Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011/02/09 - Agenda Packet r • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 'lbw PLANNING COMMISSION 4 AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA FEBRUARY 9, 2011 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California II. CALL To'ORDER I Roll Call Chairman Munoz_ Vice Chairman Howdyshell Fletcher_ Wimberly _ Oaxaca _ IIII II. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS I A MEDIA PRESENTATION OF A DIGITAL SIMULATION OF ROUTE 66 IIII. APPROVAL OF MINUTES I January 26, 2011, Regular Meeting Minutes IIV. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2010-00971 -VERIZON WIRELESS - A request to add additional antennas to an existing wireless communication facility mounted on a ball field light standard at the Red Hill Community Park in the Open Space (OS) District at 7350 Vineyard Avenue - APN 0207-031-33. Planning Department staff has determined that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines as a Class 3 (CEQA Guidelines Section 15303) exemption which covers the installation of small new equipment and facilities in small structures. • 1 of 4 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA • Ls I FEBRUARY 9, 2011 RANCHO CUCAMONGA B. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2010-00502 - RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES -The design review of building elevations and detailed Site Plan for 31 single-family lots on 8.79 acres of land in the Mixed Use Low Medium Residential District (4-6 dwelling units per acre) in the Victoria Arbors Master Plan of the Victoria Community Plan, located on the northwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Long Meadow Drive. Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18449. On August 27, 2008, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18449. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration. C. DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2010-00724 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend Section 17.08.90,0.16 (Single-Family Development) by adding a general design guideline for single-story homes in new single-family developments within the Residential Development Districts. The project qualifies under State • CEQA Guideline Section 15061(b)(3) because the proposed amendment is to add a design guideline and will not result in an intensification of environmental impacts. • V. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the commission. Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda. VI. COMMISSION BUSINESS/COMMENTS VII. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. • 2 of 4 • , `evf PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA Lst FEBRUARY 9, 2011 RANCHO CUCAMONGA I, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on February 3, 2011, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. . i — If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, V please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION • The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position,you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda,you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The Planning Commission Secretary receives all such items. • 3 of 4 4 It PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA • �- FEBRUARY 9, 2011 RANCHO C tic kM ON GA AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,164 for maps and $2,273 for all other decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas and minutes can be found at http://www.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us • • • • 4 of 4 e. • Vicinity Map Planning Commission Meeting February 9 , 2011 ri y y E a o c 1 E v L E > 0. v = a` x x d w( iea U fili . l • (7® p IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII as 19th St` 6• a Base Line (A i f Base Line Church SI� I B ti \ —� p --��-f : Church oothill arvis1♦ r/f A f ��� m - Foothill Arrow 1 o c t c IV ;Arrow Jersey �v ; H l I > W R•8th / i Ili ° : L o d 11 16th N 6th r> a __ � .. 4th A 4th = _ lip Item C is Citywide * Meeting Location: . City Hall 10500 Civic Center Drive 47.94 1110 . STAFF REPORT PLANNING ii,-<ei: RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: February 9, 2011 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director • BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2010-00971 - VERIZON WIRELESS - A request to add additional antennas to an existing wireless communication facility mounted on a ball field light standard at the Red Hill Community Park in the Open Space (OS) District at 7350 Vineyard Avenue — APN: 0207-031-33. Planning Department staff has determined that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines as a Class 3 (CEQA Guidelines Section 15303) exemption, which covers the installation of small new equipment and facilities in small structures. SITE DESCRIPTION: • A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: Site - Red Hill Park — Open Space (OS)/Flood Control (FC) • North - Alta Loma High School (Across Base Line) South - Low Residential (L) — Existing Residence East - Low Residential (L)— Single-Family Residences West - Low Residential (L).— Single-Family Residences B. General Plan Designations: Project Site — Park • North - School South - Low Residential (L) East - Low Residential (L) West - Low Residential (L) • C. Site Characteristics: The existing wireless communication facility is located at Red Hill Park at the southwest corner of Vineyard Avenue and Base Line Road. The nearest residential dwelling unit is approximately 400 feet to the east. The existing equipment shelter is located approximately 200 feet north of the ball field light standard on which the antennas are mounted. ANALYSIS: A. Entitlement Requirement: The Development Code (Chapter 17.26 — Wireless Communication Facilities) states that all wireless communication facilities located on public property are considered Major Wireless Communication Facilities, which require the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. B. Project Description: The applicant proposes adding additional antennas to an existing wireless • communication facility that is mounted to a ball field light standard. The top of the existing facility is 69-feet by 1-inch high. The new antennas will be mounted under and over the existing antennas and will not raise the height of the existing facility. The antennas will be screened by a Item A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2010-00971 — VERIZON WIRELESS February 9, 2011 Page 2 cylindrical radio frequency transparent radome that is nearly identical in design to the existing • radome, except for being 4 inches wider. C. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee on January 18, 2011. They recommended approval by the Planning Commission as presented. D. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303, which covers the installation of new equipment in small structures. Because the project only involves adding additional antennas to an existing wireless communication facility, with no changes to the size or location of the existing equipment enclosure, staff concludes that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Director has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on his own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. Staff has not received any letters or phone calls expressing concern over the Conditional Use Permit application. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2010-00971 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions. • Respe ully submitted, 2. James . Troyer, AICP Planning Director • TV\ds Attachments: Exhibit A - Aerial Photograph of Site Exhibit B - Site Plan Exhibit C - Detailed Site Plan and Antenna Layout Plan Exhibit D - Architectural Elevations Exhibit E - Photographs of Existing Facility Exhibit F - Design Review Committee Action Agenda.Dated January 18, 2011 Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2010-00971 • A-2 io- IP' ' I Olg --, '''''-' .••••'.' 7 " • 14 - 111 Nal :.- 0 4 °e:1 • '' • , ..•"•-• 0 t • ,... w rj• 1 , c..., c., 0." • . 1' ' ' • : ' i r. r . . . .... 0.-- . i .,, .. 6 • ,..---- • * • - r ' , •••"? 'if '6 • . 3 ' f • ir • h ,'V I' • • x ",.• 1 i I. . . •11'1.t ;1\: • ..... . I :''• 4 i 407 -•••• 170 . I • •-• . 4-- • r 01 • i le 10 • 1 t 0 4-, rfs ' 4.•II" * I '--- '47, tO C .• vii 1 '. try"*" — 0 ..... x Lu or 4.. C.. 0 0 II , . 0- • ,... - ..- - O• Id) 413 II 0 CA 2 , • ... - , • CU < Z ,. .. , . t- • WI 4•41110 ) t FriiiirIMPnt j IPPir •-• le' A • a I •11 '/1. t . ■In 4....,•.„ , • it - : • ..., . 't...:,;,.• 11111 . $ t' i - ' 0 0 (N.1 % f U In .... U t U ,-.. t — . i)A;• 7.7.. • . ■'. .4, = 1:3 ' • • c r, . EXHIBIT A A - 3 . , , • I % , .--, i ' 1 i 1 o 0 . IIP _ 0 = b o .1; _ i < 11 M g U 0 1 VA 1 z IT i •=1 RI - / I, 1_ 4 ' i'ti [-] 13, ka 1 1 -. 44# g q) 1g/ g fg 'IL' I I, • I Hit! er /6 V-1 V t1 NO- al E 4°2 a I I ickj 1 1 ,T) 1 j ° - — , re . y i , , oil I . _ v ._ Li R i y VINEYARD AVENUE 1 / f r ---- --• 7- i __.-) :■_. 1 CKii 1 r, I 511 :.71 I ll : . - I : LItTi 1 " ■ I ,i il k i 1 , 1 ,k 1 . , : : 1 \ ------' -,---'2:-if • Ile 1 I H ■ : N:\ __________„ . et ■ 3 .,• . „ , ).- k \ ,, eq •-•-• rt-- : -- --,.. N /7f 47, I— - : i(OW I I I < I , I i i /chPl "“ 0 • / 7, Li 1 —- -L-1 41—L It— —--_J ,, ,r, 1 i , , ) 1 Q , ,1 ..._.., . .,, ..47,, \ \\ „) „ 0 , , .. -, . .,, ; . 1, .. 1, : a k ... . . \\ I ! ii : , , ,,,,, ! , --- , i I . \ , 1 1 . , 1 E .1 ill! 1 14 1 111, 1 ! igi t r i . 62P 1 i ilk §11 0 g6 i g i i g I g 1 t • a t - fr:all I VI" h 1 g in 11 lit 1 3_ Illi 11 li 1111111 WHIM O 8881D CHD ee ®e®Seeeee EXHIBIT B A-4 a Litz a E " i' ! H s - v fti ;6- r , I roaath i a '.. d $ rti• a l aiEg �-Wp 4 W � q a a E • I ►� p - -- q k }.. —T j ZA ?rub` j IIy - : :: - ____ / / i • rw £rrx C ;t / CM YAW AV7167:71711114 #CNLL�R y�v a Jv` g d 7 c31} .5 W N 1 I H p J a :i N. i I Q '. 1 S d,;• _ _ 1 tl OO o Q y 6 y .. ... "LT' r gl y d; ! E 1 $ la! 1 I 1 � g I0. it le ik it l ili i 11 i lR i 1010 / 1g �d; ik ; i ¢ HH1111f1IUdd1lHH1WW a 0 000 0000000 © 000000 © ® a • u Y R EX1 eIBIT C A_5 • N [II! Ur itt 1 g _ k I H I I n 99 V� yS ii l3 ttt r I 8 yttt 11 iii if 1; li iiii ��' t ;fk RI 1 � . � er_,i p •' i n -. t , N. lt i' Iiiyy y ; I 6I I I I 1 Ca' u +bg Iq y 114 I q p I .4 g F 0 S :S Ill Y B g ` U ig 2.i a7= 9iN e t L t Al l4> i. fiu ; ;II �ffp`11tH' I II':?P i a\ u I ,. / I' 1Qc a a— ili iii �\ �\ k�y'�etx ali 1 ClT i� +�1' c e:rh Rig 3 ', I� 1 y Ji at ilk 3 gy tiilug g \ rP "-5 S a: 0:-.-Ila � I O O • a :4 N W W 3 z EXHIBIT D A • • • • • ••—• •-•-• • 0 4 a i 1 1 1 i R 0 gl 4.0 _ 0 !I o _,„, g , ,25. i g f < VA V . 151! ibdi. u I Lit 1 i ..4`1 *1 r 2 I- v 1 E ;— E ET k Ni-i ` I ' N Igr 1 :Pi 2 1 Og kd ill I 0 0-1 1 ' LLI A E I w & i g ii 8 t 1 11 JO 1 111 1 il ! g lig i g 114 ,c2r, e i§ 1 ! 11 61i 1 il 11 iomilp,1 11 /11 1 1 1 h i inhilii 111 ! 11 11 4 li z.e 'Pe• litigNIP 4,' %,• re ktie•r A ..li';-,.. S.J' ; 11 hi ; 11 lit-- c'?..•, Y • 1'1 ' 41/44)=- :1.1 i 03 "1" ''' 40.417111?.?'•••;.ri-**-P5 \':IR 11 II: 1 \\\\,)ril 1 it 41 • Si'• .R11:WI ' i,\ ----1 n 1 ,C Y / f 1k!ffr I, a . a, 1, • . iiipoi .;„ : , 111 ..,.,‘,.: .t......, - _ . !lr-i="' -l-•‘• l- .-zlii-i E.V ",•fk:H 1"-'•`•-'•••• ?".1t---"'t:s.i:Ii k r --741111E ‘ I I ITFR,41; i irif 1 ', or, voW il t 11 i l l I ,t1 ,. ,3..t. '„,4•,;ei,;;;;;I: till:61.1 i 'PAStcatl ,.',..:t.i..4;srfr:,,ifrifth, 't •,:i \.(1., 1: i 1 ii 4 v 1 1 ! ap:Me, Fe1;41- itiNntAii-fic- .11111-11ukt-1 41 111 1-11 il1 41 1 I I -Qm,:i;s.k9,0*.."2,4heippfi 0 1 1 ifg 11 .11 1 11 11 1 w, 1.4. ( IA.,:iili 11 gi wl 1 v„ ! fp! 11 gi 1! : g. 1 I iil ! Irak E triics' 1 114 §! gi 1 i IP 1 g \tiMligii II:4 P PI P 0 ill 1 111 1 1 0 14 0 ill i 1 1 li 1 It ' L i Ii 1 !I ill 1 1 11 lir 111 11 irc b 1 " " 11 II 1 01 k 1 I I Pi cir Spa 1 j I g 6 .; , 1.= 4P 0 L. Li:, =Et g , A-7 J * ... f'711.1C411 • • L.11 -11P*11L %Mikl , , . . 1. ' i / " P.L.'/ .4 • Oplki /: 1 ..,,r ,t • i ...... .), , •-- .• . --. -"--"---• ii. •,..e4' .--- . .. . k :, _ : , '' ob.. -.1 _. . • e i•hikka; ',, 1 ri , . . .'%4:- - ':::. ":1-.:4 -' '=-:.:.. • . ':.. ...„..e..._-,ii : . ,:: „. . 1 . ...._ . • ILII!T 'P► . ti'‘':-.1.74 , 'tt-• r: _: r s lidik-ti! • ' `}f -s r�- }.; -tea i 11 / - ' i b1$ FIB' _ r S ` �1 I • r' r ., : s • ' Vo ft. . --..F's---r. . , .,- ,....., ., .. . atilt . .• . . 0 .. w v ` , +;rano IJ art ..3 L.*. it ro - v Y yr� 1 1 : 1 7 '''''' 1 ... EXHIBITE • -- . •: . ... or...... . ,. F-, .• IF- •:•,.• • ,.•.; 05,•'. il \ i•: .. •.,-. •• h •i rt . .-. r.. A •• . . . , 110110010110* . . . ,. . . . . . - ., ... _ •,... . ... ... ... . . r -... _IT....1r--.... ...lip=. ....... • • - !Pe. ... • . . -.iip,.... . ;Jr v-.4C . • . i . . • • •-10.'1.-4-4 . .... p, . . .. -..-7 .. .- .,..-t . ...,•. .....-•,.. - ... I . 4., . .,. 4.■ • V.. . •a brialli•••' - ... , , . ... . . .' . . . ..i.- . . . . . 4 . ...".•, Ar t . • ./Fr , • ■0..."- - . .....- . ,. .. . '-: •.. APIt . ..4".."• . • b. 1 .•. •'' -.• .V. '..' "-.4i.f.-..:. - -. .,...,„„ .-4- r, .. .... h. .... in t lop -10 -. - .,• • ., ....... • . . . . _. . lit, fl.t- .....-„, .. w. . ..-A. • . - ,..,, •••4: ,F:. •- •,„ •..vr, Amournow= I . . — _ I :410' ..,.."""•40116"--:. _ . - , ,.. .. a . .........."".' • ' , _g . , nili...„1 ... IV . i.• I 4 Ill , . NI' • ' . .." A iN ••••■ . , •...re I. . . /if\ \ \ /. \ •: . :,..., \.... .. \ '-:,•''.',,TL .1 ‘,4 N ......L. ,..r.j1'.. .. . ' Lk 101111.111111)111. . i \ .,. RESOLUTION NO. 11-05 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2010-00971 - A REQUEST TO ADD ADDITIONAL ANTENNAS TO AN EXISTING WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY MOUNTED ON A BALL FIELD LIGHT STANDARD AT RED HILL COMMUNITY PARK IN THE OPEN SPACE (OS) DISTRICT AT 7350 VINEYARD AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 0207-031-33. A. Recitals. 1. Verizon Wireless has filed an application for Conditional Use Permit DRC2010-00971,as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On February 9, 2011, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: • 1. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on February 9, 2011, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the Planning Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a wireless communication facility located at Red Hill Park, which is located at the southwest corner of Vineyard Avenue and Base Line Road; and b. The subject property is zoned Open Space (OP); and c. To the north is the Alta Loma High School which is zoned School (S); to the south and east are single-family residences that are zoned Low (L) Residential; and, to the west is an existing office building that is zoned Office Professional (OP); and d. The Development Code (Chapter 17.26 — Wireless Communication Facilities) states that all wireless communication facilities located on public property are considered Major Wireless Communication Facilities, which require the approval of a Conditional Use Permit; and e. The applicant proposes adding additional antennas to an existing wireless communication facility that is mounted to a ball field light standard. The top of the existing facility is 69-feet by 1-inch high. The new antennas will be mounted under and over the existing antennas and will not raise the height of the existing facility. The antennas will be screened by a cylindrical radio frequency transparent radome that is nearly identical in design to the existing radome, except • for being 4 inches wider; and f. The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee on January 18, 2011. They recommended approval by the Planning Commission as presented. A•10 PLANNING COMMISSIOIN RESOLUTION NO. 11-05 DRC2010-00971 —VERIZON WIRELESS February 9, 2011 Page 2 • 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above-referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, the Planning Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or the improvements in the vicinity; and c. The application,which contemplates operation of the proposed use,complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303, which covers the installation of new equipment in small structures. Because the project only involves adding additional antennas to an existing wireless communication facility,with no changes to the size or location of the existing equipment enclosure, staff concludes that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on his independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. • 5. Based upon the findings and the conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the Planning Commission hereby approves the application, subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department: 1) Approval is granted to add additional antennas to an existing wireless communication facility that is mounted to a ball field light standard fora site located at Red Hill Park at the southwest corner of Vineyard Avenue and Base Line Road —APN: 0207-031-33. 2) The equipment for the wireless communication facility shall be completely housed inside the existing equipment shelter. 3) The new radome shall be painted gray to match the existing light standard. 4) Print a copy of this Resolution of Approval on the plans when they are submitted for Plan Check. 5) The facility shall be maintained at all times,including making necessary repairs as needed, and keeping the site free from trash and debris. In no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. • 6) Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. A11 PLANNING COMMISSIOIN RESOLUTION NO. 11-05 DRC2010-00971 —VERIZON WIRELESS February 9, 2011 Page 3 • 7) All appurtenant equipment shall be maintained in good condition at all times. 8) No wireless telecommunications facility shall interfere with any public safety radio communications system including, but not limited to, the 800 MHz trunking system. The applicant shall comply with all FCC rules and regulations regarding the avoidance, mitigation, and abatement of any such interference. 9) The applicant shall obtain all the necessary permits from the Building and Safety Department. 10) Signs or advertising are not permitted on the wireless communication facility. 11) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code,State Fire Marshal's regulations,Conditions, Health Departments, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 6. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2011. • PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Luis Munoz, Jr., Chairman ATTEST: James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R. Troyer, AICP of the of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of February 2011. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: • NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • A.12 STAFF REPORT • PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: February 9, 2011 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2010-00502 - RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES - The design review of building elevations and detailed Site Plan for 31 single-family lots on 8.79 acres of land in the Mixed Use Low Medium Residential District (4-6 dwelling units per acre) in the Victoria Arbors Master Plan of the Victoria Community Plan, located on the northwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Long Meadow Drive. Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18449. On August 27, 2008, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18449. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Project Density: 4.59 dwelling units per acre • B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Wetlands and Single-Family Residential; Low-Medium Residential, Victoria Arbors Master Plan (4-6 dwelling units per acre) South - Long Meadow Drive and Single-Family Residential; Low-Medium Residential, Victoria Arbors Master Plan (4-10 dwelling units per acre) East - Victoria Park Lane and Single-Family Residential; Low-Medium Residential, Victoria Arbors Master Plan (4-6 dwelling units per acre) West - Victoria Arbors Park and existing wetlands C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Mixed Use North - Mixed Use South - Mixed Use East - Mixed Use West - Park D. Site Characteristics: The project site is located at the northwest corner of Victoria Park Place and Long Meadow Drive. The site is vacant, with no structures, and weeds covering the majority of the site. To the north and south are single-family dwelling units, to the east across the Victoria Park Lane are single-family dwelling units, and to the west are wetlands and Victoria Arbors Park. • Item B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2010-00502 — RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES February 9, 2011 Page 2 • ANALYSIS: General: On August 27, 2008, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18449 for the subdivision of 8.49 acres (gross) of land into 31 single-family residential lots within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan. The site was originally proposed to be utilized for a school, but the Etiwanda School District acquired another parcel nearby and relinquished this site. A Master Plan Amendment was approved by the City Council on December 3, 2008, to change the Victoria Arbors Master Plan land use designation from school to Mixed Use Single-Family Low- Medium Residential (4-6 dwelling units per acre) on 8.79 acres of vacant land. A Minor Exception DRC2007-00048 was also approved on August 27, 2008, to increase the height of the combination retaining/garden wall to 7-feet, 8-inches. This entitlement request is for the plotting and Development/Design Review of 31 homes on Tract 18449. The applicant is required to develop within substantial compliance with the Victoria Arbors Master Plan, incorporating the architecture and design details of the Victoria area. This request will complete the build of the Victoria Arbors Master Plan. Requirements include side-on garages, recessed garages, and the use of porches is highly recommended. The specific architectural styles shall include enough materials, elements, and details that reflect the character of the selected style. Design Parameters: The project site is located within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan, which has its own unique architectural design guidelines. The Victoria Arbors Master Plan requires that the • overall character reflect a Wine Country theme with influences from France and Italy, such as an English cottage or a bungalow style. The proposed homes are consistent with the required architectural styles and include Floor Plans that range from 2,449 square feet to 2,934 square feet. A total of 8 (25 percent) of the proposed house product will be single-story. The two-story plans have been designed with two floor plans and all the plans have three architectural styles. The proposed architectural styles are French Cottage, European Farm, and Bungalow. The French Cottage elevation incorporates horizontal siding at the gables with roof styles that have a combination of hip and gable, recessed windows, stone veneer wainscot, decorative shutters, and arched patio/garage/window openings. The European Farm design incorporates decorative shutters, horizontal siding at the gables, stone veneer, and 2-foot by 6-foot fascia with rafter tails. The Bungalow style incorporates horizontal siding, vertical siding at the gables, stone veneer wainscot, decorative shutters, and shake roof style with rafter tails. The other two roof styles use flat concrete tile. All four sides of all the homes have articulation and incorporate decorative garage doors to match the architectural style of the home. Each of the three plans feature covered porch entries, which range in size dependent upon the style. A. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Munoz, Wimberly, and Granger) reviewed the elevations on November 30, 2010. At that time the Committee stated that the project was deficient in the staggering of the product, meeting the 360 degree architecture requirement, meeting the side-on garage requirement and having 7 percent of the floor area utilized as porches or courtyards. The applicant was asked to make changes to the design and bring the project back to the Design Review Committee for review. The applicant • addressed the concerns that were detailed in the Design Review Comments and brought the B-2 • PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2010-00502 - RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES • February 9, 2011 Page 3 project back to the Design Review Committee on January 18, 2011. The Committee reviewed the revised plans and recommended approval to the Planning Commission with one minor alteration that has been included as a Condition of Approval. B. Technical Review and Grading Committees: The Technical Review and Grading Committees reviewed the project on November 30, 2010, and recommended approval. The project was returned to the Grading Committee on January 18, 2011, because of the changes that were made to the footprints of the houses after the November 30, 2010, Design Review Committee meeting. The project was again recommended for approval by this Committee. C. Neighborhood Meeting: The neighborhood meeting was not held until after this report was written. An oral summary of the meeting will be given at the Planning Commission meeting. • D. Environmental Assessment: On August 27, 2008, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18449. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. • RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review DRC2010-00502 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. Respectfully submitted, itYtZ6— 411V11 James R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT:SF\ds Attachments: Exhibit A - Site Utilization Map Exhibit B - Site Plan Exhibit C - Elevation Exhibit D - Floor Plans Exhibit E - Design Review Committee Action Comments, dated November 30, 2010 Exhibit F - Design Review Committee Action Comments, dated January 18, 2011 Draft Resolution of Approval for DRC2010-00502 • • B-3 • 3 33 015'1'70 u 0 .,--)--Ot E . Q • C1?, 'y271E1137; ; 1 :c umxibe3 Naw i 8ccoN --1• 2 ,7s1, - 17712 ZI-7Y.I.0§ 0 ■ I 7C'Li 1-±- I__w fili =Q z-: % '(-9) 1-6 • t VCPF (_)„ _, . E2 7,E_< t co 0 Wg 1--- co , th 0 1 i ___ __--0 0 if ii _-- A ' -..--t _ ; 1 --11r-C`lb: : -)---Li I-r)--- II if 7 '''.." 1 is IL 1----1 1 i ...-.-....--4 1,..-n:.;.,!..,..iFii 77 r-_--1 ir- 1-.-....-‘ 1 i- -I/ :-. , 4. i___ u 1 ..._-,j %. I I --1--_-r- . .111,.:1:;:ilit .:: 1 : 71 Ir- 1 II" """"i'D : ri QidilYIPEY E i -; ^ _ ____ II ti , r -- -clis---1 --,--41 in _-II in-- 4r_Tg 7--1-1 ‘.4‘‘ if ''■ -- OS no 11 ch-_Q-- Ln ..... 1----a&T.Ej ' 1 -..• 11 III _m,,W -9V5-- ---- ;,• ---. ' ■, -----1 - —r ---1111 --- i IA , L''=JitV . ± , - .__ a_i_____, . • ____ 0 A___gt___ it _=-2". ' ,WzY3 I- , :.... ‘ i•-, , .i 1__,- A , sa aa.a. :-:7----.-, a -- a -/--1- ogz j1 1 .- I-- „ . I ML-2- ■ ‘\ 4-e- -e: \ ‘ ; ‘.g.a-- a---ri,-;_j:=-A,:------ 4e-str-E--=- ---.. : t-r-i-7--1--7-------_ 4 ci---if--)51-.4,4 1 / 1 b tm_e-1-...5:05:47,\ \ . .■..,% ;...s..--,_ s.-:-..---__.„,_. ,., ..,i-_,---_- , , r,, , , — 111111 / I\ IL_f_4( ____•-•-ts_—_,___,„. (..1 , .,\ r_..,,,,Tros, ,.......,: . , . , , . / t4,. .. 1, !, 1, - 11 / 1 / 1 / 1 II ! )---- ---/D1961/1K 4./r ; \ 1,. **/4 '.:-- ..” I‘ . 1 / \. ' ' 1 41/.Ila ‘0D 1'1"-I"'''/''a•r•L. 1.--J.,a/,/-1,,./',--1_ ft--1 ,,,,,cT ______„„=„E________r_ „ ----.;,_,,,- , , , • • ,, , k ,, , , !/. I It:' : 7i 0 /-1-7_t__71,,,..„. o 1--7 I •-_- -=-----=-=,,==t--:---- , -/-4.-:`-,R, - '-'-, -,L : , n,/..--,“..\; ' ' .,,,, / 4,--1_tat -'2-4E.), 41/4 1 11 rrli---r-7– LS' 'it .11 • ; - a ;'I' k '..1/„//if 21 V II / i / t 1 -. 0%'..:•st:/,`,...,":.'4,1 ‘'N.,:...1„._.: Tr.°2- 1 i3 ,' , '. , ,5 i u,: =-m ' '.."."'" 1',./. 4 0, II 1 , . , 1 1 1 ,?. l';', 12\,/,'1/4,7:1/44:1,?1/4,, 1 ti, it, 1,1 I I i / '•%,, /C---17'''""4 I--J e..L...4 e_.1--t"--•■•/,‘-;'%,.,;".."'Irs I I L.I7.:Cg JIst.,•`•.•-•1;;Isj--:RjW 1 II '' ' it lir.--Hi a Ill - i -i ::/ V I''-., Zili 1 \--------=— _ ...: , •:,..I) I' '.,i1 !Jr- Its Lit---ii--,,,,,,,,,,# i ,, ,,,_1'''''‘) it _.,/_-1143/ 1,l' . fit?' •\■,\VI' .. '"'7)::;ill:1 I ' . I'' CI'"IV., 4- I JOS-- 3:in'/7 1 111 11 1 1 ; 1 (1,- . 1,,,1Q:1%,`, :1 ,,'',,, .',\,; -", 1, ;1-0. 7 ' ' t, " Hr.,—–' I Ii , cL'a–/ ' iir ',if/ ' V/ I I ‘ ni /0 /7* ,t1V: _ I-: c ' 0+\\ ,.. ' ..-,ti.'II-i5 ( , .I r . , ,N__..m . ,,5 kL.c,.. ,fri 1 0 I I ‘I----01 III L 2g2..._,-- 1/ 11/2---HI. 11, ‘ : ", ,, c. ""...:,./C. -.11/ / ' 7 ' ,1,1c--‘11/1 /I __I 'lig ''..-..." . /// I 4, -A- -N,f__"1 H1----,1,:4,-1 411T-:r .'ig,',1\ \ )'..,,t:•' ' I'I.::'' ': '.-. :1 I',.... ':-. -''. '.. .. : t :g lir-_r__, , 1111 to / 1 1 1 ‘ in It jm10 ,z i --4 , ,- - "I- 'ip I 1/4 1 If, Pi —I-89, ■t- - ,.' : ' -; -,:; ,:!. :; . -,r;ir,s ir 1 r ii / ti 'io - II- IIL---I 1 . ^ 1 il / l'7 .../.';': "\ \' '4r.‘-'1.1„,,Fs_ccli . . :iri;-11 :II_ =-In 111 1 / '.,//1 / iv c--- %°\0\‘\i-,',- *,_\:',:tc,' 5;;.',..`'Ec'El ' ' ; ii":11 litk- ,1: 14.c..., ■• -ifil i tt i 5,, • . --- , .1,-..-2_,, ___N\ 1--T V \V/ N".--" -'-'1.''/.S'‘...."' NI\ 1.,J- --''''';' 'c.v.. 1'" , . , /1 II 1 --Jano'c .- /p_DEL-44a / 11,1 1 /0 - --II fill I i. \''' -"N.'■,.-.'"'---V.\ \\C--..:1'‘‘,/:I7 7/... -I/ill , - ,,-• , , , )0 /1 ,( ,-,__i_- \%- , A ..4, kt‘ '1 .'...'__ .,,Q5 , V :x..kill_III, 1, 1 I I I 1 : 7 11 i III __-4\ —51S1V ‘,., \* -v.-. ),..-..-C-- 1\1 I‘IL--...-7\IV iliCri...,;.''' ' • ,44=fr„fr,7_7 7 1 \ I) --. ..1- -. 1-----1--T-i-4- T T 7, R I . , I 1 , ,,,,,,„, HI , 1 „ , ... ,, , I , ,.. E k r r-- f 1 1 1 --1,-_- o 1 I 1 ,,, I I 1 k , 1,0 11 vq)-• /..J-.A.e-4••/ 1"I 110 I 115 ... \ EXHIBIT - A BRIGHTON - RANCHO CUCAMONGA so TRACT NO. 18449 SITE PLAN j \ ® .. ' — ' e IS11NG ♦ ` vA•AV� a AREA ---___>-iiv / .. S 1 4 4\ \ \i. ° ' \,\,' ,./ '----4.' i \. a‘ 4 \ \\ C i EXISTING I '� � \\,,,„,,k A ' WETLANDS \ \I `,\L AREA �;r Q IL 114 It\ \\\\ _. y� n �\��1111(a ; :rimin 111111/411fflonamilb tirwar_____-- ' ■■■ \ 7 Luc 1/ I1 I��! � �ri ` �ia ri ',Ill,I' \ i. i m .� I : flNZ1kt*,r.,:n.,,,i. pc, mqrs or ii litip,m- -0 x , . a j ____ iseaso , jil I l_ F� -1 i 1 ' I I N T TO SCALE EXHIBIT - B B-5 ZOSOO-OIOL000 - 1tlt.11W606 0361A313 DUG ()NZ- 31/90/l0 - BIIOIOL / m0 i•.g-; 1 ,la'.. ; 02¢ C', w^ rp_ O 53NOH Ntl OI X 3 Ntl so?, . i OOO yi 12>< N • . I;' ,SLg. arm N w2- i ¢¢ /. 3.i 8 j 4d44� ¢ w • }} m rlYy, 3M v. II 11 11 '•ev ig t [y. " 'aidsiFf i '3a •. 11 ki ,f-i 4 al •t ter, rile#d . iQ ®GL s ►Aa I % „_ �� III GIL d y 0 „H EE � , :et: '.i +'L q� ,, i wYor, �a 3` 7a '' , �� rt'.4,",:-.:=,''''''''a+x 1, $11/ WI ehlwrii. . k44,4 'tri E'il Ili ly ,f . +4 4 • 114 ft" 1mii AII,��z.�II ,"' e f i.f Iro ".,4404.g,/k . I� O �HI Ii y J1¢,� • Ili rc + ryl° I�il . rill �Nr�IF m 5 � w . �� BEry r.L v § t tl i ICC , - lux. i, ' • pi i n� Y I'Vii," A7-7, `2 R mt, U -a' akul . I G - pi sl mp - r¢e r - -J io i 4Mp1 i c $ ; "Ir Yk.• re c _: d4? >}& v :b , . J o i. . Jz id 1x: c li _S o.1;"N. >�s�xri 1115b3° Ia 4 I k . T71 V. — 117 : ! l Y1 r Ir Ez2 7 Jn ,tro i i�� v _� Z sW ill 41 i ttr ea 4 ✓ m `L,; k���es— ,•',„ 11 TM ¶!!IhLLi7¢I € o a Jr r3 r g 1� l ua a r�; ✓Jf 7 h 61:a, 1,' t�°'rs' x ,, t a z .. �� e A, p Q y P �w� ppy���, ry "Ik'''- J I Il�l 1i sy„ -B 1 ,I £7al�g 7 z RI;.`„1 i qt. . , `i' ' 4 1 IyLL f r in ,? cowry g,=0 '1 pY1�41vpl ,"--la /1 1,, ,, q 1 azn ,g fl I v t �i•Elk •i,. r r-� t o t; / i/ lt'l it�i .■�r I y rpS t , h ,�^yz qq il!f � v sex '. g-Pl�l��� t I� 4r, ry$ 11 IAI x r .„ , 2.' •l kil'� wd �� z # ,�, j•e. : :i ;a EiYW z,., • - Cj�II d ih f:`.",lu- :Yh. is,fR4':. /}Lz,i,:45.,.-r'=P 'ta r4 55. Y g; ', V, 1 ...c..1„=_,,,,95:' l'�gr4 �'.,RE'i 111 PI1i}'u"Pri,'. (" j-;11 7 gEy4 9 a !,t 4 ray E ac ll�l: C v} r � f$&hi-4! SE11P�l1Fill!!!1 s S $w: i �.4 dpi y (gyp, :' 'h,4 . i y, p :61[pI0. i N6 ge .2- ( RVVV M un uJ i .„,,,i- °59 dP j a • `� Gq q ! g a 3S= ggF "r ra Jf t r lTi Nli k L r, w a S o EXHIBIT ,,, -, , >, $,{I, - =sns3 g`� B-6 Z0000-010ZJN0 - lYI➢IN"OB O38IA3tl 0ua ONZ- U/0040 - BLIOLOZ rIIgI'¢MI a1 WRY rw,"rwr S° .e j N 0 v....aa,as ., 3'� 3-F a C7 'nil" tIrll !.. !.I SaN C w' SSO 53NOM Ntl JItl3Ntl ,,, -:r ! OQ¢ i3 00a T a iJ Iy ¢ V O_ _ •� t/ J {i d 11QBld1,di d 6 a i v i F U A • 19%.42luIPII"k IIuMO .; S F G � j3it ~ Ira p 'Oil 11- IL O 2 4 IY CIr ! J ra di l F v � faill - I Pi, Ilp t � e Oa °I 7i- 1 �y _w_ 1 : l I ryC �,II yr A � I49 � T. yl 17‘,d...'41 J iqs 101::.1,„,r v ft I.d'4.-.1 u;{It"2 er e ik � u YG I �{ ra°� I >t i T aa mpP1 ie Yr-" to g5 l 'IL I �iI1a T 4 ea ��ijrul '4titia, 1pl''ap7 j IY111� 1r 15 '` 1 a cf tl � 11 I /III brrik'E,/:I,1 'd--P Il 22M)2 ,q x � a Ago �I�� Q! i N' a (I-. r4il1 I. �il i "diet 1 `I en .i i; 11 olii �hnI:.aPai4k`nik:�i ,I, n0tIC _ R •°`.22.1 i r'�"".. Q, _a ep R",�St JIM L 1 ter �I I ,, .KI I7 ::I .11G'11 1 d 40l r tl"ox 1 1 .{4-1 - lya�' sal°IJ 11r5} `tL NSia a r; r L pe 1$ 41,-1Z1G" \'t tbkyc 41 � '5 i it• l ��°"III L r �.- � �°a net I u ifri i1 u iter 1 f h1U 45n s1 ■ f7 i a '1c "die "� 10 iPfr" ,1�t t,�r�,>r R➢ �f�—r{��1.�L ifi � _ %aI°yAk rail f $Sf. Ini'tlie nfi0 �X 1 1 I 1 N�I� heIu 7 1 1tp1lA Y , 'ILI I H9 1111] §§ ®I➢pi`gPn o #li Y t ntj,,,Dh: Y II `' # i I. �'i,� k L Ar,rEba% 1fiF pi tit Is °' IT1.1�` iT .t i"< I,\ 173 1 n Ilnvlgk t1 ��I Id N P _� A 1.' I12I �st« I a ° • Gta'0'l9"rr MA,..i 145e °a :',$.1:4414' 4. 1 .IW ' "P :F.41:::,13 v on '"i=, r IIL a51 sr13 rill tl LiR 4 -2J y JJ9, L 1 r ti a ;24-222,2 M.4 ^ aVer •J° n T-1 tt 41 ;IG6%q 1 h ..5 a96 a xr l a ° IpWSI d a b 1d ti 20q p t r t 112,du.il 2 It I ! I 21 7 rv^ " a i 1 ir,8 I ■■ C I1� ° I NU I 11.1 IV a �1 11 I1ir1 *, h i �In-I UJ qq� p Q p ' Atli q 1114 es 7I- 4{Atli �Iv. !1 ',lye/him�V1. �Ie'1 iii. �,t� iti " ! 1"as :t/ Ii lid i I °6I IIIIMa<t�hp �. 7r2tl PP? i 4+Q1 1 p % y) �I;e E,`.�.23, v1!'�t1 itaan wig"" a+v iI ,° 4 tr,i R1 e44 It nrFk! $ 72. 11d/F,pb l� r I°k �y 1 `r no ' e Y In11CP4.1 i1y ! I ■ -4 a It 3 - 11;;;.",/ 1d b� 1 f ��1 a a w y 6 �' i60 °ML 1.-re r p s V' €€ 1 §� �t4"�Lr 1AaaJ3 sCa I's N F U ..§ dell.. 1 n r. 'IH.S1 9F Br ° / rn ii: 4: Y'$ 144 l GI t 1 d gcYk23E ir• lrint Lu - .-- 33 e�� F 111 � .a E g i ns I tr„..N mE V g� ¢g E g4A s�,�yy��, zzY.�� `` i S ILEj 4$1r33g'iY5n3 ,trail; �x;.4'hi'�.*''41 IF, e°CI, B-7 20500-010ZON0 - immune 03SIA3tl Otl0 UNZ- t1/00140 - 9401OZ 4q[-[M 4W1 nl/WR LM LLp51.1�6�IPJ t $ .11g2 f ' I rrvonn I a0 0 w� pa < y 53WOH Ntl ° IU 3 Wtl ,, a rirI51 j # -i5 OOO N ='z n¢ s A 1\ �-t `f I f']S]1 iu¢ p. w g aOa • �0 �� 2f .,. I, pp f e s7 7 gs k (n ?3r,' TT w W" Q s.t. d d�d4a m 2t S W I9y1 II !PIInN INK ' 0 OZ LL Z tkri W Z 41‘,.. I 7 O 1]Ij Y S N jpt d�ti I I a' It� dgxiit�:o- x � dC1 Illy +Itlxrvh ;lid t� � f rA iSl Id —eye '1 1 irvli Et ie�ilf/' s ti j s ' leaIr 71 ''I 1 I-, I d nNj r a fIIg� i 4l 593 ��{{0� I� t: ll/ r $ 4.la t bll 1tI=_ d jl td1 Nl,y �;. 4 )1:'," tl i�(� I IT 1 t d F rka.,.1,1,, ±,41 ; �, Us I P�,' pu 0 � rl th P v 1j 1t- <°� {jm7fit I ;: {A Y I [ r tileneI�u, S! 11411'11'm / Ili Yr Ilk,9 t MINN l tell y: rl ��( '� J t i f x 66.•,21 .--i� 4 {}I lefrkun; f 3i 42tt1;1�1�;, 111, gWSr4// I n '! , „..I,I - 1vit� rlEtl T9I i i. I " gm, I I i l , „ m -cif- IL'1 a pia Aklr a t 0R IMg t;* 3 p{ , t,,I, i' r 7 4,i ats tr45 u 3 ®R F i t 'i Ar. g 4�` ' ader :="xl a.-. ' ;. �£ r al +. ,�”, Ra erl4 �i i t, 1k ',..f'T rr Jf 9 - P --IF, ir'a\ ��4°'` I,; p �kiJ Pr I' &y�yj r t r ?: t: �iita a b 'w r1 ' �p� i�' / ,7 r4 dat�.4'Q 1 &i.�uU �i" {tl,.:i 9iM IOrs-. 1\ L ✓I a , E tx a' tix�Ir 1 t Ft:m� fin¢ 1 :`-#. ,, IIG xrid� "ceell°"°''bh+i < t . '! Sgt % Tt,4 P❑tII i, t ",, a' 2: \ 1y � tTivSmP� 914�Y sl ill, a� " t {� nty'yi o sR�`!S a k li i�§�,�±t to t 1.4 if nudj >4 '+.ei R�I ' �» tb` dr ' py1,1 ,ttlI1 Hill- 1 7 14T�M ��II II iCl ,A Y s�� i I t 4" ;3"!'"i AEI \l a (( t IN; L,„ q �"•, 5∎.P.' "3) q t ZG! �N; klie tl -,- 1 ' 1 r✓4tll 5r I i & tl E IitGOr y FxY1'� .., ) CC yi I .. ,111.1“i A p lktr 4 r tt j r 111 �� I � I tl I r r'I U� 2: 1^�unr,Nry s'?r r 1;# 1 W � s. . ! L . .i e jl 4 R p; e r I r , )� rtl:'k 1 { 111 i �a n Of { tt" �fr a PI4 , I' 11.1.19 P9uP r - `" ■ , mh I�➢i I .. 1�4,i, 4 I ' !p � � lu�a5gn�t1 ■■B{ d s I� j 011 LIP 1ilo- �d S�4t.p 1u�b"' a @c ! IP551II ��ralllt i� PVIB � dlt° {° �u f{, n c0 ,11u . .. .. m_ ,� N l�3 4A r1 NPI in1"11l : mtM{ YY 11_. i 'r 9 R"k�Ml W �mtln I lfl �I IY -1eb ..r.x °�Oip� 7H j e h n 2 1e49 4,,15 9 &e�t 'l„ 5 Lt f n w� 3 rq :"sp K1 > x� 4 ' Oc y n' A. oI saii SSIIR✓ 22 f a O ag n; tr �'v"lsrl f i""1: } aLiJ ss h IIP'rA 1,iat4 9 {�n , e q¢ 45-1741S51Y L n E E s''g l5 W$ 12,4.P,,p7plk\1 i ... n p RH AnLgF� a� t ll !F32 rig Snc Sul`=' 'I '1,-1 s !1 t 4' W • Z _ ; zs "'F° 1511 5-1U, nib lfin31) NE E ca Yt ! s gy . ¢ a 15415-'1.'1'I!I r m. sA W l@ ;NIP,. :, -:_ :o B-8 ZOB00-OtOZObO '1V111WB(16 03SIA3tl Otl0 ONZ- U/BO/{O - BUOtOZ IOR-MWNo 1119W-on on'um 4W awalfi e? T] 1J{° t ° a F 53W ON N OItl 3 Ntl ��. T �' 3 11 II _ 1-1-m M 2 6 F q i N 3 !!!!1111 ZUR N to I Q �� r" s< m d lin 41 1 .14..50:14,.!1:1 m t 4 1481x0 W BBIPIPIA IIrJNA ,C-,Al LL H _ w 2 t K 't l" O �psr� 1 ,�E��99� 'III ,� /IQ meueseuusee 0 Tit 'j{1,,I:'�1 ¢ o IA,It.!. I .I._ 18 O� Q y °I CeP (aA se la x t.Aqa'', I , �1� ���„ a_,ff, ,31 8, ILL In°4' � �< i�A3 1sgc r i 13;47 p,�in cc e6iSj,1� I� i IiI11'��, 1` r` 4Baf1d�. g O�L�uL �Bi ti h, �� t A I' ��11 �1 !A, OOk 8u�I x. o st illi i _Ai di �}L "Is �f >� F`I+ Ill' r; �a ° -rhyti° p :FEW' ' _ , ° j" 1141 slit 1tl S xva tth ' er p1 ill ! I h !` ' � , � t li,„ 4, `�7� N,' B ( vie lr-l •� �! 11_ flji [BAy �ll�4''I 9 � � �," !d k P 'Ifli� r t1 , ��g11 II,rill IV Fri,n ° �[ Ise fa' I I *'. ' t �� r : IS iGj 11 ry W 't. i¢ 'e ! ' !Ie , ( r, 'tf{c . xl x a '� r�. a fv R ", a 11 ` � ,ii, tr a © n IR 4h1° F,'''s InA ,I9 ,9 i tin 4'o,,,e jA,.,pG; r h5 l�. 1r, t "� / ifroirg"gs 1, zrx _.,„! �, t∎ I, : r _. qy Il�I I!' Q IEjt l -- 1004.6 r ” Bfit irg� ' � PPi I W g - gyr.t�yt' 6 ti I s °I Ipfry ,-�AIB ! 1 '9)j1 1 CC 1 A WY K- ".. lISUe k .✓f l 1� p'rilg ul I I� 1 tint 9 I�,, I'�l` ' ht'''",u2 r jB � i1t sEi �'{ i�0'pg� q 5 ' 1, gtli r'd 1TITJ'a r' 2p� '�. _� �W An L.ARit r t`1 i1 �Wi' IG® q PNgti1tt1 ' pl, ), x ; �s6U96 �1 a It,rthounr,i;-w $ AaJC( ; J I E N ., 5 8 - IdpuhA4EaipI K[ `t Et {3 B 1: ( 'o o cc a s ,1A;Irgl.uns�euswIEl s z o § €P 9 Ipg;SRyuO .-igp, RP Peg 6a goo 4e,qurht�} 1 j' aB Te$ W v.j b. i I z x��W tsoB,xwili, IPA e E • S IIBr 111 F r9 w�- S c Ig9ga0ri61 i-.1,,• Jr - tea agsz I '7ndr' i. �IVIWiil y� �a xEi i B-9 1 LOS00-OlOtOtl0 - 1Y111WSfIS 03SIA3U 3U0 ONL- 11/80/t0 - 8110/102 IWi n1 bW^i/Yc -mb 'aceyw'w U' :IIi�,S N 6. vwlelvv0 i 6 ,1 <<N O) T ry I--O S3WOH �N/V ttH3WW V ' Y. °. ) :/ 1 SS Ica U}' mI 0¢ �IOUW'RI °St �y''l ' t :6 I w f LL� F as f • E:� 8 t deddd m 2r f w E .'rx*' , i,i It r ° 1 4{qn ,a \. J4y :4- a . a.t, ,'--.-9,1cla n .+. ac,'. K d 1/24Iir a / i, " a: 1 11 / ' 2)v?. M1. r- sI iirdi ! 5i i 'npryt1 II C�m'I Y .1" -Tel III�YII I (I `111:. F/ k 1[6'11 J Lr tt u� li tt, �:- ,s \ 4r 111' !4-, n4�1'111111111 -, .4.,��4, ra1��. _ '+/.. y - /7t c .. n, fii� ` r IA �\ i9 t Ai ��� 41i"� k� €Few r p r1 yto �.a Ipp I .( AY'�\n { ° t a7'a� ✓va�1\� S ". e' i , J f M ); h r„i 4 , zt . t5 M1P ? ` 1 ;y �`,st���0�1 ,„nI ill l.1 §22 JUG F aF gS #ZS� '� 1&IRN .ItLa ) ( f ! tIlits ' Y?7- 1I H.: ,i a 4pm x3 xe ti•,,,, ri1sg i-ii`iI A.--I- os7g� - v l Gnu IIn� � nf9 L a3 $ €°a2 , n fir. u,sE },' > 'A9S "��► 'It1 J w8$ 9os� '��y�� Jp 7 yy SE 2 1, i,)`) Wl4 E1 1l f 4 c I-r °16il�ly� �I �3 �2 �`. V n qp • tlt4 "^ y• fR�.-:-,-ia 44,,,,,,,„...1.,.,; , h"$ 333 I I vy I"' F; �,a'" nl "�°�If"a5� .". t5:.. i7P `� �1& x,11 � ^Ir /�' q nllt z sq €cs 8 �4i` i " bG?l 1 al Il�Yi a rye 1"- tic,' l r I•I Y TiI#yYl { m R. s�n ,h�il i� �,u�� >3 xr,� ��� tT{����11 y h, iirgi 4/�V'il'Oi‘ ,... • �rL NB$1 °.f1 1 ����I $1` tRl <Y ri:cam 0.j I£ ( gip 4 ,�M i°^p l u f' �4 'x°'4Jyy'5ry tqa a e � , ,14, 1,1 ''Y7y g. ; 1 'o I �� t % gig i Y1 l.� tFS`> '2< ^a, �,«, I B Py gg 15 °"li'�yt,.2�'"1" \ a5?y. 1' 1..0111 357a' �,,na- f'' '� z '� a-L"3a {� z,>. 9lr i c"'�'ra tµ �i :CF ;1 0, p s OW €o ki f ,� �, , }. 1 xx ��tllvli� _S w. .'". WK °4T ' t 'a^1;:::”^-2‘'v 1 �a . i zt- 10 : .c-1 xVI!`ait c� }� � ''" I�LLrIEY k-'Lk t.:!..:;;••p ' ''x^'s'TT.i. ,.... [5 is 1,3 I' ' .'ca' 'le 1 1;,--11:- r •og3085gveilli n-�S'.I •eB n 8:i.v_ 1r. { ,i imetc`.L.5--:`? . 11 `{ Fhr V . ; z aSy �' ui>d i' p° I■ �� 1 kp'� Iii ' . k,1p1,:gM11: 'l 1 r1SEn-:"k.:: LLsz3z 5 � '� �5 4!r! � �' 16raL �i7ci N: 'til , �'� / 1 i� �• ��'' �� nop 1/.' 1 I� 1T p [» , \ .p5p5pp nn ,Eti 111�ttdNltF ill �'1 in 1111 a° .'a �� 4 p� S` ,1 p'�\_gill 4 t h a 3H 9e ritlli y e ,II 9Ebi sia-' cat g 5) I WililwnplaSl�i c51',18 H X11 Ro rtq a 6p4 Ifl� N ! V i .1e�-i11��;11 7'�d Y' 31es L '& i6_� PI lifi g ugh.'1's. j�'I is.! 1as Il� r r z 122 oa]Z i S y 1b °it t.t it - e [k'pd'1'.�. 1 z If:9' 7 ��dt5 E1 lTlli, "' a • liE > 11 �' 1r 11i I l- #A�1 ¢ ' fl W [ 7 �, 11,4,,,;.,,t.:1;51 ' is Kly,Iw. � o%n Bs� Y�. s c��il fl , p-a w B-10 ZOS00'0I02080 - 1V111WBOB 03SIA3tl DUO OW- LL/130/l0 - Bll OlOZ ilime-n—.r:.°we-m nw 4fl r.�.T ,-::. � _ < 0 ha yl.may.ur.r •Nlolli3 Ir i d Q 6 y O >N 2 Z w ; I �¢¢ wi OOa r SEWOH NV ol ^tl�3Htl i'l' ,� f 31]7 ggm N I; 2 ''.5" V I aeaaa b w I I— z I p °;y ui+1 C '':'''."1 I 121 'Pri irsti:,knArilitil-1*.r4ft I_ ism c.: t,x",S«g;1; 1♦A�'tic.,:, 0 y pi pn aPIPI1PH IIti cI ti;[:: 1 I 'r ,� �I '- CL 6 SZ� xFi�p'v phl al Bite h ril P WI-91 �`Pib+ 1°H tl� I t- , ft";'.4ft l `�� �lOn fur J4TP!5j liin6 t �tfRtin ACC 1�� Hi l°' rtl.l 5 z`.4`'Y t2 lc r x .-s.. x s }} -1 91 sB& ..° 'e -J' Si i. rl y� 1' -1:110 i ltl 5 ua1 I f < sr c h i I'r yFp'I Rf� I LW;-"I Ogiil;�p fir♦ ° � 4 ' t [ I {�1, E a ° -1 ^F I T -4-> �S F G'°S eu e : L 1111. 1p(floa hp' I � k 11/40-'.. l� 1 a I it s kx =x d. au P a, I: b 3& csi 7t*� 1 3133 `rl tldtil`+ k o a b� •uuu A � It� +31 ° c itglg ;V AI 3y wpp Fr" gE • Ead 4 .` ,- I Lit; h. t n geg 4� }a 21 �t� to y.a 5.�' ,.W h sa :6�a9 :`^ ,lpA. auut ss= !Rom ``"��,x`� �� li o }x • as 7 n1..1,. eta 7:1 as 1 °{ul 'yyg �.v1 i. o S lk�r �i n II}Lk'S A38r,i *e`;p:-. ``t ¢Vti ,t+.Il > x Fria ;go qg ' oGl-u � ctCS F. R. °s B IfRI 1 ' fop 4l� ? C al -, iK gersk "" !MMO/ Q ..� G4.A I P`:i . e 3 51 zn ttv ! r. :hiL d < gi CIP Ya • -, A IPII�1 C hfi� Y 11, I t,.1,1 �f l z a� €li o • B.11 Z0900 OLOZOHO - 1Y111%611S 03SIA3p 000 0N2- 8190/10 - 9LIOLOL rriVr m. w IC:O yy f';I. S i t Z 6 2 W`V O V s T `v + ! .II OOD Z F 53NOH NVO1U3NV ..•\. ;...y.. '� fi]5 _ 'i,-00 N tto_i A <Rc. N /-� /� ^��r 3 3 In 3 lug Q V VOI HADRI ;It 1"!i A i dada! m < 1 f <R 1 w I • w J 6 U q N lit t am t. i �u 11 ��k E I iC CC ¢ 1 Y 1 '1' n1 F w LL ti 11 ,r raf pt �Ng . i Jr. hr.t. lit-2:: 4-,4.4, f ��� .< W `' �triwx'*r1 to 9 l IJ 141; I, w 3 nr`n' nu t ii- Rlf - RP fY- M'�9k -, }! /IR,�I aj ■ EAR It p ;� R :,'-on,;",,,---, Y319� r J 3* # 'j I p W ni .fr LY4. dti / eggi t t1 ' i -- P' �F �I 11 'it 0 Ex,T4 I tIR 4e �,`: Y It littli mil E6 no I .1_1.-" 'A ' i'� �.• 'b pap t; a 1t 'dr1�rEll limb lit IifittIP, 447§- f f. 1 ),." s'Ktm1f it&'ItEj f 'fF ' a U �P�' ql I lily Mist �t j?. } eR . I 4};'G.eyr "a a . . 7,d� -- 8 lRp no oe1t579 =-. �_ 4` INN t e fih ft.Ao ia-;a i'ipit-n7',w '41 'ytxe§t9 ySG, pl� �,' : LIE Pr' ?i' +44a.++.. .1 I F\ br�' 1�(�+�i%%. �t iti .a �� gel i 5-�' i' Y 1, 42y141111 �IIII ,�k G -Fl 'r}S IJ' MI'4 tllfr 6G $ern. 14- 1 '''vvv - E ' I I • B-12 ZOS00-010Z0110 - 1V111WB06 0361A311 Oda ONZ- ll/BOND - 011010Z • WR-nt 4N vi 1,OTt-f�WO ORY°min"wt , 't 6 i = i F -t_ wY� �1 m>IAip �• 11111 aaNr }N Z O O O �' is �Wa¢N pp `aoa, 1 W 3 a a ! 0 I m . ss i 6 w • 0 v ai a o N if1 A R I � ti Q&D go i t t- r J i 0 14ApA8BIP110811t1 AA Z it li� Eta cc 1. 'r(l In Ili 1 1 r u_ r e n 1 ril t•p 11 -1[i3 {� � 4 �� (1 411, 1/ �� I ° A4y4�' ti �•• il 009,7.,-yFi-ir•,,-,i A• I R / t • rt icy an a i.e\l'il @ l 1( m -1 y1 'I I 0s j III. I . •oil:(wh f y A 1' iim ' , 1011 1'1A E I : : • 1484a�A � L !, u1 d1 '_- ap rt( F P r E ibi 0LL�• f ' ¢ u Rita r ��� �R I 1. I iax !dip- ( 1 s I( P r It... •"" it �°g ANA --5. A lia'. r i€::. a aI `'.. n „3 ,; ` A !final i as a l ii 15 f rr�4T li,.w`ry ° •R 14 �� z §°ae»» vacs Ic, oil ` a 1, I •1' O o 195i"i111. ti ., " $? 4€ • • B-13 20500ii.O10d0tl0 - 1V111NSfiS 03SIA3:0KI 0N3- IL/9O/l0 - 6/IOLOZ iwl r..u.w Of r we won rer nae .,,,nam•. +; + f.i.3 h F < ' � `? .R a:to . R a f.) e1 -C Tr T N 0¢ N 53HOH Ntl 71b 3Htl .04;„ F°'I• it 000 �' Wi r.SQ VA� ✓� 'JU 1is � Iha1l >< 1 � d<° pp ww [ Q • C tE ccm m f d w R 0 YJ Z J I ` U N h ,i, ','14, r1t/:!r 1 jk p Q f t cc UJ j 4' X60 �V 1t CC IR a r x t- ! 111 iM l a �.;1 w1!� "& e " ¢ si 'Vali tfr ii .114.401, dm iiiitalatM OH • 1. I.a 64S JS f 4 FM ry p a 4 1E:Sra.� I r�/g15f� J'/�t i�Q6l ��p 9901 I iI ” u lij l¢ d Ci¢ 1p - , �'� 'S'9 lib FID;in 101 B Ic. TiI li'4 Sall pp's 69¢ i A 96I, 7� v„d4 II I L,1�-, f'�{1! �b h �r�a, �� ����. I rt �� IFi i 1 1-tin-1 14... 0 pa I� ¢ 1 rI'I 1 i fit`_ 1 r 1. VIE `' f & ,�Ai� I I e xG t�r4 VI t ��r rq ��l1 sel¢ ,l'Ilit r L�,. t as l�1d��(� rlI I I ip 4 ''1tt'Iiiih . ta r t 1\ t I 1 (St t� \fi rr \"-.- �E�111 it 1� a 1.'19 bill . • 8-14 20500.OLOLOHO - 1vllrnans 036IA3N OdO ONL-iL/13040k - BBOtOL - „,t.m�.,,,W„-,«w.,w.inn..,. pit '�� E � x «,. . �N e� i- t .1 1 1111 <fl O) >ry z Y tio 5 3 N O H H tl O I tl 3 M tl 1;�, .e m S a O N• ct aeaae w • 0 v a 0 N ru ' E�Ip����..�l �.•ri1 l!S t ix 2 vg,„..1 1 2 cc �ry 9 0 q kt id�la q R tl/i! &5ti s'a dfFi4«�,'nt t ' C7 19ylary8ulwlnNllvuO � E 0 tZT s"l'n -! tax,[ I li 1 gg st ' / L' ,.F. M . p ,I/ 1r �Lvi �, it 1 A X-- {tip t �� �.,9 t '�k.� rif ° 19r1 II FA t4>n' ' �!�1.i ���``. }! � ft. `i -,.,'jam `/7 = �I J1 q Oq� t E K ceir4,1 J� F-- I(h a 8�11'y 11 1tj c at �, ¢a t;J '-.pi fk, F a ° tStl'°1��111��I �+�Upliil.t '!1 II 4Elyif I1 iy S r', 4 ia, 1t (j�'+. A .�1t1YN...a, a i��i�� z r g B pL' y PL{7�M$I�E 5 �'. —,. Inr ��� nb sb l��UR 3 trot"t Mr,i ¢ e- i2 "� g u Y aa d a QI.d,�4� 5 a 'sts4 '" i'St v" s "g @c It - ,-fit oI'., i ds +?�� a airi�,FCd Y 3 v 110 aIll P'>`ska 4:11;x r i3 'S pi, ,t ' ix..v a-,�_rc' I Z -, d a 3 z Z 5 F 5Vn2 'r _<__—_.. T 7kLSi'li,k,9 p i -N •f-r , > gas gi5zti az '0:1L c ?C-j1e w anHgna. nu �T: di 3 uta 5'zZ y2o P/4 t *OII_-, J c g liim mg nil a i E ,11 5..la k.t 1 . s•'a'''4 Edo dN2 _ l ,1 m 3 s� 1 1 • I B-15 ZOSOD-OIOZOtlO - 1V111%BOS 03SIA38 QUO 0NZ- 11/0040 - B•01,0Z you nr w.i.,,r mn-m w. ma.�m,'W+ i i, $3 ; '+1 < x I "t""" L11 5 ` <R2 0) >N ZOD r `/. ASS 33 14 0 11 N///tlVVV 7 1 tl�\3)'W^Jtl' . I'li o I .1 1 DF�m Ti- < <u V \O ✓.Y '1 '.; lir: 5 ! I6ii ¢>< k � dad 1 dm • f: 7 3 333 ddddd m w 0 1t ? I $ U N 011,41g1117ELL a cc W ,� 1 Ti'lME❑l_L CC �ft'r H © 1f t, ,tt1ru :1H1L Ili, I--- vIi I i `°�4 � IIL IL:I y J ..7.1. o:. PA.A' S ! ��{ Ply 1 ,IIf I I. L r yyB -L- . RK' 1 m v. ll, lfiryG5077 I I '�' tH Il�arl I�'8n" „.1._ I f+�T s...}.. }�i nP il �! 31` C c.9 ! A'SY t t ti i1 !1_`- �fFFk1�{LI 11/ sb �F ,v; s§n�_lel fB�OBr ■ A b d� "7 .11511,1 iY,r -0� .. I.. a p.`°'3 >'I 11 't 6 mi I . .. ICI «�n .1 t x Age I r -. .�e'.RVf ,intu � __• �H1' 1 nos,I..1 .g p � l1/ I1, I 1, ', i . ' I g I ff r/'i'Pieh r 4p I�I'`6,rlhlTt u i FFU BIM ,y 's �c d� r a� Fria J �t —11E-P1 14i'- I A , t — „.tsitz ■i r hT 4-c DI g 1 in 401 ,yt1wt ii;L ��I �'•': g pg f ! I I • 8.16 Z0900 OL0ZOb0 - 1V111N90S 03SIA311 O140 ONZ 11/90/10 - SLIOIOZ IW-Itr tau own.tn. ,oak .yr, •GI 6* i j i R I 6 rrvmno 1:i. !f� �S� z¢¢ WN Z N 53HOH NV 3111314V -. <°�I 1 f! tua SN f+a 1 _ Q er NIO�✓.4Ift, ii 3S IHSl! g,' i � 3aii ii JFj F Qom. 494�d m � / d w • 0 1II Z Q =as- m _ QZ H et I��r 6 2 11,iI ( n H0 ...._—, _ , ao dd 11F 4 ca 3 w. ®4 i � �i111 ngC s� lit t ,r,l '1 i� sus 1 t r- '� 11, (1 i G --I ( u FIT - gii ^ii ��1 ., o �� • �� •aml n r t� l 1 t Ig_ i # I / �l id: i P :( ' o g T IA ;/ is I z :CULL! It „lipid:r�' t 1 1 �P 1 /r: II DLL• o s '� ',j�f Al Q+dc d e ,\ i :iii ,r`r ;;Lt ! j siiii lti1 ��...,g 1 f 111 ` if/ tr ;; { iCLL'L SIP® g : �1 I / ° n 6 �. ing,n. 0p, Ileac;X11 ; i I ¶ IJ \�' 6, �qL. ,_, _tt Any I m „7 i r n, -1 , A Iii ::I Ji . I r1 r 1714{ 0,1 ,' 'a _ A 1\I \52TM1 ygM t r :% CC ,� ,t, II LI[r��- t l "t`a�L , l- ,x," , i 111169, a i, ��OA��A'w I�11aIBll�ltih iin 6 0 MI Ng III M) trim atr t 'Z I u x t� u,°', I in -11,afr=i,ti MI gas, #j I go-I 1 ._st ,.,la 11 .ft: 11 ti, 4 wain Illni j}1, lit,It, .::I SI �R1 a L r • B-17 ZOS00.010ZOU0 - 1V111W80S 03SIA3N Okla OK IL/90/LO - 911OLOZ ,a,nr xw..a,mu-ar um.int6"...ms'wn In: ;;,Ft,1 w YL.W'r.Y.W.'A 65 -1 I G N 1J = o� •13 iii 000 CO / W. zF • O �0S3WOH �N/VV�OF �li y3WV .w 5:;' s,, 1 i� ] tU' in, 400. }} ¢ N ✓� ltd lib dae m 1 d w I • / n :-4-...--..! 'xis _.''r s "1..-? vF i.,:- t.tuf 4 ,yy.:Apa 3i's 1, 'I3i A Jr' sk;6 �n 1 P� 1 , T,, S4 rj<*.. 81 it i &* fie raj� �r.�4 x p 20y a 1 I k ellui *I t l ����OR P ��� t� I Ali r,„ ,P� g'ntlt l ' ' is I :ti, K aYN ells, t � x '28-" + 1' �1�, 1 11nil,4 rt. F� � am h1 11n111l �� a`,/� 111 I ! 11 I III� ;i■ Y3,5tvtim L ,f la v f y i t ,' III p�0lln11E, ® 1 m *• "" f` XFM r ,y.nspt yv a 1, pt, ■A �p� 0 _ `� G6t g 3 r y n' w t �.-s ij I e B a r '—9Y ft F it n g a e ;U \�t. r-4 (wi r t ' F r ¢" uu +1" "q �` ', ®�7u1. idy �a ^fl P'„EA.,•. :.- '2.'171474� - o-". ie �yex�l@ a :i' 1L�•. m°711'11`1,11.3ri.J.j Sir ei�1 I 4� lig ,A. . �� .tA rr14 !# $a8r 9 i 1h J a� r- Peg te—e-6 r , r. c V a, y ,-� pg R �i 'a' fr rl '`. �� # 7" eBucatl iiil , s6:d 8�� �Q of 3�'g°s� I / I cr r 9 } F r t 0 1p G"` K� a , >b°=g 1> "+. / r ;Jet: 'y p 1 F� �R 6T oL13 .i ---, , ' cm,-I.{ qY*3. .. is=8Ygo •q13 k / atl I-I1� +3 rs°s: 1 eN11141j�ah 18_ 1.s.,,.:1 S 4 rl ogry5g.y:"Kd ,y�r'e^ l� �77� x drP ,, mil fl11011 4 r ig'�II V 1I r<gag"`ig°` 'y u- L 6 r ,�� e g € v@ 0.* aep 1•',41..„/„.S• ,, '/n ,t ilr..i g l t' e paArtn`,r- - Ak4:: ri , .ors,, IRig i A 1 I h I' 1S 6 N g a 14,; ,.y /k. ' Eery J p�1., S5uyBl gl�l ?AM ,4, r 1 1 " 's„ t 7.ti\ rlr(\\ •�$�^' '(' !1 1 '��',i tkc..,r,r j.1149Ire 1 a t Ir 3 �,E;Pa ti �k21L 4fP,“ I. t. a1 ry C. c tlnF @p •r- o V gg .d r - `, a U" 1r k ;gEPfM. t tbt \ V IR Int 1 ' r s nt W e• x+. da'_gr.s els i rrx,y I r , • �, farre,��if a - �gya ��p pp pt ;� 1, • . 'si ` ri ms_ nc sW°c3 �8 �� °u irkl ¢I r ,m+i' IIut , e w ? ¢, ..IA- 'F"'a' tt▪ o.frit.�nq-. Ir"P IIfA1`g. tt ti d,: a c"1 '11 i lei��� Fw7rJ 1. u°1 , IVy jytwtp3{� yQ,I ia� 1 1 b 3 * 1 I _ e ,. Pile 1�1 , r fi. i t � 1 • '�r+l>e m°E .,3 g , P8m 1. a m A€ D "zr r �Y 4 .. •4 I u s V P. _ °, F p ,;-=',1 1 air 19b:rwarla .-_r•°e c,ul � zs =� �w8 �e' ' a `1.V0. • r5 a"7 l']'1,11:16''' s M1 4e1 :Pn'1i'a0{i4, a of h ^59 y„ ,a; Dirk I V �.. I-, of R: F- 3 Y `L, g i y R /i4 +n 'S air ' a I +` n Ac,ct 1 I, wF3^ 13g 3 u'} Qnd.;1"P9a1Ij 1 1'R ,rx3� y v � y in �� w5F3 i;as3b L c 141.0.41./‘Z '`. .I 1 4 V. � ,u.,q4 ,19 `.x'.1'4,' of °q 7,1 2,i,� I�i° >m94 t aW.�g ��ay�yeY � � �� qg°�;�r .1 r�� �,��'�t1s.'( P„y /Irti0 t .- ,..,y.�((r.l 4 u"'Ca 6i8=-2 e4°" �L t 1II � IM 1� 4,1 /'{cl1 1 it'- ttala;,-.. _, piiir.' 1,c _.off t, i ___ ,�s .{,� I it'-:, �' i n Al D n-n z s g 3t-Ajif�ILL,//741# dam.+ -�II r 4. r rtr,4,.a 1?' ,- C.`r v?d' ¢ J g94 s'$ 11:A ,v S 1 -j .w "st y;;5' `} v t s� y i E Y.IxgR A, 3 1 111\ \ , itI:9 v 4ri., °',e�1 shy'`"*' IV,`„ ,, -sew- . .�f \ . > !s s{I P1 F, e ,.+ 4 r r'y1 ,pp I�LJT.JL�J�I,i In La ,k..'» " ^ 1 a I t 14;4. h g i V. ri ,t 1 �0g8 �w + t lV c s.i i gE FILM I cn6tta �� , . .� g g y� i6�eJInw drowld / p1 1L'ia9 � y sr,,g£ y3 "" 67,4A I P w01 j: R '8718" i 1� 11'�1141i V, 3 I 35 gH ita I0y,B, �, q 6,lmletgr , II r € , +1ized,Firt/. 13.1 r Iy11 2 F1 ;$ °ad60;0',41 I!l.l s 1', (� I "�fll�61 Q 7 hug !• I " L�yolp',q�„. ,�{1 ;di , 'Ag7 s x • go Lns IL ••• r y l WW1.�I r fl i).. �1 g g Vi' r ,ll4'1 Y,A O C /.y ' B-18 70900"0lDZ0U0 - 1V111W00s 03SIAEU 0UO ONZ- U/90/ID - 9LIOI07 wv-nr uru..e,ma-m wa ma.�wn'.w six v," - �y m -_ tt 1i I i 6m a Zm 20,t, T 53NOH NV � Itl3NV in-ii- ��rI ��' 7 �r N 000 a � m 2 V VOY —IDIN 1, j:� Idie e�� m�< ! d �6 w LL� a •II t • aeaaa pptyllJuming Fan CC LI Q p µ� .9',BZ Z b CC B I 1, 1�BS�A ) b lip a ' t , � a I��dlgl LL a If -te �D§ I FI f A _/ �I 1� gib 'y't'1�h§`�' `41,a,7"T1„% c'''d�} ^��'{� ;'' i�'i ,I�y 999 01. 1 rr.' 3.r3; 1°44 r 9� sW` d l' : 711 li wyi f� iY tTAq ..1.,�� P IV ¢ II alit.IC v fling ac�,, i o r G n4 Si 2+04.7\1 D � 9 ti y�!� L �I cc +tgCYptaal. *• wt._s u`'sc � O 6 S' cote. a nc><� c.. >�r 'I� '� E j a 9 '�A F.3k' . » 'r" E`,Y'.fRi v $ 1r !•`BI`s !- g 7+' g @ f*�r�r �Y a13" 'k , •� e z„ a?"ADC a 1112:' `filly dBOlI d3A1:� s �FnDC'itsr�.R. ..ZTi1 +i 2L I NI',Ii q °! I "qe$ :a rBl�^ "� t L7 I U ��lu &�f'S'I a> may; n �B 1 16�u h� o e �s i "s� ' a a nny F'hi td�, 17 q.,± 't i z a !v, 9=8 .41,-E,-..D .'^n Faiz' v /BI 5� o a N 5i" Lg n:53a r o e €o yWO y ry � �g' I�� � -5,� -_ a 3 ��a ��9 � I�'u- �c qi e,°I91°{!� �'Jl,�li! i i nom i;:402..-It,s u gr ;3x, h' Jd 3s i yJ .c� I/ I!Y 4r 2 it ay�� a ' 1 1nr.....214_. t 8 :: H '11a a x7a s45g D I t Io n -�' � �LreL'. x° o e°a>£z$ oys iri , /h BkiaLl hN I s^ r U ra '(I �� ��AV.g1 Its?. grr c VI1.3d"�N�'i�lq:I '- s� sryr dpi 7 sE n • n!. E w s .: 1 'I ® sS BDtl Y �k,v � `.-F -� 7� ., � 1'"n;`IDIr��rI�EL R11. 1 o i • B-19 630500!-01030tl0 - 1V1111e006 03SIA3t1 Otl0 0Nd- N/60//0 - 9110103 nu.ro ono air aa.wi 0-,wo"•MJ la3 Y:1i Eiji °t G u' .Q Ul e 1 < Q 'L rn 0 S,.? e- � .w le 0 1. t 63NmH Ntl ] Itl 3 N tl ��� �3"I jigs Ooo I 1 go . F N �O � ' ' of 1 jigs S5 �rm N Qa <wti i CC • I:i. d } 44444 - m A A d W F F- o LL I W ' tri 01°t' ,MII1l:I ¢ 11,841. 1 th ij v 1 � i � "Mill 1 -t. 1 ii8_asp a 1t IC�.'�!F u`t1 .°`' --, „ C i a M _.,,,---•_, y " sal .y rlil ■ � - y L I1+'f'r r1� ;'a- � M1w1pp '+r41n . 'f' !r`-,�1 I �EI©g�_q.1�E. II gL'llltl -�l� Y'! ��bey grni g- ���C11Y�J 0 ,'„ ,il I "' .nut ' ' GaIro11rr m 9 Q,� . ,, ft a1 a6lo r ailt4 pE , '' Qt1 4 ttll ital y n '141.dE u 1f„ l 11lG , 6tl A�111Gy((I F 1 $ 1 f°.�`ye r ..i , i aPgylliK el„x 1P, 1 ' in, I ayllilldi�l"�uJf�mi „an , d4N'„i ■l c"ewl; h I F(ty��. �^ / �mhs t 0l , , 4,Fi�t"`4Nort. d.' dJ d�Bill -. 3tat�yYt I i�• 'f b?rS 1 . 1 1 I ftit,siyilly �yl hi uY ltl 7 1: s R 1 p I i�y na I of ure 1l rd "I° 'I ... , 1 Y'1f1 I uU--mum i" 9 " 1 3*. I��of r i 00 I '6r L " 1 �' i fi' 4 PLa. / 1V. O� � ItO�'101IIIt;�i9,�i[ py,�, !° eA f � a " Yr 1 H l Erg rs" frs11 i'lr l' a " 0°I II:ai °ratio r lei m-' Iti{3�guhi e� }'..''le'.7h.1+ a�11. a 4 f a ,9_utlrti�ur1 Om �f .I, q A h t Cel t ° i ;e t6F�ns 1 tf 4t 1 I Alt w 'c.'A0,v ,.„, 4 a s 11„P., 11 IS terr,r iti 3:Rita, y. fe`:YY.'111y*LY_ l�x6ap Uy�`i�st3 �.�6 II tiicI flc 9" "'t ' � ,�` lb, J ta°y� 18 S s r, plFn Ip.SK?gr ie 1 i ° ! t' fEl[1'Y ill Il IY s s IIIq 1En nv 0121.1 Lay o #tz�Jtw^.av ill 1p .11 Aga- 0 B-20 ZO500-OIOZOtlO - IVllIYl3O6 C3SIA3N oua ONZ- II/80!10 - BLIOIOZ ®.n' n.,oalt 1.1' 1 +i j •t -<„, ¢ w. a W. c.,! -mi S3NON �NpY�DI�^V�a^HY' i:sii � 6 '1 !Iii - 25m k w< eim N �OIA11✓E I `�YF , 16 ' 11 C 1i N od >¢LL [ a t.r7dl aeaaa - m ! ! 1 m tgIPN flLLIPlhfl Ilma'+0 - Q CC „h6Z Z b W O Cr r ry u 9 7 ,r • iryh E'r 3r u¢c �IHF�9 �" s r ;,1 PI;TINS/ I I 11 r" f a� "1i ''H rI' V +0}10(�Oxri piigN -- f/ ,I, 6!/511 I'f 1�,'�i m Vapy.„ = �I t1��I !tu'ti�,Nl�l/1I eln �// �I no �pY 115Ue. �1 iM_ :'i 4hl°II it `0\ F \ Em 1 'rti CIO/ i 7IlI _ �� I'��' 14'La 1A9 ,�1 1' Ih.11 11 jIYL ° : iu-C �-- t 1 m..t.i.kth t,,..1• nb 1 isms t,I ri``IIM - e 2 6Uu 1 'Ir i 1 b n E ,,,� + c c p�NN& C y . e II 'T o - Sg +a vn� bn t� ' �F 7 8 - a8 pl�Llaara Firm Y a Ip[tpli/ ry1 >< 3 1 r7 e $ '8 rCN pn4,4���� i ?a Iladtt� i. 4 7° $ 4 90 N r'll-Y: •rd d dur s, [t� J '� a 1E�m I 1 '.1:1 1 F'1 ,s 0 sa B ,� 'Ora ,I I� w I/ g 3 ��;Brpl ni0 y1t" is"z t 0,0.11:, a a 1B B",:,r ° 1 I 3°(lf r ;� z a so nl/�filll s' • -' Id 8 ,RLIP1 ' Ix(1- a L o Fl s g!? °3 1W�,016nC1tfjfl�i �In, sE ti n i "F Ii ) Y II y tli t 1 V .N tt a s� ea: >; gg iDj �i!JI' *F!x z .. I 9 i w AtfLifiiia•FL:r?•I 41 • • • • • B-21 I ZOSOO-etOZOeO - iviiIWens 03s1A3e DUO AO - ellOLOL ww-nr wu..i i ma-®rs°..°1,.�r�...""r.v 41: $ : :' t- -. a sw.".".3 nu I".1. i 1 I z a a Q i m p a CV 5/5 33 14 O N �N////tl���\r3 1 t1 33)'14 V �'{I i{S ,I .P-t-,002,, } e § ><2...= t N �OY l✓t Y off. d.iii I]I ¢�a i Cn 1gain a i Q f:1, 3 1f5II m f ww • dddd4 w F- I- b 0 W , CC cc r I 4i 11 t.1',;:. —I a a [s,ic iI.AC, '-7I 1 IKI. "Iiiri I r1 -c-ii: IAnwu I ;{I II I Finibaui{Iu'sl.) rill(r I-ilG# 1 II' in rMcac.r� t7f4i.43_t° ""^'m1gotla vAm 1 ' �t -n -0 e u/ Ip"Pw ri�E"V III �i.u� '"� Fie ■GAG C�� �i ,If 1� 1 nE§' p tI�I ido % Q , I.i I 'I!• GGG . -J`FII 11B 11-i• rit YnC434` . _ 11 '-5' T 4 Wtl 'I c 11.0 tp rtJ ' 4•tii I ' r.t ''i',t1 {�` �„rt./g k g i j 2 gkl ii jt\ I. �. )i) O = i 1074,E ii. a ; u'g y xl,, 414 e'3'n 1`. I G w f'I r W :% 'l 1' 2:�'*; '� 1t °.`w .U.L SS • Hai\ G �F II ::: NIli d5 1 1 •Ay ,,,ad ` pI' ' iii o '_�' ` f{'�” t''1'a.stun, i] I% 4 'id s UJI l \ 4 r n,11 pil'II u�°�5 a ��� , .u. } r"p+ ,'ilgl;{ Ixuge„\ ' $ GCGGI �6 u x Y 12411:11P; �' I I°�°1 4 Imo' � q/7� ®l Ix--� GGG �. 5Si33'N �1"I8} GI/i :- ifnaii '4 I ' .,. 2 �� T Pdiy r..-_- °E"N'eI J,i., `.- E l\ QI E�L• - � Bs�F�3� , I`N't 14 9rego� E . ,p:, g �yld�1elrl ❑� �D. x9 IUt, M G."dl 1�y,,'r1if.,dlie KuItRI 19°m 1'4 3 I_.J a" IIo�I�n 3 S 1 - mg:li x l 24• 1 T 2 • • B-22 20900.0102000 • IVLLIWOfS 03SIA314 01:10 ON 14/00 40 - 9110102 wiwonwo ..i.03WOH NY3Itl3Htl -- �l'•I ,' � fl OOO 62 ra¢ 1 N CC 'ic�/N/ 1-��t •h. ...�"l i !!1111 E S i N N(9 Y \['1✓1 CI A', h A I aaa m>911 I/ ! i' W g LL J a • o —L___,_ e 7y I ( yEyry W IJ N a $¢' d H / CI 0< . ,..,a :‘ 1s1 0 LIJ J ett � i c 101arl thlIPIIAA lle l0 g _•• ! LZ ibIPd ynpl ∎I M:. 1 Eiiii Qlli J ,c pplltr�V%eir .KL `dj �7 ��OY; lvtiM Zrc+1u YA @ ha Z g! O R,:I , l )'io p0 P II I I I S � t1 s 7 ni PI iii:...4,, 1 iV• !' � � tL k Sit;i u m 6�I1'' .. . , °10 q 1 �I 1 iap 0� ., fi' qy�I L i �II 11 E 5-I II— �d' / l—� i II N bu .' k erJ nr@ g O g, r4, / ,n 1 , 1 /1 - 1 ^ 1 I li IM ��55 Qa3!! k -wq nfil 1.4_ i,„ I�F1fi d'i'8tri n ri / rl 1„1.,. a9y h \t 7s1 • '�.a 1 � IHaUi rp.1` / gy „ Rn`r:S 'BI%¢”/1['4∎ 10- -IA,-''''''/ LI fit, s. lie: iS Fl P rr c E1 CI li + t�,IU411 I4 ' ° It � f II t pill"1 fr E h---=`m....1441: s IIHW CAI.i 0 tI A�alto i n■■ \ �" a0f�tijf A1 1.,Pga ,I:Cu� lt-1 ;�L�Iif„; E viii ,1 a'."-j n' 2' 'ia�..! Il s nni 1 .4 1 �i Li i ?id St, ,'"- q 1 11 ii''n°�pnp0r\� Line ILPi ',r,7 L!((�''.�C��itia 1 jg / / l 2 L T � x911411-- P5'.11 r' OF @If P� ri t.m4 r,d'1p ■■ ' ,41 111111111/ Vi i 1 • Al u s r HAIntl NF.•'$ii'Iti ! r a 11 k ■mr)li; ! , d ' . ` p 1.! ' 14 CI - tis ' 4 /t f CIII ' ' 4 Bill E _ o gg ney{ i� l 1 'p i'' • 1,141 AM* A 9 Ild- � �f links s C■■ ; -!� 5 t''S • B.23 ZOS00-010ZO1:10 - ltl1LW606 0361A3tl OU0 ONE- 1.1/90/t0 - 9110tOZ tow-ew duo al,ow-,w*to aue..om0'... 4111 3? ° '! lY ' M w{'^ v ryom], i < won,* 3-i' d.� o Q Q i n o o C) 6 3 M 0 N N V O l tl 3 N tl I f 6 s 0 o 0 CO w a r a N '/V' 1 ^i ill :, ` 111 ,1 I CN i >; I Q • �OY ��I CI fa, a ! tea m 1 S a m d aaaa® IropH viimunk Pam cc Q .tl,SZ -Z b W 0 • cc v't F tP a r n LL e `•n;1 , 1 AMU 411°tly`f11 fi7g�i� i �n is It1�! x !u r e/ 0_P� I IL! s 1gs 15lr c a 1111 r Q G u ...4.v.7.0 r ' 1 • trv5la �i u �// py� 'fn ' k iQ�r Nt4�rt: i flit It I loili �: If6 r �' /�� �� 1r6' I „ •i B {( �� , as • / :M, �r�1 g aka4� ,,,, -� �I�„ 1 hg"! a� q cv f:' aF q yI 4 a P r— �, �} 'T"' % i9FSg Q v�• I 1 �r a ,sty 1 in On " g gib ,,t,/it ,- r, ° NJ1 1Iiii;i• eQ�Qry . i 1 } 't Ilia'?" pgII ] Cali■�gZEzi 1j 13;.! 1 'i:�;. w } Suf ;t 1� 11�tl Q ', �".� I� y a 10 nGU� 1.111 yyr I ,or x _ c kQ j5',t ( i Rill- e WH7kh.-.\. jl�! ;id it f,++l I o ,-e, s .1 � Ra! ur�411;.,..-� A r i+ t�s SI'i iltJ 4( e 41151141.1 i7/1 tbn rF. .� asll(@1 III o E� a � �� 1`ol ll 't�F- iIf i na 6a r� dta� /- U v 9s ,' I1°ilan '.5; --l 1 . ii Ili to Sys v.a a' uQt 4 k 6x1 1,1",;..1111 np , IT3:IQe , 11 ', 8e ;aLW 6s li -r- Q1 cJ .:1 - ss.air ft Fji^'^i 1 ' *g"s3 *age gilie n531I ; s °t/ �I1 HF1,J17i��f j IsQr, , ' y o- nee ae k 6 h z u ( Jrn I,r�l de�ea a 9101-+°3,}rL� k':�i 11 11 -c f !, I z a cs!.-.` nQC1 ' ' 1✓� 8 �Iv v:!thi s it,iI' a �G..,sg- .R �I�qU �Gt �i 7`rsi� V.:7.-21�Ic & r•sri.n., t1- 1 rjm,: • > ,naslgs.� �x1 511 `' ■ t 11,1$ i t11 F r: IonH ' . ■ v4^'' .•! $"eke = i Q� uara 1 �egti1 ° '' :..',111 Ise I t A ■■ 51[ ( 'Ai." s NY6.W . ,0 / 1 =• Q E, 1�4q �F� 3 a'k e� I a, � 171 ; gs 6"9ers < g-`HOM1"� ', .I W'[L761:M o E ounn@ ^$ r '� mE Eaua t t, hj �i, u q 8 y4,,...y ill / a°s • !n5,4F J" -rlVaikai,._ ce'�:t1 m 8y.3 pi . « ��Bi1'.1- Ih�C'+�� � $8 t: • • B-24 f�ZOS00-OtOZOSO �Y111Wa(18 03SIA3tl DUO ONZ- U/BO/40 - BL10102 V4-mMY..rrmw-®:wove�D�.. ill j tl F y �� s5'�+ rn ut S,- < Ili• mroleo IN I 1 E z a¢ Q tO O (h (. 3NOH N//V31 �tl\3141/ i71 4 ;- , .. =Um co w; a§ N I \O ✓ti f. rte•[ i ! _ N a aeaaa I m • F-, f— b I 0_ J . • a ljr11i�!1 u� I�re,Az itt'YIl w �_ r rl�'r s, i.-./.� t+jj{'lp!Itld1 ii:t l , si N I' I 'ft A �1� N ig t , «a �41VIM � Fi ry 4 iil L+I I AEI c, .}�t :} le :177.1N n I +�� j r4 I 1I 1I „� .t t Na 9 'Sy* r _ r r •.Iy �In Sn1 I, a/4� 7. ii I,, r ( i ix Vim; f � l m� z � prr 1 -1 1. t r y �f '''' ' r — -- I •1' 1 ':,..-1:•-. • 1 'I'A! ,',I."iiiti, ,, , 1 1 . . . . k t, I) {1 '1 -____Hi 4, ir1:31.1 ..r/ , ',?'-i.,0' ' 1-1 . 111',1`,;•'''' I NJr F I r A9�W r7� 1 v , No- I I ,H� ,. i + #f r tt ? y , ,�ntl ti a : � 'fr 11 YY ,J @�J� r*,,�. : I1 lit n it , r•1414-•3 (y yg'} r 1It�M�13 '�I �'� R n0. iL y° k/ -^,�f '° +ga ��1� � I+ E8 ICI -1+ ,111 7 $fvf� 'e I I.:,11/M 11�{ g s ` �tS'' L am`' � i � `vW Pc r 11 ,„3i.4 Fn �R 1 r'�}.fFi-PV�y`3aeb �J rt'• A, t.'', $ of I * !S "t� �l..r= ��' kfihGBrHC r y�: inE r —"' .Ss z. ° e ;1 J 'l 4y5y +-.k 2+ a 1 .r—:'-4 r c„ IPA IN dtdalr555E555 CHR-a R it 5 f E as hll1l IN T I. ME.: 1[...ill'1 • '+ I ° IdF so . Ful(1.v • • • B-25 • 2390a-mum:la - "Latvians 03SIA3t1 0110 aNz- LI/90/1.0 - 011OtOZ • wsc-nt caw"I/001Z-at%HI ZISZ6 ila,IPJ 1•••• §111, 1■- <<0 I-ZU) 0a on wave ereeL01.3 MS g-,z 00 1103011.0 5.•i• C\I S 3 140H NV3111311V7 ..\ ri., 1 ._il 0 0 0 < 1 .. .4- CNOIA1-1D1111% }:1; 1 i .' =- °5< 2 03 2 i 1 2 m a < <- 0 1 I 3 ki. • # • . --z-_.4a,..,1--- ;j::: 1; ,•• :•-• • : ' *D; J•Z :z, ' 1 l . . ,Tel OW le .' r'''•••••j e ,11'f.;l - :1 Z f! _IMO zzi 3- !II •'; 111; 1177°1' • ' :f -T :•, Z ; ; ." LI.2.-.1.2"- i : I 3"; '.•-• :4 ''.:C mo ■■ r i :I'' ;", ; := k ir ; 1 i 1 ,.. z :1„ ■ . ,.-.: / CO 6 f21•:,;•:_f 1., le,1 ,ad4cfth•pluizzzill.; ::: ,cr' -; i-''r•' ! ' tirtt=-Iii 11"-; ! - r: :: ii i 0 . ■."A A. . .. I IL'its--tsr--'' .;.;;. ijii.; H : II c--- I ' I :i i s:i'3; ki: :ic•it ! o (..) li:1: ;•.Y.3. i:;3•!!1: 0 1 I. .i,•.' - - ■PL:::-,.‘ ' .. . . ,.. Mo ' i 7 tr.%) e. -.,,,, ; : •,. a w a i:'1 7,:- .7'.7. •• 'I' ' • <E 11: , : '4•4.0..T, 7 : .7•••',..1. ■• e az AI H e.Z•el;aZze••;z:zzi•Zee ;t• " I •;Z 1"•••••;'• .: 1 '• Zj CC° I I .3ti333; z1....'r- 0 u I ;. I 0 .• . < 1 0 0 - ! , . . •• - • 3,. . ,..33-.,..4„,:dt.:ac.iii r,p ■ L..:::•: ,' .1 •-• • - 3 m i s:: :!:t.f': I ._ 04 .- fro. T .4C----r- • i 1 I 1; ;: ;Z ;' '•" 0= If - : IF= 1 ; i ‘;i• it•-Z;.; i?..1 0 g J .. I h-. ::: ,; ?;.-“ ..3,-. w 8 _ — , t,,, u..c i Y.7 ' Lt!- ■ i; , e B.26 0 • c+. r^ en c... C.•.. Li. •/1 v, Co, n c C/) m m = c o C.) n v CO rn r mi O F N N co L. CM: �Gy CO i _ 0 .v TN T = N e u O F" w 1_ Q* 4 n°° , c Cs'GO• V GN R ` ~W N i N O m_ a Q y o 4 G J &YY eta •Imo) O U C c'�.. c C Q d a'c ° CO = G P Q v y e 3Q As e m Cy ed m r m [CJ r`O. vNi cNi� cNi� v' o°'o - 0 n m m ;_ d G. O. 4 C c+. • • • • • EXHIBIT - D B-27 7nG10-OIOZ380 - 1V111N9fS 03SIA3H O80 01.2- LL!90 •0 - 9110102 °rvmu°- z 91 0 w .. L_ ^5533�'WOH N///VVV 1OI�N 3'WW V11 / 7qr - � 00 "� yz ' �J t/ , j1a lC a� i (n oa o ..: a d d d m 2 A ; • u t t c rlr nn n S U = a 1 104, I r= @ s w �a J - 3.` I . 5 0 o42i °'t .EI. ' 0 5S :J I �'Y c W CC i ^V t • e =mom N Ge --I I � gym° E- 1 0 s 1 J Ilif q5 ti 1- ��' � m°• ma I u°E F,o 4 — .0.9 .V.0L ..0-3L • B-28 • z0SOO-OI(:'Jdn - maiming 0361A33 383 ON? 2/90/L0 - 9 nnlog I o t a 314011 NVOI U E HHY / \\ ri 1i '6:22 �. r.7 Q t / NA / p • a d d ' o e c e c c , t C c c c » says DDS ASS• n s 3 8 - .. L' E2 -P A g ' a.•4. N $ $ s r -,,, d. .- iyg��,l J 0 cob. 5 . E.I x Lu H m• y w a Y Pi-ry . a - D n � _ w �_ z = _ o Ec g ac e I a Na- q J I ooh !col a Ems' V _ w cc J i 'O' LI1 J L L It_ U alic r J i cc. a a • . B-29 mrno-mozoda - Iviiivi:sw 03SIA38 OHO OW- LL190ELO - 910L0 • . ' II 1 1 .7 ..t -I 0 , 531,40H NV31113WV " tt- i. 1 :5_ 'I;a) :.‘• E, Z < 43 A 2 ..! , • < 03 .... • pl '-' Mal 2 1 • '\°I . II _ • _ 1" . . Mill to il: cz [ fr: ;•-• =7.7 Oeide MO co a m 0 0 , 111111 II. to' co 7' ___ a 0 II .. J .cr . in • r-, ci F- 11.1 LI 2 I 0 0 H,'1 g_go. 021___111 1-- _ z _ Is _c C- r Ali W _.1 EL 1111` .. • >c: . c_, . 0 —1 CC I I 11 _ _1 w 0 0 0 Er, DS CL 0 -1.0 c,m in LI(.0i T a) 7 'L LL, . u --I CL • LU S I-• 0_ 0 • 0 8-30 7.rISSO-CS:ZCUll - Iv].IIVIIIIIS UltilAiti ;MCI OW,- lli90/10 - 9140LOZ ... r I .c .., <0 3,I ,Osic30 40471ML-Ljzs. ! 3 Pod -. cc zeit/ a :.-- Fc_,,Z :...!.-•! u.,o.0 t S3140H NVD111314VN m2144- : - L . . - -'0 a, kk t tl t , = o r.. 5.• 7 Z!. ;j 1 . • id ...■ fft U ci W a 5 D t A A A A A- .219 , 7 . p ) 1±1 __ .....--,_....— C--7,-1.74. Cr - Ilpt.Ext 11 ---2)5.ag"-- g ,,,, . -! 0 r° F cor. ,,.:. E...= ——9 0 7 = , i :— i '=' c-c -= -- .-- ogo 41. t-c, a iS . . . . , . ci = .... ._._._;---1r---'.....1„. ,,,...__ . rs;-, 1 — --— —. i i ..rw" ___Fit\ ‘ . s. .—E • '''? --; ii 2 —..,=-,-.L ' s • .. . iD 11--f7 . , ' °P I cO=4 t5= =L- . 0 = =.1 0 l-12 —I 0 A ,. „ -A [ ,= _, !:1A-.-.. LI_ P-4-- 4 :: A I g- ::w--.4 • al . ....„-. . ..--.. / ,. .._. ," .1- _J „0-.01 „11-,11I .S-.SI Al' ..P.S1 sif i 21/, 14 1 l.) M 05 , . J ) i ,- co L_ f L.LJ 11 • Ih--- LT_ '0 2 i - r ili rr co 0 __.,.. . • I ._. I ITT FT 11TI . B-31 7ncno-otz'sndu . 'VI.1 ivniffi■ U3SIAJEI 'JFICI Ovie- b/9040 - MI 13tifl it Z 121 CS3WOONNID— DA31WV . .% 6 6 _a re c, 3' 1c..■ I ° I ;„ ID ,1 v •.,, v, ..., ,..., -, Ng cv __■—__ 75-3! I Y a z a 0-) §it MA 1 .... , -_ZZi:::::::120:: 2_2 ;-. rt gl ■ / 1 1 c--a lizil Z , - ',7. CC'. , CIC X if. J MI + ... E. , u_ z < it 1.,J LB , “a i .7.-4: 0 , L r_ 1 a,..= .. az ,. ., E 0 0:. -J D -J W ._. CC ot O. ID C , LLL0C E5 1 ----- - . --- 1 \ §■ .-.----.- — b o o ;Z./1,n \ ‘.--1 T–It7g- v...„4. — , Qv 114=• I_ I iff.. I I'-' .•...:,::::,,,,.... , : 7 ...i .--.r..\ Lic.) • . .. G. It iiiiiii• rIalar:17nrra 7f trat"=-'.2g= 0 > I 10241 ---1 t. _ = .4 cc 0 al z r..0 3: = -J •- - o A czo" .11 T-E-1 r ipl cc IIII R. B-32 1 zneno-oLozutiu - iv]I IVNWIS (Eit-;1Ai1t1 :JERI (11,16- LL19040 - 91.1.01.0Z TX.0 at z tt a' ".i" .e.6 CN.I 1/2n' S3WOH NV31113W Vow\ ."- H 92 .4 , q!ic u Li„.frc_ i .40 CNIOIAHD111 /1; ;:::,, 3 ; .peli fc2,`;'`. co i '. '.-3 .°. i < 7 1 U. c. I cc?' ij 5 I 2 5! 1 r ———I=M1.1IC 1I1M111.,Ea t 1.O a=E 1 -et=tI I 111 1 —1 — w 0 1 rUr_ all ._ ... rani ,. al !I Ili - i Ll ct 1 cr _.I .._ i J -,E E r-- 0 —I LJ- , F ..--I Ii• L .. J ta: w cli a. r,-- . -7— SIMME Milinien .. \ <al 0:1 -PDC-i c ?.---.:c"n R• .. 11 ,__. u_ . . cp 7 ec4 I WO X a ,• co _I DI) =,:a =IL all (3 .= I-: . _1 Lii al EL r- . a,--- II > 0... 4. B-33 nicno-oLozoati iv I 119411119 LI ithn RI 11111 (1,44 t1.1111/1.0 - 911010e r.,IN9.0 , I 'r CD /-m 0 Es" ko cz z _J et LC—I i It‘i IL'D ' \ I' ' 53140H NV3111314V44\ r..: Q I. , s i 1—R 4 CN / -, -‘ CNOMDRI Y‘, 1;i: A 1 11. 5! .1"1 0 2 rt 2 0 i <. E - . 4 4 m u. 6 CC NiRt - ' • `LI Z a il to --c”w it: ,5,'; : a--,c ,i j.., i .3 !.7.. 11 ! = lk'9i. ib co 2 D igi Igli (3 Ht PgE 64 i .7 :A 31 1 Z Illl c.„. / i 0 0 . _I Li. K II 11.1 c 0- —/ < . l= CC < 0_ Ill ,_ 11.11 < I! t Y o -er Z e.." 4----= !...-: co 2=2,i - (0 — . _ D_ cc or II II , il--------- —1 U- .g •= ; Hag Lt _ .... ill 0- g ._. n. g D ,P0i 101 < Ht ! lb a. 0 B-34 A 414°0-0193;)L10 - 141.13113113 UJSIAJ4 • UU UNC a/40t'J - 941.4O3 , • I H Q W mania Ei _Om 2 M y.Z w- 53WOH Ntl DIN3Ntl • v 1 ii� m � }: � d a d E m 5• t c r c c 7.353 .5 ,5gY. g f o g a `s 22 ` ._.AIL 0 is -O'er v 3 3 F o e o a c h L� !- t c`a c —_ tea, _ .� _0 o z ,mss ,__; Po: .) v i g'L. _ �. Z u LL � �o • I o E E.' 1 0 �o = Vie$ a. rr xi 1 H s--4.. 0 ° J c.4 LL fi 7t= CT Cr s J W Y ,Al-,AI / /- I .o-sL / • • • B-35 e,11-,10 01W:id...I - 'IV11IVILIIIS IOSIAJ JU0 OW- II 90'10 - 9110104 irtn-_o....,... .: ,�..,.�� �,,. rim _ 555 33 WW O H 'N////VV\xrD�II 3,H Y •' It _-,! I, Ij _F 0 W w a ±– " t� _ tux 4�4 4^ - m f A ) • __ ,51 51g g d jC 4 T. " .- a d pU_ O y J ev 4 1 9 V _pw --- � _ 1001 roj - lob- -- a o LI J 5 N 0 0 Ink-s E j • , g J ao ti __`_ i w _ 0 � O 91 1 Molt_.= .: I na -- Intl Y 01-,NI 1.1.01 ' „ ..o-.EL ' • c c e c c c It, /s m.-.-- - _ gy m :: �'°m d c. 11 Li. O t C it w c P'. I 2 R ! o 1 -Ft) liJ j.--r inrj 1, . ...... z., J • —1 1 c d 'Q a.t=:Br. u tC.)3 3_ V y J ao N C LL J Cep __ H UJ 0,S J 1 xr.xi -01 ;.o-.1 • .o-st - B36 AnCnly01o23UU -IV111WF1118 U911A]d :)do UNd LL/bdM1rl - MUM/. ten, < Q C, N W m ¢ z 5 3 H O H N tl J I N 3 W tl i OO . w O Q/�0t A >1 � A � - , S �� Q CO( oa o i 3 ; LL�:, ev w __ co 80 0 q s a Q co IS OLD I a `° I v a- o � LL C Q f to o c F7 d7 r a_ k. = - W U O . F I- Y a o • o i e2 W Z z It A LC K ',;- I. O O O CL J U. 0 W O J • • B37 ,.l r"II)-olUeitlO - IVilIViill (JSIAJd Dtlo (III<• U"10811. - 9LI woe : ,,, .. a L �¢¢ g ^�u N 53NOH NVO1tl3Htl •\ k 1: m t0. wa ::. F. d d d= x 3 ' • G E E C C C e S9M0S • c .' x $ a � e 9 0 L. 3 r. ee -it di . .% �' c� -."'e � 111 m 4 "c rz �:t p ® ;IL: cc nl �J O L� 1 ,tç;;1Y; � N _ _v. E J w , O o==, °� � U J Ia u. a ut W 4 a. k m D a. ,p____,, )-1 „11-.12 0-,51. r ,. • B-38 ]OCno'otondi1 Iv11 ovule; II:IYIA:I■ ;MU u01 4191i10 - 9uOLD2 I 1- En (D n r0 a_5,6--d ¢ < m <¢z N �53HON N///��tl JI U^3) tl / \ � � yt 'a_ )Gm � z saa G•A, aF - d 4�� 4yj m 5 e i a is=a7:1"J I 1 C C C C t t - 'O � ssssss g- 5 C J- i .--i` 11.___ R CD n s 2 O qq co ra mx_ Q 0 D INS _I F cc a „PJF „8-.Si 0 I ..0-.EL • LL s _J < a e N _ _._...._ g' & C S g g = \\A i 7.ngn0'2,1 O?Jtl0 `viLIv UIe; U?"IAJH 'Ain (In, tL/NWtri - YIOIOZ III 0 n v, A yf Y N \ ZZ EL N 53NOH N V DlU 3 Ntl / ,N Uom t wa aQ� 1 '- 4 r to tn 1.11 ,:t I J n = 0 > z m- 1 in 1- a If u, 0 I- L U •Z 0_ LL. . i1 G J LL CC W a a . w F- . w 0- U • • B-40 • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:20 p.m. Steve Fowler November 30, 2010 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2010-00502 - RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES - The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for 31 single-family lots on 8.79 acres of land in the Mixed Use Low Medium Residential District (4-6 dwelling units per acre) in the Victoria Arbors Master Plan of the Victoria Community Plan, located on the northwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Long Meadow Drive. Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18449. On August 27, 2008, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18449. The California ' Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Negative • Declaration. Background: On August 27, 2008, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map 18449 for the subdivision of 31 lots on 8.79 acres in the Mixed Use Single-Family District of the Victoria Arbors Master Plan, located at the northwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Long Meadow Drive. At the time of the subdivision, no housing product was proposed. The applicant is required to develop within substantial compliance with the Victoria Arbors Master Plan, incorporating the architecture and design details of the Victoria area. This project includes 31 homes, which will complete the build-out of the • Victoria Arbors Master Plan. Requirements include side-on garages, recessed garages, and the use of porches is highly recommended. The specific architectural styles shall include enough materials, elements, and details that reflect the character of the style. The site was originally proposed to be utilized for a school, but the Etiwanda School District acquired another parcel nearby and relinquished this site. A Master Plan amendment was approved by the City Council December 3, 2008. This amendment changed the Victoria Arbors Master Plan land use designation from school to Mixed Use, Single-Family Low-Medium Residential (4-6 dwelling units per acre) on 8.79 acres of vacant land. Design Parameters: The project site is located within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan which has its own unique architectural design guidelines. The Victoria Arbors Master Plan requires that the overall character reflect a wine country theme with influences from France and Italy, such as English cottage or a bungalow style. The proposed homes are consistent with the required architectural styles and include floor plans that range from a 2,218 square foot plan to a 2,855 square foot plan. A total of 8 (25 percent) of the proposed house product will be single-story. The two-story plans have been designed with three floor plans and all the plans have three architectural styles. The proposed architectural styles are French Cottage, European Farm, and Bungalow. The French Cottage elevation incorporates horizontal siding below the gables, recessed windows; stone veneer wainscot, decorative shutters, and arched patio/garage/window openings. The European Farm incorporates decorative shutters, horizontal siding below the gables, stone veneer, and 2-inch by 6-inch fascia with rafter tails. The Bungalow style incorporates horizontal siding, vertical siding below the gables, stone veneer wainscot, decorative shutters, and shake roof style with rafter tails. The other two roof styles are flat concrete tile style roofs. • All four sides of all homes have articulation and incorporate decorative garage doors to match the architectural style of the home. Each of the three plans feature covered porch entries that range in size dependent upon the style. EXHIBIT - E 8-41 DRC ACTION AGENDA • DRC2010-00502 — RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES November 30, 2010 Page 2 • Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 1. The applicant has worked diligently with staff, but only 61 percent of the homes have side-on or recessed garages and the Victoria Arbors Master Plan requires 65 percent. • 2. The proposed designs of the houses do not meet the design regulations under RCMC 17.08.090.D2a (i.e. 360 degree architecture to all elevations). The front elevations include some elements that either disappear or are sparse on the side and rear elevations. Materials, such as siding, stone veneer, wrought iron, and use of faux shutters should be utilized on all elevations and in greater amounts to achieve 360 degree architecture. Long wall planes of stucco do not achieve this requirement and should be avoided. Architectural elements should be added to create visual interest, yet be authentic to the stated architectural theme. The applicant has added some elements to the housing product, but the elevations require more elements on walls with long areas of stucco. Finally, some of the front elevations should be embellished. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. The applicant has worked diligently with staff. Together with the Victoria Master Plan and • discussions with staff, there are no secondary issues. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: 1. Victoria Theme walls shall be installed per the Victoria Arbors Master Plan. The walls along the perimeter of the subdivision shall be slump block with sack finish and painted white with a slump cap. There shall also be unpainted slump block pilasters at a minimum spacing of 150'-0" with a pre-cast concrete cap. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee review the proposed design and provided additional feedback and input as necessary. Staff further recommends that the applicant work with staff and revise the elevations to meet the 360 degree architectural requirement that meets the City's architectural expectations. Following review of the revisions by staff, the project will be scheduled for review and consideration by the Design Review Committee. Design Review Committee Action: The Committee members reviewed the project and brought up several deficiencies in the design of the project. The Committee stated that the applicant needs to increase the percentage of side-on or recessed garages to meet the 65 percent minimum requirement. They also were requested to increase the porches and courtyards to 7 percent of the total floor area as required by the Victoria Arbors Master Plan. The Committee also requested that the applicant stage the plotting of the homes as they were not • staggered enough to create a variety of frontages. B-42 DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2010-00502 — RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES • November 30, 2010 Page 3 The Committee also stated that the architectural design of the house product did not meet the Victoria Arbors Master Plan requirements. The Committee pointed out that the architecture was "vanilla," and the use of interesting architectural elements was sparse and did not demonstrate a true representation of the architectural style that was trying to be conveyed. Another concern was that the architectural style was sparse as it moved from the front elevations to the sides and rear. The Committee indicated the elements that were used on the front elevations should be utilized more on the side and rear elevations. The Committee stated that the architectural elements and features, such as a hip roof, should be utilized to demonstrate the French influence in the French Cottage style. The Committee noted that the addition of elements, such as trellises, porches, balconies, and different materials, colors, and other design elements should be used to complete the required 360 degree architecture requirement. The Committee asked that the applicant work with staff on the issues and return to Design Review Committee at a later date. Members Present: Munoz, Wimberly, Granger Staff Planner: Steve Fowler • • • B43 • • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:30 p.m. Steve Fowler • January 18, 2011 • DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2010-00502 - RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES - The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for 31 single-family lots on 8.79 acres of land in the Mixed Use Low Medium Residential District (4-6 dwelling units per acre) in the Victoria Arbors Master Plan of the Victoria Community Plan, located on the northwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Long Meadow Drive. Related file: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18449. On August 27, 2008, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18449. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration. Background: At a Design Review Committee meeting held on November 30, 2010, the Committee brought up several deficiencies in the design of the project. The applicant was asked to make the changes and bring the project back to the Design Review Committee for review. The applicant is required to develop within substantial compliance with the Victoria Arbors Master Plan, incorporating the architecture and design details of the Victoria Arbors area. Requirements include side-on garages, recessed garages, exterior siding, and the use of porches is highly recommended. The specific architectural styles shall include enough materials, elements, and details that reflect the character of the •style. Design Parameters: The project site is located within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan which has its own unique architectural design guidelines. The Victoria Arbors Master Plan requires that the overall character reflect a Wine Country theme with influences from France and Italy, such as English cottage or a bungalow style. Design Changes: One of the items that the Committee requested to be revised was 65 percent of the housing mix to have side-on or recessed garages. The applicant has plotted 20 of the 31 homes with two-car side-on garages. They have also staggered the plotting of the homes to create a variety of frontages as indicated in the design guidelines. These homes are now staggered at the street frontage starting at a 10'-0" setback to a 28'-0" front yard setback. The staggering typically changes in intervals of 2'-0". The applicant has increased the architectural elements on all the elevations by changing two of the floor plans. The applicant has also increased the amount of stone veneer on the architectural styles that have incorporated stone as an element. The proposed homes with the two new floor plans are consistent with the required architectural styles and include floor plans that range from a 2,449 square foot plan to a 2,934 square foot plan. The previous submittal had plans that ranged from a 2,218 square foot plan to a 2,855 square foot plan. A total of 8 (25 percent) of the proposed house product will be single-story. The two-story plans have been designed with two floor plans and all the plans have three architectural styles. The proposed architectural styles are French Cottage, European Farm, and Bungalow. The French Cottage elevation incorporates horizontal siding at gables with roof styles that have a combination of hip and gable, •recessed windows, stone veneer wainscot, decorative shutters, and arched patio/garage/window openings. The European Farm incorporates decorative shutters, horizontal siding at gables, stone EXHIBIT-.F 8-44 • DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2010-00502 — RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES • January 18, 2011 • Page 2 • veneer, and 2-inch by 6-inch fascia with rafter tails. The Bungalow style incorporates horizontal siding, vertical siding at the gables, stone veneer wainscot, decorative shutters, and shake roof style with rafter tails. The other two roof styles are flat concrete tile style roofs. Each of the three plans feature covered porch entries that range in size dependent upon the style, and one style has a courtyard feature. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. • Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 1. The applicant has worked diligently with staff and enhanced all the elevations of each plan to meet the 360 degree architecture requirement. The applicant has added elements that provide visual interest to each plan as appropriate, and the applicant has also adjusted the plotting to satisfy the Design Review Committee's concerns from the previous meeting. Together with the Victoria Arbors Master Plan and discussions with staff, there are no Major Issues. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. The applicant has worked diligently with staff. Together with the Victoria Master Plan and • discussions with staff, there are no Secondary issues. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: 1. Victoria Theme walls shall be installed per the Victoria Arbors Master Plan. The walls along the perimeter of the subdivision shall be slump block with sack finish and painted white with a slump cap. There shall also be unpainted slump block pilasters at a minimum of 150'-0" with a pre-cast concrete cap. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee recommend approval of the project. Design Review Committee Action: The Committee members reviewed the project and agreed to recommend the item move to Planning Commission for approval with the addition of stone veneer on the front garage elevation of bungalow Plan 1. Members Present: Munoz, Wimberly, Granger Staff Planner: Steve Fowler • B-45 • RESOLUTION NO. 11-06 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. DRC2010-00502,THE DESIGN REVIEW OF DETAILED SITE PLAN AND BUILDING ELEVATIONS FOR 31 DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS ON 8.79 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF VICTORIA PARK LANE AND LONG MEADOW DRIVE IN THE MIXED USE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE VICTORIA ARBORS MASTER PLAN; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 0227- 171-29 AND 30. A. Recitals. 1. Richmond Homes of America filed an application for the approval of Development Review No. DRC2010-00502; as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 9th Day of February, 2011, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. • B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on February 9, 2011, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located on the west side of Victoria Park Lane, with a street frontage of approximately 680 feet on Long Meadow Drive and lot depth of approximately 350 feet, and is presently vacant land; and b. The property to the east, across Victoria Park Lane of the subject site is developed with single-family residences and is zoned Low-Medium Residential; the property to the south, across Long Meadow Drive is developed with single-family residences and is zoned Low-Medium Residential; the property to the west is Victoria Arbors Park and the wetlands; and the property to the north is developed with single-family residences and is zoned Low-Medium Residential; and c. The project consists of a Development Review of 31 lots within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan; and • d. The surrounding sewer, storm drain, curb, and gutter improvements are installed and this project will tie into those improvements; and B-46 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-06 DRC2010-00502— RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES February 9, 2011 Page 2 • e. The project conforms to the basic design and development standards of the Victoria Arbors Master Plan with required architectural elevations, slope requirements, and overall project density. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan by providing a variety of housing units that are compatible with the surrounding area; and b. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located by adhering to all setback, height, and density regulations that govern the area where these homes are being constructed; and c. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code in that single-family residences are an approved use within the Mixed Use Low-Medium Residential District of the Victoria Arbors Master Plan; and d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety,welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. • 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration in August 27, 2008, in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18449. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or(iii)new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. b. The Planning Commission finds in connection with the Development Review,that substantial change to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred, which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. The review of the architecture and plotting of the homes on the original Tract Map (SUBTT18449) were discussed and anticipated at the time of the original approval. Staff • further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, B-47 • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-06 DRC2010-00502 — RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES February 9, 2011 • Page 3 and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less-than-significant. The review of this project has shown that the homes are compatible in size and plotting as the other homes in the area, and the previous subdivision (SUBTT18449) adequately analyzed and addressed the potential environmental impacts for 31 single-family dwelling units. c. Based on these findings as evidenced in the record, the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of the Development Review. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the development of 31 single-family homes for Tentative Tract SUBTT18449. 2) Applicant shall adhere to all Conditions of Approval for SUBTT18449. 3) The applicant shall implement all mitigation measures adopted for • Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18449, as shown in Planning Commission Resolution No. 08-42. 4) All driveways shall have a maximum grade of 10 percent. If necessary, driveways shall be lengthened and the garage setbacks increased in order to achieve a 10 percent grade. 5) The site will be developed in accordance with plans on file in the Planning Department, as approved by the Planning Commission. 6) The plans submitted for plan check shall indicate stone veneer on the front garage elevation of the Bungalow Elevation for Plan 1. Engineering Department 1) Lots 1, 21, 22 and 31 side-yards shall be maintained by the homeowner(s). 2) Slopes on Lots 3 and 4 shall remain private property and be maintained by the homeowner(s).• 3) All pertinent conditions per Tract 18449 and the Development Agreements shall apply. 4) Provide 2-foot benches at the top of all 2:1 slopes more than 5 feet in • height. For slopes of 5 feet or less, benches can be 1-foot, measured from the face of wall; per the Building and Safety handout, provide 5 feet to daylight between wall footings and slopes. B.48 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-06 DRC2010-00502 — RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES February 9, 2011 Page 4 • 5) The Traffic Impact Analysis fair share traffic mitigation for improvement within the City shall be accomplished through the City's established Transportation Fee Program. The Traffic Impact Analysis fair share traffic mitigation for improvements outside the City limits shall be proportionally paid prior to each final map recordation. Fair share amount for Tract 18449 is $16,738.96. (Prior to the expiration of the Development Agreement, if not paid prior to this site will be subject to approximately 30 percent of the standard Transportation Impact Fees). 6) Public access to the adjacent Victoria Arbors Park is to be hardscaped and subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. Grading 1) Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall record a "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" for this project. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2011. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • BY: Luis Munoz Jr., Chairman ATTEST: James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R. Troyer,AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of February 2011, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: • ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • B 49 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Ned�, psi Net,;%.I STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2010-00502 SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW APPLICANT: RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES LOCATION: NORTHWEST CORNER OF VICTORIA PARK LANE AND LONG MEADOW DRIVE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 0. General Requirements Completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its /_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval,or in the alternative,to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or • employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 11-06, Standard / /_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The _/_/_ project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Notice of Exemption - $50 X B. Time Limits 1. Design Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not / /_ • commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. SC-12-08 1 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2010-00502 StdCond 2-9.doc B-50 Project No. DRC2010-00502 Completion Date - C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include / /ill site plans,architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors,landscaping,sign program,and grading on file in the Planning Department,the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, the Victoria Arbors Master Plan Specific Plan, and the Victoria Community Plan. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions /_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be /_/_ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.)or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code,all • / /_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/_/ including proper illumination. • 8. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all _/_/• lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 9. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall _/_/_ condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's • perimeter. 10. Construct block walls between homes(i.e., along interior side and rear property lines),rather than _/ /_ wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 11, For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. _/_/_ 12. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The / / 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. • • 2 • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2010-00502 StdCond 2-9.doc B-51 • Project No. DRC2010-00502 Completion Date D. Building Design • 1. For all residential development, provide conduit from each unit/lot and a pull box to connect to the _/_/_ street. Provide interior structured wiring for each house/building with minimum Category 5 copper wire, Radio Grade 6 coaxial cable, and a central distribution panel, prior to release of occupancy (fiber-to-the building, FTTB). Plans shall be submitted for Planning Director and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space abuts I_/_ a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide. 2. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth _/_/_ from back of sidewalk. F. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _/_/ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and . submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 _/ /_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. • 3. • All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater / /_ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq.ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq.ft.of slope area,and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 4. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously _/_/_ maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 5. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development / /_ Code and/or Victoria Arbors Master Plan. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 6. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the / /_ perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. • 3 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2010-00502 StdCond 2-9.doc • B-52 • • Project No.DRC2010-00502 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909)477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) G. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: / /_ a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans(2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams,water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (i.e., DRC2010-00502) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. /_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet"signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers'Compensation coverage to _/_/� the City prior to permit issuance. • 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. / / 5. Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can _/_/ contact the Building and Safety Department staff for information and submittal requirements. H. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be / /_ marked with the project file number(i.e., DRC2010-00502). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or _/_/_ major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees,Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permits issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map / /_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. 4 • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2010-00502 StdCond 2-9.doc B-53 • Project No.DRC2010-00502 Completion Date 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday _/_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. • New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. / /_ 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. / /_ J. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading / /_ Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_/_ perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/ /_ time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, / /_ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. • 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for _/ /_ • existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY (GRADING) SERVICES DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT, (909)477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: K. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, _/_/_ community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas,street trees,traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 2. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. / /_ 3. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or _/_/_ noted on the final map. 4. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the _/_/_ final map. • 5 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2010-00502 StdCond 2-9.doc B.54 Project No. DRC2010-00502 Completion Date 5. Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the _/_/_ City. • L. Street Improvements 1. All public improvements(interior streets,drainage facilities,community trails,paseos,landscaped _/_/_ areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to,curb and gutter,AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source _/_/_ of energy,fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council,except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings,structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: / / Curb& AC. Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail Other Long Meadow Drive X X X X x Victoria Park Lane (e) Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement • reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. (e) modify existing for local street connection. 4. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees,street lights,and intersection safety lights _/_/_ on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a _/_/_ construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. All improvements within the public right-if-way, including street trees, shall be installer per the public improvement plans. If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. d. Pavement striping, marking,traffic signing, street name signing,traffic signal conduit,and /_/_ interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City _/_/_ Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. 6 • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2010-00502 StdCond 2-9.doc • B-55 Project No.DRC2010-00502 Completion Date f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with /_/ adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash • deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving,which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan _/_/ check. 5. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in _/_/ accordance with the City's street tree program. 6. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed / I legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet (typically sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The Engineering Services Department reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer. Min. Grow • Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size qty. Victoria Park Lane • Chitaalpa Chitalpa 3-foot 25-foot 15 Fill -Parkway Tashkentensis o.c. Gallon in -Parkway Pinus Carariensis Canary Island Pine 8-foot 25-foot 15 Fill o.c Gallon in -Median Ginko Biloba Maidenhair Tree 5-foot 25-foot 15 Fill 'Fairmount' o.c Gallon in • Long Meadow Lagerstroemia Indica 'Natchez' Crape Myrtle Hybrid 3-foot 20-foot 24-inch Fill Drive -White o.c Box in Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 7. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with _/_/_ adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. M. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be / /_ submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos,easements,trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District: Lots A and B adjacent to Victoria Park Lane and Lots C and D adjacent to Long Meadow Drive. • 7 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2010-00502 StdCond 2-9.doc B-56 Project No. DRC2010-00502 Completion Date 2. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting /_/_ Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or • issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 3. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the _/_/_ developer until accepted by the City. N. Drainage and Flood Control 1. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map / /_ approval or the issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the _/ /_ property from adjacent areas. 3. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured _/ /_ from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. • 4. For sump conditions, the storm drain from the sump area shall have a total outlet capacity to handle Q100 and a secondary overflow shall be provided to handle the Q100 if the sump outlet is plugged at streets B and C. 5. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a blockage in a _/_/_ sump catch basin on the public street, and provisions made to pass through walls. 0. Improvement Completion • 1. If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, _/ /AI an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the City will be required for: Tentative Tract Map 18449. P. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system,water, gas, _/ /_ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. • 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. _/ /_ 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the / / Cucamonga Valley Water District(CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District,and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits,whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 8 • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2010-00502 StdCond 2-9.doc B.57 Project No. DRC2010-00502 Completion Date 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. _/_/_ Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from • them. Q. General Requirements and Approvals 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the Law Enforcement Community Facilities _/ /_ District shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the Developer. 2. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City,covering the estimated operating costs for all _/_/_ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall _/_/_ be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. 4. Provide copy of final Water Quality Management Plan with submittal of Grading Plans to Building and Safety. WQMP and Grading Plans are subject to review by the Building Official. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 0. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime /_/_ visibility. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • 9 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2010-00502 StdCond 2-9.doc B-58 City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2010.00502 ,� Building & Safety Department i 10500 Civic Center Dr. • Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 T: (909)477-2710 F: (909) 477-2711 GRADING COMMITTEE PROJECT REPORT& RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS Project No.: DRC2010-00502 Type: 31 lot residential subdivision Location: Northwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Long Meadow Drive Planning Department: STEVE FOWLER APN: Acceptable le Date: Planning C18,ommission:2011 By: Matthew Addington Acceptable for Planning Commission: Yes: xxx No: If NO, see COMMENTS below: • PRELIMINARY: GRC: January 18, 2011 By: Matthew Addington FINAL: PC Meeting: By: Note: Building and Safety — Grading will review and comment on future submittals for this project. A) STANDARD CONDITIONS - Standard Building and Safety - Grading and Planning Department standard conditions for Grading and Drainage Plans. • 1) Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2) A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3) A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4) The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5) A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 6) The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a • grading permit. I:\BUILDING\PERMITSISUBTT1844910RC2010.00502 Grading Committee Project Report#2,20110118.doc 1 of B.59 City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2010-00502 Building&Safety Department tre 10500 Civic Center Dr. ! Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • S T: (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 7) It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 8) The Grading and Drainage Plan shall Implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 9) All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 10) Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 11) The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. • 12) The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 13) This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. • 14) The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 15) Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations; i) The bottom of the over-excavation H) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; Hi) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety • I:\BUILDING\PERMITS\SUBTr18449\DRC2010-00502 Grading Committee Project Report#2,20110118.doc 2 of 3 B-60 City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2010-00502 • Building & Safety Department 10500 Civlc Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 • 7: (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 16) . Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. B) COMMENTS - The following items shall be corrected / completed, submitted to, reviewed and approved by staff prior to scheduling the project for a Planning Commission hearing. Copies of required easement/right-of-way documents, including legal descriptions, shall be submitted for review prior to obtaining final signatures. The review period for the above will generally be a minimum of two weeks or longer depending upon the adequacy and complexity of the submittal: 1) Please note that at this conceptual level a review of the accessibility access is not performed. It is the responsibility of the applicant to meet all accessibility requirements. • C) SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1) Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall record a "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" for this project. D) WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN 1) The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by Pacific Coast Civil, Inc. , dated October 25, 2010 , is deemed 'Approved." The following comments are required to be completed prior to issuance of a grading permit: 1) record a "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan". • I:\BUILDING IPERMIT5ISUBTT1844910RC2010-00502 Grading Committee Project Report#2,20110118.doc • 3of3 B.6.1 004. Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection `' 4 • District Kr dJ FIRE Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS August 9, 2010 Richmond American Brighton at Victoria Arbors SUBTT 18449 DRC2010-00502 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential projects is 500-feet. No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed • 200-feet. b. Fire hydrants are to be located. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: 1. At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential project from the public roadways. 2. At intersections. 3. On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. 4. As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District. 5. A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building. FSC-2 Fire Flow & Fire Sprinklers 1. The required fire flow for this project will be calculated in gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 2. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 3. Firewater plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are approved. • 4. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site. B-62 5. All homes submitted for architectural plan review after January 1, 2011 are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers in accordance with the 2010 California Residential Building Code and the current RCFPD Ordinance. FSC-9 Single-family Residential Sales Model homes require approved Fire District vehicle • access and water supply from a public or private water main system before construction. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS — Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard #9-8 All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. 3. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to • Fire Construction Services. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION — Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Public Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. 3. Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible • from the street. When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. • B-63 2 STAFF REPORT r • PLANNING DEPARTMENT L DATE: February 9, 2011 RANCHO TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CUCAMONGA FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2010-00724 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend Section 17.08.90.C.16 (Single-Family Development) by adding a general design guideline for single-story homes in new single-family developments within the Residential Development Districts. The project qualifies under State CEQA Guideline Section 15061(b)(3) because the proposed amendment is to add a design guideline and will not result in an intensification of environmental impacts. BACKGROUND: On October 27, 2010, the Planning Commission held a discussion on whether to formalize the City's current informal design review practice to require at least 20 percent of new single-family detached units within the Residential Development Districts to be single-story units. During the discussion, the Planning Commission suggested that a 25 percent set-aside would be more appropriate and suggested that it apply to the development of 4 or more single-family detached housing unit types. After the discussion, the Commission unanimously voted to initiate Development Code Amendment DRC2010-00724, and directed staff to process • the Amendment. ANALYSIS: Staff analyzed the appropriate section of the Development Code to add a general design guideline for single-story homes in new single-family developments within the. Residential Development Districts and determined that this guideline should be added into the Design Guidelines of the Development Code; specifically, Section 17.08.90.C.16 (Single-Family Development). Accordingly, the following guideline will be added: Section 17.08.90.C.16.p. is hereby added to read as follows: At least 25 percent of all single-family detached units in any single-family residential development in a Residential Development District consisting of 4 or more units should be single-story units. The number of single-story units may be reduced on a case-by-case basis when needed to serve the purposes of the Development Code and when justified by such considerations as location, lot size, and topography. The 25 percent set-aside applies only to the development of 4 or more single-family detached housing unit types, and does not apply to multiple-family projects. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under State CEQA Guideline • Section 15061(b)(3) because the proposed amendment is to add a design guideline and will not result in an intensification of environmental impacts. It can also be demonstrated with certainty that there is no substantial evidence that the text amendment to add this design guideline will have a significant effect on the environment. Item C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2010-00724— CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA February 9, 2011 • Page 2 CORRESPONDENCE: Since this item is a proposed text amendment with no specific project at this time, this item was advertised as a public hearing (1/8 page ad) in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution recommending that the City Council approve Development Code Amendment DRC2010-00724. If the Planning Commission recommends approval, it will be brought to the City Council for final consideration and action at a future City Council meeting. Respectfully submitted, t JaTroyer, AICP Planning Director Attachments: Exhibit A— October 27, 2010, Planning Commission Report Exhibit B — Planning Commission Minutes, dated October 27, 2010 Draft Resolution of Approval Recommending Approval for Development Code Amendment DRC2010-00724 Draft Ordinance of Approval for Development Code Amendment • DRC2010-00724 • • • C-2 STAFF REPORT • • PLANNING DEPARTMENT L DATE: October 27, 2010 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner SUBJECT: DRC2010-00724-CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA — CONSIDERATION OF A POLICY RESOLUTION REGARDING SINGLE-STORY HOMES IN NEW SINGLE-FAMILY DEVELOPMENTS. BACKGROUND: The City's current informal design review practice is to require at least 20 percent of new single-family detached units within the Residential Development Districts to be single-story units. The 20 percent set-aside applies only to single-family detached residences and does not apply to multiple-family projects. On September 22, 2010, the Planning Commission held a discussion on whether to formalize the City's current practice. The Planning Commission tentatively determined that 20 percent was an acceptable figure and directed staff to conduct a survey of neighboring cities to see if any have a formalized requirement for single-story homes. Staff conducted a survey of seven cities and found that five require a single-story set-aside. Of • those five cities, three regulate the single-story set-aside through the Development Code and two cities regulate the single-story set-aside through separate policy documents such as Design Guidelines. The Planning Commission is now asked to determine whether the 20 percent set-aside should be adopted as a standing policy or an amendment to the Development Code. In either case, the 20 percent set aside would, consistent with current practice, apply only to the development of 10 or more single-family detached housing unit types, and would allow for reductions on a case-by-case basis based on the circumstances of the project; such as location, lot size, and topography. If the Planning Commission determines that a Development Code amendment is needed, staff recommends that the requirement be incorporated into the Design Guidelines of the Development Code; specifically, Section 17.08.90.0.16 (Single-Family Development). For this to occur, the Planning Commission would need to initiate a Development Code Amendment. Specific language would then be drafted and brought back to the Commission for review before final action by the City Council. RECOMMENDATION: 1. If the Planning Commission determines that a standing policy is appropriate, staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution, which would establish a standing policy to require 20 percent of new single-family detached homes in residential developments of 10 units or more to be set-aside for single-story homes. • EXHIBIT - A C-3• STAFF REPORT / \ • Planning Department DATE: September 22, 2010 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner SUBJECT: DRC2010-00724-CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA-REPORT AND DISCUSSION REGARDING THE PERCENTAGE OF SINGLE-STORY HOMES REQUIRED IN NEW HOME DEVELOPMENTS BACKGROUND: The City currently has an informal practice to require at least 20% of the homes in new single-family development proposals to be single story units. At a recent Design Review Committee meeting, the Committee requested this practice be formalized. The Committee also discussed whether the 20% requirement was appropriate and whether the single-story unit requirement should be incorporated into the Design Guidelines (Section 17.08.090,C. Site Plan Design) of the Development Code. This matter has been referred to the Planning Commission for discussion regarding: (1) whether the 20% single-story home requirement should be formalized, and if so how; and (2) to direct • staff to study whether the single-story set-aside should remain at 20%. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission should determine if the informal practice of requiring 20% single-story units should be formalized and, if so direct staff to take one of the following actions: 1. Prepare a resolution 'for adoption by the Planning Commission that would establish a standing policy of requiring a percentage of new single-family residential developments be set aside for single-story homes. 2. Initiate a Development District Amendment to codify the requirement. 3. If the Commission decides that the single-story set-aside requirement should •be formalized, staff also recommends that the Commission direct staff to study whether the single-story set-aside should remain at 20%. Respectfully submitted, • • ir JameyR. Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT/CB/Is • EXHIBIT A fk-'; e;' C-4 • .. . Y`, ' ,. m N- 0 • N O) VC')') - N` co 1. 1 4FYi co co - N N c . N = Alzo,, T v _ co n .� co a. lcSS'-�' • (n o o too - to '_ '3: rn rn a) m rn M !C:aim CD CO CO r) O cc cci r O (D '= YL1 0 N- r V O m 'O-.i+, . .o to aw'. 0 oa a) m >, m o - m 'il �. o (a W E O fn _fa la c a) N -CI c = L HI ' N c a c O c C c kry C a) o LO Z a) a) . 8 O • a) Y co N C as c . O C a a) a) UU a) .c ay � .> W O u O O c i .O _c F ._ •,..-6 0 .c D O = N O 'O O O u a) N d m l a b = o > .CN E a) E K• j ) 8N O o a) O aU .E D O o ` O ,. O a O -° a ' m — o °. c o a m 92 > E o ca d E E E` C o > X ° ° m CD ° o ' E e d m " E 0 E o a) P c O r O y y a) O = O T O o E ' O C a) o- F m >` O icr) m Q)CL CC E Ii• SZ ° ° o ° re L o O aE Q )n N ()r c m a) a) c a)0 IIJP .m U N Y d 0 N V • a) C G ]N a) O N a a ON c MI, . - Ililani CO 0 TM !:>.y)�ay CC'Ft°9 ° co Co 0 0 N ° la Z . } } } } } Z . m 4.: T )t'S�,'1C. O a , 0 CI, m m y = o � i ca o c rum c � N C C O` cu ;�ttsC7' O = O cttn'� w tr 0 U 0 • 2 2 • !) EXHIBIT B 1 (.3 J `) - k\J C-5 • RESOLUTION NO. 10-49 • • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING DRC2010-00724, A POLICY OF REQUIRING A 20 PERCENT SINGLE-STORY HOME SET- ASIDE FOR NEW SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DEVELOPMENTS OF 10 UNITS OR MORE. A. Recitals. 1 . At the public meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on October 27, 2010, the Planning Commission considered the adoption of a policy requiring a percentage of new homes in new residential developments be set aside for single-story homes. 2. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, The Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds, determines, and resolves as follows: 1. All facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. The Commission hereby adopts the following policy: At least 20 percent of all single-family units in any single-family detached • residential development in a Residential Development District consisting of 10 or more units should be single-story units. The number of single-story units may be reduced on a case-by-case basis when needed to serve the purposes Of the Development Code and when justified by such considerations as location, lot size, and topography. 3. The Secretary to this Commission, or his or her designee, shall implement the policy stated in the preceding Section 2 and shall from time to time recommend to the Commission any changes that he or she believes are necessary. 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2010. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • BY: Luis Munoz, Jr., Chairman "'ATTEST: James R. Troyer, Secretary C-6 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-49 DRC2010-00724 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA October 27, 2010 • Page 2 I, James R. Troyer, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of October, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • • C-7 NEW BUSINESS C. DRC2010-00724 - CONSIDERATION OF A POLICY RESOLUTION REGARDING SINGLE- STORY HOMES IN NEW SINGLE-FAMILY DEVELOPMENTS - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. • Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. She noted that this request to formalize this policy is not for mixed use or multi-family projects; it only applies to new single-family home developments. Commissioner Fletcher noted that we had a prior informal policy and there has a problem enforcing that. He said we encourage developers to include single-story product, but we may end up with two- story product. He asked what the difference is between this proposal and the prior policy. Ms. Burnett said the first option would be to adopt a policy by resolution and the second option is a Development Code amendment. Commissioner Fletcher asked if the policy is enforceable. Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney, noted that many policies are incorporated into the design guidelines but are not absolute requirements and the ultimate discretion is with decision making bodies. He said the problem was that the 20% requirement was not written anywhere. He said by .adopting the written policy so everyone knows, and by codifying it; furthers the ability to uphold it as we could make it mandatory. He said if it is not the intent of the Commission to make it a hard cap it allows some flexibility for special situations if for example, the lo •size does not fit. He said there is functionally no difference between adopting the formal written policy or a Development Code Amendment. He said there is a practical difference in that if the Commission desires to have a Code amendment, the Commission would initiate the amendment and then it would have to go to • the City Council for final approval and it would be part of the Code. He said it takes more to get there with that option. Commissioner Fletcher confirmed that even if it is codified, the Commission could still make a case • by case exception. Mr. Flower said yes, and they could adjust the language in a resolution as well. He said the ' language that is proposed is not set in stone, and•if the Commission desires a mandatory 20% • single-story set aside, then that could be included. He said the language in the draft resolution • could also be adjusted. - Commissioner Fletcher said when the City had-the prior rapid build out, there was some desire for some flexibility, but now the City has a lack of single-story homes. He said there are not many remaining opportunities to get the right mix of single-story homes; this is 8 years too late. He confirmed that if we implemented a policy and if the property owners/developers entitlements have expired they would have to renew their applications and it would be brought up for review including their single-story set aside. Mr. Flower noted that the result would be the same if a Code amendment was in place. If an entitlement expired they would have to come back and comply with the current rules. James Troyer, Planning Director, also noted that this would not affect applications that are already deemed complete. • Commissioner Fletcher said he thought it should be a requirement and he would suggest a 25% • requirement for the development of 4 houses or more with flexibility to waive the requirement. Planning Commission Minutes -10- October 27, 2010 EXHIBIT - B C-8 • Ms. Burnett noted the survey of other cities included 5 units or more and they ranged from a 15-25% set aside. Vice Chairman Howdyshell said she is an advocate of single-story homes. She remarked that the • City is 90% built out and seniors want to stay here. She said she would like to see some muscle in the requirement and the builders need to see that we want to serve our community needs. • Chairman Munoz concurred with staff. He said he has wanted to have a policy, but was unsure of what the standing policy was. He said whether it be a resolution or codified as an amendment, it is irrelevant, and he is pleased that it is getting support from his fellow commissioners. Vice Chairman Howdyshell said she Would like to focus on a community that is 55+ development and/or single-story homes for what we have left for residential development. Commissioner Fletcher asked if a set aside of 25% for 4 or more would cause a problem and if there would still be some flexibility. He said he favors it to be more restrictive than not. Chairman Munoz asked if the Planning Commission would like a code amendment for a 25% set aside in developments of 4 homes or more. Vice Chairman Howdyshell said the more single-story homes, the better. Mr. Flower said that if the Commission opts to process a Development Code amendment, a public hearing would be required and staff would have to have to work out the numbers. To present to the Commission. Commissioner Oaxaca said he agrees that the Commission can send a strong message for what the City should have in this regard. • Mr. Flower noted that staff will have to bring this back with a draft resolution for review as a public hearing. • Motion: Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Oaxaca, to initiate a Development Code Amendment requiring a single-story set aside of 25%for new single-family housing developments consisting of 4 or more units. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE - carried R k h k i PUBLIC COMMENTS Ed Dietl thanked the Planning Commission as he is a big supporter of single-story homes. He asked if anything is being considered regarding the need for single-story rental apartments and condos. He said he would like rental units on one level. • R 4 k k COMMISSION BUSINESS James Troyer, Planning Director, said the land economics would be difficult for that to pencil out for • the builders. He said currently there is not a requirement for this and that requirement would be • difficult to adopt. Planning Commission Minutes -11- October 27, 2010 C-9 • RESOLUTION NO. 11-07 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2010-00724 TO ADD A DESIGN GUIDELINE OF REQUIRING A 25 PERCENT SINGLE-STORY HOME SET-ASIDE FOR NEW SINGLE-FAMILY DEVELOPMENTS OF 4 UNITS OR MORE BY ADDING SUBSECTION (p) OF SECTION 17.08.090.C.16 (SINGLE-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT) OF CHAPTER 17.0.8 (RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS) OF TITLE 17 (DEVELOPMENT CODE) OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Development Code Amendment DRC2010-00724 (the "Amendment"), as described in the title of this Resolution. 2. On October 27, 2010, the Planning Commission voted to initiate the Amendment. 3. On February 9, 2011, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Amendment and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. • B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds, determines, and resolves as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on February 9, 2011, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The Amendment applies to property located within the City; and b. The Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan, and is in conformance with the General Plan; and c. The Amendment will promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code by implementing the goals and objectives of the General Plan, protecting the stability of land uses within the City, and attaining the advantages resulting from comprehensive and orderly land use and resource planning; and d. The Amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. • 3. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA 0-10 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-07 DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2010-00724 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA February 9, 2011 Page 2 • Guidelines. The project qualifies under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) because the proposed text changes is to add a design guideline and will not result in an intensification of environmental impacts. It can also be demonstrated with certainty that there is no substantial evidence that the text amendment to add this design guideline will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, above, the Planning Commission hereby recommends adoption of the Draft City Council Ordinance, which would add Subsection(p.)of Section 17.08.90.0.16(Single-Family Development)of Chapter 17.08 (Residential Districts) of Title 17(Development Code)of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code and is hereby added to read as follows and as shown in Exhibit A of the Draft Ordinance. At least 25 percent of all single-family detached units in any single-family residential development in a Residential Development District consisting of 4 or more units should be single-story units. The number of single-story units may be reduced on a case-by-case basis when needed to serve the purposes of the Development Code and when justified by such considerations as location, lot size, and topography. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2011. • PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Luis Munoz Jr., Chairman ATTEST: James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R.Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of February 2011, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • C-11 • ORDINANCE NO. • AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2010-00724, TO ADD A DESIGN GUIDELINE OF REQUIRING A 25 PERCENT SINGLE-STORY HOME SET-ASIDE FOR NEW SINGLE-FAMILY DEVELOPMENTS OF 4 UNITS OR MORE BY ADDING SUBSECTION (p) OF SECTION 17.08.090.C.16 (SINGLE-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT) OF CHAPTER 17.08 (RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS) OF TITLE 17 (DEVELOPMENT CODE) OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Development Code Amendment DRC2010-00724 (the "Amendment"), as described in the title of this Resolution. 2. On October 27, 2010, the Planning Commission voted to initiate the Amendment. 3. On February 9, 2011, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted Resolution No. 11-07, recommending that the City Council adopt the Amendment. • . 4. On , 2011, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Amendment. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: 1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the above-referenced public hearing on , 2011, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The Amendment applies to property located within the City; and b. The Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General - Plan, and is in conformance with the General Plan; and c. The Amendment will promote the goals and objective of the Development Code by implementing the goals and objectives of the General Plan, protecting the stability of land uses within the City, and attaining the advantages resulting from comprehensive and orderly • land use and resource planning; and C.12 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2010-00724-CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2011 • Page 2 d. The Amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) because the proposed amendment is to add a design guideline and will not result in an intensification of environmental impacts. It can also be demonstrated with certainty that there is no substantial evidence that the text amendment to add this design guideline will have a significant effect on the environment. The City Council has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Sections 1, 2, and 3 above, Subsection (p.) of Section 17.08.90.C.16 (Single-Family Development) of Chapter 17.08 (Residential Districts) of Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby added to read as follows and as shown in the attached Exhibit A of this Ordinance. At least 25 percent of all single-family units in any single-family detached residential development in a Residential Development District consisting • of 4 or more units should be single-story units. The number of single- story units may be reduced on a case-by-case basis when needed to serve the purposes of the Development Code and when justified by such considerations as location, lot size, and topography. 5. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance-is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the final decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published pursuant to state law within fifteen (15) days after its passage, and this Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its passage. • C-13 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code 17.08.090 f. Provide larger side yard setback (i.e., 10-12 feet minimum) on garage side of lot • to allow vehicular access to the rear yard. g. Provide greater variation in front yard setback on larger lots (i.e., 2 acre or larger). h. Locate driveways as far as possible from intersections. Substantially vary front yard setbacks. j. Provide two means of ingress and egress, not including access. k. Orient buildings to focus on good views. Vary garage treatments such as detached and semi-detached, side and rear - entries, etc. m. On flag lots, use 12-footwidth for that portion of the driveway providing access to the garage to minimize concrete and maximize landscaping potential. n. Pair garages to create larger front yards, greater separation between driveways, and create variety along the streetscape. o. Taper three- or four-car garage driveways down to a standard two-car width at street. • p. At least 25 percent of all single-family detached units in any single-family • residential development in a Residential Development District consisting of 4 or more units should be single-story units. The number of single-story units may be reduced on a case-by-case basis when needed to serve the purposes of the Development Code and when justified by such considerations as location, lot size, and topography. 17. Subdivision Design. The proper layout of a subdivision's circulation, drainage, and lot pattern is important to the success of the project. The following guidelines should be considered: a. Provide two means of ingress.and egress. b. Use side-on cul-de-sacs, as opposed to standard cul-de-sacs, when adjacent to streets or pedestrian trails. c. Curvilinear streets are to be used whenever possible. Avoid a grid pattern. • d. Maximum 800-foot straight section to avoid long, straight streets. e. Spacing for right-of-way widths, street sections, street radii, and intersections are to conform to the Street Design Policy available from the Engineering Division. f. Corner lots are to be wider than interior lots. g. Relate lots and streets to one another to create neighborhoods. • h. Relate development to adjacent development relative to street design and lot pattern. EXHIBIT - A 17.08-53 C-14 / ' eCOneProject No. 9C2010-00502 Completion Date 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. / /- Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. Q. General Requirements and Approvals 2. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all —/ /- new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall —/ /- be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills,and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. 4. Provide copy of final Water Quality Management Plan with submittal of Grading Plans to Building and Safety. WQMP and Grading Plans are subject to review by the Building Official. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: R. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime /_/- visibility. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION - PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED 9 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2010-00502 StdCond 2-9.doc SIGN-IN SHEET PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING February 9, 2011 NAME ^^// COMPANY ADDRESS 4 #4/ We' U/24a7_i? ///'& fra f /lei 1///4I elf, t°6 �� /11Lr J