Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout92-267 - ResolutionsRESOI/3TIONND. 92-267 'A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCMO CIXZAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC IANEMARK DESIGNATION 92-02, THil~BY DESIGNATING PFARSC~ FTI.I.TNG STATION AND GARAGE, LOCATM) AT 12912 FOfYFHILL BOULEVARD, IH~EOF - APN: 1100-161-02. WHERFAS, The City of Ram_ho Cucamonga has filed an application for Iaxxizerk Designation 92-02, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark Designation is referred toasthe "application". WHEREAS, On August 25, 1992, the Historic Preservation C~uLHSSion Of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and, following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 92-04, thereby rec~uLer~ to this City Council that said application be approved. WHEREAS, on October 7, 1992, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolutionhave occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and resolve as follows: SF3TION 1: The application applies to property located at Assessor Parcel Number 1100-161-02. SECTION 2: R~presenting both the Etiwanda citrus c~unity and the importance of Route 66 to American culture and folklore, the structure harkens back to an era of agricultural growth and mass western migration. Offering fuel, mechanical services, and often a helping hand, the station and its owrmrs were an important part of the local area. Tne proposed la-rbark meets the following criteria established in Chapter 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code: Historical and Cultural Significance: 1. The proposed Landmark is particularly representative of a historical period, type, style, region, or way of life. 2. The proposed landmark is an example of a type of bailding which was once oatuton but is now rare. 3. The proposed Landmark is of greater age than most of its kind. Resolution No. 92-267 Page 2 4. Tne proposed landmark was connected with someone renowned, important, or a local personality. 5. The proposed landmark is connected with a kusiness or use which was once c~Lon hut is now rare. 6. The architect or kuilder was important. B. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance. 1. The construction materials or engineering methods used in the proposed landmark are unusual or significant or uniquely effective. C. Neighborhood and Gecgra~c Setting: 1. The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. 2. The proposed Landmark, in its location, represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, oamt~/nity and City (Ord. 70 S9, 1979). SECT/ON 3: Designation of a Landmark is exempt frcmn CEQA (Article 19, Section 15308). SECTION 4: Based on the substantial evidence received and reviewed by this Council and based on the f/nlings set forth above, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City COuncil of the City of Ranc~o Cucamonga approves the designation of the Pearson Filling Station and Garage as a Historic landmark. PASSFD, APE, and ADOPTB]3 this 20th day of Jan, m~y, 1993. Alexander, Gutierrez, Stout, Williams NOES: None Dennis L. Stout, .yor Resolution No. 92-267 Page 3 I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY c~.RRK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Oa~, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 20th day of January, 1993. Executed this 21st day of JaD~ary, 1993, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.