HomeMy WebLinkAbout14-102 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 14-102
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
RESOLUTION NO. 07-160, REVISING CITY-WIDE
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT FEES FOR ALL
DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF
A. RECITALS
1. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City Council") adopted Ordinance
No. 445 in April, 1991 creating and establishing the authority for imposing and charging
city-wide transportation development fees.
2. The City Council has previously adopted Resolution No. 07-160, establishing city-wide
transportation fees as authorized by Ordinance No. 445.
3. The City's Engineering Services Department is responsible for reviewing the continued
need for the described capital improvements, and revising the cost estimates and fees
when appropriate.
4. On June 4, 2014, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly
noticed public hearing concerning the fee revision adopted herein.
5. The revised cost estimates and fee calculations applicable to the fee revision herein
were presented to a the City Council at an open and public meeting on May 7, 2014,
at which members of the public were able to present written and oral comments
regarding the revised fees, and the report regarding the revised fees was available for
public inspection and review ten (10)days prior to that public meeting. The fee revision
adopted herein is based on that report, which is incorporated herein by this reference.
6. It is a requirement of the Development Mitigation Program approved by the San
Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency (CMA) that project costs and
fees, including transportation development fees, be updated annually.
7. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. RESOLUTION
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds, declares, and resolves
as follows:
1. The facts set forth in the Recitals, above, are true and correct.
2. The City Council hereby further finds as follows:
The purpose of the fee revision herein is to finance transportation improvements
needed to mitigate the impacts of traffic generated by new development.
Resolution No. 14-102 - Page 1 of 12
The fees collected pursuant to this Resolution shall be used to finance only the
public facilities described or identified in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference.
The construction of the described or identified public facilities is consistent with the
Circulation Element of the City's General Plan.
There is a reasonable relationship between the need for the described or identified
public facilities, and the mitigation of traffic impacts associated with new
development.
There is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee shown in Exhibit
"B," attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, and the type of
development for which the fee is charged.
The cost estimates set forth in Exhibit "A" are reasonable cost estimates for
constructing these facilities, and the transportation development fees expected
to be generated by new development will not exceed the total of these costs.
3. The following defined terms shall have the meaning set forth in this numbered
paragraph:
a. "Development projects" shall mean construction of residential, commercial,
industrial, office, or other non-residential improvements, or the addition of floor
space to existing improvements. A"development project" includes any project
involving the issuance of a building permit for construction or reconstruction.
"Exempted development" shall mean a floor space addition to an existing
residential building, and the following types of uses: public schools, colleges,
libraries, churches, parks, county jail, or sports complex.
"Equivalent dwelling unit" or "EDU", is used to convert all types of land uses into
an equivalent unit that enables Nexus fees to be tabulated as dollars per EDU.
One residential single family detached housing unit is equal to one EDU.
4. Payment of Fee: The revised Transportation Development Fee shall be paid prior to
issuance of any building permit or issuance of a certificate of occupancy, whichever
occurs first; unless otherwise pre-empted by State regulations. The City Engineer
shall determine the amount of the fee based upon the size and type of development.
5. Fee Schedule: The amount of the revised Transportation Development Fee was
determined to be $9,002 per EDU. The calculations used to make this determination
are shown in the attached Exhibit "C, which is hereby incorporated in full by this
reference.
6. EDU / Land Use Equivalent Schedule: The calculation of EDU for each land use is
based on the trip generation rates shown in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 5th
Edition. The EDU for each identified land use type is as follows:
Resolution No. 14-102 - Page 2 of 12
Land Use Type EDU
Residential — Single Family Detached Unit 1.0 EDU
Residential — Multiple Family Attached Unit 0.6 EDU
Apartment or Condominium —Attached Unit 0.6 EDU
Senior Housing Attached (Condo or Apartment)— 0.2 EDU
Per Bedroom
Nursing /Congregate Care — Per Bed 0.2 EDU
Commercial — Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.5 EDU
Office / Business Park—Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.2 EDU
Industrial — Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.6 EDU
Warehouse— Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.5 EDU
Hotel / Motel — Per Room 0.8 EDU
Day Care — Per Student 0.25 EDU
Self-Storage— Per Unit 0.02 EDU
Service Station — Per Pump 5.0 EDU
7. Use of Fee: The Transportation Development Fee shall be solely used to pay for the
public facilities described in Exhibit "A", or for reimbursing the City for development's
fair share of those capital improvements already constructed by the City, or to
reimburse other developers who have constructed public facilities described in Exhibit
„A„
8. Administration Fee: The City shall include an Administration Fee in the amount of 15%
of the total project cost for the management of the Transportation Fee Program.
9. Fee Review: The Engineering Services Department shall review the estimated cost
of the described capital improvements, the continued need for these improvements,
and the reasonable relationship between such need and the traffic impacts of the
various types of development pending or anticipated and for which the fee is charged.
The City Engineer shall report the findings to the City Council at a noticed public
hearing, and recommend any adjustment to this fee or other action as may be needed.
10. Effective Date: This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption, provided that the fees
as herein adopted, described, and amended shall not be collected by the City until
September 1, 2014.
11. Judicial Action to Challenge This Resolution: Any judicial action proceeding to attack,
review, set aside, void, or annul this resolution shall be brought within 120 days of its
adoption.
12. Certification: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
Resolution No. 14-102 - Page 3 of 12
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 4"day of June 2014.
AYES: Michael, Spagnolo, Steinorth, Williams
NOES: Alexander
ABSENT: None
ABSTAINED: None
l- ennis Michael, Mayoi
ATTEST:
MI"L l!/J
nice C. Reynolds, City Jerk
I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and
adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting
of said City Council held on the 4"' day of June 2014.
Executed this 5'" day of June 2014, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
QZW
6 �
J nk a C. Reynolds, City CkYrk
Resolution No. 14-102 - Page 4 of 12
RESOLUTION NO. 14-102
EXHIBIT "A"
TRANSPORTATION FEE PROGRAM
PROJECTS & PROJECT COSTS
Freeway Interchanges
Project Estimate
F1 Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway -Widen NB & SB On-Ramps $340,000
F2 Foothill Boulevard at 1-15 Freeway - Widen NB & SB On-Ramps $1,105,000
F3 Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway - Interchange Improvements $20,500,000
F4 Arrow Route at 1-15 Freeway - Interchange $41,100,000
F5 Grove Avenue /4th Street at 1-10 Freeway - Interchange Improvements $4,500,000
Total: $67,545,000
Railroad Grade Separations and Crossings
Project Estimate
ER3
Haven Avenue at Metrolink Crossing - Grade Separation $10,840,000
6th Street W/O Lucas Ranch Road - Improve RXR Crossing Gates $880,000
6th Street E/O Santa Anita Avenue - Install new RXR Crossing Gates $880,000
Hellman Avenue at 8th Street - Upgrade Existing RXR Crossing Gates $880,000
Total: $13,480,000
Bridges
Project Estimate
B1 6th Street at Cucamonga Creek Channel -Widen Existing Bridge $2,050,000
82 9th Street at Cucamonga Creek Channel -Widen Existing Bridge $972,000
B3 Arrow Route at Etiwanda Ditch -Widen Existing Bridge $954,000
B4 Banyan Street at Etiwanda Creek Channel - Bridge $1,086,000
B5 Hellman Avenue at Cucamonga Creek Channel -Widen Existing Bridge $6,203,000
B6 Whitram Avenue at Etiwanda Ditch - Bridge $1,196,000
B7 Wilson Avenue at Day Creek Channel - Bridge $1,231,000
BB Wilson Avenue at Etiwanda Creek Channel - Bridge $2,073,000
Total: $15,765,000
Resolution No. 14-102 - Page 5 of 12
Streets
Project Estimate
S1 6th Street - Santa Anta Avenue to Etiwanda Avenue - Backbone $666,000
S2 Arrow Route - Grove Avenue to Baker Avenue -Widen 2 to 4 Lanes $1,347,000
S3 Arrow Route - 500' E/O 1-15 Fwy to 1,300' E/O 1-15 Fwy - Widen South $1,118,000
Side
S4 Banyan Street - Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue -Widen North Side $987,000
S5 Banyan Street- East Avenue to Wardman Bullock Road - New Alignment $8,139,000
S6 Base Line Road - Etiwanda Avenue to 1-15 Fwy- Widen North Side 2 to 3 $983,000
Lanes
S7 Cherry Avenue -Wilson Avenue to 1-15 Freeway -Widen West Side $1,191,000
S8 Church Street-Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue -Widen 2 to 4 Lanes $1,276,000
S9 East Avenue - 1-15 to Victoria Street -Various Bottlenecks $816,000
S10 East Avenue - Fire Station to Wilson - New $1,295,000
S11 East Avenue -Wilson Avenue to North Rim Way - New $438,000
S12 Etiwanda Avenue - 6th Street to Arrow Route -Widen 2 to 4 Lanes $4,125,000
S13 Etiwanda Avenue - Miller Avenue to 850' N/O Miller Avenue -Widen East $282,000
Side
S14 Etiwanda Avenue - Banyan St. to Wilson Ave. -Curb and Gutter East Side $929,000
ly
S15 Etiwanda Avenue - Existing Northern Terminus to North Rim Way- New $525,000
S16 Foothill Boulevard - Vineyard Avenue to Hellman Avenue - Widen 4 to 6 $1,204,000
Lanes
S17 Foothill Boulevard - Hellman Ave. to 700' E/O Hellman Ave. - Widen N/S $1,930,000
Only
S18 Foothill Boulevard at Archibald Avenue -Widen Intersection $7,245,000
S19 Foothill Boulevard -Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue - Widen 4 to 6 $1,959,000
Lanes
S20 Grove Avenue - 8th Street to Tapia Via - Widen 1 to 2 Lanes East Side $1,074,000
Only
S21 GGrolve Avenue- San Bernardino Rd to Foothill Blvd -Widen 1-2 Lanes E/S $661,000
S22 Haven Avenue-Base Line Road to 1-210 Freeway-Widen West Side Only $12,338,000
S23 Lower Crest Road - Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue - New $1,606,000
S24 Miller Avenue - Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue -Widen 2 to 4 Lanes $2,426,000
S25 Milliken Avenue-5th Street to 700' SIO 5th Street-Widen West Side Only $305,000
S26 Victoria Street — E. P.L. of Etiwanda H.S. to 1-15 Fwy - Improve Both $294,000
Shoulders
S27 Vintage Drive - Etiwanda Avenue to 1,300'W/O Etiwanda Avenue - New $860,000
S28 Wilson Avenue - Milliken Avenue to Day Creek Boulevard - New $6,824,000
S29 Wilson Avenue - Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue - Backbone Only $565,000
S30 Wilson Avenue - East Avenue to Wardman Bullock Road - New $6,000,000
S31 Youngs Canyon - Cherry Avenue to Wardman Bullock- New $9,400,000
Total: $78,808,000
Resolution No. 14-102 - Page 6 of 12
TrafFc Signals
Project Estimate
T1 4th Street at Richmond Place $350,000
T2 4th Street at Utica Avenue $350,000
T3 6th Street at Buffalo Avenue $350,000
T4 6th Street at Cleveland Avenue $350,000
T5 6th Street at Etiwanda Avenue $350,000
T6 6th Street at Hellman Avenue $350,000
T7 6th Street at Pittsburgh Avenue $350,000
T8 6th Street at Rochester Avenue $350,000
T9 6th Street at Santa Anita Avenue $350,000
T10 6th Street at Utica Avenue $350,000
T11 Archibald Avenue at Banyan Street $350,000
T12 Archibald Avenue at San Bernardino Road $350,000
T13 Archibald Avenue at Victoria Street $350,000
T14 Archibald Avenue at Wilson Avenue $350,000
T15 Arrow Route at Center Avenue $350,000
T16 Banyan Street at Rochester Avenue $350,000
T17 Banyan Street at Wardman Bullock Road $350,000
T18 Base Line Road at San Carmela Court $350,000
T19 Base Line Road at Shelby Place $350,000
T20 Carnelian Street at Banyan Street $350,000
T21 Carnelian Street at Wilson Avenue $350,000
T22 Cherry Avenue at Youngs Canyon Road $350,000
T23 Church Street at Elm Avenue $350,000
T24 Church Street at Mayten Avenue $350,000
T25 Church Street at Ramona Avenue $350,000
T26 Church Street at Terra Vista Parkway $350,000
T27 Civic Center Drive at Red Oak Street $350,000
T28 Ridgeline Place at Wilson Avenue $350,000
T29 Day Creek Boulevard at Madrigal Place $350,000
T30 Day Creek Boulevard at Wilson Avenue $350,000
T31 East Avenue at Miller Avenue $350,000
T32 East Avenue at Highland Avenue $350,000
T33 Etiwanda Avenue at Garcia Drive $350,000
T34 Etiwanda Avenue at Whittram Avenue $350,000
T35 Foothill Boulevard at Cornwall Court $350,000
T36 Foothill Boulevard at East Avenue $350,000
T37 Foothill Boulevard at Malachite Avenue $350,000
T38 Haven Avenue at Trademark Street $350,000
T39 Haven Avenue at Valencia Avenue $350,000
Project Estimate
Resolution No. 14-102 - Page 7 of 12
T40 Haven Avenue at Wilson Avenue $350,000
T41 Hellman Avenue at 8th Street $350,000
T42 Hermosa Avenue at Church Street $350,000
T43 Milliken Avenue at 5th Street $350,000
T44 Milliken Avenue at Wilson Avenue $350,000
T45 Rochester Avenue at Jersey Boulevard $350,000
T46 Spruce Avenue at Elm Avenue $350,000
T47 Spruce Avenue at Mountain View Drive $350,000
T48 Spruce Avenue at Red Oak Street $350,000
T49 Terra Vista Parkway at Spruce Avenue $350,000
T50 Terra Vista Parkway at Town Center Drive $350,000
T51 Town Center Drive at Elm Avenue $350,000
T52 Wilson Avenue at East Avenue $350,000
T53 Wilson Avenue at Etiwanda Avenue $350,000
T54 Wilson Avenue at Etiwanda Avenue (West) $350,000
T55 Wilson Avenue at San Sevaine Road $350,000
T56 Wilson Avenue at Wardman Bullock Road $350,000
T57 Wilson Avenue at Canistel Avenue $350,000
T58 4th Street at Golden Lock Road - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,000
T59 Archibald Avenue at Banyan Street - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,000
T60 Arrow Route at Etiwanda Avenue - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $50,000
T61 Arrow Route at Red Oak Street- Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,000
T62 Arrow Route at White Oak Street- Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,000
T63 Banyan Street at East Avenue - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,000
T64 Base Line Road at Mountain View Drive - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,000
T65 Base Line Road at Spruce Avenue - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,000
T66 Base Line Road at Valencia Avenue - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,000
T67 Day Creek Boulevard at Silverberry Street - Left Tum Phasing Upgrade $25,000
T68 Day Creek Boulevard at Sugar Gum Street- Left Tum Phasing Upgrade $25,000
T69 Day Creek Boulevard at Victoria Park Lane - Left Tum Phasing Upgrade $25,000
T70 Milliken Avenue at Millenium Court - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,000
T71 Milliken Avenue at Mountain View Drive - Left Tum Phasing Upgrade $25,000
T72 Milliken Avenue at Terra Vista Parkway- Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,000
T73 Milliken Avenue at Victoria Park Lane - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,000
T74 Milliken Avenue at Vintage Drive - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,000
Total: $19,600,000
Signal Interconnect System
Project Estimate
SI1 I Signal Interconnect System $7,700,000
Total: $7,700,000
Resolution No. 14-102 - Page 8 of 12
Program Totals
Category Estimate
Freeway Interchanges $67,545,000
Railroad Grade Separations and Crossings $13,480,000
Bridges $15,765,000
Streets $78,808,000
Traffic Signals $19,600,000
Signal Interconnect System $7,700,000
Total: $202,898,000
DIF Program Cost
Item Estimate
Program Total $202,898,000
Less Fund Balance as of 2005 -$20,000,000
Sub-Total $182,898,000
Administration Fee (15%) $27,434,700
Total: $210,332,700
Resolution No. 14-102 - Page 9 of 12
RESOLUTION NO. 14-102
EXHIBIT "B"
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT FEES
Land Use Type Fee
Residential —Single Family Detached Unit $9,002
Residential — Multiple Family Attached Unit $5,401
Apartment or Condominium —Attached Unit $5,401
Senior Housing Attached (Condo or Apartment) — $1,800
Per Bedroom
Nursing /Congregate Care — Per Bed $1,800
Commercial — Per 1,000 Square Feet $13,503
Office/ Business Park— Per 1,000 Square Feet $10,802
Industrial — Per 1,000 Square Feet $5,401
Warehouse— Per 1,000 Square Feet $4,501
Hotel / Motel — Per Room $7,202
Day Care— Per Student $2,251
Self-Storage— Per Unit $180
Service Station— Per Pump $45,010
Resolution No. 14-102 - Page 10 of 12
RESOLUTION NO. 14-102
EXHIBIT "C"
TRANSPORTATION FEE PROGRAM CALCULATIONS
Vacant Land as of February 2005
Vacant Residential Property = 950 acres
Single Family Dwelling Units (SFDU) = 5,363 units
Multi-Family Dwelling Units (MFDU) = 5,248 units
Vacant Industrial Property = 719 acres = 31,319,640 square feet
Assuming that the average floor area ratio for General Industrial is 0.5, then the future
square footage of industrial development is 31,319,640 square feet x 0.5 = 15,659,820
square feet.
Vacant Commercial Property = 334 acres = 14,549,040 square feet
Assuming that the average floor area ratio for General Commercial is 0.25, then the future
square footage of commercial development is 14,549,040 square feet x 0.25 = 3,637,260
square feet.
Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU)per Land Use
Different types of land uses have different traffic trip generation rates. In order for nexus fees to
be tabulated for each type of land use, the "Equivalent Dwelling Units" or EDU for each type of
land use must first be determined. The calculation of a particular land use type's EDU is based
on the traffic trip generation rate for that land use from the ITE Trip Generation Manual. Per City
Resolution No. 91-092, the EDU for various land uses was determined to be as follows:
Land Use Type EDU
Residential —Single Family Detached Unit 1.0 EDU
Residential — Multiple Family Attached Unit 0.6 EDU
Apartment or Condominium —Attached Unit 0.6 EDU
Senior Housing Attached (Condo or Apartment)—Per Bedroom 0.2 EDU
Nursing /Congregate Care — Per Bed 0.2 EDU
Commercial — Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.5 EDU
Office / Business Park— Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.2 EDU
Industrial — Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.6 EDU
Warehouse— Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.5 EDU
Hotel /Motel— Per Room 0.8 EDU
Day Care — Per Student 0.25 EDU
Self-Storage— Per Unit 0.02 EDU
Service Station —Per Pump 5.0 EDU
Resolution No. 14-102 - Page 11 of 12
Total Future Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU)
Future
Land Use Vacant Land EDU by Equivalent
as of February 2005 Land Use Dwelling
Units
Single-Family Dwelling Unit 5,363 Units 1.00 5,363
Multi-Family Dwelling Unit 5,248 Units 0.60 3,149
Industrial Park (per 1,000 SF) 15,659,820 Square Feet 0.60 9,396
Commercial (per 1,000 SF) 3,637,260 Square Feet 1.50 5,455
Total Future EDU 23,363
Calculate Cost per Equivalent Dwelling Unit(EDU)
Item Fees
Total Cost of Projects $210,332,700
Total Future EDU (as of February 2005) 23,363
Cost per EDU $9,002
Calculate Transportation Development Fees by Land Use
Item EDU by Fees
Land Use
Residential — Single Family Detached Unit 1.0 $9,002
Residential —Multiple Family Attached Unit 0.6 $5,401
Apartment or Condominium —Attached Unit 0.6 $5,401
Senior Housing Attached (Condo or Apartment)—Per Bedroom 0.2 $1,800
Nursing / Congregate Care — Per Bed 0.2 $1,800
Commercial — Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.5 $13,503
Office/ Business Park—Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.2 $10,802
Industrial — Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.6 $5,401
Warehouse— Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.5 $4,501
Hotel / Motel — Per Room 0.8 $7,202
Day Care— Per Student 0.25 $2,251
Self-Storage— Per Unit 0.02 $180
Service Station — Per Pump 5.0 $45,010
Resolution No. 14-102 - Page 12 of 12