HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-56 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 04-56
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE FINAL
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
SUBTT16072, ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM,AND
APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16072, A RESIDENTIAL
SUBDIVISION OF 358 LOTS ON APPROXIMATELY 150.8 ACRES OF LAND
IN THE LOW (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND VERY LOW (.1-2
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS OF THE
ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
WILSON AVENUE BETWEEN ETIWANDA AVENUE AND EAST AVENUE;
AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 0225-083-01, 12,
13, 15, 16 AND 20.
A. Recitals.
1. Richland Pinehurst, Inc. filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map
No. 16072, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject
Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 12th day of May 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing
on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW,THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on May 12, 2004, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to approximately 150.8 acres of property located along the
north side of Wilson Avenue between Etiwanda and East Avenues, and is presently unimproved
property; and,
b. The property along the north boundary of the site is a Southern California Edison
(SCE) power line corridor approximately 330 feet in width, and to the north of the power line corridor
is also undeveloped property currently in the Very Low Residential land use district of the Etiwanda
North Specific Plan; the property to the south consists of the Cucamonga Valley Water District
(CVWD) Water Treatment facility as well as unimproved property within the Very Low Residential
District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; the property to the east is existing single-family residential
development within the Low Residential District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan;and the property
to the west is unimproved property currently within the Very Low Residential District of the Etiwanda
North Specific Plan; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-56
SUBTT16072 — RICHLAND PINEHURST, INC.
May 12, 2004
Page 2
C. The Tentative Tract Map includes 358 lots for single-family residential development.
The northern portion of SUBTT16072 includes 167 lots on 56.61 acres with a density of 2.95 dwelling
units per acre. The southern portion of the project includes 191 lots on 65.71 acres at a density of
2.92 dwelling units per acre. The combined net density of the project is 2.93 dwelling units per acre.
The gross density of the project is 2.38 dwelling units per acre; and
d. The project is consistent with the density provisions of the General Plan Land Use
Designations of Low Residential(2-4 dwelling units per acre) and Very Low Residential(.1-2 dwelling
units per acre) as averaged across the project site (as described in subsection c. above); and,
e. The project includes a Tree Removal Permit, the project site contained several
trees that all burned in October 2003, during the Grand Prix Fire. All remaining trees will be removed
and landscaping within the on-site open space zones will include trees in accordance with species
identified in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan design guidelines for the Upper Etiwanda
Neighborhood theme.
f. The project includes the development of a Community Trail which follows the
alignment of the Red Hill Fault Zone; and,
g. Development of the project site will result in the loss of 147.7 acres of Riversidean
Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub(RAFSS). The project proponent is required through the certification of the
EIR and the adoption of the Mitigation Monitoring Program to acquire a similar amount of off-site
property for habitat preservation and provide an endowment for long-term maintenance; and
h. The project is traversed by the Etiwanda Avenue Scarp of the Red Hill Fault Zone,
thereby dividing the project into a northern portion and a southern portion. The Fault Zone
Boundaries and Restricted Development Areas are identified on the Tentative Tract Map, and the
environmental impacts of the fault zone have been evaluated in the EIR for which mitigation
measures have been included in the Mitigation Monitoring Plan; and,
i. The project will generate approximately 3,436 dailytrips that can be accommodated
through street improvement upgrades as conditioned herein and as required through certification of
the EIR and adoption of the Mitigation Monitoring Program; and,
j. The proposed project, together with all conditions of approval and the provisions of
the Development Agreement, will not be detrimental to the public health and safety, or welfare or
materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. That the Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the General Plan, Development
Code, and any applicable specific plans; and
b. The design or improvements of the Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the
General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and
C. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and
d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental
damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-56
SUBTT16072 — RICHLAND PINEHURST, INC.
May 12, 2004
Page 3
e. The Tentative Tract Map is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and
f. The design of the Tentative Tract Map will not conflict with any easement acquired
by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed
subdivision.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the record of this project,the Planning
Commission makes the following findings and statements, and takes the following actions, pursuant
to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") (Public Resources Code Section 21000 at
seq.):
a. The Project that has been evaluated under CEQA involves a series of actions
related to the annexation of land from unincorporated San Bernardino County into the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, and the approval and development of Tentative Tract Map No. 16072 ("TTM 16072")
and associated Development Agreement. The proposed project includes 358 detached single-family
housing units on approximately 150.8 acres. The density of the project is 2.93 dwelling units per
acre. The gross density of the project including open space, flood control and streets is 2.38
dwelling units per acre. The portion of the Project that requires approval by the Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Commission is TTM 16072.
b. The City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, prepared the Draft
Environmental Impact Report ("Draft EIR") for the Project (State Clearinghouse No. 2002091053).
The Draft EIR was circulated for a 45-day public review and comment period from December 2,
2003,through January 21, 2004. Comments were received during that period and written responses
were prepared and sent to all commentors. Those comments and the responses thereto have been
included in the Final EIR, as have the appendices to the Draft EIR. Those documents together
comprise the Final EIR.
C. The Planning Commission finds that the Final EIR was completed pursuant to the
CEQA, and the State Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA, 14 California Code of Regulations,
Section 15000, at. seq. ("the Guidelines"). The Planning Commission also finds that the Final EIR
represents the independent judgment of the Planning Commission of the Cityof Rancho Cucamonga
and adequately addresses the impacts of the Project and imposes appropriate mitigation measures
for the Project. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the contents of the
Final EIR and has reached its own conclusions with respect to the Project and as to whether and
how to approve Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16072.
d. The Planning Commission hereby certifies the Final EIR as being the environmental
document for the Project and for the Planning Commission action in approving Tentative Tract Map
No. 16072. The Planning Commission finds that the additional information provided in the staff
report, in attachments to the staff report, in the comments to the EIR, and presented at the public
hearing does not represent significant new information so as to require re-circulation of the EIR
pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21092.1.
e. The documents and other materials that constitute the record of the proceedings
which include, but are not limited to, the staff report for the Project, as well as all of the materials that
comprise and support the Final EIR and support the staff reports concerning the Project, are located
in the office of the City Planner of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California 91729. The custodian of these documents is the City Planner of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-56
SUBTT16072 — RICHLAND PINEHURST, INC.
May 12, 2004
Page 4
f. The Planning Commission finds, based upon the Initial Study, the Final EIR, public
comments, public agency comments, and the entire record before it, that the Project may create
significant impacts in the areas of Aesthetics; Air Quality; Biological Resources; Noise; Public
Services; Transportation and Traffic; Cultural Resources; Geology and Soils; and Utilities and
Service Systems. With respect to the impacts to all of these resources and services, the EIR
identifies mitigation measures for each of those impacts that will substantially lessen the impacts.
g. In response to each significant impact identified in the EIR, and listed in paragraph f
of this Section of this Resolution, changes or alterations are hereby required in, or incorporated into
the Project, which avoid or substantially lessen the impacts identified. The specific changes and
alterations required, and a brief explanation of the rationale for the findings with regard to each
impact, are contained in the "Findings of Fact in Support of Findings for Significant Environmental
Effects of the Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map Number 16072 project and statement of
overriding considerations" (Exhibit"A" of the Resolution) and are incorporated herein by reference.
h. Implementation of mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR and imposed as a
condition of the approval of SUBTT16072 will substantially mitigate many of the environmental
impacts described in paragraph f of this Section, to the extent feasible, as described in the attached
Exhibit A. The Final EIR also identifies significant adverse impacts that cannot be fully mitigated or
avoided, including impacts from seismic ground shaking, short-term impacts on air quality from
construction-related emissions, long-term impacts on air quality from project emissions, and
cumulative aesthetic impacts of the visual landscape of the San Gabriel Mountains.
i. The Final EIR describes a range of alternatives to the Project that might fulfill basic
objectives of the Project. These alternatives include the required "No Project/No Development"
alternative, the"Retention of Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub Alternative,"and the"Less Intense
Development"Alternative. As set forth below, the alternatives identified in the EIR are not feasible
because they would not achieve the basic objectives of the Project or would do so only to a much
smaller degree and, therefore, leave unaddressed the significant economic, infrastructure, and
General Plan goals that the Project is intended to accomplish, and are thus infeasible due to social
and economic considerations, and/or they are infeasible because they would not eliminate the
adverse environmental impacts of the proposed Project. Accordingly, each of the alternatives is
infeasible. In making this finding, the Planning Commission determines as follows:
i) The objectives of the Project are to:
a) To provide single-family housing units consistent with the intent of the
City's General Plan and the Etiwanda North Specific Plan.
b) To annex the proposed tentative tract into the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
c) To create a project that is generally consistent and compatible with other
existing and proposed uses in the vicinity of the project and the community of Etiwanda in general.
d) To provide project infrastructure including streets, water and sewer
mains, and flood control consistent with City and regional plans related to these services.
e) To phase the development of the proposed project to ensure adequate
utilities are provided.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-56
SUBTT16072 — RICHLAND PINEHURST, INC.
May 12, 2004
Page 5
f) To design and landscape the proposed project to create an aesthetically
pleasing living environment.
ii) The"No Project/No Development"Alternative assumes that no new land uses
would be constructed on the project site and that the site would remain vacant and undeveloped.
Although this alternative is environmentally superior to the proposed project, it would not meet any of
the project objectives. As the subject property is under private ownership, the elimination of future
development within a previously approved Specific Plan is not legally or financially feasible.
Therefore this alternative is rejected.
iii) The"Retention of Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub"Alternative assumes
that all vegetation classified as RAFFS are not affected by development. As the project site already
contains approximately 10.6 acres of disturbed or ornamental woodland, this alternative would only
involve the development of approximately 10.6 acres. Based on the same residential density as the
proposed project (i.e. 2.4 units per acre), 25 single-family housing units would be constructed.
Although this level of development could eliminate the potential significant unavoidable effects
associated with the loss of RAFFS, this alternative would not meet the objects of the project,
including, but not limited to not being consistent with the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. In addition,
the Planning Commission finds, based on substantial evidence, that it is not economically feasible for
the applicant to construct the required infrastructure as contemplated by the Etiwanda North Specific
Plan while constructing only 25 housing units on the entire property. The Commission specifically
finds the required improvements to roadways, pipelines, water supplies, and other infrastructure
would not be economically feasible with a return on investment of only 25 housing units.
iv) The"Less Intense Development"Alternative is an alternative that attempts to
avoid all significant, unavoidable, adverse long-term air emission impacts. To accomplish this result,
approximately 104 housing units would need to be eliminated. This would result in approximately
255 residential units on the site with an average dwelling unit per acre density of approximately 1.7
units per acre compared with the proposed 2.4 units per acre. This project density is not consistent
with the Etiwanda North Specific Plan and would not meet many of the objectives of the proposed
project.
j. Mitigation measures described in the Mitigation Monitoring Program, will avoid or
substantially lessen the potentially significant environmental effects of the Project. Further, the
environmental, physical, social, economic and other benefits of the Project, as set forth in this
Section and in Exhibit A, which is incorporated herein by this reference, outweigh any unavoidable,
significant, adverse impacts that may occur as a result of the Project, including impacts on seismic
ground shaking, short-term impacts on air quality from construction-related emissions, long-term
impacts on air quality from project emissions, and cumulative aesthetic impacts of the visual
landscape of the San Gabriel Mountains. Therefore, due to overriding benefits of the Project and
because the alternatives identified in the EIR are not feasible, as discussed in paragraph i above,the
Planning Commission hereby finds that any unavoidable impacts of the Project, including the
mitigated but unavoidable impacts from seismic ground shaking, short-term impacts on air quality
from construction-related emissions, long-term impacts on air quality from project emissions, and
cumulative aesthetic impacts of the visual landscape of the San Gabriel Mountains, are acceptable
based on the findings contained herein and in Exhibit "A," which is incorporated herein by this
reference. This determination shall constitute a statement of overriding considerations within the
meaning of CEQA and is based on any one of the following environmental and other benefits of the
Project identified in the Final EIR and the record of the Planning Commission's proceedings:
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-56
SUBTT16072 — RICHLAND PINEHURST, INC.
May 12, 2004
Page 6
i) The project will provide single-family housing units consistentwith the intent of
the City's General Plan and the Etiwanda North Specific Plan.
ii) The project will allow the proposed tentative tract to be annexed into the City
of Rancho Cucamonga so as to allow for development consistent with City standards and long-range
planning for infrastructure and public services.
iii) The project will be generally consistent and compatible with other existing and
proposed uses in the vicinity of the project and the community of Etiwanda in general.
iv) The project will provide needed infrastructure including streets, water and
sewer mains, and Flood control consistent with City and regional plans related to these services not
only for the proposed development but for other projects, residents and property owners in the area.
v) The project will include a design and landscaping that will create an
aesthetically pleasing living environment for the betterment of existing and new residents of the City.
k. The Mitigation Measures in the Final EIR that correspond to the environmental
impacts which may result from the Project are hereby adopted and made a condition of approval of,
or incorporated into, the Richland Pinehurst Project. The Planning Commission also hereby adopts
the"Mitigation Monitoring Plan"attached hereto as Exhibit"B." The Mitigation Monitoring Plan will be
used to monitor compliance with the mitigation measures and conditions that have been adopted or
made a condition of Project approval as set forth in this Section of this Resolution and in Exhibit"B".
I. Pursuant to provisions of the California Public Resources Code Section 21089(b),
this application shall not be operative, vested or final until the Notice of Determination(NOD) is filed
and posted with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino and all
required filing fees assessed pursuant to California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4, together
with any required handling charges, are paid to the County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino. In
the event this application is determined exempt from such filing fees pursuant to the provisions of the
California Fish and Game Code, or the guidelines promulgated thereunder, condition shall be
deemed null and void.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,this
Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and
in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
Planning Division
1) All future applications for Development Review shall be reviewed for
consistency with the approved Tentative Tract Map and provisions of
the associated Development Agreement, along with the design
guidelines of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, including standards for
parkways and streetscape design, slope planting, and neighborhood
monumentation and wall designs.
2) The terrace drain splash walls and the edges of all down drains within
the landscaped slopes shall be lined with river rock cobble to maintain a
native appearance.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-56
SUBTT16072 — RICHLAND PINEHURST, INC.
May 12, 2004
Page 7
3) The applicant shall provide landscaping and irrigation along the
detention basin on the south side of"F" Street.
4) A minimum 3 feet of landscaping is required between the back of
sidewalk and any retaining wall; and a minimum of 5 feet of landscape
setback is required between the back of the sidewalk and any
wall/fence.
5) The applicant shall establish a financial mechanism that would provide
money for the future construction of the Upper Etiwanda Neighborhood
monumentation at both the northeast and northwest comers of Wilson
Avenue and East Avenue, in accordance with the Neighborhood design
theme of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan.
6) Any lot that is designed with a retaining wall at the toe of the rear yard
slope shall be provided with steps so that the homeowner has
appropriate access to the slope area for landscaping and maintenance.
7) Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00461 is approved in conjunction with
Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16072, including all environmental
mitigation pertaining to biological resources as identified herein.
8) The effective date of the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16072
shall be the last to occur of both of the following events: (i) the date
that Development Agreement DRC2002-00156 has taken effect,and(ii)
the date that the annexation of the property into the City has occurred.
Engineering Division
1) A Homeowners Association (HOA) shall be created for the
maintenance of the proposed landscape/slope areas on either side of
the Community Trail within the Fault Zone and any lettered lots in the
interior and exterior to the tract, except forthe Community Trail fencing
and surfaces. Development shall also join Landscape Maintenance
District (LIVID) No. 7, prior to final map recordation.
a) Alternatively, the City will consider creating a new LIVID for the
above-mentioned areas if the developer can provide a design that
can be cost-effectively maintained to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer.
b) If entrances are gated, they shall conform to City design
standards.
2) The Etiwanda Avenue frontage shall be improved as a Secondary
Arterial including curb and gutter, 9500L HPSV streetlights, a parkway
Community Trail with HOA or LIVID landscaping, and traffic striping and
signage, including R26(s) as required.
3) East Avenue shall be improved as follows:
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-56
SUBTT16072 — RICHLAND PINEHURST, INC.
May 12, 2004
Page 8
a) Install Collector Street improvements in the west half of the
project, from Wilson Avenue to the north tract boundary, plus 18
feet of pavement east of the centerline,for a total of 40 feet along
with a 2-foot wide graded shoulder. This would include curb and
gutter, sidewalk or parkway Community Trail with HOA or LIVID
landscaping, 5800L HPSV streetlights, and traffic striping and
signage, including R26(s) as required. Additionally, construct 44
feet of pavement width for the first 200 feet north of Wilson
Avenue, transitioning back to 40 feet. Install an AC berm along
the entire east side length of East Avenue. The developer may
request a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost for
improvements east of the centerline and south of the south tract
boundary, from future development as it occurs on adjacent
properties within the City limits.
b) South of Wilson Avenue, East Avenue should be constructed 36
feet wide to Banyan Street. The developer shall receive credit
against, and reimbursement of costs in excess of, the
Transportation Development Fee for these backbone
improvements, in conformance with City policy.
c) If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement
agreements within six months of the public improvements being
accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement
shall terminate.
4) Wilson Avenue shall be improved as follows:
a) Install full width Divided Secondary Arterial improvements, from
Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue. This would include curb and
gutter, asphalt pavement, a landscaped median, HOA or LIVID
landscaping, curvilinear sidewalk, 9500L HPSV streetlights, and
traffic striping and signage, including R26(s) as required.
b) The developer shall receive credit against, and reimbursement of
costs in excess of, the Transportation Development Fee for the
median curbs and 14 feet of pavement on both sides, in
conformance with City policy. The developer may also request a
reimbursement agreement to recover the cost for improvements
other than the 'backbone," including median landscaping, south
of the centerline and along the Not-A-Part parcel from future
development on adjacent properties. If the developer fails to
submit for said reimbursement agreements within six months of
the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of
the developer to reimbursement shall terminate.
c) The right-of-way will need to be obtained from Metropolitan Water
District(MWD), as well as a permit for improvements to the south
side of Wilson Avenue.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-56
SUBTT16072 — RICHLAND PINEHURST, INC.
May 12, 2004
Page 9
5) Construct parkway Community Trails, per Standard Drawing 1002-A,on
the east side of Etiwanda Avenue north of Street "U" and on the west
side of East Avenue north of Street "N." Provide a drainage facility
along the toe of any landscaped 3:1 (if HOA, 2:1 allowable) slopes
adjacent to the trail surface, so that no surface flows drain overthe trail.
6) Construct an interior Community Trail, per Standard Drawing 1004,
within Lots J and I over the Fault Zone. The trail shall cross Street"A"
at an intersection and be publicly maintained.
7) All publicly maintained landscape/slope areas should incorporate
attractive, low maintenance designs to City public works landscape
standards, including 40 percent hardscape. Slope widths should be
minimized through the use of 30-inch maximum height freestanding
retaining walls and retaining beneath perimeter walls subject to City
Planner approval.
a) LIVID landscaping within the Fault Zone (Lots I and J) and the
65-foot parkway on the south side of Wilson Avenue shall be
designed for minimal maintenance (Xeriscape).
8) Private homeowners (or a HOA) shall maintain interior comer side
yards. If new a LIVID is formed, eliminate Lots C, D, E, F, and N, and
the 5-foot strips that wrap around the comers from Lots L and K. Side
yard slope areas can be reduced through the use of retaining walls, 2:1
slopes, and allowing comer lots to drain toward the side street, with
curbside drain outlets if necessary. Side yard slopes and fencing shall
not infringe on the lines-of-sight for local street intersections.
9) Lot G along the Not-A-Part parcel is not acceptable for public (LIVID)
maintenance. The owner of said parcel should be approached
regarding off-site grading permission, so that the property line can be
located at the top of slope.
10) Construct Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area 3 Master Plan Storm Drain
facilities along the north property line from Etiwanda Avenue to the
Etiwanda Spreading Grounds, including culverts for both Etiwanda and
East Avenues to cross the facility. Standard drainage fees for the site
shall be credited to the cost of permanent master plan facilities, in
accordance with City policy. The developer may request a
reimbursement agreement to recover oversizing costs, in excess of
fees, from future development. If the developer fails to submit for said
reimbursement agreement within six months of the public
improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to
reimbursement shall terminate.
a) If required by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District to
provide an interim detention basin for this facility, Condition
No. 15 shall also apply to this facility.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-56
SUBTT16072 — RICHLAND PINEHURST, INC.
May 12, 2004
Page 10
b) Flood protection facilities shall be completed prior to occupancy
release.
11) Obtain off-site easements, for grading in the SCE easement north of
the proposed channel, prior to grading permit issuance.
12) Install local storm drains to convey development drainage to the
existing Master Plan Storm Drain in Wilson Avenue. Extend the local
storm drain system as far on-site as needed to contain Q25 within tops
of curbs and Q100 within rights-of-way and provide a 10-foot dry lane in
Q10. The cost of local storm drains shall be bome by this development
with no fee credit.
13) Where sump catch basins are used, provide two and intercept Q1oo in
both sump catch basins and their laterals.
14) Interim basins shall have secondary overflow routes to streets without
impacting adjacent lots.
15) Construct interim detention basin(s)for the Wilson Avenue storm drain,
as follows, justified by a final drainage report approved by the City
Engineer:
a) Provide a temporary easement to the City for the lots containing
the basin.
b) An assessment district shall be formed for maintenance of the
detention basin or a maintenance agreement shall be executed to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney
guaranteeing private maintenance of the facility, but providing the
City with the right of access to maintain the facility if private
maintenance is insufficient and allowing the City to assess those
costs to the developer. The said agreement shall include a cash
deposit as security for any maintenance costs the City may incur.
The said agreement shall be recorded to run with the property.
c) Prior to final map recordation, pay an in lieu fee for removal of
interim basin improvements within LIVID areas and their
replacement with landscaping.
d) Basin shall be designed to mitigate developed flows for the entire
area bounded by Wilson, East, and Etiwanda Avenues and the
SCE easement to the north.
e) The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to
recover the proportionate cost of the land and ultimate basin
related facilities (outlet, etc.) from future development using the
basin. If the developer fails to submit said reimbursement
agreement within six months of the public improvements being
accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement
shall terminate.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-56
SUBTT16072 — RICHLAND PINEHURST, INC.
May 12, 2004
Page 11
16) Provide vehicular access to all manholes.
17) If any of the above-mentioned facilities (street, storm drain, etc.) are
constructed by others,the developer will be responsible for reimbursing
their fair share.
18) Provide a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer. Identify applicable Best Management Practices
(BMPs) on the Grading Plan.
19) Maintenance of BMPs identified in the WQMP shall be addressed in the
project CC&Rs.
20) The project applicant shall demonstrate they have received written
approval from Metropolitan Water District for any proposed activities
within Metropolitan's fee property prior to proceeding with the proposed
improvements to Wilson Avenue or proceeding with any other activity
that may infringe upon or impact rights-of-way. Coordination with
Metropolitan and submittal of design plans should be in accordance
with the "Guidelines for Developments in the Area of Facilities, Fee
Properties, and/or easements of the Metropolitan Water District of
Southern California."
Environmental Mitigation
Aesthetics
AES-1: The applicant shall install landscaping and perimeter walls prior to
occupancy for the following phases and locations as shown on the Project
Phasing Plan (Exhibit 3-8):
• Phase 1-Along Wilson and Etiwanda Avenues
• Phase 2-Along Wilson Avenue
• Phase 3-Along Etiwanda Avenue
• Phase 4 Along East Avenue
AES-2: Prior to approval of a landscape plan, the project applicant shall
provide transitions between the developed and natural (unbuilt) environment
through landscaping techniques.
AES-3: Prior to approval of a landscape plan, the project applicant shall
ensure that streetscape design along the roadways adjacent to the project
site create a strong landscaped edge, provides a coherent high-quality
appearance along a particular route, and enhances the image of adjacent
development.
AES-4: The project applicant shall provide for the undergrounding of utility
lines and facilities, wherever feasible, to minimize the unsightly appearance
of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-56
SUBTT16072 — RICHLAND PINEHURST, INC.
May 12, 2004
Page 12
AES-5: Prior to approval of a landscape plan, trees and structures shall be
used to frame and orient such views at key locations, and obstruction of
views should be kept to a minimum along Etiwanda Avenue and East
Avenue.
Air Quality
AQ-1: The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent
(approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board[RWQCB])
daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403.
AQ-2: During construction, all haul routes shall be swept according to a
schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with
vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year
of construction.
AQ-3: Suspend grading operations when wind speeds exceeding 25 mph to
minimize PM 10 emissions from the site during such episodes.
AQ-4: Chemical soil stabilizers(approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)shall be
applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or
more to reduce PM10 emissions.
AQ-5: The Construction contractor shall select the construction equipment
used on-site based on low emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The
construction contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include a
statement that all construction equipment will be tuned to and maintained in
accordance with the manufacturers specifications.
A":The construction contractor shall utilize electric orclean alternative fuel
powered equipment where feasible.
AQ-7: The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading
plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in
use.
AQ-8: The construction contractor shall use low VOC architectural coating
during the construction phase of the project.
AQ-9: During construction of the proposed improvements, temporary traffic
control (e.g., flag person) will be provided during soil transport activities.
Contractor will be advised not to idle trucks on site for more than ten minutes
AQ-10: During construction of the proposed improvements, only low volatility
paints and coatings as defined in SCAQMD Rule 1113 shall be used. All
paints shall be applied using either high volume low pressure (HVLP) spray
equipment or by hand application.
AQ-11: The proposed project will participate in the cost of off-site traffic
signal installation and synchronization through payment of the traffic signal
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-56
SUBTT16072 — RICHLAND PINEHURST, INC.
May 12, 2004
Page 13
fair-share mitigation fee. This fee will be collected and utilized by the City to
install and synchronize traffic lights as needed to prevent congestion of traffic
flow on East Avenue between Banyan Street and the project boundary, and
Etiwanda Avenue between Highland Avenue and the north terminus of
Etiwanda Avenue.
AQ-12: All appliances within the residential units of the project shall be
energy-efficient as defined by SCAQMD.
AQ-13: The project proponent shall contact local transit agencies to
determine bus routing in the project area that can accommodate bus stops at
the project access points and determine locations and feasibility of bus stop
shelters provided at project proponent's expense.
Biological Resources
B-1: Prior to recording of the first final map of the project, the property owner
shall transfer to the County of San Bernardino Special Districts OS-1 or other
qualified conservation entity approved by the City, in fee, at a ratio of 1:1 (or
147.7 acres) of off-site land for permanent open space and habitat
preservation; along with funding in an amount to be mutually agreed upon by
the property owner and the conservation entity, to provide for long-term
maintenance of said land. The preferred location of the off-site land is in the
environment surrounding the North Etiwanda Preserve in the City Sphere of
Influence, other properties may be considered based the review of
appropriate Biological Habitat Assessments and concurrence of the City
Planner.
If the proponent is unable to acquire all or a portion of the offsite mitigation
land, the proponent will deposit the equivalent mitigation cost of$10,000 per
developable acre with City-approved agency, which acquires and maintains
open space. These funds will be used to purchase and manage mitigation
lands.
B-2: To reduce impacts on adjacent offsite habitat during site preparation,
grading and clearing limits shall be staked prior to issuance of the grading
permits. The limits of grading and clearing shall be staked at 50-foot intervals
with suitable indicators such as white PVC(polyvinylchloride) pipe with steel
bases. Construction equipment shall not be operated beyond the grading
and clearing limits, and a restoration program shall be incorporated to restore
any disturbed offsite areas.
B-3: Landscaping adjacent to natural areas offsite shall use native and
drought-tolerant plant species. Such species shall be reflected on Project
landscape plans. The use of species known to be weedy invasives, such as
German ivy (Senecio milkaniodes), periwinkle (Vinca major), or iceplant
(Carpobrotus spp.), shall be prohibited.
B-4: In areas where night lighting may have adverse impacts on sensitive
wildlife habitat, one or more of the following alternatives shall be utilized,
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-56
SUBTT16072 — RICHLAND PINEHURST, INC.
May 12, 2004
Page 14
recognizing the constraints of roadway lighting requirements: (1)low-intensity
street lamps, (2) low-elevation light poles, or(3) shielding of internal silvering
of the globes or external opaque reflectors.
BS: Provide residents of the future development literature pertaining to
sensitive wildlife in the area and provide ways the residents can reduce
effects on the wildlife, including effects pets have on native wildlife. A list of
invasive plants that are commonly planted in landscaping will be included in
this literature and it will be recommended that certain plants be avoided,such
as giant reed (Arundo donax) castor bean (Ricinus communis) and Pampas
grass (Cortaderia selloana). This literature shall be approved by the City of
Rancho Cucamonga and included within the conditions, covenants, and
restrictions (CC&Rs).
13-6: All 213"heritage trees"shall be removed and replaced with native trees
within the proposed development. Replacements have been proposed at a
1:1 ratio.
B-7: Prior to issuance of a grading permit, focused surveys for Plummer's
mariposa lily shall be conducted by a qualified biologist. Surveys shall be
conducted during flowering period (May to July) in all portions of the project
site containing suitable habitat. If present, the number and location(s)will be
documented and the resource agencies will be notified for consultation and
possible collection and relocation.
B-8: A follow-up focus survey for the San Bernardino kangaroo rat shall be
conducted prior to the issuance of grading permits. If this species is
determined to be present onsite, consultation with United States Forestry
Wildlife Service(USFWS) under the Endangered Species Act shall occur and
USFWS-approved mitigation measures shall be implemented.
13-9:A follow-up focused survey shall be conducted to confirm the absence of
the coastal California gnatcatcher. Special focus will be placed in the
northwest comer of the project site, which was not previously surveyed. If
this species is determined to be present onsite, consultation with USFWS
under the Endangered Species Act shall occur and USFWS-approved
mitigation measures shall be implemented.
B-10: The project proponent will have a qualified biological monitor present
during initial brush clearing to reduce mortality to sensitive species,
specifically sensitive rodent species, as well as incidental species.
B-11: If grading activities are to occur during active nesting season(generally
February 15 -August 31), a field survey shall be conducted by a qualified
biologist to determine if active nests covered by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act
and/or the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) Code are
present. If active nests are present, the area will be flagged, along with a
100-foot buffer (300-feet for raptors) and will be avoided until the nesting
cycle is complete.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-56
SUBTT16072 — RICHLAND PINEHURST, INC.
May 12, 2004
Page 15
B-12: The project proponent shall obtain a Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and a 1603 Streambed
Alteration Permit from California Department of Fish and Game prior to
grading or any other groundbreaking activities, and shall comply with the
permit's mitigation requirements.
Cultural Resources
CR-1: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall
retain a City-approved archaeologist to develop an archaeological mitigation
plan and a discovery clause/treatment plan. Both of these plans shall be
reviewed and approved by the City. The archaeological mitigation plan shall
include monitoring 50 percent of the excavation activities on the project site
by a City-approved archaeologist and/or their representative. The discovery
clause/treatment plan shall include recovery and subsequent treatment of any
archaeological or historical remains and associated data uncovered by
brushing, grubbing, or excavation. The treatment plan shall provide
procedures for the curation of any detected cultural specimens. Any
recovered cultural resources shall be identified, sites recorded, mapped and
artifacts catalogued as required by standard professional archaeological
practices. Examination by an archaeological specialist shall be included
where necessary, dependent upon the artifacts, features, or sites that are
encountered. Specialists will identify, date and/or determine significance
potential.
CR-2: If the archaeological monitor discovers cultural deposits, earthmoving
shall be diverted temporarily around the deposits until the deposits have been
evaluated, recorded, excavated, and/or recovered, as necessary, and in
accordance with a City-approved recovery plan. Earthmoving shall be
allowed to proceed through the area after the archaeologist determines the
artifacts are recovered and/or site mitigated to the extent necessary.
CR-3: If a previously unknown cultural site is encountered during monitoring
and it is determined by the archaeologist that a significance determination is
required, the site shall be evaluated and recorded in accordance with
requirements of the State Office of Historic Preservation (i.e., DPR 523 form).
In this case, if the site is not determined to be significant, no measures
subsequent to recording the site on appropriate forms are required. If any of
the sites are determined to be significant, an adequate amount of artifacts at
the specific archaeological site shall be collected by the City-approved
archaeologist. The archaeologist shall determine the amount of artifacts
needed to be collected.
CR-4: If human remains are encountered during excavations associated with
this project, all work shall halt and the County Coroner shall be notified
(Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code). The Coronerwill determine
whether the remains are of forensic interest. If the coroner, with the aid of
the City-approved archaeologist, determines that the remains are prehistoric,
he/she will contact the Native American Heritage Commission(NAHC). The
NAHC will be responsible for designating the most likely descendant(MLD),
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-56
SUBTT16072 — RICHLAND PINEHURST, INC.
May 12, 2004
Page 16
who will be responsible for the ultimate disposition of the remains, as
required by Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. The
MLD will make his/her recommendations within 24 hours of their notification
by the NAHC. This recommendation may include scientific removal and
nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native
American burials (Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code).
CR-5: Any recovered archaeological resources shall be identified, sites
recorded, mapped and artifacts catalogued as required by standard
archaeological practices. Examination by an archaeological specialist should
be included where necessary, dependent upon the artifacts, features or sites
that are encountered. Specialists will identify, date and/or determine
significance potential.
CR-6: A final report of findings will be prepared by the City-approved
archaeologist for submission to the City, project applicant, and the
Archaeological Information Center of the San Bernardino County Museum.
The report will describe the history of the project area, summarize field and
laboratory methods used, if applicable, and include any testing or special
analysis information conducted to support the resultant findings.
CR-7: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall
retain a City-approved paleontologist. The City-approved paleontologist shall
monitor all excavation activities in areas of the project underlain by previously
undisturbed sediments. Earthmoving in areas of the site where previously
undisturbed sediments will be buried but not disturbed will not be monitored.
Monitoring shall begin once earthmoving reaches five (5) feet below the
original ground surface.
CR-8: Monitoring shall be conducted on a full-time basis in areas of the
project underlain by sensitive rock units associated with older alluvium being
encountered by earthmoving.
CR-9: Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert
earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage.
If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should
immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. If too few
fossil remains are found after 50 percent of earthmoving has been
completed, monitoring can be reduced or discontinued in those areas at the
project paleontologist's direction.
CR-10: If paleontological resources are detected. Prepare, identify, and
curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and
transfer to an appropriate depository(i.e., San Bernardino County Museum).
CR-11: A final report of findings will be prepared by the City-approved
paleontologist for submission to the City, project applicant, and the San
Bernardino County Museum. All collected specimens and the final report
shall be provided to the San Bernardino County Museum.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-56
SUBTT16072 — RICHLAND PINEHURST, INC.
May 12, 2004
Page 17
Geology And Soils
GS-1: Prior to issuance of a building permit for structures adjacent to the
Etiwanda Avenue Scarp thrust fault on the project site, all structures north of
this fault shall be set back 100 feet from the faulted zone and all structures
south of this fault shall be set back 50 feet from the fault zone.
GS-2: Prior to the issuance of a building permit, structures will be designed
and constructed in accordance with the Uniform Building Code and general
engineering standards for seismic safety for development within Seismic
Zone 4.
GS-3: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, engineered slopes of the
project site shall be designed in accordance with the Uniform Building Code
to resist seismically induced failures. Slope design shall be based on
pseudo-static stability analyses using soil-engineering parameters established
for the site.
GS-4: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the grading plans shall state
that the loose, cohesionless soils located on the surface of the site shall be
removed and recompacted during grading operations.
GS-5: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the grading plans shall state
that the native surficial and artificial fills on the project site that are of low
density, shall be removed and recompacted or exported offsite.
GS-6: Prior to the issuance of a final grading approval, potentially unstable
graded slopes that exceed approximately 15 feet in height will require
additional stabilization measures such as buttressing cut slopes with
compacted fill, adding geogrid reinforcement to fill slopes, using a higher
compaction standard, and/or using retaining walls.
GS-7: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the grading plans shall state
that potentially compressible soils that are located on the project site shall be
removed and recompacted in accordance with standard grading procedures.
GS-8: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the project's soil engineer
shall identify the method(s)of eliminating the potential for collapsible soils on
the grading plan. Potential methods include excavation and recompaction
and presaturation and pre-loading of the susceptible soils in-place to induce
collapse prior to construction. After construction, infiltration of water into the
subsurface soils shall be minimized by proper surface drainage which directs
excess runoff from the proposed slopes and structures.
GS-9: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the grading plans shall state
that during grading operations, the soil engineer shall be consulted to
relocate oversize rocks on the project site to reduce the potential deficiency
of fill materials that could result from the removal of oversize rocks on the
project site.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-56
SUBTT16072 — RICHLAND PINEHURST, INC.
May 12, 2004
Page 18
Noise
N-1: During all project site excavation and grading, the project contractors
shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile,with properly operating
and maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturers standards.
N-2: When construction operations occur in close proximity to occupied
residential areas, appropriate additional noise reduction measures shall be
implemented, including: changing the location of stationary construction
equipment to maximize the distance between stationary equipment and
occupied residential areas, installing muffling devices on equipment,shutting
off idling equipment, notifying adjacent residences in advance of construction,
and installing temporary acoustic barriers around stationary construction
noise sources.
N-3: The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that
will create the greatest distance between construction related noise and the
noise-sensitive receptors nearest . the project site during all project
construction.
N-4: During all project site construction, the construction contract shall limit all
construction related activities that would result in high noise levels to between
the hours of 6:30 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday. No
construction shall be allowed on Sundays and public holidays.
NS: The project applicant shall construct sound barriers adjacent to the
project lots as shown in Exhibit 5.5-2. The heights of the sound barriers shall
be between 3 and 6.5 feet and placed at the top of the proposed slope and at
the edge of pads on the residential lots that border Etiwanda Avenue,Wilson
Avenue, and East Avenue. The sound barriers may be constructed of
earthen berms, masonry, wood, or other similar materials, or combination of
these materials to attain the total height required. These sound barriers shall
be solid, with no openings from the ground to the indicated height.
N-6: Prior to the issuance of a building permit, residential structures proposed
on all lots adjacent to Etiwanda Avenue, Wilson Avenue, and East Avenue
will require mechanical ventilation so that windows can remain closed.
Furthermore, these residential lots will require upgraded windows such as
double-pane windows, if these lots have second story structures. To ensure
the specific type of mechanical ventilation and paned windows are included in
the building plans, a final acoustical study shall be prepared for City approval
prior to approval of Development Review applications for product
development. The final acoustical study shall identify the specific
requirements to reduce future interior noise levels to 45 dB CNEL or less.
Public Services And Utilities
F-1: Prior to the issuance building permits, the project applicant shall obtain
approval from Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) of the designs
for the fire flow and proposed fire resistant structural materials.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-56
SUBTT16072 — RICHLAND PINEHURST, INC.
May 12, 2004
Page 19
W-1: Prior to the issuance of building permits, the project applicant will be
required to submit a water services development fee to ensure that adequate
water supplies and facilities are available to meet the project demand.
W-2: Prior to the issuance of a building permit for each phase, the project
applicant shall submit a landscaping and irrigation plan for common areas to
the City for approval. Landscaping and irrigation within common areas shall
be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined
in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code.
WW-1: Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, the applicant shall provide
funding to the Cucamonga County Water Agency for sewer service.
S-1: Prior to the issuance of building permits, the project applicant shall pay
developer impact fees to the Etiwanda School District and Chaffey Joint
Union High School District in accordance with Section 65995 of the
Government Code for the proposed residences.
Transportation/Traffic
TT-1: The project applicant shall contribute its fair share toward local off-site
traffic improvements. On-site improvements will be required in conjunction
with the phasing of the proposed development to ensure adequate circulation
within the project itself. The fair share contribution of all off-site
improvements and timing of all onsite traffic improvements shall be subject to
an agreement with the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This agreement shall be
in place prior to tract map approval.
TT-2: The project applicant shall update construction cost estimates and
prepare a current cost of the project's fair share contribution toward traffic
improvements.
TT-3: The project applicant shall construct Wilson Avenue from Etiwanda
Avenue to East Avenue as a Special Divided Secondary Arterial (165 ft.
Right-of-way) in conjunction with development of the proposed project or as
determined by the Development Agreement with the City.
TT-4: The project applicant shall construct the extension of East Avenue from
the south project boundary with a minimum 36-foot two-way paved access to
the project in conjunction with development of the proposed project or as
determined by the Development Agreement with the City.
TT-5: The project applicant shall construct East Avenue from the north
project boundary to Wilson Avenue to provide 44-foot two-way paved access
and the full shoulder(curb, gutter, street lights, and side walks)on west side
of the street in conjunction with development of the proposed project or as
determined by the Development Agreement with the City.
TT-6: The project applicant shall construct Etiwanda Avenue from the north
project boundary to Golden Prairie Drive at its ultimate half-section width as a
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-56
SUBTT16072 — RICHLAND PINEHURST, INC.
May 12, 2004
Page 20
Secondary Arterial (96 ft. Right-of-way) in conjunction with development of
the proposed project or as determined by the Development Agreement with
the City.
TT-7: Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide funds
in accordance with the City's Transportation Development Fee. Collection-of
these fees shall represent the project's "fair-share" toward the following
transportation improvements required for opening year(Year 2004):
• Installation of a traffic signal at Etiwanda Avenue at Banyan Street.
• Installation of a traffic signal at East Avenue at Banyan Street.
• Construction of a southbound right tum lane at the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue
at Highland Avenue.
TT-8: Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide
funds in accordance with the City's Transportation Development Fee.
Collection of these fees shall represent the project's "fair share" toward the
following transportation improvements required for Buildout Year 2020.
• Construction of one additional northbound lane to provide a shared left and through
lane, and a shared right and through northbound lane, and one additional
southbound lane to provide a shared left and through and a shared right and
through southbound lane on East Avenue at Banyan Street.
• Construction of a westbound through lane on Highland Avenue at Etiwanda
Avenue.
• Installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue (North) at
Wilson Avenue.
• Installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue (South) at
Wilson Avenue.
• Installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of East Avenue at Wilson Avenue.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF MAY 2004.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: U/ J
arty T. iel, Vice Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Bu ecreta
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 05-56
SUBTT16072 — RICHLAND PINEHURST, INC.
May 12, 2004
Page 21
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 12th day of May 2004, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, McNIEL, McPHAIL, STEWART
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: STEWART
FINDINGS OF FACT IN SUPPORT OF FINDINGS FOR SIGNIFICANT
ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP NUMBER 16072 PROJECT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING
CONSIDERATIONS
May 12,2004
INTRODUCTION
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Public Resources Code Section 21081, and the
CEQA Guidelines Section 15091 provide that:
"No public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an environmental impact
report has been certified which identifies one or more significant effects on the
environment that would occur if the project is approved or carried out unless the public
agency makes one or more of the following findings:
a. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which
mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment.
b. Those changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another
public agency and have been, or can and should be, adopted by that other agency.
C. Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation
measures or project alternatives identified in the final environmental impact report."
Because the Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map Number 16072 project Environmental Impact
Report (EIR) identified significant effects that may occur as a result of the project, and in accordance
with the provisions of CEQA and CEQA Guidelines, the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby adopts
these findings as part of the approval of the Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map Number 16072
project and related applications.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared an EIR for the project in accordance with CEQA and
CEQA Guideline requirements. The EIR was subject to review and approval by the Rancho
Cucamonga Planning Commission. At a public hearing held on May 12, 2004, the EIR was certified
as adequate in accordance with CEQA procedures.
After adopting this Statement of Findings of Fact, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council can approve
the Tentative Tract Map Number 16072 project. All subsequent, grading permits, mitigation
implementation, and regulatory agreements and permits will be reviewed based on the documentation
in the EIR.
MITIGATED ADVERSE IMPACTS
The potential significant adverse impacts that would be mitigated are listed in the following sections.
The Rancho Cucamonga City Council finds that these potential adverse impacts would be mitigated to
a level that is considered less than significant after implementation of the project design features and
recommended mitigation measures.
EXHIBIT "A"
Tentative Tact SUBTTI6072/Richland Pinehurst,Inc. 1 Findings
GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Seismic Hazards
Fault-Induced Ground Rupture
Significant Impact
Development of the proposed project will result in the potential for fault-induced ground rupture at the
project site.
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid
the significant effects on the environment.
Facts in Support of Finding
The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than
significant by virtue of project design features and the following mitigation measures as identified in
the final EIR and incorporated into the project.
Prior to issuance of a building permit for structures adjacent to the Etiwanda Avenue Scarp
thrust fault on the project site, all structures north of this fault shall be set back 100 feet from
the faulted zone and all structures south of this fault shall be set back 50 feet from the fault
zone.
Seismically-Induced Slope Instability
Significant Impact
Development of the proposed project including the interim detention basins will include graded slopes
of up to 40 feet in height and gradients of 3:1 or less. Strong ground motions could induce slope
instability.
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid
the significant effects on the environment.
Facts in Support of Finding
The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than
significant by virtue of project design features and the following mitigation measures as identified in
the final EIR and incorporated into the project.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, engineered slopes of the project site shall be
designed in accordance with the Uniform Building Code to resist seismically induced failures.
Slope design shall be based on pseudo-static stability analyses using soil-engineering
parameters established for the site.
Tentative Tract$UBM6072/Richland Pinehurst,Inc. 2 Findings
Ground Lurching
Significant Impact
Colluvial soils and loose cohesionless soils are present at the surface of the project site. Ground
lurching due to seismic shaking could result in impacts to structures.
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid
the significant effects on the environment.
Facts in Support of Finding
The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than
significant by virtue of project design features and the following mitigation measures as identified in
the final EIR and incorporated into the project.
• Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the grading plans shall state that the loose,
cohesionless soils located on the surface of the site shall be removed and recompacted during
grading operations.
Seismically-Induced Settlement
Significant Impact
Strong ground shaking can cause settlement by allowing greater compaction of the soil particles.
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid
the significant effects on the environment.
Facts in Support of Finding
The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than
significant by virtue of project design features and the following mitigation measures as identified in
the final EIR and incorporated into the project.
• Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the grading plans shall state that the native surficial
and artificial fills on the project site that are of low density, shall be removed and recompacted
or exported offsite.
Slope Stability
Significant Impact
Implementation of the proposed project would result in slopes at 40 feet in height.
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid
the significant effects on the environment.
Tentative Tract SUBTr16072/Richland Pinehurst,Inc. 3 Findings
Facts in Support of Finding
The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than
significant by virtue of project design features and the following mitigation measures as identified in
the final EIR and incorporated into the project.
• Prior to the issuance of a final grading approval,potentially unstable graded slopes that exceed
approximately 15 feet in height will require additional stabilization measures such as
buttressing cut slopes with compacted,fill, adding geogrid reinforcement to fill slopes, using a
higher compaction standard, and/or using retaining walls.
Foundation Stability
Compressible Soils
Significant Impact
The upper few feet of the native soil onsite is potentially compressible. Uncontrolled fills that exist on
the project site due to old road fills and backfills from exploratory trenches are also compressible.
These materials are of low density and would settle under the weight of the proposed fills and
structures.
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid
the significant effects on the environment.
Facts in Support of Finding
The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than
significant by virtue of project design features and the following mitigation measures as identified in
the final EIR and incorporated into the project.
• Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the grading plans shall state that potentially
compressible soils that are located on the project site shall be removed and recompacted in
accordance with standard grading procedures.
Collapsible Soils
Significant Impact
Due to the potential for variation in grain size within the alluvial fan deposits located on the project
site, localized areas could result in potential collapse of soil material.
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid
the significant effects on the environment.
Facts in Support of Finding
The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than
significant by virtue of project design features and the following mitigation measures as identified in
the final EIR and incorporated into the project.
Tentative Tact SUBTT16072/Rich]and Pinehurst,Inc. 4 Findings
• Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the project's soil engineer shall identify the
method(s) of eliminating the potential for collapsible soils on the grading plan. Potential
methods include excavation and recompaction and presaturation and pre-loading of the
susceptible soils in-place to induce collapse prior to construction. After construction,
infiltration of water into the subsurface soils shall be minimized by proper surface drainage
which directs excess runoff from the proposed slopes and structures.
Rippability and Oversize Rock
Significant Impact
Because there is no bedrock at or within hundreds of feet from the surface, rippability of the onsite
soils is less than significant. However, due to the presence of large cobbles and boulders in the onsite
alluvium, special handling of oversize rocks will be required. The removal of boulders from the site
could result in deficiencies of fill material in the proposed balanced cut and fill grading design.
Therefore, the presence of oversize rock could result in a potential significant impact.
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid
the significant effects on the environment.
Facts in Support of Finding
The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than
significant by virtue of project design features and the following mitigation measures as identified in
the final EIR and incorporated into the project.
• Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the grading plans shall state that during grading
operations, the soil engineer shall be consulted to relocate oversize rocks on the project site to
reduce the potential deficiency of fill materials that could result from the removal of oversize
rocks on the project site.
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Natural Communities
Significant Impact
The proposed project will result in the loss of 147.7 acres of RAFSS. RAFSS is considered sensitive
by the California Department of Fish and Game and loss of this plant community is considered
significant. o
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid
the significant effects on the environment.
Facts in Support of Finding
The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than
significant by virtue of project design features and the following mitigation measures as identified in
the final.EIR and incorporated into the project.
Tentative Tract SUBTT16072/Richland Pinehurst,Inc. 5 Findings
• The project proponent will acquire and convey to the County of San Bernardino at a ratio of
1:1 (or 147.7 acres) of land within or near the North Etiwanda Open Space and Habitat
Preservation Program(NEOSHPP) that supports similar RAFSS habitat. This measure will
mitigate the loss of habitat that may support sensitive plants and animals as well as raptor
foraging habitat. The quality of offsite mitigation land may affect the total acres needing to be
acquired. If the offsite mitigation area contains a higher quality habitat, less land may need to
be acquired, likewise, if a lower quality habitat is acquired,more land may need to be set aside
as mitigation.
If the proponent is unable to acquire all or a portion of the offsite mitigation land, the
proponent will deposit the equivalent mitigation cost of $10,000 per developable acre with
City-approved agency, which acquires and maintains open space. These funds will be used to
purchase and manage mitigation lands.
• To reduce impacts on adjacent offsite habitat during site preparation, grading and clearing
limits shall be staked prior to issuance of the grading permits. The limits of grading and
clearing shall be staked at 50-foot intervals with suitable indicators such as white PVC
(polyvinylchloride) pipe with steel bases. Construction equipment shall not be operated
beyond the grading and clearing limits, and a restoration program shall be incorporated to
restore any disturbed offsite areas.
• Landscaping adjacent to natural areas offsite shall use native and drought-tolerant plant
species. Such species shall be reflected on Project landscape plans. The use of species known
to be weedy invasives, such as German ivy (Senecio milkaniodes), periwinkle (Vinca major),
or iceplant(Carpobrotus spp.), shall be prohibited.
• In areas where night lighting may have adverse impacts on sensitive wildlife habitat, one or
more of the following alternatives shall be utilized, recognizing the constraints of roadway
lighting requirements: (1) low-intensity street lamps, (2) low-elevation light poles, or (3)
shielding of internal silvering of the globes or external opaque reflectors.
• Provide residents of the future development literature pertaining to sensitive wildlife in the
area and provide ways the residents can reduce effects on the wildlife, including effects pets
have on native wildlife. A list of invasive plants that are commonly planted in landscaping
will be included in this literature and it will be recommended that certain plants be avoided,
such as giant reed (Arundo donax) castor bean (Ricinus communis) and Pampas grass
(Cortaderia selloana). This literature shall be approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and
included within the conditions, covenants, and restrictions (CC&Rs).
Common Plant Species G
Significant Impact
The City of Rancho Cucamonga has a local tree preservation ordinance that requires a City permit to
remove any tree over 15 feet high and 15 inches in circumference. A total of 213 trees meet the City's
"heritage tree" criteria. Approximately 175 eucalyptus trees, 11 ornamental trees, 14 pepper trees, 9
southern California black walnut trees, and 4 western sycamore trees occur on-site. All trees within
the project boundary were assessed as being of fair to poor condition physiologically, structurally, and
aesthetically.
Tentative Tract SUBM6072/Richland Pinehurst,Inc. 6 Findings
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid
the significant effects on the environment.
Facts in Support of Finding
The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than
significant by virtue of project design features and the following mitigation measures as identified in
the final EIR and incorporated into the project.
• All 213 "heritage trees" shall be removed and replaced with native trees within the proposed
development. Replacements have been proposed at a 1:1 ratio.
Sensitive Plant Species
Significant Impact
Fifteen sensitive plant species have been identified as occurring within the general vicinity of the
project site. Thirteen of these plants are listed as sensitive (List IB) by the CNPS and are considered
sensitive by CDFG. However, only Plummer's mariposa lilies were observed during field inventories.
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid
the significant effects on the environment.
Facts in Support of Finding
The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than
significant by virtue of project design features and the following mitigation measures as identified in
the final EIR and incorporated into the project.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit, focused surveys for Plummer's mariposa lily shall be
conducted by a qualified biologist. Surveys shall be conducted during flowering period (May
to July) in all portions of the project site containing suitable habitat. If present, the number
and location(s) will be documented and the resource agencies will be notified for consultation
and possible collection and relocation.
Sensitive Wildlife Species
Coastal California Gnatcatcher
Potentially Significant Impact
The project site is within the known range and within designated Critical Habitat of the federally listed
threatened coastal California gnatcatcher. Although the protocol surveys conducted in both 2001and
2002 were negative, 6 recent sightings have been documented within the immediate vicinity. Because
the project site supports suitable habitat for this species, and the recent sighting on adjacent lands the
potential for this species to use the project site is still considered high. Therefore, the loss or
fragmentation of potential coastal California gnatcatcher habitat is considered significant.
Tentative Tract SUBTT16072/Richland Pinehurst,Inc. 7 Findings
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid
the significant effects on the environment.
Facts in Support of Finding
The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than
significant by virtue of project design features and the following mitigation measures as identified in
the final EIR and incorporated into the project.
• A follow-up focused survey shall be conducted to confirm the absence of the coastal
California gnatcatcher. Special focus will be placed in the northwest corner of the project site,
which was not previously surveyed. If this species is determined to be present onsite,
consultation with USFWS under the Endangered Species Act shall occur and USFWS-
approved mitigation measures shall be implemented.
Other Rodents
Significant Impact
Three species of rodents that were detected on the property are considered Species of Concern by
CDFG. The three species present within the RAFSS habitat, include the Northwestern San Diego
pocket mouse, San Diego desert woodrat, and the Los Angeles little pocket mouse. Because these
three species are present onsite, the impacts to the habitat is considered significant.
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid
the significant effects on the environment.
Facts in Support of Finding
The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than
significant by virtue of project design features and the following mitigation measures as identified in
the final EIR and incorporated into the project.
• The project proponent will have a qualified biological monitor present during initial brush
clearing to reduce mortality to sensitive species, specifically sensitive rodent species, as well
as incidental species.
Jurisdictional Areas
Significant Impact
A jurisdictional delineation was conducted by PCR on the project site on September 8, 2001
(Appendix C of the Draft EIR). Subsequent field surveys were also conducted by PCR in 2002. The
survey revealed that there are three drainages found on the property that are considered under the
jurisdiction of USACE and CDFG. Impacts to USACE areas would result in the removal of 1.13 acres
of"waters of the U.S.", and no loss of wetlands. Total area of jurisdiction under the CDFG would
also be approximately 1.13 acres.
Tentative Tract SUBM 6072/Richland Pinehurst,Inc. 8 Findings
Jurisdictional determinations were also made for off-site portions of these drainages to the extent that
they may be impacted by the proposed project. Drainages measured adjacent to the site include
approximately 4,342 linear feet and 0.98 acre of ACOE and CDFG jurisdictional streambed. None of
these off-site areas meet the ACOE definition of a jurisdiction wetland. The proposed project would
result in the loss of jurisdictional areas, both on and off site, of 2.01 acres of"waters of the U.S." and
no loss of wetlands. Compliance with the mitigations that are required through the 404 process would
reduce impacts to less than significant.
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid
the significant effects on the environment.
Facts in Support of Finding
The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than
significant by virtue of project design features and the following mitigation measures as identified in
the final EIR and incorporated into the project.
• The project proponent shall obtain a Section 404 of the Clean Water Act permit from the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers and a 1603 Streambed Alteration Permit from California
Department of Fish and Game prior to grading or any other groundbreaking activities, and
shall comply with the permit's mitigation requirements.
TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION
Trip Generation
Opening Year(Year 1004)
Significant Impact
The traffic generation for this project has been estimated, based upon the specific land use that has
been planned for the proposed development. The proposed project consists of 358 single-family
dwelling units. The proposed development is projected to generate approximately 3,436 daily trips.
The following intersections would operate at an LOS F in the AM peak hour without and with the
project.
• Etiwanda Avenue at Banyan Street
• Etiwanda Avenue at Highland Avenue
• East Avenue at Banyan Street
Although the project would not change the level of service, the contribution of project traffic to these
three intersections during the AM peak hour represent a significant traffic impact.
Without project traffic, all intersections would operate at LOS D or better during the PM peak hour
which represents a less than significant impact. Except for the following intersection, all study area
intersections operate at LOS D or better with the project during the PM peak hour.
Tentative Tract SUBTT16072/Richland Pinehurst,Inc. 9 Findings
• Etiwanda Avenue at Banyan Avenue
The intersection of Etiwanda Avenue at Banyan Avenue will operate at LOS E with the project which
exceeds the City's standard and is considered a significant impact.
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid
the significant effects on the environment.
Facts in Support of Finding
The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than
significant by virtue of project design features and the following mitigation measures as identified in
the final EIR and incorporated into the project.
• The project applicant shall contribute its fair share toward local off-site traffic improvements.
On-site improvements will be required in conjunction with the phasing of the proposed
development to ensure adequate circulation within the project itself. The fair share
contribution of all off-site improvements and timing of all onsite traffic improvements shall be
subject to an agreement with the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This agreement shall be in
place prior to tract map approval.
• The project applicant shall update construction cost estimates and prepare a current cost of the
project's fair share contribution toward traffic improvements.
• The project applicant shall construct Wilson Avenue from Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue
as a Special Divided Secondary Arterial (165 ft. Right-of-way) in conjunction with
development of the proposed project or as determined by the Development Agreement with
the City.
• The project applicant shall construct the extension of East Avenue from the south project
boundary with a minimum 36-foot two-way paved access to the project in conjunction with
development of the proposed project or as determined by the Development Agreement with
the City.
• The project applicant shall construct East Avenue from the north project boundary to Wilson
Avenue to provide 44-foot two-way paved access and the full shoulder (curb, gutter, street
lights, and side walks) on west side of the street in conjunction with development of the
proposed project or as determined by the Development Agreement with the City.
• The project applicant shall construct Etiwanda Avenue from the north project boundary to
Golden Prairie Drive at its ultimate half-section width as a Secondary Arterial (96 ft. Right-of-
way) in conjunction with development of the proposed project or as determined by the
Development Agreement with the City.
Buildout Year 2020
Significant Impact
Table 5.3-6 depicts the level of service at the study area intersections at buildout year(Year 2020)
without and with the project. Table 5.3-6 shows the following intersections would operate at an LOS F
in the AM peak hour without and with the project.
Tentative Tract SUBTTI 6072/Richland Pinehurst,Inc. 10 Findings
• Etiwanda Avenue at Banyan Street
• Etiwanda Avenue at Highland Avenue
• East Avenue at Wilson
• East Avenue at Banyan Street
The project traffic contributed to these four study area intersections during the AM peak hour
represent a significant traffic impact. Except for the following intersections, all study area intersections
operate at LOS D or better during the PM peak hour without the project.
• Etiwanda Avenue(South)at Wilson Avenue
• Etiwanda Avenue at Banyan Street
• East Avenue at Banyan Street
These three intersections would operate at LOS F which exceeds the City's standard and is considered
a significant impact. Except for the following intersections, all study area intersections would operate
at LOS D or better during the PM peak hour with the project.
• Etiwanda Avenue (South) at Wilson Avenue
• Etiwanda Avenue at Banyan Street
• East Avenue at Wilson Avenue
• East Avenue at Banyan Street
These four intersections would operate at LOS F which exceeds the City's standard and is considered
a significant impact.
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid
the significant effects on the environment.
Facts in Support of Finding
The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than
significant by virtue of project design features and the following mitigation measures as identified in
the final EIR and incorporated into the project.
• Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide funds in accordance with the
City's Transportation Development Fee. Collection of these fees shall represent the project's
"fair-share"toward the following transportation improvements required for opening year
(Year 2004):
• Installation of a traffic signal at Etiwanda Avenue at Banyan Street.
• Installation of a traffic signal at East Avenue at Banyan Street.
• Construction of a southbound right turn lane at the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue at
Highland Avenue.
• Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall provide funds in accordance with
the City's Transportation Development Fee. Collection of these fees shall represent the
project's "fair share"toward the following transportation improvements required for Buildout
Year 2020.
Tentative Tract SUBTT16072/Richland Pinehurst,Inc. 11 Findings
• Construction of one additional northbound lane to provide a shared left and through
lane, and a shared right and through northbound lane on East Avenue at Banyon Street
• Construction of one additional southbound lane to provide a shared left and through
and a shared right and through southbound lane on East Avenue at Banyon Street.
• Construction of a westbound through lane on Highland Avenue at Etiwanda Avenue.
• Installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue (North) at
Wilson Avenue.
• Add an eastbound and westbound left turn lane and install a traffic signal at the
intersection of Etiwanda Avenue(South)at Wilson Avenue.
• Installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of East Avenue at Wilson Avenue.
NOISE
Long-Term Operational Impacts
Onsite Impacts
Significant Impact
An impact may be significant if the project sites a land use (i.e., residential) in an incompatible area
due to excessive noise. The City has set a desirable daytime level of 60 dBA CNEL for residences.
Based on the future (Buildout Year 2020) traffic volumes identified in Section 5.3, noise levels were
calculated along the existing and future streets adjacent to the project site. These streets include
Etiwanda Avenue, Wilson Avenue, and East Avenue. All of the residences proposed on the perimeter
of the project site will be exposed to future year 2020 vehicular noise that range between 64.3 to 68.4
dBA CNEL. These future noise levels would result in significant noise impacts to the residences
proposed on the perimeter of the site and adjacent to Etiwanda Avenue, Wilson Avenue, and East
Avenue.
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid
the significant effects on the environment.
Facts in Support of Finding
The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than
significant by virtue of project design features and the following mitigation measures as identified in
the final EIR and incorporated into the project.
• The project applicant shall construct sound barriers adjacent to the project lots as shown in
Exhibit 5.5-2 in the Draft EIR. The heights of the sound barriers shall be between 3 and 6.5
feet and placed at the top of the proposed slope and at the edge of pads on the residential lots
that border Etiwanda Avenue, Wilson Avenue, and East Avenue. The sound barriers may be
constructed of earthen berms, masonry, wood, or other similar materials, or combination of
these materials to attain the total height required. These sound barriers shall be solid, with no
openings from the ground to the indicated height.
• Prior to the issuance of a building permit, residential structures proposed on all lots adjacent to
Etiwanda Avenue, Wilson Avenue, and East Avenue will require mechanical ventilation so
that windows can remain closed. Furthermore, these residential lots will require upgraded
windows such as double-pane windows, if these lots have second story structures. To ensure
the specific type of mechanical ventilation and paned windows are included in the building
Tentative Tract SUBTTI6072/Richland Pinehurst,Inc. 12 Findings
plans, a final acoustical study shall be prepared for City approval prior to approval of
Development Review applications for product development. The final acoustical study shall
identify the specific requirements to reduce future interior noise levels to 45 dB CNEL or less.
AESTHETICS
Significant Impact
Implementation of the proposed residential community will substantially alter the existing character of
the project site as well as views of the San Gabriel Mountains.
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid
the significant effects on the environment.
Facts in Support of Finding
The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than
significant by virtue of project design features and the following mitigation measures as identified in
the final EIR and incorporated into the project.
• The applicant shall install landscaping and perimeter walls prior to issuance of building
permits for the following phases and locations as shown on the Project Phasing Plan(Exhibit
3-8 in the Draft EIR):
• Phase 1-Along Wilson and Etiwanda Avenues.
• Phase 2-Along Wilson Avenue
• Phase 3-Along Etiwanda Avenue
• Phase 4 Along East Avenue
• Prior to approval of a landscape plan, the project applicant shall provide transitions between
the developed and natural (unbuilt) environment through landscaping techniques
• Prior to approval of a landscape plan, the project applicant shall ensure that streetscape design
along the roadways adjacent to the project site create a strong landscaped edge, provides a
coherent high-quality appearance along a particular route, and enhances the image of adjacent
development.
• The project applicant shall provide for the undergrounding of utility lines and facilities,
wherever feasible, to minimize the unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility
enclosures.
• Prior to approval of a landscape plan, trees and structures shall be used to frame and orient
such views at key locations, and obstruction of views should be kept to a minimum along
Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue.
Tentative Tract SUBTT 1 6072/Richland Pinehurst,Inc. 13 Findings
CULTURAL RESOURCES
Archeological/Historical Resources
Potentially Significant Impact
The results of the records search indicated that three archeological sites are within the project area,
including the new site located during the site visit. It is also likely that prehistoric remains may still be
buried.
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid
the significant effects on the environment.
Facts in Support of Finding
The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than
significant by virtue of project design features and the following mitigation measures as identified in
the final EIR and incorporated into the project.
• Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall retain a City-approved
archaeologist to develop an archaeological mitigation plan and a discovery clause/treatment
plan. Both of these plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City. The archaeological
mitigation plan shall include monitoring 50 percent of the excavation activities on the project
site by a City-approved archaeologist and/or their representative. The discovery
clause/treatment plan shall include recovery and subsequent treatment of any archaeological or
historical remains and associated data uncovered by brushing, grubbing or excavation. The
treatment plan shall provide procedures for the curation of any detected cultural specimens.
Any recovered cultural resources shall be identified, sites recorded, mapped and artifacts
catalogued as required by standard professional archaeological practices. Examination by an
archaeological specialist shall be included where necessary, dependent upon the artifacts,
features, or sites that are encountered. Specialists will identify, date and/or determine
significance potential.
• If the archaeological monitor discovers cultural deposits, earthmoving shall be diverted
temporarily around the deposits until the deposits have been evaluated, recorded, excavated
and/or recovered, as necessary, and in accordance with a City-approved recovery plan.
Earthmoving shall be allowed to proceed through the area after the archaeologist determines
the artifacts are recovered and/or site mitigated to the extent necessary.
• If a previously unknown cultural site is encountered during monitoring and it is determined by
the archaeologist that a significance determination is required, the site shall be evaluated and
recorded in accordance with requirements of the State Office of Historic Preservation (i.e.,
DPR 523 form). In this case, if the site is not determined to be significant, no measures
subsequent to recording the site on appropriate forms are required. If any of the sites are
determined to be significant, an adequate amount of artifacts at the specific archaeological site
shall be collected by the City-approved archaeologist. The archaeologist shall determine the
amount of artifacts needed to be collected.
• If human remains are encountered during excavations associated with this project, all work
shall halt and the County Coroner shall be notified (Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources
Code). The Coroner will determine whether the remains are of forensic interest. If the
Tentative Tract SUBTr16072/Richland Pinehurst,Inc. 14 Findings
coroner, with the aid of the City-approved archaeologist, determines that the remains are
prehistoric, he/she will contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). The
NAHC will be responsible for designating the most likely descendant (MLD), who will be
responsible for the ultimate disposition of the remains, as required by Section 7050.5 of the
California Health and Safety Code. The MLD will make his/her recommendations within 24
hours of their notification by the NAHC. This recommendation may include scientific
removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native
American burials(Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code).
• Any recovered archaeological resources shall be identified, sites recorded, mapped and
artifacts catalogued as required by standard archaeological practices. Examination by an
archaeological specialist should be included where necessary, dependent upon the artifacts,
features or sites that are encountered. Specialists will identify, date and/or determine
significance potential.
• A final report of findings will be prepared by the City-approved archaeologist for submission
to the City, project applicant, and the Archaeological Information Center of the San
Bernardino County Museum. The report will describe the history of the project area,
summarize field and laboratory methods used, if applicable, and include any testing or special
analysis information conducted to support the resultant findings.
Paleontological Resources
Potentially Significant Impact
According to the paleontological records search, the project area lies on surface exposures of
Pleistocene older fan deposits. These deposits have high potential to contain fossil resources
throughout their extent. No fossil resources are known for the project area and the nearest resources
found in similar deposits are located approximately eight miles to the south. However, there is the
likelihood of potential buried fossilized remains.
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid
the significant effects on the environment.
Facts in Support of Finding
The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than
significant by virtue of project design features and the following mitigation measures as identified in
the final EIR and incorporated into the project.
• Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall retain a City-approved
paleontologist. The City-approved paleontologist shall monitor all excavation activities in
areas of the project underlain by previously undisturbed sediments. Earthmoving in areas of
the site where previously undisturbed sediments will be buried but not disturbed will not be
monitored. Monitoring shall begin once earthmoving reaches five (5) feet below the original
ground surface.
• Monitoring shall be conducted on a full-time basis in areas of the project underlain by
sensitive rock units associated with older alluvium being encountered by earthmoving.
Tentative Tract SUBM 6072/Richland Pinehurst,Inc. 15 Findings
• Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing
activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make
the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the
monitor of the find. If too few fossil remains are found after 50 percent of earthmoving has
been completed, monitoring can be reduced or discontinued in those areas at the project
paleontologist's direction.
• If paleontological resources are detected. Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for
documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San
Bernardino County Museum).
• A final report of findings will be prepared by the City-approved paleontologist for submission
to the City, project applicant, and the San Bernardino County Museum. All collected
specimens and the final report shall be provided to the San Bernardino County Museum.
PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES
Water Service
Significant Impact
The proposed project will result in the demand for approximately 220,760 gallons of water per day
which represents a 0.7 percent increase in water currently demanded from existing development within
the City's General Plan Planning Area. The project's demand for water is nominal; however, it will
contribute to the potential significant cumulative impacts on water services.
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid
the significant effects on the environment.
Facts in Support of Finding
The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than
significant by virtue of project design features and the following mitigation measures as identified in
the final EIR and incorporated into the project.
• Prior to the issuance of building permits, the project applicant will be required to submit a
water services development fee to ensure that adequate water supplies and facilities are
available to meet the project demand.
• Prior to the issuance of a building permit for each phase, the project applicant shall submit a
landscaping and irrigation plan for common areas to the City for approval. Landscaping and
irrigation within common areas shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of
Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code.
Wastewater Service
Significant Impact
Implementation of the proposed project will result in the generation of 96,930 gallons of wastewater
per day.
Tentative Tract SUBTr16072/Richland Pinehurst,Inc. 16 Findings
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid
the significant effects on the environment.
Facts in Support of Finding
The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than
significant by virtue of project design features and the following mitigation measures as identified in
the final EIR and incorporated into the project.
Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, the applicant shall provide funding to the
Cucamonga County Water Agency for sewer service.
HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY (NOTICE OF PREPARATION)
Significant Impact
The proposed residential uses have the potential to create contaminated runoff containing compounds
such as landscape chemicals and automotive fluids.
Finding
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid
the significant effects on the environment.
Facts in Support of Finding
The significant effect has been eliminated or substantially lessened to a level that is less than
significant by virtue of project design features and the following mitigation measures as identified in
the final EIR and incorporated into the project.
• Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant will be required to prepare a
Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan (SWPPP) and file a Notice of Intent with the Regional
Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). As part of standard construction practices, the City
and RWQCB will require compliance with best management practices (BMPs) to ensure
potentially harmful chemicals or pollutants are not discharged from the site. Such measures
may include sandbags, temporary drainage diversion and temporary containment areas.
SIGNIFICANT UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE IMPACTS
The potential significant adverse impacts associated with the implementation of the Tentative Tract
Map Number 16072 project are listed below. The Rancho Cucamonga City Council finds that these
potential significant adverse impacts would be reduced with the implementation of the project-related
design features and recommended mitigation measures; however, the impacts cannot be reduced to a
level less than significant. The Rancho Cucamonga City Council is adopting a Statement of
Overriding Consideration per Section 15093 of the CEQA Guidelines.
'rentative Tract SUBTT16072/Richland Pinehurst,Inc. 17 Findings
GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Seismic Hazards
Seismic Ground Shaking
Significant Impact
The proposed residential structures on the project site would be exposed to potentially high
accelerations of ground motion.
Finding
Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project
alternatives identified in the final EIR.
Facts in Support of Finding
Implementation of the following mitigation measures will serve to lessen project impacts; however,
the impacts would remain significant. While the No Project/No Development Alternative would avoid
significant and unavoidable seismic impacts, this alternative would not meet any of the project
objectives. The Retention of Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub Alternative (RAFSS) would
decrease the amount of development, but would not meet any of the project objectives. The Less
intense development alternative would avoid the significant and unavoidable air quality impact, but
does not meet any of the project objectives.
• Prior to the issuance of a building permit, structures will be designed and constructed in
accordance with the Uniform Building Code and general engineering standards for seismic
safety for development within Seismic Zone 4.
The significant and unavoidable adverse impacts related to seismic hazards by the proposed project are
considered to be acceptable in light of the Statement of Overriding Considerations provided herein as
Attachment A.
AIR QUALITY
Short-Term Construction-Related Emissions
Significant Impact
Short-term emissions will include fugitive dust and other particulate matter, as well as exhaust
emissions, generated by earthmoving activities and operation of grading equipment during site
preparation (demolition and grading). Short-term emissions will also include emissions generated
during construction of the buildings as a result of operation of equipment, operation of personal
vehicles by construction workers, electrical consumption, and coating and paint applications.
Projected NOx, ROC, and PM10 emissions are above the SCAQMD recommended daily thresholds
and NOx and ROC are above the quarterly thresholds during construction of the first phase of the
project. The primary sources of NOx emissions are trucks used for rock removal and importation of
concrete. The primary source of ROC emissions is the application of architectural coatings, and the
primary source of PM10 is fugitive dust from earthmoving activities. Even with the reductions
associated with implementation of construction related mitigation measures, the daily and quarterly
emissions of NOx and ROC remain above the SCAQMD suggested thresholds.
Tentative Tract SUBTTI6072/Richland Pinehurst,Inc. 18 Findings
Finding
Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project
alternatives identified in the final EIR.
Facts in Support of Finding
Implementation of the following mitigation measures will serve to lessen project impacts; however,
the impacts would remain significant. The No Project/No Development Alternative would avoid
significant and unavoidable short-term construction related emission impacts; this alternative would
not meet any of the project objectives. The Retention of Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub
Alternative (RAFSS) would decrease the amount of development, but would also not meet any of the
project objectives. The Less Intense Development alternative would avoid the significant and
unavoidable air quality impact, but does not meet any of the project objectives and is not considered
feasible.
• The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agents(approved by SCAQMD
and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM 10 emissions,in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403.
• During construction, all haul roads shall be swept according to a schedule established by the
City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may
vary depending upon time of year of construction.
• Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM 10
emissions from the site during such episodes.
• Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all
inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10
emissions.
• The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on low
emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the
construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned
and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications.
• The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment,
where feasible.
• The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement
that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use.
• The construction contractor shall use low VOC architectural coating during the construction
phase of the project.
• During construction of the proposed improvements, temporary traffic control (e.g., flag
person) will be provided during soil transport activities. Contractor will be advised not to idle
trucks on site for more than ten minutes.
• During construction of the proposed improvements, only low volatility paints and coatings as
defined in SCAQMD Rule 1113 shall be used. All paints shall be applied using either high
volume low pressure (HVLP) spray equipment or by hand application.
Tentative Tract SUBTT16072/Richland Pinehurst,Inc. 19 Findings
The significant and unavoidable adverse impacts related to short-term construction emissions
associated with the proposed project are considered to be acceptable in light of the Statement of
Overriding Considerations provided herein as Attachment A.
Long-Term Emissions
Significant Impact
Long-term impacts for the proposed residential subdivision consist of mobile emissions and stationary
emissions. Mobile emissions estimates are derived from motor vehicle traffic. Stationary emissions
estimates are derived from the consumption of natural gas, electricity, the use of landscape equipment,
and the storage and use of consumer products. When unmitigated emissions projections are compared
with the SCAQMD suggested thresholds for significance, it is shown that long-term emissions exceed
the applicable thresholds for NOx, CO and ROC. The primary source of these emissions is mobile
emissions from vehicles. Even with the mitigation incorporated into the project NOx, CO and ROC
emissions remain above the SCAQMD recommended threshold, and therefore the project may be
expected to violate an ambient air quality standard.
Finding
Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project
alternatives identified in the final EIR.
Facts in Support of Finding
Implementation of the following mitigation measures will serve to lessen project impacts; however,
the impacts would remain significant. The No Project/No Development Alternative would avoid
significant and unavoidable long-term emission impacts; this alternative would not meet any of the
project objectives. The Retention of Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub Alternative (RAFSS) would
decrease the amount of development, but would also not meet any of the project objectives. The Less
Intense Development alternative would avoid the significant and unavoidable air quality impact, but
does not meet any of the project objectives and is not considered feasible.
• The proposed project will participate in the cost of off-site traffic signal installation and
synchronization through payment of the traffic signal fair-share mitigation fee. This fee will
be collected and utilized by the City to install and synchronize traffic lights as needed to
prevent congestion of traffic flow on East Avenue between Banyan Street and the project
boundary, and Etiwanda Avenue between Highland Avenue and the north terminus of
Etiwanda Avenue.
• All appliances within the residential units of the project shall be energy-efficient as defined by
SCAQMD.
• The project proponent shall contact local transit agencies to determine bus routing in the
project area that can accommodate bus stops at the project access points and determine
locations and feasibility of bus stop shelters provided at project proponent's expense.
The significant and unavoidable adverse impacts related to long-term air emissions associated with the
proposed project are considered to be acceptable in light of the Statement of Overriding
Considerations provided herein as Attachment A.
Tentative Traci SUBTT16072/Richland Pinehurst,Inc. 20 Findings
Consistency Analysis
Significant Impact
The proposed project complies with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, which is consistent
with the land use information that was the basis for the current AQMP. However, it is noted that the
specific analysis indicates that both short-term and long-term emissions as a result of the project are
above the SCAQMD thresholds. These emissions remain above the thresholds after implementation
of mitigation measures. For this reason, it is appropriate to conclude that the proposed project is not in
compliance with the AQMP.
Finding
Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project
alternatives identified in the final EIR.
Facts in Support of Finding
Implementation of the following mitigation measures will serve to lessen project impacts; however,
the impacts would remain significant. The No Project/No Development Alternative would avoid
significant and unavoidable impacts; this alternative would not meet any of the project objectives. The
Retention of Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub Alternative (RAFSS) would decrease the amount of
development, but would also not meet any of the project objectives. The Less Intense Development
alternative would avoid the significant and unavoidable air quality impact, but does not meet any of
the project objectives and is not considered feasible.
All feasible mitigation measures for reduction of air quality impacts have been incorporated
into the project. However, short-term and long-term emissions remain above threshold levels
for several pollutants after implementation.
The significant and unavoidable adverse impacts related to air emissions by the proposed project are
considered to be acceptable in light of the Statement of Overriding Considerations provided herein as
Attachment A.
AESTHETICS
Significant Impact
Development of the proposed project and cumulative development in the project vicinity will result in
the permanent alteration of the visual landscape of the San Gabriel Mountains.
Finding
Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project
alternatives identified in the final EIR.
Facts in Support of Finding
Implementation of the following mitigation measures will serve to lessen project impacts; however,
the impacts would remain significant. The No Project/No Development Alternative would avoid
significant and unavoidable long-term aesthetic impacts; this alternative would not meet any of the
project objectives. The Retention of Riversidian Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub Alternative (RAFSS) would
decrease the amount of development, but would also not meet any of the project objectives. The Less
Tentative Tract SUBTT16072/Richland Pinehurst,Inc. 21 Findings
Intense Development alternative would avoid the significant and unavoidable air quality impact, but
does not meet any of the project objectives.
• The applicant shall install landscaping and perimeter walls prior to issuance of building
permits for the following phases and locations as shown on the Project Phasing Plan (Exhibit
3-8):
• Phase 1-Along Wilson and Etiwanda Avenues.
• Phase 2-Along Wilson Avenue
• Phase 3-Along Etiwanda Avenue
• Phase 4 Along East Avenue
• Prior to approval of a landscape plan,the project applicant shall provide transitions between
the developed and natural (unbuilt)environment through landscaping techniques
• Prior to approval of a landscape plan, the project applicant shall ensure that streetscape design
along the roadways adjacent to the project site create a strong landscaped edge, provides a
coherent high-quality appearance along a particular route, and enhances the image of adjacent
development.
• The project applicant shall provide for the undergrounding of utility lines and facilities,
wherever feasible, to minimize the unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility
enclosures.
• Prior to approval of a landscape plan, trees and structures shall be used to frame and orient
such views at key locations, and obstruction of views should be kept to a minimum along
Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue.
The significant and unavoidable adverse impacts on aesthetics and views by the proposed project are
considered to be acceptable in light of the Statement of Overriding Considerations provided herein as
Attachment A.
Tentative Tract SUBT716072/Richland Pinehurst,Inc. 22 Findings
STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires the lead agency to balance the benefits of
a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether to approve the
project. The City of Rancho Cucamonga proposes to approve the Tentative Tract Map Number 16072
project although unavoidable adverse geology and soils, air quality, and aesthetic impacts have been
identified in the EIR. Even though these adverse impacts are not reduced to a level considered less
than significant, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council finds that those impacts are outweighed by the
benefits of the Tentative Tract Map Number 16072 project. Further, the altematives which were
identified in the EIR would not provide the project benefits, as summarized below, to the same extent
as the proposed project:
1. To provide single-family housing units consistent with the intent of the City's General Plan
and the Etiwanda North Specific Plan.
2. To annex the proposed 150-acre tentative tract and an adjacent 10-acre area at the northwest
corner of Wilson and East Avenue into the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
3. To be consistent with, and implement, the policies and goals of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga General Plan, Etiwanda North Specific Plan, City Development Code, and all
other City development guidelines.
4. To create a project that is generally consistent and compatible with other existing and
proposed uses in the vicinity of the project and community of Etiwanda in general.
5. To provide project infrastructure including streets, water and sewer mains, and flood control
consistent with City and regional plans related to these services.
6. To phase the development of the proposed project to ensure adequate utilities are provided.
7. Provide a system of public/community facilities, including parks, trails, open space areas, and
landscaping to support the residents of the project and surrounding area in an efficient and
timely manner.
8. To design and landscape the proposed project to create an aesthetically pleasing living
environment.
Therefore, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council, having reviewed and considered the information
contained in the EIR and the public record, adopts the Statement of Overriding Considerations, which
has been balanced against the unavoidable adverse impacts in reaching a decision on this project.
Tentative Tract SUBTT16072/Richland Pinehurst,Inc. 23 Findings
City of Rancho Cucamonga
- MITIGATION MONITORING
PROGRAM
Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16072 - Richland Pinehurst
This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP)has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation
measures identified in the Environmental Impact Report for the above-listed project. This program
has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are
implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code).
Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements:
1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and
the procedure necessary to ensure compliance.The mitigation measure conditions of approval
are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project.
2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This
procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom .
and when compliance will be reported.
3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring
progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon
recommendations by those responsible for the program.
Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project
planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project
planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly
and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the
conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department.
Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants'fees, incurred by the City in
performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant.
2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its
corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached
hereto. This procedure designates who will take action,what action will be taken and when,and
to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will
be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the
project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
EXHIBIT "B"
Mitigation Monitoring Program
SUBTT16072
Page 2
3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed,as
determined by the project planner or responsible City department,to monitor specific mitigation
activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner.
4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the
completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each
measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of
development.
5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off
as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP
Reporting Form.
6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation
measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions.
An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department
and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel.
7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of
construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written
notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the
authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached
hereto is not occurring.The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to
hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented.
8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the
responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division.The Division shall require the
applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee)with the City. These funds
shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report
on the mitigation measure for the required period of time.
9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City
with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring
results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether
the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall
conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or
City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits.
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III)
Project File No.: SUBTT16072 Applicant: Richland-Pinehurst
EIR Prepared by: Michael Brandman Assoicates Date: March 23. 2004
ResponsibleMitigation Measures No. of
. . .
Verificationimplementing Action for Monitoring Frequency
Date/initials Non-compliance
Aesthetics
AES-1:The applicant shall install landscaping and perimeter CP C Prior to A 3
walls prior to occupancy for the following phases and occupancy of
locations as shown on the Project Phasing Plan(Exhibit 3-8): each phase.
• Phase 1-Along Wilson and Etiwanda Avenues.
• Phase 2-Along Wilson Avenue
• Phase 3-Along Etiwanda Avenue
• Phase 4 Along East Avenue
AES-2: Prior to approval of a landscape plan, the project CP B During Landscape C 2
applicant shall provide transitions between the developed and Plan Review and
natural(unbuilt)environment through landscaping techniques. approval
AES-3: Prior to approval of a landscape plan, the project CP B C C 2
applicant shall ensure that streetscape design along the
roadways adjacent to the project site create a strong
landscaped edge, provides a coherent high-quality
appearance along a particular route,and enhances the image
of adjacent development.
AES-4: The project applicant shall provide for the CE C During C 2
undergrounding of utility lines and facilities,wherever feasible, construction Plan
to minimize the unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines review and
and utility enclosures. approval
AES-5: Prior to approval of a landscape plan, trees and CP B During C 2
structures shall be used to frame and orient such views at key construction Plan
locations, and obstruction of views should be kept to a review and
minimum along Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue. approval
Air Quality
AQ-1: The site shall be treated with water or other soil- BO/CE C During A 4
stabilizing agent(approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water construction
Quality Control Board [RWQCBj) daily to reduce PM10
emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403.
1of13
Mitigation Measures No.
Responsible of Method of Verif led Sanctions for
Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification
Date/initials Non-Compliance
AQ-2: During construction, all haul routes shall be swept CE C During A 4
according to a schedule established by the City to reduce construction
PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-
site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of
construction.
AQ-3: Suspend grading operations when wind speeds BO/CE C During A 4
exceeding 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site construction
during such episodes.
AQ-4: Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and BO/CE C During A 4
RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas construction
that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10
emissions.
AQ-5: The Construction contractor shall select the CP/CE C Review of plans A/C 2/4
construction equipment used on-site based on low emission
factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction
contractor shall ensure the construction grading plans include
a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned to
and maintained in accordance with the manufacturers
specifications.
AQ-6: The construction contractor shall utilize electric or CE C Review of plans A/C 4
clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible.
AQ-7: The construction contractor shall ensure that CE C Review of plans A/C 2/4
construction-grading plans include a statement that work
crews will shut off equipment when not in use.
AQ-8: The construction contractor shall use low VOC CP C Review of plans A/C 2/4
architectural coating during the construction phase of the
project.
AQ-9: During construction of the proposed improvements, BO/CE C As needed during A/C 4
temporary traffic control (e.g., flag person) will be provided construction.
during soil transport activities. Contractor will be advised not
to idle trucks on site for more than ten minutes
AQ-10: During construction of the proposed improvements, CP/BO C Review of Notes A/C 4
only low volatility paints and coatings as defined in SCAQMD on Plans
Rule 1113 shall be used. All paints shall be applied using
either high volume low pressure(HVLP)spray equipment or
by hand application.
2of13
Mitigation Measures No.
Responsible
MonitoringImplementing Action for
Date/initials Non-Compliance
AQ-11:The proposed project will participate in the cost of off- CE A Prior to permit C/D 2
site traffic signal installation and synchronization through issuance.
payment of the traffic signal fair-share mitigation fee. This fee
will be collected and utilized by the City to install and
synchronize traffic lights as needed to prevent congestion of
traffic flow on East Avenue between Banyan Street and the
project boundary, and Etiwanda Avenue between Highland
Avenue and the north terminus of Etiwanda Avenue.
AQ-12:All appliances within the residential units of the project CP/BO B Plan review. C 3
shall be energy-efficient as defined by SCAQMD.
AQ-13: The project proponent shall contact local transit CP/CE B Plan review. C/D 3
agencies to determine bus routing in the project area that can
accommodate bus stops at the project access points and
determine locations and feasibility of bus stop shelters
provided at project proponent's expense.
Biological Resources
B-1: Prior to recording of the first final map of the project,the CP A Prior to map B/D 1
property owner shall transfer to the County of San Bernardino recordation.
Special Districts OS-1 or other qualified conservation entity
approved by the City, in fee, at a ratio of 1:1 (or 147.7 acres)
of off-site land for permanent open space and habitat
preservation; along with funding in an amount to be mutually
agreed upon by the property owner and the conservation
entity,to provide for long-term maintenance of said land. The
preferred location of the off-site land is in the environment
surrounding the North Etiwanda Preserve in the City Sphere
of Influence, other properties may be considered based the
review of appropriate Biological Habitat Assessments and
concurrence of the City Planner.
If the proponent is unable to acquire all or a portion of the
offsite mitigation land, the proponent will deposit the
equivalent mitigation cost of $10,000 per developable acre
with City-approved agency, which acquires and maintains
open space. These funds will be used to purchase and
manage mitigation lands.
3 of 13
Mitigation Measures No.
Responsible of Verif led Sanctions for
Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification
Date/initials Non-Compliance
B-2:To reduce impacts on adjacent offsite habitat during site CP B Plan review and A/C 4
preparation,grading and clearing limits shall be staked prior construction
to issuance of the grading permits. The limits of grading and monitoring.
clearing shall be staked at 50-foot intervals with suitable
indicators such as white PVC (polyvinylchloride) pipe with
steel bases. Construction equipment shall not be operated
beyond the grading and clearing limits, and a restoration
program shall be incorporated to restore any disturbed offsite
areas.
B-3: Landscaping adjacent to natural areas offsite shall use CP A Plan review. C 2
native and drought-tolerant plant species.Such species shall
be reflected on Project landscape plans. The use of species
known to be weedy invasives, such as German ivy(Senecio
milkaniodes), periwinkle (Vince major), or iceplant
(Carpobrotus spp.), shall be prohibited.
B-4: In areas where night lighting may have adverse impacts CP A Plan review. C 2/4
on sensitive wildlife habitat, one or more of the following
alternatives shall be utilized, recognizing the constraints of
roadway lighting requirements:(1)low-intensity street lamps,
(2) low-elevation light poles, or (3) shielding of internal
silvering of the globes or external opaque reflectors.
B-5: Provide residents of the future development literature CP D Review literature D 3
pertaining to sensitive wildlife in the area and provide ways prior to Model
the residents can reduce effects on the wildlife, including Home TUP
effects pets have on native wildlife. A list of invasive plants approval.
that are commonly planted in landscaping will be included in
this literature and it will be recommended that certain plants
be avoided, such as giant reed (Arundo donax)castor bean
(Ricinus communis)and Pampas grass(Cortaderia selloana).
This literature shall be approved by the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and included within the conditions, covenants,
and restrictions (CC&Rs).
B-6: All 213 "heritage trees'shall be removed and replaced CP C Landscape Plan C 3
with native trees within the proposed development, review.
Replacements have been proposed at a 1:1 ratio.
4 of 13
Mitigation Measures No.
Responsible . . Timing of Method . - . Sanctions for
Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification
Date/initials Non-Compliance
B-7:Prior to issuance of a grading permit,focused surveys for CP B Verify results of B/D 2
Plummer's mariposa lily shall be conducted by a qualified surveys prior to
biologist. Surveys shall be conducted during flowering period Grading Permit
(May to July) in all portions of the project site containing issuance.
suitable habitat. If present,the number and location(s)will be
documented and the resource agencies will be notified for
consultation and possible collection and relocation.
B-8: A follow-up focus survey for the San Bernardino CP B Verify results of B/D 2
kangaroo rat shall be conducted prior to the issuance of surveys prior to
grading permits. If this species is determined to be present Grading Permit
onsite, consultation with USFWS under the Endangered issuance.
Species Act shall occur and USFWS-approved mitigation
measures shall be implemented.
B-9:A follow-up focused survey shall be conducted to confirm CP B Verify results of B/D 2
the absence of the coastal California gnatcatcher. Special surveys prior to
focus will be placed in the northwest corner of the project site, Grading Permit
which was not previously surveyed. If this species is issuance.
determined to be present onsite, consultation with USFWS
under the Endangered Species Act shall occur and USFWS-
approved mitigation measures shall be implemented.
B-10: The project proponent will have a qualified biological CP A Verify that the D 4
monitor present during initial brush clearing to reduce monitor has been
mortality to sensitive species, specifically sensitive rodent obtained prior to
species, as well as incidental species. Grading Permit
issuance.
B-11: If grading activities are to occur during active nesting CP A Verify that the D 4
season (generally February 15 -August 31), a field survey monitor has been
shall be conducted by a qualified biologist to determine if obtained prior to
active nests covered by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and/or Grading Permit
the CDFG Code are present. If active nests are present,the issuance.
area will be flagged,along with a 100-foot buffer(300-feet for
raptors) and will be avoided until the nesting cycle is
complete.
B-12:The project proponent shall obtain a Section 404 of the CP A Verify permit B 2
Clean Water Act permit from the U.S. Army Corps of status prior to
Engineers and a 1603 Streambed Alteration Permit from issuance of
California Department of Fish and Game prior to grading or Grading Permit.
any other groundbreaking activities,and shall complywith the
permit's mitigation requirements.
5 of 13
Mitigation Measures No.
Responsible SanctionsVerified
Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance
Cultural Resources
CR-1: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the project CP A Verify that the D 2
applicant shall retain a City-approved archaeologist to monitor has been
develop an archaeological mitigation plan and a discovery obtained prior to
clause/treatment plan. Both of these plans shall be reviewed Grading Permit
and approved by the City.The archaeological mitigation plan issuance,
shall include monitoring 50 percent of the excavation activities
on the project site by a City-approved archaeologist and/or
their representative.The discovery clause/treatment plan shall
include recovery. and subsequent treatment of any
archaeological or historical remains and associated data
uncovered by brushing,grubbing or excavation.The treatment
plan shall provide procedures for the curation of any detected
cultural specimens. Any recovered cultural resources shall be
identified,sites recorded,mapped and artifacts catalogued as
required by standard professional archaeological practices.
Examination by an archaeological specialist shall be included
where necessary, dependent upon the artifacts,features, or
sites that are encountered. Specialists will identify, date
and/or determine significance potential.
CR-2: If the archaeological monitor discovers cultural CP C Verify results of D 4
deposits, earthmoving shall be diverted temporarily around reports by the on-
the deposits until the deposits have been evaluated, site monitor.
recorded,excavated and/or recovered,as necessary,and in
accordance with a City-approved recovery plan. Earthmoving
shall be allowed to proceed through the area after the
archaeologist determines the artifacts are recovered and/or
site mitigated to the extent necessary.
CR-3: If a previously unknown cultural site is encountered CP C Verify results of D 4
during monitoring and it is determined by the archaeologist reports by the on-
that a significance determination is required,the site shall be site monitor.
evaluated and recorded in accordance with requirements of
the State Office of Historic Preservation(i.e., DPR 523 form).
In this case, if the site is not determined to be significant, no
measures subsequent to recording the site on appropriate
forms are required. If any of the sites are determined to be
significant, an adequate amount of artifacts at the specific
archaeological site shall be collected by the City-approved
archaeologist.The archaeologist shall determine the amount
of artifacts needed to be collected.
6 of 13
Mitigation Measures No.
Responsible
Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification
Date/initials Non-Compliance
CR-4: If human remains are encountered during excavations CP C Verify results of D 4
associated with this project,all work shall halt and the County reports by the on-
Coroner shall be notified (Section 5097.98 of the Public site monitor.
Resources Code). The Coroner will determine whether the
remains are of forensic interest. If the coroner,with the aid of
the City-approved archaeologist,determines that the remains
are prehistoric, he/she will contact the Native American
Heritage Commission(NAHC). The NAHC will be responsible
for designating the most likely descendant(MLD),who will be
responsible for the ultimate disposition of the remains, as
required by Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety
Code. The MLD will make his/her recommendations within 24
hours of their notification by the NAHC. This recommendation
may include scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of
human remains and items associated with Native American
burials (Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code).
CR-5: Any recovered archaeological resources shall be CP C Verify results of D 4
identified,sites recorded,mapped and artifacts catalogued as reports by the on-
required by standard archaeological practices. Examination site monitor.
by an archaeological specialist should be included where
necessary,dependent upon the artifacts,features orsites that
are encountered. Specialists will identify, date and/or
determine significance potential.
CR-6: A final report of findings will be prepared by the City- CP C Verify results of D 4
approved archaeologist for submission to the City, project reports by the on-
applicant, and the Archaeological Information Center of the site monitor.
San Bernardino County Museum. The report will describe the
history of the project area, summarize field and laboratory
methods used,if applicable,and include any testing or special
analysis information conducted to support the resultant
findings.
CR-7: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the project CP A Verify that the D 2
applicant shall retain a City-approved paleontologist.The City- monitor has been
approved paleontologist shall monitor all excavation activities obtained prior to
in areas of the project underlain by previously undisturbed Grading Permit
sediments. Earthmoving in areas of the site where previously issuance.
undisturbed sediments will be buried but not disturbed will not
be monitored. Monitoring shall begin once earthmoving
reaches five (5)feet below the original ground surface.
7 of 13
Mitigation Measures No. Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verif ied Sanctions for
Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification
Date/initials Non-Compliance
CR-8: Monitoring shall be conducted on a full-time basis in CP C Verify results of D 4
areas of the project underlain by sensitive rock units reports by the un-
associated with older alluvium being encountered by site monitor.
earthmoving.
-L
CR-9:Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or CP C Verify results of D 4
graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the reports by the on-
monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel site monitor.
make the discovery, the grading contractor should
immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the
find. If too few fossil remains are found after 50 percent of
earthmoving has been completed,monitoring can be reduced
or discontinued in those areas at the project paleontologist's
direction.
CR-10: If paleontological resources are detected. Prepare, CP C Verify results of D 4
identify,and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in reports by the on-
the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository site monitor.
(i.e., San Bernardino County Museum),
CR-11: A final report of findings will be prepared by the City- CP C Verify results of D 4
approved paleontologist for submission to the City, project reports by the on-
applicant, and the San Bernardino County Museum. All site monitor.
collected specimens and the final report shall be provided to
the San Bernardino County Museum.
Geology and Soils
GS-1: Prior to issuance of a building permit for structures CP/BO A Report and Plan D 2
adjacent to the Etiwanda Avenue Scarp thrust fault on the review.
project site, all structures north of this fault shall be set back
100 feet from the faulted zone and all structures south of this
fault shall be set back 50 feet from the fault zone.
GS-2:Prior to the issuance of a building permit,structures will BO A Plan review. C 2
be designed and constructed in accordance with the Uniform
Building Code and general engineering standards forseismic
safety for development within Seismic Zone 4.
GS-3: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, engineered BO A Plan review. C 2
slopes of the project site shall be designed in accordance with
the Uniform Building Code to resist seismically induced
failures. Slope design shall be based on pseudo-static
stability analyses using soil-engineering parameters
established for the site.
8of13
Mitigation Measures No.
Responsible
Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance
GS-4: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the grading BO A Plan review and C 2
plans shall state that the loose,cohesionless soils located on notations.
the surface of the site shall be removed and recompacted
during grading operations.
GS-5: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the grading BO A Plan review and C 2
plans shall state that the native surficial and artificial fills on notation.
the project site that are of low density,shall be removed and
recompacted or exported offsite.
GS-6: Prior to the issuance of a final grading approval, BO A Plan review. C 2
potentially unstable graded slopes that exceed approximately
15 feet in height will require additional stabilization measures
such as buttressing cut slopes with compacted fill, adding
geogrid reinforcement to fill slopes,using a higher compaction
standard, and/or using retaining walls.
GS-7: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit,the grading BO A Plan review. C 2
plans shall state that potentially compressible soils that are
located on the project site shall be removed and recompacted
in accordance with standard grading procedures.
GS-8: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit,the project's CE/BO A Plan review and C 2
soil engineer shall identify the method(s) of eliminating the notations.
potential for collapsible soils on the grading plan. Potential
methods include excavation and recompaction and
presaturation and pre-loading of the susceptible soils in-place
to induce collapse prior to construction. After construction,
infiltration of water into the subsurface soils shall be
minimized by proper surface drainage which directs excess
runoff from the proposed slopes and structures.
GS-9: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the grading BO/CE A Review of Plans C 2
plans shall state that during grading operations, the soil and notations.
engineer shall be consulted to relocate oversize rocks on the
project site to reduce the potential deficiency of fill materials
that could result from the removal of oversize rocks on the
project site.
Noise
N-1:During all project site excavation and grading,the project CP C Review notations A/C 2/4
contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or on the Grading
mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers Plan.
consistent with manufacturers standards.
9of13
Mitigation Measures No.I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verif ied Sanctions for
Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance
N-2:When construction operations occur in close proximityto CP C Review notations A/C 2/4
occupied residential areas, appropriate additional noise on the Grading
reduction measures shall be implemented, including: Plan; and monitor
changing the location of stationary construction equipment to during
maximize the distance between stationary equipment and construction.
occupied residential areas, installing muffling devices on
equipment, shutting off idling equipment, notifying adjacent
residences in advance of construction, and installing
temporary acoustic barriers around stationary construction
noise sources.
N-3: The construction contractor shall locate equipment CP C Review notations A/C 2/4
staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between on the Grading
construction related noise and the noise-sensitive receptors Plan; and monitor
nearest the project site during all project construction. during
construction.
N-4: During all project site construction, the construction BO C Review notations A 4
contract shall limit all construction related activities that would on the Grading
result in high noise levels to between the hours of 6:30 a.m. Plan;and monitor
and 8:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday. No construction during
shall be allowed on Sundays and public holidays. construction.
N-5: The project applicant shall construct sound barriers CP A Review of plans. A/C 2/4
adjacent to the project lots as shown in Exhibit 5.5-2. The
heights of the sound barriers shall be between 3 and 6.5 feet
and placed at the top of the proposed slope and at the edge
of pads on the residential lots that border Etiwanda Avenue,
Wilson Avenue, and East Avenue. The sound barriers may
be constructed of earthen berms, masonry, wood, or other
similar materials, or combination of these materials to attain
the total height required. These sound barriers shall be solid,
with no openings from the ground to the indicated height.
N-6: Prior to the issuance of a building permit, residential CP/BO A Plan review. A/C 2/4
structures proposed on all lots adjacent to Etiwanda Avenue,
Wilson Avenue, and East Avenue will require mechanical
ventilation so that windows can remain closed. Furthermore,
these residential lots will require upgraded windows such as
double-pane windows, if these lots have second story
structures. To ensure the specific type of mechanical
ventilation and paned windows are included in the building
plans, a final acoustical study shall be prepared for City
approval prior to approval of Development Review
applications for product development. The final acoustical
study shall identify the specific requirements to reduce future
interior noise levels to 45 dB CNEL or less.
10 of 13
Mitigation Measures No. Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method
of Verif ied Sanctions for
Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date
Public Services and Utilities
F-1: Prior to the issuance building permits, the project FC A Plan review. B/C 2
applicant shall obtain approval from RCFD of the designs for
the fire flow and proposed fire resistant structural materials.
W-1: Prior to the issuance of building permits, the project Cucamonga A Plan review. B/C 2
applicant will be required to submit a water services Valley Water
development fee to ensure that adequate water supplies and District
facilities are available to meet the project demand.
W-2:Prior to the issuance of a building permit for each phase, Cucamonga A Plan review. B/C 2
the project applicant shall submit a landscaping and irrigation Valley Water
plan for common areas to the City for approval. Landscaping District
and irrigation within common areas shall be designed to
conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined
in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code.
WW-1: Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, the Cucamonga A Plan review. B/C 2
applicant shall provide funding to the Cucamonga County Valley Water
Water Agency for sewer service. District
S-1: Prior to the issuance of building permits, the project Etiwanda A Provide B 2
applicant shall pay developer impact fees to the Etiwanda School District; verification prior
School District and Chaffey Joint Union High.School District in Chaffey School to permit
accordance with Section 65995 of the Government Code for District issuance.
the proposed residences.
Transportation/Traffic
TT-1: The project applicant shall contribute its fair share CE A Review C/D 2/3
toward local off-site traffic improvements. On-site appropriate plans
improvements will be required in conjunction with the phasing or reports prior to
of the proposed development to ensure adequate circulation permit issuance.
within the project itself. The fair share contribution of all off-
site improvements and timing of all onsite traffic
improvements shall be subject to an agreement with the City
of Rancho Cucamonga. This agreement shall be in place
prior to tract map approval.
TT-2: The project applicant shall update construction cost CE A Review C/D 2/3
estimates and prepare a current cost of the project's fair appropriate plans
share contribution toward traffic improvements. or reports prior to
permit issuance.
11 of 13
Mitigation . . Method of Verified Sanctions for
Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance
TT-3: The project applicant shall construct Wilson Avenue CE A Review C/D 2/3
from Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue as a Special Divided appropriate plans
Secondary Arterial (165 ft. Right-of-way) in conjunction with or reports prior to
development of the proposed project or as determined by the permit issuance.
Development Agreement with the City.
TT-4: The project applicant shall construct the extension of CE A Review C/D 2/3
East Avenue from the south project boundary with a minimum appropriate plans
36-foot two-way paved access to the project in conjunction or reports prior to
with development of the proposed project or as determined by permit issuance.
the Development Agreement with the City.
TT-5:The project applicant shall construct East Avenue from CE A Review C/D 2/3
the north project boundary to Wilson Avenue to provide 44- appropriate plans
foot two-way paved access and the full shoulder(curb,gutter, or reports prior to
street lights, and side walks) on west side of the street in permit issuance.
conjunction with development of the proposed project or as
determined by the Development Agreement with the City.
TT-6:The project applicant shall construct Etiwanda Avenue CE A Review C/D 2/3
from the north project boundary to Golden Prairie Drive at its appropriate plans
ultimate half-section width as a Secondary Arterial (96 ft. or reports prior to
Right-of-way) in conjunction with development of the permit issuance.
proposed project or as determined by the Development
Agreement with the City.
TT-7: Priorto issuance of building permits,the applicant shall CE A Prior to permit D 2
provide funds in accordance with the City's Transportation issuance.
Development Fee. Collection of these fees shall represent
the project's 'lair-share' toward the following transportation
improvements required for opening year(Year 2004):
• Installation of a traffic signal at Etiwanda Avenue at Banyan
Street.
• Installation of a traffic signal at East Avenue at Banyan Street.
Construction of a southbound right turn lane at the
intersection of Etiwanda Avenue at Highland Avenue.
12 of 13
Mitigation Measures No. Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verif led Sanctions for
Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance
TT-8: Prior to the issuance of building permits,the applicant CE A Prior to permit D 2
shall provide funds in accordance with the City's issuance.
Transportation Development Fee. Collection of these fees
shall represent the project's'lair share"toward the following
transportation improvements required for Buildout Year2020.
• Construction of one additional northbound lane to provide a
shared left and through lane, and a shared right and through
northbound lane,and one additional southbound lane to provide
a shared left and through and a shared right and through
southbound lane on East Avenue at Banyan Street.
• Construction of a westbound through lane on Highland Avenue
at Etiwanda Avenue.
• Installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Etiwanda
Avenue(North)at Wilson Avenue.
• Installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Etiwanda
Avenue(South)at Wilson Avenue.
Installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of East
Avenue at Wilson Avenue.
Key to Checklist Abbreviations
Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification Sanctions
CDD-Community Development Director or designee A-With Each New Development A-On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map
CP-City Planner or designee B-Prior To Construction B-Other Agency Permit/Approval 2-Withhold Grading or Building Permit
CE-City Engineer or designee C-Throughout Construction C-Plan Check 3-Withhold Certificate of Occupancy
BO-Building Official or designee D-On Completion D-Separate Submittal(Reports/Studies/Plans) 4-Stop Work Order
PO-Police Captain or designee E-Operating 5-Retain Deposit or Bonds
FC-Fire Chiet or designee 6-Revoke CUP
7-Citation
13 of 13
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
in .
DEPARTMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
PROJECT#: SUBTT16072
SUBJECT: RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION
APPLICANT: RICHLAND PINEHURST, INC.
LOCATION: NORTH OF WILSON AVENUE, BETWEEN ETIWANDA AND EAST AVENUES
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION,(909)477-2750,FOR COMPLIANCE
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
A. General Requirements Completion Date
1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its
agents,officers,or employees,because of the issuance of such approval,or in the alternative,to
relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or
employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or
employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may,at its sole
discretion,participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation
shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition.
2. Approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16072 is granted subject to the approval of Annexation _/_/_
DRC2002-00865.
3. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 04-56, Standard
Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The
sheet(s)are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and
are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect.
B. Time Limits
1. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning
Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the
date of the approval.
C. Site Development
1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include
site plans,architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors,landscaping,sign program,and
grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code
regulations and, the Etiwanda North Specific Plan.
1
Project No. SUBTT16072
Completion Date
2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon,all Conditions
of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and
State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be
submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division
to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy.
4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits.
5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for
consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment,
building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision,or approved
use has commenced, whichever comes first.
6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code,all
other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the
time of building permit issuance.
7. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided,all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with
all receptacles shielded from public view.
S. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be
located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete
or masonry walls, berming,and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. For single-
family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults.
9. Street names shall.be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the
adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map.
10. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed
control,in accordance with City Master Trail drawings,shall be submitted for City Planner review
and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of
street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails,including
fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements.
a. Local Feeder Trails (i.e., private equestrian easements) shall, at a minimum, be fenced
with two-rail,4-inch lodgepole"peeler"logs to define both sides of the easement;however,
developer may upgrade to an alternate fence material.
b. Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles, such as
veterinarians or hay deliveries, including a 12-foot minimum drive approach. Entrance
shall be gated provided that equestrian access is maintained through step-throughs.
C. Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0.5% at the downstream end of a trail for a
distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching
the street. Drainage devices may be required by the Building Official
d. Provide a 24-foot by 24-foot corral area in the rear yard. Grade access from corral to trail
with a maximum slope of 5:1 and a minimum width of 10 feet.
e. For single family residential development within the Equestrian/Rural Overlay District, at
least one model home shall be provided with a constructed 24-foot by 24-foot corral with
appropriate fencing.
11. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the
Homeowners'Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions
and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the
issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the
City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Division a list of the
name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever
said information changes.
2
Project No. SUBTT16072
Completion Date
12. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property
owner, homeowners'association,or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape
maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to
the issuance of building permits.
13. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all
lots for City Planner and City Engineer approval; including, but not limited to, public notice
requirements,special street posting,phone listing for community concerns,hours of construction
activity, dust control measures, and security fencing.
14. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall
condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining
property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail,all contiguous property
owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's
perimeter.
15. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry.
16. For single family residential development, a 2-inch galvanized pipe shall be attached to each _J_/_
support post for all wood fences,with a minimum of two Y2-inch lag bolts,to withstand high winds.
Both post and pipe shall be installed in an 18-inch deep concrete footing. Pipe shall extend at
least 4 feet, 6 inches above grade.
17. Wood fencing shall be treated with stain, paint, or water sealant.
18. Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought iron or black plastic coated chain link to
maintain an open feeling and enhance views.
19. On corner side yards,provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The
5-foot walVfence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the
required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for City Planner
review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. The parkway landscaping including
trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The
developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance
requirement, in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash
deposit on any property.
20. Where rock cobble is used,it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured
products.
D. Building Design
1. For all residential development, provide conduit from each unit/lot and a pull box to connect to the
street. Provide interior structured wiring for each house/building with minimum Category 5
copper wire, Radio Grade 6 coaxial cable, and a central distribution panel, prior to release of
occupancy(fiber-to-the building, FTTB). Plans shall be submitted for City Planner and Building
Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
E. Landscaping
1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in --/--J—
the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior
final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision.
2. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope,but less than 2:1
slope,shall be,at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion
control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be
installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
3
Project No. SUBTT16072
Completion Date
3. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater
slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as
follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq.ft.of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size
shrub per each 100 sq.ft.of slope area,and appropriate ground cover. In addition,slope banks
in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or
larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in
staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall
include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
4. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously
maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold
and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be
conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition.
5. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required. This requirement
shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting.
6. The final design of the perimeter parkways,walls,landscaping,and sidewalks shall be included in
the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and
coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the
Engineering Division.
7. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the
perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer.
8. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas,the
design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division.
9. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of
Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code.
F. Environmental
1. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock
Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner,prior to accepting a cash
deposit on any property.
2. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted Special _J_J_
Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault,in a standard format as determined by the City Planner,prior
to accepting a cash deposit on any property.
3. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the 210 and 1-15 Freeways
in a standard format as determined by the City Planner,prior to accepting a cash deposit on any
property.
4. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of
implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to
post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the
amount of $719.00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory
performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds maybe used bythe Cityto
retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures.
Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be
considered grounds for forfeit.
G. Other Agencies
1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location
of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for
mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the
overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of
building permits.
4
Project No. SUBTT16072
Completion Date
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION,(909)477-2710, FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S)
H. General Requirements
1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following:
a. Site/Plot Plan;
b. Foundation Plan;
C. Floor Plan;
d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan;
e. Electrical Plans (2 sets,detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size
of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams;
f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams,water and waste
diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air
conditioning; and
g. Planning Division Project Number(i.e.,SUBTT#,SUBTPM#, DRC#)clearly identified on
the outside of all plans.
2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report.
Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet"signature are required prior to plan check submittal.
3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers'Compensation coverage to
the City prior to permit issuance.
4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls.
5. Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can _/_/_
contact the Building and Safety Division staff for information and submittal requirements.
I. Site Development
1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be ---J--/—
marked with the project file number(i.e., DRC2001-00001). The applicant shall comply with the
latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in
effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of
the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts.
2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential project or major addition,the applicant
shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include,but are not limited to:
City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and
Plan Check Fees,Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School
Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division
prior to permit issuance.
3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map
recordation and prior to issuance of building permits.
4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 5:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday
through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays.
5
Project No. SUBTT16072
Completion Date
J. New Structures
1. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions.
2. Roofing materials shall be Class "A."
K. Grading
1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code,City Grading
Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial
conformance with the approved grading plan.
2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_/_
perform such work.
3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the
time of application for grading plan check.
4. The final grading, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed,
submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building
permits.
5. As a custom-lot subdivision,the following requirements shall be met:
a. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all on-site
drainage facilities necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building
and Safety Official prior to final map approval and prior to the issuance of grading permits.
b. Appropriate easements for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducted onto or over
adjacent parcels,are to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the Building and
Safety Official prior to the issuance of grading and building permits.
C. On-site drainage improvements, necessary for dewatering and protecting the subdivided
properties, are to be installed prior to issuance of building permits for construction upon
any parcel that may be subject to drainage flows entering, leaving, or within a parcel
relative to which a building permit is requested.
d. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Division _/_J_
for approval prior to the issuance of grading and building permits (this may be on an
incremental or composite basis).
e. All slope banks in excess of 5 feet in vertical height shall be seeded with native grasses or
planted with ground cover for erosion control upon completion of grading or some other
alternative method of erosion control shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Building
and Safety Official. In addition, a permanent irrigation system shall be provided. This
requirement does not release the applicant/developer from compliance with the slope
planting requirements of Section 17.08.040 of the Development Code.
6. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for
existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of
combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California
registered Civil Engineer.
6
Project No. SUBTT16072
Completion Date
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
L. Dedication and Vehicular Access
1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets,
community trails,public paseos, public landscape areas,street trees,traffic signal encroachment
and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map.
Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be
reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map.
2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets(measured from
street centerline):
44 total feet on Wilson Avenue.
33 total feet on East Avenue (42 feet north of Street"N")
52 total feet on Etiwanda Avenue.
3. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards.
4. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or
noted on the final map.
5. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the
final map.
6. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be
dedicated to the City.
7. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests
necessary to construct the required public improvements,and if he/she should fail to do so,the
developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an
agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Sections 66462 and
66462.5 at such time as the City decides to acquire the property interests required for the
improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred
by the City if the City decides to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with
the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the
amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the City,at developer's cost. The appraiser shall
have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. This condition applies
in particular, but not limited to: Wilson. Etiwanda, and East Avenue.
M. Street Improvements
1. All public improvements(interior streets,drainage facilities,community trails,paseos,landscaped
areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards.
Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to,curb and gutter,AC pavement,
drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees.
2. Pursuant to City Council Resolution No.88-557,no person shall make connections from a source
of energy,fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes
and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and
ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been
completed and accepted by the City Council,except:that in developments containing more than
one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of
those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by
conditions of approval of development. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or
units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by
these conditions of approval of development.
7
Project No. SUBTT16072
Completion Date
3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to:
Curb& A.C. Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median BAOther
Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island TWilson Avenue X X (c) X X (a)Etiwanda Avenue X X X X X East Avenue X (e) X X X (g) (
Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement
reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk
shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be
provided for this item. (e) Plus 14 feet east of the centerline. (f) Between Wilson Avenue and
25th Street provide 34-foot paved roadway for two-way traffic and north/south bike lanes. (g)
North of Street "N." (h) Traffic striping/signage (R26).
4. Improvement Plans and Construction:
a. Street improvement plans, including street trees,street lights,and intersection safety lights
on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil
Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be
posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City
Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements,prior to
final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first.
b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a
construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any
other permits required.
C. Pavement striping,marking,traffic signing,street name signing,traffic signal conduit,and
interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction
project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and
interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside
of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer
Notes:
1) Pull boxes shall be No.6 at intersections and No.5 along streets,a maximum of 200
feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer.
2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified.
e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City
Standards or as directed by the City Engineer.
f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with
adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash
deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving,which shall be refunded
upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be
installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots.
h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check.
5. Street improvement plans per City Standards for all private streets shall be provided for review
and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being performed on the private streets,fees
shall be paid and construction permits shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in
addition to any other permits required.
8
Project No. SUBTT16072
Completion Date
6. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in
accordance with the City's street tree program.
7. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed
legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street
improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction
legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically
sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be
per the public landscape improvement plans.
The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other
variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer.
Min.
Grow
Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Ory.
East Avenue pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 8 ft. 25 ft.o.c 15 gal. Fill
60%(Background) Cercis occidentalis Western Redbud 3 ft. 20 ft.o.c. 15 gal. In
30%(Foreground)
10%(Accent) Sophora japonica Japanese Pagoda Tree 5 ft. 30 ft.o.c. 15 gal.
Wilson Avenue
60%(Background) Cercis occidentalis Western Redbud 3 ft. 20 ft.o.c. 15 gal. Fill
Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 8 ft. 25 ft.o.c. 15 gal. In
30%(Foreground) Pyrus calleryana Bradford Pear 3 ft. 20 ft.o.c. 15 gal.
10%(Accent) 'Bradford*
Etiwanda Avenue
60%(Background) Pinus canadensis Canary Island Pine 8 ft. 25 ft.o.c. 15 gal. Fill
Cercis occidentalis Western Redbud 3 ft. 20 ft.o.c. 15 gal. In
30%(Foreground) Sophora japonica Japanese Pagoda Tree 5 ft. 30 ft.o.c. 15 gal.
10%(Accent)
All other streets,
provide street Select a street from the handout,following the guidelines for each street.
names
Construction Notes for Street Trees:
1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans.
2) Prior to the commencement of any planting,an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to
the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil
amendments, as determined by the City inspector.
3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division.
4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only.
8. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with
adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project
intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or
industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required.
N. Public Maintenance Areas
1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall
be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance
of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscaped parkways, medians,
paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance
District: Wilson Avenue, Etiwanda Avenue, slopes along the trail south of Etiwanda Avenue,
Street "A" entry only. and fault trail.
2. Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas ( % of mortared cobble
or other acceptable non-irrigated surfaces.
9
Project No. SUBTT16072
Completion Date
3. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting
Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building
permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer.
4. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the
developer until accepted by the City.
5. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective
Beautification Master Plan Etiwanda North Special Plan for Wilson. Etiwanda,and East Avenues.
O. Drainage and Flood Control
1. It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone designation
removed from the project area. The developer shall provide drainage and/or flood protection
facilities sufficient to obtain an unshaded "X" designation. The developer's engineer shall
prepare all necessary reports, plans,and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter
of Map Revision(CLOMR)shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance
of building permits,whichever occurs first. A Letter of Map Revision(LOMB)shall be issued by
FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first.
2. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map
approval or the issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall
be installed as required by the City Engineer.
3. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the
property from adjacent areas.
4. A permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District is required for work within its
right-of-way.
5. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured
from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk.
6. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a blockage in a
sump catch basin on the public street, and provisions made to pass through walls.
P. Utilities
1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system,water,gas,
electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility
Standards. Easements shall be provided as required.
2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary.
3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the
Cucamonga County Water District(CCW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District,and the
Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from
the CCW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits,whichever occurs first.
Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval
in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential
projects.
10
Project No. SUBTT16072
completion Date
4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved.
Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from
them.
0. General Requirements and Approvals
1: Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline,Secondary Regional,and Master Plan Drainage
Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is
involved.
2. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right of-way: San
Bernardino County, MWD, SCE, and SBCFCD.
3. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the Law Enforcement Community Facilities
District shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building
permits, whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the Developer.
4. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City,covering the estimated operating costs for all
new streetlights for the first six months of operation,prior to final map approval or prior to building
permit issuance if no map is involved.
5. Prior to finalization of any development phase,sufficient improvement plans shall be completed
beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer. Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the
approved tentative map.
6. Prior to the issuance of building permits,a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall
be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if
at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from
landfills,and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to
the Engineering Division when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and
Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Division within 60 days following the
completion of the construction and/or demolition project.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING
SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
SEE ATTACHED
11
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
FIRE SAFETY DIVISION
Standard Conditions
PROJECT#: SUBTT16072
PROJECT NAME: Richland Pinehurst, Inc
DATE: May 6 2004
PLAN TYPE: ER and Tentative Tract Map Review
APPLICANT NAME: MDS Consulting Stan Morse
OCCUPANCY R-3
FIRE PROTECTION
SYSTEM REQUIRED: Fuel Modification approved
LOCATION: North of Wilson btw Etiwanda and East
FD REVIEW BY: Moises Eskenazi, Sr. Plans Examiner
FSC-1 General Requirements for Public and Private Water Supply
1. General Guidance for Fire Hydrants: The following provides general guidance for the spacing and
location of fire hydrants. Remember these are the maximum permitted distances between fire hydrants:
a. For single-family residential projects in the designated Hazardous Fire Area the maximum
distance between fire hydrants is 400-feet. No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed
street shall be more than 200-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs the distance
shall not exceed 150 ft.
b. Fire hydrants are to be located:
1. At the entrance(s)to a project from the existing public roadways. This includes subdivisions
and industrial parks.
2. At intersections.
3. On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible.
4. As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs.
5. The location of fire hydrants is based upon the operational needs of the Fire District to control
a fire.
6. Fire hydrants shall be located a minimum of 40 feet from any building.
2. Minimum Fire Flow: The required fire flow for this project is 1750 gallons per minute at a minimum
residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code
Appendix III-A, as amended. Please see "Water Availability" attachment for required verification of fire
flow availability for the proposed project.
3. Single-family Dwellings: The minimum fire flow for one and two-family dwellings with a fire area (floor
area measured in square feet)of 3600 square feet or less shall be 1000 gallons per minute. The fire flow
for dwellings having a fire area in excess of 3600 square feet shall be determined in accordance with Fire
Code Appendix, Table A-III-A-1.
4. Hazardous Fire Area: The required minimum fire flow for structures located in the designated hazardous
fire area shall be not less than 1750 gpm at 20 p.s.i. residual. For structures in excess of 3600 square feet
use Table A-III-A-1. This flow may be reduced when the structure is protected by an approved automatic
fire sprinkler system.
5. Hydrants Used to Supply Fire Flow: Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the
proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval.
Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow.
6. Show Existing Fire Hydrants and Mains: Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600-feet of the project
shall be shown on the water plan submitted for review and approval. Include main size.
FSC-5 Hazardous Fire Area
1. Designated Hazardous Fire Area: This project is located within the"State Responsibility Area"(SRA), the
"Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone"(VHFHSZ), City of Rancho Cucamonga"Hillside District,"or within the
area identified on the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, Exhibit V-7 as High Probability-High Consequence
for Fire Risk. These locations have been determined to be within the"Hazardous Fire Area"as defined by the
Fire District. This determination is based on maps produced by the California Department of Forestry and
Fire Protection and the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
2. Hazardous Fire Area Development: Hazardous Fire Area Development: Place a note on the plans
stating -Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall meet all requirements for development
and construction within the designated "Hazardous Fire Area" The minimum standard adopted by the Fire
District and the City of Rancho Cucamonga is contained in the County Fire Safety Overlay District Standards.
This standard includes provisions for the following:
a. Class A roof assemblies,
b. Fuel modification/hazard reduction plans,
c. Approved Fire District access roadways,
d. One-hour fire-resistive construction with protected openings may be required,
e. Fire sprinkler system may be required,
f. The required fire flow of minimum duration shall be provided from an on-site water supply.
g. Visit www co san-bernardino ca us/landuseservices/DevCode/805-Overlav%20Distric! pdf, for an
Adobe copy. The regulations are contained in Chapter 2- Hazard Protection, Article 2- Fire Safety
(FR) Overlay District.
3. Construction Standards: Summary of construction requirements for the Hazardous Fire Area:
a. The roof shall be a Class A fire-resistive assembly approved by Building and Safety. Fire-
retardant Class A wood shakes and shingles shall have completed a 10-year"natural"weathering
test. Class A roof assemblies shall be installed in accordance with their listing and manufacturer's
instructions.
b. The space between rafts at exterior walls shall be solidly filled with tight-fitting wood blocks at one
and one-half(1-1/2) inches thick. May be "boxed."
c. The exposed surface of exterior wall must be listed as one-hour fire-resistive construction.
d. All exterior doors must be solid core or wood portions shall be solid core wood.
e. All windows, sliding glass doors or glass insets in does shall be constructed of approved dual-
pane glass.
f. Cantilevered or standard type desks shall be constructed of 1.) A minimum of at least one and
one-half(1-1/2) inch wood deck; and/or 2.) Protected on the underside by materials approved for
one (one) hour fire-resistive construction; and/or 3.) Be of non-combustible materials, as defined
in the Building Code.
g. Patio covers attached or within 10-feet of a residential structure shall be constructed of materials
not less than one-half(1/2) inch. Plastic, bamboo, straw, fiberglass, or wood-lattice less than
one-half(1/2) inch are not permitted.
h. All required fences adjacent to fuel modification areas or wildland areas as conditions of approval
for a project shall be of non-combustible materials as defined in the Building Code. Any fence
within 10-feet of the fuel modification area or wildland area shall be non-combustible. Beyond 10-
feet the may be constructed of any approved material. All other fences, including those on the
interior of the project are not subject to this requirement.
i. Visit www.co.san-bernardino.ca.us/landuseservices/DevCode/805-Overlav°/u2ODistricts odf, for an
Adobe copy. The regulations are contained in Chapter 2- Hazard Protection, Article 2- Fire Safety
(FR) Overlay District.
Review the County Fire Safety Overlay District standard for complete requirements. Contact the Fire Safety
Division (909)477-2770
4 Perimeter Roadway Required: A roadway shall be provided along the project perimeter exposed to a fire
hazard or fuel modified area. The roadway is to allow fire district vehicle access. Such roadway shall be a
minimum twenty(20)feet in width, with a grade not to exceed fourteen percent(14%), and capable of
supporting fire fighting vehicles. Contact the Fire Safety Division at(909)477-2770, Extension 3009,for
specific requirements.
5. Power-operated Equipment Use in a Hazardous Fire Area: Submit a "Fire Prevention and Control Plan"
to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Fire Safety Division for review and approval. The plan
shall include job location, specific fire tools to be maintained on-site, person(s) responsible for supervising
the project (on-site), method of reporting a fire (cell phone, etc.), City or County Permit Number,
contractors license number, address, telephone number, etc.
6. Fire District Approval Required for Equipment Use: No power-operated equipment, including mobile,
stationary, or portable, shall be used without Fire Safety Division written approval.
7. Combustible Vegetation: During the declared "fire season" or at any other time when ground litter and
vegetation will sustain combustion permitting the spread of fire, contact the Fire Protection District during
normal business hours to determine if"special fire protection measures"are required to operate power
equipment. Call (909)477-2770, Monday through Thursday, between 7:00 AM and 5:00 PM. The
purpose of the call is to determine if extreme fire weather conditions are present or expected to occur.
8. Special Fire Protection Required: "Special fire protection measures' include, but are not limited to;
a. A stand-by water tender with operating pump; tested and maintained fire hose and nozzles.
b. Pre-wetting of the site to avoid the production of sparks, i.e., contact between blades or tracks and
rocks, etc.
c. The Fire District requires the contractor to maintain a firewatch for a minimum of one-hour following
cessation of operations each da .
d. For welding, cutting or grinding clear away all flammable material from the area around such
operation for a minimum distance of 10-feet. A"hot-work' permit will be required.
e. Maintain one serviceable round point shovel with an overall length of not less than forty-six (46)
inches and one five (5) gallon backpack water pump-type fire extinguisher fully equipped and ready
for use at the immediate area during the operation.
FSC-6 Fuel Modification/Hazard Reduction Plan (Required Notes for All Maps and Plans)
A.1.a.1. Hazardous Fire Area: This project is located in the"Hazardous Fire Area"based on
proximity to or exposure urban—wildland interface. Mitigation measures are required. The building(s) shall be
constructed in accordance with the standards contained in the San Bernardino County Fire Safety Overlay
District-Area FR-1 or Area FR-2.
A.1.a.2. Required Landscaping Plans: Landscaping plans shall be submitted to the Fire
Safety Division for review of proposed vegetation. All groundcover, shrubs, plants, and trees are required to
be fire-resistive in accordance with three (3) published references. Refer to the following web site
http://www.ucfpl.ucop.edu/I-Zone/XIV/vegetati.htm for additional information. The plant palette shall
include the common name for all vegetation. The landscaping plan shall identify all native species proposed
for retention.
A.1.a.3. Preliminary Fuel Modification Plan: Prior to the issuance of a preliminary grading the
applicant shall obtain the Fire District approval of a preliminary fuel modification/hazard reduction plan and
program. The plan(s)shall be prepared by an individual or firm qualified and experienced in wildfire hazard
mitigation planning.
a. Show all property lines, contour lines, locations of proposed buildings or structures,
b. Show the 30-foot minimum defensible space for slopes less than 15% and 100-feet for slope 15% or
more (Zone 1- Setback Zone)around the perimeter of each building or structure.
c. Show each fuel modification zone (setback, irrigated, thinning, and interface thinning).
d. Show existing vegetation impacted by the required fuel modification and, if available, proposed
vegetation to be planted in the fuel modification area. The preliminary plans should be sensitive to
rare, threatened, or endangered species and the applicant must be prepared to address their
disposition in the final plans.
e. Include photographs of the area that show the type of vegetation currently existing; include height and
density; and relationship to grade.
f. Describe the fuel modification methods to be used for vegetation removal, if appropriate, i.e.,
mechanical or manual.
g. Describe on the plan what exists up to not less than 600-feet beyond the site or development property
line in all directions, i.e., built-up area, natural vegetation, roads, parks, green space, etc. State on the
plan who will have ultimate responsibility for maintenance of fuel modification zones.
A.1.a.4. Final Fuel Modification Plan: Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the
applicant shall obtain Fire District approval of a final fuel modification/hazard reduction plan and program.
The plan shall indicate the proposed means of achieving an acceptable level of risk to the structures by
vegetation.
a. Show each fuel modification zone (setback, irrigated, thinning, and interface thinning). Indicate
locations of permanent zone identification markers.
b. Include irrigation plans and specifications.
c. Attach a landscape plan. The landscape plan must identify the location and type of supplemental
plantings. The plans and specifications shall include both the common and botanical names of
new and existing plants within the fuel modification area. Clearly indicate on the plans the
disposition of impacted existing vegetation.
d. The landscape plan shall include any special or specific maintenance intended for the site such
as pruning, "limbing" up, mowing, etc.
e. Describe the fuel modification methods to be used for vegetation removal, if appropriate, i.e.,
mechanical or manual.
f. Describe on the plan what exists up to not less than 600-feet beyond the site or development
property line in all directions, i.e., built-up area, natural vegetation, roads, parks, green space, etc.
g. State on the plan who will ultimate responsibility for maintenance of fuel modification zones.
h. Include on the title sheet any tract/project conditions of approval, CC&R's, and/or deed
restrictions related to the site or final fuel modification area. Include a copy of the approved
preliminary fuel modification plans with this submittal.
i. Provide an appropriate recorded document filed with the County Recorder showing continued
maintenance responsibility in the event of property transfer, change in membership of directors,
change in CC&R's.
j. Maintenance responsibility requirements and appropriate recorded document filed with the
County Recorder
A.1.a.5. Initial Inspection: Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the developer shall have
completed, in cooperation with the Fire District, that portion of the approved fuel modification/hazard
reduction plan determined to be necessary by the Fire District, before the introduction of any combustible
materials into the project area. Approval is subject to final on-site inspection.
6. Final Inspection and Documentation: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of
Occupancy,the remainder of the fuel modification/hazard reduction plan shall be installed. The Fire
District shall inspect and approve the completed fuel modification areas. Further, the installed fuel
modification plant pallet shall be established to a degree meeting the approval of the Fire District. The
CC&R's shall contain provisions for maintaining the fuel modification zones, including the removal of all
dead and dying vegetation subject to(annual)triennial inspections.
7. Phased or Temporary Plans: Phased projects or temporary fuel modification
plans must meet the requirements for permanent plans and be approved by the Fire District.
8. Single-family In-fill Projects: For a single-family dwelling project located in the
Hazardous Fire Area, a simplified landscaping/fuel modification plan may be acceptable. The plan shall
detail the defensible space. Provide a minimum 30-foot space for slopes less than 15%and a minimum
one hundred (100)feet space for slopes of 15% or more. Show proposed and/or existing vegetation. Refer
to the following web site for further information- http://www.ucfpl.ucoD.edu/I-Zone/XIV/vegetati.htm. The
Fire District can provide a single page sheet of standardized notes for inclusion on the construction plans.
FSC-7 Single-family Residential Sales Models
1. Minimum Access and Water: Residential sales model homes require approved Fire District vehicle
access and water supply from a public or private water main system.
FSC-12 Plan Submittal Required Notice
Required plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1997/98 Building,
Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes; 1999 Electrical Code; Health and Safety Code; Public Resources
Code; and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32, Guidelines and Standards.
NOTE: In addition to the fees due at this time please note that separate plan check fees for tenant
improvements,fire protection systems and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed at time of submittal of
plans.
FSC-14 Alternate Materials and Methods
The Fire Safety Division will review requests for alternate materials and methods within the scope of our
authority. The request must be submitted on the Fire District"Application for Alternate Method"form along with
supporting documents.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMIT- For Each Development Phase
1. Preliminary Fuel Modification Plan: Prior to the issuance of a preliminary grading permit, the applicant shall
obtain the Fire District approval of a preliminary fuel modification/hazard reduction plan and program. The
plan(s)shall be prepared by an individual or firm qualified and experienced in wildfire hazard mitigation
planning.
a. Show all property lines, contour lines, locations of proposed buildings or structures,
b. Show the 30-foot minimum defensible space for slopes less than 15% and 100-feet for slope 15%
or more (Zone 1- Setback Zone) around the perimeter of each building or structure.
c. Show existing vegetation impacted by the required fuel modification and, if available, proposed
vegetation to be planted in the fuel modification area. The preliminary plans should be sensitive
to rare, threatened, or endangered species and the applicant must be prepared to address their
disposition in the final plans.
d. Include photographs of the area that show the type of vegetation currently existing; include height
and density; and relationship to grade.
e. Describe the fuel modification methods to be used for vegetation removal, if appropriate, i.e.,
mechanical or manual.
f. Describe on the plan what exists up to not less than 600-feet beyond the site or development
property line in all directions, i.e., built-up area, natural vegetation, roads, parks, green space, etc.
g. State on the plan who will have ultimate responsibility for maintenance of fuel modification zones.
2. Model Homes -Required Plans: Prior to issuance of any grading permit please identify the lots selected for
construction of residential sales models on a scaled site plan. Include the location of required fire hydrants
and fire district access roadways. The site plan shall be submitted to the Fire Safety Division for approval.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS- Complete the following:
1. Public Fire Hydrants: Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan
showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District
and the Water District. On the plan show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the
project.
2. Public Installation: All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to
delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i.e., lumber, roofing materials, etc.). Water
District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing. The builder/developer
shall submit a copy of the Water District inspection report to the Fire Safety Division. Contact Water
District to schedule testing.
3. Hazardous Fire Area Construction: The building or project is located within the designated
Hazardous Fire Area. All buildings and structures shall be constructed in accordance with the
provisions of County Fire Safety Review Area standards. In the Hazardous Fire Area the applicant
shall provide a modified one-hour fire-resistive wall for the following exterior wall(s) based on
exposure to unmodified native vegetation or potential exposure to embers or debris from a wind-
driven fire: For this proposed map lot 212 through lot 250 inclusive the following sides shall be
constructed of one-hour modified fire-resistive construction:
a. North Side-
b. East Side-
c. West Side-
No vent openings are permitted on or in building components or surfaces that are parallel to any wall
required to be constructed of modified one-hour fire-resistive construction.
4. Hazardous Fire Area Development: Hazardous Fire Area Development: Place a note on the plans
stating -Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall meet all requirements for
development and construction within the designated"Hazardous Fire Area." The minimum standard
adopted by the Fire District and the City of Rancho Cucamonga is contained in the County Fire Safety
Overlay District Standards. This standard includes provisions for the following:
a. Class A roof assemblies;
b. Fuel modification/hazard reduction plans;
c. Approved Fire District access roadways;
d. One-hour fire-resistive construction for exterior walls may be required;
e. The required fire flow of minimum duration shall be provided from the public water system or
an on-site water supply.
5. Architectural Plans-Single-family Residential Hazardous Fire Area: Prior to the issuance of a
building permit the applicant shall submit architectural plans for the review and approval of the Fire Safety
Division. The Fire Safety Division review is intended to ensure that conditions established during the
development review have been included in the design of the project. Contact the Fire Safety Division
(909)477-2770
6. Fuel Modification Plan-Initial Inspection: Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the developer shall
have completed, in cooperation with the Fire District, that portion of the approved fuel modification/hazard
reduction plan determined to be necessary by the Fire District before the introduction of any combustible
materials into the project area. Approval is subject to final on-site inspection.
7. Building Use Letter-Required Letter: Prior to the issuance of any building permits,the applicant shall
submit a detailed letter of intended use for each building on-site to the Fire District for review and
approval. A form that may be used to meet this requirement is attached at the end of the Fire District
comments. Provide a separate letter for each building or structure with storage use areas.
8. Combustible Construction Letter-Required Letter: Prior to the issuance of a building permit for
combustible construction, the builder shall submit a letter to the Fire District on company letterhead
stating that the minimum water supply for fire fighting purposes and the all-weather fire protection access
roadway that meets Fire District Standards shall be in place and operational before any combustible
material is placed on-site. The roadway shall be maintained at all times.
PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION- Complete the following:
1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire
hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection
District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective
Hydrant Markers." On private property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the
property owner.
1. Address Single-family: New single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch
numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during
periods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street. When building setback from the
public roadway exceeds 100 feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry.
2. Required Landscaping Plans: Landscaping plans shall be submitted to the Fire Safety Division for
review of proposed vegetation. All groundcover, shrubs, plants, and trees are required to be fire-resistive
in accordance with at least three(3)published references. Refer to the following web site for additional
information- http://www.ucfpl.ucop.edu/I-Zone/XIV/vegetati.htm. The plant palette shall include the
common name for all vegetation. The landscaping plan shall identify all native species proposed for
retention.
3. Fuel Modification Plan-Final Inspection and Documentation: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate
of Occupancy,the remainder of the fuel modification/hazard reduction plan shall be installed. The Fire
District shall inspect and approve the completed fuel modification areas. Further, the installed fuel
modification plant pallet shall be established to a degree meeting the approval of the Fire District. The
CC&R's shall contain provisions for maintaining the fuel modification zones, including the removal of all
dead and dying vegetation subject to(annual)triennial inspections.
Items or Issues Not Identified Elsewhere
1. Provide a revised copy of approved vegetation management and fuel modification plans. Include
details for a minimum of 600-feet beyond subdivision boundaries.