HomeMy WebLinkAbout88-229 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 88-229
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP NUMBER 11838, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
BASELINE ROAD AND VICTORIA PARK LANE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 227-111-28, 34, 35
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 11838, submitted by Hughes
Investments, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 2 parcels, the
real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San
Bernardino, State of California, identified as APN(s) 227-111-28, 34, 35,
located on the northwest corner of Baseline Road and Victoria Park Lane; and
WHEREAS, on November 9, 1988, the Planning Commission held a duly
advertised public hearing for the above-described map.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made:
1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan.
2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is
consistent with the General Plan.
3. That the site is physically suitable for the
proposed development.
4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will
not cause substantial environmental damage, public
health problems or have adverse affects on abutting
property.
SECTION 2: This Commission finds and certifies that the project has
been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative
Declaration.
SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 11838 is hereby approved
subject to the attached Standard Conditions and the following Special
Conditions:
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 88-229
PM 11838 - HUGHES INVESTMENTS
NOVEMBER 9, 1988
PAGE 2
1. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and
electrical ) along the project's Baseline Road frontage shall be
undergrounded from the first pole on the west side of the future
cul-de-sac street along the project's westerly boundary to the
terminus pole offsite east of Victoria Park Lane, including the
portions crossing and on the south side of Baseline Road prior
to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs
first for any parcel . The Developer may request a reimbursement
agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for
undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it
occurs on the opposite side of the street.
2. Construct 1-inch conduit with pull rope and pull boxes spaced
approximately 200 feet apart on the north side of Baseline Road
along the project's frontage for the future traffic signals
coordination.
3. Baseline Road shall be constructed from Victoria Park Lane to
the project's westerly boundary including the curb returns for
the future cul-de-sac street to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer upon development of any parcel as follows:
a. Full improvements for the north roadbed, except that parkway
improvements along the remainder parcel may be deferred until
development of the remainder parcel ;
b. Median Island, including landscaping;
c. Minimum 26' pavement width for the south roadbed;
d. Transitions to meet the existing roadway;
e. The improvements shall be coordinated, if possible, with the
City Baseline Road project; and
f. The Developer may request a reimbursement agreement to
recover the cost of the improvements south of the centerline
from future development on the south side of the street.
4. The proposed traffic signal and all pertinent equipment for the
intersection of Victoria Park Lane and Baseline Road may require
additional street dedication. Any additional right of way shall
be determined in the plan check process and dedications made
accordingly.
5. The proposed modifications to Victoria Park Lane associated with
the development of CUP 88-35 are subject to approval by the City
Council . Therefore, the final Parcel Map shall not be recorded
until the design for CUP 88-35 has been completed. Also, the
parcel lines shall correspond to the final approved design for
CUP 88-35.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 88-229
PM 11838 - HUGHES INVESTMENTS
NOVEMBER 9, 1988
PAGE 3
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 1988.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: // _ . _ 7Q � _ _
airy . 'c 'r airman
ATTEST: s �a /tea.
I, Br.d Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 9th day of November, 1988, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL,TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
f I — ▪G •o �� .
.. �`
Y°CG ;E� aa.. 0.
Q —.. � — + y L'_r Y fie � • O „, L P C l
a
` Oj rG Gi Oa CHC_ w4p
N NP ri 8 ...”5, V- a
z r
SU N—N $.7.,Y f 2 'e;:A O G P V 1'6
°a i u.
a u w a •r N V� .c
-N r - V
N~ e p
a
_Ng
°e 8 ! X �l •n v Yg� =
_
7. L� • _ G ° -N J ) O V G Ca ' 1. L
Li P r Y N Ca 7 N y Y Y a C p` N V�� �M a p . a Y '` N� ' ▪V 6e_ °p oa• • - LO K2 - r i r �i X '� • a -
L 8' t. e
S S a t• .e g�e '72 Sy ° i O — MW C N V
r 3 PAE g � V p p": 0 ��-
G V V 6 v •CL _VIZ L—W y . YY VyCY •V + LAY .S C v
` JM •: p V ! Vte
2
C 8 a L fLw Ov GL t6 X ..ti tit CLV O 0r i°0 10 a N •= E P S + g 0 ; ax E, 'p s € _ C 01 p X • .i €3 V- w cy _ .. _ y _ €y 8 NC 8 = O ••• E - W g C t; CE 4`\ la
y y�y ` a ' y" C- NjyI ri Y l.x N\~ 8 N= IOU■_� .
a -
i o a _
:I a ail >1 x
>1 I
U
2 a. gSM 2N
1 a .., 8 L `3 Yy' - - e _-
Q -
• 204 0 - ! s Ya
;; ; iW gg"
O a l •
Y L O O . L .s.
2 a Y et •S•
•11 = CL C
3 t
� •G M
_' = = = _
Y w • • L ° $$. =Q - :e —
� • I Y C O 0 .5 i 'y 7..g.
•
C
L
a-
4
•
? a 731 ya v fi€ F r1 .:i 5888 ..i 4t - ::t i� + N x •..i• o • • 2y Y y y • .. ...
.Naa ■ a O , ...—0 pa s _Y Y — t. _ V ly E YN Y j H r y. Q w M Y N, — y . _O _ ?so L H Li.7. O L g N O _ P P
• • Y y - O ■= O + + V Y P . -N v e y- N Y . a • N — O O L y N ti y 3 N y O P GO PP V rC� N ` w .N • i w— O N e
y E VV' a._ v aY NN ^ V— .i
I. • _W Y7 Y • C C` — .e p w CC ili
L. VN 4 + 04. 011. 0 4L ` 14/4.0 ` y° <V w L C p V N - •N G r` -+ IN y
_ & L
2 41 I )(1 >1 51 lI I 1
•
Coy
�� . fl
a. • o a
E 0 S I d U C V y y
. t kE
\ y c �, L... u L v C _o c_ u C G y
O. C � n- y9E ..i 0. PC
! y • V C
C '_ • C
6
-Y 4A
O
y PO lc +
- 1.. N C• E O _
+a
• V U
l r ✓ 0,a. V
laJ 11 9 UOu LL ` O' f CCO p - O V
_ V w O«
D_ O C ^� V D Y V y S T `-¢ U oe I. ' i
I ce C F G - G Y CY M
$$c € i _
°k € Y oCJ
V
N C N E ECC O Y N 5 G O E
9 L E O O_ L E V .... I
° °.... Z
C � e y C. Y2'll
qV aL SEq_ 1 - CC YYM•
•g u11
0 Lu u q!_ .Oi u LL O LY
t. VV � LVE €� „
t d 2 V- y= ! L N O -p O
`aa u 'o' e< o�Y Cspr
wu.L. > VD 4 s
C C— Cr L V . L L -.s rift!
y
GY _ 'V a :
r%+Le L. $Ea it u a a= . %ga4-
•
° in .e r. m
X X X
ry
a • ,.t. L q
•_ 0 . a O V 0 *C pV 212 Y a E a C „= Y u•
14 „ Ly YC ` V� _ V Q a.r q4
N_ v9 Y • PY 'pG pep= -q^ d . L..s.
• L O^ L. g O V r
C = g
3.- I E E • C �.°r ...C. a°, aye Ea
CJ .°•
Ca Val , 43 „ Ey6'1 ip , O „ L q
S «
�� �J qq5 u gse rill „
E ! a \ O N N L N i y V y a. Y O' + C
b.
fifi
Ly ° = la g « ^ e Q . ^c
L
; g fg — X e € o S Q N« stp S
V o Oy yo. C L E L "2 L lu V L« = V y Y
O E !L V , GY p_ O S' M q L V
L_ =8 a „-a „B� � e �_„ �g as
•c °C C „ 8 L. a y V Y c N L C 'Cp a.
Cy — C W , LL V s MC U C V „
G au z u .... a 3 r e g e°a Q ... .L. q•el
:a a '. V o V o e c O =a E.
L =° y`
a
V OL 9y YYY .^u
q
PN r"= �1 e+« `. rL. °no ELL ° 'Xy qu £�
Lc.L l C O p V . 'V Z L C L C Y y GN V V — V
fi L Sod ASS ■ c$ Q .
of g: q « ELL y_ EE _ 4; w „M 9;
LL ' e Y„ u� `1 L � E � ' ��V yL L DEO e _ _ 'sOa = 'C�
7, i-
r >9 ;..-1.11 :: rtl O G j o
I.� ry r.r e N I _ H _
IS + • N o
1E E
u >\ X X I of WI x X