The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About13/09/11 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ,ILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA SEPTEMBER 11 , 2013 - 6:00 PM RANCHO UCAMONG Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California L CALL TO ORDER Roll Call 6:04 PM Rich Fletcher A Ray Wimberly X Janet Ryerson X Candyce Burnett X Bill Pallotto A Carol Douglass (Equestrian) X Tom Tisler (Bicycle) X Lou Munoz (Alternate) X Kelly Matheny (Alternate) A IL NEW BUSINESS A. Presentation of the Community Recreation Needs Assessment Francie Palmer, Community Services Marketing Manager gave a PowerPoint presentation. B. Presentation and Discussion Regarding Rest Stops Along the Pacific Electric Trail Donna Finch, Management Analyst I and Walt Stickney, Associate Engineer shared locations of existing and proposed rest stops along the trail. The Committee discussed and considered the following points: Each rest stop would cost approximately$4,000-$5,000 consisting of the following approximate costs:. Public works will pour 17X8'slabs, a total of 5 slabs for$8,250. The installation of metal benches(not concrete) for$1,550 per bench and trash containers for$1,100 + $600 shipping was another noted cost. Commissioner Munoz asked for a time frame for the completion of the improvements. Mr. Stickney said quotes will have to be obtained from the vendors and they will be asked to fix their quotes for a 2-year window. Carol Douglass noted that horse waterers/tie ups are not noted on the plan and they should be 1 of 2 TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA RANCHO GUCAMONGA SEPTEMBER 11, 2013 added to the map and additional costs. Mr. Stickney noted that bike racks are not needed and therefore should b 9 removed from the standard provisions. Vicky Jones mentioned a need for pet stations. Mr. Stickney said they could be added on a case by case basis and would n t be at all the stops. III. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the committee. Items to bed ussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda. IV. ADJOURNMENT 7:36 PM 2 of 2 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA SEPTEMBER 11 , 2013 - 6:00 PM RANCHO UCAMONG Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Rich Fletcher_ Ray Wimberly_ Janet Ryerson_ Candyce Burnett_ Bill Pallotto _ Carol Douglass (Equestrian)_ Tom Tisler (Bicycle) Lou Munoz (Alternate) _ Kelly Matheny (Alternate) II. NEW BUSINESS A. Presentation of the Community Recreation Needs Assessment B. Presentation and Discussion Regarding Rest Stops Along the Pacific Electric Trail III. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the committee. Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda. IV. ADJOURNMENT 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretaryof the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on September 5, 2013, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. 1of1 n"?1 2013 Community Recreation Needs Assessment Findings and Analysis Presented by the Park and Recreation Commission Subcommittee& Community Services Department Conducted by. GreenPlay LLC q. NEEDS ASSESSMENT PURPOSE •To conduct a Statistically Valid Survey that provides a ally reliable method to gain an understanding of a community's recreation needs, attitudes, opinions and behaviors. •A formal Assessment provides one opportunity for data collection in the first phase of the development of a Park and Recreation Master Plan. It serves as one foundation for long range planning initiatives, visioning out 10-15 years. -The last time a Recreation Needs Assessment was conducted in Rancho Cucamonga was in 2000/2001. POPULATION & PROGRESS 2001 2010 -Po ulation 121 100 population over 165 000 • 29.4% population growth -Enhanced program offerings and services for youth, adults and seniors -Completed several capital projects related to priorities identified in 2001 — First phase of Central Park (including new Senior and Community Centers) — Victoria Gardens Cultural Center — Development of additional neighborhood parks. -Elimination of Redevelopment Agency wommommom; A, Rancho Cucamonga 2001 2012 Population 121,100(as stated in 2001 report from Census 167,903 data) Developed 296—not including =/-246 acres of 420 acres of Park community&regional trails parks &open space Acres Parks 19 Neighborhood Parks 31 1.s—10 acres 3 Community Parks 12—44 acres 150 miles of hiking, biking and equestrian trails RECREATION CUSTOMERS • � a nf registration revenue • 63.74% Repeat Rate (benchmark= 30-50%) Generational Break Down • 37.83% of paid registration customers 11 and younger • 10.0% Seniors • 13.5% Baby Boomers Based on analysis by Learning Resources Network(LERN)of 2012 Registration data PROJECT BACKGROUND & TIMELINE •A Community Recreation Needs Assessment was identified as a City Council Goal for the 2012/2013 Fiscal Year as the first step in developing a Park & Recreation Master Plan. -July, 2012 an internal multi-department project team was formed, which included a subcommittee of two Park and Recreation Commissioners. z 'A� Y F !GOITIMMULTI-DEPARTMENT TEAM • Public Works Services • City Manager's Office • Library Services • Animal Services • Purchasing/Administrative Services PROJECT TIMELINE Janua — Februa Stakeholder and Communi Workshops 2013 March — April 2013 Public outreach 100 phone surveys completed 462 hard copy Web based public input via RCCommunityldeas.com May 2013 Data analysis and draft report July 22, 2013 City Council & Park and Recreation Special Meeting August— November Park and Recreation Commission to finalize report F \ x Rancho Cucamonga, CA Community Needs Assessment Needs Assessment Presentation 7/22/13 RRC ASSOCIATES jjnncrlo �� ;IIL.AFIOYfiA Ou unlly .,an:,r:, tie vile. Today's Agenda ■ Demographics ■ Inventory ..Y�� ■ Public Input Process 0 ■ Survey Result Highlights Demographic Analysis Population IVO, -- 1 PO W\OO 1do,)oa 1:0,)00 100,x00 II --- a0,)00 I-- — 60,100 fI 00,)00 x0,)00 0 2000 2010 20_2 2011 __. — US Census(2000 and 2010)and ESRI Projections 2000 Population 127,777 2010 Population 165,269 2012 Estimated 167,903 2017 Projected 175,256 Demographic Analysis • The median age in Rancho Cucamonga in 2012 was 34.6 compared to 32.2 in 2000. • The median income for Rancho Cucamonga was $61,022 in 2o0o, and according to ESRI estimates, it was $76350 in 2012. • The highest ranking educational cohorts in Rancho Cucamonga are those with some college education and no degree (28.9 percent) and high school graduates (21.6 percent) Census Age Demographic Analysis 16.0% 14.0% 12.0% 10.9% 8.0% ■Rancho Cucamonga 5.0% ■CAtfo rnia 4.0% O United States 2.0% 0.0% 0-4 5- 9 10- 15- 20- 25- 35- 45- 55- 65- 75- 85+ 14 19 24 34 44 54 64 74 84 Inventory Analysis (quantitative) Availability to the Residents of Rancho Cucamonga 2000 vs. 202 Inven Po ukWn rco nen t 2000 vs.2012 Ft ho Cu CA 5 � s ^'A xw a u u u 3 e 3 u x u u ♦ ♦ u x lqs nn ee C. 1516 I.M 121111 ))) 12-771 13,M 12 77M9725 1 21,2% 31 )) ra ae µ a a a 3 3 3 w ] u a u ♦ Sa 1 MIIYIIONma7.--w-wZ 16)w3 116v�� SI♦0% ♦lal{ 49]% 336n3 ♦1.M 33.36{ OIIOIf SCO<Olf 0(OI{ OWM Otll{ lO Wlf )I NY µ.6]A 00]li OIOY 6W.COIt WP ee Ii ♦) 1 3 ] ) 1 ]6) 6)16 1 ] 3 roIltl{ 21,11{1 D1 A I 6.9)M 3.SN 3 t0{ ILO.Wi 31♦Oi .31 WY 11 WF 9.383 O.Sl1{ 1.16M .)l W3 -31 WIf il. dx .0 o s 0 E 8 g0 s g ! � s Told 203 29 19 18 POPULATION 2000 127,777 Po ulation er each Comeonent 629 4.406 6,725 7.099 Tot41 300 49 29 28 POPULATION 2010167,903 %Increase 31.40% 47.78% 66.97% 52.63% 55.56% Population per each component 560 3,427 5,790 5997 Percent Change Per Population per each component From 2000 to 2012 11.08% 22.23% 13.91% 15.53% Ung School Field Additions y (2000 to 2012( Y s 8 Elementary Schools 4 Y 12—practice soccer fields 3—overlay soccer fields S 9—practice baseball/softball fields [P7OP=t"T7I0N otal 10 2 10 19 Middle Schools 5—practice soccer fields 2000 127777 1—overlay soccer field reach com onent 12778 63 12,778 6725 1—practice overlay football Total 10 2 1x u field 2—practice softball fields POPULATION 2010 167,903 High Schools %Increase 31.40% 000% 0.00% 20.00% 31.58% 5—practice softball fields Po pi l atlon per each component 16,790 83 952 13 992 6 716 2—game football fields Percent Change Per Population per 2—overla football fields each component From 2000 to 2012 -31.40% -31.40% -9.50% 0.13% Y v i T o 3 c a ?L of o75 n Total 16 4 26 1 POPULA7ION 2000 127,777 Population Der each component I T 21.296 1 31.944 1 4.563 1 127.777 Totai 1 10 4 26 7 POPULATION 2010 167,903 %Inarea9 31.40% 66.67% 0.00% 0.00% 600.00% Po ulation per each component 16 790 41 976 5 997 23i986 Percent Change Per Population per each component From 2000 to 2012 21.16% -31.40% -31.40% 81.23% Focus Groups/Public Meetings • 93 participants attended focus groups and public meetings representing interests from - Friends of the Pacific Electric Trail - Rancho Cucamonga Community&Arts Foundation - Rancho Cucamonga Library Foundation - Senior Advisory Group - Sports Advisory Group - Trails & Equestrian Interests MindMixer jonline Community Engagement Tool) _ Thee�n�/e Ae[Wa P•rticlpentt in Mr•Propct PROJECT TOTALS 41A1055 visitors it 227 Ideas 0 449 Comments Statistically-Valid Community Survey • 462 completed (340 via mail, 122 online) - 9.2% return (average is 5-15%) • ioo completed telephone surveys • 300 completed surveys = a valid sampling 4� Y confidence level (t4.3%) • 56z completed surveys �a 95 • The survey results were statistically weighted to reflect the demographic profile (age, income, - household status) so the results represent the make- up of Rancho Cucamonga. Respondents Household Characteristics Single, no children 21%i i � I Single, with children at home 8% Single,children no longer at home About 12%of (empty nester) 4`�' respondents indicated a need for ADA accessible Couple, no children 11% facilities. Couple,with children at home 33% Couple,children no longer at home (empty nester) 25% � y Respondents Household Characteristics Am of Iger* 18-24 12% ! 25 - 34 21% i 35 -44 22%, I Ate of Respondent 45-54 lb% � Average Median 55 - 64 15 44.8 Years 43.0 Years � I 65- 74 : y% I 75 or older 6% Respondents Household Characteristics 1 HOIq�ICII�IrIG� Under$25,000 1 7% { I I I i $25,000-$49,999 1 win" i $50,000 $74,999 2011 1 I $75,000-$99,999 149% $100,000-$149,999 2 211 � I I $150,000- $199,999 $200,000 or more S ! a..M.,,M..M fm,�.,fw+d WMnf.� ��• Q - tMM til.w4�M .stir tmmtwuip.#Mu�.�M �1.Y ' a Y.! �Trnna�/ysJ��um aY I,u fM T.nasw.M,r'I�i�,�,Iti ' fT•.uMaT.,.4i..w IwF�,w 4Nusy„ei,y.n.tr. _In ,nr.✓�eM.MJr�I/1.1 �N tT....�....,la....'� !'^ "Even though my family does not use everything that Is provided,I appreciate all the options available" Page 7 � � � :�•-,.� � a .. Mrnr.e r rw.w�e M r.inrr i•••w ar.d �wvwa �u rM.b.�r«.ibw+w�r.•I. �rr n..u.snw,o nie -it whtww.uW�n u..wuwr �•. rllrwn.wlRw,rwm-r.."r.•rr ' CMwr•wro•^VNralr y"1 �ls .•p,:�, 46 1Y+M(ww*Y r+•M'svwra[mlw �It `tir' Oryr•ar•wFn p,pwnyayawbi <Mwm.anvpsv�yura.pd �3 [Mnwwny+wv"r.alr ynr �ir rM n.••Iww.o+.w�.a a.., �iu I.w•wr c.,wr v�.a......e•."•m...,...".t"wwr"ra"..a• IMr•t•5+uv CMr+i•IMw+e.a.,... •. r.r•,.n X41 rFar•,r«.aa,wc•raa.. �,. rarr•IwWw,+RrN ..i y"r w.mbralw.lwe n".b �} rM�•rm,pnpgmN<Y,ramwM1 -l} � r.1w•wmnin•V•Iww.ran jjjjjjjjjjm�.1 �Mwwu•"n qxy"•n•a.wva s. xwr"4"w^wW f••W ka.•(nnw ..1 rM�mnimurapmWM•wbr �rn •Iw rh m."wiwM,wJ<Ww.a" �, [.yyah O.WwnWlww ii;nl �.0 [%yim(rrur �39 nnmmarnm}wr•;n >, "6enerally I like the"Level of Sewke"provided." jI aM -n IEEE] Current Programa and Facilities-Importance Naad&,Met Marta- Random Sample overall Facilities "s Rrarar♦wraer _ "ba' —JiNgHigh importance and meeting te.wlaratelenrbM.rF the household needs of the City: n ftry FWb -City parks Y I rlr r..a. -City trails F amsae svoPF F.w. 3 5pitle� Wxaw c.,./„k„e,co -City libraries WOpW OF R plUaraRCE -Animal Care Center RATWW scoaFs(3_51 �" NM� -Lewis Family Playhouse h o\IN WpFI -Special use facilities r.or r Naas -City athletic fields fprrWrls Fr< E �► �� o � 0 . , Loewr..rre.r wrgar HMO x Rlpew wFraWr ryrt 3 s Hew vest meds w claFerrtF/MYrg nFes (eesn'reNng) W'� Page12 a.eorxvmF rRlrcle x•xol IW.e q H• xonrarevvn.nnv -.. M. I n.rlm.r^ x,.w wxl.e.x.wn. yu "oNxvl xa vvrvd vr"omNxYlx oXx.J �l6Y ""'°"'"""'""'"'• �'" 0 - Couples/Single parents L'•'••^ S'e with children tended to indicate » --'••r this more often. IrYdlxd•in xd x�wrnw iiiiiiiiiiiiitpr HW rm,rwrrr iiiiiiiiiiiif~ IxF dv Fyerrxm _ea wuvdacxwnr S. *- Indicates high level of a...r.x...r... 111^_r !a* satisfaction for condition of MA facilities PVIx N+„mm6m PrWIv -aW ItldpvrYrq �� Y.waliry ,Wn 4yLLtn^r14WrM �Fa a,.r.�r.x.Wx�v nve°a�Traxro. .o m Page tj (,"rxrrx rx.:.i.vxs^od.ew S� j Importance of INDOOR Facilities to be Added, Expanded,or Improved (Average Rating) Indoor children's discovery center/interactive museum(2nd Floor of... _ 3.8 Indoor swimming pool for recreational purposes(learn to swim programs,water....I� 3.7 Additional library space 3.7 Additional community use spaces(youth, teen,adult,and/or senior) T � 3.4 Additional weight room and cardio fitness 1 3.3 space Additional multi-purpose gymnasium space 3.2 Additional fitness class space 3.2 { Other 3.5 Page t5 1.0 15 2.0 25 3.0 3.s to 4.5 5.0 Other Indoor Facilities • Additional Senior Center space • More adult armchairs at Archibald Library • Recreation Center • Soccer Complex w/ synthetic turf • Fitness classes to fight childhood obesity I�n/e.brru M W r00D11 f.'ttM.M Al1J.Eq�tln6>impwM (A—,.lYtFV cm4weumn..w. �l•� �.. 0 ✓aewwn....pn 19 .rirmROw�Trnnwbuw�n�9. 19 �Mi�•wm�+.m lwr�n.epa�yrM�..Ix.m �J �omm•�fire.,nrwe.n Tviu. �16 ..9air,a.ww..ow.,vrria�.ler,..,e.9. �1s x•.,.m.a lief l.l�WOv�r.r...n..w.... �� ns , n www.r ux..oai..ivr.ai A��+s Inw+..ry9Mli.rl V.rdeinbo e,e�n r� 1. w.Wnarn �li 9.e.wx�rd.r.nl+a� � IJ ow•„«x..«..w..,.o-n.�n..b.•wi � nx m .o Other Outdoor Facilities • More parks in Southwest RC — Need more than one • Soccer fields • Aquatics park • Central Park handicapped parking Most Important Tadllty/Park Optlws to be Oawloped complete remr.l P.a to* rt% Specific trail linkages within r..a and Wall apme[llvT/ _itx nx Rancho Cucamonga,frequently mentioned: r«won m:n`"r."'WIWL"`n°"` I 27% -Etiwanda Preserve uanm'e azowrycmeerlmLe.en6a moseom �� tat _ In -More North/South Trails eeoo„e:mmey poolly rrcre.ear.I peporK ® ax _ ,ox :I -More neighborhood imprw'e evatin5 pa4s/<ommuniry ceralWr/[ity lxiRies �.. 9x..__ ipx connections Oddow sMmmiry Pad for,Wre.owd wwre. •� WS 151Y -Victoria Gardens connections rode-won.nen rnnole. INK—.M ;. I i ' -Connections to Pacific Electric xnpoLf .W'Eaa.wc~ L Trail amnaMan L ZM 0.{ Sx Wi Lfl{ l0{ 3A 3plf lSY tllf Kx yenMaatlll�.� •MosUn�p rtanr Swcmtl Mostlmponam (C 60red)Tq Tw rn[wly.L.v.l M Xow WMI nap.m M1..1.M Mry W Svr.wV�'M )T a�xvnvp.trrT.rm vy.n )1n sv.r qr�.Y �E9y a,�,.r,�hewW.w�n.m.alr xY '�bar4lrlra �+Iy r n.rarN.etiareAer• -il\ r.iyrpywa �f1M ran aeMYra �lOV '�`� � 4s.. 'narrti.kMn ur.blenl�anMt S.F eeetF,.pirNR.el van.ua'i�e �45\ r ii ilnw I.Yt NnM.n Vrgr.nv.�Y.Ilbr.ti Swtl.l[.wbb M Wrl.(y�YM,u Irryrs�J O�xul ix..v. Healthy RC __. ROMMELME — - s- ON " Through the dedicated -- - - R. MER efforts of city staff, 0MW " M'" community partners and 411111L.W'. volunteers, Healthy RC is developing a wide range of w programs, policies, _<�. v_■.. infrastructure and events to help build and maintain • v" healthy minds, health bodies and a clean and sustainable earth. PageiB :�..:..: eavwwr•+ Smerx mw.M •m,a uw mwnw R�+O*"iti' Impact on Loss of RDA Funding • For Rancho Cucamonga the elimination of redevelopment equates to an annual loss of approximately $90 million in funding. • RDA is currently the source of funding for the Lease for the RC Family Sports Center • The current Lease agreement, which has an annual cost of approximately $360,000, expires in 2017. • Prior to the expiration of the Lease the City will need to consider how to provide recreation programming that is currently being provided at the RC Family Sports Center. Bar and Crrnc BdBWBds d RBrlvhq Conwnrdtwft The Grape+ine/Rambo _�� T '_ Report CityE mall JUVs —1 14% Cityr RarttYro Co.P � im postwslllyers OrM1er �� Rertormanu w prwldlry ',' Cwnmunlcatbn Mw L7 ll% YB VnM 1pCr rrlvllpapll �� 19% � x; ��. B . Su4lrses+vYiry lis iwlnw, 3% g �'". ._. FxebaoF) �9f6 E Is% }pk- Attherecreation Iw larilttws/pmEram button66�wv21% }: �,� RC(ahk W channr(KTV) I I% e% .. 1 . Il% r J.! ♦ A h lexis Family Plryh 5e. plp r' a Bmchuu wmm� ITY 0 ~. OWRaMwn samW RBRal Wi ,dc 14 r . Yt IBR lOf UR apn 50\ OOIF ]Va N m 1. PGgt j2 ---- r.�er RnBahelY Mean Mrlyd v, v A4drd t RRC ASSOCIATES [CAnalo �� CLCAl10YGA Community nu STII Campe�y Scrvr«e Next Steps -- • Meeting with they Stakeholder Grouper - - - - - - -- • Identify 4-5 Areas of Focus • January/February 2014 Final Report to City Council Thank You For Your Time Questions ? �A Draft Report Available @ www.RCpark.com Community Services Department (909) 477-2760 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Household Characteristics (Part 1) Household Status Single, no children 21% Single, with children at home 8% Single, children no longer at home (empty nester) �4% Couple, no children 11% Couple, with children at home 33% Couple, children no longer at home (empty nester) 25% Household Income Under$25,000 17% $25,000- $49,999 16% $50,000- $74,999r7% 0% $75,000-$99,999 $100,000-$149,99922% $150,000- $199,999$200,000 or more In Need of ADA Accessible Facilities Yes 12% 1 No 11 7% Don't know 1% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Percent Responding ■Total Random Sample RRC Associates 1 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Household Characteristics (Part 2) Number of People in Household Average 2.9 Median 2.0 Number of Household Members Under Age Average 0.6 is Median 0.0 Number of Average 0.9 Household Members Over Age 55 Median 1.0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 Average/Median Numbers ■Total Random Sample RRC Associates 2 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Household Characteristics (Part 3) Number of Does in Average 1.3 Median 1.0 Number of Cats in Average 1.2 Household Median 1.0 Number of Horses in Average 1.0 Household Median 1.0 Number of Other Average 1.3 Animals in Household Median 1.0 0 0.5 1 1.5 Average/Median Numbers ■Total Random Sample RRC Associates 3 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Household Characteristics (Part 4) - Percentage of Households with at Least One Animal Dogs 53% Cats 27% Horses �1% Other Animals 8% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Percentage of Households ■TOTAL RANDOM SAMPLE RRC Associates 4 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Respondent Characteristics Length of Time Less than 1 year 1% Length of Time Living In Rancho 1 - 5 years10% 'Average Median Cucamonga 6- 10 years 13% 20.4 Years 19.5 Years 11 - 15 years21% 16 - 20 years 11% 21 - 30 years 24% 31 - 40 years1090 41 - 50 years 7% 51 or more years ;1% Age of Respondent 18 - 24 12% 25 - 34 21% 35 -4422%X 45 - 54 =16% Age of Respondent 55 - 64 15% Average Median 65 - 747% 44.8 Years43.0 Years 75 or older 6% Gender Male 36% Female I 64% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Percent Responding ■Total Random Sample RRC Associates 5 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Number of Times Used in the Past 12 Months-Current Programs and Facilities City trails 26.1 City parks(playgrounds, shelters) 25.8 City recreation programs/classes for all ages 10.6 City Libraries and Bookmobile 7.9 City athletic/sports fields 5.6 City recreation programs/classes-seniors 5.0 special use facilities/areas(skate park, dog park, 4.1 Epicenter stadium,tennis courts) City sports programs/classes(all ages) 2.8 Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center 2.2 City recreation programs/classes-adult 1.4 City recreation programs/classes-youth 1.1 City equestrian facilities 1.0 'erforming Arts Center- Lewis Family Playhouse 1.0 City Animal Care and Adoption Center 0.8 City recreation programs/classes-teen 0.4 City aquatics programs/classes(all ages) 0.2 City Teen Center 110.1 Other �0.4 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Average Number of Times Used in the Last 12 Months ■Total Random Sample RRC Associates 6 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Percentage of Households Who Used Current Programs and Facilities at Least Once In Past 12 Months City parks(playgrounds, shelters) 78% City trails 75% City Libraries and Bookmobile 65% se facilities/areas(skate park,dog park, Epicenter stadium,tennis courts) 50% City Animal Care and Adoption Center 36% City athletic/sports fields 35% i Performing Arts Center- Lewis Family Playhouse34% V recreation programs/classes-all ages combined 27% City recreation programs/classes-adult 23% City sports programs/classes- (all ages) 22% City recreation programs/classes-seniors 19% City recreation programs/classes-youth 18% Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center17% City equestrian facilities 11% City aquatics programs/classes(all ages)) 7% City recreation programs/classes-teen 6% City Teen Center 3% Other 17% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Percent of Households ■Total Random Sample RRC Associates 7 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Importance of Current Programs and Facilities (Average Rating) City parks(playgrounds, shelters) 4.4 City Libraries and Bookmobile 4.2 City trails 4.2 City Animal Care and Adoption Center 9E 3.7 City athletic/sports fields 3.7 ipecial use facilities/areas(skate park,dog park, 3.7 Epicenter stadium,tennis courts) 'erforming Arts Center- Lewis Family Playhouse 3.7 City sports programs/classes(all ages) 3.5 City recreation programs/classes-adult 3.5 City recreation programs/classes-seniors 3.5 Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center 3.3 City recreation programs/classes for all ages 3.3 City recreation programs/classes-youth 3.3 City aquatics programs/classes(all ages) 3.2 City Teen Center 3.1 City recreation programs/classes-teen 3.0 City equestrian facilities2.8 Other 3.4 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 Average Rating ■Total Random Sample RRC Associates 8 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Importance of Current Programs and Facilities (Percent Important vs. Not Important) City parks(playgrounds,shelters) 84% City trails 82% I City Libraries and Bookmobile 81% City athletic/sports fields ��65% 0 City Animal Care and Adoption Center 64% I :y Performing Arts Center- Lewis Family Playhouse 64% ase facilities/areas(skate park,dog park, Epicenter 63% stadium,tennis courts) City sports programs/classes(all ages) 56% City recreation programs/classes-adult 56% City recreation programs/classes-seniors 54% City recreation programs/classes for all ages 52% City aquatics programs/classes(all ages) 49% Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center 48% City recreation programs/classes-youth 47% City Teen Center 40% i=: City recreation programs/classes-teen 39% City equestrian facilities 32% 40% Other 42% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Percent of Households ■ Important(4 or 5) ■ Not Important(1 or 2) RRC Associates 9 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 How Well Current Programs and Facilities are Meeting Household Needs (Average Rating) City Libraries and Bookmobile 4.6 I!I City parks(playgrounds,shelters) 44 City trails 4.4 )erforming Arts Center-Lewis Family Playhouse 4.3 City Animal Care and Adoption Center 4.2 City athletic/sports fields 4.2 pecial use facilities/areas(skate park, dog park, 4.2 Epicenter stadium,tennis courts) City recreation programs/classes-youth 4.2 City recreation programs/classes-teen 4.1 City recreation programs/classes -seniors 14.1 Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center 4.1 City recreation programs/classes for all ages 4.0 City recreation programs/classes-adult 4.0 City sports programs/classes(all ages) 4.0 City Teen Center 3.9 City equestrian facilities 3•8 City aquatics programs/classes(all ages) 3.7 Other 3.9 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 Average Rating ■Total Random Sample RRC Associates 10 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 How Well Current Programs and Facilities are Meeting Household Needs (Percent Needs Met vs. Needs Not Met) City Libraries and Bookmobile 9 % City parks (playgrounds,shelters) 86% City trails 84% City athletic/sports fields 81% City Animal Care and Adoption Center 81% City recreation programs/classes-teen 81% City recreation programs/classes-youth 79% y Performing Arts Center-Lewis Family Playhouse79% ise facilities/areas(skate park, dog park, Epicenter ==77% stadium, tennis courts) City recreation programs/classes-seniors �71% City recreation programs/classes-adult —I Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center 69% City recreation programs/classes for all ages 65% City sports programs/classes(all ages) 64% City equestrian facilities 60% City Teen Center 58% City aquatics programs/classes(all ages) 57% Other 73% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Percent of Households ■ Important(4 or 5) ■ Not Important (1 or 2) RRC Associates 11 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Current Programs and Faciltiies— Importance vs. Needs-Met Matrix - Random Sample Overall a 75 mportan H erb Higher ImpaRrlcol Law level of nods being met of needs being mee City Parks v 6 L *,Ci[y Trails 0 t i City Ubranes/llookm bile ANkticleSports Fields 0 Special Use Fac.tts m Animal Care/Adoption CV E IMPORT OF pec Pr A IMPORTANCE flet Frog-Ad utt wis Family Playhouse m a n to RATINGS _ og-Seniors z SCORES(3.6) Sports P1Ages41� U m n d Aquatics Frog(All Ages) mFamily S*Ch, ♦--Aec Prog-youth Teen CV to itec Prog-All Ages t y *_-Rec Frog-Teen E Equestrian Fac AA Y Low IrtportwcW Low/mportaricN z.s Lower 1"of needs bung mer ':' r Higher Well of needs bNno met 3,5 4.75 How well needs are currently being met (average rating) RRC Associates 12 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Reasons Why Facilities are Not Used by Households No interest in using 30% other personal issues(e g, health, mobility) 30% Not aware of programs/facilities offered 16% Crowding/not enough space 9% Safety and security 7% Price/user fees 7% Lack of facilities and amenities 6% Need more restrooms 6% Lack of transportation 6% Hours of operation 5% Overall maintenance needs improvement 49% Don't have the programs I want 4% Prefer other recreation providers !2% 4% Lack of parking3% Accessibility % Condition of facilities % None nearby Quality of equipment needs improvementCustomer service/staff knowledge 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% Percent of Households ■Total Random Sample RRC Associates 13 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Other Facilities Used by Households National Forest 40% Private health and fitness clubs 37% County Parks&Open Space 37% Churches 28`M Private or public schools 24% ration facilities and centers in neighboring cities 17% Private instruction (dance, martial arts,etc) 16% None of the above 13% lomeowners Associations/apartment facilities& 7% amenities YMCA/YWCA 2% Others 7% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% Percent of Households ■Total Random Sample RRC Associates 14 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Importance of INDOOR Facilities to be Added, Expanded,or Improved (Average Rating) Indoor children's discovery center/interactive 3.8 museum(2nd Floor of Biane Library) Indoor swimming pool for recreational purposes (learn to swim programs,water fitness, recreational 3.7 open swim) Additional library space 3.7 Additional community use spaces (youth, teen, 3.4 adult, and/or senior) Additional weight room and cardio fitness space 3.3 Additional multi-purpose gymnasium space 3.2 Additional fitness class space 3.2 Other 3.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 Average Rating ■Total Random Sample RRC Associates 15 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Importance of INDOOR Facilities to be Added, Expanded, or Improved (Percent Important vs. Not Important) ndoor children's discovery center/interactive museum(2nd I�63% Floor of Biane Library) Indoor swimming pool for recreational purposes(learn to 62% swim programs,water fitness,recreational open swim) 57% Additional library space dditional community use spaces(youth,teen,adult,and/or �47% senior) 45% Additional weight room and cardio fitness space 42% Additional fitness class space Additional multi-purpose gymnasium space 41% 43% Other 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Percent of Households •Important(4 or 5) ■ Not Important(1 or 2) RRC Associates 16 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Top Three Most Important INDOOR Facilities to be Added, Expanded, or Improved Over Next 5 Years Indoor swimming pool for recreational purposes(learn to 15% �49% swim programs,water fitness,recreational open swim) Indoor children's discovery center/interactive museum(2nd r. 17% 46% Floor of Biane Library) Additional library space 6% 37% Additional community use spaces(youth,teen,adult, 8% 31% and/or senior) Additional fitness class space14% % 19% Additional weight roam and cardio fitness space % 18% Additional multi-purpose gymnasium space 18%Other7% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Percent of Households ■ Most Important Second Most Important ■Third Most Important (Combined) Top Three RRC Associates 17 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Top Three Most Important INDOOR Facilities to be Added, Expanded,or Improved Over Next 5 Years - Open Link Indoor swimming pool for recreational purposes(learn to 72 swim programs,water fitness, recreational open swim) Indoor children's discovery center/interactive museum 56% (2nd Floor of Biane Library) Additional library space 39% Additional weight room and cardio fitness space 33% Additional community use spaces(youth,teen,adult, 18% and/or senior) Additional multi-purpose gymnasium space 11% Additional fitness class space 17% Other 17% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Percent of Households ■Most Important ■Second Most Important ■Third Most Important (Combined)Top Three RRC Associates 18 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Importance of OUTDOOR Facilities to be Added, Expanded, or Improved (Average Rating) Complete Central Park 4.0 Shade structures in park 3.9 Trail connections within Rancho Cucamonga 3.8 Outdoor swimming pool for recreational purposes (learn to swim programs,water fitness,recreational open swim) 3.6 Community gardens/urban agriculture 3.6 Regional trail connections outside Rancho Cucamonga 3.5 Nature-based facilities(e g,outdoor nature/interpretive 3.5 center) Picnic facilities(tables,barbecues,shelters) 3.5 Multi-sport field complex(lighted) 53.4 .5 Community gathering spaces/outdoor event facility/amphitheater New playgrounds 3.3 More lighted athletic fields 3.3 Basketball courts(lighted) 3.3 Outdoor fitness equipment(in parks and trails) 3.2 Expand parking at City parks and facilities3.1 New park in southwest RC 3.1 Splash pad/spray ground 3.1 Open space/undeveloped areas3.1 Additional dog park(s) #=3.0 Additional tennis courts(lighted) 02.9 Other 4.0 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 Average Rating ■Total Random Sample RRC Associates 19 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Importance of OUTDOOR Facilities to be Added, Expanded, or Improved (Percent Important vs. Not Important) I Complete Central Park 70% Shade structures in park 65%n Trail connections within Rancho Cucamonga 63% Outdoor swimming pool for recreational purposes (learn to 60% swim programs,water fitness,recreational open swim) Community gardens/urban agriculture 57% Nature-based facilities(e g,outdoor nature/interpretive 56% center) Regional trail connections outside Rancho Cucamonga 55% Picnic facilities(tables,barbecues,shelters) X53% Community gathering spaces/outdoor event 51% facility/amphitheater Lan Multi-sport field complex(lighted50% Basketball courts(lighted) 47% More lighted athletic fields 46% New playgrounds 46% Splash pad/spray ground 42% Outdoor fitness equipment(in parks and trails) 42% Additional dog park(s) 40% Expand parking at City parks and facilities i 39% Open space/undeveloped areas 37% New parkin southwest RC 37% Additional tennis courts(lighted) 117% Other 69% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Percent of Households ■ Important(4 or 5) ■ Not Important(1 or 2) RRC Associates 20 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Top Three Most Important OUTDOOR Facilities to be Added, Expanded, or Improved Over Next Five Years Complete Central Park 7% 3654 Trail connections within Rancho Cucamonga �� 5% X23% Shade structures in park 9% =21% Outdoor swimming pool for recreational purposes (learn to swim programs,water fitness,recreational open swim) 4% 20% Regional trail connections outside Rancho Cucamonga 6% 13% Multi-sport field complex(lighted) 4% U11% Community gardens/urban agriculture5% :10% 10% Community gathering spaces/outdoor event facility/amphitheater L3% Nature-based facilities(e g,outdoor nature/interpretive center) 3% 9% Outdoor fitness equipment(in parks and trails) 9% Splash pad/spray ground LA896 New park in southwest RC 7% Additional dog parks) 7% Picnic facilities(tables, barbecues,shelters) jn 7% Expand parking at City parks and facilities 6% Open space/undeveloped areas 6% More lighted athletic fields 3% 5% Additional tennis courts(lighted) �J5% New playgrounds _15% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Percent of Households ■ Most Important Second Most Important ■Third Most Important (Combined)Top Three RRC Associates 21 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Top Three Most Important OUTDOOR Facilities to be Added, Expanded, or Improved Over Next Five Years -Open Link Trail connections within Rancho Cucamonga 4 % Complete Central Park 42% Outdoor swimming pool for recreational purposes (learn to 42% swim programs,water fitness, recreational open swim) Multi-sport field complex(lighted) i32% Shade structures in park 26% Splash pad/spray ground 119 Community gathering spaces/outdoor event 16% facility/amphitheater Nature-based facilities(e g,outdoor nature/interpretive 16% center) New park in southwest RC Additional dog parks) 11% Picnic facilities(tables,barbecues,shelters) 11% Expand parking at City parks and facilities 5% Community gardens/urban agriculture 5% Regional trail connections outside Rancho Cucamonga 5% Additional tennis courts(lighted) 5% Other S% New playgrounds 09 Basketball courts(lighted) 0% Open space/undeveloped areas 0% More lighted athletic fields ON Outdoor fitness equipment(in parks and trails) 0% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Percent of Households ■Most Important ■Second Most Important ■Third Most Important (Combined)Top Three RRC Associates 22 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Most Important Facility/Park Options to be Developed Complete Central Park r 20% 42 X Trails and trail connectivity 22% 38% Focus on maintaining what we have 14% 127% Indoor swimming pool for recreational purposes �_ 8% I21% Improve existing parks/community centers/city facilities 10% 20% :M: Children's discovery center/interactive museum 9% 19% Outdoor swimming pool for recreational purposes9% 11596 Multi-sports field complex 10" 9% Improve existing Equestrian Center 2% Gymnasium 1% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% Percent of Households ■ Most Important Second Most Important (Combined)Top Two RRC Associates 23 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Most Important Facility/Park Options to be Developed -Open Link Children's discovery center/interactive museum 53% Complete Central Park 37% Trails and trail connectivity 269 Focus on maintaining what we have 21% Indoor swimming pool for recreational purposes21% Outdoor swimming pool for recreational purposes r16% Multi-sports field complex "11% Improve existing Equestrian Center 5% Improve existing parks/community centers/city facilities 5% Gymnasium 0% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Percent of Households ■Most Important ■Second Most Important (Combined)Top Two RRC Associates 24 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Percentage of Households Indicating a Need for Programs,Activities, and Special Events Special events(e g,concerts/movies in the park, Founders r— Parade,fireworks,community celebrations) 71% Fitness and wellness programs61% Cultural/performing arts programs 55% General education,skills education(computers,cooking, 49% babysitting,etc) Environmental/nature programs 47% Volunteer programs(e g,coaching,senior volunteers, Lewis Family Playhouse and library programs etc) 46% Senior activities 40% ;�� Sports programs-adult 34% Learn to swim programs 34% Family programs =:29% Children/youth activities(non-sport) 2S% Sports programs-youth13% Baby Boomer programs ;:2ri6 Summer day camp 15% I Teen activities 14% Other 14% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Percent of Households ■Total Random Sample RRC Associates 25 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Percentage Level of How Well Program Needs Are Being Met Sports programs-youth �72 Cultural/performing arts programs 72% Sports programs-adult 69% �cial events(e g,concerts/movies in the park,Founders 68% Parade,fireworks,community celebrations) nteer programs(e g,coaching,senior volunteers,Lewis 66% Family Playhouse and library programs etc) Senior activities 64% Fitness and wellness programs 61% Family programs �61% Teen activities 60% Children/youth activities(non-sport) 60% 3eneral education,skills education(computers,cooking, 59% babysitting,etc) Summer day camp 55% Environmental/nature programs 54% Learn to swim programs 54% Baby Boomer programs 40% Other 31% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Average Percentage Level ■Total Random Sample RRC Associates 26 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 How Well Programs Needs are Being Met (Percent Needs Met vs. Needs Not Met) I — Sports programs-youth0 68% Cultural/performing arts programs 66% Sports programs-adult 63% �cial events(e g,concerts/movies in the park,Founders 62% Parade,fireworks,community celebrations) nteer programs(e g,coaching,senior volunteers,Lewis 60% Family Playhouse and library programs etc) Senior activities 56% Learn to swim programs 0 52% Fitness and wellness programs 51% ;eneral education,skills education(computers,cooking, � 49% babysitting,etc) Teen activitie48% Family programs 47% Children/youth activities(non-sport) 45% Summer day camp 43% Environmental/nature programs �43% Baby Boomer programs 28% 53% Other 22% 66% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Percent of Households ■ Needs Met Well (75%or 100%) ■ Needs Not Met Well(0%or 25%) RRC Associates 27 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Top Three Most Important Programs, Activities, and Special Events to be Added, Expanded, or Improved Over Next Five Years Special events(e g,concerts/movies in the park,Founders 311 Parade,fireworks,community celebrations) 11% ��36 Fitness and wellness programs 9% 309 Senior activities5% 21% Environmental/nature programs 6% 19X Cultural/performing arts programs 6% 17% General education,skills education(computers,cooking, 4% 17% babysitting,etc) Sports programs-youth5% 15% Sports programs-adult t 13% Children/youth activities(non-sport) 5% 12% Learn to swim programsJ3%%4% 10% Volunteer programs(e g,coaching,senior volunteers, Lewis Family Playhouse and library programs etc) Io% Family programs 6% Baby Boomer programs 6% Teen activities �49% SII Summer day camp 4% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Percent of Households •Most Important Second Most Important ■Third Most Important (Combined)Top Three RRC Associates 28 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Programs, Activities, Special Events—Importance vs. Needs-Met Matrix- Random Sample Overall 80% Higher number of HH in-need/ 0 m; Higher number of HH in-need/ Lower level of needs being mat z i o T Higher level of needs being met m O O Special Events y O � T Fitness Wellness Frog E W Cultural Performing Ar s 0 CL n Gen Edu/Skills Edu 0 y Env./Nature Frog y d Volunteer dreg a MIDPOINT OF v Na Senior Activities t a IMPORTANCE Learn to Swim Prog RATINGS N Sports Prog-Adult o SCORES(33%) o a L !+ G S Family Frog d A ABaby Boomer Frog _ children/youth Activities c w Sports Prog-youth d *—Teen Activities Summer Day Camp Lower number of HH in-need/ Lower number of HH in-need/ 0% Lower level of needs being met Higher level of needs being met 40% 80% How well needs are currently being met (average percentage rating) RRC Associates 29 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Opinions on Amount of Spending by Rancho Cucamonga 30% Providing current 44% recreation programs S% :: 41% Maintaining existingJ5% parks,trails, recreation 5 `% facilities and community centers 30% Improvements to 17% existing parks,trails, 45% recreation facilities and 7% community centers 32% Building new parks, E!520=4 trails, recreation 35% facilities and community centers 36% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Percent of Households ■Too little 0 About right ■Too much ■ Don't Know RRC Associates 30 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Additional Amount of Tax Willing to Pay Annually Additional Amount of None 35% Assessment Tax Willing to $1 to$2 22% $26 to$50 9% $51to$75 9% $76 to$100 13% More than$10011% Additional Amount of Sales Tax None 40% Willing to Pav 1/8 cent 19% 1/4 cent12% 1/2 cent 9% 1 cent 20% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% Percent of Households ■Total Random Sample RRC Associates 31 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Best and Current Methods of Receiving Communication rapevine/Rancho 45% Reporter 82% E-mail (Listserve) 14% ncho Cucamonga 30% website 035% Posters/Flyers 9% 24% Other 9% nternet/websites Performance on Providing Communication Average:3.7 35% Local newspaper 30% 27% 25% king(i a Twitter, t 25% ebook) $ X8 20% e recreation 1 'S program location , ts% 11% s V channel (RCN) 1 ' to% 4% 5% Family Playhouse 0% ison Brochure ` 2C R ^ ~ Qo Digital billboards h ■Total Random Sample 0% vercenr or nouseri ■ Best Method ■Current Method RRC Associates 32