Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012/04/25 - Agenda Packet - PC THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA APRIL 25, 2012 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Chairman Munoz_ Vice Chairman Howdyshell Fletcher_ Wimberly_ Oaxaca • II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Regular Meeting Minutes of April 11, 2012 III. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. A. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2010-00868 - GONZALO MENDEZ - A request to convert an existing non-conforming residential site into an industrial use within the General Industrial (GI) District(Subarea 8) located at 13249 Arrow Route -APNs: 0229-171-15 & 0229-171-16. This project is categorically exempt from the requirement of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (n) (Class 1 Exemption - Existing Facilities) Conversion of a single-family residence to office use. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTAND DEVELOPMENTAND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2011-00641- HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC - Architecture and site plan review of a 94-unit, small lot multi-family • 1 of 4 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA APRIL 25, 2012 RANCHO CUCAMONGA residential subdivision on 11.7 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwellings per acre) located at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue - APN: 0207-201-01, 21 and 44. Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18817, Minor Development Review DRC2011- 00892 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2011-00891. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18817 - HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC - A request to create a 94-lot tentative tract map on 11.7 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwellings per acre) located at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue-APN: 0207-201-01, 21 and 44. Related files: Development Review DRC2011-00641, Pre-Application DRC2010-00530, Development Review DRC2004-00705 and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17013. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT - • DRC2011-00891 - HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC - A request to remove 11 trees related to Development Review DRC2011-00641, a 94- unit small lot multi-family residential subdivision on 11.7 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwellings per acre) located at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue-APN: 0207-201-01, 21 and 44. Related files: Development Review DRC2011-00641, Pre- application DRC2010-00530, Development Review DRC2004-00705 and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18817, Minor Development Review DRC2011- 00892. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. IV. NEW BUSINESS E. TRACT MAP SUBTT18782 AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2010-00361 - Lewis Apartment Communities -A request for on-street parking on Town Center Drive west of Spruce Avenue adjacent to the Santa Barbara Multi- family housing development consisting of 192 units - APN 1077-422-21, 22, and 25. • 2of4 1 - PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA APRIL 25, 2012 RANCHO CUCAMONGA V. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the commission. Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda. VI. COMMISSION BUSINESS/COMMENTS VII. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11-00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, • or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on April 19, 2012, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position,you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is • 3of4 ,J PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA APRIL 25, 2012 RANCHO CUCAMONGA important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The Planning Commission Secretary receives all such items. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. • APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,216 for maps and $2,328 for all other decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us • 4 of 4 Vicinity Map � Planning Commission Meeting April 25 , 2012 ----------------- E a o f c j I ! L= E d > Q y c � d 19th St c i B TT ase Line /Base .i A; Churchi 1 Church '• E oothilli , Foothill 7E c j Arrow E 1 Arrow I — " Jersey r 3 A 8th i_. — _ tY w i F1 > O U 8th m H c 6th w N L C d Y t > Q 2 4th .—. _.._._ — «._ _. _ .—._. '4th 2 rse- C, and D Meeting Location: City Hall 10500 Civic Center Drive • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting April 11, 2012 Chairman Munoz called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 7:16 p.m. The meeting was held in the Council Chambers at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Richard Fletcher, Frances Howdyshell, Lou Munoz, Ray Wimberly ABSENT: Francisco Oaxaca STAFF PRESENT: Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner; Jeffrey Bloom, Interim Planning Director; Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney; Donald Granger, Senior Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer; Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary • ANNOUNCEMENTS None APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion: Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Wimberly, carried 4-0-1 (Oaxaca absent),to approve the regular meeting minutes of March 28, 2012. Motion: Moved by Wimberly, seconded by Fletcher, carried 4-0-1 (Oaxaca absent),to approve the adjourned meeting minutes of March 28, 2012. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00044-HOME & LAND LLC - The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for 13 condominium units on 2.12 acres of land in the Medium Residential District(8-14 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of San Bernardino Road,west of Vineyard Avenue-APNs: 0207-091-56 and 57 and 0207-101-48. Related Files:Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16510, Minor Exception DRC2009-00913 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00914. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. • B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16510- HOME& • LAND LLC -A proposed subdivision of 13 units for residential condominium purposes on 2 12 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of San Bernardino Road,west of Vineyard Avenue-APNs: 0208-091-56 and 57 and 0207-101-48. Related Files: Development Review DRC2005-00044, Minor Exception DRC2009-00913 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00914. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Donald Granger, Senior Planner, presented the staff report and a PowerPoint presentation(copy on file). He noted that the remaining parcels open for development in the City are somewhat unusual and this no exception. Commissioner Fletcher asked for clarification regarding the slope and access to the trail. Mr. Granger said that to achieve access to the trail would require numerous switch backs because of the steep grade and they would also have to penetrate the perimeter wall of the development. Commissioner Fletcher asked if they could add steps and if they could add in a slope along the fence to achieve this. Vice Chairman Howdyshell said that would encroach on those who live in the development because trail users would want to park there and to access the trail there, thus reduce available parking for the residents. Chairman Munoz said it would probably look different after the grading of the property and may be too steep to accomplish this. • Mr. Granger said to do this would be problematic in that the developer would have to first penetrate the perimeter wall, which could create a maintenance issue as well as create a nuisance from the use of the gate by those who live there and those visiting the trail. He said in his experience, most HOA's would be reluctant to have that because they could not control who comes into the project. He said such a provision would also have to be ADA compliant which would be another challenge with the steep grades. Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, said there is a connection from the Cucamonga Channel trail. He said the City of Rancho Cucamonga left an opening in the Pacific Electric Trail fence next to the flood control property that allows people to walk to the market. He said it is possible for them to get from this path to the trail but it does not meet the ADA requirements. He said an alternate pedestrian route would be to go under the Pacific Electric Bridge, and around the other side and up to the Cucamonga Trail connection. He said that the alternate route would require approval from CVWD for any needed improvements. Commissioner Fletcher said he thought trail access might be a benefit for the future owners. Mr. Granger confirmed that the Pacific Trails condo development does have a direct connection. Chairman Munoz opened the public hearing. Charles Lui 2211 South Hacienda Boulevard, Hacienda Heights, gave a PowerPoint Presentation (copy on file). He summarized the improvements made to the project including: modified the design to increase parking; changed two buildings to single-story; reduced number of units; reduced square • footage, reduced number of bedrooms; provided a doubled ratio of parking. Planning Commission Minutes 2- April 11, 2011 • Hilda_Hordyk, 8870 San Bernardino Road, reported highly restricted parking on San Bernardino Road and in the immediate area. She said there is not enough guest parking, the apartment dwellers already have cars on the street and there are semi-trucks making deliveries to the Albertson's store. She asked if the owners will be required to park their cars in their garages. She said this project has no sidewalks and the route for kids to go to the trailhead is dangerous. She asked about the old bridge as it is currently left for the homeless to sleep in. She asked that this development be built at once and she did not want anyone to move in until all the units are sold. She said she wants the walls for the development built at once. Tim Morakami, 371 Van Ness Way, Torrance, said he is the attorney that is drafting the CC& Rs on behalf of the applicants. He said it is common to mandate the garages be used for parking and not storage He said they could also restrict the use of the guest parking and ensure no overnight parking for visitors or owners. He said this will be a single phase project for construction and sales. Mr. Lui said the bridge is not on their property and therefore not in their jurisdiction. He said they originally proposed a trail connection but it was rejected by the Engineering Department because the 1:1 slope precludes the construction of an ADA compliant access ramp. He said the perimeter walls for the development will be built at the same time. Chairman Munoz said this developer has no control over the parking for the apartments. Mr. Morakami said he could add into the CC&Rs that no future amendments could be made to the CC&Rs without the approval of the City. Chairman Munoz closed the public hearing. • Vice Chairman Howdyshell commented that this is an unusual, challenging parcel;the applicant did a great job; they were sensitive to the concerns of the neighbors and worked hard with staff. She said the design and architecture is sensitive to the adjacent single-story homes. She said single- story homes sell first and at a premium. She said she is in favor of the project. Commissioner Wimberly concurred and commended the applicant for working with staff and the DRC as they implemented changes as requested. He said it is an infill site and unusual. He said the applicant has worked with the neighbors and the project is sensitive to massing. He said overall the project will enhance the area and he is in favor of the project. Commissioner Fletcher said many neighbors came to the neighborhood meetings and this helped to make it a better project, benefiting the new and existing residents. He said it would have been nice to see trail access but could understand why it is problematic. He said the project transitions well from single-story buildings to the existing single-story homes. He said they cut the density, increased parking, and will have restrictions on their parking. He said the developer did well. Chairman Munoz concurred and said the applicant was sensitive to the neighbors' concerns and held 3 meetings to be sure they heard their concerns. He said the City also has to be sensitive to developers and give them the ability to use their properties to their benefit as well. He said this is well designed in the Craftsman style. He said he sees a number of concessions made for the neighbors. The applicant also agreed to ensure garage parking is used for the parking of vehicles. He invited the neighbors to contact the Commission if they still feel they are being impacted. Steven Flower,Assistant City Attorney summarized the proposed amended conditions of approval, • specifically that the garages must be for vehicle storage and no overnight parking in the guest Planning Commission Minutes -3- April 11, 2011 parking stalls. He said in order to restrict future amendments to the CC&R's without City approval, • Condition #13 found on page A-6148 would have to be changed. Mr. Henderson noted that visitor parking should be for visitors and not for residents and garage spaces must be used as garages and not for storage. Commissioner Fletcher pointed out that adding the condition regarding visitor parking makes it difficult for the City to enforce the CC&Rs. Mr. Flower noted that the residents will have their own interests to consider. Vice Chairman Howdyshell said the residents will have their board, and will somewhat regulate themselves and therefore suggested the City not get too involved. Mr. Flower asked if they concurred on not allowing the residents to park overnight in the visitor parking, that they need to park in the garage. Commissioner Fletcher said this condition could force them on the street. Commissioner Wimberly noted that there are basically 3 stalls per unit. Mr. Granger noted the restricted/minimal parking on the street. He said the applicant may have concerns about no overnight parking for their residents. Chairman Munoz said to impose the restricted overnight parking condition may force them off the property to park if they have more than two cars. He said he should allow them to manage that in • their community. He suggested they add the condition regarding the use of the garages for vehicles and not for storage and leave it at that. Vice Chairman Howdyshell noted that it will take the 13 residents to manage and control themselves. Commissioner Wimberly concurred. Commissioner Fletcher agreed. Motion: Moved by Wimberly seconded by Fletcher,to adopt the Resolutions of Approval with one amended condition for Development Review DRC2005-00044 and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16510 and to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, WIMBERLY NOES: NONE ABSENT: OAXACA - carried . . . . . C. AN UPDATE STATUS REPORT REGARDING MCALAN'S PUB 7 GRILL LOCATED AT 6321 HAVEN AVENUE -APN: 0201-272-06. Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, gave the staff report. is Planning Commission Minutes -4- April 11, 2011 • Vice Chairman Howdyshell said she heard an e-mail was still going around regarding the entertainment being offered at the business. Deputy Ron Wright stated the owner has media coverage such as Facebook and Myspace. He said some of the notifications are automatic, but no entertainment is occurring there and there have not been any further problems. He said the owner continues to work with us. Commissioner Fletcher commended staff and the Police Department for working with the business. Chairman Munoz agreed that good work is being done. The Commission took no further action on the item and the report was received and filed by the secretary. PUBLIC COMMENTS None COMMISSION BUSINESS AND COMMENTS Vice Chairman Howdyshell offered to bring her own report on Toby Keiths. • Chairman Munoz said he is looking forward to having them in town. Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner presented a copy of an invitation to a public meeting regarding the Development Code Update on April 19 at Central Park. She said this is an opportunity for the public to comment in an informal setting. She said it is being advertised and promoted in several different formats. Chairman Munoz asked if they are using Channel 3. Ms. Burnett said she would look into that and report back to the Commission. x x x x x ADJOURNMENT Motion: Moved by Howdyshell, seconded by Fletcher, carried 4-0-1 (Oaxaca absent), to adjourn. The Planning Commission adjourned at 8:30 p.m. Approved: • Planning Commission Minutes -5- April 11, 2011 t STAFF REPORT • PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: April 25, 2012 RANCHO TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CUCAMONGA FROM: Jeffrey A. Bloom, Interim Planning Director BY: Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2010-00868 - GONZALO MENDEZ - A request to convert an existing non-conforming residential site into an industrial use within the General Industrial (GI) District (Subarea 8) located at 13249 Arrow Route - APNs: 0229-171-15 & 0229-171-16. This project is categorically exempt from the requirement of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (n) (Class 1 Exemption — Existing Facilities) Conversion of single-family residence to office use. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Pipe storage yard — Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), Etiwanda South Overlay of the Etiwanda Specific Plan South - Storage Yard — General Industrial (Subarea 8) • East - Vacant parcel —General Industrial (Subarea 8) West - -Single-Family Residence - General Industrial (Subarea 8) B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - General Industrial Subarea 8 North - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) South - General Industrial (Subarea 8) East - General Industrial (Subarea 8) West - General Industrial (Subarea 8) C. Site Characteristics: The project is located on the south side of Arrow Route between Pecan Avenue and Hickory Avenue. The site is currently improved with a legal, non-conforming single-family residence. To the west, is a legal non-conforming single-family residential dwelling unit, to the south is an industrial storage yard, to the north across Arrow Route is a large pipe storage yard and to the east is a vacant parcel. D. Parking Calculations: A new paved parking area adjacent to the single story office will contain 6 parking stalls, which is a surplus of 2 parking stalls. Four stalls are required for the 924-square foot office use at a ratio of 1 parking space for every 250-square foot of office area. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is proposing to convert an existing non-conforming residential unit into a building contractor's office and yard use on a .7 acre parcel within the General Industrial • (GI) District (Subarea 8) at 13249 Arrow Route. The design of the exterior of the existing house will not change but the interior will be required to adhere to all building requirements for an office use. The house was originally approved ITEM A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2010-00868— GONZALO MENDEZ April 25, 2012 Page 2 • during the time that the site was under the jurisdiction of County of San Bernardino. The site will be reconfigured to add over 4,000 square feet of landscaping in the front setback and around the perimeter of the rear yard area to meet the 12 percent landscape requirement of the General Industrial Zoning District. The existing 529-square foot garage will be utilized as a storage area for tools and equipment for the construction business. An unpermitted garage to the south of the permitted garage will be demolished and an existing container will be relocated behind the remaining garage. The area behind the garage will remain unused. Trees will be planted along the perimeter of the rear lot and a new masonry wall will be constructed along the east, west and south property lines. A wrought iron fence is proposed to cross the width of the lot at approximately 47 feet from the new curb face to help screen the parking lot area and provide security for the site. B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Howdyshell, Wimberly, Granger) reviewed the project on March 6, 2012 and recommended approval to the Planning Commission. C. Technical Review and Grading Committees: The Technical Review and Grading Committees reviewed the project on March 6, 2012 and recommended approval. D. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act • (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under the Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (n) (Existing Facilities — Conversion of a single- family residence into an office) because the applicant is converting a single-family residence into an office use. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Design Review DRC2010-00868 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval and Standard Conditions. Respectfully submitted, Jeffrey A. Bloom Interim Planning Director JAM:SF/dl Attachments: Exhibit A - Site Utilization Map Exhibit B - Site Plan Exhibit C - Floor Plans • Exhibit D — Landscape Plan Draft Resolution of Approval for DRC2010-00868 A L VA3 ib 7 i �weawoosearoas nary ` I , � ii j2 slll� d:�Et,,�IE III, i �IIt �,;, i� �� ,F'• li...'II .,. IONIL al n'fil�Ir t Iff4"d�{i•11 IIUi,.: j.. _ G II I t p \ o Z LO 4r ,V 7 W f N A-3 EXHIBIT A [:]WEE dYNAIRIJIA ONb%3ONI'S31ON IHN3`J'NVd 3115 pl 'i ANVdV4005 3102if331BV0 A et t t e 9 C s€ xi R o � ? 9p�nn? 9F. z i ' 3f�o"• a d Y p s d 3 asee:�a `y ®i CZ v V) W H ^ k 'O rro, uiW [:[ 9344( [F •J�[ 5 ����p �' _ , F¢p p p g epPp� ��i° eeg§ $ . s '' ta 4e e ° r:' 3 ! €3 •�. Pa[ = 'Q § 1 YP P§ E 2 P• I; ` o tPIl P �.�3ef§=€ yyiFRR! F• SI� iP P 3 !e IQ � i5�a8pp 8 fi ppP € �§�E=5 a ¢¢° i SI Pa 1 4 1€� n4 � 1F % aF ° §F 4 a � � {OE€ Ip 1i � '1 t i4 ➢c€eiT3 9y� § •. V !°3PEP�23 64 @=i ➢ Eisas§II §1 IIF� d�Qy F ,�3@ e I el =ii � §� Teen i Ee 1p=a f d! i'Pi •P9•€ ii 1 j j !2S • 8 I 32E : -p iQi F § i':!{ F�9 1 te? 33 FF 9 Iii Pii § y t °s 3 e' 9 3 p a 3 t' R _.@. I s€ a 6 d pp €� p•?�4' €[[ @ �� 4 6�3 1 ;€. I�Pi l,8'§j Ei ii 3 F ' P 9 � - I4:� � _ "Pis? �_ § € p . SS. _ . Pa{ s'•BxI F€ Q�PV !P 3 s t p Iliy 9§P Ey .ppPF EP € �a r3 P� j� P � ai f' � p _ {4 58 tV§Pe€➢lE OF{'v° 9§� ;noP {9ell a�461p €21 3 iIti l ep4§E oP• € ° E '333�i� 4'O��P;I 33 q3 ➢p§ `ei lin{Itae'4i €1t�0 = fill, � lei �FjiiP€{P€pi ig =;l €1€4@3o�59;123g41 Pf64:1Ply .A.g2 Y R IT R ut41L lw11wJ*' q�rt,��. �� E 5310N OW NO1d tlOOl3 qG ] •n..»i:r mn: a.�.0 v�pe.a..sn j � VNA3 kd r I u++arvoostl31oae Jim • d e 0 • � r F 4 r q [ Y F r p e [ 9 99999' ��I e n e °vneoo �p jPI l4 �o a esY..YX 9( If9I en 6 'i i III I � "s' �9lFif'�11� i i �Il.lII?il e FI.99.;911 � SI "•�k WM =�eY`-�YF YQY XXY --i-�' - A-5 EXHIBIT C c a I I <et io e� 6 ♦• `} YO'tlONOWY000 OHONYtl NV-1d ONIlNTId aznoa:noeeYWE 12�;.�d."•.m4 r '00 sa3r Oo 9319Y ' - J d o u $ ❑. IIUp g IIL I e C a ® m • � 5 � � � # i � E a } 8 } d i % g p a d }0 i � fl ? H � 4 51 E F � 060 00 Ego E Pd 9t6 P c% �. L66 35 6 — d °Q .. $ %b $ %.•° E }aa ES-EFF = '% ya t% d :X i 1 � ? Y % }% ifi P E EF $ H •y• 3e E ON ra, �C•P $ E %°% .Y He �S i�Ei%�€ EC[ %42 °"' - _sa $•e `($" a %§ [-€ a $ i a: 4 E 0. 's,3. $s:a* a6 ii• is%°e :E c"sp *e' : •is � $�-. i _ ° H yeas. PI�,e �ai }ii :aE MW {P _ }: 4 s i } t $x4 4e - E° ri:ag `: px�i% dF %°$ r .. r :°j Ftg H°ae "sa:. }i;H?-F �{y Y ;$°•' ,°! {f•i H t,k,3P°i ��y X{ � sEy a 4 6 _g 8E4$.° ;:. %4 %aa yy {. a` • B§ `a26k' :il_ PE- 1f ab $Er • g%ps$%F e} 6 $ % s{,- ,E�_ iF, 5g }I.sE Hy.101(lt$: Sna i nE 6 . - •L tYis '. °4:Y9P5$ F:�E {f Fda%-{ ye�aesy ee? -is H y3ri$� - Ey}iF$ SH• f qF €#.r& E :rs r%;i ea s if M:— ji4 riY?6$6 s° 5He HY4E[ A EXHIBIT D a f`C g$ sc { .'•.` 4 vo voraovrvornouorVv Bi �e NVId NOUVE)N81 anotlmouNi'61 , L�LL aa���� gg p 1 ' op 5L3H10tl63tBtlD ,J a 0 )y 1 la� p p p pIII� pp pp x a •o F s?ea � 7s� �� ' - - sF } �, a F f����l a ,S➢ �ei 3Pip a at`E {� 65p yii az as Fi � Fa'F! �g� :� ! � �; S ���{ � �s R�S3ai �� •�,� . . ${ �, y 'a3 F Ex 75 E•a Si f E f g iP{` PF�? y+ ii9: if I! ;I ziFY e`;I r i Fi Y +#a y#1 is iR Y: � is y!F iS1 i s bF!{'{Se 'it IE I E 4p ii R{R_ a �-P R;� !+; Fj P �; y yRlY{{ !y f8 y `• W a s y ,y¢ 9 � '•ii` x {! . ° R.1 €!r a ��! � S ^ - $ d ��18€d S gai R° So¢lii di eq Fe F gR®6°in 1'� a E tee: f S Y ! d FEl IF y k P{ 1 Y ve RY ii` Ry y+ • R fr if•- {c 'S e zB s°% i(Q FY P 11a$ !df ,s 8s. e.I §$6 pp y 79 E fvR; % ae ae� ii fYi ys; S' FF 4pE I gl{'aii aii 6 F2 A i bpIfA Y ip �.`{ �j �i{ �Fd ;��p Fi • � ��sF s^ E r,-s _ ae•s• i•i D [� p - �f9_ REa a RS 2R° f P yF Pf ;6• � Y S F v a <yfs Ivssi x •i ).s p r i a x p °gy y5 I�i� R°di f` i p ��si7 e' a� ��7: �[c�Fd 'Fa �ai `1:; � A �"s9i° 5 �r t32'r 8a tt FC f+i -S' ii. 1 $•ayy5 + si ypf � -3 4 if ° p p{� &&s a g3y }s°'1ep �i ss .H ?F$a•` ? :, aaf: r!: [it fEi P; s`S Sep F. dti' k iea a e L{@@ppi }}�! �� sgpp RR 7Ex€ ; a'$ aiiEF VP E ¢ • !7s vvn'1 `r t °[��Edd _ •g•. ;a�5?z - a :,tdl COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2010-00868 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICANT: GONZALO MENDEZ LOCATION: 13249 ARROW ROUTE -APN: 0229-171-15 AND 0229-171-16 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements Completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval,or in the alternative,to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 12-18, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved In the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Notice of Exemption -$50 _X_ B. Time Limits 1. Development Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has • not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. A-8 1 Protect No.DRC2010-00868 Completion Date C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/ • site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program,and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations 2 Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations Incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.)or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code,all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building • permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. Trash receptacle(s)are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations,and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers. AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 10. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, / / Including proper illumination. --- D. Shopping Centers 1. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. / ! 2. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space abuts a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide. • A-9 2 Project No.DRC2D10-00868 Completion Date 2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall _!_! contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). — • 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, / and exits shall be striped per City standards. --- F. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, Including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior.to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking /—/ stalls. — — 3. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 4. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping as defined in Ordinance 823 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code G. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; • C. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams,water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number(i.e., SUBTT#, SUBTPM#, DRC#)clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and"wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers'Compensation coverage to / / the City prior to permit issuance. --- 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety Department. • A-10 3 Project No DRC2010-00868 Completion Date H. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be _/_/_• marked with the project file number(i.e., DRC2010-00868) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or major addition,the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permits issuance 3. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. --- 4. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public counter). ——— I. Existing Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC)for accessibility to public buildings —/—/- 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for California building efficient standards. --- 3. Provide draft stops in attic areas. 4. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A 5. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for the property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness of existing buildings. --- 6. Due to the scope of the project, an Occupancy Change review is required. Submit plans to the Building.and Safety Department to determine compliance for the proposed use 7. Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be required. / J. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code,City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial coriformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to ! / perform such work. --- 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the / time of application for grading plan check. --- 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. • A-11 4 Project No.DRC2010-00868 Completion Date 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of • combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT, (909)477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: K. Street Improvements 1 All public improvements(interior streets,drainage facilities,community trails,paseos,landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter,AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy,fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council,except:that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings,structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: • Curb& C. Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail Other Arrow Route X X X X (1) (3) 9500 15 lumen gallon 4. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees,street lights,and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements,prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. C. Pavement striping, marking,traffic signing,street name signing,traffic signal conduit,and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving,which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. e. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be • installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. -- A-12 5 Project No.DRC2010-00868 _ Completion Date 5. Street improvement plans per City Standards for all private streets shall be provided for review and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being performed on the private streets,fees shall be paid and construction permits shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. 6 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 7 Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typlcally sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation In those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The Engineering Services Department reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer. Min. Grow . Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Qty Arrow Route Gingko Biloba Fairmont" Maidenhar Tree 5-feet 25-feet 15-gallon 3 Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting,an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. • 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 8. All public improvements on the following streets shall_be operationally complete prior to the issuance of building permits: Arrow Route. L. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting I _ Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. M. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District(CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District,and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits,whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. • A-13 6 Protect No.DRC2010-00868 Completion Date N. General Requirements and Approvals • 1. Etiwanda/San Sevine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 2. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City,covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills,and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: O. Security Lighting 1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. 2. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. �. Security Fencing 1. All businesses or residential communities with security fencing and gates will provide the police with a keypad access and a unique code. The initial code is to be submitted to the Police Crime Prevention Unit along with plans. If this code is changed due to a change in personnel or for any other reason, the new code must be supplied to the Police via the 24-hour dispatch center at (909)941-1488 or by contacting the Crime Prevention Unit at(909)477-2800 extension 2474 or extension 2475. Q. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime visibility. ——— • A-14 7 RESOLUTION NO.12-18 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW DRC2010-00868, A REQUEST TO CONVERT AN EXISTING NOW CONFORMING RESIDENTIAL SITE INTO AN INDUSTRIAL USE ON .7 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED AT 13249 ARROW ROUTE IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 8); AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 0229-171-15 and 16. A. Recitals. 1. Gonzalo Mendez filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2010-00868, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 25th day of April 2012, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a public hearing on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: • 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on April 25, 2012, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located between Pecan Avenue and Hickory Avenue on the south side of Arrow Route with a street frontage of approximately 110 feet and a lot depth of approximately 300 feet, and is presently improved with a single-family residence and detached garage; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is undeveloped land used as a pipe storage yard and is zoned Low-Medium Residential; the property to the south is developed as a storage yard with no buildings and is zoned General Industrial (Subarea 8) and; the property to the east is vacant undeveloped land and is zoned General Industrial (Subarea 8); and the property to the west is developed with a legal non-conforming single-family residence and is zoned General Industrial (Subarea 8); and C. The project consists of the conversion of an existing legal non-conforming single- family residence into a an office and storage yard; and d. The project conforms to the basic Development Standards of the Development Code which requires screening for storage of work vehicles on site. • 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: A-15 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.12-18 DRC2010-00868 — GONZALO MENDEZ April 25, 2012 Page 2 a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan by • encouraging uses that are compatible with the surrounding uses and activities that do not have a negative impact on the surrounding area; and b The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located by providing a mix of landscape and screen walls to conceal outdoor operations and still adhering to setback and height regulations that govern the area where this business will be conducted, and C. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code in that the conversion of a single-family residence into an office use must be approved by a Development Review within the Industrial Zoned Districts; and d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity as masonry walls, landscaping and street improvements have been proposed to minimize any impacts on the surrounding area. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under the Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (n) (Existing Facilities — Conversion of a single-family residence into an office) because the applicant is converting a single-family residence into an office use. In addition,there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The • -Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the conversion of a single-family residence into an office use with the development of the yard into a parking lot for the storage of fleet vehicles. 2) Outdoor storage of items on the property was not reviewed. Any future outdoor storage other than vehicles parking in the parking lot is not allowed. 3) Storage of vehicles on-site shall be stored in the parking area behind the screening elements constructed for that purpose. 4) Free-standing light standards shall not exceed 25-feet or the height of the shortest on-site building. All lighting shall be shielded to confine the light spread to within the site's boundaries. Engineering Department • 1) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except A-16 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.12-18 DRC2010-00868 — GONZALO MENDEZ April 25, 2012 Page 3 • for the 66 kV electrical) on the opposite side of Arrow Route shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the project frontage on Arrow Route. 2) Arrow Route frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Major Arterial"standards as required and including 50ft from centerline to ROW and 36 feet from centerline to curb and gutter: a. Provide curb and gutter, sidewalk, drive approach as required. b. Proposed drive approach shall conform to City Standard Drawing No. 101, Type C. C. Provide (1) 9500 Lumen HPSV street light at Station 10+40. d. Provide traffic signing and striping, as required. e. Provide R26 signs, or replace as required. 3) Transitions to existing curb and gutter(pavement) east and west of the project boundary shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. • 4) Installing frontage improvements on Arrow Route will concentrate flows in the gutter that discharges to the property to the west. This will need to be mitigated on-site. Developer may stop the curb and gutter 10 feet from westerly property line to allow surface drain on-site. Alternatively, a curbside drain outlet modified with reverse flow may be installed to allow surface drain on-site. A drainage acceptance agreement shall be provided for acceptance of public water from the street prior to building permit issuance. 5) Fees due prior to building permit issuance Transportation fees: $5,138.20 Office/business park: $5,585 per square foot (FEES SUBJECT TO CHANGE) Building and Safety: Change of Occupancy Standard Conditions for Existing Structures NOTE: STRUCTURES THAT CHANGE OCCUPANCY MUST COMPLY WITH THE 2010 CBC CHAPTER 34 FOR A HIGHER OCCUPANCY CATEGORY,ADA&TITLE 24 ENERGY EFFICIENCY. FOR EXISTING BUILDINGS ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW (S) • 1) Due to the scope of the project, an Occupancy Change review is required. Upon approval of the Development Review, submit plans to the Building and Safety Division to determine compliance for the proposed use. A-17 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.12-18 DRC2010-00868 — GONZALO MENDEZ April 25, 2012 Page 4 • 2) B&S requires that change of occupancy plans from a "R"occupancyto a "B" occupancy be prepared by professional designer or architect or engineer. 3) Provide compliance with the 2010 California Building Code (CBC) for the property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistive rating of existing buildings. 4) Provide required restroom facilities per the CBC. 5) All exiting must comply with the requirements of CBC Chapter 10 (type of hardware, door swings, etc.). 6) Accessibility for the disabled must be provided at the site and within the building in accordance with the 2010 CA Building Code. 7) Due to the change in occupancy of the facility, the structure must be reanalyzed for the current wind, seismic and vertical loads. 8) The facility must meet the State of California Energy Conservation Standard regulations applicable to the new occupancy as presently required. 9) Upon tenant improvement and/or change of occupancy plans review, • additional analysis may be required. Fire Services: Change of Occupancy Fire Standard Conditions for a CUP Application 1) A change of occupancy plan is required to be submitted to Building & Safety for the evaluation of the proposed use in the existing commercial/industrial building. Some of the issues that must be addressed include (but are not limited to): accessibility to the buildings and facilities, floor loads, type of doors, swing of doors,seismic orwind analysis for the current adopted codes and exiting criteria. If you have any questions please contact Moises Eskenazi, Senior Fire Plans Examiner at (909) 477-2710 ext. 4209. Building and Safety (Grading): 1) Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2) A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the • State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at Grading and Drainage Plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. A-18 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO,12-18 DRC2010-00868— GONZALO MENDEZ April 25, 2012 Page 5 • 3) A Geologic Report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4) The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official priorto the issuance of building permits. 5) A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 6) The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 7) If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8) A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for • on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 9) It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off- site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 10) It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off- site drainage acceptance letter(s)from adjacent downstream property owner(s) or discharge flows in a natural condition (concentrated flows are not accepted) and shall provide the Building and Safety Official a drainage study showing the proposed flows do not exceed the existing flows prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 11) It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s)to construct a wall on the property line or provide detail(s) showing the perimeterwall(s)to be constructed offset from the property line. 12) The Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right-of-way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail • including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. A-19 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.12-18 DRC2010-00868 — GONZALO MENDEZ April 25, 2012 Page 6 13) The Grading and Drainage Plan shall Implement City Standards for • on-site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 14) All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right-of-way or adjacent private property. 15) Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed -per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 16) The maximum parking stall gradient is 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 17) Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 18) The final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show existing topography with a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 19) The applicant shall provide a Grading Agreement and Grading Bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The Grading Agreement and Bond shall • be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 20) Provide documentation for C.V.W.D sewer offset program to the Building and Safety Official for review prior to issuance of a grading permit. 21) This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 22). The Precise Grading and Drainage Plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 23) Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the Grading Contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre- grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The Grading Contractor shall call into the City of Rancho • Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: A-20 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.12-18 DRC2010-00868 — GONZALO MENDEZ April 25, 2012 Page 7 • (i) The bottom of the over-excavation; (ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; (iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the Grading Contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter)an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record, (iv) The Rough Grading Certificates and the Compaction Reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 24) Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the Engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) Best Management Practices (BMP) devices. 25) It is the responsibility of the applicant to meet all accessibility requirements. • 26) Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit a Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 27) Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a drainage easement or letter from the adjacent and/or downstream property owners accepting concentrated drainage flows. This condition also includes concentrated flows from the sump area created on Arrow Route. 28) Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit, the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 29) For all storm water seepage pits and other storm water injection wells over 10-feet deep, the applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Official prior to issuance of the grading permit. 30) If the depths of the seepage pits/infiltration wells is 10-feet or greater below grade, the land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the underground • infiltration pits to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMPs) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All A-21 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.12-18 DRC2010-00868 — GONZALO MENDEZ April 25, 2012 Page 8 costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the • responsibility of the land owner. 31) Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit, the Grading and Drainage Plan shall show existing topography and planimetric features 100-feet south of the property line/project boundary. This is to determine the flow path of the storm water flows and their effect on the adjacent downstream properties. 32) Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit, all developed storm water flows shall be mitigated to the pre-developed storm water flow conditions. 33) Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit, the permitted Grading and Drainage Plan set shall include a demolition plan of the existing site features to be removed. 34) Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit, the applicant shall record easements for all work on adjacent private property(s). 35) Priorto issuance of a Grading Permit,the Grading and Drainage Plans shall show the location of the existing sewer lateral from the existing building discharging to either a public sewer or a private sewage disposal system. If necessary the existing sewage disposal system shall be reconstructed to current adopted Plumbing Code requirements • at the direction of the Building and Safety Services Director, 36) Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit, the applicant shall submit to the Building and Safety Services Director, or his designee, a Soils Infiltration/Percolation Report with recommendations for the engineering of the proposed storm water seepage pit(s)/injection well(s). 37) A Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF APRIL, 2012. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • A-22 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.12-18 DRC2010-00868 — GONZALO MENDEZ April 25, 2012 Page 9 • BY: Luis Munoz Jr., Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner I, Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of April 2012, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • • A-23 STAFF REPORT • PLANNING DEP.ARTNIENT RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: April 25, 2012 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jeffrey A. Bloom, Interim Planning Director BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW - DRC2011-00641- HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC - Architecture and site plan review of a 94-unit, small lot multi-family residential subdivision on 11.7 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwellings per acre), located at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue - APN: 0207-201-01, 21 and 44. Related file: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18817, Minor Development Review DRC2011-00892 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2011-00891. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP - SUBTT18817 - HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC - A request to create a 94 lot Vesting Tentative Tract Map on 11.7 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwellings per acre), located at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue -APN: 0207-201-01, 21 and 44. • ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT - DRC2011-00891 HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC - A request to remove 11 trees related to Development Review DRC2011-00641, a 94-unit, small lot multi-family residential subdivision on 11.7 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwellings per acre), located at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue - APN: 0207-201-01, 21 and 44. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Project Density: 8.03 dwelling units per acre. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Two Mobile Home Parks; Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) South - Attached and Detached Residences; Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) East - Attached and Detached Residences; Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) West - Attached and Detached Residences; Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) North - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) South - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) • East - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) West - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) ITEMS B,C, & D PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2011-00641, SUBTT18817. TRPDRC2011-00891 - HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC April 25, 2012 Page 2 • D. Site Characteristics: The 11.7 acre vacant project site is located at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue and was previously approved for a 105-unit attached and detached residential development (DRC2004-00705). The site has regularly been cleared of vegetation and generally drains from north to south. There is an existing drainage facility on two separate properties to the east that facilitates surface flows from the mobile home park to the north and will be removed with the proposed development. One of the mobile home parks to the north has an access easement across the project site to provide vehicular access to Baker Avenue. This easement will be preserved with an automatic gate between the two developments. There are 11 trees on the site that conflict with the proposed development and will need to be removed (Tree Removal Permit DRC2011-00891). ANALYSIS: A. Proiect Proposal: The applicant proposes constructing 94 detached, two-story residences that will consist of two housing types and four architectural styles (Spanish, Cottage, Craftsman and Tuscan). There will be 86 zero lot line homes that will face landscaped paseos (units at the entrance of each paseo will face the street), with the garages accessed by a drive aisle at the rear of the units. The remaining units will consist of 8 center plot homes with the garages and the front entrances facing the drive aisle. The homes will range in size from 1,663 to 2,000 square feet. The Development Code requires that the Optional Development Standards be used when detached residences are developed within the Medium Development District. The Optional • Development Standards require a minimum 30-foot front-to-front separation and a 15-foot side- to-side separation between dwelling units. The project density will be 8.03 units per acre, which is within the 8 to 14 dwelling units per acre permitted by the General Plan. The project would not be able to meet the minimum density requirement with the inclusion of single-story homes. Two plans, however, will include a bedroom on the ground level. The recreational amenities will include two swimming pools (adult and children's), a spa, a bathroom facility and BBQ area with tables. There will also be a separate tot lot located within a large open grass area. A common seating area will be provided at the end of each paseo. All of the streets and sidewalks within the project will be privately maintained by a Home Owners Association and will include on-street parking. The project will have 77 guest parking spaces, which far exceeds the minimum 24 parking spaces required by the Development Code. The main vehicle access will be on Baker Avenue, with a secondary access on Arrow Route. The mobile home park to the north currently drains across the site to a drainage facility located on the project to the east. This facility will no longer be necessary as the flows will be accommodated by the project's drainage facility. The applicant will be required to remove the existing drainage facility and walls, which will increase the private yard areas on the neighboring lots. B. Vesting Tentative Tract Map: The applicant is requesting the approval of a Vesting Tentative Tract Map, which locks in all development standards for the two-year life of the Vesting Tentative Tract Map. The vesting map is eligible for three, 1-year extensions when approved by • the Planning Commission. A traditional Tentative Tract Map is valid for 3 years and is eligible for two 1-year extensions. The main difference is that if development standards change after the approval of the Tentative Tract Map (and before the final map is approved) the holder of the B, C, & D - 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2011-00641, SUBTT18817, TRPDRC2011-00891 - HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC April 25, 2012 • Page 3 traditional Tentative Tract Map may be required to make changes to the approved tentative map to meet the new development standards. C. Minor Exception: There is a grade difference between the project site and the existing developments to the north and west which requires the construction of property line walls over the maximum 6-foot high permitted within the development district. A Minor Exception permits walls over 6 feet but not greater than 8 feet. The Staff will approve the Minor Exception separately. D. Tree Removal Permit: There are approximately 11 trees on the site. The applicant has submitted an Arborist Report (Professional Design Associates —April 22, 2011) which concludes that the trees will be in conflict with the proposed development and will need to be removed. The project will be required to comply with the Development Code's tree planting requirement and plant at least 149 trees on site. E. Neighborhood Meeting: The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on February 7, 2012 which was attended by approximately 30 community members. The major issues raised were parking and access by the mobile home park to the north through the development. The applicant stated that the project provides on-site parking in excess of the minimum requirement and that there will be automatic gates to provide the residents of the mobile home park access through the project. F. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee on • February 14, 2012. The project was approved as presented with the condition to add a second story pop-out on the right elevation of Plan 4 and to redesign the seating areas at the end of the paseos. G. Grading Committee and Technical Review Committee: The project was reviewed by each Committee on March 6, 2012 and was approved as presented. H. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, hydrology and water quality, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and noise, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. A letter was received from a resident of the Casa Volante mobile home park outlining two issues they • wished to have addressed by the Planning Commission. Casa Volante has an access easement across the project site which will be maintained with right of entry controlled by electric access gates B, C, & D - 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2011-00641, SUBTT18817, TRPDRC2011-00891 - HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC April 25, 2012 Page 4 • The correspondent feels that a key pad entry is inadequate and would like for each resident to be provided with a remote control to operate the access gates. Because the access easement is between the two property owners, staff has asked the applicant to work out a mutual agreement with the owner of Casa Volante prior to the Planning Commission meeting. Staff believes that providing a remote control to each resident of Casa Volante (even at a fee) will over time become difficult to manage. It should be noted that that the residents of Casa Volante have stated that they do not want the future residents of the project site to have access to the mobile home park. The second issue raised is how the drainage from Casa Volante will be accommodated by the drainage facility on the project site. They are concerned that the drainage is currently conveyed to a drainage facility along the east property line. Staff contacted the resident and informed them that the project design includes an underground drainage facility that will convey runoff from Casa Volante to the public storm drain system. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Development Review DRC2011-00641, Vesting Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18817 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2011-00891 through adoption of the attached Resolutions with conditions. Respectfully submitted, Jeff ey A. om Interim Planning Director JAB:TV/dl Attachments: Exhibit A - Reduced Set of Plans Exhibit B - Design Review Action Agenda dated February14, 2012 Exhibit C - Letter received from Casa Volante resident dated April 5, 2012 Exhibit D - Initial Study Parts I, II, and III Resolution of Approval for Development and Design Review DRC2011-00641 Resolution of Approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map SUBTT1817 Resolution of Approval for Tree Removal Permit DRC2011-00891 • B, C, & D -4 PN gp U =I 2u Hm leEs (D Q) u) 6 a) LO c 0 m OM O . . . . SS m r 29 1 9 . I . 0 MZ 2 u . . . . . . . . M C2 & & CT 31 EXHIBIT A - -- -- -- ---2m B, C, D — 5 ut ;`i g 4�1�1�tn+ }yi�f• wl'.��� vq���y_.f� -.:. e^ �A 4i t��f s �C��' �ru [�y' ; v ■fsPif -01 tat Mm Ivl. � �fl r � �1 atlt ��ai � ip• 4r� ��1�, rrR�r� � s .mss • II }� M Y �" .SxM ileAe1 pt��.J �, - f41 �I Fy 'Fr 'sr p @r- ek ��4� y� � t •. yy°� � ��.^pt � �m '*t V � lrf +��� �t0 ����6�iAI �� ` I� I��albsa��r r [ rn 0 D �2 k a_ 0- 2! I c R p • jfiflliFltlEllFil ;: ! - j:.�:-�,:.— % 2 _� �E€ — 3 I-IR C) c co 75 :5 E a) D Z I. 1 R -0 a) all > '(D AISO 8189 24 - e LD 7 D < EE 0 u U a 0 < 9 i� 0: d_k I J I yHrah an a) a) C3) 0 In B, C, & D 95. gin= if LI 49 Ri elp .7 T 0 6— 77 io 10 0)r N I NU Z Too vo 1p s2 1a) I c LLI E; ai IC) a) CT C) < 0 a) B, C, & D C? 'uU Din E < E 0 tO L L 12 10 t ra i C: c 0 o A Ell 0 E L 0 MZ E' E it 4H B, C, & D 9 ............ MAW. "Uff CC .. . . .. ....... ........... WHIMS" I M 33 1- rim-�� also IIME WJ Al MIMS-, HIM 0 ----------------- --- --------- •x • --—--- - - ---- ------- --- LU ------- -- ---- - -- L CO -------- ------- C) ----- ------- LL c 0 Cc 0 M E m 17 --- ------- --- a) OZ co 0 — ------ ... k-4 ---Fr - - —------- ---- ED LLJ LU R. z Lu LL 1 t ------- - ------------------------------ 0 MI 6u mo _fix Or bQ LL B, C, & D sg Al �mt O "t J e w a .I m y / LL1 °a, Y + 3- - Z _ ° ° a� <} b Wes" J ❑ S G ,Iqt _—__ LLTt- U o r ;! DL,..1 1 _! v Qf III] - m LU \\ t y U ,ga l311 E C � o • ; 115 g Rc'.a E y a) UZ cu L C� � /N AI�I I� L \j Z w LD W v� U t O 1 00 1111"J CL } F gggg m r w�• h.,��i�r. (6 a gl ,� � $i16 V_ t '• � , W IL w� fE Z Ot91 3.�k}.Q� zi - ~ �ktFtL^flE:ttttF_•tt _ U e U },\.' 6 �1 "I B, C, & D - 12 sa • t&%7, 1 41 - 14, B, C, D - 13 0 62 a-M vim <Al 2 cb E z 0 • 0 o E LO) TrA EL 0 44' 0 0 05 B, C, & D 14 r-- �g N V =k • .U.vt: i s- Q CZ - -*— i iu E rr RE IF;m I YV7: O pi E d3 o pp W OO> O ) N l a 0 oa -p CS t E. 0 usmE w"0 B, C, & D - 15 till Ywi w it Z Ll k6� .0 qz- < G. z i ul i: lg=2 06 Q a> -EA o 00 z 0=z>u U3:v8 8 -o 0 sdo B, C, & D — 17 C-� t. EY < x" �—41461 Lo 0 (Di s En- 5 E Z: 0 c 0 0 ca a)U z 0 o gp 0 -C FT T my 0 11 i IT B, C, & D — 18 • T�quo 7�F - k �k' v�l;r ' s Q s 5 SHIM-- !u$& %+ z = A th'' tt f +: y GfC.-•''::5;_.vy� '-x1:'e T,t�' �-.?� 7" 0 • } ' C O O LLO ( O N e*� � L U Ull K Y B, C, 8 D - 19 ror n= N �h . v-�d ��i - f I 5• ..r.',._, Avon.. C i �U Una0) Cs ��_ � boo • I = � �Uz o n W U U z I s" I �,L M1LL I LT; L pG. m ooro9o� goabw • JU B, C, & D — 20 <- NMI MEN AMr 1W. HOW,II XWE 1 US 0 co Q) E LU C) 0 C) D CJ T-] Z uo < f LU z TV, 6 4. k9 U3: nub S - jglz 29 9i 2 < 4R B, C, & D 21 O cz o 0 (D o G is QC=HE P! -S 32 B, C, & D - 22 LILL- low No it, 7� LIT 0 .L 06 I aff LUT LS fir— c i fox (1) a Z 0 Poll CN ts m <0 C) CD cn < iEt B, C, & D — 23 7[1 -1F 717 r mo Tx, c = p < < E 4I �, � I .I l �; 'I i w e IFU-� C5 2 0)E �5 � 0 0 = 1 (D I E �Q Ou 0 a) z u:3 Z Ev 7i -4— re B, C, & D 24 — __ -«� � \\ 7r \ \ C o E i L) (D =' -z 5 2 u T 5 1 \ I awl � } B, C, 5 Q le is • 6 EMS tvjA UD 'eF Mom— I c 0 C) 0 o E 0 -5 U a) = z u ML)ffi'i 36 I hT F5 F, B, C, & D — 26 C9ZT Pb C� 5 jig um, ' U L I ' -III �� �r�l R<✓ � I O O C O 0 N � �Uy o boa) mE Coo • - � Ey r.& . : O N D Z .. �Ii:_ o ME, x c c Q C d RiC3�r� Ln ICI � � I I i f � g 2 9 z.� t�i�� 3 ou '6 0=�UUa UUC ¢ z Imo__ I t,_.. `)L'Iiow ox�g=0$✓,308�=� a 3 W w� -c & ¢ B, C, & D - 27 Cl) < iig� gF m6m WE o 0 o 'E 6 CZ u 0 c 0 > 0 = E , • 0 -5 Q) DZ LU c t CL l WMN ar EWM'- il 2 2 2 -6 0 2 B, C, & D -28 E • j ,Ell VL -j n°EE -10 505ff cZ5 0 C/) (D 0 > 0 a) E Ej- C) Q) DZ I On" F) 0, 0 z 6 � 00E 00 � t� B, C, & D — 29 y M LEA < iV3 Lrrrrr 0 M =01 ELI 2 L) .0 cnom E o 0 • > (D E LD psm Q) Mz E-2 2 miff 0 .rr . Z < Ll u z < 2 B, C, & D 30 < sy A i • z o Al Tl- !"7E 17, .1tr co a (D E A 20 B, C, & D - 31 fh c I Q £ S£ Q U _ S UZI! .�� pW z nyyy� � Q•?'S.pp� y oysQ� og� S2 I 0 o Ada") 'o of Coo • U U O O H e = > a) = Z �_ �a•• _ ;t„ _ Q O o� 4 A • h B, C, BD - 32 1 g N § xYkY.- I L a Q y • °,jam'' �—;_ F- Emil < Fa <0 Fiv- CL 0:f Cl) m E 0 = LU 0 -5 U CD 0 Z: OPHO I 0 all < u 2 0� B, C, & D 34 o =R LO Ll0 C) UNI 3<H F,7 E� I J I ca p 0 CD Z ID OE < ZR2S c C) 1 0 = t -5E ..� co I D D B, C, & D — 35 lfJ SL I Q � • W LL ii o< k dv � G € �de,OiESdV¢�V a ��u 3_���iu i i ,�=:.. .'..�Y ��'' a ,•�.� �yfa�'FP`�'�j�',�.,, � _ �� � I U i �I i • cm CD tt i B, C, & D - 36 xyr]- .9 y 6m A Fit t;r -USE 3:< CZ5 Cl) a) E 0 :5 ;:m mo 0 02- —EU u H0 2 B, C, & D - 37 ------ C-1 IX, Al, eN. lim mm_ TFA 71f RM s;g, WA 0 0 Lo C Itl Ll Mai Fl HR > 0 Fj-- A,3SE CC P.00 ull 6 L ow I B, C, & - 38 _ .71_ t�::':A- '�Cwt•,-.:. rye'. i:Y,.+yve�{''� rY%T.• L N d CL 4 O c 0 0 O �U w � • �a Z s o _O I coo • f ,.y.�;� � f N 6 S 4. v I U pY 4 Q w L.L ` V I -{-}- l rsu,/ I � i Ili aq � „I L7�, I I B, C, BD - 39 b � 5� gg3 -3 ° 9Q 8g4°aPiEg • • ApQ r •,8Q@ � gLQaQ'E1 55 Q @Qp PY e2Qeg9QYf P6P3��i QQ ��, ;°311 �^ hygghygPj 3�- QIpAI�A ! P 2�3 9`E 19 Q�0$F 81Q g i 91 .g�.SZaPe •llee.. S .. y x - 8�~� W 9YS 7 Q ���I �S ls�9�ai€aE� i9g��e�fi OE� g psi s < z sae; <�i o � QQI�S a� `J IIII IS.4:Ipl l� l�l�l� ©9S �.e.= x a...°.. . .. 'S�' :)eaca u QW- n I n r 1 a 1 a r 3 6 g� , Q—OQ $ � I r tvu A➢'1rlAlywS.muxuo� I � � j � -ti I 1 lil 8 P9 F- I I I Imo- I :^i,. li „o.l. ^:I I S I I � I ., I III 111 vi 3�iE •L Z W _ __ _ 53e ? 9� L O 6' yA m a —„71 y___ III •'3 s1 yg ��4Q Z I pp99906 zwrore"`. III Avuwmsln { I @5 A1lr>narna Yp�� <x°a. wr on PI IiL_��am_w AmvHYJgp • - _ I. _ aaoe tow r I0 III OWSW3 ---- II III a¢rzAY 99 arorn -T� IIr-------1 2 • 98 :.- ._\ 'rs<ox-eow I I 111 IRil F•...�;.x @ mm-'om « „ j - - « „ li -- •` ^3 o Ioz I � I� . w " rYi ` •- __lYlY6CQb AMv#I1M9M101 —� 1 ---_--1 •�r v. � - I �. _—_ NdY IWAV -�t:'—Y' -- - .MIIIXRfl Al1VfMw[wlw9IXl — fl =6=y' f I eQ= ,p - 6F• � aoiu�ow I 9'3F Y 1`Nr301Ci0 ADlrH19M r @ E , �• i'If��l��Y 'r a�� L x>♦oaam I 11 IYF ..-_..... ..R. -------_ Y7Q gi 'p' 3 g' 3.3c xry I I la g�g Y Q "......,i -v--- ru oiaio ---'yll i -=--1-0 r §€9i:z•e 5 tl q g @ IY%;9 Q xry I I ti-R JI p e.°3Q9 t @e! @ Y_5 - Pit,[ _ ____________ ' - trureana A>alrsnetes -11 I L @ 61p@ .,„ e - u wx ..,....�.. � 1��, P aAOe.zo%o I.._. lrulaUWtl AIWV>naza9 I g muuxa oe d I J1 I- i• ioa ♦ozo -n II •, _ ��< .. ------"-`. al 110 G_^ yl IL g z zi�• C° = sAV,-Y p-�9•q�''p§!tl z• unw uo» ;e��i\ S' = « :I „ „ , xn. - .: II. I Iz o JI 11- i@ •pglQ� iIi @@ Q "p9° =e 0!g.@ iisQ°9 '- mNk gt �YQ F.Cii 83.�`° 111.6g o f I•"a- �4 a cg I oA� ; I I o g 9 @z gQ,Y.do6•�p'Q` Egtl� 9!a�. ou5 sM� pl sk�.Y�lllAS:�i€Y![Ytl @lxY3��Y @ @S @QY � 1 R �Qrp _.._ <o :l�ob� - .� ml %}. I•g 1 .� I <o We P z Q 9 19 g it E z z I I I ------�—_�------ I 3rlPanr mwve Q�F Qgf� e1 �•d C/I P�<2 I I I.,j a I „�� �< I I o€<I h.n. 1 Y Q pQ•�� 8� p o u V,°r sce"'T_oog�•< 1 I I (JO- uW „ � i tl QY p�'a•z = @ z .g e!, e. !.5.^3 fill ilYFQs4 �IIm 9 g 6 �ppppg§§pQp lIQ P5 Yg8963• FF$��@y5 z ! __ sl a muaacu awAaxa I I - j.�88�`Yg�l�4 �vGtPeB�Fa n8 ¢ygF � 84 r-'- I I`I rc Avwrwvw I ocmv-tow I I I l i I I I I mama I xrr I I o Q. - - - - . _ B, C, & D - 40 y p€p 1l, �yySei y$€ p°p ; 9'9 s5 a �3� S i` s P i �rpa !? = `� f�—� � 4c`iW F �gypp{ SIGIe13�S€€€E3€Es92�3 11 1 iSf S P 9 A r6• v: 6 0 a B z Q '" W Sp8ga g ¢ a g CL 9 gp p a 11g 99¢ ss9 �5 tt i'E€a9 g$e5i 9 �h� m - 12-1 taa�rn SAS?1PEF!EE� 9Ea€ €_€5iESP9F {��F s 't2�Biaa�Fee`Fc6Ce�f!®24a�Ses���a�F S�3§6i 3 111111iddbVI II w i� G U ��e— @ U Jy1 'I 377 ,III(I j 3p Sp I�IryJ1'ryy� �I If ll � `:.I�:� Ill 11 f.��; �• p 9[Eaii ¢d S :J te."e<i� d 2 aZ Z_ P-Q0 _ CO .`�LYa e' ITM[n,iE ON 733H6 33E I &Y W W LLo _, G H ni!� �-..r,]7nF z«_l'7-iu'v.j 7.^�"•`.4i+ W.". Yob« Y'_—"•-__ � '1� �'ti .�1JiA.:`�,'i'ima @9 SfYIYL ric -[ozo x✓v= CO CL Y rt r, .a %RFii > 1 1 9 OVA �0 --__ i II HI- II tip\ a^• ra ,;, : .'r' ^^�,�j�' �kfS•:di � "d =-se — —'----ILI', I ¢5 II • °B° �^ 3 ^" e � III a¢ II Ico t a A a S!�3 o mb B6 rlil�il 9 II I • IK to"�.. \� �, ,9E! E9I�• "i€ _I_ . y a�bs �I� r� .:^°'.I l:Z�9i a�aa4e II '�I-�'��II I _pp Q z +aP lM"^a! '- =^Ft�•i•.q ;C,3� ILf a _- .." q : •�aFl.r.2 z. P p . III 1 y7 I' dl I C .".. 9i !• fijii� �• . 9r " P Iii $' ��.. :Ff it I .,tl. All l l h g II �� w . .gaa�n' : •is�! "�P•� �� �Cui': II I II�l 97 gg � p •�" 9 fl i•. I ,<�..:.aIQ�7�.•.'.,.� ''i �___ - ! ._ Yd •\�+"y �_�i�i�'� f.�{:`ssi I($.�I �e II I�� :1 •.:,, h ,. o�u31°: � _ _ - u _ III{`: IN II I<o __ _______________ ------ -' --- - Id 9 —g--—Ig— .—e n IIIif I I I I I g�z S g> 1 e� 1a 1VN3 1VIW "PN Ii16 a-iwimo t_ 0 ° x y rv_J o 111 It it i _-- I I I I zo.r_e Xgs<c� 111 I8 II I I I I e `DC'° 1;1 o B, C, & D -41 e , ° 1 ? �� avaffi O xa g5r < isiNg' t? 0pCL Zeg ° „ i��39uatm- �pq III li I I e oll h II e' Pp�ppS°piii a U =� g • QZUH�oa 7 1 }} rq{ ^®.a m ±.fIXCr..ve.a:...®e•S S.aYy Pe•.. GIE33e -'� f Z lul�r 1 t2¢_ P-� � o - o i111 g e a Q `u •1••J 1 I---- E• W i, yy 1 � � i � srlaetvmsaabAmvyd-ssowrs ano>slxa j I•• t s�re 33 a e ' _ �T�OR991\ � I e ��- \C. � 9�W � I • ��—�S Z y 11 'ON:m a <� bet €�y OYS91 'OPd tl! F— / co ;I 0 p 011 -- I > ` d p I tl ------� � �+ o I w�,wl' .• 3Sr tie. _ _ a ' �• G gm .o eL5 g III 113� 'il —pw�-- �'I Sg�Se ' g���� •y � �� g�@�B�P'u,;l I I�• Ilsl ' •� - ���.� Y"''<�e d III €�.- -- �`�� r. - �' .a. ':° •���@j�2�yj���t��.��<<,���= �=`EI!q� `III'I�I Iti $u 1�= ~ v g ' .T: __ �.I :-3-..`°.. ..13c=- ` • 111�Itt,}L ! ��11�I�e Jill .:i••rfi 11 T it ��- �. • a iw .� III o I, i"v' „ F• y, ..kte _F iept 3_Bi;. V�-R'�<lm. �ei3. ,a�}y jlry � II I �� `� II II y¢...' -- _ s ® I— —'•�1mll .@ g r r °�II wly :; o + •.:.' aF :F - '�Fi•; -_ .¢C � :,.,o>. $°€ � ¢ 6 IIIj�4e II lend . . .. ... ., _i •ice. - n< - €__----TI ig m II L� _ E6 e � .� . � Ic; . - � � r• S � _________-� I VIII I ¢ II I u �a�n .___.., •M1 p•° ��» N..e f Yo ����� ...f ! : : I ' � _ 'x,•u � Y ry_ ��g __ _- I lV ill j II i<o 1 [f 21 V -- ... ST�I11 ❑I -- B, C, BD - 42 i J !PTv � rr RRRR m e l �'. w ii,j ��O)V Jaa 'vp d Cl1w � � � =��e � • OF cr lZLL� �LUZ [� tF F e 3{ O $ p°esgE � i8g3_eaep,e a9a�p9gie� 3i@ F- s i o tit- IlP€PaifSPaae� spit Z 4 w w I ; o e : m •eaayv.✓tv..a...C_Y.55an.i]Fe.. a��pF��a 1a Z CO LLJ r z� � S E .c U � e �—�— aNi'I 5 ml s — • � F Ee e E • i �A P� iW e a�ky: r a a Ee4 all TT IViagpao:.ea. �li �: e5 rl N :GiifiGiiiiiff Zm P�. r, E A - °' pppp 'eaaaaaaaaaaoa13 e i U ° T � pp Qie F r / c zRIO i°° P 9a el 9 i'' vl P h r e r l -rya? Ol G ii ''J' k z°' 7 I i p p B, C, & D — 43 � 7�P$a°5g7..@ l gg51'pSg 755 Z o o.i� : OFD '�w Ale •: `s 7 llane€liallil-11,119i1lepIld"71 U oSrT m Z�Q �� av= rA z5op� a =s.a,x.•.°..,....gesz.e,.,cr>.. � U `z off`_° aa • O(F11 ' 1qC <Z l l 1 Gl hx ', e6iu y ~Q _... m0 P h A Al6�G a I >¢ 6 of IZ _ § 9 7s[l€A aMll 01 ca Y It -fir; Joe El V Ell Ow L as "+F4 I � �l A �~' e• P �B � /•'g !1 . a,' 'S , � ¢moo I Mill;� �A� tpp � � �L_ � lk,, 9• if EEEE�Es ���; 6 It �. a � 011 1 € •� 551 d7 I1 8g3 1el i p 8IA gg'§ 1, I EP o l P, B, C, & D - 44 Z y yp�$w - ryJ Qd#p a °aNu�i W <z a .:. Uri u a m w YY - i—• — - LrQ �ve 1 g5Y51_� OR eP.YCC.......... z Om oo ♦F a W —_ a---1� _gyp �� ��9; y�;y,� .k•,:(,I`•`� .. _ ce I i I E Fi � Ei h5 .;: ... e -gill 2r I ------ - B, C, & D -45 00 a 9ggY`o e „§ __ }�i�1E�s�l§l��I@l�@ElF�[�'�$SYI�I�E9�E§If11 hE�E ° ,¢g , ° W i d � o � ♦-� � Uww} d 112 lit i it,; 5 �0C a IM,Z� a � dt� x [i yyW ^ GjEUo I I 4 pl[q lVi .4 > did III I �° 1112 QF6S T Q Lz U � .'^ rr---I- , 1 < e / W \ I I I f eii �o° r__J -7 0 t----r---I a r--�I1 I z}Q WLU N < o " of 1 n o 1 4 1 a I 1 III R;§ >mLL.1a: r^� I ` r 1VIII�GrrA fanws•xaakoq� � �-� � I � 7tI tpl 7. °§o � I • I • I:-.�I,�.;���5�.'Ip o l e 1 .g .1 o I,.^e I I � I _ I � II r 131 �. €• VPi W _ -t ....Of991 SON'al'-"YI �h_y- •.I I tI1 III • Le LU L-i--'--'-= 1 I— / 5� C ,1. ' t, 1.s_._�..q r• I� 111 ! V H m I. ws`,a, x,-z t"•'91 131 A e tl v z � - '` ci � e• " .+._t-a v..:a_• T`L I- , ICI - �Ye �Y€ >�e� 3¢3W CO .......?A4; yid - _ 1 ISI zn < °' !FR€19ed 55�i all \ unav�^ ISI -ivtirPrmrae- '-Ygg y FQ@€ES- >gi tF gg @ m{oceaLO'. �' I III uwvenumta ➢i s19 i °� F a s @E 9? . '� xn- w K-xweoLO ��gg §yyQ 8@ v 5 II rrry fiE IP B•2} @ §f}i .g<' _ _ -____awvavn -£ - CIb IIL-n•uanu-Y'9 if uYg E f 3 C§� e-e1sS iR@ A @.ss Q . a{ocAOLO pyY@- I¢ I ADYYHYJNR e• Y cC @ @° At +F IS @e Y3; @i Rtll9 3 op ^ 8 _ __ _ IM tll 113 III K-LR-LOCO Pea €-55" �` Y p®iR08g O°.C; travavn-�P-TY 11-_-___ if Ri 5 @IQ°}pp°°A�z24.3 @4 Olt, y ruos.toco 1 I I oil 6s -pe eF�;F F 7AAe°9�FiCIB( g 9 1s 9 ___ pi hf• `_ - wry B 1 1 I I �..gFf @!:F®�' tl�@;E r iE aF:egaY9p@i�•� 3g���a7 �1Iv�5:9 Q, rggqYg Ctl I� CC93E§a�@@�P6°i'a'F�� cp Nuvw LO xry ON 11 III a< W QQE` 6 �� J S Y°a.QP!lsii° Aslk E§SQ33iC:�°@ @QE52 ' e c-,`Tw N _ I ..._•\--____ i Td III <ss I tl e 1 IN;?� Y oL{OL[OLO I 99 Q@@ E gg°e Y pa @°° 'a E W FRFg�§§ I '1„ ,.firm " mumor eYr N.,= erilem --j I •t --te �'@F55�. �eps aRF pc o}�d q�VLq+ �${p i gipiP51 g ttiOL<OLO ,pgeF tlik Yep °`i i "• S�i °p °y � P9py §F91I§ @ . .. - - --__ xry I 1 Iq�noe°v_- e A § @ F@ - - g w G J J^E°°L-.-';°;s_:,°,,� I I f I•C."--•-a_in r j,�_•�•"�r',.l'ir"��IJr,_1 y_'-_r° _ -�__ -_-_� -h '' = _ 'I.P \-_wem-vI_uooa_r°tt ao a_kK{vtu oe�._wnm�_mrr_w vK a-_{n d=IeI_om r=ve ve_ '"�Y}g®�y@ iAE�3@$E�g�gg•° :;P5 95°�I e��py 55 E Y`E+lvgg I�e�.�Egg F �E•9e1°P�F�g@ Q s E a aoco � iE ee�P11vE@;1 @@; 5 F @EpjI §ggll A a 1111c lit--------o---- J IWOVA QS @1g}1�I1 'woe-Loo - 1 I,' p ptlA aoL.too F e§ =------------ 1 4 _ 0183n ro{o�to AEwvsnarK �nfi 4 e t I u WK140 11 11 �°5 •,I:.„ `Y \, io Ia -.', II Q @ -@g+ § 5 d F•g �' ______ -, -----_ N @I I _s phvav” is I 1 �_^_ II @ F e - §� QE i'v sC`P• ei e g j @@ § coiooaom ID -11 I• Qs3 Y. 3 51E SnNa Rnoaq @a :', h�1 - _ '..I xn. ?tiY., ICI. :\i z �_=_J '3 p3 BKq goe.o ;§ IN' II I•g & ® @ CF §e EE la° ° § E LC 1.% I JIM gtl}a aE„ Fla e E Q+@§ Is [ A �Y -_. I• .. . Aar.. L-- ��" $ ( p ji@ i- E1° II gy 'EEY a' °EF 5 i Q°§ - E E ��(Q�i Q B� §g '^ ° P� I'� '1 I I ,t -§� QQIe ,- p p pq � ¢ jeg[e g P�CBE�6Q�ttl �o i 1 i<o W�I lO c= S_31 S r; 1 f ml I'o 1 I '7 I o'" --------= ---------=----3171143nr ---_---_- r__tr__- ___>--^r1 _ I o o I-I I $04' @ o r< S Ixe°€Ixau�I�Ixa°� ( `$ i- 100" <hffi - g�l'�°QQI jtl8 °§@mccp�p9' T 2 00o S^ o-S5 II I n S5 P§@y§:Q€ �v 4 II°2rA ICI F----"--ai I @ +_ 9ii9�eE e § g H a�QHH §tle� _ J`L__ ALIYf-Ea>JNa 11 I �^__�__ JIt tlreI Nit. §sc QI gee L nmumcLe IM X1 11 I <95�gg 9F9 pp@p§pp1p§ sF P;Fif i @5 @@SF Yt X@�d'pp{saP @a@ Q3$9$9 AY1a> a{ec-Loco II I e ildi@3 E3eAVi}3 : Q!f a33as§9 §a F B, C, & D -46 • f- � p a lF Nil Si1fli1liHll11 F? 3l O P ;F i Z .�o.:'7 �e gQIC 6 p� 16S • M11111111161 MI11111 1'1 sw P�...�s..........'?.g. ' 0 _ �<�= 1z� $�$$,a� w II 5 V�a .b p ti ® o Q ¢0 Wa_____-_. . ........ ?- � S dW 'Eril � LM1�ypt�.p.�.<. _ W ✓� '+CYY?JCS' "P'�_^�_- _ _� _ ffi0 ° ! w Iggt ME { _ -pie rr, jai ._T '- `'. ,. 3 I �'� o P Y' — i 9 •o gill - I ��I` `Fti I � y ��' l: � .I• •I 1. � --� n— 3�g P 6 g��®s �= ` #I �"'ZV a I Rim, \\f� Ili,a'. ou53�� II I 13w II I F v I An€: ® p} gg ni g� ii its f .1 f":` S .�.:,' ' lu F --- o m6 b8 S III VIII Ie ,.I s" �_---sc 3&52 �5 II €. ` �9,- I � ee� s - o � .� IIII @I 811 I - "�° ci . \_. .\ ° l T___1_:' II. -- •i '` 3a' 9'v IBS - -il-•`' y9�• L'• o- e; 1 `- IA�; e ' �Jll me IN [.'•._ .16 &:6°a_ =1a e= ®54::. _ ',Igg �' . �oe _ 4^n JI. e• T I' "`O�u I�._�°. ___- J II � �I II In o .ter------------.1 ------------------- - - j.-- oN ° '< gy W2 && I I; II� 11 to V® o SSW I K �I � � I W �e �y Ilk Y� � i0 otll III I II Iz� 3-� �I >_ s :gelSpm 8$wi �gl > I � g gg °Wo„ ,�j11 Ike • c K >oi< Old �P!�I °o 13 ya @t Ipe Itl I Sc—'-� �Iq ill I�n � I ivlu°aeee nnwmeae a meremeee < I i II I� a AtW�rv�a�IADYVfeYJaee Amvvsnews_ Ip II I o.�„ WI Itl I t a I �vze I `> I I o"rk �I I I pis °`ice -- eSc. �� i < I i g ° r III l B, C, BD -47 9g d d Fi;Ai rm�YaQaR E a 3S3F0 P S a �- � e9{ts' OD Q rn e ga3 AAII SIM € Sp € : c2: `^�•7 �= s I e �TF\1 � 3➢cait- 54101111111 Sg a 5$ES S&§'39339993333395353Eae95 j ° z< mZOJ� � _ r O i G z o II ry f x CI r 9" _ a QZ I��I III�I�II�I�i K °. 5 l�u ll;ili �® .r y� ; MWo --- ' -- » ---^-- ,� Alt taa �� �y[ . Q / 1f d ' I ' @gH p d W 1vldP�m59tldA�1D'tlVt-3 sms 9MII SIRS ` I'•\, ( � � p gS@ - (� T�-�Ok9Sl��.k' 33iMMM°III Tp< � �� Ow A I p� ' Bs®F ° �ir) Z gI �r �ga a al. CO a^. HIP r! S n . ° a f5 n< �� W qq a W y. To K N I Vi $�l3< g2 .�W pBfi+� gW �7u 'gI Ig° uSl _ - _ 1 i sW�go-ge3g ge 'Jf9p�'3B €il ,nu.w11. = 4 gg pg � � -�_ __ __ - -�r .l ��.I• Jl�.itll ¢ Il Flge [. q 1r9 _' 1&� �"g rllll II g II 1 I�z 1C ___R �� �i .-<o°-' H Y o@ rl 6. . o spy •I� _ —__ ---_ ____-___-_ II x.q ;3 it II � R u� & i n II a °R Tq�'_,. • .:: tt t ' e f6`µ• F—I ��✓irr •r.v�u: 9 4°° U/ �� 'Ytt' 5, -�l- i -d � ~J;^�-�-,�!_._-�� i o� �iJ� •�^''_n, ASA � � �, / A --- --- __ -- _ __ / -;i•_-_�-_�� =�.._ , d Lh SIR B, C, & D -48 • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Tabe van der Zwaag February 14, 2012 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP - SUBTT18817 - HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC - A request to create a 94-lot tentative tract map on 11.7 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwellings per acre), located at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue - APN: 0207-201-01, 21 and 44. Related files: Development Review DRC2011-00641, Pre-Application DRC2010-00530, Development Review DRC2004-00705, and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17013. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. (Tabe/Willie) DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2011-00641- HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC - Architecture and Site Plan review of a 94-unit small lot multi-family residential subdivision on 11.7 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwellings per acre), located at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue - APN: 0207-201-01, 21 and 44. Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18817, Pre-Application DRC2010-00530, Development Review DRC2004-00705, and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17013. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. • Proiect Proposal: The 11.7-acre project site is located at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue. The site was previously approved for a 105-unit attached and detached residential development (DRC2004-00705). The proposed project will have a density of 8.03 units per acre, which is within the 8 to 14 dwelling units per acre permitted by the General Plan. All of the streets and sidewalks within the project will be privately maintained by a Home Owner's Association and will include on-street parking. The project will have 77 guest parking spaces, which far exceeds the minimum 24 parking spaces required by the Development Code. A Minor Exception for property line wall heights is necessary because of grade differences between the project site and the surrounding lots. The main vehicle access will be on Baker Avenue, with a secondary access on Arrow Route. The mobile home park to the north of the project site has an access easement across the site, and this access will be maintained with the residents of the mobile home park having access through the project site. The mobile home park currently drains across the site to a drainage facility located on the project to the east. This facility will no longer be necessary as the flows will be accommodated by the drainage facility of the project. The applicant will be required to remove the existing drainage facility and walls, which will increase the private yard areas on the neighboring lots. The project will consist entirely of detached two-story, small lot single-family residences. The project would not be able to meet the minimum density requirement with the inclusion of single-story homes. Two plans, however, will include a bedroom on the first floor. The Development Code requires that the Optional Development Standards be used when detached residences are developed within the Medium Development District. The Optional Development Standards require a minimum 30-foot front-to-front separation and a 15-foot side-to-side separation. • The project will consist of two housing types and four architectural styles, Spanish, Cottage, Craftsman, and Tuscan. There will be 86 zero lot line homes that will face landscaped paseos (units at the entrance of each paseo will face the street), with the garages accessed by a drive aisle at the rear of the units. EXHIBIT B B, C, BD -49 DRC ACTION AGENDA • SUBTT18817 AND DRC2011-00641 — HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC February 14, 2012 Page 2 The remainder of the units will consist of 8 center plot homes with the garages and the front entrances facing the drive aisle. The homes will range in size from 1,663 square feet to 2,000 square feet. The recreational amenities will include two swimming pools (adult and children's), a spa, a bathroom facility, and barbeque area with tables. There will also be a separate tot lot located within a large open grass area. A common seating area will be provided at the end of each paseo. Staff Comments: Staff is pleased with the overall design of the project, which meets all the requirements of the Development Code (except for the necessity for a Minor Exception for wall heights), including those outlined for projects developed under the Optional Development Standards. The applicant has done an excellent job providing a high level of detail evocative of the stated architectural styles and providing wall plane articulation and visual interest on all sides of each plan. Staff has two issues left unresolved. The first issue is whether a second-story pop-out is needed on the right elevation of Plan 4 (as shown on the enhanced right elevation on Sheet A4.3) The applicant feels that the covered porch provides adequate articulation for this elevation; staff feels that the additional pop-out will provide the level of articulation provided on all the other plans. The second issue is the applicant's choice of seating provided at the end of the paseos. Staff feels that a single bench is not adequate and recommends that the applicant provide an arched decorative seat wall. Major Issues: None. • Secondary Issues: 1. Whether a second-story pop-out is needed on the right elevation of Plan 4. 2. Whether the seating at the end of the paseos should be upgraded. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be approved with consideration given to the necessity of the recommended elevation change on Plan 4 and the paseo seating. Design Review Committee Action: The project was approved as presented with the applicant agreeing to make the two changes recommend by the staff planner: 1) to add a second story pop-out to the right elevation of Plan 4 and 2) to upgrade the seating areas at the end of the paseos to include a decorative seat wall. Members Present: Oaxaca, Wimberly, Granger Staff Planner: Tabe van der Zwaag • B, C, & D - 50 CITY OF RAKC�1C CLC.�Waui'�G� APR 0 9 2912 • Tammo T. Wilkens yy , �NING 8651 Foothill Blvd.. 9106 t ;_. Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91730 April 5, 2012 Re: DRC2011-0641 —Homescape Cucamonga, LLC Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Dear Mr. Troyer: am a resident of Space 106 in Casa Volante, which is the extreme South-East corner of Casa Volante Mobile Home Park and also adjacent to the Homescape project at Arrow and Baker. 1 wish to request that the Planning Department protect the following two items, which are considered existing conditions. 1 —24-hour access for entry and exit from Casa Volante Mobile Home Park to either Baker or • Arrow This is currently an easement granted by the property owner and it is considered essential by the residents of Casa Volante to have two points of entry and exit as Casa Volante is about '/ mile long in the North/South direction. At the same time, we wish to continue to restrict public access through the southern gate. At a hearing hosted by Hoescape on March 7, 2012, they indicated that they would be willing to work with us on the nature of the access. I believe that a motorized gate with remote controls would be most beneficial for the following reasons: a—The distribution of the remotes can be reasonably controlled and limited to Casa Volante residents. b— Requiring a driver to exit their car to push a button or swipe a coded card would be awkward, especially considering the age and numerous handicapped people in this senior community. I do not believe that a pole mounted card reader is practical considering the space limitations of existing parking and driveway configurations in Casa Volante at the two possible southern access points. c —A code activated gate would be too easily compromised as codes have a way of being given away. • d —A controlled gate will serve to limit public access and traffic through Casa Volante. Our streets are not designed for public traffic and the extra wear and tear would be a EXHIBIT C 10C B, C, BD- 51 significant burden on the owner of Casa Volante. and possibly on the residents if the extra street maintenance will be attempted to be passed on the residents. • 1 would therefore respectfully request that the Planning Department support these viewpoints and make the remote activated gate a requirement for at least one of the two planned access points between Homescape and Casa Volante. 2 d Drainage at the Fast side of the Homescape site Currently. there is a channel for drainage between the Casa Volante property and the Highbridge community property to the East. The elevation of this channel is approximately 3- 4 feet below the existing grade level of the proposed Homescape project. 1 would like to request that the Planning Department review this grading and assure that Homescape install drainage piping to handle any water flows at that elevation. I have enclosed a couple of pictures to illustrate the situation. �.. This picture shows the extreme SF comer of Casa Volante(the ` ►` concrete pad)and the wall on the \��\ West side of Highbridge. Please Q note the gap between, which is the w• i drainage channel 1 mention. The Casa Volante site elevation is near the top of the 6 or 7 foot wall of • the Highbridge property shown. This picture shows the same area but looking South along the Highbridge wall. It is a bit hard to see. but the Homescape current elevation is near the rocks and weeds at the right side of this picture. while the bush is growing out of the bottom of the drainage channel. This channel leads into the major runoff culvert intake further South. • 1 Homescape Hearing Letter.doc B, C, & D- 52 I plan to attend the public hearing on this project scheduled for April 25, 2012 to discuss these issues and would appreciate this being placed on the agenda. Please let me know if you have any questions in the meantime. You may contact me at 909-938- 1604 (cell). Sincerely. 6 Tammo T. Wilkens cc: File • • Homescape Hearing Letter.doc B, C, & D — 53 Print C=orm ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM s (Part I - Initial Study) City of Rancho Cucamonga (Please type or print clearly using ink. Use the tab key to move from one line to the next line.) Planning Department (909)477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies, Ordinances, and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. Upon review of the completed Initial Study Part I and the development application, additional information such as, but not limited to, traffic, noise, biological, drainage, and geological reports may be required. The project application will not be deemed complete unless the identified special studies/reports are submitted for review and accepted as complete and adequate. The project application will not be scheduled for Committees' review unless all required reports are submitted and deemed complete for staff to prepare the Initial Study Part II as required by CEQA. In addition to the filing fee, the applicant will be responsible to pay or reimburse the City, its agents, officers, and/or consultants for all costs for the preparation, review, analysis, recommendations, mitigations, etc., of any special studies or reports. • GENERAL INFORMATION: INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: The project has not been submitted and aquired an application number Project Title: Meridian Site Name &Address of project owner(s): Homescape Cucamonga LLC, Ta Jen Lee 650 W. Huntington Dr#210,Arcadia CA 91007 Name&Address of developer or project sponsor: Homescape Cucamonga LLC Ta Jan Lee 650 W. Huntington Dr#210., Arcadia CA 91007 • scape Cucamonga LLC 650 W. Huntington Dr#210.,Arcadia CA 91007 D EXHIBIT' nitial Study PaR7 doc Page 7 of 10 B, C, & D - 54 Name &Address of person preparing this form(if different from above): William Hezmalhalch Architects., Inc Chris Williams 2850 Redhill Ave., Santa Ana CA 92705 Telephone Number: 949-250-0607 PROJECT • ' 1 DESCRIPTION: Information indicated by an asterisk()is not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff '1; Provide a full scale (8-1/2 x 11)copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. 2; Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east, and west; views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site;and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location(describe): Northeast Corner of Arrow Route and Baker Ave 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers(attach additional sheet if necessary): 0207-201-01-0-000 • 0207-201-44-0-000, 0207-201-21-0-000 `5) Gross Site Area(adsq.ff.): 12.51 Acres "6) Net Site Area(total site size minus area of public streets&proposed 11 7 Acres dedications): 7 Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary): The current zoning /landuse on the project is Medium 8-11 du/ac. There will not be any changes to the zoning and general plan land use designations. • 8 Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental (:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Partt.doc Page 2 of 10 B, C, & D — 55 agencies in order to fully implement the project: • 9 Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals,mature trees,trails and roads,drainage courses,and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site(including age and condition)and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition,cite all sources of information(i.e.,geological and/or hydrologic studies,biotic and archeological surveys,traffic studies): The site contains no significant features. There are some mature trees with none of them being oak trees. The mature trees few and located along the perimeter of the proerty. Currently there is an access drive that connects the existing mbile home community from the North to Baker Ave. • 10, Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Cite all sources of information(books,published reports and oral history): There are no known cultural or historical aspects on this site. • 1\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Partt doc Page 3 of 10 B, C, & D - 56 11 Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site(aircraft,roadway noise,etc.)and how they will affect proposed uses: The noises that will affect the site are from Baker Ave. and Arrow Route. • Ultimately the site will not be affected by any surrounding street noises. 12 Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site to terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary. Please see attached sheet for community description • 13 Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use(residential,commercial,etc.),intensity of land use(one-family,apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.) and scale of development(height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): There are no cultural, historical or scenic aspects nearby. North: Residential South: Residential East: Residential West: Residential 14, Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale, or character of the surrounding general area of the project? The proposed project will not change the pattern, scale and character of the surrounding general area of the project • 1\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Parti.doc Page 4 of 10 B, C, & D - 57 15 Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated,including source and amount. How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses? What methods of soundproofing are proposed? • N.A. "16, Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees Two existing palm trees to be relocated to a proposed landscape area. 17, Indicate any bodies of water(including domestic water supplies)into which the site drains: N.A. • 18 Indicate expected amount of water usage (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at 987-2591. 47, 500 (500 GALLONS PER DAY) a. Residential(gal/day) Peak use(gal/Day) b. Commercial/Ind. (gaUday/ac) Peak use(gal/mir✓ac) 19 Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. ❑ Septic Tank ❑v Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification,please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at 987-2591. a. Residential(gal/day) 19 , 000 (200 GALLONS PER DAY) b. Commercial/Industrial(gal/day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20, Number of residential units:95 Detached(indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: The project will have lot sizes ranging in width from 40 to 50' and depths 75 to 89'typically. Product types will be drive court loaded product and conventionally loaded S.F.D. Attached(indicate whether units are rental or for sale units). • I.\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Partt.doc Page 5 of 10 B, C, & D -58 21 Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents: SalePrnce(s) $ to $MARKET WILL DETERMINE PRICE ONCE THE PROJECT• ' BUILT Rent(per month) $ to $ 22, Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: Plan 1, -1,675 s.f., 3 Bedroom, 2.5Bath, 2 Car Garage Plan 2, -1,750 s.f., 3 Bedroom, 2.5 Bath, 2 Car Garage Plan 3, - 1,815- 1,829 s.f., 4 Bedroom + Loft, 2.5 Bath, 2 Car Garage Plan 4, - 1,713 s.f., 3 Bedroom, 2.5 Bath, 2 Car Garage Plan 5, - 1,998 s.f., 4 Bedroom + Loft, 3 Bath, 2 Car Garage 23, Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: See Number 22 24 Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B: a. Elementary: b. Junior High: • c. Senior High _ COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25, Describe type of use(s)and major function(s)of commercial, industrial or institutional uses: Not Applicable 26, Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type: Not Applicable 27, Indicate hours of operation: Not Applicable 28) Number of employees: Total: Maximum Shift: Not Applicable • Time of Maximum Shift: 1\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Partt doc Page 6 of 10 B, C, & D - 59 29. Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications,including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate o hire for each classification(attach additional sheet if necessary): • Not Applicable 30, Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City. Not Applicable '31 For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type, and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should bf verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at(818) 572-6283): Not Applicable ALL PROJECTS 32, Have the water,sewer,fire,and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide • adequate service to the proposed project? If so, please indicate their response. City fire has been contacted for approval of access to the property. Burriec waste has also been contacted and have said that they can service the community. 33 In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials: Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include,but are not limited to PCB's;radioactive substances;pesticides an( herbicides;fuels,oils,solvents,and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, i known. Not Applicable • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Parti doc Page 7 of 10 B, C, & D - 60 34, Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use,storage,or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes,provide an inventory of all such materials to be used am proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown am • labeled on the application plans. The project will not involve the temporary or long-term use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials. 35 The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fee. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commissior✓Planning Director hearing: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability,that the facts, statements,and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief. 1 further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Date: Signature: 41��e�2s V � Title:Owner • • 1'\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Partl.doc Page 8 of 10 B, C, & D - 61 ATTACHMENT "A" • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED WATER USE AND SEWER FLOWS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT (Data Provided by Cucamonga Valley Water District February 2003) Water Usage Single-Family 705 gallons per EDU per day Multi-Family 256 gallons per EDU per day Neighborhood Commercial 1000 gal/day/unit (tenant) General Commercial 4082 gal/day/unit (tenant) Office Professional 973 gal/day/unit (tenant) Institutional/Government 6412 gal/day/unit (tenant) Industrial Park 1750 gal/day/unit (tenant) Large General Industrial 2020 gal/day/unit (tenant) Heavy Industrial (distribution) 1863 gal/day/unit (tenant) Sewer Flows • Single-Family 270 gallons per EDU per day Multi-Family 190 gallons per EDU per day General Commercial 1900 gal/day/acre Office Professional 1900 gal/day/acre Institutional/Government Industrial Park 3000 gal/day/acre Large General Industrial 2020 gal/day/acre Heavy Industrial (distribution) 1863 gal/day/acre Source: Cucamonga Valley Water District Engineering & Water Resources Departments, Urban Water Management Plan 2000 • I\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Partl.doc Page 9 of 10 B, C, 8, D — 62 ATTACHMENT B Contact the school district for your area for amount and payment of school fees: • Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Line Road, Suite F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-8942 Etiwanda 6061 East Avenue P.O. Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909)899-2451 High School • Chaffey High School 211 West 5th Street Ontario, CA 91762 (909)988-8511 • (:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Partl.doc Page 10 of 10 B, C, & D — 63 City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: DRC2011-00641 — Design Review for 94 Multi-Family Units and Tentative Tract Map— SUBTT18817 2. Related Files: Minor Exception - DRC2011-00892, and Tree Removal Permit- DRC2011-00891 3. Description of Project: DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2011-00641- HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC - Architecture and site plan review of a 94-unit, small lot multi-family residential subdivision on 11.7 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwellings per acre) located at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue - APN 0207-201-01, 21 and 44. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Homescape Cucamonga, LLC 650 West Huntington Drive, Suite 210 Arcadia, CA 91007 S. General Plan Designation: Medium Residential • 6. Zoning: Medium Residential 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The project site is vacant land and is surrounded by a mix of vacant land, single-family homes, multi-family homes and mobile homes. The site has a number of mature trees and has been regularly cleared of weeds and brush. The mobile home park to the north drains across the site to a drainage facility along the east property line. The mobile home park also has a vehicle access easement across the site. North - Single-family Homes and Mobile Home Parks; Low-Medium and Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) South- Single-family and Multi-Family Residences; Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) East - Single-family and Multi-Family Residences; Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) West - Single-family and Multi-Family Residences; Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Tabe van der Zwaag (909)477-2750 • 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): N/A B, C, & D — 64 Initial Study for DRC2011-00641 & SUBTT18817 City of Rancho Cucamonga HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC Page 2 GLOSSARY-The following abbreviations are used in this report: • CVWD - Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR- Environmental Impact Report FEIR- Final Environmental Impact Report FPEIR - Final Program Environmental Impact Report NPDES - National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx- Nitrogen Oxides ROG- Reactive Organic Gases PMZ 5-Course Particulate Matter PM10- Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB- Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD- South Coast Air Quality Management District SWPPP-Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G-Urban Emissions Model 7G ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a 'Potentially Significant Impact," 'Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or"Less Than-Significant-Impact' as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (✓) Aesthetics (✓)Agricultural Resources (✓)Air Quality (✓) Biological Resources (✓) Cultural Resources (✓) Geology & Soils (✓) Greenhouse Gas ( ) Hazards &Waste Materials (✓) Hydrology & Water Quality Emissions ( ) Mineral Resources (✓) Noise • ( ) Land Use & Planning ( ) Public Services ( ) Recreation ( ) Population & Housing ( ) Utilities & Service Systems ( ) Mandatory Findings of ( ) Transportation/Traffic Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: (X) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Prepared B r/h l� F P Y �-'r Date: �� i Reviewed By: Date: 3I 5 11 z • Rev. 9/2011 B, C, & D - 65 Initial Study for DRC2011-00641 & SUBTT18817 City of Rancho Cucamonga HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA. LLC Page 3 • Less Than S.'Pfioarn Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Nth man SipmLcant maigat'Pn Si Bmnranl No Impact Inc__ Impact Impact EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? O O O (✓) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? C) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site. The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Figure LU-6. b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State • Scenic Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C) The site is located on the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue. It is characterized by single-family and multi-family residences to the north, south, east and west. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of the project, as the project will be detached residences of a similar density to the surrounding developments and design review is required prior to approval. City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. d) The project would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity. The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans which require review for consistency with City standards including shielding, diffusing or the use of indirect lighting to avoid glare. Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the project site. The impact is not considered significant. 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program. of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) • Williamson Act contract? Rev 9/2011 B, C, & D -66 Initial Study for DRC2011-00641 & SUBTT18817 City of Rancho Cucamonga HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC Page 4 Less Tnan • significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentally wnn Tnan Signihwnl md'g p SigMU:anl No Impact InCOIpOleletl mpBtl mpdd C) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoing of, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓ ) forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220 (g), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104 (g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) land to non-forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? Comments: a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The site is located northeast corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue and is characterized by single-family and multi-family residential development to the north, south, east and west. There are approximately 209 acres of Farmland of Local Importance, Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga according to the General Plan and the California • Department of Conservation Farmland Map (2010). Concentrations of Important Farmland are sparsely located in the southern and eastern parts of the City, an area that is characterized by existing and planned development. Farmland in the southern portion of the City is characterized by industrial, residential, and commercial land uses. Farmland in the eastern portion of the City is within the Etiwanda area and planned for development. Further, a large number of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan FPEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. C) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related to the conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. No mitigation is required. d) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related of the loss or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. e) The site is located northeast corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue and is • characterized by single-family and multi-family residential development to the north, south, east and west. The nearest agricultural use is more than 1 mile to the northwest of the project site. Furthermore, there are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that Rev 9/2011 B, C, & D — 67 Initial Study for DRC2011-00641 8, SUBTT18817 City of Rancho Cucamonga HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC Page 5 • Less Than SIBnii Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources. P.I.Noli, Wm man SIgmOCant Mlegaoon SIBOI�ICaN No Im0ac1 Inwrpora�ed Im ad Im aG qualify as forest land Therefore, there is no potential for conversion of forest land to a non-forest use. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute O (✓) O ( ) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of O O O (✓) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) • number of people? Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.3), the proposed project would not interfere with the region's ability to comply with Federal and State air quality standards for Criterion 1 Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations (local air quality impacts) or Criterion 2 Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP (consistency with the 2003 AQMP). Therefore the project is consistent with the 2003 AQMP and is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) Both the State of California and the Federal Government have established health-based ambient air quality standards (AAQS) for seven air pollutants. These pollutants include ozone (03), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NOZ), sulfur dioxide (S02), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PM,o), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM25) microns in diameter and lead. Among these pollutants, ozone and particulate matter (PM10 and PM25) are considered regional pollutants while the others have more localized effects. In addition, the State of California has set standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide (1-12S), vinyl chloride and visibility reducing particles These standards are designed to protect the health and welfare of the populace with a reasonable margin of safety. The City of Rancho Cucamonga area is within the South Coast Air Basin, which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) The California Clean Air Act (CCAA) provides the SCAQMD with the authority to manage transportation activities at indirect sources. Indirect sources of pollution are generated when minor sources collectively emit a substantial amount of pollution. Examples of this • include motor vehicles at an intersection, a mall and on highways SCAQMD also regulates stationary sources of pollution within in jurisdictional area. Direct emissions from motor vehicles are regulated by the Air Resources Board (ARB). Rev. 9/2011 B, C, & D — 68 Initial Study for DRC2011-00641 & SUBTT18817 City of Rancho Cucamonga HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC Page 6 Less Than • &gndicam Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotenneOy wan men Signdmanl Mibgaiion Slgn,finenl No Im act Inver waled Im aci Im ad The combination of topography, low mixing height, abundant sunshine, and emissions from the second largest urban area in the United States gives the Basin the worst air pollution problem in the nation. The Basin experiences a persistent temperature inversion (increasing temperature with increasing altitude); this inversion (coupled with low wind speeds) limits the vertical dispersion of air contaminants, holding them relatively near the ground. Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) of 1970, the EPA established national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for six major pollutants, termed criteria pollutants. ozone (03), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PM10), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PMZ,5) microns In diameter, carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SOZ), and lead. Criteria pollutants are defined as those pollutants for which the Federal and State Governments have established AAQS, or criteria, for outdoor concentrations in order to protect public health. Data collected at permanent monitoring stations are used by the EPA to classify regions as "attainment" or "non-attainment" depending on whether the regions met the requirements stated in the primary NAAQS. Nonattainment areas have additional restrictions as required by the EPA. The EPA has designated the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) responsible for ensuring the Basin's compliance with the FCAA. The South Coast • Air Basin is in Non-Attainment Status for Ozone, PM10 and PM2.5 Specific criteria for determining whether the potential air quality impacts of a project are significant are set forth in the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook. The criteria include daily emissions thresholds, compliance with State and national air quality standards, and consistency with the current AQMP. As prescribed by SCAQMD, an air impact study was prepared by Chambers Group, Inc. (June 2011) that utilizes the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) Version 2011.1.1 to evaluate short- term construction emissions and short-term construction emissions for localized significant thresholds, long-term operational emissions, operation emissions for localized significant thresholds, and Green House Gas Emissions. Short Term (Construction) Impacts Equipment Exhausts and Related Construction Activities Construction activities produce combustion emissions from various sources such as site grading, utility engines, on-site heavy-duty construction vehicles, asphalt paving, and motor vehicles transporting the construction crew. Exhaust emissions from construction activities envisioned on site would vary daily as construction activity levels change. The use of construction equipment on site would result in localized exhaust emissions. Fugitive Dust Fugitive dust emissions are generally emissions associated with land clearing and exposure of soils to the air and wind, and cut-and-fill grading operations. Dust generated during construction varies substantially on a project-by project basis, depending on the • level of activity, the specific operation and weather conditions at the time of construction. Construction emissions can vary greatly depending on the level of activity, the specific operations taking place, the equipment being operated, local soils, weather conditions and Rev. 9/2011 B, C, & D — 69 Initial Study for DRC2011-00641 & SUBTT18817 City of Rancho Cucamonga HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC Page 7 • Less Than S,pnlficant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially wnh Tnan S,gnNCant Mitigation 51pn14oant No TOaLY InfAfDMBtatl n108d mvae other factors. The proposed project will be required to comply with SCACIMD Rules 402 and 403 to control fugitive dust which will decrease the PM,0 and PMZ S to levels below the LST Tresholds. Estimated Construction Emissions e, • e e � e 1 Site Preparation-On-Site 8.21 65.45 37.45 . 0.05 15.62 10.2D Site Preparation-Off-Site 0.11 0.12 1.34 0.00 0.24 0.02 Building Construction-On-Site 6.11 40.22 24.03 0.04 2.80 2.80 Building Construction-Off-Site 0.42 2.24 4.03 0.00 0.70 0.10 • Project Maximum Daily-2011 14.85 108.03 66.86 0.11 19.36 13.12 SCAQMD Daily Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No No LST Threshold - 270 2,193 - 16 9 Exceeds Threshold? N/A No No N/A Yes Yes alum Building Construction-On-Site 5.63 37.37 23.73 0.04 2.54 2.54 Building Construction-Off-Site 0.38 2.05 3.68 0.00 0.69 0.10 Paving-On-Site 2.93 17.81 10.54 0.02 1.56 1.56 Paving-Off-Site 0.06 0.06 0.65 0.00 0.13 0.01 Architectural Coating-On-Site 67.34 3.16 1.96 0.00 0.29 0.29 Architectural Coating-Off-Site 0.05 0.05 0.57 0.00 0.11 0.01 Project Maximum Daily-2012 70.38 5728 38.60 0.07 4.92 4.22 SCAQMD Daily Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No No LST Threshold -- 270 2,193 -- 16 9 • Exceeds Threshold? N/A No No N/A No No Rev. 9/2011 B, C, & D - 70 Initial Study for DRC2011-00641 & SUBTT18817 City of Rancho Cucamonga HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC Page 8 Less Than • Signdiwnt Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources. Petantlalty wnh Then Sighih,aht M,t,p,.n Signdcant No Impad Inw=,nad Imp= Im ' Architectural Coatings Architectural coatings contain VOCs that are similar to ROCs and are part of the 03 precursors There will be residential buildings proposed for the project. Based on the proposed project, it is estimated that the proposed buildings will result in approximately 73 04 Ibs of VOC per day during the coating phase The emissions would occur after grading activities, near the end of the construction period. Therefore, this VOC emission is the principal air emission and is less than the SCAQMD VOC threshold of 75 Ibs/day. Odors Heavy-duty equipment in the project area during construction would emit odors. However, the construction activity would cease to occur after individual construction is completed. No other sources of objectionable odors have been identified for the proposed project, and no mitigation measures are required. In compliance with SCAQMD Rule 402 the proposed uses are not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors. Therefore, objectionable odors posing a health risk to potential on-site and existing off-site uses would not occur as a result of the proposed project. Naturally Occurring Asbestos The proposed project is located in San Bernardino County, and it is not among the • counties that are found to have serpentine and ultramafic rock in their soils. In addition, there has been no serpentine or ultramafic rock found in the project area. Therefore, the potential risk for naturally occurring asbestors (NOA) during project construction is small and less than significant. 2010 General Plan FPEIR Air Quality Analysis and Mitigation Measures (short term) Short Term (Construction) Emissions - Continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a project- specific basis and in conformance with the General Plan FPEIR. Therefore, the following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the • construction site for City verification. Rev. 9/2011 B, C, & D - 71 Initial Study for DRC2011-00641 & SUBTT18817 City of Rancho Cucamonga HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC Page 9 • ess Than 9gnifcanl Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: '°'antu nr win Than Sigrnbcant Mlt' aU.o Sgo&6 nt No Impen Inm orates Imoan Impart 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PMID emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMip emissions. • 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. Rev. 9/2011 B, C, & D - 72 Initial Stud for DRC2011-00641 & SUBTT18817 City of Rancho Cucamonga HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC Page 10 Less Than • Signihran, Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than S,gm4cant Kwawn 9gmLcant No traced InCA(pIXa�etl nlpdtt ltipaCl 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan (FPEIR), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Ozone (03), and Particulate Matter (PM25 and PM10) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance; therefore, they would all be cumulatively considerable if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. Long Term (Operational) Impacts Operational emissions shown in the following table were calculated using the CalEEMod to account area, energy and mobile source emissions. Because the majority of the emissions are attributable to on-road vehicles, the LST methodology in not appropriate and emissions were not compared to LSTs. 'a • a a Mobile 6.21 17.11 31.77 0.10 11.23 1.03 • Energy 0.11 0.97 0.41 0.01 0.08 0.08 Area 4.21 0.10 8.19 0.00 0.17 0.17 Project Total 10.53 18.18 70.37 0.11 11.48 1.28 SCAQMD Daily Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Exceed Thresholds? No No No No No No Long Term Project Operational Emissions Long-term air pollutant emission impacts are those associated with stationary sources and mobile sources Involving any project-related changes. The proposed project would result in a net increase in the number of residents in the project area; therefore, the proposed project would result in net increases In both stationary and mobile source emissions. The stationary source emissions would come from additional natural gas consumption for on-site buildings and electricity for the lighting in the buildings and at the parking area. According to the CARB transportation performance standards, the rate of growth in vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and trips should be held to the rate of population growth (SCAQMD 2006) Compliance with this performance standard is one way suggested by CARB of showing compliance with the growth assumptions used in the AQMP. If the total VMT generated by the proposed project at build-out is at or below that predicted by the AQMP, then the proposed project's mobile emissions is consistent with the AQMP. As the 11.7 acres project site is an infill residential project that is in a predominantly residential neighborhood, the project Is not significantly different from what was appropriately assumed for the site in any growth rate or trip generation assumptions. Therefore the proposed project would result in less than significant impacts and no mitigation measures • are necessary. Rev. 9/2011 B, C, & D - 73 Initial Study for DRC2011-00641 & SUBTT18817 City of Rancho Cucamonga HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC Page 11 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources. Potantmy with an Significant Mingabon SIgmOCant No Impact Inwryoretee Imoed Imoect 2010 General Plan FPEIR Air Quality Analysis and Mitigation Measures (long term) Long Term (Operational) Emissions - The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan FPEIR; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: 10) Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. 11) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 12) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. 13) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 14) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water • consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 15) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 16) All residential structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low- polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 17) All residential structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.3). C) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 4.3), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The project proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, • retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 114 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is located within 114 mile Rev. 9/2011 B, C, & D - 74 Initial Study for DRC2011-00641 & SUBTT18817 City of Rancho Cucamonga HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC Page 12 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources' PatanbeVy wnn Then Significant Mlbgebpn Slgraficant No Impact Ineomocatetl ImpaG ImpaG of a sensitive receptor Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed under b) above and the following mitigation measure will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels. 18) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. e) Construction Odors (Short-term) may include odors associated with equipment use including diesel exhaust or roofing, painting and paving. These odors are temporary and would dissipate rapidly. Operation Odors (Long-term) are typically associated with the type of use. Odors from residential uses would be like cooking and gardening. Similarly common odors associated with mixed-use and commercial land uses would be expected (i.e. restaurants). Local odors from the majority of land uses would be similar to other urban areas and would not be considered significant. Industrial uses could create objectionable odors and therefore are located away from residential uses and sensitive receptors. Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. • 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or O (✓) O ( ) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? C) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc ) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) • protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Rev. 9/2011 B, C, & D — 75 Initial Study for DRC2011-00641 & SUBTT18817 City of Rancho Cucamonga HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC Page 13 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With han SlgMiamt Mitigation StgM¢enl No Imoaa I----------- Imoaa Imoaa f) Conflict with the provisions of an adapted Habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments: a) The project site is located in an area developed with residential uses. The site has been previously disrupted during annual dlscing for weed abatement. According to the General Plan Figure RC-4, and Section 4 4 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. Additionally, a Biological Reconnaissance Survey was performed on the site (Chambers Group, November 11, 2011). The survey resulted in the following conclusions and recommendation: Special Status Plants: Thirty-two of the thirty-nine special status plans species known to occur within the vicinity of the project site are considered absent due to lack of suitable habitat. The remaining 7 species have a low to moderate potential to occur on the project site. None of these remaining 7 special status plants are Federal and/or State listed • endangered or threatened; therefore, no further surveys for special status plant species are required at this time. Special Status Wildlife Species: Forty-four of the fifty-three special status wildlife species known to occur within the vicinity of the project site are considered absent due to lack of suitable habitat. The remaining 9 special status wildlife species have a low to high potential to occur on the project site. Eight of the nine remaining special status wildlife species are not Federal and/or State listed endangered or threatened; therefore, protocol level focused studies are not required at this time. There is, though, a high potential for the burrowing owl to occur on the site. Although burrowing owls are not Federal or State listed as endangered or threatened, this species is listed as California Species of Concern (CSC). While the majority of CSC listed species do not typically require focused surveys, specific focused survey protocol for the burrowing owl has been developed by the California Burrowing Owl Consortium and adopted by the California Department of Fish and Game; therefore, protocol level surveys for the burrowing owl are required prior to ground disturbing activity. 1) A protocol level burrowing owl survey shall be performed prior to the approval of a rough grading permit. b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities. No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the project will not have any impacts. C) No wetland habitat is present on-site. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. • d) The City is primarily located in an urban area that does not contain large, contiguous natural open space areas. Wildlife potentially may move through the north/south trending tributaries in the northern portion of the City and within the Sphere of Influence. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev. 9/2011 B, C, & D — 76 . Initial Study for DRC2011-00641 & SUBTT18817 City of Rancho Cucamonga HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC Page 14 Less Than • S"necant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources. Potentially wen Teen S,gndcant Mitigation Sipn,fi.nl No Impact lowfppfatBO tnpaCl Inlpad e) There are heritage trees on the project site. Any trees meeting the City's Heritage Tree Preservation Ordinance are required to be replaced on site. An Arborist report (Professional Design Associates, April 2011) was completed for the project site. The report concluded that 11 trees will be affected by the project. Preservation of trees on site will not be an option due to mass grading on the site. The project design includes a conceptual Landscape Plan showing far more new trees to be planted than currently exist on site and consistent with the number required by City ordinance. Therefore, the proposed project is not in conflict with any local ordinance. f) Neither the City nor the SOI are within an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved State Habitat Conservation Plan area. The project site is not located within a local conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Figure RC-1. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to • § 15064.5? C) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature? J) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: a) The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). There will be no impact. b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6). Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Cultural Resources based on the future build out of the City. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or • significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Rev. 9/2011 B, C, & D - 77 Initial Study for DRC2011-00641 & SUBTT18817 City of Rancho Cucamonga HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC Page 15 • Lass Then Significant Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources. Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant he Impact Incur oratetl Impact Imoact • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying a in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. C) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the research performed at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or • resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Sphere-of- Influence, including the project site;'however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per the Public Safety Element of the General Plan; therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. is Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • is Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). Rev. 9/2011 B, C, & D — 78 Initial Study for DRC2011-00641 & SUBTT18817 City of Rancho Cucamonga HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA. LLC Page 16 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources. Potentially with Than S,gndmsnt Mitigation Slgmhcanl No impact nCAm Impact Imoacl act • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed project is in an area that has already been disturbed by development. The project site has been disrupted by construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments/annual discing for weed abatement. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required,in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project. a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) • delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault'? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) liquefaction? iv) Landslides? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) C) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: • a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the Rev. 9/2011 B, C, & D — 79 Initial Study for DRC2011-00641 & SUBTT18817 City of Rancho Cucamonga HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC Page 17 • Less Than SipZ"; ra Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potenhalty m Than Significant MNpaaon s'—fie' No Impact t------ratetl Imoect Im act General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 5.1 of the General Plan FEIR. The Red Hill Fault, passes within 1 5 mile north of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 5 miles north. These faults are both capable of producing M,,,6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto Fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7.5 earthquakes is 15 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas Fault, capable of up to M, 8.2 earthquakes, is 17 miles northeasterly of the site Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant. b) The City of Rancho Cucamonga is within a designated Soil Erosion Control Area (Exhibit 4 7-4 of the General Plan FPEIR). The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control, however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with • SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce 12111110 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM1p emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. C) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.7) indicates that there is a potential for the hillside areas at the northern end of the City and in the SOI for slope failure, landslides, and/or erosion. Areas subject to slope instability contain slopes of 30 percent or greater. Landslides may be induced by seismic activity, rain, or construction. The City Hillside Development Regulations prohibits the development within slopes of 30 percent or greater and limit the number of units that could be constructed within the Hillside Residential and Very Low Density Residential designations in the Hillside areas. The site is not within an Earthquake hazard zone or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-2. Soil types on-site consist of Tujunga Gravelly Loamy Sand Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3 No adverse impacts are anticipated. • d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Tujunga Gravelly Loamy Sand Soil association according to General Plan Rev 9/2011 B, C, & D - 80 Initial Study for DRC2011-00641 & SUBTT18817 City of Rancho Cucamonga HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC Page 18 Lm Than • &gmM1ram Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources. Poian°ally with Tna^ Sipmficam Khwh.n Sight C. No Impaq Inc-- ------ Im act Im act FPEIR Exhibit 4 7-3. These soils typically have very slow runoff. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Comments: a) Regulations and Significance-The Federal Government began studying the phenomenon of global warming as early as 1979 with the National Climate Protection Act(92 Stat. 601). In June of 2005, Governor Schwarzenegger established California's Green House Gas ("GHG") emissions reduction target in Executive Order (EO) S-3-05. The EO created • goals to reduce GHG emissions for the State of California to 2000 levels by 2010; GHG emissions reduced to 1990 levels by 2020; and GHG emissions reduced to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Additionally, on December 7, 2009 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) issued findings regarding GHGs under rule 202(a) of the Clean Air Act. (1) that GHGs endanger human health; and (2) that this will be the first steps to regulating GHGs through the Federal Clean Air Act. The USEPA defines six key GHGs (carbon dioxide [COZ], methane [CH4], nitrous oxide [NZO], hydroflourocarbons [HFCs], perflourocarbons [PFCs], and sulfur hexafluoride [SF6]). The combined emissions of these well-mixed greenhouse gases from new motor vehicles and engines contribute to GHG pollution. The western states, including Arizona, California, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, and Washington, already experience hotter, drier climates. California is a substantial contributor of GHGs and is expected to see an increase of three to four degrees Fahrenheit (OF) over the next century. Assembly Bill (AB) 32 requires that the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the lead agency for implementing AB 32, determine what the statewide GHG emission level was in 1990 and approve a statewide GHG emissions limit (427 million metric tons of COZ equivalent) to be achieved by 2020 and prepare a Scoping Plan to outline the main strategies for meeting the 2020 deadline. Significant progress can be made toward the 2020 goal through existing technologies and improving the efficiency of energy use. Other solutions would include improving the State's infrastructure, and transitioning to cleaner and more efficient sources of energy. The ARB estimates that 38 percent of the State's GHG emissions in 2004 was from transportation sources followed by electricity generation (both in-State and out-of-State) at • 28 percent and industrial at 20 percent. Residential and commercial activities account for 9 percent, agricultural use at 6 percent, high global warming potential gases at 3 percent, and recycling and waste at 1 percent. Rev. 9/2011 B, C, & D - 81 Initial Study for DRC2011-00641 & SUBTT18817 City of Rancho Cucamonga HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA. LLC Page 19 • Less Ten Signie�arn Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PoiBnha11Y With Than SigmLCant Mitigation S" _,t No Impaq Incorporetetl Imoect Imoatl It Is not anticipated that any single development project would have a substantial effect on global climate change but that GHG emissions from the project would combine with emissions across California, the United States, and the world to cumulatively contribute to global climate change. Therefore, consistent with the ARB's Climate Change Scoping Plan, the proposed project was evaluated for consistency with the Early Action Measures (Scoping Plan is a recommendation until adopted through normal rulemaking). The proposed project is assessed by determining its consistency with the 37 Recommended Actions identified by ARB. In compliance with Senate Bill (SB) 97 and CEQA, the project has been analyzed based on a performance based standard (CEQA 15064.4) Additionally, the ARB was directed through SB 375 to develop regional GHG emission reduction targets to be achieved within the automobile and light truck sectors for 2020 and 2035. SCAQMD and ARB maintain ambient air quality monitoring stations in the Basin. The stations closest to the project site are the Upland station and the Fontana-Arrow Highway station. The Upland station monitors all criteria pollutant except PM10, PM2,5, and S02 which are monitored at the Fontana-Arrow Highway station. The ambient air quality in the project area for CO, NO2, and SOz are consistently below the relevant State and Federal standards (based on ARB and EPA from 2007, 2008, and 2009 readings). Ozone, PMio, and PMZ,S levels all exceed State and Federal standards regularly. • Proiect Related Sources of GHGs- Based on the Guidelines for the Implementation of California Environmental Quality Act, Appendix G, a project would normally be considered to have a significant effect on air quality if the project would violate any ambient air quality standards, contribute substantially to an existing air quality violation, expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, or conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community. However, neither the CEQA statutes, Office of Planning and Research (OPR) guidelines, nor the draft proposed changes to the CEQA Guidelines prescribe thresholds of significance or a particular methodology for performing an impact analysis. Significance criteria are left to the judgment and discretion of the Lead Agency. Project related GHGs would include emissions from direct and indirect sources. Based on the Air Quality Analysis prepared by Chambers Group (June 2011) using the CaIEEMod methodology, the project would result in the emissions of 687 MTCOZeq/yr from construction activities and 544 MTCOzeq/yr from area sources and 1,418 MTCOZeq/yr from mobile sources. Total project related direct operational emission would result in 1,962 MTCO2eq/yr. Since the SCAQMD proposes that if a project generates GHG emissions below 3,000 ICOZe, it could be concluded that the project's GHG contribution is not "cumulatively considerable' and is therefore less than significant under CEQA. The 2,649 tons of COZe from the project translates to only 0 00055 percent of the total COZe emissions for the State in 2004. • Rev. 9/2011 B, C, & D - 82 Initial Study for DRC2011-00641 8. SUBTT18817 City of Rancho Cucamonga HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC Page 20 Lass Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: potentially With nan Significant Mitigation Sign,Lcant No Impact lr.2E.led Impact Impatt Direct-Mobile(Construction) 687 Direct-Mobile(operational) 1,418 Direct-Stationary 71 indirect-Purchased Electricity(Power) 407 Indirect-Purchased Electricity(Water) 42 Indirect-Cogeneration 0 Direct-Manufacturing 0 Direct-Fugitive-Solid Waste 21 Direct-Fugitive-HVAC 3 TOTAL 2,649 5ource.CGI 2011 Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions - The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.5) indicates that GHG emissions result from construction activities associated with diesel- powered construction equipment and other combustion sources (i.e. Generators, workers vehicles, material delivery, etc.). The GHG emitted by construction equipment is primarily carbon dioxide (CO2). The highest levels of construction related GHGs occur during site • preparation including demolition, grading and excavation. Construction related GHGs are also emitted from off-site haul trucks and construction workers traveling to the job site. Exhaust emissions from construction activities would vary each day with the changes in construction activity on site. The combustion of fossil-based fuels creates GHGs such as CO2, Cho, and N20. CH4 is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than- significant levels: 1. The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2. The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures specification. 3. Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4. Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. 5. Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6. Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for construction crew. • Rev 9/2011 B, C, & D — S3 Initial Study for DRC2011-00641 & SUBTT18817 City of Rancho Cucamonga HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC Page 21 • Less Then Bigmhoam Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources. Potentially with Then GigrnBcent Mnipi Significant No Impact In ------ ImpaG Impact Long Term (Operational) GHGs Emissions - The primary source of GHG emissions generated by-the proposed project would be from motor vehicles, combustion of natural gas for space and water heating, as well as off-site GHG emissions from generation of electricity consumed by the proposed land use development over a long term CEQA requires the Lead Agency to review the project for "adequacy, completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure," to determine potential impacts of GHGs. Therefore the project has been analyzed based on methodologies and information available to the City at the time this document was prepared. Estimates are based on past performance and represent a scenario that is a worst case with the understanding that technology changes may reduce GHG emissions in the future. To date, there is no established quantified GHG emission threshold. The project Involves the construction of 94 single-family residences and therefore would result in a net Increase of both stationary and mobile source emissions. The majority of energy consumption typically occurs during project operation (more than 80 percent and less than 20 percent during construction activities). The proposed project will incorporate several design features that are consistent with the California Office of the Attorney General's recommended measures to reduce GHG emission including: energy efficiency, renewable energy and energy storage, water conservation, solid waste measures, land use measures, transportation and motor vehicles, agricultural and forestry and off-site mitigation. The project is located near existing transit lines; because it is an infill project; it • is required to install water efficient landscaping pursuant to the City's Development Code; and, will participate in the City's waste reduction and recycling programs. The project is consistent with the California Environmental Protection Agency Climate Action Team proposed early action measures to mitigate climate change included in the CARB Scoping Plan mandated under AB 32. The table below (Chambers Group, June 2011) illustrates project compliance with GHG emission reduction strategies outlined by the California Climate Action Team. Additionally, the City is participating In the development of a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) with SANBAG for the San Bernardino County area pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 375. Call Air Vehicle Climate Change Compliant The vehicles that access the protect will be in Resources Board Standards compliance with any vehicle standards that CARB proposes _ Diesel Anti-idling Compliant. CARS's Airborne Toxic Control Measure to III Diesel- Fueled Commercial Motor Vehicle Idling ensures that diesel trucks accessing the project site would not idle. Heavy-Duty Vehicle Compliant.These are CARS-enforced standards;vehicles that Emission Reduction access the project that are required to comply with the standards Measures will comply with the strategy. Achieve 50 Percent Compliant. The Project will be subject to the City's waste Statewide Recycling reduction and recycling programs as managed by the City's Goat Environmental Programs Section. Depanment of Urban Forestry Compliant. Pursuant to the CItWs Development Code Chapter Forestry 17.42,landscaping will include drought tolerant trees,shrubs,and grouhdcwer. Uepanmemof Water Use Efficiency Compliant. Pursuant to the City's Development Code Chapter Water Resources 1742,the project will be required to have water efficient landscaping, California Energy Building Energy Compliant. Th.City's Cnergy Efficrency Program and Renewable Commission Efficiency Standards Energy Program,managed by the Municipal Utility,would provide • monetary incentives In the form of rebates to assist the project In _. being more energy efficient, Shun..CGI 2011 Rev. 9/2011 B, C, 8F D — 84 Initial Study for DRC2011-00641 & SUBTT18817 City of Rancho Cucamonga HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC Page 22 Lass Then • Sigrnficanl Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Ppfemi•oy wm than SigniUCanl MiliBeOOn Signd¢ant No ImpdCl Into elet m pcl mpoL( The project's long term operation emissions will contribute to area pollutants but will not exceed any of the SCAQMD's thresholds. The proposed project would have less than a significant long term impact with the following mitigation measures: 1. Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC) materials. 2. Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: • Increased insulation, • Limit air leakage through the structure, • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances, • Landscape and developed site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping, • • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems, • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements, • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 3. • Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non-vegetated surfaces. 4. Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and • exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Rev. 9/2011 B, C, & D — 85 Initial Study for DRC2011-00641 & SUBTT18817 City of Rancho Cucamonga HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC Page 23 • Less Then S,gh&,cant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources' Pmemialy With an S,gnihwnt Ma,ganon SiQnibcern No Imoad Incor oretetl Im aq Im ad b) The project proposes the construction of 94 single-family residents. No other applicable plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emission apply to the project. The 2010 General Plan Update included adopted policies and Standard Conditions that respond to the Attorney General and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). The General Plan policies and Standard Conditions guide infill and sustainable development reliant on pedestrian connections, re-use and rehabilitation of existing structures, link transportation opportunities, promote development that is sensitive to natural resources and incentivizes denser mixed use projects that maximizes diverse opportunities. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of GHGs and determined that GHG emissions would be cumulatively considerable, which would be a significant unavoidable adverse cumulative impact. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project would not hinder the State's GHG reduction goals established by Assembly (AB) 32 and therefore would be less than a significant impact. 8. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) environment through the routine transport, use, or • disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? ' C) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 114 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? • Rev. 9/2011 B, C, & D— 86 Initial Study for DRC2011-00641 & SUBTT18817 City of Rancho Cucamonga HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC Page 24 Less Tnan • signd¢anl Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources DI Mingabcn wrpwaletl Im act Im en h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: a) Development within the City may utilize or generate hazardous materials or wastes. This is usually associated with individual households, small business operations, and maintenance activities like paints, cleaning solvents, fertilizers, and motor oil or through construction activities that would use paints, solvents, acids, curing compounds, grease, and oils. These materials would be stored and used at individual sites. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Compliance with Federal. State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. No adverse impacts are expected. b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full • service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. No adverse impacts are anticipated. C) There are schools located within 1/4 mile of the project site. The project site is located within .17 mile of Los Amigos Elementary School. Typically, single-family residential development does not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The project site is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. Recent site inspections did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan according to the General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1 and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 2 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) There are no private airstrips within the City. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 '/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. g) The City has a developed roadway network that provides emergency access and evacuation routes to existing development. New development will be located on a site • that has access to existing roadways. The City's Emergency Operation Plan, which is updated every three years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the event of a disaster. Because the project includes at Rev. 9/2011 B, C, & D - 87 Initial Study for DRC2011-00641 & SUBTT18817 City of Rancho Cucamonga HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC Page 25 • Less T an Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources. Pmenaa, With Than SIgn18cant Mitigation S,gn'i No Impact Inco oraled Im aU Impact least two points of public street access it is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from wind-driven fires in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone found in the northern part of the City; however, the proposed project site is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone according to General Plan Figure PS-1, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? • c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) that would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? O O O (✓) • Rev. 9/2011 B, C, & D — 88 Initial Study for DRC2011-00641 & SUBTT18817 City of Rancho Cucamonga HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC Page 26 Las.Than • S,gn,hcanl Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Fp"'auy w,ln Than S,gmf,canl M,I,gaWh Sign,hcanl Np T' Incorpolalatl mppcl Im ad Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit. The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB), through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading. • Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. • • Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. • Perform inspections of all BMPs. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare an SWPPP. To comply with the NPDES, the project's construction contractor will be required to prepare an SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by MDS on June 16, 2011, which identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non- structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures are required to control additional storm water effluent. Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the • Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that Rev. 9/2011 B, C, & D - 89 Initial Study for DRC2D11-00641 & SUBTT18817 City of Rancho Cucamonga HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC Page 27 • Less Tnan S,Mi nt Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources. Nowmally wnn Tnan SlgmLCanl Mnlgawo S,gn,fi.N No Imoacl Inw.W.d Imoacl ImoaC shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. • Post-Construction Operational 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by MDS on June 16, 2011 to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD, approximately 35 percent of the City's water is currently provided from water supplies coming from the underlying Chino and Cucamonga Groundwater Basins. CVWD complies with its prescriptive water rights as managed by the Chino Basin Watermaster and will not deplete the local groundwater resource. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Figure RC-3. Development of the site will require the grading and excavation, but would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 300 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.9), continued development citywide will Increase water needs but will not be a significant impact CVWD has plans to meet this increased need to the year 2030 No impacts are anticipated • C) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on the site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. Rev. 912011 B, C, & D - 90 Initial Study for DRC2011-00641 & SUBTT18817 City of Rancho Cucamonga HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC Page 28 Lass than • Sign&ant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: P.I.M.11Y wim F Than S,gn,f,.nt MiLgabon SiBnificanl N^ Impact Inmmmatetl Imoad Imgep All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, • increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site is for new development and therefore is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 2) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General • Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. Rev. 9/2011 B, C, & D - 91 Initial Study for DRC2011-00641 & SUBTT18817 City of Rancho Cucamonga HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC Page 29 X099 Tnan $IBnlflLanl [Synd,.m X999 Issues and Supporting Information Sources P°'°"Many w"" han Slgmbwnt M9lpalmn Np mpact ImpaG h) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5 No adverse impacts are expected. i) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to adequately convey floodwaters from a 100-year storm event The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Figure PS-6. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. j) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: • a) Physically divide an established community? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or O O O (✓) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? C) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) or natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The site is located on the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue and is characterized by single-family and multi-family development to the north, south, east and west. This project will be of similar design and size to surrounding residential development and will become a part of the larger community. No adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site land use designation is Medium Residential The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection, SCAG's Compass Blueprint, or SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan. As such, no impacts are anticipated. C) The project site Is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to General Plan Figure RC-4 and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, • development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. Rev. 9/2011 B, C, & D - 92 Initial Study for DRC2011-00641 & SUBTT18817 City of Rancho Cucamonga HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC Page 30 Less Than • Sipndmant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Patenaatly wan Than SiBruLcenl Mmpatlon S,gml6wnt No Impact Inconp hhetl Impaq Impact 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1; therefore, there is no impact. b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site; therefore, there is no impact. 12. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of • other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? C) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comments: a) The project site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Figure PS-9 at build-out. A Noise Study was prepared (Chambers Group, June 2011) that determined that existing noise levels exceed City standards due to traffic along Arrow Route and Baker Avenue. The report recommended that a minimum 5-foot wall be constructed along Arrow Route and a 3-foot wall be constructed along Baker • Avenue. The applicant proposes to construct 6-foot high walls along both street frontages. The report also recommends providing an at least 23-dBA noise reduction to assure interior noise levels of 45-DBA CNEL in the second story bedrooms. The Mitigation Rev. 9/2011 B, C, & D — 93 Initial Study for DRC2011-00641 & SUBTT18817 City of Rancho Cucamonga HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC Page 31 • Less Than S,gmgwnt Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Sigm6cant MiagaOOn SignRic nt No Im ect IncamarateC Impad I. measures listed below would reduce exterior and interior noise levels to less-than- significant levels: 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 2) A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 40/45dBA (nighttime/daytime), and exterior noise level attenuation to below 60165dBA (nighttime/daytime), the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verity the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. 3) The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards. Certification shall be submitted to the Building • & Safety Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes. b) The normal operating uses associated with this type of project normally do not induce ground borne vibrations. As such, no impacts are anticipated. C) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic; hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project. d) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.12) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then • construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. Rev. 9/2011 B, C, & D — 94 Initial Study for DRC2011-00641 & SUBTT18817 City of Rancho Cucamonga HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC Page 32 Lass Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Wth Tnan Significant Mitigation Sigmhcant No Impact Incorporatetl Imoacl Imoacl 3) Construct a minimum 6-foot high wall along Arrow Route and 3-foot high wall along Baker Avenue prior to occupancy of the first unit. 4) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase of the project. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment but do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measures shall then be required 5) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an Airport Land Use Plan and is not within 2 miles of a public • airport. Located approximately 2 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) The project is located in a predominantly developed area and will include the construction of 94 detached multiple family homes. Although the project will increase the population growth in the area there will be a less than significant impact as the project Is consistent with the underlying Zoning and General Plan Designation which were analyzed as part of the build out in the General Plan FPEIR. Construction activities at the site will be short- term and will not attract new employees to the area. No impacts are anticipated. b) The project site is vacant and there will be no displacement of housing or people. • Therefore no adverse impact is expected Rev 9/2011 B, C, & D - 95 Initial Study for DRC2011-00641 & SUBTT18817 City of Rancho Cucamonga HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC Page 33 • Less Than Significant M Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wth Signrtmam Mnigaopn Impacl lecor 1-- c) Because the property is vacant there will be no displacement of housing or people Therefore no adverse impact is expected. 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? b) Police protection? C) Schools? d) Parks? e) Other public facilities? Comments: • a) The site, located on the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue, will be served by a fire station located approximately 1.5 miles from the project site The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project to lessen the future demand and impacts to fire services. No impacts are anticipated. b) The increase in residential units may lead to an increase in calls for service. Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled C) The Central School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve the project area. Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the School Impact Fees. With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Districts are not considered significant. No impacts are anticipated. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is located 1/2 mile from the project site The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities The site is in a developed area, • currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. Rev. 9/2011 By C, & D — 96 ti Initial Study for DRC2011-00641 & SUBTT18817 City of Rancho Cucamonga HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC Page 34 Less Than • Slghtficant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Min Than Slgnd¢ant Mitigation Significant No Impel Incooerawd tmoaet Impett According to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4 14), there will be a projected increase in library space demand but with the implementation of standard conditions the increase in Library Services would be mitigated to less than significant impact. Additionally, the Paul A. Biane Library has an additional 14,000 square foot shell of vacant library space that is planned for future Library use. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Therefore no adverse impact is expected. 15. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The • nearest park is located 1/2 miles from the project site. This project is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities beyond which that has been planned for. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. b) See a) response above. 16. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) program, including, but not limited to a level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? C) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) • either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that result in substantial safety risks? Rev. 9/2011 B, C, & D — 97 Initial Study for DRC2011-00641 & SUBTT18817 City of Rancho Cucamonga HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC Page 35 • Lass Than Slgrvbcanl Less . Issues and Supporting Information Sources. Potentially wIm Than &'tat'.nt Mmgaupn Slgrnhcant No Impaq IncofporataC Impact Impact d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓j (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓j f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs O O O (✓) regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. Comments: a) Implementation of the proposed project will generate 1,222 vehicle trips daily. The proposed project includes the development of 94 detached dwelling units. The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each single-family dwelling unit will generate 13 trips daily. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.16), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in project design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the • street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition, .the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. No impacts are anticipated. b) The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each single-family dwelling unit will generate 1 two-way peak hour trips daily. In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permit. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. No impacts are anticipated. C) Located approximately 2.5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns No impacts are anticipated J) The project is in an area that is mostly developed. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming • uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature No impacts are anticipated. Rev. 9/2011 B, C, & D - 98 Initial Study for DRC2011-00641 & SUBTT18817 City of Rancho Cucamonga HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC Page 36 ass Than • StgM,.M Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Pptenually whh Than SigntLrant Mitlgaw Sigmf¢ent No Im ed Inwt olatetl Im eCt Impact e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles during construction and upon completion of the project and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access No impacts are anticipated. f) The project does not conflict with any adopted alternative transportation plan. The project is located within 1/2 mile from the nearest connection point to the Pacific Electric Walking and Bicycle Trail, which will facilitate alternative transportation uses and trip reduction. No adverse impacts are anticipated 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project. a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ( ) ( ) To applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? C) Require or result in the construction of new storm ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? • d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) provider, which serves or may serve the project, that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-1 and RP-4 treatment plants. The RP-1 capacity is sufficient to exceed the additional development within the western and southern areas of the City. The RP-4 treatment plant has a potential ultimate capacity of 28mgd which is considered more than adequate to capacity to treat all increases in wastewater generation for build-out of the General Plan. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by • the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. The Rev 9/2011 B, C, 8h D — 99 Initial Study for DRC2011-00641 & SUBTT18817 City of Rancho Cucamonga HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC Page 37 L• Less Than Significant LB55 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ftentally w1h nan Significant Mmpahon SiBmLCen1 No Impact Incorporatatl Imoecl Imoad project Is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. C) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project is served by the CVWD water system There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity. No impacts are anticipated. f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. No impacts are anticipated • g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? C) Does the project have environmental effects that will ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? • Comments: a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Figure RC-4. Additionally, the area surrounding the Rev. 912011 B, C, & D - 100 Initial Study for DRC2011-00641 & SUBTT18817 City of Rancho Cucamonga HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC Page 38 Less Tian • Slgmhwnl Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: aplem.11, wlm ran S,gmfi.N MRlgaupn SBm4canl No IMP= InwrpomleE Impact Impatt site is developed Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site No impacts are anticipated. b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2010 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forest Resources, Air Quality, Climate Change and Mineral Resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. C) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant • impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels. Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels and the potential to disturb biological resources. Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier PEIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (T) General Plan FPEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified May 19, 2010) (T) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (T) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (T) Noise Impact Analysis—Chambers Group (June 2011) • Rev. 9/2011 B, C, & D - 101 Initial Study for DRC2011-00641 & SUBTT18817 City of Rancho Cucamonga HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC Page 39 • (T) Air Quality Analysis Report— Chambers Group (June 2011) (T) Greenhouse Gas/Climate Change Report—Chambers Group (June 2011) (T) Biological Reconnaissance Survey —Chambers Group (November 2011) (T) Arborist Report— Ryan Wagner(April 2011) • • Rev 9/2011 B, C, SD - 102 Initial Study for DRC2011-00641 & SUBMBB1; City of Rancho Cucamonga' • HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC Page 40 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Inlbal Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and'or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental affects would occur, Applicant's Signature: Date, YTZZ,2 Print Name and Tide: • • Rev. St2011 B, C, & D — 103 • City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: DRC2011-00641 and SUBTT18817 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements. 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. • 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management- The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action,what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 B, C, BD - 104 Mitigation Monitoring Program DRC2011-00641 and SUBTT18817 Page 2 • 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring afterwritten notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached • hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. in those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. B, C, & D - 105 () N N N N N J J C O �a ' F � � U D m m C 3 a a n 3 `0 0 0 U _ Z a ; N N N > > > m a) al y �Y` J fsz.' W o g� U U U m U t-- v WTI Z 4= n L O O r sY a 00 j3�:� m F co o m Z d d a m O ~ a — � U N m `T a Tr n M ° C m C C � L.. N -O O C m U U OC — m 0 cu Z N c m ° ° m o ° ° E O ` ° ° c -° d o _ 0 .., � o' a... oa dN axi 1° c Q � _ n m U a2i a°i d at o > Q - pia �' Q a aZ a' 2 N 3 'RT Ao `; 3aI m rnmm � d m a� m 3c -' � – aN m � a oa a mU aid W E Qo F p U `£ - m ° a ° c m o m or N oL EU C E r _ r ' � O T ` L O C E °— m L J C CD cu 0 0 N i 'r: rn m ) e 'a CL m °6 gy m Q ai ai U O C —_ L U1 C ... y E = T C m a) N OL ° aci '�oCU ° E ° t" occl°n .n m � wmn ° 5 E o. d � o Eao c -o D—C) 0 cma '� ° mwa) a � �`°om C Q.— a) o_ U o ° U — o c min ° m n m c Z d = a cL a o ° w a a m � '- c c E � mv . . c F � y a = o � 'o m _. 3 2 3 y oo mm N r ° Na3 � Na @noo � d ono • U U C U C a) N ] E c m m U L Q m 0 mcc � c m co o °' ma) a) m (D cm � c y �. o '@ .N 2 '� m 2 0. E c E m rn.E 'm E N o Q.E v m R d, rn rn c c m o .c- m a m rn m e a ,n -o o a 0 > c � a .� a) c m m � d C Q – a E ° m m o moo > > o m m m – � .� m – o U i QomoE � o a` aammm .SU Ewa Qo_aL Qoc Qae .c B, C, & D - 106 ' a a C) a Q Q Q a Q a C C C C C C @ @ @ @ @ @ a oa o. n a o c c o o o n._ o O O O O O U U U U U O N y C u y y a) a) a) a) a) a) J p O J O J O J O N U U U U U U U U U U U N m m m m m m m m m m m O O C c N U O) O L N a) a) 'o O C "O c 0 C p E C a) I6 V) n = >, U V c 0 O (6 t� ❑ p U Oi 2 0 o f o u o m 3a a ° C) d o y N @a E0 E2,— E L0 ¢ Up' Q0O L co m m CU a) L @ U U a) ... a) w N O NL.. °) @ O c 3 @ ? J N N w N J n a) N @ m L C C .E y .S] 'UI >. ^o m U L N L of 'D N > ° U N@ O C () J y d M @ - 3 cu c o .E ° a) � 'c '- x c @ ° m J w E E -0 3 '0 ode > - � ? a) m a 'o ° a c � a) o > m ` a) o m o m E > @ @ c X E 'O O a) M .--0 ON � C T X 0 0 � Q o L [1 0 3 > O O O N C J C fa °l O" @ d C a) N J U -p N N J V 6 "O U U a) � c N N n � � p � ❑ �� > p � a > m a Q o °) o o n n a �-U N ' v J@ m oo a) d J � N ono � > " _ �.� d a) a @w M � 0 0) C � @ U! @ = o U Q E 0 a) C Q .N @ C O C a) m o N 3 .'n. h@ x do vi .n a) J d U a _ '� 0 3 c )n U p yj a > o d J c m @ � o c w U L a) d -0 O` @ x a 0 a) O) N ._ >. c @ N �. 'E ° @ — @ d = L L @ c d ° m m ° mmo c 'c ` `� �a @3 ° o ❑ @YE � 0)v � wmEaE °- mrn o o ° � °) va 0 0. 0) m ` co_� E a) Nc @MCU o U � • CU E N J m O N a) o O C a) O J c -- a) w 0 N -- L .N d U N � m f>6 L N U °O"O N 0 .� a) .L.. 0E c 0� Q C = � = m l9 ry mmL � N > L x U c 3 >, o J ._ U @@ .J a - c o a O_ U m o m �. d d@ fn m 3 @ o aJa YF- U In 3U) � L N 0 .3 U E >d w U U c L 'p N0 O L > N L • F- 0 °) @ UK@ Hm B, C, BD - 107 N N N N N N N N N N N L) a a a a a a U C m m m N N m N m m m �3 � a oa a a a a a a .f.. o_ n . o `0 0 `o o `o o `o o `o 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 s 3 a) m N 5 5 a) (D AD a) N - - N a �.M yt¢j N_ • ° ° ��� O U U U U U U U U U U U m U Aye O U U U U U O U U ° m m m m m m m m m o 0 a a) a) m u, a 3 ua s ° ° w DC7 `0 `0 o E � N 0 0 j E mm ca a� °io am cQ ao a Ea> T0cc o L cu > o U u, a rn - o - t T -0 0 0 c o '° m a O LmZw d— 0 m � > '0U '0c U � Eo � 0 a)s; w Ol 3 'O > 0. 'ro a, d mZ o a=> cv O O co O p ,'tom W,l N Ol N ) rnu °' " -0 E_ o � o TE a) Q) mC7 m °� o m ° 0 a� s .Q a) m a- 0 m 0 �' o Q .� 0 :J n of 6 0aL o a ° c aE0 a = w � aa) D co U C C C > C O (a O N O 00 = :C ` `° - a) m m m `o v o . UU m o� °' m 3 U mmo M m si : 3 0 c c E N .N y m T lu E �' 2 w c v OC a; (.j o o c 0 m o oma a E - yo m0 `0 - 0 = t u m c = 0La) cm oni o oo.E a > d> > E - E o D " 3 0 �i c .E � of m � Em 0 u, � n.J = o c0 m Wom .m, o a) 0 o'U " 0 N y a) Z Y m 3 L.. .U. OU �` U) -O C -- V C -O C -0 O • w N a .� `m a 'a 3 3 .= O O W C m N N O T J -0 a) "a) > N m m o o O � � a� - 0 oam a) o� °- v c .o c m > o-K aa ` aci o U ` 3 a1 m 0 L > > U m a, 0) (a 'OO d -O p Ul -°O -O d U` w 76 mc3 a � -o � r a � o°, a) `m 5; = u m = ,R awwiE a) �' m �-o � ''o< ° o = 0a a0 ° c oo E ° m moo ° m � - ma - a - LNm � °ov '0• a.4 F- UV as am cns o n 2g Qrm Q � Q003a 3 'o 'm Qa B, C, & D — 108 • -icr M M M M M ^LYs 3 r 0 c `A i s d d O. d 3 3 3 3 a) 0 O U U U u O O O O w= m m m m 3= O o o O a a a a a A,t 0 O O O L a m c 0 ` 'm c Y u Q u c c c £ _ of= - @ n ;r u � N ° c0i3 '�' oco raNi 0 tnw � a) co ccm °o.UE 'rvz"E"E J > O n C M -0 O iA O m S U N N @ = m N C1 C O ' o w o o � c c E m 3 'm @ .3 U .o c E m c � � n 5 �`y N 'O N o J N J O C N > a, ? N a) a) O N N E C N a) V c 0 U@ L Q. 0I @ L C O . '3 0 M 0 CD u � a 'mm � m w v N a .� 3 o c a>> 3 n. o � •r lD CA N N J O . U 'N 'U U @ N E m t; UcE @yU c 'gc@io. ac° cpmoa> c�i E � ocaci sa..., 0)o 0 0 O n y O '� N N O N a) > !. @ N 0@ U ir.s o ELL oN - Uo o@wn o0z0m gyp, O O)jq N — c > U C i' N 0I @ > @ 0 m Y N @ m — O1 C J c N — N p CA U - CT.0.. N - N 'G O d- E co uy r� J a) O >' O N c N L U CA @ C m n E . > OI a - J J Nc mo 0 `pUnN worm a Jo a`> m � ai — s .0- 0 — Na g 0 @ U E E Q > @ `O a UL m@ d '0 0 `0 c m c . 'off o o@ a) 0 CU °� nm N � m J To L > c c tm L o) o m m `y Nm mY L E ° o o l o c o o E 0" o @ ma c mw a0 m cm - oo a) .6, ¢ @ nn EEE05 UN � @ N ° a0o � @ CD @a�w 'cov0 ° m @Eomcm > M a)O C .> () @ W a@ a N a) .0 W r E a 'O a@ O Q @ N L N L) B, C, & D - 109 e +p} r C t 0 o O O O O O N N N N N l OI C N ❑) J O O U • U � da m m m ❑ ❑ 'vzq U Lo o- �Ynp yw?=� .N� IL a m M a m m r o ° 'n -mo o .n t c .L w a'0i t r o 0 o m •-.ten m m c E J ° n_ E 0 — o u m o y c m m 3U ^ .t ❑ o O _ c `oOa � aO � u° Emn� com > 0Wo 'o �w ° �° a moo o2oL_ m m m U m � -om oEE Om . c °'mE cu 'Fu T E o a m a mm � mY c -o ,�'.r CD L) c 3 a.5° - m ' C M - m m a, .0 °-� m o > v f0 f6 `5r @ cUi� '0 °1 J ° L 3 w 'o .� ° > c m ? E y E o o m U N E :Sx..; 3 c v a a ocaFmrnn o` Eo o mNO Eo m � m Tocy 0 0 S c . o E S . c m ai ° CO L � 'w m o umo �� mmEE oar = � LE � E mm mm 3a° E � N J `p "O m U1 C fO C lU CU• rnm�m T c �V�!, '.a=m JoO oo-Y y`y .0. aJ N i ;p ° - o o L L °'J� d 2 rnv � ' F c C. 0 0 L J .gitioCp3.. N LN .D' N .2 0 O ° o CL d�>.0�o a M o❑�.L 0 3 O d N U J 0 O C y O O O m m O C Z W m OE � C aoo E 0 a)O W m ° c o U> d t � mm CL m �� c l O � a) m E -0 m � o m 0 M E �3 Z cu (v @� m ° p ° m o� � umE o oa � N ~ m o – o ° 2 oo 3 °' E a a m ai m E m � O EmNm mE mn am o � 0) CL E m Eo. E m m (D .= c m e E m T 2— Q vo 9 E o m LE L) Q o c N C m U m U n J O O c 0 O u 0 S m -0 m oaw U "o mU 0 02 Nc°00 -N L UnwwEm (?: HO w C m c m,N m n�) B, C, & D - 110 «.4 sf • fy 3 Q Q Q it Q Q Q Q Q Q C C C c-k:' C C C C C C O O O ` '�-�' O O O O O ;ate _ _ 0 0 J O ❑ U ❑ U ❑ U n•�:r ❑ U ❑ U ❑ U OU ❑ U ❑ U k $ N •O U U U U U U U U U Al )�w �k m Q1 y4 O O C "C CO 7� C U m O m C LN r C 0) L m tt 01 N ❑ J p ttct_<. N _ ? (6 Y J (0 - m N p O C i 'r� N 3 d L) 0 0 L N 0 C E W1� O " N Q C m (D 'O N o Q V O i m U j _ N O N E N O 0) ,C N U a' oE .° U N E 's co ° ocEm E am E m p Cp.. -�O > 0 0. 0 M C ... Y Y C O yy. z N r - N N ` O Cr O L O O L C -• ,4. - .0 N O N C E p 0 T N � C N 0 � Em > - °�' „,<,r; mErn -o - O- =� ocpi ' N acia� m u' ci vN 'c v o m ° c t r vN M '� o E o o > c L t m E 0 0. p � >�G.i ,L.• N � �° � N 'E m E J d p_ N 'C o .Ln d C N 10_5 >` p N -0 0 3 E c CO O a) w E C ... m LdU a ° �'N„ ddM Ol 10 OL 00 -u . U - N 'O d N J 0) d Ea) m N E N N m .S o : E o m v 3 'c o oa m 'mw ° c o gym ° cn ° -0 a) ' ° E cu ° c c '� 30 p m w .� Z• O N .E D .� .N ,@.. N a` O 3:: d C N >. N .N d - d b o °- mN > m .o = mE ,� J ❑ ° NUJEN ° .° ° � (D CU cl oL ° o ' m', E o g v o ` a m e a) - ? o � m m m • p_ N E g ° .N N N �` w y _T w c ° ° 'O r aD m d c O) O m ` m N y U L) .LS .O U O) @ N CO 0) O) m m U N N N ` O Co 0) E C>J (O (D d L E U E E O p_ O L > N LLNN ~ U (DN U m` � =V`. t- 3 °0_ waci o_� E !- E Q °� Uma m B, C, & D - 111 N N U U 0 0 U U C C C C 0 O D p ❑ U DU CN • O Q Q m m N ccm0 0 � --0— � j U o �° r w v a ? C N ll.l O, C O d � 0 ur E E @ o V/ E O ° O mEmm aE a s a @ E o O E 'O N U O, Nc C O F O @ 0a) Q x O O j 0 'O U@ C ° rb W @ W Oo N @ C C p ° m N C Y C U - • p) 0 'O a) N W Co ,@ D_ p, ° L O O O) N C CO .m 0 � d N C O O, ul O Lu p C@ C V C U E U d C @ a) N N V, C O O U m2 E � F ° B, C, & D - 112 = e � nrw 0- ( ) ƒ of � \ 00 _ < a c � � � . . E g 2 e! * \t_tm /E $\*/2f)k /{§ (z \/ § _ { q± ! ) � 9 ] - f \\ & 2 §! 2E � ) / $ = = - ` _ ` \ \ m k 0 0 - ) \i k § } ) \ ) { o \� ƒ » 2) ) / � k \ 0 � M .2 E/ ( { \ f) & ± : , ± @ - , a ® ; \ \7f \a { § ; ) \ /x > m ® } } � \ § _ , _ ` = a! =- ! £ \ ) £ § § ; / y §t { - _{ \ \ \ ® 7 = § (j 22 / swq = - « ° ± _ - - 7 / / 2 - ® � t ) k : } ) 7 ) \ ! \ k - : z ` \} }$ ! ) / � _ : - { /2 ] ) \4 ± ; x & ! \ k - - _ � \ � / k \ CL — ƒ } / a) } { \ ƒ { ( / B, c, & D - 113 Q N N N N N a a a a a C C C O O a a O. 0 0 0 0 0 a3i a3i a3i a3i N • ❑ ❑ ❑ w U U U U U 0 m m m m m rn m m m m m a° ° 0 M) o ) E m e a 'D 0 E U) c 0 0 0 — o @ m a) ooaa m � � — v = � > Y d � � of .o ❑ .0X N � NOO � U n 0 -O m O E n M U O U n O n L a) O C L N E O W N > [L N a) a) 00oa) a) xc °000 03 a' E moc N @o = o $ `o awo c c « « O O ryL p_� u vo o n o 'N m p � Z - !.- a) � aw000 NmmLNa Ewu� � E � � chair@ nay °-y00a @ " mO = � Uo `, 0m 0o c @E « @ @m 0@ NNCd3 d « nNOa) p� a� @ NINn O no o E E c n'N m o `o m E @ o c E @@ c « � 0 � rnE a n ac E o m o �uc ° m n o p ° N « a o ° o ' C O u « — w cm0 @EU) c (D(D o aE ac Sao `o aa) aci0 aa) cNai '° � c � o m La� Eoc oE �' � @f° E Eu, E � Y V) EEa� T m 'E -OCa@iEm ca° L m e aim @ m a�i @ °: E °- 0E @ `? E '`- Ooio � �. a� E @ -oc NE � c � oi '� a a c y o v c m . o -o @ N m N • U'c C f0 '�N O C N @ N O N @ C 'E O E O 'm> @ O m OC @ t O C @ E y a) > N 'O C @> a) 0 @ O f0 () UC a) O 00- a 0 ON L m M O _ n L O N O a « O O n U NO @ = - O N O O a0 n'> @ � @Eo o0 mo @ LU (D c m� = ,c � c y @ -O � c c U � E N O � o E � 'N `O « O N N N O s N N c C -F E@ (D C E Q « a'�n @ Ern @Q .E .w 0 3 ❑ mo =o �' ❑ O m a F- « o aci a � � � -0 a) a) B, C, & D - 114 x4*. • t L) a a m m a a a ?`; m > > s > a� R_a w O L) 0 00 .t;,m as O m m d e;x?'Ps m m m m E a) L -O O N T FD �C C W xt: ur ° EE -JOE 3m � � E � c >m � o>U � - .? g ... ... o .- c (a .x N ..N. 00 O a) > to (0 � '`�' O a "JO u o m $ E ac .? c E oaC7 dL u 'b" n 0 m � om � , - oa a0 cm � C) -ad oEm ° m d ooh mZ .0Wm aid mm m N C O r y N C N ..L.. m yl .... z -01 ° d m ° E w > V > c z z E mw E m i@ m m E ui-F, � magi � a Nd p n� m ° v � � nod aci o o m m C m _ m m Z C U C Td W — N ;�.; m C m 'o m J `o m >: a m a) o 0 �_ Ep3EH � do mZ a) � Oa v � n ° o3 � J m c Ta 2 2 pN m m o m o 0 0 c O � m u c Um >,acd� w n m c w a� p oo � ° m E o Em O m . E E o _ o ° m= w o O UJ m _ E m m W w m c U a c c 1" 0 a) (D C O J O 4- O N jN N . t C 0 ,. . t .2 m J > E - a' o m J-E j U O n O o � _ c C =. p _a) V0 0 Ej a L U m 3 :ay a � o c °... o B, C, & D - 115 Q °a °a Q Q r 0 O p a Q O o 0 0 - - U U T) ED C C O 0 O N • O m m U U `— O O o (L m m O Q) Q C CA'" C - C C a) a) N a) N OI j m C ?. N () = V' a) a) 'D N U > m O C .O .O .` a) L O N .O d L L.. C a3 w O C Y "O L a) N > Z, > a) u! V a) N "O C l9 'O N .-. O al a) C 'D 'O 'O U _ a) O T y O O O U O `p N y V C Y N EO O ` C 'C (n O V O a) a) 3 U N t C@ '=O C O O 4? 0 E p c oc N O m as N ? C L p E m a) N a) `) > d a vi m r a t o `- 0 0 � a m@ vi c a, a) n E E aa)) m 3 m a) o d p 3 m O O N O@ O N -o N a) N O O ° O 'C O.E c .� 'O N a a ° m �c a U c ° m Y c c U a n > y ° = a) E U L L Ng � � � .E W p =_ E -o (D b aa) o s cL pis pO x E a y 3 o u a) p a N o o@ � � 3 a) a�i E f `6 3: :E O Y C w E ` .c o Oi E pO °� .� o ° a `9OCa > omm � co m aO Eper mo ° d o � � vm m rnm > Na- � .a mCU(D W _ � oam E a � ° � o - an a) >) � caoE ? m °' ma � E m C a) p O).� D m E 0 a'— _ m p Ul Q O a S — Q) "' N D O 0° a o = a) .E = N m '- E a r a 0 oc w p N 'c = 0 0 oc , o aiara) mcc = '6aEi - � � aci ° � ` p)� E o).cM , M 0o)o "c0 - 2 `o U L Q N L L.. L N E C N «O -0 C .._, -O E a) C -O N V1 Q) C F— a) a m C '�` ✓) m ' N M >. N a) — .= Ol'— N a7 C > 'O U ai N y E O N L C O E@ O `p E C O y L 0 N m C y .0 O N O a) � wc ~ ° ° M a) om E m a o mca nO � > acpao c � t 11• a) 0_ O a) N N N a1 � O_ a7 al E � O a) L O OJ p N O u) al o L a) O N .� cn N w mm .E o m aE Em m� � .�� 6r a� 2 `0 2 � r aa> c � � La � a '� a t O . m 'O 'C O_ a) C a) ? CL = O > U E �Q wo c0 a aa) = op n p o � pmL m - 'C as co m ._ - U 0 m U L m U 0 - 0 c U) B, C, & D - 116 � ƒ ƒ ( D 0 : ! o ! 0 \ ) � 0 ® ® 3 ) 0 a : 0 \ 2 ! ! CL k ' ) 5 ) E mu E / [ ! ] ; < = - � ± # ! \ 99 ! I % « _ , : 5 A0 ) 3j k o \° ° ( :! . ;} / f [\ ± ; o� i(/ ! : ] - k ) »» & = of : ! � \ f\ f/ (/ / \ Noll 2 � \ \ < /} \ � { } \ ƒƒ f 2 7j § �2 = » . a \\t \ : \ \ \ \ 0 - Q)C \ 0 0 ®! ml = � z = { + 2 2 { / \ \ //\ \ ) 0 ! / 000 { \\ ® ` ® 22 \ k \ \ f - - \ [ (/ ±22/ . ) § e \ �- Z / ] § \ \ »\) ){ ) ƒ + [ {( ;/)L \ _ :\ ) } ' / { 0 0- U) ) ( L) / / ) ) ) } ) . B, C, & D - 117 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2011-00641, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18817 AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2011-00891. Public Review Period Closes: April 25, 2012 Project Name: HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC Project Applicant: HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA Project Location (also see attached map): Located at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue. Project Description: Architecture and site review of a 94-unit,small lot multi-family residential subdivision on 11.7 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-17 dwelling per acre). FINDING • This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga,acting as the lead agency,has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted,the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. • April 25, 2012 Date of Determination Adopted By B, C, & D - 118 0 s 4F ' Wmt of iff 1, d' all r w 1 t . . 4, �. '-i'1 Pit :- v �� -a� 0 ' sF•'s � :— �' �•-�-:+� �-�_ �- Wit ' RESOLUTION NO. 12-15 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00641, A REQUEST TO REVIEW THE ARCHITECTURE AND SITE PLAN OF A 94-UNIT, SMALL LOT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION ON 11.7 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLINGS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND BAKER AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0207-201-01, 21 AND 44. A. Recitals. 1. Homescape Cucamonga, LLC filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2011-00641, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 25th day of April 2012, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission • of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing April 25, 2012, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The 11.7 acre site is located at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue in the Medium (M) Residential Development District; and b. North of the site are two mobile home parks within the Low-Medium (LM) Residential Development District; to the south is a mix of single-family and multi-family residences within the Medium (M) Residential Development District; to the east are single-family and multi-family residences within the Medium (M) Residential Development District; and, to the west is a mix of single-family and multi-family residences within the Medium (M) Residential Development District; and C. The project consists of 94 detached, two-story residences made up of two housing types and four architectural styles, Spanish, Cottage, Craftsman and Tuscan; and d. There will be 86 zero lot line homes and 8 center plot homes ranging in size from 1,663 square feet to 2,000 square feet; and e. The project density will be 8.03 units per acre, which is within the 8 to 14 dwelling • units per acre permitted by the General Plan; and B, C, & D - 120 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-15 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00641 HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC APRIL 25, 2012 Page 2 • f. The recreational amenities will include two swimming pools (adult and children's), a spa, a bathroom facility and BBQ area with tables. There will also be a separate tot lot located within a large open grass area. A common seating area will be provided at the end of each paseo; and g. All of the streets and sidewalks within the project will be privately maintained by a Home Owners Association and will include on-street parking. The project will have 77 guest parking spaces, which far exceeds the minimum 24 parking spaces required by the Development Code. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and b. The proposed design or improvements are consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and C. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and d. The design of the project is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and • avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and e. The project is not likely to cause serious public health problems. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated • Negative Declaration. B, C, BD - 121 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-15 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00641 HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC APRIL 25, 2012 Page 3 C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project; d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director,of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for site plan and architectural review for 94 detached • multi-family residences on 11.7 gross acres of land, located at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue - APN: 0207- 201-01, 21 and 44. 2) The applicant shall make a good faith effort to replace the existing property line walls with minimum 6-foot high decorative walls for the single-family residences at 8401 and 8415 Baker Avenue (walls facing project). 3) The applicant shall make a good faith effort to remove the walls and drainage facility located on the property of the residences at 8714 and 8715 Grand Oaks Court. 4) Final design of the seating areas at the end of the paseos will be approved by the Planning Director at time of Plan Check. 5) The homes with private courtyards shall be limited to a maximum of 50 percent hardscape and shall be fully landscaped within 6 months of occupation. The CCBRs shall include language regulating the maximum hardscape coverage, maintenance of the courtyards and what may be stored in the courtyards. 6) All lighting fixtures used on the side and rear elevations shall match the lighting fixtures used on the front elevations. • 7) All exterior doors shall have a raised panel design. B, C, & D — 122 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-15 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00641 HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC APRIL 25, 2012 Page 4 • 8) All walls exposed to public view shall be decorative and include decorative pilasters. 9) Side yard gates shall have a minimum 90 percent view obscuring metal privacy screen. Engineering Department 1) Arrow Route frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Major Arterial" standards, as required and including: a. Dedication shall be made a total of 50 feet, measured from street centerline of Arrow Route. b. Protect curb and gutter or repair, as required. c. Remove sidewalk and construct meandering sidewalk and install street trees, as required. d. Drive approach to Arrow Route shall be per City Std. 101, Type C with a minimum width of 35 feet and maximum width of 50 • feet. e. Protect existing traffic signal equipment in Arrow Route and Baker Avenue, as required. f. Protect existing traffic signing and striping along Arrow Route, or repair as required. g. Protect existing R26(s) signs, or replace as required. h. Protect or relocate existing 9500 Lumens HPSV street light, as required. 2) Baker Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Collector' standards, as required and including: a. Dedication shall be made a total of 33 feet, measured from street centerline of Baker Avenue. b. Provide curb, gutter, sidewalk and street trees, as required. c. Drive approach to Baker Avenue shall be per City Std. 101, Type C with a minimum width of 35 feet and maximum width of 50 feet. • d. Provide two (2) 5800 Lumens HPSV street lights. B, C, & D - 123 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-15 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00641 HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA. LLC APRIL 25, 2012 • Page 5 e. Protect existing traffic signing and striping along Baker Avenue, or repair as required. f. Protect existing R26(s) signs, or replace as required. 3) Revise existing City plans for the removal and reconstruction of the existing catch basin on Baker Avenue. Drive approaches shall be clear of local depressions. 4) Connect the private drainage system to the public storm drain in Arrow Route. Manhole structures (to City standards) shall be provided at the junctions. Revise existing City plans. 5) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Baker Avenue shall be undergrounded along the entire project frontage, extending to the first poles offsite of the project boundaries, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it • occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. City shall provide a portion of collected monies from the developer to the west, Tract 16908, paid for as an in-lieu fee for future undergrounding of said overhead utilities. 6) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Arrow Route shall be undergrounded along the entire project frontage, including service to north power pole along the east property line, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. 7) Access easements shall be provided ensuring ingress and egress for the benefit of existing mobile home park to the north (APN: 207-201-36) by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map. Drainage easements shall also be provided. Clarify in CC& R's that said drainage cannot be blocked. Access shall be provided with all development phases. a. The widths of the emergency vehicular access in favor of the Mobile Home Park require approval from Rancho Cucamonga Fire District. • 8) Many of the water quality features and common sidewalks cross multiple lot lines. Provide easements for these purposes on the B, C, & D - 124 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-15 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00641 HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC APRIL 25, 2012 Page 6 • final map and clarify that these items will be HOA-maintained in the CC&R's. 9) Since these are zero lot line products, provide 10-foot minimum building restriction areas on each lot adjoining a zero lot line wall on the final map. A maintenance agreement shall be granted from each lot to the adjacent lot through the CC&Rs. 10) Sufficient off street parking shall be provided in accordance with City Code Section 17.12.020D. 11) Driveway accent paving shall be located outside the public right-of- way. 12) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from 1-foot behind the sidewalk to the top of the curb. 13) Public improvements plans shall be 90 percent complete prior to the issuance of grading permits. Public improvement plans shall be 100 percent complete, signed by the City Engineer, and an improvement agreement and bonds executed by the developer, • prior to building permit issuance. Environmental Mitigation 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in • SCAQMD Rule 1108, B, C, & D — 125 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, 12-15 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00641 HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC APRIL 25, 2012 • Page 7 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 10) Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. • 11) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. B, C, & D - 126 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-15 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00641 HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC APRIL 25, 2012 • Page 8 12) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. 13) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 14) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 15) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC- 01 measure. 16) All residential structures shall be required to incorporate high- efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 17) All residential structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 18) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule • 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM25 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. 19) A protocol level burrowing owl survey shall be performed prior to the approval of a rough grading permit. 20) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 • Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric B, C, & D — 127 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-15 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00641 HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC APRIL 25, 2012 Page 9 resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying a in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 21) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow • the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. 22) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 23) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • B, C, & D — 128 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-15 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00641 HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC APRIL 25, 2012 Page 10 • 24) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 25) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 26) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short- term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 27) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specification. 28) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. • 29) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. 30) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. 31) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for construction crew. 32) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic- compound (VOC) materials. 33) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: • Increased insulation; • Limit air leakage through the structure; • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space • heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances; B, C, & D — 129 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-15 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00641 HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC APRIL 25, 2012 Page 11 • Landscape and developed site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping; • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems; • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements; • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 34) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • a Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces. 35) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educated employees about reducing waste and about recycling. 36) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 37) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of • grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced B, C, BD - 130 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-15 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00641 HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC APRIL 25, 2012 Page 12 • in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 38) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 39) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 40) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by MDS on June 16, 2011 to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 41) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and • minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 42) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 43) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage • under the NPDES General Construction Permit. B, C, & D - 131 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-15 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00641 HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC APRIL 25, 2012 • Page 13 44) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 45) A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 40/45dBA (nighttime/daytime), and exterior noise level attenuation to below 60/65dBA (nighttime/daytime), the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. 46) The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards. • Certification shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes. 47) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 48) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 49) Construct a minimum 6-foot high wall along Arrow Route and 3-foot high wall along Baker Avenue prior to occupancy of the first unit. 50) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. • 51) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks B, C, & D - 132 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-15 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00641 HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC APRIL 25, 2012 • Page 14 used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF APRIL 2012. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Luis Munoz, Jr., Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner I, Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner, of the of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of April 2012. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • B, C, & D — 133 RESOLUTION N0. 12-16 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18817, A REQUEST TO CREATE A 94 LOT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP ON 11.7 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLINGS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND BAKER AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0207-201-01, 21 AND 44. A. Recitals. 1. Homescape Cucamonga, LLC filed an application for the approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18817, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 25th day of April 2012, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: • 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing April 25, 2012, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The 11.7 acre site is located at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue in the Medium (M) Residential Development District; and b. North of the site are two mobile home parks within the Low-Medium (LM) Residential Development District; to the south is a mix of single-family and multi-family residences within the Medium (M) Residential Development District; to the east are multi-family residences within the Medium (M) Residential Development District; and, to the west is a mix of single-family and multi-family residences within the Medium (M) Residential Development District; and C. The site has regularly been cleared of vegetation and generally drains from north to south. There is an existing drainage facility on two properties to the east that facilitates surface flows from one of the mobile home parks to the north and will be removed with the proposed development. One of the mobile home parks to the north has an access easement across the project site to provide vehicular access to Baker Avenue. This easement will be preserved with an automatic gate between the two developments. There are 11 trees on the site that conflict with the proposed development and will need to be removed; and d. The project includes the development of 94 detached, two-story residences on • individual lots. There will be 86 zero lot line homes and 8 center plot homes; and B, C, & D - 134 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-16 VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18817 - HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC APRIL 25, 2012 Page 2 • e. The project density will be 8.03 units per acre, which is within the 8 to 14 dwelling units per acre permitted by the General Plan; and f. All of the streets and sidewalks within the project will be privately maintained by a Home Owners Association and will include on-street parking. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and b. The proposed design or improvements are consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and C. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and d. The design of the project is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and e. The project is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written • and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQX) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public • Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. B, C, B, D - 135 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-16 VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18817 - HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC APRIL 25, 2012 Page 3 d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 'Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the subdivision of 11.7 acres into 94 detached lots along with common recreation areas, streets and sidewalks to be maintained by a Home Owners Association for a site located at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue - APN: 0207-201-01, 21 and 44. 2) A Vesting Tentative Map approval is valid for two years. The Planning Commission may approve up to three, 1-year extensions. . 3) The applicant shall make a good faith effort to replace the existing property line walls with minimum 6-foot high walls for the single-family residences at 8401 and 8415 Baker Avenue (walls facing project). 4) The applicant shall make a good faith effort to remove the walls and drainage facility located on the property of the residences at 8714 and 8715 Grand Oaks Court. 5) The project shall provide vehicle access to the mobile home park to the north as long as there is a legal easement across the site. The project shall at minimum provide and maintain an electric gate for access between the two properties. 6) All walls exposed to public view shall be decorative and include decorative pilasters. Engineering Department 1) Arrow Route frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Major Arterial" standards, as required and including: a. Dedication shall be made a total of 50 feet, measured from street centerline of Arrow Route. • b. Protect curb and gutter or repair, as required. B, C, BD - 136 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-16 VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18817 - HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC APRIL 25, 2012 Page 4 c Remove sidewalk and construct meandering sidewalk and install street trees, as required. d. Drive approach to Arrow Route shall be per City Std. 101, Type C with a minimum width of 35 feet and maximum width of 50 feet. e. Protect existing traffic signal equipment in Arrow Route and Baker Avenue, as required. f. Protect existing traffic signing and striping along Arrow Route, or repair as required. g. Protect existing R26(s) signs, or replace as required. h. Protect or relocate existing 9500 Lumens HPSV street light, as required. 2) Baker Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Collector" standards, as required and including: a. Dedication shall be made a total of 33 feet, measured from street centerline of Baker Avenue. • b. Provide curb, gutter, sidewalk and street trees, as required. c. Drive approach to Baker Avenue shall be per City Std. 101, Type C with a minimum width of 35 feet and maximum width of 50 feet. d. Provide two (2) 5800 Lumens HPSV street lights. e. Protect existing traffic signing and striping along Baker Avenue, or repair as required. f. Protect existing R26(s) signs, or replace as required. 3) Revise existing City plans for the removal and reconstruction of the existing catch basin on Baker Avenue. Drive approaches shall be clear of local depressions. 4) Connect the private drainage system to the public storm drain in Arrow Route. Manhole structures (to City standards) shall be provided at the junctions. Revise existing City plans. 5) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Baker Avenue shall be undergrounded along • the entire project frontage, extending to the first poles offsite of the project boundaries, prior to public improvement , acceptance or B, C, & D— 137 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-16 VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18817 - HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC APRIL 25, 2012 • Page 5 occupancy, whichever occurs first. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. City shall provide a portion of collected monies from the developer to the west, Tract 16908, paid for as an in-lieu fee for future undergrounding of said overhead utilities. 6) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Arrow Route shall be undergrounded along the entire project frontage, including service to the north power pole along the east property line, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. 7) Access easements shall be provided ensuring ingress and egress for the benefit of existing mobile home park to the north (APN: 207-201-36) by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map. Drainage easements shall also be provided. Clarify in CC& R's that said drainage cannot be blocked. • Access shall be provided with all development phases. a. The widths of the emergency vehicular access in favor of the Mobile Home Park requires approval from Rancho Cucamonga Fire District. 8) Many of the water quality features and common sidewalks cross multiple lot lines. Provide easements for these purposes on the final map and clarify that these items will be HOA-maintained in the CC&R's. 9) Since these are zero lot line products, provide 10-foot minimum building restriction areas on each lot adjoining a zero lot line wall on the final map. A maintenance agreement shall be granted from each lot to the adjacent lot through the CC&Rs. 10) Sufficient off street parking shall be provided in accordance with City Code Section 17.12.020D. 11) Driveway accent paving shall be located outside the public right-of- way. 12) Parkways shall slope at 2 percent from 1-foot behind the sidewalk to the top of the curb. • 13) Public improvements plans shall be 90 percent complete prior to the issuance of grading permits. Public improvement plans shall be 100 percent complete, signed by the City Engineer, and an B, C, & D - 138 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-16 VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18817 - HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC APRIL 25, 2012 Page 6 • improvement agreement and bonds executed by the developer, prior to building permit issuance. Environmental Mitigation 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall • be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the • time of year of construction. B, C, & D - 139 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-16 VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18817 - HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA. LLC APRIL 25, 2012 • Page 7 • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB)) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive .construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. • 10) Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. 11) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 12) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. 13) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 14) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 15) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC- 01 measure. 16) All residential structures shall be required to incorporate high- efficiencyllow-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 17) All residential structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. • 18) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 B, C, & D - 140 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0, 12-16 VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18817 - HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC APRIL 25, 2012 Page 8 • to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009 19) A protocol level burrowing owl survey shall be performed prior to the approval of a rough grading permit. 20) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 • Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying a in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 21) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to • the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. B, C, BD - 141 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-16 VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18817 - HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC APRIL 25, 2012 • Page 9 • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. 22) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 23) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • 24) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 25) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 26) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short- term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 27) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures specification. 28) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 29) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. • 30) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. B, C, & D - 142 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, 12-16 VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18817 - HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC APRIL 25, 2012 Page 10 • 31) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for construction crew. 32) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic- compound (VOC) materials. 33) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: • Increased insulation; • Limit air leakage through the structure; • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances; • Landscape and developed site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping; • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems; • • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements; • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 34) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces. • B, C, & D— 143 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-16 VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18817 - HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC APRIL 25, 2012 • Page 11 35) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas Educated employees about reducing waste and about recycling. 36) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 37) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be • corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 38) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 39) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 40) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by MDS on June 16, 2011 to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 41) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. • 42) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and B, C, BD - 144 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-16 VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18817 - HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC APRIL 25, 2012 Page 12 • identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 43) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. 44) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 45) A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review • and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 40145dBA (nighttime/daytime), and exterior noise level attenuation to below 60/65dBA (nighttime/daytime), the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. 46) The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards. Certification shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes. 47) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 48) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code • Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to B, C, & D— 145 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-16 VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18817 - HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC APRIL 25, 2012 • Page 13 the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 49) Construct a minimum 6-foot high wall along Arrow Route and 3-foot high wall along Baker Avenue prior to occupancy of the first unit. 50) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. 51) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. • APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF APRIL 2012. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Luis Munoz, Jr., Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner I, Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner, of the of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of April 2012. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: • ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: B, C, & D— 146 RESOLUTION NO. 12-17 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2011-00891, A REQUEST TO REMOVE 11 TREES RELATED TO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2011-00641 A 94-UNIT SMALL LOT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION ON 11.7 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLINGS PER ACRE) LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND BAKER AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0207-201-01, 21 AND 44. A. Recitals. 1. Homescape Cucamonga, LLC filed an application for the approval of Tree Removal Permit, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 25th day of April 2012, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting to consider the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW THEREFORE it is hereby ound determined,mined, and resolved by the Planning Commission • of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A. of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing April 25, 2012, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The 11.7 acre site is located at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue in the Medium (M) Residential Development District; and b. North of the site are two mobile home parks within the Low-Medium (LM) Residential Development District; to the south is a mix of single-family and multi-family residences within the Medium (M) Residential Development District; to the east are multi-family residences within the Medium (M) Residential Development District; and, to the west is a mix of single-family and multi-family residences within the Medium (M) Residential Development District, and C. The site has regularly been cleared of vegetation and generally drains from north to south. There is an existing drainage facility on the property to the east that facilitates surface flows from one of the mobile home parks to the north and will be removed with the proposed development. One of the mobile home parks to the north has an access easement across the project site to provide vehicular access to Baker Avenue. This easement will be preserved with an automatic gate between the two developments. There are 11 trees on the site that conflict with the proposed development and • will need to be removed; and d. The project includes the development of 94 detached, two-story residences on individual lots. There will be 86 zero lot line homes and 8 center plot homes; and B, C, BD - 147 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-17 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2011-00891 - HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC APRIL 25, 2012 Page 2 • e. There are approximately 11 trees on the site. The applicant has submitted an Arborist Report (Professional Design Associates — April 22, 2011) which concludes that the trees will be in conflict with the proposed development and will need to be removed The project will be required to comply with the Development Code's tree planting requirement and plant at least 149 trees on-site. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and b. The proposed design or improvements are consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and C. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and d. The design of the project is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and e. The project is not likely to cause serious public health problems. • 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation • Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with B, C, 8, D — 148 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-17 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2011-00891 - HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC APRIL 25, 2012 • Page 3 the mitigation measures during project implementation The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the removal of 11 trees related to the development of 94 multi-family units on the site (DRC2011-00641 and SUBTT18817) for a site located at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue -APN: 0207-201-01, 21 and 44. 2) Tree Removal Permit DRC2011-00891 is only valid with the approval of Development Review DRC2011-00641 and Tentative • Tract Map SUBTT18817. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF APRIL 2012. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Luis Munoz, Jr., Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner I, Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner, of the of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of April 2012. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: • ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: B, C, & D - 149 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: DRC2011-00641, SUBTT18817 and DRC2011-00891 SUBJECT: Development Review, Tentative Tract Map and Tree Removal Permit APPLICANT: Homescape Cucamonga, LLC LOCATION: Northeast corner of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue —APN: 0207-201-01, 21 and 44 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements Completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval,or in the alternative,to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers,,or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 12-15, 12-16 & 12-17, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans(full size). The sheet(s)are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Mitigated Negative Declaration - $ 2,151.50 _X_ B. Time Limits 1. This vesting tentative tract map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 2 years from the date of the approval. • B, C, & D - 150 Protect No.DRC2011-00641. SUBTT18817 and DRC2011-X89f1' ' Completion Date 2. Development/Design Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. C. Site Development • 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping,sign program,and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.)or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code,all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with I / all receptacles shielded from public view. --- 9. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 10. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 11. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. --- 12. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CCBRs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners'Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Services Department and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer, The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. • B, C, BD.- 151 Project No.DRC2011-00641 SUBTT18817. and DRC2011-00891 Completion Date 13. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners'association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape • maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 14. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures, or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects, pursuant to Development Code Section 17 08.060-G-2. 15. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 16. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter 17. Construct block walls between homes(i.e.,along interior side and rear property lines),rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 18. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. • 19. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. 20. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 21. For residential development, recreation area/facility shall be provided as required by the Development Code. 22. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured products. D. Building Design 1. All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural treatment, _/_/_ detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to Issuance of building permits. 2. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowner's Association shall be submitted for Planning Director and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 3. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent • properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects B, C, BD - 152 Project No.DRC2011-00641 SU6TT18817 and DRC2011-x0891 Completion Date vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or • ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 4 For all residential development, provide conduit from each unit/lot and a pull box to connect to the street. Provide interior structured wiring for each house/building with minimum Category 5 copper wire, Radio Grade 6 coaxial cable, and a central distribution panel, prior to release of occupancy (fiber-to-the building, FTTB) Plans shall be submitted for Planning Director and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space abuts a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide. 2. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, / ! and exits shall be striped per City standards. --- 4. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk. — — 5. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on _/—/—• this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas. 6. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the Planning Director, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn- around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way. F. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking —/—/- stalls. 3. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 4. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. • B, C, BD - 153 r , Project No.DRC2011-00641 SUBTT18817 and DRC2011-00891 Completion Date 5. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as • follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent Irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 6. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and Irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit Is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 7 Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and Irrigation shall be required per the Development / Code. ——— & The final design of the perimeter parkways,walls,landscaping, and sidewalks shall be Included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department, 9. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 10. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas,the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 11. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.These criteria shall encourage the natural growth • characteristics of the selected tree species. 12. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping as defined in Ordinance 823 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code G. Environmental 1. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate,verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. 2. The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards. Certification shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes. 3. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of$557 prior to the issuance of building permits,guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. • B, C, & D - 154 Project No.DRC2011-00641 SUBTT18817 and DRC2011-6086f1' ' Completion Date H. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; C. Floor Plan, d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e Electrical Plans(2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams,water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g. Planning Department Project Number(Le,, SUBTT#, SUBTPM#, DRC#)clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers'Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. --/ / — 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. I. Site Development • 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number(i.e., DRC2011-00641,SUBTT18817 and DRC2011-00891). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. The applicant shall provide a copy of the School Fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. J. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances / / considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. --- 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions _/_/_• B, C, & D -1 65 • r ' . Project No DRC2011-00641 SUBTT18817. and DRC2011-00891 Completion Date 4. Roofing materials shalt be Class "A." 5. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A �. Grading 1 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to / ! perform such work. --- 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. As a custom-lot subdivision, the following requirements shall be met: a Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all on-site drainage facilities necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Official prior to final map approval and prior to the issuance of grading permits. b. Appropriate easements for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducted onto or over adjacent parcels, are to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of grading and building permits. • c. On-site drainage improvements, necessary for dewatering and protecting the subdivided properties, are to be installed prior to issuance of building permits for construction upon any parcel that may be subject to drainage flows entering, leaving, or within a parcel relative to which a building permit is requested. d. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Department for approval prior to the issuance of grading and building permits(this may be on an incremental or composite basis). e. All slope banks in excess of 5 feet in vertical height shall be seeded with native grasses or planted with ground cover for erosion control upon completion of grading or some other alternative method of erosion control shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Official. In addition, a permanent irrigation system shall be provided. This requirement does not release the applicant/developer from compliance with the slope planting requirements of Section 17.08.040 of the Development Code. 6. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer 7. If human remains are discovered on-site before or during grading, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 and California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5. L. Security Lighting 1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. • These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. B, C, & D - 156 Project No DRC2011-00641 SUBTT18817 and DRC2011-LAJ831 ' Completion Date 2. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings,with direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. • 3. Lighting In exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. / ! M. Security Hardware 1. A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors 2. One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors. If windows are within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used. 3. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • • B, C, & D - 157 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District . Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS April 9, 2012 Homescape, LLC NEC Arrow & Baker SUBTT18817 & DRC2011-00641 The developer of this proposed tract must provide a fire department access driveway on the north property line to the westerly Mobile Home Park; the required access drive on the new development must line up with the existing street on the mobile home park that now leads into the vacant land. As alternative the developer may choose to construct the fire department's access for the mobile home park on the west side (Baker Ave) of the mobile home park. Reference the approved letter if intent on file from Homescape, LLC. THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply �. The private water supply and fire hydrants shall be design in accordance with RCFPD Standard 5-10 and the 2010 California Fire Code. 2. Public water supply and fire hydrants shall be design in accordance with the RCFPD Standard 5-10, the 2010 California Fire Code and the Cucamonga Valley Water District. FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The required fire flow for this project will be determined in gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch when the structure size for the development is known. This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 2. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 3. Fire review and approval of the public water plans to be submitted to CVWD for permit issuance 4. On-site fire protection water plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services. This project is required to extend the existing public water supply onto the site. 5. Building permits will not be issued until public fire protection water plans are approved and adequate water supply is provided for construction purposes. 6. On all architectural plan sets to be submitted for building plan check provide a site plan that illustrate all the proposed public and private fire hydrants located on/and within 600-feet of the project site. FSC-9 Single-family Residential Sales Model homes require approved Fire District vehicle access and water •upply from a public or private water main system before construction. B, C, BD - 158 FCS-10 Fire Sprinklers All structures must be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers in accordance with NFPA 13D and the 2010• California Fire Code. FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee. FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District #85-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS — Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Standard #10-5. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a water supply clearance before lumber is dropped on sit* (except form lumber). 2. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #14-1. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. 3. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION — Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Public Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. 3. Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street. When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. • B, C, & D - 159 0 T h e C i t y 0 f Rancho Cucamonrsa Staff Report Date: April 25, 2012 To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission From: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer Subject: TRACT MAP SUBTT18782 AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2010-00361 - LEWIS APARTMENT COMMUNITIES - A request for on-street parking on Town Center Drive west of Spruce Avenue adjacent to the Santa Barbara Multi-family housing development consisting of 192 units. APN: 1077-422-21, 22, and 25. BACKGROUND: The subject development was approved by the Planning Commission on December 8, 2010. At • the Planning Commission hearing, the staff report outlined that the quantity of on-site parking exceeds Development Code regulations, and Lewis Apartment Management has a stringent parking program to reduce parking problems. The development is currently under construction and is scheduled for completion in the Fall of 2012. Mr. John Young of Lewis Operating Corporation approached City Engineering staff to request that Lewis be allowed to restripe Town Center Drive to allow on-street parking on both the north and south side of Town Center Drive between Elm Avenue and Spruce Avenue. Mr. Young also submitted the attached email outlining the reasons for the request. EVALUATION: Engineering staff reviewed the subject development conditions of approval and City codes and determined that authorization of on-street parking would not be in conflict with either. However, because of the extensive discussion regarding parking in the development approval staff report, Engineering staff informed Planning of the request, and it was recommended that the request be presented to the Planning Commission for their comments. Engineering staff reviewed the history of on-street parking within the Terra Vista Community Plan. On December 3, 2003, the City Engineer took a similar request to the Public Works Subcommittee. The request was for on-street parking for the Jamboree Apartments along Elm Avenue east of Spruce Avenue. The request was approved within certain conditions recommended by the Traffic Engineer. Engineering staff has driven around Terra Vista and located additional cases of on-street parking along Mountain View Drive and Mayten Avenue. • ITEM E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TRACT MAP SUBTT18782 AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2010-00361 April 25, 2012 Page 2 • Town Center Drive was constructed to a secondary street width of 64 feet curb to curb. It is striped with 2 lanes of traffic in each direction and a striped median for left turn movements. Town Center Drive is the secondary access point and truck delivery route to the Terra Vista shopping center. However, the official street designation in the Terra Vista Community Plan is a collector street. All other collector streets within Terra Vista have a street width of 44 feet curb to curb with one lane of traffic in each direction and just a centerline strip. A traffic study was prepared for Town Center Drive that concluded that the volume of traffic on the street substantiates Town Center Drive being classified as a collector street. Engineering staff concurs that Town Center Drive may be restriped to have only one lane of traffic in each direction, with the current median striping to remain. RECOMMENDATION: Engineering staff recommends permitting on-street parking only on the north side of Town Center Drive along the straight portion of the street adjacent to the Santa Barbara project. Staff cannot recommend parking on both sides of Town Center Drive because of the limited approval history of on-street parking within the Terra Vista Community Plan and to avoid pedestrians making mid-block street crossings. The following language has been drafted for the Planning Commission to review and forward to the Public Works Subcommittee, if the Commission concurs with staffs recommendation. Approve on-street parking for the north side of Town Center Drive from Elm Avenue to the • beginning of the curve portion near Spruce Avenue. This will provide for approximately 600 feet of curb parking which would allow for approximately 24 vehicles to park on Town Center Drive. Respectfully Submitted, Dan James ' Senior Civil Engineer Attachments: Vicinity Map Mr. Young Email Request Site Utilization Map Town Center Drive DJ/rlf • E-2 BAST LWE ROAD BASE UNE ROAD 6 D J 0 U Zo uDSA1N c �� AYE ow dp chi TOOTtUMLL eo ARD FOOTHILL BOULKYARD VICINITY MAP E-3 J Reasons for requesting parking on Town Center Dr.: • As we began building the Santa Barbara project I saw how little used Town Center and felt that adding parking would at least add some use to a street that was over built. • Planning wanted us to provide a pedestrian connection to Town Center which we provided at great cost and without parking this entry at the mid block on Town Center is not needed. • Every project can always use extra parking. John Young VP Multi-Family Development Lewis Operating Corp. 1156 N. Mountain Avenue Upland, CA 91786 john.young @lewisop.com (909) 949-6781 Phone (909) 297-6439 Mobile (909) 912-8179 Fax www.lewisop.com • • E-4 ' / � me yo Its- xv EV opw All 14 1 xj F. ' 5 I i .E -I LO p9}�S54P nom d U lji eE�l .Fl � maw 1�lI o oa 5 0 P4 ro � I: ie o a - �;;i �, •� h3� jam sa DAa °i D4 o o CUP jr 1 ) u E-6 R h I� Mr Y 4hti � pp� ¢k gat ► ` � a�a flf (1 A f; f' t t A � �ylF( is - •r� L1.• f � ' r •j4' 1 ' " "Ii rL �j � � — P C \ \ C 3 h N J W N u - � Z Z Z N Z D � ~ Z Q O = LLM N Q O u � � u O J a L 0o Z W O �7 Q Z- > W Z V - - Z Z Q W Q J W H tA Q D Z LA , c� z � nv �a O O 4-- v Ln N M E v ' 4mJ W ZL ca O c CL a Q m m Q +, d' : 4-J N 00 (J1 N 00 =3 • W 4mi U N 4-1 Ci Vn N 0 +-' O 4-J O � • — O Q •O u 4=J Cy 4-J -0 ° o N . � -n 0. 00 r -0 E ° y n N N dJ CO > 0 1..� o a--J 9� > m C Q o , _ p O Qj � VNO Vt% O tj �_ � � o O O _ +_+ u O Ln O � i � O N O c O C: > +-+ ca '+_+ aJ u u O E O O N E N E u 070 ,070 0 C: 070 L CL m CC m _ cn CL u CL m Ln L i C: Ln ,v .� 4-J Ln ._ 4-j c > O O L O no .� i.f. E xo � " O vO � c' a- a _ m CL u u �' � _ n� � �__ �s �I � r �Y��R`.ss � " r .: �: ti �, �rf� � _ ,I I—.� ,}/�ri _ ��. � � • -�, # �� i� :tip s I tr � � -M ,�� �; � k"� ., � s "��� ,fir `- �i �� • , ��, 1 • • • �� � � � � � � ' 1 • � � � • • � � � � • .�, ' � � � � � � � � � � • • , � � � • � � � � � � � • • � � 1 � � � • • � � � � a � � '�.� ��� �t4s � tl --AV N3 s U d N - %iVbR1N ZI 11J, I l I i I IT 4-J ILI I 9RI l o Cc u6a ' . ' _ a a�_. ` L U ` + I I I I g - rl ' „ I -1 �`.J O O -O }' 4- J }' C 3 N u c: cn ra -O O •v = O E O p o u Q U E O a1 Ln � r� s •� -a O _ u ca }' � +-' 0) � •� O a� 0 L V) Zj c: > Q ss. N M d' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-16 VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18817 - HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC APRIL 25, 2012 Page 6 improvement agreement and bonds executed by the developer, prior to building permit issuance. 14) Where the property line coincides with a building wall on Plans 1 and 2, the property line shall be moved approximately six (6) feet away from the building wall to allow openings and projections on that building wall. Maintenance and Use Easements shall be provided, as necessary, to allow the adjoining lot to use this area for private open space. Environmental Mitigation 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. I�I tIII MR Y1I co co i W co W H - ! H m E W4 cn � O clfl Z; L > N ►- , cl % L fi' ,, • •� -'R 7•.�[,y.¢-Rj��{ ..,iii � h - ' V •j' �l ►� g � :mow � �� r. .r It MINIM if N _ n' ; , W � . - 31T 7 r � � �� - t �• � fi.r`;; �. � �_? x Jd Ar f �, _ � 1 1 CID) `1 V� .o o ;;� w� to ON Lai ON UP --� ,� p �� W� 1 n ,� •N� ] �, _ , 1) p ;� ii U� co co <<� 1 U. o� O cui � J1 OD p o0 .j Nl J75 o � dDl . p NO 1 � v Ckol Nl CNO L, O ;) �� CI L1L1 LL U D lim Q I" cu wc q ■ I� d`� ['>'! clf ri il� I�CIa�. CL /� : [ I •W�����i. .��6�I�i F1M r�2�! `�. ► - ;:,r`6`..�.. ;�U � .�1�,''\"�►°ice'= IBL WIN I yY� M ww-r r' \7Vr I� I !� Garl •� ■� wrs. �' aala ■ I � ww� 4 s � t t =�f I > 'J i i\2�'.;.11.1� � ....a iii C.1 t��•' ^ � o \ "+--•+�._..-.-�.��— - ® ik'i:i.IJG�Jk.�•'.'F � --•' +, y r�s � �-ti , ':, ' ,Yt * , io U — ? 0.1 F r , } , Y • • ,y, str �Ll ��.tyil�.1'•,F.Y� _ �� ( �t '. .F 4 4f � l • y'`� zrs- �tyr `. 'nsi4iL y., . "_ • ry 4a .i `� I rl�ifi.'�tA-lxys,..ry • F� i•wYpC-.u5Hv � 1� � `, k9�'F�t dL_j �fi. ' i i•a¢a t r IC iv � � �f>?� eC � 7j � Prf�- r z �1 US h J Y I Fy ft ! R9 �, • _, ems' r Z i rY R,, �•� yr �1 51r i`1 0 \1 p J ! w- L' 4� 1 VMy 3 n � i'1 Tashi tY:. s 4 r !r'� dIy1J Ij 1`' I�Q 1 • 'C� t!L .� f�' -1 • ° w ;fiw )99 wk ni fi. f I h� r,a. En. 1 ON �.hS1:24�5'" SCI I S�1 i Ix ou { iY4'' A�y�1+A I�•r.� �,K�f1 T-�I��ti. I SS�f I •t M y r k)RE) �LL I n iro-n .tT Y 7 Y: � �"� I � � •I !{,' r°` !^•1 Cam'.. . y . r ♦ p Y 1 Y I 4 •c�5 G.�{{��� ��, c� �I� �_A I ��-�f Die_ : 14..i v 1 Ls L yfi,Sll CL � "Tr_f �s•..I �ifw t R.':.1 )j tk';'S. }s3Trt}may ?NYC x; r I sfk, ,z7 � U.1 .t MI'�4��� .N' ^A�ZL�I • �te� � �t I �YLFi_ —f�! > � • 2 ` �s', sat Zp..�,[• 44-�>�� 1 r II ax� , ♦ /�y ! pA ,.` v`1 n �Y+ f�. CSI M. j� AP IIC". • � � 7 1 .t J� • u � �Gy� • .�. I � ice'.`•�� � ` u�i�I���a.i{� . y a 5u sr•'egs Sta:P Asa ....w. fi n � i z3 � � 1 • ��� mt • 1 Muizw I \ 0) �� Ul Q� D ' Co W1 N1 .af Iaaai SIMILS MILS r a 111 { "Nr,'r- tl�i 'd� c W'iU O cu CL ialfal 3"'yi J lillial Y lilaMMM - Q...„i fiILiifflIL - •x. lli{a ,* • • h .nom l�aILil Maallal� �' "'^• r IiMILMaILV '�' �-� ^f a � �4"zC1y i ny ti �����%ate +;. �lll'' ,• � � y � ' •M �\ilMl1 � ;� ffffl' f •i l + -rt S � i Si> tt. - l' y[e°. { ,1 O 7 7 Jl �3 CIZ 9i Re-Co/?-oG PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-16 VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18817 - HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA, LLC APRIL 25, 2012 Page 6 improvement agreement and bonds executed by the developer, prior to building permit issuance. 14) Where the property line coincides with a building wall on Plans 1 and 2, the property line shall be moved approximately six (6) feet away from the building wall to allow openings and projections on that building wall. Maintenance and Use Easements shall be provided, as necessary, to allow the adjoining lot to use this area for private open space. Environmental Mitigation 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. ' Project No.DRC2011-000641.SUBTT18817 and DRC2011-00891 Completion Date K. Grading • 1. Grading of the subject property shall be In accordance with California Building Code,City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. As a custom-lot subdivision, the following requirements shall be met: a. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all on-site drainage facilities necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Official prior to final map approval and prior to the issuance of grading permits. b. Appropriate easements for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducted onto or over adjacent parcels, are to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of grading and building permits. C. On-site drainage improvements, necessary for dewatering and protecting the subdivided properties, are to be installed prior to issuance of building permits for construction upon any parcel that may be subject to drainage flows entering, leaving, or within a parcel relative to which a building permit is requested. • d. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Department for approval prior to the issuance of grading and building permits(this may be on an incremental or composite basis) e. All slope banks in excess of 5 feet in vertical height shall be seeded with native grasses or planted with ground cover for erosion control upon completion of grading or some other alternative method of erosion control shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Official. In addition, a permanent irrigation system shall be provided. This requirement does not release the applicant/developer from compliance with the slope planting requirements of Section 17.08.040 of the Development Code. 6. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer. 7. If human remains are discovered on-site before or during grading, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 and California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5. L. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets —I—I- (measured from street centerline): 50 total feet on Arrow Route I I • 33 total feet on Baker Avenue 2. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. B, C, BD - 157 Protect No.DRC2011-000641 SUBTT18817 and DRC2011-00891 Completion Date M. Street Improvements 1 Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010,no person shall make connections from a _1 source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless,in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval,as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable,safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings,structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Curb& A.C. Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail Other Arrow Route (c) X X X (f) Baker Avenue X X X X (f) 3. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public • and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way,fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. C. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or _/_/_ reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR,or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No.6 at intersections and No.5 along streets,a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City _/_/_ Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. • B, C, & D - 158 Project No.DRC2011-000641. SUBTT18817 and DRC2011-00891 1 Completion Date f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times _/_/_ with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are • required. A cash deposit shall be provided to coverthe cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first _/_I_ plan check. 4. Street trees,a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger,shall be installed per City Standards in _/_I_ accordance with the City's street tree program. 5. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend(box below)and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required,tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The Engineering Services Department reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information,contact the Project Engineer. Min. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Qty. • Arrow Route Lagerstroemia Pink-Red Crape 2 -feet 20 -feet 15- Fill hybrid Myrtle O.C. gallon in "Tuscarora" Baker Avenue Pistacia chinensis Chinese 5 -feet 50 -feet 15- Fill Pistache O.C. gallon in Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 6. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance _/_/_ with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. N. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and _/_/_ Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. • B, C, & D - 159 Project No.DRC2011-000641 SUBTT18817 and DRC2011-00891 Completion Date O. Drainage and Flood Control 1. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to _I_I_• final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage l l entering the property from adjacent areas. P. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, _/_/_ water,gas,electric power,telephone,and cable TV(ail underground)in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the I /_ Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. Q. General Requirements and Approvals • 1. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City,covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation,prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50%of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills,and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: R. Security Lighting 1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. 2. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings;with direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development • 3. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. B, C, SD - 160 Project No.DRC2011-000641. SUBTT18817 and DRC2011-00891 f Completion Date S. Security Hardware • 1. A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors. 2. One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors. If windows are within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used. 3. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • • B, C, BD - 161 �J SIGN-IN SHEET PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING April 25, 2012 NAME COMPANY ADDRESS z D