HomeMy WebLinkAbout86-167 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 86-167
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT NO. 13059 LOCATED NORTH
OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD AND EAST OF THE DEER
CREEK FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL IN THE VICTORIA PLANNED
COMMUNITY
WHEREAS, on the 10th day of September, 1986, a complete application
was filed by Republic Development for review of the above-described project;
and
WHEREAS, on the 12th day of November, 1986, the Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above-described project.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as
follows:
SECTION 1: That the following can be met:
1. That the proposed project is consistent with the
objectives of the General Plan; and
2. That the proposed use is in accord with the
objectives of the Development Code and the Victoria
Community Plan and the purposes of the district in
which the site is located; and
3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of
the applicable provisions of the Development Code;
and the Victoria Community Plan; and
4. That the proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety, or welfare, or materially
injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity; and
5. That the proposed subdivision design is
substantially in conformance with the original
Tentative Tract as approved.
SECTION 2: That Design Review for Tract 13059 is approved subject
to the following conditions:
1. This approval is only for the proposed site plan,
building architecture, and lot line adjustments plan
submitted as part of this application. All
Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract 13059 per
Resolution Nos. 86-54 and 86-107 shall remain
applicable with this approval for Design Review.
Resolution No.86-167
Page 2
2. Detailed site development plans, including, but not
limited to, plot plans, landscape/irrigation plans,
fencing plans, and architectural plans shall be
submitted for the review and approval of the City
Planner prior to issuance of any building permits.
3. On lots with 3-car garages, standard 2-car drive
approaches (W = 16' ) shall be used on lots where a
front building setback of 25 feet can be maintained
while still holding a minimum 20 foot flat rear
yard. Driveways can flare out to a 3-car wide widths
on private property.
4. Front yard setbacks shall be increased to a minimum
of 20' (measured from back of sidewalk), for all
lots, and only be permitted to be lessened to 18' on
lots where it is necessary to accommodate minimum
rear yard requirements (refer to Condition #8).
5. Window upgrade treatments shall be provided on any
side or rear elevation that is exposed to view from
any public right-of-way. Plans detailing the extent
of this upgrade treatment and to what lots they are
to be applied shall be submitted for the review and
approval of the City Planner prior to issuance of
any building permits.
6. Exterior siding material used on the front elevation
shall be extended on the garage side elevation to
the return fencing. Details of this treatment shall
be submitted for the review and approval of the City
Planner prior to the issuance of any building
permits.
7. An acoustical study detailing what mitigation
measures, if any, are required to achieve noise
levels, both exterior and interior, consistent with
City Standards for lots abutting the railroad right-
of-way shall be submitted for review and approval
prior to the issuance of any building permits.
8. Each lot within the project shall have a minimum
flat (2% slope or less) rear yard open area from
building to property line, or slope/retaining wall
of 20 feet. A final detailed site plan which
indicates the slope and retaining wall locations and
unit plotting shall be submitted prior to issuance
of building permits.
Resolution No. 86-167
Page 3
9. Corner side yard fencing for all corner lots shall
be constructed of a decorative block material .
Details of the wall design shall be included on the
submitted landscape/irrigation plans, and shall be
subject to the review and approval of the City
Planner prior to the issuance of building permits.
10. Corner side yard fencing and/or retaining walls
shall be set back a minimum distance of 5 feet from
the back of sidewalks. All retaining walls exposed
to public view shall be constructed of decorative
block, and all wood fencing installed by the
developer shall be treated with water sealant or
stain, where exposed to public view. All fencing
details shall be included within the landscape and
irrigation plans and shall be subject to review and
approval by the City Planner prior to the issuance
of building permits.
11. For all corner lots, the side yard between the
sidewalk and the side yard fencing shall be
landscaped and irrigated by the developer.
12. The front yard setback for Lot 130 shall be
increased to 28' (measured from back of sidewalk) to
assist sight distance around the corner for added
traffic safety.
13. The access easement, shown on the recorded tract map
between Lots 5 and 6, for the purpose of providing
landscape maintenance easement access to the
railroad property slope abutting the tract to the
south, shall be improved per the requirements of the
approved landscape improvement plans for the
railroad slope.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1986.
PLANNING COMM • OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
NV-BY: _. !.a.-.
iavi :afar- rman
i
ATTEST: 4410' A f4%
:ra. :u -r, e—pu y ecre ary
Resolution No. 86-167
- Page 4
I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 12th day of November, 1986, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: STOUT, MCNIEL, BARKER, CHITIEA, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE