Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout88-17D - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 88-170 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 87-26 FOR THE REHABILITATION OF THE EXISTING WINERY AND STILL BUILDINGS FOR OFFICE, RETAIL AND RESTAURANT USES WITHIN THE THOMAS WINERY PLAZA LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND VINEYARD AVENUE IN THE SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 208-101-10 AND 11 A. Recitals . (i ) Sanderson, Ray & Petry/OAS has filed an application for a modification to Conditional Use Permit No. 87-26 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application". (ii ) On the 14th of March, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii ) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1 . This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on March 14, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue with a street frontage of 1 ,845 feet and lot depth of 795 feet and is presently improved with retail buildings; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is single family homes, the property to the south is partly vacant and partly developed with a liquor store, the property to the east is an existing shopping center, and the property to the west is an existing roller rink with restaurant. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 88-17D CUP 87-26 MODIFICATION NO. 1 - SANDERSON, RAY, PETRY/OAS March 14, 1990 Page 2 (c) The proposed rehabilitation of the Winery and Still buildings would further implement the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health , safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan . 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and , further, this Commission has issued a Negative Declaration on January 27, 1988. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 , 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division 1 . All pertinent conditions as contained in Resolution Nos. 88-17, 88-17A, and 88-17B shall apply. 2. The roof material shall be of wood shake. A full sample of the wood shake shall be submitted for Design Review Committee review and approval prior to issuance of building permits for the rehab work. 3 . Any ground mounted equipment such as, but not limited to, a/c units, shall be screened with a combination of decorative walls and landscaping. 4. Certain kitchen equipment, such as a grease hood, may be allowed to extend from the roof. However, it shall be kept to a minimum subject to Design Review Committee review and approval . In addition, the developer shall submit two alternative screening methods using a dormer design or other agricultural style design element for PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 88-170 CUP 87-26 MODIFICATION NO. 1 - SANDERSON, RAY, PETRY/OAS March 14, 1990 Page 3 Design Review Committee review and approval prior to issuance of any permits. The City Planner, on a site inspection, may require the developer to use one of the approved screening methods for screening the roof equipment/projection prior to the release of occupancy for the Winery and/or Still Building . 5 . The proposed drought-tolerant plant palette in front of the original Winery Building (the Adobe portion) is acceptable. If these plant materials are to be extended around the entire Winery Building, then it shall be brought back to Design Review Committee for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 6 . The heavy redwood outdoor furnishings are acceptable as a concept. Detailed design of all hardscape shall be submitted to the Design Review Committee for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 7. Signs . a. A low profile freestanding monument sign identifying the winery as the oldest winery in California is acceptable. The final design shall be subject to Design Review Committee review and approval prior to issuance of any sign permits. b. The size of the wall sign on the west elevation shall be reduced subject to Design Review Committee review and approval prior to issuance of any sign permits. c . The south and north elevations of the Still Building shall maintain the Winery logo sign as originally approved. The lineal signs on the east and west elevations are acceptable. Final design and sign area shall be subject to Design Review Committee review and approval prior to issuance of any sign permits. 8 . The wall mounted equipment, such as gas meters, shall be relocated to the north side and screened subject to City Planner review and approval , prior to issuance of building permits. 9. The light fixtures underneath the roof eaves on the west elevation shall be eliminated. 10. All existing and new doors, windows, etc. , must be sensitive to, and incorporate, the historic patterns, materials, color, and style. Detailed plans of the doors and the windows , etc. , shall be submitted for Design Review Committee review and approval prior to issuance of any permits . PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 88-17D CUP 87-26 MODIFICATION NO. 1 - SANDERSON, RAY, PETRY/OAS March 14 , 1990 Page 4 11 . A detailed exterior lighting plan for the Winery and Still buildings and the parking lot in front of the Winery shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. The detailed lighting plan shall address the adequacy of lighting up the Winery and Still buildings and the parking lot using special techniques of uplighting and downlighting and without using freestanding light fixtures. 12. Approval shall expire unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval . Engineering Division 1 . The gas meters and sprinkler valve on the west side of the building shall not be located within the public right-of- way or sidewalk easement. Relocation of the gas meters shall be approved by the City Planner and the City Engineer. 2. The doors on the west side of the building shall not extend into the public right-of-way or sidewalk easement when opened. Also, the proposed eating area will not be allowed within the public right-of-way or sidewalk area. 3. An encroachment permit for the arbor that extends into the public right-of-way on Vineyard Avenue shall be recorded prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. All outstanding Conditions of Approval for CUP 89-26 (Planning Commission Resolution No. 88-17) for Public improvements shall be completed and accepted by the City prior to issuance of building permits. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF MARCH, 1990. PLANNING COwMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r , Larr McNiel Chairman ATTEST: �s «�e��_i r U ,' er Waretary PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 88-17D CUP 87-26 MODIFICATION NO. 1 - SANDERSON, RAY, PETRY/OAS March 14, 1990 Page 5 I , Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of March, 1990, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY, WEINBERGER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE