Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-77 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 04-77 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVALOF GENERAL PLAN LAND USE AMENDMENT DRC2003-00410, FROM VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (.1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND RESOURCE CONSERVATION, FOR APPROXIMATELY 168.77 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED NORTH OF THE SCE CORRIDOR BETWEEN ETIWANDA AVENUE AND EAST AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0225-083-05, 06, 07, 10, 22, 23, 25, AND 26 AND 0225-084-02. A. Recitals. 1. Traigh Pacific filed an application for General Plan Amendment DRC2003-00410, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 9th day of June 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. 4. The Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the associated Environmental Impact Report prepared for said project. 5. By Resolution No. 04-75, the Planning Commission has certified the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for the project as being in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(Public Resources Code Section 21000 at seq.)for purposes of taking action on the Tentative Tract Map and has recommended that the City Council certify the EIR for purposes of taking action on the related General Plan Amendment. B. Resolution. NOW,THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the facts and information contained in the record of this project,the Planning Commission makes the following findings and statements, and takes the following actions, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seg.): a. The Project that has been evaluated under CEQA involves a series of actions related to the annexation of land from unincorporated San Bernardino County into the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the approval of a General Plan Amendment, Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment, Tentative Tract Map No. 14749 ('TTM 14749") and the associated Development Agreement. The proposed project includes 269 single-family housing units on approximately 168.8 acres and includes a 3.1 acre neighborhood park, 2.7 acre equestrian park, .44 acre equestrian trail, and 61.5 acres of remainder lots for flood control purposes. The gross density of the project is approximately 1.59 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-77 GPA DRC2003-00410 —TRAIGH PACIFIC June 9, 2004 Page 2 dwelling units per acre, a net density of 2.5 units per acre, a minimum lot size of 8,400 square feet, and an average lot size of 11,600 square feet. b. The City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, prepared the Draft Environmental Impact Report ("Draft EIR") for the Project (State Clearinghouse No. 2003081085). The Draft EIR was circulated for a 45-day public review and comment period from December5,2003 through January 28, 2004. Comments were received during that period and written responses were prepared and sent to all commentors. Those comments and the responses thereto have been included in the Final EIR, as have the appendices to the Draft EIR. Those documents together comprise the Final EIR. C. The Planning Commission finds that the Final EIR was completed pursuant to the CEQA, and the State Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA, 14 California Code of Regulations, Section 15000, at. seq. ("the Guidelines"). By Resolution No. 04-75,the Planning Commission has certified the EIR as being in compliance with the requirements of the CEQA. d. The Planning Commission finds that the Final EIR was presented to the Planning Commission and that the Planning Commission reviewed and considered the information in the Final EIR and has reached its own conclusions with respect to the Project and as to whether and how to recommend approval of various components of the project approvals before makings its recommendation in this Resolution. e. The Planning Commission finds that the Final EIR represents the'independent judgment of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and adequately addresses the impacts of the Project and imposes appropriate mitigation measures for the Project. f. The Planning Commission finds, based upon the Initial Study,the Final EIR, public comments, public agency comments, and the entire record before it, that the Project may create significant impacts in the areas of Earth Resources; Water Resources;Transportation/Circulation;Air Quality, Biological Resources, Hazards, Noise, Public Services, Utilities, Aesthetics, and Cultural Resources. The proposed project will also contribute incrementally to cumulatively considerable impacts related to land use, flood control, water quality from urban runoff, loss of alluvial fan sage scrub, hazardous material dumping, congestion of evacuation routes, overcrowded schools, inadequate utilities, and loss of views. With respect to the impacts to all of these resources and services, the EIR identifies mitigation measures for each of those impacts that will substantially lessen the impacts. g. Implementation of mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR will substantially mitigate many of the environmental impacts described in paragraph f of this Section, to the extent feasible, as described in Exhibit "A" of Resolution No. 04-75, which is incorporated herein by reference. The Final EIR also identifies significant adverse impacts that cannot be fully mitigated or avoided, including impacts from short-term impacts on air quality from construction-related emissions, long-term impacts on air quality from project emissions, and biological resources. h. The Final EIR describes a range of alternatives to the Project that might fulfill basic objectives of the Project. These alternatives include the required "No Project-No Development" alternative, and the "No Project—Open Space" alternative, the "Reduced Density" alternative, the Modified Site Plan (clustered)" alternative, and the "Rural Density" Alternative. As set forth in the Exhibit "A" of Resolution No. 04-75, the alternatives identified in the EIR are not feasible because they would not achieve the basic objectives of the Project or would do so only to a much smaller PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-77 GPA DRC2003-00410—TRAIGH PACIFIC June 9, 2004 Page 3 degree and, therefore, leave unaddressed the significant economic, infrastructure,and General Plan goals that the Project is intended to accomplish, and are thus infeasible due to social and economic considerations, and/or they are infeasible because they would not eliminate the adverse environmental impacts of the proposed Project. Accordingly,the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council find each of the alternatives is infeasible. i. Mitigation measures described in the Mitigation Monitoring Program will avoid or substantially lessen the potentially significant environmental effects of the Project. Further, the environmental, physical, social, economic and other benefits of the Project, as set forth in this Section and Resolution No. 04-75, and specifically Exhibit"A"thereto, which is incorporated herein by this reference, outweigh any unavoidable, significant, adverse impacts that may occur as a result of the Project, including short-term impacts on air quality from construction-related emissions, cumulative long-term impacts on air quality from project emissions, and impacts to biological resources. Therefore, due to overriding benefits of the Project and because the alternatives identified in the EIR are not feasible, as discussed in paragraph i above, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council find that any unavoidable impacts of the Project, including the mitigated but unavoidable impacts from short-term impacts on air quality from construction- related emissions, long-term impacts on air quality from project emissions, and impacts to biological resources are acceptable based on the findings contained herein and in Resolution No. 04-75 and the staff report, which are incorporated herein by this reference. This determination shall constitute the Planning Commission's recommendation to the City Council for a statement of overriding considerations within the meaning of CEQA and is based on any one of the following environmental and other benefits of the Project identified in the Final EIR and the record of the Planning Commission's proceedings: i. Providing for the use of land consistent with the established policies and goals of the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, Etiwanda North Specific Plan, City Development Code, and all other City Development guidelines; ii. Annexing the project site into the City of Rancho Cucamonga; iii. Integrating the project with the character of the surrounding neighborhoods and establish a development that results in logical, coordinated growth; iv. Establishing a project-wide circulation system that meets regional and local transportation needs and accommodates both vehicles and pedestrians; V. Providing a system of publictcommunity facilities, including trails,open space areas, and landscaping to support the residents of the project and surrounding area in an efficient and timely manner; vi. Limiting Impacts to surrounding uses and residents, and to the community character; vii. Providing backbone public infrastructure(i.e. roads, utilities)to serve project residents and the surrounding community; viii. Minimizing impacts to, and generate revenues in excess of costs for, various public service agencies, and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-77 GPA DRC2003-00410—TRAIGH PACIFIC June 9, 2004 Page 4 ix. Providing quality housing opportunities compatible with existing and planned development that responds to market demands. j. The Planning Commission recommends that the Mitigation Measures in the FINAL EIR that correspond to the environmental impacts which may result from the Project be adopted and made a condition of approval of, or incorporated into, the Project. The Planning Commission also recommends that the City Council adopt the"Mitigation Monitoring Plan"attached hereto as Exhibit "B." The Mitigation Monitoring Plan will be used to monitor compliance with the mitigation measures and conditions that have been adopted or made a condition of Project approval as set forth in this Section of this Resolution and Exhibit "B" of this Resolution. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on June 9, 2004, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 168.77 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located north of the SCE corridor between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue, and is presently vacant, undeveloped, land. Said property is currently designated as Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) and is proposed as Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and Resource Conservation as shown in Exhibit "A" attached; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Flood Control/Utility Corridor and Hillside Residential and is comprised of vacant land, utility corridors, and scattered single-family residences. The property to the southeast is designated Very Low Residential, Conservation and Flood Control/Utility Corridor and includes Etiwanda Creek Flood Control basins and conservation area. The property to the east is currently vacant and is designated Very Low Residential and Low Residential and is the site of Rancho Etiwanda and Rancho Etiwanda Estates. The property to the east is designated Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) and is the site of proposed Tentative Tract Map 16324 — Henderson Creek Properties. The property to the south is designated Flood Control/Utility Corridor, Conservation, and Very Low Residential and includes vacant land, and utility corridors and is the proposed site of Tentative Tract Map 16072— Richland Pinehurst; and C. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan, and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the land use element; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 4. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-77 GPA DRC2003-00410—TRAIGH PACIFIC June 9, 2004 Page 5 b. The proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and C. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 5. The Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the associated Environmental Impact Report prepared for said project. This Commission hereby recommends that the City Council make the following findings: a. The facts and findings set forth in the Statement of Facts and Findings are supported by substantial evidence in the administrative record and the Final EIR. b. The Final EIR has identified all significant physical environmental impacts of the project and there are no known potentially significant physically environmental impacts not addressed in the Final EIR. C. The significant physical impacts identified in the Final EIR, as a result of the project have been mitigated, avoided, or reduced to an acceptable level by the imposition of mitigation measures on the project. These mitigation measures are attached hereto as part of the Mitigation Monitoring Program and are incorporated herein by this reference. d. The EIR identified unavoidable project related impacts to short-term and long-term air quality as described in the Findings and the Final EIR; mitigation measures are incorporated into the project to reduce all other impacts to less than significant levels. The cumulative impacts of the project in relation to other projects in the area have been considered. The EIR identified unavoidable cumulative impacts as described in the Findings and the Final EIR related to land use, flood control, water quality from urban runoff, loss of alluvial fan sage scrub, hazardous material dumping, congestion of evacuation routes, overcrowded schools, inadequate utilities, and loss of views. 6. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3,4, and 5 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2003-00410. 7. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JUNE 2004. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: A ' LarrycNiel, Vice Chairman ATTEST: rad Bull et PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 04-77 GPA DRC2003-00410—TRAIGH PACIFIC June 9, 2004 Page 6 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day June 2004, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, McNIEL, McPHAIL, STEWART NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS 0 18.04 102.81 c huRyyp d d 9 1000 0 1000 2000 Feet mommomd ® PROPOSED LOW ® PROPOSED RESOURCE CONSERVATION GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT EXHIBIT "A,- DRC2003-00410 MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST Project File No.: _ SCH# 2003081085 Tract Development Project Applicant: Tracy Development Prepared by: Kent Norton — Michael Brandman Associates Date: April 28, 2004 ResponsibleMitigation Measures No. g of Method of Verified Sanctions for ActionImplementing Date/initials Non-Compliance 1.0 Land Use and Planning 1-1 Prior to recordation of each phase,or issuance of grading CP Prior to Recordation or C, D 1, 2 permits for each phase,the applicant shall submit and obtain recordation grading permit approval of a landscape.plan that demonstrates compliance or issuance issuance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Neighborhood Theme of grading Plan in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan,to the satisfaction of permits for the City Planning Department. each phase 2.0 Population and Housing None Required 3.0 Earth Resources 3-1 Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer BO B Prior to building C 2 shall demonstrate that each lot is buildable& complies with permit issuance the recommendations and general earthwork and grading specifications found in the RMA Group Geotechnical Investigation (DEIR Appendix C). This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the Building Official. 3-2 Prior to the issuance of grading permits and/or BO B Prior to grading C 1, 2 recordation of each phase, a detailed geologic and permit issuance geotechnical investigation shall be prepared and approved for and/or recordation the residential building areas and all roads. The report shall of each phase demonstrate that each lot is buildable and identify potential geologic and soil limitations and recommend appropriate engineering and design measures to adequately protect structures and inhabitants. This report shall also examine the drainage area adjacent to East Etiwanda Creek to identify potential landslide, erosion, or other slopes that could affect the residential area. Subsequent foundation and other design guidelines in these studies shall be consistent with the standards established in the RMA Group Geotechnical Investigation (DEIR Appendix C). This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Mitigation . . of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance 3.0 Earth Resources 3-3 Prior to the issuance of grading permits and/or BO B Prior to grading C 1,2 recordation, construction measures recommended by the permit issuance detailed geological investigation identified in Measure 3-2 and/or recordation shall be identified on grading plans and implemented to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 3-4 Prior to the issuance of a grading permit for each phase, BO BC Prior to grading A, C 2,4 the developer shall prepare and submit a Dust Control Plan to permit issuance the City that meets all applicable requirements of the for each phase SCAQMD. The Plan must be approved by the City Building and Safety Department, prior to issuance of the grading permit and demonstrate that methods are in place to assure the following: a)Areas disturbed by construction activities and/or used to store backfill materials, will be sprayed with water at least twice a day, in the morning and afternoon, or more often if fugitive dust is observed migrating from the site. b)Storage piles, which are to be left in place for more than three working days shall either be sprayed with a non-toxic soil binder or covered with plastic or revegetated until placed in use. c)Tires of vehicles will be washed before the vehicle leaves the project site and enters a paved road. d)Dirt on paved surfaces shall be removed daily to minimize generation of fugitive dust. 3-5 Prior to the issuance of building permits,where cut and CP B Prior to building A 2 fill slopes are created higher than three feet, a detailed permit issuance Landscape and Irrigation Plan shall be submitted to the City Planning Department prior to grading plan approval. The plans shall be reviewed for type and density of ground cover, shrubs, and trees, and shall be consistent with the Neighborhood Theme Plan of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3-6 Prior to the issuance of building permits, graded, but BO B, C Prior to building A, C 2, 3 undeveloped land shall be maintained weed-free and planted permit issuance with interim landscaping within ninety days of completion of grading,unless building permits are obtained. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Building Official. 2OF21 Mitigation Measures No. Responsible . . of Verified Sanctions for ImplementingDate/initials Non-Compliance 3.0 Earth Resources 3-7 Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, planting of CE B,C Prior to A,C 3 developed land shall comply with the National Pollutant occupancy permit Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Best Management issuance Practices Construction Handbook Section 6.2. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 3-8 Prior to the issuance of building permits,all grading shall BO B, C Prior to building A,C 2 be conducted in conformance with the recommendations permit issuance contained within the Geotechnical Report included as DEIR Appendix B. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 4.0 Water Resources _ 4-1 Prior to the issuance of a grading permit,the developer CE B Prior to grading A, C 2 shall obtain Clean Water Act Section 401 and 404 permits(for permit issuance water quality certification for dredge and fill operations), if necessary,from the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers. Copies of the same shall be provided to City Building and Safety. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 4-2 Prior to issuance of the first occupancy permit, the CE B Prior to issuance B 3 planned revetment along the East Etiwanda Channel adjacent of first occupancy to the project site shall be installed,subject to approval by the permit San Bernardino County Flood Control District and receipt of that approval to the City Engineer. 4-3 Prior to the recordation of each phase or approval of a CE B Prior to the A, B, C 1, 2 grading permit, the project proponent will implement the on- recordation of and off-site drainage system improvements as outlined in the each phase or project Drainage Study (DEIR Appendix D). This includes approval of a detention facilities proposed at 24th Street(Wilson Avenue) grading permit and Etiwanda Creek or onsite, participation in the County's Etiwanda Creek fee program, and participation in the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Drainage Policy program, including appropriate fair share fees. Implementation of this measure is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit. 3OF21 Mitigation Measures No. Responsible of Verified Sanctions for 1 Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance 4.0 Water Resources -. 4-4 Prior to issuance of building permits,the applicant shall CE B Prior to building D 2 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality permit issuance Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices(BMPs)that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga June 2000. 4-5 Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits,applicant CE B Prior to grading or D 2 shall submit to the City Engineer a Notice of Intent(NOI) to paving permits comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained(i.e., a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Engineer for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. 4-6 Prior to the issuance of building permits, drainage and CE B Prior to building A, C 2 flood control facilities and improvements shall be designed permit issuance and constructed in accordance with the San Bernardino County Flood Control District requirements, as applicable. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the County Flood Control District and receipt of approval by the City Engineer. 4-7 Prior to issuance of a grading permit,the developer will CE B Prior to grading C 2 pay the required drainage fee related to the San Bernardino permit issuance County Flood Control District Etiwanda Creek watershed. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the County Flood Control District and receipt of approval by the City Engineer. 4OF21 Mitigation Measures No.I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method . Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance 5.0 Transportation and Circulation 5-1 Prior to the issuance of the first occupancy permit for the CE D Prior to first B, D 3 project, the following intersections are projected to be occupancy permit warranted for traffic signals by opening year: issuance • Day Creek Boulevard(NS)at Banyan Avenue(EW) • Day Creek Boulevard (NS) at SR-210 West Bound Ramp (EW) • Day Creek Boulevard (NS) at SR-210 East Bound Ramp (EW) • Etiwanda Avenue (NS)at Banyan Avenue(EW) • Etiwanda Avenue(NS)at Wilson Avenue(EW) • East Avenue (NS)at Banyan Avenue(EW) The applicant shall make a fair share contribution, as identified in the project traffic report, to the traffic signal mitigation program of the County of San Bernardino and/or City of Rancho Cucamonga, as appropriate. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 5-2 Prior to the issuance of building permits for each phase, CE C Prior to building A, B, C 2 the project shall incorporate bus tum-outs and/or shelters if permit issuance required by Omni-Trans and/or the Transportation for each phase Commission. The project applicant shall consult with and obtain clearance from these agencies to assure compliance with the Regional Mobility and Air Quality Management Plans. Confirmation of contact and compliance with their requirements shall be provided to the City Engineer. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 5-3 Prior to the issuance of building permits for each phase, CE B Prior to building C 2 the applicant shall pay a fair share basis for off-site permit issuance improvements as identified in the project traffic report. This for each phase measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, including but not limited to the following: • 24`"Avenue (Wilson Avenue)from Etiwanda Avenue to Day Creek; • Day Creek Boulevard from 241" (Wilson)to Highland Avenue; • 24`" (Wilson)between Etiwanda Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road; and • East Avenue from south of the project limit to 23rd Street. 5OF21 Mitigation Measures No. Responsible of Verified Sanctions for ImplementingFrequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance -7"' 5.0 Transportation and Circulation 5-4 Prior to the issuance of building permits for each phase, CE B Prior to building C 2 the applicant shall pay a"fair share"contribution towards off- permit issuance site impacts to linked roadways and intersections,as outlined for each phase in the project traffic report. The project share of the cost has been calculated based on the proportion of the project peak hour traffic contributed to the improvement location relative to the total new peak hour Year 2015 traffic volume. The project's fair share of identified intersection and roadway link cost is $63,818 as of the date of the traffic study. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of City Engineer, including any changes in the project's fair share contribution due to changes in the Consumer Price Index or similar public works measures. 5-5 Prior to issuance of an occupancy permit for the first CE D Prior to first A 3 residential unit, the developer shall construct East Avenue occupancy permit and Etiwanda Avenue to City standards, as outlined in the issuance project traffic report. These improvements will be made to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 5-6 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer CE B Prior to grading A, D 2 shall coordinate all construction-related activities to minimize permit issuance congestion and delay on local roadways,to the satisfaction of City Engineer. 6OF21 Mitigation Measures No. I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method . ImplementingDate/initials Non-Compliance 5.0 Transportation and Circulation 5-7 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer BO B Prior to grading D 2 shall submit a Dust Control Plan (DCP) to the City Building permit issuance and Safety Department consistent with SCAQMD guidelines. The DCP shall include activities to reduce on-site and on-site dust production. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Building Official. Such activities shall include, but are not limited to,the following: a)Throughout grading and construction activities,exposed soil shall be kept moist through a minimum of twice daily watering to reduce fugitive dust. b)Street sweeping shall be conducted, when visible soil accumulations occur along site access roadways to remove dirt dropped by construction vehicles or dried mud carried off by trucks moving dirt or bringing construction materials. Site access driveways and adjacent streets will be washed if there are visible signs of any dirt track-out at the conclusion of any workday. c)AII trucks hauling dirt away from the site shall be covered to prevent the generation of fugitive dust. d)During high wind conditions(i.e.,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph), areas with disturbed soil will be watered hourly, and activities on unpaved surfaces shall be terminated until wind speeds no longer exceed 25 mph. 6.0 Air Quality 6-1 During construction,all construction equipment shall be BO C City Inspectors to A 4 maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce monitor during operational emissions. Contractor shall ensure that all construction construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 6-2 Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer CP B Developer to C, D 2 shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed submit schedule and projected equipment use. Construction documentation of contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile compliance construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures City Inspectors to A 4 imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District monitor (SCAQMD)as well as City Planning Staff, compliance 7OF21 Mitigation Measures No. Responsible . . of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification • . te/initials Non-Compliance 6.0 Air Quality 6-3 During construction,all paints and coatings shall meet or BO C City Inspectors to A 4 exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. monitor Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high compliance volume, low-pressure spray, to the satisfaction of the City during painting Inspectors. 6-4 During construction, all asphalt shall meet or exceed BO C City Inspectors to A 4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108,to the monitor satisfaction of the City Inspectors. compliance during paving 6-5 During grading and construction, the prime contractor BO C City Inspectors to A 4 shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for monitor prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). compliance during construction 6-6 During construction, all construction equipment shall BO C City Inspectors to A 4 comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403,to the satisfaction monitor of the City Inspectors. Additionally,contractors shall include compliance the following provisions: during • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site construction through seeding and watering; • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads; • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods; • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices; • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction; • Suspend grading operations during high winds(i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph)in accordance with Rule 403 requirements; and • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 8OF21 Mitigation Measures No. Responsible g of Method . Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /initials Non-Compliance 6.0 Air Quality 4 6-7 During grading, the site shall be treated with water or BO B City Inspectors to A, D 4 other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and monitor Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCBj) daily to compliance reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule during grading 403.This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Inspectors. 6-8 Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C City Inspectors to A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas monitor that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMio compliance emissions. This measure shall be implemented to the during satisfaction of the City Inspectors. construction 6-9 During construction, contractors shall utilize electric or BO C City Inspectors to A 4 clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. monitor This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the compliance City Inspectors. 6-10 During construction, contractors shall ensure that BO C City Inspectors to A 4 construction and grading plans include a statement that work monitor crews will shut off equipment when not in use. This measure compliance shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Inspectors. during construction 6-11 Prior to approval of building permits,the developer shall BO B Developer C 2 demonstrate that all residential structures have incorporated submits plans for high efficiency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, approval appliances and water heaters. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Building Official. 6-12 Prior to approval of building permits,the developer shall BO B Developer C 2 demonstrate that all residential structures have incorporated submits plans for thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. This measure approval shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Building Official. 6-13 Prior to the issuance of building permits,the developer CP B Developer C, D 2 shall submit and obtain approval of a plan for the provision of submits plans for adequate pedestrian and bicycle facilities for project residents approval throughout the project. The plan shall detail the construction timing for bike racks at the two parks, sidewalks, and trails based upon completion prior to occupancy of the first unit of the subject phase. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Planning Department. 9OF21 Mitigation Measures No./ . . g of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance 6:0 Air Quality 6-14 Prior to the issuance of the first occupancy permit,the CE B Developer A C, D 2 applicant shall make a fair share contribution to a park and submits proof of ride facility along the 1-15 or 1-10 Freeways that would serve fee payment project residents. The fair share calculation shall be determined to the satisfaction of City Engineer. The applicant shall place the appropriate funds in a special accountfor such purposes. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 6-15 Prior to issuance of the first occupancy permit, the CE E Developer shall B, D 3 applicant shall provide a bus stop/shelterat the trailhead park construct bus to OmniTrans standards if so directed by OmniTrans,and to stop/shelter if the satisfaction of the City Engineer. needed 7.0 Biological Resources 7-1 If necessary, the applicant shall obtain the appropriate CP B Developer shall B, D 2 federal Clean Water Act(CWA)Section 404 permit from the obtain U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. If a permit is required, the determination applicantwill mitigate any loss of jurisdictional land orwetland from USACOE if areas at a minimum 1:1 ratio, which is consistent with the permit is needed project delineation report. This measure shall be —developer shall implemented to the satisfaction of the City Planning obtain if needed Department prior to the issuance of grading permits. 7-2 Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant CP B Developer shall B, D 2 shall obtain a CWA Section 401 Certification from the obtain Regional Water Quality Control Board, if necessary. This determination measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City from RWQCB if Planning Department prior to the issuance of grading permits. permit is needed —developer shall obtain if needed 7-3 If necessary, the applicant shall obtain a Streambed CP B Developer shall B, D 2 Alteration Agreement(SAA)from the California Department of obtain Fish and Game. If an SAA is required, the applicant will determination mitigate any loss of jurisdictional land at a minimum 1:1 ratio from CDF&G if as recommended by the project biology report. This measure permit is needed shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Planning —developer shall Department prior to the issuance of grading permits. obtain if needed 10 OF 21 Mitigation Measures o. if Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions FrequencyImplementing Action for Monitoring Date/initials Non-Compliance 7.0 Biological Resources . 7-4 Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, all CP D Developer shall A 3 manufactured slopes on the periphery of the development install required shall be landscaped as approved by Planning staff. This landscaping measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Planner, prior to the issuance of occupancy permits for the first unit in each phase. Prior to recordation of each phase, the phase map shall contain a note requiring this measure. 7-5 Prior to issuance of a grading permit,the applicant shall CP B Developer shall B, D 2 acquire and convey to the County Special District OS-1 or provide proof of other appropriate conservation organization 164 acres of land CSD within or near the NEOSHPP area that supports alluvial fan establishment sage scrub and/or upland sage scrub. This measure is proposed to mitigate the potential loss of habitat for sensitive plant and animal species,and the loss of raptor foraging land. This offsite mitigation land(OML)shall be of equal or greater habitat value than that of the project site. The identification and transfer of OML will be to the satisfaction of the City Planning Department,in accordance with the guidelines of the NEOSHPP. All reasonable efforts will be made to locate the CML within or near the NEOSHPP area. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Planning Department. 7-6 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a protocol CP B Biologist shall D 2 gnatcatcher survey shall be conducted. If any individuals or conduct protocol nesting pairs of birds are found onsite, the developer shall surveys before obtain appropriate take authorization and additional mitigation grading land shall be added to the amount of Offsite Mitigation Land (OML) described in Measure 7-5 according to the following minimum ratios: individual = 15 acres, nested pair = 30 acres. If gnatcatchers are found onsite, an Incidental Take Permit would be required from the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service either by a Section 10(a)permit or through a Section 7 Consultation with the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Planning Department. 11 OF 21 Mitigation Measures No. I Responsible . . Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance 7.0 Biological Resources " 7-7 Prior to the issuance of a grading permit,the developer CP B Biologist shall D 2 shall conduct a protocol survey for the San Bernardino conduct protocol kangaroo rat (SBKR) and the Santa Ana wooly star within surveys before those areas of East Etiwanda Creek within 50 feet of the grading "punch through" connection of the new northern drainage channel to the creek channel. This survey is to verify that these species do not occupy area to be disturbed by construction. If SBKR and/or Santa Ana wooly star are found to be present,the developer shall comply with applicable U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service requirements, which may include obtaining a federal Endangered Species Act Section 10(a) permit or a Section 7 Consultation through the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. SBKR or wooly star habitat disturbed by construction will be mitigated at a minimum ratio of 2:1 subject to any subsequent USFBWS permit conditions and receipt or notification to the City Planning Department. 7-8 If grading of the site has not occurred before February 15 CP B Biologist shall D 2 of 2005,protocol surveys for SBKR and gnatcatchers will be conduct protocol performed over the entire site, and each spring thereafter, surveys before until grading is completed. Any occupied habitatfound during grading those surveys for either species will be added to the amount of offsite mitigation land required under the Draft EIR (164 acres). 7-9 The developer to provide an appropriate contribution for CP B Developer shall B 2 the project toward funding a local brown-headed cowbird demonstrate proof trapping program to further benefit gnatcatchers in this area. of payment The amount of this contribution, and the location of the trapping program, shall be determined by the City in consultation with the California Department of Fish and Game. The contribution shall be made prior to grading,to the satisfaction of the City Planning Department in consultation with the California Department of Fish and Game. 7-10 Prior to issuance of grading permits,a qualified biologist CP B Biologist shall D 2 shall conduct a survey for nesting birds on the site. Any conduct protocol occupied nest shall be avoided and separated by at least 200 surveys before feet from ground-disturbing activities. Nesting areas are to be grading marked by orange construction fencing. The biologist shall verify a nest has been abandoned prior to removing the fencing and commencing ground-disturbing activities in any of these areas. 12 OF 21 Mitigation Measures No. Responsible of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance 8.0 Energy and Mineral Resources None Required 9.0 Hazards 9-1 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer CE B Developer shall B, D 2 shall submit a plan to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection submit plan for District (RCFPD) for each phase for the proper clean up of review and any hazardous or toxic substance that is discovered or approval by released during construction. The plan will require the RCFPD developerto properly clean-up and remove any contaminated soil orother material;restore the affected area to background conditions or to regulatory threshold levels for the contaminant(s) accidentally released or discovered; and deliverthe contaminated material to an appropriate treatment, recycling,or landfill facility in accordance with the regulations for the type of contaminant accidentally released and collected for management. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the RCFPD. 9-2 Each individual lot owner will be required to maintain their BO E RCFPD to A Notice/Fine for side and back yards with 30 feet of irrigated"firewise"Zone 1 conduct annual RCFPD to perform landscaping or equivalent. No buildings are to be built within inspections required work if this setback area. Swimming pools and non-combustible needed deck coverings are permissible. Any remaining portion of the backyard lot will be maintained to either Zone 1 or Zone 2 criteria depending on the lot depth. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. 9-3 Landscape and maintenance for the manufactured BO E RCFPD to A Notice/Fine for slopes common areas will be to Zone 2 criteria. These areas conduct annual RCFPD to perform may be irrigated,ornamental firewise landscaping,or planted inspections required work if with native fire resistant plants and trees. Access points needed every 500 feet shall be available to perform annual maintenance. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. 13 OF 21 Mitigation Measures No.i Responsible of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance 9.0 Hazards r_ ,.....,., 9-4 A special fuel modification zone easement shall be BO E RCFPD to A Notice/Fine for located outside and adjacent to the northern project boundary conduct annual RCFPD to perform within the electric utility corridor and on flood control district inspections required work if land where all native and exotic vegetation will be treated to needed Zone 2 criteria on a strip of land 50 feet in width. Also,a Fuel Modification Zone Easement of 75 feet in width will be created and maintained by the maintenance authority adjacent to the east side of Lot 46,Phase 4. Alternatively,the tentative tract map may be modified to allow an appropriate onsite Fuel Modification Zone along the northern boundary if the electric corridor cannot be used. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. 9-5 All residential structures within the Tract 14749 BO D- RCFPD or City to A 3 development will be built with a Class A Roof Assembly, conduct including a Class A roof covering and attic or foundation inspections ventilation louvers or ventilation openings in vertical walls shall not exceed 144 square inches per opening. These opening shall be covered with '/, inch mesh corrosion- resistant metal screening or other approved material that offers equivalent protection. Attic ventilation shall also comply with the requirements of the Uniform Building Code(U.B.C.). Ventilation louvers and openings may be incorporated as part of access assemblies. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. 9-6 A six-foot high solid non-combustible wall shall be CP D Developer to A 3 constructed along the entire length of the north,east and west construct property lines to minimize fire danger. This measure shall be perimeter walls implemented to the satisfaction of the City Planning Department. 9-7 Prior to the issuance of the first occupancy permit, the CP D Developer to A 3 applicant shall provide signs along the community trails, prepare and including the west bank of East Etiwanda Creek, that wam install signs per residents of the potential risk of wildlife/human interactions. City direction The wording, design, number, and placement of the signs shall be to the satisfaction of the City Planning Department. 14 OF 21 Mitigation . . Method of Verified Sanctions for ImplementingDate/initials Non-Compliance 9.0 Hazards 9-8 The applicant shall provide wildlife resistant trash CP D Developer shall A 3 receptacles at the parks and other public facilities to prevent provide required foraging by local wildlife. The design and placement of the facilities receptacles shall be to the satisfaction of the City Planning Department. 10.0 Noise 10-1 Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed CP C Developer shall A 4 the standards specified in Development Code Section retain noise 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer consultant to shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level perform required monitoring as specified in Development Code Section monitoring 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Planning Division. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Planning Division within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards,then the consultant shall immediately notify the Planning Division. If noise levels exceed the above standards,then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 10-2 During construction,haul truck deliveries shall not take BO C City Inspectors to A 4 place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on monitor- weekdays,including Saturday,or at any time on Sunday or a compliance national holiday. Additionally,if heavy trucks used for hauling during would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 15 OF 21 Mitigation Measures No. . . of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance 10.0 Noise 10-3 Prior to the issuance of grading and building permits for BO B Developer to D 2 each phase, the developer shall confirm to Building and submit Safety in writing that all construction equipment, fixed or documentation of mobile,shall use properly operating mufflers.No combustion compliance to equipment,such as pumps or generators,shall be allowed to City operate within 500 feet of any occupied residence from 6:30 p.m.to 7 a.m.unless the equipment is surrounded by a noise protection barrier. Stationary equipment shall be placed in such a manner as emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors. Additionally,stockpiling of vehicles and staging areas shall be located as far as practical from sensitive noise receptors as well. The developer shall include this provision and adherence to all conditions of approval as a requirement of all construction contracts for this site. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Planning Department. 10-4 Prior to the issuance of grading and/or building permits, CP B Developer C 2 all construction staging shall be performed at least 500 feet submits plan to from occupied dwellings. The location of staging areas, as City for review indicated on the grading plan, will be subject to review and approval by the City Planning Department. C City Inspectors A 4 monitor 10-5 Prior to the issuance of building permits for each phase, BO B Developer shall C, D 2 the developer will document that exterior residential areas will submit proof of have exterior noise levels of less than 65 dB CNEL, to the compliance satisfaction of the City Building and Safety Department. 10-6 Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits for each BO D Developer shall D 3 phase,the developer shall document that interior living areas submit proof of have noise levels less than 45 dB CNEL,to the satisfaction of compliance the Building and Safety Department. 10-7 Prior to the issuance of building permits for each phase, BO D City Inspectors to A, D 2 the developer shall incorporate site designs and measures to verify compliance help reduce proposed noise levels over the long-term. Residential lots with rear yards or side yards adjacent to collector streets(i.e. Lower Crest)shall be constructed with a 6-foot block wall along the perimeter or demonstrate with an additional noise study that ultimate traffic volumes onsite will not exceed the noise performance standards in the City Development Code to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Department. 16 OF 21 Mitigation Measures No. Responsible g of Method . Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance 11.0Public Services 11-1 Prior to the issuance of building permits for each phase, BO B Developer to D 2 the developer and/or individual homebuilders shall pay all submit proof of legally established public service fees, including police,fire, fee payments schools, parks, and libraries to the affected public agencies as stipulated in the Development Agreement. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Building and Safety Department. 11-2 Prior to the issuance of building permits for each phase, CP B Developer to C 2 the developer and/or individual homebuilders shall comply submit plans to with all design requirements of affected public agencies such agencies for as police, fire, health, etc. This measure shall be review and implemented to the satisfaction of the City Planning approval Department. 11-3 Prior to the issuance of building permits for each phase, FC B Developer to C 2 the applicant shall obtain approval of the Fire Departmentwith submit plans to regard to determination of adequate fire flow and installation RCFD for review of acceptable fire resistant structural materials in project and approval buildings. 11-4 Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits for each BO D Developer shall g 3 phase, the applicant shall pay all legally established impact submit proof of fees to the Etiwanda School District and the Chaffey Joint payment of school Union High School District in accordance with state law. fees Proof of such payment shall be submitted to City Building and Safety Department. 11-5 Prior to recordation for each phase,the developer shall CE B Developer shall D 1 post a bond in an amount to be determined by the City demonstrate Engineering Department to ensure installation and payment of bond maintenance of all public and private roads and drainage facilities necessary for each phase of the project. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 12.0 Utilities' 12-1 Prior to the issuance of building permits for each phase, BO g Developer shall B 2 the applicant shall provide funding to the Cucamonga County demonstrate Water District for sewer service. Additionally,the Cucamonga payment County Water District will be required to provide funds to the Inland Empire Utilities Agency for treatment of the project's wastewater. Proof of such payment shall be submitted to the City Building and Safety Department. 17 OF 21 Mitigation Measures No. Responsible g of Method . Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance 12.0 Utilities 12-2 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, development CE B Developer shall B 2 plans shall be provided to Southern California Edison, the submit proof of Gas Company, and Verizon, as they become available in review and order to facilitate engineering, design and construction of approval by other improvements necessary to provide electrical, natural gas, agencies and telephone service to the project site. This shall be done to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 12-3 Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant CE B Developer shall B 2 shall apply for and obtain will-serve letters from SCE,SCGC, submit service and Verizon and place them on file with the City Engineer. letters from other agencies 12-4 Prior to the issuance of building permits,the applicant CE B Developer shall B, C 2 shall comply with the guidelines provided by SCE,SCGC,and submit proof of Verizon in regard to easement restrictions, construction review and guidelines, protection of pipeline easements, and potential approval by other amendments to right-of-way in the areas of any existing agencies easements of these companies. This shall be done to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 13.0 Aesthetics 13-1 All outdoor lighting shall be submitted to the Planning CP B Developer shall C 2 Department for plan check and shall comply with the submit lighting requirements of Etiwanda North Specific Plan design plans to City for guidelines and the City General Plan. This measure shall be review and implemented to the satisfaction of the City Planner. approval 13-2 Prior to issuance of building permits the developer shall CE B Developer shall C 2 submit construction plans for any signage associated with the submit signage site, including entrance monuments (but excluding street plans to City for signs and traffic signs), primarily of natural appearing review and materials (i.e. wood and rock), consistent with the Etiwanda approval North Specific Plan design guidelines. If signs are lighted, light must be directed toward the sign rather than backlighting. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Planning Department. 13-3 Prior to final inspection or occupancy of each phase,the CP D City Planners to A 3 City will evaluate the site lighting,including entrance lighting, inspect lighting The lighting will be adequately shielded or directed to minimize on-and offsite impacts,to the satisfaction of the City Planning Department. - 18 OF 21 Mitigation Measures No. if Responsible . . . Timing of Method • Verified Sanctions for VerificationImplementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification � . 13.0 Aesthetics 13-4 Prior to recordation for each phase, the developer will BO B Developer to D 1 provide the telephone numbers of persons to contact if there provide numbers are complaints about noise, odors, night-lighting, etc. from to City activities on the project site. This information should be displayed on a sign visible from the entrance to the development. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Building and Safety Department. 13-5 Prior to issuance of building permits the developer will CP B Developer to C 2 prepare a detailed landscaping and wall treatment plan forthe submit landscape Phase 1 area along the "Lower West Collector," to the plans to City for satisfaction of the City Planning Department.Special attention review and shall be given to the landscape treatments along Etiwanda approval Avenue and East Avenue and at entrances to the project. 14.0 Cultural Resources 14-1 A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a CP B Developer to A, B, D 2 preconstruction field survey of the project site. The retain paleo to paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also survey site provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate,the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay,to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities; • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded,divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find; and Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. 19 OF 21 Mitigation Measures No. Responsible . . . Timing of Method . . . Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance 14.0 Cultural Resources "` _ " 9 14-2 If any prehistoric archaeological resources are CP C Developerwill A 4 encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction retain archaeo monitor activities,to take appropriate measures to protector preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist,the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value; • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments,using their special qualities as a theme or focal point; • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage; • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources,following appropriate CEQA guidelines; • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving;and If artifacts of Native American (NA) origin are discovered,official representatives of the NA group will be consulted to determine the most appropriate disposition of the artifacts, to the satisfaction of the City Planning Department in agreement with County Museum and the NA group. 15.0 Agricultural Resources None Required 16.0 Recreation 16-1 The applicant will submit conceptual park design and CP B Developer to C 2 landscaping plans to the City subject to the approval of the submit park plans City Planning Department. to City for review and approval 20 OF 21 Key to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification Sanctions CDD-Community Development Director or designee A-With Each New Development A-On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map CP-City Planner or designee B-Prior To Construction B-Other Agency Permit/Approval 2-Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE-City Engineer or designee C-Throughout Construction C-Plan Check 3-Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO-Building Official or designee D-On Completion D-Separate Submittal(Reports I Studies/Plans) 4-Stop Work Order PO-Police Captain or designee E-Operating 5-Retain Deposit or Bonds FC-Fire Chief or designee 6-Revoke CUP 21 OF 21