Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990/09/12 - Agenda Packet0701--02 o09 -12 -90 PC Agenda o i -of 5 w �CAMn . e CITY OF 0 R]�ATTNAG",-I0 CLr�A((NX'?\rAAj� Roq� �p� �pc� / ��� .CLAi�ITNINIG ! C�.01i�'B:.V ISSI�J.L�( z AGENDA, 1977 WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 12, 1990 7:00 P.M. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBER 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE PANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOR,MIA 1. Pledge of Allegiance II. Roll Call Commission.^: Chi ti ea Commissioner Tolstoy Commissioner McNiel Commissioner Weinberger _ Commissioner Mel cher III. Announcements IV. Approval of 11isgtes Adjourned Nee:Al -ag of July 31, 1990 August 22, 19?i4 V. Consent CaTendi The following Consent` Calendar items are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed ;For discussion. A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMI','78 -03 AMENDMENT - SAM'S PLACE - A request to extend the hours of operation for an existing bar and restaurant, located at the northwest corner of Carnelian and 19th Street in the Neighborhood Commercial District - APN: 201 - 811 -56, $8, 59, and 60, (Continued from August 22, 1990.) B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMEPT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 90 -05 -' JETER DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION - The development of a Department`;of Motor Vehicles office building totaling 14,167 square feet on 4.5 acres of land in the General Ind!rstrial District (Subarea 3) of the Industrial �tiecific Plan,, located at the northeast corner of 9th SYest and Hellman Avenue - APN: 209- 022 -14 and 15. VI. Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concgrned individuals may voice their opinion of the . related 'praject. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by,,, stating your name and address. All such opinions `shall .be limiters to >5 minutes per individual' for eazh' project Pl,� se ign in after speaking. C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 1454a - PATSCHECK /HACKBARTH`- A residential subdivision and Design` Review to convert 328 apartment units to.. condominiums on 29.51 acres of land in 'the Low- Medium (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) and Medium (8 -14 dwelling__ units; per acre) zone of the Etwanda Specific Plan, located at ttti2 northeast_ corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Highway - APN: 229- 041 -11. (Continued free August 22, 1:990.) a 0. AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY'S STREET NAMING BOOKLET-AND l..�t STREET NAMING QRDIN NCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 12.12 - CITY a OF RANCHO CUCAF5NGA - Proposed amendments to the City's, policises, procedures, and regulations regarding the naming of streets as contained- in the Street Naming Booklet and City Code Chapter 12.12. (TO BE CONTINUED.) E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT' 14644 - GARCIA DEVELOPMENT - A residential subdivision of 8 single family lots on 4.16 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (1 -2 dwelling units per acre),` located at the end of Camellia Court, north of Hillside Road, east of Beryl Street - APN: 1061- 381 -13.' F. "ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT SJ -03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA — !, proposed amendment to adjust the northern boundary of ;oubarea 8 on the west side of Rochester Avenue northerly 3$0 feet, westerly, 1,065 feet, and southerly 1330 feet to -its present boundary with Subarea 7; delete the planned extension of Day Creek Boulevard between Rochester and Milliken Avenues; and realign a portion, of Day Creek ' Boulevard east of Rochester Avenua. The purpose of this ` amendment is to accommodate Zhe. 'development of a City sports park at the northwest corner of Rochester. Avenue and Arrow Highway - APR; 229- 011 -05, 06, and 24 and 229- 02 -15, EC, 28, 34, 41,'42, 44, 45, 33, 54, and 55. p G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 14072 - C.T.K. ING. - A residential subdivision of 22 si"4 e `. family lots on 10.81 acres of land in the ''low Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) located at the southwest corner of Highland Avenue and Jasper Street - APN: 201- 212 -12. H. MODIFICATION TO TENTATIVE 7PUKT 13527 - WATT INLAND EMPIRE IRE - A r e est u t q o modify a .condition of approval requiring private maintenance of interim drainage protection facilities by a Homeowners' Association f r.a residential subdivision of 231 single family lots on 108.48 acres of land in the Low Residential District,[­-_ 4 dwelling units per acre) locatec',at the northwb- corner of Etiwanda Avenue ants 24th Street APN: 225 - 071 -65. VII. Old Business MOOIFICPRTION TO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 89 -14 - AMPAC INC. - A request to modify-75n itions of approVal- relating to the timing of on- and off -site improvements for a previously approved project consviting of two manufacturing buildings totaling 26,0,G0 square 'feet on 39.3 acres of land in the Heavy.Inetustrial District, Subarea 15 of the Industrial Specific Plan, located at 12167 Arrow Route -APNt- 229- 121 -15. (Continued. from August 22, 1990.) VIII. Director's Reports i� 's{ �J J. PREP*ITNARY REVIEW 90 -19 - CALIFORNIh COPPER RECYCLING - A 1 ,)rmination of street widening and - utility undergrounding requirements as a result of the proposed scrap operations. K. COUNTv REFERRAL 88 -05 - UNIVERSITY CREST - Master Tentative Tracts, Final Development Pian Map, and various Tentative Traci Maps for 1,293 .single family residential units, 6.3 acres of - comnerrial., 4.56 acre park site, and 7.17 acre school MitE for University Crest Planned beveiopment Proposal on 425,16 acres of land located north of Highland Avenue, south if utility corridor, east of Lay Creek Channel, with portions west of Hanley Avenue and portions west of Etiwanda Avenue within the City's Sphere of Influence. The proposal also includes the dedication as permanent open space of 675 acres located within the National Forest. IX. Commission Business L. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS X. Publiic Comments This is the time and place for tie general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which: do not already appear on:this'agenda. N y 'O C m S ° u F n o lo z' 3 �= `o ' i s •e n u 4y °. •c 'O .� A .� .7 C � � n u 32 9 � � � •o � ,� � 'o •C a `o u 3 c c � a .0 F o. IY !+ C G u 9 R u w S $ C u o � E •� 9 �J 2 ° p r y m= n d W u� 1 1 6o; foot E-, Q W z z P-a � W �o W z � 3 Q w W z r- 0 U r7" WU V1 w a w Z� cn x W ua r % 1` f 9� p P 7 ppp, I iy ff � 1` f 9� p P 7 ppp, I iy 0 F U � ao z� Wr �H U W W l� } .Ia . �i �a �A z Wx �z N Q3 a � W m m Z Z¢ Q ao z w U a a r w H a �W A IrR 4'::!. is a S 3 w w F � ZZ 6y 3y wF �F �_ Nq 7 >� YL cr c z � x LTJ �Q .• j � w h . a` p Ilk f .� U q z. r 3N �U it { 11 I � t y G:�t , • a z ; �2' �. i CITY OF R.ANC RO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT S,. DATE: September 12, 1990 TO: Chairman and Members, of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Senior Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 76 -03 AMENDMENT - SAM'S PLACE - A request to extend the hours of operation for an existing bar and restaurant, located at the northwest corner of Carnelian and 19th Street in the Neighborhood Commercial District - APN: 201- 811 -56, 58, 59, and 60. (Continued from August 22, 1990.) I. BACKGROUND On August 22, 1990, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to review the proposed request as described above. The Commission directed staff to prepare a Resolution of Approval extending the hours of operation from 11 p.m. to :12 midnight on Sunday through Thursday, and from 11 p,m. to 2 a.m. Friday and Saturday. A full menu should be available during all business hours. The Commission also atated that the use should be reviewed in six months for compliance with the Conditions of Approval. Attached for your review is the Resolution of Approval with the appropriate conditions. If the Commission concurs, then adoption of the resolution would be in order. Res 51. 1y sub ' Bra B er City Planner BB:NF /Jfs Attachments: August 2Z, 1990 Planning Commission Staff Report Resolution of Approval __j ITEM A DATE: is TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: I. II. ti —° CITY OF RANCHO Cl1CAMONGA STAFF REPORT a August 22, 1990 Chairman and Members of the Planning "ommission Brad Buller, City Planner Nancy Fong, Senior Planner CONDITIONAL USE PrRMIT 78 -03 AMENDMENT - _SAFE'S _PLACE - A request to extend the hours of operxti,ar for an 'existing bar and restaurant, located at the northwest corner of Carnelian and 19th Street in the Neighborhood Commercial District - APN: 201- 811 -56, 58, 59, and 60. ABSTRACT; The applicant is requesting that the Axisting condition of approval limiting hu;.rs of operation from 11 a.m. to 11 p.m. be amended by extending the closing time to 2 a.m. BACKGROUND: In ^ r for the Planning Commission to assess the applicant's requesl, it is important to review the background. The bu =irgss location has a long history of non - compliance and nuisance problems by prior tenants as summarized below: i' On DecemLcr 27, 1975,' the Planning Commission conditionally approved the Boar's Head restaurant with bar and entertainment. Due to consistent i`amplaints relating tc, noise, loud music, fights, and loitering, the PlaW -ov Commission had reviewed the Conditional Use Permit several times and modified the conditions of approval to mitigate the4e problems. Same of th- mitigation measures added ware limited hours of operation to 2 a.m., structural changf-s to buffer noise, and installation of speed _ bumps within the shopping cente7. In 1983, the Planning Commission again reviewed this Conditional Use Permit due to complaints received and modified the conditions of approval through more restrictive hours of operation (11'p.m. l closing), additiona noise attenuating materials to reduce exterior and interior noise, and required implementation of a dinner menu. In 1985, the Planning Commission further modified the Conditional Use Permit by keeping the operating Nours to 11 p.m., and eliminating the live entertainment use. On September 6, 1955, the City Council heard an appeal by the applicant and upheld the decision'of the Planning Commission. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF'REPORT ' AMENDMENT TO CUP 78 -03 - SAM'S PLAC` August 22, 1990 Page 2 i In April of 1988, the Boar's Head closed and Was reopened as Strattons under different ownership. No complaints were received ' during the period that Strattons was open. III, ANALYSIS: A. General: This applicant took over the business of Strattons in March of 1990. Thp business is renaffiLd_Sam's Place. It serves ':usch and dinner with full bar facilities but without, live entertainment. There are no changes to the interior. The menu has an Italian emphasis as shown in Exhibit °C." The dinner menu has mcre variety than the previous businesses of Strattons and Boar's Rad Bar 8 Grill. Attached for your reference is a letter dated May 11, 1990, describing in detail the business and the reasons for their request to extend the closing time. B. Extension of Hours of Operation: The current operating hc,:rs for the tar and restaurant are limited to between 11 a.m. and 11 p.m. The condition of approval was imposed to address the past problems of disturbances and noise. Since the limitation of hours of operation was imposed in 1985, the City has not received any complaints frcm surrounding residents. The request to extend the hours to '2 a.m. may create an opportunity for 'problems 1i the future.. The site is very close to single family residences at the west side as shown on the site plan, Exhibit "A." Parking 'areas for the pavrons of the bar could overfiow to the parking a &a immediately west of , w the building which abuts the residences. Certain activities such as drunkeness, noise, loitering are likely to occur due to the nature - of the bar business. Such 'activities could adversely impact the adjacent residences. C. Purpose of Neighborhood Shopping Center: The purpose of a neighborhood shopping center is to provide for immediate day - to day convenience ,hopping and services for the residents of the immediate neighborhood. Site development regulations and performance standards are intended to make land uses in the shopping center compatible and harmonious with the character of surrounding residential areas. - Staff -is concerned that extending the hours of operatic; until 2'a.m. may not be in harmony with the single family character of the surrounding areas. f) ANIL PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT a;IFNDMENi TO CUP 78 -03 SAM'S PLACE August 22, 1990 Page 2 In April of 1988, the Boar's Head closed and was reopened .:its Strattons under different ownership. No complaints were received 0!-ring the period that Strattons was open. ` III. ANALYSIS; A. General: This applicant took over the business of Strattons in March of 1990. The business is renamed Sam's Place. „t serves lunch and dinner < with full bar facilities but wi'thc` live entertainment. TM.ere are no cluanges to the interior-. The men,- has an Italian emphasis as shown in Exhibit "C." The dinner menu has more varlity than the previous businesses of Strattons and Boar's Head Bar b Grill. Attached for your reference is a letter dated May 11, 1990, describing in detail the business and. the reasons for their request to extend the closing time. G. Extension of Hours of Operation: The current operating hours for the bar and restaurant are limited to between 11 a.m. and 11 p.m. The condition of approval tras i,aposed to address the past problems of disturbances and noise. Since the limitation of hours of operation was imposed in 1985, >the City has not received any complaints from surrounding eesidents. The request to extend the hours to 2 a.[rt. may create an opportunity for problems in the future, The site is very close to single family residences at the west side as shown on the site plant Exhibit "A," Parking;.areas..for the patron of the bar could overflow to the parking area immediately west of. the building which abuts the residences. Certain act?vities such as drunkene.ss, noise, loitering are likely to occur due to the natcre of the 'bar business. Such' activities could adversely impact the adjacent residences, C. Purpose of Neiohborheod Shnopinq Center: The purpose of a neighborhood shopping center is to provide for immediate day" to day` convenience shopping and serviaps for the residents of, the immediate neighborhood. Site development regulations and performance standards are intended to make land uses in the shopping center compatible and harmonious with Vie character of surrounding residential areas. Staff is concerned that extending the hours of operation until 2 a.m. may not be in harmony with the single family character of the surrounding areas. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AMENDMENT TO CUP 78-03 - SAM'S PLACE August 22, 1990 Page 3 The apprrcant pointed out that the Planning Commission had approved other bar and restaurant businesses with longer ° operating hours in the evening, such as the Pepper's Cantina, at the northeast corner of 19th Street and 'Archibald Avenue. In reviewing Pepper's Cantina restaurant and bar, staff finds the situation different, as there are no single family residences immediately abutting the site. - There are apartments located on the east side of the site while. Pepper's is closer to Archibald Avenue on the west side. The single family residences are all buffered from Pepper's Cantina by Archibald Avenue and 14th Street, D. Fire and Sheriff Deoartments: Both the Fire and S °.ariff Departments have been contacted for comments. Tht- Fire Department indicated that they foresee no problems with the extension of hours of operation. However, the Sheriff's Department recommended maintaining the existing closing time of it p.m., given the history of the site. E. Conciusion`: Based on the above, staff concluded that the extension o.' the hours of operation may be.detrimental to the surrounding single family residences because of their close proximity and because of the nature of the bar facilities. Therefore, staff would not recommend the extension of the hours of operation. Should the Commission disagree, other options are available: 1. Approve request, i,e., 11 a.m. to 2 a.m. daily. 2. Approve extension to 2 a.m, for Fridays and Saturdays only. 3. Approve a lim•.^ted extension, possibly to 12 p.m., tither daily or on Fridays and,Satur•days.only. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS :. In order to ,approve this application, ire full or in part, the following findings must be made by the Planning Commission: A. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code,' and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. B. The proposed use rill not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or II PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AMENDMENT TO CUP 7' SAM'S PLACE August 22,'1990 Page 4 C. The proposed use complies 'with each of the applicable *. provisions of the Development Code. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised ie The Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has biieh posted, and, notices have been sent to all propev�y owners within 300 feet of, the project site. V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny the request to extend the hours of `operation to 2 a.m., or consider one of the options noted above.: Attached for your review is a copy of the Resolution of Denial for your adoption. Respectfully submitted, Brad Bur er City Planner BB :NF /ifs Attachments: May 11, 1990 Letter from Applicant Exhibit "A" - Site Plan Exhibit "B" - Floor Plan Exhibit "C" - Menu for Sam's Place Resolution of Denial ;t /j ANNERINO t _ 1 V%1Wa'o* JOHN D.MANNEAINO SALBRIGUGLIO May 11, 1990 Mr. Brad Buller CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Planning Department 5310 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Buller: Please be advised that vs represent Sam's Place, doing business at the address as set forth in the attached Uniform Application for Conditional Use Permit. The current owner, Luanne R. Pellegrino, took possession of the Business during the second week of March, 1990 and purchased the 'business from Thomas Mulholland, who did business as Stratton's, on April 23, 1990 . White the format of the menu has changed significantly to emphasize Italian food, nevertheless, the primary nature of the business during the hours after 9:00 p.m. remains that of a small fog* and beverage vending establishment. Since the hours that were limited by the Planning Commission during the period of time the business was known as the Boar's Head, requiring to closure of 11.00 p.m., other liquor vending establishments have opened in the town to increase the competition. We direct your attention to the number of bar and restaurants which are at the corner of Foothili and Haven, ona, perhaps more appropriately, the bar next to Pepper's Cantina, which is at the corner of Archibald and 19th Street. It is I am sure obvious that this places our client at a significant disadvantage in attempting to compete In the marketplace with other similar establishments whose business is the sale of food and alcoholic beverages. It is therefore necessary to expand the hours to thoa which are allowed by the Alcohol Beverage Commission, six (6) days a week, if this business Is to be a visble one to the new purchasers. We invite your attention to the record of the establishment run by Mr. Mulholland and point out to you that its record Is virtually devoid, to our knowledge, of any claims or incidents, disturbances or criminal activity, at or near this establishment for a period of time in excess of two (2) years. Both Mr. Mulholland and the currant owner, who has been in possession siace March 12, 1990, have ta=ken great pains to run an establishment which is orderly, quiet, and entirely in accord with the law. There is no reason to i presun.e. that this circumstance will change were the hours of operatfon to be extended an additional three (3) hours. The manager of this restaurant, the husband of the owner, Saco Pellegrino, has managed bars and restaurants In New York for ten (10) rears prior to their move to the City of Ranc o Cucamonga and clearly demonstrates the apabliity of maintaining order and propriety in an establishment such as this, 9333 BASELINE ROAD. SUITE 110 /RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA 91730 /TEL (714) 980.1100 /FAX (714) 941.8610 A - Mr. Brat! Buller CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA May 11, 1990 Page 2 - We therefore respectfully request that you consider this expansfan of hours to require a closing time as set forth by the Alcohol Beverage,Comdnission. This is absolutely necessary to allow this business to compete wlth other like businesses in the area and will cause no hardship whatsoever on the surrounding community. VerJR1 s, MA BRIGUGLIO By: Inne f JD drf� f 4-7 T ,, �caom..0 uns.awr.o ...•wY..r. n °an. �.. •: tom. IVI14d34 W11A VI. d 313CG1031fHOUVZ4 1111 ' — „�- ^�a�tt:CC -1 roa•e o141v'i N tt13 f30tl an +ails 0311VLIo: Ii,I i d st It ,A„�„.- r,�r... r • r ,..I� rl �. •S +S Iy�yy �4 ' ilz ! 4ji: �! af s Etst�i� 4 ¢I c?'� = _ 0911{ • MII •_111' _ ' � •�-- 5 { tat si LIJ -T t 1 W iEl+ Iii L 10 N4Nilt./ � - js fit J L� Ile, ?Qh 2 0 ri A -IF sir Lill -.5-S 1 lei sit' 0 JU eQ ftj�-Izr 01 ul' if W W uj n _ C `} to V m t s C �y d. m O O X w of a�a ej t O W V pq SK. AL LLI Q -40e o 1, uri a} a aA Ea N M N .MM a! • j( yy � t P ,� �' t �„� SKr. Q �•, -. if O° °S N w � =W o uTW1 O m ? } X g[ 0) v IA W a! b YES yy � t P h 6 -. v IA W a! b YES YOS P h 6 } W $ � i } S �Ew i �� l 2 •m N • = tu�pp } i w O Lu 44 i LU ia W N UJ LL L6 4 a a CL W o W w a n+ 71 m O. S. U. O L 5. O G CNi W' W O ga S x g 8 W ,0,2 $ LL Qi W Q G 8 N ,yy'. .'t` S. iii d W Z» IS Q. A. ii N p=,. � W W v IA �- 9�' . �.'^{ i�' 7c�' ag` AeF •`?y..:�*5'6'�'.`- `?ir+rSi3��� .. a <.".3.C+e��a�.l:S- '�.�I�.ef' "'. _ '.r. `:�,. • . o a as R g m W w W m w q_ R h w it 1$ t ju HIS. a •� � Sfs ! Z w3$ _ iY �A LU � ` �3 •R '� Y j D. Z.i �. L i g O C A 9 Y2 �� �w ir—a` =a' =" J. a9 '$ N Z :ips gggO c� S$ o ° S�a p. �g .4 _.D �'qqq .c �$ G7pp W$ •w. NS CAjE O 9 W H, N< m a b N I 7 N q W O W W Bop O O Pj M M ww K m b N N M N M o G e € . s s = -was a o. Ira m 0 11 0 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITi' OF � RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENT TO CONDITi 'AL USE PERMIT NO. 78 -03 FOR AN EXISTING BAR /RESTAURANT, SAM'S PLACE, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 19TH AND CARNELIAN STREETS IN THE !'EIGHBOREOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND MiKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201 - 811 -56, 58, 59, AND 60. A. Recitals. (i) Sam's Place, Luanne R. Pellegrino, has filed an application for the amendment to Conditional Use Permit No. 78 -03 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Permit request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 22nd day of August 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued said hearing to September 12, 1990. (iii) On September 12, 1990, the Planning Commission concluded said hearing. (iv) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is herF�-y found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearings on August 22 and September 12, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follow;: (a) The application applies to property located at the northwest corner of 19th Street and Carnelian with a street frontage of 1,037 feet and lot depth of 240 feet and is presently improved with a shopping center; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is a fut :;re freeway, the property to the south is an existing shopping center, the property to the east is an existing shopping center, and the property to the west is existing single family residences. -/2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. AMENDMENT TO CUP 7803 SAM'S PLACE -September 12, 1990 Page 2 (c) The proposed_ amendment contemplates extending the hours.kvf operation to coincide with those established by the x.pplicant's alcoholic bef!rage control license, that is fron the current closing hour of 11 p.m. to a new closing hour of 2 a.m, seven days a w{_ek. (d) The current limitation on hours of operation to 11 p.m. was established as a direct result of a history of public safety and public nuisance problems associated with the former tenant, the Boar's siead. (e) The former problems have not occurred - since the curtailment of the hours to 11 p.m. and ;.he elimination of related entertainment. (f) The Sheriff''s Department records indicate no calls for service at this address under the current tenant, Sam's Place, since they opened for business. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- re'erenced public hearings and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accorh With the Generic Plan, . the objectives of the Development. Code, and the purposes of the district in which the sitc- is lecated. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or we *fare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. based upon the findings and conclusions set f - -th in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subjer* to each and every condition set forth beow: Planning Division 1) The hours of operation for the bar and restaurant shall be between 11 a.m. to 12 p.m. (mid'night) Sunday through Thursday and between 11 a.m. to 2 a.m. Friday and Saturday. 2) This approval is granted subject to a full food menu being offered during all nti!siness hours. 3) Extension of hours of operation is granted for a six -month p;riod„ unless extended by the Planning Commi sign. .1-13 f a_ �4 C ME 6 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. AMENDMENT TO CUP 78 -03 - SAM'S PLACE September 12, 1990 Page 3 4) ' Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code and all other applicable City Ordinances. 5) If the operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon the surrounding residents, adjacent businesses and teiants, including but riot limited to, noise, loitering, or disturbances, the Conditional Usc- Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission frr the consideration and possible termination of use. 5. The Secretary to this Commisfion shall certify tc,the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1990. PLANNING COMMISS11IN OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNie , Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary It Brad Buller, Secretary or the Plannir2 Commission of the Citt of Rancho: Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held' on the 12th day of September 19.90, by the following Mote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS,, NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 4. Dp; } PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 90 -05 - JETER DEVELOP14FNT AND CONSTRUCTION SEPTEMBER 12, 1990 Page 2 E. Parking Calculations Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage - Ratio Required Provided Office /Admin. 1:,167 1/250 _ 57 - 226 Total '7 226 II. ANALYSIS• A. General: This review is For environmental clew -ance only. - Foll"''3wing the issuance L- a Negative Declaration:, the City Plannar would grant , al.,7oval subject to the conditions reco<nnended by the review Committees. The applicant is requesting approval for new construction of a Department of Motor Vehicles office building totaling 14,167 square feet. The exterior of the building will be, treated with a smooth stucco treatment. The base wilt. consist of split face block and painted metal flr4hing details. All primary visitor entrances include an articulated enlarged entry structure with rounded corners. These rounded corners will also be carried through on all parapet walls. A carport, which serves as a starting /stopping destination for all Oriving tests, will be attached to the building on the east side, out of public view from the public F Ereets and away from ` the main circulation areas for the site. The employee plaza /lunch area, which is located the northeast corner of the building, incorporates an overhaad wood trellis structure with ornamental metal. The side walls of the lunch area consist of the same split: face block that is _ used on the base portion of the building. One access point on each street frontage is provide. ""or the project to allow sufficient circulation through the site 'r B. Design Review Committee: On July 5, 1990, the Committee Chitiea, Tolstoy, Rroutii) reviewed the project and recommended revisions. The following issues were discussed: 1. Roof line heights should provide a smooth. transition between the main building and the `building entrance f elements. 2. The curved architectural projections ever the windows -should includs a base element to give a more substantial and finis._:d appearance. f , O PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPnRT OR 90 -05 - METER DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION SEPTEMBER 12, 1990 Page 3 1 3. The apparent thickness and mass of the enlarged entry structures shoulS be reduced to become visually consistent and ';ntegrated wits, the primary building. 4. All areas of vision and spandrel glass should be split into equal sections to match the mullions scheme on the prima.y storefront entrances. 5. The secondary visitor entrance facing Hellman Avenue should be redesipEid to center the door within the storefront. 6. Thicker wood beams should be utilized on.the wood trellis structure for increased durability. 7. Split face block samples of a lighter color should be explored for use cn the base of the building and for the required retaining wall along Hellman Avenue. S. The 9th street entrance should be _straightened out to increase visibility and reduce on -site accident potential.` 9. Additional specimen size trees ° (24 -inch box or larger) should be provided 'near the main building entrances in order to enhance the "focal point" of the structure. The Design Review Committee (Ch tiea, Toistoy, Krovtil) reviewed the revised plans at its Auqust 2, 1990, mee ?ing and recoamended zporoval subject to the following conditions; 1. All expanded roof line'elezients should be continued back approximately 14 feet (the length of the existing overhanging roof elements) to give the building a more finished appearance. 2. The pilasters underneath the curved architectuval elements should pop -out a minimum of 8 inches from the building to give increased- depth to all recessed windows. Subsequently, the sidewalks along the south and west sides of the building, from the secondary public entrance to the southeast-corner of the building, should pop -out to become adjacent to the parking spaces in front of window features and at key pedestrian points of entry to the sidewalk system. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 90 -05 - JETER DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION SEPTEMBER 22, 2990 Page 4 3. The lighter split face block sample should bz applied as to effectively hide the vertical elements or the clack and accentuate the horizontal element, both o>> the building base and the flood wail. t 4. Vines should be provided on the interior (project) side of the Hellman Avenue f.00d wall,: to go over and soften the appearance of the wall. 5. Thicker w ,)od beams should utilized on the wood trellis structure above the employee lunch area. 6. The 9th Street entrance should be completely straight, parallel to the east property line. 7. The area of interlocking pavers should be extended back an additional 12 feet on both driveway entrances. 8. Additional specimen size trees (24 -inch box or larger) should be provided near the main building entrances to enhance the focal points of the structure, C. Technical Review Committee: On July 3, 1990, the Commit';ee l ASk 1 reviewed the protect and determined that, With the recommended Standard Conditions of Approval, the project is consistent with all applicable standards and ordinances. The Grading Committee conceptually approved the project at its meeting on July 2, 1990. However, the project has passed the Technical Review and Grading Committees, pending approval of the Drainage Study by the Engineering division. The Drainage Study for the site indicated that additional rood protection will be required to protect the Site from a 100- year flood. Currently, the Engineering Division hss accepted in concept that the site could be adequately protected if the proposed flood wall along the north property line can be continuer) to the east and angled from northeast to southwest to deflect the flow or water back to Hellman Avenue. 0. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by t e applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Checilist and found no significant adverse environmental impacts as a result of this proje!;t. If the Commission concurs with staff findings, then issuance of a Negative Declaration would be in order. III. FACTS. FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the General Plan and Industrial Area Specific, Plan. The project. will not be detrimental to public health or safety, or cause nuisances or 1-4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 90 -05 - JETER DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION SEPT 48ER 12, 1990 Pt Ask v significant adverse environmental impacts. In addition, the . proposed use and site plan, together with the recommended - Conditions of Approval, are in compliance with the ,applicable provisions of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and City standards, I0. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration for DR 90 -05. Res Tu y submitted, Brad ,er' City Planner l i BB :SH :mlg I Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map j Exhibit "B" - Site and Master Plan',. Exhibit "C" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "D" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "E" - W iding Elevations Exhibit "P" - _Floor, Plan I t r i 0 0 ,X ! @ Lr e- � I,� fir Liczqj e- — IT, i SY OF LTCANIONC�A rrEM: of? qu -DS' TffL.E: I N PLA,NIP ION EMBT r A °` SCALE: � WE U7UZAiM MAP M4nr�rr �sursssr. rraarar Oarw�rOM raw asrvrrr rederi rs�sraiarrwrrre!r�rrw - rrssar�re weme errs sa.w;awwr rata. riw�r weaaaa�wrl raaawar.• LEGEND ____•irr.raer.or Orrr. IarYde b!1 emu. rrs a :ran rnr party 0, wcas 7plWwY�r�leal r.er erTC l/tt rm Ylarli�Ylf6r tour e+ia L _ w ra® et+rar rtrorldo" 4caefstr hero® rraw cwamo Carer IN eft I fir Liczqj e- — IT, i SY OF LTCANIONC�A rrEM: of? qu -DS' TffL.E: I N PLA,NIP ION EMBT r A °` SCALE: � 0 i! a{ fit e WNAGE 101w, Ile— n 0 0 0 0 o m rmm: ng FA SM A bULD fJO MTA ra.. yaw rises r+�ri w�u Ym1 pWUKN NOYN� fY1N A� � ' RKdltlO YarN�bs. 4i4b� gW�i1,• J/+K �IrMu ns�s WKC1 P1PN �Kw11 !N "w ' M 1N� �bYO Y1YN N51 � M�{t01r •�KINW ��YI Y ,YIKi4�IB� r.. � e CI1Y QF tJCAMI�IY i TnU: Sriti And IV-A, i PIeAItfI., I®1 EXHMrr- j31' SCALE:' -- U° j ar El -�lo•� vtii' -� ,� :4 w +�•. �L L t li ......dam, _ - ►{; 72 co OF •� UCANiONGh FF�ANr, ION TTY'Y.E: C�kQ t i =t a EQQX��fiMrr -. SiCAL : -� i TIL l t,j t 47-! 3. _ C. ILI 1 t :� ♦_ [ '[' / / ; i � fin/ a • 3 �t ITEM: CITY of UCAMI NGA PL.ANM ON I A i ' T r��� s;Yk r,. w r $ A i ' T r��� s;Yk r,. i ti Aga wr.m.er Nxr rrrlq,�r .o -` c�1IY1,Yw.INnw -, r..rrtr yrY.a.IN rlr.wwn .,Mr•nl,saa,,.anl— lNw�twlr —� \ l'1�` r'1 �� EmpbsN \un� 5Qf Entry �vr.erN. Wp, Entry tN{anA{ �....I..r.arn.r.. WEST ELEVATION wa.., .... HWhmAve" urM.� Ind tIw1NMw M.prr. Nr.I I,.�,y II..IM v. I,.r�t+rs -�� !r/ wrr•nt...rar ,,�.�:.. 01 mNei' 1O1N -+ .r1.r,n LI,I�im�lr MtN,r. �,�� �flN1MI (Irr VYNYIxj�<Y(4wt>N NORTH ELEVATFON [Iw,r.W,wrrr�n., J' ttwrrw.t Wh f/rry t6pe,91 w.rT r.1Y,r,r.rrwl.rN Crpat .runt Mwm+r .rl.ar 1 r.u.tww ..NaMr -• EAST ELEVATION MY OF UCAMONGA PLAN4n ON ! srr ?E :�„ scALE: f 91t�im r fP,:v.,5 Act ,- I v- j. FLOOR PLAN ss Q rrEM:--ne 5,0 CID OF UCAMONGA lTrLE: p PIANI�?l ION AN SCALE: ExHmrr- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 12, 1990 TO: Chairman and f'embers of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad BuliLr, City Planner BY: Jerry Guarraciao, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14548 - EATSCHECK /HACKBARTH - A residential subdivision and Design Review to convert 328 apartment units to condominiums on 29.51 acres of land in the Lowy- Medium (4 -8 dwelling unit per acre) and Medium (8 -14 dwelling units per, acre) zore of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the northeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Highway - APN: 229 - 041 -11. (Continued frm3 Augsst 22, 1990 meeting.) I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of Subdivision Map, Site Plan, garage elevations, and issuance of a Negative Declaration for the conversion of 328 apartment _-nits to condominiums. B. Project Density: 11.12 dwelling units per atine. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single Family Residential; Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) South - Vacant; Industrial Specific Plan Subarea & (_?neral Industrial) East - Edison Easement & Vacant; Open Space & Low- Medium _ Residential (4 -8 dwelling unitp, per acre) Nest - Vacant; Industrial Specific Flan Subarea 8 (General Industrial) D. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Low - radium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) on the north, Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre on the south. North - Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) South - General Industrial irast - Flood Control /Utility Corridor & Low- Medium. Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) West - General Industrial ITEM C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPOti EA & T[ 14548 - PATSCH CK /HACKBARTH Seplember 12, 1490 Page 2 is E. Site Characteristics: The site presently developed as an apartment com,M consisting of 8 -plex and 12 -plex buildings The arranged around a large meandering central open space. 328 units are a mix of 80 one - bedroom, 160 two- bedroom, and 88 three - bedroom units. The smaller 8 -plex buildings are located on the northerly portion of the site designated as Low - Medium Iesidential to provide transition of density from the adjacent single - family tract to the north. Access to the site is provided via a main entrance from Etiwands Avenue with secondary access provided from Arrow and the project is completely Route. Both entrances are gated enclosed by a combination of masonry walls and wrought iron Fencing. Project amenities include two recreational buildings two (;;,hiding kitchens, meeting rooms, and weight rooms), pools, two spas, sand volleyball court, basketball court, tetherball court, and two tot lots. The units, which were completed in November of 1988, feature security Systems with a panic button, washer /dryer hookups: - ^entrap air conditioning, and satellite television hookups. `lhe utilities, with the exception of water,. are all individually metered. Also, each unit has a private eneiosed balcony or patio. F. Parking Calculations: Number Parking Spaces Spaces Of UnitE Ratio Required Provided 80 - One Bedroom 1.5 /unit 120 120 160 - Two Bedroom 1.8 /unit 288 288 176 88 - Three Bedroom 2.01unit 176 Guests .25 /unit 82 $2 TOTAL E116 ' 666 Uncovered parking 250 2150 Covered parking (carports) 208 208 Enclosed parking (garages) 208 208 TOTAL 666 666 II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is proposing to Convert an existing 328 unit apartment project to condo-winiums. Associated with the condominium conversion is the addition of 35 tiett parking spaces. The existiag parking areas will be upgraded through the construction Of additional carport and garage structures to provide a total of 23v uncovered parking spaces, 208 c4r orb spaces, and 208 garage spaces, which ;s consistent IA 9 current Development Code Stan ands, C —Z PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EA & TT 14548 PATSCHECKIHACKBARTH September 12, 1990 Page 3 The project, which was completed only one and a half years agog is in substantial conformance with the Developm"t Standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Development Code with regards to setbacks, open space, density, and design guidel fines. B. implemental Information; Section 17.2 .030 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal r.,-4a requires, "n addition, *,o the i.formation required by the Subdivision Map Act and TitlE ifi, that supplemental information be submitted with a Tentative Tract Map for the purpose of conversion." The applicant has supplied this information (see Exhibit "H") which inc'udes: Building W Atory Report, an estimate of the useful life of the physical - _,-menns of the project, an evaluation of interior noise reduction techniques used during construction, a standard structural pest control report, and a' proposed program to assist present occupants to purchase their units or relocate. This i3fot'mation has been reviewed and 10und to be in substar1:ial conformance with the applicable development codes and specific plan requirements. Additionally, the applicant has supplied a copy ;af the draft budget submitted to the Department of Real Estate showing the enticipated monthly association dues and a copy of the Covenants. Conditions, are' 'testrictions. These items will be reviewea by the Department of Real Estate and the City Attorney through the normal subdivision process. C. Trails: The project was originally conditioned by the Planning Division to provide a pedestrian greenway along the northern project boundary connecting the public sidewalk on Etiwanda Avenue to the future Etiwanda Creek Regional Trail. This greenway has been provided, however, the landscaping and irrigation improvements have not been properly maintained. Tnis was due to a misunderstanding an the pact of the applicant regarding who was responsible for the mair.tertance of this greenway. The Engineering Division is not agr�.tnble to the acceptance of this greenway into a landscape/maintenance district and proposes that it be 'maintained by the property ownert(tumeowoer'S association. Currently this greenway is fenced off from the project site by a wrought iron fence, however, the Design Review Committee has recommrrded the insialiation of gates to allow "Oedestrian access from the project site to the greenway as will ae discussed later. D. Design Review Committee: The Committee -,inberger, McNiel, Coleman ) reviewed the proposed project or_ epril 19, 1990, and recommended approval subject to the following conditions. 1. Provide two gated means of access to the greenway north of the proposed project and install connecting concrete walkways. KINNING COMMISSION STAFF REPOP, "f EA & TT 14548 - PATSChECI' /HACKBARTH Septa ,,o:er 12, 1990 Page 4 2. Provide a capstone on all new retaining walls. 3. Increase the amount of fish -scale cedar shake on the rear of the proposed garages 4. The underside of all existing and proposed carports are to be painted. I E_ En9ineerinQ Comments: The City transportation model indicates that substantial widening will be required at the Arrow Roy +te /Etiwanda Avenue tersection at some time in the future. The developers' engineers prepared two designs for the intersection. One requires moving the curb on the north side of Arrow Route 14 feet northerly (Option #1, Exhibit "E ") The second design would do all of the widening on the south side of Arrow Route (Option 02, Exhibit "F "). Staff felt it was unreasonable to rcluire the additional widening at this time by this project (essentially a change of ownership), because the original apartment project constructed the existing improvements within the last couple of years. However; to keep all options open, the conditions require that the project dedicate sufficient street right -of -•way so that widening can be done on the north side of Ar.,ow Route if it is decided that it's the best course of action in the future. The impact of the widening of this project is shown on -xhibit "G." the curb would be as close as 18 feet to one of the buildings, Also, it is noted that a less significant widenin of 3 feet will be required on Etiwanda Avenue in the future. F. Environmental Assessment: Pzrt I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmenlal Checklist and has found no significant impact on the environment as a result of this project. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The proposed use and site plane together with the conditions of - approval, will not be detrimental to the public health or safety, or cause a nuisance or significant environmental impacts. ?n addition, the proposal promote, the health, safety, and welfare of the residents of the City. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in The Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper as a public hearing, the property has been posted, and notices were sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site as well as to eazh of the affected apartment units. In addition, a copy of the Staff Report has been served on the subdivider and on each tenant of the subject property at least three days prior to the public .hearing. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EA & TT 14548 - PATSCHECKRACKBARTH September 12, 1990 Page 5 V. RECOMMENDATION- Staff recommends that the Plannirg Commission approve Tentative Tract Map,, 14548 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions and issu,ence,of a ` Negative Declaration. es t 11V s i ed, Bra er + City P nner BB:dG /jfs , Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Lucati;,n Map Exhibit "B" - Tentative Tract Map' E:hlbit "C" - Site Plan Exhibit "Oa - Landscape Plan Exhibit „E." - Street Improvements Option 01 Exhibit "F - Street Improvements Option f2 Exhibit "G" - Street Dedication Exhibit "H" - Supplemental Information (Pest Control Report, Noise Reduction Techniques, Structural Elements Report, Building History Report, Renter Assistance Program) Exhibit "I" - Garage Elevations li Exhibit_ "J" - Resolution No. 85 -56 Resolution of Approval with Conditions p k e r Alm !fit uin S: '.;tF CD z b � y)L i y O 6 D I 1-73v I m co Z m. C m --q m r ;u O > ;O N j o 4h, m 7 v to iv w K• ITEM: IHS`i' 1TY OF I TCF3[C SWCAMONGA. TrrLE: m!aR N PLANNINI OWPION EXHIBIT :*A " SCALE: i iS lip In LIJ CL t- Z lZ 9 it 1, a tt�?'� - .1 M1.,,• � t �C r- 'd . � VI n.�* eel' V JN i ; ti os C ^7 � 1 „�,,tm{, 1 1 q IhF W dam- ,} �� ;I! �� '1 `�f i� I { +�'!� +I f{ " i►�li —.7 . ; ill"'I R11 -11 Jill i4ll f s . l_Zan g lit Wil M, '- k�) ajr fil a Ia l F W [01 7° LI ajr fil a Ia l F W [01 7° z U) co < '� * ��( � � ! �� i = s: a 1� 'p� ^— � p�' — ��. h lit i� i .t ... 1' : E•°— i ld.! z � ` EA � O � ;.lid I r 0 re 4J f- *20, j_ .e _ � > � ' °vim• • a � • _ . o .ice _-^ : a ell zk 1 V_ � I` ` . A � .i ®IL ar r' !' r$•, +� , � .rte �i�+ „o- i � � -p 0 a co Z it mCL AM Z � �— —.1. c m i � •1 �i; I' It jf i tl I � 6,1,: �- ( 11 W W j,.. l�ltll �Itl (it it(III S,!Ie! t MiII. ( t ,jtilti,�t'� lll!!N { ! 1. ' „1j , I ��6 C i '_ F j t i • cE § F if Ld .� W 1 101! 1:_ I �t >:i t,: �• s:� `F `F � 6 + E � f�r IN - .7I' II DIY• �" �.; - �Lr +. .,�ry �• .. _.'i:�• c. I C =1b y 4 , 1 x` tit poll joys-- t 70" rC S1. — V :o J G— l l y � • r "n u ul 3nN3AV . "Ti. f F_ SUN== 5211111" cc cn fl z zz z #c J1 z w b 0J v' QLL F_ SUN== 5211111" IMVZYA 1q. OC. _2 uo 'gel! I a 521 IL a A f :gff Ing 1v il ill fit cc it M.2. it C_/ 21 z cn fl z zz z #c z w 0J v' QLL w CL l0 4 LU CL VGNVM1_L3 oil "t IMVZYA 1q. OC. _2 uo 'gel! I a 521 IL a A f :gff Ing 1v il ill fit cc it M.2. it C_/ 21 O �w m© z w � f!1 W N tl�tl W 2 2 � F L + EnN:3nd EM W ,3, �, 0 > rr a fgs a ¢Z Z to ¢ a a: v y ✓1 a UJ <C v t <C 8 > O° V y � N 1 V(I Ntr M1J_3 0 ig ► lily g tae ;if l i l u C o Z o Hit 'S C -1 I-M El- ki ( ! e Rw � ! ui ± � � R i d " � 4 � � U a � � . ro #Ul ! � !e �� / \ !7 1� R \ � '� { !_ �§ & ■ / E \ 10 [ � � WANDA AVENtir � U CITY .,.a ri-- 5• —T'0 THE 1114.:. ViN'.• PEST C0tFtT FG t. ET P.01 .V:.SEt Oi $DG. NCI. {STREET I {Itt 91730] O1CGiMaiAA GATE Uf IWLCTIW7 `� Di ^v %SaIY _ I 91i. i 4•aPEC:EC �� A CO. CCCE 3h 0II05190 Affix stamp here on Board copy only I VINT TEST =M-WK, RC. 7t4- 8x1 -U9G � A LICENSED PEST CONTROL tft 60T E. FOt M STREET, WA AM, CA 9ZMI OPERATOR IS AN EXPERT TN w HIS FIELD. ANY QUESTIChi r.a:+ RELAYIVE TO THIS REPORT a9cls T aaTraruwo :ylalµ CO. REPORT NO. SWAP NO. o,....w,� SHOULD IIE REFERRED TOY.7M. Impaction Ordered by (Name and Address) Repziri Sent to (Namo and Address) Owner's Nome and Address Noma and Address of a POrty in frterosl_ EIFffEE 2. 9. 8. 7. a. LDIAGRAM AND EXPLANATION Of f bINGS ttw uCar t. um4.fl a u unu. a twtN m rhewn .n dNp.m) i C- ner-,; DescriN;iar ? 3IU7f A4Ymea '1lal eY FlR Ili jLi1PIFiT rJIfFfNIYtrY iMYle Intpccuon Tay Potted (location) STrtane AW4 Or- In;yeC :anTal. ME IA131 (A) SAWLT) KUSRIRD ACCESS FAT jKpECiED aE TO CC+:9TI=CN1 ND U11AYi0 91M OF I*WATION. IS) THIS IS A LIMITED IMSPECIION OF FARM !'BEA(S) AT OWLS fii91.EST. (C) RE FOLIAIMO W9 SE'i£i )W IHSoLMi -B k C li"TRIT h7TEt IV AY1: CF TIE FIRST PAGE OF M l)SPECTION FUM Sr:ITES APE Ol.SW(IEE M ION JE". W0ITI01S M UNITATICN . TI., IS TO CERTIFY TWIT THE Ai)JS PRCPE M WS IVECTED CN T E AM D41E IN ACC, Xa 9ITH TIE STRtGft FIST CONTACT, ACT W MM A!D 0— LATICES WTED PJWW -,MM, No THAT.HQ EVII£IO OF ACi:iw` I)FEt+iAilQ( OR I)fECTIC{1 NAS FO tA, AEFECTIC" FEEL 10.09 el`r:ii tt Ii!r rl pSl 11` <Tir% t � f I , r t �Y msa,eteo ot• PRICE, TOM (eggs r, n Licenscno.�_stcn /ayrd'_Y.f.�: JrP l4 His An EMniLED TO O /TAW COPES OF ALL NEWS AND COMPLE119M MM CIS OR TIS PMMEtYT FI(ED'YtTlt YNE. IOAAO WpMC THE 1lIEb(OWO TNO YEARS 7i+il1 PAt &(nT M A LE.CD fG.P.CM fCE TO. STAUCTUM1AL PEST C001M1OL 10AA0,. :IOO ItOYtE AYE. SACAAYEMIO. CA, /Slit ITEM TT- I ggt28 OP RANCH 0, 'OUCAMONGA PLAN1NNG- B SION EXH Brr-. W,/ scAI.E :. � t Em O r t t � f I , r t �Y msa,eteo ot• PRICE, TOM (eggs r, n Licenscno.�_stcn /ayrd'_Y.f.�: JrP l4 His An EMniLED TO O /TAW COPES OF ALL NEWS AND COMPLE119M MM CIS OR TIS PMMEtYT FI(ED'YtTlt YNE. IOAAO WpMC THE 1lIEb(OWO TNO YEARS 7i+il1 PAt &(nT M A LE.CD fG.P.CM fCE TO. STAUCTUM1AL PEST C001M1OL 10AA0,. :IOO ItOYtE AYE. SACAAYEMIO. CA, /Slit ITEM TT- I ggt28 OP RANCH 0, 'OUCAMONGA PLAN1NNG- B SION EXH Brr-. W,/ scAI.E :. � t Em O i (ARCHITECTS, IN( January 23, 1990 Planning Department. City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Victoria Woods - 325 Unit Apartment Project .'.crow Highway at Etiwanda Avenue. Dear Gentlemen Per the request of Mr. Ray Patscheck, 1 have reviewed the construction draw- ings for the subject property. The interior noise reduction between units was achieved via the use of a double 3 -1/2" stud wall separated by a 1" air space. Both stud walls were insulated with 3 -1/2" of fiberglass Batt insulation. Th -s assembly was tested by the Gypsum Associates and found to have an STC rating of 55 -59 (refer to NGG 2377). The p: jects floor'cniling assembly has the S2: rating of FO-54 as documented by sound test KAL L 224- 28 -65. The assembly consists of 3/4" gyperete over 5/8" plywood over 2 x joists with ls,'B" gyp board mouthed on reailie+nt furring channels. A layer of R -11 fiberglass batt was inu *:-- 'ad in the cavi%y. These materials and installation procedures are consistent wi, the 1985 UBC requirements. This eeterminativn ras made upon my review of the permitted construction . drawings prepa.-ea by this office and my field observations during construc- tion. _ if you have "ny questions, please give me a call. bD.n, An Jord an -Valli Architects, Inc. BDJ /kv ,.• 3f CITY OF W-, TCHPi -- UCArdiONGA PLANMRdx l'►.ION ITEM:Tt LA y b TME:TT o,c MTvY.Te+aJ-S N EXHIBIT: "�A %' zSCALE: ---- VEIGA 11 CONSTRUCTION CORP. January 8, 1990 Mr. Raymond R. Patscheck ^a scheck /Hackbarth 640 N. Tustin #103 Santa Ana, CA 92705 RE: Investigation of useful life of Elements at victoria Woods Dear Mr. Patscheck: The following is a summary of our findir.�:_ regarding the ! expected useful lif, of various elements at your apartment project. Be advised that variations in maintenance programs, weather conditions and other acts. of Gad can materially affe:at this timeta:ile. Utility d livery systems 30 years On site sewers & water 30 years Foundaticss, slabs & exterior walls 25 years Landscaping sprinkler: 20 years � Stres°` and driveway paving 20 years i Electrical system 20 years Al a'= system 20 rears Heating and air conditionin7 18 years Roofing - comp. shingle 17 years Roofing - built,-up 12 yearn Swimming pools spas 15 years Exterior paint - years Thank you for the opportunity to be of service. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. very truly yours, TIiT.E: U tut'u oa Fred St's. -iga EXHmrr:' �J `� SCALE; veiga construction CA 'ontractor Lic, #264967 f CITY OF E'! ,S UCAMONGA aNI V MSION 640 IUSTiri- SU' "E'O5- SAWA ANA, C 4 ii.22.fi3d A lication information. S H. 3. Building History Report: A. A builOing rermit was taken put January, 1987 and 328 units, carports, plus 2 recreation buildings were completed November, 1988. B. Since completion of construction, a mar:kf °ting nrcciram has been initiated to rent the apartments, resulting in approximately sE-7% occupancy to date. C. There have been no major repairs required or performed since completion. b3 The land and improvements are owned in fee by Patscheak /Hacknarth•, a general ,pa-:-tn2rship. r r f 7 E iC?N TTMEzk ;t�tnr lti, i7 , y EXHIBIT; `' 1 � •AcALP.: --- �' PATSCHECK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 640 N T6sttnAve S09103 Santa, 4nm-Colif.•927fw i � 5WI4 WI August" 30, .198rs Mr. Jerry Guarzacino Rancho Cucamonga Planning Dept. P.C. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: victoria woods Concaminium conversion Dear Jerry: Outlined below is our proposed program to assist present occupants at Victoria Woods in purchasing '-,heir unit or j alternatively to assist in their relocatic;t. { 1. Apply $100 per mouth .of rent paid up to a maximum of $2,000 toward tenant's down payment.. 2. Give an allove nce toward •i�urchaie• price in •,14L(=U of renovation cost of tenant's unit. 3. Notify tenants at the time of.lease that spar.'tmerts are condominiums and may be subject to sale. 4. provide a moving allowance of $250 to tenant - :if• -•he elects not to buy. Because our sales plan is to operate the project iz'il°its current rental status for at least a year, .we.may; want ':to , amand or add to the items outlined depen3ingr on• market r_onditsi.bns :.apt the time. Please feel free to call me if you have any suggestions or questions. _ Very truly ours, ,,a:o'i2aymo2, •R. a scheck TEM:,_„ MY OF ,, UCAM ONGA TITLE: a �- tcn � IC4.T,gn N P tTi` - " EtSION EXHIBIT:" : " tip\ 'SCALE: i I rDF'Ej771j f# -zo i T v W j I ti a o a. U. F l � 1 } 1( rll�l tl ❑I • 1 ' 1 uuu 1 ! m i 1 n 1 , �j l Y 1 � e >i -i UI! s e —zr z .a U F F � o RESOLUTION NO. 85-56 - j A RFSOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVINta DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 84 -12 LOCATED ON THE w NORTHEAST CORNER OF ETIWANuA AND ARROW IN THE LOW- MEDIUM AND MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS WHEREAS, on the 24th day of September, 1984, a complete application was filed by William G. Davis for review of the above - described project.; and WHEREAT -, on thn 24th day of April, 1985, the Rancho Cucamonga °fanning Commission held a meeting to consider~ the above- described project. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has rene-ired a noise study and the project has been revised to mitigate noise impacts. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following can'te meta 1. That the proposed project is cons-:stent with the objectives of the General Plan; and 2. That the proposed usa is in accord with the objective of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance wild each of the applicable provisions of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and 4. That tree proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the - vicinity. SECTION 2 That although this project will c=_ate adverse impacts on the env ronmentg mitigation measures are included in the project deign or required as conditions of approval that reduce ir,pacts to a non- significant level, and that a Negativa Declaration is issued on April 24, 1985. SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 84 -12 vs approved subject to the following conditions and rttached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION: 1. Final landscape palette shall identify smatter sub- - +eighborhoods within the pro.;ect using inc`ividual tree varieties. i Resolution No. 1 DR84 -12 - Davis Page 2 2. A continuous on -site greenway shall be provided to connect the Et wanda Creek public sidewalk on @tiwanda Avenue with regional, traii and shall he dedicated as ar, easement and designed per the requirements of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 3. Any fencira provided at the terminus of Morten Avenue, Emmett Avenue. aid Cornwall Avenue shall be 'view fencing such as wrought -iron to ^event a "walled" efeQ,:.` 4. Provide extensive landscaping treatment at project entrances and - ts'-ween- carport parking areas and drive aisles. Decorative walls and planters shall be provided at project entrances consistent witn app -oved plans. 5. Trash enclosures shall be provided with lattice -type overhead shade structures and mail boxes shall be provided with solid overhead structures compatible vith the Victorian architectura' theme. 6. A continuous sidewalk system shall be provided, wherever possible, that provides an intercon►iecting linkage throughout the project. In particular, a sidewalk shall be provided around the edge of the large central open space. AIL WN ENGINEERING UIVISYOM: 1. Modified cul -de -sacs shall be provided within the project at the southern termini of Marton, Emmett and Cornwall Avenues. Right -of -way for same shall b . e dedicateC to the sati,fac: ion -of the City Engineer. 2. The main drive aisles shall be constructed as private streets to include Curb and gutter (28' minimum curb separation), AC payment, and stree`: lights. Sidewalks shall be provided on one side or an alternate approved sidewilk plan approvod. 3. The proposed storm drain system to serve the rorth,erly sul -de -sac shall be designed for a 100 year stom Plus I,. emergency overflow. casements shall be provided to the ultimate outlet facility. 4. I All drainage facilities outleting into Eeiwanda Creek shall be subject to approval and a peraIit from the San gerna:dimo County Flood Control District. 5„ A structural block wall and slope paving shT.l be provided along the easterly boundary of the site subject to the recommendations of the San Bernardino County Flood Control District and the approval of the City Engineer. f �i Resolution No, DR84 -12 Davis Page 3 Y 6. Construct portion of the Etiwanda Area Mater Plan Storm Crain Line 'within Arrow Route from Etiwanda Avenue to Etiwanda Creek. Also outlet velocity protection measures will be r'.equired within the charnel. This condition replaces the previous requirement for an ons to retention basin. BUILDING b SAFETY__DIVISION: 1. Conceptual grading plan approved subJect to the following; a. Acceptable method of draining from streets to basin. b. Permission to drain north cul -dc -sacs to Flood Control District Channel, and positive 100 year overflow backup system. c, Northeely and southerly property lice wall be flood wall to required limits of 100 year overflow from Etiwanda Creek. d. Entire easterly property 11ne wall to be flood wall. e. Conformance with the revisF-4 site plan which indicates a u foot high landscape berm. 2. Tht 6 foot landscape bem along the Arrow and Etiwanda frontages shall be contoured to provide an _ undulating appearan`e 3. Supplemental acoustical analysis shall be prepared for all buildings within 400 feet of Arrow or Etiwanda to indicate m tiyation measures to Uhieve 45 CNEL maximum. Construction plans shall conform to the recommendations of said report. Additional noise level measurements shall be taken if the Aneron plant operation Fjas; come; aced operations at the southwest corner ai Arra -4 and Etiwanda. Resolution No.' a DR84 -12 Davis Page 4 ti APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24th DAY OF APRIL, 1985. PLANK OMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CJCAMONGA 8Y: 7"" Dennis ut, airman ATTEST: Ri k G me eputy Secretary I, Ric Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the 'ity Of Ranchc Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was du' and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission 0"'the Rancho April, 1985,rbyuthe followingfvote- to -witng Commission held AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, BARKER, MCNIEL STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NuNE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: SSI ONERS: CHITIEA is • i j'. f { y 2 O i 2 o s v O. u � g uq ory J N i � $a°LOU�y.L n m Y O r A' Na L^ C O W G y .9 .. .C.... . c —uMa q W �3@yi. �ao EO r zoa �� L g N O�y.'OiC CC^ nC ypL Wy L Y O WQOCd O. L 6 a9N O E a A" G •/ Lnt a» rGN O m O V — OGE G 22U =4 � C �o dAUN u OU C ^Ong �m O V U« �6N ^° t o i Aq� ._ C.2 o. Ci G tO w. gyp- OV p a yt Y E iC @L,6 67 O 4 j L G E C O Y yg «L U O QL� Q P W C 05i-26 26 O p'+� U G 6 U 4'L. u0i n O +r�7�', Od�U C W C U E Y^ N V 9V�L O r 7« y 5 p.15 I ~.j —WV Np�.+Orq• 0. J G n6 Y=ew^. t. «6L Oey< ViV =kUl •im4 �U�p. 4 y .l yOS "=u CO6 C�`aN O �y O 00.6 G >3 y O TI t�KWC� m V 9 CU qsu V aN C N. • oC'C ^qJ m T O CJL ma O A g am O� . •,;. 0 � qi �6 d C ps ^W mya�i N Q:: C gyS nsaw S' W' = uv 61.2% pC'°'^� ^� Q�.G�L L ai m.A•�, O >s °qi gyn�e.t ,'uN eag�piw.. LOCy q=L°gSik NOY. ^�Ui TJ� GOT`.Z Cpd O p�p�p�Oeee Moo 0 -0 O >YY.VO. V' 4 M'CAU M.Nw �Ey O o .O . W mA G • .� IDiv dC LS.�` -E OG�O`.0 yYnNC C U „ ^YOIY yy _ pp N.W�L VY C Ly —i O.UX.MYA w s�uSCe sN°w ��m°QN r 6YMWNa YC = EysegiiiGV n GRwj L p'CO« DL/ Uy I d 2 O i 2 o s v O. u � g uq ory J N i � Y • O .9 .. .C.... . 22U =4 � C �o ya L ISPYYYOL. .g$,t � >O �_ w �Y q`u4N iN m rV.M $��r �.P«W OYq° s Q Mii Z �. C INi . ^yd P .. « �. V n � rV N' . GAD C P� t . L O zMy ^d`d Yn ay . n EJW YP C AML N L V • OV G N 22 {1 4 9 LO X C ° L CQp V y'LP� T r V 1 II �: A d N E ♦�V\ `• °CE {I LNe 2. mr E rOy OG. O eLn y �M ZOVO c��C t O°jr Fy Cl may. r•+ A _L 6p �N 1 O P as YtbGLMO� -N T+ �°N•� c f p O d Y V e Zs r \W ` �X`gN G L .i GL ^uc Cw Y 'v' N: ten` ^ S f C Nu �. °pa N>. �'y u°Le v`^'c�X= q1 •- .- w"N My�b 2L o O `OC ^o *' zm �O.a.G. °�7 d.Yit UV C�OOL� +•y�pp XO p PG, °N.O FZ .O.CV"Z p�C fe ^E �Y]sd a0 °C Z FC yNa a {YC�CO .c °Ly C L p N r y�+^ p !1 T O V 9WyC1�0. Y^ 'fU/ Y Q Y^ .O P !Y f I °}^V.�p. �O�M p G+ O 6 0 i�61/i9C EcE � ^ � Y. G 8 =1 I Id N.y.O N ^urML 7G Y ^ N t p� V « 9 ^OSf.Q`J E - OM U. °OCg .f=t i;Yp+ OVY.p^ VYp V Las V2! .L y {I Y•.°iW C IR. t•6� :c °Gr°u. cNU�. -N VU. G p @ `AbL LP L�� .��N. v�EY Y-{.. �a...r ;c LR 9MG sLn+�f a� ono. ii •�- tQir Nwa m u ' oe� cM a o i a .PU Ya.. er 2m g .+°° .... �^^ rI� �-'� 0v ` + +v p: •a�ev*�+..• v u�c Y Nr � nnY °l o �Y CYN `.Ya.rY s.•L+ orYwy rcpW Xi ' v p 0 Lo _a: r 6 a V 10 0 NgnO 66 r Y +~ j. V 0 L J L Z". Y^i�i .V Y1L LN dNyC C Y.qC: L,L�O; `Vncy�Gr M f.Q ltya r nY.4Q +.pfa V 4pC� rN ^Y pq °Y Yi rp OY'Cdpp�F�' Ar N�pYM1i Mr p^ YIGVtC ryN CCVpw 4 yA Qr Y%a- NLN H VppL NY.o..0 ° 50-- ^ C P� N plc d r �� N^ w@ X • L� V `t�' a C p` .r C �f r e°' C 'r'c` Lp NLVL NlGO Luc �6 �T°L� �O ^L O 14 Y N C Y 'L G O"s oON ^ ` iyY Nb`Li_V P� Y.G.G^ L.HY �NGrC -I- t rQQq$[�pnn (Y �Y ^XaTC.La�$ L� Y O V N y.S so p.. r 4. NW -Q a g_ u� A � l b. n N� G v° Cz "V- p X Q M.O Y Lu L' K� Y Q a V jYj '0 0 Cp. �ipw . 1 + Lg N•L+acyy. •c �L'+ YOGI$ �V +.r. N.c; 7^ a o:.li -59 SA.0 I O YW V p QY r G r CCq y+ Y rai Grr °p8L< C O X, LLO '"...� G. u�••LON Yr C V = °p --ow, •^4 :att=- v -0NOn par. •. "' �oi^ c`� iCC og «� 0g?g?Yi c «'v �.`•r �.§ e$ �y YYGd ~r�Y NQNN +C C °CN 4" prOY r M X00 cA0 VQ LpL°L O VO. ^e °Z'Q SYAi VG V1��j V01.N.. �. i OI4�Q ° g —■ate v a ppC� € ^� „�o.� a5° :.�1 Lc ^v ^wY■ uo = �o�� ^L p. 'I SpN UL i.�pYy�y..Y ��= =w:, °o .c �,= ao Yo olio Q +GGa 4UOC �Mp �`•L MO® 03 -C u YLw -C t .o.I�90V 0M plw.� Y�cs�4aUN YYAr�O pt.JG yIIjC� .-C pp 'i C-27 C.LL Y.iYf Y.�Y•. OYNyG Cyyp CY CY °rO °A•JVL >jO C YDY .0 �C9YL OI I' D. �V °F COp ^6V OI C CL NA.'Y09 J A7 O yQA� �� ^ ^Y AT pL.�A O•.Y •q�6 6YCC 9 OY•J. _ V. � O V o N• q NY = � Y % Y tq nm •. fY. Y ^w � •JJ ^N.+w .p p°•. M6 N� �01���'!`�U A.a � E LCD � dd.�'y'" — M6NY F• �tgf pp =oA O CYONY �V VapiJ •' OE IQ.. �MYA a: wa.` K Q.• ca. ter° rnpY OY` — qRM q° MM C9�1 e..N Cyt y�a ^�Na Y(�� y {.Y °r g•pl OYL40N�/ YFp N.f L tY � 1 OyN° '�•IC' C Y� • � ° " N'O NN °° Ql.) •Y G ��` C'O 'p N O•'. S N�pN `CN dw 9.•� L� �.n Yw.n �.u°�LA MST✓ ■N .r OWN HU V p r d ° 7 1P D ^9 g ° Y r N^ U yO pd YA N ONY V YN Yp Y CY�JJN° �✓ L VN Y �. 1� L �p Lpp Npp Q.. P C L O O O Cq °•q Ur �Ei N% a.NO N•YL. W1'. plif i�N 0..0� � ~V wNL Aq SO N ~'^IL L�q Wu N.,.A °.0 N'—lLYaiN yNNi. CC l�` /V p9 ON 6TO •J` iQN 0O %VF LYSOYYO SCM.M. ib YYCCU 6 CNl.l On 0 ✓19q YY YgC Q6 °SCCN SN ►y'.YO °Y C m i V , N l 0 C A V ° E p C 9 L L ✓ Y LN �j !" ° L O !Y� N T °� 1l N Y L M M N t •'• M Y N` N� C O � O ■ •{ Y. ! l Y llv�^�y _ Y !J O. C JNi°I Y= °•A (3 C 41p�V. °V LY 1•ID� L `LG a9Y 11 OYNYt 'NN ✓V Y7 YV1'SJ C� T� ~ . y�OO�V ^�C�O <•� ILi.ON6M N- YL N N UrA YI> pINN cn L C N C N t M A aN s`" of I N • \ �. ' 1 YOI a �. ` Ly01Y <r y`C iC Cepp Cp iY Y�• p °A MV A� Y L New O• Q� O•pr YNq +�� 'N�pp iD CN O Ni N YM L Q�4 J•�'r T N�yO. .l�H d Y•1 N�O. p� C MZ {O g•LJ+L. a a CZ {OY,• L� Y AN 'ej O•C LQ�'9 4Jq O N.•r ~4Py� N N O Oj T7 O y a� N •• ° ^M,�� ^•J .•C.p N� 6 =? Y O Y L•YJ� Copp >'�N C.°Y,Y rIL Og�N V °A �Y OI w >!yY � N~ NM N�p •Y. ��J ��' 06�N�0 �•I�Yi• °'pCFL may A`A� � NN. p� Y Y MNrY•L Y ! YpOY +o ° 3 L! eC15 a%e Y In V� NYLC= Y pi� t ^. Yr�O ✓Ah�+Mr EJ° VAYYO Y t p A d0 EM'!� M cG C ub • C.•�Y A °Y OA Y �^ N M + O '• oz,C f ii 6M Y. NCYL Till Y.N Q� ANY O• ►O +C.�� O^'�� Y. �1L Oli Ntl Yq �Y s� �0� >�r �,`✓N6 �YL A�BpLp CN •b �'C iNY111 WPd�N✓rC'' O~_G 8.�`� V ► r >A Ti AA 'p°r ,°„mow. i0 + /)((�(" Ih S CNm M` EME ^ gyp. EEOUG uE Y`� I� "z N�2 'Uye CG�OU '�'cgi:^ w `yyy `u • Y Fv, t Al v ^- In �a u�"^ E uA a v w�°. a•sz� oy c v_ U�~ Yc1V ygY ^C9 GJ �jECN V 4.. u u ZZEN C U� uN O1UyU- Y ONJU =O LL 'J 9rV.O-.Q,M�ti� C. YN• O •Y •N NL •` r C ■ SS Cy y ^ O1L VBOO w UO�a ± N T'e �y0 2 O YGec L LA• vC UY Y�y «d _O ^�. .'. Y^.. � L. uC .,. Y' NS UTC .~.. CNV 3 •N ✓.,�N C6 YML�� o E�gde. V'°'w UC �• ��� �S. S`.. 7E o .u.i ._+ 9��m $ CJ •.°.w ui u Et wYq WVO BYO �YY �CM i ^iy � pq �. C., ao.Y Ce swi Ya 2 LOp b�' C�• 00� pY E ••U{�y V r yy JY� Fri �' p0VZ Y «U 69 U C N Y L DC V N c _> S � Y • N Y � O YCq N ; C 6 au tl �.C. —p= N g uq� p Y p^ ( :1T$G(• y >. o M p L') Nzc— °per —� Y Y Y ULJ o.i nY °yA p�.1 Lv GSi'�ua�Li o: Lei E�y« sNpi ahZ «�� +m i v� Ycc YG.i9 1CC,0� wY'lC` F wl 1. G �,SM Xfil. h. 0ya s r +J4 NS G�1 'j LIVNp C.0 V1 O 4Y. v. P.— Y IH wCCEv YtI 1 •4I O > � V �I � — ^Yg��1 S CNm O S :012 w C �L+oCC C Y c O 01 A a =- C .. a �. I" uN _4C Oa >[ E �,yY ^YA g Y =4N� aL wYq WVO USNC pT , EyY CO yt.!';. 2 LOp b�' C�• 00� pY E ••U{�y V r +V w Fri �' p0VZ Y «U 69 Y L �.8ya —p= p. c Y Y ULJ �iy~ O 25Ow 8F «" s f T -Z ° «« G,VasC�• Nv ` . +° wCCEv Yg.• pQCY WCI pp- ^Yg��1 vV —�'O UN O� Q UCY` �`�N'. �1,. �. �ONw OY H•r MN�C y� dedU °Y� �L •_ ON« w V��1= -S Cp=EO1 T ` g t N i s 0 pppV C' N ► N G d A •) O O w Y el °� ` V Y_= r L. V') 1 OC O Y. ` Y.:D Ov N— G j tNr �Y y C ~ +V Y M a i o C C7� p�•�. pC wS� O � YVC G �CC O C vv CGC LU— S r. `O� a —. 0. w gtlp O=r OY T �� �� °a. �Orp C O o �►6 Yuma_+ M N N C Y9. ^Y y Y Y N y —.P. aY K Yli O C y e_i ~ ►. _ i 6pp pN G. C O_N ■ryry■ .0✓y Y O Y i VCC>•' °� Y VO L O—� H N .O Y VpI M 7 9— .• L (� 3. L C i •�� 4' 4 O Y W ` W ■■ WO lW }1 S CNm T jr O "O OV. o ,� m see w' i s• F w 5 a y o 9 �: + V� "� w .r c �Y �: o "" r _w'• _ �. iii �.�ar V. � •ti R. IM t � pa �.tiY U�nM• =�.� tit `�1 p �r QY w Y = w O GGyyO C$ •�i� �Y :j c u$ �w.N� rL � G� d q � J •. N P E C � � � Y C� Opt 0 �� p w.Nr�{ Viii • rl o"- w 3.Y = ` ow.ico uii ire ppg DYLN vW Y • w �> O> r cw «r. .-�$' N r T v CA Zg , j M GGr �Y I ►.� r �A '�� .Nnv N <$u Y3`o N.. yy! o. Nn�� =_"` � O Yw ~ N•• '•� ►$Y' 6Sv r&wc�.G°r uQ `° -c r► Y m CC cz W W J MM r Y C Y p Y sx -.T q C O t1 V O^ IL �a _ "vp!'S gam. r I`U`♦ "'g N`�$o Y.00`p NwpO* YwyC Y YG Y O way R Y C C a i ` IR OY�Or p �0Y1 " }O}YG1.V +•mss p0a •°-'. �� OY i ^fig 9'^^'y' ug PV �. Y •pppY€ �Y. C�C+i�~ 7a MV ar y. Y I t M> . »O� �4 P . r .'Pd teOo+ . " �` P . N O C �P � " Y r N ,A N Y ` r ^ P u� G. :L � y w Y N 4 � Y _3Y �Na . ° M•! . ►G. i s sat- G pp OK Mfj rOi)�° 'v.� - : � �> w'• � �• VL O O ° YY C�QY Y N� NF d Vi V as m�as a.. se cPY � � c tl� } 0701-02 09�12 -90 PC Agenda 2 of 5 0 0 � _ A 3� Z v a L N�i.a OF d t L o .— ' 200 L OW •o d d oLddd d d .tea q p E L 9^ L M ✓ A FD V N a x L '$ N= G L N Y = J Li. ^N� tl NEy� xEl d Y O+ N w r 1:1 4 0 N N w Lco C UA nL0 w 0 e tl► Y 7 0 %� O G� d N C S yTU 1 24 5,; A�d QE R A a •Lnc ao v q C n 4 d {ugC1 y V cO n `9 L'Y ac- ago °Gn E'E Lpa " o CL, L9v Y S a e.°. wn a ey u c YoY a _ d y. -40 v+ G V a r M 4 {y�� N" gy q W•L•� C qqL V qd +S G91n N O ..0.61 yS L 7 7==U 0 S.m LN�•aO�O. p ^ d T QuyiCyN 0 dol°r'"� W �' C Yf.n lrs n� O +� b 0L. �d C ^� r Ol.+i 4 If �a y�qu X�� as .�Y 'Oa Al q,a. d� O A� .; ^' =D .� •� �'� O ^ 01 N L E d d AgaV yL O � T !-a N. O LC dq`4C w d� ^YU0. h4.t ^O CL:w. EyLj tJ utM Ntln OI Yd U�OY O� G -UtldtlI ix.4 d N d ^^ d Y n d! Y ' N ^ w d Q 4drnd v16WN 4^ 6PNa i MOY NO L Y L d.r.M ^ 0 6z G^ K 4 Y V Y� Y O 41Y xL Lii iG 8, O N 4 C L d N a� d SI C C ^ + 0 4 V Y L =tlOC L w M ✓ A FD V N a x L '$ N � L Y n Y = GIF140 iMC C Y C w g a1 r u` N N w Lco C UA nL0 w E A 0 e tl► Y 7 0 %� O G� d N C S yTU 1 L NS Utl GL '+ N C C O v q C n 4 {ugC1 y V cO T^ C L'Y 0 Y 6 uq 4 pNC O C S Is o.+ KG'd L4rs un.NS ai o� u^ 135 O 4 C L d � A i Y r =tlOC wu x L '$ N � L Y n Y = GIF140 iMC C Y C w g a1 r u` w d w E A c cl r w a °c w L W wl c r 7 11 ws «� v on d i° a �, °«•_ ac ..c..:: i a ry v A rd i w o m _ odc 'c •'u d c c cy M m tt A V ^o d Cy0 O• Z o dY ._W qQ ^w E e +T Y yiyd� ^ 6i O.LW. C w i O ^ O EE d � � Et J ^ C� C i^.d q N O G Y 'iA'I y d 11.. Qr • w C ,VV � d d'•' � NA NC SAA O W aq CCq Y'OCC L I:.p IL�`r C Ctd Q9 YY ZZ P pp CA h 1 I S O O qOf y C � e�. w` d EA•S C4 N f.2 Y� _ Cc E Nd V Oy qE N dA Cp4 i - N - i>.. OA ► ' A v b o NCO ice. •�� VR Y Cb. qY G •.0 V� ti. Oa d F 9-0 �d L (H� L C!! Ci Y ^ rZi AL �N YN V. d y=u 'Q � � q +o VS c pv Q Qd V -� p01> i w IS lam, Cl. d Q � i.•`V. >.. i T V. cr �Qi c F$r O`°. Q a Vc q ♦..r •CO.N' g••�. �s ar y 7 i i RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 14548, FOR THE CORVER°:ON OF 328 APARTMENTS TO CONDOMINIUM UNITS, ON 29.51 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW - MEDIUM AND MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS (4 -8 AND 8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST 'CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND 6P.ROW ROUTE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 229 - 041 -I1 i A. Recitals (i) Patscheck /Hackbarth has filed an application for the appro-.ral of Tentative Tract Map 1.4548 as described in toe title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map. request is referred to as "the application." i (ii) On August 22, 1990, and continued to September 12, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho_ Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public hearings on the application. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to ;e adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby four.,, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga: as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution arf true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearings on August 22 and September 12, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, together with public• testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 8493 Etiwanda Avenue with a street frontage of 1,550 feet on Etiwanda Avenue and 520 feet on Arrow Route and is presently improved with 328 apartments, parking, for 631 automobiles, afid associated recreational facilities; and 1b)- The property to the north of the subject site is developed with single family residential, the property to the south and - west is designated as General Industrial and is presently vacant, and the property to the east is an Edison Easement designated as open space; and �; C--33 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. TENTATIVE TRACT 14548 - PATSCHECKMACKBARTH September 12, 1990 Page s (c) 'he project, together with the recommended conditions o� approval, complies witt, all the minimum development standards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and (d) The conversion oi' 328 apartment units to condominiums on 2941 acres is consistent with tr.e Low - Medium and Medium Residential land use designation of the General Plan; and (e) That the ;proposed project is in substantial conforme^re with each of the applicable provisions of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Development Code; and (f) The project, together with the recommended Conditions of Approval, complies with ail the minimum requirements of Chapter 2, Articles I & 2 of the Subdivision Map Act relative to the conversion of residential real property into a condominium project. 3 Based upon :he substartial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs l and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows; (a) That the Tentative Tract, for the purpa';a of conversior„ is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and tie Etiwanda Specific Plan; and (b) The design or improvements of the Tentative Tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and Etiwanda Specific Plan; and (c) The site is physicai;y suitable for the type of development proposed; and (d) The design of the siibdivisi;,yt is not likezly to cause substantial environmental damage or avoidable injury to humans or wildlife or their habitat; and (e) The Tentative Pratt is not likely to cause serious public j health problems; and (f) The design of the Tentative Tract will not conflict with J any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the props *,L.e within the proposed subdivision; and i (g) The proposal is consistent with the purposes of Chapter 17.22 (Condominium Conversions) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code; and _(h) The proposal promotes the health, safety, and welfare of i the residents of the City; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, T W ATIVE TRACT 14548 PATSCHECKMACKBARTH r-;';tember 12, 1990 Page 3 (i) Each of the tenants of the proposed condominium project has received, pursuant to Section 66452.9 of the Subdivision Map A<t, written notification of intention to convert at least 60 days prior to the filing of a Tentative Map; and (j) Each tenant, and each person applying for the rental of a unit in such residential real property, has or will have, 'received all applicable notices and rights required by the Subdivision Map Act; and (k) each tenant will receive 10 days written notification that an application for a public report will be or has teen submitted to the Department of Real Estate, and that such report will be available upon' request; and (1) Each of the tenants of the proposed condominium project will be given written notification within 10 days of approval of a final map; and (m) Each of the tenants. -�f the proposed condominium project will be given 180 days written tics ofi intention, to convert prior to termination of tenancy due to the conversion or proposed conversion; and (n) Each tenant of the proposed condafifaaium project will be given notice of an exclusive right to contract for the wurchase of his or her respective unit. upon the same terms and conditiuns that Such unit will be initially offered to the general public or terms more favorable to that tenant. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in comp ?` °nce with the California Environmental Quality Ac*_ of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference., Planning Division 1. Approval of Tentativ4 Tract 14548 is subject to each and every Condition of Approval contained in Resolution No. 85 -56, approving Development Review 84 -12. 2. Provide two gated means of access to the public greenway on the north, project boundary and install connecting concrete walkways, prior to recordation of ithe final map. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 14548 - PATSCHECK /HACKBARTH September 12, 7,990 Page 4 3. The developer shall provide each tenant, and each person applying for the rental of a unit ?_ all applic0le notices and rights required by the Subdivision Map Act as summarized below; a. The developer shall provide each icenant 10 days written notification that an application for a public report will be or has been submitted ta, "Ithe Department of Read Estate, and that such report will be available upon request; and b. The developer sha`3l provide each of the tenants of the proposed condominium project written :'notificztion Wthin 10 days of approval of final map; and c. The developer shall provide each of the tenants of the proposed condominium project 180 days written notice of intent to convert prior to:termination.of tegancy due to the conversion or` proposed conversion; and d. The Developer shall offer, in writing, each tenant of the proposed condominium project an exclusive right to contract for the purchase of his or her respective unit, upon the same terms and conditions that such unit will be initially offered to the general p<ablic, or terms :more favorable to that tenant, on or before the 180 day notice of intent to convert. Enoineering.Division 1. The existing overhead utilities (electrical, _ except for 66 Kv electrical) on the project side of Etiwanda- Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole on the south side of Arrow Route to the first pole off -site north of the project boundary, prior to recordation of the final map. The Developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one -half the difference between the undergroundigg cost of the utilities (electrical) on the project side of the street minus those (telecommunications) on the opposite side of the street from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 14548 - PATSCHECK /HACKBARTH September 12, 1990 Page 5 2. Dedicate public access 'rights to the trail y silong the north property line connecting the public sidewalk on Etiwanda Avenue to the Etiwanda Creek Regional ° Trail., Improvement plans shall be submitted to and approved by the City; Engineer. Any deficiencies in the - existing trail, including landscaping and irrigation, shall be corrected prior ` to recordation of the final map; - hereafter, the trail shall be permanently maintained by the property owner /homeowners association. 3. Dedicate additional street right -of -ways of 14 feet on Arrow Route and 3 feet on Etiwanda Avenue along the project frontage for possible future ,street widening. 6. The Secretary to this Commissions shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1990. PANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman 1 ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Pleining Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, _do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regulariy introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of September 1990, by the following vote -to -wit: l AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS t $uL V.A.uotiip> n °eow a n�'N'O.•�wu o.-w �' °c.`. n. qq .w! ^° o�aY co �,rY LV3iUrrYtw�R.ca' _.�� pqp°nm ca a..uyft. O C O.0 OYq O q1 ay N■ U .•4 _�� C Y Y S dCd ywC.Nd N RQ�4i ♦4].Y r�A 016Y ^� Y'O■■ yY- � N •� O � w � Ld E C L� Y C Ayy Y��� w � V C = C� Y P C C ! ~�OCWi@ v. �. �{NI�. Yp> cmµ `tea N'OO ♦OppaY^ L YY M8 4 Y p�6 Y° ACF C.N .0 Gd O G R O co EY o C 01LgNYnC CO � qC•i R C S � 14 I Y yN � - ` q —.Yc2 wp. L L _ C O �� V Yc N yQ G�.■■ NL O� O O N Y C Cr.d N C C R Y LL N y Y C R.V p� N O. 6Mp O M 0 O L C� Z.2 H O O^ G Y C K■ K 6. d.q ' C L Q y Y Y O U y . e 0= Y .�. �� +uo cau °w� yGy d ■ N d oOG:d °. ° Y.■ O C O O d 'OYR .+C• w N`� Yr O 01 L _ q u o + +qu cep u �riQa o`3�°oa$ °a no•(Y(+.� 6�YA 6H Nr, ice' d °_ws O �L Cd ° 1�am.CM > °u O YN{y��C y =US KN�ri.i; c`pYp'Y y L O G at.2® FL O.L O.ti a� m YO�naCOc F L)C r rn ins ✓° o« d�.i."o..i'00 N Y+ aC +CwC aJGV Via ! G S f+i Qp� +0 Q %06 A pp Y S r 2 ad ssY Vp0 WSJ i v t1Gp CN •� � M „V Nil M y Y N O q L VQ R j7Gj•�/ C H R EZ C -z MMq.C�I.. �' �. R � OO• S CY U3 ,M1�YC F �MMMMMM O N N SN 'O 6 F q N L N q 1 Yf W iq F =F `1I C +39 t L�Y>.4 Y4 r9..yq u} Y✓ D.i a c. %@N1b aYUaVy. dsA rG N.-,p �Kqqr `.M� 4 .a w j i Nw WOL��xt t� LsCCy� Gdg •�L O� 3 .t oppC��.NC ` \ Y Rr �, w R ✓✓ Y t u Jj Y N g M 9 � ya 64 ^"RpY GN 9 LE ° S1 GN t - p N,�n �'� C Y b cuCG.aarYq d L u•�MW II L R qw CDU NMN 4ip ^Oi4 =Og pia T, S•T • C N N O Dy R V L •' Nia�4 w p� T Y✓ G - N ^�^ al R_aW G O GRN 6NtaaVV LN ry.✓NVYL MtC 49ga(N�. N+a. y �. V yy6p u ✓.• wuL,,aUa NNGN #� -24'a 12'u-2--sr •�y3jW 9 �NMrW TjM .np y�OU6N¢� m.^..T"y a V c.�. tl q LY f. $ate �Ytd aM g'S N. �yr ataxy. Fu✓ Vy REYY bu14'- VRp�t1 + ✓'�'i' «�V.$YJ4 C'N N�wttRVtl at +c�� qq ,,xYL K1.i G. �i CN4W pptt NV NNiY.�ENYLT YGN i■=■`$ii V... LY✓ w-0 y+. y�C�C L�Y>.4 Y4 r9..yq u} Y✓ D.i a c. %@N1b aYUaVy. dsA rG N.-,p �Kqqr `.M� 4 .a w j i A tltl N C A" 3 .t oppC��.NC �AR �ipp LA R`- 9 � ya 64 ^"RpY GN 9 LE ° S1 GN 4aL a�3'��u° 4.cDgTYN r'� = pia T, N�. = yN 4 6R✓ ¢y � M LL tigY�V <�. y �. V yy6p u ✓.• wuL,,aUa NNGN �o KG 12'u-2--sr L ny L 9 �.R. 9.4 V c.�. �R�Laa�w NMO- qYV =w. LY YrYqi g'S N. ~�. Yy. �NNwY -0a Y L Ya at +c�� YGN i■=■`$ii V... LY✓ w-0 y+. y�C�C p.Nn } s C 4 Y Y iii y Y 0 Y. ✓ r T G 'a OI. � Y q L � NgO d 'ADO{ +f CYY L R b D C Y C� yJ ,p G✓••a NY .cT. � U RCC 0.13 a CCsb Ww/•3 psi 41 � D JCL 9.Y iA N4. pr u tic �'ee �8 a «c ArN x - °Y� " «eC�a✓ ✓LC. YV1 �p�N Gs Rw�u �'►L .°r r;.rc u... `� F 4 ww• �.�-� awt[`�v 'um uit aliaRst y R✓°. v� «R � aa.y s+Ti+��.,.rs .a.NS� awr §A�„ Lq..`Y' «N Q�� LL�.�. V'g a �e_[Rq�•L3L�p•�% .¢�QMi qaa. 4CCS�. pY oa44C V� �O �G -4yg�+V y=Rj�p R» « %. ✓' ror Gv} MR ✓Ye '"�L +s'`u"✓✓y'sYo�3 arn� ad Y� ^y Q` ►ra _�V Y� > A- C!'•p.Q (' qM�✓ Y✓. MLtI NCCpC �` ;RCnpL t ✓i�yn {`,RtlYN -to yGbL V. •4i 4N C R R N✓ u w p 4 2 G s M V N.tp• R w O L a- V N C a✓ Y R�g)„ i- CVy 9. f� �aIR ��Y4CY CO yi �, `w,tdt M�A as-, v. a U 4Y 5- Vyy - 1; 1411 H�. 9Y{� y AOOWi.i y�� 9A•i R. L„ L 4yy 'nG MR cvcs & %ray 444 M.o-M, &�+.p ✓ 6 ��• yN M. w w TA i. O f N {y+k+. N R C a 0 o L + YQ 4 v V w. G 4L + 1 V R A C= LY N A Qy■bi 0�..� L Lp= MO 6 G •gww9�' �O NRMY et Lt CS'=G. ;D PC Nt M� L,Gp � }'.0 LSY RC ®.Gi MyY•Qw�Yb QC =�L`. �V` oYLr.�Y w a'.�6 ✓} N1 9J3�'Viy` `C+ 4 YO CM ix GY��_A G «aNaYaa�w++ d R0 -.7 g �`fi' `pCC R ✓Y =H. ✓✓.LM+p.•4y = y`4y.RR L y0 Y f.Ci Ncc L'x L w L a 1"i Q Y N cw Ed 11. 0.V 8✓ MVy+.y✓ =Cw D= C�Owu 9d tl» C YC • =•.9Y."� tlM VgSi 4• G Rw qC G✓ py3 �9 CSa w..y��G.n yip�i C� o x� LLr. lC�a7 A Y _MBQ ✓ L V a V L i m« f- C g L Y R R a1r R L S IC 9 3. Y X T A N~ V} L 4 L G `.. O b d -.69 > h' � 4 H �iw. � V R E w it 4� 4 w L Y Y Y b L« 6* e s z �A O _ i �eMO rt.0 w «3 �ru .�iY°� -L4 �S� «��a° v O L °p°a� �o oa �� opo oCCO YC`CC i>ei cv n.. . C Q O C C C a e h LOO.Y NLQL ,^p`• N rk N. NO OC y ;� Y ^q0 Y YCO. t`p01 G1m r �N.LO9 Yo L�L Y C CudY ■C.9L wO Ou01'� �� Y�Sd5Y6Nq 6LP.L q C O• dY L ^N oM Y W O ON uo wo YCO O�OOe rD6u.Y .rf o9�� ■u 4^ G VV NYC >' L y W iN+.ri v i 4 L j-p D _� o� y.N+ .. 4 M L ° � a•-�.m uue yw ^_ : outa,tw„N w ' ' �i�� N LL CL.N 4 4 Y y T^ Y CNO WO" LG6Y•t3Y .1Y. ONOO ^NU9L � y-t5 N OL. �O .. �NC•a NHY^ NNp ■VS L <L @OLC Q ^.O M.'. Lu.' Na.„ y O Ogpl Y y L l DO 4 ^p y YI K a N O wy a C� L- Irt 5 ~{�TC L•TtiC N y^ VL NCC YY. pOn y WL Q�OOiY�.x M``. O�NC OLIUCNG C« y�yYCf ��== GOLOO QEw YC •t4 qY O O�.wrL ...Y Y�{I ��+ • N0�`. ^NON E DLO y l•1 Y 9� � N Y G N ~ y M Ld 0 1V y N •• q q.. N O.! S O Y N Y 01 ` 01 YTsyyy` L cgYO. ~V NdW Nyd {L1 C�Y�O.q CMO 6r .5 OIY'O�C rSO 4W O'1 •aO N.^ J 1.O. W d I'IuVi OIL OI n V C L` LL L 4 C C L N + w 4 �~ N p G ►� S, LOL qY d. C NY Y4�N L g N M Y OC a 0 C 6 pllpiw C Y g C C O qC N 17 ld YY O1 CcG y Y may/ V yY 4M `w Y i N L ■ Y N~ 4�N ^•+ ii10 L�0O�yYy ^�O y1�q .2E �O `.YV� L C p ♦YN♦1l14O N � N g N < N .� < N = N O H N L < N V � •n OI A 019 M: O p i q� Y 6 i Y 4. O A G N d. �N1 �'A�� ( • I I i � V I. p • l O_ a l r O L Y w C G a r C Q O C C C a e h ^ Y I i I C ^1 .••.Y. C NL ^O !OY� !N1 Ou01'� �� Y�Sd5Y6Nq pe YY q C O• O yw Y W Y Y D.O qq ✓. y pqCy Wt1S0 A ^ ■u 4^ G VV NYC >' L y ad MLq L <Nw65 Z. N 4 L j-p D N a ^ 4 M qLp V u C Y d v F IF 11 L= ^N NNp ■VS L <L @OLC Q 5 Y.y. 5 Vy O. Y 'M1t4O �y1L ~� V Oy ti, rx ��+ } •`'>1 ^NON 00 LP lsY1N C Zoo yyQ1 YTsyyy` qyE cgYO. CNQ +. •ti i + O.L y�Yq N.^ �/O O YO+- �'. ••. p0p9gM ^OC 'n. O q. y • y 4 �~ O S LL 0 0i>J G°' NO 60 YN YYNy ^. LOI �.N. W yCq � yqM p1 6ryM �iOG> V yY r�OC Qp� yyOq O L MM ��� 01y ^Y L1 V Oy L. 01" YL 0y'4 ^C ajp Oc C p ♦YN♦1l14O +O CYaC f 9 yL C L0- JCtC NO 7. Lw. >y. >L�Lp. Cq >O.q d. �N1 �'A�� �oC C •.Y ^ -, Lp OY� �! .8sO pN 0� �p4 G� >' apd `zuI .Yi1Ny■ > C w LpYL ka. �. y■ �'bt Y13 -2+m C S N O `^ < 0 0 su 4 i r ^ C p N i L O r 6 4 < V < O p F O N D Y (Fd S q Y [ N r [q L 1rNf W 6 p• N y W q LYgy yyNa, w(y.r Iry C"c 1 �ii° Gc$cg 4 Q(� o,it ♦Y Y ^qq4 - U .2 gNpY o� PS sg+�_ 92Lo ��G ■i zv ►l xsL it oo"$ CNL N Y M ¢O. ^ 4LLJLN � N bi yy = n P .�. 5g�i• g0 a:�v Ya E uY O ,# 0'2 CqZ FL�`4CY yVy �C1COC ,O L V r N _G 6} fit Y 4 L q 4 G 449 MA ate. 4_�R �.V GL4 V � - �NY� G��q QY, T�+C� �w V6r 4Yiaa Vct"I ,�04� ACA qq> qL 1.4 >� qL✓O• ICCaOY f- 440 LyN� aS O.5 yCy°yy yLaNC LLr6 I�iS \-1 `! \�, '41 i= mo °eu Sc=o� &Y Gy, a H a �` £c 8 oaba ��Z- I- o0 G q yyyyHyY Y � .. rY1rgY i�NO w �C »Q i Nay•!!.. yML glii GCOd Ol VY y�eG L ize. .--Bt 4- ILO V�u_1 D, t G�RRw"nm4 Fac ^u V ✓ p iti O.,I. CVvu �_•} qQq L 4 TT � �CNUY yLn.w6 q wri N. V y y ^tyy I :a 4.° Yg •^SpV Cpy ep4 ���y �N/ GpLN- 0 �00•.O. W.. >V4NY. M `� �q q�q M b0 wC C N ra.A L.NrCw O Lu=A C' Yy rLs .;-.s O u O' M a q L ` O Y r Y O V P faM 4 i O ty O •� V `, O V tYJ F 6 Y L O F•'V W l ` O.0 tiro N4.0 'N � O ti0 V C I{ N rl �N� Mf iI 4621 ^f z ..z Y M Le 4 Q(� o,it ♦Y Y M - U C yR C gNpY N �4 ?oC ��G ■i OZ Q aN.Vl cLy C .Y L u b qq Ol ga °wCCT Vat ■CY bi °[6 u °C i_z cw.7i' ^ Yau r -m Vwccp ZL 3` NO. O C.r� ah V s 4 G 449 qq■ ammc �YVy � y 4_�R �.V GL4 � - L~ QY, N•1C��. s won o P AGO �' `� OC L vim. ca "f wo 4 o4 `°H M Y `°-c VY O qL y IL L Gq .-a-. Y =E C+ b.9; N Y C V im. �L Y.,` d �5cw w`A - OOy �Y./)• tl Y Ndyu4 ^M'Yy `Y q4 ��/ w .yc Z Y 6. Y L D �AC ji r YSY bW`.Y YC ^ LY4 q.J pyp CNC ML� L 0Y V■$ Pn,Y Y■ 9 G P � M - P� Ms�EY r O_� M L }.9 N N IL H q Y O� C4 A O 4 D1 Y N C ,; C 1-- .6 Y yam 4 �: b ITV Y - 4Y o Y vw • �;g�x c �.�� a- Jsov3 §.--* sk w4.. ,`. ..wiO GX, �4 L a0 9. � %b- qY. C4 G 4 C.r °Y, +Is& GP41 Vw G^ YL. `. Y N �• W Y y 4^ P b. c .o P}n O�■p�V Cayp m� H N'Q 45 Yp N M ` o 210 . aOlru JL 3.. C N' ®w �' O,r f. iB, L t pN V OYMw V O LE y■ C W1.= yV eOp O..W.L V. r —C/ 2 {j (� EN1 LHr �Tua .YV �• U ` OIL NA L jai tJU O qq -°g 'tZR v Gr'! C +G � C >Oq 4. �tLi� # Ci.. • � Y � G V u0i a =... :Ac ■py�Gj},(;� YM J ice. �V TO MpD! YN� q FNG Y <_T ILI i N G C� VIM CO�9 S�YYj Qd O .dq�am p r C�jy O•.G LyyO G �Ly.p{ '`LY17 Uz Y N �.NW N U�wi V 4. Y Y y 4 L ri 00 ZwN. 4�. SN 1» Cp. 01.'�V N' yl GLr� A■ r r �+ w N 4p y�+ LC 01 01N `rti tUy V .�G�Y ^ 4 y GR N2� L U... q0 G'GR ■■ L Mr � MU y° Y S w r"' H � Y'" �� AD Olt �� NO«CCOyC OI � p Y~" CN 4� 4 Y�NQ4 '�A .�`^ Y m Z K O u Y 0014 } Y A Z N Y O� i^ d T Y p► yC L w{ q N xrU Yr �O GCpM V4L UO 4L. >9 �� �N. I.Oa9 SN iM l4L C6 LM pC O 1 1 1 b ca `oc v rcu u Euie{�; o: a .. eioE�pp. "zZ o"s e� _C~ 7� ~ r N OOM VOF ® UT.CM LCH_M wGa.L -VY 7. pN pm A S Y VcO2 q9. p A_ LNp `O yip YI.YYa m S O = G Y as-2 Y S y % &.4 C i U YON C 4' p= ,4% G UUtV� EY O N aUrCY G099 -,a- 0-0 p Y T OI 6 r 0 C y 4 q L.G a r w Y w 1 U 4 a Y � ^� ��Ypp O .5NN E E.fw~ S • L U.. �j6 ONtY ++C LEIF,I�.MY pY. jCY� =Zd aya5 �YYpQ ZC ^pi ~ `O^y" 1 64 Y 01 G Y »Y O.I{Ir yV' LAM O B'Y G' a!Y� cppyl fp C �sr0 NgOEy iNyCN �b AL NO\C O• Ay V�G� 'Oy L 1�. „Y VC�Y1 :at% 6 1161i MM CNC .OT ■aN rZ -1 �'Y y �1y s�V.k 6y a w p$ J .;7. yy Iz �t.il40 • 1°qn' ��^ O aVO�/ r01C Y a�� � .X.Oo {0l 0 r � Y Gw MOC{. COLLrly ^! ^9C Vt 342 0 M7 Y N G-`-Z q IS.'s = rY` NY_C CV .fir C pp'~ C _CO OyW = M cla Q_ ■nT CN �rY ' C~rVYS1 V G� Lr C04N UE �c 7N�.U'f7 S^7t Z�C uyO Yw OK V A Y'O NY G� O� .� WGO �Y�11NOO V� .�0 Y T_4pYy oO LN yf: C� G L N C O �� 01 V U �� pLpy� O_N l ay34Y. >Yp 9 xy �A C�Q „Y y VI VCR OOYyy r V NYV�� �O AO. �C�■rl NC ■(�p�j Zr.V_J NY LGCY�Y P{O{�.Y ,tY M yUy WNV WLV �4 lot Ca Ox *.� f`AC �Li IC OIY w i d V' t sL. u u u NO u o .alC �'Aw M.ai� �'�Qjw i GscLS .rj Q: w�� w'P V Y 4wj .QTY YY MtlC Y VY N Y 9 V w N C q OG Yy Y C Y V++G m t Y all iY M R YYYN HIM BE ■p6Y w O R � 0Y iwy L y N G w ai4+Y L �xi� milli �,. w9 Of RM O u RG + Gf n.� ONV A` Py 8 NY�O NNE PM Y Y aY BZy w a a� �.. may�r .°.° ► °: 5 K9� 75: i'rS � Yi y�L ` •I�M CY i CVO ■� o1G4 ` Lw y 4L Oy��tl. YL{, � A 4O• O Q 9yy N� C4O FIN CC pp V. C fitly NC d Y N c� �YY. �` 1. Pw ZS N Y Lr E "` a pGDL LyL L4L C1= ti 'Q • a2 3.5 yR}� t y� w � N * �� 4 cC N tl Y ��tl✓ �V GG �� «' i i u` D 4 w C pUp p� `N�V t L yW.tt4L �GMYW NC a; YCG4 6wM °` r�Y '�U Gr N` •L� F 1rM WMMPU Y .�pyf W F i O 4w Kw6+ G ��y W!1 Cy A O4 M uCi 4 4 YLCI iCCCNLW Y. A Y TLGN r Y sL. u u u NO u o .alC �'Aw M.ai� �'�Qjw i GscLS .rj Q: w�� w'P V Y 4wj .QTY YY MtlC Y VY N Y 9 V w N C q OG Yy Y C Y V++G m t Y all iY M R YYYN HIM BE ai4+Y L �xi� milli �,. w9 Of RM RG It Gf n.� ONV A` Py 8 NY�O NNE PM Y Y aY BZy q a� �.. may�r .°.° ► °: 5 K9� GM G� iMr �0 Yi y�L ` •I�M CY i CVO ■� KM t Wl P' u °mss ti. 4 ffi A J N At S a ,It y C« NtlM.Y .alC �'Aw M.ai� �'�Qjw i GscLS .rj Q: w�� a •P�a ua iL sw 4wj .QTY YY MtlC Y VY 4 MN �~ all u- HIM BE ai4+Y L �xi� milli �,. w9 Of RM RG It 1311� •6 w a 4 w�t0 q�L {Sw V �s W M.6G 8 NY�O NNE PM Y Y aY BZy q a� �.. p a 9wy l r�T'7 i NI FIN S a ,It y C« NtlM.Y .alC �'Aw M.ai� �'�Qjw i GscLS .rj Q: w�� a •P�a ua iL sw 4wj .QTY YY MtlC Y VY 4 MN �~ all BE ai4+Y L �xi� Oypy a �,. w9 Of RM RG It •6 w a 4 w�t0 q�L {Sw V �s W M.6G 8 NY�O NNE PM Y Y aY BZy q a� �.. p a 9wy l r�T'7 S a o L L > � c Co A O o � p . JOB 6d q yL PL O Y J^ V YaY` O G tOi Sri vN 9do V ` a w C W y y q L H L tbtii O ~ O L6 u N d e � � 1 O A OM Y CL � Ll�d C O Y t. a 4 `s rop Y 5 6 'u 3 L° 3A 2 � x p. t'unw V° 00•t Y V L CC p OMC V O a a M p4 4 q ELxCT YLc� � O9Cpr yOy RCLiL C p 0 O M ? Y OY�/ L L N GQ A �. •. ' T V y O ■a O'V OQ+ Y. YMr y 6 M L axau%' a°i� COL 'i6 N YOr Y N C�rCCV C�aW L at qp {J axiY ;u �4 pM D ^:.Vt oo`6i O `N CC 6 V� uu A LY •. Y as N ° >N.o _� •v Z' Y• Y a Y V g L Y y�yA �� oY � 7 ^ L L } a� ^L V^ O q L L A �.� Y • 9 N V 9 it N O IL {� 1. dL E yyV LnF P ^ =0 ^N � °L V Y� y�V VY ^0 �j° °VYN4 t� p4 �� gCg L yVyY LV C4 d� O'O Y L v s `C 4 ^ at'tari wLOa xxn a st Y i G,^ .0 Y O t. a 4 `s rop Y 5 OMC V 9f 4 e a 'MC C. 0 Y XT Y 0 C G N axau%' a°cai. «a' � e RESOLUTION NO. Alk A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORN3A, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 14548, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE IN THE LOW MED;UM AND MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, AND FAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT ,'THEREOF ,- APN: 229- 041 -11 A. Recitals, (i) Patsc heck /Hackba rth has filed an application fer the approval of Desi..In Review fur Tentative Tract Map 14548 as describ,d in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative - Tract Map request is referred to n. "the application." (ii) On August 22; 1990, and continued to September. 1 ?, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamongat conducted D,Pltings on the application. (iii) All legal pre - equisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows. 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts, set forth in 4he Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and corrz t, 2 spd upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission daring the ~eferer,.ed meetings on August 22 and September' 12, 1990, including wri =L.- -and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) ine application applies to property located at 8493 Etiwanda Avenue with a street frontage of 1,550 feet on Etiwanda Avenue and 520 feet on Arrow Route and is presently improved with 328 apartments, parking for 631 automobiles. and associated recreational facilities; and b) The property to the north of the subjLtit site is developed w` ^h single family restdential, the property to the south and west is designated as General Industrial and is presently vacant, and the proper•v to .,ie east is an Edison Easement designated as open space; and PLANNING COMMISSIOM MbLlION NO., DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENT14TIVE TRACT 14548 - PATSCHECKMACKBARTH September 12 1990 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial svidei:c•- ---esented to this Commission during the above- referenced meetings and upon the specific findings of facts, set forth in Paragraphs l and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and'' concludes as follows- (a) That the proposed project: is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and (b) That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of . the r 1opment Code and the purposes of the district 'in which the ;;ite is tor' and !c) That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and (d) That the proposes= use, toRwther w1th the conditions applicable thereto, will n-it be detrimental to the. public health.. safety,-or welfare or materially injuoious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. i ` 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental s Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. and ifi the attached Standard Conditions, attached ,ereto and incorporated herein by this refererxe. 1. Approval of Tentative Tract 14548 is subject to each and every Condition of Approval contained i in Resolution No. 85 -56, approving Development Review 84 -12. 2. Provide two gated means of access to the•public greenway on the north project boundary and _ install connecting concraite walkways, prior to recordation of the final map. 3. Provide a cap store on 01 new retaining walls, prior to recoreaticn of the final map. 4. Increase the amount of 'fish -scale cedar shakes on the rear, of the propomid gapoages 5. The underside of all existing and proposed carport roofs shall be painted, prior to recordation of the final map. { PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 14548 - PATSCHECK /HACKBARin September 12, 1990 Page S 6. The Secretary to this Dorm, °scion shall certify to the adoption of this Resolutions ti APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Seer_ =tary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereoy certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adogted by the Planning _Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held C on the 12h day of September 1990, by the following vote -to -wit: Hv:S: COMMISSIONERS: NOES- COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: -.i 7 i _ 1+ • �L�ru..c Y xvow ZYz Hcw V L OW 4 Y N -z V+ G Y O O d pii �rrS YrPS yyam^ Yu OCC $l ±p� a N'. p� �.a °. y'c$ 9 0 Y O LL X _. O.Y 50, V O d■ O R 16 �� NCY fN VmGV LOBO . ��p ■� �Q sy�4 M ::C lUYoL CT YM�6u V Lg� 15'NOVY. CLy �'ON.F9 qYV py V ^N 00 U' VWr'_Y _ VYpZ ys �rC�C9 ^Ll OLT_ NCO ���^ �aNY Y� +VO VyC VC +ate u00YC�YN� oo «u cu.Sdc $rsa'• v« �w�.N: aSYCSi iu,ec�. �iiusy"or.pO1uv a °�uN a�i� 2$�a O T Y L M O Lg ti C C. �.Q S. � O A ■ Y` O � �wE LLy V � ._ yY qL ON. N� '_LyV 0Y r1 +Y QQp2 Cy`q B�w~ N^ 9 ` u T ` N _Y­ OO ppN^ yayO . Cry ■ry■�ONa YO LC c.. - !{{{111 OL 00 K. V� N Y q s Ofl_ O ' I 6 +ug69sN� +�S= o 9 €aa "i z35 Y N I , I m _ Y • 3° C N an O O 9.�S 4. p'#d W O x Y rC�Lp O }y'O = O y 6 O y �4°On W Y qN C Puts d L V w B M_d pL p y 46 it- . 0. Rom V o QQ a L r' 3 de O pQ Mqq d Q� is •err. V.�w L pd; - S O Y � OOY Sp sQ ¢ C_ V N • C Y r LPG. L y � O. 1� o. o�i 'tly L i z ova p� 6 t pC ® 8q6 a0 Y,YMw.1O L �o� � O O �¢N sd � �} vj � g �&63�id3 n i� 4 8 rd W C Y� =1ca 1 °'° ° i °cQa q a >°.`°o 1. "t: « ° e +s- e `°ue t , Y o E 21 e5 o c ° j.+•,n 7 ai 4VwG'NYO O 3 V s oO'yY� " aNL�.~ sM u v YO4O�y e �.CwJ gQ° y Le C Y'e . a'! p �Y ao .N ayq1 o L luY p « Q 'SaV Y i � a ga 10-1-3 o° S3 ^4a egW4osagaN L�1 �. L $.°.. s n.qq� w. •"Nn. ` pp 'p�•�•\ y 3 V G ~L � Aa °O ® y�.NU� qt.. �y V ^ L u L4L e CS Ms LV`e b'I^.ly 1M� e6sM4F }O.•yYY.� "� � BCIC Yp �• L dC 19 w'Yp a. b.. l� 4 �•" «`t'CV VNL4�OG tQi �J: qyo •ate. a °10 a7". \ G N! i^ O S G~ 0� l` `.vCI[ c `mu°vqu ~ °oh C. L7 - ii"1•9EL 4.a•C�'O!C��Y "O °+•"rfn� �o ,` gvOdy V�-.00 �Y1 YYO� NOq O ~��. At�V4 ■. qC p> pQ G O.0 q 4- i {c�1CNLN ay�M• M°N ^Y. q�.L L.G. 4$ ~N ® CS ^ _ �.yq y .��a ��y9« YDN4°�yrft �;�^.: °a °NS °�,�'� m -'ir •w,a � 4L' e« «d ' q.:. «yyq € LaL �'�$ «"� =." 8 «Q$G §'q■ L +c am o•�+, ue alai CgLI4Y p� `4�LL Sn'� 4q GOlq'� �t�L ►su o0rop� v� «. GeeC fiey/ WHO C g9qr,ti pii�LEO M LqL��O ®�CLCyy ppy G� GC�u A. Mal CCyGy L■~ 6 A N Y rl N d u O S W x N Y y ^� O C Mal g M J N 6 Y U aeon Oi O.. emu^ q CONY . Mine � +u yW WUC w � GUq L Y �V6 ^ y� af G V W a ,2 &I. ^q N� q~p YN1�CLC Ap` `6G T4 `per a�pZj � Qt Q' N 6t`i T L.O�xs O..q C' �aaa ■C•••s� `2.t+.1sY.M C Haw ZL L PVC O qy ° ° q^ Coy `1O ~4 4� �� NLNU�.N N'aq�p "'�YO a''> OV 4016 ~CY �Y 4� ^YO O�q~�•�6NC��s •l�I ZT 4$40 pL ^ A. ^_V 0A N� '9 CL� 9� Cp* �~n L^ MGy�y N�OC C eL qVyN1 O .0 ti��y M Ari a' "�E •�S p'N Ry~ 0. Stl0 �s �uQ p•()�t yO yy G� i c. Y3 V^^ 40L.�w p� ynp4'L+ +22YA�i: gCl`9tl Cqn' L LN V. i!1Y C V G O `Y;L q �iy C `QQQ111 01G Mai N; ` G �'!de L Yr qL 4G L ji CI ^v V C3 O C�.CG li c6 T7 -21 M4y ^1yYY C47�q ■1 LY'NN'N^ L44 Gee�;• ry 6 V ^1,4k1 J Gg'�• 111 3 LL C « x L O S� °1 O` y^ N^ a6`xMO4Y y¢y¢G W-migv L'C °OC Q d� O • L W 6 LL• .. Y OG y ■M 3 y 6 S . Y L i l a o: Cq •Y . y V Ef V4OwOL • C O . C! f O 0 �V N 0 .. Ef ny4y C 1 ^@ C �qYgg p ® VGq O � ` q1 rCy�d1 CY4a0 C N O ! 1� 9 N G T y V ~. w " O V ap n IXv `ra'a ^5 I iu$afithiss-2N" � yyL G ��� Q1� OO COO�r Yid LAi G�ct LYW ' twlV �R N NO LC Mb ^4. g."Y �sD Ay�de r3 i�oi LY�.Ny�O �l b 00' =w1-11 GYG 41sacA Wa4 H, uV LLA g61G yi�0 N L Y. t dCYA401w GNN4Ye ^YOQO M 9Tr Q r�CCY6� O ,GY YNQQQ V6 y. AEG ��UNNa0+00 NO�NU ��Li9 I LY 9 a L �'Y LT ..q OAONY.V w.a eo & $_ � L��dbw `w Nc p �' O. q! iL Cy'� �� W NNd(p'.VL� NYC G ppL A��'r� N, ■N yL r� +^ Y.a +p O�yOyN�9Y. oy�yf^ aTPO� YY NNAYpp� =vAi Ga 6T G' CVfi 'C�JY u=« NSC n`o u._COC x' cL. � .yGim.5 C dN.« o^ ^CG-Gn LL� YO ^Np Ob ^V{�LMpN Y�`YN �p ~ C L C t N C C Y M ` O d� O N L Y'^ �M a Y. A C L y. �11ff N pOWd ��A VG yL Oe�gN"'� O bw V.q FYCC C¢Y LO CCp LL Y LA +e NAI.Gy .+.YM -wc.{� ^ MM OO b,3qZ mVY^ yN YaN. yN,YG UCi. NVr.V CC C�YY MW `M1 �s C y+1iV T yjq O 1 Lam+ NO %. 6:5 +L.�C OYYw yO �N .-.a iCC a c�Yl� hood plutt NY O�q ON? NLOCS.t 6.4 `8tl cQ N,O Otu{{ VNYC C N�t 9zi N VL r ya ZCZ O °bd OyN O!N LPLAV. aGMNY. ^NC'y GI V� gm ~ ^Y4 . N aG Gra N» O.�ANN �VVe +COc.�G.GG O: ��C g r01POY^ YiOYL GN4 G yG�M. CCY NO2YWCVONY G + ■+■4 N49c' ~ afw 6•tI YY .-.z L HNL ■Y VN~ O� t a A N- yV 0 �.+CLL�Lr`'OO`Y ^ yyA 'O pCd O�I N r N 4 N 6 N 6 M = M O F N L 6 N N a i LOt Lo °Y av°c� 42 c2L S ia�i�c[ c�" cr2 �°Tsi °gE-Y` ='" 'z"c:^ e „y = 6 -.L. v Yc�L af.�► oaf Y�wp�6�u J C d N Y N YV �� T O . L ' 21 a O T p ~ G IL V. o6q DC y'�VT C V E t .% Y 2, a C OC qCy O L r iA � V� C Y 'LO q 0 O L i O■■ �a O 4 Ka■i C G W Ar G V N � .q n Cy N«^Aw n L'O.N.i. M.- b 2. rAL .N C� _ ' CV 4NYV V .0 O. a �Y'ry ^ L ^M Rmy Y v {jq ez t He B.aj VeYy yyt wL=VYa M L.�i �Lyi `°� Y�WV.�a0a0i pOIV C V k, - -C. Y° .72 C ; {CAL L O y� �O� w.� � A P V C V� L a � V � A 1 y� N A�i4 C /'s� Y Yyg bA3 ZEE Y ~g Y pi■ ^3is yYN L ^bC Y ^ rd:L F g =i ll es L"y " °oAr i, 6 A r m > 4 0 N H 6 N t Y K C �N �~ O94C1L GG� �c iNr► WG OM �rOr f rk �SC7 �.rsN 1� at� a •• L`ow. pz� °c 'O OS Y.. 514 T? y,y j. maV« C.�` ywC C �V y LE pC1 ypC Y�SY Y C� L � ` YL2 q QN S Y O ,yv Or r K 2. CY O� wY at ^E! LN wO \per V 6OC V L y� y L'_1 EGpyuu Nay 0.ci C Odra p i C =OSV N 9 O O� OL NVi wMM aH C OM ` VI u« wp'° yN q�Y. Q. �t� 11 Y¢O d L � p Y y GGwG�ce � YC4 m3 G L. Y��N � y�3 = d14.y±1q Y.yyYY LY ^L". to w w M O �. 9 ^ Rex G W :5 m Y. 4 V YOG -.iL4w. CL LL Yy w {p� H C 0 •eYy^uL 9 S00 YC rga LO'06 w.pY GYM« Cw YaY ^�. dilaG w u «vNu �¢�i"'ss; mowY° a.grr�. «SAM $M. y ^emse 7Y 'LOI WAY. �. pLL. p. yCw9 4.Y. f «GC9 ^ as C` �L YLY pp V •N H wC« Oy y3S3�2_« N Si Nita« = L N04� N■4 S�C O«�p l�V�{6j. w RCN .5 w�.e 01 L r oY ■�C�C9 QLp YY oo�« t" o uYUi D6 kY +Yy{J� w`�{L1s SO�w'' 7 9 Y wy i y?V W q=0.v w S Y OM r ^% L SOtL« YR CL. wC Ow C gas Cu O it km L> IL i {atT ' � YYgO riL`..'fi `. •�.�d: Gf C$N °N GG o ZZ 3� S � � 3Yey A �7f ^ y p ica. ��♦� a �yy aYLgilY SZ' 4a�L �E`c C4��gCp L Ol Rlw O�Oy r 4$4.�.w oy 6S« yO $ «Y =!!,e "C ~ C 6w + L C N Y A y L wG. C GLi6 y q N. -7 1 9 YO ^t w« .ii 1t0. ! -w g. Y >O« 1 ®.. C46L�p� Y�1 OV 01 '!1 Lac . air o..J�V' To qNy�wpp C M G NCatu CSS p�� Yq.,w$.a tl� ~ ~yryy YYy C 4N4 � VM. LLLLp����� wAyy�yyC _C ^SG � -';� O ^y� YN ZI yNi�_t� aSO C.� •AIO« Q s Iry Y ®YY L+t Y. i�,.W 4. « G UZ C1 YO1 4Y _ Y qy �'.Y^ �NB 6 {S •1c0� y4 3 pN�{ cpc" 4 jT�! ^ G4 �i `a ^■ _C � Yn e L � 1■� � � pbb � � ■p ■ay FNO Y� N N 79� JLji K F9�4� `Oi OY110 Y1�► Wes= YYYy f AIN '41 5�y90 C C 5GS N19 wri. y A O u OL G L: d ` N W "s L w".d°1'rS'� Q`.°t $.a v $ A ^o" to J. l` i�� �YLLrOq o L Y r '~-u°' `� A4S.... iYS T y6y19 N p�j 0 pp�� U fyO�U L nMe ^y �`S c �G ^ d r G_ at Y 4 NN:% y"y 0. s f p N■> C N L C� C Cy2LGG�� ��yyW C �wy Y y �� � �. 6. V N � ■1 {6! N G O S"25 x O ! 4yw ^ d N Vo­ wA�.dLCd A,'pp L CA my0. w YNµ eC q+ qNV D N LL + +^ CY Cp a�C.. 4Aw. �w Vj`. 6 uVu oyY b.G _u i� + +Y� d ^. ■oy ■p, n ga. Y� ti a. �I MaiC _V ^�90b4�,y� A: !� �F ABM YO �.Y L ^Cd_Y Y3 V K o u u q& A S ^ Y= Y V O,%y N W% C +. CV VpAy yyO {�� LC ..11 C -.W if tiV i la LALx k5 3 G H N rl O Iff a 9 AM a W Y. LM OC L LTV q� i�.. 1. OA s y. C`p ��ZL'Z OS c�cp1S {yL� N Y ^.tea■ ipt q ' _ {V� i y A p V cal C 4NN W� Nv1 Vc�y�C O�.q�^ Y CY 8^3 =LO �Ltlpl Y.O -af pmf4�'Y 1 AV ° Yry�X ' ®Y S�y` yp ay.. r L 76`NY X'mo Ss rou jig d M C L'Y sA�JO qtr Q�u °tl! MJ S_ YC�C Y, Q`ffiW mb VL �iiifLL. pL1t V ^ V .-Zvi LLr ®. 6501 W C« q� GGd VCy, ^AI A'.� OY ��F� �� "IOi CpS fq•0. 01� {}0�� ���0 {�pp � ~C�E�a. ° ~$ NO g ■ cs�YN i s':r Gw d V A M s�4W s` aOi MCC N e M N a u ^a ti m s¢a i $ {pp a t' ^ R> Lqy"' rN w .Y 3 a � yNy C^�Q{ '"M-S 4A w wr3 wLd L,. lVV.. pop �Fpy EV �i �M 'Yip iiAo v0.µ.=Si 3-31,30 =1 4Y wr1H . . cry v Y.6 f� 3a-) u gEe ^P 2 % Y 10 5 a-- ga��411 w .u. ���}Niii ft qp yQ�. ��tiq��.i N O wW uY N V N .PYUSZlI n1 u w YL wp r. �0 y y yi WY. U q N■ OQQ,, L i ; C N 3rii $ C O v ON i 6 4 NVCV W WY i .a G� CC O ± L Oy N G N S A N C 2�' 1 o q.N.w aY A N w Cppw O6Q O �CY V� T v L yp S OQ x Cf.l w C Y- M O.1 R � {pr OD GY ~ p � p uq w-0Y TJ 4 Y 1iY L it VMLV `Y iA- .O Yt�L N Na W V yam. �y�V aw �N N I C^ ^ .5 /Y1 �N 1AL �. NO M .3Y �w�y'a C� ► °Q a pw¢ $ iv 9 Kai .re M Z o w^p• ° � '�2 p CC GC y e CY �ra$ cNp°yv YV O� Nu b w ✓Y eQLp� ya Nw OW W c YY CCOSY tlY 4 {. WxWt 4 � MG SN + Y al YY Y q NC q GW YN L1V 4Y iv4s Ls 6 � nng V� v Y N' Y O 1.2 Q W G -Wyy go (1 L4Q^ ■ayy b_d_i M yV� M. qQ �.N 64 qwV N C �~ O S DN CI�1 �L '���Yiy CCpO.� Cif u �i �4� 4'' 6oi YY COOL �1 DLaL � GS� �M, • (iQ m N u� 4W oYC�yyrL V.S q OP V�C ZfCi. ,qM C J L Y q M T 9 4 N w■ r p b!2 $x r � y Yz da +o. W 4 +y V CCQ L O q 4 Y Q yG ', . OuL ci 9:5 01 V i w . 0 w Z CCC V W 4Y wr1H . . cry v Y.6 f� 3a-) u gEe ^P 2 % Y 10 5 a-- ga��411 w .u. ���}Niii ft qp yQ�. ��tiq��.i N O wW uY N V N .PYUSZlI n1 u w YL wp r. �0 y y yi WY. U q 0.�4. r r �.iu s�N ��er1'w 3rii $ C 7 a Pa L a ■ w o q.N.w aY q� Y {pr OD GY C' � 6�. . LyY G$ Ww Ike U0 v 0 �`1 C� GO �N« /Li LOY L Yi NN L1V 4Y 6 tl go (1 L4Q^ ■ayy b_d_i M yV� M. �� W L CI�1 D 6oi 'K. �1 w r w m ai J b!2 $x r 4Y wr1H . . cry v Y.6 f� 3a-) u gEe ^P 2 % Y 10 5 a-- ga��411 w .u. ���}Niii ft qp yQ�. ��tiq��.i N O ?, LYQ E uY N ss Y�O .PYUSZlI n1 u w YL wp r. �0 y �y +yy 1►e. �4 0.�4. r N �.iu s�N ��er1'w 3rii -C 7 a Pa w� 4�I.i NAYCI.ii: lL,�W' 4Y wr1H . . cry v Y.6 f� 3a-) u gEe ^P 2 % Y 10 5 a-- ga��411 w .u. ���}Niii ft qp yQ�. ��tiq��.i N O ?, LYQ E uY N ss Y�O .PYUSZlI u w YL wp r. �0 y �y +yy 1►e. �4 0.�4. r N �.iu s�N ��er1'w 3rii -C 7 a Pa 4�I.i NAYCI.ii: lL,�W' r N r I ! 3 t Oy SP by ° ce a a =sa � t a 0 C V «e YY CyY J� •YC • L �p eSIG 1� .p9 � a Y V � O Y A IV, p«O Y 6 i rl ^e *'l uS .�. � 4 q�Y N d � •p"1tL1N w� �y N Y O° Q� LyY� O• Y� CY ���'S G �p N C� L C C 9u � N a G } �}_ �°°�y N YL • Qi (��. 4C`+ atlY ^�� L �Y•y� JI•,rpi WL rs t` y4O y1 Y i� L �po qqg 32. CC Lr =.5 ^pw �Op ==N �y ep � Ya E O OF $wy L r. ^ Q L r` pi-a A �=o y g au CpOI N�O� y�yogs OI ~tY�.� ttoo a�=i q' P �!lyi� ^�'✓�h.�pC� g•- 'q -& L =. Z,j ` °O ^�C l YLL ■` 01rY 6 1 �N � •an Y� Q� • ���'� �M1. rYq�� E POp �NpN Y ^y i �O O C� Cc uu M p`p}j tt C Mp N C 610 �0 idS.2 p Sam f Le o _sue CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT N DATE: September 12, 1990 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Alan Warren, Associate Planner SUBJECT:. AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY'S STREET NAMING BOOKLET AND THE STREET NAMING ORDINANCE. CITY CODE CHAPTER 12.12 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Proposed amendments to the City's policies, procedures, and regulations regarding the naming . of streets as contained in the Street Naming Booklet and City Code Chapter 12.12. I. DISCUSSION: Recently staff's work on the City Council Multi - Family Residential Study and last minute changes to the Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 90 -03 application and Environmental Review has caused delays in the completion of work on this iten. Staff, therefore requests that this item be continued to a future date. Respec lly submitted, <z- � •r Bra ul er r City P)'nner BB:AWI3fs J ITEM D CITY OF RANCHO CUC•AMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 12, 1950 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commissit -R FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Vince Bertoni, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 14644 - GARCIA DEVELOPMENT - A residential subdivision of 8 single family lots on 4.16 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (1 -2 dwelling units per acre;, located at the end of Camellia Court, north of Hillside Road, east of Beryl Street - APN: 1061 - 381 -13. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION; A. Action Requested: Approval of Tentative Tract Map, Conceptual Grading Plan, and issuance of a "ggative Declaration. B. Project Densit : 1.6 dwelling units per acre. C. Surrounding Land Use and_ZonipgL North - Singie fafai'iy residential; Very Low Residential District (1 -2 dwelling units per acre) South - Flood Control Channel; Flood Control - Open Spare East - Flood Control Retention Basin, Flood Control Open Space West - Single family residential; Very Loaf Residential District (1 -2 dwelling units per acre) D. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Very Low Residential North - Very Low Residential - South - Flood Control - Utility Corridor - Open Space East - Flood Control - Utility Corridor - Open Space West Very Low Residential E. Site Characteristics: The project site consists of a farmer vineyard and has an average slope of 8.6 percent. II. ANALYSIS A. General: The applicant is proposing a Tentative Tract Map consisting of 8 single family custom lots ranging in size fr,-a 20,220, square feet, to 26,815 square feet with an average lot size of 22,707 square feet (see Exhibit "C "). Street access for the proposers lots will be provided v 'a an extension of Camellia Court.. ITEM E PLANNING COhLMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 14644 GARCIA DEVELOPMENT SEPTEMBER 12, 1990 Page 2 B. Hillside Development Standards: The project site has a» average natural slope of 8.6 percent; znd therefore, is' subject to the Hillside Development St-1 ds. Since the proposal is for a custom lot subdivis.vit and no homes are proposed at this time, the application must comply with the Hillside Standards for streets and equestrian trails. 'No grading on the individual lots will be allowed until specific proposals are submitted for houses; however, the applicant has conceptual footprints (see Exhibit "F ") which illustrate how stepped foundations could be used to minimize lot grading. C. Desi n Review Committee On June 7, 1990, the Committee MENiel, Melcher . ColColeman) reviewed the project and recommended approval with the following conditions: 1. The standard equestrian trail fencing should be used along the project perimeter (a perimeter wall should ntit be used) in order to protect scenic views. 2. The Trails Commit;ee shall review the project to determine the appropriate locations of the equestrian trails. D. Trails Advisory Committee: On May 30, 1990, staff received a request from the adjacent property owners to the west and north. The request stated that a lb -foot easement should be recorded along the west and north boundaries of the project and that the existing equestrian easement on their properties should be reduced from 20 feet to 10 feet (see Exhibit "G "). Staff advised the Trails Committee of the petition and h1so prepared a response to the pet;tibners addressing their concerns (see Exhibit "H "). ".ihe Committee ►eviewed the project on dune 20, 1890, and recommended the following conditions of approval: 1. A 10 -foot equestrian trail should be provided on the interior side of the west and north boundary of the proposed Tract Map. 2. A 15 -foot local feeder trail should be provided between lots and 5 from Camellia Court to the proposed local feeder trail along the east tract boundary. 3. All trail opanings at the str-Rt or at intersections with other trails should he open. 4. The proposed trails should conform to the City standards for interior tract local feeder trails including fencing, grading, and drainage, PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT I TT 14644 - GARCIA DEVELOPMENT { SEPTEMBER 12, 1950 Page 3 S. Fencing should be located on both sides of the trail along the east and south tract boundary, hot #ever, fencing should oe located on the interior side only of the trail F along the west and north side of the tract. E, Grading and Technical Review Committees: The project was -;,!V' awed by both Committees and determined, with the recommended Conditions of Approval, to be in conformance with applicable standards and ordinances. Ill. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant, Staff has complc- et -°crt II of the Environmental Checklist and no signif ,ant impacts on the environment are anticipated as a resin* of tiis project, IV,. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Tha project is co }sistent with the General Plan and the Development Code. The project will not be detrimental to the public health or safety co , :ause nuisance or significant environmental irnpa,�ts. In addition, toe p;z: sed Site Plan, together with recommended Conditions of Approval, is in compliance with the appl�cabie provisions of the Develjpment Code and City Standards, V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Inland Valley Jaiiv Bulletin, the property has been pasted, and notices have bear sent to All ' propE -ty owners within BOO feet of the project site. VI, RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract 34544 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval and issuance ot'a Pagative Declaration. Rrpan ly Sub d, Br Bu City . anise BB :VB :ml g Attachments: 'xhibit "A" - Vicinity Map E04.bit "B" Site utilization Map Exh,oit "C" - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "R" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "E" - Slope Analysis Map Exhibit "F" - 'Conceptual House Plans Cxhibit "G" Petition Exhibit "N" Staff Response to Petition Resolution of Approval r� rrE OF I�t,. � UCAMONGA 'iIM P ION EM e I i w. w�w J Q: W m HILLSIDE ROAD Q � Q I � .J W S CITY OF m7l UCAMO -NGA PTEIvg: TT 14644 PLAN ION : SITE UTILIZATION N EkI 1BIT: B SI;AYE:nnna I 6 r-- E=TM MORSEMNL SASEh1ENT -RACT y4 3L34 -: J 28.Y7S 23'483 SF 1 /Mill 2 i.i6rJ S ' 2Z537 SF 1 . J i e o is' KMYL EAsDoemr Al 3F M,M IF J Ann v ,�` 120 �� -MOT � 1 SINGLE FAMILY RES . zs n - `•- E70$iRK !6' 7R1R. [�SEY(ilT . TW=T p0.92% _ r'4" 2&4N SF a'sew toll' WHIRUNA'(- C 7. �-' W7 3F. ' M IiS $fir flirt ' Hj \�G J , •. - -202X1 � \ � / G! • FR 925 4�° b♦ • 21.022�W.. jr / - 20.80 sr DL- -- - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - -- ' - -- e� - -- - ---- - - - - -- _ s� ITEM: TT 1.4644 CITY OF UC ONGA :CONCEPTUAL GRADING P ION � EiMiT: D SCAT : none { gig MMx �yy rI-f 0. W Q Z w °m E r iiY t co La rn __y� ^fw4 aL anMi+I -�EIO, li dNd ?. ^,•�� ���.�Y may'. 01 19>1 ry d ,� • 1 SINGLE FAMILY RES ENCES ! ftft ewsacn Pp WAa 14"" 19•'l -UTP 1sm FR 92511'�''Jlj LOP ��G�� � • M 20730 .:nom ,, t' {.. G�' e e I 4 1 . j - � ... - -- - - - - -- -------- - - - ;v � / ir ,CITY OF UAMONGA 1TEM:TT 14644 L PLAN ION T1TI :COPJCEPTUAL HOUSE PLANS 34 ' SEX ',:and': F SCALE: none � �'rGnnin� Jf4cT " ! 7't2T'T Planning Commission Attn: Vince Bertoni 9320 Baseline Rd. Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91730 May 30, 1990 Regarding the development of Parcel Map # 4490, P.M. 40/36. Por Sec 22, T.IN,R.JW. We, the undersigned prop9:ty owners, petition the Rancho Cucamonga PlanAing Commission �:o direct Garcia Development to change their plans for the North and West lots in this Parcel to iaclude a 10 foot easement for the Bridle Trails and that the owners of the connecting properties to the North and West of this Parcel be released `rom 10 feet of their present 20 foot easement to develop as they so choose. Hollien, Richard A. & Paula R. 1i GCi I if C.U- 9173 Whirlaway Ct, RancHo Cucamonga, CA UC,AM0N�s signature Gu�� /1 �i�l ell °I anti NC a1VS'UI`' Juil 05 Stevens Jr. Walter k. Q� 9177 Whirlaway Ct. cho Cuca nga, CA. 8��,1%'ii:j . signature V Taillon, Richard J. & Darlene E. 9176 Whirlawaayy Ct,,, Rancho Cucamonga, CA signature` /�'' Hornaday, Larry W. & dron Sa 9172 Whirlawa Ct. Rancho Cucamonga,,D CA. P signature �ILGLi Ai Catuara; Josep JR. & Diana . signature* c'C 9197 Carrari Ct. Rancho Cucamonga, CA. n v— V signature,, Mc Donald, Larry &Linda M. 9179 Carrari, Rancho Ispas, Thomas G.. Cucamonga, CA. 9215 Carrari Ct. Rancho Cucamonga, CA. signatur,ezzzr Dewitt, James E. & Barbara J. 9229 arrari Ra-j7 Cucamonga, CA. signature Tate, Darlene A. 9245 Carrari Ct. Rancho Cucamonga, CA. signature �t 11 ij ¢_ � ,�,,,(� 0"--,, err "G" t.. �9CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 2 1990 Post Office Box 80:. Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729_ +714+ 444440 . "It. Richard and Paula Hollien 9173 Whirlaway Court Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT 14644 - GARICIA (END OF CAKEL -.IA, EAST OF BERYL) Dear Mr. and Mrs. Hollien Thank you for your letter of Fey 30 rEgarding the proposed subdivision at the east end of Camellia Court. I would like to answer each of your concerns separately, as follows: Concern 1: "To direct Garcia development to ch&r>ge their plans for the North and Nest lots in this Parcel to elude a 10 foot easement for the Bridle Trails ... ° The City's General Plan requires that bridle trails be provided for access to the rear of a,1 lots in your area of Alta Loma. Therefore, staff agreed with your concern and recommended this to the City Is Tr:',s Advisory Committee an June 20, 1990. The Cownittee was also advised of your � le") to recommendation for a 10 foot bridle trail easement ("local feeder trailthe Planing Commission for consideration. No date has been set yet for the public hearing on this subdivision. You will be notified by mail at least 10 44ys prior to the hearing. Concern 2: 0 —and that the oelners of the crs ,cting properties to the North and Nest of this Parcel be released from 10 feet of their present 20 foot easement to , -lelop as they so Choose.' Staff believes this is a reasonable request and recommended support of this to the Trails Advisory °Zoomittee. The Coewtittee agreed that reducing the existing easement from 20 feet to 10 feet on your property would be acceptable provided that no fence or wall were constructed at the property line (fences /walls may be built at the easement line). It should be noted that the issue of reducing the width of your bridle trail is separate from, and does not effect, the proposed subdivision. Stated another gray, no action of the City an the proposed subdivision will, in any wary, change your bridle trail asement. In order to assist you in your desire to redt:o*- your bridle trail width, I have outlined below the five basic steps fwassary. These steps wain be initiated at any time, provided the proper sequen:e is followed. l'a.nnlatrxrMn uaw.- William. ). Alexander Charles 1• Sutluet 11 Dennis. L Stout Deborah N. Brown Nmela j. Wright rck Lam Alt P EDGMIT "H Mr. & Mrs. Hotiten TT 14644 July 2, 1990 Page 2 1. Submit written petition and consent from all property owners within the affected tracts. Signatures should be notarized.. Since the trail easement Is recorded on the final Tract Map, any changez to said easement would required the approval of 100 percent of the property owners within the tract. The petitior,--rs who reside on Whirlaway Court are within Tract 4256, and the Carrari Cart petitioners reside within Tract 9155. Attached are copies of these tracts. Again, the written consent of alt property owners of legal record of all lots withTii use two tracts is necessary (each tra"c-rcould be processed sV. aratety). 2. Upon submittal of this information to the Planning Division, your request would be scheduled for review and consideration by the City's Planning Commission. A favorable recommendation from the Trails Advisory Committee would he included. The Planning Conmaission would conduct a hearinj to consider your request to amend the Tract Map to vacate' 10 feet of the 20 foot trail easement. 3. If recomnended for approval by the Planning Commission, the petitioners would then cause to be prepared- at their expense, an aiwnded Tract Map showing a 10 foot bridle trail easement. This aap must be prepared by a registered Land Surveyor and is submitted to the Planning Division. 4. The amended amp, together with the recommmendations of the Planning Commission, would be sent to the Ci`sy Council for a final hearing. The Council mmAy authorize the amended map to be recorded. 5. If so authorized by Council, the petitioners %;.jld then submit the amended map to the Cwnly Recorder's Office for recordation. if ycu should have r' ±y furftr questions, or would like to meet with me, please do not fesita%e to call me ;t (714) 989 -1861, Sincerely, r:3"NG VELOPMfiNT WENT ISION Principal Planner DC :mlg cc: Petition List Vince k4%tcni, Assistant Planner Jorge Garcia �—�� RESOLUTION NO.. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF y` RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 14644, LOCATED AT THE END OF CAMELLIA COURT, NORTH OF HILLSIDE ROAD, EAST OF BERYL STREET IN THE VERY LOW RESIDF_NTIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1061- 381 -13. A. Recitals. (i) The Garcia Development Company has filed an application-'for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 14644 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred tows "the application." (ii) On the 12th of September,: 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public .hearing nn the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of 'this Resolution have occurred. S. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing o.e September 12, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: _ (a) The application applies to property located at the end of Camellia Court, north of Hillside Road, east of Beryl Street with a street frontage of 80 feet and lot depth of 662 feet and Is presently unimproved; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is single family residential, the property to the south of that site consists of a flood control channel, the property to the east is a flood control retention basin, and the property to the west is single family residential. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: e7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 14644 - GARCIA DEVELOPMENT SEPTEMBER 12, 1990 Page 2 (a) That tentative tract is consistent with the General Ran, Development Code, and specific plans; and ' (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent wi'4h the General Plan, Development. Code, and specific plans; and proposed; and (c) The site is physically suitable for the type or development, (d) The design of the subdi4 lion is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and willlife or their habitat; and (e) The tentative tract is not 'likely to cause serious public health problems; and (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 awve, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Ginditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Pla:rnina Division 1) This map is being ,ipproved as a Custom Lot Subdivision only. Any future proposals for the development of five or more residential units shall _ require Design Review sand approval prior to the issuance of building permits for any units. 2) This subdivision has a natural average slope of 8.6 percent; therefore, any future development must comply with the Hillside Development Standards. Any custom home must receive City Planne,, approval prior to issuance of building permits. 3) The standard equestrian trail fencing shall be used along the project perimeter (i.e., the applicant shall not install any solid fencing or walls). 0 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 1.4644 - CARCIA DEVELOPMENT SEPTEMBER 12, 1990 Page 3 , 4) A 10 -foot equestrian trail shall oe provided on the interior side of the west and north boundary of the proposed Tract Map. Corner cut -offs shall be provided per City Standard on lots 6 and 7. 5) A 15 -foot local feeder trail shall be provided Letween lots 4 and 5 from Cimell'ia Court to the proposed local feeder trail along the east tract boundary. 6) All trail openings at the street or at intersections with other trails shall be open, except any vehicle barrier or gate design as may be approved by the Trails Advisory Committee. 7) The proposed trails shall conform to the City standards for interior tract local feeder trails including fencing, grading, and drainage. 8) Fencing shall be located on both sides of the trail along the east and south tract boundary ;, - however, fencing shall be located on the interior side only of the trail along the west and north side of the tract. 9) Prior to accepting a deposit on any property, or the sale thereo ",, the applicant shall provide the following statement to each prospective buyer: "'lease be advised that the property you ate considering to purchase is subject to th requirements of the hillside Development Regulations, as contained in Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Chapter 19.24. The basic purpose of these regulations is to implement the City's General Plan, to minimize the adverse effects of grading, to -avoid _ grading in environmentally sensitive areas, and to provide for the safety and welfare of the community while allowing for the reasonable development of land. The Hillside Development Regulations include site design, driveway design, architecture, building envelopes, landscaping, fencing, grading, and drainage. For additional information or copies of the Hillside Development Ordinance contact the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at (71.4) 989- 1861.° 10) Prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first, the applicant shall consent to, or participate in, the establishment of a Mello -Roos Community PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TT 14644 GARCIA DEVELOPMENT SEPTEMBER 12, 1990 Page 4 Facilities District pertaining 11-o the project sits to provide in conjunction with applicable school district for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, if any school ,list'rict has previously established such a Community Facilities District, the applicant shall, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing district prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. Further, if the affected school district has not formed a Mello -Roos Community Facilities District within twelve mor.ths of the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. Engineering Division 1) A final erosio., report shall be submitted to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, and if necessary, protection a ^ainst bailk erosion along the east boundary shall be provided. 2) Sidewalk adjacent to property line shall be provided on the east side of the street along lots 1 through 6. Fire Protection District 1) Buildings constructed on any lot within this tract shall have approved sprinkler systems installed. 6. The Secretary to this Cofmmission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairmen ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary Lim 1_'m PLANNING COMMISSION! IIESOLUTION NO. TT 14644 - GARCIA DEVELOPMENT SEPTEMBER 12, 1990 Page 5 1, Brad Buller Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that'the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, end adopted by the Planning Commission of the' City of Rancho Cucai—nga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of September, 1990, by the following vote -to -wit; AYES: COMMISSIONERSz WS: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: pp�1931e•Y L.N V 79 r.T �.� C7 rl yyyyp N.V YOCC4 Vow pO� F p�V� 9 O t� �. MNQ YNw•Y +a• byp a L >rY QA Lr.yM�• a` AgOL� =$o. v" uYn. w'v •ni ^i as °'■ Yy�1 otY Oa Q t} qra N f.Y 8 CN YCtl `Qj d VL V1. Nt�� tA.q • �>��iO N G� BOG JO ` ♦GR�O E�O90AT �C C O YC�Y!. OYV 4Z�A p4��,q 4> Y ••L M OA■ NN EY. �M yN .°6Y 4�C pVV.0 �C Y LyWFY C4'id 2C4 C u V 6Y N,C N L UO �CYrt9 O *p p..M1O ?y.� •A•4� � SRO 7rs 1•. C.Q ywr7 YA O�Nw�+ V O.4Wp ` dyYp O{ SaSG° '- -g raa � G3� � CY �3O^ yd� �Ltl Oy rug`urYYio cot�•c'N pa`s qy��` -e' c�� e�d��� wy-o— yy. � �n °�q �L`Cl =YNU °.O 0a..yGY. NUL. qNY� a 40 yT'�rY@ M V {{M@@A1%YI A Nr•f•C O LIA CY d. CG'�/•pC� NG6C -9 N�uYyGy LLNYzbpo L'CwC VCaVO G50 R`O.o °��M• Yu�y�j 6CYC•rM`` aP �,�L yT'� +yy�U� 4r ~>•d DG QC m" yGCr• r >OGYY.ITTOh{. �y.O AF A . Y��•� 001 ��1>YN� NYC YC•Cl Lr g °r CCC J�V^ LGC•9y N.CNr �p.0 OY. O�l1d piG(c .c V V Y G Y .1d0 Y•{� µ V 3 N O Eo GGa r d ppyy 4 Y O �y A C Q 01 Y a Y p` �EYd Gtl�pYp Y• w.Y +r Ned NY'Pr L '� _N ~�N•Y'lA d i� Cy • rr Pt: 'po � > V Nu YM C�L ' UNaaia J � 1sj •• �~ WG it w � L! NMUY bO Y u�:::��o Y1n s = 4•Yf D Y �igw P =Vy 6 y��~ W .'yE 5 • Gp �.L. L { p G �4 Q C�'G EYG�Yrr 6CGN 1 . O MNN + 'Y '•'•� W q � O�O.�yN '- Cam= '= r`ua�G Le ii Y PS�g�€ d � �E3.P, ~.�. 125 : a a rO�~�aa 4.li�sgo... X..— Gd e O !r uCt 2aQ p(ya M"' G6�N *d0 uN O^ T•40� •17 °Cg3.�nY yd 6uyQ ��a� O ~�rVd p aA +a �Apy dLNU LOy. a N� yy N a O OI A as V M Shy iOpwp fn. {..y. MCC N L a' Y C L a y� 9 •� �� O 6 • � +gg O L COLE O.NYE 4LM^�. 9000• ..G.Na R ~qy p�q�NMO 4.V CC •w C Nayy. N IE A q C ti E ^gOR4dal LS b�Oq E�;;"a Yt1 ryy {y WC g%% Aqp ^�0�' ba C06 Yp +49. ilLO6+G R�p a_yy6q CA L+ �OpCAI ~$yi��"•N.y6 dTq � L AG@0 YYMtt V a Y�1 b0-.yy qG .Ca rG.'u ry�ry L•''3�u °pp aLi�� suv N NNE 5 Nza 1 i.K gqYCd Aid A O ^d0 �V G L N d GGGQQ 9 � CCd +Z y t. ^LL � ��C HN d Eye_ � •"•C!' A� A�yyL��tY"A yy�� �•.O• Y 000' ;�+ Y?N�eCY a+ t9 =N.- bj9. H d AM O „ a N 4 q }QAdAV �" A� O 2N q Vz Ne. r.�tj d° q, 0yN �'•N -,NYC; O.N.V. ? GqOp> 69 LtNN arc v 5 Ne w.+ c CCA�na. u+ uu%`z G iyy+c na� C `YOi.NNY Or d. Www2 p �K 3.NUB H, G nj1 t�1 fft1 {{ 6 .•w� S � w,� 1 v° -'.oc ��. '�: �i1.N- •�� « e�o"wo�,ry a,.'fi'.�i i. °�."�. LO Ct n ap � •!ef Y Q 02— ^ Y L O< r l Y L N 0 V t3 a 0 O u t�"YC ^� P,v A 6 NFL N� + a�N1�7 W�MM a +cam AY ^°, ca sEO L9 d ys'�•°�Z °u .°i�au n`,�1 „Nq.o2o � i .. L HEN CM V01p «CV �V °C ap N� aPi y ,n QOM 1M Z�N4 p a,CY 0.4 r°e L.a �.1 b0• L OIGp 4y ®p �� e+ N�qE nap FFb 4 L•'Yy��74 O•` O{'/L��' ` ' �r �µ �u�/•OO r OM.0 Yj U. N O yw y5 e0y.~ iCCOvY �r S y� MiyC V N /1^ V�CO `.���Nf.pi[9� Y�qY af, S r p w w y CY d F A� cC 8 E TC _Y> e.Nv O3 wsi ^q NPF9 OiCyyCy�{1 g+ .0v 29.-.s L a M N C A V q Vp WE V Cq� QOOO q,0 w,A/N���$$: at N= OV q6N +4i. a..G. `A,IBY r�' m +Y�CZsC +C '�.�r$ !rb ° ~�tb9 Og,�° b�ya d.S eOMy" «_ o° v� N v.$�re. �yJya 4 ��L §^,a.�`. c $" ►q� �wca � 0 a. AO' . O M L� N yy J Q i L 6 pp CC �T ! a°.d MT ■OL't! Dr D1� �M �' sL+yL ♦ a LN a O a-0 V. « y�•ci+a uaf bvc �dv cyy4c4 �Lp °.-c wy�be.r'.�� C La° �a„i �p�6r Abe N�y O �/. t 0• O !r r -S, C M Ol y b y G O g 7 rQ� W r. O G t L v >p�1 +O C4a 471 w�46zy{� iV M4 tq °{p�9,VG Myy i�b4 eyyY Epp, Ca rd YC VJM t w y9 6 r M G V L N O K � N P A' l K Y ,•9 �i y l Ol . w i� Y tl N G O V� NIX 41�'. 9 1y v Da qUq G Lq _V C O 1 :, [T! G CN� QR .GY Di4T� a q 4N raCC O tG _y C C' gg C T Y y N O R G« N kf pp �Yy NCS "MV qY Cdar{Q O. ■Y NC CO y$ai !�{ >Z O M 9 d p ^ R 0 4 • M rYaj W L A aU ; V a.V Y btl tz O6ri O � � R� Y Oly •'�O^ 9p }A�O NO •` «�Y occ R� N NG N° + �.` �.YGa «•'. nn�� iNWa>a� C � Y .^�' - u 9 ' LP- I Z.3 %z-.4-2 cy- � R n .tit a��°L' y {« a a� rri y ss� t- b da . i.. u�� MC^ dr y�-iN • y �G�. ` a u Ly V q .O b r O• y M.O VN q` G c ^- p� Gg V L Y C 4 M q VOW4 ~ MN R04 �. M ti O ^.24. R�G'� r X.; N' y t C L�a�4 D�6N Yy rW.f LTV Y ^`= O1� �r YY 3,.G x at ^^ O.0 z Nqo L YGC •YI G' M ub0 L ^y D D «A O ■_�J �Ya= O�R C •IO�I OAR.. ld. p �C'39 `u ... � R K ` b •. Y L 3p W Y- CfC� i `� M-'O� �`p � ` CY YMD L R E N O ,[ �� O i < 7 N F O w ! Y 4 0 � D M S 1 R a� K M 0 tl W 4 O. •� M r w M IF C r fJ A -• N 10 •9Y1 N S OL��040 ~93.Oi GY YdV L CNN t 0 tl 4 N G q G d ~^ D Y A C 6 N^ J4 C Y L G C� LY4'OA dvld q R�yD OIYyO qx N «1 O~ � 41N «' a yO PI N= V � • Y�DOD� laYOGL OFYy L ^ YQap v w o R b P L L O r ZZ 9 i j WV L D Y R _ Dy4N O O C RC Y a RW. N tq{ dN~ t M�d•�« R_ 4�r N L� 4 NuY ■pp■ O Y.� Ypl A. 2" N i� }'O « R O N N M Y t !! -51-c « TG L Gc LG� FL WAN C.N OI Yr. rC Gtl+1f YgUW GO N9 «ed+ WD D.g gdiU A $�' -d Y% qp NNdr. C'C •.4Ui 1 b ..N y yN of Y r LV'. ON D'qs�. NL ( PO d ^OL� p. D Y Y9A ?yyffV Mr rYY. bNO��L YN F'O YCN C9.yrri 4 Iz W -YYYg a■ � «` " ,�i' q.,C. VY„ q {NiO M a ^NO ^ O C W Y C B E N L Y° L v WO�y••r 4 O Y S Y 01UD D u N N L.Y ov- Y�q LV nG�LI L DO.Q DI _ Y a a Y Y 6 6 L Y O 0 _N � 6 C N L S t 2L. 6 N L w M L J~ P-_ R Nt OY Y =H OI N; L r �v A.4 � by �y V« C G. w R • L W O OYI�dd N Ds Y Or c L C ,L4y . M Y ^N61 L Y N 01A N 44 L adGM Y. >C ^N Cr nom^ U CLOG 9 C V Yy N y��OY AYr Y qRN O tC' Y!� D YD 21, �� MYY L M S N a 6 Y J n YY M A L i1 41 -334"1 O Y G * C��y cO C C Y Nr NRN tN^ CN 2»D ` �N; 4NU ^erC1a CRx QD <R�OL KY YpRRN O Da qUq G Lq _V C O 1 :, [T! G CN� QR .GY Di4T� a q 4N raCC O tG _y C C' gg C T Y y N O R G« N kf pp �Yy NCS "MV qY Cdar{Q O. ■Y NC CO y$ai !�{ >Z O M 9 d p ^ R 0 4 • M rYaj W L A aU ; V a.V Y btl tz O6ri O � � R� Y Oly •'�O^ 9p }A�O NO •` «�Y occ R� N NG N° + �.` �.YGa «•'. nn�� iNWa>a� C � Y .^�' - u 9 ' LP- I Z.3 %z-.4-2 cy- � R n .tit a��°L' y {« a a� rri y ss� t- b da . i.. u�� MC^ dr y�-iN • y �G�. ` a u Ly V q .O b r O• y M.O VN q` G c ^- p� Gg V L Y C 4 M q VOW4 ~ MN R04 �. M ti O ^.24. R�G'� r X.; N' y t C L�a�4 D�6N Yy rW.f LTV Y ^`= O1� �r YY 3,.G x at ^^ O.0 z Nqo L YGC •YI G' M ub0 L ^y D D «A O ■_�J �Ya= O�R C •IO�I OAR.. ld. p �C'39 `u ... � R K ` b •. Y L 3p W Y- CfC� i `� M-'O� �`p � ` CY YMD L R E N O ,[ �� O i < 7 N F O w ! Y 4 0 � D M S 1 R a� K M 0 tl W 4 O. •� M r w M IF C r fJ A -• N 10 •9Y1 N S M d L O y Ab •Y p C Y= GI G C �'► YGS � » irk. «.� �y° uxi ^`o '° ^yy N�c�ca .��� ....� CQ� GOn �.$C` .L aY�r� y mS U.�a.'.. 9q�DY YgG{VyG a4 9 »u E od o .2= 2 ua �•.� >V 28Qw S (' Cf'.lOi G4d�it w p pCC s C �pw s . YiW t y' Y N..GiYY `Yr G.L GC� Y. ^.� ..S,G Ry�j IVry■ OwG 4, v -_Y.� y.`U�( ^i R. qy C V.�m � +ass Y Y F!~.404 OiKi MU� ^ C L 1 M W N ; C O Y LC W.N LCL�DD W C 9 R O O a V R R -T 9 Z. S Q V N G 01 V bpgqd O,'$yCj� �q� V. -yiu� ^C6^ AIM Lw— FMH CI y mp wppr O — O M K - R O C K— y y aQ w j- q q Ly o' HOC pUGU V4C �Cpm �J- -z yCpuydOyd �QOayyEf� ♦wL 'VLCM p�4 dM L ryp GGG 6R d `Y�'N GC'^ Miw yN GU6 dG: AVY —M C —: ~$—Z COL 06 n �JH CM A. YF O 3 d?? NV Y^, GOG OO� O I G ♦M RS c+ O i.R jC ^Rna �GP O•��tT YDp=. •S �q.� N�Qay4p eY M u0C » R 9 1♦r O i L N N. L Y 4 L O Y■ O a •- 6 MY•r Q IS ESL - 1 ^j0Y 0yy YiiLII y �V�. N■ dR� ep 6g VM V NL- w Q�� 0 Y V MYY�1w SLRA01 v1 VCC 6L GU LLYG R��LM q u�1 npOq� nRY01 �Y L1. f n.. L♦ N.Y LH Vi M a♦w. LY C.>CPI LMGGMUtz L= Y6q�O LLam'. D{ G' RV OLO•wp♦ C off''•. G Y aL w•p• b ••. S` Y. Iii h R 4 vo^i .- V. W i 7 ca' W ili T 4 u 0 N u1 4L U L Rz•°•a 10 �ppvY ^ ^x « $Yp --p 7 y° tiv G pc y�y N OI • w.♦ • .rY �Y Ny b L y u V Y Y qw � V NC� c • Yv Y Y bO1n Y ♦ OIYM �wia 4 Iz VR c Yp V Y L L n 0 Y+ M ~ —e S 6 +n. L R p u V i Z � G ON^ �6up ~ ^ pNY �.a�+ ePy�' L CYo� CC L +{Y�1N 'Y4N Oas V ♦w Vay '^g M ♦ _ 01 •N� Y 2. +A OOyy/ L bw Mph 28. �VG �5 G y ■1 07 4Y'CC E 4.2. GL MY O{1 py O On SgYO. MVN La.YVu Ltl�N` �wG Og C. T �•q iVC vNy60 MYL.0 L CA v G C N R ^ b �•L. � ■ C M wQ 0 Vd aR O E ^ pA N N i O Y I. � L y►% . �.G•�^ C '� � y ••• 4 y10�Y Vy a,G 1LO9 b 01� _M` uC.p NM 'g.9 n L yyMP Ob A LY y p l L y ^ ^Rp M C ' ♦ yyR 4 Y G 4 .NM O1 S YL 6 CNC e■ Y LYG ^$ pp Nb p L Y app N L� L& ' L O pY `M N p y y Y 4 Ne N.q w r Lp V Y ♦pN Ow �.C> r C n yYY Y L V9 N� O••t3 b�1a�RA e qG ►P ' NR G C pR i•K 70 r1 ®Y L GC I 1 yN p Y W yyp w p ♦ g 4 A YS RO i Ng't L° ■ .0 4 Ot l LL L •�jj •N�jV N ` y� p{0� �.GS' V . ^ N • R A�aYC ` `K y G 'a�/1 O yO� YY.. LSO �• 171 ^R> uL G. N(�U•G.. yyY L. Lpr+ �pw rsb 0.1i.�Y w�. ♦ .`w C•p•Sa NCi ■^�1ai• 'SRQ {6 qy. S^ A9OM MMk CO Aa ' �6 w y 4 ~� "T%5 NL".wy GC YCCCL i_ iA^ WEEGGE% Y�N♦ONt OC �N�V•� Yp N N N ^ 1� L i�w C X16 �� ^ ^K YOC OC �♦w Rw 3Rw 40•� •L.,pVMY� DVNP y`yIca -I T. iMV �.77t jI NtI f•j N H d00 w Ga .C« Npb I' °ce _gc a oa c Iz � s`�y�cr u uNirm OIG. L�U 'u I'�o ol'Na �Yr� LLq °� °.yO Yw0 A A w d 9'�O a .25 r j -A L ~C�. °GIN Y6 C_ G � ­.o., Y O` T $- V. d O `w.� L Y $ G.°r ..a0qIr° �Nq Yy 1"V Q f" GSA° 'n0 aco_ on IL VzI A`qq1 a^ c. g Y 4 G N ■` W ywy Y Y 4 d Q p L N a 8i � j« $ Y .�. ^ =[a0� N� ° ■OpL Y�� Y �wC +..°. Cy AY Dui L.• r�wrG �' �r M.31 lOY VOOl iO O_ } YARN _V O l{lIr Y� 9NYY �iwy[yL� ~N r G Z O � N' 1 ^I 1t� IOI IOI W � Vd LOI G' OI YOIY A 'GYN LC ag a O . ■ CO+ Y OI rr�Yr Y W W+ N O «rC C1� 01 ~ L 9 a COI` C d V� YO1 Y CLGz��NY GLV «E «L" am v of -z MVO wi+v M r. OO N N Y OI Vi ® ' N N � a! .O IL OSL� q� e G.MQV V C � 6 LS r8 'v' �tisy q_'I. �' cu 0Y« �xlw A c A° ,°, ^y aC�C yy ^'i aw ,°. Y y!«'�' v ywy�°IO AC N■ dw w'p G^E92 dO C g `LINO 9w„ VC Y1 YGOu�' NQ Vpi 2Z, NCNC �wN S.�y =13A w01 V C 4�sd I,� O!y!1V wL `p �O ilk G4 rO yl« C y ~ f L + N ® 6Y p ^y GDr�^ �VeC y IWiI_ O I Y pp G�e—lb ONLY G °•ri'.r CVCC «w ° � ti ~. Or V Q0m�W p`3 90 01� w O= ! O a" N�YrG. V. Y C d «P�Q NyO, 0 ■CISf N.LI m Cp � .._r O C Y VYV�qYi +; 60 ELI c OI`t. �« ,pJ VN' n 019 YSY 6 Y YY. O w�6 y ya V C.O.g v N C V 9 ��T 01�. +�f01 G G « �y{ �y U_ V 4• SM nVVC E La N V MOM N.;ACY Y_Ce' E OI LN CE�tl OY n �vtO N y. b QCCr `' V O y ly � V 6Q8yI \y. �yV N� gp,OOY 1w70 O „qAS y� �p•r ■� Y CL� ItQ�Bi 1140 Cw L 4 G�. MY Lp�LM 6Y gOGOY tY �wI _ WRIV WVN f S1 1:7i O.a 4'.Cm Oli �OIV F~ 6 CI O Y L i ' o0oi uo ov c o�a .ri a ,°r �aa° 'Y'' Y •Y• �q.'•+ $'° V� ' yYy C d� d G ^^ O O q � i L COL-I COL• �TgG� +Yq N p Y DM y OyY oc y LLpa. ' L�. v C« L Y Y Q Q C ` O 6� _ N N = pp GC. O p A a V Y Y ✓" • d M N^ V N BI V W Olt O� N yO� SA 3 N 11 G A C G L ^ O. •C O q Y t i T O ts 'Y Y _� • ��A�>• � a Via' p ^Y �a�c a Y aE� s a� �� <a,; �_ - • � ms's ® L� N �, <� O eT0 • GOd vn y r. O� Y 1311 V.5 v_ as Y '9 A7 L TY Y C U It 0� <L Lp• MY�Y�+ 1�RY• J .•O. ^ w Y� 01 Y q YY H L q. ^Y` Y MY eu.L.0 A,GYNC Z; It C Y� GCHY ayY 1 p° Y e a> C y' 4 A U = C q Q ;V tN ~ 60 L T NY S« 0.{{ aON Y !`p Y�y wv ay �•• LS Y� aL E•pN Op. Y qa my IIgl4. � C` � G � C G• O. ~ Y Y lS ^ V a L p O C 9 6 A V L^ Y 9 01 Y � ` L H O Y Y L 9 a r ^ 01 L y� G U C •" Y �1 t. yY`I. Y NV ^A 6LL« �M d Y OR YOI L L) N�M Y� qV u A 'qiN 4L YOI ®•• C� 'SQ O q Y L� YO • M Yt Y L �• 01« y C Y E YYL OMY Y'.Y� VY. �r uu YG CL G^ LL YA m . p ■ «G �O�•t�V N0 LY 6Y•�O AC YYY� qY O v L C YCL OYC YIY LY •C O,N ml 0•I I 4 'd t v W] • V Y Y 1� O V Y O O C L 6 DM y OyY �N L< �1 oR�° Y Y� 90 G Vy GC. O `.'c. r c `v �• N C o0y C YN yO� SA C 11 \OCC• WON ppL �YY pCAY 'Y Y _� • ��A�>• � a Via' p Y AqC M6 C aY.L 7 GQy 9 Y 0 0 O a ms's ® L� N �, <� H O eT0 • GOd vn y r. O� Y 1311 sp M "5 1 �•� 4Sr4 Y C U It 0� <L Lp• MY�Y�+ 1�RY• J .•O. ^ w Y� 01 Y q YY t v W] • 1� Y.IL L< �1 oR�° Y Y� 1 g M� VM y !• N C '? 11 \OCC• WON ppL �YY pCAY 'Y Y _� • ��A�>• � a Via' =5j Y -aZZ w M6 aY.L G Y No Y' `TY milli ms's � r1'2 1311 1 1 CO„ M�.W MY�Y�+ 1�RY• � .•O. ^ w Y� 01 Y q YY H L q. ^Y` Y MY N 6M qw0• t GW C 1 t v W] • Y.IL L< =a oR�° Y Y� l as N p g M� VM y !• N C '? 'yl \OCC• ■Y ppL �YY pCAY 'Y Y _� • ��A�>• � a Via' =5j Y -aZZ w M6 aY.L G Y No Y' `TY {• ms's � r1'2 CO„ M�.W MY�Y�+ 1�RY• q u .•O. ^ w Y� 01 Y q YY H L q. ^Y` Y MY N 6M qw0• t GW C t v W] • GC v+ CON A L L J yDy+ A Y N O � Ott u � G TLd t 6� J C 40i vi n M- Lej E O 4 9 Y � 4 °rio uD.s� a O� Y Can d- M C q ^Z� N L ON.D V 6 d ` A N N ■Y 20� .s n qq � 4L cd C Y {� o° p Y ^^ LL M a N L V +a N N Y W V � 4 Y L ei Y_ C• T C A S N O N Ty ■�'QV EL.d VVy V G L4 y� JAY. MO V CCW P4s CO.rtl. 1L VN b Lv d4 Nd C aoyA '� � ■e� ^�e V33RY «�5 O � �r �•• o� C� C�Y °V��C �� Qqqy a'NLa 'CY`W O yyy � RAR Y DNS �^ ■�R C EsC ■O YYV �p`V VpG ! �p -y�N t44 LLYC dd �c ^` O yy LYC dN V q.0 N.` Q� ..S�o `u . Naoaa. VO O� A�a�, a Y` LC f�S Mc ^Dy: �• Y' L U aa.. ' y I` It V a _LUY M Y C M m L i —♦ a V£�C YCi P M. f p L• C C 7CY YU N C Q a O� ~ V Y P M { Q{• Y y■y■4•• A C! N YyY N O 8 S L J •. - Y _w a ' O• L - O Y E '" �.� E .• L` C qOq -M Q V C M -- 4p4!� a -p . OL 4V O ^.N 6 LOA V •d Y... 4M 6 pu Y6' Nds YY yC 4 ^4 y6 • OY 4p� ?' A BYO ° {L� E:. s` °.. �". ■ +° `r LS: OC'a VL ^^ t. C �di. 7.• WE'^ 01EK 2Wi 65 i7 O -'< C iN�N 4- � � d RY to YY C 'i� .• .. LA C sJV� M C 20 lam 4i�^ N . € a s • ✓ r1 FYV,� tali. n JL t� September 6, 1990 a PROPERTY OWNERS OF TRACTS NO. 9256 AND NO. 9355 Reference: IMPORTANT INFORMATION REGARDING YOUR PROPERTY Dear Property Owner: On September 12, 1990, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will be holding a Public Hearing, the result of which may have a direct impact on you financially. The Public Hear:ng regards, Tentative Tract No. 14644, the proposed development of eight residential lots at the end of Camellia Court.. Specifically, the hearing will; address the existing bridle trail f easements located on the north and west sides of the property iplease I see enclosed map). Nine local residents have petitioned the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to direct us, as the property owners of the new lots, to change our plans for the north and west Jots in this parcel to include an additional 10 foot easement for the bridle trails. They are also requesting that the owners of connecting properties to the north and west of this parcel be released from 10 feet of their present 20 foot easement to develop as they so choose. In order for their proposal to pass, the nine petitioners must obtain written approval from all property owners of the two adjacent tracts. These are Tract No. 9356 containing 39 property owners and Tract No. 9355 containing 46 property owners. YOUR PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN ONE OF THESE TRACTS. Changing property descriptions of the existing bridle trail easements will not come cheap. Should the descriptions be changed ALL PROPERTY OWNERS within Tract No. 9256 and Tract No. 9355 WILL BE FINANCIALLY COMMITTED to prepare the new legal descriptions for the recorded tracts, to pay the costs of surveying and engineering stud - -Rd to pay the costs of tract recordation. (See enclosed letter, a, iity 2, 1990, [ :sting costs as specified by Mr. Dan Coleman, �trryor Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga ;) Recording new property descriptions may require reassessment of all Jots in the respective tracts for taxes. We believe that' if ten feet of the existing bridle trail easement is released, the released area wI'll remain undeveloped, ultimately resulting in a 30 foot wide easement rather than the presently intended 20 foot easement. A 30 foot easement is not only unnecessary, but because the •'xisting path is already a fire hazard, the additional S _ ten feet will Intensify thl:; problem. The trails at present are unsightly and will be even rnore difficult to maintain should they be enlarged. Also, we are concert.?ei with the question: of who is responsible to maintain the bridle t,:ails should property descriptions be changed. We have formulated an alternative plan which is a more logical and viable solution. We suggest that no changes be made to the current legal property aescriptions. Should the, property_ descriptions remain unchanged, we offer to develop the existing bridle trail easements as originally intended in accordance with city standards. With this solution, the present fire 'hazards from the existing trails will be diminished, the t ails' present unsightliness due to Lack of maintenance will be eliminated, and YOU WILL INCUR ABSOLUTELY NO COST AS A PROPERTY OWNER IN TRACTS NO. 9256 AND NO. 9355, The proposed change in legal property descriptions is being, requested by nine petitioners who claim to be acting on your behalf. However, it is our opinion that the change will be beneficial only to the six property owners situated immediately along the existing bridle trail who hope to acquire ten extra,feet of backyard at your expense. We are the property owners of Tentative Tract No.. 14644, and as we plan to move, our family to one of the 'new homes to be constructed, we hope to soon be one of your neighbors. With this in mind, we are concerned not only with the quality of the development,, but also with the quality of life within it. If you are in agveement or disagreement with the, ,proposed changes, please contact- ur it (714) 987 -7673 with your opinion. Also. prepare to attend the Public Hearing on Septem:jer 12, 1990, 7:OO p. ', Rancho Cucamonga City Council Chambers. Your voice can make all the ditference. R Argc t f u l l y. R. Garcia Retina G. Gat a Enclosures: Petition Letter from City of Rancho Cucamonga, Jury 2, 1990 Conceptual House Plan, Garcia Estates cc: Planning Commissioners Vince Bertoni, City Planner Rick Gomez; Community Development Director May 30, 1990 Planning Commission Attn: Vince Bertoni 9320 Baseline Rd. Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91730' w Regarc ~g the development o= Parcel Map # 4490, P.M. 40/36. Pox Sec 22, T.IN,R.7W. We, the undersigned property aNners, petition the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to direct Garcia Development to change their plans for the North and West lots in this Parcel to include a 10 foo:: easement for the Bridle Trails and that the owners of the connecting properties to the North and West of this Parcel be released from 10 f-:,et of their present 20 foot easement to develop as they so choose. Hollien, Richard A. & Paula R 9173 Whirlaway Ct, nc 'o Cucamonga, CA �C CZ L r ;ITY signature u tt��l�a( plfii�h�i�C 01�f:S'O^ .., Stevens Jr. Walter E. ti�� .)U cj 1970 V"A. , - 9177 Whirla``.w}ay Ct. RRa cho Cuca nga, CA. ia��tlq�t,?� ��?,�j =z�'ld signature G�I Taillon, Richard J. & Darlene E. 9176 Vhirlawa C'_, Rancho Cucamonga, CA - t, signature Hornaday, Larry W. & S a-ron S. 9172 Wtirlawqy Ct. Rancho Cu- amonga, CA. signature,* Catuara, Josep JR. & Diana signature' CC 9197 Cu,rari Ct. Rancho Cucamonga, CA. signature % �� </ Q�J Mc Donald, Larry & Linda A. 9179 Carrari, Rancho Ispas, Thomas G. Cucamonga,'CA. 9215 Carrari Ct. Rancho Cucamonga, CA. signatureLdy,, ' Dewitt, James E. & *Barbara J. 9-129 IcLrrari RanSjjo Cucamonga, CA. /. signature �' _� Tate, Arlene A. 9245 Carrari Ct. Rancho Cucamonga, CA. signature s. C6 v r rr °m 3 G. -3i'a S a3 / Iri � / (9125 ti ' V 3� 111 •�hr •_ ^` I LL 1 v, LL O s GP JP / ''�gk ` i NJ Q cc L O 16Z E us -C LLJ h LU: a .��• h a � air F- p lanw z cc o sz•o� � ate— a�a�at -- ry k V 9Z U Kt N Z �V' 66J I � c 9£ ZI S£ (1 bt 01 l 0 ^1N3;vas �'i1V21 L 1V0188 01. og i oES sr'i^o•o�/ Jr6aJ f sa'sd. "� IZ'66J Oci F.5 8l LANE t ­Q9 ` TT aT 6 C U IN No OD CD co r•� /ri ao . •. Syr ♦S �S' Q a0 \ .at.7X'.— � -.._.. j�JCJj (� za •�� W �C �r o�... C $ 5 { •[ ,,s g2 J...''`'}:.Ji_s."NQ + yq 'n ry + + �, gY•• 14„ ♦.• .� 7 't• . � i'i ai:ti�..k ,..a��5h+x...�y..1:.�tt+•'. _ � . ':.. . � �.r . .. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA , July 2 1990 Richjrd and Paula Holli0n. 9173 Whirlaway Court Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701, R E 0'F - V F V JUL 06 1940 G &t A Post Office Box. $07. Rancho Caearnonp. California 91M. )714) 98v -1851 SUBJECT: 11 ITATIVE TRACT 14644 - GARCIA (END OF WILLIA, EAST OF BERYL) Dear Or. and Mrs. Hollien: Thank you for your letter of May 30 regarding the proposed subdivision at the east end of Camrllic Courw. I would like to answer each of your concerns separately, as fol ows: Concern 1: 'To direct Garcia development to change their plans for the North and W-.st lots in this Parcel to include a 10 foot easeaent for the Bridle Trails..." The City's General Plan requires that bridle tails be provided for access V the rear of All Tots in your area of Alta Loma. Therefore, staff agreed with ,,(our concern and recomaaended this to the City's Trails Acvisory Cot,=ittee on June ?0, 1990. ire Committee was also adr +sed of yor�r petition.. T" Commit —ae is forwarding a recommendation for a 10 foot bridle trail easement V'local feeder trail ") to -the Planning Commission for. consideration. No date has been srt yet for the public hearing on this subdivision. Yotl" III be notifieul ay mail at least 10 days prior to the hearing. Concern 2: *...and that t", owners of the connecting properties to the North and West of this Parcel be Weased fr.)* 10 feet of their present 20 foot easement to develop as 'hey so choose." Staff believes this is a reasona`ale request and recommended support of this to the Trails Advisory Cemaittee. The Committee agreed that reducing the exis0ng easement from 20 feet n 10 feet on your property would be acc4_ntable provided that no fence or wall vere constructed at the property line (fences /walls may be built at the easement: Line). It should he noted that tha issue of reducing the width of your bridle trafI P, separate from, and does not effect, tyre proposed subdivision. Stated .mother way, no action of the City on the proposed subdivision will, io any wary, charge your bridle trail easelmvnt. In order to assist you in your desire to reduce your bridle trail width. I have outlined below the five basic steps Necessary. These steps arau. be i'nitiateZ at any time, provided the proper sequerce is followed.. u.�•. Wil!iarvi J. Ale%ander Charles 1. Buquet l' c'• . t rhnnt +l. Stout Dolnirah N drown Pamela J. Wright jack lam NKP o �—=- t•- QV021^— -- �Ca.SVN'7NVH:tlNVJQVF--- 347$`F H = :- �-»- -� • � � ctst AO.Si srsrrr • .� •, . h n ,• _ wF ; Y 1-4 E 2E aS.W me sc Q Ic rJ z a° ✓ r> �,� x ti . g�0 �� 5_6.��8 lg�;�� f. ►'�'`��N4 L^ *.x•� ,a "' • • f b o�"yi a��c a' ! G 0. aie aw • L f / : : { Ka pn n, Is IV _ K ab of IOl JO d t f1 ` t Jy �- 1 0 ai OSE ar ' E 3 � O �w IJJ( • t rS iir. 1 ♦ 0L 91 1 c � b M ' � YI Itr.4 � rs• h R 1 - 1� i - Lt Y s e iano� d (. s i cxr d MV1,701 v ,a *6 cl Ij,O t�ixrt �.�.• ��4 ea st �. ,16 1 a Y > `MJN35 7tetll 7rtlpa, 61 r' t• rr ' P. ro •x: � i. a .o.s. tt: �. i. :�, �:� ,... �+ j ,' ; i i !i r' `� i, e � ,' ii+iiiZ ! j 4 j:.. . rv't ry� SF� r =;riia7t i I=rl('sj 't 2 _ :V = ct F _ r _ K I' I j I' 2 i i �ii� Y�j Z,3 V x� `s, .V e ) i '. I i K r !! OIY ire C U.y wit 2 i O E 3 ; r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 12, 1990" TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Alan Warren, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 90 -03 - CITY OF RANCHO 'CUCAMONGA -. A proposed Amendment to adjust the northern b!undary of Subarea R sn the west side of Rochester Avenue northerly _ 330 feet, westerly 1,065 feet, and southerly 330 feet to its present boundary with Subarea 7; delete the planned extension of Day Creek Boulevard between Rochester and Milliken Avenues; and realign a portion of Day Creek Boulevard east of Rochester Avenue. The purpose of this amendment is to accommodate the development of a' City sports_ park at the northwest corner of Rochester Avenue and Arrow K @g`.iway - AM: 229 - 011-05, 06, and 24 and 229 -. I 02135, 20, 28, 34, 41, 92, 44, 45, 53, 54, and 55. j PR5�ECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding a J Use and Zoning: North - Gaca t, Industrial Area Specific Plan (ISP) Sub -frea 7 (Industrial Park) East - Vauint, Industrial Area Specific Plan Subareas 7 (Industrial Park) and 8 (General Industrial) South - Roof4ng and Machine Shops, Industria. Area Specific Plan Subarea 8 (beneral Industrial) West - Vacant, Industrial Area Specific Plan Subareas 7 _ (I- Justrial Park) and 8 (General Industrial) D. General plan Designations - i Project Site - General Industrial North - Industrial Park South - General Industrial East - General Industrial and Industrial Park West - General Industrial and Industrial Park E. Site Characteristics; The site is level with a 2 percent � gradient from north•to south. The area of the proposed change Is currently under agricultural production with vineyards. There appear to be no significant cultural, historical, '%r scenic aspects to the immediate area, r 'ITEM F �_ 1 PLA14NING COMMISSION STAFi" REPORT EA F ISPA 90 -03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 12, 1990 Page 2 II. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has reviewed the Initial Study, ti I - 46 1 Part I, responses from Michael K. Schafer of Gillias, Pirc, Rosier, Alves, and completed the Environmental Checklist, Part II of the Initial Study and has foumd no significant adverse environmental impacts to occur as a result of the proposed Industrial Area Specific Plt- Amendment ?ISPA 90 -03). The impacts as a result of the Sports Park operations have been reviewed with a mitigated Negative Declaration byf the Park and Recreation Commission. III -. LAND USE ANALYSIS: The City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Redevelopment Agency have, started a process to develop a sports park complex at the northwOst corner of Rochester Avenue and Arrow Highway. The park. is to contain a 4,000 seat minor league baseball stadium, four additional softball diamonds, two soccer fields, and an animal shelter in conjunction with 1,345 parking spaces. The proposal is in conformance with the General Plan and the Industrial Area Specific Plana as both documents indicate the location of a future park near the :intersection of Rochester Avenue and Arrow Highway. The location and design of the proposed park requires the following adjistments to the Industrial, Area Specific Plan be considered: 1. The northerly portion of the park and stadium extends beyond the li-iits of Subarea 8 (General Industrial) into Subarea 7- fIndustrial Park) . Subarea 8 allows recreational facilities such as a stadium as a matte of- right, whereas Subarea 7 does not. Therefore, the request °s being made to adjust Subaree 8 northerly to provide that the stadium will be totally located within a land use classification which allows for major recreational facilities' The land in question is right an the General Plan boundary between Industrial Park and General Industrial. J,,signations, and the City Planner kas determined that the araa lies within the General Industrial designation. Therefore, a General Plan. Amendment is not required prior to considering the _:^dustrial Area Specific Plan Amendment application. 2. The extension of the site northerly along Rochester Avenue also blocks the planned extension of Da- Creek Boulevard westerly across Rochester Avenue to i;illiksn Avenue. Therefore, the application proposed the deletion of the Day Creek Boulevard extension between Rochester and Milli�Pn Avenues, and the adjustment of the future Day Creek Boulevard /Rochester Avenue intersection southerly from 'ts I presently plEnned location. I r`, 1 r f r ! r !:a PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EA & ISPA 90 -03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 12„ 1990 Ppge 3 IV. FACTS FOR FIN CINGS: Based on the facts and conclusions listed above, staff believes the Planning,_ Commission can make the following findings regarding this application`: 1. The property is suitable for the uses permitted In the proposed Industrial Area Specific Plan Subarea designation in tenors of- .access and size as evidenced by the findings and conclusions of the Initial Study traffic analysis; wind, 2. The proposed amendments would not have significant impa -ts on the envir! went nor the surrounding properties as evidenced by -toe conclusions, findings, and mitigation measures of the Initial Environmental Study; and 3. The proposed amendments are ie� conformar,ee with the General Plan and Industrial Area Specific P ",an due to the site's capacity to promote the goals and objectives for development of a park in the locatiop proposed in ea:h document. V. CORRESPONDEdCE: These item: have been advertised as a publi; hearing in the inland Valley 'Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted, and noticss,were sent to all property owners`withir 300 feet of the project site;, VI. RECOMMENDATION: If the Planning Comission concurs with staff's analysis, apd believes the proposed land use is preferable to the existing designation, it is recommended that the Planning Commission reccnmend a;rroval of Industrial Area Spvc,.fic Plan Amendment No. 90 -03 by ache adoption of the attached Resolution,. Resaec su ted, /Brad ity >anner BE,AW /jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Industrial'Arpl Specific . Plan Location Maps Exhibit "B" - Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment Map Exhibit "C ".- Site Plan Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment Resolution of Approval' �, ���■5 nn lk,its SuAt .T� qc ,k�s r f t GL1! � r. � _ ,fir ' • :.•ir ,� �e '�puW�4RY � d j sou &PAW ow sp 11111wil Ml AfMOW H W 0 lorly OF G _ UCAMONGA TM .E: E A PIJ. V Ri rA T ION : EXHIBili': SCALE: i t PESOLUTIOH NO. ;t A RESOLUTION Or THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO, 90 -03 TO ADJUST THE NORTHERN BOUNDARY" OF SUBAREA 8 ON THE WEST SIDE OF ROCHESTER AVENUE NORTHERLY 330 FEET, WESTERLY 1,065 i-ET, AND SOUTHERLY 330 FECT TO ITS PRESENT, BOUNDARY WITH SUBAREA 7; DELETE THE PLANNED EXTENSION OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD BETWEEN ROCHESTER AND MILLIKEI' AVENUES; AND REALIGN A PORTION OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD EAST OF ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229. - 011 - 05,,06, AND 24 ;MD 229- 021 -15, 20, 28, 34, 41, 42, 44, 45, 53, 54, AND 55, A. Recitals. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment No. 90 -03 (ISPA 90 -031 rs described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the alyplication." rii) On September 12, 1990, the Planning Commisstr,n of tle City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing of the application. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determinedv and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution c -e true and correct. i 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on. September 12,- 1990, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application relating to the Subarea 8, boundary aljustment applies to approximately 8 acres of land, basically a rectang�%]ar configuration, located on the west side of Rochester Avenue, approximately 1,300 feet north of Arrow Highway and is presently undeveloped with existing; vineyards. Said property is rurrently designated as Subarea 7; and i PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ISPA 90 -03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 12, 1990 Page 2 L <. J (b) The property to the north of the subarea adjustment ism designated Industrial Area Specifi.l: Plan Subarea r and is undeveloped with ' vineyards. Tae property to the west is designated Industrial Area Specific Plan Subarea 7 and is undeveloped with vineyards. The property to the east is designated Industrial Area Spec -'fic Plan Subarea 7 and is undeveloped with vineya ^ds. The prnperty to the soutt. is designated Industrial area Specific Plan Subarea 8 and is undeveloped with vineyards. (c) UP application elating to the deletion of the Day Creek Boulev� -d extension applies to approximately .73 miles of planned roadway between Rochester and Milliken Avenues; and the realignment of Day Creek Boulevard applies to approximately .25 miles on the east side of Rochester Avenue. i (d) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for.development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan ano with related development; and (e) This amendment promotes t`e goals and objectives of the Land Use Element and the Industrial Area Specific Plano and (f) This amendment would not be materially iriurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties_; 3. Based upon the substantial evicEnt .,resenteu to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing ar...- 5pon the specific findings rf facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as folio:vs: (a) That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access ani size, as evidenced' by the findings and conclusions of the Initial Study traffic analysis; and (b) That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the en.vironment nor the surrounding pr—crnrties as avide ;ced by i'ne conclusions, findings, and mitigation measures of the Initial Environmental Study; and (c) 'hat the proposed amendment: is in conformance with the General Plan and Industrial Area Specific Plan due to the site's capac =?u to promote the goals and objectives for development of a park in the location proposed .n each document. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the Project has been 'reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commissiow hereby recommends issuance of a =Negative Declaration. s; PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION hit. ISPA 90 -03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 12, 1990 Page 3 ,N 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forty, in paragraphs ` 1 2, 3, and 4 Dove, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, the Planning Commission of th^_ City of 'Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment No. 90-03 on this 12th day of September, 1990. G 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the ado'�,tion of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION r`F THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of 7ancho Cucamonga, do hereby , certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly intradreed, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of tde Planning Commission held on the 12t'a day of September 1990, by the following vote -to -Wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENi: COMMISSIONERS: AWL i l { CITY OF RANCHO GLTCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 12, 1990 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Caller, City Planner BY: Tom Grahn, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRAC1 14072 - C.T.K.. INCA . A residential subdiv ='sioR of 22 single family lots on 10.81 acres of land in the Low Reside -il district (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) loca *id at *he southwest corner of Highland Avenue and Jaspe; Street - APH: 201 - 212 -12. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approve' of the Tentative Tract Hap, Conceptual Grading Plan, and issuance of a negative Declzration. B. Project Density: 2.03 dwelling units per acre C. Surrounding Lvnd Use and Zonina: North - Single family residential; Law Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) South - Vacant (future Foothill Freeway); Lou Residential - District (2 -4 dwelling units ,er rr ) East - Single family residential under construction)'; Low Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) West - Latter Day Saints Church; Low Residential District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) D. General Flan Designations: Project Site - Low R< ,dential North - Low ResidE vial' South - Free%ay East - Low Residential West Lori Residential E. Site Characteristics: The site is - �.jrrently vacant and vegetation cons`.sts of native grass and weeds. Slopes within the :project's boundaries average five percent from.north to south. 2 M4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 1-.072 - C.T,K. INC. September 12, 1990 rage 2 II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is prop .-$itig a Tentative Tract Map consisting of 22 tots ranging in size from 9,749 square feet to 11,375 square feet witty an average lot size of 10,534 square feet (see Exhibit "B "). The tract was designed to continue the street pattern and lot configurations established with the development of Tract 12820 directly to the east. Eo product is being proposed at this time. B. Oesi ^ RevcEw Committee: On Jvae 21, 1990, thi Committee Chitiea, Tolstoy and Kroutil) reviewed the project and recommended.approval with the foltawing c-=ents: 1) The perimeter wail along Highland. Avenue should be designed to match the existing perimeter wall to the east (Tentative Tracts. 12820 and 13727). 2) -The freeway sound wall sho0i d be designed to match the existing freeway sound wall to the east (Tentative Tracts 12820 and 13727). C. Gra -ling and Technical Review Committees: The project was reviewed by both Committees and determined, with t'-'e recommended Conditions of Approval, to be in conformance with the applicable standards And ordinances, III. ENV IFONMENTAL ASSESSNEX,: tart I of the !"..tial Study has been cowpl eted by the applicant, staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist and no significant impacts on the environment are anticipated , a result 0 this project.. IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the General Plan and the L'evelopment CodA. The project, with the added . mitigation measures, will not be detrimental to the public health or safety or cause nuisance or significant environmeitaT' irip ts. In addition, the proposed site plan, ;together with the °-,s..nended Conditions of Approval, is in compliance with the ap =;icable provisions tf the Development Code and City standards. j V. "ORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised ri a Public Hearin& €n the Inland Valley_ Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has M 1.een posted, and notices have bear. sent to all property owners within 303 feet of the project site. VI. RECGMMENDATION: Staff recommends Ybat the F anning Commission apF'rcve Tentative Tract 14072 ttrougn adoptio;t of the attached Reaobetion and ,issuance of a Negative Declaration. 0701.02 �� 09--1 -9( PC Agenda 3 of r 0 0 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT e TENTATIVE TRACT 14072 C.T.K. INC. P September 12, 1930 ` Page 3 Res f5ne su , Bra Bui` City BB :TGs j s Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Subdivision Map Exhibit "C" - Grading Plan Exhibit "D" - Letter from Resident Resolution of Approval with Conditions i =' cs ar t a i . 1 « Lw j ss � �r � w { •• �. rr i n j .. 1 i � f •. 1 .w ! r ;. E! .. too IJ! avir"Wrn�l i ! �., rHMDN GA �j jj : cu .zw ,.: rru,N 1� asrr..� aa-r ar.•r .. � � F. ,..., �',. -- -- - - ---- --- - -- - � .. • .�. ,w:r1 ....fir � �„ •� .. �+ � . ,...f- � llRa[T rift ..O ,tpU>•.• f fP✓ OW .r11 `�/: �y 6 �y �'.�. OY OF UCAMONCA TaTY.E;UJIfi�s i.CCt�l2��,btii � 1 PLANNING �PJF ISION • `' EX MIT: SCALE: i � t �. I+ n � ■ e � M i ell .....E - QtN n q t r � a C 9 1 ; Ali lul -_ a �jSiia �.n �I v 1 i � t �. I+ n � ■ e � M i ell .....E - QtN n q t r � a C 9 1 ; Ali lul -_ a �jSiia �.n �I v t OZRZI ON 1DY81N { PII r It j t CIA �ytilil (j ` �ikT j t i °�, »I �• ° ! ! l �1 I r 'V. ay ' q�• _ " s c � 1 � t t: IllJl azr i � �C' —t 1 " ` { rA `e � • i�. ( J�= *1 �, } r..'I�II _ �;% •.e It 1` F �� + "- -1 tilil�'_1' •I�; =1 {J •� Q . 1 I; I . ' � ''l. •It t 1 � 1 t .1 � j �. 1 All s'! III I •.' �'� r�`: i a1,o; �e ._, `,`II,�. III _ •� �• ' � MMo P,01 L! iwr arcs `}I�..1 1� , s • a , f �! 7t, 3 � o0 9° 'a f l �R • s Ig left 'lilt 3 - - i 7t, 3 � o0 9° 'a f l �R • s Ig left 'lilt 3 �ico�vuree ¢ae�nrfur✓ e�Jrwrar Tf- ;Ao 1L VT 12, �u yAD l5d' � /G� lb3g rMp ass g' �lrr. s.�lA QP.tyrV e'��+ia'KC. CGY'�' AWW AUNAft .OW. ?c *r .0097= J= a "4 •rrc. rArrrec `s �- ®F C3 AiViCiNCgR nEm. TULE. Cif TloN PLA�dIril�d'�'s FSIQ1�I � w , EXMU. lJjj SCALE -. - - Mike Wirtz, 5405 Jasper Street.. r Rancho Cucamonga, C 0+ fiw A ` Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91724 September 2, 1990 To: Planning Commission From: Hike Wirtz - Homeowner Re: Tract # 14072 - C.T.K. Inca _ Dater September 2, 1990 This is in regard to the planned development on the southwest corner of Highland and Jasper Street. The concern over this project relates to thrq increased traffic that will be generated and the lack of speed controls at the intersection of Ja *per and Mghland; after completio of phase I and phase II developments on the south side of Highland Avenue between Sapphire and Carnelian. Attached is a letter I sent to the Public Safety Commission, regarding this problem. It is currently under review to determine if the installation of a four way stop sign is warranted. Once again I would like to re- emphasize my position regarding the safety element of this issue and strongly recomend the installation of a four way stop sign be a part of the Environmental Impact Report. If f Sincerely, i - Mike Wir Mike i 6486 jaszer Street Rancho "..cs.^.on;a,CA. 91,0,1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Charles Mackey Associate Civil Engineer 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. 91730 April 9,1990 Dear Mr. Mackey, I am a homeowner at 6486 Jasper Street who along with several of the neighbors are iconcerned about the traffic flow on Highland Avenue between Carnelian and Sapphire. The concern for this traffic flow has increased due to the proposed widening of Highland Ave. and the removal of the "dip" after the completion of the development on the south side of A&ghl and. Our concern relates to the" high speeds" which will result after the removal of the dip, as there are no stop signs between Carnelian and Sapphire therefore making this stretch of roadway a virtual "drag strip ". We are requesting the intersection at Jasper and Highland be changed from a one way stop (S /8) Jasper to a four way stop once the developmvt� is completed. We are concerned about this intersection because many of us have children and the above mentioned intersection is a major pedestrian route for children going to Jasper School. t I am very concerned about the potential of Highland Avenue becoming a "high speed" roadway and would appreciate a response to my letter regarding the plan of action the city if is going to take. ,1 Sincerely., RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO, 14072, AL RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 22 LOTS ON 10.81 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HIGHLAND AVENUE AND JASPER STREET IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2 -4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201-212 -12. A. Recitals, (i) C.T.K. Inc. has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 14072 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." (ii) 0!1 the 12th of September, 1590, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of tivis Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on September 12, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the southwest corner of Highland Avenue and Jasper Street with a street frontage of approximately 895 feet along Highland Avenue and a lot depth of 345 ,feet and is presently vacant; and (b) The eroperty to the north, south, east, and west is zoned for residential uses. The property to the north contains single .family residences, the property to the east contains single family residences that are currently under construction, the property to the west contains a church, and the property to the south is designated for the future Foothill freeway; and (c) The project, with the recommended conditions of approval complies with all minimum development standards of the City o Rancho Cucamonga; and f PLANNING COMMISSION :RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 14072 - C.T.K. INC. September 12, 1990 Page 2 (d) The prr�osed development of 22 siggle. family lots on 10.81 acres of land is consistent with the _Low Residential land use designation:of the General Plan. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission .!wring the above-referenced_ public hearing and upon the specific findings of ;! {lets set forth in paragraphs '1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:' (a) That tentative tract is consiste -nt with the General Plan, Development Code, and specific plans; and (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Crde, and specific plans; and (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development °oposed; and (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to hum ns and - ill- dl'ife or their habitat; and (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause sers.ous public L' health problems; and (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. Thi's Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by thi!,• reference. Planning Division: (1) Prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first, the applicant shall consent to, or participate in, the establishment of a Mello -Roos Community facilities District' pertaining to the project site to provide in. conjunction with applicable school district for the construction and maintenance of necessary school facilities. However, if any school district has previously established such a Community PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLU -IWN0. TENTATIVE TRACT 14072 - C.T.K. INC. September 12, 1990 Page 3 Facilities District, thz applicant shall, in the , alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing district prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. iturther, if the affected school district has not formed a Mello -Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months of the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. (2) Decorative block walls shall be required along Highland Avenue and all corner side yards consistent with Tracts 12820 and 13727 to the east. The location and design of the wall. shall be shown on the final Landscape Flan sdbjecl: to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. (3) A sound wall, as required the the acoustical analysis shall be installed along the south tract boundary. The wall shall be designed consistent with the sound AL wall provided for Tracts 12820 and 13727. (4) The drainRge overflow area, east of Lot 22, shall be landscaped to the satisfaction (of the City Planner and City Engineer. The pronosss, landscape improvements for the overflow area 'hai be fthown on the Landscape Plan. ' (5) A final acoustical analysis shall be required to identify necessary mitigation measures to reduce the noise level within the residences to 45 CNEL. The report shall be subject to City Planner review and _ approval prior to the issuance of building permits. Engineering Division: Q1) A permit will be req,,iired from M.W.D. for any work within their right-of -way, (2) Install "No Stopping Any Time" signs along the Highland Avenue frontage. (3) Caltrans shall deed the excess state ;property at the southwest- portion of the site to the Developer prior to recordation of the final map. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 14072 - C.T.K. INC. September 12, 1990 Page 4 (4) Provide sufficient catch basin capacity upstream within Jasper Street so that a total Q100 is contained within the pipe south of Highland Avenue. (5) The drainage overflow area east of Lot 22 shall be reconstructed and landscaped for City maintenance to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The overflow capacity shall be limited to the capacity of the most downstream sump catch basin. Also, .openings in the south wall shall be provided for drainage. (6) It shall be the Developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone A designation removed frfA the project area. The Developer's Engineer shall /irepa;,e .all necessary reports, plans, hydrologic hydraL'ic calculations, etc. PreTiminary approv l shall be obtained from FEMA prior to approval of the record map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first' The designation shall be officially removed prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. 6.. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Br' . Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller,. Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Cotrorission held on the 12th day of September 1990, by the following vote -to -wit- AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: j ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 1 ' L7 j 11 �7 L�ACNyV.D�YS. 44 ~^ LiR^y. OwV L P uN^ 40 WA C.YC O CV 34�LL 4W ~� NY�UpsW. �pw Q.Y LhYy gY M NLa> ■� Q� MY y4 C vL 4 Y 4 M' V~ M 6 YNy A'. u 1y. G .Yid Yw»i { a L O y y A y w M Cam. tlCQOYY_be � �M Y .0 L FpV tzt: r ^ybt4 �i�u ,S.NO Y,.. cE: c� YnY -' Ya Y a.. a. � �.. se g a rC •'.c ^oa.°i. ga'�e..a*c"" «�^LY �� °c uY�a«M.N.7aw ~� vY'g.4n ar`o c °�~� 7rtii yy�$N^ gf's ^, yaLE:�r,Q u"aa VrN' .644.^N L_�aY.nyu Ow Pa^Y CY�eH a�r % =.SN co Y ^} o V GW O^ Y dOLP w ^� b>.a�N •d b 0 PNV�N N.w yY NIA w� Q �w� uNU a4 Qp opT. aY. �.=,ay- atc:i ts- -t i er:N4avw 3� .2's YY >c oo -Te pJy w M ^ ---9 6y e��" evzN rva s46 k CVV �W N w w^ M F V D P In• O M d Y Y 0 u Y C� SGqq^wY�C >YaYwyr ' ^NF ��� Gc�°w�Y O i1M x V Y L L ^T G 4� > Ni{ ? C Y N 4 yY L�:^ t _N N Y C O 4 y y'C C V S O ^ Y Nc 4^ P 4 7 ay° i r >. Y w Kim M l V' C P M P V 4 x O T N p r r Q a S Y yQ3�. W Vt D u R a t 'Y tiU •� h ^I 6 y$Z pV Big 01 O� p d M f p A Mme« r h u it N� i Y �l V we C O r N ~� r tiU •� h ^I Z 18.2 Sa Z. ^ y Y = NLLa. cMq Yt�he L4Cy N�o� a 3.. ocIL S.°..ow 'us .vi t « C N q q^ N N� 4yY •w 43-1 c" qq�o a ^o�{6c1 .^- a.oiysy�v qVC°C AYeGU N^'C�a O�N1i v. lw L QY.GN y�y)YG'MG L °y ■yeOy Y COC •'•O�Af�YOM�i� Opt L„D• LYA ^ O 4 Wow.: �wyY �a q r •� N^ VALO N O y {� V; .5 w YYY.G� V ■■ L 06 L Y�y typ 4Y N L L L�EEEO Y.q I[ =�6Y cNYY•S �r3NNiSrfiHVV H H ^ oC L A }qt}�yy �•" V c 4 G nS a 3. l.�TdN TL M� G i. w L S e.S L O•.OeyYN w�4 1 �L,VA 9 '.LN. O••�Sr eIL YY� Y • ✓O1F• Nc w a i—y` cg° .12!"i c9c ^Y LNVa Zm S.. W_ O 01 ~YY MO Y °v4>N8s N yCL C E. ■w ^CO.S``. °0i ►r aC°� O r 4 y 3 ^_s C K- N M Y «S a WS =. 's I G < i R S 3 N 6 6 G N A Iff u A VOY 3•L O -- �u.N- C' N <yry 1." YOc4N AO YY p< 7 —yyu �w wt,)� ^...- V •. S `.c''SVL+OU..u« yaq$ —naC■ ``�ia yn ,N 4`�O VSyyL --aN w 4 °4: s` s1_ � HMO MY ,••' GO C` °'L•N a�M C L`y OAi G{ ■C�ONa q...�c{Lt Y L • _ _ 1.8- Y. O M'^ so C gj .LC4 �yy �. � Fu+ 3.5 Z p q L G y £uC yayG� ` 4 yy CL N r• Y +.yL�j •Uu QqV iw= NL wO C'L a0'r•°+ 6^ U'u'S Map L. CY ~Y.`•rCC^ N +. "Y` CO yC'i� c 4' N Y r V S IF c LL" O^ q d �` V NOtJC 4s ��A C.�Cq gMYy �C ..�I.5 •� ^V M.liz UtN _'. r EY M r N V -a. 3— \` Y T V C G q C S S` r 4 Y .293. . a t-4; rL S > G ' •• L> 4 �w F N� C W�� f M+ t+ S� ° c Y Err O• G. ' a y p �`j. N M Ga—.V LO `0� 'BYO {�4rM y iZ° CY ^Cq Q�sLp�t ��LCY yN '�pMnq.> L^h tU yNN >NO• L,O •W ,TY ,i LCO OI Oq NYCC C C2;Y O•G C 3 =yaw YV. rtYY ` Y— M`QC�Yq 1A Y ..J6 =w MT ^sr0 3 —YS a4ii qqq` Yc ..MC V�1+ CG�pI- i1aV ■cV■ OC t•S ^ ^OC v 60. Oa N gaSY ^Sw ■ �-N.H' O� gYO..11 pw`vaiY� NZ a NS Vw� 5�. C H O c.M MwY.��6y �+S Yy.Si'L St .2 �$. tr °C.�'�iit•«, «a,°MwoN :.$_�`3N,A ^a v« 3=i urd M. e.a.'ri ,� yu ^Y C'YV'6 ~`�G c`°��.. a . G +o g N'« Ya T V N�+ O OtlgY Oi `SC ,G1r `{ YLO YYLU� `M ppLp f�••M qM '•bY\.•L _4 ,G�OM 01My f`i /Si V V.Y OL r pO1�4µp O1►�90 f°iy��M —yp V�`1OGL�O E Sy�r S O G +a ; _W .. O Y Lp: ► Y .. V V LLL «'« tTI Q Gyy yA 4.. p, 4 gY �y°• 9 yY N L4 .0 Oy r yYO. <9 LL° �.1 FL"a_MO < ^Ma N,X,I <Y .p O t1 r .N. � .`.• C E E H O �qM� % d c% Sa ^ M RTd r Q q b C q.E O1"-b22 Y^ T O 4 9' 6 CT Zua2 'LL q T O easyy. NL GY 0 w1 N N qb �C V C L `b CC GGy Ng 0 O O y ✓ LgO'LUW� 5 Y . . 0z S9- p 4 0 y Ca Y Q � :GO a p A ✓ » 41gr Yb N� ✓ V L ^' M q Y 7 � _ qWy Z.02! N4oco l CYO 8-a Ep U�LpC+ L ✓V q'N ws+q eb OOOV Y..j'A q^ NN V a�VS� 040C'N .c U.yON ^ ✓Y 'uaYti. 5CgN LL.N D LL Sl f�i.Y CN,.q T� O UV� Zu.. 00^NO4'C i^.,. L �A ✓Tr Ob Ar CNAN w°.eU L A111 q q 3m ,,Nyy q` C Y 1- p~ c g C U M C �q uY N� (I` 00 Y�O R 4qC aq u�T' Q b yN✓ pr TWA C1Ctl to LCC L✓ b.�1?VWfy N�VT L✓■ ✓YOgO C✓ C b •! L Ny m Az Y.N N C A b A l V� O CC q ✓' O N da Lib. L GC 5Z - LpV v n n N W � Y b c- s N l T dN 01H N Y A N i ✓ iCL L q 6111 M 1 N A q N Y R 9 9J y~ L V 9° N L° V P Cf' ' g C N a G: °M p r N }� ✓ p ° „Y Y. L 4 q u� Q ~ 4 Y Y L QN G L C Q✓ .�( Cq YZ g 4 N W q wl�C 0 9 0 0 r 4 L. 4 C 5 u `�d4 M 0' Y 0T ti �qV GMYL °�riC..a.: 6A�pYO N 0 N b ~a 4 0y ✓ y n+ L M 5 L N.7A {�..V o �w NN V 9 O.E {y�, �. dpG Y CNd F yyc t y NUG d N °LNVGd'�.d C4 Y U N4 >plp�5 ZY Vt� C M.�i.q LGN! L N NeCpN ■ N q !N C d M N a[N 3N0 hNL pC O L O O� �[N Vr U >01.ANQO Vc y 6q�'PG !Y k096N fT ova a°aLi� oc as c uor$c Tr cNi i'u `�awv ag t•1 _= a'cc o0 r k 4 o tt cao �rca TaYN NAG D. ✓ VN N OY MCCY O•.✓ y✓ � EVE t� LO'016q ✓C N 01 r q y NL L M 4 t 4dz^ G 5 y �+ N 7^ a O 1. y i r 7�u« Va c p Nqy4. Z. a 5 7y L v C ✓✓ d ,p w q p N O1y. * Q�~ O N .p 4 t ✓= YoEw cma�yy U ^. rst �✓ Y qy .... c�b'pyr NN�q qT �'§�_. O� TaMM Np eggy ¢yy RUZZ- �y0 L to CilC 99 L a L. C�NC �� V AI - U w V ^A■ b 8 N w� L t �1F w r ✓. r. wp L Tit n. p m L N° q p04T �y y� �441YL ryy SgYN Z. rz ®tl0Y d 154 �T �4L't N TNY l y,Mt Nb N4y �C QY MO =� Zr Ky Ltl Y ay w d0 &0=8 N.W 41��N c . qr `✓ Y V v N y. p V q D. 4 y C W C M se LL C. �' o q 5, O 4. qY y y N L .. 'Y✓ _ •t. yY .. Y✓ oSigeC'oa 0 4 w✓ L� O C w ^ q U M� ±. y G~ OiYZ q Y s p y n R 0.-Z. ggrJY P G,�­N V _..°9 YyyU N` �V uC.- i!! ♦.O p1pa b P� 40 ✓Og40. YY � O y C r i Ge�iT L 'Z N� _L ✓qU Y C = t yCj �'i^DC L Y�� OY'OG LQ ,.-c bgy4 i G. �- C `4 LC ^" YOV a�: COY Ay�T /} L ✓'� Y �C yy 9wy ilOq L M >rqC>pr��j1 ��t �r ` 4�9` Y Y��Lp. ■ L4� .- 1GMM0 l9WW i r.y R t,+, T .w Y <(i !b °.. N.r6 tC .N. YG ++a 1. W f' rl.6 `wG OMN�� Vi T N M R 111 .O a � tY ci ��,,,_ Boa wN v v w C C N N q L B C ^ U w y O O' qN� p > i E =Q o a�� a G y 6 V A YAE ~ C 9 6 N O E C > G�pwp a w rJ' a x�� =e u Y N U G t y U M OIr�O ODw Yq� .Ni K. »La o�ovu try. U �q YCyE _ �ce ua « 2 ♦ •Ys y�OE ^�Y..i « wC F� r�L $yw°• 9Cd c�d $�c� wge \1d � Y OIUL g 11 Y O U N G6. Q L y w « w« M N r � vNi V �. io °A �'ao Spy 'm =.e OM ^�pQ1p/ «G OS wUV ^ L. 1199 qN QsSBic y09. OS .Cd ~ c: 51. V.GNUY CL Ap ^« z �G �!U cwi0 u M Y{�wY-E Gg 1 g°ae YWVL GYM N.w� U ^vcon Na�L a�ris$ « p Go601N N UrC 2 L E CN S� q Y. « OI « Gy■^ V w � Y Y E N C jYb! C� G U• A Y C a A,G O O F�f.>W.L Y { 1 Li 6atbN y nw p S �SE a«w O w 0�� OeYiK L��m L. LO I LNN CAC O d F 6 G E qq0 0 SEE i L n i N Y O. r N N Cp � �' Boa wN v v w C C N N q L B C ^ U w y O O' qN� p > i E =Q o a�� a G y 6 V A YAE ~ C 9 6 N O E C > G�pwp a w rJ' a x�� =e u Y N U G t y U M OIr�O ODw ^ UO � Ut �li d OI }yNBC D c 2w ' ^W « 2 ♦ •Ys :5 we « wC F� pj 6 O C \1d OV LK g 11 Y O U N G6. Q L y w « w« M N r OI� L ^CQ.� w0 «GNaO� eYa 1�M w a IL 2-2 CU ~ WC wY@ U GdV ^ OS � ®ttVrV 9V w Ap ^« z �G �!U cwi0 u M Y{�wY-E Gg 1 g°ae ^ N G Yo N.w� U �Y1 Y1U^ jG N 'pg p Go601N J -w0::.p NNNV �C.:r E CN S� pG�y�C N L w O I L U C G A,G O O F�f.>W.L Y { 1 Li 6atbN 0s w+Gl N �. 6Ua O N I.f \Or G ^ M 14 N 'A D c 2w ' ^W « 2 ♦ •Ys :5 we « wC F� 6 O C A O g 11 V L Y G T iN C eI 8 Y N N a s 0� Cp � �' �G L iq. i�. • � �� Yy i G q p Q Y Y 6 y �qq C v. W N A N �[ v V— E.��i YS ,o r�$.� oY'u GYq z�or5 ;' CC L 9 ^N ^N ■4 «OOiJ 9LM� 01 NGM OprV ^ 6SUy oSEI. GSY G« 01° ® fill VAC aq CAL. as LY�jC OS� C q i O q0. �Yf' E 0y� L C' GOw C1 pc ■� St N c.p�.Y°i w C E C VAY�4 w C `.L V�f j® yo YN �44 t.— j7!Y��CY7U Y o ° AaA C U - L. R> NEYt.M G 9O 6 mot. y.. p p Co tu�L O L Y . M L S» COf ^}.5 aL. \� ^ K F -- ,GY.° 6N q ^ss L ®S _ �. „. OVN� ESp V IoL YmL +.0 Ye yC yC..V O^ 6..Y Y M 14 N 'A t CY LOI tT LO14 A GYY 4G A OWLCQ M@A LOY N OI^ C� � O� N CM�p L4 L y. Y�� M4VyN 010�LH G^ q ■3 � _M OI�CO C 4.�O..e y. OY. ^01 �C V iYC. Y CCCQr EM � a VMVO Y{143 Vy�L y.6 `.1 r 3iz @G�k c a >g@ v �v... °' mw rc a y4 y ■ o +�4a ns 7L SBI fd @C °L ^M U. H {Q� pNtY �iV _ is �`Mq'6 �O� pl'4WeW 0��� y' ♦�nCLM L Y^ N ^.s C�}1 y�1p Vy4 Gy OI4 ^6 NaO� 4GYUYi W.d Y GNC 4a Sq k O b qp�� „q0 C6�L^ iG 'E wC4 HYis[a� T:° «OON$$$$$6 cuY ^ 4 «pC La"° 1Est: aVl '�Op �{�{1i 0 dpi w � giNnO� vr7 y4 Q >,[yrY4 o[LI `a pc O^.G.'gp �i41L6 qs. ^M YIM C y^y0i . °tN `. 6vGOw. Y�YQ1L1 ALq �T}$911d4 N� 9 ^p G: L C■�1pGGJp3.aaGGr,� �G -i YL ?VGVp w..o ^q��V dS.H.. P� V �Zp °A[ YCy. ^Y=C v A H 1U N.� Q' AO M Y 4. Q. ow C°� L Y S er = ~SY, i° yu VI.GCA �. L �..e. C mac. �ay�0 4 Sp' O� M 1• L t1` O�. - •.� 2 NOGr' ICV O C °NvV a Y p 9 p m U q • 4 ) 4 G _`• V HN O {A1 Vp !LI y p, y E !: V V C G G`a 1� G C 01 N AE r ertD C lim °' "qnz asc �i� `e'^ cccq: a. aq AIM— a La..�.. NCQ ^.Li@ q qr N4 �ILgYgwN ' [[nL ■Ha °cam Er`•L.. �o n.. w s A ti w[ry wuu �a ca�ma a« aa[ggLr <e51$ 1=� � Q •� .p.sz nN U�a� may° � N � si"•^�ir My1 =SOywe- yV YAY r � C O i9 Na L @fleet OIOM p° V D wCJ Ny.0 $ '> 4 O icO Q 'MC yM�((/ p It p 0 IZA .a ao oN Tl- 4sE1y.IC.°. H-2sy q LLN ¢� C� �Y bsT 4NeCNGp @w^=. •T 0= _.zzt W OM q �M` L d 4 p 4 a V LypL C G a O. pY O 4 N� O N�y! °q9 �]Cj! Y.qN N. A 9 4 pu ._E D uap ^qv q^ o": p��/ I 11 C@, N.. J> O IL GLV �AV O {Y d}e S`�^ .o �qp ^.Cp e ` G rW Y O O b rW A q N.qS L:O Rp .�1 4 O N�wggL V�Y Y GgCr �C p.� A.N V ^4"q �9�Y ^R @ «r ia.cau iouuooe a v °iP m. u� .- p= xw ap.�o -- 'o- •n F- u Uo[� 1• q � N - f.1 4 Y3 .D A w � t CY LOI tT LO14 A GYY 4G A OWLCQ M@A LOY N OI^ C� � O� N CM�p L4 L y. Y�� M4VyN 010�LH G^ q ■3 � _M OI�CO C 4.�O..e y. OY. ^01 �C V iYC. Y CCCQr EM � a VMVO Y{143 Vy�L y.6 `.1 r 3iz @G�k c a >g@ v �v... °' mw rc a y4 y ■ o +�4a ns 7L SBI fd @C °L ^M U. H {Q� pNtY �iV _ is �`Mq'6 �O� pl'4WeW 0��� y' ♦�nCLM L Y^ N ^.s C�}1 y�1p Vy4 Gy OI4 ^6 NaO� 4GYUYi W.d Y GNC 4a Sq k O b qp�� „q0 C6�L^ iG 'E wC4 HYis[a� T:° «OON$$$$$6 cuY ^ 4 «pC La"° 1Est: aVl '�Op �{�{1i 0 dpi w � giNnO� vr7 y4 Q >,[yrY4 o[LI `a pc O^.G.'gp �i41L6 qs. ^M YIM C y^y0i . °tN `. 6vGOw. Y�YQ1L1 ALq �T}$911d4 N� 9 ^p G: L C■�1pGGJp3.aaGGr,� �G -i YL ?VGVp w..o ^q��V dS.H.. P� V �Zp °A[ YCy. ^Y=C v A H 1U N.� Q' AO M Y 4. Q. ow C°� L Y S er = ~SY, i° yu VI.GCA �. L �..e. C mac. �ay�0 4 Sp' O� M 1• L t1` O�. - •.� 2 NOGr' ICV O C °NvV a Y p 9 p m U q • 4 ) 4 G _`• V HN O {A1 Vp !LI y p, y E !: V V C G G`a 1� G C 01 N AE r ertD C lim °' "qnz asc �i� `e'^ cccq: a. aq AIM— a La..�.. NCQ ^.Li@ q qr N4 �ILgYgwN ' [[nL ■Ha °cam Er`•L.. �o n.. w s A ti w[ry wuu �a ca�ma a« aa[ggLr <e51$ 1=� � Y N i a N Y LL4 � A C {u� ^da0 YON ^4 C° ^ G O ^N ws ■pp■ tiW L�1� r .2 : a L Wow o N a L E Y ^ L a IN y rU r ma ♦ G � T 4 E d N � y°� N Y. O1 p O • «a°iw ° e N 7ICt !°. D I G QUA ^ • 3 e G^ 1 'E <e !. ^ v w°. 5 YU Y� �,4 �� C ■0 4. G b c! 00 t O Y O Q ~.eNt V L� Q1. J2O y4 M YW �Np� YG h • cc He �N gs gj �A GOO O Y Y CLO 9 E C.. 0� 4 Wm V NLAO e d iy °EQ Y 9 V A O yy«_ Q 6 V�u y � ~rty Gpp. °4. N W ro�C N Y N W pL GY 01A ^ 6 qML d « Q ° 0L rvy N Q -to ^_ Y kz A^W �C N° 4y.0 «OS. N± •6'� iy fe°?I •JM Y .15 P. 1 V C E D O Y.a«Cbi L« ^w. S N:E�dM �. u ^n °q LL Yo NO Y� N -1 nL •C Ll Dr WY�N E E. =6 yV t,•b°. C N O rV co CI 4 w 4 ,�.i i Y N i a N Y LL4 � A C c U41o� ^ v ?L u v ^N ws o3 °G _ r .2 : a L Wow o N a L E Y ^ L a IN y rU r ma small O1 �Y0 en �-Z ° c o« 7ICt !°. c a fh -°i 1 ; N� !. ^ v w°. 5 YU Y� �,4 �� C ■0 4. G b c! 00 t O Y O Q ~.eNt V L� Q1. N Cq N e 'N'.. Yi U cc He ■yc. i�aE Wri ° VV7 C,L V a-lull U41o� small en 1 avia �« q U L L v ^ ra o o °i A , Y. °a dy q a d Q ° y , ° A O L ^ Y O N d 4 d C W l p EY^ $l y i 4ye. �y 6y LA E 9 e Y � Y N +'Ea de s 'c�v LLU C Y O1. Q y 0 1•• N YW K Q N z Ay�y �' nO E'rA«r d 'ono L �.. ^�YE NE°La pJ gw�4�( Y y.° Y L Y Y '� �Yrr vi QGi Y. A A L N Y G ^� VVY'^ a l 4e ^N^ ppi e y« 2= Y$ g aoo s Y a g Off° i45 Pel 's ry e L Y _0'R Y. Q »= P s�� °Yves ��Hd a.. 7G +LypQJ NI�C G°W i t K 0.eJ a' �-�� -,�2 7) Em qYCC. � O °LN q L O O L NV b � at Y V Gv� w^ v u � s'i c goo a r O Oar Y ~ G � yr� N C a i ^L N L DYO u a ud� x u �oS �y O C�O� • YCO pLp. �l�.r ..Gq. M 4 CM^ C.L YD L 1. 'NY yCy C +O'lfiN M L Y A A aa a me '.SoN •°. .'nuW V s u artg .qG -�.L. 33 P-0 N L V O A O N ° C 1. C D° i 0� a N °• Y.° N O b w. O O C� yy pp `O Y is- Y =LyO}5yn� Y.C� 2CYL O ° CZW gaVV Z 4U �y GO w � YV �M YO 6 q � ✓CC�Y JOL «p C^ L N C■ Y �uu Q C Y O SYY { °r4 7tl �bY ysYG Y. �. y` p� aY Nn.O4 �^ 15 C L N O a� Y Y V Lv. Vu .o a CA ..duY 4 p y999■ \V g G ,pq9 r OI N L 6� W y U Y p y y C.3 V r Y J V C 2=4 tee § x^ Y : � L L^ �� E.M. is 'oL�.c' LLo^ C,Cw .: +'�{${�� «N.'e ,,YCL� !N FNd i� lW a-5 K"L ONrW MYT b RL I-� �. GJA2 &am Iowa V � DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT September 12, 1990 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer Betty A. Miller, Associate Engineer MODIFICATION TO TENTATIVE TRACT 13527 WATT INLAND EMPIRE - A request to m airy a condfi; on of approval requiring private :maintenance of interim drainage protection facilities by a Homeowners° Association for a residential subdivision of 231 single - family tots on 100.48 acres of land in the Low Resident'.al District (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) located at the northwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street (APN: 225 - 071-65) I. BACKGROUND: The tentative tract was approved by the Planning ;Commission on September 28, 1988. Design Reviews_ on the first four of five project phases are scheduled for review by the Planning Commission two weeks from tonight. Repetition of one of the applicable tentative tract conditions on those Design Reviews prompted the modification request. The developer is requesting that the condition requiring that interim drainage protection facilities be maintained by a Homeowners' Association be revised, by substituting the word "Davel'oper" for "Homeowners' Association ". His request letter is attached as Exhibit "C." II. ANALYSIS• The subject condition, number 15 of Planning Commision Resolution No. 88 -200, reacts as follows: 15. Interim drainage protection facilities shall be pr,ov(ded along the north project boundary. The design shall be justified by the final drainage study and approved by the Cit- Engineer. A maintenance agreement shall be executed to the satisfaction of tae City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing private maintenance of the drainage protection- facility by a Homeowners' Association, but-providing the City with the right - of- access to- maintain the facility if private maintenance .s insufficient and allowing the City to assess those costs to the Homeowners' Association. ITEM H PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TT 13527 - WATT INLAND EMPIRE SEP'. ASER 12, 1990 PAGE 2 The intent of thr condition was to insure that interim drainaq'a facilities would be privately maintained. The original developer indicated that a homeowners' association was planned for the project, which provided a convenient mechanism for that maintenance. The property has now changed hands and the new developer, Watt Inland Empire, does not wish to create a homeowners° association, Watt has expressed willingness to enter into a maintenance' agreement consistent with the condition. They feel that'" 1. The City will have more leverage with a developer than with a homeowners`asseciation and 2. A developer will be motivated to honor the 'greement due to their' substantial financial investment= which, can only be recovered by attracting home buyers. The primary concern of :staff is assuring that private maintenance will continue if the project chars" hands again and once the lots are sold. The maintenance agreement must be designed to run with the Tand. With this in -!ind, Staff does not support the Developer's specific request,- but is willing to consider other alternatives. . Staff could support a modification which adds the following wording "or ,other entity acceptable to the Ci ty Engi neer and Ci tar Attorney" after Homeowner!? As" ;ti -3ti on to the condition in question. This will provide staff and the be"veloper the opportunity to explore other alternatives. IV. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission cor:sider all input and elements of the modification request and direct staff to prepare a resolution reflecting the Commission's decision on the issue. The resolution will be placed as a Consent Calendar item on the next available Planning Commission agenda. Respectfully submitted, - Barrye Hanson Senior Civil Engineer BRH:B'M: jh Attachments: Vicinity Map (Exhibit "A ") Tentative Tract Map (Exhibit "B ") E Request Letter (Exhibit "C") f s v rr 'BFI �V Y { tt Ll t m 1 uj LF 1 ` L? A �i � W C WATT 1— ]L D E.i2PIRE, INC. 9035 HAVEN AVE., SLO. 2. STE, 102 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 ,7 141 989.5663 . FAX 17141 944.5868 August 1, 1990 City of Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 Betty Miller Engineering Division Re: Tract 13527 (condmod) Dear Betty, 't. /;U G t IQ0'D CITY of RANC10 CUCA!0rlea OGINEERING DIVISION r I felt our Technical Review meeting >n a'uly 31 went very well ov <,:-:all. Most of the conditions were fine, iiilzh the exception of a few minor items that we felt needed clarification or a modification to the original conditions. The first item, special conditions B.3., states the interim drainage facility is to be maintained by a homeowners association.' As we Oiscussed in the meeting, this development w?h not have an ssociation. Please consider this letter a request for a modification to the conditions. At this time Watt would like to substitute "Developer" in lieu of "Homeowners Association." for this and any other references to a homeowners association in the Conditions cf Approval The responsibility for maintenance will remain with the developer and (j the City will still have in place, an executed agreement, which in reality, will be much easier to enforce. The second item is condition B.5. it was brought up and discussed, that this condition requires that the FIRM Zone D de --gnation be officially removed from the project prior to occupancy improvement acceptance. It also requires a preliminary approval from FEMA prior to approval of the record map or issuance of building permits. Watt feels this condition is unreasonable due to the span of time required when working with the Federal Government Chen takes 2 years. Watt respectfully requests to amiend the condition to require "preliminary" approval from FEMA be required prior to occupancy and that flood insurance wiil be required for structures within the Zone D designation until the designation maps are officially changed,. The insurance requirment will be part of the sales disclosure statement. dak A- WATT ENTERPRISES COMPANY. PAGE 2 The third item is B.13, a condition which requires pedestrian bridges be t constructed across the trapezoid chazinel. Watt has agreed to construct the brid-3s, however, because of the future modification of the Phase v map, the alignment of the Pasec +s cannot be guaranteed. Watt suggests this condition be changed allowing the construction after the map *nodifieation for Phase V is complete. The last item, B.15, requires a lot line adjustment along the northe,xn property line prior to the Final Map recor':ietion. This condition shoi;id bn changed to read "Concurrently with reco;; d;yLion of the Final Map' =, as agreed to in previous m_etings with the City. Those are all the comments I have. -Please- let me know if there is anything further -you- need from me, sincer ly, ar Lewis ector of Development i Encl: Condition B.3. Condition B.5. Condition B.13. Condition B.15. cc: Bob King, Entec Bike Parker, Land Plan Design CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT , DATE: September 12, 1990 -� TO: Chairman a,id Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer Steven Hayes, Associate Planner SUBJECT: MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT RNIEW 89 -14 - AMPAC INC - A request to modify conditions of approval relating to the timing of on- and off -site improvements for a previously approved project consisting of two manufacturing buildings totaling 26,000 square feet on 39.3 acres of land in the Heavy Industrial District (Subarea 15) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at 12167 Arrow Route - APN:. 229- 121 -15 (Continued from August 22, 1990) I. ABSTRACT: The applicant is requesting a modification to several conditions of approval from the original Resolution of Approval for the project regarding the timing of street improvements, storm drains, landscaping, utility undergrounding, and walls (soe Exhibit "A "). These conditions are highlighted in the attached Resolution No. 89 -132. II. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission originally approved this project on October 11, 1989. The approval included development of a 21,200 square foot dry cast manufacturing building and a 4,800 square foot open air metal "cage" shop. Dense perimeter landscaping, walls and fences ..ere also required to screen the outdoor pipe storage areas from Arrow Route and the Devore _ Freeway. Also required were �:onstruction of a Local storm drain connection from the Day Creek Channel to the project site and dedication of a public storm drain easement for the purpose of allowing the Metropolitan Water Distric't to complete a water discharge line along the northwest property line. Both of these conditions were to be completed prior to building occupancy. III. ANALYSIS: In order to address the proposed modification request properly, it should be separated into two categories: 1. Public improvement Issues: As noted earlier, the Developer is requesting to omit and /or modify several Engineering Conditions from the adopted Resolution No. 85 -132, which relates to the timing and /or M ITEM I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT - l DR 89 -14 - AMPAC, INC. September 12, 1990 Page 2 completion of public improvements .s the Day Creek Channel and Metropolitan Water Discharge line across Arrow Route. Essentially, the applicant is requesting to occupy the new buildings prior to completion of the following 'public improvements; A. The westerly portion of the Arrow Route street improvements. B. The undergrounding of utilities along Arrow Route and along the rest project boundary. C. The storm drain from Day Creek C'nannel to the site along the projeet's south boundary and within the Southern California. Edison easement. It should be noted that City Council Resolution Ho. 88 -557 requires that final occupancy will not be granted for all the buildings until all public improvements are completed and accepted per the required CoOitions of 10roval. Any variance to this adopted Resolution will v,%quire formal approval by the City Council; hence, the Planning 'omission can only make a recommendation to the Council. The deferral of the westerly portion of the Arrow Route street improvements and the utility unde.uroundin relate to the future Metropolitan Water District pipe line project scheduled to begin construction in December 1990 with completion within 9 months. The pipe line will cross through the northwest portion of the site on a diagonal alignment conflicting with the street improvements and utility undergrounding. The Dev? :per plans to occupy his building in October 1990, considerably ahead of the Metropolitan Water District project. The Developer feels it would be wasteful to install the street improvements now then have them- removed again within a few months by the Metropolitan Water District. Also,_ the developer feels that it would be unfair to withhold his occupancy until the MWD project is completed. The Developer did not request the deferral of the utility undergrounding, but staff feels it would be at least a nuisance to underground the utilities to be in conflict with the pipe line. Therefore, if the street improvements are to be deferred, then the undergrounding should be deferred also. Staff does not feel it is a good general practice to defer the completion of improvements until after Occupancy, - because occupancy is the best control tae City has in assuring completion of improv- meets. Howaver, due to the unusual circumstances in this case, staff feels an exception is ";fie warranted if the Developer provides a cash deposit far; improvements. For informational purposes, staff has prepared 11 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT OR 89 -14 - AMPAC, INC. September 12, 1990 Page 3 a condition of approval recommending the deferral of street improvements and undergrounding until 90 calendar days following the completion of the Metropolitan Water Distri project subject to a cash deposit and City Council approval.. The Developer has also requested the deferral of the storm drain along the south project boundary until completion of the Day Creek Channel project. This issue was discussed during the Design Review Committee meetings. Staff still feels the line can be constructed up to Day Creek Channel and the final connection deferred and completed by the Da- Creek project if necessary. The Developer is also requesting that the dedicatioi of non- vehicular access along Arrow Route to the City be deleted since commercial or industrial projects require that any additions or changes to an approved site development plan be reviewed by the appropriate permitting division and the opportunity is there to evaluate a proposed vehicular access, Dedication of non - vehicular access to the City is consistent with Engineering Division Policy. Staff feels it is appropriate to take the access rights along Arrow Route, except for the approved driveway, because the driveway AML location is consistent with current City policy, The of dedication of access rights formally serves notice that the City has reviewed the access locations and determined that additional driveways are not acceptable. 2. On -site Landscaping and Wall Issues. Adjacent to the required storm drain connection across the south property line, a dense screen of a Leylandii Cypress trees will be installed, per Special Condition No. 4 of the adopted Resolution No. 89 -132. The applicant is requesting to defer the planting of this tree screen until the storm drain connection can be constructed to the completed Day Creek. Channel, which is anticipated to be complete through this section within the next 6 to 12 months. However, the Industrial Specific Plan Section IV.A.6 requires that sereening of storage areas from areas of public view (streets, trails, etc. 1 be provided prior to outdoor storage commencing. If this landscaping is not planted, then the site, which is primarily an outdoor storage facility, would remain highly visible to vehicles traveling northbou..j on the Devors Freeway. This storage yard is currently a legal non- conforming use.- However, conditions were imposed on the development of these buildings to screen the storage activity. Also, the applicant is requesting to defer the landscaping and decorative screen wall along the western half of the Arrow Route streetscape until the `Ietropolitan Water District has T-3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 89 -14 - AMPAC. INC. September 12, 1990 Page 4 completed thL,r water discharge line across the northwest section of the property fSee Exhibit "C "). Again, given the high visibility of the storage materials from a Special Boulevard (Arrow Route), this storage area may be highly visible from Arrow Route for a minimum of one year after occupancy. .n addition, it is inconsistent w-th the storage area /screening requirements within the industrial Area Specific Plan. Normally, the Planning Division's policy is to insp! ± to assure that all on -site improvements are completri prior to occupancy of any structure,.' Howevir. there are unusual circumstances of timing that staff feelis warrant deferral if a cash deposit or 'bank letter of credit is posh as security. It is recommended that on -site improvements (i.e. :andscaping/ I stalls) should only be deferred by means of secured paziciimance I agreements. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that tha Planning Commission consider all input related to the proposed modification ;request and recommend approval of the public improvement modifications to the City Council through adoption of the attached Resolution. Staff recommends that the phasing of certain on -site improvements be approved through adoption of thi? attached Resolution. AOL Re lly u ted Bra ler City am +er 88:SH:js Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization - Exhibit "C" - Master Plan Exhibit "D" - Detailed Site Plan Ex €iibit 01E" - Conceptual La-1scape ?Ian Exhibit "F" - Conceptual 8rau,..a Plan Exhibit "G" - Ouilding F! ; @vations for Dry Cast Building Exhibit "R" - Building Elevations for Metal Cage Shop City Council Rest ution No. 88 -557 Planning Commission Resolution W. 89.132 Resolution Recommending Approval of Off - site - Improvements Resolution of Approval for On-site Improvements (DEKRUMPER ENGINEERING & ASSOCIATES. INC. CIVIL ENGINEERING 0 SURVEYING® ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND CONSULTING 556' bmrm Moummw VEWAV[NUM SCCOW FLO"* SwmEIL- INARDWO. CwuFORNM92401.12910714•884•aj59 , } FAX No. 71488&8310 - July 3, 1990 Fier" Refer To Our File No. 2253- 01.03X City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730 Attention: Steve Hayes, Project Planner RegarSing: Revision to Conditions of Approval, Development Review No. 89 -14, AMPAC, Inc., APN: 229- 121 -15 Dear Steve: This letter will serve as a'formal reques'c to revise conditions within Resolution 89 -132, approved October 11, 1989, for a Development Review project (89 -14). The applicant, AMPAC, Inc., is currently in process to obtain building permits for two manufacturing buildings on 39.3 acres in the Heavy Industrial District of the Industrial Spe -Ific P %n, located at 12167 Arrow Route. Aft It is our understanding that prior to obtaining building permits and /or receiving final occupancy, all the conditions of approval must be sat - isfied. Due to tho construction schedC.es of area wide improvement projects (Day Creek Channel and Arrow Route storm drain), which are co- ordinated with conditioned on -site and off -site improvements a hard- ship will be borne by the project owner if it is necessary to wait un- til thLse city directed projects are completed before occupying the buildings and commence product manufacturing. The primary conflicts between site development and public improvements area as follows: A. When the Day Creek Channel is complete, AMPAC is con - ditioned to install a storm drainage structure to Collect_ storm water runoff from their property and transmit it across Southern California Edison Right of Way, into Day Creek. In the interim the existing drainage condition will remain in place, which directs the runoff to a "retention basin" on Southern California Edison right -of -way, adjacent to Day Creek. B. In an agreement with the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California is con- structing a discharge lino in Arrow Route, crossing. AMPAC'S rrEM: DR )F wly Ca yU��IO��� TITLE: a .w�r,(i PLANLION EXHMIT: 4o1°' SCALE: dressed later in this letter. Copies of the subject conditions have been attached. z�Y arc 1 - I'IaY OF C� ,� iJCA11fit311iGA ` rrLE: k tevo A oll. rl, N PLP►N1 IN a I SION EXHIBM X—, ;P °SCALE: /' Page 2 7-3-90 property at the northwest turner and connecting into Day Creek Channel. The construction of this facility cannot begin until the Day Creek improvement project is completed. These construction _projects will have impacts in -areas such as land- scaping, catch basin installation, screen wail construction, and Arrow Route street improvements. Ha are proposing to divide the project into three phases to more closely coordinate with the public improvement protects. The entire ;ite improvement casts will be secured by a bond posted by the Project owner to insure completion of the development review conditions of ap- proval. PROPOSED PHASING: Please refer to the attached Phasing Plan for phase limits to more clearly identify the items to be constructed in each phase. PHASE I - Grading and construction of both manufacturing buildings and appurtenances; parking lot construction and landscaping; lunch area; landscaped planters on port-Ions of the test, east, and north brwndaries to phase limits; installation of Arrow Routa improvements, landscaping entrance driveway and emergency access to phase limits, and a portion of the screen wall as depicted on the Phasing Plan. * Building occupancy to be granted upon completion of Phase i condi- tions. PHASE II - At completion of Day Creek Chaanel improvements, con- struct storm drain facility at south property line and connect to Ray Creek Channel; landscape south property line to Phase I limits. KIASE III - At completion of Arrow Route storm drainage 'facility by FIND, completer landscaping and wall construction as allowed :,y condi. tions,in MM easement deed and city engineer: *Note: The catch basin, p8rt of engineering condition 42, may have to be installed in this phaso, due to its location within tare 1001 WO - construction easement. Conditions of Approval in Resolution 89 -132 which will be impacted by the proposed phasing are 'Planning Conditions 164; Engineering Conditions 0's 2, 4, and 11; and Standard Conditions A. - Site Development 01. A condition not impacted by the phasing, yet requesting its removal is condition K -5 of Dedication and Vehicular access which will be ad- dressed later in this letter. Copies of the subject conditions have been attached. z�Y arc 1 - I'IaY OF C� ,� iJCA11fit311iGA ` rrLE: k tevo A oll. rl, N PLP►N1 IN a I SION EXHIBM X—, ;P °SCALE: /' Page 3 7-3-90 Aftk Grouping the conditions under the three different phases, the majority would fall under Phase I. Planning condition #4 would have to be modi- fied to reflect tho installation during Phase IL - Engine ^ring condi- tion #2 should be evaluated for proper installation timing, as its lo- cation is in conflict with the 100 foot construction easement for MWD. It may need to be installed in Phase III. Engineering condition #11 indicates the location of the masonry wail is to be installed as ap- proved by the City Engineer. AMPAC is proposing to construct a chain link fence with slatting to continue through the storm. drain easement to the west property line. Standard Condition #1 under Site Development, Planning Division should be amended to reflect the phasing structure and the issuance of f ;nal occupancy upon completion of Phase I. Although conditions referencing Arrow Route street improvements will not i:2 modified as part of the proposed phasing plan, it should be nosed that AMPAC's scope.of street widening, curb -and gutter and side - walk installation is limited to the frontage between the east property line and the east line of the 100 foot MWR easement. MWO is responsi- ble for the balance of the street improvements to AMPAC's west property line. The actual construction will occur in two phases: AMPAC will construct its portion in Phase I (shown on Phasing Plan); MWD will com- plete the improvements as part of their storm drain construction (Phase III). Lastly, Standard Condition #5 under Dedication and Vehicular Areas, Engineering Division, is requested to be deleted. Generally, this con- dition is applied to residential developments where additional evalua- ON tion or review of another access point may not occur as part a permit process. However, since commercial or industrial projects require that any additions or changes to an approved site development plan be re- viewed by the appropriate permitting division, the opportunity is there to evaluate a proposed vehicular access. In conclusion, AMPAC, in the process of implementing these conditions, -found restrictions limiting their ability to complete the project inde- pendent of public projects adjacent to their site, requests only to modify the timing of the conditions,: not the elimination of any im- provement orientated condition. We would like the opportunity to review proposed modifications to the final conditions, once prepared. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, KR 7(957 NEERING 5 ASSOCIATES, INC. } Paul Teem Fred J. Abbitt Planner R.C.E. 27674 1 � TTEM: n2 rat rman I UCRQNC4 F TT17.E: Lt�rs► �:.oi*, a °��.,� N PLAI\TparN r MISION -,-,- EXHE3rr ` SCALE- 1-7 ul ci D. -I , ISO L 3 - O ° Lj UZ .a6, QOOOGO o a o O°Q°00 aa ITY OF It NCRO•CLTCAMONGA MM ,. y PLANNING' i3IMION 7ME; E�HIBi'Yy �r�a� SCALE:. P 1 C 5 00 %J _ l -4A �w�,5f- fi�oQ�-fd �c ok••tp�n .. : •� _waevw2; � = I 3kY'P.ay'G�J�hLn i a.. t.e+S'ti Y 44- r-1 G In OF RANCHO-, 'CUCAMONGA rrEb4 PLANNING DEMION TffL£. /h 4 � A► ., N' K L c 5cALE. ti i r ITY OF RANCHO,.CUCA11+ifONGA. Y'i`ENgs q- I PLANNING* LJa.W1.7ION aaai..a Dc- ,o;'.e�� �.�"_Y1or.f0/1 .+11, EXiIdBET!' i� -1 "SCALE: l .%- -- -- a LLIL I' � � ' mil. ' JL��. l.r_ Y-tP% wn• _ . ,� OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ` rrEm. _2_R li- IN c PLANNING DIVISION 'IME:_O-11; P o� (5�4++. sit {,�,' N E iIBrr.' A -e SCALE: ^� tl M� aI��PLYMi ' � � c�v �rt+�ialu ar�PO�wrA �mwl . ® N �>•F� N1Ct C.MT ' Ql M �nryi� 1.iltlu.YOp- I�NRM TAR � 4� Ytu•., �� I • �M.t�.M wMV ' III Mi'•O.MVIM t� t FiY OF TL NCHO CLICAMONGA irEM: 4t A •Ind sr t.} PLANNING, pt!5t%5Il7pt ITME. SCALE: i tc i IS[w w.w..w.w��1. R���tK Itty lt' a �t 1t M =1. ■.M. t 1 1 1 TtP 1 �I� w.�.�Pp YI•. qty .w... UALtYl.p +....w... i I1Y OF RANCHO+CUCA1IONGA rrEM; OR ®j mo� #) DIVISION 1,! PLANNING- DIVISION EXHII¢TI's'�c- '° SCALE: / L {I1l �1 ... ,f� -!'wn i a� -i � r\ \ � y _�. - y„si. \i�J`�^1'/�/./•� \ \� +� °/ �•? + . ,'� ' it :! � ; VVV... .'�r -= - ... • '' �~`�\ �_ _rQ 11 .�� `• 1�`' � ,`' I"` -t� +^ � , s�ii •I'd'!11 1"!'N``'�' ,,, + � . '"' 1- i' *- a�\ �,y , � �t � T 4� n •� , - fit... �, �•_,.,, tA 1 r 1° ` ��� ►4 ^�,,i`..`r 1, 4-W �l - " M11tM • NRM.:.� tIIM i ttt.�l • , ' rw °� �._ { ;QTY OF RANCHO, CUCAMONGA iiEM: * �i-lN Ce�l�f.3 PLANNING DMSION nIRyZ.�: sra� %� %:,,n N Aft EXHiIitT:'�F� -I SCALE- i �M satim + a I'TY OF IRANCH0'CttCAMONGA nrEMS OR S_1 -14 cMa4,1 PLANNING, G' IVYSIOIV (^ddl r, f EXHII;Tt�F -� � .SCALES a' 7.2 s .. 1 • .!Y 1 • NA � �� � I �i � ' " r! � � ' t I • •t j— � � 1 • � •.,..i` C "S; "«• • '� i rim` i'.i M .. rf � �j' _..r,o � TN OF RAN-CHO CUCAMONCA �f'EM:•�R,�j'H(M.d•) PLANNING DIVISION +1Ti'[.E.G�1 �►a�;s�� wSp t,.," u, N EXHIBIT: p -3" SCALE: i 3 91 € 1. 1, j �- as �' • II Ir�.� MT�r i war • w,W b, w��w L. In OF RANCHO+CUCAMONGA ITEM: -� *w -eN t j4oA) PLANNING' DPJ7SION r EXHIBtTf F- q"sc,kL& i caamy a4 �MAZP91IDq su w4r ` ,i 'iY OF RAY CRO-- CUCAMONGA rr-M.- OR PLANNING- Di r-SION Tma 26-4 EXHIBrr. -1 SCALE: d t l C:' M(Fa'4UU USU.UIMATUBDW sre ixrc imo 'Q UD_ 041(! Om ®q w w4 r iTY 3F 1tAP�fC O CUCAMONGA rrEi4:l�t�_ @1�l [r��•j FLANr r►ja DTViSION TfrtE: EXiiIBIT: `C�.2'! SCALE: G^7[�6tiif ®tL�Mu1V0ffiq p— UiMA�3UIMM vu W4W uedn � 1 1...4tn to W0l shs t%aY JCS' OF RANCHO— CUCAM®NGA 1'IMH't: _[A I ff PLANNING, l?r.MION '=p—; • aa, •i£ �-h I � � , N _2o RESOLUTION NO. 89 -132 A RESOLUTION OF, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 89 -14 FOR TWO MANUFACTURING BUILDINGS TOTALING 26,000 SQUARE FEET ON 39.3 ALRES OF LAND IN THE HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, SUBAREA 15 OF,THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT 12167" ARROW ROUTE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IZ SUPPORT THEREOF. APN 229- 121 -15. A. Recitals. (i) AMPAC Inc, has filed an application for the approval of Development Review No. 89 -14 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter, the subject Davelopment Review request is referred to as "the application ". (ii) Cn the 11 t of October 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. i B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as.follows 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts j set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. ' 2. Based upon substaaytial eviaence presented'to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting on October 11, 1989, including written and oral staff reports, 'this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 12167 Arrow Route with a s`.ree° frontage of 521.81 feet and lot depth of 2350.02 feet -and is presently improved with two buildings and related parking areas. (b) The property to the north of the subject site is vacant, the property to the south of that site consists of vacant land, the property to the east is a winery and 'vacant, and the property to the west is vacant. i 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced' meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragr,3phs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby 'finds and ' !, concludes as follows: 1) landscaped planters with radius curves shall be provided along the dry cast building perimeter wherever possible. The palette within the planter shall include evergreen, shrubs and annual color of low profil`e.' The planters and palette shall be i indicated on the detaiied landscape /irrigation plans which shall be. approved prior to the issuance of building permits: 2) A minimum 6 -foot high chain link fence shall be provided for safety purposes around the interim detention basin on the Southern California Edison property to the west. Said fence` should be installed prior to the issuance of building permits for the new buildings on -site. 3) The Devore Freeway right -of -way adjacent to the project shall be landscaped in accordance with a c., master plan for the entire segment of the freeway within the City as approved by'CalTrans, the City Planner, and the City Engineer. However, if j ` Z� I PLANNING COMMiSSIOr. - SOLUTION NO. 89 -132 DR 89 -14 - AMPAC It•., October 11, 1989 P ` 2 (a) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and + (b) That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the 'Industrial Spee fix Plan and the ;purposes of the district in which the site is ',coated; and (c) That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the . applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan; and (d) That the proposed -use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in thn. vie-nity. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, future, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every, condition` set forth below and in the attached` Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division 1) landscaped planters with radius curves shall be provided along the dry cast building perimeter wherever possible. The palette within the planter shall include evergreen, shrubs and annual color of low profil`e.' The planters and palette shall be i indicated on the detaiied landscape /irrigation plans which shall be. approved prior to the issuance of building permits: 2) A minimum 6 -foot high chain link fence shall be provided for safety purposes around the interim detention basin on the Southern California Edison property to the west. Said fence` should be installed prior to the issuance of building permits for the new buildings on -site. 3) The Devore Freeway right -of -way adjacent to the project shall be landscaped in accordance with a c., master plan for the entire segment of the freeway within the City as approved by'CalTrans, the City Planner, and the City Engineer. However, if j ` Z� I PLANNING COMMISSIC ESOLJTION NO, 89 -132 OR 89.14 - AMPAC int.. October 11, 1989 Page 3 Cal Trans will not allow the incremental construction of this freeway landscaping with this project, a cash payment in -lieu of construction as a z contribution to a future omprehensive project shall be made. to the City prior to the issuance of .building permits. The developer's resp',nsibility 5ha11 be limited to «he area east of the east edge f the first travel lane. 4)' An additional landscaped area 'shall be provided , along the southern boundary of the project site. The design df`the planters and locations of trees shat: talcs into account the permanent drainage facilities required for 'proper drainage of the site to tnc future Day Creek Flood Control Channel. Said landscaped area shall be shown on the detailed landscape /irrigation plans,, which shall ;be reviewed and approved by the City planner prior to the -. issuance of building permits. 5) The ansard' material for the dry cast building and "cage" shop shall be of a -soft gray color, 6) The mansard overhang on the dry cast building shall be reduced in pitch as to appear as a less obtrusive element to the building. 7) The height of the southwest section of the building shall be raised to 'three and one -half feet, consistent with the change of horizontal distance to the mansard material`. -� 8) The material used on the southwest portion of the building shall be tilt -up concrete.,� th a scored finish. 9) All concrete areas shall be painted to match' the eave or mansard material (a, soft nn,ay color). , 10) The base of the entire building shall be poured-in- place concrete. 11) Substantial reveal lines mall be incorporated on the concrete (southwest) portion of the building. 4 12) A slight return shall be provided for the , variation to give a "finished" look to the builing. PLANNING COMMISSIO ESOLUTION NO. 89 -132 DR 89 -14 - AMPAC Ii:_: October 11, 1989 Page 4 13) The chain link fez. 'ze along the west property line shall include slatting to aid in screening oc�door storage from view of the future �•Aggional trail. along ` Day Creek. Said slatting shall be a Yeather- resistant material. Engineering Division 1) Arrow Route street improvements shall be designed per the approved City 'plans ftr the vertical alignment over Day Creek Channel and the East Arrow master plan storm drain. Improvements on Arrow Route shall include I8 feet of ,pavement on the north ide of the street cente.1ine. street Install 'the.necessa:;y catch basins) and laterals) on the south side of `'Arrow Route for future connection ti,? the East Arrow ,master plan storm drain. Provide a temporary connection to discharge these flows to the project site, 3) A drainage acceptance ag ment shat? be _recorded prior to buibuil,rmit issuance. J[ C lic storm drainage easement shall be provided eling the T -:15 Freeway along the northwest rty line from Arrow Route to the west property prior to t!%�e issuance of building permits. 5) The o M6 shall btained from Southern_ California Edison priO to the issuance of building permits: a) A permanent private storm drain easement along the north side of the railroad easement from the project west property line to Day Creek, in favor, of this property; and b) 'Temporary permission to discharge drainage from the project site to the existing unimproved retention area within the Southern California Edison easement. 6) Construct -a local storm drain from Day Creek Channel to the project site an the north side of the si railroad tracks within the Southern California ;r- Edison easement. PLANNING COMMISSIC 'CSOtiIION NO. 89 -132 OR 89 -14 - AMPAC'1 >._ . October 11, 1989 Page 5 a) The design of this facility shall be based on a Final Drainage Study and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of 1. ilding 3 permits. c b) The design of on -site drainage facilities shall be reviewed by tip City Engineer for compatibility with the Day Creek system design -prior to issuance of grading permits:.' c) Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney- guaranteeing completion 'of the permanent facilities and the removal of interim facilities upon the City's completion of Phase INA Day Creek Channel " improvements prior to the issuance of building permits. 7) Pe•-mits -will be required from Southern California Edison for work within their rights -of -way. 8) The existing overhead utilities �felectrical, except for the 66KV electrical) along.- -the project !west boundary shall be undergrounded from Arrow Route to AML the first pole off -site south of the project, south boundary prior to pubic improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. 9) The existing overhead utilities (electrical, except for the 66KV electrical) on the project side of Arrow Route shad be undergrounded from the first pole off- sitP,east of the project east boundary toy the first pore west of the midpoint of the combined CalTrans and San Bernardino County Flood Ccntrol District easements (or existing terminus if closer), prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first, The developer may request a - reimbursement agreement to recover one -half the difference between the undergrounding cost for the utilities on the project side of the street minus I those on the opposite side of the street from future development as it occurs on the opposite side of the - street. 10) An in- lieu fee as contribution to the future undergr,;unding of, the existing overhead utilities (railroad communication) on the opposite side of the A.T. b S.F. railroad tracks shall be paid to the f i i �A� �I PLANNING COMMISSIOt 'SOLUTION NO. 89 -132 DR 8944 - AMPAC IN6; October 11.;1989 Page 6 City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount '_ w times the length frcA the center of the combined FCO and SCE easement widt',,5 to the east project boundary (625± feet) . 11) he masonry` wall along Ar ow Route shall only encaroach on the public_ storm drain easement as approved by the City Engineer. Landscaping within the public easement shall be approved by the City t Engineer. 6. The Secretary to this Comission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution: APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1989. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: C�r 047 v arry icNieI , C Fina ATTEST. 9r r, tart' I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Comission of the--'City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that-the foregaing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,., passed, and adopted by the planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamf Via, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commi_sAon field on the 11th day of October, 1989, by the fol: owing vote- to -dit; AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: Cr;;MISSIONERS: CHITIEA ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS* WEINBERGER J T-2-7 � $E�E"ua «:. .moo' ^a'. �$.. °� �g`o $ M`L`•L° OCCY Aaff4 N. y. yN® pi q� 0 qV� `L COC pae LIJ Z c.+i ^Ny'•gy �$9.ba.^ct.�8i °`$��� Ha. y! °`a`'c. in D;LYC3 l.USZ- VVC YC� i = =� H�■�a• Yy•y�^ o j! Y� G`�0 �pG CY i ^� a V� O y L �• y I4 Y O �. oa°e+°O1cw® a� �« � $ a$ N gO .j!., 7r �•`�r NU�`GOM {QOYY. C60 Y. ■N. 'C .`$ ^>6 ^N �Nt. CyY111ry rYS�YO � YY� q i PS G .Ge •� YCC°L yyamG• GG ��yy �.. .. e> „!!y ■y■?? . wYY. -al L •� C C 0 9 o V 0 •L'l NC O. `„ Y tl w M O C you y + a> C •'iG �aiYa:S 4� e)O�i iti $i dfJ • Ydp N 6 f U fil V W 1 ^ Y a R ra s .. ai Y s� a t_ Y ;- `s_ ♦ is r `a 0 _r 8gM o� V� g, s �t e s. • = "s i 1 ^ � yy, yy O A O yyk. Y yy Y N O^ Z O C y24, r 1.- . V Vp ri dr CC Y yMO+ �_ Y �M �O -w �__.Hc •ie�OS yp. „ vo a ce�IL N Y 2" c.._ �a "y Qg u�a °. NI.; i�o C VLv N:r EFN aT�^ °CSC_ {.G 3 I g ` N E.uwy' i LL •« =.M.d$'�Y W E'[ N 1 m as 5.w r711j vY� A it .. III 8�g a.. r V c Lab low .a a = E sa s rspp f- n Ir , :o_ a- .� i�.s- �• Y x r 0 Y f 31 s r O 1 i w.�M� WbP3 AV, tilt% 5-i' sazCNN Y p 00E^ ieyr� i_a 3. NLC`TL .OV J4 ti tr ` M �V� GN�V d� } }}.. O__ +..."CCCee S gsOO 4MMY �= CsYY Oo to r.5 .1 PU - i oz Y fl V N r SN C� i 1 v Wa = yy� Boa. L TL die r� 3 �lY„Y�IP«I! 11. M fir_ y —2 $x? a sa3_s x gas saii=41 No- _ w i I a tsus � 1Ins r. eg fi- 21. :. —,- s 30 = %2 . i r^ Y• M— t� 3 i wii ga�6iawr. ,tlrTao�:$ aim aa, 11 I 0 CY. Y` Y ±�O JN Q O.V '�� CE -CYO M'YO.iS a., Oi,7� 7 N$El o = Q+ V D O. �. O V'� E IC' � i y�y ``yy■■11 yY VNi. Y �V`�A = YEp yJ N7 •� D GC ! f � Y L Gv06'y MwM•u~iw.� i s Z. -� - 7� N� ENO Oy Y� L' . N --.50 Y t Si CCw Yil" L ^MY vO� M' u. �-s VE�.`IrC�M Y�E a�V~e- vYC +yLp Myy �� ^;u'. YGI �7 F •6 � NuN»pD -MO. �yCA _OL���� +9 ONar� Z N.r7 «� O'O ° CCC -x VCY OQ YS qLC4 CC3o �- GV +�V y ■9. -C7- 01� YR � O NO Dg �CMq�gi`Y `8� cQ �NYVyYNy�C� � =v MesY ={Vy1 � •�N iN.` Y.9+ O I �A; Y`yy K yyLp -O O. pO" g. st r�SVe ,yN18s c-Y OIp x' L� i i' C E q� iM Y y` t ° $A L. ^° V N 6 7 YYw O++ C Yom. •LSD `ff aY7 YV$ LOi�CY pCNq F.V. V` CNC'.t � V p 'Y ■� �. Yy�4 _wy ypi N_.�a. psL w +V A �_ O w G gPiL Oi � ~�N � "MLq �F� r =tn yam- OV..NiwYy sO�� + ■C °��: eC� ECp CpA qg�« t ~l'V ■N` mp �i M LM YLY ++O. `{G� Vy _DrV _O `MLyCLn Vf BMOC N �N.'� tNS i1NO 1�wi <N V__ +> PY NO.O =y- 6 <V ILO Y °N M 1 ryy aq�I- V c� q ■'q■ccYO ;: L Sota J r Olt gum $ ism = r 3n�-tl i qj Yd_ CO ■i _S'_� V gr �,�V( �� �f «LVr y� «y �i YY y «}}''_aL_ iJ�.I$ <ia� ss o. s3` iu "i:%•e_ °a a2'i�lx�«°O r 1 3 C> �:. %s a. ■ s 1j�� `�`L� 7 L.�. O�'. M ✓', � V�.o e�cTtu, l�w a'3ffl« Leo a�b NN, N_ lei7 T CY �� V'M MNVQ tr �V..7C YV Z -♦ !. ►L ]R o> y 6�� , gf{r L� ��♦ isp r 1 43 IZ,yi�Yr V s A e qji `Rye • i Ifi Ti Pit e+ {`ufin t..� 3 ^4yyy xa Y ^Nw �.riGayY 'C per d y �. Y ei $aY i EA w" y o Y G Y R" y� V f I >N w �Cw• �..'�. y. YyO ±rg � �� ,i ♦y�y �� �M Sy >1" �4�M M i� � Y -� •.�Y�N4V iwM �� � VYN O� M ac ., g YkL Mpiii _�•l' yR� +�+t.� • mil\ ;%� K ..rAa� Y r ud � rYN L t s V V�O Y it rj.aM ..aZ lAN�. � • Y s lot Iffit 1► _:r— 31 El Em But Nzi tl i °ate yw�it Z�OY.Qu. Y�Y 1• � C CV Y Y% ^pO td � L-+i °�Yy- Ca� aCy &q.6 . `•tJ+ T� O V #xC V.�i. p1� 5 SO v qa = d ' y `uLy o`.y Ea $ +�° vim` � 'oa a !� v �1' N Y $ Y W � e ^� ■°p M�.-C =V W V OgC�C ���i•�i .. Ma�Y� 9.- C +wU �Gc EY Y 11a�Y 4 .i'1 a Q Y nal � (i tl�•W CA � YB �N �M Gf. O144 W Y 1 1Cf 1 ' G O C C K Yu A L« Y Y O M. i_ q� C 0 oAM Y � L:5c «'>s1.� Y4 C.Vlwd C�.L y� ■G. Ali nN �«BIQQ V OY fj mLt« = O :L® MPdP c--,' ®® cc YY w �F P' LYa� V W A �C,. = L rF W e o. 4 (. `a •1 CYCYCY i Ll 40 2 20 lw 9Q �� ^�6 • •p MY� «` o eP 1L OJ$ =r,00.. •iio .•'Ni O Y«'' N 6 Y S a110 a °« f « 6. t 6 + p sue® QN 5 4 •�r9 r m w L �. Mb d= •7 �`` •� NpYaa`a.= M.i b 46 ,s O `9 a`TL MQO M NiD YO wy ��y �9 yO ^yWp i a0 73% A S +�P «p QQ7� Amy: •} - :`A ^j �• �. e s tic ,�}` • $" ����'.. i �A' w N`• q ��1�. m'� Y a $. �, �'. � Y� $ �7 p�r 3:n ""V � w � Yr e•jl � �i3i: d k y •i « v y ss a e q W M it j 9.�p•q,. � �P b � ^�yy ` � � M�NM �i�0 �6�Ba•ry.all R r a -�' u N OWN N� ■ O °ter yp4 Xy v .UU, OrC' M N w B j -5 i" ~y3L �✓ C F i^ E C 5�0 � ' O' M4 LwONn Ll Y� y C � ONyY y Y tl —2,5 � Lrt'J�� � i �a. a n $;° ° A Sn IL'..2. �« `r .2% r N _ SS CC u� M } y'PMa � M C tl 4 S.L Y� `= Y G ]y�7 M M li. V ?+p� �� Y � Y B. 1► fYI �[fniy L �lY tN L 4r ° LSY p� eC atLM YN "Y� e g4 .s0' iYSL C °arSd NQ �tirM <I.i Y.w WI�Nb L� 2! Y� vi �.r° w �FiVW Kp.q 14 14 a o Va �y yy i �» � �SN � 0C .dC V•I 7S� a� 1 W M tly Ed xx ri �i oz Z^ Vb i N N. 1 -221 2k 1 ! A r 1 a ;-i!}}}dc... R {�i as- �p �;; "��' g� SI it! %x guy s $ ys Ila I = vita �� � MiaV � ��� ��fj �:_ PpG� Y� � � sO�(►is� Hs- Elm hP it iaw T-33 all a1ti L G V vy9 vdrL'N I AL CY yVy e V N 6 p :M n Y Y CCYNei 4�a yy 1 A 1 emu•'. _ y w S S ^"� �y L4 w D Y !Z �R it a °�a egg as �a q4� , q�= v ab� � 4 do L �!G `yypggp ■1ti. �.tl M swNi iyy..s ° 4 ` y XT a a �g`8 wwirpy tl'� •a K,r a - 7Z 3' ° alga �. 1's cC d •1! _ va n't a�lQ K ; $o �$ dw y=2 wow. _;�� _ ■{� R `' `. `. M b Ii� ^ N a B6 6 �b` v r B • 64 a �M FMY ^4 ni CS RES&UTION Nil. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF e RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF MODIFICATIONS TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVA!. FOR OR 89 -14 FOR TWO MANUFACTURING BUILDINGS TOTALING 26,000 SQUARE FEET ON 39.3 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT 12167 ARROW ROUTE IN THE HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, SUBAREA 15 OF THE INDUSTg1A! SPFCIFiC PLAN AND MAKING FINDINGS TM SIPPORT THEREOF- APN: 2219- 121 -15 A. Recitals. (i) October 11, 1989, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 89 -132, thereby approving, subject to specified conditions, DR 89 -14 which " provides for the development of 39.3 acres of land within the Industrial Specific Plan. (ii) On July 3, 1990, a request was filed by AMPAC, Inc. to modify the canuiton of approval regarding the storm drain along the south project boundary and a portiosr of the Arrow Route Street improvements and to delite the condition of approval requiring dedication of non - vehicular access along Arrow Route. (Iii) On August 22, 1990, and c�;:ai need to September 12, 1990, the Planning Commission of he Zity of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. (ivi All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is i*reby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the Facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and corre(.t. 2. Rased upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meetings on A.uyust 22 and September 12, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, tcgtth.r with public testimony,. this i Comonission hereby speci°ically finds as follows: i. (a) The City Council Resolution Noy, 88 -557 requires that final occupancy will not be granted for all the buildings until all public improvements are completed and accepted per the required Conditions of Approval. (b) The deferra, of street improvements and utilities AINk undergrounding fvl %wing the completion of the Metropolitan Water District project subject to a cash deposit and City Council approval is consistent with current City pol,cy. PLANNING COMP.TSSION RESOLUTION NO. MODIFICATIONS DR 89 -14 September 12, 1990 Page ,2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commissjon during the above-referenced meetings and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs l and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That development review is consistent with the 'General Plan, Development Code, and specific pl.ns; a,id (b) The design or improvements of thei'. development review is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, andtspecific plans; and (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and (d) The design of the development is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and (e) The development review is not likely to cause .serious public health problems; and (f) The design of the development review will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of +record, "for access through or use of the property within the proposed development. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and e- ,nsidered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 anu that a Negative Declaratiop was issued on October 11, 1989. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends 'that the City Council modify Resolution No, 89 -132 by adding condition X12 under Engineering Division to read as follows: 12) Because of disruption by the proposed Metropolitan Water District project, the completion of the portion of the Arrow Route street improvements within. the Metropolitan Water District easement and the ofidergrounding of the existing overhead utilities along Arrow Route and the west project boundary may be deferred until 90 calendar days following the completion of the Metropolitan Water- District: project if those items are secured by a ca.h deposit and the deferral is approved by t,.� City Council. b. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adopti'tn of thij Resolution. X .3' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. MODIFICATIONS - -DR 89 -14 September 12, 1990 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMONCA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman - ATTESTS Brad Buller, Secrets y I Brad Buller, Secretary of the 'Planning Commfi.sion of tti' City of Rancho Cucamo,,ga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Reso'l ,tion m5 duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Plann%iy Commission of the City of P -incho CuFartonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Comlission hold on the 12th day of Septembur 1990, by the following vote - to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: WES: COMMIS510HERSs li ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: sr -1 i y ^i RESOLUTION NO. 89 -132A A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING *� CERTAIN MODIFICATIONS TO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL P"IATING. TO THE TIMING OF ON -SITE ?MPROVEMENTS FOR DEVELtIPMENT REVIEW NO. 69 -14 FOR TWO MANUFACTURING BUILDINGS TOTALING 26,000 ON 39.3 ACRES OF LAND IN THE HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, SUBAREA 15 OF THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT 12167 ARROW ROUTE, AND MAKING FINDINGS 1N SUPPORT THEREOF, APN: 229. 121 -15. A. Recitals. (i) AMPAC, Inc., recei *ied approval from Rancho tucamonga- Pia-Ininq Commission for the approval of Development' Review 89 -14, with conditions included', in Resolution No. 89 -132, on October 11, 1989, (ii) AMPAC, Inc. filed an application for the approval of modifications to conditions at :: +approval ,nr Development Review Na. s9-14 as described in the title of tiffs Resolution. Hereinafter, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the applicatiori." (iii) On the 22nd of Augas?, 1990, and continued to the 12th of September 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meet•'ng on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. (iv) k11 legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. j B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucaoanga as follows: i 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A. of this Resolution are true and correct - 2. Based upon substantial evidence. presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meetings on August 22 and September 12, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission L:ereby specifically finds as follo?vsa (a) The application applies to praperty located at 12167 Arrow Route with a street frontage of 521.81 feet and lot depth of 2350.02 feet and is prese! -.tly improved with two buildings and related parking areas, (b) The property to tht north of the subject site is vacant, the property to the south of that site consists of vacant land, the property to the east is a winery and vacant, and the property to the west is vacant. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 89 -132A MODIFICA'eIDNS - OR 89 -14 . September 12, 1990 Page 2 (c) The application contemplates the deferral of on -site landscaping along the southern boundary of this site and the deferral of the Arrow Route streetscape ''and decorative screen wall., test of the approved driveway location. (d) The proposed Metropojitan Water District project, the completion of Day Creek Channel, and the constrilction of a storm drain connection to Day Creek Channel would result in the 'demolition of landscape and irrigation and wall improvements. (e) The City Traffic Engineer has reviewed the access locations on Arrow Route and determined that additional locations do not exist which could comply with all City codes and policies for access along major arterials. 3. Based upon the substahtiai evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meetings and upon the specific findings of facts 1 set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this - Commission hereby finds artd aonciodes as follows: !I 4, This Commission hereby find;, and certifies that *_mi project ;as been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and that a Negative Declaration was issued on October 11, 1989. S. Based upor the findings and conclusions set forth in ,paragraphs � 1, ?., 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby modifiee its Resolution No. 89- 132 by :;codifying Planning Condition 44, adding planning Condition #14, and modifying Standard Condition Site Dsvelopment 41, to read as follows: 4) An additional landscaped area shall be provided along the 'southern boundary of the project site. The design of the pl'antevt and locations of trees shah take Into account the permanent drainage facilities required fos - proper drainage. of the site to the future Day Creek channel Said landscaped area shall ue hown on the detailed landscapelirrivation plans, which shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior tc the issuance of building . permits. Due to the pending completioi of Day tireek Channel, said landscaping may be deferred unti; 90 calendar o duyS.1ollowing the completion of the storm j draild f -Mty at the south property line subject to a performance agre�arent, including rights -of -entry and sEcurity, r, k; i} PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 89 -132A MODIFICATIONS - OR 89 -14 September 12, 1990 Page 3 14) Due to the disruption Metropolitan Water Ditict (MWD) the project, thi) ' completion of the portion of landscaping Ud screen wall within the MWD easement may be deferred until 90 calendar days .following the completion of the MWD project subject to a performance agreement, includirj rights -of entry in favor of the City and security. Standard Condition Site Dev91npment 1. The ;ite shall be developed in accordance with the approved ;fans on f'le in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity �%:ing commenced thereon, all conditions of approval shall be completed to the satittfaction of the City Planner, except phasing of certain on -site improvements may be allowed where noted. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certif,f the edoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA . BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller;. Secretary I. Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereuy cE;tify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission rf tNa City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of September 1990, by the following vote-to-wit:I AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: S� ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: yo DATE: TO: FROM: SY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO MCAMONGA STAFF REPORT N September 12, 1990 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer Jerry GuarracV,o, Assistant Planner PRELIMINARY REVIEW 90.19 - CALIFORNIA COPPER RECYCLIIG - A determination of street widening and utility undergroun�ding requirements as a result of the proposed scrap operations. I. ABSTRACT: This is a request for interpretation of certain ,.odes and policies regarding improvements being recommended by staff for the proposed project, prior to submitting a formal Conditional .Ise Permit application. II. BACKGROUND: Preliminary Review 90 -19 was reviewea by ,.taff and comments sent to the applicant, George Fox, on June 19, 1990 (Exhibit "D" attached). The proposed use was determined to be a scrap operation which may be permitted in Subarea 15 of the Industrial Area Speci`ic Plan subject to a Conditional Use Permit. Additionally, the Development Code regtires scrap operations to conform to a variety of development Standards relative to fencing (material and height); as well as 'landscaping to reduce the impact of this use on surrocading land uses. The applicant appears willing and able to comply with these standards. It is, however, the Engineering Comments (Exhibit ":,r) regarding the widening of Etiwanda Avenue and the undergrounding of - utilities which the applicant is questioning. The applicant's concerns are expressed in a letter from Steven Smith of L.D. King (Exhibit "C" attached). in addition to questioning the necessity for completing the above - mentioned conditions, the applicant is concerned with the potential conflict between these improvements end a temporary Metropolitan Mater District easement which will affect the first 20 feet of frontage on Etiwanda Avenue until April 1, 1992. 111. ANALYSIS- A. Scope of 'Project & Iiaerovements: The proposed project involves the removal of the plastic Coating from copper wire and tba salvaging of the raw copper. The use will be coiduc;.ed in an existing, currently unoccupied, metal building ITEM x PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PR 90 -19 - CALIFORNIA COPPER RECYCLING eptember 12, 1950 Page 2 LJ at 888g Etiwanda Avenue. Proposed improvements incluA construction of a 20 space parking lot, the addition of Some outside equipment including 2 stacks (one 39 feet high), repainting, new fencing /screenwalls, and some landscape improvements. The exiting site hn no curb and gutter so access to the :;ite i;; uncontrolled. An,exis"ing truck, scale, located on the southwest corner of the site, will be made operational again for use by the salvage operation and the California Highway Patrol. B. Etiwanda Avenue Street Improvements: The City Municipal Code Section 12.08.04i7 ExRTit "E" attached) requires that street frontage improvements be installed along with the construction of buildings or parking lots. This project clearly intends to construct a parking lot contaii,ing 20 spaces. Tha site is currently paved with a slag material and there is no evidence of any previously paved and stripal parking Tot. There are several exemptions to this sectiod, but none. list parking lots. In fact, additional puking Spa.;es relate to irc eased traffic and, therefore, necessitate street improvements. Tt,e Planning Commission court make the determination that there was parking on the site in the past and that the current proposal is merely an upgrade by paving and .striping. Staff could not make that determination. C. Utility Undergroundinit: Tho Pianninr - ;dmmission`s utility andergrounding po ?icy (Resolution Nu. 87 -96, Exhibit "F" attached) contains an exemption (7,a) for the addition of functional- equipment and parking areas to existing developments. The items proposed fcr this project cou1 +. perhaps be classified in this category. However, the items . for this project relate to a new use, which staf c feels was not the intent of the exemption; therefore, undergrounding is required. As with the street'- '!improvements, the Planning Comnission could make a determination that the exemption is- appropriate for this project. D. Metr000litan WP:er District Easament: The aterfere ve of the Metropolitan ''Area District Easement and re) -ited project with tie street improvements and utility undergrounding is a separate issue. If the improvements and undergrounding are required as suggested by staff, the possibility of deferring the'3 until the completion of the Metropolitan Water District project will be investigated during the Conditional Use Permit process. Also, the review of driveway locations (permanent and temporary) will be doge during the formal Conditional Use _ Permit process. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PR 90 -19 - CALIFORNIA COPIER RECYCLING September 12, 1990.. s Page 3 IV. RFCOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the 'Planning Commission review the available information and, if she Commission concurs with staff's findings, direct the applicant to proceed with the formal Conditional Use Permit process and address both the widening of Etiwanda Avenue and the undergrounding of the utilities. Respectfully subgtitted, Brad ler� City .Planne BB:BH:J, /Jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Plan Exhibit "B" - Equipment Elevations Exhibit "C" - Letter from Applicant Exhibit "D" - Staff Comments Exhibit "E" - Rancho Cucamonga Municipel Codt Section 12.08.040 Exhibit 'F" - Resolution No. 87 -96 i No 4 loll _ 'is8a9= s• anJa•e .n.�iar' , tt �^ ' e E on' 'th" 1 t it L_J __.. — MW— _� 3 0. r a z � I I: ,V J3 — -- 1 tlo l; u s f 0 y 1 } 7 1 1 Q ...iii... r w 1 b JT' s �u .t ti ' 4701 -02 �� 09-12-90 PC ,Agenda 4 of-.5 0 0. ngineers/Planners —RECFIVED- lay(WRAW OCLUVOW et �vlr� rytr _ AUG 6 July 25, 1990 V File; 256-03 City of Rancho Cucamonga Department of Community Development 19599 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91720 Attention: Mr. Brad Buller Subject: Director's Report for California Recycling Dear Mr. Buller; Thank you for meeting with me and Mr. George Fox last week regarding his application for a. copper recycling facility on Etiwanda Avenue. I appreciate your taking the tsme and effort to present this project to the !finning Commission for their consideration of the City's i:apromroment standards. I've attached an outline of tie majow issues involved with the ` project, including a recommendation you and the Commission may consider. Thank you again for your effort regarding this project. Cordially, St phen J. mi Senior Urban Planner i SJS:mjo Attachment i I L.Q. M9.1110. 2151 East 6 Straal, 3urts 120A Ontaribfatilomia 91764.44M (714) N&5492 FAX 1714) 958-5463 .M-T CALIFORNIA COPPER RECYCLING 8889 Etiwanda Avenue Re echo Cucamonga, California The Project Installation of a copper recycling furnace and ancillary equipment wit -hin and adjacent to an existing vacant building. Sheathing material will be removed from copper wire during the environmentally safe procedure which has been approved and a permit granted by the South Coast Air Quality Management Board. The final product from the process in coils of pure copper wire. 'The copper will not be melted by this process. The Location The project is to be located at 8889 Etiwanda Avenue, immediately east of the Southe,,n California Edison Power-Generating Plant. In the general area are several heavy industrial uses, including two automobile scrap yards. Major issues The City of Rancho Cucamonga has adopted a series of development standards to enhance .he appearance and functionally improve the community. While these work well in the majority of land use projects, at times these standards puce financial burdens upon smaller projects, rendering the development unbuildable. In the present case, t',e City's standards appear to rewire the applicant to fully improve a half- street section along the frontage of Etiwanda Avenue. While this standard is appropriate for new uses on vacant lots or where substantial developmental changes to existing uses is planned, this requirement at this location for this minimal change in land use appaars extraordinarily overwhelming. At this location, Etiwanda Avenue is a two-lama road, as it is for its current full length through Rancho Cucamonga. A network of both 12KV and 66KV electrical lines on large poles are along the street frontage. Eventually, the City desires to place all power lines less than 66KV underground (66KV lines cannot be placed underground). If full street imcror-Aments are required, significant expense will be required. f6m work not directly associated with the road qW widening. LDGnG The large power poles, which are near the edge of the existing pavement, would necessitate relocating approximately 15 feet to ,. Alw the east. The 12KV lines would be placed underground or an in -lieu fee would be charged (for 300 feet, this is approximately $40,000). The 66KV lines would be relocated at an aaproximate cost of $8,000 to $10,000 per pole (approximately $40,000). These costs do not include road widening construction costs of approximately $20,000. This totals approximately $100,000 of off -site costs for a. project involving the installation of a furnace in an existing building. In addition, on February 20, 1990, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California acquired through an eminent domain action, a 20 -foot wide temporary easement for 27 months (to April 1, 1992) along the entire western portion, of the subject property. This is the strip of land that tae City could require improvement upon if typical standards are implemwated. This twenty -foot wide strip is to be used by the water District to store equipment during the life of a construction �;,roject along the west side of Etiwanda Avenue. Therefore, the relocation of power poles and the associated roadway widening *could not be physically possible until the spring of 1992. Development improvements The applicant desires to impro., the property to better integrate into the City's overull plan to improve the appearance of this section of the community and also to enhance the value of the property. Solid walls will encompass the rear portion of the site where parking and recd► cling equipment will be located. Two driveways, built to City standards are also planned. Landscaping and an improved building facade will be in place prior to occupancy. Paints Of Consideration - Does a project of this relatively small magnitude "trigger" full development requirements? - Can the City impose such standards if an existing temporary easement effectively prohibits such improvements? Recommendation Determine that full site improvement standards for this project are not necessary to protect the public health, safety and welfare, finding that the scale of developments does not warrant full implementation of adopted City standards. &ttltt�1 a - �'� 5`fD4FF GU s�tH1�rl�S CITY OF P .NCI51O CTJCAM, 0NGA Post Office Box $07. Rancho Cucamonga. California of .q}z't 41 ��+• ;i5t June tff, 1ga0 Mr. George Fox California Copper Re ycling, Inc. 2104 E. Fifteenth Street Los Angeles, CA 90021 SUBJECT, PRELIPINARY REVIEW 90 -19 - CALIFORNIA COPPER RECYCL:.' "," Dear Mr. Fox: On Wednesday, May 16, 1990. staff reviewed your proposal for a copper salvage operation at 8889 Etiwanda Avenue `in. Rancho Cucamonga. During the Preliminary Review process, the 9-ilding & Safety, Engineering, and Planning Divisions reviewed and commented an the proposed project. Attached please find the C„mmunity Develo4mert Submittal k ;uiroments Checklist and varivis City specification sheets which will be helpful in preparing a complete project submittal. The following cuncerrs must be addressed in you;' final project submittals Planning Division: 1, Scrap operations are allowed in Subarea 15 of the Industrial'r Specific Plan subject to a Conditio,zal Use Permit. Enclosed is a checklist for a Conditional Use Permit, review this carefully and provide all the information requested for the initial submittal 2. Scrap operations shalt be required to conform to the following standards: a. Feaces and Walls. All operations areJ storage, including all equipment used in such :businesses shall. be within an enc+osed building, or within an area enciosel by a solid wail %. solid view obscuring fence. All fences and walls shall be of a uniform height in relation to the ground upon which they stand and shall be T minimum of eight feet (8'), not to exceed sixteen feet :6') in height. All yard gates shall be solid view obscuring and no less than eight feet (8') in height. All fences and walls open to view from any public street shall be constructed of solid masonry. All fences and walls shall be uniform in color and do-s--,n and constructed in :a workmanlike manner. .:r William 1 AlewnJer Charles 1 Buyuet 11 c , t%-nt. L Smut Dvtvrah N Brutxn I'Jniela ) Wright ja.k U-- Mr. George Fox June 19, 1990 Page Z b. Landscaping. Dense trees shall ba planted and maintained along side and rear property lines to aid in screening the yard area. 3. Provide 3 sets of typed, gummed address labels for all persons connected with the project who are to be notifies (owner, , architect, engineer, etc.) 4. Provide a gully dimensional site plan, including the size and setback of all structures, outside mechanical equipment, drive aisles, parking spaces, andse_;Ne planters, driveways,. etc. 5. Full street improvements must be made along Etiwandn Avenue per the attached Engineeriiq comments" Provide a typical street section on the site plan and conceptual grading plan. 6. The Industrial Specific Plan requires a minimum average landscape setback of 25 feet along Etiwanda Avenue; also, those areas west of tie front fence, excluding parking and drive aisles, should b�- larndscaped. 7. Provide a continuous planter, minimum 5 -foot interior dimensions, between any parkin4 spaces and the building or perimeter wail. 8. Dense perimeter landscaping is required to screen any outside d equipment or storage areas. • "` 9. The Conceptual Landscape Plan should show landscaping for the areas discussed in comment 6.8 above and should indicate those techniques which will be used to comply with the City's Xeriscape Ordinance, see attached. 10. Shade all paved areas and slopes 3:1 or steeper on the- Conceptual Grading Plan. 11.. Provide illustrative building elevations showing all sides of the existing building and proposed mechanical equipment per the submittal requirements checklist. Note: an up- grading of the existing metal building will be required through the Design Review process, at a minimum, this will include: a. Repair and /or replacement.of damaged metal paneis. b. Repainting the exterior including the roof. C. Removal, repair, or redesign or the wooden roof projection on the front of the building. d. The introduction of heavy landscaping to screen the building. e. Removal of any non - conforming signs. ; �% C) Mr. George Fox June 19, 1990 Page 3 12. Revise the parking caticulations to show manufacturing space par;:ed at 1 parking ipace per 500 square feet and only the warehouse space at one parking space per 1,000 square feet. Also revise the standard spare size to be 9' X 19' and the Handicapped space tc be 14' x '19'. 13. Parking spaces Number 14 & 15 do not hove the required 26- foot" aisle width behind iaem. 14. Label the proposed use of the area north of parking space 014., 15. Provide some type of screening or decorative treatment for the proposed stacks. Enoineerino Division 1. Refer to the attached "Existing Overhead Utility Requirements" handout and provide ai separate drawing per Section B of the handout. 2. Provide a Drainage Aeoort per the attached "Drainage Report Requirements" handout. Portion of the property lies in Flood Zone A. Include protection in the report. 3. Lines of sight shall be plotted for driveways, on the Grading and Landscaping plans. Refer to attached intersection Design Policy memo modified as follows: a. Use stopping sight distance for streets which ultimately have less than 5000 ADT and one lane in any direction, and - b. Use corner sight distance for streets which ultimately have more than one lane in any direction or 5000 or greater ADT. - Provide special design for landscaping,. signs, poles, and any other above ground features within the "Limited' Use Areas," prepared by a Landscape Architect in conjunction with a Traffic ' Engineer. 4. Provide a driveway location analysis in accordance with Section - A of the attached driveway policy. The study shall extend 300 feet beyond the limits of the project site. Every effort shall be made to make the driveways for this project conform. to Section D of the Driveway Policy. A final determination will be made upon submittal of the analysis. 5. Driveways shall be a minimum of 35 feet wide at the right-of- way line and conform to City Standard No. 306 (copy attached). Mr. George Fox June 19, 1990 Page 4 6. Show truck paths with turning radius throughout the site on the site plan, 7. An additional 20 -foot right -of -way dedication is required on Etiwanda Avenue 5ringing the total to 50 feet measured from the stre -et centerline. 8. Etiwanda Avenue shall be improved along the project frontage. Building ..& 2afety 1. Submit a Conceptual Grading Plan for review during the Technical Review process. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (714) 989 -1861. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANAI G DIVISION Jerry Guarracino Assistant Planner JG /jfs cc: Steve Smith, L.D. King, Inc. j I i �' 12 12.08.030 -- 12.08.,060 CXk; biT — "E- ' R.c,.c'i•C 5eci %v^ J (2,v8.vy0 12.08.030' offer of dedication. In the event construe- tion of full frontage improvements is not immediately squired any person required to dedicate land by this section shall make an irrevocable48Dffer to dedicate property, executed by all parties having dY. interest in the property including beneficiaries anti trustees of deeds of trust as shown by a current preliminary title report prepared by a title compan_r approved by the city engineer. Such offer of dedication shall be in a form approved by the city attorney and the city engineer, and shall continue in effect until the city council accepts or rejects such offer. (Ord. 58 53, 1979). 12.08.040- Constructioa of public improvements--Recuire- ments. Any person, owner, lessee, or agent constructing or arranging for the construction of any parking lot or commer- cial, residential or i.ndsstrial building, or buildings, or building, addition or alteration, shall provide for the construction or installation to city standards, of sidewalks, curbs, gutters, street trees, street lighting, street paving to the centerline of the street, and necessary drainage structures unless such improvements already exist along all street frontages adjoining the lot on which the building or parking lot is to be constructed, enlarged or altered. (Ord: 58 54, 1979). AmencAeck 12.08.050 Construction of public improvements-- Excep- . ions. The provisirns of section 12.08.040 shall not apply rain a nU_ to : No. 'iz 19-q A. Alterations; B. Reconstruction; See �Cia C. An addition to a single family residence when the addition does not exceed six hundred fifty square feet in area: A. Construction of garages, carports, storage buildings► patio covers, swimming pools, spas, and similar structures, accessory to.a single family residence. (Ord. 58 =A 51, 1979: Ord. 58 SS, 1979). - 12 08 060 Construction of-public improvements-- Additi 0A requirements. A. Except as provided in Section 12.08.0_ 50, the building official shall deny issuance of a building perm,} or deny approval for occupancy or deny final approval and acceptance for public utility connections to any building or parking lot until required full frontage improvements exist., or are constructed or their construction is guaranteed by ati executed agreement and cash money deposited with the city in a sum approved by the city engineer based upcn one- and-one-half timers the estimated cost of constructi� B. In the event construction of full frontage ments is not required to be completed within six me tns after the issuance of the building permit, the city engineer -3y, at his option, require that a lien upon the proper} {� improved be created by contract between the owner 'sc.: ~.e (Rancho C;.zamonga 11/82) 150 L-1 h-- _ E OR MU CE NO. 420 AN CWnMINCE OF ME CM Cotv=L OF MM cny or pamcw RANCM CEXAMOGh MMCIPM CODE • s ter• e • • EMSOMRS NW, MOMQRE, MM Cl'I3C t' WCM OF MM COY OF RA=W G[JCAM MA DOES HDMY OMAM AS FC1LIMS: Oi'iM 1: Section 12.08.050 of the Rsndsn Oramc nga Mnicipal Code is hereby aid in Wa=ds and figures, as follows: "12 08 Ofi6 =9n of F""M= a` - the pmnvisiC of Section 12..08 040 shall not aMly to the folinwing: "A. Alterations which do not 91temify the use of tin building or struct=e, or generate a greater hazard to public health and safety as dew by the City Engineer; "8. Maintenance and /or recon.,tructicn of a lasting or stri:��ture provided the total cost does not Axml fifty. pent (sot) of the fair market value of the ex9.stuq building of str_ ; VIC. Any addition or dative additions within a sixty (60) mrsnth period, to an existing single- family residence provided that s=1 addition or additions do not exceed a total area of six hundred fifty (65o) square feet; 'ID. Aray addition or =Wlative additions, within a sixty (60) month period, to an existing O=Nxcial and/or Office building tctaliM less than Piv* iumdred (800) square feet cc an exi- Ling induStriaai building t ctalinq less than am thl (1,000) STj=9 feet, The prWj_ slats of this subsections tU not apply iZ surd addition or additicns oocstittute maze than fifty percent (Sot) of gross floor area of the existing building; oE. CwstZtActicn of Vaal cu —j=ts, storage buildings, patio pvess, $klilf MM pools, spas, and sil++i7ar stn ' S a ;; ' to a single- family residence; and "F. fiaga of Y Struclbivels to a OMWrcial /intistrW /cffioe l ilaing (e.g. dal . t`uvsl pmp building; similar �); c do not L'ftnsify the use of the baa lding or property,av Ordirmnce No, 420 Page 2 ;r =T—C+t 2: The City ermcil deeJ�s that should r any provision, section. Fie or wort? of this G inaire be rendered or 64,olare invalid by any firs court action in a amt'of ocapetent jurisdiction,�or by reason Of any p �}° 1P.[�j.S1at�.Sle,: the remaini 7 �j`bons, Sections, JJ ParagraPhs, sentences, and wards of this Ordinal= shall remain in full force . i and effect. SDOPION 3; Mz Mayor :shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at lease once in .the Trite valley Da'�v aa,v��ri,,� a rmGpaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Q ga. PASSED, AP;PR01W, and ADOPIM this 6th slay of June, 1990. AXES; AleSd37de1:, Smm, ER lmt, Stoat, Wright WES: None 'f ABSMr: None OAA Ai fam4s F• Stau —t, Mayor f ATI'; ,! Dabra J. Adar64, City Clerk 1, DEBRA J. AMM, CITY CCEM of the City of rancho Cuc yga California, do hereby oartity that the forapirc3 thdicsarass introduced was at a regular reeds; of the COmwil of the City of held - � 16th day of May, 1990, ant was finally paSB"d at a regular mating of the City Council of the City of rancho cucamcnga hold on the 6th clay of Via, 1990. aMUted this 7th day of Jha, 1990 at ft-cho , California.' Af Dekwa h J., Ada&, City clerk , _ J -J5 F-Xh, WT - F RESOLUTION NO. 87 -96 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COKIISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING A REVISED POLICY FOR THE UN DERGROLWDING OF EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 86 -77 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga wishes to repeal Resolution No. 86 -77 which was adopted on the 26th day of May, 1986 and establish the revised policy contained herein; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga wishes to remove unsightly existing overhead utility lines in order to promote a more aesthetic and desirable working and living environment within the City; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to establish � policy to inform property owners and developers of the City goal. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved and established that all developments, except those contained in Section 7 and any others specifically waived by the Planning Commission, shall be responsible' for undergrounding all existing overhead utility lines including the removal of the related supporting poles adjacent to and within the limits of a development as follows: Amh 1. Lines on the project side of the street* a. Said lines shall be undergrounded at the drveloper's expense. b. In those circumstances where the Planning C;!«c ssion decides that undergrounding is impractical at present for such reasons as a short length of undergrounding (less than 300 feet and not undergrounded adjacent), a heavy concentration of services to other users, disruption to existing improvements, etc., the Developer shall pay an in -lieu fee for the full amount per Section 6. c. The Developer sha11 be eligible for reimbursement of one -half the cost of undergrounding from future developments as they occur on the opposite side of the street. 2. Lines or the opposite side of the street from the project: The Developer shall pay a fee tort he ityT7o­ one -hat t amount per Section 6. 3. Lines on both sides of the street! The Developer shall comply with Section I above ana be e ig a or reimbursement or pay additional fees so that he bears a tonal expense equivalent to one -half the total cost of undergrounding the lines on both sides of the street. 4. Pole lines containini 66KV or lar er electrical line;:: All lines shall be 1 unclergrounded or in-lieu fees paid in accordance wi "c section 1, 2 or .3, above, except for 66 KV or larger electrical lines. 'I I r S. Limits of Responsibilities: a. In -lieu fees shall be based upon the length of the property beigS developed from property line to property line (the center of adjacent streetss for corner properties). b. Undergrounding shall include the entire project frontage and extend to: (T) the first existing pole off -site from the project boundaries (across the street for corner properties), (2) a new pole erected at a project boundary (across the street for corner properties), or (3) an existing pole within 5 feet of a project boundary, except at a corner. 6. Fpa Amount: The amount for in -lieu fees shall equal the length (per Ser±ion .a times the unit amount as established by the" City Council based upon information supplied by the utility companies and as updated periodically as deemed necess?ry. 7. Exemptions: t!ie following types of projects shall be exempt from this po Ic�_Tyo —_ a. The addition -if functional equipmeni to existing `developments, such as: loading docks, silos, satellite dishes, antennas, water tanks, air conditioners, cooling towers, enclosure of an outdoor storage area, parking and loading areas, block walls and fences, etc.. -,, b. Building additions or new free standing k'ildings of lesz, than 259E of the floor area of the existing buildingis) on the same assessor's parcel, or S,OOO square feet, whichever is less. c. Exterior upgrading or repair of existing developments, such as: reroofing, addition of trellis, awnings, landscaping, equipment' screening, repainting and exterior finishes, etc. d. Interior tenant improvements and non-construction CUPs. e. The constriction of a single family residence on an existing parcel. f. E- ting overhead utility lines located in trails, alleys, and utility ..cements with a heavy concentration of services to 5djacent , lavelopments, and the utility lines are 500* or more from the right of way line.of a Special Boulevard. g. Residential subdivisions of four or fewer single family residential parcels, where the utility lines extend at least 600' offsite from both the project boundaries and the adjacent property is not likely to contribute to future undergrounding. * All references to streets shall also mean alleys, railroad or channel rights -of -way, etc. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10th DAY OF JUNE 1987. PLANNING COM ISSION OF l k CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA t t BY• %K •La4ra Chairman ATTES _ ecre ary I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10 day of June, 1987, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK, CHITIEA, MCNIEL HOES: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY C ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY CITTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT .r DATE: September 12, 1990 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Miki Bratt, Associate Planner SUBJECT: COUNTY REFERRAL 88 -05 - UNIVERSITY CREST - Master Tentative Tracts, =in -Tl Development Plan Map, and various Tentative Tract Maps for 1,293 single family residential units, 6.3 acres of commercial, 4.56 acre park site, and 7.17 acre school site for University Crest (Planned Development Proposal on 425.16 acres of land located north of Highland Avenue, south of utility corridor, east of Day Creek Channel, with portions west of Hanley Avenue and portions west of Etiwanda Avenue within the City's Sphere of Influence. The proposal also includes the dedication as permanent open space of 675 acres located within the National Forest. \_:.I 1. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission reviewed this item at their meeting of August 22, 1990. At the meeting, the applicant ,handed out a 16 page letter dated August 21; 1990, addressed to the County, regarding comments on the subject project to the County by City staff. In order to have time to review the applicant's comments, the Commission requested that the item be brought back to the Commission. Also, by consensus, the Commission recommended support for the positions taken by City staff and requested that the item be referred to City Council. The item was scheduled for the City Council meeting of September 5, 1990. The staff _report to the City Council of September 5, 1490 is attached. II. ANALYSIS; Staff has reviewed and commented on the August 21, 1990 letter addressed to the County in the attached staff report to the City Council. A summary of the City Council comments will be provided during the oral presentation for this item. The key issues, including adequacy of the environmental review, density, design, and timelines, have not been resolved at the time of the writing of this staff report. is The County Planning Commission hearing on the subject application has been rescheduled for September 20, 1990. J ITEM IC RECOMMENDATION: Support City staff recommendations and direct staff to prepare commznts recommending denial of the University /Crest Project For the September 13, 1990 meeting of the County Planning Commission. BACKOF;,.,n: The City Planning Commission reviewed the subject proposal at t' meeting of August 22, 1990. By consensus, the Planning Commi: %lly suppor;:ed the staff positions- which wsre forwarded to the Coin,. + August 6, 1990 and recommended that the information be forwarded to the City Council for review. (See attached Staff 11aport and attachments.) The applicant gave the City Planning Commission .a copy of their letter of August 21, 1990 to the County responding to the City's comments. (See attached,) The Planning Commission requested that the item be brought back to their meeting September 12, 1990 so that they could respond to the applicant's comments. City staff has prepared comments on the ' orementioned letter. (See attached.) ANALYSIS: There are many complex issues relating' to this project. firs this report, staff has tried to highlight and summarize key issues. Staff is recur, + ,tend ing denial of the University Crest project based on four main concerns: K-3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGn STAFF REPORT Ne DATE: September _5;.'1990 TO: Mayor and M! mbers of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Miki Bratt, Associate P' ,finer SUBJECT: COUNTY REFERRAL 88 -05 - UNIVERSITY CREST - Master Tentative Tracts, Final Development Plan Map, and various Tentative Tract Maps for 1,293 sing` a f.:nily residential unit_;, 6.3 acres of commercial site. 4.56 acres park site, and 7.0 acres school site- for University Crest Planned Development Proposal on 425.16 acres of land, located north of Highland Avenue, south of utility c43rridor, east of Day Creek Channel, with portions west of haviley Avenue and portions west of Etiwanda Avenue within the City's Sphere of Influence. The propc,3al also includes the dedication as permanent open space of 675 acres located within the National Forest. RECOMMENDATION: Support City staff recommendations and direct staff to prepare commznts recommending denial of the University /Crest Project For the September 13, 1990 meeting of the County Planning Commission. BACKOF;,.,n: The City Planning Commission reviewed the subject proposal at t' meeting of August 22, 1990. By consensus, the Planning Commi: %lly suppor;:ed the staff positions- which wsre forwarded to the Coin,. + August 6, 1990 and recommended that the information be forwarded to the City Council for review. (See attached Staff 11aport and attachments.) The applicant gave the City Planning Commission .a copy of their letter of August 21, 1990 to the County responding to the City's comments. (See attached,) The Planning Commission requested that the item be brought back to their meeting September 12, 1990 so that they could respond to the applicant's comments. City staff has prepared comments on the ' orementioned letter. (See attached.) ANALYSIS: There are many complex issues relating' to this project. firs this report, staff has tried to highlight and summarize key issues. Staff is recur, + ,tend ing denial of the University Crest project based on four main concerns: K-3 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT COUNTY REFERRAL 88 =ns - UNI,ZRSITY /CREST September 5, 1990 Page 2 - o A Specific Plan must be approvea ,.,ior to individual ti project approvals. o The den ity is too high._ o Design criteria is inadequate, o The Environmental Review is inadequate. S, i, 'sic Plan Must come first. Since there is no infrastructure aid no .;ices avaiiable in the Sphere ar their provision and financing nave been of critical concern to the City. A Circpl:ation Plan, an Infrastructure Phasing Plan, an Etiwanda North fire W;ynagement Plan Ordinance, and a Resource Management Plan have been identified as critical components of an 'Etiwanda North Specific Pia.. These components will identify the capital improvements needed, costs, phasing, and financing alternatives.' They will also identify the share contribution which each project must contribute. It is crucial that the entire infrastructure package, be completed and approved before any, additional individual projects are approved in the Sphere area,. This concern is no less if development occurs in the County instead of through annexation to the City. University /Crest Density. For a numbsr of reasons density has been Ask added onto the University Crest Tract so that the overall gross density f f is 2.83 dwelling units per acre and three individual tr&cts exceed i{ 4 dwelling units per gross acre. In contrast, adjoining tracts have been approved at or near the County base density of 3 dwelling units per acre. For example, Tentative Tract 13835 - Blackmon /Homestead - west and adjacent to the Caryn Plfnned .Community was approved by the County for 3.12 dwelling units per gross G' acres and Tentative Tract 13812 - PulsarlWatt adjoining to the east 1 was annexed to the City and approved for 2,08 dwelling units per gross acre. Transfer of development rights of 17 units from the 675 acre open space parcel within the National Forest is consistent with the Planning Commission recommendation that residential development above the National forest boundary must be discouraged. The City has lever supported the County's concept of density ,bonus, therefore, we .lave restated our opposition to the 10% density bonus ` requested in the County by this or any applicant. Also, transferring density from the identified school and park site is inconsistent with the City's goals and objectives, in that the park site is part of the State minimum requirement for the applicant's park contribution. Ell CITY COUNCIL STAFF 'REPORT COUNTY REFERRAL 88 -05 - UNIVERSITY /CREST September 5, 1990 Page 3 Finally, we oppose the transfer of units from the Crest site to the ti University site because the University site is too constrained to receive the additional units. City staff has requested that any proposed transfer of density from one planning area to another in the Sphere area not only identify the public interest served by the transfer, but also justify the ability of the receiving panel to absorb the additional density. ,fesian Criteria. An important purpose of a Specific Plan is to provide cohesive design criteria for the- Ftiwanda North area._ A design plan has. been developed by the Consortium of Etiwanda North Landowners, incorporated into the draft Etiwanda North Specific Plan, and reviewed in several Planning Commission workshops. When the Specific Play; is adopted, it will _provide guidelines and standards for neirtrherhood identification, landscape treatments, architectr.:ral design, and neighborhood amenities. including park and S0001 locations, as well as establish a backbone circulation system for the Etiwando NorJ planning area. These design issues which affect the entire SnIn,ere of Influence planning area should be worked cult before any more Individual projects are approved. Further, the design of the University /Great tracts has moved away from the design criteria recommended by the Planning Commission. Planning Cormission recommendations include interior paseos, curvilinear streets, , and paseo connections to off -site open spac•:: Environmental Review _is Inadeouate. The Planning Commission requested' that environmental issues be addressed in more detail. Following is a i brief summary of major environmental concerns: o The Environmental lu,pact Report for this project was initiated prior to the City and County applications by the Consortium of Landowners' for an Etiwanfla North Specific Plan. However, those applications', create cumulative impacts which must be addressed by this project. o County staff has indicated that traffic issues are being addressed in revisions to the draft Final Environmental Impact Report. "c of the writing of this staff report, the "Addendum" to the EIR is not available for review. o The University Reserve system has identified their property as an example of sensitive Alluvial Fan Scrub Habitat and included it as a research area for the Reserve System. The loss of this habitat has not been discussed in the EIR. Also, two blue line streams, indicated on the U.S.G.S. maps, run through the. University /Crest sites. The effect of these stream CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT COUNTY REFERRAL 88 -05 - UNIVERSITY/CREST - September 5, 1950 Page 4 closures 'has not been.: adequately discussed in the EIR. ` The respponsible agencies for wildlife resources,` the California Department of Fish and Game and the U.S Fish " and Wildlife. Service, have not yet commented on this project. A resource management plan addressing the cumulative "impacts of development on the w7ldlif':! "and - habitat resources in the Spbere area should 'be approved prior to certification of any individual project EIR, o The applicant has taken the postian that the application has been filed in the County and therefore, the City- identified Red "Hill Fault study zone need" not be addressed. However, sine the., inferred fault runs near or through the proposed school and park site this issue must be addressed. SUMMARY /CONCLUSION: The University /Crest "project is a part of development of the entire Etiwanda North area. This area has: the "To potential to,positively'or negatively impact the entire City. ensure that there is adequate public disclosure and participation in the future development of tha Etiwanda North .area, the City Council has passed " Resolutions of Intent to Annex and authorized preparation of a City sponsored Specific Plan and EIR for the entire area. To contir +ue the above policies, City staff requests that the City Council direct staff to prepare comments for the County Planning Commission recommending denial of the University /Crest project. 1 sub r Qe i "I i nee BB:MB :mlg j Attaciaaents: Staff Report to the Planning Commission, August 22, 1990 with Attachments "A" - "C" C Applicant's Letter to County, August 21, 1090` City Staff's Comments on Appl'icant's Letter, August Z1. i 1990 f i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Afillik STAFF REPORT i *a� DATE: August 22, 1990 2 19 TO: Chairman and Vam.bers of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Bul'.er, City Planner BY: Miki Bratt, Associate Planner SUBJECT: COUNTY REFERRAL 88 -05 UNIVERSITY CREST - Master Tentat — Tracts, Final Development Plan Map, and various Tentative Tract Maps for 1,293 single family residential units, 6.3 acres of commercial, 4.56 acre park site, and 7.17 acre school site for University Crest Planned Development Proposal on 425.16 acres of land located north of Highland Avenue, south of u,,lity corridor, east of Day Creek .Channel, with portions west of - Hanley Avenue and portions west of Etiwanda Avenue within the Ci;ty's Sphere of Influence. The proposal also includes the dedication as permanent open space of 675 acres located within the National Forest. I. BACKGROUND: The subject proposal consists of 1,293 single family residential units, a 6.3 net acre commercial site, a 4.56 acre park site, and a 7.17 acre, school site on 425,16 acres of land generally located north of Highland Avenue, south of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power /Southern California Edison utility corridor, east of Day Creek Channel, and with portions west of Hanley Avenue and portions west; of Etiwanda Avenue. The proposal also consists of 675 acres of privately owned land within the National Forest in the Day Creek watershed to be dedicated as permanent open space (see attached Vicinity Hap). The proposal was first submitted to the County in 1988. In 1989, it was submitted to the City as part of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. in reviewing the maps, the Planning Commission commented that, in general, lots should become increasingly larger -I in size north of Highland Avenue. The Commission also supported density transfers.to achieve larger lots in the north so long as the receiving parcels within the Etiwanda North Specific Plan area could absorb' density. On several occasions, City staff advised the applicant that 'a Gnera� Plan Amendment would be required for the University and Crest properties to change their Land Use Designation from open space to residential acid that Low Density (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre) was the highest intensity of use which would be PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CR 88 -05 — UNIVERSITY /CREST August 22, 1990 n age 2 II. K-F consistent with tte County Land Use Designation of Residential, up to three units per acre. Staff also advised that the density on the University tracts was too high and the lot sizes too small to meet Low Density development requirements. In February 1990 the applicant submitted a screen check draft Specific Plan to the 'City which reduced all lot sizes by 10 percent. The applicant said that the across the board lot size reduction was the uniy way they could meet the requirements of the City's Engineering Division for 60 foot right -of -way for local sti,sets, On February 22, 1990, City staff informed the applicant that no further processing of concurrent tract map submittais 'in the Sphere territory could occur in tie City until the conflict about lot sizes was worked out, The applicant said any other solution would require a reduction in - density and that density' was not negotiable. City staff repeated that the City's position was that City "otandards must be met. With that, the City and the applicant appeareu to be at an impasse. In March 1990 Joe DiIorio met with County staff about reactivating the County University /Crest application. On April 23, '1990, Mr. Dilorio, acting for the Caryn Company-2nd the Regents of the University of California, submitted z ,evised Preliminary Plan of Alk Development to the County. Soon thereafter, the Tentative Maps and Final Development Plans were also submitted to the County. A copy of the most recently revised Preliminary Development Plana .dated August 3, 1990, has been included in.the Commission packets. Attached is the Land Use Plan. On May 9, July 2, and August 8, 1990, City staff provided comments to the County Development, Review Committee meetings on the subjt�ct applications. - Staff comments on the subject applications ave intended to be consistent with the City General Plan, Development Code, policies, standards, and guidelines, as well as previous - direction frim the City Planning Commission and City Council. Staff comments dated August 6, 1990, are attached. t 11"ririg the August meeting of the County DRC, Mr. DiIorio stated that the comments received from the City reflected staff's opinion and did not appear to reflect the opinion of the City Planning Commission or the City Council. Present at the August meeting were County staff, City staff, the applicant's technical team, a representative from Supervisor Mike-is office, and a member of the County Planning Commission, Mr. Raymond Ferguson. ANALYSIS: Staff's comments include a list of concerns coupled with a suggested list of conditions which would mitigate the concerns. Following is a summary of several of the major concerns: MW K-F PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CR $5 -05 - UNIVERSITY /CREST August 22, 1990, Page 3 * Opposition to the County density bonus of 119 units. Opposition to counting resl,,Aial density and bonus of approximately 38 arits for school and park sites. Opposition to minimum lot size of 6,000, square feet in comparison to County and City standards of a 1,200 square -foot minimum. * Opposition to shifting lots from the Crest site to the University site, resulting in densities of more than four dwelling units per acre on at least two University tracts. Lack of seismic studies for school and park sites which are located within or adjacent to the City's Red `Hill Fault seismic study zone. * Absence- of "formal agreements b'_tween applicant and County guaranteeing amenities and improvements proposed by the applicant to justify the density bonus, most of which are located off -site. * Absence of formal ,agreements ` by agencies and property owners granting permission for use of property for off -site improvements and amenities. 11I. 'IOTICE REQUIREMENT: There is no noticing requirement for a County referral, however, staff did notify the applicant (Caryn Company) and invited them to attend the Planning Commission meeting. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff is requesting that the City Planning Commission review staff comments and direct staff to forward the aforementioned comments to the City Council. The Planning Commission should also recommend that the City Council direct staff to forward the comments or, to the County Planning Commission in a format appropriate for the County Planning Commission. _ Re t uliy to , Sr B e City P anner BB:MB /jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "B - Land Use Plan i Exhibit "C" - Staff Comments, August 6, 1950 I 1 ` s i t o d .. �aF9ERB. CF 1 MI 119 ! Z �.. .�. !! 3 c NF6UEP6 ar 4 : �Rz sues LEGEND 1111111111 1 SPECIFIC PLAN 90.41 ETfWANDA NORTH => INCLUDES AP.EAS 2 - 5 & A - E 2 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNL9/CARYN 3 LANDMARK DEVLPMT. CO. 4 CHENG 5 CHANG COMPLETED ANNEXATIONS: A = CARYN, B = MELCHER, C = AHMANSON, D = PULSAR, & E = BLACKMAN/HOMEST&W A EMS71NO CITY SPHERE OF INFLUENCE r" ^,� ITEM: UNIE'ERSTTROJET CITY OF Il UCAMONGA N PI<AN11Tin3Gz ION TITLE: VYC�iEXHIBIT:1lA :� NONE Ell . 61N �.3_ • a • ra • V CN nr�.•. r.�e. • Yi�:lR Ll N! N j • ,, i • • 6 Q. S � a SAN • NMA11 ®IN :11ssw v LEGEND 1111111111 1 SPECIFIC PLAN 90.41 ETfWANDA NORTH => INCLUDES AP.EAS 2 - 5 & A - E 2 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNL9/CARYN 3 LANDMARK DEVLPMT. CO. 4 CHENG 5 CHANG COMPLETED ANNEXATIONS: A = CARYN, B = MELCHER, C = AHMANSON, D = PULSAR, & E = BLACKMAN/HOMEST&W A EMS71NO CITY SPHERE OF INFLUENCE r" ^,� ITEM: UNIE'ERSTTROJET CITY OF Il UCAMONGA N PI<AN11Tin3Gz ION TITLE: VYC�iEXHIBIT:1lA :� NONE Ell e Lwnwr C. oo, IBM is .91$NW A" Flom ftwo 30 �I ~ 3� smc- 3 LEGEND SINGLE FAMILY 7200 SF = MINIMUM LOT SIZE SINGLE FAMILY 6000 SF = MINIMUM LOT SIZE TINGLE FAMILY 6000 SF = MINIMUM LOT SIZE PUBLIC (PARK & ELEM. SC-HOOL) COMMERCIAL NOTE: REFER TO DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS FOR DESCRIPTION OF ABOVE USES. CR 8&05 rM , UNIVERSITYICREST PROJEC _ OF CFI3CUCA1NdOVGA UNM PLAN DIVISION TITLE: PROPOSE® LAND USE EXHMM " "B" SCALE: NONE CrrY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA August b, 1990 Gretchen Stangl- Charlton Office of Planning 385 North Arrowhead Avenue, 3rd reloor San Bernardino. CA 92415 -0182 10500 Ciwc Canrrc Om.e. Post office 6o. W 11�.11411450.1441 Rancho Cucamong:7, California 91729 Faa� (-.,14114ti -A" SUBJECT: UNIVERSITY CREST POP W121 -494 MASTER TENTATIVE TRP:.`.T 14492 (UNiVERS::TY); TENTATIVE T!At;TS 14493 THROUGH 14499 14522 AND 14523 (UNIVERSITY). FINK DEVELOPMENT PLAN MAP (UNIVERSITY) MASTER TENTATIVE TRACT 14605 (CREST); TENTATIVE TRACTS 14606 THROUGH 14612 (CREST); AND FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN MAP (CREST). Dear Ms. Stangi- Charlton: If the above applications were being processed in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, they would be recommended for denial for the following reasons: 1. INADEQUATE TIME FOR REYIEH: Revised plans and maps were received on July 23, 1990. 2. 1NC_ONSISTENCIES AMONG THE PRELIMINARY PLAN .pF_DEVL,,1iMENT. THE Property Limits: Property boundaries are unclear. The boundaries on the Preliminary Plan of Development are not consistent with the Tract Map boundaries. For example, arterial and collector streets are not included within Tentative Tract Map beUndaries. Property ownership boundaries are not clearly indicated on the maps. Therefore it cannot be' determine, If - oll, part, or none of Day Creek is planned to be constructed on SCE property east of TT 14493, et al. School and Park Site: The Master Tentative Tract Maps do not include the school and park sites. At the -iery least, a separate Master Tentative Tract Map for the school and park sites should be added to the package of applications prior to approval of any of the a;rAications. E Format: The formatting of the subject applications is different for each application so that it N difficult or impossible to compare the tract maps to the preliminary and final plans of development. The plans and maps should be consistently formatted to fac0lotate review and plan checking. EXHIBIT "C" IJC.CIf111M1f.(h. r/ e taw. William I Alexander C arin I Briquet U Denni. L Strut NWfrah N Brown Pamela 1 Wo6ht lack Lim Aa P Rs. Stangl- Charlton RE: University Crest August 6, 1990 Page 2 Offsite Construction: Tentative Tract Map 14496 indicates that grading will occur on SCE property north of the site. Tentative Tract 14$12 indicates that road construction will occur on unidentified property east c. the site. (As an example of i! ,onsistency, this triangle is included as part of area H in the Preliminary Plan of Development.) These inconsistencies should be corrected. 3. LACK OF INFORMATION ABOUT RELATIONSHIP TO ADJOINING PROPERTIES. Also, grading and roads are proposed to be constructed on Southern California Edison corridors and surplus property. School facilities are proposed to be constructed on the MWD easement at the southeast corner of the University property. Written permission to plan and use these areas must first be obtained. Also, City policy encourages regional trails to be 1Qcated on existing San Bernardino County Flood Control District maintenance roads. Private Inholdinos: Day Creek Boulevard is proposed to be constructed through privately held parcels soutt, and east of the University site. This arterial street runs through on existing private residence. Provision to acquire right -of -way should be made. Further, the University maps wrap around adjoining parcels to the south and east of Tentative Tract 14522. The Route 30 corridor and Day Creek Boulevard will limit access to Vintage Drive. Althoun interior street access is indicated, a feasible plan of development should also be indicated to determine if the access would be adequate. An example of a feasibility study is included between TT 14497 and the school /park site where feasible street access and lot planning are indicated. Also, it is not clear whether Gay Creek Boulevard will be constructed substantially on University owned property or on the Southern California Edison corridor. This location for Day 'creek Boulevard in relation to site boundaries should be clarified. Adjacent Frooert2. The Rack Crusher Leasehold. The subject applications are adjacent to the Day Creek Wash on the west which is under a County contested lease to the Fourth Street Rock Crusher. The development proposal should discuss its relationship to the wash IN13 Ms'. Stangl- Charlton RE: University Crest, August 6, 1990 Page 3 area with and wit,rout the Rock Crusher. Particularly the feasibility and timing of extending roads across the Day Creek Wash should be addressed. Southern California Edison Surplus Property: A Southern California Edison surplus property of 55 acres separates the University from the Crest property. All 55 acres 'have been offered to the Caryn Company/ Canso rti um of Landowners for $40,000 an acre (Consortium meetilg of January 10, 1990). The applicant proposes to use 17 acres of this property to meet and slightly exceed the Quimby requirement of 3 acres per 1000. The land use proposed for the remaining 38 acres should he discussed and a feasible use plan indicated. The use of the remainder for perk and open space amenities above County requirements should be considered. Property to the East of the University Site: Tentative Tracts 13521 and 12659 are located east 4F the University site. The land uses for these tracts are 'sketchy and leave open areas which are not addressed as to use'b► +^essw No feasibility study is provided for the site south of Tentative Tract 12659. Construction and improvement of Manley Avenge is not addressed. Also, adp!:Rat; access for the site is not addressed. 4. FAILURE TO MEET CITY PLAMMIM STANDARDS: It should be noted that substantial potions ar the area for which the subject application has been submitted is designated As open space under the City Ceneral Plan and is currently being proposed to remain open space under the City's version of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan until an application for a General Plan Amendment is processed. City etaff invites a General Plan Amendment application which would be consistent with the County's General Plan designations (see item fg). Under the County's intensity of development, conditions reflecting City Standards have been prepared by the Planning Division and forwarded to you under separate cover. City standards include, but are not limited to, the hillside Development Ordinance. Also, the City's low density designation of 2 -4 units per acre is comparable to the County residential, up to 3 units per acre-, and that the City's very tow density designation of less than 2 units per acre is comparable tc the County designation of residential up to 2 units per acre. '- Ile Ms. Stangl- Charlton RE: university Crest August 6, 1990 Page 4 Therefore, it should be noted that City development standards for Low Density areas would require a minimum lot *ize of 7,200 square feet with an average lot size of 8,00 re feet and would not permit a minimum lot size of 6,000 syua.-e feet. And, for the Very Low Density designation. the City standard would require a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet and an average lot size. of 22,500 square feet and would not permit a minimum lot size of 7=200 square feet within tti s designation. (See attached Comparison of City and University Crest Development Standards.) 5. FAILURE TO MEET CITY ENGICEER ING STANDARDS: Conditions reflecting City standards have been prepared by the Engineering Division and forwarded to you under separate cover. The C',.y of Rancho Cucamonga Road Standards should be required f�,,r all streets. Particular attention is directed to City standards for special design streets which require an additional 7 -root average and a 5 -foot minimum be added to the ultimate 13 -foot parkway for landscaping before vaaching the perimeter wall of the tract, e.g., Day Creek ft-ltvard and Wilson Avenue. (See attached Comparison of City and University Crest Development Standar - ±s, Footnote 3.) 6. FAILURE TO_ MEET _CITY _BUILDING AND SAFETY STANDARDS: Comments reflecting City Building and Safety -requirements have been forwarded under separate cover. 7. k'ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARDS MUST BE REQUIRED: Conditions reflecting City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire District standards have been prepared by the Fire District and forwarded to you under separate cover S. INADEQUATE DESIGN CRITERIA: Ths subject applications are included within the Etiwands North Saezific Plan submitted to the County the week of July 2 through July 6, 1990. Specific design criteria including neighborhood identification and subarea design criteria are included in the Specific Plan. However, none of the subject applications reference the Specific Plan. The subject applications shoi►ld be subject to the Specific Plan design criteria upon approval of that Specific -plan. 9. INCONSISTENT OITH THE CITY GENERAL PLAN: As mentioned previously, the City General Pan desigation for the University property is open spaced This designation is consistent with correspondence received from the University of California regarding the educational use of the University Reserve System. It is also consistent with the exemption received by the university from property tax payments on the property which have been grand every year since the property was acquired in fi-1S Ms. Stangl - Charlton RE: University Crest August 6, 1990 Page 5 1977. Also, the existing City designation provides a buffer to the County appreved gravel mining and cement batch plant operation. This potentially conflicting land use should be resolvG1 before proceeding with any further land use Changes. A City General Plan amendmsn_ should be processed prior to approval for development being grantad by the County. It should be noted that the County General Plan Circulation Map is not consistent with the yity General Plan Circulation Map. The County's map should be brought into the City's map. The County's map should be brought in'd consistency with the City's map. Further, more discussirns should ue held among County staff, City staff, and the applicant to determine optimum circulation for minor callet_ ion streets, including Wit not limited to, Hanley Avenue. (See attached Street Pattern Study, July, 1r ).) 10. DENSITY ISSUES: City standards For Low and Vary Lots Density Residential development . would pot pern;it the density proposed for this project. 88.0515(a)(9) the applicant has requested a density transfer of 17 base units rslus a 2 -unit density bonus. The property is indicated as hiving limited dev."opment potential under the County General Plan, i.e., WFfPD -1/40. However, this request does not appear to meet the conditions for a density transfer under the Develepment Cade because the property is encumbered by physical hazards. Due to the st epness of the terrain, and the fact that a flood control easement CQ1prs the lower one- third of the property, the actual potential for development is virtually nil. The Forest Service has co6r4nted that pub"- access shout) be limited and that no impro-v3ments to the pv °iperty should be permitted. Therefore, if a density transfer is allowed, the " property should be preserved for undeveloped open space and all development rights should be removed from the parcel. The only use remaining to the property should be University sponsored research consistent with the University Reserve System Charter. Access W-14 be restricted to current node of access, e.g., undevalopc� use reails. The City calculation for the base density on the 573 acre parcel is 16 units. The rationalization for gran'4ing a density bonus on the transferred units is unclear and shou , be discussed in the POP. -1 e Inadequate .Justification for Density Bonus: The applicant is requesting a 10 percent density ALnus under Sectiot 88.0615(a)(3) of the Coutity Development Cade. The: do not appear to meet the minimum requirements to qualify for such i h-b v, L Ms.. Stangi- Charlton RE: University Crest August 6, 1990 Page 6 density bonus, neither in quality of design, or by amenities provided above requirements. However, since County staf" has ° agreed in concept to the 10 percent density bonus, the ,City requests that, if the City's objection is not considered and the bonus is granted, that the bonus provided be substantially equitable to the benefit received. Regarding project design. the only thing unusual about these applications is the lack of or -site amenities. This is a barely modified grid pattern of development. It lacks the curvilinear design features of the original concept plan. Tract interiors have no special ame,.ty features. For your convenience, a comparison of the original concept plan_ to the present plan, plus a third concept suggested by City staff is attached. City standards would - require a redesign of these maps. please note the internal pedestrian paseos and pedestrian Gaseos connecting to open space and to arterial and collector s1reets. At a min:ym,' the latter amenity should be added to the tract ,design. (� ,j attached Land Use Study and Street Pattern Study prepared for the City's Planning Division by RJM Design Group.) The reservation of land for school and park use is presented in the preliminary plan of development, but is only minimally addressed on the Master Tentative 14492 by reference to "future school /park site.° There iy no language or condition in the preliminary plan of development to ensure this basic amenity package. A 17 -acre park site is also discussed, but is even n.ire nebulous, because it exists on property that is owned by Southern California Edison and not the applicant. There are references to park improvements and to improvements to easements adjacent to park site in order to expand the effective area of the park sites. However, there are no conditions to quantify the 'area, quantify the level of improvements, or to j ensure that park improvements are provided as a condition of - granting a density bonus. C Virtually all trail amenities are located off -site on easements. There is no language or condition in the plan or maps to ensure construction of these amenities. The' first step would be for the applicant to obtain letters of permission to construct improvements from SCE, NWD, and the SBCFCD. Twenty - eight acres of recreation area are identified in the Preliminary Plan of development application, however, only 21.9 acres are proposed for dedicated park purposes. `Here is no analysis of where the six additional recreation acres will be provided. k /7 Ms. Stangl-Charlton RE; University Crest August 6, 1990 Page 7 4D � Also, while this would provide park levels within this planned development greater than three acres per thousand, it is unclear that the three acrd per thousand standard will be met if the cumulative park' requirement for the Etiwanda North area is considered.` To make a determination as tt whether the gross park requirement for Etiwanda NortH is m °t requires an analysis of the park requirements and provisions in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan which is just beginning toe County review process. The SCE surplus' property is available only as a 55- acre package.' The entire 55 acres should be considered as part of the amenities package qualifying this project for a density bonus. It is possible that other amenities such as donation of a school site, should also be considered. Landscape amenities which are provided are no greater than, would be required of any other plan of development. There have I-een.aral references to preservation of the 675 acre parcel within the national forest as justification of the density bonus. However, the University is, in effect, exchanging 165 acres of developable land, which ^ does not meet University Reserve System criteria, on which they are paying no taxes, and which has substantially appreciated in value since acquisition in 1977 for 675 acres of non- developable land which meets the University Reserve criteria; therefore, there is intrinsic value in the trade for the University. It should be noted that the density calculations should be revised to reflect the more accurate acreage calculations on the Tentativ- Tract maps. In the POP, density appears to have been inadvertently assigned to the park and school site. According to Pat Mc6uckian, County Devr,c;�ment Code Section, park and school sites, as well as commercial sites, must be subtracted prior is calculating density for a Planned Development application. In the POP the applicant is requesting a total of 119 bonus units plus 19 units for transfer for a combined total of 1,293 units. City calculation, based on tha more accurate tract map j acreage information, indicates a base density of only 1,142 I units which would yield 114 bonus units plus 17 units maximum for transfer from the orn space parcel for a combined total of 1 1,273 units. (See attached Density Analysis Tables.) The County is encouraged to review the density calculations. Whether or scoot the densities are revised, the County is also encouraged to give further consideration to the equity of'the value rec6,,..j -ram the proposed amenities package in return for granting a density bonus. If a density bonus is granted, it is i m Ms. Stangl- Charlton RE: University Crest August 6, 1990 Page 8 requested that the amenities package be firmly tied to the County approval process, and also that a ,stronger amenities ► package 14 a required of the applicant. Inadequate Justification for Transferring 0ensity from the Crest Subarea to the University Subarea: City policy desires that density decrease from south to north. That policy is not achieved by these maps. County policy requires clustering to preserve open space, such as preservation /enhancement of the two blue line streams that run through thesite. Open space is not being preserved on site. Therefore, no benefit to the County or to the City is occurring by transferring units from the Crest tract to the University tracts.' On the other hand, liabilities are occurring by concentrating , densities on the University tracts beyond their cipacity to receive density. Also, liabilities are occurring by concentrating density on the University, tract in comparison with densities allowed on adjoining property. The future (Route 30 Freeway will provide a natural barrier of the Victoria Planned Community to the south and Day Creek Channel and the Day Creek Wash provide natural barriers to the Caryn Planned Community to the crest. There is no barrier to property in the Etiwanda Specific Plan to the east which is designated Very Low Density Residential Use, less than two dwelling units per acre. Thus, the concentration of density o� the University tracts introduces a higher intensity land use into an area planned by the County for up to three units per acre and by the City for a Low and Very Low Intensity Land Use of less titan two.to three dwelling units per acre. This increase in intensity, in turn, creates a pressure to increase the intensity of use on adjoining parcels of land. 11. INADEQUACY OF THE COMMERCIAL SITE: The size and location of the proposed commercial site is not adequate according to City guidelines for commercial. development. A better location would be adjacent to the northwest corner of the intersection of the Route 30 Freeway and Day Creek Boulevard. This location would have more visible access and provide a buffer to residential development to the north, (3ee attached Land Use Study, July, 1990.) Experience has shown that approximately 15 acres is optimal for a neighborhood commercial center. Therefore, city staff would support a larger commercial site and oppose a site less than 10 net acres for commercial development. Furthea, the Preliminary Plan of Development List of Potential Uses includes a drive -in theater. The aforementioned use would not be appropriate and should be deleted from the list of potential uses. Ms. Stangl - Charlton RE: University Crest August 6, 1990 Page 9 be included in Design criteria for the commercial site should the preliminary and /or final plan of development. Resign criteria sho+lld be consistent with the design for the w surrounding residential development and with the neighborhood design theme in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. 12. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES: Seismic Studies Inadevuatet The City of Rancho Cucamonga has identified the Red Hill Fault Seismic Study Zone. The POP places a school and a park site within and adjacent to the fault zone, but trenching studies.were limited to a line approximating the alignment of Day Creek boulevard. Additionk.� trenching should be required prior to the approval of any plan. Traffic Studies Inade uates The draft Final EIR references only Kunzman ssociates traffic studies. Subsequent studies have been provided by OKS and Austin Faust Associates which should be referenced in the EIR. The City recognizes the Austin Faust , traffic mitigation measures as adequate to address City traffic impacts. The Austin Faust mitigation measure should, be circulates to Caltrans for comment on the adequacy of the regional witigation measures. Resource Management Plan Not Provided: Two USGS blue line streams will be closed according to the proposed plans of development for the subject applications. Mitigation measures will be required by the California Department Fish and Game and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service but have not been addressed. Mitigation Monitoring Plan Mot provided:- The mitigation measures in the EIR should, be reviewed for accuracy by all responsible agencies and a mitigation monitoring plan be prepared in order to establish the adequacy of implementation of the mitigation measures prior to approval of the subject plans and maps - Cumulative I" acts Inade uatelv_Addressed: The subject plans and ataps are Included in an application to the County for a Specific plans proposing 2,975 dwelling units. Additionally, an application for a 620 unit residential development and golf courae has been filed in the County which is immediately north of the site of these applications. Also, the Rock Crusher site is immediately west of the site of these applications. There will be significant cumulative impacts associated with these and other applications which must be adequately addressed prior to approval of this project. Alk 1i✓02 ® Ms. Stangl - Charlton RE: University Crest August 6, 1990 Page 10 Environmental YmDaet Resort Addendum Unavailable for Review: The County has requested that _an EYR addendum be prepared for the subject applications. As of this date, the addendum is not complete and has not been circulated for review. Failure to Circulate EIR A�fQendum for _Comment: Responsible agcdcies, including but na; Timited to the City, Caltrans, and California Department, of_,'A sh and Game, and U.S. Department Fish and Wildlife Servicu should have -an opportunity to comment on the adequacy of the EIR in the context of the cumulative impacts of the project. When the addendum is available for review, the City requesta recirculation of the final 'draft EIR together +cith the addendum to all responsible agencies for comment prior to approval for the,subject applications. 13. .1PPROVAL IS PREMATURE: Approval of the University;Crest plans and maps at this time is putting the cart before the horse in relation to the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. The applicants for the University /Crest proposals are also applicants for the Specific Plan s0mitted to the County. in July, 1990. The University /Crest proposal is included in the Specific Plan. The Specific P1 ,--� includes design criteria, backbone infrastructure plans, an_ other components necessary for the orderly development of this open and undeveloped area. The EIR for the Specific Plait will address the cumulative impacts of development which otherwise must be addressed piecemeal.., It is unlikely that development of the University /Crest property can occur until the issues raised in the Specific Plan are resolved including the need for a financial package, to pfvvide the required backbone infrastructure. - Therefore, approval of the, University /Crest tract should be postponed until the Specific Plan is approved. SUMMARY AND COi1CtUSY0N5: bused on the 13 major issues discussed above, City y staff would Ftave reconsended substantial redesign or denial of the _ University /Crest propolials if these applications had _been reviewed in the City. Because it appears as though only minor recisions are being requested by Cou:sty Staff, and the site is in the City's Sphere y of Influence, City sWf has prepared recommendations and conditions. I',am requesting that they be incorporated into the County list of conditions. *he City lists include conditions prepared by Planning, Engineering, and the fire District which have been forwarded under separate cover, as well as the attached list of additional conditions which reflect the issues discussed in this letter. MS . Stangl- Charltor, FE: University Crest August 6. 1990 Page 11 s, If you have any questions, please call Miki Bratt or myself at (714)1%. 989 -1861. 4 i re r Bra e Cit+ banner MB:sp Attachment: Requested Conditions ; Density Calculations Comparison Comparison of City and University Crest Development Standards Tract design Comparisons Land Use Study. duly, 1:990 Street Pattern Study, duly, 19911 cc: Sharon Hightower Pete Dangermond Joe DtIorio Land Plan Design Group I IX y, -j i i RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS FOR; UNIVERSITY CREST POP 'W?21 -49; MASTER TENTATIVE TRACT 14492 (UNIVERSITY); ,TENTATIVE TRACTS 14493 THROUGH 14498, 14522 AND 14523 (UNIVERSITY); FINAL DEVELOPMEA7 PLAN MAP (UNIVERSITY); MASTER TENTATIVE TRACT 14605 (CREST); TENTATIVE TRACTS 14606 THROUGH 14612 (CREST); AND FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN MAP (CREST), The Planning D'vision requests that as a minimum the following conditions be placed on the University Crest Plans and Maps. 1. CITY REVIEW. Applicant stiall submit al'. revisions,, plans, and maps to the City concurrently with submittals to the County and the County shall allow a minimum of four weeks for City's comment prior to County ;hearings or action. 2. CORRECT INCONSISTENCIES AMONG THE PRELIMINARY PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT. a. Property L .nits: Prior to Planning Commission hearing, clearly indicate property boundaries for all property in Preliminary Plan of Development. All property so indicated to also be clearly indicated and included in Master Tentative, Individual Tentative and Final Plan of Development. b. School and Park Site: Prior to approval of any Tentative Maps, a Tentative ract Map shall be submitted for the school and park site south of TT 14497. c. Format: Prior to Planning Commission hearing, rsvise format of Preliminary Plan of Development, Master Tentative Tracts, Individual Tract Naps and Final Development Plan to provide consistency among all submittals. d. Offsite Construction: Prior to Planning Commission hearing, utters of intent to permit sste alteration and also to permit proposed uses must be received from Southern California Edison, Metropolitan Water District,, San Bernardino County Flood Control District, and any other property owner so affected. Prior to issuance of first grading permit, agreements with aforementioned agencies must be completed and accepted by the Planning Department, and recorded with the County Clerk. 3. LACK OF INFORMATION ABOUT RELATIONSHIP TO ADJOINING PROPERTIES: a. i Southern California Edison (SCE ). Metro olitan hater District MWO and San ,Sernaedino Count pod Control District SBCFCD ern ss en to se ro it Prior to Planning Commission review.' a o intent agree ng to offsite uses and improvements must be obtained from alt affected agencies and property owners. Prior to recordation of the first Tentative Tract. Map, signed Recommended ConditiorS RE: University Crest August 6, 1990 Page 2 agreements with the aforementioned agencies must be obtained and recorded. These agreements must permit trail improvements, tra33 access, trail use, park improvement, park uses landscapinf; improvement, and fire plan maintenance. The term of th. agreement shall be for 50 years with provision for renewal. b. Private Inholdinas: Prior to issuance of the first grading permit, all arterial and collector road right -of -ways must be acquired. c. Development Feasibility for Adjoining Pre,%erty: Prior to Planning Commission review, provide circulation access and developmen,' feasibility studies for all adjoining pro,4erties, e.g. east Ld south of TT 14522; east of TT 14498, 14497, and school park site; north of TT 14498; north of I-r 1;496; SCE surplus property between Master Tentative 14492 and 14505; north of TT 14610; east of TT 14507; 14509; and 1e'510. d. Rock Crusher Leasehold. (See Planning and Engineering Division Conditions.) e. Southern California Edison Surplus Property: Prior to Planning Commission review, provide a development feasibility sWdy and circulation access for the entire 55 acre SCE surplus property. f. Property to the East of the University Site: Prior to Manning Commission review, indicate proposed extension of HantGy Avenue and relationship to school and park site, and also to TT 14497, and TT 14498. Also provide access to park site from TT 14491, the aforementioned access should be in the form of a pedestrian paseo. 4. City Planning Standards: (See Planninp Division Conditions.) a. City Hillside Develaoment Oro ,once: Prior to Planning Commission review, maps— — shall tie revised to conform to Ctty standard of development, including, but not limited to, minimum and averpgie lot sizes and the City Hillside Development Ordinance. b. City Develo Ment Code: Prior to issuance of first grading permit, pans sha be prepared which meet or exceed City standards as indicated in the City Code of Development, City. Standard Drawings, and other specific materials provided by the City Planning Division. S. City € gineering Standards: (See Engineering Oivisiou Conditions.) a. City General Plan Circulation Mpg,: Prior to Planning Commission review, all maps shall be revise., to conform to the City General Plan Circulation Map. 11 Recommended Conditions RE: University Crest August 6. 1990 Page 3 b. City Right -of -Way Standards: Prior to Planning Commission review, all maps sha11 be revised to conform to City Standards off. Development, including, but not limited to, right -of -ways for all arterial and collector streets, as well as an additional seven (7) feet average and five (5) feet minimum of landscaped parkway along each side of Day Creek Boulevard. c. City Development Code: Prior to issuance of the first grading permit, final grading plans, street plans, drainage plans, and landscape plans shall be prepared which shall meet or exceed City standards t-s indicated in the City Code of Development, Standard Drawings, and other specific material provided by the City Engineering uivisionF 6. City Building and Safety Standards: (See Building and Safety Division Comments. a. Prior to Planning Commission Approval for Master Tentative Map 14605, and Tentative tracts 14606 through 14612, plans shall be prepared which meet or exceed the requirements of the City Hillside Development Ordinance. b. Prior to Planning Commission approval for TT 14496, plans shall be prepared which meet or exceed the requirements of the City Hillside Development Ordinance. c. Prior to issuance of the first building permit for each tract, plans shall be prepared which ,shall meet or exceed City standards as indicated by the City Code of Development, City Standard Drawings, and other specific materials provided by the City Building and Safety Division. 7. CitX of Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Standardsa (See Fire District Conditions. 8. Design Criteria: In the matte:' of design, inc'.uding neighborhood design, landscaping materials, and product design, all final plans and maps V-.0 be consistent with the Etiwanda North Specific Plan as approve:i. All prelimin -ey plans and tentative maps shall be consistent with the draft Etiwanda North Specific Plan Architectural Design Criteria Section as submitted to the County for review, July, 1990. 9. Conformance with .City General Plan: The following conditions will bring the City ±ra P an and the County General Plan into conformance with the proposed preliminary plan of development. a. Universit Property: Prior to Planning Commission review, an application s4a 1 be submitted to the City for amendment to the General Plan for Master Tentative 14492 and TT 14493 throi;gh 14498. 1022, 14523 from open space to Low Density Resident'.lIal Use, 2 -4 units to the acre, as well as for a commercial site'yf Recommended Conditions RE: University Crest August 6, 1990 Page 4 not less than 10 acres net. It should be noted that City density is based on a gross /net calculation Which subtracts- acreage fbr arterial and collector streets. Therefore, the gross /net shall not exceed 3.999 dwelling units per acre. Prior to approval of the first Tentative Map, approval of the aforementioned General Plan application shall be obtained. b. School and Park Site, Summit Avenue: Prior to Planning Commission r -dew, an application shall be submitted to the City for General Plan Amendment for the school /park site from open space to school and park site. Prior to recordation of the first Tentative Map, approval of the aforementioned Cci�_ral Plan Amendment application shall be obtained. c. Southern California Surplus Property (55 acres ): Prior to Planning Commission review, an application shad be sutmitted to the City for General Plan Amendment for the SCE surplus. property from open space to par' site and other use to be determined. Prior to approval of the first Tentative Map'. approval of the aforementioned General Plan _ Amendment aG,.acation soall be obtained. d. Caren Property: Prior to Planning Cofmr2sion review, an applications shall be submitted to the Ciay for General Plan Amendment for TT 14611 and 13612 from open apace and low density residential uie to v2ry 'for density residential use, less than 2 dwelling units per acre. Prior to approval of the first Tentative Map, approval of the aforementioned General Plan Amendment application shall be obtained. e. Circulation Plan: Prior to Planning Commission review or prior to approval of the first Tentative Map, the County Circulation Map shall be amended to confonv to the City Circulation Map. Also, the applicant, Count staff, and City staff shall confer and determine the optimum circulation design for minor collector streets, including but not limited to. Hanley Avenue. Tract maps shall be redesigned as necessary prior to Planning Commission review. 10. ?ensill a. 675 Acre Parcel: Prior to recordation of the first Tentative Map, the University of California Reserve System shall obtain clear title to the 5754scre parcel within the National Forest with deed restrictions as follows: * all development rights are forgone forever; * use shall be limited to research under the provisions o' 1%P University of Taliforrla Reserve System Charter; l Recommended Conditiors RE: University Crest August 6, 1990 Page 5 * all access' shall be limited to undeveloped use trail or trails. '± b. 55AAcre Southern California Edison Site: Prior to recordation of .he first Tentative Map, the applicant shale enter into a purchase agreement with SCE for the entire SCE site. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the applicant shall complete the purchase of the site and submit a development plan for the entire SE -a °re site to the Planning Department for approval. Park development for the site shall be consistent with City standards for park improven-�nts. Prior to issuance ref the 323rd building permit, the 17 -a.re site shall be deeded to the County. Prior to issuance to the 646th building permit, the applicant, at the applicant's expense, shall complete improvements for 17 acres of the aforementioned park site. Also, provision for park maintenance shall be provided by the applicant either by means of a Homeowner's Association or a Landscape Maintenance District. Prior to issuance of the 969th building permit, the applicant shall deed the remainder of the site east of Day Creek Boulevard to the County. Also, at the applicant's expense. park improvements shall be completeO for the aforementioned portion of AWL the site and provision for r.1, maintenance shall be provided by the applicant either by means of a Homeowner's Association or a Lane-:ape Maintenance District. Also, prior to the issuance of the 969th building permit, the applicaot shalt also complete landscape improvements for the area west of Day Creek Boulevard and include maintenance by means of a Homeowner's Association or a Lanertape Maintenance District. c. Park Site. Summit Avenue (approximately 4.9 acres): Prior to recordation of the first Tentative Map, the applicant shall deed the site to the County Parks Department. Prior to issuance of the 323rd building permit, the applicant, at the applicant's expense, must complete improvements for the aforementioned park site plus additional improvements of approximately four (4) additional acres extending the affected park site access the SCE easement to Day Creek Boulevard, all in accordance with City standards for park improvementr. d. Trail Amenities: Prior to recordation of the first Tentative ract Map, signed agreements with the SCE, MWD, and SBCFCD must be obtained And recorded permitting trail improvement, trail access, trail use, and trail maintenance. Prior to issuance of the 323rd building permit, all trail improvements shall be completed in accordance with City Trail Standards. Trail maintenance shall be provided by a Homeowner's Associati ^a or a Landscape Maintenance District. Thi term of the agreemen. shall be Tor 50 years with provision for renewal. '-a 7 Recommended Conditfons RE: University Crest August 6, 1990 Page 6 Tract maps shall be redesigned to include internal pedestrian trail amenities. At a minimum, pedestrian paseos shall be,. provided to connect to open space areas, community trails, and to collector and arterial streets. e. Prior to Planning Commission review, the density calculations in the POF tables shall be revised to reflect the more accurate acreage calculations on the tract maps, and no density shall be calculated for the school, park, and commercial sites. f. Export of Units from the Crest Subarea to the University 5ubarea: Because the negative effects of intensifying use within the University subarea outweigh the positive effects of reducing density in the Crest subarea, no export of units from the Crest subarea to the University subarea shall be allowed. Therefore, prior to Planning Commission review, all maps shall be revised accordingly. 11. Commercial Site: Prior to Planning Commission review, the :zon.- ercial site shall either be relocated adjacent to the Route 30 FreEway and Day Creek Boulevard and increased•to a minimum net 16 acres or shall be increased to 10 minimum net acres and TT 14494 revised accordingly. Prior to recordation of TT 14494, plans for the Commercial site shall be completed in conformance with City standards and shall be consistent with design guidelines in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan as appr;4ed. On an interim basis, the aF-3rementioned plan shall be consistent with the Etiwanda North Speci`Ic Plan as submitted to the County, July, 1990. 12. Environmental Issues: a. Seismic Study: Prior to issuance of the first grading permit, seismic studies shall be completed within the Red Hill Fault Study Zone as identified by the City. The proposed school and park sites shalt be specifically investigated. if evidence of active faulting will prohibit the use of the school site, then an alternative site acceptable to the Etiwanda School District crust be found and acquired by the applicant and maps revised prior to recordation to the first tentative map, b. Traffic Mitigation Plan: Traffic mitigation measures shall conform to the Wustir Faust Traffic Study. (See Engineering Conditions.) Also, prior to Planning Commission review, Caltrans shall review and comment on the Traffic Mitigation Measures proposed by the EIR addendum. c. Resource Management Plan; Prior to issuance of the first grading permit, a resource management plan shall be completed with consultation from the California Department of Fish and Game and the U.S. Department of Fish and Wildlife also, 2601 and 404 permits shall be obtained from the California Department of Fish and Game and the U.S. Corps of Engineers. Thak ;aforementioned Resource Management Plan shall be consistent with the City's Resource Management Plan a� a provgd,r Recommended :ondi`Yons RE: University Crest August G, 2990 Page 7 - d. Mitigation Monitoring Rlan; Prior to recordation of the first tract map, or issuance of the first grading permit, whichever / tomes first, a mitigation monitoring plan shall be prepared by staff and /or the environmental consultant who prepared the EIR. The afor°mntioned plan shall establish the adequacy and timing of imp(ementation of the mitigation measures as approved by the Board of Supervisors. e. Cumulative Impacts Discussion: Prior to Planning Commission review* all cumulative impacts shall be adequately reviewed in the addendum to the EIR. Cumulative impacts include, but are not limited to, all applic,)tions of development currently on file in the County within the Vancho Cucamonga Sphere of Influence, i.e., the Etiwanda North Ccttsortium of Landowners` application for General Plan Amendment and Preliminary Plan of Development for the San Sevaine Wash area; and the Etiwanda Heights Development Corporation Preliminary Plan 3f Development for the area east of the Oak Summit proposal. f. Addbndum Review: prior to final Development Review Committee review, the addendum 'to the final EIR shall circulate for review and comment ::o County staff and to all responsible agencies, including, but not limited to Caltrans and the City. 13. Approval Timing: final review by the Development Review Committee and subshquent consideration by the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors shall be continued until the first day following approval of the Wwanda North taecifit Plan submitted to the County in July. 1990. The a;.plicant_ shall agree to this provision in writing. MB:sp Ka9 OPEN 1 aea.�gt �.�� e�a�av��asaT� cxz�s� a�v�=.aPrn�avr� 6$��raa��as PRIVATE RXSD JXIAL LAND 'USE, R9ESIGATION CITY UCPUD ° STANDARDS VL L Plan. Area A -D Plan.Asea E-I Plan"Area 8; LOT AREA I Avg. ' 22,5'^"f 5,000 Min. Net 20,000 7,200 6,000 6,000 7,200 1 Arterzal I 20Avg.18M1n. NIR DUs. /AC. Up to 2 Up to 4 Up to 3 Up to 3- Up to 2 MI& DU 1000 SQ. 1000 SQ. 120b SQ. FT. � 1200 SQ. FT. 1200 SQ. FT. I SIZE FT. FT. i 1 LOT DIMEN Min. Width i 90Avg. 65Avg. { I 54 Min. 55 Min. 55 Min. 10Var. 5Var. N/R NIR NIR Corner Lot 100 70 NIR N/R NIR Lot Depth 150 I 70 t N/R N/R Id /R Min. 4 I Frontage 50 40 X/R N/R N/R Min. Flag Frontage 30 20 N/R NIR t; N/R 2 SETBACKS Front Yd. 'Avg. 37Avg. 23.5Avg. 31.5 31.5 10Jar. 5Var. 24.5 Min. 24.5 Min, 24.5 Min. id on Gar. S E Gar. G (Side on v ( Side on Gar. ev I 16.5) 16.5) 16.5) Side ( 27 27 15Loca! 25C011. I 15Local 25Coll 15Local 25Coll. { Side 10 /15 5/10 ; 5/5 60 ° >Lot5 /10 5/560` >Lot5 /10 5/5 60' >Lot5 /10 I) Rear , 30 20. 15 15 15 Int.Bd ° DU /Acsry.1 30/5 20/5 N/n NIR N/R f BUILDING HIEGLT 35 35 35 35 35 BUILDING COVERAGE 1 2S% 40% 405 40k 40% OPEN 1 !PACE PRIVATE /2nd.Flr)'2C00 /NR 1000 /NR N/R MAJOR ST.` SETBACKS Arterzal I 20Avg.18M1n. NIR 4 Collector 18Avg.15M1n. + NIR 6 11 2 STANDARDS LOT APEA MIN LOT WIDTH MIN LOT_ DEPTH BLDG. HGT. BLDG. SETBACKS 3 COMMERCIAL LAND USX CITY I UCPUD NEIGMWRHOOD COMMERCIAL i COMMERCIAL 5 Acrou for a Neighbor- hood Shopping Center 30OFT. ZOOFT. 26FT.. Within lOnFT. of Residential. Other 40FT. Arterial I ' from face of ultimate curb. Parking 301. Land - 3 scaping 45Avg.w /30'Min. ,:ollector/ Local St. '35 from face of ultimate 'curb. Parking 259. Land - iscaping 34Avg.w /25Min. Rear PL Adjacent to Residential. 1201 Bldg. /101 Parking /10 ILandscapir_g. Interrior 1 Side PL t Adj. to Res.I20' Bldg. /10' Parking /10 I Landscaping. N/R 9.39 gross ac, proposed with no limitation on j parcels or master plans requirement. jl N/R I N/R I 35FT. f 20' from ROW (Parking N /R. Land - ff scaping Al /'R. N/R N/R i NIP N/R MIR PARKING 1/250 GFA 1/200 GFi' I FOOT NOTRS 1. Der: i,; calculations between the City and the County are not the same. The City deducts the for major streets parks, sc'lools etc., while the Countv incluzss these areas for the purposes of density calculation. 2. Setbacks ir, the City are measured from the face of the ultimate curb location, therefore the UCPUD setbacks were adjusted accordingly. 3. Setbacks in the City are measured from the face of the ultimate curb with result that along major streets like Day Creek an additional '7 feet average 5 feet minimum to the ultimate 13 fcot parkway for a 6 lane arterial per City standr.rd ( 2201 ROW, 94' curb to curl with 13' park- way) needs to be added for landscaping before reaching the Tract bound- ary wall. On collector streets like Banyon an additional ?' average 41•minimum reeds to be added to the 11' wide parkways, (P7 /:: ?V9UC2) Page 2 ,of 2 O pcp 0 U C a LU Q U Q W a a E 0 a 0 a 6 a H L'J m V Q Y �L U �C a m ro PPn.. F E 0 D m � e � y F p .0 N tlF < @ l�yW� y ~ LU W �tti� tw7N WW (4p _h ax ae C O N~ N x."' EJ ~ a a � H �' t°• �� W Gs v h uT r tO Y t[f � h m co C7 w n N r• W w a P e[f Po n n mf p N V N Ln N n' p N m co W ° W FH G w D p Y1 m¢ of N N p w tR A h N m N p. Ply 01 f m G7 N B N co m N m 6 Q f N F N N ca f U w go 10P m in p ^ N p t0 ^ O pW. N a caf FP N co m p m p B cc .0 w co 11 N N N f H w a p. W C � E 0 a 0 a 6 a H L'J m V Q Y �L U �C a m ro PPn.. F E 0 D N m a °a 0 V p U Q a G r a n a e N Q Y a to 7 a 9 a Q N r 0 + 3 ul y of QN n d m 2o u7 W y FSy yy�p a y c =aN m.. .. V rn a �a -2- o zttl a _e vn m !°-CL o F ^�3 Q IV I v to m � r Q P w P Qt to 0 ra e v m N V r f 6 W r < 9 g t W C Q a r tll W Q V N Q W N m a °a 0 V p U Q a G r a n a e N Q Y a to 7 a 9 a Q I � § \ � $ k d k § M A-'—�171 . "It C, k t ) k k k � � k 2 CL a k � j 2 � f ■M k . §/ « � §■� .� B ,� _ §� -£ Ck � \� /� �� \ k kkk \ �.)§§ 2@® . % % « q # m ■ � - - 2 r _ Go � § «22 (f _§§ E -.- - �Bt § �■ � �� �. I& mc § - § § # l4vo c . _. § ®� # ■ -- ■ . ; , CCL k 2� § 51 A-'—�171 . "It C, k t ) k k k � � k 2 CL a k � j 2 � f ■M k I . AND-PLAN DESIGN GROUP Augl1SL; 1, i 990 t+�,�����n�M�.. tr'nahnnu „. ri16, �iL.l' '+ ., THUG .” Is. Gretchen Stangl- Charlton Office of Planning 6 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 385 N. Arrowhead Avenue, 3rd Floor San Bernardino, CA 92415 -0182 RE: University/Crest Job No.: UCP 726.1 - Dear Ms. Stangl - Charlton: Following is an item by item response to questions raised by Brad Buller in his letter to you dated August 6, 1990. Each comment by the City is listed and followed by a response from the applicant. 1. INADEQUATE TIME FOR REVIEW: on July 23, 1990. Revised plans and maps were received Initial submittal of the Tentative Tract Maps to the City of Rancho Aft Cucamonga occurred between September 1989 and March of 1990 with the Preliminary Development Plan submitted to the County, and available for review in April of ,1950. While other submittals were made to the County on Tune 18 and ruly 23, 1990, these contained only minor changes from the original City submittals. 2. INCONSISTENCIES AMONG THE PRELi1VIINARY PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT. THE MASTER 1ENTATIVE ACTS THE FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS THE INDIVIDUAL TRACE M S: Property Limits: Property boundaries are unclear. The buundates.on the Preliminary Plan of Development are not consistent with the Tract Map _ boundaries. For example, arterial and collector streets are not included within Tentative Tract Map boundaries. Property ownership boundaries are not clearly indicated on the maps. Therefore, it cannot be determined if all, part, or none of Day Creek is planned to be constructed on SCE property east of IT 14493, et al. The City should refer to the Master Tentative Tract Map for Property boundaries. These items have been addressed as or the August 8, 1990 DRC at the County. School and Park Sitr: The Master Tentative Tract Maps do not include the school and park sites. At the very least, r- separate MasterTentative Tract Map for the school and nark sites should be added to the package of applicatious prior to approval of "any of the applications. 34 Executive Park, Suite 150 I Irvine. California 92714 1 (714) 4744200 ! FAX: (714) 4744209 Ms. Gretchen Stangl- Chariton COUNTY OF SAN iiERNARDINO UCP t { 726, Pape 2 8121/90 IJ Ash Current Master Tcntativa Maps include the school and park sites. Eormat The formatting of thc,;subject applications is different for each application so that itts difficult or impossible to compare the tract maps to the l,reliminzry and finai plans of development. The plans and maps should be mmsistendy formatted to AAC11itate rev €rw and plan chocking. e Wt., agree with the City 's aommants on format that it is sometimes dif, rcult to compare plans. However, the County has specific req- irements twat use different formats for tentative and prelr winaryllZaal development plans which we are following. Offs9t , Const uc on: Tentative Tract Map 34496 indicates that grading will occur on SC.E property north of the site. Tentative Tract 14612 indicates that rOLd constmction will occur on unidentified property cast of th -site. (As an example of inconsistency, thcs triangle is included as part. of area H in the Preliminary Plan ofDevelopment.) The-4e inconsistercies should be corrected, I Pk'e8s- note, the Southern California Edicon surplus property in question is planned to be purchased by the applicant. Property issues have heett addressed since the Augue 8, 19 .00 .URC. 3. LACK OF INFORMATYQN ABOU FLATIONSgiP TQ ADJ_OINING PROPERTIES. APft ava kern i ai'farm disorE.(SC�,�etlo�nl9ta ater District (MM and Sn ernardrna !~runtyi�od Control fistrict (iBCFCbI Permission to Plan for their PzV ert, The University Property is virtually surrounded by Southern Califomia Edison power canidors. Improvement and amenities are proposed fo r the Southern California Edison cotriaars and surplus property. Also; grading and roads are proposed to be constructed on Southern California Edison corridors and surplus property. ' hoot facilities are proposed to be constructed on the MWD' easement at the :southeast corner of the University property. Written Permission to plan and v w ` AW areas trust first be obtained. Also, City policy encourages regional traits to be located on existing San Bernardino County Flood Control District maintenance roads, SCE - The applic8nt is platning to purchase the surplus SCE property and has rcceived.a sales agreement from SCE. Within the SCE corridors, road 0rossings sad use of saavice roads for trails are proposed. ScV4ral meetings with SCE have occurred and formal approvals tree anticipated in the neat two to three months. The applicant is not opposed to being conditioned for these approvals prior to the recordation of Final kips. 1tfW.tD -Whey have received our plans and conceptuallpyagred to the proposed use: AI-3� r -a the ppp,p- tt °ttst•'pa� � $ Ps c cx fro ey�`tO Ro`� t►ct $ p`.�i a rho S�aaV, ea (Of aea� tcd tc`� cc�� ` seat sea s is tae a �o''0`c`°� '� 200. °` I �26e�Qt1 is 4ts$ tg, 4coQ, cts'�ytoacQ°'t this se� teas Svice; °pet tt `cvacaoCt•°c 4 y's+,a sta °o si °8h s tcg boot rcc °t� �`a gc$a aim a i Yt$o. ay Gtcso�`'tY +a�c�`ac °'�tAgc sad %°a a Gv Yscc oar° t�`5 Qo� e ® tO N- c9tc set '4109, 0,10 a �eea� s�.o8 spa st Qatcc� c ;taS�a 0 �tcey ®.�- ept o���og�a�a�c$toc�� 4 ate co m aaS3 �pc Stc�`ztc�`aCA a.o`` $'o° t''kltl ` o�.s 8b� R` this aco °agp cA tctot tO a eoc`° e °t4 a �' tb° sttce s�,`O °` vtttb s��a��9 o eo�a,cs °f eat' °o `say egret try ca , P�tso'Oee.Cltsttcei�JiGCv$pC eevas� ° s wf! tort• %, ;v cte c�� O o , i p ev ev'i tov, ��° tc tit cf NLAc X01 %ve `ov o4 eft I'hotqlhc:%V0 ', -t t?A y G� ' tpaiea J° �ot�etac�f a °v Pt` t s t c�cac vccs•�j to'. �1btc1► 15, 00 tc• o,J o� gyp. p 5 ere beeQ sae b° . es ° on �eo� a4 09 v Cc o�e8I �atb � �.a aot. G`'�, a tstt�e a ea c° eA�9 catca�ca s one ov�abp stet o upstta t 0� 1 fit. enonsttsc. css of Ids �,t c ccott° e10" catty silt ,aia • eote` i+o me t tos' et to gip, pteygta gs�ty a ,aof l s -0o a ftl. c a4Doty °�e1 � ,abc o¢dtpg '° C,t ;tl Yt °4 "Nepo &eta �'��at' tis' sut4 �4a� t S1eltvets o a' eesscot�C Gt�c� et t° @s °t stste� s Qp c .4t c c5t�ba�ve�v tip ScIDay C�06 tits �� tg �° 9st°obct a ac t te'e�N ,mac rho ctos' °eV t°�� 1165 60 G00 r te8. c cK�Gt��vi. �c°a�a b $tt 'VI �teA pe0 �` b °,� s Gc `ec�4 �SbatEe c° Foo �8b1 sus sole 'ftip , s° a"� - ,Au t� ° tcsaAtess t °o seYISO- Y�{0 G�fec art a too of �►t G4o ct °55 ~` _ vct °gym pvcntl��G o5 ttoaa5 t° its° tae 00% tb s the ° j(A ,j J ;` I Ms. Gretchen Stangt- Charlton COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO L ;P 726.1 age 3 13/21/90 'Regional Trails - ''Wll be addressed further as part of the EtiWanda North Spt;lia`c plan. It is intended to utilize existing service roads as regio,val trails. This is identified in the Final Development plan. Private IabglrlLaa: Day Creek 1r aulevard is proposed to ue constructed' through privately held parcels south and east of the University site, Thisarterial street runs through on existing priv. fs residence. Provision to acquire right -of way should be made. We agree with this comment and are mmoviag forw.srd on this effort. i i Further, the University maps wrap around adjoining parcels to the south and east of Tentative Tract 14522. The Route 30 corridor and DayCreek Boulevard will limit access to Vintage Drive. Although interior streetaccess is indicated, a feasible plan of development should also be indicated to determine if the access would be adequate. An e:sample of a feasibility study is included between TT 14497 and the schoollpark site-where feasible street access and lot planning; are indicated. Also, it is not clear whether Day Creek Boulevard will be constructed substantially on University owned property or on the Southern California Edison coridor. This location for Day Creel: Boulevard in relation to site boundaries shoui; ?be clarified. Refer to the current Master Tentative Maps which indicate this information. Day Creek Roulevsrd will be constructee* .completely on University Property, daCMt Proz�erty. The Rock Crusher Leasehold. The ;u" "eject application; areadjacc .to thw Day Creek Wash on the west which is under a County contested lease _, ,he Fourth Street Rock Crusher. The development proposal should d' uxtss its relatianshdp to the wash area with and without 'the. Rock Crusher. r?artitularly the feasibility and timing of extruding roads across the Day Creek Wash should be addressed. The effect" of the Fourth Street Rock Crusher to surrounding development are addressed by that :Eaviranurerrtsl Impact Repot±, Wilson Avenue ertena,'Cft across Day Creek lk"h is consistent' with the County's GeQCrai Plan. Banyan Avenue extension is implied the County's General Plan. The Rock Crusher coal'' iWO allows these roads to cross through the leasehold area. Ms. Gretchon Stangl- Charlton COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO UCP 726.1 Page 4 8/21/90 Southern Califomia dison uwk1 ► Mpertv. A Southem California Edison s surplus property oF55 acres a- para(A the University from the Crest,oroperty. All 55 acres have been offered to the Caryn Company /Consortium of Landowners for $40,000 an acre (Consortium mesti7g of January 10, 1990). The applicant proposes Co use 17 acres of this;roperty to meet and slightly exceed the Quimby requirement of 3 acres pet 1,000. The land use proposed - r the remaining 38 acres should be discussed and a feasible use plan indicated. The use of the remainderfry park and Oren space amenities above County requirements should be considemd.' The applicant intends to purchase the entire SS acres# The remaining 38 acres will be designated as natural open ; apace, unless the Etimt ada Community Rub does not mate'.ialize resulting in the 33 acres u< bF utilized as a community level park as part of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. The University /Crest Planned Development in buying the entire SS acres and improving approximately 17 acres as well as improving an additicnal 4 -5 acre park next to she school, will absorb dollars Per unit approximately two times as high as the City park fee. In addition, this project provides a S acre 1,000 population �iark standard exceeding by nearly 7096; the City park requirement klf 3 acres per 1,000 population. P_ronertv to the East of the University Site: Tentative tracts 13527 and 1263 11 are located east of thaiJniversity site. The land uses for these tracts are sketchy and lmve open areas which are rot addressed as to use or access. No feasibility study is provided for the site south of Tentative Taact 12659. Construction and improvement of Hanlgy Avenue is not addressed. Also, adequate access for the site is not addressed. The City raises questions about certain tracts which arc not a part of this application. Hanley Avenue is not needed for access to the project tracts. IfHaaleyis provided, then the street crossing the SC.E corridor from Day Creek is not needed. 4. ,4UA. R.E TO MEET CITY P aN: TING ST ARD It should be noted ;drat substartial portions of the area for which the subject applications has been submitted is designated as open space under the City General Plan and is currently being proposed to remain open space under the City's version of the Etiwanda North'upeciGc Plan until an application for a General Plan Amendment is processed. City staff invites a General Plan Amendment application whir* acv °4 be consistent with the Count,-?s General Plan designations (see itein #9y. K -38 �'i 1 Ms. Gretchen Star*gl•Chariton COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO UCP 726.1 Page 5 821/90 3 The County General Plan has this area identified as Res -3, which t is the basis ofour plan. The City ofRancho Cucamonga has been aware fora number of years of the univtirsity's ultimate plan to sell this (area for development units in order to fund open space acquisitions as part of the Ui :.rersity's Natural dcsource .F, stem. As state, we arc prepared to submi' a General Plan Amendment application as a courtesy, but believe it more efficient to do so with the.ctiwanda North Specific Plan. Under the County's intensity of developm°at, conditions reflecting City Standards have been prepared by the Planninj Division and forwarded to you ,ender separate cover. City standards include, but are not limited to, the Hiliside Development Ordinance. Also, the City!r low density design�ition of 2-4 univ-t per acre is comparable to the County residential, up to 3 units per acre, and that the City's very low der_sity designation of le,s than 2 .units per acre is comparable to the County designation of residential up to 2 units per acre. Within a DRC meeting at the County, County staff indicated that this project conforms to the City Hillside standare'j. Therefore, it should be noted that City development standards for Low Density areas would require a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet with an average lot size of 8,000 square feet and would not permit a tninimv � jot, size of 6,000 square feet. And, for the Very Low Density designation, the City standard would require a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet and an average lot size of 22,500 square feet and would not permit a minimum lot size o f 7,200 square feet within this designation. (See attached Comparison of City and University CrestDevel6pment Standards.) City SWa rcontinues to c1cr t& its development code as the basis for its ; nalysis. This,z'roject is a PD and much like the City's Planned Communities (2-C's), it creates standards tailored to the individual site, In the Etiwanda North mcetina; hosted by Jon 1rfikels, Mayor Dennis Sto+rt indicated large p 'ects should be - looked at on a case by case brsia and new star—ards develoked that a4 a site specific. The University /Crest Preliminsry Development Plan reflects a clustered design generating no addition4l units than would be achieved by using the City's standards. !"he clustered design reflects the desire of the City of Rancho CVcamonga's pP aning Commission to have a greater variation in lot sizes, w.. lot sizes inc,?easing from south to north. Ms. Gretchen Stang! - Charlton LJUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO UCP 726.1 Page 6 8/2 V0 5. FAILURE TQ MRFI CITY ENMEERiNG STANDARI3 : Conditions reflecting City standards have been prepared by the Engineering Division and forwarded to you underseparate cover. The City of Rancho Cucamonga Road Standards should be required for all streets. Paiticular atteritien is directed to City standards for special design streets which require an additional 7 -foot average And a 5 -foot minimum to he added to the ultimate 13' -foot parkway for landscaping before reaching the ptrimeter wail of the tract, e.g., Day Creek Boulevard and Wilson Avenue. (See attached Comparison of City and University Crest Development Standards, T:-ootnote 3.) A detailed comparison of the City's standards r;-ere made. City standards were used except in a few canes where County staff determined that County Standards were more appropriate. We believe the meet or exceed City parkway standards and would be happy to reviews the appropriate plans. 6. FAT TO MEET CITY BCBILDING AND SAFE'' STANDAMS: Comment reflecting City Building and Safety requir scents have been forwarded under separate cover. We have not r, ceived these comments. Fn addition, we believe we are meeting hv, -Idiag and safety standards. 7, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STAN _A=$ IUST REQUIRED— Conditions reflecting the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District standards have been p epared by the Fire District and forwarded to you under separate cover County staff City staff have been coordinating aver the past several months. We will comply with .hest standards as agreed between City and County as we ur.,JWwstard them. We would like to note, this project is within the only CFD of the Rancho Cucarwonga Fire Protection District that pays for both the capital and operational costs at a level satisfactory to provide the necessary services. 8. INA Z¢UATE DESIGN CRITF—R A: The subject applications are included within the Edwanda North Specific PIrn submitted to the County the wet %k of July 2 through July 6, 1990. Specific design criteria including tteighborhood identification and subarea design criteria are included in the Specific Plan. However, none of tl:t subject applications reference the Specific Plan. The subject applications should it subject to the Specific flan design crited 1 upon approval of that Specific a',an. The Final Development Plans include specific design criteria, Such approved criteria will be included into the Etiwanda North, Spccilr`c Plan. �V E Ms. Gretcheit Stangl•Cnarl(on COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO UCP 726.1 Page 7 8121/90 s 49. INCONSISTENT WITH THE CITY GENERAL PLAN, As mentioned previously, the City General Plan designation for the University property is open space. This designation is consistent with thc.cormspoedence received from the University of California regarding the educational use of'se University Reserve System. It is also consistent with the exemption received by the University from ptopetty tax payments on the property which have been granted every year si ice the property was acquired in 1977. Also, the existing City designation provides a buf:er to the County approved gravel mining and cement batch plant opdrution. This potentially conflicting land u;e should be resolved before proceeding with any further land use changes. A City General Plan ,amend tent should be proce�.:sed prior to approval for development being ,granted by the County. The County General l'e'an as ,previously noted, indicates Res -3 for Me site. The tivversa `y of California has, over ibe years, made several public oral znd written statements regarding their objectives for their properties. We believe the tax exempt status for the property is appropriate until it is clear that 'Sc property is allowed to be developed. It should be Meted that the County General Plan Circatlation Map is not consistent witi� the City General Plan Circulation Map. The County's map shout • be brought into :onsistency with the City's map. We would suggest that he City match &c County's Circulation Plan. We behove that our traffic reports and the City's conclude that the County's Galan is more pprapria:c Further, more discussions should he;!.,3j )ng County staff, City staff, and the applicant to determine ootirgum circu,atioit for minor collector streets, including but not limited to, i,.4niey.- lveaue. (See attached Street Pattem Study, July, 1990.) We would be happy to pa. <cipate in any further circulation discussions. 10. DENSITY ISSM: City standards for lAw a ad Vey Low Density Residential development would not permit the density pripostd for this project.. We believe we can develop this property at the densety proposed in the Preliminary Development Plan and me( t t6c City's lot size requirements, although as indicated in our previous comment uud -r item #S, this project is a Planned Development and has standards tailored Fo the design of the project as a whole. If we were to have one continuous lot size for ail density areas the project could meet City !of size requirements but this would provide a homogeneous and iaActior plan to the one proposed. 1 Ms. Gretchen Stangi- Charlton COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDIN® UCP 726,1 Page 8 8/21/90 Ina-dectiate u j, ' jZensit from the Unocr 675 Acres to the University Subarca: Under Sectwn 88.0515(a) (2) the applicant has requested a 6,-nsity transfer of 17 base units plus a 2; unit dens-."y bonus. The property is indicated as having limited development potential under the County Ganerai Plaa, v..e,, WF/PD -1/40. however, this requc %t does not app--if to meet the cordiWoAs for adensity tcansf -r under the DevrjAVment. Corte because the property is enar mbered by physical hazards. Due to the steepn zr�; of the terrain, and the fact that a flood control easement covers the!ower one -.'&J of the property, the actual potential for development ; is virtually n'... fhe Forest Service l;ns commented tf at public access should be limited and that no improvements to the property should be permliSed. Therefore, if a riensity'ransfer is allowed, the property should be preserved foi urdeveloped open space and all development rights should be removed Prow the parcel. The only use remaining to the property should be University sponsored research consistem with he. University Reserve System Chi :ttc Accessshould be iestricted to current mode of access, e.g., undeveloped use trails. The City calculatio-a for the base density on the 675 were parcel is 16 units. The ra_ ::,naliaation for slanting a density bonus on the trmfetTed units is unclear and should be discu:.sed in the PDP. Development constraints pan the properW zre not signifi-coat At ieast 19 lots could certaialy be developed on the 675 ,arses (I duf34 acres). Regardless of the Jere] of ,developr ear., all the property wou!d be privately owned egad publcc access completely Illegal. The 695 acres will be Maintained as permement ,open space. We do .not bslieve u two or three unit hnnus 9n return for the 675 acre open snare is iaspprooriate. Inadequate lMgfloggn for D MDonus ; The application is.'-questing a 10 percent density bonus under Sectio i 88.0515(a) (3) of the Count) Devidoptoent Code, They do not appear to meex tht: minimum requirements to. quadifY :or such a density bonus, neither in quality or design, or by amenities provided - 10 va requimments. F..- Wever, since County stan'has agreed in concept to the percent density b --is, the City requests that, if the City's r.bjectio:,� is not considered and the bonus is granted, that the bonus provided be substantially equitable tcc the benefit received. Regarding project &sign, tit- 3nly thing unusual about these applications is the lack of on -site amenities This is a barely motheed grid pattern of development. it tacks the cure linear design features of the original concept pig -, Tract interiors have no special amenity features. For your conveniette.,fz, a comparison of the original concept pian to the present plan, Ous a third concept suggested by City staff is ate.: °hed. City standards would require a redesign of these mar - j r I I � r GN I ,. Ms. Gretchen Sangl- Charlton COUNTY OF SAN B ERNARDINC UCP 726.1 Page 9 421/90 g Please not^ al.e internal pedestrian paseos and pedestrian paseas connecting to open space and to arterial and collector streets. At a minimum, the latt.sr amenity should be added to the tract design. (See a,ta,ched;,and Use Study and Street Pattern Study Prepared for the City's Planning Dic Ision by RIM Design Group.) The project does ;provide 675 acres of open space and al acres of parks which is substantially in excess of avy similar amenity in the City. The City requIrerner•t for parks is 3 acres per 1,000 population. This project provides S acres per 1,000 population standard. The interior tract design is a balance cA'rvhat we perceive to be .`he City Planninfr Commission's desires In reference to lot sizes, grading standards and strrc� designs and has been developed from the iniVal site design. We would be happy to discuss additional open spaceipasPo connections. Several ppaseos have been added. The reservation of land for school and park use is presented hi tl.e preliminary plan of development, but is only rdnimally addressed on the MasterT entailve i IAVk 14492 by reference to "future school/park site ". °C..s y is no language or condition in the preliminary plan of development t _re this basic. amenity package. j fine applScan± is willing to be covditl"vd by the County on the l Prelim' Miry Development Plan for the provision of the scboolloark site. A 17 -acre park site is also discussed, but is even more rabulous, because it j exists on property that is owned oy Sowhem Californ ?a ;Edison and not the applicant. There are references to pn ; iG~ipmvements anc +to Lnprovements to casements adjacent to ,nark site in =_ipr to expand the efective area of the park sites. ztowev: ° :;sere am not conditioets w quantify the area, quantify the level of improC•stn onts, or M —zasure that park improvements are provided as a condition of granting a den .1y bonus. As :indicate,; earlier, Me SCE area has been deemed surplus and is bring aLgor.<ated for acquisition. Thib project will moat park standards vs estabifshed by the County for pa ;,k development. Virtually all tr al arms i es are located off site on easerpeaq. There is no 'tlt?,oe. in the plan or ;naps to ensure construction of these stets would be for the applicant to obtain letter of pem s Tprovements from SCE, MWD, and the SBCFCD. Nis. Gretclicn Seangl- Charlton COUNTY Or SAN BERNARDINO UCP 726.1 Page 10 821/90 Trails are shown in accordance to City master Plan of 9 rails, i fie applicant has met with SCE and Sro sad anticipates upprovsls for trails in,thr. ncxc two to three mi -atbs. SBCFC1i is r..at part of the UniversitylCresi project's tr ril propalais. Twenty-ti,.-Li acres of recn ation area are identified in The Preliminary P'�n of det a opment appti,��tion, however, oaiy 21.9 acres are nropowA for dedicated park puwpz,. . T! ere is no rnalysis of whe.e the six additional reereation acres will be provided: The currect propo. ^al is to providL for 21 acrea of improved park equivalent to {acres ofpar$ per 1,000 population. An eddit -anal- d acres ofimproved encumbered park land may be provided by the En Wanda North Specific Plau i:t the SCE corridor adiaeeat to the University. Area schooflpask site. Also, whil , this would provide park levels within this planned development greater than ttisee acres per thousand; it is unclear that the three acre per thousand standard ::1311 be met if the curqulative park requirement for the Etiwanda North area is considered. To,atake a determirztion : s to wrhother the gross park requirement for Etiwanda North is met requires an aWa ysis of the park requirements and provisions iz: the Etiwanda North Speci 1c Flan which is just begiinstir$ the County review process. This project' has Ptak standards that satisfy and exceed City requirements. It also will be consistent with the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. "he SCE surplus p ropetty is available only as a 55 -acre package. The entire 55 acres cht,uld he considered as part of the ammities pacUge gaalifying this project fcs a density bonus it is possible that other amenities such as donation ofa school site, should also be considered. This project provides pares in erccss of CitV rc.gttlremenes, proviides o 675 a .,rc opeea spr -s preserve, sad provisions fora schcLYl site, af of which at` . ,� ' this project for s density. bonus. Landscape amenities which are prov'.ded are ro greater than would be required of any other plan ofdevelopnenG. Landscaue amenities are designed to be a balance bcM,, :en City planniti and City eagiacering. The entry Monuments and t landscap.: provisions are upgraded significantly from tvpiral tracts. t Ms. Gretchen Stangl- Charlton COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO UCP 726.1 Page 11 8/21/90 Therms have been oral .cferznces to preservation ofthe 675 acre pared within the national forest as justification of the density bonus. However, the university is, in effect, exchanging 165 acres rat' developable land, which does not meet " University Reserve System criteria, on which they are paying no,',*xcsF arts which has s;ibstantiallyappreciated in valuesince acquisition to 19/7 for 675 acres of non- developable lard which meets the University Reserve criteria; f therefore, there is intrinsic value in the trade for tie University. I It should be noted that the density calculations should be revised to reflect the more accurate acreage calculations on the Tentative Tract maps. In the PDP, density appears to have been inadv.rtently assigned to the park and school site. According to Pat McGuckan, County Development Code Section, park and school sites, as well as commercial sites, must be subtracted . rio . o calculati ng' g dei-isity for a Plan. d Devel op mrnt application. We believe the City is incorrect. It is our understanding from the Coucty Staff that there are alternate ways of calculating density for these areas. TSis was confirmed by folio "JcMaens at the August 9, 1490 County DRC In the PDP the applicant is requesting a total of 119 bonus units plus 19 naits for transfer for a co. tined rte of 1,293 units. City calculation, based on the mote accu ate tract map acreage information, indicates a base density of only 1,142 units which would yield 114 Bonus units plus 17 units maximum for transfer from tht open space parcel for a combined total of 1,273 units. (See attached. Density i',nalysis Tables.) The County is encouraged to review the density calculations. After review:u- the current engineer acreage calculations, our dwelling unit t ;,tal is slightly under the maximum ,,srmitted. The back up infor -Plion is available for your review: Whether or iot the densities are revised, the County is also encouraged to give further eons : aeration to the equity of the value received from the propose? amenities package in return foc granting a density bonus. If a der-sity bonus is granted, it is rernrssted that the amenities package be firmly tied to i.le County approval prod, ana also that a stronger amenities package be required of the applicant. -if nothing else, this project is prepared to pay to t,5• County - requirements for parks and open space two and a half tiates the City's requirements for system -wide improvements or approximately -6.5 million dollarv. jlti Ms. Gretchen Stangi- Chariton I COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO UCP 726.1 Page 12 a/21/90 Inadcauate Justification forTransferrigp sity from the Cruet Subarea to the '. University Subarea City policy desires that density decrease from south to north. That policy is not achieved by these maps, County policy requires clustering to preserve Wert space, such as preservation/enhancemant of the two blue line streams that run through the site. Open space is not being preserved on site. Therefore, no benefit to the County or to the City is occurring by transferring units from the Crest tract to the Univerity tracts. We believe we meet the City's policyof decreasing density from south to north. There are no correctly identified blue line streams within the project area as determined by drainage data, The 675 acres open space being ,p p g presej-ved is a p ; t tf the site. We would suggest € ity staff conf?rm with the City Planning Commission regarding the benclits of our design philosophy of wccreasing density in the north and incr-asing density in the south. On the other hand, liabilities are occurring by concentradrg densities on the +j i University tracts beyond their capacity to receive density; Also, liabilities are occurring by concentrating density on the Univcrs;.ty tract in comparison with densities allowed on adjoining property. The future Route 30 Freeway will Ash provide a natural barrier of the Victoria Planned Community to the south and- Day Creek Channel and the Day Creek Wash provide natural barriers to the Caryn Planned Community to the west. There is no barrier to property in the Etiwanda S;kcific Plan to the east which is designated Very Low Density Residential Use, less than two dwelling units per acrd". Titus, the concentration � of density ua the University tracts introduces a higher intensity land use late an area planned by the County for up to three :units per acre and by the City for a Low and Very Low Intensity Land Us, of l`rss &,,in two to three dwelling units per acre. This increase in intensity, in turn, crcates a pressure to increase tl�.. intensity of use on adjoining parcets of land. Density proposed in the south end of The site reflects the Couety General Plan and we believe that with a Flood control channel and similar density to the west, the highway and more 1,- *cnse rases to the south, and less inte"c uses to the c8J i across the 300' wide SCE corridor . the densities proposed from a land use perspective arc justified. 11. INADEQUACY OF THE COiV1M RMA t cYf�: The size and location bf the propcsed commeicial site is not adequate according to City guidelines for commercial development. A better location would be adjacent to the northwest comer of the intersection of the Route 30 Fremmy an& lay Creek Boulevard. This location would lave more visible access and provide d buffer to tesidtntial development to the north. (See attached land Use Study, July, 1990.) f K -s�G Ms, Grctchcrr Stan gt- Chariton COUNrfY OF SAN BERNARDINO UCP 726.1 Page 13 8/21/90 A commercial site at the koute 30 Freerzey and Day Creek 4 DoWcVard does not work because arthe necessary geomxtry ��f the cite and aceyss problems- The site location at Eanyva Avertrte was chosen to impart a greater sense of community hub watt its neighborhood park and elementary, school Experience ras shown that approximately 15 acres is optimal for a neighborhood commercial center. Therefcfe, City staff would support a larger commercial site and oppose a site less tha=t 10 nct acres for commercial { development. Further, the Preliminary Plan of Development List of Potential Uses include s drive -in theater. The aforementioned use would not be appropriate and should be deleted from the list of potential rises. We would be willing to increase the commesaial site ac.-?age but our market research indicates that the would do so at the detriment OF the pfaposed Edwanda Community C-liter healed at Wilson nd East Avenues. The drive-in theater has been deleted as a permitted use. Design criteria for the commercial site should be included in the preliminary and/or final plan oe development Design criteria should be consistent with the design for the surrounding residential development and Wx :h the neighborhood design therre. in the Etiwanda North Specific Pion. The County requires this commercial site to Y rocesx independeatly at a laterdeate undera conditional use permit. 12. ENVIIaONMEPULALISS_IIES 'I Seismic Studies Inadequate: The City of Rancho Cucamonga has�ldentified the Red Dill Fault Seisadc Study Zone, The 3113P places a school r nd a park site within th , adjacent tq th;� fault zone, but v caching studies wets ;invited to a 1L-it approximating the alignment of Day Creek Boulevard., Add;ilonal trenching should be required prior to the approval ofaryplan. We .have and will continue to saiisfy all seismir: study requirements. Traffic Studies Tn _dt-agatg. The draft Final ETR references_oniv %unzrnan Associates tra fic studies. Stssbsequent studies have been provided ty DKS and Austin Faust Associates which should be referenced in the Elk. The City recognizes the Austin Faust trai':ic mitigatir t measures as adequate to addrsss City traffic impacts, The Austin Faust mitj; motion measure should be dreulated to Caltra:W for comment on the adequacy of the regional mitigation measures. Ms Gretchen Stang[ - Charlton COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDWO UCP 726.1 Page 14 821/90 The results Bons the City traffic model r >'ch closely W t'h ihosc 4 j previously proposed by the appiicaat and srpreaetst a commitrnc,al two and a half dimes graatcr than thO 'City currently requires of any devclopme"t. Resource Management Pian Not Provided: Two USGS blue line str%ams will b., closed according to the proposed plans of development for tic subject applications. Mitigation measures will be required br;'+e California Dcnartrumt of Fish and Game and the US. Fish and Wildlife Service but have net been addressed. • A resource Mauapement Plan is diligently underway as part of the Eil and; North SpccflAIrc Plan and th* CRY, is invited to paxticipate. As previously stated, Finis "blue -fide strew as" were incorrectly identified according -to cutretat tfrainage data. Enviroamen.aa Impact d.aport analysis has concludckk that the 673' I acres open spa: a is adequatemitigatioa. Mite tion A tto n , g �i► tom' n � Piett No: Provided: 7'1 a miVSation measures in the EYR should ire re riewed fa. sscuracy..by alt responsible agencies and a mitigation menitoting plan be prepared in order to estublisb the adequacy of impltoracatation of the, mitigation measures prior to approval of the subject plans and maps. A mitigation monitoring P., °an has yens t~oarpreteei' � part of the EIR. Since dedication of the 67S acre open space is accepted mitiPti®u, enforcement of the mitigation will 6r, easy. Cumulative imnacts Fnadeuaat d r�ssed: The subject pi ans and maps are } included in an application to the County for a .Specific PIan proposing 2,173 dwelling units. Additionally, as ;application for a 624 unit residential development and golf course has been filed in the Countyc; &* is immediately north of the site of these applications. Also, the Rock Crusher site is immediately wes$ of the site of these applications.: There will be sigr_ifcant - cumulative impacts associated with these and other applications which must be adequately addressed prior to approval of atis;pmject. The items referenced by the City are pant of the Etimwda North Specific Plan rt: other c,;tuaty development plans and are io be addressed as part of th,2t Specific Plan. 'CoaJitioas attached to this application are believed to 3;e consistent Specific with the Plan and a condition may be attached that requires compliance with other conditions developed feom the review of the S,pecildc Plan. Ms. C,rctchcn Stangl- Charlton COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO UCP 726.1 Amok Page 15 8/21/90 ti Fnvin;nmgntai Impact ReoorAdde gffa1 aVA ble f�rl~<cview; The has requested (lat an EIR addendum be prepared for the subject applications. As of this date, tt,k addendum is not complate and has. not been circulated for review. The addendum is near completion and focuses primarily on traffic issues which are addressee) elsewhere. Failure to Circulate EIR Addendum for Commeirt Rssponsibla agencies, including but not limited to the City, Caittans, and California Department of ' Fish and Game, and U.S. Department Fish and Wildlife Service should have'an opportunity to comment on the adequacy of the V.IR in the context of the cumulative impacts of the project When the addendum is available for review, the City requests recirculation of the final draft EIR, together with the addendum to all responsible agencies for comment prior to approval for the subject applications. i This project conforms to requirements m CEQA" and all other applicable rules and regulo ons for preparation vkf an EIR. 13. APPROVAL IS PPPMATURF: Approval of the University /Crest plans and maps at this time is putting the =q before the horse in relation to the Etifvanda Norris Specific Plan. The applicat o for the University /Crest proposals are also applicants for the Specific Flare submitted to the County in iuly, 119o, The University/Crest proposal is included in the Specific Plan. Tie Specific Plan includes design criteria; backbone infrastructure plates, and outer components necessary for the orderly development of this open and undeveloped area. The rIIt for the'Spezific Plan will address the cumulative impacts nfdevelopment which otherwise trust be addressed piecemeal. It is unlikel y m that development P of the University /Crest prokrtycan oc^ttr until the issuer, raised in the Specific j Plan are resolved including the need for a financial pnekage to proAde the required "backbone infrastructure. Therefore, agprowA of the Univerrity /Crest tract should be postponed until the Specific plan is approved. As planners we would suggest that the tot :!,rearming area rr. tiaris from ll Mikea Avenue at Highland to the costetn City limit. The City has been approving devela meats a PF 8' p g That area without an Y caranech ®n to a specify: play while this zppbitration is for an approval that relates t9 8_ si c6fic plan. " The City sbould be i0timatelyfac2iliar with ►hc Etuxaada North Specific Pisa and we remeie willing to address any sgeeilsc questions the City may have_ Ms. Gretchen 5tangt•Chariton: COUNTY Or , AN BERNATZD- WO UCh 726.1 Page 16 &2t/90 SUMMARY AND 1t�N`i: Based on the 13, major it, sues discussed above, City staff would have rce,,:immended 810stantial redesign or dei'iai of the University/Crest rroposals if these applications had been review(-,d by the City. Because it appears as though only miner revisions are being'rcquested by County staff, ano the site is in the City's Sphere of Influence, City staff has prepared i ecommendations and conditions, [ am . requesting that they be incorporated -Inta the Counly list of conditions. The City lists include conditions prepared by Planning, Engineerittg, and the Fire District which have been forwarded under separate cover, as well as the attached list of additional conditions which reflect the issues discuss�`d in this letter. The applicant would tike i , work closely with the City and the County to dev lop the finest ! residential community in the Inland Empire, respecting private property rights and the community good. Very m tyyours, s IiarTis Principal M.,pr Corr 17 ew Brad Build, City of Rancho Cucamonga " Pete Darigermond Dang6rmon4 rfc Associates :r i ;c>�gust 28, 1990 COUNTY REFERRAL - UNIVERSITY /CREST PROJECT ., CITY STAF=F COMMENTS ON APPLICANTS LETTER OF AUGUST 21, 1990 The fo.11,..ing are City staff comments on the applicant's letter to the County dated August 21, IP90: City concerns were sent to the County on August 6, 1990, an the occasion of the County Deve,',opment Review Committee meeting on the University /Crest project. County staff said they would respord to our concerns, but no response has been received as of this date. In most i ^stances, the applicant has commented on but not mitigated to City concerns and requests: 1. INADEQUATE TIME FOR REVIEW: As of this date, the addendum to the EIR is not available for review. The applicant has until August 31, 1990 to comply with the Ccuflty requests for revision of maps and plans.. The County staff report to the Planning Commission hearing on September 13, 1990 will be circulated on September 7, 1990. Cite, staff will hatre approximately one day to prepare a response for the County Planni.ig, Commission haring. 'ihis is not an adequate review period. 2. INCONSISTENCIES AMONG THE PRE!IMINARY PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT, ETC.: Property Limits. County staff ltas requested map corrections which are due Friday, AucgCwt 31, 1990. School and Park Site. County staff has requested a letter from the School District accepting the site will be required. Format. County staff has requested revisions which will _ provide increased consistency. i Off -site Construction. County staff has requested resolution of these discrepancies and given the applicant until August 31, 1990 to resolve. 3. LACK OF INFORMATION ABOUT RELATIONSHIP TO ADJOININ PROPERTIES: Southern California Edison and Metropolitan Water District. County staff will require letters from Southern Gilifornia Edison and Metropolitan Water District cla ifying use of off -site property and given the applicant until August 31, 1990 to resolve. COUNTY REFERRAL UNIVERSITY /CREST PROOECT page p Recional Trails. County staff will require letters from i Southern California Edison agreeing in concept to use of easemehts for: trails. Adjoining Parcels, County staff has requested that � q access to adjoinutg parcels be af,own on the maps and given the applicant until August 31, 1990 to resolve. Rock Crusher 'easEhold. The Austin -Faust Traffic Study will provi3e a basis to determ nA the need for road uxtensions. So�ithern Californ;a Edison Surplus Property. County staff has requested that the status of this purchase be clarified and given the applicant until August 31, 1990 to respond. Property, to the East of the University Site. County staff has requested that Hanley Avenue be extended to provide access for property to the east and given the applicant until August 31, 1990 to revise the maps. 1. FAILURE 0 MEET CT7Y PLANVAG STANDARDS: City 6eneral Plan Amendment for University Pro2erty. To achieve planning consistency, the City has requested that a City General Plan Amendment be filed by the University_ This. request was first made when the development application was submitted to the County i!i :pD=, Conformity with hillside bw. _oament Urdinance. To begin the review process, - ,,rye Hillside Development Ordinance requires a slope analysis map based on a rrtaximum contour interval of 2 feet for slopes up to 20 %. No such maps have been referred to the City from the County. Specific Plan Development Standards. The City Development Code permit*, standards to be tailored within a City Specific Plan. Since there is no approved - Specific Plan for the subject appT %ation, City staff is reviewi:g the application ns c standard Tract Map appl`- dtion. S. PAtWRE TO MaT CITY ENGINEERING STANDARDS: County staff has taken the position that County standards apply unless the applicant volunteers to conform to ° City standards. 6. FAILURE TO MEET CITY BUILDING AND SAFETY STANDARDS: Copy'has been forwarded to the applicant. 7. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT STANDARDS., The applicant stages that they will comply wit') Fire District requirements. City staff will mon'tor County conditions for adequacy. !i COUNTY REFERRAL - UNIMISITY %CREST PROJECT Page 3 8. INADEQUATE DESIGN CRITERIA. The applicant has stated that t'caa Specific Plan will conform to this application. This is cart- before -the -horse planning. the Specific Plan :should be approved first. x 9. INCONSISTENT WITH CITY GENERAL PLAN: City General Plan Status. See item 4 above. University Tax Status. If the University does not seek a City General P13n amendment, the tax exempt status cif the University property since acquisition in 1977 sh)uld be researched further. General Plan Circulation Pian inconsistencies. County and City staff are working toward resolution of �2 differences in the tt +o circulation plans. City st;tf will evaluate map revisions when they are available. 1G. DENSITY ISSUES: City standards. See item 4 discussion. Dpnsity transfer from 675 acre site. Even though the site probably does not technically '*et the County requirements for density transfer. City staff supports the concept of the density transfer if in fact the 675 acres are permanently preserved as open space. Density bonus. City staff has not found a provision in the County Development Code permitting double counting of the 675 acre site for a density transfer, and also, as justification for a density bonus. Om -site park sites. State law requires contribution of a developed park site or equivalent in -lieu fees for a minimum of th^ee acres per thousand. In the City of Rancho 'Cucamonga and throughout the West Valley area, _ the granting of tract approvals increases the land value far beyond the ability of acquisition through funds generated by any fee schedule collected on a building permit basis. Therefore, except for in -fill projects, City policy requires contribution of developed park sites as part of the approval process. In the past, the County has approved the collection of in -lieu fees for parks. As tracts are approved in the County, the laek of parks and the inability of public agencies to acquire parks in the sphere area is increased, whether annexation occurs or not. This is an increasingly serious problem which must be resolved. Off -site park sites. Promises to provide pt�ks -are not _ contractual. COUNTY REFERRAL - UNIVERSITY /CREST PROJECT Page 4 Off - --ite trails. County staff is revie. ping Ci6y requests for conditions for trails and parks. Landscaped easements. Since the landscaped eastnpients are included on the applicant's Final Development 'Plan, ` the responsibility is the applicant's and should then °fore be canditioned aN,tcordingly. Larviscape amenities. Ther, is lack of a basis to review ther applicant's statLnent. County Development Code. City staf'r will research whether any other recent County nrQ ects have been allowed to transfer density from sctTiol and park z tes. Oersity bonus value. Transportation fees Meet the applicant's minimum requirement for environmental impaut mitigation for circulation and shall not be counted toward density bonus value. The minimum legal requirement for parks for this project is 13.56 acres of developed par;— cost shall not be counted toward a density bsnus. Density transfer from Crest to University site. the applicant has not provided adequate justification for the transfer, nor demonstrated the: the receiving area is able to absorb t'? additional Blue Line Streams. By law, State and Federal wtildlife agenci,ts must make the dete,,mination about blue line stream mitigation. Compatible Land Uses. An analysis of Adjoining land uses to the University property indicatee Vhat adjoining_ projects have been approved at gross .xn5ity of three urWs per ;acre or less. Immediately to 'the west, the Blackmon tract was approved at 3.12 up-its per ✓moss acre. Immediately to the east, the PuisarjWatt tracts _ were approved for 2.03 units to the gross acre. 11. IN.:aEQUACY OF THE COMMERCIAL SITE: City staff suggests that the County equire the applicant to fund a County contract for s Aarket study to .`etermine the optimum size and locati for the pr:,posud `commercial site. Desinn Lr,}teria for the Cemmercial Centecr Criteria should be included in the i ?rel`,Inary Develop-lent Plan. For example, development st7.rtdards listed to not require a landscape buffer between thn, commercial site and the residences. i El COUNTY REFERRAL - UNIVERSITY /CREST PROJECT Page 5 12. E' IRONMENTAL ICSt1E5. Seismic Studies.` The applicant's geologist has stated that the City`s Red Hill Study Zone'does not need to be addressed because processing is occurring in the County. Traffic Study. County staff has given the applicant until August 31, 1990 to revise the existing study and will make a det— - nation on adequacy at that time. Resource Management Plan. This is another' example of cart- before - the - *urse pl *nning. Until there is an approved Resaarce Management PliAn, it will be difficult, or impon5ible, for 'State and '�ederal wildlife agencies to assess mitigation requirements for this project which is located entirely on sensitive Alluvial Fan Scrub habitat. Miti ation Monitoring Plan. No Mitigation Monitoring Plan has been received by City staff. ilhen it is received, it is anticipated that the Litigation Monitoring Plan will address a1Z the impacts identified in the 1IR as required by State law. Cumulative Impacts. This is one more example of r`:rt before -tlie -horse planning. This plan cannot legally be conditioned to conform to a Specific Plan which has not been approved. EIR Addendum. Cr -inty staff is still ,revising the EIR addendum and has trot i leased a copy rb. review. CEL►A Conformance. Cjtu; sta F will meet with the City Attorney to review W .ner this project does conform to CEQA. 13. APPROVAL IS PREMATURE: City staff and City Plavning Commission rcyiew of a proposed Specific Plan and preparation of an EIR have identified concerns which mst be addressed before rational development ,.an occur in the Sphere area. Until all the conce,,;s which have been raised, and all the impacts which have been identified, can be addressed,_de.elopment in the Sphere area will be premature and no further, 3pta7gmis should occur. tt G _ 0 0701 -02 009- -12 -90 .Agenda o 5 of-5 The Canyn Company Pod Office Box 9216.80. Lqfms, CA 92677-0216 Offfoe (714) 499 -5929 PAX (714) 499 -$173 L September 5, 1990 Mayor Dennis Stout City Council Members City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 Re: University Crest PD Dear Mayor & Members of the City Council: Quoting from and responding to the latest Staff Report of September 5: 94A S1 cific Plan must be approved prior to individual project approvals.° This statement is not true. State law allows the procedures we are following. in asimilar manner, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has already annexed and/or approved four tracts that are part of the original•Etiwanda North planning area. Since the PD and the Etiwanda North Specific Plan (ENSP) have been under intensive study for more Than two years, the County, City and landowners si1ould all know how everything will tie together by row. The studies that Staff lists in its report are partial evidence of the commitment that we, the University of California, Betty McNay, The Caryn Company (Car;,,) and the rest of the land- owners consortium have made to have Etiwanda North the most i�orotZhly studied, environ- mentally sound, fiscally responsible residential development done to date in the County or the City. We continue to invite the City to discuss differing viewpoints. However, to pro- tect our rights, we need to have an appropriate forum in which to state our viewpoints. Under current circumstances, the County appears to be the proper forum. "The density is too high.R Staff overstates the overall density of the University Crest PD by 25 to 30 percent (net or gross), Density is not 3.83 dwelling units per acre but rather about three dwelling units per acre. vVe commit that no individual tracts will exceed four homes to the acre and all tracts will meet the minimum 7,209 square foot lol size specified in the City's nLf1 (2 - 4 dwelling units per acre) density category as requested by Staff and the Planning Commission. As pointed out by Mayor Stout in the City /C-ounty /Consortium meeting of May 22, a PD sets it's own staridards..The University Crest PD sets 1418 own standards in that it transfers densities from the north end of the property to the south to better respect site specific conditions. With or without the transfer of density, the PD proposes no more homes than implied by the City's General Plan or specifically allowed by the County's. The Staff states that "the City has never supported the County's ,concept of a density bonus'1 and, therefore, never should. I believe this opinion is not in the besc interests of the perple of Rancho Cucamonga. I believe, as do others, that it is in the best interest of the people to keep the beautiful Upper Day Canyon preserved as open space rather than developed into a number of large, gated, private estates, as would happen were it not for Betty McMay's .--- ._.,G. 7-c- r�7 Mayor Dennis Stout City Council Members University Crest PD September 5, 1990 Page Two 11 year effort to protect the property. The City and its residents are alos receiving a benefit that can be measured in dollars. Betty, one of the official Founders of the City, and a resident of 38 years, is the major owner of the 675 acres. Eve- subtracting the value of the density transfer and bonus, she is giving away perhaps three million dollars in land value by volunteering to keep that property one of the most beautiful in all this valley as protected open space. It may hQ generally appropriate for the Staff to concentrate on planning issues and not financial issues, but in this case, the financial benefit is so great it should mkot be ignored or belittled. As Larry McNeil, Chairman of the Planning Commission acknowledged, we believe that part of the benefits of this Plan are indeed financial, as well as environments; Indeed, in addition to the open space and public improvements, our Financial impact Rer Vt ins �cates Etiwanda North would generate over $1,000,000 yearly after paying for all of its services. "Design criteria is inadexArate.° Perhaps Staff means to say the design criteria is uncodified rather than inadequate. This PD follows design criteria which, quoting Staff, was "developed by the consortium of Etiwanda North landowners, incorporated into the draft ENSP, and reviewed in several Planning Com- mission workshops ". These standards become codified for this property when the PD is approved. To insure the success of these unign i standarAs developed with so much effort, we ask that the City respect the standards above Lighland avenue, especially for major road and parkway designs. In turn, respecting the Planning Commission's comments in their meeting of August 22, we will, when and where appropriate, add paseos and increase street curves. When appropriate studies justify the change, we will make application to increase the size of the neighborhood hub commercial center. As far as we Mow, the Tentative Maps we attempted to submit to the City in March meet the standards of the City's latest hillside grading ordinance. "Environmental review is inadequate" Staff is correct in that the EIR for this project was initiated prior to the ENSP's EIR. Indeed, the PD EIR helped formulate the larger Specific Plan EIR. The ENSP EIR has been a two year effort bv `-ie consortium and Staff, and we both should be aware of the cumulative impacts since V . ENSP EIR seemed ready for circulation this past spring. I believe the cumulative impact . rtre addressed consistently ar.3 comprehensively in both EIRs. If the Etiwanda North EIR in it. final form significantly modifies some of the mitigation measures specified in the University Crest's PD EIR, those modifications may be incorporated. The traffic issues and precedent setting mitigations incorporated into the PD's EIR reflects over two years of traffic studies by both our consultants and the City's consultants. The result, I believe, can be a harmonious strategy that should set standards for the rest of the City.. The PD and Specific Plan are the only areas in the City or it's sphere that volunteer to meet the standards set by the City's new traffic model, at a cost nearly three times greater than the City now charges other development. Similarly, the PD and Specific Plan park standard of five to seven acres of park per 1,000 people exceeds the City's requirement of three acres and its unenforced standard of five acres. Schools and fire protection services in the PD and Specifie Plan also exceed the requirements generally imposed elsewhere in the City. Contrary to Staff's report implication, the PD's EIR was circulated to all appropriate State and Federal agencies as required b., 'taw. We slso disagree with the implication that the Mayor Dennis Stout City Council Members University Crest PD Septem'.ier 5, 1990 Page Three University property on Highland Av €nue is a sensitive natural habitat. A Resource Manage- ment Plwl is under preparation but it's indeed putting the cart before the horse to maintain that the Resource Management Plan should be approved prior to -'np EIR when the Resource Management Plan is to be an implementation devise for the findings established by the EIR. The 675 acres is an integral part of the Resource Management Plan, and as a major resource, it's management is addressed in the PD EIR. "Summnry and Conclusions The ENSP has been through several community and Planning Commission workshops over the last two years. The $Uwanda community seemed satisfied with the proposed quality of development. The planning effort in Etiwanda North to date has cost nearly two million dollars. I believe the City sho�dd reconsider starting that ;planning process all over again at the tax payers expense, or moving on an annexation that can happen only if the voters in Etiwanda North voluntarily elect to annex. I recwmmend we remember Mayor Stout's comment that standards in the County and the City can be "different" although not necessarily "higher" or "lower". Then I recommend we work cooperatively in a manner acceptable to both City Council and the County to insure the highest possible level of community amenities and infrastructure in a legally and fiscally responsible manner for all residents north or south of the City /County line. I look forward to future meetings with City Council representatives to discuss ways of insuring proper cots dination and review. Thank you for yovi time. Sincerely, Joseph N. Dilorio President JND /jas cc: Mr. Jack Lam Mr. Rick Gomez Mr. Brad Buller Mr. Roger Samuelsen, University of California Mr. Gordon Schanck, University of California Mr. Pete Dangermond CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT 1 DATE: September 12, 1990 g TO: Chairman end Members of the Planning Commissior, FROM: Brad Busier, City Planner BY: Gail Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS I.. BACKGROUND Traditionally the Planning Commission has .reviewed membership for rotation approximately every six months, Design Review Committee appointments were last reviewed on February 28, 1990, Following is a listing of Committee members since February 1989: COMMERCIAL. /INDUSTRIAL RESIDENTIAL February_ 1989 - June 1989: Suzanne Chitiea Larry McNiei Peter Tolstoy Bruce Emerick Alternate: David Blakesley June 1989- February 1990: Suzanne Chitiea Larry McNiel Peter Tolstoy David Blakesley Alternate: Betsy Weinberger February 1990 - present: Suzanne Chitiea Larry McMiei Peter Tolstoy Betsy Weinberger Alternate: John Melcher II. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning; Commission should determine apprepriate membership of the Design Review Committees. Re f y S d, Bra Bul City nner BB:gs ITFM L