Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011/01/12 - Agenda Packet - PC Workshop • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA , PLANNING COMMISSION Lt J. WORKSHOP AGENDA ANCHO CUCAMONGA JANUARY 12, 2011 - 7:00 PM * Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL To ORDER Roll Call Chairman Munoz. Vice Chairman Howdyshell _ Fletcher_ Wimberly Oaxaca • I II. NEW BUSINESS • A. PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW - DRC2010-00935 - PACIFIC COMMUNITIES BUILDER, INC - A review of a proposal for an 80 unit multi-family development on 13.8 acres located within the Commercial Office (CO), Low Medium (LM) and Open Space (OS) Districts at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Cornwall Court - APN: 1100- 201-05. III. PUBLIC COMMENT •. . I This is the time and place for the general public to address the commission. Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda. IV. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. I, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on January 6, 2011, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. Vicinity Map Planning Commission • Workshop January 12 , 2011 IC j 21 UP c i t E d i i 0. c 2 d ,a Y I d Q = = m y e0 . Y 2 i rscm. S 19®t• •� s` Base Line (SI r> Base Line jj Agate rp Church t i� _ .� Church A oothill r ' �� ifir / , Foothill F1 Arrow i e o f c 'Arrow c a Jersey L f 3 MI > E o i es! o d W _ _Wj ° � N .�. c 1 6t N 6th L F > - 0 t , _ _ .Q E- r ,i !4th 4t11 nvm * Meeting Location: • City Hall 10500 Civic Center Drive • i • STAFF REPORT Petita PLANNING DEPARTMENT t L'a'.J DATE: January 12, 2010 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: James Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2010-00935 - PACIFIC COMMUNITIES BUILDER, INC, - A REVIEW OF A PROPOSAL FOR AN 80 UNIT MULTI=FAMILY DEVELOPMENT ON 13.8 ACRES LOCATED WITHIN THE COMMERCIAL OFFICE (CO), LOW-MEDIUM (LM) AND OPEN SPACE (OS) DISTRICTS AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND CORNWALL COURT - APN: 1100-201-05. Review Process: The Pre-Application Review process provides a project proponent with the opportunity to present schematic designs to the Planning Commission prior to formal application submittal in order to receive broad general comments and direction. The focus of the meeting is a discussion by the Planning Commissioners regarding the technical and design issues related • to the project. The meeting is not a forum for debate and no formal decision or vote is made. After the meeting, staff prepares minutes of the meeting, which are sent to the applicant. Request: The applicant is requesting that the Planning Commission review their proposal to develop an 80 unit multi-family project on 13.8 acres, on a project site located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Cornwall Court. The site is currently divided into multiple development districts: Commercial/Office (Foothill Boulevard District), Low-Medium (LM) Residential (Etiwanda Specific Plan) and Open Space (OS), along with multiple easements (Metropolitan Water District and Edison). A large portion of the site is currently being used as a • storm water retention basin that the applicant has informed staff is no longer needed for storm water retention. The site will need to be rezoned in order to be developed with residential housing. The multi-family development west of the site was rezoned from Community Commercial to Medium Residential. To the north is a City park that is zoned Low-Medium (LM) Residential. Staff believes that the most logical zoning designation for the developable portion of the site is Medium (M) Residential within the Foothill Boulevard District. The site will then match the zoning of the property to the west and the new multi-family development to the south (across Foothill Boulevard). The site has approximately 120 feet of developable street frontage along Foothill Boulevard. Proiect Density: The maximum density within the Medium (M) Development District is 8-14 dwelling units per acre. Staff has informed that applicant that density for the project will be • based on the developable portion of the site (5.25 acres), but will not include the multiple utility • easements. The proposed density is 15 dwelling units per acre, which exceeds the density range permitted within the Medium Development District. c Item A PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP A PRE-APPLICATION REPORT January 12, 2011 Page 2 Entitlement Requirements: The following entitlements are required to develop the site: • • Development District Map Amendment • Specific Plan Amendment (remove a portion of the project site from the Etiwanda Specific Plan and add to the Foothill Boulevard District of the Development Code • General Plan Amendment • • Development Review • Tentative Tract Map Design Recommendations: • The project is currently proposed to have a wall running along the sites of Foothill Boulevard frontage. Staff recommends that the applicant move the proposed recreation building to the Foothill Boulevard frontage in order to provide the site with greater visual interest as seen from the right-of-way. Additionally, the vineyard landscaping and architecture themes used by the project to the west should be carried across the entire street frontage, including the various easements. • The applicant proposes constructing attached two-story townhouses that front onto private streets. Staff feels that the current layout will lead to a project with a street scene that is dominated by garage doors. Staff strongly feels that the project should be redesigned so the there is a central green space that runs the entire length of the project. The units would then either face the green space or the private street, with all parking accessed by a • separate drive aisle at the rear of the units. This will reduce the amount of private open space, but will increase the amount of common open space and will make the project more livable for the residents and create a more visually interesting street scene. Additional Project Requirements: • There is a planned 20-foot wide Regional Trail that runs across the site that will need to be incorporated in the project. • The applicant will be required to install the right-of-way improvements along the entire Foothill Boulevard frontage (including utility easements) as required by the Foothill Boulevard Visual Improvement Plan. Res tfully submitted, ovuoi P . • Jam R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director • JRT:TV/ds Attachments: Exhibit A - Preliminary Site Plan No. 1 Exhibit B - Preliminary Site Plan No. 2 Exhibit C - Preliminary Site Utilization Plan • Exhibit D - Preliminary Floor Plan Exhibit E - Fire Comments Exhibit F - Engineering Comments A-2 .y PARCEL 1100-201-05, RANCHO CUCAMONGA • PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN AMINIINIIP 11/19/2010,SCALE 1'=100' EXHIBIT 'A': PROJECT AREA BREAKDOWN d;yv's 1'h t C .�diS d%i �� '''.,{<;,.I - °T •' dk � °• ♦ .•.ka a and t Z:i•• d•''L i .• 'd!•° ' s (_ k •k! *:; •• 'd'd Y i' bi:: Y 'd♦ A Pd k".0'1 ;547 j' kkk•Lts y! rfd.P) S` dkLti. ) ' Zr , d= ;47. I ' i ♦♦t:::% v 4 ✓d;:4 • kd •,•. k.'i •.y 3 k r.,, e#�� 4 yipu•♦t , fie 49d . :.., k• {♦. . M'':dy ° .sl. �rvl ti♦t L✓k t'r k.d•1s'y4•.�ti••g✓4k dii. .•'.'♦k♦ . d� ♦ ♦ ' '.`1."�.,wh?..3a#4 ' I 1•`t Y�R•k♦ 'i••✓ie k+'t•'A`•7° t tr.: L'••.'♦d' • r *.•'d ♦f.•,., / , ' 4-11—-PARCEL■^• i♦�,wsd ' y Nig♦:• • d d r' x 17)P4; BOUNDARY ^dk k r �"£ a M Ok d ♦j•kk✓dP d. ♦d'd µ,. 'Y' >c«v</ 1 y♦!A • •- sds Nab k.Y tdks J • p 'dk ✓*}"' /A k • •k ..r cod .•-`• sd S k♦k r>: S �J +.£ 1:/ ,1, I d'••..t✓s �M ♦'�'♦'i 1'a•♦✓♦'♦i♦•` i`3'd f•`•r'id♦'''P O' n 3''' � :� T� x� ya r ✓♦ . Y.ry♦ C. .a 4L'1P'sk ♦ s k t '' e -r 4k4' h♦.g4S✓'.-2.Tit:♦ 4d d.kkd,• e.•+•,P F'sd did 4x iht' , :P�' A k ll kd P k Z`•°•s '-k♦•'ii k P if••-d add ♦• ry .:� - T'•kfdbt tiiikk itht,ia kd' J ) i! ' 1 q.r Z• moo' �♦,p'�� ko♦dd' :okkk dk 1 , ..- DR / wi skdi�♦ ✓rd Ld 'dd9 • ♦d / d l': EDISON 'fry''.s s• .d✓♦a dykkddrd°1 EMS . I wk♦k4**.Yd♦i •t i i P '''.L 'd♦♦t•''dRi'•L ..$kk'!♦Jdsd♦l rd d if / t , . ' 3 +0 r ••♦dxdPd♦ P♦• •d eS �;40k33::::♦"r Ctkd',n+. deZi'dy r;,G r p ' �'iyk''♦v,�Ii, . H.i%S'yD�ye•'1' 1 d,A♦y : '•d `0'0 / :o- °s• r •i•d.k,�Fkkydw#i"w'y01!rJj. igl .i ' , / , 4• f %� `••k'✓kd•✓`•' da�'d•j.•ilefl fy'•.!;• '1' , i 1 Sa, F � C+'.ti :"3t a:Y!�{'.i:•�1� /: C!J4✓e 15'DEDICATION TO CENTER LINE, TO CITY 'G .1 FOOTHILL BLVD: C/L - LOT AREA DEVELOPABLE LEGEND: -(ACRE) AREA(ACRE) ;, d,.e27.. :_C=d:•d,��. m,•;•.+∎.•dy.•e.♦-Ch•♦kCk S�r�2S.•i DEVELOPABLE t Pak .♦ ,it:$4 d C .:,:;.'::::::•:$:1.. fsS.,:x• AREA 't•r, D ,', 4.30 - • 0.66 - 0.23• - G- -.- 0.76 - 1LO7R01O A-3 EXHIBIT - A i Dear Tabe: Per your request, attached is the exhibit showing the sizes of the following: • - developable portion of the site - each of the easements. Below are the requested open space calculations: Description Provided Required Private open space 1.11 acre 14% 150 SF Common open space 2.33 acre 30% 30% Usable open space 3.44 acre 44% 35% The open space requirements are fulfilled on the developable portion of the site. If you should have any questions, please don't hesitate to let us know. Thanks, Elaine Yu • Project Coordinator Pacific Communities Builder, Inc. 1000 Dove Street, Suite 100 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Tel. (949) 660-8988 ext 164 Fax(949) 253-0683 Elaine(u(?pcbinc.com • • A-4 PARCEL 1100-201-05, RANCHO CUCAMONGA PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN 11/17/2010,NTS _L«T . ., .,. .: II ...___.,_ wir-ir ,, ' ... , _.. IL 1 , •yt:t GARCIA PARK t.Iii r . 'fli..Ati- - . • AMINO REAL/ � - __ 7 APARTMENT ti =.`.- HOMES p�pk®acA�Exrm .�. ''*, / _--- • {:I ■ JIB_ a ..II-_ I ._� I _ •.i -/ J - / - - -- • ----- -=~-=am=l�'� a'-- �;�'; -X �� -- -a y r1 • -r===_=w=11,1 r r , - _- y :/ / /- == = woi1LiL*!; it r/ --,,... sit. . , .4 ,; a ' ' .:::::!.•::::::".2111=.---1".4 ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN „%:/0:/' =`-::-• =_=-=-- == '.,ill'All-,,..-- - -- am.- - // / , „________,..„......„...„._„• ...,......4.,..A.L„_.„._„,....„. III - . 1' .-'11'. 11". .4, . _. :::::::::ww-mmly, ! ,,,,.4 , ,,t::::3,13,,st.,....„..3..ixtj.;....„...„.„.",.., *Rik ?ii.u! . ,. II • iimvs, ,,....4„ %,...141.241.2.K,24.17-i..414.-...-..,:iff.L.N......41:1,7 ? ,_ f'• ‘.fr.,il 1'1':-.111tWill ;1 .3T,12=1.1.0' ,,,‘,' / 4-13::::::::::::Stiniss-2.32E-1_37i i , •- ROUTE 66 � ,. %ii/�ji%/ .=- __=__-_-=-==-=• =--- --=° i; n 1 iii ......1:1"...281...41.'...__ _ _ ______ _____ tilt um '4, ,,,,f,- •,, .J it 014s:.;,....-:.:.:•..'-1--,.„..,.flPap +1011 4%// fi..:...._ •-_._._ ••__„- :,. :.1 1 II t : ;I::: ! 'We. • •//,,,/9,1 r,..-....,----,.,....,,...=::=.--_,-_-_-_:.-x-----,..7.-zgrx• itiatipiefitio t L., . / �' -. FOOTHILL ILOULEVARD(.ROUTE j _ _ - - . _ -.�.,- � - — yss Fooi1>iu OJuJ! ss VICINITY NAP SUMMARY: LEGEND: ?I': NO. OF DU 80 SERI.usww-ru ac r3,:r ® .sty. . I SITE AREA, GROSS (ACRE) 13.0 -'I.p31 ' DENSITY, GROSS DU ACRE 5.8 .E'.ro°°""°r°°°'smcr Milit PARKING I GARAGE 180 w c.�mson usoolr GUEST �I 1S P� TOTAL 70 wI.m,c,En. m.ck ws m E mar • ,.e... -..� R..o TOTAL 230 ...... GRAPHIC SCALE PARKING RATIO 2.8:1 s,am c^•" 'r -'rcrt TOiw,°i s�.uaosEs I PROJECT SITE SITE COVERAGE, GROSS I5.5S ROPOSED SAND USE MR w 177 09:9,1M, REVISIONS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I SAAL 55 ® .n�.1.......4 �_APPLICATION REVIEW Doom"` N GUERRA&ASSOCIATES,INC. 1t.�1 EXHIBIT - B A-5 �K n mown.sr.n2 e.woo acArn c.u anSO PARCEL 1100-201-05 DQ 6 •r+pro�'-m PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN ...a,.,x.Re<w„ 1 u 1 'ms, i:,nJ --SC �� J • ; at., J1 y!!ft f:-.1 >;— *ic- rv �[� 1, �'ct,,.,7 j .! '� y{ a 4j ctrrnirti:,!_, �#Q f^ ry„ti w♦ E'k4.ayl-- - f (ti► ,+, • 3 ''. `/a , ;31Jf1.1F kLL ' �' o ' :� -- -' f� '� •tr~ ' ! lL 'rte }1 _ ,;•e! .„ 1� _ ya _ ` 1.. _'y -...,.,.0. ,..,-.;� ,..4...t.-:c.4., ; .! I J 4)- k. .., .114.63 T,., 1�tiq.:%' , , . . f 1, �.� /Drfs 11.6 ;-rc: �O'1n f,y�,�r 1,`- •� :•.., ra,v ki l�f. r r r £R.:f� ,`b A ..t -7 n • •t, qt.. �� ti �.+�k ,v�3 i .,rim” ' =} �� -11. ', '_45.0%-;. aIV t 1_`•�. y,r4 , __ }f� `r,• ,:v-..,.;,,,,/./...,•!• 1[iii �� !' i t ;*Yf .1�' .../ �� ` lAir . ,‘--,:5 \ f :G,6 t r- E.Q.cag t.- a """ � �`=;` � 1 .'— X111-fix jlyj � 'I• '� •'tip• m AO+4.1+0 9 '''''--*-- 'Ir.=•—■6- . ..... .:.i 4 2 ;,..,,... -East 4.,oe•,--,---.,..--,--.H, ,....,t1i.. 7.,...c. . -- ---- :kag 1. 1; -, 4,1 *.-- - !.• ' - 5 4 L 4 o _ f. .. 4 f l.:) " I * •A 4 ,' S I � " � rti d � ' �- C ` - Q•t t i ' ` `\ . � ' -.� 1 'R 1 -111 ter. i D•; - 4 ..c-,,,,, � ...., 0 -.a.'4 jiL - -,1- '1...".7„.:-.1 41.,...,'..11.1.Fit.....,-.rip?4-:: et sr.,Ilk , .12.- .11101e � � � :s ill K>• ' r ►' -F 't.* 14 fill :1 ,t' t - .!d + �ii . al � ,' ..• y .1j1,414:1 ., t .F o .♦ ,,0 t er. a`x i. • i -,, .6,;'‘,. %••••NP4,0-•:' 'V'4 ■ sr' .q - k•-• 1:fix _ 1 , y r . • # •.,, r ,f,« 4,y ,, 1 s_ 1' 1 I i Io a t .. ,. • •-rr.,-,-..T ` •G f ma ' ^ , - .r•-.-'`A r' F �T -11;n'; �! 4 P.y . -..f- I 7 � .. a- N , ■ ',On t �' P `l .� r i T ' 12 11-%• .�+ : . y 4.` ' \ � P = t`♦ -7 -1, ' MA , ...lir•.111t,:.,;"■':7. ': l'.0 , Ifir . i.',..r ., . ..',.. ,' •-•- -"-....'3 . . r _vs - i ..,.,•:-..7.,::,-,- r ' • t4.4.'r� s, -.�° x. \'.". ` �, r__ ' 4‘..211'na va.g6n.Ln E ' •• ii.il fbJ; LiiA.e EXHIBIT - C ,1k \ 1I E.; .. , PARCEL 1100-201-05, RANCHO CUCAMONGA PRELIMINARY FLOOR PLAN 11/5/2010,NOT TO SCALE • I-6 _2-_6' 25-2 26_4' 32'_0_ t I PLAN 4 't ! !PLAN 1 �, PLAN 3 o PLAN 2 9635E �� 1449 SF , cl - 1834 SF 1636 SF — -I--- r ; _ j la 164 ' %-i4; AAIA.III' v e _. �.., A � he _ -- TAI da l In I-1 r-I I--i ¶U I I r-I r-I impi mu Irk Irl I—I �I 'r' it I bo loi --- o SIDEWALK PRIVATE STREET FIRST FLOOR , s 8"PN .,,.,:�FFF� ., .,1_ �"sX11°IfOglkP iri ol _1iPi1nI1ro SECOND FLOOR run am.iii B 1 R•I L 1L J . THIRD FLOOR MAN INFO RANI I 6[6N3 I 'IAN 3 I RAN4 No.of Bedroom 3 12.OFC 12.2 OFC 14.Lon No.Of Bath 210 T 210 I 3 y 3 1st rim. 565 i 364 426 820 SF 2nd Floor 864 1 623 747 1143 • 3N 0 629 661 0 TOTAL 1449 1 1636 1334 1963 rims REVISIONS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA °` PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW "` EXHIBIT - D PARCEL 1100-201-05 ^^ A-7 PRELIMINARY FLOOR PLAN / a ! � cue4ty Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Q 4,1;$,. • ' Fire Construction Services • __FIRE PRELIMINARY REVIEW COMMENTS • December 16, 2010 Pacific Communities MFR development 80 Dwelling Units Foothill Blvd west of East Ave at Cornwall Court DRC2010-00935 Fire Construction Services (FCS) has reviewed your plans. Following are our observations of your project based on current state and local Fire codes. 1. The fire access must comply with the RCFPD Standard 5-1. The plans submitted do not comply. The fire access plans must be prepared in accordance with the standard. Clearly indicate the turn radii and clear width. 2. Pay the Fire preliminary review fee of $110.00. For the subsequent submittals, such as the development review or the parcel map, please pay the fire fees at the time of submittal. • 3. Provide a fire flow letter to proof the required fire flow of 2000 GPM @ 20psi. Indicate the proposed type of construction for each building. 4. Clearly indicate on the plans that the buildings will be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers and monitored by a listed central station fire alarm system. 5. On the plans, indicate the type of construction and occupancy for the proposed buildings. 6. Annexation to the Fire District's Community Facility District is required. Please contact Janet Walker at (909) 477-2770 ext. 3003 to begin the process and obtain a clearance. If you have any questions regarding the fire review comments, please contact Moises Eskenazi at (909) 477-2710 ext 4209. • A-8 Page 1 of 1 • PRE APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2010-00935 ENGINEERING DIVISION COMMENTS Type: 80 MFR Location: NEC Foothill Blvd. & Cornwall Ct. To Planning Division: Tabe van der Zwaag 1100-201-025 P&E Date: 11/30/10 By Willie Valbuena Ckd Betty Miller Planning Commission Workshop Date: January 12, 2011 Please include the following issues in the Staff Report for the Pre Application Review: 1. Developer will be required to install frontage improvements along the entire length of the property, including about 535 linear feet fronting utility easements. a. At a minimum we will want curb, gutter and (curvilinear) sidewalk installed across said easements. Streetlights and street trees may be subject to easement holder restrictions. Metropolitan Water District (MWD) does not allow trees over their pipes and Southern California Edison (SCE) may not allow streetlights under their lines. b. Complete the Foothill Boulevard median from Cornwell Court to join the existing median to the east per City Drawing 2255-L. Developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost of landscaping south of the centerline from future development across the street, but shall also pay a fair share for any frontage portions installed by others. 2. Since this is a multifamily development, the homeowners association will be expected to maintain all frontage landscaping, including street trees, and all parkway enhancements per the Foothill Boulevard Historic Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. Planning Commissioners may want to discuss the extent of such improvements to be required across easement areas. 3. Developer will be required to complete the master plan storm drain between the existing basin inlet and outlet structures. Drainage fee credits/reimbursement will be available for actual costs in excess of the Middle Etiwanda Drainage Area fee($30,810 per net acre). Regional Mainline drainage fees will need to be paid at building permit issuance. 4. MWD agreement to the parking proposed in their easement shall be obtained prior to tentative map approval. 5. Gated access from Cornwall Court shall conform to the City's"Residential Project Gated Entrance Design Guide," which includes a concrete drive approach off the cul-de-sac. • Page 1 of 1 A-9 .as. .;•v.t.::::. ,..,-... .: : 2.-.. ., -, , , .. . , ,c, , . �' g'. 0 r a- a.)cl,da CNI E °Ct c‘i. a ' O w t r E. a • �,; C 0 c al v 4.) !a dO .+-) . i ne ..zo-!:'r 1, Vd` CA I' 0 .... i I � CD r 1 co r . C 0 an E d , 0 C. . e . d. r cc 9 q . m r 7 ' y l , r. C/) . f U t • O rc - • I? .' ? 4_, - C!) r O • - ) ,� I 0 0 4- o s . � N rwmi • O `� • It o C.) 3 ° a; C E-I '" .(7 ,_cr t...1 lk . . W ' - zr _, _ _. . // /. I 1 Ct p ct • 1 1 O ; rip CO � � j. O® O •E • rl I. o E Ct I a) N ct aie ; 4 le -,I. (1.) '-S u e Ct CA E aZ (---40.1" l 5 1 :" :41t "ia, / 1- !( �O U N f� C cI ° o Si . Wit C . •CA �O ct 0 774: Ct IV 0 • • 0 r.0 � ;..4 et et 4:1 • L 't-4 • y--, •r•, }, ;* •-i 0 ct 4 U ,,,., �O U U P.( 4- - C a - � st tiv dc,,,- } k;.;r 4 t fir... + :. ;F:" a Vl f U N 0 '� es E cd cam, ce ct �l �' r � p � a cn 3_4 u • -' V 4--,) t #.4 -.4 E -� Oi stap b0 ct vi N at ct 1 7:3 CIZ p O cc3 ,�1.0 v_c C i�� 0 0 ca4 \\....,c. , , , r i 4ttl�^5y` fi • at / i C I) be v o CA CD wi ) , 0 � -l • 0 4- rd c • � ct 1 0 0 o p O `} p ,-, p t bi) rn O • :- . i z , ^i htr •CiC t /' vt ' U ..:-ZJ • 1 1. I ci) C li 'l U 0 • N eMi . • . • . a �.� O C 1 e O U 0 on. ai v N p c}, •� O CO co • cd tto .4z1 bb c:14 vi • • , --+ 0 — • '"' CD w w (--- NS. /---; 1 6 .ti 0 I'Ci 0 1 N J' U cti Ti Mte U O O 0 ,-� ct �. • — o U 0 -4.->U • N U • 0 O bA N 0 O-+ • R • ( • I 0 O U � 11.) CD s-i CI 0 U 'Li _� • 0 Sai ›. ; U ‘-+ %Inme •' v c bra, • v ct O U 4—+— iii : 00) cu • � c ° < 6 e ,C1 - ,—' N en d' �( T 11 -;1,4 1M r k110' .e v... N" " I c • 1.) U CA O O . �,• il J c-* 0 ,. •� - U' . c.) et �• � O ct b0 1 en a� =bn o o t o au flUN H O = •}� O U O U, a) 't O C �:) .,• , CA 0 t . N a) O ri Z ct < I Z O 7.1 CA C'e tI /,i L is 0 0® C 1. a 0 . ICM E 0 s..,li o • . 4.) I ii, w .,.) N i61 CD a ii E n ¢' • • 1 Q tv-Hj�."w Lit f- Ct b//Ct C to • ,.,� bA 14 I..) ] L/ N As H. 0 Cit 0 "a • 1--1 a> t I ECA o 'e U a1 O U •� • • ,Z, • z 2 - • ct O • (bUA Z N• r2 , , •,,,v, i z ,_ YC yM>:C y r • !V.'" ,•5 . ,;:f:.„ -- , ,- 7, :, .. , 1 C 4,0i ., , . . .. - L___,„,_i____ t rojANI\ l• eml _,...-- '41••\ ' ,i, •• 1 - - t -21- 1 ''‘.."11,' N) ..... 7 co > -:. , Ao . ,t--:• - ca.) _ z cn P., 3> • • ...% ge a . . m 0 „,, op 4 0 "Pwi ,. ■1 M * n %in r%) Ci 0 C CD E . .... • e•• —. A: 0 I ED • 0 f en ■■• m i= W elm , xi . . . . . • r. `es = —6 ' 0 t oi. -pit-C3 ,° 0-44 g x • . • . _I. , r %.• ... 711 en 1,3/4 . . . . co .■• W a, ar Jo"' . r ' Co Dm • . < -0 CD xi 7,, CD I M ''enC . r9 r 6 •-° -1 E —1 . . , I el. ilMINID Or • IIM efr Z . 'I ■ 1 11FM CD 4S0 X 15 . •. . Z. .° ° 0 a) m • • o w „ 01) AIM• f■IP is. ;13 . r-l- • 0 m a) M 'at M E :., N 0. . ., . 1‘) rt. 0 m f-1- —I 14 Ca -I ,.. ' . I■t . n O N) ..• z 1:1) •-f- :. . , • 4•a I■I• Ls.r+ —• z . , c.c), N 2) CO . . c. 0 sp C nop, M. 0 . I . 1 . MO 4.10 IMO WWI • . : \ • W r . I ' 0 ° M {. ;. , • ' h , Sf ieThe + tl>I l y •y, fits F ke6S Ei$ t V14:1 sr.;.; A"� f t I • 2 E 4- 1 C"i ,(, +1d �A •'i `• 1.-• `e I i. f =7 i m ]jC i+h r 1,g; , !I.,-1 ` �f • gign (S yy��.1h•1.1 '; ] .o r� aM.>_ � _ ig't�.",'.'g *!4t ]'7r iI .c.. ,,vopep 4-,8. ra anyepuemp3 O e anye s .aa' `, wv.;]1St 4. -t v, .. .•s. � v "i t 4 �I • 3— .. �III .'. 1"Tr�: - j-. �l opune5 3 T F --' .• r .�I(�..�,�1I(Iwp�_�j1 ,1 Ff 'I]+P, i 1 q.r' - , ' 3.,:�i... id' Si_.- A! Lei IN — ' U WU t r- 4'.a t.- ••III1tPE",`f�. , �c ,iU L.�"" {t " �• m `YR.7 rb• ^S . �J --r.''• ,fit M r: R, Y I ` 1., II 1!d 6'k t o t. .a 3 F �p rSrril1{gym ' 1 �,2 a •t ' tf erg ..t ••• \` .� .ru31r r"J'-1..4i JS7 e ra II f °"dod-+ >N_. • "51 • monau�8 e1A �4''_.' y .' ■1 .4.. _Z r 111t� f �•J L 7f•r •`7 'N. t :l - 1 y •�, -, f1b •••‘21. 'mot • t 0 Pasture —t- ''',.:517.5,w, I ' = . •Ipppp& O1•.. d jr--�' 4 - 1 ,---,, -1 ..- 317 . f , 0 az,�%dam` 0 , ` ;''�� �;' r ym �r-r4 r.n rF'•.t 1•"y.. , —..lie 'p',r`, P,,w1 ._, '^ti r -r`.•y-,lwci �"p Z�, I�p iawc Y \� I fl -AT ti )t ti n �m1 i* ° ,. ' 1'{.UL,u.4 t rq cry r 1r )t] , / J "'a t�� `L '1 ;,x11' ]sr i IG ''4. , .ii p '� •ff3 mfr \F "t}yYnj or •�,t..., 4,, •• J_('�S S r..-4/ 1 I tl4 o �•, ! fJ 1 i V,4 f r r. ^y '�. ?d...•d/ r !t' I Q I V` IDlsante0 f ', Li jig, --T. • I 03 .1.. 'fa. 5. •�r...ranraVi P 4 'el'k +U�v.L.i Sy 69; • }, 3 b 3 / „ ,}(;Cyy R') : W y*'Ito,' -.r-y�� o ms ,----u....w-.-..a c .r..........W..iy.. l flr'-vic t mtl --111 '1 o, (tr:. gg/''..i.) .,jh F A {-. h .-' tiVR4f'� lra -• 2. -u..IcS 40.5' - r, � 1 j. 1 N "S 1 a 1 .". a atti .0 i! L't�I ,04,,1,�,1 !N 1- A .,, r ] J 3.k1∎"'n ' �.iti.. , 11 'js .,1 - et a.-eg . I _" 14.;'- ...iri aF-ya , Ir r \ (, .� t, ,tot „tee If tlr�! e � � --J . j (. 'n k 9 v� +biy"' .zi (` <`i:l� S�/flJam t.—y�1 ... �1 �A i,�i Rr -7 m �I t..11J 1j oft. L \., ` /Y:'�t s �rr�+."yY 1-.. ]_ 1f J 1 R.4 t t! Y. 'yVr.�+• w d.r.. _ ,:• :'.-h y4 " $h;t:lien ';w t 5'Mgr, aL ` lay IV.n.R AMOK '. II (;11 , ,,,:. IlX1.0,RY MO V + E..�.�.R...z.... -- ..'"e' ■''''"."*'', ! ' ' ..1 \ , ttiEti ',,, e-Z1 r i'ii l v srrlF t � c1 4 1 ..\v. \Y 1�� it t' . ii.H. - 1 ( ,•Ia ' .., ,,/° i Vc- ■NrileM1 1 �— t1 t' `7 ecNa i'•9r•w � 1 (A)—o..re,.y1,OP TIM..,....ur ~ L LB`°� 'Y"�,V BANKS RESIDENCE LEGAL DESCRIPTION 0:gut-1.0.-0- 15181 VICTORIA STREET THE EAST 1/2 OF LOT 2 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA BLOCK "K" 4)1754) ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS C Immo y CD : , . f•,- Cr) . 4 .:v1r1r, J (N.:::::„_. -kill I '',4 „ • ' \ iv _____1 ' X x -r- del 557.17° ' , t 0 :3 4.0:—.. . •foi3/44. , - ,..,, .41 _ ; ll .r „ ' ,. f",. 1 ' , vi7-1"i II" '""" :42"‘--- I' 'r, , p , hir.... :II) A i 'Iviiigt ;It - . l' • ' . , * •"-A, -1.t, :-..„, ei-",;-- ,7"'i ,,,p' ,,,,, 1, • ti, 4--- r 1 ''': :,4/,'''''' • - , • 1'4;1: l'if, ■!.::1 ,NI%Va:‘ .: I!''11/41 I 1“ r•t I t, ,'1,.. ''12'.11— -t. ,tes.."--r4i. . -- 4.. "4".4,4 'I' ''..s,'• iiic4..41,,,e$4, , -•:sri---t.-,-....,--,,tr.,zr- : fr.,"ft ,ts, re,...:.1.e.„Ar.„,,al-r.,7 ,,,,,; ssesIte..._ 0,',4„.4,,is,,, s i'l.,`11,A 1,irl..,•\ '.. .„ , ., . , 1,,t) is- „....4„,,T„,--;_z-_;',,,.t.,4,....., 7 , `t11.941■,A 44,`... ...1.;',''. , 1- 1 , ' 1. ', • ' .T. 14e,c, ..:- "; -'•••-fris,„,, ' •ss-f it.4,:i• .t",.: 14—.. rt? " • X, 1 i4I is , k i P•,,,,,i i ,-;",' ''''''- •.-?71:-.74L.4-.... ,-• .ivIt vit.-- , c..i e •••.•.t 11,4 ,2 „ .,4 .. .el ,..,,,•,' ,'‘, ' -",,...4'.t.,4,1: I"-:".rss—cri"..,C-s ' '— its • " ' 1. 14,,, ,?,.6, .,,,,,i , tist-; 1 -.... 1 '"'r ,-1 '<es- '• flmt *"?..:- ,,t, '''' ' {4'1 . .: -- s -',1%%?°•,‘" - V.* .i. • . 1,s :,- " T ve'-' .., 0.0*. ipP4,; .,:„/,p;•,,,6-,by. c,.:.,:•-itkat-:et, ci -1?-14:;••• : .----„_- --,•,-;,- ---.: • =1 • :tic 1 iii 'R,•34,174•;.1,,..e;fti.,,.1.4.7;4;'1,i ----4:-..-2:. ' ::: ---. .),..-= . .. ..- -f..-,..t.....; , ,... r•-- .. .,,, , ,,,-: ri •,,,\:••A,A,t,AotA,\A4',rs'„Ally ,. • .41' 1"4,.,,,, . .- 7' .:.+4. ., ■ , is"T,41 r• it-' %..r cr. 1 I.,'M ' SiiilY iiii; 1'177'4"-f lia i. i '''1 • , I ' •■tp= ,' :i''''ir iii '. ; • 1 '' - . • ,,,be 4.' V i VAir 11,14/7 ) C. 'I : /fit T.,,itE•., 1,4gP . ''' 1. ''' 1/414c,`,th%■II'llgtborsirteristI ts....II I : 1 II f ,,„ is " .I. ' 'tn". I II '1r P 3 it • ,.. i'. ,. . 1:41;404,411.,c4ti,- '411 2 eztt- ...t .-1•10.44, ;71/4"-kft ,'1 ; ,,, t; „Ex,1:,-.„, Lif., ' ,,,- , 4- -%'-'ii. -....' ' ' '.. AP,i4-:r•ive'L, •-• ,.- ,?...• • 11 •• • 2 1. ...T.,,t1.A.;tote olitat 4 , ',Li . 1,..S -.. t' %..:.. 1,. ''.- r‘...A.!'■In ''''“ • PA. Ve IP 40, 7,i,.PP i•',' ,77, ', x , ,11 ',4t,,,''•-4,4,i'alt,il'',7b,,,,”' 147 ''. • ":. ';‘,9 L'igli;t '''■I h...cktf ftt ' . . Si' , • ,.. ,It. V an. %.,,N. 'a ta., I ' r.11 44.4•1444144', L'V1/4e7i1°'.. ' , ' ."-11 a Si ..i.. ..,+.0... , r., • , - - ii',,,, .." . + ,--A • 11 .t 4. , i ' g i t.!' -. .. . I - P. 4 0I ,,, _ • • • t "' ; \;' 30r 0cOS vc —. (D el' << al � CT C2. CDCz N1S * o _03 -Isn O00 •Q D -o Q� adO O � Q � — O z O -• � (D CD D) 2) 1./.13 0el- -• � 0 CO 5. 121 � 0 � � OOH �"• � 0w CDD ? 3O n• er � 'Eli C Q0 m0O - C O n � eta r+ 0 ° C -1 (DOO y Cb 0 C) C �+ n -I . -1 cn CO —11 M CD ca O 7OCQ• if 1111• � a km• � 3. 0 � N 0. � O O � n �• � cn O 0 0 n t Oi, cD CD - 2 V1 � cc ,� m , o n A _. 0 a) m a" am cD Z I < o Cs CCD = Z -is . . 3, o • v3 � 7 -• na,fre7, m cD n 0 • 0V 3 • oo � � On m N Cl) i r ,l • Q el- ..i. • � m r Page 1 of 2 • Fowler, Steven J From: Jones, Jason [jgjones @ryland.comj Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 4:05 PM To: Emami,Houman Cc: Fowler, Steven; Douglass, Richard P.; Moraes, Craig Subject: RE: New Houses @ Rancho Etiwanda Estate (Stillwater Way) Mr. Emami, Thank you for your e-mail outlining your concerns in regards to our upcoming project in the Rancho Etiwanda community. Below I have provided a written response after each issue (1 through 6) in the body of the e-mail you sent me on Sunday, January 2, 2011. Please feel free to respond with any follow—up questions or comments you may have. Thank you, Jason G. Jones Director of Land Development/ Purchasing Ryland Homes - Southern California Division From: Emami,Houman [mailto:hemami @mwdh2o.com] Sent: Sunday, January 02, 2011 7:54 PM To: Jones, Jason Cc: Fowler, Steven; RRaya @meritpm.com; RAichele @meritpm.com Subject: New Houses © Rancho Etiwanda Estate (Stillwater Way) Good Morning Jason Per our conversation on Thursday December 15, 2010, @ Day Creek Intermediate School I brought up • the following issue that I have concern to you and Steve Fowler with City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1- How you would manage the dust control since we are in very high wind area and my neighbor • and I have pool which could cause damage to our pool pumps and extra cleaning I would like to see your plan and procedure shows how Ryland Home plan to overcome the issue if the issue come up. During construction activities Ryland Homes will employ stringent dust control measures that meet or exceed governing agency standards, including but not limited to the application of water using hoses and/or water trucks, the protection of loose stockpiled materials using covers or dust palliatives and the suspension of construction activities during high-wind events. If there is an issue concerning wind blown dust or debris with an adjacent or nearby property owner Ryland Homes will address each issue promptly and work diligently on a mutually agreeable remedy with the affected property owner. 2- Regarding traffic since I have young kids I am concern if there is not a speed bump (speed Control measures) installed, the construction traffic go over speed limit in the residential area which the speed is 25 mile/hour and it could cause accident that either one of us would like to experience, I would like to see your plan and procedure shows how Ryland Home plan to overcome the issue if the issue come up. 1/12/2011 6 Page 2 of 2 • Ryland Homes will install a temporary "speed-bump" on Stillwater Way near the intersection with Union Ct. as a traffic quieting measure during construction hours. Please note that all Ryland contractors and consultants are required by Ryland to conduct their operations in a professional and safe manner. Ryland requires that all its employees, contractors and consultants adhere to safe driving speeds and practices while working within the Rancho Etiwanda community. • 3- Ryland Home phase of construction that was shown to us on Thursday December 15, 2010, cause us to go through the construction twice which is very unfair to us that have house in Stillwater Way I would like to know if Ryland home plan to change its construction phase so it would not cause us to go through the construction twice. Ryland homes will maintain its existing Vista Heights project phasing. The impacts of the Vista Heights project construction activities will not increase or decrease on and around Stillwater Way regardless of how the project construction is phased. Ryland Homes and its contractors will practice high standards of operations and safety while working in the Rancho Etiwanda master plan. Our goal is to be a professional and respectful neighbor to all existing residents. 4- What time in the morning Ryland Home start its construction and what time it would end; also, does Ryland Home planning to work on Saturdays and what is the start time and finish time. Monday through Friday: "Start — 7:00 a.m.; Finish — 5:00 p.m. Saturday (on occasion): "Start — 8:00 a.m.; Finish —4:00 p.m. • *Work days and Start and Finish times are subject to revision based on City and HOA regulations. • 5- Name of the Ryland Home on site representative which will oversee Ryland Home construction during this project, his/her email address and cell phone number so if there is any concern we can get hold of him/her first to discuss our issues. I will provide you with a contact name and number for our site superintendent once construction activities commence. Until that time you can contact me, Jason G. Jones on my mobile phone at 951-453-4320 or e-mail at jgiones(aryland.com. 6- Street cleaning so far the street been clean and we have no issue, but with construction there will be dust, mud, concrete, and other construction debris over the street which it cause damage to our vehicles, I would like to see your plan and procedure shows how Ryland Home plan to overcome the issue if the issue come up. Ryland Homes will adhere to the approved Storm Water Protection Plan which requires the immediate clean-up of any mud, dirt or debris that exits from our site. In addition Ryland will perform monthly street sweeping/cleaning on Stillwater Way west to the Ryland project boundary. 1/12/2011 s The City of Rancho Cucamonga December 30. 2010 • 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91729 Ehab Ateia 12647 Naples Way Rancho Cucamonga. CA. 91737 To Whom it may concern: My name is Ehab Ateia. I am a resident in the community called Rancho Etiwanda Estates which is located on north Day Creek Boulevard. It is a fairly new gated community. I am a neighbor to an existing empty lot where Ryland Homes plans to build several homes. The area where Ryland Homes plans to build is strictly dirt and rocks and it is literally my backyard. There is a hill slope of approximately only ten feet from the ground of my lot to the lower ground of the Ryland Homes lot. As you are aware Ryland Homes will begin excavation on these lots on January 26, 2011. I have a pool in my backyard which I am concerned will get contaminated with dirt from the excavation of the lower land. I expressed my concern in a letter that I sent to Ryland Homes in October of 2010. I never received a reply from anyone about this letter. In fact no one from Ryland Homes has made any effort to contact me whatsoever. I finally spoke to Jason Jones early December of 2010. Jason claims he is the VP of operation for that development.The only reason I question his title is because of his lack of professionalism and courtesy. I told Jason that my fear is din from their project entering my pool and causing damage to the very expensive equipment filter for the pool. I told him that I am aware of`dust control' measures that need to he in place in order for the inspector to clear them for excavation. We have very high winds in my area and I have a rod-iron fence dividing my lot from their lot. I expressed to Jason that I believe a pool cover will be the only way for Ryland Homes to control the dust from entering my pool. Jason told me he would get hack to me soon. Two weeks went by without any communication again with Jason. I tried to speak to his supervisor. Richard Douglas, with also no success. Finally after many messages Jason did return my call without an apology for the delay in response. He simply said he would not purchase a pool cover for me. I asked how he would control the dirt from my backyard and he replied by saying they will control it with water." I told him that it is foolish to think that water alone will control the din from entering my pool. Jason was very arrogant and rude and did not offer me any other solutions to ease my worry. ie.at least a tarp or a pool blanket. I was irrate. I sent the Better Business Bureau a letter and I starting talking to my community about how I was treated. I also spoke to a construction attorney who was willing to take my case. I have taken the liberty of researching pool covers.There is a wide variety of pool covers ranging in price from S200 to 53.000. My main concern is simple and obvious which is protection for my pool while Ryland Homes will be . constructing their homes. I was very displeased and surprised at the lack of customer care I was given from the operator who answered the phone to the lack of communication from the VP of production. I plan on purchasing a pool cover before they stars excavation because I do not want to wait until they comply with my simply request or my pool gets damaged. I am informing the city of Rancho Cucamonga of this situation and possible illegal acts of Ryland Homes if dust control is not upheld during construction which is by code for building homes. I will further pursue legal actions if my pool is damaged from construction debris by Ryland Homes. Sincerely, Ehab Ateia • GRESHAM 1 SAVAGE ATTORNEYS AT LAW Donovan.CollienirGreshamSavage.com . San Bernardino Office (909)8904499 • fax(909)890-0687 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 12, 2011 JAN 1 2 2011 • RECEIVED - PLANNING VIA HAND DELIVERY VIA HAND DELIVERY Trang Huynh, P.E., C.B.O James Troyer, AICP Building & Safety Services Director Planning Director City of Rancho Cucamonga City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: 9670 Foothill Boulevard Demolition Permit-Commercial Dear Trang and James: • As you know, Lamar owns the property located at 9670 Foothill Boulevard. Situated on the property is the former Richfield Oil Station, built in approximately 1915, and designated by the City as a historic landmark. Up until this time, Lamar has respected the City's wishes and the requirements of the Historic Preservation Ordinance and has maintained the Richfield Oil Station in its original condition. On January•2, 2011, however, a torrential downpour hit Rancho Cucamonga, that resulted in portions of the structure and roof of the garage on the northern part of the property to collapse. On January 3, 2011, Lamar hosted a site visit with City representatives to determine the appropriate response. Lamar personnel indicated its desire to demolish the remainder of the garage, due to the inability to maintain it in a safe condition. Despite Lamar's request, in a January 4, 2011 email from Trang to Brian Smith, Trang indicated that only a debris/material removal permit would be issued for the roof and collapsed walls, and that the remaining front wall and the west side wall need to be "shored up" until the site has a definite plan or action is allowed by the Planning Department. Due to the amount of damage, even exercising its best efforts, Lamar cannot adequately secure the front and west side wall so that they do not pose a safety hazard. The only reasonable course of action is to demolish the unsafe structure. The City's present position impermissibly exposes Lamar to liability by mandating the property remain in an unsafe condition pending further review and presumably approval by the City. As you know from the site visit, the former Richfield Oil Station is in total disrepair. The front and sides of the building are gone and only a portion of ��/°° the structure remains. Lamar has secured the site with a chainlink fence, which we do 1pi/eG127- 7 RIVERSIDE 3750 University Avenue, Suite 250 • Riverside, California 92501 X100 C21G SAN BERNARDINO 550 East Hospitality Lane, Suite 300 • San Bernardino, California 92408 L.:754.15--60S(112.1 GreshamSavage.com G Trang Huynh,Building&Safety Services Director James Troyer,Planning Director City of Rancho Cucamonga January 12,2011 Page 2 not believe adequately prevents entry of unauthorized individuals. The building in its current state, poses a significant risk of injury to third parties despite Lamar's efforts to secure the site. As the property owner, Lamar faces significant liability exposure. Although certain methods of shoring up the remaining portions of the structure were evaluated, none would be effective in eliminating the hazardous conditions. Even if attempts are made to shore up the remaining portions of the structure, there is no guarantee that the substandard structure would be prevented from failing. At this point, timely demolition of the structure is the only way to eliminate the dangerous condition of the property. Communication with City staff suggests the reluctance to allow demolition of the remainder of the structures stems from the designation of the property under the City's Historic Preservation ordinance. Demolition permits are generally ministerial approvals, and even where historic landmarks are involved, the Building Official has authority to grant a demolition permit, without Planning or Historic Preservation Commission approval, if demolition is necessary to correct an unsafe condition. The Historic Preservation Ordinance does not prevent demolition in this instance, but actually provides authority to the Building Official to issue a demolition permit to correct an unsafe condition. Specifically, nothing in the Historic Preservation Ordinance prevents any measures of construction, alteration, removal, demolition or relocation necessary to correct the unsafe or dangerous conditions of any structure which has been declared unsafe or dangerous by the building official. While the Historic Preservation Commission generally must be informed, the Building Official may authorize the amount of repair or demolition necessary to correct an unsafe condition prior to the Commission's review. Thus, the Building Official has the authority pursuant to City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code § 2.24.150 to authorize the amount of demolition necessary to correct an unsafe condition. In any event, even if it were possible to satisfy the City's request, shoring up the remaining portions of the structure would not fulfill the intent of the Historic Preservation Ordinance. Historical landmarks are designated by finding the site has special aesthetic, cultural, architectural, or engineering interest or value of an historic nature. (Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code § 2.24.080) Any historic architectural and engineering significance this building may have had is now gone. At this point, Lamar requests immediate authorization to demolish the remaining portions of the south and west walls of the garage to eliminate the hazardous condition currently posed by the property. However, sensitive to the historical value Lt75-015-608032 I Trang Huynh,Building&Safety Services Director James Troyer,Planning Director • City of Rancho Cucamonga January 12,2011 Page 3 of the site, Lamar is amenable to allowing City officials to be present during demolition to point out any materials of historical value. Lamar will endeavor to salvage or preserve such items to the extent economically and physically feasible. Due to the urgency of the situation, we would like to discuss the matter with the City as soon as possible. Please contact me with any questions or if you require additional information. Very truly yours, Donovan C. Collier, of GRESHAM SAVAGE NOLAN &TILDEN, A Professional Corporation DCC:aes cc: Randy Straub Connor B. Eglin, Esq. Lou Munoz, Chairman, Planning Commission Frances Howdyshell, Vice Chairman, Planning Commission Ray Wimberly, Planning Commissioner Richard B. Fletcher, Planning Commissioner Francisco Oaxaca, Planning Commissioner L37S015--608032 I SIGN-IN SHEET HPC & PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 12, 2011 NAME COMPANY • d. . ADDRESS /���✓ yea, -✓ i2 lips / - £/Y'C- /; Z21rN2oJci2— r2e_C lt,/a_ v!i✓,97 C ce,70 es ?h2.10i -4,,5e