HomeMy WebLinkAbout89-21 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 89-21
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION
DENYING VARIANCE NO. 87-11 TO REDUCE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED
AVERAGE LANDSCAPE SETBACK AND TO ALLOW A SIX FOOT HIGH
BLOCK WALL IN THE REQUIRED SETBACK AREA LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAN BERNARDINO ROAD AND KLUSMAN
AVENUE IN THE UTILITY DISTRICT OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -
APN: 208-152-20, 07, 09, 10, 11, 19.
A. Recitals.
(1 ) Cucamonga County Water District has filed an application for
the issuance of the Variance No. 87-11 as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is
referred to as "the application" .
(ii ) On January 25, 1989, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application
and concluded said hearing on that date.
(iii ) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing on January 25, 1989, including
written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to property located at 9641 San
Bernardino Road with a street frontage of ±220 feet and lot depth of ±182 feet
and is presently improved with water district facilities; and
(b) The property to the north of the subject site is existing
single family residential , the property to the south of that site consists of
existing single family residential , the property to the east is a dairy, and
the property to the west is the existing Cucamonga County Water District
Headquarters building.
(c) That there is sufficient room on the property to locate
the wall at the required setback distance of 35 feet from curb face.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 89.- 2d1
VA 87-11 - Cucamonga County Water District
January 25, 1989
Page 2
(d) That the wall would not conflict with any existing or
proposed improvements on site if constructed at the required setback distance.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) That strict or literal interpretation and
enforcement of the specified regulation would not
result in practical difficulty or unnecessary
physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives
of the Development Code.
(b) That there are not exceptional or extraordinary
circumstances or conditions applicable to the
property involved or to the intended use of the
property that do not apply generally to other
properties in the same district.
(c) That strict or literal interpretation and
enforcement of the specified regulation would not
deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the
owners of other properties in the same district.
(d) That the granting of the Variance will constitute a
grant of special privilege inconsistent with the
limitations on other properties classified in the
same district.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph
1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby denies the application.
5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1989.
PLANNING COOMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: a /_ , t_A hg,....as
a'Thy . 'c M' airman
I /
ATTEST: t��� _ _�Las���
. ', rW
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 89-21
VA 87-11 - Cucamonga County Water District
January 25, 1989
Page 3
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 25th day of January, 1989, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY