Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012/08/22 - Agenda Packet - PC ) • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA a kir PLANNING COMMISSION Llj AGENDA CUCAMONGA August 22 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I .I: : CC'ALLTO'ORDER: H) Roll Call Chairman Howdyshell_ Vice Chairman Fletcher_ Munoz_ Wimberly_ Oaxaca • I . M,, ?'APPROVA' iOFMIN,UTES :5' . , - =2,1 August 8, 2012 Regular Meeting Minutes , =,==,1t$HIII ` PUBLIC I E.AR NGS 1':',''. ::,::“L* ;?:::::giNil The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2012-00181 - CHARLIE BUQUET-A request to operate a sales and leasing facility for heavy equipment on 2.75 acres of land within the General Industrial District (Subarea 8), located at 13073 Arrow Route - APN: 0229-141-06 and 07. Related File: Development Review DRC2012-00182. This project is categorically exempt from the requirement of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (Class 32 Exemption — Infill Development projects). B. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2012-00182 - CHARLIE BUQUET - A request to construct in phases a sales and leasing facility for heavy equipment on 2.75 acres of land within the General Industrial District (Subarea 8), located at 13073 Arrow Route - APN: 0229-141-06 and 07. • 1 of 4 e t PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA 0 1 AUGUST 22, 2012 RANCIIO CUCAMONGA Related File: Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-00181. This project is categorically exempt from the requirement of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (Class 32 Exemption — Infill Development projects). C. TRAIL ABANDONMENT DRC2009-00848- DAVID FAJARDO-A request to abandon two portions of a Local Feeder Trail that lead from the trail between residences onto Ranch Gate Road in the Very Low Residential District. The two portions of trail are between 5272 & 5278 Ranch Gate Road and one completely on the south side of 5340 Ranch Gate Road - APNs: 1061-021-02; 1061-021-03; 1061-031-04. This project is categorically exempt from the requirement of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15305 (Class 5 Exemption - Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations). I _ = x IV !NEW BUSINESS: ..,, ,_ . ,, °1 D. REVIEW OF AN UPDATE TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION • ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS AND RELATED PROCEDURES • I ` l e K s4 itywi.`. itti4o COMMENTS } . ' k .i.r This is the time and place for the general public to address the commission. Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda. It '.., VI `:C-,014-IISSICiN BUIlVESS1coMMENTS',:;1 Cr; _'I I w' .VII.' ;ADJOURNMENT`.:' r: ':"!°;-) The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent • of the Commission. I, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on August 16, 2012, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. • 2of4 • PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA La AUGUST 22, 2012 RANCHO CUCAMONGA lexIf you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position,you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the • Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda,you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The Planning Commission Secretary receives all such items. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m.to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any • 3 of 4 re PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA • AUGUST 22, 2012 RANCno CUCAMONGA appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,216 for maps and $2,328 for all other decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us • • 4 of 4 Vicinity Map • Planning Commission Meeting August 22 , 2012 C Aand B r..j /i L A A 9 co 7 N a a E € = V E d a) i ° 1 .�� I I riie er i. se, IIIIR 79th St c 1. t .Base Line • f? Base Line re 7 tv 000411 C,urch i (' ,, cnur�n• foothill's ` �`Igr al FoothilArrow strpc , 'Arrow Jersey .c A 8th K W i ai •∎•rna C9 6th C- ° m Y 6th W N 4th x x 2 11�1 14th 0 • Item D: Review of an update to * Meeting Location: the Planning Commission's administrative City Hall regulations and related procedures. 10500 Civic Center Drive CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting August 8 2012 Chairman Howdyshell called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 7:10 p.m. The meeting was held in the Council Chambers at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Richard Fletcher, Frances Howdyshell, Francisco Oaxaca, Ray Wimberly ABSENT: Lou Munoz STAFF PRESENT: Jeff Bloom, Interim Planning Director; Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner; Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney; Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer; Mayuko Nakajima, Assistant Planner; Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planner; Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary; Mike Smith, Associate Planner ANNOUNCEMENTS • None APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion: Moved by Wimberly, seconded by Oaxaca, carried 4-0-1 (Munoz absent), to approve the minutes of July 25, 2012. CONSENT CALENDAR A. VACATION V-219 - LEWIS DEVELOPMENT CO. - A request to vacate the 100-foot wide temporary Drainage Easement and Maintenance Agreement as shown on-site within portions of Parcels 1 and 2 of Parcel Map 7267, generally located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue-APN: 227-151-38,42,43, 54&55. Related file: DRC2011- 01184. B. RESOLUTION OF DENIAL FOR DRC2011-01094-HMR ARCHITECTS FOR SCI FUNERAL SERVICES Chairman Howdyshell noted a letter had been placed before the Commission for their review. She asked if anyone wanted to pull any items from the Consent Calendar and if not, she would receive a • motion to adopt. Steven Flower,Assistant City Attorney made reference to the letter as it specifically pertains to Item B and the Resolution of Denial. He said it is a letter with a request for a continuance of the item. He noted that considering the request is at the discretion of the Commission. • Motion: Moved by Oaxaca, seconded by Fletcher, to adopt the Consent Calendar as presented. Motion carried by the following vote: 3-0-1-1 AYES: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, OAXACA NOES: NONE ABSTAIN: WIMBERLY ABSENT: MUNOZ - carried * * * * * DIRECTOR'S REPORTS C. BACKGROUND SUMMARY REPORT ON THE WIND TURBINE LOCATED AT THE IEUA REGIONAL PLANT NO. 4 TREATMENT FACILITY Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. In response to Commissioner Wimberly she said the wind turbine was erected without being brought to the Planning Commission as it is a public utility, not in our jurisdiction and they were exempt from our review. She said in that staff is anticipating future requests/inquiries from homeowners, a Development Code Amendment would have to be processed to establish standards for such installations. She said the new General Plan is generally supportive of such sustainability efforts and therefore we will need to have standards in place for their regulation as well as be mindful of safety and noise precautions. Commissioner Fletcher noted that even if the City has no jurisdiction, the City would usually get some design review as a courtesy. He clarified the size of the unit. • Ms Nakamura said we would not want to see these in the commercial or industrial area of this size. She said there is a low likelihood of wind farms here and noted they are about the same height as utility power lines. She said the City is supportive of their goals; this one could power 163 homes per year. She said if considered in context where it is located in the Heavy Industrial zone, this one is in a pretty good location. She noted that even a "fall zone" is considered. Chairman Howdyshell noted the public agencies are exempt, however,the Edison corridor is broad and vast and she would not want to see a wind farm along there. She said we need to be sensitive and cautious. Commissioner Oaxaca said there will be more opportunities in the future for alternative generation facilities and there is a great deal of public property that we have no jurisdiction over. He said the ones that would be in a high visibility area should at least pass by the Planning Commission so we know and have the background so that Commissioners can field questions and concerns that come to them regarding these facilities. The Secretary received and filed the report. D. UPDATE ON THE PROCESS FOR THE SELECTION OF TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBERS AT LARGE • Planning Commission Minutes -2- August 8, 2012 Cancyce Burnett, Senior Planner presented the staff report. She said the Commission needs to select two at large members and staff plans to publish a press release announcing a call for 4111 applications for the equestrian and bicycle at large members. She summarized the process. Vice Chairman Fletcher asked if all 3 regular member terms are up and if they are aware of this. Ms. Burnett said they are aware and we will let them know that if they want to be reappointed they need to apply. The Secretary received and filed the report. PUBLIC COMMENTS None . . . . . COMMISSION BUSINESS AND COMMENTS None . . . . . ADJOURNMENT Motion: Moved by Wimberly, seconded by Fletcher carried 4-0-1 (Munoz absent),to adjourn. The Planning Commission adjourned at 7:27 p.m. • Approved: • Planning Commission Minutes -3- August 8, 2012 • STAFF REPORT�� • PLANNING DEPARTMENT L DATE: August 22, 2012 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jeffrey A. Bloom, Interim Planning Director BY: Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2012-00181 - CHARLIE BUQUET - A request to operate a sales and leasing facility for heavy equipment on 2.75 acres of land within the General Industrial District (Subarea 8), located at 13073 Arrow Route - APN: 0229-141-06 and 07. Related file: Development Review DRC2012-00182. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2012-00182 - CHARLIE BUQUET - A request to construct in phases a sales and leasing facility for heavy equipment on 2.75 acres of land within the General Industrial District (Subarea 8), located at 13073 Arrow Route - APN: 0229-141-06 and 07. Related file: Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-00181. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-00181 and Development Review DRC2012-00182 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: • A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Pipe Storage Yard - Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda South Overlay of the Etiwanda Specific Plan South - Industrial Building and Trucking Yard— General Industrial (Subarea 8) East - Single-Family Residence—General Industrial (Subarea 8) West - Etiwanda Creek - General Industrial (Subarea 8) B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - General Industrial (Subarea 8) North - Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) South - General Industrial (Subarea 8) East - General Industrial (Subarea 8) West - General Industrial (Subarea 8) C. Site Characteristics: The project is located at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Pecan Avenue. The site is currently a vacant dirt lot and has in the past been utilized as a truck and trailer storage yard. To the east across Pecan Avenue, is a legal, non-conforming single-family residential dwelling unit, to the south, is a trucking firm with an industrial office building; to the north across Arrow Route, is a large pipe storage yard with Southern California Edison power lines; and to the west is Etiwanda Creek, followed by a vacant parcel. D. Parking Calculations: The parking calculation for this site is 1 parking space for each 250 square foot of the gross area for the proposed 6,000 square foot 2-story office building. The number of trucks for sale on the lot will depend upon the number of stalls supplied in the • sales area. The proposed parking calculation will require 24 parking stalls, and the project is proposing 37 spaces, a surplus of 13 parking stalls. ITEMS A & B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2012-00181 AND DRC2012-00182 —CHARLIE BUQUET August 22, 2012 Page 2 • Number of Number of Square Parking Spaces Spaces Type of Use Footaqe Ratio Required Provided Truck Sales Office 6,000 1:250 sq. ft. 24 37 ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is proposing to construct and operate a sales and leasing facility for heavy equipment on 2.75 acres of land within the General Industrial District (Subarea 8), located at 13073 Arrow Route. The design of the 6,000 square foot, 2-story concrete tilt-up office and sales building will be consistent in design with the other recently constructed buildings in the area. This area has been blighted over the years, and the addition of newly constructed businesses will help with the revitalization. The concrete tilt-up building will be located near the southeast corner of the site and have a sand blasted concrete wainscot with the same texture around the middle third of the building. The pop-outs on each side of the building will vary in height from 1 to 2 feet over the main portion of the building to provide visual interest and will be painted with Dunn Edwards "Crestline," and the sides and rear of the top third of the building will be painted with Dunn Edwards "Pigeon Grey" along with a portion of the front top third. The 2-inch reveals • around the top of the building, and a band between the first-story windows, with two panels on each side of the pop-out on the front of the building, will be painted with Dunn Edwards "Crisp Muslin." The windows will be inset with dark bronze anodized aluminum frames and grey glass. A steel channel overhead canopy will be located above the front entrance to give patrons an inviting feature distinguishing the front and rear entrance. Access to the site will be taken off Pecan Avenue where a stamped concrete entrance leads to the parking areas that are proposed to be paved with pervious pavers or a similar type of construction material. A sales display area will be located on-site at the northeast corner of the site on the corner of Pecan Avenue and Arrow Route. Along the east, west and north sides of the parking and display area for the trucks, an 8-foot tall wrought iron fence with pilasters spaced approximately 30 feet apart will be constructed. Landscaping will be placed around the perimeter of the property. The applicant is requesting to phase in the project. The majority of the project will be constructed in Phase One, including most on-site improvements and the street improvements on Pecan Avenue. In Phase Two, the applicant is requesting to install the street. improvements on Arrow Route, and in Phase Three, the office building will be constructed. The applicant is stating all phases will be started within 4 years, and a condition has been included in the Resolution of Approval to require this to happen or the Conditional Use Permit will be brought back for review and possible revocation. • A & B 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2012-00181 AND DRC2012-00182 — CHARLIE BUQUET August 22, 2012 • Page 3 B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Munoz, Wimberly, Granger) reviewed the project on July 3, 2012, and recommended approval to the Planning Commission. C. Technical Review and Grading Committees: The Technical Review and Grading Committees reviewed the project on July 3, 2012, and recommended approval. D. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under the Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In-Fill Development) because the applicant is proposing to construct a building and parking lot in an area and meets all the criteria for this exemption in the 2012 CEQA Guidelines. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Design Review DRC2010-00868 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval and Standard • Conditions. Respectfully submitted, effrey A. loom Interim Planning Director JAB:SF/ge Attachments: Exhibit A - Site Utilization Map Exhibit B - Site Plan Exhibit C - Elevations Exhibit D - Landscape Plan Exhibit E - Grading Plan Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-00181 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2012-00182 • A & B 3 0 i 1 g ! g , .1 A , Zji - X 1 e 2 ■ n v es.1.°'a" e g 4 _ --, ONISV31 28 S31VS ...... 4 !.:i =3 N IN3Vid11103 AAV3H , =a . , :Al ; lit _ ilj`il Pei , golo> =t 111 • . .,..c.„..„. _....„-_,,,,! ,74f - .:W ti aiiiMmt,t -,0".,-s...i., . v -4, ._.;;;;„7,;}0, .,! ii 1 erew,-,44.0 . --_,-------7T,E,e:2-.7.71,4 . t ,.a.sita*tiff-iii.:,, 'Ft 1-.,kie.,;„Til-4,1,7 : 1.- . iHt i ,,,,,w mcitnittk'ssitS.-.4tfle: a , 14 rtf.,_--, 4, -.--,714,e,.c.:- .-s..r . *;t4f..-.4..A .r,-, ,,-!--,-.1 ...•=1„,ft;:4...-*:-_-_,--:Z,-.--47,„.0.4.;y412 : ' F.,..--7 -to=4 s•Wijltb:#;:s ' t2rt4-1i% .1' -%qiiicAborittrwitif-= 0,41 , pt ,,i.:' f, :71141. ' 44'1,• • . -1(4: 4, , .1. . m.w.i'■ .„... -4Th„,r,4,vatt,..... ,. ,,, r„ 41.11*dr. ." ";-' 7 : •Allieitr, iiilLA AL -.. :It e: Wgg it 0 :. •ii-L__.:,-':>7-.L.,-,-.'" ....-7.--._ ',.',.*4 '--.7 ;g42'i..if. t:... .‘7.-..-.7.,Y,-1/4t.-, -7-4i-;i4.f44($1.:E.,*_ P :..... ,,,. ,t-41,t--N-....... ',co:, .T. . - ■■Ct-IIMP.a. .4„c"P:11,441.4 ,. .,:;9;pc ;:tr.;;;44""---`14:Alka, , , • ''''''' $,, ..‘").-,,tia:;.•:144,1 1;114-.P•7-KFI:f4;c--11,..-V4-7-i.r.ft.,:N,--.N..z.--- -.2e,..-v 01 . .*_,. ,.',",7F;111c-'4t,1/4., '•,'1.,-di:J.-.•' f-:±1.:::0- --,;-" :1;iii:,:,:;-,". . it--sr-, ^7 co ,.:...,,7-14 oie:- •.v•-•r t. ly-iz.''tit-it;41,117.(:;f:i 71-' 7,T7 - t .:;:k-N-t: -.7 7.'--tt47, iair,‘,F4a. - -‘ 4r,..r. --a*. c4.--- Cr,: ' ..-1.-0417:77 1 iitirel., mik Ink:, '414iirett •til' kt..-1t;t4;?;:t.:Arfiv: ,2ipiN, i _„ • „. „.,,:b ___„...,.. :___ .t • ••... . . „0,,....,T.„,.„2_, :tr ii ri'C-f.:1;P:141•1•11 ;4'4_..: - '''":1-itz',..4,.!..;..,,,krtf.-'al ..1_0,-.•1-fli'_ ...c)...4352 \ , ik-:5.71:;,."-- th,i iiit4-7: br Ilr A- • "--4 .. , •t,114 . . 7, 7 Jr?ii:.14j: ..'l'T ,, 2tar„:"IP-2.1.fi ir‘j:;;444c ir- :,:.,s:ast 11 Cr, ■. 1 -7 ' ::‘ ':fl.'tr:,:ltik intk-'5;;I'3:- -' - lilt" k. :i -` :1., . '' .;:J`' ' i.,, ;fti'r-' — .., 2 A - 0 1 EXHIBIT A A & B 4 '• WWII U IDFOW ewo/pep•e6uoweonp oyouea°- •'�"—•`• Aem16IH mow)/ELK I 8 LZOEI. eP Axwveo V3 = Iili 6u!seel 19 seleg ""`` ilaz tarsi aw q 'C1 1;a Tuewdinb� AneaH NVid 311S al° wa¢vw eevww1131,1d 0 1 E ?!. a 1 R ,'' iit8 is § 8 a __ � 7 fi%/• .,-_—.„-s-/I"—.__r 'j. __'�-(�' ' �° '3 ° ` •1 11 /1 :. t —III , .. '� _r `0� a " ° 5, lI•'i' II,[,. - • 1,:( 1 )• ill, �I IL . .,>,;: -,-" 1 33 fi 4'1 fir; ran 'lit r 1 ."@, ' p `�Ld �$ ` '� {[.9q H hit Bg U a \ - � r----- -- ssd '1 a t J--" - �i .tt45 iS St g�9y221t ?i 0 '•1 I` .3 "th 33 53'3 a I i, e _ {{ ���� a N /r''' _IV .�� i � III I •.. �S 1 � L C)°- ('_-'� — �I'� •€• IIII i �¢i rs�I � ° � .k i ` ! f it 1 t. li et "Er A '/�.L ,,4, i 1 1 r 1 '4-1 r 1 ! 7, rol !I", - Li 11 ---71 h - t I. 9a i •� r. -i . , ee 17 11 11 1 Dm. � 'mil 1 ep, F `i E ; � 1 I:]I, �- _� �I B dill 31� i� JIhq -t b @yp Q• A4 � 'sSO �37 v � FE {I' w Ei■ a II 1 r" MallINIII Il lIII l Aliki. li I�, IIII '� �= — , ; � 'I r ��� _■ � -; =-a .I c .I i + 3 III fIj,�j'. ■— �_., 1 MUM 12 I V` SIP ?lit E Q ! 91 meal (f4 d i .°. "1. no I. g °1 i • `,II I r II 1 •I i IE 9 ,14 —sr= . ''I ' i �Q�; [� I 1 tl_ � '- _ . l ,' �f x ��-=-„:,t I ••f If'IT n '' -mod_= --- _. 4 �.1+.-,� `: ;.• ill101 _ _ - h 7 c- y i� iV C- tc�-��z; MI I i 1 1 0 N 1_ i 14 a � 'III '\��i,'gR'I y ,, n li ill! (iii i I? ? NI i 4 • � � iI, Yi6i �r=_� I�� _'�� �® w Maki ? � u =II�� Z IEXHIBIT B N ii s w w NO A & B 5 I-3 mac` V` ,43 • fn„ ^ ' F r1 met II a R {', ®&1 I` o , �sI w w ?° I ? l'1f 2 14 5' ri{j; .1 p q Ltsrtu11,..-; I i I 1 I : # a I 1 I [tl � JL s _p t; ! T Z a � � L A ir , V. - P:4 i 0 a trill i 3 ' ? F _Pi Q Z O -v1h• s A I u. s� '6 a: 'I _ W Z 4"1,, »=t "? t3 co rf 0t `� `t a' # �+„'7>3La,;:,.?L'`;4-,t zg- W 5 ti414 _ R:s _ n ea521".ar,'.Fzs J O /ate • v- CC Z H u, Na2 - O- aa,- �:;s,.=, v.t .4F.aiA`rxir,C1:'l v' ':.^r.=,,e ' *S 2 U W co. Rn ,,,v e•,,,3,.. ';pan"{,,., sr?{;�.--� , S�._'::s'�"" Cl- QC Z , OrvK v. '% • t"Pk%am ✓ �ka3•ra „'hi F- 4x -t--. -e c - ?'- - 0 R� (..) " 4.1 it - rt M .erns. rc avvia 3 5-; ../Afy� 0 0 k A,°� n t :91 I' 4«� T O PO 1 }I id x�.i iwYi 1 T9I.'Gai a :i �' ~ 0•i }� e- ®.aria 1 > en Z ( I -,0 +mot; 1 F,, 4� , - _ iz o 1A.„ j o 0 w f 1 w co Kr 1 ( w 'e�,4 i_ t 1 to f sp 9,j ;M ( Y rJJ c'"""'hi , yi6 1 y" S'r`i I I. ,. z 1. �.: {r{hag44, WV. ..f ® �'( • i . l I �' f r. tyh e • 4 I EXHIBIT C A & B 6 """"-'--.— `ei eiwojgeo•e6uoweono oyouea emu amnm ' .e AeM4B!H MaLy£LOE l V LZOE I ve a wen CNJ I.? y�, C �'{f 6uiseaj g sales p�,,,,.51 q�� lip 941901 luawdinba AneaH SNOUVn3i3u0e11x0 N 1 111.11111111111111111. .111111MM r _I 1 EE l"I_I 1 IN I`�l_I it. . �, 1 ifffi{ • NH ! ,1ffi{,_.....• it 6 it ,,, :. s it.> 9 I' 'I I'� II' :?+„.., 5 . 1 =�= L J d SMIISF _zp 41/ Of N N 1 U- { fs _ 31 I{ Ill gi gill sfr{ 4f ill {i II :f! —gi `i {{ it.' ! { eE 1 id ! : p al Ill P...- liflt 4f! 11 �fE 11 nairdig;{ Inn ¢ 1 111! � ' 1 il 1! '- [kS343 Pa3 Bf€ m.mm z ;AEI F 1438 < E i1t �Yevwvaw r- 1 1,,,.71,„. b w..,.. �3 1f! �6'-t-iiIrr 2 P = 1!433!31 §4 Id hi 1 {9 _. t te , 9 1 1 :fE 1 w q ifs 1. li4rrr s{ { lit! € Id/ jilMi.l.l.fl. ] z Y{�i�! QBi !Bt{ ' III i �f{ 6 ! v 3 t ! • �. { {� ° f N it! 19 1111 1 LL 11 Ln 1! , 'II ,,!t liri 4Y! I 3 !�1• ! i �I i �I{z! ®� '{ if n {d !{ i{ 0 id Iiiirn1a EMI ®�® 1111 pp� —1111 � . l Il _ I o F 49 III , O: = w ff r {6 1—. 3.E ;ha �, A Pit B 7'u3I Qo.1i eiwopleO'eBuaweanJ oy=uey I nil o I23 I Aex+IOIH NOW ME 4[tOE• V "612 m y, p .flea 7�Po� Bulges-1V saleg w J q°Fry_. !S� I luewdmb� �(neaH NVldadVDSONVS r 1 1p/p I Ln1� so¢+n' y lVflld3JNOJ — f-__ !k 3AV NV03d_ — 46i p68 �6� — (g 1114 _a it ®� u�\\�O\\\\O\\\O\ c\S\�\\\\\\\\\\\\\4\\\\\\\-. ®v _s a ' ``' gp 7 �. Si H`b- :eoa ra ■as•tis 3` A - 3 .' g Y —e Vii 1 % ' eta F I� pµ¢ p �v I\!X1'41 !! !P!!l I dips 11P1 ao-moo a •∎; s. s g 7 e a pN! L. i" 3q_ SS § 1� : ` '®. p2 I ,. 4. i n s 8 5a g (�� {� ! e 1. 5 S % 8p li $ [[[ .f_ .3 h r it � ' � 1i ffffff f 1-+, , o 0 0 o s i 113,` ;`# iv. n PP ill g_ ( =I, \ pppppppppppppppppp]p_ S ��I �� E y E'� 94 P 1 it cc.w, I iilig gg EEE \.. : "� fttttttttttlr I.' fttt F 5 .9 g a q4 i 3 p 8 9 9 maks 1 13 \. � rte"- r 0 iig ft �j � t 711 i t =� fi; = 0 0 0 0 0 0 } dyg 3pfp: _�� � f pi p/ @ pI 3! 91 \` lip rfffff : N f� 4 i pp 1 p1 I, V .eE 4FlSa ‘?. 6I p!. 13 S 1 ill a f—fIIIIIfr� f I ���� fttttttttttE 1 € Ili pm p ir �a4�' ` 1 4 3 �i I ii e1D's4 .. m= 3 38 j1 \ Lq :.l n��.1 .�i:. }4�l/..f.�.6z.6„ �.e3�B���.�fl .c�> 1 r s °pi qix Lt- - LI o,2. \11 — -�33tl� v ! g E 0 4 Ra Lq a= ig! I— $�yi -....VONVMIL31SV3Y� — 88 T 95 • Y• ��h-,. ._..i., a YW 4 a s: H r £;0 02 h gil ggp ss dg8� 's 6 ii EXHIBIT D A & a 8 r @rs z s € ft ?§�: J eiwo/IIe0'eBuaw¢an3 o4ouey wmou ZNOTOthl .e. RemyBIH mouV ELBEL 4 LZBEL 81 'ulw,rao N °'o=;� .;!�e � �`� 6uiseal safes Q_, IL I4 tt ! „_,,,Bail I ;uawdmb3 (neaH SNOLLO3S >kttil.l:Il�l ® i 8- - • t — { I Ft _ 3AV NVO3c ^ a p g 6 g4 i 8 —0 co r q @ "� g I W f'$ 8 7 e I o Igo 111 lig lis s g Its .� o e �_ coq ppig O 1 @ frit �w = o a o 0 0 0 1 s! i c �4 �E � ,yyW k o 0 100 a . 5S 22 8 3B S .., $ $ 5 gag ��B yQ$ 9 @3c$ g9 $ > 7771-- il` , -t:a , H l�r/ .�;o r" - — — 9gc i 14:4415.C' c iii • ;v 4 I�141 e — 1. — / 1 : . , 040::. 1 ''� " ,b6 ^> 001 • ��\\` , k 11 41 I Q� °4141 ty I i II 1/41 : .. Qf�p (Y 1 ��-tee i \\ �y ate' day,,{, I '� gp s'c. _ y1 � y n e'�F Its II Jt t�l hi n s S e e pp� gh [ • -r e : q I ag € �'q r d 1! v. 6: �� A&3-9 °"""--""— eiuiopleo'e6uoweonp oyouey muwu Thin e. Aem1.161H MOJV ELOEL 8 LZOE l via as woo 'd' 5 y " sl ; 6uiseel +g sales a.`=� Q o `e im_r9i am q� '° juewdinbE AABOH Oil 9p3Mel sNOUrnaia aoinalx3 . _3 y y a �iJT �I < �aF *hi ist@ la Olt ihtl.: illtir b a il. c i 4 . 1110 •c �a ,i E - til �i-.ri it • II : • r .� �7 • )r ,I 'I1 t- - f I pc3 a `2i.:6 'y I�' j:VI f '. ;,� I` TIC {loll I 9 L_ , -__y_ R s3.�>g :I 'y ( '. I•"�: ; g . .§( §W <i - |. I] •r, . so - [ §»: 1 Al �j||§i - ! §),\! ' .\ ; §[! ; ƒ = . 11 to / - {/ ƒ- : � ' �� - . R» : t ƒ: \t / ! } ! ;,, . \ : [ , ' ~ \ ! 0 ;, i • ` \| . E : \/ 00 ) 1 - ) . \ - . . % I _ : • | i 2 _ !% • � � !§ §& \ - | \ | / ! / . Hilt : , - : .% \ _ q! I IL¢ _ ] ; %l . e , ; \EJ §r ! ! r ! _ j\ , g':2 : , , , 5 05AA ; A & B 12 RESOLUTION NO.12-37 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2012-00181, A REQUEST TO OPERATE A SALES AND LEASING FACILITY FOR HEAVY EQUIPMENT ON 2.75 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT(SUBAREA 8), LOCATED AT 13073 ARROW ROUTE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 0229-141-06 and 07. A. Recitals. 1. Charlie Buquet, on behalf of Cal S&S LLC, filed an application for the approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-00181, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 22nd day of August 2012, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a public hearing on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: • 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on August 22, 2012, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located on the southwest corner of Pecan Avenue and Arrow Route, with a street frontage of approximately 542 feet and a lot depth of approximately 280 feet, and is presently an unimproved vacant lot; and b. The property to the north of the subject site, is undeveloped land used as a pipe storage yard with Southern California Edison power lines on it and is zoned Low Medium Residential and Open Space; the property to the south is developed with a trucking firm and an industrial office building and is zoned General Industrial (Subarea 8) and; the property to the east across Pecan Avenue is developed with a legal non-conforming single-family residence and is zoned General Industrial (Subarea 8); and the property to the west, is the Etiwanda Creek, and west of that is undeveloped vacant land and is zoned General Industrial (Subarea 8); and c. The project consists of the construction and operation of a sales and leasing facility with a sales lot and a proposed 6,000 square foot two-story concrete tilt-up office building. The project will be constructed in phases. The majority of the project will be constructed in Phase One such as most on-site improvements and the street improvements on Pecan Avenue. In Phase Two, • the applicant is requesting to install the street improvements on Arrow Route and in Phase Three, construct the office building; and A & B 13 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-37 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2012-00181 — CHARLIE BUQUET August 22, 2012 Page 2 • d. The project conforms to the basic Development Standards of the Development • Code which requires conformance with the height, setback, and parking regulations of the zoning district. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan by encouraging uses that are compatible with the surrounding uses and activities that do not have a negative impact on the surrounding area; and b. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located by obtaining approval of a Conditional Use Permit which is required for the proposed use in this zoning district; and c. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code in that the use requires a Conditional Use Permit to be processed in conjunction with this Development Review for the construction of the sales and leasing facility within the Industrial Zoned Districts; and d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity as wrought iron fencing, landscaping, and street improvements have • been proposed to minimize any impacts on the surrounding area. 4. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under the Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In-Fill Development)because the applicant is proposing to construct a building and parking lot in an area and meets all the criteria for this exemption in the 2012 CEQA Guidelines. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the operation of a sales and leasing facility with a sales lot and 6,000 square foot concrete tilt-up office building located at 13073 Arrow Route -APN: 0229-141-06 and 07. - 2) Outdoor storage of items on the property was not reviewed. Any future outdoor storage, other than vehicles parking in the parking lot and sales, lot is not allowed. • A & B 14 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-37 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2012-00181 — CHARLIE BUQUET August 22, 2012 Page 3 • 3) No exterior changes to the design of the project, including exterior materials, shall be permitted without prior City review and approval. 4) Maintenance of vehicles on the property was not reviewed and is not allowed without prior approval from the Planning Department. 5) Final phasing of the project shall be started within 4 years from the approval of this application, or it will be brought back to the Planning Commission for review and possible revocation of Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-00181. 6) Wrecked or inoperable tractors shall not be stored on the site. 7) Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 8) The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times, and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 9) Free-standing light standards shall not exceed 25 feet or the height of the shortest on-site building. All lighting shall be shielded to confine the light spread to within the boundaries of the site. Engineering Department • 1) Processing of a lot merger to combine the separate parcels into one is recommended, prior to Building Permit issuance. 2) Arrow Route frontage improvements shall be widened in accordance with City "Major Arterial" standards including, but not limited to: a) Curb and gutter 36 feet south of the street centerline, asphalt pavement to centerline of the street, curvilinear sidewalk, 9500-lumen HPSV street lights, street trees, traffic striping, and signage and drainage facilities as determined necessary. Install rip-rap erosion control at the west property line. b) Install pavement transitions within the existing right-of-way, both east and west of the project site, with asphalt curbs to contain • street run-off. c) Street trees per the Street Tree form. d) The widening of the street at the existing culvert at the northwest corner of the applicants site is not the responsibility of the applicant and is anticipated to be part of a future City project. The applicant's street plans for Arrow Route must be completed prior to the issuance of any permits by the Building and Safety Department. In anticipation of a City project for the resurfacing of Arrow Route, should • a phasing plan be approved for Arrow Route, the applicant's phasing plan shall incorporate all utility connections in Arrow Route, interim drainage, and street improvements with the proposed final City street A & B 15 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-37 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2012-00181 — CHARLIE BUQUET August 22, 2012 Page 4 resurfacing project. The completion of all street improvements, • regardless of City completion, shall be the responsibility of the applicant no later than 4 years from the date of this approval, or prior to final occupancy of the Building Permit at the site, whichever comes first. 3) Installing frontage improvements on Arrow Route will concentrate the flows in the gutter that discharges to the property to the west. This will need to be mitigated on-site or within the existing right-of-way to the west. 4) On-site mitigation facilities are subject to the approval of the Building Official. Any alternate proposals to drain to a public facility are subject to City approval. 5) Pecan Avenue public frontage improvements shall be installed in accordance with the City "Industrial" Standards including, but not limited to: a) Install curb and gutter at 22 feet from the street centerline, street pavement to centerline of street, property line adjacent sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, traffic signing and striping and street trees. b) All driveways shall be in accordance with the City Driveway Policy. • c) Street trees per the Street Tree form. All street improvements shall be installed, completed, and accepted by the City prior to the start of operation of the first phase. 6) An irrevocable offer of dedication shall be made for the Master Plan Storm Drain facilities to replace the Etiwanda Creek Channel. Ultimately, we need a 25-foot wide storm drain easement, but the construction easement shall encompass the entire channel area. 7) Development is within Area 10 of the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Drainage Policy. Developments of less than 5 acres are not required to construct the storm drain facilities specified for Area 10 developments. Instead, they shall pay the Master Plan Drainage Fee. Area 10 developments of less than 5 acres shall show they are protected from possible flooding and, if necessary, construct any and all interim and ultimate facilities needed to protect themselves. 8) The subject site is currently located entirely within an area of special flood hazard. Your construction project shall comply with the requirements of Ordinance 757. 9) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) on the opposite side of Pecan Avenue, shall be • paid to the City prior to the issuance of Building Permits. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the Pecan Avenue frontage from the north to the south project boundary. A & B 16 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-37 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2012-00181 — CHARLIE BUQUET August 22, 2012 Page 5 • 10) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) on the opposite side of Arrow Route shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of Building Permits. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the Arrow Route frontage from the west to the east project boundary. Building and Safety (Grading): 1) Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s)shall be in substantial conformance with the approved Conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2) A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at Grading and Drainage Plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3) A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. • 4) The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 5) A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 6) The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures, and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 7) If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8) A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. • 9) It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. A & B 17 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-37 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2012-00181 — CHARLIE BUQUET August 22, 2012 Page 6 10) It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage acceptance letter(s) from adjacent downstream property owner(s) or discharge flows in a natural condition (concentrated flows are not accepted) and shall provide the Building and Safety Official a drainage study showing that the proposed flows do not exceed the existing flows prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 11) It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed off-set from the property line. 12) The Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right-of-way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 13) The Grading and Drainage Plan shall Implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 14) All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot off-set from the public right-of-way • or adjacent private property. 15) Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 16) The maximum parking stall gradient is 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the current adopted California Building Code. 17) Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per the City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. 18) The final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100 feet beyond project boundary. 19) The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 20) This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. • • A & B 18 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-37 • CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2012-00181 —CHARLIE BUQUET August 22, 2012 Page 7 • 21) The precise Grading and Drainage Plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit." 22) Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations, the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative,the grading contractor, and the Building Inspector to discuss the grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the Grading Permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the Building Permit; • iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; and iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 23) Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, the Engineer of Record shall certify the functionality of the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Best Management Practices (BMP) devices. 24) The Water Quality Management Plan shall include a copy of the project conditions of approval. 25) Please note that at this conceptual level, a review of the accessibility access is not performed. It is the responsibility of the applicant to meet all accessibility requirements. • 26) Please note that a conceptual Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Best Management Practices (BMP)exhibit was not provided A & B 19 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-37 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2012-00181 —CHARLIE BUQUET August 22, 2012 Page 8 for consideration by the Design Review Committee or the Planning • Commission. SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1) The applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Services Director prior to issuance of the Grading Permit for any underground Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Best Management Practices (BMPs). 2) Any affected utility purveyors including, but not limited to, Southern California Edison shall approve all plans that impact their easement, including utilities, storm drain, slopes, and street trees and landscaping prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. A note shall be included on all pertinent plans requiring the affected utility company to be notified two working days prior to starting any work in the vicinity of their easement. 3) The applicant shall obtain written comments from any affected utility purveyors including, but not limited to, Southern California Edison regarding site design restrictions within their easement, and provide a copy of said comments to the Building and Safety Services Director for review. 4) Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to • constructing walls along common lot lines,the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 5) Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit, the applicant shall provide to Building and Safety Services Director a copy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan for review prior to recordation of the document. The Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be recorded prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. 6) The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 7) A Waste Discharge Identification Number(WDID) shall be provided on the title sheet of the Grading Plan prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 8) Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit, a soils report shall be • provided with soil percolation recommendations for the underground infiltration chambers. A & B20 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-37 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2012-00181 —CHARLIE BUQUET August 22, 2012 Page 9 • 9) Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit, the applicant shall obtain a recorded drainage easement from the downstream property owners accepting concentrated drainage flows. This is specifically for major storm event flows at the common driveway at the southwest corner of the site. Should the adjacent property owner deny an easement accepting storm water drainage flows, said storm water shall be discharged to the adjacent creek with drainage structures meeting applicable flood control requirements. 10) A Grading Bond will be required to be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Director for review and approval prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. 11) All roof drainage flowing to the public right-of-way (Pecan Avenue) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. 12) Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit,the applicant shall record an easement and agreement with the adjacent property to accept private sewage disposal for the subject property. 13) Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit, the applicant shall submit a copy of the previously approved private sewage disposal permit and associated plans along with calculations showing that the existing • private sewage disposal system on the adjacent southerly property can accommodate the projected sewage flows from the subject property. Included in this review will be a set of plumbing plans showing all fixtures. WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN • 1) A Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 2) An updated Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) was not provided for review by the Building and Safety Services Department. The following comments are from the April 2012 review of the WQMP document. 3) The Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Goodman and Associates dated April 2012 has been reviewed and deemed "Incomplete" dated April 24, 2012. The following corrections are required prior to the final approval of the WQMP: Page Section Item • 4.1.1 For the underground infiltration units, please add a note similar to the following: All underground chambers shall be inspected by the owner on a biennial basis with a report given to the City of Rancho A & B 21 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-37 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2012-00181 —CHARLIE BUQUET August 22, 2012 Page 10 Page Section Item • Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The owner shall pay for all costs associated with the inspection and report preparation." 4.1.1 Please include all the proposed BMPs including the pavers. 4.1.1 Provide an inspection and maintenance schedule that can be followed by the operator of the facility and can be reviewed by City of Rancho Cucamonga staff on the required biennial inspections. This inspection and maintenance schedule must also be shown on the WQMP BMP exhibit. A blank log is not acceptable. 4.1.2 Include the manufacturer's specific recommendations for inspection and maintenance for the "Infiltration Units" in the section. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is required to provide inspections on the site on a biennial basis; therefore, specific inspection directives are required. 4.3 Please include the title of the person working for the entity responsible for the BMP Operation and Maintenance. 5.1 Please include the required contact information (including the title of the individual) of the entity responsible for the BMP funding. Include the name, title, address and telephone number. This is to assist the City staff as personnel changes occur in the future. WQMP BMP exhibits: Please include the maintenance requirements and inspection schedule. In addition, provide a detail for each BMP for • facilitate the City's required biennial inspections. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF AUGUST, 2012. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Frances Howdyshell, Chairman ATTEST: Jeffrey A. Bloom, Secretary I, Jeffrey A. Bloom, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of August 2012, by the following vote-to-wit: • A & B 22 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-37 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2012-00181 —CHARLIE BUQUET August 22, 2012 Page 11 • AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN COMMISSIONERS: • • A & B 23 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT io, liteigi DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: DRC2012-00181 AND DRC2012-00182 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICANT: CHARLIE BUQUET LOCATION: 13073 ARROW ROUTE —APN: 0229-141-06 AND 07. ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • General Requirements Completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its / /_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval,or in the alternative,to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may,at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 12-37 and 12-38, /_/_ Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans(full size). The sheet(s)are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The _/_/_ project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Notice of Exemption -$50 X B. Time Limits 1. Conditional Use Permit and Development/Design Review approvals shall expire if building _/ /_ permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. • 1 A & B 24 Project No DRC2012-001 B1 and DRC2012-00182 Completion Date C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include / / • site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping,sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions / /_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for /_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 5. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code,all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 6. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved / /_ by the Planning Director and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 7. Trash receptacle(s)are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and /_/_ • the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 8. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be _/_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 9. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, / /_ including proper illumination. D. Building Design 1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or / /_ projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 2 • A & B 25 Project No. DRC2012-00181 and DRC2012-00182 Completion Date 2. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main / /_ building colors. IllParking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space abuts _/ /_ a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide. 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall / /_ contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 3 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, _/ /_ and exits shall be striped per City standards. 4. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the Planning Director, City Engineer, and / /_ Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 5. Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more / /_ parking stalls. Designate two percent or one stall; whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped. 6. Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more _/_/_ parking stalls. Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent. The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet. F. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in / / • the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 percent / /_ within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees -24-inch box or larger. 3. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking /_/_ stalls. 4. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one _/ /_ tree per 30 linear feet of building. 5. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water / /_ efficient landscaping as defined in Ordinance 823 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code G. Signs 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. /_/_ Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. • 3 A & B 26 . Project No DRC2012-00181 and DRC2012-00182 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909)477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) H. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: / /_ a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans(2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams,water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number(i.e., DRC2012-00181 and DRC2012-00182)clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. _/ / Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers'Compensation coverage to / /_• the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. / / 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the _/ /_ Building and Safety Department. I. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be /_/_ marked with the project file number(i.e., DRC2012-00181 and DRC2012-00182). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes,and all other applicable codes,ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or / /_ major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permits issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map /_/_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. 4 • A & B 27 Project No. DRC2012-00181 and DRC2012-00182 Completion Date 4. For projects using septic tank facilities, written certification of acceptability, including all /_/_ supportive information, shall be obtained from the San Bernardino County Department of • Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building permits. 5 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6.30 a.m. Monday /_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 6 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public _/ /_ counter). J. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/ /_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations / /_ 3 Provide draft stops in attic-areas. / /_ 4. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A /_/_ 5. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A. / /_ 6. Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. _/_/_ K. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code,City Grading /_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial • conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to /_/_ perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the / /_ time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, / /_ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for _/_/_ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer. • 5 A & B28 Project No. DRC2012-00181 and DRC2012-00182 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT,(909)477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • L. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, /_/_ community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas,street trees,traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets(measured from /_/_ street centerline). 50 feet total feet on Arrow Route _/_/ 33 feet total feet on Pecan Avenue _/_%_ 3. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. / /_ 4. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or /_/_ noted on the final map. NI. Street Improvements 1. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source / /_ of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these condition's of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except:that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and • maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: / /_ Curb& A.C. Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail Other Arrow Route X X X n/a X X n/a n/a n/a Pecan Avenue X X X X X X n/a n/a n/a Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item (e) modify existing for local street connection (f) maintain existing LMD area until the project is approved/accepted by the City. 3. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights,and intersection safety lights _/ /_ on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. 6 • A & B 29 Protect No. DRC2012-00181 and DRC2012-00182 Completion Date b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a _/_/_ construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in • addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking,traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit,and _/_/_ interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City /_/_ Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. e Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with _/ /_ adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 4. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in / /_ accordance with the City's street tree program. 5. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as-follows. The completed _/ /_ legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet (typically sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The Engineering Services Department reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer. Min. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Qty. • Arrow Route Lagerstoemia Crape Myrtle Hybrid 3' 20' 24" Fill indica tuscarr Pink O.C. Box In Pecan Avenue Tristaniopsis Water Gum 3' 25' 15 Gal Fill laurina O.C. In Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting,an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. N. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting _/_/_ Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. • 7 A & B 30 Project No. DRC2012-00181 and DRC2012-00182 Completion Date O. Drainage and Flood Control 1. The project(or portions thereof)is located within a Flood Hazard Zone;therefore,flood protection / / • measures shall be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. P. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system,water, gas, / /_ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. / /_ 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the /_/_ Cucamonga Valley Water District(CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District,and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits,whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. Q. General Requirements and Approvals 1. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage /_/_ Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 2. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all / / • new street lights for the first 6 months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 3. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees /_/_ shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first Building Permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: R. Security Lighting 1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. / /_ These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. 2. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings,with _/_/_ direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. 3. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. / / 8 • • A & B 31 i. Project No. DRC2012-00181 and DRC2012-00182 Completion Date S. Security Fencing • 1. All businesses or residential communities with security fencing and gates will provide the police _/ /_ with a keypad access and a unique code. The initial code is to be submitted to the Police Crime Prevention Unit along with plans. If this code is changed due to a change in personnel or for any other reason, the new code must be supplied to the Police via the 24-hour dispatch center at (909)941-1488 or by contacting the Crime Prevention Unit at(909)477-2800 extension 2474 or extension 2475. T. Windows 1. Security glazing is recommended on storefront windows to resist window smashes and impede _/ / entry to burglars. U. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime / /_ - visibility. V. Alarm Systems 1. Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed. Instructing management and _/_/ employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in turn save dollars and lives. 2. Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriffs dispatch number: (909) 941-1488. / /_ PLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY- DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION NNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING NDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • 9 A & B32 . es Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection c� District FIRE Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS May 1, 2012 Heavy Equipment Sales & Leasing 13027 Arrow DRC2012-00181 & 182 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT The project must comply in design and constructed in accordance with the 2010 California Building & Fire Codes, the RCFPD Ordinance FD50 and the RCFPD Standards. The RCFPD ordinance, procedures & standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web www.cityofrc.us FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply Reference the RCFPD Standard 5-10 FSC-2 Fire Flow • 1. The required minimum fire flow for this project, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed is 1500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoring. This requirement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 2. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 3. Fire protection water plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until fire protection water plans are approved. 4. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site. FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1. Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications, and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans • A & B 33 FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private • roads, drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Standard 5-1. 1. Location of Access: All portions of the structures lst story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions. 2. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26 feet. b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24 feet. c. The minimum outside turn radius shall be 50 feet. d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45 feet. e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches. f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12 percent. i. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW). • j. Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 3. Access Doorways: Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows: a. In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards. b. In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways. When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required openings. 4. Access Walkways: Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings. 5. Building Access: Knox boxes for site and building access are required in accordance with RCFPD Standard 5-9. 6. Commercial/Industrial Gates: Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire District Standard. The following design requirements apply: • 2 A & B 34 a. Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval. Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final • acceptance must be requested from FCS. b. Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward. c. Gates may be motorized or manual. d. When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet. e. Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock. The lock must be purchased at the Fire Administration Office. f. .Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second. g. The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and a fail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction. h. Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch. The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location. i. For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. j. If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation. Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations. • 7. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. 8. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. 9. Roof Access: must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard 5-6. There shall be a means of fire department access from the exterior walls of the buildings on to the roofs of all commercial, industrial and multi-family residential structures with roofs less than 75 feet above the level of the fire access road. a. This access must be reachable by either fire department ground ladders or by an aerial ladder. • b. A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access. c. The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the building size and configuration. d. Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard. • e. Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is required. 3 A & B 35 f. Multiple access ladders may be required for larger buildings. g. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard Appendix A. • h. A site plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check. i. Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s). FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit; field inspection is required prior to permit issuance. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. • Compressed Gases . • Dry Cleaning Plants • Repair Garages • Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures • Flammable & combustible liquids FSC-12 Hazardous Materials - Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2010 • California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD50and other implemented and/or adopted standards. FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District #85-1 or#88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS — Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards. The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. 2. All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan • showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the 4 A & B36 • Fire District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure • Standard. 4. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 5. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. 6. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION — Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of • Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power). 5. Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards by Fire Construction Services. 6. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire • access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. 5 A & B 37 7. Address: Must be in accordance with the RCFPD Standard 5-7, 5-8 and/or 5-5. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address in accordance to the appropriate RCFPD addressing • Standard. 8. Hazardous Materials: The applicant must obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services. 9. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 10. Mapping Site Plan: Must be in accordance with the RCFPD Standard 5-11. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 Y" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard shalLbe revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. • • 6 A & B 38 RESOLUTION NO.12-38 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2012-00182, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A SALES AND LEASING FACILITY FOR HEAVY EQUIPMENT ON 2.75 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT(SUBAREA 8), LOCATED AT 13073 ARROW ROUTE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 0229-141-06 AND 07. A. Recitals. 1. Charlie Buquet, on behalf of Cal S&S LLC, filed an application for the approval of Development Review No. DRC2012-00182, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 22nd day of August 2012, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a public hearing on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: • 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced .meeting on August 22, 2012, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located between Pecan Avenue and Hickory Avenue on the south side of Arrow Route, with a street frontage of approximately 542 feet and a lot depth of approximately 280 feet, and is presently an unimproved vacant lot; and b. The property to the north of the subject site, is undeveloped land used as a pipe storage yard with Southern California Edison power lines on it and is zoned Low Medium Residential and Open Space;the property to the south, is developed with a trucking firm and an industrial office building and is zoned General Industrial (Subarea 8) and; the property to the east across Pecan Avenue, is developed with a legal, non-conforming single-family residence and is zoned General Industrial (Subarea 8); and the property to the west, is the Etiwanda Creek, and west of that is undeveloped vacant land and is zoned General Industrial (Subarea 8); and c. The project consists of the construction of a sale and leasing facility with a sales lot and 6,000 square foot two-story, concrete tilt-up office building. The project will be constructed in phases. The majority of the project will be constructed in Phase One such as most on-site improvements and the street improvements on Pecan Avenue. In Phase Two, the applicant is requesting to install the street improvements on Arrow Route, and in Phase Three, construct the • office building; and A & B 39 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-38 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2012-00182— CHARLIE BUQUET August 22, 2012 Page 2 d. The project conforms to the basic Development Standards of the Development • Code which requires conformance with the height, setback, and parking regulations of the zoning district. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan by encouraging uses that are compatible with the surrounding uses and activities that do not have a negative impact on the surrounding area; and b. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located by providing a mix of landscape and security fencing to mitigate the impacts of the outdoor operations and still adhering to setback and height regulations that govern the area where this business will be conducted; and c. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code in that the use requires a Conditional Use Permit to be processed in conjunction with this Development Review for the construction of the sales and leasing facility within the Industrial Zoned Districts; and d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or • improvements in the vicinity as wrought iron fencing, landscaping, and street improvements have been proposed to minimize any impacts on the surrounding area. 4. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under the Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In-Fill Development) because the applicant is proposing to construct a building and parking lot in an area and meets all the criteria for this exemption in the 2012 CEQA Guidelines. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the construction of a sales and leasing facility with a sales lot and 6,000 square foot concrete tilt-up office building at 13073 Arrow Route -APN: 0229-141-06 and 07. • 2) Outdoor storage of items on the property was not reviewed. Any future outdoor storage other than vehicles parking in the parking lot and • sales, lot is not allowed. A & B 40 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-38 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2012-00182 — CHARLIE BUQUET August 22, 2012 Page 3 • 3) No exterior changes to the design of the project, including exterior materials, shall be permitted without prior City review and approval. 4) Maintenance of vehicles on the property was not reviewed and is not allowed without prior approval from the Planning Department. 5) Final phasing of the project shall be started within 4 years from the approval of this application or it will be brought back to the Planning Commission for review and possible revocation of Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-00181. 6) Wrecked or inoperable tractors shall not be stored on the site. 7) Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 8) The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times, and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 9) Free-standing light standards shall not exceed 25 feet or the height of the shortest on-site building. All lighting shall be shielded to confine the light spread to within the site's boundaries. Engineering Department • 1) Processing of a lot merger to combine the separate parcels into one is recommended, prior to Building Permit issuance. 2) Arrow Route frontage improvements shall be widened in accordance with City "Major Arterial" standards including, but not limited to: a) Curb and gutter 36 feet south of the street centerline, asphalt pavement to centerline of the street, curvilinear sidewalk, 9500- lumen HPSV streetlights, street trees, traffic striping and signage • and drainage facilities as determined necessary. Install rip-rap erosion control at the west property line. b) Install pavement transitions within the existing right-of-way, both east and west of the project site, with asphalt curbs to contain street run-off. c) Street trees per Street Tree form. d) The widening of the street at the existing culvert at the northwest corner of the applicants site is not the responsibility of the applicant and is anticipated to be part of a future City project. The applicant's street plans for Arrow Route must be completed prior to the issuance of any permits by the Building and Safety Department. In anticipation of a City project for the resurfacing of Arrow Route, • should a phasing plan be approved for Arrow Route, the applicant's phasing plan shall incorporate all utility connections in Arrow Route, interim drainage, and street improvements with the proposed final City A & B 41 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-38 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2012-00182 — CHARLIE BUQUET August 22, 2012 Page 4 street resurfacing project. The completion of all street improvements, • regardless of City completion, shall be the responsibility of the applicant no later than 4 years from the date of this approval, or prior to final occupancy of the Building Permit at the site, whichever comes first. 3) Installing frontage improvements on Arrow Route will concentrate the flows in the gutter that discharges to the property to the west. This will need to be mitigated on-site or within the existing right-of-way to the west. 4) On-site mitigation facilities are subject to the approval of the Building Official. Any alternate proposals to drain to a public facility are subject to City approval. 5) Pecan Avenue public frontage improvements shall be installed in accordance with the City "Industrial" Standards including, but not limited to: a) Install curb and gutter at 22 feet from the street centerline, street pavement to centerline of street, property line adjacent sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, traffic signing and striping, and street trees. b) All driveways shall be in accordance with the City Driveway • Policy. c) Street trees per Street Tree form. All street improvements shall be installed, completed, and accepted by the City prior to the start of operation of Phase One. 6) An irrevocable offer of dedication shall be made for the Master Plan Storm Drain facilities to replace the Etiwanda Creek Channel. Ultimately, we need a 25-foot wide storm drain easement, but the construction easement shall encompass the entire channel area. 7) Development is within Area 10 of the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Drainage Policy. Developments of less than 5 acres are not required to construct the storm drain facilities specified for Area 10 developments. Instead, they shall pay the Master Plan Drainage Fee. Area 10 developments of less than 5 acres shall show they are protected from possible flooding and, if necessary, construct any and all interim and ultimate facilities needed to protect themselves. 8) The subject site is currently located entirely within an area of special flood hazard. Your construction project shall comply with the requirements of Ordinance 757. 9) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except • for the 66 kV electrical) on the opposite side of Pecan Avenue, shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of Building Permits. The fee shall A & B 42 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-38 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2012-00182 — CHARLIE BUQUET August 22, 2012 Page 5 • be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the Pecan Avenue frontage from the north to the south project boundary. 10) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) on the opposite side of Arrow Route shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of Building Permits. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the Arrow Route frontage from the west to the east project boundary. Building and Safety (Grading): 1) Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices.The Grading and Drainage Plan(s)shall be in substantial conformance with the approved Conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2) A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at Grading and Drainage Plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3) A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or • Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4) The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 5) A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 6) The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures, and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 7) If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8) A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and • Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. A & B 43 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-38 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2012-00182—CHARLIE BUQUET August 22, 2012 Page 6 9) It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off- • site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 10) It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off- site drainage acceptance letter(s)from adjacent downstream property owner(s) or discharge flows in a natural condition (concentrated flows are not accepted) and shall provide the Building and Safety Official a drainage study showing that the proposed flows do not exceed the existing flows prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 11) It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s)to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed off-set from the property line. 12) The Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right-of-way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 13) The Grading and Drainage Plan shall Implement City Standards for on- site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not • covered by City Standard Drawings. 14) All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot off-set from the public right-of-way or adjacent private property. 15) Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 16) The maximum parking stall gradient is 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the current adopted California Building Code. 17) Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. 18) The final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100 feet beyond project boundary. 19) The applicant shall provide a Grading Agreement and Grading Bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 20) This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the • current adopted California Building Code. A & B 44 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-38 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2012-00182 — CHARLIE BUQUET August 22, 2012 Page 7 • 21) The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 22) Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations, the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative,the grading contractor, and the Building Inspector to discuss the grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the Grading Permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the Building Permit; • iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; and iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 23) Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the Engineer of Record shall certify the functionality of the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Best Management Practices (BMP) devices. 24) The Water Quality Management Plan shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 25) Please note that at this conceptual level a review of the accessibility access is not performed. It is the responsibility of the applicant to meet all accessibility requirements. • 26) Please note that a conceptual Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Best Management Practices (BMP) exhibit was not provided A & B 45 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-38 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2012-00182 — CHARLIE BUQUET August 22, 2012 Page 8 for consideration by the Design Review Committee or the Planning • Commission. SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1) The applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Services Director prior to issuance of the Grading Permit for any underground Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Best Management Practices (BMPs). 2) Any affected utility purveyors (including but not limited to Southern California Edison) shall approve all plans that impact their easement, including- utilities, storm drain, slopes, and street trees, and landscaping prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. A note shall be included on all pertinent plans requiring the affected utility company to be notified two working days prior to starting any work in the vicinity of their easement. 3) The applicant shall obtain written comments from any affected utility purveyors including, but not limited to, Southern California Edison regarding site design restrictions within their easement and provide a copy of said comments to the Building and Safety Services Director for review. 4) Prior to removing fences or walls along common-lot lines, and prior to • constructing walls along common lot lines, the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 5) Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall provide to the Building and Safety Services Director, a copy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan for review prior to recordation of the document. The Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be recorded prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. 6) The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 7) A Waste Discharge Identification Number(WDID) shall be provided on the title sheet of the Grading Plan prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 8) Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit a soils report shall be • provided with soil percolation recommendations for the underground infiltration chambers. A & B 46 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-38 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2012-00182 — CHARLIE BUQUET August 22, 2012 Page 9 • 9) Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit, the applicant shall obtain a recorded drainage easement from the downstream property owners accepting concentrated drainage flows. This is specifically for major storm event flows at the common driveway at the southwest corner of the site. Should the adjacent property owner deny an easement accepting storm water drainage flows, said storm water shall be discharged to the adjacent creek with drainage structures meeting applicable flood control requirements. 10) A Grading Bond will be required to be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Director for review and approval prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. • 11) All roof drainage flowing to-the public right-of-way (Pecan Avenue) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. 12) Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall record.an easement and agreement with the adjacent property to accept private sewage disposal for the subject property. 13) Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall submit a copy of the previously approved private sewage disposal permit and associated plans along with calculations showing that the existing • private sewage disposal system on the adjacent southerly property can accommodate the projected sewage flows from the subject property: Included in this review will be a set of plumbing plans showing all fixtures. WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN 1) A Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 2) An updated Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) was not provided for review by the Building and Safety Services Department. The following comments are from the April 2012 review of the WQMP document. 3) The Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Goodman and Associates dated April 2012 has been reviewed and deemed "Incomplete" dated April 24, 2012. The following corrections are required prior to the final approval of the WQMP: Page Section Item • 4.1.1 For the underground infiltration units, please add a note similar to the following: All underground chambers shall be inspected by the owner on a biennial basis with a report given to the City of Rancho A & B 47 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-38 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2012-00182 — CHARLIE BUQUET August.22, 2012 Page 10 Page Section Item • Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager.The owner shall pay for all costs associated with the inspection and report preparation." 4.1.1 Please include all the proposed BMPs including the pavers. 4.1.1 Provide an inspection and maintenance schedule that can be followed by the operator of the facility and can be reviewed by City of Rancho Cucamonga staff on the required biennial inspections. This inspection and maintenance schedule must also be shown on the WQMP BMP exhibit. A blank log is not acceptable. 4.1.2 Include the manufacturer's specific recommendations for inspection and maintenance for the"Infiltration Units"in the section.The City of Rancho Cucamonga is required to provide inspections on the site on a biennial basis; therefore, specific inspection directives are required. 4.3 Please include the title of the person working for the entity responsible for the BMP Operation and Maintenance. 5.1 Please include the required contact information(including the title of the • individual) of the entity responsible for the BMP funding. Include the name, title, address, and telephone number. This is to assist the City staff as personnel changes occur in the future. WQMP BMP exhibits: please include the maintenance requirements and inspection schedule. I n addition, provide a detail for each BMP for facilitate the City's required biennial inspections. • 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF AUGUST, 2012. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Frances Howdyshell, Chairman ATTEST: Jeffrey A. Bloom, Secretary I, Jeffrey A. Bloom, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of August 2012, by the following vote-to-wit: • A & B 48 • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-38 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2012-00182 — CHARLIE BUQUET August 22, 2012 Page 11 • AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • • A & B 49 „ ;, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ilio DEPARTMENT 5:e.. .a STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2012-00181 AND DRC2012-00182 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICANT: CHARLIE BUQUET LOCATION: 13073 ARROW ROUTE —APN: 0229-141-06 AND 07. ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements Completion Date • 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative,to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 12-37 and 12-38, / /_ Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans(full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The / /_ project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Notice of Exemption - $50 X B. Time Limits 1. Conditional Use Permit and Development/Design Review approvals shall expire if building / /_ permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. • 1 A & B50 Project No DRC2012-00181 and DRC2012-00182 Completion Date C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/_ • site plans, architectural elevations,exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program,and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions / /_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and / /_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for / /_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.)or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 5. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code,all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 6. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved / /_ by the Planning Director and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 7. Trash receptacle(s)are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and / /_ • the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 8. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be _/ / located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 9. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, / / including proper illumination. D. Building Design 1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or / /_ projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 2 • A & B 51 Project No DRC2012-OD1B1 and DRC2012-00182 Comofetion Date 2. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main / / building colors. --- • Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long When a side of any parking space abuts / /_ a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide. 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall / / contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, / / and exits shall be striped per City standards. --- 4. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the Planning Director, City Engineer, and / /_ Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 5. Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more / /_ parking stalls. Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped. 6. Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more / /_ parking stalls. Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent. The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet. F. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _/_/ • the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 percent _/ / within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees -24-inch box or larger. 3. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking / / stalls. —— 4. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one / / tree per 30 linear feet of building. --- 5. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water / /_ efficient landscaping as defined in Ordinance 823 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code G. Signs 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. / /_ Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. • 3 A & B 52 Project No. DRC2012-00181 and DRC2012-00182 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909)477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) • H. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: / / a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans(2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams,water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number(i.e., DRC2012-00181 and DRC2012-00182)clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. /_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wer' signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers'Compensation coverage to _/ /_ the City prior to permit issuance. • 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. / / 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the / /_ Building and Safety Department. I. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be / /_ marked with the project file number(i.e., DRC2012-00181 and DRC2012-00182). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes,ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or / /_ major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permits issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map / /_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. 4 • A & B 53 Project No. DRC2012-00181 and DRC2D12-00182 Completion Date 4 For projects using septic tank facilities, written certification of acceptability, including all /_/_ supportive information, shall be obtained from the San Bernardino County Department of Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic Tank IIIPermits, and prior to issuance of building permits. 5 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday / /_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 6. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public / / counter). ——— J. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances / / considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. --- 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. _/_/_ 3. Provide draft stops in attic areas. / / 4. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A / / 5. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A. / / 6. Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. _/_/_ K. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code,City Grading _/ /_ Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. • 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by-the State of California to / /_ perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the / / time of application for grading plan check. --- 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, /_/_ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building _ permits. 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for / /_ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer. • 5 A & B 54 Project No DRC2012-00181 and DRC2012-00162 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT,(909)477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L. Dedication and Vehicular Access • 1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, _/_/_ community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas,street trees,traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 2 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets(measured from / / street centerline): ——50 feet total feet on Arrow Route / / 33 feet total feet on Pecan Avenue / / 3. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. / / 4. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or / / noted on the final map. --M. Street Improvements 1. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source / /_ of energy,fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and • maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 2. - Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: / / Curb& A.C. Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail Other Arrow Route X X X n/a X X n/a n/a n/a Pecan Avenue X X X X X X n/a n/a n/a Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item (e) modify existing for local street connection (f) maintain existing LMD area until the project is approved/accepted by the City. 3. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights / /_ on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. 6 • A & B 55 Project No DRC2012-00181 and DRC2012-00182 Completion Date b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a / /_ construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required • c. Pavement striping, marking,traffic signing, street name signing,traffic signal conduit,and / /_ interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City / / Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. e. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with / /_ adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving,which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 4 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in / / accordance with the City's street tree program. 5. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed / /_ legend (box below) and construction notes- shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet (typically sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The Engineering Services Department reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Qty. Arrow Route Lagerstoemia Crape Myrtle Hybrid 3' 20' 24" Fill • indica tuscarr Pink O.C. Box In Pecan Avenue Tristaniopsis Water Gum 3' 25' 15 Gal Fill laurina O.C. In Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. N. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting / /_ Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. • 7 A & B 56 Project No. DRC2012-00181 and DRC2012-00182 • Completion Date O. Drainage and Flood Control 1. The project(or portions thereof)is located within a Flood Hazard Zone;therefore,flood protection / /_• measures shall be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer P. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system,water, gas, / /_ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. / /_ 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the / /_ Cucamonga Valley Water District(CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District,and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits,whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. Q. General Requirements and Approvals 1. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage _/_/ Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 2. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all /_/_ new street lights for the first 6 months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building • permit issuance if no map is involved. 3. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees / /_ shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first Building Permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: R. Security Lighting 1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. / /_ These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. 2. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings,with / / direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. 3. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. / / • 8 • A & B 57 Protect No DRC2012-00181 and DRC2012-00182 • Completion Date S. Security Fencing 1. All businesses or residential communities with security fencing and gates will provide the police _/_/_ • with a keypad access and a unique code. The initial code is to be submitted to the Police Crime Prevention Unit along with plans If this code is changed due to a change in personnel or for any other reason, the new code must be supplied to the Police via the 24-hour dispatch center at (909) 941-1488 or by contacting the Crime Prevention Unit at(909)477-2800 extension 2474 or extension 2475 T. Windows 1. Security glazing is recommended on storefront windows to resist window smashes and impede / / entry to burglars. U. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime / / visibility. V. Alarm Systems 1. Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed. Instructing management and / /_ employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in turn save dollars and lives. 2. Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriffs dispatch number: (909) 941-1488. / / APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION EiANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING NDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • 9 A & B58 q Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection • District FIRE Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS May 1, 2012 Heavy Equipment Sales & Leasing 13027 Arrow DRC2012-00181 & 182 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT The project must comply in design and constructed in accordance with the 2010 California Building & Fire Codes, the RCFPD Ordinance FD50 and the RCFPD Standards. The RCFPD ordinance, procedures & standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web www.cityofrc.us FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply Reference the RCFPD Standard 5-10 FSC-2 Fire Flow • 1. The required minimum fire flow for this project, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed is 1500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoring. This requirement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 2. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 3. Fire protection water plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until fire protection water plans are approved. 4. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site. FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1. Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications, and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. • A & B 59 FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private • roads, drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Standard 5-1. 1. Location of Access: All portions of the structures 1s` story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions. 2. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26 feet. b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24 feet. c. The minimum outside turn radius shall be 50 feet. d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45 feet. e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches. f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12 percent. • i. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW). j. Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 3. Access Doorways: Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows: a. In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards. b. In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways. When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required openings. 4. Access Walkways: Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings. 5. Building Access: Knox boxes for site and building access are required in accordance with RCFPD Standard 5-9. 6. Commercial/Industrial Gates: Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire District Standard. The following design requirements apply: • 2 A & B 60 • a. Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval. Upon the completion of • the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS. b. Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward. c. Gates may be motorized or manual. d. When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet. e. Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock. The lock must be purchased at the Fire Administration Office. f. .Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second. g. The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and a fail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction. h. Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch. The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location. i. For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. j. If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation. Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations. • 7. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes, A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. 8. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. 9. Roof Access: must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard 5-6. There shall be a means of fire department access from the exterior walls of the buildings on to the roofs of all commercial, industrial and multi-family residential structures with roofs less than 75 feet above the level of the fire access road. a. This access must be reachable by either fire department ground ladders or by an aerial ladder. b. A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access. c. The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the building size and configuration. d. Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard. • e. Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is required. 3 A & B 61 f. Multiple access ladders may be required for larger buildings. g. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard Appendix A. • h. A site plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check. i. Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s). FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit; field inspection is required prior to permit issuance. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. • Compressed Gases • Dry Cleaning Plants • Repair Garages • Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures • Flammable & combustible liquids FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of • equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2010 California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD50and other implemented and/or adopted standards. FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District#85-1 or#88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS — Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards. The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. 2. All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan • showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the 4 A & B 62 Fire District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure • Standard. 4. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 5. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. 6. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services"Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION — Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of • Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power). 5. Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards by Fire Construction Services. 6. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire • access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. 5 A & B63 7. Address: Must be in accordance with the RCFPD Standard 5-7, 5-8 and/or 5-5. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address in accordance to the appropriate RCFPD addressing • Standard. 8. Hazardous Materials: The applicant must obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services. 9. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 10. Mapping Site Plan: Must be in accordance with the RCFPD Standard 5-11. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 '%" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with_RCFPD Standard shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. • • 6 A & B 64 • STAFF REPORT 1 1st • PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: August 22, 2012 RANCHO TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CUCAMONGA FROM: Jeffrey A. Bloom, Interim Planning Director BY: Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TRAIL ABANDONMENT - DRC2009-00848 — DAVID FAJARDO - A request to abandon two portions of a trail that leads from the trail between residences onto Ranch Gate Road in the Very Low (VL) Residential District. The two portions of trail are between 5272 and 5278 Ranch Gate Road and one completely on 5340 Ranch Gate Road - APN: 1061-021-02; 1061-021-03; 1061-031-04. This project is categorically exempt from the requirement of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15305 (Class 5 exemption - Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Trail Abandonment DRC2009-00848 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions. BACKGROUND: At the November 10, 2010 Planning Commission Meeting the Commission requested that staff review the concerns about how much the trail would cost to improve to the San • Bernardino County Flood Control District standards. The residents were concerned that this could be an open ended expenditure. They were unsure about taking on this burden when they did not know the actual cost of the improvements. Since that meeting the Engineering Services Department has been in contact with the San Bernardino County Flood Control District in an effort to determine the cost. After filing for a permit, the Flood Control District requested the following: • The existing Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Flood Control District be amended to include the segment of affected trail. • Bring the trail segment up to Flood Control Standards by installing step-throughs with other improvements at three access points and grading of the area around these points to minimize any hazard to the public. • The City of Rancho Cucamonga needs to obtain written approval to use the trail portion owned by Southern California Edison. • Improve the Community Trail to Flood Control Standards south of Gate 1A as its current condition creates a hazard for pedestrians and/or equestrians. • Provide a chain link fence along the west end of the Community Trail in order to prevent unauthorized access. • Amend the existing trail agreement to include this segment and set forth operational and maintenance responsibilities of both agencies necessary for the equestrian trail at this location. The City's Engineering Services Department determined the estimated cost of all these requirements • is over $107,832.00. This was much more than was expected. Staff then brought the project back to the Trails Committee and staff recommended that the Committee rescind their recommendation to require the applicant to obtain the necessary permits and approvals from the San Bernardino County ITEM C • PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2009-00848—TRAIL ABANDONMENT- DAVID FAJARDO August 22, 2012 Page 2 • Flood Control District to remove the gate at the north end of the trail and replace it with a step-through for pedestrian and equestrian access. GENERAL: A. Trails Advisory Committee: The Trails Committee (Howdyshell, Munoz, Ryerson, Oaxaca, Tisler, Henderson, and Douglass) reviewed the site plan and photos of the site on January 13, 2010. They recommended that the applicant obtain the necessary permits and approvals from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District to remove the gate at the north end of the trail and replace it with a step-through for pedestrian and equestrian access. Following recommendation from Staff on May 9, 2012, the Trails Committee (Howdyshell, Munoz, Ryerson, Pallotto, Tisler, Bumett, Henderson, and Douglass) reconsidered and agreed to rescind their previous recommendation of requiring the applicant to make improvements and obtain all permits from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District to utilize the flood control corridor to connect the trail so it does not dead end. Instead, they recommended approval of the vacation of the two trail legs with the condition that the north/south trail behind the properties in Tract 9426 be restored and maintained in a usable condition. The homeowners that were present at the meeting indicated their agreement to the proposed condition. B. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) • and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under as a Class 5 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15305 Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations because this project meets all the criteria described in the section and is only an abandonment of a portions of an equestrian trail easement and there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within Tract 9426. Respectfully submitted, J- re A. Bloom Interim Planning Director JAB:SF/dl Attachments: Exhibit A - Tract Map 9426 Exhibit B - Planning Commission minutes dated November 10, 2010 Exhibit C - Planning Commission Staff Report dated November 10, 2010 Draft Resolution of Approval for Trail Abandonment DRC2009-00848 Draft Resolution of Approval for Trail Abandonment DRC2009-00848 for City Council • C-2 :i l0., PN1 E906$7e/4EG CA• 6irf5itlr o �i1/57 0A gYtvr gO• .)• s/ • 062!1 ?9- If80 APA/ /06/-02/-02 ‘1A2i f JT,J C o4/ - 491.7 AAiV/06/-02/- l 3 AA/Psi/ 4 09},x/ 9 '4 -1.fT/5" • ANN /%/-043/- 04 V/D lgAXf// FA/4,409-tore SGaL.E.. I •1m •MEE:T 2. of TRACT N 2 9426 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL/FORAN4 211114 A SO201715,04 OP I.0•S2Tl4N OF LOTS i0,41.04.10 It.bLOLK 25.OPTNL C4C*N0N4q IOMLOTEAD Atc0C4T1aL AS OLGOt040 IN 2OO4 4, 0000 44,0aN 0,002420,00 C...0111./TT SFLOROS 4 �+:.. «a" J•M.WIISON,CIVIL E}(GI EER M," ,4 APRIL,197 '1 " 1- ��: N!O•'0 i±'G)! Igo N.. ""'.....14Z1.0,4 e,.s .INN .�.� a=,4 4,'20- S l,..0 T 5 U <�IPED wf a. 3' L7 as.020 AS 1U t. I1 P 52 . .•,°I I A ,1'r 1 51tE� I0 T N _�dlLa(�b �_ LwT°r . ' fRO Ofe/o.V*DOA es LI got I- -- ' wwR•.• • MO/1 r e /E!aR 9s0•j<.0. Yzt 1.11200 ^:"` G -1.e • •._ I :,d, �.•¢p. 'l y -i r r,. ..,n-rill ia "`` {D D e a,1. 14 k D. J J O m•cf"-n7l x20,",,, I: )5e y PAW'ra1• :, to .0 4 it i ". '...x+ 47) SCALE 1".IDe' . 1 ",..yfr;t 4 Z J J Q.;, 615 f .a.,� y T N M• W L, AI( al 7,5 L.iwydA 7zhvL ri• 5320; .. <A ✓.. 1 � _ a . _* e 8 5}h ! .1i•a t .. 'Gi ' ©0' .0 J &.r is Y 016 -_ C n 41 f c.•a l j f� i wA i I •w 1 11} "Y f • CURVE DATA t , 4, p •. ` u4wu'.r.. .a, !' 3 O 2'0. 14. 2000.0 S).2f +.COTES: . I...'., 1 OO y'�' So' +0. 4•.4 1- • INDICATES NYNO NMYNENT 70.0440-04741.4.1.•MK 'Z.::0rn " 1 .x ; t t.0 p!/� '•0.1 fP WOO 2.14 G4.0(7,12 At NITER a 1'1. i . •.-. 'c •4. ./' ♦) or'a SS lasso 41.11 2.0 INDICATES SET IY.,I.P.TA44E0•RCE ITT.',N.•NLO0 .' . ass,. 1 Q © 151'S. 10' co. 1.85.00 FLUID 500004E II 00010•1244. N 111 ail' !,, © 1! .0 4T' 4022 {1.10 2 2.T'REDWOOD mac I4•ate 0014TErt00)sal-AT All 1 ¢ T �•�� i 1.f�Ol '''S 2<' 40.00 DT.tr 6641 SOT C/R11ERS AN0 TA0440•RCEIT100;SET.Lb4D 1 T,''. i4/ O '1r 57 11' ,05.01 141ST 000 TAG IN TOPS!SYQp o0 22040 PWLICT150 06444 i•'gl r) N 4S • I '.0• l WT 4024. ,,1 Y . 4 TNt•.TQACT WAS 14 LOTS 1:".i IL, I \3 \•`,. .. \ - S TILL btW0114S 5.040 NELEON 0LE b0.4E0 0000 Txt 4 uu•?,.1 OF 4144410t 1060 50,00'N.411 It'40•E'AS a •' .10•..•■1.4. $tom . 500414 ON Tr.:NO2,N.6.124/11. • t a. _-e • ( 4.64.4.DetIOTES 20110104 SETBACK LI4L,SNn00 TOIlS.<D�-1'0' 4,al0. ¶42 % 1 1.A 50114 020001 4/AS 02662,20.0 2y RIULA0D MILLS 0t42004TLS c?''.. '•\'N 2, 2 • 1 _n 1 \ WTE04tft 15,1116.104ED lY Lbu40004JSLE 24611 ,„..%-:-. a fl ; X11 • 2 C.S...01400G5 COUNTY S ENE12R4 .ION GOOK. .A` '� _ J .rn� 7.C.S.N. ntrNOTES C0I4ry fUWRwaS 0mxu.lE 4T 0L t s ' • 1.4.1 VP. i c G1TL I D� 'au( R �sT�Ala A� AT :;4;11, NN -a Y1� EXHIBIT A 5, g 11/1 /ir hvii- /l/5 T •: ,(�3 _ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES • Regular Meeting November 10, 2010 Chairman Munoz called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 7:08 p.m. The meeting was held in the Council Chambers at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Richard Fletcher, Frances Howdyshell, Lou Munoz, Francisco Oaxaca, ABSENT: Ray Wimberly SSTAFF PRESENT: Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney; Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner; Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer; Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planner; Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary; Mike Smith, Associate Planner; James Troyer, Planning Director; Tabe Van der Zwaag,Associate Planner r, ewe ANNOUNCEMENTS • No announcements were made at this time. • 4 k k F APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion: Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Oaxaca, carried 4-0-1 (Wimberly absent),to approve the minutes of October 27, 2010. CONSENT CALENDAR A. RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL FOR VARIANCE DRC2009-00863 - PETE BABCOCK - Approval of the resolution prepared at the direction of the Planning Commission at their meeting of October 27, 2010, granting the Variance request for a storage structure built without a permit, located within the Very Low Residential District at 5753 Indigo Avenue -APN: 1043-121-10. The project consists of reducing the required side yard setback by 5 feet and qualifies as a Class 5 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15305. Motion: Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Howdyshell, to adopt the Resolution of Approval for Variance DRC2009-00863 as presented by staff. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, OAXACA NOES: NONE ABSENT: WIMBERLY - carried • EXHIBIT B C-4 PUBLIC HEARINGS Chairman Munoz abstained from hearing Items B and C because of a possible conflict of interest as • he is employed in the communications industry. He left the Council Chambers at 7:10 p.m. B. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2009-00762 - T-MOBILE WEST CORPORATION - A request to increase the height of a free standing cross tower from 40.5 feet to 50.5 feet in order to add a second wireless communication facility (collocate) for a site located adjacent to an existing church at the northwest corner of 19th Street and Beryl Street in the Medium (M) Residential District at 9090 19th Street -APN: 0201-221-08. Planning Department staff has determined that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines as a Class 3(CEQA Guidelines Section 15303)exemption which covers the installation of small new equipment and facilities in small structures. Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Commissioner Fletcher asked-how many carriers are on the cross now and what controls does the City have in place regarding the height limits. Mr. van der Zwaag said this is the second carrier and in order for it to operate properly, height needs to be added for a separation between each. He said the next carrier would also have to come before the Commission to ask for more height. He said the Commission can state what they believe is too high. Vice Chairman Howdyshell asked if there is a standard for height limits. Mr. van der Zwaag responded that is true. • Commissioner Fletcher asked if we are restricted by State regulations in making these determinations. Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney, said this would not occur under State regulations but theoretically under Federal law. He said they cannot prevent a carrier from filling a gap in their local coverage. He said if the City prevented a carrier from doing this because of a height limit, then it could possibly apply, but this is not the case with this application and he could not recall a case where it did happen. Vice Chairman Howdyshell invited the applicant to comment. Aaron Anderson, representing T-Mobile, One Venture, Suite 200, Irvine, said they need to fill the gap in coverage in the area and to cover the 210 Freeway. He said they worked with staff on the aesthetics to blend with the surrounding area. He said a 10 foot separation is to avoid interference with other carriers. He explained that the cross is made of an FRP material and transmissions can penetrate this material. Vice Chairman Howdyshell was glad to see that it is not just a plain tower seen from the freeway. She opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no comment, she closed the public hearing. • Planning Commission Minutes -2- November 10, 2010 C-5 Motion: Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Oaxaca, (3-0-1-1)to adopt the Resolution of Approval for DRC2009-00762 as presented by staff. Motion carried by the following vote: • AYES: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, OAXACA • NOES: NONE ABSENT: WIMBERLY ABSTAIN: MUNOZ - carried C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2010-00686 - AT&T - Collocation of a Wireless Communications Facility consisting of 12 antennas and 1 microwave dish on an existing 60 foot monopine wireless communications facility in the Hillside Residential District, located at City Fire Station #175, 11108 Banyan Street - APN: 0201-191-28. This project is categorically exempt from the requirement of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA guidelines Section 15301 (Class 1 Exemption - Existing Facilities)_ Jennifer Nakamura,Associate Planner, presented the staff report. She reported that she received a fax from one neighbor about a perceived hazard from electrical radiation. She said staff responded to their concern and explained that the FCC governs these standards and the carriers must operate within those set standards. She said the FCC determines the acceptable levels. Vice Chairman Howdyshell invited the applicant to comment. Beth Broussard, Trillium Consulting, 5912 Bolsa Avenue, Suite 202, Huntington Beach. She said they try to keep the aesthetics as is in that they are not increasing the height and their enclosure is • similar to the existing one. Vice Chairman Howdyshell opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no comment,she closed the public hearing. Motion: Moved by Oaxaca, seconded by Fletcher(3-0-1-1), to adopt the Resolution of Approval for DRC2010-000686 as presented by staff. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, OAXACA NOES: NONE ABSENT: WIMBERLY ABSTAIN: MUNOZ - carried Chairman Munoz returned to the Council Chambers at 7:23 p.m. • 1 l Ye k D. NON-CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2010-00728-ELIAS MEDINA ON BEHALF OF ZENDEJAS MEXICAN GRILL AND SPIRITS -A request to provide a full service restaurant and bar with entertainment in the Industrial Park District(Subarea 7),located at 8106 Milliken Avenue - APN: 0229-012-57. Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Class 1 Exemption - Existing Facilities). Related File: Entertainment Permit DRC2010-00729. • Planning Commission Minutes -3- November 10, 2010 C-6 E. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2010-00729-ELIAS MEDINA ON BEHALF OF ZENDEJAS MEXICAN GRILL AND SPIRITS -A request to provide entertainment in conjunction with the operation of a full service restaurant with a bar in the Industrial Park District(Subarea 7)located • at 8106 Milliken Avenue. APN 0229-012-57. Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to State CEQA guidelines Section 15301 (Class 1 Exemption - Existing Facilities). Related File: Non-Construction Conditional Use Permit DRC2010-00728. Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. She said staff met with and discussed the perceived issues with the applicants. She said the City of Chino reported that they do not have issues with the Zendejas location in Chino. She said she also contacted the ABC and they do not have any enforcement issues at their Chino location either. Commissioner Fletcher asked for clarification on the entertainment regulations regarding the number of performers. Ms. Nakamura said our code currently allows a solo piano player, or harpist without an Entertainment Permit. Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney noted that Condition #4 on page D & E -25 should be amended to indicate that if the business is sold then the new owner would have to apply for a new Entertainment Permit. Ms. Nakamura agreed the modified condition makes sense. Jose Zendejas, 13932 View Ridge Ct, Chino Hills said his establishment is 100%family dining,with sports on TVs in the bar area and the patio. Chairman Munoz opened the public hearing. • Ed Diet! asked if this is a chain or a family owned restaurant. He asked if the owners are the same as the application that was brought forward 2 months ago. Ms Nakamura said they are the same family, but various family members have each taken their own way. She said they have different restaurants around the Inland Empire. She said the one on Foothill is owned by a relative and operated separately from this one. Chairman Munoz closed the public hearing. Vice Chairman Howdyshell said she is pleased to see this in that it fills a vacant building and creates jobs. She said it is a complete staff report that addressed the previous concerns, the exhibits are precise, there is a good security report, and it is outlined nicely. She complimented the owners for opening the establishment in challenging economic times and she said she hopes the City supports it. Commissioner Oaxaca agreed. He said it is nice to see them expand the family operation, and he has had questions from some residents about when they are opening. He wished them success. Commissioner Fletcher said it is a straightforward request and that he is happy to see someone in this beautiful building. He said he is hopeful it will be a nice dining place with more affordable prices than before. Chairman Munoz agreed. He admonished the applicants to be familiar with this document and to be • sure to understand the conditions. He said if the Entertainment Permit is not adhered to,they could Planning Commission Minutes -4- November 10, 2010 C-7 be brought back before the Commission. He wished them luck and noted that it is an architecturally beautiful building. • • Motion: Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Howdyshell (4-0-1), to adopt the Resolutions of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2010-00728 and Entertainment permit DRC2010-00729 with the amended condition #4. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, OAXACA NOES: NONE ABSENT: WIMBERLY - carried • F. TRAIL ABANDONMENT DRC2009-00848 - A request to abandon two portions of a Local Feeder Trail that lead from the trail between residences onto Ranch Gate Road in the Very Low Residential District. The two portions of trail are between 5272& 5278 Ranch Gate Road and one completely on the south side of 5340 Ranch Gate Road-APN: 1061-021-02; 1061-021-03; 1061-031-04. This project is categorically exempt from the requirement of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15305(Class 5 Exemption - minor alterations in land use limitations). This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report and displayed overhead photos. He said this is the first time all residents approved a vacation of a trail in 30 years. He mentioned one correction on Page F-22. He said the discussion of Exhibit A-should be the resolution and not the map as indicated in the packet. Steven Flower,Assistant City Attorney clarified that Exhibit A would be the attached draft resolution • for Council approval. Commissioner Fletcher asked what the original easements were for because they do not appear to connect with anything. He asked how we built houses on those easements. Mr. Fowler said the homes were built when it was under the County's authority. Commissioner Oaxaca asked if progress has been made towards ironing out any issues with County Flood Control with respect to the improvements and opening the trail exit at the north end of the trail. Mr. Fowler said that is correct. Vice Chairman Howdyshell said that the Trails Advisory Committee (TAC) has an emphasis on connectivity. She said that there are some things with plans in place that are on a 5-6 year plan because of budgets and depending on the level of design needed. She said being on the TAC, linkages are important and the connection with Sapphire was really important. She said this proposal is important in recognizing what is already in place. Chairman Munoz asked who will fund the improvements at the north end. Mr. Fowler responded that the residents will be making a deposit, and the City will construct the improvements. Chairman Munoz invited the applicants to comment. • Planning Commission Minutes -5- November 10, 2010 C-8 Dave Fajarda, 5340 Ranch Gate Road, said this project will help maintain the existing fencing and security and would also open it up for City residents to enjoy the trail and therefore is a win-win for all. • Patricia Jackson said she lives at 5272 Ranch Gate Road at the top of hill. She said she does not accept this proposal. She said she wants the easement closed due to safety concerns and allows people on their property near their front window. She said the open ended dollar amount for the deposit does not give a final amount and opens up liability for the property owners to defend any actions and City costs. Jack Jackson said when he bought the house, 3 other properties were sold,and one was occupied. He said the neighbors knew of this easement and they were told that if it was not used then it would eventually be abandoned. He said he is primarily concerned about safety, canyon access and related parking. He said there are other obstructions in easements such as driveways, telephone, Edison lines, cable etc., in-ground boxes that are not safe for the weight of horses. He said he wanted the extension to Ranch Gate eliminated. He said he wants the liabilities clarified because they were told they would need a million dollar policy for liability. He said the current gravel improvements are not a proper horse trail. He said there is nothing that defines what improvements will be made. He said he would like to know if utility boxes have to be removed and if so, who will remove them. He reiterated that the property is not the big issue; his concerns focus on security, privacy, traffic and costs. Chairman Munoz asked if there is a problem today with people parking in the cul-de-sac. Mr. Jackson said they are not parking on his cul-de-sac but they are parking at the south end of the tract and down into the canyon. He noted the canyon is sometimes used for paintball. He said that most of the traffic is at the bottom of Ranch Gate Road. Mrs. Jackson noted that sometimes people park to the side of their house in the middle of the night • and cars are broken into. Chairman Munoz opened the public hearing. Jim Glascot, 5452 Ranch Gate Road concurred with the Jacksons because there are security issues and there is no need to continue the trail. He said it will cause security risks and it gives a free trail behind their homes opening a liability issue. He said it should remain a dead end. Chairman Munoz asked if they have a trail now. Mr. Glascot said it ends now. He said people walk there now, but because it dead ends,they have to come back down the same way they went up. He said if they open it up, people can drive there and will dump and run. He said he can ride his horse fine the way it is now. Chairman Munoz noted that rails can prevent vehicles from accessing the trail. He asked if he would be opposed to that. Mr. Glascot said he did not oppose that option. Vice Chairman Howdyshell noted that at the Hillside opening there is an opening to the easement with no fencing or rails. Mr. Glascot said it is more like fire break. Vice Chairman Howdyshell said they need a railing so it is not open ended. • Planning Commission Minutes -6- November 10, 2010 C-9 • Mr. Glascot said if they open it up behind those homes, they need some type of blockade because they have had issues already of dumping and this would just make it easierforthem to dump behind • their homes. David Gunther, 5302 Ranch Gate Road,said all of this is true however,there are some walkers and some horses and he knows people dump trash. He said he is against the gateway at the lower end of the trail because everyone now has some form of vehicular/RV access. He said he does not want that access blocked. He said he wants the easements between the homes to stay as they are. He said he did not see how opening the gates to the County Flood Control should cost ten thousand dollars. He said they should leave it all as it is. He said the residents police it themselves. Chairman Munoz closed the public hearing and asked staff to clarify the ten thousand dollar bond. Steve Fowler noted that the ten thousand dollar bond is an Engineering condition. He said this is an initial fee, and it may not cost that but they are not sure of the price for improvements. Dan James, Senior Engineer, said they are not committed to this price. He said the Capital Improvement design team looked at it and they also have had discussions with County Flood Control. He said they are open to opening the trail and from past experience it appears they would only have to remove the chain link fencing and install horse gates. He said this would not be open to vehicles; similar to what is on Turquoise now. He said they feel a minimum amount of work would need to be done but County Flood Control will not consider it until we submit plans. He said this is why the cost is open ended because they could come up with something new. He said staff honestly feels it will be less, but things are uncertain. Chairman Munoz asked about the concern of access for an RV or vehicles. He asked if there is anyway to mitigate this. • Mr. James said that to the south they would need to block off the trail because there will be a horse gate access at the north end. He said there would not be access for outside vehicles but at the south end it could be left as it is now which would still allow those property owners to deliver hay, access RV's, etc.. He added that there is no intent to change the property easement between the neighbors' homes. Vice Chairman Howdyshell asked if there is a timeline for the permit process. Mr. James said from the time of the deposit, they should have a more realistic number in 3 months time. Commissioner Fletcher asked if the proposed action has any ties to bonds. Steve Flower,Assistant City Attorney, said the funds described are not a bond, it is a cash deposit. He said the City has property rights and therefore has the authority to negotiate the conditions on the abandonment/seceding of the property to ensure the City's interests are maintained while giving up the property interests. Commissioner Fletcher asked if the trail to the rear of the homes is a Community Trail and if there would be a problem in gating the south access and giving access to the gate to the property owners. Mr. James said it is private trail and staff would not object to them gating that trail and giving the owners keys. Mr. James explained that he (Mr. Jackson) thought it would be wide open access. Mr. James said there will be pipe gates and posts to let horses through but not vehicles. • Planning Commission Minutes -7- November 10, 2010 C-10 • Commissioner Fletcher asked if they could take action on the abandonment of these two easements and let staff work with them on the other issue of the other trail. Chairman Munoz confirmed that the City will only abandon the easement if there is another • alternative provided to complete the trail. Mr. Flower noted that final action is taken by the City Council and the action of the Commission is to make a recommendation. He said that with respect to the question about the indemnification requirement; standard language was used that is consistent for any application to the City. He said that if the action is challenged and if the applicants want to avoid costs, then they could abandon application. Chairman Munoz clarified that the application is for the vacation of 2 easements and if City deems it necessary to continue north to an existing trail. Commissioner Fletcher stated that these easements have been ignored by everyone and there is not much reason to keep them. He said he favors abandonment. He said there are lots of problems with them and the request should be granted. He said the issue of expense can be hashed out before the Council meeting. Commissioner Oaxaca concurred mostly. He said currently,the easements are largely ignored,and we need to try to fix that; they need to be abandoned. He said with respect to the issues regarding security,we do not want to open a single-lane highway just to control access. He said the residents can maintain their access but not for other full sized vehicles. He said with respect to the costs,the resolution indicates almost signing a blank check although staff assures that it will likely be less. He said he would like to see an intermediate step/lower amount until we get a more concrete estimate to present to the residents. He said he agrees with Mr. Flower in that the City is giving up property rights and so it is reasonable to expect a partnership. He said he would like to see a reasonable • estimate for the residents. Vice Chairman Howdyshell also concurred regarding the abandonment request. She said security is key and agreed that a reasonable estimate is needed. Chairman Munoz said ditto to all. He said he is concerned about the costs to the residents. He agreed with Commissioner Oaxaca regarding the quid pro quo about property rights of the City. He said he is also a member of the Trails Advisory Committee and they represent a large segment of the community. He said equestrians expect access through these trails. He said he did not know that closing the trail down would make the resdients any safer. He said kids are always going up streets and into the canyons. He said the property owners will be dependent on their neighbors and police to help police this. He said he is concerned about their costs and agreed that perhaps they could direct staff to look at interim measures to get a better estimate. He said he fully supports the abandonment request. James Troyer, Planning Director said that the ten thousand dollar figure can be lowered in the resolution, but the Flood Control District costs could be more and if that happens,the project would stop until we got more money on deposit. Chairman Munoz said that once we are in negotiations with Flood Control, the outcome could exceed that amount. Mr. Flower said that if it is lowered to five thousand dollars and then work begins, and the money is exhausted, then the condition of approval would not be met, but ultimately the trail would not be vacated. He said the City could pick up the rest of the costs, but there is no guarantee that the City • will have funds for this. Planning Commission Minutes -8- November 10, 2010 C-11 • Vice Chairman Howdyshell said it is perplexing, as she does not want to give them a blank check. • Commissioner Oaxaca said the homeowners need this to make economic sense. Commissioner Oaxaca said the homeowners would oppose this if the cost is excessive. He said he would like a two step process and ask the City to identify costs to at least cover staffs costs to develop plans for the Flood Control District and then the residents can decide to proceed if the costs are beyond that. Mr. Flower noted that this application complies with the Trail Implementation Plan. He said the plan directed them to first take this to the TAC and then have a public hearing with a recommendation for the Council. He said the Commission can continue the item and ask staff to work on it towards a possible solution. He said there is no time trigger, and no deadline. Chairman Munoz asked if staff needs this recommendation before starting the process or can it be done in lieu of the recommendation to Council. Mr. James said that funding is tight, and this project would not be from general funds. He said the Capital Improvement design group looked at it and they came up with the ten thousand dollar deposit figure. He said he can't authorize funds for staff to do this project without City Council approval. He noted that the Trails Committee meets on the priority level of their projects. He said they could lower the figure, but if it is more then we would have to go back to the residents for more. Chairman Munoz asked it would be feasible to give staff an amount just for staff to look at this. Mr. Flower questioned that it would not meet the condition if that occurred. Mr. James said he did not know what the cost of the permit is but he could arrange for a meeting with the Capital Improvements section head before they make the deposit. He said the intent of the • dollar value is to get a realistic commitment from the property owners. Commissioner Fletcher said the trail improvements are basically in exchange for the easements. He asked about the encroaching utilities on the existing easements. Mr. James noted that some of the utilities appear to be on the public parkway along the curb. Chairman Munoz reopened the public hearing. Vice Chairman Howdyshell asked if there are funds on deposit, they would need to know what the residents are willing to do. She said they would need a collective decision. Mr.Troyer advised the item be continued to the December 8,2010 meeting date because there are too many unresolved issues to go to Council. He suggested we work with the residents and Engineering and contact the Flood Control District regarding their costs. Commissioner Fletcher noted that he did not hear if the residents are concerned about opening the north end of the trail. He said they may still want to block community access to south side. He asked if they could consider a lower dollar amount. Mr. Troyer said that will be part of staffs review. Chairman Munoz concurred and said he wants staff to consider the equestrian community and they need to weigh in. • Motion: Moved by Oaxaca, seconded by Fletcher,to continue the item for the Trail Abandonment DRC2009-00848 to the December 8, 2010 meeting (4-0-1). Motion carried by the following vote: Planning Commission Minutes -9- November 10, 2010 C-12 AYES: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, OAXACA NOES: NONE ABSENT: WIMBERLY - carried • G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18391 - LAND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN CORPORATION FOR AMIN KHAN - A request to subdivide a property comprised of 3 parcels into 6 parcels in the Low(L) Residential District located about 200 feet south of Wilson Avenue on the east side of Winchester Court-APNs: 0201-182-36,- 37, and -38. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Mike Smith, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. He said no comments were received regarding the noticing of the project. Chairman Munoz asked about the mitigations for dust. Mr. Smith said that every project this size requires mitigations for dust. . Chairman Munoz invited the applicant to comment. Kevin Richer, 2313 E Philadelphia, Ontario, said he represents theapplicant, they have no objections, and they agree to the conditions. Chairman Munoz opened the public hearing. Vartan Petrosian, 15285 Jerome Avenue, Fontana, said he owns property to the north of this project • and he was not aware of this proposal until recently. He said this project would only allow him to develop 3 lots instead of 4. He asked if there is anyway this project can be pushed to south to allow him to have 4 lots. Commissioner Fletcher asked how this tract specifically affects him. Mr. Petrosian said he is short about 10-15 feet. He said when he bought the property he was told he could get 4 lots out of it and the layout of this project prevents that. He said he thought that where one street ended on the opposite side of the road, a new street would begin on his side of the road and therefore he thought he could configure 4 lots. He referenced an overhead map of the area. Mr. Richer stated that he did meet with Mr. Petrosian and they came up with a configuration that allowed for two access points. He said his lot may have enough square footage but there are other factors that would come into play. He said they only came up with 3 lots. He said Mr. Amin might look at a lot line adjustment, but it may take more than the 20 feet noted by Mr. Petrosian. He said they might need 30-40 feet and that might affect their own project setbacks. Steven Flower, Assistant City Attomey, said it is purely a matter between these parties. He said there are no grounds to continue this application at this point even if the Planning Commission finds a suitable subdivision as his objection is outside of this review of this application before the Commission. James Troyer, Planning Director, agreed that it is a moot point. Mr. Flower added that an approval of the project does not preclude them from negotiating. • Planning Commission Minutes -10- November 10, 2010 C-13 • Vice Chairman Howdyshell said she-never heard of this type of reference made to symmetry from one side of the street to the other. • Mr. Flower said that representations made to Mr. Petrosian by a seller that sold him the property are not our concern. Mr. Richer said he has-no objections to further negotiations with Mr. Petrosian as long as it is in conformance with the final map. Chairman Munoz closed the public hearing. Commissioner Fletcher said it is a simple, standard application and there are no issues to hash out. He offered his support of the project. Vice Chairman Howdyshell said she is pleased the tract map is in place to complete the street. Chairman Munoz agreed that it is a straightforward, standard.application and offered his support. Motion: Moved by Howdyshell, seconded by Fletcher, to adopt the Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18391 (4-0-1) as presented by staff with the adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, OAXACA NOES: NONE ABSENT: WIMBERLY - carried • H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00551 -DCT 8TH&VINEYARD, LLC-A proposal to develop an industrial/warehouse complex comprised of 12 buildings and 12 parcels on a triangular shaped property of approximately 904,000 square feet(20.7 acres)in the General.lndustrial(GI)District,Subarea 3 located about 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue at the south side of 8th Street and the south and north sides of 7th Street; APNs: 0209-151-27, 0209-151-37, and 0209-161-24. Related files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18794, Minor Exception DRC2008-00152, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2008- 00681. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. CONTINUED FROM OCTOBER 13, 2010 I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18794 - DCT 8TH &VINEYARD, LLC-A proposal to subdivide a property comprised of three(3)parcels with a combined area of approximately 904,000 square feet(20.7 acres)into twelve(12) parcels in conjunction with the development of an industrial/warehouse complex comprised of 12 buildings in the General Industrial(GI)District,Subarea 3 located at the south side of 8th Street about 640 feet west of Hellman Avenue;APNs: 0209-151-27,0209-151-37,and 0209-161-24. Related files: Development Review DRC2007-00551, Minor Exception DRC2008-00152,and Uniform Sign Program DRC2008-00681. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. CONTINUED FROM OCTOBER 13, 2010 Mike Smith, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Commissioner Fletcher asked where the electrical lines and if they are already undergrounded. Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer, said there are no overhead electrical lines and he is not aware of • where they are. Planning Commission Minutes -11- November 10, 2010 C-14 • Chairman Munoz noted that the public hearing remained open from the October 13, 2010 meeting. He asked the applicant if he would like to comment. Dan Floriani, on behalf of DCT stated that they believe they had a good resolution to the concerns • raised at the last meeting. He said they plan to pull electrical power off of Hellman Avenue and this is in their plans. Chairman Munoz asked if they agree to all the conditions. Mr. Floriani said they have no further issues on the conditions. He said the revised condition leaves some leeway with Engineering and they agree with the conditions and they are comfortable in moving forward. Chairman Munoz closed the public hearing. Vice Chairman Howdyshell said she is pleased to see the outcome and glad for the 2nd review. She noted that it was a good report. Commissioner Oaxaca agreed and said we have history with the applicant, and they also have a comfort level in working with staff and that there is some level of trust. He said he is heartened that they can move forward with a level of trust. Commissioner Fletcher said he is glad to see a positive solution to the issues. He commented about how undergrounding is less expensive when there are no electrical lines above. Chairman Munoz agreed and said we partnered with them. He said the project will be in their interest and enhance the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Motion: Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Howdyshell, to adopt the Resolutions of Approval for • Development Review DRC2007-00551 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18794 (4-0-1)as presented by staff with the adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, OAXACA, NOES: NONE ABSENT: WIMBERLY - carried PUBLIC COMMENTS None ## # # # COMMISSION BUSINESS/COMMENTS Vice Chairman Howdyshell thanked staff and noted they are working so hard and produced great reports. Commissioner Oaxaca agreed and said it is all about staff, they do their job well. He said he brags about our staff because they stand out. He mentioned that he asked Mr. Lam regarding bonds about property in the northern part of the City. He said they are Etiwanda School District bonds. He said we were unfairly painted in that situation because in this case, the District had not included a clause that would cover the situation we had where the developer changed the size of the house • product. He said this helped him understand the situation. Planning Commission Minutes -12- November 10, 2010 C-15 • ADJOURNMENT Motion: Moved by Howdyshell, seconded by Oaxaca, carried 4-0-1 (Wimberly absent), to adjourn. The Planning Commission adjourned at 9:15p.m. Respectfully submitted, James R. Troyer, AICP Secretary Approved: December 8, 2010 • • Planning Commission Minutes -13- November 10, 2010 C-16 • STAFF REPORT • PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: November 10, 2010 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM. James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TRAIL ABANDONMENT DRC2009-00848 - A request to abandon two portions of a Local Feeder Trail that lead from the trail between residences onto Ranch Gate Road in the Very Low Residential District. The two portions of trail are between 5272 and 5278 Ranch Gate and one completely on 5340 Ranch Gate Road - APN: 1061-021-02; 1061-021-03; 1061-031-04. This project is categorically exempt from the requirement of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15305 (Class 5 exemption - Minor Alterations In Land Use Limitations). This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Flood Control/ Utility Corridor, Flood Control South - Single-Family Homes, Very Low Residential East - Southern California Edison Corridor, Very Low Residential • West - Flood Control/ Utility Corridor, Flood Control B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Very Low Residential North - Flood Control/ Utility Corridor South - Very Low Residential East - Flood Control/ Utility Corridor West - Flood Control/ Utility Corridor C. Site Characteristics: The local equestrian trail is at the far northwestern section of the City and runs north and south between the Cucamonga Channel and a tract of houses that front Ranch Gate Road. There are two legs of the trail that spur off between three residences. One portion of the trail is entirely along the south property line at 5340 Ranch Gate Road, and the other portion is split between the two properties at 5272 and 5278 Ranch Gate Road. Both legs of the trail over the years have been fenced in. The trail that runs north and south currently dead ends at the flood control corridor at the north end. The south end of the trail is open at the corner of Hillside Road and Ranch Gate Road. ANALYSIS: A. General: Tract 9426 was originally recorded in 1978 and the housing product was also reviewed by the County of San Bernardino at that time. The tract contains 16 lots with single-family residences. The tract of houses is between an Edison Corridor and the Cucamonga Channel. Ranch Gate Road is a north to south traveled local street. The tract • was developed with a 15-foot equestrian trail easement that runs along the rear of the properties adjacent to Cucamonga Channel. This trail has two 15-foot legs of the equestrian EXHIBIT C C17 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2009-00848 — RANCH GATE TRAIL ABANDONMENT November 10, 2010 • Page trail easement that extend out to Ranch Gate Road so the trail does not dead end at the flood control corridor that is fenced off at the north end of the trail. One leg runs entirely on the south property line of Lot 10 (5340 Ranch Gate Road). This leg is located at approximately the halfway mark of the subdivision. The second leg runs between Lots 15 and 16 with 7 feet 6 inches of the easement on each lot for a 15-foot total easement width. This leg was at the north end of the trail so that riders could get back to the street without having to turn around. Over the past 30 years, the two legs have been fenced in and do not provide access for trail users or equestrian riders. The trail easement along the south property line of the resident at 5340 Ranch Gate Road has been closed off and improved with concrete paving and wrought iron gates at the front and a fence at the rear. Photos have been provided that demonstrate this easement runs within inches of the foundation of the house and that the resident's air conditioning unit is located within the easement. The residents would have difficulty securing their yard if this easement were to remain. The trail easement shared between the residences at 5272 and 5278 Ranch Gate Road over the years has been closed off with chain link gates on one half of the easement (7 feet 6 inches), and pilasters with wrought iron on the remaining half (7 feet 6 inches). This trail runs within 6 feet of the houses. Engineering has applied conditions to the project and has been working with the San Bernardino County Flood Control District to enable the trail to continue at the north end of • the trail, through the flood control corridor and out onto Turquoise Avenue as requested by the Trails Advisory Committee. B. Trails Advisory Committee: The Committee (Howdyshell, Munoz, Ryerson, Oaxaca, Tisler, Henderson, and Douglass) reviewed the site plan and photos of the site on January 13, 2010, and recommended that the applicant be required to obtain the necessary permits and approvals from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District to remove the gate at the north end of the trail and replace it with a step through for pedestrian and equestrian access. The Committee was in support of abandonment as long as it did not dead end at the flood control corridor. The Trails Implementation Plan that was adopted by Resolution 91-262 provides guidance for the vacation of trails. This trail was established under Tract Map 9426 that was approved under the County of San Bernardino. C. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under as a Class 5 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15305 Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations because this project meets all the criteria described in the section and is only an abandonment of portions of an equestrian trail easement. There is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within Tract 9426. • C-18 • PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2009-00848 — RANCH GATE TRAIL ABANDONMENT • November 10, 2010 Page RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Trail Abandonment DRC2009-00848 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions. Respectfully submitted, 24- R. jAtti--) Jam$ R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director J RT:SF/ge Attachments: Exhibit A - Tract Map 9426 Exhibit B - Photos of 5272 and 5278 Ranch Gate Road Exhibit C - Photos of 5340 Ranch Gate Road Exhibit D - Aerial Map Draft Resolution of Approval for Trail Abandonment DRC2009-00848 Draft Resolution of Approval for Trail Abandonment DRC2009-00848 for City Council • • C-19 s4 Li I-nice' s4LET 3.OF 2 SMELTS • TRACT N° 9426 to l/v THE C/TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, C4L/PoKN/A •klx6 A wselrlklo i o 00 • -- - It. attc.o au.Dx:.ac OF }K n(1 J.M.WILWH, IVIL E!MGINEEK�wS, n,APKIL,N7 "#""jr------ . -'`f N "-x ;�:, ICI I S-I e' `----j Z °std•— � �. � -- - . . .y. _= 4...'..... ,.e1 D i,. it P = f —tc< R „y„ ...651"° I Z. NN aI'1114 Q \13'Mi r / JJ / a "11;11il x ' �-- +1( IS °c• i �,I- — n �--J_— ...-. ' I` Y` i t7 1 C1 i, sill Inm12,•...�. co SCALE I•n I". J -. a ;_ii .1 II " i-h r :I `• Ia k 4 1 FIJI 10 +li : S 4 ■ it 12.2r .. .. •: t 1 11 tom •,:>�V 23.1 i Ir- £`: i;.: _ it i L .4."',#,C.'° ,,, t i t l,: I• !! �j i,i N J CURVE DATA '- Moms: 't.11 ` :,::� 1 i �1 '- f. toy a n+. T•v • •oxAns nut.nun x:CASS"'ka l'W n6 r i, _ 6 1 °I 3 jI(O ", '. *e- On Sib a.»n,IAtlnts t s ' I I I it^�O �r o toe ,.io _. Z o Iutlwkt SET S lr TAMEtP-ta Ines',v.-mu, Z S; I ••a.- t� ,i .- _ Atilt ^DO SOW Elw m... ,Z Vat tkOrOm SU CES IL k41 Ixi[4 Re0)tei♦ It ..4't,Y t k Y Z t•/ Wu ,k; [E. ewASS Ails TMAe-kamee'y.Li i f-I .v I ;4 �� Q rs+ n wsm En++ 34 1. .4 re, IVei LIMP 046+51.AmK.nex IF ALLt i.-J1 ... .t RACU:.t -;l �::',j.i., s rx[Eeamxis 55154+4 wei_,,,.z ,E,00„T„ Pei .1 tt. <Yl y _I wek 11x5 6 .k".SIS'E"AS _ ✓_LP ,-=O2' I") or c 54515Exerat ealtell45ETDACICCIit,Si evn nvs-.Cr '" i l- 'L ¶ ' 1 A COILS[k,.27 MAS FREP4¢ko 511['AMASS M'ut A54A'.IAlS ,'' ' l I- ^ 1'7 WfM BIT IS,m&,AµE:N LW.t MACE 24611 , • n.x 3 I'' x.its rou tr oav LroTA Nap tan y ll '- re� I — eCcin molt, Cal-Ily WEAE.ls x r tr.. I I` ___ 1-) G I 1 .-, x It Co RI tr.".-./ .I .y. 5 „n6 0 ,t<e ern' I a L' " / N1;`] 1 HILLSIDE' ROAD�'I1 to EXHIBIT A _ li/Oho C-20 • SW .:.,,,..i....,.. .-1.-it':I •.4. ' - - !. '.\..'..- ,,,,,,,r on. ,, ..-) ! ",,, . -4. - •• ""'"- -lir • . .- ....t 1 r. 1.,.,, ..? ' / 0 te'' r '%i l .l i' N - ' , ( t' p z . 1 . ' a 1 .'..:...'7 v Nrl,.."i'. ':$.74... .-....,,,,i...,....-.74,-0.• i „.- LiJ - CD :# t� . th O V i ' W ❑ Q f .i ./.. i•� .� ti 1 Z Q f - - t-••! .,1-...- ...',,bio ":•.- ,..„,-t 1,,3,, 7.,,, . -, `...''.'0. . U.. r: . j pf• : r In 0 .• - V 3 j Z r. ! i }: ' J ci) y k . W 'kt._: k w . 0 o -1 1 ....1 ._ -•-....•.---..:,-- • - ' . .•.....-1..•.-• .1.. • • ' . � , t' -00 O > C.D H '11 . I ♦+.1a 1 I f' `. U LL O H ❑ • 1 ZQZ 1 O _ -�► ,�..,. Q �- Z O W UJ O f W Z Q LL Z w J CNC� f W et Z 101 • CL t -F w CL +; - O III ..„ ,. EL .1. . . .. . EXH1BITB r- C-21 6t/E0110 — - . • .; • \ ,. .4,„„,,,,, , . ... , . t ..... tr, 'r . 1 a 'aZ • 4 , i '`'1 •' I i. i It•' C\I • ' _' a.,t 4,- . :A.411, : . - s, ".• A, r , ' 7*Iiitfi%)/ , i •t•- •,* '. - 4' • ,, .0 CI • t i ,..-- .. 4., • •Ii 1 . 117 1 . . N..... C\I . H U j t. , ' . . li,, .1. 7b.11.1.41. ,fif• 1 1,;‘, RE;. CN , \I!le OC\IC'?)il . . • ' ...- CNI , • 7.4i ' x--- 0 .. .. , ,i •• ,." 1 .. IlL 4. Z e......4 '. •tei 14? , t. Z I 4 ,,,a :......... ..., _ _ . • fril ; Cl- ILI , at :..,— ti ,ii 4411, i.t 4. ,'.• -..,:i r ', .. , , . _ . . - . . • , P It, ,.., 4 c . ,•1 < Z CL }4• ... J _ , , +,., . • j, S ' f. .- r .4 . . 1,4..... .;; • _-J < .• . , • .,, - 4 • -= Z i - : ••./*/'1.., ,044 _ A• ... 1.• i A 5' ' -1 +r- 's,' AI r• ' ' A- . ,4 J I— ' . . . • 4-..4 ) ' : n.4" , ;1-• s: -: *'...' itAi.'I' '••-te 0_ • • f. ,. - .•'..... . . . .„,:it,-,... . .1- 1 11 , '11•. • ! 17.3 , - . • . -$N. c a_ • .- - , ......... ill • • . , • Ca - :- "4.*- - - .. .. . 4 - ‘ • -Ili -4 ' • - 4. - _.,A,-, . .1 ... i • ,:i'.. ;1•••■•••■• i • ' H Ce '3._ ' . SSIV1,44... .' / ..S,,_ a:'1' ir, . • ..,...... . ,:1=Nan• ..."1 ' ... q: • .• 1• , r -.••• . ,.i.h' ,,,e -,-• 4 .3r. I— LI-I ,. . . - ar• YPe, 4 , ...,,...1 • CY) . " - P ■ , U1 Z "' - -" N-4 ...mi.. 'ch./ -it • - . ,r r i r r. A.• • - ' ''1141 1 il i 1. ji ' W Ce s• •••*. v..' ,* 41 's 1.-.4, '4.4e, ''-' ''',/,',:i-'.1 1,11 N''... ' ' ..li ' •\*.i- ' • r.' - • '' LL 0 ' .''' d ":' :: ' + t • . .. 1' !‘ v. CNI i - *4' 7-• ,", ' •1 1 It•, . ' - i,. , , ). 4 4. co 'It 0 0 . . , _, • • ,,. , • ), - .44 . ; , .. • ,ic..4 ., ;N. . • ' 1 , . . ■ A . r ....N . Z * CL , . • . , ) ,-‘ •• . . •r__.,,,.... .4- ..' . r 11 __ _ 'I • i 1 i..- • , _,,,.... -1 • ,.., 1\+7%. .. .. • • . : "44101116. .9... - - ,4 . • , I A' . • .- _ . i.AW:4•;,-"uwit■4 L*,' r • ,.. . i-,...e... .. -:••• - .. ..,, ,t,, m.e.-4;,..1...1 .......,.. ,., 4 •. ...; .• -§e 1 ct, .:.v- .?, _ . 1• / 4.1k. ''' ilot..:. rt - • A - .. \-.3,;,, --: lc • -'-' .AV:. ' • _. ------,,. . -.. ... CD CN _ • " •• --pies- 44'- . , a e - -4..,.. • • r i ‘ Aiallik in ' •• •■•••• , (i) - r• - •f, . , •'1„,):: ,i,.. Z .47 : -‘ .'1+4 .."'• 411 0 , - .. - •'..‘ i , . . . . 0 ,. • ., ,• i . •.e D 4 - .1,. • tiz•,;,'..., 1....r.e.- -- - \ Ct . . H • ,• ,,,• , •• .. f • " -f. '11 •- -..• t Ci) 4! .j.„...: ,f. . . • -. I - 1 1 CO a, •. . , 0 • ,..., • 0. . k .••• 001 _-.3 doe?" I Z ... . • .;4 . ' < 4 .... - . ----.. . ." ( ,...., . .. . .• a r ,....„. 1 '` 's•' , t i Liters. ' - ,.1 ,' 1.,T;', W'. f p, . •I• 1' I .. JJJ . - -w4L� AAR, r .t / , . 0 W litir , :% N Q• ! '�e: /'.f••4.•-L . '.• . W 2 OO•■ t y >'' Z a Q :14� r 4 r, •- f H. 1`� O , , Y IL z 41 -i,..- i ' • 0 0 < 46 1 g111000111111011.- .14.1411W i. ••'_„ :yp :, �♦ f: ,� Z O O W LL CL Ct • 1j4 .. {tidy INK - • t t z• •s ih,\•Z‘..Z 6 4 . I ' 1 .1 ,vt:'. , . r,�_. + , iliiH.' . -_.... - �S�'-arks. "'.w , r • (Le a. .�« � . ., I �, ,, _ ,h I •} ' , , ' ` ' j� 4< '` , . •,.k.; . ,1. r.i ) l •• I { • _. 4 1 •/N �. -• ,, : it 4..1!•- �//I -, • ' «I r ''I—• 'I.L\t- ' 1t a'� e II / .lit T,: ,. • . ; I , . w,. , -' •-• •CN CO it ■ '3•4:. t 'V ' ' , . "ov, . 1., : • - Lt e.1".* ;I 'i .6'./1 11 ,, . '•■ . ' '•••', z J ' .•'. � ..y, •-.I i At t L•{•( 11%,; 1%. ,\/•1~,`..1a �' W • p• + 0 _ , i;trtt, .',1 a i11I`1 �1 r . �' -1 , F'., 1 1'•, . _ •• rt / 1 ' i'i t t L .) ( . ,,,.:, . ill, : . if,.. : ob.. .,, .ito.4, , :t., ...‘ . / ; I. LLJ . ,.V It •s•i nto 4y •.1':: co �.._. ti • ir.- I j r:•'.. _. 1. Z i I'•.AI. if4+ S,"r. + • 2 t'!• ', i 1•i� � , � e •�'.� �' ;4..,,...,,,..,., 1 i 11 i�7i ' -r y 1. h► C.) pH ' '' i ate,. ; >;, , . ,•1 4 « 1 t � ,� r CN ��,, :. :. !:.,1,••.,. . . •,1 .• • (• 0 ,. . ..,,,,,.,4 ., q• .,f ii. .:-.1.,:t � ,fit '4, •• . . .1:, i'. ..,;.‘ ,,,,I. .4i . ,14r 0. „,. , Z t�• i 1 .. .♦ NI + .ftt �lN I• •\i . 1. . �+i F��4.F `yjr.•• L.L. j,. .�1F --.�.t ` ' -� , 1.1 , , M j4•f� it, +. ` ^' { 71+ _ c 1,r i :� ., *,u itt , 1 �, r 4. .,, ,,t . i . '4‘:•• ZiAt‘h• 4:1;tis-.1WJ's' '44i . .. L. 1.1.-.‘vt,1 ••• ': ...• " '• : ' '14* —1.' ••• 0-,,•;•4,4-,4: •i. s .$ ,. ,,•-.4:%:•Ji,..e,..‘‘ ..4.,4.1:,• -7•.1••••....1 i:,..N-1.t•• . 14=.. ,• '04: . .,:f: '- �,- b , ,�' It 1. '" . Z +. p . ' •> Y '' al r 1 J ■ �' ,--1' `t '• •� 'L �• '- _ '''.. ;j :{ d.-•1 I w Z. • I f: '• : lie t4 ilif• ? "•011411iii.:NI•l',,,•441!?4, LL ....1 t.■ ,•,,. < . Ilito. 1.1 . , /..'* fit' ! ., ,! + '• .1.. !V 1, ,'� ,♦ i 1 • ..• ° e . , .4'' ::: ,.: ;..,‘ 4 %a r • Ii i}jp ! ♦ t. • .f 1):.,".: 41°14, -.....:', .._ /V. . N ti I . .�•... , .. .- ,y qfi � !O ` t , � ;� ' s } a • ;'rte H W Q . LL 17 i ta ..i. tl .. 1 1.... le-F,,,‘,.._ , M,� w yy r w i � � r// G" �s S C W U . 4 y u .�. .. . • • f tr- %% '. l I • - � . . I�jA�' 114411IP iiififr 17, '' , 't . . * r." 41°(1*.# ifr41140111 .•, Y .. C25 t� ; ,f•4 ill' • . illTipi1/4.4" , ieb i . • r ',, #• , • . , , t J • A $4 $ * . . I.,.4 ,. • ,,t ' $ , , fr. , j..4,,". ... ...f- ..•. Iii ' -'n .., f i . , 1 _, at_NA . . . ,y 0, vt. 1 ',,, It. id,'Ill! .7" % e. .y 47,,,x-,. . i .011 • . i ' CN CO ' iv:-.1.1. •..... . ' ' ' * r-''• i 11. • iki • ‘ ' i 1;••I .....' ■ s' . 1 CD 0 1 , I • , : " ., bie i • 44; .. • • • S 1 . II. . 4 , --v. . 1— \-- . up 1- 4 • • - N CN pl. '0..:11r-",--..'‘..••-.. ......4 :- - - • I . . •• , - 1 - %liat's, •„, .-.• lir .f• ‘-- ' -- - • I 4.,, .. .. ...r..-• . • • N N Z ., .. . 'f-4* .-, -- •-,-- '. '..... / CD CO 11- 1.1.1 . . 4,„s . ,..,.0 „ ,,, .. „.. ....,... _ _ , C) 0 0 2 .4 .00, . jet -..,...,\...6,-.-.3 • - . , . .. -• . •- z, w ,t,w ,' I • -- -- H IJJ • ..,....c .,.., .....„ .34• .. ,.. ... . $,. • , Z Z • ., • ts:•1',...-,,...,..0,.:.•':. ' . . --- .1.7 •, ..,,, • .g......, #A,. ' Cl- a_ .1-7.-. , < < W . -,.. - ' tq' ,, .1.....:, , 41 , -' --lio.."—.:: ' n' ,,c, .. *. ' .44-415111 * -•'43'. * -' - V‘.• • . • t k•-. de:' . j , 1 H i jr.i.. •/ 0 i: . ..... ' 7 A 4 ,' t.V- UJ . • . til 1.* ., . 7r, - ° - •iffc LLI •• .., .a, . ... . ..,11 . LL - ; .r: ikii 4r- ., , , A4 fil -9 fAis - . r , , r . .r e 0 ,....- ..; 4r i , N." •i l4" ,-.4.- 44, . e 1 • -I ... • K : ....-- ,. . l z' .„,7 . .- ,:• •• .... -..4-1,- - ,- .k. . ...tett* ' g • ,• _1,F ,, ,T,,-. ,., ,. , , ",..,, - , - T A .. . ...‘.. • : . . ...z. : ,. , • . ._ > - r‘ ,- _ '''-'7''. - ‘• . N . . 7.--:- ' __-- -' ' 2.,-:-- - 4 ..4, • . 4. 2.-A. ''.414-.".' r . ....=-. - . . '•-.c-; "v-..-t,-.):.t:,1•,:e''.)11,..',.'.•''''.''?' ..- ." --,- '44:-:---A-.,.::"•t--y.'.•."4.‘-.-,--..--,....•....--...,-..--`...-.-4:',, ..---•-,.-..- .: ..' :I.; :■ i! ,, - .,.•." . • A i - .4RA-1..... .... ...... . -•,..; - • - %,,,.' — - Z-..... -_....... ..4-.,....; . !.- ....;:. ,4,•.,.- . . .7... ....-7, i.,.. , , ..- .. •••• • ,.., - I -__ . ._.... . ' ' k. 4. , -- • ik-.) i - ;',110.1r" . ' ..-t,4. 1•L LIJ - -. . - . t ......14+6 .1 ■ ''''' ' -t. .•. e t t . (....) . 1 • f Z 'A•• . !NI '41. . — * - - L.1.1 . ,.,.. .... .... - ‘ - • . „-..,,, ..... . . I . Li... ...,...,..tirci:-. 4... ■., .... . A 1 14., v•gl;,- , AQ'itt.i. 4 .14 :',""' "CS''1. —I - .*--....*••,,', ,0 , c Wt.■t -IL, ' It N'V )1' •• 1...,14, : •-•* lik,Cte,•: *7. 0 ....t..i'7,‘--- - '. . • th , c S ,../ •:.,1...... 3.;... ' • ::, '•,at_a•..,, 1 .41 :■4•,-'' '' 6 C ,••,...... - ■ • • . • • --,,,, ,• , ,.... ... • _.....,. ........... • • . . , • . -- ,• 1 i -, : "•.-,. ... . A '. ..,. --„-' . 0 t . A- . ,c • .. :: •• #. • ' : 11 ' L' * -1, ■-.. ,,,, 01,- .. . A 1 '• ‘' . , ...A s, • 11" .- Vi' . , .■S s - C:I (1) - \,• 10: ' A. .* • 4 - s.) •: .• 4 • 1 ' • * 0 U-I .., . , .... .... • 164. ,t,_ •_, ‘ . , , . CC) • i 0 I-- : . —44 .. . .'' **'-• .. ,, ,,,, ,.;,.., ,:. ..., • ,$ . '+. a.. 0 41..4•1 , , .'4 • b • . ‘44t,", • t • . 1 ''New •"' ''', ' ".444 .....t 'Ijb k... . 1 t,,:." kir • , >t N . C.26 '.- ' • At. ,, J40';.--• A ., vr4 -.v., ..- ...t .. . .. ., , - ... . .. . . :* A ei '4 c•• • i • of . . • " I - •p Itlit. loft.,Fit • • .41.1 II . ii .., . 1 • • . th.;,. 1 C) .• 4.41111 • , , ,.. ,Al , • Tr. it. • • • • Ibit I • .1',_..'silijipte; A , •116. ' •. . IIIP • IP if, pr., . . , • 40/0 0.- ... . en • r ••• IN ior •,,, •?1, . it 1 N— • . 6 ' 44• - ' I •5- UJ . ..- ....: A -1,■ ,r, _•-• . ..,.41...1 1 .4 ., '01 . .... ...•4: . x '"' 1 • ' Z • i 4 1'. 4 ..., . . 4- f' i A'' ....s. • • . .. , 4, it 6 .• • : -,,-,'• 11. ti.0., , . $".),,,:1•41- •7.l'. •.,, t...#1.,4, . . s• v. , . • CC) :, . • . ,,,,:' • .vie As or III 114,0,- -1. 't. -4"1'. %. ,••..4,:.••ei., . ›- C/ , 4 . •• •264 er.j..... 4. ' egifs-s4L44 ... .". ' Ilk-lip■ i t'i4'1%. . • .....••41'144 .* ' . ' • st.-All • e.fl.., • . • • 5 • 1 A 3. ...Fit • ,'- • ' ,4`. f2 ,-* .••• ,, 1J...1e- •''' .4,441 1 ..•-.. 4 .. .. ._ -4.•,,••.a-•,',I),4.74,. a a lo, ,,..„ • .1,, a VIP' LI 1 yr:101r Z _ I. Of, • ,,. Alt „„-: 4.„ eq. . •■I 4,6. ......, er,,, rt,i.• lb.ft lel I,.:V ' . . / CL ... '‘,. /I! •••• J ..,• 4., t., ' (..k 7 4-- %64` ,-k .. pt7,4 • f4a• .. . .. ,.. .• . • , i li_., a < • • ... .. , i ,1:...•'1 et• .-/- 1' .0 • • - \ fie C e, ... t . ' f..: ,.•,a. .,d..rierleft. :IN/'Pr ti.,4„.,yrk, . . ,,i,• f• • f • .• . , '•• ..,•..4.." f . 6 A . • • • (.0 •1 . .•:.,•e..i..''•••• .• .. '".'1'•.•6... • -•;\1•:`,. a. •••. A •`. ;T.i,.-•t.'-i-..5"':'t' -•:-.--: ,t:-.-.-.,,.,• t i • - le . 'l''e. •#• r --' •,-.. - lb ;..-' .. 1 .. rk •- •*.; . - "C. .., ,,....>.•: -..'.y- . ,.." - • ;r . , .).--i" •'. ...-• .• .- . lh ' . ' . C -" - 1`,"".$2"-''' •i".--' ' P•: lk-- * , -6 • .•• . . • • • ' .' S•• .,. • 4 \ :lie+ .440e)• ifir1111-: • 4:" ' "I'' '... •••• ' . .... I'. 4 ■••, 7 ', 1, ler. .\ ‘, ..,p• •,'• , ... 1,,,.. A .. . ..• ) .wr. ' •'.• • " ge• ;1.1) . ..- - . ,• ' ... a I,-•.' : ..•••%.. —.),. :- .r . .- . -'de, . .. ....40:2,.' . , -..0..:•,.,.-. )1411r. .1 '''' .....s, . .-• ..,..,(1, . ....4 . CO .. .1 4i t:-. - - — .PV • • '..:' '.; ... . -: ...._____.....4,____ . . ' -t, • I. •%AI... - MC.;11. . ' . r‘tiv6e ' I .4711, 0 , ‘V,• . •") 1* ,41 -::: .,,,::• -..- -•.' 1 110:,•• ••4 -sC .'r •'. - - :-.... I -- ...r' :4 -,-.c.,„ • •A, ••r. . Ot, -• - , r: ...4 _ ... .....4. ,4kit-, • ,i...,.. 7,, 7-- • - .' • •1::'1''. r'‘ ....t■-• N •-, • - .. ... . • :., ..t.x . ../ k....:,,,,......,,:..:-.•,.,..f.t. """ 'di- 41111.,•..,... -10, .... • ir- ,-/ ___ . ti........e..„,„ . _4 4#_ - --'1,-.7\.'' 1.! -: •••'....;"4'7'',,*1''' 1/41t, ..1 ' 3:- '.. 0 e • • • .... ...„ ' . .-_ e!g--.:•;c:::_:i;: : i 11-, •-•'''r ..,.•. . . r_. _..-.„.!1 4•:„z--.•,■-,:,,,..-.4._-C-.-.,„ -, -.;-sdi - ' i , -. 3'- ;'Nikita 1.. • 0 , • -1 ,. --, -\.• i ' -- •• .,- _ . _,.....1-,-.•:•- - , N-- . .1 • • :-•T . 1,.■.,..,.—:-..'-.% 1 ' -' . .-1:. i . '••• ft i". Obdia./.,, . . , N544r.44 0.2C. • KV. z-Zifa-,, 1%. „to A. ; .;,, . .,,, .--... . _ .. - - IL. . . . ..... . ii„ , Z _: ..-,:- , ?. ..,. . • , ...._ -1, . .4,t; .. it. ... • • . i...1._r_.......„. . • 4' . ..1 ' . _Al..1. % ' • ir, ..ic los , 0,, . 0— • •-.. ligf.„ - -- • .. -,,.‘... . • b, ,11. . ... -• . .. ... 041, ■ . Ak. ,0 . 77.. S.::: ' 1 r '-; * '....."i■! .. Ii., _ i , . . .R. . 4 ir• .. ..... - :z. . .:. -'' ,..,.... A ).4,7".), , ■ • , 4 ../1, 1 , ler- . . i....;...-... • .•• ....„. , . .. * ii.L.,, ,•.."., t i i'll.' .. /. ''-1■4,...7 - • .41;•, . ' •- " ti. Ii.`-k ' 's .. ''' , ,,,t*-14 ' •- • .417 ": 1.1t, r . , j 1 • ; • Tee 1. • , emr \ .. ..... ..7,,,.•••• • . . ,!,' . r-*•`.. .. ..,• i ' . *, 4 •te%, -. .1 i,, .. 'Tr, \ .- • .gli*- . ..f •••ht'7111 .. A • ■.-A... ..: A.. -. ,.s, ... if), ..:,. .., .2 . , •.,,,,,,.... . i ..i ./ 1. • ••', • , •re 1,r, _ .. • let 0, ".. '••:‘• . .4.„ . v. .• ''• /I • r ., 41( ' • 4., •t• 4.e.;, .4.:"..1. •s ,.... ‘,7 ' •.. 4 ,. 1 4:."Ikez.rfo.i 4. . .kw r !- '1 -:'-e• 4 %4 ..? ' ;‘..e 4:..'•j, w•-se'•u .4? ' .,44-..,,.. :., ,. • . • •-.. .,ira-...- .....4•C•4 1 • '' • ' • ' 't : 1•0•L(.•4"b-• •-' , f , !‘ ,4 s'....,5%itt'; . r ; 1,.. '7, • .7;••';4 'le'-.--' 'we te;ll'!i4i..''l" . • •-•..01111gt , .•. 4'," k_ .,, - .i * --, '• 47■-....., 1.A.z.....A..... .,,,,, ...... ... .... . . qt....1;\, -1 . ......w•$ .. , • ... . . • .. , , ..,. ,..,.• • elit, r. (C) - "4. : i•• 1/44 ..r.Tv.,„. .p • .......71. . 7r°F. '.,"! . .0%14 I_...Jill.e t 10-,. I . 'V • •, • 4 • , . 1, .i: . • , , ,0 - . . . f. d:•-. Nt... r...... 0..441$ . .„ •••• •. , - 1,-1 1 • ,.., • ‘, • lit • '' i lic4.3IN'. -, ' -1 .' '. .1 . ) . • . ' '• .iyi t ,- „' ;V 4 f - ,, , • ,...t . ...? - .... • tr. 1 , p4,.... ir. \ •*•*, • . . .,'S !I. . . •." ,.. , • - 0 ... . r 4. .',',.• .1 0. A. • ' ,- , I.-, • • . r• ' • 4 . ‘ • i .•.111. * • .„ • •-"' .,:• . • di ." . • 'N .. 6. ' '.. .. •-, gt .• :.t 5, .,to • N' 4- .l- ., 0 .,yrk..0p. . ,'‘1,4 Pr, .)..1' ••' • . e, i I • ' 4; _ t ,• 4.... . 1 r-. : .; 7 ., 14,',,,,.er..- .,. :. .. .)1 0/ t . 4 , •, , ...4 aro ,"••'••• 7' . ' .4 I 111 ' 7 • . ' r 4,4 T “r. i , "%cr. . r . ; .. ... 4••• , ,,,sk. . i • 7, ,i, ,i,' 1 'T' • • 1 • . . ;,, .--r410,116.7 , '7 ir ),., .. .... _ ,. • . „4 , 1; , ,,..-. 4 . • ... '•'.. . .• • .I"' I ' ,A ori *.4/4 i0e..1'1..' • •-: •..•-=. s....• . •.•i•f f.f°."4 1IC7 45 I t t,/ ■. : .1 • •' ' r• Iq',.. . T--ti 0 i ,••0•,.-* ,- ,.- 4, ......"0 4,1"A• • V14%, 1,4.ge...'titts...1 .1-. 1.17'‘• i• ,•, b. ,',' ‘'7 4•1.. .'2 1.•).' 1,,•1• i . 1 t i • .i Ni , . _.• i 'se,. . I f f , . ,..i . ,. . t,r i y, •t 4,111:.,,k c 1 a is; ••• .ki..„.• ese-t.,..41 F 6,'):JO p y - . # 1, 1 Idl tifir , ta , ."9 ..k.,s, , 44 r,� �, pmt . f�.r •t.` �'� r�.0-.ii,..0%,,,, :Cri. r:;. .711‘,.:::fp, : ''..''fr 1 • tis ' ■ f a •d s 4' t 30 pr,/,' i ■ N r{ , -tom• • ' ' — 7 4.7,1M "rs WG /fit, ,} N � -,.fir .N Vii- W /" -•• 'S : . - I /.fit 1 ;.I. - ;J: , • •, • ' ',J: ' I -t } . r . Ji r . ,�A ` _ i _ tj lb i- ,- - - Q �/ ;rte 1' " ,-..r.-.J 1_ a• + ,, �� ;14 to,,�' i,ik 411-V. fi H . Et II .... ......4. • , •• ,,s,,,, -1.‘ ,4,...„ , ., — .„ p, ,,,‘N . . ,J CL . O/'7k '-';,7" + `15' ..;. ,• 's. - 0 ill= - ; *' �'� ` is 0 ,s 'ti• -.. : ti). ....,?M �: t � Q• (J) � i U V +?,i 4;.' .v .e;y i Pk% Ill z .i.t .._•.... , . ,,,, , : „ ....,... .... ,,,,, ,,, 4. oo `, •.%,.':- , , 4 ''S7.. .'' ' . i ''' .g.'-''-' :s ,i. ''''1% 8 . .. ,,..4,,:. ... „ ..4‘ . . s ,1.. . : ,it 10 ro .. ri sue. ;' 1 . , Cr • , S''' f\ 41I ■ f. S. C 7.. P. if . • e•!1- t Y,N;k• 1 y,�. _ ' gilt , ' fir . ,. . , O 4, a• M ` � O LC) ;* CO O ctS -� _ ear I r . . -.,• ..., . . . e i t . 0 o rI y - - - - Q . _ ` a t - . ,a_ , I U z a f If ... i, ..‘ I . g „ --, 0 • ..,.- _. .._ . • — , .„! c, ., - ( f . -• . ce) L.c.) I . a 1 EXHIBIT C , ' ' C29 II/i0 I i0 r r, i . . .. . ,, . , , 4 ,..exl ..., , if' 0 . . .. .a. 1 :re •. 'j,.. •� C` :' 5• •t A l 4 .-, . q . i - gT�1c r L' . . . _ . ,,,..-i.„ _ r . •'-ter -��YY `� t5'.-k" yyjg' • N. ,r �T i 7,• i ce { •IS`}•T'^d?.`N. ‘-•`''S 7 h•i ± y % .r _-.rrr:- O -.gr..:'. Ri 1} h :a. t • t- -.7.4":"..Y i} :• yy;�` y°!1 Vi, . , �� !'1".. ° y t i +'' at�R�~� ;• L •4k- ...4 . .� ki ,R' ' i. 't. r..... _ . .t.1.k. _j. . 4 /W �. '• i a Q < �'' :K ,y 4'�. 'i. • CL it l i , :{ a I .;;. Z -11 (I) ,e' � 4s .�. .� 11,x. Q '� i 4. w rn V V "IY N o Z � t/ y M /+ W W a . ;. ;r '� LO 4000p. I 0004 1jili*x..1try' Y'" �'� .. C-30 1.4.-- ...• . dr..-. ' . .i. V, - ...al • .• ' ;re •lb., , • • . ,a ` - ..!:•;•111t - • 1 g-'!. -..' -4'.. • • .- -.. .. . • .. -74- •-4 14 0 4- - ..t ....,..., ,..:., . - 4 I 1 ' *1 • •• : . : - i■ - Z.:: . A!, -. -4-1 C • . fel' .., . .,,, . ' . ..••• . — ',c . ','• .: '- ' E - . - -_, I. a) I ' - Cl) _,..0..... , -- 1,•_''.• . N.-. ........_...,..-- CO A ej. •irr....4,..--.- • : .4.1 a.) • .40• r• • -c• ; J . 4-•• -C ' . „:0 '•N. •1141!: ..... ..,.• 4...0 ••• -F—' ' I-IN'•.■• ..t ■'*... ' .,.. c*: •--40* c•'‘ , =.- -k, . ,.-. ... , ,tii ...,, I ......2.10,.... V"-. a) •••r c , -1•■•■••..4. - S. . '- . • 0 , ","... Ay."'" •0`.." . ;113.;•41.'. -C6 E . a) 41(1) ..-7),a •e''E •4,;•," . I . • •, 444. ll 4 ktit.:*'' • ' '. • V) (1) ' 4- • '-1,... , .. "" cr) 11'... • "'''' . - ,r4-,-- .44-1, ' ' - C 0) 1..... ' •■••1.01t; r •fj,-",„„gir - 4••••,r -4- • •_ or, c _C >, •.: .7450,r.: I - •• •- • . -I—I - .t, ',••- l 'I .••*. •11, :owir ' .`.•• ••• *••, ' '", :•;4•or Art.r.-- • N-- § C ) 0 . CD .- ,. ..A' -... . -,. .., ;,-. • Q. -■ , . 0 0 i• • - ,-... . p - 4 .01,7.•s, ,,,,,,1/4.: 0 9 - -‘,..!!!!! la 1 ,,,,.. .IP - •1"., ,..._ , 4. ..,. - -. .;....14..• gem Lo— CD ;-. - CD 0 ,... :(\s...-•.,,,,,,'.4.-• :if t 41:4:» E L. o • - 4„....,..- .-.a : . .--.... ,.i ...: .. . ... . . 44.. mu) , . • e cf) ,.., -ID ,.,,•. • . ., -• A+'''',*ea cr,41.11. . k , .. .. _ •.. •. :-....-.. _,,-....- .: a.... Z -.--.•I ttA•g . CD .'0 •7 ' •fr- , : .••'"i'..:": . ..' .' . '4• ...- r..'''t - fl. .- ' 4. a) = :, " "';--', •'• - • /10k ..41.irix..).7..: ...' :::; ■C .0' ‘, 5 U) D 1 -I-. •,. ..s.,•/;;-. - . 4. - •;„ Yf ! -: -..,_.1" •'' -. 1, ..• ./s. , '• c v D 1 d...,%, . .. — - -14$11-aa o 0 u-FLavoi _c -4— . „u). t.• - .- , ; ... < 7,Afibrz u) cp a) L- . , ...1r,. . ....,....,::,-..,::..,.....•:. . •"- ':. •.,. 0 • ... _ 4,-. , .0. •16_ , !:-- 527i .' '':. ■--....,.... • , ' e- .`)- - • •,- .2 • -...._.: .. ••I• ., • • '....1 0 CD -- - C ti!,42 : •.ar"-: ...4%;:e : • --- , . . = CD ! W , -... ..'" --ri...-:,,.... .... ..= -' .,, %A.,...r 4; .• • •.' --..)dkvik. „:4. :. - • '..i. _ 41,,' s • " ..k.S "h4,,,'• - ' , - .71:11.... ,. -,IP' • - , , ■ I— .•Ulf )ii ' • #4,0-."- .,, ..,- < . , I " ■ s ..: .., .• ; .1(0. 4.171/.1.. - Ir.; ...• . .- '-.••.o'• ,. „of 4,- 't • .4■114, . e••;4,,i„••• - . 4,,.•- , - i .. , .- 'hi. . •• CD - - - .- - -- "., . . - 4 o• a"...,.. AP` • 41... . . ' ' A . 7::;.4.4 9.7',.. ,,,.A .-.'''1 1.:■.* . .6%i 0.,44.,' • ..• .4:' 1°. ...1 ••""••• 1 l'. I i it'•,,.',. 0 N, • A 41000•00 t;...e. '• •1/4!ie.... 'V' . ..4l: . ••• rikafar • 'a ...•;•;_.- 101 ' " l' 0 I't .,,,. . ..S. 4 ?:., ... -...4%0-. 40! /"... ..:,. - *.z: w.. i- • ': , Z • . : .... ,• . C---,... . „ lk,. , . .4 .ap • < •••• • . '' • al '•lll i .. :. " 1.9'Y'.%..1.2,4*-„..t,1::1' .ji,6 .,...16•44. . . i "1'- .sr.,$) it".. A." .iv, ... .2 it, ra .4. "i... • . C 12 'f'. --‘- • I;-... "... 'C- f '''''..,:'. - .1 • .4. -. .• '- ..... „— 4 ., /6)1. 4-Vite, $.- .-• .} 4 . , ,. A..1r • • ,. . c7 .,, ,,, . sii. :r. . ,;,...s.4 ' --X.,-- °ids' •' 4111k)r ...'•1: ±...- :4_, Jo t'.4 . 44"lat-6':- '-'' ' .-iw.P.-.: ; • , • +a CO - 4. k ■ ' 4'4. . r VI !1,410. ....i ' .1. . ' 6 - _ • , 1 LC) 160'. ket, ; i • - Yast.., '. ' .. • Olt, 14,1', -- -. - . -• . . , ...- , Ce• . , . , . -4 _. .— C-3 1 . . il ' vA ' ' , „, 1 . ., . i .. 7 :t1'.- .0' ) .".• , ' N. , • ...,. ,. . f, . ' I' 1 N. \ 1 1 4 ) 1 pl P4 , . J • . , 1.)• . ,_ •I... , •1. • i 1 • \1 . 0 ,:. ! t ' . • t , •••,, __ • i 11% tot • ,. ) ' * '";'‘i • . . . .. I.,. . • ..---'1.•4 Lt. '-' - kig...14 4. 4 ,-.)-1; . ..,,..:, . ... .... , le lip le:.If t -4 • - t • • 45 -r .4, Ail :1,,,:.'• ' • .1' • .- . ' . 'i'•'1..--• it. , -41/0 *j . i-iiik, -.1)''.-e. t. ...„ ., .. 1 A . k.: . t. ,.2 ; ,..,• 4Av lif-,,,,-• .1“,--ft, ••:- . . •. AP4:-.• •V . . A• . •• k. ' -..1 ,..4 t •,'■ 1 4 -- -" . .. "V f, • . . --..- . • , ',...). -4.• • " ollt. < .4.• • -4 .• .. iiii'ill • .. CIA.:.•••t:k'P•Ilki • '' ' • '.' *: '•11 ''. .t it . 'ow • 1 k-A,41.1.... • • .,PlIr : ' 1••• '41" )'•• t, .. 0 ‘ . 4::±.., ,.•11......... , .•.-- • I• •. i • 4 ot ..x ., -1,,., .. ,A, -.., , ..., •.,,,c-- ....A.i-f ,. r 7r• ' 'I,.1 t - —Am ,e.y.,.' /0 4 " ri.'"' ..c. ir•0'--411110,0 ' ..u._ir:. , ''.. . • ■•r! C., r ,A • :1...-...,i,,40 1.1‘,g)'• .., ...-\ -'_ ", .44.40 x- 5„ ,...- 7.....1 • . ..„i. •c:;,..'t:- •••1.-, . •°1... i . i •' .- •, .. ‘r.til" • . ..., - .1.' 0 -- - • , A i -, 1 - 4- . I-leo'- . , -re '',. • --...‹." ' : .. 1 . lit• -Iv", *,, CO / CI ..".....s ▪03 . 71 . . "it% iwl..:-. . 1 "0 . • . '• -_' -4117. ., -• • . .... ' V. _4 . • .., 41.• . % .. CD Ir 4 .- • 4 `;'''•^` 4% ,,,:t ,, . • 4 ...•,21 ...ii.,. 0 "i■J * i . .4 ••••• ■ - „ ••‘ts'i./ZV.,•i : — '• • ...-- E .„....._ _ -4.:k..• ' ^ * . 1 i...1, . "." .• 4.,.• lb •,- ;• iiiiiiki - ..,‘..:-•": - -. •,_- Z 1 -• N -.•X 4 471%'',...t■:,"‘‘War • • .. l-- .: .-••• •• '•••••...%• 1. -:-..‘te;t :Am: •-•‘•-••• , .C7'41 .....0 - r, . "0 CD ti6‘ .• - - •••-.- $ - -,...-444,44, „ , iiii , k,.•-:<•r : ..•--- 'V , 4-tir..; ‘. -1: ,...„,,,-*-4 .%ift •. ';'" C "0 't,,, 7, - 'f• 'Th.': .. ', v" : -4 ,,, ... ..en ... . ir -• 4- -- 1*. ‘.• T.'"Ir". 1 ...4' .", -. 0 .5, a'-',-, ''' 1 ... f' : . . .: '''.*4,1 . , .#.. . • Nit 64..... '' , .• ig . w...ir. , .. ...„ _ ,i? • .,,,,...• %Ad .• .... • i . . - . r• ' -. Vs ' .... ., -... 0 . .. 1. .e0.-..- .._, 1. C "-•40'14 14‘ 0 -11.....- - . ..i ,,, 4 1, • -; . 4., ' .1 • --.'; :*--kl,WIN1/41.iltiltS".■: •- ••"•-- *.r.r 40 Ce ...„.„,.... a) Lo .. . . • . ... ...... w E •,-- .........., , . ,. ,,...... t_. -,............„..,.. -- .• - -- - < t/J 4-I 03 _ 1 Cn CO 0 C Z 0 •— -C C g Cn 0 0 :12-2 ••1 ; -0 0 0 c III Is, C•32 i. sl. 41) ; ..... ...4 . .... , • t....,„ .• •I . . • • ....) „ ... ..1 , ,. ._ 4' • . e i. t. i i • .4 •• ; I.. 144, IA 104 t • , ...i ' . . ...: ..‘• 1.. . 1 '• . 1 '1 ,• , I . s '.' ' s'i • ' •• r -- •:-. . • ' 1 ' .'. . •: '' . ' ' ..\ : --._, • • i , 1..• • ., les' • . ,■ i. ,, \ 1 • 'I..' 2. • .... - . . .',.; 1 •••-•••`4 .,,,•' k l'.• ci . . • ' • "• '-'" '1.71 , •Al`■''' C.-. -7,,CT-mg--14, . , . . ..,, . , . •....„ ____ .I ' I.' ' ' 11; i ' f' . .;, T' ' . • • • .i. • _ .1 -0:,1..•••• • •' .... t N 0 -.•' ■• •'' ,..,. • ',7";-•• 2 1 - • , . `N• - • -..• 1 .. ' - ‘ ---:, . • -3 • ...-,,, • c;) . t, • ,, .., ,. ,„. : ..144.4t,• M6 .4■1 "•,.4104• .... , .. '... •• 4 . 4 •• •-1-''''. CO .. . . .... , • ,.. ,•••■ .4 CD `• I C '?"`",.. "• -1 • ' CO ``14■; 0 CD 73 .C -, (C) = ...• 0 ‘. 1 0 T-- 4— - , ' It a) •. z cn = ... 0.. o < _c • --444b.iil- , I — 0 ' o_ . < n NO ..-, I ce c a) MIN . ..... CD CD a) . 1 u,), • • cu O A -o z • , -5, 5 g ..,,.. ..., o SR , 0 4— I : . Ce) , . C-33 • .., . - , . — . ,' . s'.... . . .. . . . .. .N; • '' - - •T' ,.-..... ,,, . . .: - , '..•,- "••• ', • ......, . s .s. • • ' . . . ., • . .--...,.= .7 .., ....-- - 4' f• •-; Illalailfaillatiffilammillifleiliffrnigimailakiliallaillaillia' . - • • 1a., AliriiiiNgatiattailriiiii l t-• --v.v. .• . ..-- 4-- . CD CO ° .. g -I-, .-.. 03 CD C L._ 4—, cp. c) WI - •••••.1 af f • • ^-.• I .. - .• .. ......- r _ _____ ., , _ co ! C x .. , , . c). 0 ,,CD CD • . .' 1 w ___ .. x-- ., 0 s- . ,o.,-,1 ...efs/.■ 1 ,, .. - -■P o,1 / CD 0 0 • .• ';', 1 - . ' . T— — _i__ -0 C3 C • .,- I litig 4,.. * u) cic3 a) >, ,_ T . ...., .,...., z - - -.. ,I' , . - a.. . . , L., • —a .k ' • . ...• - . ... . c cf, . • I . ,. . •Y -a cn 0 'I. . . a 0 0 W C c 1... •-- . p,4 ■ ,' * . w 1 0 ... •0. .....03 ‘-- ,.,?- ,,..-- cE ..c "C3 F...., ,,11•.. : : C Z i—,,L1 co ..,,,•"...: ... Et LI 1- I < w • E§ (13 4-, . 0 C . .---- 1 I i t tt • (D I , E(0 1) ,.. -. 5 1\ 1 0 CD CD 0 l' 4. I, •- 4...1 U) ..-=•• 'r 1 I# ; t • 1110 • . i .-.,-, ..C" - • - mr.i. .0 ,0 0 D ti"--.!- , 1 „ . . - .,. . ' • • , h. , '... . • .4 / . '. • I ;,, ,:,• . . ,!0. ,r- I., C 34 • : t . 0 r ' t - . J 4; ... . '.1. - - '-'. . . . , . e -\ 4. . f r j• . v . r'. y W • • • •• •`• CIO • • o " a � `' N--- T a • • �' .e C-) i , • 4. • • • • 1— i : V Cfl Z a- a.) _.c i a.) Q a, oo ii.. - '��' •x Q °o O 0 0 w IIa) •E i- '^ Q .. • v 3 ,•i I -..�f U o z kis, -c cn a• . , . . I t -", 4.\',.',4 441,\.;,'` -\% .4 lit, , AA, C-35 0 . In ,....1.,.04,..4,..:, : . . . ' . .. * - • ..00",,, 140 '0111H f • . r• !d, ;fy ti � �.4 1 � �r N . .r el.to lit. '1. ti�G 0. .-_ , � � gym.�• t 1 ,r. ._ "I_ �,.sn C >i Y -* * -t s • f• 1;•W_ 1 3 < -� •'•et,, •,• i lig ',„1 'Ili 1.i.t. t le'?'. ' ....._,- ..._, ^ la i '~ � - t e d r a :e �• , � p� , •: c4"1 i e• • • • c rz , ' f r. I " ' . • le t 4 , yr' ' 1. ./. 4- t a -, t.-. .i !' �' + i * • . . .-- (1)( ', ._ • _ A %., . •••• .:,- - •-.- -• • ', • , .-, 4 • -- itli I 4,1111 itt, tr.1.,..:, , i . . .. sks‘or ; . 04. „t,... s - ' ' 't:''4- -•-0'; ' ' :.*;'. . . 4 I. - - i : . . 90931 ' '"''''''' •II " ' ki A,401 I 2.6r L..,. . Ir. Vd: *J... - Okla;■- r t �y {•. .. F'.t •i #r ,� • ,` r • :•.: • 0 • - i •fi:4 r t _ ' 't, iill:*�fc�!f lilisid• e Rd• • '. i EXHIBITD C-36 11/10110 RESOLUTION NO. 12-39 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF TRAIL ABANDONMENT DRC2009-00848, A REQUEST TO ABANDON TWO PORTIONS OF A LOCAL FEEDER TRAIL THAT LEAD FROM THE TRAIL BETWEEN RESIDENCES ONTO RANCH GATE ROAD IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. THE TWO PORTIONS OF THE TRAIL ARE LOCATED BETWEEN 5272 AND 5278 RANCH GATE ROAD AND ONE COMPLETELY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 5340 RANCH GATE ROAD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT OF - APN: 1061-021-02; 1061-021-03; 1061- 031-04. A. Recitals. 1. David Fajardo, on behalf of the property owners in Tract 9426, filed an application for the approval of Trail Abandonment DRC2009-00848, requesting to abandon two portions of a local feeder trail easement that leads from the trail between residences onto Ranch Gate Road, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Trail Abandonment is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 10th day of November 2009, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application which was continued to allow staff to obtain more information with respect to the cost of the proposed vacation. • 3. On the 22nd day of August 2012, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on August 22, 2012, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property within the City; and b. The proposed abandonment of the specified portions of the local feeder trail will not have a significant impact on the environment; and c. The Trails Implementation Plan that was adopted by Resolution 91-262 provides guidance for the vacation of trails. This trail was established under Tract Map 9426 that was approved under the County of San Bernardino; and • d. The proposed trail abandonment will be consistent with the provisions of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The trail abandonment of the two portions of the trail with the addition of the future connection to the regional trail will provide better access to parks, commercial sites, wildlife areas, and other community facilities by way of the trails system in the C-37 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-39 DRC2009-00848 - TRAIL ABANDONMENT— DAVID FARJARDO August 22, 2012 Page 2 • City. This provides a variety of ways to access these facilities either by hiking, bicycling, or riding thereby creating a Healthy RC. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed local trail abandonment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for the logical development of the surrounding area by vacating the two spurs that run through the residents' yards requiring that they be redirected through the flood control corridor; and b. The proposed trail abandonment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity because they have been closed off for many years and the requirement to connect the remaining trail in the future to the flood control corridor will connect this trail, to a regional multi-purpose trail; and c. The proposed trail abandonment is in conformance with the General Plan as it provides access to the regional trails by connecting the local trail to the regional multi-purpose trail. 4. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's • CEQA Guidelines, The project qualifies under the Class 5 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15305 Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations because the applicant is only abandoning two portions of a trail. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Trail Abandonment DRC2009-00848 by adoption of the attached City Council Resolution, as shown on Exhibit A attached. Planning Department: 1) Approval is for the abandonment of two portions of the local equestrian trail easement upon completion of all conditions. One section is located entirely on the property at 5340 Ranch Gate Road along the south property line, and the second section is split along the property line between 5272 and 5278 Ranch Gate Road. 2) Property owners shall be responsible for working with a Title Officer to process the paper work necessary for the County Recorder to remove the easement from their property title. 3) A recorded copy of the easement vacation(s) shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department. • C-38 • • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-39 DRC2009-00848 - TRAIL ABANDONMENT — DAVID FARJARDO August 22, 2012 • Page 3 4) The trail at the rear of the properties shall be graded and maintained in a usable condition per the Trail Implementation Plan design standards for local trails. The grading shall occur prior to the recordation of the Vacation. 5) All documents shall be reviewed by the Planning and Engineering Services Departments prior to submittal to the Title Company or County Recorders office. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF AUGUST 2012. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Frances Howdyshell, Chairman ATTEST: • Jeffrey A. Bloom, Secretary I, Jeffrey A. Bloom, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of August 2012, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • C 39 tt a� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: DRC2009-00848 SUBJECT: TRAIL ABANDONMENT APPLICANT: DAVID FAJARDO LOCATION: 5272, 5278 AND 5340 RANCH GATE ROAD-APN: 1061-021-02; 1061-021-03, 1061-031-04 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: is Completion Date General Requirements 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents,officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval,or in the alternative,to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may,at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The / /_ project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Notice of Exemption -$50 X B. Site Development 1. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon,all Conditions _/ / of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 2. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code,all _/ /_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. • C-40 1 • RESOLUTION NO. • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRAIL ABANDONMENT DRC2009-00848, A REQUEST TO ABANDON TWO PORTIONS OF A LOCAL FEEDER TRAIL THAT LEADS FROM THE TRAIL BETWEEN RESIDENCES ONTO RANCH GATE ROAD IN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. THE TWO PORTIONS OF TRAIL ARE LOCATED BETWEEN 5272 AND 5278 RANCH GATE ROAD AND ONE COMPLETELY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 5340 RANCH GATE ROAD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT OF -APN: 1061-021-02; 1061-021-03; 1061-031- 04. A. Recitals. 1. David Fajardo, on behalf of the property owners in Tract 9426, filed an application for Trail Abandonment DRC2009-00848, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Trail Abandonment is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 10th day November, 2010, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application DRC2009-00848 and continued the application to allow staff to obtain more information on the requirements and cost of the trail vacation. issued Resolution No. 10-55, recommending the City Council approve the above listed application. • 3. On the 22nd day August, 2012, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application DRC2009-00848 and issued Resolution No. 12-39, recommending the City Council approve the above listed application. 4. On the nth day of "`*t 2012, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on this application and concluded said hearing on that date. 5. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. • 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced meeting on j 2012, including written and oral staff reports, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The affected trails located within the Very Low (VL) Residential District near the northwest corner of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. One section of the private local equestrian trail is along the south property line of the property at 5340 Ranch Gate Road, and the second • section is split down the middle of the property line between 5272 and 5278 Ranch Gate Road; and C41 • CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO! DRC2009-00848 —TRAIL ABANDONMENT— DAVID FARJARDO Date' Page 2 b. The Trails Implementation Plan that was adopted by Resolution 91-262 provides guidance for the vacation of trails. This trail was established under Tract Map 9426 that was approved under the County of San Bernardino; and c. The project site is currently zoned Very Low(VL) Residential and is bound on the north and west side by the flood control corridor; on the south by single-family residences; and the Southern California Edison corridor to the east. The trail at the rear of the properties will be required to connect to the flood control corridor to provide continuous access to the trail system. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed local trail abandonment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for the logical development of the surrounding area by vacating the two spurs that run through the residence yards and requiring that the trail be redirected through the flood control corridor in the future; and b. The proposed trail abandonment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity because they have been closed off for many years, and the requirement to connect the remaining trail to the flood control corridor in the future will connect this trail to a regional multi-purpose trail. This requirement also satisfies the General Design Guidelines in the Development Code which requests that the local • feeder trails provide public access to regional trails within subdivisions; and c. The proposed trail abandonment is in conformance with the General Plan and Development Code as it provides access to the regional trails by connecting the local trail to the regional multi-purpose trail. 4. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under the Class 5 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15305 Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations because the applicant is only abandoning two portions of a trail. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The City Council has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4, above, this City Council hereby approves Trail Abandonment DRC2009-00848 by adoption of this Resolution subject to each of the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference: PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1) Approval is for the abandonment of two portions of the local equestrian trail easement upon completion of all conditions. One section is located entirely on the property at 5340 Ranch Gate Road along the • south property line, and the second section is split along the property line between 5272 and 5278 Ranch Gate Road. C42 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NOP DRC2009-00848 —TRAIL ABANDONMENT— DAVID FARJARDO • Date Page 3 2) Property owners shall be responsible for working with a Title Officer to process the paper work necessary for the County Recorder to remove the easement from their property title. 3) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents,officers,or employees, for any court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 4) A recorded copy of the easement vacation(s)shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department. 5) The trail at the rear of the properties shall be graded and maintained in a usable condition per the Trail Implementation Plan design standards for local trails. • 6) All documents shall be reviewed by the Planning and Engineering Services Departments prior to submittal to the Title Company or County Recorders office. 7) The applicant shall be required to pay the following fee: Notice of Exemption - $50. 6. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. • C43 STAFF REPORT y' • PLANNING DEPARTMENT L DATE: August 22, 2012 RANCHO TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission C,UCAMONGA . FROM: Jeffrey A. Bloom, Interim Planning Director BY: Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary SUBJECT: REVIEW OF AN UPDATE TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Commissioners consider updating its Administrative Regulations. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission Administrative Regulations were first adopted by the City Council in 1979 (Exhibit A). They were amended twice in 1988 and 1993, and various other policies have been implemented from time to time. Given the length of time since they were last reviewed, staff believes it would be appropriate for the Commission to revisit them and update them as the Commission deems necessary and convenient. The draft Planning Commission and Historic Preservation Commission Guidelines (Exhibit B) was prepared for the Commission's review and discussion with the following goals in mind. Streamlining meetings and procedural rules. The draft guidelines are much more streamlined than • the current regulations. For example, they abandon the reference to Robert's Rules of Order, which the City Attorney has advised are often inappropriate for managing Commission business, in favor of allowing the Chair to rule on points of order subject to appeal to the entire Commission. This is more consistent with the Commission's actual practice. They also allow the Planning Commission and Historic Preservation Commission to meet concurrently rather than consecutively as they do now. This would save time now devoted to opening and closing each separate meeting, and would be consistent with the practice of the City Council, Fire Protection District, and Public Financing Authority. Staff also proposes to remove the expressed requirement of a roll-call vote for adoption of all resolutions since the Commission now regularly uses electronic voting to record individual votes. Clean-up and Update. The draft guidelines update and clean up much of the outdated terminology in the existing regulations. For example, the current document refers to the "City Planner" and "Deputy City Planner" which are positions that have been either renamed or eliminated. The draft guidelines also omit many of the procedures and rules that are redundant of State law, such as agenda posting requirements and conflict of interest rules. New Agenda Format. The draft guidelines would change the order of business on the Commission's agenda to accommodate opening the Historic Preservation Commission meeting concurrent with the Planning Commission meeting and make greater use of the consent calendar. Public communications would also be moved to earlier in the agenda to accommodate the requirements of the Brown Act. Minutes. The draft guidelines would revise the rules related to the preparation of minutes. Current rules essentially require preparation of bare-bones action minutes, which is at odds with previously expressed preferences of some members of the City Council for a fuller written record of Planning Commission deliberations. The new rules are essentially silent on the matter to allow for flexibility and the best use of • staff time in the future. ITEM D PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT REVIEW OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS August 22, 2012 • Page 2 Chair Term Limits. The draft guidelines propose a rule that no Commission shall serve more than three consecutive one-year terms. The issue of whether a Commissioner should be allowed to serve longer has arisen before, so staff thought it best to put the matter before the Commission for consideration as part of the revised regulations. Absences. The draft guidelines omit the current rules related to Commissioner absences, which have long gone un-practiced without any noticeable problems. Should the Commission wish to continue with the current rules, they can be added to the draft guidelines. CONCLUSION: Staff concludes that the current Planning Commission Regulations are in need of an update. Staff encourages the Commission to thoroughly review and discuss the topics presented by staff and to adopt the new updated Regulations Respectfully submitted, effr-y =loom Interim Planning Director JAB:LS • Attachments: Exhibit A Current Planning Commission Administrative Regulations Exhibit B Draft revised Planning Commission and Historic Preservation Commission Guidelines • • D-2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION • ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS CHAPTER 1 A. Election and Term of Office 1 . The Planning Commission shall elect a Chairman and Vice-Chairman from its appointed members for a term of one year, at the first regular meeting in July of each year. 2. The Chairman and the Vice-Chairman shall hold office for one year and thereafter until their successors are elected. In case of any vacancy in office, the vacancy shall be filled by an election held at the first regular meeting after the occurrence of such vacancy. • B. Duties of Officers and Staff 1 . Chairman - The Chairman shall preside at all meetings of the Commission and shall appoint all committees and shall perform all other duties necessary, customary or incidental to the office. 2. Vice-Chairman - The Vice-Chairman, in the Chairman's absence or inability to act, shall take the place and perform all duties of the Chairman. In the event of absence or inability to act by both the Chairman and Vice-Chairman, the remaining members of the Commission shall elect one of their members to act as temporary Chairman. 3. Secretary - The City Planner shall provide technical advice to the Planning Commission, shall assist the Commission in the discharge of their responsibilities and shall maintain minutes of the meetings and records of hearings and official actions. • �/�J -1- EXHIBIT /�IBIT A D-3 4. Deputy Secretary - The Deputy City Planner shall serve • as the Deputy Secretary to the Planning Commission, and shall perform all the duties and have all the authority of the Secretary in the Secretary's absence or inability to act. • C Meetings 1 . Regular Meetings - Regular meetings of the Commission shall be open to the public and shall be held on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the City. If the regular meeting day falls on a legal holiday, the Commission or the Secretary may fix another day thereafter. Any regular meeting of the Planning Commission may be adjourned to another place and time certain within the City. 2. Special Meetings - Special meetings and study sessions shall be open to the public and shall be held at such time and place as the Commission may determine or they may • be called by the Chairman or majority of the members of the Planning Commission upon 24 hours notice pursuant to the Government Code. The Secretary shall be responsible for giving any necessary notice of such special meetings as prescribed by law. D. Agendas for Meetings 1 . Provision should be made for the preparation of agendas. Copies of the prepared agenda should be made available to members of the public attending the regular Commission meeting by placing same near the entrance of the place of the meeting. No matter other than those on the agenda should be acted upon by the Planning Commission, absent urgent or emergency action taken in compliance with Government Code. -2- • D-4 2. A copy of the agenda for every regular meeting of the • Planning Commission shall be posted in compliance with Government Code and provided to each member no later than 72 hours prior to the date of the meeting at which such agenda is to be considered. 3. It shall be the right of any Planning Commissioner to place any item on the agenda provided such item is added at least ten (10) days prior to the meeting in which it is considered, except for public hearing items. In the case of public hearing, items requested by a Planning Commissioner, a request must be considered by the Planning Commission as a whole prior to scheduling. E Order of Business 1 . The order of business at any regular meeting shall be as follows: a. Meeting called to order b. Pledge of Allegiance • c. Roll Call d. Approval of minutes e. Announcements f. Consent Calendar g. Public Hearings h. Old Business i. New Business k. Director's Reports 1. Public Comment m. Commission Business n. Adjournment F. Quorum 1 . A quorum shall be three members present. -3- • D-5 G. Voting • 1 . A tie vote on any motion shall be construed as follows: a. On any matter where the Planning Commission is acting in an advisory body on a legislative action (i.e., General Plan or Development District Amendment, et. seq.), the action shall be forwarded to the City Council with no recommendation. b. On any matter where the mandatory time for a decision on an application (California Government Code Sections 65950 et seq., 66452.1, et seq.) will expire prior to the next regular meeting, the application shall be deemed denied, without prejudice. c. On any matter not in jeopardy of such mandatory decision time periods, the motion shall be deemed a nullity and the item shall be open for a new motion which will not result in a tie vote or a motion to continue the item. • 2. In the event any Planning Commission votes in the minority of any item coming before the Planning Commission, it shall be the policy that such Planning Commissioner state the reason for the minority so that said reason may be recorded in the minutes. 3. Every official act taken by the Commission shall be adopted by a majority of the Commission or quorum present. 4. A roll call vote shall be taken upon the passage of all resolutions or upon request of any Planning Commission members. EL Time Limit 1 . No matter shall be commenced after 11:00 p.m. except by majority vote of the Planning Commissioners present. • -4- D-6 Rules of Order for Conduct of Proceedings • 1 . The Chairman of the Planning Commission shall be the presiding officer and shall assume all duties as such immediately following election. The Chairman shall preserve strict order and decorum at all meetings of the Planning Commission, state questions coming before the Planning Commission, announce its decisions on all subjects and decide all questions of order; subject, however, to an appeal to the Planning Commission as a whole in which event a majority vote of the Planning Commission members shall govern and conclusively determine such question of order. The Chairman shall vote on all questions. 2. In the absence of the Chairman, the Vice-Chairman shall call the Planning Commission to order. In the absence of the Chairman and Vice-Chairman, the Secretary of the Planning Commission shall call the Planning Commission to order, whereupon a temporary Chairman shall be elected by the Planning Commissioners present. Upon • arrival of the Chairman or Vice-Chairman, the temporary Chairman shall relinquish the chair at the conclusion of the item before the Planning Commission. J. Preparation of Minutes 1 . The minutes of the Planning Commission shall be kept by the Secretary of the Planning Commission and shall be neatly type-written in a book kept for that purpose, with a record of each particular type of business transaction set off in paragraphs, with proper subheads; provided, that the Secretary of the Planning Commission shall be required to make a record only of such business that was actually passed by a vote of the Planning Commission, and shall not be required to record any remarks of Commissioners or of any other person, except at special request of a Commissioner; provided, further that a record shall be made of the names and addresses of persons addressing the Planning Commission, the title of the subject matter to which the remarks are related, and • whether they spoke in support of or in opposition to such matter. 5 D-7 2. As soon as possible after each Planning Commission • meeting, the Secretary of the Planning Commission shall cause a copy of the minutes thereof to be forwarded to each Commissioner, the City Manager, the City Council, the City Attorney and the department heads. K Approval of Minutes 1. Unless the reading of the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting is requested by a Commissioner and approved by a majority vote, such minutes may be approved without reading if the Secretary of the Planning Commission previously has furnished each Commissioner with a copy thereof. Nothing may be added to the minutes, except that they may be amended by a majority vote of the Planning Commission members to reflect correctly the business of the Planning Commission at such meeting. L. Rules of Debate 1 . Presiding officer may debate and vote. The presiding • officer may move, second and debate from the chair, subject only to such limitations of debate as are by these rules imposed on all Commissioners, and shall not be deprived of any of the rights and privileges of a Commissioner by reason of acting as the presiding officer. 2. Getting the floor: improper references to be avoided. • Every Commissioner desiring to speak shall address the chair, and upon recognition by the presiding officer, shall confine himself to the question under debate, avoiding all personalities and indecorous language. 3. Interruptions. A Commissioner, once recognized, shall not be interrupted when speaking unless it is to call to order or as herein otherwise provided. If a Commissoner, while speaking, is called to order, the Commissioner shall cease speaking until the question of order is determined, and if in order, shall be permitted to proceed. • -6- D-8 5. Disqualifications and abstention. No Planning Commissioner ,• shall be permitted to disqualify or abstain from voting unless reason for such disqualification is stated. Disqualifications and abstentions shall not be counted by the Secretary of the Planning Commission except as such. 6. Silence constitutes affirmative vote. Unless a Commissioner states a reason for not voting, silence shall be recorded as an affirmative vote. 7. Rules of Order. Except as otherwise provided in this Resolution, the latest edition of "Robert's Rules of Order, Revised" shall govern the conduct of the meetings of the Planning Commission. However, no resolution, proceeding or other action of the Planning Commission shall be invalidated, or the legality thereof otherwise affected, by the failure or omission to observe or follow such rules. It is the responsibility of the Chair to control public debate so that repetitive or irrelevant remarks are not made; so that everyone has had a chance to speak before • others speak for a second time, and so as to expedite the business at hand. No person shall speak more than twice during the same meeting to the same question, nor longer than five (5) minutes at one time, without leave of the Chairman or Commissioner presiding at the meeting. Whenever any group of persons wishes to address the Planning Commission on the same subject matter, it shall be proper for the presiding officer to request that a spokesman be chosen by the group to address the Planning Commission, and in case additional matters are to be presented at the time by any other member of said group, to limit the number of persons addressing the Planning Commission to avoid unnecessary repetitions. M. Decorum 1 . By Commission Members . While the Planning Commission is in session, the members shall preserve order and decorum, and a member shall neither by conversation or otherwise, delay or interrupt the • proceedings or the peace of the Planning Commission, not -7- D-9 disturb any member while speaking or refuse to obey the orders of the Planning Commission or the presiding officer, except as otherwise herein provided. 2. By other persons. Any person, while in attendance at any Planning Commission meeting, shall preserve order and decorum, and any person shall neither by conversation or otherwise delay or interrupt the Planning Commission proceedings or the peace of the Planning Commission. No person shall disturb any Planning Commission member while speaking or refuse to obey the orders of the Planning Commission or the presiding officer. N. Motion to Adjourn 1. A motion to adjourn shall always be in order, and shall be decided without debate. 0. Planning Commission Policies 1. Publicity . The Secretary shall release all official information or stories to the press at the approval of the • City Manager. Copies of all publicity items shall be distributed to the Commission for their review and information. 2. Attendance. Each Commission member shall attend every regular or special meeting unless unavailable with prior notice being provided to the Chairman of the Commission or the Secretary. The Commission may excuse members if prior notice is given to the Chairman and/or Secretary. In such an instance, the absence of a Commission member shall be recorded in the minutes and be classified as being excused if prior notice has been given. A maximum of seven (7) absences (excused or unexcused) accumulated during any year beginning July 1 and ending June 30, or a maximum of three (3) unexcused absences during any year beginning July 1 and ending June 30 shall cause the Planning Commission to declare the seat vacant and cause the Planning Commission to recommend that the City Council remove • said Commissioner. -8- D-10 • Special meetings called in the absence of a Planning Commissioner, _whether said absence is excused or unexcused, shall not be counted against said Commissioner. 3 . Conflict of Interest. Any Planning Commissioner who has had a direct or indirect financial interest in any matter before the Commission shall publicly disclose for the official record the nature of such interest and such Commissioner shall not participate in any discussion on the matter nor vote thereon. 4. Additional Policies. Additional policies are as filed in the office of the Community Development Department. P. Amendments These rules and regulations may be amended by the Commission at any regular meeting by an affirmative vote of the members of the Commission or at any special • meeting provided that the proposed amendment is included in a written notice of such a meeting.. • -9- D-11 • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION GUIDELINES 1. Purpose: These guidelines are intended to help the Planning Commission, the Historic Preservation Commission (collectively "Commission"), and staff function more efficiently and effectively and are designed to comply with the Municipal Code and applicable State law, including the Ralph M. Brown Act. 2. Election and Duties of Officers: The Commission shall elect a Chair and a Vice-Chair from its appointed members, who shall serve for a term of one year and until their successors are elected. The Chair and Vice-Chair of the Planning Commission shall also serve as the respective Chair and Vice-Chair of the Historic Preservation Commission. No Commissioner shall serve as Chair for more than three consecutive terms. Elections shall occur at the first regular Commission meeting in July of each year, or as soon thereafter as is practical. Any vacancy shall be filled by an election held at the first regular meeting after the occurrence of the vacancy. • The Chair shall preside at all meetings of the Commission and may move, second, and debate from the chair in the same manner as all other Commissioners. The Vice-Chair shall act as the Chair in the Chair's absence. In the event of absence of both the Chair and Vice-Chair, the remaining members of the Commission shall elect a temporary Chair from among the remaining members. 3. Meetings: Regular meetings of the Commission shall be held the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 7:00 p.m., unless modified by City Council action. Meetings of the Planning Commission may be held concurrently. The Commission may call Special meetings as necessary, consistent with the noticing requirements of the Ralph M. Brown Act. 4. Minutes The Planning Director shall be responsible for preparing the minutes of each Commission Meeting. Approval of the minutes may occur as part of the Commission's consent calendar. A Commissioner may abstain from voting on the approval of minutes for meetings for which he or she is absent. • EXHIBIT B 1 D-12 5. Order of the Agenda: • Matters shall be heard in the order printed on the agenda, provided that the Chair may reorder the agenda if it determines that it is in the public interest to do so. The standard agenda format is as follows: • Pledge of Allegiance • Roll Call • Public Communications • Consent Calendar/Historic Preservation Commission • Consent Calendar/Planning Commission • Scheduled Matters/Historic Preservation Commission • Scheduled Matters/Planning Commission • Public Hearings/Historic Preservation Commission • Public Hearings/Planning Commission • Director's Reports • Commission Concerns • Adjournment 6. Setting the Agenda: The Chair shall work with the Development Services Director to set the • Commission agenda. Any Commissioner may request an item be placed on an upcoming agenda with the Chair's concurrence. Staff shall schedule matters pursuant to the requirements and timeframes of the Municipal Code and all other legal requirements. 7. Voting: Each Commissioner who is present at a meeting shall vote on all agenda items unless he or she has a conflict of interest. Unless a Commissioner states a reason for not voting, failure to vote shall be recorded as an affirmative vote. A tie vote on any motion shall be construed as follows: A. On any matter where the Commission is acting in an advisory capacity on a legislative action (i.e., General Plan, Specific Plan, etc.) the action shall be forwarded to the City Council with no recommendation. B. On any other matter, including where the Commission is acting in a quasi- judicial capacity on a discretionary action (La, conditional use permit, variance, etc.), the motion shall fail. • 2 D-13 • 8. Meeting Time Limits: The Commission shall not consider any new agenda item after 11:00 p.m. No later than 10:45 p.m., the Commission shall vote on whether to continue the meeting until the remaining agenda items are resolved or to a future date. The Commission shall adjourn all meetings no later than 11:59 p.m. on the date the meeting started. The Commission may waive or modify these time limits by majority vote. 9. Rules of Order: A. The Chair shall preserve order and decorum at all meetings, state questions coming before the Commission, announce its decisions on all subjects, and rule on all points of order. Any Commissioner may appeal the rulings of the Chair on points or order to the entire Commission. Such appeals shall be decided by a majority vote of the Commission. B. All persons in attendance at a Commission meeting, including Commissioners, shall preserve the order and decorum of the meeting and shall neither by conversation or otherwise, delay or interrupt the orderly and peaceful proceedings of the meeting. • C. The Chair may establish such rules as are necessary to control public debate to avoid irrelevant or repetitive remarks. No member of the public shall speak more than once during the same meeting as to the same question, nor longer than 5 minutes at a time without leave of the Chair. The Chair may establish a shorter time period for speakers if announced before the beginning of the agenda item or public hearing thereon. D. A motion to adjourn shall always be in order and shall be decided without debate. 10. Absences: Every Commissioner shall attend every regular or special meeting of the Commission unless otherwise unavailable. As soon as any Commissioner has reason to believe that he or she will not be able to attend a meeting, the Commissioner shall notify the Planning Director of the anticipated absence. 11. Planning Commission Information Requests: Commissioners may from time to time seek information about general issues within the community. Staff shall follow-up and provide information to the Planning Commission in order to keep it informed. This may be done outside a • Planning Commission meeting and should not be construed as the Planning Commission directing the work of staff. 3 D-14 12. Conflicts of Interests: • It is the responsibility of each Planning Commissioner to know and understand the conflict of interest rules. Whenever a Commissioner has reason to believe he or she has a conflict of interest involving any item on a Commission agenda, the Commissioner shall, to the extent, possible notify the Planning Director and the City Attorney in advance of the meeting. • • 4 D-15 ?cco 60,5 7"7"A,,,,„ ifforaatt THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA L1i d] MEETINGS OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION *******, 2012 Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Howdyshell _ Vice Chairman Fletcher Munoz_ Wimberly_ Oaxaca II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter fora subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. III. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Approval of minutes dated*** �cr�s. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION w AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA LS.M ****** 2012 RANCHO f CUCA-MONGA Page 2 IV. CONSENT CALENDAR/PLANNING COMMISSION I Approval of minutes dated*** V. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS/ HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION A. VI. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS/PLANNING COMMISSION I B. II. SCHEDULED MATTERS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION I C. (VIII. SCHEDULED MATTERS/PLANNING COMMISSION I D. IX. PUBLIC HEARINGS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project Please sign in after speaking. E. X. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their CAA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Vs-MJ I AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA L ****** 2012 RANCHO r CUCAMONGA Page 3 opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. F. XI. COMMISSION CONCERNS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION XII. ADJOURNMENT I I, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on ", 2012, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. giIf you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position,you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA I JUNE 13, 2012 RMcno Page 4 Pa jZANCeo 9 -CUCAMONGA- staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda,you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director, AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m.to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,216 for maps and $2,328 for all other decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us I:\PLANNING\FINAL\Lois\Commission Administrative Regs\Dummy testl0 HPC-PC BLANKagenda.doc Penn/Zee el, 5. Order of the Agenda: Matters shall be heard in the order printed on the agenda, provided that the Chair may reorder the agenda if it determines that it is in the public interest to do so. The standard agenda format is as follows: • Pledge of Allegiance • Roll Call • Public Communications • Consent Calendar/Historic Preservation Commission • Consent Calendar/Planning Commission • Director's Reports/Historic Preservation Commission • Director's Reports/Planning Commission • Scheduled Matters/Historic Preservation Commission • Scheduled Matters/Planning Commission • Public Hearings/Historic Preservation Commission • Public Hearings/Planning Commission • Commission Concerns • Adjournment 6. Setting the Agenda: The Chair shall work with the Development-Services Planning Director to set the Commission agenda. Any Commissioner may request an item be placed on an upcoming agenda with the Chair's concurrence. Staff shall schedule matters pursuant to the requirements and timeframes of the Municipal Code and all other legal requirements. 7. Voting: Each Commissioner who is present at a meeting shall vote on all agenda items unless he or she has a conflict of interest. Unless a Commissioner states a reason for not voting, failure to vote shall be recorded as an affirmative vote. A tie vote on any motion shall be construed as follows: A. On any matter where the Commission is acting in an advisory capacity on a legislative action (Le., General Plan, Specific Plan, etc.) the action shall be forwarded to the City Council with no recommendation. B. On any other matter, including where the Commission is acting in a quasi- judicial capacity on a discretionary action (Le., conditional use permit, variance, etc.), the motion shall fail. D-13 4 ill} }. Q e il /O i i _• �' W nC, , r NI CO CO C 0 o L N O N 0 0 CO - 0 CO Q 3 0 - Q o CO F- r‘147 ft r Yk llf / f1 !r/ 0 E co C w N a a E 1 Ca Q c 92 0 o o •- � o CO 0 0 c o 0 C.9 >, U U LL) U v o cco ct CO 2 LL I- O) I • • • • e 4 li IS e 1‘ , 4; .. �11i r ✓ .. t Ti �.(".' � +-^i C r •1" ` ! • ;`'..? .. 'r - --I..may s J 1. ■ ' `� _..1 it .w ..; TIt. 1 P"'_.r.�.,..r. y:� It :'r ■ arJ � LR t • •. rieti, .. ' e a A Tuayuuise rF 1 _ A. eF' -`Ai,..^.� .. w07"'"77,!^^0--, .r++R,� ,,. Turqu�•te',' r a c„-Y. • 4 • +•r+ dMC �yyryy, .rl/>t ..,(aQ`,eKW _ v Ra et. Gaie Rd .2,--72, " ,"r , ::&75 - —,r, ' ;7-T, .,,i'''' . - - , , it ''' •ft,/ • •. - c' Hulaide,Rd '~ a, \ , et '- _ � `^.. �• • try ' ■ t �, xilipso , R ' , 470-1 i __. ' `4 :I: di, fft / / / /' l o O 1 C CD N W C 0 O O N•cp. - X > O > E N o co O a E Q a) Ct C — V 0.• 0{ > • N CO -1->1 +. L wimml 0 O ct co P4 co c) ...-S a) c 0, L Ca CO (0 Co }, p U U L U L O > .Q O- H m CO O Q Q (# C • • • • 6' y / / , / . I / i• ; . . c.,t1\81 ' 1 !Ili ; !;•I:: U ■I 11 ; 2"{ esEe HI 11.1 li V el■ I 1 I > ■ 3- ri 4 I p Iltflin I . p, ; I 1 i o y ‘ - ms,..,, SN eese hist 1 01 ;11 t. 1 . ; 1;1 '') \ III in a; In,ki pi IC 1 - heave, ; _ ; ; Itic• ;*11:1 H • 0 -,:, ,0 N i i ti \ ) ( .--4, N (•'? 1rit...•.ar. " ,,,r, ;a A: ..v.:,\ . q it, 11 1/4./.10,11 : 11,../..?, vti\ 1, tilTh • i :ItI i : 01 g v is; '11 01 a0 ! rii. "4{11 "1” I IQ: \\ s J-., +,it z_ —, iio i: , . 0 ..... 1 i 1. FA__ ..•. - .i., _ ,,._ ,At f ----- —I-- —_ 19 t i Se,‘ ,;.-4, 1•0. ! 1.: - • IOW V.----• -4-::'55r• ....1 t ‘11 ' I th...,-.1 ;r: ..;: ...rT 1 • H ,1:0 R.; "--,_ ii., 'I,.:P1/4, . .i 4' t . :. A t:- IL ' o; j !. 1;1 j e Z. "--I--4 i; t.:t` ,, ik■ ji 0 ; - fi si i 1' " --: ---- — . ' r ' 0 1 O :,i;i?V1 I L‘.1_ 1 .• -: - - .- -$ -- V .1•-•'-g,.. ,;.4..„:.;- • 1 . • p < 14 -__•„::::Fs,...: ,..„,.. ,-„,,, !i‘1 .1 I' H = ! 1 y } - _, _kr, _ ; t, ..: 5 uo ii, oi3i i• 0,- ,1 , ,I: ! ifgli ;?4 Al.fi I tn. i 12'11" iil! O1; Zit! ”.•lii 1001! :16 i' li ' f 01111/0iffl 141.1, i' -- --- Sa5 — 1.4 (...t1 tikiLL:24.Ey ... • -, .. . . ..• ' 'Afii. - '' 0,1 k . 9 / ..... .,-- - . • t17, . — z 9 / cc . Csi .. CD , 0 , . , A• A , f..c..'. A..■ a- ik. . . . .• , • ,. . • „ . , .. . . O. . . .■ ,,,.;..;!-:--.- 7'...A i.V'V> • ;. .p"-'. • 4 p 4... .:. 40, .-. • ; ri ', `,.., cn ...' P ' :,...0:jiii-...t, 4*- • . : I . (.9 9 1.,-• :•:: .• 1- :/ — .,. •,...,- ; , 4....., ;X:i.e" •-•:---- • .$213, cs, • , , !MO - iv. ;_-•:..,,.,...'- ' --__I. • 1., 7•-•-•-•—•-.,..13.- .. ... ........ . _ . . .. ; ., !. CN - •-,/,' ----••'' •• .- .-''''',''6.•' - ' i 0 .•-• , - . •••.,...■ ' ' • ' . .. " .- ,. . .- .•• ■C Cl- < : . ' ••••'`..] 4,:'• ! ,. . • 0 - p .!I; ... . i•'':•`'• .w.,',") - o•''••`•- • '. . . ./ . C , ,., CI CS • '', .. . . ' -.1.,. • Al", , ' \\ , .::: ' ' • el -I' 1' 1112 ? ,,, ......::',,,, .•.,;.. ' : . , ' 1 CO ii.... r 11 1 ,.....,. _ A 10 cr .2-N "1' 44 ••14":'• ii,,i•- N . 0 CV La Z •*k. :45i>1174 8 - ,-, - u_ 0 "N-0„•,- .-)• CO • 0 !--- - (.0(..) .,' .-Ar.:'' • . ■ If) 1 z a_ , .• ' :,:: ,41Ir -IC' elk' ,.-, • r :c., •-•41.;*,• , - si..,-,--•.1: , ,,,.• -• •• . , . • ...,.. . • . Dos •... . 0 Ct .• •k.,, •4"'",^4,:i.A6..,br..kto • C\1 9 , u- 0 • . . . * .•_. . .• •• :-..., -VP 1 . • •"• ' ‘4'''•;41 -1: • i ' \ I I -1 • 1 ■ 4 ,1 „ ... ''.`:;.'•,, 1 . v) ... . ... . A 1 A. - - Z . ., .. _._ .-..., r 0 ,, .. ' 4 a \ L)j .1 • co , I 8 1 li 'il co 1 z‘- o_ - I 1 1• 111114 le 11110101 - •. S.'- < - 'I 04 . ..... i '.. i .'4::'' .101111'AL. 1/7 • /. 1 f, ;',,/ r i ` ,.1 CO A 0 f A. V . e co N _ (D f O a Z CD _ Q f) CD • W W _ W LL it z J LL • y . • B F MJ—/ it 3 ., 441 /14 )1PIP.0. 4 , vt, lift T ._ • • -,'.. .....- '4'!14 ',...,:e•'-4'e4:p.. .-.);;'...,•.•‘• •-•:',...1,,,,',0-',-", 7• /Inkti,i •no.n!-:::,,s, .1.%"ntk.2"ns,,:'",,,410,.. .- ., ;.-..„,.• ,-:,-.1„,.• , .,t1-1000,..4.,4.45t 7 .. • . ‘.,y,...:.,.:2• .4' ,_4 ''''''. ,,, ;'' ,, `'!,..;.... . LO S c7) N- .t, • 0 -r ... , =• t o) c:, Q., t . .4- a— n.— ...,.•.. cv -a-5,) .73 _ . a) , , c ,, C. 0 Q.) (I) - a) .,- - -, 0 cL. 4.) s •-- iiii .,..,. „., ■41•■•° :7--, 1-,--; -. -0 -,,„ . . liv...f.. E,_ . . .• , • • 7 i • • 0 0 (7, , -, ,., ! , • (.9 O Ez .,,, , Lt a) .. -7 • <• 2 3 E z ',,,,.. • ' • ■C • 3 ``) -z CC• r.3 • C) C•1 0 '1 ''. , 1 . • C , '4 Co IF • 0. 11 • „il .: , CD . ; ,. . .•,, '4, 'A...t.h, ' 41" 1111111.1111111 ,d----- ' • . ,' . - . ,..• — . ...,.,. • . . ,.„ Lt) co AIL . .. i. 4:t •-.",. w - ''. , • Z ., '; P • ... ::i.. r, e411°--°- , di* ,• a , (i I- ( - ../ 5 o a) ,, ,... ,„ OP •r • ...., LT, 2 ..„ \ \ t' • ;ti: r. lf / :wt.. „s 3 . • I 1 ,k1 ti ,�y t- ` !. r n 9 '@ t (I) !!o f S cp E Z a • Q C :r'- ,;.',• '•V rA a y . C1:15 •0 W E w, Q y C7 a) m = 3 p' U p .5 o U Aco• p C u) as •i.- C 0:13 Irk- 1\,`,\ • Ct . • . CO) .,.. ..,..v tr 2 a E. )\ . y t,0 p Ce) 71) co T 1� 3 2 y p m t a - T co 3 c .X o p p F2 ` T.) c a� � 4 a gg < O p ca• r. • yr ' 0 N Z "Cs M W E L C — m 'p � t C:N;:,,c- ,4, � cwt fill ' 0 t r` ; t a / /.. , 0 Q) CO r a ( 0 r 0 0 L L N a -I-0 LO = c C) . _ O O(D E Q E > E 'N^ LT E O a CVJ a D N O C a) U C a' L 0 .� n. a Cl) CO w E -0 0 0 a }+ C V) cn -0 L D � \-- c"d c i yr: ' t .1: 1/4'. '' • • • • ; N o 0 0 r • \ . .z 1•••// \ < / / 0) 2 f m �2 - / \ £ § J / o \ p / � § � k �aN a a q - o / % E $ � 0 • 7/ \ % a ® / 2 } O £ § - E £ U) t - E § n Ek Uo 0) Ook wk i o g c c co 0 w E t co ! 0 � � �D co / � E ° ° % f a co / � D � .1 2 $ @f � / % / � 0 Cr % � ° � � � ° C _ / f ,£ / aa ° ° ° o / c@mf 0- 7 ° 7 2 fZo I o § -0 ° 0_ m E £ o e = / _ c � 5fCn £ 2 o 7 � .- 'E '§ f .§ o § 2 e ' ® - o ° Qo73 � 20 3 § � a, � 2 � O a) -1-- u £ / Co • CO Q � 2 / @ CO ® C a) � E3 / / § ƒ 2 / q § S / Q � � § 2 ƒ/ � a2 � � S \ � § § . - 9 / 2 c ~ 2 f ) @O ® ELCV § 2 tai — : f CO / \ \ % > c cOc f E § f T3 ® 66 $ ° 0o al 9k k -0 0 CD 2 / = �3 >. c—Ot xEa .E � o_ @Eco P 'a n gmt c = .§ E � 'E ± U 2 / § ask / / § a) CO R / / / 0_ / 3m ° Q _ 02 '� � 2 zflhiu 2 / Dli > / (*I , 7 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 � - \ _. f. A. 1/ 7„), :,,, ,. ,,, N N r, c O c U N -0 O N -'-' C L C � � 'C O � O f E '`HOC � � C OC = •— i O C N = U O O ,. a) UNL a) cEcn 1 E oho � g o � � p CT LL 23c0 � a) 0co co > cn O C N ^♦ � C 00 0 — 0 .0 cL N - .- a ti '� < L capes 2 � � 0 O LL ,_ N O .,.,, N N r N 'c ° L (6aCD Uf L Ss- c A--+ C L O ' ' t O •- > E 4- O c ��O .O � 0 O `- 0 En -2 - - roc n O O C (a U ogN F .w_ ow o N U >+ C _ n N � C W � V o O E z_c_, � •(6 (� O Opp . C � - E ow _. E (nUC & C.) (6Qcn ` N W ---1 �„ ➢ tee_, �' s`' O 0 0 • m• 1! • ,_.., , k - .A\ -vw sistracl i 110 Nile.... i---Vhat , - 7 ?" , , OD or Vr.me z. , i i i''''1.. 7 Y e t..w.M i _ L-. ..-.—■■11141 ■ a Op I i 7.- o i ; . 111.1 s A, °-tip-� ; = e r.._. c tt 2 ° f iL., /1 • mini 2 _ AAA..r. M . •• y.... .N , i 17, g* 1110111156 LI ..a. T I1Ui z •••� ar . liml ae t _ • CO ....I M w�W — 1 q " . z- i1 O M. t0 IT Il i' iliP = , , 11 .., ... ..... , ..... C�n w. fff�! fir. J _ • �.. 1 . -0 ..., u ' ., ,' , mg ,--) .., ..._._ ._ _. 1 c, ,I `l a i i ®® c•0� t , u 1 1 . '4 7 ° ii S e SiiE1gl ! iI1!illIU IQ 1 d 8 t jec CI D a,l.fgith iql f: o. .• / 1. Z U no I 1'1' :f:• 1 c 000 a) _c -a 5 CE c- r � c N -0 OV � NO -oF- W O �(a NcoO tiril E U - ON ( L N �.. � -0 •- O +�W U � co (S E _ � OO �00 — UN _ OC (a 0 cran -0 -CO V 1- N -0 N 2_' w4- C L �N�/ 1 •- 0W > cn -a ,_ ut) Ca NkE � N 1 -0 o O "a N CO 1 0 � �flc N E c u o CO O00NOO aN ': .(OmE C _ O0LC � 0 c — C 0- -0 "0 a mo_ awcC OOLC t- (s. 0 1r d' • / / / 4- p / i .- • p U CO � �- a� 73 a) Co — 0 a) • C p c c .c E W .2 E ryi, E o U I'' o _ 0 V CD O -� Q �O L CO En t cwoaw ° UUSU • , I ry / 1 --- - I `- . • 1 4,� rll,y ti. t . „ 'e•• _ 1 t ! A• :.. Ir '..', . Y it t !1 .. t s a jar '• `i . u• , :'41�••(,�'..o.t, . 1* r { I I j v 1 A ki •• �, • yid;;?,' �� ` .z.• j; t'r y . � ,z ' • ' � �1 r • aI I.'' -• • a . ? ' • i •• . ' y. •( to Z: \ laa. .• is „, . .. yt. �, :�, ;ESA• � `� •.. . . . A\ vi� .lei .. �q y CO 1. -.71 ,,. V { C lr P o r. l "i. CO A=4 4. ..0 S ck: , LL ■Iir ,. ,,‘0 '- , 0) r: C • CZ o : ..i all) LIMO s.... E � .0N J Q � oo > co a� ""0 M a) oEt o E o }, o a5 CD coo E � N 0. N (1) � .— U oU .71, a) CIO p 0 > 0 ciF) 0 0 #6-1 0,,r, z (, ,,,,' Mot c 0 U a Aajfill i 4` ,,-.D' ci:A) 7r. - + �. - � .k„. , ",ra: i Pj, E . .„,,,,,,, ..„ , „. , , ', , , ,.,.x , .-,. ,, ,''.4 CI Pe i oN rt k ti ': a.) ,. ,.... ,... ...4, ) '., ,,r. )4,,<,,, .. > :.,.,,,.:....-:, , ..,,x -iF / }ii , , .......,.4.) k......, ,, .,,.. .,:.:;......„. .0,..,.4,2... ., : : ,..,,,.„..„,,...,. ,...,..„....4,..„,...c.„. ,.,.4_. , .,....,,,,,,.,l 1 P"VV..Ar,"..1-1;, @ \ � ? / O. `/ �,�<. fr Cl) !iL ,,../ 1` is •i J o C 06 N .o - co (!) C -o CO C a) 0 .0) a) of) 0) E CO D CO a) c — 0 •• E -0 u) o 1 ,�, c a) co o :;alo Co -i_' - 4) { - C� 0 D 441177...j , rig • F r Y�1 i , tr 1 F� ° ,.a . .r• (▪ r i 1 i r 41:: ._.d _ f 4.i .e., i VJ - ,,pc ..,,,.. CI 1 d . D E3 _ a * N 4i : • . , ,.,: . ... . F.i.a j�;' � . W.. W • .c s 9 1. CO? e AJf l �!, �' . (- _,0 P-----1 aill l ° 1, '� 1111 il: '( f• • -- - . 5.;' ..., p .,...., Az7"1..,:.'.4../ 7'4.., .7 lt1,:7.;. i'il_s. . .'..,,'..,.._-..'_'....,..._,. .,,,'...: :4119,',`..i- 1 '' , . 1..* , ., 4'- ' ., 44111k., .. 'Ihmallill ,,,., L1)(1; o nC W E CO 0_ co -1EI •__ 0) m -0 P. a) C c7 2 W -_ 0_ > o- u) — O co cl) a) . > N v a) I _ p 06 45 E .(1) a) a) C5 (1) c to -5 .— a) .- o - = " J - -0 -0 C _o (1) C C CO c . co 5 o — — —J w -- 2 }' en(I) :"-E3 a) co .(I) 2cCo > co o a) CO 4) lir.--1 0 z ,x � U) O 0 > fouro '44 ,,,,...01.___J Pi4: 3 • • • • ' '� } 7 a 1I ! Wa"i c 1i fib a �., , a•A'.,••7 4,- I it L V- �. -- r^ V-+mow I -— .y _ tP h f IE Z Z (1113 •III Q a � W 060 N 1: 11111 ! CL • DU°� G - I W .- OD J � �. '"% (a) 1 : -— " N Z J II fir` Z0 < �� i g 1 , a c W U U) I ' II: r 01U j i� IL 0 p r r , �, U f� I1 i i II , � i c G =Q ' I O . 411,.--1 c 4../ 4 . k . ,, -, -....i.,-.,_ ; Ts ' - , ,••;,\ 'mr.,4:,,s'•,-, s 1 Z 8 , .,,, ..k_.,:r„,,,,-.-:,. ....\,,,. .„,,,,,,.,.._ ,.0 \..,. I 1 -4,10/0 i \ in_ -,7c._ ___:,L-_----_--7---- kr,_ .14)11:41°-' Ile (4.1 ° : ___----- a ,—,col; rYc-. 0 'I AA 4Y PK rai rte. R II I L:-.•,_:i 2,i:"..:,_•..• t� • ® � F, Z ,,,;4<; z • 0 may;? 0 a i 1 ,,u u. 1 W It I r J Li "ff n A Q (In I in:iisoigmt � M W..� 4l � C Q W Z_ ■ aC o 1 J . ∎ WcJIU I CZ3 - .1.--) q � Z. WNQ � 2Ut6 , (1) , .. aaZ .� -.,F U O ■ dp U p W i'", ' i Les T U; Z W Inn II MO EIMIll....:;.';.-I" LL1 1 4 • IL I 11 111 W :i W iiiiiiiaiikkJ,_ i.- I 1:4 Itr° IS u j II 11 I• im il i 111,0211 OIL: .1 11=1111 own S �y S 1T i PK Pi :4111141k .1/0 .. 401._____I •A114 0-..D c..) „. r ;` 0 _ • 2 �: es 2 2 it:.....c_ o a) o -0 v 4- CO -o 0 -; °� �� _. 0) E E a) o __ r • ';:.; -. : ; O U - ., la) 1 ...._, 0 0) , w ,_ c -- 0 a) c _c L- al = u) a) w (1) -1-a 0 CI • . E2 < w co — ,._ (I) Cz C O C v -� > CO E•0 a) -c) 2 co C 4- O CD Cl) V) CO O El2 >, >' U D 0 ?_N o o 0_ > -0 D Elft01 0 Cad :5 N a.' C.) C\I 0 il ■I ai ft.1 pi 6 C.; t 194 0 • r %.1"t40 .I g Cd r s r a To . tt ti iel .F.. t t _ ' 317 1 " '' 1{ V `O ..- I ; + ri r 4 ;d e 4 S Pi _' S� 0 i 0 v. CD. x 1 4 s li pf it ; 1 p , g= mE COF $8$ i 1 _ 1,1 `.7 6iy jigy i}14 is C3 V e t • • .- I NUM i# t� 9 7 71 GI 6. a i —0 . — 1101; IE PM — — mo I ill!! lr, i @z i$; of r I (ICS #,' Pli r • • J - lid Am Iii hi - — i # f 691E Ii; 1 ! i��i YOWAtik71SY3' ! I L; i! Tel II 1. = !! s! !1 `.,i Eitt,----1 R z z'a 42.elipoi) c.-s' i o 4 •• pi■d'e ail*_j pisio,-,..-j- csit; i b . ,,, J1 1' � 1 _ .∎ ∎.' k .e Q) - =•=-�_- g =? -•-- a$ a. n, a Q Irin >1 W L — _ a a 11 cn o -�' L CO d) 0 E 2 u.) I Q) - CD o . a) ca a) (..)c eL ._ — (f) o . . O) — >a) CZ p co o cill1 11 s_ — o c Q ca) co a) c — c ,_ a) a) o (0-1 R ,z a) co U or) ,,: ..,!: 0 u 0 ,c4 c a..) 0‘,..„.01, _,.,,,_ , „i4 cl_ • A, 1:14 41*-1 c,,,) • • 0 , .. •41,-;,',:,',:;;:'Ll...:„.-•' . . . . . ''' -7—'n -7' '''"4..;4;. .'3'.,;,'•' . . . . . :,,,, ,•',A., it,re:. :, . .,,,,,..,..,,..„v1;4,$,,,,N,,.;. . . . . =.1:;,:'., ,,,•`.i",.'!f:.''... q.'1.14:,,''.,.:.,4=.4‘.: ' ,. ..L.,,„,.„.‘,.„ . .... ' • '1,',:i,i',1'11!;',:',')! ::P.:-..;.`'',, i-r.",=4";:'.;,•:,.;:,:... .: :..,, ' .,.a,...,.:•:,..,,, I 0 . '- - "' - • t* .".' . . • ;.-,,% • •..".'s,':::;:,4■ 47,',4';.': '. ,.',,iii,'4...', - ..• . . ,.., •... '. L',. f' .' .., . •. ..,.... • . ., . . ' . ,..,....., . . . ,....,.,.:. .,.:„„„..,... . .. , ?:...... ...... ,.. _ . .„,.. ..,...,.,:....,......,.,,.,„.., „ .....,, . . ....,......,... . .., , ........,..,, ..„„. ..:.,, ,. .,... .,. \ . , ). .,. . ... .. , , .. c,) C 1E4 • ■ 416 - - rf-.• (11) 111:41'3' • Ct3 --v ..., ._,..... . . . , ■C . - 2 ONNII :. ,..... \ tz,.. • . ........ ...- . .... -..., 1 1.... , -1 .. I , :01 ;.....,,. , .. • , , y A4 4 _....r ,, • B.4 ... ._ ' .... .. . .. •r '' ,.. vi -... . _,. Chum) ""i '7,"`.: -,...,;;;2'4",...-. ; .;i:.;' .■.:,•.,'",•.,. ,.,.:.,:o.t..r 0 ‘44,ifivE 0 ,,, ( krjr.11 Z ;a4 •- '*1 °1 f ply0.cd iiiiiilligil......■. L. -:-..'1;2=;.P4.C.,•„:", ..,.,';'.; . i . ..,..1,;"3 4.n- U4','''''' 1;::'' 4$ ' • ' :r.",,\,,,,,,..'2.-.', ..:•' ,'. ,', .1:,,, ,.1."('` ...:'... ' . . '. -. a 'L''''7,1:,,,, ,' ` C I ail) 47r (110) E •EMMEN '. ...".■ -. .-• ..... C Cl) Cl) Mk CK3 -1-0 _C a) La _ a 0_ E ,E -0 w w , _ - _ . 65 i _ ■_ l m NI m i 0 4 > L - Imil 4 L O }+ CO I, - - ry M or) L =� N Q. (n - - Q I i ;06 E ...... a) 0 n a. -o -+--+ 0) — a) c m >, co (NI L ._ co .N .1-1 -0 E u..) k I OD .■••1 0) ril 1 � 1 : 'I 11 1. ..1 CD CO a) •_ c r II ..T. 1 ,. u = p - w w . ,„. - .. . . _ __ . -LI co Co P I . .... = -C -Ce, Pi 1 E C o :_: Cf) [it CO U.) •■•••■• NO 4 _J - •• - N Q - CCU �___ CI p C L - - O O C i 4 0 ly I I 11 i Q L U m L - 046,74 • eals, - ..ERF - , cio) . , .,, ...„.„,,, - •-•-•?...•;-•; ..,'' 1.'` ' - . , ..;,t,z,,,, ., . ......, '''.. 1,.,.. • .... ' • ...e.t'4,,.' . ,.' , .'.:, ',1!1',,,•:"A.,- 44" . 4 ' ' ' .• P ......- . .. ,.... ..,,,,,,„.... 1 . .. ... , , • , . ,"•••,,,,;',.''V.'5',-' • , . -'•.•^F,. ... . ,. •., . .`,..;'. •-• i • . . .-.2 ..:0 ...,,,.. :.., -., .-. , 0) • -,. C , , . • . . UIII) 4 . .. ' ,t,J. •;,- '''''4'. _,c..... """•.: ;%,„,.., .--.s'''''''. ''' CO , • i ' ... 11 ,,:„,•-...• - • - , ' it• if: d!'.. ' ' . ' f .4 iWirio,e'4Q'' ' .,....,-,,,, ,, , -,-,, ta...f.,`: ",, , ' ' e•-,-•,.• . • ' ''' ,•`:.«: ,,,,, ,":,,,i;pt' ? _1% '40: ". ' . . , ... , . „.. ,, 7 .1.:,. . -" ' IC''''4, ,,,,;,:k.„,•,,, ...4 ,., ' •4'444e i ''' . f : .,".:44.......ra , '.. . •,. . .4, • - ! ' L,4. .' -:. 'fie ,0, .it'.'.': .,d..i.%.A. . . — _ : . e'''.••••• „ l • . ., . -, , , , ... ,, . ,,,',''' ''`'\ ‘,0:•;'„' ,","""'."''11.':,,i'',n, 4'..'' ... .1:.';',; S-1411_ 6 g ( ' ,„„,,,,, 1'4111,..."49Prie eA F i I c la) C E 0 0_ 0 . .. A—•(0 ED > p al) ■ C 0 6 , CD -0 g Eco c .0:1—• -0 E 0. c D O 0 U U _c 0 O ca o .a) o_ > a_ O 401...........i 0 - !&14.. r5 c 4,WP-441 • �2 Asof,_ ae,' i S' "4t . S". i. Iwlplwr.,'r '. •� y 1. 4, iti •, ' - _ O • • {��W L w !• j I I I t (1111) . - i'a t Its c is ae Cr ; , ,•,,, ,,, ill 1 1 tt ':' ... .. ..' u E4 C ! yF i,,r .'-;. A .., 51: 1;fin, I .. t. _ 1 fix'";. ,.J, ,a ... 1 lk Itii-----1 ° Cd :143 - 1 1,41,„„iut4..... % V�1� ,s, , 94 .9: ...tliiti..___1 P4 .. c.:-:, t SIGN-IN SHEET PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING August 22, 2012 NAME COMPANY ADDRESS