HomeMy WebLinkAbout95-16 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 95-16
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING VARIANCE NO. 95-01, A REQUEST
TO WAIVE THE REQUIRED PARKING FOR A SECOND DWELLING UNIT IN
THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION (LESS THAN 2 DWELLING
UNITS PER ACRE) , LOCATED AT 8455 HILLSIDE ROAD, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1061-701-10.
A. Recitals.
1. Joel A. Mester, has filed an application for the issuance of Variance
No. 95-01 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this
Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application. "
2. On the 12th day of April 1995, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and
concluded said hearing on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have
occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced public hearing on April 12, 1995, including written and oral
staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby
specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located at 8455 Hillside Road
with a street frontage of 103 feet and lot depth of 198 feet and is presently
improved with a single family residence; and
b. The properties to the north, south, east, and west of the subject
site are designated residential uses and are developed with single family homes;
and
c. The applicant is proposing to construct a permanent structure as
a 1,058 square foot second dwelling unit; and
d. The Development Code requires two parking spaces be provided for
the second dwelling unit, within an enclosed garage, in addition to that required
for the main residence; and
e. The existing single family residence does contain a two-car garage;
and
f. The applicant is not proposing any additional garage parking
spaces, contrary to Development Code Sections 17.08.030.E.6 and 17.12.040.A; and
g. The site is similar to other sites within the same zoning
classification; and
h. Previous approvals for second dwelling units have complied with
the parking requirements; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 95-16
VARIANCE 95-01 - Mester
April 12, 1995
Page 2
i. Only temporary removable structures used as second dwelling units
are permitted without a two-car garage per Development Code Section
17.09.030.E.6. (f) .
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during
the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set
forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as
follows:
a. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the
specified regulations would not result in practical difficulty or unnecessary
physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code.
b. That there are not exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or
conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the
property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district.
c. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the
specified regulation would not deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the
owners of other properties in the same district.
d. That the granting of the Variance will constitute a grant of
special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties
classified in the same district.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2,
and 3 above, this Commission hereby denies the application.
5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this
Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF APRIL 1995.
PL• . • c�:i 0 ISSION OF THE/0 Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
N
\�`iss j j
BY: . _. /1I1![I5►��h•
� ' Davi• :arker, Chair an
ATTEST: ' � !„ -
Brtd lter, Wy
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly
introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day
of April 1995, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE