HomeMy WebLinkAbout99-108 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 99-108
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION
FOR PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER
14038, AND MODIFYING STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
THEREOF, FOR A SUBDIVISION OF 2.4 ACRES OF LAND INTO 4
PARCELS IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 8) OF
THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST
CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND MAPLE PLACE, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN 208-961-11
A. Recitals.
1. Maple Place Partners, LLC, filed an application for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map
No. 14038, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject
Tentative Parcel Map request is referred to as "the application."
2. On September 9, 1992, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 92-115, thereby
approving, subject to specific conditions and time limits, Tentative Parcel Map No. 14038.
3. On August 14, 1997, the City Engineer granted a 12-month time extension pursuant to
Municipal Code 16.20.100 and Ordinance 534.
4. On December 9, 1998, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 98-90, thereby
approving, subject to specific conditions and time limits, a 12-month time extension for Tentative
Parcel Map No. 14038.
5. On August 18, 1999, the applicant filed a request for a 12-month time extension.
6. On October 27, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date.
7. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A. of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on October 27, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with
public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The previously approved Tentative Parcel Map is in substantial compliance with the
City's current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes and policies; and
b. The extension of the Tentative Parcel Map approval and removal of the Standard
Conditions of Approval Nos. A.7 and G.4 requiring reciprocal parking agreements and an easement
for a joint use driveway for parcels 1 and 2, will not cause significant inconsistencies with the current
General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes, and policies; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 99-108
PM14038 — MAPLE PLACE PARTNERS, LLC
October 27, 1999
Page 2
c. The extension of the Tentative Parcel Map approval and removal of the Standard
Conditions of Approval Nos. A.7 and G.4 requiring reciprocal parking agreements and an easement
for a joint use driveway for parcels 1 and 2, will not cause public health and safety problems; and
d. The extension is within the time limits established by State Law and local
ordinance.
3. Based upon the facts and information contained in the Proposed Negative Declaration,
together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the
application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will
have a significant effect upon the environmental and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the
findings as follows:
a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the Califomia
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated
thereunder, that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the
independent judgement of the Planning Commission, and further, this Commission has reviewed and
considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application.
b. That based upon the changes and alterations, which have been incorporated into
the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the
Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project
will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife
depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff
reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public
hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in
Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 above, this
Commission hereby grants:
a. A time extension for:
PROJECT APPLICANT EXPIRATION
Tentative Parcel Map 14038 Maple Place Partners, LLC September 9, 2000
b. Approval of a modification of Tentative Parcel Map 14038 to remove Conditions of
Approval No. A.7 and G.4 from Planning Commission Resolution No. 92-115.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1999.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
•
/ r
BY: at,
Larry T: 'c eil, Chairman
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 99-108
PM14038 — MAPLE PLACE PARTNERS, LLC
October 27, 1999
Page 3
ATTEST: e
Brad :, '-crew
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission held on the 27th day of October 1999, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MANNERINO