Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014/06/26 - Agenda Packet - Special city of 16CAA4ON _ _ . AGENDA CITY COUNCIL AND FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT SPECIAL MEETING Thursday, June 26, 2014 -- 5:00 p.m. City Hall 4 City Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive 4- Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 A. CALL TO ORDER: Al. Pledge of Allegiance A2. Roll Call: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo Council Members Alexander, Steinorth and Williams B. COMMUNICATION FROM THE PUBLIC: This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection District and City Council on any item listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Fire Board or City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Board or City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Mayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Mayor and not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. SPECIAL MEETING Thursday, June 26, 2014 4 5:00 p.m. City Hall 4 City Council Chambers Page 1 of 5 --CONTINUED-- FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ' AND CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA .a• ': JUNE 26, 2014 2 -CAgefin 5:00 P.M. — CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Board/City Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Board/Council Member for discussion. C. CONSENT CALENDAR — FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Cl. Approval of the following to be in compliance with Governmental Accounting Standards Board 1 (GASB) Statement No. 54: 1) Updated fund balance policy and 2) a Resolution committing to the level of fiscal reserves for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. RESOLUTION NO. FD 14-011 6 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA COMMITTING TO THE LEVEL OF FISCAL RESERVES FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT C2. Approval of a Resolution adopting Fire District salary schedules for Fiscal Year 2014-15 8 including a part-time employee benefit summary. RESOLUTION NO. FD 14-012 9 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SALARY SCHEDULES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014-15 INCLUDING A PART-TIME EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SUMMARY D. CONSENT CALENDAR — CITY COUNCIL D1. Approval of the following to be in compliance with Governmental Accounting Standards Board 20 (GASB) Statement No. 54: 1) Updated fund balance policy and 2) a Resolution committing to the level of fiscal reserves for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. RESOLUTION NO. 14-103 25 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA COMMITTING TO THE LEVEL OF FISCAL RESERVES FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA D2. Approval of Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Fiscal Year 2014/2015. 27 D3. Approval of updated City general fund reserve funding goals policy. 28 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA ;• ' `, JUNE 26, 2014 acqefio WCAMONGA 5:00 P.M. —CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS D4. Approval of a Resolution adopting salary schedules for Fiscal Year 2014-15, including a part- 33 time employee benefit summary. RESOLUTION NO. 14-104 35 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SALARY SCHEDULES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014-15, INCLUDING A PART-TIME EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SUMMARY AND CITY COUNCIL BENEFITS D5. Approval of a Resolution adopting a Memorandum of Understanding between the City of 49 Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Employees Association for the period 2014- 17 RESOLUTION NO. 14-107 50 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION RELATIVE TO WAGES, BENEFITS AND OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT FOR THE PERIOD JULY 1, 2014 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2017. E. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. E1. Consideration to adopt the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District General Fund 70 preliminary budget in the amount of $26,700,170 and appropriations limit in the amount of $32,084,806 for Fiscal Year 2014/2015 and set final approval of final budget for July 16, 2014. RESOLUTION NO. FD 14-013 72 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A GENERAL FUND APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014/2015 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION E2. Consideration of approval of Resolutions adopting a budget in the amount of $7,159,320 and 74 approving the appropriations limit in the amount of $12,222,021for Fiscal Year 2014/15 in Communities Facilities District (CFD) No. 85-1. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA • • 4 • • t JUNE 26, 2014 ✓TAIVC'HOC.ICAMONGA 5:00 P.M. -CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS RESOLUTION NO. FD 14-014 76 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014/15 RESOLUTION NO. FD 14-015 78 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014/15 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION E3. Consideration of approval of Resolutions adopting a budget in the amount of $2,221,520 and 80 approving the appropriations limit in the amount of $2,924,313 for Fiscal Year 2014/15 in Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 88-1. RESOLUTION NO. FD 14-016 82 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,APPROVING AND ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014/15 RESOLUTION NO. FD 14-017 84 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014/15 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION F. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS CITY COUNCIL The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. F1. Consideration of adoption of Fiscal Year 2014/2015 budget and Article XIIIB appropriations 86 limit. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA • • r • • � I 5 •••• ,J JUNE 2652014 S ANCNOCUCAMONGA 5:00 P.M. -CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS RESOLUTION NO. 14-105 87 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE CITY'S FISCAL YEAR 2014/2015 BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 14-106 89 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE CONSTITUTION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014/2015 G. ADJOURNMENT I • I,Debra L.McNay,Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager,of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee,hereby certify that a true,accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on June 19, 2014 at least twenty-four hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. • II DECLARATION OF POSTING OF AGENDA Debra McNay states and declares as follows: I presently am, and at all times mentioned herein have been, the Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Acting in that capacity, on Thursday, June 19, 2014 at 3:00 p.m., I posted a true and correct copy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council and the Fire Protection District Special Meeting Agenda scheduled for Thursday, June 26, 2014 at 5:00 p.m. to be held in the City Council Chambers at the Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on Thursday, June 19, 2014, at Rancho Cucamonga. City of Rancho Cucamonga By: L Debra . . McNay, MM Assista ity Clerk/Records Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga NOTICE OF SPECIAL-MEETING Notice is hereby given that the Fire Protection District/City Council will hold a Special Meeting on Thursday, June 26, 2014 at 5:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers at the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, for the purpose of: . • • B1. Public communication - C1. Approval of the following to be in compliance with Governmental Accounting Standards Board(GASB) Statement No. 54: 1) Updated fund balance policy and 2) a Resolution committing to the level of fiscal reserves for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. RESOLUTION NO. FD'14-011 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA COMMITTING TO THE LEVEL OF,FISCAL RESERVES FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT C2. Approval of a Resolution adopting Fire District salary schedules for Fiscal Year 2014-15 including a part-time employee benefit summary. . . RESOLUTION NO. FD 14-012 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SALARY SCHEDULES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014-15 INCLUDING A PART-TIME EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SUMMARY Dl. Approval of the following to be in compliance with Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB)Statement No.54: 1) Updated fund balance policy,and 2)a Resolution committing to the level of fiscal reserves for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. RESOLUTION NO. 14-103 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA COMMITTING TO THE LEVEL OF FISCAL RESERVES FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA D2. Approval of Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Fiscal Year 2014/2015. D3. Approval of updated City general fund reserve funding goals policy. D4. Approval of a Resolution adopting salary schedules for Fiscal Year 2014-15, including a part-time employee benefit summary. • RESOLUTION NO. 14-104 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SALARY SCHEDULES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014-15, INCLUDING A PART-TIME EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SUMMARY AND CITY COUNCIL BENEFITS D5. Approval of a Resolution adopting a Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Employees Association for the period 2014-17 RESOLUTION NO. 14-107 • A RESOLUTION OF:THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY1OF RANCHO • CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE MEMORANDUM OF , UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION RELATIVE TO WAGES, BENEFITS AND OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT FOR THE PERIOD JULY 1, 2014 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2017. El. Consideration to adopt the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District General Fund preliminary budget in the amount of $26,700,170 and appropriations limit in the amount of $32,084,806 for Fiscal Year 2014/2015 and set final approval of final budget for July 16, 2014. RESOLUTION NO. FD 14-013 A RESOLUTION.OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN •BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A GENERAL FUND APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014/2015 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION E2. Consideration of approval of Resolutions adopting a budget in the amount of $7,159,320 and approving the appropriations limit in the amount of $12,222,021for Fiscal Year 2014/15 in Communities Facilities District (CFD) No. 85-1. RESOLUTION NO. FD 14-014 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,STATE OF CALIFORNIA,APPROVING AND ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014/15 RESOLUTION NO. FD 14-015 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD'OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014/15 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION E3. Consideration of approval of Resolutions adopting a budget in the amount of $2,221,520 and approving the appropriations limit in the amount of$2,924,313 for Fiscal Year 2014/15 in Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 88-1. • RESOLUTION NO. FD 14-016 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,STATE OF CALIFORNIA,APPROVING AND ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014/15 RESOLUTION NO. FD 14-017 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014/15 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION Fl. Consideration of adoption of Fiscal Year 2014/2015 budget and Article XIIIB appropriations limit. RESOLUTION NO. 14-105 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE CITY'S FISCAL YEAR 2014/2015 BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 14-106 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE CONSTITUTION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014/2015 sakir L!D: is Michael Mayor June 19, 2014 P1 STAFF REPORT ' a ADMIINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT LJ RANCHO Date: June 26, 2014 CUCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director M" Subject: APPROVAL OF THE FOLLOWING TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH GOVERNMENTAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD (GASB) STATEMENT NO. 54: 1) UPDATED FUND BALANCE POLICY AND 2) A RESOLUTION COMMITTING TO THE LEVEL OF FISCAL RESERVES FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Fire Board approve the following to be in compliance with Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 54: 1) Updated Fund Balance Policy and 2) a resolution committing to the level of fiscal reserves for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. BACKGROUND On a regular basis, the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) adopts new policies and procedures that apply to public entities. In the prior year, GASB issued Statement No. 54 which applies to Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions (GASB 54). In order to be in compliance with GASB 54, the Fire District approved a Fund Balance Policy on June 15, 2011 and approved a resolution committing to the level of reserves for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. In order to accommodate any changes to these commitments that may become necessary due to changes in operations or changes in City Council goals, staff annually brings this policy and resolution before the Board for approval at the end of each fiscal year. No changes have been made to the policy for either the Fire District's or the City's commitments. The attached policy is presented to the Fire Board for review and approval. The attached resolution formally establishes the Fire District's fund balance commitments for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2014. I:Vinancelbudget20151City Council staff reportslGASB54-Fire District 2014-15.doc P2 • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT / I Y l FUND BALANCE POLICY RANCHO C UCAMONGA POLICY NO.: - PAGE PAGE 1 OF 4 EFFECTIVE: June 15,2011 REVISED: June 26,2014 APPROVED: PURPOSE This Fund Balance Policy establishes the procedures for the reporting of unrestricted fund balance in the City General Fund and Fire District financial statements. Certain commitments and assignments of fund balance will help ensure that there will be adequate financial resources to protect the City against unforeseen circumstances and events such as revenue shortfalls and unanticipated expenditures. The policy also authorizes and directs the Finance Director to prepare financial reports which accurately categorize fund balance as per Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 54, Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions. GENERAL POLICY Fund balance is essentially the difference between the assets and liabilities reported in a governmental fund. There are five separate components of fund balance, each of which identifies the extent to which the City/Fire District is bound to honor constraints on the specific purposes for which amounts can be spent. • Nonspendable fund balance (Inherently nonspendable) • Restricted fund balance (externally enforceable limitations on use) • Committed fund balance (self-imposed limitations on use) • Assigned fund balance (limitation resulting from intended use) • Unassigned fund balance (residual net resources) The first two components listed above are not addressed in this policy due to the nature of their restrictions. An example of nonspendable fund balance is inventory. Restricted fund balance is either imposed by law or constrained by grantors, contributors, or laws or regulations of other governments. This policy is focused on financial reporting of unrestricted fund balance, or the last three components listed above. These three components are further defined below. P3 Fund Balance Policy Page 2 of 4 Committed Fund Balance The City Council (which also acts as the Board of Directors for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District), as the City's highest level of decision-making authority, may commit fund balance for specific purposes pursuant to constraints imposed by formal actions taken, such as an ordinance or resolution. These committed amounts cannot be used for any other purpose unless the City Council/Fire Board removes or changes the specified use through the same type of formal action taken to establish the commitment. City Council/Fire Board action to commit fund balance needs to occur within the fiscal reporting period; however, the amount can be determined subsequently. • Changes in Economic Circumstances The City's General Fund balance committed for changes in economic circumstances is established at a goal of a six month reserve, or 50% of the City General Fund operating budget for the upcoming fiscal year. The Fire District's fund balance committed for changes in economic circumstances is established at a goal of a six month reserve, or 50% of the Fire District's operating budget for the upcoming fiscal year. As defined in the resolution establishing this commitment, the specific uses are listed as the declaration of a state or federal state of emergency or a local emergency as defined in Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.36.020; or a change in economic circumstances in a given fiscal year that results in revenues to the City/Fire District being insufficient to cover expenditures for one or more fiscal years. The City Council/Fire Board may, by the affirming vote of three members, change the amount of this commitment and/or the specific uses of these monies. • City Facilities Capital Repair The City's General Fund balance committed for City facilities capital repair and property acquisition is established at a minimum goal of 25% of capital assets value comprised of construction in progress (excluding infrastructure), building improvements, and improvements other than building for governmental activities. • Fire District Facilities Capital Repair The Fire District's fund balance committed for the Fire District facilities capital repair is hereby committed to a minimum goal of 50% of capital assets value comprised of construction in progress (excluding infrastructure), building improvements, and improvements other than building for public safety-fire activities. • Working Capital The City's General Fund balance committed for Working Capital is established at a goal of a minimum of 5% of the City's General Fund operating budget for the upcoming fiscal P4 Fund Balance Policy Page 3 of 4 year. The Fire District's fund balance committed for Working Capital is established at a goal of a minimum of 50% of the District's operating budget for the upcoming fiscal year. • Self-Insurance The City's General Fund balance committed for payment of general liability claims primarily through the use of interest earnings on the reserve but not limited to such in the event of an unfavorable interest rate environment is established at a minimum goal of three times the City's total yearly SIR for all types of insurance coverage. • Employee Leave Payouts The City's General Fund balance and the Fire District's fund balance committed for employee leave payouts as valued in accordance with the City's labor contracts as of the last day of the fiscal year. • PERS Rate Stabilization The City's General Fund and Fire District's fund balance committed to offset projected rate increases identified in the respective annual Ca1PERS actuarial valuation for two fiscal years after the year of financial reporting. • Dispatch System Acquisition The Fire District's fund balance committed to JPA membership for the District's current dispatch system. • Booking Fees The City's General Fund balance committed to provide funding for an increase in the booking fees charged to the City by the County of San Bernardino not readily determinable at the time of budget adoption due to the delay in the adoption of the State of California's budget. • Vehicle and Equipment Replacement The Fire District's fund balance committed for the replacement of fire safety vehicles and equipment as determined based on the District's replacement criteria is established at a minimum goal of 50% of District vehicle and equipment replacement value. • Law Enforcement The City's General Fund balance committed for public safety purposes. P5 Fund Balance Policy Page 4 of 4 • Contract Development Services The City's General Fund balance committed for contract development services. Assigned Fund Balance Amounts that are constrained by the City/Fire District's intent to be used for specific purposes, but are neither restricted nor committed, should be reported as assigned fund balance. This policy hereby delegates the authority to assign amounts to be used for specific purposes to the City Manager and/or Finance Director for the purpose of reporting these amounts in the annual financial statements. The following are a few non-exclusive examples of assigned fund balance. • Field Rehab Established to provide funding sufficient to regularly rehabilitate the various sports fields, basketball/volleyball courts,and parks not fully funded by special assessments on a rotating basis as determined by management. • Healthy RC Established to provide funding for the various programs and initiatives sponsored by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to promote healthy eating and active living within the City. Included in this reserve is funding for energy efficiency projects on City facilities Unassigned Fund Balance These are residual positive net resources of the General Fund and Fire District funds in excess of what can properly be classified in one of the other four categories. Fund Balance Classification The accounting policies of the City/Fire District consider restricted fund balance to have been spent first when an expenditure is incurred for purposes for which both restricted and unrestricted fund balance is available. Similarly, when an expenditure is incurred for purposes for which amounts in any of the unrestricted classifications of fund balance could be used, the City/Fire District considers committed amounts to be reduced first, followed by assigned amounts and then unassigned amounts. This policy is in place to provide a measure of protection for the City/Fire District against unforeseen circumstances and to comply with GASB Statement No. 54. No other policy or procedure supersedes the authority and provisions of this policy. P6 RESOLUTION NO. FD14-011 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA COMMITTING TO THE LEVEL OF FISCAL RESERVES FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Board desires to protect existing services, and; WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Board desires to be prepared for emergencies, and; WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Board desires to maintain good fiscal management and fiscal structure to operate a municipal corporation; NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, San Bernardino, California does hereby resolve on this 26'^ day of June 2014 that the level of fiscal reserves maintained by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District as of fiscal year end are committed to the goals as outlined in the District's Fund Balance policy, attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 26«' day of June 2014. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P7 Resolution No. FD14-011 Page 2 I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, San Bernardino County, California, at an adjourned meeting of said Board of Directors held on the 26th day of June 2014. Executed this day of June 2014, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk • i:Vnancelbudget20151City Council staff reportstresolution committing to the level of fiscal reserves-Fire 14-15.doc P8 v STAFF REPORT h ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES GROUP Li RANCHO Date: June 26, 2014 CUCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services By: Robert Neiuber, Human Resources Director f"" Subject: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING FIRE DISTRICT SALARY SCHEDULES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014-15 INCLUDING A PART-TIME EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Fire Board of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District adopt the attached resolution approving the Fiscal Year 2014-15 salary schedules for Fire District job classifications including a part-time employee benefit summary. BACKGROUND The Fire Board traditionally adopts salary resolutions biannually for those classifications employed by the Fire District. These resolutions are updated to reflect changes in salaries, steps, additions and deletions of classifications, changes in job titles and other terms of employment. This resolution includes the following changes: • An increase in available merit steps approved in the 2014-2017 Fire Management Group, Fire Union and Fire Support MOU's previously adopted by the City Council. • A part-time employee benefit summary that also provides the basis for the work life balance part-time positions envisioned in the proposed Fiscal Year 2014-15 Budget. Attachment 1. Resolution 14-012 2. Salary Schedule for Fire Management Group Classifications 3. Salary Schedule for Fire Union Job Classifications 4. Salary Schedule for Fire Support Services Association Job Classifications 5. Salary Schedule for Fire Support Services Association Part-Time Job Classifications 6. Part-Time Employee Benefit Summary P9 RESOLUTION NO. 14-012 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SALARY SCHEDULES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014-15 INCLUDING A PART-TIME EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SUMMARY. WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District has determined that it is necessary for the efficient operation and management of the District that policies be established prescribing salary ranges, benefits and holidays and other policies for employees of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District has previously adopted salary resolutions that established salary ranges, benefits and other terms of employment for employees of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District recognizes that it is necessary from time to time to amend the salary resolution to accommodate changes in position titles, classifications salary ranges, benefits and other terms of employment including an outline of State and Federally required benefits afforded to part-time employees; and • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Rancho Cucamonga, California to approve the attached salary schedules for the Fire Union, Fire Management Employees Group and Fire Support Services Association (Attachments 1-4) and approve the part-time benefit summary (Attachment 5). PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 26th day of June 2014. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, President P1O ATTEST: Janice Reynolds, Secretary I, Janice Reynolds, Secretary of the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a Meeting of said Board on the 26th day of June, 2014. Executed this 26th day of June, 2014 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice Reynolds, Secretary P11 N r 0 C O Z c O O N a) >, T T T T T • o 1 CO o 1 0 0 y 0 0 . 0 0 e 0 0 1 0 rE2 iE2 2co2 2m2 2m2 2m2 CO O CO CO O CO CO CO W I I I i CO CO co I e I 1 I e , I I I I i CO C W C O N N O N N - CO N- CI M CO CO CO W N _ M r C co N O N C O t` W C O O C W of (h LO C co O OO N- (OO OO C (o C N CO 0 0 CO O M N., C � CO O N C Ln 0)C O C) CO N-- co c.6 c6 LO LUN a O N r D O. NT r r W N r 0 O O O CO N O O M O CO N O C co 0 0 (` CO f� IA �/ O CO CO CO C CO 'Zr CO W W a. W 'Cr. CO IX N LL W M W r CD M V CCOO CO W 00L° Cn in ca r7 N V V C` C o (O O V O N t- LO O r O C6 N V L6 r O O M N- 46 Cor r W J O Cr O r CO Cr N- CO N r O O N CO Or- co NOW O � C O r C ? CO o r to Ni CO V' CO W m M V W N W M C M (O N M co M r V A C CO W CO O N N r r 'Cr CO O (O CO O in n u) N. W N- W O O O O N N (O O CO N O LL W C CO ` CO O CO O Q r r 4. Z J O O. cO W (O W N O co(O C CO W C LO r N F o. C[ C W 5 co o0O N- 000) CO Or 0) Or Q oiv (•i odo ` N VI- Oi4N: O0 a -4- LC) W 0 n CO CO W C[Oi O N CO W CO M W WO W W M r m � uir co v0 o ao W r LL Z V O CO C W LU Cl O CO C W C r W O n M W O W W W O O LL) N IC CO N W C V 7 C CO r w U rco co 4- co O v CO co ote (i t COO 0 el Z oa N- W =_ (o ((i r c O) V o) M a0 Q in O O O (O CO N N CO V' CO CO C CO O CO M N W M r o) W M C M M C r W ` I- CO W C CO Z N r N O O W W C W CO O W W C CO Q m N- O C co co O M 'Cr N CO C N CO 0 (O O I� W O co CO C co C r M n C Cn N V O CO O) V' O M t` 0 W .J C r co O CO CO O O N 0) O CO 0) W O N CO a < O CO N C W CO N CO I. N W o? O J W C co ,^ co u') O O CO CO N N M C a LL (// Q co in to (n rn M ' N (n 't r a (n (o F � m rn In O) N N r 0 O) th r F Cr) N- OD r vo vO t O Q r r m LL LL W_ W_ LL = _ W U Y U Y 2 Z a) Z a) U O 0 O 0 a LL m Q 0O Q o N w a ct U 0 0 o m o 5 K K X co et 0 ce LL L.T. LL in LL LL • • Resolution No. 14-012 P12 FIRE UNION ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES JULY 1, 2014 A B C D E F G FIRE CAPTAIN 27.64 29.02 30.47 32.00 33.59 35.27 37.04 Hourly 3,095.51 3,250.29 3,412.80 3,583.44 3,762.61 3,950.74 4,148.28 Bi-Weekly 6,706.94 7,042.29 7,394.40 7,764.12 8,152.33 8,559.95 8,987.94 Monthly FIRE CAPTAIN 27.64 29.02 30.47 32.00 33.59 35.27 37.04 Hourly SPECIALIST 3,095.51 3,250.29 3,412.80 3,583.44 3,762.61 3,950.74 4,148.28 Bi-Weekly 6,706.94 7,042.29 7,394.40 7,764.12 8,152.33 8,559.95 8,987.94 Monthly FIRE ENGINEER 23.56 24.74 25.97 27.27 28.64 30.07 31.57 Hourly 2,638.52 2,770.45 2,908.97 3,054.42 3,207.14 3,367.50 3,535.87 Bi-Weekly 5,716.80 6,002.64 6,302.77 6,617.91 6,948.81 7,296.25 7,661.06 Monthly FIREFIGHTER 20.59 21.62 22.70 23.83 25.03 26.28 27.59 Hourly 2,306.00 2,421.31 2,542.37 2,669.49 2,802.96 2,943.11 3,090.27 Bi-Weekly 4,996.34 5,246.16 5,508.47 5,783.89 6,073.09 6,376.74 6,695.58 Monthly FIRE INSPECTOR 23.56 24.74 25.97 27.27 28.64 30.07 31.57 Hourly 2,638.52 2,770.45 2,908.97 3,054.42 3,207.14 3,367.50 3,535.67 Bi-Weekly 5,716.80 6,002.64 6,302.77 6,617.91 6,948.81 7,296.25 7,661.06 Monthly FIELD TRAINING OFFICER 27.64 29.02 30.47 32.00 33.59 35.27 37.04 Hourly 3,095.51 3,250.29 3,412.80 3,583.44 3,762.61 3,950.74 4,148.28 Bi-Weekly 6,706.94 7,042.29 7,394.40 7,764.12 8,152.33 8,559.95 8,987.94 Monthly HAZARDOUS MATERIAL STIPEND(5%of Fire Enqr.Step E) 1.43 1.43 1.43 1.43 1.43 1.43 1.43 Hourly 160.36 160.36 . 160.36 160.36 160.36 160.36 160.36 Bi-Weekly 347.44 347.44 347.44 347.44 347.44 347.44 347.44 Monthly PARAMEDIC STIPEND(13.92%of Fire Enqr.Step E) 3.99 3.99 3.99 3.99 3.99 3.99 3.99 Hourly 446.43 446.43 446.43 446.43 446.43 446.43 446.43 Bi-Weekly 967.27 967.27 967.27 967.27 967.27 967.27 967.27 Monthly FIELD TRAINING OFFICER STIPEND(9.3%of Fire Cant Step E) 3.12 3.12 3.12 3.12 3.12 3.12 3.12 Hourly 349.92 349.92 349.92 349.92 349.92 349.92 349.92 Bi-Weekly 758.17 758.17 758.17 758.17 758.17 758.17 758.17 Monthly TECHNICAL RESCUE STIPEND(5%of Fire Enqr.Step E) 1.43 1.43 1.43 143 1.43 1.43 1.43 Hourly 160.36 160.36 160.36 160.36 160.36 160.36 160.36 Bi-Weekly 347.44 347.44 347.44 347.44 347.44 347.44 347.44 Monthly TERRORISM LIAISON OFFICER STIPEND(5%of Fire Enqr.Step E) 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 Hourly 80.18 80.18 80.18 80.18 80.18 80.18 80.18 Bi-Weekly 173.72 173.72 173.72 173.72 173.72 173.72 173.72 Monthly • P13 Resolution #14-012 FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES ASSOCIATION SALARY SCHEDULE AS OF JULY 1, 2014 A B C D E F COMMUNICATIONS TECHNICIAN 24.38 25.60 26.88 28.23 29.64 31.12 Hourly 1,950.59 2,048.12 2,150.52 2,258.05 2,370.96 2,489.50 Bi-Weekly 4,226.27 4,437.60 4,659.47 4,892.44 5,137.07 5,393.93 Monthly EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 34.90 36.69 38.56 40.53 . 42.39 44.51 Hourly COORDINATOR 2,792.07 2,934.86 3,084.95 3,242.72 3,391.59 3,561.17 Bi-Weekly 6,049.00 6,359.00 6,684.00 7,026.00 7,348.00 7,715.40 Monthly EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES 37.51 39.38 41.35 43.42 45.59 47.87 Hourly ADMINISTRATOR 3,000.67 3,150.71 3,308.24 3,473.65 3,647.34 3,829.70 Bi-Weekly 6,501.46 6,826.53 7,167.86 7,526.25 7,902.56 8,297.69 Monthly FIRE EQUIPMENT APPRENTICE 18.58 19.51 20.48 21.51 22.58 23.71 Hourly MECHANIC 1,486.16 1,560.47 1,638.49 1,720.42 1,806.44 1,896.77 Bi-Weekly 3,220.02 3,381.02 3,550.07 3,727.58 3,913.96 4,109.66 Monthly FIRE EQUIPMENT LEAD MECHANIC 25.60 26.88 28.23 29.64 31.12 32.67 Hourly 2,048.12 2,150.52 2,258.05 2,370.95 2,489.50 2,613.98 Bi-Weekly 4437.59 4659.47 4892.44 5137.06 5393.92 5,663.62 Monthly FIRE EQUIPMENT MECHANIC 23.22 24.38 25.60 26.88 28.23 29.64 Hourly 1,857.70 1,950.59 2,048.12 2,150.53 2,258.05 2,370.96 Bi-Weekly 4,025.02 4,226.27 4,437.59 4,659.47 4,892.45 5,137.07 Monthly FIRE INFORMATION SYSTEMS 23.14 24.29 25.51 26.78 28.12 29.53 Hourly TECHNICIAN 1,850.93 1,943.47 2,040.64 2,142.68 2,249.81 2,362.30 Bi-Weekly 4,010.34 4,210.85 4,421.40 4,642.47 4,874.59 5,118.32 Monthly FIRE PREVENTION SPECIALIST 24.49 25.72 27.00 28.35 29.77 31.26 Hourly INSPECTION I 1,959.35 2,057.32 2,160.19 2,268.20 2,381.61 2,500.69 Bi-Weekly 4,245.26 4,457.52 4,680.40 4,914.42 5,160.15 5,418.15 Monthly FIRE PREVENTION SPECIALIST 27.00 28.35 29.77 31.26 32.82 34.46 Hourly INSPECTION II 2,160.18 2,268.19 2,381.60 2,500.69 2,625.72 2,757.00 Bi-Weekly 4,680.40 4,914.42 5,160.14 5,418.16 5,689.06 5,973.51 Monthly FIRE SHOP SUPERVISOR 30.72 32.26 33.87 35.56 37.34 39.21 Hourly 2,457.74 2,580.63 2,709.66 2,845.14 2,987.40 3,136.77 Bi-Weekly 5,325.11 5,591.36 5,870.93 6,164.48 6,472.70 6,796.34 Monthly MAINTENANCE OFFICER 34.92 36.67 38.50 40.42 42.45 44.57 Hourly 2,793.57 2,933.25 3,079.92 3,233.91 3,395.61 3,565.39 Bi-Weekly 6,052.74 6,355.38 6,673.15 7,006.81 7,357.16 7,725.02 Monthly P14 • FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES ASSOCIATION SALARY SCHEDULE AS OF JULY 1, 2014 A B C D E F MANAGEMENT AIDE 24.01 25.24 26.53 27.88 29.16 30.62 Hourly 1,920.76 2,018.98 2,122.24 2,230.77 2,333.18 2,449.84 Bi-Weekly 4,164.00 4,377.00 4,601.00 4,836.00 5,058.00 5,310.90 Monthly MANAGEMENT ANALYST I 27.88 29.31 30.81 32.39 33.87 35.56 Hourly 2,230.77 2,344.85 2,464.76 2,590.81 2,709.76 2,845.25 Bi-Weekly 4,833.00 5,080.00 5,340.00 5,613.00 5,871.00 6,164.55 Monthly MANAGEMENT ANALYST II 32.06 33.70 35.43 37.24 38.95 40.90 Hourly 2,565.09 2,696.28 2,834.17 2,979.11 3,115.88 3,271.67 Bi-Weekly 5,557.00 5,842.00 6,140.00 6,454.00 6,751.00 7,088.55 Monthly MANAGEMENT ANALYST III 34.90 36.69 38.56 40.53 42.39 44.51 Hourly 2,792.07 2,934.86 3,084.95 3,242.72 3,391.59 3,561.17 Bi-Weekly 6,049.00 6,359.00 6,684.00 7,026.00 7,348.00 7,715.40 Monthly OFFICE SERVICES CLERK 16.85 17.71 18.62 19.57 20.47 21.49 Hourly 1,347.98 1,416.91 1,489.37 1,565.54 1,637.41 1,719.28 Bi-Weekly 2,922.00 3,072.00 3,229.00 3,394.00 3,550.00 3,727.50 Monthly OFFICE SPECIALIST I 15.25 16.03 16.85 17.71 18.52 19.45 Hourly 1,220.00 1,282.39 1,347.98 1,416.91 1,481.96 1,556.06 Bi-Weekly 2,645.00 2,780.00 2,922.00 3,072.00 3,213.00 3,373.65 Monthly OFFICE SPECIALIST II 16.85 17.71 18.62 19.57 20.47 21.49 Hourly 1,347.98 1,416.91 1,489.37 1,565.54 1,637.41 1,719.28 Bi-Weekly 2,922.00 3,072.00 3,229.00 3,394.00 3,550.00 3,727.50 Monthly PLANS EXAMINER- FIRE 32.08 33.68 35.37 37.13 38.99 40.94 Hourly 2,566.22 2,694.54 2,829.26 2,970.73 3,119.26 3,275.22 Bi-Weekly 5,560.15 5,838.16 6,130.07 6,436.57 6,758.39 7,096.31 Monthly PUBLIC EDUCATION 27.00 28.35 29.77 31.26 32.82 34.46 Hourly SPECIALIST 2,160.18 2,268.19 2,381.60 2,500.69 2,625.72 2,757.01 Bi-Weekly 4,680.40 4,914.42 5,160.14 5,418.16 5,689.06 5,973.51 Monthly SECRETARY 19.09 20.04 21.04 22.09 23.20 24.36 Hourly 1,526.81 1,603.15 1,683.31 1,767.47 1,855.85 1,948.64 81-Weekly 3,308.09 3,473.50 3,647.17 3,829.53 4,021.00 4,222.06 Monthly SENIOR ADMINISTRATIVE 24.49 25.73 27.01 28.36 29.77 31.26 Hourly SECRETARY 1,959.30 2,057.26 2,160.12 2,268.13 2,381.54 2,500.62 Bi-Weekly 4,245.15 4,457.40 4,680.27 4,914.29 5,160.00 5,418.00 Monthly • P15 Resolution # 14-012 FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES PART-TIME HOURLY SALARY SCHEDULE AS OF JULY 1, 2014 A B C D E F COMMUNICATIONS TECHNICIAN 24.38 25.60 26.88 28.23 29.64 31.12 Hourly EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES 41.14 43.20 45.36 47.62 50.01 52.51 Hourly QUALITY IMPROVEMENT NURSE FIRE CLERK 10.24 10.75 11.29 11.85 12.45 13.07 Hourly FIRE EQUIPMENT MECHANIC 23.22 24.38 25.60 26.88 28.23 29.64 Hourly FIRE INFORMATION SYSTEMS 23.14 24.29 25.51 26.78 28.12 29.53 Hourly TECHNICIAN FIRE PREVENTION ASSISTANT 10.24 10.75 11.29 11.85 12.45 13.07 Hourly TEMPORARY/PART-TIME FIRE PREVENTION SPECIALIST 24.49 25.72 27.00 28.35 29.77 31.26 Hourly INSPECTION I MANAGEMENT AIDE 24.01 25.21 26.47 27.79 29.18 30.64 Hourly MANAGEMENT ANALYST I 32.06 33.66 35.35 37.11 38.97 40.92 Hourly OFFICE SERVICES CLERK 16.85 17.69 18.58 19.51 20.48 21.51 Hourly OFFICE SPECIALIST I 15.25 16.01 16.81 17.65 18.54 19.46 Hourly OFFICE SPECIALIST II 16.85 17.69 18.58 19.51 20.48 21.50 Hourly PLANS EXAMINER- FIRE 32.08 33.68 35.37 37.13 38.99 40.94 Hourly QUALITY IMPROVEMENT 27.79 29.18 30.64 32.17 33.78 35.47 Hourly SPECIALIST P16 PART-TIME EMPLOYEE BENEFITS SUMMARY ADOPTED PER RESOLUTION NO. 14-012 JUNE 26, 2014 The following benefits are approved via resolution by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District effective the first full pay period in July 2014. All part-time employees are employed "at-will" and serve at the pleasure of the appointing authority. As such, their services can be discontinued without cause or right of appeal. The District determines the number of part-time employees required in order to meet their needs depending on their approved budget for part-time employees and the approval of the City Manager In general, part-time employees are only eligible for mandated State and Federal benefits except for specifically designated Work Life Balance Part-time employees as outlined below under the "Work-life Balance Section." Definition — PART-TIME EMPLOYEE: A person serving in a budgeted position of less than forty (40) hours per week on average over a year, and typically less than 1,040 hours per year as further defined under Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Personnel Rules and Regulations 11(c). Part-time employees are at-will and may be terminated without cause or right of appeal. Retirement Benefits — The District either provides access to retirement benefits through the Accumulation Program for Part-Time Limited-service Employees (APPLE) or the California Public Employees Retirement System (CaIPERS) as outlined below. APPLE — Part-time employees who work less than 1,000 hours in a fiscal year, are not a current CaIPERS Member or who otherwise do not qualify for CaIPERS retirement benefits under State law or CaIPERS regulations must contribute 7.5% of base pay to APPLE — a required alternative retirement system. CaIPERS — Part-time employees who work 1,000 hours or more in a fiscal year, are hired to work more than 20 hours per week on average, are current CaIPERS Members or who otherwise would qualify for CaIPERS retirement benefits under State law or CaIPERS regulations must contribute the full employee member contribution towards their CaIPERS retirement benefits and "New Members" as defined by CaIPERS must pay half the normal cost. The CaIPERS retirement benefits available for qualifying part-time employees depend on the date the employee qualified for CaIPERS benefits. Tier 1 Part-time Employees who qualified for CaIPERS benefits before July 9, 2011 § 21354.4 2.5% at 55 Full Formula § 21574 4th Level 1959 Survivor § 20042 1 Year Final Compensation PART-TIME EMPLOYEE BENEFITS SUMMARY P17 Tier 2 Part-time Employees who qualified for Ca1PERS benefits on or after July 9, 2011 and before January 1, 2013 § 21354 2% @ 55 Full Formula § 21574 4th Level 1959 Survivor § 20037 3 Year Final Compensation Tier 3 Part-time Employees not considered "New Members" by Ca1PERS who qualified for Ca1PERS benefits on or After January 1, 2013 § 21354 2% @ 55 Full Formula § 21574 4th Level 1959 Survivor § 20037 3 Year Final Compensation Tier 4 Part-time Employees meeting the CaIPERS definition of"New Members" who qualified for Ca1PERS benefits on or After January 1, 2013 § 7522.20 2% @ 62 Full Formula § 7522.32 36 Consecutive Months § 7522.10 Based on Pensionable Compensation Unit members hired on and after January 1, 2013, deemed to be a "new member" as defined in Government Code § 7522.04, shall individually pay an initial Member CALPERS contribution rate of 50% of the normal cost rate for the Defined Benefit Plan in which said "new member" is enrolled, rounded to the nearest quarter of 1%, or the current contribution rate of similarly situated employees, whichever is greater. This rate can increase based on Ca1PERS regulations. The District does not participate in Social Security except for the mandatory Medicare Program. Medical Insurance Benefits — The District provides access to medical insurance for part-time employees who qualify for the Affordable Care Act (ACA) under the Districts' policy. In general, employees who work 30 or more hours per week on average per year would qualify, but the District's policy and the federal law determine who specifically qualifies for these benefits. For those part- time employees who qualify for this benefit, the District contributes the cost of the lowest cost self only coverage minus 9.5% of the Federal Poverty Line rounded down to the nearest dollar towards the cost of medical insurance. For example: In 2014, the FPL was $972.50 per month, and 9.5% of that is 92.38/month. In 2014, the lowest cost self-only coverage cost was Blue Shield Net Value — costing $395.00 per month. Following the policy, the District would pay $303 towards any health care plan the ACA eligible part-time employee chooses and the employee would pay the difference, which for the lowest cost self-only coverage would be $92.00. Page 2 of 4 P18 PART-TIME EMPLOYEE BENEFITS SUMMARY WORK-LIFE BALANCE PART-TIME EMPLOYEES BENEFITS FOR SPECIFICALLY DESIGNATED POSITION Specifically designated Part-time employees in specific management, supervisory, professional and/or confidential type positions, as designated by the City Manager and noted on the Personnel Action Report, who are scheduled to work 32 hours per week on a year-round basis, are referred to as work-life balance part-time employees. The City Manager will review and if appropriate amend the list of designated work life balance employees at least once per year as part of his/her budget review process. Work-life balance part-time employees participate in the State and Federally required benefits as enumerated above and shall receive the following additional benefits: Medical Insurance: In accordance with the District's ACA policy; work-life balance part-time employees are eligible to participate in the District's medical plan. The District will pay the higher of the ACA policy contribution or 80% of the cost the District would pay for a full-time employee in the same position towards medical insurance premium costs. In 2013, the maximum the District would pay for medical insurance for an employee only would be $395 for a full time employee hired after 1994, so following this policy a work-life balance part-time employee would receive $316 towards the cost of the medical coverage that they choose. In 2013, the maximum the District would pay for medical insurance for an employee and family (2 dependents or more) would be $1,028.30 for a full time employee hired after 1994, so following this policy a work-life balance part-time employee covering themselves and their family would receive $822.64 towards the cost of the medical coverage that they choose. Dental Insurance: District paid Vision: District Paid Life Insurance: District Paid $30,000 base coverage Vacation: Work-life balance part-time employees accrue vacation hours at 80% of the rate of full-time employees in the same position. Work-life balance part-time employees can accumulate vacation hours up to two times the highest annual accrual rate that full-time employees in the same position can earn. Once they reach their maximum accrual rate they stop earning vacation hours until they bring their vacation hours below the maximum accrual rate. Work-life balance employees may only cash out vacation hours upon separation from the District. Work-life balance part-time employees transitioning from a full-time position with the District may either cash out their vacation per their MOU or carry over their accrued vacation balance to the work- life balance part-time position. Sick Leave: Work-life balance part-time employees accrue 8 hours of sick leave per month. No cash out or buyback of sick leave is provided to work-life balance part-time employees. Work- life balance part-time employees transitioning from a full-time position with the District may either cash out their sick leave per their MOU or carry over their accrued sick leave balance to the work-life balance part-time position. Page 3 of 4 P19 PART-TIME EMPLOYEE BENEFITS SUMMARY Holidays: Work-life balance part-time employees will be compensated for normally scheduled working hours, which fall on official District holidays. The District observes 11 holidays per year: Independence Day, Labor Day, Veteran's Day, Thanksgiving Day and the day following, Christmas Eve, Christmas Day, New Year's Day, Martin Luther King's Birthday, President's Day and Memorial Day. Deferred Compensation Plans: Work-life balance part-time employees are eligible to participate in the District's deferred compensation plans. The District does not contribute. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING ALL PART-TIME POSITIONS Medicare: Employees hired after 1/1/86, are required to contribute 1.45% of their earnings. All Part-Time employees are subject to specific provisions of the Fire Districts Personnel Rules and Regulations 11(c) and specific provisions of the Policy and Procedures Manual (Policy 200- 01) that apply to them. Page 4 of 4 P20 STAFF REPORT tat ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT LJ RANCHO Date: June 26, 2014 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Subject: APPROVAL OF THE FOLLOWING TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH GOVERNMENTAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD (GASB) STATEMENT NO. 54: 1) UPDATED FUND BALANCE POLICY AND 2)A RESOLUTION COMMITTING TO THE LEVEL OF FISCAL RESERVES FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the following to be in compliance with Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 54: 1) Updated Fund Balance Policy and 2) a resolution committing to the level of fiscal reserves for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. BACKGROUND On a regular basis, the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) adopts new policies and procedures that apply to public entities. In the prior year, GASB issued a new procedure, Statement No. 54, which applies to Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions (GASB 54). In order to be in compliance with GASB 54, the City Council approved a Fund Balance Policy on June 15, 2011 and approved a resolution committing to the level of reserves for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In order to accommodate any changes to these commitments that may become necessary due to changes in operations or changes in City Council goals, staff will annually bring this policy and resolution before the City Council for approval at the end of each fiscal year. No changes have been made to the policy for either the City's or the Fire District's commitments. The attached policy is presented to the City Council for review and approval. The attached resolution formally establishes the City of Rancho Cucamonga's fund balance commitments for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2014. I:financelhudget20151City Council staff reportsIGASB54-City 2014-15.doc P21 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RANCHO CUCAMONGA trk % FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FUND BALANCE POLICY RANCHO CUCAMONGA POLICY NO.: -_ PAGE 1 OF 4 EFFECTIVE: June 15,2011 REVISED: June 26, 2014 APPROVED: PURPOSE This Fund Balance Policy establishes the procedures for the reporting of unrestricted fund balance in the City General Fund and Fire District financial statements. Certain commitments and assignments of fund balance will help ensure that there will be adequate financial resources to protect the City against unforeseen circumstances and events such as revenue shortfalls and unanticipated expenditures. The policy also authorizes and directs the Finance Director to prepare financial reports which accurately categorize fund balance as per Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 54; Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions. GENERAL POLICY Fund balance is essentially the difference between the assets and liabilities reported in a governmental fund. There are five separate components of fund balance, each of which identifies the extent to which the City/Fire District is bound to honor constraints on the specific purposes for which amounts can be spent. • Nonspendable fund balance (inherently nonspendable) • Restricted fund balance (externally enforceable limitations on use) • Committed fund balance (self-imposed limitations on use) • Assigned fund balance (limitation resulting from intended use) • Unassigned fund balance (residual net resources) The first two components listed above are not addressed in this policy due to the nature of their restrictions. An example of nonspendable fund balance is inventory. Restricted fund balance is either imposed by law or constrained by grantors, contributors, or laws or regulations of other governments. This policy is focused on financial reporting of unrestricted fund balance, or the last three components listed above. These three components are further defined below. P22 Fund Balance Policy Page 2 of 4 Committed Fund Balance The City Council (which also acts as the Board of Directors for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District), as the City's highest level of decision-making authority, may commit fund balance for specific purposes pursuant to constraints imposed by formal actions taken, such as an ordinance or resolution. These committed amounts cannot be used for any other purpose unless the City Council/Fire Board removes or changes the specified use through the same type of formal action taken to establish the commitment. City Council/Fire Board action to commit fund balance needs to occur within the fiscal reporting period; however, the amount can be determined subsequently. • Changes in Economic Circumstances The City's General Fund balance committed for changes in economic circumstances is established at a goal of a six month reserve, or 50% of the City General Fund operating budget for the upcoming fiscal year. The Fire District's fund balance committed for changes in economic circumstances is established at a goal of a six month reserve, or 50% of the Fire District's operating budget for the upcoming fiscal year. As defined in the resolution establishing this commitment, the specific uses are listed as the declaration of a state or federal state of emergency or a local emergency as defined in Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.36.020; or a change in economic circumstances in a given fiscal year that results in revenues to the City/Fire District being insufficient to cover expenditures for one or more fiscal years. The City Council/Fire Board may, by the affirming vote of three members, change the amount of this commitment and/or the specific uses of these monies. • City Facilities Capital Repair The City's General Fund balance committed for City facilities capital repair and property acquisition is established at a minimum goal of 25% of capital assets value comprised of construction in progress (excluding infrastructure), building improvements, and improvements other than building for governmental activities. • Fire District Facilities Capital Repair The Fire District's fund balance committed for the Fire District facilities capital repair is hereby committed to a minimum goal of 50% of capital assets value comprised of construction in progress (excluding infrastructure), building improvements, and improvements other than building for public safety-fire activities. • Working Capital The City's General Fund balance committed for Working Capital is established at a goal of a minimum of 5% of the City's General Fund operating budget for the upcoming fiscal P23 Fund Balance Policy Page 3 of 4 year. The Fire District's fund balance committed for Working Capital is established at a goal of a minimum of 50% of the District's operating budget for the upcoming fiscal year. • Self-Insurance The City's General Fund balance committed for payment of general liability claims primarily through the use of interest earnings on the reserve but not limited to such in the event of an unfavorable interest rate environment is established at a minimum goal of three times the City's total yearly SIR for all types of insurance coverage. • Employee Leave Payouts The City's General Fund balance and the Fire District's fund balance committed for employee leave payouts as valued in accordance with the City's labor contracts as of the last day of the fiscal year. • PERS Rate Stabilization The City's General Fund and Fire District's fund balance committed to offset projected rate increases identified in the respective annual Ca1PERS actuarial valuation for two fiscal years after the year of financial reporting. • Dispatch System Acquisition The Fire District's fund balance committed to JPA membership for the District's current dispatch system. • Booking Fees The City's General Fund balance committed to provide funding for an increase in the booking fees charged to the City by the County of San Bernardino not readily determinable at the time of budget adoption due to the delay in the adoption of the State of California's budget. • Vehicle and Equipment Replacement The Fire District's fund balance committed for the replacement of fire safety vehicles and equipment as determined based on the District's replacement criteria is established at a minimum goal of 50% of District vehicle and equipment replacement value. • Law Enforcement The City's General Fund balance committed for public safety purposes. P24 Fund Balance Policy Page 4 of 4 • Contract Development Services The City's General Fund balance committed for contract development services. Assigned Fund Balance Amounts that are constrained by the City/Fire District's intent to be used for specific purposes, but are neither restricted nor committed, should be reported as assigned fund balance. This policy hereby delegates the authority to assign amounts to be used for specific purposes to the City Manager and/or Finance Director for the purpose of reporting these amounts in the annual financial statements. The following are a few non-exclusive examples of assigned fund balance. • Field Rehab Established to provide funding sufficient to regularly rehabilitate the various sports fields, basketball/volleyball courts,and parks not fully funded by special assessments on a rotating basis as determined by management. • Healthy RC Established to provide funding for the various programs and initiatives sponsored by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to promote healthy eating and active living within the City. Included in this reserve is funding for energy efficiency projects on City facilities Unassigned Fund Balance These are residual positive net resources of the General Fund and Fire District funds in excess of what can properly be classified in one of the other four categories. Fund Balance Classification The accounting policies of the City/Fire District consider restricted fund balance to have been spent first when an expenditure is incurred for purposes for which both restricted and unrestricted fund balance is available. Similarly, when an expenditure is incurred for purposes for which amounts in any of the unrestricted classifications of fund balance could be used, the City/Fire District considers committed amounts to be reduced first, followed by assigned amounts and then unassigned amounts. This policy is in place to provide a measure of protection for the City/Fire District against unforeseen circumstances and to comply with GASB Statement No. 54. No other policy or procedure supersedes the authority and provisions of this policy. P25 RESOLUTION NO. 14-103 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA COMMITTING TO THE LEVEL OF FISCAL RESERVES FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council desires to protect existing services, and; WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council desires to be prepared for emergencies, and; WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council desires to maintain good fiscal management and fiscal structure to operate a municipal corporation, and; WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council desires to maintain the financial strength required to obtain beneficial bond ratings for the City; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does hereby resolve on this 26th day of June 2014 that the level of fiscal reserves maintained by the City of Rancho Cucamonga as of fiscal year end are committed to the goals as outlined in the City's Fund Balance Policy, attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 26th day of June 2014. AYES:• NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P26 Resolution No. 14-103 • Page 2 I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at an adjourned meeting of said City Council held on the 26th day of June 2014. Executed this day of June 2014, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk • • i:Ifinancelbudget20151City Council staff reportslresolution committing to level of fiscal reserves-City 14-15.doc P27 STAFF REPORT �`y'`'' y ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT L�1410/ Date: June 26, 2014 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Jerry Dyer, Principal Civil Engineer Theresa Gates, Management Aide Subject: Approval of Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Fiscal Year 2014/2015 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the FY 2014/2015 Capital Improvement Program. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Attached for your approval is the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Fiscal Year 2014/2015. The CIP consists of a multi-year plan for citywide infrastructural improvements. Each year, the City budgets for"funded" projects which will occur during said fiscal year. The CIP is a vital piece of the City's Annual Operating Budget as it dictates major capital expenditures committed in any given year. The list of projects contained in the CIP addresses both the City's long-term and short-term capital needs. It identifies projects that reflect the desires of the community, as well as projects that serve operational and maintenance needs. The City's Engineering Services staff works with all Departments within the City to develop and implement an economically feasible CIP that embodies the City's public infrastructure needs. The CIP is the product of a wealth of planning and conceptual design taken from the City's General Plan, local residents, the business community, local development community, and external government agencies. The projects have been categorized by type of project (Beautification, Drainage, Facilities, etc.), and are in alphabetical order within each category. The individual project sheets include a short summary, cost, year funded, and a map showing the project location. Projects are funded from a variety of sources including Development Impact Fees, state pass-thru monies such as Measure "I" and Gas Tax, miscellaneous grants, enterprise funds and City reserves. This year's budgeted projects total just under$11,000,000 and will fund 57 projects citywide. The FY 2014/2015 Capital Improvement Program was also reviewed by the Planning Commission on May 28, 2014. At that meeting, the Commission made a finding that the CIP is in conformance with the City's General Plan. Respectfull submitted, _,X) .., -r—C....,, cy er Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Attachments: Fiscal Year 2014/2015 Capital Improvement Program (distributed under separate cover) P28 STAFF REPORT *is* ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT L RANCHO Date: June 13, 2013 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council From: John R. Gillison, City Manager By: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Subject: APPROVAL OF UPDATED CITY GENERAL FUND RESERVE FUNDING GOALS POLICY RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached updated City General Fund Reserve Funding Goals Policy. BACKGROUND This City General Fund Reserve Funding Goals Policy establishes the methodology for the funding goals for each of the City General Fund reserves, including the replacement of vehicles, equipment, and computer equipment/technology. While the City established many of these reserves in prior years, some did not have specific methodologies assigned to them in order to quantify the goal for the reserve. This policy, which was initially approved by the City Council in the prior year, formalizes the City General Fund reserves, establishes some new ones (if applicable), and sets quantifiable goals for each reserve. The following updates were made to the policy: The"Sphere of Influence analysis" reserve was renamed as the"Sphere of Influence issues" reserve. The funding goal was increased from $3,000,000 to $5,000,000 to allow for ancillary costs related to annexation of the sphere area, including mitigation issues and legal challenges. The "Multi-species habitat conservation plan" reserve was renamed as the "Multi-species habitat conservation" reserve. The funding goal was increased from $1,500,000 to $3,500,000 to provide funding to acquire mitigation habitat for endangered or threatened species in the City to preserve existing habitat or allow critical infrastructure to be improved by acquiring offsetting mitigation land. In accordance with the policy, upon the completion of the City's annual audit, the Finance Director prepares a schedule summarizing the funding status of each reserve for use by the City Manager in future budgetary planning. This policy does not apply to reserves determined to be nonspendable in accordance with the City's Fund Balance Policy nor does it apply to reserves that pertain to outstanding encumbrances (i.e., purchase orders) or unrealized gain on investments (GASB31) as of fiscal year end. 1.\finanre\budget2015\City Council staff reports\Gen'(Fund reserve fundinggoah polity 06-2014.dor P29 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 4.4 _ CITY GENERAL FUND RANCHO RESERVE FUNDING GOALS CUCAMONGA POLICY POLICY NO.: PAGE 1 OF 4 EFFECTIVE: June 13,2013 REVISED: June 26,2014 APPROVED: PURPOSE This City General Fund Reserve Funding Goals Policy establishes the methodology for the funding goals for each of the City General Fund reserves, including the replacement of vehicles,equipment, and computer equipment/technology. This policy does not apply to reserves determined to be nonspendable in accordance with the City's Fund Balance Policy nor does it apply to reserves that pertain to outstanding encumbrances (i.e., purchase orders) or unrealized gain on investments (GASB31)as of fiscal year end. Upon the completion of the City's annual audit,this policy directs the Finance Director to prepare a schedule summarizing the funding status of each reserve as of the audit date. This schedule will serve as a tool for budgetary planning for the funding of each reserve. GENERAL POLICY Following is a detailed description of the methodology for the funding goals for each of the City General Fund reserves referred to above. Self-insurance The minimum insurance reserve in the past has been three times the annual Self Insured Retention (SIR) in each program (Worker's Compensation, General Liability and Employment Practices Liability). The SIR is essentially the City's deductible in each program. The reserve goal is now established at five times the SIR to allow for five full limit claims in any one year. Those numbers are calculated as follows: Worker's Comp ($250,000 SIR) is $1,250,000. General Liability ($500,000 SIR) is $2,500,000. Employment Practices ($250,000 SIR) is $1,250,000. The total proposed reserve is $5,000,000. This level of reserves protects the City's assets by ensuring adequate funding in the event of multiple large claims against the City. P3O City General Fund Reserve Funding Goals Policy Page 2 of 4 Employee leave payouts The funding goal for this reserve is established at 100% of the current value of vacation, sick leave and comp time payouts per the respective City MOUs. Additionally, included in this funding goal is the value of the three years of furloughs for City employees. Information technology The funding goal for this reserve is based on the City's Cost Allocation Plan (CAP). The CAP allocates the proportionate share of the City's central services departments that pertain to efforts in support of the City's land management software. The CAP includes costs associated with Information Services staff time, maintenance contracts, and general administrative allocations. The funding goal is equal to two year's worth of CAP allocations. The source for this reserve is 6.67%of all building permit fees and building inspection fees collected during the fiscal year, also referred to as the Information Technology Fee. Booking fees The funding goal for this reserve is equal to the value of 18 months of booking fees that could be charged by the County of San Bernardino in the event that backfill funding is not provided by the State of California. The funding goal is calculated using the most recent annual report from the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department to determine the number of bookings multiplied by the most recent estimated booking fee approved by the County of San Bernardino. City facilities capital repairs • The funding goal for City facilities capital repair is established at a minimum goal of 25% of capital assets value comprised of construction in progress (excluding infrastructure), building improvements, and improvements other than buildings for governmental activities. Changes in economic circumstances The funding goal for changes in economic circumstances is established at a six month reserve, or 50% of the City General Fund operating budget for the upcoming fiscal year. Law enforcement The funding goal for this reserve is the equivalent of 50% of the most recently approved Schedule A from the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department. Economic and community development special services The funding goal for this reserve is $4,500,000 to pay for contract services associated with Economic and Community Development (ECD) special projects or ECD initiatives/Council goals (such as upcoming economic strategy and Development Code contract services) as well as a one P31 City General Fund Reserve Funding Goals Policy Page 3 of 4 year value of staffing costs for Planning, Building and Safety and Engineering (not including capital and project management). Funding for this reserve would be provided by unspent revenue from Planning, Building and Safety, and Engineering (not including capital and project management) on an annual basis. Sphere of Influence issues The funding goal for this reserve is established at $5,000,000. The reserve is intended to provide funds for a multi-year effort to analyze the physical constraints and opportunities within the sphere area, provide required environmental analysis, and plan for the eventual annexation of the remaining unincorporated areas within the City sphere of influence. The eventual annexation requires pre-zoning, CEQA compliance, and a comprehensive service plan. The reserve amount reflects estimates of cost proposed by the City staff in consultation with experts familiar with the City process and geography. This reserve also provides for ancillary costs related to annexation of the sphere area, including mitigation issues and legal challenges. Multi-species habitat conservation A funding goal of $3,500,000 is established to support the creation of a multi-species habitat conservation plan as well as acquisition of habitat conservation land. This consultant-prepared plan would provide the necessary support for identifying and preserving adequate wildlife habitat to support State and Federal regulatory requirements. These plans typically provide a comprehensive approach to habitat preservation, and facilitate development of property not included as mitigation lands both within the designated limits of the City, and its sphere of influence. As needed, the reserve would also be used to acquire mitigation habitat for endangered or threatened species in the City to preserve existing habitat or allow critical infrastructure to be improved by acquiring offsetting mitigation land. Working capital The funding goal for the City's General Fund working capital reserve is established at a goal of a minimum of 5% of the City's General Fund operating budget for the upcoming fiscal year. Animal Center operations The funding goal for this reserve is 6 months' expenditures for operations, excluding capital expenditures and fund-raising/special events for the upcoming fiscal year. General Plan update The funding goal is equal to the cost to update the City's General Plan based on the most recent contract awarded. The source for this reserve is 1.3% of all building permit fees and building inspection fees collected during the fiscal year, also referred to as the General Plan Update Fee. P32 City General Fund Reserve Funding Goals Policy Page 4 of 4 City infrastructure The funding goal for City infrastructure is established at a minimum goal of 25% of infrastructure assets value comprised of road system (excluding right of way), storm drain system, off-road trails system, and fiber optic lines for governmental activities. Radio system acquisition This reserve is established to fund the future acquisition or replacement of the City's 800 MHz radios, as well as the City's proportionate share of the Countywide radio infrastructure. The funding goal is established at 100% of the replacement cost of the radios and 100% of the proportionate cost of the Countywide radio infrastructure. Mobile Home Park Program The Building and Safety Department is responsible for enforcing the State mobilehome laws and has adopted the State's related schedule of fees. One of the fees collected is retained by the City to cover the cost of mandatory inspections performed by the Building and Safety Department in accordance with Title 25. The fee also covers the cost of educational materials and related printing services. The funding goal for this reserve is equal to the cost of a contract inspector for the mobilehome park inspections for eight parks within the City. Vehicle and equipment replacement The funding goal is established at 105% of capital assets value comprised of vehicles and equipment for governmental activities. Computer equipment/technology replacement The funding goal is established at 105% of capital assets value comprised of computer equipment/technology for governmental activities. Technology fee The funding goal of this reserve is equal to the implementation costs to replace and/or upgrade the City's land management software (Accela). The funding source for this reserve is a flat 4.5% technology charge on all permits and inspections. P33 v�' STAFF REPORT K y' ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES GROUP LJ RANCHO Date: June 26, 2014 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services By: Robert Neiuber, Human Resources DirectorWV Subject: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING SALARY SCHEDULES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014-15, INCLUDING A PART-TIME EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt the attached resolution approving the Fiscal Year 2014-15 salary schedules for job classifications employed by the City including a part-time employee benefit summary. BACKGROUND The City Council traditionally adopts salary resolutions biannually for those classifications employed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. These resolutions are updated to reflect changes in salaries, additions and deletions of classifications, changes in job titles and other terms of employment. Full-time salaries remain unchanged except as follows: • The addition of new class titles included in the proposed Fiscal Year 2014-15 budget. • A 4% adjustment to the Fleet Supervisor merit based salary range so that it comparable to the Maintenance Supervisors merit based salary range. All other salaries remain the same. • A ten percent (10%) Land Surveyor Certification Pay stipend for a designated employee required to maintain a current California Land Surveyor License for the purpose of signing City documents. The resolution also adopts the following: • The July 1, 2014, salary schedules for Executive employees, Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association covered employees in the Mid-Management, Supervisory/Professional and General Employees bargaining units, San Bernardino Public Employees Association covered employees, and part-time employees. • The lower end of the hourly salary ranges that were below the July 1, 2014, California minimum wage minimum of $9.00 per hour were raised to $9.03 so that the City is in compliance with the law. P34 APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ADOPT ING SALARY SCHEDULES FOR FISCAL YEAR PAGE 2 2014-15,INCLUDING A PART-TIME EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SUMMARY JUNE 26,2014 • A part-time employee benefit summary that also provides the basis for the work life balance part-time positions envisioned in the proposed Fiscal Year 2014-15 Budget. Attachment 1. Resolution 14-104 2. Salary Schedule for Executive Management Employee Job Classifications 3. Salary Schedule for Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association Covered Job Classifications made up of position in the Mid-Manager, Supervisory/Professional and General Employees Groups 4. Salary Schedule for San Bernardino Public Employees Association Job Classifications 5. Salary Schedule for Part-Time City Job Classifications 6. Part-Time Employee Benefit Summary P35 RESOLUTION NO. 14-104 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SALARY SCHEDULES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014-15, INCLUDING A PART-TIME EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SUMMARY AND CITY COUNCIL BENEFITS. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined that it is necessary for the efficient operation and management of the City that policies be established prescribing salary ranges, benefits and holidays and other policies for employees of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has previously adopted salary resolutions establishing salary ranges, benefits and other terms of employment for employees of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes that it is necessary from time to time to amend the salary resolution to accommodate changes in position titles, classifications salary ranges, benefits and other terms of employment including an outline of State and Federally required benefits afforded to part-time employees; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California to approve the salary schedules (Attachments 1-4); approve the part-time benefit summary (Attachment 5); approve a 10% stipend for an employee required to maintain a valid California Land Surveyor license and sign City documents as the Professional Land Surveyor; and permit the City Council to enroll in the California Public Employees Retirement System, the PARS Supplemental Retirement Plan, participate in the Executive Management Executive Wellness Plan, and provide a monthly mileage allowance in the amount of two hundred dollars. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 26th day of June, 2014. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: P36 Janice Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a Meeting of said Council on the 26th day of June, 2014. Executed this 26th day of June, 2014 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice Reynolds, City Clerk P37 Resolution # 14-104 EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES Monthly Pay Ranges effective July 1, 2014 Minimum Control Point Maximum Class Title Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Animal Services Director 1562 $7.310 1602 $8,924 1632 $10,364 Assistant City Clerk/ Records Mgr. 1514 $5,754 1554 $7,024 1584 $8,158 Assistant City Manager 1637 $10,626 1677 $12,972 1707 $15,066 Building and Safety Services Director 1577 $7.878 1617 $9,617 1647 $11,169 City Manager 1734 S17,238 1774 $21,044 1804 $24,440 Community Services Director 1595 S8,618 1635 $10,521 1665 $12,219 Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services 1615 S9,522 1655 $11,624 1685 $13,500 Deputy City Manager/ Econ. & Comm. Dev. 1615 $9,522 1655 $11,624 1685 $13,500 Eng Sys Director/City Engineer 1596 $8,661 1636 $10,573 1666 $12,280 Finance Director 1597 $8,704 1637 $10,626 1667 $12,341 Human Resources Director 1589 $8.364 1629 $10,210 1659 $11.858 Library Director 1579 $7,957 1619 $9.714 1649 $11,281 Planning Director 1589 $8,364 1629 $10.210 1659 $11,858 Public Works Services Director 1577 $7.878 1617 $9.617 1647 $11,169 Fire Chief* A $11.950 G S16,015 Included for informational purposes only-This is a Fire District Management Employee Group position not a City position Executive Management June 26, 2014 P38 Resolution No. 14-104 RCCEA COVERED EMPLOYEES IN THE MID MANAGER, SUPERVISORY/PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL EMPLOYEES GROUPS ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES Monthly Pay Ranges effective July 1, 2014 Minimum Control Point Maximum Class Title Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Account Clerk 4375 $2,850 4415 $3,480 4425 $3,658 Account Technician 4423 $3,621 4463 $4,421 4473 $4,647 Accountant# 3465 $4,462 3505 $5,448 3515 $5,726 Accounting Manager* 2525 $6,019 2565 $7,348 2575 $7,724 Administrative Secretary' 4424 $3,640 4464 $4,443 4474 $4,670 Administrative Technician 4437 $3,883 4477 $4,741 4487 $4,983 Animal Care Attendant 4349 $2,504 4389 $3,057 4399 $3,213 Animal Caretaker 4378 $2.893 4418 $3,532 4428 $3.713 Animal Care Supervisor# 3416 $3,495 3456 $4,267 3466 $4,485 Animal Center Manager* 2506 $5,475 2546 $6,684 2556 $7,026 Animal Handler 4388 $3,041 4428 $3,713 4438 $3,903 Animal License Canvasser 4349 $2,504 4389 $3,057 4399 $3,213 Animal Services Dispatcher 4369 $2,766 4409 $3,377 4419 $3,550 Animal Services Officer 4441 $3,962 4481 54,836 4491 $5,084 Assistant City Clerk# 3480 $4,809 3520 $5.871 3530 $6,171 Assistant City Engineer* 2590 $8.324 2630 $10,162 2640 $10,682 Assistant Engineer# 3488 $5,005 3528 $6,110 3538 $6.422 Assistant Library Director* 2572 $7,610 2612 $9,290 2622 $9,765 Assistant Planner# 3468 $4,530 3508 $5,530 3518 $5,813 Assistant to the City Manager* 2548 $6,751 2588 $8,242 2598 $8,663 Associate Engineer# 3518 $5,813 3558 $7,096 3568 $7,459 Associate Planner# 3487 $4,980 3527 $6,079 3537 $6,390 Box Office Coordinator 4450 $4,143 4490 $5.058 4500 $5,317 Budget Analyst# 3498 $5,261 3538 $6,422 3548 $6,751 Building Inspection Supervisor#2 3504 $5,421 3544 $6,617 3554 $6,956 Building Inspector2 4464 $4,443 4504 $5,424 4514 $5,702 Building Safety Manager* 2533 $6,264 2573 $7,648 2583 $8,039 Business License Clerk 4378 $2,893 4418 $3.532 4428 $3,713 Business License Inspector 4418 $3,532 4458 $4,312 4468 $4,533 Business License Program Coordinator# 3432 $3,785 3472 $4,621 3482 $4.857 Business License Technician 4408 $3,360 4448 $4,102 4458 $4.312 Buyer I 4411 $3,411 4451 $4,164 4461 $4,377 Buyer II # 3433 $3,804 3473 $4,644 3483 $4,882 Code Enforcement Officer 4441 $3,962 4481 $4,836 4491 $5,084 Code Enforcement Supervisor#2 3481 $4.833 3521 $5,900 3531 $6,202 Mid Manager, Supervisory/Professional, and General Employees Groups June 26, 2014 P39 Communications Manager* 2565 $7,348 2605 $8,971 2615 $9.429 Community Programs Coordinator 4450 $4,143 4490 $5,058 4500 $5.317 Community Programs Specialist 4437 $3,883 4477 $4,741 4487 $4,983 Community Services Coordinator 4450 y $4,143 4490 $5,058 4500 $5,317 Community Services Marketing Coord 4450 $4,143 4490 $5,058 4500 $5,317 Community Services Project Coordinator# 3500 $5,313 3540 $6,487 3550 $6,818 Community Services Specialist 4350 $2,516 4390 $3,072 4400 $3,229 Community Services Superintendent* 2536 $6,359 2576 $7,763 2586 $8,160 Community Services Supervisor# 3480 $4,809 3520 $5,871 3530 $6,171 Community Services Technician 4437 $3,883 4477 $4,741 4487 $4,983 Community Services Manager* 2506 $5,475 2546 $6,684 2556 $7,026 Community Svc Marketing Manager* 2536 $6,359 2576 $7,763 2586 $8,160 Cultural Arts Manager* 2506 $5,475 2546 $6,684 2556 $7,026 Deputy City Clerk# 3430 $3,748 3470 $4,575 3480 $4,809 Engineering Aide 4421 $3,585 4461 $4,377 4471 $4,601 Engineering Technician 4441 $3,962 4481 $4,836 4491 $5,084 Environmental Programs Coordinator# 3503 $5,394 3543 $6,584 3553 $6,921 Environmental Programs Inspector2 4464 $4,443 4504 $5,424 4514 $5,702 Environmental Programs Manager* 2539 $6,455 2579 $7,880 2589 $8,283 Executive Assistant* 2460 $4,353 2500 $5,314 2510 $5,585 Facilities Superintendent* 2536 $6,359 2576 $7,763 2586 $8,160 Fleet Supervisor#2 3488 $5,005 3528 $6,110 3538 $6,422 GIS Analyst 4456 $4,269 4496 $5,212 4506 $5,479 GIS Technician 4436 $3,864 4476 $4,717 4486 $4,958 GIS/Special District Manager* 2538 $6,423 2578 $7,841 2588 $8,242 Human Resources Manager* 2583 $8,039 2623 $9,814 2633 $10,315 Human Resources Technician 4399 $3,213 4439 $3,922 4449 $4,123 Information Services Analyst l# 3505 $5,448 3545 $6,650 3555 $6,991 Information Services Analyst II# 3520 $5,871 3560 $7,167 3570 $7,534 Information Services Manager* 2584 $8,079 2624 $9,863 2634 $10,367 Information Services Projects Coord.# 3508 $5,530 3548 $6,751 3558 $7,096 Information Services Specialist I 4456 $4.269 4496 $5,212 4506 $5,479 Information Services Specialist II 4471 $4,601 4511 $5,617 4521 $5,904 Librarian I# 3435 $3,842 3475 $4,691 3485 $4,930 Librarian II# 3457 $4,288 3497 $5,235 3507 $5,502 Library Assistant l# 3373 $2,820 3413 $3,443 3423 $3,619 Library Assistant II# 3414 $3,460 3454 $4,224 3464 $4,440 Library Clerk 4356 $2,593 4396 $3.165 4406 $3,327 Library Page 4244 $1,483 4284 $1.810 4294 $1,903 Library Page II 4293 $1,894 4333 $2.312 4343 $2,430 Library Services Manager* 2506 $5,475 2546 $6,684 2556 $7,026 Library Technician 4393 $3,116 4433 $3,804 4443 $3,999 Maintenance Supervisor#2 3488 $5.005 3528 $6,110 3538 $6,422 Mid Manager, Supervisory/Professional, and General Employees Groups June 26, 2014 P40 Management Aide 4440 $3,942 4480 $4,812 4490 $5.058 Manageflie�'It Analyst 110 3470 $4,575 3510 $5.585 3520 $5,871 MantiOitikirt Analyst II# 3498 $5,261 3538 $6,422 3548 $6,751 Management Analyst III# 3515 $5,726 3555 $6,991 3565 $7.348 Office Services Clerk 4369 $2,766 4409 $3,377 4419 $3,550 Office Specialist I 4349 $2,504 4389 $3,057 4399 $3,213 Office Specialist II 4369 $2,766 4409 $3,377 4419 $3,550 Park/Landscape Maintenance Supt*2 2536 $6,359 2576 $7,763 2586 $8,160 Payroll Supervisor# 3470 $4,575 3510 $5,585 3520 $5,871 Plan Check & Inspection Manager* 2533 $6,264 2573 $7,648 2583 $8,039 Planning Commission Secretary# 3444 $4,019 3484 $4,906 3494 $5,157 Planning Manager* 2583 $8,039 2623 $9,814 2633 $10,315 Planning Specialist 4443 $4,001 4483 $4,885 4493 $5,135 Planning Technician 4423 $3,621 4463 $4,421 4473 $4,647 Plans Examiner# 3482 $4,857 3522 $5,930 3532 $6,233 Principal Librarian* 2495 $5,183 2535 $6,327 2545 $6,651 Principal Management Analyst* 2543 $6,585 2583 $8,039 2593 $8,450 Principal Engineer* 2567 $7,422 2607 $9,061 2617 $9,524 Principal Planner* 2537 $6,391 2577 $7,802 2587 $8,201 Public Services Technician I 4413 $3,445 4453 $4,206 4463 $4,421 Public Services Technician II 4423 $3,621 4463 $4,421 4473 $4,647 Public Services Technician III 4443 $4,001 4483 $4,885 4493 $5,135 Public Works Inspector 12 4444 $4,021 4484 $4,909 4494 $5,160 Public Works Inspector 112 4464 $4,443 4504 $5,424 4514 $5,702 Public Works Maintenance Manager* 2566 $7,385 2606 $9,016 2616 $9,477 Public Works Safety Coordinator#2 3468 $4,530 3508 $5,530 3518 $5,813 Purchasing Clerk 4374 $2,836 4414 $3,462 4424 $3,640 Purchasing Manager* 2530 $6,171 2570 $7,534 2580 $7,919 Records Clerk 4358 $2,619 4398 $3,197 4408 $3,360 Records Coordinator 4386 $3,011 4426 $3,676 4436 $3,864 Risk Management Coordinator# 3470 $4,575 3510 $5,585 3520 $5,871 Secretary' 4394 $3,134 4434 $3,826 4444 $4,021 Senior Account Clerk 4395 $3.149 4435 $3,845 4445 $4,041 Senior Account Technician 4446 $4,062 4486 $4,958 4496 $5,212 Senior Accountant# 3498 $5,261 3538 $6,422 3548 $6,751 Senior Administrative Secretary' 4444 $4,021 4484 $4,909 4494 $5,160 Senior Animal Services Officer# 3461 $4,374 3501 $5,340 3511 $5,613 Senior Building Inspector#2 3484 $4,906 3524 $5,989 3534 $6.295 Senior Buyer# 3463 $4,418 3503 $5,394 3513 $5,669 Senior Civil Engineer* 2547 $6,717 2587 $8,201 2597 $8,620 Senior Code Enforcement Officer# 3461 $4.374 3501 $5,340 3511 $5,613 Senior Electrician # 3485 $4,930 3525 $6,019 3535 $6,327 Senior GIS Analyst # 3484 $4,906 3524 $5,989 3534 $6,295 Mid Manager, Supervisory/Professional, and General Employees Groups June 26, 2014 P41 Senior Information Services Analyst# 3535 $6.327 3575 $7.724 3585 38,119 Senior Information Services Specialist 4493 $5,135 4533 $6.268 4543 $6.589 Senior Librarian# 3468 $4,530 3508 $5.530 3518 $5.813 Senior Park Planner# 3500 $5.313 3540 $6,487 3550 $6.818 Senior Planner* 2517 $5.784 2557 $7,061 2567 $7.422 Senior Plans Examiner# 3497 $5.235 3537 $6,390 3547 $6.717 Senior Special Districts Technician 4443 $4,001 4483 $4,885 4493 $5.135 Special Districts Analyst# 3498 $5,261 3538 $6,422 3548 $6,751 Special Districts Technician 4437 $3,883 4477 $4,741 4487 $4,983 Street/Storm Drain Maintenance Supt*2 2536 $6,359 2576 $7.763 2586 $8,160 Supervising Public Works Inspector#2 3494 $5,157 3534 $6,295 3544 $6,617 Theater Production Coordinator 4460 $4.355 4500 $5.317 4510 35.589 Theater Production Supervisor# 3480 $4.809 3520 $5,871 3530 $6.171 Theatre Technician III 4423 $3,621 4463 $4.421 4473 34.647 Traffic Engineer* 2569 $7,496 2609 39.152 2619 39.620 Utilities Division Manager* 2584 $8,079 2624 $9,863 2634 310,367 Utility Operations Manager* 2524 $5,989 2564 $7,312 2574 37.686 Veterinarian* 2579 $7,880 2619 $9,620 2629 310.112 Veterinary Assistant 4407 $3,344 4447 $4,082 4457 34,291 Veterinary Technician 4437 $3,883 4477 $4,741 4487 $4,983 When acting as Clerk to Commissions $50 paid per night or weekend day meeting. Compensatory time off can be substituted in lieu of$50 at the option of the employee. 2 Refer to MOU for provision of boot allowance. # Denotes Supervisory/Professional Class Denotes Management Class Mid Manager. Supervisory/Professional, and General Employees Groups June 26. 2014 P42 Resolution No. 14-104 PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE EMPLOYEES Represented By SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (SBPEA) ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES Monthly Pay Ranges Effective July 1, 2014 Minimum Control Point Maximum Class Title Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Electrician 5457 $4,287 5497 $5.234 5507 $5,502 Equipment Operator 5425 $3,655 5465 $4,462 5475 $4,690 Inventory Specialist Equipment/Mat 5389 $3,054 5429 $3,729 5439 $3,919 Lead Maintenance Worker 5429 $3,729 5469 $4,552 5479 $4,785 Lead Mechanic 5440 $3,939 5480 $4,808 5490 $5.054 Maintenance Coordinator 5452 $4,182 5492 $5,105 5502 $5.366 Maintenance Worker 5391 $3,085 5431 $3,766 5441 $3.958 Mechanic 5430 $3,747 5470 $4,574 5480 $4,808 Senior Maintenance Worker 5401 $3.243 5441 $3,958 5451 $4,161 Signal & Lighting Coordinator 5479 $4,785 5519 $5,841 5529 $6,140 Signal & Lighting Technician 5452 $4,182 5492 $5,105 5502 $5,366 Public Works Maintenance Employees June 26, 2014 P43 Resolution No. 14-104 PART-TIME CITY POSITIONS ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES Hourly Pay RangeS Effective July 1, 2014 Minimum Control Point Maximum Part Time Positions Sten Amount Stet) Amount Sten Amount Account Clerk 6368 $15.87 6408 $19.37 6418 $20.36 Account Technician 6423 $20.88 6463 $25.49 6473 $26.79 Accountant 6465 , $25.75 6505 $31.43 6515 $33.04 Administrative Intern 6320 $12.48 6360 $15.24 6370 $16.03 Animal Care Attendant 6349 $14.43 6389 $17.62 6399 $18.52 Animal Caretaker 6378 $16.69 6418 $20.38 6428 $21.42 Animal Handler 6388 $17.54 6428 $21.41 6438 $22.50 Animal License Canvasser 6266 $9.54 6306 $11.65 6316 $12.26 Animal Services Dispatcher 6369 $15.95 6409 $19.47 6419 $20.46 Animal Services Officer 6441 $22.84 6481 $27.88 6491 $29.31 Assistant Engineer 6488 $28.88 6528 $35.25 6538 , $37.05 Assistant Planner 6468 $26.13 6508 $31.90 6518 $33.54 Assistant Pool Manager 6305 $11.60 6345 $14.16 6355 , $14.87 Associate Engineer 6518 $33.53 6558 $40.94 6568 $43.03 Associate Planner 6487 $28.73 6527 $35.07 6537 $36.86 Box Office Assistant 6290 $10.76 6330 $13.13 6340 $13.81 Box Office Specialist 6311 $11.95 6351 $14.58 6361 $15.33 Budget Analyst 6498 $30.35 6538 $37.05 6548 $38.95 Building Inspector 6464 $25.61 6504 $31.27 6514 $32.87 Business License Clerk 6378 $16.69 6418 $20.38 6428 $21.42 Code Enforcement Officer 6441 $22.84 6481 $27.88 6491 $29.31 Community Programs Coordinator 6450 $23.89 6490 $29.16 6500 $30.66 Community Programs Specialist 6437 $22.39 6477 $27.33 6487 $28.73 Community Services Coordinator 6450 $23.89 6490 $29.16 6500 $30.66 Community Services Specialist 6350 $14.51 6390 $17.71 6400 $18.62 Community Services Supervisor 6480 $27.75 6520 $33.87 6530 $35.60 Community Services Technician 6437 $22.39 6477 $27.33 6487 $28.73 Department Director 6562 $42.17 6604 $51.50 6707 $86.92 Department Manager 6525 $34.73 6566 $42.60 6634 $59.81 Deputy City Clerk 6430 $21.62 6470 $26.40 6480 $27.75 Division Supervisor 6416 $20.16 6457 $24.74 6554 $40.13 Electrician 6457 $24.74 6497 $30.20 6507 $31.75 Energy Efficiency Coordinator 6372 $16.19 6412 $19.77 6422 $20.78 Engineering Aide 6421 $20.67 6461 $25.24 6471 $26.53 Engineering Technician 6441 $22.84 6481 $27.88 6491 $29.31 Environmental Resources Intern 6280 $10.23 6320 $12.48 6330 $13.13 Equipment Operator 6425 $21.09 6465 $25.75 6475 $27.06 GIS Programmer/Analyst 6456 $24.61 6496 $30.05 6506 $31.58 GIS Intern 6320 $12.48 6360 $15.24 6370 $16.03 GIS Technician 6436 $22.28 6476 $27.20 6486 $28.59 Healthy Cities Coordinator 6372 $16.19 6412 $19.77 6422 $20.78 Human Resources Technician 6399 $18.52 6439 $22.61 6449 $23.77 Instructor/Guard I 6255 $9.03 _ 6280 . $10.23 6290 $10.76 City Part-Time Hourly Pay Ranges June 26, 2014 P44 Instructor/Guard II 6280 $10.23 6320 $12.48 6330 $13.13 Lead Mechanic 6440 $22.73 6480 $27.75 6490 $29.16 Library Aide 6255 $9.03 6277 $10.09 6287 $10.59 Librarian I 6433 $21.95 6473 $26.79 6483 $28.16 Library Assistant I 6362 $15.41 6402 $18.81 6412 $19.77 Library Assistant II 6404 $18.99 6444 $23.20 6454 $24.37 Library Clerk 6346 $14.22 6386 $17.37 6396 $18.25 Library Page 6255 $9.03 6277 $10.09 6287 $10.59 _ Library Page II 6280 $10.23 , 6320 . $12.48 6330 $13.13 Library Technician 6393 $17.98 6433 $21.95 6443 $23.07 Maintenance Technician 6280 $10.23 6320 $12.48 6330 $13.13 Management Aide 6440 $22.73 6480 $27.75 6490 $29.16 Management Analyst I 6470 $26.40 6510 $32.22 6520 $33.87 Management Analyst II 6498 $30.35 6538 $37.05 6548 $38.95 Mechanic 6430 $21.62 6470 $26.40 6480 $27.75 Office Services Clerk 6369 $15.95 6409 $19.41 6419 $20.47 Office Specialist I 6332 $13.25 6372 $16.19 6382 $17.02 Office Specialist II 6352 $14.65 6392 $17.89 6402 $18.80 Outreach Technician 6311 $11.95 6351 $14.58 6361 $15.33 Park Ranger 6352 $14.65 6392 $17.89 6402 $18.80 Planning Aide 6320 $12.48 6360 $15.24 6370 $16.03 Planning Manager 6583 $46.37 , 6623 $56.62 6633 $59.51 Playschool Instructor 6311 $11.95 6351 $14.58 6361 $15.33 Pool Manager 6329 $13.07 6369 $15.95 6379 $16.76 Principal Engineer 6567 $42.82 6607 $52.77 6617 $54.95 Program Specialist 6311 $11.95 6351 $14.58 6361 $15.33 Public Services Technician I 6413 , $19.86 6453 $24.25 6463 $25.49 Public Services Technician II 6423 $20.88 6463 $25.49 6473 $26.79 Public Services Technician III 6443 $23.07 6483 $28.16 6493 $29.60 Public Works Inspector I 6444 $23.19 6484 $28.31 6494 $29.75 Public Works Inspector II 6464 $25.62 6504 $31.27 6514 $32.87 Purchasing Clerk 6368 $15.87 6408 $19.37 6418 $20.37 Receptionist 6342 $13.94 6382 $17.02 6392 $17.89 Records Clerk 6344 $14.08 6384 $17.19 6394 $18.08 Records Coordinator 6372 $16.19 6412 $19.77 6422 $20.78 Recreation Attendant 6255 $9.03 6277 $10.09 6287 $10.59 Recreation Assistant , 6266 $9.54 6306 $11.65 6316 $12.26 Recreation Leader 6290 $10.76 6330 $13.13 6340 $13.81 Secretary 6394 $18.07 6434 $22.06 6444 $23.18 Senior Accountant 6498 $30.35 6538 $37.05 6548 $38.95 Senior Civil Engineer 6543 $37.99 6583 $46.37 6593 $48.75 Signal and Lighting Technician 6452 $24.12 6492 $29.46 6502 . $30.96 Sports Official 6311 $11.95 6351 $14.58 6361 $15.33 Swim Aide 6266 $9.54 6306 $11.65 6316 $12.26 Theatre Technician I 6311 $11.95 6351 $14.58 6361 $15.33 Theatre Technician II 6372 $16.19 6412 $19.77 6422 $20.78 Veterinarian 6579 $45.46 6619 $55.50 6629 $58.33 Veterinary Assistant 6407 $19.27 6447 $23.52 6457 $24.74 Veterinary Technician 6437 $22.40 6477 $27.33 6487 $28.73 City Part-Time Hourly Pay Ranges June 26, 2014 P45 PART-TIME EMPLOYEE BENEFITS SUMMARY ADOPTED PER RESOLUTION NO. 14-104 JUNE 26, 2014 The following benefits are approved via resolution by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga effective the first full pay period in July 2014. All part-time employees are employed "at-will' and serve at the pleasure of the appointing authority. As such, their services can be discontinued without cause or right of appeal. Each Department determines the number of part-time employees required in order to meet their needs depending on their approved budget for part-time employees and the approval of the City Manager In general, part-time employees are only eligible for mandated State and Federal benefits except for specifically designated Work Life Balance Part-time employees as outlined below under the "Work-life Balance Section." Definition — PART-TIME EMPLOYEE: A person serving in a budgeted position of less than forty (40) hours per week on average over a year, and typically less than 1,040 hours per year as further defined under City of Rancho Cucamonga Personnel Rules and Regulations Rule XIV (Part-Time, Seasonal and Temporary Employees). Part-time employees are at-will and may be terminated without cause or right of appeal. Retirement Benefits — The City either provides access to retirement benefits through the Accumulation Program for Part-Time Limited-service Employees (APPLE) or the California Public Employees Retirement System (Ca1PERS) as outlined below. APPLE — Part-time employees who work less than 1,000 hours in a fiscal year, are not a current CaIPERS Member or who otherwise do not qualify for CaIPERS retirement benefits under State law or Ca1PERS regulations must contribute 7.5% of base pay to APPLE — a required alternative retirement system. Ca1PERS — Part-time employees who work 1,000 hours or more in a fiscal year, are hired to work more than 20 hours per week on average, are current Ca1PERS Members or who otherwise would qualify for Ca1PERS retirement benefits under State law or CaIPERS regulations must contribute the full employee member contribution towards their CaIPERS retirement benefits and "New Members" as defined by Ca1PERS must pay half the normal cost. The Ca1PERS retirement benefits available for qualifying part-time employees depend on the date the employee qualified for CaIPERS benefits. Tier 1 Part-time Employees who qualified for CaIPERS benefits before July 3, 2011 § 21354.4 2.5% at 55 Full Formula § 21574 4th Level 1959 Survivor § 20042 1 Year Final Compensation P46 PART-TIME EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SUMMARY Tier 2 Part-time Employees who qualified for Ca1PERS benefits on or after July 4, 2011 and before January 1, 2013 § 21354 2% @ 55 Full Formula § 21574 4th Level 1959 Survivor § 20037 3 Year Final Compensation Tier 3 Part-time Employees not considered "New Members" by CaIPERS who qualified for Ca1PERS benefits on or After January 1, 2013 § 21354 2% @ 55 Full Formula § 21574 4th Level 1959 Survivor § 20037 3 Year Final Compensation Tier 4 Part-time Employees meeting the CaIPERS definition of"New Members" who qualified for Ca1PERS benefits on or After January 1, 2013 § 7522.20 2% @ 62 Full Formula § 7522.32 36 Consecutive Months § 7522.10 Based on Pensionable Compensation Unit members hired on and after January 1, 2013, deemed to be a "new member" as defined in Government Code § 7522.04, shall individually pay an initial Member CALPERS contribution rate of 50% of the normal cost rate for the Defined Benefit Plan in which said "new member" is enrolled, rounded to the nearest quarter of 1%, or the current contribution rate of similarly situated employees, whichever is greater. This rate can increase based on Ca1PERS regulations. The City does not participate in Social Security except for the mandatory Medicare Program. Medical Insurance Benefits — The City provides access to medical insurance for part-time employees who qualify for the Affordable Care Act (ACA) under the City's policy. In general, employees who work 30 or more hours per week on average per year would qualify, but the City's policy and the federal law determine who specifically qualifies for these benefits. For those part- time employees who qualify for this benefit, the City contributes the cost of the lowest cost self only coverage minus 9.5% of the Federal Poverty Line towards the cost of medical insurance. For example: In 2014, the FPL was $972.50 per month, and 9.5% of that is 92.38/month. In 2014, the lowest cost self-only coverage cost was Blue Shield Silver — PPO costing $423.00 per month. Following the policy, the City would pay $330.62 towards any health care plan the ACA eligible part-time employee chooses and the employee would pay the difference, which for the lowest cost self-only coverage would be $92.38. Page 2 of 4 PART-TIME EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SUMMARY P47 WORK-LIFE BALANCE PART-TIME EMPLOYEES BENEFITS FOR SPECIFICALLY DESIGNATED POSITION Specifically designated Part-time employees in specific management, supervisory, professional and/or confidential type positions, as designated by the City Manager and noted on the Personnel Action Report, who are scheduled to work 32 hours per week on a year-round basis, are referred to as work-life balance part-time employees. The City Manager will review and if appropriate amend the list of designated work life balance employees at least once per year as part of his/her budget review process. Work-life balance part-time employees participate in the State and Federally required benefits as enumerated above and shall receive the following additional benefits: Medical Insurance: In accordance with the City's ACA policy, work-life balance part-time employees are eligible to participate in the City's medical plan. The City will pay the higher of the ACA policy contribution or 80% of the cost the City would pay for a full-time employee in the same position towards medical insurance premium costs. In 2013, the maximum the City would pay for medical insurance would be $700 for a full time employee hired after 1994, so following this policy a work-life balance part-time employee would receive $560 towards the cost of the medical coverage that they choose. Dental Insurance: City paid Vision: City Paid Life Insurance: City Paid $30,000 base coverage Vacation: Work-life balance part-time employees accrue vacation hours at 80% of the rate of full-time employees in the same position. Work-life balance part-time employees can accumulate vacation hours up to two times the highest annual accrual rate that full-time employees in the same position can earn. Once they reach their maximum accrual rate they stop earning vacation hours until they bring their vacation hours below the maximum accrual rate. Work-life balance employees may only cash out vacation hours upon separation from the City. Work-life balance part-time employees transitioning from a full-time position with the City of Rancho Cucamonga may either cash out their vacation per their MOU or carry over their accrued vacation balance to the work-life balance part-time position. Sick Leave: Work-life balance part-time employees accrue 8 hours of sick leave per month. No cash out or buyback of sick leave is provided to work-life balance part-time employees. Work- life balance part-time employees transitioning from a full-time position with the City of Rancho Cucamonga may either cash out their sick leave per their MOU or carry over their accrued sick leave balance to the work-life balance part-time position. Holidays: Work-life balance part-time employees will be compensated for normally scheduled working hours, when they fall on official City holidays. The City observes 11 holidays per year: Independence Day, Labor Day, Veteran's Day, Thanksgiving Day and the day following, Page 3 of 4 P48 PART-TIME EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SUMMARY Christmas Eve, Christmas Day, New Year's Day, Martin Luther King's Birthday, President's Day and Memorial Day. Deferred Compensation Plans: Work-life balance part-time employees are eligible to participate in the City's deferred compensation plans. The City does not contribute. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING ALL PART-TIME POSITIONS Medicare: Employees hired after 1/1/86, are required to contribute 1.45% of their earnings. All Part-Time employees are subject to specific provisions of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Personnel Rules and Regulations (Rule XIV) and specific provisions of the Policy and Procedures Manual (Policy 200-01) that apply to them. Page 4 of 4 P49 STAFF REPORT Lit ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES GROUP i RANCHO Date: June 26, 2014 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services By: Robert Neiuber, Human Resources Director te Subject: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION FOR THE PERIOD 2014-2017 RECOMMENDATION That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt the attached Resolution, approving the Memorandum of Understanding between the City and the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association (RCCEA) for the period July 1, 2014 through June 30, 2017. BACKGROUND Representatives of the City and RCCEA have met and conferred in good faith and reached an agreement for a three (3) year labor contract for the period July 1, 2014 through June 30, 2017. Employees in this group have had no wage or benefit adjustments since 2009. In 2011, the City implemented a series of pension reform measures to reduce retirement benefits for new employees and require employee contributions toward retirement costs. Subsequently, the State adopted the Public Employees Pension Reform Act of 2012, which created a still lower level of pension benefits for new employees hired after that date. This new MOU was developed in mutual recognition of the current economic conditions in the State of California, the on-going fiscal challenges facing all local agencies, and prudent public policy, while balancing the need to maintain competitive compensation levels. Highlights of the new agreement include an increased contribution of 4% by employees toward the cost of their CaIPERS retirement benefits, the opportunity for a total of 5% in merit-based wage increases during the 3-year term, additional contributions toward employee medical preimium costs and a one-time furlough equivalent payment for those employees who personally contributed to the 2010 to 2013 furloughs so that the City could continue to provide the same level of service to the community. The ongoing costs of the agreement are 2.25% of pay over the term of the MOU. Attachments 1. Resolution Approving 2014-2017 Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association 2. 2014-2017 Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association MOU P50 RESOLUTION NO. 14-107 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION RELATIVE TO WAGES, BENEFITS AND OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT FOR THE PERIOD JULY 1, 2014 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2017. A. RECITALS Representatives of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) and the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association have met and conferred pursuant to the provisions of the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (California Government Code §3500, et seq.) with regard to wages, benefits and other terms and conditions of employment. Representatives of the City and the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association have agreed upon and present to this Council a Memorandum of Understanding pertaining to the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association, effective July 1, 2014, specifying the results of said meet and confer process. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. RESOLUTION NOW THEREFORE, the City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does hereby find, determine and resolve as follows: 1. In all respects, as set forth in the Recitals, Part A of this Resolution. 2. The attached Memorandum of Understanding entered into by and between City representatives and the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association representatives for the period July 1, 2014 through June 30, 2017, effective July 1, 2014, is hereby approved and ratified by the City Council. 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 26th day of June, 2014. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor P51 ATTEST: Janice Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a Meeting of said Council on the 26th day of June, 2014. Executed this 26th day of June, 2014 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice Reynolds, City Clerk P52 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION REPRESENTINGTHE MID-MANAGER, SUPERVISORY/PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL EMPLOYEES BARGAINING UNITS 2014-2017 P53 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIAAND RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION(RCCEA) SECTION 1: EFFECTIVE DATE The provisions of this MOU are effective July 1, 2014 and shall continue for a three-year period, ending June 30, 2017. SECTION 2: COST OF LIVING ADJUSTMENT There shall be no cost of living adjustment (0%) for the term of this agreement. SECTION 3: SALARY STRUCTURE All employees will be assigned to salary ranges which are no less than 20% (40 salary code steps) below the control point and no more than 5% (10 salary code steps)above the control point, except as modified below in A and B. Actual salary within the range is determined by performance, achievement of goals and objectives, or for recent appointments, growth within the position. A. Effective the first full pay period in July 2015, the upper end of each salary range will be increased from 5% (10 salary code steps) above the control point to 7.5% (15 salary code steps) above the control point. This is a 2.5% increase in the available merit based salary ranges. Any individual who has been at the top step of their range for 365 days or more prior to July 1, 2015, shall be eligible for a 2.5% step increase effective the first full pay period in July 2015, if their last annual evaluation was"meets standards" or higher. All other individuals who have been at the top step of their range for fewer than 365 days prior to July 1, 2015, shall be eligible for a 2.5% increase to their current step effective with the first full pay period after their anniversary date, if their annual evaluation after July 1, 2015 is "meets standards" or higher. B. Effective the first full pay period in July 2016, the upper end of each salary range will be increased from 7.5% (15 salary code steps) above the control point to 10% (20 salary code steps) above the control point. This is a 2.5% increase in the available merit based salary ranges. Any individual who has been at the top step of their range for 365 days or more prior to July 1, 2016, shall be eligible for a 2.5% step increase effective the first full pay period in July 2016, if their last annual evaluation was"meets standards" or higher. All other individuals who have been at the top step of their range for fewer than 365 days prior to July 1, 2016, shall be eligible for a 2.5% increase to their current step effective with the first full pay period after their anniversary date, if their annual evaluation after July 1, 2016 is "meets standards" or higher. 1 P54 SECTION 4: SALARY SURVEY The City shall conduct a salary survey of labor market cities approximately six months before the start of new labor negotiations for the next MOU. SECTION 5: TWO-TIERED MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Employees designated as either Professional/Supervisory or Management are not eligible for overtime pay, or compensatory time for working hours over and above the normal daily work schedule. Employees so designated shall be entitled to all benefits provided to general employees and the following: Management A. Administrative Leave—Seventy Five(75) hours per fiscal year. Days off must be approved by appropriate supervisor, after successful completion of six months service within this classification. B. Life Insurance — Additional life insurance in the amount of $20,000 (total $50,000) C. Deferred Compensation — Four percent (4%) of base salary. Supervisory/Professional A. Administrative Leave — Fifty (50) hours per fiscal year. Days off must be approved by appropriate supervisor, and may be taken only after successful completion of six months service within this classification. B. Life Insurance —Additional life insurance in the amount of $20,000 (total $50,000). C. Deferred Compensation — Two percent (2%) of base salary. SECTION 6: LIFE INSURANCE The City provides $30,000 base coverage of life insurance for all employees. Employees who want to purchase additional life insurance coverage with personal funds may do so at the City's group rate. SECTION 7: HEALTH INSURANCE A. EMPLOYEES HIRED BEFORE JULY 1, 1994 The City shall provide employee and family health insurance for all existing full-time continuous salaried employees within the bargaining groups, subject to the limitation that no such monthly funding by the City shall exceed the following: $995.60 2 P55 B. EMPLOYEES HIRED AFTER JULY 1, 1994 The City shall provide employee and family health insurance for all full-time continuous employees within the bargaining groups who have been hired on or after July 1, 1994, subject to the limitation that no such monthly funding by the City shall exceed the following: $700 Effective with the July 24, 2014 paycheck, this amount will increase by$50 to a total of $750 per month. Effective with the first full pay period in July of 2015, this amount will increase by $50 to a total of$800 per month. Effective with the first full pay period in July of 2016, this amount will increase by $50 to a total of$850 per month. C. CASH IN-LIEU PAYMENT Represented employees who had waived coverage under a City-paid medical insurance plan, and were receiving a cash in-lieu payment in the amount of $200 per month for single coverage or $300 per month for family coverage as of September 30,.2012, may continue to receive this cash in-lieu payment as long as they remain eligible. To be eligible, an employee must provide proof of other medical insurance coverage and must have provided a signed waiver. Beginning October 1, 2012, and for the remaining term of this MOU, no other represented employees shall be eligible for this benefit. Employees not receiving cash in-lieu as of September 30, 2012, may still waive coverage by providing the proof of insurance and signed waiver as noted above, but will not receive a cash in- lieu payment. (10-17-12 Amendment) SECTION 8: RETIREE MEDICAL Subject to the conditions stated below, effective upon a service or disability retirement from City service at or beyond age 55 with 10 consecutive years of City service at the time of retirement, retirees shall be eligible to 100% personally fund, without any City contribution, participation in a group health insurance program(s) which is making group health insurance available to the City's retirees. It is agreed and acknowledged by the parties to this MOU that no representation is or can be made by the City, that such group retiree health insurance is available, or if available, will remain available for any specific future period of time. If no such group health insurance is reasonably available, or if the private carrier(s) terminates such coverage as to the retiree group or any individual group member, the City shall have no obligation/duty to self-fund or otherwise provide insurance or replacement 3 P56 insurance. All premiums for the retiree and/or eligible dependents shall be borne by the retiree. The City shall advance and submit the necessary premiums to the carrier(s), subject to the retiree reimbursing the City not later than 30 calendar days after City payment of the premium. Failure to timely reimburse the City shall result in no further premium payments being made by the City, resulting in termination of insurance coverage. The City's duty to advance said premiums shall terminate at age 65 of the retiree, regardless of whether or not the retiree is eligible for Medicare. City shall advise the group carrier of the insured's status as a retiree. Coverage eligibility shall then be solely determined by the group insurance carrier(s). It is likely that premium rates for retirees and/or dependents shall be greater than rates for employees. Regardless, retirees shall pay 100% of said rates. If at any time, it is determined by any group health insurance carrier that the City is prohibited from seeking premium reimbursement from a retiree, City affiliation and retiree enrollment in said group insurance plan shall immediately terminate upon rendering of the insurance carrier's decision. In such case, no retiree shall seek reimbursement from the City for any prior premiums paid by the retiree to the City as and for premium reimbursement. SECTION 9: DENTAL INSURANCE The City shall provide a dental insurance plan for all full-time continuous salaried employees within the bargaining unit. SECTION 10: OPTICAL INSURANCE The City shall provide an optical insurance plan for all full-time continuous salaried employees within the bargaining unit and elected officials. SECTION 11: VOLUNTARY EMPLOYEE BENEFIT ASSOCIATION (VEBA) The City has established a Voluntary Employee Benefit Association (VEBA) through the California Government Voluntary Employee Benefit Association to assist employees with planning for future health care expenses. Employees are allowed a one time election to opt into the plan. Represented employees shall be eligible to participate in the plan according to a schedule negotiated separately from this agreement. Contributions to the Plan shall be made as City contributions through a salary reduction arrangement. All contributions made on behalf of employees through such salary reduction arrangement are made on a pre-tax basis in accordance with IRS provisions. No Employer contributions are to be made to the plan. At the discretion of the applicable bargaining unit, contributions may be amended once per year provided that such amendment is permitted by IRS regulations and in conformity with the Plan Document. 4 P57 SECTION 12: FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCOUNT PLAN UNDER SECTION 125 The City has established a flexible spending account plan managed by a third party administrator that is open to voluntary participation of members in the bargaining unit. The City agrees to pick up all administrative fees associated with maintaining this program for bargaining unit members (including but not limited to debit card fees). SECTION 13: BEREAVEMENT LEAVE When a death occurs in the family of a full time employee, the employee shall be granted up to five (5) bereavement leave days with pay. A death certificate or other acceptable evidence may be required by the City Manager or designee before leave is allowed. Family members are defined as follows: employee's spouse or domestic partner, employee's parents, employee's grandparents, employee's children, son-in-law, daughter- in-law, employee's siblings, or employee's grandchildren, employee's spouse or domestic partner's parents, employee's spouse or domestic partner's grandparents, grandparents-in- law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, employee's spouse or domestic partner's children, employee's spouses grandchildren, or a blood relative residing with employee. The City Manager or designee shall approve such bereavement leave. (References to domestic partner refer to registered domestic partners, as defined by California Family Code Section 297.) SECTION 14: PERSONAL LEAVE Employees can use up to 20 hours of accrued sick leave, vacation, administrative leave or holiday time as personal leave. These 20 hours can be used incrementally (i.e., 1 hour, 1/2 hour) throughout the fiscal year. Use of this time is for situations requiring the employee's attention and needs to be cleared with their supervisor when using this time. Personal leave can be taken after six months service. SECTION 15: VACATION All full-time employees shall, with continuous service, accrue working hours of vacation monthly according to the following schedule. Vacation can be taken after six months service. Length of Service Hours Accrued Annual Hours in Years Per Pay Period Accrued 1 3.077 80 2 3.461 90 3 3.846 100 4 4.230 110 5 4.615 120 6-8 5.000 130 9 5.384 140 10 5.769 150 11-13 6.153 160 14 6.538 170 15+ 6.923 180 5 P58 SECTION 16: VACATION BUYBACK Annually, at the employee's written request, the City will "buy back,"the total cash value of up to 120 hours of previously earned vacation leave. This buy back shall occur twice annually, in April and November. Employees must maintain a minimum of 40 hours of accrued vacation subsequent to any payment of vacation buy back time. Employees who wish to sell back vacation must request payment of not less than 20 hours and not more than 120 hours in a calendar year. SECTION 17: SICK LEAVE All full-time employees shall, with continuous service, accrue 120 hours of sick leave annually. Sick leave can be taken after six months service. SECTION 18: SICK LEAVE BUYBACK Employees within the bargaining unit who terminate their city employment after 5 years of continuous service and have at least 50% of five years' sick leave accrued on the books upon termination can sell 120 hours back to the City. SECTION 19: HOLIDAYS The City Offices shall observe the following 14 holidays. All full time continuous salaried employees shall be compensated at their regular rate for these days. (1) July 4 Independence Day (2) First Monday of September Labor Day (3) November 11 Veteran's Day (4) Fourth Thursday of November Thanksgiving Day (5) Day following Thanksgiving Floater (6) December 24 Day preceding Christmas (7) December 25 Christmas Day (8) January 1 New Years Day (9) Third Monday of January Martin Luther King's Birthday (10) Third Monday of February President's Day (11) Last Monday of May Memorial Day (12) Three discretionary days may be taken by an employee at his/her convenience after six months service subject to approval of the department head. Days may not be carried over from one fiscal year to the next. Whenever a holiday falls on a Sunday, the following Monday shall be observed as a holiday. Whenever a holiday falls on a Friday or Saturday, the preceding Thursday shall be observed as the holiday. When a holiday combination occurs (Thanksgiving, Christmas, etc) where two consecutive days are holidays and it would result in the City Hall being open to serve the public only 2 days during the week, only one of the holidays will be observed and the other holiday will become a floating 6 P59 holiday, except as provided during a Holiday Closure pursuant to Section 38. For example, for Thanksgiving, Thursday will be observed as the regular holiday; however Friday will become a floating holiday to be used at a later date. In the instance of Thanksgiving, Christmas, or New Years, employees will have until June 30 to use those floating holidays accrued between Thanksgiving and New Years. Also, those days will not accrue as floating holidays until the actual holiday has occurred. Each year the City will designate which days will be observed and which are floating holidays. Employees who are eligible to bank a holiday have until June 30 (end of fiscal year) to use the banked holiday earned from July 1 through April 30. Any holiday banked in May and June, employees have until September 30 to use the banked holiday. SECTION 20: HOLIDAY TIME The City agrees that employees who are assigned to work on a holiday, whether or not their regular shift assignment requires they work that day, are eligible for pay at time and one-half for working that day. This time and one-half may be taken as compensation or put in a compensatory time off bank, (in effect, compensating at double time and one-half). That rate of compensation is tallied as follows: The ten hours compensation for the holiday, plus compensation at time and one-half for the hours actually worked. This payment at time and one-half abrogates the employee's right to that holiday. SECTION 21: PREMIUM HOLIDAY COMPENSATION Maintenance employees in the bargaining unit required as part of the regular work assignment to work on Christmas Day, New Years Day, Independence Day or Thanksgiving Day, are allowed to observe the holiday on another day. Additionally, these employees who work on the aforementioned designated holidays may select to receive compensation on that holiday at time and one-half for the ten hour shift, or take a second holiday as time off at a later date. SECTION 22: NATAL AND ADOPTION LEAVE WITHOUT PAY The City shall provide employees within the bargaining unit up to four months natal and adoption leave for the birth or adoption of a child; such leave shall be pursuant to the provisions of the California Pregnancy Disability Act ("PDA"; California Government Code Section 12945), if applicable. The City's PDA policy is incorporated herein by reference. Employees on this leave of absence without pay beyond the four-month period will be responsible for the payment of medical, dental and optical premiums to keep the coverage in force during the leave of absence. SECTION 23: NATAL AND ADOPTION LEAVE WITH PAY Employees within the bargaining unit are granted up to 2 days natal and adoption leave with pay for the birth or adoption of a child, however, use of the 2 paid days does not extend any time charged under FMLA or CFRA. Any paid time required beyond this initial 2 days must be charged to sick leave, vacation, compensatory or floating holiday time. SECTION 24: WORKERS COMPENSATION LEAVE Any employee covered herein who is receiving disability payments under the "Workers Compensation Act of California" for on-the-job injuries sustained while engaged in the 7 P60 performance of duties of any such City position, shall receive from the City during the first three months of such disability absence, payments in an amount equal to the difference between the disability payments received under Workers Compensation Act and the employee's full salary. Such payments by the City should be made without any deduction from accrued sick leave benefits. The City's obligation for such payments shall commence on the first (1st) day of such disability absence. In the event the employee's disability absence should exceed three months, an employee shall be allowed to supplement the Workers Compensation benefit received under State law with available accrued sick leave, accrued vacation leave or accrued compensatory time. The total number of leave hours, along with the Workers Compensation benefit, shall not exceed the employee's base pay for each day of the leave. For this purpose, accrued leave hours can only be used in one- hour increments. SECTION 25: MILITARY LEAVE Employees required to serve military leave will be compensated pursuant to the Military and Veterans Code. To qualify for.compensation the military orders must be submitted to the supervisor prior to their tour of duty and must be attached to the timecard for that pay period. SECTION 26: MILITARY SERVICE BUY BACK Employees have the option for military service buy back at the employee's expense. SECTION 27: OVERTIME-MAINTENANCE(NON-SBPEA) The City agrees that employees who are sent home to rest and to be available to work additional hours as a result of a storm or impending emergency situation and are not subsequently recalled to work, will be compensated for the hours not worked in that shift, due to them having been sent home, to bring the total hours to 8 or 10 worked in that shift depending on their regular schedule. Employees who are subsequently recalled to work the storm or emergency situation will work no more than 12 consecutive hours. Any hours worked in excess of 8 or 10 in that 12 hour shift depending on their regular schedule will be paid at time and one-half, regardless of the total numbers of compensated hours for that work week. SECTION 28: ON CALL PAY Employees required to be on call shall be compensated at the rate of$200.00 per week. SECTION 29: SAFETY FOOTWEAR AND UNIFORMS The City will provide up to $200.00 annually toward the purchase of safety footwear at a city designated vendor for employees required to wear safety footwear in the performance of their job duties. The current classifications of employees who may be required to wear safety footwear are Animal License Canvasser, Animal Services Officer, Assistant Engineer, Building Inspector, Building Inspector Supervisor, Business License Technician, Code Enforcement Officer, Code Enforcement Supervisor, Environmental Programs Coordinator, Environmental Programs Inspector, Fleet Supervisor, Maintenance Superintendent, Maintenance Supervisor, Public Works Inspector, Public Works Inspector 8 P61 I, Public Works Inspector II, Safety Coordinator, Senior Animal Services Officer, Senior Building Inspector, Senior Electrician, and Supervising Public Works.Inspector, The City may provide uniforms (including shirts) and/or maintenance of uniforms for the following positions: Animal Care Attendant, Animal Caretaker, Animal Care Supervisor, Animal Handler,Animal License Canvasser, Animal Services Dispatcher,Animal Services Officer, Building Inspector, Business License Technician, Code Enforcement Officer, Fleet Supervisor, Maintenance Superintendent, Maintenance Supervisor, Office Specialist II (Animal Care & Services) Senior Building Inspector, Senior Electrician, Theater Production Supervisor, and Theater Technician III. SECTION 30: RETIREMENT BENEFIT Unit members who do not meet the definition of"new member" under the California Public Employees' Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA) (those unit members shall be referred to as "classic members") are enrolled in either the CaIPERS retirement plan commonly referred to as the 2.5% at age 55 retirement plan ("Tier 1" and "Tier 2"), or in the 2% at age 55 retirement plan ("Tier 3")and shall be provided the benefits as described below: A. Tier 1 - Employees Hired Before September 1, 2010 § 21354.4 2.5% at 55 Full Formula § 21574 4th Level 1959 Survivor § 20042 1 Yr Final Compensation Until the first full pay period in July 2015, City pays the normal eight percent (8%) CaIPERS member contribution per Resolution 11-063. Effective July 1, 2013, employees shall pay one percentage point (1%) of the normal CaIPERS employer contribution, in addition to the portion of the member contributions described below. Effective with the first full pay period in July 2015, employees will also pay two percent (2%) of their PERSable compensation towards their CaIPERS member contribution, and City pays six percent (6%) of the normal CaIPERS Member contribution. Effective the first full pay period in July 2016, employees will pay an additional two percent (2%) of their PERSable compensation towards their CaIPERS member contribution for a total of four percent (4%), and City pays four percent (4%) of the normal CaIPERS Member contribution. B. Tier 2- Employees Hired Between September 1, 2010 and July 3, 2011 § 21354.4 2.5% at 55 Full Formula § 21574 4th Level 1959 Survivor § 20042 1 Yr Final Compensation Until the first full pay period in July 2015, City pays seven percent (7%) of the normal CaIPERS member contribution; employee pays one percentage point (1%) of the CaIPERS member contribution per Resolution 11-063. 9 P62 Effective the first full pay period in July 2015, employees will pay an additional two percent (2%) of their PERSable compensation towards their CaIPERS member contribution for a total of three percent (3%), and City pays five percent (5%) of the normal CaIPERS Member contribution. Effective the first full pay period in July 2016, employees will pay an additional two percent (2%) of their PERSable compensation towards their CaIPERS member contribution for a total of five percent(5%), and City pays three percent (3%) of the normal CaIPERS Member contribution. C. Tier 3 - Employees Hired on or After July 4, 2011 § 21354 2% @ 55 Full Formula § 21574 4th Level 1959 Survivor § 20037 3 Yr Final Compensation City pays six percent (6%) of the normal CaIPERS member contribution; employee pays one percentage point (1%) of the CaIPERS member contribution per Resolution 11-063. Effective the first full pay period in July 2015, employees will pay an additional two percent (2%) of their PERSable compensation towards their CaIPERS member contribution. (City pays four percent (4%) of the normal CaIPERS Member contribution and employee pays three percent(3%) of the normal CaIPERS member contribution). Effective the first full pay period in July 2016, employees will pay an additional two percent (2%) of their PERSable compensation towards their CaIPERS member contribution. (City pays two percent (2%) of the normal CaIPERS Member contribution and employee pays five percent (5%) of the normal CaIPERS member contribution). D. It is understood that all contributions paid by the employee as described in Parts A through C above shall be calculated based upon the full base salary of the employee, plus any additional PERSable compensation, and any Employer Paid Member Contributions (EPMC). E. The City pays EPMC for the various"Tiers" as outlined above and reports the value of EPMC payments as special compensation. The parties agree that to the extent permitted by law, this is special compensation and shall be reported as such pursuant to Title 2 CCR, Section 571(a)(1)(F) as Value of Employer-Paid Member Contributions. The parties also agree that the City has no additional obligation or costs should CaIPERS, the State or the IRS determine otherwise. The City shall adopt necessary resolutions related to the changes in EPMC effective the first full pay period in July of 2015 and the first full pay period in in July of 2016. The City adopted a resolution providing that all employee CaIPERS contributions 10 P63 shall be deducted on a pre-tax basis to the extent permitted by law or IRS regulation. There shall be no sunset date to any provision in Section 30. F. The California Public Employees' Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA) -As it may from time to time exist, the PEPRA shall in its entirety be given full force and effect. Any provision in the 2014-2017 MOU which contradicts any provision of the PEPRA shall be deemed null and void, with the contrary PEPRA provision(s) being given full force and effect. Therefore, no provision of PEPRA shall be deemed to impair any provision of the 2014-2017 MOU or any MOU, Agreement, Rule or Regulation predating the 2014-2017 MOU. PEPRA includes, but is not limited to, the provisions described below: Unit members hired on and after January 1, 2013, deemed to be a "new member" as defined in Government Code § 7522.04, shall individually pay an initial Member CALPERS contribution rate of 50% of the normal cost rate for the Defined Benefit Plan in which said "new member" is enrolled, rounded to the nearest quarter of 1%, or the current contribution rate of similarly situated employees, whichever is greater. Unit members who are "new members" and miscellaneous employees on and after January 1, 2013, shall be enrolled in the 2% @ 62 retirement formula (Govt. Code§ 7522.20). Unit members who are "new members" on and after January 1, 2013, shall have "final compensation" measured by the highest average annual pensionable compensation earned by the member during a period of at least 36 consecutive months (Section 7522.32.), and their retirement benefits shall be calculated based on "pensionable compensation" (Section 7522.10) rather than "compensation earnable" (Section 20636). G. In addition, the City has adopted the PARS Retirement Enhancement Plan generally described as .5% (one-half percent) at 55 or at 60, depending upon the employee's hire date, for all miscellaneous employees hired on or prior to December 31, 2012. To be eligible, employees must be at least age 56, have ten (10) years of full-time continuous service and retire from the City. This benefit will be paid to qualified retirees in addition to any CaIPERS benefits to which they are entitled. SECTION 31: TUITION REIMBURSEMENT FOR APPROVED COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY COURSES Reimbursements by the City of the following enumerated college and/or university course expenses shall not exceed two thousand three hundred dollars ($2,300.00) during any fiscal year. Eligibility for said reimbursement in an amount not to exceed $2,300.00 in any one fiscal year shall be contingent upon a determination by the employee's department head or his designee that all of the following conditions precedent exists: A. Expenses shall be incurred as regards coursework undertaken at a college or university that is licensed/accredited by the State of California. 11 P64 B. The applicant for reimbursement shall represent to the Personnel Department documentation prepared by the accredited/licensed college or university which evidences the applicant's receipt of a grade of"C" or "pass" in a pass/fail class. As regards each class for which reimbursement is sought (where an employee is simultaneously enrolled in multiple approved classes and does not receive a "C"or "pass" in any one or more of such classes, the amount of expenses subject to City's reimbursement shall be reduced and/or as appropriate, pro-rated to reflect no reimbursement being made for expenses related to classes where the minimal grade was not received). C. Eligibility for reimbursement for said expenses shall be confined to either: 1)those courses that in and of themselves consist of curriculum which is predominately related to the development of skills reasonably anticipated by the City to enhance the applicant's job performance (by means of a non-inclusive example only, art classes would not qualify for reimbursement); or 2) where the employee has declared a major that is job-related as set forth in this section C, to those classes which must be completed as a condition precedent to successful completion of the course of study in the selected major. D. Eligibility for reimbursement upon completion of coursework shall be predicated upon the employee's department head or his designee, making a written determination prior to the affected employee's enrollment in the course(s)for which reimbursement is later sought, that the coursework is offered by an accredited college or university and that the above-described job nexus does exist. The determination of the Department Head or his designee in such regards shall be final. E. The costs which shall be subject to reimbursement are limited to the following: 1) tuition, 2) books, 3) supplies, 4) parking, and 5) laboratory. In addition to all other conditions precedent to reimbursement set forth in this section, prior to reimbursement being approved, written receipts shall be provided to the Personnel Department and shall evidence each expenditure for which reimbursement is sought. SECTION 32: 4/10 WORK WEEK City Hall generally operates on a 4/10 work week, hours lam to 6pm, Monday through Thursday. However, different work schedules consisting of various work hours and days may be adopted by individual departments based on departmental need. Remote facilities operate on a 40-hour work week of varying days and times. SECTION 33: CARPOOL PROGRAM The City has implemented a well-defined, equitable, carpool program that eliminated the previously provided time-off incentive with a financial incentive. The carpool program is open to all full time regular employees. Participation is voluntary and employees interested in participating shall file a Rideshare Application Agreement and comply with the requirements of the program. The financial incentive for the program is $2.60 per day for every day that the bargaining unit employee carpools. 12 P65 SECTION 34: Bilingual PAY Bargaining Unit employees who qualify for bilingual pay will be provided such at$75.00 per month, Each Department Head will determine the number of employees needed to perform translation duties per department, subject to review and approval of the Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services. Employees who receive bilingual pay are expected to perform translation services for their Department and for other City Services should the need arise. An updated list of the employees receiving bilingual pay will be provided every six-months or as changes occur. Bilingual duties will be distributed as equitable as possible. SECTION 35: PARITY PROVISION If, prior to July 1, 2015, the City provides base salary increases to other City/Fire District employees in amounts in excess of that provided to City employees pursuant to this MOU, then said additional base salary increases shall be implemented as to City employees in the payroll period(s) for which said base salary increases were made effective for other City/Fire District employees. Effective July 1, 2015, this Section of the MOU sunsets instantaneously, is null and void and will have no effect. SECTION 36: CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEES The City will provide RCCEA with a list of specific Confidential Employees whose positions are covered by the Mid-Manager, Supervisory/Professional or General Employees' bargaining units. These employees are designated as Confidential Employees due to the work they perform related to employer-employee relations and the access they have to information related to employer-employee relations. The City will update that list when a new confidential employee is hired or the duties of a current confidential employee changes and they are no longer involved in employer employee relations. Employees designated as confidential employees may not act as representatives of employee organizations which represent other employees of the City, may not represent employees in discipline or grievance procedures and may not provide information or participate in labor negotiation on behalf of RCCEA. Confidential Employees may be employed in some of the following positions (this list is not exhaustive): Account Technician Payroll Supervisor Administrative Secretary Risk Management Coordinator Budget Analyst Secretary Executive Assistant Senior Account Technician Human Resources Manager Senior Administrative Secretary Human Resources Technician 13 P66 SECTION 37: FURLOUGH EQUIVALENT PAYMENT RCCEA covered employees who contributed to the City's ongoing viability by participating in the Fiscal Year 2010-2011, 2011-2012 and/or 2012-2013 furloughs would receive a one- time payment estimated to be equivalent to the amount of salary that they personally contributed through the furlough so that the City could continue to provide services to the community and avoid additional layoffs. Qualifying employees would receive this one-time payment in a separate check on July 31, 2014. The amount that qualifying employees would receive is set forth in the document provided to RCCEA on June 19, 2014. RCCEA covered employees who would be eligible for this benefit who retire between July 1, 2014, and July 31, 2014, would receive this payment with their final check. The City does not intend to report the furlough equivalent pay to PERS as compensation. SECTION 38: Holiday Facility Closure City facilities will observe a holiday closure beginning Wednesday, December 24, 2014, through Thursday, January 1, 2015. In future years during the term of this MOU there will be Holiday Facility Closures, certain City facilities may close in conjunction with the Christmas and New Year's holidays. Closure dates for City facilities shall be determined by the City in order to balance the impact on public services. The City will strive to provide a schedule of Holiday Facility Closures at least six months or more in advance of the closure. During a holiday closure, affected represented employees may take paid leave from holiday, management leave, compensatory time, vacation accruals, or use unpaid leave. When holiday closures are implemented by the City, Section 19's provision regarding consecutive holidays shall not apply. SECTION 39: Use of Bulletin Boards and City Email System The City will furnish a portion of existing bulletin board space, located in bargaining unit break areas where such bulletin boards currently exist, for RCCEA notices. Such space will be no less than 18"x 24". If insufficient bulletin board space exists in a Bargaining Unit work or break area, the RCCEA may, after receiving approval in writing from the City, put up a bulletin board not to exceed 18" x 24" depending on available space. RCCEA may also distribute notices to covered employees through the City's email system. Bulletin boards and emails shall only be used for the following notices: • Scheduled RCCEA meetings, agenda and minutes. • Information on RCCEA elections and the results. • Information regarding RCCEA social, recreational, and related news bulletins. • Reports of official business of RCCEA, including negotiations, reports of committees or the Board of Directors. City equipment(including City computers, laptops, and tablets), materials, or supplies shall not be used for the preparation, reproduction, or distribution of notices, nor shall such notices be prepared by City employees during their regular work time. Notices that are 14 P67 posted, distributed or placed in an employee's City mailbox shall not be obscene, defamatory, or of a political nature. All notices to be posted must be dated and signed by an authorized representative of RCCEA. RCCEA agrees to follow the City's E-Mail Policy when sending emails to City employees. RCCEA understands that all electronic mail is not confidential, and that the city reserves the right to access and disclose all messages sent over its email system for any purpose in accordance with the City's E-Mail Policy. SECTION 40: Access to Work Locations The parties recognize and agree that in order to maintain good employee relations; it is necessary for Labor Relations Representatives and designated Officers and representatives of RCCEA to confer with Bargaining Unit employees during working hours. Therefore, RCCEA Labor Relations Representatives, Officers or representatives will be granted access to work locations during regular working hours to investigate and process grievances or appeals. RCCEA Labor Relations Representatives or Officers shall be granted access upon obtaining advance authorization from the designated management representative prior to entering a work location and after advising the City at least one business day in advance of the requested access, of the general nature of the business. The designated management representative may deny access or terminate access to work locations if, in their judgment, it is deemed that the visit would interfere with the efficiency, safety, or security of City operations. The designated management representative shall not unreasonably withhold timely access to work locations. The City shall ensure that there is at all times someone designated who shall have full authority to approve access. If a request is denied, the designated management representative shall establish a mutually agreeable time for access to the employee. RCCEA Labor Relations Representatives or Officers granted access to work locations shall limit such visits to a reasonable period of time, taking into consideration the nature of the grievance or appeal. The City shall not unreasonably interfere with RCCEA's access right to work locations and any reasonable denial of access shall not be subject to the grievance procedure. SECTION 41: Dues Deduction RCCEA membership dues shall be deducted by the City from the pay warrant of each employee covered hereby who files with the City a written authorization, on a form approved by the City, requesting that such deduction be made. Remittance of the aggregate amount of all membership dues deducted from the pay warrants of employees covered hereby shall be made to an RCCEA account, provided to the City by RCCEA, on a regular basis consistent with the City's regular pay periods. RCCEA dues shall be deducted in an amount per bi-weekly pay period authorized by the RCCEA Board of Directors. The City shall not be liable to RCCEA, employees, or any party by reason of the requirements of this Article for the remittance of any sum other than those constituting actual deductions made from employee wages earned. RCCEA shall hold the. City harmless for any and all claims, demands, suits, orders, judgments or other forms of liability that may arise out of or by reason of action taken by the City under this Article. SECTION 42: Use of City Resources RCCEA may be granted permission to use any City facilities accessible to the general public for meeting purposes, during the regular hours such space is accessible to the 15 P68 public, provided space for such meetings can be made available without interfering with City needs and is otherwise not reserved by any other groups or individuals. RCCEA may also be permitted to use the City Council Chambers, during regular business hours, for RCCEA meetings, provided the City Council Chambers is not otherwise reserved. Permission to use City facilities must be obtained by RCCEA from the appropriate management representative. RCCEA shall be held fully responsible for any damages to, and the security of, any City facilities that are used by RCCEA. SECTION 43: Association Release Time When RCCEA is formally meeting and conferring with representatives of the City on matters within the scope of representation during regular City business hours, a reasonable number of Officers or other representatives of the RCCEA shall be allowed reasonable time off without loss of compensation or other benefits. 1. Such Officers and representatives shall not leave their duty or workstation or assignment without the knowledge of the department head or division manager. 2. Such meetings are subject to scheduling in a manner consistent with operating needs and work schedules. RCCEA Officers or representatives shall be permitted, if requested by an RCCEA represented employee, to attend an employee counseling session, which could result in disciplinary action. Such officers or representatives shall also be permitted, if requested by the Association employee, to be present at an employee disciplinary session. 1. Such Officers or representatives shall not leave their duty or workstation or assignment without the knowledge of the department head or division manager. 2. No more than one employee at a time shall be granted release time to represent one employee. RCCEA Officers or representatives of the Association shall be given reasonable time during work hours to investigate and process specified grievances or complaints arising out of the application of MOU or personnel rules, upon prior permission from their respective department head or division manager. During the term of the next MOU, RCCEA Officers and representatives agree to track their Association release time via the payroll system. The City and RCCEA agree to review this usage to determine if limits need to be incorporated into a subsequent MOU. SECTION 44: ADOPTION OF MOU This memorandum, between the City and the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association representing the Mid-Manager, Supervisory/Professional and General Employees bargaining units, was adopted on June 26, 2014. 16 P69 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOTIATION CITY Steve Fowler John R. Gillison, City Manager President re-em Andy Miller Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/ Vice President Administrative Services 1 72 r7Th M6ttheu Addington Robert Neiuber, Human Resources Director Secretary CrystaLZts'nig- Tamara Layne Treasurer Finance Director i iy /ne Jenifer Philips CEA Business Representative Human Resources Manager 17 P70 STAFF REPORT �1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT RANCHO Date: June 26, 2014 CucAMONGA To: President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mike Bell, Fire Chief By: Pamela J. Pane, Management Analyst II Tamara Layne, Finance Director Aso Subject: CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT GENERAL FUND PRELIMINARY BUDGET IN THE AMOUNT OF $26,700,170 AND APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT IN THE AMOUNT OF $32,084,806 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014/15 AND SET FINAL APPROVAL OF A FINAL BUDGET FOR JULY 16, 2014 • RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of Directors approve and adopt the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District General Fund Preliminary Budget in the amount of $26,700,170 and the General Fund's Article XIIIB Appropriations Limit in the amount of$32,084,806 for Fiscal Year 2014/15 and set approval of a final budget for the July 16, 2014 Board Meeting. BACKGROUND The Fire District's General Fund Preliminary Budget for Fiscal Year 2014/15 is herein recommended for adoption by the Board of Directors. A Budget workshop was held on June 11, 2014, which included specific discussion regarding the preliminary budget. The proposed budget continues to meet the Council/Fire Board direction of operating independently. The Fire District was able to achieve a proposed balanced budget through a combination of slight revenue increases and continued improvements of operational and administrative efficiencies. The State of California Constitution, Article XIIIB, requires that an appropriations limit be established annually by the Board of Directors. The factor used to develop the appropriations limit is the C.P.I. change and the change in the city's population. The attached resolution adopts the annual appropriations limit as required by the Article XIIIB of the State Constitution. Based on the factors of the Gann Limit (a C.P.I. change of 0.9977% and a population change of 1.011%) per the State of California Department of Finance, the District's fiscal year 2014/15 General Fund's appropriations limit is $32,084,806. The District's fiscal year 2014/15 General Fund appropriations subject to this limit total $24,208,110. It is anticipated that the District will be at 75.45% of its Gann Limit at June 30, 2015. P71 CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT GENERAL PAGE 2 FUND PRELIMINARY BUDGET IN THE AMOUNT OF$26,700,170 AND APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT IN THE AMOUNT OF$32,084,806 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014/15 AND SET FINAL APPROVAL OF A FINAL BUDGET FOR JULY 16,2014 Please refer to the City Manager's Executive Summary for specific details regarding the Fire District's General Fund. The advertised public hearing for adoption of the Fire District General Fund Final Budget is set for July 16, 2014. Respectfully Submitted, Mike Bell Fire Chief Attachment Resolution No. FD 14-013 P72 RESOLUTION NO. FD 14-013 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A GENERAL FUND APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014/15 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION WHEREAS, Article XIIIB of the Constitution of the State of California provides that the total annual appropriations subject to limitation of the State and of each local government for the prior year be adjusted for change in the cost of living and population except as otherwise provided in Sections (5), (7) and (8) of said Article XIII-B. These exclusions are: Debt Service Funds, Revenue Bonds, Federal Funds and Grants, Contingencies, Emergencies, Enterprise Funds, Capital Improvement Carry-Overs, Capital Equipment, Intra-Governmental Service Funds, Reserves for Workers Compensation, Long-Term Disability, Retirement, Unemployment and other reserve funds that are deemed reasonable and proper per the aforementioned sections; and WHEREAS, pursuant to said Article XIII-B of the Constitution of the State of California, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District deems it to be in the best interest of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to establish a General Fund appropriations limit for Fiscal Year 2014/15; and WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District has determined that said General Fund's appropriations limit for Fiscal Year 2014/15 be established in the amount of $32,084,806. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District that a General Fund appropriations limit for Fiscal Year 2014/15 pursuant to Article XIII-B of the Constitution of the State of California be established in the amount of$32,084,806 and the same is hereby established. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said appropriations limit herein established may be changed as deemed necessary by resolution of the Board of Directors. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 26`" day of June, 2014. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary P73 I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a Meeting of said Board on the 26th day of June, 2014. Executed this _day of June 2014, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary P74 STAFF REPORT -' X RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT RANCHO Date: June 26, 2014 CUCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mike Bell, Fire Chief By: Pamela J. Pane, Management Analyst Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director /J Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS ADOPTING A BUDGET IN THE AMOUNT OF $7,159,320 AND APPROVING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT IN THE AMOUNT OF $12,222,021 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014/15 IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT (CFD) NO. 85-1 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Fire Board approve the attached resolutions adopting the Mello- Roos CFD No. 85-1 annual budget for Fiscal Year 2014/15 in the amount of$7,159,320 and the Appropriations Limit in the amount of$12,222,021. BACKGROUND Since Fiscal Year 1986/87, the Board has annually adopted a CFD budget to provide for operations and maintenance costs attributable to providing fire protection services within CFD No. 85-1. The proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2014/15 provides funding for a portion of the personnel and operational costs necessary to maintain existing fire and life safety service levels within CFD boundaries. The remaining operational and maintenance costs within the CFD are provided through the Fire District's General Fund budget. When the Fire District's CFD No. 85-1 was approved by the voters in 1985, an appropriations limit was established at $1,775,000 (1985 costs for operations and maintenance). In order to adjust the maximum spending authority (appropriations limit) to meet increased costs for operations and maintenance, the voters authorized the District to annually adjust the limit. This adjustment is based upon the same methodology used in calculating public agency Prop. 4 spending limits under Article XIIIB of the State of California Constitution. The factors used to develop the appropriations limit are the C.P.I. change and the change in the City's population. The attached resolution adopts the annual appropriations limit as required by Article XIIIB of the State Constitution. Based on the factors of the Gann Limit (a C.P.I. change of 0.9977% and a population change of 1.011%) per the State of California Department of Finance, the District's CFD No. 85-1 Fiscal Year 2014/15 appropriations limit is $12,222,021. The District's CFD No. 85-1 Fiscal Year 2014/15 appropriations subject to this limit total $6,227,740. It is anticipated that the District will be at 50.96% of its Gann Limit at June 30, 2015. P75 Approval of Fiscal Year 2014/15 Budget for Communities Facilities District No. 85-1 June 26, 2014 Page 2 On June 11, 2014, the City Council/Fire District Board of Directors conducted a comprehensive workshop regarding all budgets, which included the proposed-CFD No. 85- 1. The resolutions adopting CFD No. 85-1's annual budget and appropriations limit are now presented for your consideration of approval. Respectfully Submitted, Mike Bell Fire Chief Attachments 1. Resolution No. FD 14-014 2. Resolution No. FD 14-015 P76 RESOLUTION NO. FD 14-014 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA" FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014/15 WHEREAS, a special election was held in the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 85-1 (the "Community Facilities District") of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (formerly Foothill Fire Protection District, the "District"), on Tuesday, December 10, 1985; and. WHEREAS, as a result of the election, more than two-thirds (2/3) of the qualified electors voted in favor of a proposition to authorize the levy of a special tax for fire suppression services and facilities, to establish an appropriations limit based upon changes in cost of living and changes in population; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has received and reviewed a budget for Fiscal Year 2014/15 for the Community Facilities District. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve, determine and order as follows: Section 1. Adoption of Budget. The Board of Directors hereby approves and adopts the budget designated: Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 85-1 Annual Budget for Fiscal Year 2014/15 a copy of said budget being on file in the office of the Community Facilities District and available for public inspection. Section 2. Filing of Budget. The Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to forward a certified copy of this resolution and a copy of the budget to the Office of the Auditor-Controller for the County of San Bernardino. • P77 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 26th day of June, 2014 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary • I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a special meeting of said Board held on the 26th day of June, 2014. Executed this day of June, 2014 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary P78 RESOLUTION NO. FD 14-015 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014/15 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION WHEREAS, a special election was held in the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 85-1 (the "Community Facilities District") of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (formerly Foothill Fire Protection District, the "District"), on Tuesday, December 10, 1985; and WHEREAS, as a result of the election, more than two-thirds (2/3) of the qualified electors voted in favor of a proposition to authorize the levy of a special tax for fire suppression services and facilities, to establish an appropriations limit and to annually adjust the special tax and appropriations limit based upon changes in cost of living and changes in population; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors desires to establish the appropriations limit for the Community Facilities District 85-1 for Fiscal Year 2014/15; NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve, determine and order as follows: Section 1. Appropriations Limit. This Board of Directors hereby establishes the Fiscal Year 2014/15 appropriations limit for the Community Facilities District No. 85-1 at $12,222,021 based on the factors of the Gann limit (a C.P.I. change of 0.9977% and a population change of 1.011%) per the State of California Department of Finance. Section 2. Approval of Electorate. This Board of Directors hereby finds and determines that the foregoing appropriations limit has been established by the qualified electorate at a special election held on December 10, 1985, in the manner provided by law. Section 3. Filing. The Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the Board of Supervisors for San Bernardino County and with the office of the Auditor-Controller for the State of California. P79 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 26'h day of June, 2014. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary 'I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a special meeting of said Board held on the 26'h day of June, 2014. Executed this_day of June, 2014 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary Resolution No. 14-015 - Page 2 of 2 P80 STAFF REPORT r RANCHO CUCANIONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT �L RANCHO Date: June 26, 2014 CUCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mike Bell, Fire Chief By: Pamela J. Pane, Management Analyst II Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS ADOPTING A BUDGET IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,221,520 AND APPROVING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,924,313 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014/15 IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 RECOMMENDATION Approval of resolutions adopting a budget in the amount of $2,221,520 and the appropriations limit in the amount of $2,924,313 for fiscal year 2014/15 in Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 88-1. BACKGROUND On April 4, 1989, the qualified voters approved the formation of Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 88-1 and authorized the District to annually levy a special tax to provide for fire protection services within northeast Etiwanda. On May 19, 1989, the Board adopted an ordinance authorizing the levy of a special tax in CFD 88-1. The ordinance authorizes the District, by resolution, to annually levy the special tax for purposes of land acquisition, fire station construction, purchase of equipment and operations and maintenance costs (which includes personnel) to provide fire protection services within CFD 88-1. Fiscal Year 2014/15 is the twenty-sixth (26) consecutive year the District has levied a special tax to provide required revenues for capital improvements (land, fire station facility, equipment) and fire protection services (personnel, and operations and maintenance (O&M)) within this CFD. Accordingly, the Fiscal Year 2014/15 budget includes fully burdened personnel costs associated with existing memorandums of understanding between the District and its bargaining units. Because CFD 88-1 does not currently generate sufficient funds to fully support the total annual staffing costs, supplemental funding will be necessary thru the Fire District's General Fund budget. P81 CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS ADOPTING A BUDGET IN THE AMOUNT OF PAGE 2 $2,221,520 AND APPROVING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT IN THE AMOUNT OF$2,924,313 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014/15 IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.88-1 JUNE 26,2014 The following resolutions are submitted for your consideration to adopt the fiscal year 2014/15 annual budget and appropriations limit in CFD No. 88-1. 1. A resolution adopting the fiscal year 2014/15 proposed budget in the amount of $2,221,520. 2. A resolution adopting the fiscal year 2014/15 appropriations limit in an amount equal to the maximum authorized special taxes which could be levied in fiscal year 2014/15. The resolution sets an appropriations limit for fiscal year 2014/15 at $2,924,313. On June 11, 2014, the Board conducted a comprehensive budget workshop regarding all budgets, which included the proposed CFD No. 88-1 budget. The resolutions adopting CFD No. 88-1 annual budget and appropriations limit are now presented for your consideration of approval. Respectfully Submitted, i// Mike Bell Fire Chief Attachments: Resolution No. FD 14-016 Resolution No. FD 14-017 P82 RESOLUTION NO. FD 14-016 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014/15 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (formerly Foothill Fire Protection District, hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body") has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a community facilities district, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", as amended, being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California. This Community Facilities is designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and ' WHEREAS, this legislative body has received and reviewed a budget for Fiscal Year 2014/15 for the District. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve, determine and order as follows: Section 1. Adoption of Budget. The Board of Directors hereby approves and adopts the budget designated: "Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 88-1 Annual Budget for Fiscal Year 2014/15" and is on file in the office of the District and available for public inspection. P83 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of June, 2014. AYES: NOES: • ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a special meeting of said Board held on the 26th day of June, 2014. Executed this day of June 2014, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary Resolution No. FD 14-016 - Page 2 of 2 P84 RESOLUTION NO. FD 14-017 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014/15 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (formerly Foothill Fire Protection District, hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body") has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a community facilities district, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", as amended, being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California. This Community Facilities District is designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, as a result of such election, the qualified electors of the District authorized the establishment of an Article XII I-B appropriations limit for the District equal to the maximum authorized special taxes which may be levied in any fiscal year; and WHEREAS, this legislative body desires to establish the appropriations limit for the District for Fiscal Year 2014/15. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve, determine and order as follows: SECTION 1. Appropriations Limit. This legislative body hereby establishes the appropriations limit for Community Facilities District No. 88-1 for Fiscal Year 2014/15 in an amount equal to $2,924,313. SECTION 2. Approval by Electorate. This legislative body hereby finds and determines that the foregoing appropriations limit has been authorized by the qualified electors of the District at a special election held on April 4, 1989, in the manner provided by law. P85 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of June, 2014. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a special meeting of said Board held of the 26'" day of June, 2014. Executed this day of June 2014, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary Resolution No. 14-017 - Page 2 of 2 P86 STAFF REPORT I V ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES GROUP Lt�J RANCHO Date: June 26, 2014 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director gaigto Subject: ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2014/15 BUDGET AND ARTICLE XIIIB APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT RECOMMENDATION 1. Council approve the attached resolution authorizing the Fiscal Year 2014/15 budget. 2. Council approve the attached resolution adopting the Article XIIIB Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 2014/15. BACKGROUND 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has proposed a one-year program of service with the 2014/15 fiscal year budget. The attached resolution adopts that one-year budget following the Council's deliberations at the publicly held budget study sessions. FISCAL YEAR 2014/15 BUDGET General Fund $ 69,162.990 Library Services $ 4,222,020 Special Funds $ 62,417,580 Total $135,802,590 2. The State of California Constitution, Article XIIIB, requires that an appropriations limit be established annually by the City Council. The factor used to develop the appropriations limit is the C.P.I. change and the change in the City's population per the State of California Department of Finance. The additional attached resolution adopts the annual appropriations limit as required by Article XIIIB of the State Constitution. Based on the factors of the Gann Limit (a C.P.I. change of 0.9977% and a population change of 1.011%), the City's Fiscal Year 2014/15 appropriations limit is$68,820,930. The City's Fiscal Year 2014/15 appropriations subject to this limit total $53,966,070. It is anticipated that the City will be at 78.42% of its Gann Limit at June 30, 2015. Attachments 1. Resolution No. 14-105 2. Resolution No. 14-106 is/finance/budget2015/City Council staff reports/Citi budget adoption 2014-15.doc P87 RESOLUTION NO. 14-105 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING THE CITY'S FISCAL YEAR 2014/15 BUDGET WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a workshop to review the appropriation requests for Fiscal Year 2014/15 on June 11, 2014,,and; WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a public meeting on the General City Budget, and; WHEREAS, this public meeting was noticed in accordance with applicable laws and held on June 11, 2014; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does hereby resolve on this 26" day of June 2014, as follows: Section 1: Adoption of Fiscal Year 2014/15 Budget. The City of Rancho Cucamonga budget for Fiscal Year 2014/15, on file in the office of the Finance Director, is hereby adopted in the amount of $135,805,590. This budget total includes appropriations for both the general and other special purpose funds. Section 2: Transfers of Funds Between and/or Within Appropriations. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga may transfer funds between funds or activities set forth in the budget. The City Manager may transfers funds between appropriations within any fund as set forth in the budget and may transfer appropriations between activities within any cost center in the same fund. Section 3: Transfers of Funds Between Funds. Transfers of funds between funds as shown throughout the fund transfer sections of the budget shall be made as expenditures warrant such transfers. Section 4: Disbursements. The City Manager and the Finance Director, or the duly designated representative, are hereby empowered and authorized to disburse funds pursuant to appropriations provided for in the Fiscal Year 2014/15 Budget, and have the responsibility to establish procedures and to administratively implement and control the budget on all matters, except direct expenditures by Councilmembers which require Council approval. Section 5: Additional Appropriations. The City Council may amend this temporary budget to add or delete appropriations. Section 6: Personnel. The City Manager is hereby empowered and authorized to develop and fill additional positions as deemed necessary to conduct City operations provided funding is available in the budget. P88 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 26`" day of June, 2014. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at an adjourned meeting of said City Council held on the 26th day of June 2014. Executed this day of June 2014, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P89 RESOLUTION NO. 14-106 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE CONSTITUTION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014/15 WHEREAS, Article XIIIB of the State of California provides that the total annual appropriations subject to limitation of the State and of each local government shall not exceed the appropriations limit of such entity of government for the prior year adjusted for changes in the cost of living and population except as otherwise provided in said Article XIIIB, and; WHEREAS, pursuant to said Article XIIIB of the Constitution of the State of California, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga deems it to be in the best interests of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to establish an appropriations limit for Fiscal Year 2014/15, and; WHEREAS, the Finance Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined that said appropriations limit for Fiscal Year 2014/15 be established in the amount of $68,820,930. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does hereby resolve that an appropriations limit for Fiscal Year 2014/15 pursuant to Article XIIIB of the Constitution of the State of California be established in the amount of$68,820,930 and the same is hereby established. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said appropriations limit herein established may be changed as deemed necessary by resolution of the City Council. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 26'" day of June, 2014. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P90 I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at an adjourned meeting of said City Council held on the 26'" day of June 2014. Executed this _day of June 2014, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk i1financelbudget20151City Council staff reports\Resolution-City Appropriations Limit 2014-15.doc 40410 • • d -le Fiscal Year 2014/2015 Capital Improvement Program Presented by: Y City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Tel: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 www.cityofrc.com CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2014/15 SUMMARY Categories Budgeted Unfunded General Plan:Policy Reference A. Beautification (1) $ 400,000 $ - GP:CM-3.10,CM-3.11,PS-12.7 B. Drainage (1) $ 35,000 $ - GP:CM-4.4,CM-3.7 C. Facilities (11) $ 1,675,000 $ 22,050,000 GP: ED-3.1,PF-1.1,PF-1.4, PF-1.5 D. Miscellaneous (4) $ 748,810 $ 719,360 GP:CM-1.4,CM-2.1,CM-3.7,CS-6.3, LU-11.2,PS-12.4 E. Municipal Utility (1) $ 481,000 $ - GP: PF-1.4, RC-4.2 F. Parks (8) $ 878,170 $ 3,635,087 GP:CS-1.8,PF-1.4 • G. Railroad Crossings (2) $ 1,300,500 $ 75,000 GP:CM-1.2,CM-4.4 H. Streets (25) $ 4,430,300 $ 20,176,200 GP:CM-1-1,CM-2.1,CM-4.4, ED-4.3 I. Traffic (4) $ 717,500 $ 287,500 GP; CM-4.1,CM-4.2 TOTAL (57) $ 10,646,280 $ 46,943,147 J. Future& Unfunded Projects (21) $ 88,955,500 GP:CM-1.1,CM-4.4,CS-1.8, ED-3.1, PS-12.4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM- FISCAL YEAR 2014/15 No. Project Fund Account Amount(S) A. Beautification 1 LMD 4R-Water Conservation and Landscape Renovations ,LMD 4R 11343035650/1787134-0 400,000 (Multi-Phased Project) Beautification UnFunded Total: o Beautification Funded Total: 400,000 B. Drainage 1 Pacific Electric Trail at Victoria Park Lane-Drainage Improvement - General Drainage 11123035650/1874112-0 35,000 Drainage UnFunded 0 Dr Drainage Funded Total:Total: 95,000 C. Facilities 1 City Facilities-Roofing Survey Capital Reserve 1025001-5300 45,000 2 Civic Center-Landscape Renovation Capital Reserve 1025001-5607 240,000 3 Civic Center-Parking and Exterior Lighting Capital Reserve 1025001-5607 140,000 4 Civic Center-Roof System Restoration/Patio Replacement Capital Reserve 10250015650/1892025-0 780,000 5 Cultural Arts Center-Exterior Joint Repairs Capital Reserve 10250015650/1890025-0 25,000 6 Fire District-Jersey Station 174 Training Facility Fire Capital Projects 32885015850/1735288.0 50,000 (Design,with Construction FY15/16 If funds are available) Fire Capital Projects 32885015650/1735288-0 15 000 000 • 15,050,000 7 Paul A.Biane Library-2nd Floor Rancho KIDS Project Library Capital Fund 13296015650/1897329-0 220,000 (Construction funded FY15/16 to FY16/17-multi-phased) Library Capital Fund 13296015650/1867329-0 7 050130g 7,270,000 8 Public Safety Building-HVAC LAO Law Enforcement Reserve 10177015650/1893017-0 100,000 9 Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center-Relocation Park Development 11203055650/1896120-0 30,000 10 Victoria Gardens Cultural Center-Courtyard Redesign Capital Reserve 10250015650/18940250 15,000 CFD 2003-01 Cultural Ctr 16153035850/1894615-0 ____ 20,000 11 Victoria Gardens Cultural Center-Loading Bay Capital Reserve 10250015650/1895025-0 25,000 Facilities UnFunded Total: 22,050,000 Facilities Funded Total: 1,675,000: D. Miscellaneous 1 Arrow Route Utility Underground-Bear Gulch to West of Archibald Ave Underground Utilities 11293035850/1777129-0 1,000 (Continuation of Design,with Construction funded FY15/16) Underground Utilities 11293035650/1777129-0 719 360 720,360 2 Base Line Rd Utility Underground-Carnelian St to Vineyard Ave Underground Utilities 11293035650/1776129-0 554,570 3 Bus Stop Pads at Various Locations Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035850/1823174-0 18,640 Ped Grant Artlde 3 12143035650/1823214-0 74600 93,240 4 Illuminated Street Name Sign Upgrade Gas Tax 11703035650/1693170-0 100,000 Miscellaneous UnFunded Total: 719.360 Miscellaneous Funded Total: 748,810 E. Municipal Utility-Electrical 1 Haven Ave Electric Line Extension from 6th St.to 8th SL Municipal Utility 17053035650/1883705-0 461,000 Municipal Utility UnFunded Total: 0 Municipal Utility Funded Total: •461,000 II CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM- FISCAL YEAR 2014/15 No. Project Fund Account Amount($) F. Parks 1 Central Park-Outdoor Improvements Park Development 11203055650/1871120-0 50,000 2 Central Park-Pavillion Phase II Improvements Park Development 11203055650/1803120-0 82,250 3 Etiwanda Creek Park-Sidewalk Improvements Park Development 11203055650/1861120-0 250,000 4 Park Playground ADA and CPSC Improvements LMD 4R 11343035650/1860134-0 150,000 5 Park Playground Rubberized Surface Maintenance LMD 4R 1134303-5607 16,000 6 Park Playground Seat Wall LMD 4R 1134303-5607 8,720 7 Southwest Cucamonga Park-New Park Prop 84 State Grant 12353055650/1754235-0 283,500 (Continuation of Design,construction FY 15/16) Prop 84 State Grant 12353055650/1754235-0 3 635 087 3,918,587 8 Various Parks within LMD 4-Ballfield Fence and Curb Replacement LMD 4R 1134303-5607 37,700 . Parks UnFunded Total: 3,635,087 Parks Funded Total: 874170 G. Railroad Crossings 1 Arrow Route at Railroad Spur-New Concrete Panels Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035650/1819174-0 500 • (Design,with Construction FY15/16 if funds are available) Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035850/1819174-0 75 000 75,500 2 Hellman Avenue at Metrolink Tracks-Widen Crossing Transportation 11243035650/1847124-0 850,000 (Design and Construction) Citywide Infrastructure 11983035650/1847198-0 850.000 1,300,000 Railroad Crossings UnFunded Total: 75,000 Railroad Crossings Funded Total: 1,300,500 H. Streets 1 4th Street from Archibald to Haven-North Side Pavement Rehabilitation Measure I 11773035650/1853177.0 500 (Continuation of Survey and Design,with Construction funded FY15/16) Measure I 11773035650/1853177-0 305 000 Note: possible Catkecyde 3 Rebate 305,500 2 6th Street from Hermosa to Haven-Pavement Rehabilitation Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035650/1849174-0 300,000 (Construction).Note: possible CalRecycle 2 Rebate 3 7th St from Hellman to Archibald-Pavement Rehabilitation Gas Tax R&T 7380 11743035650/1876174-0 20,000 (Survey and Design,with Construction funded FY15/16) Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035650/1876174-0 250 000 Note: possible CalRecycle 3 Rebate 270,000 4 8th Street from Baker to Hellman-Pavement Rehabilitation Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035850/1851174-0 300,000 (Construction).Note: possible CalRecycle 2 Rebate 5 9th Street west of Vineyard-Sidewalk Citywide Infrastructure 11983035650/1808198-0 25,000 Improvements(Design and Construction) Safe Rte To School Grant 12343035650/1808234-0 90.8W Note:SRTS Federal Cycle 3 Grant 115,800 6 19th Street from West City Limit to Haven-Pavement Rehabilitation Measure I 11763035650/1836176.0• 174,000 (Construction).Note: possible CalRecycle 2 Rebate Measure I 11773035650/1836177-0 901,006 1,375,000 7 Archibald Ave from 4th to Foothill-Pavement Rehabilitation Measure I 11773035850/1852177-0 500 (Continuation of Design,with Construction funded FY15/16) Measure I 11773035650/1852177-0 1 201 OOQ Note: possible CalRecycle 3 Rebate 1,201,500 III • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM- FISCAL YEAR 2014/15 No. Project Fund Account Amount($) 8 Archibald Ave from Hillside to North City Limit-Pavement Rehabilitation Measure I 11773035650/1727177-0 500 (Continuation of Design,with Construction funded FY15/16) Measure I 11773035650/1727177-0 550 000 Note: possible CalRecycle 3 Rebate 550,500 9 Baker St from Main to Foothill-Pavement Rehabilitation Measure I 11773035650/1869177-0 350,000 (Construction).Note: possible CalRecycle 2 Rebate 10 Base Line Rd-at 1-15 Interchange Transportation 11243035650/1351124-0 200,000 (Continuation of Construction) 11 Carnelian St from Lemon Ave to Wilson Ave-Pavement Rehabilitation Measure I 11773035650/1722177-0 500 (Continuation of Survey and Design,with Construction funded FY15/16) Measure I 11773035650/1722177-0 500 000 Note: possible CalRecycle 3 Rebate 500,500 12 Etiwanda Ave from 6th St to Arrow Route-Widening Transportation 11243035650/1078124-0 75,000 (Conceptual Plan) Citywide Infrastructure 11983035650/1076198-0 ,71.000 100,000 13 Foothill Blvd across SCE Corridor West of Day Creek Channel-Sidewalk Citywide Infrastructure 11983035650/1826198-0 145,000 Improvements(Survey,Design and Construction) 14 Foothill Blvd from Vineyard to Archibald-Pavement Rehabilitation Measure I 11773035850/1855177-0 500 (Survey and Design,with Construction funded FY15/18) Measure I 11773035650/1855177-0 802 OOQ Note: possible CalRecycle 3 Rebate 802,500 15 Haven Ave from Wilson to North City Limit-Pavement Rehabilitation Measure I 11773035650/1854177-0 500 (Survey and Design,with Construction funded FY15/16) Measure I 11773035650/1854177-0 750 000 Note: possible CalRecycle 3 Rebate 750,500 16 Hellman Ave from Base Line Rd to 19th St-Pavement Rehabilitation Gas Tax RT7380 11743035650/1816174-0 410,000 (Construction).Note: possible CalRecycle 2 Rebate 17 Hermosa Ave from Banyan to Wilson-Pavement Rehabilitation Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035850/1815174-0 500 (Continuation of Design,with Construction FY15/16 if funds are available) Unknown xxxxxv0000d1815xxx-0 280 OOQ Related to Hermosa storm drain 260,500 18 Lemon Ave from Archibald to Haven-Pavement Rehabilitation Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035850/17931740 500 (Continuation of Design,with Construction FY17/18 if funds are available) Unknown xpmx0000y1793xnr-0 560.0M Related to Lemon storm drain 580,500 19 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation at Various Locations Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035650/10221740 850,000 (Survey,Design and Constructor) Prop 42 11903035650/1022190-0 109.000 959,000 20 Madrone Ave North of 9th St-Widening with Southwest Cucamonga Path Gas Tax R&T 7380 11743035850/1816174-0 500 (Continuation of Survey and Design,with Construction funded FY15/16) Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035650/1818174-0 127 200 127,700 21 Rochester from Foothill Blvd to Base Line Rd-Pavement Rehabilitation Measure I 11773035650/1821177-0 500 (Continuation of Design,with Construction funded FY16/17) Measure I 11773035650/1821177-0 5130,000 590,500 22 San Bernardino Rd from Camelian to Archibald-Pavement Rehabilitation Gas Tax R&T 7380 11743035650/1877174-0 20,000 (Survey and Design,with Construction funded FY15/16) Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035650/18771740 275 000 Note: possible CalRecycle 3 Rebate 295,000 23 Spruce Ave from Foothill to Base Line-Pavement Rehabilitation Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035650/1878174-0 30,000 (Survey and Design,with Construction funded FY15/16) Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035850/1878174-0 600 000 Note: possible CalRecycle 3 Rebate . 630,000 24 Victoria Street from Etlwanda to East City Limit-Widening and Pavement Transportation 11243035850/18381240 500 Rehabilitation(Continuation of Design,with Construction funded FY15/16) Measure I 11783035650/1838176.0 350,000 Transportation 11243035650/1838124-0 56000 406,500 25 Youngs Canyon Road from Koch Place to Cherry Ave-Street Extension AD 88-2 Etiw.anda/Highlnd 18133035650/1601813-0 100,000 (Environmental,conceptual design and Flood Control basins review/study) AD 88-2 Etiwanda/Hlghlnd 18133035650/1601813-0 13 000 000 13,100,000 Streets Unfunded Total: 20,176,200 Streets Funded Total: 4434300 Iv CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM- FISCAL YEAR 2014/15 No. Project Fund Account Amount($) I. Traffic I 6th St at Utica Ave-Traffic Signal Installation Transportation 11243035650/1889124-0 12,500 Transportation 11243035850/1869124-0 287 500 300,000 2 Carnelian St at Banyan St-Traffic Signal Installation Transportation 11243035850/18871240 300,000 3 Milliken Ave and Day Creek Blvd Traffic Signals-Upgrade Left Turn Phases Transportation 11243035650/1875124-0 125,000 4 Traffic Management Center-Upgrade Project Citywide Transportation 11243035650/1831124-0 280,000 Traffic UnFunded Total: 287,500 Traffic Funded Total: 717,500. J. Future&Unfunded Projects 1 Archibald Ave from Church to Palo Alto-Storm Drain Unknown >oou000acnW1805xror-0 1,215,000 (Design and Construction) 2 Archibald Ave from N/O Norbrook to Cagan St-Community Trail West Side Unknown c omc0000cx/1030oa-0 103,000 (Continuation of Design,with Construction FY16/17 if funds are available) 3 Central Park-Replace Flooring Capital Reserve 1025001-5295 125,000 4 Civic Center-Earthquake Strapping Capital Reserve 1025001-xoor 50,000 5 Civic Center and Public Safety Building-ADA Assessment of Exterior Doors Capital Reserve 1025001-5802 20,000 8 Etiwanda Ave Electric Line Extension from Arrow to Foothill Municipal Utility 17053035850/1885705-0 602,500 7 Etiwanda Ave-Grade Separation at Metrolink Tracks Unknown xxlcm00000u1078roor-0 40,000,000 8 Etiwanda Creek Park-Phase II Park Development 11203055650/1684120-0 5,580,000 9 Fire District-Banyan Station 175 Expansion Fire Capital Projects 32885015650/1779288-0 2,500,000 10 Fire District-Central Station 178(New Fire Station) Fire Capital Projects 32885015050/1845288-0 8,000,000 11 Fire District-Operation/Dispatch Building Fire Capital Projects 32885015650/1392288-0 11,000,000 12 Fire District-San Bernardino Station 172 Relocation Fire Capital Projects 32885015650/1733288-0 8,500,000 13 Foothill Blvd from Grove Ave to San Bernardino Rd-Widening with Median Unknown I000000row/1189toa-0 4,630,000 Island including Landscaped Median to Vineyard (Right-of-Way and Construction) 14 Haven Ave Worn Wilson to Vivienda-Community Trail on the West Side Unknown )o coccca/1829xxx-0 125,000 (Continuation of Design,with Construction FY15/18 if funds are available) 15 Hermosa Ave from the Alta Loma Basin to Wilson-Storm Drain Unknown xocccc0000u1810wa-0 2,245,000 (Continuation of Design,with Construction FY15/16 if funds are available) Related to Hermosa pavement rehabilitation 18 Lemon Avenue from Haven to 1300 feet west-Storm Drain Unknown oo00000000J179Uoor-0 1,700,000 (Continuation of Design,with Construction FY17/18 if funds are available) Related to Lemon pavement rehabilitation 17 Miller Ave at East Ave.New Traffic Signal Installation Transportation 11243035650/1888124-0 300,000 18 Pacific Electric Trail Enhancements-West to East City Limits Beautification 11103165850/1775110.0 10,000 Citywide Infrastructure 119B3035850/1775198-0 100 000 110,000 19 Red Hill Park-Pedestrian Paseo PD 85 Redemption 18483035850/1621848-0 100,000 20 Safety Lighting-Upgrades at Various Intersections Transportation 11243035650/1842124-0 150,000 21 Upper Cucamonga Storm Drain Phase III-East of Hellman to Base Line to Unknown Unknown 3,900,000 Roberds,North on Amethyst to 19th SI,and Easterly 300 feet Future&Unfunded Total: 88,955,500 V 1 ____________l I j j 3 111131}�ti _ • I 111 :::i1111 1 ,L. • Beautification Typical Beautification projects include parkway landscape, median islands, plant material replacement, community trail landscape and open space preservation. The City strives to plan and budget for projects that exemplify Rancho Cucamonga's aesthetic standards, particularly in areas of the City that are older and undergoing rehabilitation. Many Beautification projects bring these areas into alignment with the rest of the City. The City adheres to a Xeriscape policy in all of its plant material selection, ensuring current water conservation stand- ards, as well as the adaptability of plants, trees, flowers and shrubs to Southern California's warm and dry climate. This practice helps to reduce ongoing maintenance and irrigation costs. Beautification projects are typically funded via the Beautification Fund (110), which is a product of new residential and commercial development fees. Other examples of funding include Park Development, Capital Reserves and Park and Landscape Maintenance District funds. Project List& FY 2014-15 Expenditures Sources of Funding for FY 2014-15 I. LMD 4R Water Conservation and $400,000 Landscape Renovations Total $400,000 540 , 0 ■ LMD 4R A ' Project Number: IL Key: 1787 Object: LMD 4-Water Conservation/Landscape Renovation Study Project Location: _.-- i'—' ' 0 0-'n o u rat Lt•=.•ad;:R l`-lL--d -9-'•_ ,.IIrJl flS s LMD4 © 1 JI : } .A;t, O^Ar,{'(q tscoMMu4Siftuvlu].T IL'j f ' nl1��t�lB 1 �_� j ii I ,I• OL )r�\1 III C 4 .-5-firli5lij Fr ID - E -- Cv s Est.Construction Start/End: qt. J1 ore ton VAra x ���� I. a ENT ,fir _ j -j l •, �� riRA ilJC July 2014-June 2015 .+eNT�RkyueI � �� � .- ��/`.� . (�fJ/�L�mEN .� !• — i /,. .IDDLE t ') • U114� J', aT VTH MV55- a�� �!r^' � , • II � � n C � -f 1 � Project Status: -�-5-��'� ROJECTZOCATION �` - '"'�1 A-� �SFRUCE C-msl iin J� Design/Construction r�:. T'!GL'�.' RAZ /1 "--II Iy 'MI, RN ' y �cnro , • \ 1\. \EL- ARY, � Department: �`�...���� \\ oN, 'yinp-; , �F v. a Public Works Services j w ,\`);r2: 2 ----- Project Manager: , • Dean Rodia M p `--'---7-1 r r---r-r-----Tr Description: The replacement of thirsty high maintenance turf and vegetation with low water use landscaping that meets the need to conserve resources,reduce maintenance costs,while providing landscape alternatives to the surrounding community. Justification: The new landscaping wil reduce maintenance costs and water use requirements. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPOES SO 50 S0 $0 $0 50 SO Design/Plan Review 527,560 50 50 50 50 SO 527,560 Right-of-Way So S0 50 50 50 S0 $0 Construction SO $360,000 $0 $0 $0 SO $360,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $4,000 SO $D $0 50 $4,000 Contingency $0 $36,000 $0 $0 So 50 $36,000 Total Costs: $27,560 $400,000 50 50 $0 $0 $427,560 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL LMD 4R Terra Vista(134) $27,560 5400,000 SD So S0 50 $427,560 Total Costs: $27,560 $400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $427,560 Impact on Operations: There will be disruptions when the existing landscaping is removed and new landscaping installed. However, once completed,maintenance and irrigation costs will be much lower. Al gf ' !,_ ".. , ., f-.1.... ., ,,. h z 0\ -51,-... - 1 4 .i' II .� - .tear . ',.4..i.:■.1% •••' 1C1: i:.' -. '. • '2 "-•'''' ••• .i,S'• • •1••••...,..., 111P • I ■•• . 0. k•- Drainage fi : r' 4 ,, w.x. Drainage projects include the construction of new storm drains, storm drain lateral connections, flood control channels, catch basins, debris racks and other forms of infrastructure that protect the public right-of-way from hazards caused by flooding and severe weather events. Drainage projects are scheduled and planned due to the availability of funding, safety concerns, new development, and weather/emergency events. In extreme circumstances, inadequate drainage can prevent development from taking place. The City consults with many other agencies when constructing new drainage improvements, including utility companies, the Cucamonga Valley Water District, the San Bernardino Flood Control District and the Army Corps of Engineers, as needs dictate. Drainage projects are typically funded from Drainage Funds and eligible street funding sources such as Measure I or Gas Tax. Project List& FY 2014-15 Expenditures Sources of Funding for FY 2014-15 I. Pacific Electric Trail at Victoria Park $35.000 $35.000 Lane—Drainage Improvements Total $35,000 ( . 4 ■---______--- riGeneral Drainage B Project Number: JL Key: 1874 Object: Pacific Electric Trail at Victoria Park Lane- Drainage Improvement Project Location: -_,j 15—"r U ( '_.I•11___ / `' I L J I I Pacific Electric Trail at Victoria `\ v —�— ��� �"-1 Park Lan \II 1l g Lane . y �.)�y.ry I_ P L.C„IC ELECTRIC TRAI �t t I/,__, [�E [ — I-a—.- FICt Si TIO lj I I Est.Construction Start/End: �l1 ` 'i 1 ,s� `J\ 10/2014-11/2019 —,�`„^Ir�r — ' ��++I/1f ' t ���, " Project Status: Yµ� 1 I \ \ter ` t`. Design _i 1 I t. PROJECT LOCATION<i Department: �- -1 ��a--- i it Engineering — c ..� e uae an Project Manager: I - '`\ i3 = Walt Stickney fl I ° — Description: Drainage improvement along the Pacific Electric Trail at Victoria Park Lane. Justification: Currently when it rains erosion occurs along the trail and the slope at Victoria Park Lane. The drainage improvement will pick-up the flows and divert them to a storm drain and eliminating the erosion. Project Cost Estimate(5): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES S0 SO 50 50 50 50 5D Design/Plan Review 50 53,500 50 50 50 50 $3,500 Right-of-Way 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Construction 50 $27,000 $0 So $0 50 $27,000 Inspection&Administration 50 51,800 50 50 50 50 $1,800 Contingency 50 52,700 50 $0 So So S2,700 Total Costs: 50 535,000 50 50 50 $0 $35,000 Project funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL General Drainage(112) 50 535,000 S0 50 50 50 535,000 Total Costs: 50 535,000 50 50 50 50 $35,000 Impact on Operations: Elimination of the drainage flows will eliminate the costs for placing sand bags and cleanup, and freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other areas. 81 • R„• -.n IF.�, alr-, `t 1 111_._„ ' . ,- _... si x • r, ., _, _a_.t.,,o.. . . t Facilities =nt_ Projects that construct new buildings or that either improve, add on to, or renovate existing buildings and ancillary structures are typically classified as Facilities Projects. These projects ultimately result in new structures being added to the City's fixed facility inventory; however, some projects placed in this category are considered capital rehabilitation as they focus on the remodeling or restoration of existing facilities. The majority of these projects are funded via City Reserve funds. Major projects may qualify for state, federal 1 tY P 1 tY 1 P 1 Y 9 fY and/or grant funding. Typical operating eratin g expenses for facilities include increases in staffing, building and systems maintenance costs, overhead expenses and utilities. Project List& FY 2014-15 Expenditures Sources of Funding for FY 2014-15 sso,co0 I.City Facilities-Roofing Survey $45,000 $220,000 2. Civic Center-Landscape Renova- $240,000 tion 3. Civic Center-Prkg and Exterior $140,000 sioo,000 Lighting $5.000 4. Civic Center-Roof System Resto- $780,000 s3o.oco - ration/Patio Replacement • 5. Cultural Arts Center-Exterior $25,000 Joint Re - 1 airs p 6. Fire District-Jersey Station 174 $50,000 $1,270.000 Training Facility 7. Paul A Biane Library-2nd Floor $220,000 Rancho KIDS Project 0 Capital Reserves El Fire Capital Projects 8. Public Safety Building-HVAC IAQ $100,000 9. Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports $30,000 ■Library Capital Fund E]CFD 2003-01 Cultural Ctr Ctr—Relocation 10.Victoria Gardens Cultural Ctr- $20,000 ■Park Development Courtyard Redesign I I.Victoria Gardens Cultural Ctr- $25,000 ■Law Enforcement Reserve Loading Bay Total $1,675,000 C Project Number: Jl Key: Object: 5300 City Facilities- Roofing Survey • Project Location: r'-1 tr- All City facilities except City Hall -!1+p.. _ s I, and City Yard Building ::;11p-al in= , :I + _ ��' I Imay : v erd ,,,E rnw �- I51;.fc.�a 1 Al ' Lz;„}, a—i3 = �� �g'/}a nlee, �L ILL Ic%i �..� . ?4: •rw V 5++�}° iw..,, c i 1' _, "fix F�G� ILL. t` i' ) RlnnOf :# �� '��F tmm 3zrrF L ` + s Est.Construction Start/End: ' Ii "t -'rum y ys 'a'L I „ a5�_ y.�-# �Q 10— July 2014-June 2015 'a 1.�- i ARilop,,�`�O I�'f 9 -t-3 - 4 ��l l 11 to ivy. rYw rh "� �1, � niiROUG�iQ3 1THE c TY -� t Project Status: r IP 2-t,,-.76:..-.-1-C'.)ti, ,u,' art ` •r e,, a Design �!I(f lr7 a lriXf � LI:: r' `,� `. t''` si•-/ r 0..-- --.'QP9 _4 .2- `yam., tie., f :a.,,_ Department: Tom' r i=-i<=�I:frT ,:l_ F:� .1.-t r`=i /.r Public Works Services e-rg +es1..�0. .w $ , I i I Nrns� nil T"' . --I •--, Project Manager: •�, I le: �'I -ti. : .,,s.,- TyQuaintance - Ikr' T K+ n Description: Select consultant to evaluate the existing roof systems at most City facilities. Consultant will prepare a report outlining current conditions of each facility roof,list deficiencies and recommend solutions along with a maintenance plan as well as prepare bid specifications. Justification: The City is preparing a program to bring all City facilities into compliance with the requirements of the Title 24 building Efficiency Standards. Cool roof,which saves both money and energy became a part of Title 24 in October 2005. In addition,there is a need to develop an accurate assessment of the existing roof systems to allow for proper budget forecasting and management. Project Cost Estimate(5): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 S0 $0 $0 SO Design/Plan Review $0 $45,000 SO $0 $0 $0 $45,000 Right-of-Way So $0 So $O So So So Construction $0 $0 50 $0 $0 SO $0 Inspection&Administration SO 50 5o 50 SO 50 So Contingency 50 So $0 $o So so 50 Total Costs: SO $45,000 50 SD $0 50 $45,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Captial Reserve(025) 50 $45,000 50 $o $O $o $45,000 Total Costs: So 545,000 50 S0 $0 $0 $45,000 Impact on Operations: No impact on operations while facilities are being evaluated. However,once all City facilities have met the Title 24 Cool Roof requirements,the facilities heating costs will be reduced significantly. Because these roofs are comprised of a highly reflective and emissive roofing material, cool roofs are on average SO to 60 degrees cooler than an average roof. Cl Project Number; JL Key: Object: 5607 Civic Center-Landscape Renovation Project Location: —�:xeealoss '> \` -� / . Civic Center il reE,.�� �_. I U41M V "GORni KErSTp At_!TGHLC i"'--� Est.Construction Start/End: (��} ;Q �{ ��,...--vl- July2014—June 2015 ('—�� }\ - -- i 2 arTY MALL UEVfi.Y_ST� � LOL EpTTAl10N '�.i Project Status: �.: —w—iENIEN.. R—\ �%f Design/Construction .�� s\ iY PROJECT LOCATIO , Department: I ^• c ELI I'F[L OK i _ Public Works Services i [4::: Project Manages if I ARROW al [ I (-Pr 1 1 Dean Rodia SL�t,� I • Description: The design and replacement of thirsty,high maintenance turf&vegetation with low water use landscaping that meets the need to conserve resources and reduce maintenance costs,while providing landscaping alternatives to the surrounding community. Justification: The new landscaping will significantly reduce maintenance costs and water use requirements along with establishing a landscape conservation show piece for the community and future development. Work will start at perimeter and turf areas. Project Cost Estimate(5): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES so 50 $0 $0 50 50 50 Design/Plan Review $19,730 540,000 $0 $0 S0 SO 559,730 Right-of-Way $0 SO SO SO $0 SO $0 Construction 50 $180,000 $17 $0 $0 50 $180,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $2,000 SO $0 So So 52,000 Contingency SO $18,000 $0 50 50 SO 518,000 Total Costs: $19,730 5240,000 So 50 50 S0 5259,730 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 . 2018/19 TOTAL Capital Reserve(025) $19,730 $240,000 50 $0 $0 50 5259,730 Total Costs: $19,730 $240,000 $0 $0 SO 50 $259,730 Impact on Operations: There will be disruptions when the existing landscaping is removed and new landscaping installed. However,once completed,maintenance and irrigation costs will be much lower. C2 • Project Number: JL Key: Object:5607 Civic Center- Parking and Exterior Lighting Project Location: 3 I =_Agrrirxcnr '^ Civic Center ® � l �' —. 1 ^ IVVry I —H<aoza�eF:.s g IQ a�Tabr.c.r� igi Est.Construction Start/End: ;'a S j am— - J 2015 x '\1\\ l � CITY HALL `J/// <—r evnios.t•'-; , 4w:4 smnoH � Project Status: 2 _.azlevmg c /` Design in FY13/14 __jr I.T.L,RV�.wnr \ v 1, Const in FY 14/15 — PROJECT LOCATIO ''\\/f� Department: Cr„,'u nn Public Works Services a Project Manager: �y I I ARaow It I' Ty c2uaintance ���I,in ,nuns u� ' I i Description: Replace the existing City Hall parking lot light fixtures with solar powered LED lighting fixtures. There will also be an additive bid for replacing the landscaping lighting. Justification: Currently,there are forty eight(48)-250 watt HPS lighting fixtures in the City Hall parking lots. These fixtures total twelve thousand (12,000)watts, The new 140 watt LED fixtues require only six thousand seven hundred(6,700)watts. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 50 So $0 $0 $0 50 Design/Plan Review $30,000 50 50 50 $0 $0 $30,000 Right-of-way $0 SO $0 50 So 50 $0 Construction 50 $140,000 $0 $0 SO SO 5140,000 Inspection&Administration $0 50 $0 S0 S0 SO So Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO $0 Total Costs: $30,000 $140,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $170,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Captial Reserve(025) 530,000 $140,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $170,000 Total Costs: $30,000 $140,000 SO $0 $0 $0 $170,000 Impact on Operations: Minimal-There will be some temporary parking restrictions while lighting fixtures are being removed and replaced. The new fixtures will require less electricity and have a longer service life so both maintenance and utility costs will be reduced. C3 Project Number: 1L Key: 1892 Object: Civic Center-Roof System Restoration and Patio Replacement Project Location: 1 I ,s`_scrIeTs:.—'d Civic Center ® `- >s' \ _ — a ci rr µqF<rpJr- (irizowontirvi=-2-, l Est.Construction Start(End: tr ` ' - July2014-June 2015 //� Q g :? CITY naLL q_rd!Os,SCUD RSOLICC STATION 7 • Project Status: i '~T '.CIvlc.cen TeF_r Phase l in FY13/14 = <<a�,«ao.��� � �% Phase 2 in FY14/15 1= PROJECT LOCATIO Department: el ecAru, I7 Public.Works Services Pt Project Manager: I> r r ARa t ow tt Ty Quaintance H L IsP -1,I J S Description: Roof Restoration(phase 1)-install Title 24 Compliant&Energy Star compliant high-build white reflective roof coating and flashing. Patio Replacement(phase 2)-remove&replace patio surface and waterproofing system. Justification: Roof Restoration(phase 1)will make the City Hall roof compliant with the new Title 24 Cool Roof requirements.Patio Replacement (phase 2)will seal all penetrations and joints to prevent water intrusion. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 SO $0 $0 $0 SO 50 Design/Plan Review 530,000 $0 SO $0 SO $0 $30,000 Right-cf-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO $0 Construction $220,000 $780,000 50 50 $0 50 $1,000,000 Inspection&Administration 520,000 $0 $0 $0 S0 $0 $20,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Costs: $270,000 5780,000 50 50 $0 $0 $1,050,000 Project Funding: . Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Captial Reserve(025) 5270,000 $780,000 S0 $0 $0 50 $1,050,000 Total Costs: $270,000 5780,000 50 50 50 50 $1,050,000 Impact on Operations: Minimal-work will occur when City Hall is closed. Contractor to start work at 7:00 pm and be off site by 6:00 am. Except Wednesday nights(City Council and Planning Commission meetings)when the contractor cannot start work until 11:30 pm. Patio demolition will occur during weekend. C4 Project Number: JL Key: 1890 Object: Cultural Arts Center- Exterior Joint Repairs Project Location: J 1 Io—✓ i o �t �// I" o Lw Victoria Gardens Cultural Center \ rr'"`JJJ(JJJlll(III' I� i(uv=N�gr=g'`�r v+n. !IUrssc`wAY a !� a MIMI V alrC-TV ARDENS EHM1Ltt-U!.- l ------------.- LLL 1 VICTORIA ADENS CULR RAL CENTER s PAUt"IBIANE 13 .kY• ill I I III u_!I I /,/Ji� Est.Construction Start/End: - - �, NP,RTI*r.I IJ•S}RL La /.-''r.• July 2014—June 2015 yI ;', Project Status: of / - %, Construction a < % t PRUOUJECT.LOCATION C�420!/ —fYERVILS,— V.ERSAI--ES•5� =1�-1=YLksAi LuL5Y:TI� jj��Department: Public Works Services VIG-TORIAZaAgp ENS-L r /A Project Manager: p ��r) �,- . Ty Ouaintance m l c z;\ ,//7 • Description: Select a consultant to evaluate the existing condition of the exterior elastomeric joint seals and expansion joints. The consultant will then prepare bid specifications and an engineer's estimate for the needed repairs. Justification: The seals and joints are showing signs of failure due to weathering. Project Cost Estimate(5): Exoenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPOES 50 $0 50 50 50 $0 SO Design/Plan Review 525,000 525,000 $0 50 50 50 550,000 Right-of-Way 50 $0 50 50 50 50 50 Construction 50 50 $0 50 50 50 50 Inspection&Administration 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Contingency 50 50 $0 50 50 50 50 Total Costs: $25,000 $25,000 $0 5o S0 S0 $50,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Captial Reserve(025) $25,000 $25,000 50 $0 50 50 550,000 Total Costs: $25,000 $25,000 SO 50 S0 S0 $50,000 Impact on Operations: None-Victoria Gardens Cultural Center will remain fully operational while consultant performs evaluation. C5 Project Number: IL Key: 1735 Object: Fire District-Jersey Station (174)Training Facility Project Location: FuiuiNTe I c_r_C J a Behind Jersey Fire Station (174) a V i and the Fire Maintenance Facility i I �i II ; �- on Jersey Blvd. ® E a Jgrtssvl ecvo FIRE-sSgn(I7 -��/ o I rio Li ',/7/ e // 'err-1u .METROLnNK-5 ATl0j�� �c.'41 a w 114.:,)) ill =ACACIAS W S'1 Est.Construction Start/End: ,> �I I ng,vnuoR 2015/16 -2016/17 Jai o I.—' -T-iM:S.T'=� =Er.1PIRH LA LAKES COU Si I / 2 ti Li N:SdGQ �y- Project Status: PROJEC LO AYION N. Design i 1 II a w y to _-C )Department: Y Fire Protection District 11 2 Ervin E LAKES GOLF COURSE g ' a a Project Manager: aAxr,'sT1 f\ J// i ,4 Chief Cloughesy/Pamela Pane --J�/Il JnI tD5510NV1 STA-CR m Description: Architect approved by the Fire Board on December 18,2013,for Phase 1 of the Architectural Design Services. Justification: A training facility has been included in the current and previous Strategic Plan and has been part of the Jersey Station Master Plan since its inception. Several multi-story hotels have been constructed and additional mid-rise professional officesare proposed In the future necessitating this training tower. It will Include expanded classrooms, a live burn building, multi-story training building and other props. Project cost Estimate(5): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 SO 50 $0 50 S0 50 Design/Plan Review $777,920 $50,000 so 50 So S0 $527,920 Right-of-way 50 S0 $0 $0 S0 50 SO Construction SO 50 $15.000,000 50 50 $0 $15,000,000 Inspection&Administration S0 SO 50 SO 50 50 $0 Contingency SD S0 50 $0 $0 So 50 Total Costs: 5777,920 550,000 515,000,000 50 S0 S0 $15,827,920 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Fire Capital Projects(288) $777,920 550,000 515,000,000 S0 $0 SO $15,827,920 Total Costs: $777,920 $50,000 $15,000,000 So $0 $0 $15,827,920 Impact on Operations: Fire District operations and maintenance cost will increase. The cost will be better determined after the design phase is complete. Opportunities may exist for regional partnerships that could help effect operational costs. C6 Project Number: IL Key: 1867 Object: Paul A. Biane Library-Second Floor Rancho KIDS Project Project Location: - -L 1 I C�J V I {1 12505 Cultural Center Drive _ ®l'—� - Jm rat./�., to `2 (,- vLN R,.r L lit;II LIP�RAL- ELrpol C c � _, �z PAVII INANE L•RARYF III ' 4;r: ■ rte^ 4,V1HrttAL LT LL I, u �Y/ Est.Construction Start/End: FY 2014/15 to complete design a I .5, /i drawings and establish rct A1'-"'x'"'"meEi / :`�`� W J , !j construction cost estimates. r g n 1 IJl ////.,7 j' u 5RSA,LLEss;_--L'_ —.,,nli ,,1ECT2.LOCATION,n., A ' '`%% ; Prolect Status: /-�%::2' Design VIGTOIf1AZ,A nfiF.Ntj-LN / o Department: s n a, ;;;�Library z / -- 71.-.3�j I lc( / ,if Wl °. I � Project Manager: Robert Karatsu Description: Rancho KIDS is a project that will build out the second floor of the Paul A. Biane Library at Victoria Gardens, Rancho KIDS is envisioned as an interactive children's museum combined with traditional library services to create a new type of learning experience. Design and cost estimates of the second floor has been established as a City Council goal for FY 2014-15. Justification: Demand for library services in the community continues to increase,particularly for the ages 0-7. Rancho KIDS is being designed to provide a new,unique service model that will combine the features of interactive children's museum exhibits with traditional library services. Rancho KIDS should also be a regional draw that will provide additional visitors to bath the Victoria Gardens Shopping District and the Lewis Family Playhouse, Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 201.7/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 S0 $0 50 S0 SO $0 Design/Plan Review 590,000 $200,000 $750,000 50 50 50 $1,040,000 Right-of-Way $0 So S0 50 $0 50 50 Construction $0 $0 $2,500,000 $3,500,000 S0 $0 $6,000,000 Inspection&Administration 50 $o $0 50 50 S0 50 Contingency S0 $20,000 $0 5300,000 $0 SO $320,000 Total Costs: $90,000 5220,000 $3,250,000 $3,800,000 $0 So $7,360,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Library Services Fund(329) $90,000 $220,000 53,250,000 $3,800,000 50 50 57,360,000 Total Costs: $90,000 $220,000 $3,250,000 $3,800,000 $0 $0 $7,360,000 Impact on Operations: Feasibility study projects an approximate 5300,000 per year cost for operations and maintenance. (The project is designed to be revenue-generating.) C7 Project Number: It Key: 1893 Object: Public Safety Building-HVAC IAQ Project Location: l —LAN:Komtcrr Public Safety Building `® 2RES✓5si / , —J _ `�� 104rry �,Stl �'4-0v;.giKF srp 1041-G:4hLcrI,, Est.Construction Start/End: x -2i July 2014—June 2015 11---1 2, `1 city HALL \ ��O[\YK[ IOOLICe STATION � � Project Status: 8' —,_'___crvicceH,eq N �,- rMAI.Ann,LwAI Construction x -\\ PROJECT LOCATIO ``\\,✓ Department: \// �- �os,HU.rtAnn i �f �Ar Public Works Services cl w Project Manager: ----^_'_ l ANCUN if 0 Is� ( Ty Qua intance C1 -L.- sbi-n"crs�i < Description: Mechanical design and specifications for altering Air Handlers 1 and 2 which are located in the Public Safety building. • Justification: The intake and exhaust systems of Air Handlers l and 2 need to be redone to meet current standards. Project Cost Estimate(5): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPOES $0 50 SO 5o 50 50 5o Design/Plan Review $70,000 $0 50 50 50 50 570,000 Right-of-Way S0 5o $0 so SO $0 $0 Construction $0 $100,000 $0 $0 So SO $100,000 Inspection&Administration 50 50 $0 $0 SO 50 SO Contingency $0 SO 50 $0 $0 $0 SO Total Costs: $70000 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $170,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Law Enforcement Reserve(017) $70,000 $100,000 $0 So $0 $0 $170,000 Total Costs: 570,000 $100,000 SO $o $0 $0 $170,000 Impact on Operations: None C8 Project Number: IL Key: 1896 Object: Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center-Relocation Project Location: r I �'-----^ , Analyzing various locations ! Lr ��jj �, L.r.� �t�� 5'.1c �a ,. FAO 1� -L- �l 4 F its:'i� 1 x#III ti. - 'H e D-- 'r cs e s` 1< i g e, ,-t err Est.Design Start/End: t\ w" tnmr' '}^A e h !- : 3 r x trrte " 't: zia 8/2014-2/2015 _i� r !. ate_.-y � ' i 7+w -��3sc �. vs ° r,''E E ' VA6tIQys LOCATYO�IS j Project Status: �"a' F"' ti,l i. e -t_)_ ssr rraj L ( ;`).?1::THIR0UGHOyT;THE CITY Design I. z,ce .. ii 2 y.il. _ Yj 1 f 4' P?--1 r �` ; r t r - s n _ J----F - nr _ I T` 7i Department: �-r l(i°nr.- --4-;.:1 i i, • J;s re Community Services/Parks 7,,,s„, 0�, rrP r.- i t J ^_ . Project Manager: k F �� t11 `'—°""i' Nettie Nielsen I!_, . i1' �,r__,.",,. _--I Description: This project will provide the analysis and conceptual design for relocation of the existing Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center. Justification: Need to relocate existing facility and programs due to loss of existing building use. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES SO 50 50 $0 $0 So $0 Design/Plan Review $20,000 $30,000 $0 $0 50 $o $50,000 Right-of-Way $0 S0 50 50 $0 $0 $0 Construction 50 SO $0 $0 SO 50 SO Inspection&Administration 50 50 $0 50 50 So SO Contingency SO So $0 SO $0 $O $0 Total Costs: $20,000 $30,000 SO 50 50 50 $50,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Park Development(120) 520,000 $30,000 50 50 SO 50 550,000 Total Costs: $20,000 $30,000 50 50 50 S0 $50,000 Impact on Operations: This project will ultimately require maintenance of a new facility,as well as new landscape and irrigation. • C9 Project Number: JL Key: 1894 Object: Victoria Gardens Cultural Center-Courtyard Redesign Project Location: :7 1 ' I 9_--/ )'z. v k-7., �� ¢ {I AV 12505 Cultural Center Drive _ ' c e R ` ` Lvtn-ac Stv mom,-V� �q, --L ii JI ¢ > 06:1-NoNSV_W_ti" Q I o / n ^-- -� J i - �� .“ VICTORIA GARDENS CULTURAL CENTER „...201Y---- I PAU!eIANELit .RY I !i : It / / ----Est.Design Start/End: N9RTMLAIM1'TR LL9 i/%/12/2019-6/201s j � iT 4;,4 I SQU i1-1JAgINSiFEET a -Project Status: I! 1 / i;�c Li DP51gn 5 PROJECT LOCATION vERSAtL ESST---§ l4 v, UI /;;�/ "--chtfivis `= L.Department: ���/,i Community Services/Parks // //%li fi//VIG-TGRI rGARr3FNS-�i-l-..-1 �7 Project Manager: J r Nettie Nielsen m 1 / / % . //// Description: This project will be done in conjunction with Victoria Gardens to develop a design for the Cultural Center Courtyard. Justification: Provide enhancements to the existing courtyard to make the space more inviting for the public and rental opportunities. Project Cost Estimate(5): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 SO $0 $0 50 $0 50 Design/Plan Review $0 520,000 50 $0 50 50 520,000 Right-of-Way 50 50 50 $0 $0 SO 50 Construction SO $0 50 50 50 50 50 Inspection&Administration $0 50 SO SO SO 50 50 Contingency 50 SO SO 50 $0 50 50 Total Costs: SO $20,000 SO 50 $0 50 520,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Capital Reserve(025) $0 $15,000 SO SO So SO $15,000 CFD 2003-01 Cultural Center(615) 50 $5,000 SO 50 50 SO $5,000 Total Costs: $0 $20,000 $0 50 $0 $0 $20,000 Impact on Operations: This project will ultimately require additional maintenance as well as new landscape and irrigation. C 10 Project Number: 1L Key: 1895 Object: Victoria Gardens Cultural Center-Loading Bay Project Location: �1 ' I a—" J y ' ea /.0 a ll 12505 Cultural Center Drive ® a a~`�E.^.ve, I �'- J uvtls:l,sfs1 cs ' L m \r \l 11 k5P WnN o II Jill{JJJ` z a L-TURRL FR pit; �+'{6/ VICTOI: :CARD Ns CULT RAL CE TER 1 ( ' S• 5 1 DIANE L• RY• I� 'i I /, /V w I /.�� Est.Construction Start End: N.- / i r.�r ']R4FPNA1 '-TRlbl lunknown �i J - - ~- / j I. fLtltL.fINSilBE E T?�-��. U./Project Status: rc---Design PRJECT!L'OCATION LL p UI .A;, ,/ avl sJm0'da-¢�VLNSAIL•L•LrsT' /' "/ CMERwes Community �� j /� /j%y Community Services/Parks � / A DxN -N ��,/ Project Manager: Nettle Nielsen / ✓ a ;% Description: This project involves the design to cover the Service/Loading Bay at Victoria Gardens Cultural Center. Justification: Project will provide covered area for theater construction projects. Project Cost Estimate 1$): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES SO $0 50 50 50 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review 50 515,000 SO 50 50 $0 525,000 Right-of-Way 50 s0 So 50 S0 50 SO Construction SO 50 S0 50 50 50 SO Inspection&Administration 50 SO 50 50 5o 50 50 Contingency $0 50 50 50 50 50 50 Total Costs: 50 525,000 50 50 50 SO 525,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Capital Reserve 1025) 50 525,000 SO 50 S0 50 $25,000 Total Costs: $o 525,000 50 50 50 SO $25,000 Impact on Operations: Improvements will require maintenance of the structure and added light fixtures,as well as minimal electric cost for light useagc. C1t ' G . •"18,2013 Miscellaneous Miscellaneous projects are the capital undertakings that do not qualify for classification into the other project categories. These are often one-time projects that are prompted by factors such as: - State or Federal Mandates - Community Health and Safety Issues - Council Goals and Priorities - Regional Needs Assessments - Interagency Agreements - External Funding Arrangements These projects may or may not have maintenance obligations and they are typically funded from a variety of special funding sources; they are rarely funded via the General Fund. Project List& FY 2014-15 Expenditures Sources of Funding for FY 2014-15 I.Arrow Rte Utility Underground- $1,000 Bear Gulch to W/O Archibald $100,000 2. Base Line Rd Utility Underground- $554,570 Carnelian St to Vineyard Ave $74,600 $555,570 3. Bus Stop Pads at Various $93,240 Locations 4. Illuminated Street Name Sign $100,000 $18,640 Upgrade $748,810 4111 ❑Underground Utilities ■Measure"I" ■Ped Grant Article 3 ■Gas Tax D Project Number: 800-2010-12 JL Key: 1777 Object: Arrow Route Utility Underground- Bear Gulch to West of Archibald Avenue Project Location: , ly ,I,�_-..__I:N j Arrow Route from Bear Gulch to jL� west of Archibald Avenue FOOTHILL BLVD TIMBFRI INF I N i �� PROJECT LOCATIO 1 liflillif t j Est.Construction Start/End: � j 6/2016-1/2017 ;i = rj-� E BEAR GULCH :,Project Status: ELEMENTARY "Design T BEA' ... - i Department: I - _ ".Ai. - .-.., tar>.aaa ixm: .me Engineering �— I Jar Project Manager: Walt Stickney f III 4�� -,___�1` Description: This project will underground a stretch of existing overhead utilities along Arrow Route from Bear Gulch to west of Archibald Avenue. Justification: The removal of the overhead utilities,by placing them underground,improves the aesthetic appearance of the area. Project Cost Estimate(5): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 50 $0 $0 50 SO SO Design/Plan Review $0 $1,000 $15,000 S0 $0 S0 $16,000 Right-of-way $0 $0 $0 S0 50 So SO Construction $0 $0 $626,690 $0 $0 $0 $626,690 Inspection&Administration $0 $0 515,000 50 $0 S0 $15,000 Contingency $0 50 $52,670 50 $0 $0 562,670 Total Costs: 50 51,000 $719,360 $0 $0 $0 $720,360 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Underground Utilities(129) 50 $1,000 $719,360 $0 50 50 5720,360 Total Costs: SO $1,000 $719,360 $0 $0 $0 5720,360 Impact on Operations: None • D1 Project Number: 800-2010-13 JL Key: 1776 Object: Base Line Road Utility Underground - Carnelian Street to Vineyard Avenue Project Location: A` ` J—I . ,'2mE,r i' (re,1,41.7,4,7 Y !I U R IL IILIL Line Road from Carnelian >n - x, A Street to Vineyard Avenue EL EMCMT h -a_ (G a2-- - I a , I) _ M I i.0 J G ,t , -17 inn I 1 ( __ Est.Construction Start/End: L `; xs. r 6/2015 1/2018 Iq ,. 11 I- I L+.<e ea cxe 71.7.”' r. I 1IA sr RPROJECT LOCATION-- �� j J Project Status: =S \\ F p, Construction I ri. �1. _p'I ~J ° 1 -7/ -I I I=IF�741 0OMMU ARK _. //l/ / F- 4 i (r ss II TM I £ ' �Department: 555E '09§4 ra I L,,,,,-,. Engineering ') � �- 11 �,„,„,� � � � e %.� ��� � L57 c. L,.AM i , no I -r tEyr° �, 4,4 s ■Project Manager. 1e // r v.`i ' \ j : cnmar ��L�r./// I eJ �If e vis,A 7 r Walt Stickney // 7 ( G.cMenrnm - Descr iption: This project will underground a stretch of existing overhead utilities along Base Line Road from Carnelian Street to Vineyard Avenue. • Justification: The removal of the overhead utilities,by placing them underground,improves the aesthetic appearance of the area. Project Cost Estimate($1: Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/10 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $o $0 50 $o so so Design/Plan Review $0 $10,000 50 SO 50 $0 $10,000 Right-of-Way S0 50 50 SO 50 50 50 Construction S0 $481,420 so $0 SO $0 5481,420 Inspection&Administration SO $15,000 $0 so 50 50 $15,000 Contingency $0 $48,150 $0 $0 SO 50 $48,150 Total Costs: SO $554,570 $0 $0 $o So $554,570 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Underground Utilities(129) S0 $554,570 ' $o $0 50 $0 5554,570 Total Costs: SO 5554,570 50 50 50 50 $554,570 Impact on Operations: None D2 Project Number: 800-2014-07 JL Key: 1823 Object. Bus Stop Pads at Various Locations Project Location: 7--11-P-_ t}.' I s; ttr - L _g-+L si l V :7 Various locations throughout the I ( I I i ` ,;.. TI---�„I riti" s City including stops on Haven ® IT T-, 1 61 l.._.' J.7 7 .r f o. . t 1 Avenue, Milliken Avenue, Foothill - "c -s r Boulevard, Baseline Road, 4th E , 1 ' s j r S r i t—' . - /`6- Street and Carnelian Street 1 hJ I tor / tt ;_ PROJECT LOCATIONS fir{ 1 11 7 .ct .,Y to 1 - - „_ Est.Construction Start End: .2L 'r' f _ r 01/2015-02/2015 / ' r kJ !i r ti v2. JI I I. L, " 1 a.-4..).-4:1` x • i' - ^'^ I '.—�' rT �-aj J J 7 -F .-{ .�t Project Status: Design 't r .t ,..,-.:2;;T:218)::- a s -- I .4 ,T;,' ' Department: ;L. r y' y I !1 x i f ¢..,.i...., —1 '!--.. 3 _ ,, ..—_._.__!.. ..- Engineering .l r i r i `1 R �j3j '1/4',2,.. .. fi qt'-2-J 1-- 7 t S Project Manager: i i - ! i Curt Billings i _.- , y_ ,.•..• } —7 .j, i . Description: Constructs 22 bus pads at various locations throughout the City. Justification: Provides ADA Improvements to existing public transportation stops that are currently used by over 300 riders each day.The improvements may increase ADA ridership,resulting in less vehicle trips and reduced CO2 emissions. Project Cost Estimate(5): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES SO 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 SO So So Right-of-Way SO S0 50 50 SO 50 $0 Construction SO $84,000 SO SO $0 $0 $84,000 Inspection&Administration 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO S0 Contingency SO $9,240 $0 50 50 SO $9,240 Total Costs: $0 $93,240 50 SO SO SO $93,240 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund(174) 50 $18,640 $O 50 $o $0 $18,640 Ped Grant/Art3 Fund(214) 50 $74,600 $0 $0 50 50 574,600 Total Costs: $0 $92,210 $0 $0 $0 $0 $93,240 Impact on Operations: None • D3 Project Number: JL Key: 1693 Object: Illuminated Street Name Sign Upgrade Project Location: r � r ' �J t r _-- �Foothill Boulevard m ^ -� r a may , JI lY� I — i::13c I ` a il I y �ff-$ , ,..".4„,S 51 Pit J cfLOCATIO 4 :. I •i� 1 II f j _ ' 11 � �, - IL = Est.Construction Start/End: - it J i _ I –_1 71 July 2014–June 2015 — I ,� J If/ �� �N-'ll 'i it Project Status: _� —1 - `;I `9 Construction i., V r- t bi m Department: _ ` i Public Works Services —_Ii_ )i; c 1 ;; n 41 Project Manager: ?rl (' II , U �� Ernest Ruiz f"" .._,_y • Description: Project consists of replacing damaged signs and/ar individual sign panels and relocation of existing illuminated street name signs from a mast arm mounting to a wind resistant horizontal davit arm mounting. Justification: This project meets the City Council goal to promote energy efficiency by continuing to retrofit the illuminated street name signs with more energy efficient LED lighting. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES S0 SO S0 So S0 50 50 Design/Plan Review SO 50 S0 SO SO SO $0 Right-of-Way 50 SO $0 50 50 50 50 Construction SO 591,000 50 $0 S0 SO $91,00() Inspection&Administration $0 50 $0 50 SO $0 $0 Contingency SO $9,000 50 50 50 50 $9,000 Total Costs: 50 5100,000 50 $0 So $0 $100,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Gas Tax(170) 50 5100,000 S0 So So $o $100,000 Total Costs: SO 5100,000 50 50 SO So 5100,000 Impact on Operations: There will be minor disruptions to traffic when the illuminated street name signs are being replaced. Maintenance costs will go down because the new LED lights are more energy efficient and have a longer service life. D4 ffr "'ill . ut/.- OM rm.IN .trcrP as•rw• • 1111• • -..s A..r.,! Municipal Utility The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (RCMU) was formed by the City Council in 2001. RCMU served its first customers in 2003 and finished construction of the Victoria Arbors substa- tion in 2004. Currently, RCMU services over 500 customers in its service area. Annually, more than 73,000 megawatt-hours of electricity are distributed to our customers via 20 circuit miles of wire spread across the roughly 4-square miles of service territory. RCMU's historical peak demand is 17.5 megawatts, set in August 201 1. RCMU capital projects are related to the maintenance, expansion and improvement of the RCMU distribution system. RCMU's distribution system was designed to minimize maintenance and operating costs and ensure maximum reliability of service. Project List& FY 2014-15 Expenditures Sources of Funding for FY 2014-15 I. Haven Ave., 6th St.to 8th St.— $461,000 Electric Line Extension Total $461,000 $461,000 ❑ Municipal Utility(705) E Project Number: JL Key: 1883 Obect: Haven Avenue Electric Line Extension from 6th Street to 8th Street Project Location: —° 11r,_o `--' 01x— I 11 Haven Avenue Electric Line C 'IGAa II y Lr- Extension from 6th Street to 8th ® agiD� 1—w —s— JERSEYI_BCV.D Street iw...HARK 7-aTa�sLi=a 1 -,,_—I fWldR O1T'AVE JS-T=— I _ �-,r 1 r 'METROLINK- ""�-8th'St—' INDIANi1CT {{ Q; > '� F-. L Q I`\ Esc Construction Start/End: I =Arn-r lA-sTJ 13 May 2014? ( ;�' i a f _. i z J I F F EtrtP IRE\KES GOLF CO Project Status: w > I`I( Design as 'a j rct A LI!S•%4% ,•,jh Engineering l 21 6ttlSt�PROJECT LOCATION i Project Manager: LL Fred Lyn $ r ' EMPI I E LAKES GOLF COW rres „ ' q Description: Distribution Line Extension south of 8th Street to service vacant parcels with RCMU electricity. Justification: Line extension is needed to extend power service to two vacant parcels south of 8th Street(South of 7th/North of Cola Cola Plant and corner of 6th Street and Haven Avenue). Once lines are extended,RCMU will also have accessibility to run lines South to the corner of Haven Avenue and 4th Street to service the large vacant parcel(Phase 2). The City paid SCE exit fees for the right to service any load associated with a newly constructed facility or undeveloped parcel that has never been interconnected with Edison; this falls under that category. Project Cost Estimate(5): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES - $0 $0 $0 50 SO SO $o Design/Plan Review 510,000 $0 So 50 $0 $0 510,000 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $o So SO so Construction So $451,000 $0 $O $0 $0 $461,000 Inspection&Administration SO SO $O $0 $0 SO $0 Contingency S0 S0 So $0 SO SO so Total Costs: $10,000 $461,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $471,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Municipal Utllity!Fund 705) $10,o0O 5961,000 $0 So SO $0 $471,000 ' Total Costs: $10,000 5461,000 SO $0 $0 $0 54n,000 Impact on Operations: The increased electricity load will provide additional revenue to RCMU. • El fs 191 f 3 � v_. 10111_' ,0100 •-.ao ► � Qas*wog, { � � ,++ Parks • °c, Any capital project that is located in, on, or adjacent to a park or community center facility is classified as a Park Project.These include the construction of new park facilities, as well as the expansion or rehabilitation of existing park facilities. Improvements include playing fields, play ground equipment, park landscaping, other miscellaneous recreational amenities, restroom facilities and parking lot improvements. Many of these projects require ongoing maintenance, and all field rehabilitation projects and renovations are performed on an annual or bi-annual basis due to extensive wear from local league play. The majority of Park Projects are funded via the Park Development Fund (120), which is collected via residential development fees (i.e. new single family, town home, condo and senior housing). Some projects qualify for grants and Special District funds. Project List& FY 2014-15 Expenditures Sources of Funding for FY 2014-15 I. Central Park-Outdoor Improvements $50,000 2. Central Park Pavillion-Phase II $82,250 Improvements $212,420 3. Etiwanda Creek Park Sidewalk $250,000 rQ'� Improvements 4. Park Playground ADA and CPSC Im- $150,000 '. $392.250 provements 5. Park Playground Rubberized Surface $16,000 Maintenance 6. Park Playground Seat Wall $8,720 7. Southwest Cucamonga Park-New $283,500 $283,500 -•' Park 8. Various Parks within LMD 4-Ballfield $37,700 Fence and Curb Replacement ❑Park Development Total $878,170 ■Prop 84 State Grant ■LMD 4R F Project Number: iL Key: 1871 Object: Central Park -Outdoor Improvements Project Location: h ��c� r- / 1� -\� S) Cra�. 4 /RELAwID?<t�- ` ,^' 11200 Base Line Road / =4.4::(ris-,o ivartsre•*+q^/ �\s�� J� s Il f ". a ( .�. 4 11 11:Jw.((' l N/i P_l5 \Jlci rlSrao'E+Y-St,.\`'.' �c Y /1 'I(((v� a PROJECT\LOCATION - �'='`j f C""�`' ' a 2 '`rte_ \ .vim- n rn' J C V�iAllf EfUNiNi IYAV.���) •i p 11 a F,OIIt)MAf.1.G� I _ ,1 (� `� J� `��py�(j,4 SL lQ—'-: Est.Design Start/End: 1 J k_i raio 8/2014-12/2014 PA(. FIG ELECTRIC TRAIL krov r -- �Project Status:Design y/ NCICIAIIIC /A Department: t: 7 Community Services/Parks 7 RASE LINE RD Project Manager: 1�J( r{ �--^� If Nettie Nielsen • ..4 1= ) llteNo-n NG-11 y I( ffe14ViOIo7 1 Description: This design only project will provide the next phase of development for Central Park,north of the interior road,between the PE Trail and the Community Center. Included will be an area for outdoor fitness equipment for trail and resident's use at the park site,as well as potential parking and restroom facilities for both park and trail users. Justification: Responds to resident's requests for further improvements to Central Park. Project Cost Estimate I$I: Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 50 $0 50 50 So 50 Design/Plan Review 50 550,000 50 50 50 S0 550,000 Right-of-Way $0 50 50 50 50 50 $0 Construction SO 50 50 S0 50 SO 50 Inspection&Administration 50 50 50 So So 50 50 Contingency 50 $0 SO $0 S0 50 $0 Total Costs: $0 5s0,000 $0 50 so 50 $50,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Park Development(120) 50 $50,000 50 50 50 50 550,000 Total Costs: SO $50,000 SO $0 $0 So 550,000 Impact on Operations: Currently design only. This project,when constructed will require maintenance such as cleaning and replacing any damaged portions of the equipment,as wit as landscape irrigation and Maintenance as needed. F1 Project Number: JL Key: 1803 Object: Central Park- Pavillion Phase II Improvements Project Location: 1° laxs' (� Sl / ��--• _ n L- AR fF 45� �n'clAWni<F.ST� \` i_i 11200 Base Line Road i \Rn,yrASffi� J(+5,,1;;_sr( �.ygjr/ )\51 2 W� ss V ty.6/PHI 2 tNACfi \�mi ti. p`t5I`' i. s fa.ff ,, PROJECT, LOCATION_�;P;` �� = ° ° 1r/ S� /N ,„.y'y ,..c.--..,_______:__.- - f ? 0_ J z c f�'��<� =_�ionnnoNr wAVr^�`j j �VNI]MgMFI I 1 Est.Design Start/End: (� LJ ,-J l) t�-e tLr)e[5Y la=rnrm 8/2014 �(�/ ,C rAC =ro ELECTRIC TRAIL .:r uv:LwuR / r �--, i Project Status: - /�” I z t 0 Design/Construction y r ` _, i RANCHO CUCAMONGA CENTRA/ K/R , t Department: 3 Community Services/Parks % j—__ BASE LINE RD Project Manager: ��J( ((}'�(1 (� 1 Nettie Nielsen 1- 7>I fcer:21 STD II /-Z1 GliEfiwlr•K_u ! I. Description: This project will provide electrical service,a drinking fountain and site furnishings for the newly constructed Pavilion structure. Justification: Provides amenties that will support rental use of the pavillion. Project Cost Estimate 1$1: Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Design/Plan Review 50 58,000 SO 50 $0 50 58,000 Right-of-Way S0 50 50 $0 $0 50 50 Construction 5100,000 567,500 SO $0 SO $0 5167,500 Inspection&Administration 50 S0 50 SO 50 50 50 Contingency 50 56,750 SO $0 SO $0 $6,750 Total Costs: $100,000 $82,250 $0 50 SO 50 5182,250 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Park Development 1120) $100,000 $82,250 50 50 50 50 $182,250 Total Costs: $100,000 $82,250 $0 SO $0 50 5182,250 Impact on Operations: This project will require maintenance of the amenities proposed,as well as additional expenditure for electrical and water. Estimated annual costs are:Electric 5200,water$510,materials$2,550contract services$650. F2 Project Number: 1L Key: 1861 Object: Etiwanda Creek Park-Sidewalk Improvements Project Location: —:1 ' 5939 East Avenue =® a '' , . , ... EnwANOA COLONY d RPr ECEMENlahY • EIIWANOA CAW'COMMUNITY PARK. EARLY I US111i IJ PI N1ERMEOIATE NOR XIGM .. 1 �.. O<NYAN Est Construction Start/End: = ��. :_Si E=—.1 k 5/15/2015-7/1/15 jrtl—,�A.•, =.J (, ' j PROJECT LOCATION M Project I_gl -, 8 t.t -_5 =j3"=.-?r LD,.i4PLL CI g t = '—' �- Status: _ Construction :104 _.AV ��mix, CASSIA ST JI cvoAla,n+ Department: j 1 /// Alll Community Services/Parks- / Engineering ,— �� 1'•'=^•'"+ - - - Project Manager: _ -- ------------ - Iz o. .__ Romeo David AVE f=aren't.� snrnny — Description: This project involves the modification of existing sidewalks and provisions for new sidewalks to accommodate ADA. Justification: Currently,there is no sidewalk access to the north side of the soccer/football fields. In addition,the sidewalks and access points in the dog park are not accessible from the parking lot. Project Cost Estimate)$): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 5o $0 S0 $0 $0 So SO Design/Plan Review $25,000 So $0 $0 $0 SO $25,000 Right-of-Way 50 S0 50 $0 SO $0 50 Construction SO 5240,000 So $0 50 $0 5240,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $10,000 $0 SO $0 $0 $10,000 Contingency SO $0 $0 $0 $0 SO $0 Total Costs: $25,000 5250,000 50 $0 50 SO 5275,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Park Development(120) 525,000 5250,000 5o $0 So $0 5275,000 Total Costs: $25,000 $250,000 $0 SO 50 50 $275,000 Impact on Operations: Completion of this project will allow access to the soccer/football fields,as well as the dog park area to comply with ADA. F3 Project Number: R.Key: 1860 Object: Park Playground ADA and CPSC Improvements Project Location: _S ' L.( ,)/ is /f - "">:-'^•'�J ene^'(" s f „ 7730 Spruce Avenue r�`F'� /(� � 4">•✓ � coro1 um F>RN ; � I' YL`- ,r :� ]rye/ -( 'CD 31/ I S�}�\ Ru T1MVSieR ( I i^1..' Gt g'∎ 7's y.±E■ I11III _ rnooer I Ll (� n'� r•R,v_E,vrn�`1r`LRn U t ',. Est.Construction Start/End: < - /�J� , xcM ee `n �� 9/2014-11/2014 ;i ri Z I;i I MILL SKEW '`\\\\ \ C nie cTNr? Project Status: l (� ,k4c •� 'lrmemnkv iP \\� Construction ',' i ry,F4` ■�` Department-. PROJECT LOCATION e.Le"""`wls°°R( Community Services/Parks I _ ) •--r�—�i� C Project Manager: Nettie Nielsen i [OOiMlll PLVU Description: This project includes the installation of new playground equipment which complies with current Consumer Products Safety Commission(CPSC)and Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA)Standards at Spruce Avenue Park. Justification: This project will improve accessibility and safety. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2015/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES SO $0 So 50 $0 50 So Design/Plan Review SO $0 SO SO SO SO 50 Right-of-Way SO $0 SO $0 SO SO S0 Construction 50 5150,000 S0 50 $0 50 $150,000 Inspection&Administration 50 SO S0 50 SO 50 50 Contingency 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Total Costs: $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL LMD 4R(Fund 134) S0 5150,000 $0 So SO S0 5150,000 Total Costs: $0 $150,000 50 50 So 50 5150,000 Impact on Operations: This project reduces the amount of maintenance performed on playground equipment. F4 Project Number: JL Key: Object: 5607 Park Playground Rubberized Surface Maintenance Project Location: 4` "i° ° `ALL i ��Jsf_ll 15_ >> ,u._ �a 1( West Greenway Park(LMD 4R) ,'LzCGC4SOU' FIR7'"CINUM �2���Gr j� �JNVn NIL:UIf {,LU z W-1 ti a. 1I N 7 y "rn I Trz `.'._.NPY WE4S�\\ 7 L vsE l)1 I 1 Pry COYOTE CANYON PARK ' �y 1 \ wNln/IT Est.Construction Start/End: // , I "'e. •� a; / PROJECT LOCATIO`N�, � .� July 2014—June 2015 \ ou�c I NtpTry_- r�1 � ` ,Coy_ fa' ` V RU TH MUSS ER LJII1 ' t, : (HPProject Status: l �Requested for FY 2014-2015 _ fI 1�-_-�.—I nom "gSDNhiY ilFYatINi' l .\ J C \ SPRU CE AV E `PARK 1 v ryy� `�AAIInTa 04 Department: - `\ r L; r Public Works Services \ \ Y �,J _N tin' 1 i -ST OR=ENA AY PA'K I ii \.\ /,,//'' _1\\ 1 I rd ILLIKEN PAR4 Project Manager: Rc / 9L CO OTE taNY•N Dean Rodia 7:7XN \� LEmENTtrRY Description: Maintenance of the existing playground surface at West Greenway Park(LMD 4R)with a new rubberized surface. Justification: The rubberized playground surface meets the latest ADA requirements. Project Cost Estimate(S): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 S0 $0 $0 50 50 50 Design/Plan Review 50 So So 50 50 50 50 Right-of-Way 50 50 $0 S0 $0 SO 50 Construction $0 $15,000 50 $0 50 50 $15,000 Inspection&Administration 50 50 50 5o 50 50 50 Contingency 50 $1,000 SO $0 $0 $0 $1.000 Total Costs: $0 516,000 $0 $0 50 50 516,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL LMD 4R Terra Vista(134) $0 $16,000 $0 $0 50 50 $16,000 Total Costs: S0 516,000 50 50 50 50 $16,000 Impact on Operations: The playground at West Greenway Park will have to be closed to the general public while the new rubberized sur face is being installed. F5 Project Number: iL Key: Object: 5607 Park Playground Seat Wall (f Protect Location: I � (r—�.ai ec C__ Is I1 � �;.umv!k�<u.)L tII J Ralph Lewis Park(LMD 4R) ' r` _� I Call • BVRSLOR —s4 It Y :j.”8's � o—�rT I l'Y SG:F. NC9-_ E f _r� # Y ' `R p V1t5�9PA�� F ::)`/n 3 0 C COYOL£CANYO L r •l 0 (oq r, ,;..AK, ,Th ,.2 j^A•..y� w_\..1;. IN C v —77 S..r> n Est.Construction Start/End: ,-.../ / `t `� vas �- r , < °sue_ l F �•� a'��/ RV LX M1IV SSER K'\ 4+i 'l 3 1 tf. � July 2014—June 2015 *i ,::: uua.c 17;' —°J �`e , PROJECT'LOCATIOt� ' Project Status: seRVOE AVCm VARR 'I' J 1 Requested for FY 2014-2015 i �'A v `-�--..,,_.,A; ,F;o�.ws/Lc RSEUWA ar�cRK 1 1 _ \`\ m MILLIKEN PA Department: _ 11, • COYOiE CA ON eiee\c Ni4 r Public Works Services 4 f f l Teo); ---_ .•Project Manager: -\:- e \ \ � RnM yews Rq Dean Radio ' in'--------_. • I� Description: Construct seat walls adjacent to the Ralph Lewis Park playground. Justification: The seat walls would prevent soil and park debris from entering the playground area and prevent playground sand and debris from entering the park. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 . 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 S0 $0 50 SO $0 50 Design/Plan Review S0 So 50 50 $0 50 50 Right-of-Way 50 50 $0 50 50 50 $0 Construction $0 $8,000 50 $0 $0 50 $8,000 Inspection&Administration $0 SO 50 $0 $0 $0 50 Contingency $0 $720 SO SO SO SO $720 Total Costs: 50 $8,720 $0 50 50 50 58.720 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL LMD 4R Terra Vista(134) 50 58,720 So $0 $0 $0 58,720 Total Costs: 50 $8,720 $0 50 $0 $0 $8,720 Impact on Operations: Access to the Ralph Lewis Park playground will be restricted while the seat wall is being constructed. Long term maintenance costs will be reduced by separating turf and playground areas. - F6 Project Number: 11.Key: 1754 Object: Southwest Cucamonga Park Project Location: �d r �-1 f�' I �u V East side of Madrone Avenue t hen I J�'"� I/I� ���I �,r ��I J �� it II-- :_r between Arrow Route and 9th ' ® ," II`—�i �i IL,�i -�?s- �_ Street r� i -_i_ i�OTi{I L -R�VFl�'— 6 6 1. d II V Est.Construction Start/End: - p l 1 q`-`�'—",—IT 1/2015-1/2017 i. ; O JIB-�c�ii U' i( �L?J' W ,C 11 f 1nil ,�ll in Project Status: � .4 Q ,--• Design ; (I P}' � PROJECT LOCATION l �J i�I I Ji Q i=_.,.• z�t kT I Il Department: J r I in—I rn Community Services n I --' Project Manager: f—Ii I) YARD �1J_�� tS II Nettie Nielsen CITY LIMITS I I ----, Description: The City was awarded$3,941,136,as a Prop 84 State Grant,to design and construct a 3.4 acre neighborhood park for the local residents in Southwest Cucamonga. Project must be completed by 1 une 2017. Justification: No other neighborhood park within a 1/2 mile radius. Park will serve low income neighborhood. Project Cast Estimate(5): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $2,282 50 50 50 50 50 52,282 Design/Grant Prep 567,772 5283,500 50 50 50 50 $351,272 Site Remediation 540,000 $0 SO 50 50 50 $40,000 Construction SO $0 $3,469,907 $0 $0 50 53,469907 Inspection&Administration 50 50 $165,180 50 50 50 $165,180 Contingency $0 $0 $0 50 50 50 50 Total Costs: $110,054 $283500 $3,635,087 $0 SO $0 $4,028,641 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Park Development(120) $47,500 $0 $0 $0 50 50 547,500 Prop 84 State Grant(235) $22,554 5283,500 53.635,087 50 50 SO 53,941,141 RDASA 540.000 50 SO 50 50 50 540,000 Total Costs: 5110P54- $253,500 $3,035,087 $0 50 SO $4,028,641 Impact on Operations: This project will provide a new neighborhood park and will require park maintenance such as mowing and cleaning of bathrooms,as well as maintenance of all other amenities and landscape irrigation. It will increase operational and maintenance costs by approximately $60,000 per year in General Fund, or more depending on addition of water feature. F7 Project Number: JL Key: Object: 5607 Various Parks within LMD 4- Ballfield Fence and Curb Replacement Project Location: I Lt;'.----)1 east LINE-R1 LMD 4-Coyote Park,Milliken Park r s zi /III w [Ee® , , 'l pl,4:[.bhl � 4 // ,I RHEk10Lt:. !J`J�J] and Mountain View Park rhll Jt e- 4•t kfiEiIYLP F NIPROJECT LOCATION ;-___ = IR K , �l fi- —J 7, r` l{I .1 u l`l F__ S1 Y9/ / i/ i1,1yCKW PV Wli �'C\ 1–�---,&,--. 3 9,1, �(. A / iv: V� • 1 `�� ra,I, yl. Est.Construction Start/End: corolx CANyC} DARN - n l( Na. +,r July 2014–tune 2015 s{ 3 )\ \. Jr w- / )_ TRRRA VISTA{ n - 1 t s -1 !.`y ELEMENTgRr tC - � 4.‘63°\ I ', Oh. r 1 ' i- C C R Project Status: --�(.+t�4,,, - `"g ~t. r9`_ Lt ) �I t� Id OUR AIN VI .Pi Requested for FY 2014-2015 LI 3-i--...,,,,,I r't J f �: 1 V 'pp :. a �Ln _—= \/ r4, rctc 1Nii41iW- H Igo p ���\\\\_ Department: '1 `!—I , Lcna \w� .PARK i_ �^� .vs. Public Works Services -�/ ryL1r� E TARE ENWAYPghK Lr //N PARK' 491 V// Project Manager: 'YV�, co OTr CANTON • Dean Rodia .,�, LeMpnTgpr / l,( ' Description: Removal and replacement of existing chain link fencing along ballfields. Construction of a 1' high concrete curb under the replacement chain link fencing. Justification: The existing chain link fencing has been damaged from years of use. The construction of a 1'high concrete curb under the fencing will separate the brick dust of the ballfield from the adjacent grass and protect the fence from future damage. Project Cost Estimate(5): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 S0 S0 50 50 50 50 Design/Plan Review 50 So 50 50 50 so 50 Right-of-Way 50 So $D 50 50 50 $0 Construction 50 $34,000 50 50 50 50 534,000 Inspection&Administration SO $300 S0 $0 $0 $0 $300 Contingency 50 $3,400 50 $0 50 50 $3,400 Total Costs: $0 $37,700 50 50 50 S0 $37,700 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL LMD 4R Terra Vista(134) 50 $37,700 $0 50 50 50 537,700 Total Costs: $0 $37300 $o $0 50 50 537,700 Impact on Operations: The ballfields will not be usable for 2 weeks while the chain link fence is being replaced and curb installed. Once completed,the new improvements will lower maintenance to the ballfields. F8 4141 t __eft; _Holife//,'''' 4 . i • i if 1 h. '/ RailroadCrossings . Railroad Crossings are extremely expensive and infrequent projects, requiring large funding commitments, lengthy construction schedules and inevitably causing some inconvenience to the local community during the construction period. They are, however, also one of the best ways to ensure the safety of drivers, pedestrians and rail users by providing two separate crossings, thereby minimizing the possibility of train versus automobile, or train versus pedestrian accidents. Railroad Crossings are identified in the City's General Plan document, and they are also frequently illustrated in regional planning documents held by the County of San Bernardino, SANBAG and Caltrans. Project List& FY 2014-I5 Expenditures Sources of Funding for FY 2014-15 I. Arrow Route @ RailroadSpur $500 $500 - New Concrete Panels $650.000 2. Hellman Avenue @ Metrolink- $1,300,000 Tracks Widen Crossing Total $1,300,500 $650,000 4 ■Citywide Infrastructure ■Transportation is Gas Tax RT7360 G Project Number: 800-2013-12 1 L Key: 1819 Object: Arrow Route at Railroad Spur- New Concrete Panels Project Location: I I I I ii Arrow Route at Railroad Spur west - w 4444 > FOOTHLIL RI:VrI u.� of Milliken Avenue S. ® Z + Ill a �4�CC J IHALL \\ / _- 0 RC POLICE STATION \ c..P..ILI-ENn Est.Construction Start/End: TER=DR PROJECT L`OGATION 5/2016 �`��-i J /l1 `J ir------��, RAI 6 Project Status: O R• Design _ �_. a Ir I _Ag ROWI RJE F — Ius Department: 1 r I ig C Y ; _ d A:D�J a ---Engineering Q U— F W Project Manager: —� I II n v /1 Romeo David _.-Jl ll `tl If[ y >o,: -o, ,rr. FIR f;-S-ATI ON----: Description: Replace existing uneven rubber panels to concrete panels. Justification: The existing rubber panels are uneven and damaged due to heavy traffic used. Replacing with concrete panels will give a smoother ride and safer for vehicles. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $10,000 5500 $0 S0 SO $10,500 Right-of-way SO SO $0 $0 SO So $0 Construction $0 $0 $60,000 $0 $0 S0 560,000 Inspection&Administration S0 S0 $9,000 $0 $0 $0 $9,000 Contingency 50 50 56,000 50 $0 $0 $6,000 Total Costs: $10,000 5500 $75,000 50 50 50 $85,500 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Gas Tax RT7360 Fund(174) $10,000 $500 $75.000 $0 $0 SO $85,500 Total Costs: 510,000 $500 $75000 $0 $0 50 585,500 Impact on Operations: Uneven rubber created damage along the edges of the existing asphalt pavement. This project will reduce maintenance for asphalt replacement. G1 Project Number: 800-2013-17 1L Key: 1847 Object: Hellman Avenue at Metrolink Tracks-Widen Crossing Project Location: Hellman Avenue at Metrolink I•. Tracks(8th Street) „JI ® us • £7/3_1.1 t z It +; if 3 i • .0.I Est.Construction Start/End: 'a is 1/2015-5/2015 JJ a a ,-1 I 1:131160517171 _i Project Status: Design/Construction �io ---JJI ec N> Department: to z ‘O Engineering 5 Project Manager: \ PROJECT LOCATION Romeo David It .r...,c. Description: Construction of traffic signal and widen the road at the Metrolink tracks. • Justification: This project will improve the traffic flows,circulation and pedestrian safety due to a new traffic signal,wider road and sidewalks. Project Cost Estimate IS): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Design/Plan Review 50 550,000 50 S0 $0 SO $50,000 Right-of-Way $0 - S0 50 50 S0 SO S0 Construction S0 51,000,000 So SO 50 50 $1,000,000 Inspection&Administration 50 $150,000 50 50 50 50 $150,000 Contingency So $100,000 S0 $0 50 $0 5100,000 Total Costs: S0 51,300,000 50 S0 50 $0 51,300,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2015/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Transportation Fund(124) 50 5650,000 50 $0 $0 50 5650,000 Citywide Infrastructure Fund(198) 50 5650,000 50 50 SO SO 5650,000 Total Costs: 50 $1,300,000 S0 S0 50 S0 .51,i00non Impact on Operations: The City will be responsible to pay for the cost of electricity and maintenance. The estimated cost of electricity and maintenance for a traffic signal is$2,500 per year. In addition,the street widening,sidewalks and new pavement will mean less routine maintenance like pothole repairs, weed abatement and crack seal, thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. G2 4 . - a Streets Streets projects are the most common type of project undertaken P J tYP P 1 by the City. The City receives annual funding from gasoline sales taxes for use on resurfacing projects for local arterial and residential streets in order to extend pavement life and improve driving conditions. Besides street rehabilitation projects, the City also undertakes many widening and extension projects as need dictates via new development, community needs and the City's General Plan. Project List&FY 2014-15 Expenditures Project List&FY 2014-15 Expenditures 1. 4th St.,Archibald to Haven North Side $500 21. Rochester Ave.,Foothill Blvd to $500 Pavement Rehab Base Line Rd.-Pavement Rehab 2. 6th St.,Hermosa to Haven- $300,000 22. San Bernardino Rd.,Carnelian to $20,000 Pavement Rehab Archibald—Pavement Rehab 3. 7th St.,Hellman to Archibald- $20,000 23. Spruce Ave.,Foothill to Base $30,000 Pavement Rehab Line—Pavement Rehab 4. 8th St.,Baker to Hellman, Pavement $300,000 24. Victoria St.,Etiwanda to East $500 Rehab City Limit—Widening&Rehab 5. 9th St.,North Side from 100' west to $115.800 25. Youngs Canyon Rd.,Koch Place $100,000 800'west of Vineyard,Sidewalk to Cherry Ave.—St. Extension 6. 19th St,from West City Limit to $1,375,000 Total $4,430,300 Haven,Pavement Rehab 7. Archibald Ave.,4th to Foothill, $500 Pavement Rehab 8. Archibald Ave.,Hillside to North City $500 Sources of Funding for FY 2014-15 Limit-Pavement Rehab 9. Baker St.,Main to Foothill- $350,000 Pavement Rehab $1,254,500 10.Baseline Ave.,@ I-15 Interchange $200,000 $474,000 II.Carnelian St.,Lemon to Wilson- $S00 Pavement Rehab 12.Etiwanda Ave.,6th to Arrow- $100,000 $275,500 Widening 13.Foothill Blvd.,SCE Corridor west of $145,000 Day Creek Channel,Sidewalk $195.000 14.Foothill Blvd.,Vineyard to Archibald- $500 - $109,000 Pavement Rehab $100,000 15.Haven Ave.,Wilson to N.City Limits $500 $90,800 Pavement Rehab $1,931,500 16.Hellman Ave.,Baseline to 19th $410,000 Pavement Rehab 17.Hermosa Ave.,Banyan to Wilson- $500 Pavement Rehab -Citywide Infrastructure ®AD 88-2 18.Lemon Ave.,Archibald to Haven- $500 El Gas Tax R&T 7360 .Safe Rte to School Grant Pavement Rehab 19.Local Streets Pavement Rehab $959,000 El Measure I(177) -Prop 42 20.Madrone Ave.,north of 9th St.- $500 -Measure!(176) a Transportation Widening H I Project Number: 800-2013-03 JL Key: 1853 Object: 4th Street from Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue- North Side Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: I -btgiN'sn OLD TOW LD i RK II 4th Street From Archibald Avenue ° - HUMUOUI--AVE 2 to Haven Avenue F�� © /r�I Ylh ,N DV,NA, CT �� W� G G L 7_TH-S't-1Q _ ILISS:S i�U w it:: 'I PROJECT LOCATION '< ON:$TJ< Est.Construction Start/End: IooK:ST1 'c= I 8/2015-10/2015 wgJj. I I 0 m Project Status: MIS WA a: a Design ��� HAW THORNE ST !� u, rc�TH:s.r_ Department: < /3 � 'RIU `=tHIV-IL/AA \ Engineering I J Ti ) C J 1 Ir Project Manager: — -r o Romeo David Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. In addition,the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle 3 rebate. Project Cost Estimate(5): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Design/Plan Review $20,000 $500 S0 SD S0 SO $20,500 Right-of-Way $0 So $0 50 50 50 50 Construction 50 $0 $272,000 $0 $0 50 $272,000 Inspection&Administration 50 SO $6,000 50 $0 50 56.000 Contingency 50 5O 527,000 $0 $0 S0 527,000 Total Costs: 520,000 $500 $305,000 50 SO 50 5325.500 Project Funding: , Funding,Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Measure I Fund(176) $10,000 50 50 50 $0 50 $10,000 Measure I Fund(177) $10,000 $500 $305,000 $0 50 S0 5315,500 Total Costs: $20,000 $500 $305,000 SO $0 $0 $325,500 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. H1 Project Number: 800-2013-04 11 Key: 1849 Object: 6th Street from Hermosa Avenue to Haven Avenue - Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: N-IJ1.5T 6th Street From Hermosa Avenue to Haven Avenue IrNIAN4 C I t ACADDIA.sC PHILADELPHIA CT -...1 at Est.Construction Start/End: < 7TH.5T��<��- 8/2014-10/2014 z - J., .r LL a: z: > Li: D. >_ Project Status: b PROJECT LOCATION Design iCe- .su ft Department: SHAFON pft Engineering n r I J -I-- - __z Project Manager: Romeo David 1-11 yV ---- '--"'.'—H—(-1 . Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition.extending pavement life,use,and rideability. In addition,the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle 2 rebate. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES S0 50 50 S0 SO $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $15,000 515,000 50 50 SO SO $30,000 Right-of-Way SO $0 SO 50 SO 50 SO Construction So $240,000 $0 50 50 SO $240,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $21,000 $0 $0 So $0 $21,000 Contingency SO $24,000 $0 50 $0 50 $24,000 Total Costs: $15,000 $300,000 $0 S0 $0 $0 $315,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund(174) $15,000 $300,000 $0 SO $0 50 5315,000 Total Costs: 515,000 $300,000 S0 50 S0 SO $315,000 Impact on Operations: less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas, H2 Project Number: 800-2014-04 IL Key: 1876 Object: 7th Street from Hellman Avenue to Archibald Avenue - Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: -- 8:TH:ST ' ' 7th Street from Hellman Avenue to < a Archibald Avenue L./ :>11: J Q' 54 -4 Er o <—ACACiTS: PROJECT LOCATION r. Li 5... 081. 010 Start/End: ^� OS/22015 15--10/20/20 15 f".,... Y Project Status: v Iri)—~lig -+i EDEC`1dEIS5S.r ••-•� Design s �_.�J 'Q a _ uz __ Er - 'a 1v Z 2 EW I �`AtallltiN ST w U.EEI liljllc7K T5 0— Department: 3. '6-6 it-c S I�f S ¢� n a. ¢ — Engineering c � LnEEHf'RU`CSK t_ z ()I J 1 � j—ISiFat?4SN�� rz- Project Manager: Y K' 1 r rXEAU,tiws P Romeo David s I r— v-1 67.1:1ST Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping, Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. In addition,the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle 3 rebate. Project Cost Estimate(5): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPOES SO SO 50 So $0 50 SO Design/Plan Review $0 $20,000 $0 $0 50 50 520,000 Right-of-Way So 50 50 $0 S0 50 $0 Construction $0 SO $218,000 $0 $0 50 $218,000 Inspection&Administration $0 SO $10,000 $0 SO 50 $10,000 Contingency $0 50 $22,000 $0 SO $0 $22,000 Total Costs: $0 $20,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 S270,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund(174) 50 520,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $270,000 Total Costs: 50 $20,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $270,000 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. H3 Project Number: 800-2013-05 11..Key: 1851 Object: 8th Street from Baker Avenue to Hellman Avenue- Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: 1 —0-�mrm7 BEAR GA LES (li I± $ wR1 EcemexTnRr s Ill — 8th Street From Baker Avenue to ;—� ,oa.ew000�R1 11 IZ, ip, ,.�R Hellman Avenue - s n� _�R �<i[yENP �� i BEP ill 1 -1[1 i Li „) Est.Construction Start/End: ! 'Fe: ri 8/2014-10/2014 —^` '1 >NTAHI 1 IENTAR/ �I Project Status: fl 81ic&T e Design i E Ij L'6i'"ER''I Gr PROJECT LOCATION u !�: I_ c 3 Department: Engineering. -- I .n Project Manager: V"' _..._. ,f.,_..___,...:.. ?�..: ^:i7e_ -�a:.F:�'----•---�.--___,---.—.If�- Romeo David \\ \ Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. In addition,the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle 2 rebate. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $15,000 $20,000 50 $0 $0 50 $35,000 Right-of-Way 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 50 Construction 50 $220,000 $0 $0 50 50 $220,000 inspection&Administration $0 538A0o So $0 $0 $0 538,000 Contingency So 522,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $22,000 Total Costs: $15,000 5300,000 50 50 SO $0 $315,000 Project Funding: • Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund(174) 515,000 $300,000 $o $0 50 $0 $315,000 Total Costs: $15,000 $300,000 $0 50 $0 $0 $315,000 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. H4 Project Number: 800-2012-20 IL Key: 1808 Object: 9th Street West of Vineyard Avenue-Sidewalk Improvements • Project Location: ": I- --RGW H lu— — 9th Street north side from 100 feet 11 V u ° z west of Vineyard Avenue to 800 ff � z Q�ur v feet west of Vineyard Avenue. s'- -Ja U ° a s z q •r g < ----i" 6 w z LOS AMIGOS : IIj > ELEMENTARYS_R_.WnpD.c y ' Est.Construction Start/End: ARROW RTE.. 11/2014-12/2014 1 i f - —1 --eiH:S t - P• Project Status-. i C�gyitgcr5,;r z, y Design and Construction Cs' Department: s PROJECT LOCAT•ON Engineering -Mild 3_ Project Manager: ...�..�..�..�..�..�..�.._..�.:_.._.._..�..�..�..�.. 8TH ST. .ti_.._.. Curt Billings ��y Description: Project to construct 700 feet of sidewalk on the north side of 9th Street. Justification: To provide students a safe and direct route walking to school.The poject goal is to reduce the need for bus services and its benefits are measured by student surveys taken before and after the project. The City was awarded a federal Safe Routes To School grant to fund 75%of the construction costs. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPOES 50 $0 S0 so S0 s0 50 Design/Plan Review $7,850 SO SO $0 $0 $0 $7,850 Right-of-Way 50 $0 50 $0 SO $0 50 Construction $0 $103,000 $0 $0 $0 SO $103,000 Inspection&Administration S0 $2,300 So SO $0 $0 $2,300 Contingency 50 $10,500 SO $0 50 $0 510,500 Total Costs: 57,850 $115,800 $0 50 50 SO $123,650 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Citywide Infrastructure(198) $7,850 525,000 $0 $0 SO $0 532,850 Safe Route School Fund(234) $0 590,800 50 50 50 $0 $90,200 Total Costs: $7,850 $115,800 50 50 $0 SO $123,650 Impact on Operations: Reduction in parkway maintenance costs. H5 • Project Number: 800-2013-08 Jl Key: 1836 Object: 19th Street from West City Limit to Haven Avenue - Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: ;. 1 JI �, �I—„ 1l_---+—" agt- ' f... �C i t Ij , I l l s ,ten�� 19th Street from S I �„ } west city limit to v 2 _.. I )1 ( 3,�: Haven Avenue _ s • 11 Lill 1� 2 .. • a it li� Y 1 , , I ii. p 19-----,.{, I�I. LA'd .:N ' � Y..f :JT_I•IF+',ir �I_��I Jlr rb 'f k y;§ &f...,• JI_'�^QH,Lr �'4 h r Lt , 1 t JJJ�i fls- -� ° 4ir u r a —J : 7- , Est.Construction Sta 4' a°• r- B = iz•sal, „ii�I 11 4 Tai PROJECT LOCATION.t , , - , -17 q ii 9 p `o uiL' __ 8/2014-10/2014 - c f,d 1, s, II:3w a) 4 I I'JJ `I aJI rip I , ,,.< ' C .mss >--..w• Project Status: , I. ?I�.�fg"~, 19TH ST -� ��� 1 f i` '��a�� �u y y�l Design w11,ks6.• 5 i.A .. ..., JI 1 1 j—' q q i r� —7 i1.---1-e-4 e .n.n_ : r i a -9 it 1 p + > Department: a 1 5 1:4“ iE G..,,..”, a-L 1—"t1 l- 6j I E, .4 2 i } U .> Engineering c d .•� 3• 0 k•.�1 l + as' ,x•o v fr 9 6� l..i,.�fr�:..�...,1 M .I(".,,o.,..n.�nrr..>r ..�L T� J pp a S iJ .^ I�CJj. L.�.._..� / _ Project Manager. rr ���1`l J't�ni s� (j �� Mu..�,.� I � JI Romeo David { BASELINE Rari Ii-y °p,tilT t-.L-, I "'S J� L a • Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. In addition,the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle 2 rebate. Project Cost Estimate(5): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 50 5o so 50 $o Design/Plan Review $49,500 $0 So SO 50 SO 549,500 Right-of-Way S0 50 50 50 SO 50 So Construction $0 $1,225,000 S0 $0 SO $0 $1,225,000 Inspection&Administra 50 527,500 50 50 SD $0 $27,500 Contingency SO $172,500 50 50 50 50 Sizz.soo Total Costs: $49,500 $1,375,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,424,500 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Measure I Fund(176) 50 5474,000 SO $0 $0 50 $474,000 Measure I Fund(177) $49,500 $901,000 SO $0 50 50 $950,500 Total Costs: $49,500 51,375,000 $0 SO $0 5O 51,i24,500 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up mantenance crews to attend to other needed areas. • H6 Project Number: 800-2013-09 IL Key: 1852 Object: Archibald Avenue from 4th Street to Foothill Boulevard -Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: I I y1,% + ' • 1 RIE.NTi-1 y—z CENTER I5(-�J EL'EII:ENIT-. Archibald Avenue from 4th Street • _R6 FATr1ILY'S PORTS CENTER Ls i w}:1n� T u to Foothill Boulevard FOOTHIL�DEVD a y- �y i i HAMl SHIRF"I'tr m a ® ;� 7�'e� , Iii z1�:J CITY HA LL J ('1_BEA 2!'G'Ci j L1GHpLAe ER S fc,rir:c!-'; rw.--Yj+ --'-I� Q/ k,—ELEh1FN�ARY l l —n1 /LBE't1;TDIDARLY (''}] �. �_. I ARGULCH-PARW TT( Q ARR�O�W-RTE �"F`i �1 —� -I-SPEt:IAt ED 1 Z Lu v A I I LL121 1 w i' �b-{ 4 :p < Lo IT 1g 0 4 Q 1-+ < $P ��§$ c CU's(MONGA r Est.Construction Start/End: EIIEMENaWerY I 'I I -.I 9TH ST.. TH-ST ELE�1ENTi4RY y 8/2015-10/2015 II— I l r— r Iv ` �� a I I RANG HM IDD ETAGNGAI I.•j 7 i ` 1C1-t- If 11 td1DD�:E MAIN-4l{ I nil rose '``^--=-c$_ i. OLD TOWN •AR L Project Status-. ,tea al a I .1''. jl EMPIRE LANES'G' Design PROJECT LOCATIO '��• ' �- NH-0 Department: [ IALADCW-S i GOLDEN 4AN�PA'RKf = 6TH-S7— ' Jill II V > I 1 III a I ` < Efd el ELAKI G� ewer:DR- Project Manager: I _ Romeo David -~47•1•5T Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. In addition,the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle 3 rebate. Project Cost Estimate I$): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 50 $0 $o so so 50 Design/Plan Review 550,000 $500 50 SO 50 50 550,500 Right-of-Way SO 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction SO 50 $1,070,000 $0 50 $0 51,070,000 Inspection&Administration $0 50 $24,000 $0 $0 SO $24,000 Contingency 50 50 $107,000 $0 So $0 5107,000 Total Costs: $50,000 $500 $1,201,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,251,500 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Measure I Fund(176) $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $50,000 • Measure I Fund(177) $0 $500 $1,201,000 $0 So $0 $1,201,500 Total Costs: $50,000 5500 $1.201,000 $0 Su $0 51,251,590 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. H7 Project Number: 800-2013-10 R.Key: 1727 Object: Archibald Avenue from Hillside Road to North City Limit- Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: Archibald Avenue from Hillside _ _ _ _�_ —�__ _ _ _ _ Road to North City Limit � � � � �� x'crunvn n A � f 17 11:11 � e _ l MU yJ A TI„ . WYo L sT7 i F neeee ;14:,- i „-, '- PROJECT LOCATION ++ _' Est.Construction Start/End: Rr<a�n:Rgr i n x RI �,�1 8/2015-10/2015 ,. II !-° , I = P te_ ha�nxr--� ;Jx �i __ nrll - Ki atAn.T) ,Cm _. , of `'� Project Status: Ii n w mvoo1 OF F���� �a O Nrylh[RWPY��S Igo Design q nFO.t�F i L ycP. I (_ hTatn'srvtwr.tub ,�IER DR Jn9FU //� Department: i1ll,l .* (r 1`_, a .—__+ II I trice i:iE- Engineering If % 1I I ° a`JI uve.Oe j `� :: r a 8=4204o -S Project Manager: x :4 3 Romeo David ";,„ns,i.lT 'sy,rou I Il Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. In addition,the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle 3 rebate. Project Cost Estimate(5): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 SO $o $0 $0 50 Design/Plan Review $17,220 $500 $0 S0 $0 50 $17,720 Right-of-Way 50 $0 50 50 $0 50 SO Construction $0 50 $490,000 S0 S0 50 5490,000 Inspection&Administration 50 50 $11,000 50 50 50 511,000 Contingency S0 SO $49,000 50 50 $0 $49,000 Total Costs: $17,220 $500 $550,000 50 $0 $0 $567,720 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Measure I Fund 1177) 517,220 5500 5550,000 50 SO 50 $567,720 Total Costs: $17,220 $500 $550,000 $0 $0 $0 $56],]20 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. H8 Project Number: 800.2014.10 IL Key:1869 Object: . Baker Street from Main Street to Foothill Boulevard -Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: Baker l Boulevard from Main Street to it \�`- \� �� Foothill Boulevards H'ft Fr.nA ftf41A0R6 �R \L �,V i7p G II 0 ' -, O' F¢vv� BEAR GUL'N e ��pf'CQ EL I'dENTARV Est.Construction Start/End: u� t 08/2014-10 2014 > - / n _a BEAR GULtil PAR O n —14- a" —�-ARR OW-RTE z II—_ll Project Status: ix 5 i o J I ) ROJECT LOCATION Design s -J w i SAUnA-st`_Z Z C u' w L•S AM(re s v w p ELEMENT-1r'? ¢ Department: < a P o 9`PH-SR Engineering aLL ¢ a > . K Li-LNG:Y- t v >1 E ¢ • 3 �¢ _.. w—, CHAFFcE-SE 1 r_ Project Manager: t0 > l I xLL JMAIN-ST Romeo David 84(14.5 T ..—...,,,,, 1--, c Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. In addition,the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CaiRecycle 2 rebate. Project Cost Estimate($): • Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/15 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 50 S0 50 50 SO SO Design/Plan Review $13,000 $20,000 $0 $0 50 50 $33,000 Right-of-Wa), 50 $0 SO SO $0 SO $0 Construction $0 $260,000 $0 $0 SO $0 5260,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $44,000 50 50 $0 SO 544,000 Contingency SO $76,000 SO $0 $0 $0 $26,000 Total Costs: $13,000 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $363,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund(174) $13,000 $0 $0 $0 SO $0 $13,000 Measure I Fund(177) SO 5350,000 $0 $0 $o 50 5350,000 Total Costs: $13,000 5350000 50 $u SO 50 $3E3,000 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. H9 Project Number: IL Key: 1361 Object: Base Line Road at I-15 Interchange Project Location: -Fr-..., 3 vIAJS E SACCO.DR q Base Line Road at the 1-15 .r.AR'-,.S ors z _ Freeway Si' I<=VIA-76.07RsD:DR=r0 i //) 6 > =to L`NFIEL - `��WINOY_GF)NEDR/ Z > PACIFIC LLLCIHIC TR411. p pp (./ 3TGN:5 Y'. `/�/ WI 7 C Y`� (� 1' ~ 5RAPELAN0 I I I¢—Y �u`,' (SUrvs HINE- „/!3 Jku :3 ELEAt ENTARY _____ .� 14 EMSo V> Est.Construction Start/End: J z J J%%/ /. 4717 1 ro-cn,LJrt z' , y / 07/2014 1 I I l /-�fe - , /s f 1) il ''OIJECT LOCATIO ( V J I - J .9ASFL Project Status: BASE LINE ftD_ �� /.. 1 � 2 Design $ , .— Department: ' `�EILtTAAfe.pR (`~—� fOLONIALOR /�.'�! r F Engineering ,J "�J/.a"�• '� r a Project Manager: ,- moo" ,j/ I:R�jS ll"'LLL'TTC+++ T BA..1 VLJRPT�pf-pp_5/� ,j WOVOf-HAiL LT �1 t )( Jason Welday 57 �'O ��� ii i ft t) Description: Construction of a modification to the on and off ramps for the 1-15 Freeway at Base Line Road. Justification: Due to the current and projected congestion of the streets around the interchange,it is necessary to improve access to and from the 1-15 freeway at Base Line Road. Up to 50 percent of the project costs are eligible for reimbursement through Federal funds. Project Cost Estimate(5): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $1,065,033 50 $0 50 $0 $0 $1,065,033 Design/Plan Review $4,576,400 $0 50 $0 So 50 54,576,400 Right-of-Way $7,396,387 $0 $0 SO $0 $0 57,396,387 Construction 535,000,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,200,000 Soft Costs $7,000,000 50 $0 50 S0 So $7,000,000 Contingency SD $0 50 50 50 50 50 Total Costs: $55,037,820 $200,000 50 $0 $0 $0 $55,237,820 Project Funding: • Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL General Fund(001) 518,996 $0 $0 50 50 50 $18,996 Transportation(124) 54,148,571 5200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,348,571 City Infrastructure(198) $1,350,000 SO 50 • $0 SO $0 $1,350,000 RDASC 2001 TAB(650) 53,771 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 53,771 RDASC 2004 TAB(660) $42,516,482 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $42,516,482 IMD(Federal) $3,000,000 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $3,000,000 SAFETEA-LU(Federal) $4,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,000,000 Grand Total Costs: $55,037,820 $200,000 $0 $0 $o so 555,237,820 Impact on Operations: City is expected to take over maintenance of the landscaping within the interchange. Area of landscaping has not yet been determined. H10 Project Number: 800-2013-13 1L Key: 1722 Object: Carnelian Street from Lemon Avenue to Wilson Avenue - Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: 1�, _=:W_i,^�`)i io IELEMENinml — � aaenr1,C, Carnelian Street from lemon Avenue to Wilson Avenue — ® 1,--' .3 �}l ,tr :Alt-7_ "`— � V 1t + .� r PtrE II ` _PROJECT LOCATOO ll � „ .c -r,.r 11— Est.Construction Start End: l I— �' tii } 8/2015-10/2015 / ,.�,., r 1 i�a oen:arI �� 44, —a r..a:c_ //' , ki . hi g I' Project Status: w `pv�, }4 I `�I s �"- cs" r • Design I� I — ` a ,I r '_ i II ILt Department: �;% / n, . �S a b;�..��,m ,c it I IJ � J 1:� �/ St �._ Engineering t // .'• ssg pQ jj.. 5 ` ,_ I S to _ Project Manager: /4' /,t z Ig. = _e_'1>1i_, iI IS Romeo David // /1 I n n n o IIn n o F7Th 0 aOat li▪lt• 0 0 C) Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. In addition,the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycie 3 rebate. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 $0 So 50 50 S0 $0 Design/Plan Review $10,500 5500 $0 $0 50 $0 $11,000 Right-of-Way SO $0 50 $0 SO SO $0 Construction $0 $0 $445,500 $0 So 50 $445,500 Inspection&Administration SO 50 510,000 50 50 So $10,009 Contingency $0 $0 $44,500 $0 $0 SO $44,500 Total Costs: Sio,s00 5500 $500,000 $0 SO SO 5511,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Measure I Fund(177) 510,500 .$500 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $511,000 Total Costs: 510,500 $500 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 5511,000 Impart on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. H 11 Project Number: 800-2010-15 1L Key: 1076 Object: Etiwanda Avenue from m6th�Street to Arrow Route-Widening Project location: O� -r11 Doll£s oR'd TSCOMPLEx /' j Etiwanda Avenue from 6th Street r(_� llcrceenr ruck .pyj r to Arrow Route 1 IAAOOP IO'�ENTER .4" • ' • 461 C If 1TKORR1[. _A8n(1Y:RIE •-.Q� . s PROJECT LOCATIOM � ' " w r;• WI _ w Est.Construction Start/End: LI,,NiT,,;.Ar.:ADr rf To be determined u F ATSF RAILROAD , i r artrT t Project Status: 1 Design 0 / ' t l Department: ¢ a— !'j .." li Engineering d i3 _.671-1:57_.671-1:57 ' rc 1 II Project Manager: rtxaZ ��,, (/ r Curt Billings I Description: Prepare a conceptual grade separation plan and cost estimate for the future widening of Etiwanda Avenue from 6th Street to Arrow Route. Justification: This project will provide a conceptional grade separation plan which is needed for the General Plan and informational purposes. It will also provide a cost esitmate for advance planning and funding. Project Cost Estimate($j: Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2015/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES SO so so $o SO 50 SO Design/Plan Review $157,600 5100,000 $0 $0 So 50 $257600 Right-of-way $0 $0 50 50 50 50 $0 Construction $0 $0 So $0 $0 $0 $o Inspection&Administration 50 $o $0 50 50 50 50 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 50 SO 50 Total Costs: $157,600 $100,000 $0 SO $0 $0 $257,600 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Transportation Fund(124) $132,500 575,000 $0 SO 50 50 5207,600 Infrastructure Fund(198) 525,000 525,000 $0 $0 50 $0 $50,000 Total Costs: 5157,600 $100,000 SO SO $0 $0 J52.bpp Impact on Operations; None H 12 Project Number: 800-2012-07 1 L Key: 1826 Objects: Foothill Boulevard across SCE Corridor West of Day Creek Channel-Sidewalk Improvements Project Location: �n L , I + um.GARDENS cull Foothill Boulevard across SCE I g. . I- �r— —f —n uORDwan,mrer Corridor west of Day Creek , „:,,,2”- ,nroecy: - - Channel J//f \ SC ------- ,z .e n, v ES r--C 4—<E_ q .r-- ,� ct Est.Construction Start/End: PROJECT LOCATION r IVr CLL LRrs---- 1/2015-2/2016 ` t"�c�r—J j,�/�- I 1 tt % Jl Project Status: PaOrniunTvo- --- / Design I=, t .J °r y/ �/ �i ) //�/---- Department: � �' ���' ttlwaTIN tiny //�/j Engineering /d' j Project Manager: �1Rancno�umorav D ur SPORTS COMPLEX //j � FPICE7r/ERSPIRhSCuMPLEr // /%i// Romeo David a J Description: This project will install 600 feet of sidewalk to close the gap between two existing sections of sidewalk. Justification: This project was requested by handicap residents using this route everyday.The improvements will improve pedestrian circulation as well as bring the area into ADA compliance. Project Cost Estimate(5): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 50 50 50 50 $D $O Design/Plan Review 50 $10,0011 5o 50 S0 S0 $10,000 Right-of-Way 50 50 So SO SO $0 50 Construction 50 5110,000 50 So 50 so $110,000 Inspection&Administration 50 $14,000 50 50 50 50 514,000 Contingency 50 511,000 So SO 50 50 511,000 Total Costs: 50 5145,000 50 50 50 50 5145,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL City Wide Infastructure Fund(198) 50 5145,000 50 50 50 50 5145,000 Total Costs: So 5145,000 50 50 50 50 5145,000 Impact on Operations: This project will reduce maintenance and weed abatement costs from General Fund and LMD 3B, H 13 Project Number: 800-2013-14 It Key: 1855 Object: Foothill Boulevard from Vineyard Avenue to Archibald Avenue -Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: ..f.5.;f' i / '' _ Foothill Boulevard from Vineyard '`, t I I s .. Avenue to Archibald Avenue y ,; F�>//�i� '" ! _� ��((IIII l�llr'�l I i 11 l Iry,kl2 A �2 r f//. h kk��h vnlwnl, - f__��—�.ItII Ir "1Je 2 • lreg - V I`_r•.1 y� �.+1.- d MNi LI�1 1 1__ ) Yt 21 e e e/ p ��' T,Enn 151 r>I -lriae sl3J. r I I—` " �( I —�" q;�LMILY SP<.(eTS CENiCk '� � _ �tue= IN.Rr r _ Est.Construction Start/End: qq iII�'�`_lt wn 08/2015-10/2015 - if? - ' -- l�M ri .Nki LW> J — Protect Status: � I^I A �, Design - PROJECT LOCATIbN I z Department: ;� vr'rrzT=3�J� W Engineering w—K r r.NN.LwC(N.L CLeM fi TARY Ek(T 1 r _'M1ONU`tesJ cP.lD s CLCMSNTARY C O =i.I > ;� Project Manager: > r 1 Gr Acn'?T _, � a I , -tiSiT.iTr° _ a I F Romeo David a �Wdx7. r �' ULBERRY ..ea2-L:'CL,:. 'J I �'y1 (`M sPEoPL Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. In addition,the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle 3 rebate. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 5o $0 S0 50 50 50 Design/Plan Review $15,000 $500 $0 $0 $0 50 515,500 Right-of-Way So So So $0 SO $0 $0 Construction SO S0 $715,000 50 $0 $0 $715,000 Inspection&Administration 50 $0 $16,000 $0 SO SO $16,000 Contingency 50 $0 $71,000 SO SO $0 $71,000 Total Costs: $15,000 $500 $802,000 $0 $0 $0 $817,500 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Measure I Fund(176) $15,000 $0 $0 $0 SO $0 $15,000 Measure I Fund(177) 50 $500 $802,000 $0 50 $0 $802,500 Total C^•ts .:1,000 5500 $807,000 $0 50 5F,:,503 Impact on Operations: less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. H 14 Project Number: 800-2013-16 11.Key: 1854 Object: Haven Avenue from Wilson Avenue to North City Limit- Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: Haven Avenue from Wilson rA•r.RS.ri Avenue to North City Limit q > 11 I © a Li zz m a 1 k v (i= ACMON t5 5 .MONo-ST a �� . (j Y Lr.1NFRn'LI nD / PROJECT LOCATION " HIUDE> I.I:-W---iii `�} 6 Q 1i rL nF. G- lV• Est.Construction Start/End: cARRAI<I:cr 1 a— r-- 8/2015-10/2015 v har I,- C�RWODD OR 4 �I WHIRLA• 'AV�51 n G� 11 I� I�I> JJ i C �TA RQVE=:T 2I I`I W �`I1L •J Pro ect Status: 1 ,t IJ� i�1 �LL i1 1 :IL W:51 J D ICI^ Design I n I kt —J '1 c III)r ji0A7roviD.A„c,r ,J�IWL:Np Lu s H S Hlt I"SIDL'7H (�• e_ Department: =c F,Z IJ s ° ir' Engineering a it:a = r i Y�1� I IjeNAcmfl. I < I �. �z,., a r O vIJA.4[rfl ONtL6J "1 4 CAPRI DR) (� AP Pd L:UN'. :H or MIN1LR^,T i II II Project Manager: POPCAresrzy o- `� ��J� W145r�ON AVE ��—L lI w Romeo David a O n 0 Pr // Pl4' fl I'I1 RMOSIA]n�y .JPTII Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. In addition,the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CaiRecycle 3 rebate. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016 17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 SO 50 50 Design/Plan Review $15,000 $500 $0 $0 50 60 $15,500 Right-of-Way $0 50 $0 $0 50 $o 50 Construction $0 $0 $668,500 $0 50 50 5668,500 Inspection&Administration 50 5o $15,000 50 $0 S0 $15,000 Contingency 50 50 666,500 50 50 50 $66,500 Total Costs: $15,000 5500 $750,000 ' 50 50 50 $765,500 Project Funding; Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Measure I Fund(176) 515,000 50 50 50 S0 50 $15,000 Measure I Fund(177) 50 5500 $750,000 $0 $0 50 5750,500 -,. ,-- Total Coste $15,000 $500 $750,000 50 -„ SO 5705.000 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. H 15 Project Number: 800-2013-18 IL Key: 1816 Object: Hellman Avenue from Base Line Road to 19th Street- Pavement Rehabilitation Hroject Location: - I �r .—Iq— r Hellman Avenue from Base Line r I 1 Road to 19th Street - ©w`:.—�w I I _f n r II �nu-41 r ; ' o ta� s nvs,xa t:-..te r. 4 g_.n 1. _ — C— .ti try:nay,ei! Est.Construction Start/End: 'Il _ I �u 8/2014-10/2014 '.S `.i��I' °. _�� `-� ' "A `� t , � J;�_J r_.y_T, 1 ,_PRUJECTIOCATION. 1; Project Status: - - 0esiBn / (i rsa, _r-Ia _:,--:-:.-1= f i ELcuu+r4rn Department: . i 3 , - "I _ u i Engineering C d Project Manager: `4"'n.I I I � I ,s dip I —e s uxeuc Romeo David Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use and rideability. In addition,the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle 2 rebate. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES so SO 50 $O $0 50 50 Design/Plan Review 525,500 $0 50 50 50 50 525,500 Right-of-Way $0 SO $0 $0 S0 $0 50 Construction SO $340,000 50 50 $0 50 5340,000 Inspection&Administration 50 535,000 SO 50 S0 SO $36,000 Contingency 50 534,000 $0 50 50 SO $34,000 Total Costs: 525,500 $410,000 $0 50 50 50 $435,500 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund(174) $25,500 $410,000 $0 SO 50 50 $435,500 Total Costs: $25,500 $410,000 50 SO $0 $0 $435,500 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. H 16 Project Number: 800-2012-29 IL Key: 1815 Object: Hermosa Avenue from Banyan Street to Wilson Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: �9 i G c `,,,,rc�r, ���Q� IgJ Hermosa Avenue from Banyan ,c J 15, ) I ` /f (�Nf�i11 1 Il`Street to Wilson Avenue 0 iI I� J " .- It 50N Ave _ J I 12 HER1 Ir 1 �i ,l k l' aeuenrnnv o 74N.,�ix�=.�1 r.r;nw I.. Its s I,j . .a sT7 Est.Construction Start/End: \ > s ,:� 9/2016-10/2016 ;uM-,tit:EN:51J 7.5:.e...,.. � r ,. tl� // i L ��ru —a r 8 nalnlr.ORCLOI — nN. ;1 I ,r :rte Project Status: - I �i �l. l so ;L_ Design I JYS�it rii It 11 ii i tZy Department: PROJECT"LOCATION {•.I Engineering `—I L—I I__� f1,..F.,.-.‘ a_y p ��BANYANy' v Project Manager: I II ` L I) ( ' I\\ Curt Billings B s I) (—'-'Ini°"zot*� Ig g 7�' �_Ir' e I Description: This project involves cold planning and localized asphalt removal and replacement, crack sealing,asphalt pavement overlay and striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. Project Cost Estimate(5): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2015/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES So $0 $0 $0 So SO SO Design/Plan Review 510,000 $500 50 SO 50 50 $10,500 Right-of-Way 50 S0 SO $0 So $0 50 Construction $0 $0 5230,000 $0 SO 50 $230,000 Inspection&Administration 50 $0 $10,000 $0 S0 SO $10,000 Contingency $0 50 $20,000 S0 50 50 $20,000 Total Costs: 510,000 $500 $260,000 $0 SO $0 $270,500 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Gas Tax RT7360(174) 510,000 $500 $0 $0 S0 $0 $10,500 Unfunded $0 $0 $260,000 50 $0 $0 $260,000 Total Cost:: iii00(1 $500 $260,000 SC -- SG $u $270,500 impact on Operations: Reduced street maintenance costs for pothole repairs and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. H17 Project Number: 800-2012-24 11.Key: 1793 Object: Lemon Avenue from Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue - Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: I !I II ,_.- JIJ.r-w II Lemon Avenue from Archibald �t I OR11<T� II CI ¢ A TIER Avenue to Haven Avenue -J a �\'' ��J `=su��:rlamce:;.R Y1 /ll` \a _JU=u= PROJECT LOCATION fl?< i w ) r �-- IQ 1(-J 4 Est.Construction Start/End: f j �_ ! a y •i �w �} - FY 201718 J r LIaeRrs0 I Ill t' a � ``rr 1< LL a / ill Iscus:Sr la 'c !8 CIS 1 < P il_i Q Y I_. KIN STAN 5"' fJ_ > w Project Status: I I N—E—) y r 4-___..7.--,.`• .."'Iu."-'_ > I r.- LemoNnVE J L- h ,J--__Jw,�J r I rc Design ` cs�r's'-s-(-11 5-" bF.ANT:F.sT..-.-..`._.a'.. I, A'mccgt-. - --.i �tNi;i,T II I ._.. _ w 1 �I 1 IL 1,1 VIA'LSPFRANZA�- V onisI DR__ r cDR , Department: 1 PRI L-DR < //JI S r w Engineering ` g B n ii.v.:.Al x.. VINEYARD JUNIOR NIGH ¢/ _q 'UAL-�Y'tN:SI It i Project Manager: HGHC No'AUL nLr°._gM*o" �, c Curt Billings 7, mom AVE ii 'Q.—^�I (� �•' Description: This project involves cold planning and localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt pavement overlay and striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condit ion,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. Project Cost Estimate(5): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 $0 $0 $0 50 SO $0 Design/Plan Review 510,000 5500 5500 $500 $0 $0 $11,500 Right-of-Way So S0 50 50 S0 $0 S0 Construction S0 $0 SO 50 $500,000 $0 $500,000 Inspection&Administration 50 5o 50 $0 $19000 50 510,000 Contingency $0 50 50 50 550,000 50 $50,000 Total Costs: 510,000 5500 5500 5500 5560,000 $0 5571,500 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Prop 42 Fund 11901 $10,000 SO 50 50 $0 So $10,000 Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund(174) 50 $500 5500 5500 5o 50 $1,500 Vnfund_od $0 50 50 50 5560,ouu 50 $560,000 Total Costs: 510,000 $500 $500 5500 5560,000 50 $571,500 Impact on Operations: Reduced street maintenance costs for pothole repairs and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. H18 Project Number: 800-2014-03 JL Key: 1022 Object: Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation at Various Locations Project Location: _ Various Locations ===ILL r { �•^r. 4. if 1 r it( „ �1 f3 I i ( 101 7- e L_ F i f s �i=i 7• t r \ i.Jl - J 41I IL ' :Tr j1wir 3 -i-r t l l ~- 5 —_. \ J J 0.44 x f _i c2t � t 'se w:.c: I ,y - .r \. y Est.Construction Start/End: 1 l I s� 'tit L ° s r 5/2015 x Ti- ..; .1 .i '?r'f�I -F' s JC J 1 JJ:7 it i ✓ EC f • r1 itr N i ' i Project Status: flr. .� hyll i' r 1 •.: , trT4LOCATION d y ,. �9"1 � Pl �� 1h Design •I s Jt�)' t1j y a`� r €_4 js.; j 11 • 1 1 II Ilt11L , — y r• L _1 =;_ .;, Department: I � "'?T'�7�.• -1 — 1 ._.1 .rte �_ 'f Engineering �T( 't 1! _ • g. 8 _ ,5, .. 1 i . Project Manager: \ —2 ---r—r- i-1, IL. '1 1 Romeo David t'z,llgn:� `�" — !; "rm.)l — .--1 1. ,i .� Description: This project involves slurry seals and asphalt overlays. Justification: This project if a slurry seal will seal the street thus extending the pavement life and if a pavement overlay will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. Project Cost Estimate(5): Expenditure/Category Last Fiscal Year 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 50 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $30,000 530000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $60,000 Right-of-way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 50 50 Construction $1,550,000 $800,000 $0 50 50 $0 52,350,000 Inspection&Administration $62,770 $49,000 S0 50 S0 $0 $111,770 Contingency 5150,000 $80,000 50 $0 $0 $0 $230,000 Total Costs: 51,792,770 5959,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 52J51.770 Project Funding: Funding Source Last Fiscal Year 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund(174) 51,721,380 5850,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,571,380 Prop 42 Fund(190) 571,390 $109,000 $0 $0 $0 50 5180,390 !oral Costs: 5 i,747711 59S9,000 SO So ' Su $0 $2,751,770 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. H 19 Project Number: 800-2012-30 - 11.Key: 1818 Object: Madrone Avenue from North of 9th Street -Widening Project Location: ! ' ..::: vp�" µCS Madrone Avenue from North of 7 /;°,tiP� f Ir 9th Street _....-4X°- GAr«e'�.0 PR OJECT LOCATIO av E111oA_vuArt J J Est.Construction Start/End: j w v--i r{4 RRtikv-RIE /�'- if / 6/2014-7/2014 - .!- ^'r ✓? > r, 52 II 'n 2 w iQ 2 W Y T z y F Z <, j 5 1 W K Le J C v f W 1 Project Status: a' Ij.1 m z Design and Construction > n "- 1 0 _SilfNq S >' LOS AMIGOS 1�•.1 Department: I ELEMENTARY I-A 12.4-0LUIT Engineering t a c l a ll �g-mow-,4( 4_i5s.7 i^ Project Manager: I y ,¢ I(1/ ^ , I ,. Curt Billings is i I I 5 7 \ r-ten,-Syc SIT 4 2: Description: This project adds 320 linear feet of street widening and 3 street lights along the frontage of the new Southwest Park that will be constructed concurrently. Justification: This project will provide ADA accessibility and improve pedestrian and vehicle safety along the steet frontage of the new Southwest Park. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 50 50 .50 So So 50 Design/Plan Review $0 $500 50 S0 SO S0 $500 Right-of-Way SO $0 $0 50 50 50 50 Construction 50 50 5114,200 50 50 50 5114,200 Inspection&Administration 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Contingency 50 $0 $13,000 50 50 50 $13,000 Total Costs: $0 5500 $127,200 50 50 50 $127,700 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Gas Tax RT7360(1741 $0 5500 $127,200 $0 50 50 5127,700 Total Costs: $0 5500 5127,200 So 50 50 5127,700 Impact on Operations: This project adds 3 street lights to Street Light Maintenace districts 5LO 2 and SLO 6. H 20 Project Number: 800-2012-26 JL Key: 1821 Object: Rochester Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Base Line Road -Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: :lit. —z^I•r�nrn�usur<. �_�NI�.,._,�� _ —J L��C I t" 7 ,1� Rochester Avenue from Foothill — Boulevad to Base Line Road '� QOL� l, S? •jj ' ` z L4: f =v '��_ ��_; m MA nC..ALI L tilN lx„n I .^�. �,�;%�1 a, = 1 X\ ��Y o ;> 1N TERRA VIS`4 /C'^j I i°-°I1 IST "VICTORIA B RS•� V RRA Vls RY�,�7R r t'r F'Vl.1Y }�°}"I Est.Construction Start/End: �MOVNT N VIEW PAFIKI G f 9/2016-10/2016 ik c=5 �/) h 2 t-,-1, C[1URCH=ST rrt1,� J / \� �•.-,fin b LL ----I'D: xR /�� -�lr^^^��p,;@,,ayl�t,�V vi �il_I1(SL r:R.TFPL Project Status: tILLIKEtr PARK / i �` q � b cc Design ////%/'� fm f ( j1 dl�ry_ NDR TI-1:1.14 INSTREE4�� 'tl' 7• V 3 A MFURU,s' - t ” I /r'Q�q.� /d rN 17a, ROJECT LOCATION Department: s R�C �,I I > '¢ x URIsG-LST I rcr'aV.1„..PF£ Engineering I j II u Tus .'.' UST fl 1 II al z l: t J ERV�:9ii u^ l Project Manager: q s /,: Curt Billings —`—T I w Ele(ILLtf L-Ii i�`�J� /y�5�'•✓� Description: This project involves cold planning and localized asphalt removal and replacement, crack sealing, asphalt pavement overlay and striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. Project Cost Estimate(5): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 $0 $0 $0 50 50 50 Design/Plan Review $10,000 5500 5500 $0 50 $0 $11,000 Right-of-Way 50 $0 S0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $520,000 $0 50 $520,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 510,000 50 50 510,000 Contingency S0 $0 $0 $60,000 50 $0 $60,000 Total Costs: $10,000 $500 $500 5590,000 50 $0 $601,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Measure I Fund(177) $10,000 $500 5500 $590,000 $0 $0 5601,000 Total Costs: $10,000 $500 $500 $590,000 $p 50 $601,000 Impact on Operations: Reduced street maintenance costs for pothole repairs and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. Fl 21 Project Number: 800-2014-09 N.Key: 1877 Object: . San Bernardino Road from Carnelian Street to Archibald Avenue -Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: i cx,'""'°'tr"^ —y I.n- 'a «,...,,,,. San Bernardino Road from I II_jw/ s L uwce oad ib I��If L_ a I Carnelian Street to Archibald =® ;� _— ' rehx,J- Aven H;ofl ��NV,ar.,.s., 7 II i ;_' ) . ', ;�1 it �� � �� �� x 3 N `�I` < • r Est.Construction Start/End: J \%y PROJECT LOCATION' ! <7 08/2015-10/2015 \ 4"c /v / --II s �i I " I ,r — T 1 �'--�=¢��! J }{ r. 3 I I s .,�II Ifs Project Status: c�ll I_.._�'i1'�.�� i 'l I _. ..-_. _(,L+--�^4M1' <criMi Design PC ramie SPORTS ccnn�� ' i _ s _ Department: ! 1i �L« r~ ^ESf �a— ,.�ua,,,�v. I L o , cucw I_ Engineering i ,� I�� Project Manager: I._ „ `� ; ��.�-,real tr��f y i Romeo David i_... ,!�; Y -`-.1 I S,1 0 !; W Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. In addition,the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle 3 rebate. Project Cost Estimate(5): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO $0 Design/Plan Review 50 $20,000 so $0 $0 SO $20,000 Right-of-Way SO $0 50 50 50 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 5245,000 SO 50 SO $245,000 Inspection&Administration SO 50 510,000 50 50 Contingency 50 510,000 $ 50 $0 S20,000 so So SO $20,000 Total Costs: So $20,000 $275,000 $0 50 $0 5295,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund(174) $0 $20,000 $275,000 50 $0 $0 $295,000 Total Costs: 50 $20,000 5275,000 $0 $0 $0 5295,000 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. I-1 22 Project Number: 800-2014-05 JL Key: 1878 Object: Spruce Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Base Line Road-Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: _ s i \ISpruce Avenue from Foothill w —/ COLDY LEWIS COMMUNITY CENTER ‘T ASE LINE-RD—LL Boulevard to Base Line Raod _ -! -_-- a > J ? I c o- 6 l DOy .A fdERi Ep_ ��c �` 4UYOTE CAN O1J PARK TER E LEFIENTARV d\ � ,L-(l am--(�{//EELEI Est.Construction Start/End: - F1 tt �--- iF ,jam 7?1 I ';, ' T- �,(} '--'� 08/2015 I rIAN(.ROV ST \ RU TH MUSSER, �` _' — Y_ N • H STR T PARK I �, /\h11DDLE 1 ' r� ` o,, :H,g7l 0' �J)' \\yCt�._(",. � i Project Status: PROJECT LOCATIO SF t uE PARK, � ' S"' 7 NESTGREENWAY PARK EMLOCK-ST� > \\ Try' MILL ,KEN PARK Design L / g x9Hronu-9i --t i YOYO�ECANYON LftLN--ST c I �, `) 'ELEMENTARY Department: I - \ PrRSEF6=1 y Engineering I \. -ALP M.LEWIS.PARK Al rOfln-S Ty j ItFG15'6T / J ii Project Manager: L FWiHILI AVE. U: > FOO-TI-L--BLVD i Romeo David c z Description: This project involves cold planing,localized asphalt removal and replacement,crack sealing,asphalt rubber hot mix overlay,traffic signal loop replacement,utility valves and manhole adjustments,and pavement striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending pavement life,use,and rideability. In addition,the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible for a CalRecycle 3 rebate. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES SO 50 50 $0 50 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $30,000 $0 So SO $0 530,000 Right-of-Way 50 50 $O SO So $O SO Construction 50 S0 $531,000 $0 $0 $0 $531,000 Inspection&Administration SO SO $15,000 $0 SO SO $15,000 Contingency S0 $0 $54,000 $0 S0 50 $54,000 Total Costs: $0 $30,000 $600,000 $0 SO $O $630,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund(174) 50 $30,000 $600,000 $0 Su $0 $630000 Total Costs: 50 630,000 $600,000 $0 SO $0 $630.000 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs,weed abatement and crack seal,thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. Fi23 Project Number: 800-2013-21 it Key: 1838 Object: Victoria Street from Etiwanda Avenue to East City Limits - Widening and Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: i Ir Victoria Street from Etiwanda ,? Avenue to East City Limit ^® ---------- N., — en-=--I 77 —Enxcr.oe —� ) \ rEZ,x%+e , m� ~ _ ,,,e:.max.`�J \:i MUxrvc i LL i GI — ( kgE4vJ e I`r_ i `.\�,�I r�.Le,1,�l� a IS Est.Construction Start/End: .,,,score ��`�- 4/2016-6/2016 I �rT.4-� -jl I_:^�� J PROJECT LOCATIO _... ,—,r = it Project Status: E wr.ES n yE I E*iwAreoa niGH P.Design 4,' Department: hNo--- ° -._ n. �,__„_ -?a-u av C ::ager `^"" r�. rrczna �� _ I -, r'` / . Cu rt Billings 771V'...era�.vmh r I-�-n .,_....�.,., ''—' ' / Description: This project involves curb and gutter, sidewalks, asphalt pavement, cold planning, ac overlay, striping and flashing beacon for pedestians crossing the street at Etiwanda High School. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition,extending the pavement life,use,and rideability. The project will also add sidewalks and a flashing beacon for improved pedestrian access to two local schools. Project Cost Estimate(5): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES SO 50 S0 50 So $0 SO Design/Plan Review $34,850 5500 50 50 50 50 535,350 Right-of-Way $0 SO SO $0 SO SO SO Construction 50 50 $324,000 $0 $0 50 5324,000 Inspection&Administration 50 50 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 Contingency 50 50 $32,000 50 SO SO $32,000 Total Costs: $34,850 $500 $406,000 50 $0 SO 5441,350 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Transportation Fund(124) $24,500 5500 $56,000 $0 $0 $0 $81,000 Measure I Fund(176) $10,000 $0 5350,000 $0 $0 50 $360,000 Total Costs: $34,500 $500 $406,000 50 $0 $0 $441,000 Impact on Operations: Will reduce routine maintenance costs for pothole and crack repairs, H 24 Project Number: 800-2012-22 11 Key: 1601 Object: Youngs Canyon Road from Koch Place to Cherry Avenue -Street Extension Project Location: o ,- d°'"r �$2' ,Y_i - c. l Youngs Canyon Road from Koch °a ('y,''� ne"�%. I'l\ , \\ E Place to Cherry Avenue f =_ .Lr %'r o- — 1`1 I .T 1 a f '1 ( ��!-'W�ILSON AVf I ._.�..-..-..-..�..�..-..-..�..-..�..�..-�..�..� � J1s n 7 ` / ` �1 ,cal-T Est.Construction Start/End: (�,{ , la , / 4/2015-10/2015 I ` \�- \\ - 7i ) ) \ I�^I PROJECT LOCATION 2 LEGACY PG n �1\\ 55 /! I, 1t —�-i ' J) 1 Project Status: I t./�. \ IL-_,., Design AN HO suMMAIT Akr! I. •. Y '._ .a., � �A � . !•� i, - 111 ri 1 :. 7 I r % - , sr i 1 -.-_ _.14I - i c — - T I I I ! rr Traffic i N Projects included in this section are typically those that will promote safe and efficient traffic circulation per State and local design standards. Many of these projects include new signals, upgrades to intersections - such as additional turn pockets or signal timing upgrades - as well as synchronization and coordination projects that promote traffic flows along the City's heaviest traveled arterial streets. Traffic Projects are typically funded via Transportation Development Funds (124), Measure I (I77), Gas Tax Funds (I 70, 172, and 174), Street Lighting Districts and some grant funding, Project List& FY 2014-15 Expenditures Sources of Funding for FY 2014-I 5 I. 6th St.@ Utica Ave- New Traffic $12,500 Installation 2. Carnelian St. @ Banyan St. $300,000 New Traffic Signal Installation 3. Milliken Ave.Traffic Signals $125,000 Upgrade Left Turn Phases 4. Traffic Management Center- $280,000 Upgrade Project Citywide Total $717,500 $717,500 ■Transportation 41 1 1 Project Number: 800-2014-12 lb Key: 1889 Object: 6th Street at Utica Avenue-Traffic Signal Installation Project Location: 6th Street at Utica Avenue ._ • - � , 1� 9 Lc -.irsr z_.2....--------- g -t ,A EMPIRE Est Construction Start/End: PRiOJECT LOCAYIOM \ 3/2016-5/2016 I1 i (� Ii Project Status: C;) � Design m :2'4- I i it _ —uiiiVi-- - w Department: i s Engineering Project Manager: EMPIRE t IIJason Welday - Description: The scope of work to be performed in general consists of,but is not limited to,installation of traffic signals and related equipment at 6th Street and Utica Avenue. Justification: The installation of traffic signals will improve traffic safety and reduce traffic congestion. Project Cost Estimate(5): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 50 S0 $0 S0 S0 S0 Design/Plan Review So $12,500 50 S0 S0 50 $12,500 Right-of-Way 50 50 . 50 So $0 $0 SO Construction SO 50 $250,000 So $0 $0 S250,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $12,500 $0 $0 $0 $12,500 Contingency 50 50 $25,000 SO SO $D $25,000 Total Costs: 50 512,500 5287,500 50 50 So $300,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Transportation(124) $0 $12,500 $287,500 $0 50 50 5300,000 Total Costs: SO $12,500 $287,500 $0 $0 SO $300,000 Impact on Operations: The City will be responsible to pay for the cost of electricity and maintenance.The estimated cost of electricity and maintenance for a traffic signal is$2,500 per year. ( t Project Number: 800-2014.08 11 Key: 1887 Object: Carnelian Street at Banyan Street-Traffic Signal Installation Project Location: I 1 .. _.._..- Carnelian Street at Banyan Street I j 'a" Ia 1:13 Tn — -, IN l is ..— --J�Q - v —erwq?aeitCFQt_ .an p>:reiN'sv r'r_—x__— rn �gg'in c. 1� a Est.Construction Start End: I{:4 a i5 lu�;u+tcu iro If�i ULTOLmm� 11/2014-1/2015 / -. -�5 'u —'�—=> > IS 'C JUNIOR HIGH w r 'III II,�y_s_; It-us-1j_,'A�.N._vE Li— Project Status: W ¢ 7I(h, I' i, I' a °• I I r., I� 7t j3 I° Design != ' PROJECT ���' �L 5 LOCATION Saar: rn l /1_fLJ U I Nct..aT —�_ i Department: I y (lam. bu e,IEroe (3 ✓i s l (1�; {II S' Engineering 15 1 {„ `� IW 9 �i l I if �� 1€ ems= '�_L _Mne. —I WM-BERYL.PARH Project Manager: �RenttR] _ 1( EAST Pal Jason Welda y ' I• — Description: The scope of work to be performed in general consists of,but is not limited to,installation of traffic signals and related equipment at Carnelian Street and Banyan Street. Justification: The installation of traffic signals will improve traffic safety and reduce traffic congestion. Project Cost Estimate(5): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 50 50 50 50 50 Design/Plan Review $0 $12,500 So s0 5o 50 512,500 Right-of-Way 50 50 50 50 So So 50 Construction 50 5250,000 $0 S0 $o $0 5250,900 Inspection&Administration 50 512,500 $0 50 50 50 512,500 Contingency 50 525,000 50 50 50 50 525,000 Total Costs: 50 $300,000 $0 $0 50 50 $300,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017118 2018/19 TOTAL Transportation(124) 50 5300,000 50 50 $o 50 $300,000 Total Costs: $0 $300,000 so so 50 so 5300,000 Impact on Operations: The City will be responsible to pay for the cost of electricity and maintenance.The estimated cost of electricity and maintenance for a traffic signal Is$2,500 per year. 12 Project Number: 800-2014-06 1L Key: 1875 Object: Milliken Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard Traffic Signals - Upgrade Various Left Turn Phases Project Location' %-1 i `7`� H• z '=1,,! ,; r"– y_e�g- ,. Various Locations along Milliken ` I 2\ _.'!.'_i_'°.r _ _ — q? i`, • Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard - . Er L II-4..,Li, —7�"',\ _ 3_�i =�:_' R cj I ' I'lilt K 3 r �— r w,.r �� , aa I .1 e11 r. 9 I e v "% � '�,-4,k,r~rt�,� -111,:-..--,-1,h t s `] r i r"! f.. a_.L' ln•s S I �� i r I Est.Construction Start/End: > 5 s e t__, v:- j lil—'–- 'PROJECT LOCATION 3 f '�l• 1/2015-4/2015 =—j-2– . F— 1 u Ji'T 'I� �Y �. I �y C;„ PROJECTLOCATlo, , I ( c (TT, ! ' II`� L, 1 ' zj tr Project Status: 1 1--� = r +Mt- 6I–.2, tt I i.+ r `.T,. I a Design 1 1 ,P2 • eeu- c ,...�,,1,^D', Il--.17,.. "`i Fr_ I. P� -.n u L;1 _, d ;i-`_iz,L°" . ' °r t££ �-i?,a?�.1`E-iJ�LS?1 tr nN i • `V I •'` Department: y ' (J LY r�c p..-It c r 1 t Engineering 1 1t� r Jy'I� •" Z ----!_t 1i-,�I q I { I .r 04 F d a .i. � I��x i✓ _ , is ti l▪ i‘.. j—I}� % I �! Project Manager: f ' I-7---C–'j-.17--c,.;1.1 s y.L.k .G. �LJ bt�1y @ ° 11 Jason Welday I s-----f..:`r/ –i ; . �--I– L"▪ ' \A I1LGi $ t s _ .z 1 Description: The scope of work to be performed in general consists of,but is not limited to,removing protected-permissive left turn phasing and replacing with protected left turn phasing for the traffic signals on Milliken Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard. Justification: The project will improve safety for vehicles and pedestrians by providing an exclusive phase for left turn vehicle movements.In addition, pedestrian crossings will occur separate from left turn movements, which previously occurred simultaneously with protected-permissive traffic signal equipment. Project Cost Estimate(S): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES SO 50 $o 50 50 So S0 Design/Plan Review SO $5,000 $0 $0 50 • so 55,000 Right-of-Way SO 50 $0 So $0 So $0 Construction $0 $100,000 So $o So $0 5100,000 Inspection&Administration 5O $10,000 50 $0 $0 SO $10,000 Contingency 50 $10,000 $0 So So SO $10,000 Total Costs: 50 $125,000 50 $0 SO 50 $125,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Transportation(124) S0 5125,000 S0 So SO $0 $125,000 Total Costs: $0 $125,000 SO $0 $0 SO $125,000 Impact on Operations: After installation and configuration of the protected left turn traffic signal equipment, no additional impacts on operations will be present. 13 Project Number: 800-2012-17 JL Key: 1831 Object: Traffic Management Center- Upgrade Project Citywide Project Location: u t----.. t .741"7-1.i▪I 1 '� ' 1 I - r> .:...u_::::,.::--3,---, Base Line Road and Foothill ®J emu} y ii "cr r �.f t r _ Boulevard from West City Limits to ti -. _ 1_ Y II v ('II Y -,j East City Limits -y I sJt 1C -i I...-T, �T"7.0 1 ' rtt r 1 ^ N r � � ( tr r�� N' � t Z '" 't-- peRoJEcT`OC r Tr"'77 I S C f j ' I r. . -1— ▪ 11a i 1, tv e ��' / (2=r tll 1H, ,.41 rite C i:Q .w i rg ti 'Pu• Est.Construction Start/End: r , . ,I 1 w[ systi s ' " " ubrc fr:ts.VL r sL;, y tilL ,7 I rr 12/2014-6/2015 Ltl ' 1• del_ll at 1 f j,. r-I 1 .N PROJECTLOCATION ' ' °er c ..'-Y t -c 1 I a 1.0r 4 r fr S.'u.'Status: 'l Y jt : o a n ps-r <«'y 1 t I Design a1€ j I Lt7:,71: " j 4 i Department: • l - • Engineering .) nk'1 t w i f- 5_ i'„1LR 1 ..L la I � II! ens.-_.1 A:47 J 1." (.4 _, _ . u; _. qi = 111 Project Manager: _ iI ,- { f s. Jason Welday - ;t „ Description: The scope of work to be performed in general consists of,but is not limited to.upgrading system hardware and software at the Base Line Road and Foothill Boulevard intersections,and integrating these intersections into the Traffic Management Center. Justification: The project will upgrade communications to enable better monitoring, re-timing and coordination of the City's traffic signals for improved traffic flow and safety. Project Cost Estimate(5): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Consultant Services $0 $17,000 $0 So So $0 511,000 Staff Training SO SO 50 50 $0 So 50 Design/Equipment Specifications SO $11,000 50 $0 $0 $O $11,000 Procurement/Construction $278,000 $220,000 50 SO S0 $0 $498,000 System Testing and Integration $16,000 516,000 50 SO $0 $0 $32,000 Contingency $6,000 $22,000 $o $0 $0 $0 $28,000 Total Costs: $300,000 5280,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Transportation(124) $300,000 5280,000 $0 So 50 $O 5580,000 Total Costs: $300,000 $280,000 $o SO 50 50 5580,000 Impact on Operations: Communication to Base Line Road and Foothill Boulevard will improve maintenance, staff efficiencies and reduce related costs. These system upgrades will oleo ercvidc substantial iuipiuvements in system-wide signal timing and coordination,improving operational efficiencies,while also resulting in fewer citizen complaints. 14 I e wr•�.r'J ■ _y 't P' Future & Unfunded Projects included in this section are those that have been identified as being a priority project, but lack dedi- cated funding for the upcoming fiscal year. Projects designated as 'Unfunded' could be waiting on grant approval, or perhaps until new special fund monies become available. Projects showing dedicated funding sources, but which are slated to occur in future fiscal years have mostly likely been delayed due to issues with the future funding of operating expenses. In many cases funds can be found for the capital construction of a project like a new library or community center, but City management has not yet devised a way to fund the neces- sary staff or overhead expenses required to run a new facility. We have included this section to illustrate those priority projects that did not make it into the FY 2014/15 budget for either of these reasons. Staff is actively pursuing grant or other fundraising opportunities for several of the projects in this section. Project List& Future Expenditures Project List& Future Expenditures I. Archibald Ave.Church to Palo Alto, $1,215,000 18.Pacific Electric Trail Enhancements- $110,000 Storm Drain West to East City Limits 2. Archibald Ave,from N/O Norbrook $103,000 19,Red Hill Prk-Pedestrian Paseo $1 00,000 to Carrari St 3. Central Prk-Replace Flooring $125,000 20.Safety Lighting-upgrades @ Various $150,000 Intersections 4. Civic Ctr- Earthquake Strapping $50,000 5. Civic Ctr and Public Sfty Bldg- $20,000 21.Upper Cucamonga SD Phase III $3,900,000 ADA Assessment Exterior Glass Total $88,955,500 6. Etiwanda Ave Electric Line Exten- $602,500 lion,Arrow to Foothill Potential Future Sources of Funding 7. Etiwanda Ave-Grade Separation @ $40,000,000 Metrolink Tracks $602,500 8. Etiwanda Creek Park-Phase II $5,580,000 $100 000 110,00. 9. Fire District-Banyan Station 175 $2,500,000 $100,000 $53,918,000 Expansion $195,000 10. Fire District-Central Station 178 $8,000,000 $450,000 (New station) $5,580,000 II.Fire District-Operation/Dispatch $11,000,000 $28,000,000 Bldg 12. Fire District-San Bernardino Station $6,500.000 172 Relocation 13. Foothill Blvd from Grove-San $4,630,000 Bernardino Rd—Widen Median .Unknown ❑ Fire Capital Projects 14.Haven Ave from Wilson-Vivienda- $1 25,000 Community Trail .Park Development . Transportation 5. Hermosa Ave from the Alta Loma $2,245,000 n PD 85 Redemption ❑ Citywide Infrastructure Basin to Wilson-SD I I 16. Lemon Avenue from Haven to 1 300 $1,700.000 ❑Beautification 0 Capital Reserves ft west-Storm Drain 17. Miller Ave at East Ave-New Traffic $300,000 Signal Installation 0 Municipal Utility J Project Number: 800-2012-14 M.Key: 1805 Object: Archibald Avenue from Church Street to Palo Alto Street-Storm Drain Project Location: TI I / /.p" J I 1 I Lnu.i_ Archibald Avenue from Church 'EST_ BASE 1LINE RD 1 w- StreettoPaloAltoStreet 'Cr EAST F'I ( ( ( 1 Q/ I PEPP_EIR ST I{ C I- ///71 I u+ J I ARCHIBA`D LIBRARY a IR,SNW OAD Sr . :r. I/ u, C7 iv; 1 I —may_ (a -J :c=1'2�.--w fl :In r .0 •i - aka I I �i ,/?[ G < 'Q AL LIEN S I t Z P. I� Q w W -rmTrT ;= I 1 }� Il IL I 'C .5 Est.Construction Start/End: = :- 0 ;c G, ,-pALALT0=5T r=-w > H To be determined -w—Y—' 6 . w—O ' >(= -PROJECT LOCATION !' > w Project Status: Si BA t "\ r'f g !i a ti... r� j->. s$ - It 1 �� Design and Construction li Ia � 2 )I_!-'¢. ° II CUC AMONG A, :� '� i9�-,w ((--�-tr rc_c n NOLEW O0_S.T_ F MIDDLE •:Q :_ Ia ,> C m Department: (y/ I_ IQ ¢ ,C ID, Engineering l:F Y.Ew_S/T IC—' 1.1. , :� ti j Q �_ "S: 1" - 1• •a o Project Manager: Romeo David L.1NGy.I ST II( SL ALT�C1N:It�R� , I- I I fi��L'ANGSd,ON:STI I I) a /� I C. Description: Construct a Master Planned Storm Drain,install catch basins,manholes,and laterals. Justification: This project will improve drainage within the area. Project Cost Estimate(5): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 ISO TOTAL Environmental/NPDES So $0 50 $0 50 50 50 Design/Plan Review $0 $0 50 $0 SO 535,000 $35,000 Right-of-Way $0 S0 SO $0 50 SO 50 Construction SO So $0 50 50 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Inspection&Administration SO SO $0 $0 $0 580,000 $80,000 Contingency S0 SO $0 50 50 5100,000 $100,000 Total Costs: 50 50 $0 50 SO $1,215,000 $1,215,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 T8O TOTAL Unfunded 50 50 50 50 50 51,215,000 51,215.000 Total Costs: $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $1,215,000 51,215,000 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance,potholes,sand bags for storm water protection and storm water cleanup,thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. J1 Project Number: 800-2013-11 1L Key: 1830 Object: Archibald Avenue from North of Norbrook to Carrari Street-Community Trail West Side West side of a �,��' West side of Archibald Avenue from north of Norbrook to Carrari � Street ua5r� I if ri t__ccc+Mu Nnil Nn T L I our r,It(CE'r FARM.-R, PROJECT LOCATION .r-I dcttcx, 'R„' ____- II d Est.Construction Start End: � 6a_rr Ki; To be determined / �,/ I"—j Ps 8 1 ¢ J'o + a<—�r.L >J w C (I zw n • °° i'o r Project Status: r I(.%.Design y e TA -0R oa^ J. I cu�� um l 07 2 wtie[oR 1 ,URhF, R1 a// Department: Engineering 0 1lianiSt Hn m ��ri [ Project Manager: FIRE TATONQ et- (1:2 ♦ J —R.Ntd.zr_,J € Romeo David COMMUNITY PARK Description: Construction of an equestrian trail on the west side of Archibald Avenue. Project includes installation of two rail PVC fence, decompose granite and mow curbs. Justification: This project will connect to the existing community trail at the west side of Achibald Avenue and is part of the trail master plan.It will also improve the appearance of the west side of Archibald Avenue. Project Cost Estimate 1$): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TOD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 S0 50 50 50 so 50 Design/Plan Review $10,500 $0 $0 .$0 $0 $0 $10,500 Right-of-Way $0 $0 so 50 50 50 50 Construction $0 50 So $0 50 588,200 $88,200 Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 50 50 55,000 55,000 Contingency 50 $o 50 $0 S0 $9,800 $9,800 Total Costs: $10,500 $0 $0 S0 50 $103,000 $113,500 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Beautification Fund(110) $10,500 S0 50 $0 50 $0 $10,500 Unknown $0 $0 S0 50 $0 $103,000 $103,000 Total Costs: 510,500 $0 50 $0 $0 5103,000 .5113,500 ' Impact on Operations: This project will add an additional quarter mile to the City's trail system, which will require trash removal,weed abatement, and routine maintenance. However, it will also remove 1,000 linear feet of City maintained public landscape,saving the City approximately 51,100 year. Staff is currently seeking grant funds for construction, J2 Project Number: JL Key: Object: 5295 Central Park - Replace Flooring Project Location: ? �-' Central Park '411--.0./.174:5$2 cr.�J /oy S/d'F LervFli �`.-='�` lic` h61'1 xr�� /) ti Ill"¢'—`_ ®. ��L / l Sl oothAn) �� Z El + r,� N PROJECT LOCATION >��``'�� t __ 4' f/(f/fr f/1 J N\ � p r\ ���V_ FAIHFSN CV(hY /^� �j• i ��) r `` u Est.Construction Start/End: k!TtiaATa_c r (W %'�L) �� �` (� 1i To be determined (� PAC FIC ELECTRIC TRAIL 1 Project Status: 4/.9 J,-- ��� Design (' .P l` RANCHO CUCAMONGA CENTL PARK, 2 Department: U i Public Works Services BASE LINE R. Project Manager: Ty Quaintance --n- 4 I�L'EM1ISPH§70 j ('-"� 11 Description: Replace flooring in the Drier Hall and the Rancho Cucamonga Hall at the Goldy S.Lewis Community Center. Justification: The flooring in these two meeting halls are deteriorating as a result of heavy use. For safety and aesthetic reasons,the flooring needs to be replaced. Project Cost Estimate(5): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPOES 50 SO 50 50 SO 50 $0 Design/Plan Review $5,000 $0 $0 $0 S0 50 55,000 Right-of-Way 50 $0 $0 50 SO 50 $0 Construction $0 50 $0 SO $0 $125,000 $125,000 Inspection&Administration 50 $0 $0 SO S0 $0 $0 Contingency SO $0 $0 $0 SO 50 SO Total Costs: 55,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $125,000 $130,000 Project Funding: funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD TOTAL Captial Reserve(O25) $5,000 SO SO $0 SO $125,000 5130,000 Total Costs: 55,000 $0 50 $0 $0 5125,000 5130,000 Impact on Operations: With the continuous daily events scheduled in these main hails, staff will need to coordinate with C5D so that a sufficient block of time is set aside for the contractor to remove and replace the marmoleum in Drier and Rancho Cucamonga Halls, J3 Project Number: 1L Key: Object: Civic Center-Earthquake Strapping Project Location: J I. --L. 10500 Civic Center Drive ® a?E1s!_ �! 1 o_hi Est.Construction Start/End: Jr „7 IT ` I°I To be determined [ILA ;`� ,IA \ A /���- ; `( 6=4e'l'Y•.ice � 'RCS CLR:E 5 TAr1ON Project Status: __clmEccnteR-:aixma(),Al yen, Design ,- PROJECT LOCATIO \\_./-7 l l Department: in_______t- 1 f I sr Public Works Services — z Project Manager: I < I t 1 $ ARPaw.rn Ty quaintance 11.-4 Iv iLlisc-i I_FmI 1' Description: Install earthquake strapping to City equipment(including file cabinets)throughout the Civic Center. Justification: Shaking caused by a strong earthquake may tip over or move office equipment thereby increasing chances of injury or damage. Installation of earthquake strapping will secure equipment in place. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES SO S0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 SO S0 So $0 50 SO Right-of-Way SO $0 SO S0 50 50 SO Construction So $0 50 $0 SO $50000 $50,000 Inspection&Administration SO SO 50 $0 So SO SD Contingency SO 50 50 SO 50 SO $0 Total Costs: S0 SO SO 50 50 $50,000 $50,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 . 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD TOTAL Capital Reserve(025) 50 50 $0 $0 $0 550,000 550,000 Total Costs: SO 50 $0 $0 50 550,000 550,000 Impact on Operations: Temporary inconvenience to Civic Center personnel while earthquake strapping being installed to their equipment. J4 Project Number: II_Key: Object: 5502 Civic Center and Public Safety Building-ADA assessment of Exterior Doors Project Location: I =..r r.r xrrs.r-)> \, s_ r 10500 Civic Center Drive ® =QeS5...t) '_— rao Nu —..ei.era,em r� 7.'crILCx,�s—� Est.Construction Start/End: r� 'a L�, N To be determined �_$ r \� �- ` Y �:; cNY HALL ['L4•iK�t_� ?L*r1LICE STATION Project Status: o =-i._crnr-cenrcrC �Y� 4n Design i I \\ \ r PROJECT LOCATION + \ Department: i-�� �—ma Public Works Services > 1.:'a.t w <aeov wF Project Manager: Ty Quaintance 1I 10.I iAOut i I kl I( Description: Conduct an assessment of public and employee entrances to the City Hall and Public Safety Buildings to meet current ADA accessibility standards. Justification: The City Hall and Public Safety Buildings are over 25 years old and no longer meet ADA accessibility standards. An ADA assessment should be compiled outlining required modifications on the exterior doors to meet current ADA standards. Project Cost Estimate(5): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 50 $0 $o 50 50 Design/Plan Review $0 $0 520,000 50 50 . $0 $20,000 Right-of-Way $0 50 50 $o 50 50 $0 Construction $0 $0 SO SO $0 $0 $0 Inspection&Administration $0 50 So $0 50 Se $0 Contingency $0 $0 50 50 $0 SO $0 Total Costs: 50 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Capital Reserve(025) 50 S0 $20,000 So 50 $0 520,000 Total Costs: $0 SO $20,000 $0 $0 50 $20,000 Impact on Operations: No Impact. J5 Project Number: it.Key: 1885 Object: Etiwanda Avenue Electric Line Extension from Arrow Route to Foothill Boulevard Project Location: &O 1 PAUL BIi Ni LIBRARY ' 5 I D I Lc Etiwanda Avenue Electric Line I �� PERDEW :- NOR r.H:MAIN5 RElr,.Ih.J_ >, T ELEt4ENTAIRY� Extension from Arrow Route to 11 i / ) ) 1 Foothill Boulevard w '/y >. Z CCL-AfiET'C Olr :N�. Fl 1LIIJII1p ?=V IR SAII I-Eg5•-7m ��`// G IA:DR�� i,Grin s' 11 >��j i GA RI .IA% RK I�SL V{CTO @IA'GARDENS_L�N��" 'Est.Construction Start/End: 1 III\ /1 J r� To be determined y r w p 1 / e—¢17 OSH CCBLVO- t vlt.e-s, ..I Project Status: �� y✓/f' t $�l P5 Design PRO) CE T LOCATION I`V A/E t �we II l� Department: ��/�/?i t /` COMPLEX ( l i Engineering ^,/ �^`' 1 J NY_OR�..�:� 7 �•�. i I R �� Project Manager: „r) Fred Lyn ` ' ARROW_WE _ nr rile I IL Description: Distribution Line Extension east of the I-15 freeway to service vacant parcels on the corner of Foothill Blvd and Etiwanda Ave with RCMU electricity. Justification: Line extension is needed to extend power service on Etiwanda Avenue to service vacant parcels on the corner Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. The City paid SCE exit fees for the right to service any load associated with a newly constructed facility or undeveloped parcels that has never been interconnected with Edison;this falls under that category. Project Cost Estimate($): . Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 50 SO S0 S0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $0 52,500 $0 50 SO $2,500 Right-of-Way $0 S0 SO $o SO $0 So Construction $0 50 5500,000 $o So So 5500,000 Inspection&Administration $p $0 50 $0 $0 S0 50 Contingency $0 SO 5100,000 $0 50 50 $100000 Total Costs: $0 S0 $602,500 $0 $0 $0 $602,500 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/1- 015 -• - - - '_[_? 20:7/10 201B/13 TOIAt' Municipal Utility(Fund 705) $0 SO $602,500 $0 SO $0 $602,500 Total Costs: So $0 $602,500 So So S0 $602,500 Impact on Operations: The increased electricity load will provide additional revenue to RCMU. J6 • Project Number: JL Key: 1076 Object: Etiwanda Avenue- Grade Separation at Metrolink Tracks Project Location: _/ 1 C �" Etiwanda Avenue from 6[h Street ~ AP.RQW-R IL ii 1 f to Arrow Route f• q i ! PROJECT LOCATION 3; Ai riW -WHITXRAM:AVQ:r Est.Construction Start/End: To be determined An;RAILROAD � � /j r ■ Project Status: l _•�•,_.•_•• Design –•—�.�•�–•_._.. Department: f r s @ STI` Engineering v, }– c Y Project Manager: a 22 ejit !I& Curt Billings 8 z i Description: Prepare preliminary design drawings for a future grade separation on Etiwanda Avenue at the Metrolink Railroad Crossing south of Whitram Avenue. Justification: This project will improve safety and traffic circulation on Etiwanda Avenue. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 50 50 50 So So 50 Design/Plan Review 5337,000 $0 50 50 50 $1,000,000 $1,337,000 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,500,000 53,500,000 Construction 50 $o 50 5o 50 $32,000,000 $32,000,000 Inspection&Administration 50 50 5o so so $600,000 $500,000 Contingency 50 $0 S0 SO 50 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 Total Costs: $337,000 $0 $0 50 50 540,000,000 540,337,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/1.7 2017/18 TBD TOTAL Transportation Fund(124) 5337,000 $0 50 $0 SO $5,000,000 55,337,000 Unknown $0 50 50 50 $0 535.000,000 $35.000.000 Total Costs: 5337,000 $0 $0 50 50 540,000,000 $40,337,000 Impact on Operations: Added maintenance costs for a new bridge will be determined during design phase. J7 Project Number: JL Key: 1664 Object: Etiwanda Creek Park- Phase II Project Location: _...-_.. II ' ` ' 5939 East Avenue _ � 1 cnl.ArmA cuu.N. non eLCMENTAPY ;, E71WAN'1AGReCii c ornMuNrh PARK O LY n 1 «rPI 'f iN w.eomre O0.MIGN _-_.O -- �`-•_-- eAN.Ar ST Est.Construction Start/End: � f 'l" - y,=�I ;`; .,,,,rewvNr cr To be determined (� ` '= - I`I PROJECT LOCATION. =1_ : , ii WILL MAPLL el 3 Project Status: i-+_- -; j' rap4orr nor �1� `� U L Design I .�� ...,,,.n __ � Department: J j Community Services/Parks /- ��' floI,-PA<aveA Project Manager: ---- - - - — v — — - kilo Nettie Nielsen t r—___ (72n-.'rcr—n- _s„e,ryq '_.�C Description: This project involves the construction of additional athletic fields which include multi-use recreation fields, tennis courts, a"wet" play area,a 10,000-15,000 square foot community building,storage/maintenance facility and additional parking. Justification: The City Council identified this project as a goal for FY2007-08. Project Cost Estimate(5): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDE$ $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO Design/Plan Review $159,230 S0 50 $0 S0 50 $159,230 Right-of-Way 50 So So 50 50 S0 $0 Construction SO 50 $0 50 50 $5,580,000 $5,580,000 Inspection&Administration $0 50 $0 50 $0 SO $0 Contingency S0 SO SO SO $0 $0 SO Total Costs: $159,230 50 50 50 $0 55,580,000 $5,739,230 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/16 TOTAL Park Development(120) $159,230 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,580,000 $5,739,230 Total Costs: $159,230 50 50 50 50 $5,580,000 $5,739,230 Impact on Operations: Completion of this project will add a new facility to the City's inventory which tei!!require operational extendlutPS 10 maintenance,staffing,overhead and utilities. Initial estimates place the cost of maintaining two addional fields at$300,000-5450,000 per year. J8 Project Number: 11 Key: 1779 Object: Fire District- Banyan Staton (175) Expansion Project Location: Iffss--4._ . RD. ��i f�fj 11108 Banyan Street north side of r SCI I iI `Il irr- Ban an Street J i it -=I_ Fr _ r—, PROJECT �` „. a_1/ LOCATION --� ="' CHAFFEY c - ,/ Est.Construction Start/End: --s. -'•��� COLLEGE To be determined -f-t t. 'i! = t;R Y Da ri -, LOS n OSOS I _jl F =a'f-" HIGH SCHOOL! Project Status: J _ 1�/J 1 - I :Art-- ; a --:-'47-- : Design pending-project on hold ! , l 1 fi5NNAA ij' jc-1-x.0 �C (�� ^-� 1 LE EN C�/ /Vt i I i_ Hil I I '��T i/ 1` Department: _�L i i �I III _ 117 ;� :1` t I' Il I ;7(/� ��� L—I 'V/ \/t, �� /�C Fire Protection District If__j, i in I, l� ��� Project Manager: I p4' ( x — ,�P� — II c.k�..--r- - 210 ---�- _ _ Chief Mike Bell/Pamela Pane — --;- - - _ Ys- -r D =ni if. r-71 .-i Inns i 1 it 7. In Description: Expansion of the existing facility to accommodate additional services operating out of that facility, primarily apparatus storage. Utilized for the Technical Rescue and Wildland Fire Response programs. Justification: The Banyan Station houses specialized service resources that are currently parked outside and subject to wear and tear from the elements. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD TOTAL • Environmental/NPDES $0 SD SD $0 S0 SO S0 Design/Plan Review SO SO 50 so S0 5500,000 5500,000 Right-of-Way $0 SO SO S0 50 SO 50 Construction So SD SO $0 50 52,000,000 52,000,000 Inspection&Administration 50 $0 S0 SO 50 $0 SO Contingency SO SO SO 50 50 $0 SO Total Costs: S0 $0 $0 SO $0 $2,500,000 52,500,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD TOTAL Fire Capital Projects(288) 50 50 SD SO $0 52,500,000 52,500,000 Total Costs: $0 50 50 50 50 52.500,000 525O0,0nn Impact on Operations: No additional personnel costs. Slightly increased operations and maintenance costs for utilities due to increased square footage. J9 Project Number: it Key: 1645 Object: Fire District-Central Station (178) Project Location: - -' ' - Within the boundary of south of I ,=i 1\` k:?- f_ L __ d�I`r-+2...-,- ---C, ___.-V. ..-0 IJ base line Road, north of foothill P 11 `l Boulevard, east of Haven Avenue L !J I InI� ASE LANE}2D ti ^-'-4 t-d= and west of Milliken Avenue I i o C s *a x if e i _I f l LyA C � l i t ,--4.--- � 2 1� Est.Construction Start/End: III ii p it I ;..�/,' '%ft1 'P,Th P z ��n�L To be determined R 7 i � 4 �//�ryn �''�,,,�� - w lJ I�l` Project Status: l I i_ I it' 7 i qy r�s /ub ii a n:45”->Y-,y 1 ,° ••— s PROJECT 2 Choose New Location and �__ii .5 Y;(96 1- .1iP r i at / tiSIIrj LOCATIO squire property _ z iii y/ +;,�/ rg / i f i.5 Department: ¢ (.1/,/,,,�"s/.�+� '`e �,,s'O ` w/: � t Fire Protection District i '� $Y = Ji r '��nf i a''0,,,./t� ,il // , �1• I_._,Q„ ��—�I I1 •'OTHILL BLVD. Project Manager: l_0 J L_,/ • \ I I! Chief Mike Bell/Pamela Pane �I—11 ��_ um, IaT Hwu \ �) �\ Description: New Fire Station construction. New property for this station is being identified. Justification: New Fire Station was recommended in the Fire District's 2005 Strategic Plan. This station will serve the center of the Rancho Cucamonga community,providing the area with emergency services for fire suppression and life safety. Project Cost Estimate 1$1: • Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 50 50 50 50 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 50 so S0 50 $0 SO Right-of-Way So SO $o $0 SO 50 50 Construction $o 50 50 50 50 $8,000,000 Sa000,o0o Inspection&Administration SO $0 $0 SO 50 50 50 Contingency So SO $0 50 50 50 50 Total Costs: SO $0 SO SO 50 $8,000,000 58,000,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD TOTAL Fire Capital Projects(288) 50 5o SD $0 SO $8,000,000 58,000,000 Total Costs: SO 50 SO 5O Sn 58npn000. $s000000 Impact on Operations: Annual station operations and maintenance costs will depend on the station size and staffing costs at the time of construction. Designs with greater active/passive energy conservation and greater xeriscape will cost less to operate. Capital equipment purchase of an engine. J 10 Project Number: JL Key: 1392 Object: Fire District- Operations/Dispatch Building • Project Location: I i _I I L Northwest corner of Civic Center `�-teixna>, ' Drive and Utica Avenue > � til w p- f=13/4:41T;;<.,,rL Est.Construction Start/End: - < ^o°e . j 1 ii To be determined = {) 4 ;\\,.. �/� �! ? -I CITY HALL CESgeRTJ :.TP I:LICE STATION Project Status: p > �'�- On Hold HATARSAI WA, — Ervlr,.ceN,Tef�ol: j Department: PROJECT LOCATIOfd-�� ji Fire Protection District :�Re�rvss+nR I: 'oal Project Manager: — "—�-- — 1pl ARROW R ft Chief Mike Bell/Pamela Pane r'a't j I 42_ I l PAPMnnrr.�, � I Description: This project will construct a building to house Fire District Headquarters personnel and a possible dispatch center. Justification: Fire District Administration personnel have outgrown the current area in the Civic Center building. A new facility was recommended in the 2005 Strategic Plan to consolidate Fire Administration functions. There may be a future need to add a dispatch center. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES SO $0 50 50 $O $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 S0 50 $0 $0 51,000,000 $1,000,000 Right-of-Way $0 50 S0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction 50 $0 50 50 50 $10,000,000 510,000,000 Inspection&Administration 50 so S0 S0 S0 50 50 Contingency SO 50 50 $0 $0 S0 50 Total Costs: 50 50 $0 50 50 Su,000,000 $1,000,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD TOTAL Fire Capital Projects(288) 50 50 SO 50 50 511,000,000 $11,000,000 Total Costs: 50 SO 50 <0 $0 S11,000,000 51:DGQw0 Impact on Operations: Fire District operations and maintenance costs will increasae with increased square footage,but will be unknown until final design is complete. J 11 Project Number: JL Key: 1733 Object: Fire District -San Bernardino Station (172) Relocation Project Location: I I • "' e ( ) L " I + I) 9612 San Bernardino Road -- IS PROJECT L OCATfO It—S,a Est.Construction Start/End: Iz ;;,-- To be determined �, I€ I ' � ' : _---- I 1 .. e elthItNTAI Project Status: — j ( 1 �. ) Purchase of a proposed site in - ----'----y I ~,2% ,uw�,. ... 6 progress ) Department: Fire Protection District i T_ ,,,t i 3 3 As. Project Manager: FOOTHILL BLVD Chief Mike Bell/Pamela Pane I I lei ia 1 I Description: New Fire Station construction at a new location. New property for this station has been identified and negotiation in progress. Justification: Rebuilding and possibly relocating this 55-year old Fire Station was recommended in the Fire District's 2005 Strategic Plan. This station serves the southwestern portion of the Rancho Cucamonga community,providing the area with emergency services for fire suppression and life safety. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES S0 50 SO 50 50 50 50 Design/Plan Review 50 $0 SO $0 $0 5500,000 $500,000 Right-of-Way SO 50 So SO SO 50 $0 Construction $0 $0 SO $O $O $5,000,000 $6,000,000 Inspection&Administration $o So SO so 50 $0 50 Contingency 50 S0 S0 $0 SO 50 So Total Costs: $0 50 $0 $0 50 56,500,000 56,500,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD TOTAL Fire Capital Projects(288) 50 50 S0 50 $0 $6,500,000 $8500,000 Total Costs: 50 50 50 50 50 56,500,000 56,500,000 Impact on Operations: No additional personnel costs - current San Bernardino Station personnel will move to the new station when complete. Larger station design could create an increase in maintenance costs,but greater efficiency in station equipment could make it a wash. J 12 Project Number: IL Key: 1189 Object: Foothill Boulevard from Grove Avenue to San Bernardino Road-Widening with Median Island including Landscaped Median to Vineyard Avenue •Project location: t {(1 VIA-NGERTU �� -� — —sJU♦_ Foothill Boulevard from Grove r SILL COUNTRY CL�UBIt,11 II 1 1 �� �f /��m ai �CA'dINU s�TRI 1—J I �, ^ 'n Avenue to San Bernardino Road, I II/ including landscaped median to \(IL 1 5< ((( J �i r .� a�•Vineyard Avenue .‘!J 5: ��` �/ ^;�- ¢? I. +' u �i^` a �,��RG FAMILY SPgRTS CENTER CL,;;4IC Est.Construction Start/End: qL I To be determined - 1 I IL fir � I - T.:.,lCER Project Status: sAN:uL,t:A,Rn o ./ � I II QYN� CO Design / /V.OP y li i e . 1 Department: r,;,,,,,-, ,„,0)- PxP sP -ti Dv z Engineering_ '�/� / a °J ( < SE/AR GULCH �.lrC's' • x EL€NIENTARYI Er 1 ff ` CPR � I i c b II r( Project Manager: 6—PROJECT LOCATION "i—ILr' I BEAR ib cy PEA®K: Curt Billings Ft— (�'c"—I� rp I I RROWW TP I f G Description: This project is the last phase of the multi phased Foothill Boulevard street and bridge improvements and includes right-of-way acquisition,utility relocation,street widening,storm drain and landscape improvements,including arches at both the west and east City limits. Justification: This project will provide increased traffic and pedestrian circulation including safety and visual enhancements. The project is identified in the City's General Plan,the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and has been marked as a City Council goal. Project Cost Estimate(5): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 Design/Plan Review $3,096,000 50 $0 $0 $0 530,000 $3,126,000 Right-of-Way $713,000 $0 $0 $0 SO $141,000 $854,000 Construction $9,884,000 50 $0 $0 $0 $4,059,000 513,943,000 Inspection&Administration 5613,000 50 50 50 $0 $0 $613,000 Contingency 51,289,000 50 50 $0 $0 $400,000 51,589,000 Total Costs: 515,595,000 50 s0 S0 SO $4,630,000 $20,225,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL RDA-2001 TAB(650) 53,504,000 50 $0 $0 50 $0 $3,504,000 RDA-2004 TAO(EiO) $71684,000 So Si„ 50 . S0 SO $11,684,000 Transportation Fund(124) 5407,000 50 50 50 $0 SD 5407,000 Unknown 50 50 SO 50 $0 $4,630,000 $4,630,000 Total Costs: 515,595,000 $0 $0 S0 $0 $4,630,000 $20,225,000 Impact on Operations: This project adds one mile of additional landscape maintenance costs along Foothill Boulevard,as well as some additional street lights into SLD 1. J 13 Project Number: 800-2013-15 11 Key: 1829 Object: • Haven Avenue from Wilson Avenue to Vivienda Street-Community Trail on the west side Project location: 51 `--e 0 �- II �( 11 j( ,� ��/��_ O. West side of Haven Avenue From ® n Vl TATOROVE=ST _W ) G �Cnert Wilson Avenue to Vivienda Street I( s PROJECT LOCATION % I N ?—V:VIENDA.ST cll. �JA'C ARAND-A-G4 .9 if —I WI( 4, l mILLSIIDE:RD I��' -p' t < �_ Est.Construction Start/End: 1 J r -.4 n .� rz ~- To be determined �`t I( i fIlONACO=PL r C Z 111{` f II 1 .0 u: C 'd✓A:.•E!t FJRJCL"N CAPRI wt.) IL . ~BEE } C=A PF LE-t-N=Q Project Status: I I L 1 I' I- 1'(JPL'AR AT:J 1 Z r.'' st r 1l Design �—= r51, n I } m l a HERMOSAf J-�_ I Department: �I a w i IEf✓IL ENTARJ V L Engineering Q m ( NCU-TMRI DC EDI.+ �"�, Tr )..up- GANy=CTi > �f SA!'1OL'EI-lI-(=T.f-R��' �.' w Project Manager: MANZANt1FA-.CF2�z--d�J Ir----r--LAVENDE3-CTQ CHAFFEY Romeo David yl 1IIKERNWnnrtd=CJ"�T1 (r—ir—i) it COLLEGE Description: Construction of an equestrian trail on the west side of Haven Avenue. Project includes the installation of a two rail PVC fence, decomposed granite,and mow curbs. Justification: This project will connect to the existing community trail at the west side of Haven Avenue and is part of the trail master plan.It will also improve the appearance of the west side of Haven Avenue. Project Cost Estimate(S): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 50 $0 So $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $2,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,500 Right-of-Way so 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 So $0 $0 $0 $112,000 $112,000 Inspection&Administration 50 So 50 S0 So $2,000 $2,000 Contingency 50 S0 50 50 50 $11,000 $11,000 Total Costs: 52,500 50 50 50 50 $125,000 $127,500 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD TOTAL Beautification Fund(110) $2,50o So $0 SO $0 $0 $2,500 Unknown $0 $0 $0 50 50 $125,000 $125,000 Total Costs; $2,50U pu $0 . $0 50 $125,000 $127,500 Impact on Operations: This project will add an additional quarter mile to the City's trail inventory, requiring trash removal, weed abatement,and routine maintenance. .1 14 Project Number: 800-2012-28 ' it Key: 1810 Object: Hermosa Avenue from the Alta Loma Basin to Wilson Avenue-Storm Drain Improvements Project Location: — —/ r t t s Loma Basin to Wilson Avenue 0 t �� 1L, I .Aenmosn zl =�4-�, WJ ELFrdENTG P.Y ) r� H" fit. c # %` ,:.Lit_, ii • L - 1111/1 nuK,u�,1.rer.-_euTe lNn°n�iCnn � r A,NZ40.1n1,---1 -� • L µ U'6.`U^ \\.�JvFNN NT.`J\ CHRF FEY 1 - nntr--- COLLEGE Est.Construction Start/End: I �� , CL--.'�Hl \ uArvuRes ca 4/2016 I` Ir. ^ i�?Fi G++twow Lr� ) 14 ,� I; ( —' L J (f 1 AtR ' :J Project Status: ? i �t Design )mim ALTA LOMA BASIN r"j ALTA LOMA BASIN —e aAnsr - Department: Ir _� L���,. -�H k( -, I ..i �_ Engineeringkrs JJJ i..- _ PROJEC I LOCATION_ a Project Manager: .=1 3- I I J i I 1^i� s-1 - _3 Curt Billings _ r_JLfl.,uNAU �� -g�. 1—; �' �� —, Description: Construct a master planned storm drain, install mainline, catch basins and manholes. The entire street from the Alta Basin to Wilson Avenue will be resurfaced upon completion(see Hermosa rehabilitation project 11.1815). Justification: This project will improve drainage and extend pavement life,use,and rideability.Also,during rain events it will provide improved pedestrian access to the Hermosa Intermediate School at Wilson Avenue and Hermosa Avenue. Project Cost Estimate($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 - 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 50 SO 50 50 50 50 Design/Plan Review $10,000 50 $0 So 50 S0 $10,000 Right-of-Way 50 50 50 50 50 50 $0 Construction 50 50 51,900,000 50 50 SO 51,900,000 Inspection&Administration 50 $0 $45,000 So SO $0 $45,000 Contingency SO SO $300,000 50 50 50 $300,000 Total Costs: . 510,000 SO $2,245,000 50 50 50 52,255,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Drainage General Fund(112) 510,000 50 $0 50 So 50 510,000 Unknown 50 50 $2,245,000 50 $0 $0 52,245,000 Total Costs: 510,0tju 50 $2,245,003 GO "- '>U SO 52,255,000 Impact on Operations: Elimination of storm water protection costs for placing sand bags and cleanup, and a reduction of street repair maintenace costs for pothole and crack repairs,thus freeing up maintenance crews for other areas. J 15 Project Number: 800-2011-08 JL Key: 1791 Object: Lemon Avenue from Haven Avenue to 1,300 feet west-Storm Drain Improvements Project Location: 41) �� j I ui I F: Lemon Avenue from Haven i �((` n > w a 3. 'z 4 Avenue to 1300 feet west. I r a y a -J it w I > 3 I LL w \ Q tC-.>---•J. J° cc —r te' w 1___ -____.j IAU EST'jI�. a 1Q, G thcistm•E_Yi l( Est.Construction Start/End: J j I`I-� �r—I I w ca 4/2018-9/2018 .4TJ5�rRt,1` �:IS.wcts,YT_ 1 z PROJECT LOCATION / > Project Status: (> Cam. I I /.OPT, Q < VINEYARD sOriEE li 5L/Urt . _ Design u+ O- o to JUNIOR HIGH V- P Department: •`_ - �¢�_u., - HIGHLA710.AV7- Jam--^ . ; 1=2' Engineering - -- --r 1+"�' r INCH AVE \x' la''• Project Manager: _ -, 4 Itu'HA\! F.-_ Curt Billings ' - R '9 ° r' m ( I Description: Construct a master planned storm drain,install mainline,catch basins and manholes.The entire street from Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue will be resurfaced upon completion(see Lemon rehabilitation project JL 1793(. Justification: This project will improve drainage and extend pavement life,use,and rideability.Also,during rain events it will provide improved pedestrian access. Project Cost Estimate(5): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2015/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Design/Plan Review 52,000 SO So 50 $0 50 52,000 Right-of-Way $0 SO 50 50 50 50 50 Construction 50 S0 50 50 51,520,000 $0 $1,520,000 Inspection&Administration 5o 50 50 50 510,000 50 510,000 Contingency so SO So 50 5170,000 50 5170,000 Total Costs: 52,000 50 50 50 $1,700,000 50 51,702,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Drainage General Fund(112) 52,000 $0 50 50 50 50 $2,000 Unknown 50 S0 50 50 $1,700,000 $0 51,700,000 Total Costs • o,00n 50 50 ,,, - 51,70C,06d SO s1,iue,uuu- Impact on Operations: Elimination of storm water protection costs for placing sand bags and cleanup, and a reduction of street repair maintenace costs for pothole and crack repairs,thus freeing up maintenance crews for other areas. J 16 Project Number: 800-2014-11 JL Key: 1888 Object: Miller Avenue at East Avenue -Traffic Signal Installation Project Location: / /,,,, "�j! L' •OUNTaIN Dit /�i 1 J I 11 9 Miller Avenue at East Avenue /��/ ('�— a 11 a RIVER-OAK-DR--- j TLVLR"tts i ��/I a_ r- i / //� :% a I:RI-SIGNE DR¢ in i°'� 1 r'-WIaYI PROJECT/La CATION J I \ 1 1 ���!� lilt VAI-I-EV-DR— 1 "`ill 4LltIRA OR Est.Construction Start/End: /-Rt, l.1JLLFg,nVF_-r�_ ■ ,� To be determined ', ��i LANDP\' r:T2 C---^V:. / .< 4/' a ,� PERDEW• / - rc ELEMENTARY e.. - •' Project Status: j j = s 1 )) Design /,i/ � VlCOI4IP.T.O.9R i lW /`��j �„_�r:LAhhT!:.T_�x �j-=��� CUIt IF.Z.^.i I IF Department: / % y a� I4 i z i a Engineering (✓'-1 U t ,�, '_` I—�P�sc,NG i W s v—�iLL i -CO-1E NV:1.STrARCIa.nR a��� • I Project Manager: GARGIA PARK Jason Welday j / Description: The scope of work to be performed in general consists of,but is not limited to,installation of traffic signals and related equipment at Miller Avenue and East Avenue. Justification: The installation of traffic signals will improve traffic safety and reduce traffic congestion. Project Cost Estimate IS): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TEJO TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 50 So $0 So $0 50 Design/Plan Review $0 50 So $0 $0 $12500 $12,500 Right-of-Way $0 $0 SO SO $0 $0 50 Construction $0 SO $0 SO $0 $250,000 $250,000 Inspection&Administration $O $0 S0 So SO $12,500 $12,500 Contingency $0 $0 SO 50 SO $25,000 525,000 Total Costs: $0 $D SO 50 50 $300,000 $300,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 TOTAL Transportation(124) 5D $0 50 5o So $300,000 $300,000 Total Costs: So $o SO So .So $300,000 $300,000 Impact on Operations: The City will be responsible to pay for the cost of electricity and maintenance.The estimated cost of electricity and • maintenance for a traffic signal is$2,500 per year. J 17 Job Number: • 1L Key: 1775 Object: Pacific Electric Trail Enhancements -West to East City Limits Project Location: I .. i I i Pacific Electric Trail from West _ „ i City Limits to East City limits I • ...rrw111(n ire Q. 1 . I Est.Construction Start/End: 'i To be determined -` apimirmainsore ir Project Status: ` Design iii‘is a .- T. I f- J in. r) �_ Department: / P - OJEC s vTION Engineering al i I I / l Project Manager: / _J \ I Walt Stickney • s—e_�� I ' — Description: This project includes the addition of various amenities along the trail. These amenities consist of replacing plaques and Installing other trail improvements such as truncated domes at wheel chair ramps. Justification: The trail from the west to east end was constructed in different phases,at different times,and by different contractors. Issues have come up during the course of the last couple years by users of the trail that has prompted the need for this enhancement. Project Cost Estimate(5): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015(16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES SO 5o SO $0 So 50 S0 Design/Plan Review SO 50 50 50 SO 50 $0 Right-of-Way $0 50 50 50 50 j0 SO Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $110000 5110.000 Inspection&Administration S0 $0 $0 50 So so 50 Contingency $0 SO $0 50 $0 $0 SO Total Costs: $0 $0 50 50 50 $110,000 $110,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD TOTAL Beautification(110) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 510,000 510,000 Citywide Infrastructure Imp(198) 50 5o so 50 50 $100,000 $100.000 Total Costs: So SO $0 SO So 5110,000 5110.000 Impact on Operations: Minimal imoact on operations. J 18 Project Number: 1L Key: 1621 Object: Red Hill Park-Pedestrian Paseo Project Location: _—_ ------_--__ 7484 Vineyard Avenue I _ ---- -- ---� — :=:‘,. z e 11J W " m © —"-1. c a - ,pr Est.Construction Start/End: 9 . _e ,.: = To he determined RED CI _ I - HILL 2 2 v° -�. I �.. *_ ^Q.i CH1JftCt COUNTRY ` �xt Q'4 I; - C: i __ Project Status: CLUB `- Design . PROJECT LOCATION ,----Y Department: _ Q Q =— PT" --.FOOTHILL--=-:BL-VD-- Engineering p -- "" - re Z :_ a Project Manager: I W '_._ -. z- ' Z ai Walt Stickney Lii. `''''"Ili 5 ,- Z_. .-_,-.. --„. .... Description: Construction of a concrete sidewalk and lights in the south west corner between Red Hill Park and Carnelian Avenue. Justification: Adds a pedestrian access to Red Hill Park from Carnelian Avenue Project Cost Estimate(5): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES So 50 50 so So SO SO Design/Plan Review $15,000 $0 50 $0 $0 SO 515,000 Right-of-Way So SO 50 $0 So SO 50 Construction SO S0 SD $0 $0 $90,000 590,000 Inspection&Administration So So 50 SO So 50 50 Contingency SO 5o 50 50 50 $10,000 510,000 Total Costs: $15,000 $0 50 $0 50 5100,000 5115,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD TOTAL PC-85 Redemption(848) 515,000 50 So $0 So $100,000 $115,000 Total Costs: $15,000 So so SD $0 $100000 5115,000 Impact on Operations: 'Minor impact. J 19 Project Number: 800-2013-28 11.Key: 1842 Object: Safety Lighting- Upgrades at Various Intersections Project Location: ' _ ��I :—,J ./.i - I Sr n ♦ d, uuI g_ �d r-•"-..q Foothill Boulevard at the _�^ t e H St I �nI � P intersections of Vineyard Avenue, PARI( ' i _ gi� IVI IWL l "`���� I / .%i., 5i _ �1 `i I 11; I �r9,eo.nxx�7,,:, . Archibald Avenue, and Haven J® IL r%=`.n Ii I -AI nY��"� . Dorn men Po_ Avenue ---/ c mou �� oir 3` � � emQ"r�T �' ( Immocelll ---/1 li {/ 5J f 7 • _ �" _MUFC STRE TPAIk eL, Ic �/: iS MuLs_a I' 'ii HIR'f_ Lrr. c}L �J1 ) ed i1u�AN� �I �LJ"4£11 I I�I� IQ., rif _ e �`. F:.177 ;- �I� to K�I' T ,Si W 1 `.L r ;l_. Est.Construction Start/End: \,, a ( GE. s„,�- IIJL-' c . L`CJ1.",re To be determined �1 A S J �r nc: , Q" R }q�g E 1 . - i it EIRT<STA HON��-� ,- t,i m""'° "'"`"'°" "" �L PROJECT LOCATION;-=� 1 Project Status: .., Design Cr-- --I�tsc. i[ y.. _t ., � 1 1)111 3I 1I [ II ,. ! O ! LE Department: is i -_ i �� I__ I. - c _ $ cTr C E P.c NIct srp �CCmiC2Q"S n Engineering ecl RC it a :I' s_' � ; I --n. LI s,: [ll` a 11RY I N 111 1i q i - ! ,: .ro � 5C Na . " Af.W-�-4l 11 r t�G E5OUF Project Manager: °__�I i� ij<.ac. ,.... ¢—�-1 'F—+ P,mi��be,w"x.ce"aQR: �,_ Jason Welday 1I I�(c �� RH`rr n`1 II— .'— �II � If � �aax�'",4Dre Description: The scope of work to be performed in general consists of, but is not limited to, installing additional safety lighting at existing signalized intersections. Justification: The project will improve safety for vehicles and pedestrians by enhancing the visibility at the intersection. Project Cost Estimate($j: Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TOD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 $0 S0 so $0 S0 $0 Design/Plan Review 50 50 50 50 50 53,000 53,000 Right-of-Way $0 $0 SO So $o $o So Construction 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 5130,000 5130,000 Inspection&Administration $0 So SO So $0 $4,000 $4,000 Contingency 50 S0 $o SO $0 $13,000 $13,000 Total Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $150,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior years 2014(15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TOD TOTAL Transportation(124) So So $0 $0 $0 5150,000 $150,000 Total Costs: - So SO $0 $0 $0 $150,000 5150,000 Impact on Operations: The project will increase the cost for electrical service,and maintenance to replace lamps will occur approximately every 5 years. J 20 Project Number: AL Key: Object: Upper Cucamonga Storm Drain Phase III - East of Hellman Avenue to Base Line Road to Roberds, North on Amethyst Street to 19th Street, and Easterly 300 feet - Project Location: 1.190 - j:F_IRE-S-TATIS>N East of Hellman Avenue along the I "��� 'GARUF.N:ST—r_, 7 a 1 t north side of the Pacific Electric I' PROJECT LOCATION-1r "s Trail, along Base Line Road to _ : '' 11 Jr I r^-�^-+ Y I n )1 IJ A T)1$.7 c a Roberds Street,north in Amethyst 'z-5. ='-1- 1r PAL-A>II j A{.e:AVi. Street to 19th Street and easterly I� •_ II I� �� <r•�L° 300 feet. �caN-s.T=W _, li croN:e.1 ,r--,11 c •°-1I JL'ocr'slj R �_; IRf�—Z �- ‘1 -I -7? C. t:GNUNE t:I$5T C��< FA Yom:- in I S"AGi `fir// a Horns-4.4 F `_-j{ULy Y-�:_ IIIIIII`Ii 1,1 -. 1 Est.Construction Start/End: `I'j `A ALON=ST'Op AVAL-ONJST a m U IL. To be determined v:C.5 I-I I I m a _VISTA ST NP IITE:V:RTA ji L4.VFIfNL:D1� *J �. ! ( t '( n� Oil MIONTELVISTA:ST� „Sr� II1�tIjCLL RLINS$T ur L mi G 1 I� Project Status: UI I'OA-f�..NE:ST— IFrlsosT A CAM 0C J 1 dAVINE sT II O Q II I.a-.WUl-43�4}--ii j��TA LOrdA I I U C Construction 'r ( C/VIRONGAtst ' '< 'AMCNTA1N II /� `- FlE61ENTA Y 'AI%:ST'.4. I U Il LA:GFANDE:SY a— F ti. EILLII ElA EN7ARY LAI•GRANr.F Sr I� ALTA LOMA l I /I f__� CCev.Tcog� '� t:OMliACT +C-1 L4'ldl.1/.pIIN7 Department; W e L MITA.oR HIGH W II / jI I C J Engineering JI ca R . t' CO �11 ���♦ i) ( I I/:I E Da'CT ((I w BA:ELIN ERL ��� cr — Project Manager. I I I ¢JI 1LILIO SPARK ))1� .' t "-'z I Romeo David I 11—•' sue. .. {� �I 1� n�J IV/�%rt •i (J rj-a rz Description: Construct a Master Plan Storm Drain,install catch basins and manholes. In addition,Amethyst Street will be widened with curb and gutter and sidewalks where necessary. All the streets within the storm drain limits will be resurfaced upon completion. Justification: This project will improve drainage and extend pavement life,use,and rideahility.Also,during rain events it will provide improved pedestrian access along Amethyst Street which serves Alta Loma Elementary School. In addition,a FEMA Flood Zone Letter of Map Revision ILOMR)will be processed after completion removing the properties around the area from Zone A requiring additional flood insurance. Project Cost Estimate(Si: Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES S0 $0 S0 S0 S0 $0 50 Design/Plan Review $0 50 $0 50 50 50 50 Right-of-Way 50 50 50 50 50 50 $o Construction SO $0 50 50 $0 $3,500,000 $3,500,000 Inspection&Administration S0 so 50 50 50 50 50 Contingency • So 50 50 50 50 5400,000 $400.000 Total Costs: 50 50 $0 $0 50 $3,900,000 53,900,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TBD TOTAL Unknown SD So 50 50 50 53,900,000 53,900,000 Total Costs: SO 50 <V $C ... 53,900,600 p3,9uQ0uu Impact on Operations: Elimination of storm water protection costs for placing sand bags and cleanup, and reduction of street repair maintenace costs for pothole and crack repairs,thus freeing up maintenance crews for other areas. J 21 .9� - ,4',0 wok • iv, General Plan Policies Fiscal Year 2014h015 Capital Improvement Program 11117:0;9„th _ 4, A . oft43t,4Etiv7tittit II ir:7714witgrArole S '• . ,- i.o,s,,A., V.,-,i11.:t.m„t .. .iiii. €,A 4'..4- -*, V1/4 -.:,:..„,„,,,464.1.: „,„ , , . ,.?e314'9, ‘ 4„.,:ctf.,,t- .311 i '..;%! c " 4 iv ''Yt, V : ti 4frea yt l .....\ 4141 / \ . .. (.7--\, i \ _ . . BEAU/4 \ ,-.„. , r4i ,' *h.,, Th.fti 1 . 1- C4' , , t ../ks.. , . it m. ,„,/ ,,16e . , ION -, ,,• , , ,,..,r ,...,,,..,,,oes ,-. ; # cE .,---„, VS: ‘-',''. --SIV- '* 2--e ')4 t # i Ar* , "x• r ' j44..'-,,,.. . , f.....4,..;,,,V. 1\ ,"' •'2'..S4. '''' 4,t tO ityit ' liod‘f. II r '1 2. 14_ ,„. . , ' :, .:a, L., . 1 ...... -... . / ) 7) \ Iit....; ---, . r 4.. ' , ' i A d % ' -ff * fr. Tit , A. %, A N II\ 1... i:\ it rk 1 tabu 'k i 1- '.-- I 3- v 2.,. .. , - 14\ ,1 , ,‘„ .- Action j> iE Type a $ a General Plan Policy G o c > m a `m ce c a cuca y o Y c_ .CC T t: c o) > O O .o o a Implementation Action(s) E a o, c `o_ a a rn d co w u'- a` Implement the Bicycle Plan pursuant to Figure CM-6. Update the City's Bicycle Circulation Plan in a format suitable for obtaining public funding. Develop the planning, implementation, and design details of the bicycle facility and amenity elements of the Community Mobility Chapter, including the setting of implementation priorities and the identification of both capital and operating funding sources. Implementation should focus on adding a north-south trail along either Deer Creek or Cucamonga Creek as a first priority. Update the City's Trails Implementation Plan to maintain consistency A, D, with the General Plan. ENG PL E, F, I 4 Review City ordinances to ensure that an adequate mechanism exists to manage the use of trails only by authorized categories of users. Implementation of the Bicycle Plan may require traffic signalization at the ' crossing of bike paths with arterial roadways to facilitate the safe crossing of those arterials by bicyclists and pedestrians. Signals should be convenient to bicyclists with accessible push-buttons to activate the signal. Provide traffic control push button devices at convenient locations for bicyclists at signalized intersections on the identified Bicycle Network. CM-3.6 O O Continue to encourage the provision of bicycle facilities, such as bicycle lockers and secure bike parking,throughout the City. Identify existing locations where bicycle lockers and secure bicycle parking could be provided at key locations throughout put the City, and develop a funding and implementation plan. Encourage/require the provision of bicycle lockers and secure bike parking for major development projects, as defined in the Development PL ENG A, D, 4 Code. E, F, H Modify the Development Code to require provision of bicycle parking spaces, bicycle lockers, and, as appropriate, showers for bicycle riders at new buildings providing significant employment, at transit stations, in the commercial districts, and at recreational destinations in the City. Identify and implement a dedicated funding source for CM-3.9 0 Implementation and completion of the Bicycle Network as identified in the Bicycle Plan. Same action as identified for CM-3.7. ENG E, F 4 CM- 0 Continue to complete the installation of sidewalks and require new 3.10 development to provide sidewalks. Use the CIP to identify a schedule for installing new and replacement sidewalks throughout the City, placing priority on installing missing B,C, sidewalks near schools and activity centers, and replacing sidewalks that ENG D q have been identified as hazardous to public safety. Appendix A:Implementation Plan A-24 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Action r Title a u ; o General Plan Policy 0 c a r d 5 N a y N _ `v C •a v ma o e U N A c C A 0 0 0. Implementation Action(s) c m 'o a a cn a u a ` rn M '-` CM- Continue to provide pedestrian amenities on sidewalks on major 311 0 streets that are key pedestrian routes, including the provision of benches,shade trees,and trash cans. Identify key pedestrian travel corridors citywide, and prepare a Citywide Pedestrian Circulation Study to determine pedestrian amenity needs, capital and operating funding sources, and a phased implementation program. Develop a program for gradually installing public amenities A B such as streetlights, benches, trash containers, art, drinking fountains, ENG PL C D 5 landscaping, etc. that will enhance the pedestrian environment and encourage increased use of transit. Use both the CIP process and other funding sources, including a program whereby businesses or residents may sponsor street furniture and/or landscaped areas. CM- Continue to require that the siting and architectural design of new 112 0 development 'promote safety, pedestrian-friendly design, and ' access to transit facilities. Develop standards to be applied to development projects along transit FL ENG I 4 corridors that require transit and pedestrian accessibility. Establish a number of bike hubs in the City (centralized locations CM- 0 with convenient bike parking for trip destinations or transfer to 3.13 other transportation modes), at key transit nodes, and at commercial nodes. Conduct a study to determine the best locations for bike hubs in the City, and develop a plan, wayfinding program, and implementation process for ENG PL, RD A, B. 4 providing bike hubs that provide secure bicycle lockers, bike racks, and C, D connections to transit at key locations in the City. CM- 0 Enhance pedestrian and bicycle access to local and regional 3.14 transit,including facilitating connections to transit. Same action as identified for CM-3.7. ENG PL I 4 CM- Coordinate the provision of the non-motorized networks (bicycle 3.15 0 and pedestrian) with adjacent jurisdictions to maximize sub- regional connectivity. Same action as identified for CM-3.7. ENG PL A, E, F 4 CM- 0 Establish fixed-route local circulator bus service connecting major 3.16 activity centers. Explore development of a fixed-route local circulator bus system, station ENG PL A, E, H 5 location,and funding mechanisms. Continue to implement traffic management and traffic signal CM-4.1 0 operations measures along the arterial roadway to minimize delay and congestion for all modes, without adversely impacting transit, bicycles,and pedestrians. Appendix.4:Implementation Plan A' RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN A-25 Action r Type 3 • 3 o General Plan Policy c Y c m a T ` ,I- '5 c a a C c a N t > y m T u N 0O CO ❑ 0 o n Implementation Action(s) E a Val c `o_•a a CO a` to ce ri a` PL,AS, A B Same actions as identified for RC-4.1 to RC-4.5. ENG ENG, C, E, 3 CM, BS, G. I PW, FIN Encourage development of transit-oriented and infill development, PS-12.3 0 and encourage a mix of uses that foster walking and alternative transportation. Same action as identified for RC-4.4. PL ENG A, I 3 Provide enhanced bicycling and walking infrastructure,and support PS-12.4 0 public transit, including public bus service, the Metrolink, and the potential for Bus Rapid Transit(BRT). �_. . _ _ _ - ---- —---- Same action as identified for RC-4.4. PL ENG A, I 3 Provide green building incentives, assess green building techniques as a formal stage of project review,and develop a green PS-12.5 0 building ordinance or program that addresses both new and existing buildings.Adaptation strategies will also Include increased water efficiency in buildings. Same actions as identified for RC-6.1 to RC-6.4 PL ENG A, I,K 4 Encourage efforts to reduce waste generation and re-use and PS-12.6 0 support Increased recycling and composting opportunities with a focus on large commercial and industrial waste producers. Same action as identified for PF-7.1. ENG PL A 3 PS-12.7 O O Support tree planting, planting more vegetation (including native and drought-resistant planting),and preservation of open space. Same actions as identified for RC-1.1, RC-8.1 to RC-8.7. PL FW A, I 4 PS-12.8 O Develop green procurement plans and ensure energy savings in City operations and maintenance. Same actions as identified for RC-5.1 to RC-5.3. AS CM, FIN, A,B, C, 4 PW E, K Develop energy- or climate change-themed publications and workshops,facilitating energy audits for residents,and establishing PS-12.9 O partnerships to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Increase public awareness about climate change, and encourage residents and businesses to become Involved in activities and lifestyle changes that help reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Same action as identified for RC-5.1. CM ENG A,K 4 Consider the compatibility of proposed land uses with the noise environment when preparing or revising community and/or specific PS-13.1 0 plans and when reviewing development proposals. The contour map depicting future noise levels(Figure PS-10)should be used by the City as a guide to land use/noise compatibility. Appendix A:Implementation Plan A-57 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN r � x k { ..„4„� fir. K f ,�_,2 F . a `f' i k" ' ' \'' il4ikkiW5'. '-r' tlek.4 '. ' 1 It Di __44 f:. J. ( x t P. p-gxM1 ,na 4,. \,,.r 1 i k -' , g f1 ;Y: 4( 1.t'ZI, 4k it'‘'' i ter ` . /� ......__ - ' \. � fl �� <72 l f a '' .CNN� .- A • Action r Type a 0 L General Plan Policy 0 al c d > o u v 'R a 3? 6. d N v u rna o K — > c — rn _ r V T U N n c oo c u c .o o. Implementation Action(s) E n wa `o_ a a to o_ co ce ri a` Explore the Feasibility of Extending Local Transit Service Explore the possibility of extending to adjacent jurisdictions in cooperation with such jurisdictions who could also participate in funding, if beneficial to the City. • Work with Regional Transit Operators(Omnitrans) Develop the optimum coordination and integration of bus transit services between the local City circulator system and the regional service. Consult with Omnitrans to establish and maintain transit hubs at CM-3.4 O Victoria Gardens, Chaffey College, the Metrolink Station, and other locations as appropriate to facilitate use of transit and transfers . between transit services. Same action as identified for CM-3.1: ENG PL A 4 ' Consider and evaluate the possible relocation of the Metrolink CM-3.5 O Station to Haven Avenue to provide improved connections to transit and to support planned transit-oriented land uses along Haven Avenue. Work with Metrolink and Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) to study the feasibility of moving the Metrolink Station from its ENG, current location to Haven Avenue. Explore options for alternative funding PL RD E, F 6 from sources other than the General Fund, such as grants, and specifically grants that promote transit-oriented development. In addition to requiring private development to provide transit amenities, consult with regional transit operators to provide CM-3.6 0 attractive and convenient bus stops, including shade/weather protection, seats, transit information, and bus shelters as appropriate. Same action as identified for CM-3.1. Also, develop a program, with identified funding sources, for providing amenities at bus stops in the ENG PL D 4 City. Continue to develop and maintain a citywide bicycle network of off- street bike paths, on-street bike lanes, and bike streets to provide CM-3.7 0 0 connections between neighborhoods, schools, parks, civic center/facilities, recreational facilities, and major commercial centers. Appendix A:Implementation Plan RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN A-23 Action Type O• 3 General Plan Policy o T ` • w o .2 y 0 r c cc c a co — u �? m `o o E D '3 rr .5 Implementation Action(s) E a m c o o ° a r o — a a w C. N ce u_ a` Implement the Bicycle Plan pursuant to Figure CM-6. Update the City's Bicycle Circulation Plan in a format suitable for obtaining public funding. Develop the planning, implementation, and design details of the bicycle facility and amenity elements of the Community Mobility Chapter, including the setting of implementation priorities and the identification of both capital and operating funding sources. Implementation should focus on adding a north-south trail along either Deer Creek or Cucamonga Creek as a first priority. Update the City's Trails Implementation Plan to maintain consistency A D with the General Plan. ENG PL E, F, 1 4 Review City ordinances to ensure that an adequate mechanism exists to manage the use of trails only by authorized categories of users. Implementation of the Bicycle Plan may require traffic signalization at the crossing of bike paths with arterial roadways to facilitate the safe crossing of those arterials by bicyclists and pedestrians. Signals should be convenient to bicyclists with accessible push-buttons to activate the signal. Provide traffic control push button devices at convenient locations for bicyclists at signalized intersections on the identified Bicycle Network. CM-3.8 O O Continue to encourage the provision of bicycle facilities, such as bicycle lockers and secure bike parking,throughout the City. Identify existing locations where bicycle lockers and secure bicycle parking could be provided at key locations throughout put the City, and develop a funding and implementation plan. Encourage/require the provision of bicycle lockers and secure bike parking for major development projects, as defined in the Development PL ENG A, D, 4 Code. E, F, H Modify the Development Code to require provision of bicycle parking spaces, bicycle lockers, and,as appropriate, showers for bicycle riders at new buildings providing significant employment, at transit stations, in the commercial districts, and at recreational destinations in the City. Identify and implement a dedicated funding source for CM-3.9 0 implementation and completion of the Bicycle Network as identified in the Bicycle Plan. Same action as identified for CM-3.7. ENG E, F 4 CM- 0 Continue to complete the installation of sidewalks and require new • 3.10 development to provide sidewalks. Use the CIP to identify a schedule for installing new and replacement sidewalks throughout the City, placing priority on installing missing B, C, sidewalks near schools and activity centers, and replacing sidewalks that ENG D 4 have been identified as hazardous to public safety. Appendix A:Implementation Plan A-24 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Action ' Type an a General Plan Policy 0 ow 3 >_ a `o a '� Vt d 7 w rn= o Y - to c a y >. U a A o o E 2 .o o .Q Implementation Action(s) E a w c o ' a ` a a d Co a n � di:-` Complete intersection capacity improvements, coordinate traffic signals utilizing Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), and improve striping and signage. Striping shall maximize room for bike lanes where feasible and consistent with the Bicycle Plan. Modernize traffic signal equipment as necessary, and continue to update traffic signal timing and ENG PW A, D 3 synchronization plans to optimize traffic flow along the key arterial corridors, taking into account the needs of transit, bicyclists, and pedestrians as well. Invest in the communications infrastructure necessary to operate a Citywide traffic signal control system. Continue to design and operate arterials and intersections for the • CM-4.2 0 safe operation of all modes, including transit, bicyclists, and pedestrians. Same action as identified for CM-4.1. . ENG A, D 3 CM-4.3 O Continue to implement Intelligent Transportation System Measures and advanced traffic management technologies where appropriate. Same action as identified for CM-4.1. ENG PW E' F' 3 Maintain the City's transportation infrastructure in good condition; CM-4.4 0 0 develop and maintain adequate funding sources for it's ongoing maintenance and upkeep. Continue to implement and follow the schedule for resurfacing streets A, D, and streets improvements per the CIP. ENG E F 4 Continue to require that new development participates in the cost of CM-5.1 0 transportation mitigation and improvements necessitated by new development, including non-automobile solutions. Require payment of Traffic Impact Fees as approved by the City Council, used to finance specific improvements made necessary by new development. The relationship between the fees, the cost of the ENG PL D 4 improvements, and new development has been established in fee analyses approved by the City Council. These fees shall be reviewed from time to time and adjusted as needed. Require evaluation of potential traffic and transportation impacts CM-5.2 O associated with new development prior to project approval, and require adequate mitigation measures, including non-automobile solutions,prior to,or concurrent with,project development. Require 'applicants to prepare traffic and transportation impact assessments consistent with adopted City guidelines and standards. . Continue to require sidewalks, pedestrian paths, and connections to be ENG D 4 provided as part of new development projects to improve and enhance access between neighborhoods, and from neighborhoods to schools, parks,trails,commercial centers, and other activity centers. Appendix A:Implementation Plan A-26 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN � J i :, 3r • V-T f 4t-,!... . ICJ.; pm `8 0� 4 om to j K■ s a", ` 4. _ F2WIJ!ATWS .. ;: � ,„ , a ... .ol' Yb f " „ 4 V '4.1•44"--$ `�r 1/4; y/ Nyr.d t� .. ,i. Iv,f t4:1 "k a. , .r C fro - ti 1 7,; WNC HO • Action D _ Type a 0 m General Plan Policy w c 3 c y O T U O a _ O m .E m m•y 0 C • Co cc V A >, 'C c a T r O O o .o .Q Implementation Action(s) E a c c o_ a a in a` co cc U. a` Expand recreation and cultural attractions to enhance ED-2.3 0 tourism/visitor potential and to boost sales and transient occupancy tax. Develop brochures or links from the City's web site to showcase the various recreational and cultural venues to attract visitors to the City. Enhancement of cultural amenities, including regional entertainment RD CS A 7 options, recreation, and historic preservation, will help to embellish the City's reputation as a destination for a wide range of visitors. Expand lodging choices in the City through the recruitment and ED-2.4 0 placement of full-service hotels that will complement the existing select-service hotel portfolio. Review and, update marketing strategies (land surveys, infrastructure availability, and modes of transportation) to solicit the development of a RD PL A, G 4 full-service lodging facility. Make sure that zoning regulations can accommodate a full-service hotel at desired locations. ED-3.1 0 0 Continue to make public safety a priority. Use the annual budgeting process to allocate funding for public safety services, equipment, and facilities commensurate with the City's service CM PD, FD A 6 objectives. . ED-3.2 0 Provide community and cultural amenities. Same action as identified for ED-2.3. CS CM, RD A 4 ED-3.3 0 Maintain a healthy fiscal balance. Use the annual budgeting process to check that revenues from all CM AS, FIN A, G 1 sources continue to more than match projected spending. ED-3.4 O O Improve internal circulation for all modes of transportation, consistent with the concept of"Complete Streets". Same action as identified for LU-3.1 to 3.8. ENG PL K'G' 4 ED-3.5 O Facilitate development of additional local and regional entertainment venues. Focus a special economic development team on the task of working towards attracting developers and investors interested in responding to RD PL A, G 6 local and regional demand for new entertainment options. ED-3.6 O Leverage the City's quality of life amenities to attract more knowledge-based workers. Expand the Economic Development Strategy to market Rancho Cucamonga's civic assets, including parks, recreation and community RD PL,CS A,G 4 enrichment facilities and programs,trails,and quality school districts. Appendix A:Implementation Plan A-30 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Action Type a u v General Plan Policy � w 3 .- o `,c U m U 0. o a..c• v ma o IX >. D N U O O T N '_' o d Implementation Action(s) E a O c o_ ao a m a` rn re u. a` RC-8.7 O O Support protection of natural habitat areas for ecological, educational,and other scientific study purposes. Same action as identified for RC-8.3. PL ENG A, I 4 PF-1.1 O Continue to implement high-quality standards for new public facilities and improvements to existing buildings. Design and build all City buildings to serve as a model for quality architectural treatment and green building design in all new and PL ENG A, B, C 5 remodeled civic facilities. PF-12 O Promote community facilities as focal points for gatherings,events, and celebrations. Maintain all public facilities and buildings to address the needs of the various neighborhoods within the City. Advertise the availability of civic PW CS, LIB A, B, C 3 facilities to community groups. PF-1.3 O Locate new community facilities in neighborhoods and centers where they will serve populations with the greatest needs. Review and assess the needs for the location of community facilities as CS ENG, PL A 6 neighborhoods evolve. PF-1.4 O O Maintain public facilities and optimize their usefulness during their lifespan. Continue with proper maintenance programming and funding levels for CS, LIB, existing public facilities. PW AC A,B, C 4 PF-1.5 O O Continue to incorporate low-maintenance features into public facilities consistent with the City's sustainability plan. Replace features of public facilities with lower maintenance types as part PL,CS, of the on-going maintenance program. PW BS A, B,C 3 PF-1.6 O Maintain multi-functional, flexible, and complementary space at community facilities. Same action as identified for PF-1.2. CS PW A,B, C 3 Maximize public facility use by sharing with nonprofit organizations, school districts,and community organizations. Look PF-1.7 0 for opportunities to create joint-use community space at facilities owned by private organizations such as faith-based groups and service clubs. Same action as identified for CS-2.5. CS A 4 Consult with local school districts to enhance the development of PF-2.1 O O joint-use agreements, allowing for optimum use of school facilities, to provide broad community benefits such as public safety and education. Continue and expand joint use of facilities to achieve even greater CS SD A, K 5 optimization of school facilities to service the entire community. Appendix A:implementation Plan A-44 RANCHO CUCAh1ONGA GENERAL PLAN _.4----. • - 1 '" s 41%4s,,,• -.. bi,. ttic , isil•'''' •;- sate ;•••••^‘,;12,t' ' Ifht (;:' ' •••••..),.? stitt lb:,. VA ' —.04 '. tOr '13/41,1•Vst. '' 4 4,- ‘••;.:'!"•% 11/417 0••:'44•:!,, tic ii'•" ''54.1." •a Ate iiihs.ii,-- . it 4. ! ::ell's 4, tOk \ '. -44,,,r ,•.„ ' , 4 ,---- -,, misc. EL sittpA ...NFL . US t k t, }-1,,,--.-'',1:x 1.-.. .`";c,''4°e•P' . t'''''.0 t--,-":-",;;; ',.,';'. •,. 7 vSl - ‘ ',' it. itsr‘' ' -711': ' ',-'11-',, sfiv. ••• l'• il .44.7-'••••'..1.1' #;C: ''' '''' •4:''' ‘ 1/2•",1'&:- •: • 0-1':','IC.- 1.' --,:i.ka;;:t14. '.1 ki,711 ■‘" CrE-L:(Lis, -; !,:.,Caett.tt.,:- `:"' -,, ..:-:„:.:. +4, -jtritsf.l';'• '.V; ...... ._. Tr :,) . ., - ci it — ‘ 1 .—: AN\ ( ii---ir if-) 1 ,..\\„ .: L \1 \• ..1 A. '.., k.,‘ ..- ( Liqr! A M ( )N GA ..., . .1 .,-At A Action T pe a a o General Plan Policy v 3 > a ca re E re — C Ot T A Oo C co m Implementation Action(s) E a ii ao a rn a to 0 Ui a` Continue to provide a safe and efficient street system in the City, to CM-1.1 O support mobility goals, all transportation modes, and the goals of Managing the Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources Chapter. • Add the intersection improvements listed below to the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) or appropriate equivalents identified and approved by the City Engineer in the future that would offset the identified impacts; implement the improvements as funding becomes available. Prepare a report on the need for the improvements and their relationship to the impacts caused by new development in Rancho Cucamonga. • Work with Caltrans and SANBAG to implement a new freeway interchange at 1-15 and Arrow Highway. • Complete Wilson Avenue between Milliken Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard. ENG A, D, I 7 • Complete Rochester Avenue between Banyan Street and Wilson Avenue. • Pursue Federal funds for a grade separation of the SPRR at Etiwanda Avenue. • Complete storm drain and widening of Hellman Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Cucamonga Creek. • Complete Wilson Avenue from East Avenue to Wardman Bullock. • Improve the Base Line Road at I-15 Freeway Interchange. • Complete Youngs Canyon from Cherry Avenue to Banyan Street. Provide an integrated network of roadways that provides for CM-1.2 0 convenient automobile, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian circulation movement around the City. Same actions as identified for CM-2.1 and CM-3.7. ENG PL A, D, I 4 Complete the circulation system by constructing new roadway CM-1.3 0 facilities and freeway interchanges pursuant to the Circulation Plan (Figure CM-2). Identify in the CIP future projects and new roadways based on available ENG PL A, D, I 4 funding. CM-1,4 O O Provide access for seniors and those with physical disabilities in all elements of the transportation system. Continue to operate the Silver Fox Express. Consult with Omnitrans regarding providing ACCESS transportation services. ENG CS A, E. 4 Require that all new future transportation facilities have appropriate and F, H, I adequate access for seniors and people with physical disabilities. Appendix A:Implementation Plan A-19 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN • Action Ty•e •v General Plan Policy d C o O U ` w 6 @.- 0 Cr d' E L O O - 0 > U T O 0 O o — 0. Implementation Action(s) E o. m a a CO 0. co cc U. a` Implement street design standards per this General Plan, except that modified standards may be applied where appropriate on CM-1.5 O arterial corridors relating to transit,bicycle facilities,sidewalks,and on-street parking to be context sensitive to adjacent land uses and districts, and to all roadway users, including transit, bicycles, and pedestrians. y Integrate into the CIP process the planning of modified standards for y Foothill Boulevard to accommodate BRT and for other arterials as ENG PL A, D, I 4 appropriate to reflect the bikeway plan and pedestrian improvements necessary to support Mixed Use districts. CM-1.6 O Pursue a railroad grade separation at Etiwanda Avenue and the BNSF Railway line. Grade separations currently exist at Haven and Milliken Avenues. Due to truck traffic associated with the southeast industrial area, the City ENG PL A, E I 4 supports creating a railroad grade separation at Etiwanda Avenue and the BNSF Railway line. CM-2.1 0 0 Facilitate bicycling and walking citywide. Implement the Bicycle Master Plan included in the Community Mobility Chapter. Require that pedestrian facilities and connections be provided as part of all development projects, with an emphasis on connections within Mixed Use districts. Implement all bicycling and walking policies and Mobility ENG PL, RD A, D, I 4 Element components. Preparation and distribute bike route maps and bike facilities information. Publish and make readily available pedestrian route maps and pedestrian facilities information. Encourage all feasible measures to reduce total vehicle miles CM-2.2 O traveled by automobiles, including enhanced transit access and land use approaches that provide compact and focused development along major transit corridors. Same actions as identified for LU-2.1,LU-5.4, LU-5.6, and CM-2.1. ENG PL A, D, I 4 CM-2.3 0 Support the use of hybrid,electric,and low/zero emission vehicles. Continue to maintain the Green Team Sustainability Action Matrix that identifies current and proposed efforts that procure vehicles that includes providing gas-efficient vehicles. CM PL,AS, A, E, F 7 PW Amend the Development Code as appropriate to accommodate alternative fuel service stations and charging facilities. CM-24 O Replace City vehicles with energy-efficient and alternative fuel source models when replacing vehicles or adding to the City's fleet. Appendix A:Implementation Plan A-20 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Action >.. Type a a General Plan Policy c d m > a T ` E 5 0 o 0 a) .1 `o K C LC c CO C >, C 0) >. a m N O O ..T. `9 •°1 w Implementation Aclion(s) E a a ° o o 2 a t` v ' K c th `a a CO a c a Explore the Feasibility of Extending Local Transit Service Explore the possibility of extending to adjacent jurisdictions in cooperation with such jurisdictions who could also participate in funding, if beneficial to the City. Work with Regional Transit Operators(Omnitrans) Develop the optimum coordination and integration of bus transit services between the local City circulator system and the regional service. Consult with Omnitrans to establish and maintain transit hubs at CM-3.4 p Victoria Gardens, Chaffey College, the Metrolink Station, and other locations as appropriate to facilitate use of transit and transfers between transit services. Same action as identified'for CM-3.1. ENG PL A. 4 Consider and evaluate the possible relocation of the Metrolink CM-3.5 p Station to Haven Avenue to provide improved connections to transit and to support planned transit-oriented land uses along Haven Avenue. Work with Metrolink and Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) to study the feasibility of moving the Metrolink Station from its ENG, current location to Haven Avenue. Explore options for alternative funding PL RD E, F 6 from sources other than the General Fund, such as grants, and specifically grants that promote transit-oriented development. In addition to requiring private development to provide transit amenities, consult with regional transit operators to provide CM-3.6 0 attractive and convenient bus stops, including shadelweather protection, seats, transit Information, and bus shelters as appropriate. Same action as identified for CM-3.1. Also, develop a program, with identified funding sources, for providing amenities at bus stops in the ENG PL D 4 City. Continue to develop and maintain a citywide bicycle network of off- street bike paths, on-street bike lanes, and bike streets to provide CM-3.7 0 0 connections between neighborhoods, schools, parks, civic center/facilities, recreational facilities, and major commercial centers. Appendix A:Implementation Plan RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN A-23 Action Ty•e a a General Plan Policy a 3 > o T U CJ n o a v = m= 0 d' C N f C • a . O O • o• a G Implementation Action(s) a s ` a O. rn c C u_ a` Implement the Bicycle Plan pursuant to Figure CM-6. Update the City's Bicycle Circulation Plan in a format suitable for obtaining public funding. Develop the planning, implementation, and design details of the bicycle facility and amenity elements of the Community Mobility Chapter, including the setting of implementation priorities and the identification of both capital and operating funding sources. Implementation should focus on adding a north-south trail along either Deer Creek or Cucamonga Creek as a first priority. Update the City's Trails Implementation Plan to maintain consistency A, D, with the General Plan. ENG PL E, F, I 4 Review City ordinances to ensure that an adequate mechanism exists to manage the use of trails only by authorized categories of users. Implementation of the Bicycle Plan may require traffic signalization at the crossing of bike paths with arterial roadways to facilitate the safe crossing of those arterials by bicyclists and pedestrians. Signals should be convenient to bicyclists with accessible push-buttons to activate the signal. Provide traffic control push button devices at convenient locations for bicyclists at signalized intersections on the identified Bicycle Network. CM-3.8 O O Continue to encourage the provision of bicycle facilities, such as bicycle lockers and secure bike parking,throughout the City. Identify existing locations where bicycle lockers and secure bicycle parking could be provided at key locations throughout put the City, and develop a funding and implementation plan. Encourage/require the provision of bicycle lockers and secure bike parking for major development projects, as defined in the Development P A, D. Code. L ENG E, F, H 4 Modify the Development Code to require provision of bicycle parking spaces, bicycle lockers, and, as appropriate, showers for bicycle riders at new buildings providing significant employment, at transit stations, in the commercial districts,and at recreational destinations in the City. Identify and implement a dedicated funding source for CM-3.9 0 implementation and completion of the Bicycle Network as identified in the Bicycle Plan. — Same action as identified for CM-3.7. ENG E, F 4 CM- 0 Continue to complete the installation of sidewalks and require new 3.10 development to provide sidewalks. Use the CIP to identify a schedule for installing new and replacement sidewalks throughout the City, placing priority on installing missing ENG B, C, 4 sidewalks near schools and activity centers, and replacing sidewalks that D, have been identified as hazardous to public safety. Appendix A:Implementation Plan A-24 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Action Type a General Plan Policy c L c w > a �` 2 d a _ 0 rn o a re c K ca co re T c a) 7 U n A O O S 2 w m Implementation Action(s) E a w c `o o . a 3 w c a. a w a` en cc u_ a` Strategize with Foundation members to increase the range of Cs A, H involvement in Foundation events. Provide a comprehensive, interconnected off-road trail system that CS-6.1 0 provides alternative mobility choices throughout the entire City and increases connectivity. Continue to implement the principles of the Trails Implementation Plan. PL ENG A, I 4 Connect trails in Rancho Cucamonga to trails in the San Bernardino CS-6.2 0 National Forest and other hillside open space areas. These trails shall include trailheads with vehicle parking and other amenities. Coordinate with Federal and State agencies to facilitate funding and acquisition of trail connections from the City to the San Bernardino .PL ENG A 5 National Forest. Connect new trails with the North Etiwanda Preserve. CS-6.3 O Continue to incorporate, where feasible, regional and community trails along utility corridors and drainage channels. y Continue to make trail connections within the City on existing public- CS, agency owned properties. PL ENG A 5 Continue to maintain and pursue the development of planned trails CS-6.4 0 and facilities for equestrian use within the Equestrian/Rural Area designation. L Continue to ensure that trails accommodate equestrian users through details outlined in the Trails Implementation Plan within north Alta Loma PL ENG C,B 4 and Etiwanda. Improve existing trails by removing barriers, applying sustainability CS-6.5 0 concepts, improving safety and function, and providing access to adjacent trails. Continue to program funding into the CIP for the improvements to ENG PL, BS A 4 deficient equestrian trails, as outlined in the Trails Implementation Plan. Require new development to provide access to adjacent trails and CS-6.6 O provide appropriate trail amenities (e.g., benches, drinking fountains, hitching posts, bike stands, and other amenities) for all new projects located adjacent to regional or community trails. Require new development projects adjacent to Regional or Community PL ENG A, K 4 Trails to provide access to and amenities for trails. CS-6.7 O Continue to credit publically accessible trailway acreage towards meeting parkland dedication standards. Continue to allow parkland credit for trails within development projects, PL ENG A,K 4 subject to adopted criteria. Appendix A:Implementation Plan A-36 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Action > Type a u a General Plan Policy m c ; > o ` v a o c• e c rY c a cc) cc T c e)o C C o a iiiii ,P, Implementation Action(s) E a m c `o_ o 0 a C 4! o a a N a` CO x u 0. Develop a listing of acceptable fire-resistant plant types to be PW' PL ENG, A 3 incorporated into new and rehabilitated development sites. FD Encourage streetscape design and landscaping programs for LU-10.4 0 commercial frontages that create vibrant places which support walking,bicycling,transit,and sustainable economic development. Same action as identified for LU-3.4. PL EN , A 4 Consult with and coordinate with the Santa Fe Railway to develop LU-10.5 0 and install a landscape plan for the enhancement of the railroad right-of-way. Inventory and assess the landscaping needs of the rail corridor, and ENG, consult with the rail agency to develop a plan. PL RD A 6 Continue to pursue strategies to reduce long-term operation and LU-10.6 0 maintenance costs within the City's Landscape Maintenance Districts and other publicly funded areas. Inventory and prioritize the removal of turf areas within landscape medians to be replaced with plantings that reduce long-term operations PW ENG A 5 and maintenance costs. Continue to implement and update as necessary the City's Sign LU-11.1 0 0 Ordinance In order to provide for a reasonable system of review and incentives for well-designed signs throughout the City. L Establish a periodic review schedule of all City ordinances that govern aesthetics to determine if industry standards have changed or if other PL RD A, K 4 objectives are desirable that require amendments. Continue to require the undergrounding of utility lines and facilities LU-11.2 0 0 wherever feasible to minimize the unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures. Require undergrounding of utilities for new development. Develop a A, B, strategy and prioritization list for the undergrounding utilities in developed ENG PL G I 4 areas. LU-113 O O Require communication towers to be located and designed to blend with the surrounding environment. Review and update design guidelines for the siting and general appearance of communication towers to facilitate the least amount of PL A 4 visual intrusion. Emphasize use of stealth and architecturally integrated antenna. Ensure that streetscape design along roadways creates a strong LU-12.1 O landscaped edge, provides a coherent high-quality appearance along each route, and enhances the image of adjacent . development. Appendix A:Implementation Plan RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN A-13 Action « Ty•e a u o General Plan Policy .y c 3 > c u c ° o T ` m a a in =v a lit r e E c ._ a) > c rn m O o c •o v. Implementation Action(s) E a uai c o a n. en a` ca 0 u_ a` PL,AS, A, B, Same actions as identified for RC-4.1 to RC-4.5. ENG ENG, C, E, 3 CM, BS, G, I PW, FIN Encourage development of transit-oriented and infill development, PS-12.3 0 and encourage a mix of uses that foster walking and alternative transportation. Same action as identified for RC-4.4. PL ENG A, I 3 Provide enhanced bicycling and walking infrastructure,and support PS-12.4 0 public transit, including public bus service, the Metrolink, and the potential for Bus Rapid Transit(BRT). Same action as identified for RC-4.4. PL ENG A, I 3 Provide green building incentives, assess green building techniques as a formal stage of project review,and develop a green PS-12.5 0 building ordinance or program that addresses both new and existing buildings.Adaptation strategies will also include increased water efficiency in buildings. Same actions as identified for RC-6.1 to RC-6.4 PL ENG A, I, K 4 Encourage efforts to reduce waste generation and re-use and PS-12.6 0 support increased recycling and composting opportunities with a focus on large commercial and industrial waste producers. Same action as identified for PF-7.1. ENG PL A 3 PS-12.7 O O Support tree planting, planting more vegetation (including native and drought-resistant planting),and preservation of open space. Same actions as identified for RC-1.1, RC-8.1 to RC-8.7. PL PW' A, I 4 PS-12.8 O Develop green procurement plans and ensure energy savings in City operations and maintenance. Same actions as identified for RC-5.1 to RC-5.3. AS CM, FIN, A, B, C, 4 PW E,K Develop energy- or climate change-themed publications and workshops,facilitating energy audits for residents,and establishing PS-12.9 O partnerships to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Increase public awareness about climate change, and encourage residents and businesses to become involved in activities and lifestyle changes that help reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Same action as identified for RC-5.1. CM ENG A, K 4 Consider the compatibility of proposed land uses with the noise environment when preparing or revising community and/or specific PS-13.1 0 plans and when reviewing development proposals. The contour map depicting future noise levels(Figure PS-10)should be used by the City as a guide to land use/noise compatibility. Appendix A:Implementation Plan A-57 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN ....„--,,,-1-77,74,777,„ ..e.cci.. „---. • •,,.• k-c,... . •..;-V ,..-" „, 4:14-;?:•! • , .*-. :Jr t4-', ''..,.:4-,,t ,:::,.., .•• , . : / y , - .'• ),., ir ' • ' ( / - C., I. \-- , _•• ---\ 747,--, ITT) AttiAT ,,:,,,T,T, , ,,, 1 . MUNI k_.)1 rsn I u. --), LITY e,N, ( ‘. Ai- „...) -'4;. p'' ,,-.4.4,4‘ 4'ttFatt •-• cs,,i,..-11:,57.re4i . ...,4"--\,\ Lyt..„ ,•:.„ • ,, ., ),2)e 'r '.,i, •1 : 41 4 1.,:t.:?- ::•,. • -....,, '.\ , .. ., . ..,...._:......_,L1, • v.,. „:77:07.,,,, P l .... . ...., .. .. , ...) .. _ . . A --\\, - mi HO --) , ..., f--, , : -s\ t'kl 4( il ' -} y A : -__ - ON GA,----, A . 1 I 1 1 IP I k VT ON 1 "TrA A 1 J ..,..-A i ' -:' -. '` '-' ' --... ,...../ Action >. Type a u a General Plan Policy c U c 3 > o T v j r y - v C C r c co A c r 0 m .5 Implementation Action(s) E a H c o o ° a d CL a V) a` in z a a. RC-8.7 O O Support protection of natural habitat areas for ecological, educational,and other scientific study purposes. Same action as identified for RC-8.3. PL ENG A, I 4 PF-1.1 O Continue to implement high-quality standards for new public facilities and improvements to existing buildings. Design and build all City buildings to serve as a model for quality architectural treatment and green building design in all new and PL ENG A, B,C 5 remodeled civic facilities. PF-1.2 O Promote community facilities as focal points for gatherings,events, and celebrations. Maintain all public facilities and buildings to address the needs of the • various neighborhoods within the City. Advertise the availability of civic PW CS, LIB A. B,C 3 ' facilities to community groups. PF-1.3 O Locate new community facilities in neighborhoods and centers where they will serve populations with the greatest needs. Review and assess the needs for the location of community facilities as CS ENG, PL A 6 neighborhoods evolve. PF-1.4 O O Maintain public facilities and optimize their usefulness during their lifespan. Continue with proper maintenance programming and funding levels for CS,LIB, existing public facilities. PW AC A, B, C 4 PF-1.5 O O Continue to incorporate low-maintenance features into public facilities consistent with the City's sustainability plan. Replace features of public facilities with lower maintenance types as part PL, CS, of the on-going maintenance program. PW BS A, B,C 3 PF-1.6 O Maintain multi-functional, flexible, and complementary space at community facilities. Same action as identified for PF-1.2. CS PW A, B, C 3 Maximize public facility use by sharing with nonprofit organizations, school districts, and community organizations. Look PF-1.7 0 for opportunities to create joint-use community space at facilities owned by private organizations such as faith-based groups and service clubs. Same action as identified for CS-2.5. CS A 4 Consult with local school districts to enhance the development of PF-2.1 O O joint-use agreements, allowing for optimum use of school facilities, to provide broad community benefits such as public safety and education. Continue and expand joint use of facilities to achieve even greater CS SD A,K 5 optimization of school facilities to service the entire community. Appendix A:Implementation Plan A-44 R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A G E N E R A L P L A N Action >, Type a al a, General Plan Policy c m 2 ) 'n N w D `m v ? a, 0)70 0 y K .0 cc r ._ co T c 4 T T U A 0 0 C . m Implementation Action(s) E a w °c o o 2 0. ` r 0 0. 0. m a m a U. a` Pursue efforts to reduce energy consumption through appropriate RC-4.1 0 energy conservation and efficiency measures throughout all segments of the community. As it becomes economically practical, identify sources and replace A B imported, non-renewable energy resources with domestic renewable pt. ENG, C, E, 5 energy sources such as solar and wind energy, recycled municipal solid CM G waste,and green waste. Promote the use of renewable energy and alternative energy technology, and support efforts to develop small-scale, distributed energy generation (e.g. solar,wind, cogeneration, and biomass)to RC-4.2 0 reduce the amount of electricity drawn from the regional power grid and reduce the use of natural gas, while providing Rancho Cucamonga, with a greater degree of energy and economic self- . sufficiency. Provided that there would not be a decline in services to City residents or A B undue tax burden, use of energy efficiency and renewable energy AS,CM, C ID resources will be employed for approving capital and operational ENG PL E,G, I 6 expenditures. RC-4.3 O Encourage the use of solar energy systems in homes and commercial businesses. Establish design criteria for active and passive solar applications within PL ENG, A 5 development proposals. BS Reduce operational energy requirements through sustainable and RC-4.4 O O complementary land use and circulation planning. Support implementation of State mandates regarding energy consumption and greenhouse gas reduction,including AB32 and 56375. Promote land use and circulation patterns that result in multi-purpose automobile trips and that facilitate the use of local and regional transit; continue to advance land use patterns that provide employment and PL ENG A, I 3 housing opportunities for City residents in a manner that allows for practical options for mobility other than by automobile. Support the development of private sources of sustainable and RC-4.5 0 0 environmentally friendly energy supplies, provided these are consistent with City aesthetic and public safety goals. Continue to make the recruitment and retention of "green" industries a CM, priority in conjunction with economic development strategies. RD PL A, G 4 Serve as a role model by adopting recognizable standards and incorporating the use of sustainable strategies for new and existing RC-5.1 0 public buildings that maximize occupant health and productivity, minimize operating costs, and provide good environmental stewardship. Appendix A:Implementation Plan A-40 R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A G E N E R A L P L A N et., • ,.. A r-4.40riairrA,.,., ',,--,.a,,, if c ',:tfj.; ,..ktritlilii itt ., sy. .* cc': i1/2 g' .i',..to'.. *qt."... A tr Yr •',P . ( \ .:: TN .. 1 tli - i . t - If I rt , , ,.‘ . ,. __. A ). .,._ .# ... f \ ,iret_ky :Th.‘„. .1. %., ... s .„. ,vt .,.. ,i.e.: ; sty...st: • lc , ,.., r_ tbic,..,1444,?: . . .. 1. . .€ 4,...., , ...i.,. , i2.:..,,...„ . ,te,,, A-:„t..2 -ig' \ - 711' t- I• ...cotl'Lp.,,,c. A -- J Ebi Araik, , .. , :",T4 tt:i.-;:r*, .__, ii -1 A L\' IL '---' 0 ii, ,, _. 4 .E.. 4. -._.,-- e-- A I . 7 f fr ‘i A A 7 ON .1 4 :t '4 J \....1 C't\ l 'i L... 't J I ..\. ,..t..,... ..., i ' Action Type c at a General Plan Policy o T u ) (U > 0 M `a re c K c. to ez >. t c O r To, R c e y Implementation Action(s) E a m c `o_ o a a v a a. a CO a N C U. a Continue to assess that the recreational needs of the City's residents are consistent with the City's parkland standard, and determine possible re- CS PL, ENG A 4 use or conversion of infill sites for recreational uses to serve areas within the City with a disproportionate amount of parkland. Develop parks that contribute to active and healthy lifestyles, and CS-1.2 0 allow for a balanced commitment to both organized recreation activities and passive park environments. Move forward with plans to continue to develop Central Park, expand Etiwanda Creek Park, add one new Community park, one new Special CM, Use Facility, and two new Neighborhood parks. Incorporate active and CS ENG A 4 passive facilities into new parks. CS-1.3 O Continue to develop Central Park.as envisioned in the Central Park . Master Plan. Continue to prioritize implementation of the improvements for Central CS ENG, PL A 4 Park as part of the City's CIP process. CS-1.4 O Pursue developing an outdoor special use facility that includes a multi-field sports complex. Continue to prioritize development of a sports complex and determine CS ENG, A 4 funding mechanisms,including corporate sponsorships/partnerships. RD, PL Continue to require new development to provide needed park CS-1.5 0 facilities through the various measures and tools available to the City(e.g.,in-lieu fees andfor land dedication). Continue to make the provision of tum-key park and recreational facilities ENG, A, D, I, the first priority over in-lieu fees for new residential development. PL CS K 4 Pursue and expand joint-use of public lands that are available and CS-1.6 O suitable for recreational purposes, including school district properties and flood control district,water district, and other utility properties. Continue to coordinate with other agencies holding public lands for possible joint-use, trail easements, or re-use to serve park/recreation PL ENG A, K 4 particularly with school district properties. Encourage public safety and compatibility with adjacent uses CS-1.7 O through park location and design, including the location of buildings, lighting, parking, public transit, emergency access, and pedestrianlbicycle access. Continue to utilize the Recreation Needs and System Recommendation CS PL, ENG A, K 4 Study and the park master plan concept in park planning. CS-1.8 O O Continue to build, renovate, and maintain parks in a manner that is environmentally sustainable. Appendix A:implementation Plan A-32 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Action >, Type a to ° General Plan Policy c iii o • 3 ° r c e > A 0 = a o o c co'a fn > ~ C 0 T >' Ti m 0 o E + '9 c .11 Implementation Action(s) E a CO a c `o_ O O` Q ° ° C. a rn a` rn W u_ o- Continue to provide for maintenance, renovation and new construction of City parks in compliance with City policies, upgrading wastewater ENG CS, PL, A, B, C 4 systems as needed, and as technology evolves, substitute material that PW could reduce maintenance costs and is environmentally friendly. Develop intermediate sized (10-12 acre) parks with lighted athletic CS-1,9 0 fields and appropriate parking to accommodate community sports programs. Update the City's Recreation Needs and Systems Recommendation Study to determine the location for intermediate-sized park sites CS PL, ENG A, B, C 7 specifically developed for athletic field use. This may include joint-use facilities with a school district. Integrate Healthy RC activities, classes, and programs with ' CS-2.1 I 0 recreational services that contribute to 'the health, fitness, and minds of participants. Continue to provide City-sponsored recreational programs and classes at CS CM A, I 4 recreational centers/parks. CS 22 O O Provide high-quality Community Services programs that are flexible and responsive to the community's changing needs. Continue to provide active recreational opportunities through leagues cs CM A, I 4 and organized sports. Plan and conduct community special events that bring residents CS-2.3 0 together to create an enhanced quality of life and promote economic development. Plan for community events through the annual budgeting process. CS , • RD, CM A, I 4 Continue to consult with non-profit sports organizations and CS-2.4 0 recreational groups to support their offering of diverse recreational programs that complement and supplement those of the City. Continue to serve as a clearinghouse to coordinate among the various CS A, I 4 sport leagues to make fields and facilities available. Continue.to make community facilities and park amenities available CS-2.5 0 for rental by community residents, non-profit groups and businesses to meet their recreational and business needs. Continue to promote the City's various rental facility types by ensuring that a complete summary of locations, facilities, services, fees, and CS A 4 applications are available. Continue broad-based public outreach activities that inform • CS-2.6 O residents of all available Community Services programs and services, and obtain input from the community regarding program 1 and service needs. Appendix A:Implementation Plan A-33 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Action '' Type u General Plan Policy c 3 a, u G — 0 2 d a a _ o o y m m o W K C re « ' V! �, V A N o o c .2 g 9. Implementation Action(s) E c m o 0 ao a` v)i a` • rn ce u o` RC-8.7 O O Support protection of natural habitat areas for ecological, educational,and other scientific study purposes. Same action as identified for RC-8.3. PL ENG A, I 4 PF-1.1 O Continue to implement high-quality standards for new public facilities and improvements to existing buildings. Design and build all City buildings to serve as a model for quality architectural treatment and green building design in all new and PL ENG A,B,C 5 remodeled civic facilities. PF-1.2 O Promote community facilities as focal points for gatherings,events, and celebrations. Maintain all public facilities and buildings to address the needs of the various neighborhoods within the City. Advertise the availability of civic PW 'CS, LIB A, B, C 3 facilities to community groups. PF-1.3 O Locate new community facilities in neighborhoods and centers where they will serve populations with the greatest needs. Review and assess the needs for the location of community facilities as CS ENG, PL A 6 neighborhoods evolve. PF-1.4 O O Maintain public facilities and optimize their usefulness during their lifespan. Continue with proper maintenance programming and funding levels for PW CS, LIB, ABC 4 existing public facilities. AC PF-1.5 O O Continue to incorporate low-maintenance features into public facilities consistent with the City's sustainability plan. Replace features of public facilities with lower maintenance types as part pW PL,CS, A, B, C 3 of the on-going maintenance program. BS PF-1.6 O Maintain multi-functional, flexible, and complementary space at community facilities. Same action as identified for PF-1.2. CS PW A, B,C 3 Maximize public facility use by sharing with nonprofit organizations,school districts,and community organizations. Look PF-1.7 0 for opportunities to create joint-use community space at facilities owned by private organizations such as faith-based groups and , service clubs. Same action as identified for CS-2.5. CS A 4 Consult with local school districts to enhance the development of PF-2.1 O O joint-use agreements, allowing for optimum use of school facilities, to provide broad community benefits such as public safety and education. Continue and expand joint use of facilities to achieve even greater CS SD A, K 5 optimization of school facilities to service the entire community. Appendix A:Implementation Plan A-44 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN - A .,r,,-„;:<; -;--- .-..' - mss ... .. f , .IL*kg // (&y� �. jµy. M J q3,� tlY� P Y M` C . 3 1 ili .4Viika C `//// . .. i ..)...., 1111' ".* 7 ,:. i.RAJLR! [}31 TflSTNGS •dp,{�. JE 4 4 it' 'l Y < SWi zJ 3s / I#'F9;I..., ail t 1 3 may/ Trs 11 :9 ANC � T: (. Action Type d u General Plan Policy m • d = °o ? c v` t 0' — O 01 a E re C d rn cc T t c m n o o Y• d a Implementation Action(s) E a to c o_ a a a 'ii o ` rn ` cn rr ri It Continue to provide a safe and efficient street system in the City,to CM-1.1 0 support mobility goals, all transportation modes, and the goals of Managing the Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources Chapter. Add the intersection improvements listed below to the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) or appropriate equivalents identified and approved by the City Engineer in the future that would offset the identified impacts; implement the improvements as funding becomes available. Prepare a report on the need for the improvements and their relationship to the impacts caused by new development in Rancho Cucamonga. • Work with Caltrans and SANBAG to implement a new freeway interchange at 1-15 and Arrow Highway. • • Complete Wilson Avenue between Milliken Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard. ENG A, D, I 7 • Complete Rochester Avenue between Banyan Street and Wilson Avenue. • Pursue Federal funds for a grade separation of the SPRR at Etiwanda Avenue. • Complete storm drain and widening of Hellman Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Cucamonga Creek. • Complete Wilson Avenue from East Avenue to Wardman Bullock. • Improve the Base Line Road at I-15 Freeway Interchange. • Complete Youngs Canyon from Cherry Avenue to Banyan Street. Provide an integrated network of roadways that provides for CM-1.2 0 convenient automobile, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian circulation movement around the City. Same actions as identified for CM-2.1 and CM-3.7. ENG PL A, D, I 4 Complete the circulation system by constructing new roadway CM-1.3 0 facilities and freeway interchanges pursuant to the Circulation Plan (Figure CM-2). Identify in the CIP future projects and new roadways based on available ENG PL A, D, I 4 funding. CM-1.4 0 O Provide access for seniors and those with physical disabilities in all elements of the transportation system. Continue to operate the Silver Fox Express. Consult with Omnitrans regarding providing ACCESS transportation services. ENG CS A, E. 4 Require that all new future transportation facilities have appropriate and F, H, I adequate access for seniors and people with physical disabilities. Appendix A:Implementation Plan A-19 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GE N ERAL PLAN Action Type a General Plan Policy •� u > v c a d o m K = D_' c T c T a U A A 0 0 C 2 m Implementation Action(s) E a n c `o o a a - o a 0. a CO d m cc LL d Complete intersection capacity improvements, coordinate traffic signals utilizing Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), and improve striping and signage. Striping shall maximize room for bike lanes where feasible and consistent with the Bicycle Plan. Modernize traffic signal equipment as necessary, and continue to update traffic signal timing and ENG PW A, D 3 synchronization plans to optimize traffic flow along the key arterial corridors, taking into account the needs of transit, bicyclists, and pedestrians as well. Invest in the communications infrastructure necessary to operate a Citywide traffic signal control system. Continue to design and operate arterials and intersections for the CM-4.2 0 safe operation of all modes, Including transit, bicyclists, and pedestrians. • Same action as identified for CM-4.1. • ENG A, D 3 • CM-4.3 O Continue to implement Intelligent Transportation System Measures and advanced traffic management technologies where appropriate. Same action as identified for CM-4.1. ENG PW E' �' 3 Maintain the City's transportation infrastructure in good condition; CM-4.4 0 0 develop and maintain adequate funding sources for it's ongoing maintenance and upkeep. Continue to implement and follow the schedule for resurfacing streets ENG A, D, 4 and streets improvements per the CIP. E, F Continue to require that new development participates in the cost of CM-5.1 0 transportation mitigation and improvements necessitated by new development, including non-automobile solutions. Require payment of Traffic Impact Fees as approved by the City Council, used to finance specific improvements made necessary by new development. The relationship between the fees, the cost of the ENG PL D 4 improvements, and new development has been established in fee analyses approved by the City Council. These fees shall be reviewed from time to time and adjusted as needed. Require evaluation of potential traffic and transportation impacts CM-52 O associated with new development prior to project approval, and require adequate mitigation measures, including non-automobile solutions, prior to,or concurrent with,project development. Require applicants to prepare traffic and transportation impact assessments consistent with adopted City guidelines and standards. Continue to require sidewalks, pedestrian paths, and connections to be ENG D 4 provided as part of new development projects to improve and enhance access between neighborhoods, and from neighborhoods to schools, parks,trails,commercial centers,and other activity centers. Appendix A:Implementation Plan A-26 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Q4,. „t.W p :, cif, itirtUttAtOr ,,,t. Ns (-• , ..-,•,?\c frr.fi,.--,:"r):.4,,.°...0 4.0.r,,,i.-TRF;II \ .335 .Y s •af'y: a„" t `,: k°' ,Pet , f ' M _ ... { _.° at..mac ,,-:-. _ _ k " .I` 4ac 4 y.-" ,� . A c, k ( ;,mo d L 'V '. i. , '.C....I i Action '` Type 3 a General Plan Policy o u U ] c a a ] a vi 0 0 w C K C a N z r cc rn T T U A is o o C _ o u v Implementation Action(s) E 0. o o a. — 7 v 7 o. 0_ CO d N K U e. Continue to provide a safe and efficient street system in the City,to CM-1.1 O support mobility goals, all transportation modes, and the goals of Managing the Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources Chapter. Add the intersection improvements listed below to the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) or appropriate equivalents identified and approved by the City Engineer in the future that would offset the identified impacts; implement the improvements as funding becomes available. Prepare a report on the need for the improvements and their relationship to the impacts caused by new development in Rancho Cucamonga. • Work with Caltrans and SANBAG to implement a new freeway interchange at 1-15 and Arrow Highway. • Complete Wilson Avenue between Milliken Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard. ENG A, D, I 7 • Complete Rochester Avenue between Banyan Street and Wilson Avenue. • Pursue Federal funds for a grade separation of the SPRR at Etiwanda Avenue. • Complete storm drain and widening of Hellman Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Cucamonga Creek. • Complete Wilson Avenue from East Avenue to Wardman Bullock. • Improve the Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway Interchange. • Complete Youngs Canyon from Cherry Avenue to Banyan Street. Provide an integrated network of roadways that provides for CM-1.2 0 convenient automobile, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian circulation movement around the City. Same actions as identified for CM-2.1 and CM-3.7. ENG PL A, D, 1 4 Complete the circulation system by constructing new roadway CM-1.3 0 facilities and freeway interchanges pursuant to the Circulation Plan (Figure CM-2). Identify in the CIP future projects and new roadways based on available ENG PL A, D, 1 4 funding. CM-1.4 O O Provide access for seniors and those with physical disabilities in all elements of the transportation system. Continue to operate the Silver Fox Express. Consult with Omnitrans regarding providing ACCESS transportation services. ENG CS A, E. 4 Require that all new future transportation facilities have appropriate and F, H, I adequate access for seniors and people with physical disabilities. Appendix A:Implementation Plan A-19 R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A G E N E R A L PLAN Action Type • u v General Plan Policy c 3 v P. 0 o > 0 T 0 A N = z L. d re E cc c ti N 2 10 G S r P .c Implementation Action(s) E a m 0 c o o ° a. - d z o_ a y o` rn u. a` Implement street design standards per this General Plan, except that modified standards may be applied where appropriate on CM-1.5 O arterial corridors relating to transit,bicycle facilities,sidewalks,and on-street parking to be context sensitive to adjacent land uses and districts, and to all roadway users, including transit, bicycles, and pedestrians. • Integrate into the CIP process the planning of modified standards for Foothill Boulevard to accommodate BRT and for other arterials as ENG PL A, D, I 4 appropriate to reflect the bikeway plan and pedestrian improvements necessary to support Mixed Use districts. CM-7.6 O Pursue a railroad grade separation at Etiwanda Avenue and the BNSF Railway line. Grade separations currently exist at Haven and Milliken Avenues. Due to truck traffic associated with the southeast industrial area, the City ENG PL A, E, I 4 supports creating a railroad grade separation at Etiwanda Avenue and the BNSF Railway line. CM-2.1 0 0 Facilitate bicycling and walking citywide. Implement the Bicycle Master Plan included in the Community Mobility Chapter. Require that pedestrian facilities and connections be provided as part of all development projects, with an emphasis on connections within Mixed Use districts. Implement all bicycling and walking policies and Mobility ENG PL, RD A, D, I 4 Element components. Preparation and distribute bike route maps and bike facilities information. Publish and make readily available pedestrian route maps and pedestrian facilities information. Encourage all feasible measures to reduce total vehicle miles CM-22 O traveled by automobiles, including enhanced transit access and land use approaches that provide compact and focused development along major transit corridors. Same actions as identified for LU-2.1, LU-5.4, LU-5.6, and CM-2.1. ENG PL A, D, I 4 CM-2.3 0 Support the use of hybrid,electric,and low/zero emission vehicles. Continue to maintain the Green Team Sustainability Action Matrix that identifies current and proposed efforts that procure vehicles that includes providing gas-efficient vehicles. CM PL,AS, A, E, F 7 Amend the Development Code as appropriate to accommodate alternative fuel service stations and charging facilities. CM-2.4 O Replace City vehicles with energy-efficient and alternative fuel source models when replacing vehicles or adding to the City's fleet. Appendix A:Implementation Plan A-20 RANCHO C U C A M O N G A G E N E R A L P L A N • Action Type o General Plan Policy c 3 > n � v d rna E re T c rn v Implementation Action(s) E a w °c `- o O` a - U 7 • a a Co o` co cc u. a` Complete intersection capacity improvements, coordinate traffic signals utilizing Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), and improve striping and signage. Striping shall maximize room for bike lanes where feasible and consistent with the Bicycle Plan. Modernize traffic signal equipment as necessary, and continue to update traffic signal timing and ENG PW A, D 3 synchronization plans to optimize traffic flow along the key arterial corridors, taking into account the needs of transit, bicyclists, and pedestrians as well. Invest in the communications infrastructure necessary to operate a Citywide traffic signal control system. Continue to design and operate arterials and intersections for the CM-4.2 0 safe operation of all modes, including transit, bicyclists, and pedestrians. Same action as identified for CM-4.1. ENG A, D 3 CM-4.3 O Continue to implement Intelligent Transportation System Measures and advanced traffic management technologies where appropriate. Same action as identified for CM-4.1. ENG PW E, �' 3 Maintain the City's transportation infrastructure in good condition; CM-4.4 0 0 develop and maintain adequate funding sources for it's ongoing maintenance and upkeep. Continue to implement and follow the schedule for resurfacing streets A, D, and streets improvements per the CIP. ENG E, F 4 Continue to require that new development participates in the cost of CM-5.1 0 transportation mitigation and improvements necessitated by new development,including non-automobile solutions. Require payment of Traffic Impact Fees as approved by the City Council, used to finance specific improvements made necessary by new development. The relationship between the fees, the cost of the ENG PL D 4 improvements, and new development has been established in fee analyses approved by the City Council. These fees shall be reviewed from time to time and adjusted as needed. Require evaluation of potential traffic and transportation impacts CM-52 O associated with new development prior to project approval, and require adequate mitigation measures, including non-automobile solutions, prior to,or concurrent with,project development. Require applicants to prepare traffic and transportation impact assessments consistent with adopted City guidelines and standards. Continue to require sidewalks, pedestrian paths, and connections to be ENG D 4 provided as part of new development projects to improve and enhance access between neighborhoods, and from neighborhoods to schools, parks,trails, commercial centers,and other activity centers. • Appendix A:implementation Plan A-26 R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A G E N E R A L P L A N Action A Type u o General Plan Policy `>c a a d a O - cnz O 5 re c O .E N N T c m re A C ro°i v Implementation Action(s) E a w c o 0 0.. a va) a fn' r IL a. ED-37 O O Support access to local and regional educational resources that provide educational opportunities to local residents and workers. Coordinate with local and regional centers for higher education to RD PL, CM A 4 promote access to and programs for additional educational opportunities. ED-4.1 0 Encourage high-quality design for infill development and continue to support new high quality uses. Same action as identified for LU-5.1 to 5.6. PL ENG A, I,K 4 ED-4.2 0 Make green building and green business a priority. Same action as identified for LU-7.1 to 7.3. PL RD A,G 3 ED-43 O O Improve connectivity between development projects to create a more cohesive atmosphere. Same action as identified for LU-2.3. PL ENG A 5 ED-4.4 0 Focus on enhancements to Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue. Same action as identified for LU-5.1 to 5.6. PL ENG A, I, K 5 ED-4.5 O Review and understand the fiscal, job creation, and economic benefits of new proposed uses in the City's industrial-zoned areas. Focus a special economic development effort on assessing where re-use or conversion of industrial properties to other uses could occur. Identify RD PL A G 5 potential conflicts in order to develop a strategy for when such conversions could be considered a benefit versus a cost. ED-5.1 0 Engage in regional transit planning efforts. Continue to be involved in planning efforts to address regional transportation solutions, particularly those providing transit options. In PL ENG A K 4 particular, work with Omnitrans in its efforts to establish BRT service in Rancho Cucamonga. ED-5.2 O Continue to capitalize on proximity to Interstate 10, Interstate 15, State Route 210,and the LA/Ontario International Airport. Review and assess the effectiveness of way-finding signage to ensure that the City's accessibility to 1-10, 1-15 and SR-210 from major areas of City commerce hubs is easily ascertained and facilitated. Begin RD PL, ENG A,G 4 programs to improve such signage where it is deficient or confusing. Maximize the benefits of a major airport just outside of the City's borders. Provide adequate park and recreational facilities that meet the City CS-1.1 0 standard of 5.0 acres of parkland (including trails and special facilities)for every 1,000 persons. Appendix A:Implementation Plan A-31 R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A G E N E R A L PLAN .„., ;.'•..,.41;:e4.7,4, , ,,,v ., „, .„4 "' /sift.); " ' , ,...,. ,,, ,c, . , 0"4„t. 1/4/. A:terslac,,§7.4.4 0, 'tt ti% Cc, 'el* •'lb•7- \c,,,1 cf,,,,.;' '',..• .,•7;1 ifrt s N.;.-*4*.CE ''''' . 4ft „., e. Ir.,•}• ...l• :- ' 4t. \ te tittf,•••• efr V i It ‘ c 411 4 . • / •---V.r ; I- •• ' • ' ■:, •V.,'4 ••••••••'‘t. . ••• V , ' ----•-• 4 \ ,, bi.. . ..:t i,...,:,.., 0 . -• 4 ' --- \ .....-1 I ' i2 - 1 -,:- . 7: . i r-.4 \ \ 1 f 1 t.;\ c\ 14>,..i R -,,if--\ ,.. . ' ) k 4 / . . _. 4 - ii— \ • Action r Type a a General Plan Policy c m c Liw W ' ° T m N 9 a m o `m ce re co c' N ■_ _ N f. m m a o o E « co .a Implementation Action(s) E a H 3 `o a a Cl) a` in o U.a ` CM- Continue to provide pedestrian amenities on sidewalks on major 3.11 0 streets that are key pedestrian routes, including the provision of benches,shade trees,and trash cans. Identify key pedestrian travel corridors citywide, and prepare a Citywide Pedestrian Circulation Study to determine pedestrian amenity needs, capital and operating funding sources, and a phased implementation program. Develop a program for gradually installing public amenities A B such as streetlights, benches, trash containers, art, drinking fountains, ENG PL C D 5 landscaping, etc. that will enhance the pedestrian environment and encourage increased use of transit. Use both the CIP process and other funding sources, including a program whereby businesses or residents may sponsor street fumiture and/or landscaped areas. CM- Continue to require that the siting and architectural design of new 312 0 development promote safety, pedestrian-friendly design, and • access to transit facilities. Develop standards to be applied to development projects along transit PL ENG I 4 corridors that require transit and pedestrian accessibility. Establish a number of bike hubs in the City (centralized locations CM- 0 with convenient bike parking for trip destinations or transfer to 3.13 other transportation modes), at key transit nodes, and at commercial nodes. Conduct a study to determine the best locations for bike hubs in the City, and develop a plan,wayfinding program, and implementation process for A, B, providing bike hubs that provide secure bicycle lockers. bike racks, and ENG PL, RD C, D 4 connections to transit at key locations in the City. CM- ti Enhance pedestrian and bicycle access to local and regional 3.14 transit,including facilitating connections to transit. Same action as identified for CM-3.7. ENG PL I 4 CM- Coordinate the provision of the non-motorized networks (bicycle 3.15 0 and pedestrian) with adjacent jurisdictions to maximize sub- regional connectivity. • Same action as identified for CM-3.7. ENG PL A, E, F 4 CM- Establish fixed-route local circulator bus service connecting major 3.16 activity centers. Explore development of a fixed-route local circulator bus system, station ENG PL A, E, H 5 location,and funding mechanisms. Continue to Implement traffic management and traffic signal CM-0.1 0 operations measures along the arterial roadway to minimize delay and congestion for all modes, without adversely impacting transit, bicycles,and pedestrians. Appendix A:Implementation Plan A-Z5 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Action Type u, General Plan Policy u 3 > o ` o _ a a• K c c a m c m > U n A O O C « • • m Implementation Action(s) CL a c o 5 o a` Cl) 0- met u o` Complete intersection capacity improvements, coordinate traffic signals utilizing Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), and improve striping and signage. Striping shall maximize room for bike lanes where feasible and consistent with the Bicycle Plan. Modernize traffic signal equipment as necessary, and continue to update traffic signal timing and ENG PW A, D 3 synchronization plans to optimize traffic flow along the key arterial corridors, taking into account the needs of transit, bicyclists, and pedestrians as well. Invest in the communications infrastructure necessary to operate a Citywide traffic signal control system. • Continue to design and operate arterials and intersections for the CM-4.2 0 safe operation of all modes, including transit, bicyclists, and pedestrians. Same action as identified for CM-4.1. ENG A, D 3 CM-43 O Continue to implement Intelligent Transportation System Measures and advanced traffic management technologies where appropriate. Same action as identified for CM-4.1. ENG PW E' F' 3 Maintain the City's transportation infrastructure in good condition; CM-4.4 0 0 develop and maintain adequate funding sources for it's ongoing maintenance and upkeep. Continue'to implement and follow the schedule for resurfacing streets ENG A, D, 4 and streets improvements per the GIP. E,F Continue to require that new development participates in the cost of CM-S.1 0 transportation mitigation and improvements necessitated by new development,including non-automobile solutions. Require payment of Traffic Impact Fees as approved by the City Council, used to finance specific improvements made necessary by new development. The relationship between the fees, the cost of the ENG PL D 4 improvements, and new development has been established in fee analyses approved by the City Council. These fees shall be reviewed from time to time and adjusted as needed. Require evaluation of potential traffic and transportation impacts CM-6.2 O associated with new development prior to project approval, and require adequate mitigation measures, including non-automobile solutions, prior to,or concurrent with,project development. Require applicants to prepare traffic and transportation impact assessments consistent with adopted City guidelines and standards. Continue to require sidewalks, pedestrian paths, and connections to be ENG D 4 provided as part of new development projects to improve and enhance access between neighborhoods, and from neighborhoods to schools, parks,trails, commercial centers, and other activity centers. Appendix A:Implementation Plan A-26 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN ,, .v> ,,, steA .i,v.11,,0:,r,,,Y,,,,‘;t4z ,•,- * 1.1:4474,:.....-- ”" ? • t,t4 4 --41`34'•\-44\5. .;.s.. % tPc,.., a),,;" "":" iri. frn>• '.'"• .,. ! • irk.,,,,-.. • Tr„.; • cr • ;vs,fe . /.. '1"). D . - - --i 24 y-ii.„,..{0:2- w uTU _.,... ,... .....4*.m. ii kts:..ityas R u 7 0:-Niqr $:*:.• 1;1:'. -1•?' ',14'-.0 *"1": • .k, 4.*,..;/:;.--vcilik,,,r4A-. -\ • ;A,,-, .."21" t L.,-; 14',111":" '•- . •=1.cl. ." -.e.0"..,11?"ic, ' i.t, _ ,: ., ; , \ ,.....- t'4' k- ,..s.1:. "*".44 4;• • ' ' '•-•; r -t, P;r1\ ,1/4 -4\ we ITT() I 1`.,\ ' ,...4 . 2 "- "Th1 4 .' 4-Nv ,. .,„ . ...... - 1 r e\ , ,, 1,1") t) to 4 f:'; . '''' . 7 k •1 . 4* . Action Ty?e 3 General Plan Policy c m d o T 2 N K `c c, co K A 0 0 v u Implementation Action(s) E a o °c o o °. a 3 w 3 a 0. co a` rn C u_ rt Continue to provide a safe and efficient street system in the City,to CM-1.1 O support mobility goals, all transportation modes, and the goals of Managing the Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources Chapter. Add the intersection improvements listed below to the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) or appropriate equivalents identified and approved by the City Engineer in the future that would offset the identified impacts; implement the improvements as funding becomes available. Prepare a report on the need for the improvements and their relationship to the impacts caused by new development in Rancho Cucamonga. • Work with Caltrans and SANBAG to implement a new freeway interchange at 1-15 and Arrow Highway. • • • Complete Wilson Avenue between Milliken Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard. ENG A, D, I 7 • Complete Rochester Avenue between Banyan Street and Wilson Avenue. • Pursue Federal funds for a grade separation of the SPRR at Etiwanda Avenue. • Complete storm drain and widening of Hellman Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Cucamonga Creek. • Complete Wilson Avenue from East Avenue to Wardman Bullock. • Improve the Base Line Road at I-15 Freeway Interchange. • Complete Youngs Canyon from Cherry Avenue to Banyan Street. Provide an integrated network of roadways that provides for CM-1.2 0 convenient automobile, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian circulation movement around the City. Same actions as identified for CM-2.1 and CM-3.7. ENG PL A, D, I 4 Complete the circulation system by constructing new roadway CM-1.3 0 facilities and freeway interchanges pursuant to the Circulation Plan (Figure CM-2). Identify in the CIP future projects and new roadways based on available ENG PL A, D, I 4 funding. CM-1.4 O O Provide access for seniors and those with physical disabilities in all elements of the transportation system. Continue to operate the Silver Fox Express. Consult with Omnitrans regarding providing ACCESS transportation services. ENG CS A, E. 4 Require that all new future transportation facilities have appropriate and F, H, I adequate access for seniors and people with physical disabilities. Appendix A:Implementation Plan A-19 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Action _ Type a 0 General Plan Policy 8 ac w c E `w o v rn= 0 y d c K F. c y p. U of O o T °2 .o a Implementation Action(s) E a y o c `o_ o. Complete intersection capacity improvements, coordinate traffic signals utilizing Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), and improve striping and signage. Striping shall maximize room for bike lanes where feasible and consistent with the Bicycle Plan. Modernize traffic signal equipment as necessary, and continue to update traffic signal timing and ENG PW A, D 3 synchronization plans to optimize traffic flow along the key arterial corridors, taking into account the needs of transit, bicyclists, and pedestrians as well. Invest in the communications infrastructure necessary to operate a Citywide traffic signal control system. Continue to design and operate arterials and intersections for the CM-4.2 0 safe operation of all modes, including transit, bicyclists, and pedestrians. Same action as identified for CM-4.1. ENG . A, D 3 CM-4.3 O Continue to implement Intelligent Transportation System Measures and advanced traffic management technologies where appropriate. Same action as identified for CM-4.1. ENG PW E' F' 3 Maintain the City's transportation infrastructure in good condition; CM-4.4 0 0 develop and maintain adequate funding sources for it's ongoing maintenance and upkeep. Continue to implement and follow the schedule for resurfacing streets A. D, and streets improvements per the CIP. ENG E F 4 Continue to require that new development participates in the cost of CM-5.1 0 transportation mitigation and improvements necessitated by new development,including non-automobile solutions. Require payment of Traffic Impact Fees as approved by the City Council, used to finance specific improvements made necessary by new development. The relationship between the fees, the cost of the ENG PL D 4 improvements, and new development has been established in fee analyses approved by the City Council. These fees shall be reviewed from time to time and adjusted as needed. Require evaluation of potential traffic and transportation impacts CM-5.2 O associated with new development prior to project approval, and require adequate mitigation measures, including non-automobile solutions,prior to,or concurrent with,project development. Require applicants to prepare traffic and transportation impact assessments consistent with adopted City guidelines and standards. Continue to require sidewalks, pedestrian paths, and connections to be ENG D 4 provided as part of new development projects to improve and enhance access between neighborhoods, and from neighborhoods to schools, parks,trails,commercial centers,and other activity centers. Appendix A:Implementation Plan A-26 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Action >, . Type a o v General Plan Policy c u 3 > 0 C v o r W 3 q w = 5 `o , a 0 a,a o • ..... ix C cc « - N K m r c o) T m i w Implementation Action(s) E c `til 0• 'LT E. - o v o 'C a a w 0. N z a a Continue to assess that the recreational needs of the City's residents are consistent with the City's parkland standard, and determine possible re- CS PL, ENG A 4 use or conversion of infill sites for recreational uses to serve areas within the City with a disproportionate amount of parkland. Develop parks that contribute to active and healthy lifestyles, and CS-1.2 0 allow for a balanced commitment to both organized recreation activities and passive park environments. Move forward with plans to continue to develop Central Park, expand Etiwanda Creek Park, add one new Community park, one new Special CS CM, A 4 Use Facility, and two new Neighborhood parks. Incorporate active and ENG passive facilities into new parks. CS-1.3 O Continue to develop Central Park as envisioned in the Central Park Master Plan. Continue to prioritize implementation of the improvements for Central CS ENG, PL A 4 Park as part of the City's CIP process. CS-1.4 0 Pursue developing an outdoor special use facility that includes a multi-field sports complex. Continue to prioritize development of a sports complex and determine ENG, CS A 4 funding mechanisms,including corporate sponsorships/partnerships. RD, PL Continue to require new development to provide needed park CS-1.5 0 facilities through the various measures and tools available to the City(e.g.,in-lieu fees and/or land dedication). Continue to make the provision of turn-key park and recreational facilities PL ENG, A, D, I, 4 ' the first priority over in-lieu fees for new residential development. CS K Pursue and expand Joint-use of public lands that are available and CS-1.6 0 suitable for recreational purposes, including school district properties and flood control district,water district, and other utility properties. Continue to coordinate with other agencies holding public lands for CS, possible joint-use, trail easements, or re-use to serve park/recreation PL ENG A,K 4 particularly with school district properties. Encourage public safety and compatibility with adjacent uses CS-1.7 O through park location and design, including the location of buildings, lighting, parking, public transit, emergency access, and pedestrian/bicycle access. Continue to utilize the Recreation Needs and System Recommendation CS PL, ENG A, K 4 • Study and the park master plan concept in park planning. CS-1.8 0 0 Continue to build, renovate, and maintain parks In a manner that is environmentally sustainable. • Appendix A:Implementation Plan A-32 R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A G E N E R A L P L A N Action Type En- o w General Plan Policy 3 > T N N > o u a12 o `m K c c - CO u o m Implementation Action(s) E a ai o a. a Continue to provide for maintenance, renovation and new construction of City parks in compliance with City policies, upgrading wastewater CS, PL, systems as needed, and as technology evolves, substitute material that ENG PW A, B, C 4 could reduce maintenance costs and is environmentally friendly. Develop intermediate sized (10-12 acre) parks with lighted athletic CS-1.9 0 fields and appropriate parking to accommodate community sports programs. Update the City's Recreation Needs and Systems Recommendation Study to determine the location for intermediate-sized park sites CS PL, ENG A,B, C 7 specifically developed for athletic field use. This may include joint-use facilities with a school district. Integrate Healthy RC activities, classes, and programs with CS<2.1 0 recreational services that contribute to the health, fitness, and minds of participants. Continue to provide City-sponsored recreational programs and classes at CS CM A, I 4 recreational centers/parks. CS-2.2 0 0 Provide high-quality Community Services programs that are flexible and responsive to the community's changing needs. Continue to provide active recreational opportunities through leagues CS CM A, I 4 and organized sports. Plan and conduct community special events that bring residents CS-2.3 0 together to create an enhanced quality of life and promote economic development. Plan for community events through the annual budgeting process. CS RD, CM A, I 4 Continue to consult with non-profit sports organizations and CS-2.4 0 recreational groups to support their offering of diverse recreational programs that complement and supplement those of the City. • Continue to serve as a clearinghouse to coordinate among the various CS A, I 4 sport leagues to make fields and facilities available. Continue to make community facilities and park amenities available CS-2.5 0 for rental by community residents, non-profit groups and businesses to meet their recreational and business needs. Continue to promote the City's various rental facility types by ensuring that a complete summary of locations, facilities, services, fees, and CS A 4 applications are available. Continue broad-based public outreach activities that inform CS-2.6 0 residents of.all available Community Services programs and services, and obtain input from the community regarding program and service needs. Appendix A:Implementation Plan A-33 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Action '` Type a c 3 General Plan Policy o >., U U 'q o. 2 4 0 s 0 p,— o K >. c rx T N 0 E d -d Implementation Action(s) E a. w °c o o o O` 0. a U a a vi C. rn cc u. C. Expand recreation and cultural attractions to enhance ED-2.3 0 tourism/visitor potential and to boost sales and transient occupancy tax. Develop brochures or links from the City's web site to showcase the various recreational and cultural venues to attract visitors to the City. Enhancement of cultural amenities, including regional entertainment RD CS A 7 options, recreation, and historic preservation, will help to embellish the City's reputation as a destination for a wide range of visitors. Expand lodging choices in the City through the recruitment and ED-2.4 0 placement of full-service hotels that will complement the existing select-service hotel portfolio. Review and update marketing strategies (land surveys, infrastructure availability, and modes of transportation) to solicit the development of a RD PL A, G 4 full-service lodging facility. Make sure that zoning regulations can accommodate a full-service hotel at desired locations. ED-3.1 0 0 Continue to make public safety a priority. Use the annual budgeting process to allocate funding for public safety services, equipment, and facilities commensurate with the City's service CM PD, FD A 6 objectives. ED-3.2 0 Provide community and cultural amenities. Same action as identified for ED-2.3. CS CM, RD A 4 ED-3.3 0 Maintain a healthy fiscal balance. Use the annual budgeting process to check that revenues from all CM AS FIN A,G 1 sources continue to more than match projected spending. ED-3.4 O O Improve internal circulation for all modes of transportation, consistent with the concept of"Complete Streets". Same action as identified for LU-3.1 to 3.8. ENG PL K' G' 4 E0.3.6 O Facilitate development of additional local and regional entertainment venues. Focus a special economic development team on the task of working towards attracting developers and investors interested in responding to RD PL A, G 6 local and regional demand for new entertainment options. ED-3.6 0 Leverage the City's quality of life amenities to attract more knowledge-based workers. Expand the Economic Development Strategy to market Rancho Cucamonga's civic assets, including parks, recreation and community RD PL,CS A, G 4 enrichment facilities and programs,trails,and quality school districts. Appendix A:Implementation Plan A-30 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Action r Tye u e General Plan Policy d c 3 > o r a °_ n a ✓ 'm 0 as o O cc c K c ._ Cl) re T c 0) > u a `m `0 0 5 °' a Implementation Action(s) E ¢ H co_ 0 ao a` m a` rn al u' a` PL,AS, A B Same actions as identified for RC-4.1 to RC-4.5. ENG ENG, C, E, 3 CM, BS, G, I PW, FIN Encourage development of transit-oriented and infill development, PS-12.3 0 and encourage a mix of uses that foster walking and alternative transportation. Same action as identified for RC-4.4. PL ENG A, I 3 Provide enhanced bicycling and walking infrastructure,and support PS-12.4 0 public transit, including public bus service, the Metrolink, and the potential for Bus Rapid Transit(BRT). Same action as identified for RC-4.4. PL ENG A, I 3 Provide green building incentives, assess green building ' techniques as a formal stage of project review,and develop a green PS-12.5 0 building ordinance or program that addresses both new and existing buildings.Adaptation strategies will also include increased water efficiency in buildings. Same actions as identified for RC-6.1 to RC-6.4 PL ENG A, I, K 4 Encourage efforts to reduce waste generation and re-use and PS-12.6 0 support increased recycling and composting opportunities with a focus on large commercial and industrial waste producers. Same action as identified for PF-7.1. ENG PL A 3 PS-12.7 O O Support tree planting, planting more vegetation (including native and drought-resistant planting),and preservation of open space. Same actions as identified for RC-1.1,RC-8.1 to RC-8.7. PL EN , A, I 4 PS-12.8 O Develop green procurement plans and ensure energy savings in City operations and maintenance. Same actions as identified for RC-5.1 to RC-5.3. AS CM, FIN, A, B, C, 4 PW E,K Develop energy- or climate change-themed publications and workshops,facilitating energy audits for residents,and establishing PS-1Z9 O partnerships to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Increase public awareness about climate change, and encourage residents and businesses to become involved in activities and lifestyle changes that help reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Same action as identified for RC-5.1. CM ENG A, K 4 Consider the compatibility of proposed land uses with the noise environment when preparing or revising community and/or specific PS-13.1 0 plans and when reviewing development proposals. The contour map depicting future noise levels(Figure PS-10)should be used by the City as a guide to land use/noise compatibility. Appendix A:Implementation Plan A-57 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN