The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1986/06/19 - Agenda Packet ~ CITY OF RANCH0 CUCAM~ONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: June 3, 1986 ACTION AGENDA TO: Commercial/Industrial Design Review Committee Brad Buller 1977 Suzanne Chitiea Herman Rempel Dennis Stout (Alternate) FROM: Nancy Fong, Associate Planner SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING OF JUNE 19, 1986. The following is a aescription of projects which require review and tabtrig by the Design Review Committee. Please review the attached plans, visit the project sites, and write down your comments using the blank space provided under each project on the attached sheets. After the meeting, the consensus of the Committee's concerns will be typed up as the formal action/recommendation of the Committee and distributed to the Commission and Council- As always, feel free to contact the appropriate project manager (noted in parentheses along the left margin), prior to the meeting date, if you have specific questions related to the scheduled projects. Dinner will be provided between 5:00 - 5:30 p.m., Consent Calendar items will be reviewed between 5:30 p.m. - 6:00 p.m., with the first design review item being heard at 6:00 p.m. Please notify our department if you will be unable to attend the meeting, or if you will be late, so that the dinner can be properly ordered and the necessary arrangements made. ' ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86-16 - ~T. pARTNERS - The development of a 15,000 square fooI office building on .85 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7), located at the northeast corner of Utica Avenue and Civic Center Drive - APN 208- 062-06. 6:30 - 7:00 - (Debra) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86-15 XLLIANCE PARTNERS - The development of 2 office buildings of 6,00G square feet each on 1.0 acre of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7), located on the south side of Aspen Street between Utica and Red Oak Avenues - APN 208-062-11 and 12. NF:ko Attachments CC: Planning Commission/CitY Council Dan Coleman, Planning Division Joe Stofa, Paul Rogeau, CO!~4ERCIAL/INDOSTRIAL CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS AGENDA June lg~ 1984 1. DR 85-46 - DAY CREEK Review of change in color scheme. ' (Debra) Committee Action: The Committee felt that the colors should ~ become too bright in the sunlight. Perhaps a shade darker would be more appropriate. 2. MDR 86-09 - GROA~T Review of satellite dish. ' (Scott) Committee Action: Location of the satellite dish antenna on the side of the building is not appropriate. The antenna should be relocated within the equipment area of the roof or should be ground mounted with appropriate screening. 3. DR 83-02 - BARMAKIA~ Review of revised building elevations- (Debra) Committee Action: South building elevations are to be consistent with previously approved plans. 4. CUP 84-31 - DIVERSIFIED Review of wall signs for Lucky's. ' (Nancy) Committee Action: The Committee recommended that the proposed signs advertising "Dell", "Bakery", and "Liquor" be eliminated. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 6:00 - 6:30 Dino June 19, 1986 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86-16 - O.T. pARTNERS - The deve 5,000 square foot office building on .85 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7), located at the northeast corner of Utica Avenue and Civic Center Drive - APN 208-062-06. ~s~Parameters: The project site is a part of the Office Tennis Executive Center. The site is rough graded and improvements on Utica Avneue and Civic Center Drive are fully improved except for drivewaY. Site Plan: 1. The Master Plan for the Office Tennis Executive Center indicates a pedestrian walkway ending at the northeast corner of the project site as shown in the attached Master Plan. This pedestiran walkway should be extended through the landscape finger and across the drive aisle to the proposed building- Architecture: The proposed architecture meets the quality desired for an office complex in the Indutrial Park District. Design Review Committee Action Members Present: Suzanne Chitlea, Herman Rempel, Brad Bullet Staff Planner: Dino Putrino The Committee recommended approval subject to the following conditions: Site Pla.~: 1. The pavement treatment for the pedestrian walk from the proposed aisle to the tennis pedestrian walk should be consistent with the approved design for the Office Tennis Executive Center Master Plan {other approved projects)- 2. The proposed plaza surface treatment should be continued from the plaza to the drive aisle crossing- LandscaPing: 1. Parkway street tree planting and parking lot trees should be consistent with the approved Master Plan for the Office Tennis Executive Center. 2. Increase the parking lot landscape finger area at the south end of the proposed pedestrian drive aisle crossing, incorporating specimen size tree(s} and plaza area surface treatment- DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 6:30 - 7:00 Debra June 19, 1986 land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7), located on the south side oF Aspen Street between Utica and Red Oak Avenues - APN 208-062-11 and 12. Design para~ters: The proposed office buildings are on Lots 1 and 15 of the Office Tennis txecutive Center. Streets are fully improved, parkway development will occur with the construction of buildings. Staff Connents: Site Plan: The proposed site plan appears to be consistent with the conceptual' master plan. Additionally, the site plan provides texturized entry plazas connecting the two buildings and outdoor patios bordered by raised planter seating, shaded by a vine convered collonade. However, the site plan could be improved with the following: 1. A shared trash enclosure (double bin) should be provided versus the proposed individual ones, and should be relocated away from the streets. 2. The compact car parking spaces within the texturized pavement entry areas should be changed to standard size in order to lessen the likelihood of these trees being hit by cars (see attached)- Architecture: The proposed buildings are single story and identical except The semi-circu ar window treatments are compatible with other for color. 1 structures proposed or under construction within the Tennis Executive Center. Design Review Coam~ittee Action Members Present: Suzanne Chitlea, Herman Rempel, Brad Buller Staff Planner: Debra Meier The Committee did not recommend approval and directed the applicant to address the following concerns: 1. Pedestrian Connections: The project does not have any pedestrian connections toward thesouth. There needs to be connections from the bulk of the parking area to the office entrance and also connections leading toward the access to the tennis court. 2. Architecture: The Committee does not believe these buildings are in character with the rest of the Tennis Executive Center. They also think the "mirrored-image" approach is not appropriate. Similarity in building design would be acceptable with discernable differences in treatment in height, width, bulk, etc. 3. The conceptual landscape palette of this project should be compatible to the other approved projects and the Tennis Executive Center Master Plan in order to achieve an uniformity of landscape materials, especially on perimeter streets. 4. The texture pavement for walkway leading to the tennis court throughout the Master Planned area should achieve a compatibility in materials and treatment. 5. Revised elevations shall be submitted for the next Design Review Committee meeting. 'ING CURB AND GUTTER ' ASPEN STFt~ET SIDEWALK PR ~OSED BUILDING :lAMP LOT 15 < pJ ;IKING / PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN