HomeMy WebLinkAbout91-125 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 91-125
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE
NO. 91-07 FOR A REQUEST TO WAIVE THE REQUIREMENT FOR A
MASTER PLAN FOR PERMANENT BUILDINGS IN CONJUNCTION WITH
THE REQUEST TO LOCATE A TEMPORARY MODULAR MULTI-PURPOSE
BUILDING OF 912 SQUARE FEET ON THE SITE OF THE EXISTING
6,000 SQUARE FOOT VICTORY CHAPEL, LOCATED ON .74 ACRES OF
LAND IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT (SUBAREA 7) OF THE
INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AT 11837 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD,
WEST OF ROCHESTER AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF - APN: 229-011-21.
A. Recitals.
(i) Victory Chapel has filed an application for the issuance of a
Variance No. 91-07 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter
in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the
application."
(ii) On the 24th of April 1991, the Planning Commission of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing to determine the
completeness of the application, at which time the Planning Commission
directed the applicant to submit a Variance application to potentially
alleviate the Development Code requirement for a master plan for permanent
buildings.
(iii) On the 28th of August 1991, the Planning Commission of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application
and concluded said hearing on that date.
(iv) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearings on April 24 and August 28, 1991,
including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to property located at 11837
Foothill Boulevard with a street frontage of 173 feet and lot depth of
200 feet and is presently improved with a 6,000 square foot building, parking
areas and landscaping; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-125
VAR 91-07 - VICTORY CHAPEL
August 28, 1991
Page 2
(b) The property to the north of the subject site is vacant,
the property to the south of that site consists of vacant land, the property
to the east is an existing adult business, and the property to the west is
vacant.
(c) The property owner is currently processing a master plan
for an industrial park on the parcel in question and all surrounding parcels,
thereby satisfying the intent of the Development Code of providing a master
plan for future permanent buildings in conjunction with a temporary modular
building.
(d) The applicant is leasing the existing building on-site and
does not have authorization from the property owner to provide a separate
master plan for future buildings on the parcel in question.
(e) The modular building will be upgraded in its appearance
and landscaping buffers provided, consistent with Development Code
requirements for temporary modular buildings.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of
the specified regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary
physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code.
(b) That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances
or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of
the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same
district.
(c) That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of
the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by
the owners of other properties in the same district.
(d) That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a
grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other
properties classified in the same district.
(e) That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental
to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties
or improvements in the vicinity.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 91-125
VAR 91-07 - VICTORY CHAPEL
August 28, 1991
Page 3
5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF AUGUST 1991.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
r
BY: _SA A ILC
arry TT Niel, Chairman
X001111 " / S/
ATTEST: l�,I .y��
:rad 711norr ' slippy
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 28th day of August 1991, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY, VALLETTE
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE