HomeMy WebLinkAbout89-67 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 89-67
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA DENYING MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 87-
71, LOCATED AT 10807 JERSEY BOULEVARD IN THE MINIMUM
IMPACT/HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 9) OF THE
INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF - APN: 209-143-07, 08, 09
A. Recitals.
(i) Commercial Carriers has filed an application for the approval
of Minor Development Review No. 87-71 as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review
request is referred to as "the application".
(ii) On the of 26th of April 1989, the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and continued
said meeting to May 10, 1989.
(iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced meeting on April 26, 1989, and continued to May
10, 1989, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby
specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to property located at 10807
Jersey Boulevard with a street frontage of 814 feet and an average lot depth
of 673 feet and is presently improved with an office, warehouse and parking
lot; and
(b) The property to the north of the subject site is multi-
tenant industrial park, the property to the south of that site consists of a
warehouse, the property to the east is vacant, and the property to the west is
a warehouse; and
(c) The application applies to a site that is currently
improved with an office building, warehouse building and parking lot and is
considered a legal non-conforming lot; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 89-67
MDR 87-71 - COMMERCIAL CARRIERS
May 10, 1989
Page 2
(d) Municipal Code Section 17.06.020B authorizes the City
Planner to impose reasonable conditions upon a Minor Development Review permit
approval , including requirements for landscaping, street improvements,
regulation of vehicular ingress, egress and traffic circulation, establishment
of development schedules or time limits for performance or completion; and
(e) Municipal Code Section 17.06.020.A states that the purpose
and intent of the Minor Development Review permit process is to assure that
such limited projects comply with all applicable City Standards and
Ordinances; and
(f) The site plan submitted in conjunction with the
application, does not meet the Industrial Specific Plan standard of a 35-foot
average landscape setback and minimum 25-foot parking setback, as measured
from the ultimate face of curb. Further, the site plan and existing chain
link fence improvements do not meet the Industrial Specific Plan standards for
screening outdoor storage of vehicles within 120 feet of a street frontage
with masonry, concrete or other similar materials ; and
(g) The site currently is improved with four driveways within
820 feet of street frontage. The City's access policy for arterial streets
specifies that driveways on the same side of a street be spaced no less than
300 feet apart. Therefore, only two driveways would be allowed on this
site. Further, driveways should align with driveways on the opposite side of
the street or by off-setting a safe distance to avoid conflicting left-turn
movements. The City's access policy also requires the access be located a
minimum 100 feet from intersections.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced meetings and upon the specific findings of facts
set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) That the proposed project is not consistent with the
objectives of the General Plan; and
(b) That the proposed use is not in accord with the objective
of the Industrial Specific Plan and the purposes of the district in which the
site is located; and
(c) That the proposed use is not in compliance with each of the
applicable provisions of the Development Code; and
(d) That the proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph
1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby denies the application.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 89-67
MDR 87-71 - COMMERCIAL CARRIERS
May 10, 1989
Page 3
5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF MAY 1989.
PLANNING CI MISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: MI AS.
/ 'arry �'�' lie , airman
ATTEST: `iffrarf)
y
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 10th day of May, 1989, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, EMERICK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE