Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout15-17 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 15-17 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2013-00942, A REQUEST TO REMOVE 45 TREES IN CONNECTION WITH A DESIGN REVIEW (DRC2013-00583) FOR A SITE PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW OF A 13-UNIT DETACHED CONDOMINIUM PROJECT ON 2.17 ACRES IN THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT(4-8 DWELLING UNITS PERACRE) FOR A SITE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 150 FEET NORTH OF MONTE VISTA STREET—APN: 202-131-27, 61 AND 62 A. Recitals. 1. Creative Design Associates has filed an application for the approval of Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00942 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tree Removal Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 11th day of February 2015 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on February 11, 2015, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a property located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District; and b. The 2.17 acre site is comprised of three parcels and slopes gently to the southeast. The site contains 45 trees of various species and the remnants of a stone lined drainage channel. The adjacent mobile home park has an open storm drain which currently surface drains across the site and enters the public storm drain system at the southern boundary of the site; and C. To the north and west is a mobile home park within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District. To the south are single-family residences within the Medium (M) Development District: and, to the east, across Archibald Avenue, is a multi-family project within the Medium (M) Residential District; and d. A Tree Removal Permit has been submitted for the removal of 45 trees related to the design review of a 13-unit detached condominium project(DRC2013-00583).An Arborist Report was completed for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17444 (John Gonzalez; May 17, 2005) which PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-17 DRC2013-00942 CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES FEBRUARY 11, 2015 Page 2 reviewed the condition of each tree on the project site. The report concluded that all but 6 trees were in poor condition and should be removed. The report also stated that the 6 trees that were classified as being in fair to good condition should be considered for preservation if they did not conflict with the proposed onsite improvements. The layout of the project prevents preserving these 6 trees healthy trees; and e. The Development Code requires that new developments plant 40 trees per acre, of which 90-percent must be 15-gallon size trees and 10-percent must be 24-inch box size trees. The proposed Landscape Plan includes 92 new trees, 5 trees in excess of the minimum requirement,of which 43 percent will be 24-inch box size trees. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The removal of the trees is necessary due to the condition of the trees related to disease, danger of collapse, proximity to an existing structure, or interference with utility services. The Arborist Report prepared for the project on May 17, 2005 concluded that all but 6 of the trees are in poor condition and should be removed. The required grading and site layout prevent preserving the 6 healthy trees. b. The removal of the trees is necessary in order to construct improvements which will allow economic enjoyment of the property. The trees conflict with the construction of onsite improvements related to the development of the proposed 13-unit multi-family development. C. The removal of the trees will not negatively impact the neighborhood, the established character of the area and property values. There are a large number of mature trees in the surrounding area. The removal of the onsite trees will have a minimal impact on the surrounding area as the 45 trees slated for removal will be mitigated by the number of trees that will be planted as part of the project. The Development Code requires that new developments plant 40 trees per acre, of which 90-percent must be 15-gallon size trees and 10-percent must be 24-inch box size trees. The Landscape Plan for the project includes 92 new trees, 5 trees in excess of the minimum requirement, of which 43 percent will be 24-inch box size trees. d. The removal of the trees is necessary to construct required improvements within the public street right-of-way or within a flood control or utility right-of-way. There are fourtrees to be removed are within the public right-of-way that will replaced by new street trees. e. The trees cannot be preserved through pruning and proper maintenance or relocation. All but 6 of the trees slated for removal have been determined by the Arborist Report to be in poor condition. The 6 healthy trees conflict with the proposed onsite improvements. f. The trees do not constitute a significant natural resource in the city.All but 6 of the trees are in poor condition. The trees will be replaced as part of the project with a greater number of trees. g. Removal of the trees in not restricted by a Specific Plan, Community Plan, condition of approval, or designation as a Historic Landmark. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-17 DRC2013-00942 CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES FEBRUARY 11, 2015 Page 3 h. Every effort has been made to incorporate the trees into the design of the project and the only appropriate alternative is the removal of the trees. The condition of the trees and the proposed site and grading plans prevent maintaining the trees in their present location or from relocating the trees on site. i. The removal of the trees will not have a negative impact on the health, safety, or viability of surrounding trees, nor will it negatively impact the aesthetics or general welfare of the surrounding area. Only 6 of the 45 trees slated for removal have been determined to be healthy.Any negative impact created by the removal of the 6 healthy trees will be mitigated by the 92 new trees that will be planted as part of the project. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included forthe environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on October 10, 2007 in connection with the City's approval of SUBTT17444. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii)substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or(iv)additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with the Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00942, that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. The general layout and number of units have not changed from the original environmental determination. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant, as the project layout and design have not changed since the original environmental determination. C. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of the current application. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-17 DRC2013-00942 CREATIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATES FEBRUARY 11, 2015 Page 4 Planning Department 1) Approval is for the removal of 45 trees related to the development of a 13 unit detached condominium project located on the west side of Archibald Avenue and 150 feet north of Monte Vista Street - APN: 202-131-27, 61 and 62. 2) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: rovV Candyc urnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of February 2015, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE Conditions of Approval j�wctio GUCAMONCA Community Development Departrnent Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910.ARCHIBALD AVE -020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Planning Department 1. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 2. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 3. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department(RCFD) Standards. 4. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CCBRs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Services Department and the.City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 5. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 6. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations, the Specific Plan, Master Plan and the Community Plan / 7. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 8. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. Printed:1/21/2015 N .CltyofRC.us Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE -020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Planning Department 9. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 10. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. 11. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 12. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 13. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be .kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 14. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits .for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 15. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 16. A minimum of trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within the project: percent - 48-inch box or larger percent - 36-inch box or larger, percent-24- inch box or larger, percent- 15-gallon, and percent-5 gallon. 17. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 18. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 9 Printed:1121/20159 Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE -020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department 19. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 20. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. or Approval Letter, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 21. Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program - The owner shall cause the manager and any resident manager to complete the training for and enroll the project in the San Bernardino County Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program. 22. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,260.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 23. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has, not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 24. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk. 25. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 26. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 27. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 28. The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards. Certification shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department and the Planning Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes. w .CityofRC.us Printed:1/21/2015 Page 3 of 9 Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, ORC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE -020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Planning Department 29. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. The final report .shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. 30. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $729 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 31. In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e. beyond final certificate of occupancy), the applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the Planning Director prior to issuance of Building Permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. B. Engineering Services Department 1. Install traffic signal at intersection of Archibald Avenue and Victoria Street/project entry. a. Provide easements as needed for traffic signal equipment and maintenance on private drive aisle. b. Upon completion of the joint use driveway and the traffic signal installation, the existing driveway to the mobile home park shall be closed and reconstructed with curb, gutter, sidewalk and street trees to the satisfaction of the mobile home park and the City Engineer. c. The developer shall receive credit against and reimbursement of costs in excess of the Transportation Development Fee in conformance with City Policy. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 2. Provide two (2) 9500 Lumens LED street lights. 3. Verify existing access ramps on Archibald Avenue and Monte Vista for conformance to ADA requirements and to City Std. 102. Otherwise reconstruct access ramps to current City Std. 100-B and 102 and have a surface applied truncated dome detectable warning surface as supplied by ADA Solutions, Inc. or approved equal. www.CityofRC.us Pooled:1/21/2015 Page 4 of 9 Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE -020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. B. Engineering Services Department 4. Provide a final drainage report to determine: a. Storm water Flows for the fully developed tributary area north of the Archibald/Monte Vista intersection, for both the 25-year and 100-year storm events, with nodes at the proposed inlet facility and all catch basins. b. Include a preliminary water surface profile gradient analysis of the proposed pipe to determine if the drop in the existing pipe under Monte Vista Avenue has a negative impact on the hydraulic grade line of the proposed storm drain pipe. c. Determine the extent of ponding as a result of relocating the pipe inlet headwall and propose alternatives to direct overflows to Archibald Avenue without impacting adjacent properties. d. Confirm that 0100 will remain within the street on Archibald (top of curb). 5. Provide confirmation from Cucamonga Valley Water District that a 1-foot separation between the bottom of a sewer line and the top of a storm drain is acceptable, 6. The following impact fees shall be paid upon issuance of building permit (fees subject to change annually with a scheduled increase May 1, 2015): a. Transportation Fee $ 9,002.00 b. General Drainage Fee $ 19,382.00/per net acre c. Beautification Fee $ 0.20/ SF d. Park Fees $4,396.00 e. Library Impact Fee $ 576.98 f. Animal Center Impact Fee $ 124.29 g. Police Impact Fee $ 172.00 7. Gated entrance shall be in accordance with the City's "Residential Project .Gated Entrance Design Guide" standard. 8. Private storm drains connecting to the public storm drain will need to be shown on the public improvement plans, but they shall be labeled "private" and their sizing will be reviewed by the Building and Safety Division in plan check. 9. All pertinent conditions of approval of Planning Commission Resolution No. 07-59 approving Tentative Tract Map 17444 shall apply. 10. Structures within the vicinity of the City's storm drain shall provide deepened footings so as to avoid a surcharge on the storm drain. E. Grading Section Printed:1/21/2015 w .CityofRC.us Page 5 of 9 Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. E. Grading Section 1. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices (including but not limited to the infiltration trenches) to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the structural storm water treatment devices are the responsibility of the land owner. 2. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, on the permitted set of grading and drainage plans the engineer of record shall provide a definition (including an inset exhibit if necessary) defining the term "Distributed Area". 3. Prior to issuance of a grading permit should a conflict occur between the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan Site and Drainage Plan and the final Project Landscaping Plans, the project improvements shown on the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan Site and Drainage Plan shall govern. 4. Prior to issuance of a grading permit a copy of the final project landscaping plan(s) shall be submitted as a reference set of plans with the permitted set of precise grading plans for review and shall be included in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan. 5. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 6. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 7. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 8. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 10. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 11. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. www.CityofRC.us PnnteC:1/27/2015 Page 6 of 9 Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE -020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: E. Grading Section 12. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC .3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 13. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 14. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 15. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 16. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 17. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 18. Private streets for multifamily developments will include. street plans as part of the Grading and Drainage Plan set. Plan view to show typical street sections. Profile view to show centerline and top of curb profiles. 19. The maximum parking stall gradient is 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 20. Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 21. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 22. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 23. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 24. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit". Punted:1/21/2015 w .CityofRC,uS Page 7 of 9 Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, ORC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE-020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. E. Gradina Section 25. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to .request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 26. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. 27. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 28. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan, 29. Prior to issuance of a grading permit on the final grading and drainage plan the applicant shall clearly show an emergency overflow drainage path should the proposed storm drain pipe become clogged/plugged with debris. The emergency overflow path shall not Flood any residential structures. 30. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable'. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 31. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 32. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number(WDID). 33. A Grading Bond will be required to be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department Official for review and approval prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. www.QtyofRC.us Panted:1/21/2015 Page 8 o/9 Project#: DRC2013-00583 DRC2013-00941, DRC2013-00942, DRC2014-00358 Project Name: Creative Design Associates Location: 6910 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020213161-0000 Project Type: Design Review Minor Exception, Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: E. Grading Section 34. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices, as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance a grading permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 35. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off-site property (i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). 36. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent 37. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 38. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Erosion Control Plan shall show a City required dust control sign within 50-feet of the project construction entrance and a second dust control sign shall be placed within 50-feet of the Chapparal Heights Mobile Home Park entrance. 39. All underground vaults within the proposed construction area on the Chapparal Heights Mobil Home Park which are not traffic rated shall be shown on the permitted set of grading and drainage plans to be replaced with traffic rated vaults prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 40. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the engineer of record shall submit with the private domestic water and sewer plans, calculations showing the proposed sewer line placed near and under the proposed storm water quality infiltration trenches will withstand any buoyance issues created from the proximity to the said infiltration trenches. 41. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Erosion Control Plan shall show the project construction entrance fronting directly on a public street. Construction access from the Chapparal Heights Mobile Home Park shall not be permitted. 42. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit that applicant shall make a good faith effort in writing, and show on the permitte grading and drainge plan, work to be completed on the Chapparal Heights Mobile Home Park including, but not limited to, refinishing the drainage inlet on the Chapparal Heights Mobile Home Park property along with any other construction requirements as shown on the approved conceptual grading and drainage plan dated June 03, 2014. www.CityofRC.us Printed:112112015 Page 9 of 9