Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011/04/13 - Agenda Packet • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA / 'is (�\ PLANNING COMMISSION � J AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA APRIL 13, 2011 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California T. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Chairman Munoz Vice Chairman Howdyshell Fletcher_ Wimberly_ Oaxaca _ • I • II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES -4' H ' March 23, 2011 Regular Meeting Minutes • III. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2008-01012 -ANDRESEN ARCHITECTURE, INC -A Development Review Application to consider architectural and site plans for a 11,906 square foot single-family residence, an attached 1,668 square foot RV garage, a 1,359 square foot attached garage, a 2,101 square foot detached equestrian/storage/workshop building and multiple deck/patio areas totaling 5,339 square feet on a 12.42 acre lot located at the northwest corner of Amethyst Avenue and Almond Street on a site that is encompassed by the Very Low (VL) Residential District (.1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), Flood Control (FC) District and Open Space (OS) District- APN: 1061-501-03. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. • 1 of 3 tti I PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA S al APRIL 13, 2011 RANCHO CUCAMONGA I . IV. PUBLIC COMMENTS I This is the time and place for the general public to address the commission. Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda. IV. COMMISSION BUSINESS/COMMENTS I IVI. • ADJOURNMENT I The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. • I, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, • or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on April 7, 2011, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. inIf you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position,you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. • 2 of 3 • ��- `CyPLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA S APRIL 13, 2011 RANCHO CUCAMONGA The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The Planning Commission Secretary receives all such items. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS • Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m.to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,164 for maps and $2,273 for all other decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas and minutes can be found at http://www.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us • 3 of 3 Vicinity Map Planning Commission Meeting April 13 , 2011 A i..J I c ;; E E a c c 1 u L € >• o. U Q 2 2 a) t/ j - l _ w e N �� ? v I „ 15 co NI 0 r ` ■ Al_ _ 19®t I. - Base Line j L r i , Base Line n A�� Church Church ti i 5/4 Foothill '` �� ../ M. Foothill Arrow 1111111111 �i � 1 Arrow a, c c C .° Jersey z , m 8th E t" / 3 coi a / ( ui 'Ai m / t t9 6th% n c aci I 6th N L C a Y I 4th Q z X 2— iiii 4th 9 * Meeting Location: City Hall • 10500 Civic Center Drive STAFF REPORT I '� Q94 • PLANNING DEPARTMENT Li- J RANCHO • CUCAMONGA DATE: April 13, 2011 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Larry Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2008-01012 - ANDRESEN ARCHITECTURE, INC - A Development Review Application to consider architectural and site plans for a 11,906 square foot single-family residence, an attached 1,668 square foot RV garage, a 1,359 square foot attached garage, a 2,101 square foot detached equestrian/storage/workshop building and multiple deck/patio areas totaling 5,339 square feet on a 12.42 acre lot located at the northwest corner of Amethyst Avenue and Almond Street on a site that is encompassed by the Very Low (VL) Residential District (.1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), Flood Control (FC) District and Open Space (OS) District - APN: 1061-501-03. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: • Site - Vacant Land -Very Low Residential (VL) and Open Space (OS)/Flood Control (FC) North - Vacant Land —Open Space (OS) South - Single-Family Residence and Flood Control Facility - Very Low Residential (VL) and Flood Control (FC) East - Vacant Land and Flood Control Facility — Flood Control (FC) West - Single-Family Residence —Very Low Residential,(VL) B. General Plan Designations: Project Site—Very Low Residential (VL) and Open Space (OS)/Flood Control (FC) North - Open Space, South - Very Low Residential (VL) and Flood Control (FC) East - Flood Control (FC) West - Very Low Residential (VL) C. Site Characteristics: The project site is located on the north side of Almond Street at the terminus of Amethyst Avenue, on a 12.42 acre site. The site is made up of multiple zoning districts, with the developable portion of the site (Very Low Residential) encompassing 3.2 acres. The residence to the west shares an access driveway off of Almond Street that is entirely • on the applicant's property. The lot drains roughly from north to south, with an approximate elevation change of 200 feet from the north to the south property lines. The lot is bordered by existing single-family residences to the west and to the southwest on Gooseneck Drive; undeveloped land outside the City boundary to the north; and, San Bernardino Flood Control land to the east. ANALYSIS: • A. Entitlement Requirement: The proposed single-family residence is located within the Hillside Overlay District which requires approval of a Hillside Design Review. The Planning Director Item A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2008-01012 —ANDRESEN ARCHITECTURE, INC. April 13, 2011 Page 2 may approve a Hillside Design Review when grading is limited to cut/fill totals below 5 vertical • feet and 1,500 cubic yards. Above this limitation, approval is required by the Planning Commission. In this case the project proposes up to 12 feet of cut. B. Project Description: The applicant proposes constructing a 11,906 square foot single-family residence, an attached 1,668 square foot RV garage, a 1,359 square foot attached garage, a 2,101 square foot detached equestrian/storage/workshop building and multiple deck/patio areas totaling 5,339 square feet. The house was designed to work with the grades on the site with the 1st floor/RV garage tucked under the main living area. The design is within the required building envelope and all retaining walls conform to the related height limitations. The applicant, though, was unable to minimize on-site grading to meet the 5 foot cut/fill limitation necessary for Planning Director approval. Because of the size of the proposed improvements, a large amount of grading is required. The applicant has worked to balance the amount of cut/fill, with the project requiring just 238 cubic yards of fill. Stepped retaining walls were used along the north side of the residence in order to construct the driveway. The faces of these retaining walls will be landscaped and irrigated, with the areas between the retaining walls planted with shrubs and ground cover to soften their appearance. The house will screen these retaining walls from public view. The house is architecturally compatible with the neighborhood and conforms to the design guidelines outlined in the Development Code, including carrying materials and architectural features to all elevations. Lot coverage will be approximately '10.5 percent of the developable portion of the site, which is below the maximum 25 percent permitted in the Very Low (VL) • Residential District. The applicant will widen Almond Street and install the required Community Trail improvements. The applicant has worked hard to balance the requirements of the Hillside Development District and the homeowner's desire to live in a very large home. On-site grading has been reduced to the greatest extent possible, with the house tiered to the existing slope and retaining walls integrated into the foundation of the house. Additionally, the large lot size helps to mitigate the large footprint of the project, with roughly 9 acres of the 12.42-acre site left undisturbed. C. Committee Review: The Design Review Committee, Grading Committee and Technical Review Committees reviewed the project on March 1, 2011. Each recommended approval by the Planning Commission as presented. The Trails Advisory Committee (TAC) reviewed the project on March 9, 2011. The TAC recommended approval of the project with the following conditions: 1) that the Community Trail and public right-of-way have a maximum cross-slope grade of 4 percent or less; and 2) that the applicant will work with the Engineering Department to rework the trail entrance to the west of the existing driveway to the applicant's property. D. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City ' staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to aesthetics, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, hydrology and water quality and noise, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. • Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been A--0` PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2008-01012 —ANDRESEN ARCHITECTURE, INC. April 13, 2011 Page 3 • • prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. Staff has not received any letters or phone calls expressing concern over the application. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Hillside Design Review DRC2008-01012 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions. Respectfully submitted, ve Jam R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT:TV/Is Attachments: Exhibit A - Reduced Set of Development Package Exhibit B - Aerial Photograph of Site Exhibit C - Design.Review Committee Action Agenda Dated March 1, 2011 • Exhibit D - Trails Committee Action Agenda Dated March 9, 2011. Exhibit E - Initial Study Parts 1, 2 and 3 Draft Resolution of Approval for Hillside Design Review DRC2008-01012 • /9--3 N 11 1 , `;' � 1 FF �. r r-; r t't S!i 1 1 i II 1 /Ii111 '�•., I I ! 1 I Ill I t 1 3t11ti ttt 1 III !:°1{1{l S , ,, ‘:f....,, ,-+ _ i 14 1 ; ii[i1Q Sts I 1: _ ee I 1.111;111! 1.111t�mti11 N r.+ I ; r 1 i F iRe �i S P 6 »t»>��iiiififff9i3333 0_ ;- 1 � M hit hkIihIiàIIIiiiIthJIIIIIrIIIj1 � i-+• �''•+V'` • ' ! ::�. r.J 11'� c 4�a t, rli 1111 1911 glf A II ( LIJJhh1I! 1111111 .1 -- III' '. • Wjg $ t 6 go y 1 iiii di d i 1 1 ilk _ - i 1J 11; i .1,1_, r Air tai il olo r • ii A IS r r 1 _ lt.Z..'...• a - c . r . r + 441.} r fir U `r I cu -, 0 r% 1 .4 , W _ iA t e a ',1 - , ; 'NO. 4ri \3... :..,17. ,..: .7.1'.,,,,s si Z• ' 4' '*4'N. 4•• r 1 .mss. '7 ,*i z rte' 47 ' ,7--. - . . . uat . . • •.0-04-i. u Vim•`::�vJ_: , i 1.1 r 4 • t ' 0 t 1 I EXHIBIT A /4--q 1 r cif-r+ ".1.1H onws-31I-+01 a4 kr.7mIllso+•rlwf 1 Ild filfiQ I t 6Nb S r• V3S , ti ( ee, N ri'S. \ems, f;,* q h. ;- -- ii —x— —, .iF L € e L '°m-'�' Ni+i'«A F:q7 �-e1+'q et 4 li$.I eel el` gc 1• rIt L 5 f Erb iQi 1Q°1S 5 •••+++��� v 'Q „ .. i a €F r e ease ai.E`€L Fs i1R e r '7 1 ; i'li i {s f !Y ' s €1 i 3�`.f E FP v°€€flees i° [E r •/ S c g� i, ra �t i -( v I f 4 �. .. 5 i p liii ill 0 I °+ e b 1R') i ,'!- \ 1 Y f LQ ' i LQ!iQ 4• t w v,� m 27 ti- '� F�� ■p, ti �s " A ri; Qee Mill III `4 fY `114, U' c t' -- t\�-,� 9 . s" II ID 1 &I sa sf1fsl s-zia-;pes I/1 a I �' e a *- 1 ariRi iI,c j a gk 9° lip1 pi a° E , 3 Fl1 ®1 i s "'.l @I i F l fglEE 9Q°p+3°�s tfd y [.�5e 6 1 'I EYF e ¢• � 7 • c ti1 -7 • `' t , lit:i 1 fj !�rt�$; I) i _r - ;- Li.';‘% _ ii i . 7 —51-- i 7 a/ / II, r-It ■ IL fix` \ �'€ �e'"gh,s-1S14111k4ktli@ _ C' _—__� — - . \\` e¢ 11 W ti. ;"4:1-4 a—€ yg§ I I a 1 ` 1 e�f V' s �� �_�e� i� R 2 ¢a�€' iw y 1 / � B 7`i"1 Ill `' � ! y g kI� 11 ® �g @ R=a� _ �! ° ��E,:S'iP 1 _ !1 lf < Ip'g a tl 4�S �iJ.,� lf 33 �Y S� A///////1!111I —e—e�lissi � 4Qa '' Mil -. _ 'fib eF 11 i r x -S.I x Alt P . :/y1§ r_ n 11 E a 'S E ' s€ € II 1 t�YCQ i 1i 1e ° 1 P P h SdR eE8 i R' P. p 1 r 1. i v FF e I t S Eg g ([E Q ! Q. p 1 + : r 1 €tFi $i gEi'1 �ie l6 Ei @l lei B9 EEe E 1 iieEai•'. I88iii ile PO _J I hi '\ 1: cf45d%Yn ! ig i 1`' ----:>:::/r1 �j: I t'11‘14.1:' 91 ( e 'A' _. �. , 1 ll iii Mai I r. 1:. ( III ' i :•I II!' I i M I 1 u . � is i11 4111111 I , , 1 , '€ ai 11'il■A ii ;ill{ 1 !i+!�✓110! i Ott a Ps .1 1 P i€EI ti °s E . Elib, II 10111 1 i QE F 1 E Eli I: 1 I mr� I!illroi N.! Q III a 1 a 5 E1 J 1 1 t$- f 1 +� I I g IPE \ E R i i"' k, I+ �� �f z IWAI II, '14,11 ,'1 I -1- -i ` e i i E le,�\ \ E ',Iii F� { I INAli I 11 IQI I ' 1\\ °\ iiii S r w\ J c - \-.� $;it 1 - � 1I 4 iI�ImIIIRIn—A,NIh / ` 1 I € yg `1 6i � \ i 1 F '? g \ I I I ' € 6pS �s I ! . JR `fix >� /( 19 �/€� .[ .._Siie6,�� '_ �\ 1 ®: 1���0, r II y i di11 011/19 it- __ r `: 1 I ` e S L / - _ EE— -' I I c t lik T le' ) .f ,��� I'i- ! 35 a11� V.,'Pi' Ep�\@ .1 / T.__ I e,IF, i I 4_ I. ,, `\ 4 B f ' 'iii - 7 ` I Oi I l-��l' 'f I ..II! e,:1 l Lei e 1 11 / / 1--__--, _-_-_,-.43,21 ! �— f1 e Hill /9-5" uu.Mf 01 �'^'g1'gl'3-rr- 5F� W N1'Iivi siI llvlq'll 1tiJ tinaincurrt1 en a. • r° ,Y al, . I 1 - .. i w d\ t •.�% Its ' 1 . , s u 6;1,.•m. • F 1 4 $16666.IbF��)1 ` I,I; 6 f:.I ce.14.°fir` ...1. Fd` 3 l!ih ! I f @ v __ ' _— • . v `` _ a:: v M •4y qF SSE I� , I -401 -e- 1 d."..0- . i r_ nr 1 , ........: ..., ,,,,, : • ,. • pe 7 . q ii/Sdi_i,:#'1 ' 7 ,I a r1 a ;i ,A, —P I6l\ t , p n F, 5 cot la al d i • 9/ VS I In A—ea w:mv-wwi-mn. 'wan:-Trml»�..�a NdvrvsOk^.1P.: rca:rn:oirtnYU:r 2:- , 1 = •1/4 Z - ,, --- cc, ..• ... . ^:. r'E; 1/44 Td. [':: ".3. te.,1 ":•—, "4 1 Ci i Its'\'4Z; lin ,i (1." 5 0.■ • ... C I rg;t IC oFFZI = 1 !t •- .. o--• __ mimm'SkttiViolli‘'. \ alO• b 1, Ff.,. i .91 i, ; 1 ' ,sboo, %N... '.4 ‘ti1011 if g „,.... .. L a 121 U1141 a ‘.. e. ' 1 On /--- -• . SIN tr.....t," , ..... — . ; U' 0 iti4m a)1111 I <4•,,.,.,,;=1 :\ya` , I Mr' / , , 1 :.:5 ',,.).,,reo,,,t,,,,, -..,,,--_-_,:-...0,-d,--• tk‘1 7 7 / ., , , HI 1r . • 0 . . -, , . • -2 -.- . . P. - ,..-- .-- , . ; 6 A-T1 I I;I It It.ciitchttl 2 � - '1/4', a, o- ,/ c 4 O O • ,~ I ry ._ o _c a :_, w 4'. - w _,- F. _1= ZS 1 T. e E I k I. ibik. I c. 1 � I I °II 1aIt % 'i 5p' . ° , °e BiR3 t I ° �.I , I 4..„ 1 ° °J��9g11a� �#. III 0 NLe 1�_ �t / �q' 1 a = ai° 0 4, _ r it ° ®, i3 e�� i ,; ° , �J�fl;i rfr1 � ' u— ° ° �i i 1�om ipl 0 ; .4 1 ; IIIi �i ee ,1 WII j� it MINN i I � � ° i�I Errata I1 oe ° n N 1u® ' , 1 e , 4 . 1 . il j r IIli 4 �: i e ! rj.1 1�11 o� i I N• � ra i"ye a 1F ;s1a, N "" ,� :` �� . _� i1 I—. >I c ,✓. c I A r�t' 4 o .- i °ob el �l .,a•tlu�� � � 1 • 1 11 ` d ° 44 2s i ° o eol yi 1 I I i II 1 1 , ! t i • 1 /T O O rc �vi m,J T: ,nJ o I • z0 + 1 e o c. E , tt �, Z. 5 = xx .. � W■N $ z t t it S I.� ,„ti I ' + ; o e pit l j ' , � ® " Ill! ° ° rJ' ! 1 I I ¶, j4 I I.e ;J d Y �I tlit III, o _ ° 0 4: it 1' 4i1j�` II ; li j /ail, II ! °fie i J ' 1 i r "� i I . J 014 ta 1.4 iii7r1 INM e il�11 i 1 1° I, ;?I : 1j III a1 1 i' � II .4 1 dI�,lllf � � I ; /Qz i,l j j ° I� \\ �� :0. �1?"� I'o iii I"IamR 000 e o Vs a° O le �° o.. °, LII. °I°1 III I al 1 1 II I 'w o--� air 11 III 1 oI �I 1 — I I I III 1 la 1 I1 el SI I „ I . I I I II 11 °jt; 13 I <<N;i3O"11 , I I 1 1 111 I W's ° ° I I III I • 'r s 4 1-1-- ■: C a.) *) 4' 4) . .. .. , .... ., , , ..e, , .... . .,: ...,„ 4...., ;4 ‘fs .,' 0 a 0 S in g ,... , .•„..), -,:::.- r...9 i g , • I-- 0 i zi,o•cn< c..:, Ict•z ,*-• iz , , • ,—:-, .:,,•, _.„.,,..• 4--,t--- 11 rtari 11 il I _. ..,....,:iiii•Fgt uoii z•ic'ili•il 11 4 s..- --.[!----...1h-,,u ii 1 1 di 11 i•,t"x.,..bytireici, strA6‘Eq4, tus:54.7;., i• • - "•'.:„.. 1 ti t • ,g--4ifY'LS' —....• IP -,•-.: 1111 1 11411 11 lig111-11- 1 11 tIEL:1-10.11/"-;-47,101ril '3=2151 14ti,r--galggggiskii i i .. g, ,11111t 711Q1I. ::;-~t:iratirCI 617.Ill il -- Vbre31;!:1 i ,.. .„,....:,,,,, , , „,„ ,..,:.,,,... ,.... ,, ,,.....,... _ ,,,„:„...... 4 .,, , ,..rt... .,,- :.... I -.7-Tri Ao 'lb pli-m4; . 4.1..-...L -•,.,- • i, 1r111 II Inste----- -W:....4.11:411.111 1111 11111 [ •11 1 I 111 il LIC.4.1.'"k.. . 5.7.4,1110:1!i„It LI t I 1 'lir 1-,-. .4al ..,01011; :III'JP 1 l'111111--F 1 lillif 1 I ir(4! 11111 ii,..-,. -•• 11 : i , illw.w.pwret-7- ,lit oli,iill II Lc II e....:.;_ ,..-—. parg w• ----.: [.. i• ij 1::en.%•4?..."a“.11S,c,k;\ .v, ij;:: .•-"‘-c•' --5.•^4.IA II IL i ,1111E- err.sa _ICE:EN • -41,+*: .4'411 . --- tir-1, - . 7- .stM:::--.7;...\•••1 i;I lit;4;,-'5111,14_,- .:-_,I 4*,/ti.4t tit, -.`"--3C-44:_t_-2...1,..,..".: ------ -.-. 4.‘t.'. •1 I Ulf i ,. ta i if • .,,,,,,, •..a‘..--- ffir:a-.-•-•=-s-v I'll 1 It ........._rois—.: gilltt•1 It tr-.--,.. •:.4-4---,0.-cc, 7.,,,,,,Th.,,IA... tat- - u(gip +, 1 li yr: ,Ey•••A,.;,-,124- N11 ii•hi III.1 II r • Fad:. tr...44-giliitkilid 11111 i PiIPP P 1 1.1i..:1.1.1E•a. 7-,-4.1414.1F:0L'A•=.E-11,.1i1iIi1liffiiItlI,:illii.pil1l 111,,h1 l 120[1iiUlIl II 1q1, • ' I L1111 i-rm,P1112,1-t-rthr---eglinfiIiii11111 t•tilt II!, '1 ziro'.„-±,-;.■ , t.0.,..:@,41w.itiolitfpat111,1r4411,.fr,11111! !par..-,-,-1.1t-,1;f2„.!9!1;1 ,Ornmimp"tpicr,-;t4t.ifyira-.-4.pmqvi tr,(4.10.rty:ffp.b..-Trlip pi 1 •0911111;ilidittx4z-gtigtaate.009,Eg.rtizmitii:ptill : t ..ft.V.,-tzta•EgEtrttztamal-a.- 2.st..-2 7-4E'71'4 '. g , . ..3111jilliiiihnEr. F.Tra.t11-Isil.mazia-w...E,9;•91E1311.1!111111[11111 i g ...apx...07.4-a?..,1,. .. ..p.. ....s.:=r-7:72.,:Rw.e1yily1fo 11 .,....„-•:11,11'i:11111.121.11M115F1g111,1111;1a1[11g-+.1211111.1.41i1n1:14.1.11W.Sc.1161.1111101111i111 1116-11.1111117111-0.1,111,1,111a41:=F111.)1iili114.11-1f11111.-14.1.:11.11.1,1 •1111. 1Aw.:T11,14-i1=11.17-0.11 11111111111!1illi1:11,111,1e.J111:141111‘,11F1111.2111:114i:L;1.,14[1141,11,11. 11:5.11.121i 111!:"1"------'.7:) ,..-;`;:iNi..u.!..111-:,,, ,-4,--,-" Ci.v. .11.1a1.-111:1:1.. .1.:141.71.<7.11,51111...;11.111F:a11t11:eztOli.i1thihliiPinii11 0,14 c:1--14-1(11;:i2td t:;;;,(.,;■:',(.:54,t.■;;;?;g :.4-ti-14-::1::t4J-1 ti$4,4•::1-ztti.t-....,. ••=:._,,,,,Ltkittt-t,4 L" ------ - -1 •,\;;;::•/;•tt::::-,11:71,7•11- ..;;:.••••),,x-::::- 0 • 0 Art 0 cc, fl FFi.' lit a �u�f% l I to U i/�n1ii hi 1,11Ea214, a. (I c o o U \ l^.j 5 'll;'dF P1PlilalllP li� ! a N ry V.. •ti " _ ill1!ll Qlii tt fF! r' : u•( !:'#FP{,JFi a i c.3 � ,11�.171 Fi_ let @: PiE ea F z ' O �� e� 2 S i \ I _.i rill 7!hi ¢a a LL.£ - wec < cs i� 5 LL C - B `y e pp W W A \ 1 I T — i -� = ( j c T ` rte ) y ) k -,....)- N\ -1 ) `c ' P-) \\ATI i i (5- .�' o r -3F8 i i �� i j ` : mac` 0,4 0____ oi . Iol . Ly � — t� ) ; d . ` o il.ffith l t i id I T e i:,y'1i a , el l -) ;alllrr.Mt €8 I I E Rs y p,i F 3NOZ w tPa{i I 1 I 2.3N07 _.. I i i i. i F 1 i f • E I 0 * e--1 • 0 . x Z • 0 a • • • I i - EZitt;(;';‘,...: A,i 1 l C, 1 c y J o a � - J. it tr..,: - . . _ • v, . , , , . .,. . . , , • , 1 _ T' 3 C lit• jIi 4 Q F SSS . , 111 r x 4 p )� ! i € o'bkli ,. ►` . ! ��v� t rr " ♦ o .... f .... ____ ____,:,..I _ —....abalalmilil i " _ ,, , f_ — _'t7 Ii! I i ,'` `` I1 Q -, r I 1 illiki il . • .. 44 •9• @ i o 114 1 il'd Ei510tt 1/ ,vt,l'lf-164dn-..11•MIN,•LfbtllnwwW AIVIJ+11...,1 IN.PI I o :•.1,111 Y. 3 �� 1 04.11{i1' 1 `° I - Pali Ill ',", ,18 z !pElg�geE j !i fl ; �i OP! e; 'Fis I 1 � � � �1� 1 i� ;1 �dl x l ,i�6ll pi p g • E ! 1 S !I ; !1 c �9 .4 p - d > ! ! a g a � y'� 0 .li .I w. 9i = °°° 11 Il�l1 1d1yh� Q11� � i 4 5811; e 1 !� ! I! a1T ` ^. I§ F4il�11 lEf/ IFii"!40�r @:a �41 t1 lE I" _I E .I II!1 hi@ 13f!1 iF!a 1 !i ill li i„ a O j.L d g la 1.! ! i 74 g D4 . iAihititilleii.' p O Q E ! I E! !Ohl § 1 a 01111. v I1Iff !I 1I 1 I . 2 g 5t, .j i��P � �g:; 11 s l s )i�IgSa,�' �F = 1 1E. �, I• F II I 1! .i8l 1i i � 1_" 1 a y,I • E i i i g ' I f `i i I( iq 1 61 CII!! Ie a�° z a °+.g�� �liiE �![ � 1 ! 1! I I r li l tiIjb °�� ,a+ g e e6 � �11 1 161111 I ;� I -¢ g�� ii e i a1e 8111/(11p$�@ @gii ill'f 11111 ! la E !°! I ri . 1!1 11 E6/Ejj[�ap py11 qn I #q A!F 4e $fit a1 !i¢°a 1F1 _fa 111 �i i !: l�ii [gE 1 S=!1 i;lF! Pet I! 1!!n @1Ft i R " 1 11Yd eetal! ! ! Ji!flil II ! !! r ! i !I! e !1 �1 °I e M F 111I 1 R ie E i 1111 ! ri�i� 1111!! 611 1 i+�cj p d`� I= �! ! s �� 3 5_ '� 1• �1 a[ 1 F11 6t i 1 I 1� IE1 11111 1'1 R Fg 1 111 19 t - p1 1 1 rl I I E 1 I na 1.�!!°a ie a ! B! ! I ! �' r I �If U,• t it"11 n s° i n i , 1 1 H!1 11 I I a, I z elEppl '�1 '!� ° °1 ° e1 d ph,111 1!as1 1 € 1.' 1 ..i ., z:!e �11 1a . 1141°111$1 a1 I�ig814( 'E�11 e c 1 11 n 1 .. Ii11 ,111 !11€111111111 a IIIIR1p II .11 1 11 1 i i !I 1 Y : ! l I1 I I I4 111111/11g1 r'11' ''i{ii'111 11 i 1 MI II I I Ili �a E 111 `R 11911111/10011101 ! 1f IR1 48.9ey p 1 di r.l,' iAiwl+e z O & _ �.I a� a a .d a1 1 a ataa$a: ill i1 ►.z s^ € i � r� - i r i 4� - ---••- :\ •T i 1\F--,� �` !-;–;i--1 i ' I i al w i 1'04 i ?.i. { -y— — 11 11=a la 1 111 6.m ! r,—!• ^s:-r i _ �, Q / i'41-1111 \ --—- ¢411 I11 11111{�1 11 zr.D w• \ e: e 1 \' n ! G1ta:B ! y '*-* ' ,� l glf,. \ - f_ •�, '.. /I F e 1 i 11 .j1 it C ,z+C 4 F ' t \ '. \ `4' !_ i' 1111 f' = �/i , -\ EE 1,1 ei S1 •• (� .s O igs.. ,;,\K Y L `` ..E , r I. 7! �Q . t t i_7_. ` E 1 \` 3 - . . ce +it'ri __i-I—.i / 1 QQQil Pb 7 �� v / �a• s� y ��_ +�1/4 f�� 1 I + e R e R e C �1_�` 1 ✓t LM �-R R `'•. w :fie 1 1 E - E i i '. 1 llly1y11�1. A [ N' TA; rf ':.° .e M . '� ' 1'...1 rl I 'Si n11Fi 1° I ! a y �// I.',.' )) 424.:1 r _ `,�•, V. s I L. yyy������yyy � .2rt t 1//,' L''.:.•.1,� 1_, • _) .-1 .- L f.----4.-- �.- •.6 .. a 1 - __.` R -! S mac,. __——_..-rlir tfj E I I I w , I e - 1 -v —,- 1 lit 1 e i ( ' 11 1 = .. — -- — . '4. t. 1 1 d' r ` 1 I , it Isl 11111111111 I . I I - F! 1i Ii1, ! i • i 111I I 1 1 1 i 1 iiii I • I 1111 $ 1 t tI 1 II Ji h ii IIh ill illi 3 Wi4,11-lw.!,->....n-..irw•A7wo1A.....R7 kIY1Z_•l••+`..limm I ICI rS Si NG 7�/tI .. ,., ,,„.... •„ , a• =J pii 'ir” , IIiI' t.., ____z„ may:.,::'' ;. ',i pi, "E rte ,. ��� ! -� ��ii�1�11111111�11�1h��'��JlljllllhP f�NIIIIIIIIII1 E,„"! _S:r.: � �/� mil'_=J�/ ( 0. �r� ''�I��I/((ffS��� r%'� (�ljj`�}C���'` �b�f�k ���1�11'rY�1l a 3� z' tt)Jr `_.�r�.T�/' % �`':fl--`Jj*ilrrpt iE3 k►' aCCS Ct I 10... c, , ,,,....\ - 1,-,1,---r.,....i...4....-,--.7-4,.._ ...,..„, „ory, liti a'. i i r v,�`'.,� \\c;rr :�-. S`I111 '�� — ],"cites r a�r'.'1r . ° 2��JJ' irrr� T ti ', . «lfr �0p-� r 1'k\.\11..-------_-=-144 ..,_ �Jlll 1 ter- .:/ Jib'" p�iia 4-4 r!� ) N v/! % tin opo/r i/�/y ra 01 „N,, ,__:, ` ���/r �, ` ~a, FCdit Z�i 19ti 1jb�r�/��Il/�fl ��., tl�l '11: 1 U c _, Ay f.r:Ape ar,"!\�f ��//� !,;,.„;�:,:.:.'4.1 11�I e it i IHLk[ z f�e 1 1 1 ,i Jik!![Ji#iJiii lies sees a i" i 11 1 Mallilld I 11 1 1 I d 1 m 1 ill 1:•\ XL 1 11 ?\\ I;b o .‘ '4, _„,,,Lk\I , ,_ -_ \ . i \�.\ �`l I to*gip � v/., ,1�,�4r,,,, ; \� \� r �t�so.,llliil7)rs �\`�•e,� ° \ t • f r S' \�'1 1/)Imr.k.1,,i)))))\... .�.04)0)))1_. . I :. , 1 1. � f .. , '.',c m..d q�, Z" ice '.. '.11�kO .4' !00 \\ 1 \er*:' '' 'M iftf``‘,..'14WEir 40f7tfretigAit4414,444V-oi--.-6----..--- ))...... i,-- • ��/' •^4'1 +nun xi \ 4, 4 1 11\\, �. ) \, � �� t∎I/ .. !_--� ms ' .� r, �'czz IZAK,���:-.....4.'_,,,' �� , 'g�� %� I�� 1tiE�'' ., `1.�, x�a �m€r r., � 6 it ��/ ';iP :���i// � i 1! `III) I la 1���_-�.m�. ��_vsf_.r.-ice�__ � \�..�..,.��.�—__4� 1 < l r..r ...a +.ri.....aa.ac. riCo _ -a4r -//////%%//////%�ll���IJJIJiiIIIIIIJII�IIII� � j� ` � << ` G�� { b , �`}: -\1�� � ..1..�A A.. r...... _.,4,.. +1/ , , t .•. - .,,to ,,„. b ` e .r/ r - life ,,.` �!e 1� f t ��� f'r� �c�' •^r s4- [I, 11 CID t 4.1P. ' ',-,-i-LA li a 77 ir' , M Y - 44-00 �, 5 ti _ 1 i tC 1 j:! �i ,;S3 ,�,, i 'sy j �j l 1 �\ ��fr„'r. ,c Jam.�y. j''S', NS' (I t!H f et- .1-C4.14'4. n. i .....„4., * 4„...v°; L s. .- • iliofrf .! I .$t 1 ! Ilii I . 1 7447' • 4 ' , 4_Aits ..., . 6 1 t 1 .1 r i I. ,IV .44. E I I I • — f ,„ , , , Lt., ,;, , 1 , ' isisi il ig 4 pi L 4, ................. Q 0 1 1 1 , , 4 . co) k , - 1 I " 0 !ph.i' ; 1 II I ii E -7 4 - \\ • , ..-...., • 1 , 1 i - 1 • 7 1 I fini ii i r .op k._ ; ;-• --..."----::, -;'•'. ..., .u- .-7- ,f 1°' ) ; ) h _ ii 111111111111I 1 I ! II s I _ ...... ._,e . : die,„b„,sail 1. -;,, , •.' ''_:-,-E ,:i 11 0 RI 1 Ilti g _ ..:-":1:—.......7:". .4.•41 ..N.„ ■ •. .1 i C' s- EQ i , ''=-...-,:_.-- E.-=2-_-1/P 11.6., ni‘ -• • • i I 1 fig i t . { ,1 . \.•isolk% fp, $V1.1 Alta I :,____c_N•kti,lila •fr . . :4'1'f.!_1;,E'lli i ,' .: 1 dildhiPligi I 0 II Illi 1 1 "?.. 11 I I 1 z z- 1 ..1: -i .01.-.4ti- 1 .q. u, i Motitillidi Ieepeppee d.u.4 41 --- ___417. i' . I 'I ZEal 04 at I 0 g;.... to 1 . 1 . I ki I I: 1.19 1 NMI 'I [ I I z et! - !. 1r1 a:r 1 1 gib* :1 I ! .- 2 Ngrot i Zutg I : 0 4 1 ] i 1 1 i II 1 t Z C i 1 S s 1 I L 11 r . ''' i 't I 11 i I i g' i 1 1 • .'.,4‘ ,/-'c i A I . ' fti — I i I Fi i 1 rl Ii.l? HU II e li I. i II e. ' fil 1 , 1 • 1 1 . i o 14-15 pt,t+pqf P.M, .../4-.IMF-aTr•Ole.woo Antippm■ourn'NW t f•d Of MI OleaCht r;i.q„„ en f '7 1/GI a \ , 0 • _. ._■ Rai 1 •6 ; o i 1 ch) ) 1 1 I • 1 I I 7A I1 ,____,— • I t ( War i,t+ 0.....i.... ri) 1- f ;,i ! ! ,. 41 \ i _ r, , iiii /i t CI) 1 1 : ■ -I 6 1-1 : ... _ i------,_ i 1 ..... v. -1-- t :• ..h..., c.r.!" - II, I I 1' . -‘,I4 , • ": t c t: .- I —i, F.' 1 I 2 . ' .. - re, r ni , I —i . . ..... , 00• a I, . • Oil, i 1, .' , ol, .E Li _i , -,. _ _ 1 ! t' - - iii igrelil ' 4-..,■ A•4 a• " . ktfi IL hit C.) I ' - il hil 1 In ROI saii Es1 • •- E I- ZU: t 1 1 I I .i - • i Z r 41) 1111.-11 rt_ 04) u- i 'It I I- I • I' - -' ..,• - -,.. I g I 1 , , _ _ ‘..____ ,+4 1 i i II 1 0- 1 t I I 1 h. 1 Ir c I — ,.--— CID I\ 1 I § , I I r I IMO. 1 Maki& i 1 I i j, 1 t I in ;.• :i i i ! I I il _ . A - 11 ti ‘ A i 111 i ht . ,„ , 1, 1 _ 1 II • ; ! . ' '- IN, . 1, 1,•_..— " ig r ', 1.A' i • r I ,' 111' i , i Tub I I I ,„..k, if.' 1 t 1' i I ' I I „I I iiiiiiiithits , i i i I I 1 1 I •I ® . , I II I I .,,#.4imm• ', i , ,- 4 1 1 MINN , .. ,,.... ... ; kti •1 t , I • :1'! .r tt. 1,.. ..• 4 r:„ i„. L..: 1,, ;_, c f■.- ; .._ 1 . '.., ...;• 1 1 a 1 i .'-- i''- - ‘1, i 1.,;i- • 4,t ,-. li . , i''-?1 lif,i51. r ..,•-_ -INA -.; . . :,,..• : ?-• ,... . ,,,.,., k l'i 6 I I i 11 i r_. 1 ii Eg k. fli s. 0 .. ?TfA t 41 ;.. ii, 11 -4 r i---r-1 i o 11 i . i e t-4 1-3-- 4:-.0 .1 P! it ILI li P• - , ., ! 1 II ',.. I± ij li( ht r 11111 :,1 t 1 i=i, ; 1 I 1 . ' •-.1 1 ,1 11 ' tp I+ ■ ,--3 lig*71,f , f _ ,, ,,, \t I di 0 , / 11) I. T,. Iti I f ,...i 1 / i I i! I 1 I 1 Fr . ,, , = g . . I t ■ :i - ,, T I PPI=L 1 1 . i., `*--L >, 4i: 1 ' J i -. 1 ! 1 _ I, 1 1 t 1 ! i / i I 11/14:1 li 114 I ,.I p 1 ' ""..'•. -Z....-Icing..- E' 7.. '"-•■•••"''' ''' ." $ 6 4,1 '''- .' I ' ,.. ...„. :J.! . o r. 11--160 t-upprAf 7.0.:,..11 0211..K XereplopuunoKpflylppr,i‘aeno Isom 1 IId 6r.JSZOlatAkil 4'•I E . — t ; 0 N lrr f/ j: _.. . S II lel0p$I1'! ,1 cri /amiottati a 1 a CO tj _f i i ;;1 I1 1 • 1 . ; 1 II 1 ' w �l! i I ;; 1 i� L 1 1 1 1 1 111 - 1 1 II I r-:,,,,,,, I I ' !I I I ..' x_ v 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 11 I I I I I ►' I I I D !i 1 - -i . . I 1 I I I II I �I III I1 I I I I 0 !1 1 .i qY I; �� 1 I 1 I , I, i i II 1 t it .l.a ! '. I I I 'Jr �— 1� I I I l Ii •I , � I zZA 1 I Ij I p i1, ,g . 1 a 11 i, _ ..I r I I I, �I I I �I I :. ,, - I j j---11/-- . )I I 11 I �i f/ I ,i u.� i li I ..: + ze II �i , I _ i i I l f, - If'L I 1 1 1 .'.11I .d MGj lI m I 11 I i I,. t 1439; 1 I I I I J,� - I i e - I ' 1 — iti_--. - zll_ I s 1 �— ; j i ...o e # + - I:. 1 , r wilt + I is II- ' , ,� + 1 1 + I x -' 1 1 f e 0 / i + _I r 1 I I/ -I- .� -Ilts- -o 1 1 I i f .9 1 1 1 I_� ! �� - I i j 1 ; i ,iI I I ' + a. I I 1 1 I I _I , I -I I i I 1�---1 = 1 1 ��I : i + fir, } ' I` E i I 1 : 4J ;I1 � I -. CJ'II I • 1 I ` 1 a - (11 1 I- 'I Iff ion 1 . 1 I. I :11 ""1 -IT _ 1- :I I I I'_ I4 I _I.. , ?, is II i t �� i III I I 9_ �1I I I I I [ #" : r• { j; I I,_ ►I ��.� I i I %I .'171"'"" { I .�� II , I II II ; 1 1l 1 _1: I . I1 1 I 1 -I 1 �'..r 'w I 1 I i Iras�orl I I I'ff�/4s :Mil�■1M ;I ) 4 r I I i I I I ■�w ?!a� 1 , y�IFi � I 1 =' 1 1 I. ' aiiilfa. f ' I 11--A 11y1 ; ( ■If! I. + �:t1IRi1 1 ! i:;G.._,� d : -a 1 1 .1 fillit - -I - I -It 1 : „' 11 1 i t - --If r -I - I H 1 II I I ■ I i l0 1 1 A IA 11-19 I VI I1'- I ' 4•.nr-wevi.....a4Iiir+lM.11...11mI1 MI Orlin IXraird7 1:1.., ‘.....1 1 I I . 4 • fhb t h summit!*I I a W I 1; /4 ; ; ''. . ; ' T * • I T _f _;_ _ , I g II I 'I II II I t ;: I II II ! - wI II 1 I 1' I I I „ I L1J___ill 4_ I ; I I 1,� -I, 1 1 I t =, - I I I �' 1' 9- I IE I I ' -I -' I I I I I_ f_ 1 1 . 1- I 1 1 I - 1 1 1 I : -,- I I I 1- I I I - —11 I �� I I . 11 r - II I II EiT IIIjT f ` I �, iI III I =� F S„ --Ii _ I 1 I I �' ■ I I I I I I I I III i I I II - I �E.,r 1 1 I 1 11 t I 1 I I 1} . I 11 1 I 1 g + ; $ I1,.I I II I - ;I zZ r • I . • I I I , , I I z-°°�i , ; 1W� I—_ 1 g-.1 i � I I I t 1. j I I i...� " pii 1 r filgdi 4B 1M - 4B I ■ CB I L: �5gs 3 All II Il 1 ' "-�I 1 w� 1 I z.e H , ;; }' 11 j =i• I I 1 . 1 -.:1__ i t I I i I I I I ITM"_: s 1 I I 1 1 ■ 1 1 1 I r i I I i 1 Iii I N I I I __ t- 1 c f • ' , 1 , I ; I- 1 4B I 0 4? 1I 1 I _ i Ij 1 I 1 = I ; I "1" I I , q I ICI 1 ; I 1. j I11� 1 Er ! 1 1I 1 : I1 I e 1 I 1 J _ . I I 1 - 1 11 , II ‘ 1 I; ' I 1 II IT { 1 ! I e 1 1 ..1 I 11 1 1 I: dg I I -- 1 1 4B I I I I -I < j 1. I I i ?,o �. 1 11 II — I ' I I F 11 1 1. I . Ir f NMI 1 t f II 1 1 E ■ +y-- 1 I I 11 I., • ,, i i 1, I\ I I '} 11 I III II I III — — - 't 1 . I I I .f .. 1 , 11 -'. 1. , 11 I –- - $•1 1 ` 1 1 I I I I I I -,. I I fl '"r'7 I I 1 a , - 1 „ 1 - 1 I I I f 1 4 1 1 III , I 4 I i 11 1 . i III II I 1 I 1 11 1 I , 11 1 _ 1 1 I 11 I - I I I 111 ".,'' I I i II I I I II 'I 1 , I 11' -R If, I I I II 1 � I I I ,I 1 , - ff ----L--LL–_JL f...- –_L--LL--J1_ .._.. ZPl – I I L 11 1, 1 E • Isy xy I. - 0; E © ® °© [ 1 !S pa,pnr'P.m,-.v.1. MIR;fie.0144,.+mot714r1r:1.1 *171usop11 Iran I1ti atztri[I I�Yr% t d 1 �1,I��1iPit�����bFb?`1►fJ`�(.�i� r r'7!,%I 'ar tc ti r' ���� 9,l z z a `• is. V, .N.,,,,1_,-,==,.-(4 f±-s-•=-'---.-1—;_4, ev,... 1,- (AN if' :// 4),V,01).) -4 (-1-0-'• -1", 'if/ _t. 6M1: I '''''\T-,---.44. -sf-='?-1'1--:_7-- __ av ,,,,,f; j „ei; 1i/hi. (61--:-:::- ,-,- -..•.>,.,'',,,..i ,-,,,-/ // / ,4. o II;:-.. . ,,.. :z c-', -.. , ":, .,,,-----7-----,'-f-';,'V,- --y- -ii hit t / j •.;,. . fr/S' :/ l i�D� "+� /Jid(- < FJ °-;yp 'i"=,'� (,EQ _ - • ‘ ii}t iqe vr. -_ -� �•``�\ •�;..� ` /• :� 'f< ✓re, isir;r __=Z•"_7,.„ t.yrt - .*�4�..d a I� i p L•• t�„(%(�/' ` 1J:.;iv�r "' 'I'II:lr )I�j� i, i �l(f fr''' �' ••,,;F _ i '�.•)T / wtv ee , r f Ire0. girls �I,,'i1k1`,Ilse•. E' �`1 , • It i it i ' -' ::51) ,- iiiiiIi e ; i:' s i�d�q(�$ Iii JL at 7°k 1�1 1i y I � ;1 1 1 t ! llii hit Mt 1 it.!. . ��I 1•'''A,'1'''N.,.,\, .... ...,:......., „...„.,,, \ lt, i + + —4 ± ± —i- t + + it- ' ' '• '''. ' \\:\ *\\ \... '.A.." . .- • -111',1C,.9":44-:-.-. NI":-.-,,,.::::...... .,...-, ....''''''... ...., ‘---...... ,4.4,..:�. �� +•'1'111 1 ' � ; }�,.-. f s.j: : :F �C }� k �„ .�U �� ,.14011'•, �,I ay'ti�3'4?? ? !h"i. i `*[ r. a\` �a' Iti 41' l 6':0'.-:F! �'�"'f-s i� ' t i A .,i, • .a^ t s ,` q4'" .. (( 1 e •ll�� / . � IRI�", •;•"."i�;rF': ,t 4,sd J, r ,iTf ��e �' { _ III I i I �1 it \ 1i^ ` ! %/s ��lo/IPI.,V -I,- -"nc,..,�,11� ! ,t-:,,,..,,,,,,, - • 'J�J 11/1�(/11111111/1(1I II11�11I I 1( '�x k¢�' �e ( f 1 )4 ) l�l,f1f�ll/l/J01 l 1.'\11111 111 '�\II i I II f� �\ Si OF A� I 1')6 F }ap L ! t s '.- - I t , �� f �Itl3.�. I w.. �1 a>Od9' )...�.YL , 4 40.1,41!:, %%%//r//ill')l�J�11/1111111l��l�11 - % ,0 6p.i. fi li::� ;% � -. f-. ��_f 4 ' Yis r � r ! g& !4 x . �{ r n yr1 r t, u 1, j ffle 42,-*,,_ i . ,� a � t 4t4a "� t � t h I t t l a . :.` i1 I i a S ;.j, i "� � g : . �i ,r } fi 3 a-. K�t'E •�u�� V � ' s c t F o . ; :r s IL ' r s , . fi ii' rtu rI a4 P:''f � c d e x•. 1 : F y a n i€Ty 4. Y l0 Ry . i. N_ n. , p ao , Is a -- :4 1 lift, z i Il ' 'I �g h li e -- 0,• i4 ; I .'! ,I,01,:....44 r., a ,,? . 'r i P$411.1�• l i i t i il 't 4 d i fPl �yaj' ' i} � ( I i 111' tl 1 s 11,1,-.1 l li y ' t� IIi{ li'li ; li p.q., ;, d1 4,.:?..:: nt i i h t I , 1 ie_ -_.� / ; � „ ! a t j. , t✓ u S i. ' i 4' : i S f- I S iII t`"i V hl r � 1 ; " ' E [ I,a s • K .4' i ` 6 'qqrr ,a..S y , : ..m: .cn .,_ is il :Ti • r ll tulltifln+lvr►11 fd iFlC aaUf/a i I Ct w2+nnr•ru.,•••••1•••••9 ,-- ir lak' c.)" ! Liwtki ,t iI I I I --I— 0 , I z L >r E t Q I 1 O -ice 6''''\'"\\\,..„:z,,,.N ± :.,..„„,,,,,,,, , ± \\\,,, _i_ ± ± + _i_ . 0,5, k ,' Zn ' '.P: 7 M a .,,,,,,,, ± + • , ' '.7..i ..fir �.�' :�� u;?;• ` :'`" p� :!1!;p cc.. ! if w \�._.,• 0,� n 11` ` '1 , j ` a �v i '',�4 €"� M. z� v °gyp r- f 1lIl�j,rj� '1"P"r , . o -I f7"ss��L }, fra' s�O/ �`• , ' = 2 i/l tf C'�1 °s':ea�w w 'Gt e ,. j O Q� �� 4 tl lc �/ ''e! '' ' `� ,� �° ,'- ''1',,,z.7.�/ S/I/� 1,o�c��/�/' 5 {�y�i r g �y�b.- i • J T fr is = (1i/ /^/ e s ��/ ^'� $ , �` i� to ;�;. 1 e.f / S .3 K- /�p�.. e �_: s.+1 -,..• ,•:,; /Y�r�i f/,, L ~ ,„ ?2fii� P rJ +r� xl {h . ,:c l[ , ., _../ 'x '•'• 3 'a�°.3 :4� a T. s �`' '$�' w, �' `S i�� i � b ae f l'S Vjj_ D a l t s:{csau3 � kx jl- �t �� ;:v4,::::' f £? -� —— — {i•. 1 .✓ a• I,-//� @ "11e,'-kgTT2ØJJ _T' Y >hu " agslNBlRi►d 4 pia i 9i,I11 ;-,--g_w.....:. . _w 6 . Obv tr_w v�.�' dF� _ - t filillifit(I��1�����i (Jlo��f�f �� �� a `, a wxir��m6 w:_v,iaiw� ile�r ssas� i�' 8° �ta,s J" +l � �� %3/ f V�/ if +t e 1 , �� y�f v ►*,e` j�if/� i. ;�I 4J 4th b'+ �..�1r�dU ��ze� 1 §� ., G# "i. ,.11 Q 'ti • , �w11 Y �� .L ,:. ,. ::... , -fir..„. . r• 1 J ` S AM.F v' 4 � ,..:1 ,'' �. 't. '.y,f ..- I i f o 74.,,z. ' -r�•,4 r .his x p 1, , t, ,i„ i :, 1 T t R • •S riLI,IF �tl !• f 4 .J ti y Y '; `1 5 1! 1111 } 4 F �1 ..?� �{,, r>?'_''.......1,. x jJ 1 t .w....,—_,....:, 't11+I.1A� 1} DI!'11�11>rT41 IcJ•cIcZ t Hillside Design Review DRC2008-01012 • i t ••�+ ¢+te�e•-: • 4't. id4 • } •- tf�• '' 4 •.1.. - 4. • •' l Y 1 '-.'71i. J '~. , ' ,- _ ••f •^,:,•L' f r• _ ►� •a.r 6 - ter. f +`r 4,+._ ,, i • ... .._ . _ , . . ., , .,c.-:. .. _ ?. - . ..: .....„,- . ; . . . . . _ ,.... . , . . : . . II • Project /; b J SRe r • • ‘ _ t ; i,• ,; f-per lit* ' Iliiii*S 4 <. ifs jig ALMOND l ko' r.� + r , .- ' •-•tom_. - .- ir , 1 •.... _-.411i.1-niu 4. wr; V r ��: :. t I HIDDEN FARM A le 0 .:41, 1 0 /ix. EXHIBIT B '� • a' • ACTION AGENDA DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING • TUESDAY MARCH 1, 2011 7:00 P.M. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA Committee Members: Lou Munoz Ray Wimberly James Troyer Donald Granger Alternates: Frances Howdyshell Richard Fletcher Francisco Oaxaca CONSENT CALENDAR NO ITEMS SUBMITTED. PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS This is the time and place for the Committee to discuss and provide direction to an applicant regarding their development application. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. 7:00 p.m. (Tabe/Willie) HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2008-01012 - ANDRESEN ARCHITECTURE, INC - Development Review Application to consider architectural and site plans for an 11,906 square foot single-family residence, an attached 1,668 square foot • RV garage, a 1,359 square foot detached garage, a 2,101 square foot detached equestrian/storage/workshop building and multiple deck/patio areas totaling 5,339 square feet on a 12.42-acre lot located at the northwest corner of Amethyst Avenue and Almond Street on a site that is encompassed by the Very Low (VL) Residential District (.1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), Flood Control (FC) District and Open Space (OS) District - APN: 1061-501-03. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. 7:20 p.m. (Steve) UNIFORM SIGN PRGRAM (AMENDMENT) DRC2010-01010 - VIRGINA DARE BUSINESS CENTER - NATIONAL SIGNS - A request to amend Uniform Sign Program No. 39 to allow Logos, double stacked lines of copy on the first floor of the building and to designate new areas to place building identification signs on the building located at 10470 Foothill Boulevard within the Virginia Dare Business Center. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:03 p.m. • EXHIBIT C • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • • 7:00 p.m. Tabe van der Zwaag March 1, 2011 HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2008-01012 - ANDRESEN ARCHITECTURE, INC - Development Review Application to consider architectural and site plans for an 11,906 square foot single-family residence, an attached 1,668 square foot RV garage, a 1,359 square foot detached garage, a 2,101 square foot detached equestrian/storage/workshop building and multiple deck/patio areas totaling 5,339 square feet on a 12.42-acre lot located at the northwest corner of Amethyst Avenue and Almond Street on a site that is encompassed by the Very Low (VL) Residential District (.1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), Flood Control (FC) District and Open Space (OS) District- APN: 1061-501-03. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Project Review Guidelines: The proposed single-family residence is located in the Very Low (VL) Residential District and within the Hillside Overlay District. The intent of the Hillside Development Regulations is to minimize grading and ensure that the form, mass, profile, and architectural features of the house are designed to blend with the natural terrain, preserve the character and profile of the slope, and give consideration to the size and configuration of the lot. Because of the grades on the site, the applicant proposes as much as 12 feet of cut/fill. The Development Code requires that cut/fill over 5 feet requires Planning Commission approval. Recommendations by the Committee will be forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action. Site Characteristics: The project site is located on the north side of Almond Street at the top of • Amethyst Avenue on a 12.42-acre site. The site is made up of multiple zoning districts, with the developable portion of the site (Very Low Residential) encompassing 3.2 acres. The applicant has received permission from the San Bernardino Flood Control District to encroach on their easement to construct a driveway and patio/recreation areas. The applicant has also received a letter from the Army Corps of Engineers stating that the project is not under their jurisdiction; therefore, no additional permits are required from them. The residence to the west shares an access driveway off of Almond Street, which is entirely on the applicant's property. The lot drains roughly from north to south, with an approximater elevation change of 200 feet from the north to the south property lines. The lot is bordered by existing single-family residences to the west and to the southwest on Gooseneck Drive; undeveloped land outside the boundary of the City to the north; and San Bernardino Flood Control District land to the east. Project Design Overview: The applicant proposes constructing an 11,906 square foot single-family residence, an attached 1,668 square foot RV garage, a 1,359 square foot detached garage, a 2,101 square foot detached equestrian/storage/workshop building, and multiple deck/patio areas totaling 5,339 square feet. The house was designed to work with the grades on the site with the 1st floor/RV garage tucked under the main living area. The design is within the required building envelope and all retaining walls conform to the related height limitations. The applicant was unable to minimize the on-site grading to meet the 5-foot cut/fill limitation necessary for Planning Director approval. • Because of the size of the proposed improvements, a large amount of grading is required. The applicant has worked to balance the cut/fill with the project requiring 238 cubic yards of fill. Multiple retaining walls were required because of the 12 feet of cut necessary to construct the driveway and garage. There are a series of 5 short (3-foot maximum) retaining walls north of the house. The applicant is using gravity • retaining walls that will be landscaped and irrigated with the areas between the retaining walls planted with scrubs and groundcover to soften their appearance. The house will screen these retaining walls /4a3 DRC ACTION AGENDA • HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2008-01012 —ANDRESEN ARCHITECTURE, INC. March 1, 2011 • Page 2 from public view. The proposed house conforms to the design guidelines outlined in the Development Code, including carrying materials and architectural features to all elevations. The lot coverage will be approximately 10.5 percent, which is below the maximum 25 percent permitted in the Very Low (VL) Residential District. The applicant will widen Almond Street and install the required Community Trail improvements. Staff Comments: The goals of the Hillside Development District is to minimize the adverse impacts of grading and to maintain an environmental equilibrium consistent with the existing vegetation, wildlife, soils, geology, slopes and drainage patterns and to preserve the natural topography and scenic character of the site. The goals of the Equestrian Overlay District are to promote a rural/farm character in an urban setting in order to create an infrastructure for the keeping of horses. The size of the proposed house, garages, outbuildings, and patio areas create a major impact on the existing undeveloped site. While the applicant has worked to adhere to the restrictions outlined in the Hillside Development Regulations (Chapter 17.24), the proposed 20,272 square feet of improvements make it difficult not to create a major impact on the rural character of the site. The question is whether the large size of the site (12.42 acres) helps to diminish the negative impacts the project has on the environment. It should be noted that a large portion of the site is undevelopable because of the zoning and flood control easement restrictions. Major Issues: The size of the proposed improvements are an issue (see staff comments above). • Minor Issues: None. •Staff Recommendation: The applicant has worked hard to balance the requirements of the Hillside Development District and the homeowner's desire to live in a very large home. On-site grading has been reduced to the greatest extent possible, with the house tiered to the existing slope and retaining walls integrated into the foundation of the house. Additionally, the large lot size helps to mitigate the large footprint of the project, with roughly 9 acres of the 12.42-acre site left undisturbed. Staff recommends that the Committee support the proposed design with consideration given to whether the project fully conforms to the intent of the Hillside Development District. Design Review Committee Action: The project was approved as presented. • Members Present: Munoz, Wimberly, Granger Staff Planner Tabe van der Zwaag • /4��f Hillside Design Review DRC2008-01012 I., • .,77„ ti': • ( ,,...,;:i- . i.• •,, II* • '" -- 44PIT 114'••. . • - 1- '-i* •ilh -'' . st . 4,,,, k.„ . • ' , ' t -^,F. A . • • . . ' : - 'S.'' • 4, : ' •A't„-' - - •, .?' ' : II . ti, . . ,,,...._ ,,, ... •i i - • .. • 0 1 , . I...o.• ' .- .4,' - ",. ..c`..7 7 1. _ .• *:4111:0:::"... .. . - t ..., ■ •- _ . . . . .' - ...i. r■ ...... ., . . ,..... .... .„. _ .... , *V ., J ' • ki -• .ir .... ... , ....q. --, itd .., . . ...,. ..,4 ,.... . , 41 •4 iv, 411 : ir lam 4, • so=4 Aik \\\ -...- f.- . •• 1 ' •** / • ', , ?', Project Site CI' Ili. . ....;%' • i -414 • - ;-•2. 'In jri -a .- ■•■,...„.„ J . ar , --4 Silk s • 41 i 1 Hp, i VI - Idi •■■*14. * . , • 1,..'Ir Z1. .. • ..4 i - , • 1-' • • r - -.... ' 4, j,„ . A ..• . -i 1/ 8' 'r I, • ' f `°f .,' .4, ....:.„...... ..,7,7)7110,; - v.- J ,, .... ., ite'... • • 1111 • ----. 4 1 44.., irtALIst OND' y I k •Z, ...,,. , - ' ' e• • • :. . „et _ ....,...... i ' • r'',A '• • •' . ' .... , • ... - ) r, , L 1, • 4 •11 - - 011111"r" t- - f '.-"'•' r : x114,, . . e ,,,,, ,.. ,i 114,-• , .. _ ,_ , , I ... . ' - • J. c,f z" N •4V.4.1i7 8 •' H g DEN FAR IA •- i .,. . •c-,ist . .. . 1 4.44,- - . . . ... 16...... A Ar 'tr .Alg•.' ••• . r ,11,_,-* • /011 • ) • • '4 , . ..• i 74, 4. ' 4, 1 •II • r• ,s .: l' .t.4 • 'ft ' ''' pi / . 1 e., ,, - .., ■se• i ' ' -€ 1 .:- ' :., , , i r• ; ' ., . .1,,,, . ,r• , rr— , Y • / 2! ii.. , .. ; 1 . r * . • 4- 4 + 444111.4 14 4.. . ' 3Z-1" •. , -I, : , ,s , ,• : Llk //"- . 1 . - i' ' "` ' • '' *' . • . .• ..,, .,.- . . • . • ■ 2.1 •' ' A , • •• . . . . lkag:t . . . • . r -..--..... ..... . ..Ait# ' ref .‘ • • 1,. li. •i - • ., . • dr•a it 4. ' , • ...66 f. a)'4 .../ • , ' 1 ill • " 4 a • . I Ar 0. ,• IP, • r :-4.1 ..." 41., . V • ,, rot ,., . h... .1..' ., • i ■ Ili . ". , ' ' r ,,.. ■191 . ,. ■ ill , I. , , • . of....N • 1 it. • . . . . . • '4_I s..-? t , .... . ..a-T—' s, ... i . ri... •- . .. -,.. A- . - •,:t• ... ..• d ...„ fr....A. .. .:.• A - . 4,/ • • • • A• 7 v - , • ,4 , . ..... •A.!Ilita .s.. It . . ••• - 'I ' IV - ■ ',. , . ... . • . . • r . • . . • i.: . r i • I ■,F rip _ I . .v 4 0 ,. ...„ • i a_ • ... .... . , . /1--3- ..... •V - • . . ,4 _ . .. .. . . r„. ..;-.. -.. : 7 •• ''. It. ,... 1 " 'r. . .. • ..., ' e .1014, • z, r'-, _..- ... If -4 ....rt. .....' •7 * ., - t. • f t, . , .... . , t.,:. ., ., 0 A ... . -:, ,. . .. .. t•A- • - • .• 1 • ' sq. ..'' r.. ' A• - •• - 4-.0 ..7 _j - , i . ,_....... l 1 2 . i• — ,'' ..4 ..:0- , • , ',..- -, 4 t•4.1' ....f." • 4 P 4 . • '''' •• ., • it • • • • 4 ',; - ' 4 . ' -1. - - ,• .-... , 1 .-7-0-. - ,- 1, • .:-/,) . , , I .., . • , . IC ''O'' . f . •I - '••'.: -_::f. ---; . ,.- ., ,.... I . ,r.• -It.' N. f , , i - •- .1* .1 . - Mit . 4,'lk '',,, 1 ^ ; . lil■ . .,, ,. /;„4,. a•' 4.. . :t., • A' .' - ' - - . . . .,. - . .• %..,, i • .: ., • . - '*f .•'.7 '', 1 .' --•,.. 144111-7:11- * ` ■ it 1;‘- • .- • oof - - - . N .-* Jr ,. •il ir .,. .. tki477. : . _ , 4.. ,•,. . _ . _ .„. 1• . ; • -. .41 • . 4 '. ...., . ••......r. it-4-4t,- • ' 't• t..: . _ •••.-,., • . • .. - . -_ L., • . 11 ? ' -.• 'Ass •;*". r. - r• ,.; la.• • .4. c 0 • t .t ....' ■I' ' 4•- _ vs .,'-'31... •:•,.. ,• • .....•,, re% ,. , . ...... , . , ,,...- ... ,.„ • , .7..i ,- . -• .1 ; • , -..0 .. -44 1 , .,... .7" " f . •• t tA• . ./.4-' - .4... . * ) ■ . ... tit. ' ..,. .7- ., ,,,.., ,,,- ',''''-'4'.s. •4. .r ' ). ..!..... - . % 01; *- ..4'_t. • - . . .. . . .,- . . 1.--- - ...■ - ' /-- • 1.. • Or, w , jilt°. 117 ite.4.-.e.'1- VI '4;1. .' :-....,a 1,' -; s•... .N.,.. , •0.: 4 41. • 4. . -- •'' .• f• ••t • . . . . . . • oft , ..,._.,.. . . I • * . .._. ' . . (N . ... •,' i 'Tit ' , t % 4 It . • . .0 . . - •. - ,•4, i -• -": I ' s .•1r,-. ' ' . . . • 3'. ,....4. . r rig 1 . - ', • AV. r , " .. "' la- 8 . . .... t a '", .-• it . , . - . . ,..‘14ist• I . . A Cl. III! . . . . . .... . _ ... s, •• . . 44.. t ' • . . .1.06., I • . -4111re -r . , . ... -. * ,. -, 0 A.,. • ,'. ' C. t, • I '-. 14tr - . ...,,, - • • -... . '.".-. . * ' •_.' 1- „u • • . .1. 4 • f s _ ,.,. -. 1 , 2 ' . I•-4> 1.- i , • 010 • ..6, r 41' C •• . .. ., --0 •t .el, • .1 . . . , . .,_. .. A. , . ...i„... . 4 .. I' 41 - ---0, 0 4, 0 - ', " -.11". • - '• ' ,.--. ''..1:-3 . ' .,- .-. '- - ... : ''',. 4 I 1 i '4, . 1 ■ •11 'I. ^ .1 ",*•!-•.• ".". q '. - - -act? . . , . . - I .*:•-,' • • • i . .... •., .4,, .... I, . . - .• •' •1* ' , . . • • L.' - •C %opt ..„. .„4,... -- , lc v .1- . 0 -r . •74.ry r I.• 4 I i i' . t ttfr 4' re- A ( . ... V.- • "...41 • "..•' • . • , •.• . 4 ' • •-tim-r• i -- ' t •- '• • t 4 4 ,.•, _ _4_; ., ... - .•- . 1' 'tr • a • . I. •‘ . . 6,.. I CA.• ,.•• • 1,. , 1 .,. ''' , : ' ' A. •-.4.C.0 - A $.. . ..- .1' • 1 , i.,, Ar ■ 6 • 4 . . 4 ." -., ;• ..„ f‘,...- -. • , . .,.. II "... .; -/ . -4■1r.:LI; '' . ...„: ... ' at,- -, ' • . ..... • 4 f ,,,, A I .* . 4', :.11 ( lit 4. f* cl... i ilk 41P . ... rA t a I liVi 4 0 ■ P---3q , -er.,. 0 •. .1- . , ... . ... . - - . ..- - - . . kr . • - ' i.1.. • .," .. . ' .,',"' ..' .. 0 • ., ■ :. 1,;., ale 14— , • , ., r , .. .• — `. .. ' .. Fc„ ,,. ts.. P. .. -Ve - . • ' . r , • • • . - . t .4 ,.• --it- ■Or: • ,. . f ... , ''' • •r- .$1711r•- ,, t ..." • -, - •, ..-i. - P e•... : t ,. 2 nr•:, i . ...., ..2.." . 1 I.,. . . • I ' . •••-• I . . , . ••''' • 14 .• -f,„ • :64*,• . . ... 0 t .0. . , . ... . .: ...,. ,..,.:ii 3 :.. .......41±. . .t.„ „ „ • . . 0.. . ... '• • . . •.••••; r .. 4 10......"4:. 2. . • 1 1.1:4t .- .... .,: . -..... . , . ,,.. _- ..--• • •,,. . ... : 1..,t„-,.. :-.. ..-• .- k • ,.... , ... .. , .••,.. . . V - -. -': --..... • - ' .... ... . V- - " ' - • '-'... '. , - ,. e ' 4 . .. Il• ,. -- Y-'.-.:‘, --'$'7*P: • . ot. ir ... • le .. — - • . -• .... ,.., ... • ,i....;:. , . '''.Y., . . x •, • i4z . , . • 1 . . .. r I t t 1 0 , 111." • 4. I Si. . 11 • 4 11( • ' ' I k . 0 • • -•4.. 1 .. . . I 1 • ik Ifi V. VI' • . 4 r -,;„.... ..•,;1. .116. .. •. -,, • —-- 4, ,„.., 4,0 ri • . ' . 11----3S' • • • • , V'Ai,"I: - 7,•••• • ' . , •.. •• • -.• c . - •. •••• . . _ . . i• .. 4 4 r‘"•• • 114 LLA - gi 4" • r#4 .- _ . • 0 . 0 CL _ - 4--3q It•••• ' I. lf,;."-..,,, ' • ,t,',.;._;..•'/.•••• , . •• ‘',..,. ."NA,. •'..• • ,. •■••• ' •, • t )"''-11.p."-• .1i, ' .'•'.4 a•-‘ •••. i 4 . 9' ,■,8. . ' "'",.:Fi ... ,.... - -+' eflial a . I 4 Ar., •' a .1.," .7,-• I 1 , • • A.4? i 1'' 1 '' .' ' "Il.41:•*':.',,. ,_ , 4!,..., . ,,.. 4 : Iii I ... ...' , ; •• --,-!-,,,,,,.:iri..,-...A4'. , ,. , , I • I, ito•. ,,• ••,.--- ol..—• 4--•:„.••••• • I .4 , .1 4 , .` 0 4. 6 . 'I •4: i • '.c.•-- er . . ,.. . . , • 11, ilk. ... •-- • ir"'"' •7 * . . -....., 4.' '—' lib'144. 44, 11K: . .. sit • - ..--4...tie. 1.,,r- - . it. •,, .. •, .c - . Ct. ' .., ,1 ;E.j. :.:. • - ..: • • 1 T , . se, i • -1 , f , • : i 0 , I g , .....1-..,,i- r.,Ni4 .;t..•...... V.,..A ,. ...,:,,r,-,,.... .. , ;-7.."44,,,,t,',4r4;441,4,. a'.• ! ) 3.1c-lit''; ..:•"‘-'''''. 4 r....1..:' -' •-•'• , ,. `,11 • ' '••-'444•.•'t . '.I. .. ..•- . 4,-••-:$4.4.;:........-: • ' ••• .. '-VS-;'''.74;.T•,, . , 4•6- .'••••"1"4,,„4,C,••;4;‘4::', • CO• . - , .., IV,.7*-4" -.0:4 • . • * 4 e , i 0 'f .1-... • 1".'"'I i . a , • .• 0 •• 1• 0 al• I t , /4.446 • • Y. �. . 1'2' f ., .. .. .'t ... .•.•••.... .. • . .., Vs: • •.A:1.V:: 1g .* fit i • 0 'r i =1 , �► r 1 I S`• r ly• _ rv` ' : l. ` S • • r �I ' ` • 0 r 0 • t . 1 r - . = 1111 . „,, • ' ' - L. • 4 . • ' 4 . ••A '';'4, •-14. 4'. ',` ''-4 . ... ' . Pr .. .•'' --.' . A • .. . •,••4.• .. •A• ' . •-. •. .4' 0 t . „. 1- ... . s ■ -*4 . ..„,, . , . ,-. .,,;110t.-- • .t. .., .. -. • - . , gi ..- • , , ._ •• _ , , „. . . . ..-..f 1 • • : . ; . . .• .. .i, , - , - , :” ,,,, 7 0 ",, .,• ; .11.110..-- ' It. ,1!.L..'•,:"..1 Ir.:- •,,,,,,,ov•,,,t, . qi .. lf., :' •' . •'•-•,,.... . ....••— ,..fit„.::7:,if., . • 4., .'„.. 4...... ; .. ' .. ,. ' :.' • irk 1.1. ..„4. .f,". *• •?'„,„: .- ?,, ,, Nt:-.K.-.. . • . ,. . ..- ...... • •.. •-- -41. • • 41. '''„,,..te.* • lit t ' .i. .. ..., • ..16. - . ''''4 .: Agt1Nr''..t-j*-•-• ' i' . . . .1'' k' . ....- j a-t ' • .-' , , ... _— 1. I r.r' , • -x.':44 ; ' _4"':;- *..• _ 111 ' ..-, -- i i / T '9, . I ! ri, 4 • t t =.!--- . ...1..., 0 • .. • 4..',,i, ,,..•_ -. . •• , .. . .1. •• • , . . • . . . ....„ .., , „ 0 • 0 . ,;... it ..,..t #111 0. 0 -s , 0 . . 0 i • I ' - 0.... /J-L0- • •'". • ... „ ' - „. .. -4 t si 4 4 1.• ... - • . 4.. ' ,.. . -•', - • *, ...,, .... ...ii -. ..".• .. " (.1_ - . ; - ••• •'::- . - ,-, • - fi- 1 .-1.4.4-4. . . , ' .,, -1.- — • - .4. '• G 4: t. 41i-. f •-, . t ilt t . ., fr., ,,,,, ,,,,,,b.,. ,,.. A Y.:,... .. . , . • _ ''''Z' .. . .*:„ 1 I' lir • ' 111131 t , ... _ 10 ... . • fit 1 . , ...' 11 _ . t le' I ' - i w6. ••••*--- 's,-- , 41;' • • ' :150147t* ,Mti 1 . 4 Of- • I' • r ■ I ,.... -16.44 •. •. ' .„.- - - . 0 -? 1 I.,,,c.--,, • :.' .it-.1. - . . .. L : li•-•;! \,_iat •.' '.-,:-..-4• .., , . . . • • ...i...., • . - - - „ . • . ,. • .. -,- - • • . .. ., _ . "Ili ik. ',- ....- iii• AI - 54;..' ' „ __ 1-14 ,,,• ,. - o • . ■4'1 I& . i ' ' I P ' e- 4 I. 0- 11--/C3 . . . . ...`""•-•'. A . i 1.,; . .. i. i s. t • .•',...,..**... . 'N. Al 'V. - '7114 '41V 'S' '141 •. 1 'fft. • k4• A ' . .... '.•., ..t 4• .6 14' 6 i '*• 4'• .. . .• ;4 .4.- . '4 • i ' .. •.4.. ' ‘146,... • . i llarillC:Ar :■'.6 r - . • , •--.. '.. lk, • - P,- -,, •,.. .. " ...---1. 1 ,,,.. -, .. *Ft_ • -. „, . „.-3,, . „ ... • ' - - r•z - . -..., ..-1 -:.:. , -,44?,-, • . , . . ; - .,,,rip... ._ • ...r,- '. ' 'fir — -s: •• ..., • 0 ipt,:.:;*,, . 4 '441,1 --•-: 4 . .,,- 0 t -,. • • 6. •- ' -: '1 . -'-• -••• ,,'. . ',. , 4 7 1.1 A,• ik : -#.•?"'■L' *' 4 r iyitii 'p',0F.h 4 4 1, t ' 9,f'.. - • '''a ' • . * ... . 'i 4i, . 4 -• . ,... .. 41.1 '; *. i. - '• .4.i .„, __ ..111* A -.„.... t ,t;.,• . • ' - , --, is. Z.' ',V;3.'',a■ ' • ... . - . . . a .. . s'*- ■ ' .. - Ark ? •44 . .. - . ....... - , . . _•- --- , Rr -T• -'4 .„„ ..4.,.:.....,.;./ 012,.....;;;■,1., ' ‘*. ....c' ....Ilia,.. .1. . ..• .._ .,,•-, -,...7 ." ts,i. • .- ." 7,4r-- ; ..,::P ' ..••s. t •' .. ..'■ ,.t .. , •1•k --,.., l C.7 . , . , ., . ••.• .- - ,•4 A'j f 4* alr •- - - ,S. ' ' :,.."..... ''!4 - 410 "-, IRO-- S .. • - - - ...4"-‘ • ','a li -ter . 4 - ' , •. . , ,.... ,., , ., - , s ,•• a 1 -* -... ca.. ...- 't, • -' ...L..,, ,.. • 1"'" --...'... ., f di • ''' — .' .‘,,...... . ., , ,.. .r . t .,. -, I 0,,, :, . . Xi . 1.. . • - , ... wili . 11.;..,„ , A •- A t . a" . 4. ... '11 1111' . ' " 16-A „ ., . '". .. , - - - - '• i' . t .. ,_ ...... • ... 141, ..,. . . ,.i'..v. i! . _ . . . . . .',/R •■• -. 7' , -* - - .3 • ' a.. ..„ ,.. - . . • . . , 4•1 .„, ILL . l . 1. ., . . • ., 4 ' , rt .... •, , . ..... . ...._ ....... . , .. , . ..... •.,... `..*. 4 lti I • ar . ;' i !4'... 4 ,•„.1 di-,.. . , — •.-"-_.„ - . .:- .` 7 A. • ' ;tit:11, r ; 4At. Irr!I .... , . . , ,. -.„4 ;, -:;., ;:. ., • - 1 . . . -4- -,• :6,.. . •''• 4' C IA 4. ' .V1 4..., I i: .., .. (4. .L. .- 4 ,..A.:*:4. • • • .- • I -Aba a ' ...• s . ■ . '.t.•. ,.„.-; ' . e ... *. . , e t . I...r0,..,'.,4 , • - 1 •ii -- .- i 0 . 1 ,. „• 1,., , , .'r.f,,4i• 0 f.,4, - II I ..r -i ' 41' I AT 111441t.: f . t. , • I .. • ifil7 4 t,41.rle. t". ' ' -1..0419"— eprj6,.....iiii.i,- . • Ill ,,,,,ot g, ,, ' 1 '12;¢ • ' -,77,7.. Ali " . 1:ti,r e-k ,. -.1,0: ., ,:e2„;#0.#0:,,-.7....;.,;-...: 4•11,...A. • • is • •/ r ' , r y ....or.• e - _fi F' r }� r _ : • T .ate- +_ • t,.rr� ..+ :4• .. . -V e ,..1 .••.. •...4.. . _. . -44 777. . • _ . 40:-• Y '• . - ++ i i .. I i,,,,.-4711 •MI . I • .,.. � _,uMl. + fit} Y t •../*rC F - 0 7, *' �Y s rte. .. r ,;r- • a\ litb- ' -' _ ", • ___ .„,--,,,,_-.,..., __::_....,,_. ,. it ...).4-, . ..., . . ..,....,.r. - >a7. ZT .... :.. -- .'.I i 11; : • 0 i s!` '��� /.R ` ate+ .a Cie ... • a r ifiir L J. r e •, • /4-US • �... r r . `: T .. �,..... " r . _.., t..._• >; t . •; fi�r - ; • ; 1.1°' ,4 f v....,' •:sie f [ " .,-. .,. 'r�,. ..',..t.-'` .. , - t•• P M.,-y,.0.d - :. q f L(r •'s } "..} 1 - /�+ 00 J A' r^� _ '7 yj,('y�# � "•tea. •-_ Z"' ! . t} • 333 ^^^ #1 � .9�/ ��. die 4 a. IrefilifiAA -." e . . ,iff. yyam�# � •� .�� �'• tai . $ ! ` i",h_T • - - .,. .17- . e . :le . • .. A**.lt , . °;r. ..= fi - :- •f- . t 19 . ;= -�.--�u,y.... fi ir rr_j r w • i , 4. • r T. Y 1 r' + 'Fyx y _ X1"4,' •r'"' S .a". • • i ,s q * • 4. •e--%. • .t.,.;• . s 4,,,tt,-3 xs; �:yy • 1 r • • s r Yi r q P • I Y�. s. 'h ♦ Y F•' 14---IiV I , A 4, ix 16, 41111f - ; *444t. • , 1 l'•-;;;AD 0 • . • , • • • • • s't- • •; • • 4 , N AAP .0. •, ..• 1 1 ' CLIK • • 1 4. • r N .k ( .- 17- .-. 0 .. ...■. % -s. 4ifly iiii.' 6 . 7 . . r. , � . .-� x ,«.fir ; • i . I 4 S _ • . ...., • . .. .,. . . . r : . ... ' ti it 1 1 ilik '.q. . .0, r • ".4%, . . I.,_ A• ■ 7 ... - i , ' t . 4 . • . ...,„ / • t . • '..,:‘,6' ‘, .... :c......_ ,. ,. - . 44. a_ . I A ii. . 4 V . I 1 1.'• : ' ; • : 1 ' 1 _ p i . I ....1k. .. . . ., • ....L. . . ...• .. , ..•., 0 • 1 T _ • ,..-'.: - 4 - 1 ... II 1411 ■ III 1 It Vi 4 , ri . .., 4:Ik 0 ,.. 1.---- ... 0„. • _...- ,.t-f:il . 0 • . . '.,. ,.'•. --4f. .,' o'' :10f> . 0 ' ' • `, City of Rancho Cucamonga • T'� , ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM Arj% INITIAL STUDY PART II C94 '!:itfrj atelettim BACKGROUND 1. Project File: DRC2008-01012 2. Description of Project: Development Review Application to consider architectural and site plans for a 11,906 square foot single-family residence, an attached 1,668 square foot RV garage, a 1,359 square foot attached garage, a 2,101 square foot detached equestrian/storage/workshop building and multiple deck/patio areas totaling 5,339 square feet on a 12.42-acre lot located at the northwest corner of Amethyst Avenue and Almond Street on a site that is encompassed by the Very Low (VL) Residential District (.1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), Flood Control (FC) District and Open Space (OS) District-APN: 1061-501-03. 3. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Andresen Architecture, Inc. 17087 Orange Way Fontana, CA 92335 • 4. General Plan Designation: Very Low Residential (VL), Flood Control (FC) and Open Space (OS). • 5. Zoning: Very Low Residential (VL), Flood Control (FC) and Open Space (OS). 6. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The project site is located on the north side of Almond Street at the northern terminus of Amethyst Avenue on a 12.42-acre site. The site is made up of multiple zoning districts, with the developable portion of the site (Very Low Residential) encompassing 3.2 acres. The residence to the west shares an access driveway off of Almond Street that is entirely on the applicant's property. The lot drains roughly from north to south, with an approximate elevation change of 200 feet from the north to the south property lines. The lot is bordered by existing single-family residences to the west and to the southwest on Gooseneck Drive; undeveloped land outside the City boundary to the north; and San Bernardino Flood Control land to the east. 7. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 8. Contact Person and Phone Number: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner . . (909)477-2750 9. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): City of Rancho Cucamonga Building Department, Rancho Cucamonga Fire District, San Bernardino Flood Control District, State Water Resources Control Board. • 4-sD . Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-01012 -ANDRESEN ARHITECTURE, INC. Page 2 GLOSSARY—The following abbreviations are used in this report: • CVWD—Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR— Environmental Impact Report FEIR— Final Environmental Impact Report FPEIR - Final Program Environmental Impact Report NPDES— National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx— Nitrogen Oxides ROG—Reactive Organic Gases PM10—Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB—Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD— South Coast Air Quality Management District SWPPP—Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G — Urban Emissions Model 7G ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than-Significant-Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (V)Aesthetics (1)Agricultural Resources (1) Air Quality (✓.) Biological Resources (✓) Cultural Resources (✓) Geology& Soils (✓) Hazards &Waste (✓) Hydrology &Water Quality ( ) Land Use & Planning Materials (✓) Noise ( ) Population & Housing ( ) Mineral Resources ( ) Recreation ( ) Transportation/Traffic • ( ) Public Services ( ) Mandatory Findings of Significance ( ) Utilities & Service Systems DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: (X) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Prepared By: �pL� Date: 2/23/ Reviewed B : — Date: 2'C/ / f • Rev. 9/13/2010 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-01012 —ANDRESEN ARHITECTURE, INC. Page 3 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Mb Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but ( ) ( ) ( ) (7) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or ( ) ( ) ( ) (7) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site. The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Figure LU-6. b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of • Rancho Cucamonga. c) The site is located at the northwest corner of Almond Street and Amethyst Avenue and is characterized by residential development to the south and west; open space to the north; and a San Bernardino County flood control easement to the east. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this project. Design review is required prior to approval. City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility .enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. d) The project would increase the number of street lights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity. The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on the site plans which require review for consistency with City standards that requires shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the project site. The impact is not considered significant. 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or ( ) ( ) (7) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Williamson Act contract? • c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, ( ) ( ) ( ) (7) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? Rev. 9/13/2010 A-5 c> • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-01012 –ANDRESEN ARHITECTURE, INC. Page 4 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potential With Than Significannt I Mitigation Significant No Impaci Incorporated ImgaC1 !moan Comments: a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The site is located at the northwest corner of Almond Street and Amethyst Avenue and is characterized by residential development to the south and west, open space to the north and a San Bernardino County flood control easement to the east. There are approximately 209 acres of Farmland of Local Importance, Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga according to General Plan Table RC-2. Concentrations of Important Farmland are sparsely located in the southern and eastern parts of the City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Farmland in the southern portion of the City is characterized by industrial, residential, and commercial land uses and Farmland in the eastern portion of the City is within the Etiwanda area and planned for development. Further, a large number of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan FPEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no • Williamson Act contracts within the City. c) The site is located at the northwest corner of Almond Street and Amethyst Avenue and is characterized by residential development to the south and west; open space to the north; and a San Bernardino County flood control easement to the east. The nearest agricultural use is more than .5 miles west from the project site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. • 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (7) applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute ( ) (✓) (.) ( ) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) number of people? • Rev. 9/13/2010 g—aJ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-01012 —ANDRESEN ARHITECTURE, INC. Page 5 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact . Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.3), the proposed project would not interfere with the ability of the region to comply with Federal and State air quality standards for Criterion 1 Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations (local air quality impacts) or Criterion 2 Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP (consistency with the 2003 AQMP). Therefore the project is consistent with the 2003 AQMP and is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was'prepared and impacts evaluated. b) Short Term (Construction) Emissions - Continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, • heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. . Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again. Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are • required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a project-specific basis. Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. • Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. Rev. 9/13/2010 14754 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-01012 -ANDRESEN ARHITECTURE, INC. Page 6 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Sign cant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to • reduce PM1g emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM1g emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR), Nitrogen Dioxide (No2), Ozone (03), and Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM1o) would exceed South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) thresholds for significance; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. Lone Term (Operational) Emissions - In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan FPEIR; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 10) Landscape with native andlor drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. • 11) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planning programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. Rev. 9/13/2010 /QS- Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-01012 —ANDRESEN ARHITECTURE, INC. Page 7 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wm Then Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 12) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 13) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.3). c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 4.3), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The project proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive • receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is located more than .5 miles from the nearest sensitive receptor. The mitigation measure below will reduce impacts to a less-than-significant level: 14) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. e) Construction Odors (Short-term) may include odors associated with equipment use including diesel exhaust or roofing, painting and paving. These odors are temporary and would dissipate rapidly. Operation Odors (Long-term) are typically associated with the type of use. Odors from residential uses would be like cooking and gardening. Similarly common odors associated with mixed-use and commercial land uses would be expected (i.e. restaurants). Local odors from the majority of land uses would be similar to other urban areas and would not be considered significant. Industrial uses could create • objectionable odors and therefore are located away from residential uses and sensitive receptors. Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. • Rev. 9/13/2010 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-01012 —ANDRESEN ARHITECTURE, INC. Page 8 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact impact 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or ( ) • (✓) ( ) ( ) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat ( ) (• ) ( ) ( ) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife • corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? • e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation • Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments: a) The project site is located in an area developed with residential uses. A Biological Constraints Analysis was performed on the site to determine whether any biological resources exist that would pose a potential constraint or require additional surveys and/or permitting prior to project development (Ecorp Consulting, Inc. — December 21, 2009). The survey concluded that the following follow-up studies were required: 1) a Rare Plant Survey done during the appropriate blooming period; 2) a native tree inventory conducted by a certified arborist; and, 3) a pre-construction survey conducted prior to grading to locate burrowing owls and nesting birds. A follow-up Rare Plants Survey was conducted and determined that no rare plants were found on the site (Ecorp consulting, Inc. — May 28, 2010). Additionally, no special-status animals were observed on the site and the survey concluded that the potential for these species to occur was low. The native tree inventory is discussed in Section e. • Development of the site should have a less-than-significant impact on the environment with the implementation of the following mitigation measure: • Rev. 9/13/2010 A-S I Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-01012 —ANDRESEN ARHITECTURE, INC. Page 9 • Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: • Potentially wan an Significam Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 1) A pre-construction survey shall be conducted by a licensed biologist to determine whether any burrowing owls or nesting birds inhabit the site prior to approval of clearing or grading permits. The applicant shall implement all recommendations outlined by the.biologist in the pre-construction survey. b) The project site is in an area with natural communities. With the implementation of the • mitigation measures outlined above, no adverse impacts•are anticipated c) No wetland habitat is present on-site. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. d) The City is primarily located in an urban area that does not contain large, contiguous natural open space areas. Wildlife may potentially move through the north/south trending tributaries in the northern portion of the City and within the Sphere-of-Influence. The project location is adjacent to the City's Sphere-of-Influence that is primarily undeveloped. The proposal is to develop 3.2 acres of the 12.42-acre site for the construction on one singe-family unit. The City is required to acquire and/or protect open space areas that provide strategic wildlife corridors to vital habitat areas. Because this proposal is for one single-family dwelling unit, no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) There are heritage trees on the project site. An Arborist Report was prepared to determine • the health and viability of the on-site trees (Paul Chaney (Certified Arborist) — December 1, 2009). The report concluded that it is appropriate to preserve a number of the on-site trees due of their compatibility with the development of the site, including the Fuel Modification Plan (approved on January 19, 2011). Development of the site should have a less-than-significant impact on the heritage trees with the implementation of the following mitigation measures: 2) All trees that do not interfere with the proposed improvements and are . recommended for preservation by the Arborist Report (Chaney — December 1, 2009) shall be included in the Landscape Plan and protected in place. 3) Prior to approval of clearing or grading permits, prepare a plan that outlines the method of preservation or removal of all on-site trees. 4) Erect protective fencing 3 feet outside the drip-line of the tree canopies of the trees designation for preservation. 5) Construct a watering system under the preserved trees that will function for the duration of the construction activities. 6) Prune preserved trees to remove dead, dying, damaged or weakly attached branches. 7) If natural mulch layer under preserved trees is missing or damaged, restore by using tree chip. 8) Monitor tree condition bi-monthly, or as recommended by arborist. • 9) Read and understand the tree care industry work standards, especially ANSI A300, Part 1-2001 Pruning. Rev. 9/13/2010 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-01012 —ANDRESEN ARHITECTURE, INC. Page 10 Less Then • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 10) Read the included document in the Arborist Report on tree risk. This will help determine the needs for the subject site, frequency, and quality of tree treatments, especially pruning. 11) Plan a long-term strategy for the maintenance, replacement and removal of the existing trees. 12) Plan an arboricultural competent tree-scape for the new development, complete with nursery stock standards, planting specifications, pruning for structural development, and long-term maintenance. 13) The Arborist Report recommends against using replacement tree ratios for mitigation purposes for the removed trees. The best mitigation measures are the quality long term plans outlined in the report. Any legally required tree replacement shall be incorporated in the Landscape Plan. f) Neither the City nor the SOI are within an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved State habitat conservation plan area. The project site is not located within a local conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Figure RC-1. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: • a) Cause a substantial adverse change, in the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: a) The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). There will be no impact. b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6). Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation, and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during • grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve Rev. 9/13/2010 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-01012 –ANDRESEN ARHITECTURE, INC. Page 11 • Lees Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With nan Significant Mitigation Slpnt No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact Impact them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. • c) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the research performed at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Sphere-of-Influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per the Public Safety Element of the General Plan; therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed • salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Rev. 9/13/2010 P-60 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-01012 —ANDRESENARHITECTURE, INC. Page 12 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wan nan Significant Mitigation Significant No Incorporated nmryarated Impact Impact • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed project is in an area that is adjacent to the undeveloped Sphere-of-Influence. With the mitigation indicated in b and c above, no impacts to human remains should occur. Additionally, no known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or • death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as ( ) (V) ( ) ( ) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ( ) (V) ( ) ( ) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including ( ) ( ) (✓ ) ( ) liquefaction? iv) Landslides? ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, ( ) ( ) (V) ( ) or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the • disposal of wastewater? Rev. 9/13/2010 �/ / {eI Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-01012 —ANDRESEN ARHITECTURE, INC. Page 13 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Comments: a) The site is located within the Cucamonga Fault Zone. A Preliminary Soil Exam (GeoMat Testing Laboratories, Inc. -October 9, 2009)was performed to determine whether the project site was a suitable location for the proposed single-family residence. The report made a series of recommendations to limit damage to structures on the site in the event of a seismic event. The Red Hill Fault is approximately 2 miles south of the site. These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7.5 earthquakes is approximately 15 miles northeasterly of the City's northeastern boundary and the San Andreas, capable of up to Mw 8.2 earthquakes, is approximately 17 miles northeastern City's northeastern boundary. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Implementation of the recommendations made in the Preliminary Soils Exam and adherence to the Uniform Building Code and Standard Conditions should ensure that geologic impacts to the proposed improvements are less-than-significant with the following mitigation: 1) All recommendations outlined in the Preliminary Soil Exam (GeoMat Testing Laboratories, Inc. - October 9, 2009) and any subsequent soils exam shall be incorporated into the final Grading Plan and Structural Building Plans. b) The City of Rancho Cucamonga is within a designated Soil Erosion Control Area Exhibit 4.7-4 of the General Plan FPEIR. The proposed project will require the excavation, • stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to • strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 2) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM1g emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon • as possible. 3) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM1g emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 4) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,g emissions from the site during such episodes. . 5) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,g emissions. c) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.7) indicates that there is a potential for the hillside • areas at the northern end of the City and in the SOI for slope failure, landslides, and/or erosion. Areas subject to slope instability contain slopes of 30 percent or greater. Landslides may be induced by seismic activity, rain, or construction. The City Hillside Development Regulations prohibits the development within slopes of 30 percent or greater Rev. 9/13/2010 R- Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-01012 —ANDRESEN ARHITECTURE, INC. Page 14 Lees Than • Significant Leas Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wm man Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Imoad and limit the number of units that could be constructed within the Hillside Residential and Very Low Density Residential designations in the Hillside areas. The site is within an Earthquake hazard zone. Soil types on-site consist of Cieneba-Rock Outcrop Complex association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. The project will be required to implement all recommendations made by the soils engineer. No adverse impacts are anticipated. • d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Cieneba-Rock Outcrop Complex according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. This soils type is typically found on north-facing slopes and is subject to rapid runoff and is used chiefly for the spring grazing of animals and for water shed. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will install a septic system that will be required to be permitted by the City's Building Department and meet all related environmental regulations. Additionally, the project is for one single-family dwelling unit and accessory buildings and shall be required to comply with Chapter 5 of the Santa Ana Region Basin Plan. If the site is unsuitable for the installation of a septic system, the applicant shall be required to connect to the City's existing sewer system. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: • a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to • Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) • adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Rev. 9/13/2010 ft-l�3 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-01012 —ANDRESEN ARHITECTURE, INC. Page 15 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wnn Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) (✓) O ( ) loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: a) Development within the City may utilize or generate hazardous materials or wastes. This is usually associated with individual households, small business operations, and maintenance activities like paints, cleaning solvents, fertilizers, and motor oil. Additionally, through construction activities that would use paints, solvents, acids, curing compounds, grease, and oils. These materials would be stored and used at individual sites. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full-service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local , regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. No adverse impacts are expected. b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full-service • Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. No adverse impacts are anticipated. c) There are no schools located within 1/4 mile of the project site. The nearest existing or proposed school is approximately 1 mile from the site. No impacts are anticipated. d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated. e) The site is not located within an Airport Land Use Plan according to the General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1 and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 7 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport • and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) There are no private airstrips within the City. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. g) The City has a developed roadway network that provides emergency access and evacuation routes to existing development. New development will be located on a site that has access to existing roadways which will be improved as part of this project. The • City's Emergency Operation Plan, which is updated every three years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the event of a disaster. Because the project is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev. 9/13/2010 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-01012 —ANDRESEN ARHITECTURE, INC. Page 16 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: aotemia r Mnm han Significant Mitigation Si nt No Imact Incrorated Imam Impact h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from a wind-driven fire in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone found in the northern part of the City. The proposed project site is located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone according to General Plan Figure PS-1, The City recognizes the risk and has adopted policies and Standard Conditions that limit uses to Very Low density residential development and Hillside residential uses in these areas to limit property exposed to wildland fire hazards. The project shall prepare a Fire Protection Plan to outline appropriate measures to address fire hazards. Therefore, the following wildland fire mitigation measure shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) The project shall comply with Chapter 7A of the California Building Code (CBC), which includes building standards for the Wildand-Urban Interface Fire Area. The standards call for the use of ignition-resistant materials and design to inhibit the intrusion of flame or burning embers projected by a vegetation fire and help reduce losses resulting from repeated cycles of interface fire disasters. 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge ( ) (7) ( ) • ( ) requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) • substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a. lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on-or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) • the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? • Rev. 9/13/2010 cC Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-01012 —ANDRESEN ARHITECTURE, INC. Page 17 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Fptenuanr With han Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) that would impede or redirect flood flows? • i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation.by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? () () ( ) (/) Comments: • a) Water service will be provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The project will install a septic system that is required to be permitted by the City's Building Department and meet all related environmental regulations. If the site is unsuitable for the installation of a septic system, the applicant shall be required to connect to the City's existing sewer system. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit. The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. • Construction activities covered.under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: • Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. • Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. • Perform inspections of all BMPs. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). To comply with the NPDES, the project construction contractor will be required to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post- construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WQMP prepared by HP Engineering, Inc. (June 2, 2010), which identifies Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded • soils, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and Rev. 9/13/2010 6' Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-01012 —ANDRESEN ARHITECTURE, INC. Page 18 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With han Sim0cant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures would be required to control additional storm water effluent: Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from-the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance • program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Post- Construction Operational: 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by HP engineering, Inc. June 2, 2010, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. • 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD, approximately 35 percent of the City's water is currently provided • from water supplies coming from the underlying Chino and Cucamonga Groundwater Basins. CVWD complies with its prescriptive water rights as managed by the Chino Basin Rev. 9/13/2010 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-01012 —ANDRESEN ARHITECTURE, INC. Page 19 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wm ho Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Watermaster and will not deplete the local groundwater resource. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Figure RC-3. The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation; however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be approximately 300 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs but will not be a significant impact. CVWD has plans to meet this increased need to the year 2030. No impacts are anticipated. c) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on the site . The project includes extending the inlet pipe and moving the current location of the headwall that directs flows from Demens Creek under Almond Street in order to install street and equestrian trail improvements. This change will not affect the flow capacity of the facility. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities and the adjacent Demens Creek. A Hydrology and Hydraulics Study was performed on the site (HP Engineering), which concluded that storm runoff can be safely intercepted by an inlet structure and diverted through an existing 18-inch storm drain into Demens Creek. Additionally, the projected additional runoff from the developed site is considered not significant considering the existing topography and the size of the site. In file with the • Planning Department, is a letter from the Army Corps of Engineers stating that the project is not subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities and Demens Creek, which have been determined capable of handling the projected runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities and Demens Creek, which have been determined capable of handling the projected runoff. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on-or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm • event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site is for new development or significant redevelopment; therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Rev. 9/13/2010 PHO Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-01012 —ANDRESEN ARHITECTURE, INC. Page 20 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wln non Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices • (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) The project site is located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. A Hydrology and Hydraulics Study was performed on the site (HP • Engineering), which concludes that runoff can be safely intercepted by an inlet structure and diverted through an existing 18 inch storm drain in to Demens Creek. Additionally, the projected additional runoff from the developed site is considered not significant considering the existing topography and the size of the site. All new construction of residential units is required to comply with the City's Floodplain Management Regulation which requires the implementation of various flood hazard reduction measures. Additionally, the project will be required to construct required storm drain facilities or payment of fees for storm drain system improvements. No adverse impacts are expected. h) The project site is located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. A Hydrology and Hydraulics Study was performed on the site (HP Engineering), which concludes that runoff can be safely intercepted by an inlet structure and diverted through an existing 18-inch storm drain in to Demens Creek. Additionally, the projected additional runoff from the developed site is considered not significant considering the existing topography and the size of the site. All new construction is required to comply with the City's Floodplain Management Regulation which requires the implementation of various flood hazard reduction measures. Additionally, the project will be required to construct required storm drain facilities or payment of fees for storm drain system improvements. No adverse impacts are expected. i) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Figure PS-6. The project site is located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to • General Plan Figure PS-5. All new construction is required to comply with the City's Floodplain Management Regulation which would ensure that future development is Rev. 9/13/2010 Initial Study for City of'Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-01012 —ANDRESEN ARHITECTURE, INC. Page 21 • Less Than Significant Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Nth Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact adequately anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, or lateral movement of structures within the floodplain. No adverse impacts are expected. j) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow • impacts to the level of non-significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. • 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ( ) ( ) ( ) (/) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? • c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan ( ) ( ) • ( ) (✓) or natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The site is located at the northwest corner of Almond Street and Amethyst Avenue and is characterized by residential development to the south and west, open space to the north and a San Bernardino County flood control easement to the east. There is existing single-family development to the south and west. The project will become a part of the larger community. No adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The developable portion of the project site land use designation is Very Low Residential. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection, SCAG's Compass Blueprint, or SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan. As such, no impacts are anticipated. c) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to the General Plan Figure RC-4, and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. Additionally, in file with the planning department is a Biological Constraints Analysis that concluded that no special-status animals were observed on the site and the potential for these species to occur was low. • Rev. 9/13/2010 /4-76 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-01012 —ANDRESEN ARHITECTURE, INC. Page 22 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Sipicant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1; therefore, there is no impact. b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site; therefore, there is no impact. 11. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of • other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) • levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ( ) (/) ( ) ( ) ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comments: a) The project site is not within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Figure PS-9 at build-out. Although the project is not within Figure PS-9 of the General Plan, the proposed development is adjacent to existing dwelling units and may create noise levels exceeding City Standards. Therefore, the area identified will reduce noise levels to a less-than-significant level. • Rev. 9/13/2010 n _7 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-01012 —ANDRESEN ARHITECTURE, INC. Page 23 • Less Than Significant Leas Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PoteMially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Exterior: 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. b) The uses associated with this type of project normally do not induce ground borne vibrations. As such, no impacts are anticipated. c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. The proposed construction of the single-family unit will not significantly increase traffic; hence are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project. d) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.12) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site • stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 2) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a • national holiday. 3) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 4) Any proposed perimeter block walls shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment; however, do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measures shall then be required: 5) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that • do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Rev. 9/13/2010 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-01012—ANDRESEN ARHITECTURE, INC. Page 24 Less Than • Significant Leas Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wdh Than Signffcant Mitigation Sicant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact e) The site is not located within an Airport Land Use Plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. Located approximately 7 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is off-set north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? • c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) The project is for one single-family unit and is located in a residential area and will not • induce population growth. Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. No impacts are anticipated. b) The project site is vacant. Because the property is vacant there will be no displacement of housing or people. Therefore no adverse impact is expected. c) The project site is vacant. Because the property is vacant there will be no displacement of housing.or people. Therefore no adverse impact is expected. 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) c) Schools? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) d) Parks? ( ) ( ) ( ) • (✓) e) Other public facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Comments: a) The site, located at the northwest corner of Almond Street and Amethyst Avenue, would • be served by a fire station located approximately 2 miles from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities, or alteration of any existing facilities, Rev. 9/13/2010 /1-73 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-01012 —ANDRESEN ARHITECTURE, INC. Page 25 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially can an Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project to lessen the future demand and impacts to fire services. No impacts are anticipated. b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. c) The Alta Loma School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve the project area. The proposed project is for the development of one residence on a site that is zoned for residential development. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the School Impact Fees. With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Districts are not considered significant. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is located 2 miles from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. • e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Though, as part of the project, the applicant will install a portion of the Community Trail along the Almond Street frontage. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.14), there will be a projected increase in library space demand but with the implementation of standard conditions the increase in Library Services would be mitigated to less than significant impact. Additionally, the Paul A. Biane Library has an additional 14,000 square foot shell of vacant library space that is planned for future Library use. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Therefore no adverse impact is expected. 14. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: • a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is located 2 miles from the project site. This project is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks Rev. 9/13/2010 ) -74 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC200B-01012 —ANDRESEN ARHITECTURE, INC. Page 26 Lass Than • Significant Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wm han Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact or other recreational facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. b) See a) response above. 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that result in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) • (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Comments: • a) Implementation of the proposed project will generate 13 vehicle trips daily. The proposed project includes the development of one single-family residence. The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each single-family will generate 13 trips daily. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.16), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in project design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards and improve the road connection from Almond Street and Amethyst Avenue. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of • building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. No impacts are anticipated. b) The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each single-family residence will • generate .67 two-way peak hour trips daily. In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose Rev. 9/13/2010 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-01012 —ANDRESEN ARHITECTURE, INC. Page 27 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Nth Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact • appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a • Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permit. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. No impacts are anticipated. c) Located approximately 7 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is off-set north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. No impacts are anticipated. d) The project is in an area that is developed with residential uses. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site and improvements to the road connection from Almond Street and Amethyst Avenue. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. No impacts are anticipated. • • e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access. No impacts are anticipated. f) The project design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will, therefore, not create an inadequate • parking capacity. No impacts are anticipated. g) The project is for a single-family dwelling and accessory buildings. No impact to support transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e.g., bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc.) plans will occur. 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm ( ) ( ) ( ) (1) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) project from existing entitlements and resources, or • are new or expanded entitlements needed? Rev. 9/13/2010 7 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-01012 —ANDRESEN ARHITECTURE, INC. Page 28 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) provider, which serves or may serve the project, that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient. permitted ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and ( ) ( ) ( ) (V) regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) The project will install a septic system, thus will not require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. b) The project will install a septic system, thus will not require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control • Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project is served by the CVWD water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. No impacts are anticipated. . e) The project will install a septic system, thus will not require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities. No impacts are anticipated. f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. • • • Rev. 9/13/2010 7 7 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-01012—ANDRESEN ARHITECTURE, INC. Page 29 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Sigmficant Mitigation Sigmficani No Impact Incorporated impact Impact 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? • c) Does the project have environmental effects that will ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, • either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Figure RC-4 or as identified in the Biological Constraints Analysis provided for the project. Additionally, the project is for one single-family unit. Based on the mitigation provided in Section 4 of this Initial Study, development of the 3.2 acres of the site should be mitigated to a level of • less-than-significant. b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2010 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forest Resources, Air Quality, Climate Change and Mineral Resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial • adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels. Rev. 9/13/2010 �7g Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-01012 —ANDRESEN ARHITECTURE, INC. Page 30 Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once • construction activities were completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels. Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with biological impacts. Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier PEIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier . analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (X) General Plan FPEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified May 19, 2010) (X) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (X) Arborist Report (Paul Chaney (ISA Certified Arborist), December 1, 2009) • (X) Seismic Study (Geosphere Consultants, Inc., April 13, 2009) (X) Preliminary Soils Investigation (GeoMat testing Laboratories, Inc., October 9, 2009) (X) Hydrology and Hydraulics Study (HP Engineering, February 10, 2010) (X) Biological Report (Ecorp Consulting, Inc., May 28, 2010 and December 21, 2009) (X) Fire Protection Plan (Firewise 2000 Inc., December 9, 2010) • • Rev. 9/13/2010 14-7q Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-01012—ANDRESENARHITECTURE, INC. Page 31 • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point when ly no sig ..nt environmental effects would occur. Applicants Signature: t- a.._ - — - Date: r yN I ///ACC I Print Name and Title: DI ?li . in ; rri \1 Q ) p(� f\y1*\\te d-- • • • • • Rev. 9/13/2010 nD City of Rancho Cucamonga • • • s" MITIGATION MONITORING ' • PROGRAM Project File No.: Hillside Design Review DRC2008-01012 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP)has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared incompliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. • 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management- The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2008-01012 —ANDRESEN ARCHITECTURE, INC. Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as • determined by the project planner or responsible City department,to monitor specific mitigation • activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to atop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. • 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. • U �) Li w a1 ww,!.t C m a fas • C o o ^* lc U tom;. 6. .�. c = ` U O O a� R V O u) 2 f“.; N N (V N o CD i`i WI Q - i4 O ,- w 'y `;;Til N > 0 tt r ?: C4 Q N Q N {' d I. ID CO a',:.:, C CO O u ) €0 7 t V- '"tt'' ° .a °' d ' � a a 0 0 _ = LL > eNi a 0 r Q k5 e N 0 (0 N J R = RTC-ESS CU l0 CU co Q w o t,= a a a a o . e o `0 0 0 F- Z =w_ t ' .0 aa)i 1) m E > > F- 3 (I) CD > xl?. C o �I ri C .fYr:'k N O 0 ':k r a o c a S o ' , 0 � LL v v v m r _ ∎-4 U' o' .E ra Z ci a ``tea N 'i71¢;: C _ _ .-r 0 0 e .ti O O ai u) i'm a) r°': o a 0 O Z p cc w *4rj'j: a a O w a 6 = 'O Ej a) 0 Z-•-0 a) C 0 ' C >.a,+ 0 to .y :? 0cmcc .0 .c 0» omuo - 0 � o a Z E °; .-` m s a) m 0-2 — L- 20 ,- 20u)a.,.. n.. axi d t c O Q ��'V V N ... _U ._ y N y ` CO coa C Es,p a) a Z 'ti a> E o N c 0 0 = - - I— 0 ?,nra coma) da 0 = o � � 0a3 ova 0 Q N N ', k. o En a w m ac c � o O o y 0 c cv )ray m d > S a ° — a, o a, a) Cf E F- C C ."` a ° moa) 0 c k.0 = 5 ° .c - EUc 'to Q ; J a .c a y a) o 0) -o 2 E m o — m — 0 • 0 �% '"' .' m o N C c n U c ? o 0 c o c E COO to c m m N 12 M1 to CU O 0 a5 c (a `� N C w 0 y C Q N m N 0 ca m a c o w a o V 6 S .I. c m En (a (0 > O O 'p O N N O U t.. (A O) O m X Z y,,,. a) E Va) EE = cc �a0 da O Co (A = :CJ E y O c N U ... O 0 = •c N - to w N �O N 0. p_ o - = c U E y -o U c n a c > 0 m c o m vNi N a Z a- O Aa 03,:::',. ° . .0 2a; Nan "0moE vm - 3 E2 T 0 O) z_ O 0 N a) 'y N a) a) a' _ O N a - m N p m CI • L 2 = r4.!.' t c g a) N -c 0 � 3 .0 ac a) oai yQ LL c C r y o -0 c .o 0 `6 cw to' 2 -O E U .+ +' 00 �' m C U C (a U O) U) N D a3 N E 0) c a] c 0 l0 fA E m:.. 0 C 0 ` .- c 0 o a c o m o a) c 0 — r .c v m -0=, c .- ._ an d o E c E m = o) _ m E o O i0 rn d ff.to). O m _) w e c_ in w o .a a) a I) - rn m e a o 2 ? 0 a o w F. a V Ca 0 ° ° 0 , aa) aa)i vS 'o• > 0 a) m m — a) m o) o d - E „Q';; Qoa) oE2o aa -oa) a) a) .SUEta Qna .c Qc A--83 a) U 1 o ° w m o- • E • O O U '� mC o v v c v v U) Z N N N N . N V Q V V V U) it 'O C 0) C CD at w 0) 10 > ❑ w C O w a m .0• .0 +-1T 2 > 0 0 'a 0 a C C C C Q u) 0 0 U) • CO N C C C C C C CO it it Co m Co 0 _ a a a a a 0 0 0 0 o . o `o o `o `o `o ca co o a3 a3 a3 a3 a3 0) I_ 0) 2 0).. 0) 2 C w C > > > '> '> > � c � c Cc Cc d N N a) a> m m 7 p 0 O = O F > C C Ir C C ❑ o ❑ U ❑ O ❑ U • c) > C U t C N CD ,+°' 0) O• 0) 2 u. o U U 0 U 0 U U 0 U • rn o c a `O m - • C C O O n2 a) O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 K2 m m on m m m m CO CO CO ❑ m p O O C C U O O -. W a) m -o T C N a `m u, -o = Lac d '; :N ,5 .c m 'm o a) O ` o -oo `o .E = mu°, Carty o 00 o ❑ mo p. (n $ 2 = o ° .L.. N n O c m O N O U co s ° = O E � Co � U `o a) 3 - 'fin d u, m n u mm Ea 6 E co < ° E c c m o mr c a o 0 0 .o m 205 w 0 r ..= -o Co co = m 0 T O U 0) '- -o -o h m L m m 0) m (n �' n " a) U a`) -o a) u) a) o E -c 0) c O c 3 v o ° � CO' o a) a) Ec 66130 mou, 0 BOO � � 3 -o CO — - oiri o . T -c c ct xc CO u, EE r6 m a) To C a) C m f o "° C C N p p .o o O N O y V O a) Co C E 'O 0).a) u) O N C >. a) "' �' o N >° m p > Q1 O 'O co ° C O C m o) O' m n c m o C < '> U 3 y a 7 CO y v CV 6Ui m ,- c a) N n o m U 0• m o E n � m > ao � a-oi o- o � o a ° ani o mo � � � a) 0 a O 5 o C) =O 0) 0) C '> m co c N - ° �' C ° E U N U so-w C ° o T oc)a 1313 chi vi 3 a ,� u, > v a) c a c - O 0 CO a o m `o m '- L c' m w Cto c .0 m o a s m 00 ID w CD 3a o co m a`) wo o) E c c a., , m `� �?�6a m • N a) co m O U) t a) a1 '6 N T. E (n V a) O > Co in m .c a n ° C U) L O — W --0 < C — m CO O m 05 C C O N m L O U x 0 y U C 3 y O E C J .0 U o co ... i «U C 'o -o rnn 0CD3 cc .-E a am 6nd3 oma) 6n�5 � 6°13 Cn36n fro', m � � p U t a U E QC F N � m vt _b7 L — 0 o 0 co coa C E . • O O � U C C m 0 V V C V V 0 2 V V N V N N N N 0 l 'O C d w o s_ w a) to > 0 • C 3 .�O-•, 'O N O 0 L w 'i CD CD 2 > a a 0 0 0 Cr fn N N N N N C C C C C C C fa as co co co co co C C Q Q Q Q Q Q Q ..- 0 O O :. U O O O O O O O 0 - o 2 3 3 3 3 3 _ F C - a) a) d a) a) a3) a3) E d o a) � 0 F > 0 o m m m m K m m C U C G p y N w a- • O E O 2 LL U U m 0 Q Q Q Q M co m 4 O C C O O a* N i LL' w m m m Q m m m m 0 °`o va 3 om 00 - =.- m - m 0tcuCaL Q co co o m a E y E o N ,_ L U1 f1 CO ¢ L p_= L 3 CT) p °° m tu C..) fn a°i m °1 Ey o ai > >, 3 3 0 a�'i a) o o a.� 3 a) m N — @ 0 co d Q to L O C �C U a) U '> U C N mL N @ co C E fa 2 a) fo ` C C co a) C — N m ° N L (o CO CD "0>) -- o Naiad m-C o >-• E " E; a� in0 CC0 0 - = C To o O f6 'O L O fo 0 r to fD ° la CO O ` C O in N fa a p t . 5 ? 3 -`p c c E9 'u o,m 'u E yQ C ° �2 Q.- N '5 U C C 5 O fa O U Q) t Q m a) N J co •• N C (�� > o � to .N p v n o) 0) E @ E _ a) o � oY 0 = f` V U a C E C E O E O E = U N > it- 6 Z Q@ co N a) O fo Q fa = O --• N O N O) O L O L QI N O =) co C O C N ° Q 5 > C O U U O C O N S 5 ` a) O j [.1 N C N U >' C g (o O E C p s ° 'O d N CO C J C O N D ' ° O C 0 :.. C 't E d to � - E o a ) m p 5 a`) o m� o c � a o m a= v ,c � � O 0 c .o .0 _ o 0 0 E m= _3 m P3 0 S 03 0 m .E .Q o 3 a) . Q-p E • CC u) in 2a nou p3 � L ° ° . Q � co ' > > J � a ° pd 4E To lo- N ? 0 ? •3 m ? O � mm 0 . -o a 0> Tux oU .- p c U o CO �n al EC7 o o o c n N -NO d � ° c ° m ° E v = � . ° o � 2E Uft (`o2 Hm Foci o dal QEs -cc a> Q.w030_ oc A- w 'r8$txP Q yGq c E o U 4F • ii C e` ri R O x+n;A" v v V V' V yr v v v (O Z }• f.T1 N N N N N N N N N N c;}ii w4 N r4 , Ts pw.: FJ:i' It -a..h F- a) 141 c •-• te,;, at R > 0 N$i ny C N O G k ;`; a u ` Y : c.: es• = m :r N a r.. ,?Y 5 > 0 0 0 U U a a a U 0 ;IAA' µk`d r. ., r?{t:41 0 O O O O O O O O O *Ka 3 3 3 3 3 .3 3 3 3 3 0 Q w O : i > > Q j 0 � R j 0 j o ) o � o j a) 'j a Ts R E R p a p a a p a R a p a p a FP 2- ° U U U U U U C) ° Ct o) O) O rn c C E " .411. c R C C t C C v C E v C E v C v C E .0 C o v C C C N *Ity R - O co ="1:. @ R b ( (0 1.7 er@ > m R j m co j m (a j o R j o R F > wOJa OJa OJd ❑ Ja. OJO_ OJa OJd OJd OJO_ OJO_ 0) > C O f,ILl C �+' T. 1 o 0 IiY;R4 r C � �"I • 11 LL .'�u5 CO m CO C] CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO gill t rE3 O �::.�,,P O ,. in 5 4:-111a a a a a a aa r• ° ")'J a w a.U R 2)4-0 R N 00 ° O) S N 0 .0 C U C 'O 0 v Y • C a) of L 0)V4,'; >. - N .0 O) V) ._ O 'p IO O `) O 0) 0) a O E ° +L' C �a,1 d 3 > 0) O 0 Ct o 2 a C p ' . o CO c C 3 'c t p) l.n1, 2 o aLN ° 22 om v2 E 'a ° 2 ° o "-:,.{(56p.,, � � aca Eo _9 °'m .E 113 a) to' co E Z,a a0E w� ° aa0 .c a) a`) a ya) aa&&i co m o, E yo - vo R _ _0=Ft cm a.n - asc EE `oa '- ° ( ° o ;2.N U O R v ._ a) R a n o 0 O..0 'n N 0 c p M M I1 a) ' a) - v O c L.. a) ... ai '- C - }' % a) _.+ a w C .3 R O l0 g O a) O _.. O c N R N Q .t.. ° ar4Laa) w v a � . o 00. o Gtia+:, t . F 5 c m p _ 144' m 3 �) o P o a o m 0 C a da° � ,,c t a) o ai c a) E ate) CO p)t.. a ,o) c ° > u°)) o .c Eo c E = ac o 'tEcO .o N o a) o - a- v ,+ >, E - E '-m c oLc ° E w � E � Ea) a.. o a) — a�cimv Z *3 a) oL QC 2U J E a o�) o) v N o 02 c v E - Z E Ws c c i - 0) vv - OE cc2ro � Cv N� a � = = c c ¢ oi � i. a) O , o o N c E m nom.. U U d •U o p) 0 a) .n >. o j0 >• -°p .0 c O vE• o Oro . Ovoc cN C � E � v >, ° Nm - S (0Q ,::& N a co o v m C a ° —_ c a) _ c o R a) E a`) '� c 3 cr 2 aR) p1 V N+ ` O) m O) N yin a) > 7 p a) O R 2 a) U .c . o v a) w ,C L v")N _ O C - >� R O O -_ ? N 3 S Z y O 0) ° c N O N c "Ed" w o al 0 R o o 0--8 R o a R c o m E = o c FL- �i a • o c0 ;'° ° v c mo I a) aE) Q 'E mom ° m o 13 (.6 o >, E -r; .J t -2 4; oY 'N >. o c ,a ,p?! a) of o f EEi o a> o oa o c i aR 2 3 a) o � R m ` a m - E )�O-? aco3 °— Ec — ETL � oaE o cm .0 3 RE oT me m � aQ U C w a c E :A". • ° C U U L C m 0 .Cr Z R t C C' V V (/7 Z N N N s�`- a M Cr) C') CO N rii. -D L i_' a) C 6: , m 0 > O C D ,O `,` a o U L U U U , '; a ° 0 0 a 0. a a C N 0 N ' `5 Q) a) N Q) 0 '> m '> 0 '-> m ,^ m CO m c my g 0) y `z;'.d 3 3 3 0 Ill C rn C C C N > a) m m Co C ' . N D C) s: - °• °2 �+ m m 4 i U 0 0 0 w) 0 3i:P a) C .4,',,I a o "' . a5 r O O O O 4r,,- i3 O a a a a 3 a a a a aj O yia ma) a >. m a mp c a) -o a Q m a) v a crr -TT" .c )3 ai p C v .o •- aa)i coo ¢ s c 2 `m - � N a � o ` '- Eau, _ E ,...° a0 C )Q i) N N N C a) h)!1 U N E 0 3 N "0 CO - d O O a)oars and a) Y 'mo5 o i)w' omoo ;Jac cEa) 3m CO E > � . E d a U aj o) O_ N 'C a N "0 N O , O" m o 0 o m ° m a x.p: a) m o m ( E c o co c o- - v o Sm ") mmaEEo0 .cI- m (.3 a°) cmi i` cv) •m ° m Na) C00- w OZ' rncao a) .E ,� 1,, mo) c0 ° - g 5 a mm .X OmCd C . m= -c a) r, oEEm mU ,_ cU u, .c) ° m m1° � �. m c 4 o) 0) a a) c o c ° a) . E > > 'm EmmE _ ,?�„ om ° Err o '° -a ° oN £ = Ea'E >,.c wcaE EE ° a�is oo)- 4O c o ° - T.)2m co - o rno n= E 0 E _ ! 3nz m °) om m 2 0, ma) � ° a) 0 .o O m m E 3 y 5 E ° N 0 c ) ;a ` ° o a >,. ° o '.' Et m °) E m m y y C N > O o ° C o a o) E !IV;, m a Q- = >• cat = =CO) N N y E CI N o ° U v E E E. aaE = m tU) o aa, m co 0) U E E a > m o ° a U .mc '(tao) 0 N ¢ — o c a' a) f d a U o o a) o a) a 0 CD fa 0 la m ='N m 0i ) � C ,9000 2_ E 0 E 2 E1 n a`) a) E ° 0) B o w e d m .E o , E o) m - ...: `1) -Ca .= E u c E 2 . C C o c m c C 0 'o" 0 a u°): m 'O FO Thti o O W E p m 0 N O C o .4 N • L C O N .0 m 0 O a) ... 01 a) m O ,-00 O °- ° N ° N 4 o C° 0 E mE EaE -oo -am<. () ,nom ., ° -a°) o m ai Ea)E m o e a o) a Q a s m 0 cem a m � r � C o > E s C a, -0 mm ° coco 0 > >. m -, c c o 0 (3 ,1 co ° E Eco °) '5 ia a c m > � � °' o. Eis '= ,.,_. m o @ > u°1it at 3 `m U EvE a m a o m am ca I a) 0 c oco '- a c E O 0 • = U CI i m o v CD 2 M V V V r> en N To -0 C o C al i — a) m > O C . O y a )o o p s - y `o ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 2 > a a a a ❑ ❑ t t -c o a a a a a a c 2) 0) E 0) E 0) .. 0 O « o O. `0 o 0 0 to w .9 m aa)) atea)) aa)) aa)) E a`, aa)) a>> a>> 0> a>> a>> as _C U 0 = N_ a Cr O 0 0 w 2 LL U m m m ❑ ❑ S 0) . 0 c • so C - C 0 0 O a2 to 0: w 0. 0. 0_ 03 0_ 0. • O .° N i' TEL L N '0 O D .m. L C .0 a) a) a) m .m0 r o O O O m T E r. m-- °1 � c L c n m o 3 = c E -- in.c aoi co.-> .m T 9 ..+ m 3 `. co` m � N r � � m o-o0 E m °c E cQ a.°_ E o° � .w mi0 m � O o w. ® m m 3V o .2 .c ° o `om -OmooEOa-0 a) (7) 5 0) m W > >,. w...0 LC' � = n m � v, Ct , -eod ._ c 00 0 ! m _ vo � oc 'o o co)=) Emma) CuE �.. 0 � u � m" a) m � E � 0E .o 0) o L d m O _m 0) o a) o-= L m'- = m 0 La '5 a) co e U co a> 3 a o o .` o .@ L 3 °c a o u C c •n E m E `0 0 o i� /' a c �? O _o > w E U N m u, o ❑c d m o °H co OI.0 .r0 O E g c a o m E .0 a> v - U -o m• aa)) o = aa) V) a) o @airwc 0 = Ed in cLmm � o mZ' ° mac Scow c EmnmcOm E0 0@ ° L � LE E mm 0) CO o > � ow '� - 4- IDsNV ,.. 0o � m� r 3WtW.c5 EEo ooA 2 . 0 a-o E W .0 •- Co o y ° m a ° am o c CO acv m 6 c V o m � c O E o o .- = oc o = r E o -2 d 0_ � , -t = m o O N 2 Q"' N O . _ V O O O N 0 0 C y O C O co` O .0 ... e O co m � L.. r O E C O O = m a) a U -o m C N ,- a) � o L mo0m 0> j .c . 00ca) a) ' a a) Z n _ E2c 2--- (DE Ei- A a U p>. U 2 0 .m. '? Z a) N O- m j ° Q m C 92 a -c o ..-• m c 0 (a c E E 'o 0 0 E a E -c o o o .E '7) d c . 0 c a> ' 0 = ai = SC C c '0 = .=_ ° 0) c a) = m N m E ai E N m 'O 0 N o -o N ` U O O c O O y C • cc EmN � @ao> .E go> o30 Ea, .� 2mE a) - -E mw m` aimnb _ o0E • 00 0 m0. 7 0 al c o L 0. m N ..0 o N 0 .(0 o) OI .-co).°-n-.E c = °>3 c C — d m e E m >, aa))to and m o co_ d � U ° >.a o i_t o .°- 7 no c 0 a - = t y c° m o a) Q C O > > o 0 C D 0_ -oamo < m mN > cam .cw na.o < a) E -a 0 `oa � o) o o -omU W002 m o m m - = ° -mo0awwEm:2 ° P- 0 3 > ' L. * r '- . c � asr � 0"0,b‘,..• O O P" h = c !i,w t7 J tm O CrS ;t CO Z ;„o V V V Q rt,wgd N 4_eCyti_ vp,..: Sg;Y co 1r7 r, C J z y,x w CO '4t 5 > 0 w. C .,)R�; .r p y i. p w iilk Z. > ",.. , It - O O rn ° gig-`1: o) 2 rn2 a m2 rn2 yh F 3, C C ti, C C C C C V C w i , O O O = o O ,;;A V..f > r3a 0 O D ° O ° 0 ° D o ,4.. ) .A 0) >. i'z..S i`,2,'; t = d _ r • 5LL 1i O 0 0 0 0 4; ti Iiiyi Jr i a F `r';;b = ii NV a m c# w o 9"`a )C 0 .r E01. litili 1 _ _ V.Orc men ii ci o me wc ° L ° w 2 co ° L"K.,,* 1 (n ) a7 L al C m O CO w O CO '- t £' E m Cl) 3 2 0 tl , I,. cu_ EC DD`ov moo c ��— . � 2 ° ytl? ra+ E wd ° L w o m L ' ¢0o Co 3 < 00 )'Q c,�c a vi aU cai ° ° 0 a U te" m ( w rC,.i d 0. a> 16 Cf), CL O w '° ' (13 I... aci C7 .c .'mmo 3 yS2 0 • LmL iN,�r J N Q D_ w U .0 N vi a) C co r • .' _1aa) co 30EE' @ a) UaLyv u) .E o — m ot7 ', o .0 .0 o o c — = a w E N ap ° N; Y �z C N w O d `o N L L 0 'a ea•— w la71 m N C 'a'-?'X w f- o ct c (6 N -0 "° > .CaO E N Q N C Sari 0 0 4,:. C C C d w e "° N m w o 0 >, E N = as .- 0 C ::MI! • ' -) 0 (a ._ .o N N O C L cv N C N to C) .N :'O'1 a N 0 vNy CO fa 'C _C N OQ' N N N 'E,- E .o CpN C N ,a .C N day w O7 (0 -O 2 O O "° a T D N U N N m U "° O N E E .Y{01 CO li C . N O O fa '� L 0) V w C J fa a) -o - C a) a) i'°% a) N w c a w co ` a) w • c E _ ow C 0 o E g o x - 'oL o �; C C 0 co N t d m a C N N Lx 0 ° y ' E °' co a) — ¢ a) a) ° ° v m � c ;co)cC ° a) w o 00w0 m 0 ai c N '2 U w t� 10—w , o- oEp � ° d w vN o -° .E wc) 1 >> c w w ' 'v w d 'haP: C' [ Ny co 0 o E .0 'p .• ,L.., 'w O 0 'E = co N w E CO > N .� 1a3'? 5E C7?. QWOLN F- wCC 3o u- u.) o >. 0w° 0cC cad ilm'i 1 '. . ,Tm01. g 0, U o m a co E 0 0 • v U c v co Z N N - 'O C 0 w t O 01 > O C o O A 0 0 •-• w 2 > a N co 0 0 O 0 'm 0 E N E ,w .0) � > rna Co 0 C N r 0 N rL LL Q 4D Ol y C ao N C C 0 o U w ° m -= = N y0 L U 0 N E "O "0" .0 N Nw C A a� LLc `od `o 10C .N CO U O_c t ,m T co L d N U -= c.) C `p 0 _C N L C 0) 0) N N • L 3 f0 Vl .0 > 0I L = a 3 m 0) = O L >, LT- 0 0 ' -6 .0 LL E• p 0.... C ' E 'o O E N d N C '0 V U CA U O '- C N ,.E E c U .p� U m d U vl Q y N Q L C L N N 0) 07 0 V "" N — -0 0) N • C = NJ O ,0 C L 0) N co N C O E 0 `? • 0 0 'p CO -p N 0) O N E n O N y - O) U i7 E 0 O. L l0 co L E 16 j 5 H U N H E a E uz. d T9.y1 A:a V V V V V N N N N ' 0 0 0 0 F a a is a a a C C C � ji a1 a) CO CO (0 C .'' � a n a a a ..)',',y `0 0 "o `o `o .`'. a) aa)) aa)) aa)) aa)) ''. N 0 o • I:4; U U a3 o • c-- m m m m a 1 2':;rt1 xu■7 m m m m C D C c) 0 Ty @wd w "0 o C >. aa) •m � . o m a) v c v cL.. r r,r7, m ,Tiro CU a Q O O O a .E � � � o '3 m .c w w a 'oo 'v m a �° o {;?.,,, a Ua a Ooom8- 2do La o oac "at= � = �° ma� aN Eo- O0) • - ac � owc U) c - > c - )0 r E p a m c .- a) E E ,2• ax) o E v o o c a) - E 7 2 a) >. a a• `) aa"� 0 .°- a) 0 � '5 = c2 -= a" co -0 � w o no w a': cu mas> nE n° 0 -co_, o)w co mU 0)•L o 8 = m og` -Oc 2ccod 'a .�',;3 > o N .O to O c N E a 3 d n w a a' o a) m -o -0--2 - ,_o a� E E r �° � E r a) .4 ° - E o o c E a� a O E w c a m O c o - a c o u o a 2 > O o .c 2 ` .4, - 503 a) - . � E .2 a-°io3 'Eo@ oac CO 000a w w o _ was E o % ? QE: av Cw TO (1) E - ai 0- Ea) 22O `o OONCU :F1 O)� c E O - - to nato o .c c .S c c a, a E E a E ` a -z o E o ,j E ° '� ° cm c .zao .SUE .40m 'm- mmmm � YV oa 0 � a) (13 d, mE � �- ma m -Ow `mmca = oEm .., :o NO E o ._E 2-- o i, Mrs N .N a) c a C .0 0 a, .Eh W a) .O L.. N. c, E Cc) -50 = C t Si 15 _ "" c2 CD a _ a1; O m a O ') .0. O` C E' N a) W a) c m c 2 O L .J U > .N O n a) a) t m C n U 0 C w Q) C @ , OU a N O7 ` .O a) ` 0 3 O) a I) C O C ;TOT. C O N a) 8 o a 72 o a. a a -O a C C o = '� 0, U .O O a5 O ' a, '..{COI: N .-E m = O O C O a L a ;IH O IH O N • ,pj ed � '` .X C N a > j En C E,o.; o a ;2• a) a) o o f6 O) a) > c o w E m a) .E ` � L c 'o W U E .>.“ O L at 0) L Co O C O '0 c a a) 0) C c U L.. `O .L-' O N j N a) L a) a• N 'S a. a5i :4ao � Q5ao 'orn° `o2 < Ewo3 OCO5 . ODoa 1- -° 2CE 4-41 ' it ;,,,es iita ci.... t.c,,,, ...:!...),1 e:: r�yy V V V 71,-,4 O N N N e.:e N r.!?f , t ::1::: •0 0 0 ;. ..h f a c c c ";; o 0 m m m e ?, 3 m.. . a a a y ,, 0 0 "o yrw a) cma 3 3 3 jarz � m MC a) a) a) pn ;h, C t c U N N N �1i t,)!!. c. d.c a K CC a I���ka� 0 d '=o m 9 N 'v._.. w 4);.-,4 O U U U a O•6 00 m ,_ t„to ..:„....: ...iyi „,„„. .„.k j :14ii :pl, 0 0 0 ,1A(4 Q m co m )11:-.1 d y,!>5 O m a) — a) O 'O N T T"' C A m m C a) O O N N U) O O.'c0 y N a V y u N C Pk).. w E@ N 7 a) U) N N '-f N a , a C a) m a) c U O) C a ` C O �` 'O U O c N 0- . c :,a1 ^Y m = = d = 0 = o ° a c w � m m a � E 5 E o a O y r 0 O co to..X, a W I- v 3 > -o L C N o N a ° a C 0 = ` N m g, a= m (n u) N �•t. C > C c ° a > o m m � °) a� m ., cO O ow m - : '.e!" c o aa) aoo -oc L Ea) xa) a) o)Z a) ,� .. :p0o . 0 a) y 6 am) � �ff N Lm' n� m� Ez ! aC > CZa E = `0E aa)) g a m c 0_ n a c m � m E m y a.c c m '� C o = a«) a) ? o a) h a w E. °i o m 0 'a = m m C c - � m a m O L c C > C C -C I.- c E_D a) 1q 41 T m C a) rz c = '. � r v ° o � a; � 'm°_ w - m ° o EE :ooLme ., m :� m00 — E 'NOO O N c0 • a N > m W - . m e a' m Cl U C >. N W d a) Yy:*R E a) ,'Cm — C L .S o 'm rnEr .B � C C mo E c°) v E m o = Ua ° s m 'fill ° a ° o E .°_ NEa � � °cyo ScZa� m om � ° mm a) va` m H` co 0 2 0) C m m 0 4 C O 0 N E E U -j N O w C C u2 N d (a a) U O C a) m m 0 a) u ?.1C l m m c c 10 m a) m N ,. U N O Qc � C d E ao m E -aa C � a) a.c � a oo E ° m E o E 4) N °: U ° a ° m '0m O ° oUE — ma) Eo ° co ° E ° c = a mm Cm c o aao CCLEOCm NL O o /MI' LC ° V =o co— w m N N , V o • mc a) . m `m E m .w o � ° a oo e m o)= c .o 0 c = :ccc;,: o '� c 'a3 -a) o — mEm _ o �ainom 3 � ° mom 2 m _o m ` �;_).; ` ... a) o � O N E = y E a) E '� .o o N .0 C Z U 2c)-€. 002 ..-U C 0 a C V C AU) to a - L o) C C f U) 0 C '� O V! p m O : a) C w a) a) _ = a) m y N O 0 r a._ . m = O 0=O% . C° 2) L :c_ _1 o _a m E a a` v) 0 -o nc dm30Uao1mU Z;> dow0mE l7-R0- • • a a v a a ¢ a C C C C O O O O U to U U C o).` o) 2 o 2 o) 3 N C C -•••• C 1) C. c c D O D O D o D U N • U U 0 U O 0 m __ m m D a a CU« T N « -0 C Y a) @ a) .0 > . > a) fu/) a) LO. 0 CO O 1- 0- co C a) N c a) `p .o O _ a) 2 - - 0000 .5 U N pL, 'L al .D a7 N >, aa)i U 3 a cow y 3 co co D C 2 c Y m O N °. a a) a x n E m .E o 3 a) d L d > C 0 n a ° m -1-•• a) 3 c wCpp > " UU a) L .o ° 3ca °c ° o c .0 = o m a,C m � .o -0a '° — m 0 a , .x — m c c o U o c E a) a) D -= 13 0 a) a) 0 ca L E O C to ` 7 aa)) a) X -0 u)• 0 o (00 - 0 •- -°- C O cn o) U E ° c = - O ° C 0 -0 -o a) N m T,,_ E a v a -0 . v aa) _ aa)) w 3 L a a E p > t c L E u a> -0 mw cm 's a .a 0i a u) d ° ° .a� m w 3 d D N _ U '.2m N 0 co L > .5 f0 0) L Y E =CU +�-' Q) nF -0 ° - > > a) _o co > w a) _ O. O "I" .... O C C a) CO C D_ C O « N C a) 0- 3 C') T� .T _ C N I- L ocEou � � O0 00 ow- c � ° —'' ° NCO '') y C N C ca f0 '0 W p co C U .Ur a 0 (a C N C o C �CO =O p •N OI 0) OI-0 N 0) 0 0 � oI C o _ ` 0 « L co r O - - L N CZ c ° O .0 om .-' 0 . in m .5 N 010 -0 0 E 0 .. co E >: ca : — ocJ QC - cv a c > -o E a) a) E >; 02) ? L o0 m 0. o U O O « - a) « . o a) N L a O O U a) �` °) N w o ; >.'a) aa)) c c co co a 0 CD as T c 'o E= a u�i a 0 L 0 (0 c o � u) 7 C ° aE B -0r = � CD L. L a a ca '-' = a) C C C•• U w L ✓) > U O co-C N .'_T' u! O N 0 O « CO O N N ` o m— ` -0 > a) a) .00_ w -0g -oy -o o_ T oo) 3E ucm (n '0 C N o m CO Q d j l4 � (0 N (0 ° _ C CO 0) p E ` 07 2 c ? 0 0 C C U a) u) -0 N N L m CCC C >>, co j N O "C "0 (01- E a C 0 — = -0 c c 0 c C c 0 (3 a) L C 0 a) L C t co C N (0 O U co C C a 0 0 a)•Ut ._ c C..) in In F- cUa NN U) ... w in Q co SL cr ca o_ 0 « co A--q'3 Co C LL ` 0 � ® . • \ ) ) \ - a a. _ 272 ( 2 ; ) Ito „ { CO , , , _ _ N- - 2 } - � / \ : ta WI \ . 352 a ! a • 000 % 2 E ; o■ ) \ k / ƒ ) / / ) f : a = z « 0 § \ CO c � k � ia ± ' # la3r@ Ga8)J k2 _0=i o _ 0 a) / { j ] ( { UJf 0 _c aai : ) Z'5 2 - { \ ) ///u_ / % ilk ? e� `�Tg City of Rancho Cucamonga � w_ Fy, _.._ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Hillside Design Review DRC2008-01012 Public Review Period Closes: April 13, 2011 Project Name: Project Applicant: Andresen Architecture, Inc. Project Location(also see attached map): Located at the northwest corner of AmethystAvenue and Almond Street on a site that is encompassed by the Very Low (VL) Residential District(.1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), Flood Control (FC) District and Open Space (OS) District-APN: 1061-501-03. Project Description: Development Review Application to consider architectural and site plans for an 11,906 square foot single-family residence, an attached 1,668 square foot RV garage, a 1,359 square foot attached garage, a 2,101 square foot detached equestrian/storage/workshop building, and multiple deck/patio areas totaling 5,339 square feet on a 12.42-acre lot. FINDING • This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga,acting as the lead agency,has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted,the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. • April 13, 2011 Date of Determination Adopted By C RESOLUTION NO. 11-17 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2008-01012,A REQUEST FOR ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE REVIEW OF A 11,906 SQUARE FOOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE,AN ATTACHED 1,668 SQUARE FOOT RV GARAGE, A 1,359 SQUARE FOOT ATTACHED GARAGE, A 2,101 SQUARE FOOT DETACHED EQUESTRIAN/STORAGE/WORKSHOP BUILDING AND MULTIPLE DECK/PATIO AREAS TOTALING 5,339 SQUARE FEET ON A 12.42 ACRE LOT LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF AMETHYST AVENUE AND ALMOND STREET ON A SITE THAT IS ENCOMPASSED BY THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (.1 TO 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), FLOOD CONTROL(FC) DISTRICT AND OPEN SPACE (OS) DISTRICT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN: APN . APN: 1061-501-03. A. Recitals. 1. Andresen Architecture, Inc. has filed an application for Hillside Design Review DRC2008-01012, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On April 13, 2011, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. • 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on April 13, 2011, including written and oral staff reports,together with public testimony, the Planning Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the architectural and site plan review for a 11,906 square foot single-family residence, an attached 1,668 square foot RV garage, a 1,359 square foot attached garage, a 2,101 square foot detached equestrian/storage/workshop building and multiple deck/patio areas totaling 5,339 square feet on a 12.42 acre lot located at the northwest corner of Amethyst Avenue and Almond Street; and b. The site encompasses three zoning designations - Very Low (VL) Residential District (.1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), Flood Control (FC) District and Open Space (OS) District; and c. The site is bordered by existing single-family residences to the west and to the southwest on Gooseneck Drive; undeveloped land outside the City boundary to the north; and, San Bernardino Flood Control land to the east; and • PLANNING COMMISSIOIN RESOLUTION NO. 11-17 HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2008-01012 —ANDRESEN ARCHITECTURE, INC. April 13, 2011 Page 2 d. The proposed single-family residence is located within the Hillside Overlay District • which requires approval of a Hillside Design Review. The Planning Director may approve a.Hillside Design Review when grading is limited to cut/fill totals below 5 vertical feet and 1,500 cubic yards. Above this limitation, approval is required by the Planning Commission. In this case the project proposes up to 12 feet of cut; and e. The house is architecturally compatible with the neighborhood and conforms to the Design Guidelines outlined in the Development Code including carrying materials and architectural features to all elevations. Lot coverage will be approximately 10.5 percent of the developable portion of the lot, which is below the maximum 25 percent permitted in the Very Low(VL) Residential District. The applicant will widen Almond Street and install the required-Community Trail improvements; and f. The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee, Grading Committee, and Technical Review Committee on March 1, 2011. They recommended approval by the Planning Commission as presented; and g. The Trails Advisory Committee(TAC) reviewed the project on March 9,2011. The TAC recommended approval of the project with the following conditions: 1)that the Community Trail and public right-of-way have a maximum cross-slope grade of 4 percent or less; and 2) that the applicant will work with the Engineering Department to rework the trail entrance to the west of the existing driveway to the applicant's property. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the • above-referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, the Planning Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or the improvements in the vicinity; and • c. The application,which contemplates operation of the proposed use, complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period • and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. PLANNING COMMISSIOIN RESOLUTION NO. 11-17 HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2008-01012—ANDRESEN ARCHITECTURE, INC. April 13, 2011 Page 3 • b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone(909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and the conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 • above, the Planning Commission hereby approves the application, subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. .Planning Department: 1) Approval is for the development a 11,906 square foot single-family residence, an attached 1,668 square foot RV garage, a 1,359 square foot detached garage, a 2,101 square foot detached equestrian/storage/workshop building and multiple deck/patio areas totaling 5,339 square feet on a 12.42 acre lot located at the northwest corner of Amethyst Avenue and Almond Street APN: 1061-501-03. • 2) The Landscape Plan shall be in conformance with Landscaping Ordinance 823 and include the landscaping area between the proposed Community Trail and the curb face along Amethyst Avenue. 3) The maximum height of all retaining walls is 4 feet upslope from the house and 3 1/2 feet down slope from the house. Terraced retaining walls shall not exceed 3 feet in height,with a 3 foot separation required between walls (interior face to interior face). 4) The applicant shall install the Community Trail along Amethyst Avenue per Engineering Department Standard Drawing 1003. The trail and the . public right-of-way shall have a cross-slope grade of 4 percent or less. • The applicant shall work with the City's Engineering Department to reconstruct the existing Community Trail entrance west of the vehicle entrance to the project site in order move the current vehicle gate and �°,0 • PLANNING COMMISSIOIN RESOLUTION NO. 11-17 HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2008-01012—ANDRESEN ARCHITECTURE, INC. April 13, 2011 Page 4 equestrian step-thru location to make a smooth transition between the • two trails. 5) Print a copy of this Resolution of Approval on the plans when they are submitted for Plan Check. 6) The applicant shall obtain all the necessary permits from the Building and Safety Department. 7) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Conditions, Health Departments, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. Building Department: 1) Construction of the home must be in accordance with the approved Fire Protection Plan; this home is located in the VHFHSZ. Engineering Department: 1) Almond Street frontage improvements shall be in accordance with City "Collector Street" standards as required and including: a. Dedication shall be made, 42 total feet on Almond Street, as • measured from the street centerline. b. Install full street improvements on the north side, including curb, gutter, a.c. pavement, a parkway community trail, 5800 Lumens HPSV street lights, street trees, traffic signing and signage. . Reconstruct south half as needed to join the new centerline and • transition to existing pavement width offsite to the west, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. c. Extend existing drainage facility with headwall located outside public right-of-way. d. Provide commercial drive approach near west property line, 30 feet wide with medium broom finish concrete for the trail crossing. The drive approach shall be the commercial type, per City std. 101, Type C. The outermost edge of the drive approach (end of radius) on Almond Street shall be a minimum of 5 feet from the projection of the side property line. Reconstruct existing driveway to match. e. The Community Trail and parkway shall be per City Std. 1003, Front-On. Both the trail and parkway shall have a 2% cross fall toward Almond Street. f. Install private irrigation system for proposed street trees within the parkway. llAm l q PLANNING COMMISSIOIN RESOLUTION NO. 11-17 HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2008-01012 —ANDRESEN ARCHITECTURE, INC. April 13, 2011 Page 5 • 2) Residential construction within special flood hazard areas shall comply with the Standards of Construction outlined in the City's floodplain management regulations, Chapter 19.12 of the Municipal Code. a. Provide a Floodplain Management Report, prepared by a registered professional engineer,to substantiate full compliance with Section 19.12.050 (A) (3) (a)for review by the City Engineer. b. Applications to the Building Official shall note all the applicable Standards of Construction per Section 19.12.050(A), including in particular 19.12.050 (A) (3) (c) for the storage building. c. Compliance with these construction standards does not eliminate the requirement for the property owner to obtain flood insurance. Owner will need to apply directly to the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA) for relief from the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) designation. 3) Per the San Bernardino County Flood Control District letter dated November 17, 2010 with referenced Permit No. LON P-12010045, the developer may perform minor grading operations within the District's easement, and construct, operate and maintain a driveway and access • gate. Provide documentation that all conditions of said SBCFCD permit have been satisfied prior to building permit issuance. 4) Reciprocal access easement in favor of property to the west shall be recorded prior to the issuance of building permits. 5) The following impact fees shall be paid upon issuance of building permit (fees subject to change annually): Transportation Fee, • Beautification Fee, Park Fee, and General City Drainage Fee. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for • the project. •Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. P--1° PLANNING COMMISSIOIN RESOLUTION NO. 11-17 HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2008-01012 —ANDRESEN ARCHITECTURE, INC. April 13, 2011 Page 6 • 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in • SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local • ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM10) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers(approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel- powered equipment where feasible. • Ado PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-17 HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2008-01012 –ANDRESEN ARCHITECTURE, INC. April 13, 2011 Page 7 • 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 10) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 11) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planning programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 12) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 13) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 14) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices(i.e.fireplaces/hearths)in new development on or • after March 9, 2009. Biological Resources 1) A pre-construction survey shall be conducted by a licensed biologist to determine whether any burrowing owls or nesting birds inhabit the site prior to approval of clearing or grading permits. The applicant shall implement all recommendations outlined by the biologist in the survey. 2) All trees that do not interfere with the proposed improvements and are recommended for preservation by the Arborist Report (Chaney – December 1, 2009) shall be included in the Landscape Plan and protected in place. 3) Prior to approval of clearing or grading permits, prepare a plan that outlines the method of preservation or removal of all on-site trees. 4) Erect protective fencing 3 feet outside the drip-line of the tree canopies of the trees designation for preservation. 5) Construct a watering system under the preserved trees that will function for the duration of the construction activities. 6) Prune preserved trees to remove dead, dying, damaged or weakly attached branches. • 7) If natural mulch layer under preserved trees is missing or damaged, restore by using tree chip. 440a- PLANNING COMMISSIOIN RESOLUTION NO. 11-17 HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2008-01012 -ANDRESEN ARCHITECTURE, INC. April 13, 2011 Page 8 • 8) Monitor tree condition bi-monthly, or as recommended by arborist. 9) Read and understand the tree care industry work standards,especially ANSI A300, Part 1-2001 Pruning. • 10) Read the included document in the Arborist Report on tree risk. This will help determine the needs for the subject site, frequency, and quality of tree treatments, especially pruning. 11) Plan a long-term strategy for the maintenance, replacement and removal of the existing trees. 12) Plan an arboricultural competent treescape for the new development, complete with nursery stock standards, planting specifications, pruning for structural development, and long-term maintenance. 13) The Arborist Report recommends against using replacement tree ratios for mitigation purposes for the removed trees. The best mitigation measures are the quality long term plans outlined in the report. Any legally required tree replacement shall be incorporated in the Landscape Plan, Cultural Resources • 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the • inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with jq- 1o3 PLANNING COMMISSIOIN RESOLUTION NO. 11-17 HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2008-01012—ANDRESEN ARCHITECTURE, INC. April 13, 2011 Page 9 • • original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures(i.e., paleontological monitoring)that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate,the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor,trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository(i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer • collected specimens with a copy to the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) All recommendations outlined in the Preliminary Soil Exam (GeoMat Testing Laboratories, Inc. -October 9, 2009)and any subsequent soils exam shall be incorporated into the final Grading Plan and Structural Building Plans. 2) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. • 3) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • 4) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. �ao�{ PLANNING COMMISSIOIN RESOLUTION NO. 11-17 HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2008-0101 2 —ANDRESEN ARCHITECTURE, INC. April 13, 2011 Page 10 5)' Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall • be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. Hazards and Waste Materials 1) The project shall comply with Chapter 7A of the California Building Code(CBC),which includes building standards for the Wildand-Urban Interface Fire Area. The standards call for the use of ignition-resistant materials and design to inhibit the intrusion of flame or burning embers projected by a vegetation fire and help reduce losses resulting from repeated cycles of interface fire disasters. Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading • Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by H.P. Engineering — June 2, 2010,to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. • 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and • minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to PLANNING COMMISSIOIN RESOLUTION NO. 11-17 HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2008-01012 —ANDRESEN ARCHITECTURE, INC. April 13, 2011 Page 11 • ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the • City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent(NOI)to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. • Noise • 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 2) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 3) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. • 4) Any proposed perimeter block walls shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase. PLANNING COMMISSIOIN RESOLUTION NO. 11-17 HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2008-01012 -ANDRESEN ARCHITECTURE, INC. April 13, 2011 Page 12 5) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of • 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF APRIL 2011. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Luis Munoz, Jr., Chairman ATTEST: James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the of the City of Rancho • Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of April 2011. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • I A t COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT tr, :., t' DEPARTMENT p„( gyp+ Jae STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: DRC2008-01012 SUBJECT: HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW APPLICANT: ANDRESEN ARCHITECTURE LOCATION: APN: 1061-501-0300 - TERMINUS OF AMETHYST AVENUE AND ALMOND STREET ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements Completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its / /_ agents,officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval,or in the alternative,to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be.required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 11-17, Standard / /_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The / /_ project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Mitigated Negative Declaration -$ 2,094.00 • B. Time Limits 1. Hillside Design Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use / /_ has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. •C-12-08 1 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2008-01012 cond 4-13.doc 01 • Project No.DRC2008-01012 Completion Date C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include / /All site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping,sign program,and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions / /_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and / /_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/ /_ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all / /_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be / / located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 8. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, / / including proper illumination. 9. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/_ owner, homeowners'association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 10. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall _/ / condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter. 11. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. _/ /_ D. Grading - See Attached Conditions E. Landscaping 1. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in / /_ accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110,and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be 2 • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2008-01012 cond 4-13.doc • Project No.DRC200B-01012 • Completion Date shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods. • 2. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 _/_/_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 3. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater / /_ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq.ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 4. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously _/ /_ maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 5. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the _/ /_ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. • APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909)477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) General Requirements • • 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: / / a. Site/Plot Plan; • b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; • e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams,water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number(i.e., SUBTT#, SUBTPM#, DRC#)clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. / /_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers'Compensation coverage to / / the City prior to permit issuance. • 3 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2008-01012 cond 4-13.doc Project No.DRC2008-01012 Completion Date 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. / / G. Site Development • 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be _/ / marked with the project file number(i.e., DRC2001-00001). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential project or major addition,the applicant / /_ shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee,Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map / /_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. 4. For projects using septic tank facilities, written certification of acceptability, including all / /_ supportive information, shall be obtained'from the San Bernardino County Department of Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building permits. 5. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday / /_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. H. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building' Code (CBC) for property line clearances / / considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. / / 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. / / Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading /_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to / / perform such work, 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the / / time of application for grading plan check. --- 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, _/_/_ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 4 • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC22008-01012 cond 4-13.doc 4— I/ Project No.DRC2008-01012 Completion Date 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for _/_/ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of • combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT,(909)477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: J. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from / / street centerline): ——— • 42 total feet on Almond Street • / / • K. Street Improvements 1. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source / /_ of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. • 2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: _/_/_ Curb& A.C. Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail Other Almond Street X X X X X X 3. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights,and intersection safety lights _/_/ on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a / /_ construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing,street name signing,traffic signal conduit,and / /_ interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction / /_ project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer • 5 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2008-01012 cond 4-13.doc Project No.DRC2008-01012 Completion Date Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets,a maximum of 200 • feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City / / Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with _/_/ adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving,which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be / /_ installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan / / check. ——— 4. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in / / accordance with the City's street tree program. --- 5. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed / /_ legend. (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction • . legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet. (typically sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The Engineering Services Department reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field • conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Qty. Almond Street Gingko biloba Maidenhair Tree 5" 40' 15 Fill "Fairmount" O.C. Gal. In Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting,an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 6. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with / /_ adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. • 6 • • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2008-01012 cond 4-13.doc 4-113 • Project No.DRC200B-01012 Completion Date L. Drainage and Flood Control • 1. The project(or portions thereof)is located within a Flood Hazard Zone;therefore,flood protection /_/_ measures shall be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. 2. A permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District is required for work within its / / right-of-way. ——— M. General Requirements and Approvals 1. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all / /_ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • • 7 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2008-01012 cond 4-13.doc City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-01012 aCiss. Building &Safety Department tar 10500 Civic Center Dr. • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 T: (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 • GRADING COMMITTEE PROJECT REPORT&RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS Project No.: DRC200S-01012 Type: Custom Home for Shallan Family Location: N.W. of Amethyst Avenue &Almond Street Planning Department: TABE VAN DER ZWAAG APN: 1061-501-030-00 Meeting Date: March 1, 2011 By: Matthew Addington Acceptable for Planning Commission: Yes: xxx No: If NO, see COMMENTS below: PRELIMINARY: • GRC: March 1, 2011 By: Matthew Addington FINAL: • PC Meeting: By: • Note: Building and Safety,—Grading will review and comment on future submittals for this • project. . • A) STANDARD CONDITIONS - Standard Building and Safety - Grading and Planning Department standard conditions for Grading and Drainage Plans. • 1) Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2) A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3) A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. The geologic report shall include a study showing the depth of the ground water over the area of the site proposed for development and shall include recommendations regarding a private sewage disposal system. 4) The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5) A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. • 1:1BUILDING'PERMITSDRC2008-01012 Shallan1DRC2008-01012 Grading Committee Project Reportln,20110301.doc 1 of 6 City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC200B-01012 ,( Building&Safety Department ti Civic Ra choCucam Cucamonga, 91730 3 T: (909)477.2710 F: (909)477-2711 • 6) The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 7) If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8) A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 9) It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 10) It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage acceptance letter(s) from adjacent downstream property owner(s) or discharge flows • in a natural condition (concentrated flows are not accepted) and shall provide the Building and Safety Official a drainage study showing the proposed flows do not exceed the existing flows prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 11) It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the • adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 12) The Grading and Drainage Plan shall Implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 13) All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 14) Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 15) The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond the proposed construction limits. 16) The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. • Note: this project exceeds 5,000 cu yds of earth moving. 17) The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". • I:IBUILDINGIPERMITS10RC2008-01012 Shallan\DRC2008-01012 Grading Committee Project Report#1,201103D1.doc 2of6 U0 City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-01012 Building &Safety Department 10500 Civic Center Dr. • Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 a 7: (809)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 18) Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: • • i) The bottom of the over-excavation •.• • li) ..Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance •of the building • • • • iii) : At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety • • Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 19) Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. 20) The applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Official prior to issuance of the grading permit for any underground,water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMPs) which may be proposed in the final Water Quality Management Plan. B) COMMENTS - The following items shall be corrected / completed, submitted to, reviewed and approved by staff prior to scheduling the project for a Planning Commission hearing. Copies of required easement/right-of-way documents, including legal descriptions, shall be submitted for review prior to obtaining final signatures. The review period for the above will generally be a minimum of two weeks or longer depending upon the adequacy and • complexity of the submittal: I:IBUILDINGIPERMITSIDRC200S-01012 Shallan\DRC200B-01012 Grading Committee Project Reporttl,20110301.doc 3 of 6 4-/la City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC200B-01012 Building &Safety Department S 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 • Z M T: (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 1) Please note that the previous technical review comments were not addressed for this review by the technical committees. Those comments have been addressed as special conditions of approval in Section C below. C) SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1) Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent. Prior to issuance of a grading permit drainage study shall be submitted to the Building Official for review which shall include a hydrology study for the proposed construction and shall include hydraulic calculations for all drainage devices, including but not limited to, pipes, channels, catch basins, inlets and outlets. 2) Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to 'constructing • walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent . property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property.. . 3) ,: :Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall provide to Building and • Safety Services Director a copy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan for review prior to recordation of the document. The Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be recorded prior to issuance of a grading permit. • 4) Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 5) This project exceeds 5,000 cubic yards earth material to be moved..Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall provide a grading bond. 6) This project is proposing a net import of earthwork material.Any disturbance of the subject property to balance the earthwork quantities on site shall be shown on the final grading and drainage plan(s). 7) The final /precise grading and drainage plan shall be drawn at a scale of not smaller than 1" = 20'. All details and cross sections shall be drawn to scale. B) Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall submit to the Building and Safety Official domestic private water plans for review and permit and a private sewage disposal system plan for review and shall be ready to be permitted. 9) Prior to issuance of the grading permit the applicant shall submit to the Building and • Safety Services Director a ground water study showing the depth of the ground water across the project site along with recommendations for a private sewage disposal (septic) system plan. 10) If a private sewage disposal system can not be engineered to meet the requirements of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, the San Bernardino County Department of Environmental Health Services and the California Plumbing Code, a • 1:1BUILDINGIPERMITS\DRC200B-01012 Sha11an1DRC2008-01012 Grading Cammlttee Project Report#1,20110301.doc 4of6 / �tj 0 City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-01012 Building 8 Safety Department 10500 Civic Center Dr. • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 T: (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 sewer main shall be constructed from the project site and connected to a public sewer system. The sewer plans shall be approved by the Cucamonga Valley Water District prior to issuance of a grading permit. 11) The Water Quality Management Plan shall include a copy of the project landscaping plan(s). 12) Prior to issuance of a grading permit and a private sewage disposal permit the applicant shall process an application and plans to relocate the existing 12-inch waterline away from the proposed septic tank/private sewage disposal system with the utility company which operates said 12-inch waterline. 13) The final grading and drainage plans shall include all the sections shown on the conceptual grading plans sheet A-13 (Site Sections) and sheets A-14 and A-15 (Building Envelope Sections). • • 14)_.The. final grading and drainage plans. shall include the conceptual. grading plan. • sheets AC1 and AC2 (Exhibit Map for US-Army.Corps,of Engineers). 15) The final grading anddrairiage plans shall include the conceptual grading plan sheet . A-10 (Topo & Slope Analysis). • . • 16) The final grading and drainage plans shall include an exhibit showing ALL easements properly plotted on a screened overlay precise grading and drainage plan. 17) Prior to issuance of a grading permit all non-building wall plan(s) shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department for review and shall be ready to be permitted. D) WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN 1) An updated Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) was not submitted with this package to the Building Official for review. The WQMP will need to be completed prior to issuance of a grading permit. 2) A WDID number must be provided prior to final approval of the WQMP and issuance of the grading permit. 3) The Water Quality Management Plan previously prepared by HP Engineering Inc. dated June 2, 2010 has been reviewed and deemed °Incomplete" dated August 3, 2010. An updated report was not submitted for review, therefore the same report has been deemed "Incomplete" dated January 11, 2011. The following corrections are • required prior to the final approval of the WQMP: I:IBUILDINGIPERMITSIDRC200 8-01012 Shallan\DRC200&01012 Grading Committee Projed Report/PI,20110301.doc 5of6 City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008.01012 Building &Safety Department lrtjr 10900 Civic Center Dr. ir�i���j/ Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 • e T: (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 Page Section Item _ A-5 1.2 Please add a bullet point for the WDID number and PMT number to be completed when the numbers are available. A-6 2.1 In the Pollutant of Concern Summary Table" please include under "Other— Specify Pollutants" suspended solids for Mill Creek.. A-7 2.2 In the Table, item 1.A should be marked "No", and item 1.B should • be marked "Yes". A volume based BMP will be required for this project. • A-18 3.2 Please provide a copy of the educational materials in this WQMP document. A-21 3.3 Please complete Table 3-3 and indicate which BMP('s) are proposed. A-22 3.4 A volume based BMP is required. A-22 3.4.1 Attachment D is missing A-22 3.4.2 Attachment D is missing A-23 4.1.1 . This section is incomplete. Please include a schedule for maintenance. • .6 Please replace the Certification with the City of Rancho•Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan". A copy of the agreement may be picked up at the Building and Safety front counter. A-1 The City of Rancho Cucamonga does not use Attachment A-1. Please remove this attachment. • A-2 The City of Rancho Cucamonga does not use Attachment A-2. Please remove this attachment. Please provide a full size (24" x 36")WQMP BMP exhibit within the document. In addition, the reduced BMP exhibit (Exhibit B) was missing from the document. Please provide a full size (24" x 36") conceptual landscape exhibit within the document. • 1:1aUILDINGIPERMITSIDRC2008-o1012 Sha0an1DRC2008-01012 Grading Committee Project Reportlll,20110301.doc 6 of 6 • r,,'0 A, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District g • Fire Construction Services FIRE STANDARD CONDITIONS January 27, 2011 Shallan Residence 9406 Almond DRC2008-01012 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. ,FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply . • - _ 1. r Design guidelines for Fire'Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location . of fire hydrants: a. For single-family residential projects in the designated Hazardous Fire Area,'the fire hydrant design & installation shall be in accordance to RCFPD Policies & Standards. • f If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building,-additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. g. Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof. FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The required fire flow for this project will be determined in gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix B, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. The Fire flow has been established in the approved FPP 2. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 3. Fire service plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until fire service plans are approved. 4. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site. FCS-3 Fire Access Roadways Public and private roads shall be improved as approved by the fire district in the Fire Protection plan before an occupancy release can be granted by the Fire District. •C-4 Requirement for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 50, the 2010 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to he installed in Buildings of with an R fire area. /-4.21 FSC-7 Hazardous Fire Area This project is located within the "State Responsibility Area" (SRA), the "Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone" (VHFHSZ), City of Rancho Cucamonga "Hillside District", and/or within the area identified on the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, Exhibit V-7 as High Probability-High Consequence for Fire Risk. These • locations have been determined to be within the "Hazardous Fire Area" as defined by the Fire District. The Hazardous Fire Area is based on maps produced by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. Hazard Reduction Plans: The applicant shall prepare the architectural plans for the construction of the buildings in accordance with the County of San Bernardino's Development Code as amended by RCFPD Ordinance FD50; The Ordinance requires construction plans in accordance with the requirements of the approved Fire Protection Plan. The FPP addresses the following: a. Fire protection water supply b. Fire resistive non combustible roof assemblies c. Fuel Modification by vegetation management d. Fire District access roadways e. Ignition resistive construction and protection of openings f. Fire sprinkler systems g. Fire flow criteria h. For construction requirements in the "Hazard Fire Area" refer to the 2007 CBC Chapter 7A RCFPD Ordinance FD50, standards and policies. 2.. Mobile, stationary or portable power-operated equipment in the Hazardous Fire Area shall not be used without the Fire Safety Division's written approval. Specific fire protection measures that may be required to mitigate the hazard include, but are not limited to: a. A stand-by water tender, equipped with a pump, fire hose and nozzle. • b. Pre-wetting of the site to avoid the production of sparks between blades or tracks and rocks. c. Conducting a fire watch for a minimum of one-hour following the cessation of operations each day. d. For welding, cutting or grinding work, clear away all combustible material from the area around such operation for a minimum distance of 10-feet. A "hot-work" permit must he obtained from Fire Construction Services prior to cutting, welding or grinding work. e. Maintain one serviceable round point shovel with an overall length of not less than forty-six (46) inches and one five (5) gallon backpack water pump-type fire extinguisher fully equipped and ready for use at the immediate area during the operation. • FSC-8 Chronological summary of RCFPD Hazardous Fire Area requirements Prior to the issuance of a building permit the applicant shall record the approved Fire Protection plan with the county's recorded office. Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the property must be inspected and accepted by the Fire District staff. Schedule the inspection with Fire Construction Services at 909-477-2713. .Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions . PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION — Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering• Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. /4-7c)D7- 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to • perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Ppor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 4. Fire sprinkler monitoring must be installed tested and final by FCS. 5. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CCRR's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 6. Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street. When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. • 7. The fire protection Plan: The approved plans shall be-recorded with the county recorder's office 8. Vegetation Management: The landscaping shall be installed and/or.modified in accordance with approved . FPP. _ . . 9. All requirements of the FPP must be completed before an occupancy release may be granted • • • 3 b-/a3 mr', 0 Q .CU 0 J I� 2 }, r4 r CD O L 0 fiN ° 'n i U = ° rl _ U o o E o p co U CU Z x a, H w ° o C) N N L ! 73y r CC rl > /^s), W ••• • '!1 r = /�� 10 < W Z C ry • 4 ` LL w IL a� � a { ° +) rc� , f6 I 4AQ j m N ci �'P p ° c U ' ( . w ? Z 4-1 > L_ = k Q D cu Q ro 0 F p[ O N CU a (0 t w DC ° ° 1• vY4 J V au i U J v 00 _ ° I F ca L x, . a CC Q ° f t 2 I +aa 4J 0 � 2. i , O V! CO ' ' p v -a ° C cn = L L 1 __i O Q ° i— u • !■-:.;7.-.4..,-Aa, ,, ,_. , 61c4. •,,: .,,,4,, . , • .,•- Av plec v "1";,. 4• , 1 „ .; aops - AT-6ftofifehibarcf Ave "• -.,-,3-.,. ":,,,,..,,.. .. -,, - ' ..' . to --. • r- • '.3, . -tt . , . -• .' ') V - +• .• .31. , ':-.." • ° .,,,' ',. , .0904ori: . .__,.....-'xitP : .,„ 1 • #I ' 4 ' • ..... V.' 0 9., ...J' ',•„"Viliii+ .a .. ,,- s •d'1;,7■:..--,- :.-.:'`a.,-(,:f.'": . -, -...'-',.' ., , . ,:7;,„. 440 ,....,, -',Pl'.•'t',.'-,-,'.`'-,`'.''-,-p'11,i, r 4 . + .41.. •• : ,t I:2:,i:.;,',',',,.„.,_■.,±-:o.:.4 i L P 1 •,...r3L-,1t•;!o..,•4,ui1A rsn t-',, ',1 eh.:?'1..1'.•.."".3t7..IL,.)._-. 4 ' , t. A,...;; '. / ''41 , .i, tr. I: •••• . i ■ ..,...,- •,r,i'V., f, . '• 'I t 1 t114',-.‘ . '''';''. ...:'+'t •, ' l itr, if,!••••• -94 ••' tr.. . .,,:: r-v- i,,,, .j. IdleJF43 g, -e - r' 4 ' ''':2.,• '. 1.. '..1,114. r.•, • ..:.::',7t'. '•''''''... iii 0 Wie eilk.S: ',. ir.. ' . .,■ ', ..r' . '..:., ' 7.4 '7 Ck.' 1.'. ' ' t'0A •-cu....- • I .4 - ,'t1 I g an:. e.'a•.'1 ''. ,'.. .• .-41ti i'.. -:-.i _' .''' At• 'GO t; -.-,::.01101,,...., air 1 I7v,I'I, '-4 -• ' f.:"4 -..i43 Q.', ",-, , ' -. i. , , -:.,;•, ,...,,,, :k... A. , .,, ... ';'i.., :';''• '''' .,•'7,-....,--..,,-:-.rt--. „vx , ,.,,„,-I 9...„‘..):.^ .,,,,,P.,...,,,,,,,,. , -,. ,,,,L., , :•,.., , , ,1,.. 7., • ki.... ,,,.,. '•,:..,,,,,p,,,, ,_,r r,A,„.4„..,-.... •,..., „r: •,, .. ,,,-,-, ,..„ .....,,„., -N,, , .0..%144 ;. I 1. .1 ' .:.'...,:' ■ IN., ...., ,-- .7., • himoi,. 41 t.: . '1 tlerlit:1711/4164.... . , 0 : --: II, -'-,...1"'..,--, '-' ' • t . '-% . .1 itle 4,,,,, . • .-..•,, ..,,,,,. . .; ; , , ,.„ ..,..,73 .L. 4.1 :-..„.jky:, ,, :,., . , • ....,-, .,,,u, -.,,I.:.... , 1 ., ..,-i • ; . ' 11:4.03.,...-.:12 'i• .'"•' "...i8 - ,'■• :'..a r,T1'. ' ''',:a -,, .,..: .:,,,.. . , . ':i. ....-.. i I,- ... 3/4 elf '',4r..'' * :,.,-,-.. 4,1 ..i, • , ,,, .--..z --, 0 ,. ';',--. , - t ', r•••:. L •' § j• , - 4, -?, 1 e3.iiirii. 1 .`-7,:',,,'",,'-', -.4-4- ''''';` ai• ' iii`Ilk";,,'.;,..:',''.', 1) 1 1 '','-! ' ",, ,- ' • ., 1 ' .',.,4,- '..4.q. . ,: 6 !:;1' • - ''':4':' . :_11P•••,-• ,.'-•‘-. •--fr'■ .)4-,' "... • CI '.-..1 I .. ittk ,V ' ' 'Ti"!'e: ,.- ..:, :,;,i3,;,':',.•.. . '-'' • , '. ..10-'.'--„"- ,*. Jr, '''-4-1*.3.. . -. .,*-.,..:: '„.•;'.Cy "3 .,'3,4.i.kl ' :„...:„-,..„;,,..-,,-,:, „. , - • ...-„,,,,L)--Ty- ',hp., ‘ ', -„' '' , -......,-- .Lt,'",:k , :t...7r, .. ,,,.....,,,_ GAV.■11401rUIV:14,,,,Im„..6.. . ,411w. „.,-I': . t ,; ,..."1 , • ..- 're-• I':,.. olt;IIII , ,, _... , . , _ - -•,,,, ; ; I''',.. ';.1?# t; . '''',:.--;;-,-7,---:;, -"' , .,. h,..:.%. . , \- -, a.1",,,.• -.,44.:..•,g • • . •. • ,,;-- • .11',.4 '.-• . 2' ' ''' 6. ..%. . ..:d ...! . "15 •1 ; '.I (0 i • ,.t.fro.'.., ' . . ' - . ... '''..1' et ,.-., • . tr. , ,,,..!..,,,,,..,;te: : , ,:h . ,rv, :....,, itt: „„,, h.z„,.);. ...,_,,,,,,,.„...,,,., ..,•..,..'4. ..-....,. .,.7. :..,.. ....,.. .z.. , .!.-...4, :4,'''r...,- 4....,,,,o,•c-..1ziot,,,H.:1,.:;!:7.,,qt.biel : •',•;'. ,•:.••.:,- ' rit•-•-•'.~.,,,i, ..1 . '• 1•• ,;••:.„, . . A ,. . 1 ., i, L t '' ' 1: ' -g.'*-":1--- '• -. 1 . ',711111 ".• W, . . f ;;. .5.--1 ;1.V. 1,104r7,, ,: , '--•7 ; ;',, I 0 ' t' :., -I; .;?t,•; , _ .. - :I .7•';'''',.0-,• 31:4'4 "1 - 1. - . . : . , . ., ..:c...:,,....,,,, . ,,,y,,,,, , . ... .. .,, 1,,#* , ' ,r, .,...,, ... ...• ... , ,,, - . . -.::....:,: ,.. . , ,'i.:4...;;F...-.....i .,,,,:.--. . -• .2. , ,,,,.._, ,. ..., ,..„ .-, -:,,. -., _ - ,.. . ... . ,,.., , ...., ,..„ - ........., . .'4, I 1 '_-: 1. - • - -• 1:-."1;43444.•..';..4'-, ',' • , , . ', 1,-.L,.•3 Ii;I'',,,;-",..:,-....., ,,;,,,p,• 1,4:4";;It,404;;„ . ' 11.40i-airitn,741) ' ■ ' - • ,::- , ,Ild;- *- .. - •'`, !; t, , ,..... i.,f, • , ,. 2, , 4,1euealr'... ,•,•• • ,, . '43... .,, • -- -eAv.allippqtutr3, ,- e3 • Ii; I II *...4 -r :-...-: -,,e,'" . ... ot'111' . i ..,,,,' • Ir.r Rapt - • ',..e!- tf-,''.el 1,4,,' 3 I, _i : ..!,-1- 1. - 1 .,,, __.,. , ,‹ . 1./r,pUl_r_LICC:,.: ,.; -4- -1:,- -p- ... ,.., - c, - i„41,..,,.. : c;■23. .,,,fi ,t•7,71,,F- .., c,,q50 . 1 3 k, . :,,.... ' -0 6. ' .4 0.,'-',., - - co,....,,..;:- L •,,' 5 '-:4„, :1.,,,I,-,Iii.jt ...-. " ;;'"-•' - ' 4 it ,:,,i .,..,.,.IF , _; 4 ,,,,, „ .• -,,,,, ,-' . ,. , .4 • ,•()c,c,, f. 4.04* - •:-;- -,. '.!. • i: a ' 1. ' ',1-,. nv, int:Nig , ;''.' ,I I !,0 I •,--''' • 'ii,.;.I - I , . • ,;-.:, -,,,-? :;,,,, , ',: . . ,v) .. "-; . : , ' ,c`. .; 009,, ' - • r)."'j ' ' +.". ' • • , I I ,. ■1 '''' -•• iburn-i,,.:•,., i Ii TS-Od ••••' • r V..., ', . ;51.rPi ' r 1.'.f.',.! ';/,•,. .: '. t'' ''''•.4, • . ..... I ' ,V...1.': ', " • '''''61, , ' ,,.._', . 1.....111*,.•:',' -",,-•-. n .24116,.••■.:M0-3. '1.7'W,r',!,Pipe . .■ , ...... a A.+'USCIL.WaH''' ' '.--,r- :- - ,•••-• -t.ip ._ •• ,,, • gl ' ' -1 414 ' ''in' ' '5. • ''' -..i 41 .• . ''' • • 1 , • .. 4 0 4 ' - '* .. " 414, .,_ i• •,, . 1 ‘ 414.1p. ■ T ' •JOSEUI.UOIN i 44pretio, d,„_„4„1.-1,,,_ . . 4,,,,,,, , - - .;.,,,. 1. ... -,4-4,L' • ' , ■•,- - 4t..1 '474i 11 , 1 ... Attie. . ,_. ,. 1, , ..91.."""' . --+ '4„_„,n .•411sp _, ',,144.,, 1, I, ... L . • . , ' . 3i* . ,,,, .. -':,,I, '8, mi ', t .,,,'.1 ;-.," ' ' ,. . ! '• .. ' I ' ., - 1,.,..'E-ac. , -, 839i%,iI ' , -,-,1 • ..- ,; , I, 11,5,.• t . .,• 4,', 1 At,,,,,...;.. , c. .7.- ,.,- ,,,,,,-,&...,...,..... ,146.4.-- -;5Ickc,' , ' 6 •.....4i..-,..,,,',...,,,: -:::-' .,... , , , n , _...... .;1.... ....,7.pc,.,.....,_,ssac , , c.....40,,,..(i i , . ,,N, 7 I f, rgli 10 1 t ..1•„t*,,,,,,,„.i,:;;.'.1;10 ... . . I ', • .72::- (:),,,*,..'S',40. . ,' 1'-. , . ,V., : .t t,-. ' 6' 4 • • IiI I wr' : 74.- -4.1!.• -' . ' ir. a... ' 4 , 4).;••.,-*.. .4 ' ,,,,,,..,,Old eteeR115022'3'.'.., 74!:.3-,:,,.- •••":341.• 1 ., „.,x3r.. .?'' , 4-. ' ft'1 '& . ..., .' „., (...) ,. ..,. rui. • ,, r• ,. .' '4:7. 4 r......-tc-1-;,........,- . .. • ..P. :144* .*, - 4,,,,---,., ,,, : . i4,. ...,,•.• -- -cr v,tk .1/4.4-,,,,•: .• A :.,t:, . i 1 . , c -. - - •. .,... .. w ,4. ,, p . , '?;.' - ' '- >!-.` ; • ,. ... L.: . .ii f', '. ..P.4" :1 •, _....i , - ......,• 7'.1 -, •J :,..alr , ■,. ..;; \,°,)ir:e) ' • . • • • 1 . ... � 3 -0 c'2 414 ,;‘,1404441*. ......: -f r-i- o_ D 0 1 . r i . te+ (r+) 0 r) M ,?:, ‘, ',:k,.... . r t' i' Q O CU ..t.,. f ' , ' • ' -% * 0_ eL 0 . . mumemei . :; ►.. � rD : :ef' p �, - 1 r+ (n * ' . 41,41•4:2.:, ' ? , ', ' D * Q r ', r f" . ; ,. 0 ' , $) -.. V i. t. -,f , 1 � .,. a) 3 . . � a • , , � 0 < , � , 0 C r ...", C e, •., ; C 1 .' K t c • 1 3 • • ,o Mi r p :, ` � x fp, . �, S • 4•■ �i.c r ..BAR.. `��• 1 Yam T .-• ' t j w �. WPM ,' a •r Y,1Y, .413, 'f R ey µ ._ , • 4. ■f, . , . - ,......_,..„:.• i iltitioi 1-�r i . t ps y, 4 L,, '4','SA'41''''.f- tlt. ' -.1.7 1‹-if - . ,,,,,,,, .., „.,,, . . . .. ..„..... •• • ... • . ...:, ., y I :,a Y iT I,i:. is 0 r4 17` t , r. ..• '. * .• 4 . 401 Wri.. ''.' p.f , . , ilil „.. 9 z ;. *_� •mel'Ill".." . . :. . , ' , ,• ', • ,,•:_,..!•_:,..„ ..,-.„ . .... - ....:7,.......,,,r. .,. NMI f/MBROM, -:■•3 r) ..,„,...,„„....r.I......:... .I•111•1111111111110: ' ..nowillINIONIer., Cils • :f°F".ree , „ 1 , 1-i, - .4'S' • °''.. ' 1 • : 4'.•) ••■ : •0 i -I" ht ..-“, k. e.•i• , , . 4 .:,:tfi473::.;;;:'.'.1.14::: M Iv IMMIIIS CD = r--p. . ..,,.... .. .... • ti,f :1 , ••••• • , t ,t,,, ,•,, ,.. , . . • ,, , i . .-pti•-•• a) A 4. . I . • • . i• .. . . . . ..- _ , • • -- -.• i -Li; `IFV• • . ,. . • • '` "''•I''''',"' .4' . '..,... ,4.1.,,m , • . .. 0,,.... 1' • ) ' '.. ... ..‘:4-,A, ;4'1.,c-k 1 .",' '::e-i-• ..:,.,;.:.4 . , I ---e-, .1•>;!,:. ‘1-s ..-...".--;:,t,....,..., • ".--- "'... -,--'r-,--, r- • ----.1 1- -,, ;..6-F,-",* ,',:,..; ',.., •-;!..1 --- --,• . • . .-. ! - , - .,, . 4 ,.:. .••••'" - . Tt , =.,50 ,-t-',W,, -, .,. rel,. t -:■1: . ' , •• - ".' I ' ‘. 7 •, , . . ...,..._ .. --...: il t„ ,.., • . .. •• . , ... .. 4" .,, ,,,**,,.. , MOM -' ' . 4'45 . .., • -rk 41: "‘ ".- -..• . a imi•111, .,. NOR 1 ' , _ ,IrA•s•''',,, , L:11.A1,,,:. , .1-17.4 — 1...` — 7'-.,.''' 11, -- 'W- '''::- r•' .,,,i,,4 ..., ,4 '4, 44_, • mll, 7:. ll,k1, ■ ,___. • ./ ,., ' - -, .;,C.Ik' ':q crk •,•■,1. ' ,., •,....' :a 4.. ... .., tt, , . ..412•, •i•."- • . Snarl 1 ,q '' C;.'i;•• i ... . . ' .',..1 PIA( 71111:40` •..., , - ,...1 '.,,cW4 0 i.":/. I,.• 1,111, Air --... .. -.....,1 ye", .... •,... • 4 . ,,,: , ,, ..,......: ,,,,:!...... ....... ,..... e - 1. el'A'• I. ..".iiii 4 7.7..... .; ..... • & - • , 4 , - e ' • - . t. ,. lit, .... .. •.„. , . i . /( ,. .., i , .._.... . f 7' r . pie'„; -*, , ., • '''' '-...: ,-;',°' ,e4, +..' '• : 1 ' . ° -'i).4 ,7A/ ' ,:i, ,, 4 , i, t..; ., • 2,-. , , ' - ,. ,. (ye, 24r .,,,, ,, . ,,_ ,...,:.i _.... .,,,-;,. war, A i (•`'. . A A A. . A s Z A! 'ir 0 1.,11.' ':-.fr4 .••••:, ' ..--• '. A'' ) .t. • O'' • .,''' ... n 1...44.*... ., " ..... 0 ' I * r • . , • gr. ' 0 • : -• > ....-_ . . 4-7,10t,„4 1 . . \ ---- I I I(5...), I I (Iip —. (7:4) I • /(:)4 : Oh I H i I . : AI , ■ ■ i .._.- •- 1 3 1 4 1 : '-'1:14.1■ z =I; a , I Iv 60 sf:i _ • .1 ./ • pr r• . W 1 .1---.,• — = NE . _ , 1 T EMI - i I 1 i-l'm i ! 2.1 i. Ill 'i' ' t t . . I ,,.. a • . .... ...,45 ____ , „‘„......:: --. P > !,_ ._ ..._---_ - NI ■'____...-rmkr.,14 1 ‘...1 glIMMENEMMOK1M1411;'.1.11 1 lie I -yaw-irl' . _ . 4-- 1 '•.--4- -Is------- ) :4 j i II • -----,in- 77/-: MI .hp UM a I—■•••■■-••••• - .. 1 !I ... ° 4:1:), .. ii ii lid P . ii I , •, -1 „ r., •<.: -I ::....t. 1 . II ■ MI f-' . t. r 1 tNt../■......-- 1 Al 1 11•/I 1 • ft- .:. ”. , -- 1 ml '' /• i • I _• • v,- ..f;: :i.....:t h ti - .. - 140.4.::.•:: : 17, r . . i ° •I -- TIT _ ill I .w -14f-aux v 11 1° ...-...... .- la .. iiiii-115.,..:,..•,,,,,...iii. „::::,;.... ; '3 4 ■= - --- . 1 -, , .1/‘ , , ?..• --- 1 • . ! i " ., F. ....t.: --1. I 1 I.. .. . 1m i ... -------- -—' ". ,' 1:1 . p *:::t:: I: Lt, ' ..\''' :‘,:::;:;:.' 14 i . p -- ....r. in i dl . ,..• .;:k,',.... -- s .......,... N-' 1. . ...:: . • • Alk:' 4.7'.if•V• 0".••.•:%,.....',A1...- = Z .,1..?4,;,';,•...,:;1' 0 -li: 1.1.710 I 1 .111.•4 :441 -r, !• •• •1 .rel 1 i J., . ,,,.;•*',1t; i 11 ■ • ■I .•■ 1 11* :17.:.', •, lc (CI ". . I . ,.1'•,)#,„•.' = ° , .'■"'S I \\ Ll 0 11 fi /, ,••■;'..•A.. 7 • - ... • . . , w 1., L Hi . . ,o......,,,,,..,..:: ,%-...- ,, .. ,. ., _ —, -- - ..----iJ • .4-, . 6,„..-, ye ..., ,.... ..,/ .A\.... -. . .., cr) iiMMENNO r ‘•.. s.., :,,,n l'. ■ -1 L . .IL V .„, ,.....• vir ■ • .t J(/) _ ....:,1 . \ \v.' v.sop. .. , ... , . .,N.. :,..,:i•- - I I I c) ' IllIllk_._._... :,„ T o 0 s ' CL.. 3 _-s. E 1 . ,, 4, .,,,... ,, ''::34- ..".;.% .11 � ; � I lip 'I.:t� : '.; * ' E 1 r ,t�111 1 .. /` '� 1111 �� `� ` r3�.1 �r ` D (D R1 A401/0��'';` is:• `*!1•` i • .t.' �llio'∎1 x. t p h .4 v NO /T1 (emu +11 :, 4 1w < D X111 t app 3 3 -+, :... . , _• 3 ,,... -• 0 �D V•• n n o N D 3 ., .., o 1-1 D c, 3 .. ,,,: ..:: � - a O v)G ` ' O cc, r-r lO = O • e...r r • CD > tt .. ... . > r- rng D Cl g , . -0 2)z = c) — co -is r• -I• s �< D r cn r cn 0 C •.,.,.: ... o f o Z w n l --11. > ••y4 o I 0 L l'' b , 'iUn d t O m;�k 0 CD cD i1 :;?W t -0 "„ ." 1 •I!:,, .:.,. .titi:::.i-s,,,I . (c) ••,,,,,,,10,;m: .r . cp 00 mo •, .. •,,:.A:09.1,,I. cip ,...). f."..v,.41444i4 oa a ct) rii .„..,..vetw,.,„ ci) 3 .,::•,,...., .4.,:l • 0 2) u) - _. CD -0.1 � O = C") •Olb me 13 IMI (Mil Oa CD D ak 0 _ � Z ,, . ,, = Cn x O O CT SAN O O am1+' O • n -S t. Q 0 f- = CD D CD CD p,:,,,, ... .11:illi, CD ... . , ' 4. ., ••••■ '':...,,.'' it ' • • • _ d ,...,,- '41. Ii l',.1,-._ ,,.. 4 ".• • $4* t•- ' LI I • •,1 't•A` A., . ' ''''' 't441."11;i' ‘: ' — . ,,,.,. ,, -1,.•:-.. • ,„ , 1 , '-'-'',.4. -7, , 11 .. / ). -1.tili.... •,i 1 ■ ": - '31,4i . / I• , 'gq ' ••,. ,: , : . . '' I• ..s.4'L '"'. " ' •':" ., ':. ' .o• ,,'11 t .",',.•1 ,,,,, ,$•,., ••'I. •••• -',,r;F. . r' t _-= ' .. . i .t ' :...'ki 1:7'... : '' t ' IL i - ' .It4 . • • ,, . AI , .0,141/7„:•41,_,adl....: / / e ( 7 / • ': ' Aii-= e ......,-- .....c. .. .1 .,..T. r ,/ • / • . . tr,..: Ilt , ,..1 3. . ti I., , , , ,..1.:414L.,..._,....Ataulti-, ! " - :;;;•'.'„ ,, . .,.;'. - :', .' .'".1 f,e ,... •i •-..- • t . •.4 il I , . :.. . ,--- Ji r - - -r '...-.'2 .t.r.,,, ,• .-t&" I.:. ri . • - ... .41„-'4 ' 1. • '''.. -,•- .3•'‘.. -, ' •21.- .• . , _ —,,, , r - r•o;,•':,- - i: - '.'' '::-.4'-', ftl la—NI 44. ':' -.., i.,..' '.,' ....-,,,.:. -,;.. • .'.117 l• • 0 . C .;■.I.i?„1:IiiISII•liktiniebtrirtai.eva,' ,,,:'1,...:,,--.',' a n u a Avppre q t 4 3 iv a). . , •*1.4,..-.vot.4 l'' 1 . , \ ',-7',"'".:: [: t■ 1 . .- CI) t-r• rs....... ..... .... ._, . [.,. .-1,--..- .-, ,.:,- -.., 01 0 * . i . _vt.,,.—. _ Li„ . 1.. i,,. . , . ., ................, .„1/4,... _:. 1:13 -.. - 1 ..... .... , . . ..-,.. ci) Z (D • ,,,... i ::•r.. --,.. ..., .: i .,.....1.,‘Ai I :,..... ■ . A , ., CD .:,.. 1...,""'.‹...........'!—• •. . z•-.1.----4, - , „",„ r ^`,' (": 4 *At, ..:v•r, I 4i,,„,;.;::, i, , ;1114-'" • XI , .di ' - : t-:-,.. ' in'. -...°I. ...* "' V•. ' .....•<I. ,0 r , , '' -''...? ,..:A% 7::il....,...;..... '%'‘.. • la) I . ..:11114-...tore,.;'■•-;1'.!;;Ct:j.:,;11.. l'1.....''''. .:'.: ',.....41,7''' D. ':: i.....e,- • .-.' '...: - * ,,,,,k'... -I :- , . . , . • t ,.......tr `' .. ..Y ; - - , ,-- ,iw.,,,r"- ' 4t— 114 ' It.-• . • „ , . .,telik.A.k.. . • ,. .,,b.:''' .,. - " r. 4° ' .:.*1 ,„ T-•.- -4--- ..,, , . II . , • n 'It . • p:::j. r---- IfS . ..,.., 4 FS • . . -;t% . -•,, • o0 _• � D � Apo D 2 -1 = c n -0 CD C� CD z -. x - CD C) -• = CD — _ O � z � � -.I CO C d' - f-$ D ' ,..1 co I ° < 0 • 0 Cn CD =TWCQ� • CD c ri CD h CD • O t " ♦ 'f �v 1‘ o ...; ,- CD — TT ''.4-14,i� 1 CD O a t i .' V 7. 1 O ,- O j^y ' CD A O Y h CC f 3 • ar l • .. tt,, 1 t b zwwii.r tql�;''. • r.5 1 0 g • , i tl, i' •l 11 :7 \ ••••:•.', '••:, '' 0 * XI XI (1) 20 CD Cni . n • c M - to M• 13 �•a r 7 tw 1 -1 C emim '41 3 -5 cp k...,,,,..„ 0 0 ._. c.,) ,... ,...,..,. .,,,,, .\ ,. , Nu.s,,, ....• ,:,✓ ,, �y�Lr `I lV Asii:.\:‹ ' ,;)koll4„,1114k .1: .. .% '. ■ t: —~^-- ....._ 3 Y_ 0 .. co 404, r 5 0 • • 9 r,.k, � " ' 1 r: f a• e t�l a ' 1 d ,. . A a 5, 4 -1 sP i 111A 6 , c Q 5 • L n EU s O O n , W mC V O 0) +a • •t Q r O y�w y r. E U 9 s O 1 it W I ;y Si— a 1 i. O ` — O Q l 4_ • cal as .4.7. O T 1 b��q �a e3 a) o ;T }}niFxri L o U p ,,ti y1 Y r€ y o a Q r _ • 0 Oci. O1-- In � t., 1 j o w ..t i 41> •_ E N U i , ,, ,f. U O Via' ` OCR X0 0 y •1 . h�, Rem cot? PETITION AGAINST THE PROPOSED REQUIREMENT OF A STREETLIGHT AT ALMOND AVE AND CANYON CREEK RANCH PRIVATE DRIVE. This petition is requesting the removal of the proposed requirement of a streetlight on the North intersection of Almond Avenue and the Canyon Creek Ranch Driveway. We, the below residents of Gooseneck Drive are opposed to the requirement of a streetlight indicated in the Almond Avenue frontage improvements and request it be removed from#DRC2008-01012-Andresen Architecture,Inc. ,' Davis t) Gull �p A�>24-Lai- 3) n G-o°3E/)6Z c -itt 1,: `� -g -zoo( Messersch tt�, � � y- -2ot; C 3 G o-02 , / Q 1 ni 3 Goos4)--h,eck. 163 gl itou 4) Biane [P a IG��% `/ - l • Sl Biane W(/lfL- v Let/,¢- - I I - 2-of 6) COMs -1/4 o ' , nk n '�n -j(-2Oi1. • ///2-//i 1) Blav1c. # SooO truOSeV1t l • ///2-//i John & Andrea Gull 4/4/2011 2 Gooseneck Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737 909-969-1972 The City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission PO Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 ATTN: Tabe van der Zwaag Dear Mr. van der Zwaag, Included in this letter are our comments in opposition to the proposed development #DRC2008-01012-Andresen Architecture, Inc., for the plans to build an 11,906 sq. ft. residence as well as any additional structures and street alterations. In speaking to my immediate resident neighbors along Gooseneck Drive, most all have expressed their disagreement with the proposed widening of Almond Avenue and all have expressed disagreement with the proposed addition of a"standard streetlight" at the intersection of Almond Avenue and the Canyon Creek Ranch private drive. My wife and I have spoken with Sandy Davis (owner of Canyon Creek Ranch and 1 Gooseneck), Dave Messerschmitt (owner of 3 Gooseneck), Carolyn Biane (owner of 5 Gooseneck), and Paul Biane (owner of 6 Gooseneck). The reasons for our opposition and our general consensus are as follows: 1) The widening of Almond Avenue is absolutely unnecessary as only one single family residence is proposed with the addition of no more than 4-6 vehicles added to the current traffic flow. 2) This proposed widening can negatively effect the currently constructed flood control channel which is operating functionally well in its current recently constructed state. In fact, our property as well as several others on Gooseneck was successfully petitioned out of the flood area in a process thru FEMA. We are asking the City of Rancho Cucamonga to provide written assurances to us that the proposed frontage improvements, and Almond Avenue alterations, as well as the extensive grading proposed by the developer for his project, will not have a negative impact on the current flood potential status of our property or, by altering the current flood maps published by FEMA. 3) Almond Avenue at the far north end of Amethyst Avenue connects to no other public thoroughfare as it runs in a westerly direction with the exception of our private road, Gooseneck Drive. As such, widening Almond Avenue will negatively impact the traffic flow onto Gooseneck Drive as more vehicles that inadvertently travel north on Amethyst Avenue (non-residents or non-visitors of the current and proposed residents) will be enticed to drive onto our private road only to find that there is no outlet. We, as residents of Gooseneck Drive do not want any more negative traffic flow to occur onto our private road by the actions of the City of Ranch Cucamonga's planning/engineering departments that are ‘,.. flan 4 requiring Almond Avenue to be widened when there is no logical reason for doing so at this time. 4) As far as the proposed street light is concerned, there is no basis for requiring this also. North of Amethyst Estates, there are no streetlights currently installed on Amethyst Avenue, Almond Ave, or our private road, Gooseneck Drive. 5) Again, there will only be minimal addition to the traffic flow (going south) with one proposed single family residence. Additionally, the equestrian trail in that area is only traveled during the daytime hours and is not used as a hiking trail since it is very much a wilderness area northwest of Gooseneck Drive. As such, there are no safety issues occurring by forgoing the installation of a high intensity street light. In addition, installing a street light will bring significant light pollution to this area which we as current residents do not want to occur. It will also contribute to the aforementioned enticement of more traffic flow to the north of Amethyst Estates into an area only inhabited by minimal residents along private roads thus making our private street the"turnaround" for all misplaced and misdirected vehicles. The City of Rancho Cucamonga and San Bernardino County Flood Control has always understood the need to maintain safety in this area by trying to limit the amount of"non-essential" foot and vehicle traffic into an area which is essentially wilderness flood control populated by very few homes and residents. Due to this and the high risk of fire in this area, there is signage(non-permanent) that has been placed on Amethyst Avenue that indicates"ROAD CLOSED." and "No Trespassing" In addition, Amethyst Avenue below Almond is only fractionally wide enough for two cars traveling in opposite directions to pass safely by each other. By forcing the widening of Almond Avenue, you will create a greater safety issue (bottleneck) as you enter Amethyst Avenue heading south as the road drastically narrows. We, as residents of Gooseneck Drive, are asking you, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to remove the requirements of widening Almond Avenue from the developer as well as the proposed requirement of an added streetlight which will lead to more unnecessary traffic flowing north up Amethyst Avenue, West onto Almond Avenue and eventually terminating at the dead end of Gooseneck Drive. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga is unwilling to remove the requirement of widening Almond Avenue, we are asking the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at the City's or developers expense to provide the residents of Gooseneck road, a private electric gate system at the entrance to Gooseneck Drive that prevents the flow of additional traffic onto our street. We are also requesting that you place larger and more permanent signage at Amethyst Avenue (at or about where Amethyst Avenue narrows) indicating"NO OUTLET" as well as permanent large signage at the head of the equestrian trail and Almond Avenue (prior to Gooseneck Drive) indicating "PRIVATE ROAD, RESIDENTS ONLY). If the City of Rancho Cucamonga maintains the requirement of a streetlight, we are requesting that the light be of low height and profile with the light completely shielded only to illuminate the immediate intersection of Almond Avenue and the • Canyon Creek Ranch private road. Again, we feel that these are proposals to protect our privacy and minimize light pollution and should be performed at the City of Rancho Cucamonga's expense or the developer's expense since it is the City Planning/Engineering Department that is requiring these unnecessary street alterations. As a final option, we are proposing that the city would collect "in lieu fees" from the developer and forego the Almond Avenue frontage improvements until such a time when other proposed developments have been approved and would justify frontage improvements at that time. This would also provide consistency in improvement to both Almond and Amethyst when the other larger proposed developments have been approved and thus avert the bottleneck issue mentioned above in item#5. 6) Other issues we raise in this letter is that the City of Rancho Cucamonga needs to investigate and provide mitigations and protections against the following: a. The potential of the proposed septic system of the proposed project and the very strong potential (according to your engineering department) of polluting the groundwater in our immediate vicinity. b. To mitigate against the potential of the proposed tennis court and associated lighting systems that would add additional and significant noise and light pollution to the area. Require shielded lighting of the developer on this structure. c. The potential of the proposed project creating any negative access and egress to and from our homes during the construction process and, the City of Rancho Cucamonga's requirement to mitigate against any vehicles that are part of this construction project from illegally or improperly parking along Amethyst or Almond Avenues or Gooseneck Drive. Provide no parking signage if necessary in some or all of these areas. inter yi Yours, 4 w`-C ohn & Andrea Gull freL I 20 ! e.Q,Epa tie • /q • �Asue Lllf C/��✓Y � J a. ',, 'olaoio Msse;zsuw� tt n t i24l �( l tt . t4escr .Cc�zul4^r�f � I jz)�Il cp, 77 CANYON CREEK RANCH CCR 3u!! Service equly !!ty nAliCtioco April 5, 2011 CAMONGA APR 0 6 • 2011 City Council of Rancho Cucamonga �G {�/�/p RE: Proposed Tennis Court CC' "C® To Whom It May Concern: �� �`'YG My name is Sandy Davis and my husband and I reside at 9400 Almond Street in Alta Loma. It has been brought to our attention that the Shallan family will be constructing a tennis court to the east of our property line, which happens to be directly across from our horse boarding facility. We believe that the construction and operation of a tennis court within that location will pose a great danger to the riders and horses which utilize the area. With the possibility of projectiles (i.e. balls and rackets) and loud noises disturbing the horses, it could potentially put our clients and their horses in harms way. Horses frighten very easily. Any unexpected noises or projectiles that scare a horse could cause it to buck the rider off. Subsequent to that, the horse could become uncontrollable and cause further damage to itself or others in its path. Quite obviously, this type of situation could become a breeding ground for lawsuits as well. As somebody with 25 years in the horse business, I can tell,you that the existence of this tennis court would not be in the best interest of my clients or their horses. My husband and I have been building homes in Rancho Cucamonga for over 30 years. We have always complied with the City and its codes. Rancho Cucamonga has a long history of being a horse-friendly city. All of the construction up and around the foothills over the years has accommodated the equestrian world very well. The horse property and facility my husband and I own has existed for over 50 years. Please do not allow this tennis court to harm our equestrian patrons. We care very much about the people who board and train here. Thank you for your time. Respectfully, Randy Davis and Sandy Davis X/em A 9400 Almond St. • Alta Loma, CA 91737 • (909) 980-6767 r �� er, 713 ` Paul Biane 5000 Gooseneck Road Alta Loma, California 91737 April 6, 2011 Tabe Van der Zwaag The City of Rancho Cucamonga Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737 Re: DRC 2008-01012 Anderson Architecture LLC Dear Mr. Van der Zwaag, would like to share some concerns about the above referenced project. However the first issue is that we support the project and would like to suggest changes that might help the project better fit with our neighborhood here at the top of Amethyst. The widening of Almond seems excessive for the minimal ` rease in traffic. The widening also is cause for concern with the reconstruction of flood water p Psc+hrne :rh f eqn ' at i:_ of • 6rsti��-. � and �t a= the corner of Almond and Amethyst. This structure will be oversized and where there are now unobstructed view • �/ of the mountain there will be a four foot wall ready for graffiti from the young people that frequent the top of Amethyst for its view. The northern most homes in Amethyst Estates have also enjoyed its north evening view without street lights. Also all residence from those on the top of Archibald the homes that face to the west on Klusman have enjoyed for years a quite unobstructed night valley and mountain views without street lights through a wild life and natural habitat corridor to the south. It is my opinion that a street light at the top of Amethyst or along Almond is just out of place and does not fit with the corridor. Another issue is that there will be some trees removed and vegetative habitat disturbed. tree replacement and shrub pallet t �, aa�3 ;,at ts.ttt�:.t.t. The ttc:. t:.p..�aat,�. ., should only include indigenous trees and shr ubs. I hope these comments and concerns will be addressed making for a be j t. Than •u ft ur co .id- 17: SIGN-IN SHEET PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING APRIL 13, 2011 NA� COMPANY ',' r ADDRESS , ` ," G�f/Ll� Dori& 11-E S C nfOI noo 7 ou+i cm w©`1 r"f`na '4 r C4