HomeMy WebLinkAbout85-93 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 85-93
• A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT NO. 12040 LOCATED AT
THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW HIGHWAY AND TURNER AVENUE
IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
WHEREAS, on November 25, 1981, the Planning Commission approved
Tentative Tract 12040; and
WHEREAS, on the 21st day of May, 1985, a complete application was
filed by the Anden Group for review of revised site and elevations; and
WHEREAS, on the 12th day of June, 1985, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning
Commission held a meeting to consider the above-described project.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as
follows:
SECTION 1: That the following can be met:
1. That the proposed project is consistent with the
objectives of the General Plan; and
2. That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of
• the Development Code and the purposes of the district in
which the site is located; and
3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the
applicable provisions of the Development Code; and
4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to
properties or improvements in the vicinity.
SECTION 2: That Design Review for Tract 12040 is approved subject
to the following conditions and attached Standard Conditions:
DESIGN REVIEW:
1. Landscaping pockets shall be provided between garage doors.
2. To create variety and interest, the two outside garages and
the two inside garages shall have different shades of
color, material , and design, and plans shall be submitted
for City Planner approval .
3. Guest parking within the site shall be redesigned at a 900
angle. The guest parking located at the curve of the
• driveway shall be relocated to mitigate potential traffic
hazard.
4. The proposed wood patio fence for the ground floor units
shall be upgraded with additional details and shall be
stained or painted.
Resolution No. 85-93
Tentative Tract 12040
Page # 2
•
5. A sound barrier consisting of a decorative wall/berm
combination with the top of the wall elevation being 6 feet
above the centerline elevation at Arrow Highway shall be
required. The design of this decorative sound barrier
shall be included in the Detailed Landscape Plans and to be
submitted for review and approval by the City Planner prior
to issuance of building permits. Thorn shrubs on vine
shall be provided along this decorative wall to prevent
graffiti .
6. A final acoustical report to provide mitigation measures
for interior noise reduction in complying with Title 25
shall be required, and shall be submitted to Planning
Division for review and approval at the plan check process
prior to issuance of any permits.
7. A block wall with landscaping shall be required along the
northern properly boundary for buffering between this
project and the single family homes.
• 8. A decorative open fence with landscaping shall be required
along the east property boundary for buffering between this
project and the Deer Creek Channel .
9. All pertinent conditions of Approval for TT 12040, as
contained in Resolution 81-139, shall apply.
ENGINEERING DIVISION:
1. Reconstruction of the existing pavement to provide for a
cross-slope shall be required and to the satisfaction of
the City Engineer.
2. The intersection of Arrow Route and Turner Avenue shall be
reconstructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF JUNE, 1985.
PLAN
0 MISSION OF E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
1 •
�I
Dennis rr Chairman
•
it valS
ATTEST: 1
/Ric + Gom•. , Deputy Secretary
Resolution No. 85-93
Tentative Tract 12040
• Page # 3
•
I, Rick Gomez, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 12th day of June, 1985, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: McNIEL, BARKER, CHITIEA, REMPEL, STOUT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
•
41