HomeMy WebLinkAbout92-95 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 92-95
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING VARIANCE NO. 92-02
TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED INTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 5
FEET TO 6 INCHES FROM THE PROPERTY LINE FOR A SINGLE
FAMILY HOME IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING
UNITS PER ACRE) , LOCATED AT 10077 IRONWOOD STREET, AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-041-64
A. Recitals.
(i) David R. and Tamalyn R. Silva have filed an application for the
issuance of Variance No. 92-02 as described in the title of this Resolution.
Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as
"the application. "
(ii) On the 22nd day of July 1992, the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application and concluded said hearing on that date.
(iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing on July 22, 1992, including written
and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby
specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to property located at 10077
Ironwood Street with a street frontage of 78 feet and lot depth of 112 feet
and is presently improved with a single family home; and
(b) The properties to the north, south, east, and west of the
subject site are single family homes; and
(c) The applicant has constructed a carport inconsistent with
the approved plans; and
(d) The carport structure is setback only 6 inches from the
property line and the required setback is 5 feet per Section 17.08.060A.d; and
(e) The site is a typical rectangular single family lot.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 92-95
VAR 92-02 - SILVA
July 22, 1992
Page 2
(a) That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of
the specified regulations would not result in practical difficulty or
unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the
Development Code.
(b) That there are not exceptional or extraordinary
circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the
intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties
in the same district.
(c) That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of
the specified regulation would not deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed
by the owners of other properties in the same district.
(d) That the granting of the Variance will constitute a grant
of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties
classified in the same district.
(e) That the granting of the Variance will be detrimental to
the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby denies the application.
5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JULY 1992.
PLANNING C. ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
r A
BY: ardit-e
c
i
Larry 'Niel, Chairman
i'. � ioler
ATTEST:�!!_!/r!!��f[��!.
Brauer, y
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 22nd day of July 1992, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, VALLETTE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE