Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014/09/17 - Agenda Packet Am, '00� city of MILIeTANCH (JOUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Drive 4 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801 City Office: (909)477-2700 AGENDAS FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD SUCCESSOR AGENCY PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETINGS WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 17, 2014 REGULAR MEETINGS 19t and 3rd Wednesdays 4 7:00 P.M. ORDER OF BUSINESS CLOSED SESSION Tapia Conference Room................. 5:00 P.M. Call to Order Public Communications Conduct of Closed Session City Manager Announcements SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS MEETING Council Chambers.......................... 6:00 P.M. REGULAR MEETINGS Council Chambers.......................... 7:00 P.M. MEMBERS MAYOR L. Dennis Michael MAYOR PRO TEM Sam Spagnolo COUNCIL MEMBERS William Alexander Marc Steinorth Diane Williams CITY MANAGER John R. Gillison CITY ATTORNEY James L. Markman CITY CLERK Janice C. Reynolds INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE FIRE BOARD, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL The Fire Board,Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council encourage free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesyto others,the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Fire Board, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council byfilling out a speaker card and submitting it to the City Clerk. The speaker cards are located on the wall at the back of the Chambers, at the front desk behind the staff table and at the City Clerk's desk. If as part of your presentation, you would like to display visual material, please see the City Clerk before the meeting commences.Any handouts for the Fire Board, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority or City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution. During"Public Communications,"your name will be called to speak on any item listed or not listed on the agenda in the order in which it was received. The "Public Communications" period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items(with the exception of public hearing items)will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other"Public Communications"which have not concluded during this one-hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. If you are present to speak on an"Advertised Public Hearing"or on an"Administrative Hearing"Item(s),your name will be called when that item is being discussed, in the order in which it was received. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less,as deemed necessary by the Chair,depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter, the City's Public Library(-ies) and on the City's website. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the desk located behind the staff table during the Council meeting. LIVE BROADCAST Fire Board,Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access. Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The City has added the option for customers without cable access to view the meetings"on-demand"from their computers. The added feature of"Streaming Video On Demand"is available on the City's website at www.cityofrc.us/cityhall/council/videos.asp for those with Hi-bandwidth (DSL/Cable Modem)or Low-bandwidth (Dial-up) Internet service. The Fire Board,Successor Agency,Public Financing Authority and City Council meet regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m.in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board,Successor Agency,Public Financing Authority and City Council. Copies of the agendas and minutes can be found® www.citvofrc.us ® If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY 1 AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SEPTEMBER 17, 2014 A. 5:00 P.M. - CLOSED SESSION CALL TO ORDER - TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM Al. Roll Call: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tern Spagnolo Council Members Alexander, Steinorth and Williams CLOSED SESSION CALLED TO ORDER AS THE CITY COUNCIL. B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION - TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM D1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER AND LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION. D2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 12400 ARROW ROUTE (APN 0229-021-60-0000); NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER AND JEFF BLOOM, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER AND OMNITRANS; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. D3. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 5546 WEST BERYL AVENUE, AND GENERALLY REFERRED TO AS THE HERITAGE PARK EQUESTRIAN CENTER; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: NETTIE NIELSEN, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR; WILLIAM WITTKOPF, PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DIRECTOR, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE ALTA LOMA RIDING CLUB; REGARDING LEASE TERMS. D4. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR VARIES PARK PROPERTIES THROUGHOUT THE CITY GENERALLY; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: NETTIE NIELSEN, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR; WILLIAM WITTKOPF, PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DIRECTOR, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE CHAFFEY JOINT UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT; REGARDING LEASE TERMS. E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS NO DISCUSSION OR ACTION WILL OCCUR FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY 2 AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA r�11-11()t6C�i,HG_, SEPTEMBER 17, 2014 F. RECESS CLOSED SESSION TO RECESS TO THE REGULAR FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. G. SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL ONLY CALL TO ORDER - 6:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL WILL BE CALLED TO ORDER G1. Pledge of Allegiance G2. Roll Call: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo Council Members Alexander, Steinorth and Williams H. ITEMS OF BUSINESS H1. Presentation of Certificates of Recognition to Little League Baseball "All-Star"Teams A. Intermediate Division — Vineyard Little League All-Stars District 71 Champions B. Majors Division—Vineyard Little League All Stars District 71 Champions and Section 8 Champions C. 11 Year Old Division— Deer Canyon Little League All-Stars District 71 Champions and Section 8 Champions H2. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION ON ITEM LISTED ON THE SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA. I. RECESS THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING WILL CONVENE AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY 3 AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SEPTEMBER 17, 2014 J. REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL WILL BE CALLED TO ORDER. IT IS THE INTENT TO CONCLUDE THE MEETINGS BY 10:00 P.M., UNLESS EXTENDED BY CONCURRENCE OF THE FIRE BOARD, AUTHORITY BOARD AND COUNCIL. J1. Pledge of Allegiance J2. Roll Call: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tern Spagnolo Council Members Alexander, Steinorth and Williams K. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS K1. Recognition of Jacob Fakhoury for his Eagle Scout project at Hellman Fire Station 177. K2. Recognition of Dr. Harvey Cohen for conducting the `The Doctor Is In" senior health lectures at the senior center. K3. Proclamation Declaring September 2014"Adult Literacy Awareness Month". L. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection District, Public Financing Authority Board and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Fire Protection District, Public Financing Authority Board and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Board, Public Financing Authority Board and City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Fire Board, Authority Board or City Council not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY 4 AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA . ,aetcAMONG\ SEPTEMBER 17, 2014 CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Fire Board/Successor Agency/Authority Board/Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Fire Board/Successor Agency/Authority Board/Council Member for discussion. M. CONSENT CALENDAR - FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT I Ml. Approval of Minutes: September 2, 2014 (Special Meeting) September 3, 2014 (Regular Meeting - CANCELLED) M2. Approval of Check Register dated August 27, 2014 through September 9, 2014 for the total 1 of$70,648.47. M3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of August 31, 2014. 9 M4. Adoption of Annual Statement of Investment Policy. 14 M5. Approval of a Resolution Updating the Fire Agencies Insurance Risk Authority (FAIRA) JPA 30 Governing Board of Directors Appointed Representative. RESOLUTION NO. FD 14-045 31 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING AN APPOINTMENT OF ITS REPRESENTATIVE(S) TO THE FIRE AGENCIES INSURANCE RISK AUTHORITY (FAIRA) GOVERNING BOARD OF DIRECTORS M6. Approval to award a Single Source Professional Services Agreement with Newcomb, 33 Anderson, and McCormick for solar energy engineering services in the amount not to exceed $65,400 funded from account 1025001-5300 (Capitol Reserve/Central Park), 1333303-5300 (LMD#3B/Metrolink), and 3288501-5300 (Capital Improvement/Fire Stations); and authorize the appropriation of $13,080 from Fund 1700312-5300 (Epicenter) for the additional solar site. M7. Approval of a Resolution Temporarily Changing the Time and Place of Fire District and City 35-1 Council Meetings RESOLUTION NO. FD 14-048 35-2 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE DAYS, TIME AND PLACE OF TEMPORARY REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR ••• AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY 5 • J AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SEPTEMBER 1752014 M8. Accept the proposal received, award and authorize the execution of a contract in the 35-4 amount not to exceed $270,000 for the "City Council Chambers Media Systems Restoration Project" in accordance with RFP $14/15-101, to Spinitar of La Mirada and authorize the expenditure of a 20% contingency in the amount of $54,000 to be funded from 1025001-5602 (City Capital Outlay — Building and Improvements - $270,000) and 3288501-5602 (Fire Protection District Capital Outlay — Building and Improvements - $54,000); and approve an appropriation in the amount of $270,000 from the City Capital Reserve Account Fund (025) into account 1025001-5602 and approve an appropriation in the amount of $54,000 from the Fire District Capital Reserves Account Fund (288) into account 3288501-5602. r------ N. CONSENT CALENDAR - SUCCESSOR AGENCY N1. Approval of Minutes: September 2, 2014 (Special Meeting) ___ September 3, 2014 (Regular Meeting - CANCELLED) 0. CONSENT CALENDAR - PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY 01. Approval of Minutes: September 2, 2014 (Special Meeting) September 3, 2014 (Regular Meeting - CANCELLED) P. CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL P1. Approval of Minutes: September 2, 2014 (Special Meeting) September 3, 2014 (Regular Meeting - CANCELLED) --- P2. Approval of Check Register dated August 27, 2014 through September 9, 2014 and payroll 36 ending September 9, 2014 for the total of $5,364,264.07. P3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of August 31, 2014. 44 P4. Approval to adopt Annual Statement of Investment Policy. 53 P5. Approval of a Resolution adopting a Memorandum of Understanding between the City of 69 Rancho Cucamonga and the San Bernardino Public Employees Association for the period 2014-2017. RESOLUTION NO. 14-166 70 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION RELATIVE TO WAGES, BENEFITS AND OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT FOR THE PERIOD JULY 1, 2014 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2017 Y FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY 6 • ' . 1 AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA �oeibUMoN�,, SEPTEMBER 17, 2014 P6. Approval to award a Single Source Professional Services Agreement with Newcomb, 89 Anderson, and McCormick for solar energy engineering services in the amount not to exceed $65,400 funded from account 1025001-5300 (Capitol Reserve/Central Park), 1333303-5300 (LMD#3B/Metrolink), and 3288501-5300 (Capital Improvement/Fire Stations); and authorize the appropriation of $13,080 from Fund 1700312-5300 (Epicenter) for the additional solar site. P7. Approval of specifications for the Parks Painting Project and authorize the City Clerk to 92 advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids", to be funded from accounts: 1130303-5300 (LMD 1), 1131303-5300 (LMD 2), 1133303-5300 (LMD 3B), 1134303-5300 (LMD 4), 1140303-5300 (LMD 10) and 1868203-5300 (CFD 2000-03). RESOLUTION NO. 14-167 94 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE PARKS PAINTING PROJECT IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS P8. Approval of a resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California to 98 decline establishing a procurement target for energy storage systems for the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. RESOLUTION NO. 14-168 100 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING TO DECLINE ESTABLISHING A PROCUREMENT TARGET FOR ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY P9. A request to vacate a portion of the north side of 24th Street located west of Haven Avenue 101 and south of Arrow Route APNs 209-122-19,-18. RESOLUTION NO. 14-169 103 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF EXCESS RIGHTS-OF-WAY INCLUDING A 10-FOOT WIDTH ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 24TH STREET LOCATED WEST OF HAVEN AVENUE AND SOUTH OF ARROW ROUTE APNs 209-122-19,-18 P10. A request to vacate a portion of the south side of 25th Street located west of Haven Avenue 104 and south of Arrow Route APNs 209-104-02,-37 RESOLUTION NO. 14-170 106 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF EXCESS RIGHTS-OF-WAY INCLUDING A 10-FOOT WIDTH ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 25TH STREET LOCATED WEST OF HAVEN AVENUE AND SOUTH OF ARROW ROUTE APNs 209-104-02,-37 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY 7 AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SEPTEMBER 17, 2014 P11. Release of Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. 7635157 in the amount of $48,477.32, for 107 the FY 2012/2013 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation — Overlay of Various Streets project, Contract No. 13-093. P12. Approval of a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, 109 adopting the Measure "I" Five Year Capital Project Needs Analysis for Fiscal Years 2015/2016 through 2019/2020. RESOLUTION NO. 14-171 116 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE MEASURE "I" FIVE YEAR CAPITAL PROJECT NEEDS ANALYSIS FOR FISCAL YEARS 2015/2016 THROUGH 2019/2020 P13. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, Monumentation Cash 117 Deposit and ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Tract Map 18870, located about 525 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue, at the north side of Arrow Route, submitted by Lennar Homes of California, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 14-172 119 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FINAL MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR TRACT 18870 RESOLUTION NO. 14-173 120 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR TRACT 18870 RESOLUTION NO. 14-174 125 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) FOR TRACT 18870 RESOLUTION NO. 14-175 130 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 FOR TRACT 18870 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY g AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA �11A10N,, SEPTEMBER 17, 2014 P14. Approval of plans, specifications and estimates and to authorize the advertising of the 135 Notice Inviting Bids for the "Day Creek Channel and Deer Creek Channel Bike Trail Improvements", to be funded from Funds 214 (Transportation Development Act) and 198 (City-Wide Infrastructure Improvements). 137 RESOLUTION NO. 14-176 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "DAY CREEK CHANNEL AND DEER CREEK CHANNEL BIKE TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS P14. Approval of a Resolution Temporarily Changing the Time and Place of Fire District and City 140-1 Council Meetings RESOLUTION NO. 14-180 140-2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, DETERMINING THE DAYS, TIME AND PLACE OF TEMPORARY REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL P15. Accept the proposal received, award and authorize the execution of a contract in the 140-4 amount not to exceed $270,000 for the "City Council Chambers Media Systems Restoration Project" in accordance with RFP $14/15-101, to Spinitar of La Mirada and authorize the expenditure of a 20% contingency in the amount of $54,000 to be funded from 1025001-5602 (City Capital Outlay — Building and Improvements - $270,000) and 3288501-5602 (Fire Protection District Capital Outlay — Building and Improvements - $54,000); and approve an appropriation in the amount of $270,000 from the City Capital Reserve Account Fund (025) into account 1025001-5602 and approve an appropriation in the amount of $54,000 from the Fire District Capital Reserves Account Fund (288) into account 3288501-5602. Q. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY COUNCIL The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Mayor will open the meeting to receive public testimony. O1. Consideration to approve a Resolution setting rates for residential and 141 commercial/industrial refuse and recycling collection within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. RESOLUTION NO. 14-179 145 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SETTING RATES FOR RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAUINDUSTRIAL REFUSE AND RECYCLING COLLECTION WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY g AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SEPTEMBER 17, 2014 Q2. Environmental Assessment and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2013-00887 — Manning 148 Homes: A request to change the zoning designation of part of a property about 7.16 acres located between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue, at the north side of the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail, about 1,400 feet north of Base Line Road from Low Medium (LM) Residential to Medium (M) Residential District in conjunction with a proposed 46-lot subdivision; APN: 1076-181-01. Related files: Pre-Application Review DRC2013-00545, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912, Development Review DRC2013-01083, Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00889, and Minor Exception DRC2014-00161. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Environmental Assessment and Zoning Code Amendment DRC2014-00626 — Manning 148 Homes: A request to amend the Development Code to incorporate development standards such as minimum lot dimensions, setbacks, lot coverage, etc. for single-family residential development within the Medium (M) Residential Districts. Related files: Pre- Application Review DRC2013-00545, Tentative Tract Map SUBT718912, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2013-00887, Development Review DRC2013-01083, Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00889, and Minor Exception DRC2014-00161. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ORDINANCE NO. 868 (FIRST READING) 428 A ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A ZONING MAP AMENDMENT TO CHANGE THE ZONING DESIGNATION OF PART OF A PROPERTY OF ABOUT 7.16 ACRES LOCATED BETWEEN ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND RAMONA AVENUE, AT THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC INLAND EMPIRE TRAIL, ABOUT 1,400 FEET NORTH OF BASE LINE ROAD FROM LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL TO MEDIUM (M) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1076-181-01. ORDINANCE NO. 869 (FIRST READING) 434 A ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014-00626, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT CODE TO INCORPORATE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SUCH AS MINIMUM LOT DIMENSIONS, SETBACKS, LOT COVERAGE, ETC. FOR SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE MEDIUM (M) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY 10 AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SEPTEMBER 17, 2014 R. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Mayor will open the meeting to receive public testimony. R1. Adoption of a Resolution making determinations regarding the proposed Annexation of 439 Territory (DIAR LLC, Owner — APN: 0225-191-37 — Annexation No. 88-14-1) located at 13351 Banyan St to an existing Community Facilities District, calling a special election and authorizing submittal of levy of special taxes to the qualified electors. RESOLUTION NO. FD 14-046 442 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS REGARDING THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (ANNEXATION NO. 88-14-1) TO AN EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT (CFD 88-1) AND CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION AND AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF SUCH TERRITORY L� S. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS CITY COUNCIL AND FIRE DISTRICT The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. S1. Approval for Mayor to sign letter advocating for enhanced preservation and management of 449 Cucamonga Canyon, including the inclusion of Cucamonga Canyon into the San Gabriel National Monument, and encouraging the U.S. Forest Service to conduct additional public outreach in the San Bernardino County area. S2. Adoption of a Resolution declaring results of a special election in the Community Facilities 460 District No. 88-1, Annexation No. 88-14-1 and ordering the annexation of such property located at 13351 Banyan St, in Community Facilities District No. 88-1 (DIAR LLC, Owner— APN:0225-191-37). - Fire RESOLUTION NO. FD 14-047 461 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILTIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ELECTION IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1, ANNEXATION NO.88-14-1 AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF SUCH PROPERTY TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY 11 AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SEPTEMBER 17, 2014 T. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. T1. INTER-AGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the --- meetings that were attended.) T2. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council --- Member.) U. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING V. ADJOURNMENT I, Debra L. McNay, Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on September 11, 2014, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. September 2, 2014 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, CLOSED SESSION SPECIAL MEETINGS MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER The Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a regular closed session on Tuesday, September 2, 2014 in the Tapia Room at the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:00 p.m. by Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Present were Council Members: Bill Alexander, Diane Williams, Marc Steinorth, Mayor Pro Tern Sam Spagnolo and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; City Attorney Jim Markman; Linda Daniels, Assistant City Manager; Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services; Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development and Robert Neiuber, Human Resource Manager. B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) The following closed session items were considered: D1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER AND LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION. - CITY D2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PURSUANT TO GC § 54956.8 REGARDING REAL PROPERTY IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS: 0225-12-204 AND 0225-13-120. NEGOTIATING PARTIES: WALT STICKNEY, ASSOCIATE ENGINEER AND KIRSTEN R. BOWMAN, ESQ. AND JEFFREY A. WYNN, MANAGER AND BRYAN OTAKE, ESQ. FOR METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA (MWDSC). UNDER NEGOTIATION: PRICE AND TERMS. - CITY D3. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 12400 ARROW ROUTE (APN 0229-021-60-0000); NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER AND JEFF BLOOM, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER AND OMNITRANS; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. — CITY Mayor Pro Tern Spagnolo left the room during the discussion of Item D3. D4. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 REGARDING REAL PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 8846 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD AND 7948 VINEYARD AVENUE, NORTH SIDE OF SAN BERNARDINO ROAD, WEST OF VINEYARD, IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 0207-101-48 AND 0207- 091-56, 57; NEGOTIATING PARTIES MIKE COSTELLO, FIRE CHIEF AND PAMELA PANE MANAGEMENT ANALYST II ON BEHALF OF THE DISTRICT AND HOME & LAND, LLC; REGARDING NOTICE OF CLOSE OF ESCROW AND ACCEPTANCE OF PROPERTY. —CITY C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) No public communications were made. E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS No discussion or actions were taken. * DRAFT * September 2, 2014 1 Special Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority, City Council Meetings I City of Rancho Cucamonga I Minutes I Page 1 of 6 F. RECESS CLOSED SESSION TO RECESS TO THE REGULAR FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY AND CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. The closed session recessed at 5:50 p.m. with no action taken. G. REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS The meetings of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Financing Authority and City Council reconvened in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor L. Dennis Michael called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present were Council/Fire Protection District Members: Bill Alexander, Diane Williams, Marc Steinorth, Mayor Pro TemNice President Sam Spagnolo and Mayor/President L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; City Attorney Jim Markman; Linda Daniels, Assistant City Manager; Mark Steuer, City Engineer; City Treasurer Jim Frost; Police Chief Tony Onodera, Chief Mike Costello; Daniel Schneider, Community Services Superintendent; Debra McNay, Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager and Adrian Garcia, Assistant City Clerk. H. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS H1. Recognition of former Fire Chief Mike Bell upon his retirement. Mayor Michael presented the City tile to former Fire Chief Mike Bell and wished him well on his retirement. H2. Presentation of a check to the City for in-kind products. Arnel Ryan, representing Amaxi Nutrition Products, presented a check to the City. I. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS 11. Jim Frost expressed concerns regards the wild life crossings north of the City. (Item M9) 12. Bill Hanlon expressed concerns with Red Hill Park project (Item N2). Mr. Hanlon indicated that he was not able to print the Staff Report. Instead he had to print the whole agenda packet. 13. Jim Moffatt expressed concerns Code Enforcement issuing notices to a handicapped man in a wheelchair. He reported that now Code Enforcement is requiring a wooden fence. 14. Lynne Kennedy announced that she was running for City Council in this upcoming Election. 15.John Lyons indicated that he supporting the current Council,the Mayor and Councilmember Steinorth for State Assembly in this upcoming election. * DRAFT * September 2, 2014 1 Special Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority, City Council Meetings I City of Rancho Cucamonga I Minutes I Page 2 of 6 CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Fire Board/Successor Agency/Authority Board/Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Fire Board/Successor Agency/Authority Board/Council Member for discussion. J. CONSENT CALENDAR - FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT J1. Approval of Minutes: August 20, 2014 (Regular Meeting) J2. Approval of Check Register dated August 13, 2014 through August 26, 2014 for the total of $564,717.40. J3. Approval to declare surplus City owned miscellaneous vehicles, and equipment, office equipment, and computer equipment as surplus. Executive Director Gillison removed Item J3 from the agenda. MOTION: Moved by Spagnolo, seconded by Williams, to approve the remaining staff recommendations in the staff reports. Motion carried 5-0. K. CONSENT CALENDAR - PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY K1. Approval of Minutes: August 20, 2014 Minutes (Regular Meeting) K2. Adopt the attached Resolution approving the Purchase and Sale Agreement with LDC Cougar, LLC and Church Haven, LLC for the sale of the Base Line Road & Day Creek Boulevard Property and forward to the Oversight Board for Approval. RESOLUTION NO. 14-164 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REGARDING THE CONDITIONAL CONVEYANCE TO LDC COUGAR, LLC AND CHURCH HAVEN, LLC OF PROPERTY PURSUANT TO THE APPROVED AMENDED LONG-RANGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PLAN MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Michael, to approve the minutes. Motion carried 5-0. L. CONSENT CALENDAR - SUCCESSOR AGENCY L1. Approval of Minutes: August 20, 2014 Minutes (Regular Meeting) MOTION: Moved by Steinorth, seconded by Michael, to approve the minutes. Motion carried 5-0. * DRAFT * September 2, 2014 1 Special Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority, City Council Meetings I City of Rancho Cucamonga I Minutes I Page 3 of 6 M. CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL M1. Approval of Minutes: August 20, 2014 (Regular Meeting) M2. Approval of Check Register dated August 13, 2014 through August 26, 2014 for the total of $6,248,492.64. M3. Approval to declare surplus City owned miscellaneous vehicles and equipment, office equipment, and computer equipment as surplus. M4. Approval of a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, adopting the Measure "I" Five-Year Capital Improvement Program and Improvement Plan Expenditure Strategy for Measure "I" funds covering Fiscal Years 2014/2019. RESOLUTION NO. 14-161 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE MEASURE "I" FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM COVERING FISCAL YEARS 2014/2019 AND IMPROVEMENT PLAN EXPENDITURE STRATEGY FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF MEASURE "I" FUNDS. M5. Approval of Joint Use Agreement and Right of Entry Agreement for acquisition of real property identified as San Bernardino Tax Assessor's Parcel Numbers: 0225-12-204 and 0225-13-120 with Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWDSC) and certification of addendum to final Environmental Impact Report certified December 11, 2011 as part of Wilson Avenue Extension and Rehabilitation Project, and to approve an appropriation of $118,400 to Account No. 11243035650/1515124-0 from Transportation Fund balance. M6. Approval of Master Plan Transportation Facility Reimbursement Agreement, SRA-60, in conjunction with the development of Tract 17651, located on the south side of Banyan Street east of East Avenue, submitted by K. Hovnanian at Andalusia, LLC, and approval to appropriate $84,154.65 from Transportation Fund Balance to Account No. 1124303-5650/1026124-0. RESOLUTION NO. 14-162 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MASTER PLAN TRANSPORTATION FACILITY REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR A TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT BANYAN STREET AND GOLDEN LOCK PLACE FOR TRACT 17651, SRA-60 M7. Accept the Fiscal Year 2013/2014 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation — Overlay of Various Streets project, Contract No. 14-072 as complete, release the bonds, accept a maintenance bond, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $390,919.32. RESOLUTION NO. 14-163 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2013/2014 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION—OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 14-072, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK * DRAFT * September 2, 2014 1 Special Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority, City Council Meetings I City of Rancho Cucamonga I Minutes I Page 4 of 6 M8. Approval of an agreement between the City and San Bernardino County Flood Control District for a study of the San Sevaine Basin for the proposed Youngs Canyon Road extension and approval of an appropriation in the amount of$75,000 to Account No. 18132035650/1601813-0 from Assessment District 88-2 Fund Balance. Mg. Approve an appropriation of $481,000 to Account No. 11243035650/1515124-0 from Transportation Fund balance for a 5-year monitoring strategy to study the small mammal usage of the two wildlife crossings being constructed with the Wilson Avenue Extension Project from East Avenue to Wardman Bullock Road. This monitoring strategy is a requirement of the Army Corps of Engineer's 404 Permit to be obtained for the project. M10. Approval of Amendment No. 1 to the Cooperative Agreement between the Inland Empire Utility Agency and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the relocation of reclaimed Water Facilities in conjunction with the Interstate 15 at Base Line Road Interchange Project. M11. Accept improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond and file a notice of completion for improvements for Tract 16320, located on Rocky Mountain Court, north of Woodridge Drive, submitted by FH, II, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 14-165 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA,ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16320 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK City Manager Gillison removed Item M3 from the agenda. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams,to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports. Motion carried 5-0. N. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS - CITY The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. N1. Disposition of Inspection and Permit Fees for FY 14-15. - Fire RESOLUTION NO. FD 14-044 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, WAIVING THE COLLECTION OF SPECIFIC FEES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014-15. Rob Ball, Fire Marshall, presented the staff report. Councilmember Steinorth inquired about the program. In response Fire Marshall Ball reported that the cost for permits is about $700,000 per year. The recurrent fees and the inspection fees are waived, which saves the businesses about $750,000 per year. Councilmember Alexander indicated this program benefited the community and our businesses. Mayor Michael indicated his support for this program. MOTION: Moved by Steinorth, seconded by Alexander, to adopt Resolution No. FD 14-044. Motion carried 5-0. * DRAFT * September 2, 2014 1 Special Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority, City Council Meetings I City of Rancho Cucamonga I Minutes I Page 5 of 6 N2. Approve conceptual design for rehabilitation and the refilling of Red Hill Park Lake and authorize staff to develop bid documents. —City Mark Steuer, City Engineer, presented the staff report. In response to Councilmember Steinorth, the outreach program will encourage the community not to leave wildlife at the lake and how to keep it clean. Councilmember Spagnolo indicated that perhaps video cameras should be installed at the lake. Councilmembers Alexander, Williams and Mayor Michael stated their support and indicated that the community will be happy with the outcome of the lake. MOTION: Moved by Spagnolo,seconded by Williams,to approve the staff recommendation in the staff report. Motion carried 5-0. O. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. 01. INTER-AGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.) No updates were identified. 02. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) Mayor Michael announced that earlier this year, a group from the City went to Sacramento to speak with some State legislators on bills regarding medical marijuana and massage parlors. He reported that the massage parlor bill will help cities to regulate massage parlors within the City. Mayor Michael thanked Assembly members Bonilla and Holden for bring these bills forward. Councilmember Alexander thanked the Anti-Car group for their work on the old service station north of Archibald Ave and west of Foothill Blvd along Route 66. This group is holding car shows with the next one being on October 11, 2014. P. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING No items were identified. Q. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Adrian Garcia, CIVIC Assistant City Clerk Approved: * DRAFT * September 2, 2014 1 Special Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority, City Council Meetings I City of Rancho Cucamonga I Minutes I Page 6 of 6 September 3, 2014 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY, AND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meetings A. CALL TO ORDER The regular meetings of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council were cancelled. All items of business for these agendas were rescheduled for the September 2, 2014 special meetings. Respectfully submitted, Debra L. McNay, MMC Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager Approved: * DRAFT * CANCELLED I September 3, 2014 1 Fire Protection District Board, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority, City Council Meetings City of Rancho Cucamonga I Regular Meetings Minutes I Page 1 of 1 )3- „Nr/1/4„ ._ _ RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA Proclamation WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is committed to education and enrichment programs, like the Boy Scouts of America, that serve to better our community; and WHEREAS, Jacob Fakhoury, an Eagle Scout candidate and a junior in high school, is completing his Eagle Scout Project requirements; and WHEREAS, Jacob Fakhoury has utilized $1,000 in funding, that he acquired through fundraising, to identify and label the water wise plants in the model landscaping project at the Hellman Fire Station 177 as his service project; and WHEREAS, Jacob Fakhoury has made upwards to 20 different signs identifying each individual plant with description and plant species, as well as including the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District logo. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby commend Jacob Fakhoury, Eagle Scout candidate, for his outstanding dedication and a job well done. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, have hereunto set their hand and caused the seal of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to be affixed this 17" day of September, 2014. . Dennis Michae Mayor ' � ae . Sam Spa!f 01. William J. Al ander i � ,"�,� 6 a Mayor Pro Te Council ember o. .', J`li ��t�T�-� odd Clas:Comm Marc Steinorth Diane Williams Council Member Council Member i 4 4• , O —1 f I xo 1^ ` y 14 4i, 4 ili z ....., ••.... z -b-zsa° ID o CC U o t "j be , co �� � U 0 4 E ICI U iir.c , , O lyi ieII CiA +y o Z O O CiA 2 W ux • , , 7 . E d g CS s R a* •'- ~ V yc. 1-'' ~ ``� 3 d ti U co ! U/� ti' ` j at 1,a -___,-),----Z\75' ,_. a fik4 (------ _AA ___,, . ______ \ -3C ) it• ' 1 --_ -'‘L___"\P- -} Kg RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA Proclamation WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is committed to fostering the educational enrichment and achievement of adults in our community; and WHEREAS, the California Library Literacy Service (CLLS) was formed in September 1984 as part of the California State Library; and WHEREAS, literacy skills for all of our country's citizens is vital to the acquisition of knowledge and to their personal growth; and WHEREAS, CLLS provides both funding and program support for over 100 free library adult literacy programs in California, including the Rancho Cucamonga Library's Adult Literacy program for the past sixteen years; and WHEREAS, the support provided by CLLS enables the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library's Adult Literacy program to engage over 100 volunteer tutors who devote over 1, 700 hours helping over 130 citizens each year in elevating their skills in computer literacy, and speaking, reading, and writing of English; WHEREAS, International Literacy Day is celebrated each year on September 8`h to focus attention on the 800 million people throughout the world who are unable to read and still need our help, and on the many successes would-wide in combating low literacy skills. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby declare the month of September as Adult Literacy Awareness Month in honor of the California Library Literary Service and International Literacy Day. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, have hereunto set their hand and caused the seal of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to be affixed this 17'h day of September, 2014. • del 1 --„ice . Dennis Michae Mayor / /� 8501 SS,. /_%a, �(�jCa-,off. 4k, . Sam Spal of / William J. Alt ander A, ' ”" ��(( , ��Ic Mayor Pro Te' Council ember r ::::Nir r "dc.==coF"' Marc Steinorth Diane Williams Council Member Council Member 1 ' t - ' i r 1.. -;-',12.' • _ . 4 ar 3 C Q a) = W m er W U ._ o N L O C 03 U. _ 3 <I J Z� a I— a a [ z a ) F5 w z U) W 0) . w w 0) W C : aJ t � V CC °C as .5 W >a er N _ a 2 ~ O N z � W 0 0 v Ci co a — W z as CI i m O o >, aZ a z a a in . m Y J /....,'"!!'-:, , RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIBRARY SERVICES � 8c LIBRARY FOUNDATION PRESENTS �4. ∎ - X \ �s NI Frida y, Se .�p t. 19 7-9pm FREE Biane Library @Victoria Gardens 12505 Cultural Center Drive Live music, storytelling, crafts, and games Fun for the whole family! FREE Tickets available starting August 29 @ both libraries le1 l 909.477.2720 x5076 or x5007 i • \tc. -'" .'" ---._ 4,t ,.. , e _ \\ _`� /. .,• /' L� \' -tip --_-I f > A _ __ , _ _ _ , ........... A Ai. / , _ __. ____ , Iiiiiiri' .-:_,.., _ sN. r i1 �` - —�: ..-.-- - - -7:7 - s -r Celebrate 20 years of Award-Winning City Library Services Friday September 26, 2014 7:00 pm Rancho Cucamonga Public Library ti 7368 Archibald Avenue ly' a r • t�%. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 r •, �• Parking for the evening at 1�. ._l First Baptist Church t$ "t" 7450 Archibald Avenue 4 44111111 !' s IIBR VICES � U" BRArf C 441 km J.0 ! ? a 4 c?4)C4rcn4 0-\-• G4•oRari• ■r ,!!��cuc,,M°04" Join us on Friday September 26, 2014 7:00 pm to Celebrate 20 years of Award-Winning City Library Service Rancho Cucamonga Public Library 7368 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 909.477.2720 Enjoy music, storytelling,game booths and activities for the whole family while learning about the history of the Library. Parking on September 26 available at First Baptist Church,7450 Archibald Avenue Drive south on Archibald,the second right after Library Parking Lot 10 y m VICiORIR GRADERS CULTURRL CERJLR FOLLOUJED ! J flFTER PflRTy IR iRE LIURRRy ffflT R I f�� Roi GI zx� y GflRII1 GILfflG 1T10RT€G LflU ID f Gfl1U mill UIORLO PREMIER OF 'PRA9ER' AD ACCLAIMED POET ADD FORMER TER CARIRMAD DADA 61010 ROD GILFR9 AD IDT[ROATIODALL9 AEDOMDEO OPERA 8041100E CARIA GILFR9 JUILLARD SCHOOL COACERT ARTIST 10001E0 LOURIDSEA COMPOSER DATIODAL MEDAL FOR THE ARTS UIIODER A SPECIAL [110106 ADD A 016AT TO REMEMBER. . . $15 IDCLUOES PERFORMADCE ADD AFTER PARTS IDCLUDIDG DESSERT ROD AEVERAGES FILL PROCEEDS 0101111 THE RRDCHO CUCAM000A 11000119 RAN H 4 IB- •R,hGHO :GCAMGNG A �o, i •�'r FOR MORE IDFOAIOA1IOU: 909.411.2720 5040 'INLETS VYAILAOLE THROUGH VICTORIA G11ROE00 CULTURAL EERIER BOX OFFICE 909.477 2775 ADD OD F00HDATIOD UIEBSITE 011111 PAUPAI WWIU.CIT9OFRC US/FDUBO0TIOH 12505 CULTURAL CEDTEA DRIVE AAOCHO CUCA111011GA CA 91139 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P1 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 8/27/2014 through 9/9/2014 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00350713 08/27/2014 8TH ST.COLLISION 610.02 0.00 . 610.02 AP 00350714 08/27/2014 A&V SOFTBALL 3,213.00 0.00 3,213.00 AP 00350715 08/27/2014 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 79.40 0.00 79.40 AP 00350716 08/27/2014 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 6,201.08 0.00 6,201.08 AP 00350717 08/27/2014 AJANEL,JUAN 10.00 0.00 10.00 AP 00350718 08/27/2014 ALL CITIES TOOLS 0.00 803.68 803.68 AP 00350719 08/27/2014 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC. 1,495.77 0.00 1,495.77 AP 00350720 08/27/2014 ALLEN,DEBORAH 45.81 0.00 45.81 AP 00350721 08/27/2014 ALPHAGRAPI-IICS 22.68 0.00 22.68 AP 00350722 08/27/2014 AMERICAN TRAFFIC PRODUCTS INC 476.82 0.00 476.82 AP 00350723 08/27/2014 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 220.24 0.00 220.24 AP 00350724 08/27/2014 AROCHO,ALMA 888.00 0.00 888.00 AP 00350725 08/27/2014 ASPA 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00350726 08/27/2014 ASST SECURITY 710.00 0.00 710.00 AP 00350727 08/27/2014 ASST SECURITY 4,800.00 0.00 4,800.00 AP 00350728 08/27/2014 AT&T MOBILITY 0.00 72.53 72.53 AP 00350729 08/27/2014 AVANTS,MARGE 255.00 0.00 255.00 AP 00350730 08/27/2014 BC TRAFFIC SPECIALISTS 650.12 0.00 650.12 AP 00350731 08/27/2014 BERNELL HYDRAULICS INC 478.69 0.00 478.69 AP 00350732 08/27/2014 BHAT"I'I,SATINDERJIT S. 50.55 0.00 50.55 AP 00350733 08/27/2014 BILLINGS.TOM 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00350734 08/27/2014 CALBO 1,320.00 0.00 1,320.00 AP 00350735 08/27/2014 CALIFORNIA LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 270.00 0.00 270.00 AP 00350736 08/27/2014 CALIFORNIA PEACE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION 50.00 0.00 50.00 AP 00350737 08/27/2014 CAMPOS XCLUSIVE 1,750.00 0.00 1,750.00 AP 00350738 08/27/2014 CAPIO 225.00 0.00 225.00 AP 00350739 08/27/2014 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 78.07 452.77 530.84 `•* AP 00350740 08/27/2014 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 260.77 517.69 778.46"' AP 00350741 08/27/2014 CINTAS CORP:#150 1,672.82 0.00 1,672.82 AP 00350742 08/27/2014 CIRIACKS,VALERIE ANN 150.00 0.00 150.00 AP 00350743 08/27/2014 CITY RENTALS 133.50 0.00 133.50 AP 00350744 08/27/2014 CLARION CONSTRUCTION INC 15,000.00 0.00 15,000.00 AP 00350745 08/27/2014 CLARK, KAREN 684.00 0.00 684.00 AP 00350746 08/27/2014 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 818.15 0.00 818.15 AP 00350747 08/27/2014 CLEAN ENERGY 594.00 0.00 594.00 AP 00350748 08/27/2014 CLEAR COAST INC 160.00 0.00 160.00 AP 00350749 08/27/2014 CLEARWATER GRAPHICS INC 752.94 0.00 752.94 AP 00350750 08/27/2014 COCHERELL, DOREEN 86.40 0.00 86.40 AP 00350751 08/27/2014 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC 449.06 0.00 449.06 AP 00350752 08/27/2014 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 4,830.97 0.00 4,830.97 AP 00350753 08/27/2014 CURRY, KAREN FIX 514.92 0.00 514.92 AP 00350754 08/27/2014 CYBERTECH SYSTEMS& SOFTWARE INC. 2,000.00 0.00 2,000.00 AP 00350755 08/27/2014 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 390.96 0.00 390.96 AP 00350756 08/27/2014 D.R.HORTON LOS ANGELES HOLDING CO. 20,000.00 0.00 20,000.00 AP 00350757 08/27/2014 DENA,KEEGAN 0.00 450.00 450.00 AP 00350758 08/27/2014 DOLLARHIDE,GINGER 96.00 0.00 96.00 AP 00350759 08/27/2014 DOWNEY,JENNIFER 11.07 0.00 11.07 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: I Current Date: 09/10/2014 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:36:59 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P2 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 8/27/2014 through 9/9/2014 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00350760 08/27/2014 DUGUAY,JOE 52.92 0.00 52.92 AP 00350761 08/27/2014 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 535.62 0.00 535.62 AP 00350762 08/27/2014 DUNN,ANN MARIE 612.00 0.00 612.00 AP 00350763 08/27/2014 EARLEY. IDA 207.00 0.00 207.00 AP 00350764 08/27/2014 EAS'I'ERLING, RAY 297.60 0.00 297.60 AP 00350765 08/27/2014 ECONOLITE CONTROL PRODUCTS INC 25,491.25 0.00 25,491.25 AP 00350766 08/27/2014 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 19,628.00 0.00 19,628.00 AP 00350767 08/27/2014 ENVIRONMENTAL EQUIPMENT SUPPLY(EES) 837.50 0.00 837.50 AP 00350768 08/27/2014 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 51.06 0.00 51.06 AP 00350769 08/27/2014 FELICIANO,ANTHONY 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00350770 08/27/2014 FH II !LC 20,000.00 0.00 20,000.00 AP 00350771 08/27/2014 FITZGERALD,MIKE 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00350772 08/27/2014 FLAG SYSTEMS INC. 313.20 0.00 313.20 AP 00350773 08/27/2014 FLEET SERVICES INC. 0.00 83.64 83.64 AP 00350774 08/27/2014 FLELTPRIDE 422.11 0.00 422.11 Al' 00350775 08/27/2014 FRAZEE PAINT CENTER 55.57 0.00 55.57 AP 00350776 08/27/2014 GOLDEN STAR TECHNOLOGY INC 1,255.81 0.00 1,255.81 AP 00350777 08/27/2014 GOOD YEAR SOCCER LEAGUE 1,247.00 0.00 1,247.00 AI' 00350778 08/27/2014 GOODYEAR* 930.73 0.00 930.73 AP 00350779 08/27/2014 GOSS, ROBERT 0.00 292.12 292.12 AP 00350780 08/27/2014 GRAFFITI TRACKER INC 2,250.00 0.00 2,250.00 AP 00350781 08/27/2014 GRAINGER 421.87 • 0.00 421.87 AP 00350782 08/27/2014 GRAPHICS FACTORY INC. 299.70 0.00 299.70 AP 00350783 08/27/2014 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 2,215.97 0.00 2,215.97 AP 00350784 08/27/2014 HAIGHT BROWN& BONESTEEL LLP 131.10 0.00 131.10 AP 00350785 08/27/2014 HALL. KEVIN 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00350786 08/27/2014 HAMILTON,MONIQUE 960.00 0.00 960.00 AP 00350787 08/27/2014 HAMPTON YOGA 816.00 0.00 816.00 AP 00350788 08/27/2014 HERITAGE EDUCATION GROUP 753.00 0.00 753.00 AP 00350789 08/27/2014 HERNANDEZ, ELAINE 155.20 0.00 155.20 AP 00350790 08/27/2014 HOME DEPOT'CREDIT SERVICES 645 210.59 0.00 210.59 AP 00350791 08/27/2014 HOSE MAN INC 311.72 28.57 340.29*** Al' 00350792 08/27/2014 HOTSY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 45.00 0.00 45.00 AP 00350793 08/27/2014 HOYT LUMI3ER CO.,SM 0.00 19.68 19.68 AP 00350794 08/27/2014 INLAND PRESORT&MAILING SERVICES 47.58 0.00 47.58 AP 00350795 08/27/2014 INTERACTIVE DATA CORPORATION 110.23 0.00 110.23 AP 00350796 08/27/2014 JONES AND MAYER,LAW OFFICES OF 18,119.56 0.00 18,119.56 AP 00350797 08/27/2014 JOSEFSON,RICHARD 627.00 0.00 627.00 AP 00350798 08/27/2014 KATONA,ROGER 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00350799 08/27/2014 KB HOME 2.20 0.00 2.20 AP 00350800 08/27/2014 KUSSMAUL ELECTRONICS CO 319.64 0.00 319.64 AP 00350801 08/27/2014 KVAC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 0.00 50.00 50.00 AP 00350802 08/27/2014 L S A ASSOCIA'T'ES INC 0.00 399.24 399.24 AP 00350803 08/27/2014 LANDORF,RICHARD 0.00 200.00 200.00 AP 00350804 08/27/2014 LAW OFFICES OF KATHY M GANDARA 1,754.41 0.00 1,754.41 AP 00350805 08/27/2014 LIEI3ERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 6,285.00 0.00 6,285.00 AP 00350806 08/27/2014 1.0E13,STEPIIANIE 78.00 0.00 78.00 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 2 Current Date: 09/10/2014 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:36:59 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA p3 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 8/27/2014 through 9/9/2014 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00350807 08/27/2014 LOPEZ,GUILLERMO 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00350808 08/27/2014 MAIN STREET SIGNS 3,996.00 0.00 3,996.00 AP 00350809 08/27/2014 MARLINK SA INC 0.00 162.00 162.00 AP 00350810 08/27/2014 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00 0.00 45.00 AP 00350811 08/27/2014 MARY S ROBERTS SPAY/NEUTER CLINIC 125.00 0.00 125.00 AP 00350812 08/27/2014 MASON AND MASON REAL ESTATE APPRAISERS CON 10,073.36 0.00 10,073.36 AP 00350813 08/27/2014 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 46.66 0.00 46.66 AP 00350814 08/27/2014 MEINEKE CAR CARE CENTER 57.66 0.00 57.66 AP 00350815 08/27/2014 MIDWEST TAPE 257.91 0.00 257.91 AP 00350816 08/27/2014 MIGHTY MOVERS TRAILERS INC 156.06 0.00 156.06 AP 00350817 08/27/2014 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 0.00 1,038.00 1,038.00 AP 00350818 08/27/2014 MILANETTO.MARSHA 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00350819 08/27/2014 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC&ELECTRONICS USA INC 610.98 0.00 610.98 AP 00350820 08/27/2014 MK AUTO DETAIL INC 0.00 140.00 140.00 AP 00350821 08/27/2014 MORRILL,EVAN 50.00 0.00 50.00 AP 00350822 08/27/2014 NAPA AUTO PARTS 0.00 177.97 177.97 AP 00350823 08/27/2014 NASCO 0.00 956.57 956.57 AP 00350824 08/27/2014 NEXTEL 0.00 162.97 162.97 AP 00350825 08/27/2014 NPI PRODUCTION SERVICES INC 33,800.00 0.00 33,800.00 AP 00350826 08/27/2014 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 2,580.35 0.00 2,580.35 AP 00350827 08/27/2014 OCLC INC 532.06 0.00 532.06 AP 00350828 08/27/2014 OFFICE DEPOT 2,959.28 0.00 2,959.28 AP 00350829 08/27/2014 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 255.57 0.00 255.57 AP 00350830 08/27/2014 OPSTAD,KIRSTEN 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00350831 08/27/2014 ORONA,PATRICIA 775.00 0.00 775.00 AP 00350832 08/27/2014 OTT,LAURA 840.00 0.00 840.00 AP 00350833 08/27/2014 OTT,SHARON 486.00 0.00 486.00 AP 00350834 08/27/2014 PARS 3,500.00 0.00 3,500.00 AP 00350835 08/27/2014 PATTON SALES CORP 25.38 0.00 25.38 AP 00350836 08/27/2014 PEP BOYS 67.81 0.00 67.81 AP 00350837 08/27/2014 PERRY C THOMAS CONSTRUCTION 1.000,00 0.00 1,000.00 AP 00350838 08/27/2014 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 2,121.20 0.00 2,121.20 AP 00350839 08/27/2014 PH&S PRODUCTS LLC 0.00 1,180.00 1,180.00 AP 00350840 08/27/2014 PITNEY BOWES 207.36 0.00 207.36 AP 00350841 08/27/2014 PREMIER WORLD DISCOVERY LLC 5,898.00 0.00 5,898.00 AP 00350842 08/27/2014 PRO SALES GROUP INC 587.73 0.00 587.73 AP 00350843 08/27/2014 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 3,329.05 0.00 3,329.05 AP 00350844 08/27/2014 RAINEY,LATREACE 585.00 0.00 585.00 AP 00350845 08/27/2014 RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY&ARTS FOUND. 20,574.00 0.00 20,574.00 AP 00350846 08/27/2014 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 97.20 0.00 97.20 AP 00350847 08/27/2014 RED WING SHOE STORE 1,743.99 0.00 1,743.99 AP 00350848 08/27/2014 RED WING SHOE STORE 2,061.78 0.00 2,061.78 AP 00350849 08/27/2014 RED WING SHOE STORE 142.88 0.00 142.88 AP 00350850 08/27/2014 REHABWEST INC 356.06 0.00 356.06 AP 00350851 08/27/2014 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSIION 21,444.60 0.00 21,444.60 AP 00350852 08/27/2014 RIOS.ARNIE 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00350853 08/27/2014 RIPPETOE LAW P C 8,943.36 0.00 8,943.36 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 3 Current Date: 09/10/2014 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I. Time: 15:36:59 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P4 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 8/27/2014 through 9/9/2014 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00350854 08/27/2014 RIVERA,ROXANA AND JUAN 7.56 0.00 7.56 AP 00350855 08/27/2014 ROBLES,RAUL P 175.00 0.00 175.00 AP 00350856 08/27/2014 RODRIGUEZ INC,R Y 819.06 1,555.47 2,374.53*** AP 00350857 08/27/2014 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY EDA 0.00 146.00 146.00 AP 00350858 08/27/2014 SAN BERNARDINO CTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 55,143.75 0.00 55,143.75 AP 00350859 08/27/2014 SENECHAL,CALVIN 596.40 0.00 596.40 AP 00350860 08/27/2014 SHOETERIA 2,538.42 0.00 2,538.42 AP 00350861 08/27/2014 SHRED IT 99.60 0.00 99.60 AP 00350862 08/27/2014 SHRED PROS 0.00 45.00 45.00 AP 00350863 08/27/2014 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 2,324.95 0.00 2,324.95 AP 00350864 08/27/2014 SIPIIOMSAY,SID 24.84 0.00 24.84 AP 00350865 08/27/2014 SMART AND FINAL 0.00 80.27 80.27 AP 00350866 08/27/2014 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,057.89 167.98 1,225.87*** AP 00350872 08/27/2014 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22,107.22 4,727.88 26,835.10*** AP 00350873 08/27/2014 SOUTHLAND FARMERS MARKET ASSOC INC 774.00 0.00 774.00 AP 00350874 08/27/2014 SPARKLETTS 76.00 0.00 76.00 AP 00350875 08/27/2014 STAPLETON,JOSHUA 0.00 200.10 200.10 AP 00350876 08/27/2014 STRATEGIC ECONOMICS 3,426.87 0.00 3,426.87 AP 00350877 08/27/2014 'IERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 0.00 351.00 351.00 AP 00350878 08/27/2014 THOMPSON PLUMBING SUPPLY 164.62 0.00 164.62 AP 00350879 08/27/2014 THOMPSON,MAITIE 78.00 0.00 78.00 AP 00350880 08/27/2014 TMS MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES 0.00 427.00 427.00 AP 00350881 08/27/2014 TRACEY,VAL 552.00 0.00 552.00 AP 00350882 08/27/2014 U.S.BANK PARS ACCT#6746022500 1,034.36 0.00 1,034.36 AP 00350883 08/27/2014 U.S.BANK PARS ACCT#6746022500 16,851.22 0.00 16,851.22 AP 00350884 08/27/2014 UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SO CAL 420.00 0.00 420.00 AP 00350885 08/27/2014 UNITED ROTARY BRUSH CORPORATION 1,170.87 0.00 1,170.87 AP 00350886 08/27/2014 UPS 74.02 0.00 74.02 AP 00350887 08/27/2014 VALLEY POWER SYSTEMS INC 0.00 8,063.58 8,063.58 AP 00350888 08/27/2014 VAN SCOYOC ASSOCIATES INC 4,000.00 0.00 4,000.00 AP 00350889 08/27/2014 VECCHIO,TOM 244.00 0.00 244.00 AP 00350890 08/27/2014 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 37.03 0.00 37.03 AP 00350892 08/27/2014 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 4,316.38 2,584.52 6,900.90*** AP 00350893 08/27/2014 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 654.78 0.00 654.78 AP 00350894 08/27/2014 WARREN&CO INC,CARL 530.96 0.00 530.96 AP 00350895 08/27/2014 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,872.20 4,117.62 5,989.82 *** AP 00350896 08/27/2014 WESTCOAST MEDIA 900.50 0.00 900.50 AP 00350897 08/27/2014 WOLFROM,RENEE 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00350898 08/27/2014 WORD MILL PUBLISHING 750.00 0.00 750.00 AP 00350899 08/27/2014 ZEE MEDICAL INC 196.76 0.00 196.76 AP 00350900 08/28/2014 BRUCE,INGRID 33.00 0.00 33.00 AP 00350901 08/28/2014 BRUCE,INGRID 712.91 0.00 712.91 AP 00350902 08/28/2014 GUERRA,KELLY 0.00 133.00 133.00 AP 00350903 08/28/2014 PARSAC 0.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 AP 00350904 08/28/2014 AGILINE LLC 4,000.00 0.00 4,000.00 AP 00350905 08/28/2014 AUTO BODY 2000 1,358.34 0.00 1,358.34 AP 00350909 08/28/2014 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 112,468.11 1,432.23 113,900.34*** User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 4 Current Date: 09/10/2014 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:36:59 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P5 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 8/27/2014 through 9/9/2014 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00350910 08/28/2014 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 729.12 0.00 729.12 AP 00350911 08/28/2014 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 6,051.60 0.00 6,051.60 AP 00350912 08/28/2014 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 1,536.12 125.74 1,661.86"' AP 00350913 08/28/2014 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 387.46 0.00 387.46 AP 00350914 08/28/2014 KME FIRE APPARATUS - 0.00 5,028.34 5,028.34 AP 00350915 08/28/2014 LIMS AUTO INC 7,271.29 0.00 7,271.29 AP 00350916 08/28/2014 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 1,620.66 0.00 1,620.66 AP 00350917 08/28/2014 SUNRISE FORD 829.13 0.00 829.13 Al' 00350918 08/28/2014 TOMARK SPORTS INC 1,154.14 0.00 1,154.14 AP 00350919 08/28/2014 TW TELECOM 1,408.20 0.00 1,408.20 AP 00350920 08/28/2014 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 0.00 23.17 23.17 • AP 00350921 08/28/2014 VISTA PAINT 2,838.33 0.00 2,838.33 AP 00350922 09/03/2014 ACEY DECY EQUIPMENT INC. 39.60 0.00 39.60 AP 00350923 09/03/2014 ACTION CHEMICAL COMPANY 1,111.23 0.00 1,111.23 AP 00350924 09/03/2014 ACTIVE NETWORK,THE 31,112.00 0.00 31,112.00 AP 00350925 09/03/2014 ADVANCED UTILITY SYSTEMS CORP. 905.04 0.00 905.04 AP 00350926 09/03/2014 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 79.40 0.00 79.40 AP 00350927 09/03/2014 AGUILERA.ISAIAH 2,300.00 0.00 2,300.00 Al' 00350928 09/03/2014 ALLIANCE BUS LINES INC 13,578.90 0.00 13,578.90 AP 00350929 09/03/2014 ALLIED BARTON SECURITY SERVICES LLC 24,081.25 0.00 24.081.25 Al' 00350930 09/03/2014 AMERICAN ASPHALT SOUTH INC 14,787.40 0.00 14.787.40 AP 00350931 09/03/2014 AMERICAN SCALE CO INC 0.00 351.00 351.00 Al' 00350932 09/03/2014 ARMSTRONG CLAREMONT 427.38 0.00 427.38 AP 00350933 09/03/2014 ASSI SECURITY 335.00 0.00 335.00 AP 00350934 09/03/2014 AUTO AND RV SPECIALISTS INC. 49.65 0.00 49.65 AP 00350935 09/03/2014 BABE INC. 24,000.00 0.00 24,000.00 AP 00350936 09/03/2014 BLINDS ETC. 305.64 0.00 305.64 AP 00350937 09/03/2014 BRAUN BLAISING MCLAUGHLIN 5,608.81 0.00 5,608.81 AP 00350938 09/03/2014 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 498.90 0.00 498.90 AP 00350939 09/03/2014 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 186.75 0.00 186.75 Al' 00350940 09/03/2014 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 50.00 0.00 50.00 AP 00350941 09/03/2014 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 55.00 0.00 55.00 AP 00350942 09/03/2014 CAPIO 225.00 0.00 225.00 AP 00350943 09/03/2014 CAPIO 225.00 • 0.00 225.00 AP 00350944 09/03/2014 CASTANEDA III,ABEL 0.00 120.00 120.00 AP 00350945 09/03/2014 CITY RENTALS 296.50 0.00 296.50 AP 00350946 09/03/2014 COAST RECREATION INC 2,858.20 0.00 2,858.20 AP 00350947 09/03/2014 COBB,ALONZO 128.00 0.00 128.00 AP 00350948 09/03/2014 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC 187.92 0.00 187.92 AP 00350949 09/03/2014 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 772.00 0.00 772.00 AP 00350950 09/03/2014 COVE JURUPA AQUATIC CENTER.THE 3,174.00 0.00 3,174.00 AP 00350951 09/03/2014 COVERT,MICHAEL 180.00 0.00 180.00 AP 00350952 09/03/2014 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 637.20 0.00 637.20 AP 00350953 09/03/2014 DELTA DENTAL 1,469.88 0.00 1,469.88 AP 00350954 09/03/2014 DELTA DENTAL 39,586.50 0.00 39,586.50 AP 00350955 09/03/2014 DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELA'T'IONS 675.00 0.00 675.00 AP 00350956 09/03/2014 EDWARD PROFESSIONAL ADVISIORS 937.50 0.00 937.50 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 5 Current Date: 09/10/2014 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:36:59 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P6 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 8/27/2014 through 9/9/2014 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00350957 09/03/2014 ENVIROMET 0.00 1,857.00 1.857,00 AP 00350958 09/03/2014 ETIWANDA CLASSICS LLC 48.39 0.00 48.39 AP 00350959 09/03/2014 FCLO MUSIC THEATRE 475.00 0.00 475.00 AP 00350960 09/03/2014 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 78.87 0.00 78.87 AP 00350961 09/03/2014 FIELDS,MICHELLE 28.00 0.00 28.00 AP 00350962 09/03/2014 FIRE ETC. 0.00 2,211.60 2,211.60 AP 00350963 09/03/2014 FLATIRON ELECTRIC GROUP INC 10,279.45 0.00 10,279.45 AP 00350964 09/03/2014 FLEET SERVICES INC. 0.00 119.75 119.75 AP 00350965 09/03/2014 F'OLKENS,KIMBERLI 398.71 0.00 398.71 AP 00350966 09/03/2014 GARCIA,KYLA 180.00 0.00 180.00 AP 00350967 09/03/2014 GOINS,GALE 64.00 0.00 64.00 AP 00350968 09/03/2014 GONSALVES AND SON,JOE A 3,045.00 0.00 3,045.00 AP 00350969 09/03/2014 GONZALES,BRIAN 77.00 0.00 77.00 AP 00350970 09/03/2014 GRACIANO,TAMMIE 0.00 85.00 85.00 AP 00350971 09/03/2014 GRAINGER 756.97 870.81 1,627.78*** AP 00350972 09/03/2014 HABER,JULIE 210.00 0.00 210.00 AP 00350973 09/03/2014 HERITAGE EDUCA'T'ION GROUP 394.00 0.00 394.00 AP 00350974 09/03/2014 HMC ARCHITECTS 0.00 20,250.00 20,250.00 AP 00350975 09/03/2014 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 645 575.63 0.00 575.63 AP 00350976 09/03/2014 HOSE MAN INC 16.34 0.00 16.34 AP 00350977 09/03/2014 HOYT LUMBER CO.,SM 0.00 19.01 19.01 AP 00350978 09/03/2014 INTERNATIONAL LINE BUILDERS INC 254,321.18 0.00 254,321.18 AP 00350979 09/03/2014 JACOBSEN WEST 199.41 0.00 199.41 AP 00350980 09/03/2014 JAN WAY COMPANY USA INC 478.00 0.00 478.00 AP 00350981 09/03/2014 JDC INC 66,425.40 0.00 66,425.40 AP 00350982 09/03/2014 JOBS AVAILABLE INC 273.00 0.00 273.00 AP 00350983 09/03/2014 JONES AND MAYER,LAW OFFICES OF 0.00 560.00 560.00 AP 00350984 09/03/2014 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 182,650.52 0.00 182,650.52 AP 00350985 09/03/2014 KONE INC 613.67 0.00 613.67 AP 00350986 09/03/2014 KUBZANSKY,JESSICA 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00350987 09/03/2014 KUBZANSKY,JESSICA 1,067.00 0.00 1,067.00 AP 00350988 09/03/2014 LOPEZ,ANGEL 350.00 0.00 350.00 AP 00350989 09/03/2014 LOUIE'S NURSERY 135.00 0.00 135.00 AP 00350990 09/03/2014 MACIAS,SAL 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00350991 09/03/2014 MAIN STREET SIGNS 561.38 0.00 561.38 AP 00350992 09/03/2014 MANUEL,MICHAEL 180.00 0.00 180.00 AP 00350993 09/03/2014 MATERIAL SALES UNLIMITED 975.57 0.00 975.57 AP 00350994 09/03/2014 MCFARLAND,YVONNE 65.00 0.00 65.00 AP 00350995 09/03/2014 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 110.48 0.00 110.48 AP 00350996 09/03/2014 MEINEKE CAR CARE CENTER 1,306.80 0.00 1,306.80 AP 00350997 09/03/2014 MIDWEST TAPE 153.94 0.00 153.94 AP 00350998 09/03/2014 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 27,951.84 0.00 27,951.84 AP 00350999 09/03/2014 MMASC 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00351000 09/03/2014 MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR INC 5.24 0.00 5.24 AP 00351001 09/03/2014 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 321.19 0.00 321.19 AP 00351002 09/03/2014 ODIMEGWU,SANDRA 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 AP 00351003 09/03/2014 OFFICE DEPOT 2,183.16 0.00 2,183.16 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 6 Current Date: 09/10/2014 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:36:59 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P7 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 8/27/2014 through 9/9/2014 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00351004 09/03/2014 OLSON,BUZZ 304.00 0.00 304.00 AP 00351005 09/03/2014 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 2,028.51 0.00 2,028.51 AP 00351006 09/03/2014 OPENDNS INC 2,227.50 0.00 2,227.50 AP 00351007 09/03/2014 PAL CAMPAIGN 10.00 0.00 10.00 AP 00351008 09/03/2014 PARK,TAYLOR 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00351009 09/03/2014 PENNINGTON.JOHN 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00351010 09/03/2014 PEP BOYS 17.23 - 0.00 17.23 AP 00351011 09/03/2014 PIONEER MANUFACTURING 3,946.32 0.00 3,946.32 AP 00351012 09/03/2014 POLLOCK,LARRY 359.00 0.00 359.00 AP 00351013 09/03/2014 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 102.45 0.00 102.45 AP 00351014 09/03/2014 PRINTERS,THE 4,195.20 0.00 4,195.20 AP 00351015 09/03/2014 PRO SALES GROUP INC 630.23 0.00 630.23 AP 00351016 09/03/2014 PRO-PLANET INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 298.20 0.00 298.20 AP 00351017 09/03/2014 PULTE HOMES CORP 680.71 0.00 680.71 AP 00351018 09/03/2014 RACKED AND READY STEEL 216.00 0.00 216.00 AP 00351019 09/03/2014 RAMIREZ,JOSE J 2,300.00 0.00 2,300.00 AP 00351020 09/03/2014 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 12,666.64 0.00 12,666.64 AP 00351021 09/03/2014 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL INC 452.79 0.00 452.79 AP 00351022 09/03/2014 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 115.88 0.00 115.88 AP 00351023 09/03/2014 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTOR 63.67 0.00 63.67 AP 00351024 09/03/2014 REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA 361.57 0.00 361.57 AP 00351025 09/03/2014 RICHLEIGH ASSOCIATES INC 8,538.00 0.00 8,538.00 AP 00351026 09/03/2014 RILES,DAVID 64.00 0.00 64.00 AP 00351027 09/03/2014 RIZZI,TREFONI MICHAEL 854.00 0.00 854.00 AP 00351028 09/03/2014 SAN BERNARDINO CTY 16,037.46 0.00 16,037.46 AP 00351029 09/03/2014 SAN BERNARDINO CTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 2,730.00 4,103.00 6,833.00*** AP 00351030 09/03/2014 SBPEA 779.50 0.00 779.50 AP 00351031 09/03/2014 SEXTON,SHEILA 6.00 0.00 6.00 AP 00351032 09/03/2014 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 93.38 0.00 93.38 AP 00351033 09/03/2014 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 150.00 0.00 150.00 AP 00351034 09/03/2014 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 30.51 0.00 30.51 AP 00351035 09/03/2014 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 180.00 0.00 180.00 AP 00351036 09/03/2014 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 325.05 0.00 325.05 AP 00351037 09/03/2014 SMITH,JAYMI LEE 854.00 0.00 854.00 AP 00351038 09/03/2014 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 3,232.42 382.07 3,614.49*** AP 00351039 09/03/2014 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 2,237.66 0.00 2,237.66 AP 00351040 09/03/2014 SOUTH COAST AQMD 1,566.76 0.00 1,566.76 AP 00351041 09/03/2014 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,237.14 0.00 1,237.14 AP 00351042 09/03/2014 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,643.93 0.00 2,643.93 AP 00351043 09/03/2014 SOUTHLAND FARMERS MARKET ASSOC INC 620.00 0.00 620.00 AP 00351044 09/03/2014 SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 414.00 0.00 414.00 AP 00351045 09/03/2014 SOUTHWEST BOULDER AND STONE 3,473.33 0.00 3,473.33 AP 00351046 09/03/2014 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 15,544.07 0.00 15,544.07 AP 00351047 09/03/2014 STOTZ EQUIPMENT 3,266.87 0.00 3,266.87 AP 00351048 09/03/2014 TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 0.00 225.00 225.00 AP 00351049 09/03/2014 THEATRE COMPANY,THE 272.63 0.00 272.63 AP 00351050 09/03/2014 THOMPSON PLUMBING SUPPLY 1,582.06 0.00 1,582.06 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 7 Current Date: 09/10/2014 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:36:59 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P8 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 8/27/2014 through 9/9/2014 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00351051 09/03/2014 TONG,WENDY Y 1,150.00 0.00 1,150.00 AP 00351052 09/03/2014 TRAINING CONNECTION 650.00 0.00 650.00 AP 00351053 09/03/2014 UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC 37,533.00 0.00 37,533.00 AP 00351054 09/03/2014 UNITED ROTARY BRUSH CORPORATION 854.99 0.00 854.99 AP 00351055 09/03/2014 VILLAGE NURSERIES WHOLESALE LP 336.41 0.00 336.41 AP 00351056 09/03/2014 VORTEX INDUSTRIES INC 964.64 0.00 964.64 AP 00351057 09/03/2014 WAINWRIGHT,JANICE RODGERS 1,530.00 0.00 1,530.00 AP 00351058 09/03/2014 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 429.20 0.00 429.20 AP 00351059 09/03/2014 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,731.76 0.00 1,731.76 AP 00351060 09/03/2014 WESTLAND GROUP INC 4,727.29 0.00 4,727.29 AP 00351061 09/03/2014 WHITE HOUSE PHOTO INC 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00351062 09/04/2014 AIRGAS USA LLC 0.00 68.86 68.86 AP 00351067 09/04/2014 BRODART BOOKS 6,258.42 0.00 6,258.42 AP 00351068 09/04/2014 CALSENSE 2,049.42 0.00 2,049.42 AP 00351069 09/04/2014 COMP U ZONE 3,249.12 0.00 3,249.12 AP 00351071 09/04/2014 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 94,993.25 0.00 94,993.25 AP 00351072 09/04/2014 EMCOR SERVICE 23,353.76 0.00 23,353.76 AP 00351073 09/04/2014 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 550.26 0.00 550.26 AP 00351074 09/04/2014 GENERATOR SERVICES CO 1,207.22 0.00 1,207.22 AP 00351075 09/04/2014 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 270.48 0.00 270.48 AP 00351076 09/04/2014 HYDRO SCAPE PRODUCTS INC 1,418.47 0.00 1,418.47 AP 00351077 09/04/2014 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 940.00 0.00 940.00 AP 00351078 09/04/2014 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 2,809.26 0.00 2,809.26 AP 00351079 09/04/2014 NEC CORPORATION OF AMERICA 25,934.41 0.00 25,934.41 AP 00351080 09/04/2014 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 902.88 0.00 902.88 AP 00351081 09/04/2014 TARGET 247.93 0.00 247.93 AP 00351082 09/04/2014 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 0.00 29.04 29.04 EP 00004595 08/27/2014 MICHAEL,L.DENNIS 90.00 0.00 90.00 EP 00004597 09/03/2014 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMONGA 113,410.34 0.00 113,410.34 EP 00004598 09/03/2014 FORTISTAR METHANE GROUP LLC 14,702.90 0.00 14,702.90 EP 00004599 09/03/2014 RCPFA 9,971.27 0.00 9,971.27 EP 00004600 09/03/2014 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 2,510,019.00 0.00 2,510,019.00 EP 00004601 09/03/2014 RCCEA 1,116.00 0.00 1,116.00 Total City: $4,270,407.05 Total Fire: $70,648.47 Grand Total: $4,341,055.52 Note: *** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 8 Current Date: 09/10/2014 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:36:59 P9 ca o n o ^4i m ' O M W a ° m co fi co O o C �j N l7 N 0. N N o CL ¢ n o W o .- '- - - o « LL E to o E > co n N z O a i S G m• N o a s 0 X E a a C > N O N . O 1D N 10 N U N r N N -. y N y C I O' O .- .- o O W r r L O U C co o o" o O U a E y 0 L oy. .- m N w a m - m E H 0 0 N DI O 0 ' p U y c q .- > N 0 c tv 0 o m o x a x N N )''n m to ^ C O • n o m e a o a U y E N N N• N N 0 e .. O= 0 OOi O o O O N C e t b n n'i O Z`E O o r j x 6 n o LL a O j L0i 0 0 N a ^ N m N ni -o C O A n O] O ai O ^ f N N O d o y m1 O n O r N N O O 0 OL V O I: O co co- N o CO n 'o y aL Y 0) Q O y N W N N aa co O NC O N O o f co co C N E - C O O O) c o v v ° E _a- 'a) C 7 N p o oo ,- m V C 7 o n _ ° w co M F c CC H al dW n O O to o of m 0 .O 7 I t to o 0 0 o 0 Ini m 0 0 Y U n 4 6 e O vi 6 n d + 7 mj o a m m CO cc; o .n no a u 3 0 �' Q 2 N m ac of .r n y y co ) v O a. ONi Cu o O co N N N LL Ct J O O p N 0) N p y Co mi b C d 0 U a cc 5 >o y n C C ° CO o.� • „ y O t- 0 L N O) a y co O O O N n N e° E c N O N O O O O co 0 OI V O IO y UI'V d q n O O O O •r ` C lh N O L. > 0 0 0 O O N O N a o) c E a O O O N O O y W Q N N CO CO N 0 0 0 N N W a) N 9 O)'- O O) N N 0' L CO N O 2 Si a e e m °o, O.c u a)U M N N co N a j en J To 0 C d C y y > O ¢ C H A N N C E. M T d C Co N C U 9 � co 0 a a g p c m o f d c 00E `m 0 LL a s o 10 o E o m y 0 O U > > y O � C y E 0 o _ 2 a ; y a, a, m CO a m O e (7 U 131 v m C N Q' N • C H a Pt m O N VO d, > g m G 's N C Of T y r n CO W fo co J E N ¢ n d E O co N >W C m , i r v• Q m y L NC a 0E0 :6, N E U �o ' O _ c ° N _ O CO oo o ° a N t p o. u m o o o O > • U m 0 0 W H 2 U 0 a6 ¢ CO I- r 0 ¢ W _¢ > - c P 1 0 r0' b n b m CO b CO CO CO n n co b 0 0) 0 CO b b m co b O to y 'C m o 0 0 0 0 o o o 0 0 o 0 0 o o 0 o o 0 0 0 '0- K Q �? C? O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N _ n n o O q m to r r O O r 1� m O O to 01 b n 0 0 to n r r u O. O r r CO m N 0 r CO CO N N N CO CO N N 0 0 0 b b 0 0 r V b CO CO 0 r 0 N CO r V b 0 b r n 0 0 00000000 ,- 00000000 0 0 r O LLI i. 'C •. r co m m b n n 0 0 N b n V N m n N N 0 b b O N O p 0 CO 0 n n V V m CO m CO N V CO m V 0 V m 0 CO O O m O O 0 0 R 0 2 _ O r CO N N. N C CU ° 0 - N N C 01 CO O r r r r r m N Q n 0 O 2 eit 2 O 0 O N N 0 0 0 b O n 0 0 0 OI n 0 , 0 0 0) n O O r 0 V' Y 0 b N N 0 CO 0 0410 O b O n O N 0 N n O m O O n 0 ✓ g CO O O O O O ) 0 V m O 0 N N 0 0 CO U, 0) b O O O r N O r b N N N N o N N N N N N CU N N N N U o N N co o a a a a a a a a a a a a < < a a < .2 a 0 0 F a s o 0 o N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o r m fD W CD O V) O N O b N N O O b O n 0 0 0 0 0 N r q b're N O O r m OO O O n O m O m n Om O r b O N N r CO • 0 b V '- ONO O N O r 0 0 0 W O n 0 0 Ol 0 0 0 00 CO b N OI N. O N O O V O m O O b m O Q O O N CO. 0 0 O N N N O O b O b b O O V n O m O O b Of O O O m W m p P Q Q O O N O b 0 0 r n O b O O b N 0 0 O m O 0 CO CD 0 b 0 0 N- 0 O CO 0 0 r CD 0 N 0 0 n n 0 0 0 n n y 0 0 0 0) vi o C O) o n O o o m n O m O o R 6 6 8 b b 0 O rn n 0 O O O O O O O o O O O m o N 0 b 0 0 b co- n m O) Q O) V CO O O Q 0 CO 0 b O m CO O m O O Q O O ) 6 b O O N O N m co b r ,_ Q o Nb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 O ` N N N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Of O q n n n N n N V O O O N O O '- Oi O O N O 6 Vi N V V r ni C • m m m b C0 O) 0 m m N m r O) CO CO o) n CO n b n n O) m N O O n n b V CO O N CO n CO O V O O r O O CO CO CO V m CO TO co- O N OI O O O m r O n O V O n W b O co- 0 b W O 0 Q N or Y O b ) q n m O) m o b n 0 o N w T o o 0 n 0 0 N Q m Q m V m o O O CD Q CO 7 0 CO m m r m n CO CO M N m V r m r r r N N N N N N N N N Q r a 4J W d H C E • GI > r -t U, n 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OO 00 00 0 °O °O 00 0 00 0 0 0 too 0 C N j CU n 00 00 000000000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 0 jr 10 — o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 o O V C ) `C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o c b a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o n 0 0p y co o 0) 0) N O N 0 0 0 b 0 0 O b 0 0 0 0 0 O N O b 0 0 CO CO CO OC O O N V Q N m N r N N N N m m N N N N N V) a N N L M th a` 0 d O G O Q LL — 0 0 m m m Q a m m m m V V m m Q Q Q m Cr) m m m V O O W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O t❑ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N () a b r r A o o r n o b m co n O O b n O �- r m m N O N m m N N N m m O N 0 r N Cl. LL ( 0 0 co r V CO N y CO N N CO r V 0 CD 0 0 IL ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 CO O o N o C ❑ 0; )C O O O 2 O r O d o j q N LL a a a a 0 co r- <CO LL co 0 CC CC Ct CC CC 0:0 0 0 0 0) to O 01 F b Y Y Y Y Y Z Z Z Z Z Z Y Y Y Y Y Y U U U U V •- Y H U b W r Z Z Z Z O b Z J W m m m m CO a Q Q Q a Q F F F F F N .0 N Q a m I- F F F F F m m m m m O 2 E E E E 0 ,0 m m U m ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ O Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z a C a Z 0 < W W W W W < < < < < < < < < < Q C > 0: K K m K O O O O O O O O O O O F F F 0 Z U 0 0 0 0 0 J J J J J J J J J 2 2 2 J O } 2 2 2 2 2 W W W W W W W W W W W J J J W Z U o m O: O: 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 F F F 0 2 0 Q Z C z m 0_ 0_ 0_ 0_ 0 0_ 0_ 0_ 0_ 0 0 < G c 0) 0 0) U rn = W E LL lai U. lai lai Z Z Z E. S 0 Q Q < g g g 4a 4a g g g g g g g g g g 4a g g 4a a g a Z K o 411 Ill W 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C ❑ C S W c O CO W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W m W C 0 > m J -4 LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL U. LL LL LL LL LL 3 LL p m K 9 O O VO O Z a a a x 0 to C co O m c c 0. c o > > o E u. o o. o U '- m m N. O b N 10 n m 0 m m Q fO b 0 m m O Q to r O m m m N CO N m m Q N V N b N m m m O C C o0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O o 0 0 0 U 0 o o 0 0 N > C T v O T C 0 0 O OI Q Q PI d 3 O O m N m }O 0 Y m O N n N� N x b N N- m O) m• 4 0 LL K m O Z K > Q > > Y Q Y X 2 C' S O o CL R 00 N W W W W W O 0 m m o < 0 00 0 00' 00' 0 a 0 W m u oQ ¢ v 0 a n ttoo co CU CO to CO m m CO CO CO CU CU Cm 0i CU CO m ` m D tCI m 0 7 O Y d c U J m U- m m m co m m m m m m m m co co m m co co m F t%) 2 O ce P11 w P m 0 Uf a O 7D N N Z a t? CO N. C v O1 1 C 2 N o 0 r O 0. r••S p O 0 01 0 01 ^' t z C Y l7 P 0 O al r d a 2 N W co 0 O 't1 Co Ce n n CI ✓ o 03 N < < T 0 0 0 2 t0 O 12 2 W CO n 0 B1' r O N o t r 01 {7 9 IN- N 01 A To O N O 1 N O_ n N O > m 0 00) Co m 0 0 m 0 r - It co j O O O 0 To A 01 w CD > 0 0- N N[ b O a; O O O 00 ss ta V Y f r ry w a+ •C E •N 0 d 0 Tr C O d a • CI 0 00 00 n o C ° N O O O re WI co N 0 0 0 0 ✓ C • r 0.ca O O O c w 16 U) M o o o N OE1 N to 0. .0 46. 7 ai ° o Q LL — n N ° q▪ A O N 0 a LO N N u a 0 0. N N IM CL 0. 0 CD CO • 0 CO O 01 N C C n 01 N 1 Q 0 0 Co N W at N a m E O U U K O 1- K U u `a O w u m m @ O w O _1 u i 2 Q Q 9 W• Z C m I W C O U' — O F a i! N U) C co E CO' N r O O o b CO 0 2 N d O N C W W O Q 0 a n `• O $ 0 0 U U fO M CC P12 Dl w a O N a' Q n on LL A a o E a 0Z O LLI a, Ty .- 40 0 a o2 a a S o 0 o 0- N 0 N T 0. a 0 0 f a A q N 90: o N N o n N q, Lo OI N N p > uO °n X m O . O N G3 N N M N 0 A n M 0 0 J N m N ai > o N o 0 Y0 m m r N 01 N t M cc b tri V •la 4a N C L ▪ d N 0 E U v C d n F O O] O A ^ C a:. (9 N N > 0 0 Ca C A ID 1+) w y M a N 0 n O 2 p N 5 L.d O O 07 a ' 0 O O = m 0 O v 1.1. aq , a d = 0 N °v m S 0 n• ' ai a. • y CI 0 0 °n AC 0 n j A N tef Q m I j N s N Z m 0: 0 LL a 0 V LL N • N Y • Y c C :1 Z A A N m m N Z N ° O cn c E A a > > c Q A L co A a V c C A E r i 0 N °o a o 0 C Y P C N P L O a 8 a. Co °o d N Co m 0 U O. >- s' P W a1,1 m EC Q rn LL a o_ co aa cc E a o N 00 m 0 co m n A 17 a N O r-ai N N q O n O n n N o O n O t0 0 e') a) a 0 0 N m_ o O q N — N V )o N m O 0 O 0 0 0 0 CO j0 O q O 0 O O 0 0 O o O O o O O i.m o o o o 0 o 0 v v E a` o o co- m of ut 0 0 m o) a) •§ n n m 0. IX ` Al 0 M YJ 0 0 CO 0 0 0 CO u._ o o N n o o n p N O o O o 0 0 N ta n n �n a• i❑ m m o ` In o as a" H N 7 • C y a m o gm ">i o R m 0 o 2 3., o A d .0 > r $❑ R N CO■ ia In 0 /a C N P L /t Q O pF 0 . U o y q N N Q) !Are O O r N cn 7 Oi 7 Q ❑ z D LL z w z z 2 re N 0 Nn IL 72. ? 0 2 CD LL t0 0 m U F- E w o E z o z T. 0 0 0 E 0 5 E m a n n n X ' u N Q 0 y z N w N N U)) co a L U r Z ❑ IL) c t J LL O C 2 O 2 tt C a o d c 48 3 c LL 3 O O O. O U O > o N m aa> o u o 0 yo 0 E o Q o co to , C N • y b 0.1 b ■v C N =.1 L C G 0 « E O U m y m z C a) 2 Q ti N Q ° O N C C• N N ° N N o 0 co m U J 0 d L f F ❑ N N 2 U P14 ACo STAFF REPORT tit t s I ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT 147 Date: September 17, 2014 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Fire Board John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori E. Sassoon, Treasurer V/ By: Sandra G. Ramirez, Management Analyst III/uy Subject: ADOPTION OF ANNUAL STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY RECOMMENDATION: The Fire Board Members review the Statement of Investment Policy on an annual basis. It is recommended that the Fire Board Members approve and adopt the attached Statement of Investment Policy for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. BACKGROUND: California Government Code Section 53646 requires that the Treasurer or Chief Fiscal Officer shall annually render to the Fire Board Members a Statement of Investment Policy, which shall be considered at a public meeting. Further, the Fire Board Members shall also consider any modifications to the investment policy at a public meeting. The proposed investment policy includes three primary modifications for your approval. Additionally, there have been a number of minor enhancements that include updating of terminology and formatting of the document. The three primary modifications to the current Statement of Investment Policy include the addition of the following sections based on standards recently established by the California Municipal Treasurers Association (CMTA): • Delegation of Authority • Internal Controls • Performance The Delegation of Authority section clearly documents and reiterates who is authorized by the Fire Board Members to manage the District's investment portfolio based on the City's Municipal Code. The Internal Controls section clearly identifies that an annual process is conducted by an independent external auditor to ensure compliance with the District's policies and procedures as they pertain to treasury management. The Performance section adds a new process that will be initiated whereby staff will compare the District's annual investment performance with the appropriate benchmark or benchmarks and, if necessary, consider making adjustments to future investment strategies as market conditions permit. The addition of these three sections will result in a more comprehensive investment policy for the District. P15 ADOPTION OF ANNUAL STA I'EMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY PAGE 2 SEPTEMBER 17,2014 The Fire Board Members originally adopted a Statement of Investment Policy in July 1990. The District's Investment Policy and practices are based upon federal, state, and local law, as well as prudent money management. The primary goals of the District's policy are: 1) to ensure compliance with all federal, state, and local law governing the investment of monies under the control of the Treasurer; 2) to protect the District's assets; and 3) to invest public funds prudently. The Treasurer is authorized to invest the Fire District's funds in accordance with the California Government Code Section 53600 and the investment policy adopted by the Fire Board Members. These funds are accounted for in the City's financial system and are reported annually in the City's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). The Fire Board Members also receive a monthly investment report as part of the agenda packet for certain scheduled Fire Board meetings. The District continues to maintain an investment strategy more conservative than required under state law. Additionally, the Treasurer and Finance staff regularly monitor legislation, government code amendments, and professional practices pertaining to investing of public funds, to ensure the District's Annual Statement of Investment Policy is updated as appropriate. Respectfully submitted, UAL) Lori E. Sassoon Treasurer Attachments q.: (14,1611 .ri! . • *• • - * RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY 2014 Prepared by the Administrative Services Department Lori E. Sassoon, Treasurer Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Sandra G. Ramirez, Management Analyst Ill P17 STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT INTRODUCTION This Statement of Investment Policy ("Policy") provides the guidelines for the prudent investment of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District's idle cash, and outlines the policies essential to ensuring the safety and financial strength of the District's investment portfolio. The investment policy is based on the principles of prudent money management and conforms to all federal, state, and local laws governing the investment of public funds. The goal of the District's investment policy is to enhance the economic status of the District by protecting its pooled cash and to invest public funds to: 1. Meet the daily cash flow needs of the District; 2. Comply with all laws of the State of California regarding investment of public funds; and 3. Achieve a reasonable rate of return while minimizing the potential for capital losses arising from market changes or issuer default. SCOPE The investment policy applies to the investment activities of all funds of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. These funds are accounted for in the City's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) and include the following fund types: General Fund, Special Revenue Funds, Debt Service Funds, Capital Project Funds, Proprietary Funds, as well as Trust and Agency Funds. Bond proceeds shall be invested in accordance with the requirements and restrictions outlined in bond documents as approved by the President and Members of the Fire Board. Guidelines presented herein are not intended to apply to bond proceeds held by the District or by fiscal agents or trustees for bond holders of Fire debt. PRUDENCE The District Treasurer, the delegated investment officers, and/or his appointed designee operates the District's pooled cash investment program under the "prudent investor" standard, and shall be applied in managing the overall portfolio. The District Treasurer, the delegated investment officers, and/or his appointed designee acting in accordance with the investment policy and the "prudent investor" standard and exercising due diligence shall be relieved of personal responsibility for an individual security's credit risk or market price changes, provided deviations from expectations are reported in a timely manner and appropriate action is taken to control adverse developments whenever possible. Rev: 9/2014 1 P18 Investments shall be made with judgment and care, under circumstances then prevailing, which persons of prudence, discretion, and intelligence exercise in the professional management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived. OBJECTIVE The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District operates its temporary pooled idle cash investments under the "prudent investor" standard. This affords the District a broad spectrum of investment opportunities as long as the investment is deemed prudent and is allowable under current legislation of the State of California (Government Code Section 53600, et. seq.) and other legal restrictions as the District may impose from time to time. The objective of the investment portfolio is to meet the short and long term cash flow demands of the District. To achieve this objective, the portfolio will be structured to provide Safety of Principal and Liquidity, while then providing a reasonable return on investments. The District may direct its fiscal agents to invest funds associated with bonds or debt issues pending disbursement or reinvestment in "money market mutual funds" that are shares of beneficial interest issued by diversified management companies. The criteria for"money market mutual funds"are more specifically described in California Government Code § 53601(1). INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES Security purchases and holdings will be maintained within statutory limits imposed by Government Code. District policy has been to limit investments more stringently than required under state law. Criteria for selecting investments and the order of priority are: 1. Safety - The safety and risk associated with an investment refers to the potential loss of principal, interest, or combination thereof. The District only operates in those investments that are considered safe. Investments shall be undertaken in a manner that seeks to ensure that capital losses resulting from institution default, broker/dealer default, or the erosion of market value are avoided. The District shall seek to preserve principal by mitigating the two types of risk: credit risk and market risk. • Credit risk, defined as the risk of loss due to failure of the issuer of a security, shall be mitigated by investing in only high quality securities and by diversifying the investment portfolio so that the failure of any one issuer would not unduly harm District cash flow. • Market risk, defined as the risk of market value fluctuations due to overall changes in the general level of interest rates, shall be mitigated by structuring the portfolio. It is explicitly recognized, however, that in a diversified portfolio, occasional measured losses may occur, and must be considered within the context of overall investment return. Rev: 9/2014 2 P19 2. Liquidity - This refers to the ability to sell these securities and terminate the agreement in order to receive cash at any moment in time with minimal chance of losing some portion of principal or interest. Liquidity is an important investment quality especially when the need for unexpected funds occasionally occurs. The District's investment portfolio will remain sufficiently liquid to enable the District to meet operating requirements that might be reasonably anticipated. Invested bond proceeds will be structured so as to meet anticipated drawdown requirements. 3. Yield - The District's investment portfolio shall be designed with the objective of attaining a reasonable market rate of return throughout economic cycles, as long as it does not diminish the objectives of Safety and Liquidity. DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY The President and Members of the Fire Board, as permitted under California Government Code §53607, delegates the responsibility to manage the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District's investment portfolio to the District Treasurer. The District Treasurer shall be responsible for all transactions undertaken and shall establish a system of controls to regulate the activities of subordinate officials, and their procedures, in the absence of the District Treasurer. Pursuant to Government Code §1190, the District Treasurer has the authority to appoint a Deputy Treasurer or designee to act on behalf of the District. The District Treasurer will provide written authorization in delegating any of his/her authority. ETHICS AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The Treasurer/Deputy Treasurer and employees involved in the investment process shall refrain from personal business activity that could conflict with proper execution of the investment program, or which could impair their ability to make impartial investment decisions. Employees and investment officers shall disclose any material financial interest in fmancial institutions that conduct business within this jurisdiction, and they shall further disclose any large personal financial/investment positions that could be related to the performance of the District's portfolio, particularly with regard to the time of purchases and sales. The Treasurer/Deputy Treasurer or investment employees are required to file annual disclosure statements as required by the Fair Political Practices Commission(FPPC). AUTHORIZED BROKER-DEALERS The District will transact business only with approved investment securities broker/dealers that are approved as an authorized broker/dealer in compliance with the District selection process. The Treasurer shall request all broker/dealers that wish to do business with the District to provide proof of capitalization to meet the District's needs, and agree to abide by the conditions set forth in this investment policy. All broker/dealers who want to become qualified bidders for investment transactions must have offices in the State of California and provide a current audited financial statement and complete the appropriate District Broker/Dealer Questionnaire and Certification. Rev: 9/2014 3 P20 The Treasurer will maintain a list of approved security broker/dealers selected by credit worthiness who are authorized to provide investment services to the District. The District shall at least annually send a copy of the current investment policy to authorized broker/dealers approved to do business with the District. Confirmation of receipt of this policy shall be considered evidence that the broker/dealer has read and understands the District's investment policy and will recommend and execute only transactions suitable for and in compliance with the District's investment policy. AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS The District is governed by California Government Code Section 53600, et. seq. to invest in specific types of securities. The District has further limited the types of securities in which it may invest. Any security not listed in the following table is not a valid investment for the District. The concise list of approved securities is as follows: MAXIMUM INVESTMENTS/DEPOSITS PERCENTAGES MATURITY* (See Government Code Section 53601) Securities of the U.S. Government, or its agencies Unlimited 5 years The Treasurer may invest in bonds, debentures, notes, discount notes, and certain callable and step-up notes** issued by the following United States Government Agencies:Federal Home Loan Banks(FHLB), Federal National Mortgage Association(FNMA), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation(FHLMC), Federal Farm Credit Bank System(FFCB). Municipals (Warrants,Notes & Bonds) 30% 5 years Taxable or tax-exempt bonds, notes, warrants, or other evidences of indebtedness of the State or any local agency within the State of California with a minimum long-term rating of either "Al"by Moody's Investors Service, or "A+"by Standard&Poor's, the minimum short-term rating of either "MIG 1"by Moody's Investors Service, or "SP-1"by Standard&Poor's, (the minimum rating shall apply to any agency, irrespective of any credit enhancement), including bonds, notes, warrants, or other evidences of indebtedness payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue producing property owned, controlled, or operated by either the State or local agency, a department, board, agency, or authority of the State or local agency, or of any local agency within this state. Certificates of Deposit(or Time Deposits) Unlimited 5 years Placed with commercial banks and/or savings and loan companies. Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 30% 5 years FDIC—Insured Certificates of Deposit 30% 5 years Banker's Acceptances 40% 180 days Commercial Paper 25% 270 days Investments in Commercial Paper must be only with corporations having assets in excess of$500,000,000. Must be of`prime"quality of the highest rating or of the highest letter and numerical rating as provided for by Moody's Investor's Service Inc. or Standard & Poor's Corporation. Short term rating of at least 'A' or Al/P1'and a long-term rating of'A'is required. Purchases of commercial paper are limited to no more than 10%of the outstanding commercial paper of any single issuer. Local Agency Investment Fund (State Pool) Demand Deposits S0 MM*** Daily Liquidity Rev: 9/2014 4 P21 AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS—(Continued) MAXIMUM INVESTMENTS/DEPOSITS PERCENTAGES MATURITY* Joint Powers Authority(JPA) Investment Pool (Short-Term) 10% Daily Liquidity Deposit of Funds(See Government Code - n/a Section 53630 -Ref. C) Repurchase Agreements (Repos) 20% 1 year The market value of the securities that underlay the repurchase agreement must be valued at 102%or greater of the funds borrowed against the securities and the value must be adjusted no less than quarterly. An executed Master Repurchase Agreement must be on file. Medium Term Corporate Notes 30% 5 years Investments in Medium Term Corporate Notes must be issued by corporations organized and operating within the United States. Securities eligible for investment must be rated "AA" or better by Moody's or Standard& Poor's rating services. Investment Agreements**** 5% 397 days Investment agreements, guaranteed investment contracts,funding agreements, or any other form of corporate note which represents the unconditional obligation of one or more banks, insurance companies or other financial institutions, or are guaranteed by a financial institution, which has an unsecured rating, or which agreement is itself rated, as of the date of execution thereof in one of the two highest rating categories by two or more rating agencies; or, which are collateralized at least 100%with U.S. Government securities. * Maximum term unless expressly authorized by Governing Body and within the prescribed time frame for said approval. **Step-up notes -A step-up note is a financial instrument whose value "depends on"or is "derived from"the value of an underlying asset, reference rate, or index often known generically as a type of derivative. Investments in this type of instruments are limited to debt securities that have periodic increases, or step-up interest rate adjustments that provide upward mobility in yield return. Investments in debt securities, which contain a callable feature are also allowable. ***Limit set by Local Agency Investment Fund(LAIF) Governing Board, not Government Code. ****Percentage limits for Investment Agreements are not intended to apply to bond funds held by the City or by Fiscal Agents or Trustees, in which investment of such funds is under the City's control or direction. INVESTMENT POOLS The Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) is a voluntary investment alternative for California's local governments and special districts authorized by the California Government Code. LAIF is managed by the State Treasurer's Office with oversight by the Local Agency Investment Advisory Board. Rev: 9/2014 5 P22 The District's participation in LAIF was approved by the President and Members of the Fire Board with other authorized investments on July 1990. It is a permitted investment with the knowledge that the fund may invest in some vehicles allowed by statute but not otherwise authorized under the District's authorized investments. All securities in LAIF are purchased under the authority of Government Code Sections 16430 and 16480. All investments are purchased at market, and market valuation is conducted monthly. The District may also invest in shares of beneficial interest issued by a joint powers authority ("JPA") organized pursuant to Section 6509.7 of the California Government Code that invests in the securities and obligations specified in the code and which shall have retained an investment advisor that meets the following criteria: 1. Be registered or exempt from registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission; 2. Have not less than five (5) years of experience investing in the securities and obligations authorized herein, and 3. Have assets under management in excess of five hundred million dollars. SAFEKEEPING OF SECURITIES To protect against potential losses by the collapse of individual securities dealers, all trades will be transacted on a Delivery Versus Payment(DVP) basis. This means that the securities shall be delivered to the District's designated custodian upon receipt of the payment by the District. The securities shall be held in safekeeping by a third party custodian, acting as agent for the District under the terms of a custody agreement executed by the bank and District. The only exception to the foregoing shall be depository accounts and security purchases made with investment pools and certificates of deposit since the purchased securities are not deliverable. Evidence of these investments will be held in the City's vault No outside broker/dealer or advisor may have access to District funds, accounts or investments, and any transfer of funds to or through an outside broker/dealer must be approved by the District Treasurer/Deputy Treasurer. The District strives to maintain the level of investment of all funds as near 100% as possible, through daily and projected cash flow determinations. Idle cash management and investment transactions are the responsibility of the District Treasurer. DIVERSIFICATION AND MAXIMUM MATURITIES It is the policy of the District to diversify its investment portfolio. Assets shall be diversified to eliminate the risk of loss resulting from over-concentration of assets in a specific issuer, security type, and maturities. Diversification strategies shall be determined and revised periodically. Rev: 9/2014 6 P23 The purpose of diversifying is to reduce overall portfolio risks while attaining an average market rate of return; therefore, it needs to be conceptualized in terms of maturity, instrument types and issuer. To the extent possible, the District will attempt to match its investments with anticipated cash flow requirements. The maximum maturity of individual investments shall not exceed a maturity of five years from the date of purchase unless the President and Members of the Fire Board has granted authority to make that investment either specifically or as a part of an investment program approved by the Board. INTERNAL CONTROL The District Treasurer and/or his appointed designee shall establish an annual process of independent review by an external auditor. This review will provide internal control by assuring compliance with policies and procedures. PERFORMANCE The investment performance of the District's operating portfolio shall be evaluated and compared to an appropriate benchmark in order to assess the success of the investment program relative to the District's Safety, Liquidity, and Yield objectives. This review will be conducted annually with the District's Treasurer, and Finance Director and, if necessary, consider making adjustments to future investment strategies as market conditions permit. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO REVIEW AND POLICY ADOPTION Outside, independent auditors are required to perform an annual review of the District's Investment Policy, process, and internal controls. The review process is performed as part of the District's annual external audit. The investment policy shall be reviewed annually by the President and Members of the Fire Board and any modifications made thereto must be approved by the Board. REPORTING The Treasurer shall prepare and submit a monthly investment report to the President and Members of the Fire Board and City Manager, which shall include all securities, excluding those held by and invested through trustees. The report shall include the following: • The type of investment, name of the issuer, date of purchase, date of maturity, par and dollar amount invested in all securities. • The weighted average maturity of the investments. Rev: 9/2014 7 P24 • Any funds, investments, or programs including loans that are under the management of contracted parties. • A description of the compliance with the Statement of Investment Policy. • A statement of the District's ability to meet its pooled expenditure requirements for the next six months or provide an explanation as to why sufficient money shall, or may not be available. • The investment portfolio report shall include current market value information for all investments. A monthly market value will be obtained for each security owned by the District. For purposes of reporting, the market value of each security may be obtained from the District's custodian bank or other pricing source(s) utilized by the District's approved brokers. The Treasurer shall be responsible for reviewing and modifying investment guidelines as conditions warrant and is required to submit same for re-approval to the President and Members of the Fire Board on an annual basis with or without changes. However, the Treasurer may, at any time, further restrict the items approved for purchase as deemed appropriate. The basic premise underlying the District's investment philosophy is, and will continue to be, to ensure that money is always safe and available when needed. WI/ZO 114- Lori . Sassoon Date Treasurer Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Rev:9/2014 8 P25 City of Rancho Cucamonga Statement of Investment Policy . GLOSSARY OF TERMS ACCRUED INTEREST: Interest that has accumulated but has not yet been paid from the most recent interest payment date or issue date to a certain date. AGENCIES: Securities issued by a U.S. government-sponsored entity (GSE) and federally related institutions. Examples of a GSE include: Federal Farm Credit Bank System (FFCB), Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Company (FHLMC-Freddie Mac), Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA-Fannie Mae), and Student Loan Marketing Association (SLMA-Sallie Mae). AMORTIZED COST: The original cost of the principal adjusted for the periodic reduction of any discount or premium from the purchase date until a specific date (also called "Book Value"). ASKED: The price at which securities are offered. BANKERS' ACCEPTANCE (BA): A draft, bill, or exchange accepted by a bank or trust company. The accepting institution guarantees payment of the bill, as well as the issuer. BASIS POINT: One basis point is one hundredth of one percent (.01). As an example, the difference between a security yielding 3.25%and one yielding 3.20% is five basis points. BEAR MARKET: A period of generally pessimistic attitudes and declining market prices. BENCHMARK: A comparative base for measuring the performance or risk tolerance of the investment portfolio. A benchmark should represent a close correlation to the level of risk and the average duration of the portfolio's investments. BID: The price offered by a buyer of securities. (When you are selling securities, you ask for a bid.) BOND: A financial obligation for which the issuer promises to pay the bondholder a specified stream of future cash flows, including periodic interest payments and a principal repayment. BOND EQUIVALENT YIELD: The basis on which yields on notes and bonds are quoted. BOOK VALUE (COST VALUE): The value at which a debt security is shown on the holder's balance sheet. Book value is acquisition cost less amortization of premium or accretion of discount. BROKER: An individual or firm acting as principal in a securities transaction. BULL MARKET: A period of generally optimistic attitudes and increasing market prices. CALLABLE SECURITY: A security that is redeemable by the issuer before the scheduled maturity. Bonds are usually called when the interest rates fall so significantly that the issuer can save money by floating new bonds at lower rates. CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT (CD): A time deposit with a specific maturity evidenced by a Certificate. Large denomination CD's are typically negotiable. - 1 - P26 City of Rancho Cucamonga Statement of Investment Policy COLLATERAL: Securities, evidence of deposit or other property which a borrower pledges to secure repayment of a loan. Also refers to securities pledged by a bank to secure deposits of public monies. COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT (CAFR): The official annual financial report for the City. It includes combined statements and basic financial statements for each individual fund and account group prepared in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). CONSTANT MATURITY TREASURY (CMT): An average yield of a specific Treasury maturity sector for a specific time frame. This is a market index for reference of past direction of interest rates for the given Treasury maturity range. COUPON: (a) The annual rate of interest that a bond's issuer promises to pay the bondholder on the bond's face value. (b)A certificate attached to a bond evidencing interest due on a payment date. CUSIP: A unique identifier for a security developed by the Committee of Uniform Security Identification Procedures (CUSIP). The identifier is a nine-digit alphanumeric character. The first six characters identify the issuer,the following two identify the issue, and the final character is a check digit. CUSTODY: A banking service that provides safekeeping for the individual securities in a customer's investment portfolio under a written agreement which also calls for the bank to collect and pay out income, and to buy, sell, receive and deliver securities when ordered to do so by the principal. DEALER: A dealer, as opposed to a broker, acts as a principal in all transactions, buying and selling for his own account. DEBENTURE: A bond secured only by the general credit of the issuer. DELIVERY VERSUS PAYMENT (DVP): Delivery of securities with a simultaneous exchange of money for the securities. DERIVATIVES: (1) Financial instruments whose return profile is linked to, or derived from the movement of one or more underlying index or security, and may include a leveraging factor, or (2) financial contracts based upon notional amounts whose value is derived from an underlying index or security(interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equities or commodities). DISCOUNT: The difference between the cost price of a security and its maturity when quoted at lower than face value. A security selling below original offering price shortly after sale also is considered to be at a discount. DIVERSIFICATION: The practice or concept of investing in a range of securities by sector, maturity, asset class or credit quality in order to reduce and spread financial risk. DURATION: A measure of the sensitivity of the price (the value of principal) of a fixed-income investment to a change in interest rates. Duration is expressed as a number of years. Rising interest rates mean falling bond prices, while declining interest rates mean rising bond prices. FEDERAL CREDIT AGENCIES: Agencies of the Federal government set up to supply credit to various classes of institutions and individuals, e.g., S&L's small business firms, students, farmers, farm cooperatives, and exports. -2 - P27 City of Rancho Cucamonga Statement of Investment Policy FEDERAL FUNDS RATE: The rate of interest at which Fed funds are traded. This rate is currently pegged by the Federal Reserve through open-market operations. FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS (FHLB): Government sponsored wholesale banks (currently 12 regional banks), which lend funds and provide correspondent banking services to member commercial banks, thrift institutions, credit unions and insurance companies. The mission of the FHLB is to liquefy the housing related assets of its members who must purchase stock in their district bank. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION (FNMA): FNMA, like GNMA was chartered under the Federal National Mortgage Association Act in 1938. FNMA is a federal corporation working under the auspices of the Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD). It is the largest single provider of residential mortgage funds in the United States. Fannie Mae, as the corporation is called, is a private stockholder-owned corporation. The corporation's purchase includes a variety of adjustable mortgages and second loans, in addition to fixed-rate mortgages. FNMA's securities are also highly liquid and are widely accepted. FNMA assumes and guarantees that all security holders will receive timely payment of principal and interest. FEDERAL OPEN MARKET COMMITTEE(FOMC): Consists of seven members of the Federal Reserve Board and five of the twelve Federal Reserve Bank Presidents. The President of the New York Federal Reserve Bank is a permanent member, while the other Presidents serve on a rotating basis. The Committee periodically meets to set Federal Reserve guidelines regarding purchases and sales of Government Securities in the open market as a means of influencing the volume of bank credit and money. FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM: The central bank of the United States created by Congress and consisting of a seven member Board of Governors in Washington, D.C., 12 regional banks and 5,700 commercial banks that are members of the system. FISCAL AGENT: A financial institution with trust powers which acts in a fiduciary capacity for the benefit of the bondholders in enforcing the terms of the bond contract. FULL FAITH AND CREDIT: The unconditional guarantee of the United States Government backing a debt for a repayment. GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION (GNMA or Ginnie Mae): Securities influencing the volume of bank credit guaranteed by GNMA and issued by mortgage bankers, commercial banks, savings and loan associations, and other institutions. Security holder is protected by full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. Ginnie Mae securities are backed by the FHA, VA, or FMHM mortgages. The term "pass-through" is often used to describe Ginnie Maes. INTEREST RATE RISK: The risk associated with declines or rises in interest rates which cause an investment in a fixed-income security to increase or decrease in value. Also called "Market Risk." INVESTMENT AGREEMENTS: An agreement with a financial institution to borrow public funds subject to certain negotiated terms and conditions concerning collateral, liquidity and interest rates. LIQUIDITY: A liquid asset is one that can be converted easily and rapidly into cash without a substantial loss of value. - 3 - P28 City of Rancho Cucamonga Statement of Investment Policy LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF): A voluntary program created by State statute as an investment alternative for California's local governments and Special Districts under the administration of the California State Treasurer's Office. All securities are purchased under the authority of the Government Code Section 16430 and 16480.4. MARKET VALUE: The price at which a security is trading and could presumably be purchased or sold. MASTER REPURCHASE AGREEMENT: A written contract covering all future transactions between the parties to repurchase — reverse repurchase agreements that establishes each party's rights in the transactions. A master agreement will often specify, among other things, the right of the buyer-lender to liquidate the underlying securities in the event of default by the seller-borrower. MATURITY: The date upon which the principal or stated value of an investment becomes due and payable. MONEY MARKET: The market in which short-term debt instruments (bills, commercial paper, bankers' acceptances, etc.)are issued and traded. NATIONALLY REGOGNIZED STATISTICAL RATINGS ORGANIZATION (NRSRO): A credit rating agency that provides credit ratings that are used by the U.S. government and investors as benchmarks. Examples include Moody's, Standard& Poor's, and Fitch Ratings. OFFER: The price asked by a seller of securities. PAPER GAIN OR LOSS: Term used for unrealized gain or loss on securities being held in a portfolio based on comparison of current market quotes and their original cost. This situation exists as long as the security is held while there is a difference between cost value (book value)and the market value. PAR: The stated maturity value, or face value, of a security. PORTFOLIO: Collection of securities held by an investor. PREMIUM: The amount by which the price paid for a security exceeds the par value. Also, the amount that must be paid over the par value to call an issue before maturity. PRIMARY DEALER: A group of government securities dealers who submit daily reports of market activity and positions and monthly financial statements to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and are subject to its informal oversight. Primary dealers include Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)- registered securities broker-dealers, banks, and a few unregulated firms. PRUDENT PERSON RULE: An investment standard. In some states the law requires that a fiduciary, such as a trustee, may invest money only in a list of securities selected by the custody state--the so-called legal list. In other states the trustee may invest in a security if it is one which would be bought by a prudent person of discretion and intelligence who is seeking a reasonable income and preservation of capital. QUALIFIED PUBLIC DEPOSITORIES: A financial institution which does not claim exemption from the payment of any sales or compensating use or ad valorem taxes under the laws of this state, which has segregated for the benefit of the commission eligible collateral having a value of not less than its maximum liability and which has been approved by the Public Deposit Protection Commission to hold public deposits. -4 - P29 City of Rancho Cucamonga Statement of Investment Policy RATE OF RETURN: The yield obtainable on a security based on its purchase price or its current market price. This may be the amortized yield to maturity on a bond;the current income return. REPURCHASE AGREEMENT (REPO): A holder of securities sells these securities to an investor with an agreement to repurchase them at a fixed price on a fixed date. The security "buyer" in effect lends the "seller" money for the period of the agreement, and the terms of the agreement are structured to compensate him for this. REVERSE REPURCHASE AGREEMENT (REVERSE REPO): A reverse-repurchase agreement (reverse repo) involves an investor borrowing cash from a financial institution in exchange for securities. The investor agrees to repurchase the securities at a specified date for the same cash value plus an agreed upon interest rate. Although the transaction is similar to a repo the purpose of entering into a reverse repo is quite different. While a repo is a straightforward investment of public funds, the reverse repo is a borrowing. RISK: Degree of uncertainty of return on an asset. SAFEKEEPING: A service to customers rendered by banks for a fee whereby securities and valuables of all types and descriptions are held in the bank's vaults for protection. SECONDARY MARKET: A market made for the purchase and sale of outstanding issues following the initial distribution. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION: Agency created by Congress to protect investors in securities transactions by administering securities legislation. STRUCTURED NOTES: Notes issued by Government Sponsored Enterprises (FHLB, FNMA, SLMA, etc.) and Corporations which have imbedded options (e.g., call features, step-up coupons, floating rate coupons, derivative-based returns) into their debt structure. Their market performance is impacted by the fluctuation of interest rates, the volatility of the imbedded options and shifts in the shape of the yield curve. TREASURY BILLS: A non-interest bearing discount security issued by the U.S. Treasury to finance the national debt. Most bills are issued to mature in three months, six months, or one year. TREASURY BONDS: Long-term coupon-bearing U.S. Treasury securities issued as direct obligations of the U.S. Government and having initial maturities of more than 10 years. TREASURY NOTES: Medium-term coupon-bearing U.S. Treasury securities issued as direct obligations of the U.S. Government and having initial maturities from two to 10 years. YIELD: The rate of annual income return on an investment, expressed as a percentage. YIELD TO MATURITY: The rate of annual income return on an investment, minus any premium or plus any discount from par in the purchase price with the adjustment spread over the period from date of purchase to the date of maturity of the bond. Treasury\Annual Investment Policies 14\GLOSSARY I4.doc - 5 - P30 STAFF REPORT "so RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PRO IECTION DISTRICT RANCHO Date: September 17, 2014 CUCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mike Costello, Fire Chief By: Pamela J. Pane, Management Analyst II Subject: Approval of a Resolution Updating the Fire Agencies Insurance Risk Authority (FAIRA) JPA Governing Board of Directors Appointed Representative RECOMMENDATION: Approval of a resolution updating the Fire District Representative(s) appointment to the Fire Agencies Insurance Risk Authority Board of Directors. BACKGROUND: The Fire District has been a member of FAIRA for the past 26 years. FAIRA is the Joint Powers Authority (JPA) that the Fire District currently contracts with to provide general liability, property and vehicle insurance. As a result of the retirement of Fire Chief Mike Bell, who was elected to the Governing Board of Directors, it is necessary to appoint a replacement representative. Although the Fire District is presently reviewing its insurance coverage through both FAIRA and PASIS (workers compensation), in the interim, the District needs to have official representation on the Governing Board. This resolution is intended to update the District's Representative who serves as the primary and also update the alternate Board Members on the JPA. It is recommended that the Fire Board approve the appointment of Deputy Fire Chief Don Cloughesy as the primary representative and Fire Chief Mike Costello as the alternate Board Member. Respectfully submitted, 0-' &covEi+63J 1-7014- Y!za cvfl--C Mike Co - o Fire C ief Attachment: Resolution FD 14-045 P31 RESOLUTION NO. FD 14-045 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT,COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, MAKING AN APPOINTMENT OF ITS REPRESENTATIVE(S) TO THE FIRE AGENCIES INSURANCE RISK AUTHORITY(FAIRA)GOVERNING BOARD OF DIRECTORS WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District is a member agency of a Joint Powers Authority (JPA) for purposes of providing general liability, property and vehicle insurances and administration entitled the "Fire Agencies Insurance Risk Authority" (FAIRA); and WHEREAS, the District is required from time to time to update its primary and alternate representatives to the governing Board of Directors of FAIRA. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby appoint their primary and alternate representatives to the Governing Board of the Fire Agencies Insurance Risk Authority as follows: Primary: Deputy Fire Chief Don Cloughesy Alternate: Fire Chief Mike Costello PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 17th day of September, 2014. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael., President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary P32 I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a regular meeting of said Board held on the 17th day of September 2014. Executed this day of 2014 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary Resolution No. 14-045 - Page 2 of 2 7-� P33 STAFF REPORT k erl crn-mANAGra's Orricr RANCHO Date: September 17, 2014 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council President and Members of the Board John Gillison, City Manager From: Fabian Villenas, Principal Management Analyst By: Deborah Allen, Management Aide— Sustainability Subject: Approval to award a Single Source Professional Services Agreement with Newcomb, Anderson, and McCormick for solar energy engineering services in the amount not to exceed $65,400 funded from account 1025001-5300 (Capitol Reserve/Central Park), 1133303-5300 (LMD#3B/Metrolink), and 3288501-5300 (Capital Improvement/Fire Stations); and authorize the appropriation of $13,080 from Fund 1700312-5300 (Epicenter) for the additional solar site. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve to award a Single Source Professional Services Agreement with Newcomb, Anderson, and McCormick for solar energy engineering services in the amount not to exceed $65,400 funded from account 1025001-5300 (Capitol Reserve/Central Park), 1133303-5300 (LMD#3B/Metrolink), and 3288501-5300 (Capital Improvement/Fire Stations); and authorize the appropriation of $13,080 from Fund 1700312-5300 (Epicenter) for the additional solar site. BACKGROUND The City is a member agency of the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) which serves as the County's Council of Governments (COG). SANBAG has undertaken a number of regional efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in San Bernardino County. In September 2012, SANBAG initiated the feasibility of conducting a countywide joint solar power procurement initiative and invited cities and other public agencies to participate. In October 2013, the solar feasibility study was completed and distributed. The first phase of the Joint Solar Power Procurement project was paid almost entirely by SANBAG. Through a competitive bidding process, SANBAG selected and contracted with Newcomb, Anderson, and McCormick to provide solar energy engineering services, beginning with a solar feasibility study for each site submitted by the participating cities and agencies. The feasibility study encompassed 19 cities and agencies and 48 potential solar photovoltaic sites. In order to take advantage of economies of scale and the potential savings that a joint procurement could produce with multiple agencies joining together, the City participated by submitting six city facilities. The analysis demonstrated that solar installation at selected city facilities would be beneficial based on energy savings produced, life cycle cost of the solar photovoltaic system, and ownership payback. In July 2014, SANBAG notified the City that the Joint Solar Procurement Project would not be moving forward beyond the feasibility study phase. Unfortunately, there was not enough interest by APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES pAGp 2 AGREEMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF$65,400 TO NEWCOMB,ANDERSON,AND McCORMICK FOR ENERGY ENGINEERING SERVICES SEI9'ITUBER 17,2014 the participating agencies to continue on to the next phase of going out to bid for the installation of the solar photovoltaic panels. Despite the SANBAG-led joint procurement project not moving forward, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is interested in pursuing solar energy for its facilities and further exploring the potential energy savings that solar energy can provide. An updated analysis by Newcomb, Anderson & McCormick demonstrated that five of the six city facilities - Central Park, Metrolink station, Banyan and Day Creek fire stations, and the Epicenter would clearly benefit from solar energy and generate $5,250,143 in energy savings over the life of the systems. The sixth site, the Animal Center, did not generate substantial savings, and therefore is not recommended for further consideration. Below is a summary of the recommended sites: Fund . Site Total Updated Total Site Name Category Payback System Estimated Revenue (in Size Capitol (Bill years) _ (kW) Costs . Savings) Central Park General Fund 16 782 ($2,891,244) $5,807,125 RC Metrolink General Fund 16 72 Station ($343,493) $702,095 Banyan Fire Fire District 19 76 Station #175 ($66,790) $110,225 Day Creek Fire Fire District 16 84 Station #173 ($344,042) $693,031 Epicenter/Sports Special Fund Complex General Fund 20 798 (2,950,400) $4,525,326 TOTALS 1014 (6,595,969) $11,846,112 As staff originally believed that the SANBAG-led joint procurement effort was going to move forward, funding for Central Park, Banyan and Day Creek fire stations were included in the FY 2014-2015 budget for Newcomb, Anderson, and McCormick to provide solar energy engineering services through the SANBAG contract for the subsequent phase of the solar procurement process. These services included the preparation of the solar design for specifications and the procurement documents, development of a Request for Proposals (RFP), reviewing vendor proposals, contract negotiations, and construction management of the actual installation. At the July 2, 2014 meeting, the City Council took action to approve a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with SANBAG in order to participate in the joint RFP phase of the program and appropriate additional funding to add the Metrolink station into the process. As the solar energy market prices continue to improve, City staff is also interested in receiving proposals for the Epicenter/Sports Complex. An appropriation of $13,080 from Special Fund 1700312-5300 is requested for the addition of the Epicenter/Sports Complex. Because of the extensive work already performed through the SANBAG contract and their familiarity of City sites, staff is requesting a Single Source Professional Services Agreement to continue to utilize the established project knowledge and expertise provided to date by Newcomb, Anderson, and McCormick. The agreement would entail the preparation and development of a Request for Proposal including solar design for specifications, procurement documents, initial site P35 APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PAGE 3 AGREEMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF$65,400 TO NEWCOMB,ANDERSON,AND McCORMICK FOR ENERGY ENGINEERING SERVICES SEPTEMBER 17,2014 assessments, economic modeling, and the review of vendor proposals to determine technical compliance and output models. Once the RFP's for the potential sites have been received and reviewed, staff will provide Council with recommendation options on moving forward with all, some, or none of the sites, as well as a financing plan, and authorization to continue utilizing the services of Newcomb, Anderson, and McCormick through the installation and construction phase. CONCLUSION Staff recommends that the City Council approve to award a Single Source Professional Services Agreement with Newcomb, Anderson, and McCormick for solar energy engineering services in the amount not to exceed $65,400 funded from account 1025001-5300 (Capitol Reserve/Central Park), 1133303-5300 (LMD#3B/Metrolink), and 3288501-5300 (Capital Improvement/Fire Stations); and authorize the appropriation of $13,080 from Fund 1700312-5300 (Epicenter) for the additional solar site. Respectfully Submitted, p caozertain Deborah Allen Fabian Villenas Management Aide— Sustainability Principal Management Analyst P35-1 MEMORANDUM tat CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Le RANCHO Date: September 17, 2014 CUCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Fire Board Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Debra L. McNay, MMC Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director Subject: Approval of a Resolution Temporarily Changing the Time and Place of Fire District and City Council Meetings RECOMMENDATION It is recommended the Fire Board/City Council approve the attached Resolution temporarily changing the time and place of Fire Protection District and City Council meetings. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On tonight's Consent Agenda is Item M8 approving the contract for renovation of the City Council Chambers. Beginning September 19, 2014 the Public Works Services Department will start the process of removing, replacing and updating the existing council chamber live broadcast, audio/video systems and all related control and electrical systems. The current system dates back to when the Council Chambers was constructed, over 20 years ago, is antiquated, failing and in need of immediate replacement. As a result of the construction activities, the Chambers will be unavailable for regular City Council meetings until after the project is completed. Consequently, arrangements have been made to hold the two meetings in October, and the first meeting in November, at the Cucamonga Valley Water District offices and Board Chambers A Resolution has been prepared to temporarily change the time and place of the Fire Protection District and City Council meetings in order to hold these meetings at the Cucamonga Valley Water District during the duration of this project. Respectfully submitted, j. Debra L. McNay, MMC Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager P35-2 RESOLUTION NO. FD 14-048 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE DAYS, TIME AND PLACE OF TEMPORARY REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1 : Temporary Regular Meetings of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District shall be held in the Cucamonga Valley Water District Office located at 10400 Ashford Street, Rancho Cucamonga, California, on Wednesday, October 1, 2014, Wednesday, October 15, 2014 and Wednesday, November 5, 2014. Each temporary regular meeting shall commence at 5:30 p.m. in the Lunch Room at the District Office for purposes of conducting an Executive Session only. The remainder of each such meeting shall commence and be conducted at 7:00 p.m. in the Board Room at the District Office. Please see the following page for formal adoption,certification and signatures Resolution FD No. 14-048 P35-3 Page 2 of 2 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 17'h day of September, 2014. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District at a Regular Meeting held on the 17T" day of September, 2014. Executed this 18'h day of September, 2014, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary • P35-4 STAFF REPORT PUBIC WORKS SERVICES DEPARTMENT I S Date: September 17, 2014 14 4� To: Mayor and Members of the City Council RANCHO President and Members of the Board of Directors CtICAMGNGA John R. Gillison, City Manager From: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director Mike Costello, Fire Chief By: Ty Quaintance, Facilities Superintendent Ken Fung, Assistant Engineer Ruth Cain, Acting Senior Buyer Subject: ACCEPT THE PROPOSALS RECEIVED, AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF A CONTRACT IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $270,000 FOR THE "CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEDIA SYSTEMS REVITALIZATION" PROJECT IN ACCORDANCE WITH RFP #14/15-101,TO SPINITAR OF LA MIRADA AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 20% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $54,000 TO BE FUNDED FROM 1025001-5602 (CITY CAPITAL OUTLAY-BUILDING AND IMPROVEMENTS - $270,000) AND 3288501-5602 (FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT CAPITAL OUTLAY-BUILDING AND IMPROVEMENTS- $54,000); AND APPROVE AN APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $270,000 FROM THE CITY CAPITAL RESERVE ACCOUNT FUND (025) INTO ACCOUNT 1025001-5602 AND APPROVE AN APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $54,000 FROM THE FIRE DISTRICT CAPITAL RESERVES ACCOUNT FUND (288) INTO ACCOUNT 3288501-5602 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the proposals received, award and authorize the execution of a contract in an amount not to exceed $270,000 for the "City Council Chambers Media Systems Revitalization" project in accordance with RFP #14/15-101 to Spinitar of La Mirada and authorize the expenditure of a 20% contingency in the amount of $54,000 to be funded from 1025001-5602 (City Capital Outlay-Building and Improvements - $270,000) and 3288501-5602 (Fire Protection District Capital Outlay- Building and Improvements - $54,000); and approve an appropriation in the amount of $270,000 from the City Capital Reserve (025) account fund balance into account 1025001-5602 and approve an appropriation in the amount of $54,000 from the Fire District Capital Reserves (288) account fund balance into account 3288501-5602. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS This project was identified as a council goal (A37) during the FY 13/14 City Council Goal Setting Session. The current system is antiquated and in need of replacement. A number of components within the existing system were originally installed when the council chambers was built and have far exceeded their life • expectancy. In fact, the lighting control and audio system are no longer supported and replacement parts are not available. Several of the components have been hard wired and control for that portion of the system is no longer possible. When any one or a combination of these systems fail, our ability to provide live broadcast services or to provide audio, video and lighting within the Council Chambers will no longer be possible. A majority of the existing system is still utilizing analog technology and is not compatible with the digital technology being used today. Once this project is complete, the backbone infrastructure and system components will be much more reliable and should provide a better experience for the live audience, home viewers, council members and city staff. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT P35-5 RE:AWARD OF CONTRACT TO SPINITAR FOR THE"CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEDIA SYSTEMS REVITALIZATION"PROJECT SEPTEMBER 17,2014 PAGE 2 Phase one of the "City Council Chambers Media Systems Revitalization" project will include the following highlights: • Relocating the public speaker podium and incorporation of ADA accessibility in the new design • New camera lighting for the dais (softer light with less heat) • New lighting control system for the room • New microphones • New audio and video monitors on the dais for the Council members • Four new flat panel monitors for the audience in the council chamber • New speakers in the audience portion of the council chamber • All new cable and wiring • Replacement of all live broadcast audio/video mixing and production equipment(except the cameras) • Elimination of the current projector and glass panel Beginning September 18, 2014 Public Works staff and Spinitar will start the process of updating and improving the existing council chamber live broadcast and audio/video systems. This work will continue through November 21, 2014. As a result, the live broadcast system will not be available and all City Council meetings during this time will be held at the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) Board room located at 10440 Ashford Street, where all meetings will be recorded and re-broadcast on channel 3. Public Works staff provided detailed specifications for the "City Council Chambers Media Systems Revitalization" project to the Purchasing Division. Purchasing prepared and posted formal RFP #14/15-101 to the City's automated procurement system. As a result, there were two hundred twelve (212) vendors notified, nineteen (19) prospective vendors that viewed or downloaded the RFP documentation, and two (2) responses were received and evaluated. An Evaluation Committee consisting of staff from Public Works, City Clerk's office, Information Systems and Purchasing conducted a thorough analysis of the RFP responses, scored and ranked them. The consolidated scores resulted in Spinitar, of La Mirada, as the finalist. Therefore, staff is recommending an award to Spinitar in accordance with the specifications published in RFP #14/15-101. All applicable documentation is on file in the City's electronic procurement system and can be located through the City's website. Respectfully submitted, ap. ris William Wittkopf Mike Costello Public Works Services Director Fire Chief W W:TQ/jau CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P36 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 8/27/2014 through 9/9/2014 Cheek No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00350713 08/27/2014 8TH ST.COLLISION 610.02 0.00 610.02 AP 00350714 08/27/2014 A&V SOFTBALL 3,213.00 0.00 3,213.00 AP 00350715 08/27/2014 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 79.40 0.00 79.40 AP 00350716 08/27/2014 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 6,201.08 0.00 6.201.08 AP 00350717 08/27/2014 AJANEL,JUAN 10.00 0.00 10.00 AP 00350718 08/27/2014 ALL CI'T'IES TOOLS 0.00 803.68 803.68 AP 00350719 08/27/2014 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC. 1,495.77 0.00 1495.77 AP 00350720 08/27/2014 ALLEN,DEBORAH 45.81 0.00 45.81 AP 00350721 08/27/2014 ALPIIAGR APHICS 22.68 0.00 22.68 AP 00350722 08/27/2014 AMERICAN TRAFFIC PRODUCTS INC 476.82 0.00 476.82 AP 00350723 08/27/2014 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 220.24 0.00 220.24 AP 00350724 08/27/2014 AROCIIO.ALMA 888.00 0.00 888.00 AP 00350725 08/27/2014 ASPA 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00350726 08/27/2014 ASST SECURITY 710.00 0.00 710.00 AP 00350727 08/27/2014 ASS! SECURITY 4,800.00 0.00 4.800.00 AP 00350728 08/27/2014 AT&T MOBILITY 0.00 72.53 72.53 AP 00350729 08/27/2014 AVANTS. MARGE 255.00 0.00 255.00 AP 00350730 08/27/2014 BC TRAFFIC SPECIALISTS 650.12 0.00 650.12 AP 0035073! 08/27/2014 BERNELL HYDRAULICS INC 478.69 0.00 478.69 Al' 00350732 08/27/2014 1311ATT1.SATINDEIUIT S. 50.55 0.00 50.55 AR 00350733 08/27/2014 BILLINGS.TOM 200.00 0.00 200.00 Al' 00350734 08/27/2014 CA1.130 1.320.00 0.00 1.320.00 AP 00350735 08/27/2014 CALIFORNIA LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 270.00 0.00 270.00 AP 00350736 08/27/2014 CALIFORNIA PEACE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION 50.00 0.00 50.00 AP 00350737 08/27/2014 CAMI'OS XCLUSIVE 1.750.00 0.00 1.750.00 AP 00350738 08/27/2014 CAPIO 225.00 0.00 225.00 AP 00350739 08/27/2014 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 78.07 452.77 530.84'"" AP 00350740 08/27/2014 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 260.77 517.69 778.46 """ AP 00350741 08/27/2014 CIN'I'AS CORP.#150 1.672.82 0.00 1.672.82 AP 00350742 08/27/2014 CIRIACKS.VALERIE ANN 150.00 0.00 150.00 AP 00350743 08/27/2014 CITY RENTALS 133.50 0.00 133.50 AP 00350744 08/27/2014 CLARION CONSTRUCTION INC 15,000.00 0.00 15.000.00 AP 00350745 08/27/2014 CLARK.KAREN 684.00 0.00 684.00 AP 00350746 08/27/2014 CLARKE PLUMI3ING SPECIALTIES INC. 818.15 0.00 818.15 AP 00350747 08/27/2014 CLEAN ENERGY 594.00 0.00 594.00 AP 00350748 08/27/2014 CLEAR COAST INC 160.00 0.00 160.00 AP 00350749 08/27/2014 CLEARWA FER GRAPHICS INC 752.94 0.00 752.94 AP 00350750 08/27/2014 COCTIEREI.1., DOREEN 86.40 0.00 86.40 AP 00350751 08/27/2014 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL. DISTRIBUTORS INC 449.06 0.00 449.06 AP 00350752 08/27/2014 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 4.830.97 0.00 4,830.97 AP 00350753 08/27/2014 CURRY, KAREN FIX 514.92 0.00 514.92 AP 00350754 08/27/2014 CYBERTECH SYSTEMS& SOFTWARE INC. 2,000.00 0.00 2,000.00 AP 00350755 08/27/2014 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 390.96 0.00 390.96 AP 00350756 08/27/2014 D.R. HORTON LOS ANGELES I IOLDING CO. 20,000.00 0.00 20.000.00 AP 00350757 08/27/2014 DENA, KEEGAN 0.00 450.00 450.00 AP 00350758 08/27/2014 DOLLARI-IIDE,GINGER 96.00 0.00 96.00 Al' 00350759 08/27/2014 DOWNEY,JENNIFER 11.07 0.00 11.07 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: I Current Date: 09/10/2014 Report CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:36:59 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P37 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 8/27/2014 through 9/9/2014 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00350760 08/27/2014 DUGUAY.JOE 52.92 0.00 52.92 AP 00350761 08/27/2014 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 535.62 0.00 535.62 Al' 00350762 08/27/2014 DUNN, ANN MARIE 612.00 0.00 612.00 AP 00350763 08/27/2014 EARLEY. IDA 207.00 0.00 207.00 AP 00350764 08/27/2014 EASTERLING, RAY 297.60 0.00 297.60 AP 00350765 08/27/2014 ECONOLITE CONTROL PRODUCTS INC 25,491.25 0.00 25,491.25 AP 00350766 08/27/2014 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 19,628.00 0.00 19,628.00 AP 00350767 08/27/2014 ENVIRONMENTAL EQUIPMENT SUPPLY(EIS) 837.50 0.00 837.50 Al' 00350768 08/27/2014 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 51.06 0.00 51.06 AP 00350769 08/27/2014 FELICIANO.ANTHONY 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00350770 08/27/2014 PH II LLC 20.000.00 0.00 20.000.00 AP 00350771 08/27/2014 FITZGERALD, MIKE 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00350772 08/27/2014 FLAG SYSTEMS INC. 313.20 0.00 313.20 AP 00350773 08/27/2014 FLEET SERVICES INC. 0.00 83.64 83.64 AP 00350774 08/27/2014 FLEETPRIDE 422.11 0.00 422.11 AP 00350775 08/27/2014 FRAZEE PAINT CENTER 55.57 0.00 55.57 AP 00350776 08/27/2014 GOLDEN STAR TECHNOLOGY INC 1.255.81 0.00 1.255.81 Al' 00350777 08/27/2014 GOOD YEAR SOCCER LEAGUE 1.247.00 0.00 1.247.00 AP 00350778 08/27/2014 GOODYEAR* 930.73 0.00 930.73 AP 00350779 08/27/2014 GOSS. ROBERT 0.00 292.12 292.12 AP 00350780 08/27/2014 GRAFFITI TRACKER INC 2.250.00 0.00 2,250.00 AP 00350781 08/27/2014 GRAINGER 421.87 0.00 421.87 AP 00350782 08/27/2014 GRAPHICS FACTORY INC. 299.70 0.00 299.70 AP 00350783 08/27/2014 IIAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 2,215.97 0.00 2215,97 AP 00350784 08/27/2014 HAIGI IT BROWN&BONESTEEL LIT 131.10 0.00 131.10 AP 00350785 08/27/2014 HALT.. KEVIN 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00350786 08/27/2014 HAMILTON. MONIQLIE 960.00 0.00 960.00 AP 00350787 08/27/2014 HAMPTON YOGA 816.00 0.00 816.00 AP 00350788 08/27/2014 HERITAGE EDUCATION GROUP 753.00 0.00 753.00 AP 00350789 08/27/2014 HERNANDEZ, ELAINE 155.20 0.00 155.20 AP 00350790 08/27/2014 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 645 210.59 0.00 210.59 AP 00350791 08/27/2014 HOSE MAN INC 311.72 28.57 340.29*** AP 00350792 08/27/2014 HOTSY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 45.00 0.00 45.00 AP 00350793 08/27/2014 HOY'I'LUMBER CO..SM 0.00 19.68 19.68 AI' 00350794 08/27/2014 INLAND PRESORT& MAILING SERVICES 47.58 0.00 47.58 AP 00350795 08/27/2014 INTERACTIVE DATA CORPORATION 110.23 0.00 110.23 AP 00350796 08/27/2014 JONES AND MAYER.LAW OFFICES OF 18.11956 0.00 18,119.56 AP 00350797 08/27/2014 JOSEFSON. RICHARD 627.00 0.00 627.00 AP 00350798 08/27/2014 KATONA. ROGER 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00350799 08/27/2014 KB HOME 2.20 0.00 2.20 AP 00350800 08/27/2014 KUSSMAUL ELECTRONICS CO 319.64 0.00 319.64 AP 00350801 08/27/2014 KVAC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 0.00 50.00 50.00 AP 00350802 08/27/2014 L S A ASSOCIATES INC 0.00 399.24 399.24 AP 00350803 08/27/2014 LANDORF-RICHARD 0.00 200.00 200.00 AP 00350804 08/27/2014 LAW OFFICES OF KATHY M GANDARA 1,754.41 0.00 1.754.41 AP 00350805 08/27/2014 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 6285.00 0.00 6,285.00 AP 00350806 08/27/2014 LOE[3.STEPHANIE 78.00 0.00 78.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 2 Current Date: 09/10/2014 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:36:59 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P38 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 8/27/2014 through 9/9/2014 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00350807 08/27/2014 LOPEZ.GUILLERMO 100.00 0.00 100.00 Al' 00350808 08/27/2014 MAIN STREET SIGNS 3996.00 0.00 3,996.00 Al' 00350809 08/27/2014 MARLINK SA INC 0.00 162.00 162.00 AP 00350810 08/27/2014 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00 0.00 45.00 AI' 00350811 08/27/2014 MARY S ROBERTS SPAY/NEUTER CLINIC 125.00 0.00 125.00 Al' 00350812 08/27/2014 MASON AND MASON REAL ESTATE APPRAISERS CON 10.07136 0.00 10,073.36 Al' 00350813 08/27/2014 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 46.66 0.00 46.66 AI' 00350814 08/27/2014 MEINEKE CAR CARE CENTER 57.66 0.00 57.66 Al' 00350815 08/27/2014 MIDWEST TAPE 257.91 0.00 257.91 AP 00350816 08/27/2014 MIGHTY MOVERS TRAILERS INC 156.06 0.00 156.06 AP 00350817 08/27/2014 MLIAC ALARM COMPANY 0.00 1,038.00 1.038.00 Al' 00350818 08/27/2014 MILANETTO. MARSIIA 60.00 0.00 60.00 Al' 00350819 08/27/2014 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC& ELECTRONICS USA INC 610.98 0.00 610.98 AP 00350820 08/27/2014 MK AUTO DETAIL INC 0.00 140.00 140.00 AP 00350821 08/27/2014 MORRILL, EVAN - 50.00 0.00 50.00 Al' 00350822 08/27/2014 NAPA AUTO PARTS 0.00 177.97 177.97 AP 00350823 08/27/2014 NASCO 0.00 956.57 956.57 Al' 00350824 08/27/2014 NEXTEL 0.00 162.97 162.97 AP 00350825 08/27/2014 NPI PRODUCTION SERVICES INC 33.800.00 0.00 33,800.00 AP 00350826 08/27/2014 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 2580.35 0.00 2.580.35 AP 00350827 08/27/2014 OCLC INC 532.06 0.00 532.06 AP 00350828 08/27/2014 OFFICE DEPOT 2.959.28 0.00 2.959.28 AP 00350829 08/27/2014 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 255.57 0.00 255.57 AP 00350830 08/27/2014 OPSTAD, KIRSTEN 500.00 0.00 500.00 Al' 00350831 08/27/2014 ORONA- PATRICIA 775.00 0.00 775.00 AP 00350832 08/27/2014 OTT. LAURA 840.00 0.00 840.00 AP 00350833 08/27/2014 O'FF.SHARON 486.00 0.00 486.00 AP 00350834 08/27/2014 PARS 3.500,00 0.00 3.500.00 Al' 00350835 (18/27/2014 PATTON SALES CORP 25.38 0.00 25.38 Al' 00350836 08/27/2014 PEP BOYS 67.81 0.00 67.81 AP 00350837 08/27/2014 PERRY C THOMAS CONSTRUCTION 1.000.00 0.00 1,000.00 AP 00350838 08/27/2014 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 2.121.20 0.00 2,121.20 AP 00350839 08/27/2014 PH&S PRODUCTS LLC 0.00 1,180.00 1.180.00 AP 00350840 08/27/2014 PITNEY BOWES 207.36 0.00 207.36 AP 00350841 08/27/2014 PREMIER WORLD DISCOVERY LLC 5.898.00 0.00 5,898.00 AP 00350842 08/27/2014 PRO SALES GROUP INC 587.73 0.00 587.73 AP 00350843 08/27/2014 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 3.329.05 0.00 3.329.05 AP 00350844 08/27/2014 RAINEY, LATREACE 585.00 0.00 585.00 AP 00350845 08/27/2014 RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY&ARTS FOUND 20.574.00 0.00 20.574.00 Al' 00350846 08/27/2014 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 97.20 0.00 97.20 AP 00350847 08/27/2014 RED WING SHOE STORE 1,743.99 0.00 1,743.99 AP 00350848 08/27/2014 RED WING SHOE STORE 2.061.78 0.00 2.061.78 AP 00350849 08/27/2014 RED WING SHOE STORE 142.88 0.00 142.88 AP 00350850 08/27/2014 REHAB WEST INC 356.06 0.00 356.06 AP 00350851 08/27/2014 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 21 444.60 0.00 21.444.60 AP 00350852 08/27/2014 RIOS,ARNIE 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00350853 08/27/2014 RIPT'ETOE LAW P C 8,943.36 0.00 8,94336 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 3 Current Date: 09/10/2014 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:36:59 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P39 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 8/27/2014 through 9/9/2014 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00350854 08/27/2014 RIVERA,ROXANA AND JUAN 7.56 0.00 7.56 Al' 00350855 08/27/2014 RUBLES, RAtJL P 175.00 0.00 175.00 AP 00350856 08/27/2014 RODRIGUEZ INC. R Y 819.06 1,555.47 2.37453 *** AP 00350857 08/27/2014 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY EDA 0.00 146.00 146.00 AP 00350858 08/27/2014 SAN BERNARDINO CTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 55,143.75 0.00 55,143.75 AP 00350859 08/27/2014 SENECHAL,CALVIN 596.40 0.00 596.40 AP 00350860 08/27/2014 SHOETERIA 2.538.42 0.00 2.538.42 AP 00350861 08/27/2014 SHRED IT 99.60 0.00 99.60 AP 00350862 08/27/2014 SHRED PROS 0.00 45.00 45.00 AP 00350863 08/27/2014 . SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 2.324.95 0.00 2.324.95 Al' 00350864 08/27/2014 SIPIIOMSAY,SID 24.84 0.00 24.84 AP 00350865 08/27/2014 SMART AND FINAL 0.00 80.27 80.27 Al' 00350866 08/27/2014 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,057.89 167.98 1,225.87 *** AP 00350872 08/27/2014 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.107.22 4.727.88 26,835.10*** AP 00350873 08/27/2014 SOUTH LAND FARMERS MARKET ASSOC INC 774.00 0.00 774.00 Al' 00350874 08/27/2014 SI'ARKL.EITS 76.00 0.00 76.00 AP 00350875 08/27/2014 STAPLETON.JOSHUA 0,00 200.10 200.10 AP 00350876 08/27/2014 STRATEGIC ECONOMICS 3.426.87 0.00 3.426.87 Al' 00350877 08/27/2014 TERMINI PROCESSING CENTER 0.00 351.00 351.00 Al' 00350878 08/27/2014 'I'HOMPSON PLUMBING SUPPLY 164.62 0.00 164.62 AP 00350879 08/27/2014 TIIOMPSON.MATTIE 78.00 0.00 78.00 AP 00350880 08/27/2014 TMS MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES 0.00 427.00 427.00 Al' 00350881 08/27/2014 TRACEY,VAL 552.00 0.00 552.00 AP 00350882 08/27/2014 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT#6746022500 1,034.36 0.00 1.034.36 AP 00350883 08/27/2014 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT#6746022500 16.851.22 0.00 16,851.22 AP 00350884 08/27/2014 UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SO CAL 420.00 0.00 420.00 AP 00350885 08/27/2014 UNITED RO'T'ARY BRUSH CORPORATION 1.170.87 0.00 1.170.87 AP 00350886 08/27/2014 UPS 74.02 0.00 74.02 Al' 00350887 08/27/2014 VALLEY POWER SYSTEMS INC 0.00 8.063.58 8,063.58 AP 00350888 08/272014 VAN SCOYOC ASSOCIATES INC 4.000.00 0.00 4,000.00 AP 00350889 08/27/2014 VECCHIO,TOM 244.00 0.00 244.00 AP 00350890 08/27/2014 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 37.03 0.00 37.03 AP 00350892 08/27/2014 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 4.316.38 258452 6.900.90*** Al' 00350893 08/27/2014 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 654.78 0.00 654.78 AP 00350894 08/27/2014 WARREN& CO INC.CARL 530.96 0.00 530.96 AP 00350895 08/27/2014 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1.87220 4.117.62 5.989.82 *** AP 00350896 08/27/2014 WESTCOAST MEDIA 900.50 0.00 90050 AP 00350897 08/27/2014 WOLFROM.RENEE 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00350898 08/27/2014 WORD MILL PUBLISHING 750.00 0.00 750.00 AP 00350899 08/27/2014 ZEE MEDICAL INC 196.76 0.00 196.76 AP 00350900 08/28/2014 BRUCE,INGRID 33.00 0.00 33.00 AP 00350901 08/28/2014 BRUCE.INGRID 712.91 0.00 712.91 AP 00350902 08/28/2014 GUERRA, KELLY 0.00 133.00 133.00 AP 00350903 08/28/2014 PARSAC 0.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 Al' 00350904 08/28/2014 AGIIJNE LI.0 4,000.00 0.00 4,000.00 AP 00350905 08/28/2014 AUTO BODY 2000 1,358.34 0.00 1,358.34 AP 00350909 08/28/2014 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 112.468.11 1,432.23 113,900.34 *** User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 4 Current Date: 09/10/2014 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:36:59 r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P40 AND • RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 8/27/2014 through 9/9/2014 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00350910 08/28/2014 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 729.12 0.00 729.12 AP 00350911 08/28/2014 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 6,051.60 0.00 6,051.60 AP 00350912 08/28/2014 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 1.536.12 125.74 1,661.86*** AP 00350913 08/28/2014 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 387.46 0.00 387.46 AP 00350914 08/28/2014 KME FIRE APPARATUS 0.00 5.028,34 5,028.34 AI' 00350915 08/28/2014 LIMS AUTO INC 7,271.29 0.00 7.271.29 Al' 00350916 08/28/2014 ORKIN PEST CON'T'ROL 1,620.66 0.00 1.620.66 Al' 00350917 08/28/2014 SUNRISE FORD 829.13 0.00 829.13 Al' 00350918 08/28/2014 TOMARK SPORTS INC 1,154.14 0,00 1,154.14 Al' 00350919 08/28/2014 TW TELECOM 1,408.20 0.00 1,408.20 Al' 00350920 08/28/2014 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 0.00 23.17 23.17 Al' 00350921 08/28/2014 VISTA PAINT 2.838.33 0.00 2.838.33 AP 00350922 09/03/2014 ACEY DECY EQUIPMENT INC. 39.60 0.00 39.60 Al' 00350923 09/03/2014 ACTION CI IEMICAL COMPANY 1.111.23 0.00 1,111.23 AP 00350924 09/03/2014 ACTIVE NETWORK.THE 31.112.00 0.00 31,112.00 AP 00350925 09/03/2014 ADVANCED UTILITY SYSTEMS CORP. 905.04 0.00 905.04 AP 00350926 09/03/2014 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 79,40 0.00 79.40 Al' 00350927 09/03/2014 AGUILERA.ISAIAH 2.300.00 0.00 2.300.00 AP 00350928 09/03/2014 ALLIANCE BUS LINES INC, 13.578.90 0.00 13578.90 Al' 00350929 09/03/2014 ALLIED BARTON SECURITY SERVICES LLC 24.081.25 0.00 24.081.25 Al' 00350930 09/03/2014 AMERICAN ASPHALT SOUTH INC 14.787.40 0.00 14.787.40 AP 00350931 09/03/2014 AMERICAN SCALE CO INC • 0.00 351.00 351.00 AP 00350932 09/03/2014 ARMSTRONG CLAREMONT 427.38 0.00 427.38 Al' 00350933 09/03/2014 ASST SECURI'T'Y 335.00 0.00 335.00 Al' 00350934 09/03/2014 AUTO AND RV SPECIALISTS INC. 49.65 0.00 49.65 AP 00350935 09/03/2014 BABE INC. 24.000.00 0.00 24.000.00 AP 00350936 09/03/2014 BLINDS ETC. 305.64 0.00 305.64 AP 00350937 09/03/2014 BRAUN 13LAISING MCLAUGI ILIN 5.608.81 0.00 5,608.81 AP 00350938 09/03/2014 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 498.90 0.00 498.90 AP 00350939 09/03/2014 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 186.75 0.00 186.75 AP 00350940 09/03/2014 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 50.00 0.00 50.00 AP 00350941 09/03/2014 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 55.00 0.00 55.00 Al' 00350942 09/03/2014 CAPIO 225.00 0.00 225.00 AP 00350943 09/03/2014 CAPIO 225.00 0.00 225.00 AP 00350944 09/03/2014 CASTANEDA III. ABEL 0.00 120.00 120.00 Al' 00350945 09/03/2014 CITY REN'T'ALS 296.50 0.00 296.50 AP 00350946 09/03/2014 COAST RECREATION INC 2.858.20 0.00 2,858.20 Al' 00350947 09/03/2014 COBB.ALONZO 128.00 0.00 • 128.00 Al' 00350948 09/03/2014 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS INC 187.92 0.00 187.92 AP 00350949 09/03/2014 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 772.00 0.00 772.00 AP 00350950 09/03/2014 COVE JURUPA AQUATIC CENTER.THE 3.174.00 0.00 3.174.00 AP 00350951 09/03/2014 COVERT, MICHAEL 180.00 0.00 180.00 AP 00350952 09/03/2014 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 637.20 0.00 637.20 AI' 00350953 09/03/2014 DELTA DENTAL. 1,469.88 0.00 1,469.88 AP 00350954 09/03/2014 DELTA DENTAL 39,586.50 0.00 39,586.50 Al' 00350955 09/03/2014 DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL,RELATIONS 675.00 0.00 675.00 AP 00350956 09/03/2014 EDWARD PROFESSIONAL,ADVISIORS 937.50 0.00 937.50 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 5 Current Date: 09/10/2014 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait L Time: 15:36:59 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P41 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 8/27/2014 through 9/9/2014 Cheek No. Cheek Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00350957 09/03/2014 ENVIROMET 0.00 . 1.857.00 1.857.00 AP 00350958 09/03/2014 EII WANDA CLASSICS IA,C 48.39 0.00 48.39 AP 00350959 09/03/2014 FCLO MUSIC THEATRE 475.00 0.00 475.00 AP 00350960 09/03/2014 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD 78.87 0.00 78.87 AP 00350961 09/03/2014 FIELDS.MICHELLE 28.00 0.00 28.00 AP 00350962 09/03/2014 FIRE ETC. 0.00 2,211.60 2,211.60 AP 00350963 09/03/2014 FLATIRON ELECTRIC GROUP INC 10,279.45 0.00 10.279,45 AP 00350964 09/03/2014 FLEET SERVICES INC. 0.00 119.75 119.75 Al' 00350965 09/03/2014 FOLKENS, KIMBERLI 398.71 0.00 398.71 AP 00350966 09/03/2014 GARCIA, KYLA 180.00 0.00 180.00 AP 00350967 09/03/2014 COINS. GALE 64.00 0.00 64.00 AP 00350968 09/03/2014 GONSALVES AND SONJOE A 1045.00 0.00 3,045.00 AP 00350969 09/03/2014 GONZALES. BRIAN 77.00 0.00 77.00 Al' 00350970 09/03/2014 GRACIANO,TAMMIE 0.00 85.00 85.00 AP 00350971 09/03/2014 GRAINGER 756.97 870.81 1,627.78*" AP 00350972 09/03/2014 HABER,JULIE 210.00 0.00 210.00 AP 00350973 09/03/2014 HERITAGE EDUCATION GROUP 394.00 0.00 394.00 AP 00350974 09/032014 HMO ARCHITECTS 0.00 20250.00 20250.00 AP 00350975 09/03/2014 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 645 575.63 0.00 575.63 AP 00350976 09/03/2014 IIOSE MAN INC 16.34 0.00 16.34 AP 00350977 09/03/2014 I IOYT LUMBER CO..SM 0.00 19.01 19.01 AP 00350978 09/03/2014 INTERNATIONAL LINE BUILDERS INC 254.321.18 0.00 254321.18 AP 00350979 09/03/2014 JACOBSEN WEST 199.41 0.00 199.41 AP 00350980 09/03/2014 JAN WAY COMPANY USA INC 478.00 0.00 478.00 AP 00350981 09/03/2014 JDC INC 66.425.40 0.00 66,425.40 AP 00350982 09/03/2014 'JOBS AVAILABLE INC 273.00 0.00 273.00 AP 00350983 09/03/2014 JONES AND MAYER,LAW OFFICES OF 0.00 560.00 560.00 AP 00350984 09/03/2014 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 182,650.52 0.00 182.65052 Al' 00350985 09/03/2014 KONE INC 613.67 0.00 613.67 AP 00350986 09/03/2014 KUBZANSKY.JESSICA 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00350987 09/03/2014 KUBZANSKY,JESSICA 1.067.00 0.00 1,067.00 AP 00350988 09/03/2014 LOPEZ,ANGEL 350.00 0.00 350.00 AP 00350989 09/03/2014 LOUIE'S NURSERY 135.00 0.00 135.00 Al' 00350990 09/03/2014 MACIAS.SAL 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00350991 09/03/2014 MAIN STREET SIGNS 561.38 0.00 561.38 AP 00350992 09/03/2014 MANUEL,MICHAEL 180.00 0.00 180.00 AP 00350993 09/03/2014 MATERIAL SALES UNLIMITED 975.57 0.00 975.57 AP 00350994 09/03/2014 MCFARLAND.YVONNE 65.00 0.00 65.00 AP 00350995 09/03/2014 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 110.48 0.00 110.48 AP 00350996 09/03/2014 MEINEKE CAR CARE CENTER 1,306.80 0.00 1,306.80 AP 00350997 09/03/2014 MIDWEST TAPE 153.94 0.00 153.94 Al' 00350998 09/03/2014 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 27.951.84 0.00 27.951.84 AP 00350999 09/03/2014 MMASC 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00351000 09/03/2014 MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR INC 5.24 0.00 5.24 AP 00351001 09/03/2014 MOUN'T'AIN VIEW SMAL.I.ENG REPAIR 321.19 0.00 321.19 AP 00351002 09/03/2014 ODIMEG WU,SANDRA 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 AP 00351003 09/03/2014 OFFICE DEPOT 2,183:16 0.00 2,183.16 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 6 Current Date: 09/10/2014 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I. Time: 15:36:59 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P42 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 8/27/2014 through 9/9/2014 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00351004 09/03/2014 OLSON,BUZZ 304.00 0.00 304.00 AP 00351005 09/03/2014 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 2.028.51 0.00 2,028.51 AP 00351006 09/03/2014 OPENDNS INC 2,227.50 0.00 2.227.50 ' AP 00351007 09/03/2014 PAT.CAMPAIGN 10.00 0.00 10.00 AP 00351008 09/03/2014 PARK.TAYLOR 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00351009 09/03/2014 PENNING'I'ON.JOHN 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00351010 09/03/2014 PEP BOYS 17.23 0.00 17.23 AP 00351011 09/03/2014 PIONEER MANUFACTURING 3,946.32 0.00 3.946,32 AP 00351012 09/03/2014 POLLOCK, LARRY 359.00 0.00 359.00 AP 00351013 09/03/2014 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 102.45 0.00 102.45 AP 00351014 09/03/2014 PRIN'T'ERS,THE 4,195.20 0.00 4,195.20 AP 00351015 09/03/2014 PRO SALES GROUP INC 630.23 0.00 630.23 AP 00351016 09/03/2014 PRO-PLANET INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 298.20 0.00 298.20 AP 00351017 09/03/2014 PULTE I TOMES CORP 680.71 0.00 680.71 AP 00351018 09/03/2014 RACKED AND READY STEEL 216.00 0.00 216.00 AP 00351019 09/03/2014 RAMIREZ,JOSE J 2,300.00 0.00 2,300.00 AP 00351020 09/03/2014 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 12,666.64 0.00 12,666.64 AP 00351021 09/03/2014 RANCI IO RE.GIONAT.VETERINARY HOSPITAL INC 452.79 0.00 452.79 AP 00351022 09/03/2014 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 115.88 0.00 115.88 AP 00351023 09/03/2014 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DISTRIBU'T'OR 63,67 0.00 63.67 AP 00351024 09/03/2011 REGENTS OF TILE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA 361.57 0.00 361.57 AP 00351025 09/03/2014 RICHLEIGH ASSOCIATES INC 8.538.00 0.00 8-538.00 AP 00351026 09/03/2014 RILES, DAVID 64.00 0.00 64.00 AP 00351027 09/03/2014 RIZZI.TREFONI MICHAEL 854.00 0.00 85490 AP 00351028 09/03/2014 SAN BERNARDINO CTY 16.037.46 0.00 16,037.46 AP 00351029 09/03/2014 SAN BERNARDINO CTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 2,730.00 4.103.00 6.833.00*** AP 00351030 09/03/2014 SBPEA 779.51) 0.00 779.50 AP 00351031 09/03/2014 SEXTON, SHEILA 6.00 0.00 6.00 Al' 00351032 09/03/2014 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 93.38 0.00 93.38 Al' 00351033 09/03/2014 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 150.00 0.00 150.00 AP 00351034 09/03/2014 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 30.51 0.00 30.51 AP 00351035 09/03/2014 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 180.00 0.00 180.00 AP 00351036 09/03/2014 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 325.05 0.00 325.05 AP 00351037 09/03/2014 SMITH,JAYMI LEE - 854.00 0.00 854.00 AP 00351038 09/03/2014 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 3,232.42 382.07 3,614.49*** AP 00351039 09/03/2014 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 2,237.66 0.00 2.237.66 AP 00351040 09/03/2014 SOUTH COAST AQMD 1,566.76 0.00 1,566.76 AP 00351041 09/03/2014 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,237,14 0.00 1,237.14 AP 00351042 09/03/2014 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2.613,93 0.00 2,643.93 AP 00351043 09/03/2014 SOUTHLAND FARMERS MARKET ASSOC INC 620.00 0.00 620.00 AP' 00351044 09/03/2014 SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 414.00 0.00 414.00 AP 00351045 09/03/2014 SOUTHWEST BOULDER AND STONE 3,473.33 0.00 3,473.33 AP 00351046 09/03/2014 S'T'ANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 15,544.07 0.00 15,544.07 AP 00351047 09/03/2014 STOTZ EQUIPMENT 3.266.87 0.00 3,266.87 AP 00351048 09/03/2014 TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 0.00 225.00 225.00 AP 00351049 09/03/2014 TI-IEA'FRE COMPANY,THE 272.63 0.00 272.63 AP 00351050 09/03/2014 THOMPSON PLUMBING SUPPLY 1.582.06 0.00 1,582.06 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 7 Current Date: 09/10/2014 Report: CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED -CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:36:59 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P43 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 8/27/2014 through 9/9/2014 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00351051 09/03/2014 TONG. WENDY Y 1.150.00 0.00 1,150.00 AP 00351052 09/03/2014 TRAINING CONNECTION 650.00 0.00 650.00 AP 00351053 09/03/2014 UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC 37533.00 0.00 37.533.00 AP 00351054 09/03/2014 UNITED ROTARY BRUSH CORPORATION 854.99 0.00 854.99 AP 00351055 09/03/2014 VILLAGE NURSERIES WI IOLESALE LP 336.41 0.00 336.41 AP 00351056 09/03/2014 VORTEX INDUSTRIES INC 964.64 0.00 964.64 AP 00351057 09/03/2014 WAINWRIGHT,JANICE RODGERS 1,530.00 0.00 L530.00 AP 00351058 09/03/2014 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 429.20 0.00 429.20 AP 00351059 09/03/2014 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,731.76 0.00 1,731.76 AP 00351060 09/03/2014 WESTLAND GROUP INC 4,727.29 0.00 4.727.29 Al' 00351061 09/03/2014 WI IITE I(OUSE PHOTO INC 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00351062 09/04/2014 AIRGAS USA I.I.0 0.00 68.86 68.86 AP 00351067 09/04/2014 13RODART BOOKS 6.258.42 0.00 6,258.42 AP 00351068 09/04/2014 CALSENSE 2.049.42 0.00 2,049.42 AP 00351069 09/04/2014 COMP U ZONE 3,249.12 0.00 3,249.12 AP 00351071 09/04/2014 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 94,993.25 0.00 94,993.25 AP 00351072 09/04/2014 EMCOR SERVICE 23,353.76 0.00 23,353.76 AP 00351073 09/04/2014 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 550.26 0.00 550.26 AP 00351074 09/04/2014 GENERATOR SERVICES CO 1,207.22 0.00 1.207.22 AP 00351075 09/04/2014 IIOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 270.48 0.00 270.48 AP 00351076 09/04/2014 HYDRO SCAI'E PRODUCTS INC 1,118.47 0.00 1.418.47 Al' 00351077 09/04/2014 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 940.00 0.00 940.00 AP 00351078 09/04/2014 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 2.809.26 0.00 2.809.26 AP 00351079 09/04/2014 NEC CORPORATION OF AMERICA 25,934.41 0,00 25.934.41 Al' 00351080 09/04/2014 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 902.88 0.00 902.88 AP 00351081 09/04/2014 TARGET 247.93 0.00 247.93 AP 00351082 09/04/2014 UNI FIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 0.00 29.04 29.04 EP 00004595 08/27/2014 MICHAEL. L. DENNIS 90.00 0.00 90.00 EP 00004597 09/03/2014 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCITO CUCAMONGA 113.410.34 0.00 113.410.34 EP 00004598 09/03/2014 FORTISTAR METI LANE GROUP LLC 14,702.90 0.00 14.70290 EP 00004599 09/03/2014 RCPFA 9.971.27 0.00 9.971.27 El' 00004600 09/03/2014 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 2.510.019.00 0.00 2.510.019.00 EP 00004601 09/03/2014 RCCEA 1.116.00 0.00 I-I 16.00 Total City: $4,270,407.05 Total Fire: $70,648.47 Grand Total: $4,341,055.52 Note: xxx Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 8 Current Date: 09/10/2014 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 15:36:59 P44 rn 2 • CO N- 0 0 ' 0 d ° C J N l7 V M N N Q O Q o O U W c ^r E n r 0 E ° f > o co o U M c e o ° a S cc 0 O 0 d 2' 0 n `Cr, m m N n n m E c d 2 c f > ° co F > N M V N � 1° > a C) L 0 T V O O A i O W r r y L o O T co u 00 U of 5 ¢0 C r A ` toN- f co I- m 8« N O o CO r 4 r O1 c o E oi N N ` Of .- y N 0 ° C O 0 o _N_ V W > O C ¢ O X O E n n e to ac ° E 5 U ei 0 O ems° a p n 6 n m O 5 N c e, i 6 o; N o O 0 O E E N o 3- ry > co c co O 0 n co n Co m N 0 CO nj C (0 O N O C I- N 6 N 0 t• LL O O•O OP e D) O N O 0 Co - co N Co N O 5.O C +' m 10. N v N N N a IO !a°" O O C O co- '° C ° E co 0 C N N of V O V V 0 ¢9 U o. e ' C 3 f0 C N 0 01 n c v ° ' E _ C O .. p ri4 3 0 O CO Co n 0 ' °c S U C p • 0 ¢ C Op O O N N m N p N V w 0 cp 0 n O e'f n Y CO O7 p t— e v 0 0 co A> O N V 0 of n 6 • NN c L c \H p Q 0 N co 0 N N N 0 3 0 en N O r ii p p ^L t0 N N O n O CO M >° y Z. CL V ID r 0:). v F O C°N c ° -V N U ° 0. c n \N yy a O N 0 y C co o n O O O Co 0 0 ° a of co N N r O L U G) a vi m 00 0 0 00 ° `r a b C o f ¢ - 10 yy n ui > W c {p 00 m m iU) in N b r ui CO C m 0 O OO f n tO or c N 0) N a p LL ri N N 2 N O— d «_ N 0 0 0 n ° M T N D 'D m UPI^ m 0 O 0 0 E 0 N 0.0 > V a W 1- 0 c v1 N c c 0 M `r 0- co N co m T O °C U N e ° - Vi ❑ co v> ° m C 0 w" O r a r o p E o LE Or C E 0 N O r G U C j CO t ` m a > m y ti m E 1i I 2 m E o K ¢ E y` c o ` A d5 Ern F- o 722 - w$ &> d c - o m m ° . 0 an m ♦ a ♦ < Vt. iccg d > c E g,,' 20 ¢ idN A C U N C N QQt w . U LN L V y U Z, E C o ' < 0 O C w o U m 0 O O >> O CO 0 LL2U C.) 0_ Co) H HUQW {p co CO O —Q > Hrn ( C rc P45 3.0a' L003030 ,-- A 0 A 0 N N 0 0 0 m 0 In 0 A 0 0 0 A 0 0 A W W Q m Q j- O. O 0 0 'C C 0 0 0 0000000000000000000000000000 F C n M O) 0 040404 N N N N N N 0404040404 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 q co co co r 0 0 r co lO r r r r 0 O ' 0 A CO O O N 0 A A 0 CO CO 0 CO 0 0 O. E N r N 0 r r N 0 r r 0 CO n N N N C') CO N O N 0 N N N N O r (' p 0 0 0 0 CO CO N 0 Q Q Q 0 r Q 0 r Q 0 0 0 0 co !� 0 0 0 r Y 0 0 o O a o o O O o 0 0 0 o 0 o O O o o O o o O o 0 0 0 0 0 .- .O d� p „'C — — A n co A 0 0 CO CO N Q O) CO N N 0 0 Q 0 A N 0 N 0 N r r co O 0 p a Q CO 0 0 0 A r m r N A A 0 0 Q 0 0 0 Q CO 0 r 0 CO 0 Q CO Q n CO 0 O. C 0 0 r r r m O r m r r r r r 0 0 r 01 CO CO r r O_ CO_ Q O_ 0 _ _ _ d d 2 0 0 0 0 CO r 0 0 N CO r 0 CO 0 r N CO 0 O) 0 0 0 AO 0 A 0 0 N y 0 0 CO 0 0 04 N 0 < 0 0 C') r N CO 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 Y) Q 0 A 0 0 A C) O < N N A O) r 0 CO r CO r Q 0 CO CO O) 0 0 CO CO 0 CO 0 0 0 r N A 0 CO 0 CO OI A O O O r ' O O 10 CO Cu Cu Cu Cu Cu Cu Cu Cu Cu Cu Cu Cu Cu 0 CO CO CO CO CO CO 0. CO CO N Cu CO CO Cu CO Cu _T Cl a CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO < Cu a Cu a Cu a CO CO Cu¢ a" CO CO Cu a Cu a CO CO CO CO Cu a CU < V 0 0 f V 0) o O o 0 0 0 o N O 00000000000000000000000 0 N 0 CO 0 0 0 n A 0 0 0 CO A A 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 r•q N A 0 0 0 0 01 r C) O A n OI 0 0 0 A 0 0 O O O O N A O 0 0 0 0 A aQ' O r O r .- 0 0 0 O n n 0 O 0 n CO CO r OI N 0 Q CO N N A O A 0 0 0 N O 0 O N O O 0 O 0 0 A A Q 0 N n CO 0 r 0 0 0 n 0 0 N 0 0 0 N Q N 0 0 A 0 0 0 0 0 O Q O .- O r n O n r n 0 0 n n 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 A r O O Q A o r 0 A 0 > O O N 0 CO CO N 0 A CO N 0 N r 0 CO CO 0 CO O 0 O 0 N r 0 IO 0 0 0 r A O Y CO 10 O) O 0 0 A 0 01 A N 0 CO 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 N 0 CO Q Q 0 C 4 O 0 0 0 Q 0 A N CO- 0 0 Q A r 0 A O m 0 lO O m N O 0 n- .- 0 0 0 CO- 0 O o 00000 0 A 0 m 0 m 0 r 0 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 00 Q 0 01 0 0 N 0 0 m m n m Q O Q o IO 0 CO 0 0 0 0 O N O 0 O) o ._;0 O r Q Cl- Q Q n Q N Q N N N Q N N CO r 0.1 .- N CO- CO- N Q r C] Q 0 N n Q O CO Qn 0 0 0 0 0 00000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 A A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O o 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • < V Q N N 0 O N 0 N O N 0 C 0 N 0 0 0 0 O O Q A O 0 N O 0 O 0 0 O A 0 O) CO A 0 A 0 A Q r'Q O O) CO 0 Q 0 N 0 N Q CO. N 0 A N CO • co co_ CO 0 a N Q A 0 V. CO 0 r N CO CO O Q 0 N O Q Q N r A CO N 0 0 CO 0 O • yQ Q ' A 0 0 0 OI 0 N Q CO- 0 0 0 r co- 0 0 0 0 r 0 N 0 A 0 OI 0 0 0 L O O 000000 0 O 00 00 m N r r N 0 0 0 Q 0 O A O O ' A 0 OI O 0 0 0 O 0 Q 0 0 0 0 CJ 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 < 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO S 2 • O N n n < Q C Q N Q N CO N Q n N n r N N n n N n N C < Q 01 CO Q CC C S^, cy O C C Y vf f0 y O 41 ; j n n 00000000000000000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 0 0 m 6 e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 C N > o 0 0000000000000000000000000000000 Va s O m . ... . . . . . . O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C ) m a d' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 it— a 0 LE y M o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 at 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n O 0 O O n O 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 s 2 - « 0 O N Q n 0 0 Q 0 N 0 N n n Q n N n r 61 . N Q n N Q N n Q 0 n Q Q 61 c w y OO C O_ y 7 €5 O 7 . ,H t o Q O 0 r n n n n n n C) n CO Q Q Q Q Q Q r r N n n CO n CO CO Q Q Q Q Q r 0 0 0 0 m 0000000000000000000000000000000 � /� u O N 04 04 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 04 N N N Al N N N N N Lip CO CO n r 0 0 r co 0 A Q r r 0 O N Cl) A 0 0 0 Q Q A A O CO 0 0 0 O O 7 N r N 0 r N N r r n n 0 N N n n N N N 0 N N CO O U d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 0 0 00 - 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° O 0 v mu n ci e O N CC . 0 m O 0 m Y N C Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y U' 0 Z Z Z Z z z Z z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y H Z n Q Q Q Q Q < < Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Z Z Z Z Z z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z D CO CO CO m m m m CO CO CO CO CO CO CO m < < < < < < Q Q < < < < < < 0 U. F F F F F F F F F F F ti F F F F m m m m m m m m m m m m m 0 f N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m o 0 0 z z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z > w w W W w W W w w w w W W W W w ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ Z CC CC CC C4 K CC CC CC CC CC CC CC CC CC m CC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J J . . . . . . >- 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W 0 m CL CC CC K K K K K cc K K cc K K m m 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 `m Z 01 < Q < Q Q < < < < < < < < < a < 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O• fw.� N LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J a _1 < WWWWWWLUW WUJLUWLWLULULUWLULULULULULUWWLUWUJ a w w W W W W W W W W W w w W W W W W W W W W W W W w w w W w W 0 Cu 0000000000000000000000000000000 dJ Cu LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL U. U. U. U. U. LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL U. U. LL LL 0 O .0 st c C C 0 0. 0 E LL 0 y n U 0 O Y N 0 A CO 0 0 O N 0 0 Q 0 r CO 0 CO 0 0 CO 0 Q r Q 0 N 0 CO 0 N C d 8 0 N N 04 N CO CO Q Q 0 0 0 0 N N N 0 0 N N CO CO Q Q 0 0 A A CO CO 0 E 00 a Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q N r N to m IA V C o T C Q U C 5 d pC 0 0 0 1.- ..- E0 .- 0 0 0 0 0 N N N n 8 CI a Y N ¢ Q n W 0 d r X 3 F CC K m d d Z m Z ..... O O U > m0 0 > a o Q U LL J M K CC m m r W U' = Y Y 2 0 L Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N C) a m N ln+) 0 m O ry Q ry 0 t Ay > QUQ y o 8 N r W W w w W W W W W W W W W w w A A m m m m No m < < Q < < W n Ino 0 c., M C') Co In n co Cno 0) n Cnj n CO m In+) CO in co 0n') Cn) CO 0) Co) on loo oo) lon CA') O PI D O > 0 c 0 J co LL co n n co co n n co n n n n n In In In In In n n CO CO CO n In co co co co co m P46 H PS 00 m N A 0 0 m 0 0 0 0) m A m m m A m N A 0 0 A CO 0 O m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > a M 30 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ~ a A en m q N A 000000 A ` N r 0 0 0 0 r 0 0 O) C) ET a O N N N N N Nr O 0 0 N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 N N 0 (� l) (� l' m CJ Q N 0 m V 0 OI Q m m m O O 0 O 0000000000000000000 0 0 0 O 0 LLI O K N Y Q 0 r N r A 0 Q 0 CO A 0 A A 0 CO N N 0 0 0 co 0 N 0 1m m C m O N 0 0 O N CO N 00- 00010 N O 0 0 0 N 0 CO O 0 0 d o q ro '- r m m )q n .r ,r .- .- ,- r .- r r 1- . A o e A r r CO Q m d d 2 N 0 OI O N 0 0 0 m 0 O O r 0 0 0 N 0 Q 0 A r O Cl N 0 A 0 r 0 O N N 0 Q A N 0 O C] O O N 0 0 A 0 0 e N CO 0 0 0 0 O t? O �- A 0 o O) O) A O m 0 0 0 �- 0 (0 e r m O e Q 0 A m r r N r r r r r O r m 0 0 m CO CO CO 0 CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO m CO CO m CO CO 8 am CO CO < am CO < a am am am am CO CO CO CO CO CO ¢ ¢ ¢ a a a o E O O O O N O O 0 N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 N A r 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 N 0 O N N A N O N N 00N- 0A 0 0 A 0 0 N m O r m O A m 0 e? m A 0 m O o r CO r m Q A O o i� m rm LLe 0 '- '- r N r Q N r O N m N '- 0000 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N e N 0 3 0 0 N 0 0 0 O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N A 0 f'1 . 6 To 0 A e 0 0 0 O N 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N m O O N Q 0 O 0 0 0 Q r O 0 O 0 m Q 0 0 O O Q IC) O O N e CO CO m 0 Q O O) o 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 O 0 O O O O A_ O O A 0 e O 0 O O N 0 m 0 0 0 O A 0 O m O m O O O A O 6 O O A r N N r C N o 00 Of 03030 0 0 0 00 0 00 0 m O O 00 00 N CO e m N 0 0 0 m m O O Q O O O CO O OI A O O A N O 0 O N p r r N 0 0 0 m N 0 N N e N N N N N O Q t7 O t7 l7 e Q 0 A r m N r m p] CO 0 0 m 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m+ 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 7 O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 00 N O N 0 0 0 N N e m m a ^ m N N N Y m W N 0001- CD Q_ N O 0 • m 0 0 N Q 0 e 0 0 0 0 N O 0 Q 15 0 N A 0 0 0 0 0 r 0 e r m 0 A m N m OI N 0 A N N 0 0 m A 0 Q m O O O O O O N r 005000010 0 0 0 f N Q N r 1^) CO 0 e O) N O O O O O O O O O 0 m 0 0 0 O CO. O N Q N 0 0 N RI Y 5 N m N N e 0 N 0 C) N Q Q Ti O N N e C) ..t- ' r (7 N r 0 0 m 1p CO C C •C, E CD a) Vr ; P47 M } 1:1_ d U - n o - n c m T OY c o n � a 2 n q 9 8 E a m m 9 r cn m to N q > O N • Nl h N N N TO CO • h O N x O n Y E ry C C O C Cd G « N o ° > 0 mJ n C N 173 °oo II C a n O O R H M o H C O y 7 CU 'O G 0 o a m a U0 a' 0 0 N 010 N C Q c q M Q m 10 • r N N N N m m m q g `m q a a c q 0 H m c m E a m c m P I Q O U e rc P48 er 0 < ° 0) U a 0 f 0 u D .o K T o a O d Y a O f 2 to M N 7 O a i. d a 8 f 0 m q N 6K O N O co CV 0 W A N N O m O Om N x O o m m on o o el N N TT)J CO N ? N • l7 ^ O N O N m_ Of O m O Zit N N O as N C) N C C N co ca E U 0 m n d O m A N N > m a U - A r CO L d r a o m N to V 0 y m N C000 d Q f ro W• O O ` 2 Tr O p p A m m C �+ a YY e o ' U a ay O I 0 O N A c O N A o e > A C, Q m co F- at Z N eC N 0 LL Q U LL p m C Y c c L0 Z A °1 A m m 0 Z m it N Z > > c Q A t 0 A it c U d O 3 E 0 y Q m S 0 o 5 0 o 0 C VI 10 N P 0 € o $ 01 m 0 a c o A > y o U CO (0 K - - Pals 0 co U - a s f > O iI S t ¢ 0 3- a 0_ 2 6 M CD 0 t0 t0 U r q O to N C N 0 N O CD CD 0 el CO 0 h_ 0 0 O Co O ID N b O N O 0 Yl 0 N- N O el O 1a W 1O 1'! O b N 4- N C j0 0 O f0 O CQ O o N 0 ; O O r- O n p 6 E 0 O l0 O 0 V 4 N E 9 0 0 of o . o o e 05 0 0 0 0 0 V- o 0 0 0 o N wl rl �� I� h O O 0 N N 0 NO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.� O 0 0 O 0 0 0 O Q N p0 O O 0 0 O O O O O 6 0CV ` d 0 0 o °lE a O o 00`C M co- oe cc;w O 3 a 0 a 3 V On>s Q 7 U W t O CO CO 7 L O c m v 0 v L O q O O C O > 5 m° CO CO ca 0 C N N V CO' 0 Q ! F O O O O N a N O o N F /L d A LO 0 O CO N �a O N a- O U a u) 7 0) 7 Q cc 0. 0 0 0 O K z W 2 2 0 0 Q a J u. 3 ° Z' 0 W m ea m r LL E E 0 c Z a g a N d N N K Q U >I Z W N T Q 0 ■ 0 t O W W C Z 0 C J LL LL 0 J O 0 C N at C 0 C E 5 0 0 0 CO ee o U Ol n Q Om 47 0 C o Co O O 0 J S > to - C C N Co Co 0 9 co Y W 0 0 0 m 0) Z 0 Q 0 0 N _g 0 0 1 A °o I. U' b c °o 'C O. m n O o 5 J N 0 !n n V) 1 E 0 K P50 • e O r r am O s C2Q 00000 0000 00000 ON m N • O N- N N O N NON 0 0 0 ` o o m m ° 0O o o @ 0000 0 0 0 0 E n m O m MOM d t0 N O e r N 0 O N m E 0V- MN < O m n 0 015 N N N _ _ U) U ] r r N N E 05 w «, w w w w «. w ' w w w c 0 al v e e o t. o o v e a° a e e e e e e e v a e e e e e e e Q -d r r r r r r 0 0 000 . . . . 0 0 r 0 o r r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000000 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m— 0 N_ W '551 < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < C < < < < < < < < < N �▪ g zzz zzzzzzzz zzzz zzz zzz zzzzzz E N N N N N N N C N r r m !m O l O 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q)O O O O O O O O m L . m mO N 000 000 0 0 N m m N N N 0) r O < < N _N m m m m m m " m a NNN d m o m R h M N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 To co 0 L- c c C C C C C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m m m m m m m m W rn m rn rn rn m rn m > C 7 7 7 = _ Z a W E -179 -0 CO m CO m m m m C. ° ° ° ° V17 -0 ° 0 ° 000000 U '%• t CCC 000004) 4343 C C C c c C C C C C C C C C C C Z O• j LL• LL LL : i- F F- f i- i- i- LL LL U- U- LL LL LL LL• LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL Z cc 5 a d d S caccocco 2 A 3 9 9 B 5 -11117, 15 :d x x -6t3515 x x x Y x LL— Tay A A A Mal CO CO A A A A CO A A A A M C C O r• O 2 2 2 E E E E E E E E 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 LL N >. >, ›.. 0 T Q Q Q Q ¢ Q ¢ Q T T T T T >. T ›. >, >. d d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a d o T T T T m t n N N N N i i i e O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 A c •; 11 000 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 E E m n z Q * N .- 0 0 0 0 � < r N 0 0 N 0 r N 0 r N o 0 tO N t 22 N 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 O 0 0 0 0 O O O o 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r V E y0000 0 0 0c N N N N M 7 f N N N N1� 1- 1� 00 a 0 0 0 M O 1- r n n N N N N N N a p d v U m m m m m m m m m m m m 0 0 0 0- 0 01 0 0 0 N N N m C W Q 10 m m m m m m m N N N 6 0 6 6 0 0 0 m t0 N m m m d a _ c O_ L C C - m d E 00 'c = = LL 005 C 3 0 c 8 0 d Q.. C c 8 t _ p o Z C c ° S2 -0 -0 < W � Q °LL o U -E -E- 48- E LL o U c LL ° Cm o 0 r IL C = C = i l c a = = O U 0 0 K = to =0 O N E u y a Q .E E a 6. w % � . mm ' H Q H H l LLLL E a a E 2 E d 0 E _ a m v n m n m Z - o n = a N > N C LL W 2 d 'u 'U U 'U d U V a v .0 v 'U N n V d C d. 0- 0 0 2 .E E ¢ a = y d ' h y O K K co N 0 0 'C K K S 0 n .D ' W S a m S 0 m K a o S a ;16t 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 21 Ot P 21 g < N a A a a a t d 3 3 3 3 2 c 3 0 N ° 0 S g N -° d- E d 0 aO 0 = y = a 2 0 co C m W W N - - 0 O O C = m Z 0 m 0 A 0 c ✓ CO 0 ; 0 m6 01 W LL > > 0 0 0 0 N M 0 W C] O cu• rls 0 (.75 0 m O N U- C 0 0 0 0 0: z z z - 2 a o ¢ a a 0 `,2Z LL LL LL LL LL Q 0_ 0. 0 0 0 P51 r .at 0 r a m C0 X Q M O M N 00 ry 0 O H .- ` O co 0 0 0 (0 r o r 0 N T N o 0 O O) a a N r O m CO V) M 0 N- r N0 0 ' ' e o o o a i o f ' 0. 60 o ' m ad ' o o 0Io E co N O 00 0 °o m i0 CN) ^ 0 ON r 0 0) m " (0 to m ' 0 r r IO a_ 0 a V M M CO m r .. a O n M 0 0 0 N d d ' a d 0) of 6 r;v E U �I a f0 a n CO 0 0) N N ` V) '- 0 N CO a .- 0 j ( Y) m f N N N r f r CO E N to 69 w w w w w - es 69 w w w C m al e v e e v e v e v e v e e e e v e D o e e e° e m T, o 0 0 Q .- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 N 0 N L'13,1 LL a Q Q Q Q Q Q < < Q < < < < < < < < Q Q Q Q Q Q Q N � ° zzz zzz zzzzzzz zzzzz zzz zzz E fn N N N N N N N .- .- N N N E co N O4 (N OO co co .co co co .co M M M M M O O O m A « 0 O O O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O co 0 a m L I N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N a n r n n n a N m m m A n LA ❑ 8 a N N N 0 o, '- '- -- '- '- - rn m m m m m m m m - -- - 0 • M LL Ui W Q r) y W t o E a a a a o 0 00 -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 c m c o c C C C c c c o C C C C C C C C c c c c c c Z OI 0) LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL Z G S W N N N W N 000004) 0 0 0 0 0 0 N W W W W W -E -E -E Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y LY Y Y LL A R R R A R CO (9 (500 (599 CO R R R R R R R R co CO N _ tel• O 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 LL N 0 0 T 0 0 T T 00000 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 ea',L C C C C C 0 0) A A A 0 R 0) 0 0 0 0 0) 0) R A 0) 01 A C C C ; M O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O MMMMM• Q E #C O O O O co M M N O O O O N r M M 0 O N O O O O O m O 0 0 W 0 W M O N CO N O O O O O N O O O O O CO 0 N O 0 0 0 a a a N 0 N N N N N N N N N 0 N N N N N N N 0 0 M 0 o N N r N r r N N N N N N n N r r N r m L 0 9 0 m 0 0 00 M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 (0 0 0 0 CO 01 m 0 CO E co C 0 CO CO (O 0 IO (O 0 0 10 CO 0 10 (O CO m CO M CO M cn c C W Q m m m m m co a a a a a a a a a a a a CO CO 0 0 d m 9 L_ A C A c 1 L 0 C to m 9 C LL C LL 9 V V S A > = LL a E 'O 0 ~ 0 aix O o Z °c °c 2 v a' O O N LL a 0 U 0 0 0 co ; y N N 0 o 0 d q 0 4) A c 0 a 0 a c E toi 4 a - m - v LL 0 C o H c v LL a F U. K h ¢ m ii E a g LL t o t 3 t a m LL o R ii Z a c m Q Q Q m m m 'o a 0 'U co U a c j a o '0 a w j LL '0 a a a a a a V1 a o O 0 O a 0 0 0 O 0 0 a o 0 w O a o o o o 0 0 0 m M m M to K < 00000 m M M 0 m m m m m CO m o c o 0 0 0 0 0 a s rn 2' 2' rn 2' m co co a li I1 l'i IL 0 IL a o a C A w A R A a " ' 3 3 3 3 ` A F a C CC 0 N 0 c .25 K 0 0 0 a u 0 Y K R v N N CO CO W • '0 a 0 co co 0 Q Q o Q < a a o .. E E °c w n 0 0 0 0 O t 0 E E o 0 n a m K o o E E a a 0 N 9 E o 0 0 0 °o 00 9 0 00 00 N N M CO N N 0 • O O O 0 0 0 Z Z N N Z Z O ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ LL LL LL LL LL LL o o 0 0 0 0 P52 -C ao 0 > ce G O O N O 0 0 0 00 O CI O 0 O• O 00 Q m N N N 0 N Q n LO 0 n O n n n 10 O O n n_ m_LD 0 o Ini 0 00 0 0 0n n w 00 1Oi 1Oi m m d (o O) Q m n N Q o n Ti N ^ P N N E O J co- 0 0 m n n cO N N N N t') Q O N N N O q N ^ co N N N 0 > N N 01 E W 0 Vi N a 19 a Z N 9 e e a e e e a e a e e e e e e e e e 0) Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OO O O O O 0 C. O N U N LL. J « Co Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q m $ z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z E s N d n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n C co o 0 o O o 0 0 o O o o O o 0 o 0 A Y O O o O O O O o 0 o O O o O o C T` A N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Q J N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N — O U Co LL_ W_ Q 7 c 111 d• E a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a C U C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C Z d a) LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL 11 LL E Z 0I > a £ d co d d al d o d d d d d d d — A Q Y Y Y Y Y Y. as U- A co co A A A A co A co CO CO CO CO A CO CO CO O _ LL A y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .O C ::1: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 to il 1 g it , E N 0 ^ n OI CO Q N O ^ N (O O CO Q N n ^ N CO ,0 C 0 0 0 0 Om Q Q Q Q O Q Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 a J co 0 10 iO 0 CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO n Co (7 a d d 0 d 0 N `n in N N CO CO CO CO CO CO N m CO CO CO CO CO CO Co �. rn t Ca j D U O m < O < 0000000 0 0 Ot 0 0 0 Of Of CO 0 co C C W C Q Q Q co co op Q Q N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N E LL D r c d E. = 010 o E a D' d E = LL „ ^ = ii c m U U 0 $ 2 0 7 C a j o Q_ J C C j UUC Il 9 co LL C d a N C LL LL O A 0 0 O K C C 0 N 0 U J J C J E u w `= U. LL y a ¢ �- ¢ A o b y ..0, ¢ _^ a m m E d a n a m w n m T n E J Q C d O 0 d 9J C .O d U 0 0 d N U ^O U 0 a 9 Q m O_' V) C. CC « co o. 3 tn � ¢ acs = a` 3 co o C c o 0 0 A▪ a LL LL CO CO O o m m Co C- N a" 3 3 3 w 2 a a ° U N a d c ~ E Co a) (0 y w CO m H ' o to c 0 el z E 2 ¢ E 2 d F N D W y o N d W o o `d a° > m m = A 3 E ca¢ > E m N Z >_ O O O a I d O O O Co N N N 0 I- O 0 0 Z Z Z J d O 0 0 H O U. 0 0 O F n P53 STAFF REPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT L J Date: September 17, 2014 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: James C. Frost, City Treasu ,r By: Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City I anager/Administrative Services V/ Subject: ADOPTION OF ANNUAL STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY RECOMMENDATION: The City Council reviews the Statement of Investment Policy on an annual basis. It is recommended that the City Council approve and adopt the attached Statement of Investment Policy for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. BACKGROUND: California Government Code Section 53646 requires that the City Treasurer or Chief Fiscal Officer shall annually render to the City Council a Statement of Investment Policy, which shall be considered at a public meeting. Further, the City Council shall also consider any modifications to the investment policy at a public meeting. The proposed investment policy includes three primary modifications for your approval. Additionally, there have been a number of minor enhancements that include updating of terminology and formatting of the document. The three primary modifications to the current Statement of Investment Policy include the addition of the following sections based on standards recently established by the California Municipal Treasurers Association (CMTA): • Delegation of Authority • Internal Controls • Performance The Delegation of Authority section clearly documents and reiterates who is authorized by the City Council to manage the City's investment portfolio based on the City's Municipal Code. The Internal Controls section clearly identifies that an annual process is conducted by an independent external auditor to ensure compliance with the City's policies and procedures as they pertain to treasury management. The Performance section adds a new process that will be initiated whereby staff will compare the City's annual investment performance with the appropriate benchmark or benchmarks and, if necessary, consider making adjustments to future investment strategies as market conditions permit. The addition of these three sections will result in a more comprehensive investment policy for the City. P54 ADOPTION OF ANNUAL STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY PAGE 2 SEPTEMBER 17,2014 The City Council originally adopted a Statement of Investment Policy in July 1987. The City's Investment Policy and practices are based upon federal, state, and local law, as well as prudent money management. The primary goals of the City's policy are: 1) to ensure compliance with all federal, state, and local law governing the investment of monies under the control of the City Treasurer; 2) to protect the City's assets; and 3) to invest public funds prudently. The City Treasurer is authorized to invest the City's funds in accordance with the California Government Code Section 53600 and the investment policy adopted by the City Council. These funds are accounted for in the City's financial system and are reported annually in the City's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). The City Council also receives a monthly investment report as part of the agenda packet for certain scheduled City Council meetings. The City continues to maintain an investment strategy more conservative than required under state law. Additionally, the City Treasurer and Finance staff regularly monitor legislation, government code amendments, and professional practices pertaining to investing of public funds, to ensure the City's Annual Statement of Investment Policy is updated as appropriate. Respectfully submitted, F ,J . Frost City Treasurer Attachments IIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIII 171.4114:1,4 0 rs- % • flita. 0 ' 'k • • '"' • RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY 2014 Prepared by the Administrative Services Department James C. Frost, Treasurer Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Deputy Treasurer Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Sandra G. Ramirez, Management Analyst Ill P56 STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INTRODUCTION This Statement of Investment Policy ("Policy") provides the guidelines for the prudent investment of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's idle cash, and outlines the policies essential to ensuring the safety and fmancial strength of the City's investment portfolio. The investment policy is based on the principles of prudent money management and conforms to all federal, state, and local laws governing the investment of public funds. The goal of the City's investment policy is to enhance the economic status of the City by protecting its pooled cash and to invest public funds to: 1. Meet the daily cash flow needs of the City; 2. Comply with all laws of the State of California regarding investment of public funds; and 3. Achieve a reasonable rate of return while minimizing the potential for capital losses arising from market changes or issuer default. SCOPE The investment policy applies to the investment activities of all funds of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. These funds are accounted for in the City's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) and include the following fund types: General Fund, Special Revenue Funds, Debt Service Funds, Capital Project Funds, Proprietary Funds, as well as Trust and Agency Funds. Bond proceeds shall be invested in accordance with the requirements and restrictions outlined in bond documents as approved by the City Council. Guidelines presented herein are not intended to apply to bond proceeds held by the City or by fiscal agents or trustees for bond holders of City debt. PRUDENCE The City Treasurer, the delegated investment officers, and/or his appointed designee operates the City's pooled cash investment program under the "prudent investor" standard, and shall be applied in managing the overall portfolio. The City Treasurer, the delegated investment officers, and/or his appointed designee acting in accordance with the investment policy and the "prudent investor" standard and exercising due diligence shall be relieved of personal responsibility for an individual security's credit risk or market price changes, provided deviations from expectations are reported in a timely manner and appropriate action is taken to control adverse developments whenever possible. Rev:9/2014 1 P57 Investments shall be made with judgment and care, under circumstances then prevailing, which persons of prudence, discretion, and intelligence exercise in the professional management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived. OBJECTIVE The City of Rancho Cucamonga operates its temporary pooled idle cash investments under the "prudent investor" standard. This affords the City a broad spectrum of investment opportunities as long as the investment is deemed prudent and is allowable under current legislation of the State of California (Government Code Section 53600, et. seq.) and other legal restrictions as the City may impose from time to time. The objective of the investment portfolio is to meet the short and long term cash flow demands of the City. To achieve this objective, the portfolio will be structured to provide Safety of Principal and Liquidity, while then providing a reasonable return on investments. The City may direct its fiscal agents to invest funds associated with bonds or debt issues pending disbursement or reinvestment in "money market mutual funds" that are shares of beneficial interest issued by diversified management companies. The criteria for "money market mutual funds"are more specifically described in California Government Code § 53601(1). INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES Security purchases and holdings will be maintained within statutory limits imposed by Government Code. City policy has been to limit investments more stringently than required under state law. Criteria for selecting investments and the order of priority are: 1. Safety - The safety and risk associated with an investment refers to the potential loss of principal, interest, or combination thereof. The City only operates in those investments that are considered safe. Investments shall be undertaken in a manner that seeks to ensure that capital losses resulting from institution default, broker/dealer default, or the erosion of market value are avoided. The City shall seek to preserve principal by mitigating the two types of risk: credit risk and market risk. • Credit risk, defined as the risk of loss due to failure of the issuer of a security, shall be mitigated by investing in only high quality securities and by diversifying the investment portfolio so that the failure of any one issuer would not unduly harm City cash flow. • Market risk, defined as the risk of market value fluctuations due to overall changes in the general level of interest rates, shall be mitigated by structuring the portfolio. It is explicitly recognized, however, that in a diversified portfolio, occasional measured losses may occur, and must be considered within the context of overall investment return. Rev:9/2014 2 P58 2. Liquidity - This refers to the ability to sell these securities and terminate the agreement in order to receive cash at any moment in time with minimal chance of losing some portion of principal or interest. Liquidity is an important investment quality especially when the need for unexpected funds occasionally occurs. The City's investment portfolio will remain sufficiently liquid to enable the City to meet operating requirements that might be reasonably anticipated. Invested bond proceeds will be structured so as to meet anticipated drawdown requirements. 3. Yield - The City's investment portfolio shall be designed with the objective of attaining a reasonable market rate of return throughout economic cycles, as long as it does not diminish the objectives of Safety and Liquidity. DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY The City Council, as permitted under California Government Code §53607, delegates the responsibility to manage the City of Rancho Cucamonga's investment portfolio to the City Treasurer. The City Treasurer shall be responsible for all transactions undertaken and shall establish a system of controls to regulate the activities of subordinate officials, and their procedures, in the absence of the City Treasurer. Pursuant to Government Code §1190, the City Treasurer has the authority to appoint a Deputy Treasurer or designee to act on behalf of the City. The City Treasurer will provide written authorization in delegating any of his/her authority. ETHICS AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The Treasurer/Deputy Treasurer and employees involved in the investment process shall refrain from personal business activity that could conflict with proper execution of the investment program, or which could impair their ability to make impartial investment decisions. Employees and investment officers shall disclose any material financial interest in financial institutions that conduct business within this jurisdiction, and they shall further disclose any large personal financial/investment positions that could be related to the performance of the City's portfolio, particularly with regard to the time of purchases and sales. The Treasurer/Deputy Treasurer or investment employees are required to file annual disclosure statements as required by the Fair Political Practices Commission(FPPC). AUTHORIZED BROKER-DEALERS The City will transact business only with approved investment securities broker/dealers that are approved as an authorized broker/dealer in compliance with the City selection process. The Treasurer shall request all broker/dealers that wish to do business with the City to provide proof of capitalization to meet the City's needs, and agree to abide by the conditions set forth in this investment policy. All broker/dealers who want to become qualified bidders for investment transactions must have offices in the State of California and provide a current audited financial statement and complete the appropriate City Broker/Dealer Questionnaire and Certification. Rev:9/2014 3 P59 The Treasurer will maintain a list of approved security broker/dealers selected by credit worthiness who are authorized to provide investment services to the City. The City shall at least annually send a copy of the current investment policy to authorized broker/dealers approved to do business with the City. Confirmation of receipt of this policy shall be considered evidence that the broker/dealer has read and understands the City's investment policy and will recommend and execute only transactions suitable for and in compliance with the City's investment policy. AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS The City is governed by California Government Code Section 53600, et. seq. to invest in specific types of securities. The City has further limited the types of securities in which it may invest. Any security not listed in the following table is not a valid investment for the City. The concise list of approved securities is as follows: MAXIMUM INVESTMENTS/DEPOSITS PERCENTAGES MATURITY* (See Government Code Section 53601) Securities of the U.S. Government, or its agencies Unlimited 5 years The Treasurer may invest in bonds, debentures, notes, discount notes, and certain callable and step-up notes** issued by the following United States Government Agencies:Federal Home Loan Banks(FHLB), Federal National Mortgage Association(FNMA), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation(FHLMC), Federal Farm Credit Bank System(FFCB). Municipals (Warrants,Notes& Bonds) 30% 5 years Taxable or tax-exempt bonds, notes, warrants, or other evidences of indebtedness of the State or any local agency within the State of California with a minimum long-term rating of either "A1"by Moody's Investors Service, or "A+"by Standard&Poor's, the minimum short-term rating of either "MIG 1"by Moody's Investors Service, or "SP-1"by Standard&Poor's, (the minimum rating shall apply to any agency, irrespective of any credit enhancement), including bonds, notes, warrants, or other evidences of indebtedness payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue producing property owned, controlled, or operated by either the State or local agency, a department, board, agency, or authority of the State or local agency, or of any local agency within this state. Certificates of Deposit(or Time Deposits) Unlimited 5 years Placed with commercial banks and/or savings and loan companies. Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 30% 5 years FDIC—Insured Certificates of Deposit 30% 5 years Banker's Acceptances 40% 180 days Commercial Paper 25% 270 days Investments in Commercial Paper must be only with corporations having assets in excess of$500,000,000. Must be of"prime"quality of the highest rating or of the highest letter and numerical rating as provided for by Moody's Investor's Service Inc. or Standard & Poor's Corporation. Short term rating of at least 'A' or Al/P1'and a long-term rating of A'is required. Purchases of commercial paper are limited to no more than 10%of the outstanding commercial paper of any single issuer. Local Agency Investment Fund (State Pool) Demand Deposits 50 MM*** Daily Liquidity Rev: 9/2014 4 P60 AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS—(Continued) MAXIMUM INVESTMENTS/DEPOSITS PERCENTAGES MATURITY* Joint Powers Authority(JPA) Investment Pool (Short-Term) 10% Daily Liquidity Deposit of Funds (See Government Code - n/a Section 53630 - Ref. C) Repurchase Agreements (Repos) 20% 1 year The market value of the securities that underlay the repurchase agreement must be valued at 102%or greater of the funds borrowed against the securities and the value must be adjusted no less than quarterly. An executed Master Repurchase Agreement must be on file. Medium Term Corporate Notes 30% 5 years Investments in Medium Term Corporate Notes must be issued by corporations organized and operating within the United States. Securities eligible for investment must be rated "AA" or better by Moody's or Standard& Poor's rating services. Investment Agreements**** 5% 397 days Investment agreements, guaranteed investment contracts,funding agreements, or any other form of corporate note which represents the unconditional obligation of one or more banks, insurance companies or other financial institutions, or are guaranteed by a financial institution, which has an unsecured rating, or which agreement is itself rated, as of the date of execution thereof in one of the two highest rating categories by two or more rating agencies; or, which are collateralized at least 100%with U.S. Government securities. * Maximum term unless expressly authorized by Governing Body and within the prescribed time frame for said approval. **Step-up notes-A step-up note is a financial instrument whose value "depends on"or is "derived from"the value of an underlying asset, reference rate, or index often known generically as a type of derivative. Investments in this type of instruments are limited to debt securities that have periodic increases, or step-up interest rate adjustments that provide upward mobility in yield return. Investments in debt securities, which contain a callable feature are also allowable. ***Limit set by Local Agency Investment Fund(LAIF) Governing Board, not Government Code. ****Percentage limits for Investment Agreements are not intended to apply to bond funds held by the City or by Fiscal Agents or Trustees, in which investment of such funds is under the City's control or direction. INVESTMENT POOLS The Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) is a voluntary investment alternative for California's local governments and special districts authorized by the California Government Code. LAIF is managed by the State Treasurer's Office with oversight by the Local Agency Investment Advisory Board. Rev: 9/2014 5 P61 The City's participation in LAIF was approved by City Council with other authorized investments on July 1987. It is a permitted investment with the knowledge that the fund may invest in some vehicles allowed by statute but not otherwise authorized under the City's authorized investments. All securities in LAIF are purchased under the authority of Government Code Sections 16430 and 16480. All investments are purchased at market, and market valuation is conducted monthly. The City may also invest in shares of beneficial interest issued by a joint powers authority ("JPA") organized pursuant to Section 6509.7 of the California Government Code that invests in the securities and obligations specified in the code and which shall have retained an investment advisor that meets the following criteria: 1. Be registered or exempt from registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission; 2. Have not less than five (5) years of experience investing in the securities and obligations authorized herein, and 3. Have assets under management in excess of five hundred million dollars. SAFEKEEPING OF SECURITIES To protect against potential losses by the collapse of individual securities dealers, all trades will be transacted on a Delivery Versus Payment (DVP) basis. This means that the securities shall be delivered to the City's designated custodian upon receipt of the payment by the City. The securities shall be held in safekeeping by a third party custodian, acting as agent for the City under the terms of a custody agreement executed by the bank and City. The only exception to the foregoing shall be depository accounts and security purchases made with investment pools and certificates of deposit since the purchased securities are not deliverable. Evidence of these investments will be held in the City's vault No outside broker/dealer or advisor may have access to City funds, accounts or investments, and any transfer of funds to or through an outside broker/dealer must be approved by the City Treasurer/Deputy Treasurer. The City strives to maintain the level of investment of all funds as near 100% as possible, through daily and projected cash flow determinations. Idle cash management and investment transactions are the responsibility of the City Treasurer. DIVERSIFICATION AND MAXIMUM MATURITIES It is the policy of the City to diversify its investment portfolio. Assets shall be diversified to eliminate the risk of loss resulting from over-concentration of assets in a specific issuer, security type, and maturities. Diversification strategies shall be determined and revised periodically. Rev:9/2014 6 P62 The purpose of diversifying is to reduce overall portfolio risks while attaining an average market rate of return; therefore, it needs to be conceptualized in terms of maturity, instrument types and issuer. To the extent possible, the City will attempt to match its investments with anticipated cash flow requirements. The maximum maturity of individual investments shall not exceed a maturity of five years from the date of purchase unless the City Council has granted authority to make that investment either specifically or as a part of an investment program approved the City Council. INTERNAL CONTROL The City Treasurer and/or his appointed designee shall establish an annual process of independent review by an external auditor. This review will provide internal control by assuring compliance with policies and procedures. PERFORMANCE The investment performance of the City's operating portfolio shall be evaluated and compared to an appropriate benchmark in order to assess the success of the investment program relative to the City's Safety, Liquidity, and Yield objectives. This review will be conducted annually with the City Treasurer, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services, and Finance Director and, if necessary, consider making adjustments to future investment strategies as market conditions permit. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO REVIEW AND POLICY ADOPTION Outside, independent auditors are required to perform an annual review of the City's Investment Policy, process, and internal controls. The review process is performed as part of the City's annual external audit. The investment policy shall be reviewed annually by the City Council and any modifications made thereto must be approved by the City Council. REPORTING The Treasurer shall prepare and submit a monthly investment report to the City Council and City Manager, which shall include all securities, excluding those held by and invested through trustees. The report shall include the following: • The type of investment, name of the issuer, date of purchase, date of maturity, par and dollar amount invested in all securities. • The weighted average maturity of the investments. Rev: 9/2014 7 P63 • Any funds, investments, or programs including loans that are under the management of contracted parties. • A description of the compliance with the Statement of Investment Policy. • A statement of the City's ability to meet its pooled expenditure requirements for the next six months or provide an explanation as to why sufficient money shall, or may not be available. • The investment portfolio report shall include current market value information for all investments. A monthly market value will be obtained for each security owned by the City. For purposes of reporting, the market value of each security may be obtained from the City's custodian bank or other pricing source(s) utilized by the City's approved brokers. The City Treasurer shall be responsible for reviewing and modifying investment guidelines as conditions warrant and is required to submit same for re-approval to the City Council on an annual basis with or without changes. However, the City Treasurer may, at any time, further restrict the items approved for purchase as deemed appropriate. The basic premise underlying the City's investment philosophy is, and will continue to be, to ensure that money is always safe and available when needed. .' es . est Date 5/,A, City Treasurer City of Rancho Cucamonga Rev: 9/2014 8 P64 City of Rancho Cucamonga Statement of Investment Policy GLOSSARY OF TERMS ACCRUED INTEREST: Interest that has accumulated but has not yet been paid from the most recent interest payment date or issue date to a certain date. AGENCIES: Securities issued by a U.S. government-sponsored entity (GSE) and federally related institutions. Examples of a GSE include: Federal Farm Credit Bank System (FFCB), Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Company (FHLMC-Freddie Mac), Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA-Fannie Mae), and Student Loan Marketing Association (SLMA-Sallie Mae). AMORTIZED COST: The original cost of the principal adjusted for the periodic reduction of any discount or premium from the purchase date until a specific date(also called "Book Value"). ASKED: The price at which securities are offered. BANKERS' ACCEPTANCE (BA): A draft, bill, or exchange accepted by a bank or trust company. The accepting institution guarantees payment of the bill, as well as the issuer. BASIS POINT: One basis point is one hundredth of one percent (.01). As an example, the difference between a security yielding 3.25%and one yielding 3.20% is five basis points. BEAR MARKET: A period of generally pessimistic attitudes and declining market prices. BENCHMARK: A comparative base for measuring the performance or risk tolerance of the investment portfolio. A benchmark should represent a close correlation to the level of risk and the average duration of the portfolio's investments. BID: The price offered by a buyer of securities. (When you are selling securities, you ask for a bid.) BOND: A financial obligation for which the issuer promises to pay the bondholder a specified stream of future cash flows, including periodic interest payments and a principal repayment. BOND EQUIVALENT YIELD: The basis on which yields on notes and bonds are quoted. BOOK VALUE (COST VALUE): The value at which a debt security is shown on the holder's balance sheet. Book value is acquisition cost less amortization of premium or accretion of discount. BROKER: An individual or firm acting as principal in a securities transaction. BULL MARKET: A period of generally optimistic attitudes and increasing market prices. CALLABLE SECURITY: A security that is redeemable by the issuer before the scheduled maturity. Bonds are usually called when the interest rates fall so significantly that the issuer can save money by floating new bonds at lower rates. CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT (CD): A time deposit with a specific maturity evidenced by a Certificate. Large denomination CD's are typically negotiable. - 1 - P65 City of Rancho Cucamonga Statement of Investment Policy COLLATERAL: Securities, evidence of deposit or other property which a borrower pledges to secure repayment of a loan. Also refers to securities pledged by a bank to secure deposits of public monies. COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT (CAFR): The official annual financial report for the City. It includes combined statements and basic financial statements for each individual fund and account group prepared in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles(GAAP). CONSTANT MATURITY TREASURY (CMT): An average yield of a specific Treasury maturity sector for a specific time frame. This is a market index for reference of past direction of interest rates for the given Treasury maturity range. COUPON: (a) The annual rate of interest that a bond's issuer promises to pay the bondholder on the bond's face value. (b)A certificate attached to a bond evidencing interest due on a payment date. CUSIP: A unique identifier for a security developed by the Committee of Uniform Security Identification Procedures (CUSIP). The identifier is a nine-digit alphanumeric character. The first six characters identify the issuer, the following two identify the issue, and the final character is a check digit. CUSTODY: A banking service that provides safekeeping for the individual securities in a customer's investment portfolio under a written agreement which also calls for the bank to collect and pay out income, and to buy, sell, receive and deliver securities when ordered to do so by the principal. DEALER: A dealer, as opposed to a broker, acts as a principal in all transactions, buying and selling for his own account. DEBENTURE: A bond secured only by the general credit of the issuer. DELIVERY VERSUS PAYMENT (DVP): Delivery of securities with a simultaneous exchange of money for the securities. DERIVATIVES: (1) Financial instruments whose return profile is linked to, or derived from the movement of one or more underlying index or security, and may include a leveraging factor, or (2) financial contracts based upon notional amounts whose value is derived from an underlying index or security(interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equities or commodities). DISCOUNT: The difference between the cost price of a security and its maturity when quoted at lower than face value. A security selling below original offering price shortly after sale also is considered to be at a discount. DIVERSIFICATION: The practice or concept of investing in a range of securities by sector, maturity, asset class or credit quality in order to reduce and spread financial risk. DURATION: A measure of the sensitivity of the price (the value of principal) of a fixed-income investment to a change in interest rates. Duration is expressed as a number of years. Rising interest rates mean falling bond prices, while declining interest rates mean rising bond prices. FEDERAL CREDIT AGENCIES: Agencies of the Federal government set up to supply credit to various classes of institutions and individuals, e.g., S&L's small business firms, students, farmers, farm cooperatives, and exports. -2 - P66 City of Rancho Cucamonga Statement of Investment Policy FEDERAL FUNDS RATE: The rate of interest at which Fed funds are traded. This rate is currently pegged by the Federal Reserve through open-market operations. FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS (FHLB): Government sponsored wholesale banks (currently 12 regional banks), which lend funds and provide correspondent banking services to member commercial banks, thrift institutions, credit unions and insurance companies. The mission of the FHLB is to liquefy the housing related assets of its members who must purchase stock in their district bank. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION (FNMA): FNMA, like GNMA was chartered under the Federal National Mortgage Association Act in 1938. FNMA is a federal corporation working under the auspices of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). It is the largest single provider of residential mortgage funds in the United States. Fannie Mae, as the corporation is called, is a private stockholder-owned corporation. The corporation's purchase includes a variety of adjustable mortgages and second loans, in addition to fixed-rate mortgages. FNMA's securities are also highly liquid and are widely accepted. FNMA assumes and guarantees that all security holders will receive timely payment of principal and interest. FEDERAL OPEN MARKET COMMITTEE(FOMC): Consists of seven members of the Federal Reserve Board and five of the twelve Federal Reserve Bank Presidents. The President of the New York Federal Reserve Bank is a permanent member, while the other Presidents serve on a rotating basis. The Committee periodically meets to set Federal Reserve guidelines regarding purchases and sales of Government Securities in the open market as a means of influencing the volume of bank credit and money. FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM: The central bank of the United States created by Congress and consisting of a seven member Board of Governors in Washington, D.C., 12 regional banks and 5,700 commercial banks that are members of the system. FISCAL AGENT: A financial institution with trust powers which acts in a fiduciary capacity for the benefit of the bondholders in enforcing the terms of the bond contract. FULL FAITH AND CREDIT: The unconditional guarantee of the United States Government backing a debt for a repayment. GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION (GNMA or Ginnie Mae): Securities influencing the volume of bank credit guaranteed by GNMA and issued by mortgage bankers, commercial banks, savings and loan associations, and other institutions. Security holder is protected by full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. Ginnie Mae securities are backed by the FHA, VA, or FMHM mortgages. The term "pass-through" is often used to describe Ginnie Maes. INTEREST RATE RISK: The risk associated with declines or rises in interest rates which cause an investment in a fixed-income security to increase or decrease in value. Also called "Market Risk." INVESTMENT AGREEMENTS: An agreement with a financial institution to borrow public funds subject to certain negotiated terms and conditions concerning collateral, liquidity and interest rates. LIQUIDITY: A liquid asset is one that can be converted easily and rapidly into cash without a substantial loss of value. -3 - P67 City of Rancho Cucamonga Statement of Investment Policy LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF): A voluntary program created by State statute as an investment alternative for California's local governments and Special Districts under the administration of the California State Treasurer's Office. All securities are purchased under the authority of the Government Code Section 16430 and 16480.4. MARKET VALUE: The price at which a security is trading and could presumably be purchased or sold. MASTER REPURCHASE AGREEMENT: A written contract covering all future transactions between the parties to repurchase — reverse repurchase agreements that establishes each party's rights in the transactions. A master agreement will often specify, among other things, the right of the buyer-lender to liquidate the underlying securities in the event of default by the seller-borrower. MATURITY: The date upon which the principal or stated value of an investment becomes due and payable. MONEY MARKET: The market in which short-term debt instruments (bills, commercial paper, bankers' acceptances, etc.)are issued and traded. NATIONALLY REGOGNIZED STATISTICAL RATINGS ORGANIZATION (NRSRO): A credit rating agency that provides credit ratings that are used by the U.S. government and investors as benchmarks. Examples include Moody's, Standard& Poor's, and Fitch Ratings. OFFER: The price asked by a seller of securities. PAPER GAIN OR LOSS: Term used for unrealized gain or loss on securities being held in a portfolio based on comparison of current market quotes and their original cost. This situation exists as long as the security is held while there is a difference between cost value (book value) and the market value. PAR: The stated maturity value, or face value, of a security. PORTFOLIO: Collection of securities held by an investor. PREMIUM: The amount by which the price paid for a security exceeds the par value. Also, the amount that must be paid over the par value to call an issue before maturity. PRIMARY DEALER: A group of government securities dealers who submit daily reports of market activity and positions and monthly financial statements to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and are subject to its informal oversight. Primary dealers include Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)- registered securities broker-dealers, banks, and a few unregulated firms. PRUDENT PERSON RULE: An investment standard. In some states the law requires that a fiduciary, such as a trustee, may invest money only in a list of securities selected by the custody state--the so-called legal list. In other states the trustee may invest in a security if it is one which would be bought by a prudent person of discretion and intelligence who is seeking a reasonable income and preservation of capital. QUALIFIED PUBLIC DEPOSITORIES: A financial institution which does not claim exemption from the payment of any sales or compensating use or ad valorem taxes under the laws of this state, which has segregated for the benefit of the commission eligible collateral having a value of not less than its maximum liability and which has been approved by the Public Deposit Protection Commission to hold public deposits. -4- P68 City of Rancho Cucamonga Statement of Investment Policy RATE OF RETURN: The yield obtainable on a security based on its purchase price or its current market price. This may be the amortized yield to maturity on a bond; the current income return. REPURCHASE AGREEMENT (REPO): A holder of securities sells these securities to an investor with an agreement to repurchase them at a fixed price on a fixed date. The security "buyer" in effect lends the "seller" money for the period of the agreement, and the terms of the agreement are structured to compensate him for this. REVERSE REPURCHASE AGREEMENT (REVERSE REPO): A reverse-repurchase agreement (reverse repo) involves an investor borrowing cash from a financial institution in exchange for securities. The investor agrees to repurchase the securities at a specified date for the same cash value plus an agreed upon interest rate. Although the transaction is similar to a repo the purpose of entering into a reverse repo is quite different. While a repo is a straightforward investment of public funds, the reverse repo is a borrowing. RISK: Degree of uncertainty of return on an asset. SAFEKEEPING: A service to customers rendered by banks for a fee whereby securities and valuables of all types and descriptions are held in the bank's vaults for protection. SECONDARY MARKET: A market made for the purchase and sale of outstanding issues following the initial distribution. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION: Agency created by Congress to protect investors in securities transactions by administering securities legislation. STRUCTURED NOTES: Notes issued by Government Sponsored Enterprises (FHLB, FNMA, SLMA, etc.) and Corporations which have imbedded options (e.g., call features, step-up coupons, floating rate coupons, derivative-based returns) into their debt structure. Their market performance is impacted by the fluctuation of interest rates, the volatility of the imbedded options and shifts in the shape of the yield curve. TREASURY BILLS: A non-interest bearing discount security issued by the U.S. Treasury to finance the national debt. Most bills are issued to mature in three months, six months, or one year. TREASURY BONDS: Long-term coupon-bearing U.S. Treasury securities issued as direct obligations of the U.S. Government and having initial maturities of more than 10 years. TREASURY NOTES: Medium-term coupon-bearing U.S. Treasury securities issued as direct obligations of the U.S. Government and having initial maturities from two to 10 years. YIELD: The rate of annual income return on an investment, expressed as a percentage. YIELD TO MATURITY: The rate of annual income return on an investment, minus any premium or plus any discount from par in the purchase price with the adjustment spread over the period from date of purchase to the date of maturity of the bond. Treasury\Annual Investment Policies 14\GLOSSARY14.doc - 5 - P69 STAFF REPORT Ca ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES GROUP L4_ RANC HO Date: September 17, 2014 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services By: Robert Neiuber, Human Resources Director Subject: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION FOR THE PERIOD 2014-2017 RECOMMENDATION That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt the attached Resolution, approving the Memorandum of Understanding between the City and the San Bernardino Public Employees Association (SBPEA) for the period July 1, 2014 through June 30, 2017. BACKGROUND Representatives of the City and SBPEA have met and conferred in good faith and reached an agreement for a three (3) year labor contract for the period July 1, 2014 through June 30;2017. Employees in this group have had no wage or benefit adjustments since 2009. In 2011, the City implemented a series of pension reform measures to reduce retirement benefits for new employees and require employee contributions toward retirement costs. Subsequently, the State adopted the Public Employees Pension Reform Act of 2012, which created a still lower level of pension benefits for new employees hired after that date. This new MOU was developed in mutual recognition of the current economic conditions in the State of California, the on-going fiscal challenges facing all local agencies, and prudent public policy, while balancing the need to maintain competitive compensation levels. Highlights of the new agreement include an additional contribution of 4% by employees toward the cost of their CaIPERS retirement benefits; the opportunity for a total of 5% in merit-based wage increases during the 3-year term; additional contributions toward employee medical premium costs; increased personal leave time to help with employees work and life balance; increased funding for the purchase and/or replacement of safety footwear and related accessories such as orthotics; and a one-time furlough equivalent payment for those current SBPEA covered employees who personally contributed to the 2010 to 2013 furloughs so that the City could continue to provide the same level of service to the community. The ongoing costs of the agreement are a total of 3.83% of pay over the 3 year term of the MOU, or approximately 1.27% per year. Attachments 1. Resolution 14-166 Approving 2014-2017 San Bernardino Public Employees Association MOU 2. 2014-2017 San Bernardino Public City Employees Association MOU P7O RESOLUTION NO. 14-166 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION RELATIVE TO WAGES, BENEFITS AND OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT FOR THE PERIOD JULY 1, 2014 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2017. A. RECITALS Representatives of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) and the San Bernardino Public Employees Association have met and conferred pursuant to the provisions of the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (California Government Code §3500, et seq.) with regard to wages, benefits and other terms and conditions of employment. Representatives of the City and the San Bernardino Public Employees Association have agreed upon and present to this Council a Memorandum of Understanding pertaining to the San Bernardino Public Employees Association, effective July 1, 2014, specifying the results of said meet and confer process. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. RESOLUTION NOW THEREFORE, the City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does hereby find, determine and resolve as follows: 1. In all respects, as set forth in the Recitals, Part A of this Resolution. 2. The attached Memorandum of Understanding entered into by and between City representatives and the San Bernardino Public Employees Association representatives for the period July 1, 2014 through June 30, 2017, effective July 1, 2014, is hereby approved and ratified by the City Council. 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution. P71 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 17th day of September 2014. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City Council held on the 17th day of September 2014. Executed this 17th day of September, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk Resolution No. 14-166 - Page 2 of 2 P72 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION 2014-2017 P73 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AND THE SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (SBPEA) SECTION 1: RECOGNITION The City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes the San Bernardino Public Employees Association (SBPEA) as the recognized employee organization for City employees in the Maintenance Bargaining Unit, comprised of the following classifications: Maintenance Worker Senior Maintenance Worker Lead Maintenance Worker Maintenance Coordinator Mechanic Lead Mechanic Equipment Operator Electrician Signal and Lighting Coordinator Signal and Lighting Technician Inventory Specialist SECTION 2: COST OF LIVING ADJUSTMENT There shall be no cost of living adjustment (0%) for the term of this agreement. SECTION 3: SALARY STRUCTURE As of the effective date of this MOU, all employees will be assigned to salary ranges which are no less than 20% (40 salary code steps) below the control point and no more than 5% (10 salary code steps) above the control point. Actual salary within the range is determined by performance, achievement of goals and objectives, or for recent appointments, growth within the position. A. Effective the first full pay period in July 2015, the upper end of the salary structure will be increased from 5% (10 salary code steps) above the control point to 7.5% (15 salary code steps) above the control point for the existing salary ranges. This is a 2.5% increase in the available merit based salary ranges. Any individual who has been at the top step of their range for 365 days or more prior to July 1, 2015, shall be eligible for up to a 2.5% step increase effective the first full pay period in July 2015, if their last annual evaluation was meets standards or higher. All other individuals who have been at the top step of their range for fewer than 365 days prior to July 1, 2015, shall be eligible for a 2.5% increase to their current step effective with the first full pay period after their anniversary date, if their annual evaluation after July 1, 2015 is "meets standards" or higher. 1 P74 B. Effective the first full pay period in July 2016, the upper end of the salary structure will be increased from 7.5% (15 salary code steps) above the control point to 10% (20 salary code steps) above the control point for the existing salary ranges. This is a 2.5% increase in the available merit based salary ranges. Any individual who has been at the top step of their range for 365 days or more prior to July 1, 2016, shall be eligible for up to a 2.5% step increase effective the first full pay period in July 2016, if their last annual evaluation was meets standards or higher. All other individuals who have been at the top step of their range for fewer than 365 days prior to July 1, 2016, shall be eligible for a 2.5% increase to their current step effective with the first full pay period after their anniversary date, if their annual evaluation after July 1, 2016 is "meets standards" or higher. SECTION 4: SALARY SURVEY The City shall conduct a salary survey of labor market cities approximately six months before the start of new labor negotiations for the next MOU. SECTION 5: LIFE INSURANCE The City provides $30,000.00 base coverage of life insurance for all employees. Employees who want to purchase additional life insurance coverage with personal funds may do so at the City's group rate. SECTION 6: HEALTH INSURANCE A. EMPLOYEES HIRED BEFORE JULY 1, 1994 The City shall provide employee and family health insurance for all existing full-time continuous salaried employees within the bargaining group, subject to the limitation that no such monthly funding by the City shall exceed the following: $995.60 B. EMPLOYEES HIRED AFTER JULY 1, 1994 The City shall provide employee and family health insurance for all full-time continuous employees within the bargaining group who have been hired on or after July 1, 1994, subject to the limitation that no such monthly funding by the City shall exceed the following: $700 Effective the first full pay period after approval of the MOU by the City Council, this 2 P75 amount will increase by$50 to a total of$750 per month. Effective with the first full pay period in July of 2015, this amount will increase by $50 to a total of$800 per month. Effective with the first full pay period in July of 2016, this amount will increase by $50 to a total of$850 per month. C. CASH IN-LIEU PAYMENT Represented employees who had waived coverage under a City-paid medical insurance plan, and were receiving a cash in-lieu payment in the amount of$200 per month for single coverage or $300 per month for family coverage as of September 30, 2012, may continue to receive this cash in-lieu payment as long as they remain eligible. To be eligible, an employee must provide proof of other medical insurance coverage and must have provided a signed waiver. No other represented employees shall be eligible for this benefit. Employees not receiving cash in-lieu as of September 30, 2012, may still waive coverage by providing the proof of insurance and signed waiver as noted above, but will not receive a cash in-lieu payment. SECTION 7: RETIREE MEDICAL Subject to the conditions stated below, effective upon a service or disability retirement from City service at or beyond age 55 with 10 consecutive years of City service at the time of retirement, retirees shall be eligible to 100% personally fund, without any City contribution, participation in a group health insurance program(s) which is making group health insurance available to the City's retirees. It is agreed and acknowledged by the parties to this MOU that no representation is or can be made by the City, that such group retiree health insurance is available, or if available, will remain available for any specific future period of time. If no such group health insurance is reasonably available, or if the private carrier(s) terminates such coverage as to the retiree group or any individual group member, the City shall have no obligation/duty to self-fund or otherwise provide insurance or replacement insurance. All premiums for the retiree and/or eligible dependents shall be borne by the retiree. The City shall advance and submit the necessary premiums to the carrier(s), subject to the retiree reimbursing the City no later than 30 calendar days after City payment of the premium. Failure to timely reimburse the City shall result in no further premium payments being made by the City, resulting in termination of insurance coverage. 3 P76 The City's duty to advance said premiums shall terminate at age 65 of the retiree, regardless of whether or not the retiree is eligible for Medicare. City shall advise the group carrier of the insured's status as a retiree. Coverage eligibility shall then be solely determined by the group insurance carrier(s). It is likely that premium rates for retirees and/or dependents shall be greater than rates for employees. Regardless, retirees shall pay 100% of said rates. If at any time, it is determined by any group health insurance carrier that the City is prohibited from seeking premium reimbursement from a retiree, City affiliation and retiree enrollment in said group insurance plan shall immediately terminate upon rendering of the insurance carrier's decision. In such case, no retiree shall seek reimbursement from the City for any prior premiums paid by the retiree to the City as and for premium reimbursement. SECTION 8: DENTAL INSURANCE The City shall provide a dental insurance plan for all full-time continuous salaried employees within the bargaining unit. The City agrees to average the cost of dental insurance for all full time continuous salaried employees within the bargaining unit. SECTION 9: OPTICAL INSURANCE The City shall provide an optical insurance plan for all full-time continuous salaried employees within the bargaining unit. The City agrees to average the cost of optical insurance for all full time continuous salaried employees within the bargaining unit. SECTION 10: PREMIUM ONLY PLAN UNDER SECTION 125 A. The City has implemented a Section 125 (premium only plan) that allows pre-tax payroll deductions for employee's contributions for health benefits. B. The City agrees to provide technical assistance (such as automatic payroll deduction,etc.) in the event employees within the bargaining unit decide to expand this benefit from a "premium only plan" to a "flexible spending account" provided that those participating pay all costs incurred in expanding and maintaining this program. SECTION 11: RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNT The City agrees that it shall provide information and allow to be established and implemented, at no cost to the City, a voluntary form of Retiree Health Savings Account. Actual establishment of the Health Savings Account requires the approval of the bargaining unit. SECTION 12: BEREAVEMENT LEAVE When a death occurs in the family of a full time employee, the employee shall be granted 4 P77 up to five (5) bereavement leave days with pay. A death certificate or other acceptable evidence may be required by the City Manager or designee before leave is allowed. Family members are defined as follows: employee's spouse or domestic partner, employee's parents, employee's grandparents, employee's children,employee's siblings, or employee's grandchildren, employee's spouse or domestic partner's parents, employee's spouse or domestic partner's grandparents, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, employee's spouse or domestic partner's children, employee's spouses grandchildren, or a blood relative residing with employee. The City Manager or designee shall approve such bereavement leave. (References to domestic partner refer to registered domestic partners, as defined by California Family Code Section 297). SECTION 13: PERSONAL LEAVE Employees within the bargaining unit can use up to 40 hours of accrued sick leave, vacation, administrative leave or holiday time as personal leave. These 40 hours can be used incrementally (i.e., 1 hour, 1/2 hour) throughout the fiscal year. Use of this time is for situations requiring the employee's attention and addressing work-life balance issues. Personal Leave needs to be cleared with their supervisor when using this time. Personal leave can be taken after six months service. SECTION 14: VACATION All full-time employees within the bargaining unit shall, with continuous service, accrue working hours of vacation monthly according to the following schedule. Vacation can be taken after six months service. Length of Service Hours Accrued Annual Hours In Years Per Pay Period Accrued 1 3.077 80 2 3.461 90 3 3.846 100 4 4.230 110 5 4.615 120 6-8 5.000 130 9 . 5.384 140 10 5.769 150 11-13 6.153 160 14 6.538 170 15+ 6.923 180 SECTION 15: VACATION BUYBACK Annually, at the employee's written request, the City will "buy back," the total cash value of up to 120 hours of previously earned vacation leave. This buy back shall occur twice annually, in April and November. Employees must maintain a minimum of 40 hours of accrued vacation subsequent to any payment of vacation buy back time. Employees who 5 P78 wish to sell back vacation must request payment of not less than 20 hours and not more than 120 hours in a calendar year. SECTION 16: Sick LEAVE Sick leave can be taken after six months service. All full-time employees within the bargaining unit shall, with continuous service, accrue 120 hours of sick leave annually. SECTION 17: SICK LEAVE BUYBACK Employees within the bargaining unit who terminate their city employment after 5 years of continuous service and have at least 50%of five years'sick leave accrued on the books upon termination can sell 120 hours back to the City. SECTION 18: HOLIDAYS The City Offices shall observe the following fourteen (14)holidays. All full time continuous salaried employees within the bargaining unit shall be compensated at their regular rate for these days. (1) July 4 Independence Day (2) First Monday of September Labor Day (3) November 11 Veteran's Day (4) Fourth Thursday of November Thanksgiving Day (8) Day following Thanksgiving (Floater) (6) December 24 Day preceding Christmas (Floater) (7) December 25 Christmas Day (B) January 1 New Years Day (B) Third Monday of January Martin Luther King's Birthday (10) Third Monday of February President's Day (11) Last Monday of May Memorial Day (12) Three discretionary days may be taken by an employee at his/her convenience after six months service subject to approval of the department head. Days may not be carried over from one fiscal year to the next. Whenever a holiday falls on a Sunday, the following Monday shall be observed as a holiday. Whenever a holiday falls on a Friday or Saturday, the preceding Thursday shall be observed as the holiday. When a holiday combination occurs (Thanksgiving, Christmas, etc) where two consecutive days are holidays and it would result in the City Hall being open to serve the public only 2 days during the week, only one of the holidays will be observed and the other holiday will become a floating holiday. For example, for Thanksgiving, Thursday will be observed as the regular holiday; however Friday will become a floating holiday to be used at a later date. For Christmas, Wednesday will be observed as the regular holiday; however Tuesday (the day preceding Christmas) will 6 P79 become a floating holiday to be used at a later date. In the instance of Thanksgiving, Christmas, or New Years, employees will have until June 30 to use those floating holidays accrued between Thanksgiving and New Years. Also, those days will not accrue as floating holidays until the actual holiday has occurred. Each year the City will designate which days will be observed and which are floating holidays. Employees within the bargaining unit who are eligible to bank a holiday have until June 30(end of fiscal year)to use the banked holiday earned from July 1 through April 30. Any holiday banked in May and June, employees have until September 30 to use the banked holiday. SECTION 19: HOLIDAY TIME The City agrees that employees within the bargaining unit who are assigned to work on a holiday, whether or not their regular shift assignment requires they work that day, are eligible for pay at time and one-half for working that day. This time and one-half may be taken as compensation or put in a compensatory time off bank (in effect, compensating at double time and one-half). That rate of compensation is tallied as follows: the ten (10) hours compensation for the holiday, plus compensation at time and one-half for the hours actually worked. This payment at time and one-half abrogates the employee's right to that holiday. SECTION 20: PREMIUM HOLIDAY COMPENSATION Bargaining unit employees required as part of the regular work assignment to work on Christmas Day, New Years Day, Independence Day or Thanksgiving Day, are allowed to observe the holiday on another day. Additionally, these employees who work on the aforementioned designated holidays may select to receive compensation on that holiday at time and one-half for the ten hour shift or take a second holiday as time off at a later date. SECTION 21: NATAL AND ADOPTION LEAVE A. WITH PAY Employees within the bargaining unit are granted up to 2 days natal and adoption leave with pay for the birth or adoption of a child, however, use of the two paid days does not extend any time charged under FMLA or CFRA. Any paid time required beyond this initial 2 days must be charged to sick leave, vacation, compensatory or floating holiday time. B. WITHOUT PAY The City shall provide employees within the bargaining unit up to four months natal and adoption leave for the birth or adoption of a child; such leave shall be pursuant to the provisions of the California Pregnancy Disability Act ("PDA"; California Government Code Section 12945), if applicable. The City's PDA policy is incorporated herein by reference. Employees on this leave of absence without pay beyond the four-month period will be responsible for the payment of medical, 7 P80 dental and optical premiums to keep the coverage in force during the leave of absence. SECTION 22: WORKERS COMPENSATION LEAVE Any employee within the bargaining unit covered herein who is receiving disability payments under the "Workers Compensation Act of California" for on-the-job injuries sustained while engaged in the performance of duties of any such City position, shall receive from the City during the first three months of such disability absence, payments in an amount equal to the difference between the disability payments received under Workers Compensation Act and the employee's full salary. Such payments by the City should be made without any deduction from accrued sick leave benefits. The City's obligation for such payments shall commence on the first (1st) day of such disability absence. In the event the employee's disability absence should exceed three months, an employee shall be allowed to supplement the Workers Compensation benefit received under State law with available accrued sick leave, accrued vacation leave, accrued compensatory time. The total number of leave hours, along with the Workers Compensation benefit, shall not exceed the employee's base pay for each day of the leave. For this purpose, accrued leave hours can only be used in one-hour increments. SECTION 23: MILITARY LEAVE Employees within the bargaining unit required to serve military leave will be compensated pursuant to the Military and Veterans Code. To qualify for compensation the military orders must be submitted to the supervisor prior to their tour of duty and must be attached to the timecard for that pay period. SECTION 24: MILITARY SERVICE BUY BACK Employees within the bargaining unit have the option for military service buy back at the employee's expense. SECTION 25: OVERTIME-MAINTENANCE BARGAINING UNIT The City agrees that employees within the bargaining unit who are, due to health and safety reasons, sent home to rest and to be available to work additional hours as a result of a storm or impending emergency situation and are not subsequently recalled to work, will be compensated for the hours not worked in that shift, due to them having been sent home, to bring the total hours to 10 worked in that shift. Employees within the bargaining unit who are subsequently recalled to work the storm or emergency situation will work no more than 12 consecutive hours, due to health and safety reasons. Any hours worked in excess of 10 in that 12 hour shift will be paid at time and one-half, regardless of the total number of compensated hours for that work week. Employees within the bargaining unit, who have already worked forty(40) hours in a work week, may request time off in order to avoid payment of overtime. It is at the discretion of the supervisor to approve that request. 8 P81 SECTION 26: ON CALL PAY Employees within the bargaining unit required to be on call shall be compensated at the rate of$275.00 per week. SECTION 27: SAFETY FOOTWEAR The City will provide up to $355.00 annually toward the purchase and/or replacement of safety footwear as needed, at a city designated vendor for employees required to wear safety footwear in the performance of their job duties. The $355.00 shall also be available to purchase footwear related accessories including laces, socks, orthotics, or sole inserts. There shall be no change in the current voucher method of funding these footwear items/accessories. SECTION 28: RETIREMENT BENEFIT Unit members who do not meet the definition of"new member" under the California Public Employees' Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA) (those unit members shall be referred to as "classic members") are enrolled in either the CaIPERS retirement plan commonly referred to as the 2.5% at age 55 retirement plan ("Tier 1" and "Tier 2"), or in the 2% at age 55 retirement plan ("Tier 3") and shall be provided the benefits as described below: A. Tier 1 - Employees Hired Before September 1, 2010 § 21354.4 2.5% at 55 Full Formula § 21574 4th Level 1959 Survivor § 20042 1 Yr Final Compensation Until the first full pay period in July 2015, City pays the normal eight percent (8%) CaIPERS member contribution per Resolution 11-063. Effective July 1, 2013, employees shall pay one percentage point (1%) of the normal CaIPERS employer contribution, in addition to the portion of the member contributions described below. Effective with the first full pay period in July 2015, employees will also pay two percent (2%) of their PERSable compensation towards their CaIPERS member contribution, and City pays six percent (6%) of the normal CaIPERS Member contribution. Effective the first full pay period in July 2016, employees will pay an additional two percent (2%) of their PERSable compensation towards their CaPPERS member contribution for a total of four percent (4%), and City pays four percent (4%) of the normal CaIPERS Member contribution. B. Tier 2- Employees Hired Between September 1, 2010 and July 3, 2011 § 21354.4 2.5% at 55 Full Formula § 21574 4th Level 1959 Survivor § 20042 1 Yr Final Compensation 9 P82 Until the first full pay period in July 2015, City pays seven percent (7%) of the normal CaIPERS member contribution; employee pays one percentage point(1%) of the CaIPERS member contribution per Resolution 11-063. Effective the first full pay period in July 2015, employees will pay an additional two percent (2%) of their PERSable compensation towards their Ca:PERS member contribution for a total of three percent(3%), and City pays five percent(5%)of the normal CaIPERS Member contribution. Effective the first full pay period in July 2016, employees will pay an additional two percent (2%) of their PERSable compensation towards their CaIPERS member contribution for a total of five percent (5%), and City pays three percent (3%) of the normal CaIPERS Member contribution. C. Tier 3 - Employees Hired between July 4, 2011 and December 31, 2012, and Employees Deemed "Classic" members hired on or after January 1, 2013: § 21354 2% © 55 Full Formula § 21574 4th Level 1959 Survivor § 20037 3 Yr Final Compensation City pays six percent(6%)of the normal CaIPERS member contribution; employee pays one percentage point (1%) of the CaIPERS member contribution per Resolution 11-063. Effective the first full pay period in July 2015, employees will pay an additional two percent (2%) of their PERSable compensation towards their CaIPERS member contribution. (City pays four percent (4%) of the normal CaIPERS Member contribution and employee pays three percent (3%) of the normal CaIPERS member contribution). Effective the first full pay period in July 2016, employees will pay an additional two percent (2%) of their PERSable compensation towards their CaIPERS member contribution. (City pays two percent (2%) of the normal CaIPERS Member contribution and employee pays five percent(5%) of the normal Ca:PERS member contribution). D. It is understood that all contributions paid by the employee as described in Parts A through C above shall be calculated based upon the full base salary of the employee, plus any additional PERSable compensation, and any Employer Paid Member Contributions (EPMC). E. The City pays EPMC for the various"Tiers"as outlined above and reports the value of EPMC payments as special compensation. The parties agree that to the extent permitted by law, this is special compensation and shall be reported as such pursuant to Title 2 CCR, Section 571(a)(1)(F) as Value of Employer-Paid Member Contributions. The parties also agree that the City has no additional obligation or costs should CaIPERS, the State or the IRS determine otherwise. 10 P83 The City shall adopt necessary resolutions related to the changes in EPMC effective the first full pay period in July of 2015 and the first full pay period in in July of 2016. The City adopted a resolution providing that all employee CaIPERS contributions shall be deducted on a pre-tax basis to the extent permitted by law or IRS • regulation. F. There shall be no sunset date to any provision in Section 28. G. The California Public Employees' Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA) - As it may from time to time exist, the PEPRA shall in its entirety be given full force and effect. Any provision in the 2014-2017 MOU which contradicts any provision of the PEPRA shall be deemed null and void,with the contrary PEPRA provision(s)being given full force and effect. Therefore, no provision of PEPRA shall be deemed to impair any provision of the 2014-2017 MOU. PEPRA includes, but is not limited to, the provisions described below: Unit members hired on and after January 1, 2013, deemed to be a "new member" as defined in Government Code § 7522.04, shall individually pay an initial Member CALPERS contribution rate of 50% of the normal cost rate for the Defined Benefit Plan in which said "new member" is enrolled, rounded to the nearest quarter of 1%, or the current contribution rate of similarly situated employees, whichever is greater. Unit members who are °new members"and miscellaneous employees on and after January 1, 2013, shall be enrolled in the 2% @ 62 retirement formula (Govt. Code § 7522.20). Unit members who are "new members" on and after January 1, 2013, shall have "final compensation" measured by the highest average annual pensionable compensation earned by the member during a period of at least 36 consecutive months (Section 7522.32.), and their retirement benefits shall be calculated based on "pensionable compensation" (Section 7522.10) rather than "compensation earnable" (Section 20636). H. In addition, the City has adopted the PARS Retirement Enhancement Plan generally described as .5% (one-half percent) at 55 or at 60, depending upon the employee's hire date, for all miscellaneous employees hired on or prior to December 31, 2012. To be eligible, employees must be at least age 56, have ten (10) years of full-time continuous service and retire from the City. This benefit will be paid to qualified retirees in addition to any CaIPERS benefits to which they are entitled. 11 P84 SECTION 29: TUITION REIMBURSEMENT FOR APPROVED COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY COURSES Reimbursements by the City of the following enumerated college and/or university course expenses shall not exceed two thousand three hundred dollars ($2,300.00) during any fiscal year. Eligibility for said reimbursement in an amount not to exceed $2,300.00 in any one fiscal year shall be contingent upon a determination by the employee's department head or his designee that all of the following conditions precedent exists: A. Expenses shall be incurred as regards coursework undertaken at a college or university that is licensed/accredited by the State of California. B. The applicant for reimbursement shall represent to the Personnel Department documentation prepared by the accredited/licensed college or university which evidences the applicant's receipt of a grade of"C"or"pass" in a pass/fail class. As regards each class for which reimbursement is sought (where an employee is simultaneously enrolled in multiple approved classes and does not receive a "C" or "pass" in any one or more of such classes, the amount of expenses subject to City's reimbursement shall be reduced and/or as appropriate, pro-rated to reflect no reimbursement being made for expenses related to classes where the minimal grade was not received). C. Eligibility for reimbursement for said expenses shall be confined to either: 1)those courses that in and of themselves consist of curriculum which is predominately related to the development of skills reasonably anticipated by the City to enhance the applicant's job performance (by means of a non-inclusive example only, art classes would not qualify for reimbursement); or 2) where the employee has declared a major that is job-related as set forth in this section C, to those classes which must be completed as a condition precedent to successful completion of the course of study in the selected major. D. Eligibility for reimbursement upon completion of coursework shall be predicated upon the employee's department head or his designee, making a written determination prior to the affected employee's enrollment in the course(s)for which reimbursement is later sought, that the coursework is offered by an accredited college or university and that the above-described job nexus does exist. The determination of the Department Head or his designee in such regard shall be final. E. The costs which shall be subject to reimbursement are limited to the following: 1) tuition, 2.) books, 3) supplies, 4) parking, and 5) laboratory. In addition to all other conditions precedent to reimbursement set forth in this section, prior to reimbursement being approved, written receipts shall be provided to the Personnel Department and shall evidence each expenditure for which reimbursement is sought. SECTION 30: 4/10 WORK WEEK The City of Rancho Cucamonga, City Hall, operates on a 4/10 work week, from 7am to 6pm, Monday through Thursday. Bargaining Unit employees generally work from 6 am 12 P85 to 4:30 pm with a half-hour lunch. Actual days and times of work vary based on the hours of operation at various facilities employees are assigned to. SECTION 31: CARPOOL PROGRAM The City has implemented a well-defined, equitable, carpool program that eliminated the previously provided time-off incentive with a financial incentive. The carpool program is open to all full time regular employees. Participation is voluntary and employees interested in participating shall file a Rideshare Application Agreement and comply with the requirements of the program. The financial incentive for the program is$2.00 per day for every day that the employee carpools. SECTION 32: BI-LINGUAL PAY Employees within the bargaining unit who qualify for bi-lingual pay will be provided at $50.00 per month. SECTION 33: USE OF BULLETIN BOARDS The City will furnish a portion of existing bulletin board space, located in bargaining unit break areas where such bulletin boards currently exist for SBPEA notices. Such space will be no less than 18" x 24". If insufficient bulletin board space exists in a bargaining unit work or break area, the SBPEA may, after receiving approval in writing from the City, put up a bulletin board not to exceed 18" x 24" depending on available space. Bulletin boards shall only be used for the following notices: ➢ Scheduled SBPEA meetings, agenda and minutes. ➢ Information on SBPEA elections and the results. ➢ Information regarding SBPEA social, recreational and related news bulletins. ➢ Reports of official business of SBPEA, including negotiations, reports of committees or the Board of Directors. City equipment, materials, or supplies shall not be used for the preparation, reproduction, or distribution of notices, nor shall such notices be prepared by City employees during their regular work time. Notices that are posted, distributed or placed in an employee's City mailbox shall not be obscene, defamatory or of a political nature. All notices to be posted must be dated and signed by an authorized representative of SBPEA. SECTION 34: ACCESS TO WORK LOCATIONS The parties recognize and agree that in order to maintain good employee relations; it is necessary for Labor Relations Representatives and designated Shop Stewards of SBPEA to confer with bargaining unit employees during working hours. Therefore, SBPEA Labor Relations Representatives or Shop Stewards will be granted access to work locations during regular working hours to investigate and process grievances or appeals. SBPEA Labor Relations Representatives or Shop Stewards shall be granted access upon obtaining advance authorization from the designated management representative prior to 13 P86 entering a work location and after advising the City at least one business day in advance of the requested access, of the general nature of the business. The designated management representative may deny access or terminate access to work locations if, in their judgment, it is deemed that the visit would interfere with the efficiency, safety, or security of City operations. The designated management representative shall not unreasonably withhold timely access to work locations. The City shall ensure that there is at all times someone designated who shall have full authority to approve access. If a request is denied, the designated management representative shall establish a mutually agreeable time for access to the employee. SBPEA Labor Relations Representatives or Shop Stewards granted access to work locations shall limit such visits to a reasonable period of time, taking into consideration the nature of the grievance or appeal. The City shall not unreasonably interfere with SBPEA's access right to work locations and any reasonable denial of access shall not be subject to the grievance procedure. SECTION 35: DUES DEDUCTION SBPEA membership dues and insurance premiums for plans sponsored by SBPEA, provided such plans are not intended to replace City provided health plans, shall be deducted by the City from the pay warrant of each employee covered hereby'who files with the City a written authorization, on a form approved by the City, requesting that such deduction be made. Remittance of the aggregate amount of all membership dues deducted from the pay warrants of employees covered hereby shall be made to SBPEA on a regular basis consistent with the City's regular pay-periods. SBPEA dues shall be deducted in an amount per bi-weekly pay period authorized by the SBPEA Board of Directors. The City shall not be liable to SBPEA, employees, or any party by reason of the requirements of this Article for the remittance of any sum other than those constituting actual deductions made from employee wages earned. SBPEA shall hold the City harmless for any and all claims, demands, suits, orders, judgments or other forms of liability that may arise out of or by reason of action taken by the City under this Article. SECTION 36: USE of CITY RESOURCES SBPEA may be granted permission to use any City facilities accessible to the general public for meeting purposes, during the regular hours such space is accessible to the public, provided space for such meetings can be made available without interfering with City needs and is otherwise not reserved by any other groups or individuals. SBPEA may. also be permitted to use the City Council Chambers, during regular business hours, for SBPEA meetings, provided the City Council Chambers is not otherwise reserved. Permission to use City facilities must be obtained by SBPEA from the appropriate management representative. SBPEA shall be held fully responsible for any damages to, and the security of, any City facilities that are used by SBPEA. SECTION 37: ACTING PAY/OUT OF CLASS PAY The City agrees to formally implement as part of its Personnel Rules and Regulations, a formal policy regarding Acting Pay/Out of Class Pay that substantially complies with existing and past practice in this regard, except that Acting Pay/Out of Class Pay will take effect for SBPEA bargaining unit employees who assume responsibilities of a higher level classification after 16 or more working days at the higher level classification. 14 P87 SECTION 38: FURLOUGH EQUIVALENT PAYMENT SBPEA covered employees who contributed to the City's ongoing viability by participating in the Fiscal Year 2010-2011, 2011-2012 and/or 2012-2013 furloughs would receive a one-time payment estimated to be equivalent to the amount of salary that they personally contributed through the furlough so that the City could continue to provide services to the community and avoid additional layoffs. Qualifying current employees will receive this one-time payment in a separate check no later than one week after the paycheck they receive for the first full pay period after adoption of this MOU. The amount that qualifying employees would receive is set forth in the document provided to SBPEA on September 8, 2014. The City does not intend to report the furlough equivalent pay to PERS as compensation. SECTION 39: HOLIDAY FACILITY CLOSURE City facilities will observe a holiday closure beginning Wednesday, December 24, 2014, through Thursday, January 1, 2015. In future years during the term of this MOU there will be Holiday Facility Closures, and certain City facilities may close in conjunction with the Christmas and New Year's holidays. Closure dates for City facilities shall be determined by the City in order to balance the impact on public services. The City will strive to provide a schedule of Holiday Facility Closures at least six months or more in advance of the closure. During a holiday closure, affected represented employees may take paid leave from holiday, compensatory time, vacation accruals, or use unpaid leave. When holiday closures are implemented by the City, Section 18's provision regarding consecutive holidays shall not apply. SECTION 40: ADOPTION OF MOU This memorandum, between representatives of the City and the San Bernardino Public Employees Association, was adopted on September 17, 2014. SECTION 41: EFFECTIVE DATE The provisions of this memorandum of understanding are effective July 1, 2014 and shall continue for a three-year period, ending June 30, 2017 SBPEA Dated q///p- Dated 15 P88 1'x'1r c l 44 4 !mac► Michael Moore John Gillison, City Manager Labor Relations Representative SC— Brett Lance, Lead Maintenance Worker Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager Administrative Services Kris -'i e' ead Maintenance Worker Robert Neiuber, Human Resources Director iili Glenn, Lead Maintenance Worker Jenifer Phillips, Human Resources Manager aer 416 r Jet/Sand%=1, Maintenance Worker • insi.....r - dy 'pares, Sr. Maintenance Worker 16 T r P89 STAFF REPORT tarn AI yy_u;NR's Ort�u:r: RANCHO Date: September 17, 2014 C VGA MONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council President and Members of the Board John Gillison, City Manager From: Fabian Villenas, Principal Management Analyst By: Deborah Allen, Management Aide — Sustainability Subject: Approval to award a Single Source Professional Services Agreement with Newcomb, Anderson, and McCormick for solar energy engineering services in the amount not to exceed $65,400 funded from account 1025001-5300 (Capitol Reserve/Central Park), 1133303-5300 (LMD#3B/Metrolink), and 3288501-5300 (Capital Improvement/Fire Stations); and authorize the appropriation of $13,080 from Fund 1700312-5300 (Epicenter) for the additional solar site. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve to award a Single Source Professional Services Agreement with Newcomb, Anderson, and McCormick for solar energy engineering services in the amount not to exceed $65,400 funded from account 1025001-5300 (Capitol Reserve/Central Park), 1133303-5300 (LMD#3B/Metrolink), and 3288501-5300 (Capital Improvement/Fire Stations); and authorize the appropriation of $13,080 from Fund 1700312-5300 (Epicenter) for the additional solar site. BACKGROUND The City is a member agency of the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) which serves as the County's Council of Governments (COG). SANBAG has undertaken a number of regional efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in San Bernardino County. In September 2012, SANBAG initiated the feasibility of conducting a countywide joint solar power procurement initiative and invited cities and other public agencies to participate. In October 2013, the solar feasibility study was completed and distributed. The first phase of the Joint Solar Power Procurement project was paid almost entirely by SANBAG. Through a competitive bidding process, SANBAG selected and contracted with Newcomb, Anderson, and McCormick to provide solar energy engineering services, beginning with a solar feasibility study for each site submitted by the participating cities and agencies. The feasibility study encompassed 19 cities and agencies and 48 potential solar photovoltaic sites. In order to take advantage of economies of scale and the potential savings that a joint procurement could produce with multiple agencies joining together, the City participated by submitting six city facilities. The analysis demonstrated that solar installation at selected city facilities would be beneficial based on energy savings produced, life cycle cost of the solar photovoltaic system, and ownership payback. In July 2014, SANBAG notified the City that the Joint Solar Procurement Project would not be moving forward beyond the feasibility study phase. Unfortunately, there was not enough interest by • APPROVE AND AUTI IORIZE THE EXECUTION OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PAGE 2P90 AGREEMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF$65,400 TO NEWCOMB,ANDERSON,AND McCORMICK FOR ENERGY ENGINEERING SERVICES Sr:rrr:NniER 17,2014 the participating agencies to continue on to the next phase of going out to bid for the installation of the solar photovoltaic panels. Despite the SANBAG-led joint procurement project not moving forward, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is interested in pursuing solar energy for its facilities and further exploring the potential energy savings that solar energy can provide. An updated analysis by Newcomb, Anderson & McCormick demonstrated that five of the six city facilities - Central Park, Metrolink station, Banyan and Day Creek fire stations, and the Epicenter would clearly benefit from solar energy and generate $5,250,143 in energy savings over the life of the systems. The sixth site, the Animal Center, did not generate substantial savings, and therefore is not recommended for further consideration. Below is a summary of the recommended sites: Fund Site Total Updated Total Site Name Category Payback System Estimated Revenue (in Size Capitol (Bill years) (kW) Costs Savings) Central Park General Fund 16 782 ($2,891,244) $5,807,125 RC Metrolink General Fund Station 16 72 ($343,493) $702,095 Banyan Fire Fire District 19 76 Station #175 ($66,790) $110,225 Day Creek Fire Fire District Station #173 16 84 St ($344,042) $693,031 Epicenter/Sports Special Fund Complex General Fund 20 798 (2,950,400) $4,525,326 TOTALS 1014 (6,595,969) $11,846,112 As staff originally believed that the SANBAG-led joint procurement effort was going to move forward, funding for Central Park, Banyan and Day Creek fire stations were included in the FY 2014-2015 budget for Newcomb, Anderson, and McCormick to provide solar energy engineering services through the SANBAG contract for the subsequent phase of the solar procurement process. These services included the preparation of the solar design for specifications and the procurement documents, development of a Request for Proposals (RFP), reviewing vendor proposals, contract negotiations, and construction management of the actual installation. At the July 2, 2014 meeting, the City Council took action to approve a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with SANBAG in order to participate in the joint RFP phase of the program and appropriate additional funding to add the Metrolink station into the process. As the solar energy market prices continue to improve, City staff is also interested in receiving proposals for the Epicenter/Sports Complex. An appropriation of $13,080 from Special Fund 1700312-5300 is requested for the addition of the Epicenter/Sports Complex. Because of the extensive work already performed through the SANBAG contract and their familiarity of City sites, staff is requesting a Single Source Professional Services Agreement to continue to utilize the established project knowledge and expertise provided to date by Newcomb, Anderson, and McCormick. The agreement would entail the preparation and development of a Request for Proposal including solar design for specifications, procurement documents, initial site P91 APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RAG:3 AGREEMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF$65,400 TO NEWCOMB,ANDERSON,AND MCCORMICK FOR ENERGY ENGINEERING SERVICES SNIYIENini:R 17,2014 assessments, economic modeling, and the review of vendor proposals to determine technical compliance and output models. Once the RFP's for the potential sites have been received and reviewed, staff will provide Council with recommendation options on moving forward with all, some, or none of the sites, as well as a financing plan, and authorization to continue utilizing the services of Newcomb, Anderson, and McCormick through the installation and construction phase. CONCLUSION Staff recommends that the City Council approve to award a Single Source Professional Services Agreement with Newcomb, Anderson, and McCormick for solar energy engineering services in the amount not to exceed $65,400 funded from account 1025001-5300 (Capitol Reserve/Central Park), 1133303-5300 (LMD#3B/Metrolink), and 3288501-5300 (Capital Improvement/Fire Stations); and authorize the appropriation of $13,080 from Fund 1700312-5300 (Epicenter) for the additional solar site. Respectfully Submitted, Deborah Allen Fabian Villenas Management Aide — Sustainability Principal Management Analyst P92 STAFF REPORT V PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DEPARTMENT 111-10-1 Date: September 17, 2014 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director By: Dean Rodia, Parks and Landscape Superintendent Kenneth Fung, Assistant Engineer Subject: APPROVAL OF SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE PARKS PAINTING PROJECT AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS", TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNTS: 1130303-5300 (LMD 1), 1131303-5300 (LMD 2), 1133303-5300 (LMD 3B), 1134303-5300 (LMD 4), 1140303-5300 (LMD 10) AND 1868203-5300 (CFD 2000-03) RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council approve the specifications for the Parks Painting Project and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids"; to be funded from accounts: 1130303-5300 (LMD 1), 1131303-5300 (LMD 2), 1133303-5300 (LMD 3B), 1134303-5300 (LMD 4), 1140303-5300 (LMD 10) and 1868203-5300 (CFD 2000-03). BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS As part of the City's on-going maintenance of City parks, the Public Works Services Department has initiated a project to paint some of the existing facilities at several parks. The Base Bid will solicit bids to paint the shade shelters at: Ellena Park (LMD 2), Spruce Park (LMD 4) and Day Creek Park (LMD 10). At the parks, the wood and columns will be painted. Another part of the Base Bid will be the painting of the hand railing under the Milliken Avenue/Metrolink Railroad Underpass (LMD 3B) and the painting of the entire restroom building at Summit Park (CFD 2000-03). The bid documents will include multiple Additive Bids to paint additional items at the above mentioned parks. Those items include: other shade shelters, restrooms, trash enclosures, benches, seat/retaining walls, bicycle racks, hand railing and metal fencing. The Base Bid amounts and the funds remaining in each LMD or CFD will determine which, if any, of the Additive Bids will be awarded along with the Base Bid. The Additive Bids not awarded as part of this project will be bid again next fiscal year as part of a subsequent painting project. The scope of next fiscal year's painting project will again be dependent on the funds available in each LMD or CFD. Legal advertising is scheduled for September 23, 2014 and September 30, 2014 with a bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, October 28, 2014, unless extended by Addenda. A mandatory r. P93 APPROVAL OF SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE PARKS PAINTING PROJECT AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE THE"NOTICE INVITING BIDS" SEPTEMBER 17,2014 PAGE 2 pre-bid job walk is scheduled at 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, October 7, 2014. Staff anticipates awarding a contract on November 19, 2014. The contractor will have 40 working days to complete the work. Respectfully submitted, L l►! William Wittkopf Public Works Services Director WW:DR/kf Attachment: Resolution • P94 RESOLUTION NO. 14-167 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE PARKS PAINTING PROJECT IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that the specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the specifications for the "PARKS PAINTING PROJECT" BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, October 28, 2014, sealed bids or proposals for the `PARKS PAINTING PROJECT" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of the "PARKS PAINTING PROJECT" A mandatory Pre-Bid meeting and site tour will be held on Tuesday, October 7, 2014, beginning at 10:00 a.m. Refer to Item "0. Pre-Bid Meeting" of the "Instructions to Bidders" of the bid documents for approximate directions. Attendees are required to sign in at the Pre-Bid meeting. Bids from companies that did not have a representative sign in at the Pre-Bid meeting will be rejected. PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk, City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. They can also be found at www.dir.ca.qov/ under the "Statistics and Research" Tab. The Contracting Agency also Resolution No. - Page 1 of 4 P95 shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. • Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than two hundred dollars ($200.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor Resolution No. - Page 2 of 4 P96 more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required •by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.1. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga.for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; including, but not limited to, a Class"C-33" (Painting Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date,-and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. • The work is to be done in accordance with the specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. In an effort to go green and paperless, digital copies of the plans, specifications, and bid proposal, including any future addenda or revisions to the bid documents, are available by going to www.ciplist.com and signing up, by going to Member Login or Member Signup (it's free), then choose California, then scroll down to San Bernardino County and click on Browse Cities, then scroll down to Rancho Cucamonga and click on City Projects, then click on the Project of interest under the Title and follow directions for download. Note, copies of the plans, specifications, bid proposal, addendums and revisions will not be provided, digital copies must be downloaded from the above website then printed. Prospective bidders must register for an account on www.ciplist.com to be included on the prospective bidder's list(s) and to receive email updates of any addenda or revisions to the bid documents. Be advised that the information contained on this site may change over time and without notice to prospective bidders or registered users. While effort is made to keep information current and accurate and to notify registered prospective bidders of any changes to the bid documents, it is the responsibility of each prospective bidder to register with www.ciplist.com and to check this website on a DAILY basis through the close of bids for any applicable addenda or updates. Resolution No. - Page 3 of 4 P97 No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to registered prospective bidders from www.ciplist.com. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, reserves the right to reject any or all bids. Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for the "PARKS PAINTING PROJECT" may be directed to: Christopher Gilli or Kenneth Fung Parks Supervisor Assistant Engineer 8794 Lion St. 8794 Lion St. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 477-2730, ext. 4119 (909) 477-2730 ext. 4139 (e-mail at Christopher.Gilli@cityofrc.us) (e-mail at Kenneth.Funq(a.cityofrc.us) All questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids must be in writing (e-mail is acceptable) and received by the City no later than 5:00 pm on Thursday, October 16, 2014. The City is not responsible for questions undeliverable. ADVERTISE ON: September 23, 2014 and September 30, 2014 Resolution No. - Page 4 of 4 P98 STAFF REPORT saust ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT LJ Date: September 17, 2014 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: . Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Trina Valdez, Management Analyst I Subject: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO DECLINE ESTABLISHING A PROCUREMENT TARGET FOR ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY RECOMMENDATION Approval of a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approving to decline establishing a procurement target for Energy Storage Systems for the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On February 15, 2012, the City Council directed staff to determine if establishing procurement targets for Energy Storage Systems was appropriate for the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (RCMU) as a requirement of Assembly Bill (AB) 2514 (Skinner). AB 2514 was signed into law in 2010 requiring that on or before March 1, 2012, the governing board of a local publicly owned utility initiate a process to determine appropriate targets, if any, for the utility to procure viable and cost-effective energy storage systems to be achieved by December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2021. AB 2514 also requires that the governing board adopt any procurement targets for energy storage systems, if it is determined to be appropriate and cost effective, by October 1, 2014, and report this information to the California Energy Commission. Energy storage systems are devices that store energy for a period of time. An efficient energy storage system is determined by the amount of energy the system can store and the ability to be deployed at a specific time that will reduce peak load. The location of the storage system must be within range of a location that will benefit from a reduction in load and provide consistent reduction to deliver long term savings to the utility. In our analysis, staff reviewed common energy storage systems currently available, which includes thermal, battery, and hydroelectric storage. Thermal Energy Storage Thermal energy storage allows excess thermal energy to be collected for later use depending on the specific technology. Common thermal energy storage options are solar energy storage and ice-based technology. Ice thermal energy storage freezes water into ice at night during off-peak hours then uses the ice to cool a structure during the day to reduce the electricity needed for air conditioning demand during on-peak hours. In February 2012, staff reviewed the RCMU area to find potential sites to install ice thermal energy storage units as a pilot project. Staff found that the space needed to accommodate the size of the thermal energy storage unit was not feasible for most existing RCMU customers. The majority of customers are located within multi-unit buildings resulting in limited ground space or restricted roof space. Two energy storage units were installed in December 2012 and overall, the P99 City Council Staff Report - Decline Establishing a Procurement Target for Energy Storage Systems September 17, 2014 Page 2 units have provided some load reduction during peak energy hours. Based on this experience and a review of other utility programs, staff has determined that thermal energy storage systems may be cost-effective from the individual customer's perspective. However, the benefit of these thermal energy units to RCMU as a whole (primarily through peak load reduction) is not sufficient to justify providing utility incentives for these projects at this time. RCMU will continue to encourage customers to implement load-shifting technologies, such as thermal energy storage, and will reevaluate whether an incentive may be justified in the future. Battery Energy Storage Battery storage systems are generally used with a renewable energy source such as a wind or solar photovoltaic system and are charged during periods of low demand to be used to level the load during peak times. Traditional batteries are expensive, have high maintenance costs and limited lifespan due to crystals that form inside the cells during the charge and discharge cycles. The crystals can grow large enough inside the battery to cause the battery to bulge and short out requiring replacement. Newer technology has been developed using liquid metals inside the battery to reduce the chemical crystals and to increase the efficiency, but at a higher cost than traditional batteries. Research found that utilizing a battery to store and retrieve energy to reduce load is usually not that cost effective due to the high capital and maintenance costs. RCMU is continuing to evaluate battery storage options and looking into grant funding to do more research. Hydroelectric Energy Storage Hydroelectric energy storage uses the gravitational force of falling or flowing water to produce electrical power for storage. The cost of hydroelectricity and hydroelectric energy storage is relatively low but requires close proximity to a water source which does not make it a viable option for RCMU. Staff has concluded that the available options of energy storage systems are currently not cost effective or does not meet the needs of the utility. RCMU is recommending at this time that the City Council decline to establish a procurement target for energy storage. The City's decision to decline establishing a procurement target must be reevaluated at least once every three years and be reported to the California Energy Commission. RCMU will continue to review new energy storage technology to see if establishing a procurement target in the future would be appropriate and will return to City Council by October 1, 2017. Respectfully submitted, M er Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS:TV P100 RESOLUTION NO. 14-168 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING TO DECLINE ESTABLISHING A PROCUREMENT TARGET FOR ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY WHEREAS, the State of California established Assembly Bill (AB) 2514 requiring that the governing board of a local publicly owned utility initiate a process to determine appropriate targets, if any, for the utility to procure viable and cost effective energy storage systems to be achieved by December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2021; and WHEREAS, AB 2514 also requires that the governing board adopt any procurement targets for energy storage systems, if it is determined to be appropriate and cost effective, by October 1, 2014 and report this information to the California Energy Commission; and WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility is a publicly owned utility in the State of California and is therefore subject to AB 2514 and reporting requirements; and WHEREAS, based on information and factors analyzed by the City, the City has concluded that the available options of energy storage systems are currently not cost effective and do not meet the needs of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. The City has determined to decline establishing a procurement target for energy storage; and WHEREAS, AB 2514 requires the City to reevaluate this determination at least once every three years and report to the California Energy Commission; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City decline establishing a procurement target for energy storage pursuant to AB 2514 due to the lack of cost-effective energy storage options; and SECTION 2. The City reevaluate the decision to decline establishing a procurement target for energy storage, at least once every three years and report the findings to the California Energy Commission; and SECTION 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. Resolution No. 14-168 Page 1 of 1 P101 STAFFREPORT $4,ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT . LT Date: September 17, 2014 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Carlo Cambare, Engineering Technician Subject: A REQUEST TO VACATE A PORTION OF THE NORTH SIDE OF 24TH STREET LOCATED WEST OF HAVEN AVENUE AND SOUTH OF ARROW ROUTE —APNS 209-122-19, -18 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt and authorize the recording of the attached resolution summarily ordering the vacation of excess rights-of-way on the north side of 24th Street, generally located west of Haven Avenue and south of Arrow Route. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS It was determined that there is ten feet of excess right-of-way on the north side of 24th Street. The existing right-of-way was dedicated under the North Cucamonga Township Map generally located west of Haven Avenue and south of Arrow Route. Once vacated, said excess right-of-way will be part of lots 22 and 24 of Block 58 of the North Cucamonga Township. On August 13, 2014, Planning Commission Staff made the finding through minute action that the proposed vacation is in conformance with the General Plan. The vacation is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code because the existing 80-foot rights-of-way exceed of the City's current requirements for Local Streets (60 feet), so the excess street right-of-way is not required for street, highways and related purposes. Respec I submitted, Mark A. Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS:CC/mo Attachment(s) • P102 VICINITY MAP V-225 1 , I cu '� . ' ') y {441 ,, r cc, 25th St 25tht cu i � z , r i- .f Q , . _ 3 ,..,— —• ,,. cgr , .dp . . ,,.. gips am , ... 4.-• nr, R b . + V •, „� . di fr 11 i 1 -.41 ., 1 ,. 8v9 dR a 1 OM ttt y f �4 OSP ash f.-. so. ' «i 24th St 'r 24th a ,- 24th St c Q ,,,i,l - ,+ air MN ■ P103 RESOLUTION NO. 14-169 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF EXCESS RIGHTS-OF-WAY INCLUDING A 10-FOOT WIDTH ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 24TH (V-225) -APN 209-122-19, and 209-122-18 WHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1 , Section 8334, of the Streets and Highway Code, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to summarily vacate those portions of the City Streets hereinafter more particularly described; and WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission on August 13 , 2014, by minute action found and determined that the summary vacation of the subject rights-of-way herein contemplated conform to the City's General Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council found all the evidence submitted that the subject rights-of- way located on north side of 24th Street are unnecessary for present or prospective public street purposes NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby makes its order vacating the excess street rights-of-way, as shown on map V-225, on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which have been further described in the legal description which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B" and by reference made a part thereof. SECTION 2: That the subject vacation shall be subject to the reservations and exceptions, if any, for existing utilities on record. SECTION 3: That from and after the date the resolution is recorded, said excess street rights-of-way no longer constitute a street or public easement. SECTION 4: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. SECTION 5: That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution, and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force. Resolution No. 14-169 Page 1 of 1 P104 STAFF REPORT stir ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT L i Date: September 17, 2014 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Carlo Cambare, Engineering Technician Subject: A REQUEST TO VACATE A PORTION OF THE SOUTH SIDE OF 25TH STREET LOCATED WEST OF HAVEN AVENUE AND SOUTH OF ARROW ROUTE —APNS 209-104-02, -37 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt and authorize the recording of the attached resolution summarily ordering the vacation of excess rights-of-way on the south side of 25th Street, generally located west of Haven Avenue and south of Arrow Route. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS It was determined that there is ten feet of excess right-of-way on the south side of 25th Street. The existing right-of-way was dedicated under the North Cucamonga Township Map generally located west of Haven Avenue and south of Arrow Route. Once vacated, said excess right-of-way will be part of lots 27 and 29 of Block 59 of the North Cucamonga Township. On August 13, 2014, Planning Commission Staff made the finding through minute action that the proposed vacation is in conformance with the General Plan. The vacation is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code because the existing 80-foot rights-of-way exceed of the City's current requirements for Local Streets (60 feet), so the excess street right-of-way is not required for street, highways and related purposes. Respectfully submitted, Mark . uer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS:CC/mo Attachment(s) 0 P105 VICINITY MAP V-224 0 I I i aa -1,---\... . - ir alp .... . , ,,,,, . i . ... 1 ,--ir 1 _. air - . i .., i 1. if ■ r 1 !Ihr • ir ill awillill ,--- - isouirminm.4-Zroar.- ,2siligntZ.------ 1 i St MI i ' `1 j ,, I 1 .. a) .,i fir . a i74.0 AI. IP I� ♦ ':' L-irer . P •` -. ' :lb g cu i ,e, , is 0• Gx)° AP AID PAD 1 r i4 ' AP 1 , i .. •41 Y 4 Ai' ..--"11 ' ' '.' ' h St ra lir ' ire- -leir- 1-11-1"—m-111Ir J 1 P106 RESOLUTION NO. 14-170 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF EXCESS RIGHTS-OF-WAY INCLUDING A 10-FOOT WIDTH ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 25TH (V-224) - APN 209-104-02, and 209-104-37 WHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1 , Section 8334, of the Streets and Highway Code, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to summarily vacate those portions of the City Streets hereinafter more particularly described; and WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission on August 13, 2014, by minute action found and determined that the summary vacation of the subject rights-of-way herein contemplated conform to the City's General Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council found all the evidence submitted that the subject rights-of- way located on south side of 25th Street are unnecessary for present or prospective public street purposes NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby makes its order vacating the excess street rights-of-way, as shown on map V-224, on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which have been further described in the legal description which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B" and by reference made a part thereof. SECTION 2: That the subject vacation shall be subject to the reservations and exceptions, if any, for existing utilities on record. SECTION 3: That from and after the date the resolution is recorded, said excess street rights-of-way no longer constitute a street or public easement. SECTION 4: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. SECTION 5: That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution, and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force. Resolution No. 14-170 Page 1 of 1 � P107 STAFF REPORT L ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: September 17, 2014 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Jerry A. Dyer, Principal Civil Enginee Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer L Subject: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND NO. 7635157 IN THE AMOUNT OF $48,477.32, FOR THE FY 2012/2013 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION — OVERLAY OF VARIOUS STREETS PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 13-093 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. 7635157 in the amount of $48,477.32, for the FY 2012/2013 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation — Overlay of Various Streets project, Contract No. 13-093. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Contractor: Laird Construction Co. Inc. 9460 Lucas Ranch Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-5797 Respectfully submitted, Mark A. Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/JAD/SH:Is P108 MAP-4 MAP-3 MAP-2 NI DST w Li > > w a HIDDEN FARM / a a H/LLSID f / J a w CHANNeC I w -J > E VISTA GROVE w a ,, 1E RD. = w a 1- HILLSIDE RD. pi NA 2 ›- / U a ce w z w WILSON AVE a f a��'� / �PG''G.'As / 4 w 14111 I BAYAN ST. BANYAN ST. a e v .� z a MAP-5 f J ■N AVE. a w N z i LEMON AVE z 1--a w I J a ND AVE. z HIGHLAND ce t HIGHLAND AVE. ® qtsLIFZ,4 ticSe i ®(210.1 I th ST. < /0/"., �Q VICTORIA 19th ST. Li vi 4Y VICTORY >> > a MONTE VISTA ST, MONTE VISTA ST. y MAP- 1 I a a ° 4� DC- J 4 W J CO a__ w I —__ — FR' 0 / 2 ce V co J / / a BASELINE AVE BASE LINE w / 4 Li PKWY o /�SP > a ,tS L >- /Q E�RP W w / S CHURCH ST. > J J W OR 1:9 / MAP-9 > L a = 0. / = fg LL SAN BERNARDINO RD f / Z N �j FOOTHILL " FOOTHILL BLVD. W cu' et Li : > a V 6 D ON a Lj GI > ¢ w LIVIC a w vi > CENTER DR > 1 ARROW ROUTE > a ARROW RTE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA s ,1 DIM FY 2012/2013 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION ��\`�J �I•�M OVERLAY NA''S. P109 $1.7e9� STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: September 17, 2014 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of EngineeringS����ervices/City Engineer By: Jerry A. Dyer, Principal Civil Engineer Subject: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE MEASURE "I" FIVE YEAR CAPITAL PROJECT NEEDS ANALYSIS FOR FISCAL YEARS 2015/2016 THROUGH 2019/2020 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Measure "I" Five- Year Capital Project Needs Analysis covering fiscal years 2015/2016 through 2019/2020 as requested by SANBAG to provide a public record of the intended use of the Measure "I"Valley Major Street and Freeway Interchange Program Revenue. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Measure "I" 2010-2040, the county-wide transportation sales tax program approved by voters in November 2004 and the Strategic Plan, requires that each local jurisdiction receiving revenues from the Valley Major Street and Freeway Interchange Programs to annually adopt and update a Five- Year Capital Project Needs Analysis which outlines the specific projects upon which those funds shall be expended. Staff has prepared the attached Five-Year Capital Project Needs Analysis schedule to be adopted by City Council and kept on file with the San Bernardino Associated Governments for informational purposes. Respectfully submitted, Mark A. uer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/JAD:Is Attachment P119 / 0 ALMOND ST '. HILL. _. r k.... ❑0L1 711Wil AV E G O WILS / AVE WILSON AVE v. '-v`'1_ A.-.. 11111H 0 0 > < I, f 11 1 ,,,ANylow ,la imi ., ..... ,0, -...._ , 1 I t :I[el:ll_.Ri�7_l►j-rte. '. , ct 2 - _ a I O r.,,,-(> " o� U Z t _ {66 VICTORI• `�' , U c v m _i_ BASE _ ill ' Z > i • ... , . t '' Fr p, CHURCI ST z 113,�� A Few HILL BLVD, -. ¢ 11,11 iLVD :;-- r > m ill 0500 CI Q �tl ARROW -• ir • tu oZ m RR in .�� mgr NTS 8TH ST > MI 111 6TH 5T '' te n l t-2 0 ? _ 4TH ST ci; ONTARIO CITY LIMIT MAJOR STREET ARTERIAL PROGRAM Di WILSON AVE FROM EAST AVE TO WARDMAN BULLOCK RD O VICTORIA ST FROM ETIWANDA AVE TO ECL (I-15) O CARNELIAN ST AT BANYAN ST O GT11 ST AT UTICA AVE � 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Z���•���t MEASURE I FIVE—YEAR CPNA FY 2015/16 TO 2019/2020 �/ , % ' i PROJECT LOCATIONS P111 cq m § & co \ } a \ / I- X 0 r —4 LO 0 [ 0 e f = ) cm } r , an o CO cci LLI 0- 0 20 - ® - - ® / To— U {co k cu — z = \_ zo _ � � ) \ \ z / ) � \ \ Co co 2 2 \ \ , , el o a m : _ _ § / k k k Cu .c 0 0 < ! 0 Cu ■ 3 0 ] J.< — » ` - § \ > Cu J § \ ) - — / Z LLJ ƒ Cu \ _ Cl) = Cu co C ) _ ƒ ni wE § \ 2 } | \ 2R § Cu § To § _ i ƒ W _ : :aialh-CL) ƒ H ( a CD CO _ $ a > 0 £ f 0 ƒ C e z ) - , Co _ z z 0 f P112 I I I . , 1 1 1 1 1 $ 8 . I , I I w re cn N m to R H N D O LL r 69 to to to to to to 49 to 69 EAH4o4964 EAER9949EAEA43 0 0 I I I I I I I I . I 0 0 I , I en 0 N 0600) 0 m T- V co z Q EA EA EA ER ER 49 EA ER 49 09 69 09 49 49 49 69 ER 69 EA ER 49 EA T a O 1 1 . , 1 0 0. I . I I OD O ON) E E d ▪ L N E >s 4,094,64 E9 EA 49 EA Eft 69 EA 6969 ER ER 69 69 69 ER 4E 6949 I >1 I I I , I I I I I I I 1 1 I I $ O . . , . . O 1; o p c r o c S N. } L CZ c O -c t. 44 to EA EA ER ER EA ER EA ER 44 69 04 04 49 EA EA EA 44 EA 49 EA l0 E To . O I I I V . . I I 0 O I I I I co O O c CD co T CO S LO a r �p ch c TOf E Q } M - '2 O �0 lL Q• £ O �6 to to to 69 69 ER 49 ER 49 49 69 69 69 49 69 49 EA 69 EA 69 ER ER u C H CA a o 0 00 III Q $ , . I 0 $ . , I 00 • . . I I Q � Z a+• c• .0 CO e N r D >' cu 0 r M O M o � • N EA to 49 69.En ER ER(Al ER 49 69 69 .4-`N il O 6 $ 2 � O m $ $ I . . $ $ I S $ . 11 S . I . . I O at0 'p t & $ $ NN OO � o � y co V N Q co M 6) h S t0 N L� Q1 r N N 8 Q• r O OD D 7 EA 69 ER ER ER 69 EA 49 ER 69 EA EA EA 69 EA EA EA V969 ER ER 69 a a O 0 H W " 0 H W I ' 0 H W I I 0W I I I I _ O (i) W e -0 O (o W e O co W O (o W a Ci 8 Q > li li Oo < > I.L. li Lo Q > li ti ` Q > Li li li Li >' .. w 2w 2w 2w R c co 088 088Jai c 088L ti 08888m C.) o i5 .- M 15 15 2 tr2 5 d = o. 2 5 mL O2 5 m m 15 y a) c `► n o 49 n o c u) - w a) co co o - LL O LL d as cn UO d N O. t0 G C6 G 'C' O U UH UH — ° 0• GH 0 I • to ty c c i o. 6 0 c i •3 c Z c a d d - i 0. i IXL U0i F- t I— LA. I- L 1 t- 5 O x o 3 R 1 .. Q ... 0 H V 0 7 (/) • �j ++ .. m .. ++ N d :o E V o N N 0 rn� To E O` .. , QI O m Os O 2 0 O c c a�•w V o o r o O V -- o .O a ,2, m CO m . O U) ' A c 0 0 0 ,� O O n C > C 'p to 0 e0 ED t0 c 'p m c E Q e0 O m `. y o U " c a E a 1° E 2 1- m w � m 4 ,_0 - to E lac E 5cw z Q. .T: 3 to ' 49 F°- 40 � 1°- aw Ua o 0 P113 I . — 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 W cL 3 i- n LL EA ER EA EA EA EA EA ER ER EA 69 69 69 ER ER 69 ER ER E9 69 69 ER 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 11 I 1 1 I 1 0 N Q) Q co z Z Q EA to ER to to 69 ER 69 EA 69 69 EA 69 69 ER 09 ER E4 E9 ER 69 ER T Q I I I I I Q Q 1 I I I EA o cc CD CCD E Ea lL N c co a' EA 69 ER 69 EA ER ER 69 ER E9 E9 69 69 ER EA ER 69 69 ER ER EA ER- 9. d 1 1 1 1 1 >, L CO O 0 r C U r Co w } L C LL m o t :,I 69 to to E9 to to to EA ER EA 69 69 69 ER ER ER ER EA ER 69 EA EA To V 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I e T d r C Cl) ›+ a a 0 E !a ER ER EA EA ER EA ER EA EA EA 69 EA EA EA ER ER EA EA ER 69 ER ER B as a. 3 13 g 22 0 1 1 I 1 I $ $ I 1 N y C) 0 Q o 0 0 Z o y_ Z o) o o ° U o R < e lh C7 T N C A t N °n m LO L N CO EA EA H H ER EA EA 69 EA EA ER 69 69 ER EA VE<fl 69 fA EA to�'N ct 0.e� _d V 11 11 1 1 1 1 1 7 0 - 0 1a t N co U > Lo co CC 0 LL Lo O 0 r j , 0 0> N D d `° 2 C = ER 69 69 69 EA 69 69 EA ER EA 69 EA 69 EA EA EA ER 69 EA EA EA. c N01.- 1 ■ - W f— 1 O H 1 1 I O H W H 1 1 1 '- O cn C C C 0 «) W co C O C C C Cl)O W CO C C C Q L L L p Q > OQ N lN .N Q LL LL LL p Q > Q LL N L L C) C 4 — U 8 8 - ° O N w ( nvtVJ )C CO c ) w V) u) 5 p CO 0 n LL 1 1 N I yy co) . , 0 U H- U i- U i- N U F— wi a' co `.4 C a `0 C `.5 c Z E.4 c o t o co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 o Et d H LL d F- LL H LL U H LL a) Q C C N as CL) p R C �+ y (Ti Ea ; A 7 N C 3 2 N W t + .. 0 a .. a1 d N >m E E m U — U o E oJ0 „ a) 42 c) 2 ce „ .. N :? O C) m 1 o c ° do CO a I p _ � a C N U Y 2 ED O y EO O — o N 0 Co r r N 4) V 'C QC d N O 2 co d co O E C F W m 3 — M `+g — c E 3 o.M E .{ z [}L - 0 d > w '» H �r4a1. H ......111-7-: H v w U U P114 III W Ce I- I D LL (0,49.4:44o69- 4949494949 4343494349 43494949494949 I I I I I 0 N 25 0 r a z Z a 4949494943 9 to to 4fl to 4349494943 t9 t9 to to to 69 to T -a ici a E 6. IT2 eti 0) T 69 to tad"to t069t46969. to69to69to 69 t9Eo69toto49 T .0 d 1111 1 1 1 1 1 0 10A 1 1 1 1 1 T CO I N o a r w N O w w >- 8 g m C U N m O -a = 4096$969(e69 69t9696969 toto6969to 0,) - 0 g l0 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I i 1 1 T C7 N n a) ZS a N >. r c To c I- R Q• O _ 4349434943 4949494349 0,03.0.0-ea. 43494949494943 c w g a 3 .130 .00 ap Z al cn O m 'n m o °' o co• O' C11,-C11,-L N to to to to to 69 to t9 to 69 t9 to to 69 69 to to to t9 to to to, ,N o. E-- aCi� (� A .0 61 I i i I i I i I i i I I i I i 1 : N O `R > -o .c rx 9O u) 0 3LL in U > d N c N D '5 '5 0 69 to 69 to to 9 t9 to to to to to to to t9 t9 to 69 69 to 63. 0 O i_ I I i O H W ' I 0 1_ 1 1 1 0 1-" W I I I t L. O (1) '0 '0 .0 OW W '0D 0W -0 -0 -0 0 (!) W 'o •O a -0 } wQ litili ° a > i ii 40QI i i u°� Q > u_ u_ u_ u_ tTo co — 828 w ° 82 - 888 N ° 8 8 8 8 x ) o 0 gN 0U L - N N , - aN N N L 0 (1) N L to C WWW o ( WWV O lWVWO LL L O O e R L u 0 T 0 T 0 >. 0 > 0 DUH UH 01- HUH 0 _ _ N 21W 132 V W I 0 00 (0 O 0 0 0 0 00 = 1— 1 d H LL a H LL w H LL O H Il t co X y R Z m R NI- 3 u) N m Q S. .. d .. Q a.+ y 0 Q 0 CIO O W O OA 1n N O _ O 0 RI 0 o C7 .. w ' 0l p N p ,d p a ra co l0 E U 10 r' O Qs c.O 0 cp C00 0 0 " d � ... v aloe � irrrn E ate ES,rn a °7 N 5 7. 3 , r E a o E `� Z at"o1= l- 43 H w - 1,40 ou 0 1 P115 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I 1 w CC M I- LL 01.694969.69 6949494o69 6969696949 69694949694969 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 I I 1 1 0 N °r) a ca• z z 4949494949 6969696969 6969696969 (03 ,0‘064.69.6969„w. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I CO 7 a E , {rL C A 6969696964 6969646969 6964696969 696969M6940 69, N 1 1 1 1 1 T co O • T C V T N w } c IL to O L 'y,, 6464446969 6969696969 69696969449 696949,9696969 E 1 SS T V h co �' CV c TAE Q Nao '3 c Q4949494949 4949494949 4949494949 69 69 69 e4 449 69 6! v a IA I I I I 1 CO I I 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I^ N Z O & °' _ Z V V c Q c CO"C1) >. C 0) C aa)i V) O � C o a. Cat •7 Q °N° 1440369. 49 t»69 v>V3 4949494949 69 449 449 449 69 69 69 a"N C et e9 Q) 1 I I I I 1 I 1 1 1 I I I I I o (4O > v v=) Q 3u- V c w c N G 0 O'5 •c ES t4 E6 49449 449',694944969 494944969(49 (069696969-6900a c 1. O - N 0 1_ 1 1 1 O I w 1 1 0 H 1 1 1 0 F- w 1 1 1 .. 001510 -0 OW w vv oc' vvv O9w vvvv b O C C C O LL C C C C C C C LL c C C C c c > > > > Q LL LL LL yOj Q 7 LL LL ¢ LL LL LL 0 Q > LL L. LL LL - 888 .. - 088 .. � gVg — 0 -gtl . O o '5 2T61-67132 4492 mzL 13 )) me N2 lima) Dt LL c., 3 wwwO coo — Cntoco fn coCn (n - ,714. d V ,- Ia o N » ' 0 m a C')0O. a H UH H H c a 0WO O O W N r a O = MO = O o = 00 = E 0. 0. 1- U.. 0 H LL M LL _ U X I N r+ T( y ca C v to t0 c cn o csi 0 �eCg� a+ .. 00)) .. ++ a) ++ m C 0 0 a' O _ O 3o E °f r C) F2 o) _� 0 N m 1 t/) V d 0 CA 0 C C.) M $ , a C C O � O O N w A 14 0 , O O0 O N H 000 2 ' 8 E 040 E c I- _ 0` 0 = H w H n � 0 ,-7,- 0 0 P116 RESOLUTION NO. 14-171 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE MEASURE "I" FIVE YEAR CAPITAL PROJECT NEEDS ANALYSIS FOR FISCAL YEARS 2015/2016 THROUGH 2019/2020 WHEREAS, San Bernardino County voters approved passage of Measure "I" 2010-2040 in November 2004 authorizing San Bernardino Associated Governments, acting as the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority, to impose a one-half of one percent retail transactions and use tax applicable in the incorporated and unincorporated territory of the County of San Bernardino; and WHEREAS, revenue from the tax can only be used for transportation improvement and traffic management programs authorized in the Expenditure Plans set forth in Ordinance No. 04-1 of Authority; and WHEREAS, the Strategic Plan requires each local jurisdiction applying for revenue from the Valley Major Street and Freeway Interchange Programs to annually adopt and update a Five-Year Capital Project Needs Analysis. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, hereby adopts the Measure"I" Five-Year Capital Project Needs Analysis for Fiscal Years 2015/2016 through 2019/2020, a copy of which is attached to this resolution. Resolution No. 14-171 — Page 1 of 1 P117 .s� STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: September 17, 2014 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer Subject: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT 18870, LOCATED ABOUT 525 FEET EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, AT THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE, SUBMITTED BY LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, INC. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Final Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, Monumentation Cash Deposit and ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Tract 18870 and authorizing the Mayor to sign said agreement and authorizing the City Clerk to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18870, located about 525 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue, at the north side of Arrow Route, within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan (South Overlay), was approved by the Planning Commission on July 10, 2013. This project is for a residential subdivision into 291 single family lots and 11 lettered lots on 79.67 acres of land. The developer is submitting the final phase map Tract 18870 for the subdivision of 125 lots and 5 lettered lots. The Developer, Lennar Homes of California, Inc., is submitting an Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit to guarantee the construction of the public improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond $ 897,500.00 Labor and Material Bond $ 897,500.00 Monumentation Cash Deposit $ 9,563.00 Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's Office. Respe bmitted, M Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/ V:Is Attachment P118 City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division 1 1 w tl FOOTHILL BOULEVARD . 1• 111111111111Iii . 11110111 SEVA NE SAN w IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIU VILLAS IIW111� z ,�._ ir It 0j o TRACT 18870 ? T el _ a. e Q Zkr s,r •G AY 'vr a' Z Y 4 x r-"aa, ,,x s 571ST ARROW ROUTE w z Z > Q Q . II Item: TR /88 70 Title: V/CIN/T Y MAP P119 RESOLUTION NO. 14-172 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE FINAL MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR TRACT 18870 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map 18870, submitted by Lennar Homes of California, Inc. and consisting of a subdivision of 79.67 acres of land into 291 single family lots and 11 lettered lots, located about 525 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue, at the north side of Arrow Route was approved by the Planning Commission on July 10, 2013; and WHEREAS, Tract Map 18870 is the final phase map of the division of land approved as shown on the Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, all the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the installation of public street improvements by the City Council of said City have now been met by posting the Improvement Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit by Lennar Homes of California, Inc., as developer; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and that said Tract Map 18870 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. Resolution No. 14-172 — Page 1 of 1 P120 RESOLUTION NO. 14-173 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY) FOR TRACT MAP 18870 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the"Act", said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D")establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; Resolution No. 14-173— Page 1 P121 (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Resolution No. 14-173— Page 2 P122 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION The legal description of the Property is: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, THENCE SOUTH 00° 30' 15"WEST 650.11 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89°23' 35" WEST OF 1071.37 FEET; THENCE NORTH 21° 16' 02" EAST 646.6 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°23' 35" WEST 269.40 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 21° 16' 02" WEST 2758.36 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89° 23' 40" EAST 2089.40; THENCE NORTH 00° 30' 15" EAST 1959.80 FEET, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT THEREFORM ALL OIL, GAS AND OTHER HYDROCARBON AND MINERAL SUBSTANCES (EXCEPT WATER) LYING NOT LESS THAN 100 FEET BELOW THE SURFACE OF SAID REAL PROPERTY, AS EXCEPTED AND RESERVED IN THE DEED FROM SANTA FE LAND IMPROVEMENT COMPANY, A CORPORATION, TO OLIVER A. JOHNSON AND CRYSTAL M. JOHNSON, HUSBAND AND WIFE, AS JOINT TENTANTS, RECORDED JUNE 7, 1946 IN BOOK 1890 PAGE 491 OFFICIAL RECORDS, WHICH DEED RECITES: "PROVIDED, THAT THE FIRST PARTY, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, SHALL NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO ENTER UPON THE SURFACE OF SAID REAL PROPERTY FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXTRACTING AND REMOVING ANY SUCH RESERVED SUBSTANCES, OR FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE." Assessor's Parcels Numbers of the Property: APN 229-041-09 Resolution No. 14-173— Page 3 P123 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2014/2015 Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City): Landscape Maintenance District No. 1(General City) (the "Maintenance District") represents various landscaped areas, parks and community trails located at various sites throughout the City. These sites consist of several non-contiguous areas throughout the City. As such, the parcels within this District do not represent a distinct district area as do the other LMD's within the City. Typically new parcels within this District have been annexed upon development. The various sites maintained by the District consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees, entry monuments, community trails and parks. The parks consist of Bear Gulch Park, East and West Beryl Park, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park, Heritage Community Park, Hermosa Park, Red Hill Community Park, Lions Park, Napa Park, Don Tiburcio Tapia Park and the Rancho Cucamonga Adult Sports Complex). Proposed additions to the Improvements for Project TRACT MAP 18870: Street Trees 0 EA Resolution No. 14-173— Page 4 P124 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2014/2015 The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) for TRACT MAP 18870: EDU Rate per Land Use Basis Factor* EDU* Single Family Parcel 1.00 $92.21 Multi-Family Unit 0.50 92.21 Non-Residential Improved Acre 2.00 92.21 Vacant Acre 0.25 92.21 *EBU means Equivalent Benefit Unit. The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 125 Parcels x 1 EBU Factor x $ 92.21 Rate per EBU = $ 11,526.25 Annual Assessment Resolution No. 14-173 — Page 5 P125 RESOLUTION NO. 14-174 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) FOR TRACT MAP 18870 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the"Act", said special maintenance district known and designated as Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) . (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D")establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; Resolution No. 14-174 — Page 1 P126 (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Resolution No. 14-174 — Page 2 P127 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION The legal description of the Property is: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, THENCE SOUTH 00°30' 15"WEST 650.11 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89°23' 35" WEST OF 1071.37 FEET; THENCE NORTH 21° 16' 02" EAST 646.6 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°23' 35" WEST 269.40 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 21° 16' 02" WEST 2758.36 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89° 23' 40" EAST 2089.40; THENCE NORTH 00° 30' 15" EAST 1959.80 FEET, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT THEREFORM ALL OIL, GAS AND OTHER HYDROCARBON AND MINERAL SUBSTANCES (EXCEPT WATER) LYING NOT LESS THAN 100 FEET BELOW THE SURFACE OF SAID REAL PROPERTY, AS EXCEPTED AND RESERVED IN THE DEED FROM SANTA FE LAND IMPROVEMENT COMPANY, A CORPORATION, TO OLIVER A. JOHNSON AND CRYSTAL M. JOHNSON, HUSBAND AND WIFE, AS JOINT TENTANTS, RECORDED JUNE 7, 1946 IN BOOK 1890 PAGE 491 OFFICIAL RECORDS, WHICH DEED RECITES: "PROVIDED, THAT THE FIRST PARTY, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, SHALL NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO ENTER UPON THE SURFACE OF SAID REAL PROPERTY FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXTRACTING AND REMOVING ANY SUCH RESERVED SUBSTANCES, OR FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE." Assessor's Parcels Numbers of the Property: APN 229-041-09 Resolution No. 14-174 — Page 3 P128 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2014/2015 Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) (the "Maintenance District") is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the • City. These sites consist of several non-contiguous areas throughout the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. Proposed additions to the Improvements for Project TRACT MAP 18870: Existing 10 EACH STREET LIGHTS (Arrow Route) • • Resolution No. 14-174—Page 4 P129 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2014/2015 Street Light Maintenance District No.1 (Arterial Streets): The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No.1 (Arterial Streets) for TRACT MAP 18870: EBU Rate per Land Use Basis Factor* EBU* Single Family Parcel 1.00 $17.77 Multi-Family Parcel 1.00 17.77 Commercial Acre 2.00 17.77 Vacant Acre 2.00 17.77 *EBU means Equivalent Benefit Unit. The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 125 Parcels x 1 EDU Factor x $17.77 Rate Per EDU = $ 2,221.25 Annual Assessment • Resolution No. 14-174— Page 5 P130 RESOLUTION NO. 14-175 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (LOCAL STREETS) FOR TRACT MAP 18870 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Act", said special maintenance district known and designated as Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D")establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the `Territory") be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; Resolution No. 14-175 — Page 1 P131 (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. Resolution No. 14-175— Page 2 • P132 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION The legal description of the Property is: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, THENCE SOUTH 00° 30' 15"WEST 650.11 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89°23' 35" WEST OF 1071.37 FEET; THENCE NORTH 21° 16' 02" EAST 646.6 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°23' 35" WEST 269.40 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 21° 16' 02" WEST 2758.36 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89° 23' 40" EAST 2089.40; THENCE NORTH 00° 30' 15" EAST 1959.80 FEET, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT THEREFORM ALL OIL, GAS AND OTHER HYDROCARBON AND MINERAL SUBSTANCES (EXCEPT WATER) LYING NOT LESS THAN 100 FEET BELOW THE SURFACE OF SAID REAL PROPERTY, AS EXCEPTED AND RESERVED IN THE DEED FROM SANTA FE LAND IMPROVEMENT COMPANY, A CORPORATION, TO OLIVER A. JOHNSON AND CRYSTAL M. JOHNSON, HUSBAND AND WIFE, AS JOINT TENTANTS, RECORDED JUNE 7, 1946 IN BOOK 1890 PAGE 491 OFFICIAL RECORDS, WHICH DEED RECITES: "PROVIDED, THAT THE FIRST PARTY, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, SHALL NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO ENTER UPON THE SURFACE OF SAID REAL PROPERTY FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXTRACTING AND REMOVING ANY SUCH RESERVED SUBSTANCES, OR FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE." Assessor's Parcels Numbers of the Property: APN 229-041-09 Resolution No. 14-175 — Page 3 P133 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2014/2015 Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets): Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) (the "Maintenance District") is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in another local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses the residential area of the City west of Haven Avenue. The sites maintained by the District consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets generally west of Haven Avenue. Proposed additions to the Improvements for Project TRACT MAP 18870: Street Lights 0 EA • Resolution No. 14-175 — Page 4 P134 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2014/2015 Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets): The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) for TRACT MAP 18870: EBU Rate per Land Use Basis Factor* EBU* Single Family Parcel 1.00 $39.97 Multi-Family Unit 1.00 39.97 Commercial Acre 2.00 39.97 Vacant Acre 2.00 39.97 *EBU means Equivalent Benefit Unit. The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 125 Parcels x 1 EBU Factor x $ 39.97 Rate per EBU = $4,996.25 Annual Assessment Resolution No. 14-175 — Page 5 P135 STAFF REPORT , ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT le !irk 1 ill Date: September 17, 2014 r RANCHO To: Mayor and Members of the City Council CUCAMONGA John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Walter C. Stickney, Associate Engineer Subject: APPROVAL OF PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES AND TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE NOTICE INVITING BIDS FOR THE "DAY CREEK CHANNEL AND DEER CREEK CHANNEL BIKE TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS", TO BE FUNDED FROM FUNDS 214 (TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT)AND 198 (CITY-WIDE INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS) RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the plans and specifications for the Day Creek Channel and Deer Creek Channel Bike Trail Improvements, and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Staff is requesting authorization from the City Council to proceed to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids"for the Day Creek Channel and Deer Creek Channel Bike Trail Improvements. The City has received funding through two Transportation Development Act grants for adding pedestrian and bicycle trail improvements to the County's channel maintenance roads along Day Creek Channel (Base Line Road to Highland Avenue), and along Deer Creek Channel (Church Street to Base Line Road). These improvements will allow for pedestrian and bicycle travel from the City streets, and from the Pacific Electric Trail, to and along the County's channel maintenance roads. The trail improvements will consist of the repair of the Deer Creek Channel maintenance road pavement, the trail signing and striping of the maintenance roads, and the addition of pipe gates with ride-thru areas to prevent private cars from accessing the maintenance roads. The City has coordinated with the County on these improvements. The grants received require a local funding match, which will be made from the City-wide Infrastructure Improvements fund. These improvements will add two more significant segments of the City-wide trail network. Legal advertising is scheduled for September 18, 2014 and September 25, 2014, with a bid opening at 2:00 pm on Tuesday, September 30, 2014, unless extended by Addenda. Staff anticipates awarding a contract for construction no later than October of this year. Construction is expected to commence in November, with a 12-week construction period. oprokRespe •miffed, Mar -ler Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/WCS:Is I P136 HILLSIDE RD • ILL'•IDER II I 1 F- iflEllu■� ILSO WILSON AV LSO •V it Intsolitit 1 210 F 1PL 21 ifj1 .I�imia�i ��� / z • — 1 li zi z VCTORI•! _ e ______-_-H ■� =__ 3__> BASE LI I• �_ .�� '� w At ■E!Ijbi `I de r ,.% < ■'OTHI i'L7I•a �L'{�'�R'. - ii.c�f� _< ¢ W RT VAIkirea�I <O ilea 5 8�smai A ,s■' iWIw 6TH ST ___• ' ■■ WI PROJECT - 1_-_-- - j It --__ ___ I �IdE RD- I ,a• BASE LI j / I j ---i —_ Q_I_--- �)r __—jVICTDR1A PARK LN ii L>j 7 i4 // i_ -- I / iii j V'1/ I CHURCH ST -1 J-_____--- I I`\. , QC I I O i /IAi ACIFIC ELECTRId RAIL j B SE LINE RD '— i 1 Vicinity Map Day Creek Channel and Deer Creek Channel Bike Trail Improvements P137 RESOLUTION NO. 14-176 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "DAY CREEK CHANNEL AND DEER CREEK CHANNEL BIKE TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the "DAY CREEK CHANNEL AND DEER CREEK CHANNEL BIKE TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications,which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, September 30, 2014, sealed bids or proposals for the "DAY CREEK CHANNEL AND DEER CREEK CHANNEL BIKE TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided .for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of the "DAY CREEK CHANNEL AND DEER CREEK CHANNEL BIKE TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general Resolution No. 14-176 - Page 1 of 4 P138 prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk, City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. They can also be found at www.dir.ca.qov/ under the "Statistics and Research" Tab. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than two hundred dollars ($200.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Resolution No. 14-176— Page 2 of 4 P139 Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.1. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; including, but not limited to, a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Resolution No. 14-176 — Page 3 of 4 P140 Cucamonga, California. In an effort to go green and paperless, digital copies of the plans, specifications, and bid proposal, including any future addenda or revisions to the bid documents, are available by going to www.ciplist.com and signing up, by going to Member Login or Member Signup (it's free), then choose California, then scroll down to San Bernardino County and click on Browse Cities, then scroll down to Rancho Cucamonga and click on City Projects, then click on the Project of interest • under the Title and follow directions for download. Note, copies of the plans, specifications, bid proposal, addendums and revisions will not be provided, digital copies must be downloaded from • the above website then printed. Prospective bidders must register for an account on www.ciplist.com to be included on the prospective bidder's list(s) and to receive email updates of any addenda or revisions to the bid documents. Be advised that the information contained on this site may change over time and without notice to prospective bidders or registered users. While effort is made to keep information current and accurate and to notify registered prospective bidders of any changes to the bid documents, it is the responsibility of each prospective bidder to register with www.ciplist.com and to check this website on a DAILY basis through the close of bids for any applicable addenda or updates. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to registered prospective bidders from www.ciplist.com. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, reserves the right to reject any or all bids. Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for the"DAY CREEK CHANNEL AND DEER CREEK CHANNEL BIKE TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS" may be directed to: Walter C. Stickney Associate Engineer 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 477-2740, ext. 4076 (e-mail at walt.stickney©citvofrc.us) All questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids must be in writing (e-mail is acceptable) and received by the City no later than 5:00 pm on Monday, September 22, 2014. The City is not responsible for questions undeliverable. ADVERTISE ON: September 18, 2014, and September 25, 2014 Resolution No. 14-176 — Page 4 of 4 ,P140-1 MEMORANDUM 4 % CITY CLERIC'S OFFICE RANCHO Date: September 17, 2014 CUCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Fire Board Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Debra L. McNay, MMC Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director Subject: Approval of a Resolution Temporarily Changing the Time and Place of Fire District and City Council Meetings RECOMMENDATION It is recommended the Fire Board/City Council approve the attached Resolution temporarily changing the time and place of Fire Protection District and City Council meetings. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On tonight's Consent Agenda is Item M8 approving the contract for renovation of the City Council Chambers. Beginning September 19, 2014 the Public Works Services Department will start the process of removing, replacing and updating the existing council chamber live broadcast, - audio/video systems and all related control and electrical systems. The current system dates back to • when the Council Chambers was constructed, over 20 years ago, is antiquated, failing and in need of immediate replacement. As a result of the construction activities, the Chambers will be unavailable for regular City Council meetings until after the project is completed. Consequently, arrangements have been made to hold the two meetings in October, and the first meeting in November, at the Cucamonga Valley Water District offices and Board Chambers A Resolution has been prepared to temporarily change the time and place of the Fire Protection District and City Council meetings in order to hold these meetings at the Cucamonga Valley Water District during the duration of this project. Respectfully submitted, 2 24 V D ra L. McNay, MMC Assi tant City Clerk/Records Manager 't P140-2 RESOLUTION NO. 14-180 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, DETERMINING THE DAYS, TIME AND PLACE OF TEMPORARY REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: Temporary Regular Meetings of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council shall be held in the Cucamonga Valley Water District Office located at 10400 Ashford Street, Rancho Cucamonga, California, on Wednesday, October 1, 2014, Wednesday, October 15, 2014 and Wednesday, November 5, 2014. Each temporary regular meeting shall commence at 5:30 p.m. in the Lunch Room at the District Office for purposes of conducting an Executive Session only. The remainder of each such meeting shall commence and be conducted at 7:00 p.m. in the Board Room at the District Office. Please see the following page for formal adoption,certification and signatures • Resolution No. 14-180 P140-3 Page 2 of 2 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 17'h day of September, 2014. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the Rancho Cucamonga City Council at a Regular Meeting held on the 17TH day of September, 2014. Executed this 18th day of September, 2014, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary P140-4 STAFF REPORT PUBIC WORKS SERVICES DEPARTMENT tat Date: September 17, 2014 `a� To: Mayor and Members of the City Council RANCHO President and Members of the Board of Directors CUCAMONGA John R. Gillison, City Manager From: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director' Mike Costello, Fire Chief By: Ty Quaintance, Facilities Superintendent Ken Fung, Assistant Engineer Ruth Cain, Acting Senior Buyer Subject: ACCEPT THE PROPOSALS RECEIVED, AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF A CONTRACT IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $270,000 FOR THE "CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEDIA SYSTEMS REVITALIZATION" PROJECT IN ACCORDANCE WITH RFP #14/15-101,TO SPINITAR OF LA MIRADA AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 20% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $54,000 TO BE FUNDED FROM 1025001-5602 (CITY • CAPITAL OUTLAY-BUILDING AND IMPROVEMENTS - $270,000) AND 3288501-5602 (FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT CAPITAL OUTLAY-BUILDING AND IMPROVEMENTS- $54,000); AND APPROVE AN APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $270,000 FROM THE CITY CAPITAL RESERVE ACCOUNT FUND (025) INTO ACCOUNT 1025001-5602 AND APPROVE AN APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $54,000 FROM THE FIRE DISTRICT CAPITAL RESERVES ACCOUNT FUND (288) INTO ACCOUNT 3288501-5602 • RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the proposals received, award and authorize the execution of a contract in an amount not to exceed $270,000 for the "City Council Chambers Media Systems Revitalization" project in accordance with RFP #14/15-101 to Spinitar of La Mirada and authorize the expenditure of a 20% contingency in the amount of $54,000 to be funded from 1025001-5602 (City Capital Outlay-Building and Improvements - $270,000) and 3288501-5602 (Fire Protection District Capital Outlay- Building and Improvements - $54,000); and approve an appropriation in the amount of $270,000 from the City Capital Reserve (025) account fund balance into account 1025001-5602 and approve an appropriation in the amount of $54,000 from the Fire District Capital Reserves (288) account fund balance into account 3288501-5602. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS This project was identified as a council goal (A37) during the FY 13/14 City Council Goal Setting Session. The current system is antiquated and in need of replacement. A number of components within the existing system were originally installed when the council chambers was built and have far exceeded their life expectancy. In fact, the lighting control and audio system are no longer supported and replacement parts are not available. Several of the components have been hard wired and control for that portion of the system is no longer possible. When any one or a combination of these systems fail, our ability to provide live broadcast services or to provide audio, video and lighting within the Council Chambers will no longer be possible. A majority of the existing system is still utilizing analog technology and is not compatible with the digital technology being used today. Once this project is complete, the backbone infrastructure and system components will be much more reliable and should provide a better experience for the live audience, home viewers, council members and city staff. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT P140-5 RE:AWARD OF CONTRACT TO SPINITAR FOR THE"CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEDIA SYSTEMS REVITALIZATION"PROJECT SEPTEMBER 17,2014 PAGE 2 Phase one of the "City Council Chambers Media Systems Revitalization" project will include the following highlights: • Relocating the public speaker podium and incorporation of ADA accessibility in the new design • New camera lighting for the dais (softer light with less heat) • New lighting control system for the room • New microphones • New audio and video monitors on the dais for the Council members • Four new flat panel monitors for the audience in the council chamber • New speakers in the audience portion of the council chamber • All new cable and wiring • Replacement of all live broadcast audio/video mixing and production equipment(except the cameras) • Elimination of the current projector and glass panel Beginning September 18, 2014 Public Works staff and Spinitar will start the process of updating and improving the existing council chamber live broadcast and audio/video systems. This work will continue through November 21, 2014. As a result, the live broadcast system will not be available and all City Council meetings during this time will be held at the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) Board room located at 10440 Ashford Street, where all meetings will be recorded and re-broadcast on channel 3. Public Works staff provided detailed specifications for the "City Council Chambers Media Systems Revitalization" project to the Purchasing Division. Purchasing prepared and posted formal RFP #14/15-101 to the City's automated procurement system. As a result, there were two hundred twelve (212) vendors notified, nineteen (19) prospective vendors that viewed or downloaded the RFP documentation, and two (2) responses were received and evaluated. An Evaluation Committee consisting of staff from Public Works, City Clerk's office, Information Systems and Purchasing conducted a thorough analysis of the RFP responses, scored and ranked them. The consolidated scores resulted in Spinitar, of La Mirada, as the finalist. Therefore, staff is recommending an award to Spinitar in accordance with the specifications published in RFP #14/15-101. All applicable documentation is on file in the City's electronic procurement system and can be located through the City's website. Respectfully submitted, William Wittkopf Mike Costello Public Works Services Director Fire Chief WW:TQ/jau P141 STAFF REPORT ` ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT 1-11-0 Date: September 17, 2014 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Linda Ceballos, Environmental Programs Manager Subject: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE A RESOLUTION SETTING RATES FOR RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL REFUSE AND RECYCLING COLLECTION WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • RECOMMENDATION Approval of a resolution setting rates for residential and commercial/industrial refuse and recycling collection within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City of Rancho Cucamonga's (City) franchised waste hauler, Burrtec Waste Industries (Burrtec) submitted a written request for an adjustment to the residential and commercial/industrial refuse and recycling collection rates pursuant to the agreement between the City and Burrtec. The proposed rate increase includes an adjustment for the Consumer Price Index increase to the service component, a pass through of any disposal/processing costs, and an adjustment in City fees based on the overall adjusted rate. It has been three years since an increase to both the residential and commercial/industrial rates has occurred. Staff examined the rates of 15 communities. Both the overall rate, as well as the individual rate components, (disposal/processing costs, hauler operational cost, and City fees) were reviewed and compared. The City's residential rate is among the lowest of the jurisdictions surveyed. Additionally, the City's rate for seniors is the lowest of the jurisdictions surveyed that offer a senior rate. The proposed adjustment for residential barrel service, if approved, would increase the rate by $0.60 per • month. The current rate for residential barrel service is $21.88 per month and the proposed rate is $22.48 per month. This represents a 2.74% increase from the current rate. The proposed adjustment to the senior rate, if approved, would increase by $0.40 per month. Currently, the rate is $14.66 per month and the proposed rate is $15.06 per month. This represents a 2.74% increase from the current rate. The proposed adjustment for commercial/industrial refuse and recycling service, if approved, would result in an average increase of 5.1% for most commercial customers. The actual dollar amount increase will vary based on the bin size and pick-up frequency of each commercial customer. For example, the current rate for a commercial customer with one three-yard refuse bin and one three-yard recycling bin serviced one time per week is $147.38 per month, and the proposed rate is $154.62 per month. The Public Works Sub-Committee reviewed the proposed rate adjustments and rate surveys for residential and commercial/industrial refuse and recycling service on June 18, 2014, and recommended that staff proceed with scheduling the public hearing and provide the necessary notification per Proposition 218 requirements. The request to schedule a public hearing for September 17, 2014, was placed as an agenda P142 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT-CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE A RESOLUTION SETTING RATES September 17, 2014 Page 2 item on the July 2, 2014 City Council meeting, where it was approved. Staff then began the process to provide the necessary 45-day notification to the public per Proposition 218 requirements. A public hearing notice and proposed rate table were mailed to account holders and property owners by Burrtec on July 14, 2014. The public hearing was also advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on July 25, 2014. As of September 9, 2014, a total of four protest letters were received by the City Clerk and staff answered 84 calls from the community. The vast majority of the calls were from residents requesting information about how to apply for the senior rate (46 calls), or did not understand the reason for the notice (29 calls). If approved, the proposed rates would become effective January 1, 2015. Respectfull submitted, Mark A. S euer Director of Engineering Services/ City Engineer MS:Ic Attachments: Public Hearing Notice Proposed Rate Table • P143 VVV... Mayor L. DENNIS MICHAEL•Mayor Pro Tiny SAM SPAGNOLO Counril Mnnben WILLIAM J.ALEXANDER. MARC STEINORTH, DIANE WILLIAMS 1 Ciry mamas,Jour R.Gut unr L .., THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RANCHO CUCAMONGA Notice of Public Hearing —Refuse and Recycling Hauling Rates Notice is hereby given that a public hearing concerning revisions to residential and commercial refuse and recycling hauling rates has been scheduled for the 17th day of September, 2014, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The current and proposed rates are available for review in the Office of the City Clerk during regular business hours: Monday through Thursday, from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. The proposed increases are based upon an adjustment for the Consumer Price Index increase to the service component, a pass through of any disposal/processing costs, and an adjustment in City fees based on the overall adjusted rate. At the public hearing, the City Council shall consider all protests against the proposed rates. Written protests must be received in the City Clerk's office no later than 6:00 p.m., September 16, 2014. Further information may be obtained by contacting the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California at 909-477-2740. Dated: 7/I/2lll V - • 10500 Civic Center Dr.•PO.Box 807•Rancho Cucamonga.CA 91729-0807•Tel(909)477-2700•Fax(909)477-2849•www.CityofRC.us S P144 EXHIBIT A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA PROPOSED REFUSE AND RECYCLING HAULING RATES ALL RATES ARE BILLED MONTHLY UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED Current Proposed Current Proposed Rate Rate Rate Rate Residential Barrel Service Commercial Refuse/Trash 'Standard $ 21.88 $ 22.48 &Recycling Barrel Service •Senior $ 14.66 $ 15.06 Standard 1 $ 26.25 $ 27.03 Primary acct.holder 60 yrs.of age or older ore eligible 'Includes 1 barrel each for trash&recycling. to apply for Senior rote. Additional Recycling Barrel $ - $ 1.72 'Includes 1 barrel each for trash,recycling,&green waste. Commercial Refuse/Trash&Recycling Bin Service Additional Trash Barrel $ 6.81 $ 7.13 •Rate includes 1 trash&1 recycling bin of the same size Additional Recycling Barrel $ 1.37 $ 1.44 &service frequency. Additional Green Waste Barrel $ 3.54 $ 3.69 Bin Size Per Week Backyard Pull-Out Service $ 45.37 $ 47.94 1.5 yd 1 $ 106.53 $ 111.57 Multi-Family-Per Unit $ 20.88 $ 21.48 1.5 yd 2 $ 159.80 $ 167.57 Temporary Bins $ 98.94 $ 103.56 1.5 yd 3 $ 212.08 5 222.51 Temporary Bins-Extra Pick-Up $ 98.94 $ 103.56 2 yd 1 $ 120.43 $ 126.22 Bulky Items(in excess of4 collections/5 items per collection) 2 yd 2 $ 186.66 $ 195.87 Trip Charge $ 30.00 $ 30.00 2 yd 3 $ 253.17 $ 265.81 Per Item Charge $ 11.00 $ 11.00 3 yd 1 $ 147.38 $ 154.62 Residential customers are billed every 2 months. 3 yd 2 $ 232.30 $ 244.03 3 yd 3 $ 317,86 $ 334.11 Residential Single&Multi-Family Bin Service 3 yd 4 $ 403.00 $ 423.75 Rate includes 1 trash&1 recycling bin of the same size 3 yd 5 $ 488.13 $ 513.40 &service frequency. 3 yd 6 $ 573.87 $ 603.66 Bin Size Per Week 4 yd 1 $ 173.98 $ 182.62 3 yd 1 $142.37 $ 149.36 4 yd 2 $ 281.91 $ 296.33 3 yd 2 $229.80 $ 241.43 4 yd 3 $ 389.62 $ 409.80 3 yd 3 5 317.25 5 333.48 4 yd 4 5 497.27 $ 523.19 3 yd 4 $403.00 $ 403.00 4 yd 5 $ 604.89 $ 636.56 3 yd 5 $488.13 $ 488.13 4 yd 6 $ 712.78 $ 750.20 3 yd 6 $573.87 $ 573.87 6 yd 1 $ 212.34 $ 223.20 6yd 2 $ 364.46 $ 383.53 Green Waste Bin Service 6 yd 3 $ 516.58 $ 543.86 Size Per Week 6 yd 4 $ 668.97 $ 704.49 3 yd 1 $141.41 $ 143.94 6 yd 5 $ 821.08 $ 864.82 3 yd 2 $220.34 $ 222.69 6 yd 6 $ 973.14 $ 1,025.10 3 yd 3 $299.92 $ 302.13 3 yd 4 $379.10 $ 381.14 3 yd 5 $458.20 $ 460.07 Additional Recycling Bin Service 3 yd 6 $537.98 $ 539.72 Bin Size Per Week 3yd 1 $ 48.13 $ 48.13 Food Waste Bin Service 3 yd 2 $ 82.97 $ 82.97 Bin Size Per Week 3 yd 3 $ 109.90 $ 109.90 3 yd 1 $188.72 $ 193.05 3 yd 4 $ 138.04 $ 138.04 3 yd 2 $314.96 $ 320.91 3 yd 5 $ 165.41 $ 165.41 3 yd 3 $441.85 $ 449.44 3 yd 6 $ 193.76 $ 193.76 3 yd 4 5 568.34 $ 577.56 3 yd 5 5694.76 $ 705.58 Commercial Compactor Service 3 yd 6 $821.85 $ 834.33 Bin Size Per Week 3 yd 1 $ 245.54 $ 253.79 Refuse Roll-Off Service 3 yd 2 $ 397.45 $ 409.90 '10 Yard $539.81 $ 550.37 3 yd 3 $ 550.30 $ 566.97 •20 Yard $539.81 $ 550.37 3 yd 4 $ 702.51 $ 723.40 '40 Yard $539.81 $ 550.37 3 yd 5 $ 854.67 $ 879.74 '40 Yard Compactor $785.55 $ 798.19 3 yd 6 $ 1,007.82 $ 1,037.13 Rental Fee(per day after 7 days) $ 24.46 $ 24.46 4 yd 1 $ 293.83 $ 303.40 Relocation Fee $ 59.04 $ 61.62 4 yd 2 $ 488.19 $ 502.98 •Rallroffand compactor service rate is charged per service. 4 yd 3 $ 682.43 $ 702.45 4 yd 4 $ 876.56 $ 901.77 Recycling Roll-Off service 4 yd 5 $ 1,070.67 $ 1,101.09 '10 Yard-C&D $218.49 $ 228.03 4 yd 6 $ 1,264.91 $ 1,300.55 •40 Yard-C&D $171.20 $ 178.67 6 yd 1 $ 385.59 $ 397.54 '40 Yard-Recycling $171.20 $ 178.67 6 yd 2 $ 666.97 $ 686.27 '40 Yard-Recycling Compactor $171.20 $ 178.67 6 yd 3 $ 948.24 $ 974.95 '40 Yard-wood/Green Waste $171.20 $ 178.67 6 yd 4 $ 1,229.40 $ 1,263.47 Rental Fee(per day after 7 days) $ 24.46 $ 24.46 6 yd 5 $ 1,510.55 $ 1,552.00 Relocation Fee $ 59.04 $ 61.62 6 yd 6 $ 1,791.82 $ 1,840.65 •Rolloffservice rate is charged per service and subject to disposal and processing fees charged per ton. Push-Out Rates(oar container,per service frequency) 0-25 ft $ - $ - Additional Services 26-50 ft $ 38.07 $ 39.73 Extra Pick-Up)barrel) $ 19.45 $ 20.56 Over 50 ft. $ 76.14 $ 79.45 Extra Pick-Up(bin) $ 41.07 $ 43.39 Extra Pick-Up(compactor) $ 82.14 $ 86.79 Tilthopper Rental 5 37.83 $ 39.97 Bin Lock $ 10.81 $ 11.42 P145 RESOLUTION NO. 14-179 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA SETTING RATES FOR RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL REFUSE AND RECYCLING COLLECTION WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA A. Recitals. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has previously adopted Chapter 8.17 and Chapter 8.19 of Title 8 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code establishing Refuse Service Rules and Regulations and authorizing that the rates, fees and charges arising, directly or indirectly, under said legislation be adopted pursuant to resolution, and thereafter, be amended from time to time by resolution; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Sections 8.17.040 and 8.19.040, and agreements between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Burrtec Waste Industries ("Burrtec") for the collection, disposal, and processing of residential, commercial, and industrial refuse, recyclables, and green waste within the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Sections 8.17.040 and 8.19.040, and the agreements, Burrtec has requested a change in the rates to be charged for residential, commercial, and industrial collection services, and has provided the City with the financial, operational, and other information; and WHEREAS, based upon the amount of the rate changes requested and the information provided by Burrtec pursuant to Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Sections 8.17.040 and 8.19.040, the City Council has determined that such changes are justified and appropriate; and WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find and resolve as follows: Section 1. The facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A of this Resolution, are true and correct. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby approve the proposed monthly rates for refuse and recycling collection as follows: RESIDENTIAL RATES: Residential Barrel Service Standard $22.48 Additional Green Waste Barrel $3.69 Senior $15.06 Additional Recycling Barrel $1.44 Multi-Family-Per-Unit $21.48 Backyard Pull-Out Service $47.94 Additional Refuse/Trash Barrel $7.13 Additional Residential Services Temporary Bins $103.56 Resolution No. 14-179 — Page 1 • P146 Temporary Bins-Extra Pick-Up $103.56 Bulky Items: In excess of four collections/five items per collection Trip Charge $30.00 Per Item Charge $11.00 Residential Single and Multi-Family Bin Service *Rate includes one refuse bin and one recycling bin of the same size and service frequency. Bin Size 1X 2X 3X 4X 5X 6X 3 CY $149.36 $241.43 $333.48 $403.00 $488.13 $573.87 COMMERCIAL RATES: Commercial Barrel Service Standard $27.03 Additional Recycling Barrel $1.72 Commercial Refuse and Recycling Bin Service *Rate includes one refuse bin and one recycling bin of the same size and service frequency. Bin Size 1X 2X 3X 4X 5X 6X 1.5 CY $111.57 $167.57 $222.51 N/A N/A N/A 2 CY $126.22 $195.87 $265.81 N/A N/A N/A 3 CY $154.62 $244.03 $334.11 $423.75 $513.40 $603.66 4 CY $182.62 $296.33 $409.80 $523.19 $636.56 $750.20 6 CY $223.20 $383.53 $543.86 $704.49 $864.82 $1,025.10 Green Waste Bins Bin Size 1X 2X 3X 4X 5X 6X 3 CY $143.94 $222.69 $302.13 $381.14 $460.07 $539.72 Commercial Food Waste Bins Bin Size 1X 2X 3X 4X 5X 6X 3 CY $193.05 $320.91 $449.44 $577.56 $705.58 $834.33 Additional Recycling Bins Bin Size 1X 2X 3X 4X 5X 6X 3 CY $48.13 $82.97 $109.90 $138.04 $165.41 $193.76 Commercial Compactor Service Bin Size 1X 2X 3X 4X 5X 6X 3 CY $253.79 $409.90 $566.97 $723.40 $879.74 $1,037.13 4 CY $303.40 $502.98 $702.45 $901.77 $1,101.09 $1,300.55 6 CY $397.54 $686.27 $974.95 $1,263.47 $1,552.00 $1,840.65 Resolution No. 14-179 - Page 2 P147 ROLL-OFF RATES: Refuse Roll-Offs `Roll-off service rate is charged per service and subject to market rate disposal and processing fees charged per ton. 10-yard 20-yard 40-yard 40-yard compactor $550.37 $550.37 $550.37 $798.19 Additional Refuse Roll-Off Fees • Relocation Fee $61.62 Rental Fee (per day after seven days $24.46 Recycling Roll-Offs *Roll-off service rate is charged per service and subject to market rate disposal and processing fees charged per ton. 10-yard 40-yard 20-yard 40-yard 40-yard C&D C&D Recycling Recycling Wood/Green Compactor Waste $228.03 $178.67 $178.67 $178.67 $178.67 Additional Recycling Roll-Off Fees Relocation Fee $61.62 Rental Fee (per day after seven days $24.46 ADDITIONAL MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE RATES: Additional Miscellaneous Services Fees Extra Pick-Up (barrel): $20.56 Extra Pick-Up (bin) $43.39 Extra Pick-Up (compactor): $86.79 Tilthopper Rental $39.97 Bin Lock $11.42 Push-Out Service *Rates per container, per service frequency 0-25 ft. No Charge 26-50 ft. $39.73 Over 50 ft. $79.45 Section 3. The proposed rates will become effective January 1, 2015. Section 4. This Resolution shall become effective once adopted. Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Resolution No. 14-179 — Page 3 a. (f) rI/ ■ }3�� a C 71M y 0) CZ o C5 C) 0 CD a) a o_ a U z U U)-44 k f 4—,, r sz U W j t .g fig, C,) W , i , .,• �--. r $ Jz�e -0 x :4, i ' v . _ a) CO II LI C U) CO • • N .a = 0 ' . - ■ii • r4 U Q U (n `= 4) C ® moo }, a) a) E ca � Q) N = CO ■ U) 1 . Q t U D Q °� V U , z tk Aso L } • 1 co n CD C O am• •�O c5 jEEj T r {fit `rytRa*. co w -i-' C j r t; z --$. rte;: C > o t o -a 05 ;� EO U O r o + U O) N cr -0 0 O7 C O C n C U C •> = cri ' O V) O • O n N s_ C O C U N g -o O `p p O p O a) V Q - O Cz -0 a n c� in O g •i N O O O Q p s_ Irs = 'a O Q U co t c 73 co 1 N O �� r U = aa. O -a a) •a 4.- . Cl) N M O p N C)C): \ . . >i t = N U •U N , ZU > a U N F., (� N •— •i i CI ae . W kV W W coo) J o- p r:r:' v, °—, 4_,..,.. citoi -o @ 4 u) al a) 33 a) 0 as triReitozzikssier xr1 •C t 0 o _ }0 o o O co co o CD CO 1 Co we t co 0 r CV o .e L V I CV CV r r L. cz 2? r _ c� V., C) o CD 0 al .. m CC N � 05 a cn C W o 0 04 U • — 0 '� " o,4 cif) CS( __n • • , ." V •� - >, U a) U .o N T c I. i CZ■ p ?A +r '- U 1� r Ca 0 O . _ (n C)0,' t, 0 0 N QN i ® o a) •N co O cm E a 5. > W 0 ;w ate $ 0 Q /L���L/11 , ,}Jy � � U �� • • r bx N H y �. u ti I . -0 T E z . •. Q) E } CD 1\ . •Ca i cc a }L+ T 0 ESN 1 c� in it i cc z O N U U >' OO .i O O r as z z N a) O Z O .v as cis Cg ��g \ . _ O N Q = = M no >,, ID n _ al 51 1 a. o o .?::.c. n S Ln s`c f{J. s ' a i KPo.: iy. b` ys yF 3'�". C t T., 1 )t 0) 1 N as rn U . V/ }+ t O C') c 1.0 ; U U O O) D - ._ o a'' " a o a) U° - co = C +r 0 a) 0 co .. 04U � V) x_ a) 0. • • a. . tia Ar4 # % r: a B. , ) a `? �O :,j{t i if)a `t9;3 r a U O C c N D o a) O a I: • C V M N O • n a ) C� -� U)N N D• /u O O / A� a) la3 i i +mi 0 ,:.7U � �, O ! a U O . /T{ i. C �- a) '/ / � (3 Cite„i, • • ;tie. it ,, *101 I J vE cep- e C( .) 01. A9 ,, / 0 Cue. a ©7t ; OF Pez fich oa tG p r cep 05 aC rates 0/ ee/US I it ec,'t(, Rake 0 ten .Sen,v e:✓! 6U e. atone Lgc, le ,20ill tote he ps, 064_-wrote c &cL n7ac4 , � n 4f agse d® net .2 ,4/at frn„% waste . 0 OnGy' if' ec /3 -eue Can or, te € rn ion 1"4 6C'ac ' (-an ne 74 n'oore an 4.J,'c.k._ a rn a n h 0/1_ i Gj r eta & &n- O rn ce. g e k On- iy c5e ) wine be fQy��� for IL) ezk 5 W 1 D the usr rr� Wit 3 , u «� s arren•-79 9°6 4 seri;op, 7fi, 62 9. -t f�car egoja-c% .6k miy5z.?/ wo g' eAre be I ' 6?r[y Re cr e/'rn7 , 6�Pne liarei 746 "ref 923.E L en, oW /tai co co ai a) m w C O o)q) 0) _ -C — O1 .0 J L Ct N C O m — 0 a) y. 3 c c o _c 0 m .c 0 c to i0 U N a) CO O a) N Vl d C E > 0 3 cm r = 3 N o O U N 0 = N co y 0 a) O N c 'c rn o 2 C 3 .3 2 a) o j N y p N _C N 3 .N m N - a a O m 3 N N O S w o f N 2•'N c n '0 o c C -C O` -o C O E a) N N N -0 a) 0) N 3 O-i a) 7 E E w m ai o m 3 m m '°o g E `° a) 8 m m o 3 — a s U) 3 0 L: c O O L.. 3 .0 C --7 O U �. a) cm O O a) y " m y p a C C C_ l0 0 d a Y N a) O .0 to L .N a) 0 a) — N O L c 0 0 N c v) a) co O C a) N O 0) 'C .- E N a U a) y 'a) E w a) -o O c y 2 0 o M Oct E E a E R `I d W 0 s a o a) a U O y -a a) w a) > (6 L m U Co 0 d m w Cr a N o 0)N.o) 0 Q N. N Cr) C a Z rn o) rn a) M IV 2 L 0 1- o 0 m -o - D O m 2 a) O 0 m > J 0 _to Q Y L_ y d a_ c 0 c N •- O 0 Z U c C "c 00) O o) m c -O C J a) )V co O co 0 a) O) EtCO aN N. E u) CD w LO m 0 0 et N a) a) 0) 0 � E m z 0) C T 0 o w m 2 E o c CL co = co co 2 C O) -o c E_ m 10 yZ C 'O N T C p _c C LL m W 0 O X O d E j la co N Ti N w O C C C 0 C U o O U V 'O E 7 U a a m o a) it CC 2 0 Cr _v v v . o 0 o r v C N N N 0 0 0 00 o O N N 1 N M m N. V N- r r a) m \L\ 12ILECT 1111E. NC. REtEIve. Au°0) 2014 July 25,2014 co C City of Rancho Cucamonga coq City Council P.O. Box 807 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-0807 Re: Refuse and Recycling Hauling Rates Increase To Rancho Cucamonga City Council Members: As you can see by my attached copy of the Notice of Public Hearing, I received several of these notices, because I have six properties in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. I am completely against a rate increase. The trash services within the City of Rancho Cucamonga should be put out for competitive bid, before any rate increase happens. Furthermore, you sent out a letter that says that the current and proposed rates are available for review at the office of the City Clerk, but in reality you have put this right on the back of the notice. This letter is my written protest to this proposed rate increase. Sincerely, David R. Moore DRM/yad File: RanchoProtest7.25.14 9449 Ninth Street • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)941-9983 • C-10 No. 575048 • FAX: (909)941-7114 From: Bonnie R Imailto:bonnierq @gmail.com] Sent: Monday,July 28, 2014 9:25 AM To:Whitney,Julie Subject: Raising customer rates To the city of Rancho Cucamonga city council members. HE. raise in rates fur refuse, recycling hauling. In the past t hey use to send out three trucks. And they would come by fairly close toget her. One for recycling , one for Green , and one for the Trash. Now that has changed. A truck comes and picks up refuse. A long I ime goes by eventually, a truck comes and picks up green trimmiugs. Then a long time goes by and a truck come by to pick up recycle and not necessarily in I hat order. So , this past pick up Friday I noted the time one truck would come./ A truck came at 8:45 and picked up green trimmings. At 9:20 a truck carne and picked up my recycle , then at 12: noon the finale truck came and picked up refuse. The previous week stretched out all clay , my recycle was picked up at. 4:00 in the afternoon . so all I Ins pick up can fluctuate. Sins early Bonnie Riedel Quaint ance. T 0 m a) N T C n L L .° 0 m 0 C '— 0 0)N a) C y .`- N - O O) L O L N O — (a y vi. 3 c o n y m Y m Co m. m U C ° p C w >` CO C am. l0 U N a) CO O a) m w v; 0 C m0)a) w•' Cu w 0 m m U 0 C L — Ep U N O '� a) w o 'C N O N c c o) 0 2 c 3 3 2 0 0 r 0 y p W o a) m .N 0 a) n U w m C w t 0 >i w 0 N -0 a 2 3 w w m a m '- m E CO o C 0 C — 0 >,w U N p 0 p 0 C a) O 2 T O w �.'..a C L p U) C . Q CCD U C ? E tO E w m al o -c@ m m -o o f 2 a) ° m o m E S' 0 CO of o 3 0 — oa w 0 Q. 0 CO 3 m w 1- C m m 3 _ C t- -O 0 C_ C_ co a) 0 ca_c w C O V w ° b) a) a) O — CO O L c o O w m m C w N w p C 0 w 0 0 'C •- E— O.0 m rwil W E m a) V O E O V CO Ls) N m 0 C w w m EIS E 0 `, 0 ° 0 a 0 n - d 0 o o = j w 0 L C 0 m O m L w o o Co V (n -o Lt 2 rn 3 2 w e O . 0 to W CC L O O)CO co O) U Q Or r- r r c C. Z rn rn a) rn )a• IV 2 L i T E F O _ p N d a) 'm 2 a) a y m > J = ¢2 a) Y N I L 0 C d V° o r c E 0 c a) o) m to U C — a) V V co _ co 0 rn CO O) It CO N N 0) E uU a) W in 0 0 0 rt w 0 0 L 0 E m p In Cu C >, d Z 0 0 C o m m 2 E ° 0 a • 0 Cu Cu 2 O V E c Cu Cu m Z C -o N T C > JD w Cn W m W 0 0 CC 0 0 a) E 7 m To To To m °, ° c c c o c U To p � P E -o U a w w w E w CC CC CC 0 CC C V V 0I o 0 0 v v N N N N 0 0 0. c0 O O N N N N- C) \ V N- I N. co rn RECEIVED SEP042014 C Y OCY CRCK QA g abzr+ f 1 Me.tn Sibs Crest( h e acs Cuctuatogr. `c CII739 CAN Di" ValitatO ctAta-fr-O`yrr tftl.C1.9 0 4axC�3� C( (toG.vcc6-hrlVt . \Iowa to Cc u r , 917 3cD To c,at,w, i necc.cd cow trvi CUB. ay 2 1 vo-{ Q.s 1 ac5j J _se( -(-&a I osQcQ 114 or co.c-z- ro*-c I P148 STAFF REPORT % PLANNING DEPARTMENT Date: September 17, 2014 RANCHO To: Mayor and Members of the City Council CUCAMONGA John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director By: Mike Smith, Associate Planner Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2013-00887- MANNING HOMES - A request to change the zoning designation of part of a property of approximately 7.16 acres located between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue, at the north side of the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail, about 1,400 feet north of Base Line Road from Low Medium (LM) Residential to Medium (M) Residential District in conjunction with a proposed 46-lot subdivision -APN: 1076-181-01. Related files: Pre-Application Review DRC2013-00545, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912, Development Review DRC2013-01083, Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00889, Minor Exception DRC2014-00161, and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00626. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014-00626 — MANNING HOMES - A request to amend the Development Code to incorporate development standards such as minimum lot dimensions, setbacks, lot coverage, etc. for single-family residential development within the Medium (M) Residential Districts. Related files: Pre-Application Review DRC2013-00545, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912, Zoning Map Amendment DPRC2013-00887, Development Review DRC2013-01083, Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00889, and Minor Exception DRC2014-00161. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve Zoning Map Amendment DRC2013-00887 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00626. BACKGROUND: On August 13, 2014, the Planning Commission reviewed and approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 for the subdivision and Design Review of 45 lots within a property located between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue approximately 1,400 feet north of Base Line Road (Attachments B and C). The Commission also reviewed and approved Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00889 and Minor Exception DRC2014-00161 (Attachments D and E). The Commission reviewed and recommended that the City Council approve the subject Zoning Map and Development Code amendments (Attachments F and G) that are associated with the Tentative Tract Map and Development Review applications. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single-Family Residences; Low Medium (LM) Residential District South - Apartment Complex (part) and Mobile Home Park (part); Medium High (MH) Residential District (part) and Low Medium (LM) Residential District (part) P149 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2013-00887 AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014-00626 — MANNING HOMES September 17, 2014 Page 2 East - Single-Family Residences; Low (L) Residential District West - Retail Store; Medium High (MH) Residential District B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Medium Residential North - Medium Residential South - Medium High Residential (part) and Low Medium Residential (part) East - Low Residential West - Medium High Residential C. Site Characteristics: The project site is a rectangular parcel located between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue, at the north side of the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail, approximately 1,400 feet north of Base Line Road (Exhibit B of Attachment A). The project site has an overall area of approximately 312,000 square feet (7.16 acres). The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 1,200 feet deep (east to west) and 250 feet (north to south). The project site is generally vacant with the exception of a single-family residence that was built circa 1915 that is located at the east side of the project site near Ramona Avenue. To the west of the project site, is an equestrian/pet supplies retail store (CW Feed & Pet). To the north and east are single-family residences (Tracts 12532 and 9450, respectively). To the south is an apartment complex (Sycamore Springs) and a mobile home park (Ramona Villa Mobile Home Estates). The site has street frontage on Archibald Avenue and Ramona Street to the west and east, respectively. Adjacent and parallel to the south property line of the site is the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail which, between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Street, is only partially completed. The zoning of the west half of the site is Medium (M) Residential District, while the zoning of the east half of the site is Low Medium (LM) Residential District. The zoning of the property to the west is Medium High (MH) Residential District. The zoning of the properties to the north is Low Medium (LM) Residential District. The zoning of the properties to the east is Low (L) Residential District. The zoning of the properties to the south (beyond the aforementioned trail) are partly Medium High (MH) Residential District and partly Low Medium (LM) Residential District. The subject property is generally level with a slope that trends from west to east; the elevations at the west and east sides of the property are approximately 1,398 feet and 1,373 feet, respectively. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant proposes to develop the project site by subdividing the property into 45 lots and constructing 45 single-family residences (Exhibits D — G of Attachment A). Associated with the project are a Zoning Map Amendment and a Development Code Amendment to ensure consistency and/or compliance with the General Plan and the Development Code, respectively: Approval of the Tentative Tract Map and Development Review applications are contingent on the approval of these amendments by the City Council. B. Zoning Map Amendment DRC2013-00887: According to the Zoning Map adopted by the City Council on July 18, 2012, the project site is currently within two zoning districts (Attachment H). The western half of the project site, an area of approximately 147,000 square feet (approximately 3.37 acres), is zoned as Medium (M) Residential District. The eastern half of the project, an area of approximately 165,000 square feet (approximately 3.77 acres), is zoned as Low Medium (LM) Residential District. The underlying land use designation of the entire project site is Medium according to Figure LU-2 of the General Plan (Attachment I). It is uncertain why the Zoning Map and General Plan are inconsistent with each other. Nevertheless, in order to address the discrepancy P150 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2013-00887 AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014-00626 — MANNING HOMES September 17, 2014 Page 3 between the Zoning Map and the General Plan, the applicant has submitted a request to amend the Zoning Map. This amendment only affects the zoning designation of the project site. The applicant's request is to amend the underlying Low Medium zoning to Medium that will make the zoning map consistent with the General Plan (Attachment J). Staff notes for the Council's reference that the zoning designation of the subdivision to the north (Tract 12532) is Low Medium (LM) Residential, but the underlying General Plan land use designation is also Medium Residential. C. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00626: The project is for single-family residential development within the Medium (M) Residential District. Currently, "basic" and "optional" development standards are not provided in Tables 17.36.010-1 and 17.36.010-2, respectively, of the Development Code (Attachments K and L). These standards describe the requirements for minimum lot area, minimum lot dimensions (width, depth, street frontage, etc.), building setbacks, lot coverage, etc. and are necessary in order to guide the City and applicants in developing residential projects that are consistent with the General Plan, in accordance with the objective of the applicable Development District (zoning), and comply with other standards and guidelines described in the Development Code. As the standards do not exist, the applicant in coordination with the City, has created a set of draft development standards (Exhibit S of Attachment A). Staff has created a revised version of Table 17.36.010-1 (Attachment M) for incorporation into the Development Code which includes the proposed standards. Staff notes to the Council that following the review of the standards by the Planning Commission, Staff further analyzed the standard for the "corner side yard" setback and revised it. This setback, which is measured from the curb at the street and includes a 12-foot wide public right-of-way (sidewalk and parkway), has been increased by 2 feet so that it will be 17 feet (instead of 15 feet as originally proposed by the applicant) to ensure that a minimum of 5 feet is maintained between any structure and the public right-of-way. The applicant is aware of this revision and is in agreement. The applicant's proposed project is designed according to these standards. These development standards will apply to all single-family residential projects that are proposed in the Medium (M) Residential Districts in the City except within areas of the City governed by separate specific/community plans such as Terra Vista, Victoria, and Etiwanda. In those specific/community plans, such development standards already exist or, if they don't exist, will require separate review and action by City and, therefore, are not subject to this amendment. • D. Neighborhood Meetings: Three (3) neighborhood meetings were conducted to gather input and comments from the owners/residents of the surrounding properties within 660 feet of the project site. All of the meetings were held at Deer Canyon Elementary School at 10225 Hamilton Street. The meetings were held on April 8, April 29, and May 29, 2014. A comprehensive summary of all meetings has been provided in the Planning Commission Staff Report (Attachment A). During all three meetings, the property owners and residents in attendance did not comment on the Development Code Amendment and concerns about the Zoning Map Amendment were limited. One of the concerns about the change in the zoning of the eastern half of the project from Low Medium (LM) Residential to Medium (M) Residential was about the number of dwelling units per acre (density or "du/ac") within the project site. The applicant and staff indicated that the density of the project would be similar to the density of the existing residential development to the north. The proposed density of the project was at the "low" end of the density range allowed in the Medium (M) Residential District (8 du/ac) and not at the "high" end of the density range allowed in that District (14 du/ac); the project would have a density slightly above the "high" end of the density range allowed in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (8 du/ac). Staff further elaborated that the amendment to the zoning map would make the zoning of the project site consistent with the underlying General Plan designation. Another concern was the type of dwelling units, e.g., houses, P151 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2013-00887 AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014-00626 — MANNING HOMES September 17, 2014 Page 4 apartments, condominiums, etc., that were proposed. The applicant indicated that the proposal is for the construction of single-family residences similar to the existing residential development to the north and compatible with the residential development to the east. In both cases, the attendees were generally satisfied with the responses to their comments. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to, for example, air quality (including greenhouse gases), biological resources, hydrology/water quality, and noise there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. Staff received correspondence regarding the project during the early stages of the City's review of the project and following the neighborhood meetings (Exhibit M of Attachment A). Staff also received correspondence from a property owner shortly after the preparation of the Planning Commission Staff Report was completed but before the Planning Commission public hearing (Attachment M). Additional correspondence comprised of letters signed by several property owners indicating support for the project (as currently proposed) were received from the applicant (Attachment NP). All correspondence that was received was reviewed by the Planning Commission prior to their approval and recommendation of approval of the subject applications. No additional correspondence has been received in response to the public hearing notices that were posted in the newspaper, mailed, and/or posted on-site for the City Council public hearing. Respectful submitted, e37A-k771L- Candyc rnett • Planning Director CB:MS/ge Attachment A — Planning Commission Staff Report, dated August 13, 2014 (with all attachments) Attachment B — Planning Commission Resolution No. 14-25 for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 Attachment C — Planning Commission Resolution No. 14-26 for Development Review DRC2013-01083 Attachment D — Planning Commission Resolution No. 14-28 for Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00889 Attachment E — Planning Commission Resolution No. 14-29 for Minor Exception DRC2014-00161 Attachment F — Planning Commission Resolution No. 14-27 Recommending Approval for Zoning Map Amendment DRC2013-00887 Attachment G — Planning Commission Resolution No. 14-30 Recommending Approval for Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00626 Attachment H — Detail of Zoning Map(showing existing zoning designations of the project site) Attachment I — Detail of General Plan Map of Project Site Attachment J — Detail of Zoning Map (showing proposed zoning designation of the project site) Attachment K — Table 17.36.010-1 Development Standards for Residential Zoning Districts Attachment L — Table 17.36.010-2 Optional Development Standards for Residential Zoning Districts P152 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2013-00887 AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014-00626 — MANNING HOMES September 17, 2014 Page 5 Attachment M - Draft Table 17.36.010-1 Incorporating Standards for Single-Family Residential Development in the Medium (M) Residential Districts Attachment N — Correspondence Received from a Property Owner (following completion of the Planning Commission Staff Report) Attachment 0 — Correspondence Received from the Applicant (following completion of the Planning Commission Staff Report) Attachment P — Initial Study Parts I, II, and III Draft Resolution of Approval for Zoning Map Amendment DRC2013-00887 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00626 P153 STAFF REPORT �''+�� PLANNING DEPARTMENT � Date: August 13, 2014 RANCHO To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CUCAMONGA From: Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager By: Mike Smith, Associate Planner Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18912 — MANNING HOMES - A review of a proposed 45-lot subdivision of a vacant parcel of about 7.16 acres within the Medium (M) and Low Medium (LM) Residential Districts located between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue, at the north side of the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail, about 1,400 feet north of Base Line Road - APN: 1076-181-01. Related files: Pre-Application Review DRC2013-00545, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2013-00887, Development Review DRC2013-01083, Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00889, Minor Exception DRC2014-00161, and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00626. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-01083 — MANNING HOMES - A review of a proposal for 45 single-family residences in conjunction with a 45-lot subdivision of about 7.16 acres within the Medium (M) and Low Medium (LM) Residential Districts, located between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue, at the north side of the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail, about 1,400 feet north of Base Line Road - APN: 1076-181-01. Related files: Pre-Application Review DRC2013-00545, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2013-00887, Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00889, Minor Exception DRC2014-00161, and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00626. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2013-00887- MANNING HOMES - A request to change the zoning designation of part of a property of about 7.16 acres located between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue, at the north side of the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail, about 1,400 feet north of Base Line Road from Low Medium (LM) Residential to Medium (M) Residential District in conjunction with a proposed 46-lot• subdivision; APN: 1076-181-01. Related files: Pre-Application Review DRC2013-00545, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912, Development Review DRC2013-01083, Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00889, Minor Exception DRC2014-00161, and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00626. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2013-00889 — MANNING HOMES - A request to remove trees in conjunction with a proposed 45-lot subdivision of a vacant parcel of about 7.16 acres within the Medium (M) and Low Medium (LM) Residential Districts, located between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue, at the north side of the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail, about 1,400 feet north of Base Line Road - APN: 1076-181-01. Related files: Pre-Application Review DRC2013-00545, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912, Zoning Map ATTACHMENT A P154 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18912, DRC2013-01083, DRC2013-00887, DRC2013-00889, DRC2014-00161 AND DRC2014-00626 — MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 2 Amendment DRC2013-00887, Development Review DRC2013-01083, Minor Exception DRC2014-00161, and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00626. MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2014-00161 — MANNING HOMES - A request to allow the construction of interior property line and project perimeter walls that will exceed the maximum height limit of 6 feet (but not exceed 8 feet in height) due to grade differences between lots in conjunction with a proposed 45-lot subdivision of a vacant parcel of about 7.16 acres within the Medium (M) and Low Medium (LM) Residential Districts, located between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue, at the north side of the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail, about 1,400 feet north of Base Line Road - APN: 1076-181-01. Related files: Pre-Application Review DRC2013-00545, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2013-00887, Development Review DRC2013-01083, Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00889, and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00626. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014-00626 — MANNING HOMES: A request to amend the Development Code to incorporate development standards such as minimum lot dimensions, setbacks, lot coverage, etc. for single-family residential development within the Medium (M) Residential Districts. Related files: Pre-Application Review DRC2013-00545, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912, Zoning Map Amendment DPRC2013-00887, Development Review DRC2013-01083, Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00889, and Minor Exception DRC2014-00161. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following actions: • The Planning Commission adopt the resolutions approving Tentative Map Subtt18912, Development Review DRC2013-01083; Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00889 and Minor Exception DRC2014- 00161 • Recommend the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolutions recommending the City Council approve Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00626. BACKGROUND: A conceptual version of this project was initially reviewed by the Planning Commission as workshop item on August 14, 2013 (Exhibit T, Related file: Pre-Application Review DRC2013-00545). At that time, the applicant proposed a subdivision comprised of 42 single-family residential lots with gated access at Ramona Avenue and an extension of La Vine Street that terminated in a cul-de-sac at the west side of the project site. The project has since been revised and is now comprised of 45 lots. The access gate has been eliminated and the cul-de-sac at the extension of La Vine Street has been modified to include a specialized driveway to allow for emergency vehicle access. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single-Family Residences; Low Medium (LM) Residential District South - Apartment Complex (part) and Mobile Home Park (part); Medium High (MH) Residential District (part) and Low Medium (LM) Residential District (part) East - Single-Family Residences; Low (L) Residential District West - Retail Store; Medium High (MH) Residential District P155 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18912, DRC2013-01083, DRC2013-00887, DRC2013-00889, DRC2014-00161, AND DRC2014-00626 — MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 3 B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Medium Residential North - Medium Residential South - Medium High Residential (part) and Low Medium Residential (part) East - Low Residential West - Medium High Residential C. Site Characteristics: The project site is a rectangular parcel located between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue, at the north side of the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail, about 1,400 feet north of Base Line Road (Exhibit B). The project site has an overall area of about 312,000 square feet (7.16 acres). The overall dimensions of the site are about 1,200 feet deep (east to west) and 250 feet (north to south). The project site is generally vacant with the exception of a single-family residence that was built circa 1915 that is located at the east side of the project site near Ramona Avenue. To the west of the project site, is an equestrian/pet supplies retail store (CW Feed & Pet). To the north and east are single-family residences (Tracts 12532 and 9450, respectively). To the south are an apartment complex (Sycamore Springs) and a mobile home park (Ramona Villa Mobile Home Estates). The site has street frontage on Archibald Avenue and Ramona Street to the west and east, respectively. Adjacent, and parallel, to the south property line of the site is the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail which, between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Street, is only partially completed. The zoning of the west half of the site is Medium (M) Residential District, while the zoning of the east half of the site is Low Medium (LM) Residential District. The zoning of the property to the west is Medium High (MH) Residential District. The zoning of the properties to the north is Low Medium (LM) Residential District. The zoning of the properties to the east is Low (L) Residential District. The zoning of the properties to the south (beyond the aforementioned trail) are partly Medium High (MH) Residential District and partly Low Medium (LM) Residential District. The subject property is generally level with a slope that trends from west to east; the elevations at the west and east sides of the property are about 1,398 feet and 1,373 feet, respectively. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant proposes to subdivide the property into 45 lots for a single-family residential development. The lots will be developed in accordance with new development standards that will apply to single-family residential development within the Medium (M) Residential Districts and are the subject of related Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00626. Individual lot areas will range between 4,013 square feet to 10,529 square feet; the average lot area is 4,907 square feet. The depth of each lot will be at least 90 feet with the exception of Lots 26, 27, 44, and 45. Those lots will have a depth of between about 60 feet and 80 feet. The width of each lot except the above-noted lots at the required front setback will be between 45 feet and 50 feet. Lots 26, 27, 44, and 45 will have a width of between 65 feet (Lot 27) to 137 feet (Lot 26). As noted previously, access to the subdivision will be via a new street (hereafter referred to as "La Vine Street")that will connect directly to Ramona Street. This street will terminate in a cul-de-sac at the west side of the project site. For emergency purposes a second point of access will be constructed at the end of the cul-de-sac and connect to Archibald Avenue via a specialized driveway (referred to as an emergency vehicle access (EVA)). Although the technical/design details of this EVA are still being determined, in addition to being wide enough for an emergency vehicle, it will include landscaping and a walkway for direct pedestrian access to Archibald Avenue and the adjoining trail. The project also includes the construction of missing improvements in the aforementioned Pacific Electric trail. P156 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18912, DRC2013-01083, DRC2013-00887, DRC2013-00889, DRC2014-00161, AND DRC2014-00626 — MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 4 In conjunction with the tentative tract map, the applicant proposes to construct a single-family residence on each lot for a total of 45 single-family residences. Although all of the houses will be two-story, the proposal does not conflict with Section 17.122.010(A)(1)(a) of the Development Code which requires a minimum of 25 percent of the houses in a residential development to be single-story. That Code section only applies to residential development with lots in excess of 7,200 square feet. The applicant proposes four (4) types of architectural themes (elevations) — Traditional, Bungalow, Spanish, and Cottage. Each house will incorporate a variety of materials to varying degrees depending on the theme. Each house will have an articulated footprint/floor plan and profile. The applicant proposes four (4) distinct footprints — Plans 1, 2, and 3, and reverse footprints of each for a total of six (6) footprints. The floor area of the houses will be between 2,566 square feet (Plan 1) and 3,163 square feet (Plan 3). The number of available footprints will comply with Table 17.122.010-1 of the Development Code. Because the footprints and profiles of each house differ, there will be a variety of movement in the wall planes and roof lines. B. Neighborhood Meetings: Three (3) neighborhood meetings were conducted to gather input and comments from the owners/residents of the surrounding properties within 660 feet of the project site. All of the meetings were held at Deer Canyon Elementary School at 10225 Hamilton Street. The first meeting was held on April 8, 2014. The applicant incorrectly addressed the notification letters for this meeting and, as a result, the correct recipients were not notified. However, despite this error there were several individuals present. Thus, the meeting continued as scheduled with the understanding that there would be a second meeting scheduled for a later date. The second and third meetings were conducted on April 29, 2014, and May 29, 2014, respectively. The following is a summary of those meetings. The applicant has also provided a summary of each of the meetings (Exhibits 1-2, J-2, and K-2). 1. Neighborhood Meeting #1 (April 8, 2014): At this meeting, the applicant presented the proposal to the owners/residents in attendance. Staff from both Fire Construction Services and the Planning Department were present to address questions. The majority, if not all, of the owners/residents expressed opposition to this version because of the proposed connection of La Vine Street to Newton Place (Exhibit 1-3). The principal reason for their opposition was increased traffic and diminished traffic safety on Newton Place and other streets within Tract 12532. Staff from the Fire Department explained that the connection was necessary to ensure public safety. Two points of access were necessary so that emergency vehicles could enter the subdivision without interfering with normal traffic flow and/or blocking residents from exiting the subdivision. Furthermore, the Newton Place connection was identified as the most direct path of travel for emergency vehicles originating from the nearest fire station at 6627 Amethyst Avenue located about 0.60-mile to the northwest of the project site. Staff from the Planning Department explained that the connection of the streets was logical as Newton Place was designed to connect to a future street based on its design, i.e., it ended as a stub and not as a cul-de-sac constructed per City standard. However, those in attendance stated that the neighborhood had become accustomed to Newton Place being a cul-de-sac despite its appearance and that it had been that way for over 30 years since their subdivision was constructed in the 1980s. Therefore, they continued to be strongly opposed to it. Following this meeting, staff received phone calls and correspondence opposing the project (Exhibit M). This was in addition to comments that were received by staff during the early P157 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18912, DRC2013-01083, DRC2013-00887, DRC2013-00889, DRC2014-00161, AND DRC2014-00626 — MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 5 stages of the City's review of the project. Staff subsequently began the process of exploring other design solutions in coordination with other City departments (particularly Fire Construction Services) and the applicant. The design solution that was eventually agreed upon eliminated the connection between La Vine Street and Newton Place, and La Vine Street was re-designed to end in a cul-de-sac with an emergency vehicle access (EVA) driveway connecting to Archibald Avenue. 2. Neighborhood Meeting #2 (April 29, 2014): This meeting served as the first official neighborhood meeting. There were more owners/residents in attendance at this meeting than at the meeting held on April 8, 2014. The applicant presented the revised version of the project at this meeting (Exhibit J-3). As the revision to the street design caused changes to other aspects of the project, e.g. house plotting, lot layout, number of lots, lot dimensions, etc., and they did not have sufficient time to complete the details of those changes, the applicant's presentation was limited to the basic, conceptual design of the subdivision. Joining the City staff from Fire Construction Services and the Planning Department, who were present at the first meeting, were additional staff members from the Engineering and Traffic Engineering Services Departments. Most of the attendees (in particular, the owners/residents from Tract 12532) were in favor of this version because of the elimination of the proposed connection of La Vine Street to Newton Place. However, some of the owners/residents of the properties located to the east of the proposed project had reservations. They were concerned that the traffic volume generated by the proposed subdivision was now being concentrated towards the east side of the project site and that this would negatively impact the intersection of La Vine Street and Ramona Avenue. They also cited increased traffic volume and diminished traffic safety on Ramona Avenue in general. Some questioned why La Vine Street did not connect to Archibald Avenue instead of, or in addition to, Ramona Avenue. Lastly, there were questions about improvements on Ramona Avenue. Staff from the Traffic Engineering Services Department explained that the traffic volume generated by the project was within the design capacity of the subject intersection and Ramona Avenue in general. A connection of La Vine Street to Archibald Avenue would compromise traffic safety and traffic circulation due to its proximity to the existing intersections of Camden Drive and Archibald Avenue, and the Pacific Electric trail and Archibald Avenue, to the north and south, respectively. Regarding street improvements, the applicant will be required to construct street improvements along Ramona Avenue that will improve traffic safety and efficiency. These improvements include widening the street; installing a sidewalk, curb, and gutter; constructing drainage improvements; and relocating overhead utility lines underground. 3. Neighborhood Meeting #3 (May 29, 2014): This meeting served as an opportunity to present the final version of the project (K-3). There was a similar number of owners/residents in attendance at this meeting as the meeting that was held on April 29, 2014. City staff that attended the previous meeting were also in attendance at this meeting. The project was conceptually the same as presented on April 29, 2014 - the only significant difference was that finalized details such as house plotting, lot layout, number of lots, lot dimensions, etc. were available. The focus of the comments and overall discussion continued to be on the traffic volume and circulation at the intersection of La Vine Street and Ramona Avenue and on Ramona Avenue itself. P158 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18912, DRC2013-01083, DRC2013-00887, DRC2013-00889, DRC2014-00161, AND DRC2014-00626 — MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 6 During all three neighborhood meetings the owners/residents cited concerns about other issues including construction noise; dust control; the removal of a windrow of Eucalyptus trees along the north side of the project site; the loss of privacy; and animals leaving the project site during construction and entering the adjacent properties. Staff responded that the requirements of the Development Code, special conditions of approval, and/or environmental mitigations will address these issues and minimize, if not eliminate, these impacts. With the exception of questions about the floor area, timing of construction, and anticipated prices of the proposed homes, none of the owners/residents present during the three meetings had any significant concerns with the architecture of the houses. Following the neighborhood meetings on April 29, 2014, and May 29, 2014, staff believes the level of opposition to the project has significantly lessened. However, Staff continued to receive some correspondence afterwards and has included it for review by the Commission (Exhibit M). C. Grading and Technical Review Committees: The Grading Review Committee (Addington and Miller) and the Technical Review Committee reviewed the proposal on June 3, 2014. The Committees accepted the proposal and recommended approval. The Committees' conditions have been incorporated into the Resolutions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083. D. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Oaxaca and Granger) reviewed the proposal on June 3, 2014 (Exhibit N). The Committee generally accepted the proposal as submitted subject to revisions that were to be verified by staff. These revisions were, for example, adding decorative ironwork details and arched/recessed windows to the Spanish theme; altering the roof pitch of the Cottage theme to 6:12; adding decorative stone veneers on specific elevations of the Cottage and Traditional theme; adding windows on the garage doors of at least 50 percent of the homes; and adding vertical elements to the garage doors of the Bungalow and Traditional themes. The applicant subsequently revised the architecture. Staff, on behalf of the Committee, reviewed the revisions and determined that they were completed as requested. Their conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2013-01083. E. Zoning Map Amendment DRC2013-00887: According to the Zoning Map adopted by the City Council on July 18, 2012, the project site is currently within two zoning districts (Exhibit 0). The western half of the project site, an area of about 147,000 square feet (about 3.37 acres), is zoned as Medium (M) Residential District. The eastern half of the project, an area of about 165,000 square feet (about 3.77 acres), is zoned as Low Medium (LM) Residential District. The underlying land use designation of the entire project site is Medium according to Figure LU-2 of the General Plan (Exhibit P). It is uncertain why the Zoning Map and General Plan are inconsistent with each other. Nevertheless, in order to address the discrepancy between the Zoning Map and the General Plan, the applicant has submitted a request to amend the Zoning Map. This amendment only affects the zoning designation of the project site. Staff notes for the Commission's reference that the zoning designation of the subdivision to the north (Tract 12532) is Low Medium (LM) Residential, but the underlying General Plan land use designation is also Medium Residential. Therefore, the applicant's request is to amend the underlying Low Medium zoning to Medium, consistent with the General Plan. F. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00626: The project is for single-family residential development within the Medium (M) Residential District. Currently, "basic" and "optional" development standards are not provided in Tables 17.36.010-1 and 17.36.010-2, respectively, of the Development Code (Exhibit Q and R). These standards describe the requirements for minimum lot area, minimum lot dimensions (width, depth, street frontage, etc.), building setbacks, lot coverage, etc. and are necessary in order to guide the City and applicants in developing residential projects that are consistent with the General Plan, in accordance with the objective of the applicable development district (zoning), and comply with other standards and guidelines P159 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18912, DRC2013-01083, DRC2013-00887, DRC2013-00889, DRC2014-00161, AND DRC2014-00626 — MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 7 described in the Development Code. As the standards do not exist, the applicant in coordination with the City, has created a set of draft development standards (Exhibit S) for incorporation into the Development Code. The applicant's proposed project is designed according to these standards. These development standards will apply to all single-family residential projects that are proposed in the Medium (M) Residential Districts in the City except within areas of the City governed by separate specific/community plans such as Terra Vista, Victoria, and Etiwanda. In those specific/community plans, such development standards already exist or, if they don't exist, will require separate review and action by City and, therefore, are not subject to this amendment. G. Minor Exception DRC2014-00161: The applicant submitted a Minor Exception to allow the construction of combination walls (garden/screen walls on top of retaining walls) with a height of up to 8 feet along the interior property lines of several lots within the proposed subdivision and the project perimeter walls at Lots 25, 26, and 45. Per Table 17.48.050-1 of the Development Code, the maximum wall height of fences and walls is 6 feet. The proposed walls will be located generally where there are grade differences (Exhibit H) that warrant retaining walls. Generally the natural terrain of the project site slopes from west to east. Therefore, the usual alternative, an earthen slope, is not practical because of the lack of available space in the side yards between the house (which with a few exceptions, are on the east and west sides of the house) and the property line wall. As most of the walls will be along common interior side property lines, the increased height of the walls will not be observable from public view; where the walls are located adjacent to a street, the increased height of the wall will be most observable from the interior of the project site (at Lots 25 and 26) or the height of the wall occurs along only a short length of wall (at Lot 45). H. Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00889: The proposed project includes the removal of numerous trees that are at various locations within the project site. The applicant submitted a Tree Survey Report, prepared by BonTerra Psomas on February 12, 2014, that included the description and health of the individual trees and their overall health and condition. The survey identified 117 of these trees as "heritage" trees which are subject to the City's tree preservation requirements as described in Section 17.80.050 of the Development Code. As it is necessary to remove the trees in order to grade the site and construct future single-family residences and associated improvements which will allow economic enjoyment of the property; the applicant has submitted a Tree Removal Permit. The proposed project includes the planting of new trees on a one-to-one basis to replace the trees that are removed. The trees that are located within the Eucalyptus windrow along the north side of the project site will be replaced with new trees of a minimum 24-inch box size. These replacement trees will be in addition to the trees that are required by the Development Code for new residential development. There are also numerous fruit-bearing trees within the project site that will be removed —these trees are not subject to the City's tree preservation requirements. I. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to, for example, air quality (including greenhouse gases), biological resources, hydrology/water quality, and noise there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot P160 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18912, DRC2013-01083, DRC2013-00887, DRC2013-00889, DRC2014-00161, AND DRC2014-00626 — MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 8 radius of the project site. Although staff received correspondence regarding the project during the early stages of the City's review of the project and following the neighborhood meetings, no additional correspondence has been received in response to the public hearing notices that were posted in the newspaper, mailed, and/or posted on-site. Respectfully submitted, Ad Candyce ett Planning Manager CB:MS/ge Attachments: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Aerial Photo Exhibit C - Site Utilization Map Exhibit D - Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 Exhibit E - Site Plan Exhibit F - Conceptual Precise Grading Plan and Sections Exhibit G - Floor Plans and Elevations Exhibit H - Landscape/Wall Plans Exhibit I-1 - Neighborhood Meeting Sign-In Sheets (April 8, 2014) Exhibit 1-2 - Neighborhood Meeting Summary (prepared by the Applicant) Exhibit 1-3 - Subdivision Design as of April 8, 2014 Exhibit J-1 - Neighborhood Meeting Sign-In Sheet (April 29, 2014) Exhibit J-2- Neighborhood Meeting Summary (prepared by the Applicant) Exhibit J-3- Subdivision Design as of April 29, 2014 Exhibit K-1- Neighborhood Meeting Sign-In Sheet (May 29, 2014) Exhibit K-2- Neighborhood Meeting Summary (prepared by the Applicant) Exhibit K-3- "Finalized" Subdivision Design as of May 29, 2014 Exhibit L - Correspondence from Applicant Exhibit M - Correspondence from Property Owners/Residents Exhibit N - Design Review Committee Action Comments, June 3, 2014 Exhibit 0 - Zoning Map of Project Site Exhibit P - General Plan Map of Project Site Exhibit Q - Table 17.36.010-1 Development Standards for Residential Zoning Districts Exhibit R - Table 17.36.010-2 Optional Development Standards for Residential Zoning Districts Exhibit S - Proposed Development Standards for Single-Family Residential Development in the Medium (M) Residential Districts Exhibit T - Minutes for Pre-Application Review DRC2013-00545 Exhibit U - Initial Study Part 1, II, and III Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2013-01083 Draft Resolution of Approval for Zoning Map Amendment DRC2013-00887 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00889 Draft Resolution of Approval for Minor Exception DRC2014-00161 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00626 V , . . , Li 1 5T : ___11____Ii _2:__ __=_, HI I.ID 1 RD__ _ L ____.___ '-.'r---'--11---1.01 r PIA. X.'mai la /I e*NNW, se ,-sr i. M: ne I; t; , 1 PRE"—E <, •= is • w----, r!_,49..2.!a ES, IngsA.1! I -la ''1 ••' ' 11,,';',,,,,,A* *I'M"' X I m SISCSfirit m , t• 1:./tomml. ._ir .__ .1....: L,, 1 - I write . ,gv, ,41___ -- .• ,. f ,TRUISM ___ji 1-iLtitAAST i WILSON AVE'I - SI, . 'Dtli"v"F _ __ WILSON AVE 5. -41.- .- ,,, - , , F, t z -1 SKR DR r--- --1 E ., .. wiff f , ,11„;-.,...osA ,,, 177 . k--,,,, :r= - -- 1-L.....„,.. -•,,,.4J 1 1 I L i q ..,.,..., i 1 1 1 IV/SOROS CEDA___t_MiR -4 ti. lititak --7- mean C---;c6—ETTY5._ ''• ' II r'''-'- A DR . 1, 7,01°0 ar_ CHAFFEY r— q-' A 5.Limeil 1MAIMPW---1". -"110614'-'11---271= —I iltralili-,J=311-4r-j-41- a Aln- S' : 11-,11 COLLEGE SEAS PSIS OR 2/4 1., 1 rit 1 clif_.ii Il impo • • ‘A ZW....T ) GOAREMS3 ll - . :I i ilemsol - •-,,1_—__ftmio, 1„.,--„, g".49gl!b••5r--., _J__, 24 1 r -i'l ---±-1''' k4L. 1.,.., ---4 ,INES44121_1 fl Il- 1 11, 1"--1: 1„.....— JI 161 II .0. :., .. ..' LiLi' c°c".---4- . i -„,—; • 12 s,": -ir reencycw—, ii__„,.. to ` 10500 Al LI I '''1 16 II l'A 74PTA, t_i_At__, •11 .-+e 5 in] -'cijim-1 ' j : a4 rt : ,1 '24: i' l' mli A ALTA % Attu,---- , --•-• 8-4,-NA, il , •.1.4-,.____ „ i, : PROJECT SITE ili 1 _..? -) ',-..•'giSIMS1 --i • , KE. _ I ...,,i , ; tL__ , , 1 . --- - - • • _I ilL_KON K____• L i ___:_ 1 f I..:,,■;, . ,,..„ . , „ : L : %! gi ...LAI._ ____ i''. 4.4.1A10/111.1 .,212,-1-----'L, .j. t 1-" •• UNMAN 1 i_hi--1, .-- ]- ir 1 ...L_-.,,,_ _. • .,.. '-.- Aki. ii _. .____ _ _-__:-.a-- :-, BERYL PARK a.6 HIGHLAND AVE - ;Err_ 8 ,-..*7--\ -.01ffl-t4.• e..-- 11 210-•------- - -- --..-.........._ __ -..w..----- 2 CATIGNAL CT GAROAN 1 W 1RWISBCT la II b, ,; It [it 1 fl*".'''' ■ ,1 3smici • - i im'amr,a 11".i!,,a1 3POSTR el 0 ri ,Llamiya. L WI Mil ligAli 4 i 1.1 ..TAWLEV1000 CT \ H617111 ' -I kl_s,swam , ,..N.:" - ,. b Station ill r--'5:"4.1"PTC.C., ',-,51 . . .. . .4ok- ...• _A._ &L__ ..- )..,---,14-taka, 1 —601,---1 1 19TH g, PD. -,-------- i'-17-----444'—} 4g. II .....-4...,--:,„ ----I• -', .--'-i--1.4 - , ..,",, ,., , .1,,,.,..„..t1, ,,.... . - , "...""....„ ,. .:,. 1., ,,,, ,__ i,.. :PAN4--vATN __-_-_,-I ,... , . li, iri.,64t/ __.,,,' -v„.•., II-- ; -...1.11L_YLLA ; ,Strig-ope ,_ .. =TIT:kit-IA-11*i ,,,..0 if=::::,741 i •„___10, 0,407:, n.- 1_1 1 _ 'VICTORIA___,II_X__/ _.L c.„ ' • I .= 2 I „, j kw ,,amoieL :.::.•...,-, i---4,1 QugaIgm_11, 4r-4—,, „ ,,-----).-- J.,,s---c------1 __,..1,... ,.----,=,‘ J1_ 7 g R ,t-c,, -_sa.,•..Agwn.',pr. ' -11- i • -__§_r_----x-- =• — L_ .1 ...,Imiiii, ,---, ---,,-- r .. 1., .s 8 . ,----......_,_ ,u , ...gi.m.AT ....<,- ,..' 11 , 111giffili .1 - 'er-/ ' ------k 51 -ir cwrosi . s § :Imog ST____t___..,ria ALTA gLik-:i IL] -ix sr_t_st_t_ 2:4, .z ._!-_,. ,f.. I _1( f 4 - - •I'a-j—.E--7B-j•= _-„.g_ -1 _imm. ..3..1-,-, ...;'. I-1-11—"'"' -- ----w; `tAwNE sT- > et sJasgs _IL ..r l'..CARNELIAN 4 ,•ASS.air_ .-r, - "j- - ALTA ,.7., ...t.71, igw,_.1____...,. ,e-L—P) ii___AL..40, 1 11! •..4---A4; - 1 A LOMA ,.. t.. 5_,, -4 .1 1,,,,,,,,,, <<: . i x !- ii-•. T----11 , . • ,. 1,„....., RANCHO CUCAlvION ., i ..... t, ,. . .,, ;, II CENTRAL PARK r„„Aossi . LioNs :, .0._, .r---- 1"1 db—...1 4.111'1 . , i,,, CISAMJIT 17 ..J.3ASf iltIA ; 9i,,a RD -/ •Gw. m°44----, E _ rm-,I.LIBRA' i IR.-- . sT 1 ...,,,,, saiMisie ..1.,assj ,..._ i...- 'TV!, t.,SPUR , •S••,--1 1,1 11 1'1 mm"7-1-rutr - .... • .' 1,_ ;'4,AlLve,,,tti i_Iiimr i 1 . ortoo.I .-r ,'‘'.7:0511s: 4, liAVItl",- a.yr lie* ,< 1 r. _ .. II --- 1 i...=• - --; 1 i mi ---., ' ,.-C•Bciat )'--- --0,--.11 'M ' gk-i..1,1i, LcktiyAt•T . • . /sr 1 - . . 4-1.1 ...., ._it_1 ,, , t 51.-44,„.4• - /., lf.--.;7. __ ---ir-A___ .1 ..i- RED cAL., :-,_,-., ST IV I ! --, 1 51r41141; mADA't MU ar PRAM —I . 0 a141 ___ (,, L_ 5_P1112 St W._, ,_, ' -__APAI-0 AURR Ill „S 0-3 ''--------;-!--a ' ,317 ( PARK .-9466,u___\ . J.k. - --BALSA _ar_11----: - E I : 11 !if ----!IL4r: .1__.1.___. 1 ,' • I; - - •--------,-- , , § k I A "45-51-----1 1 I J a Ell 71 , ' 4j#-• '4.1aunTRJ-JJ/jj ,-,-V -.---_, 1 ,I ,II. II gM . j:--11 I I I 1 LiIi4LL 1 ..:[: Eli F,1 kit' . .;W.:ft ./;Tc, .-'i 7 li i ,I 1 11 k,' ..ztair = \, I 3 ill 1,..,...*,,, ALLE 1 V g' //.. _ 1 g ' :E.1 • h, :. , ' ll A -. , . IR I i h_. 1 wicaggH.Hic.: _:" STA ----- /1 ` ?,•/ i g ?, 1—'1!Prlji ---------1 '4-V.114-ifl ---:____ .,:_tesmasi. I 44A.61,-1---t • • - `-,--• ..w._,..-1_1-'•*-51. i -.' 11 mw''' -- _ek..teams_rILK 101 . , ' ! vE ' / (.;/ it .. .k.- x ' • 'cp.: 4-'8 ,, , _, , 000, LIT__si• ---:11----1, : , Ifisfr :5,44,7771,41.i.__ --....4------ 4-___.• - • li •Q twrgwa-7* A.,,, , 0.1,4: ,,rt .i, c: „, •-• - , 1 1 1,k tb....”.1... ,-.1- __, 1,1F .g4KRAR__ _g_ ...liana ST _ ._______ ,•. . . ,. .-,..., RALPI{AV.1 15,3_4„.4.) oy, FAMILY US . TOWN CENTER Station 2tImgdav Itiliiri . _ lc., . CENTER ifEB4DAIT- • 0- HISTORIC 166 COURT -, .:-I--g--- El AmrasKE HOUSE -LkAuRri .. .a.su,, -----.1 7‘ <,,• -1,F 11 ,- I CITY 11, ,1.-- `. ---------i l' I ' . lulksii w41'41 11, HALL L I 0 \\ ir nr-li.I, t . Ej' >- ,.t. n , igirg-LY-6-5---i -LA_=_,L068866 t__ ' _ : ...._ • EPOLICE j. j HERITAGE‘, ) MACS 7, ---0. _. -TA •, 'A HOSPITAL L_______-, , Erds1 s'-'' • 9,:,,AmE, WWI 11‘ 4_1 RV BUisScso sr cT- ss,kfr,A.,SlIWIDGE ws e I ,Flolix-T,sr ; Ffum_A:s,T' - L, r_yAi ST ACM PL TPO'''?:111.11At 3■A . .51 -!I______ , I V - 2 1 f (/ ;.,.wiz 24, 1--------m----1 UM. Au,MICA * • - a I - ---aairm--- cALL -NEAR ,i. ' L. , ,. ,3111ERNIIMER i — - 1 ' . ' 1 s.,-; ' ' •BROIL ROUT r,::::__ iL _ ,,,,-,00 . ei ...--......--, 7:'. ------. ----&---- -. I I ....... WOO '. ■ 1 -i r.' 7 CT__lurilf 101 ......, !!„ L- ira° .100511CALE Pi I :01ADS4A011EASOVAS LA DMV . a 'Ig___,W_RCIIITER.I -,,,.....5,1-. Immo' 1 (i. suISORSOSA0 1 !,Plta Furs LF PI. 4; i: If lii[r f- .4tir =_, t_ _ ; ' Ili u ..1 pe. 8113bq 9711.ST j el CLICAlikr&I WINE' 4' r--__.- , .1 9 5 L.1 RI VD , _ IC I I IL 'Ili,-41.•114;c1 grata;1,..f.4_._ rt - 1 EXHIBIT A ,,„. 1 , E _ SERPI 4 0I _______,, ce timig_ _____ii 4 —II-- •-..- -1.-, i --1F =,': . i i i 1 _amm.-. _ . •METROLINK TRAW Matra Statlet ----- . ••••••••••--.-- ST 8TH ;II - - -2 ...., , .,0 ..... ., ., , • ' f ' , . 4.--- -s ,• y . 1 ci, II -4144 LO t l L �p lig O• O , Fr CV C 1" 1 ID U▪ O t _+ r , i ° 171- '` - Ramona Avenue _._ W - r � t :• w . ., A., .110.111: lila 1111 t6 to <;� i• 7 .00 (:"-dk i ' i . . --ti K . ..,.., *• .t... c: . , T. _ . . ,,,. .__ . , ,, ,.., . . ..ray, , .` . . I liter g 0 . M N 1� ' 11 -r r• * •+ • -IIIP co c,-, :,.. . . ,.. - i w .,,.. , .' •••;:11111 --do)lug IIIM ,_ CV 1— % • 0 - ' ---- mi.mi ----iip Ct• r3- .'-'' ' I 1.. - _ ii,.. ... . , ..,.., • • . ..... .„ 111q111/3111F1- w,...w.... . a> 4:., , 1 _ , 0 C.4 CD 1y. L I ti. lt ,., o , ,- • • W ' , - I x i� U •� ! Rif .�. • -• t .4.. V �� I �l ��`� . -�. • ' Newton Places p4 4 • ...1 4E. , 44X„,zi reg.' . . , , - i - file..,.-- e'. 03 a C �• • : •• .,1 ; Archibald- . — -0:3 0 L. .... / c°^1/4', .. api. F• . ... io.:, i •••.0ifii• Id , . ...,. . I 1, . o EXHIBIT ' I. `. 11163 x 2'7 r //11 $iii iii iie a N , ; 131x$ illgg IIIII 3 ‹ .Z I/ 151111,1iiilligill'illill!fi w.�yf, 7d. ;fY l.3:Y?,,,3.3 Rxe5-xotwa p} s t -----,- ,. 1 il .• 01:7; . %'-'egir: . '' - 3q g gg 1 * N {•' g i i i., ;:.(a:_- is { 1 • 'if om[ Lig T eg k " . . -. 1 . U,t' 9 �a IF `▪ tR ; A, ,qT it ► - i- - i,--- 016 i'll 1-6 •l. 't' - # �TL 1�� # !� 7 n fl '.r. asry '� .F , n3 1 „i. ., J' ow, { 47 g r-f•y f rt r T L � i::::. a,..,,. 4--•-11 In-ci',• . - .k ,. . . _.,_,_ _ , . ......0 , ._. \ , . .. ..,,i 7 .y.4 e - P. w .Isltrie � , --- a lie tI:L. . -1■.* -.1 tki — V+a ':,r -,emits-•-' a . , I 1 1J1 ,. pq 11 ' ! �;, ".,`-- -- ' / - - • 'A.1;.:� .. -less!" M.A.=On MADOLE i9RAfNE MCI WP t 119.2 .y.eati O��r r u .•. �.._ PC $I I,�I MANNNNG HOMES "°"ED'op ''"""'"cH liner S Neanar'EACH RVOIDQY/Mb10A G4/an: G Y!! ! 0 119.MO)V0,200 EXHIBIT C P164 oce►aa Po001`33l e11tA11.3 V.011/3n704.14Ytl 000241 YJ WY36110dg311 K °°' °�NWV S2I1OH ONINNVIN NY-Id as a3iviia _ S3'1oH DMrrNVry 1°,t�"'^'• 3 tn�;-� 2t6.oll ern'17YY1 3NtYUBI II 9 Yl b •WV V/0 av..a 310 Si7MM7 did l33f0•d S1N31N07 7NH1YEK7 ❑ a�J■JrJ■ /8®ledYl 1 i i IIL[Iii • mi r■ily i 111•0111111313•7 , Imam, — i I K'RR•D.T1 # i 3 d s I $ WI : ENIMIEredirerliii-• .1 ,., 1 1 I E 1 i 1 - I •�. t - - ' �,''nn■■■■ �i .. tI :, :111 l 51!,E7y�j 5Y5 fc I -.ki_ ep9p}iii ' l . i. 'll rill 1 , di 9g'.# gi ll l&eil.," miii !f i 1 ,A SINS -:,-'°, �i i g1�_ i6, '1 �t ' 'I Ill t ye end ti 111 �� :',I1 j�i I �Ji 4�t� '^�3y�i # 15 _ e:.,.�j f, iii giItt i ii i is §11,r C\I i 111 06.r.—r lj�'; W I II iji ,'. ,� - za ; -; 111 aI I{.f=- ♦ M i ! 1 o - F . 8 i mHj, ,_Q See0 2_, eF -'sW i r�- M, � 'r i • I: `� l E h II o B,. Yr.t..g.Ep , ., tll O o I �. ! I ; Z i�2= ,f I ingpilml 'Al r- _ T � � 11 11 Q LL •U y Re � O w � �� , ;1! _�. i7�7i1 I 1 z Z � Ums I . � 'z i!IHIIIUIIHI rc R i ' 4i ,e w w 4 I will IL I1 .4* , J a f.a.�.-�i0 �; !flI!!IIIh 1 i!!ii i i�eill w % ' I gm - I •- W LL I II/ i — - 4 1a -.o � u �1 _ �•= ,, s k II III I _ . .1 iii: ,"„ I 141;111-1,11 'NIP= , I ;31111::::::::: Q H . _ t all, ,11 g , s]!1111 iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii i 11 I— I .. ! --a , i I IM III ....Z -,.II ii-41:11-P-", l', 1 1 , ,Iiiinimilirrinbiliminffilini 1 .,.,,3NYM ,W A mai 1,t . : I;lllIII:::: :::::'• I _'1_ - It 'ariferill "r41... ', . 5 - = ` -■ ! !, �i t �_ � 1_1E— �� I ' ii It la,FAli �i'y ,; I till t ' . - =-= t . ■ Mall ' 1 111 i , O `.1x \ p ' -7------. 1111`3 IW 21" ''ll Y 8 1 'hp 4\*._..,:\gl, ./ �i i 1,:'.!;1 1; : ; jj} nd NO Pe g//3/14 14� y �� _ �`• EXHIBIT D .„.1 \•!A i. P165 0997.4 VD.31,3B 11103N]1 MO AWLS" ry S2YVOH ONINNVV1 dV11O"� a 3 y i.,GI'W AN 1D•1 3111•0131 S - � �"w"°""310 s3�No Irl3 :mai uK3ua3 :lawraa s u®w_ D a33w314a h : k ?� _ MI .1f»IO-,' e Yf�3 S 1+q �i(y/.e :1!y s'a ✓F �-- .ILL J _ 1 !f'b19 Y!✓ -. •.i, Ili 8119 PI 1� i � 1 2'18 E E Yf R�' -.2. f. f- �_ _ 6 a 119 PI• r { e .�- == i -= MI,�f! E ll i 11;lid ' I!! i i a a _ _ ' 1 3l[iii ' ` ig E iial i ±/ ' Iii .E ii. gIE�EFEl6 q1:11 T9E Yltl a#t 14 6 h a. " 'i E. <� ,..„ ' IL, + i a 4 �e E I:i: 6 IJi i Wa E - N 4 1 i • 1 4I- ..„4 i '� _u• . .c - iii, p ,,,, •• f_C=:_f'_4RR:.51��rtRRRR:�it Rita11,1.9:9Qi9i �.i 1 n s N K' a ■ t Di Q N fly • W 9 ', f I .. 1f ~z$; - N% iii ti _I '" I- u12 - ' au i11 - *. hi i . II, 1J G,3133W9M ter. I . s R i ,1 I i. f1, ai' i 1 1 171 • .1 ti re • R dk .� ., f' 1 i kd p p i a [s. 5eY[ Y y Rpt��e' '` F �1 1r S !ii I Ez a. ..w9 I i.>. j i ! ,1:71.6if.-YLT 'JVA ". ,,,,,, m J•. • It 'I Y• ill I EXHIBIT E ____ ... ,. P166 05M 132111.6143.12 MS KYR S INOH ONINNWIN W D 1CV a 4-A 3 rdnldIOrroO '5," 9 Cs, T ow.rD veonnev maw `+ '."''""."310 ,�®,._.. S3owN: ,.va 133fOad su,3W03 711MIA i U s JAI/ 4 t 41 a 11 -- _ _ 3 I w � - sa � p �.`�°- `rrSn•'r�r+owW q .p�, __F—__—__— O Yx w ' 8 I "--a„g.• •`+�i Y' _ _N � - (' W .62 _ O U S 3.X ����� ink �#`mow.. "Ti' • ___�w_� _— Z W Z 1 I I W 6 l• PIPIPl � -tom' ., 2 - a .W �O I mo Oa n O O 0 Very :I1 LL.(7 Otz NQ.W 2 O i ZN N<m 2Vg 3 a " •��e A I y■ z�. *` :Jft gg t t3 9 ? .1 { • II I I I ' .- 9 IL I!: I I a a a jJj{• ; I e I I Y 3 IT j, ; III ��t i -Al I g 11 r-- b r' rt 11•Ill It 1, w 4 i *Hi I °° --1'-ii 11 >s s` ' , g 1 � # *Hi !11 - l j { ` €fit • §, Ci '� it - a ! 4 I ! 5 ° I 1 1 t o It I 1 ! qPi; I g h e s I! I e,l �. I ¢s•O) °p 'W I. 2 !Ii I I 2, 1a4 a ,+; CO El ;:; –'— iR 111 , i I 1; 4"'"2111, 1g 1 ;10 +z.II o u 6 Ul k+ # i �i I q pa it i 4 U _8 1 !1 I p W CI 1 1 III b ,, IE • III I I i■ :=E t az$ e I t1 II I • I Rio"E 8 /i �3i e i1 W : ',:, 'i b it II I i Y�61 9 ! Y;� Y�, B 7 . 1{ 5` ;sl $18100 �di =F EGP 1 Q �� Is sIiiii :1?'3i44 1I4;i:Air$lill i o 'Ep ! II I e' i� ac.eeact, xg.l ;> II i! I I i 5. Q 9 .1 II II : qt 10 Ol3li3NYM If,, € ' I G 4 I d IA'c II I . � I I i' 6 a 1 ` I q ; € I IL _ I + ( 1 ! t l G4 As ; II I �I" I 3f 1 Mal III I'I I a ''1n' `' gggq j 1111�1, _ .�, X. +� h:ffl Ail g �€� ®st0 it $ 5!b 1)e ¶J13//'i a—a �..�. L 3nN3NY QiVENHOW 3,,33,-. - EXHIBIT F - - - - - - - . P167 nseU ir,rtt,AVAJOI01,N. COTP-Ott WO lit N■rld ONlaVUO ,i A CV i OWE VO 1431/311 1110d031 d OW.1.39111814%/2 MB ISM S2VIOH ONINNYVI SaNCH OWINVil ..""am, -rfinicBON00 ‘-.. i " 17.1 1A11■11131 NIIIM•11 MI ,r1 41.1.1.■=2 7,0,4 IIIIMINOMill S2RA,73 2.3.....07. ...,.............. Kflel > ..."'''...."''...3100V110 W10■74111ya Ill • ' 't.,1 t'. F.,' I .2 g -r. a ,. - -..51_..— i 12 7 i• -I_ ! u.. ' ?. ' -,': '2 1 • : --- ,-t' 1 . . 5.t.: . 0 ., ---• --.- •; 0:' `i f-• . .ii -,. 1 1-..1 i 1 5 ' i d .... '10 ----: .. - 1; .• .1 i! 11 i I 1111 .11 ti i V i' ' i -L-R--.1' •g . , I, ,,-• -.;" - r. 1 i 4 I '■ IS. - li ..• . „ 1 I ' s- ..+ — — . •...- ; 11 r -I nu , ... - li II . 1 :,. :- •° 7, ,..., , 1 4;1—h li it . ..,,, , 1 5 4' : r■ ; . .. , ., . 11 .rL 16 1414 i I 'ii _ J . • " -31 I . -.1 4, ■ t -7_, I E a i,• 44 i 1 - I IP; 1 ''.,- i •;•.1 5. % i . .1 1 F2—. Itt i II i — .I...., •— ii... . t.-,.1 - r i iri. t.. .1 ' 1 • ' L.7.•73 C t. r ••' r I 17- . -,r 1 ..-.'T - 1;1 i C•i , , I ' ■: ,.....t,t ?A.? .. r I 1 11 I • *1— —i 7:,. — I: 4 P168 tos. Liztk (-5$ / a l .h., 1"--t:';......• , .-- . i „II .10 0 .;:. . • ..: .' r, _ ; • -,, -,.• rt it :. — ! I :,, –..- .. .1 - 401; .. ._., 1 ,iiir 1,-. y r, ,„ ,_ __ .. _., h.9 7_ .., e., 2 g _., ;g I i ..-..a C NJ F5 CO E CO - MP ..... - . ?....!.1.... 2 ,',!'‘.:.,.,, ..,0- • LU Z , 0 cn UJ''.7 z• ',4 C.),-:- -- ci) < 0 4' ' •4.,,,,, -.,.. ,. # . rld 1.--- 0 0 1 t. tilj < I • I • • ,., ...ji , cf, --,1 r, g - v. -.4... _i < a • ... ; _, ,_, • < NI .= . l ,-.;, -, 4. . . -'"n... -..-:: N". D .. L .- xt.0, 4.!,.. 4$e „„. • ... i--- •••4.„ 1 ', ':. • ^ ,-7. . LU cr 2 . -- _ . 1.1 111 (....) . ,. . .... A, . . . •il 1111 .1' 0 % 0...644•"71440. i 1,1 4:4 4,_.,...t K AM 6 0 ,_____,-.4 ... 13$1 1 - -1. ,.-*" 4-: jtk , • ,L1,1, III ii (...) . I isl -f .-17; I C2 9rill k 1 . 1 v:i. . : EXHIBIT G • : .,....3. .. g,... ,.... ,,,, ..... 4.4:.'Kt V .*,..":,-, P169 .6Fri, (2z22 . 4 A ..,, No 2 7 I -!(..)0 Q Z 9 <-- Ir- I ..,.. . •, ,,, ar.sz .,r t c - n. ■7.2 .raz I II '1.::<:: ,.^Z '''''• =,,, € , ..... a i'" 0.—) "1 '''''qPi i I a R .:E_:.. I. ,1 0 t m. •. ; / 1 ___ a-- ---- • - . I III' II 1• ;''' _ _. _ 31 , 0 ,11 CNJ = al! Ilk ,,,' ...:1- , • - -- - - - I/ - I K' \<,— „ „– . —= mum., Fr.46.4011—i- i. '.. ' ,IWUNI AL kMlle ilior....- , —t- ...-- ••• IA _ mut , 1 ..J .Z6 Z • 0_ 0 a) ,_- . 0 a. 0 _ . < 0 w s I v., co .T. o Lo ,-..5 u ,„, >- _ < C a. — < NI 0 -= 03 ,,,r, 0 ,. • C a o 0 Z c al 03 an fr 2 < __I 0_ T,•••7 _ litml L mirspi 601„,...4.1- 11 50.1 ii .. ,, 1 , 1 .i ..,i 1. . .., . - •" 0 a A ■I , 0 -, 1 0 . u... - t• i-1—7. i: EP f:, 1 =MO 0 Z 0 0 LU • :-. V) 111111Yit 1 I i r..-7. 1111111.1111111•111 , '■ilIMINN.1.',"11= 11111 :11■?••••1 ,—. ,.■■4111-1/_ !Milli MIMI , nne 11111111 NE MIMI B.1 1-1'.." ----– 7 .4 1 § _ - s 1 E I 2 P170 p aA ?=W1 N '':?1��IIY 1':1�1�1'lll r imitr-imilk---A. .N�1; D p I 11 u 11111114 �o-r� , OL10 N§x \.1,1111 —.Li pp I.raI!Ifli!�:II p MERL: c r 0- .. . __... '-'m co 11:_=•x=- a 1 n'i z O.--_, U N a) 0 W J o I oa 3 C o I-1- .0 L c � QS Z Q J a- WWI I I I -,43 F I, ��9:iCEP ma' '1 iiiil wuuu� iii. iii iii: Elli[111 NU0UU : 11=- a CU air, , 1 4 4', El HIE' ii iii 5 Q ,J ii ii; i c -":" /MN= \ 1 .iii ifiiii�i�i54 \ iiii r■■■ ..ii..1.11111111 ( ' I ■■■_ 4 I1.1.dl \ [ ° r \� r ulI l ilM D 'I \ L1—P Y i R ^I R , Q P171 JU z Q-1 g!xN;a I v +� ww 0 2-II �I' W Doi -, 1 hvi, 5 pH < 3‹F.a Z co a d r O I Q 0 I INU?I�rI�Illu) u I I. TOME n LL ii°; ei 1 111 j idG'X1491, a �' — I IIII No ranH ET. I [I1 z co co ■■■ . .� 1 I r, co .... 1tttP11 ❑ � YtiO �ii I4 5i'VII IIIISIIII ■ I� �10, a,i i '454 I h' ' 43 i'i'i'i'i' milMim / .I"I IIC"MI J . ®® �= Q ®® z = °pi p U Q N 43 — C ®® ' ii4!i!i 1, Q 6 C 00 OOO W c 0 I ,I=I IMOOI Q J E co .■.. � � W j ii�ii1 0 . 1 � J QQ � c c CN o �' E.BZ' z Q G WHIM II oral L...I Q [ Orilinill..11 I ME II. 11,\ :1 4101 \ EMISI BEM \ -----.1 i ullllA ®® ■■11M ,4�;,r' /411!!:: •111 VIIIIIOIIINII i '��awl 1 nu ■■.■1 ■■■lc MEM. j CC a W It€MCM > W i :L gwo r,° • •< °* a °c"- l S° P W N ■ Y ■ m ■■m o zLLa°W° m °4us Z. `, 03.4 uWCa 4 s o,>�t� o J, u'�u�"o�rtUO3 ° —x nY a R-3 t� n K [It O O' c < i I o z E a i o[v' = <w,8 0 i o °I 8 i. R P172 u Z .,Zs, I Ill .6. �U g x_._53. . Z 7ogi W a� EMR p 3a�a O ID—_ a 401 a Q 1 cc HI>X1 og 11. 2 N co Da Z F cci Fs,-- AI = N =Aiwa€= C■ L �I - - --:III .■■, �■ ImaMEEEMI 0110 0101 kerleill mom nll :_:-OI: :_== o I I_m.=. . �I Q I < Q 0 z J E ml BI E :e- m ,,,■ i I_. =1:11.1 1. tL _ CO m Q v ! .... al_ J m () .C Q r C U=I .0•.9Z 7 C CCM �; < G. r r _ I EN= J II!!!! I!_-- 7 IliI ■ 1 r •_�===-"r of �M� -=sir r it_ r ec - .:= °-N III ZO p° S • L�I L 2 � M_sw IHflL 4a an 1 2°.- --4. 5 4 limm QaoguWO_ ME tl ( VV.) -g.1 . m- 045 R O n a 0 z,.- ■ C6 z O =O O p O s/ Q ,A VA.,«°u i J a tZ d ° a a l i" a mi r t e � -, 8 1 P173 Icj UZKy Q-z3a Jy l,Es Z QZyy? ■ °--,;. -,\ -7,* A N 8 4 4 2 i_±lu1ll0�nu.h. O '�' D p ; -- R, Ro ,_4 , _-oo z 00. LL (,) ICI. I r. \ e C:■. \I . ism — * ii., n . , 1.--ml, I I 1_-., m. )1E3 f \ 11 NLI ...v.J �� / ., ...... 1y tell - ICI !1��1' i� MiM o Fly ,I=.- .--1, ry =L Ism'II \I W 1=-.....-- .1 III Rill Q U N (D _ s C ��� 7 /f�i O w II f 2 \� LL I Q C7 W l a 0 N 0 6Z ri n�!`�driv L [ I i 1 7 Ws ~ I I::■I H I I I ,ldl I n—I I I y MIMI <,' ,'7,'. rN g (\ 1••• 1 oZ O o iii Y�<a .. to . --i. u ffi a ■O - y �11�i,w- p z m 6 03 o o l E61 QZ W^CQ 1 ro - o V_1,-Q2 5 �W'-��`�u t Z . oa�000 E ' u /, 'J. 5n aao , w t ' dm u ■ r u LL co3f.a _c� > R • s R P174 T,JaIN Jz.Ax J as y =wi 2-g1 S Qua- 3¢Ea sO r r Q ' :i i " ....I 8 a 1 Num. I p F. ,,reml 1 I il I I co c m LL . `\ f r U ■..... 'MIME u .■■■ MN ME 1 .Ell 1111 'y I — I __1 iii _I_I =1=1 1=1=1 =1=1 =1=1 ■■■ _M Q CD z o 4) il ' 'li CL 1.1.1 O ■■■ ■o I® E ■N• J- — Q L c Z U � cccal 1=1=1 ■. r Q \ 1 1 H . 3 \; 1-1-1 N i • 181.1 MEM ■ ■■ s u ,MEMO cc J Q W cc $ .A..■s; � ■■ .■■. um. 3a w W< E■n. E. U Ng' ■■■E' x� z� mow_ , n■■ r '' §.a O Ism! f. 'z a r O 'a Q O U N¢ 1 } 4 a zgmg°°�oa � o ' a. \ ∎--- !7' g \ � LL r z Z Z U 0 2 rj I • I A e I P175 z d a 5 _yzp. <-:,:i Iop - s'-',i N 511 2;0 < 6. 3<Ai 1,1:),..1 , - .:4 • . ,,fl ..- lu .:- _ MT - ,, C\I 0 - 111, ki.;± ,,,, , t: Li _-_ a,7. :;e:; .., ,,,/ y , k,, ,' ,. I 6E'-: .„.„ , . . . . -- ,' i 4 'VW 11 = _ -I- -- SE '1,- °" - - ;,'. 0 - Csl I to I ..., , ; ='UN . E .F...-= ._; . .-97.-.-' - - : ' 311 •-•.• 1 o - i .' ao C — C' t- =LEL I .0-.51 ,-,-, .- ...,.: = a.- MI ,4--A ::,z .........„ ilia J ,A1 1 o LL,52__ ,. .j ,Z6 z ..._ 1..1 < Lr._ I a co 0 < a_ o a) Ln — CD Ow 0 CO a UJ 0 E I *,-r- i < o s- (N < r C l.J } 0 0 < C Ca M M Z as < CC 2 _1 a_ _ -- --_____ T NI al Ng ff.d.ix iii-: G-. .. --el 7 1 "111 1 1 1 I ''.. 2 7, NM --',°-- =II = ; - 0 0 =a= 0 ; 0 L-= ., 0 .1c, 77 1 a4 - , 1 I. mom 0 0 __, ] 1 ___. z - , ,...._ .p. 0 = ' o 3 u..1 E, 0 0 t7 a cr) .t1 , 9, -...,..- . :1■1 ...■ -.. y. lail Il Id KW =i . 1 2 ■ ..* i4 I R P176 g IQ p. 9 UZ ii Q-as 1 1J Q:r l.b. 1 WrM Gam'_ 221E .(112 II L uA N :■ MI>< 11:•141 1 �D E Q A • ■ D l�� In I_ EPC' b o 069. 0 11111111"' ° U €�E - 1 i 03: , �II�9vl ao 1 WI wi .3 it ®r--i m o U 1. ��Ige: 1 N . ®O CV hI i' C ■ J�I C cq Vic=-E=!�' '■__�=_5o I ■■ �I ._ 1 , i,.........: i I�•I owl 1111P>>I OIL r r L I- CD ON o C LL c 03 N Q� 2 z Q J CL ■ � ■� 1 .o. GII!191t® 1=1=1 III7011 : ■ ISO: HUN I■■■■ NOCIDEI 1E1E1 j Iriii. KH . III ®� JRB8 ltj 1 Q 111111 ;x, ' i 1_-- o nu or10 11 Q :iii i N ::: 1; o00 N m ® ; C ii: '�;1S p l C Auk D HUH ► :::i -!, a MIME cm® I ..0 - S =1=1 1�V ..h5n„ .,' Y.. I�� mum- j ElE1 uu i fig u.. I u■■I ' a j ! I I 3 4, fli Ii °I 1 P P177 J Z Q-5 a Jy�� 1111111 . z ww Wx� o a�J 0,91 Z Q a a I° . a M,-1 r o L__ _ Q _1 A ._ - --- --- -- C::: . o J RR . . . __..... - 7 -■EIESIBISI Xo is EDUCT 1111 'oi!i!i, Z O u-)il3da;!li ::° , 000 p... ■■■■ 010 MEI 1 i I 11111 ,\ an:i■■■■I !mumII=E ®� MN inn !MEIN n iII�x ammo / net �Mill m.o : .., lissom!.. Q 4(rtmc 1 quiu �® Z i::i = i:::I f. O U C CD r::: cu _ W �loul W Q Oo .... QJ o = iiii l Fes—Q 0 CD M®I I N 0 .0 o C ®® \ Q Q L C Num OM ■■O \ ui 1 HHN4 N c M ECM \ :: :I .0 .ez z ¢ 2 I.... u., \ 6 HoI Nri, A . _ .... I II , ICI :::: I I•EH di IL..MINIM �_ . . : 1a z a 8 a a EJ iH?!I �; W o" ::::I sm�' ¢ °rs uryr.6 :6:g U 3 o m ,r nilXI1 x_z O 0 '7 Qols D�tumw U' w3 ../�I�. H a O V Z cLLs 6 y$3§oV° \ OH��HH' I'U�� < Q zzgo�?�3W°uu� J a"O^' io3smaf�6 .g.Lit 1 , JS w �� =1 0 s -1:1,1 P178 .,zd I 4a <-, - --=fl■■ °z =um I wo t Q �c01 .o-si Z a Fa Q p I d I 91111 C\1 o _I Li_ C L in7drill Hl>>4. a • MX.1 i g,_ X _ :■ ADC -11•M c0 aatboramf WA 14;1;;;; A) CV il� I_■q _ =■ l Ea r r O 1 (n I Q o N IA CD Q d E 1 I=■I =iI W m Q -J 1 NJ 3 .c U C 032 CC• \ J 1 i t N CL 7 II I V n 1=t I 9 - - .liKomL' 2- r-- —iii / Q_ O W o W o O Q o W43 0 i_ P-in OQO xm U ■' F A o ,I L —, i3"aLLu e - °i B I F P179 I0. s (:),z AZ 6-aa Ja ate' z c= 51 0 jug S Q J 41-.31 aa 1 Q LO Q ( N u! Q III iller 0\D _i.■(-4:1119 N 1. co ;i1 I z m i,/11%.--- IN'NUM I I t li Foil 11.11.111 / Enits L � w IIM HI■ = n It f. O O U J E _ lull 1. 0 al I Q v \ J CD I::■i. U N c NQ = � Z S .0-.6Z ' < c2 ,,1. O CL -�I �'I, /E:- /■ }-EE: I INN NE .- m c W z O ¢ x 4 V Nip"? Fx.os s`ao ii■� 58 fg C LL O c 3y O a ��■ z J� osgyo�a$e�ac� [� .." �a d0D r 8"°2o Boa' ' LL^ 5 x m r z o 3 v a s u i „,,, \! _ it ccN "S{ ,.....„ -\ m 7 U f 8 I g P180 S a J Z i A <-- 5: .6= t,, r '"1 ww .,_R (I nUig ,I=I=1 71. ) ,, . . 1111111111 .1t1E1 _p';; -H — 1=1=1 co 4 z° �° 4::: u, (■ : * $ 4 1=1_1 liii1l =1=1 I I � _ 1_1_1 �� 1=c1 s./ me No I . II Immo NMI I=1= Cr)=_ 1=1=1 ':::i mom. < N Min u■■ =1=1 , .I.I a- LU F 0 ~ ::::I C!, J E _rismuil I 111111 r 0 u.Q mom w 0 C u:■I - J z V I i i Q gc \ .e-.9z: J Q G CL 1=1=1 1111111111 n 1=I=1 .... ....1 /1 re..\� I -- I��' '� I 1=1= ELL .. .1 .... cc ::n < 1=1=I a U.1 z ¢ g,.gF,,,,, ' =4 ri z a 1IJI0 4/Pr #2,1 Q d A w Q c V ,N, ° g n'nu E°SO a N m �/ r�-_.� -' Z 3 3 rs 2S �r v s `I S 1 R P 1 8 1 'H <-g 116= RI ra rl,(a., 'At "-- ,,,.. ... — , II .... . , La-=..a It II- pit .a..37, la..,II • F.--7 . ., i Y • ia.. ' `:0: g 1 ° ,- , ... ,1.E ,' . II , ./ 0 X X , .: R R "f 0 LC) I-4 — I-- Cs.1 _ U- g- 1 , 0. NW 1 - ., '.4.441 (1-6 ,;, i o0 Mt NI ---- _ j I LL S7 I- i i i 1 — Cr) _ NM — - , I.a — — L :; .KZ- : FA ' •2 _n_ al 0 agt; I ra 1IN .-' INTA .“- - .... ..... ... H-. .Z6 Z ___I o O. a W LU I— 0 CD ,- LO ....... CID gl(1.51 c) z 1 Nj 3 .c .4 ET: tX co 0 c aj — 0 Z cT 2 co 0- — — — ..-j-m- a 0 ..= 0 ; I 2'3 al Oil II Sp ; : 2•,a ': s. WI 0 $ 0 --_, , • 0 eiffilti- ; a•c,.., . rj; t i■a., I.L.H , .:-..:;. F---a _l_ a a' i .. 11 CI = Z I`),:'i =,---7,' 'Mal 0 =MI'S] 1.1.1 C/) ,,,! '■■ = = a w.6 7 La, 1.... A 11 ,4 : ..=, 1mm Non= MAIO ' I = ..‘ I■C 11ll ...-.. . _ °I S 1 9 P182 Id P. Oz IN Q-a4 QJ F h micsi NV g '' LL""N JC Ca a144 CN t*1OI;jr,,,,,- 71 Idl =D I �D D Dr-Ryl 0) m -® I ith i I CTi 1111 MEW I. - co I :ii P 1� M co - IN�III VJ 'lull ii: !!! [im. ow m. N. ,:. ��I al u. i r �. J V z 0 Q U LI• J Q w �- J E _ OQ ° c � co m CC 2 z Q J a- 1. ft Am I ,i .... Iluu,1,:111, IBM •ii■■ ' a F \s L r ' o 0 ..- 0 r--i� r, \ \\ rc j c 0 'Ism I=1 I ram 1 • ....,; II __�• ..IN I,• ...wipe Je ■■■■ .. M imam ..N:iiJyyliS IEI_ I_I_I z 1 EEC MB i Liti \\1 i4�w R °1 S II R P183 s J Z LA ,f' Q-3 a i7^ 2 w a Q ` �C1 k' Q wu,- x_a Z 2= 8 ��� V 0 Q�ui� J_ti Z 3a A a Q . 0 M a I rs p IN Q u. i ill imil: Kau ig EtfiZ FEB I . E1i N tNET II co Z I n 0 m :en o00 i LL N :::: o00 y ■ AEI 1411 ... ih 101,11 1 Elm PH En rn rn hl110J,i �I ...: ...�jiAi4L�Ii iii =I EOM M1111140ililgij■■•I' ..�� .R��: I yi1i IM ME ..: !NiiS�iiiiiN 1 .. I i yy4 fyyMdfi ■■■■ :Id�!yii .0 i l— 1004411 / / limmui z ::::�' H l' L J E _ MOM 2 �r n°�I f N ( in J L C ::u' c N ■■ l... 1 z .ez= Q:=== CL MOM. EE \\-----Rvor iilir moll . �d�i� .: ' . f NeddM! iv \ INFI.„ ,„ ,,,!..„ , ,c,„ „, ,, , _< I IL o:: w °�� ��o � :161�ii6 Cl_L� �w 3 w m ...m 3 o� c � H! g • tV<o<°w _ "'a�3 _t n V"�GU' 0a. 4(,a \ l g M eg o° 800-1 d N a000uau m ' 4 U. o _1 p k s .a 8 I R �LP184 , -a'3. �"�e as 3 N. O vI,—d 0 Qud Q 3¢Aa A II Q J �i MI csi Za 4 t 0 ET co O CO I LL 1 „nm• 1,4 ANIMI �_ I —1 WIi I- �_' 1I Ail MI IM CIS __ C ��� O o N IBM =III Q 1—Mil CD Q E _ ZW o O ■ ¢ w � J Q a u_ 2 1 } J i , rr m Q L Cr CO 2 � I I , raill L1.I CC \Gs- G li5 \E1 I j! I ° W o F� ;m =En ? 2 z:a;1 el_MIN_ =1;, o a x w a W O_w U w'-' , 2 ■ ■ Z LL a Q !: Hfl a r r 2 Q¢ il 8 1 R P185 4Za h 0 � II 0 f_m',- H Z 3Q a AI a cr) I .9-s" o 1' I Q E Dora I!::�I: _,aa 4 • > ,� J re- - D�_=�a� o co II I �I ! u N tU 4r1 IN./ .1,.. j IT, /7 . 1.111i J NH HA 0111 lair i -1..-.---=-..-..-1 Pi!!! Alti= 11111111 [1:E1 i p IL-ICI.� \}-�-�--.. w ;r EC �- _ 11 Q g E (I( I ¢ ::EN 1—w a U J E _ imilm Lill •41 t%l I:. r, Q o c D ► [ ..� z cas i \ L. I • .9-.6Z= Q Q 2 fi CL OM fit� fit V .. . L_____I Q Al MI —1 <_.— ' 1 CI L(.2 _MOW O a d u 0 � J - -' '€Q•t uz �o��a i m o 0Q U I; CC it d °1 8 P186 Q-:SSa. Jy u 11= Q3.Fi d fcit 2=fit Quoi J 3 z k Z I Q 'ma 4E MEN 1' 1_1_1 ,,4 R MINN F \i F . p Cl)1ii el t l® j LL W`a RM� ' __ 1-1_1 1=1-1 ....I 1-1-1 mmul No Elm'..E. .... 'l u..[ ::: I I::::1 1==1 1E1_1 1=t=1 Ul/ C I I . =mom _ I V...l - Q N :U.. m ac C :::il 1.1°I a LL o 0 :... J E _ _ ..... v __m. I_1_1 Q N v C ■.. co 0 C ..i. c co 1J=1 i��n :EMI J ¢ G .L-AZ' CL 1 1=1 ,I:::il ,1 f /Z =101 , \--'Mal 1 minim 1 imat[ =1=1 :::: moms \,11 z\ — ki.,\ .... ..... 1_1_1 J..■t ■■.. E` 9 Q ��::I Q ° , Pals ■... . oQ ::::� mow II .1 Ot-Vq.'l INN 2 °m o d 6 441 G$ `O k= r < Figi 8 JG1PJ g —<--- cc i ,f,- cl ■ W H �g &� R P187 uAR Q-3a I 3/g zup , :Or Z CI '�at . Q ¢Ra '��� ---'� . Q r L 0 r— b Z Z W "a ��« ' 0 I ��� OJ ■�i■ u_ / : . - 0 4 s •■■ — . ,■ • -- o R mac®c= o— = N -'� co co cc w N .IEIEI '■■■E■ ::.■ ■■ ■ i :mil ,M MN I 'MOW ■■■� Iy i \ I\ ,F_LMI z cz5 0 E,_I : : [ N > < g E ME w o °i- J�E i®I 1- J Q U 0, . 'cowl u.MUM z - s al \C,\ .... EN NM z inn w C-1 i \, MIL=-1 n■■ ]EMU V ,MO 1 iiu i P188 1Um UZ Q-as 5.1. <As WF S,L 0 �c 0 Z 3aQs W O N 1s Z ::._II` Q e W n:'ah I a — � �'' OO cc 1 MSS.' , Silk 0 I JIM ED MB 1 u------ C :1:: -- ■.:�.pyl — - o o ,.■■■■ -.10-411111 tl■■ l c�— ,11 1111 rfil rail cc NHEI c N IN�a1� e, TI1olu i i �.... EI II El a nm „,;,Imo i i!I illl4l l fly.9��1111[I rin.--,---....1 ■ �`� IIIH 1 11 �I I I z ,`,I�� IIIIIIIII ■■■.I ' CI 'mnm �:1 �um`nur t= I fj O��7 U. V° iii ''ii�iii ��_ CL M :�i i�i�i'�' ®® z woi 4.;ii; I■A I■■■■y�i;di4;p ■t®■■5L!�;i 1��'""5;i . 111.11.I l�'iii :.... •u� y}' I11E1 ^li�ii ii \ �.... I CiiC,l ■.. ■.■. ' ihal nnn nu n ■■ Id It uv,mi 'U.. 1MM. :Hi CC w^ CC o 2 a r =MI 1■■■>� a ' ■■ ■ � I I■■n� 6 $ °rc MINE ,l■.■■ t ' _. ,_ . ■ u■■� U i w –. f. - -o-i . –iF gxioo W ,scf ...m. .■ QO no9 J I I' ugfLa ! lm I" u.7 xO aa3uaaEOm LLn H :o O O6 jai * ac;§ 3 0 0 a 2 ‘‘','.1 .w g o LLti 3 a ..- i Ri I g 77._. ._._711._W._.�.00760117....111.111...70 1.1..111...,.._.ml,.__.__AIM*le....�ar,.� _._...ewe.._ - 189 S3WOHONINNVW....M.... t:.-; :.... �� PNY1d 3dY7SONY1 . ,,..,.,'..t.--.. �� _ ,'aim='P 11YM AEIYNIWI13Nd v.1 nP4011VJR)OIOMI i1.1.LW1LL .x.r..unxxsr '- a s wow I■mmEN■m } itQ =41 ill ill 3f1N3AV VNOWVId - }' M. • i E f }k 111. 11.° i .6-,a a ;. �0, : _` - : !} a E : } a if 5_ 1 °11, :II �g if if s 1 11 Fi 1: I I/4:it ,rt tfi I * 1; ill Ell i i J 1 II, r If 11 d If 1s Al I P 1t N-115 .irom. ...' ' :' .E i; tiles z I i; I ° If 1�g ii s J III ? �N E�1i G. J $ 11 9$ is a 11 !1 �!!i t�F If i . hlr� 4i s i5 ass sss ss 11ig... �l' �����, 5 j i '1M1� Al°rt 43 41,1 IOW l 11i Ili r"tl O J�1• ill/PUN_ e i 4 h i Man "! aw°' =a Ilan 4 , "" ki+ ii!" $`! i # �____:_ Sig I g !A ili ---- a 1.1J'� ii�,L l . iii 4 ii 1 ; X11 ! 1,i ul, .j iE!.1 11 11 :B !lb'MVO jil W.r " !� na;; 4 1-1p. i e _l!ii ii.�¢ 3 i ! 1 IjI: ; i 0 aj 1 ;< ° f q i i• 1 F � � �.; 40- • l .1 z ; ;PLOD N 3 i gill Iii 111 311 III -Oil IS, i1 `\I .li wJ 3 i� s r . . . o e D II®� i t *fly ��1— �' lie 1 iimml e '114 `1 • PI 4 a1 W g, ill` ii il Vim (ii. a °ds !WV W 11��11i II iii Q9 E� �u1 1 fit,] r � , .'• ll ``11!1 • • • 1 tl¢.)O`i ,;oo0 L I ��!IL: ili(e i C' 1,�r i< IJ� 1. I � iii 1•�j _ill E`pp����+ - �� t 45 I�:D`J 11 ; ! 4� 1i[iIEI_ � : si j i is I:1 .q !gf :611;g443,1111\r�il 1 ..�1..� Il� � 3s i1 ;�� hi 5 9 $ T `t' 000* ill' 411 if�1 ;i3 g Tr TT �vgo2 iB 'jj ������ �? �� 5 O6:10:41 �I� • g{� I��•-7rJj1� •�'�� �� Iii .71 � 1 11 '4%�� !4 IOWA; YI_f_. 1 . to 4I di ! c'- `QED Rd:iE0 e. r/1 1l* 9 !II L, i a $CD ` Ali; +la n 1L y , 4yy'1�� 's �'• .pia � i - _ � JII ii E 3 ° G .°o il! o o Ooo 1 I� 470 3f1NAV mveiHaav AJ •-!'!!!! Oq Pe- li iu (0 0 1$ 43 Cli EXHIBIT H P190 Neighborhood Meeting -----� Tuesday, April 08, 2014 4/8/2014 6:00p.m. Tentative Tract No, 18912 46 SFR 7074 Ramona Avenue ' Rancho Cucamonga Pale 1 Address Phone No. Print Nam- Sign 1 r !� t� .�1� .t /�' 4 I'�i �:. , ,c3/1 4-4 `� / Le.r' 2 IIMEIMINEMEI" 3 9;Lt.7 MIMINIONMENka.„ 4 , '1 S (J k.Dr. X09 cicf'1-03(,i, ' won„A, �� c f � 5 703 9 A/401 , f'!, qD9 5467 2t 741, ep ..r &air Gam' /-i 6 • 3 .• _G{.IV ♦I�1/ '• r 7 . _ . ” . , D ! •2 / r E±, g.. • 8 Ion (4eL1)tcn RI. . 909 5I3-733y IN -(3, am. !`L.4. 9 1995- Newiviu 191 I 5.111 µ • cz- i 10 `re c0e5Vtit.0 169 %,a t r,04v4Q-( c-S 1 1 re-." ". "Wr_t d—r3 Ana ? Age/ H/c-t-i 12 • - f_ .i 1-- �I 154 _ 71 • •`W. 13 70a 60 2 14 7do2747-l/43 y/ri. 9O9'1S1-0,31 '1 / L / 15 ?03`'f./A, cr 4 ct cr gap, J97- gY1)-- M4I o 16 VloA Board alitior 17 18 19 20 21 22 EXHIBIT I-1 P191 Neighborhood Meeting 4/8/2014 Tuesday, April 08, 2014 8:00p.m. Tentative Tract No. 18912 46 SFR 7074 Ramona Avenue Page 1 Rancho Cucamonga Address 1 Phone No. Print Name 1 Sign 1 7y. (R w_ 4, . - it 4 6 r 111MAIMINI w ,6 to 1111 r n • �.. .�r . . • • ` t'7b 4 70 85 � 101-w.9,1-1)66 l,lla.►-vrn.Roth - �1 r 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 23 24 P192 MANNtN:G] HOME'S: July 16, 2014 Mr. Mike Smith _ Associate.Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive. Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 Subject: Tract 18912 Summary of Neighborhood Meeting held on 4/8/14 Dear Mr. Smith: On April 8, 2014 Manning Homes held a neighborhood meeting at Deer Canyon.Elementary School at 6pm to present the proposed development of 46 single family homes at 7074 Ramona Ave. Other than the homeowners and other attendees shown on the sign-in sheet,.Craig Kozma, Jim Manning, and Jackie Manning were present representing Manning Homes, Mike Smith representing the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, and Julie Frasure representing the City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department. Just prior to the meeting, it was discovered that there was an error in the printing of the mailing labels which were used to mail out notices of the meeting (to the 660' radius from the project site). Once i this error was recognized, Manning Homes announced to the attendees that an error was made in the noticing and the neighborhood meeting would need to be rescheduled. However, since there were approximately 15-20 people in attendance (see sign-in sheet), Manning Homes decided to proceed with an "informal" presentation even though it was understood that another meeting would be rescheduled. The majority of people in attendance of this meeting were from "The Neighborhood", which is a homeowners association representing 111 single family homes directly North of the proposed development. Upon completion of the presentation, Manning Homes conducted a question and answer session from the audience. Below is a list of issues discussed: • The proposed street layout for new development and its connection to the Newton Place stub street was by far the issue of most concern and discussion during the question and answer session.. • The impacts of increased traffic from the new development on the 8 existing houses on the South side of Newton Pl. due to the street connection. The South side of Newton PI. currently has 8 homes on a reduced radius cul-de-sac (stub street). The homeowners currently living on this street had concerns about the increased car traffic, and safety for themselves and their children in the street. • There was discussion about the impacts of increased vehicle traffic at the intersection of Camden PI. and Archibald Ave_ due to the street connection. Attendees said there is already PCgllig EXHIBIT 1. 2 ',, I Newport Beach CA 92660 1 111 949.250 4200 I FAX 949250.9008 I WEB snvw rrenninpiremes.mm P193 Mr. Mike Smith July 16, 2014 Page 2 of 2 "stacking" and backup issues at the intersection during morning peak hours. Asked if traffic studies have been completed or would be required. • There were concerns about increased traffic (in general) to "The Neighborhood" due to the. street connection. Discussions about increased traffic throughout "The Neighborhood" and discussions about likely traffic patterns and there affect on the existing streets. • Discussions and concerns about "cut-through" traffic on the newly proposed street and its impacts on the existing neighborhood due to the street connection.- - -- -- - • There was discussion about inadequate, or improper fire access in the past with the street design when turning from Camden Pl. south onto Newton Pl. Residents told of a time when there was a fire and the fire truck did not pull down Newton Pl. • Concerns about future homeowners in the proposed development using the private facilities (ie. pool and park)within the Neighborhood. With the proposed street connection there were concerns about pedestrian access to the private facilities without permission. • There were lengthy discussions about alternate street designs. Alternate street designs discussed were 1) A direct through street to Archibald, therefore not connecting to Newton PL 2) A single cul-de-sac design off Ramona. with EVA out to Archibald or Newton PI. 3) a double cul-de-sac off Ramona and La Vine. The feasibility and fire access of the alternate designs were discussed in detail. • Discussion of the Pacific Electric Bike Trail. Questions whether there would.be-a pedestrian connection from the proposed development. • Discussion of the improvements and widening on Ramona: Concerns of pedestrian safety and speed limits of cars traveling North and South on Ramona. • Discussion of the trees on site. Removal and replacement of the Eucalyptus windrow and other trees on the site. • Discussion of timing of construction. Work hours. Phasing. Impacts of construction noise. Noise and rodent impacts during demo,clearing, and grading. • Discussion of some existing problems on the site. Break-in's at home, overgrown trees, and homeless camps on site. • Discussion of expected price range for new homes. All the above items were addressed and answered as best as possible by Manning. Homes, Mike Smith, and Julie Erasure. At the conclusion of the question and answer session, Manning Homes announced that another meeting would be scheduled at the same location in the near future and the surrounding homeowners within 660' of the project site would receive a notice in the mail at least 2 weeks in advance. Maiming Homes also indicated it would have additional discussions with the City prior to the next meeting regarding the street design. Manning Homes also agreed to bring other site studies which were done with alternate street layouts to show at the next meeting. Sincerely, fleaf5—... Craig Project Manager- Manning Homes P194 was,V3 OY3e 1 ON 1.331iLB NOW MS UM W ��-r S2WOH ONINNVIN NV-Id Sus O1 Y.L3O a i ��y,� neet nM.11:rw 3nurw3l '� g f� e Cc 9 O a un-w''''''s 31� SKRI.3 MV1d 173fWd SiN31NOJ "AMMO a 1 $, MI COMMA Al ��\. �� ;s 4 3 1 1 k1� s k: ■1l■■■■r■ si [ y t i : ..� ; a i§s jai a [a i ■in■E�1!!■•*i ___� �� -a-� a - - 11 �a Illy 1111 la Fig„firowl.,...navi,k7.1 -,„„\ • 0.--49---..:...- ® R f 11 1 R k�11 i I ri I a Y PI : dihi r r kp k5[ i of a- �CV w I T ~ �« IL �1��� � i � oliy�seSyiQDS MU k �.'Lil I isii31BA9 .1 ii1 X11. �1j [ 1 1�1I '{ a eke .r a t x e k k 'a I I " a o a��i�l IlL.,-nui. _R � � I 0 _ 1 r __,_.�w , e I. o t�fl Z ""-•IU �iFiritL i I' i i T! ! P 1 U O y It Q W _._,��ruma GTr t l l 1 II f lh • 3 x 3 3 i 0 i 3 t:..i a a x a z z is 27 g `IMi� i �� � �� �$gh ,2- W O —1 ( 4 f , II 1_ .IIII1I ..1i I.— m II Q s i Rte,, l► yip --t 1I I u iiunninnnnhiiIIIIL.:� i if 6 o iva W �t ;; w i . .`7: ` , 11IIII II I1 �I o I - _T�° 16L___:...,_.....1..._ o I�I�IIIIII�IIIIIIIIIIIIIII I — "i 1 r 9N I ilh !- 5 -_ __, , Q _ Ems, ;,ter= r s ....r.--anti lig,v_z_,. . .i e .H nig " , II i I.- J... 1 1 1 1 1 I_I,: . Z Q 1 1!�_�. i 1 LU , ,�:� I re.r a j I II 1111.1 1 1 I — t. VIII Milli I 1111111 . � —=ill } ;!s-tot Ni ______ r iii:i '. MI i ilIl in R ,j'rq� 5 IA 2 fitiAllite• Still■ 'i L � ''.3 ' i!r11 o: ••• II _+,.."1 ' -„ J pegii3h9 !k 11 4. •EXHIBIT 1 -3 3N3AY a1_4, NI P195 1 co co if / i' 'Iiflpp l� . •a W� H E 1 Q r 0 i■ tfig::I oil. 11$7 ... \. •i ? 14 466 C -4,,, it.., ■ \%Atilt\Alp II >C *4 . , Z A o , . y CO Q r �' Cr C 111111 . g m N r 6 J. O T tL m A m .+Z F7 F- J a W. vi -V N 0 m k I �� . r N Y� 4 Oao o ∎ % . •' Ems- S M a, g, • a g Cr °c I-dj ; uo J• J q. _ _ _A � BEY ccc To , % `�'1 i t 2 > o °v �. a �� �J ? Z n ' r 0- to J M •D 3 CC U II N el < u1 f` r N to O 10 m t` m Ot C a oK s pc Vliiy EXHIBIT J- I P196 S • ', N 1 1 m . y v t� a8 a rn . 1 . 1` , 1ag ,, ' • I � . ' a3y ,. , .11Fr a 4 a Z 11 N . .7., i a 2 co I 3 C 1 ' t 0 .. a ‘- 4 -Is 1 4. C7 w CD 40 03 Ill FUsuw g @r che o c J, M K ---a . 4 1 �, t q 4 (r N � 1 $ a °; Ws ro 6 D t�rlj �a . ..• pp •L O ° ' nJ w A '. d M - � .- Et 2 a' iIr e-a` /p ate-- r CO n' L". • a 0 N- W to N- m 0) O N co V' N CO N- c0 0) O O^ a r r e- r 04 N N N N 04 04 N N N f0) M P197 co o tan E a o d N 4`; OI NI, \1r11 1 Lb r 1 o Z4j v c { a 's..... 4 f ;; co n I- o m f "al C4 r s J —L� N Z y L W or.' C, fl -a c M "d .n M i P198 , MANNING,, HOMES-2 i July 16, 2014 Mr. Mike Smith _ _ _ _ Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 Subject: Tract 18912 Summary of Neighborhood Meeting held on 4/29/14 Dear Mr. Smith: On April 29, 2014 Manning Homes held a neighborhood meeting at Deer Canyon Elementary School at 6pm to present the proposed development of 45 single family homes at 7074 Ramona Ave. There were approximately 33 people in attendance for this meeting (see sign-in sheet). Other than the homeowners and other attendees present, Craig Kozma and Jim Manning were present representing Manning Homes, Mike Smith representing the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, Willie Valbuena, Betty Miller, Craig Cruz representing the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department, and Rob Ball representing the City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department. This was the first "official" neighborhood meeting since the prior meeting on April 8th was not property noticed due to a error in the mailing labels. All residences within 660' of the site were noticed by mail at least 2 weeks prior to this meeting. Between the first meeting held on April 8th and the second held on April 29th, various meetings were held between Manning Homes and the City of Rancho Cucamonga to discuss alternate street designs for the proposed development. It was determined just prior to the neighborhood meeting on April 29th, that a street design with a single cul-de-sac connecting only off Ramona with and EVA out to Archibald would be acceptable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning, Engineering, and Fire Departments and to Manning Homes. This change in.street design also changed the number of lots on the site from 46 to 45. However, due to time constraints, at the time of the meeting Manning Homes only had a rough conceptual (hand drawn) site plan showing the revised cul-de-sac street design with the EVA out to Archibald. Manning Homes decided to proceed with the neighborhood meeting on the 29th and present the revised conceptual site plan showing the cul-de-sac off Ramona and EVA out to Archibald. Early during the presentation, Maiming Homes indicated to the attendees that a third neighborhood meeting would be held in the near future to present a "final" site plan prepared by an engineer with correct dimensions and house plotting. Generally speaking, the revised site plan with the new street design was well received by the surrounding neighbors. Upon completion of the presentation, Manning Homes conducted a question peV/3`�and answer session from the audience. Below is a list of issues discussed: u m t cw n:,.i. cn ' Newport Beach CA 92660 I FEL 949.250.4200 I FAX 949.250.9008 I WEB www.mcnninghomes.cnm EXHIBIT J- Z P199 Mr. Mike Smith. July 16, 2014 Paget of 2. • Some neighbors off Ramona and La Vine were concerned about the cul-de-sac design and the traffic impacts on Ramona. Now that all residences in proposed development would be using Ramona Ave. Them were discussions about alternate street designs and. tire acccss. Alternate street designs discussed were 1) A direct through street to Archibald, no connecting to Newton Pl. 2)Connecting with a through street to Newton Pl:'(the previous design) • Discussion of the Pacific Electric Bike Trail. Questions whether there would be a pedestrian connection from the proposed development. • Discussion of the improvements and widening on Ramona. Concerns of pedestrian safety and speed limits of cars traveling North and South on Ramona. • Discussions of the pedestrian safety crossing across Ramona.. Discussions of a possibility of a traffic signal or stop sign to he installed either at La Vine or the Pacific Electric Bike Trail crossing. • Discussions of storm drain improvements and widening.of Ramona. Impacts and timing of construction. • Discussion of the trees on site. Removal and replacement of the Eucalyptus windrow and other trees on the site. • Discussion of impact on schools. Which schools will the future residences'children attend. • Discussion of timing of construction. Work hours. Phasing. Impacts of construction noise.. Noise and rodent impacts during demo, clearing, and grading. • Discussion of some existing problems on the site. Break-in's at home, overgrown trees, and homeless camps on site. • Discussion of sizes and expected price range for new homes. • Discussion of noticing procedure required by the City. Wanted more widely noticed or by a method other than mailers. All the above items were addressed and answered as best as possible by Manning Homes and the City of Rancho Cucamonga staff. At the conclusion of the question and answer session,Manning Homes announced that another meeting would be scheduled at the same location in the near future and the surrounding homeowners within 660' of the project site would receive a notice in the mail at least 2 weeks in advance. Manning Homes indicated that at this next meeting they would present the "final" engineered site plan showing the cul-de-sac street design with EVA out to Archibald, dimensioned and showing more detail. Sincerely, Cr Proj- r- Manning Homes • . .-� �..._ I P200 1 t. dp 1, -1 . i 3p :111;4 01° 1 I. 1 i . :: 1 i 1 t0 ! 1 ! 1L f 3 , 1-! i , r , ,.-..,„,4. r* ,z ;<:;, 6 1 ,.y„, s"9 sue;. ..",`.,,:',',',...:"....'....• ,` �1i i 1 ! t I,, I Pc g i, ii EXHIBIT J-3 P201 ■ eat .$ °N 1 kkii. a u rE 1. j , ; it ' /is 71 Skim sass_ \\I .:2; -ri 7:. 4; Uri- :I_v 0 _ Nil_ ._ _ .. co •v o eTe a ' _ w , d 9 - I a 1: ;11.1_ _i 6' N d 1E W'Q r 0 ,0 N : s- L t a E d tr i re t. El li Z. a > s m r c �- m m z f- 0 d , F. m P p a tNI o a .' 7 e: : 4,t 'St • • $ � C A. L ocn - ry � � V C Ca PC SlllG IL_ P o EXHIBIT K-I . �r r `."‘• O al r N co Lo o n t0 W O r N m 7 10 P202 ' _ M ,4N Ni July 16, 2014 Mr. Mike Smith Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 Subject: Tract 18912 Summary of Neighborhood Meeting held on 5/29/14 Dear Mr. Smith: On May 29,2014 Manning Homes held a neighborhood meeting at Deer Canyon Elementary School at 6pm to present the proposed development of 45 single family homes at 7074 Ramona Ave. There were approximately 13 people in attendance for this meeting (see sign-in sheet). Other than the homeowners and other attendees present, Craig Kozma, Jim Manning, Anne Marie Kane, and Jackie. Manning were present. representing Manning Homes, Mike Smith representing the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department;Willie Valbuena,Betty Miller, Craig Cruz representing the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department, and Rob Ball representing the City of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department. During the previous neighborhood meeting held on April 29th Manning Homes presented at 45 lot site plan showing a revised Street design with a single cul-de-sac off Ramona with and EVA out to Archibald. Due to time constraints, the site plan presented at the April 29th meeting was conceptual, hand drawn, and lacked proper detail. It was therefore communicated at the April 29th meeting, that another meeting would be held to present the "final" engineered plan, showing dimensions and proper detail. The meeting held on May 29th Manning Homes presented the final plan. Upon completion of the presentation, Manning Homes conducted a question and answer session from the audience. Below is a list of issues discussed: • Discussion of the Pacific Electric Bike Trail. Questions whether there would be a pedestrian connection from the proposed development. • Discussion about the proposed improvements on Ramona. Questions on storm drain improvements and removal of the open culverts which are currently located at the crossing of the Pacific Electric Bike trail. What would the sidewalks look like on Ramona. • Discussion of the improvements and widening on Ramona. Concerns of pedestrian safety and speed limits of cars traveling North and South on Ramona. • Discussions of the pedestrian safety crossing across Ramona. Discussions of a possibility of a traffic signal or stop sign to be installed either at La Vine or the Pacific Electric Bike Trail crossing. • i c,,■!„ 150 I Newport Beach CA 92660 I FEl 949.250.4200 I FAX 944.250 9009 I NJEA www.mannin©hames.com EXHIBIT K-2 P203 Mr. Mike Smith July 16,2014 Page 2of2 • Discussions of storm drain improvements and widening of Ramona. Impacts and timing of. construction. Traffic delays on Ramona. Possible shut off of utilities. • Discussion of construction traffic and work hours. Discussed how the project would be phased and limit construction workers to park vehicles on-site. • Discussion of the trees on site. Removal and replacement of the Eucalyptus windrow and other trees on the site. Replacement with different species of Eucalyptus in the rear yards of Lots 26=45. New trees will be low maintenance and good screening trees. ---- -- • Discussion of timing of construction. Work hours. Phasing. Impacts of construction noise. Noise and rodent impacts during demo,clearing, and grading. • Discussion of some existing problems on the site. Break-in's at home, overgrown trees, and homeless camps on site. • Discussion of sizes and expected price range for new homes. All the above items were addressed and answered as best as possible by Manning.Homes and the City of Rancho Cucamonga staff- Manning Homes provided business cards and contact information if any attendees had questions or concerns in the future. Manning Homes received approximately 20 letters of support for the development from residents in the surrounding neighborhoods. Sincerely, Craig ''�0 Project Manager- Manning Homes P204 O MVD 10171/00111 °` 01 MM." SJVIOH ONINNV 1 3ua�1v�o s 3 _ § - .al w.:w1 ITb. 'NI.:MI A Q W �•.......... � I CC . n ••■•• • ••• MINN, .v .vro.e su131A103 Y.wa V f I aaM _ III ! _y i 11 I {i II I . S t t _ 1 yiR�R 1.-. lita - - • -1-/--r • .-.; , .��I !0!� li ________I ---- "4"" .( —1— i . vita Mil I s�� n ' 1 /tr i te —�.=-- =•-_p7f. �._—. ��s.1 i j I - 1 if i j _ i 1: : Cg.a !t ..'i- i f � _ '_ . rc�ons._. a i g 'IY gpp 1: 1� } 11 - r •i j �' 3f t! 2, 414 t.14 i= yt(qiti Iltimi ..41:. : N nit trill . , 1 la % Itedi -' ' l 1 '11 ost— III 01 ":Ii`ic l! t° i Oil N :' II •• 1liil Ilia t,lEf t Illil IIf, ;� li 11 ' ' f, 14 •11 :I..T I ' 11 i g $ CO Ii2. .111 11Ip`'r-•• F I .1 3 I' a ' i i i i g - Iii! W 44111 It s :1� 11 i ; iy47ig 1$F/ � 1l 'e: 1i • '11;11 �- { t • Lli III . f I'.j a :.""0.l F Ka� 1;•1:6' 1 . ,III �I ,- I., ( 1 t r (I � ; o f �� } iii !I y II , 1 1 I . ,,;;i1 ,;,,1, Il,, i is Z LL 'I k E I� .�, if.r* II' , 11 ; - • I a#. t li .. milli . •I 3 F Q`mni 0 o � t ° ~ ,t ali -.:j1r ', ' I ill ,i .� _ ; fA - ■ - w 4-SS u Z ill t 5 ��■ -ice I 12 .. act > n a: ■ am p I nh ,, 1 - O o I�" il�r r .r III III' IL ill s a - e III a ~;I— r, of l..I I ::::::::: s'..: I� S(�e ff WII 0 I ,1'1, 11T , ?t °1 1 •-4II�s il�.� z I i Me .r11 111 _rr� .t� c 1 1 I� I --` 11111�j1y�y��r Ila W 1 P .I! i ttvr� IICi I :,I a .�1 'r yl.w w�1�n1111 R { 11 III I I s „ - Q 'ii l Ali, j is]11I1f1 I1lIu I i I- ; --- `Il � Ili..^ % I ; I li , Nn 1 111;111111# 1J 413:i7HYM --.-11 j nY i 1 ' �rl I��iII I I— Ili ; I' 111111 16 , ►I , 1r i� Ilse i 1 Wis 11 1 IM MO I 1 1 • 9 4.12+�/- 11 1 ,1 C ti � ilk_ i 1 !.: I ill -,2131- J n !� I 1It .I II . _ff. ig.i LI,- 4 til , , 1 . Peg/� /4 _ -._ .._ ati ,r_.i P;d tar . it �,T 1t i w -7 C .44A EXHIBIT K-3 .5 3^43V �--� t t P205 MANNING HOMES CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA February 19, 2014 FEB 2 0 2CA RECEIVED - PLANNING Mr. Mike Smith Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Subject: Tentative Tract Map 18912 Submittal, 7074 Ramona Avenue Dear Mr. Smith: Manning Homes is pleased to present justification in support of the proposal to develop a 46-unit single-family detached subdivision (Tentative Tract Map 18912) on a 6.82± acre parcel of land located between Ramona and Archibald Avenues immediately North of the Pacific Electric Bike Trail. Existing Site Conditions The parcel has an agricultural history and has been highly disturbed from its natural state (Hamilton Biological, 2014). Along the Northerly boundary of the site there is a fragmented Eucalyptus windrow which is in declining health, possibly due to the construction of a block wall in the root zone of the trees (Bonterra, 2014). Several trees that would have made up the windrow have also fallen or been removed at some point in the past (Bonterra, 2014). Across the remainder of the site are dead or declining fruit/citrus trees and coast live oak trees, which have been cut at the stump in the past and have since re-sprouted (Bonterra, 2014). There is a vacant single family home (7074 Ramona Ave.) on the site which appears on the "Local Inventory of Historic Resources" list complete by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. On the list, the property was assigned a California Historic Resources code of 6Z, which states: "Found ineligible for NR (National Register), CR (California Register), or local designation through survey evaluation" (Rancho Cucamonga, 2011 / Bonterra, 2014). A Cultural Resource Assessment was completed for the property and no significant archaeological, historical, or paleontological resources were discovered (Bonterra, 2014). The entire parcel will be cleared prior to the development of the subdivision. Mitigation measures will be implemented to preserve paleontological, historical, or archaeological resources which may be discovered during grading. All trees will removed per the requirements of the Biological Assessment (Hamilton Biological, 2014) and will be replaced per the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Tree Replacement Policy including new Eucalyptus trees along the Northerly boundary. pe wispy EXHIBITL lewport Beach CA 92660 I TEL 949.250.4200 I FAX 949.250.9008 I WEB www.manninghomes.com P206 Mr. Mike Smith February, 19 2014 Page 2 of 6 Zoning and General Plan The parcel currently possesses two different zoning designations with the Easterly half of the parcel being zoned low-medium residential (LM, 4-8 dwelling units/acre) and the Westerly half being zoned medium residential (M, 8-14 dwelling units/acre). The General Plan however, designates the entire site as medium residential (M, 8-14 dwelling units/acre) (see attachments). The surrounding land uses and zoning are as follows: • North — Single-Family Residential, Low-Medium (LM District, 4-8 dwelling units per acre. Small lot development with minimum lot size of 40'x82' = 3,280sf) • South — Bicycle and Running Trail, Multi-Family Residential, Medium-High (MH District, 14-24 dwelling units per acre) and Single-Family Residential, Low-Medium (LM District, 4-8 dwelling units per acre) • East — Single-Family, Low-Residential (L District, maximum of 4 dwelling units per acre) • West—Feed and Tack Store, Medium-High (MH District, 14-24 dwelling units per acre) Currently, with two zoning designations, the property could be designed with detached, single family units on the Easterly side, and attached multi-family units on the Westerly side. Developing the property in this manner would result in a fragmented development which may be undesirable on a relatively small 6.82-acre property. Another approach would be a "blended" zoning method (averaging LM & M densities), which would allow a maximum of 11 dwelling units per acre, or approximately 76 units across the entire site. The proposed development of 46 single family lots (6.74 dwelling units per gross acre) is consistent with the Low-Medium zoning designation (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is a less intense land use than both current zoning standards and the General Plan allow. It is proposed that the Easterly half of the site will be re- zoned to the "M" Medium-Residential zoning to establish consistent zoning across the development and to conform to the General Plan. Zoning guidelines and development standards will be established for detached, single family lots/homes in the "M" zone. The development to the north is designated LM but was developed prior to current zoning standards being established and has several deviations, including lots as small as 40' x 82' (3,280 s.f.) and 5/5 side yard setbacks. The overall density of the existing project to the North is 7.70 dwelling units/gross acre. The density of the proposed project (Tract 18912) is 6.74 dwelling units/gross acre. Compared to the existing neighborhood to the North, the proposed project (Tract 18912) is compatible with the existing Northerly neighborhood and will have larger lots and lower overall density. The parcel is constrained to the south by the Pacific Electric Bike Trail (SANBAG/railroad right- of-way). The location of the old railroad tracks and associated right-of-way have resulted in an irregular shaped parcel. Due to the narrow (and variable) north/south dimension of the parcel, lot depth and front yard setbacks per the "LM" Development Standards for Residential Districts are difficult to achieve. In addition, the property is also constrained by the curve in the proposed new public street which is required in order to properly align with La Vine St. to the east. The P207 Mr. Mike Smith February, 19 2014 Page 3 of 6 applicant is proposing front yard setbacks of 27', sideyard setbacks of 5/5, and minimum rear yard setbacks of 15'. The street scene will include varied front yard setbacks, mixed architectural massing, and architectural features such as front porches, low roofs, and set-back garage doors. Significant architectural enhancements are included on all four sides of all the homes including architectural popouts, varied roof lines, exterior window and door trim details, shutters, and decorative potshelfs. All homes will have a 2-car garage and a private driveway a minimum of 19' deep. An attached table summarizes the design guidelines used for the project. Open Space The proposed project will provide 137,330 square feet (3.15 acres) of private open space. This constitutes 61.5% of the net area of the project. Private open space includes front, rear, and side yards of each lot and does not include the street or parkways. The percentage of open space far exceeds the amount required for both the LM zone (40%), and the M zone (35%) as listed in the Development Code. We respectfully request your approval of this project. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me at (949) 250-4200. Sincerely, Craig Kozm Project Manager Manning Homes P208 Tract 18912 Proposed Tract Design Guideline Summary Standard 18912 Minimum Lot Area(minimum) 4,000sf 4,013sf Minimum Lot Area(minimum net ave) 4,000sf 4,907sf Lot Width(minimum) 45ft 45ft Lot Width(corner lot) 50ft 60ft Lot Depth(minimum) 80ft 83ft Minimum Frontage 3011 45ft Minimum Frontage(flag lot) 208 n/a Allowed Density(dwelling units per acre) Minimum Density(Net/excluding streets and ROW) 8 du/ac 8.88 du/ac Maximum Density(Net/excluding streets and ROW) 14 du/ac 8.88 du/ac Minimum Setback Front Yard ' (from curb face) 27ft 27ft Corner Side Yard (from curb face) 15ft 20ft Interior Side Yard 5/5 5/5 Rear Yard 15ft 15ft Building Height Primary Buildings 35ft 29ft max Lot Coverage Lot Coverage' 50% 45.5%max Open Space Requirement Private Open Space(excludes street&parkway) 35%min 62% Minimum Patio/Porch Depth 611 Eft ' Front yard setback can be reduced up to 5'to provide variation along the street. Does not include eves. 'Lot Coverage includes building footprint(incl.garages)and covered porches. Does not include eaves. P209 Mr. Mike Smith February, 19 2014 Page 5 of 6 GENERAL PLAN 0 I —Li 1_.. , ., , - ,,:r.-4016-71.61 , wz: 1,--J L HUH ,i [41,_] ),i — 0 _a ' , .:. _n— ,Lti.04--iscd , _i, j ,:z.vrtl 1_ DO ' - [-----.----]r i 1 ponamUumnip 1E7, L 0. .,„ rffa t d cili T0 1 o _ .—/e.3----- . ..... r (30 Y �, 7 i, 1 ELD---1 —1:--,/ 1 t:,:-..E-1-1..Li-11 re r_li4iLli ,ill . !ijo FIG 1 L !II v:.,-., .,,, .1 ---yiEdrsillril 11PC:=1 i lalL,,,,:7_1_ , ...7L-16-Itc-zp t em == �figl jilkC IL r 4,,FrrEA ,i _ In- - iisu ��livi ) 1 r-11 -jj -v )044-, „, ) �, ,_ maid r,. , � Ii__ __I-� t ° DUB` �fl ice! {f} inrili _._ , n[DUI S1.T �.� M - Medium Density Residential 8-14 du/ac P210 Mr. Mike Smith February, 19 2014 Page 6 of 6 ZONING mH ' cr 1 1 M ` M — , I -r . nt ' l 1 A l Los 1 ' — —� _. 11._ „„_____L 4 RE nm 7/ 1 'Mir --rD rilli' s i ma opo .3�(7 .Ji =i sir -117 LM 11 Li iiil j lii. Ell ''' '.N �r� �... Ii...Qalm 1 i Li ill lin ' it. F 1 ' ‘ n■ - tri ! mr41! A n f �--� L l WI rmi 1 1 T E Easterly 1/2 - LM (4-8 du/ac) Westerly 1/2 - M (8- 14 du/ac) P211 MANNING : • HOMES CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA February 20, 2014 FEB 2 0 2014 RECEIVED - PLANNING Mr. Mike Smith Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Subject: Minor Exception justification for wall height WaOlif • 061 Tentative Tract Map 18912 Submittal, 7074 Ramona Avenue Dear Mr. Smith: Manning Homes is pleased to present justification in support of a minor exception for wall heights for Tentative Tract Map 18912 on a 6.82±acre parcel of land located between Ramona and Archibald Avenues immediately North of the Pacific Electric Bike Trail. The parcel is constrained to the south by the Pacific Electric Bike Trail (SANBAG/railroad right-of- way). The location of the old railroad tracks and associated right-of-way have resulted in an irregular shaped parcel. Due to the narrow (and variable) north/south dimension of the parcel, lot depths, widths, and sizes are constrained. In addition, the property is also constrained by the curve in the proposed new public street which is required in order to properly align with La Vine St. to the east. These constraints, in combination with the natural topography of the site, require walls up to 7.5' in height (as calculated by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code). The combination walls are also required in order to avoid slopes between houses and provide as much usable/flat area within the yards of the proposed houses. The applicant is proposing a combination screen/retaining wall up to 7.5' in height in the rear yards of Lots 24-27 along Archibald Ave. The maximum height of this wall as viewed from Archibald Ave. will be 6', with the retaining portion facing inward towards the proposed houses. Combination screen/retaining walls no higher than 7.5' are also proposed on the sideyards, between houses on Lots 11-22 and 29-39. We respectfully request your approval of this minor exception. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me at (949) 250-4200. Sincerely, Craig Project Manager- Manning Homes 20151 SW Birch Street 1 Suite 150 1 Newport Beach CA 92660 1 TEL 949.250.4200 1 FAX 949.250.9008 1 WEB www.manninghomes.corn P212 March 1, 2014 To: Mr. Mike Smith, Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91729-0807 Re: DCR#2013-00887 2013-010133 SUBTT 18912/n4 -to I.1 File No.: Tract 18912; Proposed Development of46 Single Family Homes by Manning Homes& Watermill Homes Location: between Ramona Ave and Archibald Ave, north of bike trail Gentlepeople: I am concerned that the above captioned proposed deve!c pment would substantially interfere with the use and enjoyment of my property located at 9801 Yale Dr., adjacent to the proposed site(P.S.). I. The lower density zone that currently exists over the middle and eastern portion of the P.S.should be extended ,westward, over the rest of the site. . This would reduce congestion,noise, pollution, and traffic. The lower zone would be consistent with the neighboring density zones that lead in and out of the P.S.. 2. Construction work should be limited to reasonable times: after 8 am and before 5 pm,and not on weekends or holidays. 3. Construction equipment and vehicles should be fitted with smog and noise reduction devices. 4. Parking for employee and construction vehicles should be restricted and away from neighboring homes. 5. A common area should be developed on the P.S.. so that pre existing small common areas and parks outside the P.S. are not crowded with the residents of the P.S.. (example: I pay homeowner's fees for the upkeep of the small park across the street from my property and it was not intended to be used by a multitude of non H.O.A. members. ) Thank you for your time and attention,and please inform me in writing of all meetings on this matter. Very truly yours, Ai-Lun"Ellene"Tseng 9801 Yale Dr. Rancho Cucamonga,Ca. 91701 cm �`0 R n a 20 014 �E�Ep - 04114G RE 19C g/0/4 EXHIBIT M P213 March 10, 2014 Mike Smith Associate Planner, Community Development-City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 807 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 RE: Proposed construction of single family homes south of The Neighborhood HOA, Alta Loma. Dear Mike Smith, We have been a resident of Rancho Cucamonga for over 26-years and the growth has been exponential. The volume of traffic to Archibald Avenue has increased with the access to the 210 freeway. Roadways into Archibald Avenue have become perilous for those that live in aligning areas. We have no doubt that the proposed plans to route the development traffic for the area just south of the Neighborhood Homeowner's Association through Newton Place will pose a threat to safety. The Camden Drive access from the Neighborhood HOA to Archibald is a shared intersection with 4-way multiple traffic activity. Not only is the turn lanes small from Archibald Avenue into the east and west resident areas but there is not enough attention given to increased usage, speed, and adequate lighting. If not for the traffic interruptions caused by the Pacific Electric Trail walking path,vehicles turning into Archibald Avenue from the east and west would not be able to exit easily. Camden Drive descends into the residential area with a blind spot to vehicles and pedestrians entering and exiting the Neighborhood HOA. Newton Place is the first road upon entry.And as an immediate turn, it can be dangerous with increased traffic and vehicle speeds over 5 mph. Newton Place is a narrow residential road leaving little to no options for the current residents in having additional parking. If the traffic to the southern development routes through Newton Place, road parking would be impossible. Roadside parking throughout the Neighborhood HOA is limited for the capacity that exists. Disruption in US postal, utility, and disposal service is constant with notices of vehicle blockage. It is unfortunate that construction is considered for such a small wedge of land than in other outer areas of the city.The City of Rancho Cucamonga would be valued more in decisions to maintain and preserve historic sites and land for parks and vineyards which the city's logo seems to promote. With the concerns stated above, it is suggested that the city consider proposals for the southern development with heed to safety and preservation. If the city favors construction on the southern property, remapping for a cul-de-sac with entry from Ramona Avenue and a fire access only to Archibald Avenue may be an alternative than routing an increase of nearly 50%traffic through the Neighborhood HOA via Newton Place. If proposals include routing traffic through Newton Place,we stand opposed. Regards, E. Kyler& LaDonna Kohler Resident to the Neighborhood HOA 9835 Yale Drive, Alta Loma,CA 91701 P214 March 10, 2014 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Mike Smith Associate Planner,Community Development-City of Rancho Cucamonga MAR 1 1 2014 P. O. Box 10500 Civic is Center Drive RECEIVED - PLANNING Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 RE: Proposed construction of single family homes south of The Neighborhood HOA,Alta Loma. Dear Mike Smith, We have been a resident of Rancho Cucamonga for over 26-years and the growth has been exponential. The volume of traffic to Archibald Avenue has increased with the access to the 210 freeway. Roadways into Archibald Avenue have become perilous for those that live in aligning areas. We have no doubt that the proposed plans to route the development traffic for the area just south of the Neighborhood Homeowner's Association through Newton Place will pose a threat to safety. The Camden Drive access from the Neighborhood HOA to Archibald is a shared intersection with 4-way multiple traffic activity. Not only is the turn lanes small from Archibald Avenue into the east and west resident areas but there is not enough attention given to increased usage, speed, and adequate lighting. If not for the traffic interruptions caused by the Pacific Electric Trail walking path,vehicles turning into Archibald Avenue from the east and west would not be able to exit easily. Camden Drive descends into the residential area with a blind spot to vehicles and pedestrians entering and exiting the Neighborhood HOA. Newton Place is the first road upon entry.And as an immediate turn, it can be dangerous with increased traffic and vehicle speeds over 5 mph. Newton Place is a narrow residential road leaving little to no options for the current residents in having additional parking. If the traffic to the southern development routes through Newton Place, road parking would be impossible. Roadside parking throughout the Neighborhood HOA is limited for the capacity that exists. Disruption in US postal, utility, and disposal service is constant with notices of vehicle blockage. It is unfortunate that construction is considered for such a small wedge of land than in other outer areas of the city.The City of Rancho Cucamonga would be valued more in decisions to maintain and preserve historic sites and land for parks and vineyards which the city's logo seems to promote. With the concerns stated above, it is suggested that the city consider proposals for the southern development with heed to safety and preservation. If the city favors construction on the southern property, remapping for a cul-de-sac with entry from Ramona Avenue and a fire access only to Archibald Avenue may be an alternative than routing an increase of nearly 50%traffic through the Neighborhood HOA via Newton Place. If proposals include routing traffic through Newton Place, we stand opposed. Regards, E. Kyler& LaDonna Kohler Resident to the Neighborhood HOA 9835 Yale Drive, Alta Loma, CA 91701 3- /6, — L,7 i-5 'Jailff S Cv !L , cep/^3J 73 cycu4 cv , rc 060462, y -OA e , G Ca-e <) c ed, `mac ' th CC) ,r) pet, ap24,/, (/(/ 72t ibx-ce/ - t) 1/41-Lez-c,Le -14-&22, "62-0 rAd zi6j 62'00/C7 U-kf,J « e,Iti bit -L-1C s_e eA2 /I'CtL.,va_62_,) O/ta cam* ' , tu ctiv Zcei,.t j / e eta/&-te-N bl Q.e UCd" 1� �1-Q� ` ei&i c 61-e do £c) Je&U- L 24g Q. y l) Xtiu.�-t./-82.? CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONPG2A1 6 March 10, 2014 MAR 18 2014 Mike Smith • Associate Planner, Community Development - City of Rancho CucamaCEIVED _ PLANNING P. O. Box 807 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 RE: Proposed construction of single-family homes south of The Neighborhood HOA, Alta Loma. Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083) Dear Mike Smith, Although we have been a resident of Rancho Cucamonga for just under seven years, we have seen a significant change to our neighborhood. The volume of traffic on Archibald Avenue has increased due to new construction, and completion of the 210 freeway. Families not living in our neighborhood, but drive children to school each morning, use our neighborhood as a by- pass/cut-through from Archibald to Ramona due to the high volume of traffic on roadways. This in itself has been a safety concern, and very discouraging for those that live in aligning areas and specifically in our neighborhood. I have no doubt that the proposed plans to route the development traffic for the area just south of the Neighborhood Homeowner's Association through Newton Place will pose an even bigger threat to the safety and well being of those of us that live in our quaint community. The Camden Drive access from the Neighborhood HOA to Archibald is a shared intersection with 4-way multiple traffic activity. Not only are the turn lanes small from Archibald Avenue into the east and west resident areas but also there is not enough attention given to usage and adequate lighting. If not for the traffic interruptions caused by the Pacific Electric Trail walking path, vehicles turning into Archibald Avenue from the east and west would not be able to exit easily. Camden Drive descends into the residential area causing a blind spot for vehicles and pedestrians coming from or going into the Neighborhood HOA. Newton Place is the first road upon entry. And as an immediate turn, it poses a threat to safety with any increase to entering the neighborhood with vehicle speeds over 5 mph and traffic to the roadway. Newton Place is a narrow residential road leaving little to no options for the current residents in having additional parking. If the traffic to the southern development routes through Newton Place, road parking would be impossible. Roadside parking throughout the Neighborhood HOA is limited for the capacity that exists. Disruption in US postal, utility, and disposal service is constant with notices of vehicle blockage. It is unfortunate that construction is considered for such a small wedge of land than in other outer areas of the city. The City of Rancho Cucamonga would be valued more in decisions to maintain and preserve historic sites and land for parks and vineyards, which the city's logo seems to promote. New construction in this area also posses a threat to wildlife; specifically the Owls, and Red-tailed Hawks living in the Eucalyptus trees, that provide a wind break to our neighborhood at the So end of that property. In addition, the issue of rodents, possum, and • P217 squirrels will now seek refuge and inhabit our garages, and attics due to their displacement once new construction begins. With the concerns stated above, it is suggested that the city consider proposals for the southern development with heed to safety and preservation. If the city favors construction on the southern property, remapping for a cul-de-sac with entry from Ramona Avenue and a fire access only to Archibald Avenue may be an alternative than routing traffic through the Neighborhood HOA via Newton Place. If proposals include routing traffic through Newton Place, we stand opposed. Regards, Robert J. and Donna M. Oshiro Resident to the Neighborhood HOA 9848 Yale Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 P218 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MAR 242014 March 20, 2014 RECEIVED - PLANNING Mr. & Mrs. Ruben Estrada 7038 Princeton Place Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701-5900 Mr. Mike Smith Associate Planner, Community Development City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 Dear Mr. Smith: We live in The Neighborhood which is next to the Azalea community that is being proposed. After taking several looks at what is planned, my husband and I are writing this letter to express our concerns. We think these concerns are shared by other Neighborhood residents as well. For example: We are familiar with main streets such as Foothill Boulevard or Archibald Avenue being thoroughfares, providing access to many side streets, businesses, multiple communities, etc. We are also familiar with streets that only give access to the houses on them. However, we are not familiar with short, narrow streets such as Newton Place being used as thoroughfares in busy communities such as ours. Also, the expected household density the 46 Azalea homes would bring also concerns us. With 46 new homes that will potentially bring 2-3 vehicles each, and half of them likely entering and exiting their community through The Neighborhood twice each day, (four trips per household minus a projected 2 trips onto Ramona Ave.) we foresee the following problems: • Unsafe traffic congestion at the intersections of Archibald Ave., Camden Drive & Newton Place • Unsafe turns from Archibald Ave. onto Camden Drive • Unsafe turns from Camden Drive onto Newton Place • The need for traffic signals at the intersection of Archibald & Camden • Reduced safety for pedestrians and for children playing on Newton or Camden • Disruption of privacy and safe access to homes for Newton Place residents • Encroachment on The Neighborhood's park and parking • An increased need for pavement repairs within The Neighborhood • Reduction in privacy between Azalea and The Neighborhood, depending upon how the Azalea homes are placed P219 • Azalea residents' and construction vehicles passing through The Neighborhood • The release of rats, possums, owls, hawks and other life forms now located on land where fruit trees and eucalyptus trees provide shelter and food To remedy these potentially hazardous, encroaching and costly conditions, we suggest the following revisions to the Azalea Plan: 1. Build fewer homes. Ensure home placement within Azalea that will maximize privacy and aesthetics for both communities. 2. Do not create access through The Neighborhood for Azalea construction or motorists' use. 3. Create driveway access for Azalea residents directly from Ramona Ave. and Archibald Ave. 4. Provide visitor parking within the Azalea community. 5. Give written notice to The Neighborhood and other nearby residents when wildlife displacement will begin. 6. Consider building green space as a buffer between the Azalea Community and The Neighborhood. This green space could be a park, similar to the park in The Neighborhood. We understand that new construction can often be a welcomed uplift to an area; yet with these considerations, we believe care must be taken to ensure that the Azalea project does not diminish the quality of life the community now enjoys. Thank you for the time you have spent acquainting us with this project. We will rely on you to move our concerns and recommendations forward. Cordially, , , .., AIL • uben Estra't o Ivy Estrada P220 Smith, Michael From: Nancy DiVincenzo <nandivincenzo @yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 7:53 PM To: Smith, Michael Cc: nandivincenzo @yahoo.com Subject: Concerned resident Re: manning home development newton place/Archibald To City of Rancho Cucamonga: I am a resident of The Neighborhood Community. My main concern regarding this development is the Newton Place traffic that will increase and the safety of the street. Please do a traffic study. When maps are presented regarding the development it does not give a true picture. When turning from Archibald onto Camden then right onto Newton Place there is a huge down slope and a blind spot. Cars increase speed when turning in then they come down the slope. It's hard to see people that are walking or riding their bikes etc. It is a very dangerous situation as is but if you add the increased traffic from 40 homes it becomes much worse. Also cars at times will park on Camden when you turn off Archibald. Please consider making that a no parking zone. I am aware that this development is happening, I hope we can come to a compromise and make it safe for all the residents.Thank you for considering this. Nancy Divincenzo nandivincenzo @yahoo.com 1(909)262-2803 Sent from my iPad 1 P221 Smith, Michael From: Sally Martinez <santafesally04 @yahoo.com> Sent Thursday, April 10, 2014 7:29 AM To: Smith, Michael Subject: RE: Manning Development(Azalea) April 9,2014 Luis &Sally Martinez 7032 Princeton PI. Alta Loma, CA 91701 Mr. Mike Smith Associate Planner, Community Development City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 Dear Mr. Smith: I would like to thank you first for being at the meeting with the Neighborhood' residents on April 8 and answering our questions. We live on the SW corner of Camden and Princeton which already has traffic from outside our community creating dangerous driving hazards to all our residents. I am sure when the Manning homes are built;that danger will only greatly increase if they open the street through Newton Pl. With the proposed 46 homes and 92-184 more residents the population explosion in our quiet community will be extremely compromised. Of course the safety issue which all residents of this community are concerned about will be a great challenge for all pedestrians as well as the neighborhood children. The Fire Department's claim that the response time will be hampered if they have to enter through Ramona instead of Newton P1 seems to be an absurd point because the residents on Ramona or any other location east of Ramona will have the very same response time to any emergency calls. As of right now we have two exits in our small and somewhat private community. That will end due to traffic from the Manning residents if they open Newton Pl. Due to added congestion, we will not be able to exit from Camden to Archibald with the additional traffic from the minimum of 92 or more vehicles added to the overcrowding. We will be needing a light installed at the Camden/Archibald location if this happens; I do hope the city will be prepared for that. I expect that the Traffic Dept.will come and review our situation without blindly approving the Newton street expansion. 1 P222 And the families on Newton P1., I'm sure regardless of what the street looks like on a map, were under the impression that street was a cul de sac, which it has been for at least 26 years and now they're being told it will be a thoroughfare. To any fair minded person that seems like an extremely rational point of view. That should have been an obvious disclosure when purchasing their house if Newton PI would be extended into another possible community. We had the presumption of privacy, now we do not. I know the Eucalyptus trees were brought up...and here is the cities tree removal link...1 do hope Manning homes has seen this and will be complying with Rancho's criteria. http://www.cityofrc.us/cityhall/planning/answers.asp?id=954 From what I understand, in the Manning Azalea community there will be no park or association. I would like to be assured they will not be using our pool or facilities in our association. We have had numerous problems with strangers coming into our recreation area creating a drug problem and causing vandalism. I do hope the crime in our community does not increase. I understand that Manning homes has already purchased the land and has every intention to go forward with their building project. That is not the issue. The issue is that they will be disrupting our quiet neighborhood and bull dozing their way through our community to do so. I hope the various depts.of the City and Fire Dept.will take our resident's wishes and concerns into account. Please let me know that you received this email. Thank you. Sincerely, Luis and Sally Martinez 2 P223 Smith, Michael From: LaDonna Kohler <Ladonnak @ccul.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 10:00 AM To: 'craig @manninghomes.com'; Smith, Michael Subject: Neighborhood Meeting -April 29th, 2014 RE: SUBTT18912/Development Review DRC2013-01083,46-lot subdivision between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue. Good Morning, Thank you for rescheduling another meeting to address questions and comments to the proposed development south of the Neighborhood. Was the mailing made to all current residents? Some have received your mailing; but not all. I am a renter to the neighborhood and found out through neighbors and the actual homeowner of the rescheduled meeting. And I suspect your notice to homeowners would not reach all current residences leaving 30%out of the discussion. Regards, LaDonna Kohler 9835 Yale Drive Alta Loma, CA 91701 1 P224 Smith, Michael From: Colin Lally <clally @outlook.com> Sent Wednesday,April 16, 2014 1:20 PM To: Smith, Michael; lallyc @coyote.csusb.edu;jim @manninghomes.com Subject: The Neighborhood Homeowners Association v Manning Homes Dear Mr. Smith et al. , please consider my primary objection to the opening of the cul-de- sac at the end of Newton Place; according to article XVI recorded on October 31 1985, document No. 85-271105, at the San Bernardino County Recorder, the planned urban development comprises of "private streets, [and] landscaped open areas". Therefore, the private access road should not open to a Manning Homes development site. Further, I ask you to initiate a traffic study for support of my secondary complaint. That is to say, with the opening of Newton Place, on the south-west side of the Neighborhood Home Owners Association, it will effectively reduce the livability and safety of the homeowners' way of life on the street. For example, with increased traffic through the neighborhood from a collector road to a local road that serves our private development--we have an accident waiting to happen, as vehicles speed through, and children play outside. Moreover, please consider that our Neighborhood Homeowners Association is a private community, with a pool and a park for our residents to enjoy in the common area, which we pay dues for, and along with having by-laws to adhere to, we can effectively maintain the integrity of the neighborhood, but with others in our neighborhood, we lose control, and the ability to enforce our by-laws. One solution for the development that Manning Homes proposes, is a right turn road at Archibald Avenue, which should suffice for emergency vehicles too. Bear in mind, that this area had a fire in a eucalyptus tree, a number of years ago, and emergency vehicles could not transit Newton Place, because of parked vehicles, and they had to set up operations on Camden to fight the fire; thus, access from Archibald is a better alternative for an emergency vehicle access road to the new development. Yours sincerely, C. Lally 1 P225 Smith, Michael From: Tricia Vanderpool <tricia @euclidmanagement.com> Sent Thursday, April 17, 2014 3:09 PM To: Smith, Michael Subject: DCR#2013-00887/2013-01083 City of Rancho Cucamonga Attention: Michael Smith,Associate Planner 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91729 Re: DCR#2013-00887 2013-01083 SUBTT 18912 File:Tract 18912; Proposed Development of 46 Single Family Homes by Manning and Watermill Homes Location: Between Ramona Ave and Archibald Ave, north of bike trail To Whom It May Concern, At The Neighborhood HOA Board Meeting held on March 6, 2014, a large number of homeowners were in attendance to discuss their many concerns of the potential new home construction just south of the association. Although each homeowner will be sending in a formal letter of concern, the homeowners in attendance asked that a general letter be sent stating their trepidation with this project should it move forward. 1. Gate to be installed on Newton to allow access for homeowners of the new association to enter through The Neighborhood HOA. This street is extremely narrow and would not allow enough room for homeowners to park on the street, play in front yards, or allow construction equipment through and would increase the amount of traffic throughout the association at all times. They would not want the homeowners of the new association utilizing the Neighborhood HOA park and pool area. 2. Hours of Construction recommended being after 8am and before 5pm Monday thru Friday. 3. Construction equipment and vehicle should be fitted with smog and noise reduction devices. 4. Parking for employee and construction vehicles should be restricted and away from neighboring homes. 5. Privacy of homes along Yale.The proposed homes will be two story and would butt home closely to these homes on Yale—will a new taller wall be built in place of the current wall. 6. The Neighborhood HOA maintains city owned property on Archibald-however the new project would not have to maintain any area on Archibald? 7. Will this new project cause an overflow of traffic and parking in the Neighborhood HOA/ 8. Who would maintain the wall in between the Homeowners Associations? 9. The existing Eucalyptus Trees are going to be removed and wildlife(Red tail Hawks)are going to be removed from their habitat?Where will the wildlife be moved to?Will there be rodent control when they are forced out of their habitat? Homeowners which have asked to be a part of this letter: 1. 9818 Westport—Chris Wheeler 909-238-2298 2. 9848 Yale—Donna and Bob Oshiro 909-527-3494 1 P226 3. 7032 Princeton—Luis and Sally Martinez 909-980-1386 4. 9835 Yale—LaDonna Kohler 909-944-0342 5. 9801 Yale—Ai Lun Tseng 6. 7012 Wakefield—Donna Rushing 909-989-0068 7. 9854 Westport-Stephen Bernard 909-684-8155 8. 7012 Newton—Georgia Martinez 909-948-7287 9. 7038 Newton—Jeff Olson 909-518-7339 10. 9805 Yale—Ingrid Van De Meer 11. 7018 Wakefield—Lisa DeNardo 909-240-2707 12. 7045 Newton—Mary Kupisiewicz 909-980-5676 13. 7038 Princeton—Ivy Estrada 562-436-4808/909-484-7957 14. 9809 Yale—Ron and Debbie Ciminesi 909-239-8351 15. 7032 Newton—Cheryl Gipson and Andrew Gipson 909-980-9812 16. 7039 Newton—Colin Lally 909-987-2676 17. 9824 Yale—Maureen Iglesias 323-428-4297 18. 7039 Wakefield—Richard and Trish Mayo 909-908.8518 • 19. 7013 Arlington—Daniel and Jennifer McGuire 909-238-9227 Sincerely, 'Diva rZnda/p*il Association Manager The Neighborhood Homeowners Association Tricia Lynn Vanderpool l Property Manager Tel 1 909-981-4131 Fax j 909-579-6529 ✓1 E U C L I xD 195 N. Euclid Ave I Upland, CA 91786 www.euclidmanagement.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This communication is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. It may contain information that is privileged or confidential and/or exempt from disclosure. Any unauthorized disclosure,distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,please notify the sender immediately by telephone or return e-mail and delete the message from your system. your assistance in maintaining the integrity of e-mail communications Is appreciated. • 2 P227 Smith, Michael From: Debbie Ciminesi <dcimi711 @msn.com> Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 4:21 PM To: Smith, Michael Subject: In regards to the proposed developement by Manning In regards to the proposed developement by Manning Homes in Alta Loma We have lived in The Neighborhood for 19 years and have enjoyed our quality of life including our privacy, our backyard backs up to the old orange grove ( proposed property)and the eucalyptus trees add beauty and shade to our quality of life. We upgraded our backyard a few years ago and put a lot of money into knowing that we have the shade of the trees. We have a lot of concerns. 1. Sharing our wall 2. Cutting trees downs which will raise our electricity bill because lack of shade. 3. Quality of life will be damaged due to cutting trees down that provide shade and beauty to our backyard and home. 4. Water consumption ( Calif is in a drought) adding 45 more homes means more water being used. 5. Electricity and Gas.... More blackouts due to more homes using electricity. 6. More traffic through Neighborhood. When is the city going to take a stand and start conserving water, electricity etc.... Why does every little bit of land have to be built on. All we hear about is we need to conserve on water,electricity and they want to build more homes with more families that need water and electricity . We, Ron and Debbie Ciminesi our very much against the building of these homes! Ron and Debbie Ciminesi 9809 Yale dr Alta Loma,ca 91701 #909-239-8351 Sent from my iPad 1 P228 Smith, Michael From: melsmom531 @aol.com Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 5:18 PM To: Smith, Michael Subject: Manning Homes Mike, Thank you for the meeting last night at Deer Canyon. I think Manning Homes is a reputable builder who will build a nice development. I do agree that the project should not come through Newton. I knew when I moved in 24 years ago that street would some day come through. That being said, the distance from Archibald, Camden and Newton is just an accident waiting to happen by increasing traffic there. The speeds on Archibald are too fast and the turn in to Camden is also fast to then have Newton traffic driving across that short distance. A new improved Ramona will be much better for the traffic to come out of the new neighborhood. I was also wondering if I am inside the 600ft notice area. I live at 9837 Chesapeake Dr. Thank you again - I could feel your pain sometimes last night. People just don't know how the system works. Jeanne Cockrell i P229 ISSUES & CONCERNS RE: DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTY BETWEEN RAMONA & ARCHIBALD BY MANNING HOMES Neighborhood Meeting Tues. April 29, 2014. In attendance approximately 35 people. As requested, these issues and concerns are being submitted in writing and are collective input garnered from the meeting as well as comments from many local neighbors who were not able to attend, but who have requested their input added to this report. Major concerns are the increase of traffic on Ramona Ave that will result in congestion and safety of vehicle & pedestrian traffic. "Launch Site" at the PET crossing: Many speeders use that section of Ramona to "get air" as they speed on Ramona. Although it was promised that it will be graded "somewhat", the increase in traffic exiting the new portion of LaVine will create more of a safety hazard. The intersection of LaVine (which will continue across Ramona into the development) and Ramona will become increasingly dangerous. Currently exiting LaVine facing west onto Ramona turning either north or south; visibility for oncoming traffic is extremely compromised due to cars parked on Ramona's east side to the north and the elevation rise of the PET to the south. With increased traffic entering/exiting the new street, the danger of safely making way onto Ramona is heightened. When a four way stop was suggested, we were told the traffic volume did not warrant it. OUR RESPONSE: Well, perhaps not YET, but with more traffic the situation will change. Again with the "launch pad" at the trail and speeders on Ramona and the increase of daily traffic, this is going to become a major safety traffic hazard. Will on-street parking for the PET be allowed on the improved section of Ramona? As it is now, many PET users park on LaVine blocking the fire hydrant and the stop sign. Although this has been reported to police who post "compliance" notices of sort on these vehicles, it still remains a problem, especially on the weekends. Will the homes have adequate parking for all their vehicles, either in their own driveways or their own on-street parking? As we have seen P230 in this area, the current trend in this economy seems to be that many multi-generational families are living in one dwelling, which results in a tremendous increase of on-street parking. Many single family homes now account for four or five vehicles. Our concern is their "overflow" parking will be on Ramona, or LaVine east of Ramona. NOTE: This on-street parking is becoming a definite safety hazard at the North end of Ramona at the stop sign at 19th. While this has nothing to do with the current Manning development, it is a trend that is pervasive. People from the Sunrize Ridge apartments on 19th are using Ramona on-street parking as their overflow parking. Cars are parked on both east and west side of the street and illegally too close to the stop sign at the intersection. (This has been reported numerous times to police dispatch, but the problem continues). How will the safety issue of the PET be addressed at the Ramona crossing? Those of us who drive across the PET daily are concerned for the safety of people using the trail. Currently only a caution light is in place and must be activated by those who traverse the trail. Most times, pedestrians and cyclists do not use the button and often cross without looking for oncoming traffic. Again, with an additional 100-150 motorized vehicles in this development, the issue of safety for all is of great concern. Why are all the houses designated 2-story homes? Rancho is in need of single story homes. Diane Williams, city council person, has noted this need in the past. If zoning is an issue, then allow for more land per home and fewer homes. Initially the sign said 42 homes were to be built, however Manning has managed a way to fit in an additional 4 homes for a projected total of 46 houses. When it was brought to the floor about the number of homes with increased population density, we were told essentially, (paraphrased, but this is how it came across) "we should be grateful Manning was chosen to be the builders who want to make it Medium density because there were other builders in line who wanted to put big apartment buildings there". P231 Those of us who did not receive notice of the first meeting felt as if decisions were made final based on the opinions of that meeting: Specifically regarding nixing the plan of traffic flow onto Newton. While we all sympathize and agree with those residents they do not want that heavy traffic flow through their neighborhood; but it was a done deal without any other input of those remaining "650 foot residents". Only those residents who live in that neighborhood were part of that meeting. We trust in the future EVERYONE within that notification perimeter will receive proper notice. Majority does not want increased traffic on Ramona or Newton, but when suggested that entrance and exit be on Archibald, we were flatly told "no". But is there ANY way that can happen? That would be a solution that would appease most residents. Were the residents of the mobile home park to the south notified of this meeting or were they too far past the 650 foot notice? They will be impacted during the construction period. As stated over and over "all that is required by law is to notify those residents within 650 feet of the property". It was suggested that the notices of this and future meetings be posted on the website www.nextdoorneighbor.com. That way all residents within the Hermosa neighborhood would get notice of these meetings. People who are outside the 650 foot diameter notice area and who will be greatly impacted by the construction, would have the opportunity to know of plans. Currently many notices are posted on this website of happenings in the City. Please check into this method of notification. At the very least, can we have these meetings posted on the official City website so anyone can have access to the meeting dates and time regardless of the "650 foot notification law"? Temporary issues, but concerns nonetheless are the increase in vermin infiltrating our neighboring properties as these critters are displaced when construction begins. When the 210 freeway was under construction we were inundated with rodents. Response from Manning was if it becomes a problem, each individual resident should call them and they will "help" with that. P232 Is it possible that the low-lying brush can be cleared immediately? The remaining house is particularly vulnerable. Vagrants have been "camping" on the property and in the house. Although a fence has been erected at the property perimeter and the house is boarded up, those of us who use the trail are still seeing signs that the property and nearby trail is being used for sleeping and campfires. If the brush is cleared, then nearby residents can keep a better eye on the surroundings and report to local.police. There have been legal "NO TRESPASSING" signs posted which should result in immediate response from the police should we see anyone there who does not belong. Concern for the wild life inhabiting the property, particularly the nesting hawks was addressed. We were assured that those trees will not be disturbed until nesting season is over. The eucalyptus trees were deemed non-viable by Manning and will be cut down; however they promised that each lot will have two boxed eucalyptus that are a better choice for there. During construction, a lot of work will be done on Ramona. Residents were told that access would not be completely blocked, but at least one lane open at all times with a flag person. Concerns of building more housing during a time when we are in a severe drought was mentioned. The response was low flow toilets/showers will be installed. P233 Smith, Michael To: Grahn, Tom Subject: RE: Proposed Azalea Project Alta Loma From:vickygoodwinl @hotmail.com (mailto:vickygoodwinl @hotmail.comJ On Behalf Of Vicky Jones Sent:Tuesday, May 06, 2014 5:33 PM To: craig @manninghomes.com;jim @manninghomes.com Cc:Grahn,Tom; Dennis Jones; Diane Williams; PatBob Curtis Subject: Proposed Azalea Project Alta Loma Importance: High Dear Sirs . . I had the pleasure of meeting you at last months community meeting at Deer Creek Elementary School. The site plan that you have available on your web site is a better fit for the neighborhood than the alternate plan you presented at this meeting. An oversized cul-de-sac with only one entrance/exit is in my opinion, a poor design. I gathered that you had a previous meeting that was not advertised well and the community members that live just north of this proposed project and that the residents objected to having their street be considered for the tie in to Archibald. It is not reasonable to have all of the traffic enter and exit from Ramona, it would however, be reasonable to each neighborhood to bear the inconvenience equally, not one over the other. Since the addition of these large homes will raise the property value of the existing neighborhoods, this seems to be a reasonable consideration. With regards to accessing the Pacific Electric Trail, I can show you two recent examples of Builders who provided gates for their community members/residents to have access the PE Trail. The first example is Olen Jones, a retirement community that sits adjacent to the PE Trail at Amethyst. The Senior residents enjoy easy access to the Trail for exercise and use it on a regular basis. The second example is Pacific Trails by D.R. Horton. They are located at Foothill Blvd., just west of Vineyard and also provided a gate for their residents in their community to the PE Trail. The city of Rancho Cucamonga has been recognized by the White House for their Healthy RC initiatives as one of the top cities in the nation. The city has re-committed to the needs of its community by providing its residents a multitude of options to choose from when considering exercise and healthy lifestyles. As the Vice-President of the Friends of the Pacific Electric Trail, I encourage you and your team to reconsider my suggestions about traffic in and out of this project and also adding access to the PE Trail and possibly a rest stop for this new community, donated by Manning Homes. t P234 I welcome the opportunity to meet with you at a future date to share examples of Trail Amenities that have been donated on the PE Trail from our community members. I look forward to hearing back from you at your earliest convenience. BTW, SANBAG is one of our biggest partners and support the work we have done in the Inland Empire. Peace, Victoria Jones Vice President/Community Outreach Director Friends of the Pacific Electric Trail www.PETrailorg Victoria jon es pe trail org 909.921.1059 2 P235 Smith, Michael From: Paula Stamey <raewil @msn.com> Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 8:25 AM To: Smith, Michael Subject: Tree planting Manning Development Ramona Hello Michael, Please add to list of neighbor concerns regarding this development. Mr. Manning said each house would have two sliver dollar box eucalyptus trees planted. Eucalyptus trees are not native to California. Didn't know the city approved these plantings anymore. Eucalyptus trees are highly volatile. They are an extreme fire hazard due to the oil in these trees. With nearly 100 being planted in this development, within a few years there will be a forest of highly flammable trees within a few feet of our property. Mr. Manning stated at the meeting they are willing to change the type of tree that is going in. Thanks Paula Stamey 1 • P236 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Mike Smith June 3, 2014 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18912 - MANNING HOMES - A review of a proposed 46-lot subdivision of a vacant parcel of about 7.16 acres within the Medium (M) and Low Medium (LM) Residential Districts located between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue at the north side of the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail - APN: 1076-181-01. Related files: Pre Application Review DRC2013-00545, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2013-00887, Development Review DRC2013-01083, Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00889, Minor Exception DRC2014-00161. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-01083 — MANNING HOMES - A review of a proposal for 46 single-family residences in conjunction with a 46-lot subdivision of about 7.16 acres within the Medium (M) and Low Medium (LM) Residential Districts located between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue at the north side of the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail - APN: 1076-181-01. Related files: Pre-Application Review DRC2013-00545, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2013-00887, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912, Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00889, and Minor Exception DRC2014-00161. Site Characteristics: The project site is a rectangular parcel with an overall area of approximately 312,000 square feet (7.16 acres). The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 1,200 feet deep (east to west) and 250 feet (north to south). The project site is generally vacant with the exception of a single-family residence that was built in ca. 1915 that is located at the east side of the project site near Ramona Avenue. To the west of the project site, is an equestrian/pet supplies retail store (CW Feed & Pet). To the north and east are single-family residences. To the south is an apartment complex (Sycamore Springs) and a mobile home park (Ramona Villa Mobile Home Estates). The site has street frontage on Archibald Avenue and Ramona Street to the west and east, respectively. Adjacent and parallel to the south property line of the site is the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail, which is partially completed at this location. The zoning of the west half of the site is Medium (M) Residential District, while the zoning of the east half of the site is Low Medium (LM) Residential District. The zoning of the property to the west is Medium High (MH) Residential District. The zoning of the properties to the north is Low Medium (LM) Residential District. The zoning of the properties to the east is Low (L) Residential District. The subject property is generally level with a slope that trends from west to east; the elevations at the west and east sides of the property are approximately 1,398 feet and 1,373 feet, respectively. Associated Applications/Background: The applicant, in conjunction with the subject applications, proposes to change the zoning of the eastern half of the project site to Medium (M) Residential District (Related file: Zoning Map Amendment DRC2013-00887). The applicant has elected to develop the property according to the requirements outlined in Table 17.36.010-2 — Optional Development Standards which will allow for more flexibility in developing the site. However, as the Development Code currently does not have optional development standards for single-family residential development in the Medium (M) Residential District, the applicant, in coordination with staff, is in the process of creating standards that apply to, for example, lot dimensions, setbacks, and lot coverage. General: The applicant proposes to subdivide the property into 45 lots for a single-family residential development. The lots will be developed in accordance with standards that are currently being developed as noted above. Individual lot areas will range between 4,013 square feet to 10,529 square PC 1/13/14 EXHIBIT N P237 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA SUBTT18912 AND DRC2013-01083 — MANNING HOMES June 3, 2014 Page 2 feet; the average lot area is 4,907 square feet. The depth of each lot will be at least 90 feet with the exception of Lots 26, 27, 44, and 45. Those lots will have a depth of between approximately 60 feet and 80 feet. The width of each lot, except the above-noted lots, at the required front setback will be between 45 feet and 50 feet. Lots 26, 27, 44, and 45 will have a width of between 65 feet (Lot 27) to 137 feet (Lot 26). Access to the subdivision will be via a new public street connected directly to Ramona Street. This street will terminate with a cul-de-sac at the west side of the project site. For emergency purposes, a second point of access referred to as an Emergency Vehicle Access (EVA) will be provided at the end of the cul-de-sac and connect to Archibald Avenue via a specialized driveway. The technical and design details of this driveway are still in process. Parallel to the south property line, the applicant will "build-out" the missing segment of the Pacific Electric trail between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Street. This segment will have a decomposed granite surface and will match the existing segments of the trail that continue to the east and west of the site. It will complement the existing, concrete-surfaced component of the trail that follows the same general alignment. In conjunction with the tentative tract map, the applicant proposes to construct a single-family residence on each lot for a total of 45 single-family residences. Although all of the houses will be two-story, this does not conflict with Section 17.122.010(A)(1)(a) of the Development Code. This Code section requires that a minimum of 25 percent of a residential development be comprised of single-story houses; however, the requirement only applies to residential development with lots in excess of 7,200 square feet. The applicant proposes four (4) types of architectural themes (elevations) — Traditional, Bungalow, Spanish, and Cottage. Each house will incorporate a variety of materials to varying degrees depending on the theme. Each house will have an articulated footprint/floor plan and profile. The applicant proposes three (3) distinct footprints — Plans 1, 2, and 3, and reverse footprints of each for a total of six (6) footprints. The number of available footprints will comply with Table 17.122.010-1 of the Development Code. Because the footprints and profiles of each house differ, there will be a variety of movement in the wall planes and roof lines. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. 1. Spanish (all Plans) — Revise the Spanish-themed elevations so that they incorporate more features that are characteristic of the architectural theme including arched and/or recessed windows (with shutters having the corresponding curved top edge) and wrought iron accents on all elevations. 2. All themes (all Plans) — Provide more variety in the roof pitches — do not limit the pitch of the roof to only 4:12 or 5:12. 3. All themes (all Plans)—Add decorative pot shelves at the windows on the rear elevations. 4. Cottage and Bungalow (all Plans) — Add a decorative stone veneer wainscot and trimcap to the front P238 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA SUBTT18912 AND DRC2013-01083 — MANNING HOMES June 3, 2014 Page 3 and rear elevations and base of the columns/pillars that support the porch cover at the entrances. 5. Traditional (all Plans) — Add a decorative brick veneer wainscot and trimcap to the front and rear elevations and base of the columns/pillars that support the porch cover at the entrances. 6. All themes except Spanish (all Plans) — At the front elevation, the decorative veneer shall `wrap' around the corners of each house and terminate at the return wall. At the rear elevation, the decorative veneer shall wrap around the corners of each house and terminate at a point at least 3 feet from the corner. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. 1. Add decorative windows on all garage doors. 2. The molding along the top of the stone or brick veneer wainscots shall also be stone or brick and not foam. 3. All rock veneer shall be real river rock and not synthetic. Staff Recommendation: With Major and Secondary Issues addressed to the satisfaction of the Committee, staff recommends that the project be approved and forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action. Design Review Committee Action: Staff presented a brief overview of the project and summarized the major/secondary issues relating to the architecture and site development. The applicant followed with a response to the comments report. He noted that his design team had addressed some of the comments prior to the meeting. The applicant and the Committee discussed the other comments and various solutions to address them. The Committee accepted the applicant's proposed solutions (that were already completed) and recommend approval subject to the completion of the following revisions (to be verified by Staff prior to review and action by the Planning Commission): 1. Add decorative ironwork details and arched windows and/or recessed windows on the front and rear elevations of the Spanish theme; 2. The roof pitch of the Cottage theme shall be 6:12; 3. Add stone veneer to the Cottage theme and brick veneer to the Traditional theme (front and rear elevations) -the Bungalow theme does not need any veneer; 4. Add pot shelves at some of the windows of all themes; P239 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA SUBTT18912 AND DRC2013-01083 — MANNING HOMES June 3, 2014 Page 4 5. Add windows on the garage doors of at least 50 percent of the homes within the subdivision; and 6. Add vertical elements to the garage doors of the Bungalow and Traditional themes. Staff Planner: Mike Smith Members Present: Oaxaca, Granger J J (1) ( ( -- - O Li) LIIII.P70 0 -,,1 co d c co r o N C CD A �U 5 O ° CZ N = J / J o °- Ramona Avenue U g t CU 0:1 a 1-- ca oo Ir c co O allej O N r r g 4 '3-. aj O N O C O ° W ■1 ■■ U m ° re ta- \ o • L CI N i CD ° r c � a� 0 i o il Newton Place 00 m l't N � " _ . as a) Archibald Avenue U ii iii 1- o Tu re-V/30.-/ . EXHIBIT 0 . 4'P' I 6. 8 o N.co ..i. co .,_ cy, a, L O N .J C Z:3" , 5 N U g J o! o 0 Ramona Avenue EW L • 0 Q v 2 Ce �c J cc ev 2 of c o � 1 N �� ' J r N o U op o E 0 0 N U m W 1 CI 71 . 0 > E d .L C C c 0 0 o -0 CO . ago E — a4 0 a O V . 0 ill 0 El N co cr) Ct Newton Place a. 0 t- p I _ m d D £ . a c Archibald Avenue g E .... a as 1:3 a) 0 El > — • ogi d Q Le 1- 0 a Pc 4I3l/t/ • EXHIBIT P P242 Article III, Chapter 17.36 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code TABLE 17.36.010-1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS Development Standard/ VL L LM M MH H Zoning District Lot Area (minimum) 20,000 sf 7.200 sf 5,000 sf 3 ac(1) 3 ac(1) 3 ac(11 Lot Area (minimum net avg) 22,500 sf 8,000 sf 5,000 sf 3 ac(1) 3 ac j1> 3 ac(1) Lot Width (minimum) . 90 ft(2) 65 ft(2) 50 ft(2) n/a n/a n/a Lot Width (corner lot) 100 ft 70 ft 50 ft n/a n/a n/a Lot Depth (minimum) 200 ft 100 ft 90 ft n/a n/a n/a Minimum Frontage 50 ft 40 ft 30 ft 100 ft 100 ft 100 ft Minimum Frontage (flag lot) 30 ft 20 ft 20 ft 50 ft 50 ft 50 ft Allowed Density(dwelling units per acre) Minimum Density(3) n/a n/a 4 du/ac 8 du/ac 14 du/ac 24 du/ac Maximum Density 2 du/ac 4 du/ac 8 du/ac(4) 14 du/ac(4) 24 du/ac 30 du/ac Minimum Setback Front Yard (5) 42 ft(6) 37 ft(6) 32 ft(6) 37 ft 16) n/a n/a Corner Side Yard (5) 27 ft 27 ft 22 ft 27 ft n/a n/a Interior Side Yard (5) 10/15 ft 5/10 ft 5/10 ft 10 ft(7) n/a n/a Rear Yard (5) 60 ft 20 ft 15 ft 10 ft(7) n/a n/a At Interior Site Boundary (Dwelling/Accessory NR(8) 15/5(7) 15/5(7) 15/5(7) Building) Building Height(maximum in feet)(9) Primary Buildings 35 ft 35 ft 35 ft 35 ft(10) 40 ft(10) 55 ft(10) Lot Coverage(maximum lot coverage with buildings as a percentage of the parcel or project) Lot Coverage 25% 40% 50% 50% 50% 50% Open Space Requirement(minimum percentage of open space per parcel or project) Private Open Space (Ground Floor/Upper Story) 300/150 sf 225/150 sf 150/100 sf 150/100 sf Open Space(Private and Common) 40% 35% 35% 35% Minimum Patio/Porch Depth 6 ft(11) 6 ft(11) 6 ft(11) 6 ft(t1) 6 ft(11) 6 ft(11) Minimum Dwelling Unit Size(12) Single-Family (attached and detached) 1,000 sf Multi-Family(13) Efficiency/Studio 550 sf Multi-Family 1131 One Bedroom 650 sf pe di&/ii EXHIBIT Q P243 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article Ill, Chapter 17.36 Development Standard/ VL L LM M MH H Zoning District _ Multi-Family(13) 800 sf Two Bedroom Multi-Family(13) 950 sf Three or More Bedrooms Distance Between Building/Structure Fronts(8)(14)(minimum) Between buildings with no patio — — 30 ft 30 ft 30 ft 30 ft or recessed patio Between patio fence/wall less — — 15 ft 15 ft 15 ft 15 ft than 5 feet in height Between patio fence/wall more — — 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft than 5 feet in height Between balconies above patio fence/wall more than 5 feet in — — 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft height Between a patio fence/wall and — — 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft a building wall With common patio fence/wall — — 30 ft 30 ft 30 ft 30 ft Other Miscellaneous Building Setback Requirements(8)(minimum) Building to one-story detached garage/carport or other 6 ft/15 ft 15 ft 15 15 accessory structure Building to wall or curb at 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft project entry Table Notes: (1) On existing lots of record,parcels less than 3 acres or less than the required minimum frontage may only be developed at the lowest end of the permitted density range. (2) Average width,which shall vary accordingly: VL-+/- 10 feet L &LM-+/-5 feet (3) Excluding land necessary for secondary streets and arterials and in hillside areas shall be dependent on the slope/capacity factor contained in Chapter 17.52(Hillside Development Standards). (4) Developing multi-family in the LM district and single-family in the M district at the maximum density requires compliance with Standards for Higher Residential Densities as outlined in Subsection 17.36.010.D. (5) Setbacks are measured between the structure and curb face in front yards and corner side yards. Setbacks are measured between the structure and property line in rear yards and interior side yards. (6) Front yard setbacks in new residential developments may be reduced by up to 5 feet to allow for variation in structural setbacks along the street. (7) Add 10 feet if adjacent to VL, L.or LM district. (8) Applies to buildings two stories and taller in height.Add 10 more feet for each story over two stories. (9) In hillside areas,heights shall be limited to 30 feet. (10) Limit one story within 100 feet of VL or L district for multiple-family dwellings. (11) Free and clear of obstructions. (12) Senior citizen projects are exempted from this requirement. (13) To assure that smaller units are not concentrated in any one area or project,the following percentage limitations of the total ' number of units shall apply: 10% for efficiency/studio and 35% for one bedroom or up to 35% combined. Subject to a Conditional Use Permit,the Planning Commission may authorize a greater ratio of efficiency or one-bedroom units when a development exhibits innovative design qualities and a balanced mix of unit sizes and types. (14) Front"is defined as the face of the building or unit with the major glass area and/or major recreation area and may include access to that private recreation area. This access may or may not relate to the primary entrance to the building that faces the street or drive;therefore,some buildings may have more than one front. 17.36-3 P244 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article III, Chapter 17.36 g. Jogging/walking trails with exercise stations. 4. For each one hundred (100) units above the first two hundred (200) units, another set of recreational amenities as described in Subsection 17.122.040M.3 above shall be provided. 5. Other recreational amenities not listed above may be considered subject to Planning Commission review and approval. 6. Related recreational activities may be grouped together and located at any one area of the common open space. 7. Dispersal of recreational facilities throughout the site shall be required for development with multiple recreational facilities. 8. All recreation areas or facilities required by this Section shall be maintained by private homeowners associations, property owners, or private assessment districts. Single-family residential development within VL, L, LM, HR, and OS zoning districts shall have public or private streets designed to the approved standards of the City. TABLE 17.36.010-2 OPTIONAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS Zoning District VL L LM M Minimum Site Area (Gross) 5 ac 5 ac 5 ac 5 ac Dwelling Units per Acre Up to 8 Up to 14 Up to 24 Up to 30 Minimum Dwelling Unit Size Single-Family and Multi-Family See Table 17.36.010-1 Public Street Setback 42 ft avg 42 ft avg 42 ft avg 47 ft avg Vary±5 ft Vary±5 ft Vary±5 ft Vary±5 ft Private Street or Driveway Setback 15 ft avg 5 f 5 ft Vary±5 ft 5ft Corner Side Yard 10 ft 5 ft — Interior Side Yard — 10 ft"1(2) — Interior Site Boundary (Dwelling Unit/Accessory Building) 15/5 ft 20/5 ft(') 20/5 ft(n 20/5 ft(1) Residential Building Separations See Table 17.36.010-1 Height Limitations 35 ft(3) 35 ft(3) 40 ft(3) 50 ft(3) Private Open Space (Ground Floor/Upper Story) 300/150 sf 225/150 sf 150/100 sf 150/100 sf Open Space(Private and Common) 45% 40% 40% 40% Minimum Patio/Porch Depth 6 ft(4) 6 ft(4) 6 ft(4) 6 ft(4) Recreation Facility Required per Section 17.32.040 Table Notes: (1) Add 10 feet if adjacent to VL, L, or LM district. (2) Zero lot line dwellings permitted pursuant to Subsection 17.36.010.D. Po 113/1q 17.36-5 EXHIBIT R P245 Tract 18912 Proposed Tract Design Guideline Summary Standard 18912 Minimum Lot Area(minimum) 4,000sf 4,013sf Minimum Lot Area(minimum net ave) 4,000sf 4,907sf Lot Width(minimum) 45ft 45ft Lot Width(corner lot) 50ft 60ft Lot Depth(minimum) 80ft 83ft Minimum Frontage 30ft 45ft Minimum Frontage(flag lot) 20ft n/a Allowed Density(dwelling units per acre) Minimum Density(Net/excluding streets and ROW) 8 du/ac 8.88 du/ac Maximum Density(Net/excluding streets and ROW) 14 du/ac 8.88 du/ac Minimum Setback Front Yard ' (from curb face) 27ft 27ft Corner Side Yard (from curb face) 15ft 20ft Interior Side Yard 5/5 5/5 Rear Yard 15ft 15ft Building Height Primary Buildings 35ft 29ft max Lot Coverage Lot Coverages 50% 45.5%max Open Space Requirement Private Open Space(excludes street&parkway) 35%min 62% Minimum Patio/Porch Depth 6ft 6ft ' Front yard setback can be reduced up to 5'to provide variation along the street. Does not include eves. 'Lot Coverage includes building footprint(incl.garages)and covered porches. Does not include eaves. EXHIBIT S P246 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA L% j SPECIAL MEETING RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 14, 2013 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance 7:02 PM Roll Call Chairman Howdyshell X Vice Chairman Fletcher X Munoz X Wimberly X Oaxaca X Additional Staff Present: Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager; Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development; Betty Miller, Senior Engineer II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Planning Commission on any item listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. None Pc v e1'&' EXHIBIT T P247 PLANNING COMMISSION SPECIAL h � MEETING MINUTES �•M RANCHO GUCAMONGA MON AUGUST 14, 2013 Page 2 IIII. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION A. PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2013-00545-MANNING HOMES-A review of a proposal to construct a new residential development consisting of 42 homes on 6.9 acres located north of the Pacific Electric Trail between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue. APN: 1076-181-01. Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager, made opening remarks and introduced the project. The applicant's team, gave a PowerPoint presentation and presented the conceptual plans. The following items were brought up in the discussion: trail improvements, wall heights, Ramona storm drain improvements, street length, fire access, linkage to the park, density and compatibility with the neighboring properties, tree removal and relevant conditions and the slope on the trail and who is responsible for the maintenance of that slope. The Commission gave broad comments and they were generally pleased with the improvements made in the conceptual plans. IV. ADJOURNMENT 7:42 PM • - — P248 _ _,ARC%1®ALD _AVENUE - - _-_:_i),.. _ T�. _ _ `1� U ____evA"T-- 1y f S 1' J f e s Fr 1 C l YY yb I q IA 1 r' ✓ -lun1' '� L,,z. I I ' b Y.y 1a. 4 u a 1.� 1 pi e E § - r Yr 1 11::11 O F F .:y i 1`p11 � - 1 JII I y y ' �IL rg, c : i .14 r* t 4 i y 7-7t;:... R i I Uat II `• I `, 5. 1NE:� OF !. , 1 �(. t f U yfll fa I .I -, 1 11111.1: 71471 11 SULFl = as II I I' 16�•I 1 1 cl ItH I �� 1,,411 n E ° I1 I k y .O ' IF I H III,LII III, i 'f{ 11 seg I F § ; 1' 6 • f I it 4 Ir1 6 ��. II 9 N; 1-b 1 5 g pp I C ) I, 5 , Y E ` t ;� t.. . 211-., 1, e,•�, !1§ Z 1 .. III 9 I f ¢ t o �\ - 'G zD I ; ( \ eIi pc E ` s m I 'I z 11 $$9 1 ;.I l a 1 : Clow. 1-, - � - �� me,m i1 ji 5n N) �,z f1MAONA AVENUE i - 6 ° A' SITE PLAN rert roea.c.iw lb IAA . INNGRCMES #k a ma SF 901811Ht 1160 OEMPOCIT•ooanm.Ca au MOO P249 RESOLUTION NO. 14-25 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA,APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18912, A REQUEST FOR A 45-LOT SUBDIVISION OF A VACANT PARCEL OF ABOUT 7.16 ACRES WITHIN THE MEDIUM (M) AND LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, LOCATED BETWEEN ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND RAMONA AVENUE, AT THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC INLAND EMPIRE TRAIL, ABOUT 1,400 FEET NORTH OF BASE LINE ROAD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 1076-181-01. A. Recitals. 1. Manning Homes filed an application for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of August 2014 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on August 13, 2014, including written and oral staff reports,together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a parcel located between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue, at the north side of the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail, about 1,400 feet north of Base Line Road; and b. The project site is a rectangular parcel with an overall area of about 312,000 square feet (7.16 acres). The overall dimensions of the site are about 1,200 feet deep (east to west) and 250 feet (north to south); and c. The project site is generally vacant with the exception of a single-family residence that was built circa 1915 that is located at the east side of the project site near Ramona Avenue; and d. To the west of the project site, is an equestrian/pet supplies retail store;to the north and east are single-family residences; and to the south are an apartment complex and a mobile home park; and e. According to the Zoning Map adopted by the City Council on July 18, 2012, the project site is currently within two zoning districts. The western half of the project site, an area of about 147,000 square feet (about 3.37 acres), is zoned as Medium (M) Residential District. The ATTACHMENT B 0 P25O PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-25 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18912 — MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 2 eastern half of the project, an area of about 165,000 square feet (about 3.77 acres), is zoned as Low Medium (LM) Residential District; and f. The applicant has submitted Zoning Map Amendment DRC2013-00887 in order to change the zoning of the project site so that it is uniformly Medium (M) Residential and consistent with the General Plan designation of Medium Residential; and g. The zoning of the property to the west is Medium High (MH) Residential District. The zoning of the properties to the north is Low Medium (LM) Residential District. The zoning of the properties to the east is Low (L) Residential District. The zoning of the properties to the south (beyond the aforementioned trail) are partly Medium High (MH) Residential District and partly and Low Medium (LM) Residential District; and h. The proposal is to subdivide the property into 45 lots for single-family residential development; and i. As "basic" and "optional" development standards are not provided in Tables 17.36.010-1 and 17.36.010-2, respectively, of the Development Code, the lots will be developed in accordance with new development standards that the applicant, in coordination with the City, have created for incorporation into the Development Code that will apply to single-family residential development in the Medium (M) Residential Districts. The applicant in coordination with the City has submitted Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00626 for this purpose; and j. Individual lot areas will range between 4,013 square feet to 10,529 square feet;the average lot area is 4,907 square feet. The depth of each lot will be at least 90 feet with the exception of Lots 26, 27, 44, and 45. Those lots will have a depth of between about 60 feet and 80 feet. The width of each lot, except the above-noted lots, at the required front setback will be between 45 feet and 50 feet. Lots 26, 27,44, and 45 will have a width of between 65 feet(Lot 27)to 137 feet (Lot 26); and k. This application is in conjunction with Development Review DRC2013-01083, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2013-00887,Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00889, Minor Exception DRC2014-00161, and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00626. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed subdivision is in accord with the General Plan and the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposal is to subdivide a property with an area of about 7.16 acres into 45 lots for single-family residential development. The underlying General Plan designation is Medium Residential. b. The proposed development,together with the conditions applicable thereto,will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project site is generally vacant; the proposed land use is consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the west half of the site is Medium (M) Residential District, while the zoning of the east half of the site is Low Medium (LM) Residential District. The zoning of the property to the west is Medium High (MH) Residential District. The zoning of the properties to the north is Low Medium (LM) Residential District. The zoning of the properties to the east is Low (L) 0 P251 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-25 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18912— MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 3 Residential District. The zoning of the properties to the south (beyond the aforementioned trail)are partly Medium High (MH) Residential District and partly and Low Medium (LM) Residential District. c. The proposed development complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The lots will be developed in accordance with new development standards that are the subject of related Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00626 and will apply to single-family residential development within the Medium (M) Residential Districts. The proposed development will otherwise comply with all standards outlined in the Development Code and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration,together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto,and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that;with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii)that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings,the Planning Commission hereby recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Manager of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. P252 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-25 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18912— MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 4 Planning Department 1) Approval is for the subdivision of a parcel of about 7.16 acres into 45 lots within the Medium (M) and Low Medium (LM) Residential Districts located between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue, at the north side of the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail, about 1,400 feet north of Base Line Road -APN: 1076-181-01. 2) Development of all lots shall be in accordance with the standards and requirements applicable to the Medium (M) Residential District as described in the development standards that are the subject of Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00626. 3) Prior to the issuance of permits for grading and/or building construction, the applicant shall consult with the City to determine the final technical and design details of the emergency vehicle access (EVA) driveway. 4) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections _ _ of the Development Code, Etiwanda Specific Plan, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 5) Prior to the recordation of the Final Map, the existing single-family residence and any associated improvements shall be demolished and removed from the project site. 6) Prior to recordation of the Final Map, all lots shall be rough graded to include building pads and interim improvements (for example, drainage) as deemed necessary by the City. 7) Prior to issuance of permits for grading and/or building construction, the applicant shall consult with a qualified biologist to determine the best means (such as trapping, barriers, relocation, etc.)for controlling the migration of animals onto neighboring properties while the site is being graded and homes are being constructed. The applicant shall then submit a report indicating which method(s) will be used, and implement them accordingly. 8) Approval of this application is contingent on the approval of Zoning Map Amendment DRC2013-00887 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00626. 9) All Conditions of Approval for Development Review DRC2013-01083, Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00889, and Minor Exception DRC2014-00161 shall apply. Grading 1) The applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Official prior to issuance of the grading permit for any 0 P253 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-25 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18912— MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 5 underground water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMPs). 2) An HCOC exists for the downstream receiving water. The downstream receiving water (Mill Creek, Prado Area) is experiencing significant degradation of its banks. The project shall implement a volume-based treatment control BMP (retention/detention facility) on each lot. The Storm Water Quality Management Plan and the grading plan must contain an appropriate volume based BMP prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 3) The site shall be rough graded to eliminate all cross-lot drainage, (except in approved facilities adjacent to private trails). All slopes and retaining walls necessary to accomplish this shall be installed prior to final map approval. 4) Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lines gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent. 5) The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout (Information for Grading Plans and Permit". Engineering Services Department 1) Ramona Avenue frontage improvements are to be in accordance with City "Collector" standards as required and including: a) Provide curb, gutter, a.c. pavement, street trees, and sidewalk. Provide curb adjacent sidewalk north of La Vine Street and property line adjacent sidewalk south of La Vine Street. b) Provide traffic signing and striping as required. c) Install one LED streetlight that complies with Southern California Edison's lighting standards. d) Ramona Avenue shall be reconstructed and widened full width to match the existing improvements to the north and south, ending at the existing full width improvements south of the Pacific Electric Trail crossing. e) The developer shall install the Master Plan Storm Drain facilities on Ramona Avenue designed by the City Capital Improvement Section. Installation will end at the first manhole south of the Pacific Electric Trail. The developer shall be eligible for drainage impact fee credit and/or reimbursement of the portion of the storm drain to be installed that is designated as a master plan facility. Fee credit and/or reimbursement is subject to the City's normal master plan storm drain policies. P254 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-25 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18912—MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 6 2) Archibald Avenue frontage improvements are to be in accordance with City "Major Arterial" standards as required and including: a) Protect curb, gutter, sidewalk, and street lights as required. b) Protect traffic signing and striping as required. c) Remove the existing drive approach on the northerly tract boundary and replaced with curb and gutter. d) Access to/from Archibald Avenue shall be for emergency vehicle access only. The emergency access shall be 26 feet wide and shall be constructed as a limited access curb per City Std. 105-C. The material to be installed within the City right-of-way shall be reviewed and approved by The Rancho Cucamonga Fire District. No accent paving allowed within the City right-of-way. Pedestrian access to Archibald Avenue shall also be provided. 3) Interior street improvements are to be in accordance with City 'Local" standards as required and including: a) Provide curb, gutter, a.c. pavement, street trees, and sidewalk as required. b) Provide traffic signing and striping as required. c) The driveways are to be in accordance with the City Driveway Policy. d) Install LED street lights that comply with Southern California Edison's lighting standards. e) Align the centerline of the proposed street with the centerline of La Vine Street. 4) Install Landscape Maintenance District (LMD) improvements along project frontage on Archibald Avenue: a) The easement for landscape purposes on Archibald Avenue should match the width of the project to the north for City to maintain a consistent look along the street. It shows 6-foot wide easement per Tract 12532. The landscape design should comply with our 60 percent landscape/40 percent hardscape standards. b) Improvements shall conform to the Archibald Avenue Beautification Master Plan. c) The maximum slope within public maintained landscape areas shall be 3:1. Where slopes occur, a 1-foot flat area behind the sidewalk • '- 0 P255 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-25 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18912—MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 7 shall be provided. Slopes higher than 6 feet shall have a 2-foot wide flat shelf at the top, along the base of the walls. 5) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Ramona Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole south of the north project boundary to the first pole south of the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. 6) Additional improvements on the community trail/SANBAG right-of-way will be required such as decomposed granite community trail with concrete mow curbs, concrete v-ditch, landscaping, trail lighting, monument and drainage inlet consistent with other segments of the Pacific Electric Trail. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits,the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. ' J P256 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-25 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18912— MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 8 • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds(i.e.,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB])daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter(PM1o)emissions,in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 10) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 11) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 12) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 13) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 14) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor 0 a P257 • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-25 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18912 — MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 9 wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. Biological Resources 1) If vegetation removal, soil disturbance, or any other construction related activity is to occur during the avian nesting season (February 1 through August 31), a preconstruction nesting survey shall be conducted prior to initiation of construction. If nests are discovered, they should be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist and consistent with CDFW protocols. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and left the nest, then construction in the area could resume. If initial ground disturbing activities or site clearing is proposed to occur outside of the nesting season (September 1 through January 31), then a preconstruction survey would not be required and construction could commence unimpeded. 2) The trees that are located within the interior of the project, but not including the trees within the Eucalyptus windrow along the north side of the project site, shall be replaced with new trees, on a one-to-one basis, of a minimum 15-gallon size. These trees are in addition to the trees that are required by the Development Code for new residential development. 3) The trees that are located within the Eucalyptus windrow along the north side of the project site, shall be replaced with new trees, on a one-to-one basis,of a minimum 24-inch box size. These trees shall be planted within the rear yards of Lots 26—43 and side yards of Lots 44 and 45. These trees are in addition to the trees that are required by the Development Code for new residential development. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. (` P258 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-25 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18912 — MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 10 • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report,documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide- specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures(i.e., paleontological monitoring)that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. t` P259 • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-25 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18912 — MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 11 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. Greenhouse Gas Emissions 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for construction crew. 7) Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, the Project Applicant shall submit to the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) a plan for implementation of one or more of the mitigation measures/strategies to reduce GHG emissions from the CAPCOA "CEQA and Climate Change" White Paper. The total reduction of the implemented mitigation selected must result in a minimum of 5 percent. The selected mitigation measures/strategies and any measures for their long-term maintenance must be described and submitted as part of this report to the City for their approval. 8) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled, and manufactured in an 0 0 P260 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-25 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18912 — MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 12 environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC) materials. 9) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including, but not limited to, any combination of: • Increased insulation, • Limit air leakage through the structure, • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances, • Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping, • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems, •- Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements, • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 10) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: ' • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design buildings to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low-flow faucets, dual flush toilets, and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non-vegetated surfaces. 11) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during P261 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-25 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18912— MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 13 construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants street cleaning will- be--- - — performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Madole and Associates in December 2013, to reduce pollutants during and after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 7) Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent(NOI)to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of P262 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-25 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18912—MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 14 the Waste Discharger's Identification Number)shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise 1) Prior to the issuance of any Grading Plans a construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 2) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 3) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 4) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase. 5) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips(counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 0 0 P263 • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-25 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18912 — MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 15 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF AUGUST 2014. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Frances Howdyshell, Chairman ATTEST:0_P� h A_4„--,---, Candyc men, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, S cretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of August 2014, by the following vote-to-wit: -- -- - AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, MUNOZ, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: HOWDYSHELL ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE • 0 • P264 • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT i DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: SUBTT18912 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP APPLICANT: MANNING HOMES BETWEEN ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND RAMONA AENUE, ABOUT 1400 FEET NORTH OF LOCATION: BASE LINE ROAD—APN:1076-181-01 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT._ APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements Completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, _/_/_ its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 is granted subject to the approval of _/_/_ 0RC2013-00887 and DRC2014-00626. 3. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 14-25, Standard _/_/_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 4. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. _/_/_ The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Manager hearing. a) Mitigated Negative Declaration - $2,206.25 1 0 P265 Project No SUBTT18912 Completion Date B. Time Limits 1. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the _/_/_ Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which _/_/_ include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all _/_/_ Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building _/_/_ Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 4. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be � /_ submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 5: All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall /_/_ be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 7. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval in accordance _/_/_ with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 8. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/_/_ including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards. 9. Where corner side, interior side or rear yard property lines are adjacent to local equestrian /_/_ trails, construct minimum 6-foot high decorative masonry walls. Decorative masonry shall mean split-face double sided block, 'slump stone or an alternative material that is acceptable to the Design Review Committee. 10. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Manager and Engineering Services • Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 11. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Manager and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community 2 P266 Project No SUBTT18912 Completion Date concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 12. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double /_/_ wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 13. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), / /_ rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 14. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood /_/_ gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 15. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. _/_/_ 16. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. /_/_ The 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Manager, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. . 17. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be /_/_ manufactured products. D. Building Design 1. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowner's Association shall be submitted for _/_/_ Planning Manager and Building and Safety Official review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. 2. For all residential development, provide conduit from each unit/lot and a pull box to connect /_/_ to the street. Provide interior structured wiring for each house/building with minimum Category 5 copper wire, Radio Grade 6 coaxial cable, and a central distribution panel, prior to release of occupancy (fiber-to-the building, FTTB). Plans shall be submitted for Planning Manager and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in /_/_ depth from back of sidewalk. F. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home _/_/_ landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 2. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less _/_/_ than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent 3 0 0 P267 Project No SUBTT18912 Completion Date irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 3. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or _/_/_ greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 4. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 5. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the _/_/_ Development Code. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 6. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be _/_/_ included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Manager review— - and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 7. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on _/ /_ the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 8. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, _/_/_ the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. G. Environmental 1. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of _/_/_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Manager in the amount of $ 581 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. H. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and _/_/_ location of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY SERVICES DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 4 0 0 P268 • Project No SUBTT18912 Completion Date NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S). I. Building and Safety Change of Occupancy Standard Conditions General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans. Plans must be wet stamped and signed. —/—F- 2. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation —/—!- coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 3. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by —/- the Building and Safety Services Department. J. Building and Safety Tenant Improvement Standard Conditions 1. Submit five complete sets of plans. —/—/— 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, and two sets of energy conservation calculations. _/_/- (if applicable) 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation —/—/_ coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by —/_�- the Building and Safety Services Department. 5. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's —f —/- public counter). 6. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday —/_�- through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 7. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC)for fire-resistive construction. —/_/_ 8. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for accessibility to public —/_I— buildings. 9. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for California Building Energy /_�_ Efficient Standards. 10. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. —f_�_ 11. Provide draft stops in combustible attics and concealed spaces, in accordance with CBC. —L_/_ 12. Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. / / 5 P269 • Project No SUBTT18912 Completion Date K. Building and Safety Single-Family Residential Standard Conditions /_/_ General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan and reverse foundation plan (when applicable); c. Floor Plan; d. Roof and Floor Framing Plan and reverse Roof and Floor Framing Plan (when applicable); e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (i.e., SUBTT, SUBTPM, MDR, CUP, DRC, etc.) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and /_/_ a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet"-signature are required prior to plan- - check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation _/_/_ coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. /_/_ Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall /_/_ be marked with the project file number(i.e., SUBTT18912). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Services Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits for a new residential project or major addition, the _/_/_ applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees. The applicant shall provide a copy of the School Fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permit issuance. 3. The Building and Safety Official shall provide street addresses after tract/parcel map _/_/ recordation and prior to issuance of Building Permits. 4. Construction activity shall occur in accordance with the standards as stated in Chapter / /_ 17.66.050 D-4 of the Development Code. New Structures _/_/- 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistive requirements. 6 0 P270 Project No SUBTT18912 Completion Date 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. _/_/_ 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's"high wind" instructions. / /_ 4. The home must be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers in accordance with NFPA 13D. _/_/_ 5. Annexation of the parcel: Annexation of the parcel into the Community Facilities District _/_/_ #85-1 or#88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or Building Permits. L. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California _/_/_ Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The grading and drainage plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading and drainage plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to /_/_ perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or engineering geologist and _/_/_ submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall _/_/_ be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 5. A separate Grading and Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects _/_/_ and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 6. If human remains are discovered on-site before or during grading, no further disturbance _/_/_ shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 and California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5. 7. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and /_/_ place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 8. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety /_/_ Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from the Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 9. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall _/_/_ be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage _/_/_ easements prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 7 • 0 0 P271 Project No SUBTT18912 Completion Date 11. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage _/_/_ acceptance letter(s) from adjacent downstream property owner(s) or discharge flows in a natural condition (concentrated flows are not accepted) and shall provide the Building and Safety Official a drainage study showing the proposed flows do not exceed the existing flows prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 12. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent _/_/_ property owners to construct walls on property lines or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed off-set from the prbperty line. 13. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction _I_/_ where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 14. The Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right _/_/_ of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 15. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot off-set from the public right-of-way or adjacent private _/_/_ property. 16. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted /_/_ California Plumbing Code.. 17. The final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100 feet _/_/_ beyond the project boundary. 18. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill _/_/_ combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 19. The precise Grading and Drainage Plan shall follow the format provided in the City of _/_/_ Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit." • 8 ( P272 • Project No SUBTT18912 Completion Date 20. Grading Inspections: —/ /- a. Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the Grading Permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b. The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i. The bottom of the over-excavation; ii. At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Services Department front counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv. The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a Building Permit: - 21. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the _/_/_ functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. 22. The Water Quality Management Plan shall include a copy of the project Conditions of _/_/_ Approval. M. Water Quality Management Plan 1. A full size Site and Drainage Plan labeled as Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan _/_/_ shall be submitted for review with the Conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. THE APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: N. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on / /_ the final map. 0. Street Improvements 1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, _/ /_ landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a _/_/_ source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may 9 0 P273 Project No SUBTT18912 Completion Date have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: _/_/_ Curb& A.C. Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail Other Ramona Avenue X X X X X X • - Interior Streets X X X X X X 4. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety _/_/_ lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a _/_/_ construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. C. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, / /_ and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or _/I_ reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: _/_/_ 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City _/_/_ Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with _/_/_ adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall _/_/_ be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first _/_/_ plan check. 10 `. P274 Project No SUBTT18912 Completion Date 5. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in / / accordance with the City's street tree program. 6. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The / /- completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet—(typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Min. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Qty. - Ramona Avenue Pyrus betulaefolia Dancer Flowering 3' 20' 15 "Paradis" Pear O.C. Gal Interior Streets SELECT APPROPRIATE TREE FROM THE APPROVED STREET TREE Provide Street LIST FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA. LIST EACH STRET AS A SEPARATE Names LINE ITEM WITHIN THIS LEGEND. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector._ 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. P. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards —/—/- shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District:: Archibald Avenue. 2. Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas( percent) of —/—/— mortared cobble or other acceptable non-irrigated surfaces 3. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and —/—/- Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 4. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City. 5. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective —/—/- Beautification Master Plan Archibald Avenue Beautification Master Plan. Q. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, —/—/- gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV(all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 11 0 P275 Project No SUBTT18912 Completion Date 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. —/ / 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the —/-1— Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. —/—/- Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. R. General Requirements and Approvals 1. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their —/—/- right of-way: SANBAG 2. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. • 3. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative —/—/- fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first Building Permit application is submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: The project must comply in design and constructed in accordance with the 2010 California Building and Fire Codes, the RCFPD Ordinance FD50 and the RCFPD Standards. The RCFPD ordinance, procedures& standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at www.cityofrc.us. S. Single-Family Tract Standard Conditions FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1. The public water supply and fire hydrants shall be design in accordance with RCFPD and /—/- CVWD Standards and Policies. 2. The private water supply (when applicable) and fire hydrants shall be design in accordance —/—/- with the RCFPD Ordinance, Standard 5-10 and the current edition of the California Fire Code. FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. Fire review and approval of the public water plans to be submitted to CVWD for permit —/—/- issuance. 2. Building Permits will not be issued until public fire protection water plans are approved and /—/- adequate water supply is provided for construction purposes. • 12 (" P276 • Project No SUBTT18912 Completion Date 3. On all architectural plan sets to be submitted for building plan check provide a Site Plan that _/_/_ illustrate all the proposed public and private fire hydrants located on/and within 600-feet of the project site. 4. The required fire flow for this project is calculated gallons per minute at a minimum residual _/_/_ pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with California Fire Code Appendix, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. The required minimum fire flow for this project may be reduced by 50 percent when automatic fire sprinklers are installed. 5. Public fire hydrants located within the immediate vicinity of the proposed project may be used _/_/_ to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. FSC-9 Single-family Residential Sales Model homes require approved Fire District vehicle _/_/_ access and water supply from a public or private water main system before construction. FCS-10 Fire Sprinklers: All structures must be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers in _/ /_ accordance with NFPA 13D and the current edition of the California residential Code. FSC-13 Alternate Method Application: Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal /_/_ will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the review fee. _ _ FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: the project must be annexed into the Community / /_ Facilities District #85-1 or #88-1. The annexation must be completed prior to the issuance of grading or Building Permits. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS— Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any Building Permits: 1. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing _/_/_ the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CVWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Standard #10-5. 2. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the _/_/_ requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #14-1. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. 3. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CVWD must be received. The applicant is _/_/_ responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CVWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION— Please complete the following: 13 0 0 P277 • Project No SUBTT18912 Completion Date PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION— Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating _/_/_ the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Public Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access _/ /_ roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. 3. Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address / /_ with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street. When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. • • • 14 ,. P278 RESOLUTION NO. 14-26 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-01083, A REVIEW OF A PROPOSAL FOR 45 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES IN CONJUNCTION WITH A 45-LOT SUBDIVISION OF ABOUT 7.16 ACRES WITHIN THE MEDIUM (M) AND LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL LOCATED BETWEEN ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND RAMONA AVENUE, AT THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC INLAND EMPIRE TRAIL,ABOUT 1,400 FEET NORTH OF BASE LINE ROAD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 1076-181-01. A. Recitals. 1. Manning Homes filed an application for Development Review DRC2013-01083 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of August 2014, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on August 13, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a parcel located between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue, at the north side of the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail, about 1,400 feet north of Base Line Road; and b. The project site is a rectangular parcel with an overall area of about 312,000 square feet (7.16 acres). The overall dimensions of the site are about 1,200 feet deep (east to west) and 250 feet (north to south); and c. The project site is generally vacant with the exception of a single-family residence that was built circa 1915 that is located at the east side of the project site near Ramona Avenue;and d. To the west of the project site, is an equestrian/pet supplies retail store;to the north and east are single-family residences; and to the south are an apartment complex and a mobile home park; and • ATTACHMENT C 0 0 P279 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-26 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-01083— MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 2 e. The proposal is to construct 45 single-family residences in conjunction with Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912; and f. The applicant proposes four(4)distinct footprints—Plans 1, 2, and 3, and reverse footprints of each for a total of six (6) footprints. The floor area of the houses will be between 2,566 square feet(Plan 1) and 3,163 square feet (Plan 3). The number of available footprints will comply with Table 17.122.010-1 of the Development Code; and g. As "basic" and "optional" development standards are not provided in Tables 17.36.010-1 and 17.36.010-2, respectively, of the Development Code, the lots will be developed in accordance with new development standards that the applicant, in coordination with the City, has created for incorporation into the Development Code that will apply to single-family residential development in the Medium (M) Residential Districts. The City has submitted Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00626 for this purpose; and h. This application is in conjunction with Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2013-00887, Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00889, Minor Exception DRC2014-00161, and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00626. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed subdivision is in accord with the General Plan and the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposal is to construct a single-family residence on each lot of a 45-lot subdivision (Related file: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912) for a total of 45 single-family residences. The underlying General Plan designation is Medium Residential. b. The proposed development,together with the conditions applicable thereto,will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project site is generally vacant; the proposed land use is consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the west half of the site is Medium (M) Residential District, while the zoning of the east half of the site is Low Medium (LM) Residential District. The zoning of the property to the west is Medium High (MH) Residential District. The zoning of the properties to the north is Low Medium (LM) Residential District. The zoning of the properties to the east is Low (L) Residential District. The zoning of the properties to the south (beyond the aforementioned trail) are partly Medium High (MH) Residential District and partly and Low Medium (LM) Residential District. c. The proposed development complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The lots will be developed in accordance with new development standards that are the subject of related Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00626 and will apply to single-family residential development in the Medium (M) Residential Districts. The proposed development will otherwise comply with all standards outlined in the Development Code and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council adopt a 0 t P28O PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-26 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-01083— MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 3 Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that,with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings,the Planning Commission hereby recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Manager of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the development of 45 single-family residences in conjunction with a 45-lot subdivision of about 7.16 acres within the Medium (M) and Low Medium (LM) Residential Districts, located between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue, at the north side of the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail, about 1,400 feet north of Base Line Road -APN: 1076-181-01. 2) Development of all lots shall be in accordance with the standards and requirements applicable to the Medium (M) Residential District as described in the development standards that are the subject of Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00626. t P281 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-26 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-01083—MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 4 3) Add stone veneer to the Cottage theme and brick veneer to the Traditional theme (front and rear elevations). 4) Pot shelves shall be provided beneath some of the windows of each house. 5) Fifty percent of the houses shall have garage doors with windows. 6) The molding along the top of the stone or brick veneer wainscots shall also be stone or brick and not foam. 7) Prior to issuance of permits for grading and/or building construction, the applicant shall consult with the City to determine the final technical and design details of the emergency vehicle access (EVA) driveway. 8) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, Etiwanda Specific Plan,State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 9) Model homes shall require the review of a separate Temporary Use Permit (Model Home) and fee prior to the submittal of documents for plan check and construction. Note: Parking in the street will not be permitted for this purpose. A temporary off-street parking area that complies with all applicable parking requirements will be required and must be shown on the plans for this permit. 10) Prior to grading and/or construction, the applicant shall consult with a qualified biologist to determine the best means (such as trapping, barriers, relocation, etc.) for controlling the migration of animals onto neighboring properties while the site is being graded and homes are being constructed. The applicant shall then submit a report indicating which method(s) will be used, and implement them accordingly. 11) Approval of this application is contingent on the approval of Zoning Map Amendment DRC2013-00887 and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00626. 12) All Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2013-00887, Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00889, and Minor Exception DRC2014-00161. Engineering Services Department 1) Ramona Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Collector" standards as required and including: a) Provide curb, gutter, a.c. pavement, street trees, and sidewalk. Provide curb adjacent sidewalk north of La Vine Street and the property line adjacent sidewalk south of La Vine Street. b) Provide traffic signing and striping as required. 0 0 P282 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-26 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-01083—MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 5 c) Install one LED streetlight that complies with SCE's lighting standards. d) Ramona Avenue shall be reconstructed and widened full width to match existing improvements to the north and south, ending at the existing full width improvements south of the Pacific Electric Trail crossing. e) The developer shall install the Master Plan Storm Drain facilities on Ramona Avenue designed by the City Capital Improvement Section. Installation will end at the first manhole south of the Pacific Electric Trail. The developer shall be eligible for drainage impact fee credit and/or reimbursement of the portion of the storm drain to be installed that is designated as a master plan facility. Fee credit and/or reimbursement is subject to the City's normal master plan storm drain policies. 2) Archibald Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Major Arterial" standards as required and including: a) Protect curb, gutter, sidewalk, and street lights as required. b) Protect traffic signing and striping as required. c) Remove the existing drive approach on the northerly tract boundary and replaced with curb and gutter. d) Access to/from Archibald Avenue shall be for emergency vehicle access only. The Emergency Access shall be 26 feet wide and shall be constructed as a limited access curb per City Std. 105-C. The material to be installed within the City right-of-way shall be reviewed and approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District. No accent paving allowed within the City right-of-way. Pedestrian access to Archibald Avenue shall also be provided. 3) Interior street improvements to be in accordance with City 'Local" standards as required and including: a) Provide curb, gutter, a.c. pavement, street trees, and sidewalk as required. b) Provide traffic signing and striping as required. c) The driveways are to be in accordance with City Driveway Policy. d) Install LED street lights that comply with Southern California Edison's lighting standards. e) Align the centerline of the proposed street with the centerline of La Vine Street. 0 P283 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-26 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-01083— MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 6 4) Install Landscape Maintenance District (LMD) improvements along project frontage on Archibald Avenue: a) The easement for landscape purposes on Archibald Avenue should match the width of the project to the north for City to maintain a consistent look along the street. It shows a 6-foot wide easement per Tract 12532. The landscape design should comply with our 60 percent landscape/40 percent hardscape standards. b) Improvements shall conform to the Archibald Avenue Beautification Master Plan. c) The maximum slope within public maintained landscape areas shall be 3:1. Where slopes occur, a 1-foot flat area behind the sidewalk shall be provided. Slopes higher than 6 feet shall have a 2-foot wide flat shelf at the top, along the base of the walls. 5) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Ramona Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole south of the north project boundary to the first pole south of the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. 6) Additional improvements on the community trail/SANBAG right-of-way will be required such as decomposed granite community trail with concrete mow curbs, concrete v-ditch, landscaping, trail lighting, monument and drainage inlet consistent with other segments of the Pacific Electric Trail. Grading 1) The applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Official prior to issuance of the grading permit for any underground water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMPs). 2) An HCOC exists for the downstream receiving water. The downstream receiving water (Mill Creek, Prado Area) is experiencing significant degradation of its banks. The project shall implement a volume-based treatment control BMP (retention/detention facility) on each lot. The Storm Water Quality Management Plan and the grading plan must contain an appropriate volume based BMP prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 3) The site shall be rough graded to eliminate all cross-lot drainage, (except in approved facilities adjacent to private trails). All slopes and retaining walls necessary to accomplish this shall be installed prior to final map approval. 0 ! P284 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-26 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-01083—MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 7 4) Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lines gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent. 5) The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout (Information for Grading Plans and Permit". Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits,the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Ruie 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • • 0 I' P285 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-26 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-01083— MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 8 • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e.,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB])daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter(PM,o)emissions,in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,()emissions. .. . 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 10) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 11) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 12) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 13) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 14) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. 0 0 P286 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-26 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-01083 — MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 9 Biological Resources 1) If vegetation removal, soil disturbance, or any other construction • related activity is to occur during the avian nesting season (February 1 through August 31), a preconstruction nesting survey shall be conducted prior to initiation of construction. If nests are discovered, they should be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist and consistent with CDFW protocols. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and left the nest, then construction in the area could resume. If initial ground disturbing activities or site clearing is proposed to occur outside of the nesting season (September 1 through January 31), then a preconstruction survey would not be required and construction could commence unimpeded. 2) The trees that are located within the interior of the project, but not - including the trees within the Eucalyptus windrow along the north side of the project site, shall be replaced with new trees, on a one-to-one basis, of a minimum 15-gallon size. These trees are in addition to the trees that are required by the Development Code for new residential development. 3) The trees that are located within the Eucalyptus windrow along the north side of the project site, shall be replaced with new trees, on a one-to-one basis, of a minimum 24-inch box size. These trees shall be planted within the rear yards of Lots 26—43 and side yards of Lots 44 and 45. These trees are in addition to the trees that are required by the Development Code for new residential development. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities,to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. P287 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-26 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-01083— MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 10 • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report,documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring)that may be appropriate. Where mitigation_ monitoring is appropriate,the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,() emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. C 0 P288 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-26 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-01083—MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 11 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. Greenhouse Gas Emissions 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low-emission factors. and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for construction crew. 7) Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, the Project Applicant shall submit to the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) a plan for implementation of one or more of the mitigation measures/strategies to reduce GHG emissions from the CAPCOA "CEQA and Climate Change" White Paper. The total reduction of the implemented mitigation selected must result in a minimum of 5 percent. The selected mitigation measures/strategies and any measures for their long-term maintenance must be described and submitted as part of this report to the City for their approval. 8) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled, and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC) materials. 0 P289 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-26 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-01083 — MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 12 9) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including, but not limited to, any combination of: • Increased insulation, • Limit air leakage through the structure, • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances, • Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping, • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems, • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements, • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 10) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design buildings to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low-flow faucets, dual flush toilets, and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non-vegetated surfaces. 11) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. P290 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-26 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-01083—MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 13 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Madole and Associates in December 2013, to reduce pollutants during and after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 7) Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent(NOI)to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)General • Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number)shall be submitted to the 0 0 P291 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-26 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-01083— MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 14 City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise 1) Prior to the issuance of any Grading Plans a construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 2) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 3) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring_as specified in Development. Code . Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 4) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase. 5) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips(counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. 0 P292 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-26 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-01083—MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 15 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF AUGUST 2014. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Frances Howdyshell, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce B $-ft, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of August 2014, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, MUNOZ, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: HOWDYSHELL ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE 0 0 P293 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT i DEPARTMENT • STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: DRC2013-01083 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICANT: MANNING HOMES BETWEEN ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND RAMONA AVENUE, ABOUT 1,400 FEET NORTH LOCATION: OF BASE LINE ROAD —APN: 1076-181-01. ALL OE THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. -- APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements Completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, _/_/_ its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 14-26, Standard _/_/_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. / /_ The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Manager hearing. a) Mitigated Negative Declaration -$2,206.25 X 1 0 P294 Project No. DRC2013-01083 Completion Date B. Time Limits 1. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not _/_/_ commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which _/_/_ include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all _/_/_ Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code _/_/_ and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 4. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be /_/_ . submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits_ 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development _/_/_ Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 7. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall _/_/_ be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 8. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval in accordance _I_/_ with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 9. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/_/_ including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards. 10. Where corner side, interior side or rear yard property lines are adjacent to local equestrian /_I_ trails, construct minimum 6-foot high decorative masonry walls. Decorative masonry shall mean split-face double sided block, 'slump stone'or an alternative material that is acceptable to the Design Review Committee. 11. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Manager and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 12. The developer shalt submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of _/_/_ all lots for Planning Manager and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but 2 P295 Project No. DRC2013-01083 Completion Date not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 13. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double _/_/_ wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 14. Construct block walls between homes(i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather _/_/_ than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 15. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood _/_/_ gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 16. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. /_/_ 17. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. _/_/_ The 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and,irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format a_s determined by the Planning Manager, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 18. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be /_/_ manufactured products. D. Building Design 1. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowner's Association shall be submitted for /_/_ Planning Manager and Building and Safety Official review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. 2. For all residential development, provide conduit from each unit/lot and a pull box to connect /_/_ to the street. Provide interior structured wiring for each house/building with minimum Category 5 copper wire, Radio Grade 6 coaxial cable, and a central distribution panel, prior to release of occupancy (fiber-to-the building, FTTB). Plans shall be submitted for Planning Manager and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth _/_/_ from back of sidewalk. F. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home _/_/_ landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 2. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than _/_/_ 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for 3 0 P296 Project No. DRC2013-01083 Completion Date erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 3. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater / /_ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5- gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft.of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 4. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be _/_/_ continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 5. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the _/_/_ Development Code. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 6._ The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be _/_/_ included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 7. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on / /_ the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 8. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, _/_/_ the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 9. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water _/_/_ efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. G. Environmental 1. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of _/_/_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Manager in the amount of $ 581 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. H. Other Agencies • 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and _/_/_ location of mailboxes, Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 4 0 P297 Project No. DRC2013-01083 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY SERVICES DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S). I. Building and Safety Single-Family Residential Standard Conditions General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan and reverse foundation plan (when applicable); c. Floor Plan; d. Roof and Floor Framing Plan and reverse Roof and Floor Framing Plan (when applicable); e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping,and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (i.e., DRC2013-01083) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and / /_ a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers'Compensation coverage /_/_ to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. _/_f_ Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the project file number(i.e., DRC2013-01083). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Services Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits for a new residential project or major addition, the _/_/_ applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees. The applicant shall provide a copy of the School Fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permit issuance. 3. The Building and Safety Official shall provide street addresses after tract/parcel map /_/_ recordation and prior to issuance of Building Permits. 4. Construction activity shall occur in accordance with the standards as stated in Chapter _/_/_ 17.66.050 D-4 of the Development Code. 5 (0 P298 Project No. DRC2013-01083 Completion Date New Structures / / 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistive requirements. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. _/_/_ 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. _/_/_ 4. The home must be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers in accordance with NFPA 13D. _/_/_ 5. Annexation of the parcel: Annexation of the parcel into the Community Facilities District#85- _/_/_ 1 or#88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or Building Permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: The project must comply in design and constructed in accordance with the 2010 California Building and Fire Codes,the RCFPD Ordinance FD50 and the RCFPD Standards. The RCFPD ordinance, procedures & standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at www.cityofrc.us. J. Single-Family Tract Standard Conditions FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply__ 1. The public water supply and fire hydrants shall be design in accordance with RCFPD and _/ /_ CVWD Standards and Policies. 2. The private water supply (when applicable) and fire hydrants shall be design in accordance /_/_ with the RCFPD Ordinance, Standard 5-10 and the current edition of the California Fire Code. FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. Fire review and approval of the public water plans to be submitted to CVWD for permit issuance. / /_ 2. Building Permits will not be issued until public fire protection water plans are approved and _/_/_ adequate water supply is provided for construction purposes. 3. On all architectural plan sets to be submitted for building plan check provide a Site Plan that /_/_ illustrate all the proposed public and private fire hydrants located on/and within 600-feet of the project site. 4. The required fire flow for this project is calculated gallons per minute at a minimum residual _/_/_ pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with California Fire Code Appendix, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances.The required minimum fire flow for this project may be reduced by 50 percent when automatic fire sprinklers are installed. 5. Public fire hydrants located within the immediate vicinity of the proposed project may be used / /_ to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. FSC-9 Single-family Residential Sales Model homes require approved Fire District vehicle /_/_ access and water supply from a public or private water main system before construction. FCS-10 Fire Sprinklers: All structures must be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers in _/_/_ accordance with NFPA 13D and the current edition of the California residential Code. FSC-13 Alternate Method Application: Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will /_/_ review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the 6 0 0 P299 Project No. DRC2013-01083 Completion Date Fire District"Application for Alternate Method"form along with supporting documents and payment of the review fee. FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: the project must be annexed into the Community Facilities _/_/_ District #85-1 or #88-1. The annexation must be completed prior to the issuance of grading or Building Permits. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS—Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any Building Permits: 1. Public Water Supply(Domestic/Fire)Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the _/_/_ locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CVWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Standard #10-5. 2. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the _/_/_ requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #14-1. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. 3. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CVWD must be received. The applicant is responsible /_/_ for obtaining the fire flow information from CVWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services: - - PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION— Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: AU fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating _/_/_ the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Public Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access _/ /_ roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. 3. Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address _/_/_ with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street. When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. {"* P300 RESOLUTION NO. 14-28 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2013-00889, A REQUEST TO REMOVE TREES IN CONJUNCTION WITH A PROPOSED 45-LOT SUBDIVISION OF VACANT PARCEL OF ABOUT 7.16 ACRES WITHIN THE MEDIUM (M) AND LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, LOCATED BETWEEN ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND RAMONA AVENUE,AT THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC INLAND EMPIRE TRAIL, ABOUT 1,400 FEET NORTH OF BASE LINE ROAD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 1076-181-01. A. Recitals. 1. Manning Homes filed an application for Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00889 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tree Removal Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of August 2014 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on August 13, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a parcel located between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue, at the north side of the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail, about 1,400 feet north of Base Line Road; and b. The project site is a rectangular parcel with an overall area of about 312,000 square feet(7.16 acres). The overall dimensions of the site are about 1,200 feet deep(east to west) and 250 feet (north to south); and c. The project site is generally vacant with the exception of a single-family residence that was built circa 1915 that is located at the east side of the project site near Ramona Avenue;and ATTACHMENT D 0 P3O1 • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-28 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2013-00889—MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 2 d. To the west of the project site, is an equestrian/pet supplies retail store;to the north and east are single-family residences; and to the south are an apartment complex and a mobile home park; and e. According to the Zoning Map adopted by the City Council on July 18, 2012, the project site is currently within two zoning districts. The western half of the project site an area of about 147,000 square feet (about 3.37 acres) is zoned as Medium (M) Residential District. The eastern half of the project, an area of about 165,000 square feet (about 3.77 acres), is zoned as Low Medium (LM) Residential District; and f. This application is in conjunction with Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912, Development Review DRC2013-01083,Zoning Map Amendment DRC2013-00887, Minor Exception DRC2014-00161, and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00626; and g. The application includes numerous trees at various locations within the project site. The applicant submitted a Tree Survey Report, prepared by BonTerra Psomas on February 12, 2014, that included the description and health of the individual trees and their overall health and condition. The survey identified 117 of these trees as"heritage"trees which are subject to the City's tree preservation requirements as described in Section 17.80.050 of the Development Code; and h. The proposed project includes the planting of new trees on a one-to-one basis to replace the trees that are removed. The trees that are located within the Eucalyptus windrow along the north side of the project site will be replaced with new trees of a minimum 24-inch box size. These replacement trees will be in addition to the trees that are required by the Development Code for new residential development; and i. There are also numerous fruit-bearing trees within the project site that will be removed—these trees are not subject to the City's tree preservation requirements; and j. The trees are not designated as historically significant; and k. It is necessary to remove the trees in order to grade the site, and construct future single-family residences and associated improvements,which will allow economic enjoyment of the property; and I. There are a significant number of trees within the surrounding residential neighborhoods to the north, south, and east. The removal does not affect the established character of the area and the property values; and m. The trees cannot be preserved by pruning and proper maintenance or relocation rather than removal; and n. The trees do not constitute a significant natural resource of the City. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and 0 P3O2 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-28 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2013-00889 — MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 3 b. The proposed project is in accord with the objectives of the Municipal Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c. The proposed project is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. The proposed project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to. properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration,together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto,and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study,City staff determined that,with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all . comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Manager of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. 0 0 P3O3 • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-28 . TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2013-00889—MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 4 Planning Department 1) Approval is for the removal of trees in conjunction with a proposed 45- lot subdivision of a vacant parcel of about 7.16 acres within the Medium (M) and Low Medium (LM) Residential Districts, located between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue, at the north side of the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail, about 1,400 feet north of Base Line Road - APN: 1076-181-01. 2) The trees that are located within the interior of the project, but not including the trees within the Eucalyptus windrow along the north side of the project site, shall be replaced with new trees, on a one-to-one basis, of a minimum 15-gallon size. These trees are in addition to the trees that are required by the Development Code for new residential development. 3) The trees that are located within the Eucalyptus windrow along the north side of the project site, shall be replaced with new trees, on a one-to-one basis, of a minimum 24-inch box size. These trees shall be planted within the rear yards of Lots 26 through 43 and side yards of Lots 44 and 45. These trees are in addition to the trees that are required by the Development Code for new residential development. 4) This permit shall be valid for a period of 5 years, unless an extension is requested in writing at least 30 days prior to the expiration date. 5) All Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 shall apply. 6) Approval of Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00889 is contingent upon the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912, Development Review DRC2013-01083, Minor Exception DRC2014-00161, Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00626, and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2013-00887. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF AUGUST 2013. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: �A Frances Howdyshell, Chairman ATTEST: C - ?")A-&----4-7r Candyce Bu ett, Secretary • ( 0 P304 - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-28 • TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2013-00889— MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 5 I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of August 2013, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, MUNOZ, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: HOwDYSHELL ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE f. P305 RESOLUTION NO. 14-29 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA,APPROVING MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2014-00161, A REQUEST TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF INTERIOR PROPERTY LINE AND PROJECT PERIMETER WALLS THAT WILL EXCEED THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT LIMIT OF 6 FEET (BUT NOT EXCEED 8 FEET IN HEIGHT) DUE TO GRADE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN LOTS IN CONJUNCTION WITH A PROPOSED 45-LOT SUBDIVISION OF A VACANT PARCEL OF ABOUT 7.16 ACRES WITHIN THE MEDIUM (M) AND LOW MEDIUM(LM)RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS LOCATED BETWEEN ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND RAMONA AVENUE,AT THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC INLAND EMPIRE TRAIL, ABOUT 1,400 FEET NORTH OF BASE LINE ROAD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 1076-181-01. A. Recitals. 1. Manning Homes filed an application for Minor Exception DRC2014-00161 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Minor Exception request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of August 2014, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on August 13, 2014, including written and oral staff reports,together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a parcel located between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue, at the north side of the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail, about 1,400 feet north of Base Line Road; and b. The project site is a rectangular parcel with an overall area of about 312,000 square feet (7.16 acres). The overall dimensions of the site are about 1,200 feet deep (east to west) and 250 feet (north to south); and c. The project site is generally vacant with the exception of a single-family residence that was built in circa 1915 that is located at the east side of the project site near Ramona Avenue; and ATTACHMENT E P3O6 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-29 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2014-00161 — MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 2 • d. To the west of the project site, is an equestrian/pet supplies retail store;to the north and east are single-family residences; and to the south are an apartment complex and a mobile home park; and e. According to the Zoning Map adopted by the City Council on July 18, 2012, the project site is currently within two zoning districts. The western half of the project site, an area of about 147,000 square feet (about 3.37 acres), is zoned as Medium (M) Residential District. The eastern half of the project, an area of about 165,000 square feet (about 3.77 acres), is zoned as Low Medium (LM) Residential District; and f. This application is in conjunction with Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912, Development Review DRC2013-01083,Zoning Map Amendment DRC2013-00887, Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00889, and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00626; and g. The applicant is requesting a Minor Exception to allow the construction of combination walls(garden/screen walls on top of retaining walls)with a height of up to 8 feet along the rear and interior property lines of several lots within the proposed subdivision; and h. Per Table 17.48.050-1 of the Development Code, the maximum wall height of fences and walls along the rear and interior property lines is 6 feet. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan. The General Plan designation of the project site is Medium Residential and the zoning of the property is Medium (M) and Low Medium (LM) Residential District. The Minor Exception does not affect the General Plan designation, zoning designation, or the residential purpose of the project site. b. The Minor Exception is compatible with the existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. The Minor Exception will not result in a substantially larger house, an increase in lot coverage, an increase in density, or adjustments to the physical lot area of the subject lots. c. The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. The proposed walls will be located generally where there are grade differences that warrant retaining walls. Generally the natural terrain of the project site slopes from west to east. Therefore, the usual alternative, an earthen slope, is not practical because of the lack of available space in the side yards between the house(which with a few exceptions,are on the east and west sides of the house) and the property line wall. d. The granting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious properties or improvements in the vicinity. The Minor Exception will allow the applicant to construct walls that will provide adequate property screening/security and usable yard area and are similar to other walls that have been constructed for the same purpose because of similar site conditions. The walls will be consistent with the standards and guidelines of the City. 0 t P307 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-29 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2014-00161 —MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 3 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that,with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Manager of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the construction of interior property line and project perimeter walls that will exceed the maximum height limit of 6 feet(but not exceed 8 feet in height) due to grade differences between lots in conjunction with a proposed 45-lot subdivision of a vacant parcel of about 7.16 acres within the Medium (M) and Low Medium (LM) Residential Districts, located between Archibald Avenue and Ramona • , a P308 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-29 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2014-00161 —MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 4 Avenue, at the north side of the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail, about 1,400 feet north of Base Line Road -APN: 1076-181-01. 2) The wall segments that are visible to the public and/or are located along the perimeter of the project site shall be constructed of decorative masonry block such as slumpstone or stackstone or have a decorative finish such as stucco. Final design shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval during plan check. 3) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, Etiwanda Specific Plan, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 4) All Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 shall apply. 5) Approval of Minor Exception DRC2014-00161 is contingent upon the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912, Development Review_ _ DRC2013-01083, Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00889, Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00626, and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2013-00887. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF AUGUST 2014. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: S;2114R)---4A4. Frances Howdyshell, Chairman ATTEST: a1/4_, Candyce. nett-Planning Mianager I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga,do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of August 2014, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, MUNOZ, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: HOWDYSHELL ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE P309 RESOLUTION NO. 14-27 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2013-00887, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE ZONING DESIGNATION OF PART OF A PROPERTY OF ABOUT 7.16 ACRES LOCATED BETWEEN ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND RAMONA AVENUE, AT THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC INLAND EMPIRE TRAIL, ABOUT 1,400 FEET NORTH OF BASE LINE ROAD FROM LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL TO MEDIUM (M) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT IN CONJUNCTION WITH A PROPOSED 46-LOT SUBDIVISION; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT OF -APN: 1076-181-01. A. Recitals. 1. Manning Homes filed an application for Zoning Map Amendment DRC2013-00887 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Zoning Map Amendment request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of August 2014, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on August 13, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a parcel located between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue, at the north side of the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail, about 1,400 feet north of Base Line Road; and b. The project site is a rectangular parcel with an overall area of about 312,000 square feet (7.16 acres). The overall dimensions of the site are about 1,200 feet deep (east to west) and 250 feet (north to south); and c. The project site is generally vacant with the exception of a single-family residence that was built circa 1915 that is located at the east side of the project site near Ramona Avenue; and d. To the west of the project site, is an equestrian/pet supplies retail store; to the north and east are single-family residences; and to the south are an apartment complex and a mobile home park; and e. According to the Zoning Map adopted by the City Council on July 18, 2012, the project site is currently within two zoning districts. The western half of the project site, an area of about 147,000 square feet (about 3.37 acres), is zoned as Medium (M) Residential District. The eastern half of the project, an area of about 165,000 square feet (about 3.77 acres), is EXHIBIT F P310 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-27 ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2013-00887—MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 2 zoned as Low Medium (LM) Residential District as shown as Attachment A to this resolution; and f. The General Plan land use designation of the project site is Medium Residential shown as Attachment B to this resolution; and g. The change of the zoning of the project site will make it uniformly Medium (M) Residential and consistent with the General Plan designation of Medium Residential; and h. The zoning of the property to the west is Medium High (MH) Residential District. The zoning of the properties to the north is Low Medium (LM) Residential District. The zoning of the properties to the east is Low (L) Residential District. The zoning of the properties to the south (beyond the aforementioned trail) are partly Medium High (MH) Residential District and partly and Low Medium (LM) Residential District; and 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed Zoning Map Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for the logical development of the surrounding area; and b. The proposed Zoning Map Amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and c. The proposed Zoning Map Amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. P311 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-27 ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2013-00887— MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 3 c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of • Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Manager of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt Zoning Map Amendment DRC2013-00887. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF AUGUST 2014. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA % Frances Howdyshell, Chairman ATTEST: �_ 11. Candyce B r ett, Planning Manager I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of August 2014, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, MUNOZ, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: HOWDYSHELL ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE • 0 0 P312 • RESOLUTION NO. 14-30 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014-00626, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT CODE TO INCORPORATE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SUCH AS MINIMUM LOT DIMENSIONS, SETBACKS, LOT COVERAGE, ETC. FOR SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE MEDIUM (M) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for the approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00626 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Code Amendment request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of August 2014, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing August 13, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. Currently, "basic" and "optional" development standards are not provided in Tables 17.36.010-1 and 17.36.010-2, respectively, of the Development Code; and b. These standards describe the requirements for minimum lot area, minimum lot dimensions (width, depth, street frontage, etc.), building setbacks, lot coverage, etc. and are necessary in order to guide the City and applicants in developing residential projects that are consistent with the General Plan, in accordance with the objective of the applicable development district (zoning), and comply with other standards and guidelines described in the Development Code; and c. As the standards do not exist, a set of development standards have been created for incorporation into the Development Code and is shown as Attachment A to this Resolution; and d. These development standards will apply to all single-family residential projects that are proposed in the Medium (M) Residential Districts in the City except within areas of the City governed by separate specific/community plans such as Terra Vista, Victoria, and Etiwanda. In those ATTACHMENT Q • 0 0 P313 • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-30 DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014-00626 — MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 2 specific/community plans, such development standards already exist or, if they don't exist, will require separate review and action by City and, therefore, are not subject to this amendment; and e. This request is in response to a proposed single-family residential development that was proposed by Manning Homes that contemplates a 45-lot subdivision of a vacant parcel of about 7.16 acres within the Medium (M) and Low Medium (LM) Residential Districts, located between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue, at the north side of the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail, about 1,400 feet north of Base Line Road -APN: 1076-181-01; and f. In the absence of development standards for single-family residential development in the Medium (M) Residential Districts, Manning Homes would not be able to develop the property as proposed; and g. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00626 conforms to and does not conflict with the General Plan, including without limitation, the Land Use Element thereof, and will provide for development in a manner consistent with the General Plan. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth.in Paragraphs--1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed Development Code Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for the logical development of the surrounding area; and b. The proposed Development Code Amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and c. The proposed Development Code Amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that • P314 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-30 DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014-00626 —MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 3 the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081,6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Manager of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs_1, 2,_and. 3. above, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00626. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF AUGUST 2014. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: CR,-3\--c—^Dc% 3S9Al2,----Qrn Frances Howdyshell, Chairman ATTEST: - ' c " JL -- Candyce e \C-Jtt, Planning Manager I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of August 2014, by the following vote-to-wit: • P315 • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-30 DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014-00626—MANNING HOMES August 13, 2014 Page 4 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, MUNOZ, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: HOWDYSHELL ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE P316 1 l, I / 3)4139 ! 381HSA3EI 73 if) 4.7, co g 414 11 •' tto ' 0 . ; "'• '.,' _Aft,. . ;• ,,,, I.... - . - 1. awe.1,16, :Arlo* .-, i 1 11 '--..- H ,, ,,..-Jyr, R VNOWV21 _ - ' .. I imi; 40 - illiE i . . , ON _ J . ,..._......., , . , 2 NOION17811 1 11111*,=E.7 5 r'l - ' ir -t--,•" . I.. — , r .— ..... to . CO xljj .; cp . ■ - .? 2 = ..1 ••• .z.. ,ct . le .• I) . , . _ .... 1*-,.1-4. lair cn . = • iT) . ,- . ._. . ...A la skill 4, NOIONIX31 ..., ) '''--7---,— -, E Tis ti,- c..) _ a o i 1 p_:_z.-.110, 0 • fillf. IliPliii . . , ...,:.,. ,.. ,.,:.;.,, M . it' ' , I NAil Oiftyl'_. • ;- . el. '' . ,_i ......- .i , .C ri.,---O- 1) 4 rE . ., 1. % :8 1 . ex 0 , i: • , , ,' ..:k's (..) 0 N 1 .1311°Cr Wt. ' NOIM3N ,411ti- 0 -:: —,'''‘ ; '..,.,_..„,---. r , ,• ,:R .. .. ..,_ __.. 07111311431:1V , •4 co , co Z 4 415. c 1 1,..-.. , - 1 8 . 0 0 ...., 2 0 .,.., ii 0 , ATTACHMENT H •L - ' .--4 ' . P317 sudgg adIHSVI'39 I To' co : UJ cC :ra cr E. Z Ca szc 0 7:3 0 z , 4 , • 1 i ..7. c, ....,0 .„.;„ . , i7-ri- t R VNOINifal (n I . i . . C 1 tilli, e • --- , • _ 0 . i .1 , t.. . _ . — ,..... ' ,......_ , co . .., . _ ., ,. , . . , E To 1. NO-ION:721V : . , 1 = 47.'s aim. illi 0) u., , , .1.5 c .... tb - .■ x I-- 1 2 :0 (i) if, ct iiiia -. .. W LI R ill * . I • , . 0 c, -., z - t: • 4-, .... k.c. , p NoioNix37 To F', co Nam 1—ildd 0 - J NA . .c UJ ' 0 C CL 0 Z d d :2 (.) S I U w CU (I) (3/100 .4c. . - NO.LM3N C --I R f a . ) ,R__._ .,,,. . . _ . _ C.9 07VEHHOdtf 14 - .c — Ts . . 6. ,. . r E A 1 ..... - ui .. 0 .. :0 . . d i igl , . 1 ATTACHMENT I . ., - Ill P318 r ! �— _ SMH3 11 8 r 3MlHSABG l y o co S � � � Q Z Q IId , , , -L n u o y .fir: . 2 V : ( ) L. s F.2-4-..._ _.. 141,.....•i . w I '''' .' L . .' . %'.. i . I VNOWVtJ CD 0 \\,,.\\LN.. .. : --;.; iv ' . O ,- . _ . 0.. NQ!JNnyV R 11• E R O W \_. m ' im -0 . , li 0 , . - ii. x ' 3.; N .%IMMO CL 1 R ''. ......cf,,, 4. :..,,,N4..1 , . , ei , 0 ix Tr J r C 1@ >. le, .. , ,. -31AI 0 6 L • .4..zi ) ., ,.:. .,,,• . . . : ._,, sop LNO19N!X3LE7 40 - NO1 m)1t13) Yom,. AD NA° ° X '1. Ilml ' - ' ' 7---N----) t NI\ Cle 7 '' , — _ g „ , __,, ,.k1 g C . ,z ______ . \k. x v •h 2 r.L. . 'L .- . vc ,\ . s 0 cp , x. As ralHpp Q f NO1M3N j am. .4 .,___.." 1 L. O _ U7V8!HO?JV FT;5 L - E = _ L . . , t 3 8 Ts J . IC (4 '-., 1Z a ATTACHMENT J . P319 Article Ill, Chapter 17.36 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code TABLE 17.36.010-1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS Development Standard/ VL L LM M MH H Zoning District - Lot Area (minimum) 20,000 sf 7.200 sf 5,000 sf 3 ac(1) 3 ac(1) 3 ac(1) Lot Area (minimum net avg) 22,500 sf 8,000 sf 5,000 sf 3 ac)1) 3 ac(1) 3 ac(1) Lot Width (minimum) 90 ft(2) 65 ft(2) 50 ft(2) n/a n/a n/a Lot Width (corner lot) 100 ft 70 ft 50 ft n/a n/a n/a Lot Depth (minimum) 200 ft 100 ft 90 ft n/a n/a n/a Minimum Frontage 50 ft 40 ft 30 ft 100 ft 100 ft 100 ft Minimum Frontage (flag lot) 30 ft 20 ft 20 ft 50 ft 50 ft 50 ft Allowed Density(dwelling units'per acre) Minimum Density(3) n/a n/a 4 du/ac 8 du/ac 14 du/ac 24 du/ac Maximum Density 2 du/ac 4 du/ac 8 du/ac(4) 14 du/ac(4) 24 du/ac 30 du/ac Minimum Setback Front Yard (5) 42 ft(6) 37 ft(6) 32 ft)6) 37 ft(6) n/a n/a Corner Side Yard (5) 27 ft 27 ft 22 ft 27 ft n/a n/a Interior Side Yard (5) 10/15 ft 5/10 ft 5/10 ft 10 ft)7) n/a n/a Rear Yard (5) 60 ft 20 ft 15 ft 10 ft(7) n/a n/a At Interior Site Boundary (Dwelling/Accessory NR)6) 15/5(7) 15/5(7) 15/5(7) Building) Building Height(maximum in feet)(9) Primary Buildings 35 ft 35 ft 35 ft 35 ft)10) 40 ft(10) 55 ft(10) Lot Coverage(maximum lot coverage with buildings as a percentage of_the parcel or project) Lot Coverage 25% 40% 50% 50% 50% 50% Open Space Requirement(minimum percentage of open space per parcel or project) Private Open Space 300/150 sf 225/150 sf 150/100 sf 150/100 sf (Ground Floor/Upper Story) Open Space(Private and 40% 35% 35% 35% Common) Minimum Patio/Porch Depth 6 ft)11) 6 ft(11) 6 ft(11) 6 ft(11) 6 ft(11) 6 ft(11) Minimum Dwelling Unit Size(t2) - • Single-Family 1,000 sf (attached and detached) Multi-Family)13) Efficiency/Studio 550 sf Multi-Family)13) One Bedroom 650 sf ATTACHMENT K P320 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article III, Chapter 17.36 Development Standard/ VL L LM M MH H Zoning'District Multi-Family(13) Two Bedroom 800 sf Multi-Family)73) Three or More Bedrooms 950 sf Distance Between Building/Structure Fronts (8)(14)(minimum) Between buildings with no patio 30 ft 30 ft 30 ft 30 ft or recessed patio - Between patio fence/wall less 15 ft 15 ft 15 ft 15 ft than 5 feet in height Between patio fence/wall more 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft than 5 feet in height Between balconies above patio fence/wall more than 5 feet in — — 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft height Between a patio fence/wall and 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft a building wall With common patio fence/wall — — 30 ft 30 ft 30 ft 30 ft Other Miscellaneous Building Setback Requirements (8)(minimum) Building to one-story detached garage/carport or other 6 ft/15 ft 15 ft 15 15 accessory structure Building to wall or curb at 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft project entry Table Notes: (1) On existing lots of record,parcels less than 3 acres or less than the required minimum frontage may only be developed at the lowest end of the permitted density range. (2) Average width, which shall vary accordingly: VL-+/- 10 feet L LM-+/-5 feet (3) Excluding land necessary for secondary streets and arterials and in hillside areas shall be dependent on the slope/capacity factor contained in Chapter 17.52(Hillside Development Standards). (4) Developing multi-family in the LM district and single-family in the M district at the maximum density requires compliance with Standards for Higher Residential Densities as outlined in Subsection 17.36.010.D. (5) Setbacks are measured between the structure and curb face in front yards and corner side yards. Setbacks are measured between the structure and property line in rear yards and interior side yards. (6) Average setback, which shall vary+/-5 feet. (7) Add 10 feet if adjacent to VL, L,or LM district. (8) Applies to buildings two stories and taller in height.Add.10 more feet for each story over two stories. (9) In hillside areas,heights shall be limited to 30 feet. (10) Limit one story within 100 feet of VL or L district for multiple-family dwellings. (11) Free and clear of obstructions. (12) Senior citizen projects are exempted from this requirement. (13) To assure that smaller units are not concentrated in any one area or project,the following percentage limitations of the total number of units shall apply: 10% for efficiency/studio and 35% for one bedroom or up to 35% combined. Subject to a Conditional Use Permit,the Planning Commission may authorize a greater ratio of efficiency or one-bedroom units when a development exhibits innovative design qualities and a balanced mix of unit sizes and types. (14) "Front"is defined as the face of the building or unit with the major glass area and/or major recreation area and may include access to that private recreation area. This access may or may not relate to the primary entrance to the building that faces the street or drive;therefore,some buildings may have more than one front. 17.36-3 P321 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Article Ill, Chapter 17.36 g. Jogging/walking trails with exercise stations. 4. For each one hundred (100) units above the first two hundred (200) units, another set of recreational amenities as described in Subsection 17.122.040M.3 above shall be provided. 5. Other recreational amenities not listed above may be considered subject to Planning Commission review and approval. 6. Related recreational activities may be grouped together and located at any one area of the common open space. 7. Dispersal of recreational facilities throughout the site shall be required for development with multiple recreational facilities. 8. All recreation areas or facilities required by this Section shall be maintained by private homeowners associations, property owners, or private assessment districts. Single-family residential development within VL, L, LM, HR, and OS zoning districts shall have public or private streets designed to the approved standards of the City. TABLE 17.36.010-2 OPTIONAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS fi Zo'ning Dl§trict. A t. 4 VL , +. gy,%1, f L$ - . ., .. . ..� t, . . :Alf Minimum Site Area (Gross) 5 ac 5 ac 5 ac 5 ac Dwelling Units per Acre Up to 8 Up to 14 Up to 24 Up to 30 Minimum Dwelling Unit Size See Table 17.36.010-1 Single-Family and Multi-Family Public Street Setback 42 ft avg 42 ft avg 42 ft avg 47 ft avg Vary±5ft Vary±5ft Vary±5ft Vary±5ft Private Street or Driveway Setback 15 ft avg 5 ft 5 ft 5 ft Vary t5 ft Corner Side Yard 10 ft 5 ft — — Interior Side Yard — 10 ft(1)(2) Interior Site Boundary 15/5 ft 20/5 ft(1) 20/5 ft(1) 20/5 ft)1) (Dwelling Unit/Accessory Building) Residential Building Separations See Table 17.36.010-1 Height Limitations 35 ft(3) 35 ft)3) 40 ft(3) 50 ft(3) Private Open Space 300/150 sf 225/150 sf 150/100 sf 150/100 sf (Ground Floor/Upper Story) Open Space (Private and Common) 45% 40% 40% 40% Minimum Patio/Porch Depth E ft(4) 6 ft(4) 6 ft(4) 6 ft(4) Recreation Facility Required per Section 17.32.040 Table Notes: (1) Add 10 feet if adjacent to VL,L, or LM district. "-- - -----"':d pursuant to Subsection 17.36.010.D. ATTACHMENT L 17.36-5 P322 Article Ill, Chapter 17.36 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code (3) Limit one story within 100 feet of VL or L district for multi-family dwelling units. (4) Fee and Wear of obstructions. 17.36-6 P323 TABLE 17.36.010-1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS(DRAFT) Development Standard/Zoning L LM Mhsi. M.ttet MH H VL District Lot Area(minimum) 20,000 sf 7.200 sf 5,000 sf 4,000 sf 3 ac i" 3 ac"' 3 ac"' Lot Area(minimum net avg) 22,500 sf 8,000 sf 5,000 sf 4,000 sf 3 ac"' 3 ac 4" 3 ac"' Lot Width(minimum) 90 ft a' 65 ft"' 50 ft"' 45 ft n/a n/a n/a Lot Width(corner lot) 100 ft 70 ft 50 ft 50 ft n/a n/a ' n/a Lot Depth(minimum) 200 ft 100 ft 90 ft 80 ft n/a n/a n/a Minimum Frontage 50 ft 40 ft 30 ft 30 ft 100 ft 100 ft 100 ft Minimum Frontage(flag lot) 30 ft 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft 50 ft 50 ft 50 ft Allowed Density(dwelling units per acre) Minimum Density"' n/a n/a 4 du/ac 8 du/ac 8 du/ac 14 du/ac 24 du/ac Maximum Density 2 du/ac 4 du/ac 8 du/ac(4) 14 du/ac 14 du/ac 24 du/ac 30 du/ac Minimum Setback Front Yard"' 42 ft"' 37 ft"' 32 ft'°' 27 ft 1b1 37 ft"' n/a n/a Corner Side Yard 15' 27 ft 27 ft 22 ft 17 ft 27 ft n/a n/a Interior Side Yard"' 10/15 ft 5/10 ft 5/10 ft 5/5 ft 10 ft"' n/a n/a Rear Yard"' 60 ft 20 ft 15 ft 15 ft 10 ft'" n/a n/a At Interior Site Boundary NR 0" 15/5 p1 15/5 O1 15/5"' (Dwelling/Accessory Building) Building Height(maximum in feet)", - - Primary Buildings 35 ft I 35 ft 35 ft I 35 ft I 35 ft 10' I 40 ft"°' ) 55 ft 0°i LotCoverage(maximum lot coverage with buildings as a percentage of the parcel or project) Lot Coverage I 25% I 40% 50% I 50% 50% I 50% 50% Open Space Requirement(minimum percentage of open space per parcel or project) Private Open Space(Ground 300/150 sf 225/150 sf 150/100 sf 150/100 sf Floor/Upper Story) Open Space(Private and Common) 40% 35% 35% 35% 35% Minimum Patio/Porch Depth 6ft"" 6ft"" 6ft"" 6ft011 6ft"" 6ft"" 6ft"" Minimum Dwelling Unit Size" Single-Family 1,000 sf (attached and detached) Multi-Family"" Efficiency/Studio 550 sf Multi-Family"" 650 sf One Bedroom Multi-Family"" Two Bedroom 800 sf Multi-Family"" 950 sf Three or More Bedrooms Distance Between Building/Structure Fronts 0," minimum) . Between buildings with no patio or — — 30 N - 30 ft 30 ft 30 ft recessed patio Between patio fence/wall less than 5 — — 15 N 15 ft 15 ft 15 ft feet in height Between patio fence/wall more than — — 20 N - 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft 5 feet in height Between balconies above patio — — 20 N - 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft fence/wall more than 5 feet in height Between a patio fence/wall and a — — 20 N - 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft building wall With common patio fence/wall — — 30 ft - 30 ft 30 ft 30 ft Attachment Vi P324 Other Miscellaneous Building Setback Requirements (minimum) Building to one-story detached 6 ft/15 ft - 15 ft 15 15 Building to wall or curb at project 20 ft - entry 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft Table Notes: (1) On existing lots of record,parcels less than 3 acres or less than the required minimum frontage may only be developed at the lowest end of the permitted density range. (2) Average width,which shall vary accordingly: • VL-+/10 feet L B LM-+/5 feet (3) Excluding land necessary for secondary streets and arterials and in hillside areas shall be dependent on the slope/capacity factor contained in Chapter 17.52(Hillside Development Standards). (4) Developing multi-family in the LM district and single-family in the M district at the maximum density requires compliance with Standards for Higher Residential Densities as outlined in Subsection 17.36.010.D. (5) Setbacks are measured between the structure and curb face in front yards and corner side yards. Setbacks are measured between the structure and property line in rear yards and interior side yards. (6) Average setback, which shall vary+/5 feet. (7) Add 10 feet if adjacent to VL,L,or LM district. (8) Applies to buildings two stories and taller in height.Add 10 more feet for each story over two stories. (9) In hillside areas,heights shall be limited to 30 feet. (10) Limit one story within 100 feet of VL or L district for multiple-family dwellings. (11) Free and clear of obstructions. (12) Senior citizen projects are exempted from this requirement. (13) To assure that smaller units are not concentrated in any one area or project,the following percentage limitations of the total number of units shall apply: 10%for efficiency/studio and 35%for one bedroom or up to 35%combined Subject to a Conditional Use Permit,the Planning Commission may authorize a greater ratio of efficiency or one-bedroom units when a development exhibits innovative design qualities and a balanced mix of unit sizes and types. (14) "Front"is defined as the face of the building or unit with the major glass area and/or major recreation area and may include access to that private recreation area. This access mayor may not relate to the primary entrance to the building that faces the street or drive;therefore,some buildings may have more than one front. (15) For single-family residential development in the Medium(M)Residential District,these standards shall apply. (16) For multi-family residential development in the Medium(M)Residential District,these standards shall apply. • 8//.34Y Pc fi e��d e4/°, P325 July 25, 2014 To: Planning Department, City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. BOX 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca . 91729 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Re : DCR #2013-0087 JUL 29.2014 2013-01083 SUBTT 18912 RECEIVED - PLANNING File No . : Tract 18912; proposed Development of 45/46 Single family Homes by Manning Homes & Watermill Homes Location : between Ramona Ave. and Archibald Ave, north of bike trail Gentlepeople : I am not able to attend your Public Hearing set for August 13, 2014 regarding the above captioned matter. My concerns are expressed in this writing . The above captioned proposed development will substantially interfere with the use and enjoyment of my property located at 9801 Yale Dr. , adjacent to the proposed site (P. S. ) . 1 . ) The Low Medium (LM) density zone that currently exists over the middle and eastern portion of the P. S . should be extended westward, over the rest of the site and it is requested that the Medium Residential zoning designation be changed to Low Medium Residential (LM) . This change would reduce congestion, noise, pollution, and traffic . The lower zone would be consistent with the neighboring (LM) density zones that will lead in and out of the P. S. . The area of the P. S. that is currently designated (M) abuts Archibald Ave . , but there will be no ingress or egress onto busy Archibald from this or any area of the P. S . and thus no need for the Medium Residential designation . I object to changing any zoning designation from LM to M. 2 . ) Construction work should be limited to reasonable times; after 8 am and before 5 pm, and not on weekends or holidays . ATTACHMENT N P326 3 . ) Construction equipment and vehicles should be fitted with smog and noise reduction devices . 4 . ) Parking for employee and construction vehicles should be restricted and away from neighboring homes . 5 . ) A common area should be developed on the P. S . so that pre existing small common areas and parks outside the P. S . are not crowded with the residents of the P. S . (example : I pay homeowner' s fees for the upkeep of the small park across the street from my property and it was not intended to be used by a multitude of non H. O.A. members . ) Please mention and discuss my concerns at your upcoming meeting on August 13th, and before City Council for final action. Thank you for your time and attention . Very truly your, Ai Lun "Ellene" Tseng 9801 Yale dr . Rancho Cucamonga, Ca . 91701 P327 1 PROOF OF SERVICE 1 . At the time of the service I was at least 18 years of age and 2 not a party to this legal action . 3 2 . My residence or business address is : P. O. Box 9615 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca . 91701 4 3. I mailed a copy of a letter dated 7/25/2014 to Planning 5 Department, City of Rancho Cucamonga re: SUBTT 18912 from Ellene Tseng as follows : 6 a . [X] Mail . I am a resident or employed in the county where 7 the mail occurred 8 (1) I enclosed a copy in an envelope AND 9 (a) [x] deposited the sealed envelope with the United 10 States Postal Service with the postage fully prepaid 11 (b) [ ] placed the envelope for collection and mailing 12 on the date and at the place shown in items below following our 13 ordinary business practices . I am readily familiar with this 14 business' s practice for collecting and processing correspondence 15 for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is place for 16 collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course 17 of business with the United States Postal Service in a sealed 18 envelope with postage fully prepaid. 19 (2) The envelope was addressed and mailed as follows : 20 (a) Name of person served: Planning Department, City 21 of Rancho Cucamonga, Ca . 22 (b) Address on envelope : P.O. BOX 807 Rancho Cucamonga, 23 Ca . 91729 24 (c) Date of mailing: July 28, 2014 25 (d) Place of mailing: Rancho Cucamonga, Ca . 26 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state 27 of California that the foregoing is true d corr.ectI 28 Date : 7,/zs/,y ,� albs g1379 /P ea:wig C'of j28 MANNING CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOMES AUG 122014 Tract 18912 RECEIVED - PLANNING 45 Single Family Residences 7074 Ramona Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. Letter of Suonort fa/2 /br • ATTACHMENT 0 P329 MANNING HOMES CRY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AUG 12 2014 Tract 18912 RECEIVED - PLANNING 45 Single Family Residences 7074 Ramona Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. Letter of Support C. /..a. L,.I/ (Name) P330 MANNING CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOMES AUG 12 2014 Tract 1$912 RECEIVED - PLANNING 45 Single Family Residences 7074 Ramona Avenue Rancho Cucamonga,Ca. Letter of Support Dan el Itic e111re (Name) P331 MANNING CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQq HOMES RECENAUG ED 111014 - PLANNING Tract 18912 45 Single Family Residences 7074 Ramona Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. Letter of Support 303E (goz (Name) P332 MANNING ��'OF RANCHO CUCg180NG,q HOMES AU6 12 2014 RECEIVED - PLANNING Tract 18912 45 Single Family Residences 7074 Ramona Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. Letter of Support )44 AgLLA,vv ? P333 MANNING HOMES ant OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AUG 12 2014 Tract 18912 RECEIVED - PLANNING 45 Single Family Residences 7074 Ramona Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. Letter of Sunnort t rcq beSAch (Name) P334 t~ C CITY OF MANNING RANCHO CUC A HOMES NION(3q AUG 12 2014 Tract 18912 RECEIVED - PLANNING 45 Single Family Residences 7074 Ramona Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. Letter of Support ALA/ I ivy E STRRJM (Name) • P335 MANNING JUN..122014 HOMES CRY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AUG 12 2014 Tract 18912 PfoL: Draw#:_____ Acct No.:45 Single Family a nc� P.0 RECEIVED - PLANNING 7074 Ramona Avenue Fa Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. Office : Letter of Support trAA) Cdi 4n16{41C14 ardfiS (Name) P336 1 MANN IMANNING HOMES CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AUG 12 2014 raft Re RECEIVED -as Single Family y Residences PLANNING 7074 Ramone.Avenue vrti7 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. Letter of 3unnort kite, /12 fl-Crifitb- (Name) P337 MANNING CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HOMES AUG 11 1014 Tract 18912 RECEIVED - PLANNING 45 Single Family Residences 7074 Ramona Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. Letter of Suuuort `V Z1 Ac (Name) P338 C. C --CITY-Off RANCHO-CUCAMONGA- - MANNING HOMES AUG 1 2 2014 RECEIVED - PLANNING Tract 18912 45 Single Family Residences 7074 Ramona Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. • Letter of Support tAfL • i(U-9CS tUf>01a, (Name) • P339 C C . SAN MANN 1 N G CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGq HOMES AUG 121014 Tract 18912 RECEIVED _ PLANNING 45 Single Family Residences 7074 Ramona Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. Letter of Support • .,�QtsgntQet?Ja � etti ril) (Name) P340 MANNING C�'DFRAHCHO CUCAMONGA 0CI°SI* HOMES AUG 12 2014 RECEIVED - PLANNING Tract 18912 45 Single Family Residences 7074 Ramona Avenue Rancho Cucamonga,Ca. Letter of Support AO (Name) P341 :—=.--= _--_._—=--_----=.-:-61TY0E-RA ICHOCUCANfONGA _ MANNING HOMES AUG 1 2 2014 RECEIVED - PLANNING Tract 18912 45 Single Family Residences 7074 Ramona Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. Letter of Support d i'llr� rat ( r, (Name) P342 ---- ------ artomui MANNING HOMES AUG 111014 RECEIVED - PLANNING Tract 18912 45 Single Family Residences 7074 Ramona Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. Letter of Support (Name) ?e'Ffirey S . Of son r 1 -N • P343 -"K• ?; PF_RAWBOLUCANIONGA- _____ MANNING AUG 1 2 2014 MES V RECEIED - PLANNING HO Tract 18912 45 Single Family Residences • 7074 Ramona Avenue • Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. Letter of Sunuort -----•-- TE • l'We LaDa 1.4 • (Name) ) • P344 COY OFRucb MANNING HOMES AUG 121014 RECEIVED .1 PLANNING Tract10912- 45 Single Family Residences 7074 Ramona Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. Letter of Support D : t revm €tctw e1 (Name) P345 • ===.- MANNING---- —�ITYDFRAFICHDCUCAMONGA -- MANNING AUG 122014 HOMES RECEIVED - PLANNING Tract 18912 • 45 Single Family Residences 7074 Ramona Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. • Letter of Support Lisa L . g41a (Name) • • P346 ,(271.6/A.iiett, eLx-,64/./eLe . • • • •...,_ ,. .„... , , ,...,.,.„......i;.:..5„.........,,..4;::„.„:„......,,,,,„.„..,.;,,,.....,,,....,,,,,,,N.,,,)•;;-.17.,.....,.-,14;,..,7-..k?.....i.•,,.....-.. . . ,,',,.,..,:,,..„.i...75i--,:-....,,,tie,-?•:.....,r-t,•:.c,...i,,:•?,,-.:41,J;•,11.-1;1.:;tA.':'cs;,•:;•_TI,'T,"\;7P'. •',.•0 r'V.1•;:.'•t.-.'..--•;'`'.'42.' ''''-'":-vi,•.-',•. ,'-''-':"i'•!. .112.''?.t.-',.'t A‘I'''' •'• ••••••-• 7:`-;-'(''';'''.•\"'..",1;.1"..-:::\'':;'....;.!4-:7--:•-•:?•;.''sl"'••••:-..!'"*'14:7:!.::::;.4"'"Nf>i'-ft:Iil•:•,j7'i'r9;:i•%:."'•"-":•'4.-'.,1..°"....?•14%-;:. ...-'7••.".:!;.70b..a."2`•-c.r.i.;'.71:',. ,',.,--:?':r.,;..---1': ".•-'• . i"•?irf:".•‘■': ■:::.71:.t.....je.-••Ct.,...;'..-i'‘‘,'...7.':.`," ' - .r•.1.+,"1j-'-' •.`;41-71.-;fi;•-...;;S•••:•-•7-elt•?.:r-:1..i4.; V4*-7;:'''.-....if,-,:•.c.-1.-,--.-qr-.1‘...--...4L.:‘.' ! -.',...,,• . •••,-7.-:--,-.....• „i'.....'.„ „--1.•:.••.:,..,'-:- ,- , , -,•.., i■,,, - -- -•„'i...”),....-e?.1.--. .e:7;::-..--.i■-...c.--...,:'71...:-.,r.:',:•?„.1.1 :,ci.:-..,:-.42.0'., ;- .4..;-•..:•.'..'; = 4;;C:Y.4,.!, '-!.•;.4::•%,,. • :' . . 2 "` f,";% ' ' ' , , - •--. • ., ;....:' ::'..1•7,1•:-.4'.•"•.!.?....''..4•r4.1%.";j:!c'....!;:is:• .,i■:.`:•: ti.:4''''■:;....4,•,S.*::.;',•t•cri.:-4,•;;;!;./,,,...,...,,-,2•,:i in..-..!:•;,,,1 . -..1.,,,?;•„ , • -.. . ' ;''. ', ,. . , , . ' -: , •' • ''.1.::14;':.';'!'il:-71 ,::= -:•'11‘..,'"•.--tr...i.,,•-i.$, ?4,..=::".t.1,•,.>„,,:11.5s,'It A,■-..c.f";;,.,3;,.:;,■,;.t;''...1...-::,..'%'..,■1;"--:-,:. ••-.• ....2' . .• ...•' 'r•- - - - . . • : -. -. — .,..0,:,,.....,c,-,..f.,:•,-,-.;::•.,,..;i:e-i,..;,,,,,.;.,7 1• ,••,••.- .,..•,:...;...-V-.;.Z,VS,4:41t 4,l':!.'VV.:::'.;."::c7•••i%•••4••'•,..'•i 11•••■li,:: . '•,, ..),V•.,', •,..' • .,, • ,• . , •' ,•• • • , P. 1%-.......:;7/t;.;•.;•;:=1W73,;•,..?..f7c:4:0 `../..,-,i',1.11:1 :'4...?,:•.:i.,.'•,"--4..,4,0%-...''. 7;.--,.!••,.." , • , .,.• ; . . , . . ;. • , .,. . . , r(-:',.W.-4:(•:•,,*-,-..".".t. fl•'.•''.."'-7.'".•i'■"''',';*.!•7r....- .:`;•••'7 ,5, ,I.,/V...:,;-t7,;*-4ii i,..•....'•.-... • *• - • ;•.•,.. , . ... ' .„ , , - ., .- - q:!;: ,,. , ,',...,-;.0..;:‘•:'•-ii,::'•:::-::.; .,=;;;n1;!=.:•.c..1....qi.,!,47.?•.-2,;!- li'::;4..f;f..,e:"- .. '' '.. • - . - • . • ••, ' , ' .- - .:.• .. -.. • • . , .,,•••. . '.. ...:',.,•:•-..`.?..f -..;-•.':),. .;:‘,.,..v'st• 4--;"..T., (;.,..:-••-•'*■!--.,;;?•,;,,Itt;11';1•'•;'!.. •. . ; . ..., - • : . .: .' ,' • , - •-.• ' .••• • .•,-.1,;.::, N, • .;-;-,,,--...,•:••••,,;•e-. -;',stli.:-.,...;:,..t.1, .,-,..!..:4r4:.‘7.--je i;•;0,71.-i;411.:--;fol.i,N".4..- • ' ' •, '•• . . •• . ' •••--.' • .. -,• . .. . • ., ',-...- r';',CA,-11••••••'.t! ,6--C.'•,..S•-0----i-v,--,',..."•,---•:' :,-,,,r..:41. •,•?,‘. •.,...%,,-....tilv. ,...-.,, -••, . - - , . ; ...- . 4-,....., ..„.... -, -.,„ ! . . .'-,-• , .-... ,t•.,_ •,;,.,, , :;..■7,721,-,..Itg•':•,,V•. ••74”}" ,i;:e4r....)-• ";.$:,•7:••••;:•,!..,••••••;•14,':,04-•,::-4.•••1•1--; •,,,.,....,,,,..,-."...:,•',-••.', :.:,.4..r.•:;.,%::-'-,'.4.-.'''.":-•:::".'.-...;,:::.-,e.•: • .' ''. :r'..::,: ';', -' '-, ' f '.':::-i'A. !"-:.;.:1,'f!'?',Et•-i%";•\?;r•-i!.7et;.:7:,174f,i."•:/,,•''LV-i47-.41.3.1i.:4.•-;1.;"i.1:741.-/'•••..-.2.-:;.■•;•4-"f";.•;.-1\ii.-7.7,L:i.!i'f.:•:"41.0,..ii.;;•:::Pf,.2;..,,`•,--,;i.4". ...,••:...-.7..., r. : ", 4 1,.,,. ,- . - '''.1.:-.,■;..',,Z,1;1"■;:gT7,:4;,e-:‘.',7!,ii.i',.,i.;k*:),-.A;:!.7.47;;J■ZIVir.t.rif,i-•;;!:,.:-;';:1-...S7.).?-k-.71 ,-.14i i`7.'.i'Z''it.,7;fi'i",•;;.:3:'i..',40 •L':-:" 1.P../ : -.- '\.' L ';1 .:....,:• . .- ';.;''2.=•- - ' ::,•:!.:7,"...:•,;:7,:.•".1■1'4:-",lii',. ..;;C■V•7)."S.I`r'''''.;•*•:?.?.irtii!''..i. ...q1,1:1•.‘.'1.nigif?.1;•5‘rfri.;."...t. f.;1,7,,:•';1.•.-y 1/4,:f.;,:i...?..',..447:1-,'-.;,7...1::,,--1;:-, ..-.:.:....;.:I-',,r;.,i:•1/4,.. .r.,,..),i-.:..-,,,_.. , . 7. .;:•-••?:.4X:-,^..,4N.'7;4--::4■11'4,i14 4S.L10.`Ltii;.!frn.!..."'e,A,t,..:A 4.•,,',.•:.'1.Cr' ••■11-:•iri,"-•,:44.!.....11.P.1...4':IP:.T2`1.."!:- .4-4-.11"...'lt,.1::':il.::.;;,'•r•.'■‘.:::•': :','•*fl'•••'.%';'-i,a4-,'i.k.'it?.••11-_A-;•.i.-:''''--?‘;1: .'2 . • -.''-.f...::;.ei...‘'-;:f..;I'i••.:-..-;15';'.1.- '41.• :`!tlIS.J.■-'1`-'-'A-•4:::-..:,•;.:.:.11,1.4...?.'.!:!..„7"eti:?1;‘.'44in.7it; ',Ar:ANCe.744*.ii•".::'i'',.. .•.'1;>4,:...iL,■,'..",..'4,:.:1 j.......I.s-./ir-...:?,.•,,-A.',.,t...q0..7.1.-',.-,.!• . •!.:•-s ,'••'` ' --:';',..2.1.',..)/i''.1;.!iY.,1'4411;,'-tvi".--,...`..-: !;.::::fi'4'.: :.•-1-.):;.-If4.1.j•5.i','''■;"..:1T.••••%;3.3`41!.i i.'.::t■-14.;".:;:":4'1'11.::r.!;ik:71..7.;6::ri:r.-:. ..-?,■••;:•- •'.7•":4.4,'''';'!*-1.i..:7-1.-:7`af.q:1`j;'•'..-7" ;- '- • !. .:.-':.1...,'::;;.f./..:'.e!.1,;.4'.•:, ■"..i.,,:.:..i■.‘;'6';;7‘,4..i.r‘..,,"::;•'.'.; ,I,Z!.."..:;!?='',Ii'.f.'*;;-r.1.:..:.'Jikj?:oi..?:.ir7:0,-.;,.....!;,'iiaci+f,i:;'4,4.i:t -,).ii.'.';.tiA'--..'''..i.- aP:1■'''...::-.•!!:?..17.1.'r...:',.*T.,?...;:+;:.-;:' :•..'' . . .•, •;;r.., :.;`,.:64:4.,...‘..c:',.,..'";;;.•,:stt,i..14-.''';•"7:-;,'.1-:.',"'. ,:'ft•-trit. ':.•••••,e's:'. -2..:' .f ,7!';' ,-7,. 4-.1• :`•••••;',.-4f.„-- ;-'.‘,.`--:-:.•"-t.:_'.1'.1:?:-.44:::.,f,.,".--,...:'"!: !,' ;.,,, ;-...;•;;! :t.:.•;,•!..,..,...4...-.,4-,?:•,,i-•:;!-sfy.":•-•,:•-•;g!,,•;,,.(p.,•:..7.1;t4,";*;r,?.!•;4'''.:-,-;;;•; --•.,1,••`-•.-;;;.'i-.).';.;-'../, e ',!•;tkx,z).:r; !;•,)•,,-,., ,...., ,L::-■..,....,-. . .;-••-?..-11' ,:.,t4,...?;-;_lw;_r.,•:-,',/i..41.4-,..1+.-;..i.,.',1-:e,•;14-7-..••:.'1".. 6-..13;!:".".7‘1",,V,t,,,,L,__,40,4...t:!•:.;14 ir.:1;i1,,,itg..,,J..: ,;.,.4,;;..v.tti!.74' ,,,,;.,/,:.-.4.-:-;1%'.1,r`..:7",;,r,-;.4,1,. .':„.17:11:3,;■2%,q..'■:",:;;.,re -f.i.t.e..1kty: - •,-,-i.ntik,..;;t4;,;•••;,';.•':41.77':/.ti-,.''...-`). --..t.•„ .• i-e--:V...+':■-•4 LI,v• /1"';'!fki"4.-tfil•::.• ')r,,....0",i-1:i1Ald"--;•■7•!.'•••k,k.:',;.1-41Y•ii-Pa...Y•••,••••:....i'1,4!--41r4:•,•1.■•'.4:4,•-.•• ..S.x. •Z•.*•,..",,, :IP'f:".r,'4:■-•4'IP'cl."..-t^/:-.1h."...f,",...t,,t ,-.24,....1„,..e..5,4! ,...,...y,:„.;4.?1,),.-,q,...-,...,1,.., ,,.i i t,,,...-,...rj-,..:!•....,,,-.1,;-.,-;,..;.tc-;;,.,.i.;,..,-....?.-,......j1-.2?".#,-•_,,,...--....,...;i.r-•,', ••••■N.:-f,..4...., . , ...-i-;',...tr.',•.i,,,,,;;;;,T,*,--:t;.1 f...t.4.1.1°W.,.. '',..;.:•;',..'51Qc%,„1,:41'...t?:..t--....%•.,,,ilt,-4,-..-t 7-,i'v-lib,.04,,,... .,..cs-;'",:...:'•;'!-e',4•-•"--:.-1.•:-...•••-•tt-`1,-....r.3..4..Z•J.:-.4'...-:i! ,::,' ',-.4.....-l'i i.4....,"•-• • :.,1,0%,..1.2,r......;;;;Ic:ix,,,%4.,i...,_,,•••,..;1,..e.1- •14i'43-•,,,.1'4'',2,".:JA.r.-,'i....'•,V.4..y..I.I.A;%.1 •!r•'‘i•-if:.-!•11111•,:i-1;..:t:------%="e•1.-•;•I`:-..A^.4.1--4 tl'''7•4:1-::!'-':-,,.:iP.-;:-i•14.-:.:••-•,q,---• '-'1 l'---.:•1:`) %4• ' 'Ii171 .-::51•1-3`.V.i.-X•r!t!i`..0''-iWt.-1" ...;.-'-r--0:-U-4----u'On47";:1--1!=:/:----1.!■,..::".-{e:14, •5-1-: ::':'4'.0.1"2.'1;•.7-,i'V ti-t.17-.-1- 14!i,!.;:t':•15,i•kl'!--'.'--.:;;X:C-•;•.!:'-•;'!1: :./... • ,_, :,,,„,..;.71.7.-'1,`,4i;.,36i:sie.:::),=`;;.:...ri).:•';;;;:-;1,ri,i..1"--0.;....,..!....&-A,7,12,--1?-, ,%.!;"• ;4 ,•, ;;•,,t;,f,'.I'rsv..•P i,,';,;7',',--:.?:- ■. 5i........,,...„74.-..•..71,; 7.7.,.;;."!..,:,•;;-4,;;;:i..:;:.P.-.I--;;;;Al.41"2").:';',')1 , ....;;;,•.,...A..f.:-.L•i7,12i,,...;',..'•-,(7;iiiff.,..,,,t,'••5-,0:-;-;,,-;,-v4r.•;,,,....'-';.',, '...•- :=;,-1,./.,,-,!•-'i,,::,1%;,...-•rr,...•..4:•••,,;7- ,;•..!..;......:f.'.2: •. ' 1--;,e.".1'.';'.0.-'‘-,e1 '.:1■;,,14:trlipeti-PO'''f' -'4..:• ;:• :41-'.'''Y''-". t...'crri•tti:..M.07.-1'.:1:""."V'"'1,"N•.::=1::itt.f-•"N"-•.!4- . -r.,,..--1.-. i.•,••''•- '•--- ;•:':.---,1,...t,7:-.'-.tr.i•,:-- • %.-.•.:•••• ;;..6'1'''..'..;;;;''' .-:-..,•••-• r.;,...,..7:;;..---ri,...rgY. ,*17,40,-.4r414.74°,••.1'7.".:•.; •.,.n We).''s- i;.e,K ■...1.4.,`, ..,A.. .,.._,f4.:. , • •••■•,i...,t :-..-.,,,........:.,-,,,:;.:.:77 •7' ,..,-'...-",.'i",7,?.,,,',-.;.•.:.t•-....,; ,r,;;;21y-;,..,....•,,,,!•15,:;;%•:."-,F.-•-.1,.;:.1.-,k.:5.- ..:;-;-;.••;■ i- 7,:74.!:'••,,!•-•,2.,•••r,t,•7.,-- 7::,.;`,7•.'" %:.-..... ''- ...'!_`' ;.-- •':- •••;d:. .. ::..''..t•-•'. *.".:-;'"t''.'t!'.!5.4 ,:?••:'.':-..." ;':•i'-‘.:1'7.•it.71.:••=7."-eri-11 .‘';'1.17:'•`;` 7', --,"';‘'.'''.••::.lz•t".. ': ' • - -' - '. ..' -•..-If'-',',•••"•,. ' .-.:•,,::';•"..;,"•-..:--.',.•.. ;'. .-..?,•;,',.,-:,.:::tf.e.,%;.,-;,.....-.-4-t;:,:- _•:•-,:,;.:,..b., ,..L,:t...,„s:,-..c.::‘,.„.,..,-y.,..7.,..t,.• ,•! ._ •,...„17,-,., • ),";,'"'7-1-;•`'''''••7 .• •. .";'•;"-'7". .';.Ls.- 1.-..% ...t."'''..-..• .::. . ,.;;•!.:' -•-,.;••''..-1,"14.,'.../.14 ":f..,..'''N,'""a.:•75:, ,„•1":-:.t.•;,-,;.V:':',.`•i.t;,-".•','"" '-- c • • ' • --''t L?':I': '-',.. -":..--", ' .' " '' .• -,•,..',:7.,:^•:. •;"•,..•.',.!'7'..,-?•;-".'-'..-:'"...4-....".',--r•-_•':cf,":-...-i,.'-'it-"A-•c7..,,-**.■:'-_,_s 7'*.-Lt•,44;.7:. ir- -,, ,', '-.:::-.,,,,' ;',„.7.'•-,,.,-,..,•,.. . - . , ,-,s--.-,•....•,•.;•-•.. *- • , ::::,..r.,-. .. ,-:•11.;-.....;..".•-.'„,,,,...•,.::.;;(-,:.."4---*1.-.-x.41,..:--,..st.-4..0;32,:41:11. ,e4f.-,"."-!.-_,•.F.'"T.,. , : ." ' . -• ..':•'• ,-;1,;.4,..„,•-..!.. . ,...-:1,0.:: .,:...i.. .., ".....,... i'.••.:..,•;,. L`.1`.; i.'.,:.',I.',:::-..4! ...•,....s !...'.:‘;',:••,1.,.........';'..r.".7:4'1'f....:••■t'''i:.;',.:,:I.1..... '.*... ,'' ..', -.‘7'.!....1-;,!..."'. ', - .",..', ••.'. ' .. '..' •',. C‘ .• •• - . r,.,:.-'.....,.•-..L C;-• ;: --c';;2.-...rj,. e., t",..s.) g,e,k1-t'.;V:.--,.."'" • -' '' ' . •'. - 1 '•"`• •- . "• 7 ' ' - :. .. * •' - • -, 1 „.;)-,•':.!.,..1',.“.;*71'-.,..,..,:-..',"';..•.',.•••.S. . ,.,,..-;_......tt-.. ;:,•,i'..1;;,-,A,.:%:1,...."..c :,••'',, ,,;- , • ,,. „ ...,„ . , .. , , ••: ... ,,•. . • , • • • %-••\ ,?, .,;.•.•-•,".4'..i.;,,•;•..,,,...• : .•,"11.,..;:`,!,,,..":,•!;,.•• •":4:_:r.•ii••••if?fj•E`-,!•:‘,..,,f14;‘. 1P,`;•1., ': ,. ',- ■•1. ,. • - , • - . ;' • . • !-- :- 7 '•. • :•••.• ,,,•:;.:4,',t110,,;Al..;•••••••2,,f.,t';'•'-',..%....,:;!.',-;,••••,...,,i3.....'.1f••••'•:%.1,:,.;•41, 4• •"- ._ •, -•., - - - ',.••:,.'•., '• •' ', • ,. -...."._,'•,. : ' r4 • e 4.-..:•%;:,; :',,•:•,•••-.•!•:.-...;. .,•.: .",,: :‘,.,7••..; -...;,4i;c1.,.e,.,;1%,.!-,...144,.•:.•-' .,.!/-...,:.,',-..•.: •i-..9...;-- - ' .. ;•--'•,.4::'..••-.' ' •V. I,s .".•;"•,,,.,',.--,L,•• ••3i.,'I .t.;;• i-,L.'i.4.!.:4: ••••,, .'•• ..O.:-4.' )....;"11".•1:-'i,,,,:if.,14';:%)%,1•• ...':t•C:',)-•7 ., r -r' -:,.':-.".12' - r- - '".:.:' --'••'; -' .'- ' '• -. •:!•::-Ztt.j",-Y:■':;111'.14,!. ... '''-''..;.•:,!, :'''''■"...'-'....'i-' c•-.t7'., 1 ,1;-:+1‘. .:•••'')!-'1..'.-).' 1- . . •- .!.-...ri . .v..... i,.i.,:..,„.••4.:.e.,,,,...:-..:.:,; -p..-1..,..•_?-1-.,...-.•,...,...',:•.L.,• i,•,--i.. ‘4.."•:.•r-•.:cii...•(.74::....).r,,I-!...: ' .' • ' ,-s''' - 7 -. .'. ..., , '., •j,. ..._ ‘•. . •.` • .;,• V ,,ir.•.-1.';',4 i47,, ;,-,1)..;.±.A..'..::;:',!ZV,i. ...17t P' •.3,.:--':i":.:r i. -3•i''•'.. '.',.-i.'.."1:':)*W'"*:•4'.'',-'',1'.•.ti:'.".:7.-Z.•.0.;-i' .' . '..... • ' ':'' - .- -4 '.'; • - • ,• .-.• '...i':'1.:..• f'...f..;'-:...,%.; ..-;•.:..f.1..,-,•-3-/,■':,T•:1,;‘ :,..;''4,',..0...1"f:4;• Y.11 :1).'1..*.t:-. tr-'-'1.•:'-'1'.%•%::.,.:. -..•:.-• ' -- ''-'....1f-,-,•...''': 4 ''•. ' -''; ..,::::'!; •:.-.4-...'::;‘ , ..::11,1:-. `..4.41•1:•;.:;',i7.1.1-r•lr.::.?;-'"..■'`.1..■'•..a r?;'.;.' "*.i.:•?,1!--;-..;';..'7-.'`'f-`:•;1i ';'.'''':1.1'..-j;•:'''.'..;...i;";: ,: ... .2. .• . .',: . ..'.-.• ,...:j-Ili:. 2 ,‘;: •it,:•.'!.-.:..1:'. ••'..,:i'•)"1•*•^,r,"i t 4'?'' (.'"c•:..1.7..i'--''''''':''','.-;".i.j''''.:"1,•••"-...t '' '. . ' •:-.'. . ..- ''. ' '• ' • ' . .- % - . '*'.- •-•-:' ';' ,,•71,:.,,:..1,•:,:+!,•-;•,,,.''',1,.;"- tfo..•."!-;i....,.:.1•„•,•.;!,..:./:..:1-1317..,e..".... "4.4 ,' ..,.': ..•..' '' ':. •' . . ' ' ' •: .'.. . . 7.;.;'..3,,,I ;;;;;:',1•.;;i:',I;A:4. -,`:,', ...:--1-.,i•,- A:5f'; '••••;:;•.-.‘"t.,•.' ',.;-1;;.'i7"•',XI. ''*--..:..4...:.! 'e.1.'tf.'::i"''4'.‘T,‘,-.....i.::'i'''''" . , ' ''''; '••:':, ":':'' -. '• '.' 't ' • ,;:'';;" -;.••••••••:e.,".,;".4.."-I•j:''''..i.:::.•-s:',`i it;:•:".-::: -:l'i,'•1••**4;:,:.:---:,;_•1;':"•!::-2;:.--4 ,?-,-;! '.,..."..•!..5.:.-'.'•:-.'- -- -. . - •, ',. •..;.'••- .' .' - q--.:"•..t.--,--,,,•-•:,"...,..:;!::.;!;::1-.4-r.ryi.-•--;',.'! ...-:' '•-• A-:-•:1-1 7.•:4:•.',Y.!i'''...-'-i,Y:4---.(-,.,:....* .•••,•_..„,".•:-.,-,.,- - • • - - _ -' - • -_ ' -*-:-.--.,..11; ,, -•-..-.,. •.• :'.......,e."--1' ::••••...:.-_-_:...,.. •••,:- 4,,' 'CI-.:1-•:.-:!•“..."!•••-;/,',..,:%•.-,V, .. ,7-•.:,it . V.!,! , '", ,. • •,,!'........ :'!.. , •...•... • , • -. 7•--:...: 4.;••,...:'....,-,•,,„••.-7,.'.;:, 1-1,„,;17.,4,•;.-..„,,v(7,,,-1$•;.;,f,,::.e-,.;;,7 t•-•.',v„-,,.„-•;:•-•,,:,-,,. ; - ,,. .. , , •, , . ,.. - •L. ', .. . , , „ ..- ,,,,f '1, • . ..., , ' "7 ;-. .',7',.....,:,,, '• -.,','.•...‘." ''•'-'..!-'„,,%:,ri .tri-f...;.!•,1',..-1:3,....e,'!.,••'..".....;.‘••••.-. ••Li•-.. I• .'' • ' ..- • , _--„: . '. ,• ' '.....i-•-,•-...-.' ••''.. ' . •--1: .I i..,-;',0•,- ,•••:;2' .Af.•,', ...•••?.•,',1 . ....ilj;.1,1, 1114'.filiV4•!. .',1•4,?....1.4;(•-; f.' ..= .;•..-' '' .;•, , '• ,. :, , -,:.,-•• ••-. ' .,. . ,;!.L.• s''•......% ..'.. , '''': 1',4•:4";-"•'..R.•'.1.A.,..;;'...-: . ; . 4•,•/.? •?;:t.;r:Nt:Ve...t...-‘,1;.:4,,:,:-%:-,i;2;:-ri-,..;-:-..:;'.-:,..-.' ,.. ..':, '.• ,..-, ‘,.. .: -.-..,.,.:. ,- -- : .,.. --._ ,-:.--,,‘.,.--_' , . -.,'. .,;.,-,',. Cl".. , .:,:.,;*,,::::..1.1.7:-.■.;?,,,,..;'t..4,,--!..,t,i,,-,,,lifi,;?.,...,,Arfikt,,,y/:.,:t:41,',f1,..y1,,,,„0.?),.-:,..4k,,,,,,,1:1:4,:-.:.,.-.......- -.= -..-.:-.:;::::,:-..,;..,.- . , - ',-. . : ., -- ;., ,.',-... . :- ::, :;- .....',:s.-.:, ; ..--.,..-, ,, 1..•-d,:--;,,,.q,1-::..1,[:,,ii?$./:.,‘,;,-,:::,.:!),-0.,.:,,i-,....,;:s.i-ii-,....1..- ?_ .4,;-*,-.4,,,,,,..;-.;,,,,.11.1.-1.,..,,r.,-,......-..,.-1, . .,-; ..:-,.:. . — . , ..-, _,• - . . r .._ _ i....,..1.,--,p,,,.,,...rv.,....‘4,:,....-,.,.,;,.-4,..,-.;;;;;•;1,--,4-:-...-.,-;-:_-.,,,p,-..c,f..-;:irr-,A,-,t;:=';,,Z:14?,,•--)1.) :',. ' ':' ' -.. --- - ' .- • . . .• •. ' ' . . ' '' ' :' -'. ....."''' •--:-.N,k;:i--:•-•.a,-.7.%,!..ft .1,,•,t, :,i411;rv,I.,:„..,- ;•.1:;•--,-,..V7%-•::,-,:;•:••;. .c c '..4i.,,i!--;-.'_•-••.:`-•.' .. ..--- • '• -••-•: . . • • ,•',-' '• ' •.• -. r:-'.- -• ••- -•1 .-..!.:.;;.,;,:t..:.,...■..7,<•,,'!"-...16•;..,,.;`,,....i,...;'..v,,,:!,...,,••••;.....,..,t,...iii.!%1,;••. ,..,c.--;,•,..i.:-3.,_co,j.ri .,.,,..all.:,..1,r-,A..t.:.-4•.,; .,;---....-r--•,'......;,,,!-,...,..! :;:,r •:.':;',.,,-.-...._.- --. ...,..:- '.. '_ ,.• .:.,---".-_....L:..:..:. •..;-.- ..;.-.'.4';',:.:t..r•-•' ;•'_•--' •-'.";(!•-'1-1-; c.•':" ••';'!: ''.--'-`•:,.--.:le.t::-'f7,1-..`., .1 t,-..,.7%:,..,..-,,,..!,17.k,.-;,:.!,-.....-•,..,.---.:%-7,r,.. ,',.r-.- . •,-,•.. -,. ..; -.-.• '..•. •,- ,, - _••. -., . - . •:.....- :,--- -''--•,..:-._,,:;...-I . .;,‘,-,...,---,.,,4';`,L.',';•,••••...-%. n..,-.,' ...,..t.N.1 :k,,,,,. ., '.2.-!..-••;-,-;,.,::...i:_.....s.,;,,Ty.,,: ,:,,•••;:-... . •• :,..-..: . •,.,..!„..-„,.... ,. -,.•._', ;.T;. ,,,, ..::•:. • .-..:-:.-.,---...A.-;-;.1.:.,-..::.. ;-.-r i..:',:71 -1.;,i..,(-„, ,: ..:!:•-:7;......,I.r7t.-Jr....,1 r..-.,,--..,••,,'-- ..:. ...-..-...• ,,,....;.,.,;!,.,,r,:- ..-.-.--.•--. •,'' :,- - ..• :.••••_ -• •-•-. . .,. •--,.....---..•. --,, ',....„!, ';',,•,,,.:,!.i:`•,----:, ,;•-:','1..•,•1'.•7.4.ttz',. ,.:-. ,_? .,?e,g•tw, ,7.,..P.: :-,-,--i:-,,':•. .?:. .f.:'. ''..,.-,:,,••.., -:-. ...r.•.- • ',' .,,,:--, ; ,',-.: . .••• - .-...- ..- -.. :„ ? . . i''.'F'..f,'.:,,.;:7_,..,:,s';•-,-1.f..4..,7-•i,;.:'''. ',.!.4 : .•ifrfp.-: *.-:A.,:,-.4i.-.,:e111.4;',',V,,f,P.-14.,‘6Aa',.:.'::-.•. .','-- ':-". •.--,'..--..,.. ', 7•- - .-- -' . • --:• - -..•--‘,-''.-'' . •--.- .-'. -•--, ......;.,-•,,,,,.:_=,,:-; I _il::-,... . -. _.',-- •--,.•- •.••' .. -• : . •• _ ... . .-.--,...,,,•-,..,.. ...•',• ,. - , ,.. . , ,,.,,,..;,-!„.;.;:.,41;.4 ,,..,;,-...:....„.-,., ...- ,..-,- - . -• -. ..,,-.. - ... .,. •- .-..... ,-,.,•-.:.,,,•.,,....,--,,, • .. . .., ..,•. --,..) .......,...,..-.••,.‘. ...:-. ..,,.,7,-...t-...i..,,,,T,-;tez,.-.-,.i:•„.1,....j.t-,-,vi,A,t:i,,11:1-_ ..:;;.•,,,:.,:,......, •, - .,..- •.,,, •- ... • • .• • • • -, ,.-.._,..-.•• , •• - - . :.. . ,.°p ....,.,:.,.;,;.......-, ,,,i,-;,,,,,,-,,,,,, ,...(-....--„,...4„.....: .,.4„..,4,..n..,...-,,tt.._.:.A...f...,...„.sr..-f......,.;.h.;;;;•:;,--,.--‘,...,.. ,, ....; ••• •.: • -. . -, . . •-• . . - .• ; ' ' •._•• -. -. , „. ..,-„ -.:-, , ••••;,,,:t•,:;--.1;..-,--.,,...„:,1,,,--..,: --.- _• <•-.., --. ..... , ,._•• ,.. . , •.• . . :• . '. :• .. . .... . • •,:-,..c...‘••z,...-..,..-..T.-!-:-.,i c.;!:...,-,,-:,, .-;•A•,-..",....,-',.::..T'5 • . •..e,.,;•-•,....,.:',._;,...... , . .- 7 . ...- • -.. .- .. ' . " : •. • . . •.. :•.-:;•::: ;;;:.,:;:.-"*11.:,..-•"..-- ,--'-'"-".'''-—''' 1 • f:'-''''',',,''. ' '• ' . ' • " " - '. . - ....' •' - ' ' .• '- '. ' : . '• • .:.:-...•,._,•-......"--..z..--. .- -- ' ",'.e. 't ","v-s're.-V-,'".'•ts.•4:::,-,-.7-.:if--,1. •,.,,.,'',•,.' .-.. " ". ' -' '- 1',. " . •.' . • ' i'7.`. ."-;■".:.'''..."••••51:.";".'":"I' •-i'.•1.. ...,”:-! ,•••--04v.,',,ts...!--.••••••••••!, ,••••••••:‘ .• • ': . - . • , .•• -!.- . • . : .- .• - .. .. , .. . - ,..• -• . - •--••',•:.••••7---.,,-...-T.V.-t•..:.,.:•'..!..:':!.,;.:,,:- --. •••:,..,-,'.:i•-" ',4-!0;,34■••;13•'••‘;.•:;-;'0'l'!-=''‘';',7-.'•'•" . - ' •. ,I • :".- ''' ' •- ' .- - - ' .!!!-i'•":•1;:i•e!..1,_Lj:: fl.;',,-1- .-.i-i_--.,".......:',‘I zi.;..'•-:;:-:`, . ..-.-,..:;.-1';1•,. .,•.!.;.-x-,•-k:..,,••••....r!...-. ...:,.,-. -.• • ., - • .._.;. _ •. , .. - . . • .... ,- .,. - - , ', . • ,.....,..L.,!:-. --.',.,..pilL,,-,..-.,• ,,•••••...e.,/1„,,.•,::,.....-%.,%-,ct.•,-,-,e,:!.,.......,..i ....„!...,-;.±-07,!..!:-,,..:-...!:...,...•7...:...!:-.1.:-•:. - -; , • -. . -. - - - ..- •-• . _.. . .. .... . .., .• -!st'-'•:[:.!.---...-4,r-zf-.-...•N-T•_••,-41,'::•-•:•• ;;-1- e.4',...:,,);••..,,1-:-14.!,-.-.-..!.-',,,• : '.....,.1 . .. ,:... -.- , • •, • , , . . . ............. • .... _ i .. ,.,... ...;. c::::•1 •.7",:: --;:7,;',A":-.7x.-.4-7.::!r;Ii--et4'...--1.i.,•,-:itt.;---ft'e ';,•141.1-;,:k!::-::::-.`"-- ‘,1,::----. .'., - - -:- ! •*- ' '----.- .. • •-- ' , ': .• - :•,- .t..--;';' ----. '''•-' ' ''----.':- C4'..1::\ -!:•••--:Aiv.`....r2,....-1.-!...1.-,:,,,,......,v,.._,.....i.-...... ..,v4,,,...‘,:,...,....„,......,,.:1,,„;....,..,,,,,,...... .. , . . .,. ..... ...,,.. . ... . ... . . .....,.............. ... . ....,.. .,., :. .,, ; .. i:-....;-:•-''!:.-..I.--;4,,•;•/;:.`-. .1,..:.`•:,!ei•-•:,1s.:_t:-..-;!.',--::•,',":1,-,4--;4 '2''!11--'1;-!i•+-':4.2-.1":•.-.11.•-;'-':'..-'- .----':-. ' '' . -- -'" ' ' '.'.:-.-. .. --. - -' • -..: ' • ' - -. ; . ...- - ;•--'•--'- ,'-'',••',.!.'"?•'.--;.;.!...:2.-;.',...:-...--;:•..1;-,::.::;.;;;-1...,;-/;••=::::.:-.02-.:. -!:,•:•.-,•-.2..•,!f.:,-,- . • -.. . , ..,. , . .,.. •.•-' .. ... , ., ..-._• - • ..• •.. •• •• - ;.. • -.,-,.-.• . ...• ! ;,;_,.,.....'.....?..._•.•,:.!"• ,....,!,:.,.1,1,„..„;,,-_,-,.,..,;„:7,:z.4.::L-.......s.,•-_-:-.-_,`:',....74-:',Y-.•:•-;.-4i.,;•-:;•!: ••-.:1-,',,• •-• .•- : ;'•: • • ' • .' • -.--,' . . .-;- :.-:. .-'• - • •'-•. . - :'. - - ' . ". ..0.:..:,:•:•••!,.•,'......"!••:e..:',..?.'.V.-:4-./•;..1'.••••::•,-;"!;1•-,1%!.1.)::.,-;t:t;'4,;77••::,...,!F-,„7,•-;.!.;!.:,--.',.,".!.;,-;-,:„!, • *' . -,-,'•:•, • .':.. ,.. -1 • •-, _, .: . .. . :.. . _,' ; ....• ..-,..,-:...,„.-- - . ., ;•:••....--•-r...',:y.:,...:1.-:?••-••.-•::-.:."..?•:•'...::‘''••••i-;',:"A'•;•!,•.'37:4,'..--,..r...,:;...:-..---,,••,-.7..,-,:,-3:;:.-:.!,-......:•:,-.,•,::......,:„ . •. , . •: . . •; • ..-!:... , • •..*.:.... ..•-- . •• ' ,..- .••..-._ :,. -, -. -•:--•.;.;:;•-:.;z,r.?,...'•.-4.:-;',ri 4;.•,-0.-e,'•,',/;.:1-•-•.--'••t•?•=;:-.*:"...r:'.:::'''';''.1-'-';'71.7...;;r•-l?••••';'..`!".:':::'';''% -•' '" ;: -' • - -:,' ' ' . •'. : - -;-.•:•; -. . - •• .••• ''•• .. '. '• '' ' --;•:.f.t.:"-:■.-:.-!%% `-•' ,..'...",',..'•-.:-.'•4v,.....,: •-‘,z....t11.-:-4i...,‘,..),T,;•-..:-,..-;-,i•.,......-:;-;.••, .-• , . , ' -,'.‘.'• •• :,'....-•.-,'." ,',.• . " • • :. ' - • .. -,• . : ' •'• , ••, ,, -.• ;.....7%7,...•;.:*:',._;.‘...,-,-i:•;%:.,..r ,.-...•;•:•-....74,...:...-;,...:::.,-_.'•,4.-----,, ..,.,":-...:.- - : . -• --, : .'-•;'N-..'%•:..•-.-*,- ,;:- - . • -• : • •-: ,, • . ' ' • .- - '„- ;;,..,;:,;,.:,;-,.,....,-,s.:.,.: •,;` .;.;-:,:",:44.!i.•- •..:-T.':.:.,••i.1..:..:..4.z.::i•;.,,if4.-.;•)!k•,4:i.•■••;•.:•:,;‘`.:'.: •'- '• ''. :'-.-'2. ' • '• -.'".. L-- •-: . --..'-- . .-- •' - ' '- • ' '.. •'• '• :'''• • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P347 - FEB 20 2014 ENVIRONMENTAL 4 J- RECEIVED - PLANNING INFORMATION FORM (Part I - Initial Study) RANC HO (Please type or print clearly using Ink. Use the tab key to move from one line to the next line.) CUCAMONGA Planning Department (909)477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies,Ordinances,and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. Upon review of the completed Initial Study Part I and the development application, additional information such as, but not limited to,traffic,noise, biological,drainage, and geological reports may be required. The project application will not be deemed complete unless the identified special studies/reports are submitted for review and accepted as complete and adequate. The project application will not be scheduled for Committees' review unless all required reports are submitted and deemed complete for staff to prepare the Initial Study Part II as required by CEQA. In addition to the filing fee, the applicant will be responsible to pay or reimburse the City, its agents, officers, and/or consultants for all costs for the preparation, review, analysis, recommendations, mitigations, etc., of any special studies or reports. GENERAL INFORMATION: INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: SUBTT18912, DRC2013-00887, DRC2013-01083 Project Title: Ramona Name&Address of project owner(s): Jonathon Wilson 8933 Ironwood Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Name&Address of developer or project sponsor: Manning Homes/Water Mill Homes 20151 SW Birch St. Ste. 150 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Page i of 10 ATTACHMENT M E NT P A P348 Contact Person&address: Craig Kozma-Project Manager 20151 SW Birch St. Ste. 150 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Name&Address of person preparing this form(if different from above): Same as above Telephone Number (949)250-4200 PROJECT INFORMATION & DESCRIPTION: Information indicated by an asterisk(')is not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. "1) Provide a full scale(8-1/2 x 11)copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s)which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east, and west; views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site;and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location(describe): 7074 Ramona Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 6.82 Acres-Archibald Ave.to the West, Ramona Ave. to the East, Pacific Electric Bike Trail/SANBAG ROW to the south, existing residential to the North 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers(attach additional sheet if necessary): 1076-181-01 '5) Gross Site Area(ac/sq. ft.): 6.82 "6) Net Site Area(total site size minus area of public streets&proposed 5.13 dedications): 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary): The easterly 1/2 of the site will be re-zoned from"LM"to "M"and will require a Zoning Map Amendment. The entire site is currently designated "M" under the General Plan and therefore will not require a General Plan Amendment. See attached justification letter. Updated 4/11/2013 Page 2 of 10 P349 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the project: Zoning Map Amendment for easterly 1/2 of the site from "LM"to "M". LIT Design Review ofAdnew single family homes. Tree Removal Permit. Minor Exception for wall height. License agreement from SANBAG to perform work in the ROW 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site(including age and condition)and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition,cite all sources of information(i.e.,geological and/or hydrologic studies,biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies): The site gently slopes from North to South and West to East. The site has an agricultural history and has been highly disturbed from it's natural state (Hamilton Biological, 2014). Along the Northerly boundry of the site there is a fragmented Eucalyptus windrow which is in declining health, possibly due to the construction of a block wall in the root zone of the trees(Bonterra, 2014). Several trees that would have made up the windrow have fallen over or been removed at some point in the past(Bonterra, 2014). Across the remainder of the site are dead or declining fruit/citrus trees and coast live oak trees, which appear to been cut at the stump in the past and have since re-sprouted (Bonterra, 2014). There is a vacant single family home (7074 Ramona)on the site which appears on the"Local Inventory of Historic Resourses" list (Rancho Cucamonga, 2011). The property was assigned a California Historic Resources Code of 6Z: Found ineligible for NR(National Register), CR(California Register)or local desgnation through survey evaluation (Rancho Cucamonga, 2011 -Bonterra, 2014). See justification letter for more details. Updated 4/11/2013 Page 3 of 10 P350 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Cite all sources of information(books,published reports and oral history): A Cultural Resource Assessment was completed and no significant archaeological, historical, or paleontological resourses were discovered on the project site(Bonterra, 2014). Mitigation measures are recommended to preserve paleontological, historical, or archaeological resourses which may be discoved during grading. 11) Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site(aircraft,roadway noise,etc.)and how they will affect proposed uses: Archibald Ave. to the West. Pacific Electric Bike Trail to the South. Ramona Ave.to the East. An Noise Analysis study was completed and required elements will be incorporated into the project design. 12) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase,and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s)if necessary: 45 a1H2ot subdivision with lot sizes ranging from 4,012sf to 9,501sf. Average lot size is 4,854sf. etc je New, detached, single family homes. 3 Floorplan types, reverse floorplans, and 4 elevation styles per plan. House Square footages range from 2,526sf to 3,143sf. All homes have 2-car garages and full driveways (minimum 19'deep). Project Phasing is still preliminary, but it is anticipated that the project would be phased as follows: -Grade, street improvements, perimeter wall, other site work. -3 Model Homes and temporary parking lot/sales office - Phase I (9 homes), Phase II (9 homes), Phase III (10 homes), Phase IV(10 homes) See justification letter for more project details. 13) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use(residential,commercial,etc.),intensity of land use(one-family,apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.)and scale of development(height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): West-Archibald Ave. and existing multi-family residential and commercial South- Pacific Electric Bike Trail and existing multi-family residential and mobile home park East- Ramona Ave. and existing LM Residential North- Existing LM Residential (3,280sf minimum lots) See detailed site plan for setbacks and sizes of proposed houses Updated 4/11/2013 Page 4 of 10 P351 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale, or character of the surrounding general area of the project? The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding land uses. See justification letter further description. 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated,including source and amount. How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses? What methods of soundproofing are proposed? Short term noise will be generated by construction activities. All construction activity will take place during City of Rancho Cucamonga approved work hours. A permanent perimeter block wall is proposed and will be constructed early in the development stage. At build out, long term noise will be consistent with a single family residential neighborhood. '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: The existing trees will be removed as part of the development. Trees will be replaced per the requirements .. of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Municiple Code. See proposed landscape plan for tree replacement. See justification lettter. 17) Indicate any bodies of water(including domestic water supplies)into which the site drains: Stormwater gererated from the site will tie into the City stormdrain system. Water quality and storm drain runoff is addressed in a Water Quality Managment Plan (WQMP). 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at(909)987-2591. a. Residential(gal/day) 32430ga1/day Peak use(gal/Day) b. Commercial/Ind. (gal/day/ac) Peak use(gal/min/ac) 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. ❑ Septic Tank ❑ Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification,please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at(909) 987-2591. a. Residential(gal/day) 1242( b. Commercial/Industrial(gal/day/ac) Updated 4/11/2013 Page 5 of 10 P352 RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units) & Detached(indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: Minimum Lot Size=4,012 Maximum Lot Size = 9,501 Average Lot Size =4,854 For Sale Single Family Homes Attached(indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): 21) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents: Sale Price(s) $500,000 to $650,000 Rent(per month) $ to $ 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: Plan 1 =2,526sf,4 Bedroom, 3-1/2 Bath, 2-car garage Plan 2 =2,877sf,4 Bedroom, Loft/Opt. Bed 5, 3-1/2 Bath, 2-car garage w/storage Plan 3= 3,143sf, 4 Bedroom, Loft/Opt. Bed 5,4-1/2 Bath, 2-car garage 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: 4-5 persons per household 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B: a. Elementary: 1-2 b. Junior High: 1-2 c. Senior High 12 COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s)and major function(s)of commercial, industrial or institutional uses: N/A Updated 4/11/2013 Page 6 of 10 P353 26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type: N/A 27) Indicate hours of operation: N/A 28) Number of employees: Total:N/A Maximum Shift: N/A Time of Maximum Shift: N/A 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications,including wage and salary ranges,as well as an indication of the rate oI him for each classification(attach additional sheet if necessary): N/A 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City: *31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type, and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District,at(818) 572-6283): N/A ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water,sewer,fire,and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so,please indicate their response. CCWD will provide a will serve letter City of Rancho Cucamonga reviewed the project for fire and storm drain as part of the Pre-Application submittal Updated 4/11/2013 Page 7 of 10 P354 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include,but are not limited to PCB's;radioactive substances;pesticides and herbicides;fuels,oils,solvents,and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if known. No - None to our knowledge 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use,storage,or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes,provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. No 35) The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fee. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission/Planning Director hearing: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability,that the facts,statements,and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information r ay be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Date: `/ii Signature: _ _—• Title: Wo jeer tAckbutaer - Nhinel 4 s*es K.o M.O. J Updated 4/11/2013 Page 8 of 10 P355 ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED WATER USE AND SEWER FLOWS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT (Data Provided by Cucamonga Valley Water District February 2003) Water Usage Single-Family 705 gallons per EDU per day Multi-Family 256 gallons per EDU per day Neighborhood Commercial 1000 gal/day/unit (tenant) General Commercial 4082 gal/day/unit (tenant) Office Professional 973 gal/day/unit (tenant) Institutional/Government 6412 gal/day/unit (tenant) Industrial Park 1750 gal/day/unit (tenant) Large General Industrial 2020 gal/day/unit (tenant) Heavy Industrial (distribution) 1863 gal/day/unit (tenant) Sewer Flows Single-Family 270 gallons per EDU per day Multi-Family 190 gallons per EDU per day General Commercial 1900 gal/day/acre Office Professional 1900 gal/day/acre Institutional/Government Industrial Park 3000 gal/day/acre Large General Industrial 2020 gal/day/acre Heavy Industrial (distribution) 1863 gal/day/acre Source: Cucamonga Valley Water District Engineering & Water Resources Departments, Urban Water Management Plan 2000 Updated 4/11/2013 Page 9 of 10 P356 ATTACHMENT B Contact the school district for your area for amount and payment of school fees: Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Line Road, Suite F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-8942 Etiwanda 6061 East Avenue P.O. Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909)899-2451 High School Chaffey High School 211 West 5th Street Ontario, CA 91762 (909)988-8511 Updated 4/11/2013 Page 10 of 10 �,4•,i, ,1•.?,\•,1.) . :Y, ,1.ti:/1 ,•i? � :.ili" ^„iN. ... . t'!`rf•:;X..,,, •'•.r';'.:11 •`,,1=^'fT tie'` +`��•\`t� •s .�<�` 1,w5.1'.. ,�L f"Itjf _ • I Ik, 7 1 1 ( +.f`�1 `5 '} • f�'4. '+C• li, • w_try �• - '''>`..J° i F�,t yl +��! Yf 1:'�:"''`' I . t F•ai.'!,"\'' I+ .!-• t����.�� sl .1„.. -%?e Y�f�� : 5«•' �- H S'X /1-f � r •:'' ti+ �`. Niy3' f s'.j!'Ft21j�•17+A ,,s .kii .f �C. : -:f; d. Y -� 'y !t I i jT.t i' ., /l.,' �' ti ., Y! 41 _ '' ,+a`yr'1 . lw,f.��•� '), ��. �� ..��•Yl R'` i!1 ,rf eZ„�y,.°���,��4't`ti•i'� ,l ',7.�y.�/ ,i•: r 'r''`/1.. ,'�f:`�\'ir���•7 `• '•'at. �!. J!!' s ., 7 'v , .... ,i.".;• 11 ter :4 `^SA 4. `,'•1:e, :',.'''t,•`+ ':I' 'j,'.0k:1V . r 11. ?3'rTs?ILy' aya i ara:r y' . --II.`� • .� '4'''' , ''' < <� . ,,�`, F;v ;�..1.. _i” C`��'�y. A cF)j ,;� , ��';; `,.:/; +S r -8 : 'YET B E • t� I Sl I.< .21 ( ► I cAl; !';e,it4;1':',> '�1 K ` '. ..r'L. 1-+ s . .,•r , •r�r ta'q' yr S r 1 i i� , c „r f t, l� .tl�i' - ,�r7 ,' s!�• rrfpRaSly}�` ',4-z,::.\:2), 1 t .. r + «'-J. 'i71 1d ,-,2.,,~ rl r L*, wf ,i ;.�ti x\� �a ;�� /I' :"f�j,ill.+; `�sf.Y irrAl e N/, I N' S C` l� +,�.•J:r 1 11 1 ,, n_ t}.. r'i;n1 i�'� ? n •Lc•.'_''� 1 Sys I.-i,' _-.aL i w' .. '� •4 �-ac. r", .....-t -``�':••'0 14ti % ,� ��1. 5. •.�at :-;- ti5!j4` Y•' ,,}__-.- --- --- ws.,:r---•. 1 _ �".� A. ` _T'. � 11 -;...'.2..7.<,•,.,.:•xsl',.�/,. 7 •']OY:I•:`+<'><)>tt Ii4v.�.. _-�.�sr�l�1l ���J� � _•�_- -- �- -•- • •- •r ..7 •..• —_ .``.Y.ly•��,,.�r�v.sy.��..��s �•� �� �k.Y✓_y L/' v;, �I1/ --p-,1�_1 '',4.•• - •• w'�_' .•r� •a N_ - - .,r-z`�`,fsli' L',FY�'T/ . - - 1 • - II pi • ••,. OOOOOO . 1■•••• :::: 7-"...-.*-7... •.:• ''.4'4.,,I :: . , ..... ,01411! ....qh , ,Illikk p ly 1 .71.1W.1 ir7.,1-r/„.0..-4 •• A ® 00°51m 0--:I4 1--; 1'P 1 1 i ui 1=111g:ig4.-k-e.,&`--4S,-7-%4 s,”. '.--. ,•--..1•1..,1-.,_..1--.-.;--%'—ll.i.1'1T.-i-a)• o, ( l1.••••• •f•• 11 —•--1971 .no-. ----.1.::::.,_:•. 1.. I . _ c, offi. _ , . . _ ,..,_ _1 ______,, If •••••• I g- e F. Yom/ 1 ��' /` J�' ♦.... •-., :... /80p _ •■ A 0 iN - ,1 -- ,P — ' •p �' I I ,gad.-` ' 1 '�do . a. ml 1 Tanks r _ • Well k.— t W �f � _--_�5_ =s 4., i ' 4 --l. rte_ • _ • > .............~..= :� • • I u - jl tl PROJECT SITE ell . ` a GRANT • J — — , m - J;• I om. &_ .3.- -4111simail . i::',.':',..,-L:.:;!!!:.,.`.:1,',,;!,:if,‘,, ' MN' -- - ' TIPmr.h viir.. i,„„ r iiiir ,. ya ,..- tr. , i .; -.• ,_ I• aek Ra X301 - Y \ I .'1 _—. .1, ue i Fs 34-57 11 ! 1 iI{ 9}!31' ru' '17• r_9 r' �I - c —` , ;.. [w ; '' :,p •Clil •)• !J•a - T ,46 1A/ . 1 i,•1! !..!i. 444 2 120000 FEET 445 446 35' 447 R. 7 W. ublished by the Geological Survey SCAI n with California Department of * 1 .-- - MN 1000 0 1000 2000~ GN 1-Y •1•-• ..--1 i/NOAA I 5 "-metric methods from aerial photographs 1314° ble surveys 1933. Field checked 1953 °•19' zeuM{is CONTOUR II 6 Mats ographs taken 1966. Field checked 1966 NATIONAL GEODETIC )27 North American Datum )n California coordinate system,zone 5 ano..nren Me..n..4... ...:.1 •,........ ...-.. ....... ...- •--- ..._ _. L 7074 RAMONA *VENUE • MANNINGHWS LOT 9 & 10 TRACT 12532 10/8/2013 SITE PHOTOS 1 P359 i �- �i _ _ k( - :1.--_-,_r i.I i r _ s� ,.. __ 7r 4.1 10 . !d� v. i r I r ■ . SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES TO THE NORTH OF PROPERTY • ,\ P360 i, y '. ., I . • ,'fit 3 w; Ar..t . ; 4;.• ,�, _4 '- i i 0 S '"g ii 4 ' t ' t 'ar r sue( Ar •444 .I I., .f°. 1�'q' • -„fir,. 11,..-.... Y s. 6 t > .6't5 s, i a .t�4 �,• t j i r.-:.a li l .y`.- _.fit•, r. w P� �; a4*• .rl.i., � 4nab!'Jf'` A.i� •.... .K_../r-. .F' F r .'a A. 3 • a',t,�.t'x"�'' .,g '‘,....c,.,..... 4. be Z s y t ■ - c , ..,7.7 . •- .' '''.01''' ^ ^r,..:.'1.../ ..,,,....1 „ „ ' ;. Nt% . je, -,-el,..,,,.,':., sF. r .. Ali t ° ^ y x _ S - ~ a r —sac ''„= .1. ... • (;lIii I� iii c 1 t IP '\/ I 1 //l!/l/iI 's , S .. fill./ /11/1111! N • !1111'1;1'il I 11 li ' \ ,Hi/ !LOOKING NORTH UP ARCHIBALD ! ` iii iii `- . \ .! 54 — P361 1. .. , •:':e..-4-4?-', ...4. ..,, V •5555 -, • ' *71-44A4.Sk. 4 . t , 5 .A,v, .. . . 7".( • , e ... A 8 _S If' ? , .' ,,,, 0 1,,,,,x • ■ 1...1r <, ,f . ' ( ,,,,, , , . . . , ,,o - to i, t "., ',' ' ' C , , A- , ‘ ,,.., : - .„. ,.7. . .. ... , y,, t,„ • ■ '.'' '% ' '....tit .,- ,, 4: 111W'kit, w 4,,. ii k.*,'-`. 4- : 1--,,dilr- - '. "71 tit' .164,.„,?. 4% •. ..1. . ' '41'k . ; ... -c....,04.",- ' -'., • " ^. - ' , II .1. ... 4 , e' 4 ,.., I ft y. ,. .,. . #r: ' tAA"fl• • , •$' ili ■ eliirl% ' 'IV t.'•I' V . ''', 'Fli"IV,. >'• ,• ' .. 1 - l *. 41* 1 • Pil Y.ii` Ct I .',. ..i,--,7. , ,,,,, :*:., ' ....• .y;:1-1r°?. 4,-,:iiw- `-- `, it %;--:: , , ■:'...-4.-.' ,«- ., ' ' .7 ' - y A ,,, , 1 : -4. " .'t." ''.,". '•' ''t.,-.1% ,/ CL 1 ..,.., Qer-irl. 7 -' * ....4' • .'. ' ' 'Ale I it4 ''', . '° ,-- '''"?.44V:i, riKr, ' i";:',it., . --,*. . , ".. . ' •t-t- -7:. „ .., ■ / ,tit I CC A„v, ...; :,,,-- .., '. -.1-114...,, ,..,' ,' , ', cti. io. ,ft,, I • CL LL ., — .o. - ,... _.,,,.. zz.->:-:-..-.. ••'s ,..,. 1 ct 1 iii . .. i44(1, , ,,L, i r,,-.;..',. z cc J . .. - i 0. <'" ''''t Z,., 4 kt.itti::l's. li " 'jiff',••-■•• .. . ' Cl) LLI-...-4. ' ' '",„. .-*•*.C. '‘'... .,r.N."J t'-;',i.,- ttf, - ',-1', t'o-'. '1,4-2 4 r-';''' t'''t .. ' •.A.N-:,.. " *'' .''' ' . .''' , • .\•,'id' t-4ti*,::::' '',.‘ • -,, .' -:•A . , '1,- '''''P .. ".• '• - - ' 1 ...s. i 4 - .;A-■ 1 D ',,""3:4.?e,"*,.. 4.,- -N-N. ' ,:,- :' • . fr) ,, ,i5' Zr; .,,.•-t 1 P362 i It ir 4 0-,:e y ti -4,,� .:.' �i 4 b i,Ye° it �� s x .��r yAr '"?';'«4*.-j w"` 4,;, a w i c >>14*-K., ALAY 7^' a" ,. .' i�;2 s g, ,.• , {t. �4M .. ast t f` 4 1 . ." ..- Via. Sa .,: tA ,,,'� .r.. , `_ N fi^ r �• _ . n". "...7�.r' tea` `n.'.- fir"_ "" / 1 if i/ • / " .....-. , „,._ LOOKING EAST DOWN BIKE TRAIL P363 r r a. • . Arat • 1 • r 1 S • / Z ■ II • , - • .' 1° r r- • t - .� r ,,,at ) ,:: •.. - fi .,I Ir.:. slX Y ,for, + 4,r •ck ir s t f �_• �y,,,-,}.� %� 1v io tr.: �'. �' Y'r i4.: � ..iiw`< �r�ne ,r` ` • - _ a LOOKING EAST DOWN BIKE TRAIL " z''' • 0 0 • Ix" '1 5.., . Yom. -.... ...... y. _ ... LA /77/ .... 4 ..,r , „.. .• . . . .• . , •,1,..;:I '..''''' -,. .'-1'4... \ it*, .- jb t''.:4:404.,..1 . /1, • • . 2..."*"1 ..64, • ".,' . . • .. ..., '4,4. P. . ',. e 1 - - .. ,. r., ,, •,,..., • ,. 4.F- .,.. ..,,, -,•;-.4 • . , ....--iii -_ .; • 1 • 1 TY" LOOKING WEST DOWN BIKE TRAIL •'• 7- - ., ..' ' 6 .•.4 Or.-!"...r.'....7 -:::: ::-...'•:....:,..s.,..\\.„.'.. \''\ ••', •-r ....x.\ '14.41::•en44 40iit'• •• - ''....'4%,..‘•..‘.'.1.-s. :-.--'4.-1-• . ",.i. 4-•••7;0.-:,..:‘.-- •- -,'"i" ..;....'. , •, ..... ..' ' • ..‘ „ .,'''''" ,e.. . „/ -4t14080, s:i.,.,, , SW„,v'..,•-.t:-..-- • ,..2.,/ -,...',1^ '''...-;„.. 01- , •;'?.... -..,-,-,•. fs „I i.,...f' . .----, ..,?:-.„--7\>:‘, - -.iik'''• lit- ..----.,--.-:-.%,.,,,! ....' •?'''.•L'-' - '..,ci;41.,-,.=1, - *... _ : .....itk• • .'17-1 ‘....•.;:-..',•.:::,--.:.: ':-- .''''.: ' •41"; rn';'•--:',- .-,-•-• i -st'„, qi.11- -.•.-• .-__4:ii.V--..?., :--;.i;-:„,,,. fle-..,:" ‘,....- --,' ,,,..,-,,w,..-.,.. • 4 ,..::.....„...tz. ,...!..?,„:,,,...„.. ..„?_. .. ..:...........• , . .... . ..._.; - -,X.,....; .-'ft". 17). - ; ff --7 — , -, i.t; - . •- ,',•• .-1-..2:'','";,-:,;,-;.: ' ' ' - ''',:„,a..,' ' •.- ' , • . ,'' ;.-.,ir,,,, '',.*. ''' . . , .,, ...."' .'...;',.... ,-,-•,'...- ,......., ;v.',..1„.., ... , /:— -.1".; .. .1, '.. .;:..' .V'rir ."..'... . . :';''''''..,...'''''..,•''.,..'.7., • . t . ;'e,''•S'''..., 7 I 4 ir . , • k . ., /". .• •-•''4'• ••:'''.,-; •,,V.'.1`7..... 7 7- . .;;;:.•<-2 '..;.-. .:.::•: ''',.•• . .,. ... - --/ - ..„tt: -4..:-....*:'.;::'•. . • --. - - -,•. i-:---0-,i•Slo _ • ,-• • •- •• .:•, ‘ . ,,,P4•-•( '' . • •..-•• •0•6 13: .■ • •At. . -• , . .• r :' ,--.."....', ,.... 'Jr- 4— , ., ,,,.. .• . .. s.'„,,,,,,,441.---,,-;:i44:0-4,„„-_:. • .,...::. ......„... .....::.....*7'4.- • - - ..••.• „ .,..,„.....„,,N,i,..:.. . . ..,• . _ . .• .,. ,. . •• wir. ,. ; • . . 4.- . i ••:::,, •. . 1 - . ig .,,,..,,,, , , .., ,; _,. .. 0„._ .,..... .•:,... ,...p._.,.,47.-4:::,...i.:0,,...;....:..":„.,, . . _. - •• • - " - I , , ‘ . -4c.k, r•—'. - -, 0* -,-3: 4*.‘..,4 --,e,----. 4;,17.4.., .-v, -.7'- ..., . , . ,, „. ......f....,,,,,,,4- ,.-e•_„- .."...r ',.*:•Mt.,7,1 . l'''•',... :•■71% :• •4 •• ,(•,' -!• 4 .4., .4,.. ...„,,.;•p; , :• kli, .. .•:: , .. ..... ,...p.:......., ., ..,: .:..f.,... .. *„. ....,. • .. :,......7.„. •••• _74k, .e., ( • ..... . „:.....,,....:;...._,;.••• , —., ., • . _...' • :-,-.4 .. .1 .•. ,,,, ,, 4,...,40, , ,..2,,,.„.........._ .,4 .„2,..„44,.. ..: ...i, , ... .,... -,..... -...,0t ., ...„-,‘ .. .-,c,,i — - • , ,..........- ,. , , '• , '-: !II.. ---ii,n ' ''' -- :OA ...•-•-.....,4.-f.- it,;:.•. ,A, ,,,. ..' . *.• ..7.:, . ....,..: ,,,'..,,. y.., . . -. . " . . . ... i. -,..,. ...., .;ft .. , -44 * - •' ..,, . 1- 444?..',..# : •''..••,: -• .• 4,- —• 2... • - - _ , :,.....,,p4,....„, •.".,;,.-„,.:741:.:42fiar•A'' /.. ' gilt'.4. ,..„;:-,•. .,..:,,....::: •ii.:.• . ,•:. .,....c. - 4. '4 '. APtl•:, .,.... ','• - ,,-.-- -• . . ..,.. ' -• •-•" r,,1 4.,.„.' ", .. — . • . . ". -1 • !;-.Z...:.-;ci:11 'IA:-...-...1. ..,,,, . - - ' ,,,. - irt! • es. .,„..y..• 1..P: -1'.,-,-- . -,, '•:' -•Ii:i . - - • ...•-•e"!-. 44-- ..., • •. . ,:::::-...,„_.:„.,,,...7:•„.....„.„, . . • .,........,..,....„ •.„,..., ... _ -,.=-:..:.'-:•:-.,-„,--...,,,,,-.,.„.. ,..,---•:' --- •,,,,..,.. • .- ,....... •., .t. •,... i.z••• .,..........,•;:- . •,,,,•:•,,,„.:-._ - . .,..,:. ,,..s. .:.,.- . „. :,. • - . ...,... ... . ..:.•.......,,..„ - .... .... - --••--...,,...r.,;::--:::•,-:-:,......E.c..-_,... •.',-..:::•—=-‘:-.:fi.•;2":::: .. •. ... _ . — . . -• _- '.,,-.,,..- ...,, ,...• -..... ' — • .... --.H,,-,'' _-- ,-:'''.='• .: ''.. . :''''''''' ' ..... '`..' .......,!?:',::.-'.. ■ . ,,.. „ • ..."_. -. . .4.f■ . - .. ...:,'.. ,..: ..: ;.7..:: +.•.,-'',..i•tity.,;,,,:,,...,.... . ..„,.. . , - . , . ..., . . • .. . . ...-i,.., .. ..,. . • .. '` .7-: •,05 * • :::‘ ' 7 ' - ' -••, -. ,, - • !.,.t.-' ••.:46--••. ''•.-. ' ' • - , -,:. ;•-• . .• - - _-•, .. •..-:-ee'-• ''• . ,. -,•,'",44 ,4•;,,, • • ":-.. „:.:.. -:,,,,. LOOKING SOUTH DOWN RAMONA * Af, ''' - • • ■ A •. I' - ..--• •„ - irAtIA.. .&,,' ..f.4k.ii,'''''-' "'"$-',"' •,r--;;• ??I . • t . - • -'76 fit4t1 '. . .. • • . ' $ : . ',.. 0 •rs,, '"' • _ i. -,.. hi,i- - . ' '•/. .,.■• ., •:' '' r' ••-•. • ' '- • .• r.,1' : 4 '1,41.""7".;• .1..--"4 ,,, - • .-•. •-•.■ • 0 4, '-...'r+."-11h:-...-.,,,,,"AN•%•...!... " 0 .If •...„, 4 0. . , ',. '',,f• ' .'4'.• + , , r. ••••, • •,,- . 1.' -.47•:., 'i'•_`. ., '..- ,-—.. . •••' *-.... . .• . .,,,z' ,, 'i ••, - , ; ,..4 - •.•.• '2 1• 4 4 f ". •.1 ....17," • ,;.. 1 ••• '1*•• , - . t • , •i'' • ' 4•••••••••if 0 • ,r 7' '; ' • ■ i . ,-;;;‘,t•:., •_,.. .I. •-, isi• " • ' ' , ,..: •..."; 4 ‘4i'. ' A..,..1, • • - a jill/ fr VI, . & -.' • it 4.' .. •' ' ••, 41 4 • if, • • . • ' --..::••• - -1:;7•110 '` .: • .• .. •. I. • Z./ '9. .. .1111 ' *.' -• -.4 111,...,,P. .:' '. . : ,. ., . • • . l'A. , ••' v gli 1% • - • '' . . . ..i'• 4 ...,,.40..: , i . . . . .., • r .r. N -, , IR • - .. )-....V - - , '..") • — ..- ...,, , • _ . - •. :- a I -.- '.- - • , IT'.: i,..lt 4. -,:s 402.1% ,AIL.L., ' ..v...! , 4, 1•••44.'..' '' • ''''• V•'114 • ' ..nk • •;, •::.:`-5.,-i,k.- , ,-...., • •‘ . ."'..k. kt....t:. ,•* • - .L..,..•••• '•,t4-.. t - , . , .-T- ,15,v, • ' t...d: • , -..,-..., ,.. ...- ,til.4""-,,,.1 , - • .6.,' -4111,7'-• , ..,,,,-:. .. i 4,w.,,,.. . :. , - .-P. W ",, ` * T .7...,, 1P...r. 40. .,.: -. . - ..„.iv ,- -„,.- , r.,...•„ ' ..-, c , . •..4'*• 'tP v.... rt .. ' fr7 '. *:'j7f;• '04- '' `..:N,• • ' • - . ... t • ■ tw 115 -„.,• - ; :it •lit • . ., I •• . ••'.' .• -7 ..h.i . , 11 !• • 4 1. , .. I '•1 .. -. • "7: e'• 'V. . '• .. *t••..t:1 *-* I .,4.0 4.4.1. • - , • , wimossosikeeleOp' , . ..c.„ . 4. . ''. `• -1., "- _4.... - •4 , - . , i .0,7 . . ...• , , ell.** ' ,,... .. ,, .1r . i -.1 . .''''' ' °,'ill' . ' ..._, P ' , •4..-‘4,4,' ,•••••:0 ..., • L. -••.• -. • ,.. ir, :.•: 41 .1., . •- , . • s • ... - .4.A.,I. 1 . . .. • - , : ,:......, As ft Ar- - . . ..• • . _.,,.. • 1/4., - ' i.7' - , . ., , • - . ,_ . 1....:• 1 - Iv::-•,---,: 'Ar . 4 -i• 'e . - .,k—i.L7-- i.-----. 4. %.-‘ - - __.... . .. . , •.. - - 7 -- - --i • ..-•)- 4 "--• - . • s • """e,..;+ , :--i - K , - . - -.. - - N• ....t ••• _ .-. At r - • • . • ' ,.• r:•:.-- • . • . • _.> . _ .... , '1'..t • — ' -- ....• , ., 1...• %... . - -- 4; • - , : ....r ;• -, •k . • .r.,--•-.6• 4 '- •■• .. , Ir.,, . .." se _. • 4 + • -• ' **-- .„,„ .. • - , .. • •,. 4. , 7r.'' ., . . , , . . . ....., . : IL ..4..... .‘,' • . . - '.1 ..- • * *oft- --A',.."' ,•■ ....,,, • - : r • . 4>A4C7 . - * . • •./. i•4:... ,. . . . , . •, ,, ; ,. . . a 1 •4••' ...,....,--••• . . . . . ..,,,t . 7. " •.0.• " .r ' 'AI- ''',...44., . 11. . . . t. • , -V . . „ • ' ,..- . , • 4 4. ,I illif,„.•:. V . • .i_ 0' . „..t..s-1.•,icir-., -. • I 1: ' • -. • ,i••••t --• .1".. .-r • ' ..* 4, ...: "--..... • 4.- • *1151:5 'Iki.:40ki - - . • . . - «... ,--- • - •-• ' - . , - le' • -I . 'h...._ , ... . . • d?' 4 4 •- 'C :1;■ •\ 4 • - , , ----- — - ■ • Z- •4, 4../44.1., _ LOOKING SOUTH DOWN RAMONA . , ...,....- ..—..W6. . , , . .. -- • - - - ir , -: (..• . . -.-• 4, • .-, P367 City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II te. BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912, Development Review DRC2013-01083, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2013-00887, and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00626. 2. Related Files: Pre-Application Review DRC2013-00545 3. Description of Project: The proposed project is a subdivision of a property' of 7.16 acres (5.06 net acres) into 45 lots (Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912) and construction of 45 single- family residences (Development Review DRC2013-01083) in the Medium (M) and Low Medium (LM) Residential Districts located between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue at the north side of the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail; APN: 1076-181-01. The underlying General Plan land use designation is Medium Residential. Therefore, the project includes Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00887 to change the zoning of the east part of the project site from Low Medium (LM) Residential to Medium (M) Residential in order for the zoning of that part of the project to be consistent with the General Plan designation of Medium Residential. As development standards such as lot dimensions, setbacks, lot coverage, etc. for single-family residential development within the Medium Residential District are not addressed in the Development Code (only multi-family residential development is discussed), the project includes Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00626 to insert these standards. Also included is Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00889 for the removal of the trees on the property to allow the construction of the aforementioned houses and Minor Exception DRC2014-00161 to allow the construction of walls that will exceed, by 2 feet, the height limit that applies to walls in residential districts. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Manning Homes Jim Manning/Craig Kozma 20151 SW Birch Street Ste. 150 Newport Beach, CA 92660 5. General Plan Designation: Medium Residential 6. Zoning: Medium (M) Residential District and Low Medium (LM) Residential District 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The project site is located between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue, about 1,400 feet north of Base Line Road, and immediately north of the Inland Empire Pacific Electric Trail (PE Trail). The site is characterized by single-family residential development to the north and east, apartments and a mobile home park to the south, and commercial development to the west. The zoning of the properties to the north is Low Medium (LM) Residential while the zoning of the properties to the east is Low (L) Residential. The zoning designations of the properties to the south, on the other side of the PE Trail, are Medium High (MH) Residential District and Low Medium (LM) Residential District. The zoning of the property to the west is Medium High (MH) Residential District. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive P368 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 Page 2 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Mike Smith Associate Planner (909)477-2750 x4317 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): None GLOSSARY—The following abbreviations are used in this report: CALEEMOD —California Emissions Estimator Model CVWD—Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR— Environmental Impact Report FEIR—Final Environmental Impact Report FPEIR - Final Program Environmental Impact Report NPDES— National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx— Nitrogen Oxides ROG — Reactive Organic Gases PM10—Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB— Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD—South Coast Air Quality Management District SWPPP—Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than-Significant-Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ( )Aesthetics ( )Agricultural Resources (x)Air Quality (x)Biological Resources (x)Cultural Resources ( )Geology& Soils (x)Greenhouse Gas Emissions ( )Hazards&Waste Materials (x)Hydrology&Water Quality ( )Land Use&Planning ( )Mineral Resources (x)Noise ( )Population& Housing ( )Public Services ( ) Recreation ( )Transportation/Traffic ( )Utilities& Service Systems ( ) Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: ( ) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. (x) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been Rev 2-26-13 P369 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 Page 3 ( ) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pur. ant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earl EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are im•�r-=• upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Prepared By: '�'%' Date: u/ `5/i'/ tiff !!! (i Reviewed By: Date: 2-26-13 P37O Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 Page 4 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pntancanr with an PP 9 Significant coiporiae Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site. The project site is within the Archibald Avenue view corridor according to General Plan Figure LU-6. However, the proposed project is a subdivision comprised of 45 single-family residences that will have characteristics that will be similar to those of the surrounding residential development including architecture, plotting, and massing, and will comply with the City's technical standards that apply to setbacks and building height. Therefore, there will be no impact. b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Therefore, there will be no impact. c) The project site is located between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue about 1,400 feet north of Base Line Road (and immediately north of the Inland Empire Pacific Electric Trail). The site is characterized by single-family residential development to the north and east, apartments and a mobile home park to the south, and commercial development to the west. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this project. The house product associated with the proposed subdivision was reviewed by staff and the City's Design Review Committee. The architecture of the houses is consistent with the City's design and technical standards as described in the Development Code, and will be compatible with the architecture of the surrounding residential development. Also, City standards require the developer to both relocate the existing utility lines (such as those along Ramona Avenue) and install new utility lines and facilities underground in order to minimize the unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. Therefore, there will be no impact. d) The project would increase the number of streetlights and residential lighting used in the immediate vicinity. The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans which require review for consistency with City standards that require shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the project site. Therefore, the impact will be less-than-significant. Rev 2-26-13 P371 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 Page 5 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP 9 Significant corporate Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Williamson Act contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause re-zoning of, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓ ) forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220 (g), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104 (g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) land to non-forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? Comments: a) The project site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The project site is located between Archibald Avenue and • Ramona Avenue about 1,400 feet north of Base Line Road (and immediately north of the Inland Empire Pacific Electric Trail). The site is characterized by single-family residential development to the north and east, apartments and a mobile home'park to the south, and commercial development to the west. There are approximately 209 acres of Farmland of Local Importance, Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga according to the General Plan and the California Department of Conservation Farmland Map 2010. Concentrations of Important Farmland are sparsely located in the southern and eastern parts of the City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Furthermore, a large number of the designated farmland parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan FPEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Therefore, there will be no impact. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. Therefore, there will be no impact. c) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that is zoned as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related to the conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. Therefore, there will be no impact. Rev 2-26-13 P372 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 Page 6 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Incorporated Significant Impact Incorporatetl Impact Impact d) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related of the loss or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. Therefore, there will be no impact. e) The project site is located between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue about 1,400 feet north of Base Line Road (and immediately north of the Inland Empire Pacific Electric Trail). The site is characterized by single-family residential development to the north and east, apartments and a mobile home park to the south, and commercial development to the west. The nearest agricultural use is a Christmas tree farm located about 1,200 feet to the northeast of the project site. Furthermore, there are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land. Therefore, there is no potential for conversion of forest land to a non-forest use. Therefore, there will be no impact. 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute ( ) (1) ( ) ( ) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ( ) (1) ( ) ( ) concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) number of people? Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.3), the proposed project would not interfere with the region's ability to comply with Federal and State air quality standards for Criterion 1 Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations (local air quality impacts) or Criterion 2 Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP (consistency with the 2003 AQMP). The project involves the subdivision of a property of 7.16 acres (5.06 net acres) into forty-five (45) lots and the construction of forty-five (45) single-family residences. The Zoning Map Amendment that is part of this project will change the zoning designation of the east half of the property to match the zoning of the west half of the project site so that the project site is uniformly zoned Medium (M) Residential District. This amendment will correct the zoning so that it is consistent with the land use designation specified in the General Plan. The Development Code Amendment will provide development standards for single-family development in the Medium (M) Residential Districts. Therefore the project is consistent with the 2003 AQMP and is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Rev 2-26-13 P373 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 Page 7 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than and Supporting Information Sources: Signifiant Mitigation Significant No Impact incorporated Impact Impact b) Both the State of California and the federal government have established health-based ambient air quality standards (AAQS) for seven air pollutants. These pollutants include ozone (03), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PMio), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.5) microns in diameter and lead. Among these pollutants, ozone and particulate matter (PMio and PM2.5) are considered regional pollutants while the others have more localized effects. In addition, the State of California has set standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide (H2S), vinyl chloride and visibility reducing particles. These standards are designed to protect the health and welfare of the populace with a reasonable margin of safety. The City of Rancho Cucamonga area is within the South Coast Air Basin, which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The California Clean Air Act (CCAA) provides the SCAQMD with the authority to manage transportation activities at indirect sources. Indirect sources of pollution are generated when minor sources collectively emit a substantial amount of pollution. Examples of this include motor vehicles at an intersection, a mall and on highways. SCAQMD also regulates stationary sources of pollution within in jurisdictional area. Direct emissions from motor vehicles are regulated by the Air Resources Board (ARB). The combination of topography, low mixing height, abundant sunshine, and emissions from the second largest urban area in the United States gives the Basin the worst air pollution problem in the nation. The Basin experiences a persistent temperature inversion (increasing temperature with increasing altitude); this inversion (coupled with low wind speeds) limits the vertical dispersion of air contaminants, holding them relatively near the • ground. Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) of 1970, the EPA established national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for six major pollutants, termed criteria pollutants: ozone (03), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PMio), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.5) microns in diameter, carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and lead. Criteria pollutants are defined as those pollutants for which the Federal and State governments have established AAQS, or criteria, for outdoor concentrations in order to protect public health. Data collected at permanent monitoring stations are used by the EPA to classify regions as "attainment" or "non-attainment" depending on whether the regions met the requirements stated in the primary NAAQS. Nonattainment areas have additional restrictions as required by the EPA. The EPA has designated the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) responsible for ensuring the Basin's compliance with the FCAA. The South Coast Air Basin is in Non-Attainment Status for Ozone, PMio and PM2.5. Specific criteria for determining whether the potential air quality impacts of a project are significant are set forth in the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook. The criteria include daily emissions thresholds, compliance with State and national air quality standards, and consistency with the current AQMP. As prescribed by SCAQMD, an Air Quality Assessment was prepared by KPC EHS Consultants on December 2013 that utilizes the CalEEMod methodology and CEQA Air Quality Handbook, April 1993 to evaluate short-term construction emissions and short-term construction emissions for Rev 2-26-13 P374 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 Page 8 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact localized significant thresholds, long-term operational emissions, operational emissions for localized significant thresholds, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Short Term (Construction) Impacts Emissions'(Ibslday) VOC NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5 Demolition 2.56 23.84 16.83 0.018 1.62 1.24 Site Preparation 5.71 57.62 44.49 0.04 21.40 12.87 Site Grading 4.22 4t20 28.03 0.03 9.09 5.59 Building Construction 3.72 23.98 18.23 0.02 2.09 1.83 Architectural Coatings 2.59 32.86 2.13 0.007 0.254 0.229 Paving Emissions 47.74 31.51 22.31 0.04 3.15 2.53 Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Significant Impact No No No No No No ROG = reactive organic gases; NOx=oxides of nitrogen; CO=carbon monoxide; SOx=oxides of sulfur; PM10 and PM2.5= particulate matter Source: Air Quality Assessment-(Tables 5-2 through 5-7)(CaIEEMod Output) KPC EHS Consultants, December 2013 Equipment Exhausts and Related Construction Activities Construction activities produce combustion emissions from various sources such as site grading, utility engines, on-site heavy-duty construction vehicles, asphalt paving, and motor vehicles transporting the construction crew. Exhaust emissions from construction activities envisioned on site would vary daily as construction activity levels change. The use of construction equipment on site would result in localized exhaust emissions. Fugitive Dust Fugitive dust emissions are generally associated with land clearing and exposure of soils to the air and wind, and cut-and-fill grading operations. Dust generated during construction varies substantially on a project-by project basis, depending on the level of activity, the specific operation and weather conditions at the time of construction. Construction emissions can vary greatly depending on the level of activity, the specific operations taking place, the equipment being operated, local soils, weather conditions and other factors. The proposed project will be required to comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 to control fugitive dust. Architectural Coatings Architectural coatings contain VOCs that are similar to ROCs and are part of the Oa precursors. There will be 45 single-family residences constructed as part of this project. Based on the proposed project, it is estimated that the proposed buildings will result in about 2.59 lbs of VOC per day during the coating phase. The emissions would occur after grading activities, near the end of the construction period. Therefore, this VOC emission is the principal air emission and is less than the SCAQMD VOC threshold of 75 lbs/day. Rev 2-26-13 • P375 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 Page 9 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Emissions associated with architectural coatings could be reduced by using pre- coated/natural-colored building materials, using water-based or low-VOC coating, and using coating transfer or spray equipment with high transfer efficiency. For example, a high-volume, low-pressure (HVLP) spray method is a coating application system operated at air pressure between 0.1 and 10 pounds per square inch gauge (psig), with 65 percent transfer efficiency. Manual applications such as paintbrush, and roller trowel, spatula, dauber, rag, or sponge have 100 percent transfer efficiency. Per the Air Quality Assessment prepared by KPC EHS Consultants on December 2013, the architectural coatings estimates were based on coatings taking place over 20 active working days during construction...with the emission results displayed with no mitigation measures applied. Additional decreases in ROG (VOC) can be obtained using HVLP, and Low or No VOC coatings. The majority of the architectural coatings will be applied as interior paints which would offer the best reduction using Low VOC and No VOC paints. Using Low and No VOC coatings along with HVLP equipment it is estimated would likely reduce the VOC emissions below the calculated unmitigated values. Odors Heavy-duty equipment in the project area during construction would emit odors. However, the construction activity would cease to occur after individual construction is completed. No other sources of objectionable odors have been identified for the proposed project, and no mitigation measures are required. In compliance with SCAQMD Rule 402 the proposed single-family residences are not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors. Therefore, objectionable odors posing a health risk to potential on-site and existing off-site uses would not occur as a result of the proposed project. Naturally Occurring Asbestos The proposed project is located in San Bernardino County, and it is not among the counties that are found to have serpentine and ultramafic rock in their soils. In addition, there has been no serpentine or ultramafic rock found in the project area. Therefore, the potential risk for naturally occurring asbestors (NOA) during project construction is small and less-than-significant. 2010 General Plan FPEIR Air Quality Analysis and Mitigation Measures (short term) Short Term (Construction) Emissions - Continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a project- specific basis and in conformance with the General Plan FPEIR. Therefore, the following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: Rev 2-26-13 P376 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 Page 10 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PKo emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. Rev 2-26-13 P377 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 Page 11 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With han PP g rm urces: Significannt t Incorporated Significant Impact Incorpomtetl Impact Impact 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan (FPEIR), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Ozone (03), and Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM10) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance; therefore, they would all be cumulatively considerable if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. • Long Term (Operational) Impacts Lonq Term Project Operational Emissions Long-term air pollutant emission impacts are those associated with stationary sources and mobile sources involving any project-related changes. The proposed project would result in a net increase in the number of residential buildings/uses in the project area; therefore, the proposed project would result in net increases in both stationary and mobile source emissions. The stationary source emissions would come from additional natural gas consumption for on-site buildings and electricity for the lighting in the buildings and at the parking area. Based on trip generation factors applicable to the project, long-term operation emissions associated with the proposed project, calculated with CaIEEMod, shows that the increase of all criteria pollutants as a result of the proposed project would be less than the corresponding SCAQMD daily emission thresholds. Therefore, project- related long-term air quality impacts would not be significant. Mitigation measures would not be required. MaximumDa lyREmissions (Ibslday) VOC NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5 Area 1.9406 0.0456 3.8662 0.0002 0.0207 0.0207 Energy 0.0459 0.3922 6.1669 0.0025 0.0317 0.0317 Mobile 6.1697 6.5489 25.278 0.0539 3.4520 0.9821 Total 8.1561 6.9866 29.309 0.0566 3.5084 1.0345 Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Significant Impact No No No No No No Source: Air Quality Assessment-(Table 5-8)(CaIEEMod Output) KPC EHS Consultants, December 2013 2010 General Plan FPEIR Air Quality Analysis and Mitigation Measures (long term) Lone Term (Operational) Emissions- The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of Rev 2-26-13 P378 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 Page 12 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact • the City. In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan FPEIR; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: 1) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 2) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 3) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 4) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.3). c) The project involves the subdivision of a property of 7.16 acres (5.06 net acres) into forty- five (45) lots and the construction of forty-five (45) single-family residences. The Zoning Map Amendment that is part of this project will change the zoning designation of the east half of the property to match the zoning of the west half of the project site so that the project site is uniformly zoned Medium (M) Residential District. This amendment will correct the zoning so that it is consistent with the land use designation specified in the General Plan. The Development Code Amendment will provide development standards for single-family development in the Medium (M) Residential Districts. As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 4.3), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The project proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is located immediately adjacent to sensitive receptors — single-family residences. Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed under b) above and the following mitigation measure will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels. Rev 2-26-13 P379 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 Page 13 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 5) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. e) Construction Odors (Short-term) may include odors associated with equipment use including diesel exhaust or roofing, painting and paving. These odors are temporary and would dissipate rapidly. Operational Odors (Long-term) are typically associated with the type of use. Odors from residential uses would be like cooking and gardening. The proposed single-family residences are not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors. Therefore, there will be no impact. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native ( ) (1 ) ( ) 0 resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances ( ) (1) ( ) ( ) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? • Comments: a) The project site is located between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue about 1,400 feet north of Base Line Road (and immediately north of the Inland Empire Pacific Electric Trail). The site is characterized by single-family residential development to the north and east, apartments and a mobile home park to the south, and commercial development to Rev 2-26-13 P380 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 Page 14 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact the west. The project site is in an area that has been disturbed by the construction of residential development to the north and east, commercial development to the west, and infrastructure including streets and a rail line (which has been converted to a multi- purpose trail). According to the General Plan Figure RC-4, and Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources. Per the Biological Resources Evaluation and Analysis prepared by Hamilton Biological on February 14, 2014, based on the survey of the plant communities, the site consists of a fallow orchard, a windrow of Blue Gum Eucalyptus trees, old fruit trees, and about eighty- one (81) native oaks, four (4) native Southern California Black Walnut trees, and one (1) native Blue Elderberry trees. Based on the survey of the wildlife, twenty-four (24) native and non-native wildlife species were detected. Birds observed include local breeders, such as Cooper's and Red-tailed Hawks, Anna's and Allen's Hummingbirds, Nuttall's Woodpecker, etc., and species that breed elsewhere such as Ruby-crowned Kinglet and Yellow-rumped Warbler. Two (2) mammals were detected, the California Ground Squirrel and Botta Pocket Gopher - no amphibians or reptiles were observed. The biologist noted that additional common, widespread animal species may also occur/could be expected. Per the Biological Resources Evaluation and Analysis prepared by Hamilton Biological on February 14, 2014, none of the detected flora or fauna qualify as sensitive species and, therefore, the project will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals. However, all native bird species may be considered sensitive during the breeding season, as the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act and California Department of Fish and Game Code both prohibit interference with the nesting activities of native bird species. The following mitigation measure shall be implemented to address this impact: 1) If vegetation removal, soil disturbance, or any other construction related activity is to occur during the avian nesting season (February 1 through August 31), a preconstruction nesting survey shall be conducted prior to initiation of construction. If nests are discovered, they should be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist and consistent with CDFW protocols. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and left the nest, then construction in the area could resume. If initial ground disturbing activities or site clearing is proposed to occur outside of the nesting season (September 1 through January 31), then a pre-construction survey would not be required and construction could commence unimpeded. b) The project site is located between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue about 1,400 feet north of Base Line Road (and immediately north of the Inland Empire Pacific Electric Trail). The site is characterized by single-family residential development to the north and east, apartments and a mobile home park to the south, and commercial development to the west. The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities; no riparian habitat exists on-site. Therefore, there will be no impact. c) No wetland habitat is present on-site. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. Therefore, there will be no impact. Rev 2-26-13 P381 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 Page 15 Less Than Significant Less Potentially wit Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant corporate Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact d) The City is primarily located in an urban area that does not contain large, contiguous natural open space areas. Wildlife potentially may move through the north/south trending tributaries in the northern portion of the City and within the Sphere of Influence. The project site is located between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue about 1,400 feet north of Base Line Road (and immediately north of the Inland Empire Pacific Electric Trail). The site is characterized by single-family residential development to the north and east, apartments and a mobile home park to the south, and commercial development to the west. Therefore, there will be no impact. e) • There are numerous "heritage" trees within the project site according to the Tree Survey Report prepared by BonTerra Psomas on February 12, 2014. These trees are subject to the City's tree preservation requirements as described in Section 17.80.050 of the Development Code. Heritage trees are defined in the Development Code as trees that meet several criteria including the following: all eucalyptus windrows [and] any tree in excess of thirty feet (30) in height and having a single trunk diameter at breast height (DBH) of twenty inches (20) or more as measured four and a half feet (4.5) from ground level and warrant consideration for preservation or relocation. There are also numerous fruit-bearing trees within the project site that not subject to the City's tree preservation requirements. The applicant proposes to remove all of these trees (related file: Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00889) and, therefore, project implementation will result in the removal of these trees. The following mitigation measure shall reduce the impact to less- than-sign if icant. 1) The trees that are located within the interior of the project, but not including the trees within the Eucalyptus windrow along the north side of the project . site, shall be replaced with new trees, on a one-to-one basis, of a minimum 15-gallon size. These trees are in addition to the trees that are required by the Development Code for new residential development. 2) The trees that are located within the Eucalyptus windrow along the north side of the project site, shall be replaced with new trees, on a one-to-one basis, of a minimum 24-inch box size. These trees shall be planted within the rear yards of Lots 26 — 43 and side yards of Lots 44 and 45. These trees are in addition to the trees that are required by the Development Code for new residential development. f) Neither the City nor the SOI are within an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved State Habitat Conservation Plan area. The project site is not located within a local conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Figure RC-1. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur and, therefore, there will be no im pact. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? Rev 2-26-13 P382 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 Page 16 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP 9 Significant corporte Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: a) There is an abandoned house on the project site. According to a cultural resources assessment prepared by BonTerra.Psomas on January 31, 2014, the house, constructed ca. 1915, appears on the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Local Inventory of Historic Resources". The property was assigned a California Historic Resources Code 6Z which is used to describe historic properties with low integrity, properties that once contained historic buildings were found to be vacant lots, properties containing non-historic buildings. Therefore, there will be no impact. b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site. However, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6). The project involves the subdivision of a property of 7.16 acres (5.06 net acres) into forty-five (45) lots and the construction of forty-five (45) single-family residences. The Zoning Map Amendment that is part of this project will change the zoning designation of the east half of the property to match the zoning of the west half of the project site so that the project site is uniformly zoned Medium (M) Residential District. This amendment will correct the zoning so that it is consistent with the land use designation specified in the General Plan. The Development Code Amendment will provide development standards for single-family development in the Medium (M) Residential Districts. Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation, and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Cultural Resources based on the future build out of the City. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: 3) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, Rev 2-26-13 P383 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 Page 17 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact planning the site as a park or green space or paying a in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the research performed at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Sphere-of- Influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per the Public Safety Element of the General Plan; therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 4) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to . monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The project site is in an area that has been disturbed by the construction of residential development to the north and east, commercial development to the west, and infrastructure including streets and a rail line (which has been converted to a multi- purpose trail). The project site is an abandoned citrus orchard according a cultural resources assessment prepared by BonTerra Psomas on January 31, 2014. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest Rev 2-26-13 P384 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 Page 18 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant Imp act Incorporated Impact Impact the project site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. Therefore, there will be no impact. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Hi) Seismic-related ground failure, including ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) liquefaction? iv) Landslides? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ( ) (1) ( ) ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal • systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Figure PS-2, and Section 4.7 of the General Plan FPEIR. The Red Hill Fault, passes within about 1,900 southeast of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies about 2.75 miles north of the site. These faults are both capable of producing MV, 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7.5 earthquakes is about 16 miles northeast of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to Mw 8.2 earthquakes, is about 18 miles northeast of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code and Standard Conditions will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant. Rev 2-26-13 P385 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 Page 19 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than c PP g Significant Incorporated Significant Impact Incorporatetl Impact Impact b) The City of Rancho Cucamonga is within a designated Soil Erosion Control Area Exhibit 4.7-4 of the General Plan FPEIR. The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. • c) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.7) indicates that there is a potential for the hillside areas at the northern end of the City and in the SOI for slope failure, landslides, and/or erosion. Areas subject to slope instability contain slopes of 30 percent or greater. Landslides may be induced by seismic activity, rain, or construction. The project site is not within an area with slopes of 30 percent or greater. Furthermore, the site is not within an Earthquake hazard zone or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-2. Soil types on-site consist of Hanford Coarse Sandy Loam (HaC, 2 to 9 percent slopes) Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. Therefore, there will be no impact. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Hanford Coarse Sandy Loam (HaC, 2 to 9 percent slopes) Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. These soils are typically not expansive. Therefore, there will be no impact. e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. Therefore, there will be no impact. Rev 2-26-13 • P386 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 Page 20 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant With Than c PP 9 Significant corporae Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or ( ) (✓) ( ) 0 indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Comments: a) Regulations and Significance- The Federal government began studying the phenomenon of global warming as early as 1979 with the National Climate Protection Act (92 Stat. 601). In June of 2005, Governor Schwarzenegger established California's Green House Gas ("GHG") emissions reduction target in Executive Order (EO) S-3-O5. The EO created goals to reduce GHG emissions for the State of California to 2000 levels by 2010; GHG emissions reduced to 1990 levels by 2020; and GHG emissions reduced to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Additionally, on December 7, 2009 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) issued findings regarding GHGs under rule 202(a) of the Clean Air Act: (1) that GHGs endanger human health; and (2)that this will be the first steps to regulating GHGs through the Federal Clean Air Act. The USEPA defines six key GHGs (carbon dioxide [CO2], methane [CH4], nitrous oxide [N2O], hydrofluorocarbons [HFCs], perfluorocarbons [PFCs], and sulfur hexafluoride [SF6]. The combined emissions of these well-mixed greenhouse gases from new motor vehicles and engines contribute to GHG pollution. The western States, including Arizona, California, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, and Washington, already experience hotter, drier climates. California is a substantial contributor of GHGs and is expected to see an increase of three to four degrees Fahrenheit (°F) over the next century. Assembly Bill (AB) 32 requires that the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the lead agency for implementing AB 32, determine what the statewide GHG emission level was in 1990 and approve a statewide GHG emissions limit (427 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent) to be achieved by 2020 and prepare a Scoping Plan to outline the main strategies for meeting the 2020 deadline. Significant progress can be made toward the 2020 goal through existing technologies and improving the efficiency of energy use. Other solutions would include improving the State's infrastructure, and transitioning to cleaner and more efficient sources of energy. The ARB estimates that 38 percent of the State's GHG emissions in 2004 was from transportation sources followed by electricity generation (both in-State and out-of-State) at 28 percent and industrial at 20 percent. Residential and commercial activities account for 9 percent, agricultural uses at 6 percent, high global warming potential gases at 3 percent, and recycling and waste at 1 percent. It is not anticipated that any single development project would have a substantial effect on global climate change but that GHG emissions from the project would combine with emissions across California, the United States, and the world to cumulatively contribute to global climate change. Therefore, consistent with the ARB's Climate Change Scoping Plan, the proposed project was evaluated for consistency with the Early Action Measures Rev 2-26-13 P387 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 Page 21 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact (Scoping Plan is a recommendation until adopted through normal rulemaking). The proposed project is assessed by determining its consistency with the 37 Recommended Actions identified by ARB. In compliance with Senate Bill (SB) 97 and CEQA, the project has been analyzed based on a qualitative analysis (CEQA 15064.4). Additionally, the ARB was directed through SB 375 to develop regional GHG emission reduction targets to be achieved within the automobile and light truck sectors for 2020 and 2035. SCAQMD and ARB maintain ambient air quality monitoring stations in the Basin. The stations closest to the project site are the Upland Station and the Fontana-Arrow Highway Station. The Upland Station monitors all criteria pollutants except PM1o, PM2.5, and SO2 which are monitored at the Fontana-Arrow Highway station. The ambient air quality in the project area for CO, NO2, and SO2 are consistently below the relevant State and Federal standards (based on ARB and EPA from 2007, 2008, and 2009 readings). Ozone, PM1o, and PM2.5 levels all exceed State and Federal standards regularly. Project Related Sources of GHG's- Based on the Guidelines for the Implementation of California Environmental Quality Act, Appendix G, a project would normally be considered to have a significant effect on air quality if the project would violate any ambient air quality standards, contribute substantially to an existing air quality violation, expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, or conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community. However, neither the CEQA statutes, Office of Planning and Research (OPR) Guidelines, nor the draft proposed changes to the CEQA Guidelines prescribe thresholds of significance or a particular methodology for performing an impact analysis. Significance criteria are left to the judgment and discretion of the Lead Agency. Project related GHG's would include emissions from direct and indirect sources. Based on the Air Quality Assessment prepared by KPC EHS Consultants in December 2013, the project would result in the emissions of carbon dioxide [CO2], methane [CH4], and nitrous oxide [N2O], and would not result in the other GHG's. As seen in the table, the proposed project would result in a total of 11.3933 MTCO2eq/yr from construction activities and 0.7918 MTCO2eq/yr for area sources and 681.5140 MTCO2eq/yr for mobile sources. Total project related direct operation emission would result in 682.3058 MTCO2eq/yr. Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions - The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.5) indicates that GHG emissions result from construction activities associated with diesel- powered construction equipment and other combustion sources (i.e. generators, workers vehicles, material delivery, etc.). The GHG emitted by construction equipment is primarily carbon dioxide (CO2). The highest levels of construction related GHG's occur during site preparation including demolition, grading and excavation. Construction related GHG's are also emitted from off-site haul trucks and construction workers traveling to the job site. Exhaust emissions from construction activities would vary each day with the changes in construction activity on site. The combustion of fossil-based fuels creates GHG's such as CO2, Cho, and N2O. CH4 is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. Construction greenhouse gas emissions will be 341.799 metric tons (11.3933 MTCO2eq/yr when amortized over 30 years) according the Air Quality Assessment prepared by KPC EHS Consultants in December 2013. Although the emissions are less than the de facto SCAQMD threshold of 3,500 MT/year, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to further reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive Rev 2-26-13 P388 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 Page 22 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially ga Than PP 9 Sr igificant Mitigation Sip cant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. Long Term (Operational) GHG's Emissions - The primary source of GHG emissions generated by the proposed project would be from motor vehicles, combustion of natural gas for space and water heating, as well as off-site GHG emissions from generation of electricity consumed by the proposed land use development over a long term. CEQA requires the Lead Agency to review the project for "adequacy, completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure," to determine potential impacts of GHG's. Therefore the project has been analyzed based on methodologies and information available to the City at the time this document was prepared. Estimates are based on past performance and represent a scenario that is a worst case with the understanding that technology changes may reduce GHG emissions in the future. To date, there is no established quantified GHG emission threshold. Project Greenhouse Gas Emissions(Unmitigated), MT/yr CO2 Total CO2 N20 Total* Mobile Sources 0.00 680.91 0.0286 681.5140 Area 0.00 0.0775 0.0008 0.7918 Energy 0.0025 183.98 0.0062 184.8812 Solid Waste 0.00 10.985 0.6439 24.6200 Water/Wastewater 0.025 18.126 0.0985 20.9587 30-year Amortized Construction 11.3933 Total 924.159 Threshold 3,500 Significant Impact No 'MTCO2E Source: Air Quality Assessment-(Table )(CaIEEMod Output) KPC EHS Consultants, December 2013 The project involves the subdivision of a property of 7.16 acres into forty-five (45) lots and the construction of forty-five (45) single-family residences which will result in an increase Rev 2-26-13 P389 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 Page 23 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Sint Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact Impact in the net increases of both stationary and mobile source emissions. The majority of energy consumption typically occurs during project operation (more than 80 percent and less than 20 percent during construction activities). The proposed project will incorporate numerous design features that are consistent with the California Office of the Attorney General's recommended measures to reduce GHG emission including energy efficient materials in the construction of the houses, energy efficient appliances, water efficient landscaping; shade trees; access to a multi-purpose trail (Inland Empire Pacific Electric Trail), and sidewalks. The project is consistent with the California Environmental Protection Agency Climate Action Team proposed early action measures to mitigate climate change included in the CARB Scoping Plan mandated under AB 32. The proposed project will incorporate numerous design features including energy efficient materials in the construction of the houses, energy efficient appliances, water efficient landscaping; shade trees; access to a multi-purpose trail (Inland Empire Pacific Electric Trail), and sidewalks. Additionally, the City is participating in the development of a Sustainable Communities Strategy(SCS) with SANBAG for the San Bernardino County area pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 375. The project's long term operation emissions will contribute to area pollutants but will not exceed any of the SCAQMD's thresholds. The proposed project would have less than a significant long term impact with the following mitigation measures: 1) Prior to issuance of a building permit, the Project Applicant shall submit to the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) a plan for implementation of one or more of the mitigation measures/strategies to reduce GHG emissions from the CAPCOA "CEQA and Climate Change" White Paper. The total reduction of the implemented mitigation selected must result in a minimum of 5%. The selected mitigation measures/strategies and any measures for their long-term maintenance must be described and submitted as part of this report to the • City for their approval. 2) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC) materials. 3) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of; • Increased insulation, • Limit air leakage through the structure, • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances, • Landscape and develop the site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping, • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems, Rev 2-26-13 • P390 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 Page 24 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Incorporated Significant pa Impact Incorporated Impact Impact • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements, • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's)for outdoor lighting. 4) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following; • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design the houses to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non-vegetated surfaces. 5) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. The proposed project will result in 924.159 MTCO2eq/yr (total project emissions) of operational related emissions without reduction from project design features. Based on the reduction measures proposed for the project and the Mitigation Measures the project would reduce its GHG emissions below the "business as usual" scenario by 5%. AB 32 requires the reduction of GHG emissions to 1990 levels, which would require a minimum 28.5 percent reduction in "business as usual" GHG emissions for the entire State. b) The project involves the subdivision of a property of 7.16 acres into forty-five (45) lots and the construction of forty-five (45) single-family residences. No other applicable plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emission apply to the project. The 2010 General Plan Update included adopted policies and Standard Conditions that respond to the Attorney General and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). The General Plan policies and Standard Conditions guide infill and sustainable development reliant on pedestrian connections, re-use and rehabilitation of existing structures, link transportation opportunities, promote development that is sensitive to natural resources and incentivizes denser mixed use projects that maximizes diverse opportunities. The proposed project includes energy efficient materials in the construction of the houses, energy efficient appliances, water efficient landscaping; shade trees; access to a multi-purpose trail (Inland Empire Pacific Electric Trail), and sidewalks and therefore is consistent with the policies of the General Plan. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of GHG's and determined that GHG emissions would be cumulatively considerable, which would be a significant unavoidable adverse cumulative impact. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project would not hinder the State's GHG reduction goals established by Assembly (AB) 32 and therefore would be less than a significant impact. Rev 2-26-13 P391 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 Page 25 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: gnicail With is PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 8. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: a) Development within the City may utilize or generate hazardous materials or wastes. However, this is usually associated with industrial operations/uses and some commercial operations/uses, and not associated with individual households; home maintenance activities where paints, cleaning solvents, fertilizers, and motor oil are used; or construction activities that would use relatively small quantities of paints, solvents, acids, curing compounds, grease, and oils. The proposed project is a single-family residential subdivision. Due to the nature of the project, any utilization of hazardous materials and generation of hazardous waste is expected to be insignificant in volume and scale. Such materials would be stored and used at individual homes and would not be stockpiled. No routine transport of hazardous waste is anticipated. Therefore, there will be no impact. b) Refer to 8.a above. Rev 2-26-13 P392 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 Page 26 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact c) There is a school, Alta Loma Elementary School, at 7085 Amethyst Street located about 500 feet to the west of the project site. However, due to the nature of the project, hazardous emissions, and/or handling of hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste are not anticipated. Therefore, there will be no impact. d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. Recent site inspections did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. Therefore, there will be no impact. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan according to the General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1 and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located about 4.75 miles north of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. Therefore, there will be no impact. f) There are no private airstrips within the City. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. Therefore, there will be no impact. g) The City has a developed roadway network that provides emergency access and evacuation routes to existing development. New development will be located on a site that will have access to existing roadways. The City's Emergency Operation Plan, which is updated every three years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the event of a disaster. The project will have primary access to a public street (Ramona Avenue), secondary, emergency access (only) via another public street (Archibald Avenue), and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances. Therefore, there will be no impact. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from wind-driven fires in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone found in the northern part of the City. However, the proposed project site is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone according to General Plan Figure PS-1. Therefore, there will be no impact. 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge ( ) (1) ( ) ( ) requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere ( ) ( ) (1) ( ) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a.stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? Rev 2-26-13 P393 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 Page 27 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on-or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) that would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The project involves the subdivision of a property of 7.16 acres (5.06 net acres) into forty- five (45) lots and the construction of forty-five (45) single-family residences. The Zoning Map Amendment that is part of this project will change the zoning designation of the east half of the property to match the zoning of the west half of the project site so that the project site is uniformly zoned Medium (M) Residential District. This amendment will correct the zoning so that it is consistent with the land use designation specified in the General Plan. The Development Code Amendment will provide development standards for single-family development in the Medium (M) Residential Districts. The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit. The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB), through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: • Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent construction pollutants Rev 2-26-13 P394 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 Page 28 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than PP 9 Significant corporal Significant pa Impact Incorporated Impact Impact from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. • Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. • Perform inspections of all BMPs. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare an SWPPP. To comply with the NPDES, the project's construction contractor will be required to prepare an SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by Madole and Associates in December 2013, which identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures are required to control additional storm water effluent: Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. Rev 2-26-13 P395 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 Page 29 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Incorporated Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. • 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Madole and Associates in December 2013 to reduce pollutants during construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Post- Construction Operational: 1) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Madole and Associates in December 2013 to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD, approximately 35 percent of the City's water is currently provided from water supplies coming from the underlying Chino and Cucamonga Groundwater Basins. CVWD complies with its prescriptive water rights as managed by the Chino Basin Watermaster and will not deplete the local groundwater resource. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies. The project involves the subdivision of a property of 7.16 acres (5.06 net acres) into forty-five (45) lots and the construction of forty-five (45) single-family residences. The Zoning Map Amendment that is part of this project will change the zoning designation of the east half of the property to match the zoning of the west half of the project site so that the project site is uniformly zoned Medium (M) Residential District. This amendment will correct the zoning so that it is consistent with the land use designation specified in the General Plan. The Development Code Amendment will provide development standards for single-family development in the Medium (M) Residential Districts. The amendment will not allow more dwelling units than currently allowed in the density range applicable to that development district. The project will not interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Figure RC-3. Development of the site will require the grading and excavation, but would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 300 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs but will not be a significant impact. CVWD has plans to meet this increased need to the year 2030. Therefore, the impact will be less-than-significant. c) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on the site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official Rev 2-26-13 P396 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 Page 30 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With an PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. Therefore, the impact will be less- than-significant. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. Therefore, the impact will be less-than- significant. e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows or proposed storm drain facilities that the developer will be required to construct (in particular, along the Ramona Avenue street frontage) as a condition of approval. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. Therefore, there will be no impact. f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site is for new development; therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 2) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. Therefore, there will be no impact. Rev 2-26-13 P397 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 Page 31 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact h) Refer to 9.g above. i) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to adequately convey floodwaters from a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the , City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Figure PS-6. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. Therefore, there will be no impact. j) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. Therefore, there will be no impact. 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or • mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) or natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The project site is located between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue about 1,400 feet north of Base Line Road (and immediately north of the Inland Empire Pacific Electric Trail). The site is characterized by residential development to the north, south, and east, and commercial development to the west. This project will be of similar design and size to surrounding residential development to the north and compatible with the residential development to the east. The project will become a part of the larger community. Therefore, there will be no impact. b) The project site land use designation is Medium Residential. The proposed project does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection, SCAG's Compass Blueprint, or SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan. The project is consistent with the General Plan designation of the project site (Medium Residential) but is only partly consistent with the Zoning designation of the project site - Medium (M) Residential District on the west half and Low Medium (LM) Residential District on the east half. The Zoning Map Amendment that is part of this project will change the zoning designation of the east half of the property to match the zoning of the west half of the project site. This amendment will correct the zoning so that it is consistent with the land use designation specified in the General Plan. The density of the proposed project, was analyzed as part of the build out in the General Plan FPEIR. The Development Code Amendment will provide development Rev 2-26-13 P398 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 Page 32 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Incorporated Significant Impact Incorporatetl Impact Impact standards for single-family development in the Medium (M) Residential Districts. The amendment will not affect the density range (4 — 8 dwelling units/acre) applicable to that development district. Both the Zoning Map Amendment and the Development Code Amendment will be consistent with the 2013 Housing Element Update to the 2010 General Plan. The project will comply with the applicable land use plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. Therefore, there will be no impact. c) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to General Plan Figure RC-4 and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. The Zoning Map Amendment that is part of this project will change the zoning designation of the east half of the property to match the zoning of the west half of the project site so that the project site is uniformly zoned Medium (M) Residential District. This amendment will correct the zoning so that it is consistent with the land use designation specified in the General Plan. The Development Code Amendment will provide development standards for single-family development in the Medium (M) Residential Districts. Therefore, there will be no impact. 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1. Therefore, there will be no impact. b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site. Therefore, there will be no impact. 12. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Rev 2-26-13 P399 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 Page 33 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ( ) (/) O ( ) ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? - e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 • miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? - f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comments: a) The project site is located between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue about 1,400 feet north of Base Line Road (and immediately north of the Inland Empire Pacific Electric Trail). The site is characterized by single-family residential development to the north and east, apartments and a mobile home park to the south, and commercial development to the west. Noise levels can exceed established standards for exterior and interior noise. The primary source of elevated noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. The project site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Figure PS-9 at build-out— specifically, Lots 24 - 27 at the west side of the subdivision are within the noise contour of Archibald Avenue. Per the Noise Analysis prepared by Mestre Greve Associates on June 4, 2014, in order to reduce the exterior noise levels at Lots 24 — 27 to less-than-significant, the recommended mitigation measure is a block wall of three (3) feet in height along the perimeter of the project adjacent to Archibald Avenue and the trail. However, a block wall of six (6) feet in height is already proposed along the above- noted perimeter (principally for screening purposes) and, therefore, the recommended a- foot high wall would be redundant. Per the same noise analysis, a noise reduction of less than 20dB is necessary between the exterior and the interior of the structures to reduce the interior noise levels of the houses on Lots 24 — 27 to less-than-significant. No mitigation measures such as building upgrades to windows and/or walls are necessary as the construction practices common in California achieve noise reductions of at least 20dB. b) The proposed project is a single-family residential subdivision. The normal operating uses associated with this type of project normally do not induce ground borne vibrations. As there will be grading and construction, there will be a temporary increase in ground-borne vibration and noise. The mitigation measures listed below in 12.d will mitigate these short-term impacts to a level of less-than-significant. c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. The project will not significantly increase traffic as analyzed in Section 16 Transportation/Traffic and, as a result, an increase ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project is unlikely. d) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.12) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Rev 2-26-13 P400 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 Page 34 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP 9 $iImp c Impact corporae Significant Impact Incorporatetl Impact Impact Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. • 2) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 3) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 4) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment but do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measures shall then be required: 5) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located about 4.75 miles north of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. Therefore, there will be no impact. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2,5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. Therefore, there will be no impact. 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Rev 2-26-13 P401 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 Page 35 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) The project site is located between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue about 1,400 feet north of Base Line Road (and immediately north of the Inland Empire Pacific Electric Trail). The site is characterized by single-family residential development to the north and east, apartments and a mobile home park to the south, and commercial development to the west. The project involves the subdivision of a property of 7.16 acres (5.06 net acres) • into forty-five (45) lots and the construction of forty-five (45) single-family residences. This will result in an increase in population. However, this increase will not be substantial. Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. The project is consistent with the General Plan designation of the project site (Medium Residential) but is only partly consistent with the Zoning designation of the project site - Medium (M) Residential District on the west half and Low Medium (LM) Residential District on the east half. The Zoning Map Amendment that is part of this project will change the zoning designation of the east half of the property to match the zoning of the west half of the project site. The density range for development in the Medium (M) Residential District is 8 — 14 dwelling units/acre and in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District is 4 — 8 dwelling units/acre. This amendment will correct the zoning so that it is consistent with the land use designation specified in the General Plan. The density of the proposed project, will be 8.8 dwelling units/acre (based on 45 units/5.06 net acres) and will be within the density range that was analyzed as part of the build out in the General Plan FPEIR. The Development Code Amendment will provide development standards for single-family development in the Medium (M) Residential Districts. The amendment will not affect the density range (4 — 8 dwelling units/acre) applicable to that development district. Both the Zoning Map Amendment and the Development Code Amendment will be consistent with the 2013 Housing Element Update to the 2010 General Plan. Therefore, the impact will be less-than-significant. b) The project site is mostly vacant and is developed with one (1) single-family residence that was constructed ca. 1915. As the property is mostly vacant and the single-family residence is abandoned, according to a cultural resources assessment prepared by BonTerra Psomas on January 31, 2014, there will be no displacement of housing or people. Therefore, there will be no impact. c) Refer to 13.b above. 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) c) Schools? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Rev 2-26-13 P402 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 Page 36 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP g Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact d) Parks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) e) Other public facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) Comments: a) The project site is located between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue about 1,400 feet north of Base Line Road (and immediately north of the Inland Empire Pacific Electric Trail) and would be served by Fire Station #1 at 6627 Amethyst Avenue located about 0.58-mile to the northwest of the project site. The project involves the subdivision of a property of 7.16 acres (5.06 net acres) into forty-five (45) lots and the construction of forty- five (45) single-family residences. The Zoning Map Amendment that is part of this project will change the zoning designation of the east half of the property to match the zoning of the west half of the project site so that the project site is uniformly zoned Medium (M) Residential District. This amendment will correct the zoning so that it is consistent with the land use designation specified in the General Plan. The Development Code Amendment will provide development standards for single-family development in the Medium (M) Residential Districts. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project to lessen the future demand and impacts to fire services. Therefore, there will be no impact. b) The increase in residential units may lead to an increase in calls for service. Although there may be an increase in calls, additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. Therefore, there will be no impact. c) The Alta Loma School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve the project area. Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the school impact fees. Therefore, there will be no impact. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park, Hermosa Park at 6787 Hermosa Avenue, is located about 0.35-mile from the project site. The project involves the subdivision of a property of 7.16 acres (5.06 net acres) into forty-five (45) lots and the construction of forty-five (45) single-family residences. The Zoning Map Amendment that is part of this project will change the zoning designation of the east half of the property to match the zoning of the west half of the project site so that the project site is uniformly zoned Medium (M) Residential District. This amendment will correct the zoning so that it is consistent with the land use designation specified in the General Plan. The Development Code Amendment will provide development standards for single-family development in the Medium (M) Residential Districts. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. Therefore, there will be no impact. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project involves the subdivision of a property of 7.16 acres (5.06 net acres) into forty-five (45) lots and the construction of Rev 2-26-13 P403 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 Page 37 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact forty-five (45) single-family residences. The Zoning Map Amendment that is part of this project will change the zoning designation of the east half of the property to match the zoning of the west half of the project site so that the project site is uniformly zoned Medium (M) Residential District. This amendment will correct the zoning so that it is consistent with the land use designation specified in the General Plan. The Development Code Amendment will provide development standards for single-family development in the Medium (M) Residential Districts. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.14), there will be a projected increase in library space demand but with the implementation of standard conditions the increase in Library Services would be mitigated to less-than-significant impact. Additionally, the Paul A. Biane Library has an additional 14,000 square foot shell of vacant library space that is planned for future Library use. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Therefore, there will be no im pact. 15. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would • occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park, Hermosa Park at 6787 Hermosa Avenue, is located about 0.35-mile from the project site. The project involves the subdivision of a property of 7.16 acres (5.06 net acres) into forty-five (45) lots and the construction of forty-five (45) single-family residences. The Zoning Map Amendment that is part of this project will change the zoning designation of the east half of the property to match the zoning of the west half of the project site so that the project site is uniformly zoned Medium (M) Residential District. This amendment will correct the zoning so that it is consistent with the land use designation specified in the General Plan. The Development Code Amendment will provide development standards for single-family development in the Medium (M) Residential Districts. The amendment will not allow more dwelling units than currently allowed in the density range applicable to that development district. This project is not proposing substantial amounts of new housing or a large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. Therefore, there will be no impact. b) Refer to 15.a above. Rev 2-26-13 P404 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 Page 38 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wnh an pP 9 Significant Incorporated Significant pa Impact Inmrparated Impact Impact 16. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) program, including, but not limited to a level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that result in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. Comments: a) Implementation of the proposed project will generate 431 vehicle trips daily. The proposed project includes the development of 45 single-family residences. The Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) estimates that each single-family residence will generate 9.57 trips daily. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.16), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. The Zoning Map Amendment that is part of this project will change the zoning designation of the east half of the property to match the zoning of the west half of the project site so that the project site is uniformly zoned Medium (M) Residential District. This amendment will correct the zoning so that it is consistent with the land use designation specified in the General Plan. The density of the proposed project, will be 8.8 dwelling units/acre (based on 45 units/5.06 net acres) and will be within the density range that was analyzed as part of the build out in the General Plan FPEIR. The Development Code Amendment will provide development standards for single-family development in the Medium (M) Residential Districts. The amendment will not affect the density range (4 — 8 dwelling units/acre) applicable to that development district which could, as a result, affect previous analyses for traffic generation and/or trip distribution in the General Plan FPEIR. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in project design. The project will not create a Rev 2-26-13 P405 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 Page 39 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With an PP 9 Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. As a condition of approval, the developer will be required to construct street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along Ramona Avenue, and any missing improvements along Archibald Avenue and within the trail. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. Therefore, there will be no impact. b) The Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) estimates that each single-family residence will generate 0.75 AM peak hour daily (total AM peak hour trips generated will be 34 trips) and 1.01 PM peak hour trips hour (total PM peak hour trips generated will be 46 trips) daily. In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. The project site is located between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue about 1,400 feet north of Base Line Road (and immediately north of the Inland Empire Pacific Electric Trail). The site is characterized by single-family residential development to the north and east, apartments and a mobile home park to the south, and commercial development to the west. The Zoning Map Amendment that is part of this project will change the zoning designation of the east half of the property to match the zoning of the west half of the project site so that the project site is uniformly zoned Medium (M) Residential District. This amendment will correct the zoning so that it is consistent with the land use designation specified in the General Plan. The density of the proposed project, will be 8.8 dwelling units/acre (based on 45 units/5.06 net acres) and will be within the density range that was analyzed as part of the build out in the General Plan FPEIR. The Development Code Amendment will provide development standards for single-family development in the Medium (M) Residential Districts. The amendment will not affect the density range (4 — 8 dwelling units/acre) applicable to that development district which could, as a result, affect previous analyses for traffic generation and/or trip distribution in the General Plan FPEIR. The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. As a condition of approval, the developer will be required to construct street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along Ramona Avenue, and any missing improvements along Archibald Avenue and within the trail. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Therefore, there will be no impact. c) The project site is located about 4.75 miles north of the Ontario Airport, offset north of the flight path, and will not change air traffic patterns. Therefore, there will be no impact. d) The project site is located between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue about 1,400 feet north of Base Line Road (and immediately north of the Inland Empire Pacific Electric Trail). The site is characterized by single-family residential development to the north and east, apartments and a mobile home park to the south, and commercial development to the west. As a condition of approval, the developer will be required to construct street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along Ramona Avenue, and any missing improvements along Archibald Avenue and within the trail. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, Rev 2-26-13 P406 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 Page 40 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Impact therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. Therefore, there will be no impact. e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles during construction and upon completion of the project and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access. No impacts are anticipated. f) The design of the project includes, or the project will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e.g., bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc.). Planners; add project specific details here. 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? • g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) The project involves the subdivision of a property of 7.16 acres (5.06 net acres) into forty- five (45) lots and the construction of forty-five (45) single-family residences. The Zoning • Map Amendment that is part of this project will change the zoning designation of the east half of the property to match the zoning of the west half of the project site so that the project site is uniformly zoned Medium (M) Residential District. This amendment will correct the zoning so that it is consistent with the land use designation specified in the General Plan. The Development Code Amendment will provide development standards for single-family development in the Medium (M) Residential Districts. The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-1 and RP-4 treatment plants. The RP-1 capacity is sufficient to meet, and exceed, the wastewater requirements of added development within Rev 2-26-13 P407 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 Page 41 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant With Than PP 9 Significant corporate Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact t Impact the western and southern areas of the City. The RP-4 treatment plant has a potential ultimate capacity of 28 million gallons per day (mgd) which is considered more than adequate to treat all increases in wastewater generation at build-out of the City. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. Therefore, there will be no impact. b) Refer to 17.a above. c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, there will be no impact. d) The proposed project will be served by the CVWD water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. Therefore, there will be no impact. e) The proposed project will be served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. Therefore, there will be no impact. f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes • the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. Therefore, there will be no impact. g) This proposed project will comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, there will be no impact. 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively • considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects that will ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Rev 2-26-13 • • P408 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 Page 42 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with man PP 9 Significant MNporate Significant pa Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Comments: a) The project site is located between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue about 1,400 feet north of Base Line Road (and immediately north of the Inland Empire Pacific Electric Trail). The site is characterized by single-family residential development to the north and east, apartments and a mobile home park to the south, and commercial development to the west. The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Figure RC-4. Per the Biological Resources Evaluation and Analysis prepared by Hamilton Biological on February 14, 2014, based on the survey of the plant communities, the site consists of a fallow orchard and a variety of trees. Based on the survey of the wildlife, native and non-native wildlife species were detected. None of the detected flora or fauna qualify as sensitive species and, therefore, the project will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals. However, all native bird species may be considered sensitive during the breeding season, as the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act and California Department of Fish and Game Code both prohibit interference with the nesting activities of native bird species. There are also numerous "heritage" trees within the project site according to the Tree Survey Report prepared by BonTerra Psomas on February 12, 2014. These trees are subject to the City's tree preservation requirements. Project implementation will result in the removal of these trees. The mitigation measures listed in the Biological section of this Initial Study will reduce the impacts to the nesting activities of native bird species and trees to less-than-significant. b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2010 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects.to Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forest Resources, Air Quality, Climate Change and Mineral Resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels. Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels. Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier PEIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately Rev 2-26-13 P409 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 Page 43 analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive: (T) General Plan FPEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified May 19, 2010) (T) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (T) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (T) Air Quality Assessment, KPC EHS Consultants (December 13, 2013) (T) Biological Resources Evaluation &Analysis, Hamilton Biological (February 14, 2014) (T) Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment, BonTerra Psomas (January 31, 2014) (T) Noise Analysis, Mestre Greve Associates (June 4, 2014) (T) Tree Survey Report, BonTerra Psomas (February 12, 2014) (T) Water Quality Management Plan, Madole and Associates (December 2013) Rev 2-26-13 P410 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912'and Development ReviewDRC2013-01083 Page 44 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am thei applicant far the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that 1 have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further; I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a:pointwhere clearly n significa environmental effects would occurtA2oj Applicant's Signature: Date: 7/3 f Iq Print Name and Title: C ro a Co ewo. +- Pro sect thimmMer Rev 2-26-13 P411 �� City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING 4e. S..,r-: PROGRAM Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 This Mitigation Monitoring Program(MMP)has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. . Program Management- The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation)that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action,what action will be taken and when,and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 P412 Mitigation Monitoring Program Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912 and Development Review DRC2013-01083 Page 2 • 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed,as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee)with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. d P413 U ` C O A c E O 0 = U U , m c c cu ca o v v v E co Z N N N N N 0 I w rn 'Cr m C r F. 'C O 'O c C N a) F Co a) (0 �-. m > 0 - C c C 1- V w p • _ O «, 1 ) V to Q a m t .9 ›- 2 U a 0 > a a a 0 D co O V) V) CO CO m J C C C C C m co m m CO 4 M w O n a a a O 0 o O O O O O N N N N Z U C w N> > > > > G E ` a a> a> a> a> 0 F > a ce a a s Co CO J > C c w a) 'C C U 0 "2 . E LLI E c m I E E u. U 0 0 w 0 d U ° m °) O > d o o Z o a rat V c c c O c c o 0 0 m co 0.2 m N d a) 1 ❑ p 0 0 0 Z rn CD Ce ° a a a m m 0 m F . ... 4 N L _ U Q "N c' a) N L- T O > CO U CO C n U 0 C p N m « C 3 .n S � w � mu E . E � mO 2 � _ m 3 � 3 n • --Z O O) A N )o C 2 d a g O o w u0 o t a x O E >` p 0 0 7 Q c ouma� N — ' aE � 0 > ao a o a) ° o o 0a c ? p � co .0a) ° 4 m E mmcEc2 paU > ca, ° a) c wcoL a cc 2 u) ° oa'o a) 02 'V) a) oLO > E .0 d D5 L0 " wU5 aCY o i> m IO C O C moo ` m Y N C L C m `U , a) O a m O U X O - V N F o c E o °) aa a�� 'O ;o f Om O a� - C Em .O c c a) c -p -O a= 0 h ' F U E m 'U 'O O LL. a) ° U L U V m = d do co ° Q E m C> T W E ° v2m c ). . 0 U = Ea OStoy o °> ° U �° N -.� a a U C p � p N m n a) ° ` >` (a C N_ - >. E n o i c Z — mmo0o Oma c ' f m E() c mm m ) oom a) "cai d w a> °) i ww ° � ` 3 c F- m wo pc a c .cEa aoU � a d a � � ca 0. a c c m E _ w a N E N v N o �mma) � ° o = . m ma) O ° c u` 303 m aa) am > 0 c 45 ,_ p m r "- N " 2 Z d ` O m N y N o - .N U 0 Tv ,-m p o 0U y U Q N o c 0 O � �a) .p 2 < -p >. 0 o > U 'o a) rn.: Q 'c E v d a c U� p ° a CO . 0LN p -p O <IL ° C C I E 0 N , a 2 ° Jr. CO N w N - O a) m c to r, oaco d m mmomoa> od v = > o cpU - a n - m - U m o3 o v " E c F- Q .c o .5 aE ° 'v> a � O 03o a U � CC mo i Q (n ° m o C O F. ` a U O II s d C 2 E (n 0 `- N CO V to P414 0 U I- C O 10 0 a • E O 0 U U C of O V V V V ti) Z N N N N C V V 'd' V V N Cu 0 C a) C F y .4-,O a to > O C O 102 V V 0 •_ 2 > a a a a < Q Q Q < Q C C C C c O O o O O U U U 0 0 co u 0 U C C C C C ` J J J ` Cu Cu co Cu Cu N C n ° a n n C C c C C O c O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 cn mu 3 3 3 3 3 a m a a a C 'z a) N 0 a) N c c c c c•E y N 0 a) a) N D 3 > > F > IX cc K IX cc ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ co O) >. r C U .r '0 c O ,.0+ j N C C a) 2 ti 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d co 0 C 30 N C C C O 0 c(.2 co o d 0 d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a' w m m to m to m m m m m a) 'O j N C a) — C 'O a) 'O m L O)❑ 'O a) 10 L_ >.= C o L C N L no .L N 'NO C J N ° C ° °_) C cG 0 > L Zr.) 2 co .O. L to m co .c o 0 f0 ani `E al E 0 .c and _o O .yO odm0 m 3 2 a) o)C 0) a) N a) - '- N N L U ai F E_ m a) Q a) ¢ 2 -o a) O C -4) C •N 0 t1 (o U U O d N 0 0 — 0) a) a) N 0 a C > ° E N 0) O)L J a) ° N N w O N c 0 O '0 N 0 a) a) .0 20 -o C U co = J C •� L L 0 L >. 0 J 0 a N to' N > � c i(L) E E x 3 0 o a ° � 0 c_ o -0 co 3 .Co ' 3 _ Uf oo 0 a) o O L O a) ' a) p N 0 t`0 _ y N O 0 0 0 -0 U L U O (0 o o -0 co O" m >• U n = N O. U N .. O .•L-' > .>`. a N co N 3 4 O...sow C X To lT-O .- _ p N V) C •N. - N 3 O` (6 a) u) L ,_ ° C .L > °)o '// NO N 0) O 'C U U C �• .0 C y9- '@0` N N °- Q J J C N N-. co E J N CO '- a) 0_r u) — O U L J a O C E L d to d -0 - N m o n 0).N 0) C O n > N d'= '0) W T C a) a) U C 3 0 _ _C 0 0) a) 0 1) V .2c ` Z C n N Y o to to N 3 0 a) n N@ '00 N N - O 0' E -O 'y •• N@ O C O in d ° J yC . o d OI nC ° U 'O NU .030 C 6Q) .cN to0J _ (o5T.OV - cC cL a) O U L N a) N C ° C C h L co to z' 00 -0 Z - CO C_ C N - 0)�o to f_O N N V C t0 NU to ` C o . a) co_ m O 0) 0 -O 0 0-L O ,. > o a) i.„ o_-o- @ O OU C y N 0 O co W N O) C a) C .O. > m (o N L O - N O a) a) to N U@ N a C E N .6 O T _ '�c° p <a p O 2 N IX03aoawoW m _nUoocn000E >.cn3N maE NmWO od E C C 'j a) _ -O > rL Q 0 < 00 •o E a • • • • • • • • Hw to ...._.CC ,...,°- dmCc P a 2 E R P415 N ° w • E O 0 :% U C V V V V V V N O w Z V N N N N N N N CO CO F. L C N C a) I- r N R C O 2 _ Cu O u tF 2 > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 w w N w N w w to C C C C C C C C Cu co CO CO CO CO CO CO C a o. a a n n a a o S°-. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 `o co c w a3) a)a m a3) a3) a) a.) .`m CD a>i a>i a>i cu a>i Cl)> a) I= > Q cc ce cc w ct ce cc M co >. r C C) 'C C 0 o r o M p N m m 0 0 m 0 N 2u_ 0 0 a a U U a m d co ay C� in w ._ 0 O O 0 a2 m m m a a m m m • a.te ° � a) -o m po � to me Lw )rim � `oaio C3 ..LO.. O CO '- N ° O) a) O O w y 0 U N p, C O V 3 o c — c @ U a- 45 3 a S. 0 3 E c w m w m U d N .o a ° o ° CO O O -O L 2 a) 'O N ca C ' a) (6 ° V E o U c O L _ a C O N > C cn O d a O J m V' a) - > O O a) L O a) C = o N O O W U U w U 0 0 U) a) N 13 a N w w O O Cu n.- 2 '- .>. � - a) U C O f6 O L 0a) c � w = c co ci) U -2 -0 a) C > > > O `o > www Cu ° oca To WI a) ° '3w .cc a) N w fo c3 > o L '` m °' v vmac0i trn oaao c2ai a >. w9w2 w w E ai ) a o co °) O o and E °) � ' n." a) d 3 a) 4c: a) - m 7 > a o-Q of E m o E 2'w .a E wc oo -° 1p c 2 .N °a) m o 0 C O c ,' E c a1°i Ear E ° a) coE � o � o = o c? co) coo do -5 a) ° o .� o — d ° �DNd3 'Eai w �� � as _c N C O Cl) CO C w r O, C C O) O C O N O L c C) lD O L ( - E C r 2 ° L U OI L L O 3 w C L C L U a3 0 a1 a) l0 .p "O QI w c C " M U U w ¢ y o 3 2 g 3 v_) a) ° m o 3 .c Cl) L c w c a) c°) m .c )n ° c o o 2 o CO C C aC) CO C 0 a) C U C a) E ca C °- w CO w a) 'J 0I O U O" w O - "O N O a) Cu O C a) 2Y .O V ° E 02EE W y@Dc t ao 0- 3 o0 a) E3 °: 2om � m „° $ Y O W .N O U '= a) C CD .2 B - C a) o@ E p 50-.., ? -a 2 ` C c = d a o a a) d' o) m ;,, E L a) v H o co v m j a) o f E c°i co n n m a 3 0 Q a) o .E +i m c > L ca a) a Fa d Fowm - a ¢ ¢ ¢ o 0 O) N O O p O- c a) E m o -J r N C') v U)) tO P416 0 U o m c E O 0 O U C co co co 0 co Z N N N a) V C o 0 C c_ o I- w 0 m > 0 '- C g 0 al L O ,_ L c 2 > 0 0 co c N c CO is wo O N a N O r O y O y C w N C C E y a) C a) ,C I- > d' LL. CC LL cn CD T r C U '0• C 0 C N a) c) co m m m op 0_ O) y C a O U) C C O O 0.2 re ,Q a a of"- T C m L O "O N ' — C N C co "O a) o c C N N N c o a) m T' C a) m m m m m .- 0 N .o O -c -c 0 0 a) .O = o N a) v 0 o .� c0• 'L.' O 9 3 m 0j O 'O •• C C m m .7 O C O N m " a) d C N N o C m 'O C a) C C U O m 41 N N .L.. d a) U w m N a) O m C O X .0 J O O c N a) c NN U a) • a) m O. c .3 'o Y Y U j .o m � L U o .5a) E ;= '� E oCE ,,r,- ) .t NN3 oC waC S ° OC E U O• O N C o m .N+ w a) a) j N M L O .c C ~ O N a) O U L.. 'NO 0 m r o d ` o N � -o0 o a�0 0 E W N C i_ c o c "' c w E o o_ � L � c >. o- N V '§ 0 m C L 0 'C_ O 4 'O O a) CO > 000a) vo _c � 0a, 3 ~ r � EvT -- 0 N � v ;Oa a)a m Cl a) .0 O N o m O) a) m N C 3 C N m N C aa) mo)u * -c E `.,= m UE a) -) 3 o a-°) 5 0) m m Em a) v N c = ca in cU o ci,a c E c ac E m = m O O F- v ° = N .O d ,> ty .c 0 0) >.'O U U 0 o 0 - _ a m 'C t 'E_ o m m ) O o. U a a m O O rz C a) .L+ N O 3 N 6 >•• 0) m C O O C = O C N m T ; O C E d' a) 4 > CO C Cr) U C• 0 a O m 0 m o 7 73 y O) " N OU a) 0 0 .n N C .O a) m m -O m I 2 L a) 0 0 m w U t CU U N -.-• C Si- C m C "O .m0 .«%- -0 CU L. N CO L 04 N a 7 U C 9 O = . O CO fA .D a) a) c S] U r CO 5 C L m m U w N N a) m CO 4 0)= C@ L r O C C C m C ._+ O U ` w L 3 N C N p-C L O 0. O N N m Q C 0 0)Q L j 0 o 3 0 N m L O V .0 _0 " N N U = ._m O L N 7 N m N N J I d 'O C N -0 a) c .L_, N a) N C �. O N .+ O c 0) ›.. ,-- -0 m L ~ E O C I c O d O 0 d O_ m N C F m N d `O L L N N V m 10• E C = 0 o 0. = L1 0 C N C a) 0 I- o o � 7' L O = r O N ai m N .0 C L c L (p C m N 0)d .L.. N 0 N m CT U U = -O O C O 0) O.- a m F- y ILI a m 'N .L.. C H 3 0 0 I- T m L. c P a 2 E N N P417 a) O c 0 I w a c E O O ++ U o c m O v v v -a- en Z co M M on N a :=. a) F a) c Y CD CO > 0 C W O 9 CO O 0 E. w > ° ° ° ° °a a) c a a a a C 2 2 2 -c c 2 C 0 0 O O N O O 0 O O •o ca N N N C w N N N N > > > C C _ > cc 3 i= > CC cc � ac cc ca >, r c 0 w om o 0 tO 0 O m 0 m 2u_ 0 0 0 a 0 cu a co N C ao 'N 0 0 0 0 0 a2 m m m N 0 Kw a a a d a a' _c N Y Z Y r N O c Y O o 0/ o i 'L-' 0 N C 0 O) 01 19 'C N -c a) a� a) L 0 N O - 0 ,r C O c L O1 N 0 > 'a N t ` U N 0_Y Ls NO 'Q 0 y 01 C 0 c N o 2 ° w o-'� = '--N c o J o O a7 o o v>a a 00 O >O m .0 N °' Oa 0. E o f °pmt � � Or :° .Nm � m m �' NLa� .E � mocc 2c 0.yovima`)co� rni (6oca _ ° o3a0i >oCf awi odci' m oo2' m E � coo -c 0 01 m "-' U .N O co -O O 0. m Q.L. Y O Q .E CO 0 v D) N D' 3 C L_ i m Q c -° , a) N O E C a O - ° o �_ ..L.. O co > T ° •° '� 0 0 (u T O O O .T. m O a) N 0 m a) �C N 0_ co O. • v T w mommQc .. m `= t00 ccom wcmO'N $ rno .Ec0iO) L Caai0.- 0 NI L O O' C O -.-. m e w a) � N °- -° N � CO � Q .W N Vi.0 O N � '2 E ° mo o 0mm ° Nt E -ow o � co 0'' d ' 0B000mc a= om .E (D co 1 =, m a) ° 2 °' 5 N ° `o > 0 a C O L O) ll.l C N 0. O o co N O o c U Z0 U 1] m W N c E o m o C 0 ,(m0 3 N .- o j c m r Cl) m m c 0 4- v C ,r_ .00 , 0 _ a) 'm 0 ._ m -O 01 N 0_0 0 w 0 0 E L CO a N O - co d - 3 ID >a, c c c . o cr 'u 0 O m N o 'c 'o, '" c c E c 3 '3 E o " v m E03 E ' wm 0) u = aoia 3c mao a co Scoyro ° 00b2 (D 0m NQ Y d = g " NO °c 8w ' oc° N '- Nc ' am o ° tea° � c cm alnf0co r E d W O' 00 a'c .Lu o 0 O C c 01 d V c0 0.« .W o = E N a°i N '0 c 0 U .0. ,_ N > .tin a O 2c U Tc0On4- a E w ° w omU2N -c o_amac.0 °1nm .Em 'woEaE ° Emi!' coE cc i c0 > E ° 00 0 a) 10 92 m a N ` R E -c w `m v . m w ca 0 • • • rnd 'as Las .s O." 0 2 E ) P418 0 coo A a c E O 0 C , C a5 O N2 V V v co co co as P a C a) C iE y 123 V ca > 0 C o ;a 'O Al O 0 2 > 0 0 a 0 0 r r r r -c o a a a a a c 2 d 2 d 2) o ° `o `0 0 0 0 co ca 0 m a) a) > > '> > '> i= > a) Cl.) CC CC CC m A co C O • .` C O 0 w c co a) 2 u. 00 00 00 0 0 CO CL 0) a) c 728 N =' C C O O 0.2 re o 0 0 m aa.a m a) m O C C jn m -° �a c a) co ' a) = N a a - c c o -co 0 0 0 C 0 +c O m,0 0 C a) > O L `) .e .c .c 0 C N - m C) ) c 'c O c- O c6 m — O m C - U C l4 o N E N .O y _�.0 E 2 a N C 0 C a) 0 N c a) N ° U O �D at v0) a E o E m oa c ° m a� ° cw E ° ` E• N = ft ® 'O E o) a) r`•a O a >_ c > `) o O o 0 c 0 o N d 0 x:-030 Z — o .w � 2 = ca ° ifsfo° 02 Ema. va)) .. �` wo) m p m c E c a ° a N N O 2 rn� t -c E t c a c ° c m ° o c c c •N aF T� p = 0 �, ain 'aoo " a - 'c � � � ma) dcrn ° y to ma�` E ac 0 ° > N ° p N a ° a) ai.�_ 3 o 'E w .0. 0 rn a N a o a V j m O° j N '00 ON ° O ?i l0 O9. N .� 0 ,- (0 oU0 N 0m > ° wNa 0 �' c m0 0 c ° � = c � ° a° � ` cpOa a° a3orN -O > ° armor0_ NE o � myo Z O m `� N ..:3 `O @ N C _ a a r N a) L N ( 2@ N c fa T O a 0 0 a) "2 0 j 3 'O d Q N m a m °' °- °) O m m C a a N 2 p o am) 0)L O o a E 1a C N 0 c C 7 0 0 yf c oL � co LT. C c 0 ' m a_ ° 'a 0 2 > -o _ a`) E aa`) L E 0 ma > ) O@ 0NH4- cNTm_, N 0) o o NZ = C J .0 N 00 Z. a >O u) h• cCOm mo mrn ` a ° a ` °) `) E = m ' ° D u) c a) _ ra) N_ o0NEoE ° onm ° m am E m T m CA 0 ..J N 5.,-= E N E 0 a N < co o -a .- N L a E o a _ c O_ N _.. m (.0 a) O! N a) c c c E c — N m a 0 o m C D co O N m 'E J J 0 0 0 a ` 0 ° C 0 m2 tmao• oEm E E . E • • • • O) 0- 2 E N P419 0 0 ,_ C O 03 a C• E O O U O• C )0 O NZ v v v v c v 0 N F. 'O C S. d . L V _ O r O ._ L F d c c c II c c O O o 0 0 co CAT r C U 'c C 45 0, j .. N- C Cr a) 2 it 0 0 0 0 0 0 d CA C' C `, Q C ii; C C 0 0 O O aE 0 ° 0 m 0 0 0 03 0 o d) O _L T"" C N L T O C N g 21 T c = L_ oda � w 3 T3 E 3 E N Ea m � m .N L 0 - ,0 �- 3 N N N - N N U_ CAC a) U 0 .O 0 m a) 'O .0 CD -O a N a) ) 0 mot., N N c '' c a) U ° � d � 0 a m E E c a 2 a� rnm ° = o a) L° E 0 •E) d -0 _ '0 o c 0 0 2 O -o C �_ �i c L T N O-'-0 3 2 � = ai � � °� N t a) m N o N a) a) a) 8 . O E ,c y0 a) . O a.-_- - a) 'O .y L E (n U C (Oa' c .c N c i ° L N N ._ N N ca N N V) c N o 0 (0 a) c o 3 ` O . `° y oN ° ° E cmo co W 3dL Laa , Lc .o .c 'c. .0 d y a) L a m N y 0 2 _ N w a) m C E W > 0 3 O o 471 1/) C C = o N �co - In O O .° U 3 c h' ° a) )°n a N (D o - d j N N -, U N > O ° O. o O_c E C 2 a calm O •• N -° O N O U ° O N 0 `� > C CA- .- a) >, N c .- CO Y OU ,C N Z c a) CA_ U C u) U N ° O N N N CC C L O 'U E 3@ �. ° ° N _ N N N (6 m N@ N L (6 a m c m c � 'O O r O E _ ° -O Y U o 0 N l0 E 0 0 0 T - Cn 0 c a CO O a) Y "O N - N c U o) L +'_. N ° c L U U@ wco -O L.7 U 10▪ t7) To L C d N CA a U U C c a) "O N a) C N C U_ 0 N c 2 a) as N -0 N .N C 3 N a) O a 0 .N a) 0 N C U 'O 2 O o-• d CA N. a) .- >> c a m 0)-a .w N U ° a E N of 0 .> c N O 'O.0 c N F N O U c ! co: O C r c 0 .N CO ° `O U m-o CU V ? c N O a .Y 0 co > y d ° v o ° v° o' ac c m N o C C• :I:.. a) N 'O N M -0 co 0 OU L Z' c (` N a) Q C U ti E a) N N Cr) N 0 N 0 c N 'O a' .� 0 O 0 (0 L .o c E o C U - 0 0 0 'a L 0 = a) E Q L N E o L 0 L o E c L a L 'P E c..F- N m a) v 10 LL m U > > U U 3 a a) U CO a3 .c a) c I- F co 0 V' -, co a) H U 0 (a . , _0 -4 p) m o ° .- O. U U O N L 2 E (n N CO Cr- co r N P420 o o A c E O 0 v.0U c m o O Z V V V V N N N N To V C a) w a) ti a) a) > 0 w C 0 ., V O 0 ._ t c Na 2 > Q < Q Q 0 0 0 c c c c o 0 0 0 0 0 - - U U U U = j _ 2 2 w O c c C C U O O iy o o 0 d 0 0 DI U 0) 0) 0) 0) U 0) 0) C w c c c c C c a a c E 0 = _ = J CO = _ F > 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 M 0) 1 C U 4 0 C 0 ri = 00 C Cr a) * U. 0 U 0 CO cC Q d 01 w c a C w' C C C O O 0.2 m m m m Q• w m a m 0 1]O N S 0 Y O ° « 0 0 �a O o N E C D -O 0 v c ) C E '0 00 a O - = d O of p)o O _ D — a) C = E N . E - a) O - U - V L1J N a) L' N N O O V fo a3 c mE Uc oU a) rnw 0 L m co- :_ oc N 0 L 'E coo = -c o f c -0U 0 = v4- E m o n c c ° a a 0 o Q H E E m -O y n m E 0i ? o 002 m aa)) uu)) 0 a) 0 c a CD ° 0Ua v = E '- ° o (-a 0 (130 .ab -0 � o = E ° 0)- E m a m r c r v o m c o as m m � ° a) 0 a) co oET 5Un' aa)) E0 � o m � N - � ° Xom Et C -0 E 5a ° m - E 0 m E = c o o a) o o a s m m W N U a m L t a ° E o O m N o v Is_ N V o as u) t O O 0) (n '0 -C 0 O (n 0 0 = O >c O ( m = = O co E O O co O C1 0 E O Z - a O w L (o V O (o U C E N N O .L-. - O E C -0 E C p V ~ (_/) a) C C c O c .0 c C a1 a) c O c t E a) Q a3 O o = a) c .0 = - c = a=) ° c _com = `) 00E ° Uoo0 a) (nm cCV a) cw °m roc V =.41 = L O , m m ya0 a) N � Ems' 0a7O 00 '5 = 'p � - U _o U))0 as Q -c c a) C 3 3 -o O c c as U T c V = m CO CO CO 0) 070E - w ` E 0 0 0Q000a) Eo0 oczn ` a) mLwcE c0io) `) Y co C a) c_ N O N 0 •` a) 0 0 0 U U U N C E O 0 = 0 O = ' 0 00.0-0 "O C 0. O O ` O O N 0) O d '� a N ,- O D 0 0...= V -0 L V (0 a) O O d ca CO >,0 0) 5 0 . . '6EI -c ¢ c ac) 0c Ew0 ad � .EE0cco � u°)) H (caEmL 0o_V � E3 -C OmSo • 2 M C (f) CO -01 r N (`7 P421 0 L) . c o m w c c E O 0 U U U C c c c 0 co Z N N N in CU C N r_ w a) . co• 0 U • C o C, m 0 o u .0 IC m '. 2j P422 a) 0 L. c O 95 t a c E o 0 U I C M c 0 v v v v fA Z N N N N Co N is m c a) C F y c .. a) co > O w C O w O ,_ L � E > 0 0 0 0 U) 0 N CO cco m co m c a a a n O '.• O-+ 0 Z. 0 0 cw a) a_) a_) a) E `) a' a' a' aa)) I- > CC CC CY cC Cl) o) C U O w 'C c O C▪ a 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 U U 0 N 2 it m m m m 0) m d C) a) C ;n O C C O O a2 K 2 m 0 0 m s. a) •O) C T N a) W a) "O U C N N 0) = C '0 O N C a) L O O N a) L C O m U 0 '0 i 0 0 )` O (0 .0 C C N ._ C U L O E ? O C .. y) OI .0 .J 'O _ w -o > a) o O N ~ 3 E .° .° o `-' (6 cn a) ' O a) O > L 1.1 = O U N N U a) E co a) N O O O "O a N N C C ... O a C . = N a) a) E J c ` O a V) m E m a na o � aC En cn > c - c c as z o - E - ° E a °' o co o ° a oEF ocor2.- a) aC -a a ° a) La -o .c d3 cu a c CO (n d a in li C 'y O N -o C t Ol m U X.0 m L a1 V) 0 0 > E a) 0 � � � 0_ 07N L@ � m � o � � cu) Q � 3y � c p )nOO � d `nn • C a) E N O > a3 a) C@ ' C@ .L.. v N .0 'C a] O �p _0 L C t tar. a Y %- CO a a) 0 v) E a crn- wwm = $ vu mdu �upED .0E2 � c w 'y _° 3 a) a)om ° 2 •m O L _ V a O) O _° a 0 > o a a) E O .O. E a) 0 la-) -o a m m a E a) :o o c E c E c m o o n c m o ' c = � o o C a) c _ mo a o aQ o o m .� o rnT ° 0C- ° rnao 0 '3 as c • COCO OTiN � � aamcLn -°° NcoUOa�io °io)oE � � oa � ° ° n tom = 2mmN 70 0 inam m .L.. aa)) c � oo_2EoC � mom0mN � o- V; in cCUCD 'NO a a) • -o o co ° o- m i E .- .E o u o -* O c co- . a) c C t c 3 `0 ° 2 b 3 o _al > o a) O) C Q O C 0) 'O c 'O c O YO a) C T._ I C W C E m n .L. J 0 0 O d 0) C 0 - Cn C 4p 0 o N E U I O 2 N c a) 2 LL --30 C a C 6 .- N EO la o 0) co O. =O N c L o N E ? N E 0N) '5 N 0 OU '« E c aa0a70� aa) E < s2E ,_ � wE 5a) cr) Ea) a) n `o .._ 0coa5 0u) w ° • a) o_ o ° co) o 22 E CO 0 — N Cl) O a) P423 U C O N a c E O o U O C c c Rs o v v v v 0 Z N N N ("1 N V C a) c F a) a) ai > O C O 2 V A O . - E > 0 a 0 0 co V) co co C C C C N a) m co C d d n d o O :+ O O O O co C L a) a) N N > > > > CD CC M co T r C U `— .0 C O j ,-O O pm U U U U a° )2 )i m m m m C13 a C) a) ,__ it C C C C O O CL Si co 0 m 0 a m m N W U) c N N V a) a) co O a) a) C 'O N a) Q) a C C O a s N c a) a s N t a) 4 o ° O_ a) r v C U Y j a a3 C a E1 ° o E m m N a my iL o � a o > m U m U Y W O N N c �' W N O m a) c ° ` 22 >> i_ C O O °' O Y c y ° `o .° y c co .cm c > ° c '�o m ° o En .°- E mE as ° aE m > m oz °: gQ 0a) a) gQ v OLJcoac .5NO_ dW my � >.� ° � � c c a 0 a) a c a • d E ° 1° o a) m >` c d c .N w c U' m U °)._ .N a) > c -c a) .T. c E N O V) a a > 0) = 'O a) -° a C a) O c E ._ )a m U v vi v c °- o c 0 )a E c .E c a) O =° a aj E _=- 03w 0 a) OC1 d a) ? N = .7 U U �'O c L m a) d Y N m O -a)`° a3 .L.. V C N O a = 0 0 X 1 r —_ -a a) C N U -5 c L a1 5 w •p a) m@ L c ° O) (0 E E -o mo E -p00 `°_ - Esc ° opa' E n ° m con NE !3 ° . cu L moo c m m •C r Cn ° E m m Cn m m w E L .E N a) o a) m a o . C7 m m N a 2 c c o ) L >> • O c L >> N O a) S) E O CA > a) a7 O N w > >`N O X N > >. X m a) N >, 3 c a) L al rn a) f, N U; a) ._ U U z E 1l a1 -0 O .a`)) a) C -a E T�a 5 L- U O CO C N = L... c N N E U C - C a) U m N (a - N m O '> 'O C N V Q) ._ U) d N d to moa ° � � a) EE OC 2CE aa 'r ° o � � G> E � co = >. cm3o .. co - Oro 2 .2 N °- Sl a) d a) °) a) d C 'O _ CA N a) a1 U o N N v o c )a v) o c m -0 c E c a) = > ° u, L .E c c a) .z` U a) c 0 < o 5 a - - a) ' a °- X ca (0 -7. .92 Oo _ rn= a) '''‘f r 0) CO a a a))) a a0 a a) a � 2 E m.o 0 w co � c .� � � o � 'z"-o 14 E � D � 04 o `_az oac) i, oc mQc � a) „,c a � cL.. cc "ca) > a) c0N Q .4o- d0a) 2 = cN � � oc of 'CEO H7a .s -0m Haa .s ° � - 04- a) m ° a) EwP � a` mm�� 00nEwEzc � a` a ic, CL 2 E )O co r r N a) P424 0 o A a c E O 0 r "• c v M co 0(/7 Z N V V N Ti is 'O C N C L N R.. C O 40-. 0 c O ._ . E 0 CD 0 2 > a Q Q c c 0 0 co 15 U C J 3 (a C . N N w O C C O i7 O O O 0 0 0) O) _ w C c I- > a 0 0 Co O) T C O O '0 C O 0 CV E c U (i 2 U U a a) as a 0) me .1728 'y w C C 0 0 0.2 in tY2 0 m m O)"" " -0 N O CO C 'O C a) O a) T C N T C T= (a N N N a) N C C Q) '- w N (a C O o E c Oc .- CO n y ' 0 = a7 . N = Y i a) � oaaU . t O . gc o o o : a) co r -c, L0 .— c .5 = m -' aa)) 0 0aZ 0UEa ,_ o '> _ Yioo w . oa r °'�° rnof � o0as = co a) N co N N a '"C-O rn w al 'O >: N O.c0 = p N c- N V C C a' 0 C E � 2 a) m > c m :- o N o . .20 - > t c a) C . N ' rc o _ a, moo 0 a c � o � w F- d o .n o � ,� v _>,-a., NEN N U 'U rnEya) 00 — EOL m O. N 'V >, Um - (aN > TZU)'aw = � Co2 c0U '0E3 = � m � oN o � QoinE � sd � 0 � c v d .- N C _@ o a) (a ]C N pO O C U T r.. O) N (n ~ N co N N U CO � « ,oc � .. t � ° U OcNmE cCa c0 cic0m ncato a) E o o E = ac)co Z S N C ` a) O E a' N a � N CO C O O) N O °" 0 0 U L -O a1 0 C 13 E N C Z .0 N N a .- a) ` N U o O >. V Y U E o 0 .0 J a7 = N -° � o ^ CWc � a) T � 0 m E = Y2 = thv 0a, o N 'ua) ca Q Z a) O a) W O° .O m N = c0 N F . N E CO O m V ( ° " E -O co a)a) > E 2:-- L = ,_,4- @ CO OI a a) U T� Z O U m N U O U � c N ` d � ` N d - .0 N 0 cn C a7 a3 N la .- a O > .`- 2 a) O C 'O O = = O O = 'O = C ... C = a`' _° w U Z N = O L _0 Oct N N ° N N a) N _ a' N " m to C N N a > C C 0 j N C E (a C N O C (a d.. N '� .-c ca 0 C U > co > O m =. U C = O o cu C o a) 0 0 0. V =a)) =a). ` - O = 0.w 'O D 0 0 C E OX N _CO N y 0 . X O mEab0 wm �. C 0 a`. oNmoc -o On o :! 000ENCoM 3a) om a) m m o o F. 0_ 0) a) E v) W r 5 Si P425 0 C.) -FF i_ C co C T w .CI3 a co CL N a, a C E O O ° w a U Cl i• U ° CO' O a co c c ° oo (o 0 ° `° a) CO CO Z < . a m e o c `w N a) m a) O o co 0- CO c 0 U a a D 0 0 me C s .c t _ o o L L L a o ) A W O t " c 3 3 3 co a a U O ea � p co — N m v co (o N- C O c V A m O u a L w N N C a)la 0 E > Q < 76 65 2 in c c a. -L O O o ° a 0 U 0 Q a)CC co € m w 0 C C c 0 a O 7. 0 00 C a°) >. C 0 0) Cr) > N c s y C c C O) N N `m > > o a) Q v m > ❑ ❑ O N L c d ai 'C OOa0) co O> T 0 c- c Q m U 0 0 O 0 O• d C N LL a a • a co o m o o ° d ao CO 0 > 0 2 > 0 0 w m = 0 a) 00 ,°0 LL Z o 0.c• O CO U 0) C O o Ti. o) C C L c a) 2 ❑ O ▪ L o o O ti a 2 w I a t c a C a - 0 0 `o o a o c oE >` c .co o a) > 0 > co-0 O.O m 0 .- .0 - .m _0 C C cu (0 N a) M = 0)= t a3 N N CO C 0 a) .N-. O 0 0 c E co O. N cc) O U) 0 CO N CO 0 0 a) tq C ._.. N N a)40 m = dC -o - No - OO nco > N — E J (0 0 `� C 0 O C N O (0 N C U 3 C — c "E — al .=0-. N O co ` — 0 d C d V '30 r 2 • 0 3c all - O >.•mmaco) c = :-0-0 > O c a) w O N L ° - 0 re > u`0) c N N 00 00. c -r( 0) a)a) : d a 9 m ' m a) N C 0 .0 a) 0 "O = — — O vi C o w v a) co 3 N O -00 = vi = )`— 'Ott E Y O` < 0 > ° a o go a N > co a) •' CO N E 0 `o ° `o 'N N 0 N o a) N . c CO >+ a) 0 0 0 0 a) Q V o la C a) a)) a) a) � Em ` cdii0Cwowaci ~ = � u o co a) ao >' o oa O a) ° � .c O m v a m vw a N 0 N oa0i2E a) � 0 3a) 'v ' v > m � c � U y E cw9UU ++ E CO 0 L F co I .0 o 'a Q 3 co a s -00 m 2 Cp 0 co = 5 o m ca y 2 0, , O. U m d LL a) 40 0 0 w 0 0 0 * E M .. Y um U O. U m n. w P426 •� s ' } City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912, Development Review DRC2013-01083, and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2013-00887, and Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00626. Public Review Period Closes: August 13, 2014 Project Name: - Project Applicant: Manning Homes Jim Manning/Craig Kozma Project Location(also see attached map): Located within the Medium(M)and Low Medium(LM) Residential Districts between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue at the north side of the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail -APN: 1076-181-01. Project Description: The proposed project is a subdivision of a property of 7.16 acres(5.06 net acres) into 45 lots (Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18912) and construction of 45 single-family residences (Development Review DRC2013-01083). The underlying General Plan land use designation is Medium Residential. Therefore, the project includes Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00887 to change the zoning of the east part of the project site from Low Medium (LM) Residential to Medium (M) Residential in order for the zoning of that part of the project to be consistent with the General Plan designation of Medium Residential. As development standards such as lot dimensions, setbacks, lot coverage, etc.for single-family residential development within the Medium Residential District are not addressed in the Development Code (only multi-family residential development is discussed), the project includes Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00626 to insert these standards. Also included is Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00889 for the removal of the trees on the property to allow the construction of the aforementioned houses and Minor Exception DRC2014-00161 to allow the construction of walls that will exceed, by 2 feet, the height limit that applies to walls in residential districts. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga,acting as the lead agency,has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted,the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. P427 NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. August 13, 2014 Date of Determination Adopted By P428 ORDINANCE 868 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2013-00887, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE ZONING DESIGNATION OF PART OF A PROPERTY OF ABOUT 7.16 ACRES LOCATED BETWEEN ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND RAMONA AVENUE, AT THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC INLAND EMPIRE TRAIL, ABOUT 1,400 FEET NORTH OF BASE LINE ROAD FROM LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL TO MEDIUM (M) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT IN CONJUNCTION WITH A PROPOSED 46-LOT SUBDIVISION; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT OF -APN: 1076-181-01. A. Recitals. 1. Manning Homes filed an application for Zoning Map Amendment DRC2013-00887 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Zoning Map Amendment request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of August 2014, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. On the 17th day of September 2014, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on September 17, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a parcel located between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue, at the north side of the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail, approximately 1,400 feet north of Base Line Road; and b. The project site is a rectangular parcel with an overall area of approximately 312,000 square feet (7.16 acres). The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 1,200 feet deep (east to west) and 250 feet (north to south); and c. The project site is generally vacant with the exception of a single-family residence that was built circa 1915 that is located at the east side of the project site near Ramona Avenue; and P429 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 868 ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2013-00887 — MANNING HOMES September 17, 2014 Page 2 d. To the west of the project site, is an equestrian/pet supplies retail store; to the north and east are single-family residences; and to the south are an apartment complex and a mobile home park; and e. According to the Zoning Map adopted by the City Council on July 18, 2012, the project site is currently within two zoning districts. The western half of the project site, an area of approximately 147,000 square feet (approximately 3.37 acres), is zoned as Medium (M) Residential District. The eastern half of the project, an area of approximately 165,000 square feet (approximately 3.77 acres), is zoned as Low Medium (LM) Residential District as shown in Attachment A to this resolution; and f. The General Plan land use designation of the project site is Medium Residential shown in Attachment B to this resolution; and g. The change of the zoning of the project site will make it uniformly Medium (M) Residential as shown in Attachment C and consistent with the General Plan designation of Medium Residential; and h. The zoning of the property to the west is Medium High (MH) Residential District. The zoning of the properties to the north is Low Medium (LM) Residential District. The zoning of the properties to the east is Low (L) Residential District. The zoning of the properties to the south (beyond the aforementioned trail) are partly Medium High (MH) Residential District and partly and Low Medium (LM) Residential District; and 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed Zoning Map Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for the logical development of the surrounding area; and b. The proposed Zoning Map Amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and c. The proposed Zoning Map Amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a P43O CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 868 ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2013-00887— MANNING HOMES September 17, 2014 Page 3 Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The City Council has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The City Council further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the City Council hereby accepts the recommendation of the Planning Commission to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The City Council has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The City Council hereby accepts the recommendation of the Planning Commission to adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the City Council adopts Zoning Map Amendment DRC2013-00887 as identified in this Ordinance and shown on Attachment C. 6. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. ' P431 if�1 I j rJ _ SJ9 : I i 3M!HSA139 1 ,-ftiA..-, ..--, \-...,___.""- ...I C:1411( i III! 'r: - -'''',' :' '.-Ji t , • ilk' VNOy11VN 71F-7- .1 • 1.--40eFir .' • .., i .., 1 lam .. I. . ,. ....• - . NOi ONll2lb F .. . . = a'c� W 1 ' o W 1� 1iI{ Illia Ca (X t s sr ....- L j .?. - - 1- e ': ' .: .!'-:-. mr. .. a 0 N %NO1ON!X3l in 'v m : ,... mi.... -it ] a. �' 7 01 -I' Q _ 1 ' '.... I 7-----ss,,i t I. . — CO I '''. " 4. ---# . .0 g co To" C -_ . 'ta . . • x dli3 • i:31) . •_ 1 . _ 10 1 .i . .,t,, i — c.) 0 1.44 r. , i . ,....,,, . .,_., c; a r3H0 O ; - NOLM3N a 11/01/408V e ri r 1 .... P11111111F— Zw mm _mil c � T .. 1t :p o, . ._ ... -.1 co.12 46 r OC :. ,....... .ATTACHMENT A : _. - L. , .. . P432 ,I ,- -,-., is 048381, , +ii,, , ` . • 32/1HS)!.38 as - 1 is 4VII ' S r ' CO¢ � t le O > 111 t V; -..1'swag,. .to-g r,. £ ft ill -,„ lir -: IX,.. }..: -., ►Now - - 1 f ; 1 , ivie . .. *Ritte V 1 ' k MOO , ! di, , NOIJNl721t/ _ f E - ,$ c Igi ,y • Cl) e ct +, :. , _ o�c ' 2 - , 4 _i____ 0 p,1-- ,t,„_ I -11.11 ‘1.:1-' - -o (5 W y Q P' I 01, . . . it r M NOIDNIX31 f ,� _ 1..__. T( b1 1 r,, 9 le J NA` �- ► , ,a. tr NC 1 }' 1 tO 1, mei'CZ 616-1 dl v - V „.., , ,. � ,,,,, 9 ` „... co „3N015, .. NQIM3N.94, i r.ir t� /off ^�/}/ _ , - .. Q7VE HQ J r-, E _ * -At 1 d .N C + 6 C z * � 33 p 0. . . Z d 41 ATTACHMENT B . _, • P433 S)12139 f 31:1114 S)RI39 ° t cn w tLJ VNOIAV del I .1111111 V 1 -. :tit ' ,, 1,,__. ,_ j 1, ,, i ( w v 'NQLJN72/d E per . .. ., I . . -Ji .. ., oil 112 O U 1 I y ti 4'i .-.g ,_�_ '. 11,.. ' et . Ns CO NaLONIX37 1 •—_:.= ,ers ) U\ : a I c. 1111110 END an - A 3o °N . a I r.3HpQ q '41 .;., .. .. 4,----J , , \ .= gci. 1 liti As, . ._ 1 . ____,z — ' \.E: 1); cm 7 d I le! a, 0 2 5.S .. � 'o ' NQLM3N-- r a 07V BI HOdV -1Q — V t V w ' 5 . _ E ' a,2 � o 8o • ATTACHMENT C - 1.. ;" - -A P434 ORDINANCE 869 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014-00626, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT CODE TO INCORPORATE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SUCH AS MINIMUM LOT DIMENSIONS, SETBACKS, LOT COVERAGE, ETC. FOR SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE MEDIUM (M) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. Manning Homes filed an application for the approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00626 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Code Amendment request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of August 2014, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. On the 17th day of September 2014, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all-of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing September 17, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. Currently, "basic" development standards are not provided in Table 17.36.010-1 of the Development Code; and b. These standards describe the requirements for minimum lot area, minimum lot dimensions (width, depth, street frontage, etc.), building setbacks, lot coverage, etc. and are necessary in order to guide the City and applicants in developing residential projects that are consistent with the General Plan, in accordance with the objective of the applicable development district (zoning), and comply with other standards and guidelines described in the Development Code; and c. As the standards do not exist, a set of development standards have been created for incorporation into the Development Code and is shown as Attachment A to this Ordinance; and d. These development standards will apply to all single-family residential projects that are proposed in the Medium (M) Residential Districts in the City except within areas of the City governed by separate specific/community plans such as Terra Vista, Victoria, and Etiwanda. In those P435 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 869 DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014-00626 — MANNING HOMES September 17, 2014 Page 2 • specific/community plans, such development standards already exist or, if they don't exist, will require separate review and action by the City and, therefore, are not subject to this amendment; and e. This request is in response to a proposed single-family residential development that was proposed by Manning Homes that contemplates a 45-lot subdivision of a vacant parcel of about 7.16 acres within the Medium (M) and Low Medium (LM) Residential Districts, located between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue, at the north side of the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail, about 1,400 feet north of Base Line Road -APN: 1076-181-01; and f. In the absence of development standards for single-family residential development in the Medium (M) Residential Districts, Manning Homes would not be able to develop the property as proposed; and g. Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00626 conforms to and does not conflict with the General Plan, including without limitation, the Land Use Element thereof, and will provide for development in a manner consistent with the General Plan. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed Development Code Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for the logical development of the surrounding area; and b. The proposed Development Code Amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and c. The proposed Development Code Amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Table 17.36.010-1 entitled Development Standards for Residential Zoning Districts is hereby deleted and replaced by Table 17.36.010-1 amended in words and figures as shown in Attachment A of this Ordinance. 5. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. P436 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 869 DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2014-00626 — MANNING HOMES September 17, 2014 Page 3 b. The City Council has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The City Council further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the City Council hereby accepts the recommendation of the Planning Commission to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The City Council has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The City Council hereby accepts the recommendation of the Planning Commission to adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 6. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in. Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 above, the City Council adopts Development Code Amendment DRC2014-00626 as identified in this Ordinance and shown as Attachment A. 7. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. P437 Chapter 17.36,Table 17.36.010-1 of the Development Code is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: TABLE 17.38.010-1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS Deviilermi ani Stiadaidtp:thin ,P-2.:,:.-l'''4.-70;„.tii,`LI`P;DC+4,..T-1::. .13,1' _--,--c-, .,:e%°F, .,-q,,,C,,',/ ' ',i,:s.,'1/4f4.'t.,.$::,;,VIL•rtif; -!.':ii:.*Littik .1A.”( 11.M.k2e, '."- Poriti.n1V '4 4''Illiint-- tr-25.011414X6r. 10 r!,:14.k.b.4i ' r-''.z.',,,o` Lot Area(minimum) 20,000 sf 7.200 sf 5,000 sf 4,000 sf 3 ac"' 3 ac z 3 ac z Lot Area(minimum net avg) 22,500 sf 8,000 sf 5,000 sf 4,000 sf 3 ac'' 3 ac" 3 ac"I Lot Width(minimum) 90 ft z 65 km 50 ft(11 45 ft n/a n/a n/a Lot Width(corner lot) 100 ft 70 ft 50 ft 50 ft n/a n/a n/a Lot Depth(minimum) 200 ft 100 ft 90 ft 80 ft n/a n/a n/a Minimum Frontage 50 ft 40 ft 30 ft 30 ft 100 ft 100 ft 100 ft Minimum Frontage(flag lot) 30 ft 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft 50 ft 50 ft 50 ft 4414411*ifilitt(dwelling units per kelilatJ'iitc,,,,W47.1,:t,c,:59.14MlirViskr4,44-0i1Vtirir,cwia::U6'-: ' Minimum Density" n/a n/a 4 du/ac 8 du/ac 8 du/ac 14 du/ac 24 du/ac Maximum Density 2 du/ac 4 du/ac 8 du/ac(41 14 du/ac 14 du/ac 24 du/ac 30 du/ac Minimum 30161iiiitZ.:Arrintig.SN't.2-.4aall-WINNIS'AIWW-35.W.fe,43,-Enttilt::).5114,iMMate: Front Yard z 42 ft'" 37 ft(6) 32 ft re, 27 ft te) 37 ft'I" n/a n/a Corner Side Yard(5' 27 ft 27 ft 22 ft 17 ft 27 ft n/a n/a Interior Side Yard z 10/15 ft 5/10 ft 5/10 ft 5/5 ft 10 ft'1 n/a n/a Rear Yard'" 60 ft 20 ft 15 ft 15 ft 10 V' n/a n/a At Interior Site Boundary NR'•' 15/5 " 15/5 z 15/51 (Dwelling/Accessory Building) P1400400igitt*A.ONO:111*g ti;:iinaetilAnA:9'%q0,71,:nnitna76044,1**1,MeeLi4n0P.gazi.nNA Primary Buildings I 35ft I 35 ft I 35ft I 35 ft I 35 ft"°, I 40 ft 0°, 1 55 ft") IL9!:4ii.900:ii*iiigAtilitia!9!..04*i****10"Eiii**PSilth: of the'iti*Ordiifai#:ovidat,i;yealisiatactiltzu Lot Coverage I 25% I 40% I 50% I 50% I 50% I 50% I 50% Open*iie41fili*Jii*0.11410011ffit11001414041°01,14*Fiske WI:1).11friI*.liFabia017.nolaSOtiriP/tPicEriP76,29. Private Open Space(Ground 300/150 sf 225/150 sf 150/100 sf 150/100 sf Floor/Upper Story) _ - ... Open Space(Private and Common) 40% 35% 35% 35% 35% Minimum Patio/Porch Depth 6 ft"1' 6 ft" 6 ft"" 8 ft"" 6 ft" 6 ft" 6 ft"" Miiiirrop,th 9€430fliiMalt,§*j,%;:f.,-*-1:1 ,:ige;CI4VaM;;;Ver`S;;;:°1,tclig?T:nfr:Zt),/ifSk;:::::0-1242.7>A4(4,774::,4 Single-Family I 1,000 sf (attached and detached) , Multi-Family 03, 550 sf Efficiency/Studio Multi-Family 03r 650 sf One Bedroom Multi-Family 800 sf Two Bedroom Multi-Family 03' 950 sf Three or More Bedrooms Distance Between BuildIng/Structure Fronts''."mInImurnh,: 2,.:°.:::::';(,,-.11,,,t4i),-;f,,,:,--4,-,:e,-.:4L/7" r;:s.:7 Between buildings with no patio or - - 30ft - 30 ft 30 ft 30 ft recessed patio Between patio fence/wall less than 5 feet in height - - 15ft 15ft 15 ft 15 ft - Between patio fence/wall more than - - -20 ft 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft 5 feet in height Between balconies above patio - - 20 ft - 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft fence/wall more than 5 feet in heinht ATTACHMENT A P438 Between a patio fence/wall and a building wall — — 20 ft - 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft With common patio fence/wall — — 30 h _ - _ 30 ft 30 ft 30 ft Other Miscellaneous Building Setback Requirements "(minimum) Building to one-story detached 6 ft/15 ft - 15 ft 15 15 Building to wall or curb at project 20 ft - 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft entry Table Notes: (1) On existing lots of record,parcels less than 3 acres or less than the required minimum frontage may only be developed at the lowest end of the permitted density range. (2) Average width,which shall vary accordingly: VL-+/-10 feet L B LM-+/-5 feet (3) Excluding land necessary for secondary streets and arterials and in hillside areas shall be dependent on the slope/capacity factor contained in Chapter 17.52(Hillside Development Standards). (4) Developing multi-family in the LM district and single-family in the M district at the maximum density requires compliance with Standards for Higher Residential Densities as outlined in Subsection 17.36.010.D. (5) Setbacks are measured between the structure and curb face in front yards and corner side yards. Setbacks are measured between the structure and property line in rear yards and interior side yards. (6) Average setback, which shall vary+/_5 feet. (7) Add 10 feet if adjacent to VL,L,or LM district (8) Applies to buildings two stories and taller in height Add 10 more feet for each story over two stories. (9) In hillside areas,heights shall be limited to 30 feet. (10) Limit one story within 100 feet of VL or L district for multiple-family dwellings. (11) Free and clear of obstructions. (12) Senior citizen projects are exempted from this requirement (13) To assure that smaller units are not concentrated in any one area or project,the following percentage limitations of the total number of units shall apply:10%for efficiency/studio and 35%for one bedroom or up to 35%combined.Subject to a Conditional Use Permit,the Planning Commission may authorize a greater ratio of efficiency or one-bedroom units when a development exhibits innovative design qualities and a balanced mix of unit sizes and types. (14) "Front"is defined as the face of the building or unit with the major glass area and/or major recreation area and may include access to that private recreation area. This access mayor may not relate to the primary entrance to the building that faces the street or drive;therefore,some buildings may have more than one front (15) For single-family residential development In the Medium(M)Residential District,these standards shall apply. (16) For multi-family residential development In the Medium(M)Residential District,these standards shall apply. t rir (0 ti N (0 0 I 0 4 T N I I O e O O T 05 C J O T- 0 a mim N O }, c V ., N C ° Z U o r cc E ai %. 0 Pt •0 } 8 W • C D J CCD CO O CD r V ^ c cn Q Q d w O N N CD Q D N U C >, p p c > cd > 0 E > c Q o 2 'et U 0 QD cp > o W U w TD 8 417-771 E z _1 - .-e H _041:1 co) a 'S � ,i 1 '�� �� AO 8� „., �� -'411....-1: 64 ' 41-'..• .I • i 7;*F " '_ ;-� .s. . Q&V1?4T _ ,, ., l :� s ue' ,H � .„ -ti is A.1I. 1 } V -a-- F 1;141., a . A 1 es___ '�..`a� ir *e}mot v i. c' �. i � r—/' � _, cC � „i,l ()#,fir• _ t' ' ter-} , f'`-; si ` Ia- r 7 '.#`" ' � ; �.. ^" , ++ � � �,. � -�' Iry .., :I ., ?) yea r�= . r 0.! --�i io •( w I (`fit 6 11 s ( _ ..++ • •� t ' r. e Ck 1_ L_ • • • Lt i}� ,.. k, IC}� : f� �i d t ' �' '•' 'i r °".✓ I -rr '' Ian. 'Tw 'k'ta✓' °" /}vim r ( i T''. 1 0.Fs(/) ., ��` J. •i d 1 i r i b I.t • 5 ' 1 1 + .. Iffy J� U sl J. ,- „� Y t. !!. 1 1I i4 i `� •�a`C 4� ~+' ,t. ,. t i-, 111 . I`� f I K e.i • -0 4 F r• _ "$ "wz' 2 Ili. �I i 0 #�• e,,I:, » R'71 `e 4/11 1�1� • l I rq a1• . td'7' d� " Imo' B.1 a l ;. @ o 11111111 t r r uiiE' +� a ,fit I 4 b I w y ' I {:.II , . I�t Ns-A.-y (n I ��I Ci i � It ,g^yfi " �l"� ��yy k �r.� 1. h»r VI +!h �i !12I"Lr"55 k r �I f `" t'.Ay„ � W a . 'dl?"t 1 !x -4(dt rgb, �. 6A I yn�*1 z. _ 9 .."z. yr U ' d ' =di! ,81H92t• 7-- .. `11.1 , Fes. r �c 1" ^{ �� 1 i ' 11 ' J 1 } ; ut 1 .y1 4� «. �' x, ., n i ' I_ _ 1; - S)W3A I 38INSN2138 1° t 1 .-----" . ,i, 1 Li il ,g I: .. i ¢ ' ' S 3 .- v 2 A. W ' I ` 4 dNOj+IIbN r.:. _ MAP :j e.*i •. UI 0 t � � 'C co ++j N C 2i r§.J .— (..) i 10 _ iii 6 NatONfX37 t 1...i \, §1-034--c., 0 - - - - NOadico-, --6________ r -".. - , ..— ,.._ .._q• ._,- 0. Or NA J ..„------,,J L en • ______n ____ ....... V ,p.: .. co To. r� E { F ... C ... i 42c g m` �'• 0 . . Q 0t- ..s., a fa7Hpp Q �. 0�3,..._ . __ . • • • ix f.,4 .. di ii NM3N • • _i _ _ �-_' T O7V8fNO21b 0) 0 g mom m .12 c 32 a J ci 1i 1 k- gt a loadi. CU u ` u g 73 11111111. II f---.'-..=_,-•:`:,4.i.,...:•!-i...",.0.,:.:c'-.:,•,_•,....--7,;:,!:,-i... -1F, t 0:1 C t``' {F VNQy1r brN . .... .,. ..firt2,,,,T,,,...1..,‘,..,07. . 7 • NQLQNr72fb�a it 1., . , .,__.(10 • Illira■ .4-1. . i,... iaii S . " 1 41) CL 'rQr 4— W s J ta. F . . . . D NQ.L QNIX37 i' ; ` +NQy1Jeid , C �: n a. rz) , ,J NA. -..:r t. , ' U I .' ... . CO 0 $ck I dr; t3HQp Q.I ,� N M 3N " . _z, I,- T. •: . •' r,.. a7V81H32!V Q Z ry _ +i d� W 41 y Z 2 e r. >, u) u) C U) Cl) Q) L) i !' V CO ti I .CD Co C I + 4 -a + ' U Jr _ - 0 0 -a) i U 0 U 0 cd co w a co � N O U �•C Q c C 4 CO -c "a ai7 aiCC � 0 H0-) 'u)— ww 7E CZ N C a) cc — 2o QC E na) _ CI o '~ `� N o° � 73 NV N N a) c a) c C •i F- NN 1- NN N Q.--7,-, 0 o z U c,494 i } a a a C t O 0) a--A a a M O - o O a) Ii C o +r C co a) O a C o La i• N. co N 0 N C O .a) 0 N 0 a -0 n U— ', a _M a E a) a , 2 0 a) E 3 2 r,,, a) o C0 c� o J o ._ .0 N co = C N .� m • O U `E a C .a 2 a o C ,�, Q 0, }, E Q a U C� C •u) E a) a 'O m a) C Cl) a) 41 rim is : a z4 Fes- o O H N 0 1- 0 x o (ff, 1 ,i a,'1.1.1%,, ,,,,,, i ,.._.J ) ( ,\ , ..,,,, SNa39 I� 3a1HSA/3El ca k- -_- z 3 w g m Q p ■ wr I N 5 �l I 2 , -- VNOLAJ b2/ -- .-- r I vt -,,, , ..... ., ..., , , i':1 I - .\ \ \ .�\ \ NO.L9Nlab A . i I . .giN .\ U C = -a CI 4'4 Of ik \ N ' '.• \ cri NO19NIX37 _ . `\ NA J \ \\\,\�\\` CL I L p o ' ‘e,kk.. i 0)2 RS ... itv " <..-„ix .0 ix a • 0) r-gNOO I'' -� NOJ.M 3N \\,\\j I N.N 07b'9IH38V ' sq) . - . .,..- Er, 1 Q T Ts • FQ- • ..,, ..... . mg e■ x t" .-*- -- - ' ,Acl " :2 a 1 2 _ d..1 ,,,ci .. . R _- o 2 I f C }' N N Q .E E o I W L - � Eo 0 o ° O i? G) @ C O I = 0 E - k= N a) c a) " = -0 c GAO 2 � cs -6w ,_ •- Co - 1y — •� co o E v i O V a--) i (� E cn x ao as o ° _ n � co � C) �, as @ 0o0, re C C co D C �. p vi �. cn o = .1 N cn C C CO CC +- },C c� r E P a� c O Q 4.11) ILM7° c o Co co a) O m 0E _ = (1) a) n C H U 0 -o 1- N o _.4.4e• , i Z • Q 0 • • •Et t:,1 " /' Cd _O 0) N .0 C C) r -o •C i'•' C (s iti C !' U 0 W� s + U so s � 73 Q a) cn so J U LSO ! CD CD 0 O _cz O o co co < W _c - t O O a) u) - O V d. O C 2 -2 4- N O ° as a co cn_ ,-, N c a) a� - Orr °oa ° o caa U OU U) a) CL O c 5 E v) as 5 O n E CD as a C cz 0 7 aai E U O U 0 � O 0 CO Q N a E t a Q ( Cti a) >i = CD E La as 0 a) E a) a) O --� 0 z 4 I— (°n S H o .2 c� a * r' x � � � o • waimpat aiiiiinir if (ti U Ca a--• � CZ -0 � •� a) o /; 22 0 au = c '� c a)4-• 22 Ce 1 i CD� - � O. CI ai NU� ' I n ere > w I cn a ,4_ a - U � N G) O .O O a 0 .w .> cn � � � � _ � 0, if V +� U OUO � �z cti CU � � C� C 'C � O _ O OOO UCQD S. U j � z U N Co C O C D O G) 0 Cu W -0 cic .0) DNN � ccnn C ;`= U � ,— c (� O 4— CnQ (it `�r ( o 2 Q CD-�-- cn CW it *fa , 1 01 1:51 440110=21 "Cc , a) w` W E M a� `V i W T L 0 C co CD IL i. o Oco V _ -0 a o tom - U tan ° Z tkec,ti c� aa a ` k Altgli C4 ca; s A ( Y C a) / E 'r -o = a) L a E c L E Q a o a C) C 2 E a L 0) Q •O c .E C a) N N d CO v 0 0 9 O a 'I Or 14- o 0 CO 0, N •y Co co 0 •- OCO • 0 E . co Z O - V M V w V O C r = N� � = co C •_ > .- O �2 cc f l ll z 2 Q f 10 a ca Z OD Oa • • r, it M r a : r it ^p.,_ - • ill : ' ' ii ..1/111. ! - -.1,1',‘4'-:.,.. / .r it tears WJaY i.- . . lir-' i-.. . j,ii ., I 1 1_vi, i k, .:,:. ., ill y k ; I,«i al ' N II 1;i=� .1 .i voile �.i- A r1 s j- '. -- ,may.■ 1 � _ _. --^ I - _ tip'• ���•••'��� Ya'nona ••vs - ,t: IF J1 g r . 7 { I ,,rte .. 1 - A.ka:k.. :3'7LL .1i4--11. 1 — igton ClI .. . .u. r 16: ' i �'I 1 ` . M I r • } .1 M ,r-t M CI Eilri , .. 1 w.,.ar mss. II o f'• ,w o ViiiaMIN 'i� "{ ti d'b ° �dimi III ''"illipir_ f 1 A r J3 n''''T–T 11 U ' 4. . ' 0- cf• .' .16. 40 .11■11111 IMI_ k 7' T: $ r 9 _ [ IMIIII I.• . ._:, 1, 1 �1 2.• i_Tuvi, C.) ...0 (a Ptaya aI l Ie 8,1 f: • C--'1 ' ,�J Imo.` r' .. •O tJewton PI im{ y .CC -- . 2Ay PiegyPly '* Z V) 9 e. n - I #` Z O - i .��= _ ' r. .. y Q = , mil, i F i 1Z.. a t t rr 3r1N3AV VNOWVd — 1 -1 / . � L{ . . C/1 ml 1 4 \ 114101t, , I .4 I it ill is yy `%• C Ali.it"10 qqqqqg■■1 I A I 11ir. I 4 f 6 ii �� It ' I` i . d1 4 a ,I I{yr ' � [ I . a � j a 1� Tl iii f 999 ilk 1 1YmoC _ . � [. ::5 III' 11111 ii i 1; _ m� R.55 n µ !I 1..!t.. J IR IF e 4 Ic:i � � U �� ft x 14gt . .-1! �fi — Ii . 1 , - 1 1=ail a ", 'T ilk., L. ��o ' , I. % 1 -,, { � {l ) Mill h r 1 ' , ,1 r•4 s : ,i .T__., :i11,61: ti,,i. _____. ,.. , ,, , -_ ,. ik,: i .: , . ,, 11,, ,,_ wir, , n. _ 7 l':.° 'l 1. FR i 1 .z`.. —- i 4.) - . i,,,,,,-.J. ...,4,..., ... ..... r.„ gri, .A0 I i � Mt e �a0 r 0 = '-p',.. 3f1NRAV O- ail-odd m aI U 3 cts f`0 r U 3 � 03 I .:. = Cr 5 .t hi -0 Cr Z N t0 t r V 7 E r O a C J N 2 7 p N CI E _ ID ■. CD z 3 3 '$ a : > - 2 2 U) n 2 a � - 11 UJ • 1<d i. Iiii--- c-3-1 — = Z .-- p w N i p, Z [ iiii c4 O f U U U 111111 Sri c., \ d .1 m O, r CI Mr." N - c0 W N Q 2 U. 0. 2 FW Lia- Tr o al 11114 0 _ o z immillIP M UJ _, 7.-) Z Z C.'3 O LT1 "` N o 3 Z z ■ c� b - z ___.—_ W O N cn crs 0 r 0 w .0 w O r r Z a f- w Z Cra E Q = Q. cc a> I Vk I V♦ J Q Z E = N 0 CO CU E 4 W E O = o 0 z0 = m -0 w W N ^ J o ". X Z m CO (0 W A PSA ❑ r.� C D N- N 0 O o s, _s. J W W p oo O � � w N : v.. 0 Jp a CC m 1O v I— o Lo • a H E CO D (13 : tom, Z 0 E co x •w Q N V U U N ai Z N V O 3 N /, O 4J f. ++ a+ O N Z "q M�y� f9 F L!�/ �_ l7 Y Y Y a ri1 C ",6 C f6 Q 0 0 W LL oe E N 2 CE ott,A4L,:31: C Zr a Z Z O Q = a^b Ple i ' • *'- I 4':..•, , ,%. # - I / / . . I / ,/ / I .t. / / sq f ir i • 1 41 , .. / i i . .... ---.., i.i• :4P•M,I t.,„° ..1,—,.„.1' 1 • / , I f'1:,4.*t'-`.,5.4,42,,,.A 4"..,.%:•‘.4.,,,.,.. 4 1 , I r r s ' ' o# • ..A. ,e,) 1 '',,.;" •4-' r 1.— .4. 7- • 43 , . • .., 14.:t: .4, 111% ,:::,,.;,,,,,, ,,,-;,-, \ e ' '':” 4..,.,.,,,...--.,-.„, a , . q,i,' .1( 1 ,.'4 . -:.;'1,.,..: ''3-. / t- ' 1:r". ''''.(:4,f,,;,,;..... ,:'1: , '' . / :"...'/ .';--ft.;`:'''.' 7''"' ‘; ‘,. ,./ . CO . .... — . EMI. . — ••••,,:i.''. / / Ai.. , '/,..•,.,....41\ ' ,,,!■,. Z ,`,'- -7';'' -\\ No: , r f ., . ,.- / ,,,,7\ • UNI , At' '''k . -'1',/: . % . . ., ,Vi t.ty, kt- it/ UNI i :. /-/ /',, o /r,'if ,,,,,,v --:::„\-,,•,; ,, :',-,'.,,,,,, ,, ,., .. iii i CC ,./.'/ ..• •,,k. •:,,• M 0.. ...• .// , . , • o• -...■ ,. , ■ I .''' 41' lil 0 .L ..,s\ Z (/) .... Z UJ / / ' \t i ■ Z 0 4 .0 . "ta Ct 1 / x 4- , '1‘..C.'' ' 1 i Al. iil 1 ' q Why /..-0* ±;'3. t \ t• ' . .? . '1,. - '''" .•- , . . . , . NIP• . ' ' d1 S ,4100 • .-- iill i ,....■ ' • ik 1 1. . * - , ? / . , I ....All • il ,.._ r I. 7, :t. :ilh a • 0116,, r.;.'III 1 • fp , ;Iiiii ' a "°r " `� �: . � CO -to. iir..1„....,, j Z ' ,r -,: -lair•: W s . t 2 . ...... •• • .. , .. . ,. , . t. . , .. .,••• , •,, W • > ,..•... .1 1 . S r„,-„,/ 1L:. o • ,...! . , . --,q; „ • ...... 2 . .., �� c R. 7• 1W.Y, �� t h� } 4+ �i If 1.• 49 t A • • ♦, \ate •.. . 4.N..-4'.yyy nK • 4.. • -•{ .i A' • S `♦ * l ) / W tw 2 1 ,. . ,.At. > t ''' k-,•., • .-‘ : . . • E, _ +a,: .,.,"....,. .'.._.....1: _._..'.,. 0 OM I , 2 I ..„..,...., . .1.,..c.....,..2„:„....i .0._ , ,, , . . ..... .. . .. ... • . — I ,., . (.., .Z N . , , w ililik'° t i ',i . 4 1 4 ifi r r ' I� id � M1. I. • , \ _ Y • IMIM3 Z W 2 , i VI P • r . .W > . - O ■ a. ' • ,rig 2 :. 4. .. ....., . • J , • t ws \...... • ..,.. . - ..., c, ... ..,, • 0 • , . ., 0 . z (r) . . - w _. . ,_.. . Z . • t • ..4:::;4:7. :: , .A. • P 1i lt, I) Ai Ili :, X r M� _ E � t f { 4 Clid. . .. , .K P z it w 2 , r W S > . 0 CC -ti__,?-- 0 b ,on Om 2 t • ,i . Imirommyr Z u-, c • \ illitott. 4 i . .44 ' - j ti • \ - Li ( . 4 h, .. . r ;4 /4 'if VI .i. • • Y r ...ugh t do J ^, ..:•; fY w` ,•f { Z I . ai • . •J h r ` 1.. pi ti t_� . i r/ 1 ?t *44,4 J, •I f r J o - 70111, x r� i a • J . 0 1 If z 1 a 1 IMMI W • • 0 '�. I 4• . _ Zw Z zo ■ a = g I1 ■ , ,• .1,,, • . , r • 44, W.- I • . .. •. Wi I ' . Min . . '11 10'1 ■ . P." Pc. • f , l• , r le 4.^ ;a ‘4..' , . - •, r 11 • . uteri.,;,_ 3 •:,,,.. t ., ...-'• • -•ir . • ...,R•- -1...41.441-,.,.... , . •-. `• "... • ' .1.....9.e.:3. . *ft .v••"'":36.• .4N .. • . Ve .• . • ) -... • . 0, . '' t: • ',. ' . .1. • ' • • • .1 * E • ..1# . .•- . I 4^ .. . .. ■ • C'1 -• fr i . • Z I. i 1 r ..... sct a . .1 ,.., --, O. . . .k.., . .-....Itil I MIN ., (I) CI) NM .-p-Itt."'• 4 . -4,: MI ) 111 (1 - • ....,... t 4. • 11141C FIL- i . _ -b • ej: SP ■: ;19 .1 al:. , ittin . t L 114 v.y. I -4 Prie ........, • r - -4 I '• q 13 . • ' . , illir Z 4 ,,.t.t. RI < - • --.' -. ••ikid .C. ..l. ..- OP , -,•.11)' - , L w . • ti31, 4 04 4 14 ...lir r Iiiit IIII . 111 .... t-• 41.t r4 tT:4 4 . ... 4, ' I';4•4 ..1 .W..... i ! Di, misits - • += Z <I) -, .111• Lu -II 141 Z Z 0 41 1 * r I P439 ce4 STAFF REPORT RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT LJ RANCHO Date: September 17, 2014 CUCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mike Costello, Fire Chief By: Chris Bopko, Management Analyst III Subject: ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION MAKING DETERMINATIONS REGARDING THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (DIAR LLC, OWNER - APN: 0225-191- 37 - ANNEXATION NO. 88-14-1) LOCATED AT 13351 BANYAN ST INTO AN EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT, CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION AND AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS RECOMMENDATION Consideration of adoption of a resolution making determinations and authorizing the submittal of the levy of special taxes to the qualified electors of territory proposed to be annexed (DIAR LLC, Owner - Annexation No. 88-14-1) to existing Community Facilities District No. 88-1 ("CFD No. 88-1") and calling a special election for such purpose. BACKGROUND Etiwanda Congregation Jehovah's Witness, property owner, has submitted a proposal to develop a church located at 13351 Banyan St (APN 0225-191-37; the "Annexation Area") and is conditioned by the City and Fire District to annex to the existing Community Facilities District (CFD) 88-1 in order to mitigate the development's impact upon fire protection services. On August 20, 2014, the Board initiated formal annexation proceedings pursuant to the provisions of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the "Mello-Roos Act") by adopting Resolution No. FD 14-042 approving an Annexation Map (Exhibit "A") of the territory proposed to be annexed and the Resolution of Intention to Annex APN 0225-191- 37 the existing CFD 88-1. This Resolution, among other things, declared the intention of the Board of Directors to levy a special tax within the Annexation Area to finance fire protection and suppression services and setting a public hearing regarding the proposed annexation to be held on September 17, 2014. Through adoption of this resolution before the Board this evening, the Board will accomplish the following: • Make certain determinations as set forth in the resolution • Call for a special election to be conducted on September 17, 2014 P440 ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION MAKING DETERMINATIONS REGARDING THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (DIAR LLC, OWNER- APN: 0225-191-37 - ANNEXATION NO. 88-14- 1) LOCATED AT 13351 BANYAN ST INTO AN EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT, CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION AND AUTHORIZING SUBMInAL OF LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS SEPTEMBER 17, 2014 PAGE 2 • Authorize submittal of the levy of the special tax to qualified electors of the Annexation Area at such special election ANALYSIS The annexation of the Annexation Area into CFD No. 88-1 will satisfy the conditions of development relating to mitigating impacts upon fire protection services. DIAR LLC, property owner, is in full support of the annexation of the property being annexed. Pursuant to the Mello-Roos Act, whenever there have been less than 12 persons registered to vote within the Annexation Area for each of the 90 days preceding the public hearing pertaining to such annexation, the vote shall be by the landowners within the Annexation Area. Therefore, in the current circumstances, the election will be a landowner's vote, the landowner having one vote per acre or portion thereof of land within the Annexation Area. DIAR LLC, owner of the property within the Annexation Area, has executed a "Consent and Waiver" of time frames relating to the election. Exhibit "A" of the Resolution sets forth the rate and method of apportionment of the special tax proposed to be levied within the Annexation Area which is consistent with the special tax levied upon all territory currently within CFD No. 88-1. At the special election to be held on September 17, 2014, the landowner(s) will be entitled to cast its ballot. The Board Secretary will then canvas the ballot, if received. At the next Board meeting, the Board will consider adopting the resolution declaring the election results and the annexation of the Annexation Area to CFD No. 88-1. If 2/3 of the votes are cast in favor of the levy of the special tax, the Board may declare the property to be annexed. The Public Notice regarding the Public Hearing has been advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin. Respectfully submitted, �— 6)"Alb Mike Costello Fire Chief Attachments 1. Annexation Map 2. Resolution No. FD 14-046 3. CFD No. 88-1 Map • P441 ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION MAKING DETERMINATIONS REGARDING THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (DIAR LLC, OWNER- APN: 0225-191-37 -ANNEXATION NO. 88-14- 1) LOCATED AT 13351 BANYAN ST 1N1.O AN EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT, CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION AND AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS SEPTEMBER 17, 2014 PAGE 3 Exhibit "A" JUNE 2014 SHEET 1 OF t ANNEXATION MAP 88-14-1 OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO 88-1 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO.STATE OF CALIFORNIA • a i BANYAN ST NI 1 M AEMOR PARCEL SUM ER 4425-1.141 II�'u�I� ^l1, /� I ,;'No. Wg% �� E�95G1S 181E 1105 ANNEXATION MM SHALL GOVERN FOR ALL DETAILS AS TO TIE EXTENT OF NNE =OW.T J�J€_ DATE: 7/22/51 TERRITORY ANNEXED TO TIE IBOVE REFERENCEDGCIANNITY FAaUTES DISTRICT MARKS CITY ENGI RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT CERTIFICATION FILED N THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DIE RMICHO CUCAMONGA LEGAL DESCRIPTION: TIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT.CALIFORNIA 11OS_DAY 2014 ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 0225.191-37 ASST.SECRETARY BEING PIN PM 4 MID PAR 2 FM SARI DESCAS SEG MV CCR SO PAR 2 IN RANCHOCUCAMONOA Gm PROTECTION DISTRICT 5 M CEO MAIN CO SECONDS E 24439 FTALG NU SO PAR 2AND 4114 S CO STATE OF CNIFMMA OEO®Awn SECONDS W XESS ri TO SG PAR 4 1N S SP DEG 24 NH 31 SECOTOS W TID01 FT TO SW COR PAO4 TN N W DEO0 MN O SECONDS E I HERESY CERTIFY THAT 1(f x1TNH MAP ROWING SWNOAHfE OF l25 CO FT TN E S9 DEG 24 MIN 30 SECONDS WIICAJ FT TNNW DEO OHM TERRITORY PROPOSED TO DD ANNEXED lO COINIUM NP IY CEN6 315ECOND9C 171.14 FT TO PO! MIT({T IC, as OF TEE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION INSTtCT. COUNTY OF LW EERNANONO, ETAIE OP CAIIFONMA VL0S APPROVED BY 11* BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF SUCH FIRE PROTECOON BER ,RDINO COU R C.R. - AT•REa.MR MEEINq THEREOF. NEW ON THE DAY • E I E OF 2014.DV GS RESOLUTION NO .TNS ANNEXATION WP THIS MAP HAS BEEN FLED UNDER DOCUMENT WINDER_ THE MINDS THE D}RWARY MW FOP COMMUNITY FACEMES DISTRICT NO.X0.1 OAV OF ]%4,AT N IN ROOK—OF IMPS 6 CF THE RANCHO CUCAMONDA FRC PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY OF S AN SERMAAONO STATE OF PRIOR RECORDED ON FSSESSNJN AND CDYMUMIY FACILITIES 01511(015 Al FMG..AT AT EO ECI IMPS M ASSESSMENT AND COMMUWTY THE RCOUEST OF IN THE AMOUNT OF II FACILITIES DSIRTCTS.AT PAGE IN THE OFFICE CF THE CORITY RECORDER FOR THE CCNIY OF SFr BERNARCNO. CMIFORNA °ENNIS DRAWER ASSESSONRCCORDER.CtERR COUNTY OF SAN RERNNARDINO STATE OF CAUFORNIA ASST.SECRETARY RANCHO CUCAMD4DATIRE PROTECTION DORIC! Sr STATE OFCALIFORIM. DEPUTY RECORDER P442 RESOLUTION NO. FD 14-046 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS REGARDING THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (ANNEXATION NO. 88-14-1) TO AN EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT (CFD 88-1) AND CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION AND AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF SUCH TERRITORY WHEREAS,the BOARD OF DIRECTORS(the"Board of Directors")of the RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT(the"Fire Protection District"), RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA, has previously declared its intention and held and conducted proceedings relating to the annexation of territory to an existing community facilities district pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982",being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, and specifically Article 3.5 thereof (the "Act"). The existing Community Facilities District has been designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 (the "District"); and, WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing relating to the annexation of territory to the District,the extent of the territory to be annexed (the"Annexation Area"),the furnishing of certain public services and all other related matters has been given; and, WHEREAS, it has now been determined that written protests have not been received by 50% or more of the registered voters residing either within the Annexation Area or the District and/or property owners representing more than one-half(1/2)or more of the area of land within the Annexed Area or within District; and, WHEREAS,inasmuch as there have been less than twelve(12)persons registered to vote within the Annexation Area for each of the 90 preceding days, this legislative body desires to submit the levy of the required special tax to the landowners of the Annexation Area, said landowners being the qualified electors as authorized by law. NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. RECITALS The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. DETERMINATIONS It is determined by this Board of Directors that: A. all proceedings prior hereto were valid and taken in conformity with the requirements of law, and specifically the provisions of the Act; B. less than twelve (12) registered voters have resided within the Annexation Area for each of the ninety(90)days preceding the close of the public hearing and, consequently, the qualified electors shall be the landowners of the Annexation Area and each landowner who is the owner of record as of the close of the public hearing, or the authorized representative thereof, shall have one vote for each acre or portion of an acre of land that she or he owns within the Annexation Area; P443 C. the time limit specified by the Act for conducting an election to submit the levy of the special taxes to the qualified electors of the Annexation Area and the requirements for impartial analysis and ballot arguments have been waived with the unanimous consent of the qualified electors of the Annexation Area; D. the Secretary, acting as the election official, has consented to conducting any required election on a date which is less than 125 days following the adoption of this resolution; and E. the public services proposed to be financed from the proceeds of special taxes to be levied within the Annexation Area are necessary to meet increased demands placed upon the Fire Protection District as a result of development and/or rehabilitation occurring in the Annexation Area. SECTION 3. BOUNDARIES OF ANNEXED AREA The boundaries and parcels of land in the Annexation Area and on which special taxes are proposed to be levied in order to pay the costs and expenses for the public services described in Section 4 below are generally described as follows: All that property and territory proposed to be annexed to the District, as said property is shown on a map as previously approved by this legislative body, said map entitled "Annexation Map No. 88-14-1 of Community Facilities District No. 88-1 of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, County Of San Bernardino, State Of California" (the "Annexation Map"), a copy of which is on file in the Office of the Secretary and shall remain open for public inspection. SECTION 4. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES The services that are authorized to be financed from the proceeds of special taxes levied within the District are certain services which are in addition to those services required for the territory within the District and will not be replacing services already available. A general description of the services authorized to be financed by the District is as follows: The performance by employees of functions, operations, maintenance and repair activities in order to provide fire protection and suppression services. The District shall finance all direct, administrative and incidental annual costs and expenses necessary to provide such services. The same types of services which are authorized to be financed by the District from the proceeds of special taxes levied within the District are the types of services proposed to be financed from the special taxes proposed to be levied within the Annexation Area. If and to the extent possible such services shall be provided in common with District and the Annexation Area. SECTION 5. SPECIAL TAX Except where funds are otherwise available and subject to the approval of the qualified electors of the Annexation Area, a special tax sufficient to pay for the services described in Section 4 that are required for the Annexation Area, secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all non-exempt real property in the Annexation Area will be levied annually within the boundaries of the Annexation Area. For particulars as to the rate and method of apportionment of the proposed special tax, reference is made to the attached and incorporated Exhibit"A" which sets forth in sufficient detail the method of apportionment to allow each landowner or resident within the Annexation Area to clearly estimate the maximum amount of the special tax that such person will have to pay. The special taxes shall be collected in the same manner as ad valorem property taxes and shall be subject to the same penalties, procedure, sale and lien priority in any case of delinquency, as applicable for ad valorem taxes; however, as applicable,this Board of Directors may, by resolution,establish and adopt an Resolution No. FD 14-046 - Page 2 of 7 P444 alternate or supplemental procedure as necessary. Any special taxes that may not be collected on the County tax roll shall be collected through a direct billing procedure by the Treasurer of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, acting for and on behalf of the District. SECTION 6. SPECIAL TAX ACCOUNTABILITY MEASURES Pursuant to and in compliance with the provisions of Government Code Section 50075.1, this Board of Directors hereby establishes the following accountability measures pertaining to the levy by the District of the special taxes within the Annexation Area as described in Section 5 above: A. Each such special tax shall be levied for the specific purposes section in Section 5. above. B. The proceeds of the levy of each such special tax shall be applied only to the specific applicable purposes set forth in Section 5. above. C. The District shall establish a separate account into which the proceeds of the special taxes levied within the District shall be deposited. D. The Fire Chief or his or her designee, acting for and on behalf of the District, shall annually file a report with the Board of Directors as required pursuant to Government Code Section 50075.3. SECTION 7. ELECTION The proposition related to the levy of the special tax shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the Annexation Area, said electors being the landowners, with each landowner having one (1) vote for each acre or portion thereof of land which he or she owns within said annexed territory. The special election shall be held on the 17th of September 2014, and said election shall be a special election to be conducted by the Secretary(hereinafter"Election Official"). If the proposition for the levy of the special tax receives the approval of more than two-thirds (2/3) of the votes cast on the proposition,the special tax may be levied as provided for in this Resolution and the Board of Directors may determine that the Annexation Area is added to and part of the District. SECTION 8. BALLOT The ballot proposal to be submitted to the qualified voters at the election shall generally be as follows: PROPOSITION A RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1, AUTHORIZATION FOR SPECIAL TAX LEVY Shall Community Facilities District No. 88-1 of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District be authorized to levy special taxes within the territory shown on"Annexation Map No. 88-14-1 of Community Facilities District No. 88-1 of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, County Of San Bernardino, State Of California" (the"Annexation Map")pursuant to the rate and method of apportionment of special taxes (the"Special Tax Formula")set forth in Resolution No. FD 14-030 to finance fire suppression and protection services and administrative expenses? SECTION 9. VOTE The appropriate mark placed in the voting square after the word"YES"shall be counted in favor of the adoption of the proposition, and the appropriate mark placed in the voting square after the word "NO" in the manner as authorized, shall be counted against the adoption of said proposition. Resolution No. FD 14-046 - Page 3 of 7 P445 SECTION 10. ELECTION PROCEDURE The Election Official is hereby authorized to take any and all steps necessary for the holding of said election. Said Election Official shall perform and render all services and proceedings incidental to and connected with the conduct of said election, and said services shall include, but not be limited to the following: A. Prepare and furnish to the election officers necessary election supplies for the conduct of the election. B. Cause to be printed the requisite number of official ballots,tally sheets and other necessary forms. C. Furnish and address official ballots for the qualified electors of the Annexation Area. D. Cause the official ballots to be mailed and/or delivered, as required by law. E. Receive the returns of the election. F. Sort and assemble the election material and supplies in preparation for the canvassing of the returns. G. Canvass the returns of the election. H. Furnish a tabulation of the number of votes given in the election. Make all arrangements and take the necessary steps to pay all costs of the election incurred as a result of services performed for the District and pay costs and expenses of all election officials. J. Conduct and handle all other matters relating to the proceedings and conduct of the election in the manner and form as required by law. Resolution No. FD 14-046 - Page 4 of 7 P446 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2014. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a Regular Meeting of said Board held on the_day of 2014. Executed this _ day of 2014 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary Resolution No. FD 14-046 - Page 5 of 7 P447 EXHIBIT "A" RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 • SPECIAL TAX LEVY FISCAL YEAR 2014/15 TAXING SPECIAL TAX LEVY TAXING CLASSIFICATION FISCAL YEAR 2014/15 1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY A. Residential Class I $463.24 (more than 3590 SF) B. Residential Class II $356.94 (3077 to 3589 SF) C. Residential Class III $284.09 (2564 to 3076 SF) D. Residential Class IV $248.26 (2308 to 2563 SF) E. Residential Class V $214.97 (2051 to 2307 SF) F. Residential Class VI $195.79 (1795 to 2050 SF) G. Residential Class VII $176.58 (less than 1795 SF) Commercial/Industrial Property $712.77 per acre or$0.064 per sq.ft. or bldg. area, whichever is greater 2. APPROVED PROPERTY $200.00 per lot or parcel 3. VACANT PROPERTY $10.00 per acre SF = Square Feet Resolution No. FD 14-046 - Page 6 of 7 P448 1 40) in C.) . 11) E 05 +0 = O o v C U U o = 0 \ .1I\ ar \,44,41 AvAneyo d cif' g No'i. ...i !Lcg. • ¢C =L IC C g LL. Ay ise3` ! = -OA v iga • .110.4 AV epueM! silliniv - _ so hi, - EMI.% Ay Jape t4008 NO P 0, _....._. L.--- . . Ay ua,l!II!W , . Ay uaAtH • r _ Ay esounek Ay Pleq!IPJv r Ay uewlleH a S v Ay pieAaun 4s c° cc �p �Y % . ,71i ab1 C s�c!a g a g ab Y r L_.._.,,... �.. ..�`� m L 0 CO s i) a u_Oo < 14011 F€k tic g itl � a N m tllgaG (.:4%.x= Aga .$ it'g`e PaskirKl Resolution No. FD 14-046 - Page 7 of 7 p449 STAFF REPORT k y t CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE L-11-60 RANCHO Date: September 17, 2014 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John Gillison, City Manager From: Fabian Villenas, Principal Management Analyst Subject: Approval for Mayor to sign letter advocating for enhanced preservation and management of Cucamonga Canyon, including the inclusion of Cucamonga Canyon into the San Gabriel National Monument, and encouraging the U.S. Forest Service to conduct additional public outreach in the San Bernardino County area RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the Mayor to sign a letter (Attachment A) advocating for enhanced preservation and management of Cucamonga Canyon, including the potential inclusion of Cucamonga Canyon into a possible San Gabriel Mountains National Monument, and strongly encouraging the U.S. Forest Service to conduct additional public outreach concerning the national monument designation in the San Bernardino County area before taking any further actions. BACKGROUND Cucamonga Canyon is located in the San Gabriel Mountain foothills directly above the City of Rancho Cucamonga and within the San Bernardino National Forest. The canyon, with its beautiful waterfalls and scenic pools and streams, has historically attracted thousands of visitors each year, having a detrimental effect on the Canyon as well as the residential neighborhood adjacent to it. The large number of visitors that access Cucamonga Canyon on a daily basis has also impacted public safety and has led to an increase in emergency rescue incidents; 23 emergency rescues and one fatality since January 2012. Due to these public safety concerns, the U.S. Forest Service instituted a temporary closure of the Canyon last year. In 2003, Congress approved the San Gabriel River Watershed Study Act which authorized the Secretary of Interior to study the San Gabriel Mountains and the San Gabriel River and its potential for special federal designation. In April 2013, the National Park Service released the San Gabriel Watershed and Mountains Special Resource Study, which recommended the designation of a National Recreation Area (NRA) for the San Gabriel Mountains and foothills, the San Gabriel and Rio Hondo river corridors and Puente Hills. The NRA designation would provide opportunities for enhanced resources and management in order to protect and restore these natural areas, provide meaningful recreational opportunities, and improve public safety. The portion of the San Gabriel Mountains recommended in the study for the NRA designation extended from the Pasadena/Alta Dena area on the west to San Antonio Heights above Upland to the east, falling short of including Cucamonga Canyon by just a couple of miles. In September 2013, the City Council took action to support advocating for the inclusion of Cucamonga Canyon P450 AI'I'ROVAI.FOR MAY012TO SIGN LEITE.R ADVOCATING FOR ENHANCED PRESERVATION AND PAGE 2 \IANAGE\1EN'1'OF CUCAMONGA CANYON, INCLUDING'HIE INCLUSION OF CUCAMONGA CANYON INTO THE SAN GABRIEL NATIONAL MONUMENT,AND ENCOURAGING THE U.S. FOREST SERVICE TO CONDUCT ADDITIONAL.PUB SEPI'LAn3ER 17,2014 into the proposed NRA. The 2014 Legislative Platform included two items related to Cucamonga Canyon: • Support legislative efforts to create a San Gabriel Mountains National Recreation Area with the inclusion of Cucamonga Canyon. • Support efforts to attract federal resources to assist with the management of Cucamonga Canyon. In June 2014, Congresswoman Judy Chu (27th District) introduced H.R. 4858, the San Gabriel National Recreation Area Act which would create a National Recreation Area for the Angeles National Forest and San Bernardino National Forest west of the Cajon Pass, the San Gabriel Mountain foothills, and the San Gabriel River corridor. City staff worked closely with Congresswoman Chu's office in order to ensure that Cucamonga Canyon was included as part of the proposed NRA designation. According to information from Congresswoman Judy Chu's office, any progress on the NRA legislation could take many years, if at all, to move through Congress. Consequently, Congresswoman Chu called on the President last month to establish a San Gabriel Mountains National Monument though the Antiquities Act. Under the Antiquities Act passed by Congress in 1906, the President has the authority to designate a national monument by Executive Order to protect areas of federal land only that are of historic, natural or scientific significance. Last month, city officials along with representatives from San Bernardino County, SANBAG, the Sheriff's Department, and other agencies met with Department of Agriculture and Forest Service officials in order to discuss the possible national monument designation and what it would mean. A large public meeting held in Baldwin Park on August 26th , at which Supervisor Rutherford was one of the guest speakers, was also attended by Rancho Cucamonga officials. SAN GABRIEL NATIONAL MONUMENT The national monument designation appears to be relatively similar in many regards to a national recreation area. According to the available public information, the proposed San Gabriel National Monument would continue the same goals that Congresswoman Chu's NRA legislation embodied — conservation, enhanced long-term management, and meaningful recreational opportunities. One notable distinction is that unlike the NRA designation, which involves the National Park Service, the National Monument designation would require the United States Forest Service to continue managing the affected federal lands, albeit at an enhanced planning level from what is presently done. According to information provided by Congresswoman Chu's office, both designations are intended to uphold and protect water rights, property rights, and land use rights. The City's support is contingent on these protections. Another notable difference between the two is that the national monument would only include existing federal lands, while the NRA potentially included lands outside of the national forests. As noted above, with a national monument designation, the San Gabriel Mountains within the existing National Forest boundaries would continue to be managed by the U.S. Forest Service. The national monument status, however, would help increase the priority of the area within the Forest Service and bring access to potentially improved resources and better management, both of which are critical items for the restoration of Cucamonga Canyon (which lies primarily, including specifically the falls, on federal lands). The elevated status would also potentially allow for • P451 APPROVAL.FOR MAYOR"I-O SIGN LE FI'ILII ADVOCATING FOR ENHANCED PRESERVATION AND PAGE 3 MANAGEMENT 017 CUCAJIONGA CANYON, INCLUDING THE INCLUSION OF CUCANONGA CANYON INFO THE SAN GABRIEI.NATIONAL.MONUDIEN'I',AND ENCOURAGING'L'I-IF U.S. FOREST SERVICE TO CONDUCT ADDITIONAL PUB SEPTEMBER 17,2014 opportunities for fund raising through public-private partnerships, applying for additional public and private grants, and support from various foundations. A FAQs sheet on the San Gabriel Mountains National Monument prepared by Congresswoman Chu's office is included as Attachment B. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA POSITION LETTER The attached draft position letter for the City Council's consideration restates the City's position that it supports efforts for improving the management of and enhancing critical resources to protect Cucamonga Canyon in order to provide a safe experience for visitors to enjoy the canyon's natural beauty. With these goals in mind and with the understanding that the national monument designation would provide greater prioritization within the U.S. Forest Service, the City supports the national monument designation for the immediate area of Cucamonga Canyon only. The letter also restates that any designation must protect local water rights, property rights, local land use control, and transportation needs. It also strongly encourages the U.S. Forest Service to conduct a more robust public outreach effort in San Bernardino County, before moving forward with any declaration for additional areas within San Bernardino County. CONCLUSION With the City Council's authorization, a letter with the Mayor's signature will be sent to the U.S. Forest Service advocating for enhanced preservation and management of Cucamonga Canyon, supporting the inclusion of Cucamonga Canyon, as a non-contiguous area, into the San Gabriel National Monument, and strongly encouraging the U.S. Forest Service to conduct additional public outreach in the San Bernardino County area before moving forward with any declaration for additional areas within San Bernardino County. Respectfully Submitted, Fabian A. Villenas Principal Management Analyst Attachments: - Sample Position Letter - National Forest Service Boundaries Map - FAQs Mayor L. DENNIS MICHAEL•Mayor Pro Ton SAM SPAGliA!p,}¢^ Council Members WILLIAM J. ALEXANDER, MARC STEINORTH, DIANE WILLI 2 City Manager JOHN R.GILLISON L� THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 17, 2014 Robert Bonnie Under Secretary for Natural Resources and Environment U.S. Department of Agriculture 1400 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, DC 20250 RE: SAN GABRIEL MOUNTAINS NATIONAL MONUMENT Dear Mr. Bonnie: The City of Rancho Cucamonga appreciates your leadership in moving the bar ahead for greater preservation and recreation efforts in the San Gabriel Mountains. Since early in the legislative process, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has worked closely with Congresswoman Judy Chu's office to include Cucamonga Canyon in the San Gabriel National Recreation Area (NRA) legislation. Cucamonga Canyon is located in the western region of the San Bernardino National Forest and attracts thousands of visitors each year from throughout Southern California. The magnitude of visitors and their destructive activities have had catastrophic impacts on the canyon. The canyon walls and rocks are covered in graffiti and trash is littered along the trails and streams. There have been dozens of emergency rescues and one fatality in the canyon since 2012. As a temporary solution, the U.S. Forest Service has closed the canyon due to public safety concerns; however, a long-term management plan is needed to preserve the canyon for safe recreational purposes. It was our hope that Congresswoman Chu's legislation would provide opportunities for enhanced management of the Canyon through a coordinated Management Plan, as well as the opportunity to potentially receive additional resources. The City of Rancho Cucamonga supports improving the Forest Service management and stewardship of the natural resources which are part of the San Gabriel Mountains, and include the area known as Cucamonga Canyon. This has been our goal for many years as we seek to protect Cucamonga Canyon and provide a safe experience for visitors to enjoy the canyon's natural beauty. If there is a mechanism to achieve this goal without being part of a national monument we would support that process, and we are also supportive of a national monument status for the immediate Cucamonga Canyon area based on our understanding that the national monument designation will provide enhanced prioritization within the U.S. Forest Service and the potential for additional resources to restore Cucamonga Canyon. Underlying our position is our community's full support to: • Preserve all existing and historic water rights including rights related to conveyance and flow of water. • Create a local governance model to oversee the management of the canyon with fair representation from San Bernardino County. • Protect property rights for local governments, businesses, and private citizens who own property in or near the national monument boundaries. • Retain local government's land use authority for lands under their existing jurisdiction. • Ensure that the ability to meet transportation needs and develop future infrastructure needs is unimpeded. 10500 Civic Centcr Dr. •P.O.Box 807•Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91729-0807•lel(909)477-2700•Fax(909)477-2849•www.CityofRC.us P453 At the same time, we want to make it clear that while our community has had a lengthy discussion regarding Cucamonga Canyon, other communities in San Bernardino County have not had the same opportunity and have many unanswered, and important questions, regarding national monument status for the San Gabriel Mountains. We support their desire for additional public outreach and education in San Bernardino County, along with feedback from residents and local stakeholder groups, before any designation of national monument status for other areas located in San Bernardino County is even considered. If additional public outreach cannot be achieved within the consideration period for the national monument, we do not see the need to include any other portions of land in San Bernardino County outside of Cucamonga Canyon in the national monument designation. If you have any questions please contact Fabian Villenas at (909) 477- 2700, ext. 2006 or Fabian.Villenas@CityofRC.us. Sincerely, L. Dennis Michael Mayor 10500 Civic Center Dr. • P.O. Box 807• Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91729-0807•Tel (909)477-2700• Fax(909)477-2849•www.CiryofRC.us -- 1 i ` P454• Q ; lb I I it E \ . • 0 Cc7s m C o - o 0 ` o E _ C9 `.41. m° u LL }— d 0 o s azw Q ..d v v r f ,.. -‘ I• _-T r. 15 - . .._\ !_ � � I f- H . _( • I _1 =_J�, 1.._ .1 i _ -- 1 I J • P455 / r----, , , , ii +,0 z - N ; • 1,.. ., 4.2 < /1 ,) C P a) E = c z fl/ •,-: c ni o 7.,... . -.-• 2 ; . 2 ---; 0 '2 co o \-----7. I c I: ini, . . 2 ,,, 13 5,' Tg `„E cu g 0 0 Q. - 2 00 201 1/4. ..._ : • CL 1 / .., C_____ \.......--4 -.\•. '.. ". 1., . . . f \„e„...., . i , .Ar.•■••■•.-:_. . . \ ■ I ' ' ..\\'' • ss.-d.1%, . N 10 ANA . \ s • A ..i. 'I ... \ • • . . Is - ‘ a P456 San Gabriel Mountains National Monument Frequently Asked Questions Potential San Gabriel Mountains National Monument: Why do the San Gabriel Mountains need additional protection? The San Gabriel Mountains attract over 3 million visitors a year.What many people don't realize is just how much strain this area is under to keep up with the growing demand for outdoor space and recreation. The Los Angeles area is one of the most park poor regions of the country. As a result,the mountains are one of few places Angelenos can enjoy the outdoors, but they are under immense stress from overuse. There is persistent trash,graffiti, safety hazards, and few visitor facilities and services in the Mountains.These conditions increase fire dangers, decrease water quality, and threaten the diverse ecology and other features that make these mountains unique in the world. How did the idea for a national monument come about? The need for a national monument designation is an extension of ongoing conversations over the past decade on how to protect, preserve, and enhance the San Gabriel Mountains.The many public meetings,town halls, and stakeholder roundtables over the last ten years have laid the foundation for today's effort to achieve a national monument. For over a decade, constituents and stakeholders in the Los Angeles area have called for increased protection of local natural resources, as well as greater community engagement with the outdoors.The National Park Service (NPS)conducted a Special Resource Study over a ten year period and recommended additional protections for the Mountains as a National Recreation Area (NRA). Rep. Chu then introduced H.R.4858,the San Gabriel National Recreation Area Act. However, residents continue to demand tangible change. In response, Rep. Chu reached out to President Obama to help make the community's priorities a reality at long last. What is a national monument and how is it different from a National Recreation Area (NRA)? A national monument is very similar to a national recreation area. Under the Antiquities Act,the President has the authority to designate a national monument to protect objects that are of historic or scientific significance. Both designations uphold and protect water rights, property rights, land use rights, etc. Both enhance conservation and improve management of areas with special ecological, cultural, historic, and recreational value through more resources, education, and public engagement. Both allow a wide range of recreational activities. The primary difference between a national monument and an NRA is that a national monument only includes federal lands. It would NOT include any state, city, or private property. In this case,the boundaries are limited to the Angeles and San Bernardino National Forests. What does the San Gabriel National Recreation Area Act do and how does it protect my rights? The San Gabriel National Recreation Area Act(H.R.4858)that Rep. Chu introduced in 2014 establishes an NRA as a unit of NPS including the San Gabriel Mountains, Emerald Necklace river corridor, and Puente Hills.This allows NPS to contribute resources and bring together partners at the State, county and local level to pursue community-based projects in a coordinated and comprehensive manner. NPS would help address trash,graffiti, poor signage,fire safety and water quality by improving visitor services, staffing, and facilities in the Mountains. It would help cities create more opportunities for recreation within their neighborhoods,and establish environmental education programs and volunteer and work programs for minorities,youth, and veterans. 1 P457 The legislation was crafted in collaboration with local communities and stakeholders, including water, utilities, residents, and elected officials. As a direct result of the feedback she received from her public outreach, Rep. Chu drafted legislation for the NRA that ensures a continuation of property rights, local land control, water rights, fire management and several other priorities. Key features of the legislation include: • Protection of water right, private property, land use, and existing laws, ordinances, permits, plans, regulations, rights of way, and preservation of all existing jurisdictions and authorities; • A Public Advisory Council and a Management Partnership comprised of a majority of local officials; • An opt-out clause for cities. Where can I find a copy of the NPS Special Resource Study and a copy of the NRA legislation? N PS Study: http://www,nps.gov/pwro/sangabriel/ H.R. 4858: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-113hr4858ih/pdf/BILLS-113hr4858ih.pdf If Rep.Chu introduced NRA legislation why do we need a monument protect the mountains? For over a decade we have been on an unsustainable trajectory. Persistent trash,graffiti, and safety issues increase fire dangers, decrease water quality, and threaten the ecology and unique habitats of the mountains. We need increased resources and better management to make sure people can still enjoy this open space while also maintaining it better. We also need more community engagement in the urban corridor. The NRA legislation is a first step in achieving stronger protections and more resources for the region. However, with a divided Congress and a weak record of passing conservation bills, it will likely be several years before progress is made on passing this legislation.A monument can bring about tangible improvements sooner. What are the benefits of a national monument? The benefits of a national monument are very similar to the NRA, because the needs of the region are the same. A San Gabriel Mountains National Monument would help prioritize the area within the U.S. Forest Service and bring with it the resources needed to provide our families with sustainable recreation so that people can enjoy the mountains now and preserve them for generations to come. A national monument will protect water quality by applying more resources toward preventing trash and pollution in and along the rivers. A national monument will also have a positive economic effect. Numerous studies have shown that recreational spaces increase property value and increase revenues for local businesses as well as cities. A national monument can create opportunities for urban families,youth,veterans, and minorities to enjoy outdoor activity and learn about nature and the history and ecology of the mountains. They will learn how to preserve and protect the environment, and participate in empowering work and volunteer opportunities. Under a monument designation, where will the funding come from for improvements? Ultimately, budgets are about priorities and a national monument status would allow the Forest Service to permanently prioritize our region when allocating resources.The U.S. Forest Service has long operated with a tight budget and as a result the agency continually has to shift resources around to meet all its responsibilities. If the Angeles and San Bernardino Forests are elevated to the status of a national monument the U.S. Forest Service would be able to raise funds through private-public partnerships, apply for grants, and potentially increase support from foundations. Already there are organizations willing to contribute funds for conservation 2 P458 and recreation but currently the U.S. Forest Service has no way to prioritize these funds and direct them specifically to the San Gabriel Mountains. A monument would change this. How will water and property rights be protected under a national monument? Monument designations only apply to federal lands, not state, local, or private lands. They do not affect state, local, or private property in and around the monument boundaries.The do not create additional land use or regulatory authorities.They do not create new water rights or alter existing ones.They do not affect existing uses of the area. Additionally, Rep. Chu has asked the Administration to use the language of the NRA legislation, crafted with extensive local input, as a foundation for a national monument proclamation. This would preserve exiting water and property rights. Most recent monument proclamations have used existing legislation as a starting point, and it is STANDARD for water and property rights to be explicitly protected in monument designations. For example, the proclamation for Chimney Rock National Monument explicitly states that, "Nothing in this proclamation shall be construed to alter the valid existing water rights of any party, including the United States." What will the boundaries of the monument be?Who will manage the area?Will there be local control? National monuments can only be declared on existing federal lands.A potential San Gabriel Mountains National Monument will be limited to U.S. Forest Service land,following the forest boundaries. The U.S. Forest Service will manage the monument. U.S. Forest Service map:_ 4:.ii 44,Proposed San Gabriel Mountains National Monument it.. s "il %... 1- C.'"' . , b141, • ♦4 J •1 � Y .....44rt .. ~....Jr« ....a �''�.... _J r.. .. •1...ar rw. .. �._�. t- ... ... _ . _". IF 04- T '} ' lrM•aY .q.t.... _ _ ! .L. ,...4 SW _ .......4.% •N�Y...r _ t.y..t, p.ar.•..UM.r...—' ,.Jii...I. b. t.. i .yr» )-- -. ."4""' I- 1.....w p.. • 1 ....w•.—P...u•.rrrl p,...wa.. .wv�w r w♦. i..ra •r•.a.......t..,9.NS L..r.. �l� r ...,4..h. ..'1... ' t•.1....tM oars.M.•w.1.w....a 1.tWaa -._ -.4. . .r• f.UM w.. ..r fr •• ..."...""1'. . "rat.a.I..W1 4"j. - (+: Y.V. I.w.rtllwl Wr♦wwr t I.IM.. i.9.,......matt ..41141 .1+.M.N. At present, local communities have no direct input in the Management Plan of the Angles and San Bernardino National Forests. Rep. Chu wants to ensure that more public input is included in the process. She has asked that the Administration create a Public Advisory Council, like the one described in her NRA bill,to help manage the 3 P459 monument and ensure local control.The recently established San Juan National Monument, in Washington State, created a similar Public Advisory Council at the request of the states'congressional representatives. If I live in the mountains or would like to hike,hunt,fish,cycle,run marathons,ride off-highway vehicles in the mountains,will I be able to continue to do so? Yes.These are kinds of activities that a national monument—like an NRA—is designed to preserve.With increased resources and public education,these activities would even be enhanced as the mountains are better managed, cleaner, and safer. Monument designations do not affect existing uses of the area. Will there be opportunities for public comment before a monument is declared? Yes.The U.S. Forest Service held a public town hall on August 26th, and has been holding stakeholder meetings. This is an ongoing process and the U.S. Forest Service intends to reach out to as many stakeholders and communities as possible. Rep.Chu is encouraging these meetings and will continue to advocate that the U.S. Forest Service conduct ample outreach.The Obama Administration has a strong record of being highly responsive to local communities in crafting new national monuments. If you have not been contacted and would like to participate, please let Rep. Chu know! Side-By-Side Comparison: National Rec Area National Monument Who will establish it? Congress The President What will it do? Protect areas with special ecological, Protect areas with special ecological, cultural, historic, and recreational cultural, historic, and recreational value, and enhances recreational value, and enhances recreational opportunities through education and opportunities through education better management. and better management. Which Federal Agency The National Park Service and U.S. The U.S. Forest Service is Involved? Forest Service What will the Federal and non-federal lands:The Federal lands ONLY:The Angeles boundaries be? Angeles National Forest,the Emerald National Forest and potentially the Necklace, and the Puente-Chino Hills. San Bernardino National Forest. What are the main More resources and greater More resources and greater benefits? community engagement. community engagement. How will it increase Budget line item. Budget prioritization, access to grant resources? funding, and public-private partnerships. How long will it take to Potentially many years. Potentially much sooner than the see these benefits? NRA. 4 wy— 6 tim, � U I as) Cl) l ,. ■■ C C E t. M S 1: - 2 0 i. ,. ..... 2 0) ,' i co L a .MEI } t3 cis Z o z C 41rflii,; Q U ;jf`� Q ro m �� •c c a) n .0 m Z c c v c c cC m o O u) o, E N -c N m C o C C O m .� co Q CO N 7 -C O N U X O 2 U a) C O CO _0 C W o e 3 C ed (3 N N O c ` m E I co o O w co N N y U N — flU O o N D N C U Z a C M ■� _ U rd N mom C c6 N (1\ 7F000 y W O N (6 ro co E UE � c -o cts 00Ea, �_ Eo ° I -o m a.) . . _. ., u., •� N U Z t/�1 U N N Ur) w a a n G m a a 0 N UJ -0 O) C = O c Q 7 U O O c 2 O N N N co Er N N Q > T O- O M CI c670 � o Co N.0 'O N CO (6 N A d y 7 CD C N C IUC al i Ila ¢ x o ' 4, . z5 0 nilr ! U O '°° ._ — N CD v . : C E = C C O 0C U y E `F ■_ _ C U) cB E C w O 0 c c . aJ les +, H C co L C O N E E CJ CO C 0 C 0 C M o 2 c _ f6 o cy, 4 O O t 0 `. � :i---• V iJ QJ -a z Ewa Q =p L-N C c6 p N N^W U a O L } v v C O -o v !(7)an CU i x'�udam4 I¢y1 V V) :1 *! ( , N OU \ }P v 0 O i C tio cu– 4A E co._ f6 ■� U N U C �- 0 CID c /�\ c C fB QJ Vr C c� j V) to.Cli 0 s._ v) a"' 0 4 }� s- 0 O � a-+ O L N N ik. U a--0 �- C. — ca C I C) O c 11-3 ate--+ N C E •N +_, U L 0 7, 0 U 4—; a. o C = ON 0 i 0 (6 >- N f6 a + U C N (� O +' LE I . N O 0 o N CO i N N U CC i N , ■ C N Q Cti 'L C d v ° o C (U N 'V w — i— (6 O c/) O Q Q ■� C W N +' �, 00 -C N N MO f0 Za w > > _ (v m a • • • • 1 ",,...**40 a U L °' c c m � \{ c u 0 E > o-"+� U _cc Y 'Y Y Qf N L w L C C C Y a) a 4t N O CV al CO bo Y a aJ - u U k. O y _ 'o c O O t O 11:1 a C p a L c O L Q a LL O ` Cl) co 1 y V J C c p�q + > co O > Y N a L > O Y Y to N c ro .■ , YL.. V1 J > O 2 41 VI 41 Z ) cu s to VI CU p ar ar u to to m Y 'c O O O >- O c a• 'O N (.3 0 0 0 v N A 'O ',fig a c Q u to ro to " O CO c i O +� 4- d a aJ O aJ aJ u l.L aJ O C CU 0 6Op Y c Y 0) C C C L O O aJ a1 N v m aJ O O 7 co m H a ill s- i cu D Il Z m c u c0 to a E _I -0 L Y bq c -O c u O 0 ..; O N L V- t aJ = ro L }' N c E O p _ o : al E CO W C Y Tot O aJ '� _ 4,71,- L tt Y a L C N :1- U y to of m „.5.- a1 V O C aJ o Y > LL aJ C 3, }' 7 a aJ c c d Lo tt • Y a N O vJ J > O C i u c 0 '3 ` aJ Y ■ v u c MI CO c c d i C O .. C t C • m m a _ O O p Al c aJ vt c — t. p N Y .tA Y Y .9 f0 V) fa Q) N a) 7 ti, Gp N O to N to u 0 U' aJ al Y N 0 to c 0 0 `u 0 C a to u �O 'O cuccu I I U d aJ d d aJ Z LPL LL Q Z 2 u m n.. 4..•Y I in a I ` c u '�O C cu to co C Q u tn 0 •� @ 72 a tn tu _ - s _ ±= a a+ r ._ r.. a (t. a '^CU c 3 3 L v 3 `0 1.- 1K Z m o c CO `-' 3 0 _:. 3 3 3F 3 3 x° 1* Orfr I - tb) w isa Lao •L7 a) N t N C CO co ° — O 4A •— O C a--� w > O a) 1/) O L _ a) 0. N 2 2 c do fB C U i ro z cu N v U Q O 0 cn C wen C U O c 0 Q c O c a) � O s_ cD U ca v 'i 40 D ( C m C� v - co c ` — C V C U O CD o ° O N in -0 O a) C U — t° v a..+ a) co CO i co f� f6 -c C 8 fu Q N E E z w O vs) CC • • • • ... 11 1 r • X 0 . .• 0.0 0 ° 2 V4e: • • , 1 z < A,,,,.• .• ric4s.) . . . , 16. aS V C f ' M 61/ 1 • N 'N 0 Ca i • -,.... \----1.• .. .(1) yc . > 1_ I 0 1 \_. r-:-: CO 1 0 -711,11 i -:-. .. --) milm. ---, \ . -, \ .41 i'd ' : • . a) ,.• ... , . , . . . .. . L.. o . um .,... . .,.. , \ milk , • \ . . ..... co •_.o , . . , k Z a460 STAFF REPORT RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT LJ RANCHO Date: September 17, 2014 CUCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mike Costello, Fire Chief By: Chris Bopko, Management Analyst Ill Subject: ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION DECLARING RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ELECTION IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.88-1,ANNEXATION NO.88-141 AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF SUCH PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13351 BANYAN ST, IN COMMUNITY FACIILITIES DISTRICT NO.88-1(DAR LLC,OWNER—APN:0225-191-37) RECOMMENDATION Consideration of approval of a resolution declaring results of a special election in Community Facilities District No. 88-1, Annexation No. 88-14-1 and ordering the annexation of property located on 13351 Banyan St. (the "Annexation Territory") to Community Facilities District No. 88-1. BACKGROUND On August 20, 2014, the Board declared its intention to annex APN 0225-191-37 into CFD No. 88- 1. On September 17, 2014, a public hearing was held regarding the annexation and following such hearing, the Board of Directors adopted a resolution calling for a special election to submit the qualified electors of the Annexation Territory a ballot measure pertaining to the authorization to levy a special tax within the Annexation Territory. A special election was scheduled for September 17, 2014 On September 16, 2014, the landowner submitted their ballot to the Board Secretary. The Board Secretary has canvassed the ballot and completed the statement of votes cast (see Exhibit "A" of Resolution). The Landowner cast their vote unanimously in favor of the levy of the special tax in the Annexation Territory. Adoption of this resolution constitutes the formal action of the Board declaring the results of the election and the annexation of the Annexation Territory to Community Facilities District No. 88-1 and directs the recordation of an amendment to the existing Notice of Special Tax Lien. By recordation of this amendment, prospective purchasers of property within the Annexation Territory will have notice of the special tax obligation affecting such property. Respectfully submitted, � 67-7 0 Mike Costello Fire Chief Attachments 1. Resolution No. FD 14-047 2. CFD 88-1 Map RESOLUTION NO. FD 14-047 P461 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA,ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILTIES DISTRICT NO.88-1,DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ELECTION IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1, ANNEXATION NO. 88-14-1 AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF SUCH PROPERTY TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors (the "Board") of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, California, has previously declared its intention and held and conducted proceedings relating to the annexation of territory to an existing Community Facilities District pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, and specifically Article 3.5 thereof. The existing Community Facilities District has been designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 (the "District"); and, WHEREAS, the area proposed to be annexed is known and designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1, ANNEXATION NO. 88-14-1 ("Annexation Territory"), and, WHEREAS, the Board did call for and order to be held an election to submit to the qualified voters of the Annexation Territory a proposition to levy a special tax in the Annexation Territory; and, WHEREAS,at this time said election has been held and the measure voted upon did receive the favorable 2/3's vote of the qualified voters, and the Board desires to declare the favorable results of the election and to order the annexation of the Annexation Territory to the District. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. The Board hereby receives and approves the CERTIFICATE OF ELECTION OFFICIAL AND STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST, as submitted by the Election Official, said Statement setting forth the number of votes cast in the election, the measure voted upon, and the number of votes given for and/or against the measure voted upon. A copy of said Certificate and Statement is attached hereto marked Exhibit"A", referenced and so incorporated. SECTION 3. The Secretary is hereby directed to enter in the minutes of this meeting the results of the election and the STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST. SECTION 4. The Board hereby orders the annexation of the Annexation Territory to the District and further determines that the Board is now authorized to levy the special taxes within the Annexation Territory as approved and authorized by the qualified electors of the Annexation Territory. SECTION 5. Immediately upon adoption of this Resolution, the AMENDMENT TO THE NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN (NOTICE OF ANNEXATION) shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder. P462 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this _day of , 2014. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a regular meeting of said Board held on the day of 2014. Executed this_day of 2014, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary Resolution No. FD 14-047 - Page 2 of 4 p463 41-- 1..... (n CO tI a ,c� co �, r i o N >: y C o v C U U ® a t \-44 li AV/WINO .' g \\ . ! Lg. x ,\ CC lc CD t'• m 8 ` • 11"66..j � Ay lse 3 in 4. 11�i •� '' s I lAvepueMq] Z is• �.N■ ir!ii • �n ny Japay308 a i AV ua)1!II1W AV uaneH • ny BSOWJOH AV PIa443iV rn Ay uewlWH fi v Ay p tAauin \ ilele10! 1 ce To a' 1ra, i g _ ;, lpill 1 .q a° Oliv :IT C CD Tl�lillr�l cr, co I- cti i i I;� .101.1 11111 ibis u .11I Resolution No. FD 14-047 - Page 3 of 4 C C MARK CROSS (+) ON BALLOT. BALLOTS.MAY BE MARKED WITH PEN AND INK OR PENCIL OFFICIAL BALLOT SPECIAL ELECTION NUMBER OF VOTES ENTITLED TO BE CAST: 1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1, ANNEXATION NO. 88-14-1 SEPTEMBER 17, 2014 INSTRUCTIONS TO VOTERS To vote on any measure, mark a cross (+) in the voting square after the word "YES" or after the word "NO". All marks, except the cross (+) are forbidden. All marks or erasures are forbidden and make the ballot void. If you tear or deface this ballot, call the Secretary of the Fire Protection District at (909)477-2700 to obtain a second ballot. COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 Shall Community Facilities District No. 88-1 of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District be authorized to levy special taxes within the territory shown on "Annexation Map of Community Facilities District No. 88-1 Annexation No. 88-14-1 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, County Of San Bernardino, State Of California" (the "Annexation Map") pursuant to the rate and method of apportionment of special taxes (the "Special Tax Formula") set forth in Resolution No. FD 14-030 to finance fire suppression and protection services and administrative expenses? YES [✓ NO ❑ For particulars as to the rate and method of apportionment, see the Resolution No. FD 14-030 a copy of which is included in your ballot materials. C C . CERTIFICATE OF ELECTION OFFICIAL AND STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )SS RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ) THE UNDERSIGNED, AS ELECTION OFFICIAL OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that pursuant to the provisions of Section 53326 of the Government Code and the Elections Code of the State of California, I did canvass the returns of the votes cast at the: RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 ANNEXATION NO. 88-14-1 SPECIAL ELECTION In said Fire Protection District held on September 17, 2014. I FURTHER CERTIFY that this Statement of Votes Cast shows the whole number of votes cast in said District, and the whole number of votes cast for the Measure in said District, and the totals of the respective columns and the totals as shown for the Measure are full, true and correct. I. TOTAL NUMBER OF VOTES CAST: I II. TOTAL NUMBER OF VOTES FOR FOR AND AGAINST PROPOSITION A AGAINST WITNESS my hand and official Seal this /7 day of (-e 2014. �'��, .» WITNESS y . sue ; •��� •'LIB ■ ; , L,I 1 . El,ction Official .1 )�;A r Ran •t Cucamonga Fire Protection District .) ■ State of California 1'�i1,\il}i. S �ii�llll ll Illy41A c c CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH NOTICE REQUIREMENTS RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1, ANNEXATION NO. 88-14-1 (APN: 0225-191-37) STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT The undersigned, under penalty of perjury, CERTIFIES AS FOLLOWS: The undersigned is now, and at all times mentioned herein was, the duly appointed, qualified and acting SECRETARY of the RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, CALIFORNIA, and as such, accomplished the notice requirements in connection with the referenced Community Facilities District, as noted: BALLOT PRESENTATION The VOTER PACKAGE was presented to all qualified electors within the boundaries of the territory(Annexation No. 88-14-1) proposed to be annexed to Community Facilities District No. 88-1, said presentation being accomplished on the %(p, day ofo{ b s , 2014. EXECUTED this 1 (ems day of £-{of-er.ta, , 2014, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. SE TARY OF THE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT RANC CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT STATE OF CALIFORNIA • c- RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 ANNEXATION NO. 88-14-1 ELECTION OFFICIAL CONCURRENCE The undersigned is the duly appointed Secretary and designated Election Official responsible for conducting a special election in territory proposed to be annexed to the above entitled Community Facilities District. Pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Section 53326(a), the undersigned hereby agrees with and concurs to having the special election conducted on September 17, 2014, or such other date upon which all of the qualified electors and the official conducting the election may concur. EXECUTED this /7 day of4A-a , 2014, at Rancho Cucamonga, California EL:&ION OFFIC RA 0 CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT STATE OF CALIFORNIA