HomeMy WebLinkAbout93-85 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 93-85
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 93-36 FOR A 2,000 SQUARE FOOT CLEANER/TAILOR
LOCATED IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT (SUBAREA 7) OF
THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-011-10, 19, 21, AND 26
THROUGH 28.
A. Recitals.
(i) Masi Commerce Center Partners has filed an application for the
issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 93-36, as described in the title of
this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use
Permit request is referred to as "the application. "
(ii) On the 22nd day of September 1993, the Planning Commission of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application and concluded said hearing on that date.
(iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing on September 22, 1993, including
written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
(a) The application applies to property located at the
southwest corner of Rochester and Foothill with a street frontage of 1,250
feet along Foothill Boulevard and lot depth of 950 feet along Rochester
Boulevard and is presently vacant; and
(b) The property to the north of the subject site is vacant,
the property to the south of the site consists of the Sports Complex, the
property to the east is the Aggozzotti Winery, and the property to the west is
vacant; and
(c) The property is designated "Industrial Park" by the
Industrial Area Specific Plan; and
(d) The proposed use is conditionally permitted in Subarea 7
and is classified as a "Convenience Sales and Service. "
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 93-85
CUP 93-36 - MASI PARTNERS
September 22, 1993
Page 2
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
(a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan,
the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in
which the site is located.
(b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
(c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable
provisions of the Development Code and the Industrial Area Specific Plan.
4. This Commission hereby finds and determines that the project
identified above in this Resolution is exempt from the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines
promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061(b(3) of the State CEQA
Guidelines.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject
to each and every condition set forth below.
Planning Division
1) Tenant improvement plans shall be submitted to
the Building and Safety and Planning Divisions
as well as the Fire District for review and
approval prior to occupancy.
2) Approval of this request shall not waive
compliance with all sections of the Industrial
Area Specific Plan and all other City
ordinances.
3) If the operation of the facility causes adverse
effects upon adjacent businesses or operations,
including but not limited to noise, the
Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before
the Planning Commission for the consideration
and possible termination of the use.
4) Any signs proposed for the facility shall be
designed in conformance with the Uniform Sign
Program for the complex.
•
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 93-85
CUP 93-36 - MASI PARTNERS
September 22, 1993
Page 3
5) Approval shall expire, unless extended by the
Planning Commission, if the building permits
are not issued or approved use has not
commenced within 24 months from the date of
approval.
6) A copy of this Resolution shall be attached to
any lease for this space.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1993.
PLANNING CO ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: at A.'...
���
arr. McNiel, Chairman
i
ATTEST: Ai _______
Br Iarercretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 22nd day of September 1993, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCHER, VALLETTE
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY