HomeMy WebLinkAbout98-90 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 98-90
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION
FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 14038, A SUBDIVISION OF 2.4
ACRES OF LAND INTO 4 PARCELS IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL
DISTRICT OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND MAPLE PLACE AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 208-961-11
A. Recitals.
1. Fred Daniel has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map
No. 14038, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject
Tentative Parcel Map request is referred to as "the application."
2. On September 9, 1992, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 92-115, thereby
approving subject to specific conditions and time limits, Tentative Parcel Map No. 14038.
3. On August 3, 1998, the applicant filed a request for a 12-month time extension.
4. On December 9, 1998, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that
date.
5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE it is hereby found determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on December 9, 1998, including written and oral staff reports, together
with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows.
a. The previously approved Tentative Parcel Map is in substantial compliance with
the City's current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes, and policies; and
b. The extension of the Tentative Parcel Map approval will not cause significant
inconsistencies with the current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes, and
policies; and
c. The extension of the Tentative Parcel Map approval is not likely to cause public
health and safety problems; and
d. The extension is within the time limits established by State law and local
ordinance.
3. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration,
together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the
application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project
will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon
the findings as follows:
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 98-90
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 14038 - DANIEL
December 9, 1998
Page 2
a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines
promulgated thereunder, that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore
reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission, and further, this Commission has
reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the
application.
b. That based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into
the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole,
the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed
project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which
wildlife depends. Further,based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration,
the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the
public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set
forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set for in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this
Commission hereby grants a time extension for:
PROJECT APPLICANT EXPIRATION
Tentative Parcel Map 14038 Fred Daniel September 9, 1999
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER 1998.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
�7Q
BY:/at to
arry T. Niel, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad MMllIXecrMr
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of
the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of December 1998, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE