Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout88-215 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 88-215 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 88- 14 TO ESTABLISH 15 ADDITIONAL MOBILE HOME SPACES IN AN EXISTING MOBILE HOME PARK LOCATED WEST OF HAVEN AVENUE, SOUTH OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD TRACKS IN THE LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) - APN: 202-201-51 AND 63 A. Recitals. (i ) Adger has filed an application for the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit No. 88-14 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application". (ii ) On the 26th of October, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii ) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on October 26, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located west of Haven Avenue and south of the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks with a street frontage of 550 feet and lot depth of 606 feet and is presently improved as an existing mobile home park; and (b) The property to the north of the subject site is Low Density Residential , the property to the south of that site consists of Low- Medium Density Residential , the property to the east is Medium Density Residential ; and (c) The proposed application has never been completed nor the property owner's authorization obtained; and (d) The environmental document has not been completed as necessary seismic information was never submitted; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 88-215 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88-14 - ADGER October 26, 1988 Page 2 (e) The project as proposed exceeds the maximum density limit of the district in which it is located. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is not in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use does not comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and is not in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby denies without prejudice the application. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �� 4 s /� V./ � , l BY: II� ar_ . ' lap ATTEST: , % P.Alp" ary PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 88-215 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88-14 - ADGER October 26, 1988 Page 3 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of October, 1988, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL,TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE