HomeMy WebLinkAbout95-49 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 95-49
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF
INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 95-02, A REQUEST TO
AMEND THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN MAP FOR 14.45 ACRES
OF LAND GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
AND EAST OF SPRUCE AVENUE AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF - APN: 208-352-62 THROUGH 69.
A. Recitals.
1. Wohl/Rancho Partners has filed an application for Industrial Area Specific Plan
Amendment No. 95-02 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,
the subject Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On October 11, 1995, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and issued Resolution No. 95-48,
recommending to the City Council that the associated General Plan Amendment No. 95-02A be
denied.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on October 11, 1995, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to approximately 14.45 acres of land, basically a rectangular
configuration, located south of Foothill Boulevard and east of Spruce Avenue and is presently
vacant. Said property is currently designated as Industrial Area Specific Plan, Industrial Park; and
b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Community Commercial
and is partially developed. The property to the west is designated Industrial Park and a portion is
developed. The property to the east is designated Industrial Park and is vacant. The property to the
south is designated Industrial Park and is vacant; and
c. This amendment does conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and
will not provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and
with related development; and
d. This amendment does not promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use
Element; and
e. This amendment would be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent
properties.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 95-49
ISPA 95-02 - WOHLJRANCHO PARTNERS
October 11, 1995
Page 2
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. That the subject property is not suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed
• district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and
b. That the proposed amendment would have significant impacts on the surrounding
properties; and
c. That the proposed amendment is not in conformance with the General Plan.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this
Commission hereby recommends denial of Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment No. 95-02.
5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1995.
PLANNING C•MMISSIO • E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY: . . Ill Ih aI,L.V�
\i" n •
ATTEST: �_-` /�
Bra.Bra•IllirarSe7071
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 11th day of October 1995, by the following vote-to-wit:
• AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MELCHER, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL