HomeMy WebLinkAbout87-47 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 87-47
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING
COMMISSION DENYING VARIANCE NO. 86-08(AMENDED) TO
WAIVE THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT REQUIREMENT FOR AN
EXTENDABLE ANTENNA LOCATED AT 5327 CAROL AVENUE IN
THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
A. RECITALS
(i ) On December 7, 1983, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga adopted Ordinance 211 providing for the regulation of antennas.
(ii) On November 14, 1986, an application was filed and accepted on
the above-described project.
(iii) On April 8, 1987, the Planning Commission held a duly
advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California
Government Code.
B. RESOLUTION
NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as
follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all the
facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution
are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this
Commission during the above referenced April 8, 1987
hearing, including the written Staff Report, and the
written, signed and verified application of the applicant,
this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located at
5327 Carol Avenue on a lot presently improved
with a house, garage and a 30 foot radio
antenna;
b. The property and surrounding properties are in
the Very Low Residential District;
c. The existing radio antenna was erected without
proper permits for the footings prior to
construction.
d. The proposed antenna and support structure would
exceed the maximum permitted height (extended)
within the Very Low Residential District by 22
feet.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
VARIANCE 86-08 - SPETNAGEL
April 8, 1987
Page 2
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this
Commission during the above-referenced April 8, 1987
hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth
in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds
and concludes as follows:
a. That strict or literal interpretation and
enforcement of the specified regulation would
not result in practical difficulty or
unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with
the objectives of the Development Code.
b. That there are no exceptional or extraordinary
circumstances or conditions applicable to the
property involved or to the intended use of the
property that do not apply generally to other
properties in the same district.
c. That strict or literal interpretation and
enforcement of the specified regulation would
not deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed
by the owners of other properties in the same
district.
d. That the granting of the Variance will
constitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations on other
properties classified in the same district.
e. That the granting of the Variance will be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or materially injurious to properties
or improvements in the vicinity.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in
Paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby denies
the application.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 1987.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: I it lib. D e
Ley T. Mc el ,— Chairman
ATTEST: 4.i. Ali►'
Bra. Bu er, Deputy ecretary
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
VARIANCE 86-08 - SPETNAGEL
April 8, 1987
Page 3
I , Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 8th day of April , 1987, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE