HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-38 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 08-38
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2006-00224, A REQUEST TO CHANGE
THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM NEIGHBORHOOD
COMMERCIAL TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER
ACRE) DESIGNATION FOR APPROXIMATELY 4.79 ACRES OF LAND AT THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND SAN CARMELA COURT;
AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1089-581-01.
A. Recitals.
1. Charles Joseph Associates, on behalf of Baseline Victoria Park Partners LLC, filed
an application DRC2006-00224, requesting a change to the General Plan land use designation,
as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject
amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 27th day of August 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced public hearing on August 27, 2008, including written and oral staff reports,
together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to the property within the City; and
b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the
environment; and
c. The proposed land use amendment is consistent with the goals of the Land Use
Element of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, in that the proposed land use change from
commercial to residential will allow development of the long vacant commercially zoned site with
new residential development that is compatible with the surrounding residential development.
Moreover, the density of the proposed Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units/acre) land use
designation for the site will provide a natural transition between the Medium-High density
(14-24 dwelling units/acre) level of the condominium project to the north and the Low-Medium
density level of the single-family development to the east and west of the site. Finally, the
development of medium density residential development on the subject site will help to reinforce
the base residential population necessary to support local commercial uses in the immediate
area such as the adjacent commercial center, the Filippi Winery, the Winery Estates
Marketplace, and Victoria Gardens.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-38
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2006-00224 — CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES
August 27, 2007
Page 2
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1
and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The proposed land use amendment does not conflict with the Land Use
Policies of the General Plan and will provide for the logical development of the surrounding
area; and
b. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
C. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative
Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment
for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the
project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends that the City
Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows:
a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQK) and the City's
local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental
effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined
that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the
project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a
Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice
of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration.
b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration
and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the
whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in
compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no
substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The
Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the
independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the
Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration.
C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation
Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of
Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure
compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning
Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project.
d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration,
Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings
upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning
Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00224,
as shown in the attached Exhibit A.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-38
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2006-00224 — CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES
August 27, 2007
Page 3
Environmental Mitigation
Air Quality
1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating
condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor
shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly
serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications.
Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for
City verification.
2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall
submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed
schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors
shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction
equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and
found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform
to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air
Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning
staff.
3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards
noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied
either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray.
4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in
SCAQMD Rule 1108.
5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402
and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following
provisions:
• Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through
seeding and watering.
• Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads.
• Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to
erosion over extended periods of time.
• Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed
excavated soil during and after the end of work periods.
• Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local
ordinances and use sound engineering practices.
• Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City
if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occur
as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the
time of year of construction.
• Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind
speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403
requirements.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-38
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2006-00224 — CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES
August 27, 2007
Page 4
• Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul
trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means.
6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent
(approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board
[RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with
SCAQMD Rule 403.
7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall
be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for
96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions.
8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative
fuel-powered equipment where feasible.
9) The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction Grading
Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment
when not in use.
10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to
incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning,
appliances, and water heaters.
11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to
incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping.
Cultural Resources
1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before
or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist
to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to
protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the
archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will:
• Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from
demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for
the City to establish its archaeological value.
• Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of
archaeological sites within new developments, using their
special qualities as a theme or focal point.
• Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological
heritage.
• Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of
approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant,
important, and unique prehistoric resources, following
appropriate CEQA guidelines.
• Prepare a technical resources management report,
documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-38
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2006-00224 — CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES
August 27, 2007
Page 5
mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one
copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the
San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for
permanent archiving.
2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are
encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a
qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take
appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The
paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide
specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures
(i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where
mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but
not be limited to, the following measures:
• Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to
allow the rapid removal of .fossils with minimal construction
delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing
activities:
• Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or
graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the
monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel
make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately
divert construction and notify the monitor of the find.
• Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for
documentation in the summary report and transfer to an
appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum).
• Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San
Bernardino County Museum.
Geology and Soils
1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent
(approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10
emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with
drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible.
2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule
established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with
vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon
the time of year of construction.
3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed
25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such
episodes.
4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall
be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-38
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2006-00224 — CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES
August 27, 2007
Page 6
96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions.
Hydrology
1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall
submit to Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management
Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants
during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the
maximum extent practical.
2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading
Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies
specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the
time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion
of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following
measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and
construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced
in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance
program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does
occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be
corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a
specified time frame.
3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel
dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from
the site when there is rainfall or other runoff.
4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be
performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to
control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from
the site.
5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water
Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by
R.T. Quinn & Associates, (May 14, 2008) to reduce pollutants after
construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent
practical.
6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and
minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped
areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to
ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these
areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years,
shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the
issuance of grading permits.
7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to
the City Engineer for approval of a WQMP, including a project
description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce
pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent
practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-
structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-38
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2006-00224 — CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES
August 27, 2007
Page 7
Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho
Cucamonga in June 2004.
8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall
obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage
under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State
Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been
obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification
Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage
under the NPDES General Construction Permit.
Noise
1) Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to
the Planning Director and Building Official for review and approval,
building plans that demonstrate compliance with the noise
attenuation recommendations of the acoustical engineer as
contained in the Noise Impact Analysis prepared by LSA Associates
(August 2006), and on file with the Planning Department. Any
alternative methods proposed for mitigating noise impacts on the
project shall be prepared by the acoustical engineer and presented
to the City for review and approval by the Planning and Building
Departments.
2) Construction or grading on weekdays shall not take place between
the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m., including Saturday, or at any
time on Sunday or a national holiday.
3) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards
specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured
at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to
perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development
Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required
by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to
the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed
the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify
the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards,
then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of
compliance with above noise standards or halted.
4) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in
first phase.
5) Haul truck deliveries on weekdays shall not take place between the
hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. including Saturday, or at any time
on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used
for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from
the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise
Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the
extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass
sensitive land uses or residential dwellings.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-38
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2006-00224 — CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES
August 27, 2007
Page 8
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF AUGUST 2008.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: O
Richard B. Fletcher, Chairman
ATTEST:
ames R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary
I, James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,
passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a
regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of August 2008, by the
following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, STEWART, WIMBERLY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
M
III. DEVELOPING THE COMMUNITY
TABLE III-2A
LAND USE PLAN STATISTICAL SUMMARY-RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATIONS
CITYAREA SPHERE OF INFLUENCE TOTALS
Target DUs Target DUs
D (Probable (Probable Total Percent
Land Use Density Dwellinlq Level of Dwellinjg Level of Total Dwelling Total of Total
Designations Factor' Acreage Units Development)" Acre a a Units Development) Acrea a Units Target DUs Acreage
RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATIONS
Hillside(.1-2 1.29 127 13-254 164 697 70-1,394 899 824 83-1,648 1,063 3
du/ac)
Very Low 1.1-2 1.29 3,979 398-7,958 5,133 620 62-1,240 820 4,600 460-9,198 5,953 14
du/ac
Low 2-4 du/ac) 3.25 4,148 8,282-16,592 13,481 33 66-132 107 4,181 8,348-16,724 13,588 13
Low Medium(4- 6.5 2,042 8,168-16,336 13,273 2,042 8,168-16,336 13,273 6
8 du/ac)
Medium(8-14 11.75 -i-36 5,888-10,304 -8-1m ,7.36. 5,888-10,304 8,648 2
du/ac) MF707 7411 07 -
Medium High 20.25 376 5,264-9,024 7,614 376 5,264-9,024 7,614 1
14-24 du/ac)
High(24-30 27.75 55 1,320-1,650 1,526 55 1,320-1,650 1,526 .2
du/ac)
Mixed Use See 235 3,224-5,134 3,791 235 3,224-5,134 3,791 .7
Tables III-
4 to III-7.
Residential Subtotal -1T698 32,557- -5%30. 1,350 198- 1,826 X3,,,04 32,755-70,018 -66;456 41
1 O 67,252 S36 �'q 2,766 /3 DS SS SIS
The Density Factor is an expression of actual development experience in the City and represents a level midway between 50 and 75%of the range. It is used to calculate target
dwelling units.
'Range of dwelling units is the product of upper and lower threshold of densityfintensity range multiplied by the number of acres,and rounded to the nearest whole number. This range
is a theoretical potential.Some products may occur at or near the top of the range,however,most will not.
'Target density/intensity is the probable level of development based on City experience,except for Mixed Use Residential,which is based primarily on a target density.
'Mixed Use allows both residential and non-residential uses. Table III-1a reflects the residential potential;Table III-1b indicates non-residential potential. Dwelling unit and square
footage figures are aggregated from Tables III-4 to III-7.
s Percentages have been rounded to equal 100.
City of Rancho Cucmnonga General Plan Page 111-19
October 17,2001 ZICE,vER L PumFMW2001 cPLUntvner R,r,,i.d,,,
CITY OF RANCHO C UCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN
TABLE 111-28
LAND USE PLAN STATISTICAL SUMMARY-NON-RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATIONS
CITY AREA SPHERE OF INFLUENCE TOTALS
Probable Target
Square Feet Square Feet Square Feet Total
Square Feet in
Dwelling (in (in Total Targef Percent
Land Use Designations Acreage Dwellin Units in thousands' thousands' Acre a a Units thousands' thousands' Acrea a DUs of Total
NONRESIDENTIAL
Office 4-1.0 FAR 128 2,230-5,575 2,230 128 .4
Neighborhood Commercial(.25-.35 J&r -- 1,819-2,546 1,819 }&T .5
FAR) IG Ib
Community Commercial(.25-.35 109 -- 1,187-1,661 1,_187 109 .3
FAR
General Commercial .25-.35 FAR 528 5,750-8,050 5,750 528 2
Recreation Commercial .25-.35 FAR 9 98-137 98 9 .03
Subtotal 71 r.19-M 11,084-17,969 11,084 9 ( 3
Mixed Use .25-1.0 FAR 682 7,427-29,707 11,883 682 2
Subtotal 682 7,427.29,707 11,883 682 2
Industrial Park(.4-.6 FAR) 657 -- 11,448-17,171 11,448 855 3
Haven Overla .4-1.0 FAR 198 3,450-8,625 3,450
General Industrial .5-.6 FAR 2,016 43,908-52,690 43,908 2,016 6
Hea Industrial .4-.5 FAR 904 15,751-19,689 15,751 904 3
Subtotal 3,775 74,557-98175 74,557 3,775 12
Open Space 0-.1 du/ac) 491 NA NA NA 2,512 0-158 3.003 158 10
Conservation 86 NA NA 1,262 1,348 4
Flood Control/Utility Corridor 1,705 NA NA 1,928 3,633 11
Subtotal 2,282 s,702 7,981 1 25
Civic/Regional .4-1.0 FAR 166 2,892-7,231 2,892 1 166 .5
Community College .1-.2 FAR 191 832-1,664 832 191 1 .6
Elements School .1-.2 FAR 169 736-1,472 736 169 .5
High School .1-.2 FAR 118 514-1,028 514 118 .4
Junior High School .1-.2 FAR 131 571-1,141 571 131 .4
Park 371 NA NA 371 1
Subtotal 1,146 5,545.12,536 5,545 1,146 4
Arterials/Freeway 4,063 NA NA 100 1 4,613 13
Non-Residential Subtotal tt88 98,613-158,387 103,069 5,802 741"9.1 59
GRAND TOTAL 24,587 32,557-67,252 98,613.158,387 103,069 7,152 198-2,924 31,739 55,634 100
Range of square footage is the product of probable upper and threshold of intensity range multiplied by the number of acres,and rounded to the whole number. '73
'Target intensity is the probable level of development.
3 Non-residential FAR Range:lower number is the probable FAR on average,but in some cases it may be lower. Higher number is the maximum FAR for any specific project.
'Mixed Use allows both residential and non-residential uses. Table III-1a reflects the residential potential;Table III-lb indicates non-residential potential.
s Dwelling units,not square footage. Open space is the only non-residential category that permits residential units. Numbers of units are maximum yield based on a target of 62.5%of the range. The Open
Space designation within the City area is applied only to existing golf courses. Residential potential is therefore considered zero.
6_Percentages have been rounded to equal 100.
Page 11620 The Planning Center
Z:IGENERAL PLANIFina12001 GP LU Master Report.doc Octoher 17,2001
VOW
III. DEVELOPING THE COMMUNITY ,
TABLE 111-3
EXISTING GENERAL PLAN(AS AMENDED THROUGH OCTOBER 17, 2001)
AND 2001 GENERAL PLAN ACREAGE COMPARISON
CITYAREA SPHERE OF INFLUENCE TOTALS
Existing Existing Existing
General 2001 General General 2001 General Change General 2001 General
Plan r Plan Land Change Plan Plan Land in Plan Plan Land Change
Land Use Designations acres Uses acres in Acres acres Uses acres Acres acres Uses acres in Acres
RESIDENTIAL
Hillside .1-2 du/ac 135 127 8 946 697 249 11081 824 257
Very Low Density .1-2 du/ac 3,985 3,979 6 604 620 16 4,589 4,600 11
Low Density t2-4 du/ac) 3,893 4,148 255 314 33 281 4,207 4,181 26
Low Medium Density 4-8 du/ac 2,011 2,042 31 2011 2,042 31
Medium Density 8-14 du/ac 79'& 736 yy -I Qo 275 736
(39)-
Medium High Density 14-24 du/ac 423 376 47 423 376 47
High Density 24-30 du/ac 79 55 24 79 55 24
Mixed Use 50 235 185 50 235 185
Residential Subtotal 11,35 11,698 33 Z 24Y 1,864 1,350 514 13,049 7 -
NON-RESIDENTIAL
Office .4-1.0 FAR 227 128 99 227 128 99
Neighborhood Commercial .25-.35 FAR 11 1 +76 167 4 ft 1.78 167
--M-
Community Commercial .25-.35 FAR 109 109 0 109 109 0
General Commercial .25-.35 FAR 762 528 234 762 528 234
Regional Commercial 91 0 91 91 0 91
Recreation Commercial .25-.35 FAR 24 9 15 24 9 15
Mixed Use .4-1.0 FAR 158 682 524 158 682 524
Industrial Park .4-.6 FAR Haven Overlay 1.0 940 855 85 940 855 85
General Industrial .5-.6 FAR 2,125 2,016 109 2,125 2,016 109
Heavy Industrial .4-.5 FAR 939 904 35 939 904 35
Open Space 0-.1 du/ac 393 491 98 2,837 2,512 325 3,230 3,003 227
Conservation 0 86 86 0 1,262 1,262 0 1,348 1,348
Flood Control/Utility Corridor 1,486 1,705 219 1 2,847 1 1,928 919 4,333 1 3,633 700
CivicJRe ional .4-1.0 FAR 19 166 147 19 166 147
Schools .1-.2 FAR 651 609 42 23 23 674 609 65
Park 409 371 38 74 74 483 371 112
Arterials/Freeway 4,161 4,063 98 73 10027 4,234 4,163 71
Non-Residential Subtotal fZ-4S-12-,M 12,889 J= f 5,864 5,802 52 18,691 rtL -167-
GRANDTOTAL 24,021 24,587 376966 7,718 7,152 566 31,739 31,739 0
Acres rounded-off to the nearest whole number.
2
Mixed Use allows both residential and non-residential uses. Table III-ta reflects residential potential and Table III-11b indicates non-residential potential.
Ci1p of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Page I//-21
October 17,2001 Z.WEVERAL PL4MFinn12001 CPLUM t,,Repnrudn<o