Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2015/08/05 - Agenda Packet
P*4•4",--, 4, cit of HO- CAAtiONGA • 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801 City Office: (909) 477-2700 AGENDAS FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD SUCCESSOR AGENCY PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY CITY COUNCIL WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 5, 2015 REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays 4- 7:00 P.M. ORDER OF BUSINESS CLOSED SESSION Tapia Conference Room 5:00 P.M. Call to Order Public Communications City Manager Announcements Conduct of Closed Session REGULAR MEETINGS Council Chambers 7:00 P.M. MEMBERS MAYOR L. Dennis Michael MAYOR PRO TEM Sam Spagnolo COUNCIL MEMBERS William Alexander Lynne B. Kennedy Diane Williams CITY MANAGER John R. Gillison �f,, CITY ATTORNEY James L. Markman CITY CLERK Janice C. Reynolds - CITY TREASURER James C. Frost MB INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC . ''. 4,. II.AM-4IC?( CAMONGA TO ADDRESS THE FIRE BOARD, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL The Fire Board,Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council encourage free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Fire Board, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council by filling out a speaker card and submitting it to the City Clerk. The speaker cards are located on the wall at the back of the Chambers, at the front desk behind the staff table and at the City Clerk's desk. If as part of your presentation, you would like to display visual material, please see the City Clerk before the meeting commences. Any handouts for the Fire Board, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority or City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution. During"Public Communications,"your name will be called to speak on any item listed or not listed on the agenda in the order in which it was received. The "Public Communications" period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items)will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other"Public Communications"which have not concluded during this one-hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. If you are present to speak on an"Advertised Public Hearing"or on an"Administrative Hearing" Item(s),your name will be called when that item is being discussed, in the order in which it was received. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less,as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter, the City's Public Library(-ies) and on the City's website. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the desk located behind the staff table during the Council meeting. LIVE BROADCAST Fire Board,Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access. Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The City has added the option for customers without cable access to view the meetings"on-demand"from their computers. The added feature of"Streaming Video On Demand"is available on the City's website at www.cityofrc.us/cityhall/council/videos.asp for those with Hi-bandwidth (DSUCable Modem)or Low-bandwidth (Dial-up) Internet service. The Fire Board,Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council meet regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m.in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board,Successor Agency,Public Financing Authority and City Council. Copies of the agendas and minutes can be found @ www.cityofrc.us IliIf you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 1 JCITY COUNCIL AGENDA . NL-1,,,ci,C,MONGA AUGUST 5, 2015 :00 P.M. — CLOSED SESSION •CALL TO ORDER — TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM IF Al. Roll Call: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tern Spagnolo Council Members Alexander, Kennedy and Williams CLOSED SESSION CALLED TO ORDER AS THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY AND CITY COUNCIL. B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) �I C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) I D. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS (NO DISCUSSION OR ACTION WILL OCCUR) E. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION — TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM I E1. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF SAN BERNARDINO ROAD AND EAST OF VINEYARD AVENUE; NEGOTIATING PARTIES NETTIE NIELSEN REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND LIDIA TALAVERA REPRESENTING NAI CAPITAL; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. — CITY E2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(B) — NUMBER OF CASES (2) — SUCCESSOR AGENCY E3. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW HIGHWAY,WEST OF ROCHESTER AVENUE; NEGOTIATING PARTIES NETTIE NIELSEN REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND SILVA ZENEIAN REPRESENTING IDS REAL ESTATE GROUP; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS.—CITY. E4. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, NORTH OF WILSON AVENUE, IDENTIFIED AS APN'S 1087-181-26 & 1087-081-08; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: CANDYCE BURNETT, PLANNING DIRECTOR, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND JOHN SCHAFER, VICE- PRESIDENT OF RICHLAND COMMUNITIES, INC. — CITY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, r� :., , PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 2 JCITY COUNCIL AGENDA LA,:. Ito(kAMONGA AUGUST 5, 2015 1!11.mll."1"i".""1" F. RECESS Il CLOSED SESSION TO RECESS TO THE REGULAR FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY AND CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. G. REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER — 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY AND CITY COUNCIL WILL BE CALLED TO ORDER. IT IS THE INTENT TO CONCLUDE THE MEETINGS BY 10:00 P.M., UNLESS EXTENDED BY CONCURRENCE OF THE FIRE BOARD, AUTHORITY BOARD AND COUNCIL. G1. Pledge of Allegiance G2. Roll Call: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tern Spagnolo Council Members Alexander, Kennedy and Williams H. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS H1. City Council Proclamation recognizing the Service and Retirement of Frances T. Howdyshell, Planning Commissioner. H2. Administration of Oath of Office to newly appointed Planning/Historic Preservation Commissioner Richard Macias. H3. Proclamation Designating Rancho Cucamonga as a Purple Heart City. H4. Farewell to Sheriff Deputies Aaron Outlaw and Mike Mason. I. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS l This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection District, Public Financing Authority Board, Successor Agency and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Fire Protection District, Public Financing Authority Board, Successor Agency and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Board, Public Financing Authority Board, Successor Agency and City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Mayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Fire Board, Authority Board, Successor Agency or City Council not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 3 • ••; CITY COUNCIL AGENDA• ��nK .tic+(OCAMONGA AUGUST 5, 2015 The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Fire Board/Successor Agency/Authority Board/Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Fire Board/Successor Agency/Authority Board/Council Member for discussion. J. CONSENT CALENDAR - FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT I J1. Consideration to approve Minutes of: July 15, 2015 (Regular Meeting) J2. Consideration to approve Check Register dated July 8, 2015 through July 28, 2015 for the total of $519,754.76. 1 J3. Consideration to approve the single source purchase of fifty-four (54) Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBAs) and associated equipment, in keeping with the continuity of 18 the SCBAs received from the 2013 Assistance to Firefighters Grant (AFG) from the regional award received by Ontario Fire Department, from Bauer Compressors, of Livermore, CA, in the amount of $369,823.41 to be Funded from Account No. 3288501-5290. K. CONSENT CALENDAR - SUCCESSOR AGENCY K1. Consideration to approve Minutes of: July 15, 2015 (Regular Meeting) ___ L. CONSENT CALENDAR - PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY I L1. Consideration to approve Minutes of: July 15, 2015 (Regular Meeting) M. CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL M1. Consideration to approve Minutes of: July 13, 2015 (Special Meeting — Planning ___ Commissioner Interviews) and July 15, 2015 (Regular Meeting). M2. Consideration to approve Check Register dated July 8, 2015 through July 28, 2015 and 20 payroll ending July 28, 2015 for the total of $10,808,276.04. M3. Consideration to approve a Resolution authorizing the bi-annual routine destruction of City 37 records pursuant to California Government Code Section 34090, the City's Retention Schedule, and other applicable legal citations. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, 4=R.l . PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND • 4 • J CITY COUNCIL AGENDA • g,k_,-h,(t;UMoN;A AUGUST 5, 2015 RESOLUTION NO. 15-146 38 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS SET FORTH IN CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 AND OTHER APPLICABLE LEGAL REFERENCES. M4. Consideration of approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2000- 65 01 (South Etiwanda) with an annual special tax reduction due to district refinancing. RESOLUTION NO. 15-147 67 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-01 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016. M5. Consideration of approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No.2000- 74 02 (Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park) with an annual special tax reduction due to district refinancing. RESOLUTION NO. 15-148 76 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-02 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016. M6. Consideration of approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No.2001- 83 01 (Improvement Area Nos. 1 &2, Series 2001-A), with an annual special tax reduction due to district refinancing. RESOLUTION NO. 15-149 85 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 (IMPROVEMENT AREAS NO. 1 & 2), SERIES 2001-A FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016. M7. Consideration of approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No.2001- 93 01 (Improvement Area No. 3 Zone 7), Series 2001-B with an annual special tax reduction due to district refinancing. RESOLUTION NO. 15-150 95 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016(IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 3 ZONE 7), SERIES 2001- B FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 5 • CITY COUNCIL AGENDA • •:id • ,s2fA,zoi.c.ficAmoNGA AUGUST 5, 2015 M8. Consideration of approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No.2006- 102 01 (Vintner's Grove) with an annual special tax reduction due to district refinancing. RESOLUTION NO. 15-151 104 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2006-01 (VINTNER'S GROVE) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016. M9. Consideration of approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No.2006- 111 02 (Amador on Route 66) with an annual special tax reduction due to district refinancing. RESOLUTION NO. 15-152 113 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2006-02 (AMADOR ON ROUTE 66) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016. M10. Consideration of approval of Amendment No. 2 (Contract CO.15-043) with Pacific Municipal Consultants/Michael Baker International for Contract Planning Services in an amount not to 121 exceed $50,000 to be funded from Account 1 001 31 4-5300 (Contract Services) as approved in the FY 2015-2016 budget. M11. Consideration to approve Plans and Specifications for the"Public Safety IAQ HVAC Project" 122 and authorize the City Clerk to advertise the"Notice Inviting Bids", to be funded from Account No. 1017701-5650/1893017-0. 123 RESOLUTION NO. 15-153 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS FOR "PUBLIC SAFETY IAQ HVAC PROJECT" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS M12. Consideration of approval to accept Improvements and file a Notice of Completion for 127 Landscape Improvements for Tract 18741 located along the west side of Wardman Bullock Road from the north tract boundary to Wilson Avenue and along the north side of Wilson Avenue from Wardman Bullock Road to the west tract boundary, submitted by Pulte Group. RESOLUTION NO. 15-154 129 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 18741 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK M13. Consideration of approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, 130 accept a Maintenance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for Tract 16324 located at the northerly end of Wardman Bullock Road, submitted by Meritage Homes of California, Inc. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 6 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AUGUST 5, 2015 RESOLUTION NO. 15-155 132 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16324 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK M14. Consideration of approval to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Parcel Map 19043 133 located on the north side of Amber Lane, 370'west of Etiwanda Avenue Centerline, submitted by Williams Construction & Backhoe Service, Inc. M15. Consideration to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the 135 contract for the base bid and alternate bid items 1-3, in the amount of $1,327,795.10, to the lowest responsive bidder, All American Asphalt, and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of$132,779.51, for the 4th Street from Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue, 7th Street from Archibald Avenue to Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue from 4th Street to Foothill Boulevard Pavement Rehabilitation Projects to be funded from Gas Tax RT7360 and Measure I Funds, Account Nos. 1177303-5650/1852177-0, 1176303- 5650/1853176-0 and 1174303-5650/1876174-0. M16. Consideration to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. 1001009152 in the amount of 137 $15,075.89, for the FY 2012/2013 Sidewalk Improvements For Bus Stops At 51 Locations, Contract No. 13-294. M17. Consideration to accept the Solar Carport System Installation at the City of Rancho 139 Cucamonga City Hall, Contract No. 15-035 as complete, release the bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of$342,964.00. RESOLUTION NO. 15-160 142 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE SOLAR CARPORT SYSTEM INSTALLATION AT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY HALL CONTRACT NO. 15-035 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK M18. Consideration to approve Resolution urging the State to provide new sustainable funding for 143 State and Local Transportation Infrastructure. RESOLUTION NO. 15-161 145 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, URGING THE STATE TO PROVIDE NEW SUSTAINABLE FUNDING FOR STATE AND LOCAL TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, *`I PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 7 ;• �'J :. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA �� . 1/2AKCiit)tikAMONGA AUGUST 5, 2015 N. CONTINUED ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY COUNCIL The following Public Hearing items are continued from the July 15, 2015 City Council Meeting. N1. Consideration of public interest, convenience and necessity in granting a Taxicab Service 152 Permit to American Cab. N2. Consideration of public interest, convenience and necessity in granting a Taxicab Service 173 Permit to RYKAL, LLC dba Yellow Cab as there was a change of ownership. 0. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY COUNCIL The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Mayor will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 01. Consideration of approval the Resolution confirming the diagrams and assessments, 197 approve the annual engineer's reports, and order the levy and collection of annual assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No's. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 AND 10, inclusive, for Fiscal Year 2015/2016. RESOLUTION NO. 15-156 200 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND ASSESSMENTS, APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND ORDERING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO'S. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 AND 10, INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 02. Consideration of approval the Resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, approve 468 the annual engineer's report, and order the levy and collection of the annual assessments within Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 for Fiscal Year 2015/2016. No increase in the assessment rate is being proposed or permitted. RESOLUTION NO. 15-157 470 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT, APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT AND PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 8 .•. .�• • •;•J CITY COUNCIL AGENDA LeAtitlit aJCAMONC,A AUGUST 5, 2015 03. Consideration of approval the Resolution confirming the diagrams and assessments, 483 approve the annual engineer's reports and order the levy and collection of annual assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance District No's. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, inclusive, for Fiscal Year 2015/2016. No increase in assessment rates is proposed or permitted. RESOLUTION NO. 15-158 486 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND THE ASSESSMENTS, APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND ORDERING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NO'S. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, INCLUSIVE, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 P. C MANAGERE CITY COUNCIL/FIRE S STAFF DISTRICT RPORTS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. P1. Consideration of approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the 635 Paul Biane Library Second Floor Tenant Improvements, to be funded from Library Funds (1329601-5650) for construction of said project. - City RESOLUTION NO. 15-159 637 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "PAUL BIANE LIBRARY SECOND FLOOR TENANT IMPROVEMENTS" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS P2. Consideration of the Waiver of Inspection and Permit Fees for FY 2015-16. — Fire District 643 RESOLUTION NO. FD 15-021 645 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, WAIVING THE COLLECTION OF SPECIFIC FEES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015-16. P3. A report from Fire and GIS staff on recent joint training opportunities and cooperative 651 community outreach campaigns. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY,•j PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 9 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA f • OcAti3O„,.;. AUGUST 5, 2015 Q. COUNCIL BUSINESS II The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. 01. Designation of a Voting Delegate and Alternates for the League of California Cities Annual 652 Business Meeting. Q2. INTER-AGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the --- meetings that were attended.) Q3. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council ___ Member.) R. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING S. ADJOURNMENT I CERTIFICATION I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on July 30, 2015, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and on the City's website. ( in.a A.Troyan, MM Cf.y Clerk Services Director City of Rancho Cucamonga July 13, 2015 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER I A special meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Monday, July 13, 2015, in the Tri-Communities Conference Room at City Hall located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor L. Dennis Michael called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m. Candyce Burnett, Planning Director led the Pledge of Allegiance. Present were Council Members: Bill Alexander, Diane Williams, Lynne Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem Sam Spagnolo and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager/Economic & Community Development, Candyce Burnett, Planning Director, and Linda Troyan, City Clerk Services Director. B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS I No communication was made from the public. C. ITEM(S) OF BUSINESS C1. DISCUSS AND FINALIZE INTERVIEW QUESTIONS, INTERVIEW CANDIDATES AND SELECT AND APPOINT A MEMBER TO FILL THE VACANCY ON THE PLANNING/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION. Council clarified which questions would be asked of the candidates and an evaluation rating sheet was provided. It was determined that the following questions would be asked of each candidate: A. What skills, education, strengths and expertise do you feel you bring to the Planning Commission? (Mayor Michael) B. What do you consider to be the biggest planning-related issue facing the City today and why? (Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo) C. High Density and Transit Oriented Development is part of the future for Rancho Cucamonga. Specifically the City is investigating creating an urban corridor along Foothill Blvd and identified locations around major transportation activities such as the Metrolink station and bus lines. Describe the benefits and challenges the city may face with these developments and what your thought process would be when considering such development applications. (Council Member Williams) * DRAFT * July 13, 2015 I Special Meeting Minutes of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council I Page 1 of 2 D. Rancho Cucamonga has been shifting from a rapid growth city to an infill development community. With inf ill development comes a new set of challenges and opportunities. What do you see as those challenges and how you would balance the future growth of the city while respecting the existing character and feel of established neighborhoods and commercial developments, including preservation of our key historical resources? (Council Member Kennedy) E. If the Council sets a land use policy or establishes a land use direction that you do not agree with, would you support it? (Council Member Alexander) F. What haven't we asked you that you would like to share with us? (Mayor Michael) The following candidates were interviewed: 10:30 a.m. Marie Barna 11:15 a.m. Tony Guglielmo 12:00 Noon Lunch Break 1:00 p.m. Joe Stofa 1:45 p.m. Richard Macias In accordance with Chapter 2.20.050 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Mayor Michael nominated Richard Macias to fill the unexpired seat on the Planning/Historic Preservation Commission. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Williams, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo, to appoint Richard Macias to fill the vacancy on the Planning/Historic Preservation Commission with a term ending December 31, 2015. Motion carried 5-0. Though voting in support of the motion, Council Member Alexander's noted his first choice was Joe Stofa and his second choice was Richard Macias. D. ADJOURNMENT I The meeting adjourned at 2:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Linda A. Troyan, MMC City Clerk Services Director Approved: * ` ` ' * DRAFT * July 13, 2015 I Special Meeting Minutes of the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council I Page 2 of 2 July 15, 2015 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CLOSED SESSION, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER The City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a closed session on Wednesday, July 15, 2015 in the Tapia Conference Room at the Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:00 p.m. by Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Present were Council Members: Bill Alexander, Lynne Kennedy, Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tern Sam Spagnolo and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager;James L. Markman, City Attorney; Linda Daniels,Assistant City Manager; Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services; Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development; and Nettie Nielsen, Community Services Director. B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEMS I The following closed session item was considered: E1. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF SAN BERNARDINO ROAD AND EAST OF VINEYARD AVENUE; NEGOTIATING PARTIES NETTIE NIELSEN REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND LIDIA TALAVERA REPRESENTING NAI CAPITAL; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. — CITY IC. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) I No public communications were made. ID. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS I No discussion or action was taken. RECESS I The closed session recessed at 6:15 p.m. with no action taken. REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBER * DRAFT * July 15, 2015 I Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 1 of 14 The regular meetings of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council reconvened in the Council Chambers at City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,California. Mayor L. Dennis Michael called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present were Council Members: Bill Alexander, Lynne Kennedy, Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tern Sam Spagnolo and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Linda Daniels, Assistant City Manager; James L. Markman, City Attorney; Linda A. Troyan, City Clerk Services Director and Adrian Garcia, Assistant City Clerk. Mayor Pro Tern Spagnolo led the Pledge of Allegiance. IH. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS J H1. Update on Special Olympic World Game Host Town Activities July 21-24, 2015. Francie Palmer, Communication Manager, highlighted some of the Host Town activities planned for the week of July 21 — 24, 2015 in Rancho Cucamonga to welcome delegations participating in the Special Olympics World Games. H2. Announcement of Wilson Ave Extension Project Ribbon Cutting August 1, 2015. Tiffany Cooper, Management Analyst Ill, Engineering, invited everyone to attend the Wilson Avenue Extension Project Ribbon Cutting event on Saturday, from 9:00 am - 12:00 pm. Mike Parmer, Management Analyst I, City Manager's Office, talked about Healthy RC's participation at the event. H3. Administration of Oath of Office to newly appointed Planning/Historic Preservation Commissioner effective August 1, 2015. Item rescheduled to the August 5, 2015 City Council meeting. I. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS 11. Jim Moffatt opposed the use of taxes for street and park maintenance. 12. Allison Kreider spoke in opposition to the proposed new hours for the Animal Center. 13. Dana Keithly remarked about animal control services. 14. Susan Keithly opposed the proposed new operating hours for the Animal Center, particularly closing on Monday. 15. Bill Hanlon spoke in opposition to the West Side Neighborhood Parks and Lighting District No. 1 and suggested a discount for Veterans along with the senior discount. 16. David Dykstra complimented staff on promotion efforts pertaining to water conservation and spoke about the Special Olympics World Games and the animal shelter. 17. Curt Lewis, Congressman Pete Aguilar's Office, announced sponsorship of a "Senior Fair" on Friday, August 21, 2015 from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. at the Abundant Living Family Church in Rancho Cucamonga. * DRAFT * July 15, 2015 I Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 2 of 14 CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Fire Board/Successor Agency/Authority Board/Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Fire Board/Successor Agency/Authority Board/Council Member for discussion. J. CONSENT CALENDAR - FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT President Michael removed Items J6 and J7 and Board Member Alexander removed Item J8 from the Consent Calendar for discussion. J1. Consideration to approve Minutes of: July 1, 2015 (Regular Meeting) J2. Consideration to approve Check Register dated June 24, 2015 through July 7, 2015 for the total of$248,307.27. J3. Consideration to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of June 30, 2015. J4. Approval of a Purchase and Sale Agreement (PSA) between Alfredo Macias and Hilda F. Hordyk, Trustees of the Macias/Hordyk Family Revocable Trust, Dated May 30, 2003 (Sellers) and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (Buyer) for the acquisition of 0.49 acres located on the north side of San Bernardino Road, west of Vineyard, known as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel Number 0208-091-72, in the amount of$437,500, plus a closing cost contingency of$25,000, funded from Account Number 3288501-5600. J5. Approval of a Purchase and Sale Agreement (PSA) between David J. and Elizabeth F. Walters, Trustees of the David J. and Elizabeth F. Walters Living Trust, Dated December 30, 2013 (Sellers) and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (Buyer) for the acquisition of 0.23 acres located on the north side of San Bernardino Road, west of Vineyard, known as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel Number 0208-091-36, in the amount of $437,500, plus a closing cost contingency of $25,000, funded from Account Number 3288501-5600 and approve an appropriation in the amount of$125,000 to be funded from Fire District Capital Land Purchase Reserve Fund balance to Account No. 3288501-5600. MOTION: Moved by Vice-President Spagnolo, seconded by Board Member Williams,to approve the Staff Recommendations in the Staff Reports for Consent Calendar Items J1 —J5, except J6, J7 and J8 which were removed for discussion. Motion carried 5-0. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR FOR DISCUSSION J6. Consideration of approval to set annual special tax levy for Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 85-1 (CFD No. 85-1) for Fiscal Year 2015/2016 with 5% reduction. RESOLUTION NO. FD 15-017 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/16. J7. Consideration of approval to set annual special tax levy for Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 88-1 (CFD No. 88-1) for Fiscal Year 2015/16 with 5% reduction. * DRAFT * July 15, 2015 I Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 3 of 14 RESOLUTION NO. FD 15-018 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/16. President Michael commented the reduction in the assessment rates for Consent Calendar Items J6 and J7 are examples of the Board's commitment to lower taxes when they can. This is the first time a reduction in the assessment has occurred for a Community Facilities District for fire protection services. MOTION: Moved by President Michael, seconded by Board Member Williams, to approve the Staff Recommendations in the Staff Reports for Consent Calendar Items J6 and J7. Motion carried 5-0. J8. Consideration of approval of a Resolution adopting a Side Letter amending the Memorandum of Understanding with the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Management Employees Group. RESOLUTION NO. FD 15-020 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SIDE LETTER AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE DISTRICT AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES GROUP. Board Member Alexander opposed adoption of the Side Letter as it includes unreasonable increases to employee salaries that are already considered well paid, especially in comparison to salaries and benefits in the private sector at this time. Vice-President Spagnolo stated he didn't disagree with Board Member Alexander regarding the comparison of public to private sector salaries and past Fire District salaries and benefits but noted the duties of the Fire Chief and his staff have changed over the years. The role of the Fire Chief today is different than it was years ago. The position is more diverse, more involved in the community, and more of a spokesperson on multiple issues than in the past. Prior to September 111h, the term first responder was never spoken but now it is as well as incorporated into the Fire Department. In response to Vice-President Spagnolo, City Manager Gillison responded the Side Letter increases the employee paid employer portion of CaIPERS to 8%for the Fire Chief position which is more than any other City employee. President Michael believed that while Fire District salaries may appear high, employees are paid equivalent to and sometimes less than in other cities. He reminded everyone that the current Fire District Board Members did not approve a 3% at 50 retirement with full benefits, but since that time has made changes. The District is doing what it can to attract and retain the best of the best. The role of the Fire Chief has changed over the years, especially pertaining to its increased role, responsibility, complexity and service in the community. MOTION: Moved by Vice-President Spagnolo, seconded by Board Member Williams,to approve the Staff Recommendations in the Staff Reports for Consent Calendar Item J8. Motion carried 4-1 with Board Member Alexander opposed. * DRAFT * July 15, 2015 I Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 4 of 14 K. CONSENT CALENDAR - SUCCESSOR AGENCY K1. Consideration to approve Minutes of: July 1, 2015 (Regular Meeting) MOTION: Moved by Agency Member Williams, seconded by Vice-Chairman Spagnolo, to approve the Minutes of July 1, 2015. Motion carried 5-0. IL. CONSENT CALENDAR - PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY L1. Consideration to approve Minutes of: July 1, 2015 (Regular Meeting) MOTION: Moved by Board Member Alexander, seconded by Board Member Williams, to approve the Minutes of July 1, 2015. Motion carried 5-0. M. CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL Ml. Consideration to approve Minutes of: July 1, 2015 (Regular Meeting) M2. Consideration to approve Check Register dated June 24, 2015 through July 7, 2015 and payroll ending July 7, 2015 for the total of $3,815,469.02. M3. Consideration to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of June 30, 2015. M4. Consideration for approval of an award to Insight Public Sector for the purchase of VMware Software Maintenance and subscription renewal in the amount of $67,758.04 from Account No. 1001209-5300 (Contract Services). M5. Consideration of approval of Resolutions ordering the preparation of the annual engineer's reports to initiate proceedings to levy annual assessments, preliminarily approve the annual engineer's reports, declaring the City Council's intention to levy annual assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, inclusive, for Fiscal Year 2015/16 and setting the time and place for a public hearing thereon. No increase of assessment rates is proposed. RESOLUTION NO. 15-116 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ASSESSMENT LAW FOR PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LEVY WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, AND 8, INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015-16. RESOLUTION NO. 15-117 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PRELIMINARILY APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, AND 8, INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015-16. * DRAFT * July 15, 20151 Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Page 5 of 14 RESOLUTION NO. 15-118 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015-2016 IN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, AND 8, INCLUSIVE,AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON. M6. Consideration of approval of Resolutions ordering the preparation of the annual engineer's reports to initiate proceedings to levy annual assessments, preliminarily approve the annual engineer's reports, declaring the City Council's intention to levy annual assessments within Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 and 10 for Fiscal Year 2015/16 and setting the time and place for a public hearing thereon. RESOLUTION NO. 15-119 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ASSESSMENT LAW FOR PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LEVY WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9, AND 10, INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015-16. RESOLUTION NO. 15-120 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA, PRELIMINARILY APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NO. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9, AND 10, INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015-16. RESOLUTION NO. 15-121 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015-16 IN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9, AND 10, INCLUSIVE, AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON. M7. Consideration of approval of Resolutions ordering the preparation of the annual engineer's reports to initiate proceedings to levy annual assessments, preliminarily approve the annual engineer's report, declaring the city council's intention to levy annual assessments within Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 for Fiscal Year 2015/16 and setting the time and place for a public hearing thereon. No increase of assessment rates for FY 2015/16 is proposed or permitted. RESOLUTION NO. 15-122 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ASSESSMENT LAW FOR PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LEVY WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015-16. * DRAFT * July 15, 2015 I Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 6 of 14 RESOLUTION NO. 15-123 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PRELIMINARILY APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015-16. RESOLUTION NO. 15-124 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015-16 PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON. M8. Consideration of approval of Resolution establishing an annual levy for the costs incurred in the collection of assessments within Assessment District No.93-1, Masi Plaza. No action is required to set the annual special assessment for this district as the special assessments were established during formation of the district and remain unchanged through the life of the bonds, pursuant to the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 Division 10 of the Streets and Highway Code. RESOLUTION NO. 15-125 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF AN ASSESSMENT SURCHARGE FOR THE EXPENSES INCURRED IN THE COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 93-1 M9. Consideration of approval of Resolution setting an assessment levy for the maintenance and/or servicing of a drainage channel within Drainage Area No. 91-2 (Day Canyon Drainage Basin). RESOLUTION NO. 15-126 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE COST OF SERVICE TO BE FINANCED BY BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS TO BE LEVIED IN DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015-2016 AND DETERMINING AND IMPOSING SUCH BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS M10. Consideration of approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2000- 01 (South Etiwanda) with no increase to the current rate. RESOLUTION NO. 15-127 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-01 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016. M11. Consideration of approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2000- 02 (Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park) with no increase to the current rate. RESOLUTION NO. 15-128 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-02 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016. * DRAFT * July 15, 20151 Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Page 7 of 14 M12. Consideration of approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2000- 03 A (Rancho Summit) 2015 special tax refunding bonds. RESOLUTION NO. 15-129 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 A (RANCHO SUMMIT) 2015 SPECIAL TAX REFUNDING BONDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016. M13. Consideration of approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2000- 03 B (Rancho Summit), operation of and maintenance of parks and parkways. RESOLUTION NO. 15-130 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAX "B" FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-03 B (RANCHO SUMMIT) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 TO FINANCE THE OPERATION OF AND MAINTENANCE OF PARK AND PARKWAYS. M14. Consideration of approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2001- 01 (Improvement Area Nos. 1 & 2, Series 2001-A), with no increase to the current rate. RESOLUTION NO. 15-131 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 (IMPROVEMENT AREAS NO. 1 & 2), SERIES 2001-A. M15. Consideration of approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2001- 01 (Improvement Area No. 3 Zone 7), Series 2001-B with no increase to the current rate. RESOLUTION NO. 15-132 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 3 ZONE 7), SERIES 2001-B. M16. Consideration of approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2003- 01 (Improvement Area No. 1 Zones 1, 2 & 3, Series 2003-A)with no increase to the current rate. RESOLUTION NO. 15-133 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX RATE FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2003-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1 ZONES 1, 2 & 3) SERIES 2003-A M17. Consideration of approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2003- 01 (Improvement Area No. 2 Zones 1 & 2, Series 2003-B) with no increase to the current rate. RESOLUTION NO. 15-134 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2003-01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 2 ZONES 1 & 2), SERIES 2003-B. * DRAFT * July 15, 2015 1 Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Page 8 of 14 M18. Consideration of approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2004- 01 (Rancho Etiwanda Estates) with no increase in current rate. RESOLUTION NO. 15-135 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2004-01 (RANCHO ETIWANDA ESTATES) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/16. M19. Consideration of approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2006- 01 (Vintner's Grove) with no increase to the current rate. RESOLUTION NO. 15-136 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2006-01 (VINTNER'S GROVE) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016. M20. Consideration of approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2006- 02 (Amador on Route 66) with no increase to the current rate. RESOLUTION NO. 15-137 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE-ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2006-02 (AMADOR ON ROUTE 66) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016. M21. Consideration to accept the City Council Chambers Media Systems Revitalization Project, CO 14-214, as complete, approve a resolution authorizing the Public Works Services Director to file a Notice of Completion, authorize the release of the retention 35 days after acceptance and approve the final contract amount of $273,433.15. RESOLUTION NO. 15-138 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEDIA REVITALIZATION PROJECT, CO 14-214, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK. M22. Consideration to accept the Civic Center— Parking Lot Lighting Project, Contract No. 15-036 as complete; release the Faithful Performance Bond; Accept a Maintenance Bond; authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond; approve a Resolution authorizing the Public Works Services Director to file a Notice of Completion, release the retention 35 Days after acceptance and approve the final Contract Amount of $93,688. RESOLUTION NO. 15-139 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE CIVIC CENTER — PARKING LOT LIGHTING PROJECT CONTRACT, NO. 15-036 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK. ` DRAFT * July 15, 2015 I Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 9 of 14 M23. Consideration for release of Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. 2175707-M in the amount of $15,285.35,for the Sidewalk Improvements at 9'h Street from Hellman Avenue to Old Spur Track and Baker Avenue from 8'h Street to 9'h Street project, Contract No. 14-011. M24. Consideration for release of Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. 024049290 in the amount of $26,136.31, for the Central Park Pavilion Project, Contract No. 13-146. M25. Consideration to accept the Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway Utility Underground project, Contract No. 14-118 as complete, release the Bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $459,471.92. RESOLUTION NO. 15-140 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE BASE LINE ROAD AT 1-15 FREEWAY UTILITY UNDERGROUND PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 14-118, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK. M26. Consideration of approval of Amendment No. 07 renewing the Professional Services Agreements with a fee increase for All City Management Services, Inc. (CO#13-150) for Professional Crossing Guard Services, in the amount not to exceed $435,000.00. To be funded from Account No. 1 01 8701 5300 (Contract Services FY 2015-16). M27. Consideration to approve a revised Drainage Reimbursement Agreement, DRA-43, for a local drainage facility constructed in conjunction with the development of Tract 17651 located on the south side of Banyan Street east of East Avenue, submitted by K. Hovnanian Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 15-141 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A LOCAL DRAINAGE FACILITY REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR LINE A SOUTH OF TRACT 17651 BETWEEN ETIWANDA AVENUE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM LINE 2-1 AND GYPSUM DRIVE, DRA-43 RESOLUTION NO. 15-142 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING THE LISTED BENEFIT PARCELS FROM THE PREVIOUS REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR LOCAL DRAINAGE FACILITY CONSTRUCTION IN THE ETIWANDA/SAN SEVAINE AREA 5 FOR TRACT 17651, DRA-43. M28. Consideration to approve an Improvement Agreement for local Storm Drain Improvements related to Tentative Tract 18960 located on the north side of Wilson Avenue west of Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Wilson Estates, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 15-143 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR LOCAL STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS RELATED TO TENTATIVE TRACT 18960. * DRAFT * July 15, 2015 1 Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Page 10 of 14 M29. Consideration of the request to approve an agreement for design development and construction document services conducted by RJM Design Group, Inc. for the Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center Replacement project in the amount of$1,170,971.75 plus a 10% contingency in the amount of $117,097.18 for a total of $1,288,068.93 to be funded from account 1120401- 5650/1896120-0. M30. Consideration to join the Inland Empire Regional Broadband Consortium. RESOLUTION NO. 15-145 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JOINING THE INLAND EMPIRE REGIONAL BROADBAND CONSORTIUM M31. Continuation of Resolution No. 15-093, proclaiming the existence of a Local Drought Emergency under Government Code Section 8630 and Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.36. MOTION: Moved by Mayor Pro Tern Spagnolo, seconded by Council Member Kennedy, to approve the Staff Recommendations in the Staff Reports for Consent Calendar Items M1 —M31. Motion carried 5-0. N. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY COUNCIL/FIRE DISTRICT N1. Approval of a Resolution adopting the Fire District's General Fund Final Budget for Fiscal Year 2015/16 in the amount of$50,451,190, which is a combination of$24,215,140 in General Fund Operational Expenditures and $26,236,050 in Capital Reserve Expenditures. — Fire District RESOLUTION NO. FD 15-019 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FIXING A FINAL BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR JULY 1, 2015 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2016 John Gillison, City Manager, gave the report on Item N1, affirmed compliance with Health and Safety Code legal noticing requirements and recommended adoption of the Fire District's General Fund Final Budget for Fiscal Year 2015-2016. President Michael opened the public hearing. Public comment: None. President Michael closed the public hearing. MOTION: Moved by Vice-President Spagnolo, seconded by Board Member Kennedy,to adopt Resolution No. FD15-019 a Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, County of San Bernardino, State of California, fixing a Final Budget for the Fiscal Year July 1,2015 through June 30, 2016 in the amount of $50,451,190, which is a combination of $24,215,140 in General Fund Operational Expenditures and$26,236,050 in Capital Reserve Expenditures.—Fire District Motion carried 5-0. N2. Consideration of a request to approve a contract with Active Network LLC for the upgrade of Class Registration Software to ActiveNet. Funds totaling $68,420 for essential computer equipment approved in the 15/16 Fiscal Year budgeted to be paid from Account 1714001- Computer Equipment/Technology Replacement Fund and amending Resolution No's#. 14-223, 14-097, 14-003 to include a 3.75% ActiveNet financial transaction fee. — City * DRAFT * July 15, 2015 I Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 11 of 14 RESOLUTION NO. 15-144 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN UPDATED FEE SCHEDULE APPLICABLE TO COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT AND AMENDING RESOLUTIONS NO. 14-003, 14-097 AND 14-223. Daniel Schneider, Community Services Superintendent and JoAnne Gwynn, Community Services Manager, gave the report on Item N2 via PowerPoint presentation. Staff recommended upgrading the CLASS registration software to ActiveNet and adoption of Resolution No. 15-144 establishing a 3.75% transaction fee. Mayor Michael opened the public hearing. Public comment: None. Mayor Michael closed the public hearing. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Alexander, seconded by Council Member Kennedy, to approve a contract with Active Network LLC for the upgrade of Class Registration Software to ActiveNet. Funds totaling$68,420 for essential computer equipment approved in the 15/16 Fiscal Year budgeted to be paid from Account 1714001- Computer Equipment/Technology Replacement Fund and amending Resolution No's #. 14-223, 14-097, 14-003 to include a 3.75% ActiveNet financial transaction fee and to adopt Resolution No. 15-144. — City Motion carried 5-0. N2. Consideration of public interest, convenience and necessity in granting a Taxicab Service permit to American Cab. —City(To be Continued to August 5, 2015 City Council Meeting) N3. Consideration of public interest,convenience and necessity in granting a Taxicab Service permit to RYKAL, LLC dba Yellow Cab as there was a change of ownership. — City(To be Continued to August 5, 2015 City Council Meeting) Mayor Michael announced the applicant requested these items be continued to August 5, 2015 and declared the Public Hearings open. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Alexander,seconded by Council Member Williams,to continue the public hearings to August 5, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. Motion carried 5-0. 0. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS CITY COUNCIL 01. Update on 2015 City Council Goals. Linda Daniels, Assistant City Manager, reviewed the background of the City Council goal planning process and highlighted achievements since January 2015. Council consensus to receive and file the update on 2015 City Council Goals. 02. Approval of a Permanent Community Cat Program as standard policy for the placement of healthy feral cats. John Gillison, City Manager, summarized the background of the pilot program recapping it was to return to Council for discussion on its continuance. * DRAFT * July 15, 2015 I Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 12 of 14 Via PowerPoint presentation, Veronica Fincher, Animal Care and Services Director, outlined the Neuter Return Program and the Community Cat Program pilot project for healthy feral cats. In the pilot Community Cat Program, healthy feral cats that have adapted to living with minimal intervention are spayed and neutered and returned to the location they came from. She recommended Council approve a Community Cat Program as standard policy for the placement of healthy feral cats. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Williams, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Spagnolo, to approve a Community Cat Program as standard policy for the placement of healthy feral cats. Motion carried 5-0. 03. Approval of Additional Public Hours for the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Care and Adoption Center. John Gillison, City Manager, introduced Veronica Fincher, Animal Care and Services Director, who reviewed a PowerPoint preservation outlining the proposed change in business hours and the effect services. She recommended a change in the Animal Center business hours to open earlier Tuesday through Sunday, increasing public hours by 14%from 42 per week to 48 per week, and closing Mondays to improve facility maintenance including pending renovations of the Center. Mayor Pro Tern Spagnolo indicated the proposed total number of hours open for six days is only eight hours less than the County which is open seven days a week. Council Member Alexander opposed transitioning to being open six days, eliminating business hours on Mondays. He preferred the center remain open six days to be more convenient for family members who have to be present when adopting a pet. He suggested changing hours to stay open later in the evening and open later in the morning. He stated, most successful shelters are open seven days a week. Council Member Williams was not opposed to closing on Monday, pointing out family members can visit the facility at different times. Most important business hours are Friday, Saturday and Sunday and if possible, expand Saturday hours in the future. In response to Mayor Michael questions, Animal Care and Services Director Fincher acknowledged it is easier to perform facility maintenance and provide individual care to the animals when the facility is closed on Mondays, noting it will be opening 2 hours earlier on Saturday and Sunday to allow families to visit. She confirmed someone will be at the facility to assist with lost and found animals even when closed. Council requested staff to return to Council in six months with a status report on the change in hours. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Williams, seconded by Council Member Kennedy, to adopt staff recommendation concerning the change in business hours and evaluate in six months. Motion carried 4-1 with Council Member Alexander opposed. P. COUNCIL BUSINESS I 01. INTER-AGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.) Council Member Williams reported on her attendance at a Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) for San Bernardino County meeting held earlier that day pertaining to the Morongo Valley Community Services District. Q2. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) There were none. * DRAFT * July 15, 2015 I Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 13 of 14 Q. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING I There were none. R. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Linda A. Troyan, MMC City Clerk Services Director Approved: * * * * * DRAFT * July 15, 2015 1 Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Page 14 of 14 �'�/ �\ Vii? " w \� / `�J� ` f `' / \�- 'r ` Lwjj M .• • . •RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA Proclamation • WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is committed to recognizing individuals who have made a lasting impact on our city and community; and WHEREAS, Frances T. Howdyshell was appointed to the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation in 1991 and served until 1993. Following that she was appointed to the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library Foundation in 2001 and served until 2007. In July of 2007 she was appointed by the City Council to the Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation/Planning Commission where she has served with great distinction for the last 8 years; and WHEREAS, during her service to the Library Foundation her participation was key in raising $5 million for the Performing Arts and Literacy (PAL) Campaign. She also acted as Hostess for several Library Telethons; and • WHEREAS, during her service on the Planning Commission she was forward thinking with respect to the needs of the community and recognized the aging demographic of our City and subsequently became a champion of single-story, residential development for the benefit of our more mature homeowners; and WHEREAS, she was an advocate of Historic Preservation and the creative re- use of historic properties and for preservation efforts of all kinds conducted privately, by the City, and by developers alike; and WHEREAS, while participating in various workshops and reviewing Development Code amendments she embraced innovative design concepts and ideas with respect to Transit Oriented Development (TODs) that could ultimately shape and bring the City of Rancho Cucamonga into the future; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby honor and commend her for many years of devoted service to the Rancho Cucamonga community and wish her many years of well- deserved relaxation and happiness. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, have hereunto set their hand and caused the seal of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to be affixed this 5th day of August 2015. i P , Dennis Michae- r. +n, Mayor 7-,a_....5. ,_i , z Sam Spa ''ols William.L Al .under III { Mayor Pro Te•• Council 1 ember Rid Class Co0Ca �6�frz-/ Lynne A. Kennedy Diane Williams Council Member Council Member j ai ________ �• LtHiOnowl RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA Proclamation WHEREAS, the citizens of the City of Rancho Cucamonga have great admiration and the utmost gratitude for all the men and women who have selflessly served their country and this community in the Armed Forces and have borne the brunt of battle; and WHEREAS, veterans have paid the high price of freedom by leaving their families and communities and placing themselves in harm 's way for the good of all; and WHEREAS, the contributions and sacrifices of the men and women from the City of Rancho Cucamonga who served in the Armed Forces have been vital in defending the hard won freedoms and liberties of our constitution that are treasured by our citizens; and WHEREAS, many citizens of our community have received the Purple Heart Medal in recognition of being wounded while engaged in combat with an enemy force, a singularly meritorious act of essential service; and WHEREAS, August 5, 2015 has officially been recognized as the day in the City of Rancho Cucamonga to remember and recognize veterans who are recipients of the Purple Heart Medal. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby proclaim Rancho Cucamonga as designated Purple Heart City on the Purple Heart Trail in the State of California, honoring the service and sacrifice of our nation's men and women in uniform wounded or killed by the enemy while serving to protect the freedoms enjoyed by all Americans. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, have hereunto set their hand and caused the seal of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to be affixed this 5`h day of August, 2015. Dennis A4icba . : ,. . . Mayor �`� s a / 1 / o Sam Spa"ol. William J. ,4 h. nndcr '' fit- z Mayor Pro Te Council A ember s • s�°acias.coo'`= . .l�;. - I • Lvnne K Diane [T'illirns Council Member Council Member H z, N GO H O tm 0 1--` H T1 llf �)?-.t r - n t, o n c, 5 p ° . o C. s0 ,..ct 0 0 o y o o N c O CPQ Zk N Z cl �O ;mil, a Ii ll, P R ti o C7 yZ-- Zi 4 n R P R t-.. � 0�• i 0 O a o H74 o C H C cb o /� IV Y ZE • CD cO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P1 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/8/2015 through 7/28/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00005349 07/08/2015 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9,320.00 0.00 9,320.00 AP 00005350 07/08/2015 RCCEA 1,328.00 0.00 1.328.00 AP 00005351 07/08/2015 RCPFA 10,449.56 0.00 10,449.56 AP 00005352 07/08/2015 SAN 13ERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 2,535.785.07 0.00 2.535,785.07 AP 00005353 07/08/2015 EXELON GENERATION CO. LLC. 313393.92 0.00 313,993.92 AP 00005354 07/08/2015 PEEK,LINDA V 15,000.00 0.00 15,000.00 AP 00005355 07/08/2015 SHELL ENERGY NORTH AMERICA 17,520.00 0.00 17,520.00 AP 00005356 07/15/2015 FORTISTAR METHANE GROUP LLC 106.516.17 0.00 106.516.17 AP 00005357 07/15/2015 MICHAEL. L. DENNIS 68.25 0.00 68.25 AP 00005358 07/15/2015 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 21.00 0.00 21.00 AP 00005359 07/15/2015 SOUTI• ERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC POWER AUTHORITY 493.88 0.00 493.88 AP 00005360 07/15/2015 RIVERSIDE,CITY OF 6,294.00 0.00 6,294.00 AP 00005361 07/15/2015 VIASYN INC 1,640.00 0.00 1,640.00 AP 00005363 07/22/2015 CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HS DISTRICT 578.52 0.00 578.52 AP 00005364 07/22/2015 VIASYN INC 2.305.35 0.00 2305.35 AP 00005366 07/22/2015 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9,320.00 0.00 9,320.00 AP 00005367 07/22/2015 RCCEA 1,304.00 0.00 1,304.00 AP 00005368 07/22/2015 RCPFA 10,474.56 0.00 10,474.56 AP 00005369 07/28/2015 AHUMADA,ALEXANDER R 0.00 904.08 904.08 AP 00005370 07/28/2015 ALMAND.LLOYD 0.00 615.52 615.52 AP 00005371 07/28/2015 I3ANTAU,VICTORIA 0.00 893.87 893.87 AP 00005372 07/28/2015 BAZAL,SUSAN 0.00 1,323.48 1,323.48 AP 00005373 07/28/2015 BERRY. DAVID 0.00 920.36 920.36 AP 00005374 07/28/2015 BROCK, ROBIN 0.00 893.87 893.87 AP 00005375 07/28/2015 CAMPBELL,GERALD 0.00 1,233.07 1,233.07 AP 00005376 07/28/2015 CARNES, KENNETH 0.00 469.02 469.02 AP 00005377 07/28/2015 CLABBY,RICHARD 0.00 920.36 920.36 • AP 00005378 07/28/2015 CORCORAN.ROBERT 0.00 525.11 525.11 AP 00005379 07/28/2015 COX, KARL 0.00 615.52 615.52 AP 00005380 07/28/2015 CRANE,RALPH 0.00 1,323.48 1,323.48 AP 00005381 07/28/2015 CROSSLAND,WILBUR 0.00 469.02 469.02 AP 00005382 07/28/2015 DAGUE,JAMES 0.00 1,172.22 1,172.22 AP 00005383 07/28/2015 DE ANTONIO, SUSAN 0.00 525.11 525.11 AP 00005384 07/28/2015 DEANS,JACKIE 0.00 600.74 600.74 AP 00005385 07/28/2015 DOMINICK. SAMUEL A. 0.00 893.87 893.87 AP 00005386 07/28/2015 EAGLESON,MICHAEL 0.00 1,172.22 1,172.22 AP 00005387 07/28/2015 FRITCHEY,JOHN D. 0.00 469.02 469.02 AP 00005388 07/28/2015 IIEYDE, DONALD 0.00 1,172.22 1,172.22 AP 00005389 07/28/2015 INFERLICCHIA, ROSALYN 0.00 1,172.22 1,172.22 AP 00005390 07/28/2015 KILMER.STEPHEN 0.00 1,233.07 1,233.07 AP 00005391 07/28/2015 LANE,WILLIAM 0.00 1,560.49 1,560.49 AP 00005392 07/28/2015 LEE,ALLAN J. 0.00 1,066.80 1,066.80 AP 00005393 07/28/2015 LENZE, PAUL E 0.00 1,224.46 1,224.46 AP 00005394 07/28/2015 LONGO,JOE 0.00 173.51 173.51 AP 00005395 07/28/2015 LU'ITRULL, DARRELL 0.00 694.69 694.69 AP 00005396 07/28/2015 MACKALL,BENJAMIN 0.00 173.51 173.51 AP 00005397 07/28/2015 MAYFIELD, RON 0.00 1,323.48 1,323.48 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 1 Current Date: 07/29/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait L Time: 14:55:06 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P2 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/8/2015 through 7/28/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00005398 07/28/2015 MCKEE,JOHN 0.00 615.52 615.52 AP 00005399 07/28/2015 MCMILLEN,LINDA 0.00 246.76 246.76 AP 00005400 07/28/2015 MCNEIL, KENNETH 0.00 615.52 615.52 AP 00005401 07/28/2015 MICHAEL,L. DENNIS 0.00 893.87 893.87 AP 00005402 07/28/2015 MORGAN,BYRON 0.00 2,277.23 2,277.23 AP 00005403 07/28/2015 MYSKOW,DENNIS 0.00 920.36 920.36 AP 00005404 07/28/2015 NAUMAN, MICHAEL 0.00 920.36 920.36 AP 00005405 07/28/2015 NEE,RON 0.00 1,757.12 1,757.12 AP 00005406 07/28/2015 NELSON,MARY JANE 0.00 173.51 173.51 AP 00005407 07/28/2015 PLOUNG,MICHAEL J 0.00 556.94 556.94 AP 00005408 07/28/2015 POST,MICHAEL R 0.00 1,577.31 1,577.31 AP 00005409 07/28/2015 PROULX,PATRICK 0.00 1,560.49 1,560.49 AP 00005410 07/28/2015 ROEDER,JEFF 0.00 1,172.22 1,172.22 AP 00005411 07/28/2015 SALISBURY,THOMAS 0.00 893.87 893.87 AP 00005412 07/28/2015 SMITH,RONALD 0.00 920.36 920.36 AP 00005413 07/28/2015 SPAGNOLO,SAM 0.00 469.02 469.02 AP 00005414 07/28/2015 SPAIN, WILLIAM 0.00 694.69 694.69 AP 00005415 07/28/2015 SULLIVAN,JAMES 0.00 753.31 753.31 AP 00005416 07/28/2015 TAYLOR,STEVE 0.00 1,224.46 1,224.46 AP 00005417 07/28/2015 TULEY,TERRY 0.00 1,172.22 1,172.22 AP 00005418 07/28/2015 VANDERKALLEN,FRANCIS 0.00 1,192.64 1,192.64 AP 00005419 07/28/2015 WALTON,KEVIN 0.00 1,233.07 1,233.07 AP 00005420 07/28/2015 YOWELL,TIMOTHY A 0.00 1,323.48 1,323.48 AP 00359858 07/08/2015 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 79.40 0.00 79.40 AP 00359859 07/08/2015 BRODART BOOKS 5,248.80 0.00 5,248.80 AP 00359860 07/08/2015 BUILDING BLOCK ENTERTAINMENT INC 1,450.00 0.00 1,450.00 AP 00359861 07/08/2015 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 268.00 0.00 268.00 AP 00359862 07/08/2015 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 55.00 0.00 55.00 AP 00359863 07/08/2015 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00359864 07/08/2015 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL TREASURERS ASSOCIATIOD 235.00 0,00 235.00 AP 00359865 07/08/2015 CALPELRA 1,020.00 0.00 1,020.00 AP 00359866 07/08/2015 CLARK,NICHOLAS 700.00 0.00 700,00 AP 00359867 07/08/2015 COOPER,TIFFANY 136.28 0.00 136.28 AP 00359868 07/08/2015 DAIGH,SANDRA CASTLEBERRY 624.00 0.00 624.00 AP 00359869 07/08/2015 DE LA ROSA,DIEGO 800.00 0,00 800.00 AP 00359870 07/08/2015 DELTA DENTAL 1,578.76 0.00 1,578.76 AP 00359871 07/08/2015 DELTA DENTAL 40,665.78 0.00 40,665.78 AP 00359872 07/08/2015 DUPPER,PHILLIP 700.00 0.00 700.00 AP 00359873 07/08/2015 FOLKENS,KIM 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00359874 07/08/2015 GOLDEN STATE RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY 117,110.00 1,127.00 118,237.00*** AP 00359875 07/08/2015 INDIGO,HOTEL 1,740.54 0.00 1,740.54 AP 00359876 07/08/2015 INDIGO,HOTEL 1,740.54 0.00 1,740.54 AP 00359877 07/08/2015 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 201,052.21 0.00 201,052.21 AP 00359878 07/08/2015 PAL CAMPAIGN 10.00 0.00 10.00 AP 00359879 07/08/2015 PITNEY BOWES 15,000.00 0.00 15,000.00 AP 00359880 07/08/2015 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 84.24 0.00 84.24 AP 00359881 07/08/2015 PYRO SPECTACULARS INC 13,000.00 0.00 13,000.00 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 2 Current Date: 07/29/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 14:55:06 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P3 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/8/2015 through 7/28/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00359882 07/08/2015 RAYENHARTZ,DAVID 700.00 0.00 700.00 AP 00359883 07/08/2015 SAN BERNARDINO CTY REAL ESTATE SVCS DEPT 9,166.00 0.00 9,166.00 AP 00359884 07/08/2015 SBPEA 1,086.80 0.00 1,086.80 AP 00359885 07/08/2015 SEXTON,SHEILA 6.00 0.00 6.00 AP 00359886 07/08/2015 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 93.38 0.00 93.38 AP 00359887 07/08/2015 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 150.00 0.00 150.00 AP 00359888 07/08/2015 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 491.65 0.00 491.65 AP 00359889 07/08/2015 SIGN SHOP,THE 298.84 0.00 298.84 AP 00359890 07/08/2015 SOUSA,NARCIE 700.00 0.00 700.00 AP 00359891 07/08/2015 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 216.15 0.00 216.15 AP 00359892 07/08/2015 UNITED WAY 159.00 0.00 159.00 AP 00359894 07/08/2015 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 6,632.18 1,818.74 8,450.92*** AP 00359895 07/08/2015 WESTIN PLAZA SAN DIEGO,THE 8,611.72 0.00 8,611.72 AP 00359896 07/08/2015 WOMEN LEADING GOVERNMENT 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00359897 07/08/2015 WYNDHAM SAN DIEGO BAYSIDE 372.22 0.00 372.22 AP 00359898 07/08/2015 ZAPATA,ALEX 700.00 0.00 700.00 AP 00359899 07/08/2015 12-MARTIN AUTO COLOR INC. 511.26 0.00 511.26 AP 00359900 07/08/2015 A&V SOFTBALL 3,564.00 0.00 3,564.00 AP 00359901 07/08/2015 A'JONTUE, ROSE ANN 275.80 0.00 275.80 AP 00359902 07/08/2015 ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 7,742.01 0.00 7,742.01 AP 00359903 07/08/2015 ACEY DECY EQUIPMENT INC. 219.38 0.00 219.38 AP 00359904 07/08/2015 AC'T'ION AWARDS INC. 119.08 0.00 119.08 AP 00359905 07/08/2015 ADAGE DANCE CENTER 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 AP 00359906 07/08/2015 ADAPT CONSULTING INC 1,896.60 0.00 1,896.60 AP 00359907 07/08/2015 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 15,137.50 0.00 15,137.50 AP 00359908 07/08/2015 ALBERTOS MEXICAN FOOD 231.83 0.00 231.83 AP 00359909 07/08/2015 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC. 4,372.00 0.00 4,372.00 AP 00359910 07/08/2015 ALLIED BARTON SECURITY SERVICES LLC 2,579.60 0.00 2,579.60 AP 00359911 07/08/2015 ALPHAGRAPHICS 66.15 0.00 66.15 AP 00359912 07/08/2015 AMTECI-I ELEVATOR SERVICES 268.26 0.00 268.26 AP 00359913 07/08/2015 ARTISTIC RESOURCES CORPORATION 6,077.34 0.00 6,077.34 AP 00359914 07/08/2015 AUFBAU CORPORATION 19,362.00 0.00 19,362.00 AP 00359915 07/08/2015 BAB STEERING HYDRAULICS INC 0.00 5,208.32 5,208.32 AP 00359916 07/08/2015 BANK OF AMERICA MERRILL LYNCH 0.00 85,672.81 85,672.81 AP 00359917 07/08/2015 BIBLIOTHECA ITG 1,704.00 0.00 1,704.00 AP 00359918 07/08/2015 BISHOP COMPANY 980.29 0.00 980.29 AP 00359919 07/08/2015 CABLE INC. 1,012.37 0.00 1,012.37 AP 00359920 07/08/2015 CALIFORNIA DIVISION OF THE STATE ARCHITECT 923.70 0.00 923.70 AP 00359921 07/08/2015 CALLACI,ALLEN 39,94 0.00 39.94 AP 00359922 07/08/2015 CARPENTER, DEBORA 153,00 0.00 153.00 AP 00359923 07/08/2015 CARTY,DIANE 550.80 0.00 550.80 AP 00359924 07/08/2015 CCS ORANGE COUNTY JANITORIAL INC. 2,992.00 0.00 2,992.00 AP 00359925 07/08/2015 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 0.00 524.88 524.88 AP 00359926 07/08/2015 CHINO MOWER AND ENGINE SERVICE 30.83 0.00 30.83 AP 00359927 07/08/2015 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 2,742.77 0.00 2,742.77 AP 00359928 07/08/2015 CLOUGHESY,DONALD 0.00 53.77 53.77 AP 00359929 07/08/2015 COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF S.B. 160.62 0.00 160.62 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 3 Current Date: 07/29/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 14:55:06 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P4 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/8/2015 through 7/28/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00359930 07/08/2015 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTR INC 387.72 0.00 387.72 AP 00359931 07/08/2015 COOPER,TIFFANY 146.89 0.00 146.89 AP 00359932 07/08/2015 COSTAR REALTY INFORMATION INC 308.25 0.00 308.25 AP 00359933 07/08/2015 CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES INC 3,602.30 0.00 3,602.30 AP 00359934 07/08/2015 D'ANGELO,JULIANA 75.00 0.00 75.00 AP 00359935 07/08/2015 DANCE TERRIFIC 1.157.80 0.00 1.157.80 AP 00359936 07/08/2015 DEPAR'T'MENT OF CONSERVA'T'ION 12.346.02 0.00 12.346.02 AP 00359937 07/08/2015 DIAMOND IN THE ROUGH 480.60 0.00 480.60 AP 00359938 07/08/2015 DICKINSON JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 328.32 0.00 328.32 AP 00359939 07/08/2015 DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT,TI• E 9,412.80 0.00 9.412.80 AP 00359940 07/08/2015 DURKEL,CAROL 256.46 0.00 256.46 AP 00359941 07/08/2015 EDWARD PROFESSIONAL ADVISIORS 900.00 0.00 900.00 AP 00359942 07/08/2015 GARCIA,PETRA 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00359943 07/08/2015 GEOGRAPHICS 872.20 0.00 872.20 Al' 00359944 07/08/2015 GONZALES,ANTOINE'ITE 32.20 0.00 32.20 AP 00359945 07/08/2015 GRAGG. MARY LOU 135.08 0.00 135.08 AP 00359946 07/08/2015 GRAINGER 843.26 0.00 843.26 AP 00359947 07/08/2015 GRAYBAR 569.40 0.00 569.40 AP 00359948 07/08/2015 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 540.00 0.00 540.00 AP 00359949 07/08/2015 HAM RADIO OUTLET 0.00 1,527.81 1.527.81 AP 00359950 07/08/2015 HATANAKA, MARGARET 10.05 0.00 10.05 AP 00359951 07/08/2015 HAWTHORNE LIFT SYSTEMS 483.03 0.00 483.03 AP 00359952 07/08/2015 HI WAY SAFETY INC 9.987.95 0.00 9,987.95 AP 00359953 07/08/2015 HMC ARCHITECTS 0.00 115.810.18 115,810.18 AP 00359954 07/08/2015 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 645 529.29 0.00 529.29 AP 00359955 07/08/2015 1•OT SHOT'S ATHLETIC APPAREL INC. 11,618.35 0.00 11,618.35 AP 00359956 07/08/2015 HOYT LUMBER CO.,SM 0.00 6.10 6.10 AP 00359957 07/08/2015 IDEAL GRAPHICS • 453.60 0.00 453.60 AP 00359959 07/08/2015 INLAND EMPIRE PROPERTY SERVICES INC 0.00 13.627.50 13,627.50 AP 00359960 07/08/2015 INLAND VALLEY DANCE ACADEMY 1,575.00 0.00 1,575.00 AP 00359961 07/08/2015 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES 1,576.64 0.00 1,576.64 AP 00359962 07/08/2015 JOHNNY ALLEN TENNIS ACADEMY 499.80 0.00 499.80 AP 00359963 07/08/2015 JONES AND MAYER,LAW OFFICES OF 12,928.00 0.00 12,928.00 AP 00359964 07/08/2015 JRC HOUSING 4,690.00 0.00 4,690.00 AP 00359965 07/08/2015 KAROUSEL KIDS INC 12,355.00 0.00 12,355.00 AP 00359966 07/08/2015 KOZAKA.SALLY 129.00 0.00 129.00 AP 00359967 07/08/2015 KWEE, DARREN 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 AP 00359968 07/08/2015 LAVISI• ED PRINTING INC 348.30 0.00 348.30 AP 00359969 07/08/2015 LEW EDWARDS GROUP,THE 5,750.00 0.00 5,750.00 AP 00359970 07/08/2015 LORBEL INC 20,507.47 0.00 20,507.47 AP 00359971 07/08/2015 LOS ANGELES FREIGHTLINER 3,962.55 0.00 3,962.55 AP 00359972 07/08/2015 LOZANO,ALEXIS 555.00 0.00 555.00 AP 00359973 07/08/2015 MAGNUM ELECTRONICS INC 0.00 3,140.00 3,140.00 AP 00359974 07/08/2015 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 9,544.34 0.00 9,544.34 AP 00359975 07/08/2015 MARTINEZ TOWING 45.00 0.00 45.00 AP 00359976 07/08/2015 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 254.70 0.00 254.70 AP 00359977 07/08/2015 MERCADO, ROBERT 47.00 0.00 47.00 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 4 Current Date: 07/29/2015 Report CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 14:55:06 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P5 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/8/2015 through 7/28/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00359978 07/08/2015 MERCURY DISPOSAL SYSTEMS INC 813.76 0.00 813.76 AP 00359979 07/08/2015 MIDWEST TAPE 325.00 0.00 325.00 AP 00359980 07/08/2015 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 3,418.00 0.00 3,418.00 AP 00359981 07/08/2015 MINUTEMAN PRESS 280.80 0.00 280.80 AP 00359982 07/08/2015 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 2,177.92 0.00 2,177.92 AP 00359983 07/08/2015 MPND HOLDINGS,LLC 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 AP 00359984 07/08/2015 MUSICSTAR 2.903.20 0.00 2,903.20 AP 00359985 07/08/2015 MYERS TIRE SUPPLY 0.00 270.85 270.85 AP 00359986 07/08/2015 NHS 320.00 0.00 320.00 AP 00359987 07/08/2015 NEWCOMB ANDERSON MCCORMICK INC 1,717.47 1,144.99 2,862.46*** AP 00359988 07/08/2015 OFFICE DEPOT 1,921.45 0.00 1,921.45 AP 00359989 07/08/2015 OKOYE FOUNDATION 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00359990 07/08/2015 PACIFIC MUNICIPAL CONSULTANTS 10,307.50 0.00 10,307.50 AP 00359991 07/08/2015 PACIFIC YOUTH SPORTS 540.00 0.00 540.00 AP 00359992 07/08/2015 PA'FI'ON SALES CORP 56.99 0.00 56.99 AP 00359993 07/08/2015 PEPSI-COLA 175.45 0.00 175.45 AP 00359994 07/08/2015 PRECISION GYMNASTICS 3,366.30 0.00 3,366.30 AP 00359995 07/08/2015 PRO-PLANET INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 1,191.89 0.00 1,191.89 AP 00359996 07/08/2015 PW GILLII3RAND INC 3.535.83 0.00 3,535.83 AP 00359997 07/08/2015 RANCHO CUCAMONGA QUAKES 7,412.00 0.00 7,412.00 AP 00359998 07/08/2015 REGENCY ENTERPRISES INC 1,263.60 0.00 1,263.60 AP 00359999 07/08/2015 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 0.00 8.180.00 8,180.00 AP 00360000 07/08/2015 RIM DESIGN GROUP INC 1.314.25 0.00 1,314.25 AP 00360001 07/08/2015 ROBERTS,CHERYL L 0.00 63.75 63.75 AP 00360002 07/08/2015 ROBINSON, RANE 28.18 0.00 28.18 AP 00360003 07/08/2015 SAN BERNARDINO CTY OFFICE OF THE ASSESSOR 840.00 0.00 840.00 AP 00360004 07/08/2015 SAN BERNARDINO.CITY OF 957.22 0.00 957.22 AP 00360005 07/08/2015 SANCHEZ,CARMEN 51.80 • 0.00 51.80 AP 00360006 07/08/2015 SHRED IT 402.55 0.00 402.55 AP 00360007 07/08/2015 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 35,869.12 0.00 35,869.12 AP 00360008 07/08/2015 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 11.996,51 0.00 11,996.51 AP 00360009 07/08/2015 SIGN SHOP.THE 188.68 0.00 188.68 AP 00360010 07/08/2015 SIRSIDYNIX 26,440.00 0.00 26,440.00 AP 00360011 07/08/2015 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 4,110.75 222.04 4,332.79*** AP 00360012 07/08/2015 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 3,080.00 0.00 3,080.00 AP 00360015 07/08/2015 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27,286.55 1,128.79 28,415.34*** AP 00360016 07/08/2015 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,098.76 0.00 1,098.76 AP 00360017 07/08/2015 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,200.41 0.00 2,200.41 AP 00360018 07/08/2015 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LIBRARY COOPERATIVE 1,200.00 0.00 1,200.00 AP 00360019 07/08/2015 SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 460.00 0.00 460.00 AP 00360020 07/08/2015 SOUTHWEST TRAFFIC SYSTEMS INC 4,474.00 0.00 4,474.00 AP 00360021 07/08/2015 STATEWIDE TRAFFIC SAFETY&SIGNS INC 115.24 0.00 115.24 AP 00360022 07/08/2015 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 1,401.18 0.00 1,401.18 AP 00360023 07/08/2015 S'I'OTZ EQUIPMENT 62.63 0.00 62.63 AP 00360024 07/08/2015 STOVER SEED COMPANY 1,144.80 0.00 1,144.80 AP 00360025 07/08/2015 TELLEZ,TONY 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00360026 07/08/2015 THOMPSON PLUMBING SUPPLY 820.80 0.00 820.80 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 5 Current Date: 07/29/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 14:55:06 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P6 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/8/2015 through 7/28/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00360027 07/08/2015 TONG, WENDY Y 2,500.00 0.00 2,500.00 AP 00360028 07/08/2015 TRUMMELL.ANGELICA 10.05 0.00 10.05 AP 00360029 07/08/2015 UNIVERSITY ENTERPRISES CORP n CSUSB.THE 3,750.00 0.00 3,750.00 AP 00360030 07/08/2015 UPSCO POWERSAFE SYSTEMS INC 5,700.00 0.00 5,700.00 AP 00360031 07/08/2015 UTILIQUEST 6,744.00 0.00 6,744.00 AP 00360032 07/08/2015 VALDEZ.TRINA 98.00 0.00 98.00 AP 00360033 07/08/2015 VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE 3,697.19 0.00 3,697.19 AP 00360034 07/08/2015 VALVERDE SCHOOL OF PERFORMING ARTS 18,150.76 0.00 18,150.76 AP 00360035 07/08/2015 VENTURA,MIKE 324.00 0.00 324.00 AP 00360036 07/08/2015 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 10.21 0.00 10.21 AP 00360037 07/08/2015 VERIZON WIRELESS-LA 233.06 0.00 233.06 AP 00360038 07/08/2015 VERIZON WIRELESS-LA 60.12 0.00 60.12 AP 00360039 07/08/2015 WAL.FERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 2,165.60 39.90 2,205.50*** AP 00360040 07/08/2015 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 7,248.96 0.00 7,248.96 AP 00360041 07/08/2015 WESTLAND GROUP INC 4,222.50 0.00 4.222.50 AP 00360042 07/08/2015 WILLIAMS ARCHITEC'T'S INC 16,069.00 0.00 16,069.00 AP 00360043 07/08/2015 WRIGHT,TINA 78.00 0.00 78.00 AP 00360044 07/08/2015 WRIGHT-EVANS, MELONIE 33.00 0.00 33.00 AP 00360045 07/09/2015 USPS 3,509.45 0.00 3,509.45 AP 00360046 07/09/2015 ABC LOCKSMITHS 1,058.33 0.00 1,058.33 AP 00360047 07/09/2015 AIRGAS USA LLC 175.33 0.00 175.33 AP 00360048 07/09/2015 B&K POWER TO SOLVE 2,257.20 0.00 2,257.20 AP 00360052 07/09/2015 BRODART BOOKS 10,931.68 0.00 10,931.68 AP 00360055 07/09/2015 C V WI) 45,353.82 0.00 45,353.82 AP 00360056 07/09/2015 COLTON SURVEYING INSTRUMENTS 137.95 0.00 137.95 AP 00360057 07/09/2015 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 27.09 0.00 27.09 AP 00360058 07/09/2015 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 150.06 0.00 150.06 AP 00360059 07/09/2015 FORD OF UPLAND INC 50.91 0.00 50.91 AP 00360060 07/09/2015 LIOLLI DAY ROCK CO INC 3,321.75 0.00 3,321.75 AP 00360061 07/09/2015 HYDRO SCAPE PRODUC'T'S INC 576.07 0.00 576.07 AP 00360062 07/09/2015 INTERSTATE ILA (TRIES 9,166.61 745.54 9,912.15 *** AP 00360063 07/09/2015 KME FIRE APPARATUS 0.00 799.13 799.13 AP 00360064 07/09/2015 LIMS AUTO INC 4,259.90 0.00 4,259.90 AP 00360065 07/09/2015 NEC CORPORA'T'ION OF AMERICA 2,494.35 0.00 2,494.35 AP 00360066 07/09/2015 QUICK CRETE PRODUCTS 1,845.73 0.00 1,845.73 AP 00360067 07/09/2015 SUNS'I'ATE EQUIPMENT COMPANY LLC 1,232.22 0.00 1,232.22 AP 00360068 07/09/2015 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 1,910.69 0.00 1,910.69 AP 00360069 07/09/2015 TOMARK SPORTS INC 1,747.84 0.00 1,747.84 AP 00360070 07/09/2015 LANDCA RE 2,059.47 0.00 2,059.47 AP 00360071 07/15/2015 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 309.48 0.00 309.48 AP 00360072 07/15/2015 A CONE ZONE INC. 942.84 0.00 942.84 AP 00360073 07/15/2015 A&V SOFTBALL 1,863.00 0.00 1,863.00 AP 00360074 07/15/2015 AARDVARK 0.00 2,988.57 2,988.57 AP 00360075 07/15/2015 AED BRANDS 0.00 3,450.00 3,450.00 AP 00360076 07/15/2015 AEI-CASC CONSULTING 1,204.13 0.00 1,204.13 AP 00360077 07/15/2015 ALL CITIES TOOLS 0.00 2,138.40 2,138.40 AP 00360078 07/15/2015 ALLIANCE BUS LINES INC 1,849.62 0.00 1,849.62 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 6 Current Date: 07/29/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 14:55:06 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P7 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/8/2015 through 7/28/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00360079 07/15/2015 ALLIANCE BUS LINES INC 754.88 0.00 754.88 AP 00360080 07/15/2015 ALLIANCE BUS LINES INC 2,117.21 0.00 2,117.21 AP 00360081 07/15/2015 ALLIANCE BUS LINES INC 639.60 0.00 639.60 AP 00360082 07/15/2015 ALLIED BARTON SECURITY SERVICES LLC 20,802.87 0.00 20,802.87 AP 00360083 07/15/2015 ALPHAGRAPHICS 390.80 0.00 390.80 AP 00360084 07/15/2015 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 950.00 0.00 950.00 AP 00360085 07/15/2015 ALTA PLANNING AND DESIGN 9.233.74 0.00 9,233.74 AP 00360086 07/15/2015 AMLON INDUSTRIES INC. 3,445.20 0.00 3,445.20 AP 00360087 07/15/2015 ANIMAL HEALTH& SANITARY SUPPLY 388.80 0.00 388.80 AP 00360088 07/15/2015 ARTISTIC RESOURCES CORPORATION 6,199.45 0.00 6,199.45 AP 00360089 07/15/2015 ASSI SECURI'T'Y 10.874.20 0.00 10,874.20 AP 00360090 07/15/2015 AT&TMOBILI'FY 0.00 83.48 83.48 AP 00360091 07/15/2015 BANK OF AMERICA MERRILL LYNCH 0.00 28.182.97 28,182.97 AP 00360092 07/15/2015 BARRON,LAURA 70.09 0.00 70.09 AP 00360093 07/15/2015 BERTINO AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE 172.17 0.00 172.17 AP 00360094 07/15/2015 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC. 0.00 2,413.91 2.413.91 AP 00360095 07/15/2015 CABRAL ROOFING AND WATERPROOFING 353.76 0.00 353.76 AP 00360096 07/15/2015 CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL 1,099.71 0.00 1.099.71 AP 00360097 07/15/2015 CCS ORANGE COUNTY JANITORIAL INC. 0.00 371.85 371.85 AP 00360098 07/15/2015 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 229.58 0.00 229.58 AP 00360099 07/15/2015 CINEVATIVE 12,543.45 0.00 12,543.45 AP 00360100 07/15/2015 CINTAS CORP.#150 1,145.19 0.00 1,145.19 AP 00360101 07/15/2015 CLARK SEIF CLARK INC. 2,085.60 0.00 2,085.60 AP 00360102 07/15/2015 CLARK.KAREN 1,382.40 0.00 1.382.40 AP 00360103 07/15/2015 CLEARWATER GRAPHICS INC 502.20 0.00 502.20 AP 00360104 07/15/2015 COST RECOVERY SYSTEMS INC 10,000.00 0.00 10,000.00 AP 00360105 07/15/2015 D& D SERVICES INC. 430.00 0.00 430.00 AP 00360106 07/15/2015 D AND K CONCRE'T'E COMPANY 1,209.60 0.00 1,209.60 AP 00360107 07/15/2015 DEER CREEK CAR WASH 1,021.50 0.00 1,021.50 AP 00360108 07/15/2015 DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION 0.00 108.00 108.00 AP 00360109 07/15/2015 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 258.62 0.00 258.62 AP 00360110 07/15/2015 DISASTER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS INC. 0.00 680.11 680.11 AP 00360111 07/15/2015 DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT,THE 356.00 0.00 356.00 AP 00360112 07/15/2015 DUNN,ANN MARIE 925.50 0.00 925.50 AP 00360113 07/15/2015 DURATECH USA INC. 260.49 0.00 260.49 AP 00360114 07/15/2015 EIGHTH AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC 258.12 0.00 258.12 AP 00360115 07/15/2015 ENTERSECT CORP 79.00 0.00 79.00 AP 00360116 07/15/2015 EXPERIAN 52.24 0.00 52.24 AP 00360117 07/15/2015 FLEET SERVICES INC. 0.00 1,522.80 1,522.80 AP 00360118 07/15/2015 FREEDOM NEWS GROUP 22,343.80 0.00 22,343.80 AP 00360119 07/15/2015 FRITTS FORD 154.54 0.00 154.54 AP 00360120 07/15/2015 FRS ENVIRONMENTAL 291.54 0.00 291.54 AP 00360121 07/15/2015 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 6,214.82 0.00 6,214.82 AP 00360122 07/15/2015 GIORDANO,MARIANNA 171.00 0.00 171.00 AP 00360123 07/15/2015 GLOBALSTAR 74.66 0.00 74.66 AP 00360124 07/15/2015 GOLDEN OPENINGS INC. 297.50 0.00 297.50 AP 00360125 07/15/2015 GOODYEAR TIRE AND RUBBER CO. 8,554.81 0.00 8,554.81 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 7 Current Date: 07/29/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait L Time: 14:55:06 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P8 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/8/2015 through 7/28/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Cih, Fire Amount AP 00360126 07/15/2015 GRAGG,MARY LOU 1,872.15 0.00 1.872.15 AP 00360127 07/15/2015 GRAINGER 3,368.85 198.00 3,566.85 *** AP 00360128 07/15/2015 GRAPHICS FACTORY INC. 2,234.73 0.00 2,234.73 AP 00360129 07/15/2015 HALO BRANDED SOLUTIONS 2,535.84 0.00 2,535.84 AP 00360130 07/15/2015 HAWES,STEPHANIE 18.00 0.00 18.00 AP 00360131 07/15/2015 HAWTHORNE LIFT SYSTEMS 31.10 0.00 31.10 AP 00360132 07/15/2015 HEARTSAVERS LLC 0.00 20.00 20.00 AP 00360133 07/15/2015 HI WAY SAFETY INC 27.00 0.00 27.00 AP 00360134 07/15/2015 HILLS PETNUTRITION SALES INC 3,115.97 0.00 3,115.97 AP 00360135 07/15/2015 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 645 161.16 0.00 161.16 AP 00360136 07/15/2015 HOYT LUMBER CO..SM 0.00 45.12 45.12 AP 00360137 07/15/2015 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY IN1 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00360138 07/15/2015 IMPETT,VICTORIA ANN 566.13 0.00 566.13 AP 00360139 07/15/2015 INLAND EMPIRE'POURS AND TRANSPORTATION 2,105.50 0.00 2,105.50 AP 00360140 07/15/2015 INLAND VALLEY DANCE ACADEMY 558.00 0.00 558.00 AP 00360141 07/15/2015 INLAND VALLEY EMERGENCY PET CLINIC 58.50 0.00 58.50 AP 00360142 07/15/2015 INLAND VALLEY RV SERVICE&SUPPLIES 396.60 0.00 396.60 AP 00360143 07/15/2015 INTEGRITY DOOR&HARDWARE INC 1,468,60 0.00 1,468.60 AP 00360144 07/15/2015 INTERACTIVE DATA CORPORATION 231.04 0.00 231.04 AP 00360145 07/15/2015 INTERNATIONAL LINE BUILDERS INC 72,064.54 0.00 72,064.54 AP 00360146 07/15/2015 INTERNATIONAL LINE BUILDERS INC 26,777.20 0.00 26,777.20 AP 00360147 07/15/2015 J AND S STRIPING CO INC 2,277.00 0.00 2,277.00 AP 00360148 07/15/2015 JONES AND MAYER.LAW OFFICES OF 8,128.00 0.00 8,128.00 AP 00360149 07/15/2015 JRC HOUSING 1,230.00 0.00 1.230.00 AP 00360150 07/15/2015 L E H AND ASSOCIATES 39,800.00 0.00 39,800.00 AP 00360151 07/15/2015 LAKESHORE LEARNING MATERIALS 272.38 0.00 272.38 AP 00360152 07/15/2015 LIFE ASSIST INC 0.00 173.76 173.76 AP 00360153 07/15/2015 LOS ANGELES FREIGHTLINER - 51.03 0.00 51.03 AP 00360154 07/15/2015 MAIN STREET SIGNS 470.77 0.00 470.77 AP 00360155 07/15/2015 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 2,913.20 0.00 2,913.20 AP 00360156 07/15/2015 MARK CHRISTOPHER INC 607.15 0.00 607.15 AP 00360157 07/15/2015 MC AVOY&MARKHAM 3,513.24 0.00 3,513.24 AP 00360158 07/15/2015 MCI 32.12 0.00 32.12 AP 00360159 07/15/2015 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 727.07 0.00 727.07 AP 00360160 07/15/2015 MEDLEY FIRE PROTECTION INC 8,400.00 7,174.41 15,574.41 *** AP 00360161 07/15/2015 MEINEKE CAR CARE CENTER 792.45 0.00 792.45 AP 00360162 07/15/2015 MERCADO.ROBERT 47.00 0.00 47.00 AP 00360163 07/15/2015 MGT OF AMERICA INC 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 AP 00360164 07/15/2015 MIDWEST TAPE 2,474.79 0.00 2,474.79 AP 00360165 07/15/2015 MILANES,YIKCIA 1,112.50 0.00 1,112.50 AP 00360166 07/15/2015 MING HO CONSTRUCTION 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 AP 00360167 07/15/2015 MOST DEPENDABLE FOUNTAINS INC 4,776.00 0.00 4,776.00 AP 00360168 07/15/2015 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 241.16 0.00 241.16 AP 00360169 07/15/2015 NEW COLOR SCREEN PRINTING&EMBROIDERY 336.96 0.00 336.96 AP 00360170 07/15/2015 NINYO&MOORE 24,130.75 0.00 24,130.75 AP 00360171 07/15/2015 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 1,148.00 101.00 1,249.00*** AP 00360172 07/15/2015 OCLC INC 50.45 0.00 50.45 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 8 Current Date: 07/29/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 14:55:06 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P9 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/8/2015 through 7/28/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00360174 07/15/2015 OFFICE DEPOT 10,729.17 314.83 11,044.00*"* AP 00360176 07/15/2015 ONTARIO SPAY AND NEUTER INC 2,025.00 0.00 2,025.00 AP 00360177 07/15/2015 OPARC 352.00 0.00 352.00 AP 00360178 07/15/2015 PARKES. DR KEVIN 0.00 12,000.00 12,000.00 AP 00360179 07/15/2015 I'ERERA. MICHELLE 24.55 0.00 24.55 AP 00360180 07/15/2015 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 1,134.26 0.00 1,134.26 AP 00360181 07/15/2015 PIMENTEL,IRENE 40.00 0.00 40.00 AP 00360182 07/15/2015 PIONEER MANUFACTURING 3,505.68 0.00 3,505.68 AP 00360183 07/15/2015 POWELL,SCOTT 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00360184 07/15/2015 PRINTERS,THE 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00360185 07/15/2015 PRO SALES GROUP INC 3.123.04 0.00 3,123.04 AP 00360186 07/15/2015 PRO SPRAY EQUIPMENT 870.20 0.00 870.20 AP 00360187 07/15/2015 PROVO ENGINEERING 0.00 250.00 250.00 AP 00360188 07/15/2015 PUMP MAN INC 2,593.00 0.00 2,593.00 AP 00360189 07/15/2015 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 4,879.76 0.00 4,879.76 AP 00360190 07/15/2015 RAMIREZ,CYNTHIA 150.00 0.00 150.00 AP 00360191 07/15/2015 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 29.70 0.00 29.70 AP 00360192 07/15/2015 RICIIARDS WAISON AND GERSHON 31,933.99 0.00 31,933.99 AP 00360193 07/15/2015 RIPPETOE LAW P C 15.477.41 4,367.14 19,844.55 *"" AP 00360194 07/15/2015 121 THOMAS MFG COMPANY INC 3,035.00 0.00 3,035.00 AP 00360195 07/15/2015 ROBLES,RAUL P 405.00 0.00 405.00 AP 00360196 07/15/2015 RODRIGUEZ,MIRIAM 20.00 0.00 20.00 AP 00360197 07/15/2015 ROGERS ANDERSON MALODY&SCOTT LLP 3,937.50 0.00 3,937.50 AP 00360198 07/15/2015 ROGUE VALLEY QUAIL& FEEDER MICE INC 123.05 0.00 123.05 AP 00360199 07/15/2015 ROJER,IVAN M. 0.00 260.00 260.00 AP 00360200 07/15/2015 SAFEWAY SIGN COMPANY 815.12 0.00 815.12 AP 00360201 07/15/2015 SAN BERNARDINO CO FIRE DEPT 0.00 888.55 888.55 AP 00360202 07/15/2015 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 3,347.07 0.00 3,347.07 AP 00360203 07/15/2015 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 8,129.82 0.00 8,129.82 AP 00360204 07/15/2015 SAN BERNARDINO CTY 16,037.46 0.00 16,037.46 AP 00360205 07/15/2015 SAN BERNARDINO CTY 0.00 10,654.98 10,654.98 AP 00360206 07/15/2015 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOO 1,801.00 0.00 1,801.00 AP 00360207 07/15/2015 SC FUELS 56,224.74 6,002.49 62,227.23 •*• AP 00360208 07/15/2015 SECURITY BANK OF CALIFORNIA 0.00 1,483.31 1,483.31 AP 00360209 07/15/2015 SEVERSON PRODUCTS COMPANY 177.04 0.00 177.04 AP 00360210 07/15/2015 SHRED PROS 65.00 0.00 65.00 AP 00360211 07/15/2015 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 20,247.12 0.00 20,247.12 AP 00360212 07/15/2015 SNAWDER,DOUG 0.00 250.00 250.00 AP 00360213 07/15/2015 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 6,137.64 67.62 6,205.26••• AP 00360214 07/15/2015 SONSRAY MACHINERY LLC 4,105.10 0.00 4,105.10 AP 00360219 07/15/2015 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54,823.66 3,170.83 57,994.49*"• AP 00360220 07/15/2015 SOUTHLAND FARMERS MARKET ASSOC INC 954.00 0.00 954.00 AP 00360221 07/15/2015 SPOONFACTORY 2,732.50 0.00 2,732.50 AP 00360222 07/15/2015 STILL,RUTFI 20.00 0.00 20.00 AP 00360223 07/15/2015 STOTZ EQUIPMENT 1,190.72 0.00 1,190.72 AP 00360224 07/15/2015 SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR INC 23,486.70 0.00 23,486.70 AP 00360225 07/15/2015 SWIFTY SIGN 0.00 90.72 90.72 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 9 Current Date: 07/29/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 14:55:06 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P10 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/8/2015 through 7/28/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00360226 07/15/2015 TERRA VISTA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00360227 07/15/2015 THOMPSON PLUMBING SUPPLY 69.45 0.00 69.45 AP 00360228 07/15/2015 TINT CITY WINDOW TINTING 420.00 0.00 420.00 AP 00360229 07/15/2015 TREEIUM 90.69 0.00 90.69 AP 00360230 07/15/2015 TURNOUT MAINTENANCE COMPANY LI-C 0.00 601.32 601.32 AP 00360231 07/15/2015 ULINE 73.33 0.00 73.33 AP 00360232 07/15/2015 UNIVERSITY ENTERPRISES CORP n CSUSB,THE 7,500.00 0.00 7.500.00 AP 00360233 07/15/2015 UPS 92.37 0.00 92.37 AP 00360234 07/15/2015 VAN SCOYOC ASSOCIATES INC 4,000.00 0.00 4,000.00 AP 00360235 07/15/2015 VECCHIO.TOM 336.00 0.00 336.00 AP 00360239 07/15/2015 VERIZON WIRELESS- LA 5,348.50 0.00 5.348.50 AP 00360240 07/15/2015 VERIZON WIRELESS- LA 0.00 2,807.43 2,807.43 AP 00360241 07/15/2015 VERIZON WIRELESS- LA 494.13 0.00 494.13 AP 00360242 07/15/2015 VERIZON WIRELESS- LA 4,251.53 0.00 4,251.53 AP 00360243 07/15/2015 VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 2,341.38 0.00 2,341.38 AP 00360244 07/15/2015 VICTORIA GARDENS MALL LLC 3.100.00 0.00 3,100.00 AP 00360245 07/15/2015 VORTEX INDUSTRIES INC 0.00 1,125.42 1,125.42 AP 00360246 07/15/2015 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 14,790.83 574.54 15,365.37"' AP 00360247 07/15/2015 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 6,372.81 0.00 6,372.81 AP 00360248 07/15/2015 WEST COAST LIGHTS&SIRENS 3,313.32 0.00 3,313.32 AP 00360249 07/15/2015 WHITE HOUSE PHOTO INC 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00360250 07/15/2015 WILSON AND BELL 650.26 0.00 650.26 AP 00360251 07/15/2015 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 45.56 0.00 45.56 AP 00360252 07/15/2015 AFSS SOUTHERN DIVISION 0.00 100.00 100.00 AP 00360253 07/15/2015 AGUILERA, ISAIAH 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00360254 07/15/2015 ALLIANCE FOR INNOVATION 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 Al' 00360255 07/15/2015 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC. 4,947.20 0.00 4,947.20 AP 00360256 07/15/2015 ALLIED STORAGE CONTAINERS 0.00 75.60 75.60 AP 00360257 07/15/2015 ART IN MOTION FOR KIDS 550.00 0.00 550.00 AP 00360258 07/15/2015 BALNEG, RAFAEL 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00360259 07/15/2015 BANK OF THE WEST 424,092.22 0.00 424,092.22 AP 00360260 07/15/2015 BiCOASTAL PRODUCTIONS 3,348.00 0.00 3,348.00 AP 00360261 07/15/2015 BOPKO,CHRISTOPHER 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00360262 07/15/2015 BUENASEDA,ANTHONY KYLE 350.00 0.00 350.00 AP 00360263 07/15/2015 CALIFA LIBRARY GROUT' 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00360264 07/15/2015 CAMI'OS XCLUSIVE 1,750.00 0.00 1,750.00 AP 00360265 07/15/2015 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 301.00 0.00 301.00 AP 00360266 07/15/2015 DRAMATIC PUBLISHING 3.360.00 0.00 3,360.00 AP 00360267 07/15/2015 EBERHARDT,KIM 2,500.00 0.00 2,500.00 AP 00360268 07/15/2015 ECS IMAGING INC 2,290.00 0.00 2,290.00 AP 00360269 07/15/2015 EMBASSY SUITES SAN DIEGO BAY-DOWNTOWN 2,429.06 0.00 2,429.06 AP 00360270 07/15/2015 EMBASSY SUITES SAN DIEGO BAY-DOWNTOWN 1,088.48 0.00 1,088.48 AP 00360271 07/15/2015 EMBASSY SUITES SAN DIEGO BAY-DOWNTOWN 2,176.96 0.00 2,176.96 AP 00360272 07/15/2015 EMBASSY SUITES SAN DIEGO BAY-DOWNTOWN 1,156.03 0.00 1,156.03 AP 00360273 07/15/2015 ESKANDER,JIMMY 20.00 0.00 20.00 AP 00360274 07/15/2015 FIELDS,MICHELLE 68.00 0.00 68.00 AP 00360275 07/15/2015 GRANT III,VINCENT 400.00 0.00 400.00 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 10 Current Date: 07/29/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 14:55:06 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P11 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/8/2015 through 7/28/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00360276 07/15/2015 GRIFFITHS,VICTORIA MICHELLE 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00360277 07/15/2015 GUERRA,KELLY 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00360278 07/15/2015 HOYT LUMBER CO.,SM 0.00 34.98 34.98 AP 00360279 07/15/2015 ICMA 1,400.00 0.00 1,400.00 AP 00360280 07/15/2015 INLAND AREA PUBLIC MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION 50.00 0.00 50.00 AP 00360281 07/15/2015 IPMA-HR 673.16 0.00 673.16 AP 00360282 07/15/2015 JOHNSON,CIIEARICE 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00360283 07/15/2015 KAUFMAN,HOPE 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 AP 00360284 07/15/2015 KONG,SOPHEAK 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00360285 07/15/2015 MARRIOTT LOUISVILLE 840.34 0.00 840.34 AP 00360286 07/15/2015 MARTINEZ,VICKY 600.00 0.00 600.00 AP 00360287 07/15/2015 MSA INLAND EMPIRE/DESERT CHAPTER 45.00 0.00 45.00 AP 00360288 07/15/2015 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES 10,610.00 0.00 10,610.00 AP 00360289 07/15/2015 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL 645.00 0.00 645,00 Al' 00360290 07/15/2015 NIMAKO,SOLOMON 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00360291 07/15/2015 OMNI HOTELS& RESORTS 1,158.54 0.00 1,158.54 AP 00360292 07/15/2015 PANZINO,JASON JAMES 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00360293 07/15/2015 PARSAC 827,524.00 0.00 827,524.00 AP 00360294 07/15/2015 PEP BOYS 438.49 0.00 438.49 AP 00360295 07/15/2015 PHOENIX PRODUCERS GROUP 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00360296 07/15/2015 PHONG,LORRAINE 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00360297 07/15/2015 RAMIREZ,JOSE 3 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00360298 07/15/2015 RUBIO, RONDA 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 AP 00360299 07/15/2015 SAN BERNARDINO CTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 55,143.75 0.00 55,143.75 AP 00360300 07/15/2015 SAN BERNARDINO CTY FPO ASSOCIATION 0.00 160.00 160.00 AP 00360301 07/15/2015 SANS 7,700.00 0.00 7,700,00 AP 00360302 07/15/2015 SIRSIDYNIX 24,035.93 0.00 24,035.93 AP 00360303 07/15/2015 SOUTH COAST AQMD 0.00 467.98 467.98 AP 00360304 07/15/2015 STARR,CHERYL 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 AP 00360305 07/15/2015 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC 952.00 0.00 952.00 AP 00360306 07/15/2015 SYMPRO INC 3,933.00 0.00 3,933.00 AP 00360307 07/15/2015 TRIMMER, PATRICIA A 350.00 0.00 350.00 AP 00360308 07/15/2015 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT#6746022500 1,005.13 0.00 1,005.13 AP 00360309 07/15/2015 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT#6746022500 3,900.00 0.00 3,900.00 AP 00360310 07/15/2015 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT#6746022500 11,102.55 0.00 11,102.55 AP 00360311 07/15/2015 UNDERCOVER GIRLS,THE 1,100.00 0.00 1,100.00 AP 00360312 07/15/2015 UPS 78.74 0.00 78.74 AP 00360313 07/15/2015 US POST OFFICE 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 AP 00360314 07/15/2015 VANZANT,ANGIE 20.00 0.00 20.00 AP 00360315 07/15/2015 VENTEK INTERNATIONAL 2,070.00 0.00 2,070.00 AP 00360317 07/15/2015 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 8,300.15 706.49 9,006.64*** AP 00360318 07/15/2015 VIRTUAL PROJECT MANAGER INC 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00360319 07/15/2015 VISION COMMUNICATIONS CO 360.00 0.00 360.00 AP 00360320 07/15/2015 WILD WONDERS INC 1,300.00 0.00 1,300.00 AP 00360321 07/15/2015 WILSON,RYAN 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00360322 07/15/2015 WT.COX 6,658.63 0.00 6,658.63 AP 00360323 07/15/2015 YERO,ART 200.00 0.00 200.00 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: I I Current Date: 07/29/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 14:55:06 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P12 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/8/2015 through 7/28/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00360324 07/16/2015 ABC LOCKSMITHS 1,418.83 0.00 1,418.83 AP 00360327 07/16/2015 C V W D 37,168.80 629.20 37,798.00*** AP 00360328 07/16/2015 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 14,733.85 0.00 14,733.85 AP 00360329 07/16/2015 HYDRO SCAPE PRODUCTS INC 940.91 0.00 940.91 AP 00360330 07/16/2015 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 9,164.14 0.00 9,164.14 AP 00360331 07/16/2015 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 0.00 555.58 555.58 AP 00360332 07/16/2015 NEC CORPORATION OF AMERICA 2,712.00 0.00 2,712.00 AP 00360333 07/16/2015 PENNY PLUMBING 4,685.57 0.00 4,685.57 AP 00360334 07/16/2015 SUNRISE FORD 56.43 0.00 56.43 AP 00360335 07/16/2015 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 12,199.24 0.00 12,199.24 AP 00360336 07/16/2015 TOMARK SPORTS INC 153.10 0.00 153.10 AP 00360337 07/16/2015 VISTA PAINT 1,752.69 0.00 1,752.69 AP 00360338 07/20/2015 COSTELLO,DENNIS M 0.00 16,264.30 16,264.30 AP 00360343 07/20/2015 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION,STATE OF 4,019.42 1,619.77 5,639.19*** AP 00360344 07/22/2015 10-8 RETROFIT INC. 3,934.50 0.00 3,934.50 AP 00360345 07/22/2015 4 IMPRINT 3,000.00 0.00 3,000.00 AP 00360346 07/22/2015 AEGIS ITS INC 82,657.70 0.00 82,657.70 AP 00360347 07/22/2015 AHMED,MOSTOFA 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00360348 07/22/2015 ALBERT GROVER&ASSOCIATES 1,700.00 0.00 1,700.00 AP 00360349 07/22/2015 ALHAJRI,HAMAD 779.50 0.00 779.50 AP 00360350 07/22/2015 ALLIANCE BUS LINES INC 2,027.06 0.00 2,027.06 AP 00360351 07/22/2015 ALLIANCE BUS LINES INC 1,651.12 0.00 1,651.12 AP 00360352 07/22/2015 ALLIANCE BUS LINES INC 1,109.77 0.00 1,109.77 AP 00360353 07/22/2015 ALSYBKI,WALEED 38.43 0.00 38.43 AP 00360354 07/22/2015 ALTA PLANNING AND DESIGN 13,286.94 0.00 13,286.94 AP 00360355 07/22/2015 ARCFIITERRA DESIGN GROUP 878.75 0.00 878.75 AP 00360356 07/22/2015 ASCAP 1,350.92 0.00 1,350.92 AP 00360357 07/22/2015 AUFBAU CORPORATION 2,380.00 - 0.00 2,380.00 AP 00360358 07/22/2015 AUTO AND RV SPECIALISTS INC. 84.69 0.00 84.69 AP 00360359 07/22/2015 BAKER,EDWARD 20.00 0.00 20.00 AP 00360360 07/22/2015 BARNES AND NOBLE 2,052.48 0.00 2,052.48 AP 00360361 07/22/2015 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION,STATE OF 5,009.31 0.00 5,009.31 AP 00360362 07/22/2015 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY 142.98 0.00 142.98 AP 00360363 07/22/2015 CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL 241.11 0.00 241.11 AP 00360364 07/22/2015 CCS ORANGE COUNTY JANITORIAL INC. 280.25 0.00 280.25 AP 00360365 07/22/2015 CHILDREN'S DENTISTRY OF INLAND EMPIRE 37.76 0.00 37.76 AP 00360366 07/22/2015 CLEARWATER GRAPHICS INC 2,818.80 0.00 2,818.80 AP 00360367 07/22/2015 CONCEPTUAL SITE FURNISHINGS INC. 5,011.20 0.00 5,011.20 AP 00360368 07/22/2015 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTR INC 2,131.75 0.00 2,131.75 AP 00360369 07/22/2015 CORODATA MEDIA STORAGE INC 1,008.10 0.00 1,008.10 AP 00360370 07/22/2015 COUNTRY ESTATE FENCE CO INC 7,842.68 0.00 7,842.68 AP 00360371 07/22/2015 CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES INC 4,936.46 0.00 4,936.46 AP 00360372 07/22/2015 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 1,565.92 0.00 1,565.92 AP 00360373 07/22/2015 DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS 1,350.00 0.00 1,350.00 AP 00360374 07/22/2015 DURATECH USA INC. 3,679.12 0.00 3,679.12 AP 00360375 07/22/2015 DURKEL,CAROL 18.40 0.00 18.40 AP 00360376 07/22/2015 E POLY STAR INC. 1,819.80 0.00 1,819.80 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 12 Current Date: 07/29/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 14:55:06 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P13 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/8/2015 through 7/28/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00360377 07/22/2015 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD 67.73 0.00 67.73 AP 00360378 07/22/2015 FLEET SERVICES INC. 0.00 23.57 23.57 AP 00360379 07/22/2015 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 989.83 0.00 989.83 AP 00360380 07/22/2015 GAIL MATERIALS 1,989.24 0.00 1,989.24 AP 00360381 07/22/2015 GAO,XIANG CHENG 68.43 0.00 68.43 AP 00360382 07/22/2015 GARCIA,WESSLEY 10.05 0.00 10.05 AP 00360383 07/22/2015 GEOGRAPFIICS 36,859.56 0.00 36,859.56 AI' 00360384 07/22/2015 GOSS JR.,ROBERT 0.00 37.40 37.40 AP 00360385 07/22/2015 GRACIANO,TAMMIE 0.00 29.98 29.98 AP 00360386 07/22/2015 GRAINGER 1,745.89 0.00 1.745.89 AP 00360387 07/22/2015 GRAPHICS FACTORY INC. 199.80 0.00 199.80 Al' 00360388 07/22/2015 H&H GENERAL CONTRACTORS INC 582,292.45 0.00 582.292.45 AP 00360389 07/22/2015 HI WAY SAFETY INC 2,077.91 0.00 2,077.91 AI' 00360390 07/22/2015 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION BOARD 1,340.31 0.00 1,340.31 AI' 00360391 07/22/2015 INLAND PRESORT& MAILING SERVICES 87.34 0.00 87.34 AP 00360392 07/22/2015 INTEGRITY DOOR& HARDWARE INC 5,068.68 0.00 5,068.68 AP 00360393 07/22/2015 JENSEN,SAMANTHA 53.37 0.00 53.37 AP 00360394 07/22/2015 JOHN BURR CYCLES INC 2,121.13 0.00 2,121.13 AP 00360395 07/22/2015 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES 629.66 0.00 629.66 AP 00360396 07/22/2015 JONES AND MAYER,LAW OFFICES OF 3,120.00 0.00 3,120.00 AP 00360397 07/22/2015 K A R CONSTRUCTION 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00360398 07/22/2015 KASA CONSTRUCTION INC 5,414.13 0.00 5,414.13 AP 00360399 07/22/2015 KERSHNER,JEFFREY 62.46 0.00 62.46 AP 00360400 07/22/2015 KOZAKA,SALLY 129.00 0.00 129.00 AP 00360401 07/22/2015 LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY 2,409.22 0.00 2,409.22 AP 00360403 07/22/2015 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 6.177.64 611.82 6,789.46"' Al' 00360404 07/22/2015 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 99,958.40 4,559.98 104,518.38"' AP 00360405 07/22/2015 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 150.06 0.00 150.06 AP 00360406 07/22/2015 MD ENERGY INC 71,101.70 0.00 71,101.70 AP 00360407 07/22/2015 MEYER,BRANDEE 78.30 0.00 78.30 AP 00360408 07/22/2015 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC US INC 626.95 0.00 626.95 AP 00360409 07/22/2015 NAPA AUTO I'ARTS 3.23 0.00 3.23 AP 00360410 07/22/2015 NATIONWIDE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 728.00 0.00 728.00 AI' 00360411 07/22/2015 NICKENS,JENNIFER 52.00 0.00 52.00 AP 00360412 07/22/2015 NIMAKO,SOLOMON 109.99 0.00 109.99 AP 00360413 07/22/2015 NINYO&MOORE 6,534.75 0.00 6,534.75 AP 00360415 07/22/2015 OFFICE DEPOT 9,725.88 68.15 9,794.03 •" AP 00360416 07/22/2015 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 167.12 0.00 167.12 AP 00360417 07/22/2015 ONWARD ENGINEERING 19,720.00 0.00 19,720.00 AP 00360418 07/22/2015 PACIFIC YOUTH SPORTS 1,650.00 0.00 1,650.00 AP 00360419 07/22/2015 PARS 3.500.00 0.00 3,500.00 AP 00360420 07/22/2015 PATTIO VMD,NOLTON 600.00 0.00 600.00 AP 00360421 07/22/2015 PAVEMEN'I'RECYCLING SYSTEM 3,340.20 0.00 3,340.20 AP 00360422 07/22/2015 PITASSI ARCHITECTS INC 10,210.00 0.00 10,210.00 AP 00360423 07/22/2015 PRO SALES GROUP INC 3,654.21 0.00 3,654.21 AP 00360424 07/22/2015 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FONTANA FAMILY YMCA 7,801.38 0.00 7,801.38 AP 00360425 07/22/2015 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTOR 175.64 0.00 175.64 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 13 Current Date: 07/29/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait t Time: 14:55:06 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P14 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/8/2015 through 7/28/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00360426 07/22/2015 REGENCY ENTERPRISES INC 4,849.20 0.00 • 4,849.20 AP 00360427 07/22/2015 RENDON,LUCERO 396.00 0.00 396.00 AP 00360428 07/22/2015 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 335.00 0.00 335.00 AP 00360429 07/22/2015 ROOT,FRANK 149.54 0.00 149.54 AP 00360430 07/22/2015 S.CALIF.MUNICIPAL ATHLETIC FEDERATION , 750.00 0.00 750.00 AP 00360431 07/22/2015 SALIDO,ROSEMARY 8.10 0.00 8.10 AP 00360432 07/22/2015 SALINAS,ERICKA 68.00 0.00 68.00 AP 00360433 07/22/2015 SAMS CLUB/SYNCHRONY BANK 141.49 0.00 141.49 AP 00360434 07/22/2015 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 446.08 0.00 446.08 AP 00360435 07/22/2015 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 1,170.96 0.00 1,170.96 AP 00360436 07/22/2015 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 1,937.10 0.00 1,937.10 AP 00360437 07/22/2015 SIGMANET 17,600.00 0.00 17,600.00 AP 00360438 07/22/2015 SIGN SHOP,THE 423.36 0.00 423.36 AP 00360439 07/22/2015 SMARTLITE 150.00 0.00 150.00 AP 00360440 07/22/2015 SMITH,TANINA 29.70 0.00 29.70 AP 00360441 07/22/2015 SNAWDER,RICK 0.00 260.00 260.00 AP 00360442 07/22/2015 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 14.30 0.00 14.30 AP 00360443 07/22/2015 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,701.17 0.00 1,701.17 AP 00360446 07/22/2015 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 9,216.23 0.00 9,216.23 AP 00360447 07/22/2015 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 189,862.33 0.00 189,862.33 AP 00360448 07/22/2015 SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 230.00 0.00 230.00 AP 00360449 07/22/2015 SPARKLEFTS 78.77 0.00 78.77 AP 00360450 07/22/2015 SPECIAL SERVICE FOR GROUPS 84,992.00 0.00 84,992.00 AP 00360451 07/22/2015 STERNBERG, BRIAN 10.05 0.00 10.05 AP 00360452 07/22/2015 STOTZ EQUIPMENT 688.47 0.00 688.47 AP 00360453 07/22/2015 THOMSON REUTERS WEST PAYMENT CENTER 415.34 0.00 415.34 AP 00360454 07/22/2015 ULINE 2,662.09 0.00 2,662.09 AP 00360455 07/22/2015 UNIQUE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 1,088.88 0.00 1,088.88 AP 00360456 07/22/2015 UNITED ROTARY BRUSH CORPORATION 1,375.38 0.00 1,375.38 AP 00360457 07/22/2015 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 225.91 0.00 225.91 AP 00360458 07/22/2015 UPS 183.89 0.00 183.89 AP 00360459 07/22/2015 UPSCO POWERSAFE SYSTEMS INC 19,683.00 0.00 19,683.00 AP 00360460 07/22/2015 VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE 101,499.40 0.00 101,499.40 AP 00360461 07/22/2015 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,260.79 0.00 1,260.79 AP 00360462 07/22/2015 WHITTIER FERTILIZER 2,565.00 0.00 2,565.00 AP 00360463 07/22/2015 YERO,ART 32.37 0.00 32.37 AP 00360464 07/22/2015 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC 8,618.30 0.00 8,618.30 AP 00360465 07/22/2015 1 PLUS I TECHNOLOGY c/o US BANK N.A. 177,175.00 0.00 177,175.00 AP 00360466 07/22/2015 10-8 RETROFIT INC. 2,934.90 0.00 2,934,90 AP 00360467 07/22/2015 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 53.81 0.00 53.81 AP 00360468 07/22/2015 ACEY DECY EQUIPMENT INC. 136.50 0.00 136.50 AP 00360469 07/22/2015 ADDINGTON,MATTHEW 95.00 0.00 95.00 AP 00360470 07/22/2015 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 79.40 0.00 79.40 AP 00360471 07/22/2015 ALLDATA 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 AP 00360472 07/22/2015 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC. 285.00 0.00 285.00 AP 00360473 07/22/2015 ART OF LIVING FOUNDATION 144.00 0.00 144.00 AP 00360474 07/22/2015 BARNES AND NOBLE 63.37 0.00 63.37 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 14 Current Date: 07/29/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 14:55:06 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P15 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/8/2015 through 7/28/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00360475 07/22/2015 13LR 1,055.06 0.00 1,055.06 AP 00360476 07/22/2015 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 268.00 0.00 268.00 AP 00360477 07/22/2015 CALIFORNIA BUILDING OFFICIALS 105.00 0.00 105.00 AP 00360478 07/22/2015 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 55.00 0.00 55.00 AP 00360479 07/22/2015 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00360480 07/22/2015 CALIFORNIA LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 2,700.00 0.00 2,700.00 AP 00360481 07/22/2015 CALPERS 129,781.11 7,150.20 136,931.31 "' AP 00360482 07/22/2015 CCS ORANGE COUNTY JANITORIAL INC. 280.25 0.00 280.25 AP 00360483 07/22/2015 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 899.88 0.00 899.88 AP 00360484 07/22/2015 CIN'PAS CORP.#150 919.96 0.00 919.96 AP 00360485 07/22/2015 COLD DUCK PRODUCTIONS INC. 700.00 0.00 700.00 AP 00360486 07/22/2015 D'ANGELO,GIOVANNI 15.00 0.00 15.00 AP 00360487 07/22/2015 DAGHDEVIRIAN,KATHY 243.00 0.00 243.00 AP 00360488 07/22/2015 DCT 8111 AND VINEYARD LLC 3,256.00 0.00 3,256.00 AP 00360489 07/22/2015 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 301.00 0.00 301.00 AP 00360490 07/22/2015 DREAM SHAPERS 275.00 0.00 275.00 AP 00360491 07/22/2015 EIGHTH AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC 417.74 0.00 417.74 AP 00360492 07/22/2015 ERGON ASPHALT AND EMULSIONS 198.98 0.00 198.98 AP 00360493 07/22/2015 FAI RA 0.00 87,772.00 87,772.00 AP 00360494 07/22/2015 FIORE,MEGAN 95.00 0.00 95.00 AP 00360495 07/22/2015 GALI:/CENGAGE LEARNING 20,908.78 0.00 20,908.78 AP 00360496 07/22/2015 GOLDEN STATE RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY 112,008.00 1,127.00 113,135.00*** AP 00360497 07/22/2015 GONSALVES AND SON,JOE A 3,000.00 0.00 3,000.00 AP 00360498 07/22/2015 GRAINGER 501.32 0.00 501.32 AP 00360499 07/22/2015 1111,LS,CORY 424.00 0.00 424.00 AP 00360500 07/22/2015 INFOGROUP 11,600.00 0.00 11,600.00 AP 00360501 07/22/2015 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY GROUP 1,579.65 0.00 1,579.65 AP 00360502 07/22/2015 INLAND VALLEY COUNCIL OF CHURCHES 1,325.00 0.00 1,325.00 AP 00360503 07/22/2015 JOHNNY ALLEN TENNIS ACADEMY 4,235.40 0.00 4,235.40 AP 00360504 07/22/2015 K K WOODWORKING 3,952.48 0.00 3.952.48 AP 00360505 07/22/2015 LEON, LYDIA 80.00 0.00 80.00 AP 00360506 07/22/2015 LIBRARY IDEAS I.LC 19,055.00 0.00 19,055.00 AP 00360507 07/22/2015 MEINEKE CAR CARE CENTER 900.55 0.00 900.55 AP 00360508 07/22/2015 MMASC 95.00 0.00 95.00 AP 00360509 07/22/2015 MOORE PHOTOGRAPHY 205.20 0.00 205.20 AP 00360510 07/22/2015 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 3.78 0.00 3.78 AP 00360511 07/22/2015 MUSICSTAR 2,786.40 0.00 2,786.40 AP 00360512 07/22/2015 NEWSBANK INC 7,140.00 0.00 7,140.00 AP 00360513 07/22/2015 PAL CAMPAIGN 10.00 0.00 10.00 AP 00360514 07/22/2015 PEP BOYS 155.48 0.00 155.48 AP 00360515 07/22/2015 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 84.24 0.00 84.24 AP 00360516 07/22/2015 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 203.58 0.00 203.58 AP 00360517 07/22/2015 ROBLES, RAUL P 105.00 0.00 105.00 AP 00360518 07/22/2015 ROSLOF, BEN 28.92 0.00 28.92 AP 00360519 07/22/2015 SBPEA 1,062.04 0.00 1,062.04 AP 00360520 07/22/2015 SEXTON,SHEILA 6.00 0.00 6.00 AP 00360521 07/22/2015 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 491.65 0.00 491.65 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 15 Current Date: 07/29/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait 1 Time: 14:55:06 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P16 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/8/2015 through 7/28/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00360522 07/22/2015 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 150.00 0.00 150.00 AP 00360523 07/22/2015 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 93.38 0.00 93.38 AP 00360524 07/22/2015 SHOWCASES 401.76 0.00 401.76 AP 00360525 07/22/2015 TAIKO CENTER OF LOS ANGELES 2,000.00 0.00 2,000.00 AP 00360526 07/22/2015 'I'ESSIER,JEAN YVES 2,500.00 0.00 2,500.00 Al' 00360527 07/22/2015 TORO TOWING 275.00 0.00 275.00 AP 00360528 07/22/2015 UNI'T'ED WAY 157.00 0.00 157.00 AP 00360529 07/22/2015 UPS 51.16 0.00 51.16 AP 00360530 07/22/2015 Verizon 38.12 0.00 38.12 AP 00360531 07/22/2015 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 4,778.01 0.00 4,778.01 AP 00360532 07/22/2015 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 1,786.22 1,229.27 3,015.49 s" AP 00360533 07/22/2015 VICK, LINDA 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 AP 00360534 07/22/2015 VISION SERVICE PLAN CA 10,865.44 0.00 10,865.44 AP 00360535 07/22/2015 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 3,270.90 0.00 3,270.90 AP 00360536 07/22/2015 WELLS,ERIC 0.00 60.00 60.00 AP 00360537 07/22/2015 WHITTEN, MONIA 99.00 0.00 99.00 Al' 00360538 07/22/2015 XTREME DETAILING 375.00 0.00 375.00 Al' 00360539 07/22/2015 ZERITZKE,JOHN 2,000.00 0.00 2,000.00 AP 00360540 07/22/2015 Z0110 CORPORATION 1,848.00 0.00 1,848.00 Al' 00360541 07/23/2015 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 200.20 0.00 200,20 AP 00360542 07/23/2015 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 200.20 0.00 200.20 AP 00360543 07/23/2015 HEMAUER.PAUL 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00360544 07/23/2015 ABC LOCKSMITHS 2.283.74 0.00 2,283.74 AP 00360545 07/23/2015 AGILINE LLC 3.600,00 0.00 3.600.00 AP 00360546 07/23/2015 AIRGAS USA LLC 0.00 654.23 654.23 AP 00360547 07/23/2015 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 1,782.45 0.00 1,782.45 AP 00360551 07/23/2015 C V W D 128,029.96 696.78 128,726.74 *** AP 00360552 07/23/2015 CALSENSE 3,139.58 0.00 3,139.58 AP 00360553 07/23/2015 COMP U ZONE 752.78 0.00 752.78 AP 00360554 07/23/2015 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON CO INC 792.48 6,000.00 6,792.48* * AP 00360555 07/23/2015 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 1,161.31 0.00 1,161.31 Al' 00360556 07/23/2015 EMCOR SERVICE 64,904.79 0.00 64,904.79 AP 00360557 07/23/2015 EN POINTE TECHNOLOGIES SALES INC 45,071.84 0.00 45.071.84 AP 00360558 07/23/2015 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 2,155.23 0.00 2,155.23 AP 00360559 07/23/2015 FASTENAL COMPANY 612.09 0.00 612.09 AP 00360560 07/23/2015 HYDRO SCAPE PRODUCTS INC 1,845.81 0.00 1,845.81 AP 00360561 07/23/2015 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 2,500.00 0.00 2,500.00 AP 00360562 07/23/2015 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 745.54 0.00 745.54 AI' 00360563 07/23/2015 LANDCARE 57,870.64 0.00 57,870.64 AP 00360564 07/23/2015 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 1,620.66 0.00 1,620.66 AP 00360565 07/28/2015 BELL,MICHAEL L. 0.00 1,560.49 1.560,49 AP 00360566 07/28/2015 LONCAR,PHILIP 0.00 920.36 920.36 AP 00360567 07/28/2015 'I'OWNSEND,JAMES 0.00 1,560.49 1.560.49 AP 00360568 07/28/2015 WALKER.KENNETH 0.00 246.76 246.76 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 16 Current Date: 07/29/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait t Time: 14:55:06 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P17 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/8/2015 through 7/28/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount Total City: $8,619,063.96 Total Fire: $519,754.76 Grand Total: $9,138,818.72 Note: *** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 17 Current Date: 07/29/2015 Report CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 14:55:06 P18 STAFF REPORT • V� RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT L RANCHO Date: August 5, 2015 CUCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mike Costello, Fire Chief By: Brian Fallon, Fire Captain Pamela Pane, Management Analyst III Subject: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE SINGLE SOURCE PURCHASE OF FIFTY-FOUR (54) SELF-CONTAINED BREATHING APPARATUS (SCBAs) AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, IN KEEPING WITH THE CONTINUITY OF THE SCBAs RECEIVED FROM THE 2013 ASSISTANCE TO FIREFIGHTERS GRANT (AFG) FROM THE REGIONAL AWARD RECEIVED BY ONTARIO FIRE DEPARTMENT, FROM BAUER COMPRESSORS, OF LIVERMORE, CA, IN THE AMOUNT OF $369,823.41 TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 3288501-5290. • RECOMMENDATION Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (District) staff recommends approval of the single source purchase of fifty-four (54) Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBAs) and associated equipment, in keeping with the continuity of the SCBAs received from the 2013 Assistance to Firefighters Grant (AFG) from the regional award received by Ontario Fire Department, from Bauer Compressors, in the amount of $369,823.41, to be funded from Account Number 3288501-5290. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City of Ontario Fire Department applied for a regional grant through the 2013 Assistance to Firefighters Grant (AFG) from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the Department of Homeland Security (DNS). Four West End Fire Agencies were included in the grant request: Ontario, Montclair, Rancho Cucamonga and Upland. The request was for new SCBAs to replace aging and outdated equipment. The four fire agencies partnered together to bring the project to fruition, with the Ontario Fire Department coordinating the grant administration. The District received sixty-one (61) SCBAs through the grant. The typical life of SCBA apparatus is 15 years, including its associated components (high pressure cylinder tank, pressure regulator, face mask). The District's existing equipment has reached its expiration. It is the intent of the District to provide its personnel with the most up-to-date, and National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2013 approved, equipment to perform fire suppression activities. SCBAs are one of the P19 APPROVE THE SINGLE SOURCE PURCHASE OF FIFTY-FOUR(54)SELF-CONTAINED BREATHING APPARATUS(SCBAS)AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT,IN KEEPING WITH THE CONTINUITY OF THE SCBAs RECEIVED FROM THE 2013 ASSISTANCE TO FIREFIGHTERS GRANT (AFG), FROM BAUER COMPRESSORS AUGUST 5,2015 most essential devices which firefighters rely on to provide breathable air in an emergency situation. The District currently has one hundred fifteen (115) SCBA packs, two hundred twenty- three (223) — 20-minute cylinders and eight (8) — 60-minute cylinders. The grant only covered the SCBA equipment that directly covers the seated positions — meaning only the seats that firefighters are staffed. This additional purchase will complete 100% replacement of the District's entire outdated SCBA equipment cache. The District has been utilizing Bauer Compressors for maintenance of the AFG awarded SCBAs and would continue to utilize Bauer Compressors for continuity and efficiency. Bauer Compressors maintenance program ensures the longevity of the equipment. Bauer Compressors is a direct vendor for breathing apparatus and is the original manufacturer that meets the specialized needs of the District. Respectfully submitted, Mike Costello Fire Chief CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P20 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/8/2015 through 7/28/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00005349 07/08/2015 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEI3A/RANC11O CUCAMONGA 9,320.00 0.00 9,320.00 AP 00005350 07/08/2015 RCCEA 1.328.00 0.00 1.328.00 AP 00005351 07/08/2015 RCI'FA 10,44956 0.00 10,449.56 AP 00005352 07/08/2015 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 2535.785.07 0.00 2.535,785.07 AP 00005353 07/082015 EXELON GENERATION CO. LI.C. 313.993.92 0.00 313,993.92 AP 00005354 07/08/2015 PEEK. LINDA V 15,000.00 0.00 15,000.00 AP 00005355 07/08/2015 SHELI.ENERGY NORT I I AMERICA 17520.00 0.00 17520.00 AP 00005356 07/15/2015 FORTISPAR METHANE GROUP LI.0 106.516.17 0.00 106516.17 AP 00005357 07/15/2015 MICIIAEL.I.. DENNIS 68.25 0.00 68.25 AP 00005358 07/I52015 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 21.00 0.00 21.00 AP 00005359 07/15/2015 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC POWER AUTHORITY 493.88 0.00 493.88 AP 00005360 07/15/2015 RIVERSIDE CITY OF 6294.00 0.00 6294.00 AP 00005361 07/15/2015 VIASYN INC 1,640.00 0.00 1,640.00 AP 00005363 07/22/2015 CHAFFEY JOINT UNION 115 DISTRICT 578.52 0.00 578.52 AP 00005364 07/22/2015 VIASYN INC 2.305.35 0.00 2.305.35 AP 00005366 07/22/2015 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCIIO CUCAMONGA 9,320.00 0.00 9,320.00 AP 00005367 07/22/2015 RCCEA 1.304.00 0.00 1.304.00 AP 00005368 07/22/2015 RCI'FA 10,474.56 0.00 10,474.56 AP 00005369 07/28/2015 Al IUMADA,ALEXANDER R 0.00 904.08 904.08 AP 00005370 07/28/2015 ALMAND. LLOYD 0.00 615.52 615.52 AP 00005371 07/28/2015 I3ANFAU,VICTORIA 0.00 893.87 893.87 AP 00005372 07/28/2015 BAZAL,SUSAN 0.00 1,323.48 1,323.48 AP 00005373 07/28/2015 BERRY.DAVID 0.00 920.36 920.36 AP 00005374 07/28/2015 BROCK. ROBIN 0.00 893.87 893.87 AP 00005375 07/28/2015 CAMPBELL,GERALD 0.00 1.233.07 1,233.07 AP 00005376 07/28/2015 CARNES. KENNEFII 0.00 469.02 469.02 AP 00005377 07/28/2015 CLABI3Y,RICHARD 0.00 920.36 920.36 AP 00005378 07/28/2015 CORCORAN.ROBERT 0.00 525.11 - 525.11 AP 00005379 07/28/2015 COX, KARL. 0.00 615.52 615.52 AP 00005380 07/28/2015 CRANE,RALI'1 I 0.00 1,323.48 1,323.48 AP 00005381 07/28/2015 CROSSLAND, WILB11R 0.00 469.02 469.02 AP 00005382 07/28/2015 DAGUE,JAMES 0.00 1.172.22 1,17222 AP 00005383 07/28/2015 DE ANTONIO, SUSAN 0.00 525.11 525.11 AP 00005384 07/28/2015 DEANS,JACKIE 0.00 600.74 600.74 AP 00005385 07/28/2015 DOMINICK,SAMUEL A. 0.00 893.87 893.87 AP 00005386 07/28/2015 EAGI,ESON. MICHAEL 0.00 1,172.22 1,172.22 AP 00005387 07/28/2015 FRI'I'CI1EY,JOHN D. 0.00 469.02 469.02 AP 00005388 07/28/2015 I IEYDE,DONALD 0.00 1,17222 1,172.22 AP 00005389 07/28/2015 INFERLICCHIA, ROSALYN 0.00 1,172.22 1,17222 Al' 00005390 07/28/2015 KILMER.STEPHEN 0.00 1.233.07 1,233.07 AP 00005391 07/28/2015 LANE,WILLIAM 0.00 1.560.49 1,560.49 Al' 00005392 07/28/2015 LEE.ALLAN 1. 0.00 1.066.80 1.066.80 AP 00005393 07/28/2015 LENZE. PAL .E 0.00 1,224.46 1.224.46 AP 00005394 07/28/2015 LONGO,JOE 0.00 173.51 173.51 AP 00005395 07/28/2015 LUTFRULL. DARREL!. 0.00 694.69 694.69 AP 00005396 07/28/2015 MACKALL.BENJAMIN 0.00 173.51 173.51 AP 00005397 07/28/2015 HAYFIELD,RON 0.00 1,323.48 1,323.48 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 1 Current Date: 07/29/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 14:55:06 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P21 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/8/2015 through 7/28/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City lire Amount AP 00005398 07/28/2015 MCKEE,JOHN 0.00 615.52 615.52 AP 00005399 07/28/2015 MCMILLEN, LINDA 0.00 246.76 246.76 AP 00005400 07/28/2015 MCNEIL, KENNETH 0.00 615.52 615.52 AP 00005401 07/28/2015 MICI IAEL.L.DENNIS 0.00 893.87 893.87 AP 00005402 07/28/2015 MORGAN. 13Y1KON 0.00 2.277.23 2.277.23 AP 00005403 07/28/2015 MYSKOW,DENNIS 0.00 920.36 920.36 AI' 00005404 07/28/2015 NAUMAN, MICHAEL 0.00 920.36 920.36 AP 00005405 07/28/2015 NEE,RON 0.00 1.757.12 1,757.12 AP 00005406 07/28/2015 NELSON. MARY JANE 0.00 17351 173.51 AP 00005407 07/28/2015 PLOUNG.MICHAEL J 0.00 556.94 556.94 AP 00005408 07/28/2015 POST,MICI IAEL R 0.00 1.577.31 1.577.31 Al' 00005409 07/28/2015 PROULX.PATRICK 0.00 1,560.49 1.560.49 AP 00005410 07/28/2015 ROEDER,JEFF 0.00 1,172.22 1.172.22 Al' 00005411 07/28/2015 SALISBURY,'II IOMAS 0.00 893.87 893.87 AP 00005412 07/28/2015 SMITH. RONALD 0.00 920.36 920.36 AP 00005413 07/28/2015 SPAGNOLO.SAM 0.00 469.02 469.02 AP 00005414 07/28/2015 SPAIN, WILLIAM 0.00 694.69 694.69 AP 00005415 07/28/2015 SULLIVAN,JAMES 0.00 753.31 753.31 AP 00005416 07/28/2015 TAYLOR.STEVE 0.00 1,224.46 1.224.46 AP 00005417 07/28/2015 TULEY.TERRY 0.00 1,172.22 1.172.22 AP 00005418 0728/2015 VANDERKALLEN. FRANCIS 0.00 1.192.64 1.192.64 AP 00005419 07/28/2015 WALTON_KEVIN 0.00 1.233.07 1233.07 AP 00005420 07/28/2015 YOWELL.'I'IMOI'lIY A 0.00 1.323.48 1.323.48 AP 00359858 07/08/2015 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 79.40 0.00 79.40 Al' 00359859 07/08/2015 BRODART BOOKS 5.248.80 0.00 5.248.80 AP 00359860 07/08/2015 BUILDING BLOCK ENTERTAINMENT INC 1.450.00 0.00 1.450.00 Al' 00359861 07/08/2015 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 268.00 0.00 268.00 AP 00359862 07/08/2015 CALIFORNIA FRANCIIISE TAN BOARD 55.00 0.00 _ • 55.00 Al' 00359863 07/08/2015 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE.TAX BOARD 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00359864 07/08/2015 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL TREASURERS ASSOCIATIOT` 235.00 0.00 235.00 Al' 00359865 07/08/2015 CALPELRA 1,020.00 0.00 1,020.00 AP 00359866 07/08/2015 CLARK.NICHOLAS 700.00 0.00 700.00 AP 00359867 07/08/2015 COOPER,TIFFANY 136.28 0.00 136.28 AP 00359868 07/08/2015 DAIGI I.SANDRA CASI'I,EBERRY 624.00 0.00 624.00 AP 00359869 07/08/2015 DE LA ROSA, DIEGO 800.00 0.00 800.00 AP 00359870 07/08/2015 DELTA DENTAL 1,578.76 0.00 1.578.76 AP 00359871 07/08/2015 DELTA DENI'AI.. 40.665.78 0.00 40,665.78 AP 00359872 07/08/2015 DUPPER, PHILLIP 700.00 0.00 700.00 AP 00359873 07/08/2015 FOLKENS, KIM 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00359874 07/08/2015 GOLDEN STATE RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORI'T'Y 117,110.00 1,127.00 118,237.00*** AP 00359875 07/08/2015 INDIGO, HOTEL 1.740.54 0.00 1.740.54 AP 00359876 07/08/2015 INDIGO, HOTEL 1,740.54 0.00 1.740.54 AP 00359877 07/08/2015 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 201.052.21 0.00 201.052.21 AP 00359878 07/08/2015 PAL CAMPAIGN 10.00 0.00 10.00 AP 00359879 07/08/2015 PITNEY BOWES 15,000.01) 0.00 15,000.00 AP 00359880 07/08/2015 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 84.24 0.00 84.24 AP 00359881 07/08/2015 PYRO SPECTACULARS INC 13,000.00 0.00 13,000.00 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 2 Current Date: 07/29/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I. Time: 14:55:06 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P22 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/8/2015 through 7/28/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00359882 07/08/2015 RAYENHARTZ, DAVID 700.00 0.00 700.00 AP 00359883 07/08/2015 SAN BERNARDINO CTY REAL ESTATE SVCS DEPT 9,166.00 0.00 9.166.00 AP 00359884 07/08/2015 SBPEA 1.086.80 0.00 1.086.80 AP 00359885 07/08/2015 SEXTON.SHEILA 6.00 0.00 6.00 AP 00359886 07/08/2015 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 93.38 0.00 93.38 AP 00359887 07/08/2015 SI IERIFFS COURT SERVICES 150.00 0.00 150.00 AP 00359888 07/08/2015 SI IERIFFS COURT SERVICES 491.65 0.00 491.65 AP 00359889 07/08/2015 SIGN SHOP,THE 298.84 0.00 298.84 AP 00359890 07/08/2015 SOUSA.NARCIE 700.00 0.00 700.00 AP 00359891 07/08/2015 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 216.15 0.00 216.15 AP 00359892 07/08/2015 UNITED WAY 159.00 0.00 159.00 AP 00359894 07/08/2015 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 6.632.18 1.818.74 8.450.92*** AP 00359895 07/08/2015 WESIIN PLAZA SAN DIEGO.TI 1E 8.611.72 0.00 8.611.72 AP 00359896 07/08/2015 WOMEN LEADING GOVERNMENT 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00359897 07/08/2015 WYNDIIAM SAN DIEGO I3AYSIDE 372.22 0.00 372.22 AP 00359898 07/08/2015 ZAPATA.ALEX 700.00 0.00 700.00 AP 00359899 07/08/2015 I2-MARTIN AU'T'O COLOR INC. 511.26 0.00 511.26 AP 00359900 07/08/2015 ARV SOFTBALL 3564.00 0.00 3.564.00 AP 00359901 07/08/2015 A'JON'IUE. ROSE ANN 275.80 0.00 275.80 AP 00359902 07/08/2015 ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 7,742.01 0.00 7.742.01 AP 00359903 07/08/2015 ACEY DECY EQUIPMENT INC. 219.38 0.00 • 219.38 AP 00359904 07/08/2015 ACTION AWARDS INC. 119.08 0.00 119.08 AP 00359905 07/08/2015 ADAGE DANCE CENTER 1,000.00 0.00 1.000.00 Al' 00359906 07/08/2015 ADAPT CONSULTING INC 1,896.60 0.00 1.896.60 Al' 00359907 07/08/2015 AD SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 15.137.50 0.00 15.137.50 AP 00359908 07/08/2015 ALI3ERTOS MEXICAN POOR 231.83 0.00 231.83 AI' 00359909 07/08/2015 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC. 4,372.00 0.00 4,372.00 - • AI' 00359910 07/08/2015 ALLIED BARTON SECURITY SERVICES L.L.0 2,579.60 0.00 2.579,60 • AP 00359911 07/08/2015 ALPI IAGRAPI TICS 66.15 0.00 66.15 AP 00359912 07/08/2015 AMTECII ELEVATOR SERVICES 268.26 0.00 268.26 AP 00359913 07/08/2015 ARTISTIC RESOURCES CORPORATION 6,077.34 0.00 6,077.34 Al' 00359914 07/08/2015 AUFBAU CORPORATION 19,362.00 0.00 19,362.00 AP 00359915 07/08/2015 BAR STEERING HYDRAULICS INC 0.00 5.208.32 5,208.32 AP 00359916 07/08/2015 BANK OF AMERICA MERRILL LYNCH 0.00 85,672.81 85,672.81 AP 00359917 07/08/2015 I3IBLIOTHECA ITG 1.704.00 0.00 1,704.00 AP 00359918 07/08/2015 BISHOP COMPANY 980.29 0.00 980.29 AP 00359919 07/08/2015 CA131.E INC. 1,012.37 0.00 1,012.37 AP 00359920 07/08/2015 CALIFORNIA DIVISION OP'I'I'IE STATE ARCI IITECT 923.70 0.00 923.70 AP 00359921 07/08/2015 CALLACI.ALLEN 39,94 0.00 39.94 AP 00359922 07/08/2015 CARPENTER. DEBORA 153.00 0.00 153.00 AP 00359923 07/08/2015 CARTY. DIANE 550.80 0.00 550.80 AP 00359924 07/08/2015 CCS ORANGE COUNTY JANITORIAL INC. 2,992.00 0.00 2.992.00 AP 00359925 07/08/2015 CIIARTER COMMUNICATIONS 0.00 524.88 524.88 AP 00359926 07/08/2015 CHINO MOWER AND ENGINE SERVICE 30.83 0.00 30.83 AP 00359927 07/08/2015 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 2,742.77 0.00 2.742.77 AP 00359928 07/08/2015 CLOUGIIESY, DONALD 0.00 53.77 53.77 AP 00359929 07/08/2015 COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF S.13. 160.62 0.00 160.62 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 3 Current Date: 07/29/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 14:55:06 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P23 AND . RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/8/2015 through 7/28/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00359930 07/08/2015 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTR INC 387.72 0.00 387.72 AP 00359931 07/08/2015 COOPER,TIFFANY 146.89 0.00 146.89 AP 00359932 07/08/2015 COSTAR REAL FY INFORMATION INC 308.25 0.00 308.25 AP 00359933 07/08/2015 CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES INC 3,602.30 0.00 3.602.30 AP 00359934 07/08/2015 D'ANGEI.O,JULIANA 75.00 0.00 75.00 AP 00359935 07/08/2015 DANCE TERRIFIC 1,157.80 0.00 1.157.80 AP 00359936 07/08/2015 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION 12.346.02 0.00 12,346.02 AP 00359937 07/08/2015 DIAMOND IN THE ROUGH 480.60 0.00 480.60 AP 00359938 07/08/2015 DICKINSON JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 328.32 0.00 328.32 AP 00359939 07/08/2015 DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT,THE 9,412.80 0.00 9,412.80 AP 00359940 07/08/2015 DURKEL,CAROL 256.46 0.00 256.46 AP 00359941 07/08/2015 EDWARD PROFESSIONAL.ADVISIORS 900.00 0.00 900.00 AP 00359942 07/08/2015 GARCIA,PEFRA 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00359943 07/08/2015 GEOGRAPHICS 872.20 0.00 872.20 AP 00359944 07/08/2015 GONZALES,ANTOINEITE 32.20 0.00 32.20 AI' 00359945 07/08/2015 GRAGG.MARY LOU 135.08 0.00 135.08 AP 00359946 07/08/2015 GRAINGER 843.26 0.00 843.26 AP 00359947 (17/08/2015 GRAYBAR 569.40 0.00 569.40 AP 00359948 07/08/2015 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 540.00 0.00 540.00 AP 00359949 07/08/2015 HAM RADIO OUTLET 0.00 1,527.81 1,527.81 AP 00359950 07/08/2015 HATANAKA_MARGARET 10.05 0.00 10.05 AP 00359951 07/08/2015 HAW'I'FIORNE LIFT SYSTEMS 483.03 0.00 483.03 AP 00359952 07/08/2015 HI WAY SAFETY INC 9,987.95 0.00 9,987.95 AP 00359953 07/08/2015 IIMC ARCHITECTS 0.00 115.810.18 115.810.18 AP 00359954 07/08/2013 IIOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 645 529.29 0.00 529.29 AP 00359955 07/08/2015 HOT SIIOTS ATHLETIC APPAREL INC. 11.618.35 0.00 11,618.35 AI' 00359956 07/08/2015 HOYT LUMBER CO.,SM 0.00 6.10 6.10 • AP 00359957 07/08/2015 IDEAL GRAPHICS - 453.60 0.00 453.60 AP 00359959 07/08/2015 INLAND EMPIRE PROPERTY SERVICES INC 0.00 13,62750 13,627.50 . AP 00359960 07/08/2015 INLAND VALLEY DANCE ACADEMY 1,575.00 0.00 1,575.00 AP 00359961 07/08/2015 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES 1,576.64 0.00 1,576.64 AP 00359962 07/08/2015 JOHNNY ALI,EN TENNIS ACADEMY 499.80 0.00 499.80 AP 00359963 07/08/2015 JONES AND MAYER,LAW OFFICES OF 12,928.00 0.00 12,928.00 AP 00359964 07/08/2015 112C HOUSING 4,690.00 0.00 4,690.00 AP 00359965 07/08/2015 KAROUSEI.KIDS INC 12,355.00 0.00 12,355.00 AP 00359966 07/08/2015 KOZAKA.SALLY 129.00 0.00 129.00 AP 00359967 07/08/2015 KWEE.DARREN 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 AP 00359968 07/08/2015 LAVISHED PRINTING INC 348.30 0.00 348.30 AP 00359969 07/08/2015 LEW EDWARDS GROUP,THE 5,750.00 0.00 5,750.00 AP 00359970 07/08/2015 LORBEL INC 20,507.47 0.00 20,507.47 AP 00359971 07/08/2015 LOS ANGELES FREIGHTLINER 3.96255 0.00 ' 3,962.55 AP 00359972 07/08/2015 LOZANO,ALEXIS 555.00 0.00 555.00 AP 00359973 07/08/2015 MAGNUM ELECTRONICS INC 0.00 3.140.00 3,140.00 AP 00359974 07/08/2015 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 9,544.34 0.00 9,544.34 AP 00359975 07/08/2015 MARTINEZ TOWING 45.00 0.00 45.00 AP 00359976 07/08/2015 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 254.70 0.00 254.70 AP 00359977 07/08/2015 MERCADO, ROBERT 47.00 0.00 47.00 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 4 Current Date: 07/29/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 14:55:06 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P24 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/8/2015 through 7/28/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount Al' 00359978 07/08/2015 MERCURY DISPOSAL SYSTEMS INC 813.76 0.00 813.76 Al' 00359979 07/08/2015 MIDWEST TAPE 325.00 0.00 325.00 Al' 00359980 07/08/2015 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 3,418.00 0.00 3.418.00 Al' 00359981 07/08/2015 MINUTEMAN PRESS 280.80 0.00 280.80 AP 00359982 07/08/2015 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 2,177.92 0.00 2,177.92 AP 00359983 07/08/2015 MPND MOLDINGS. LLC 5.000,00 0.00 5,000.00 AP 00359984 07/08/2015 MUSICSTAR 2,903.20 0.00 290320 Al' 00359985 07/08/2015 MYERS TIRE SUPPLY 0.00 270.85 270.85 AP 00359986 07/08/2015 NBS 320.00 0.00 320.00 AP 00359987 07/08/2015 NEWCOMB ANDERSON MCCORMICK INC 1.717.47 1.144.99 2.862.46 "* AP 00359988 07/08/2015 OFFICE DEPOT 1,921.45 0.00 1,921.45 AP 00359989 07/08/2015 OKOYE FOUNDA'T'ION 400.00 0.00 400.00 Al' 00359990 07/08/2015 PACIFIC MUNICII'AI.CONSULTANTS 10,307.50 0.00 10,307.50 Al' 00359991 07/08/2015 PACIFIC YOU'I'I I SPORTS 540.00 0.00 540.00 AP 00359992 07/08/2015 PATTON SALES CORP 56.99 0.00 56.99 AI' 00359993 07/08/2015 PEPSI-COLA 175.45 0.00 175.45 AP 00359994 07/08/2015 PRECISION GYMNASTICS 3.366.30 0.00 3,366.30 Al' 00359995 07/08/2015 PRO-PLANET INDUSTRIAL-SUPPLY 1,191.89 0.00 1.191,89 Al' 00359996 07/08/2015 PW GILI-II3RAND INC 3.535.83 0.00 3535.83 Al' 00359997 07/08/2015 RANCHO CUCAMONGA QUAKES 7.412.00 0.00 7,412.00 AP 00359998 07/08/2015 REGENCY ENTERPRISES INC 1.263.60 0.00 1.263.60 Al' 00359999 07/08/2015 RICIIARDS WATSON AND GERSI ION 0.00 8.180.00 8,180.00 AP 00360000 07/08/2015 RJM DESIGN GROIJI'INC 1.314.25 - 0.00 1.314.25 AP 00360001 07/08/2015 ROBERTS.CHERYL I. 0.00 63.75 63.75 Al' 00360002 07/08/2015 ROBINSON. RA NE 28.18 0.00 28.18 Al' 00360003 07/0820/5 SAN BERNARDINO CI'Y OFFICE OF TI IE ASSESSOR 840.00 0.00 840.00 AI' 0036000-! 07/0820/5 SAN BERNARDINO.CITY OF 957.22 0.00 957.22 Al' 00360005 07/08/2015 SANCHEZ,CARMEN 51.80 0.00 51.80 AP 0(1360006 07/08/2015 SHRED IT 402.55 0.00 402.55 AP 00360(107 07/08/2015 SIEMENS INDUS'T'RY INC 35.869.12 0.00 35,869.12 AI' 00360008 07/08/2015 SIEMENS INDUS'T'RY INC 11996.51 0.00 11,996.51 Al' 00360009 07/08/2015 SIGN SI101'.TI IE 188.68 0.00 188.68 Al' 00360010 07/08/2015 SIRSIDYNIX 26.440.00 0.00 26.440.00 AP 00360011 07/08/2015 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 4,110.75 222.04 4.332.79'" AP 00360012 07/08/2015 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 3.080.00 0.00 3.080.00 AP 00360015 07/08/2015 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27,286.55 1.128,79 28,415.34 "" AP 00360016 07/08/2015 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1.098,76 0.00 1,098.76 N' 00360017 07/08/2015 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,200.41 0.00 2.200.41 Al' 00360018 07/08/2015 SOU'ITIERN CALIFORNIA LIBRARY COOPERATIVE 1.200.00 0.00 1.200.00 Al' 00360019 07/08/2015 SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 460.00 0.00 460.00 Al' 00360020 07/08/2015 SOUTHWEST TRAFFIC SYSTEMS INC 4,474.00 0.00 4.47400 AP 00360021 07/08/2015 STA'T'EWIDE TRAFFIC SAFETY&SIGNS INC 115.24 0.00 115.24 AI' 00360022 07/08/2015 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 1,401.18 0.00 1,401.18 AP 00360023 07/08/2015 STOTZ EQUIPMENT 62.63 0.00 62.63 AP 00360024 07/08/2015 STOVER SEED COMPANY 1,144.80 0.00 1,144.80 AP 00360025 07/08/2015 'I'ELLEZ,TONY 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00360026 07/08/2015 THOMPSON PLUMBING SUPPLY 820.80 0.00 820.80 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 5 Current Date: 07/29/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED- CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 14:55:06 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P25 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/8/2015 through 7/28/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00360027 07/08/2015 TONG. WENDY Y 2500.00 0.00 2,500.00 Al' 00360028 07/08/2015 TRUMMELL.ANGELICA 10.05 0.00 10.05 AP 00360029 07/08/2015 UNIVERSITY ENTERPRISES CORD /,v CSUSB.THE 3.750.00 0.00 3,750.00 Al' 00360030 07/08/2015 UPSCO POWERSAFE SYSTEMS INC 5,700.00 0.00 5.700.00 Al' 00360031 07/08/2015 UTILI QUEST 6.744.00 0.00 6,744.00 AP 00360032 07/08/2015 VALDEZ.T'RINA • 98.00 0.00 98.00 Al' 00360033 07/08/2015 VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE 3,697.19 0.00 3.697.19 Al' 00360034 07/08/2015 VALVERDE SCHOOL OF PERFORMING ARTS 18.150.76 0.00 18,150.76 Al' 00360035 07/08/2015 VENTURA,MIKE 324.00 0.00 324.00 AP 00360036 07/08/2015 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 10.21 0.00 10.21 AP 00360037 07/08/2015 VERIZON WIRELESS- LA 233.06 0.00 233.06 Al' 00360038 07/08/2015 VERIZON WIRELESS- LA 60.12 0.00 60.12 AP 00360039 07/08/2015 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 2,165.60 39.90 2,205.50*** Al' 00360040 07/08/2015 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 7.248.96 0,00 7,248.96 Al' 00360041 07/08/2015 WESTLAND GROUT' INC 4.222.50 (1.00 4.222.50 AP 00360042 07/08/2015 WILLIAMS ARCHITECTS INC 16.069.00 0.00 16.069.00 AP 00360043 07/08/2015 WRIGI IT,TINA 78.00 0.00 78.00 AP 00360044 07/08/2015 WRIGHT-EVANS, MELONIE 33.00 0.00 33.00 AP 00360045 07/09/2015 LISPS 3509.45 0.00 3509.45 AI' 00360046 07/09/2015 ABC LOCKSMIIIis 1.058.33 0.00 1.058.33 AP 00360047 07/09/2015 AIRGAS USA LI,C 175.33 0.00 175.33 Al' 00360048 07/09/2015 BRK POWER TO SOLVE 2,257.20 0.00 2.257.20 AP 00360052 07/09/2015 BRODART BOOKS 10,931.68 0.00 10,931.68 AP 00360055 07/09/2015 C V W I) 45.353.82 0.00 45,353.82 Al' 0(1360056 07/09/2015 COLTON SURVEYING INSTRUMENTS 137.95 0.00 137.95 AP 00360057 07/09/2015 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 27.09 0.00 27.09 Al' 00360058 07/09/2015 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 150.06 0.00 150.06 AP 00360059 07/09/2015 • F012D OF UPLAND INC .50.91 0.00 50.91 Al' 00360060 07/09/2015 IIOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 3.321.75 0.00 3.321.75 AP 00360061 07/09/2015 HYDRO SCAPE PRODUCES INC 576.07 0.00 576.07 AP 00360062 07/09/2015 INTERSTATE BM-FERIES 9,166.61 745.54 9-912.15 *** Al' 00360063 07/09/2015 KME FIRE APPARATUS 0.00 799.13 799.13 Al' 00360064 07/09/2015 LIMS AUTO INC 4.259.90 0.00 4.259,90 Al' 00360065 07/09/2015 NEC CORPORATION OF AMERICA 2,494.35 0.00 2,494.35 AP 00360066 07/09/2015 QUICK CRETE PRODUCES 1,845.73 0.00 1,845.73 AP 00360067 07/09/2015 SUNSTA'I?EQUIPMENT COMPANY LLC 1,232.22 0.00 1,232.22 Al' 00360068 07/09/2015 'TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 1,910.69 0.00 1,910.69 AP 00360069 07/09/2015 'TOMARK SPOR'T'S INC 1,747.84 0.00 1.747.84 AP 00360070 07/09/2015 LANDCARE 2,059.47 0.00 2.059.47 AP 00360071 07/15/2015 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 309.48 0.00 309.48 AP 00360072 07/15/2015 A CONE ZONE INC. 942.84 0.00 942.84 AP 00360073 07/15/2015 ARV SOFTBALL 1.863.00 0.00 1,863.00 AP 00360074 07/15/2015 AARDVARK 0.00 2.988.57 2,988.57 AP 00360075 07/15/2015 AED BRANDS 0.00 3,450.00 3,450.00 AP 00360076 07/15/2015 AEI-CASC CONSULTING 1.204.13 0.00 1,204.13 Al' 00360077 07/15/2015 ALL CITIES TOOLS 0.00 2.138.40 2.138.40 AI' 00360078 07/15/2015 ALLIANCE BUS LINES INC 1,849.62 0.00 1,849.62 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 6 Current Date: 07/29/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 14:55:06 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P26 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/8/2015 through 7/28/2015 Check No. Check Date N'cndor Name City Fire Amount AP 00360079 07/15/2015 ALLIANCE BUS LINES INC 754.88 0.00 754.88 AP 00360080 07/15/2015 ALLIANCE BUS LINES INC 2,117.21 0.00 2.117.21 AP 00360081 07/15/2015 ALLIANCE BUS LINES INC 639.60 0.00 639.60 AP 00360082 07/15/2015 ALLIED BARTON SECURITY SERVICES LLC 20.802.87 0.00 20.802.87 Al' 00360083 07/15/2015 AI.1'HAGRAPHICS 390.80 0.00• 390.80 AI' 00360084 07/I5/2015 AL:TA LOMA ANIMAL I.IOSPITAL 950.00 0.00 950.00 Al' 00360085 07/15/2015 ALTA PLANNING AND DESIGN 9.233.74 0.00 9,233.74 AI' 00360086 07/15/2015 AMLON INDUSTRIES INC. 3,445.20 0.00 3,445 20 AP 00360087 07/15/2015 ANIMAL HEALTH &SANI'T'ARY SUPPLY 388.80 0.00 388.80 AP 00360088 07/15/2015 ARTISTIC RESOURCES CORPORATION 6.199.45 0.00 6,199.45 Al' 00360089 07/15/2015 ASSI SECURITY 10.874.20 0.00 10.87420 Al' 00360090 07/15/2015 AT&T MOBILITY 0.00 83.48 83.48 AP 00360091 07/15/2015 BANK OP AMERICA MERRILL LYNCH 0.00 28.182.97 28.182.97 AP 00360092 07/15/2015 BARRON,LAURA 70.09 0.00 70.09 AP 00360093 07/15/2015 BERTINO AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE 172.17 0.00 172.17 Al' 00360094 07/15/2015 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC. 0.00 2,413.91 2,413.91 AP 00360095 07/15/2015 CABRAI. ROOFING AND WATERPROOFING 353.76 0.00 353.76 Al' 00360096 07/15/2015 CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL 1,099.71 0.00 1.099.71 AP 00360097 07/15/2015 CCS ORANGE COUNTY JANI'I'ORIAI.INC. 0.00 371.85 371.85 AP 00360098 07/15/2015 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 229.58 0.00 229.58 Al' 00360099 07/15/2015 CINEVATIVE 12,543.45 0.00 12543.45 AP 00360100 07/15/2015 CINTAS CORP.11150 1,145.19 0.00 1,145.19 Al' 00360101 07/15/2015 CLARK SELF CLARK INC. 2.085,60 0.00 2.085.60 Al' 00360102 07/15/2015 CLARK,KAREN 1,382.40 0.00 1.382.40 AP 00360103 07/15/2015 CLEARWATER GRAPHICS INC 502.20 0.00 502.20 AI' 00360104 07/15/2015 COST RECOVERY SYSTEMS INC 10,000.00 0.00 10,000.00 AI' 00360105 07/15/2015 I)& I)SERVICES INC. 430.00 0.00 430.00 Al' 00360106 07/15/2015 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 1.209.60 • 0.00 1,209.60 AI' 00360107 07/15/2015 DEER CREEK CAR WASH 1,021.50 0.00 1.02150 Al' 00360108 07/I5/2015 DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION 0.00 108.00 108.00 AP 00360109 07/15/2015 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 258.62 0.00 258.62 AP 00360110 07/15/2015 DISASTER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS INC. 0.00 680.11 680.11 AP 00360111 07/15/2015 DUMBELI.MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT.THE 356.00 0.00 356.00 Al' 00360112 07/15/2015 DUNN. ANN MARIE 925.50 0.011 925.50 • AP 00360113 07/15/2015 DURATECH USA INC. 260.49 0.00 260.49 AI' 00360114 07/15/2015 EIGHTI I AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC 258.12 0.00 258.12 Al' 00360115 07/15/2015 ENTERSECT CORP 79.00 0.00 79.00 Al' 00360116 07/15/2015 EXPERIAN 52.24 0.00 52.24 AP 00360117 07/15/2015 FLEET SERVICES INC. 0.00 1.522.80 1,522.80 AP 00360118 07/15/2015 FREEDOM NEWS GROUP 22.343.80 0.00 22,343.80 AI' 00360119 07/15/2015 FRITTS FORD 154.54 0.00 15454 Al' 00360120 07/15/2015 FRS ENVIRONMENTAL 291.54 .0.00 291.54 AI' 00360121 07/15/2015 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 6,214.82 0.00 6,214.82 AI' 00360122 07/15/2015 GIORDANO,MARIANNA 171.00 0.00 171.00 AP 00360123 07/15/2015 GLOBALSTAR 74.66 0.00 74.66 AP 00360124 07/15/2015 GOLDEN OPENINGS INC. 297.50 0.00 297.50 AP 00360125 07/15/2015 GOODYEAR TIRE AND RUBBER CO. 8,554.81 0.00 8.554.81 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ_ Page: 7 Current Date: 07/29/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED- CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait L "Dime: 14:55:06 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P27 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/8/2015 through 7/28/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00360126 07/15/2015 GRAGG,MARY LOU 1,872.15 0.00 1.872.15 AP 00360127 07/15/2015 GRAINGER 3,368.85 198.00 3,566.85 *4* AP 00360128 07/15/2015 GRAPHICS FACTORY INC. 2,234.73 0.00 2.234.73 AP 00360129 07/15/2015 HALO BRANDED SOLU'T'IONS 2,535.84 0.00 2,535.84 Al' 00360130 07/15/2015 HAWES,STEPHANIE 18.00 0.00 18.00 AP 00360131 07/15/2015 HAWTHORNE LIFT SYSTEMS 31.10 0.00 31.10 AP 00360132 07/15/2015 HEARTSAVERS I.I.0 0.00 20.00 20.00 AP 00360133 07/15/2015 HI WAY SAFETY INC 27.00 0.00 27.00 AP 00360134 07/15/2015 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 3,115.97 0.00 3.115.97 Al' 00360135 07/15/2015 HOME DEI'O'I'CREDIT SERVICES 645 161.16 0.00 161.16 Al' 00360136 07/15/2015 IIOYT LUMBER CO.. SM 0.00 45.12 45.12 Al' 00360137 07/15/2015 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY IN' 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00360138 07/15/2015 IMPEIT.VICTORIA ANN 566.13 0.00 566.13 AP 00360139 07/15/2015 INLAND EMPIRE'POURS AND TRANSPOR'T'ATION 2.105.50 0.00 2,105.50 Al' 00360140 07/15/2015 INLAND VALLEY DANCE ACADEMY 558.00 0.00 558.00 AP 00360141 07/15/2015 INLAND VALLEY EMERGENCY PET CLINIC 58.50 0.00 58.50 AP 00360142 07/15/2015 INLAND VALLEY RV SERVICE&SUPPLIES 396.60 0.00 396.60 Al' 00360143 07/15/2015 INTEGRITY DOOR& HARDWARE INC 1.468.60 0.00 1.468.60 AP 00360144 07/15/2015 INTERACTIVE DATA CORPORATION 231.04 0.00 231.04 AP 00360145 07/15/2015 INTERNATIONAL LINE BUILDERS INC 72,064.54 0.00 72.064.54 Al' 00360146 07/15/2015 IN'T'ERNA'T'IONAL LINE BUILDERS INC 26.777.20 0.00 26,777.20 AP 00360147 07/15/2015 1 AND S STRIPING CO INC 2.277.00 0.00 2,277.00 AP 00360148 07/15/2015 JONES AND MAYER. LAW OFFICES OF 8.128.00 0.00 8.128.00 AP 00360149 07/15/2015 JRC 110USING 1,230.00 0.00 1,230.00 AP 00360150 07/15/2015 I.E II AND ASSOCIATES 39.800.00 0.00 39.800.00 AP 00360151 07/15/2015 LAKESHORE LEARNING MA'T'ERIALS 272.38 0.00 272.38 Al' 00360152 07/15/2015 LIFE ASSIST INC 0.00 173.76 173.76 AI' 00360153 07/15/2015 LOS ANGELES FREIGIIITINER 51.03 0.00. 51.03 Al' 00360154 07/15/2015 MAIN SI'RETI'SIGNS 470.77 0,00 470.77 Al' 00360155 07/15/2015 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 2913.20 0.00 2.913.20 Al' 00360156 07/15/2015 MARK CHRISTOPHER INC 607.15 0.00 607.15 AI' 00360157 07/15/2015 MC AVOY& MARKI TAM 3,513.24 0.00 3,513.24 AP 00360158 07/15/2015 MCI 32.12 0.00 32.12 Al' 00360159 07/15/2015 hiCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 727.07 0.00 727.07 AP 00360160 07/15/2015 MEDLEY FIRE PROTECTION INC 8,400.00 7.174.41 15574.41 """ AP 00360161 07/15/2015 MEINEKE CAR CARE CENTER 792.45 0.00 792.45 AP 00360162 07/15/2015 MERCADO, ROBERT 47.00 0.00 47.00 Al' 00360163 07/15/2015 MGT OF AMERICA INC 1,500.00 0.00 1.500.00 Al' 00360164 07/15/2015 MIDWEST TAPE 2,474.79 0.00 2474.79 Al' 00360165 07/15/2015 MILANES,YIKCIA 1,112.50 0.00 1.112.50 Al' 00360166 07/15/2015 MING 110 CONS'T'RUC'T'ION 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 Al' 00360167 07/15/2015 MOST DEPENDABLE FOUNTAINS INC 4,776.00 0.00 4,776.00 AP 00360168 07/15/2015 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 241.16 0.00 241.16 AP 00360169 07/15/2015 NEW COLOR SCREEN PRINTING& EMBROIDERY 336.96 0.00 336.96 AP 00360170 07/15/2015 NINYO& MOORE 24,130.75 0.00 24.130.75 AP 00360171 07/15/2015 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH C'I'RS OF CA 1,148.00 101.00 1.249.00"*" AP 00360172 07/15/2015 OCLC INC 50.45 0.00 50.45 User: VLOPEZ_ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 8 Current Date: 07/29/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait t Time: 14:55:06 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P28 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/8/2015 through 7/28/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount Al' 00360174 07/15/2015 OFFICE DEPOT 10.729.17 314.83 11.044.00"' AI' 00360176 07/15/2015 ONTARIO SPAY AND NEUTER INC 2.025.00 0.00 2.025.00 AP 00360177 07/15/2015 OPARC 352.00 0.00 352.00 AP 00360178 07/15/2015 PARKES, DR KEVIN 0.00 12,000.00 12,000.00 Al' 00360179 07/15/2015 PERERA, MICHELLE. 24.55 0.00 24.55 AP 00360180 07/15/2015 PITES ROAD SERVICE INC • 1,134.26 0.00 1,134.26 Al' 00360181 07/15/2015 PIMENTEL. IRENE 40.00 0.00 40.00 AP 00360182 07/15/2015 PIONEER MANUFACTURING 3,505.68 0.00 3.505.68 AP 00360183 07/15/2015 POWELL,SCOTT 60.00 0.00 60.00 AI' 00360184 07/15/2015 PRINTERS.THE 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00360185 07/15/2015 PRO SALES GROUP INC 3.123.04 0.00 3.123.04 AP 00360186 07/15/2015 PRO SPRAY EQUIPMENT 870.20 0.00 870.20 AP 00360187 07/15/2015 PROVO ENGINEERING 0.00 250.00 250.00 Al' 00360188 07/15/2015 PUMP MAN INC 2,593.00 0.00 2,593.00 AP 00360189 07/15/2015 R AND R AUTOMO'T'IVE 4.879.76 0.00 4.879.76 Al' 00360190 07/15/2015 RAMIREZ,CYN'T'HIA 150.00 0.00 150.00 AI' 00360191 07/15/2015 REM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 29.70 0.00 29.70 Al' 00360192 07/15/2015 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 31.933.99 0.00 31.933.99 AP 00360193 07/15/2015 RIPPETOE LAW P C 15.477.41 4,367.14 19.844.55 "` AP 00360194 07/15/2015 RJ THOMAS MFG COMPANY INC 3.035.00 0.00 3,035.00 Al' 00360195 07/15/2015 ROBLES. RAUL P 405.00 0.00 405.00 Al' 00360196 07/15/2015 RODRIGUEZ, MIRIAM 20.00 0.00 20.00 AI' 00360197 07/15/2015 ROGERS ANDERSON MALODY& SCOFF ELI' 3,937.50 0.00 3.937.5t) Al' 00360198 07/15/2015 ROGUE VALLEY QUAIL&FEEDER MICE INC 123.05 0.00 123.05 Al' 00360199 07/15/2015 ROJER. IVAN M. 0.00 260.00 260.00 Al' 00360200 07/15/2015 SAFEWAY SIGN COMPANY 815.12 0.00 815.12 Al' 00360201 07/15/2015 SAN BERNARDINO CO FIRE DEPT 0.00 888.55 888.55 • AP 00360202 07/15/2015 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 3,347.07 0.00 3,347.07 AP 00360203 07/15/2015 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 8,129.82 0.00 8.129.82 AP 00360204 07/15/2015 SAN BERNARDINO CTY 16.037.46 0.00 16.037.46 AP 00360205 07/15/2015 SAN BERNARDINO CI'Y 0.00 10.654.98 10,654.98 AI' 00360206 07/15/2015 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOO 1.801.00 0.00 1,801.00 Al' 00360207 07/15/2015 SC FUELS 56,224.74 6,002.49 62.227.23 "" Al' 00360208 07/15/2015 SECURITY BANK OF CALIFORNIA 0.00 1,483.31 1,483.31 AP 00360209 07/15/2015 SEVERSON PRODUCT'S COMPANY 177.04 0.00 177.04 AP 00360210 07/15/2015 SHRED PROS 65.00 0.00 65.00 AP 00360211 07/15/2015 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 20.247.12 0.00 20.247.12 Al' 00360212 07/15/2015 SNAWDER,DOUG 0.00 250.00 250.00 Al' 00360213 07/15/2015 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 6,137.64 67.62 6,205.26"` AP 00360214 07/15/2015 SONSRAY MACHINERY LLC 4,105.10 0.00 4,105.10 Al' 00360219 07/15/2015 SOU'T'HERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54,823.66 3,170.83 57,994.49`"' Al' 00360220 07/I5/2015 SOUTHLAND FARMERS MARKET ASSOC INC 954.00 0.00 954.00 AP 00360221 07/15/2015 SPOONFACTORY 2.732.50 0.00 2,732.50 Al' 00360222 07/15/2015 STILL, RUTH 20.00 0.00 20.00 AP 00360223 07/15/2015 STOTZ EQUIPMENT 1.190.72 0.00 1.190.72 Al' 00360224 07/15/2015 SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR INC 23.486.70 0.00 23.486.70 AP 00360225 07/15/2015 SWIFTY SIGN 0.00 90.72 90.72 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 9 Current Date: 07/29/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait L Time: 14:55:06 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P29 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/8/2015 through 7/28/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount Al' 00360226 07/15/2015 TERRA VISTA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 0.00 100.00 AI' 00360227 07/15/2015 THOMPSON PLUMBING SUPPLY 69.45 0.00 69.45 AP 00360228 07/15/2015 TINT CITY WINDOW TINTING 420.00 0.00 420.00 Al' 00360229 07/15/2015 TREEIUM 90.69 0.00 90.69 AP 00360230 07/15/2015 TURNOUT MAINTENANCE COMPANY LLC 0.00 601.32 601.32 Al' 00360231 07/15/2015 ULINE 73.33 0.00 73.33 Al' 00360232 07/15/2015 UNIVERSITY ENTERPRISES CORP g CSUSI3,TILE 7.500.00 0.00 7.500.00 AI' 00360233 07/15/2015 UPS 92.37 0.00 92.37 AP 00360234 07/15/2015 VAN SCOYOC ASSOCIATES INC 4,000.00 0.00 4,000.00 Al' 00360235 07/15/2015 VECCHIO.TOM 336.00 0.00 336.00 AP 00360239 07/15/2015 VERIZON WIRELESS- LA 5.348.50 0.00 5.348.50 Al' 00360240 07/15/2015 VERIZON WIRELESS- LA 0.00 2.807,43 2,807.43 Al' 00360241 07/15/2015 VERIZON WIRELESS- LA 494.13 0.00 494.13 AP 00360242 07/15/2015 VERIZON WIRELESS- 1..A 4.251.53 0.00 4.251.53 AP 00360243 07/15/2015 VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 2,341.38 0.00 2,341.38 Al' 00360244 07/15/2015 VICTORIA GARDENS MAIL TLC 3.100.00 0.00 3,100.00 Al' 00360245 07/15/2015 VORTEX INDUSTRIES INC 0.00 1,125.42 1.125.42 Al' 00360246 07/15/2015 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 14.790.83 574.54 15.365.37"* AP 00360247 07/15/2015 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 6.372.81 0.00 6.372.81 AI' 00360248 07/15/2015 WEST COAST LIGHTS&SIRENS 3.313.32 0.00 3,313.32 AP 00360249 07/15/2015 WRITE HOUSE PI10T0 INC 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00360250 07/15/2015 WILSON AND BELL 650.26 0.00 650.26 AP 00360251 07/15/2015 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 45.56 0.00 45.56 AP 00360252 07/15/2015 NESS SOUTIIERN DIVISION 0.00 100.00 100.00 Al' 00360253 07/15/2015 AGUILERA. ISAIAH 400.00 0.00 400.00 Al' 00360254 07/15/2015 AI,LIANCE FOR INNOVATION 5.000.00 0.00 5.000.00 Al' 00360255 07/15/2015 AI.LIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC. 4.947.20 0.00 4,947.20 AP '00360256 07/15/2015 ALLIED STORAGE CON'T'AINERS 0.00 75.60 75.60 . Al' 00360257 07/15/2015 ART IN MOTION FOR KIDS 550.00 0.00 550.00 AP 00360258 07/15/2015 BALNEG.RAFAEL 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00360259 07/15/2015 BANK OF THE WEST 424.092.22 0.00 424.092.22 AP 00360260 07/15/2015 BiCOASTAL PRODUCTIONS 3,348.00 0.00 3.348,00 Al' 00360261 07/15/2015 BOPKO,CHRISTOPIiER 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00360262 07/15/2015 13UENASEDA,ANTHONY KYI.E 350.00 0.00 350.00 Al' 00360263 07/15/2015 CA I.IFA LIBRARY GROUP 400.00 0.00 . 400.00 AP 00360264 07/15/2015 CAMPOS XCLUSIVE 1,750.00 0.00 1.750.00 AP 00360265 07/15/2015 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 301.00 0.00 301.00 AP 00360266 07/15/2015 DRAMATIC PUBLISHING 3.360.00 0.00 3,360.00 AP 00360267 07/15/2015 I BERHARDT. KIM 2,500.00 0.00 2500.00 AP 00360268 07/15/2015 ECS IMAGING INC 2,290.00 0.00 2,290.00 AP 00360269 07/15/2015 EMBASSY SUITES SAN DIEGO BAY-DOWNTOWN 2,429.06 0.00 2,429.06 AP 00360270 07/15/2015 EMBASSY SUITES SAN DIEGO BAY-DOWN'T'OWN 1,088.48 0.00 1,088.48 AP 00360271 07/15/2015 EMBASSY SUITES SAN DIEGO BAY-DOWNTOWN 2.176.96 0.00 2,176.96 Al' 00360272 07/15/2015 EMBASSY SUITES SAN DIEGO BAY-DOWN'T'OWN 1,156.03 0.00 1.156.03 AP 00360273 07/15/2015 ESKANDER.JIMMY 20.00 0.00 20.00 AP 00360274 07/15/2015 FIELDS.MICHELLE 68.00 0.00 68.00 Al' 00360275 07/15/2015 GRANT III, VINCENT 400.00 0.00 400.00 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 10 Current Date: 07/29/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED- CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 14:55:06 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P30 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/8/2015 through 7/28/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount Al' 00360276 07/15/2015 GRIFFITFIS,VICTORIA MICHELLE 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00360277 07/15/2015 GUERRA, KELLY 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00360278 07/15/2015 HOYT LUMBER CO..SM 0.00 34.98 34.98 Al' 00360279 07/15/2015 ICMA 1,400.00 0.00 1,400.00 Al' 00360280 07/15/2015 INLAND AREA PUBLIC MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION 50.00 0.00 50.00 Al' 00360281 07/1520/5 II'MA-HR 673.16 0.00 673.16 AP 00360282 07/15/2015 JOHNSON,Cl IEARICE 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00360283 07/15/2015 KAUFMAN, HOPE 1,000.00 0.00 1.000.00 Al' 00360284 07/15/2015 KONG,SOI'IIEAK 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00360285 07/15/2015 MARRIOTT LOUISVILLE 840.34 0.00 840.34 Al' 00360286 07/15/2015 MARTINEZ, VICKY 600.00 0.00 600.00 AI' 00360287 07/15/2015 MSA INLAND EMPIRE/DESERT CHAPTER 45.00 0.00 45.00 Al' 00360288 07/15/2015 NATIONAI.LEAGUE OF CITIES 10.610.00 0.00 10,610.00 Al' 00360289 07/15/2015 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL 645.00 0.00 645.00 Al' 00360290 07/15/2015 NIMAKO,SOLOMON 400.00 0.00 400.00 Al' 00360291 07/15/2015 OMNI FIO"TILLS& RESORTS 1.158.54 0.00 1.15854 AP 00360292 07/15/2015 I'ANZINO.JASON JAMES 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00360293 07/15/2015 I'ARSAC 827.524.00 0.00 827524,00 Al' 00360294 07/15/2015 PEP BOYS 438.49 0.00 438.49 AP 00360295 07/15/2015 PHOENIX PRODUCERS GROUP 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00360296 07/15/2015 ['HONG,LORRAINE 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00360297 07/15/2015 RAMIREZ.JOSE J 200.00 0.00 200.00 Al' 00360298 07/15/2015 RUBIO. RONDA 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 AP 00360299 07/15/2015 SAN BERNARDINO GIN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 55.143.75 0.00 55.143.75 AP 00360300 07/15/2015 SAN BERNARDINO CIY FPO ASSOCIATION 0.00 160.00 160.00 AP 00360301 07/15/2015 SANS 7.700.00 0.00 7,700.00 AI' 00360302 07/15/2015 SIRSIDYNIX 24.035.93 0.00 24.035.93 AP 00360303 07/15/2015 SOUTH COAST AQMD 0.00 467.98 467.98 Al' 00360304 07/15/2015 S'I'ARR.CHERYI, 1.500.00 0.00 1.500.00 Al' 00360305 07/15/2015 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC 952.00 0.00 952.00 AI' 00360306 07/15/2015 SYMI'RO INC 3,933.00 0.00 3.933.00 AI' 00360307 07/15/2015 TRIMMER, PATRICIA A 350.00 0.00 350.00 AP 00360308 07/15/2015 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT#6746022500 1,005.13 0.00 1.005.13 AP 00360309 07/15/2015 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT#6746022500 3.900.00 0.00 3.900.00 Al' 00360310 07/15/2015 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT#6746022500 11,102.55 0.00 11.102.55 AP 00360311 07/15/2015 UNDERCOVER GIRLS,THE 1.100.00 0.00 1.100.00 AP 00360312 07/15/2015 UI'S 78.74 0.00 78.74 Al' 00360313 07/15/2015 US I'OS'I'OFFICE 1.500.00 0.00 1500.00 AP 00360314 07/15/2015 VANZANT,ANGIE 20.00 0.00 20.00 Al' 00360315 07/15/2015 VENTEK INTERNATIONAL 2,070.00 0.00 2,070.00 Al' 00360317 07/15/2015 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 8,300.15 706.49 9,006.64 *** AP 00360318 07/15/2015 VIRTUAI.I'ROJECT MANAGER INC 500.00 0.00 500.00 Al' 00360319 07/15/2015 VISION COMMUNICATIONS CO 360.00 0.00 360.00 AP 00360320 07/15/2015 WILD WONDERS INC 1,300.00 0.00 1,300.00 AP 00360321 07/15/2015 WILSON. RYAN 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00360322 07/15/2015 WT.COX 6.658.63 0.00 6.658.63 Al' 00360323 07/15/2015 YERO.ART 200.00 0.00 200.00 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: I I Current Date: 07/29/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED- CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 14:55:06 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P31 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register • 7/8/2015 through 7/28/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00360324 07/16/2015 ABC LOCKSMI'T'HS 1,418.83 0.00 1,418.83 AP 00360327 07/16/2015 C V W D 37,168.80 629.20 37,798.00*** AP 00360328 07/16/2015 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 14,733.85 0.00 14,733.85 AP 00360329 07/16/2015 HYDRO SCAPE PRODUCTS INC 940.91 0.00 940.91 AP 00360330 07/16/2015 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 9,164.14 0.00 9,164.14 AI' 00360331 07/16/2015 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 0.00 555.58 555.58 AP 00360332 07/16/2015 NEC CORPORATION OF AMERICA 2.712.00 0.00 2.712.00 AP 00360333 07/16/2015 PENNY PLUMBING 4.68557 0.00 4.68557 AP 00360334 07/16/2015 SUNRISE FORD 56.43 0.00 56.43 AP 00360335 07/16/2015 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 12.199.24 0.00 12,199.24 AP 00360336 07/16/2015 TOMARK SPORTS INC 153.10 0.00 153.10 AI' 00360337 07/16/2015 VISTA PAINT 1,752.69 0.00 1,752.69 AP 00360338 07/20/2015 COSI'EL1.O, DENNIS M 0.00 16.264.30 16264.30 AP 00360343 07/20/2015 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION,SI'A'I'IL OF 4,019.42 1.619.77 5,639.19*** Al' 00360344 07/22/2015 10-8 RETROFIT INC. 3.934.50 0.00 3,934.50 AP 00360345 07/22/2015 4 IMPRINT 3.000.00 0.00 3,000.00 AP 00360346 07/22/2015 AEGIS ITS INC 82.657.70 0.00 82.657.70 AP 00360347 07/22/2015 AHMED,MOSIOFA 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00360348 07/22/2015 ALBERT GROVER& ASSOCIATES 1.700.00 0.00 1,700.00 AP 00360349 07/22/2015 ALHAJR1.IIAMAD 779.50 0.00 779.50 Al' 00360350 07/22/2015 ALLIANCE BUS LINES INC 2.027.06 0.00 2.027.06 AP 00360351 07/22/2015 ALLIANCE BUS LINES INC 1.651.12 0.00 1.651.12 AP 00360352 07/22/2015 ALLIANCE BUS LINES INC 1,109.77 0.00 1.109.77 Al' 00360353 07/22/2015 ALSYBKI. WAI.EED 38.43 0.00 38.43 Al' 00360354 07/22/2015 ALTA PLANNING AND DESIGN 13,286.94 0.00 13,286.94 AP 00360355 07/22/2015 ARCI IITERRA DESIGN GROUT' 878.75 0.00 878.75 AP 00360356 07/22/2015 ASCAI' 1.350.92 0.00 1.350.92 AP 00360357 •07/22/2015 AUFBAU CORPORATION - 2.380.00 0.00 2,380.00 Al' 00360358 07/22/2015 AUTO AND RV SPECIALISTS INC. 84.69 0.00 84.69 AP 00360359 07/22/2015 BAKER. EDWARD 20.00 0.00 20.00 AP 00360360 07/2220/5 BARNES AND NOBLE 2,052.48 0.00 2,052.48 AP 00360361 07/22/2015 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION,STATE OF 5.009.31 0.00 5,009.31 Al' 00360362 07/22/2015 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY 142.98 0.00 142.98 AP 00360363 07/22/2015 CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL 241.11 0.00 241.11 Al' 00360364 07/2220/5 CCS ORANGE COUNTY JANITORIAL INC. 280.25 0.00 280.25 AP 00360365 07/22/2015 CHILDREN'S DENTISTRY OF INLAND EMPIRE 37.76 0.00 37.76 AP 00360366 07/22/2015 CLEARWATER GRAPHICS INC 2.818.80 0.00 2,818.80 Al' 00360367 07/22/2015 CONCEPTUAL.SI'Z'E FURNISHINGS INC. 5,01120 0.00 5,011.20 AP 00360368 07/22/2015 CONSOLIDA'T'ED ELECTRICAL DISTR INC 2,131.75 0.00 2,131.75 AP 00360369 07/22/2015 CORODATA MEDIA STORAGE INC 1,008.10 0.00 1,008.10 AP 00360370 07/22/2015 COUNTRY ESTATE FENCE CO INC 7.842.68 0.00 7,842.68 AP 00360371 07/22/2015 CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES INC 4,936.46 0.00 4.936.46 AP 00360372 07/22/2015 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 1565.92 0.00 1,565.92 AP 00360373 07/22/2015 DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS 1.350.00 0.00 1.350.00 AP 00360374 07/22/2015 DURA'FECH USA INC. 3,679.12 0.00 3,679.12 Al' 00360375 07/22/2015 DURKEL,CAROL 18.40 0.00 18.40 Al' 00360376 07/22/2015 E POLY STAR INC. 1,819,80 0.00 1,819.80 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 12 Current Date: 07/29/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED- CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 14:55:06 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P32 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/8/2015 through 7/28/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AI' 00360377 07/22/2015 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 67.73 0.00 67.73 AP 00360378 07/22/2015 FLEET SERVICES INC. 0.00 23.57 23.57 AP 00360379 07/22/2015 0 AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 989.83 0.00 989.83 AP 00360380 07/22/2015 GAIL MATERIALS 1.989.24 0.00 1,989.24 Al' 00360381 07/22/2015 GAO, XIANG CHENG 68.43 0.00 68.43 AP 00360382 07/22/2015 GARCIA, WESSLEY 10.05 0.00 10.05 AP 00360383 07/22/2015 GEOGRAPHICS 36.859.56 0.00 36.859.56 AP 00360384 07/22/2015 GOSS JR.,ROBERT 0.00 37.40 37.40 AP 00360385 07/22/2015 GRACIANO,TAMMIE 0.00 29.98 29.98 AP 00360386 07/22/2015 GRAINGER 1,745.89 0.00 1,745.89 Al' 00360387 07/22/2015 GRAPHICS FACTORY INC. 199.80 0.00 199.80 AP 00360388 07/22/2015 I I & II GENERAL CONTRACTORS INC 582.292.45 0.00 582,292.45 • AP 00360389 07/22/2015 HI WAY SAFETY INC 2,077.91 0.00 2,077.91 AP 00360390 07/22/2015 INLAND FAIR ROUSING AND MEDIA'T'ION BOARD 1.340.31 0.00 1,340.31 Al' 00360391 07/22/2015 INLAND PRESORT& MAILING SERVICES 87.34 0.00 87.34 Al' 00360392 07/22/2015 INTEGRI'T'Y DOOR& HARDWARE INC 5,068.68 0.00 5,068.68 Al' 00360393 0722/20/5 JENSEN,SAMANTHA 53.37 0.00 53.37 AP 00360394 07/22/2015 JOHN BURR CYCLES INC 2,121.13 0.00 2.121.13 AP 00360395 07/22/2015 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES 629.66 0.00 629.66 AP 00360396 07/22/2015 JONES AND MAYER,LAW OFFICES OF 3,120.00 0.00 3.120.00 Al' 00360397 07/22/2015 K A R CONSTRUCTION 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00360398 07/22/2015 KASA CONSTRUCTION INC 5,414.13 0.00 5.414.13 AP 00360399 07/22/2015 KERSHNER,JEFFREY 62.46 0.00 62.46 AP 00360400 07/22/2015 KOZAKA.SALLY 129.00 0.00 129.00 AP 00360401 07/22/2015 I.II3ERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY 2,409.22 0.00 2.409.22 AI' 00360403 07/22/2015 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 6,177.64 611.82 6.789.46"" AP 00360404 07/22/2015 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 99,958.411 4.559.98 104518.38'" AP 00360405 07/22/2015 • MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY • 150.06 0.00 150.06 AP 00360406 07/22/2015 MD ENERGY INC 71,101.70 0.00 71.101.70 AP 00360407 07/22/2015 MEYER.BRANDEE 78.30 0.00 78.30 AP 00360408 07/22/2015 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC US INC 626.95 0.00 626.95 AP 00360409 07/22/2015 NAPA AUTO('ARTS 3.23 0.00 3.23 AP 00360410 07/22/2015 NATIONWIDE ENVIRONMEN'T'AL SERVICES 728.00 0.00 728.00 Al' 00360411 07/22/2015 NICKENS,JENNIFER 52.00 0.00 52.00 AP 00360412 07/22/2015 NIMAKO,SOLOMON 109.99 0.00 109.99 AP 00360413 07/22/2015 NINYO& MOORE 6,534.75 0.00 6,534.75 AP 00360415 07/22/2015 OFFICE DEPOT 9,725.88 68.15 9,794.03 "* AP 00360416 07/22/2015 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 167.12 0.00 167.12 AP 00360417 07/22/2015 ONWARD ENGINEERING 19.720.00 0.00 19,720.00 AP 00360418 07/22/2015 PACIFIC YOUTI I SPORTS 1.650.00 0.00 1,650.00 AP 00360419 07/22/2015 PARS 3,500.00 0.00 3,500.00 AP 00360420 07/22/2015 PATI'IO VMD,NOT:TON 600.00 0.00 600.00 AP 00360421 07/22/2015 PAVEMENT RECYCLING SYSTEM 3,340.20 0.00 3.340.20 AP 00360422 07/22/2015 PITASSI ARCHITECTS INC 10,210.00 0.00 10,210.00 AP 00360423 07/22/2015 PRO SALES GROUP INC 3,654.21 0.00 3,654.21 AP 00360424 07/22/2015 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FONTANA FAMILY YMCA 7.801.38 0.00 7,801.38 AP 00360425 07/22/2015 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTOR 175.64 0.00 175.64 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 13 Current Date: 07/29/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait t Time: 14:55:06 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P33 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/8/2015 through 7/28/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00360426 07/22/2015 REGENCY ENTERPRISES INC 4.849.20 0.00 4,849.20 AP 00360427 07/22/2015 RENDON,LIJCERO 396.00 0.00 396.00 . AP 00360428 07/22/2015 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 335.00 0.00 335.00 AP 00360429 07/22/2015 ROOT,FRANK 149.54 0.00 149.54 AP 00360430 07/22/2015 S.CALIF. MUNICIPAL A'IIILETIC FEDERA'T'ION 750.00 0.00 750.00 AP 00360431 07/22/2015 SALIDO, ROSEMARY 8.10 0.00 8.10 AP 00360432 07/22/2015 SALINAS,ERICKA 68.00 0.00 68.00 AP 00360433 07/22/2015 SAMS CLUB/SYNCHRONY BANK 141.49 0.00 141.49 AP 00360434 07/22/2015 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SIIERIFFS DEPT 446.08 0.00 446.08 AP 00360435 07/22/2015 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SI IERIPFS DEPT 1.170.96 0.00 1.170.96 AP 00360436 07/22/2015 SIEMENS INDUS'T'RY INC 1.937.10 0.00 1.937.10 AP 00360437 07/22/2015 SIGMANET 17.600.00 0.00 17.600.00 AP 00360438 07/22/2015 SIGN SHOP.THE 423.36 0.00 423.36 AP 00360439 07/22/2015 SMARTLITE 150.00 0.00 150.00 AP 00360440 07/22/2015 SMITI I,TANINA 29.70 0.00 29.70 AP 00360441 07/22/2015 SNAIVDER, RICK 0.00 260.00 260.00 AP 00360442 07/22/2015 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 14.30 0.00 14.30 AP 00360443 07/22/2015 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1.701.17 0.00 1.701.17 AP 00360446 07/22/2015 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 9.216.23 0.00 9216.23 AP 00360447 07/22/2015 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 189.862.33 0.00 189.862.33 AP 00360448 07/22/2015 SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 230.00 0.00 230.00 AP 00360449 07/22/2015 SPARKLETIS 78.77 0.00 78.77 AP 00360450 07/22/2015 SPECIAL SERVICE FOR GROUPS 84,992.00 0.00 84,992.00 AP 00360451 07/22/2015 STERNBERG. BRIAN 10.05 0.00 10.05 AP 00360452 07/22/2015 STOTZ EQUIPMENT 688.47 0.00 688.47 AP 00360453 07/22/2015 THOMSON REUTERS WEST PAYMENT CENTER 415.34 0.00 415.34 AP 00360454 07/22/2015 ULINE 2.662.09 0.00 2.662.09 AP 00360455 07/22/2015 UNIQUE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 1.088.88 . ' 0.00 1.088.88 AP 00360456 07/22/2015 UNITED ROTARY BRUSH CORPORATION 1.375.38 0.00 1.375.38 AP 00360457 07/22/2015 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 225.91 0.00 225.91 AP 00360458 07/22/2015 UPS 183.89 0.00 183.89 AP 00360459 07/22/2015 UPSCO POWERSAFE SYSTEMS INC 19.683.00 0.00 19.683.00 Al' 00360460 07/22/2015 VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE 101,499.40 0.00 101.499.40 AP 00360461 07/22/2015 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,260.79 0.00 1.260.79 AP 00360462 07/22/2015 WIIITTIER FERTILIZER 2.565.00 0.00 2,565.00 AP 00360463 07/22/2015 YERO,ART 32.37 0.00 32.37 AP 00360464 07/22/2015 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC 8,618.30 0.00 8.618.30 AP 00360465 07/22/2015 I PLUS I TECIINOLOGY c/o US BANK N.A. 177,175.00 0.00 177,175.00 AP 00360466 07/22/2015 10-8 RETROFIT INC. 2,934.90 0.00 2,934.90 AP 00360467 07/22/2015 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 53.81 0.00 53.81 AP 00360468 07/22/2015 ACEY DECY EQUIPMENT INC. 136.50 0.00 136.50 AP 00360469 07/22/2015 ADDINGTON, MATTHEW 95.00 0.00 95.00 AP 00360470 07/22/2015 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 79.40 0.00 79.40 AP 00360471 07/22/2015 ALLDATA 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 AP 00360472 07/22/2015 ,ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC. 285.00 0.00 285.00 Al' 00360473 07/22/2015 AR'T'OF LIVING FOUNDATION 144.00 0.00 144.00 AP 00360474 07/22/2015 BARNES AND NOBLE 63.37 0.00 63.37 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 14 Current Date: 07/29/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED- CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait L Time: 14:55:06 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P34 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/8/2015 through 7/28/2015 Cheek No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00360475 07/22/2015 13112 1,055.06 0.00 1,055.06 AP 00360476 07/22/2015 CAL I'ERS LONG TERM CARE 268.00 0.00 268.00 Al' 00360477 07/22/2015 CALIFORNIA I3UILDING OFFICIALS 105.00 0.00 105.00 AP 00360478 07/22/2015 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 55.00 0.00 55.00 AP 00360479 07/22/2015 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 300.00 0.00 300.00 AI' 00360480 07/22/2015 CALIFORNIA I.1I312ARY ASSOCIATION 2.700.00 0.00 2.700.00 AP 00360481 07/22/2015 CALPERS 129,781.11 7.150.20 136.931.31 *** AP 00360482 07/22/2015 CCS ORANGE COUNTY JANITORIAL INC. 280.25 0.00 280.25 Al' 00360483 07/22/2015 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 899.88 0.00 899.88 Al' 00360484 07/22/2015 CINTAS CORP.#150 919.96 0.00 919.96 Al' 00360485 07/22/2015 COLD DUCK PRODUCTIONS INC. 700.00 0.00 700.00 Al' 00360486 07/22/2015 D'ANGELO,GIOVANNI 15.00 0.00 15.00 Al' 00360487 07/22/2015 DAGIIDEVIRIAN,KATIIY 243.00 0.00 243.00 AI' 00360488 07/22/2015 DCI'81H AND VINEYARD LI,C 3,256.00 0.00 3.256.00 AP 00360489 07/22/2015 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 301.00 0.00 301.00 Al' 00360490 07/22/2015 DREAM SHAPERS 275.00 0.00 275.00 Al' 00360491 07/22/2015 EIGIITII AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC 417.74 0.00 417.74 Al' 00360492 07/22/2015 ERGON ASPHALT AND EMULSIONS 198.98 0.00 198.98 AP 00360493 07/22/2015 FAIRA 0.00 87,772.00 87.772,00 Al' 00360494 07/22/2015 FIORE, MEGAN 95.00 0.00 95.00 AP 00360495 07/22/2015 GALE/CENGAGE LEARNING 20,908.78 0.00 20,908.78 AP 00360496 07/22/2015 GOLDEN STATE RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY 112.008.00 1,127.00 113,135.00*** AP 00360497 07/22/2015 GONSALVES AND SON,JOE A • 3.000.00 0.00 3.000.00 Al' 00360498 07/22/2015 GRAINGER 501.32 0.00 501.32 AP 00360499 07/22/2015 1111,15.CORY 424.00 0.00 424.00 Al' 00360500 07/22/2015 INFOGROUP 11.600.00 0.00 11.600.00 Al' 00360501 07/22/2015 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY GROUI' 1.579.65 0.00 1.579.65 Al' 00360502 07/22/2015 INLAND VALLEY COUNCII.OF CI IL1RCI TES 1.325.00 0.00- 1.325.00 Al' 00360503 07/22/2015 JOHNNY ALLEN TENNIS ACADEMY 4,235.40 0.00 4.235.40 Al' 00360504 07/22/2015 K K WOODWORKING 3.952.48 0.00 3.952,48 Al' 00360505 07/22/2015 LEON,LYDIA 80.00 0.00 80.00 Al' 00360506 07/22/2015 LIBRARY IDEAS LLC 19,055.00 0.00 19,055,00 AP 00360507 07/22/2015 MEINEKE CAR CARE CENTER 900.55 0.00 900.55 Al' 00360508 07/22/2015 MMASC 95.00 0.00 95.00 Al' 00360509 07/22/2015 MOORE PHOTOGRAPHY 205.20 0.00 205.20 Al' 00360510 07/22/2015 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 3.78 0.00 3.78 Al' 00360511 07/22/2015 MUSICSTAR 2.786.40 0.00 2.786.40 AI' 00360512 07/22/2015 NEWSI3ANK INC 7.140.00 0.00 7,140.00 Al' 00360513 07/22/2015 PAL CAMPAIGN 10.00 0.00 10.00 Al' 00360514 07/22/2015 PEI'BOYS 155.48 0.00 155.48 Al' 00360515 07/22/2015 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 84.24 0.00 84.24 Al' 00360516 07/22/2015 REM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 203.58 0.00 203.58 Al' 00360517 07/22/2015 ROBLES, RAUL P 105.00 0.00 105.00 Al' 00360518 07/22/2015 ROSLOF, BEN 28.92 0.00 28.92 AP 00360519 07/22/2015 SBPEA 1,062.04 0.00 1,062.04 AI' 00360520 07/22/2015 SEXTON,SI IEILA 6.00 0.00 6.00 Al' 00360521 07/22/2015 SIIERIFFS COURT SERVICES 491.65 0.00 491.65 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 15 Current Date: 07/29/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED- CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait L Time: 14:55:06 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P35 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/8/2015 through 7/28/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00360522 07/22/2015 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 150.00 0.00 150.00 AP 00360523 07/22/2015 SI IERIFFS COURT SERVICES 93.38 0.00 93.38 AP 00360524 07/22/2015 SHOWCASES 401.76 0.00 401.76 AP 00360525 07/22/2015 TAI KO CENTER OF LOS ANGELES 2.000.00 0.00 2,000.00 AP 00360526 07/22/2015 TESSIER.JEAN YVES 2,500.00 0.00 2,500.00 AP 00360527 07/22/2015 'TORO TOWING 275.00 0.00 275.00 AP 00360528 07/22/2015 UNITED WAY 157.00 0.00 157.00 AP 00360529 07/22/2015 UPS 51.16 0.00 51.16 AP 00360530 07/22015 Verizon 38.12 0.00 38.12 AP 00360531 07/22/2015 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 4.778.01 0.00 4.778.01 AP 00360532 07/22/2015 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 1.786.22 1.229.27 3.015.49 *** AP 00360533 07/22/2015 VICK. LINDA 1.500.00 0.00 1.500.00 AP 00360534 07/22/2015 VISION SERVICE PIAN CA 10.865.44 0.00 10.865.44 AP 00360535 07/22/2015 WAX I SANITARY SUPPLY 3,270.90 0.00 3270.90 AP 00360536 07/22/2015 WELLS,ERIC 0.00 60.00 60.00 AP 00360537 07/22/2015 WHITIEN, MONIA 99.00 0.00 99.00 AP 00360538 07/22/2015 XTREME DETAILING 375.00 0.00 375.00 AP 00360539 07/22/2015 ZERE'I"ZKE,JOHN 2.000.00 0.00 2.000.00 AP 00360540 07/22/201520110 CORPORATION 1.848.00 0.00 1.848.00 AP 00360541 07/23/2015 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 20020 0.00 200.20 AP 00360542 07/23/2015 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 200.20 0.00 200.20 AP 00360543 07/2320/5 HEMAUER.PAUL 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00360544 07/23/2015 ABC LOCKSMITHS 2283.74 0.00 2.283.74 AP 00360545 07/23/2015 AGILINE LLC 3,600.00 0.00 3.600.00 AI' 00360546 07/23/2015 AIRGAS USA LLC 0.00 654.23 654.23 AP 00360547 07/23/2015 B AND K ELECTRIC WIIOLESALE 1-782.45 0.00 1,782.45 AP 00360551 07/23/2015 C V W D 128.029.96 696.78 128,726.74 *** AP 00360552 07/23/2015 CALSENSE 3,139.58 0.00 3,139.58 AP 00360553 07/23/2015 COMP U ZONE 752.78 0.00 752.78 AP 00360554 07/23/2015 DAISY WIIEEL RIBBON CO INC 792.48 6,000.00 6,792.48 *** AP 00360555 07/23/2(115 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 1,161.31 0.00 1,161.31 AP 00360556 07/23/2015 EMCOR SERVICE 64,904.79 0.00 64,904.79 Al' 00360557 07/23/2015 EN POIN'TE'T'ECI INOLOGIES SALES INC 45,071.84 0.00 45.071.84 Al' 00360558 07/23/2015 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 2,155.23 0.00 2.15523 AP 00360559 07/23/2015 FASTENA I.COMPANY 612.09 0.00 612.09 AP 00360560 07/23/2015 HYDRO SCAPE PRODUCTS INC 1,845.81 0.00 1,845.81 AP 00360561 07/23/2015 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 2,500.00 0.00 2.500.00 AP 00360562 07/23/2015 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 745.54 0.00 745.54 AP 00360563 07/23/2015 LANDCARE 57.870.64 0.00 57,870.64 AP 00360564 07/23/2015 ORKIN PEST CON'T'ROL 1.620.66 0.00 1.620.66 AP 00360565 07/28/2015 BELL, MICHAEL L. 0.00 1,560.49 1.560.49 AP 00360566 07/28/2015 LONCA R. P1111,IP 0.00 920.36 920.36 Al' 00360567 07/28/2015 'I'OWNSEND.JAMES 0.00 1,560.49 1.560.49 AP 00360568 07/28/2015 WALKER. KENNETH 0.00 246.76 246.76 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 16 Current Date: 07/29/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 14:55:06 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P36 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 7/8/2015 through 7/28/2015 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount Total City: $8,619,063.96 Total Fire: $519,754.76 Grand Total: $9,138,818.72 Note: *** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures • User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 17 Current Date: 07/29/2015 Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 14:55:06 P37 cr94,STAFF REPORT k CITY CLERK L S OFFICE J L RANG HO Date: August 5, 2015 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Dir By: Carrie Pincott, Records Coordinator Subject: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE BI-ANNUAL ROUTINE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090, THE CITY'S RETENTION SCHEDULE, AND OTHER APPLICABLE LEGAL CITATIONS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolution authorizing the bi-annual destruction of City records pursuant to California Government Code Section 34090, the City's Records Retention Schedule, and other applicable legal citations. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The records in the attached destruction requests have met their required retention as listed in the City's Records Retention Schedule, and are due for final disposition. The records have been reviewed and approved for destruction by the Department representatives. Respectfully Submitted, Carrie Pincott Record's Coordinator P38 RESOLUTION NO. 15-146 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS SET FORTH IN CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 AND OTHER APPLICABLE LEGAL REFERENCES. WHEREAS, it has been determined that certain City records have been retained in compliance with all applicable Federal, State and local statutes; and WHEREAS, said City records have met their useful life and are no longer required for public or private purposes; and WHEREAS, destruction of said records is necessary to reduce storage costs, increase staff productivity, and maintain conformance with the City's Records Management Policy; and WHEREAS, said records as listed in Exhibit "A" attached hereto have been approved for destruction by the City Attorney; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: SECTION 1. That approval and authorization is hereby given to destroy records described as Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION 2. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution, and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect. P39 MEMORANDUM LJ RANCHO Date: July 8, 2015 CUCAMONGA To: James Markman, City Attorney From: Carrie Pincott, Records Coordinator Subject: Request for Approval of June 30, 2015, Record's Destruction Attached are Record's Destruction Notification Reports for the June 30, 2015, destruction of records. According to the Records Retention Schedule, the attached records are now due for destruction. Please sign once below confirming the City Attorney's approval of the semi-annual destruction for the attached forms. City Attorney Approval ignature Date P40 EXHIBIT 'A' Records Destruction Authorizations for the following Departments / Divisions Building & Safety Finance Fire Finance Fire Safety Finance Redevelopment Personnel Planning Special Districts P41 U as a N - O - O O N co w M .0 a a :: 0 0 0 O o N N N N Y .NCI y 0 o 0 I 0 w i J O 0 o o N .i Y In In Ill V1 !n Ill 1f1 N 0 O O O O O O O O CI >6•.... N N N N N N N \ \ 10 A Q O .y co 0 0 -1 O O ° a O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E r. y E 0 o a m x Y 07 9 en M m M M M M d ' 01 O O 0 0 0 O 0 O a C N N N N N N N .0 9 - W 0 O \-I O O 10 A r y W ti N M V A O VD 7 p 0 0 0 0 0 O O or. E to a x kb p OI N M M M M M M o _ C .. ., .. ., ,� ., i+• V F fl a C .0 O N O O 0 O O a v M U --1 .i V .� .-I .y .-I W c et Q . d 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O: R O W V CO — \ \ —. \ — � C C .44 > y 07 1-1 O O O O o O ✓ N 07 co ra y u Y F Q C 0 w 7 C W .6•.- 0 w Ill ra U O E c p t o d m H C. , x O E .c N .0 0 Z O \ O C C a N 7 6. a \ NN) "� > 7• X IY n .. Y ° ) N N• O .° 0 in--. I� A a V Y Y to L \ Y gn in C In t o i--1 L M pV 07 o°la � o E E E C E „ E E E `-/-)� E y m y1 O V A 0 W C O C 0 u 07 c 07 ° 1 07 p( 6 .1w > z a a s a. C 0. a a s a a c O a p N C C C L C c C i0 C G C C u O N r o O O_ VI O O I,l O ^ O O Q a 0 - ao N c u . L u " U u ti ° U v U U N � � o vu° 2E < 2 :di M a 22, rn 2 '"' O '' L. � 2y L � 0 y oxo°1e yo cao m to a. in 0 CEaD c E cE c Ea O cu m U U ry Ua r. U6o c Ua .Ua Ua 0 U C W y, D u a D O a O n« 0 a rn a' C �r ] D 'a C D D U D D D i- d JO+ O y Y CO C CO y di y '0 a a a 6] N II S. V E D \ C D M D M D D D D t? L. o N H 0 •. m 07 ,. o .. 0 •, w- o w ' D o u -. E ;:\ .. 10 \ ."-1 .730 .+ m .+ i .+ m 5'7 N ` O c N O C O c Ct C M O C Cl C 6 C 07 O L LL " LL .y LL M LL O it LL LL G V a C y 0 N N N N N N N �` j LO0 y aci CU 0 0 0 W oo co CD V N 07 t \ 7 Y Y L C C C Y 0 in in iii vi in in vi in in in in vi N i b. y 3 0 a c c c c c c c c c c c c c c m c Y c E « « 0 « « « « « « « « O « ` A N A 7 C C C C C C C C C C C C C C . y Z 00O moo woo 01000 N o O O .I 0 0 \ W Iq C C C x 10000 10 U U ‘000 10 U O U 1C U NU N00 a � $ o •Np 070 Nx x x Nxx Nxx Nx x x Nx Nx Nx x 6 f0 h 0 0 0 Ifl O O 0 0 0 1fl 0 0 0 1fl 0 1fl O h 0 0 E a c 2 c = v m m m a, CO m v CO CO v CO CO m v m v m v CO m Z .. 9 oli d t t C t t t. C 71 0 C Y Y a a a a a a a :o+ mU ; a ° E E E E E E E O E w Q .�' Y 0 a a a a a a a Y O• CO - y 01 N N y ^ w w W nW W W W =_. y ra Z O m K H V �. W v >_, 4, Qa `9 p P42 U to 0. 03 w ti C o 0 N o H V an-4 J N N w l .� w O O O 01 C m ID O a i fel 71 0 CI O E ,.. y E p o .0 R Z O 71 9 N '0 0 C N o O o n O o. 9 C q y N W C e O 2 11 11 11 11 11 O.' X10 0 a 791 0 ' N N t+ V f �j a A C 2 = 9 0 2 O n U O X01 N O Y m H W• M U 'al O d V 71 W• CO 0 .ai W 9 Co 9 y O H 9 t C C .° 1>y Y 77 .0 m N X a O O rt G. ry x m •.. _y d m +O' • E c N 71 X U V C F O c o X d m 71 71 Y. 7 c W 0 w 6 0 W y 0 m o u E Q ai Z o a m z j d u o •E .0 N 71 01 W 71 c C C cn P L O •4 al W 77 O C N 7 a c0: z 11-1 N > Y O W Q O 0 01 C a u m > e m "v � ' J 77 a 1-1 o 0. e m o C U m - .W.1 X'> 2 .... ~ az if)O N w C 71 C ++ 77 6 M 01 1 0 � o0 EU N C = C m 0 0 o Q E m Y 0 W 0 Y y— m f b t — 9 O L • 9a i+ u9 V. L .0 N a' U w Y 0 L d 7 Y Y L --I 9y k c a c' . 9 7 71 E w md m' M 1- L c E X 0 a tu m 'a 0 .o-'d 411 0 E m u H a m 7 ... e s. dt Z a. C IS 71 C ei o e Y Y '.0'. my GNo uZ x >...-c m m. • 6 . O C O Y adz Cu 0 O O — 71 i 7N1 N > '� N Z O 70 re f 9 ..'. W tc, o it 3 N a V N N V V1 l0 V en • ti O M N N V' V' It N Eli C O O O O O I O O O N N .1 N N N N '1 O O O 0 0 0 0 14 1 .1 IA a O O N H H N N N N w a°. 111 in In IA 1.11 Vl In Ill w .I .y .a .y 1-1 .ti i-.1 O O 113 1-1 O 0 0 0 0 0 O O 12 IN \ , N N N N N N N O R E O O O O O O O O ° at \ � � � \ \ O O 0 0 O O O o O O E n . W E 0 o a 0 S 0 0 9 00 00 00 00 07 00 07 r. P. OI O O 0 0 O • 0 0 o a C N N N N N N N 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 4.3 Gir aa.. W � 7 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 rE m O 0 CO o co N N 0 N N a. •+ ^ Z .o v o o o o o O o o (J F• C ,C N N N N N N N 0. 0 .w U 0 O7 ti I-I - - .v-I NI 1-1 C < = 0 O O 0 O O O 0 CO OI W 9 m N .tea N N. N N N M r O O O O O O O O O 7 N C N E b N N m a1 1•- 7 C %"'. IO N o E U d m t o c LI oIZZ I% cxN • O C ma) N 5B14 10 A a N 0 R b Z o C H N g C a _T G O V 6 °C 0 Cy ° O ° E W W 0 v W W a) C 0 O 'r > Z I� T W a`c T CO • > co T ,c NI -W„ y mE my Io Io Y IC co N co a o • VI v ...- c a '' to In to L 0 co Ian °o In A $ C U C O C o C C CO C N C N C Iy a ° 7 .. 7 J 7 = 4j 7 V cU � W $ uv uv un un .; uaL' unVl uaO 1) oai � au ¢ W a ;, -.. > a ;,f as a ;. To pF �' 01 a aZ a _, at a c O E W c a.+II Z E ." v cF Cu CO.` c C c b e ° F rI E .. E .. 'o co .I 8 ;r .y 8 a o 0 7 N • s _ryry w h .y o.w v_, ' 0 .0 Q S d uQ � U � a' � ¢ ¢ � Q V � Q fu/1 w � ¢ iVA w � ¢ > QC OV V V 0 0 0 a ° .0 0 / . F r 0 o Z v y L' M a1 VI N IJI 14)• VI N . 9 N N VI E ` 0 3 0 E C C c c c c c c C C C c c c c D y E W ) W W W co W O O W 0 W W U) a m0 10Z 100 No .r0 0 N00 Iqo 0 o a0 0 0 w0 0 I... .. G 9 E x .l U 1.1 U O U O O D U o U U U O D U U O D U a mwO - 'C 00 Nx Nx Olxx O1xx 01xxx OIxXx Olxx E - to u m O. y 0 4 o a o o Tr o o a o 0 o a 0 o 0 Tr 0 0 V C E C 0 m m m co CO m ID CO m m m m CO CO z W W O C N 0 L- 10 s- CO I- ID C .0 W W W W W W W E r r r r r r r T., 3d 0 U O O C C C C C c C v. 5 Z N >...0� 9 v d E v `) W at C. o'm y F. v .,, w P44 V m u aIfl .-I .-I N .i N :.i m Ull N m )O 1' N m 00 O O O O O O O O In N N .i ei .I H N N u O O O O_ O - O O cks !A al 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N YI N to to N to in V1 w 0 O .a .-I .a 4-I. 4-4 .y .1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O a \ N N N N N N N 0 0. 4d in en en M M M en en It \ 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E . n E 00 a as 2 0 L co m m co a0 CO OD 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O▪ 0. C N N N N N N O O O O ....... O N m 41 gli• *i W no 7 C 0 O O O O 0 0 0 O > E too a o C c_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ^ F a m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 • V f S C C N N N N N N N 0 re c < 0) a 0 0 0 a 0 0 CC is 0 W O CO c o o ^ O o 0 O N. N N N 0 0 O O 31 N m C ca E G. •1 N m U Ip i• v C pO W. 7 w iii o u E iu m m ? o zr v 0 cLL o 0 '3 Z n ` x .4 qo c �i n o a � 0 C Z LL V en m 0 m.+." O • co m m a CI .. O U 7 o E a) c �, m e c 0 c ai O 'm 117 4-, m A m m m dm .0• e .1 S z 4 ° fa O N H G • C > >. N w > N N N rmIa £ W Ia S 0 i+ a a I O. O 0. a. 0. o m mE ~ c « in —° « 79 « « Y m a u ox > > U 7 U > > > > a , Y Q O S O xO O m U o v O W U w U 0N _ U 0 Y O N m U a)y, UC m m u -2 U� O U > U1] -0 • U � Y U O W Q j Q j U Q ?A a Q j- Q j U Q fC a ° IA E 0. 0. CO t CO C w a CO f E m m = c 0 P. D 0 7 F e = 0 a y 4• .0 0 m UO ¢ � CO a w i Q ¢ ¢ m an Q m C U a 0 0 0 0 0 a 4 m O 0 W 7 S y Z V C " m o a .. « « « « « « .« ..• « « « .. « « « 2 a = C C C C C C C C C C C C C C g .• m m C m = ;too N o o moo Ol o o O o o N o o moo I. ti O C E x OU u oU U OU U . QUO 14U u .iu U 140U• .0 -• .°. `o _ol 0 `00 Olxx Olxx coxx coxx Olxx Clxx Olxx E aC2C01m Omm vmm amm < mm It 00 amm amm 7 .. — at Z 9 m O L m co 0 i m 0 m L. is C .+ O E a+ >- >- > > > }• > ra m m V C j,C m C ICC C C C C C V 13 z al = Z a m H 9 W v C t S 4r i �F� a —9 Q CO P45 a« O V N 6 .-4 .-N .-N N N .-I T N .• 0 in O N Ot co N 00 1+1 O 9 O O O !O O .4 N A N N N N . i WI u O O O O O O O 00 00 N. N N N O N ti J o O O O O O .I o m m cu m to to in to in in in v-I .t O O .r .r .-1 .-1 .1 .r .-N o o o 0 o O O N C m T. N N N N N N N t0 A O` 0 O O O O O O O \ � \ 0 CO Lo O O co O 0 0 0 0 ID ID O 0 E n . a E 0 0 0 o v .0 0 co 0) 00 0 CO 0 N N N 0 N N 0 C N O O O O O O O O 44 u• r RI « pj cc cc O e y O O o O O O O O > E m ^ F D N O C °0 00 00 00 00 00 00 Y V f C C N N N N N N N c Q 01 2 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 • N O W 9 CO OI •- 9 N N N N N N N C C 10 ^ co 2 m O O O o O O O O O > •� to C = raw. n ` u u is O t O u c F o t', Ev ° m ? o z t w z °m ErN c u °1Q N • xu . O c C N N j a \ A LL n T M t0 2 4. F a 0 « 0 00 « OOt a 3 c Ct' O y u '- 0 0 E v v v r v w v v C C •-i T> z B B B m no B B B • .e el • 00 m m m o m m m m y in Y ., 0- E a a 7 a a a a•• o0v He o ��//tt 2 rn V tl y y to C C \ o 0 Eu° c v C 8 c .c C c c c c • N d u O 7 a+ 7 L. 7 .c 7 7 > 7 Ooro 04)t.0 eU fY ONm ua I Vn 0 U--M m 'um c ua ua f_ Vd Y u 0 < L •� " a >r° 75 Q >•C < >� < >7 < > u, a > 0 a >3 ILI cw " �° E 0. a a m a . aV1 ate+ I t O j a0. fl ¢ 7� x '�J c c S f0 c ti 4c u . ` ° _ H 7 0, 7 C 7 0 7 . 7 D 7 O N Qy HI E o a � 8 € - o .0 .-, 8 E • 8 v . oa 8E Q ved = u .0 ° a a ° a rv- ° a > ° a J ° a cc ° a to ° a > Q 2 w V et u V 0°' O V 4 V °v W 7 to, 44 C .. .. .. .. Q E v 2 V E c c •c. •c •c •c c c c c c c c cc J mot ., c E 18 ° v v v v 231.) v v v v CV 0 N N 0 A Z C C C C C C C C c c c c' C C E H1 O 0 1 0 0 m o o N00 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 a h . 0 -9 we O x x Ot x x Ot x x Ot x x Ot x x O t x x fax x •t CO yyyy H a m tf 0 0 p 0 0 a 0 0 100 a o O p 0 0 too 7 v C ` c 0 m m m m m m .m m m m m (o [o m z v 5 5. E O t 0 m m m 10 m t`0 I- c ° O t M i } y .} } } } j o E 0 2 N G 0.C C aa)) N W N 4.4 C \ V F-- b w p d V U > 7 > 0 7 O• 0 mrr,1- v .d > s-,-c & L & i I �V• �� O P46 8 a m a in to m en a m .4 N rl a V a V en en 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 to O N N N N N N N w w .4 3 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 IL QS tho to o J .a4 N N N N N .4 ri O N a 0 M In •In N 111 In in In \ m .4 .4 .-a .4 .4 ri .4 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O• d >. N N N N N N N N 10 co Q 0 O O O O 0 O O O O M\ rn O 0 oo O O O O O O O E ti a• m 0x o at 9 • > m m m 0) C 00 CO 0 0 .` N N c a C N N N N N 3 .0 C en el 01 M M M M 7 C 0 W O O O O 0 O O O d ^ > E m x ID Ca 01 N N N N N N N ▪ ^ S. 00 R C 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 ++ d tc▪ m 0 4 :13 m o O O O O 0 0 C C .d ^ O m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ca O O "n M 4. C A E D rLi N I. 5 0 • c 0 di y U d W 01 jC 9 .i o E O O t d N O• C m Z N I- O .4 C )y , 7 d m m LL r" 0 m N Ce E m O im• 0▪ >, M •N m C O d i m N 9 0 6 • C 0 O D U .- >0 E ^Nq o o d d d a) O) d C "� > Z y N - a a N ID a N in O N � o d 0 N T 0 N • N III 0 gl S \ y -. 4.1 a w Cl. a a. E d m a- d a. I- ---,bag E Cl c u c m c y c c E C 3 CO• 9 1 K y 0 O d 0 O d e" ow = -ow = U 0 2 O d 0 000 U▪ OW . Km aTB < T , < > aT8 < > < TQJ < > m W n - C w '� d lA 1 a c co LL d a > a m 0 0 0 d y) 0 u U d1 E E = c u c c ° c u c c c c = 00 N I.. s m 3 U J 3 m 3 d = O C N � . g = •E .43f .� oJ ..4319 ..43E .43E .Igc .-43 at 00 ° < 0 ° < : ° an ° a I1_ ° acs ° a >v ° ad X a. d C d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c w a3 d aC U a a a a a- a a f 0 d d = W 7 q 4+ L. . .. .. WI .. > E c 0 d E c c c c c c c c c c c c c c 5 me cE vv 2. y 11. v 41j, a 4. a; co dv m m d m ° C C C C C C C c C C C C C C OC 2 .yp o No o moo too moo 1000 No 0 L. :1 9 C E x NUU N U U NU 0 N U U N U U 041.) l) N O U a w « o Wv d o rn x x O+ x x dl x x a x x Ci x x Cl x x Of x x E m o m 00 to too too t o o t o o t o o too 2 a C ` C 0 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m L. C Gi 0 el 0 I-C or r 0 v 0 v 0 v L. 0 m Z y -° >C d L 0 C C c w IJ 9 0 0 t 9 L- L. i -� w m Y I. 4., C .. > 7 7 7 7 0 7 7" d 0 0 - u d t d X U c�L a+ 2 a 10 C I- 9 ..7.. W v fa 41 1 t A 41 --s:. 0 It P47 O N 01 O. In 10 N CO N M N H .4 en in m in t t t t ci in ° N , N N N N N .-- O 0 0 0 0 0 0 N t0 l0 t0 b tD tD l0 iw J .-I .i N N N N N N 0 44 in in U, Ill t!1 U, in Vl N 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 01 �� t0 01 Q 0 o o o O o o O a n ° � \ tO 'C � ID o 0 o a 0 0 0 0- 0 0 E r- vt Co a 0 t O c w O 0 0 0 0 co 0 al Z C Cl 0 0 0 00 00 00 0 o a C N N N N N N N 9 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 4.1 Ur O▪ C y W O O O O O O O O > E co ^ E .o N C 00 0 00 00 00 0 0 V f = C C N N N N N N N 0) C Q = a o te c 0 0 0 0 0 0 O W 9 m N N N N N N N C C 14 ^ ° w 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O > "-I m R GN 0 A ei• V w V C p t c E W w mv .. Z r 01 Z p t- i N Q P X Ztj O 10• o M n c a \ 7 4. E LL V 0 „ ° ate+ ° N 01 N q .0 12 0 O. C 0 G u u 7 ° E v w v v 0) 0) w ° N 10 ^ et 0 0 t. > Z .' >. >- o >. >. co >. >. o O a \ »• N i' w a C a A 0. 0. . a 0- 0. m• mo vo 4l _6 .'� a 2 y Y > Y '� Qi o = w Y X o w w o w = o v o w E = w o w o w W o ° tJ � vm un3 � a UnN Ling Unt UH °u UHF u ° yals � " a >.° Q >. v Q >.o a j.� Qom +-' c i. E cR2 W = •r) o w o a x 0. a N a _ 0. N a i a i✓ E E ... « 9f Z bD b � 23 iY, 2▪ t ` .i O 0 rH 0 u .-I 0 ei 8 w .-I Ou y1 .-1 Ou .-1 0 co Q Oa M ° Q en. 60 � Q (7 � Q > � Q N � 6 W - Q O � Q N a .. Y d 0 $ 0a 0t ' . ov ov ov 0v F w v .0 W 7 W to .. .. .. .. Z c c ` C d v1 in iri US 01 yin ill 'vi In In v1 h Ln L^ 5 E' c 7 v E c C E w v co w v w w v w w v v v w (C C M C V 4, 42 42 42 42 Y V ... .. R w 07 7 C C C C C C C C C C C C C C h. w K cZ m o o m o o 0 0 0 .-loo m o o m o o t o o CI ~ I. `o C x Nuu MOO Muu muu iYU muu muu 1° O1 9 v 0 Ci x x 01 x X 01 X X COX X 01 X X 01 X X O1 X X E " ° u l a m t o o t o o 1. 00 t o o trot) 1• 0 0 t o o 7 t C E CL m0] f010 f010 co co m m m m m m Z `. c 01 0 w L. � CI °O C as .0 W 10 0w) W 10 y 01 C E ° •; �- a. r >- > } > t r 3 z a ' , �� �1E�'� "t 12 t za mai � c ' u>I � Z c P48 41 O q in N N Cr In tO In in N H en M N M 19 M N O O 0 0 0 0 0 h 0 N N N N N N N 4 u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 N N N N N N .-I N Nq ID + IO In Ill In n to In In \ rl .a 4-1 rt I-4 .i 4-1 .i a O 0 14 >.� 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 b la 2 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 0. N M re) en en fn fn en M \ \ \ \ \ \ \ O O O o o o O O 0 to E ti o 0 E 0 o a q I o w 9 CO 0 CO CO CO CO 0 CO N •2 O1 O O O O O o O 0 a c N N N N N N N •5 0 O O O O O O R f+ W v to to to LID ID to to 0 g y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T E q ^ O 01 N N N N N N N a o �O c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ^ z a q a o 0 0 0 0 a 0 a CM q o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ce to 0 W 9 m \ \ \ \ \ \ \ _ c c .0 •^ 2 R O o O O O O O co N 01 w m E c 4'II N 0 U $ Ca N4- 6 o u c i) 01 0g90 C U 0 °0 2 = � O c 15 Z N 1- 0 , m c LL n O al w 3 � I a 0 O « o y of m q a y d ia at 13.0 a c I p V u ., J 0 E E ai 0 0 I, CD al 0 ai y0, C vl ? > Z I.Jf a c0 n m c m a m LN � O ym m m m a,° m co m •(7 m m a \ • y ., a a a at a a a a fa m 9 0 11 H N i i a 4.1 m 4.a •4 m a o v C c c v C C > C C la CO Na O S y O Ua U U � ow N UB W ow , Un U - VI uo O0We It a > v a > a >o a > 0 a >C a > a >" ■ c ,.. " a3 a a a, a > a m a aU TO }O! O Y q Ull to N 1�/ C 7 1�/ J C•a.L O yy F J o C C O C C C C LJ C 0 4 o J 0 J .0 J J O J 10 J y 6 t g Tu. 9 r■ V g .i O $ .a V C .y O J .a 8 U .y 8 0 rl 8 L co a° g 9 ri a 3 ° a US ° a z ° a X ° a a � ° a m` , a -, Z 1. al C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L a .0 O m u a a a v v v v . f 7 was L . Z q q 9 a N 'O c c c c c c c c c c c c c c 50c . e E 00 .00) .w. 0 w0 0mow, my a• 0 y q q Z c c c c c c c c c c c c c c In 0 0 WOO 0) 0 0 Ø00 0 0 0 N 0 0 N 0 0 Y "I P c E x MuU MUU lnUU ynuU 0UU 1000 IOU U a m m o H y' 1 O 0x x m x x 01 x x 01 x x 01 x x Ol x x 00 x x E a m 1 0 0 wr o o 'too loo p o o fl o p a 0 0 J .a. c E cr mm mm mm mm mm mm mm Z 9 0 i 0 m m m `q `m m L. O a1 0 C M ., >- j >- >- y } 0 E m m z 08i. c d c w cc c c L. �y� i Za° mrc � 9o" Wx 1 's c a P49 m V m a In 70 tO In a IO In re in w .4 .i a 'a a In O 0 0 0 0 0 0 in 0 N N N N N I N w m 0 O O O O O O w V H 4 a N O II ri N 1-1 .4 0 M N n M in I!7 In In In Vl In Ill .r 0 0 O O O. O 0 O 0 N • O G O O a 1n en In rn en en \ Ih o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E e- V po a• m = O W 9 CO O CO CO CO CO CO • ' 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 o n C N N N N N N N 0 rn en m en C in in N y 0 O O 7 0 O O O O O > m E _ a O C N N N N N N 0 O V ~ = C .-C N N N N N N N a+ 0 II• I O Q 9 CO ^ a O O ^ a O C C !0 ^ 02, 10 O O O O O O O O O > •i M +I C D 1-1 ry o IZ 7 C v •x 0 ~ 6 o U E U 10 v m 9 0 O p y m NN C V I 4 - x In O C Z N O N o 7 O ^ m b C- a « « ° O m _33 0 a 3 O U U co a 3 o E v V v v v v v ce C w Z T O• O M C W C > > T > T > yN w I IC L IV m IO IC IO \ a 0_ O a a a a a M o ° N H V V m r- m o 4 4 .w 4. m O E u C C C C C C C = • ID a X Ci 7 C to 7 7 w 7 J t, 8 4 O W — O O T O O O O 9 C = am W ° V - 0 U a� V 0 U U 0 U V V O C „... 0 W C m um PI u W C u W m u W V W Q U W U W -0 ✓ Oat < 3. , Q a o Q � a . Q a Q D � QE Q n � w +' a F m a 7 co! ° O « i 0 d t a a IaTO ID a W i E r U u o u o ° - H 7 •v� o K y g — 9 .-I 0 1n'' .-I L f -I ti E " u n 'r .R i -i t'i rI .-1 ,n v2i Z▪ .. m C 0/ 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O 4 « W C u a a a a a a a w ,s; 7 W ♦. t. YV 9 a. C aC aC aC C C C i aC C ah. V 9 9 W c ❑ c C c C C C C C C C C C 5 m C a+ C E Y 2 i W « to 111 R a E Z M o C O moo C moo moo m o o moo O O O 2 6 N C. 9 c E X mu V IOU U 4001.) IOU U IOU U 1° u U N u t au O 0 O Of x x 01 x x 01 x x 01x x O1 x x QI x x COX x m x — a m 1. 00 a o a O o 4. 00 t o o t o o 4. 00 E a C C 0 m m m (D IO m m w w m m m m m Z . W L L L L Ol to o W ci 3 m > >- >- >- r a go E L 11 V„ Ow.E .2 cO 7 7 7 �- v • ° m.y n W U u u c� Z °a mE4° a ' W � aL to M P50 at u to - a to a to Lt1 a Io In In of 0 N N 00 N O • 0 O 0 0 0 0 G O N 0 I N N Al N N M V O 0 0 0 0 0 0 tn j •1 .1 N ..1 N .I N v. 0 el m v N 111 in IA in In I(1 IA w 0 0 O N O O O O O C 01 T N N N N N N N b ai 2 0 o o o O o o O O a Ya el el en en en rn rn en O 0 0 O O - O 0 O O O E o- aE 00 m am a o 0] 0 00 co 0 00 00 C N N N N N N N v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 i W � L A y O O O , O en O 7 5 O T E A a O O C O O O O O O O •• E .0 al O O O O O O O 0. .mow v U O o1 .-.1 -i ..a ,.1 --N, v-, ..-I ivC < = d O 0 0 0 0 0 0 OI W V m N N N N N N N C C ! ^ 0 B a1 O 0 O 0 O O O Ao O > ^ in is c E 'c .Ni N a1 Cv a 4 .Z r N Z p _ .c O C O Z N 6 O •N+ q CIr a � LL m0 7 f O d y 0 M >. 2 m C m a c m 0 V 8 .. o o E m w a1 w w a, 0 a O •N m ,NN ce c . - >- Z M N 0 a] i0 0) a1 a] y N vi .—t' w a a a a a — a I' a o O 9 f C N u1 in f u1 in N N I- to a fflW C C C C C C O C C O O - U U U rn U C U m u u u V c u 0)a a n F a a a s a C a s a a a < a C > > c m c O o > > i P51 a Y m . V Ili m .y N - r. .-I VI H N e a M M a a N 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 in ? N I • N N I N .1 .y 0 O O O O O O a - a '7 O H N Si w la 0 a N N N N 0 0 0 N of 10 h in Ili N N In IA La .\i 0 0 O O o o o o O O ti \ 0 T N\ N N N N N N \ \ \ \ \ \ CO.a t M f0•1 foil o o o o r01 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E M aE 0o a m x O m ca 9 o o 0 N co 0 0 co r.• 2 m o o o O O O = a C N N N N N N 40 Yi C ri ri ri M Om OM ri N C yW \ \ tO tO to \ 7 lO t.0 O to O O O O O O O > E to .. I a R C O 0 0 0 0 0 00 V F C C N N N N N N N C. v ''' u C fir ti ti .\. - O O '-I V C < = Y 0 0 o o ri ri 0 IX Ia O W o m \ \ \ \ \ \ \ O7 •� o N N N N m to N C C !a • O N A 0 0 O O O O O O O 5 .i M i. E In a W m G t ✓ V N d' .. C p ;r 3 C v N ` h Ts II) 13 •-1 • r a Z o 8 L N C V N a N x in _yp C C .Z.I I G w V S' MI a n T to ,„10 7 ` F ^ ei . a E N O y p Ia O a a) w 12 4.0 o 3 m a e m 3 n 0 V ° o ff m .: w w w w w Cl.) a > C e •tea '•> Z 9 a a a a a - a $ '8 O 0 .+ p w c N to to N m Ia m w r to - « a a a a a U a o o_ a O to C to N 4 h V N � o >. N 4. I0 a �+ uy x = ° > > > E C o 7 m 7 D O 0 = a' w 0 V a V 0 Om u wL V.w > u > $ O42om aDUI aDE as Q Q >. c a > m aua 4. C 4.1 N N 10 N C N N w m oew w �_ 0 °. '° a S cof I E « a a a. F C C > C �i S'. w P itii 30 .-' Le YJ .- Ue W ." ,_ .-. 8 o3 .-4 8 = -E Nuuo3 O �, our U L o V O O u u p u D U p U w o U U 4ya ;; Ea ,., aln r, ax ,..Iam „ a r, a0 ,yaxx „ au f _ w C w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 o Wu V a a 7 V. V a Q la ' t air A '' Y = .. . .. . .. .. .. aE y v a C C N C N C C C N N Cw CC 1 ii y e w w w w w 2 2.3 to C C C C C C C C C C C C C C L. Ii:i E 2 m o o o o o N o W o o ;C o o 0 w o o x axxmx xx xxmaxa o ^o Oxx 0x ai o Ox x a � O m am pam OO CO � m m apo m C m CO m mm P Z a c a m - m `N N` `m - N` io o E 0 C •+ L i i i i i i i• C 4a C 4a 4J m C a 9 + W P52 k 41 u 0. en LO LO .41 an In •-I N w N N N N N .1 I' M O O O O O O O H o .1 I I1 N N M M N ...4 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 S 0 N 10 t0 I N t0 N 2 0 N 0 0 M 144 0 w N O y h '4. ei 0 C rri ..-I .--I ..4 ..-I .�1 .N-. 1.1 O O O O O O O �. OI a• N N N N N N N 0 Q 0 O \-I co\ W W O .\M 0 0 0 0 0 N N N 0 0 E N 41 E 0 0 .0 0 S C m no 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 01 O O O O O O O I. a C N N N N N N N \ \ \ \ \ \ y y C en M CO CO CO 0 M ri o C 0 W ..4 ti N N N M M 7 o 1 O O O O O O O a. E n X N O CO In O In O to to t0 C a ^ Z a m °o °o °o o °o °o 0 t. V f C C N N N N N N N d " U O IInn .\i .\.I .\•I \-I .\d .\-I 4! C Q !_' 0 a O O o a O o EL 0 O W O CO \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Ol •- 7 N .4 N .1 N M N C C ^ p y CO .+ O .+ O O O O O 0 ; A M y�5 C G .1 N 41 - y V C C ..A N 6 In In In In In In In w V N W a A C .'I N 4) W 4) N 0) 41 O• O E U p r N N LL it it it it LL it C u m .- N • x N a) > j a 5 5 a E q C IZ.I n 7 L C N N N N N N YiOC '" a n a0t0 K a0' K K d K K 7 w Z a, ,5 c > so e � 2 s \ \ \ tn p en o. p o E a a. a-. a a a a O 0 41 r� N •m W N .-N a .N Li et m a- zm u 0NM0 ,oC 0 a a a: a: a 0 a in D. O d 9 I- C ILA CO VI ut tO IIA 0 0 N 0 N u ∎ n S C U U ,y m en 43 113 U U N U U to o U fl U T _ to O = ar o oX >-.CI T T Toro > N ? >nti Li• oQL tCm Oo Cu : 0 Oj u ova . 020, 04 � 0w � III a C en O 0 O 47 c # v O v O 'c C It�J U t O U n X ry - ry V a E t U a K N K K � lU a; _ m >. ' rn i, O M j V an > 5 M N O N M , O an ? u QO 4 O 0 N O N 0 \ N U W O K N U O N U M O N A K• d - N a 0 .0 4I 44 U V V R R V V R P.. c Z▪ 9 9 L. w at In iti Y! ui ui .H ,y .t2 I^ Ln N In J3 '^ • ` 9 d a C C C C C C C C C C C C c C g oe «o c , � v " " 22 41 14 C C C C C C C C C C C C C C ^ N L� Z O O O O O O 0 0 OI O O pi 0 0 m 0 0 01 O O E in .-30 .:4-6 01 O .�•1 x x N x x ..4 x x .O.1 x x N x x N x x N x x E V C 2 0 a m too m a m m m CO O too m ° m m 1. 00 CO ° m m 7 .i .- i L. Z 9 0 t 41 o IO 4l A A ea N C E 00 C u a) a a Y Y Y Y o E ▪3 m a Y Z 9 0 ? C O N � N I- C d �� N t0 y_ S 41 Yii � d U o > L. }i.a > ��>1{ > c�-1 ) Za CO CC 1- v Wv �l 4 a �A O P53 It 0 u a 1- N In .• 't N N N H (A (q N M N N N .-1 0 O O 9 O O 9 9 to m r m H :1 14 .•1 1 u O O O O O O O . in a H O H H 0 H O O O In In In N to In � \ .-1 .-1 .-I .-1 .-1 .I ..-1 1`1 O C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c �.\ N N N N N N N to O E O ..y o o o O o o ° a t tel re) en en an en en en 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 O o E N. ac 00 2 0 0 o I.0 tD t0 t0 t0 VD t0 • O01 00 0 0 0 0 00 00 O a C N N N N N N N .0 •O ti O 0 0 0 0 0 O 44 C en nn rn en en rn en tn in La to 7 e N W 0 0 N2- 0 0 0 0 M 44 O d > E m o c 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a • CI^ f a m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �..� C C N IN N N N N N No b C Q r y _-1 H ti ,.1 - .-I ri 2 m 0 W a m - o o O O O O • \ M f1 V en V l O V .N ^ ° « 10 O O O O O O O O 0 5 g m C E O H n ` u « w Co IC O N W N 9 .p1 W W vi W W in N O• V E u C 0 Q1 0 IT it it IL LL it it 2 t as 2 p E a 4) 4) 4) C) W a) a) iC.I C N Z N '- 0 N C C C C C C C u O: ai It n > i > > > > > > > A N a) N Ql W N N a) 7 Ir a O w a. O a a a a a a a a`.I O N 0) A N a till Z' ° S m c 0 .. tn o. 0 o.In V a V gy O o E a a a a a a/ 0 M a'� Z y U U U N U U U U o N w O at e a .0 a a m a a a )°0y o�C .cn a O 41 9 f' C N N h N IL I) 00 N N N to Ita ° H p M a O y 0 41 m N CO N t. N 1"1 ■ a C U U -. U N W U m U O U M W U N U Ot 9 0 = C m C T tC >W > o ,>K >N kb > ° > _n6 O CU (G N O N UO IO N a7 u N N L N U0 u a42 � " ELT I Of W O . 04y Own 04 .. 0tco C W a1 a t0 W _a to _a C m a tD K m O y O o O d U O in # O O W N U O N y Y i $EQ� F K , U a CC ac U a CC ci p yyyz 1L 9 I`? w0 M TU 1n qw0 In= en el -° 0 en 0 < 9Lt V9 N ° NOW NUO NU Nom NUO ND aO' O C w O O 0 O O O 0 0 • 0 .c 0 Cu v v v v v v v F 0 m m r ii, Z Vq 9 1- C a £ YJ 'r1' i 17 E. 4.. u `a1' 4". .S. E. .'^. L .o z WE C C C C C C C C C C C C C JJ Ioc cE :: :3 22 .... E 2 2 vv 2, d m N C C c c c c c 0 c c c c 0 A � � Z moo 03 o Po o Ho Imo o tpo 0 tpo 0 vl a v Y O '7 WO N x x H x x N x x tau x .Nix x N x x H x x E H 14 u N a m w o o 1 0 0 w o o w o w o o 1- 0 0 .too O •r e m e i m m m m m m m m CO 0 m m m Z ... 9 al.0 L `m `m `m `m to m m L. C 0 O C Y C 4) W 4) N 4) a) N O E o >- - >- > > r r r U Z N G j• C N C C N C N N C �' O y _ �1 Z b y S 41 �i t O V > > U U 7 7 \� d N pp Z °a mo°1cI= v � w' � �l la J a It P54 01 u ea . M in in N V' N to . to O O O O O O H O .4 .+ a o 0 0 0 0 0 .. 1 N N 4, 10 Ifl .d . N J N N O N - N N .1 N N 44 111 to to in in in O o o • o o o O �. N N N N N N p• d t M enn1 en en M en a O O• O o o a o O a E al w Co J3 m I O 03 . 9 1p t0 to LO 0 0 0 0 0 C C 0 N N N N N L 6 . A Y c O O en M \ O en an- an in n io W xt n 0 0 o o O O O O >. E A . •a )4 la 0c 0 t ^ I 2re o c o 0 in in 0 a o N N N N N N C F = C oo ej▪ C O W CO 9 - O tO C C :, e^ 0 r N O O O 0 .+ O O O > i M C w mO M N x 10 ., a Co . C v c w N in yu N.W o 6 ° r0 01 N o Z O toZ Lil c tN it 1a_ C C O Z N c O ti S C O c FI a s 01 m t• o l0 a n i m e w 'w O ,r I a m " ° Cc *a In m m a V in Qa+ ma � o E a in a 0 • h u c �; z p v 0 r .0 y L V ;; cg O Nw0 0 C K M U OF (l 'n '03W 01 a a 0 C CO — C LUl .0 O N O W co >7 O/ m \ C • N •> •C n > j 01 CC °'1 C! O O � O M O O y — C n Q y� u y co m o a t 0 X _? _T C W o co f a O O L C a O L O , . 9 oa' o m N 7 i0 In J7 t/1M au T > 0.4 4 U ° U W ,m 0: ,� 0 .'n+ p O W 0 a n s '' O O O m aK rl'1 u ay ` ? C w v 9....... c c O 0 ' l7 = , — ' m — t 10 0 0 0 O u0 C 01 �- u O,m ZHto Q m eM1= I E E — F K ,O K c d n N m p n o O! a o 0 y°+ = mro mZ, yo CO 1°n ma Nn, N .b, > NZ, tit' O ` E O N t0 O ._ O N v .Wi N O O .a O — >..` W p O i' Q 9 .0 ,' Y y N U O N U m �i „y Q ,,,1 Q in .i a U a — U .-, N I .. 01'C 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 Q ` Y 0 C u V V 0' a 4 a f tta) 41 41 W ° A Y L .. .. . .. .. Z avc CG 77 � !3 'J' .'". Yib. 'J' : 17 iui • 4. YS y 2mo 3 C c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c 0 5 e C t C E i o v i u P. i 0 01 ate+ o w i N 10 0 C c C C C C C c c C C C C C C C .. O: • Z is 0 0 (11000 w o o P 1 0 0 0 01000 0 0 0 0 O O 0 , 0000 d M w d a, N x x tO x x x .i x x x x x O x x x N x x x E l0 O N 0 0. 0 400 40 0 0 400 400 o 10 00O 110 0 0 a C 0C m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m Z V L N L L L L L L 01.c 0 Ea CO ee O O C Y y Y Y Y Y Y Y u 0 091 c .... c c c c c V' ZCa � Y� 9 EL' w C C r 10 a O Ol 111 m V S > > j U tJ CJ 01 z °a fC o2C fv � wx. # &- �" G * P55 0 U a N N l0 r) in N VI a N H V O O O O IC 0 M N N N .i 4 0 O 0 0 .i 3 col O b M in w J O N H H O O •i A H U1 l!1 in In .•, O O o o 'i 'i O o o O C 0 T N N N N 1. e M i0 a - m en n in 1 � — O 0c) 0 0 0 0 E Ill C 175 aE 0 i co 8 � a N >O O O O O n N N W O O O W C 0 N 9 O �-. o \i el▪ gj o t C rn en en en 7 p y W O O O O II II II II II n°. E C y 9 t. y m a x %D 0 a 0 .0 C O O 0 0 ri >. ° 0 > >. U H F A C N 0 0 O = a C o C N N N « CL• V a 0 O o 4) U eg 0 V O O m cc co O 0 m \m N a O N n C C .in n « O .-- O O V X 0 0 > r4 M C o m g O 0 lap+ N a x to « a1 m m « Y ~ x n d m a o m u w 3 c y : N x a m a x « U 41 W O 01 2A m W � m Za a0iZ $ eiN d aW o C C 01 P x in a a a <�y1 W IG O C a N W n i• n 2 . O A P go 0 _W > ✓ .. f a « O a ,� O N u A T W w 'O O m ; � F� O v6 , CO E O V O •a) 10 d d N T•> Z N 0) cc C p > « Y O N ., o 0 0 L v a1 � 0 N 0 in 6 0 W C F C m 0 cm ti • eag `oU o 0 U ° UmO UquO y o S a. N O t O O E W v W 0 N W 00 n .i E E .i E .. V C to Y m 03 2 F- F n F 2 bL 2 L c =E to A y f � ° ° 0 2 t F a 0 a a. a 0 Q in — a N '0 � O � • av o2 o _ °' . a a « a a va a d U 7 ° ct C 4 a v .0 « r O m L W 3 A « r 2 12 3 124E b C `C b C w 4 44 '° g o c E z o 0 0 b o N o o 0) 0 `o 2 m « O —01v 41 00 Nx x Ox Nx x Nxx E '" ' V c E c 0 a m '^ m m '^ m moo m woo m z mr a c m o e « r 0) 0) 0) a 0)) o E3 3 ,0 « r r r r m Y y 2 9 � i.5 9 v a) w t o O «o `o '- b c o > > L. > '?' z any G C m C F 9 W v \ 13 J" G P56 It u u a Y-' a� in O m • O o • O H el Z O . -1 @ N 10 • J O IN v4 w m 'a LA w 0 O .+ 0 O C \ 1 G N m p O O. t Z 0 0 O O O E •• O E o0 a m I O w v N C N .5000 _s i6 N O C R M N W up G 2 y O h u l l II' II T E O v v a v^ G O ° oa o 0 ti ) F m C o = y C 10 Q = •� O j W d d I C t d C C ;0 R y O a U x d = Eau'O O S ..+ C y m m m O N x m x H p wp O a 7 C Z N N ~ h y O N Q 9 r. _ e E Z . N C0 • w d W 0 Z o ` CL Ii. N C \ d O 3 01 C V p p N to 'a W A t ee m U N > R 10 O W > a O U Q w C H n A d O 10 701 pi A 01 a 7 0 m C en • ~ F O s -01 N 1.1 0 d u 0 C 8 i i• n •••I E I.- o • 0 o al e = rt 6 , uw 4 el; og m aCm & v ✓ e U O O O m it i w it C J E 13 e Q `I L V i w O 5 7. 8 y Ai 0 O▪ N d 6' U 7 • 3 Y L 9E e e '" z• wm 0 E E to y 1z V C it E Z ~ E ° Y g0 V I. m bx H C O. CO O N 7 C i Z d C m O C a .0 , U O d q C ✓ Z N — C y y .° P A' e o a I-- Z V m C H 9 ? W v ° W �' o II w It P57 3 nk0 to N in in a N iii c 9 0 o 0 ,'y .i N u O O N j O 0 M N N .m+ VI in In .11 0 O 0 0 O O O 01 >� N N p a 0 \0 a m e1 M N 0 0 0 to O E r. a E 0= m a m 9 N In N a C N N N O O O N t0 N Y W M rn io a c y 0 0 11 11 11 11 11 > E m v v « a a G _ ° - rn o 15 a o 0^ 1^ a r I ,. m C a m c C y V 2 m al o o a O u X a 0 0 > 2 m Y c u m m in o m o « E p a a X m o 2 N e d a m o u .. .. a m I: C a ' N "' 111 p • m EP p .± U 4f 1.. m ea 7 •N m W - - m 2 O d 2 ° ? L N m a m m t W o c a rn a c U m f N 1. O 0 Uf UI at W A a. y+ 1a 0 o m 10 u a W >To `J K 2 J a A. li ii o Q el ( H ° d N W c m E E c ,7 0 G V al a' m .N+ >•> 2ai m u, o 0 iii CC e o {I.1 - m c '^ c 1^ 3a L \ - y oy v E c C19 ui m 6 O 0 L H e c o u y c -. I- [• in Eu mEN213 an E a, au 10 ay 0 ' i .: u) 33 • was U Ou m o 13 .0o '6 - a 'u° m c urs- c a G Q m W v d w N i In K V1 N a 1- W a O a .O 016 0 m +1, 0% iip U E'm " F ~ Y - -I C i L LL m C ` 0 H F a m ?. H ,� m Q tot = a m ¢ a, a � Ina .-al- ava = OM in 0 in D°' N 0 OQ p r W u V V H m W a N Y v tr.} .. .. .. 2 9 9 c r m ui J• in in �n iii iri N c a cccc 3 gy - E vv � 23 RI � m . C C C C C C C C H r 9 C E ap p 000p Y k pp UU88 p uuuu o E • a ° m m 8e o800 " mSG c mmrmm CO 3 m .. - r a1 v Z m C ai o eels C a t. mua 3da, E E 4. O m c 0 0 to w o E1,°. E2' co % x n J m re Z cm O O = au1 L a5l a > ^ W u m Z d 0a o F 9 n W xi W �� C w it P58 V 10 Ifl .I N O co Ti N O O IA III N N 3 A It WI j N N N N• N Y 10 in in .\i O O O 0 .a 0 a� N N O 0 6 n 100 1v�1 O N \ \ en 0 O O O 0 E A. O E oo a A S O 0 a 0 0 X. Q C N ON N O O O N .0 a Y yj 9 •m O c.. W m V C N O 0 11 11 I II II G X• E O S a 1 a a 0.t+ /` f o q O C O O O = y 0 0 IN o a. v V O .0 .\I ti 0 0 Y a.i 0 02 C O O n W a co O 0 p X - N p et a X a C C 0 N r A o O 0 U . O m uO «0 0 Z. lc a °' x my E X 0 a oy U V Y W 3 co ill N X 01 II a ?1 lei 0 0 Eat N O O W P W o Z i 01 2�y O C t. .0 O1 d C U 0 LL O 6 0 m W A O W �p N 2 Y w P. m�a0 3 y 0, y in LL .a. 10C A a V 0 atef o pV mazo E u `o F YI O N A n N W O: N �'.> 2 .4 a K C N N O m N 2 O. m 09 ~ 0 N 0 m O a a 0 x a o N a m r o O = O: O W 0 v O N 0 �X a v O O O Q m ILA 2 IL ei 1 LI O Y m O .4 0 0 m Er, ,a0 >0 Y 2 O a {- G N 4 N 4, t — a Owo O NO h 6110 a11 �e9 ' � 0F w C O U V d J I 7 R morale e aJ '�y' ;2J E .m. vo of `c• c CC 4 Y F 0 O WU : 2 ..1 0• 0 0 0 O N 4., O 01 9 O 0 N x x N x x al 0 N C ` C 0 6 m NCO m m m Z d L CI 0 C L .0 CO 2 9 0 p Tp �> S w . �f" F L iL Y o L o 'O C 0 t 0 O N y O U = U m II iLJ m P59 V O o O o o O (n a .• in 10 a 10 1/1 .I 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O N .I Ol di 7 N N u 0 O O O O O N 10 10 1O 10 10 10 o a a a O O N 41 .O+ N CO r) m M a 'Cr \ .. .. .-I ,-1 .i c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 O d N N N N N N N it Co ti io a O O ti ti ti ti ti a Y m O C o ,N-I N. ,N-1 N-1 - .N-I E ,. aE 0 0 m I 0 W 44 V 0 d 0 0 0 O .-. .. L L 01 0 0 0 O 0 0 t o C N N N N N N - .\. .\-I .\. ,\-1 .\-I al +L. W ' - � N N N N N N O > E m ^ x co 0 o o o O O .. .. o.^ F a To o 0 0 0 0 0 o f C ,C N N N N N N a °... " u ° v 0'. A O ^ W 9 m O o O \ O O C c ^ a d°° , 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O > .1 Y e Y 0 a L u u Y V N C O 'y, O C J 1a w IA IP O U E Ill al N •O o 0 Z Z ° w Z o c .c N c fj mO o ,n G lea C eg N 7 .o c u1a ul . p al as Q v N > a 0 1Zn a a u > c c c c c 0 Ul o c L N T 9 co m m a a) a) a) a) a) _ 0 a) al Y o a 3 C a) E E E E E J E -; ° 0 U V at O ° E ..± ._.i a, ._, t o ° ,� .n c , ° 'N 10 n '� '> 3 '� '3 ° F 2 < ^ d w 5_ Z y V U U V U ), .7 Y U a U O N C a7 O d' al' O' C_' O' a) a) al y0 'O 0 t \ co - Y O _ O _ _ o J U m O a m X 0 ~ O C O C c a) O m9 a) U ai a) s- ` w \ n 0 0 U C N C 0 C . C N C W _ ma C o U N V O x O L o f o .o 0 0 O �, m a O vi y O I V o C c c L^ w_ m " c I- o+ f 1_ Q o f pbo oW c am a. E av ° 0_ Ls. n E ° °y a " a 'n t • ..U e ,., Y ,. K o c U •• c c ._, ° ° Y u La E v u Ea E uai Y L M le ° ~ O O .` K c .` Q Q .` y C. ) III Z y v in a) M .. ' Mu N in CU MuE �; • Mu vD lb y .0 a Y V 9 a, LL Q a, N > 6 a! LL 0., Cr CO 0., K 0 J cr, a! U m L a) C a) O 0 0 0 0 0 0 g O .c co a' u vl vl ill in vl L.11 d N r 0 A Y L 9 ' C a � • L 9 7 C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C 1` m e Y c E .. w w v v v v a) v v a) v v v v ,I N a7 w co Z c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c L -. .° C E 1000 N 0 0 N o o m o o .i o o o o N o o o a) a L L x .1U U .1U U N U U N U U .yU U U U .1U U U , E .N1 r 0 9 WO 10 x x 10 O x 10 x x 10 x x 10 x x 0 x 10 0 x x E a m 1n 0 0 1n 0 0 1n 0 0 1(1 0 o la o o o o WI 0 0 0 m u ° \ 7 a e L c L CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO m CO CO CO CO CO m to o o C V O C Y .c 4.- o E r U Ti O) 0 u Z L O 0 G 9 > > > > > > 1.1 _ Y a7 h y OCI +u N Z a m F9 •.0. WvI 0 ....: A 34 a A/� C d P60 V O a O o O O O y V •+ N a N N to N O :1 m of of .1 - 0 0 0 0 0 14 10 v 10 - 10 10 10 10 N J O O 0 0 0 w N N IS N d' d' V V V' w D O ,..1 Hi HE .-5 .a RI lel O o o O O 0 ED >. N N N N N ID m O ti ti .\d -1-1 ti O a Y m 0 \ 0 Co .-I .-I H1 .i .V E 1. .0 m OS Y d.0 1--1 1--1 .-I 1-1 - .1L 01 0 0 0 0 0 i- 0 0. C N N N N N •-• .y .-- I-I rl id tor N N N N N O >. E m ''' x10 owl .. .. '. .. .-+ 0 0 _ c_ .1 — - .. ., ^ E a O o o o o O o• U F C C N N N N N re S v U O 0) --i -,-i ce-- .\-i �-i W a. ' 0 ^ W 9 m o \ o O o C C .111 a yo. m O O o O O IC it 0 v a C L O w � c -1 i. N '.' m y W L .a O▪ U E Z w N Ol 0 Z 2 7) Z O •C Z \ C V CO O o x m o c C C N =ate U 7.1 n3 d. 10 W P > M 10 • w s O. r, v y o . .. . m le 0 co) v u c >, c N 9 m m ; a m - w 2 v o U) C) V v C u u 0 O. o f +E' a) Ea .E. 1 E E - m 4"E C In CU C N H o N C W t > '0 W un 0 V 0 C O 0 m pi o cc.c \ 0 = Y V E y0 - 0 C d Q S x 0 0 F C N v p ° E v v m W ?� Ul '0 , CI) Q M O c — c - c C ca c v 10 00.1 u 0 U C LL D u n C It O c Ca C C I p C u c ii C V C d m N N a D inc O L� o o .". C N .i Vl Y '� O f u 13 O o WL � � n. Ev va 0. 4_, a � C) - 0 CV CA a ul E U c Y '` . S . '5 c 0 . C m 1 L m L m rn c ea L' E �' �' CL m C F z E c n m oh m E C in in f .a . ai E v E% Inv m r 0 Y ' L f+l ti 0 O' (0 .-5 E p M V C M V Y E 01 0 0 .0 IA 0 41 9 a+ 00 mN u. '�' Z � NUof � a0' E00 c; a) 0. � am' Q > \\(( 0 Y W a ' U 0 Ln in 0 in l ol oll Vol y m W . L .. .. .. '0 y C Y N iii iii vi iri iri vi vi if; iii ; bi in i.i in in vi if; • Ll t c a E C C C c c c C c c c c c c c C C c 13 10 C Y u u u u u u u u i u i u u u u u u (5 d 15 _ C C C C c c C ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ C C C L • v •e E Z M 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 ti .°. O 01 o w 0 1~0 x x x x 1~0 x x x 1~0 x x x x 1~O x x x 1NO N000 x x 'hal E R c a) C 0 Q. m N m m m m W m m m m m m m W m m m W m m m Z .... •E 01 ) d v v N N V W O C Y r L L U U U U U A Z H >'v N > > > > > O O - 0 N .5 N O V u �u¢I A u \T�u u d t a m p( F a �, w x r7� �� A v 1 0 d P61 V C a 0 N a M In Co C C Y1 O 0 H +' O H O J 0 N m Y M .I ,_, .. p 0 0 O N N N A. O >O CO O a b m en N O Co .1 E ti o a E QS gs Y• W ata .. N O CD 0 N O O O N 0 a C a .a .0 'c .n Y YI C N ela N W N en C 0 Y '+ II II 11 II 11 > E Y n x tp 001 a C. 9 ° y y 0.t+ U II d R C o o = 9 o o o• d' • U O IN Y C 41 Y a a) N ° V C N CC a7 CO W 9 CO O\ 9 x = N 9 0 a1 x C c .° a 81°0 o O m y O a OoS � .+ C 8 Calm° 8 u 10 " N c ` y a o a1 y V c J ° x 'B m a x it EZ m90 m° it, mm° Z ° a1 z O E L N N W O a 3 c° u my N '.- a a w m N c y N mod \ W 'm 3 f a n > :0, mo o a "" O N _ij R > C O q d 'O N a) �i Y 0 6 ; C a1 O cV u a' 'o ° E E u y yi N_ a1 J 0.) IX d .y > > ZY V L• N• M � '-'' W 4-1 Q a a O d 9 F C N N a V C u �� i C o o P .. v u E C = o N N .0 3 (10 t• 0 < t a o U C W Y c N ° w° « d w m E • ..f E ° y F 2 a N o d 9 m a U ` O p w w ; M a+ u 9 Cn K K 1!1 O TC d IXU 1r1 Y Y d • ea N 1. \ . 9 9 C Y 0 vi L. c a bi r 9 ° C E a a a co e Y • - O 0C EZ No 0 0 ` a in nao .°-'d do 1Dxxx a c ` C 0 a m , co m m c Z .. '0 � 0 y a C a1 O C_ Y Y•w p U 3 9 01 \ a1 Z N .• j.C d W• o m _y u a1 N y 074, u N Z a m CC f 9 ..7� W a l Q to d P62 U 0 07 O O N .1 a o e o 0 N C -I U W J H N .4 s IA .-i ti w 0 O O ti 0 0 C 01 0, N N p C fa 2 M '1 In N \ --, 0 O O - .-1 E r, m E o0 0 J2 m I O D 0 01 Ot N al o 'C 1: C - 0 N O O O N O 0 L O \- C en 7 i 07 4 W N N N 00• 0 2 .-i .+ II II 11 11 II r E to „ p 0 0.0 0 tV E ^ .O q C .- 0 N 0 = 0 C C 0 eg 0° 1 Q O 0 y 4.1 a t W O p( O a W D m \ \0I « N . 1 C -- 0 X C N 01 C C N N O O a o U X a c m N p y E 3 0 o W m . « y k m « N o w Ol L �' 01 d 0 01 10 W U C N mm « in N 1. X 01 m a x y u W > 01 q D .t a' K O • 01 p1 O oo co Z 0 01 O y L N 01 W . W 01 R . 0 O c ry ‘,9 , - 0 - X C VI N C W 07 \j .10 Z a > N\ O E .,. E W a et 413• 0 II' ° ° ' �, as TO Y U 1-•...C1 0.— w f CV 0 we y 01 yl O N_ C 0 C c 0C 2 C ti > > Z y� ozi 1O 06 a bil 0. 0 w D F C C O > C(y y O _ > O in p1 L O VI — 0 U1 I a; 10 Lou > ° v > 0 0 U d' Ol m JM .r > -co � �7 CV OWi � � I as in 'q C 4- Y at a) a 00 f 0 « 01 a o- 0 00 E .a Y O N .0 N j 0 Y1 ~ U 01 Oi 47 \, .0/�, q p y 9 O• c 'w O O ` \N.v ° c . 0O p OQa No ° - \, p .0 C 0l OTC-u O� O.. O 15 Y C 01 « L J 4-10 i- t ` p D D L C d i i i Y LO c « e E cv �`w `w c L ... ' - p re N Z {p O O O dl O C 2 f+l co o N V 6 0 41 0 0 0 m o Ni` r E `" V 7 I' C ` C 0 � m m m N CO Z 9 01 .0 Ol C C C 01 0 C Y L I_ L. .,, N D y ^ Y O M r, C u 0g O 0 U01NN 01 � $ D � w u \\ Y Z a m 0: H .. L x C w P63 m i a N V N O m O N .I ++ co tJ a N J N N .1 N N .I 0 0 0 O � 0% C N ID m a. O O O O• 0 10 tel O 0 O O E ro 0 mE 00 a m x 0 0 a) ,, Ln N • 0 T. 2 C N .I 0 0 0 .'I 0 O O. c is m s m N W ] 0 O it 11 11 11 II > E m « E SI tV E a0A �C at Ln O 0 = 9 0 0 F C N } 0 C m VQ a+ d c, O y0, 3i Ip W ' CI 11 d 9 cd co O_ N 9 CO m —+ m X t m C C = v Ot a m 0 a O V X a 0 0 ) N e 0 0 8 0 0 jai)j± E C h In X m Y m x m « m 0 �y1 N m �j 'O O m ONI u 4.1 Sf o 9 Y1 0 .O y Ea 0 « V F. m m .i W • pp N m z O d p — try a c in C C C I' is d # OI •10 W m m Q ry O W � fv a > + a Y' a O W a t E a 0 m :, o , - 0 0 I`-I 0 m c 7 In Z p v.d O• m• V1 F C W In 0 W .]L m g 0 y 0 t 0 CU tzce �V GVQ 0 Cm D � f n ' 1 at V C W « O .E tO E Y m o D i, y Y 0 Y M 2 0 'n F Y m .I 1 r N 9 .-1 c M ..0 U o N m N V 0 V g m 0 m w Ts C v ] m z W c m c y e OP', .. H mK mZ c 0 0 I. w o E E, 6 >c 00 0 E W N y •N C 01 O M x 0 am moo �^ Z o' e 0 e 0 v CO CO R``lill e ui 0 c+t+ .c a o E o . 15 m V o y OI E u 8 ° 05 « 0 n 0 p� �_ o v V 0 Lo to II W P64 Pincott, Carrie From: Guerra, Kelly Sent: Monday, lune 15, 2015 12:48 PM To: Pincott, Carrie Cc: Bopko, Chris Subject: Box 3340 Attachments: 061515 Box 3340.pdf Hello Carrie, Please see attachment. Box 3340 cannot be destroy because the content of the box have important bank statements relating to bonds and our Mello Roos Districts. Let me know if you need anything else. Thank you, Kelly Guerra I Special Districts Technician City Of Rancho Cucamonga 1 10500 Civic Center Drive I Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 909.477.2700 x.2592 I kellv.guerra @cityofrc.us I www.cityofrc.us I regisconnect.us 1 P65 STAFF REPORT '� y� ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES GROUP L� RANCHO Date: August 5, 2015 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services U ' By: Chris Bopko, Management Analyst III Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-01 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) WITH AN ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX REDUCTION DUE TO DISTRICT REFINANCING RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2000-01 (South Etiwanda). Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, the City Council is authorized to annually levy the special tax to pay debt service on the bonds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On November 7, 2000, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2000-01 (South Etiwanda) authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $1,365,000. On November 15, 2000, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 645 authorizing the levy of a special tax in the district. Bonds were issued on December 21, 2000, for the purpose of financing the acquisition of certain public facilities that included street, sewer, water, storm drain, landscaping and park improvements that were required for and would permit the development of the properties within the district. The special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through fiscal year 2024-2025. On December 7, 2011 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-179 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2011 in the principal amount of$658,000 were issued on December 21, 2011. On July 01, 2015 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 15-115 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District in conjunction with various other districts. The 2015 Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Various Communities Facilities Districts in the principal amount of $18,546,000 were issued on July 30, 2015. By authorizing this refunding, the City Council provided savings to the property owners for the remaining life of the bond issue. The annual debt service payment to the bondholders was reduced from $77,691 for FY 2014/2015 to $73,923 for FY 2015/2016. This translates to a 4.85% overall reduction in the annual debt service payment paid by property owners. For example, the FY 2014/15 single family rate was $298.12 while the FY 2015/16 rate will be $283.66 per single family dwelling. P66 CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-01 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) WITH AN ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX REDUCTION DUE TO DISTRICT REFINANCING AUGUST 5,2015 PAGE 2 The levy of special taxes annually is based on the square footage of the home for residential properties and is based on acreage for non-residential properties. This Special Tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through fiscal year 2024-2025. Attachments 1. Resolution 2. Annual Status Report 3. Map • P67 RESOLUTION NO. 15-147 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE- ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2000-01 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-01 (South Etiwanda) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds were previously issued for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District (the "Prior Special Tax Bonds"); and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said District, and this legislative body, by the adoption of Resolution No. 15-127 on July 15, 2015, previously established the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year based, in part, upon the debt service payable on the Prior Special Tax Bonds; and WHEREAS, on July 30, 2015, special tax refunding bonds were issued by the Community Facilities District to refund the Prior Special Tax Bonds resulting a reduction in the debt service payable from the special taxes levied within the District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body desires to adjust the specific rate rates established in Resolution No. 15-127 to reflect the savings in debt service resulting from the issuance of the Special Tax Refunding Bonds. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year 2015-2016 for the District is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and P68 incorporated in the Annual Status Report August, 2015 which shall supersede and replace the Annual Status Report July, 2015. SECTION 3: That the rates as set forth in such Annual Status Report August, 2015 do not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and are not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness. B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of administering the District and any bonds of the District. D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the District funds, including but not limited to, any special tax fund, bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report August, 2015. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. P69 SECTION 9. This Resolution No. 15-147 shall supersede and replace Resolution No. 15-127. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of August, 2015. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of August, 2015. Executed this day of August, 2015 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P70 Resolution No.15-147 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-01 SOUTH ETIWANDA ANNUAL STATUS REPORT AUGUST, 2015 P71 Resolution No.15-147 • BACKGROUND On November 7, 2000, the eligible landowner voters within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2000-01 (South Etiwanda) authorized the issuance of bonds in the principal amount of $1,365,000 for the purpose of financing the acquisition and construction of a portion of the facilities which generally are defined as street, storm drain, sewer, water landscaping and park improvements. The District is located east of Interstate 15 and is bordered by Foothill Boulevard to the south, East Avenue to the east, Base Line Road to the north, Etiwanda Avenue to the west and is intersected by Miller Avenue. On December 7, 2011 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-179 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2011 in the principal amount of $658,000 were issued on December 21, 2011. On July 01, 2015 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 15-115 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The 2015 Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Various Communities Facilities Districts in the principal amount of $18,546,000 were issued on July 30, 2015. By authorizing this refunding, the City Council provided savings to the property owners for the remaining life of the bond issue. The annual debt service payment to the bondholders was reduced from $77,691 for FY 2014/2015 to $73,923 for FY 2015/2016. This translates to a 4.85% overall reduction in the annual debt service payment FISCAL YEAR 2015-2016 CFD 2000-01 SOUTH ETIWANDA DESCRIPTION BUILDING SIZE ASSIGNED SPECIAL TAX 1. Residential Property > 2301 Sq Ft $283.66 2. Residential Property 1801 —2300 Sq Ft $269.48 3. Residential Property <1800 Sq Ft $241.11 Community Facilities District No. 2000-01 FY2015/2016 P72 Resolution No. 15-147 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: DEBT SERVICE $54,070.00 CITY AND TRUSTEE ADMINISTRATION, GENERAL OVERHEAD & LIABILITY, AND CONTRACT SERVICES $19,850.00 $73,920.00 SOURCES: INTEREST REVENUE $550.00 TRANSFER FROM FUND BALANCES $0.00 DELINQUENT TAXES $1,320.00 SPECIAL TAX $73,920.00 $75,790.00 Community Facilities District No. 2000-01 2 FY2015/2016 P73 o emu, clt Cs to O e o N ¢% z o•V i I c v ul $ • ° v� 3 \i' nV��� N 1 in swam Q `tdk., IN fil • m fD & ° ! ro 1 ,▪ti ® — � Ca AVlse3 i`n i i Iw88M3__ _ v AV Bpuemo •� / 1�°e U. g tlato Aea E nyiaIse1430 a � AVJaJSatpod ✓ �f ; nV Llano, r___ it_ nV uatpll!W I AV uaneH 1 'I� —1 — —0 uaneH nV esouuaH —('°I —— —�AV e90LLLaH I nVPIeaRPJV I I —/ nVPIeQ!4PV nV uewlIaH 1 ? ) 04r cr)Ay uewllaH I C ,Ect ° 19 uepawea i — -- Inv pieRau!A ' a 1i14�ig�:il er r c'd_r�.� n ems 'li�ri5I��,�1•In $ 0 m E t V `J IIHIil1;;s 0 A 8 a •+��tbit ce :Id CD LL lt;1nillh;1 `8 t ;1311!'3 .51i III111 Fad ill ill Community Facilities District No. 2000-01 3 FY2015/2016 P74 STAFF REPORT ' h ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES GROUP LJ Date: August 5, 2015 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager / From: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services 0 By: Chris Bopko, Management Analyst III Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-02 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK) WITH AN ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX REDUCTION DUE TO DISTRICT REFINANCING RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting an annual special tax levy for Community Facilities District No. 2000-02 (Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park). Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, the City Council is authorized to annually levy the special tax to pay debt service on the bonds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On November 7, 2000, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2000-02 (Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park) authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $6,835,000. On December 6, 2000, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 646 authorizing the levy of a special tax in the district. Bonds were issued on December 21, 2000 for the purpose of financing the acquisition of street improvements on public street improvements required as a condition of approval of development of the property within the proposed district including Milliken Avenue, Arrow Route and Foothill Boulevard with the street improvements to include but are not limited to demolition and grading, curb, gutter and sidewalks, traffic signals; entry feature and signs; fire hydrants; storm drains; water and sewer improvements; paving; striping; landscaping and irrigation improvements; public utilities and appurtenances. On December 7, 2011 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-179 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2011 in the principal amount of $5,407,000 were issued on December 21, 2011. On July 01, 2015 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 15-115 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District in conjunction with various other districts. The 2015 Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Various Communities Facilities Districts in the principal amount of $18,546,000 were issued on July 30, 2015. By authorizing this refunding, the City Council provided savings to the property owners for the remaining life of the bond issue. The annual debt service payment to the bondholders was reduced from $537,473 for FY 2014/2015 to $517,768 for FY 2015/2016. This translates to a 4.72% overall P75 CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL FAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-02 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK) WITH AN ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX REDUCTION DUE TO DISTRICT REFINANCING. AUGUST 5,2015 PAGIL 2 reduction in the annual debt service payment paid by property owners. For example, the FY 2014/15 commercial/industrial rate was $3,980.10/acre while the FY 2015/16 commercial/industrial rate will be $3,792.06/acre. The Special Tax shall be levied each Fiscal Year as follows: 1. The Special Tax shall be levied on each Taxable Parcel in an amount equal to 100% of the applicable Maximum Annual Special Tax; or 2. •If less monies are needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement, the Special Tax shall be levied proportionally on each Taxable Parcel at less than 100% of the Maximum Annual Special Tax. This Special Tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through fiscal year 2024-2025. Attachments 1. Resolution 2. Annual Status Report 3. Map P76 RESOLUTION NO. 15-148 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE- ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2000-2 (RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-2 (Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds were previously issued for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District (the "Prior Special Tax Bonds"); and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said District, and this legislative body, by the adoption of Resolution No. 15-128 on July 15, 2015, previously established the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year based, in part, upon the debt service payable on the Prior Special Tax Bonds; and WHEREAS, on July 30, 2015, special tax refunding bonds were issued by the Community Facilities District to refund the Prior Special Tax Bonds resulting a reduction in the debt service payable from the special taxes levied within the District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body desires to adjust the specific rate rates established in Resolution No. 15-128 to reflect the savings in debt service resulting from the issuance of the Special Tax Refunding Bonds. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year 2015-2016 for the District is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and P77 incorporated in the Annual Status Report August, 2015 which shall supersede and replace the Annual Status Report July, 2015. SECTION 3: That the rates as set forth in such Annual Status Report August, 2015 do not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and are not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness. B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of administering the District and any bonds of the District. D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the District funds, including but not limited to, any special tax fund, bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report August, 2015. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. P78 SECTION 9. This Resolution No. 15-148 shall supersede and replace Resolution No. 15-128. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of August, 2015. AYES: NOES: • ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of August, 2015. Executed this day of August, 2015 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P79 Resolution No. 15-148 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2000-02 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CORPORATE PARK ANNUAL STATUS REPORT AUGUST, 2015 P80 Resolution No. 15-148 BACKGROUND On November 7, 2000, the electors within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2000-02 (Rancho Cucamonga Corporate Park) authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $6,835,000 for the purpose of financing the acquisition of street improvements on public street improvements required as a condition of approval of development of the property within the proposed district including Milliken Avenue, Arrow Route and Foothill Boulevard; such street improvements to include but not to be limited to: demolition and grading, curb, gutter and sidewalks, traffic signals; entry feature and signs; fire hydrants; storm drains; water and sewer improvements; paving; striping; landscaping and irrigation improvements; public utilities and appurtenances. On December 7, 2011 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-179 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2011 in the principal amount of $5,407,000 were issued on December 21, 2011. On July 01, 2015 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 15-115 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The 2015 Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Various Communities Facilities Districts in the principal amount of $18,546,000 were issued on July 30, 2015. By authorizing this refunding, the City Council provided savings to the property owners for the remaining life of the bond issue. The annual debt service payment to the bondholders was reduced from $537,473 for FY 2014/2015 to $517,768 for FY 2015/2016. This translates to a 4.72% overall reduction in the annual debt service payment. Each July 1, commencing July 1, 2012 the Maximum Annual Special Tax will be increased by two percent (2%) of the amount in effect for the previous fiscal year. The Special Taxes will be levied as follows: (1) The Special Tax will be levied on each Taxable Parcel in an amount equal to 100% of the applicable Maximum Annual Special Tax; or (2) If the Special Tax Requirement will be satisfied by an amount less than the Maximum Annual Special Tax the Special Tax will be levied proportionately on each Taxable Parcel at less than 100% of the Maximum Annual Special Tax. Therefore, for FY 2015/2016 the current rate is sufficient to meet fiscal obligations and there is no need for an increase of the special tax by 2%. This special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through fiscal year 2024-2025. Community Facilities District No.2000-02 1 FY2015/2016 P81 Resolution No. 15-148 FISCAL YEAR 2015-2016 The annual tax rate for fiscal year 2015-2016 will be $3,792.06 per acre, and will provide sufficient funding for maintenance and operations in the amount of $517,768.00. COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: DEBT SERVICE $459,400.00 CITY AND TRUSTEE ADMINISTRATION, GENERAL OVERHEAD & LIABILITY, AND CONTRACT SERVICES $58,370.00 $517,770.00 SOURCES: INTEREST REVENUE $1,830.00 TRANSFER FROM FUND BALANCES $0.00 DELINQUENT TAXES $0.00 SPECIAL TAX $517,770.00 $519,600.00 $3,792.06 PER ACRE Community Facilities District No. 2000-02 2 FY2015/2016 P82 N O ice, ° A2 0 E o N a% •o .k o 0 (s d � d o y y o O Fe it el y - a, g nm fr Iv BPuBM!13 / Ay epueM!33 L..71 e f----i• C in .. 9)13a0 60 II 1 E ____..._1 nylalsatpoa ' -- E I 7 nyia,satpoa C I 1 ny ua�lllllvg r---�— `+— Ay ua>pll!W I I I AV UaneH I L --I — —Bny uanel4 Ay esoWJBH 1 --( { ` "iv esouuaH Ay PIBQ!4wV i i —� nb'Ple4!40N LI ny uewilaH — , ■ -4/ny uewllaH u) £ t 5 ° ny pJetatn^ IS memo _ I Lor.C3-4> II011;1 1 r• Iir ":12 man-s— nyemo .1 1111117° �L i c m i2 i y i i3 co 9= a� } i cc c m u_ g calk a) It;jnifilittfl!pj - § . ilj 11 J ; tt� 6Hi , a : Itift Community Facilities District No.2000-02 3 FY2015/2016 P83 ice-v4 STAFF REPORT h ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES GROUP Lit t RANCHO Date: August 5, 2015 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services`/'� By: Chris Bopko, Management Analyst III Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NOS. 1 & 2, SERIES A), WITH AN ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX REDUCTION DUE TO DISTRICT REFINANCING RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area Nos. 1 & 2), Series 2001-A. Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, the City Council is authorized to annually levy the special tax to pay debt service on the bonds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On June 20, 2001, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area Nos. 1 and 2), Series 2001-A authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $14,240,000. On August 15, 2001 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 01-019 authorizing the issuance of bonds. Bonds were issued on August 29, 2001 to share in the financing of public street improvements required for the development of the property within the District, including improvements to Day Creek Boulevard, Victoria Park Lane, Church Street, Foothill Boulevard, Baseline Road and Arbor Way, landscaping improvements within public right-of-way, storm drain and flood control improvements. On December 7, 2011 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-179 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2011 in the principal amount of$9,093,000 were issued on December 21, 2011. On July 01, 2015 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 15-115 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District in conjunction with various other districts. The 2015 Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Various Communities Facilities Districts in the principal amount of $18,546,000 were issued on July 30, 2015. By authorizing this refunding, the City Council provided savings to the property owners for the remaining life of the bond issue. The annual debt service payment to the bondholders was reduced from $762,607 for FY 2014/2015 to $670,441 for FY 2015/2016. This translates to a 12.09% overall P84 CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NOS. 1 & 2, SERIES A), WITH AN ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX REDUCTION DUE TO DISTRICT REFINANCING AUGUST 5,2015 PAGE 2 reduction in the annual debt service payment paid by property owners. For example, the FY 2014/15 single family rate was $1,296.30 while the FY 2015/16 rate will be $1,115.90 per single family dwelling. The special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through fiscal year 2030-2031. Attachments 1. Resolution 2. Annual Status Report 3. Map P85 RESOLUTION NO. 15-149 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE- ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1 AND IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 2) SERIES 2001-A FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 (Improvement Area No. 1 and Improvement Area No. 2) Series 2001-A (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds were previously issued for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District (the "Prior Special Tax Bonds"); and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said District, and this legislative body, by the adoption of Resolution No. 15-131 on July 15, 2015, previously established the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year based, in part, upon the debt service payable on the Prior Special Tax Bonds; and WHEREAS, on July 30, 2015, special tax refunding bonds were issued by the Community Facilities District to refund the Prior Special Tax Bonds resulting a reduction in the debt service payable from the special taxes levied within the District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body desires to adjust the specific rate rates established in Resolution No. 15-131 to reflect the savings in debt service resulting from the issuance of the Special Tax Refunding Bonds. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year 2015-2016 for the District is P86 hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report August, 2015 which shall supersede and replace the Annual Status Report July, 2015. SECTION 3: That the rates as set forth in such Annual Status Report August, 2015 do not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and are not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness. B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of administering the District and any bonds of the District. D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the District funds, including but not limited to, any special tax fund, bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report August, 2015. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected,• and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. P87 SECTION 9. This Resolution No. 15-149 shall supersede and replace Resolution No. 15-131. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this _day of August, 2015. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of August, 2015. Executed this day of August, 2015 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P88 Resolution No. 15-149 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 IMPROVEMENT AREA No. 1 AND No. 2 • SPECIAL TAX BONDS, SERIES 2001-A ANNUAL STATUS REPORT AUGUST, 2015 P89 Resolution No. 15-149 BACKGROUND On June 20, 2001, the electors within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area No. 1 and Improvement Area No. 2) authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $14,240,000 for the purpose of financing the acquisition and construction of the facilities which consist of Day Creek Boulevard, Victoria Park Lane, Church Street, Foothill Boulevard, Base Line Road and Arbor Way, storm drain and flood control facilities and water and sewer improvements to be owned and operated by Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The District is generally bordered on the north by Base Line Road, on the west by the Day Creek Flood Control Channel from Arrow Route to Foothill Boulevard and by the Southern California Edison right-of-way from Foothill Boulevard to Base Line Road, on the south by Interstate 15 and on the east by Etiwanda Avenue. Each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property within Improvement Area No. 1 and Improvement Area No. 2 shall be classified as Developed Property, Final Mapped Property, Taxable Property Owner Association Property, Taxable Public Property, or Undeveloped Property, and all such Taxable Property shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment pursuant to the sections below. The property in Improvement Area No. 1 is residential in use. The property in Improvement Area No. 2 is primarily commercial and contains Victoria Gardens. On December 7, 2011 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-179 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2011 in the principal amount of $9,093,000 were issued on December 21, 2011. The special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through fiscal year 2030-2031. On July 01, 2015 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 15-115 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The 2015 Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Various Communities Facilities Districts in the principal amount of $18,546,000 were issued on July 30, 2015. By authorizing this refunding, the City Council provided savings to the property owners for the remaining life of the bond issue. The annual debt service payment to the bondholders was reduced from $762,607 for FY 2014/2015 to $670,441 for FY 2015/2016. This translates to a 12.09% overall reduction in the annual debt service payment. • Community Facilities District No.2001-0IA 1 FY2015/2016 P90 Resolution No. 15-149 FISCAL YEAR 2015-2016 CFD 2001-01 IMPROVEMENT AREA No. 1 LAND USE RESIDENTIAL CLASS DESCRIPTION FLOOR AREA ASSIGNED SPECIAL TAX 1 Single Family Property => 3,250 Sq Ft $1,115.90 Per Dwelling Unit 2 Single Family Property 2,950 to 3,249 Sq Ft $894.84 Per Dwelling Unit 3 Single Family Property 2,650 to 2,949 Sq Ft $805.04 Per Dwelling Unit 4 Single Family Property 2,350 to 2,649 Sq Ft $691.32 Per Dwelling Unit 5 Single Family Property 2,150 to 2,349 Sq Ft $646.69 Per Dwelling Unit 6 Single Family Property 1,950 to 2,149 Sq Ft $594.61 Per Dwelling Unit 7 Single Family Property < 1,950 Sq Ft $498.43 Per Dwelling Unit 8 Apartment Property Not Applicable $125.94 Per Dwelling Unit 9 Non-Residential Not Applicable $4,462.52 Per Acre Property LAND USE CLASS DESCRIPTION ASSIGNED SPECIAL TAX 1 Apartment Property $125.94 Per Dwelling Unit 2 Other Residential Property 5,721.95 Per Acre 3 Non-Residential Property $0.33 Per Sq Ft. of Non-Residential Floor Area Community Facilities District No.2001-01A 2 FY2015/2016 P91 Resolution No.15-149 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: DEBT SERVICE $606,770.00 CITY AND TRUSTEE ADMINISTRATION, GENERAL OVERHEAD & LIABILITY, AND CONTRACT SERVICES $63,670.00 $670,440.00 SOURCES: INTEREST REVENUE $0.00 TRANSFER FROM FUND BALANCES $0.00 DELINQUENT TAXES $1,800.00 SPECIAL TAX $670,440.00 $672,240.00 Community Facilities District No.2001-01A 3 FY2015/2016 P92 Q O - - I le.. Q O p Cl) _ c NN . w A Q :� W > C N o L c I� ,5 .4. _ r � o 41; = U O o co▪ cJ 1' Ay NJat13 0 NQ v, CI 41 1 \s, ii. 10 g) to:5 L 8 s v, ° •,.. r J m ▪V I I g Q ';U I I L'� — =Av1Se3 (76 I v IAy epuem4 1 Ay epuemii3 I 3 I ` ��le I IUU- �8 �aaJ� Ae j E i _u—.— i Ay J81904)0):1 `--_:- O A Jaisaipoei V (/^. II Ay ua)11II!w r�— — . I I Av usquir, i Ay u,AeH -- — ---_. Ay esouuaH .. ° I - __. . i II esowJaH i II Ay Pleq!tpJy ' I V Ay Pleq!4oi`d Ay uewllaH i . i Ay uewllaH I f 1 f Z v l ! Al p e,tauin , IS ue!IeUJeO I ' —__- I II ti ��I �� ,--1.1 II se ,41s I— ..—aZ Ay aADJe ¢!!!!!! b�� i� � —�� _z ` 112 iii cc E2 >• III; 0a iii(' Falai, iii Community Facilities District No. 2001-01A 4 FY2015/2016 P93 STAFF REPORT Q49/ ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES GROUP RANCHO Date: August 5, 2015 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services By: Chris Bopko, Management Analyst III Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 3 ZONE 7), SERIES 2001-B WITH AN ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX REDUCTION DUE TO DISTRICT REFINANCING RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area No.3 Zone 7), Series 2001-B. Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, the City Council is authorized to annually levy the special tax to pay debt service on the bonds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On June 20, 2001, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area No.3 Zone 7), Series 2001-B authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $935,000. On August 15, 2001 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 01-019 authorizing the issuance of bonds. Bonds were issued on August 29, 2001 to share in the financing of public street improvements required for the development of the property within the District, including improvements to Day Creek Boulevard, Victoria Park Lane, Church Street, Foothill Boulevard, Baseline Road and Arbor Way, landscaping improvements within public right-of-way, storm drain and flood control improvements. On December 7, 2011 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-179 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2011 in the principal amount of$812,000 were issued on December 21, 2011. On July 01, 2015 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 15-115 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District in conjunction with various other districts. The 2015 Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Various Communities Facilities Districts in the principal amount of $18,546,000 were issued on July 30, 2015. By authorizing this refunding, the City Council provided savings to the property owners for the remaining life of the bond issue. The annual debt service payment to the bondholders was reduced from $65,590 for FY 2014/2015 to $61,467 for FY 2015/2016. This translates to a 6.29% overall P94 CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 3 ZONE 7), SERIES 2001-B WITH AN ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX REDUCTION DUE TO DISTRICT REFINANCING AUGUST 5,2015 PAGE 2 reduction in the annual debt service payment paid by property owners. For example, the FY 2014/15 commercial/industrial rate was $1,750.00/acre while the FY 2015/16 commercial/industrial rate will be $1,640.00/acre. The special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through fiscal year 2030-2031. Attachments 1. Resolution 2. Annual Status Report 3. Map P95 RESOLUTION NO. 15-150 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE- ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2001-01 (IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 3 ZONE 7) SERIES 2001-B FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 (Improvement Area No. 3 Zone 7) Series 2001-B (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds were previously issued for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District (the "Prior Special Tax Bonds"); and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said District, and this legislative body, by the adoption of Resolution No. 15-132 on July 15, 2015, previously established the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year based, in part, upon the debt service payable on the Prior Special Tax Bonds; and WHEREAS, on July 30, 2015, special tax refunding bonds were issued by the Community Facilities District to refund the Prior Special Tax Bonds resulting a reduction in the debt service payable from the special taxes levied within the District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body desires to adjust the specific rate rates established in Resolution No. 15-132 to reflect the savings in debt service resulting from the issuance of the Special Tax Refunding Bonds. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year 2015-2016 for the District is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and P96 incorporated in the Annual Status Report August, 2015 which shall supersede and replace the Annual Status Report July, 2015. SECTION 3: That the rates as set forth in such Annual Status Report August, 2015 do not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and are not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness. B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of administering the District and any bonds of the District. D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the District funds, including but not limited to, any special tax fund, bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report August, 2015. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. P97 SECTION 9. This Resolution No. 15-150 shall supersede and replace Resolution No. 15-132. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of August, 2015. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of August, 2015. Executed this day of August, 2015 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P98 Resolution No. 15-150 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2001-01 IMPROVEMENT AREA No. 3 SPECIAL TAX BONDS, SERIES 2001-B ANNUAL STATUS REPORT AUGUST, 2015 P99 Resolution No. 15-150 BACKGROUND On June 20, 2001, the electors within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 (Improvement Area No. 3) authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $935,000 for the purpose of financing the acquisition and construction of the facilities which consist of Day Creek Boulevard, Victoria Park Lane, Church Street, foothill Boulevard, Base Line Road and Arbor Way, storm drain and flood control facilities and water and sewer improvements to be owned and operated by Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The District is generally bordered on the north by Base Line Road, on the west by the Day Creek Flood Control Channel from Arrow Route to Foothill Boulevard and by the Southern California Edison right-of-way from Foothill Boulevard to Base Line Road, on the south by Interstate 15 and on the east by Etiwanda Avenue. Each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property within each Zone of Improvement Area No. 3 shall be classified as Taxable or Non-Taxable Property and all such Taxable Property shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment pursuant to the section below. On December 7, 2011 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-179 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2011 in the principal amount of $812,000 were issued on December 21, 2011. The special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through fiscal year 2030-2031. On July 01, 2015 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 15-115 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The 2015 Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Various Communities Facilities Districts in the principal amount of $18,546,000 were issued on July 30, 2015. By authorizing this refunding, the City Council provided savings to the property owners for the remaining life of the bond- issue. The annual debt service payment to the bondholders was reduced from $65,590 for FY 2014/2015 to $61,467 for FY 2015/2016. This translates to a 6.29% overall reduction in the annual debt service payment. Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 B 1 FY2015/2016 P100 FISCAL YEAR 2015-2016 CFD2001-01 IMPROVEMENT AREA No. 3 TAXABLE ACREAGE BOND SHARE ASSIGNED TAX PER ACRE ZONE 1-FUTURE RDA 55.00 91.70% $1,640.00 ZONE 7-LEGGIO 42.74 8.30% $1,640.00 Resolution No.15-150 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: DEBT SERVICE $58,070.00 CITY AND TRUSTEE ADMINISTRATION, GENERAL OVERHEAD & LIABILITY, AND CONTRACT SERVICES $3,400.00 $61,470.00 SOURCES: INTEREST REVENUE $0.00 TRANSFER FROM FUND BALANCES $0.00 DELINQUENT TAXES $0.00 SPECIAL TAX $61,470.00 $61,470.00 Community Facilities District No. 2001-01 B 2 FY2015/2016 P101 m N czb m p O w N N oc w Q w. w =" Lc, !^ a n Cl), (/) AV UiayO 0 ;a y c .� I In m it;s Pi £ 2 •„,.., m g V RI I u_ M— —)Ay ISe3 cn v� IAy epueMR3 L-1Av epueA113 i INN, E 19 law° Red I O ny Jaisayooa I A 19)sayo08 ,.� 1 I Ay u... r� -- � 1,ua)HIIIW 1 1 1 ny uaneH !- - -, _ 1 — _. • i 1 n uaneH Ay eSOLUJ I - 4it1F - - — 1 J ny esow I 1 Ay pleq!4oiy I i - i _—.. In legl 1 1 I Iry p 4o y AV uew��aH - - ,...'• Ay uel-UPH cn 1 �° U)v ft- 1 i N p ,tuin S ueueo --.-- 1i� �� a c S I J •' m/ AV 9A0.10 i f�j q! i_ !i 8 L .te n'• 3 ii"'"iiiii a :iii - = Will! !I w Community Facilities District No.2001-01B 3 FY2015/2016 P102 STAFF REPORT is ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES GROUP 1--%1° RANCHO Date: August 5, 2015 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services By: Chris Bopko, Management Analyst III Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-01 (VINTNER'S GROVE) WITH AN ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX REDUCTION DUE TO DISTRICT REFINANCING. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2006-01 (Vintner's Grove). Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, the City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate to pay debt service on the bonds. There is no increase from the current tax rate for FY 2015-2016. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On October 18, 2006, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2006-01 authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of$5,800,000. On November 1, 2006, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 769 approving the levy of the special tax, and on December 20, 2006 approved Resolution No. 06- 401 authorizing the issuance of bonds. The District boundary is located on the south side of Arrow Route, east of Center Street, north of 261h Street and west of Haven Avenue. Bonds were issued on January 25, 2007 to share in the provision of funds for the acquisition and of street improvements, landscape improvements within the public right-of-way, and water and sewer improvements. On July 01, 2015 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 15-115 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District in conjunction with various other districts. The 2015 Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Various Communities Facilities Districts in the principal amount of $18,546,000 were issued on July 30, 2015. By authorizing this refunding, the City Council provided savings to the property owners for the remaining life of the bond issue. The annual debt service payment to the bondholders was reduced from $464,646 for FY 2014/2015 to $288,959 for FY 2015/2016. This translates to a 37.85% overall reduction in the annual debt service payment paid by property owners. For example, the FY 2014/15 single family rate was $3,687.00 while the FY 2015/16 rate will be $2,291.39 per single family dwelling. The reason for such a large savings is due to the higher interest rate environment that existed in 2006 when these bonds were sold. P1O3 CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-01 (VINTNER'S GROVE) WITH AN ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX REDUCTION DUE TO DISTRICT REFINANCING AUGUST 5,2015 PAGE 2 This special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through fiscal year 2036-2037. Attachments 1. Resolution 2. Annual Status Report 3. Map P104 RESOLUTION NO. 15-151 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE- ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2006-01 (VINTNER'S GROVE) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-01 (Vintner's Grove) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds were previously issued for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District (the "Prior Special Tax Bonds"); and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said District, and this legislative body, by the adoption of Resolution No. 15-136 on July 15, 2015, previously established the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year based, in part, upon the debt service payable on the Prior Special Tax Bonds; and WHEREAS, on July 30, 2015, special tax refunding bonds were issued by the Community Facilities District to refund the Prior Special Tax Bonds resulting a reduction in the debt service payable from the special taxes levied within the District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body desires to adjust the specific rate rates established in Resolution No. 15-136 to reflect the savings in debt service resulting from the issuance of the Special Tax Refunding Bonds. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year 2015-2016 for the District is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and P105 incorporated in the Annual Status Report August, 2015 which shall supersede and replace the Annual Status Report July, 2015. SECTION 3: That the rates as set forth in such Annual Status Report August, 2015 do not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and are not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness. B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of administering the District and any bonds of the District. D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the District funds, including but not limited to, any special tax fund, bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report August, 2015. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. P106 SECTION 9. This Resolution No. 15-151 shall supersede and replace Resolution No. 15-136. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of August, 2015. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of August, 2015. Executed this day of August, 2015 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P107 Resolution No. 15-151 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-01 VINTNER'S GROVE ANNUAL STATUS REPORT AUGUST, 2015 P108 Resolution No. 15-151 BACKGROUND On October 18, 2006, the electors within the boundary of Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 2006-01 authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the maximum principal amount of $5,800,000 for the purpose of financing the acquisition and construction of the facilities which consist of street improvements, landscaping improvements located in public right-of-way, fee related improvements such as transportation, beautification, parks and recreation and drainage, water capacity, water meter and sewer connection fees and water and sewer improvements to be owned and operated by Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The District is located south of Arrow Route, east of Center Avenue, north of 26th Street and west of Haven Avenue. On July 01, 2015 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 15-115 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The 2015 Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Various Communities Facilities Districts in the principal amount of $18,546,000 were issued on July 30, 2015. By authorizing this refunding, the City Council provided savings to the property owners for the remaining life of the bond issue. The annual debt service payment to the bondholders was reduced from $464,646 for FY 2014/2015 to $288,959 for FY 2015/2016. This translates to a 37.85% overall reduction in the annual debt service payment. Each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property within CFD No. 2006-01 shall be classified as Developed Property or Undeveloped Property, and shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment determined pursuant to the section below. FISCAL YEAR 2015-2016 CFD 2006-01 VINTNER'S GROVE Floor Plan Home Size SQ. FT. Number of Units Special Tax Tri-Plex Plan 1 1335 26 $ 1,444.32 Tri-Plex Plan 2 1803 26 $ 1,664.32 Tri-Plex Plan 3 1920 26 $ 1,723.98 SFD Plan 4 2188 28 $ 1,932.18 SFD Plan 5 2627 28 $ 2,099.98 SFD Plan 6 3173 22 $ 2,291.39 156 Community Facilities District No.2006-01 1 FY2015/2016 P109 Resolution No. 15-151 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: DEBT SERVICE $263,680.00 CITY AND TRUSTEE ADMINISTRATION, GENERAL OVERHEAD & LIABILITY, AND CONTRACT SERVICES $25,280.00 $288,960.00 SOURCES: INTEREST REVENUE $6,690.00 TRANSFER FROM FUND BALANCES $0.00 DELINQUENT TAXES $2,500.00 SPECIAL TAX $288,960.00 $298,150.00 Community Facilities District No.2006-01 2 FY2015/2016 P110 O (0 O .t o CM o 0 7 ny duay0 o▪H ` �\ 1ik ci to c o i . Ilk' m cc- = $2▪1.. 8 ie I � in I.L. ' I AV e 'Ay epueMB3 / Ay ePueMI13 I _ Ili.�' B Z ' E I yaatalea i y....�mila Eny aalss, '" ny aalsatpoa O \) 1 II uaneH i 1 (; — + —i AV ny uaneH Ay esounaH I r git 7 ny esouuaH ny PIeq!Kpay I 1 j!'i ■ I I JAVPIRaILPJV ny uew!!aH i rn Ay uewllaH 1- U , � Ay PieAau!n , _fig t A 11111 GIN, J I ..---4 _� nyanwa 1!'i 8e°�°1 ,/ to c f0 [� to 111°111' +d a 8 d� Ill�Iri.1i�i 8 '� r. a ilfiuillui Community Facilities District No.2006-01 3 FY2015/2016 P111 STAFF REPORT tosio ADMINISTRATIVE"SERVICES GROUP LJ RANCHO Date: August 5, 2015 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager //�� From: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services+/ By: Chris Bopko, Management Analyst III Subject: CONSIDERTION OF APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-02 (AMADOR ON ROUTE 66) WITH AN ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX REDUCTION DUE TO DISTRICT REFINANCING. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution setting the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 2006-02 (Amador on Route 66). Pursuant to Section 53340 and 53358 of the Government Code Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, the City Council is authorized to annually levy the tax rate to pay debt service on the bonds. There is no increase from the current tax rate for FY 2015-2016. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On October 18, 2006, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 2006-02 authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $2,980,000. On November 1, 2006, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 770 approving the levy of the special tax, and on December 20, 2006 approved Resolution No. 06- 402 authorizing the issuance of bonds. The District boundary is located south of Garcia Drive, east of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard and west of East Avenue. Bonds were issued on January 25, 2007 to share in the provision of funds for the acquisition of street improvements, landscape improvements within the public right-of-way, and water and sewer improvements. On July 01, 2015 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 15-115 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District in conjunction with various other districts. The 2015 Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Various Communities Facilities Districts in the principal amount of $18,546,000 were issued on July 30, 2015. By authorizing this refunding, the City Council provided savings to the property owners for the remaining life of the bond issue. The annual debt service payment to the bondholders was reduced from $255,882 for FY 2014/2015 to $183,158 for FY 2015/2016. This translates to a 28.42% overall reduction in the annual debt service payment paid by property owners. For example, the FY 2014/15 single family rate was $2,816.00 while the FY 2015/16 rate will be $2,015.67 per single family dwelling. The reason for such a large savings is due to the higher interest rate environment that existed in 2006 when these bonds were sold. P112 CONSIDERTION OF APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-02 (AMADOR ON ROUTE 66)WITH AN ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX REDUCTION DUE TO DISTRICT REFINANCING. AUGUST 5,2015 PAG12 This special tax shall be levied only so long as required for each parcel of taxable property to discharge bond obligations through fiscal year 2036-2037. Attachments 1. Resolution 2. Annual Status Report 3. Map P113 RESOLUTION NO. 15-152 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE- ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2006-02 (AMADOR ON ROUTE 66) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-02 (Amador on Route 66) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds were previously issued for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District (the "Prior Special Tax Bonds"); and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said District, and this legislative body, by the adoption of Resolution No. 15-137 on July 15, 2015, previously established the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year based, in part, upon the debt service payable on the Prior Special Tax Bonds; and WHEREAS, on July 30, 2015, special tax refunding bonds were issued by the Community Facilities District to refund the Prior Special Tax Bonds resulting a reduction in the debt service payable from the special taxes levied within the District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body desires to adjust the specific rate rates established in Resolution No. 15-137 to reflect the savings in debt service resulting from the issuance of the Special Tax Refunding Bonds. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year 2015-2016 for the District is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and P114 incorporated in the Annual Status Report August, 2015 which shall supersede and replace the Annual Status Report July, 2015. SECTION 3: That the rates as set forth in such Annual Status Report August, 2015 do not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and are not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. SECTION 4: That the proceeds of the special tax are used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, in the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness. B. Necessary replenishment of bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of administering the District and any bonds of the District. D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECTION 5: The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorem taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax. SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the District funds, including but not limited to, any special tax fund, bond fund and reserve fund. SECTION 7: The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report August, 2015. SECTION 8: The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or amounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. P115 SECTION 9. This Resolution No. 15-152 shall supersede and replace Resolution No. 15-137. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this _ day of August, 2015. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of August, 2015. Executed this day of August, 2015 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P116 • Resolution No. 15-152 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2006-02 AMADOR ON ROUTE 66 ANNUAL STATUS REPORT AUGUST, 2015 P117 Resolution No. 15-152 BACKGROUND On October 18, 2006, the electors within the boundary of Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 2006-02 authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the maximum principal amount of$2,980,000 to provide financing for a portion of the cost of for the acquisition and construction of the facilities which consist of street and transportation, landscaping, dry utilities, parks and recreation, drainage, water and sewer in addition to the engineering, design, planning, permitting and construction, coordination, together with other incidental costs. The District is located south of Garcia Drive, east of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard and west of East Avenue. On July 01, 2015 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 15-115 authorizing the issuance of special tax refunding bonds for this District. The 2015 Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Various Communities Facilities Districts in the principal amount of $18,546,000 were issued on July 30, 2015. By authorizing this refunding, the City Council provided savings to the property owners for the remaining life of the bond issue. The annual debt service payment to the bondholders was reduced from $255,882 for FY 2014/2015 to $183,158 for FY 2015/2016. This translates to a 28.42% overall reduction in the annual debt service payment. Each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property within CFD No. 2006-02 shall be classified as Developed Property, Taxable Public Property, Taxable Property Owner Association Property or Undeveloped Property, and shall be subject to the levy of Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment determined pursuant to the section below. • Community Facilities District No. 2006-02 1 FY2015/2016 P118 FISCAL YEAR 2015-2016 CFD 2006-02 AMADOR ON ROUTE 66 Land Use Residential Floor Assigned Special # of Class Description Area Tax Units 1 Single Family < 1,850 Sq. Ft. $2,015.67 per unit 33 Detached Property 2 Single Family 1,601 - 1,850 Sq. $1,930.49 per unit 33 Detached Property Ft. 3 Single Family , 1,351 - 1,600 Sq. $1,767.30 per unit 0 Detached Property Ft. 4 Single Family >1,351 Sq. Ft. $1,604.09 per unit 33 Detached Property 5 Non-Residential N/A $46,345.90 per 0 Property acre Community Facilities District No. 2006-02 2 FY2015/2016 P119 Resolution No. 15-152 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS USES: DEBT SERVICE $157,860.00 CITY AND TRUSTEE ADMINISTRATION, GENERAL OVERHEAD & LIABILITY, AND CONTRACT SERVICES $25,300.00 $183,160.00 SOURCES: INTEREST REVENUE $3,680.00 TRANSFER FROM FUND BALANCES $0.00 DELINQUENT TAXES $12,500.00 SPECIAL TAX $183,160.00 $199,340.00 Community Facilities District No.2006-02 3 FY2015/2016 P120 N d O i Lq N o t o CM o Ste Q<•` C U U ® e, U 0 o w $ i AV Auag3 J o y • --- J ' N II 3 8 LI ae ▪V � 'le I r ' 7nyise3 55 I▪L cr vN 'Ay epuemp3 i AV aPosm113 ear A C Eny iassatpoa 0 ` I AY ia7satpoa U nyueviHn — ...I--�� I — �— IntluaVll!W 1 0 1 9 Ay uaneH I— —OAy u9ABH ny esoLW BH ) l Ay esouuaH Ay PIeglUwtl 1 • Ay PIeQ!4ytl Ay uewpaH I I -Ay uewlleH f ° A AV PJoAau!n IS uellaweo l \ IIHIHtI:g�1 ;1 m 7 � Ay°nolo � iil lliyi cc a m !IillhiiIIori;� a c0 Sig 11 he Community Facilities District No.2006-02 4 FY2015/2016 P121 STAFF REPORT Pest PLANNINGDEPARTMENT I LVS—I Date: August 5, 2015 RANCHO To: Mayor and Members of the City Council CUCAMONGA John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director By: Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planner Subject: Consideration of approval of Amendment No. 2 (Contract CO#15-043) with Pacific Municipal Consultants/Michael Baker International for contract planning services in an amount not to exceed $50,000 to be funded from Account 1001314-5300 (Contract Services) as approved in the FY 2015-2016 budget RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Amendment No. 2 with Pacific Municipal Consultants/Michael Baker International for contract planning services as approved in the FY 2015-2016 budget. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: On February 17, 2015 the City entered into a contract with Pacific Municipal Consultants (PMC) for contract planning services. The Planning Department has a short term need for contract planning services to assist while filling an open position. As part of the fiscal year 2015-2016 budget, the Planning Department was granted $50,000 to continue contract planning services while filling another open position. Staff has been satisfied with the services provided by PMC over the last five months and would like to extend the contract to provide continuity of service. The contract amendment includes two provisions. The first provision is to recognize that PMC was recently acquired by Michael Baker International and that all responsibilities of the contract will be assumed by Michael Baker International. The second provision is to increase the total contract amount by $50,000. The previous contract amount has almost been expended. Respectfully submitted, f Candyce rnett Planning Director CB:JN/Is P122 STAFF REPORT 'h PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DEPARTMENT LJ Date: August 5, 2015 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director By: Ty Quaintance, Facilities Superintendent Ken Fung, Assistant Engineer Subject: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "PUBLIC SAFETY IAQ HVAC PROJECT" AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS", TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 1017701-5650/1893017-0 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council approve the plans and specifications for the "Public Safety IAQ HVAC Project" and authorize the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids", to be funded from account no. 1017701-5650/1893017-0. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On May 21, 2014 City Council approved a qualified vendor list for mechanical engineering services to provide mechanical engineering services on an "as needed" basis. JC Chang and Associates were selected from the approved qualified vendors list and entered into a contract with the City to provide mechanical engineering services on an "as needed" basis. In July of 2014, JC Chang and Associates performed an evaluation of the existing HVAC system located in the mechanical room of the Public Safety building adjacent to the underground parking structure. Based on JC Chang and Associates' site investigation and recommendations, plans and specifications were developed to modify the entrance to the Public Safety mechanical room in order to prevent any possible IAQ issues in the interior of the Public Safety building. The project was previously advertised but the bids were rejected on June 5, 2015 as non- responsive to the City's needs because the bids received far exceeded the engineer's estimate. Since then, the scope of the project has been revised and a new budget prepared. Legal advertising is scheduled for August 11, 2015 and August 18, 2015, with a bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, September 1, 2015, unless extended by addenda. A mandatory pre-bid job walk is scheduled at 9:30 a.m. on Thursday, August 20, 2015. Staff anticipates awarding a contract on October 7, 2015 and completion of the project by end of 2015. Respectfully,submitted, t ll William Wittkopf Public Works Services Director WW/tq:kf P123 RESOLUTION NO. 15-153 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS FOR "PUBLIC SAFETY IAQ HVAC PROJECT" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that the specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the "PUBLIC SAFETY IAQ HVAC PROJECT". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on September 1, 2015, sealed bids or proposals for the "PUBLIC SAFETY IAQ HVAC PROJECT" in said City: A mandatory pre-bid meeting is scheduled on Thursday, August 20, 2015 at 9:30 a.m., at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. Refer to Item "0. Pre-Bid Meeting" of the "Instructions to Bidders" of the bid documents for approximate directions. Attendees are required to sign in at the pre-bid meeting. Bids from companies that did not have a representative sign in at the pre-bid meeting will be rejected. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of PUBLIC SAFETY IAQ HVAC PROJECT". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk, City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. They can also be Resolution No. 15-153 - Page 1 of 4 found at www.dir.ca.gov/ under the "Statistics and Research" Tab. The Contracting Agency also P124 shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. No contractor or subcontractor may be listed on a bid proposal for a public works project (submitted on or after March 1, 2015) unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5 (with limited exceptions from this requirement for bid purposes only under Labor Code section 1771.1(a)). • No contractor or subcontractor may be awarded a contract for public work on a public works project (awarded on or after April 1, 2015) unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5. This project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations. For all new projects awarded on or after April 1, 2015, the contractors and subcontractors must furnish electronic certified payroll records to the Labor Commissioner. The requirement to furnish electronic certified payroll records to the Labor Commissioner will apply to all public works projects, whether new or ongoing, beginning January 1, 2016. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than two hundred dollars ($200.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or • D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. Resolution No. 15-153 - Page 2 of 4 The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections P125 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor or Subcontractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each worker employed in the execution of the contract by the respective contractor or subcontractor for each calendar day during which the worker is required or permitted to work more than 8 hours in any one calendar day and 40 hours in any one calendar week in violation of the provisions of this article. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.1. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. • The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; including, but not limited to, a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Resolution No. 15-153 - Page 3 of 4 Cucamonga, California. P126 In an effort to go green and paperless, digital copies of the plans, specifications, and bid proposal, including any future addenda or revisions to the bid documents, are available by going to www.ciplist.com and signing up, by going to Member Login or Member Signup (it's free), then choose California, then scroll down to San Bernardino County and click on Browse Cities, then scroll down to Rancho Cucamonga and click on City Projects, then click on the Project of interest under the Title and follow directions for download. Note, copies of the plans, specifications, bid proposal, addendums and revisions will not be provided, digital copies must be downloaded from the above website then printed. Prospective bidders must register for an account on www.ciplist.com to be included on the prospective bidder's list(s) and to receive email updates of any addenda or revisions to the bid documents. Be advised that the information contained on this site may change over time and without notice to prospective bidders or registered users. While effort is made to keep information current and accurate and to notify registered prospective bidders of any changes to the bid documents, it is the responsibility of each prospective bidder to register with www.ciplist.com and to check this website on a DAILY basis through the close of bids for any applicable addenda or updates. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to registered prospective bidders from www.ciplist.com. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, reserves the right to reject any or all bids. Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for "PUBLIC SAFETY IAQ HVAC PROJECT" may be directed to: Ty Quaintance and Ken Fung Facilities Superintendent Assistant Engineer 8794 Lion Street 8794 Lion Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 477-2730, ext. 4148 (909) 477-2730 ext. 4139 (e-mail at ty.quaintance @CityofRC.us) (e-mail at kenneth.fung @cityofrc.us) All questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids must be in writing (e-mail is acceptable) and received by the City no later than 5:00 pm on Monday, August 24, 2015. The City is not responsible for questions undeliverable. ADVERTISE ON: PUBLISH DATES: August 11, 2015 and August 18, 2015 Resolution No. 15-153 - Page 4 of 4 • ce374 P127 STAFF REPORT s ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT L Date: August 5, 2015 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Carlo Cambare, Engineering Technician Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 18741 LOCATED ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD FROM THE NORTH TRACT BOUNDARY TO WILSON AVENUE AND ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF WILSON AVENUE FROM WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD TO THE WEST TRACT BOUNDARY, SUBMITTED BY PULTE GROUP. RECOMMENDATION • The required landscape improvements for Tract 18741 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS As a condition of approval of completion of Tract 18741, located along the east side of Wardman Bullock Road from the north tract boundary to Wilson Avenue and along the north side of Wilson Avenue from Wardman Bullock Road to the west tract boundary, the applicant was required to install related public improvements. All public landscape improvements required of this development have been completed to the standards of the City. Pulte Group obtained control of Centex Homes of California, LLC. Developer: Pulte Group 27101 Puerta Real, Suite 300, Mission Viejo, CA 92691 Respect submitted, Mark A. Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS:CC/rlf Attachment ( C P128 City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division Vicinity Map ,-,� PROJECT yz yZ a S1TE cG T m cn r WILSON AVE. 1 �,i SUMMIT AVE. ' WILSON AV o Li Q cri W 2 U BANYAN STREET o / c) . zi m C) n / Z - V 1 — P �� � ��____,_.7...... . 1,1____,--- N A Wye— E S Item: Ti?ACT /87 4 Title: VICINITY MAP P129 RESOLUTION NO. 15-154 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC LANSDCAPE IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 18741 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public landscape improvements for TRACT 18741 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. RESOLUTION NO 15-154 — Page 1 P130 cr9/4 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT LJ Date: August 5, 2015 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Carlo Cambare, Engineering Technician Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, ACCEPTA MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16324 LOCATED AT THE NORTHERLY END OF WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD, SUBMITTED BY MERITAGE HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, INC. RECOMMENDATION The required improvements for Tract 16324 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion accept a Maintenance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS As a condition of approval of completion of Tract 16324, located at the northerly end of Wardman Bullock Road, the applicant was required to install related public improvements. All public improvements required of this development have been completed to the standards of the City. The public improvements will be re-inspected in approximately nine months prior to release of the maintenance bond. Developer: Meritage Homes of California, Inc. 1250 Corona Pointe Court, Suite 210 Corona, CA 92879 Release: Faithful Performance Bond #5039027 $1,277,800.00 (street & storm drain) (Bond No.) Accept: Maintenance Bond #1117632 $ 127,780.00 (street & storm drain) (Bond No.) Respe ubmitted, Mark A. Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS:CC/rlf Attachment ^� 3 P13 0) SITE LOCATION - � cc a o WILSON (a ir AV ¢ 5'C• Q o BANYAN RANCHO 3 v) Lc, CUCAMONGA FONTANA Q �b HIGHLAND AVE A N CITY OF ITEM: _,077Acer_46924 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: V/C//Vl7°Y/J,P ENGINEERING DIVISION P132 RESOLUTION NO. 15-155 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16324 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public landscape improvements for TRACT 16324 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. RESOLUTION NO 15-155 — Page 1 P133 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT L� J Date: August 5, 2015 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Carlo Cambare, Engineering Technician Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO RELEASE THE MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR PARCEL MAP 19043, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF AMBER LANE, 370' WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE CENTERLINE, SUBMITTED WILLIAMS CONSTRUCTION & BACKHOE SERVICE, INC. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond, for Parcel Map 19043, located on the north side of Amber Lane, 370' west of Etiwanda Avenue centerline, submitted Williams Construction & Backhoe Service, Inc.. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER: Williams Construction & Backhoe Service, Inc. 9988 Almond Street Alta Loma, CA 91737 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond #71331910 $4,320.00 Respectful) submitted, Mark A. Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS:CC/rlf Attachment r P134 VICINTY MAP PARCELP MAP 19043 " t r - 2'3 rd&t .., ,-,. 4n t i f I. " p m ' '` s 4 9O43 'A 5 bee Ln _. '' .., , - , r. : . . ..... . , , ... , ... ,. ._ ..., , ,s : ol, .,. . , ., ill, i 4 X44.: - e ^ r t .- ' . , -c , fi ,'.4''''',-"'''''''.44V'''''''''''.'''':. s -"Shasta DrR :m P135 ce STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT LINO RANCHO Date: August 5, 2015 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering nyServices/City Engineer By: Romeo M. David, Associate Engineer )04-- Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer sit Subject: CONSIDERATION TO ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT FOR THE BASE BID AND ALTERNATE BID ITEMS 1-3, IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,327,795.10, TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIVE BIDDER, ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT, AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $132,779.51, FOR THE 4TH STREET FROM ARCHIBALD AVENUE TO HAVEN AVENUE, 7TH STREET FROM ARCHIBALD AVENUE TO HELLMAN AVENUE AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE FROM 4T" STREET TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECTS TO BE FUNDED FROM GAS TAX RT7360 AND MEASURE I FUNDS, ACCOUNT NOS. 1177303- 5650/1852177-0, 1176303-5650/1853176-0 AND 1174303-5650/1876174-0 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract for the base bid and Alternate bid items 1-3, in the amount of$1,327,795.10, to the lowest responsive bidder, All American Asphalt, and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of$132,779.51, for the 4t" Street from Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue, 7th Street from Archibald Avenue to Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue from 4th Street to Foothill Boulevard Pavement Rehabilitation Projects to be funded from Gas Tax RT7360 and Measure I Funds, Account Nos. 1177303-5650/1852177-0, 1176303-5650/1853176-0 and 1174303- 5650/1876174-0. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on July 7, 2015, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate for the base bid was $1,461,191.50. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found all to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds the lowest responsive bidder meets the requirements of the bid documents. The scope of work consists of cold milling, crack sealing, Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix overlay, adjusting existing manholes and valves to new grade, traffic loops replacement or installation of traffic signal video detection and striping. The contract documents call for seventy (70) working days to complete this construction. Res. - .miffed, 15 ri Mark A. Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Ps ALMOND ST – p ALMOND n ` _ 1■ V HILLSIDE RD. ` ICJ 11 Wi LS 11 VALSDN AVE. \ i AttLI1L 1 Jitt l III 111 4 ._ • •• i HIGHLAND AVE. HIGHLAND AVE _. I I Ia I I_ IlQISI_ Lath sr. t . IGth Sr. ! I It NSrA ST. LIONIE III . rAI RADNr UPLAND • BASEUHE AVE 6 ; 1■ _ R�!n/ ROAD _.—.-- —. i. r < N % ZR4 OIVRGH ST. 3 �� s C. b ft ERNARDO .�: I ��. .0 �ji3h��—I BLw. ` iN`�u e 9 -r �;3 _ ill r-L-7BAN , ,, 4 ..i.... DD6N ST. El ' JERSEY BLVD. I ■ - ► _ i ,t '" !Rh • —1I au STREET ..v.... V:i (i 4 §� N STREET� j STREET 4 II W VP i PROJECT * SITE -� '` rya N. Mh i STREET IL lip I�_ODC.AIONGA �)CAUSIl BARN ® I-1D rREEwAT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA / 1\ 4th St. (Archibald Ave. to Haven Ave.), I- , ',l tx\ A 7th St. Hellman Ave. to Archibald Ave. and \•`�� Archibald Ave. (4th St to Foothill Blvd) Pavement Rehabilitation J P137 STAFF REPORT !.(44, ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: August 5, 2015 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Jerry A. Dyer, Principal Civil Engineer 'l Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer a.T��l Subject: CONSIDERATION TO RELEASE MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND NO. 1001009152 IN THE AMOUNT OF $15,075.89, FOR THE FY 2012/2013 SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS FOR BUS STOPS AT 51 LOCATIONS, CONTRACT NO. 13-294 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. 1001009152 in the amount of$15,075.89, for the FY 2012/2013 Sidewalk Improvements for Bus Stops at 51 Locations, contract No. 13-294. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Contractor: New Legacy Development Corp. P. O. Box 1917 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Respectfully submitted, Mark A. Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/JAD/SH:ls P138 VICINITY MAP SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS FOR BUS STOPS AT 51 LOCATIONS FY 12/13 PROJECT Project Sites • ;Fs: d ( E :.:a-.q..o 0, 'g r`( \Q�j ` , L` Almond Rd l " '. / J ; ... m 3 w t.>.> f " Z' *fie_ Hillside Rd -tt .1 ` 1 I I :L,_ I m m r. 5 e Y, L: I r" j J, '2,1,, Sir. WIi.. AY I L V.y. -` ��® - �Li„TI W L.i r4<. `.Wilson Av Banyan St\ 7:77 I 1 . \':. .•�®I INI t 1 - JQ�', ..,g' ij \."'� �II®®� to 1)0)� ® i 210 Freeway 19th St ®rn-wr� -orb s I� � -��.•!.3 .Enw_.,Highland Av i. r Base Line Rd " �� }rl ® Y7�� ase Line Rd Foothl11,B1 s °�lf� ® ` r'rreiou ftR aj +tir 3 11.°'reaE�ra IFjoothill'�L:: Arrow Rf ����_ �® -v 1 ;Arrow ,. • 8thgS;c®∎B� J L__i. -- - - 10Freeway I>_=jL "Z Ma_, 1111-71 F'` — — Q Btft s �. f 1. �. '• Ir a-k -4 4. , 5: ;--- ,.-, ; , ;: - 4th St so g € `f '�.•. . :10 Freeway Lu e il • • STAFF REPORT �t, P139 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: August 5, 2015 d RANCHO To: Mayor and Members of the City Council CUCAMONGA John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Trina Valdez, Management Analyst I Subject: CONSIDERATION TO ACCEPT THE SOLAR CARPORT SYSTEM INSTALLATION AT THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY HALL, CONTRACT NO. 15-035 AS COMPLETE, RELEASE THE BONDS, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND, AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $342,964.00 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the Solar Carport System Installation at the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Hall, Contract No. 15-035, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, authorize the release of the Labor and Material Bond in the amount of $313,731.00 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $17,148.21 35 days after acceptance. Also approve the final contract amount of$342,964.00. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The Solar Carport System Installation at the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Hall project scope of work consisted of installation of a carport structure, solar photovoltaic (PV) system, PV system interconnection with existing main building switchgear and lighting. Pertinent information of the project is as follows: > Account Numbers: 1705303-5309, 1706303-5209, 1025001-5607 > City Council Approval to Advertise: November 5, 2014 > Publish dates for local paper: November 11, 2014 and November 18, 2014 > Bid Opening: December 16, 2014 > Contract Award Date: February 4, 2015 > Low Bidder: MD Energy, Inc. > Contract Amount: $313,731.00 > 10% Contingency: $31,373.10 • Final Contract Amount: $342,964.00 > Difference in Contract Amount: <$29,233.00> <(8.52%)> P140 City Council Staff Report - Solar Carport System Installation at the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Hall August 5, 2015 Page 2 • The net increase in the total cost of the project is a result of four (4) Contract Change Orders. The notable changes that were significant to the increase of the contract amount was an increase in quantity of conduit to accommodate any future equipment or expansion, additional demolition work needed to remove the existing concrete curb islands and tree stumps to allow for the pavement overlay, and additional sandblasting and construction work needed on the concrete columns. Respectfully submitted, • Mark A. Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS:TV Attachment(s) • PJ\41 ALMOND ST ND ST $ \ II 42 DLSIDE IA. ` / AD 3I� y1 MLTDN AVE YICLSON AV l BANYAN ST. a 1[ ' 1 I 11 1 L AVE ,m 1 ����fff ° Cy) AO AVE 1 I I HIGHLAND AVE �Gila�I 210 ii -.„ , P I V HIGHLAND ANL i 210 =i�i�i�I�- L' __., INN ST• p 5 IV601 ST. !f VISTA - $ C/ . _ _ S P N N Litrl r Q W ENSENE AVE I__ I �I ���. . . Eip, . . L ,1 Aastatil 5 .2 i. � � r � VVII ..._ ��� __ ��I�AS'.••.`•.� � 1 / 15 � i u �© ■t deNSEY BLVD. • ' D Eno'MS .6 OC:A �'�°I A T t S P N N -II sO SBeET �II� � all 1 -- M hiL PROJECT SITE I I I SP ,.EE.A. I, ONTARIO a •CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 41` it\ Solar Photovoltaic Carport System \ � at City of Rancho Cucamonga City Hall \ y \ J P142 RESOLUTION NO. 15-160 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE SOLAR CARPORT SYSTEM INSTALLATION AT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY HALL CONTRACT NO. 15-035 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the solar carport system installation at the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Hall, Contract No. 15-035, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. RESOLUTION NO. 15-160 — Page 1 of 1 P143 STAFF REPORT kit* CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE 1-10- RANCHO Date: August 5, 2015 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John Gillison, City Manager From: Fabian Villenas, Principal Management Analyst Subject: Consideration to Approve Resolution Urging the State to Provide New Sustainable Funding For State and Local Transportation Infrastructure RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council consider approving the Resolution urging the State to provide new sustainable funding for state and local transportation infrastructure. BACKGROUND At its July 17, 2015 meeting, the League of California Cities Board of Directors adopted a Resolution to support transportation funding, specifically identifying seven priorities that are especially important for the Governor and Legislature to incorporate into any funding proposals. The Board's actions was in response to Governor Brown's Proclamation calling for an Extraordinary Session on Transportation and Infrastructure. The League is working with a broad coalition to seek support for transportation funding and is advocating for a $6 billion annual package for at least 10 years to be shared equally between the state and local governments. If it were to pass as presented, Rancho Cucamonga would equate to receive $8,185,167 in transportation funding annually for 10 years. The 2014 California Statewide Local Streets and Roads needs Assessment gave the state a score of 66 (on a scale from zero to 100) in the pavement condition index, placing it in the "at risk" category where pavements will begin to deteriorate much more rapidly and require rehabilitation or rebuilding rather than cost-effective preventative maintenance if funding is not increased. Fifty- eight percent of state roads need rehabilitation or pavement maintenance and 55% of local bridges require rehabilitation or replacement. Local governments need an additional $1.7 billion just to maintain the status quo pavement condition of 66 and an additional $3 billion annual investment to improve pavement conditions from the current "at risk" condition to "good" condition. As previously mentioned, the League Board of Directors adopted a resolution that focuses on seven points that the Governor and Legislature are encouraged to adopt. These include: 1. Make significant investment in transportation infrastructure. 2. Focus on maintaining and rehabilitating the current system. 3. Equal split between state and local projects. 4. Raise revenues across a broad range of options. 5. Invest a portion of diesel tax and/or cap & trade revenue to high-priority goods movement projects. P144 CONSIDERATION TO APPROVI.:RI.?SOI..U'PION URGING TI IE STATE'10 PROVIDE NEW SUSTAINABLE PAGE 2 FUNDING FOR STATE AND LOCAL TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE AUGUST 5,2015 • 6. Strong accountability requirements to protect the taxpayers' investment. 7. Provide consistent annual funding levels. CONCLUSION It is recommended that the City Council consider approving the Resolution urging the State to provide new sustainable funding for state and local transportation infrastructure. Should the Resolution be adopted, staff will send copies to the Governor's Office and Rancho Cucamonga's state legislative representatives. • Respectfully Submitted, Fabian Villenas Principal Management Analyst • Attachment — Resolution Fix Our Roads Fact Sheet • • • • • P145 RESOLUTION NO. 15-161 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, URGING THE STATE TO PROVIDE NEW SUSTAINABLE FUNDING FOR STATE AND LOCAL TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE WHEREAS, Governor Edmund G. Brown, Jr. has called an extraordinary session to address the immense underfunding of California's transportation infrastructure; and WHEREAS, cities and counties own and operate more than 81 percent of streets and roads in California, and from the moment we open our front door to drive to work, bike to school, or walk to the bus station, people are dependent upon a safe, reliable local transportation network; and WHEREAS, the resulting 2014 California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment, which provides critical analysis and information on the local transportation network's condition and funding needs, indicates that the condition of the local transportation network is deteriorating as predicted in the initial 2008 study; and WHEREAS, the results show that California's local streets and roads are on a path of significant decline. On a scale of zero (failed) to 100 (excellent), the statewide average pavement condition index (PCI) is 66, placing it in the "at risk" category where pavements will begin to deteriorate much more rapidly and require rehabilitation or rebuilding rather than more cost-effective preventative maintenance if funding is not increased; and • WHEREAS, if funding remains at the current levels, in 10 years, 25 percent of local streets and roads in California will be in "failed" condition; and WHEREAS, cities and counties need an additional $1.7 billion just to maintain a status quo pavement condition of 66, and much more revenue to operate the system with Best Management Practices, which would reduce the total amount of funding needed for maintenance in the future; and WHEREAS, models show that an additional $3 billion annual investment in the local streets and roads system is expected to improve pavement conditions statewide from an average "at risk" condition to an average "good" condition; and WHEREAS, if additional funding isn't secured now, it will cost taxpayers twice as much to fix the local system in the future, as failure to act this year will increase unmet funding needs for local transportation facilities by $11 billion in five years and $21 billion in ten years; and P146 WHEREAS, modernizing the local street and road system provides well-paying construction jobs and boosts local economies; and WHEREAS, the local street and road system is also critical for interconnectivity, multimodal needs, and economic growth and commerce; and WHEREAS, police, fire, and emergency medical services all need safe reliable roads to react quickly to emergency calls and a few minutes of delay can be a matter of life and death; and -. WHEREAS, maintaining and preserving the local street and road system in good condition will reduce drive times and traffic congestion, improve bicycle safety, and make the pedestrian experience safer and more appealing, which leads to reduced vehicle emissions and helping the State achieve its air quality and greenhouse gas emissions reductions goals; and WHEREAS, in addition to the local system, the state highway system needs an additional $5.7 billion annually to address the state's deferred maintenance; and WHEREAS, in order to bring the local system back into a cost-effective condition, at least $7.3 billion annually in new money going directly to cities and counties is needed; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA strongly urges the Governor and Legislature to identity a sufficient and stable funding source for local streets and roads and state highway maintenance and rehabilitation to ensure the safe and efficient mobility of the traveling public and the economic vitality of California. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA strongly urges the Governor and Legislature to adopt the following priorities for funding California's streets and roads. 1. Make a significant investment in transportation infrastructure. Any package should seek to raise at least $6 billion annually and should remain in place for at least 10 years or until an alternative method of funding our transportation system is agreed upon. 2. Focus on maintaining and rehabilitating the current system. Repairing California's streets and highways involves much more than fixing potholes. It requires major road pavement overlays, fixing unsafe bridges, providing safe access for bicyclists and pedestrians, replacing storm water culverts, as well as operational improvements that necessitate the construction of auxiliary lanes to relieve traffic congestion choke points and fixing design deficiencies that have created unsafe merging and other traffic hazards. Efforts to supply P147 funding for transit in addition to funding for roads should also focus on fixing the system first. 3. Equal split between state and local projects. We support sharing revenue for roadway maintenance equally (50/50) between the state and cities and counties, given the equally-pressing funding needs of both systems, as well as the longstanding historical precedent for collecting transportation user fees through a centralized system and sharing the revenues across the entire network through direct subventions. Ensuring that funding to local governments is provided directly, without intermediaries, will accelerate project delivery and ensure maximum accountability. 4. Raise revenues across a broad range of options. Research by the California Alliance for Jobs and Transportation California shows that voters strongly support increased funding for transportation improvements. They are much more open to a package that spreads potential tax or fee increases across a broad range of options, including fuel taxes, license fees, and registration fees, rather than just one source. Additionally, any package should move California toward an all-users pay structure, in which everyone who benefits from the system contributes to maintaining it—from traditional gasoline-fueled vehicles, to new hybrids or electric vehicles, to commercial vehicles. 5. Invest a portion of diesel tax and/or cap & trade revenue to high-priority goods movement projects. While the focus of a transportation funding package should be on maintaining and rehabilitating the existing system, California has a critical need to upgrade the goods movement infrastructure that is essential to our economic well-being. Establishing a framework to make appropriate investments in major goods movement arteries can lay the groundwork for greater investments in the future that will also improve air quality and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. 6. Strong accountability requirements to protect the taxpayers' investment. Voters and taxpayers must be assured that all transportation revenues are spent responsibly. Local governments are accustomed to employing transparent processes for selecting road maintenance projects aided by pavement management systems, as well as reporting on the expenditure of transportation funds through the State Controller's Local Streets and Roads Annual Report. 7. Provide Consistent Annual Funding Levels. Under current statute, the annual gas tax adjustment by the Board of Equalization is creating extreme fluctuations in funding levels—a $900 million drop in this budget year alone. , A transportation funding package should contain legislation that will create P148 more consistent revenue projections and allow Caltrans and transportation agencies the certainty they need for longer term planning. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 5'h day of August, 2015. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 5'h day of August, 2015. Executed this 5'h day of August, 2015 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk p P149 Problem: California lacks adequate funding to fix crumbling roads, highways, bridges and transportation non pp infrastructure. • OAD California's network of roads and highways are critical to our quality of life and economy.Yet the condition of our deteriorating network of roads is staggering: 11 Stable,Accountable Funding • Our crumbling roads cost motorists nearly$600 a year per driver for vehicle maintenance. • California has the second highest share of roads in"poor condition"in the nation. • 58% of state roads need rehabilitation or pavement maintenance. • California has 6 of 10 cities with the worst road conditions in the nation. • 55% of local bridges require rehabilitation or replacement. • Nearly 70% of California's urban roads and highways are congested. • Without additional funding, 1/4 of local streets and roads will be in failed condition by 2024. Our state lacks adequate funding to address these critical deficiencies: • Local streets and roads face an estimated shortfall of$78 billion in deferred maintenance and an annual shortfall of$7.8 billion. • CalTrans faces a $59 billion backlog in deferred maintenance and an annual shortfall in the State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP) of$5.7 billion. Solution: A responsible, accountable solution to fix our roads. A broad coalition of cities, counties,labor, business, public safety and transportation advocates has formed to meet the Governor's call to address California's chronic transportation infrastructure funding shortfall. During the 2015 special session on transportation, we support the following priorities: 1. Make a significant investment in transportation infrastructure. If we are to make a meaningful dent that demonstrates tangible benefits to taxpayers and drivers, any package should seek to raise at least $6 billion annually and should remain in place for at least 10 years or until an alternative method of funding our transportation system is agreed upon. 2. Focus on maintaining and rehabilitating the current system. Repairing California's streets and highways involves much more than fixing potholes. It requires major road pavement overlays, fixing unsafe bridges, providing safe access for bicyclists and pedestrians, replacing storm water culverts, as well as operational improvements that necessitate, among other things, the construction of auxiliary lanes to relieve traffic congestion choke points and fixing design deficiencies that have created unsafe merging and other traffic hazards. Efforts to supply funding for transit in addition to funding for roads should also focus on fixing • the system first. P150 3. Invest a portion of diesel tax and/or cap&trade revenue to high-priority goods movement projects. While the focus of a transportation funding package should be on maintaining and rehabilitating the existing system, California has a critical need to upgrade the goods movement infrastructure that is essential to our economic well-being. Establishing a framework to make appropriate investments in major goods movement arteries can lay the groundwork for greater investments in the future that will also improve air quality and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. 4. Raise revenues across a broad range of options. Research by the California Alliance for Jobs and Transportation California shows that voters strongly support increased funding for transportation improvements. They are much more open to a package that spreads potential tax or fee increases across a broad range of options rather than just one source. Additionally, any package should move California toward an all- users pay structure in which everyone who benefits from the system contributes to maintaining it-from traditional gasoline-fueled vehicles, to hybrids, alternative fuel and or electric vehicles, to commercial vehicles. Our coalition supports: • Reasonable increases in: o Gasoline and diesel excise taxes. o Vehicle registration and vehicle license fees. • Dedicating a portion of the cap and trade revenue paid by motorists at the pump to transportation projects that reduce greenhouse emissions. • Ensuring existing transportation revenues are invested in transportation-related purposes (i.e. truck weight fees and fuel taxes for off-road vehicles that are currently being diverted into the general fund). • User charge for electric and other non-fossil fuel powered vehicles that currently do not contribute to road upkeep. 5. Equal split between state and local projects. We support sharing revenue for roadway maintenance equally (5o/5o)between the state and cities and counties. Funding to local governments should be provided directly (no intermediaries) to accelerate projects and ensure maximum accountability. 6. Strong accountability requirements to protect the taxpayers' investment. Voters and taxpayers must be assured that all transportation revenues are spent responsibly. Authorizing legislation should: • Constitutionally protect transportation revenues for transportation infrastructure only. Time and again (Prop 42, 2002; Prop jA, 2006; Prop 22, 2010),voters have overwhelmingly supported dedicating and constitutionally protecting transportation dollars for those purposes. We strongly support protections that prohibit using transportation dollars for other purposes. • Repay existing transportation loans and end ongoing diversions of transportation revenues, including approximately $850 million in loans to the general fund and the annual loss of approximately $140 million in off-highway vehicle fuel taxes. P151 Strong accountability requirements to protect the taxpayers' investment (Continued). • Establish performance and accountability criteria to ensure efficient and effective use of all funding.All tax dollars should be spent properly, and recipients of new revenues should be held accountable to the taxpayers, whether at the state or local level. Counties and cities should adopt project lists at public hearings and report annually to the State Controller's Office regarding all transportation revenues and expenditures. Local governments should also commit to ensuring any new revenues supplement revenues currently invested in transportation projects. Both Caltrans and local governments can demonstrate and publicize the benefits associated with new transportation investments. • Caltrans reform and oversight. To increase Caltrans effectiveness, provide stronger oversight by the state transportation commission of the programs funded by new revenues and establish an Inspector General office to provide accountability. Reduce Caltrans administrative budgets through efficiency reviews with all savings to be spent on road improvements. • Expedite project delivery. More should be done to streamline project delivery, including but not limited to: o Establishing timelines for actions required by state agencies and eliminating other permit delays. o Increased implementation of alternative delivery systems that encourage more investment from the private sector. o. Reforms to speed project completion. 7. Provide Consistent Annual Funding Levels. Under current statute, the annual gas tax adjustment by the Board of Equalization is creating extreme fluctuations in funding levels --a $90o million drop in this budget year alone.A transportation funding package should contain legislation that will create more consistent revenue projections and allow Caltrans and transportation agencies the certainty they need for longer term planning. While this change would not provide any new revenue to transportation, it would provide greater certainty for planning and project delivery purposes. aP152 • STAFF REPORT ADFIINISTRATIVE SERVICES GROUP RANCHO CUCAMONGA Date: August 5, 2015 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager • From: Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services By: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Subject: CONSIDERATION OF PUBLIC INTEREST, CONVENIENCE, AND NECESSITY IN GRANTING A TAXICAB SERVICE PERMIT TO AMERICAN CAB, LLC RECOMMENDATION The City Council should open the public hearing and take all interested testimony to consider whether public interest, convenience, and necessity have been met in determining whether to grant a Taxicab Service Permit to American Cab. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City Council meeting will have two (2) separate public, hearings for Taxicab Service Permits. Rykal, LLC., DBA Yellow Cab and American Cab, LLC., operate as separate entities but both have Jhanetta Kheres as their Managing Member. • The City of Rancho Cucamonga's Municipal Code, Title 8, Chapter 8.30 requires that all companies that wish to provide taxicab service in the City receive a permit. As part of that permit process, the applicant must submit a completed application form. The applicant must also appear before the City Council for a public hearing to determine that the public interest, convenience, and necessity justify the issuance of the permit. Taxicab service companies and individual taxicab drivers are required to renew their respective permits on an annual basis per Municipal Code 8.30.060. The initial application fee for a new taxicab service company is $900.00; thereafter, the renewal fee is $120.00. The initial application fee for a taxicab driver is $230.00; thereafter, the renewal fee is $120.00. Currently, the City has two permitted taxicab service companies operating in the City. Those companies are Bell Cab, and Express Transportation Systems DBA Checker Cab/AA Inland Empire Cab. Bell Cab has a total of nineteen (18) taxicab drivers that are permitted in the City. Express Transportation Systems DBA Checker Cab/AA Inland Empire Cab has one (1) permitted taxicab driver. Diversified Transportation, LLC DBA Yellow Cab had sixty two (62)drivers that have continued to provide taxicab services to the community during their transition to the new ownership. Staff has reviewed the Taxicab Service Permit application submitted by American Cab(attached) and finds it to be complete. The necessary information regarding the owner of the company, the automobiles to be used, and the company's insurance policies meet the requirements of the City's Municipal Code. P153 CONSIDERATION OF PUBLIC INTEREST,CONVENIENCE,AND NECESSITY IN PAGE 2 GRANTING A TAXICAB SERVICE PERMIT TO AMERICAN CAB,LLC Aucusr 5,2015 In determining public interest, convenience, and necessity, the burden is on the applicant to show public need and necessity. According to the Municipal Code, some of the factors to be considered as the City Council receives testimony on this matter are the following: 1. Inadequacy of existing taxi services 2. The population density and socio-economic characteristics in the proposed area of operation 3. Type and frequency of transportation service needed in the proposed area of operation 4. Existing public transportation patterns, schedules, and service levels and the impact of the application upon such services 5. Traffic and parking conditions 6. The probable permanence and quality of the services offered by the applicant 7. The character of taxi service proposed by the applicant as demonstrated by: the proposed use, if any, of a radio communications system, the proposed use of terminals and private and public taxi stands, the time of day and night when service is to be offered, and the proposed . number and character of vehicles 8. The financial status, character, and responsibility of the applicant as demonstrated by: the applicant's ability to provide, maintain and operate the number of vehicles proposed to be operated in accordance with the character of service proposed in the application, the . applicant's criminal and driving record, if any, as well as credit record, and evidence of liability and worker's compensation insurance 9. The experience of the applicant in taxicab service operations as an owner, manager, or taxicab driver For the public hearing, the City Council should consider the evidence as presented on each of these factors keeping in mind the unique economics and regional nature of the taxicab business. Attached is an optional Taxicab Service Permit Requirements Matrix that is provided as a tool to assist the City Council in summarizing the information provided during the public hearing to determine if the above listed nine (9) factors have been satisfactorily addressed by the applicant. After receiving all of the testimony, the City Council may decide that the public interest, convenience, and necessity are met by the applicant and direct staff to issue a permit or the. City Council may determine that the public interest, convenience, and necessity is not met by allowing a new Taxicab Service Permit and, thus, deny the applicant. Attachments 1. American Cab Taxicab Service Permit Application 2. Summary of Current Taxicab Services in the City of Rancho Cucamonga 3. Taxicab Service Permit Requirements Matrix CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P154 -` �. 10500 Civic Center Drive • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 �r l t_l K—' Tel: (909) 919-2948 • Fax: (909) 919-2959 www.CityofRC.us RANCHO BUSINESS LICENSE APPLICATION CUCAMONGA . (Please print or type clearly, using ink) AFFIDAVIT- CONFIDENTIAL Start Date: (NOTE: Incomplete applications will not be processed. Post Office boxes or Postal Contract Stations will not be accepted for Business or Residential Addresses.ALL BUSINESSES LOCATED WITHIN CITY LIMITS MUST APPLY IN PERSON AT CITY HALL.) Business Name (DBA): 44gR1G4, e4.5 Lit • OFFICIAL USE ONLY • Business Name#2: /0 275- MAmre yitr4 At BUSINESS LICENSE NO.: 117/311110211 Of different) Business Location: -RECEIPT NO.:-- ..212 (Not P.O.Box) rr 65 City:�'LrC1.41T2. State:C % ZipF)7 .3 PAYMENT DATE: Business Phone: ( ) - Business Fax: ( ) - BATCH NO.!Iy of Rancho Cucamonga Mailing Address: 7aa41R b.12981-42i/ e War DATE ENTERED: (If different) City:We rlS'4M2 Palm-s State: Zip9ola�6 DATE REicaggikP MAY 1 4 2015 Business Email Address:SZEG-P, £ME?_tAc _ 4-is., Ne.T RECEIVED BY: � 11 Please Note: It shalt be unlawful for any packaging supplier in the City of Rancho Cucamonga to store, sett or provide tilaiittS6 Oal sia iong within the City of Rancho Cucamonga.Granting of this license does not authorize the holder to violate or cause violation of any existing Covenants,Conditions and Restrictions. Type of Business ❑Retail ❑Wholesale ❑Contractor/Developer rvice ['Professional ❑Manufacturing ❑Administrative Headquarters (Select one only) ❑Warehouse ['Delivery Vehicle With No Fixed Place of Business in the City ❑Property Rental/Commercial or Residential DEntertainment/Amusements ❑Non-Profit Organization Deshtion of Business: S AU, ALL CONTRACTORS/SUB-CONTRACTORS MUST COMPLETE BOX N) 71 lit Contractor's State License No.: Class: Project Name: State License No.: Project Location: Total Contract Amount: Seller's Permit No.: General Contractor: SUB LIST REQUIRED FEllialle. No. of Employees: PERSONAL INFORMATION: Enter below names of Owners, Partners or Corporate Officers. Use Additional Sheets as necessary. Ownership: ❑Corporation [gild Liability Corp ❑Sole Proprietor 0 General Partnership ❑Trust ❑ltd Liability Partnership Owner Name: t21,be , eR S Title: (41s GY-Ad.i.-I4 P-Phone Home Address: Social Security N Cit Stat C. 's License N Owner Name: 4 C W Title: •0. 0. Phone: ( ) - Home Address: Social Security No.: City: State: Zip: Driver's License No.: BUSINESS OWNER DECLARATION (MUST BE COMPLETED) • OFFICIAL USE ONLY • Acceptance of payment does not constitute approval of Business License. Planning Department Approval: ❑Approved ❑Denied Authorization to conduct business is not granted until license is issued. I Signature: Date: declare,under penalty of perjury that this application is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I understand and agree that the Conditions: granting of this Business License requires my compliance with all appli- Reasons: cable City of Ra -,Cucamonga . al Code provisions,state, local, federal laws,a d al .o ditions s•t rtry above Fire Safety Approval: •- i Enter the amount from Box 8 on reverse of this form $ g Date: Si na[u II Business Owner or'_ Penalty:y: 50%Of applicable) $ . SB 1186 State Fee Name(type or, y: - _ _ __ _ $ 1.00 PROPERTY OWNER DECLARATION (MUST BE COMPLETED) TOTAL AMOUNT DUE �5��' wr Under federal and state law,compliance with disability access laws is a serious and significant I declare that, ❑I am the owner, ❑I legally represent the owner,of responsibility that applies to all California building owners and tenants with buildings open to real property involved in this application and do hereby consent to the the public.You may obtain information about your legal obligations,and how to comply with filing of this Business License application. disability access laws at the following agencies:The Division of the State Architect at www. dgs.ca.gov/dsa/Home.aspx,The Department of Rehabilitation at www.rehab.cahwnet.gou, The California Commission on Disability Access at www.ccda.ca.gov. Signature: Date: (Property Owner or Legal Representative) _ Please make check payable to: City of Rancho Cucamonga Name(type or print): Total Amount Received: $ REFUND/BILLED:$ P155 Business Name •& 1 5 J 0,4-43 Lit al Yd 1011) e Business Address 1027S— Mggs f& v46-p. e o M i1 C4 cf 17(c& Street City State Zip Business Telephond (Ei) 300 - c009 v Owners Name ' K)C FR Home Addres ree y a e ip Home Telephon Number of Vehicles to be operated under this permit: _IOC__ Prepare attached sheet (Vehicle Information Sheet) listing all vehicles including license number, make, model, year, color, type, passenger capacity, condition and any company vehicle identification number. Also, attach a copy of title or vehicle registration for each vehicle. Address apd Method of Storage of Vehicle l� )S �t3tiTG Vl� MDRIT, A,►i✓ CA �)� 3 List any and all prior experience in the taxicab business: L,4 140 U- - Ack ve -24, 1 C443 J_l C Has your permit, license or certificate been denied, revoked or suspended by any public agency for taxicab service or taxicab driving permit? L_ YES NO If yes, explain in detail Have you or any person having an ownership interest in the proposed taxicab service, had any felony convictions within the previous five (5) years? 2— YES NO If yes, explain in detail 3 P156 Vehicle Information Sheet Vehicle # /60/ 5a.}.g (24"2,44/.) 0il Make Model Year Passenger Capacity t26.0 tdikr Ode ti Color Scheme of Vehicle Insignia or other distinguishable characteristics of taxicab Does the vehicle have an illuminated sign? . YES NO If yes, describe 777, Lic' List any legends on top of vehicle License plate number)77 5.301 • • Vehicle # 728,1,4E- 4,,L)x240 9i`f Make Model Year Passenger Capacity Color Scheme of Vehicle Insignia or other distinguishable characteristics of taxicab Does the vehicle have an illuminated sign? YES NO If yes, describe List any legends on top of vehicle T ' Li 61-1-7— Ais ,gnit4iff • License plate number 6'66 (UJ Vehicle #/0 ou7,.6- c 4i 401 Make Model Year Passenger Capacity -/?e75 /v1)7iX- ire . c-I-1.. 6-3 Color Scheme of Vehicle Insignia or other distinguishable characteristics of taxicab Does the vehicle have an illuminated sign? Z YES NO If yes, describe 4 • • P157 List any legends on top of vehicle T/O / L// 'n/ /y-1 e)Zj�-i r License plate number J-gG(743U7 • Vehicle # /o V fR.Cricc '9-/ZQr/4,t) A / Make Model Year Passenger Capacity or -7;Eo 11/4/ire /rJt Color Scheme of Vehicle Insignia or other distinguishable characteristics of taxicab Does the vehicle have an illuminated sign? C- YES NO If yes, describe List any legends on top of vehicle i a/ (i(fy " AMC-0(644i • License plate number go a tiU/ This application must be signed below by the individual applicant or partner or an officer if the applicant is a partnership or corporation. • The undersigned as/Ai—M/3 f n/4CfE12— of AA��+/ J L( • hereby declares under penalty of perjury, that the information contained in this application for a permit is true an orrect. 1 10 Signature t u Date M d/C 5 P158 Vehicle Information Sheet Vehicle # /fro" 2.179/z7e c4e4vatii J ©i ti S� Make Model Year Passenger Capacity zaf/i lc E( e i1CgAf S & Color Scheme of Vehicle Insignia or other distinguishable characteristics of taxicab Does the vehicle have an illuminated sign? YES NO If yes, describe List any legends on top of vehicle ?ep t) rJC. License plate number DZ) g' 01 Vehicle # �GE/ Malj99(`J//T t&tiV ,4 p 9� Passenger Capacity Model y ffr: —/rt� i r� — R jug- � rr„— �� Color Scheme of Vehicle Insignia or other dish i liable characteristics of taxicab Does the vehicle have an illuminated sign? YES NO If yes, describe List any legends on top of vehicle 7-6 P Li Q-k,J,; /7 672_" License plate number 7(Q W 7k 1 Vehicle # Make Model Year Passenger Capacity Color Scheme of Vehicle Insignia or other distinguishable characteristics of taxicab Does the vehicle have an illuminated sign? YES NO If yes, describe 4 P159 List any legends on top of vehicle License plate number Vehicle # Make Model Year Passenger Capacity Color Scheme of Vehicle Insignia or other distinguishable characteristics of taxicab Does the vehicle have an illuminated sign? YES NO If yes, describe List any legends on top of vehicle License plate number This application must be signed below by the individual applicant or partner or an officer if the applicant is a partnership or corporation. The undersigned as of hereby declares under penalty of perjury, that the information contained in this application for a permit is tr e and correct. r , „ Signature A i Date /W q e J 5 P160: twits. . tolie44 s� —____ __ ______ d.�s S9 . Hey .y4 kils .A10 Abho OW y .5'4411 494 4 �`, c \ o o - — w ~ o co o 4o5 ca J y =© a `-- a u z V Y "� W n v g H F- N q �_.M.a -c- W.m - a._-.. _ C _ C Q n a- W a J ¢ r N H a Q S O O f 2 g "`2223 _F. O i i (may a� O ^ O S O in in E YC h r O V C � cc , a a P. O W e e $py .—. N _Z g N S e 2 S O A. a� Q W S' , > Q 0 = s F V p N N• ��,' , .. co il UJ ci 8 O O > W Um _y J N a n O SI J T >,V W 0 b >i f S ° �'L Q) 2 E & 1 H a 3 0 L a 0_ z F N f m y N N up z 0 ) +�e. Q s s � ccn a F- N ' 2 O ✓Fa 01 Q (n V •1 m C O Z a ; a• 2 Q R W LID 31 Q C �/O W J r U -I Q O s c� ° y a • D /ate (n'`J V ez W m D g N pUF, a CL CO =Li.W M Z 8 W N W m = N C H ' 0, b. 0I P161 California INSURANCE IDENTIFICATION CARD (STATE) COMPANY NUMBER COMPANY x COMMERCIAL PERSONAL Scottsdale Insurance Co POLICY NUMBER EFFECTIVE DATE EXPIRATION GATE CAS0100197 10/01/14 10/01115 YEAR MAKE/MODEL VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 2014 00D01503A1123115 2C7WDGBG0ER427034 AGENCY/COMPANY ISSUING CARD ISU Ins Svcs of Irvine LLC 18022 Cowan,Suite 225 Irvine,CA 92614 15D3 949-419-2100 INSURED -American Cab Co. LLC 760-423-5272 72048 Woburn Court L Thousand Palms,CA 92276 SEE IMPORTANT NOTICE ON REVERSE SIDE 111•C+m-' / • California INSURANCE IDENTIFICATION CARD (STATE) COMPANY NUMBER COMPANY X COMMERCIAL PERSONAL Scottsdale Insurance Co POLICY NUMBER EFFECTIVE DATE EXPIRATION DATE CAS0100197 10/01/14 10/01/15 / - YEAR MAKE/MODEL VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER rr 2014 D0001504 A1/23/15 2C7WDGBG2ER427035 AGENCY/COMPANY ISSUING CARD ISU Ins Svcs of Irvine LLC 18022 Cowan,Suite 225 Irvine,CA 92614 949-419-2100 INSURED r American Cab Co. LLC 760-423-5272 72048 Woburn Court L Thousand Palms, CA 92276 SEE IMPORTANT NOTICE ON REVERSE SIDE • E . - , P162 \ Q a `iri C *� | !�| / § ir $ § §§f |( | ' § || , o B % )|§ !! LI| §.§|!| @ § § §�, |! §| ||,,|. — k /kt■ f| // - § - = Z k - r-Ls 0 } § ; cc § E pei § §n. LI � § B I E co § " f -s ; ) ■ , . —I co m ) § . ( �$ § � «c»: = Lii / 5 /. s- - k * i ` ) eq \ § Br m , [ [ . \ § 2 § m -> = a« � =§ = k ~ o 2 LW E & = # ( | § § 0 ) e _ � Lu s k � ® � g N. - CCz z — � � ' & ° � § \ � \ / k & ■ cu § ° \ ) E5kkd , ; etaJ = } 0-et & mE 6 = Eco = _i z C,, § § § e § k ) \ P163 California INSURANCE IDENTIFICATION CARD (STATE) COMPANY NUMBER COMPANY x COMMERCIAL PERSONAL Scottsdale Insurance Co POLICY NUMBER EFFECTIVE DATE EXPIRATION DATE /31 $ CAS0100197 10101114 10101115 /31 # YEAR MAKE/MODEL VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 2014 D0001505A1123115 • 2C7WDGBG8ER427038 AGENCY/COMPANY ISSUING CARD ISU Ins Svcs of Irvine LLC • 18022 Cowan,Suite 225 Irvine,CA 92614 949-419-2100 INSURED r American Cab Co. LLC • 760-423-5272 72048 Woburn Court Thousand Palms, CA 92276 SEE IMPORTANT NOTICE ON REVERSE SIDE P164 • THIS VALIDATED REGISTRATION CARD OR A FACSIMILE COPY IS TO BE KEPT WITH THE /EHICLE FOR WHICH IT IS ISSUED. THIS REQUIREMENT DOES NOT APPLY WHEN THE VEHICLE IS LEFT UNATTENDED. IT NEED NOT BE DISPLAYED. PRESENT IT TO ANY PEACE 3FFICER UPON DEMAND. IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE A RENEWAL NOTICE, USE THIS FORii TO PAY YOUR RENEWAL FEES OR NOTIFY THE DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES OF THE PLANNED NON-OPERATIONAL STATUS (PNO) OF A STORED VEHICLE . RENEWAL FEES MUST BE PAID ON OR BEFORE THE REGISTRATION EXPIRATION DATE OR PENALTIES WILL BE DUE PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE SECTIONS 9552 - 9554 . EVIDENCE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE FROM YOUR INSURANCE COMPANY MUST BE PROVIDED TO THE DEPARTMENT WITH THE PAYMENT OF RENEWAL FEES . EVIDENCE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE IS NOT REQUIRED WITH REGISTRATION RENEWAL OF OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLES, TRAILERS, VESSELS, OR IF YOU FILE A PNO ON THE VEHICLE . WHEN WRITING TO DMV, ALWAYS GIVE YOUR FULL NAME, PRESENT ADDRESS, AND THE VEHICLE MAKE, LICENSE, AND IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS . ************** DO NOT DETACH - REGISTERED OWNER INFORMATION ********wn xxx it IllIllIflhlIllOhl 11111111 111111 I 11111 11111 II REGISTRATION CARD VALID FROM: 10/29/2014 TO: 10/31/2015 :CAKE YR RODE'_ YR 1ST SOLD VLF CLASS "YR TYPE PER TER: LIC LICENSE R ?ER TOYT 2006 0000 AH 2014 31X 31 76349K1 BODY TYPE MODEL DIP ?D AY. UNLADE:!/G/CGS `EHICLE ID NUMBER TX Q VX 2 D 04140 5TDZA23C46S390578 TEP E VEHICLE USE DATE ISSUED CC/A_CO DI FEE RECVC PIC USE TAX STICKER ISSUED COMMERCIAL 10/30/14 33 10/30/14 5 88 56059052 PR/HIST: SALVAGED REGISTERED CRUER :COG:] PAIL AMERICAN CAB LLC $ 309 . 00 72048 WOBURN CT ._OURI DUE AMPERE RECVO $ 309 . 00 CASH : CHCK : 309 . 00 THOUSAND PLMS CRDT : CA 92276 • LI°_2:HOLDER C10 V74 D7 0030900 0003 CS C10 103014 31 76349K1 578 P165 • INSURANCE IDENTIFICATION CARD California (STATE) X • L COMMERCIAL PERSONAL COMPANY NUMBER Scottsdale Insurance Co POLICY NUMBER EFFECTIVE DATE EXPIRATION DATE CAS0100197 10/01/14 10/01/15 YEAR MAKE/MODEL VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 2006 TOY01485 A3/19/15 Svcs 5TDZA23C46S390578 ISU Ins Svcs 1 �y AGENCY/COMPANY ISSUING CARD of Irvine LLC 18022 Cowan,Suite 225 Irvine,CA 92614 949419-2100 INSURED r American Cab Co. LLC • 760423-5272 72048 Woburn Court u Thousand Palms,CA 92276 SEE IMPORTANT NOTICE ON REVERSE SIDE • • • f ., !y u O- o d P166 SOY �� • a.� � u �, ` N2 0 � W G � d r o r J tr. ( w o,,y to 2zr0' e--1.30 JG.Lc) ` S rr a'sOd) t02w..9et _ -7 _- U ct v N W O 2 O t�E Q•' 2 ¢8 2 4i r W rat CC t ¢ �y66a y62 3 S CC as Y t - gv test C y,l,- u N N Fn 2 F- w `� Fn tV�'�uo — O• u yy Oy(lg E W = R R o = N O a O pp = H LLI = - 4 h 2 61 a = = a 15 J ¢ a N w wa E. c- 4 = C a —d O rD � O Q g 2 o.. , 4 W yyL M Q = o O C C rsi - Q U C m 1=O 3 s y d 3 a W o W w o a ^ 2S °O ° N 1 ti M_ ey 44 Q C o \ {, 7 ¢ ,z F py ee 2 r N W S O II ! E sb ON1 a • V W O H G I- u J G 5 Q a IC ' S a 2¢ g 2 O 2 m w 0 "p F pp[[ ¢ m S 4¢ (.o a N. C q ¢ N O N 2 N E W r 1Iq 0 = a LT- V) Q S p 6 Zr- s - _ v 5 > in w a ¢ - - U y O w 2 Q O G ¢ Oy 0 W O a C CJ Ca U V V 0 2 P W U m d S 0 J W o f M ^ W g E 3 y O gel U-u, Q W sp��'y, — a c� ' 2 ti W N 2 a W o, 2 saw 1- w3r-- P167 California INSURANCE IDENTIFICATION CARD (STATE) COMPANY NUMBER COMPANY X COMMERCIAL PERSONAL Scottsdale Insurance Co POLICY NUMBER EFFECTIVE DATE EXPIRATION DATE CAS0100197 10/01/14 10/01/15 YEAR MAKE/MODEL VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER /J_ 2014 DODG1502 A1/23/15 2C7WD0BG4ER427036 6it AGENCY/COMPANY ISSUING CARD ISU Ins Svcs of Irvine LLC 18022 Cowan,Suite 225 Irvine,CA 92614 949419.2100 INSURED r American Cab Co. LLC 760-423-5272 72048 Woburn Court L Thousand Palms,CA 92276 SEE IMPORTANT NOTICE ON REVERSE SIDE California INSURANCE IDENTIFICATION CARD (STATE) COMPANY NUMBER COMPANY ttsdale Insurance Co COMMERCIAL u I PERSONAL XIS/ POLICY NUMBER EFFECTIVE DATE EXPIRATION DATE CAS0100197 10/01/14 10/01/15 YEAR MAI(EIMOOEL VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 2014 DODG1501 A1/23/15 2C7WDGBG9ER427033 AGENCY/COMPANY ISSUING CARD ISU Ins Svcs of Irvine LLC 18022 Cowan,Suite 225 Irvine,CA 92614 949-419-2100 -, INSURE D r American Cab Co. LLC 760-423-5272 72048 Woburn Court L Thousand Palms,CA 92276 SEE IMPORTANT NOTICE ON REVERSE SIDE • t -----1, AMERII7 OP ID:WY 68 AFRO CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE 10/02/ODIYYYY 10/ou2B1a I THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER,AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT; If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(es) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED,subject to the terms and conditions of the policy,certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder In lieu of such endorsement(s). . PRODUCER Phone:949419-2100 CONTACT 1St/Ins Svcs of Irvine LLC NAME: Win Youngblood 18022 Cowan,Suite 225 Fax:949-955.1478 (ac°.uu,EXD:949419-2135 (NC NO):949-955-1478 Irvine ca 92614 ADDRESS,wyoungblood @Isuirvine-com Mike Scanlon INSURER(S)AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC INSURER A:Scottsdale Insurance Co 41297 INSURED American Cab Co. LLC INSURERS 2145 E.Tahquitr CynWay,PMB4351 'INSURER Palm Springs,CA 92262 INSURER 0: ' INSURER E: i INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN. THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POUCIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. . INSR -- ADOL SUOR LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE INSRI WVD POLICY NUMBER POUCYEFF POLICY EXP(MMfDD/Yy'YY)I(MMIOOrYWyt LIMITS GENERAL LIABNTY EACH OCCURRENCE $ — OAET _S I COMMERCIAL GENERAL LABILITY PREMISES(En 3 ___ CLAIMS-MADE I___I OCCUR MED EXP(Any me Perseni E __-.....__... PERSONAL B ACV INJURY 3 GENERAL AGGREGATE 3 I GENE AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG I3 7 POLICY nii W8—r P1 LOC I s AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY OMBINEEDI BINDLE UMri I3 1,000,000 A ! ANY AUTO X CAS0100197 10/01/2014 10/01/2015 BODILY INJURY(Per perm) I3 ALL OWNED ---'SCHEDULED • AUTOS X AUTOS BODILY INJURY■Per acciaenq $ 'NON-0YJNED PROPERTY DAMAGE' HIRED AUTOS AUTOS (Per=Mont) 33 UM DRELLALIA — OCCUR EACH EXCESS LIAR CLAMS-MADE AGGREGATE OCCURRENCE 3 GREGATE 5 DED RETENTION S 3 WORKERS COMPENSATION I I OC STA RS I I ER AND EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY TYIN ANY PROPRIETORJPARTNERIEXECIJT<VE EL ES EACH ACCIDENT $ OFFICER/MEUURERC(CLUDED9 NIA (Mandatory In NH) EL DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE b If yea.describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS CORNY I EL DISEASE-POLICYIA1IT IS DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS/VEHICLES (Attach ACORD 101,Additional Remarks Scheadia.N more space is rsquInd) CERTIFICATE HOLDER IS NAMED ADDITIONAL INSURED UNDER THE AUTO LIABILITY AS RESPECTS OPERATIONS OF THE NAMED INSURED. CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. BUSINESS LICENSE DEPT ATTN: MINERVA GAMBOA AOR�°REPR °IT^nom 10500 CIVIC CENTER DR l(��l • [} (\ S _ Q _ !RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 Y y, (kiY,q.L�( CAJYfi`!� CD 1988-2010 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25(2010/05) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD • • P169 Gamboa, Minerva From: Yancy, Michelle Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 11:21 AM To: Gamboa, Minerva Subject: DOJ • The following Taxi applicants passed DOJ nassaseess • Jhanetta Kheres .Machette 4/ww City of Rancho Cucamonga Human Resources Technician 909-477-2700 ext 2412 909-477-2734 Fax michelle.yancy(Thcitvofrc.us r \\y i t I " •4, ` I ° ,:raw Your Numbers" Wellness Pr©gram 1 PI /0 v 0 0 0 m • 00 c O 0 a U Q) v 0 v 0 0. v Z L W u O 0- z X cn • •— c L O a-■ E co a, 2 o la Y N Ili N m }I LL ^WC t to E CJ N C a > O mo O O ` N To = 0 a C c a) CO H C ._- 3 L 3 L. o v C t, v E m a C o E E . o O a) n > c C a) O - 3 U o m S t 2 v ..0 o .0 c c c v _ o '^ 0. a) E E -o O CO U u m 41 O C u V o O a) - c c C c .n Z o w "O 'n n (p ro U a) C ' CC C u y > in C 0 a -E — 7 O I in N a CO C c o m c y o `o a .� t o`co to u E 'a a) v m o x a y E f0 v v o co 02 L n ` v N > a u « y ay c y c a °m IZU C N O Cu N G) a c u t >' - 'O C "O U o0 0 oa r o u in n = a C _ O a, .O o .> c d C a u u v > N r E a m a s '� v `- o N v D E U " > o a) c o a " v V a m v °c UI LOU >-0 a o `° a >' v a v co i y '> U o = O E > o v a o v N c cu co 'a t . a s o- c v u o m a C o c O o a _ o o m o)Laa Z a C C C c C � N ro O " OD -0 C 0 0 O T V > co al U U a 0 m 'C U U v ms m > a m m u c >- .- C x °X a o a a o c a E 2CL CO C v v a _ C 0 v CO �O 0 ° c c ° °° E a v u c c U -p a a co 0 CD C a o _ N u v U 0 _ co O o C U O a N Y O a) > '^ "6 O v N u ++ U Q = v .° n in -c v w _ c LL N a O 0 -O U O o C 0 .0 ` y 0 as N v 0 O_ O N a O m 0 C a o 'c0 v m n Y C s N G m n E 0 o CO a C E `-' a co u to c a m m ,c o E m '`0 3 a m v C C C v F-- `m H `o w s.. - H a H a n v u H v u m m H E ro P171 Summary of Current Taxicab Services in the City of Rancho Cucamonga • • The Business License Division of the Finance Department facilitates the issuance of taxicab service permits and taxicab drivers permits. Currently, the City has two permitted taxicab service companies operating in the City. Those companies are Bell Cab and Express Transportation Systems DBA Checker Cab/AA Inland Empire Cab. Bell Cab • • Began providing services on September 3, 1998 • Currently have a total of eighteen (18) taxicab drivers that are permitted in the City • Their rates are as follows: $2.50 — pick up fee (includes first 1/10 mile) $0.25 —each additional 1/10 mile • $2.50 — per mile thereafter $26.00 — per hour waiting time and/or traffic delay Express Transportation Systems DBA Checker Cab/AA Inland Empire Cab • Approved by City Council on August 6, 2014 • Currently have one (1) driver in the city . • Their rates are as follows: • $2.50 — pick up fee (includes first 1/10 mile) • $0.25 —each additional 1/10 mile $2.50 — per mile thereafter $26.00 — per hour waiting time and/or traffic delay Diversified Transportation, LLC DBA Yellow Cab • Began providing services on August 1, 2001 and CLOSED February 16, 2015 • Currently have a total of sixty two (62) taxicab drivers that are permitted in the city • Their rates are as follows: $2.50 — pick up fee (includes first 1/10 mile) $0.25 —each additional 1/10 mile $2.50 — per mile thereafter $26.00 — per hour waiting time and/or traffic delay • P172 A Mai Cet OA, Le} Meter Rates Rancho Cucamonga $2.50 Flag Drop (First 1 /10th Mile) Each Additional 1 /10th of a mile 0.25 Each 34 Seconds Traffic Delay 0.25 Waiting Time $26.00 Per Hour T One to Five Passengers - Same Fare P173 STAFF REPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES GROUP L J RANCHO CUCAMONGA Date: August 5, 2015 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services By: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Subject: CONSIDERATION OF PUBLIC INTEREST, CONVENIENCE, AND NECESSITY IN GRANTING A TAXICAB SERVICE PERMIT TO RYKAL, LLC DBA YELLOW CAB • RECOMMENDATION The City Council should open the public hearing and take all interested testimony to consider whether public interest, convenience, and necessity have been met in determining whether to grant a Taxicab Service Permit to Rykal, LLC DBA Yellow Cab. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City Council meeting will have two (2) separate public hearings for Taxicab Service Permits. Rykal, LLC DBA Yellow Cab and American Cab, LLC., operate as separate entities but both have Jhanetta Kheres as their Managing Member. The City of Rancho Cucamonga's Municipal Code, Title 8, Chapter 8.30 requires that all companies that wish to provide taxicab service in the City receive a permit. As part of that permit process, the applicant must submit a completed application form. The applicant must also appear before the City Council for a public hearing to determine that the public interest, convenience, and necessity justify the issuance of the permit. Taxicab service companies and individual taxicab drivers are required to renew their respective permits on an annual basis per Municipal Code 8.30.060. The initial application fee for a new taxicab service company is $900.00; thereafter, the renewal fee is $120.00. The initial application fee for a taxicab driver is $230.00; thereafter, the renewal fee is $120.00 Yellow Cab's prior ownership as Diversified Transportation, LLC DBA Yellow Cab was one of the first taxicab providers in Rancho Cucamonga and was, until its change in ownership as one of three approved taxicab providers in the city. However, its transition to a new ownership as Rykal LLC, DBA Yellow Cab, requires that it submit a new taxicab service application. Prior to the change of ownership, Diversified Transportation, LLC DBA Yellow Cab had sixty two (62) drivers that have continued to provide taxicab services to the community during this transition period. Currently, the City has two permitted taxicab service companies operating in the City. Those companies are Bell Cab, and Express Transportation Systems DBA Checker Cab/AA Inland Empire Cab. Bell Cab has a total of eighteen (18) taxicab drivers that are permitted in the City. Express Transportation Systems DBA Checker Cab/AA Inland Empire Cab has one (1) permitted taxicab P174 CONSIDERATION OF PUBLIC INTEREST,CONVENIENCE,AND NECESSITY IN PAGE 2 GRANTING A TAXICAB SERVICE PERMIT TO RYKAL,LLC DBA YELLOW CAB AUGUST 5,2015 driver. Diversified Transportation, LLC DBA Yellow Cab had sixty two (62) drivers that have continued to provide taxicab services to the community during their transition to the new ownership. Staff has reviewed the Taxicab Service Permit application submitted by Rykal, LLC DBA Yellow Cab (attached) and finds it to be complete. The necessary information regarding the owner of the company, the automobiles to be used, and the company's insurance policies meet the requirements of the City's Municipal Code. In determining public interest, convenience, and necessity, the burden is on the applicant to show public need and necessity. According to the Municipal Code, some of the factors to be considered as the City Council receives testimony on this matter are the following: 1. Inadequacy of existing taxi services 2. The population density and socio-economic characteristics in the proposed area of operation 3. Type and frequency of transportation service needed in the proposed area of operation • 4. Existing public transportation patterns, schedules, and service levels and the impact of the application upon such services 5. Traffic and parking conditions 6. The probable permanence and quality of the services offered by the applicant 7. The character of taxi service proposed by the applicant as demonstrated by: the proposed use, if any, of a radio communications system, the proposed use of terminals and private and public taxi stands, the time of day and night when service is to be offered, and the proposed number and character of vehicles 8. The financial status, character, and responsibility of the applicant as demonstrated by: the applicant's ability to provide, maintain and operate the number of vehicles proposed to be • operated in accordance with the character of service proposed in the application, the applicant's criminal and driving record, if any, as well as credit record, and evidence of liability and worker's compensation insurance 9. The experience of the applicant in taxicab service operations as an owner, manager, or taxicab driver For the public hearing, the City Council should consider the evidence as presented on each of these factors keeping in mind the unique economics and regional nature of the taxicab business. Attached is an optional Taxicab Service Permit Requirements Matrix that is provided as a tool to assist the City Council in summarizing the information provided during the public hearing to determine if the above listed nine (9) factors have been satisfactorily addressed by the applicant. After receiving all of the testimony, the City Council may decide that the public interest, convenience, and necessity are met by the applicant and direct staff to issue a permit or the City Council may determine that the public interest, convenience, and necessity is not met by allowing a new Taxicab Service Permit and, thus, deny the applicant. P175 CONSIDERATION OF PUBLIC INTEREST,CONVENIENCE,AND NECESSITY IN PAc;i 3 GRANTING A TAXICAB SERVICE PERMIT TO RYKAL,LLC DBA YELLOW CAB AUGUST 5,2015 Attachments 1. Yellow Cab Taxicab Service Permit Application 2. Summary of Current Taxicab Services in the City of Rancho Cucamonga 3. Taxicab Service Permit Requirements Matrix CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Drive • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 P176 v _-Y T Tel: 919-2948 • Fax: (909) 919.2959 Y A www.CityofRC.us LA t L-• �� BUSINESS LICENSE APPLICATION RANCHO . (Please print or type clearly, using ink) li C-(� � ( 11 g AFFIDAVIT- CONFIDENTIAL Start Date: (NOTE: Incomplete applications will not be processed.Post Office boxes or Postal Contract Stations will not be accepted for Business a or Residential Addresses.ALL BUSINESSES LOCATED WITHIN CITY LIMITS MUST APPLY IN PERSON AT CITY HALL.) /_•,agl Business Na me (DBA i`C ): � i 4. 0- ! (-la • - fir - • OFFICIAL UiE UN:i • . ` Business Name#2: / 0' BUSINESS LICENSE NO.: / ' (If different) /oa75 41lm c9c 'Atha ,4 - /1.4'1!110 Business Location: /�qq RECEIPT NO.: � (Not P.O.Box) [;T Zj 5i7I3 PAYMENT DATE: - City�Bit/�G//1�� State: p Business Phone: ((709)300 —0E4,0 Business Fax: ( ) - BATCH dty of Rancho Cucamonga Mailing Address: 7 OqS w4igcieg gGifz/' q DATE ENTERED: of different) City: 7ZJc US"VO 7447 State:- Zip70.$ DATE R ' ��T �R��iYt� MAY 2 8 2015 Business Email Address: �'i4�R/0ehti-C-4F. Ai r RECEIVED BY: ,n Please Note:It shall be unlawful for any packaging supplier in the City of Rancho Cucamonga to store,sell or provid,�t¢(p�Eo Lf 7 �311gale Og within the City of Rancho Cucamonga.Granting of this license does not authorize the holder to violate or cause violation o(R�fh•N YYovena'o's,Conditions and Restrictions. Type of Business ['Retail ['Wholesale ❑Contractor/Developer Dice ❑Professional ['Manufacturing ['Administrative Headquarters (Select one only) ❑Warehouse ❑Delivery Vehicle With No Fixed Place of Business in the City ['Property Rental/Commercial or Residential ❑Enteritainment/Amusements ❑Non-Profit Organization Description of Business: /� ALL CONTRACTORS/SUB-CONTRACTORS MUST COMPLETE BOX "7-4-4 c415 l '11,B<� ;`// Contractor's State License No.: Class: Project Name: - Project Location: State License No.: - Total Contract Amount: Seller's Permit No.: General Contractor: SUB LIST REQUIRED FEIN: No. of Employees: PERSONAL INFORMATION: Enter below names of Owners, Partners or Corporate Officers. Use Additional Sheets as necessary. Ownership: ❑Corporation aftfaLiability Corp ❑Sole Proprietor ['General Partnership ❑Trust ❑Ltd Liability Partnership Owner Name: JAPIA./ /TA K416,--6.5 Title:/HEAf iP-J23)i49hone: Home Address: Social Security No. City: State er's License No Owner Name: Title: Phone: ( ) - Home Address: Social Security No.: City: State: Zip: Driver's License No.: BUSINESS OWNER DECLARATION (MUST BE COMPLETED) • OFFICIAL USE ONLY • • Acceptance of payment does not constitute approval of Business License. Planning Department Approval: ❑Approved ❑Denied: .• Authorization to conduct business is not granted until license is issued. I Signature: Date: declare, under penalty of perjury that this application is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I understand and agree that the Conditions: granting of this Business License r•. es my compliance with all appli- Reasons: cable City of•.ncho Cucamon•. aunic sal Code provisions,state,local, federal la: , . ) ..I onditim s s•t forth abo; Fire-Safety Approval:- - - - - . -- _. -- ----.-- / Enter the amount from Box 8 on reverse of this form ©����If4'I 9 Signatu -� ( Date: Penalty: 50% (if applicable)(Business Owner or Agent) Y� C PP� ) $ Name([ +• or print): SB 1186 State Fee I $ 1.00 I ' PROPERTY OWNER DECLARATION (MUST BE COMPLETED) TOTAL AMOUNT DUE I $ all Under federal and state law,conipliande with disability access Iasrs is a s 'as$g -. I declare that, ❑I am the owner, ❑I legally represent the owner,of responsibility that applies to all'California building owners and tenants with buildings open to real property involved in this application and do hereby consent to the the public.You may obtain information about your legal obligations,and how to comply with filing of this Business License application. disability access laws at the following agencies:The Division of the State Architect at www. dgs.ca.gov/dsa/Home.aspx,The Department of Rehabilitation at www.rehab.cahwnet:gov The California Commission on DisabiUty Access at www.ccda.ca.gov. _. Signature: Date: : - . - - _ (Property Owner or Legal Representative) _ Please make check payable to: City of Rancho Cucamonga Name(type or print): Total Amount Received:$ REFUND/BILLED:$ P177 Business Name Ryk4-L LLC caar Business Address %l/ 7� /�F� � V)> 4/a la,112 c 9/7/3 Street City State / Zip Business Telephon‘.1?(7) 3ciO -C606 Owners Name ,J%4,,dg4 /k/ccES • Home Address Street City State r Zip Home Telephon Number of Vehicles to be operated under this permit: /40 Prepare attached sheet (Vehicle Information Sheet) listing all vehicles including license number, make, model, year, color, type, passenger capacity, condition and any company vehicle identification number. Also, attach a copy of title or vehicle registration for each vehicle. Address an4 Method of Storage f Vehicle //.T7r 4/9rvt 1450 a4 /f/1 ton.N6A-r2 Gtt C7/ / Litany and all prior pxperience in thel.axicab business: /0 1k#,Q, 7.4 7:14C/ E4 j 4, a' ,F9 [V/3 i Has your permit, license or certificate been denied, revoked or suspended by any public agency for taxicab service or taxicab driving permit? v YES NO If yes, explain in detail Have you or any person having an ownership interest in the proposed taxicab service, had any felony convictions within the previous five (5) years? YES NO If yes, explain in detail 3 . P178 Vehicle Information Sheet Vehicle # /.airy / 0200T. d- Made Model Year rt^ Passenger Capacity �U Yom//off lYa-//�v O -,ei ro,ug Ab Color Scheme of Vehicle Insignia or other distinguishable characteristics of taxicab Does the vehicle have an illuminated sign? YES NO If yes, describe List any legends on top of vehicle "1/4,c/e" License plate number ? Q 366 19/411 Vehicle # /Cyan 11/Ali OW —Zee g t �B6 Make Model Year Passenger Capacity Y��/oel "$*/am/4g 4istp/7-b s $ Color Scheme of Vehicle Insignia or other distinguishable characteristics of taxicab Does the vehicle have an illuminated sign? YES NO If yes, describe List any legends on top of vehicle A6A/'C • License plate number /( .5‘,.-rbp / Vehicle # / Q ' itat/NSIJ cad� Make Model :ri Passenger Capacity Q vr._ C — 77 ") Color Scheme of Vehicle - d u r/ Insig i_ or other distinguishable characteristics of taxicab Does the vehicle have an illuminated sign? YES NO If yes, describe 4 P179 Vehicle Information Sheet Vehicle # 903 Make Mode Year Passenger Capacity *10 al cs/�dv nob' Color Scheme of Vehicle � i r LA, Insignia or other distinguishable characteristics of taxicab Does the vehicle have an illuminated sign? v YES NO If yes, describe / List any legends on top of vehicle Nag- License plate number 99¢,47/1/1. Vehicle # Make Model Year Passenger Capacity Color Scheme of Vehicle Insignia or other distinguishable characteristics of taxicab Does the vehicle have an illuminated sign? YES NO If yes, describe List any legends on top of vehicle License plate number Vehicle # Make Model Year Passenger Capacity Color Scheme of Vehicle Insignia or other distinguishable characteristics of taxicab Does the vehicle have an illuminated sign? YES NO If yes, describe 4 • P180 List any legends on top of vehicle ,t/gr License plate number 76 */ 7A 1, f Vehicle # /Bcy, 41ha/ �7 �! Make . Passenger Capacity 5' Model Year Color Scheme of Vehicle ����nia or o�disti� able characteristics icab Does the vehicle have an illuminated sign? YES NO If yes, describe List any legends on top of vehicle / 2w License plate number 76 This application must be signed below by the individual applicant or partner or an officer • if the applicant is a partnership or corporation. The undersigned as C`k'71 QjeQgTipt (MC9 hereby declares under penalty of perjury, that the information contained in this application for a permit is true and correct. Signature / yt/ Date Vneeta?S� 5 P181 List any legends on top of vehicle License plate number Vehicle # Make Model Year Passenger Capacity Color Scheme of Vehicle Insignia or other distinguishable characteristics of taxicab Does the vehicle have an illuminated sign? YES NO If yes, describe List any legends on top of vehicle License plate number This application must be signed below by the individual applicant or partner or an officer if the applicant is a partnership or corporation. The undersigned a?4y cQ Sof tha Cite hereby declares under penalty of perjury, that the inftion contained in this application for a permit true and correct. Signature 2./ Date M"'T °rg/ clD/J 5 • POMON-3 PY82 California INSURANCE IDENTIFICATION CARD (STATE) COMPANY NUMBER COMPANY © COMMERCIAL El PERSONAL Scottsdale Insurance Co POLICY NUMBER EFFECTIVE DATE EXPIRATION DATE CAS0100210 02/16/15 02/16/16 YEAR MAKE/MODEL VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 2004 TOY0#917 JTDKB22U540106545 AGENCY/COMPANY ISSUING CARD ISU Ins Svcs of Irvine LLC 18022 Cowan,Suite 226 Irvine,CA 92614 949-419-2100 INSUREDS Rykal, LLC dba Yellow Cab 760-423-5272 72048 Woburn Court L.Thousand Palms,CA 92276 SEE IMPORTANT NOTICE ON REVERSE SIDE THIS CARD MUST BE KEPT IN THE INSURED VEHICLE AND PRESENTED UPON DEMAND IN CASE OF ACCIDENT: Report all accidents to your Agent/Company as soon as possible.Obtain the following information: 1. Name and address of each driver, passenger and witness. 2. Name of Insurance Company and policy number for each vehicle involved. THE FRONT OF THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS AN ARTIFICIAL WATERMARK-HOLD AT AN ANGLE TO VIEW ACORD N WM(2007/03) O ACORD CORPORATION 1993-2D37.All rights reserved. THE MINES PRESS.INC.,CORTLANDT MANOR.NY 10567 REORDER ITEM NO.423-509 05/26/2015 12:54 9096730142 KJ ENTERPRISES PAGE 01/05 P183 • . THIS VALIDATED REGISTRATION CARD OR A FACSIMILE COPY IS TO BE KEPT WITH THE VEHICLE FOR WHICH IT IS ISSUED, THIS REQUIREMENT DOES NOT APPLY WHEN THE VEHICLE IS LEFT UNATTENDED. IT NEED NOT BE DISPLAYED. PRESENT IT TO ANY PEACE OFFICER UPON DEMAND. IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE A RENEWAL NOTICE, USE THIS FORM TO PAY YOUR RENEWAL FEES OR NOTIFY THE DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES OF THE PLANNED NON-OPERATIONAL STATUS (PNO) OF A- STORED VEHICLE. RENEWAL FEES MUST BE PAID ON OR BEFORE THE REGISTRATION EXPIRATION DATE OR PENALTIES WILL BE DUE PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE SECTIONS 9552 - 9554 . 5 :' • << EVIDENCE OF LIABILITY INSURAN ,aYROM YOUR •- $URANCE COMPANY MUST BE PROVIDED TO THE DEPARTMENT WITH THE PFl ,TENT .AE �R4,011J 0Z.tEES. EVIDENCE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE IS NOT REQUIRED WI' }{ R£CYg.tR P,}' d R N%WAL OF OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLES, TRAILERS, VESSELS, OR IF YOUvFt' t :`i ;BTKY,'^;g1Y'';Ig•:'VEHICLE. .. ...'.'F...... 4—":,:,,,,,I 'a �I .`•`x' •° f WHEN WRITING TO DMV, ALWAYS GTVE:-1f0.UR-, FULL1�?r , PRESENT ADDRESS, AND THE VEHICLE MAKE, LICENSE, AND IDE ,iP A416AUMt. ERS . '».-.- YcE ************** DO NOT DETACH - REGISTERED OWNER INFORMATION ************** `1 Ilil II!-11 _III 1111u IIII� III I�IUhIIUI11111UtIII I IUfIII II IIIII�IIIUII IIIII I a III INI 1 REGISTRATION CARD VALID FROM: 09/30/2014 TO: 09/30/2015 MARE YR MODEL YR 1ST SOLD VLF CLASS 'YR TYPE VFR TYPE LIC LICENSE NUMBER TOYT 2004 2004 AL 2015 32X 31 76415X1 DODY TYPE MODEL NP MO A% AC ¶JNADEV/G/CLW VEHICLE ID NUMBER TX Q WS 2 B 02920 JTDKB22U540106545 TYPE VEHICLE USE DATE ISSUED CC/ALCO DT FEE RECVD PTC usi TAX COMMERCIAL 05/26/15 36 05/26/15 3 145 PR/HIST: TAXI PR EXP DATE: 09/30/2015 REGISTERED OMNER AMOUNT PAID RYKAL LLC ��.1��-�:; $ 160.00 DBA YELLOW CAB , .' t*/1 AMOUNT RECVD 10625 MONTE VISTA AVE vJ 1,4 ' ,160;:00'`' CASH : MONTCLAIR /;!`• -ti4. (°, T CA 91763 :_: ?l`:;:,. , nmown -L.__ i.er.tc- `-. ) ;Rya -- _ aI POMON-3 X84 California INSURANCE IDENTIFICATION CARD (STATE) COMPANY NUMBER COMPANY © COMMERCIAL 0 PERSONAL Scottsdale Insurance Co POLICY NUMBER EFFECTIVE DATE EXPIRATION DATE CAS0100210 02/16/15 02/16/16 YEAR WJ(EI MODEL VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 2004 TOY0k913 JTDKB22U640106585 AGENCY/COMPANY ISSUING CARD ISU Ins Svcs of Irvine LLC 18022 Cowan,Suite 225 Irvine,CA 92614 949-419-2100 INSUREDr Rykal,LLC dba Yellow Cab 760-423-5272 72048 Woburn Court L.Thousand Palms,CA 92276 SEE IMPORTANT NOTICE ON REVERSE SIDE THIS CARD MUST BE KEPT IN THE INSURED VEHICLE AND PRESENTED UPON DEMAND IN CASE OF ACCIDENT: Report all accidents to your Agent/Company as soon as possible.Obtain the following information: 1. Name and address of each driver,passenger and witness. 2. Name of Insurance Company and policy number for each vehicle involved. THE FRONT OF THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS AN ARTIFICIAL WATERMARK-HOLD AT AN ANGLE TO VIEW AGGRO MI V/M(2007100) O ACORD CORPORATION 19812007.All ABIt/.served THE MINES PRESS.INC.,CORTIANDT MANOR.NY 10567 REORDER ITEM NO.423-509 05/26/2015 12:54 9096730142 KJ ENTERPRISES PAGE 02/05 P185 • 1 THIS VALIDATED REGISTRATION CARD OR A FACSIMILE COPY IS TO BE KEPT WITH THE VEHICLE FOR WHICH IT IS ISSUED. THIS REQUIREMENT DOES NOT APPLY WHEN THE VEHICLE IS LEFT UNATTENDED. IT NEED NOT BE DISPLAYED. PRESENT IT TO ANY PEACE OFFICER UPON DEMAND. IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE A RENEWAL NOTICE, USE THIS FORM TO PAY YOUR RENEWAL FEES OR NOTIFY THE DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES OF THE PLANNED NON-OPERATIONAL STATUS (PNO) .OF A STORED VEHICLE. RENEWAL FEES MUST BE PAID ON OR BEFORE THE REGISTRATION EXPIRATION DATE OR PENALTIES WILL BE DUE PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE SECTIONS 9552 - 9554 . EVIDENCE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE;s.FROM YOUR::INSOBANCE COMPANY MUST BE PROVIDED TO THE DEPARTMENT WITH THE P{iiy(E.NT.;9F,_FENESI7P.li .E/•EES. EVIDENCE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE IS NOT REQUIRED wlgW.REGYSfiRA ON•;`RPNEWAL OF OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLES, TRAILERS, VESSELS, OR IF YOitFfi.* y. PNO N''rHS:%VEHICLE. ,,. _- WHEN WRITING TO DMV, ALWAYS GIVBAO0R4ULDITNAME, PRESENT ADDRESS, AND THE VEHICLE MAKE, LICENSE, AND IDEtV'f•11!4t ,'AT.TIS'•IQUMBERS. ************** DO NOT DETACH - REGISTERED OWNER INFORMATION ************** III H 11111. 1 IMI I CI I h I I B iii tI 11 IIIiil. 11I 1 I III 1 . REGISTRATION CARD VALID FROM: 09/30/2014 TO: 09/30/2015 MARE YR MODEL YR 15T SOLD VLF CLASS .YR TYPE WV TYPE LIt LICENSE NUl®ER TOYT 2004 2004 AL 2015 32X 31 76417K1 BODY TYPE MODEL NP MO AE WC UNLADEN/D/COM • VEHICLE ID NUMBER TX Q WS 2 B 02900 .TTDKB22U640106555 TYPE VEHICLE USE DATE ISSUED CC/ALCO DT FEE RECVD Pxc USE TAX COMMERCIAL 05/26/15 36 05/26/15 3 145 PR/HIST: TAXI PR EXP DATE: 09/30/2015 REGISTERED OWNER AMOUNT PAID RYKAL LLC $ 160.00 UBA YELLOW CAB ^:;J OUNi.AUe' �;•;., AMOUNT RECPD 10625 MONTE VISTA AVE .0%.':7 O" .CHCK MONTCLAIR CA 91763 L.IDNMCLDEN POMON-3 Y 186 California INSURANCE IDENTIFICATION CARD F' (STATE) COMPANY NUMBER COMPANY COMMERCIAL PERSONAL Scottsdale Insurance Co POLICY NUMBER EFFECTIVE DATE EXPIRATION DATE CAS0100210 02/16/15 02/16/16 YEAR MAKE/MODEL VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 2008 TOYO#906 JTDKB20U287735700 AGENCY/COMPANY ISSUING CARD ISU Ins Svcs of Irvine LLC 18022 Cowan,Suite 225 Irvine,CA 92614 949-419-2100 INSURED r Rykal, LLC dba Yellow Cab 160-423-5272 72048 Wobum Court L Thousand Palms,CA 92276 SEE IMPORTANT NOTICE ON REVERSE SIDE THIS CARD MUST BE KEPT IN THE INSURED VEHICLE AND PRESENTED UPON DEMAND IN CASE OF ACCIDENT: Report all accidents to your Agent/Company as soon as possible. Obtain the following information: 1. Name and address of each driver,passenger and witness. 2. Name of Insurance Company and policy number for each vehicle involved. THE FRONT OF THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS AN ARTIFICIAL WATERMARK-HOW AT AN ANGLE TO VIEW ACORD 60 WM(700710.1) OACORD CORPORATION 1993-2007.AD right mewed THE MINES PRESS,INC..CORTLANDT MANOR,NY 10557 REORDER REM NO.4123-509 05/26/2015 12:54 9098730142 KJ ENTERPRISES PAGE 03/05 P187 • THIS VALIDATED REGISTRATION CARD OR A FACSIMILE COPY IS TO BE KEPT WITH THE VEHICLE FOR WHICH IT IS ISSUED_ THIS REQUIREMENT DOES NOT APPLY WHEN THE VEHICLE IS LEFT UNATTENDED. IT NEED NOT BE DISPLAYED. PRESENT IT TO ANY PEACE OFFICER UPON DEMAND. IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE A RENEWAL NOTICE, USE THIS FORM TO PAY YOUR RENEWAL FEES OR NOTIFY THE DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES OF THE PLANNED NON-OPERATIONAL STATUS (PNO) OF A STORED VEHICLE. RENEWAL FEES MUST BE PAID ON OR BEFORE THE REGISTRATION EXPIRATION DATE OR PENALTIES WILL BE DUE PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE SECTIONS 9552 - 9554. EVIDENCE OF LIABILITY INSURANQ?E4ROM YQUR•4NSURANCE COMPANY MUST BE PROVIDED TO THE DEPARTMENT WITH THE P404ENT QF,.•IENEWAL'FEES. EVIDENCE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE IS NOT REQUIRED WITH. REGT$TRAT-,;YO13 flENEWAL OF OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLES, TRAILERS, VESSELS, OR IF YOU; 1..YF,r4•: PN(Q QN.tHE'.4EHICLE. WHEN WRITING TO DMV, ALWAYS G'FVE .Oun , u414isTAb , PRESENT ADDRESS, AND THE VEHICLE MAKE, LICENSE, AND IDE TOICATZWMUF1BERS. :;'_- ************** DO NOT DETACH - REGISTERED OWNER INFORMATION ************** 096 1 IIII 1 I11 :1111111111 IIIH liii 11111111 Ni 111EV lIh I liii ilII II lI II II • REGISTRATION CARD VALID FROM: 07/31/2014 TO: 07/31/2015 HAKE YR MODEL YR 2ST SOLD VLF CLASS 'YR TYPE VELA TYPE LIC cILRNSE LAUNDER TOYT 2008 2008 AQ 2015 37X 31 76450D1 DPOY TYPE MODEL HP W0 A]t WC UNLADCN/G/CGW VEHICLE ID NUMBER TX Q WS 2 B 02960. JTDKB20U287735700 TYPE VEHICLE USE DATE ISSUED CC/ALCO DT FEE RECYD PIC USE TAE COMMERCIAL 05/26/15 36 05/26/15 3 211 PR/HIST: SALVAGED PR EXP DATE: 07/31/2015 REGISTERED OWNER AMOUNT PAID RYKAL LLC $ 226.00 10625 MONTE VISTA AVE .=;:%;NyDNr.qucj c;;: AMOUNT RECVD ,$'''; ,2 6,.'0'.l7 ''CASH t'-,;:•.`, CK :! .% MONTCLAIR j=': v---: ..0 DT CA 91763 LIENNOLDER _ _ POMON-3 PI 88 California INSURANCE IDENTIFICATION CARD (STATE) COMPANY NUMBER COMPANY © COMMERCIAL D PERSONAL Scottsdale Insurance Co POLICY NUMBER EFFECTIVE DATE EXPIRATION DATE CAS0100210 02/16/15 02/16/16 YEAR MAKFJMODEL VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 2007 TOYO#900 JTDKB20U973235037 AGENCY/COMPANY ISSUING CARD ISU Ins Svcs of Irvine LLC 18022 Cowan,Suite 225 Irvine,CA 92614 949-419-2100 INSURED Rykal, LLC dba Yellow Cab 760-423-5272 72048 Wobum Court L Thousand Palms,CA 92276 SEE IMPORTANT NOTICE ON REVERSE SIDE THIS CARD MUST BE KEPT IN THE INSURED VEHICLE AND PRESENTED UPON DEMAND IN CASE OF ACCIDENT: Report all accidents to your Agent/Company as soon as possible.Obtain the following information: 1. Name and address of each driver,passenger and witness. 2. Name of Insurance Company and policy number for each vehicle involved. THE FRONT OF THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS AN ARTIFICIAL WATERMARK-HOW AT AN ANGLE TO VIEW ACORD 60 WM(20071031 OACDRD CORPORATION 19934007. All HpMs moved. THE MINES PRESS.INC.,CORTLANDT MANOR.NY 10567 REORDER ITEM NO.423-509 05/26/2015 12:54 909O730142 KJ ENTERPRISES PAGE 05/05 P189 1 THIS VALIDATED REGISTRATION CARD OR A FACSIMILE COPY IS TO BE KEPT WITH THE VESICLE FOR WHICH IT IS ISSUED. THIS REQUIREMENT DOES NOT APPLY WHEN THE VEHICLE IS LEFT UNATTENDED. IT NEED NOT BE DISPLAYED. PRESENT IT TO ANY PEACE OFFICER UPON DEMAND. IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE A RENEWAL NOTICE, USE THIS FORM TO PAY YOUR RENEWAL FEES OR NOTIFY THE DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES OF THE PLANNED NON-OPERATIONAL STATUS (PNO) OF A STORED VEHICLE. RENEWAL FEES MUST BE PAID ON OR BEFORE THE REGISTRATION EXPIRATION DATE OR PENALTIES WILL BE DUE PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE SECTIONS 9552 - 9554 . EVIDENCE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE':FROM YOUR:,:I?gSURANCE COMPANY MST BE PROVIDED TO THE DEPARTMENT WITH THE PAYMENT OF RENEWAL FEES . EVIDENCE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE IS NOT REQUIRED WITH> REGISTRATION.. REN'EWAL OF OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLES, TRAILERS, VESSELS, OR IF YOU:-FILE .A PNO ,ON'THE ;VEHICLE . WHEN WRITING TO DNV, ALWAYS GIVE.. YOUR,.FULL:"NANE, PRESENT ADDRESS, AND THE VEHICLE MAKE, LICENSE, AND IDENTIFICAttON::-NUMAER.S . ""****** "** *** DO NOT DETACH - REGISTERED OWNER INFORMATION * *** * gi6 -****" Ih I IIit III 11111111111 III 1,11 11111111111 11111 1111111111 II I REGISTRATION CARD VALID FROM: 12/31/2014 TO: 12/31/2015 Mkt YR MODE YR 1ST SCLD VLF OCAS; •Y0. TYPE VEX TYPE L:C L:CLVSE Y.O:yER TOYT 2007 0000 AQ 2015 32x 31 99360H1 BODY TYPE L^_DEL HP YZ AX WC UJJLADCWCJC# vU91CLE ID NUMBER TX Q WS 2 B 02940 JTDKB20U973235037 TYPE VEHICLE USE DATE ISSUED CC/A+.Cn = FEE RECn USE TAX COMMERCIAL 05/26/15 36 05/26/15 3 198 PR/HIST: SALVAGED PR EXP DATE: 12/31/2015 •°risTEREO ch::EA hYZONT PAID RYKAL LLC $ 213 . 00 DBA YELLOW CAB - r.J ]4D DUE:' AMOUNT RECVJ 10625 MONTE VISTA AVE ` �213 .VO...CASH 2 . CHCR MONTCLAIR 'CRDT CA 91763 . - . LIENMOLDER POMON-3 15190 California INSURANCE IDENTIFICATION CARD (STATE) COMPANY NUMBER COMPANY © COMMERCIAL PERSONAL Scottsdale Insurance Co POLICY NUMBER EFFECTIVE DATE EXPIRATION DATE CAS0100210 02/16/15 02/16/16 YEAR MAKE/MODEL VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 2007 TOYO#903 JTDKB200977627170 AGENCY/COMPANY ISSUING CARD ISU Ins Svcs of Irvine LLC 18022 Cowan,Suite 225 Irvine,CA 92614 949419.2100 INSURED Rykal, LLC dba Yellow Cab 760-4235272 72048 Woburn Court L Thousand Palms,CA 92276 SEE IMPORTANT NOTICE ON REVERSE SIDE THIS CARD MUST BE KEPT IN THE INSURED VEHICLE AND PRESENTED UPON DEMAND IN CASE OF ACCIDENT: Report all accidents to your Agent/Company as soon as possible.Obtain the following information: 1. Name and address of each driver,passenger and witness. 2. Name of Insurance Company and policy number for each vehicle involved. THE FRONT OF THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS AN ARTIFICIAL WATERMARK•HOLD AT AN ANGLE TO VIEW ACORD 60 WM(200003) 0 ACORD CORPORATION 19953007.AD rights mend. THE MINES PRESS.INC..CORTLANDT MANOR,NY 10567 REORDER ITEM NO.423509 05/26/2015 12:54 9098730142 KJ ENTERPRISES PAGE Dq/05 P191 I THIS VALIDATED REGISTRATION CARD OR A FACSIMILE COPY IS TO BE KEPT WITH THE VEHICLE FOR WHICH IT I5 ISSUED. THIS REQUIREMENT DOES NOT APPLY WHEN THE VEHICLE IS LEFT UNATTENDED. IT NEED NOT BE DISPLAYED. PRESENT IT TO ANY PEACE OFFICER UPON DEMAND. IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE A RENEWAL NOTICE, USE THIS FORM TO PAY YOUR RENEWAL FEES OR NOTIFY THE DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES OF THE PLANNED NON-OPERATIONAL STATUS (PNO) OF A STORED VEHICLE. RENEWAL FEES MUST BE PAID ON OR BEFORE THE REGISTRATION EXPIRATION DATE OR PENALTIES WILL BE DUE PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE SECTIONS 9552 - 9554 . EVIDENCE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE FROM YOUR'_';INSURANCE COMPANY MUST BE PROVIDED TO THE DEPARTMENT WITH THE ROIENT .OF RENE11AL FEES. EVIDENCE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE TS NOT REQUIRED WI`1'H REGISTRATION RENEWAL OF OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLES, TRAILERS, VESSELS, OR IF YOU FItEiA PNO: :OIV'THE •VEHICLE. WHEN WRITING TO DMV, ALWAYS GIVE .YOUR PULL 'AME, PRESENT ADDRESS, AND THE VEHICLE MAKE, LICENSE, AND IDENTIFtCAtIONUMBERS . ****** **** ** DO NOT DETACH - REGISTERED OWNER INFORMATION • ** *******w*** 0 1 111111111111111111111111 ff1111 IU 1 IO11IIIN REGISTRATION CARD VALID FROM: 04/30/2015 TO: 04/30/2016 MARE 'YR MODEL YR 15T SOLD VLF CLASS 'VR TYRE TEN TYPE LIC LxCLVSG' MUMMER TOY? 2007 2007 AQ 2015 32X 31 99427H1 BODY -VPE MODEL MP IM AX 'NC UNLADE)/G/Cw VEIICLE ID NUM!? TX Q WS 2 B 02880 JTDKB20U977627170 TY?! VEiIICLE VS4 DATE ISSUED CC/ALCO )T FEE c PIC USE TAX COMMERCIAL 05/26/15 36 05/26/15 3 198 PR/HIST: TAXI PR EXP DATE: 04/30/2016 RED:5TER2.^, flmrp AMOUNT PAID RYKAL LLC S 213 . 00 DBA YELLOW CAB :. ;�;;y_$..ni.'pve -:',.,.. AMOUNT RECw 10625 MONTE VISTA AVE .,$' -213,. 00. CHCK : MONTCLAIR CA 91753 LIES"C-LDER I' _ -. POMON-3 OP 0182 A`on°' CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE D 02( YYYY) 02/225/205/2015 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER,AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder Is an ADDITIONAL INSURED,the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED,subject to the terms and conditions of the policy,certain policies may require an endorsement A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder In lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER Phone: 949-419-2100 CONTACT Win Youngblood ISU Ins Svcs of Irvine LLC Fax:949-955-1478 PHONE un:949 19-2135 FAX 18022 Cowan,Suite 225 Twc.N Nel: 949-955-1478 Irvine,CA 92614 ADDRESS:wyoungblood @isuirvine.com Mike Scanlon INSURER(S)AFFORDING COVERAGE NAICtl INSURER A:Scottsdale Insurance Co 41297 INSURED Pomona Valley Yellow Cab LLC INSURERS: 72048 Woburn Court INSURER C: Thousand Palms,CA 92276 INSURER D: INSURER E: INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POUCY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. ILTR TYPE OF INSURANCE NRL Styyp POLICY NUMBER IMM/DDCO WYII IMM(DD�) UNITS GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE I$ DAMAGE TO RENTED COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY PREMISES(Ea occurrence) 5 CLAIMS-MADE n OCCUR MED EXP(Any ono person) PERSONALS ADV INJURY 5 GENERAL AGGREGATE S GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PEW PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG S n POLICY n Ti n LOC AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT 1,000,000 (en accident) S A ANY AUTO X CAS0100210 02/16/2015 02/1612016 BODILY INJURY(Per person) 5 AU x SCHEDULED BODILY INJURY(Per acsidonl) S NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE HIRED AUTOS _ AUTOS (Per accident) 5 UMBRELLA(JAB OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE 5 _ EXCESS LIAB I CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE 5 DED I RETENTIONS 5 WORKERS COMPENSATION WCSTATU- 0TH- AND EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY Y I N TORY LIMITS I ER ANY PROPRIETORJPARTNERJEXECLITIVE n NIA EL EACH ACCIDENT OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? (Mandatory In NH) E.L DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE S If yes.describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below EL DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT 5 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS I VEHICLES (Attach ACORD lot,Additonal Remarks Schedule,If more space Is required) CERTIFICATE HOLDER IS NAMED ADDITIONAL INSURED TINDER THE AUTO LIABILITY AS RESPECTS OPERATIONS OF 'Pat, NAMED INSURED. • CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. BUSINESS LICENSE DEPARTMENT AUTHOR/ZED REPRESENTATIVE 10500 CIVIC CENTER DR n CJOIV�T-OVA RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 (1(1 S 1 ©1980-2010 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25(2010/05) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD P193 gmboa, Minerva From: Yancy, Michelle Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 11:21 AM To: Gamboa, Minerva Subject: DOJ The following Taxi applicants passed DOJ 9/2/14: 1Yimissuais • Jhanetta Kheres Sae Yana/ City of Rancho Cucamonga Human Resources Technician 909-477-2700 ext 2412 909-477-2734 Fax michelle.vancy@cityofrc.us • rl .s..+ - r � ow Your Numbers Wellness Program 1 . P194 • U O . C1, , O O M • 00 O v O c +:, a • U OJ Ul N O U O CL U Z L N °6 o Q- o 2 X c ▪L 0 4-I E (p c 2 « N U > CO ■/ LL C E O N O C N > ` 0 m W O O io y ro = C 0 U C Co a o al C Sa >i ▪L 3 a o v N a E E ,o oa E - o a a > c C a, J -p 3 " o C CO • N i o v E Y -c c c u a a CU CO aJ o N p u v v a v a a p m o c U w > w , C a V .- V O S in CC c v ,� N a CO c a :}J u n C N o c N o a Ca o a w no o m E a a v v —° .Y a E `u° w e a ° ra u L N .">' u v .� .a u uL. O C y CO O cd O a! U C J u N ro J J C = p a p O 'j C CL c m u u a, � a Y E a fO a s io a, v o U O C . O cu -c O .0 u r v 0 0 a _0'O N to • a m a c U' u >- p a « a, a v u c u 0 C c J Cc N _ to U W 'X lc i V_ y '> d 0 v N N lb`a la 0 Ia no Yp a1 N C « Q� 3 a h O O J a > 'O N 4-, -_ C 9 ro N N V X O p a a ' -o O. O .O ro C aN1 C a1 N C u v N a C c C c c V1 Y 19 p C co .� OD c 0.0 -o c 0 0 _0 'o cu co a u " a N c c U -0 a a C i R a. u '> !^ u Co a O 0 0 p, N '> a a a > . a m U 3 in > �' c aci v C `o ro N 0 C to m .X a .� _N p a s o N .E N N u o u a = c a co ro o c c E o C E o J P a u c L u n a v H to v s > a > o a) y v w > E o . u C u Y a O a.p 3 N y > N O p a o ro Co 0 U J co N al C To O a a « a N L > m v O N a) N C ` LL a) `CO a ric .r 0 J u '6 u O J °a 0 ro al 0 OD N v 0 'p a 0 -o a ,a d C a y C d C L- . y C y N a Co a E " a !' U ra, a in m m o c Co v 3 CA m Cr H =I- Co H 0 W a L a L > p ro co = E a C C "O al N s.. H H ro F .o a s u H V aL. U N co r E P195 Summary of Current Taxicab Services in the City of Rancho Cucamonga The Business License Division of the Finance Department facilitates the issuance of taxicab service permits and taxicab drivers permits. Currently, the City has two permitted taxicab service companies operating in the City. Those companies are Bell Cab and Express Transportation Systems DBA Checker Cab/AA Inland Empire Cab. Bell Cab • • Began providing services on September 3, 1998 • Currently have a total of eighteen (18) taxicab drivers that are permitted in the City • Their rates are as follows: $2.50 — pick up fee (includes first 1/10 mile) $0.25 —each additional 1/10 mile $2.50 — per mile thereafter $26.00 — per hour waiting time and/or traffic delay Express Transportation Systems DBA Checker Cab/AA Inland Empire Cab • Approved by City Council on August 6, 2014 • Currently have one (1) driver in the city • Their rates are as follows: $2.50 — pick up fee (includes first 1/10 mile) $0.25 —each additional 1/10 mile • $2.50 — per mile thereafter $26.00 — per hour waiting time and/or traffic delay Diversified Transportation, LLC DBA Yellow Cab • Began providing services on August 1, 2001 and CLOSED February 16, 2015 • Currently have a total of sixty two (62) taxicab drivers that are permitted in the city • Their rates are as follows: $2.50 — pick up fee (includes first 1/10 mile) $0.25 — each additional 1/10 mile $2.50— per mile thereafter $26.00 — per hour waiting time and/or traffic delay P196 ' RII i,6 DFA NEAAJAA) Meter Rates the, Rancho Cucamonga $2.50 Flag Drop (First 1 /10th Mile) Each Additional 1 /10th of a mile 0.25 Each 34 Seconds Traffic Delay 0.25 . Waiting Time $26.00 Per Hour One to Five Passengers Same Fare P197 STAFF REPORT k ADNIINISTRATIVE SERVICES GROUP bilge J Date: August 5, 2015 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services • By: Chris Bopko, Management Analyst III Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL THE RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND ASSESSMENTS, APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS, AND ORDER THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO'S. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 AND 10, INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016. ti RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the Resolution confirming the Diagrams and Assessments, approve the Annual Engineer's Reports, and order the levy and collection of assessments within Landscape Maintenance District No's. 1, 2, 3A, 38, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 and 10. The Engineer's Reports are on file in the City Clerk's Office. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS • Each year, per the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City is required to hold a public hearing to receive public comment on the levy and collection of assessments within Landscape Maintenance (LMD) No's. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 and 10 (each a "District" and collectively the "Districts"). This requirement must be accomplished before the City can submit the annual assessments for placement on the County Tax Roll. This year, the City will place on the County Tax Roll eleven (11) Landscape Maintenance Districts (LMDs). The assessments received for each of these Districts are utilized for the maintenance and operation of parks and other landscaping. Maintenance and operation includes but is not limited to turf, ground cover, planter beds, shrubs, plants and trees, landscape lighting, irrigation systems, electrical energy for irrigation controllers, insect/disease control, graffiti removal, hardscapes, entry signs, sound walls and all associated appurtenant facilities. The City utilizes prior year carryovers along with current year assessment revenues to meet the district's annual expenses. When the LMDs were established, they were in conjunction with new development coming into the City, and were intentionally designed to ensure that each district bore the costs of the maintenance of the infrastructure that provides special benefit to the property owners. In certain LMD's, it has been over 20 years since there was an assessment increase. However, no rate increase can occur unless the City conducts an election process to give the property owners the opportunity to express their support for, or in opposition to, an increase in such assessment. Over the last several years, Prop 218 election processes were held in LMDs 2, 4-R and 6-R, and updated assessments were approved by the property owners in those districts. LMD 8 held a Prop 218 election with a result of a majority protest; the City reduced services to meet the district budget requirements. P198 CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL THE RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND ASSESSMENTS, APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS, AND ORDER THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO'S. 1, 2, 3A, 3B,4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 AND 10, INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016. AUGUST 5,2015 PAGE 2 Over the last two years, City staff has engaged the community with a public outreach program and phone surveys to inform property owners about the status of their West-Side parks, landscaping and street lighting districts and to determine their willingness to approve redistricting with new rate structures to meet the fiscal challenges of the districts. This proposed district would replace the existing PD 85, Landscape Maintenance Districts 1, 3A, 3B, and 5, and Street Lighting Districts 2 and 6. These districts would be completely dissolved and their assessments eliminated upon the formation of the proposed district and approval of the levy of special taxes within such district by the qualified electors of such district. At the City Council meeting of July 1, 2015, the City Council unanimously voted to move forward the replacement district for consideration by the voters on the November 2015 ballot. In the meantime, the City has enacted a set of budget-balancing measures that are adequate in the near term to bring revenues and expenditures into alignment. The measures include staff reductions, expanding the use of contract mowing services, reducing the maintenance of site amenities (lights, playgrounds, sand, etc.) to the most basic levels, and providing less direct support to sports groups using sports fields. In certain other landscape maintenance districts, raise increases are required this year to keep pace with rising costs, especially for water. The assessment rates and descriptions for each of the Landscape Maintenance Districts are as follows. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parks and parkways. The current assessment rate is $92.21 per single-family residence, and the multi- family is $46.11 per dwelling unit. As previously noted, this district's budget is balanced only as a result of significant reductions in services. LMD 1 is one of the districts proposed to be dissolved • and replaced by the new West-side District. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways, paseos and parks within the Victoria neighborhood. The assessment rate for FY 2015/16 will increase to $464.97 per single family residence. This is a rate increase of 0.64% as compared to the prior year rate of $462.00 per single-family residence. The revised condominium rate is $342.18 per dwelling unit and the multi-family rate is $325.47 per dwelling unit. The commercial rate is $2,198.04 per acre, the Public Service parcels are $126.81 per acre, and the vacant rate is $92.99 per acre. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways on Hyssop Drive. The current assessment rate is $413.74 per acre for commercial property. LMD 3A is one of the districts proposed to be dissolved and replaced by the new West- side District. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways within the commercial and industrial area of the City. The current assessment rate is $352.80 per acre for commercial property. LMD 3B is one of the districts proposed to be dissolved and replaced by the new West-side District. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways, paseos and parks within the Terra Vista planned community. The assessment rate for P199 CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL THE RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND ASSESSMENTS, APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS, AND ORDER THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO'S. 1, 2, 3A, 3B,4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8,9 AND 10, INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016. AUGUST 5,2015 PAGts 3 FY 2015/16 will increase to $408.21 per single-family residence, an increase of 4.29% as compared to the prior year rate of $391.40 per single-family residence. The revised condominium rate is $326.57 per dwelling unit and the multi-family rate is $285.75 per dwelling unit. The commercial rate is $1,326.68 per acre, and the vacant rate is $102.05 per acre. Until 2014, rates in this district had not been increased since FY 10-11. However, this created a structural budget deficit. Over the last two fiscal years rates have been increased to bring revenues and expenses nearly into alignment in this district. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of the Andover tot lot located on the southwest corner of Andover Place and Bedford Drive. The current assessment rate is $56.65 per single-family residence. LMD 5 is one of the districts proposed for proposed to be dissolved and replaced by the new West-side District. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways and paseos within the Caryn planned community. The assessment rate for Fiscal Year 2015/16 will increase to $393.17 per single-family residence in Zone 1 and to $294.88 per single family residence in Zone 2. This is a rate increase of 0.82% as compared to the Fiscal Year 2014/15 rates. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways and paseos within the Etiwanda Highlands Community. The current assessment rate is $307.05 per single-family residence. This district will require property owners to consider a rate increase in the near future, in order to maintain service levels. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways in South Etiwanda. The current assessment rate is $151.45 per single-family residence. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways and Garcia Park in South Etiwanda. The current assessment rate is $80.00 per single- family residence. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 assessments pay for the on-going maintenance of parkways, trails and parks in the District. The assessment rate for Fiscal Year 2015/16 will increase to $711.71 per single-family residence and $1,423.42 per acre for commercial property, an increase of 10% over the prior year rate of $647.01 per single-family residence. Until 2014, rates in this district had not been increased for seven (7) years. However, this created a structural budget deficit. Over the last two fiscal years rates have been increased to bring revenues and expenses nearly into alignment in this district. Attachments Resolutions P200 RESOLUTION NO. 15-156 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND ASSESSMENTS, APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND ORDERING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO'S. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 AND 10, INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 15th day of July, 2015, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 15-121 (the "Resolution of Intention") pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, as amended (the "1972 Act"), declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments within Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R and 7 through 10, inclusive (each a "District" and collectively the "Districts") for Fiscal Year 2015/2016 and giving notice of the time and place for a public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessments within the Districts; and WHEREAS, the City Council previously received and preliminarily approved a report of the Assessment Engineer (each an "Annual Engineer's Report" and collectively the "Annual Engineer's Reports") for each District as required pursuant to Article 4 of Chapter 1 of the 1972 Act, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"); and WHEREAS, subsequent to the preliminary approval of the Annual Engineer's Reports, the Assessment Engineer revised each of the Annual Engineer's Reports (each a "Revised Annual Engineer's Report" and collectively the "Revised Annual Engineer's Reports") to add to such reports information regarding the annexations, if any, to each applicable District during Fiscal Year 2015-2016 and to make certain other insubstantial formatting revisions to the summary of assessments and the District budgets that did not result in an increase of the expenditure budget for the Districts, or any one of them, or the aggregate assessments or any individual assessment proposed to be levied within the Districts, or any one, of them; and WHEREAS, notice of such public hearing was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by the Assessment Law, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the Office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom, and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: P201 SECTION 1. This City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. Notice of the public hearing has been given and the proceedings for the consideration of the levy of the annual assessments within each District have been undertaken in accordance with the 1972 Act; and b. The annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2015/2016 proposed to be levied within each District as set forth in the applicable Revised Annual Engineer's Report do not exceed the annual assessments as previously authorized to be levied within such District, and therefore, the proposed levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2015/2016 within such District are not deemed to be "increased" over the maximum authorized annual assessments. SECTION 2. The final assessments and diagrams for the proceedings, as contained in the Revised Annual Engineer's Report for each of the Districts, is hereby approved and confirmed. The assessments for the Districts contained in the Revised Annual Engineer's Reports for Fiscal Year 2015/2016 are hereby levied upon the respective lots or parcels in the . Districts in the amounts as set forth in the applicable Revised Annual Engineer's Report. SECTION 3. This City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in the Resolution of Intention, be done and made. SECTION 4. The above-referenced diagram and assessment shall be filed in the Office of the City Clerk. Said diagram and assessment, and the certified copy thereof, shall be open for public inspection. SECTION 5. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to immediately file a certified copy of the diagram and assessment with the County Auditor. Such filing shall be made no later than the 3rd Monday in August 2015. SECTION 6. After the filing of the diagram and assessment, the County Auditor shall enter on the County assessment roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount assessed thereupon, as shown in the assessment. SECTION 7. The assessments shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as County taxes are collected, and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of County taxes shall apply to the collection and enforcement of the assessments. SECTION 8. The assessments as above confirmed and levied for these proceedings will provide revenue and relate to the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2015 and ending June 30, 2016. P202 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of August, 2015. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on , 2015. Executed this , at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P203 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2015/2016 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) P2O4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tern William Alexander, Council Member Lynne B. Kennedy, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology Dean Rodia, Parks & Landscape Superintendent Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P205 TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Letter 1 Introduction 3 Reason for Assessment Process for Annual Assessment Plans and Specifications 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District Description of Improvements and Services Map of Improvements Estimate of Costs 21 District Budget Definitions of Budget Items Method of Assessment 24 General General Benefit Special Benefit Method of Assessment Spread Assessment Diagram 28 Assessment Roll 30 Assessment Roll Annexations • P2O6 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 15, 2015 the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 15-119, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2015/16 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2015/16 Total Estimated Assessment $ 1,222,530.00 • Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 44,770.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 1,267,300.00 Less Operating Reserve Fund Contribution (67,660.00) Total Expenditure Budget $ 1,199,640.00 Total District EBU Count 13,258.16 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 92.21 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $ 92.21 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P207 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirely of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefitted Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Annual Engineer's Report, Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. fl3672 g s- CN3. ar A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer • Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P208 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P209 written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold a community meeting with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If the is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P210 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City which is not located within the City's planned development communities. The District is made up of various landscaped sites throughout the City. As such, the parcels within the District do not represent a distinct district area as do the other LMDs within the City. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements maintained by the District include the paseos, community trails, trees, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the District. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble-shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Bear Gulch Park, East and West Beryl Park, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park, Hermosa Park, and the undeveloped Don Tiburcio Tapia Park. Site # Descriptive Location A-1 The north and south side of Wilson from Hellman to Amethyst. Ground Cover area: 22,982 square feet Hardscape area: 5,694 square feet A-2 The east side of Hellman from 326 feet south of Pepperidge to 73 feet north of Pepperidge. Ground Cover area: 5,810 square feet Hardscape area: 1,600 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P211 A-3 The south side of 19th Street from 62 feet east of Mayberry to 173 feet east of Mayberry. Ground Cover area: 1,680 square feet Hardscape area: 440 square feet A-4 The south side of Wilson from Amethyst to Archibald; the planters and cutouts on the west side of Archibald from Wilson to 105 feet south of Cottonwood. Ground Cover area: 5,625 square feet A-5 The north and south side of Diamond Court from Klusman to Diamond Ave. Ground Cover area: 3,143 square feet Hardscape area: 1,864 square feet A-6 The parkway on the north side of Wilson from 348 feet east of Morning Canyon to Alder Ridge. Ground Cover area: 5,700 square feet Hardscape area: 4,760 square feet A-7 The cutouts and vines on the south side of Wilson from the Alta Loma Channel to 240 feet east of Zapata. Ground Cover area: 911 square feet A-8 The east side of Broken Star from 80 feet south of Highland to Highland; the north side of Highland from Amethyst to Broken Star including wood chip area north of sidewalk, the south side of Highland from Broken Star to Amethyst; the west side of Amethyst from 140 feet south of Highland to 265 feet south of Highland. • Ground Cover area: 6,545 square feet Hardscape area: 2,554 square feet Mulchscape area: 14,005 square feet A-9 The south side of Highland from Hellman to Broken Star. Ground Cover area: 7,865 square feet A-10 The south side of 19th from 170 feet west of Pilgrim to 167 feet east of Pilgrim. Ground Cover area: 1,808 square feet Hardscape area: 1,084 square feet A-11 The east side of Amethyst from Lemon to 230 feet north of Apricot. Ground Cover area: 2,115 square feet Hardscape area: 3,438 square feet A-12 The west side of Sapphire from 710 feet north of Hillside to Hillside. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2015/16 • P212 Ground Cover area: 4,500 square feet A-13 The south side of Victoria from 110 feet west of London to Ramona. Ground Cover area: 2,705 square feet Hardscape area: 3,480 square feet A-14 The west side of Archibald from 273 feet north of La Gloria to Lemon; the La Gloria median from Archibald to Jadeite; the north and south side of La Gloria from Archibald to 53 feet east of Jadeite; the north side of Lemon from Archibald to 55 feet east of Klusman. Ground Cover area: 12,880 square feet Hardscape area: 12,030 square feet A-15 The planters and cutouts on the east side of Archibald from 610 feet south of Cottonwood to Wilson; the south side of Wilson from Archibald to Alta Loma Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,110 square feet A-16 The cutouts and planters on the east side of Archibald from Banyan to 190 feet north of Sunflower. Ground Cover area: 1,580 square feet A-17 The cutouts and planters on the west side of Archibald from 225 feet south of Wilson to Banyan. Ground Cover area: 2,362 square feet A-18 The cutouts and planters on the north side of Banyan from Jadeite to 410 feet west of Jadeite. Ground Cover area: 216 square feet A-19 The cutouts and planters on the east side of Amethyst from 192 feet south of Sunflower to Manzanita. Ground Cover area: 4,325 square feet A-20 The west side of Archibald from 210 feet north of La Colina to 230 feet south of Almond; the south side of La Colina from Archibald to Jadeite. Ground Cover area: 17,120 square feet A-21 The planter adjacent to the equestrian trail from Riverwood to Raspberry north of the County flood retention basin that is west of Chaffey College. Ground Cover area: 22,832 square feet A-22 The west side of Haven from Carrari to Vista Grove. Ground Cover area: 4,572 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P213 A-23 The west side of Haven from 434 feet north of Manzanita to 258 feet south of Manzanita. Ground Cover area: 48,390 square feet Turf area: 5,868 square feet Hardscape area: 4,581 square feet A-24 The south side of 19th from 286 feet east of Amethyst to 166 feet west of Klusman. Ground Cover area: 5,904 square feet Hardscape area: 2,938 square feet A-25 The equestrian trail and planters on the east side of Hermosa from 421 feet south of Whispering Forest to Sun Valley. Ground Cover area: 17,529 square feet A-26 The west side of Haven from 630 feet north of Wilson to Wilson; the parkway on the north side of Wilson from Haven to Mayberry; the parkway on the east side of Mayberry from Wilson to 382 feet north of Poplar, and the east and west side of Cartilla from Wilson to Poplar. Ground Cover area: 10,243 square feet Mulchscape area: 25,297 square feet A-27 The north side of 19th from Mayberry to 93 feet east of Castle Gate. Ground Cover area: 5,145 square feet Hardscape area: 2,870 square feet A-28 The east side of Hermosa from 360 feet south of Manzanita to Manzanita, and the south side of Manzanita from Hermosa to Raspberry. Ground Cover area: 7,421 square feet Hardscape area: 4,712 square feet A-29 The south side of Wilson from 240 feet west of Timbermist to Hermosa; the west side of Hermosa from Wilson to 213 feet south of Oak Grove. Ground Cover area: 11,184 square feet A-30 The equestrian trail and plant material from the curb to the tract wall on the west side of Hermosa from 118 feet south of Hillside to 160 feet south of Waterford. Ground Cover area: 12,132 square feet A-31 The south side of Lemon from London to Calle Hermosa. Ground Cover area: 4,404 square feet Hardscape area: 1,800 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P214 A-32 The north side of Lemon from the Alta Loma Channel to London; the east side of London from Lemon to Cypress. Ground Cover area: 4,463 square feet Hardscape area: 3,375 square feet A-33 The parkway on the east side of London from 158 feet north of Banyan to 310 feet north of Banyan. Ground Cover area: 1,029 square feet Hardscape area: 1,160 square feet A-34 The south side of Alta Loma Dr. from Mayberry to Revere. Ground Cover area: 2,772 square feet A-35 The west side of Hermosa from Lemon to 125 feet north of Highland, the parkway on the south side of Lemon from 621 feet west of Hermosa to Hermosa. Ground Cover area: 10,494 square feet Hardscape area: 9,207 square feet Mulchscape area: 2,370 square feet A-36 The south side of Lemon from 385 feet west of Mayberry to Cartilla. Ground Cover area: 4,850 square feet Hardscape area: 4,915 square feet A-37 The south side of Hillside north and south of the equestrian trail from Beryl to 203 feet east of Eastwood. Ground Cover area: 4,900 square feet A-38 The median in the 9200 block of Monte Vista. Ground Cover area: 500 square feet Hardscape area: 1,380 square feet A-39 The south side of Almond from Henry to Sapphire. The west side of Sapphire from Almond to 255 feet south of Bella Vista. Ground Cover area: 6,926 square feet A-40 The parkway on the east side of Jasper from Hunter to Highland. The parkway on the south side of Highland from Jasper to Carnelian. The west side of Carnelian from Highland to 210 feet south of Highland. Ground Cover area: 14,858 square feet Hardscape area: 6,040 square feet A-41 The west side of Sapphire from 236 feet north of Thoroughbred to Banyan. Ground Cover area: 1,784 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P215 Hardscape area: 812 square feet A-42 The parkway on the west side of Beryl from 132 feet north of Sunflower to Banyan. Ground Cover area: 4,735 square feet Hardscape area: 5,772 square feet A-43 The north side of Base Line from Topaz to the Cucamonga Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 4,563 square feet Hardscape area: 1,890 square feet A-44 The cutouts on the west side of Sapphire from Banyan to Marble. Ground Cover area: 7,300 square feet A-45 The mainline for this site was connected to A-46 9-8-99. A-46 The south side of Banyan from Northstar to Zircon. Ground Cover area: 7,448 square feet Hardscape area: 7,890 square feet A-47 The cutouts and vines on the north side of Banyan from 180 feet east of Zircon to 186 feet west of Vineyard. Ground Cover area: 1,300 square feet A-48 The parkway on the west side of Beryl from 452 feet north of Cielito; 158 feet south of Cielito and the easement between 9063 and 9073 Cielito from Cielito to 170 feet south of Cielito. Ground Cover area: 6,916 square feet Hardscape area: 2,440 square feet • A-49 The east side of Carnelian from 662 feet south of Banyan to Banyan; the south side of Banyan from Carnelian to Northstar. Ground Cover area: 5,906 square feet Hardscape area: 6,972 square feet A-50 The north side of Almond from Sapphire to Crest View; the east and west side of Skyline from Almond to 595 feet north of Almond. Ground Cover area: 17,600 square feet Hardscape area: 8,680 square feet A-51 The planter adjacent to the equestrian trail; from Haven to Riverwood, north of County flood retention basin, west of Chaffey College. The west side of Haven from 400 feet north of Amber to 270 feet south of Amber, and the north and south side of Amber from Haven to San Felipe. Ground Cover area: 37,977 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P216 Hardscape area: .5,458 square feet A-52 The east side of Riverwood, from 188 feet south of Charwood to 193 feet north of Charwood. Ground Cover area: 2,750 square feet • Hardscape area: 1,698 square feet A-53 The west side of Jasper from Hunter to Highland. The south side of Highland from Jasper to 308 feet west of Sard. The east and west side of Sard from Highland to Hunter. Ground Cover area: 7,445 square feet Hardscape area: 4,740 square feet A-54 The west side of Beryl from 233 feet north of Mignonette to Mignonette. Ground Cover area: 2,637 square feet Hardscape area: 932 square feet A-55 The north side of 19th from Cartilla to Mayberry. The east side of Mayberry from 19th to Heather. Ground Cover area: 8,410 square feet Hardscape area: 5,060 square feet A-56 The east side of Beryl from 410 feet north of Wilson to Wilson. The north side of Wilson from Beryl to 731 feet west of Buckthorn. The south side of Wilson from Buckthorn to Beryl. Ground Cover area: 19,708 square feet Hardscape area: 5,436 square feet A-57 The east side of Hermosa from 115 feet north of Coca to 451 feet north of Coca. The trail north of water retention basin from Hermosa to 619 feet east of Hermosa. Ground Cover area: 9,406 square feet Hardscape area: 6,794 square feet A-58 The west side of Haven from 510 feet south of Victoria to 1005 feet south of Victoria. Ground Cover area: 7,301 square feet Hardscape area: 4,790 square feet A-59 The east side of Archibald from 820 feet south of Lemon to 448 feet south of Lemon and continues from 275 feet south of Lemon to 185 south of Lemon. Ground Cover area: 4,777 square feet Hardscape area: 5,041 square feet A-60 The south side of Lemon from 290 feet east of Archibald to London. The west side of London from Lemon to Orange. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P217 Ground Cover area: 2,569 square feet Hardscape area: 4,122 square feet A-61 The north side of Carrari from London to Archibald. Ground Cover area: 25,152 square feet Hardscape area: 1,698 square feet A-62 The east side of Archibald from Carrari to 505 feet north of Meadowood. Ground Cover area: 8,626 square feet Hardscape area: 1,824 square feet A-63 The south side of Almond street from Carriage to Almond. Ground Cover area: 3,342 square feet . Hardscape area: 3,600 square feet A-64 The east side of Beryl from Cottonwood to Wilson. The south side of Wilson from. Beryl to 437 feet east of Beryl. The north side of Wilson from Cousins to 474 feet east of Cousins. Ground Cover area: 11,973 square feet Hardscape area: 9,949 square feet A-65 The east side of Archibald from La Gloria to 328 feet north of La Gloria. Ground Cover area: 2,279 square feet Hardscape area: 2,411 square feet A-66 The east side of Hermosa from Waterford to 500 feet north of Waterford. Ground Cover area: 4,695 square feet Hardscape area: 5,947 square feet • A-67 The south side of 19th from 220 feet east of Sapphire to Via Serena. Ground Cover area: 3,208 square feet Hardscape area: 4,158 square feet A-68 The west side of Haven from Hillside to 783 feet south of Hillside. Ground Cover area: 3,492 square feet A-69 The north side of Hillside from 27 feet west of Mayberry to 191 feet west of Mayberry. Ground Cover area: 1,002 square feet Hardscape area: 1,605 square feet A-70 The south side of 19th from 365 feet west of Amethyst to Amethyst. The west side of Amethyst from 19th to Hedges. Ground Cover area: 6,435 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P218 Hardscape area: 7,015 square feet A-71 The west side of Archibald from Hillside to Wilson. The north side of Wilson, south of the trail fence area from Archibald to 467 feet west of Archibald. Ground Cover area: 9,265 square feet Hardscape area: 2,609 square feet A-72 The south side of Banyan from 420 feet west of Archibald to Archibald. The west side of Archibald from Banyan to 389 feet south of Banyan. Ground Cover area: 10,270 square feet Hardscape area: 6,673 square feet A-73 The west side of Beryl St from 300 feet north of San Simeon Dr to 130 feet north of San Simeon Dr. Ground Cover area: 1,200 square feet Hardscape area: 600 square feet A-74 The south side of Highland Ave from Beryl St to Hellman Ave. Ground Cover area: 11,603 square feet A-75 The south side of Highland Ave from Amethyst St to 612 feet east of Archibald Ave. Ground Cover area: 106,409 square feet Hardscape area: . 60,608 square feet A-76 The west side of Archibald from 635 feet north of Hillside to Hillside. The north side of Hillside from Archibald to 770 feet west of Archibald. Ground Cover area: 8,859 square feet Hardscape area: 1,389 square feet A-77 The east side of Carnelian from Brilliant Ln to Wilson including the irrigation cut-outs along trail. The south side of Wilson from Carnelian to 745 feet east of Arabian Dr. The irrigation cut-outs on the north side of Wilson from Carnelian to 775 feet east of Arabian Dr. Ground Cover area: 5,101 square feet Hardscape area: 11,322 square feet B-1 The median on Blue Gum from Etiwanda to Blue Gum Court. Ground Cover are: 5,100 square feet B-2 The north side of Highland from the Deer Creek Channel to San Benito. The north side of 19th from San Benito to Palm. The west and east side of Alameda from 19th to Ring. The east side of Palm from 19th to Ring. Ground Cover area: 47,397 square feet Hardscape area: 26,285 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P219 B-3 The paseo from Sutter Ct to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 294 square feet Hardscape area: 400 square feet B-4 The north side of Banyan from Deer Creek Channel to 355 feet west of Fredericksburg. Ground Cover area: 9,200 square feet Hardscape area: 3,834 square feet B-5 The north side of Lemon from Semillion to 188 feet west of Terracina. Ground Cover area: 14,472 square feet Hardscape area: 3,894 square feet B-6 The north side of Lemon from Barsac to Semillion. Ground Cover area: 15,784 square feet Hardscape area: 3,780 square feet • B-7 The south side of Banyan from Cabernet to 414 feet east of Cabernet. Ground Cover area: 18,814 square feet B-8 The south side of Banyan from Callaway to Muscat. Ground Cover area: 10,505 square feet B-9 The east side of Haven from Banyan to 240 feet north of Banyan. The north side of Banyan from Haven to Merlot. Ground Cover area: 24,975 square feet Hardscape area: 1,356 square feet B-10 The east side of Haven from 400 feet south of Banyan to Banyan. The south side of Banyan from Haven to Callaway. Ground Cover area: 14,548 square feet Hardscape area: 6,348 square feet B-11 The south side of Banyan from Muscat to Cabernet. Ground Cover area: 33,282 square feet B-12 The north side of Lemon from Barsac to 135 feet east of Valinda. Ground Cover area: 13,464 square feet Hardscape area: 4,098 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P220 B-13 The south side of 19th from Inyo to 585 feet east of San Benito. The parkways on the east and west side of San Benito from 19th to San Mateo. The east side of Inyo from 19th to paseo south of 19th and the paseo running east from Inyo to Sonora. Ground Cover area: 17,563 square feet Turf area: 3,387 square feet Hardscape area: 14,192 square feet B-14 The paseo from San Benito and Sonora to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,000 square feet Hardscape area: 540 square feet B-15 The paseo from Stanislaus and Lavine to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 1,040 square feet Hardscape area: 428 square feet B-16 The paseo from Inyo to Mendocino. Ground Cover area: 225 square feet Hardscape area: 184 square feet B-17 The paseo from Yuba Ct to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 918 square feet Hardscape area: 420 square feet B-18 The south side of Wilson from 377 feet west of Canistel to 1032 feet east of Canistel. Ground Cover area: 6,762 square feet Hardscape area: 8,454 square feet B-19 The east side of Haven from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 341 feet south of Victoria. Ground Cover area: 6,415 square feet Hardscape area: 8,865 square feet B-20 The east side of Haven from 341 feet south of Victoria to Victoria; the south side of Victoria from Haven to 237 feet east of Mango. Ground Cover area: 16,900 square feet Hardscape area: 8,767 square feet B-21 The south side of 19th from Valinda to Inyo Ground Cover area: 3,900 square feet Hardscape area: 3,700 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P221 B-22 The south side of Lemon south of the sidewalk from 188 feet west of Terracina to 284 feet north of Marbella. The parkway on the south side of Lemon from 188 feet west of Terracina to 517 feet north of Marbella. The turf in the parkway at the end of the cul- de-sac on Sonterra Court. The parkway on the north side of Lemon from 188 feet west of Terracina to 526 feet south of Terracina. The north side of Lemon north of the sidewalk from 188 feet west of Terracina to 562 feet south of Terracina. The turf in the parkway at the end of the cul-de-sac at Serena Street. Ground Cover area: 17,688 square feet Turf area: 6,390 square feet Hardscape area: 4,928 square feet B-23 The parkway on the east side of Lemon from 129 feet south of Marbella to 526 feet south of Terracina. The slope on the east side of Lemon east of the sidewalk from 129 feet south of Marbella to 562 feet south of Terracina. The west side of Lemon west of the sidewalk from 284 feet north of Marbella to 129 feet south of Marbella. The parkway on the west side of Lemon from 517 feet north of Marbella to 129 feet south of Marbella. Ground Cover area: 22,531 square feet Hardscape area: 4,468 square feet B-24 The south side of Highland from 327 feet west of Deer Creek Channel to Deer Creek Channel. The paseo from Los Osos to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 4,946 square feet Hardscape area: 2,099 square feet B-25 The south side of Banyan from 152 feet west of Cantabria to 930 feet east of Cantabria. Ground Cover area: 16,693 square feet B-26 The north side of Wilson from 590 feet west of High Meadow Place to 187 feet east of High Meadow Place. Ground Cover area: 4,628 square feet Hardscape area: 390 square feet • B-27 The east side of Haven from 467 feet north of 19th St to 650 feet north of 19th St. Ground Cover area: 3,483 square feet Hardscape area: 6,235 square feet C-1 The north side of 26th from Andover to Hermosa. The east side of Hermosa from 26th to 331 feet north of Concord. Ground Cover area: 12,804 square feet Turf area: ' 9,423 square feet Hardscape area: 5,532 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P222 C-2 The entry monument on the northeast and northwest corners of 4th and Archibald. Ground Cover area: 6,337 square feet Hardscape area: 3,998 square feet C-3 The south side of Base Line from Ramona to 128 feet east of Cambridge. Ground Cover area: 17,262 square feet Hardscape area: 4,865 square feet C-4 The south side of Base Line from 440 feet west of Ramona to Ramona. Ground Cover area: 6,198 square feet Hardscape area: 2,200 square feet C-5 The south side of Base Line from 340 feet west of Center to 103 feet east of Center. Ground Cover area: 8,850 square feet Hardscape area: 2,215 square feet C-6 The south side of Base Line from Ivy to 105 feet west of Marine. Ground Cover area: 8,080 square feet Hardscape area: 2,475 square feet C-7 The parkway on the north side of Church from 142 feet east of Teak to 230 feet west of Teak. Ground Cover area: 1,813 square feet Hardscape area: 1,650 square feet C-8 The west side of Hermosa from 524 feet north of Palo Alto to 142 feet south of Palo Alto. Ground Cover area: 2,650 square feet Hardscape area: 3,996 square feet C-9 The parkway on the west side of Hermosa from 163 feet north of Ironwood to 145 feet south of Ironwood. Ground Cover area: 1,500 square feet Hardscape area: 1,848 square feet C-10 The entry monument parkway on the south side of Base Line from the western city limit to Alta Cuesta. Ground Cover area: 9,756 square feet Hardscape area: 4,380 square feet C-11 The parkway on the east side of Beryl from Alder to 135 feet north of Culpepper. Ground Cover area: 3,400 square feet Hardscape area: 3,600 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P223 C-12 The parkway on the east side of Hellman from Tryon to 665 feet north of Tryon. Ground Cover area: 8,280 square feet Hardscape area: 3,325 square feet C-13 The parkway on the west side of Hellman from 500 feet north of Church to Church. Ground Cover area: 2,416 square feet Hardscape area: 3,000 square feet C-14 The east side of Archibald from 196 feet north of Palo Alto to 530 feet north of Palo Alto. Ground Cover area: 4,262 square feet Hardscape area: 1,374 square feet C-15 The north side of San Bernardino from Summerlin to 225 feet west of Summerlin. Ground Cover area: 1,660 square feet Hardscape area: 710 square feet C-16 The south side of Base Line from 286 feet west of Hermosa to Hermosa. The raised planter on the southwest corner of Base Line and Hermosa. Ground Cover area: 4,190 square feet Hardscape area: 2,320 square feet C-17 The east side of Hellman from 775 feet south of 6th St to 6th St. The south side of 6th St from Hellman to Golden Oak Rd. The west side of Golden Oak Rd from 6th St to Foxbrook Dr. Ground Cover area: 9,058 square feet Hardscape area: 6,387 square feet D-1 The east side of Rochester from Church to Base Line. Ground Cover area: 11,126 square feet Turf area: 16,794 square feet Hardscape area: 17,301 square feet D-2 The east side of Rochester from 146 feet south of Chervil to Church St. Ground Cover area: 11,908 square feet Turf area: 9,950 square feet Hardscape area: 13,263 square feet D-3 The south side of Base Line from Rochester to 600 feet east of Rochester. Ground Cover area: 2,180 square feet Hardscape area: 4,121 square feet D-4 The north and south sides of Church St from Rochester to 150 feet east of Hyssop Dr. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P224 Ground Cover area: 6,340 square feet Hardscape area: 8,887 square feet H-9. The Haven median from the 210 freeway to Alta Loma. Ground Cover area: 2,207 square feet H-10 The Haven median from entrance of Haven Village to Amber Lane. Ground Cover area: 6,968 square feet Converted 5,131 sq ft of turf to ground cover effective 4/1/13. Area listed is the 50% maintained by LMD 1. An equal amount is maintained by General Fund. 3/25/13 H-11 The Haven median from Amber Lane to Olive Street. Ground Cover area: 5,026 square feet Converted 3,475 sq ft of turf to ground cover effective 4/1/13. Area listed is the 50% maintained by LMD 1. An equal amount is maintained by General Fund. 3/25/13 H-12 The Haven median from Olive Street to 712 feet north of Wilson. Ground Cover area: 6,734 square feet Converted 3,933 sq ft of turf to ground cover effective 4/1/13. Area listed is the 50% maintained by LMD 1. An equal amount is maintained by General Fund. 3/25/13 H-13 The Haven median from 19th St to the 210 freeway. Ground Cover area: 12,514 square feet FH-18 The Foothill median from East Avenue to 453 feet east of Cornwall Avenue. Ground Cover area: 5,450 square feet Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. • • Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 19 Fiscal Year 2015/16 91/S1OZ JeaA leDs!i P225 Oz eOuoweDnj oq uea}o Alit—j ON Pialsid aDueualu!ew adeDspue] --1r in T:2: --<;1( '� .. ` I E c iv:tuMWM m a J z ct •'8;oa ?i6 4 ' m d 01 a F, ? 8a*cta�Cr 'i ■ sa �•�sB I_!7o N ‘ II i I g—Ylogg3:1111§1i 6 \ %‘ O • II 53p,l8 2=0!EEg°It d II I•! 0 vgi;tagitY _iitt c pa=a $1,4z EP �1°• v:� 6 vE? 1 m ll;•iI;il•y-iie $: LIII aD L `i: s �_8a:sa;�r s o 0 LL a II AV pueHl3 NJ II H .0 i m II nV ePUeMg3 O I II Ile . II' U) fa. .n is sa oo ��IV Q V 1 4 b -4... Sl-1 II CD II AV ialsaLpoa V C II■ AC AE,, AV uaHilp I� =ny uaH�II�W W W _.._.._/~ .. ..-•�• _.._. II ii Q�� ; Pry °:• .� 0.1. W ■AV uaneH •••• , - nV uaneH CCI �j —" -11 II AV esow•H 114'fi nV esowiaH j ..- N w� �• .. 4. .., II •o nV ple44�IV I •. m ►- _ 6, I 4Ay p1egM»V J G •► a °�r A I., \\ Ill 1 4 ` . •,/r~ wII •AV ueaH AV uewpaH j a. S l �,,�-� a •� ny pieAawn '4\ 1S uegawe:)! .. . t I a E Q`` t._.t •f• L5, c o m LL<7 .L. . . •_1 J .5 rt U P226 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2015/16 Budget Personnel Services Regular Payroll $ 15,760.00 Part-time Salaries 00.00 Fringe Benefits 7.390.00 Subtotal Personnel $ 23,150.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $ 56,220.00 O & M Facilities 9,500.00 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 2,000.00 Emergency Equipment&Vehicle Rental 800.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 3,800.00 Depreciation of Computer Equipment 0.00 Contract Services 455,570.00 Contract Services/Facilities 2,000.00 Tree Maintenance 50,000.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 2,630.00 Water Utilities 393,650.00 Electric Utilities 74,430.00 Assessment Administration 65,870.00 General Overhead 60.020.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $ 1,176,490.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Outlay— Equipment $ 00.00 Capital Outlay—Vehicles 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $ 00.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 1,199,640.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 1,222,530.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 44.770.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 1,267,300.00 Less Operating Reserve Fund Contribution (67,660.00) Total Expenditure Budget $ 1,199,640.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 1,222,534.92 Total District EBU Count 13,258.16 Actual Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 92.21 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 92.21 Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 21 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P227 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2015 Reserve Fund Balance $ 484,708.00 Use of Operating Reserve Fund — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ - Operating Reserve Fund Contribution — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 67,660.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2016 Reserve Fund Balance $ 552,368.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 22 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P228 Utilities - Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. • Utilities - Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and , future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures Capital Proiects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 23 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P229 • METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D. all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIIID of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 24 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P23O In this Assessment District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the District and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the District. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the District which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the District and proximate to the improvements and within the Assessment District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 25 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P231 When the District was formed in 1979, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. Vacant parcels are assigned an EBU value of 0.25 per acre because they receive a lesser benefit from the improvements until such time as development occurs. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Benefit Unit Multi-Family Residential 0.50 Benefit Unit Non-Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type (County Use Maximum Allowable Actual Total Total Code) Assessment Rate Assessment Units/Acres EBUs per EBU Rate per EBU Single Family Residential $92.21 $92.21 8,145.00 8,145.00 Multi-Family Residential 92.21 92.21 10,191.00 5,095.50 Non-Residential 92.21 92.21 8.83 17.66 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 26 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P232 District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 27 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9T/STOZ aeaA leDslj P233 gZ eSuoweDn3 oyweu Jo A;!J—I 'oN pplslo a)ueualulelN adepspuei I+ w V ,.Lr u) H •r '„„. E CI cn J r Z 0 0 W 2 o V �'. C,, v RI a W o C c J o 0 CD w II ny/ wain CC '1%i:� J _ W` 1 lti t I I m 0 b u_ a i ` .._V) I ny Ise3 v- C� 3 Inv epuew ny epuennl13 J I ,: 1.11>las.0 step ny Jaasayoo� - ny iapayoob ny ua)lllliW r----......, ny uavgl!W Ay uaneH ny uaneH ny esowJaH ' ny esowiaH ny ple4!yoJy ny pie4lyoly ny uewllaH ny uewllaH L L Q ny pJeAauln kS uellaweo U :i'i'�Jffl•' Ay 9 i,$0 :ill c cc m n anOJ #. f �,ri � (0 0. 0-55 .'111=1`0 1 V CC c a °o a 1111"04 LL a) v c 1 91; at° ra co 11[111111:i! ca ft til � }+1,ais pit V 2id. idr:?ii P234 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2015/16 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Maximum Property Type Allowable Total Total Allowable (County Use Code) Assessment Rate Units/Acres EBUs Assessment per EBU Single Family $92.21 8,145.00 8,145.00 $751,050.45 Residential Multi-Family 92.21 10,191.00 5,095.50 469,856.05 Residential Non-Residential 92.21 8.83 17.66 1,628.42 TOTALS 18,344.83 13,258.16 $1,222,534.92 *"Actual Assessment Rate per EBU" is the same as "Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate Per EBU". A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following Annexation is effective for the 2015/16 Fiscal Year: APN Annexatio ' Project Total Total Property Type n Date Name Units/Acres EBUS 0207-201-01, 03/19/14 TR 18817 94.00 94.00 Single Family 21 & 44 Residential 0229-041-09 05/21/14 TR 18870-1 166.00 166.00 Single Family Residential 0209-122-01 08/06/14 PM 19505 2.00 2.00 Single Family Residential 0229-041-12 09/17/14 TR 18870 125.00 125.00 Single Family Residential 1074-281-09 10/01/14 DRC2013- 1.00 1.00 Single Family 01001 Residential Landscape Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 29 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P235 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2015/2016 City of Rancho Cucamonga Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2) P236 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2755 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member. Lynne B. Kennedy, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology Dean Rodia, Parks & Landscape Superintendent Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P237 TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Letter 1 Introduction 3 Reason for Assessment Process for Annual Assessment Plans and Specifications 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District Description of Improvements and Services Map of Improvements Estimate of Costs 22 District Budget Definitions of Budget Items Method of Assessment 25 General General Benefit Special Benefit Method of Assessment Spread Assessment Diagram 36 Assessment Roll 38 Assessment Roll Annexations P238 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 15, 2015 the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 15-119, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2) (hereafter, referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2015/16 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2015/16 Total Estimated Assessment $ 3,213,650.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 14,040.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 3,227,690.00 Plus Contribution from General Fund for General Benefit 328,570.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 90,960.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 3,647,220.00 Total District EBU Count 76,029.54 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 42.28 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $ 42.28 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 1 P239 parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirely of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefitted Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Annual Engineer's Report, Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. QQpFESSip/4, Quo KDNEW gr Fyn No,CO6367213 m) ar .p:63o-1 7 aF �� S7,-vCO' •,tee, `..�OFCA Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 2 P240 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 3 P241 written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, o opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold a community meeting with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If the is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 4 P242 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area located south of the 1-210 Freeway, west of Etiwanda Avenue, southwest of the 1-15 Freeway, and east of Haven Avenue, also known as the Victoria Planned Community, and are more particularly in the diagram of the District included herein. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements located in and serviced and maintained by the District generally include: the landscaping and associated landscape lighting and irrigation systems installed along the roadways, medians, and community trails; sidewalks; and 6 neighborhood parks that are of direct and special benefit to the parcels within the District. These improvements are located within the public rights-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris/graffiti, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements, including the parks and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of the improvement or facility; grading and replacement of trail surfacing; trail fence repair and replacement; and irrigation systems control, adjustment, repair and replacement. Servicing means the furnishing of water for the irrigation of landscaping, the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscaping or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include materials, vehicles, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Ellena Park, Kenyon Park, Victoria Arbors Park, Victoria Groves Park, Vintage Park, and Windrows Park Site# Descriptive Location 2-1 The west side of Arbor Lane from the traffic circle to Church. The Arbor Lane median from Church to the traffic circle. The east side of Arbor Lane from Long Meadow to Church. The paseo from the west side of Arbor Lane to Day Creek Blvd. The paseo from the west side of Arbor Lane to Saintsbury. The north side of Winery Drive from Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 5 P243 Arbor Lane to 214 feet west of Arbor Lane. The south side of Long Meadow Drive from Freestone Court to Duck Creek Place. Ground Cover area: 93,639 square feet Hardscape area: 59,041 square.feet 2-2 The northwest corner of Day Creek Blvd. and Church. The north side of Church from Day Creek Blvd. to 1,152 feet west of Hess. The paseo from the north side of Church to Dry Creek Drive. The paseo from the north side of Church to Pine Ridge PI. The west side of Hess Place from the north side of Church to Dry Creek Drive. The south side of Church from 145 feet east of Hyssop to 896 feet east of Hyssop. Ground Cover area: 24,018 square feet Hardscape area: 26,617 square feet 2-3 The west side of Day Creek from 250 feet north of Appellation to Church. The east side of Day Creek from Church to Madrigal. The Day Creek median from Church to Baseline. The south side of Madrigal from Day Creek to Roundhill. Ground Cover area: 35,420 square feet Hardscape area: 42,671 square feet 2-4 Victoria Park Lane from Baseline to the east entrance of Arbor Park. The southwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Baseline. The southeast corner of Victoria Park Lane to 445 feet east of Victoria Park Lane. Ground Cover area: 36,482 square feet Turf area: 3,874 square feet Hardscape area: 32,927 square feet 2-5 The east and west side of Victoria Park Lane and the medians from Mosaic Dr. to Church. Ground Cover area: 56,358 square feet • Hardscape area: 20,390 square feet 2-6 The north side of Church from Arbor Lane to Day Creek. The northwest corner of Church and Arbor Lane. The paseo from the north side of Church to Wilson Creek Dr. Ground Cover area: 21,616 square feet Hardscape area: 15,159 square feet 2-7 The north side of Church from Victoria Park Lane to Arbor Lane. The northwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Church. The paseo from the north side of Church to Elk Cove Court. The paseo from the north side of Church to Freestone Court. The northeast corner of Arbor Lane and Church. Ground Cover area: 16,609 square feet Hardscape area: 13,730 square feet Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 6 P244 2-8 The paseo from the west side of Etiwanda to Silver Rose Court. The north side of Church from Etiwanda to Victoria Park Lane. The east side of Iron Horse PI from Church to Wild Horse Way. The paseo from the north side of Church to Cloudy Bay Ct. The medians from Iron Horse PI to Etiwanda. Ground Cover area: 35,122 square feet Hardscape area: 28,473 square feet 2-9 The landscaped slope behind existing landscape of site 2-5 on the west side of Victoria Park Lane from 475 feet north of Long Meadow Dr. to Long Meadow Dr. The landscape slope and curb adjacent parkway from Victoria Park Lane to 685 feet west of Victoria Park Lane. Ground Cover area: 26,213 square feet Hardscape area: 5,617 square feet VW-1 Base Line median from Victoria Park Lane to 830 feet west of Victoria Park Lane. Ground Cover area: 4,514 square feet Hardscape area: 3,474 square feet VW-2 The north side of Baseline 300 feet east and 200 feet west of Swanson. The east and west sides of Swanson from Baseline to Province. The paseo from the intersection of Swanson and Province to Atwood with outlet to Dunmore. The paseo from Atwood to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The north side of Saratoga from Powell to Dunmore. The paseo from Saratoga to Etiwanda. The south side of Atwood from Victoria Park Lane to Travis. The north side of Atwood from Walcott to Victoria Park Lane. Ground Cover area: 18,753 square feet Turf area: 73,931 square feet Hardscape area: 22,615 square feet VW-3 The Victoria Park Lane median and the west and east side parkways from Baseline to the entrance to Victoria Village. Ground Cover area: 24,453 square feet Turf area: 2,637 square feet Hardscape area: 3,214 square feet VW-4 The Victoria Park Lane median and the west and east side parkways from Victoria Village entrance to Atwood. Ground Cover area: 30,695 square feet Turf area: 10,242 square feet Hardscape area: 6,428 square feet VW-5 The Victoria Park Lane median and the west side and east side parkways from Atwood to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 49,513 square feet Hardscape area: 5,467 square feet Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 7 P245 VW-6 The paseo running north from 12732 Farrington to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 285 square feet Hardscape area: 679 square feet VW-7 The paseo running north from 12840 Farrington to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 266 square feet Hardscape area: 552 square feet VW-8 The Victoria Park Lane median and the west side parkway from the Southern Pacific Railroad to South Victoria Windrows Loop. The Victoria Park Lane east side parkway from the Southern Pacific Railroad to Zinnia Ct. Ground Cover area: 40,548 square feet Hardscape area: 6,150 square feet VW-9 The Victoria Park Lane east side parkway from Barberry to North Victoria Windrows Loop at Windrows Park. Ground Cover area: 9,188 square feet Turf area: 3,851 square feet Hardscape area: 3,720 square feet VW-10 The west side of Victoria Park Lane from South Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct. The Victoria Park Lane median from Zinnia Ct. to Dahlia Ct. The east side of Victoria Park Lane from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Windrows Park to Dahlia CL Ground Cover area: 25,148 square feet Turf area: 37,350 square feet Hardscape area: 11,400 square feet VW-11 The east side parkway on South Victoria Windrows Loop from Silktassel to Victoria Park Lane. The parkway on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from the intersection of South Victoria Windrows Loop and North Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct. The Victoria Park Lane median from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct. The parkway on the north side of Victoria Windrows Loop from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct. Ground Cover area: 23,082 square feet Turf area: 24,187 square feet Hardscape area: 6,988 square feet VW-12 The Victoria Park Lane median from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to 390 feet east of Day Creek. The parkway on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to 390 feet east of Day Creek. The parkway on the west side of north Victoria Windrows Loop from Silverberry to Victoria Park Lane. The parkway on the south side of Silverberry from 390 feet east of Day Creek to North Victoria Windrows Loop. Ground Cover area: 149,010 square feet Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 8 P246 Turf area: 38,842 square feet Hardscape area: 12,868 square feet VW-13 The parkway on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from 390 feet east of Day Creek to South Victoria Windrows Loop. The west side of South Victoria Windrows Loop from Victoria Park Lane to Snapdragon. Ground Cover area: 20,068 square feet Turf area: 16,476 square feet Hardscape area: 7,200 square feet VW-14 The parkway on the west side of South Victoria Windrows Loop from Snapdragon to Victoria Park Lane. The parkway on the north and south side of Sugargum from South Victoria Windrows Loop to 390 feet east of Day Creek. The parkways on the east and west sides of Basswood from Sugargum to Blazing Star. The parkway on the north side of South Victoria Windrows Loop from Victoria Park Lane to Silktassel. Ground Cover area: 21,466 square feet Turf area: 10,335 square feet Hardscape area: 27,560 square feet VW-15 The parkway on the north side of Bougainvillea Way from Peach to North Victoria Windrows Loop. The parkway on the east side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Bougainvillea Way to Citrus. The parkway on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Locust and following that curb line to Silverberry. The parkway on the north side of Silverberry from North Victoria Windrows Loop 390 feet east of Day Creek. The paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Silverberry to Nasturtium. The paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Locust to Pistachio and continuing to Bougainvillea. Ground Cover area: 45,929 square feet Turf area: 12,207 square feet .Hardscape area: 23,630 square feet VW-16 The south side of Highland from 455 feet east of Day Creek to 534 feet east of Locust. The east and west side of Locust from Highland to North Victoria Windrows Loop. The parkway on the south side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Citrus east to Bougainvillea Ct. The parkway on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Twinspur to Locust. Ground Cover area: 26,577 square feet Turf area: 23,922 square feet Hardscape area: 19,203 square feet VW-17 This site was modified and added to VW-16, 1-5-99. VW-18 The south side of Highland from 12583 Highland to Rockrose. Ground Cover area: 2,800 square feet Turf area: 8,515 square feet Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 9 P247 Hardscape area: 3,325 square feet VW-19 The north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Rosemary to Rockrose. The east side of Rockrose from North Victoria Windrows Loop to Highland. The south side of Highland from Rockrose to Etiwanda. The horse trail from Highland and Etiwanda to the Fire Station. Ground Cover area: 21,027 square feet Turf area: 32,266 square feet Hardscape area: 11,298 square feet VW-20 The parkway on the south side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Victoria Park Lane to Plum. The parkway on the west side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Plum Way to Rosemary Ct. The paseo from Tipu PI. east to the open field. Note: The area in front of Windrows Park is watered by VW-20 water meter, but is maintained by City crews. Ground Cover area: 2,110 square feet Turf area: 16,411 square feet Hardscape area: 9,132 square feet VW-21 The east side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Rosemary Ct. to the trail south of Kalmia St. The trail and paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop south of Kalmia St. to Etiwanda Ave. and north to the Fire Station. The south side of Basil St. from North Victoria Windrows Loop to Santolina PI. Ground Cover area: 49,187 square feet Turf area: 57,532 square feet Hardscape area: 19,600 square feet VW-22 The paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Rockrose to the northeast corner of Windrows Park and from that corner to Plum. Ground Cover area: 13,689 square feet Turf area: 19,953 square feet Hardscape area: 9,489 square feet VW-23 The west side of Rockrose from Highland to North Victoria Windrows Loop. The parkway on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Rockrose to Twinspur. The parkway on the south side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Bougainvillea Ct to Rosemary. Ground Cover area: 18,299 square feet • Turf area: 3,452 square feet Hardscape area: 10,352 square feet VW-24 The M.W.D. easement from Jasmine and Ironbark to Sweet Gum Dr. Ground Cover area: 475 square feet Hardscape area: 4,730 square feet Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 10 P248 VW-25 The north side of Baseline from 384 feet west of Wanona to Etiwanda. The west side of Etiwanda from Baseline to Craig. The Baseline median from Swanson PI to Etiwanda. Ground Cover area: 20,934 square feet Turf area: 3,079 square feet Hardscape area: 12,799 square feet VW-26 The paseo from Grape to 630 feet west of Grape. Ground Cover area: 7,021 square feet Hardscape area: 8,548 square feet VW-27 The south side of Baseline from 251 feet west of Swanson to Etiwanda. The Baseline median from Victoria Park Lane to Swanson Place. Ground Cover area: 18,816 square feet Hardscape area: 17,233 square feet • VG-1 The turf and ground cover on the south side of Highland from the Deer Creek Channel to Fairmont. The turf and ground cover from Highland on the west side of Fairmont to Victoria Park Lane. The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Lane south of the horse trail from 475 feet east of Milliken to Fairmont. The turf on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from 275 feet east of Milliken to Fairmont. The turf in the parkway on the east side of Fairmont from Victoria Park Lane to Highland. Ground Cover area: 21,573 square feet Turf area: 47,604 square feet Hardscape area: 17,300 square feet VG-2 The turf on the east side of York from Delaware to Fairmont. The ground cover on the south side of Fairmont from York Place and continuing on that curb line to Victoria Park Lane. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane west of Milliken from Fairmont to Milliken. The parkway on the west side of Milliken from Victoria Park Lane to Fairmont. The Milliken median from Fairmont to Victoria Park Lane. The turf on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from 273 feet west of Milliken to Milliken. The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Lane south of the horse trail from 468 feet west of Milliken to Milliken. Ground Cover area: 29,395 square feet Turf area: 73,608 square feet Hardscape area: 20,173 square feet VG-3 The turf and ground cover north of the sidewalk on the north side of Fairmont from Nova Ct. continuing on that curb line to York PI. and the turf south of the sidewalk on the north side of Fairmont from Armstrong Pl. continuing on that curb line to York PI. The ground cover on the west side of York PI. from Fairmont to Delaware and the ground cover on the east side of York PI. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Fairmont from Emerson continuing along that curb line to Armstrong PI. The turf and ground cover on the east and west sides of Biola PI. Ground Cover area: 57,189 square feet Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 11 P249 Turf area: 38,343 square feet Hardscape area: 26,848 square feet VG-4 The turf and ground cover on the south side of Fairmont from Armstrong to Milliken. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Milliken from Fairmont to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The Milliken median from Fairmont to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The ground cover on the north side of the Southern Pacific Railroad from Deer Creek Channel to Rochester including the paseo to Baylor. The ground cover on the north side of Fairmont from Milliken to Nova Ct. The turf on the north side of Fairmont from Milliken to Armstrong. Ground Cover area: 197,763 square feet Turf area: 24,151 square feet Hardscape area: 12,278 square feet VG-5 The paseo from Biola to Amarillo to Delaware at York. Ground Cover area: 12,448 square feet Turf area: 44,896 square feet Hardscape area: 7,992 square feet VG-6 The paseo beginning at the northeast corner of Victoria Groves Park and Fairmont and extending to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 73,442 square feet Turf area: 74,778 square feet Hardscape area: 16,629 square feet VG-7 The paseo that begins on the south side of Donnelly at Fairmont and continues to the Deer Creek Channel including the southward extension on the west side of Albright from Donnelly to Pacific and the paseo from Pacific to Charleston. Ground Cover area: 43,427 square feet Turf area: 51,765 square feet Hardscape area: 15,806 square feet VG-8 The ground cover on the west side of Milliken from 566 feet north of Victoria Park Lane to Victoria Park Lane. The ground cover and turf north of the horse trail on Victoria Park Lane from Milliken to Fairmont. The ground cover on the east side of Fairmont from Victoria Park Lane to 156 feet north of Victoria Park Lane. Ground Cover area: 21,614 square feet Turf area: 8,614 square feet Hardscape area: 8,281 square feet VG-9 The ground cover on the east side of Fairmont from 156 feet north of Victoria Park Lane to Kenyon Way. The ground cover on the south side of Kenyon from Fairmont to 197 feet east of Fairmont. The turf on the south side of Kenyon from Fairmont to 316 feet east of Fairmont. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Baltimore Dr from Fairmont to Baltimore CL The turf and ground cover on the north side of Baltimore Dr. from Fairmont to Vanderbilt. The turf and ground cover on the east side Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 12 P250 of Vanderbilt from Baltimore to Brown. The paseo from Vanderbilt and Brown to Kenyon. Ground Cover area: 48,481 square feet Turf area: 11,357 square feet Hardscape area: 13,542 square feet VG-10 The ground cover on the south side of Kenyon from 197 feet east of Fairmont to Milliken. The turf on the south side of Kenyon from 316 feet east of Fairmont to Milliken. The ground cover on the west side of Milliken from Kenyon to 566 feet north of Victoria Park Lane. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Capitol from Brown to Bethany. The paseo from Capitol and Brown to Kenyon. Ground cover area: 34,241 square feet Turf area: 11,031 square feet Hardscape area: 5,320 square feet VG-11 The east and west side parkways and median of Milliken from Baseline to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The north side of Baseline from 542 feet east of Milliken to Milliken. Ground Cover area: 31,367 square feet Turf area: 17,264 square feet Hardscape area: 25,524 square feet VG-12 The turf and ground cover on the south side of Fairmont from the southeast corner of Milliken and Fairmont along the curb line to Victoria Park Lane. The turf and ground over on the west side of Fairmont from the southwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Fairmont (located east of Milliken) and continuing along the curb line to Milliken. The turf on the east side of Milliken from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 730 feet south of Victoria Park Lane. The ground cover on the east side of Milliken from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 766 feet south of Victoria Park Lane. Ground Cover area: 53,068 square feet Turf area: 36,431 square feet Hardscape area: 27,004 square feet VG-13 The paseos from Victoria Park Lane to Verona, Verona to Napoli, and Genova to Tivoli. Ground Cover area: 17,993 square feet Turf area: 16,344 square feet Hardscape area: 8,376 square feet VG-14 The Baseline median from Milliken to Ellena East. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Baseline from Ellena East to Ellena West. The turf and ground cover on the east side of Ellena West from Baseline and following the curb line to Kenyon. The north side of Ellena West from Kenyon to Casoli. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Casoli from Ellena West to Candela. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Crema Place from Ellena west to Candela. Ground Cover area: 89,456 square feet Turf area: 62,999 square feet Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 13 P251 Hardscape area: 44,826 square feet VG-15 The turf and ground cover on the west side of Rochester from the Southern Pacific Railroad to Baseline. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Baseline from Rochester to Ellena East. The Baseline Median from Rochester to Ellena East. The turf and ground cover on the east side of Ellena east from Baseline and continuing along that curb line to 275 feet north of Berra Road. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Berra from Ellena East to Comiso. Ground Cover area: 58,588 square feet Turf area: 57,306 square feet Hardscape area: 36,014 square feet VG-16 The paseo from Baseline to Ellena West with entrances to Amelia and Payola. Ground Cover area: 9,661 square feet Turf area: 11,529 square feet Hardscape area: 5,804 square feet VG-17 The paseo from Fairmont to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The paseo from Fabriano to Martano. Ground Cover area: 35,351 square feet Turf area: 40,291 square feet Hardscape area: 16,394 square feet VG-18 The paseo from Rapallo to Gandino and south to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 4,281 square feet Hardscape area: ,1,308 square feet VG-19 The paseo from Tolentino to Pizolli and to Tolentino. Ground Cover area: 12,555 square feet Turf area: 17,856 square feet Hardscape area: 7,380 square feet VG-20 The turf on the east side of Milliken from 730 feet south of Victoria Park Lane to Victoria Park Lane. The ground cover on the east side of Milliken from 766 feet south of Victoria Park Lane to Victoria Park Lane. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from the southeast corner at Milliken heading east to Fairmont. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from Parma to the northeast corner of Milliken and Victoria Park Lane. The ground cover on the west side of Parma from Victoria Park Lane to Lomello. The Victoria Park Lane median from Milliken to Pandino Ct. The Milliken median from Victoria Park Lane to 440 feet south of Kenyon. The parkway on the west side of Milliken from 420 feet south of Kenyon to Victoria Park Lane. Ground Cover area: 76,232 square feet Turf area: 97,979 square feet Hardscape area: 22,177 square feet Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 14 • P252 VG-21 The ground cover on the east side of Parma from Victoria Park Lane to Lomello. The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from Parma to 653 feet east of Kenyon. The turf on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from Parma to 547 feet east of Kenyon. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from Fairmont to 422 feet east of Kenyon. The turf and ground cover on the east and west sides of Kenyon from Victoria Park Lane to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The paseo from Kenyon to Rapallo. The paseo from Kenyon to Bari. The Victoria Park Lane median from Pandino Ct to Portofino Ct. Ground Cover area: 69,167 square feet Turf area: 58,692 square feet Hardscape area: 34,478 square feet VG-22 The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from 653 feet east of Kenyon to Rochester. The turf on the north side of Victoria Park Lane from 547 feet east•of Kenyon to Rochester. The Victoria Park Lane median from Portofino Ct to Rochester Ave. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane north of the sidewalk from Kenyon to the east side of Vintage Park. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Lane from the east side of Vintage Park to Rochester. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Rochester from Victoria Park Lane to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 83,397 square feet Turf area: 89,674 square feet Hardscape area: 20,863 square feet VG-23 The turf and ground cover on the east side of Kenyon from Victoria Park Lane to 409 feet west of Grimaldi. The ground cover on the south side of Portofino from Kenyon to Bergano. The turf and ground cover on the north and south side of Lark from Kenyon to the west property line of Rancho Cucamonga High School. The ground cover on the east and west side of Matera from Lark to Pescara. The ground cover on the north and south side of Grimaldi from Kenyon to Brindisi. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Kenyon from Lark to Victoria Park Lane. The ground cover on the north and south side of Marcello from Kenyon to Landriano. The paseo from southwest corner of Kenyon Park to Kenyon. Ground Cover area: 63,733 square feet Turf area: 82,565 square feet Hardscape area: 39,297 square feet VG-24 The north side of Kenyon from Autumn Glen court to Woodruff. The east side of Woodruff from Kenyon to 403 feet north of Kenyon. Ground Cover area: 8,477 square feet Turf area: 5,320 square feet Hardscape area: 5,622 square feet VG-25 The paseo west of Torino from Kenyon to Highland. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Highland from the northwest corner of Tract 13440 to the east end of Tract 13440. Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 15 P253 Ground Cover area: 40,800 square feet Turf area: 24,134 square feet Hardscape area: 14,353 square feet VG-26 The paseo from Brindisi Ct. to Messina. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Brindisi Ct. to the end of the cul-de-sac. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Messina from the paseo to Treviso Way. Ground Cover area: 18,905 square feet Turf area: 1,141 square feet Hardscape area: 3,615square feet VG-27 The Milliken median from 440 feet south of Kenyon to Highland. The parkway on the west side of Milliken from 420 feet south of Kenyon. Ground Cover area: 4,030 square feet Turf area: 3,006 square feet Hardscape area: 4,222 square feet VG-28 The east side of Rochester from Victoria Park Lane to Highland. Ground Cover area: 60,902 square feet Hardscape area: 5,593 square feet VG-29 The north side of Kenyon from Milliken to Fairmont. The groundcover on the east side of Fairmont, east of the sidewalk, from Kenyon to the 210 freeway. Ground Cover area: 20,178 square feet Turf area: 16,877 square feet Hardscape area: 5,736 square feet VG-30 The south side of Tresenda from Santo to Sapada. The paseo from Sapada to Carano. The south side of Montella from Carano to Trivento. Ground Cover area: 6,797 square feet Turf area: 2,462 square feet Hardscape area: 4,860 square feet VG-31 The east side of Brienza from Larina to Letini. The west side of Tindari from Letini to Larina. The Greenbelt on the south side of Marconi from Trivento to Comisco. The east side of Comisco from Scalea to Santo. Ground Cover area: 23,419 square feet Turf area: 18,351 square feet Hardscape area: 13,764 square feet VG-32 The north side of Candela from Terini to Bettoloa. Ground Cover area: 20,172 square feet Turf area: 8,190 square feet Hardscape area: 8,292 square feet Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 16 P254 VG-33 The paseo at the north end of Sapri to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 894 square feet Hardscape area: 318 square feet VG-34 The paseo at the north end of Bronte to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 894 square feet Hardscape area: 318 square feet VG-35 The east side of Rochester from 555 feet south of Palmi to Victoria Park Lane. The south side of Victoria Park Lane and median from Rochester to east side of Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 53,646 square feet Turf area: 11,150 square feet Hardscape area: 17,555 square feet VG-36 The north side of Victoria Park Lane from the east side of Deer Creek Channel to Rochester. Ground Cover area: 55,780 square feet Turf area: 10,500 square feet Hardscape area: 8,004 square feet VG-37 The paseo at the end of Ardmoor Ct. to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 1,350 square feet • Hardscape area: 950 square feet VG-38 The east side of Milliken from 106 feet north of Victoria Park Lane to Kenyon. The north and south side of Spring Mist Drive from Milliken to Summerstone. The south side of Kenyon from Milliken to Kenyon Park. Ground Cover area: 28,051 square feet Turf area: 4,533 square feet Hardscape area: 12,879 square feet VG-39 The north side of Victoria Park Lane from Kenyon paseo to 132 feet east of Milliken. The Kenyon paseo from Victoria Park Lane to Fairwinds Court. The paseo from Victoria Park Lane to the south west corner of Kenyon Park. Ground Cover area: 55,089 square feet • Turf area: 13,120 square feet Hardscape area: 7,676 square feet VG-40 The south side of Highland from 413 feet west of Highland paseo to Highland paseo. The east side of Highland paseo from Highland to Kenyon. The north side of Kenyon from Highland paseo to Autumn Glen Court. Ground Cover area: 56,553 square feet Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 17 P255 Hardscape area: 12,314 square feet VG-41 The west side of Rochester from 294 feet south of Highland to Lark. The north side of Lark from Rochester to 1230 feet west of Rochester. Ground Cover area: 31,413 square feet Hardscape area: 13,338 square feet VG-42 The south side of Highland from 1314 feet west of Rochester to Rochester. The west side of Rochester from Highland to 294 feet south of Highland. The north side of Highland from Rochester to Woodruff. Ground Cover area: 40,346 square feet Hardscape area: 15,445 square feet VG-43 The north side of Victoria Park Lane and the median from Day Creek Blvd. to Day Creek Channel. The east and west side of Kensington PI. from Victoria Park Lane to Stratford Dr. Ground Cover are: 70,669 square feet Turf area: 7,888 square feet Hardscape area: 18,426 square feet VG-44 The west side of Day Creek Blvd. from 572 feet north of Silverberry to Day Creek Blvd. The south side of Silverberry from Kensington to Day Creek Blvd. Ground Cover area: 36,835 square feet Hardscape area: 24,376 square feet VG-45 The west side of Milliken and the Milliken median from the 210 freeway to Kenyon. Ground Cover area: 10,658 square feet Turf area: 610 square feet Hardscape area: 5,589 square feet VG-46 The Baseline median from 657 feet east of Virginia Dr. to •Rochester. The north side of Baseline from 278 feet east of Virginia to Rochester. The paseo from the northeast corner of Rochester and Base Line to Huntley. The east side of Rochester from Baseline to 105 feet north of Shenandoah. Ground Cover area: 33,135 square feet Hardscape area: 19,340 square feet VG-47 The north side of Baseline from 400 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. to Day Creek Blvd. Baseline median from Day Creek Blvd. to 595 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. Ground Cover area: 9,515 square feet Hardscape area: 7,926 square feet VG-48 The east side of Day Creek Blvd. and median from Baseline to Victoria Park Lane. The south side of Victoria Park Lane from Day Creek Blvd. to 390 feet east of Day Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 18 P256 Creek Blvd. Ground Cover area: 50,318 square feet Turf area: 3,234 square feet Hardscape area: 29,217 square feet VG-49 The north side of Victoria Park Lane and median from 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd to Day Creek Blvd. The east side of Day Creek Blvd from Victoria Park Lane to Highland. The south side of Highland from Day Creek Blvd. to 440 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. Ground Cover area: 51,459 square feet Turf area: 3,930 square feet Hardscape area: 32,296 square feet VG-50 The west side of San Carmela from 389 feet north of Baseline to Baseline. The north side of Baseline from Carmela to 264 feet west of Durness. Ground Cover area: 18,043 square feet Hardscape area: 12,383 square feet VG-51 The Paseo south of Saxon to Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 1,398 square feet Hardscape area: 969 square feet VG-52 The north side of Sugar Gum from Milliken to Kensington. The south side of Sugar Gum from Milliken to 111 feet east of Suffolk. Ground Cover area: 4,362 square feet Hardscape area: 3,325 square feet VG-53 The south side of Victoria Park Lane from 296 feet west of Kensington to Milliken. The west side of Day Creek Blvd. from Victoria Park Lane to 397 feet south of Sugar Gum. Ground Cover area: 28,532 square feet Turf area: 11,070 square feet Hardscape are: 7,720 square feet VG-54 The east side of Rochester from Shenandoah to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 6,864 square feet Hardscape area: 5,136 square feet VG-55 The paseo north of Westhaven to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 1,775 square feet Hardscape area: 2,575 square feet VG-56 The south side of Highland from 1,317 feet west of Day Creek to 1,085 feet west of Day Creek including the non-irrigated slope on the south side of the sidewalk. Ground Cover area: 5,274 square feet Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 19 P257 Hardscape area: 1,761 square feet VG-57 The north side of Highland from Fairmont Way to the Day Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 16,157 square feet Hardscape area: 17,405 square feet Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Map of Improvements The following page shows the approximate location (for reference only — may not include all) of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites, and parks and community trails to be maintained by the District. Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 20 P258 �...2 1.... E 0 0, Q u UN fn l__3'+"t} O lY 11111 �yy MI: to I- w , sr=..�; I 1 v a¢ _I N� r AVVGNVM113 sx ...11,).--,'--•-•-,mi • 0 WM •---4—LI lb- ''' ,-- ' ' AH NOi 'Ys-'\ nnii _ • r " a_ 0 nom �j �O 4 10 s �7~ N s 1 leo N� o - . S (r) m FP im "'"Z r O iv, o o} O w •4`�� `- 4 Nl SN3021V9 VIN !O A Q o •. p 111,0thtnr c: R1WI T ET 4 , �_ \,�, a ye'+ jJ u> _ tub C< s1 N C9 ° 0 4O _ o 1I > > .,� • N N Z a l8 N33210 AVON vF O j N t Q 1.-. o i in —_, tL o 1` ao to ti :mitt :: ?} mix o > o 0 ZQ , " • o � ra.a ∎ Ab 2131S3NOO2i m Q Q d'1 r O Z o N �. ;,r„ , J .�/h _ >i QI co I 1 �l�'7,+ "1'T'r ,f ^ D m 2 a g=- c V Z 0_ f_'1 > C7 ►iii _ _ c 1 c n?N c c-°- 1 i to > > : •• I ill° o a�. - u w 1 " , - ',• Pi,,,, �^E1`c•°4act y1UV 4 c > -e 041 • -(: `��l,, _"mo t 'oG'c°am @Lm�`of N ..i ■�� ,� rI/1'/ r.,y co m� c `oor8O•- ry Q O (3 O,0 V� 1,1, i > C9 11,1, suc. °y r� "_ o fly p > ,.. }r > t (i >. c m t a,v V▪ fA > M 0 > J:" �• a,� e 3 E a m c. o O N M Or N O > in- �rA rtt�I�, o°°Uw Eoc U=L�c in N Q. � • LLJ 4.. V 3N1llIW O I.ain T O n • 10.; I > _ ;l .. > !t > fi < > i m te 1 r& t a -L;im$ I m{ N O> u o Z O l O> O J1m Z/, o 0C IV 1i I .. - ' I.° Q r, Il Il " z 0 - a Si 1`k\-- > O W- Q ti 0 I > Z .� v --11111I1I1 11 111 fir him ,,,,, I I 13 CU pull Wu lull 1 �I 0,,ttH1+4 • fr•a : C a - vl nor" ( I OF t/ Cywr - y E m m •- •t0 _e. III 'Ofaai n 1T% a71 a' °? r`- fi _ tD I u :L LQ- y ut to 1 15 •y 2 X . I-I,. N c 2 3 c a w >■ ,C "1 =. r1 ■ J N ,_ - tC u Vl T V!4. to �� n111•i IU110/b'144114 } rn c rn c Y 5Z at 7-1, j ., mo iw/tful rt.Hlpr 31 2, : 44„...W4',,. , _ - U a a - ii. a 7 i •.R \111 mor vs 11111 \IU ♦,�ilt0nt, `ar.•`•. •• a� 101111 SL• M=U111 t 1ilry�,>�a,,l�tnt t. � [ �tt011���. � ® O W _-. 1 �tiO1111=A f C1t11 C Ilk/4 /1 1 �- d P259 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2015/16 Budget Personnel Services Regular Payroll $ 510,330.00 Overtime Salaries 1,090.00 Part-time Salaries 80,320.00 Fringe Benefits 249,370.00 Subtotal Personnel $ 841,110.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $ 67,150.00 O&M/Facilities 0.00 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 5,000.00 Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental 0.00 Contract Services 1,051,890.00 Contract Services/Facilities 0.00 Tree Maintenance 130,560.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 1,690.00 Water Utilities 1,118,660.00 Electric Utilities 108,270.00 Assessment Administration 34,870.00 Admin/General Overhead 223,250.00 Interfund Allocation 75,020.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $ 2,816,360.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Outlay —Vehicles $ 0.00 Transfer Out-Reserves 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $ 0.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 3,657,470.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 3,213,650.00 Plus Contribution from General Fund for General Benefit 328,570.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 90.960.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 3,633,180.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 14,040.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 3,647,220.00 Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 22 P260 Total Estimated Assessment $ 3,213,658.08 Total District EBU Count 76,029.54 Actual Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 42.00 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 42.28' Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per Benefit Unit ("BU") will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be the same or lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum after the application of the cost of living inflator, as defined in this report, unless the excess increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Assessment Law. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2015 Reserve Fund Balance $ 2,309,950.00 Operating Reserve Contribution — Fiscal Year 2015/16 (90,960.00) Operating Reserve Collection — Fiscal Year 2015/16 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2016 Reserve Fund Balance $ 2,218,990.00 • Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 23 P261 Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities - Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities - Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of • the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 24 P262 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Introduction Pursuant to the 1972 Act, Article XIIID of the California Constitution, and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act, all parcels that receive a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, permits the establishment of assessment districts by local agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22574). Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIIID also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Examples of parcels exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of- ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. Furthermore, Proposition 218 requires the City to separate general benefits from special benefits, whereas only special benefits may be assessed. As further detailed in the following sections, the Method of Assessment uses the following components to assign special benefit to each parcel: • Benefit Points: Assignment of points for aesthetic, safety and economic special benefits. • Benefit Factor: Multiplier. For residential parcels the benefit factor is units, and for non- residential parcels the benefit factor is lot size (acreage). Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 25 P263 • Benefit Units: Sum of a parcel's benefit points multiplied by the parcel's benefit factor. The total amount is the special benefit units assigned to a parcel. Apportioning of Special Benefit As previously outlined, each of the parcels within the District receives a special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services provided is identified and the proportionate special benefits derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. The total costs of maintenance and operation, less the amount of general benefits identified, will be assessed to the parcels within the District based on the estimated benefit units assigned to each parcel. To assess special benefits appropriately, it is necessary to relate parcels of different land uses and development status to each other. The benefit unit method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment since there is a total of 5,843 single family parcels within the District which represents 90.96% of the total assessable parcels within the District. The following shows how each parcel's benefit units have been determined. Aesthetic Benefit Points Aesthetic Benefit Points are assigned based upon the property's proximity to the improvements as well as the property's existing land use. All Single Family Residential parcels are located within the same proximity to the collective improvements (sidewalks, community trails, street landscaping and one-half mile from one of the parks). Each Single Family Residential parcel is fronted by sidewalk improvements, is within a one-half mile from one of the neighborhood parks, and uses the roads with street landscaping to enter and exit the Victoria Planned Community. In addition, the community trails are located throughout the District and serve as connectors between the different neighborhoods, school and shopping locations. All properties are within similar proximity to the trail improvements. Many trails are located along the sidewalks and streets, and all properties within the District have access to the trails through the various access points located throughout the entire District. The Single Family Residential parcels within the District are relatively similar in both building size and lot size. Since the improvements are provided uniformly throughout the District, Single Family Residential parcels are assigned 4.00 aesthetic benefit points, one for each of the improvement types. Multi Family and Condominium parcels are within close proximity to the sidewalks, and receive the benefit of having maintained sidewalks for users to travel and access the property. Although these parcels benefit from the aesthetics of the sidewalks they do not receive the same benefit as Single Family Residential parcels, since Multi Family and Condominium parcels do not have continuous sidewalk improvements along the frontage of each parcel/unit. Multi Family and Condominium parcels are within a one-half mile of the neighborhood parks, use the roads with street landscaping to enter and exit their housing complexes within the District, and are in close proximity to the trail improvements. Accounting for the lower average household size of Multi Family and Condominium parcels, and not having continuous sidewalk improvements directly fronting their property/unit, these properties have a reduced level of benefit from the improvements. Multi Family and Condominium parcels are assigned 2.80 benefit points. Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 26 P264 • Maintained sidewalks and street landscaping create an aesthetically pleasing environment for both employees and patrons of commercial properties. The overall aesthetics, interest and desirability of commercial properties within the District increase, as a result of the maintenance and servicing of the collective improvements. Based on the City's Land Use Plan and residential designations of homes within the District, there is an average of six Single Family Residential properties per acre within the District (General Plan, 2010). However, given the nature of their property use type, Commercial properties do not receive the same level of benefit from the trail and park improvements in relationship to residential land uses. Commercial properties are assigned 16.00 benefit points. A handful of parcels within the District are used to provide public services (such as fire stations, schools, churches and other similar uses) to the surrounding community, and are located based upon their proximity to the parcels they serve. These parcels benefit from the collective improvements in place, but at a reduced level compared to a Single Family Residential parcel, due to the nature of the improvements and their land use. In addition, these public service parcels are in place for the surrounding community, and the existence of well-maintained parks, street landscaping and community trails is not a significant factor in the decision to locate those facilities. Given the nature of their property use types, these public service parcels are assigned a 1.00 benefit points in recognition of the limited benefit they receive from the improvements maintained by the District. Undeveloped parcels within the District receive an aesthetic benefit from the maintenance of the collective improvements, but given the very limited activity and pedestrian access that these properties provide, properties within this land use category receive a reduced level of benefit. To account for this reduced benefit, all undeveloped properties are assigned 0.40 benefit points. Common area, roads and easements are deemed to receive no benefit from the District maintenance activities because they serve as connectors for other properties and do not receive benefit from the increased aesthetics. Utility parcels are located based on their proximity to the parcels they serve, and based upon their property usage (wireless towers, flood control basins and fire trail/access roads) do not benefit from the increased aesthetics. The following shows the aesthetic benefit points assigned to the parcel land use categories within the District: Parcel Land Use Category Aesthetic Benefit Points Single Family Residential 4.00 Condominium Residential 2.80 Multi-Family Residential 2.80 Commercial/Industrial 16.00 Public Service Parcels— Church/Fire 1.00 Station/School Undeveloped 0.40 Common Area/Roads/Easements/Utility 0.00 Safety Benefit Points Safety Benefit Points are assigned based upon the property's proximity to the improvements as well as the property's existing land use. The Single Family Residential parcels within the District Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 27 P265 are relatively similar in both building size and lot size. Since the sidewalks, trails and street landscaping improvements are provided uniformly throughout the District, Single Family Residential parcels are assigned 3.00 safety benefit points, one for each of the improvement types. Based on the additional pedestrian traffic that commercial property generates compared to residential property, and that there is an average of six Single Family Residential Properties per acre within the District, Commercial parcels are assigned 18.00 benefit points. Multi Family and Condominium parcels are within close proximity to the sidewalks, and receive the benefit of having maintained sidewalks, trails and street landscaping for users to travel and access the property. Multi Family and Condominium parcels receive a reduced level of benefit from the safety of the sidewalks as they do not receive the same benefit as parcels that have continuous sidewalk improvements along the entire frontage of their parcel/unit. In addition, Multi Family and Condominium parcels have a lower average household size, which results in a reduced volume of pedestrian traffic on the sidewalks and trails compared to a Single Family Residential parcel. Multi Family and Condominium parcels are assigned 2.10 benefit points. A handful of parcels within the District are used to provide public services (such as fire stations, schools, churches and other similar uses) to the surrounding community, and are located based upon their proximity to the parcels they serve. However, based on the nature and location of the sidewalk and street landscaping improvements and public access to these properties, these parcels receive a safety benefit from the maintenance of the improvements. These public service parcels are assigned 2.00 benefit points in recognition of the benefit they receive. Well maintained green areas reduce the occurrence of crime and vandalism, and as such the maintenance of the improvements within the District create a safety benefit for the undeveloped parcels within the District. However, the safety benefit is reduced compared to a Single Family Residential parcels due to the very limited activity and pedestrian access that these properties provide. Undeveloped properties are assigned 0.30 benefit points. Common area, roads and easements are deemed to receive no benefit from the District maintenance activities because they serve as connectors for other properties and do not receive benefit from the increased aesthetics. Utility parcels are located based on their proximity to the parcels they serve, and given the nature of the property usage ((wireless towers, flood control basins and fire trail/access roads) do not benefit from the increased safety. The following shows the safety benefit points assigned to the parcel land use categories within the District: Parcel Land Use Category Safety Benefit Points Single Family Residential 3.00 Condominium Residential 2.10 Multi-Family Residential 2.10 Commercial/Industrial 18.00 Public Service Parcels —Church/Fire Station/School 2.00 Undeveloped 0.30 Common Area/Roads/Easements/Utility 0.00 Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 28 P266 Economic Benefit Points Accounting for the existing economic activity throughout the District, as well as the potential for properties to develop, redevelop and invest in their economic presence, properties within the District are assigned benefit points for the economic activity benefits received from the uniform and maintained improvements. Economic activity benefit points are assigned based upon the property's location to the District activities, as well as the property's existing land use. The District's improvements will allow properties to maximize their development, land use and occupancy rates. Residential land uses are assigned benefit points in proportion to the number of trips generated and average number of occupants per dwelling unit in comparison to the typical single family parcel. Single Family Residential parcels are assigned 4.00 benefit points, one for each of the improvement types. Studies have consistently shown that the average multi-family residential unit impacts infrastructure approximately 80% as much as a single family residence. Condominium parcels are assigned 3.20 benefit points since the number of trips generated per condominium unit is approximately 80% of the typical single family residential units (Trip Generation, 2003). Multi-family residential parcels are assigned 2.40 benefit points per dwelling unit since the number of trips generated per multi-family residential unit, per the City's Traffic Study (2009), are 60% of the typical single family residential unit. To recognize the increase in economic activity and additional pedestrian traffic that non- residential properties generate compared to residential property, non-residential Commercial properties are assigned benefit points based on the average trip generations of non-residential property compared to a Single Family Residential property. Based on the City's Traffic Study (2009), and given that the non-residential parcels within the district are of mixed uses, the trip generation rate for non-residential parcels averages just under 320 trips per acre, which is approximately 5.6 times per acre that of a single family residential development. The trip generation rate is reduced to account for pass-through trips which are estimated to be 20%. ' Therefore, the economic benefit points assigned Commercial parcels is 4.50 per one residential benefit point. Commercial properties are assigned a total of 18.00 economic benefit points. The public services parcels and utility parcels within the District are used to provide services to the surrounding community, and are located based upon their proximity to the parcels they serve. These parcels receive no economic benefit from the collective improvements in place. Therefore, they are not assigned benefit points for economic activities. The availability of well-maintained sidewalk, landscaping and park improvements within the local community enhances the ability of owners of undeveloped parcels of land to develop those parcels, as studies have shown that there is an increase in demand for residents and businesses to locate within communities with well-maintained sidewalk, landscaping and park improvements. However, since undeveloped parcels generate fewer trips and given the limited activity these-properties provide, they receive a reduced economic benefit from the maintenance of the collective improvements. To account for this reduced benefit, but still recognize development potential, all undeveloped properties are assigned 1.50 benefit points. Common areas and roads are deemed to receive no benefit from the District maintenance activities because they serve as connectors for other properties and do not receive an economic benefit. The following shows the economic benefit points assigned to the parcel land use categories within the District: • Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 29 P267 Parcel Land Use Category Economic Benefit Points Single Family Residential 4.00 Condominium Residential 3.20 Multi-Family Residential 2.80 Commercial/Industrial 18.00 Public Service Parcels — Church/Fire 0.00 Station/School Undeveloped 1.50 Common Area/Roads/Utility 0.00 Total Special Benefit Points Calculation The formula below shows the total special benefit points calculation for each parcel within the District: Parcel's Total Parcel's Parcel's Parcel's Special Benefit = Aesthetic + Safety + Economic Points Benefit Points Benefit Points Benefit Points Parcel Factors The method of apportioning the benefit to the parcels within the District reflects the proportional special benefit assigned to each property within the District based upon various property characteristics of parcels as compared to other properties within the District. By adjusting the assigned special benefit points set forth above by parcel factors, a more complete picture of the proportional special benefits received by each parcel within the District is presented. Given that the special benefits provided by the District focus on aesthetic benefit, safety benefit, and economic activity benefits, it was determined that lot size (acreage) for non-residential parcels and units for residential parcels were the most appropriate parcel factors. The number of units for non-residential parcels would not accurately reflect the amount of development and redevelopment that may occur. In addition, a larger parcel allows for a greater area to develop and redevelop than smaller parcels, which corresponds to larger parcels receiving proportionately greater aesthetic, safety and economic activity benefits when compared to smaller parcels within the District. Therefore, the benefits assigned for each parcel in the District is in direct proportion to the size of the parcel and potential development of the parcel. Residential parcels are limited by the number of units on the parcel more than the actual lot size. However, the greater the lot size, the more units can be placed on a parcel, and the more persons who use and benefits from the collective improvements. Therefore the benefits assigned for each parcel in the District is in direct proportion to the units assigned to that parcel. The formula below shows the parcel factor calculation for each parcel within the District: Residential Parcel Factor = Units Non-Residential Parcel Factor = Acreage Total Benefit Units per Parcel Calculation Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 30 P268 To appropriately quantify and assign the total benefit units for each parcel within the District, the total special benefit points are further adjusted according to the formula below: Parcel's Total Parcel's Total Parcel Benefit Units = Special Benefit X Factor Points Total Special Benefit Units The total special benefit units for the District at this time are 76,064.85. Data Considerations and Parcel Changes The use of the latest Assessor's Secured Roll information has been and shall be used in the future as the basis in determining each parcel's land use category, units and lot size (acreage), unless better data was or is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number, the land use category, units and lot size (acreage) of the subsequent valid parcels shall serve as the basis in assigning parcel factor special benefit units. If a single parcel changes to multiple parcels, the special benefit units shall be recalculated based on the property type, number of units and acreage data for the new parcels, rather than each new parcel receiving a proportionate share of the original assessment. Special Considerations: Publicly Owned Parcels Any publicly owned parcels that benefit from the improvements cannot be exempt from the assessment. The special benefits accruing to these types of parcels must be determined using the same kind of formulas and benefit point assignment as applied to privately owned parcels. This requirement is clearly conveyed in Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution which states in part, "... Parcels within a district that are owned or used by any agency, the State of California or the United States shall not be exempt from assessment unless the agency can demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that those publicly owned parcels in fact receive no special benefit" Publically owned parcels are categorized and assigned benefit units using the same methodology as privately owned parcels, based on their land use as shown on the latest County Secured Roll. Rate per Benefit Unit The assessment rate per special benefit unit is calculated by dividing the total cost estimate to be assessed by the total special benefit units assigned to the parcels in the District. The following formula provides the assessment rate per special benefit unit calculation: Rate per _ Total Costs to / District's Total Benefit Unit be Assessed Benefit Units Method of Assessment Spread The method of assessment is based upon a formula that assigns the special benefits to each parcel, with special benefit points being adjusted by the parcel's number of units or lot size Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 31 P269 (acreage). The formula below provides a summary of the annual assessment calculation for each parcel in the District. (B) Parcel's Total = Parcel's Total X Parcel Benefit Units Special Benefit Factor Points Parcel's B otal Parcel's Parcel's Parcel's Special Benefit = Aesthetic + Safety + Economic Points Benefit Points Benefit Points Benefit Points (C) Residential Parcel Factor = Units Parcel Factor Non-Residential Parcel Factor = Acreage Applying the Method of Assessment Spread The maximum assessment for each parcel in the District is calculated by the following procedure: Step 1: Assign each parcel its appropriate land use category based on the most recent San Bernardino County Assessor's Secured Roll data. Step 2: Determine each parcel's appropriate aesthetic benefit points based on land use. The aesthetic benefit points are shown in the following table: Parcel Land Use Category Aesthetic Benefit Points Single Family Residential 4.00 Condominium Residential 2.80 Multi-Family Residential 2.80 Commercial/Industrial 16.00 Public Service Parcels— Church/Fire 1.00 Station/School Undeveloped 0.40 Common Area/Roads/Easements/Utility 0.00 Step 3: Determine each parcel's appropriate safety benefit points based on land use. The safety benefit points are shown in the following table: Parcel Land Use Category Safety Benefit Points Single Family Residential 3.00 Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 32 P270 Condominium Residential 2.10 Multi-Family Residential 2.10 Commercial/Industrial 18.00 Public Service Parcels - Church/Fire Station/School 2.00 Undeveloped 0.30 Common Area/Roads/Easements/Utility 0.00 Step 4: Determine each parcel's appropriate economic benefit points based on land use. The economic benefit points are shown in the following table: Parcel Land Use Category Economic Benefit Points Single Family Residential 4.00 Condominium Residential 3.20 Multi-Family Residential 2.80 Commercial/Industrial 18.00 Public Service Parcels - Church/Fire Station/School 0.00 Undeveloped 1.50 Common Area/Roads/Utility 0.00 Step 5: Sum the aesthetic benefit points, safety benefit points and economic benefit points for each parcel. The total benefit points are shown in the following table: Aesthetic Safety Economic Total Benefit Benefit Benefit Benefit Parcel Land Use Category Points Points Points Points Single Family Residential 4.00 3.00 4.00 11.00 ' Condominium Residential 2.80 2.10 3.20 8.10 Multi-Family Residential 2.80 2.10 2.80 7.70 Commercial/Industrial 16.00 18.00 18.00 52.00 Public Service Parcels - Church/Fire 1.00 2.00 0.00 3.00 Station/School Undeveloped 0.40 0.30 1.50 2.20 Common Area/Roads/Easements/Utility 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)-City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 33 P271 Step 6: Determine the appropriate parcel factor based on the parcel's land use. The unit of measurement for each parcel factor, by land use, is shown in the following table: Residential Parcel Factor = Units Non-Residential Parcel Factor = Acreage Step 7: Multiply the total benefit points by parcel factor to compute each parcel's total special benefit units. Step 8: Sum the result of Step 7 for all parcels in the District. Step 9: Separate the general benefit from the special benefit, and divide the portion of the budget representing special benefit by the result of Step 8 to compute the rate per benefit unit. Step 10: Multiply each parcel's total benefit units by the result of Step 9 to compute each parcel's assessment. Step 11: In future years the rate per benefit unit may be adjusted by inflation. 2015/16 Proposed Maximum Assessment Rates - The 2015/16 maximum allowable assessment rate is calculated by dividing the net total to be assessed by the total special benefit units assigned to parcels in the District based on property type, unit and acreage data. For Fiscal Year 2015/16, the calculation is as follows: Maximum Assessment Special Benefit District's Total per Benefit Unit to be Assessed Benefit Units $42.28 = $3,213,658.08 / 76,029.54 The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District, by land use category: Fiscal Year Maximum Assessment per EBU Actual Assessment per EBU 2013/14 42.01 42.00 2014/15 42.23 42.00 Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 34 P272 2015/16 42.28 42.28 Maximum Allowable Total Benefit Parcel Assessment for FY Parcel Land Use Category Points Factor 2015/16 Single Family Residential 11.00 Unit $464.97 Condominium Residential 8.10 Unit 342.18 Multi-Family Residential 7.70 Unit 325.47 Commercial/Industrial 52.00 Acre 2,198.04 Public Service Parcels—Church/Fire 3.00 Acre 126.81 Station/School Undeveloped 2.20 Acre 92.99 Common Area/Roads/Easements/Utility 0.00 Parcel 0.00 Cost of Living Inflator Each fiscal year, beginning Fiscal Year 2015/16, the maximum allowable assessment amount may be increased by the lesser of 3% or the percentage change in the year ending February preceding the start of the Fiscal Year of the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U), for the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County area. If for any reason the percentage change is negative, the maximum allowable assessment would not be decreased by reason of such negative percentage change and would remain at the amount as computed on the previous fiscal year regardless of any CPI-U adjustment. If operating costs are such that the maximum assessment amount is not needed, the City would levy only what is needed for that fiscal year. The actual assessment rate for Fiscal Year 2015/16 will increase from $462.00 to $464.97 per single-family residence, a rate increase of 0.64% as compared to Fiscal Year 2014/15. Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 35 P273 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following pages. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County of San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 36 LE 91/StOZ JeaA isH eOuowe�nJ otpue>J 4o AIIO—(z awi) P274 eD ppls!a aDueualu!ew adeDspuel pue s)jJed poogJogq2iaN eiaolp!A N a) � c 0g in � � Q'', J o 4 N O 1 O J 0 a 1' ny wagO cu t rkj II J i t It m o V &kCm 1 1111L\a) `i < Z (1) ny iSe3 c 5 .� v ca• AV epuemu 'AV epuemia3 i 0 �, v �.� V = 8tee�O ea 1 ■— AV Jalsayooa 1 n Jalsa o0 Z � � y 4 b "1 i AV ue)ifli f'� I' ,` ' AV ua>l!II!W f I j Iny uaneH ` i1 Jny uaneH ny esouuaH I Ay esotwaH i ^d Pleq!4oid ! f 1 1ny ple414ord 1 r AV uewl�aH — r� Y AV uewllaH � v 1' nypeA u� 1S uegawe� 11i1 t . cc ' i I le 1. litre/111'1i r -4 2 co Pptillip N 0 pct' re . co 0 >, 11111111;14 1 'PP . ... Y eil 3 N CO 1t�'i•�tt �!.1 P275 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2015/16 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Actual Assessment Actual Total Total Rate for FY Assessment Property Type Units/Acres EBUs 2015/16(1) for 2015/16(2) Single Family 5,859.00 64,449.00 $464.97 per unit $2,724,259.23 Residential Condominium 559.00 4,527.90 $342.18 per unit 191,278.62 Residential Multi-Family 589.00 4,535.30 $325.47 per unit 191,701.83 Residential Commercial/Industrial 42.33 2,200.90 $2, per acre or 93,043.03 portion thereof Public Service Parcels —Church/Fire 70.27 210.82 $126.81 per acre or 8,910.92 Stattion/School portion thereof Undeveloped 48.01 105.62 $92.99 per acre or 4,464.44 portion thereof Common Area, Roads, Easements, Utility 0.00 0.00 $0.00 per parcel 0.00 Parcels Total 7,167.61 76,029.54 $3,213,658.08 (1) The actual allowable assessment rates have been rounded down to the nearest dollar. (2) The total 2015/16 assessment amount differs from the District Budget net total to be assessed due to rounding. Annexations The following Annexations are effective for the 2015/16 Fiscal Year. APN Annexation Project Total Total Property Type Date Name Units/Acres EBUS 1089-581-01 05/21/14 TR 18212 67.00 67.00 Condominiums Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2)—City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2015/16 38 P276 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2015/2016 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A (Hyssop) P277 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3A (HYSSOP) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tern William Alexander, Council Member Lynne B. Kennedy, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology Dean Rodia, Parks & Landscape Superintendent Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P278 TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Letter 1 Introduction 3 Reason for Assessment, Process for Annual Assessment Plans and Specifications 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District Description of Improvements and Services Map of Improvements Estimate of Costs 7 District Budget Definitions of Budget Items Method of Assessment 10 General General Benefit Special Benefit Method of Assessment Spread Assessment Diagram 13 Assessment Roll 15 Assessment Roll Annexations P279 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 15, 2015 the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 15-119, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A (Hyssop Maintenance District) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2015/16 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained; an es timate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2015/16 Total Estimated Assessment $3,670.00 Plus Anticipated Interest Earnings 440.00 Total Estimated Revenue $4,110.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund _ 6.930.00 Total Expenditure Budget $11,050.00 Total District EBU Count 9.00 Actual Assessment per EBU _ $413.74 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $413.74 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No.3A—City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P280 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirely of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefitted Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Annual Engineer's Report, Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. QAOFESSip kt SO 49 CD aT CNvo�.�C059672 •^Y � •6.30• r r , V r CIVIL a Itcr Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer • Landscape Maintenance District No.3A—City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P281 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a Landscape Maintenance District No.3A—City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P282 written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, o opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold a community meeting with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy • and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If the is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No.3A—City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2015/16 • P283 • PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City South and East of Hyssop Drive south of 6th Street. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements maintained by the District include the paseos, community trails, trees, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the District. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble-shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriptive Location J-1 The west side of Hyssop from south of 6th street to the south end of the cul-de-sac. Ground Cover area: 6,050 square feet Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No.3A—City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2015/16 91/STOZ aeaA leDsid P284 9 e9uoweanD oyOuea;o Alit-VE•oN lauisia apueualthelnj ade spuei i a Z z w a� w I- z z CE T0 J o - 0 N ccETc& fflE1 ff t 4z> ® 11110 ■ 1 qc (...) 'U.. o 4p.a In z CD 1.1530NR& RI E co\ MAS11 ad0Sti N MI 911 dad o _ C3 1 daNO s—I Q. of I 1„,........._ KI CPU J a° �' \ l_:: i :;ESItea...Ea' ic ,.- ..st-.:?€oas.eo Qa 1y.4!;.1 I"I; v I I °L E' . =_ I— g e s'o :E"' 4` V I -- ° L �rto10 43 L ; •• •° ••• • 7 °i a %3 E rc`o°% P285 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2015/16 Budget Personnel Services Regular Payroll $ 0.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 0.00 Subtotal Personnel $ 0.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $ 1,100.00 • Contract Services 7,500.00 Utilities Water Utilities 1,460.00 Electric Utilities 840.00 Assessment Administration 50.00 General Overhead 100.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $ 11,050.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Outlay—Vehicles $ 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $ 0.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 11,050.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 3,670.00 Plus Anticipated Interest Earnings 440.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 4,110.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 6,930.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 11,040.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 3,723.66 Total District EBU Count 9.00 Actual Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 413.74 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 413.74 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund Landscape Maintenance District No.3A—City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P286 balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2015 Reserve Fund Balance $ 39,723.00 Use of Operating Reserve Fund — Fiscal Year 2015/16 (6,930.00) Operating Reserve Contribution — Fiscal Year 2015/16 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2016 Reserve Fund Balance $ 32,793.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities - Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities - Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Landscape Maintenance District No.3A—City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P287 Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. • Landscape Maintenance District No.3A—City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P288 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D. all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A—City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P289 In this Assessment District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the District and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the District. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the District which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the District and proximate to the improvements and within the Assessment District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit • derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. Landscape Maintenance District No.3A—City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P29O When the District was formed in 1979, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. Vacant parcels are assigned an EBU value of 0.25 per acre because they receive a lesser benefit from the improvements until such time as development occurs. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Non-Residential 1.00 Parcel • The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type Maximum Allowable Actual Total Total (County Use Code) Assessment Rate Assessment Units/Acres EBUs per EBU Rate per EBU Non-Residential $413.74 $413.74 9 9 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. • Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A—City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P291 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. • Landscape Maintenance District No.3A—City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9T/STOZ Ye8A leDs j P292 Vi a&uoweDnj oq uea Jo Ain—V£'oN Pulsa aDueualuleiN adepspuei Qw M to C J M Q � O C Q ~ U) $ ' O CD I m t 3 ,w I m o Q I Lo—� ®I Q n Ise] rn L — 1 AV epuen143, / Ay epueenp3 v I -- jl k'=��1 a19 llawo Aep C ny iajsegooa i I — nyJalsayooa ..I AV ua8!II!W !._s__..___— (1-1 �-ny uaH!II!W I 1 AV uaneH I \, '\) 1 —c�—' —Inv uaneH AV esowi I =--- —' — I y aH I —i ; 1 I AV esowiaH AV PIe9!4oJv — I h�- IAV PIe9!4oiy Ay uewpaH —_ ) — JAy uewIlaH I co rn i 1F (ny p Aau!n is ugeweo t!-4 I I n � I Iiiliei�Iz6i E _1 Et sthttf 3)2 t c m •EA IltY�1'44 J _ 3 L !DIYisi nE+ _ y p 11, tgo 'O _ CO O Q S'c .Et gP7 X m m FL 8 14101:1i 0 co m g Eto 1 vt = 10112 i�;. .. ` Iqii l ' Y fp '_sy lli:t� a P293 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2015/16 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable (County Use Code) per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Non-Residential $413.74 9 9 $3,723.66 'Actual Assessment Rate per EBU" is the same as "Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate Per EBU". A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2015/16 Fiscal Year. • • • Landscape Maintenance District No.3A—City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P294 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2015/2016 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial) P295 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tern William Alexander, Council Member Lynne B. Kennedy, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology Dean Rodia, Parks & Landscape Superintendent Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P296 TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Letter 1 Introduction 3 Reason for Assessment Process for Annual Assessment Plans and Specifications 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District Description of Improvements and Services Map of Improvements Estimate of Costs 10 District Budget Definitions of Budget Items Method of Assessment 13 General General Benefit Special Benefit Method of Assessment Spread Assessment Diagram 16 Assessment Roll 18 Assessment Roll Annexations P297 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 15, 2015, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga, under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No 15-119, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2015/16 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2015/16 Total Estimated Assessment $ 1,026,940.00 Metrolink Parking Permit Revenues 240,000.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 17,380.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 1,284,320.00 Plus Use Operating Reserve Fund 578,470.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 1,862,790.00 Total District EBU Count 2,910.83 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 352.80 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $ 352.80 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said Landscape Maintenance District No.3B—City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P298 parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirely of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefitted Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Annual Engineer's Report, Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance wit ,.•:e.rder of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. it,OFESS/044/ (it MC12 Vi \Y \sj. CMt. P 9 OF COQ' Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No.3B—City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P299 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a Landscape Maintenance District No.3B—City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P300 written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, o opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold a community meeting with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If the is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No.38—City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P301 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as the commercial and industrial area of the City which is generally bounded by Foothill Boulevard on the north, 4`h Street on the South, East Avenue on the east and Grove Avenue on the west. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways, Metrolink, and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble-shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriptive Location J-2 The monument at the northeast corner of Haven and 4'h Street. Ground Cover area: 5,715 square feet Hardscape area: 6,068 square feet J-3 The 61h Street median from Milliken to Pittsburg. Ground Cover area: 3,300 square feet J-4 The entry monuments on the east and west side of 41h and Milliken. Ground Cover area: 19,771 square feet Hardscape area: 9,060 square feet J-5 The Milliken median from Arrow to Jersey. Landscape Maintenance District No.3B—City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P3O2 • Ground Cover area: 10,220 square feet J-6 The Spruce median from Foothill to White Oak. Ground Cover area: 4.300 square feet J-7 The 6t" Street median from Pittsburg to Richmond. Ground Cover area: 5,114 square feet J-8 The 6th Street median from Richmond to Buffalo. Ground Cover area: 2,476 square feet J-9 The Milliken railroad underpass. Ground Cover area: 165,633 square feet, 12-12-01 added 5199 sq feet Turf area: 4,897 square feet J-10 The 6th Street median from Cleveland to 1,820 feet east of Cleveland. Ground Cover area: 13,310 square feet J-11 The 6'" Street median from Buffalo to Rochester. Ground Cover area: 12,400 square feet J-12 The Milliken median from Arrow to Century. Ground Cover area: 13,855 square feet J-13 The Milliken median from Century to Foothill Blvd. Ground Cover area: 3,330 square feet J-14 The 6th Street median from Utica to Cleveland. Ground Cover area: 8,559 square feet J-15 The 6th Street median from Haven to Utica. Ground Cover area: 7,680 square feet J-16 Day creek median from Church to Foothill. Ground Cover area: 8,466 square feet J-17 The Day Creek medians south of Foothill including the traffic circle. Ground Cover area: 6,490 square feet H-1 The Haven median from 4th Street to 6th Street. Ground Cover area: 21,205 square feet 3/25/13: Converted 8,935 sq. ft. of turf to ground cover effective 4/1/13 Landscape Maintenance District No.3B—City of Rancho Cucamonga .6 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P303 H-2 The Haven medians from 6`" Street to the underpass bridge. The east and west side parkways and slopes on Haven from Acacia Street to underpass bridge. Ground Cover area: 54,720 square feet 3/25/13: Converted 2,960 sqft of turf to ground cover effective 4/1/13 H-3 The Haven medians from underpass bridge to Arrow Route. The east and west side • parkways and slopes on Haven from the underpass bridge to Jersey Blvd. Ground Cover area: 56,210 square feet H-4 The Haven median from Arrow Route to Foothill. Ground Cover area: 15,156 square feet H-5 The Haven median from Foothill to Church. Ground Cover area: 11,502 square feet FH-1 The Foothill median from Spruce to Haven. Ground Cover area: 4,571 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 9,141; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by LMD 4-R. FH-2 The Foothill median from Spruce to Milliken. Ground Cover area: 7,940 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 15,879; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by LMD 4-R. FH-3 The Foothill median from 790 feet west of Market Place to Market Place. Ground Cover area: 4,434 square feet FH-4 The Foothill median from Market Place to Etiwanda. Ground Cover area: 10,392 square feet FH-5 The Foothill median from 360 feet west of Masi Dr. to 516 feet west of Masi Dr. Ground Cover area: 800 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 1,600; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by LMD 4-R. FH-6 The Foothill median from Masi Plaza to Rochester. Ground Cover area: 800 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 1,600; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by LMD 4-R. FH-7 The Foothill boulevard median from Vineyard to Orchard Plaza. Ground Cover area: 2,605 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No.3B—City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P3O4 FH-8 The Foothill boulevard median from Orchard Plaza to Lion Street. Ground Cover area: 344 square feet FH-9 The Foothill boulevard median from Hellman to Malachite and from Malachite to Archibald. Ground Cover area: 21,474 square feet FH-10 The Foothill boulevard median from Archibald to Ramona. Ground Cover area: 4,770 square feet FH-11 The Foothill boulevard median from Ramona to Hermosa. Ground Cover area: 5,210 square feet FH-12 The Foothill boulevard median from Hermosa to Center. Ground Cover area: 6,329 square feet FH-13 The Foothill boulevard median from Center to Haven. Ground Cover area: 6,286 square feet FH-14 The Foothill boulevard median from Rochester to 600 feet east of Rochester. Ground Cover area: 1,356 square feet Site reduced to 5,979 square feet due to median renovation. FH-15 The Foothill boulevard median from 1,225 feet west of Day Creek to Day Creek. Ground Cover area: 4,905 square feet FH-16 The Foothill boulevard median from Day Creek to the 15 freeway. Ground Cover area: 9,808 square feet Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No.3B—City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9Z/SLOZ JeaA leasi j P305 6 e2uoweDnD ogDuea Jo Aiij—8£ oN PPialsia aDueualuieL adeJspuei °` J Z �` a U 40: cE� go 4 Z E Ear`Vitt'ic°c ^o a W J 0 � nE.2:f.. oE='`-3gg W _I 5.06!WOINO0ii 0 W C7 Y LL_ - `� ;n yrt S=§`o°eF'^` a c cc a a `E_ ;£ /� ( II r° ° "q�g4r.Ai°.s,x d II La q;$gaig, 2-1 EoM72Z,- o! o" o c a 1 Y°.n gE= !3 p1_ N CO m EAOUF.,o`-•La-gg.-;8 m L 3 =A.R.iA_ ao$ 3f.8, II g o II LL n A\, II ... .. nrnr.yy Ise] I II I II II j M ny epueMii3 nV epuemu W el / �1•0++'L 4.a Q AV/alsayaoa � �� SL-I p • I y lalsayooa J a• ■ U • AA,, W o 4. ny ua�gp IT - in .. AV ualill�W �..�. w.i.'y \ I A. Q� L.rurur vb.. I i _ I • _ h .cc Q II c 1 \ _ I. _ c. ny uaneHI !! LL • • •• V uaneH 0. j II . . II V j II • U) AN/esowlaH 1 II V esowlaH no 1:3 j II m C II I 1 II t J ^V PIeQaplV 1 `1 LL CV PI8 IJ )V 1 �� CV uewpaH 1 _ in uewllaH 1 ` �,� o\ O 4 1 � ^V pleAaulA 1 \ IS Ueliaule3: / I ,m8011 \I. \\ .Murur.1 �.1 c �A_..1_ulii \\ n anOJ .0 L J m CC N V J - I''�� N = o ao < �� G s� m °o ."2 • Q 01,.._,‹c_, ce 7 �.r■■r.■r16 rur■... i na 0 m N P306 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2015/16 Budget Personnel Services Regular Payroll $ 53,480.00 Overtime Salaries 0.00 Part-time Salaries 11,600.00 Fringe Benefits 26.860.00 Subtotal Personnel $ 91,940.00 Operations and Maintenance Computer Software $ 500.00 Operations and Maintenance 11,100.00 Operations and Maintenance/Facilities 6,000.00 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 0.00 Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental 0.00 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 0.00 Contract Services 498,830.00 Contract Services/Facilities 112,000.00 Tree Maintenance 22,290.00 Telephone Utilities 600.00 Water Utilities 130,960.00 Electric Utilities 59,390.00 Assessment Administration 6,270.00 General Overhead 21.070.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $ 869,010.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Outlay-Equipment $ 200,000.00 Capital Projects $ 665,000.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $ 865,000.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 1,825,950.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 1,026,940.00 Plus Metrolink Parking Permit Revenues 240,000.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 17.380.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 1,284,320.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 578,470.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 1,862,790.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 1,026,940.82 Landscape Maintenance District No.3B—City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P307 Total District EBU Count 2,910.83 Actual Assessment per EBU —Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 352.80 I Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU —Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 352.80 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2015 Reserve Fund Balance $ 1,065,867.00 Use of Operating Reserve Fund — Fiscal Year 2015/16 (578,790.00) Operating Reserve Contribution — Fiscal Year 2015/16 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2016 Reserve Fund Balance $ 487,077.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. • Landscape Maintenance District No.3B—City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P308 Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities - Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities - Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures • Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection • Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No.3B—City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2015/16 • P309 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D. all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIIID also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIIID of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. Landscape Maintenance District No.38—City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P31O In this Assessment District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the District and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the District. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the District which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the District and proximate to the improvements and within the Assessment District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. Landscape Maintenance District No.3B—City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P311 When the District was formed in 1979, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land- use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units IProperty Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Non-Residential 1.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type Maximum Allowable Actual Total Total (County Use Code) Assessment Rate Assessment Units/Acres EBUs per EBU Rate per EBU I Non-Residential $352.80 $352.80 2,910.83 2,910.83 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No.3B—City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P312 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. • • • Landscape Maintenance District No.3B—City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9I/STOZ JeaA'emu P31 3 LT e2uoweano oq uea;o AJ!D—8E ON 1p!J s!a aaueualu!ew adempuel co a1 m M 2 i Ira r 1 •lift m ., ci 0 N-Lo o Ay AJJ043 r'L CD lia 111 M w _ N J m ri O 0 I 03 t 3 w Ca g a `-` Ay pea 6 Nr 0 Ay epuempa Ay epueMg3 0 a --- 1 = Ay JelsayOOI i • M ! Ay JaisayOOb J r—j ny ua)I!II!IN At/ua�l!II!W Ay UOAEH Ay uaneH Ay esOWJeH Ay esOWJOH AV Plegl4ON AV Pleq!uOJ`d ny uewllaH N Ay uewll9H .c t pieA ny au!n is uellauJe3 Ay aAOJ9 iI b 05 0 agf of J O ao i-iat¢4 b F c g Q 014121111 03 gii 0 M m t I till'I '!;!y� b •�` yy L \� •: �6 1 P;!.11!E P314 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2015/16 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum and actual assessments for the District: • Maximum Maximum Property Type Allowable Total Total Allowable (County Use Code) Assessment Rate Units/Acres EBUs Assessment per EBU Non-Residential $352.80 2,910.83 2,910.83 $1,026,94082 *"Actual Assessment Rate per EBU" is the same as "Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate Per EBU". A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following Annexations are effective for the 2015/16 Fiscal Year. APN Annexation Project Name Total Total Property Type Date Units/Acres EBUS 0229-262-01, 05/21/14 DRC2008- 5.53 5.53 Non-Residential 31 00185 0229-131-04, 05/21/14 PM 19448 74.75 74.75 Non-Residential 17825 0229-171-01 11/19/14 DRC2012- 4.77 4.77 Non-Residential 00878 Landscape Maintenance District No.38—City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P315 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2015/2016 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R (Terra Vista Planned Community) P316 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4-R (TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tern William Alexander, Council Member Lynne B. Kennedy, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology Dean Rodia, Parks & Landscape Superintendent Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P317 TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Letter 1 Introduction 3 Reason for Assessment Process for Annual Assessment Plans and Specifications 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District Description of Improvements and Services Map of Improvements Estimate of Costs 10 District Budget Definitions of Budget Items Method of Assessment 13 General General Benefit Special Benefit Method of Assessment Spread Assessment Diagram 17 Assessment Roll 19 Assessment Roll Annexations P318 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 15, 2015 the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 15-119, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R (Terra Vista Planned Community) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2015/16 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2015/16 Total Estimated Assessment $ 2,823,880.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 19.460.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 2,843,340.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 14,150.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 2,857,490.00 Total District EBU Count 6,917.72 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 408.21 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $ 408.21 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P319 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirely of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefitted Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Annual Engineer's Report, Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. g%OFESS/Oy\ \; NDREws�Ey�\ Q No.C063672 9 Exp„WO. 17 4 i sr CML �P .n-XL Of CALIEpe- Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer • Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P320 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any,part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P321 written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. • The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, o opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold a community meeting with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If the is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No.4-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P322 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area located north of Foothill Boulevard, west of Rochester Avenue, east of Haven Avenue, south of Base Line Road and includes the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Haven Avenue. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of the paseos, parkways, median islands, street trees, parks, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the Terra Vista Planned Community. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines; ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble-shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Spruce Park, Mountain View Park, Ralph M. Lewis Park, Coyote Canyon Park, Milliken Park and West Greenway Park The street trees within the residential parkways and tree maintenance easements to be maintained by the District are on the following streets, located within the boundaries of the District: Amiata Dr Clarisa PI Danner Ct Bastia Ct Corsica Ct De Anza Dr Blackhorse Ct (Countryview to Milliken) Derby PI Brandywine PI Countryview Downing Ct Bunkerhill Dr (Mt. View to Palacio) Ellena Wy Cedarbrook PI Covington PI (s/o Terra Vista to Chesterton Dr Danbury Dr Fitzpatrick) Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P323 • Emery PI Potomac Ct Terra Vista Pky Fitzpatrick Dr Radcliff PI (Church to Brandywine) Fulbourn Ct Regent Dr Wellington PI Hinton Ct Rockingham Ct Yorktown Ct Linaro Rd Saranza PI Meyers Dr Southhampton Ct The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriptive Location TV-1 The Base Line median from Haven to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 16,613 square feet Turf area: 19,030 square feet Hardscape area: 10,630 square feet Due to the location of the improvements, an additional 2,769 square feet of ground cover area and 1,478 square feet of turf area of the median are maintained by the City; however that portion is not funded by the District and instead funded by the City's General Fund. TV-2 The Base Line median from Spruce to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 13,504 square feet Turf area: 16,109 square feet Hardscape area: 12,575 square feet Due to the location of the improvements, an additional 2,749 square feet of ground cover area and 1,598 square feet of turf area of the median are maintained by the City; however that portion is not funded by the District and instead funded by the City's General Fund. TV-3 The Base Line median from Spruce to Milliken. Ground Cover area: 8,418 square feet Turf area: 13,573 square feet Hardscape area: 16,567 square feet Due to the location of the improvements, an additional 5,247 square feet of ground cover area and 4,289 square feet of turf area of the median are maintained by the City; however that portion is not funded by the District and instead funded by the City's General Fund. TV-4 The south side of Base Line from 800 feet east of Spruce to Milliken. The cul-de-sac at the north end of Cascade. Ground Cover area: 9,278 square feet Turf Cover area: 12,659 square feet Hardscape area: 7,950 square feet TV-5 The north side of Terra Vista Parkway from Belpine to 112 feet west of Butterfield; Terra Vista Parkway median from Spruce to Milliken and the south side of Terra Vista Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P324 Parkway from 164 feet west of Belpine to Belpine. Ground Cover area: 13,411 square feet Turf area: 6,555 square feet Hardscape area: 12,978 square feet TV-6 The north side of Terra Vista Parkway from Spruce to 175 feet north of countryside and Terra Vista Parkway median from Church to Spruce. Ground Cover area: 17,991 square feet Turf area: 11,413 square feet Hardscape area: 11,452 square feet TV-7 The north side of Church from the west side of Deer Creek Channel to Terra Vista Parkway. The west side of Terra Vista Parkway from Church to 175 feet north of Countryside. Ground Cover area: 9,924 square feet Turf area: 5,378 square feet Hardscape area: 6,426 square feet TV-8 The southeast corner of Church and Haven; the Church median from Haven to Terra Vista Parkway and the wash end on the Northwest corner of the Deer Creek Channel and Church. Ground Cover area: 26,876 square feet Hardscape area: 2,306 square feet Hardscape area: 2,788 square feet • TV-9 The Church median from Terra Vista Parkway to Spruce Avenue. Ground Cover area: 7,829 square feet • Hardscape area: 6,605 square feet TV-10 The east side of Valencia from Base Line to the pre-school; the south side of Augusta from Valencia to Meadow Lark and the west side of Summerfield from Valencia to Evergreen. Ground Cover area: 20,818 square feet Turf area: 18,634 square feet Hardscape area: 8,666 square feet TV-11 The paseo at Parkside and Clover from Parkside to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,795 square feet Hardscape area: 1,049 square feet TV-12 The east side of Haven from the pre-school to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 6,170 square feet Turf area: 2,091 square feet Hardscape area: 1,060 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No.4-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga • 7 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P325 TV-13 The east side of Spruce from Elm to Mountain View; the north and south sides of Norfolk from Spruce to Cardiff; the south side of Mountain View from Spruce to 290 feet east of Belvedere and the paseo from Spruce to Countryview. Ground Cover area: 8,459 square feet Turf area: 3,355 square feet Hardscape area: 8,886 square feet TV-14 The south side of Mountain View from 290 feet east of Belvedere to 590 feet east of Fairhaven; the paseo south of Mountain View between Belvedere and Fairhaven to Country View and from Countryview Drive to West Greenway Corridor. Ground Cover area: 19,030 square feet Turf area: 8,430 square feet Hardscape area: 9,262 square feet TV-15 The north side of Mountain View from 634 feet west of Biarritz to Milliken. Ground Cover area: 4,571 square feet Turf area: 4,738 square feet Hardscape area: 5,104 square feet TV-16 The west Greenway Corridor from the northeast corner of Elm and Spruce to West Greenway. Ground Cover area: 15,529 square feet Turf area: 20,884 square feet Hardscape area: 20,626 square feet TV-17 The west side of Milliken from 585 feet north of Mountain View to Mountain View. Ground Cover area: 5,835 square feet Turf area: 3,564 square feet Hardscape area: 2,340 square feet TV-18 The south side of Mountain View from approximately 250 feet west of Claridge to Terra Vista Parkway. The south side of Terra Vista Parkway from Mountain View to • East Greenway Corridor. Terra Vista Parkway from Mountain View to East Greenway Corridor. Ground Cover area: 18,316 square feet Turf area: 5,944 square feet Hardscape area: 23,800 square feet TV-19 The Terra Vista Parkway median from Milliken to Mountain View. The north side of Terra Vista Parkway from 68 feet north of Addison to Mountain View. The west side of Mountain View from Grapevine to Terra Vista Parkway. Ground Cover area: 20,306 square feet Turf area: 3,886 square feet Hardscape area: 11,478 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P326 TV-20 The Church median from Milliken to 675 feet east of Milliken. Ground Cover area: 2,860 square feet Hardscape area: 2,112 square feet TV-21 The Church median from Milliken to Spruce. Ground Cover area: 16,811 square feet Turf area: 335 square feet Hardscape area: 14,880 square feet TV-22 The Milliken median from Mountain View to Foothill. Ground Cover area: 16,436 square feet Hardscape area: 16,267 square feet TV-23 The Milliken underpass from West Greenway Park to Milliken Park. Ground Cover area: 19,271 square feet Turf area: 22,139 square feet Hardscape area: 18,119 square feet TV-24 The east side of Haven from 145 feet south of Creekbridge to 600 feet north of Creekbridge; the north side of Creekbridge from Brookside to Haven and the paseo from Creekbridge and Brookside to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 5,851 square feet Turf area: 9,965 square feet Hardscape area: 4,351 square feet TV-25 The east side of Haven form 145 feet south of Creekbridge to 410 feet south of Creekbridge. Ground Cover area: 3,319 square feet Turf area: 1,677 square feet Hardscape area: 1,779 square feet TV-26 The paseo at Plymouth south of Essex from Plymouth to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 1,956 square feet Hardscape area: 2,385 square feet TV-27 The paseo from Terra Vista Parkway to Windsong and from Windsong to Plymouth. Ground Cover area: 2,270 square feet Turf area: 2,731 square feet Hardscape area: 3,332 square feet TV-28 The paseo on the north side of 7552 Hardy. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P327 Ground Cover area: 630 square feet Turf area: 733 square feet Hardscape area: 432 square feet TV-29 The East Greenway Corridor from Milliken Park to Terra Vista Parkway, including the turf area at the entrance to Tract 16157. Ground Cover area: 17,780 square feet Turf area: 52,403 square feet Hardscape area: 29,888 square feet TV-30 The Milliken Median from Mountain View to Base Line. Ground Cover area: 11,890 square feet Hardscape area: 10,260 square feet TV-31 The paseo from Elm to West Greenway Park. Ground Cover area: 4,770 square feet Hardscape area: 8,900 square feet N-32 The Greenwich paseo from Greenwich to Muirfield. Ground Cover area: 1,323 square feet Hardscape area: 1,456 square feet N-33 The south side of Mountain View from 430 feet west of Country View to Country View. Ground Cover area: 3,434 square feet Turf area: 1,853 square feet Hardscape area: 1,720 square feet N-34 The south side of Terra Vista Parkway from 390 feet west of Belpine to Belpine. Ground Cover area: 1,342 square feet Turf area: 1,887 square feet Hardscape area: 1,612 square feet TV-35 The Trail Northeast of Ruth Musser School from Terra Vista Parkway to Spruce. Ground Cover area: 9,285 square feet Hardscape area: 5,148 square feet TV-36 The east side of Countryview Dr. from Corsica to Mountain View Drive. The south side of Mountain View Dr. from Countryview Dr. to Milliken. The west side of Milliken from Mountain View Dr. to the West Greenway Corridor. Ground Cover area: 9,141 square feet Turf area: 5,895 square feet Hardscape area: 6,058 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P328 TV-37 The north side of Meyers from Emery Place to Elm. Ground Cover area: 5,860 square feet Turf area: 5,300 square feet Hardscape area: 1,283 square feet TV-38 The Church median from Rochester to Terra Vista Parkway median from Church to 853 feet north of Church. Ground Cover area: 8,510 square feet Hardscape area: 5,640 square feet TV-39 The north side of Mountain View form 250 feet east of Milliken to Milliken. The east side of Milliken from Mountain View to Terra Vista Parkway. Ground Cover area: 16,751 square feet Hardscape area: 15,716 square feet TV-40 The south side of Terra Vista Parkway from Milliken to Mountain View. Ground Cover area: 11,630 square feet Hardscape area: 19,738 square feet TV-41 The paseo east of Milliken from Terra Vista Parkway south to Mountain View. Ground Cover area: 4,081 square feet Hardscape area: 9,640 square feet TV-42 The north side of Mountain View from Terra Vista Parkway to 250 feet east of Milliken. Ground Cover area: 10,994 square feet Hardscape area: 14,777 square feet TV-43 Church median and parkway from Malaga to Terra Vista Parkway. Ground Cover area: 7,506 square feet Hardscape area: 3,955 square feet TV-44 The south side of Church from Terra Vista Parkway to Rochester. Ground Cover area: 10,400 square feet Hardscape area: 7,606 square feet TV-45 The west side of Rochester from Church to Malaga. Ground cover area: 20,693 square feet Hardscape area: 12,450 square feet TV-46 The north side of Malaga from Church to Rochester. Ground Cover area: 19,843 square feet Hardscape area: 18,000 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No.4-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P329 TV-47 The east side of Terra Vista Parkway from Church to Brandywine. The paseo from Brandywine to Bunker Hill Drive. The east side of Radcliff from Bunker to Malaga. Ground Cover area: 17,838 square feet Hardscape area: 9,023 square feet TV-48 The Church median from 750 feet east of Milliken to Malaga Ave. • Ground Cover area: 5,554 square feet Hardscape area: 9,698 square feet • FH-1 The Foothill median from Spruce to Haven. Ground Cover area: 4,571 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 9,141; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by LMD 3B. FH-2 The Foothill median from Spruce to Haven. Ground Cover area: 7,940 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 15,879; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by LMD 3B. FH-5 The Foothill median from 360 feet west of Masi Dr to 516 feet west of Masi Dr. Ground Cover area: 800 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 1,600; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by LMD 3B. FH-6 The Foothill median form Masi Plaza to Rochester. Ground Cover area: 800 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 1,600; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by LMD 3B. H-5 The Haven median form Foothill to Church. Ground Cover area: 11,502 square feet 3/25/13: Converted 10,572 sq ft of turf to ground cover effective 4/1/13. Area listed is the 50% maintained by LMD 4R. An equal amount is maintained by LMD 3B. H-6 Haven median form Church to Baseline. Ground Cover area: 9,615 square feet 3/25/13: Converted 8,708 sq. ft. of turf to ground cover effective 4/1/13. Area listed is the 50% maintained by LMD 4R. An equal amount is maintained by the General Fund. H-7 The Haven median from Baseline to Southern Pacific railroad tracks. Ground Cover area: 3,130 square feet 3/25/13: Converted 3,992 sq. ft. of turf to ground cover effective 4/1/13. Removed 3,692 sq. ft. of ground cover for turn pocket expansion. Area listed is the 50% Landscape Maintenance District No.4-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P330 • maintained by LMD 4R. An equal amount is maintained by the General Fund. VG-14 The Baseline median from Milliken to Ellena East. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Baseline from Ellena East to Ellena West. The turf and ground cover on the east side of Ellena West from Baseline and following the curb line to Kenyon. The north side of Ellena West from Kenyon to Casoli. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Casoli from Ellena West to Candela. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Crema Place from Ellena west to Candela. Ground Cover area: 9,169 square feet The total square footage for the Ground Cover improvements are 80,287, 62,999 square feet for Turf and 44,826 square feet for Hardscape; however, due to the location of the improvements, LMD 4-R maintains only the south side of the Base Line median from Milliken to Ellena East and the rest is maintained by LMD 2. VG-15 The turf and ground cover on the west side of Rochester from the Southern Pacific Railroad to Baseline. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Baseline from Rochester to Ellena East. The Baseline Median from Rochester to Ellena East. The turf and ground cover on the east side of Ellena east from Baseline and continuing along that curb line to 275 feet north of Berra Road. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Berra from Ellena East to Comiso. Ground Cover area: 3,960 square feet The total square footage for the Ground Cover improvements are 58,5887, 57,306 . square feet for Turf and 36,014 square feet for Hardscape; however, due to the location of the improvements, LMD 4-R maintains only the south side of the Base Line median from Rochester to Ellena East and the rest is maintained by LMD 2. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9T/StOZ JeaA leasid P331 bL eOuoweanj oyaued jo AID—H-17 'oN 13pTsia aaueuaauietAl adeDspuei 1 J 7 -... -1( H Z a II . a i ' _L i i "♦ [ -,. -a_,g. , ,,,, 2. , 0_, _, AV 2i31S3H�0 2!w i .. .- , — O O fi 6 LL 6 Y ∎ c U 8 [ ltd 1 I L-, , ga a _, Ia S _ _ LL « � ea-ill� r -1 A%t4 � F 1�44 O ® I I la I I 1 I m►n 1Ia I• V.. • 5ct1.. . III 44141 40 � z u. soh ip 111 It z in gj INi �mue= _ ��q } 1111 :fium / . s �►, `�,I,e ♦ ),-_�0. =c 11111 INI►�� ® ^,��a��� • il•: F 6' <> ----------------,k, u 0 44,6 ♦.. > ♦ a y 0 . O _ cu .„ AV N3N1111W N N N ,_ A ' a %. 4,G a O ' "' O' in z':::(X E m Hi w W 4 ,c-zal 16-1CX -(-L------- 0. a Y co O N - i co 5 .4' g a 0 ...s.vsip,t6 :...., ,,,,,,r(-,,:. . ,..t..,CO–J 1111)W ' \ h�' �„ C m. , Eli ^: o `y :C_ J N • y J O; pt= o z g �� ! o O rc hilt •• Inn do' o ,�� yZj� l,()onsli �� �, r ♦ .,. ` L.-1. 10 o+E e ^I t - l,�j� - g ■ 11WPw ; Yo..a a: s. 's:. - -1� ,"`� 4It. Ir ,',,• f��� - _o€�ga€fir_ oEa��E ] IIIII '. ► . r/ � ,` 1 / �` s e: ° ° ?°a qe� _ �=E aa' ' � ' ' 11 ; I o o Y a o € N 111111x11: . , vIy, „ , , E a� o j � n �ia�i�B4'.a3 ilt O O fi, , ' • AV N3AVH O o x P332 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2015/16 Budget Personnel Services Regular Payroll $ 616,180.00 Overtime Salaries 1,050.00 Part-time Salaries 32,280.00 Fringe Benefits 293.890.00 Subtotal Personnel $ 943,400.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $ 93,650.00 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 6,000.00 Emergency Equipment&Vehicle Rental 1,700.00 Equip Operations & Maint 3,750.00 Depreciation —Computer Equip 0.00 Contract Services 684,160.00 Tree Maintenance 71,400.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 3,420.00 Water Utilities 445,910.00 Electric Utilities 32,930.00 Assessment Administration 22,990.00 General Overhead 179.300.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $ 1,545,210.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Outlay— Equipment 0.00 Capital Outlay—Vehicles 0.00 Capital Outlay— Improvements Other Than Buildings 0.00 Capital Projects $ 392,000.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $ 392,000.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $ 2,880,610.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 2,823,880.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 19.460.00 Total Estimated Revenues $ 2,843,340.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 14,150.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 2,857,490.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 2,823,886.54 Total District EBU Count 6,917.72 Actual Assessment per EBU —Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 408.21 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 408.21 Landscape Maintenance District No.4-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P333 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved when the property owners on December 2, 2009, voted in favor of a Prop 218 assessment ballot increase with an allowable annual increase by the lesser of 3.5% or the percentage change in the year ending February preceding the start of the Fiscal Year of the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U) and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance ' information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2015 Reserve Fund Balance $ 3,138,184.00 Use of Operating Reserve Fund — Fiscal Year 2015/16 (37,270.00) Operating Reserve Contribution — Fiscal Year 2015/16 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2016 Reserve Fund Balance $ 3,124,034.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P334 Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities - Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities - Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P335 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D. all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. Landscape Maintenance District No.4-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P336 In this Assessment District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the Caryn Planned Community and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the Caryn Planned Community. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the Caryn Planned Community which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the Caryn Planned Community and proximate to the improvements and within the Assessment District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 19 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P337 derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire" costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1984, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined. On December 2, 2009 Proposition 218 assessment ballot increase was approved by the property owners in this district. Therefore, all parcels included in the District boundary, are being levied in accordance with Article XIII D and Proposition 218. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use}, and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land- use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Benefit Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Benefit Unit Condominium 0.80 Benefit Unit Multi-Family 0.70 Benefit Unit Commercial/Industrial 3.25 Acre Vacant (incl. all undeveloped property) 0.25 Acre Schools 0.25 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within, the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table reflects both the maximum allowable assessment and the actual assessment rates for each year since the formation of the district and the proposed assessment for Fiscal Year 2015/16 for the District: Fiscal Year Maximum Assessment per EBU Actual Assessment per EBU 2010/11 380.00 380.00 2011/12 388.64 380.00 • 2012/13 396.77 380.00 Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 20 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P338 2013/14 405.60 380.0 2014/15 407.81 391.40 2015/16 408.21 408.21 Property Type Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code) Assessment Rate Rate per EBU Units/Acres EBUs per EBU Single Family Residential $408.21 $408.21 2,652.00 2,652.00 Condominium $408.21 $408.21 1,395.00 1,116.00 Multi-Family _ $408.21 $408.21 3,641.00 _ 2,548.70 Commercial/Industrial $408.21 $408.21 176.28 572.91 Vacant $408.21 $408.21 77.06 19.26 Schools $408.21 $408.21 35.41 8.85 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Cost of Living Inflator Each fiscal year beginning Fiscal Year 2010/11, the maximum allowable assessment amount may be increased by the lesser of 3.5% or the percentage change in the year ending February preceding the start of the Fiscal Year of the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U), for the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County area. If for any reason the percentage change is negative the maximum allowable assessment would not be decreased by reason of such negative percentage change and would remain at the amount as computed on the previous fiscal year regardless of any CPI adjustment. The annual assessment cannot exceed the actual costs to operate the District in any given year. If operating costs are such that the maximum assessment amount is not needed, the City would levy only what is needed for that • year. The actual assessment rate for Fiscal Year 2015/16 will increase from $391.40 to $408.21 per single-family residence, a rate increase of 4.29% as compared to Fiscal Year 2014/15. • Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 21 Fiscal Year 2015/16 • P339 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 22 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9T/STOZ aeaA !e3s1j P340 H eSuoweDnj ogDueb 4o Al!O–H-V oN Puls!a aDueualu!ew adeDspue1 a) 4 E C1 N ifte Q'` :3 4 .y o O V 0 o in 0 li ny IJJay3 C ` m C i u) w m o 2 LL < .= I _.._.._.._.._.i ny lSe3 to- co 1 s I ! _ �, my epuer�u13 ny epuern!i3 CD i /.=I. IleIN 0 19 NaaJo ea = ny Jalsayooa • ny ialsayooa J r ~ I I -4\ Ay uaN!II!W c—._.._._._ , A, u.,,,,I!W i g g 1 g ny uaneH i ny uaneH i AV esounaH i 1 ny esouaja- i !4 1 Ay PIe9!Ll . im Ay PIe9!yoJt/ i e 1 ny ueuJI!aH i �-�t ny UewllaH I A L v I J/ ny pJeAau!A IS Uel!auJeD . i 10411;1141 4t r.. i I a) _..J"_ / +. + Ay anol° 1111111!141 CT N ogiii co ]F c' C m LPL Q .e�Sj �$ s{ m 1i i j p 41� ' , _ i .111111 ii1 eigiii :Iii P341 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2015/16 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2015/16 actual assessment for the District: Actual Actual Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable (County Use Code) per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $408.21 2,652.00 2,652.00 $1,082,572.92 Condominium $408.21 1,395.00 1,116.00 $455,562.36 Multi-Family $408.21 3,641.00 2,548.70 $1,040,404.82 Commercial/Industrial $408.21 176.28 572.91 $233,867.59 Vacant $408.21 77.06 19.26 $7,866.20 School $408.21 35.41 8.85 $3,612.65 TOTALS 7,976.75 6,917.72 $2,823,866.54 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2015/16 Fiscal Year. Landscape Maintenance District No.4-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 24 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P342 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2015/2016 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Andover) P343• CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 (ANDOVER) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tern William Alexander, Council Member Lynne B. Kennedy, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology Dean Rodia, Parks & Landscape Superintendent Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P344 TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Letter 1 Introduction 3 Reason for Assessment Process for Annual Assessment Plans and Specifications 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District Description of Improvements and Services Map of Improvements Estimate of Costs 7 District Budget Definitions of Budget Items Method of Assessment 10 • General General Benefit Special Benefit Method of Assessment Spread Assessment Diagram 13 Assessment Roll 15 Assessment Roll Annexations P345 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 15, 2015, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga, under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 15-119, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Andover) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2015/16 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels . within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. • SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2015/16 Total Estimated Assessment $ 2,460.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 780.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 3,240.00 • Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 8,680.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 11,920.00 Total District EBU Count 44.00 Actual Assessment per EBU _ $ 56.65 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $ 113.29 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P346 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirely of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefitted Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Annual Engineer's Report, Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. RoVESS/0,y4, `Q� koREWSl� 6y y " z No.C153672 70 s ES.6 !1 y 9 air``�� rata#°Q Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P347 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of water for the irrigation of landscaping, the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscaping or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a Landscape Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P348 written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, o opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold a community meeting with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If the is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P349 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City bounded by Hermosa Avenue on the west, 26"' Avenue on the south, the parcels north of and along Bedford Drive and the parcels west of and along Andover Place. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble-shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Andover Tot Lot. Site# Descriptive Location 1-1-5 The Andover playground on the southwest corner of Andover and Bedford. Ground Cover area: 1,506 square feet Turf area: 1,070 square feet Hardscape area: 640 square feet Andover and landscaping are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9I/SLOZ JeaA Heusi j P35O 9 eSuoWeunJ oipuea Jo kk!O—S •oN D!Is!a aDueualu!ew adeDspue1 a Z '<;;4: w z H W W 0._ J W w ZO ' Z 17 W 0 J X Q < V) X W I- —- — Y 0 O W U 0 3 ct a_ rx as _I 2 u_ as O ® lID N 0 a O ) Zt O°u_ +r v (1 .... O 1..r .y cx Q g o CD O CO• W a) o Co •� O Q e EL ` ° 1 ca V O y 1.0I a AV VSOWZI3H \ s `ss3•io e !t i Y � c a E 4 3"_f E V E s o s e 2 3•v °.s a.o F _ s• Z `s5• -_f +fig;Eoi2;fi Z!v^LEf'Ey!3Fy• L•.E± .1 E•4. :t y F 3 r i=:p 21"E E e- • .: 7 - QO PPg :so c V • �� a• ��gsT p Z: q:'Fiis<<rF�e£ges: P351 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2015/16 Budget Personnel Services Regular Payroll $ 1,770.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 830.00 Subtotal Personnel $ 2,600.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $ 1,400.00 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 70.00 Contract Services 6,390.00 Utilities Water Utilities 710.00 Electric Utilities 420.00 Assessment Administration 220.00 General Overhead 110.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $ 9,320.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Outlay— Improvements Other Than Buildings $ 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $ 0.00 • Total District Expenditure Budget $ 11,920.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 2,460.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquency 780.00 Total Estimated Revenues $ 3,240.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 8,680.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 11,920.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 2,492.60 Total District EBU Count 44.00 Actual Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 56.65 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 113.29 The maximum allowable.assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual Landscape Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P352 assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2015 Reserve Fund Balance $ 30,948.00 Use of Operating Reserve Fund — Fiscal Year 2015/16 (8,680.00) Operating Reserve Contribution — Fiscal Year 2015/16 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2016 Reserve Fund Balance $ 22,268.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time • employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities - Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P353 Utilities - Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P354 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D. all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P355 In this Assessment District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the Caryn Planned Community and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the Caryn Planned Community. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the Caryn Planned Community which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the Caryn Planned Community and proximate to the improvements and within the Assessment District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit • Landscape Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P356 derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1984, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent.passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined. On December 2, 2009 Proposition 218 assessment ballot increase was approved by the property owners in this district. Therefore, all parcels included in the District boundary, are being levied in accordance with Article XIII D and Proposition 218. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use}, and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land- use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units I Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier I • Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit 11 The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code) Assessment Rate Rate per EBU Units/Acres EBUs per EBU Single Family Residential $113.29 $56.65 44 44 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P357 The Fiscal Year 2015/16 actual assessment rate will remain at $56.65 per Single Family Residence. The City has reserve funds that are more than sufficient to cover an estimated six months' worth of maintenance and servicing costs for the District. When there are excess funds in the District's reserve account, the excess can be used to lower the annual levy to property owners within the District. The City will continue to annually review the estimated costs and expenses for the District as well as reserve fund levels, in order to determine if future levies can be reduced as well. • Landscape Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P358 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9T/STOZ JeaA lepsH P359 ST e8uoweanj oyauea jo Ally—S 'oN A!Jls!O aoueualu!e!n! adeaspuej ILO 2 INS Ein a� I g O >41 J J c C V 2 n V ,,I ___ Ay IOnein Cl o $ d �� ,, v J o CI = ? I )1/41/4, a 8 I.. L 3 /� 1D O _ __ \\ IL Q e—tee..�.._.�i n y Ise .c 3 r jAV epuemjj — -T AV epuenn!13 Ci3 I-!_ — -- ---- -- Lai y a g �aai0 A p r AN/Ja!sayooa I - - --- J H— —of—� _--a_ Ay ua�!!II!W , ny ua)l!II!W I , AV UBABH - ---.- -�y — AV USABH . AV esowuaH —,�° 1 . ny esouuOH AV PIeq!4oJ J f .— ny PIeQ!4olt/ ny UBW!la!! ___ 1 1 A uewllaH � Q / !!Ay pleAau!n IS uegaweo —P I— I __ m —+ AV OAOJ9 65 g1f1 v c 1)4111r 1:1 N Ci 1g111' 2•!21 I14flli44ia • G fa: 1! 1111 P360 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2015/16 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum and actual assessments for the District: - Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable (County Use Code) per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $113.29 44 44 $4,984.76 Actual Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Actual (County Use Code) per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $56.65 44 44 $2,492.60 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no Annexations effective for the 2015/16 Fiscal Year. • Landscape Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P361 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2015/2016 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R (Caryn Planned Community) 9 P362 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6-R (CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY) • 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tern William Alexander, Council Member Lynne B. Kennedy, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology Dean Rodia, Parks & Landscape Superintendent Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P363 TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Letter 1 Introduction 3 Reason for Assessment Process for Annual Assessment Plans and Specifications 6 Description of the Boundaries of the District Description of Improvements and Services Map of Improvements Estimate of Costs 23 District Budget Definitions of Budget Items Method of Assessment 26 General General Benefit Special Benefit Method of Assessment Spread Assessment Diagram 30 Assessment Roll 32 Assessment Roll Annexations P364 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July, 15, 2015, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga, under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 15-119, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R (Caryn Planned Community) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2015/16 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2015/16 Total Estimated Assessment $470,610.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 16.780.00 Total Estimated Revenue $487,390.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 26,470.00 Total Expenditure Budget $513,860.00 Total District EBU Count 1,196.98 Actual Assessment per EBU $393.17 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $393.17 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P365 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirely of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefitted Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Annual Engineer's Report, Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order OFESS/of p the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. No.CO63672 cc t} Ex/' 7 4 atN- Mark A. euer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P366 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P367 written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, o opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold a community meeting with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If the is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P368 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area located north of the 1-210 Freeway, south of Banyan Street, west of Rochester Avenue and east of Milliken Avenue, also known as the Caryn Planned Community. The boundaries also include Tract No. 13835 east of Rochester Avenue and Tracts No. 13748, 13857 & 13858 west of Milliken Avenue. Zone 1 is the area generally located west of Rochester Avenue and east of Milliken Avenue. Zone 2 is the area generally located east of Rochester Avenue and west of Milliken Avenue. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements maintained by the District include the paseos, community trails, trees, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the Caryn Planned Community. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble-shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site# Descriptive Location CC-1 The southside of Banyan St from 1290 feet west of Milliken to Milliken. The west side of Milliken & median from Banyan St to 292 south of Vintage Dr. Ground Cover area: 96,892 square feet Turf area: 17,945 square feet Hardscape area: 13,944 square feet CC-3 The paseo on the west side of Morning PI form Morning PI to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,801 square feet Turf area: 124 square feet Hardscape area: 4,609 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P369 CC-4 The west side of Morning PI, from Banyan St to Starview Pl. The north side of Starview PI, from Morning PI to Star View Ct. Ground Cover area: 14,273 square feet Turf Cover area: 5,513 square feet Hardscape area: 5,000 square feet CC-5 Silver Sun paseo from the end of Silver Sun cul-de-sac to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 25,890 square feet Turf area: 12,084 square feet Hardscape area: 1,350 square feet CC-6 The east and west side of Netherlands View Loop from Vintage Dr. to Vintage Dr. The Netherlands View loop paseo from Netherlands View Loop to Mt Sterling Ct. Ground Cover area: 88,902 square feet Turf area: 676 square feet Hardscape area: 23,650 square feet CC-7 The east and west side of Hillview Loop from Mt. Rainer Ct to Kettle Peak. Ground Cover area: 14,930 square feet Turf area: 6,318 square feet Hardscape area: 12,236 square feet CC-8 The paseo from Hillview Loop to Vintage Dr. Ground Cover area: 42,107 square feet Hardscape area: 22,752 square feet Hardscape area: 4,089 square feet CC-9 The south side of Vintage Dr. from 250 feet west of Hillview Loop to Hillview Loop. The west side of Hillview Loop from Vintage Dr. to Kettle Peak. The west side of Kettle Peak from Hillview Loop to Donner Pass Ct. The east side of Hillview Loop from Kettle Peak to Tioga Peak. Ground Cover area: 47,334 square feet Turf area: 4,954 square feet Hardscape area: 9,088 square feet CC-10 The east side of Terrace View Loop from Vintage Dr. to Butler Peak. The west side of Terrace View Loop from Rainbow Falls Ct. Vintage Dr. Ground Cover area: 24,603 square feet Hardscape area: 10,760 square feet CC-11 The paseo from Caryn School to Banyan St. The south side of Banyan St from the paseo to Rochester Ave. The east and west side of Mt. Baldy Ct from Banyan St to Sierra Crest View Loop. The north side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Hilltop Ct. to Woodland Ct. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P370 Ground Cover area: 47,507 square feet Turf area: 7,810 square feet Hardscape area: 7,825 square feet CC-12 The Separation Paseo from Vintage Dr. to Pinnacle Peak. Ground Cover area: 50,325 square feet Turf area: 15,021 square feet Hardscape area: 7,675 square feet CC-13 The east side of Hillview Loop from Tioga Peak Ct to Vintage Dr. The south side of Vintage Dr. from Hillview Loop to Terrace View Loop. The north side of Vintage Dr. from Hillview Loop to Caryn School. The east side of Terrace View Loop from Vintage Dr. to Mt San Antonio Ct. Ground Cover area: 26,162 square feet Turf area: 4,508 square feet Hardscape area: 12,928 square feet CC-14 The east side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Mt. Waverly to Vintage Dr. The north side of Vintage Dr. from Sierra Crest View Loop to Sierra Crest View Loop. The east and west side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Vintage Dr. to Mt. Wilson Ct. The south side of Vintage Dr. from Netherlands View Loop to 330 feet west of Netherlands View Loop. Ground Cover area: 73,250 square feet Turf area: 16,525 square feet Hardscape area: 9,885 square feet CC-15 The south side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Mt. Waverly Ct. to Mt. Cambridge Ct. The north side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Mt. Cambridge Ct. to Woodland Ct. The north side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Hilltop Ct. to Caryn School. The Sierra Crest view Loop paseo from Sierra Crest View Loop to Mt. Sherman Ct. Ground Cover area: 70,990 square feet Turf area: 7,699 square feet Hardscape area: 20,055 square feet CC-16 The south side of Vintage Dr. from Netherlands View Loop to Rochester Ave. The north side of Vintage Dr. from Rochester Ave. to Sierra Crest View Loop. The east and west side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Mt. Wilson Ct. to Mt. Cambridge Ct. The Netherlands View Loop Paseo from Vintage Dr. to Mt. Sterling Ct. Ground Cover area: 77,202 square feet Turf area: 3,954 square feet Hardscape area: 18,195 square feet CC-17 The east side of Milliken Ave. from Vintage Dr. to Banyan St. Ground Cover area: 13,740 square feet Turf area: 9,088 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P371 Hardscape area: 6,460 square feet CC-18 The north side of Vintage Dr. from Milliken Ave. to Hillview Loop. The south side of Vintage Dr. from 104 feet west of Hillview Loop to Milliken Ave. Ground Cover area: 32,287 square feet Turf area: 3,889 square feet Hardscape area: 11,188 square feet CC-19 The Terrace View Loop paseo from Vintage Dr. to Terrace View Loop. Ground Cover area: 17,469 square feet Turf area: 15,617 square feet Hardscape area: 2,736 square feet CC-20 The east side of Terrace View Loop from Mt. San Antonio Ct. to El Capitan Ct. The west side of Terrace View Loop from Butler Peak PI. to Mt. San Antonio Ct. Ground Cover area: 20,627 square feet Hardscape area: 20,017 square feet Hardscape area: 7,888 square feet CC-21 The west side of Rochester from Banyan to 317 feet south of Vintage Dr. Ground Cover area: 31,292 square feet CC-22 The south side of Vintage Dr. from Terrace View Loop to Sierra Crest View Loop. The east and west side of Hillview Loop from Vintage Dr. to Mt. Rainer Ct. Ground Cover area: 11,609 square feet Turf area: 3,763 square feet Hardscape area: 6,524 square feet • CC-23 The south side of Banyan from Milliken to Butler Peak PI. The west side of Butler Peak Pl. from Banyan St. to Terrace View Loop. The north side of Terrace View Loop from Butler Peak Pl. to Rainbow Falls Ct. Ground Cover area: 12,132 square feet Hardscape area: 528 square feet CC-24 The north side of Terrace View Loop from El Capitan Ct. to Butler Peak PI. The east side of Butler Peak Pl. from Terrace View Loop to Banyan St. The south side of Banyan St. from Butler Peak Pl. to 990 feet east of Butler Peak PI. Ground Cover area: 14,452 square feet Hardscape area: 1,600 square feet CC-26 The east side of Rochester from 210 freeway to Vintage Dr. The north and south side of Vintage from Rochester to Thunder Mountain Ct. The west side of Rochester from 317 feet south of Vintage Dr. to the 210 freeway. Ground Cover area: 35,037 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P372 Hardscape area: 19,779 square feet CC-27 The Milliken median and the west side of Milliken from 292 feet south of Vintage to 210 freeway. Ground Cover area: 13,365 square feet Hardscape area: 12,300 square feet CC-28 The east side of Milliken from Vintage to the 210 freeway right-of-way. Ground Cover area: 17,724 square feet Cobble area: 2,387 square feet Hardscape area: 8,197 square feet Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9i/STOZ ma), leDsH P373 OZ eSuoweonj oypueb 40 A ij—1:1-9 •oN 1pialslp @Dueua}uieIA adeospuei a Z z ~ W a J W H W W O O 2 _1 w U '� o O= ,D 0 O0 W ix a u_ 0. Li__L 1 ..Ali 2 31�S3H�ON w I I if O n i m ,.l" 11:1 ,,, __ Jirii r V�L`.}- i - "—s.' LLl La r-J - J z . ,T--, U co ♦-+ i �O " �f ._ 1N1 �1� �� o cv ...,_1 a a- 0 ( 1. - CO W N ±l 4+ _ !t_ : :-', o V N .0 V ` `I N \ 1l•O v N. `- �_. a �� irk N.ct., .6,ET. E,I, w c.) i L 15.3 /re r (,) � � r -44.ems^ <> —I __---1-1, 0- 47 ILO a) -- c.., c...: Ty : .: CO 0 ,_,,,p---4 (._ ,. : U U O N i O l ,_ .1 . , r 1 �T Ttf CU II J ' � ) � diN35lllIINis <> G.. 4j11Iflfflujll==" �3 m Ilk E N 1�r— �--- m: CC fl m ° _ 5 R � ° c y a E_ _ 11 ac ° N N -g ° - � i {t om Q m m ..� r 1 _ ? � QZ- ° N c ° m E` N , rgoer co.oA T, R D m p_ R 8 q m. N z / o =0,, mam= m � \�-- U O & o �R Rc- =g o 4 w .N- i" Ia U sgo,QR 1mEaa21n� Q R V C m R 7 T C a I __.I U IIIIHIIIIUI!IIII 1 rjj FT-1 H_:i • • L N Qfi-U. .-A i L U F T R P374 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2015/16 Budget • Personnel Services Regular Payroll $ 11,950.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 5.480.00 Subtotal Personnel $ 17,430.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $ 16,360.00 Emergency Equipment & Vehicle Rental 200.00 Contract Services 229,690.00 Tree Maintenance 35,700.00 Utilities Water Utilities 175,970.00 Electric Utilities 8,730.00 Assessment Administration 7,020.00 General Overhead 23,840.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $ 497,510.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects $ 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $ 0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $ 514,940.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 470,610.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 16,780.00 Total Estimated Revenues $ 487,390.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 26,470.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 513,860.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 470,616.61 Total District EBU Count 1,196.98 Actual Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 393.17 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 393.17 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved when the property owners on December 2, 2009, voted in favor of a Prop 218 assessment ballot increase with an allowable annual increase by the lesser of 3.0% or the Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P375 percentage change in the year ending February preceding the start of the Fiscal Year of the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U) and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2015 Reserve Fund Balance $ 174,068.00 Use of Operating Reserve Fund — Fiscal Year 2015/16 (26,470.00) Operating Reserve Contribution — Fiscal Year 2015/16 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2016 Reserve Fund Balance $ 147,598.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P376 Utilities - Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities - Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Proiects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P377 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D. all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P378 In this Assessment District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the Caryn Planned Community and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the Caryn Planned Community. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the Caryn Planned Community which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the Caryn Planned Community and proximate to the improvements and within the Assessment District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P379 derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. Vacant parcels are assigned an EBU value of 0.25 EBU's per acre because they receive a lesser benefit from the improvements until such time as development occurs. Publicly owned school parcels are also assigned an EBU value of 0.25 EBU's per acre in recognition of the limited benefit they receive from the improvements which are provided for the use and benefit of the residential units within the District, and the benefit conferred upon other parcels within the District by the open space and landscaping maintained by the School District on their parcels which might be used by properties within the District under joint use agreements between the School District and the City. There are two benefit zones within the District: Zone 1 and Zone 2. Parcels in Zone 2 are assigned 0.75 EBU per dwelling unit due to the reduction in special benefit they receive as a result of their location relative to the majority of the improvements maintained by the District. Zone 2 parcels are on the far east and west side of the District. Therefore, parcels within Zone 2 do not receive the same special benefit from the improvements due to their proximity, as parcels within Zone lwhich are assigned 1.00 EBU per dwelling unit and are generally located adjacent to or in close proximity to the improvements. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units • Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential —Zone 1 1.00 Dwelling Unit Single Family Residential —Zone 2 0.75 Dwelling Unit School 0.25 Acre or portion thereof Vacant 0.25 Acre or portion thereof The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels Will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P380 Fiscal Year Maximum Assessment per EBU Actual Assessment per EBU 2010/11 366.00 246.97 2011/12 374.32 366.00 • 2012/13 382.15 373.66 2013/14 390.65 381.96 2014/15 392.78 389.96 2015/16 393.17 393.17 Maximum Actual Property Type Allowable Assessment Rate Total Total (County Use Code) Assessment per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Rate per EBU Single Family Residential -Zone 1 $393.17 $393.17 963.00 963.00 Single Family Residential -Zone 2 $393.17 $393.17 310.00 232.50 School $393.17 $393.17 5.35 1.34 Vacant $393.17 $393.17 0.54 0.14 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Cost of Living Inflator Each fiscal year beginning Fiscal Year 2010/11, the maximum allowable assessment amount may be increased by the lesser of 3.0% or the percentage change in the year ending February preceding the start of the Fiscal Year of the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U), for the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County area. If for any reason the percentage change is negative the maximum allowable assessment would not be decreased by reason of such negative percentage change and would remain at the amount as computed on the • previous fiscal year regardless of any CPI adjustment. The annual assessment cannot exceed the actual costs to operate the District in any given year. If operating costs are such that the maximum assessment amount is not needed, the City would levy only what is needed for that year. The actual assessment rate for Fiscal Year 2015/16 will increase from $389.96 to $393.17 per single-family residence Zone 1 and from $292.47 to $294.87 per single family residence Zone 2, a CPI increase of 0.82% as compared to Fiscal Year 2014/15. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R-City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P381 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. • Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9ti/STOZ Jea) leas!J P382 61 e2uowejnj otpuea Jo A j— I-9 •oN ppis!d ameuaw!ew adenspuei N Cll .1,r 1 V N 11110 Q "1-3 C (1) 0 ! i.(;). C >, O c c V n IGJ9 C U re N N o co I—Li 0 g 8 a; .6.r. 2 Q ...).‘ viipi, C i m Q) LE r.. ! < r..�..�w�w�wwy •� Iny 3Se3 tij /Ay epuexuq3 ny epuemn3 CD 1 J :1 CO 1 I 4 � !18 >aaao tea._.._ I ) = ny ia;sayoo� ' • Ay Ja;sayao { CO us& I Ay ua)!II!W j —'—' ny uam!II!W i I ilir ny uaneH 1 i Hny uaneH i ny esouaieH o ny eSOWJaH I T. • l AV PIeq!u3JV ; J ny Pleq4tl� ny uewIlaH ! 1 ny uewllaH ! ny l� p au!n 3S ue!laUJe3 ! i' €'i I .lf `g ----` .._rte. �; ny anoa0 ;ti r e 2 r t g l `---n— —w..rr �. N .... 65 r Elf Ya 1 r!! e cc c m ti_ Q tjtifa ii!i IC . Day to (C [142111i5![142 11115 ! CO iY 9Rg la . =•iiii ii$ �t; iia Lf :p . P383 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2015/16 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2015/16 actual assessment for the District: Actual Actual Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Assessment (County Use Code) per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Single Family Residential $393.17 963.00 963.00 $378,622.71 —Zone 1 Single Family Residential $393.17 310.00 232.50 $91,412.02 —Zone 2 School $393.17 5.35 1.34 $526.84 Vacant $393.17 0.54 0.14 $55.04 TOTALS $393.17 1,278.89 1,196.973 $470,616.61 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations for the 2015/16 Fiscal Year. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R—City of Rancho Cucamonga 20 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P384 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2015/2016 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) P385 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Lynne B. Kennedy, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology Dean Rodia, Parks & Landscape Superintendent Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P386 TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Letter 1 , Introduction 3 Reason for Assessment Process for Annual Assessment Plans and Specifications 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District Description of Improvements and Services Map of Improvements Estimate of Costs 12 District Budget Definitions of Budget Items Method of Assessment 15 General General Benefit Special Benefit Method of Assessment Spread Assessment Diagram 18 Assessment Roll 20 Assessment Roll Annexations P387 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 15, 2015 the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga, under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 15-119, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2015/16 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2015/16 Total Estimated Assessment $ 911,630.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 33,370.00 Plus Transfer In-Fund 868 50,000.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 995,000.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 2.260.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 997,260.00 Total District EBU Count 2,969.00 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 307.05 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $ 307.05 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said Landscape Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P388 parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirely of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefitted Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Annual Engineer's Report, Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. ii0�OFESSip omEWs5,„. ..t ti-s No.COS3872 1 ; &"\*`'S� - I�' Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P389 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a Landscape Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P390 written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, o opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold a community meeting with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. • During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If the is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P391 • PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City known as North Etiwanda, which is generally bounded by the 210 Freeway on the south, 1-15 Freeway on the west, and City limits on the north. Typically, parcels have been annexed to the District as they have been developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of the paseos, parkways, median islands, street trees, parks, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the North Etiwanda. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines; ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble-shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Etiwanda Creek Park. Site # Descriptive Location EN-1 The north side of Wilson from San Sevaine to Ridgeline. The east side of Ridgeline from Wilson to Arcadia Way. Ground Cover area: 27,325 square feet Turf area: 19,334 square feet Hardscape area: 840 square feet EN-2 The Metropolitan Water District easement on the south side of Crescenta Way from San Marino to Ridgeline Place. Ground Cover area: 38,104 square feet Turf area: 41,250 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P392 Hardscape area: 9,000 square feet EN-3 The Wilson Av. median from Wardman Bullock Rd. to San Sevaine Avenue. Ground Cover area: 9,016 square feet Hardscape area: 11,088 square feet EN-4 The Planters on the north side of the drainage easement that is between and parallel to Highland and Arapaho Rd. from Etiwanda Ave east to the end. Ground Cover area: 63,972 square feet EN-5 The south side of Wilson Av. from 1,115 feet west of San Sevaine Av. to 205 feet east of San Sevaine Avenue. The east side of San Sevaine Av from Wilson Av. to Youngs Canyon Road. Ground Cover area: 45,584 square feet Turf area: 3,527 square feet EN-6 The north side of Wilson from Wardman Bullock Rd. to Ridgeline Place. The west side of Ridgeline PI. from Wilson Av. to 120 feet north of Arcadia Way. Ground Cover area: 29,226 square feet Turf area: 15,136 square feet Hardscape area: 1,300 square feet EN-7 The parkway on the eastside of Wardman Bullock from Wilson Av. to 857 feet north of Glendora Court. The cobblestone between the tract wall and the flood wall will be handled as extra for debris pickup and weed control on an as needed basis. Ground Cover area: 10,268 square feet Hardscape area: 31,549 square feet EN-8 The south side of Crescenta Way from Ridgeline Pl. to Crestline Place. Ground Cover area: 50,035 square feet Turf area: 35,960 square feet Hardscape area: 10,000 square feet EN-9 The paseo from Meadow Brook to Rock Creek Road. Ground Cover area: 1,400 square feet Turf area: 6,555 square feet Hardscape area: 2,820 square feet EN-10 The paseo from Etiwanda to Pacific Crest Place. The west side of Etiwanda from 175 • feet north of North Rim Way to 171 feet south of Golden Prairie Drive. Ground Cover area: 49,020 square feet Turf area: 4,445 square feet Hardscape area: 13,026 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P393 EN-11 The paseo south of Ridge Crest Drive to southern boundary of Tract 14139. This site is temporarily maintained by another contractor and was deleted from the contract as of 7-16-01 however this site is still the city's property. Ground Cover area: 3,548 square feet Turf area: 800 square feet Hardscape area: 4,280 square feet • EN-12 The cul-de-sac on the north side of Ridgecrest PI. at Etiwanda Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 1,870 square feet Turf area: 700 square feet Hardscape area: 450 square feet EN-13• The north side of Wilson Av. from 574 feet west of Cherry Av. to the channel east of San Sevaine Road. The Wilson Av. median from Cherry Av. to San Sevaine Road. The east side of San Sevaine from Wilson to 136 feet north of Crescenta. Ground Cover area: 46,611 square feet Turf area: 5,037 square feet EN-14 The west side of San Sevaine Av. from 150 feet north of Wilson to 136 feet north of Crescenta Way. Ground Cover area: 55,166 square feet Turf area: 235 square feet Hardscape area: 6,975 square feet EN-15 The north side of Youngs Canyon Road from 500 feet east of Koch to 692 feet west of Koch. The south side of Youngs Canyon Road from 349 feet east of Koch to 692 feet west of Koch. The east and west side of Koch place from Youngs Canyon Road to 132 feet north of Youngs Canyon Road. The west side of Koch from Youngs Canyon Road to 132 feet south of Youngs Canyon Road. The east side of Koch from 82 feet south of Youngs Canyon Road to Youngs Canyon Road. The trailhead north east of the east end of Youngs Canyon Road to the south end of San Sevaine Horse Trail. The south end of San Sevaine Horse from the trail head to 254 feet north of trailhead. Ground Cover area: 42,925 square feet Hardscape area: 14,308 square feet EN-16 The east side of Wardman Bullock from 225 feet south of San Segundo Drive to 80 feet north of Dona Way. Ground Cover area: 2,056 square feet Hardscape area: 3,450 square feet EN-17 The north side of Colonbero from San Sevaine Channel to Guidera Drive. The south side of Colonbero from San Sevaine Channel to 400 feet north of Guidera Drive. The north side of Aggazzotti from Colonbero to 4 75 feet east of Colonbero. This site has a pump which will be adjusted and maintained by city personnel. Ground Cover area: 43,241 square feet Hardscape area: 29,125 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P394 EN-18 The north side of Aggazzotti Road from San Antonio Drive to San Sevaine Road. The west side of San Sevaine road from Aggazzotti to 702 feet south of Aggazzotti. The East side of San Sevaine Road from 702 feet south of Aggazzotti to Regina. Ground Cover area: 47,823 square feet Hardscape area: 30,986 square feet EN-19 The south side of Wilson from Etiwanda to Estates Way. Ground Cover area: 45,727 square feet Hardscape area: 19,229 square feet EN-20 The south side of Wilson Avenue form Bluegrass Avenue to Estates Way. Ground Cover area: 85,155 square feet Hardscape area: 48,784 square feet EN-21 The north side of Wilson from Etiwanda to Cervantes. The Wilson median from Etiwanda to Cervantes. The Westside of Etiwanda from Wilson to Del Norte Place. Ground Cover area: 88,795 square feet Hardscape area: 27,128 square feet EN-22 The north and south side of Vintage from 165 feet east of Country View to 338 feet west of Country View. Ground Cover area: 13,603 square feet Hardscape area: 7,365 square feet EN-23 The north side of Wilson and median from Etiwanda west to Etiwanda. The east side of Etiwanda from Wilson to 1150 feet north of Wilson. Ground Cover area: 32,027 square feet Hardscape area: 29,567 square feet EN-24 The north side of Vintage from 360 feet west of Ascot to 230 feet east of Countrywood. The south side of Vintage from Ascot PI. to 500 feet east of Countrywood. Ground Cover area: 34,707 square feet Hardscape area: 92,600 square feet EN-25 The east side of Bluegrass from Banyan to 610 feet north of Banyan. Ground Cover area: 4,054 square feet Hardscape area: 5,819 square feet EN-26 The south side of Banyan from Bluegrass to Greenwood. Ground Cover area: 6,240 square feet Hardscape area: 3,200 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P395 EN-27 The south side of Banyan from Laurel Blossom to Etiwanda. Ground Cover area: 1,703 square feet Hardscape area: 8,417 square feet EN-28 The north side of Wilson from Cervantes to 1715 feet west of Cervantes. The west side of Cervantes from Carmel Knolls Drive to Wilson. The paseo from Wilson to Tejas Ct. The median on Wilson from Cervantes to Bluegrass. The following temporary landscape: There is 1 planter on the west side of Altura at Tejas. There are five planters on the south side of Tejas from Altura to 195 feet east of Altura. Ground Cover area: 25,048 square feet Hardscape area: 22,532 square feet EN-29 The south side of Banyan from 787 feet west of East Av. to East Av. The west side of East Avenue from Banyan to 600 feet south of Blue Gum. The east side of East Ave. from Banyan to 537 feet south of Banyan. Ground Cover area: 16,111 square feet Hardscape area: 15,774 square feet EN-30 The east side of Bluegrass Ave from 257 feet south of Churchill Drive to 418 feet north of Churchill Drive. Ground Cover area: 9,303 square feet Hardscape area: 5,302 square feet EN-31 The south side of Banyan Ave. from 375 feet south of Cashew Way to Rose Way. The north side of Banyan Ave. from 435 feet west of Peak PI. to Wardman Bullock Rd. Ground Cover area: 53,000 square feet Hardscape area: 26,855 square feet EN-32 The landscaping south of the equestrian trail from 210 feet west of Grovewood Pl. to 1,170 feet east of Grovewood PI. Ground Cover area: 6,900 square feet EN-33 The north side of Youngs Canyon Rd. from 600 feet east of Banyan Ave. to Banyan Ave. The east side of Ward man Bullock Rd. from Banyan Ave. to Wilson Ave. The south side of Wilson Ave. from Wardman Bullock Rd. to 635 feet east of Fields PI. Ground Cover area: 66,601 square feet Hardscape area: 46,332 square feet EN-34 The west side of Wardman Bullock Rd. from Wilson Ave. to Banyan Ave. Parkview Way from Wardman Bullock Rd. to Soledad Way. Ground Cover area: 56,314 square feet Hardscape area: 28,428 square feet EN-35 The north side of Day Creek Blvd. from Etiwanda Ave. to Indian Wells Place. Ground Cover area: 160,737 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P396 Hardscape area: 128,254 square feet EN-36 The south side of Day Creek from 380 feet north of Coyote to Etiwanda. The west side of Etiwanda from Day Creek to 170 feet north of North Rim. The west side of Day Creek from 380 feet north of Coyote to Indian Wells. Ground Cover area: 58,398 square feet Hardscape area: 68,127 square feet EN-37 The east side of East Ave. from 235 feet south of Hunt Club Dr. to 375 feet north of Hunt Club Dr. Ground Cover area: 5,559 square feet Hardscape area: 5,231 square feet • EN-38 The west side of East Ave. from 236 feet north of Philly Dr. to 245 feet south of Philly Dr. Ground Cover area: 4,605 square feet Hardscape area: 3,394 square feet EN-39 The south side of Banyan form Golden Lock Pl. to Raindrop PI. Ground Cover area: 6,024 square feet Hardscape area: 330 square feet Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. • Landscape Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9T/STOZ JeaA lepsIj P397 IT eSuoweanj oipueb 4o ATIO—L .oN p!JTs!G aJueualuleLN ade3spuei Z O O, a ill H W d -Ti W /- Z Z re y.. — i N a N cc w 0 s�i W O C9 r O W 0 D W ft W a 3 ce a Ce _1 2 u_ a sz, iib I . , /1V n!JUJn�J r M • W co Z w � W li am. O ,vwJ Z * w \ •` I Z W W W W CI W as yaollne NvuuoavM 4 z W _ w W uul 0 �S auui. nit• ��I,ruin II u[. ■ `Y a C C•..0 ._ ��_� ���D O am 111.141= 0 lei 0) l 111%►�� .__. M• ill 11111f11 -U F-' ,I, r If111U1 0 �■ II11I111 "•` � w ' � 1111U11 O/� ?Q a Q n 1111f111�. z ( AV 1SV3 Q . -§—' wIll i/ �i : w 6. 0+a ma, T T ci f *MI LLILV►�� •� T T ' •P,...r 1 ♦ O y . N V [2 1. AV w /1d d4NVM113 w AV tlONdM113 � — /V w ■w 7. 1 ` 4IiI 4 r g zm I I1 111 y ►�:'= IL w �- C'• • 1 'Q-11.- (`'1 111.1 w �"I. ;r a' . WL I Z .,4.t7 i-1 I, n t` +��:ii[s�=ue �i�qi:"`• •Ni p ;`. wl4i• I, W g;i W ii ilm-4 ['. F 6 1 r1 IV y. Xial :v �i� aka Ibl:a_;z-• 110,2 ���p`,4 ,- �Q ' siae■gYoad r vim. 4. <- ] y[!a '°a• as pli . 4�:�'p•, tr�- 19N3180A` G ' Q i? :!1�.E' 4e ..._�� _��.All `;".m' ,J:= = '- ��LLL., p' urff.•.aZ-.1,-:�Cy ,.-,rye{"(t/'{T/.j. t6■111' 1 C• _.• 1� { FF Z Bi,;,_f.c...p.2 i,i.,.Y � ` IJIIIII\ • '►�h1t.►:11►Fi►'� '.uu\[ to 9-, tElL f,.s,12,;gi �+r� i �?x1�,f 1-•11.5 P398 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2015/16 Budget Personnel Services Regular Payroll $ 117,680.00 Part-time Salaries 13,160.00 Fringe Benefits 57.120.00 Subtotal Personnel $ 187,960.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $ 33,400.00 Operations and Maintenance Facilities 1,000.00 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 0.00 Emergency Equipment &Vehicle Rental 0.00 Contract Services 297,940.00 Tree Maintenance 7,090.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 1,310.00 Water Utilities 351,220.00 Electric Utilities 32,130.00 Assessment Administration 15,430.00 General Overhead 72,200.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $ 811,720.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Outlay— Equipment $ 0.00 Capital Proiects 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $ 0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $ 999,680.00 Total Estimated Assessment , $ 911,630.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 33,370.00 Plus Transfer In-Fund 868 50,000.00 Total Estimated Revenues $ 995,000.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 2,260.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 997,260.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 911,631.45 Total District EBU Count 2,969.00 Actual Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 307.05 Landscape Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P399 I Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 I $ 307.05 I The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2015 Reserve Fund Balance $ 696,554.00 Use of Operating Reserve Fund — Fiscal Year 2015/16 (2,260.00) Operating Reserve Contribution — Fiscal Year 2015/16 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2016 Reserve Fund Balance $ 694,294.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P400 Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities - Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities - Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P401 • METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D. all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P4O2 In this Assessment District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of • local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the Caryn Planned Community and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the Caryn Planned Community. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the Caryn Planned Community which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the Caryn Planned Community and proximate to the improvements and within the Assessment District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit Landscape Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P4O3 derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1989, Article XIID and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIID and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. Vacant parcels are assigned an EBU value of 0.25 per acre because they receive a lesser benefit from the improvements until such time as development occurs. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units IProperty Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code) Assessment Rate Rate per EBU Units/Acres EBUs per EBU I Single Family Residential $307.05 $307.05 2,969 2,969 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P404 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2015/16 91/StOZ JeaA leas!I P405 61 eSuoweanJ oyuuea 4o Alp-L 'oN ppis!d a3ueu awl e[Ai ade3spuei N. N _v 11M R ,n v .i _ w •y J o 53 c CY V jit Ay AnoLIO CD '� o #C N m cc N to /0 _ 8 w m m - w 3 �� co O 0 RI ■ . Q _••..._.._.._..---i Ay isej u6 I__r. Q i AV epuem I 1 43 �+ V I .Y.) J Ay iaisayooa Ay JaisayooH AV ua)!II!W r--.._.._.._._.? I Ay ua11II!W I ri I 1 I I t} I Ay uaneH I I I IAy uaneH I )1 Ay eSOW1OH I i :Ay esowiaH i 1, Ay Ple9!43'y i I Ay Ple911-10J`d i i Ay uewpaH 1 -Ay uewllaH L cD 1 Ay pienau!A iS ueyawe3 i I ;, i g ¢ Ejjgg. RR t .._.._ -/—Y.._.�__.._.._, Ay anoio lilt i ig Q J m Q' C �'t �b sf; • t r.� .._-�_.._._..r..- 8i s o 00 iY�a��1ie ei o m Q 1111!;11111 111 or c 0 ill 1110.1 co 010 ‘..••• _. : lztl• s tilai;t .tl P406 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2015/16 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable (County Use Code) per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $307.05 2,969 2,969 $911,631.45 *"Actual Assessment Rate per EBU" is the same as "Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate Per EBU". A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following Annexation is effective for the 2015/16 Fiscal Year. APN Annexation Project Total Total Property Type Date Name Units/Acres EBUS 0226-081-06 02/05/14 TR 18741 53.00 53.00 Single Family Residential 0225-191-03, 04/16/14 TR 18122 76.00 76.00 Single Family 04, 13, 15 & 20 Residential 0225-381-06 11/05/14 TR 18034 7.00 7.00 Single Family Residential Landscape Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 20 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P407 Annual Engineering Report Fiscal Year 2015/2016 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) P4O8 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Lynne B. Kennedy, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology Dean Rodia, Parks & Landscape Superintendent Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P409 TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Letter 1 Introduction 3 Reason for Assessment Process for Annual Assessment Plans and Specifications 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District Description of Improvements and Services Map of Improvements Estimate of Costs 8 District Budget Definitions of Budget Items Method of Assessment 11 General General Benefit Special Benefit Method of Assessment Spread Assessment Diagram 14 Assessment Roll 16 Assessment Roll Annexations P41O ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 15, 2015, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga, under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 15-119, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2015/16 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2015/16 Total Estimated Assessment $ 32,740.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies _ 670.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 33,410:00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 9.200.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 42,610.00 Total District EBU Count 216.22 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 151.45 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $ 151.45 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P411 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirely of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefitted Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report t and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Annual Engineer's Report, Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. 01,0FESS/0,y9 „<<, A ,NOREWgGFy�y� s No.0059872 7r rd; Exp.:6�30•� ? Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P412 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a Landscape Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2015/16 • P413 written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, o opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold a community meeting with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If the is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P414 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area known as South Etiwanda, which is south of the 1-210 Freeway along Fisher Drive, east of East Avenue, including the south side of Highstone Manor Court, the south side of Smokestone Street, and to the San Bernardino County Flood Control drainage basin on east side. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have been developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements maintained by the District include the paseos, community trails, trees, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the District. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble-shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriptive Location SE-1 The east side of East Ave. from 480 feet south of Catalpa St. to 182 feet north of Catalpa St. The north and south side of Catalpa St. from East Ave. to Brownstone PI. The west side of Brownstone Pl. from Catalpa St. to 150 feet south of Catalpa St. Not including the frontage parkway at 6649 East Ave.. Ground Cover area: 10,355 square feet Turf area: 6,258 square feet Hardscape area: 4,050 square feet SE-2 The south side of Fisher Dr. from 361 feet east of East Ave. to 210 feet east of Starstone PI. Ground Cover area: 9,366 square feet Hardscape area: 4,074 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P415 SE-3 The south side of Fisher Dr. from 860 feet west of Mulberry St. to Mulberry St. Ground Cover area: 3,676 square feet Hardscape area: 6,910 square feet Total Ground Cover: 23,397 square feet Total Turf: 6,258 square feet Total Hardscape: 15,034 square feet Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. With a Majority Protest for the Proposition 218 Ballot Initiative in September 2010 the city stopped maintaining the north side of Fisher Avenue and reduced the service level to a B. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9T/STOZ JeaA le3sH P416 L eSuoweDnJ otpue 4o Alit—g '0N Puls!Q aoueualuTLAI adempuei ciK c' D h Z ->' W r W a U J a3 a.' u� w O ZO W Q Q (n C W gW O 2 O Y 0 O iw O cL S tY E. 0 7_, 2 IT 0 ® I 1 0 I a z h e CO X94 O Z \ w V `Ii N o y ca. Q.." Al as w a 0 Q) Q) — z lbw o co : >ft. n • 4 ro Q. RI • 1 co Ci o N O 0 N p F t 111n s s !eo[se `F£S8: $1' Y i 's>a i I�111St13 $t �5 _a �gS�h • Ii; ! :IIjIflflutfi P417 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2015/16 Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries $ 3,840.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 1,740.00 Subtotal Personnel $ 5,580.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $ 2,600.00 Emergency Equipment & Vehicle Rental 0.00 Contract Services 12,050.00 Tree Maintenance 4,300.00 Utilities Water Utilities 9,870.00 Electric Utilities 1,370.00 Assessment Administration 1,050.00 General Overhead 6,170.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $ 37,410.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Proiects $ 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $ 0.00 Total District.Expenditure Budget $ 42,990.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 32,740.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 670.00 Total Estimated Revenues $ 33,410.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 9,200.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 42,610.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 32,746.51 Total District EBU Count 216.22 Actual Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 151.45 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 151.45 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1989/90, when the District was formed, and subsequent District annexations. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P418 Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2015 Reserve Fund Balance $ 58,803.00 Use of Operating Reserve Fund — Fiscal Year 2015/16 (9,200.00) Operating Reserve Contribution — Fiscal Year 2015/16 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2016 Reserve Fund Balance $ 49,603.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities - Water This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities - Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P419 General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P420 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D. all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. • Landscape Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P421 In this Assessment District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the Caryn Planned Community and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the Caryn Planned Community. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the Caryn Planned Community which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the Caryn Planned Community and proximate to the improvements and within the Assessment District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries . of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit Landscape Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P422 derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use}, and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land- use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit _ Non-Residential 2.00 Acre or portion thereof Church 1.00 Acre or portion thereof The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated " rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code) Assessment Rate Rate per EBU Units/Acres EBUs per EBU Single Family Residential $151.45 $151.45 188.00 188.00 Non-Residential $151.45 $151.45 13.61 27.22 Church $151.45 $151.45 1.00 1.00 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P423 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9T/STOZ.ieaj Ie3s!u P424 ST e8uoweDnj oypueb Jo OD—8 ON 13Ia1s!Q apueualu!ew adeDspuei CO a V 4 Q to w 5 I,. c 0 _. a) 1.1.. C.) , 1 Ay lulaya r I ap o 0 .�, t o C13 i i v- ��_� i Ad epueM113 Q my epueAw13 ! Ri I O 1 I, i ClIg !9 halo Aea r ny J91'5814008 ! J i I AV Jalsayaob r" ny ua)l!II!W r._.._.._----° i ny ua),lll!W I 0 1 I I 1 Ay uaneH ! , i I IAy uaneH ! h i toe esowJaH I 1 1 .ny esowJaH I i` i Ay Plegl1.131tf I 4 Ay Pleq!ya�t/ Ay uewllaH 1 I� ny uewllaH I /00#.5..... I (O i ny pJenau!n iS ueyawea i ! r----1 .,,r c72 fl.. giiiilli! L J m t cu 75 Q !Iii!IPiiti ft! 0 as _ co illitatif, a 0.541:1 ^ 1101111 Will! Ili P425 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2015/16 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable (County Use Code) per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $151.45 188.00 188.00 $28,472.60 Non-Residential $151.45 13.61 27.22 4,122.46 Church $151.45 1.00 1.00 151.45 TOTALS 202.61 216.22 $32,746.51 *"Actual Assessment Rate per EBU" is the same as "Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate Per EBU". A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2015/16 Fiscal Year. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P426 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2015/2016 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (Lower Etiwanda) P427 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 9 (LOWER ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tern William Alexander, Council Member Lynne B. Kennedy, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology Dean Rodia, Parks & Landscape Superintendent Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P428 TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Letter 1 Introduction 3 Reason for Assessment Process for Annual Assessment Plans and Specifications 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District Description of Improvements and Services Map of Improvements Estimate of Costs 9 District Budget Definitions of Budget Items Method of Assessment 12 General General Benefit Special Benefit Method of Assessment Spread Assessment Diagram 16 Assessment Roll 18 Assessment Roll Annexations P429 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 15, 2015, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga, under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 15-119, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (Lower Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2015/16 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. . SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2015/16 Total Estimated Assessment $ 171,960.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 27.090.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 199,050.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 393,480.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 592,530.00 Total District EBU Count 2,149.56 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 80.00 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $ 542.15 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9—City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P430 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirely of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefitted Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Annual Engineer's Report, Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. g:OFESsia,-,NREW 063672, Mar- A. S -uer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 9—City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P431 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a Landscape Maintenance District No. 9—City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P432 written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, o opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold a community meeting with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If the is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9—City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P433 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area known as Lower Etiwanda, which is south of Victoria Street, north of Foothill Boulevard, generally east of Etiwanda Avenue and the 1-15 Freeway and west of East Avenue. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements maintained by the District include the paseos, community trails, trees, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the District. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble-shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Garcia Park (formerly known as South Etiwanda Park). Site# Descriptive Location 9-1 The west side of East Ave. from 380 feet north of Chateau to 290 feet south of Chateau. Ground Cover area: 7,244 square feet Hardscape area: 7,525 square feet 9-2 The west side of East Ave. from 339 feet north of Brookfield to 157 north of Brookfield. Brookfield from East Ave. to Oak Crest. The east side of Oak Crest to 137 feet north of Brookfield. Ground Cover area: 2,390 square feet Hardscape area: 6,874 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 9—City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P434 9-3 The west side of East Ave. from 790 feet north of Highfield to 256 feet south of Highfield. Ground Cover area: 8,769 square feet • Hardscape area: 10,669 square feet 9-4 The west side of East Ave. From 295 feet north of Via Veneto To Via Veneto. The north side of Via Veneto From East Ave to Dolcetto. The east side of Dolcetto from Via Veneto to Miller Ave. The south side of Miller Ave from 372 feet west of Dolcetto to 240 feet east of Dolcetto. The west side of Dolcetto from Miller to Garcia. The north side of Garcia from Dolcetto to Etiwanda Ave. Ground Cover area: 48,612 square feet Hardscape area: 28,746 square feet 9-5 The north side of Miller from 429 feet west of Dolcetto to 1029 feet west of Dolcetto. Ground Cover area: 6,519 square feet Hardscape area: 3,325 square feet 9-6 The north side of Miller from 254 feet east of Dolcetto to 167 feet west of Dolcetto. Ground Cover area: 4,089 square feet Hardscape area: 2,854 square feet 9-8 The south side of Baseline from Etiwanda Ave. to Shelby. The Baseline median form Etiwanda to 473 feet east of Shelby. Ground Cover area: 16,395 square feet Hardscape area: 14,558 square feet 9-9 The north side of Candlewood St. from Exbury St. to Etiwanda Ave. Ground Cover area: 3,362 square feet Hardscape area: 786 square feet 9-10 The north side of Baseline form 522 feet east of Forester to 180 feet west of Frester. The Baseline median form 503 feet east of Forester to 200 feet west of Forester. Ground Cover area: 16,930 square feet Hardscape area: 13,600 square feet 9-11 The north side of Mueller Ct. from 40 feet past the east end of Mueller Ct. to 20 feet east of Dicarlo Pl. Ground Cover area: 9,420 square feet Hardscape area: 742 square feet 9-12 The north and south sides of Highland Ave. from 217 feet west of Norcia Dr. to 210 feet east of Dicarlo Pl. Ground Cover area: 12,471 square feet Hardscape area: 14,445 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 9—City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P435 9-13 The south side of Carnesi Dr. from Etiwanda Ave. to 395 feet east of Murietta Ct. Ground Cover area: 8,919 square feet Hardscape area: 6,203 square feet 9-14 The west side of East Ave. from 665 feet north of Miller to Miller. The north side of Miller from East Ave. to 667 feet west of East Ave. Ground Cover area: 9,150 square feet Hardscape area: 16,226 square feet 9-15 The north side of Base Line Road from Shelby Place to 343 feet east of Shelby Place. Ground Cover area: 3,480 square feet Hardscape area: 4,638 square feet 9-16 The east side of Dolcetto PI. from Garcia Dr. to Via Veneto Dr. The south side of Via Veneto Dr. from Dolcetto Pl. to East Av. The west side of East Av. from Via Veneto Dr. to 276 feet south of Via Veneto Drive. Ground Cover area: 16,310 square feet Hardscape area: 13,411 square feet FH-17 The Foothill Blvd. median from Etiwanda Ave. to Cornwell Ave. Ground Cover area: 8,275 square feet Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9—City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P436 Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 N • • J Improvement Ma • RAr.clro f'(;1'(:AMON(: —,— A T J ' I 1 210 FIN RAMP r1r210'ONRP F +rte . I ,10iFW f HIGHLAND AV HIGHLANDAV , '19-11 CID J 1 III.wJ - •9-12 J - Ci ..== . _II ,� - ��==111111 111111 I Mg , ��r� I�/i��i�i�� ` � A .� ' 111 ����■1�'■�O _ 11111 a�iiii;1g0 H viii. % 111 14 . r --—� m . ` I� �� era �� ■���u� I aT Y,� UfIHl��I s1 I. U :C I I, - LL �������� III I f f,I(BUZ �''ii+lrie niu`s�♦. ,4nil r yeas 1M .' •a•1 ilwl au„'� rralf•q.+,a 11/,' #. 1111►�t+• 1111111 , n- HI nnuusl 1 14 i1tiH��.�� ,t III Ili"111 w m IIUn Is - pipil tines j �1�11iU1':Na���ll�/+�dnllln!1t =� 111 1 es-- _ c+','�/ 11______ I_ '',„ '111111W4„1"11• �Jr ' '-,---ERG ulu m, �. 11iumirom" 1111111 t t� IMP" III , in v., /11 ' 11= "��luII:r tell IL li • •• 711••.. r 14-s* \I�• _ ?_'11 Imo.--- _ - 111111111 - fIIfll qt( ---- ' r � 11 iii. ■■■. –m/l11111111 9-2 uallun�� -}3 HIM I / ! /1/11111/ • u■*,..- .1'_.; 9-1 . aoi A......4 mutt . �. 2�11M(Li Os ' 1 1 nantlli �: 15 we C\111111 I - Iq11 t . IILF-. T_. 9-10• Ii 1 or BASE LINE Wilts / 1\l — Iq 9a i Q •1 r ¢ ♦s o: I omol 2 l it Ina �' Q 1 TA g;;;,..` 6 111 1111' ¢ I III a� w � , .Os f 111 . II( , 1� O ���CCC���CCC������{ O LL711U11 :: �'; Z WATER METER El nit: . -, 7T1D� 93 0 • n r r , lG`_l !i IRRIGATION PUMP M cm na.ui� a_ iIiIkI J! I s� r h1111iu n J-L _ u� an:" 11111 1111M111111; PE TRAIL CHURCH ST :, fY I I; 7111 a 11M11 111 7 ' o IT �} ,u � � \`5 i IRRIGATION LINE 1 . I tall. 'e g.6 MILLERAV94V PARKS --- r�.: 8_17 A 9-14 • �h�`� V MI LMD 9 .1w1014111 . g�o9-160 MAJOR STREET , �$J1 FREEWAY —@-- b GARCIA PARK PARCELS VICTORIA GARDENS --L— hO FOOTHILL BL Tnelm,geographic Information Cu<atbbya data he City nmo ga . FH17� •w pres•nted.,pubic resource of general information. ir's ---, s.gCityofRonoho Con or gua.ee to theoo no mph. nly.iepies enlafon o i guai antte es to the oonh,L sea ence.im uray romp leteness or tmeliness A any � - „i,1Ldr11.1L Information provked to YOU Mrein.The isersMuld not rely –IIIIIIP.) FH-17 IN LMD 9,BUT won the Information for any reason and directed to O 11 111 y MAINTAINED BY MARIPOSA The Cl dof R Rancho Cucamonga and without nlM herein peas City gas ons mid warrMOW Ynfadon ���5 �' but ntneanytoe n reph.warioror,o mecnante ally anp. ♦ but not n,Neto,Me mpllee rrr,rC, of mantar ro.,and *Mess la a p•diou/u purpose.The Ciy A Rancho Cucamonga shat nether aooepl nor assume any 4hity,reg•idass o11ha causation for(f)any en ors.omissions or ioaca,ucles In iany lamination provided andfo,(10 any action or...orlon unrag doe to any pas ons rslai ca upon the Information raUCN herein Landscape Maintenance District No. 9—City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P437 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2015/16 Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries $ 159,600.00 Part-time Salaries 11,200.00 Fringe Benefits 76,440.00 Subtotal Personnel $ 247,240.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $ 23,600.00 O & M/Computer Equipment 0.00 Cellular Technology 1,370.00 Emergency Equipment & Vehicle Rental 1,200.00 Contract Services 134,770.00 Tree Maintenance 29,070.00 Utilities Water Utilities 66,460.00 Electric Utilities 9,170.00 Assessment Administration 9,100.00 General Overhead 35.410.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $ 310,150.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Outlay— Equipment $ 0.00 Capital Proiects $ 40.000.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $ 40,000.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $ 597,390.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 171,960.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 27,090.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 199,050.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 393,480.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 592,530.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 171,964.80 Total District EBU Count 2,149.56 Actual Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 80.00 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 542.15 • Landscape Maintenance District No. 9—City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P438 Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory'and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2015 Reserve Fund Balance $ 2,033,422.00 Use of Operating Reserve Fund — Fiscal Year 2015/16 (398,340.00) Operating Reserve Contribution — Fiscal Year 2015/16 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2016 Reserve Fund Balance $ 1,639,942.00 The City has reserve funds that are more than sufficient to cover an estimated six months' worth of maintenance and servicing costs for the District. When there are excess funds in the District's reserve account, the excess can be used to lower the annual levy to property owners within the District. The City will continue to annually review the estimated costs and expenses for the District as well as reserve fund levels, in order to determine if future levies can be reduced as well. Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits .available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9—City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P439 Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities - Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Utilities - Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Proiects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9—City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P440 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D. all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. • General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9—City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P441 In this Assessment District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the District and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the District. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the District which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the Caryn Planned Community and proximate to the improvements and within the Assessment District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9—City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P442 To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use}, and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land- use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Cod e) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit Multi-Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit Non-Residential Improved 2.00 Acre Vacant Property 0.25 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table reflects both the maximum allowable assessment and the actual assessment rates for each year since the formation of the district and the proposed assessment rate for fiscal year 2015/16 for the District: Fiscal Year Maximum Assessment per EBU Actual Assessment per EBU 2000/01 $375.91 $375.91 2001/02 388.02 375.91 2002/03 398.81 375.91 2003/04 414.44 375.91 2004/05 421.71 375.91 2005/06 438.67 375.91 2006/07 459.15 375.91 2007/08 476.76 387.94 2008/09 492.41 387.94 2009/10 492.41 387.94 2010/11 501.55 387.94 2011/12 516.58 187.00 2012/13 527.03 187.00 2013/14 539.38 80.00 2015/16 542.15 80.00 Landscape Maintenance District No. 9-City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P443 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Cost of Living Inflator Each fiscal year beginning with Fiscal Year 2002/2003, the amount of the assessment for the District has increased each year, based upon the Consumer Price Index ("CPI"), All Urban Consumers, for the Los Angeles-Anaheim-San Bernardino Area, as determined by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, or its successor. The Engineer shall compute the percentage difference between the CPI for March of each year and the CPI for the previous March, and shall then adjust the existing assessment by an amount not to exceed such • percentage for the following fiscal year. Should the Bureau of Labor Statistics revise such index or discontinue the preparation of such index, the Engineer shall use the revised index or a comparable system as approved by the City Council for determining fluctuations in the cost of living. If for any reason the percentage change is negative the maximum allowable assessment would not be decreased by reason of such negative percentage change and would remain at the amount as computed on the previous fiscal year regardless of any CPI adjustment. The annual assessment cannot exceed the actual costs to operate the District in any given year. If operating costs are such that the maximum assessment amount is not needed, the City would levy only what is needed for that year. The Fiscal Year 2015/16 actual assessment rate is reduced from the prior year due to the City having reserve funds that are more than sufficient to cover an estimated six months' worth of maintenance and servicing costs for the District. When there are excess funds in the District's reserve account, the excess can be used to lower the annual levy to property owners within the District. The City will continue to annually review the estimated costs and expenses for the District as well as reserve fund levels, in order to determine if future levies can be reduced as well. There will be no Cost of Living rate increase for Fiscal Year 2015/16. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9—City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P444 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9—City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9Z/SZOZ aeaA leJs!J P445 LL e&uoweDnJ oypuej Jo hip—6 ON TD!.ns!G aaueualu!ew adeJspuel Ch a) a) V � � 'i N J L o D CI o t\ ny#Weg3 g) c�1 x �Z` j �1'I% _l `IW I i/ N = CD El 53 I7 tQ i �° a le i 0 1• i ny epuer ij — j nto epuenn!13 CO I j 1 I I is alaaio AeQ J ny Jajsayooe{ �!Ay Jaisayooa Ay ua)$!II!W r•—.._.._.._•_•• j ny ua)l!II!W I if I i I I 1 ny uaneH i i i Into uaneH I H I ny esoutioH j i Inv esowiaH I 1 ,1 AV Pleq!yoly 1 `1 j ny Pleq!yoiy e it j ny uewllaH j -nto uewllaH co I . v I i 1 ny P enau!A is ue!laweo • I i; i VII f 1 i F�e_fYf 3,1'ti L-..1.._.._ ��._...._..N ny anoJ0 ally. it¢ �8 5 J L 2 00 �'{a ���e^gZ :..._.�_...�..�.. O Q c;11.12 e Z $ p gF x c m LL { • U) 3 s k'i •)c� _ il^ Irk r - f 4 4�, 1, ;Ea a• e��;;;J ii11a$ ai g . � • "iY 4l�• ��p ltFsgff at P446 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2015/16 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Actual Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Actual (County Use Code) Per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $80.00 1056.00 1056.00 $84,480.00 Multi-Family Residential 80.00 1,057.00 1,057.00 84,560.00 Non-Residential Improved 80.00 18.28 36.56 2,924.80 Vacant Property 80.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTALS 2,131.28 2,149.56 $171,964.80 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following Annexation is effective for the 2015/16 Fiscal Year. APN Annexation Project Total Total Property Type Date Name Units/Acres EBUS 0227-121-33 08/20/14 TR 16578 6.00 6.00 Single Family & 37 Residential • Landscape Maintenance District No. 9—City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P447 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2015/2016 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 (Rancho Etiwanda) P448 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10 (RANCHO ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tern William Alexander, Council Member Lynne B. Kennedy, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology Dean Rodia, Parks & Landscape Superintendent Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P449 TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Letter 1 Introduction 3 Reason for Assessment Process for Annual Assessment Plans and Specifications 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District Description of Improvements and Services Map of Improvements Estimate of Costs 9 District Budget Definitions of Budget Items Method of Assessment 12 General General Benefit Special Benefit Method of Assessment Spread Assessment Diagram 16 Assessment Roll 18 Assessment Roll Annexations P450 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 15, 2015, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga, under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 15-119, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 (Rancho Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2015/16 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2015/16 Total Estimated Assessment $ 559,400.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 8.120.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 567,520.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 12,390.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 579,910.00 Total District EBU Count 786.00 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 711.71 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $ 834.27 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10—City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P451 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirely of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefitted Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Annual Engineer's Report, Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. S/pyq 01,OFES `0RE4,6, `F\ W No.0053672 E .6;90• d L 7 * ; 4 �q cNn.. !� ; ��/� CALIFQ: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 10—City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P452 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a Landscape Maintenance District No. 10—City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P453 written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, o opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold a community meeting with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If the is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10—City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P454 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area known as Rancho Etiwanda, which lies north of Highway 210, east of Day Creek Channel, and west of Hanley Avenue. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements maintained by the District include the paseos, community trails, trees, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout Rancho Etiwanda. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble-shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Day Creek Park. Site# Descriptive Location 10-1 The west side of Day Creek from 790 feet north of Richfield to Wilson. The north side of Wilson from Day Creek to 227 feet west of Day Creek. This site overlaps 10-2. Ground Cover area: 16,941 square feet Hardscape area: 3,589 square feet 10-2 The north and south side of Wilson from 497 feet west of Alvarado to Day Creek. The south side of Wilson from Day Creek to Bluegrass. The Wilson median from Day Creek to Bluegrass. Ground Cover area: 47,275 square feet Hardscape area: 6,444 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 10—City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P455 10-3 The west side of Day Creek from Wilson to 144 feet south of Clydesdale. The Day Creek median from Wislon to Banyan. Ground Cover area: 32,619 square feet Hardscape area: 10,983 square feet 10-4 The east side of Day Creek from 648 feet south of Keenland to Wilson. Ground Cover area: 15,952 square feet Hardscape area: 4,365 square feet 10-5 The west side of Bluegrass from Wilson to 705 feet south of Challendon. Ground Cover area: 26,882 square feet Hardscape area: 12,220 square feet 10-6 The south side of Banyan from Rochester to Day Creek. The north side of Banyan from 427 feet west of Rocking Horse to Rocking Horse. The west side of Day Creek from Banyan to Vintage. The north side of Vintage from Day Creek to Paseo ending 153 feet west of Sand Hill. Ground Cover area: 44,000 square feet Hardscape area: 16,197 square feet 10-7 The north side of Vintage from 180 feet east of Taylor Canon Place to Day Creek. The east side of Day Creek from Vintage to Banyan. The south side of Banyan from Day Creek to Bluegrass. Ground Cover area: 22,164 square feet Hardscape area: 11,724 square feet 10-8 The landscape against the south side facing wall north of the 210 freeway from the top of the slope on the east side of Day Creek to 300 feet eastward. The Day Creek median from the 210 freeway to Vintage. The east side of Day Creek from Caltrans ROW to Vintage. The south side of Vintage from Day Creek to 180 feet east of Taylor Canyon. Ground Cover area: 16,841 square feet Hardscape area: 7,025 square feet 10-9 The north side of Coyote from Brookstone Place to Day Creek. The east side of Day Creek from Coyote to 358 feet north of Coyote. The west side of Day Creek from 118 feet north of Coyote to 380 feet north of Coyote. Ground Cover area: 9,403 square feet Hardscape area: 6,052 square feet *This site previously had 8,488 square feet of ground cover and 5,752 of Hardscape prior to the addition of the area on the west side of Day Creek. 10-10 The north side of Wilson from 395 feet east of Day Creek to Day Creek. The east side of Day Creek from Wilson to Blackstone. The south side of Blackstone from Day Creek to Stoneview. The north side of Blackstone from Day Creek to 165 feet west of Stoneview. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10—City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P456 Ground Cover area: 26,304 square feet Hardscape area: 19,117 square feet 10-11 The west side of Day Creek from 340 feet north of Banyan to Banyan. The north side of Banyan from Day Creek to Rocking Horse. Ground Cover area: 20,378 square feet Hardscape area: 11,212 square feet 10-12 The paseo on the east side of Stoneview Rd. across from Duncaster PI. Ground Cover area: 3,326 square feet Hardscape area: 2,374 square feet 10-13 The west side of Day Creek Blvd. from 340 feet south of Vintage Dr. to 915 feet south of Vintage. Ground Cover area: 27,416 square feet Hardscape area: 16,167 square feet 10-14 The south side of Vintage from Saddle Tree Dr. to Day Creek. The west side of Day Creek from Vintage to 325 feet south of Vintage. Ground Cover area: 7,777 square feet Hardscape area: 16,167 square feet *This sites irrigation pump and valves are powered from site 10-13 Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10—City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2015/16 j� .. I r457 a Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 f Improvement Map C**. _± CRAVC110 `' - it . N ; /10•• r saw -ob/• b-t-C ,--.- , „„r„,,-,,, ./ t=nl®111110 _ ' A \ /it, 1iV ,... _...... .i , . .1._ 0 . . ,(W-1. _:,K.,.. _ -� _ �� • ; i�� - OP . /10-9 Se' ''.,— All . e ii 11 jr- --- ' I iE MN : 44,as �� ��u V 0.. - -- 40 - NI _ , A, 11 Ni'7.46' 4 ,,e, ...___ �(t .111/' 7.,,iii."4, - ,kP - ----._..__..__.....` ♦ 10-2 WILSON AV 10-3. 11 10.1 FU I- 1-1 F- L t-----. 0 T 1oa � 10 '----- .:::- 1 --qT hi.A. 1 pi [-a i ID ito ii I 11::;.1{ li -:- -\",. .. \-7 41' 1N Snaps,data and geographic nftrmaton("Information') ;M 1 1 I '_. � � I - -- IT II-.1TI ILT I available by and through M•CrgaRanctw Cucamonga , .I-- -� })_ �.l Ili m P D W makes rain`rmra}bn = 1 I.`_I"-- I l.. .. I -L-71-- /J/I ruled as a public resource of - / ��• s �j 111 The C' of Cuoamon p 111 1 �.� I ' ' 'warranty.r.pm•nL•on or guar.•••as o the student. I('I'I�. r I if . 1 sequence,..racy completeness or timeliness a any I�11, I`� —----� Information provided to you nerrn.Tn•user should nob." I � r" )�` upon the Informacn for any reason and t directed to J r��._�_)__�_�� I independently d Al lnb males presented herein pen yrvdY any r npr in.cMaRarrcho cusamong.expire.",andwbout lmdrrot ., - .I.....7 — /--� declaims any and Al representations and warfare..,nobdbg, _ �` but not kneed to.tn..npli•dwananti..01 merchantability and W-1,1,[111 w /C'7 J fitness for•W.A.purpose The Cep of Rancho Cucamonga w ■■■ r— shat n•b.,accept nor anon*any Ia *y.r•gart.,otthe -- ■ -1 causation for 0)any*non.omits ions or naoouraas n ■■L any nleemtion vended an Nor(i0 any action or inaction rnp due to my person.;Nance upon the edormabon 10.11: — syllabi herein 0 Ll— ,a-7 ;ri .. 0 WATER METER 1111 L -- 111111 • -. ■■■1111 n1 I ---;1 If IRRIGATION PUMP `-- .--- � I- PE TRAIL , 10-8 n I- I I. inn S`;�� f MIMI• IRRIGATION LINE �1 \ 1 �5 —, 10-13 PARKS �' 111111/11 11".,, .1, Lit I NM LMD 10 BOUNDARY �'1 / 10 1". 7 3 ----- '- ' MAJOR STREET +z otARp !I- I 1�I7T 17 T• 1210•FW` • FREEWAY I2n0aOF.RP, I2100NRP PARCELS HIGHLAND AV r1-i 4. j L i.,l;. _1_, i 1 .I,i y l l ti ti'y j Li i 1.I.Iii,d_,-i IA E Landscape Maintenance District No. 10—City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P458 • ESTIMATE OF COSTS • The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget • Estimated 2015/16 Budget Personnel Services Regular Salaries $ 130,200.00 Overtime Salaries 1,050.00 • Part-time Salaries 31,110.00 Fringe Benefits 65.880.00 Subtotal Personnel $ 228,240.00 Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance $ 14,500.00 Operations and Maintenance/Facilities 4,000.00 O & M/Computer Equipment 0.00 Cellular Technology 0.00 Emergency Equipment& Vehicle Rental 0.00 Emergency Operations and Maintenance 500.00 Contract Services 102,600.00 Contract Services/Facilities 2,000.00 Tree Maintenance 10,000.00 Utilities Water Utilities 140,350.00 Electric Utilities 23,100.00 Assessment Administration 4,260.00 General Overhead 52.640.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $ 353,950.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Outlay— Equipment $ 0.00 Capital Projects $ 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $ 0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $ 582,190.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 559,400.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 8.120.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 567,520.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 12,390.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 579,910.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 559,404.06 Total District EBU Count 786.00 Actual Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 711.71 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 834.27 Landscape Maintenance District No. 10—City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P459 Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2015 Reserve Fund Balance $ 843,801.00 Use of Operating Reserve Fund — Fiscal Year 2015/16 (14,670.00) Operating Reserve Contribution — Fiscal Year 2015/16 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2016 Reserve Fund Balance $ 831,411.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the District. Utilities - Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping within the District. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10—City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P46O Utilities - Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10—City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P461 • METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D. all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement' (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10—City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P462 In this Assessment District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the District and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the District. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the District which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the District and proximate to the improvements and within the Assessment District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit - The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10—City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P463 To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use}, and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land- use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units IProperty Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Dwelling Unit The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following summarizes the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Property Type Assessment Rate Actual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code) per EBU Rate per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Single Family Residential $834.27 $711.71 786.00 786.00 The following table reflects both the maximum allowable assessment and the actual assessment rates for each year since the formation of the district and the proposed assessment rate for fiscal year 2015/16 for the District: Landscape Maintenance District No. 10—City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P464 Fiscal Year Maximum Assessment per EBU Actual Assessment per EBU 2001/02 $597.09 $597.09 2002/03 613.69 597.09 2003/04 637.75 597.09 2004/05 648.93 597.09 2005/06 675.03 597.09_ 2006/07 706.54 597.09 2007/08 733.65 616.20 2008/09 757.73 616.20 2009/10 757.73 616.20 2010/11 771.79 616.20 2011/12 794.92 616.20 2012/13 811.01 616.20 2013/14 821.46 616.20 2014/15 830.00 647.01 2015/16 834.27 711.71 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Cost of Livinq Inflator Each fiscal year beginning with Fiscal Year 2002/2003, the amount of the assessment for the District has increased each year, based upon the Consumer Price Index ("CPI"), All Urban Consumers, for the Los Angeles-Anaheim-San Bernardino Area, as determined by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, or its successor. The Engineer shall compute the percentage difference between the CPI for March of each year and the CPI for the previous March, and shall then adjust the existing assessment by an amount not to exceed such percentage for the following fiscal year. Should the Bureau of Labor Statistics revise such index or discontinue the preparation of such index, the Engineer shall use the revised index or a comparable system as approved by the City Council for determining fluctuations in the cost of living. If for any reason the percentage change is negative the maximum allowable assessment would not be decreased by reason of such negative percentage change and would remain at the amount as computed on the previous fiscal year regardless of any CPI adjustment. The annual assessment cannot exceed the actual costs to operate the District in any given year. If operating costs are such that the maximum assessment amount is not needed, the City would levy only what is needed for that year. The actual assessment rate for Fiscal Year 2015/16 will increase from $647.01 to $711.71 per single-family residence, a rate increase of 10% as compared to Fiscal Year 2014/15. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10-City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P465 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10—City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9T/STOZ JeaA IeDs!i P466 LT e2uoLu Dn3 o puej jo Al!O–OT 'oN 1J!Jisia auueualu!ew adeDspuel 0 a�i w V r L. E 0 Mr J ❑ ti C U CG 0 { �� Ay AJJa43 C) c. i -o J %.r o iiii�� N ce i 0 o= a m I v a>j @ o_ al) m 2 0 C a • CO : i Ay iSe3 6 i Z L I ` L..y epuenA!l3 I —I Ay epueM!13 1 ..._(1) .�.._. i ,, j = AV Jaisayaoa ! _ 113 i Ay 101904308 .., � ..� ! i 1 Ay ual!II!W r—.._"_.._._.: I ny ual!II!W I 1 i I 1 I Ay uaneH I.i 1 Ay uaneH I i AV esowJaH i Ay esowJa- Ay Pleq!4ai`d 1 I Ay Pleq!4oJy : I Ay uewllaH J .-AV uewllai 1 1 t i Ay i Co'Aau!n is ue!IeuJe3 i r.._.._ �..._ �ti _.� c . i Ay 8AOJ a i n i l 6 I 11 1_1 �s l° ill!D.1 1 1 ...." Ci J !tii !iItI ioz cc c co a Zfil is- c 03 lillligill: i b. 1;7 fillaif�iiir z 1 = P467 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2015/16 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2015/16 actual assessment for the District: Actual Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Actual (County Use Code) Per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $711.71 786.00 786.00 $559,404.06 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2015/16 Fiscal Year. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10—City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P468 Ai es STAFF REPORT Stitt* ADNIINISTRATIVE SERVICES GROUP 147 RANCHO Date: August 5, 2015 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services/ By: Chris Bopko, Management Analyst Ill Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL THE RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT, APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT, AND ORDER THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016. NO INCREASE IN THE ASSESSMENT RATE IS BEING PROPOSED OR PERMITTED. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council approve the Resolution confirming the Diagram and Assessment, approve the Annual Engineer's Report, and order the levy and collection of the annual assessments within the Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85. There is no increase to the current rate in this district permitted or proposed for Fiscal Year 2015/2016. The Engineer's Report is on file in the City Clerk's Office. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Each year, per the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City is required to hold a public hearing to receive public comment on the levy and collection of assessments within Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85. This requirement must be accomplished before the City can submit the annual assessments for placement on the County Tax Roll. PD 85 was originally created to provide funds to finance the cost of construction, maintenance, operation and debt payment of Heritage Community Park and Red Hill Community Park. Heritage Community Park is a 40-acre facility located on the southwest corner of Hillside Road and Beryl Street. Red Hill Community Park is 42 acres and is located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Vineyard Avenue. The District's boundary includes all of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the general exception of land east of the Deer Creek Channel and the Victoria, Caryn and Terra Vista Planned Communities. The final debt service payment on the bonds that were sold to finance the construction of Red Hill and Heritage Community Parks was paid on September 1, 2005. With the debt repaid, in 2006 the annual assessments were decreased from $52 per year per single-family residence to $31 per year. The annual assessments levied and collected are dedicated to the ongoing maintenance and operation and periodic capital improvement expenditures for the parks. For several years, PD 85 had been running at a deficit as expenses for utilities and maintenance of expenses have increased. However, rates for this district cannot be increased without an election process to give the property owners the opportunity to express their support for, or in opposition to, an increase in such assessment. A proposed new West-Side Parks and Street Lighting District would replace the existing Park District PD-85, Landscape Maintenance Districts 1, 3A, 3B, and 5, and Street Lighting Districts 2 and 6. These districts would be completely dissolved and their P469 CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL THE RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT,APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT,AND ORDER THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016. NO INCREASE IN THE ASSESSMENT RATE IS BEING PROPOSED OR PERMI I I ED. AUGUST 5,2015 PAGE 2 assessments eliminated upon the formation of the proposed district and approval of the levy of special taxes within such district by the qualified electors of such district. At the City Council meeting of July 1, 2015, the City Council unanimously voted to move the replacement district for consideration by the voters on the November 2015 ballot. In the meantime, a set of budget-balancing measures has been implemented that is adequate in the near term to bring revenues and expenditures into alignment. The measures include staff reductions, expanding the use of contract mowing services, reducing the maintenance of site amenities (lights, playgrounds, sand, etc.) to the most basic levels, naturalizing additional turf areas at Red Hill and Heritage Parks, and providing less direct support to sports groups using sports fields. Pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, each year the City Council must adopt resolutions initiating proceedings to levy the assessments, approve the Annual Engineer's Report and declare its intention to levy and collect assessments for the upcoming fiscal year. Assessments for PD-85 will be levied according to the following schedule: Definition Assessment per Parcel Single Family Residential $31.00 Multi-Family Residential $31.00 Less than 1.50 acres $15.50 1.51 acres to 3.50 acres $46.50 3.51 acres to 7.00 acres $108.50 7.01 acres to 14.00 acres $217.00 14.01 acres to 25.00 acres $434.00 25.01 acres and larger $775.00 Attachments Resolutions P470 RESOLUTION NO. 15-157 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT, APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT AND PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 15th day of July, 2015, adopt its Resolution of Intention No.15-124 pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, as amended (the "1972 Act"), declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments within Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 for Fiscal Year 2015/2016 and giving notice of the time and place for a public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessments within the Districts; and WHEREAS, the City Council previously received and preliminarily approved a report of the Assessment Engineer as required by the 1972 Act; and WHEREAS, notice of such public hearing was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the Office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom, and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby finds and determines that notice of the public hearing has been given and the proceedings for the consideration of the levy of the annual assessments within each District have been undertaken in accordance with the 1972 Act. SECTION 2: The final assessments and diagram for the proceedings, as contained in the final Engineer's Report for the District, are hereby approved and confirmed. The assessments for the District contained in the Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2015/2016 are hereby confirmed and levied upon the respective lots or parcels in the District in the amounts as set forth in applicable Engineer's Report. SECTION 3: This City Council finds and determines that the public interest and convenience requires the levy and collection of assessments within the District for the Fiscal Year 2015/2016, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 15-124, be done and made. P471 SECTION 4: The above-referenced diagram and assessment shall be filed in the Office of the City Clerk. Said diagram and assessment, and the certified copy thereof, shall be open for public inspection. SECTION 5: The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to immediately file a certified copy of the diagram and assessment with the County Auditor. Said filing is to be made no later than the 3rd Monday in August, 2015. SECTION 6: After the filing of the diagram and assessment, the County Auditor shall enter on the County assessment roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount assessed thereupon, as shown in the assessment. SECTION 7: The assessments shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as County taxes are collected, and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of County taxes shall apply to the collection and enforcement of the assessments. SECTION 8: The assessments as above confirmed and levied for these proceedings will provide revenue and relate to the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2015 and ending June 30, 2016. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of August, 2015. L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on , 2015. Executed this , at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P472 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2015/2016 City of Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 oossiO,ygk , 441-Q�o �ONEWszt,e No.0053672 s .640.4 , Sa 4.1" OFCA i Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer P473 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT NO. PD-85 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tern William Alexander, Council Member Lynne B. Kennedy, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P474 TABLE OF CONTENTS Authority for Report 1 Findings 1 District Analysis 2 Estimate of Work 3 Method of Spread 6 Annexations 7 Boundary Map 7 P475 AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report for the 2015/2016 fiscal year is prepared pursuant to the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15, Section 22500 of the Streets and Highways code. Provisions for this annual assessment are included in Chapter 3 of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The purpose of this report is to set forth findings and the assessment analysis for the annual levy of assessments for the Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 thereafter referred to as "the District". This District, using direct benefit assessments, was originally created to provide funds to finance the cost of construction, maintenance, operation and debt payment of Heritage Community Park and Red Hill Community Park in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Subsequently the debt has been repaid with only the ongoing maintenance and operation with periodic capital improvement expenditures of the parks remaining. FINDINGS Section 22573, Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, requires assessments to be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. The section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The means of determining whether or not a parcel will benefit from the improvements is contained in the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7, commencing with Section 5000 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California). The 1972 Act also provides for the classification of various areas within an assessment district into benefit areas where, by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive differing degrees of all territory receiving substantially the same degree of benefit from the improvements and may consist of contiguous or noncontiguous areas. As the assessments are levied on the bases of benefit, they are considered a user's fee, not a tax; and, therefore, are not governed by Article XIIIA. Properties owned by public agencies, such as a city, county, state, or the federal governments is not assessable without the approval of the particular agency and, normally, are not assessed. Certain other parcels used for railroad mainline right-of-way, public utility transmission right-of-way, and common areas are also exempt from assessment. The assessment for mobile home parks will be based upon underlying lot acreage. Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85—City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P476 DISTRICT ANALYSIS A. District Boundary The district includes all of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the general exception of land east of Deer Creek Channel and the Victoria, Caryn & Terra Vista Planned Communities. All parcels of real property affected are more particularly described in maps prepared in accordance with Section 327 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, which are on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor in the Hall of Records, 172 West Third Street, San Bernardino, California and which are hereby made a part hereof by reference. B. District Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD — 85. C. Facilities The existing works within the District boundary are generally described as follows: 1. The maintenance and operation of Heritage Community Park including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, restrooms, equestrian facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, athletic facilities, and walking, jogging and equestrian trails and sanitary sewer connections. 2. The maintenance and operation of Red Hill Community Park including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, waterscape, restrooms, senior citizens facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, major lighted athletic facilities, jogging trail, sanitary sewer connections and onsite drainage inlets. Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85—City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P477 ESTIMATE OF WORK The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 permits carrying forward surpluses or recovering deficits in subsequent fiscal years. Costs for the district will be reviewed annually. Any surplus credited against assessment or any deficits shall be included in the assessment for the following fiscal year. Proposed Maintenance Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries $326,720.00 Overtime Salaries 3,680.00 Part Time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 153,270.00 Subtotal $483,670.00 Operations & Maintenance Operations & Maintenance $74,310.00 Operations & Maintenance — Facilities 2,500.00 Vehicle Operations & Maintenance 0.00 Emergency Equipment &Veh. Rntl 0.00 Equip Operations & Maint. 8,000.00 Contract Services 84,590.00 Contract Services/Facilities 0.00 Tree Maintenance 18,200.00 Telephone Utilities 8,450.00 Water Utilities 215,590.00 Electric Utilities 103,910.00 Assessment Administration 153,430.00 Admin./General Overhead 115.780.00 Subtotal $784,760.00 Capital Outlay Capital Outlay — Improv. Other than Bldg 0.00 Subtotal 0.00 Total PD-85 Expenditure Budget $1,268,430.00 • Projected Revenue (includes projected $1,256,470.00 delinquencies and interest& penalties) Operating Reserve Contribution 11,960.00 Total PD 85 Revenue Budget $1268,430.00 Total District Assessment $1,156.920.00 Total District Parcel Count 27,569 Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85—City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P478 The actual assessment will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Opening Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2015 Reserve Fund $832,788.00 Use of Operating Reserve — Fiscal Year 2015/16 11,960.00 Operating Reserve Contribution — Fiscal Year 2015/16 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2016 Reserve Fund $820,828.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Overtime Salaries: This item includes costs attributed to work performed by full-time employees over and above their normal scheduled hours. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the parks improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the parks improvements. Tree Maintenance: This item includes the contract costs attributed to maintaining the street trees and other trees throughout the parks. Utilities—Water: This item includes the costs to furnish water for the landscaping and parks. Utilities — Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the parks lighting, sprinklers and irrigation controllers. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of • Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85—City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P479 District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County Tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85—City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P480 METHOD OF SPREAD The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 indicates that assessments may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes costs among all lots or parcels within the District in proportion to the estimated benefit received. A. Definitions The District is divided into three categories for the purpose of determining the assessments as follows: CATEGORY A — includes parcels based on the number of existing residential units within certain ranges of parcel size. CATEGORY B— includes all parcels not defined in Category A or Category C CATEGORY C — includes exempt parcels. Exempt parcels are those parcels listed by the County Assessor's as exempt and/or which have an assessed value of less than $500. B. Formula The assessment formula is based on actual land use information contained in the current San Bernardino Assessor's computer files and Assessor's parcel maps. Category A: All parcels containing existing residential dwelling units and meeting the following conditions. Parcel Size/Range Dwelling Units/Parcel Less than 1.5 Acres and 1 or more dwelling units 1.51 to 3.5 Acres and 2 or more dwelling units 3.51 to 7.0 Acres and 4 or more dwelling units 7.01 to 14.0 Acres and 8 or more dwelling units 14.01 to 25 Acres and 15 or more dwelling units 25.01 Acres and larger 26 or more dwelling units Category A is based on the number of existing residential units. Category B: All parcels not defined in Category A or Category C. Category C: All exempt parcels as defined below: 1. All properties currently tax exempt; 2. All public ownership; Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85—City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P481 3. Railroad mainline rights-of-way; 4. Major utility transmission rights-of-way; 5. Mineral rights; 6. Parcels so small they currently cannot be built upon; 7. All normally assessable parcels within an assessed valuation of less than $500 and 1.5 acres or less; and, C. Summary of Preliminary Assessment Amounts Category A: The preliminary estimated assessment rate, which will be levied during fiscal year 2015/2016, is $31.00 per residential dwelling unit for those parcels in Category A. Category A parcels containing more than one residential dwelling unit will be assessed for an amount equal to $31.00 times the number of residential dwelling units. Category B: The assessment, which may be levied for parcels within Category B during fiscal year 2015/2016, shall be according to the following schedule: Definition Assessment Per Parcels Single Family Residential $31.00 Multi-Family Residential $31.00 Less than 1.5 Acres $15.50 1.51 Acres to 3.50 Acres $46.50 3.51 Acres to 7.0 Acres $108.50 _ 7.01 Acres to 14.0 Acres $217.00 14.01 Acres to 25.0 Acres $434.00 25.01 Acres and larger $775.00 Category C: The assessment shall be $0.00 for Category C parcels. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2015/16 Fiscal Year. Boundary Map An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85—City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9i/SIOZ Jean leas!j P482 g eOuoweunj oyuueg jo Alij—Sg-ad •oN poulsia luawanojdwl uo!4eaaaab pue sued O N m a^^ 2 11.0 co .N Q w '. J a CO v Q w CO ••••• 0 kik c 0 Q in 0 ▪U) 111 ai ---1 ny Gaya rt.?. _ ' 0 j , w o `�� c m E 1 _ 1 UU) 0 O Milli AV lSe3 (n i Q Inv epuennq ny epuenn!13 i 1 CCC►IW �la 19 aiO ea 1 i '� ny Jalsayaoi ° J1" ny Ja)sayDo�{ ny ua�lyl!yN ny ual!II!W ny uaneH ny uaneH ny esow.1aH ny esotwaH AV Pleq!yaJy ny P!eq!yaly ny uewllaH ny uewllaH s v co AV pJeAauin lS ue!lauwe3 C Ilii1 `4 q a s{C4 00 I n 4 ;q cc _ ny ammo tcllC'sgc U) c m E 6 ,Ibb aF i;r J = ? -C #141i:!:0/1 cn ct c m o_ lE0,p.h`.� RD 11111r"� . 0 ell _ f is P P483 STAFF REPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES GROUP 1-1 1-41 CUCAMONGA Date: August 5, 2015 UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager �/ From: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services V/ By: Chris Bopko, Management Analyst III Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL THE RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND ASSESSMENTS, APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND ORDER THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO'S. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016. NO INCREASE IN ASSESSMENT RATES IS PROPOSED OR PERMITTED. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the Resolution confirming the Diagrams and Assessments approve the Annual Engineer's Reports and order the levy and collection of the annual assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. There are no increases in these districts proposed or permitted for Fiscal Year 2015/2016. The Annual Engineer's Reports are on file in the City Clerk's Office. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Each year, per the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City is required to hold a public hearing to receive public comment on the levy and collection of assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance District No's. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 (each a "District" and collectively the "Districts"). This requirement must be accomplished before the City can submit the annual assessments for placement on the County Tax Roll. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has eight (8) Street Lighting Maintenance Districts that provide street light coverage throughout the general city and planned communities. Each year the assessments received are earmarked for the maintenance and operation of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities. This maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of street lighting maintenance, including repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subject area in connection with these Districts. The City utilizes prior year carryovers along with current year assessment revenues, supplemented with Gas Tax revenues in some cases, to meet the districts' annual expenses. When the SLDs were established, they were in conjunction with the new development coming into the City, and were intentionally designed to ensure that each district bore the costs of the maintenance of the infrastructure that provides special benefit to the property owners. It has been over 20 years since there was an assessment increase in the SLDs, and certain districts will soon P484 CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL THE RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND ASSESSMENTS, APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT'S AND ORDER THE T.FVY AND COIT..F_C1ION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO'S. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 AND 8,INCLUSIVE,FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016. NO INCREASE IN ASSESSMENT RATES IS PROPOSED OR PERMITTED. AUGUST 5,2015 PAGE2 require an assessment increase in order to remain financially self-sustaining while continuing to provide a high level of maintenance. However, no rate increase can occur unless the City conducts an election process to give the property owners the opportunity to express their support for, or in opposition to, an increase in such assessment. Over the last two years, City staff has engaged the community with a public outreach program and phone surveys to inform property owners about the status of their West-Side parks, landscaping and street lighting districts and to determine their willingness to approve redistricting with new rate structures to meet the fiscal challenges of the districts. This proposed district would replace the existing PD 85, LMD's 1, 3A, 3B, and 5, and SLD's 2 and 6. These districts would be completely dissolved and their assessments eliminated upon the formation of the proposed district and approval of the levy of special taxes within such district by the qualified electors of such district. At the City Council meeting of July 1, 2015, the City Council unanimously voted to move the replacement district for consideration by the voters on the November 2015 ballot. As stated in the Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Fiscal Year 2015/2016 Engineer's Reports, the assessment rates shall remain unchanged from the previous FY 2014/2015 rates. The assessment rate and district description for each Street Lighting Maintenance District is as follows: Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights on arterial streets. The current assessment rate is $17.77 per single-family residence. The commercial rate is $35.54 per acre. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights on residential streets. The current assessment rate is $39.97 per single-family residence. The commercial rate is $79.94 per acre. This district is operating at a 50% budget deficit and is currently being backfilled with Gas Tax funds to sustain services. SLD 2 is one of the districts proposed to be dissolved and replaced by the new West-side District. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights within the Victoria Planned Community. The current assessment rate is $47.15 per single-family residence. The commercial rate is $94.30 per acre. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights within the Terra Vista Planned Community. The current assessment rate is $28.96 per single-family residence, the multi-family rate is $14.48 per dwelling unit and the commercial rate is $57.92 per acre. This district will require a rate increase in future years to maintain service levels. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights within the Caryn Planned Community. The current assessment rate is $34.60 per single-family residence. It is noted that reserves for SLD 5 are completely depleted; this district is now operating with a significant deficit, and is being backfilled with Gas Tax revenues to sustain services. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights within the commercial and industrial area of the City. The current assessment rate is P485 CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL THE RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND ASSESSMENTS, APPROVE THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND ORDER THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN 5TRF.F"1'LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO'S. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 AND 8,INCLUSIVE,FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016. NO INCREASE IN ASSESSMENT RATES IS PROPOSED OR PERMITTED. Aucusr 5,2015 PAGE 3 $51.40 per acre for commercial property. SLD 6 is one of the West-Side districts proposed for restructuring to meet the fiscal challenges of the street light districts. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights within the Etiwanda Highlands Community. The current assessment rate is $33.32 per single-family residence. This district is operating at a significant deficit and is being backfilled with Gas Tax funds to provide services. This district will require a rate increase in future years to maintain service levels. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 assessments pay for energy and maintenance for streetlights in South Etiwanda. The current assessment rate is $30.60 per single-family residence. Attachments Resolutions P486 RESOLUTION NO. 15-158 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAMS AND THE ASSESSMENTS, APPROVING THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND ORDERING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NO'S. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, INCLUSIVE, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2015/2016 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 15th day of July, 2015, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 15-118 (the "Resolution of Intention") pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, as amended (the "1972 Act"), declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance Districts No's. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. (each a "District" and collectively the "Districts") for Fiscal Year 2015/2016 and giving notice of the time and place for a public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessments within the Districts; and WHEREAS, the City Council previously received and preliminarily approved a report of the Assessment Engineer (each an "Annual Engineer's Report" and collectively the "Annual Engineer's Reports") for each District as required pursuant to Article 4 of Chapter 1 of the 1972 Act, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"); and WHEREAS, subsequent to the preliminary approval of the Annual Engineer's Reports, the Assessment Engineer revised each of the Annual Engineer's Reports (each a "Revised Annual Engineer's Report" and collectively the "Revised Annual Engineer's Reports") to add to such reports information regarding the annexations, if any, to each applicable District during Fiscal Year 2015/2016 and to make certain other insubstantial formatting revisions to the summary of assessments and the District budgets that did not result in an increase of the expenditure budget for the Districts, or any one of them, or the aggregate assessments or any individual assessment proposed to be levied within the Districts, or any one, of them; and WHEREAS, notice of such public hearing was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by the Assessment Law, shown by the affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the Office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received and considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: P487 • SECTION 1. This City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. Notice of the public hearing has been given and the proceedings for the consideration of the levy of the annual assessments within each District have been undertaken in accordance with the 1972 Act; and b. The annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2015/2016 proposed to be levied within each District as set forth in the applicable Revised Annual Engineer's Report do not exceed the annual assessments as previously authorized to be levied within such District and, therefore, the proposed levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2015/2016 within such District are not deemed to be "increased" over the maximum authorized annual assessments. SECTION 2. The final assessments and diagrams for the proceedings, as contained in the Revised Annual Engineer's Report for each of the Districts, are hereby approved and confirmed. The assessments for the Districts contained in the Revised Annual Engineer's Reports for Fiscal Year 2015/2016 are hereby levied upon the respective lots or parcels in the Districts in the amounts as set forth in applicable Revised Annual Engineer's Report. SECTION 3. This City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in the Resolution of Intention, be done and made. SECTION 4. The above-referenced diagram and assessment shall be filed in the Office of the City Clerk. Said diagram and assessment, and the certified copy thereof, shall be open for public inspection. SECTION 5. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to immediately file a certified copy of the diagram and assessment with the County Auditor. Such filing shall be made no later than the 3rd Monday in August 2015. SECTION 6. After the filing of the diagram and assessment, the County Auditor shall enter on the County assessment roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount assessed thereupon, as shown in the assessment. SECTION 7. The assessments shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as County taxes are collected, and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of County taxes shall apply to the collection and enforcement of the assessments. SECTION 8. The assessments as above confirmed and levied for these proceedings will provide revenue and relate to the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2015 and ending June 30, 2015. • P488 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of August, 2015. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby .certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on , 2015. Executed this , at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P489 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2015/2016 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterials) P490 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIALS) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tern William Alexander, Council Member Lynne B. Kennedy, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P491 TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Letter 1 Introduction 3 Reason for Assessment Process for Annual Assessment Plans and Specifications 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District Description of Improvements and Services Map of Improvements Estimate of Costs 7 District Budget Definitions of Budget Items Method of Assessment 10 General General Benefit Special Benefit Method of Assessment Spread Assessment Diagram 13 Assessment Roll 15 Assessment Roll Annexations P492 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 15, 2015 the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 15-116, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2015/16 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2015/16 Total Estimated Assessment $ 806,440.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies _ 30,230.00) Total Estimated Revenue $ 836,670.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund _ 119.320.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 955,990.00 Total District EBU Count 45,382.66 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 17.77 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $ 17.77 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P493 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirely of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefitted Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Annual Engineer's Report, Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. QQCFESS/O,y� o lIm '¢ No.0055672, 1 �•� 1'? 4 \* CMt. ' - ��� ii'OFCAUF�Q� Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P494 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P495 written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold a community meeting with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If the is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P496 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as the entire City of Rancho Cucamonga. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9Z/SIOZ aea,, lepsH P497 9 eSuoweJnJ ogJuea Jo Al1J—I ON Puls!Q apueualuiew Bu!ILISF1 laaalS Z-"QiC N a- 4 s ea �, cm Q 'V C n3—S`> - lx a : a) o c I ''�^- m 7 Q V/ m c=> w 0 o mto U7 U \\` nvxaaHO a I a a d • 1 z J O LL u) c7 ■ N '� L y tiik CC' IS a al L n •Allili91111 III V itti z � ' yepuem�3�/lbyO_ N r AVVOMdMlt3 1 yepuem!�„ct iiit•N ..... 0 �L .. L �. 1 . ...it" _ 18)i33ZiO AVO CI 0 im1O �PU __L ..� ` 5N ,a) c _ ny la/sayo. 0 9VI V == IL TAiHPIII::::0�� 'nV miw L J� i m RS' J J a y uaneH CIO z O E . j In fny uaneH o m" 1111 .c‘ ifin. ky esouaH rlp 5 AV VSO N H y esowiaH 111 1111111111111 61 _j VPIec = O bPleQ!WM TMwM OH O MVW��3H �Io nyuew6aH OM 4 1S 1138 Ir i • ! F v Pie,Cawn is uegaweo �N 0 . . ° Li1 .pip 4 a�, i 6e.,Be ci5 J _LS3NIHdd'dS �. m sig$1b3'3p86ei�e3#a� S j m . -y ano,9 . 9 3, 9 S a 8 . gl = a 9 sign"Atroec°88 = 116;INA WV-4'U Ido 3=a LL ZS;si]ei pw as 4;10": j. ")81 a"Aap2e1eAa Y$= ePH9A @ea 611$ DZB lIS 'I lii o@e�a@��9n_Aei#I i • P498 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2015/16 Budget Personnel Services Regular Payroll $ 13,490.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 6.340.00 Subtotal Personnel $ 19,830.00 Operations and Maintenance Training $ 180.00 Membership Dues 50.00 Operations and Maintenance 7,990.00 Cellular Technology 1,000.00 Equip Operations & Maintenance 500.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 1,500.00 Electric Utilities 728,560.00 Assessment Administration 160,940.00 General Overhead 37,090.00 Interfund Allocation 0.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $ 937,810.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Proiects $ 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $ 0.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 957,640.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 806,440.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 30.230.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 836,670.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 119,320.00 Net Revenues/Expenditures $ 955,990.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 806,449.86 Total District EBU Count 45,382.66 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 17.77 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 17.77 *Includes rounding as each parcel's annual assessment must be rounded down to the nearest even cent for County tax roll purposes. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1-City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P499 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2015 Reserve Fund Balance $ 855,158.00 Use of Operating Reserve Fund — Fiscal Year 2015/16 (120,970.00) Operating Reserve Contribution — Fiscal Year 2015/16 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2016 Reserve Fund Balance $ 735,838.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Training: International Municipal Signal Association (ISMA) Certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light Maintenance Districts. Membership Dues: ISMA dues. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light and Maintenance Districts. Utilities - Telephones: This item includes the costs for master controllers for dial-in data lines for uploading, downloading and observing system operations for traffic signals. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P5OO Utilities - Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the street lights and traffic signals. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P501 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount•to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P502 • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit • In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1984, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 19.96/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P503 development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land- use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Benefit Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi-Family Residential 1.00 Unit Non Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for'the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code) Assessment Rate Rate per EBU Units/Acres EBUs per EBU Single Family Residential $17.77 $17.77 29,060.00 29,060.00 Multi-Family Residential 17.77 17.77 9,943.00 9,943.00 Non Residential 17.77 17.77 3,189.83 6,379.66 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P504 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9I/SZOZ JeeA le3s!J P505 VI eSuoweanj oipuelj jo Al!J—I '0N 13!J1s!d aJueualu!ew Su!11-10!1 laaJlS !. a '~ N p N l c 0 fn [Z, t()O V I ny AJJay3 curt• t C_ J In Ei '* _ O •/ N CO o O .� u Q Ay lse3 in I j, L IC ny epuemgg rm II ft. J w a) a Ike ny JaIsayooa n Ja sa oo y i 4 a nv ual!IIIW ny ua)l!II!W ny uaneH ny uaneH ny esoWJaH ny esouJJaH ny pleq!UoJy Ay pleq!4oiy ny uewlle- 65 AV ueu IeH (/) L L ,r p co, ny au!A is ue!lauJe3 c a'cfDifilk:i _ _ n anoJ , sigh;= r(/J c a) m cA y Ibfia"-{g U' -a- 00 by{a 91 t e: fA o Dr rid pci . �i C m U. < s� t $ t ca II a) C �CeyC+}YE6 0 co 2 m `t�' a D r f 1., ;I..; 0• a.b RI 4...k:4 i=s' 11.1.t11 all: P506 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2015/16 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable (County Use Code) per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $17.77 29,060.00 29,060.00 $516,396.20 Multi-Family Residential 17.77 9,943.00 9,943.00 176,687.11 Non Residential 17.77 3,189.83 6,379.66 113,366.95 TOTALS 42,192.83 45,382.66 $806,449.86 *"Actual Assessment Rate per EBU" is the same as "Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate Per EBU". A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following Annexations are effective for the 2015/16 Fiscal Year. Annexation Total Total Parcel Number Date Project Units/Acres EBUs Property Type Single Family 0227-012-24 1/16/2013 TR18826 8.00 8.00 Residential DRC2011- 0229-192-09 & 18 2/6/2013 00255 1.81 3.62 Commercial/Industrial Single Family 1100-131-01 6/5/2013 TR18466 43.00 43.00 Residential 0225-161-19, 32- Single Family 34 6/19/2013 TR18744 30.00 30.00 Residential DRC2012- 0207-222-05 7/3/2013 00932 0.95 1.90 Commercial/Industrial 0209-151-27, 37 & 7/17/2013 PM18794 20.24 40.48 Commercial/Industrial 0209-161-24 0209-411-33 7/17/2013 PM19397 20.60 41.20 Commercial/Industrial DRC2012- 0209-032-40 7/17/2013 00790 3.17 6.34 Commercial/Industrial DRC2013- 0209-021-05 9/4/2013 00053 9.25 18.50 Commercial/Industrial DRC2013- Single Family 1062-211-06 11/6/2013 00427 1.00 1.00 Residential DRC2012- 0229-181-03 & 11 11/6/2013 01065 4.77 9.54 Commercial/Industrial Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P507 1089-081-16, 17, Single Family 20 &21 11/6/2013 TR18819 17.00 17.00 Residential Single Family 0225-161-13 11/6/2013 TR18709 12.00 12.00 Residential • Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1—City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P508 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2015/2016 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) P509 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (LOCAL STREETS) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tern William Alexander, Council Member Lynne B. Kennedy, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst Ill P510 TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Letter 1 Introduction 3 Reason for Assessment Process for Annual Assessment Plans and Specifications 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District Description of Improvements and Services Map of Improvements Estimate of Costs 7 District Budget Definitions of Budget Items Method of Assessment 10 General General Benefit Special Benefit Method of Assessment Spread Assessment Diagram 13 Assessment Roll 15 Assessment Roll Annexations P511 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 15, 2015, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 15-116, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2015/16 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2015/16 Total Estimated Assessment $ 363,810.00 Plus Gas Tax Contribution 350,170.00 Plus Interest Earned 1,820.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 715,800.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 2,580.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 718,380.00 Total District EBU Count 9,102.32 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 39.97 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $ 39.97 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2—City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P512 parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirely of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefitted Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Annual Engineer's Report, Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Q%OfESSp N °I\ No.(b59i37y FPI 4.640:1 4( CML CAUIF00��F ralir Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2—City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P513 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2—City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P514 written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold a community meeting with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If the is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2—City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P515 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as the entire City west of Haven Avenue. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2—City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9T/STOZ.IeaA leosid P516 9 e2UOW 3n)otpueu Jo Ain— Z 'oN ipPisia aDueua4uIeW 2uiIyOi1 TaaJTS Z -`1‹ cn d rn Z • o a) ci C 9 7 \ (n N m O Q w x U � Y w CD Cn 1 m AV lZRl3 H� •• i 1 . .2 x-04,0.11 ...i.01. , . -- 44 - -ill . 8 m ' 0 W X111 ii 3 o s I 11111211"$121 MIME y Z v eP H 0�1 rarsA( AV VO NVMIl3 P ny epuern93 N �, I/VkQNvMu � J.� '` El:.WV:,• M= x oa, 111O�Q1pr l9. 33aa;�VO • I�AN ' co �.. P .» :...v �. X15 �, _ R nyia}sayoo. IIt O al] 7�1� ��, sN 0 c 11{��!M��`/ •�g� 'AV el 31 S3H002l II 111 107111 111"1 (In r �' ® �1_JI■ memo m8 L am......my�a,. >- 0�'fAV.N3N111IW �/,J 1.. Olin _ ^���!nlw o:_,,_:„„..., . . ., i.t C/ 2 ,._. 2 it Li,,f' ... 1 CO MI c c , iir a . •` ' M+ Ai •_ kit w 1.1`AV N3AVH~ - ` �� , vuaneH 1 ,_ I, -c - hAit-_.i.,`611;'. 1 : :-...-,1c--i.lg it IlliffrAIL in-��. 1....7 i jr. AViisoiN 3H ~:. O .r a`1 F..m B.! �- n esouua mJ J c { o _ _. _1. L ♦+ _III s u/� ' [1 r ,1 r W ire. 01-412:.1�"t Y t _ 111 '..a QA AV PIA'.' ' "in k•...T,:j,l'I'-R'- zmat [ -.. 0 um! AVO1V9IH3IV� moo nvple4!4oI N CO+ (PAWL SRH13wV FF!i��=(rr( Co — t- ∎ .1." i.'f In~ ,:i . v `. uew�aH 1j� r�+,. .a �`• v i,l m in r•,,...3m6..:I.. ,_,_ x. ! r�� ny ue wllaH A Ayr-_ _..i AV N</W�13H k rip--- 1letl39a 11P(}J �.... tr �r . it If _ _.� V Pie CauN 47 1 z� , i uepaweo o � > I �i.Iniu: s 7 a 'S cc w R>�' " _ j Mnif' o�' W 1 2 EEO ':W Litt. 11" tip. J ��. :7 i'i08'f c8 �0 B _-'/M IS V ` tI _-1 Ilig w-<iirl'AA!I _1 @ �i -. N vana'J sgvi��belKe ;jpA.' � � m •a agave8uauatverine ." I i 1! "=e,.a �•. " ?z-;ag egpaa3 Va ed ..g— ' k 8eB9 des°a eeeg�Ae m a'A 9;e4,iSg @e3""°c3o . . 54 = 2aalaes`eol ,MAI ZEoei 7 I'� a� iii•A °it Ci+ih'i s4 ea3e.aitl% P517 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget • Estimated . 2015/16 Budget Personnel Services Regular Payroll $ 0.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 0.00 Subtotal Personnel $ 0.00 Operations and Maintenance Training $ 0.00 Membership Dues 0.00 Operations and Maintenance 0.00 Equip Operations & Maintenance 0.00 Contract Services 0.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 678,480.00 Assessment Administration 37,400.00 General Overhead 5,080.00 Interfund Allocation 0.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $ 720,960.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects $ 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $ 0.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 720,960.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 363,810.00 Plus Gas Tax Contribution 350,170.00 Plus Interest Earned 1,820.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 715,800.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 2.580.00 Net Revenues/Expenditures $ 718,380.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 363,819.73 Total District EBU Count 9,102.32 Actual Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 39.97 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 39.97 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2—City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P518 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain The improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual • assessment per EBU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2015 Reserve Fund Balance $ 208,392.00 Use of Operating Reserve Fund — Fiscal Year 2015/16 (2,580.00) Operating Reserve Contribution — Fiscal Year 2015/16 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2016 Reserve Fund Balance $ 205,812.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, .vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Training: International Municipal Signal Association (ISMA) Certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light Maintenance Districts. Membership Dues: ISMA dues. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light and Maintenance Districts. Utilities - Telephones: This item includes the costs for master controllers for dial-in data lines for uploading, downloading and observing system operations for traffic signals. Utilities - Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the street lights and traffic signals. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2—City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P519 Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. • Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2—City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2015/16 • P520 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public pathways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2—City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P521 • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1983, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. • A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2—City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P522 development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land- use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi-Family Residential 1.00 Unit Non Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code) Assessment Rate Rate per EBU Units/Acres EBUs per EBU Single Family Residential $39.97 $39.97 7,033.00 7,033.00 Multi-Family Residential 39.97 _ 39.97 1,989.00 1,989.00 Non Residential 39.97 39.97 40.16 80.32 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2—City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P523 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. • Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2—City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9T/STOZ aea,k leps!j P524 VI e2uowepn3 oyaueb Jo Al!o—Z oN puTs!a aaueualu!ejN Su!Ng!i ;aaaTs N u) V •Ii N ww C.) › i , 4 J ny tiJa4a r.t.111 RI i Nit ce C j )t 1/4, c 13) 1 J o *us 1 0 s ▪CC i Z I \rx ny jSe3 i c +C i Ay epuemil9 ny epuenn!i3 .c, 1 J i w i l9 Naaia Sea fiD itft AV Ja;sayooa ! AV y Ja;sa o0 y b ny uaml!UV r------------ ny ua)llll!W Ay uaneH Ay uaneH Ay esowJaH ny esowieH AV PIe1!tPJ`d AV Pleq!yoiy Ay uewllaH - ny uewllaH L L v (0 Ay pieAeu!n Is ue!lawea y . v i AV OAOJO a s i l�1 N a�c m— cn i 6s i t� t — O L L CO r- 1- ,_ sf I 1. ]t- z m Q / F =1,1£14 co i j jy Its 4 N W L7lF,C ..f. CO D ilifallitlii 1. t. 9 l !ilsit! a P525 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2015/16 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable (County Use Code) per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $39.97 7,033.00 7,033.00 $281,109.01 Multi-Family Residential 39.97 1,989.00 1,989.00 79,500.33 Non Residential 39.97 40.16 80.32 3,210.39 TOTALS 9,062.16 9,102.32 $363,819.73 'Actual Assessment Rate per EBU" is the same as "Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate Per EBU". A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following Annexations are effective for the 2015/16 Fiscal Year. APN Annexation Project Total Total Property Type Date Name Units/Acres EBUS 0207-201- 03/19/14 TR18817 94.00 94.00 Single Family 01, 21 & 44 Residential 0229-041- 05/21/14 TR 18870-1 166.00 166.00 Single Family 09 Residential 0209-122- 08/06/14 PM 19505 2.00 2.00 Single Family 01 Residential 0229-041- 09/17/14 TR 18870 125.00 125.00 Single Family 12 Residential 1074-281- 10/01/14 DRC2013- 1.00 1.00 Single Family 09 01001 Residential Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2—City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P526 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2015/2016 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) P527 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tern William Alexander, Council Member Lynne B. Kennedy, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P528 TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Letter 1 Introduction 3 Reason for Assessment Process for Annual Assessment Plans and Specifications 6 Description of the Boundaries of the District Description of Improvements and Services Map of Improvements Estimate of Costs 8 District Budget Definitions of Budget Items Method of Assessment 11 General General Benefit Special Benefit Method of Assessment Spread Assessment Diagram 14 Assessment Roll 16 Assessment Roll Annexations P529 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 15, 2015, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 15-116, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2015/16 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2015/16 Total Estimated Assessment $ 352,370.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies _ 14,680.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 367,050.00 Less Operation Reserve Fund Contribution (38,510.00) Total Expenditure Budget • $ 328,540.00 Total District EBU Count 7,473.42 Actual Assessment per EBU • $ 47.15 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $ 47.15 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3—City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P530 • 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirely of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been, imposed on any Specially Benefitted Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Annual Engineer's Report, Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. QPOFESS/py �Q`,PNDREWglFl�yy s No.0653672 Ia AL •6-301; Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3—City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P531 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of.the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3—City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P532 If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold a community meeting with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3—City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P533 If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If the is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3—City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P534 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area located south of the 1-210 Freeway, west of Etiwanda Avenue, southwest of the 1-15 Freeway and east of Haven Avenue, also known as the Victoria Planned Community, and are more particularly in the diagram of the District included herein. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3—City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9I/SZOZ.1 eaA ieasid P535 L eSuoweanJ oyauea Jo Alp-E •oN TDIJTSIQ aaueuaauiew Suii11 !l laaa1s .Y f Q 44 h'-J a /1V 1SV3 0. 1 .•�1�.•∎•/�••�•o•�••�" ZO C to 2 F- _i/lll, � � _ w 1iNni -�,.j CO L N IU,- S _t/� :,. J `iu,..a. `�f4gnry +, '� f0 r _ �Iia i` l� n II Illso ,o• fir•.•„ - p_r m C p --"� . i , • • i" •t.- L • •,• AVVGNVlWl3 L. U cn 11 . • •tip•.•. ••y• :•. :••• .•b i •• -. .: •• L._ •.t•• •'ti.. • ::•Z4 • •• Mai 4 b • 1 a TN- oboe .44.••••• . I._ . . ..•__ ,tr •t •,•� 1 •• i t: •1t • a .• S..% .....•»K• 1� . �•,•1•, •. . +� J —— 'N 11,••••••••••••• ••.•••.•-••••••�•.• •• •• •• ••S ... J ti�M - fsL� 19>132i3.1V.0 •• •• • ..•.... �,,. ' ••• _ _r•u. 0 _o, _C • • • • • •.•.+~ i m• .nIt"- f•ti® c ••`- - ..�I1I1 1 11111 c ;SS • •, t••••... L-,- . CFgq,�,±A� , 1., I..-.• III. Ili o ••• ••:• •••a41••• w•,•r••• /�V2i31S M U T mr i O 0. —g •• -.•••• to:4%.... Z a) ' ') j ..,1_ 1.11 in ill , 1 , _.. az :r.......47 vie r. *Is%a.4;4 toot - '....2.14azifc, ./ .--r-. • ••• ••• 1 . \•;• .,":\------t- - IPIi. I i 1 • • •• •a •.• ••• .•• ...i , _ 1 ,S ,,;..'' •Ilf:..±.-:.f.t.no,..:'' 0 c 4.,▪ •• "V.•%• •••••0 a*. Na. :?.:.-47.•.%,r `''' 05 ___----- 7 -. • -:•• •••„, ....., :N •j• ,•,�.gUY} • ,.S.S r••j_. +�•.It.. r-�.. iic�L.`i� 4 -��I� - rec CD d ,••�ti••.,ii/1e�V,N3>Il�ll� ••�•. T /L.�a� _' yy�{ ". CO 7.-. _N •••,:: : : •'••• ••� 3/ •�. Z ' . ✓ Gf. A, "+ - ^-1-O inglill •��• 11)L.JJ n 11 `. a ▪ • • • �iI• alit'." �- C C w .. _ ^_._ :__ / � ;..1 y I;3 =BD 1ee'&p :; 1411u. . aY /r� r r , vim.°ya le A8 e�1 �8s SSS��, �i.ulll- g,':. r •MC;,h. 4 +J _ 9 i g 9 9 p 9 a a y -e 9 =r .uu Ir,; .,,, rfpii A� • q.2.846.11,2;B 9augeF B�B Nart:': �` �� I,jt „ � ,yi W f"` 4�.11a 8,,, el' A•rp , b a q•8„" ._ ..a{ ar-..Nn- ,I {_ a }1 _ V.,3•111 y 1 1 1 g 9 e i g,a nnuuura i1\mt,0 I,uwnu_ " U f -9 g°�,p i 9 @ e;'1°0 6 CZ .vuNl.. n.q.nn." '�`' Cl)VJ Fd� 9yyH°,cam=��°ppi gi 01 L r.. 1:./-`i ii:: -nmu: 'I�r.1.4.42!� � �1 I,/�y�, A '� Z t 1 ABD qo.a << I �ia�►".iii. :'. �•. „m,..!.... .... /A �-�V,�C ...t∎e e l i t.o•B 2'a g �sr .•.i.J:;�i :.l:: e.. . ..inHMN vJ }�`• �'ot�I��Jlte-�g°e!�a J • i '�ta\�1g1i1■ tisi I 1""+ . u u•g B_i 5• P536 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2015/16 Budget Personnel Services Regular Payroll $ 13,490.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 6.340.00 Subtotal Personnel $ 19,830.00 Operations and Maintenance Training $ 180.00 Membership Dues 30.00 Operations and Maintenance 9,940.00 Equip Operations & Maintenance 0.00 Contract Services 0.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 258,000.00 Assessment Administration 35,640.00 General Overhead 4,920.00 Interfund Allocation 0.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $ 308,710.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Proiects $ 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $ 0.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 328,540.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 352,370.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 14,680.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 367,050.00 Less Operating Reserve Fund Contribution (38,510.00) Net Revenues/Expenditures $ 328,540.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 352,371.75 Total District EBU Count 7,473.42 Actual Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 47.15 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 47.15 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3—City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P537 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2015 Reserve Fund Balance $ 1,221,467.00 Use of Operating Reserve Fund — Fiscal Year 2015/16 (0.00) Operating Reserve Contribution — Fiscal Year 2015/16 38,510.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2016 Reserve Fund Balance $ 1,259,977.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Training: International Municipal Signal Association (ISMA) Certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light Maintenance Districts. Membership Dues: ISMA Certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light and Maintenance Districts. Utilities - Telephones: This item includes the costs for master controllers for dial-in data lines for uploading, downloading and observing system operations for traffic signals. Utilities - Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the street lights and traffic signals. • Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3—City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P538 Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Proiects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the,fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3—City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P539 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3—City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P540 • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1982, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3—City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P541 development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land- use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier • Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi-Family Residential 1.00 Unit Non Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code) Assessment Rate Rate per EBU Units/Acres EBUs per EBU Single Family Residential $47.15 $47.15 6,397.00 6,397.00 Multi-Family Residential 47.15 47.15 589.00 589.00 Non Residential 47.15 47.15 243.71 487.42 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3—City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P542 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3—City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2015/16 1 9T/STOZ aeaA leosH P543 ST eSuoweanj otpueb Jo Ai!O–E 'ON ppls!a aaueualu!elN Su!;y2!1 Taails M al vas V to •„,„„,, N to E CI Q j ! U ui 0 c o . Ay Anaya r:, ._.._.. J 1.. 0 re c •1` J m it o Ver I s 3 as .� 1 m ° a i ---:.._.a.._.._._�ny lse3 in 3 �.+ I I L .= i Ay epuemu —i ny epuenn!13 j I 19 laaia lea _._..__.._.._.._.1 j wny Jaisayooe i. 1 I AV Jalsayoob 1 3 my uamI!W r--------------: I ny uaVII!W j ' j j 1 j i 1 Ay uaneH I jAvueieI-1 I �I j 7 1 AV esowJaH AV PIe4!yaly I ti e ! o� �AV Pl 9y y �r ny uewllaH 1 0 ny uewllaH 1 r 1 I 6 Inv pJeAau!n is ue!lawea i j j ¢ b. i # Ellin Ia6! y y1! E r.._.._ 1—'Y.._.—_.._.._i Ay 3AOJ0 :11111111i6 L� L J m tj6o=a 3 f t O CO i'�et-i-tf F Y[e ' jj;iii co { � ' i ' p 99 [[[ gyp' :�vj : C P���. X, 1a.3ij iii c a P544 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2015/16 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable (County Use Code) per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $47.15 6,397.00 6,397.00 $301,618.55 Multi-Family Residential 47.15 589.00 589.00 27,771.35 Non Residential 47.15 243.71 487.42 22,981.85 TOTALS 7,229.71 7,473.42 $352,371.75 *Actual Assessment Rate per EBU" is the same as "Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate Per EBU". A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following Annexations are effective for the 2015/16 Fiscal Year. APN Annexation Project Total Total Property Type Date Name Units/Acres EBUS 1089-581-01 05/21/14 TR 18212 67.00 67.00 Condominiums Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3-City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P545 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2015/2016 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) P546 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 (TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Lynne B. Kennedy, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E.,Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P547 TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Letter 1 Introduction 3 Reason for Assessment Process for Annual Assessment Plans and Specifications 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District Description of Improvements and Services Map of Improvements Estimate of Costs 7 District Budget Definitions of Budget Items Method of Assessment 10 General General Benefit Special Benefit Method of Assessment Spread Assessment Diagram 13 Assessment Roll 15 Assessment Roll Annexations P548 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 15, 2015, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 15-116, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2015/16 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2015/16 Total Estimated Assessment $ 164,000.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 18 540.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 182,540.00 Less Operating Reserve Fund Contribution (37,930.00) Total Expenditure Budget $ 144,610.00 Total District EBU Count 5,663.02 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 28.96 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $ 28.96 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No.4—City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P549 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirely of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefitted Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Annual Engineer's Report, Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. ri3OFESS/04- gl Z No.C053672 01111111 * /�Ev.6.30 a , Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No.4—City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P550 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the Street Lighting Maintenance District No.4—City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2015/16 • P551 matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold a community meeting with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If the is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4—City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P552 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City known as the Terra Vista Planned Community, which is located north of Foothill Boulevard, west of Rochester Avenue, east of Haven Avenue, south of Base Line Road and includes the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Haven Avenue. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No.4—City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9z/STOZ JeaA leas!J P553 9 eSuoweDnj oipuea Jo A}ij-t7•ON P1als!a aDueualulew Bunqgn TaalIs „_______-) 7 I I I I I I-- ..4<1.1C..... r - v, Z • AV 2i31S3HOOLi ROGI . J D1 r V 'rte • • • • . _ ` l0 g O O) , C O f MA Awl” (n b � m LL • O Cn m V • Lu E CU U 9 •6 • .0. . 1 0 ;;• • • • •Q� • •r o H , ,,,,,IP-1,, 41,,,,, Z cn o C Lo Q �:,. ci erg CY) • al '. C VJ • . 0 AV N3NI11IW •• _ P thi • • 'as as w — 5 Z ) 14 >_ . r i� J 1I��4° LO Q —(V C7a 41 ce a • • • "ac: • • • a a In Ca D r._- W 5 U • • O Z Q ^ • pt�4c` ���`v 4' y 7 c- S J J °a 1 _ — f o.....4.,\ ,, ,.. E _ • _ '1144****41*********1110,. • . lopp Z y- ;�...A.s14a?5a. a 5 • • : � .e ya y 9ti1E 5,. _ oln!v,Tv!.tigll ie. •-4,— •.. • :,,,g1,;.4-1i;!3:4.01.., 'a .?'�' 9a ��... Bb a • • • • • • HAVEN / O AV N3A40 d,H P554 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2015/16 Budget Personnel Services Regular Payroll $ 13,490.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 6.340.00 Subtotal Personnel $ 19,830.00 Operations and Maintenance Training $ 190.00 Membership Dues 30.00 Operations and Maintenance 4,940.00 Equip Operations & Maintenance 500.00 Contract Services 0.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 92,520.00 Assessment Administration 22,970.00 General Overhead 3,630.00 Interfund Allocation 0.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $ 124,780.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects $ 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $ 0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $ 144,610.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 164,000.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 18.540.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 182,540.00 Less Operating Reserve Fund Contribution (37,930.00) Net Revenues/Expenditures $ 144,610.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 164,001.05 Total District EBU Count 5,663.02 Actual Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 28.96 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 28.96 Street Lighting Maintenance District No.4—City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 • Fiscal Year 2015/16 P555 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2015 Reserve Fund Balance $ 515,845.00 Use of Operating Reserve Fund — Fiscal Year 2015/16 (0.00) Operating Reserve Contribution — Fiscal Year 2015/16 37,930.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2016 Reserve Fund Balance $ 553,775.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. • Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time • employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Training: International Municipal Signal Association (ISMA) Certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light Maintenance Districts. Membership Dues: ISMA certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light and Maintenance Districts. Utilities - Telephones: This item includes the costs for master controllers for dial-in data lines for uploading, downloading and observing system operations for traffic signals. Utilities - Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the street lights and traffic signals. Street Lighting Maintenance District No.4—City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P556 Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Proiects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Street Lighting Maintenance District No.4—City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P557 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: Street Lighting Maintenance District No.4—City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P558 • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1984, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific Street Lighting Maintenance District No.4—City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P559 development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land- use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier • Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi-Family Residential 0.50 Unit Non Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code) Assessment Rate Rate per EBU Units/Acres EBUs per EBU Single Family Residential $28.96 $28.96 2,652.00 2,652.00 Multi-Family Residential 28.96 28.96 5,036.00 2,518.00 Non Residential 28.96 28.96 246.51 493.02 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No.4—City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P560 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4—City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2015/16 91/SLOZ JeaA lepsH P561 VI eSuoweonj oq ue l Jo AID—V ON 1DP1s!Q apueualu!elN Su!1ygf 1aa,ils N a, w u-) V '.,„ a L w E A C C U U) In AW` p I ►++ 41 cu F12 CL`1 fA O co i �:; — '` N I C a� 1 %� m Fe- o I if m co o s 3 0 MI i u_ Q Inv lse3 in tell I we .L i ny epuetivi3 1--------.I. j ny epuemR3 .0) ! j J j i i W i9 laaio tea ny Jatsayoo, ! n is sa o0 Ilar j y i 4 a Ay uail!II!W f._.._.._..—._..- ! Ay ua�l!II!nJ 1 1 I 1 j I I 1 ny uaneH - 1 j ny uaneH I il! -------..... i ny esow�aH j i I !ny esowwaH i AV Pleq!4oJy I j ny Pleq!uoJV I 4► i ny uewllaH 1 l -ny uewllaH I L co v I I ny PJenau!A is ueyauweo I 1 • a II i r te. 1 114 t 11114n9t 1� 1 X f all li l! L J 3• L r1 t==j 6s: al O Q ;i:Y lrl p[ 11 a3 ill 104 70 QS c lCagy WI co fill t 1 p = 2 tfiiit Willi! =ll! P562 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2015/16 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable (County Use Code) per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $28.96 2,652.00 2,652.00 $76,801.92 Multi-Family Residential 28.96 5,036.00 2,518.00 72,921.28 Non Residential 28.96 246.51 493.02 14,277.85 TOTALS 7,934.51 5,663.02 $164,001.05 *"Actual Assessment Rate per EBU" is the same as "Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate Per EBU". A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no Annexations for the 2015/16 Fiscal Year. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4—City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P563 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2015/2016 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community) P564 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 (CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tern William Alexander, Council Member Lynne B. Kennedy, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P565 TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Letter 1 Introduction 3 Reason for Assessment Process for Annual Assessment Plans and Specifications 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District Description of Improvements and Services Map of Improvements Estimate of Costs 7 District Budget Definitions of Budget Items Method of Assessment 10 General General Benefit Special Benefit Method of Assessment Spread Assessment Diagram 13 Assessment Roll 15 Assessment Roll Annexations P566 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 15, 2015 the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 15-116, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2015/16 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Ad. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2015/16 Total Estimated Assessment $ 44,150.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (70.00) • Total Estimated Revenue $ 44,080.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 37,570.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 81,650.00 Total District EBU Count 1,276.00 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 34.60 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $ 34.60 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P567 • 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirely of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefitted Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Annual Engineer's Report, Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. QPDFESSJ4 y�Q�PNDREWSTF4 kt,w No.C053672 19 Exp.636.1 7 ,I*/ CML AV Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P568 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include. vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P569 matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold a community meeting with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If the is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P570 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area located north of the 1-210 Freeway, south of Banyan Street, west of Rochester Avenue and east of Milliken Avenue, also known as the Caryn Planned Community. The boundaries also include Tract No. 13835 east of Rochester Avenue and Tracts No. 13748, 13857 & 13858 west of Milliken Avenue. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. • Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9i/StOZ JeaA lepsi j P571 9 eBuoweDn' opuea jo Alp—S •oN Pialsia a3ueua4uiew 2uily2i1 1aailS Z -44QiC 2 \ JL , 4g o _c co a oo 0) v — — m c c -0 0 O N ii, O) j O N (/J m m U m In ' L. 1 w , •_±._ . • • or i: • a . • • e • o [I • • •• • I • .„1„._____ -__.___________F—- - - .,r _. __________„. r nV UJTS3HOOU ■ it ii�1i 1111 I Lo d ill E _ . - t/1Ni I/ 1 Z •, ■ Z ��trii� i�/1�1... ti L • C9 iv�R�~ r�zr, N 1_ �11111111111111 c v a ` � ii . \iru4-\_, .....=,,,,,,2 Nu klill: _ • •• .•. ., _ , . �... Nee 4II• _ _ f 4 r. .0 P572 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2015/16 Budget Personnel Services Regular Payroll $ 4,250.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 2 000.00 Subtotal Personnel $ 6,250.00 Operations and Maintenance Training $ 180.00 Membership Dues 30.00 Operations and Maintenance 8,990.00 Equip Operations & Maintenance 0.00 Contract Services 0.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 58,080.00 Assessment Administration 7,020.00 General Overhead 1,460.00 Interfund Allocation 0.00 • Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $ 75,760.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects $ 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $ 0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $ 82,010.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 44,150.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (70.00) Total Estimated Revenue $ 44,080.00 Plus Use of Operating Reserve Fund 37,570.00 Net Revenues/Expenditures $ 81,650.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 44,149.60 Total District EBU Count 1,276.00 Actual Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 34.60 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 34.60 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P573 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2015 Reserve Fund Balance $ (44,774.00) Use of Operating Reserve Fund — Fiscal Year 2015/16 (37,930.00) Operating Reserve Contribution — Fiscal Year 2015/16 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2016 Reserve Fund Balance $ (82,344.00) Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Training: International Municipal Signal Association (ISMA) Certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light Maintenance Districts. Membership Dues: ISMA certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light and Maintenance Districts. Utilities - Telephones: This item includes the costs for master controllers for dial-in data lines for uploading, downloading and observing system operations for traffic signals. Utilities - Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the street lights and traffic signals. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P574 Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P575. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P576 • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1986, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P577 development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land- use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units IProperty Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier I Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code) Assessment Rate Rate per EBU Units/Acres EBUs per EBU Single Family Residential $34.60 $34.60 1,276 1,276 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P578 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. • Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9t/StOZ JeaA le si j P579 VI e2uoweDnJ otpuej Jo Al!O–S •oN PuTs!Q apueualu!eL 2u0y211 laaJ S ILO a) V 'i y 4 Av knatio CD (8? (-L,III/ t..) > 1 m &" o It c +-• j @ t 3 0 .. m i° Q i Av se L .L i ny epuennug � — I Ay epuemg3 th III 16, I i9 leeio Aea Jaisayoo8 " n salsa o0 p.. I y y Ll I I ny uaml!W r—.._.._.._.—._ I ny uaN!II!W i I I I I i i ny uaneH ! i i my uaneH I 11 i AV esowiaH i Ay esowJaH � I ^y Plequyoiy l II ;^y Pleg!yoiy ny uewllaH 1 ny uewllaH I L - i ny pi Aaui IS ueilawe3 1 1 1 9111 WII1 i IX J o .:c- Oggilillik Q' c m V as 111111114 a �'�/e ° : i iti i'i ajis Fi I. P580 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2015/16 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable (County Use Code) per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $34.60 1,276 1,276 $44,149.60 'Actual Assessment Rate per EBU" is the same as "Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate Per EBU". A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no annexations effective for the 2015/16 Fiscal Year. • Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5—City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P581 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2015/2016 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) P582 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 • Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tern William Alexander, Council Member Lynne B. Kennedy, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P583 TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Letter 1 Introduction 3 Reason for Assessment Process for Annual Assessment Plans and Specifications 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District Description of Improvements and Services Map of Improvements Estimate of Costs 7 District Budget Definitions of Budget Items Method of Assessment 10 General General Benefit Special Benefit Method of Assessment Spread Assessment Diagram 13 Assessment Roll 15 Assessment Roll Annexations P584 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 15, 2015, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 15-116, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2015/16 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2015/16 Total Estimated Assessment $ 134,460.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 5.790.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 140,250.00 Less Operating Reserve Contribution (23,060.00) Total Expenditure Budget $ 117,190.00 Total District EBU Count 2,615.97 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 51.40 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $ 51.40 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6—City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P585 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirely of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefitted Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Annual Engineer's Report, Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. (Ac\ OFESS pV NC053I2 9te y OW r Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6—City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P586 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6—City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P587 matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold a community meeting with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If the is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6—City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P588 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as the commercial and industrial area of the City which is generally bounded by Foothill Boulevard on the north, 4'h Street on the South, East Avenue on the east and Grove Avenue on the west. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6—City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9i/StOZ JeaA 'emu P589 g e2uowean0 01.1311911 JO AID—9 roN 1Pu4si0 aaueualuiew 8uily811 laaJTS N Z a rn Z` v Yg p a) lC C °Y 8 C 0 m ` m W U �p nVAaa3H0 CO U co ��/�.o I`�' 1 0 N //�� • 9 1111t L 8 �N`' 4hhi A V, L a o E '• _ �I T$S� iYWI!� �� ( � Z 0 nvb�l rT?Z� ni ■■f AvvaNVMI c !) r tl+ ' �! ONb ._ 3 M113 • � J _ OL •.§. 1 it C ,._ eti �,. r/'- oy x 0 N cis �...1pn—�r l is�,aa. a • 11^`_ �... ON F (� n.- ..__..., m o al, G T� _,�._ 15 (�� ;l•lir S�' `'e ra. AV a91s3HOOa 4 N i 't' ' � G► l ■" l icy b.�■(bill. celtN_ Ii=d�kaLo'3 p f(AvN3)IITIW !i1i wtl�SO!1�1' el Yr " E MI s NI Ili . R v, r� i . I 11 m In E I`�, r_ y� _ my �w 0 y c MI vs ■��1� ■ >■ dl ,' 1 O=Ea- l LAC I F - r y "b .-- p ■r r C j f' - I=�=AV OIVeIHO IV'I "Williaa*C3 N 6 i1�: sca y*' it `1 L° uEfiii iii ar` s e 9"7:.htirl: ^tl� . " �1.��� u1:..t hV N. H kip VIM r M� WI-1 391 ■r`a P E i n E llii-�1" '�l } E . .an milli y '.,� tl,,lam,, nreaS r is•IJ*19NiIV3 w I ilE1�g= ^i~ R 1 .in∎ur = t i .IR - I'. .r 1s aiHddVS I V !,,V1� v. s-Li i I A 1-1 {�I I f M� 1 a' Rilii:l11►11 e.11 "'318g11IIViE 1pii[ �;J� It s@ 11€1 4011011 P590 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2015/16 Budget Personnel Services Regular Payroll $ 13,490.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 6,340.00 Subtotal Personnel $ 19,830.00 Operations and Maintenance Training $ 180.00 Membership Dues 30.00 Operations and Maintenance 6,940.00 Equipment Operations & Maintenance 400.00 Contract Services 0.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 80,800.00 Assessment Administration 5,600.00 General Overhead 3,300.00 Interfund Allocation 0.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $ 97,360.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects $ 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $ 0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $ 117,190.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 134,460.00 Plus Anticipated Delinquencies 5.790.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 140,250.00 Less Operating Reserve Fund Contribution (23,060.00) Total Expenditure Budget $ 117,190.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 134,460.85 Total District EBU Count 2,615.97 Actual Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 51.40 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 51.40 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6—City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P591 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2015 Reserve Fund Balance $ 407,632.00 Operating Reserve Contribution — Fiscal Year 2015/16 0.00 Operating Reserve Collection — Fiscal Year 2015/16 23,060.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2016 Reserve Fund Balance $ 430,692.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Training: International Municipal Signal Association (ISMA) Certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light Maintenance Districts. Membership Dues: ISMA certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light and Maintenance Districts. Utilities - Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the street lights and traffic signals. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6—City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P592 District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6—City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P593 • METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement' (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6—City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P594 • improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1987, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6—City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P595 development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land- use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units IProperty Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier I Non Residential 1.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code) Assessment Rate Rate per EBU Units/Acres EBUs per EBU Non Residential $51.40 $51.40 2,615.87 2,615.87 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6—City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P596 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6—City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9T/STOZ JeaA leos!i P597 VT eBuowe3nj oyDuea 40 Al!O—9 'oN P!Jls!Q aaueualu!el,l 2u!l1 !1 lea-QS CO aN, 4}.+ 2 U) `0.• E G) S c +1` N U En o Ay AJJaya a C� N c El g co p O N- nv iSe3 6 vied I \ v .= i ny epuenn!i3 ny epuenn!i3 en i J i i 4) i8 )IeeJ3 l ea \ ny Jaisayooa i n Jalsa o0 i d 4 b i AV ual!II!W f--------- ny ua){!II!W ny uaneH AV uaneH Ay esoWJ$H = ny esowJOH AV Pleq!40Jy ny Pleq!4oib ny uewilaH - ny uewllaH v) -c L vr 1 e ny pie 1 is ue!lawea lilillilltil ce a IIT _ _ _ A aAOJ #a(ba P Cl) C [Y) Q' to jb fi;ld a s O a0 $1011;11 fel,�J! gl c m li Q gr cr co 41 Ii.4.44 70 c cn (o e �it'l'iii� 2' - EDaaa 1 "_ tijiii1C=ii1 Y- 111121:11f1 gg ••`•• M311! 1 12 P598 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2015/16 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable (County Use Code) per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Non Residential $51.40 2,615.87 2,615.87 $134,460.85 TOTALS 2,615.87 2,615.87 $134,460.85 'Actual Assessment Rate per EBU" is the same as "Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate Per EBU". A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following Annexations are effective for the 2015/16 Fiscal Year. APN Annexation Project Name Total Total Property Date Units/Acres EBUS Type 0229-262-01, 05/21/14 DRC2008- 5.53 5.53 Non- 31 00185 Residential 0229-131-04, 05/21/14 PM 19448 74.75 74.75 Non- 17 & 25 Residential 0229-171-01 11/19/14 DRC2012- 4.77 4.77 Non- 00878 Residential Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6—City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P599 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2015/2016 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) P600 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem William Alexander, Council Member Lynne B. Kennedy, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P601 TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Letter 1 Introduction 3 Reason for Assessment Process for Annual Assessment Plans and Specifications 5 Description of the Boundaries of the District Description of Improvements and Services Map of Improvements Estimate of Costs 7 District Budget Definitions of Budget Items Method of Assessment 10 General General Benefit Special Benefit Method of Assessment Spread Assessment Diagram 13 Assessment Roll 15 Assessment Roll Annexations P6O2 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 15, 2015, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 15-116, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2015/16 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT Fiscal Year 2015/16 Total Estimated Assessment $ 126,010.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (330.00) Total Estimated Revenue $ 125,680.00 Transfer In-Fund 105,100.00 Total Expenditure Budget $ 230,780.00 Total District EDU Count 3,782.00 Actual Assessment per EDU $ 33.32 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EDU $ 33.32 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited.Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P603 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirely of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefitted Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Annual Engineer's Report, Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. soFESS,4 �OREWs�Fyn tdcJ No.C053672 1st Exp.6-30- 2 7 / aiL / Iii i . CNII �; i� � �e1iT�,... 0///... Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P604 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P605 matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold a • community meeting with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If the is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P606 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City known as North Etiwanda, which is generally bounded by Highland Avenue on the south, Day Creek Channel on the west and City limits on the east and north. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9T/STOZ.IeaA leJsid P607 9 auowepnj otpuej jo Alij— L •oN TJuTsia aJueualu!ew Sui4118i1 laaJTS Z dYyo--/ 2 s co a r = c c v 0 se. ali _0) o c lil !j U - a cn IL (f) 0 AVA8H`1 \__ • o � N < i C a ✓v�n�� I a) \ Eft 0 • c32,e\A li ' � r i=Li, Z L D O 110116 , j j -- 1 0. 7 1 �� �_ r �R aa�oo��ne rovwaavnn '�j C) to _ 1111111_ . a) --= a t0 - 917.11.E •RS O 1IU'iI r �.. a , } � E 111 I Z $ 41 C_ ' ■ ' m AV isVa g ul :47; vs in J = N i I j 11�� O _, .= I - --•-- i ir mi 117t,,, 1-0 J f 1■�i O C VA A , Nd1 V VONVMJIa ir A VONVMLL3 a— _ whisVill ++ U) CD la s II. N : q tell . - trvior ift.an,i , 111 111115 I pAitig , ow* ., iii,: mt...., ___ .....T.' taillijk I k +444k)%66 16 PIM . i 011111411111111J1 I I'Ali 6•fr 1 s t- ' ipor 190433e13-'Ar lit ( ' ..■ i c4 I I I I I I I P608 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2015/16 Budget Personnel Services Regular Payroll $ 13,490.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 6.340.00 Subtotal Personnel $ 19,830.00 Operations and Maintenance Training $ 180.00 Membership Dues 30.00 Operations and Maintenance 4,940.00 Equipment Operations & Maintenance 0.00 Contract Services 0.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 181,800.00 Assessment Administration 20,810.00 General Overhead 3,760.00 Interfund Allocation 0.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $ 211,520.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects $ 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $ 0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $ 231,350.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 126,010.00 Less Anticipated Delinquencies (330.00) Total Estimated Revenue $ 125,680.00 Transfer In-Fund 105,100.00 Net Revenues/Expenditures $ 230,780.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 126,016.24 Total District EDU Count 3,782.00 Actual Assessment per EDU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 33.32 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EDU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 33.32 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P6O9 The maximum allowable assessment per EDU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EDU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2015 Reserve Fund Balance $ (35,854).00) Use of Operating Reserve Fund — Fiscal Year 2015/16 0.00 Operating Reserve Contribution — Fiscal Year 2015/16 0.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2016 Reserve Fund Balance $ (35,854.00) Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, • vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Training: International Municipal Signal Association (ISMA) Certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light Maintenance Districts. Membership Dues: ISMA certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light and Maintenance Districts. Utilities - Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the street lights and traffic signals. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P610 District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Proiects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P611 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: Street Lighting Maintenance District No.7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P612 • improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1990, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P613 development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land- use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EDU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EDU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi-family Residential 0.50 Unit Non Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EDU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EDU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code) Assessment Rate Rate per EDU Units/Acres EDUs per EDU Single Family Residential $33.32 $33.32 3,782.00 3,782.00 Multi-family Residential 33.32 33.32 0.00 0.00 Non Residential 33.32 33.32 0.00 0.00 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P614 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9T/STOZ aeaA leas!d P61 5 VI e2uoweanj oyaueH Jo til!O—L •ON p !J4s!a aaueualu!elAJ 2u!Ty2!1 halls w y • 10 V r •y >�e. J n 4 C J a v 42 a $ !1'ti c U 0 CG [7:: 44 ny ti�ay° J 'I i C _ N m t 3 0 u_ Q iit Av ise3 6 e Is i AV epueM!13 w I 0 i UN AV Jai:594008 1.1 n jalsa ao AV uavII!W ,-.._.._..--- .ny uaN!ll!W 1 ii 1 1 i I j i Ay uaneH i 4 i � i my uaneH i il i ny esowJOH i i ny eso Lai aH AV Pleq!yalV i . I i �: ;Ay Pleq!40J`d ' 'r I ny uewllaH i ny uewllaH I i ny paeA(au!n is uegaweo r 1 i i i Iia I T4p r••�••r Ay 9n0J0 ;'IiHffluI • fF� �..� J s O OO i_{s ;11=bqi �..�..�.r•• T O ` It -a (n c4 o Q � a ! F 1 o! @ CO u_ i zsi pa/ F 73 c N (0 sill •o"I 8 CO 6 I II 11=IIea �•••,• ` 113I II IIl°affil Wig!? Ill P616 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2015/16 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable • (County Use Code) per EDU Units/Acres EDUs Assessment Single Family Residential $33.32 3,782.00 3,782.00 $126,016.24 Multi-family Residential 33.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 Non Residential 33.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTALS 3,782.00 3,782.00 $126,016.24 *"Actual Assessment Rate per EBU" is the same as "Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate Per EBU". A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following Annexations are effective for the 2015/16 Fiscal Year. APN Annexatio Project Total Total Property Type n Date Name Units/Acres EBUS 0226-081-06 02/05/14 TR18741 53.00 53.00 Single Family . Residential 0225-191-03, 04/16/14 TR 18122 76.00 76.00 Single Family 04, 13, 15 & Residential 20 0225-381-06 11/05/14 TR 18034 7.00 7.00 Single Family Residential Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7—City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P617 Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2015/2016 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) P618 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2740 Fax: 909.477.2741 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tern William Alexander, Council Member Lynne B. Kennedy, Council Member Diane Williams, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director/Department of Innovation & Technology Christopher Bopko, Management Analyst III P619 TABLE OF CONTENTS Engineer's Letter 1 Introduction 3 Reason for Assessment Process for Annual Assessment Plans and Specifications 6 Description of the Boundaries of the District Description of Improvements and Services Map of Improvements Estimate of Costs 23 District Budget Definitions of Budget Items Method of Assessment 26 General General Benefit Special Benefit Method of Assessment Spread Assessment Diagram 30 Assessment Roil 32 Assessment Roll Annexations P620 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 15, 2015, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 15-116, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed NBS to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2015/16 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT • Fiscal Year 2015/16 Total Estimated Assessment $ 70,430.00 Plus Interest Earned 24.180.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 94,610.00 Less Operating Reserve Fund Contribution (1,130.00) Total Expenditure Budget $ 93,480.00 Total District EBU Count 2,301.78 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 30.60 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU $ 30.60 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P621 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirely of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefitted Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Annual Engineer's Report, Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. QQOFESS/pi W=CV ci 4 t2 No.C059672 s `mss 6,96} ! 7 • ��\ESL-,: - CAL1E% Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engine- .• ervices/City Engineer • Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8-City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P622 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of any improvement. Servicing shall also include vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the assessment district for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the assessment district by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the district. • Refers to the report of the engineer, on file with the clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the Street Lighting Maintenance District No.8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P623 matters provided in the report, including changes in the improvements, any zones within the assessment district, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below. The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing ("Notice"), which describes, along with other mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments, and to provide a date and time of a public hearing to be held on the matter. The City must also prepare an assessment ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot either in favor of, or in opposition to the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public hearing date as shown in the Notice. The City may also hold a community meeting with the property owners to discuss the issues facing the District and to answer property owner questions directly. After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the public hearing, property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask questions or voice their concerns. At the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount on each property and the results are announced by the City Council. Article XIII D provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to levy and collect the assessments as proposed. A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment. All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel. If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed assessments. If the is a majority protest, as described above, the City will not levy and collect any assessments. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P624 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City known as South Etiwanda, which is generally bounded by Etiwanda Avenue on the west, Highland Avenue on the north and Foothill Boulevard on the south. The southern portion of the District is bounded by East Avenue on the east and the northern portion of the District is bounded by the 1-15 Freeway on the east. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2015/16 I I—,�. ■ )\----- 025 0 �J Lo_. .}� Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 °aaciNiu Street Lights and Traffic Signals Improvements• ...: 12io Fw 1 V i l zoo wes7 wP HIGH • a AV HIG ! a� 146 OU7Hl•'.•M - 1 5 Ivo - . 111111111111Winil '_ -"VIM.= . Eli "MI ' - - Ili 4'H iRAMP -VOI FM �2 le i il I NI I , , lur .a r ...., , _ _ ,. „____. ..„.__. ., , • _.4 ._,_ . , ,. ..,. • ., , : . ......._. • IMNDRO'f.'S liii PARK ma MO ! 1 I II ( rr r :11 -•-J- 11 mom' , .i.l... 1))7 . r 1 /1111 11111611 ■VICTORIA ST 4 Ini • • A. = 1O.- • BASE LINE RD - /le ir O 4),_ on�•• L :;mg , yore w minima■ _ PIA MOORE 11„ 11'g 0 • - nMrc 2 m11 116 1111111• ��.. WI ary _ The maps,data and geographic information("Information") •MIL_ / available by and through the City of Rancho Cucamonga OUl a 1 IIIINIIII11 I. i , - are presented as a public resource of general information. 1-P - ,4 The City r of Rancho Cucamonga nutkes nor implies no :, .:,- warranty,re presentation or guarantee as to the content, 7�// sequence,accuracy completeness or timeliness of any lir O ✓ / Infomiati on provided to you herein.The user should not rely Li CHl//Z ^ _ upon the Information for any reason and is directed to r b ei■ independently verify any and all Information presented herein. I The City of Rancho Cucamonga explicitly and without limitation '�1 disdsims any and all representations c dwarrantees,including, r but not limited to,the implied warranties of merchantability and -- _ '::= fitness for a particular purpose.The City of Rancho Cucamonga I shall neither accept nor assume any liability,regardless of the causation for(1)any errors,omissions or inaccuracies in 16111di any information provided ns reliance(ii)any action or inaction occurring due to any persons relimce upon the Information available herein. IL:J'i OMQA PAntt/ r A in_ • g _ SCE Streetlights '/ 'w�1� { 1 I 1 i i I em o Traffic Signal Lights I■ FOOTHILL BL , :711771 I rri SLD8 Boundary 0 0.225 0.45 0.9 Mile --------- City Boundary OIL*woo.e9,/9 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P626 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Estimated 2015/16 Budget Personnel Services Regular Payroll $ 12,080.00 Part-time Salaries 0.00 Fringe Benefits 5.680.00 Subtotal Personnel $ 17,760.00 Operations and Maintenance Training $ 180.00 Membership Dues 30.00 Operations and Maintenance 4,940.00 Equipment Operations & Maintenance 0.00 Contract Services 0.00 Utilities Telephone Utilities 0.00 Electric Utilities 57,120.00 Assessment Administration 10,030.00 General Overhead 3,420.00 Interfund Allocation 0.00 Subtotal Operations and Maintenance $ 75,720.00 Capital Expenditures Capital Projects $ 0.00 Subtotal Capital Expenditures $ 0.00 Total District Expenditure Budget $ 93,480.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 70,430.00 Plus Interest Earned 24,180.00 Total Estimated Revenue $ 94,610.00 Less Operating Reserve Fund Contribution (1,130.00) Net Revenues/Expenditures $ 93,480.00 Total Estimated Assessment $ 70,434.46 Total District EBU Count 2,301.78 Actual Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 30.60 Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU — Fiscal Year 2015/16 $ 30.60 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P627 The maximum allowable assessment per EBU listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2015 Reserve Fund Balance $ 1,996,065.00 Use of Operating Reserve Fund - Fiscal Year 2015/16 0.00 Operating Reserve Contribution - Fiscal Year 2015/16 1,130.00 Estimated Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2016 Reserve Fund Balance $ 1,997,195.00 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services Regular Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Part Time Salaries: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all part time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Fringe Benefits: This item includes the benefits available to City employees: health care, vacation, sick time, and retirement fund. Operations and Maintenance Training: International Municipal Signal Association (ISMA) Certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light Maintenance Districts. Membership Dues: ISMA certification. The cost is split evenly between all of the City's Street Light and Maintenance Districts. Utilities - Electric: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the street lights and traffic signals. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8-City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P628 District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual engineer's report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all departments and staff of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational assessment district within the City's administrative structure. Capital Expenditures: Capital Projects: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Operating Reserve Collection: Operating Reserve Collection: This item includes the amount to be collected to maintain reserves to enable the City to pay for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The Reserve Fund contribution will continue until such a time the Reserve Fund balance is approximately one half of the annual costs. The fund may be allowed to accumulate in anticipation of any unforeseen expenses not included in the yearly maintenance costs. This may include, but is not limited to, tree replacements, repair of damaged equipment due to vandalism, storms and other similar events. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P629 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT General Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22547). Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P63O • improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District However it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed in 1990, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since the 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P631 development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land- use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi-family Residential 0.50 Unit _ Non Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Property Type Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Total Total (County Use Code) Assessment Rate Rate per EBU Units/Acres EBUs per EBU Single Family Residential $193.75 $30.60 1,171.00 1,171.00 Multi-family Residential 193.75 30.60 1,057.00 1,057.00 Non Residential 193.75 30.60 31.89 63.78 Church 193.75 30.60 5.00 10.00 TOTAL 2,264.89 2,301.78 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P632 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. • • Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8—City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2015/16 9T/StOZ aea,A leDs!j P633 VT eBuoweanJ oyPuea Jo AT!O—g ON iDuls!G aaueualu!ew 8u!ly8!1 laaals 00 a) v If) V •1... a 4 V▪ ) ` °O c....)' D Q o to V { t �} ny A�Jay° a) CI, CO I ti cc 1 1 N t ._ m o 0 Lo. 03 i Z i �ny;se3 in ire i C.) I t •C i ny epuenn!IJ 1"""—'1 ny epuem!13 .CO ! ! J I 1, I )8 4aaJ j Aea . ny Jalsayoob i A 110,4 y y salsa o0 4 � 1 4 ny uavll!W f._.._.._..----= ! ny uam!II!W i 0 ! ! i ny uaneH ! ! Inv uaneH i 'i_ i AV esowieH ! — !ny esowJaH ! i ^y PIe9!434y i^y pleilyo4V i ny uewllaH ny uewllaH ! N f !ny p eAau!n 1S ue!lawe3 i • i 1 ` '-p. fs`EPi �E! I ,,..,..,._/-. c-2 _ _ i(.7) c m i ji1I{Ijfflj cr c m w Q pgjii as a) c agGE!gg u) ca tl�' ee E m � a f pp a e:', ±? i il8.�#ifl P634 ASSESSMENT ROLL Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2015/16 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2015/16 maximum and actual assessments for the District: Maximum Allowable Maximum Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Allowable (County Use Code) per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $193.75 1,171.00 1,171.00 $226,881.25 Multi-family Residential 193.75 1,057.00 1,057.00 204,793.75 Non Residential 193.75 31.89 63.78 12,357.37 Church 193.75 5.00 10.00 1,937.50 TOTALS 2,264.89 2,301.78 $445,969.37 Actual Property Type Assessment Rate Total Total Actual (County Use Code) per EBU Units/Acres EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $30.60 1,171.00 1,171.00 $35,832.60 Multi-family Residential 30.60 1,057.00 1,057.00 32,344.20 Non Residential 30.60 31.89 63.78 1,951.66 Church 30.60 5.00 10.00 306.00 TOTALS 2,264.89 2,301.78 $70,434.46 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following Annexations are effective for the 2015/16 Fiscal Year. APN Annexation Project Total Total Property Type Date Name Units/Acres EBUS 0227-121-33 08/20/14 TR 16578 6.00 6.00 Single Family & 37 Residential Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8-City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2015/16 P635 STAFF REPORT LIBRARY SERVICES Lit RANCHO Date: August 5, 2015 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Michelle Perera , Library Director Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE PAUL BIANE LIBRARY SECOND FLOOR TENANT IMPROVEMENTS, TO BE FUNDED FROM LIBRARY FUNDS (1329601-5650) FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PROJECT RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve specifications for the construction of Paul A. Biane Library Second Floor Tenant Improvements and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids" to be funded from Library funds (1329601-5650) for construction of said project. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Biane Library opened as part of the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center in 2006 with a 13,500 sq. ft. undeveloped second floor. Through careful analysis of programs and services, as well as a needs assessment, the Library will ultimately develop the second floor into a children's interactive discovery space. In order to prepare for that future phase of the project, Phase I will need to be completed first. This project, Phase I, will consist of tenant improvements and development of specialized programming spaces to the 13,500 sq. ft. of space on the second floor. Included in Phase I will be a classroom, early learning room, art room, STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) lab, a large open programming space, and administration area. These programming spaces will not only be highlights of the future interactive discovery space, but will serve the library well in the interim — providing much needed programming space for programs already over capacity. This project will provide tenants improvements and programming space for the second floor at the Paul A. Biane Library. The project will be funded from Library Funds (329). Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt per Article 19, Section 15301(c) of the CEQA guidelines. P636 CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE"NOTICE PAGE 2 INVITING BIDS" FOR THE PAUL BIANE LIBRARY SECOND FLOOR 1 ENANT IMPROVEMENTS, TO BE FUNDED FROM LIBRARY FUNDS (1329601-5650) FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PROJECT. AUGUST 5, 2015 The Engineer's estimate is $2,200,000 and will be funded by library funds. Legal advertising is scheduled for August 18, 2015, August 25, 2015, and September 1, 2015, with bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday September 22, 2015, unless extended by addendum. Respectfully submitted, frd_21.1-3 Michelle Perera Library Director Attachments P637 RESOLUTION NO. 15-159 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "PAUL BIANE LIBRARY SECOND FLOOR TENANT IMPROVEMENTS" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the "PAUL BIANE LIBRARY SECOND FLOOR TENANT IMPROVEMENTS ". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, September 22, 2015, sealed bids or proposals for the "PAUL BIANE LIBRARY SECOND FLOOR TENANT IMPROVEMENTS" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of the PAUL BIANE LIBRARY SECOND FLOOR TENANT IMPROVEMENTS". A mandatory pre-bid meeting and site tour will be held on Wednesday, September 2, 2015, beginning at 2 p.m. at the Paul A. Biane Library located at 12505 Cultural Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91739 PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Resolution No. 15-159 - Page 1 of 5 P638 Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk, City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. They can also be found at www.dir.ca.gov/ under the "Statistics and Research" Tab. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. No contractor or subcontractor may be listed on a bid proposal for a public works project (submitted on or after March 1, 2015) unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5 (with limited exceptions from this requirement for bid purposes only under Labor Code section 1771.1(a)). No contractor or subcontractor may be awarded a contract for public work on a public works project (awarded on or after April 1, 2015) unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5. This project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations. For all new projects awarded on or after April 1, 2015, the contractors and subcontractors must furnish electronic certified payroll records to the Labor Commissioner. The requirement to furnish electronic certified payroll records to the Labor Commissioner will apply to all public works projects, whether new or ongoing, beginning January 1, 2016. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than two hundred dollars ($200.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or Resolution No. 15-159 - Page 2 of 5 P639 D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor or Subcontractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each worker employed in the execution of the contract by the respective contractor or subcontractor for each calendar day during which the worker is required or permitted to work more than 8 hours in any one calendar day and 40 hours in any one calendar week in violation of the provisions of this article. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.1. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. Resolution No. 15-159 - Page 3 of 5 P64O Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; including, but not limited to, a Class "B" License (General Building Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. In an effort to go green and paperless, digital copies of the plans, specifications, and bid proposal, including any future addenda or revisions to the bid documents, are available by going to www.ciplist.com and signing up, by going to Member Login or Member Signup (it's free), then choose California, then scroll down to San Bernardino County and click on Browse Cities, then scroll down to Rancho Cucamonga and click on City Projects, then click on the Project of interest under the Title and follow directions for download. Note, copies of the plans, specifications, bid proposal, addendums and revisions will not be provided, digital copies must be downloaded from the above website then printed. Prospective bidders must register for an account on www.ciplist.com to be included on the prospective bidder's list(s) and to receive email updates of any addenda or revisions to the bid documents. Be advised that the information contained on this site may change over time and without notice to prospective bidders or registered users. While effort is made to keep information current and accurate and to notify registered prospective bidders of any changes to the bid documents, it is the responsibility of each prospective bidder to register with www.ciplist.com and to check this website on a DAILY basis through the close of bids for any applicable addenda or updates. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to registered prospective bidders from www.ciplist.com. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, reserves the right to reject any or all bids. Resolution No. 15-159 - Page 4 of 5 P641 Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for the "PAUL BIANE LIBRARY SECOND FLOOR TENANT IMPROVEMENTS" may be directed to: MICHELLE PERERA, LIBRARY DIRECTOR 12505 Cultural Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909) 477-2720, ext. 5055 E-mail: Michelle.Perera @cityofrc.us All questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids must be in writing (e-mail is acceptable) and'received by the City no later than 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, September 10, 2015. The Library Services Department is not responsible for questions undeliverable. ADVERTISE ON: August 18, 2015, August 25, 2015 and September 1, 2015 Resolution No. 15-159 - Page 5 of 5 P• , 2 NI(CAO. "---- We[ Y 1 C. NH� ,_SYSfDA WILSON AV < __ J._. --- CANYON YOUNGS CA RD AVE al II rowni',1� HIGNLWD AVE. W FlSN ' _�.191M1 St. � NCL RU �I 11-'-- > x R G7 T d VICTORIA St FMRMON ; A an maw 3 FONTANA PI ab .1 si,'. FOOTHILL BLVD.m�` } �I`� i .,..., �t�ilA i'I ■ PROJECT MOIR A 1� {3 LOCATION • -w JERSEY BLVD. /_-. VHIIRAM AVE P ��' AT & SFRR T ' Bth REET , i 71M1 STREET Mkt g 15 6M1E _ Ri If DNGA ONTARIO PARK ® 1-10 FREEWAY / cm CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA eAl 1 «' PAUL BIANE LIBRARY `� NCH J. RANCHO SECOND FLOOR TENANT IMPROVEMENTS `� \ 0.1CANION;A Rancho Cucamonga Library Second Floor City Council Meeting-August 5, 2015 Background •Library opened 2006 •Second floor shell space •Programming attendance doubled •Second floor needs assessment 2009 •Conceptual plan of service developed – Children’s Interactive Discovery Space •2014-present –City Council goal •Today -Phase I •Art Room •Early Learning Space •Classroom •STEM Lab •6,500 square feet of flexible programming space •Admin and Storage •Elevator/Staircase, HVAC, Plumbing and Electrical Systems Phase I Art Room 30 Programs / 750 attendees in 2013-2015 •Painting •Recycle Art •Mosaics •Murals •Pop Art •Modern Art •Watercolors •Scratch Art, •Self-portraits •Painting to Music •Cave Painting, and more STEM Lab (Science, Technology, Engineering, Math) 50 Programs / 1600 attendees in 2013-2015 •Legos •3D Printing •Video Game Design •Structures and Buildings •Space/Planetarium •DJing and Music Creation •Circuits •Physics/Gravity •Genetics and more! Early Learning Space 800 early learning programs 27,000 attendees in FY 2014-2015 •Family Storytimes •Pajama Storytimes •Mother Goose on the Loose •Rhyme Time •Bright Beginnings •Terrific Tots •Hooray for Pre-K •Play and Learn Workshops Large Flexible Programming Space Summer Reading Club 2015 •7 weeks –7,000 attending programs •Timeline September 2015 –out to bid October 2015 –award contract November 2015 –construction begins December 2015 –holiday closure Fall 2016 –completion •Library hours •Impact to service Phase I –Logistics Rancho Cucamonga Library Second Floor Questions? P643 STAFF REPORT RANCHO CUCAMIONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 1A-00 Date: August 5, 2015 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager/ Chief Executive Officer From: Mike Costello, Fire Chief By: Rob Ball, Fire Marshal Subject: Consideration of the Waiver of Inspection and Permit Fees for FY 2015-16 RECOMMENDATION Fire District staff is asking the Board to consider approving Resolution FD 15-021, which waives the collection of certain inspection and permit fees that were previously approved by the Board and which would otherwise be collected. BACKGROUND Resolution FD 13-032, approved two years ago by the Board, requires the District to complete an annual analysis of the approved fees and charges to determine if there is a current need to collect the fees and charges, in whole or in part, to meet the fiscal needs of the District. Upon completion and presentation of this analysis, the Board is required to direct staff, by means of a resolution, regarding the collection of fees for the current fiscal year. ANALYSIS Pursuant to Resolution FD 13-032, staff conducted a review of currently approved fees and charges in conjunction with the preparation with the fiscal year 2015-16 budget. Staff determined that the existing financial condition of the District is such that there does not exist a fiscal need to collect certain inspection and permit fees. As such, the District's budget for fiscal year 2015-16 was prepared without including certain inspection and permit fees as projected revenue. Since the budget does not anticipate the collection of certain fees and charges, a resolution has been prepared for the Board's consideration that will direct staff to waive the collection of certain fees and charges for fiscal year 2015-16. Consistent with the previous fiscal years, the fees that will not be collected this fiscal year are the fees previously approved for: 1) Recurring inspection fees for facilities such as apartment buildings, hospitals, and medical care businesses. These are buildings and businesses that are regularly inspected, either by State mandate or by way of being identified as high hazard facilities, which do not require a Fire Code Operating Permit 2) Fees associated with Fire Code Operating Permits for certain hazardous and high risk business operations that the Fire Code requires to be permitted by the local fire department. The permitting process anticipates that the business and its associated operations will be inspected on a regular basis to ensure compliance with all of the safety requirements for the particular operation or occupancy as conditioned by the permit. P644 The entire schedule of fees that will not be collected this fiscal year is included in Exhibit A of the resolution. Fees that will continue to be collected include: • Special Use Inspection Fees such as fees for special events, fireworks shows, carnivals, particularly hazardous situations such as open burning and roof work that require oversight by Prevention Specialists, and re-inspection and standby fees. These fees are generally associated with the need to pay overtime to the Prevention Specialists who inspect these one-time activities and events, typically during non-business hours. • Special Services Fees such as fees for Community Facilities District (CFD) annexations and fees for false or unwanted alarms. The annexation fees cover the cost of processing annexations into the CFD and the false alarm fees are a deterrent mechanism. • Fees for District Supplied Signs and Equipment such as the cost recovery fees for District supplied padlocks that secure and provide firefighter access to gates throughout the Fire District and the District created signs that let firefighters know where access is obstructed, where ladder points for roof access are located, and where photovoltaic systems have been installed. It is certainly worth noting that a waiver of the collection of inspection and permit fees will have a positive economic impact in the community. Business revenues that would otherwise have been set aside for permit or inspection fees can be invested in the business, its employees, and the community. SUMMARY Staff has completed the required analysis of the fiscal needs of the District and has determined that there does not exist a need to collect certain inspection and permit fees. It is recommended that the Board approve Resolution FD 15-021 to waive the collection of certain fees and charges for fiscal year 2015-16. • Respectfully submitted, Mike Costello Fire Chief P645 RESOLUTION NO. FD 15-021 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, WAIVING THE COLLECTION OF SPECIFIC FEES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015-16. A. RECITALS. (i) In accordance with Resolution No. FD 13-032 and in conjunction with the development of the annual budget for fiscal year 2015-16, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District conducted a review of current fees and charges. (H) The budget for fiscal year 2015-16 has been approved in accordance with and as required by law. (iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. RESOLUTION. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District hereby finds and resolves as follows: 1. The facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A of this Resolution, are true and correct. 2. The fees identified in Exhibit A were previously approved by the Board of Directors in accordance with all legal requirements for the adoption of fees for service. 3. For fiscal year 2015-16, there does not exist a fiscal need to collect the fees identified in Exhibit A. 4. Based on the foregoing, the Board of Directors hereby waives the collection of the fees identified in Exhibit A for fiscal year 2015-16. 5. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Please see the following page for formal adoption, certification and signatures. P646 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of August 2015. L. Dennis Michael, President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary I, Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District at a Regular Meeting of said District held on this day of , 2015. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary P647 Fire District Resolution 15-021 Exhibit A • Inspection and Permit Fees that will not be collected for Fiscal Year 2015-16 Recurring Inspection Fees Apartment Building/Complex Annual Inspection Buildings with 3 or 4 units 165 Buildings with 5 to 7 units 220 Buildings with 8 units 330 Each additional dwelling unit (per unit) 11 Condominium Complex Annual Inspection 330 High Rise Building annual inspection (per hour) 110 Hotel/Motel Annual Inspection First 10 rooms 330 Each additional dwelling unit (per unit) 11 Licensed Care Facility Pre-inspection -25 or fewer residents 50 Pre-inspection - more than 25 residents 100 Annual Inspection Home Car Facility(more than six) 220 Commercial facility- first 10 rooms 330 Commercial facility- each additional room 11 Large Family Day Care annual inspection 110 Adult/Child Care Facility(Group 1-4 occupancies) 330 Private School/Large Child Care Facility(Group E occupancy) Small School - Less than 50 children 220 Large School - 50 or more children 330 Medical Facility Hospital/ Nursing Home (Group 1-2.1) 660 Clinic 220 Ambulatory Care Facility(group 1-2.1) 330 Alternate Method Annual Inspection (per hour) 110 Fire Code Operational Permit Fees Access Control Commercial 165 Residential (requires monthly testing) 550 Aerosol Products 550 Ambulatory Health Care Facility 220 Amusement Building 275 Aviation Facility Servicing or Repair 550 Fuel Servicing Vehicles 220 Battery Charging Operation 220 Cellulose Nitrate Film 330 Combustible Dust Producing Operations 5,000 square feet or less 275 5,001 to 15,000 square feet 550 More than 15,000 square feet 715 P648 Combustible Fibers 275 Commercial Cooking Operation 220 Compressed Gases Corrosive greater than 200 cubic feet 330 Flammable greater than 200 cubic feet 330 Highly toxic - any amount 330 Inert/Simple Asphyxiant greater than 6,000 cu ft 330 Irritant greater than 200 cubic feet 330 Medical Use Gases - Less than Table 105.6.8 Portable cylinders 165 Piped system 220 Other Health Hazard greater than 650 cubic feet 330 Oxidizing/oxygen greater than 504 cubic feet 330 Pyrophoric - any amount 330 Radioactive - any amount 330 Sensitizer greater than 200 cubic feet 330 Toxic - any amount 330 Unstable reactive - any amount 330 Covered Mall Building 658 Cryogenic Fluids 330 Cutting and Welding 275 Delayed Egress 165 Dipping Operations 330 Dry Cleaning Plant Small - 1 or 2 machines 220 Medium - 3 or 4 machines 330 Large - 5 or more machines 715 Explosives Process, manufacture, store, or sell 345 Use 240 Fire Alarm Services $10/acct Fire Hydrants and Valves 165 Flammable and Combustible Liquids • 165 Class I liquids in excess of 5 gal. in a building; 10 gal. outside of a building 165 Class II or Class IIIA in excess of 25 gal. in a building; 60 gal. outside of a building 250 gallons or less over max allowable quantity 550 251-500 gallons over max allowable quantity 578 501-1,000 gallons over max allowable quantity 605 1,001-5,000 gallons over max allowable quantity 633 5,001-10,000 gallons over max allowable quantity 660 More than 10,000 gallons over max allowable quantity 688 Remove Class I or Class II from a UST 936 Operate tank vehicles, etc 330 Place a tank out of service 936 Change contents 550 Manufacture, Process, Blend, Refine 1,128 Dispensing at Commercial, Industrial, Gov't site 330 Dispense -Tank vehicle to fuel tank 330 Use or Operate a pipeline within a facility 743 P649 Floor Finishing in excess of 350 sq ft with Class I or II liquids Commercial/ Industrial 240 Residential 136 Fruit and Crop Ripening 550 Hazardous Materials in excess of amounts listed in Table 105.6.2 Gallons -250 or fewer 550 Gallons -251-500 578 Gallons -501-1,000 605 Gallons - 1,001-5,000 633 Gallons - 5,001-10,000 660 Gallons - More than 10,000 688 Pounds - 1,000 or fewer 550 Pounds - 1,001-5,000 578 Pounds - 5,001-10,000 605 Pounds - 10,001-25,000 633 Pounds - 25,001-50,000 660 Pounds - More than 50,000 688 Cubic feet- 500 or fewer 550 Cubic feet- 501-2,000 578 Cubic feet- 2,001-5,000 605 Cubic feet- 5,001-10,000 633 Cubic feet - 10,001-25,000 660 Cubic feet - More than 25,000 688 HPM Facilities 440 High Piled Combustible Storage in excess of 500 square feet 500-75,000 square feet 550 75,001-500,000 square feet 605 More than 500,000 square feet 660 Hot Work Hot Work Fixed Site 275 Hot Work Operations 220 Hot Work Program 165 Industrial Facility/Shop Includes all required permits; if actual fees are lower, actual fees will apply 2,500 square feet or less 240 2,501-5,000 square feet 330 5,001-15,000 square feet 550 15,001-50,000 square feet 743 More than 50,000 square feet- Actual permit fees Industrial Ovens 330 Large Family Day Care 110 Liquid- or Gas-Fueled vehicles or equipment in Assembly area or occupancy 165 LP-gas Store, Use, Handle, Dispense, Sell 220 Industrial Trucks and Equipment Only (4 cylinder maximum) 165 Cylinder Exchange only 110 Live Audience 240 Lumber Yard and/or Wood Working Plant 440 Magnesium 330 Miscellaneous Combustible Storage 220 Motor Fuel Dispensing Facility- Commercial 330 P650 • Motor Fuel Dispensing Facility- Residential 110 Open Flames Open Flames and torches for paint removal 110 Open Flames and torches in a hazardous fire area 110 Open Flames and candles in Assembly and Education occupancies 110 Organic Coatings 330 Pallet Storage 275 Place of Assembly A-1 Theaters, Concert Halls, Auditoriums 440 A-2 Banquet Halls, Night Clubs, Restaurants, Taverns, Bars 330 A-3 Places of Worship, Recreation, Amusement 330 A-4 Indoor sports arenas and similar-fixed seats 440 A-5 Outdoor assembly area and/or use 660 Powder Coating 330 Private Fire Hydrant 165 Production Facility 385 Pyrotechnical Special Effects Material (see Fireworks) Pyroxylin Plastics 440 Recycling and Scrap Metal Facility 550 Refrigeration Equipment 275 Reinforced Plastics/Resin Application 330 Repair Garage Includes all required permits; if actual fees are lower, actual fees will apply 2,500 square feet or less 240 2,501-5,000 square feet 330 5,001-15,000 square feet 550 15,001-50,000 square feet 743 More than 50,000 square feet -Actual permit fees Rooftop Heliport 220 Spraying Operations 330 Stationary Storage Battery System 330 Storage of Scrap Tires and Byproducts 220 Tire Rebuilding Plant 1,128 Waste Handling Facility 550 Wood Products 440 Wrecking Yard/Junk Yard 550 • P651 STAFF REPORT RANCHO CUCA\IONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Date: August 5, 2015 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager/ Chief Executive Officer From: Mike Costello, Fire Chief By: Rob Ball, Fire Marshal Subject: A report from Fire and GIS staff on recent joint training opportunities and cooperative community outreach campaigns SUMMARY Fire and GIS staff will provide a report on recently attended ESRI workshops, a presentation made at the ESRI Users' Conference, our incident data analysis map, data for senior living facilities, our recent visit to LA City Fire, and a new GIS based after school program. Respectfully submitted, Mike Costello Fire Chief • ^ P652 STAFF REPORT h CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE RANCHO Date: August 5, 2015 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John Gillison, City Manager From: Fabian Villenas, Principal Management Analyst Subject: Designation of a Voting Delegate and Alternates for the League of California Cities Annual Business Meeting RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council designate one Voting Delegate and up to two Alternates for the Business Meeting of the 2015 League of California Cities Annual Conference. BACKGROUND This year's League of California Cities Annual Conference is scheduled for Wednesday, September 30 through Friday, October 2, 2015, in Los Angeles. The Annual Business Meeting will take place at noon on Friday, October 2nd at the Los Angeles Convention Center. The membership will be taking action on a number of Conference Resolutions, which establish League policy on municipal issues of statewide importance. The League of California Cities (i.e., the "League") requires that each member city designate one (1) Voting Delegate and up to two (2) Alternates, which according to the League bylaws must be designated by an official vote of the City Council. The designated Voting Delegate and Alternates must be registered to attend the Conference and sign in at the Voting Delegate Desk to pick up their voting delegate card. Only one (1) voting card will be provided at sign-in to be used by either. the Voting Delegate OR the Alternates. The task of voting at the Business Meeting cannot be transferred to any other city official beyond the designated Voting Delegate and Alternates. The Voting Delegate and Alternates may be designated at the Council's discretion from Council Members or City Staff scheduled to attend the Conference. Either the Voting Delegate or the Alternates must be present with the Voting Card at the Business Session to vote. CONCLUSION For your consideration, it is offered as a recommendation that the City Council designate one Council Member to serve as the primary Delegate and another Council Member to serve as an Alternate; with an additional Council Member serving as the second Alternate if desired. Respectfully Submitted, O Fabian Villenas Principal Management Analyst Attachment— League Annual Conference Voting Procedures and Submittal Form • P653 L LEAGUE@ 1400 K Street, Suite 400 • Sacramento, California 95814 Phone: 916.658.8200 Fax: 916.658.8240 OF CALIFORNIA www.cacities.org CITIES Council Action Advised by July 31, 2015 May 29, 2015 TO: Mayors, City Managers and City Clerks RE: DESIGNATION OF VOTING DELEGATES AND ALTERNATES League of California Cities Annual Conference—September 30 —October 2, San Jose The League's 20I SAnnual Conference is scheduled for September 30— October 2 in San Jose. An important part of the Annual Conference is the Annual Business Meeting (at the General Assembly), scheduled for noon on Friday, October 2, at the San Jose Convention Center. At this meeting, the League membership considers and takes action on resolutions that establish League policy. In order to vote at the Annual Business Meeting, your city council must designate a voting delegate. Your city may also appoint up to two alternate voting delegates, one of whom may vote in the event that the designated voting delegate is unable to serve in that capacity. Please complete the attached Voting Delegate form and return it to the League's office no later than Friday, September 18, 2015. This will allow us time to establish voting delegate/alternate records prior to the conference. Please note the following procedures that are intended to ensure the integrity of the voting process at the Annual Business Meeting. • Action by Council Required. Consistent with League bylaws, a city's voting delegate and up to two alternates must be designated by the city council. When completing the attached Voting Delegate form, please attach either a copy of the council resolution that reflects the council action taken, or have your city clerk or mayor sign the form affirming that the names provided are those selected by the city council. Please note that designating the voting delegate and alternates must be done by city council action and cannot be accomplished by individual action of the mayor or city manager alone. • Conference Registration Required. The voting delegate and alternates must be registered to attend the conference. They need not register for the entire conference; they may register for Friday only. To register for the conference, please go to our website: www.cacities.org. In order to cast a vote, at least one voter must be present at the -over- P654 Business Meeting and in possession of the voting delegate card. Voting delegates and alternates need to pick up their conference badges before signing in and picking up the voting delegate card at the Voting Delegate Desk. This will enable them to receive the special sticker on their name badges that will admit them into the voting area during the Business Meeting. • Transferring Voting Card to Non-Designated Individuals Not Allowed. The voting delegate card may be transferred freely between the voting delegate and alternates, but only between the voting delegate and alternates. If the voting delegate and alternates find themselves unable to attend the Business Meeting, they may not transfer the voting card to another city official. • Seating Protocol during General Assembly. At the Business Meeting, individuals with the voting card will sit in a separate area. Admission to this area will be limited to those individuals with a special sticker on their name badge identifying them as a voting delegate or alternate. If the voting delegate and alternates wish to sit together, they must sign in at the Voting Delegate Desk and obtain the special sticker on their badges. The Voting Delegate Desk, located in the conference registration area of the San Jose Convention Center, will be open at the following times: Wednesday, September 30, 8:00 a.m. —6:00 p.m.; Thursday, October 1, 7:00 a.m. —4:00 p.m.; and Friday, October 2, 7:30-10:00 a.m. The Voting Delegate Desk will also be open at the Business Meeting on Friday, but will be closed during roll calls and voting. The voting procedures that will be used at the conference are attached to this memo. Please share these procedures and this memo with your council and especially with the individuals that your council designates as your city's voting delegate and alternates. Once again, thank you for completing the voting delegate and alternate form and returning it to the League office by Friday, September 18. If you have questions, please call Kayla Gibson at (916) 658-8247. Attachments: • 2015 Annual Conference Voting Procedures • Voting Delegate/Alternate Form P655 Annual Conference Voting Procedures 2015 Annual Conference 1. One City One Vote. Each member city has a right to cast one vote on matters pertaining to League policy. 2. Designating a City Voting Representative. Prior to the Annual Conference, each city council may designate a voting delegate and up to two alternates; these individuals are identified on the Voting Delegate Form provided to the League Credentials Committee. 3. Registering with the Credentials Committee. The voting delegate, or alternates, may . ._pick up the city's voting card at the Voting Delegate Desk in the conference registration area. Voting delegates and alternates must sign in at the Voting Delegate Desk. Here they will receive a special sticker on their name badge and thus be admitted to the voting area at the Business Meeting. 4. Signing Initiated Resolution Petitions. Only those individuals who are voting delegates (or alternates), and who have picked up their city's voting card by providing a signature to the Credentials Committee at the Voting Delegate Desk, may sign petitions to initiate a resolution. 5. Voting. To cast the city's vote, a city official must have in his or her possession the city's voting card and be registered with the Credentials Committee. The voting card may be transferred freely between the voting delegate and alternates, but may not be transferred to another city official who is neither a voting delegate or alternate. 6. Voting Area at Business Meeting. At the Business Meeting, individuals with a voting card will sit in a designated area. Admission will be limited to those individuals with a special sticker on their name badge identifying them as a voting delegate or alternate. 7. Resolving Disputes. In case of dispute, the Credentials Committee will determine the validity of signatures on petitioned resolutions and the right of a city official to vote at the Business Meeting. LEAGUE P656 OP CALIFORNIA CITY: CITIES 2015 ANNUAL CONFERENCE VOTING DELEGATE/ALTERNATE FORM . Please complete this form and return it to the League office by Friday, September 18, 2015. Forms not sent by this deadline may be submitted to the Voting Delegate Desk located in the Annual Conference Registration Area. Your city council may designate one voting delegate and up to two alternates. In order to vote at the Annual Business Meeting(General Assembly), voting delegates and alternates must be designated by your city council. Please attach the council resolution as proof of designation. As an alternative, the Mayor or City Clerk may sign this form, affirming that the designation reflects the action taken by the council. Please note; Voting delegates and alternates will be seated in a separate area at the Annual Business Meeting. Admission to this designated area will be limited to individuals(voting delegates and alternates) who are identified with a special sticker on their conference badge. This sticker can be obtained only at the Voting Delegate Desk. 1. VOTING DELEGATE Name: Title: 2. VOTING DELEGATE - ALTERNATE 3. VOTING DELEGATE - ALTERNATE Name: Name: Title: Title: PLEASE ATTACH COUNCIL RESOLUTION DESIGNATING VOTING DELEGATE AND ALTERNATES. OR ATTEST: I affirm that the information provided reflects action by the city council to designate the voting delegate and alternate(s). • Name: E-mail Mayor or City Clerk Phone: (circle tine) (signature) Date: Please complete and return by Friday, September 18, 2015 League of California Cities FAX: (916) 658-8240 ATTN: Kayla Gibson E-mail: kgibson @cacities.org 1400 K Street, 4th Floor (916) 658-8247 Sacramento, CA 95814 Bringing Data to Life a collaboration with GIS and Fire Data Tells the Story Strategic Objective of the Fire District Strategic Objectives •Successful Program Implementation •“Provide Premier Emergency and Non-Emergency Services” •Reduce Preventable Emergencies •Improve Quality of Life •Increase Our Value •Desired Achievements: •Data-Driven Decision Making •Analytics Guiding Program Development Comprehensive Risk Analysis Develop capacity to achieve predictive analytics What We Have Learned •Predictive Analytics •Danger of Assumptions •Using actual data increases organizational value by becoming prevention focused. •Design and implement programs based on data-derived trends, community values, and preventive needs. Going Forward… Look for short- term trends and immediate needs Analyze Data Share tool throughout the organization to explore new opportunities for community engagement and partnerships (HealthyRC, Community Services, Public Works, etc.) Junior Firefighter Camp Fire/GIS in Schools Feedback/Community Engagement QUESTIONS?