Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout92-289 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 92-289 A RESOLUIION OF THE CITY (X~NCIL OF IHE CITY OF RANC~O CUCAMONGA, CAT ,TFC~NIA, ~ DESIGN REVI~ FOR VESTING T~NEATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 14475, A RESIDt~VIIAL SUBDM SION OF 66 SINGLE FAMTT,Y LOTS ON 113 ACRES OF LAND IN THE HTT.T~IDE RESIDI~EIAL THAN 2 DW~.T.rNG UNITS PER ACRE) AND OP~q SPACE DISTRICTS, IJDCAT~D NORIH OF AIM3ND AV~qUE B~ SAPFHIRE AND TURQUOISE STREETS, AND MAKIN~ FINDINGS IN SUPPORt THEREOF - APN: 200051-07, 55, 56, AND 57. (i) Sahama Investments has filed an application for the Design Review of Vesting Tentative Tract No. 14475 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 25th day of March 1992, and continued to the 8th day of April 1992, the Planning C~t~ission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing. ~ne hearing was subsequently continued to a Planning C~,~t,~ssion workshop on the 27th day of May 1992 to discuss design alternatives. (iii) On July 8, 1992, the Planning Ccmm~ission conducted a duly noticed public hearing and continued said hearing to August 12, 1992. The public hearing was again continued to September 23, 1992. (iv) On September 23, 1992, the Planning C~tutHsSio~ conducted a public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. After receiving all public testimony, the Planning Oat~ission approved the application through adoption of their Resolution No. 92-123. (v) On October 5, 1992, an appeal was filed with the City Clerk with regards to the Planning C~t~t,~ssion's approval of the application within the time limits prescribed by law. (vii) On November 18, 1992, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (vii) All legal prerequisites have occurred prior to the adoption of this Resolution. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follc~s: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. Rssolution No. 92-289 Page 2 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on November 18, 1992, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and (b) That the proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is (c) That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and (d) That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition as set forth in Planning Oa~,dssion Resolution No. 92-123. 4. This Council hereby provides notice to Sahama Investments that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 5. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return-receipt requested, to Sahama Investments at the address identified in City records. PASSED, APPROVEI), and ADOPT[D this 18th day of November, 1992. AYES: Alexander, Buquet, Stout, Williams NOES: None Den~s L. Stout, MayBr Resolution No. 92-289 Page 3 I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY Cl.FRK of the City of Rancho Oacamcrrja, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 18th day of November, 1992. Executed this 19th day of November, 1992, at Rancho Oacan~nga, California. . , 'ty Clerk