HomeMy WebLinkAbout98-83 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 98-83
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TIME
EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13527, A RESIDENTIAL
SUBDIVISION OF 252 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 88.48 ACRES OF LAND
IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER
ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND WILSON
AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -
APN: 225-071-68.
A. Recitals.
1. GE Capital Corporation has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map
No. 13527, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject
Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application."
2. On September 28, 1988, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 88-200, thereby
approving, subject to specific conditions and time limits, Tentative Tract Map No. 13527.
3. On September 26, 1990, this Commission adopted its Resolution Nos. 88-200A and
90-120, thereby approving a time extension and specific conditions for Tentative Tract Map
No. 13527.
4. On March 21, 1991, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 88-200B, thereby
approving specific conditions for Tentative Tract Map No. 13527.
5. On July 13, 1998, the applicant filed a request for a 12-month time extension.
6. On October 28, 1998, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that
date.
7. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on October 28, 1998, including written and oral staff reports, together
with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The previously approved Tentative Tract Map is in substantial compliance with
the City's current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes, and policies; and
•
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 98-83
TT 13527 - GE CAPITAL CORP.
October 28, 1998
Page 2
b. The extension of the Tentative Tract Map approval will not cause significant
inconsistencies with the current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes, and
policies; and
c. The extension of the Tentative Tract Map approval is not likely to cause public
health and safety problems; and
d. The extension is within the time limits established by State law and local
ordinance.
3. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration,
together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the
application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project
will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon
the findings as follows:
a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines
promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore
reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has
reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the
application.
b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into
the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole,
the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed
project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which
wildlife depends. Further,based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration,
the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the
public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set
forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above,
this Commission hereby grants a time extension for:
Project Applicant Expiration
Tentative Tract No. 13527 GE Capital Corporation September 28, 1999
Tentative Tract No. 14381 GE Capital Corporation September 28, 1999
Tentative Tract No. 14382 GE Capital Corporation September 28, 1999
5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1998.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 98-83
TT 13527 - GE CAPITAL CORP.
October 28, 1998
Page 3
BY: t e Cal it)/
Larry T. cNiel,Chairman
�
ATTEST d��
Br-WSW
W
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of
the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of October 1998, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE