"or safety, or "cause nuis:nce or significant environment31 ;impacts. ' In addition,;the proprsed use and. Site :,Plan to etfser with the racrmmended condtic+ns 9 apprndal are in complaance with the applicable pro��s ons"o.f.the ;• ,- Development Code' and,,City Standards„ a V. CORRESOONDENCE: This, item has-been.advertised.,as a pufil `c hearing in They, Daily: Report 'newSpaper; ,the. 'property ;gusted -with the supplemental notification �i,gn; and.natiCes sent-,to'all' property owners withi 300 feet of the project site. OM' END IN: Staff recommends the Planning- Commission approve - enta ive CraFt 14459 tki`rough ado on of the attached, Reso�vti'o.ns of Ap rov Res ectful mitt y 2 ;Brad Bu11e :�. • , City P1a er BB:TG/j s Attachments: E,chitir '"A" Site Utilization.Map Exnibit "B"' Tract'.Map''14459 -� Exhiw t IC-1 Gr4ding Plan ' Exhibi "D" Existing'Features Map f Exhibit "Eli. Building Elevations Exhibit 'rF" F1aAC.,°lans Resolution a Ap"prr'G;al for Tentative ?rac '.14459 with Standard Conditions Resolution of Approval f,,r rentati;ve Trait 14459 Design. Review wit. Standard _i�4itions , f � i J Ij IF 1—N r Y r" R.•4 tnj jai •► -._�_� �`y. ' 4'c .ys..Y FL� i1t _.�x�•s .ir tf afro �f � � .�F �. _ 1 r dw �IN+[ y� il fnu -j a Y 1 is I.rt jt W.. -0.1 ` .1� IRxI M cvlgtY�. lL+MT' nw'. m �� .u.tNL _ , . FIN , py xt AI 1�w.;•., cec:�- .n, h ti m of.. q w»-��� a+, cb•,:/ �.vi a. tl R..�� -� 4�gt:�M � i�✓"-J' :�s yaw `.,44 �..1 RBI 3f.i 4♦. �G'�. .tM[.I 1�.lrB RsiOY y Va 'a►�+�• Y. •"p rrEm T T OF F'.MCH0' ��CUC=.2MC3ItiIGA G P NIMO DMSIOPJ . Tri'L.E u °YI I✓ WIT JV� � • u I is 36 ® et ! 1• 2 i :): 4It Y I rM1U1M af11y = IIN1I I . ..,r Y• e � ',r i 1 � — — �:•°may t it �. d l ®C i011NCHO 'm.GdCAM. J1V W[°8 .yp. ,t L dH D.V A✓!N4G ..� ri— 1 of •� �.,.�y r r � I 1U1 x _,x+l Tr ab xf Z' 14 Or "ZOT -P. kc fi all -'; '� ,��•�Z �f. W' Lp i...:♦ .:aware( -�Y ,��r/M. x �7 :�► \ I� ',, 2• 1. 3." M )' r 2.4 I 1 a �'1�� ?1. '�9•�Ir—�Imo- Q•(� "� �L—• - - i W r� TTE1Vi ��r ,CITE': OF RANCHO CUCAMON � NING I�I�l'ISION I< <� T r X SCALE: '—" s -- t' ,Leif re `._�✓ s� 10 i...may ! .ecew /6 � A ! ay.l aF 10 At tr ,E vtij 'U.atJi�xJW IYIWVt"� •'�I gr�r�v'�.�' ' '1 �...a� /r � i yil ,� YN�I�� ,(Zmove& i EX1YE8'T: } y� - s, 14, t17 Y Ammm An .,oil r 0 r a _ �y �; ---• ? �l1t�- l.�l�1 ,�. r �i � � 4 "�'�Ilfll1111111111 5= �vr r `� Fief q I FYI', f� �.: .�. ' �'ten►.---. r P F 5 4 1., r! �✓��` �� {���it C�l O v�' � *c"1,1 e;; l C�e-l. ���.. • �Kam. ,f' t iii h1�El ' a p� !�'��4� ■ter.� �j?�yfay �Y tia. *( k" N{14llll �"F •- ," taoAtit Iff IL •ram � t 1'� `-�':�`y 1.+ir+.ri+' �—cr-��!r-_ ��...ti y,� r.. 7 � -•---- • ,{«{tile '�ulilfifl�iltn� ,1 r �.,� ��,:!'�� aka l y��LI k.- :. 1 '„ �„J.•,., `,l. c-Ti Y r �♦Z.t�. 1�' iJ�■ p �1�� J ` h� .c',F^'t k ,r> a $1 I I7 h �• �'#S. t.. �+rK !} .:_ now=1 ML II► Bill �fl�111�I�IIIIIIIN(N��!!' "'�{INS '; u■ t ` ;r',III#1# H##I#ilb�t#I#11#llu31lillHl �. Nib ■� , . — 4ttt, �r III I!.r W1}}}�}tJ}��}����}����II��t��I�ILI�;�I�l ,e cif. �rl �o monger �- y A7;4a1 77, i�11� {�Iu41U r o�,YF 1 r q ,�� •:'itatr 1 1'•/'>: r l�!' �O'•`-1 illy ,.axe'a' 1. J Uqatr gild iU111(IIt tf 3 ► -.as+ t�,�t t xa�.;i i r• 1 fj t� °►r�1( 4� 1 �" --dig Y' �, tom:r 1 Ga• �tf�_�� ��_ 1 \'� �� j ♦r� 4. l ►►►►:ems►� _ � �ti , Ofr � - _ .r.. •— r; r 1ifFFF`i�_J��i tIF \e w. T 4 Fv O l 4 .b Rrarui. rYrarii■ A;�I /4 rw.lii � iSaaa® �■ Ir ii, 7� a c! allnii� aArril W_ am fm'�.. 1 r ` t cv U Al carol pp •u�r d r� •t ix�• t ,.l ���-- �Q.��C� nda t .. �, �. o .:_.� ���� . � n � � � � : �� t ai n o / s � - s. mom I Id. CiJ i 1 TJ■ \■f■r■■rO■f.��y� I � 4 _ r. rR■ r I "y'1u/■�r■:q� l •. sue.• �. ICQ RESOLUTION,NO: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; CALIFOtNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE'TRACT MAP' No. 14459 AND RELAX TREE A REMOVAL PERMIT 8-b3, RESIDENTIAL SnBDI VISION�OF 37 �SIN�3LE ;FAMILY :�OT8 ON , A ACRES OF" .LANb LOCATED 'AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF,, ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND LEMON. AVENUE IN THE LOW f'EviT!;P RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4043 DWE'LLING`,,UNITS PER` ACRE), AND MAKING, FINDINGS"'">N SUPPORT THEREOF,- APN: 201-251-3 4, 40 AND 41 A. Recitals. (1) L.A. Chancy has filed an. application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 14459 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,-the subject Tentative Tract Map request is r0erred to as "the application.° On the 28th of March, 1990, the Planning f;,,imission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga cond: ted a 'duly niticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All 'legal prerequisites to the `adoption of this Resolution iave occurred. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is herby found, determined and ''resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancba Cucamonga as 'follows': 1. This .Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resaluti1h are true' and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence 'presented! to this .Commission during .the above-referenced public hearing on March 28, 19g0, including written and ;oral staff reports, together , with �oublic testimony,, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:' (a) The application applies to proerty located' at, the southeast corner of Archibald Avenue and. Lemon Avenue, with a lot depth of 783 feet as measured from Lemon Avenue, and lot depth of 5Gt feet as measured from Archibald Avenue; and, (b) The: project site contains one (1) bara `Iodated in the north west portion of the tract; and, (c) The property to the north, west and South of the subject site contains single family ,homes an'-,the property to the iiast;is':vacant; and, (i!) ..The subd'tvTsii�n contemplates' the ldevelopment ilf;37 lots averaging 7,290 square feet in siz.a: 4 4141 i J ` PLANiiING COMMISSION; RESOLUTION No. •- Y1 TT44459 It TREE:.REMOVAL. PERMIT.88-53 - L.A, CHANCQ Mach:2$, I9g0 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial 'evidence presented to this Commis ion during the. above referenced public hearing and;upon. the specific findings of facts set forth 1n:`paragraphs 1.zina_,,2 above, this. Commission;hereby finds and concludes as 'follows. (a) That tentative. tract is consistent with the,..; Genera 'o1an-:Development Code, and specific piarts; and; r, ` (b) The design or improvements `of the tentative• tract is., consistent`with the. General Pia.n, .Develupment Coder;and specific plans; and (c) The site physically suitable for the,,ty pe of development proposed; and (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial L.environmental damage and, avoidable injury to humans and wildlife 4r their habitat; and (e) The tentative: tract"'is not, likely to •cause serious uublic' heath problems;..and::- _ (f) The. design -of the tentat, y{ tract �yi1lF:tiot conflict with any easement acguired;by the:publ"U at large, now of record, for access through or, use ,of the p ' proposed subdivision, rope��ty within he 4. This Commission hereby finds aid,certifies that the project has', been reviewed and considered in compliance, with a he'CaTifoat. Environmental Quality Act of 1570 and, further, this Commission heretsy issues a 't;e Negative g eve 5, Based, upon the`findings and conclusions .set forth in paragraphs . 1, 2y 3, and 4 'above, this Commission hereby approves the a to each and every condition set faith lielaw and in the attached Standard Conditions, attached,hereto and incorporated herein.by this reference. ' ..i Piannin® Division O Pria3r to the recordati:bn of the final map or the issuance of building permits, :wh`ichever comes first, the applicant 'shall -consent to, or participate 'in; the. establis►iment of'.a Me1To-R6os -ComR unity Facilities ' District pertaining to-the projec,t,site 'to provide, in cUnjunction with, ',the , ,applicablc+�f; School { District, for the constructio►i and mafntendnce of `necess3rY school facilities. "i:oyever, if 1' any:School'Distr;ct has;previously:establishedi - e if 1l �: PLANNING COPfhtISSION RES("MTION "NO; TT 144594 TREE!UEMOVAL-"PERMIT '8843 - L.A. CkAtito, March,28, 1940 Page 3, such ,� �Coiuntity facilities District, '��the, , ` .ryappli/,int shall., in the alternati:ve,'consent to the annexation of the project site into'the territory ofsuch existing District prior tG,; the recordation of the final map or, the issuance of rb6l ding ;permits, whiCiever comes first. Further, 'if the- affected School District:has not foni�ed a, �1e11o=Roos Community'.Fac,ilities 0istrii't` within tweide (12:),months of the :date of ippr"al of the .project 'and prior to',-the r final map,.or. issuance 'of " building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed nuU and-void. .; (2) The :barn located `:;n the < project site" is scheduled for, review by", ."the° `"Nistori�w Prw*vation. Cammission on :Rsril a, 1990 to. eva ldate`,4 the barn's "historic. si.gm Tic anLe;> Mitigation measures, if any,,?Rwil;l >ae established at that 'meeting. Prior to'"the recordat�:n,of the"fi'nal map and th,A issuance" rr=b!ailding permits,'I.a,"l wntigatio4f neasures .established by the HistoriL Praservation Commi ssi un will. need,,to ,be campl;elVed to the satisfaction "nf the City Planner, If: the Historic„Preservation. Commission ` determines the barn 'to. be; historicali;�r sianificant and said ;determination `, causes change to the . tentative, map„ the applicant sY�all, pebres`s an " amendment-to the map prior to the recordation p of the, final trect mz,p r. (3) Revise>-,the grade difference""between, Lots�sl7 -and 18 'to remove the re-ainin'� wall :along the 'side property line. The finish elevation of. the two lots' shall be similar, as "driveway , hammerhead'-4urn-around areas _,re located 'in a manner `that may cause conflicts if a grade" difference exists. (4) The.�aast Live:.0ak (Quercus';agrifolia) located: on L'���: `35 shall be preserved-in-place. (5) The, Canary Date "Oalm (Phoenix canariensis) located, on Lot 6 shall either be`preserved ihj place or, relocated wi--thin the project site. 0 sa 5 PLANNING,.COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, ` TT 144,59 & TREE REMGVAL. PERMIT 88-63 - L,A..CHANrO March 28, 1990 Page 3 such a Community. Facilities Di ict, the ' applicant shall, in 'the alterna e, col sent . to the::annexation of.;the project ite •i to"the territory of such existing_,Di rict. p for to the 'recordation of the ' fi map or n the issuance of buil ding>permit Whichever comes first. Further, if the affecte School District has ;not formed .a.`Melloso ' :Commu ,` Fad i;ties Di strict-within twely 12) `,mo the'of the :date of approval of. the rojec nd;prior` to`'whe: cordation of the ,-inil 'map •or., ssuance of b ildin'g" permits .gor s id project, this �o ition shall deemeull 'and voitl. (2) a am loc ed ' onthe project site is `s edu ed, 'f Irnr-'view by prithe' Historic eva erte¢itn Lar 'fso h'istor ec s gnificanceo 'Miti io measpres, if any, vrill be estab, h at fifiihatr meeting P :.�r to the issuanc ofb�rtilding permits al l`:..mitigation ,.! measur'e established by `:the Historic. Preser t1 '°hppmmission will need to be. compl ,ed th satisfaction of ,the City loan r. (3) Re se 'h a gra d fferenc'eebetween Lots IT-, a TB�to remove he' a,aining,wall along the de operty lin a finish elevation of e wo lots .sha1 be similar, as' driveway am94head turn-aroun areas are located in. a 'ma her that;:may cans c nflicts 'if a grade d' Terence exists. ( he Coast,Live Oak, (Quercus 'rifolia) 1,ocated on'Lot 35 shall,'be preserved place. 5' The .Canary. Date Palm (Phoen1 canariensi!, located on Lot 6 shall either be, reserved-in= " place or relocated within the.proj t site. (6) Both the Coast Live Oak`,and the Ca``ry,Date -;Palm are desi,gaated "Heritage Trees' by the,, Tree. -Preservation ` Ordinance., As such; sped ific care shall. be taken durig,a1J ases of construction to ensure that . tio d age``' occurs to the trees, All .construction's tl : I si _�y , PLANNING COMHI55%ON RESQL!lfIQN NQ: ' TT 14459�& TREE;REKVAL Pi h'#1T GG-S3 . L A CHANCtT March x6 199007, Page 4 A } preservo and protect_the' health of the trees, .: tz to remain "An'��,accordance` 'with the, following' measure`s (a), Al:l ;,tees to be "'saved;shall 6� ericlos by an appropria`te�,construct_ioli barri , tr such as.cita,in link .fence or.other mgns �= dcceptab•ld: to th6 Uty;Planner, prior to { the issuance`of- any, grading.or budding permit; and ,prior to-- cormencem t of { work Fences' ,are ,tb: remain i iSJace 1 duting=alt phases of canstructia an may, r, not be,, temoaea riithout, th wr ;tteti 4 consent Hofttie City . Plain er 'until- constrtlCtiOn i5 01, do i �(b) No,t substantial isruption7 removal of°', the sttuctatral or:absorpt�e;r.oots of.' an;;' tree shal°l be perfc�rised' and,.' {c} No flit,mdteriasha1 be pi aced,wi. hin ,� feet from tW:; outer trunk, 'ci:rcumference. of any tree, and (d) Na: fi�l ;materia shall be placed within { the d;'ip'iine of any free iii excess of 38 inchesi�% dep ,, Thisr, s a,giidel,ine and-, -� is` smWect to �+sadlf9edtiQg to meet the ! needs`, ,of indiidual tree' .,species as deterati'n'edI.by- in' amorist ar landscape. 5, archite �. an dL'= =1 (e} No s ZS'ta-ntra:i compaction��of the soil wItOfn the drip,�line ot:any`� ree shjii be u.er.taken; and",' j (f) ro construction, incluoi.ng structures find wails. that d3srupts' the. ro t system shalt be permitted. . As, a gui ling, no cutting of roots should occurithin a distance equal. to 3 IZ2 times t►je trunk diameter,• as, measured at ground"5�ievei.. Actual setback may vary to meet the needs. of individual tree species as.dete, ined, by an. arborist or landscape arcii,,ect. Vdtsere Some root;removal ,is necessary, the tree -cµown may require thinning •to prevent:vitfid damage. a. PLANKM COMMISSION.RESOLUTION NO TT '14454 & TREE. REMOVAL pERMI7 88-63 - L.A.. CNANCO March;M 1990 Page'5' {7)"" Tree' "Removal `Permit No. 88 61 is. approved ' subject`.0 the replacement:requirements of"the Tree. Preservation "ordinance: Replacement trees, Spotted Gum Eucalyptus (Eucalyptus maculata) "mi.nimum' '15-gallon .size, spaced 8 feet on center shall be' planted in, the � r. landscape setback along'Lemon Avenue: and shall be shown on the.Land"scape•Plan subject-to City Planner's' review and approval" prier. to; the' Is of budding permits. "" (8) The wail design along"Lemon 'Avenue shall be designed compatiblemo with e'xisting.wall's'van':the, north side of`Len Avenue ;and proposed.walls •-_ to the east. the design of the. wall "sha11 .be " subject to City Planner' eview and approval ;prior to .)s'suance of building permits., Material 'sampleg shall be submitted ,prior ao' the issuahce of building permits: (g) The wall design,along Arctilbald AAvepud shall be designed compatible Whh.:the existing ;wall located on the ,past side of Ar6',7bald.,Avenue south of the project;site. <Trie design o•f. the wall shall ".be ubjeat to City-Planner's review and appravaI prior to: the issuance of building: permits: Material samples shall" be submitted prior to. the issuance of building permits. (10� A1T " wa`Tis sfialT be .eonstructed: .of . soi, masonry and shall be provided, with a' decorative eap: Cambinaton . retaining and freestanding ` wills located adjacent' to existing walls ':,hall 'be provided witri a cap to prevent'- debris, etc., from being �pl.aced between`"the walls. (11) Side yard return"wales shalli be constructed of> solid masonry and shall be designed'*'With a finish .. consistent with the house design. subject to City PT'anner`"s review and approval prior to the 'issuance of building perrai"ts PLANNING COMNISSION;RESOLUTION TT 14459 & TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 8843 - L.A. :CHANCO March 28, 1990 Page 6 En�ainecrina Division ;, � .; (1) Overhead Uti1i ies ^I (a) Archibald. Avenue - The existing overhead," utilities (telecommunication and electrical) on; the :projec;t' side of Archibald .Avenue. shall be undergrounded ' from_ the' first ;pole north .of the north' project;boundary to. the, first pole ;south of the south project boundary (incSuding the out- 'parcel), pw+or _ to public `improvement nceptance "or occupancy,, whichever occurs first: The developer. may request -a reimbui cement agreement: i o recover one-half the'!City adopted 'cost for undergrounding; ` ,from" _ future development. (redevelopment) as it occurs, on: the oppositeside of the street. s C (b) ' Lemon Avenue An in-lieu fee as, contribution to;the future undergroun ing of the existing overhead' utilities'" (electrical and�tel,econication) onthQ opposite side;or- Lemon, Avenue' shall be paid•to tre City prior to.the'approval of the Final Map. ;The fee shall'be'one-half . the City..adopted unit amount `times the length from 'the _center of .London Avenue to the west tract boundary. (2) The landscape. design for' Archibald Avenue shall .be in conformance with the, approved Landscape Master Plan for Ar.,�`ua1'd Avenue. (3) London Avenue shall be constructed fulT7Width including street lights"on the east side;from Lemon Av4nue.`-to Via Esperanza. The street :trees and sidewalks on the:east side shall be deferred unti development 'of. the• adjacent pro�:2rty. The developer , may request an agreement, to recover the cost of, the in,,: svements east of "the centerline upon development of, the property to the east. (4) Provide �-art easement and ,construct a -story drain pipe from "B" Street southerly- and western through Lot 27 to Archibald Avenue and ; r extend southerly, within Archibald Avenue to PLANNIN6"COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 1445,9 &,TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 88-63 - L.A. CNANCO March 28, 1990 Page'? join the existing storm drain pipe' at Highland Avenue,. The,design,of the storm drain pipe in Archibald 'Avenue shall be coordinated with ,the, City'S. M ghland'Avenge stHrin drain" project, (5) The improvements of Leman Avenue shall be coordinated with "the' City's project:' to, construct the; .Master Planned Storii Line in Leman, Avenue, The -developer' shai.l .;be responsible ,for the constructiop of the.Master Planr4d Storm Drain dine in; Cemon.,Avenue.,from -Archibald.. Avenue to. the tower`;' Arta' Loma ' Ghanriel. if improvements for the, Uract; are .. constructed prior to the'OMPIetaon of the projeci,.by the' City. Standard.drai'noge.;fees world then be credited- to the cost for the.` facility and-the developer,.:shall ihe�ali'gible for reimbdFsement ,of cost in` excess Of" the fees in accordance with City-Ordinance,No< 75. (6) Construct. full curb-to=curb width street improvements: nciuding street lights.fro the , project site 'easterl'y and :norther_1y'fo lemon Avenue through Tentative'- Tract 1,4011., to ,provide',for secondary access'to. the.aiojec if not previously constructed- by Tract . 14711. The developer` 'mzy 'i,ggest, ;;# reimburserment agreemert to recover'. e cost upon development. of Tentative Tract 14`0I1: '. (7) Landscaping shall- be provided -along., the fontage' of the "out.pdreel located between Lots 'b and: 22 - on Ar6hibal,d Avenue. . : hfainteniance.of, the 'landscaping_ shall be the , responsibility of the `property owner. (8) The sidewalk' on Lemon, ;venue shall be transitioned .from the property ;line to be located curb adjacent along the ,;frontage "of Lots 1,' 2, and 3 to.provide a minimc!m width-of 6 feet between the exterior, rac.�t,'iall;and the-, sidewalk for the panting of. street trees. 6. The Secretary to this Commission. sha11`certify' to the adoption, of this Resolution. ,'.'. +4 'f Li 'C. PLRNNING COMMTSSYgk'RE50L[7 TON.NO ;+ TT 14459 8 TREE, REhOVAL_;PERMIT 88-5 - A, CyANCO " March 2S, 19-90 Page 8 _ �s l t APPROVED,AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OE MARCH, 1990 ' t PiRNNING COMMISSION:OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Lamy T, .MCNfel; Chairman ATTEST: Brad Bu;Ter, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commissibn of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do 'hereby, Certify that the foregoingx';Resolution was:duT° and regularly introdq d;'pa"sse'd„ and adopted by the Planning ,Corcasiss 'on. of.the, City c Rancho Cucamonga, at a regulari meeting'of thei'lanning Commission held on tf e 28th day..of March,'1990' ujr the fallowing vqte-to-wits' AYES: COMMISSIONERS NOES:, COMMISSIONERS: rr ; ( ABSENT,: COMMISSIONERS;: ( ` it 1� y ra , s� S 22 o0 by gig �W3.8� g$$o3cu •!�"� a 141d j Z. cYL'CC$$S Wa yYp4jMpYC .Q i•G�� YV _� Q$ Q '.VOY..,YC �O q$Cp. i4�� 00 q Y l VSS Y Y� a;.p1 �( q Y�YN Y�6 Cd.. �n`YpyY �.Npyg� Gw.��Y N •G �e N~q :. gtl�C�(^/^� o± S4 �Ep�M 91y0 ®N` '.Mtlp ¢ � B_`Ygy6A,0�§�~.. B�.:yi�e y+aa •�.���` ».,.� � e.. �g�k. al 5oq, C w�cc 0 �aYptp .Yy� sg V 0 N S'.y A y »M�6 O,"L V O Y O)Y MCI, Y t�- e �`wLOa�9yy9 �Mv�O - �-CyIs M . ^ OYt A c gsP".o S s r yy }} g 5M.0 Y tlap0 ca Y N Vs y II r $ Vlg ^ eg ,»fie as All _ YIL a m TO q d aid I I I :✓V Y:LV O &d� v:wa o i � s mLym .Zr o� uuqG.� o �' NV tlS -®YB Oyr QyY�D �yO S S >` y `y`y rAgCq pV.-"y� `�N J. g`g -Yg«ScD� ar� Ot -31 e+8 8 1@ . sr6s �'q V�I.C1O�. �L� .. yL .Y��A �Ad�:��VO�- >-62 C, GC p y..' M Y Sr Y L O y gC g - p gY` by yO g y �s+rY Is � Irs �VV�y YMy N6.$G� YVY Viilt y Vl ± a9e�6A `i" S i.A a`.:llV YZII ®29 AVyft Z`M: H 11 g =$ ` S � V H Y�OV =ggy6p. yMN� ` qy b �`■M Spy y ` = S^M NilS sect ffi�V'r. Y V y a .e A garal ^ir1 2 As p Le2 Jul �qq�gg Lp� �$� a 8 p� ^ �' �� ® ��a S. N Y C. .^ � s C S. $ iaze ^ p z s I® M� a ID 3 —I 1 y ^7t 1� affi �wg g$g t `ss .Y.�,'n:rwo $c Old - Lb g,a88'Si$4�'v{�a� YCa� �tr7 �voq =y w[y ys^Y,.e8 �— No O Y� � 'aYCw�4IL ■ �hy 9 Y2. tz - � 8Y2M3 vry Q q y $$ Wit, -sY a�.e. L ab im.•$= io M a w5~ o.o.. a-.� }d' "bc" •'a..Y.caCS$ a Ui wg$.. �.^�yPjN OII`.� Y�C Mc.. NCO LY •.����NiiiLYYYfff.L a—�.$. «t2��'-Y aL�yu 4A Qhyp C .M'w YC fCCNii ,C �4�®, `VCOOO�N,C M Ise aN e M Ss VV `o p L n aye �3 Yo i'.lt DO "y_L r� •L`yym {fay0 IY• CLyys A«;..CyNi�_Y ..ti~ZNUt• GgL�.�L�`MVNgYa ' NY1Y6w . b�apOs'$• 4 Rg ae�Y � � $ tMr t �'MY�N .. .. If ..so. N qOw C® Ago' gir �ompG� 4� wa Yv3 NOSGs Nry M ai 5o2.$ N C`" —sl kL gY Y L + Y O� �0 0 M l� ✓ 0<6 M3@3 M= 1 14 i� Lt V p s Os MYb 8�M= a q=i y - is�� w� � �` .sop- w;• .. i. a li �€ g w4 • .�[+ ggp te S ' •�� S$MS � Y r V Y a gful s L ��'9 � E, age. yeIS `�[q yi Y FMB Hp sySip +^Y' IYy•'' —� S S +�.5 `E9^ a 6 a a� w s rL' fi i off« IR L � II t a- r cu i� o 133 o CSTL ,SUA 44 .O /�. C N A N •1 • :. a � . uu Y pYv Vv 99 Y k¢yyss 221 a �yO� ..MM�. V M M�y ° �cDC Y.D� aYq�y(V 61S JYS 9p Y.OY .{Y@I �Pigs vo M� � V N N M 9 �eAy�M.- �aLi..�� �6uya :G if a 72 2y�NGY l44 rbbO G` VY Iy =Si Y 3 �N�= V- aag L. a a Q4 ` a °feVgl 3 M • iq+{ �. V Csi :. it ° .. t -a- PaT Ell I2. or Ilk a ill's a ��. M» .j, --Z ilta• is Is =.I I�-- Sat �wyy� � "��� an s�ga o � _ ,pL� m r� �'jj .gyp• � � y «��'�.,. }'... �..33 U {^��p$.a.H N L C • L C 831 o S A^ * �• O =�1 � _w� �V{� L a Q Y 9 w p V� ci d.M� oN.�v�.yy5 ��CC e- Cg� o aa�ei vy a4 u� . L>.� N L Y�9 d w O Q� �s w S � C 9�•. �� p 61 Awl O f 9 L w - p�•�N ^ULO�u M�... w p�pd�� maw Y Y: Y Y VY O. L $Op j� ��j Q q yh u "• KV n 6 ea hl C Dy$Cbp G`1.`^'V,G'p M$p�p 6 C4^ F^ s�:�qy o �• $ Q �d � w wpN`,p y�� 9 pq1..q tl Iy.O.�M y yVs q N 96 N.l. p L yyy�wy{C(�. 1yC, a ep lr^1 g.pOO{Apq M��VY^®®L U 9�C1`0 O ,A�` {� .. S~ `�YY `• C �I➢ ^��Ca G(�� y OAOY Ay�yaY O� 6C. iiM �� « . Y.� V QOV VOOIO. 8 V,12w O® ¢� OA ¢ $�C 0. G�w� 09 W •• QO C� 4E� OS�� Eli ps S'SO y } w Sol as XT B. L —12 WN W Y m 0:9 "6S+ > Y @M F+ ® m V (`\ • ��O 9 Y�1. y,LL 4 i� 6 ��A A� � � y a. 4 V� S 4 g g L b Y p kiEQ� �L'L N�rp® _S gVVCEnn� a�YB�g .you R �s `�J 3oa L'd SO C,Q.� 4�._ tl�O q N A. ��a a� N � L O � •O�, is i wi allo �6 �.p, .ems+ ed$u -,^* :n, ryuy g3 �=� ' ...� CHNC iY. ppw a 4 Y N p S- y Zoe Bit. �• g S G Q : YG!�� L �p{i `'� i G pa ami L y 4.0 Q _av a • Na4 �8 S�DC�Co �� �of�y.� �{q{. ig�w _IY O_y Q A C q ■�` L ®�u g L 1' tl =g F. 0a. wa 0 �a C® A V 4C Y,;ua w +6 Y� i„1 rMMv V AAa pppm� `�..W '.� aa ^®® OOp �:®.�" •N 9 �M� Y«�WM YCNI L Ll N.WW qa�n q C G `•C L Os a' Nti 4Su L icy ptl 4 A YJU Ma�^ga�py y� gy�� p4�`q` �� W g 4 s -.9 QC q uiOS .^. V)V. ��S :c Lt �S Y1�M G/✓ Sii 4oiV <4 ;,�`q 0 ,h Gu® C) 01 14 I v� e8 M m C M W Evs 4. wI frig N bugggV ® tlYN y e� a® y � NZ U1 7pptl� L^ ^a� �aJ 0tl ®per •� �+ �� ffi 1 w pp gggg ggSit v 112 Q dggQ�` 44 y 4 r OY _„ff bba ��k pw aJe y M a. Oil yvy am oL ^+ — L� a Y - F } .. 73, L V 2 01 O N ( 02 Zia.: r M s YOB ML o a r _.Yvan ea Y 4 �I ow. '16r � �oa e CCam. esy � ,.` $` Ell SIX mock r�, Bj 1 33 .®. o Q —kil c y'L �g � ®� o� $.a s'F 11% 1-8 Ic. ao-a ace 319. V s $ 4 dd a �1 4 f—3 K _ ryw y � �.. Ou CIS. .1 1 '- `�' tt z ;1. L RESOLUTION 10, J A RESOLUTION OF VIE PLANNING COMMISSION C)F THE .CITY'OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA;-.CALIFORNIA, .APPROV.ING DESIGN REVI84 FOR TENTATIVE :T.RACT HO" 14459;' V RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONw OF 37,SINGLE ,FAMILY L'OTS.ON.8I.ACRES OF LAND"LOCATED Ar THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ;ARCHIBiLD AVENUE AND LEMON hVENUE IN THE.LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (44 DWELLINe 'ONITS PER 'ACRE) AND .MAKING.L FINDINGS IN. SUPPORT THEREOF - APH: 201451-3 a.':4� 4D AtID 41 ' A. Recitals; (i) L,A% Chanco has, filed art applzcatyon for,ithe Design-Review of, Tract. No. 14459 as described,:in the title of this Resolution. .46`einafter, ;.. the subject Desigr� Review,rtq'uest is referred .to` as "the'appl cation 11 (ii) On 'March 28, 1990, :the'Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamaoga held a meeting,to consider the,applicat_iona- f i; ) Al lss 'legal prerequisi tes to the yadoption -of this Resolution `s hav nccurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEPEFORE i i r't s here f� nd t i b ou de r ned a r l 'b, _ , y _- ,: _ e m nd eso �1ed y the Planning Commission of the'City or Rancho, Cucamonga as.;follows:' 1. This, Commission hereby specifically-finds.-that gall of ;the facts .set forth in the f�ecital,s, Part A,,i�f this Resolution are..true,and eorrect.' 2. Based upon substantial 'evidence ;presentedtothis, Commisso= during the above-referenced meeting on March 28, 1990 .includin iwritten and oral staff reports,. this Commission hereby'specifica.11y finds-as 'Sol lows: (1). That the proposed project is, consstent `'witl the objectives,tof the' General Plan;'and - (2) That the proposed design is`in accord With the, � objective` of tithe .Development Code and, the- purposes, of the_'district ' 'which the.site is located; and (3) That the; proposed design is in ccmpliancel With each of the ';applicable provisions of; --the Development Code; and c y 4' LANNING COMM ISSION.RESOLUTION NO ,FOR TT 144$9 L.A CHANCO t March"28; 1490 t„ Page-,2- 5 (41 Thai the proposed design, .to9ether With the conditions appliLabie' thereto, wi11 °not be`, ' detrimental to the -public ,healthsafetyt- or R vpelfare, or materially injurious to ordperties or impr"o'vements in the Vicinity,.., 3 Based ;upon the findings and conclusions set. forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above,, this Commis`sion.,hereby..approves" the appi.ication'subjecl to ,each (i`t and .every i,on'dition in the: attached St ndard Co'itditiot�s, attached hereto"and I corporat_it herein by this reference.' 4. The s Secretary to thi Cominissioa shaf certify ate the adoption r of tfiWResolution. > " APPROVE6:AND MOTEO THIS;.28T}i DAY OE MARCH, 1990. PLD.,NNING COMM ISSION�OF TH.E,CITY W RANCHO CUCAMOk6Awb BY: Larry 't. McNiel", Chairman; ATTEST: Brad'Buller .Secre:tary. . Z` I, Brad Buller,` Secretary of the Planning Coaraission"of the City of:."Rancho ~r Cucamonga, do hereby- certi+y,.ffhat the foregoing Resolution was ;duly "and regularly introduced- passed, and adopted"b the Planning Cbmmissi,on ..o the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the P1ar�ning Commission held on the 28th day of March, :1990,,by the..fo iawing`vaie-to wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: `NOES: COMMISSiONERs:, ABSENT:; CQIAMISSIONERS ' S 1 i r x Z 1 r: $ -. Eia ral IL .1Z "III eN Iji Jz ti p s —» _ m og`�Y§fie Y�^gg a°g1§ °r8«g- ebTZ' �fx ya$�••.�a��'". or�.:'{e�y $� �Qu� a�� i'd— /$Xc1�«$,...: It a it 51 �«rf UY L:a�O1 V.eq i, pppp L i1�._c..- ��ge oa[.&3o Qua so; i Y Y $ 34� �.o; S 3 ® s �'.i� L1 3 I e UbM Lw�Yr_.� g ; log .04 JV ^ ffi " a Y gg ziAI IRri S O N a�- r a i N 4 tg� j3Ya T-v au'U0 L:VmUz Ctl GyN C� 9�Ytl V V. AN is 5v Hsi 0, OEM z Lill J y��iF oHt +q.o v y7.IT Ma Is �` 8 N.F.a.iC S ^ode 0-0 u .�w in. g.e�y!� �+Y x� „.' �`bN'.yy_k � d �. �_N o� .. T IA �t 4..Q'�CM 'tl'(tl� adoa ap � 2 .��^w �C �•..p\� s..T NgOgC b66q ._Oro lalq q� Y gNgp� � N �C�•tu��yi �q • :yL Y3Z NCr tl p�d{ d�c5 � 3EN �&s «NtlaQ $ �� � R M N p SS y Y N N Y a dWO Q ^g ®G a W 4 w �Og N��j¢grj.gIYJw f...N--a Y•Pl :ON,.Y- p.a_V.1 ON. A P tlri Mw�N•' s�V !p �S� Lg 9 mQ awa"pe�p [°=U E44a� _ggC G I pY pyL Jwy(� rr+1Ni �i cc V QY _g pgYp Nc tle 6gr py _b C .El 6 �w.VV �Vi Li,M ri ii Rd -O KM N:N V�i � ,.W �H tl Kf A h OY IT Ix-.: N�a.ayl .Y Y•.. •LY¢, _tl(/2a «ggu Sri .gam O Ytl St e �p ga d Q Aq ax Y wfi 40 «fix „.Eyy$ w •-`� wg «${sad yoyd Y @ 0 ro $�q - ifs �a _s ps?g�- = 33 sit Jim. � afig «0.6,p tla M� '9a /„ • b'}�.7a V.a _Y r. �N�. Mjtl�d0 � ' �@� G i L.O(v490 9iC qO � - OR -...t+J Of�`O ilar.fiY Lai . �a=s 39.1_p�Yp O1 •Lp `+CZ QQ �• N pL..0 ss; a 8G{C{,� qr�pap Y ipC�� yy y YNY^ `�ygjmm..=tl ywY CC 4.@ p ..may O �apV e p gg tt pp 'y G C O16�•e §N G 4 Q GQ ,�. L:�YpN N �• Y `� �dvQOU 4q. O� yyGG �yia O Yy W Y. gN.yG ?Y VQ 7 S••i IJJ 'O.rSS N Y qC � Y Pr �� qYN \ �� O u,i�r�_CNC tJgtl�.ia C `�y NY aV eY� 89 p1 V`YNy Y� pOMNY'. NYy� uyC��C N wr�0 T�`�L iL� Yy� WCwD• .r �A OOXr� ep�y]►•+r... AMAi��:�` Ye� N Cy.p`M �aP f01•.L. I VQO r NO V `�1 g N YV N�3 r�.5 .5 �Y Q41 y !: I Y. fig N u� `pg $N v� y�gtl�Y�NyL'rogC�+ ®�� cc S. a Y h o� �eaNia• •+.�C` ara ` .. Yra �t L• g u G V LYiI U�.tl q Y C NOpLp t�/... GOtl Y �.24, N.p Epb bLpp Y.'Cgp�. �a� " �Ctl CpA�6Sp; L C Y C Y W`M r.•r S 4 L L rr0 a O G Y N 6Y O V i O ` p O. 6 LYa r.•Cgq UBq4�� y�/yy CYY pp6C Nr Na N. Q:NwaCN -ENO. .FLANS. 6N Vwr OI'i•U�CI IyO.' 44N.Vb. .�Y- ILOO�w 1 M YSP ..eqg S� a ` �gaL` sz ®nt ' :MLva� Off = L 11 = s ` C+ ® ii `p p pppt Y E. sm tlU12 it , lit fin l 4� $t 4Y`� CQ4Y WY W KV iidbb e L, -37 z � o L y� - �3CC ^�.6 ;w nGG.�,.. m�•AiQ® tl�e^� i M«�Ns" VtlL.6S ' Jpiyap{ 6 GM Ytl OLHC..Y6 L�p � Yw.. � p ;Y is{Wyp�y�. 'e Nam 46�0 NYL '. �, N {I p s q i^ew.`n 3ta. » Ntl�1 u�.., CL3 .i i�aC eLL " }yy} : l6tlt Mp S an ft asQ tl .1y dGa la Lp € �� tl. of 2>V fit N � Spy N � alp � e as � fit : r � ►� Y e 1323i �a«a. v Y 1L Ib- 'MWW � V fa i V��• =Y 4 y ` Y � N`q� _tCd SC �GGi UOywy `SC qqy. .• V $y9 YY4 YM�QWL :NCO` V� 7 p 4�. fTM 0.65 �tl,�N�S -.9��yt CY S} yQ S Ar�AS yG-1 L OS y Y'V .3 rt{4Op 6YL :�Y (`(11Z. 6OyU OSCC . tom. v O G �G V UN ip a _Y C i•C N O. $� �gA I"I 5 _ Sao E ._V q v a A C C C OY Y c v d ` V M Cc V C S��' g UN t V Ya 6g8.Y =a . qVV N'~.(�■(■J�CCL Y�L. Y 01 Olm A :. C i +`L yI`} L ' C�33.�a� ••�.06•'.�� d O�JJ�_� �_�I1�� ,.pY� �M .CY.mN. i �''q`a�8 uy � YID Si O 6 � i II spyy p Qp �jq p « ` CcCOLO iV... co CI� 'ems_ ,^ sIa tlup`;f L.Q�. ®H c An paqq�L•'E g� & 'a xv, re i a" R • rya • ll -it sill Wd t 7 ��58333 Y ® �� tr.•Yd Mt.4ja tie - O a mod.. ® ,— �® p Lb — w ill.b, il —Ta,�' — — B —_ 1a• s ^.fffr a e 3� 58' M -9 dy� ff(SSS +9 A— O ap ME N Nf N P{ O N 1m z-3 t w Y{� as6 g s� a all Y +yyf N a. `L Ys Sw $mom 23C$ � L a - la AL ,33 yyE L� .fie $ -�$S N • v a 5- s°• y OI�i$CCC6 ` -644 � �4w. vNS r4 r m — Qm ZZ e L Pr s�v v yY - O yC 6 _ yEyy 6 , o2:2 a. �•LY.. � 'N°'` o...-0 . $e N,4 , j,N ' NVray+ a Ygrtie 'Ni Y O qyt. yHy per �a m yr.. EY4:` c:� -~ q YM p�Y'^ w bra �.� �g `. :V t e Ia5'SI� �+t+�i � <W `� w`9'N E� a g Fp! 8 ado 9 $ $ $ •W O V q ` f �� fi $.s. oi�e cL }u -� �gst .L.� $ �; Ala E r mom. it gg = m r 4 go 21 i13 UZ got ts! ire, SG6w� S� `^ ZU ` :1¢ lit „ m '. �ii � Vim " � t ! Y m L IC d h._ &law= q w Q.Ck L pL O O. q � � 6 n••L y It 4s ®�$�. p�@ V y+s C b $te16 a :o »y � 32 a srS gas till !rft Yf V N. �Ij H � O kI CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE Oarch'28. 1900 0 TO: Chairman and Membersof the Planning Commission FROM: Brad 'Buller, City Planner BY: Beverly Nissen,' Associate Planner` SUBJECT: ENViaONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 89-21 - GREAT 'WESTERN`HOTELS - The development of a 6-story hotel total!ng approximately 107,811 square feet on 2 5 acres of land at the-corner of White Oak Avenue and Spruce Avenue in Subarea 7 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan - APN: 208-352-31; Related File: Development Agreement Amendment 89-01 and Development Agreement 87-01, rr I. PROJECT AND SITE'DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested Approval of the s i teL plan, grading plan, landscape plan, and elevations_amd issuance of the Negative Declaration. 6. Surrounding Land 3lse.and Zoning: Piorth Vacant; Indo-)trial Park (Subarea 7) South - Medical office„complex (under construction); Industrial Park (Subarea 7) ' East Vacant; Industrial Park (Subarea. ) West - Vacant; Industrial Park (Subarea 7) C. General.Plan Designations: Project 5,1te Industrial Park North Industrial Park South - Industrial Park East - ' industrial Park West - Industrial Park 0. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant and is rough graded. Surrounding streets are in place and` some Alnus rhombi€olia (white alder) street 'trees have been planted. Other than the street trees the site contains no significant vegetation. t r � ITEM b1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT OR 89-91 GREAT WESTERN.HOTELS ' March 28. 1990 Page 2 E. Parking Calculations Number of N`«= x of Type No, of Parking Spaces` paces 2-fuss Units Ratio Required 4rovided Hotel 124 I:unit 126 13 plus 2 for Mgr', II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The hotel site is "located in an area where A Development Agreement for the Foothill _Design and Commercial 'Center has been approved. The Development Agraeunt 87-01 established land `use regulations which superseded ,those in Subarea 7. The ,Development Agreement did' uot include hotels as a permitted use. The applicant has processed an Amendment to the Development Agreement to zllmi for hotels. This Amendment was approved by the Pla-aing Comnis'sion an January 10,.1990 and the City Council on February 1, 1390. D. Design, Review Committees The Design Review 'Committee Chitiea, Tolstoy; Coleman) originally reviewed the project informally on September 21, 1989. The Committee 'indicated that the applicant should make the following changes and resubmit the project: 1. More articulation and movement should be provided on the frnnt el evatiCn. 2, The tower element should be more substuntfal and dominant with more mass. 3. The elevation facing White Oak Avenue should be upgraded. It was felt that a focal point Is needed. 4. An enlarged detail of a typical_ window treatment sl►odld be provided', 5. Window treatment at the street level should be enhaficed. 6. The wall around the pool should be saftened with landscaping. The applicant revised their submittal and the project was �3 again, reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Chitea, i Tolstoy, Buller) on Dec •mber 21, 1989. The Committee did:.not approve the project and recommended that it be returned to theCommittee with the following corrections: 11 1 P'_ NNIN6 COMMISSICN STAFF REPORT DR 89-21 - GREAT WESTERN 'HOTELS-, March'28, 1990 Page 3 1. In order to create greater symmetry, for the frant elevation= th ';applicant should consider projecting the tower` element'out :'approximately',5, feet.-and centering a double row of arched windows under the`p+ak,of the roc'r element. The center tower element should also be increased in'siie. 2. The top" row of windows on the outs~ ^portions of" the building appeared. to be too close to. the hoof� line. Either arches should be added to the tops of the windows, the column element repeated,. or, a• ouoined surround applied around,, the 'window to provide more :`efinition- Quoins could';be constructed of, seine or, cone"r-te: The ^ distanc e from. the top of the. window to the bottom of the roof fine should. be increasea. 3. Foundation treatment "should be provided .with nratnr articulation, either through color, and/or repeating the cornice detail as a-`reveal',: 4. The widest section of the south elevation ,wal`1 was too blank' and should be enhe ced .61ther through addition: of windows or some other type of architectural'"-element. 5. The end tower elements "tshould either be raised or Increased, in size to - be; more in ,?roporti > with the overall mass of the building. 6. The root element on the :rear of the building;should be detailed to the came level as the':cornice &_ta;ii= L. The center portion of the rear elevation should project twelve inches to match the front elevation 8. A lighting . study should be done prior to issuance of building permits. 9. Design of the exterior 'lighting fixtures should be submitted. 10.: Consider' providing wrought 5,, elements to("'he wall around ttae pool area to'epan up the space. 11. . Decorative paving, additional pillars and 1ighting,should be provided at the rear_ertry. 12, ,Consider losing the. four parking spaces, at the `Font entrance. to the buildingand increasing the 1an15cape area or providing :the parking with. enriched paving. 13. Meandering sidewalks wi.l1; be required around the proiect: Low retaining wa7.'.s may be used where .necessary to take gip .grade. m . T PLANNING COMPASSION STAFF.REPORT DR 89-21 - GREAT WESTERN-.HOTELS March 28, 1990 , Page 4 14. A more detail.,material sample board should be provided. Additional`.accent colors may be used. Rev,sed plans, which aedressed the above issues, were submitted .and reviewed 'by the Design Review Committee on February 22, 1590. The Committee (Chitiea, Tolstoy,, Kroutil) still had concerns and requested that the.following items'be reviewed and approved at staff level.prior to schedul1gg Ahe project for review, by the Planning Cm-nissi'on. These concerns are as follows: 1. The following details as 'shown on Exhibits "GV and 1162" should be revised:,' a. All 'areas where stucco is :aoplied over wood shout be crisp and applied at a- 90 degree angle rathal -1 than curved as show-,: rb. On Detail 2, additional layering should be shown; for the arched wi:ndow.. The -detail provided does not adequately portray how the :window will appear. I I C. Detail 3 should also show additional layering below the rounded' detai1 I' d. Detail 6, scal I ops should be more substantial. e. Detail ;8, cornice should be 12 inches min'�.ium width. 02. A4minimum 5-foot-wide landscape area should'be located at the 'southwest side of the building rather than the 3-foot Space indicated. 3. The 'steps between the curb and the meandering sidewalk on White Oak`Avenue should be deleted. . 4. Additional 'textured paving should be provided at the north project entry all,. the way across''the, east/west drive aisle It :should also be added adjacent to' the 10-foot planter space. S. Additional textured paving should be • added in,- an eastwest direction connecting the entry walkway to the sidewalk along Spruce Avenue. 6. The top of'. ne storage area roof along the rear siJe'of the uuildinig should be finished with something' other than tar: pap0o or gravel to provide atira..*,w� use. from Aiacent upper story windows. :staff. has :reviewed the revisions submitted by the appizcant .< and;is generally satisfi;ed.' However,-specific' conditiohs,have been added where it ''•''was f"elt .further, clarification was' necessary. ' PLANNING COMMYSSYON 5TAFl.REFQRT OR 89-21.'- GREAT WESTERN ATELS _ March 28, 1996 k Oa 5 Technical= Review Committee: The T,ech�iical "Review Committee reviewed the project`bn Oecetntieh 19, 1;989"fnd determined "that with the" stanwd.` conditions 'of =approval, the 'project As . c ono stent.with,ai7_np01cable,.stndards and ponditions. " Q. Environraehtal Assessiren Part I,.of the -l.nitial 'Study,,_;W been•-completed by_ihe,applicant Staff -has completed Par64 " sf aiiE" En`vironment3l , :Checkiist;',and ; :found'• no 's"gnir'icant" ad verse, envirtnmtntal impact",as the 'result 'of th+$, project. If" ;the Commissimn concurs :with .tne" staff findings,. the issuance of a''Negative Declaration would'be in order.. III. COMMEND ON:' Staff recommends :approval of OR 89-21 through ption f the attached Resolution of approval with conditions / a iss ce of N2ga.tive'Qecyaration ,. t espec f sub ed, Drad,B ler ; City 1a�:ner BB:BN:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A -' Site, UtiIinti¢n Exhibit "B" - Foothil y` Commercial -,bes'ign Center Exhibit "G" - Landscape Plan Exhibit I Q". Grading Plan'; Eith.bsa,"E"` ;_Buil,ding Elevations` Exhibit "F" - Persr^ctives ,Exhibit "V Coniteuiction,De.tails 'Exhibit,"H" Floor, Plan Resolution of Approval I I 1 j __ _ . . _ __ :f <�i, x, ;, =��.i�H _ p � ,� u. � if 1"Qt ���•, ,pax; r ,�.—.�.3 ..�",' _ _ �- � s��1 t �*��°�r -r �; a L, ; \�� (� p.; � r y. � h � �,��� y; � � .,��r �� fi � �. #ter � �, ram--�'-�-rt- � v �. �� f�*�rc 3'x `5'� t,; �`'37t�j��5`T• l<3„�tg of+-,.� 4F--e. �,.`�. � 3 Z t S r .�. .� .i f p ` Ql�yill CL rA a,T ik�•:ryrsf� Q�� _'� '` Ill lI ®'> AND t i ew( FAV 1 Ate• +xr.urar.xonn.� . f 1 �r dAKi9FiAp�„ i/ II l CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE AND LIC.HSINc PLAN CISlix rrEM-- RANCHO CLTCA MUL Pumirc ExH�ffr= SCALE:'L �:. ! tN Yid "ks,g irc RRIN 4 7;% pia T ,§ , I a Isla— t .a.....e. •,w tM4.r 12t0' ia__�I RH Be9 1200— 4,';.r .� &F f i0.- ZZD-- 1240— mw Mee smet'IvN I.t1a! ter✓ Ct t70D^ Map MY CF. rMMI , 'fM.L= eta +- Of �►� PLAN tt DIV EXHI scat L-�nyZ.i"•• holy T� Inv lm- io ��.11® ! � ®. �• p��ll��-M��RL9al6��t'-a pea •• _ _ { i�iii `! "HiaR a� � r3cef3; lux al c I,+- i x Y' t 6, 9.1LI'f f r X1 �lPs;Nl��l xil tpp , i r��rd 'Ui. -x'i"..,r F S I?: ..t>6.. .�,. �t'!� ��+. �,{f,.7J� y,xf`��1� i■ {{ u.��1�'���t-y�W � � a ,= n t � � t��� e ��`q•1 7. DID �-i. .�—• Ilr*��� � a ���,,-' fir r �e � �® ® .�•� yip'/•_ f y/ Y I it ` c WWI V1{!� L fifalt'G e �Cy ��•� 'A 1 1. a A f 1; t at vmj 1 S / 1� a � a 0 s 0 1 S *C%U CUCAMONGA 3 MEIli6= R =2QLm2 EXr= SCA =- M -15 1 i y ICK wamthwce-� vx��rx4w a�,r - ,. y aimt�cuoe f=1 STEPS AND WALL COLUMNS.,.—,.�..• . o torraaaw!� aWNI � �l �y�• ' ,' tii OaY4aa9 �.�coeesr � � t� - %na�avr tom•:,,..— �.qrl+r�as�.,r - ._2 POOL AREA WAttc •Stairwell WNdaw Dotal I I Wr!Meha t1ata!�^ '�%��d�`��-++.. •• ofta plctitr'�v *•R�iLS�LVj; ''Rlt�1� { �,�-u+ '�—'-. �� � '. ra+ two _ •I� . UONT FOOTINGS. LKtiiT STANDA=ipS Trtm on Tower Its:Ca4om Dotal CUY OF i R _ ,etinr tr. 'a� f .ow CrrY OF rmn-PA 1 f } 41 71 t -14 n< i _ 1 L x - • t MY OF ,rr, RAI . ; ' -n(AMONCA ; its? `[I SCALE p. ►IESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTIOM,OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING OtVELOPMENT REVIEW NO: 89-21 FOR A SIR-STORY (6) HOTEL.TOTALIMG APPROXIMATELY 101,811. SQUARE FEET ON 2.5 ACRES OF LAND AT THE CORNER. OF WHITE OAK'.AVENUE- MD . SPRUCE AVENUE IN; 'SUBAAEA 7A OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLANp .AND' MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN:' 208-31 K-31, A. Recitals. (i) Great Western Hotels:has filed an application for �the approval of Development Review No. 89-s1 as described in the title of, this Resolution. Hereinafter in this, Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the appl'i'cation." On the 28th day of March,- of 1990, the 'Planning Commission ofe° -the City of RanchU' Cucamonga conducted a meetinp,,on the. application and concluded said meeting on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the: adoption of 'this Resolution have,occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereb, found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commnission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically, finds that.all of,thy facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A of this Resolution are true acid correct.': 2. Based 'upon substantial ev dence -`presented 1a; this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on March 28, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby spe'ci`fically, finds as follows: (a) The application applies 'to property `located at the northeast corner of Spruces and White Oak Avenues with a street frontage of ?55 feet along White Oak °Avenue,270 feet along Spruce Avenue, and 160 feet alor.g Eucalyptus Street and lot depth iijf 325 feet and is presently vacant; 'and (b) The property oto the north of the subject,, site is designated Industrial Park,' the property to the` south Ir7•the 'site consists of a medical office building',under construction,; the 'property to the east' is Industrial Park, and,the property,to the west is Industrial Park. 3. Based upon i;he substantial_evidence presented to this Commission during, the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of. facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 .above,, this Commissions hereby finds ',and: concludes as follows: j r? PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR.89-21'1— GREAT WESTERN HOTELS March 28,. 1990 Page 2 (a) That theproposed project is consistent withthe objectives. of the General Plan; and , (b) That the -0posed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of, the dfstrict In which the site is i located', and (c) That the proposed Use 'is irr 'compliance with each of. the applicable provisions of the Developmenv Code; and (d) That .tile; proposed rse;, together.:-wi"th the conditions applicable thereto, will not. be detrimen,tl_ to the public health, saf-J y or welfare, or mate''ria'l,ly inju.rious., to properties or improvements - the vicinity. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been.reviewed and considered in compliance with the, California Environmental Quality' Act of 1970'and, further, this •Commissioh-.:5ereby issuUs a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and;con-clusions set .orth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this ,Co:mnission hereby approves the applicationesubject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard ,. Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this references . i. Planning Division: 1. A detailed exteriar 'lighting plan to show j special techniques of lighting up the`buildfira; shall be submitted for City,P:lanner review;and - approval, prior ,to issuance otbuilding permits.' 2. Design of the exterior lighting fixtures shall be submitted for Design Review Committee review f and approval prior to the tssuanc2 of building { permits. 3. A minimum S-foot wide landscape area shall be located at the southwest side;of the building. I 4. Detail S of the cornice at the roof line shall !. be increased in.width te.` Z incites minimum. 5. WWI 6 of the'cornice along, the lower portion of the building shall be upgraded to provide A, more substantial lower lip.. ' ' 6 PLANNING COMMISSi'ON RESOLUTION N0. J'- OR 89=21 - GREAT HESTERN.HOTELS . March,28, 1490 Page 3 6. Textured pavement shall be provided`across"the= ." ci`rculatjon aisle, :pedestrian walkway, plazas and eutdoor,"open�.space areas; They shall be of, , brick or, the =pane_rs, e4osed aggregate; integral xolor` ,roncrete, or, a combination thereof...;' The, -design,., areas for textured pavement,: and samples of the textured materials shall be;_subeilitted for Design .Review Committee ' rev`tiew and approval prior to issuane of buildi'ng"P.ermits- 7. The top of the storage area roof.along-the rear side of the bu lding' shall ;be. finished.•vith Xk. , something other than tar paper• or grave, to ' bovide attractive 'views from adjacent.upper . s eory windows._ 8. A'continuous •hedgerows consisting ,of 5-gallon v size shrubs.planted at; 3 feet on center xhaI I r vid d 7 n f be'. ov "e a o street ronta a "to sdreen P 9 9 Parking'spaces. MM ;9. Landscape plans,rj s ah[ be h �consistent with I,. . standards ouitined" in Development �1 Agreemen t'81-01 10. A11- other applicable conditions.Of Development. Agreement 87-01 shallapply.i. IL The sate' shall 16e developed :and maintained in accordance, •with the approved site plan F,which includes architectural ' ele4ations exterior r "` '.Iaterials anC,6,lors,; landscaping and .grading on-site with the Planning Oiv ion, the conditions' , contained herein, and the Environmental Specific Plan. `' y U." Tree •maintenance -criteria ,to encourage the natural .growth characteristics of the selected" tree. species shall; be developed"and sui;miited for City Planner review and approval .pri6rcto; issuance of building permits. Enyineerino'Division: The existing combined median island and parkwpy landscaping .. irrigatf; n system. along SprucE Avenue shall I be separated to provide for , separate, maintenance al- the. medliii by the city and maintenance .of 7 the park way by this - development. PLANNING COMMISSION.RESOLUTION NO, GR 8941 - GREAT WESTERN HOTELS . March 28, 1,990'_ Page 4 t 2 The deve,pr shall obtain necessary easement's and construct drive approaches and drive aisles full "width along the project boundaries. a . sufficient.distance to serve the project, access points. _ t 3. Easements:> for joint use driVeNays " and drive aisles shall" be .provided; prior" to' building ; permit issuance.` The-easement's shall:.coverthe, , " drive aisles along the north property-,line from Spruce`Avenue to the"east.project"boundary and ._ from" Eucaiyptus,westerly a ,su'ffi.cient' distance to. servethe adjacent,_proper"ty. e., The meandering sidewalks shal , be constructed in accordance "with City "Standard.. 11rawing No.` . 304. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify-to the adoption of this Resolution, APPROVED AND AuOPTED THIS`28TH DAY"OF MARCH, 1990. . PLANNIW COMMISSJON OF THE CITY OF RANCHO,:CUCA.MONGA BY: Larry T, McNiel, .Chairman ATTEST:• Brad Bul Ter, ,Secretary, I, Brad Buller, Secretary.of the .Planning Commission'.o'f the City 'of R4nci+o Cucamonga,, do hereby certify that'" the foregoing Resolution was duly' and, regularly introduced, .pass--d, and adopted by `khe Planni,rg 'Commission of ahe City of Rancho Cucamonga a regular meeting of the Plannrng Commission held." on the28th day Of-March,-1090; by the lowing'vote-to-wit:, AYES: C0. , SSIONERS;: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: } �4 Y� 7'- rrr✓rg g '6 v Aa y 9 v� �,r o�� rrBv v rJrD �y+fie p0,r Q O r6ia•g�agw g[V�.Q'i ��' rd�g ey ���� �t�1��3/r� a 'GT+��+„ �� r• y '`t jyii77 :"o'�I�fY O O L,5 iio�� +A�'r �•+o`�i �yi.. �r"�'f°� 4a�!4`oi�a• � •i �0 4�iJrrB•$r• vo'�� i�� '• Qs'3r I s I s/ �Ie r ��e� or'"O.� '�rA{� �0 7t✓v'°di ar��6� + 0a ib$" B`�3yA3'bo' i ib $ msp I$ o$ 10 �@_�j+,'`o r"r r''•�.r,,q, or6ty a� •gr�sQre��y Ii+� aL�1 D`ia � p'�rpT/�tly'O r,�4 yY. `',' •�\ �eP�G`�^t�� s Vs NS' ' 'is 7► • �� IB� g r * `b ` rP a +d lb aJ �dt t RECTIO ' s" Ne�i �c R" * ' Ti r r r f( r ® �p q(p alMMqe NTm.wV .® s-r-ft-\bl �C q 5go5i$.y, 6 .�2M Z. m�r 1W:Ctd 4!•dp�: �8 dlgY qqi �Y` �y V�L9�y� V ®}YY�giS0601.uYi YA�tr $`ga01.yY t(�,. �.yb�C�..' �VV 6�Y.►Y_� W. `d]--a ale$ ag�'�uQ �4�. pj N� yy oy $ 79-�p �O'd' s-A C�i.G C^�D4� BOO '0 t3� ii UTm } O yyY.gpCa�� }�� YNN 94 29 75H -All Sol. 123 �IO�.N Y�i O 9 Y Yti r _ r IDy _ • N 01 rNo� p q p g ® b�q• f� __VpQ� ,d p.�i1.py 6�9 pSge.yy��Y Ca^ •��`[4� gp�� Y� {�Ye 16 p,� Nr�Y QY 'w�Y�w•. +YrA® d q �C ` L N _�.�w_6 p'J�r+ AQ OYgy9 6C Nw� a:� � �.��.Q 2-Qr Y y�/uYG gM�6yr �wry*Yy ../Yl`�• �O:f�� �� �>E■I S���YYpp:�� b�a]p v� u �7 yGGGGN_6 1 14 N`M iw1 ^_` N YJJ iila® ffiM ��ll 0 w , A N H t + Ir ` u a� is Me Is _ q$$ a 6 Y 4 ills Y®�tl o�f y' st f+• isVma Zia tl. tl�p QQa g•Cgil OB �.EF x yp 00 `.9 RR_�gp•,� Gmt oaf%a m ,cO IT Lbi It gig j Vib »gam S y S tl^may' fey�lva CCC� 7 pp �Ow eA � g tl� �$�j+ �yy -le .ye` ��pra tip VY�. pF a lira. w�9sp.V !6@Y¢?aL�n p® jJf• 4 ! b 11 i®gr0 ooze @ ;S6 I� Ilag _ is 29 as a- pift It Hui mill UU!'S. Nal =i, ass PH -1iif I r � $` pp V f y` R 6 _ q/�� �pp g$$g Atl. q 4 d AM�v pS V... GS� _ �YMy Ily Oe H. '. _ 4 71 iiiiit n . s V V 4�3 .13 ijq• .qp 4p 0 °Vfu»' q'i CYw Y^ S� YYY yY 4 i 4 Lf �b. j Pe MNq` ar jj$�. tl Y tl� m 6pp O�'M $ tlp,I.QNHq$yp � C. sa•^^ �... CC pp yl o ql C 9 Opp 6♦H ON � (q L 33 « �M M1l. MO qq V P� G ggy OO 6 N q °i =3 5m, 3,1,25$ AN� E S E 1-H _yy yy 1y�pq M .Y00 qyQ... �` . �yyqiy�Gq �Nty ���N41.Q:.M�a �yyy��.. 4� ���IIIN M�a �.b s q+\' `Y MO� rq.��y$ ��q _V Y4Q« +j$GA �r Is _.. IN IL Nil 0.All n p La r NY 13. at 932, e��. ala.l o�Ri e t oi 5 g ` wE �_ts.�j -H w mow( CCYy«y fisaZ .LLQ3j•, pia �� C YA' `m•l •yyyp�V !A L_ Q•YYYA t.l O O6 • `p... _ N_G pp6 i. ft _&.i.� W w9 yMylr'. C -g a.�QL ��4+ � ••0 4 � �tlY y•Ywgw®w® Y�®� (y O�M � 0 4 oj f fir u nY•) a •. � l■� B E! _Y•yyy' `ByC•tz.. Its. •i s ...0 wtl. NQ� 4YtlK;+ V h•� iy oHp s ^ �L �� ' Via^ qg■a$ pp �$ ig § $ g � q � e¢�C qa'b'� L�o�` �`a � m. � �• rMGa. 3T 1 3 b� � y 0- 01 DNf 41,0 Zma N e All, Is a.E IM Lto s � • ` � �$_ ��=s i sus s.. ` $ ,s.w �sI j-1 z � a F+q `8« ,�'em`•ae 3�� �'i.:f • aid •w� - s r U. a uP ao fi i �• 3$L 1 5 3HIS 3 a<p3 a v $ Sts 3- c. ^u♦.Ana o � ^3 � 'S 'L�. �. na" arc �g s ►. s~ _ as s EZ �o of a96 erg ^ya Mal So so H. G p sa O O s O Y N � a4 $ a 3 ers has gs as �� a III a�g sz � Xs IL2 ~ tee ' # t ^l • on a ® M ®des 2-1 Is as gal IS ' WD ' g2 !s 3 oar o _8y M +wi . $r3, �ii� N IVY ��• 6 }N � 0 Vlir�� ,o Il t,•' rga �'w+�•= i s vi � �• Y! V eN� �C it V bC�8ov G d .Gi ^ N Y. o 0 6 ~tl c Y L—y 5s.. C N �1YY = �A CNI V w.Ng O� C UYN Y p Q .N Y, M� rti 1*wZN �g V`�gtl��•- _� , � 1� $ 'navy 21 r `+1►M Yy�/b L.Nli LM ((@��+ MF•i Y M C. r. O a�@ �ew � Yb N Y> ON �. Y _P ice} it Y$` W 1. �. GGY��Qtt4 H RY t• .r 7.6 "F 5,-s.v yt YM maw. � �Q ` � V� t.1I kwM 6.Y 4P WMNC4Y 3 R .{ 1 ~t !XL ! i l " p e ®1 .v Ha 21 `,51 L &� j — CI 13 � N � � � Sri µ: ��=-�� w` -.I ; 791 _ i ■ Ms B` �y 3$ a V3 <:' .� � 9 3s111 ' O in• Mi r iV 1"1 � �l y_�� 0.: Kl gyp. 1 ! 1 ,� � i iii ii•• C L W c fu ou $Q� ur9 e� $u3 V EI ip. 9�g1=NZ39_ 7 Y V dw p rIVB CB ice+ • ',1.` Y •� g� 4 Hpp C Ai Ul I all sue•• m$ 6p7.e � ��e i)r rz A iQgg� Ll ! o.g z oR r fo a �AA mr Sib r V ® d Pyp s $i �' r.. ��[.. w• a �. u%o. ...M. �a tL�"�.r�j� '4�� �L 6n •� ,.�a YK S ��c/wA 7�®W ��6 CITY.OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' S T +`� REPORT t DATE March 28, 1490 TO: Chairwan and Nlembprs of the Planning Commission FROM; Braa .Buljer, Gity. Planer BY: Sresz :^; r A5socizte Piertrar Ett, SUBJECT: MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87-42 SOUTH PACIFIC E.. "FINANCIAL CORPOR;TION - A requ•-st to modify the" epproved mat building erials"for an existin build n,' in the Tennis " Executive Center, located at'10'750 Civic Center [irive'- z APN: '208-08243. i f' i. BACKGROUND: This- protect, a two-story office building, was approved en October 19, 1987. During the construction of the j building. stafx noted that the wrong tile, stucco tolor, and accent color had been used, The contraCto;r "wad issued a t correction notice to replace these iteme...with the a0roved .stucco color, accent color, and tine on file fit the Planningr'qtVisia�,' do February 22, 1g90,'the applicant filed-a requeat ;to:change the exterior the and colors so that no reconst'vuction. Oould be necessary .(i.e., the, tilt would not need to be replaced). The request was take�t o' the Design Review Committee. The Committee . decided, after having time,to_ visit the 'site, that the tile.:and accent color should be replaced with the .approved ;colors and materials. The Committee also referred' this item, for fu11 Commission discussion tonight. I1, ANALYSIS: Exhibit "V depictF the approved elevations. The the in qup�tion covers the centre. tower elements on both the.north, and south elevations. The accent color covers the metal trust: and y:sardrails. Scmplos of the ar-built tile and accent.colors (both blue), the is-built stucco color, the 'approved tile (beige),.Ithe approved accent color (green), and the approved stucco color will. be available for the Commission`s review Uiight The applicant Insists that the colors ,were revised in a new material sample board which Was submitted to the `Planniq Division sometime in July of 1984. The accent color was chaanglbd from green to blue and the stucco color (a white) ;gas modified nnly_� 'Slightly, Staff researcheC the project file,:and found no dr%cumentation 'or, evidence' that the color. changes:were aver submitted to the Elesign Review Committee for riev,iew antl INLANN,ING C6PlMI5STON STAFF-REPORT " 2 OR 8742 'SdUTH, PACIFIC FINANCIAL CORPORATION _ March 28,,`1993 - f Page 2t approval. The color changes, however,, are a minor item: ,n relation to the,tile.;change Even according to the ap';Titanty a change from the approved the ,was never requestied`. In, ad74tionjs a related problem Ws also discovered >trtng," inspection of;;the, bui;ding,= ; The iI on the tesver„ S'c ;was not wrapped ai 60d the inside of the.coT,�3mns, as.depictea on`,i he approved. building`""%elevations. There.fore;'addittonal the work• Would be necessary. even i f tF;e as-built file .is; approved by;the Commission. " The-missing ti i:e .on`-the -columnstends,to make.,tfie central' tower gll 1nt #,appear ffal �;and one-dimensional ; III, RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommend's•that the Comm siion review, :the- applicant's request and' approved and ,as-built/ tiles 'and .colors, The Cotmission should; visit,'the'site if necessary to determine if r the applicant's request "should bE grunted, Staff recommepds that . the m issi support t.,be recommendation Qf the .Ces ,gnAeview Co tte to�equire proper installaton`� of•the approved ~tiles: 7 Co iss n also needs to provide 3irection on, the accept lor. The vision,.can be.is`sde by minute a,dtion Respe tfuil su tted, `"ry Brad Buller City Planne BB•BH°irdg� Attachmentm: Exhibit "P,. ,Applkant's letter ' Exhibit '"B" - Building Elevations Exhibit "C" _ Site Plan- a � a 5 x 1 -A a t ®CU A'P AC!FHC aaNaa�a�ao.aA4�a�ePxaae3s ,dTaas�a: March 1.9, 1990 Mr Brad Bueijer Planning Department- ;r City of Rancho Cucamonga 9350 Baseline Avenues Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 ;l n Re: 2 Story, Office Building 10750 Civic Center Drive Dear Mr. `Bueller: I am enclosing a copy of the letter sent to Mr. Brett"Horner,. dated February 22, 1990, .from Western States Dev;?lopment Company, our General Contractor, Please .also refer to th� :anepage statement from Mr.. Jim Banks, the immediate ;easternly neighbor and the only person who has complained' to #.'e ?lanning -Department regarding the building., In view of these two letters and the fact that -South Pdcifio Financial Corporation is loosixig time and- money"and being S Djb ected to a lot ofaggravation by not knowing when we can take occupancy of the building, we urgently request that this matter:-:be included _ on the agenda .on Marl.h 28, 1990. A check fbr the filing fee in the amount of $251.00 is. enclosed. It seems the only ones being hurt by this is 'South Pacific._, Corporation, the contractors and Sub--contractors.' Not-Only have there been no-other complaints ,:hax- wep are aware of, but all of our: neighbors have complimented pis en the beautiful building that we have erected. If you havee `the opportunity to ,make an inspection yourself, I-:am confident that you will 1 find the site aesthetically pleasing.. If it becrmes nernssary. to tear down a portion of the structure, ar, unnecessary, amoun�: A cf time would be involved in redoing, <thereby causinq this corporation an additional financial burden.' Already', ,everal delays have occurred and r' we-of this magnitude"req"1Ares a great deal of planning ana`" sefEduling. we will greatly appreciate your assistance in resolving thss i matter and accepting the colors as they now are. Very truly yours, Donald M. Rosenthal, �L President- -. DMR/sg 10556 CIVIC CENTER LIIaNE.SUITE 2C]17A,fiANGHO CLiCANlO\GA,Cl>L1F.5173d 714✓�33 2�6� i P Ch'sox 1Q 16 RANCHO'tUCAMONGA,CAdF Z;'7e9-1016 FF Cpl. CAIII ga rr ' ✓1� _+J .L Gas—.Y.l i c _ G r .i�_- ^'�, /Pft+C rl—G S-�-r+�yj/ a; r WESTERN ,STA',rES ;®EVELOPMENI POa { 1l2a5l ti fATM SI'.zSW7E 136,s(714)'j Yi Ljj664 0yII44= FEBRUARY 22. 19�90 MR BRETT HORNED;.,AND 'THE DES I.GN REVI EX COMM I TTE�' PLANNING,DEPARTMENT 9350 CASELINE AVE.,�, .. AX. CALIF. 91730•4APCHO..rUCr�iGA.RE 2 STORY .OFF;`CE. BUILDING i 0750 C 1 V i'C CEMTER DR;1:VE; DEAR BRETT AND COMM117-FLE,MEMBERS., THANK `t0U FOR: TAKING-THE T I,ME TO:'HEAR OUR REQUEST,T, WE ARE THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR 'FOi THE: RBOuE-MFNTi.ONED PROJECT. AT TH'I S' DATE' WE ARE VERY C>_bSE ,7 0,, L:, PLET I NG THE BUILDING AND HAVING THE TENANT OCCUPYTHE UNIT., IT CAME TO OUR RECENT ATTENTION-: SOMFjOF .TNEEXTERIOR, COLORS pu'{ OT'MATCH THE ONES tNALLY.SUBNi,I TTED BY J. t THE ARCH'ITECT,-LONG BEFORE' WE GOT={ INVOEVED-z THERE ARE TWO. SPEC iFIC AREAS I WISH TO ADDRESS ii�.THiS LETTER: THE EXTER 1 OR ACCENT COLORS.AND THE DER liOR T I LLE , COLOR. OUR APPROVED SET 'OF JOB517E PLANS STATES ON4PAGE A 5". DETAILS 1 AND. 2, THAT BRONZE BRAKE METAL. 15 TO"BE.USED. " THIS- CAN BE CROSS-REFERENCED ON:THE SPEC.= SHEETS AGE` SP-=4. SEGTION '08400 SUBTITLE-2-0-1. ,+ ` REGARDING THE OT14ER EXTCRIOR ACGL'NTS: "PLEASE"REFER TO PAGE A-13. SECTION 3>,: "COLOR TG.'MATCH'TRUSSES (LIGHT z RAULSp� :ALSO SECTION 7 ;.`TRUSS PA iNTZD,.TO �7ATGN,.GUARD�` I REGARDING THE EXTERIOR TILE. HUMAN .FALL IB1LI'TY AND ERROR NTERED THE PICTURE:; OUR�SUB-CONTRACTOR. TILE KING, iN ryi:rl �1 A MISTAKE---.A BIG; HONEST.-MISTAKE. HE SOMEHOW WROTE ;OUWN THE WRONG .NUMBER, '.Qf� THE MANUFACTURER, SENT THE WRONG TILE. AND THE WRONG-T I LE-WAS INSTALLED.. SINCE THE,•M I STAKE. WAS'' .`' � DISCOVERED LONG AFTER THE TJLE BOXES WERE-`HAULED T0•THE.' DUMP, TILE KtNG. HAD: NOrRECOURSE AGAINST THEM. A BLUE,SHADE`` WAS USED RATHER`"NAN. A.TYPE OF BEIGE COLOR THAT`HAD,BEEI•d _ APPROVED. I CAN TELL" YOU MOST ASSUREDLY THAT THIS .HUMAN ERROR WAS NOT AN.'I;NTENT i ON�iL EFFORT?QN, THE-PART OF ANYONE.,. . '. ' S i NCE THE SAME GP,ADE AND QUALITY OF, T{LE>';WAS;_USED., WE RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT YOU=GRANT US'A RFVISION. ' AND ALLOW THE .BU(LDING'S PRESENT APPEARANCE TO. STAND AS IT WE HAVE BUILT WHAT: I BELIEVE TO BE A POSITIVE ADDITION TO_ :THE CITY OF,;RANCHO CUCAMONGA. .ANEi A;.F I NE.;-CCt4PLETI ON TO THE TENNIS EXECUTIVE CENTER,COMPLEX. IT HAS BEEN AT LEAST' COMFORT1NG T0� HAVE;HEARD THE COMPLIMy ENTARY RESPONSES 'FROM`PEOPLE ABOUT,"THE. BEAUTY OF THE BU I LOCI NG, PART I CULARY FROM THE. HIGH LEVEL- STAFF PtOOLt, FROM Soo T H'. PACIFIC FINANCIAL CORPORATI'A WHO VILL. OCCUPY T4E BU"ILDING UPON COMPLETION':" THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATI ON .' IN THIS, MATTERS SINCERELY YOURS. FRED GILDNER aI i-i A F.' ' _ .f �1Li,�I(t f iI i,If r11 ,,.=ii�'���l��,'ir' ■ j h1��F v iAW���Nle°9�� f�l`���.t E'�it .' ��t r�J'1-aC�'(fy■ � r rK,la��xi r{ .ts;0.'�lr i a� .K n�lu nulx�unuu"q I(Iltlllllll y��lll�tiiii►����,iIK�'="�:`�ifi�iienf�itE� (r I r .w s , f 4,�1 Ilflli III�MI{��4l11�I rilylyllJgllfl(l�l�� ,.' ., ,p111IIN(I liZlitl; :►g�,,�;,,111IIIIH�,�� t_11�-���Ilt r tii 1 t A . S l E,rr571NG f� t PER r, \1 PLM # �o -A OIJ OWE Qom;. T.T T Sff E�*WN lz c� 61 K r, f 31 �h € f';jbW'. Y c•' MSS ��� i ru L,...e7`t l Tf �� i � •� �a. • � t'�-� ,_"� �1' fi+ � it tic! UM,.,.a r' L':� `Sn Y�r. �£3'': �.}rw^'J* { x a _ ., }9ev�.•q N tt$ � `G�4'* qq t Y p x F"^ .� tex ,�arasciu����en>;nrtm�bnDcros�°rs>ct •rva w=` ti�s+4 �fi '?a����,.k i `"� `*• �xyar�,itt�lc''atae?v:�.'fit^"�rY cti�ca�'p`�'�v:��i '+°Y'4�� �. "'°" ' '�r+� "� Y y '�..$-V ��.R�-yrt7"�sF "t 7 • ��' 4 � r�'r.�� �D k` P1, 21, At zt '���y '�+'3hf.4 j. .Mkt t,� / �{{ � �w �•''�•`:�� ' 1. t kZ 7 a t f ys {{ it`it�.�`F.l,rsc•v^.`A err ss.^'a�ras�z�i"�w.s .� �, R ,�' x' �t`� .� S x Alv-1� seAaxs�rse Kim sm min t;SuRax,:�r3rsu�z.,:�,s.cfn�ssart:.za�;:�:^�¢.;tt�. �'_.� �a�sa�+` �y�.�•`, a a + a to Mum WV, jt lama r t ° F 7 '�ia'4�.-..ace j•„e". _!c 1 .{y { +4fi'�� { M' a,u`teta.s:rs' aa.•a..,.�ttas:m=svcTs., ��, �.�ratar...xa:a t :�ha.� a:.�a,..z:�+o� r r.,iss,�.•^s.•.z.�...aa_ ��. ,��,�� � r�:.� � � rrv � y ras,a wrwe7^'fab' S .m e^ •��a:. - ��; y�v��,s33s� r:-s:a.�s was +auxau ,e t 5°. r -,s'� • + Y� skl 5 N G. gs .aYSilfiTa+y. t� 3�f'L.tx+ `,�T�C`.J`•"a233`.S�L"x"."..*..,�F•;2'.$aL'i4:iA. K �. #.T{ �'1+.�11�x w E'i:��wr.N`�. uM_...+•ew�`T.���IFi"^b�lw�"���� Z�ft }�r�^', �$. y> .�� ��+• �� a +� 7..0y p i h ,.�,.•.... .Oa-. P aR �.'� �'w..°,�•—•t �ids h ti f� �a .% �� 41 ti a 1 L z 5 a L t .a. ..... U)1.! CA fn J ti to rn F 0 s