HomeMy WebLinkAbout98-46 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 98-46
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL
OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 98-01 PERTAINING TO THE
LAPSE OF APPROVAL AND EXTENSIONS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
I. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for the Amendment described
in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Code
Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On the June 10, and continued to July 22, 1998, the Planning Commission of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded
said hearing on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on June 10, and July 22, 1998, including written and oral staff reports,
together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located within the City; and
b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2
above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan
and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan
and with related development; and
b. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Development Code;
and
c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 98-46
DCA 98-01 - CITY OF RC
July 22, 1998
Page 2
d. The subject application is consistent with the objectives of the Development
Code; and
e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with The General Plan.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the
Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial
evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment
will have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is
exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061(b)(3).
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby recommends of Development Code Amendment No. 98-01 shown in the
Ordinance attached hereto.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JUNE 1998.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
. ' l
BY: AIIa
E. Da�!'r�'�1i man
ATTEST' date
Brad cu er, Secr- "
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of
the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of July,1998 by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, BETHEL, MACIAS, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
•
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE
AMENDMENT 98-01, AMENDING SECTION 17.02.100 OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING LAPSE OF APPROVALS
AND EXTENSIONS.
A. Recitals.
1. On June 10, and continued to July 22, 1998, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly-noticed public hearing with respect to the above-referenced
Development Code Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No.
98- , recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamogna adopt said
amendment.
2. On , 1998, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted
and concluded a duly-noticed public hearing concerning the subject amendment to the Development
Code.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in
Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that the subject amendment
identified in this Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality
Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section
15061(b)(3) of Chapter 3 of Division 6 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
SECTION 3: Section 17.02.100 hereby is amended to read, in words and figures, as
follows:
A. Lapse of Approvals. Approvals for Development Review, Conditional Use Permits,
Variances, and Minor deviations Exceptions shall lapse and become void nt; s
five years from the approval date, unless a different expiration date is specifically
established as a condition of approval and unless one of the following actions occur:
1. A building permit is issued in accordance with the approved entitlement and
construction is commenced and diligently pursued toward completion; or,
2. A Certificate of Occupancy is issued.
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DCA 98-01 - CITY OF RC
Page 2
C. Extensions. An cxtcnsion may be granted by the City Planner for lapse of approval for
projects dc3cribcd in subsection A of thio scetion. Extcnaiona may be granted in 12
conforming. Also, granting of an extension should not be detrimental to the safety or
Planner finds that there is significant change, the City Planner shall refer the cxtcnsion
to the Planning Commission for consideration.