Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989/11/16 - Agenda Packet - (2) CITY OF RANCH0 CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: November 20, 1989 ACTIOI~ COI~qENTS :'~'!~,~ TO: Residential/Institutional Design Review Committee Larry McNiel David Blakesley Otto Kroutil Betsy Weinberger (Alternate) FROM: Beverly Nissen, Associate Planner SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW COMMITFEE MEETING OF NOVEMBER 16 ~ 1989 The following is a description of projects which require review and rating by the Design Review Committee. Please review the attached plans, visit the project sites, and write down your conments using the blank space provided under each project on the attached sheets. After the meeting, the consensus of the Committee's concerns will be typ, ed up as the formal action/recommendation of the Committee and distributed to the Commission and Council. As always, feel free to contact the appropriate project manager (noted in parentheses along the left margin), prior to the meeting date, if you have specific questions related to the scheduled projects. Dinner will be provided between 5:00 - 5:30 p.m., Consent Calendar items will be reviewed between 5:30 p.m. - 6:00 p.m., with the first design review item being heard at 6:00 p.m. Please notify our department if you will be unable to attend the meeting, or if you will be late, so that the dinner can be properly ordered and the necessary arrangements made. 6:00- 6:45 (Steve R.) DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 13280 - LUSK COMPANY - The design review for building elevations and detailed site plan for a previously approved tentative tract map consisting of 145 single family lots on 23.9 acres of land in the Low-Medium Density Residential District (4-8 dwel ling units per acre) of the Victoria Planned Conmunity located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Belvino - APN: 227-081-06. - y DESIGN REVIEW AGENDA NOVEMBER 16, 1989 Page 2 6:45 - 7:30 (Jerry) ENVIRO~I~ENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89-26 - COMMUNITY BAPTIST CHURCH - A proposal to develop a 9,664 square foot fellowship center, 4,320 square foot of classroom space and a 7,900 square foot gym addition to an existing 11,000 square foot church, in a Medium Density Residential Distri'ct located on the northwest corner of Beryl and 19th Street - APN: 201-221-08. 7:30 - 8:15 (Bev) DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13564 - (PHASE 2-5) - AKINS The design review of building elevations and ~led site plan for 145 lots of a previously County- approved map consisting of 182 lots on 81.9 acres of land north of Summit Avenue and east of Wandman Bullock Road - APN: 226-082-24-26. BN:mlg · At ta chme nt s cc: Planning Commission/City Council RESIDENTIAL CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS AGENDA November 16, 1989 1. l'F 14316 - LEWIS HOMES (Brett} Revisions to architecture. Committee Action: The Committee (Blakesley, Weinberger, Coleman) reconTnended approval of the project subject to the following conditions: 1. The standard local street with 60 feet of dedication and parkways should be provided on Street "A". 2. The applicant should submit a standard detail for the trail · street crossing to be used throughout Tetra Vista. 3. The trail node at the northeast corner of Rochester and Church should be provided. Lot 11 may need to be reduced at its southeast corner to -accommod ate this feature. 4. The turf block fire access should be eliminated if possible. 2. DR 10210 - LOTS 13 (NOROIC) (Bey) Review of site plan. Committee Action: The Committee {Blakesley, Weinberger, Kroutil) approved the site plan, but did not approve the architectural elevation. The right side elevation should be upgraded with architectural detailing similar to that which has been provided on the rear and left-side elevations. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 6:00- 6:45 Steve R. Nove~er 16, 1989 DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 13280 - LUSK COMPANY - The'design review for building elevations and detailed site plan for a previously approved tentative tract map consisting of 145 single family lots on 23.9 ~acres of land in the Low-Medium Density Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) of the Victoria Planned Com~jnity located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Belvino - APN: 227-(~31-06. Background: ll~is project was last reviev~d by the Design Review Committee on October 5, 1989. At that meeting, the Committee directed the applicant to revise the architecture to address the following concerns: 1. The single car garage should be off-set from the two-car garage to create more variety along the streetscape. A bonus room should be substituted for the third-car garage on 15 percent of the units. As an alternative, side-on garages could be provided. 2. Increased architectural treatment should be applied to the side and rear elevations of every plan. This should include: a. A greater percentage of hip roofs within the tract. b. Chimneys detailed to match the front elevations. More variation in chimneys should be provided. c. More substantial trim around windows and doors. Trim around windows should be 2 x 6 minimum. d. Additional windows. e. 360 degree siding. f. Pop-out windows. 3. ConneCting fences between houses should be provided and should be of an 'upgraded masonry material. Staff ~m~nts: The applicant has attempted to address the above issues in their latest 'submittal, but staff does not feel that they have addressed the concerns of the Design Review Committee. The Committee should address the following items: 1. Variation among the three-car garages has been achieved to a limited extent, but the garage doors are still flush with one another on many of the elevations. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS T 13280- LUSK COMPANY Page 2 ' 2. The siding does not appear to end at logical points along the side elevations, although some elevations have addressed the issue quite well. Additionally, trim around doors and windows should be 2" x 6" rather than 2" x 4". 3. Chimney caps have been varied but many seem too large and prominent. Their size should be minimized but should remain consistent with the style of the structure. 4. Side elevations still appear to be very flat and boring - add some elements to create shading along the sides. Design Review Cowittee Action: Members Present: David Blakesley, Betsy Weinberger, Otto Kroutil Staff Planner: Steve Ross The Committee recommended approval of the project subject to the following conditions: 1. Transitions from siding to stucco should occur in logical places. Changes should be made on many of the elevations to address this issue. 2. Additional articulation should be added to the garage side elevations on several elevations. 3. All return walls should be architecturally compatible with the homes.. Gates should also be provided which are also consistent with the design scheme of the homes. Design of the walls should be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. Multi-pared windows should be provided on all prominent windows, including the upper floor of the side and rear elevations. 5. Two inch by 6 inch trim around all windows and doors should be used throughout the tract. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 6:45 - 7:30 Jerry November 16, 1989 ENVIRO~ENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT' 89-26 - COMMUNITY BAPTIST CHURCH - A proposal to develop a 9,664 square foot fellowship center, 4,320 square foot of classroom space and a 7,900 square foot gym addition to an existing 11,000 square foot church, in the Medium Density Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) located on the northwest corner of Beryl and 19th Street - APN: 201-221-08. Back9 round: This project will occupy a currently undeveloped portion of the site where a previously approved project was to be built. The previous project (CUP 86-02), approved by the Planning Co~ission on July 9, 1986 was considerably lar~er (47,000 square feet) than the current proposal. In an amendment to CUP 86-02 approved in September, 1986, the Co~nission approved two temporary trailer classrooms which are still in use. One trailer is proposed to remain until the completion of Building "B". The other will be removed prior to the start of construction. Building "A", an 11,000 square foot church building also approved under CUP 86-02 is the only existing permanent structure on the site. The proposed improvements include the completion of the rear parking lot and the construction of Buildings "B", "C" and "D." Staff Con~lents: Site Plan: 1. Enriched paving at the two entrances on Beryl should be finterlocking pavers with concrete dividing bands. The design should be consistent with that approved with CUP. 86-02 (see at tachment). 2. The walkways through the parking lot should be interlocking pavers. Landscape Plan: 1. The double row of Carrotwood trees should be continued on the east property line north of the second entrance on Beryl. Elevations: 1. The proposed colors are inconsistent with the colors used on the existing building. 2. All colors of glass and n~llions should be consistent with existing building. 3. Clarify elevations to show those areas where smooth VS textured stucco will be used. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS CUP 89-26 - COMMUNITY BAPTIST CHURCH Page 2 Design Review Comittee Action: Members Present: David Blakesley, Larry McNiel, Otto Kroutil Staff Planner: Jerry Guarracino The Conmittee {McNiel, Blakesley, Kroutil) re_viewed the project and did not recommend approval as presented. The applicant was directed to revise the plans addressing architectural concerns as follows: 1. Provide an architectural style which is compatible with the surrounding residential area. 2. The design of the proposed building should be updated. Colors or materials similar to those used on the existing chapel should be utilized for continuity. 3. Vary the repetitive nature of the building by: a. Changing the rhythm of window spacing. b. Vary window sizes and treatment. c. Create a focal point on the building to generate interest and life on the Beryl Street elevation. The focal point may be achieved through either height of the element or materials used. 4. Remove the parapet roof dividers. This approach adds to the dated look of the structure. 5. Move toward a more residential rather than institutional look for the buildings. Staff can provide examples of recent projects to demonstrate techniques which would be appropriate. In general, the basic bulk of the building needs to be changed. y 6. Define an architectoral style and use appropriate design elements to achieve the desired appearance. 7. Provide samples for enhanced paving as shown on the landscape plans. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:30- 8:15 Bey November 16, 1989 DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13564 - (PHASE 2-5) - AKINS The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for 145 lots of a previously County-approved map consisting of 182 lots on 81.9 acres of land north of Summit Avenue and east of Wardman Bullock Road - APN: 226-082-24-26. Back9 round: The Conmnittee (McNiel, Blakesley, Kroutil) originally reviewed the project on October 19, 1989. The project was not approved at that time and the applicant was advised to address the following concerns: 1. Additional detailing should generally be provided on all elevations. 2. More balconies should be added to the Monterey floor plans. 3. More substantial cornice detailing should be provided. 4. There should be greater differentiation between the three architectural styles. 5. Where porches are provided they should be more substantial. 6. Driveway treatments should be upgraded to provide a more distinctive treai~nent. The distance from the front yard walkway to the front of the garage should be shortened. 7. Gates in front return wall should be constructed of substantially sized members. Revised plans will be presented at the Comnittee meeting on November 16, 1989. Design Review Conmittee Action: Members Present: David Blakesley, Betsy Weinberger, Otto Kroutil Staff Planner: Beverly Nissen The Committee (Blakesley, Weinberger, Kroutil} approved the project with .the following items to return on the Consent Calendar prior to Planning Commission review: 1. Driveway treatments should be upgraded to provide a more distinctive treatment. The distance from the front yard walk way to the front of the garage should be shortened. 2. Blank side elevations, primarily on the one-story models, should be enhanced. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS TT 13564- AKINS Page 2 3. Detailing should be added to the San juan elevations. Some other material, such as clay or brick, may be incorporated. 4. The left side elevation of the Plan 2 model should be upgraded. The applicant should consider extending the length of the trellis. 5. The applicant should consider providing multi-parted windows on the Monterey e 1 evat ions. 6. More functional balconies should be provided on the Monterey e 1 evat ions.