HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015/12/16 - Agenda Packetcity of �
NC"C) Ul,A1VlU1JCrA
10500 Civic Center Drive � Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 -3801
City Office: (909) 477 -2700
AGENDAS
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD
SUCCESSOR AGENCY
HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY
PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
CITY COUNCIL
WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 16, 2015
REGULAR MEETINGS
1St and 3rd Wednesdays + 7:00 P.M.
ORDER OF BUSINESS
CLOSED SESSION Tapia Conference Room ................. 5:00 P.M.
Call to Order
Public Communications
City Manager Announcements
Conduct of Closed Session
REGULAR MEETINGS Council Chambers .......................... 7:00 P.M.
MFMRFRC
MAYOR
MAYOR PRO TEM
COUNCIL MEMBERS
CITY MANAGER
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY CLERK
CITY TREASURER
L. Dennis Michael
Sam Spagnolo
William Alexander
Lynne B. Kennedy
Diane Williams
John R. Gillison
James L. Markman
Janice C. Reynolds
James C. Frost
i
�s
4ft
INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC
Allw MW
• OOCAMONGA
TO ADDRESS THE FIRE BOARD, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL
The Fire Board, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council encourage free expression of all points
of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have
already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a
spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the
audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience.
The public may address the Fire Board, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council by filling out a
speaker card and submitting it to the City Clerk. The speaker cards are located on the wall at the back of the
Chambers, at the front desk behind the staff table and at the City Clerk's desk. If as part of your presentation, you
would like to display visual material, please see the City Clerk before the meeting commences. Any handouts for the
Fire Board, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority or City Council should be given to the City Clerk for
distribution.
During "Public Communications," your name will be called to speak on any item listed or not listed on the agenda in the
order in which it was received. The "Public Communications" period will not exceed one hour prior to the
commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a
topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these
business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda
commences. Any other "Public Communications" which have not concluded during this one -hour period may resume
after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per
individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak.
If you are present to speak on an "Advertised Public Hearing" or on an "Administrative Hearing" Item(s), your name will
be called when that item is being discussed, in the order in which it was received. Comments are to be limited to five
minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring
to speak.
AGENDA BACK -UP MATERIALS
Staff reports and back -up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter, the City's
Public Library( -ies) and on the City's website. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the desk located
behind the staff table during the Council meeting.
LIVE BROADCAST
Fire Board, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3
for those with cable television access. Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each
month at 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The City has added the option for customers without cable access to view the
meetings "on- demand" from their computers. The added feature of "Streaming Video On Demand" is available on the
City's website at www.cityofrc.us /cityhall /council /videos. asp for those with Hi- bandwidth (DSL /Cable Modem) or
Low - bandwidth (Dial -up) Internet service.
The Fire Board, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council meet regularly on the first and third
Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive.
Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council.
Copies of the agendas and minutes can be found @ www.cityofrc.us
If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please
contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477 -2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the
meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility.
Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.
Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session.
i
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY,
La
,,�jj
af.n }iO &C"ONCA
HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY,
PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
DECEMBER 16, 2015
5:00 P.M. - CLOSED SESSION
7L-LA.
CALL TO ORDER - TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM
Al. Roll Call: Mayor Michael
Mayor Pro Tern Spagnolo
Council Members Alexander, Kennedy and Williams
CLOSED SESSION CALLED TO ORDER AS THE
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL.
B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) �jl
C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S�
D. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS
(NO DISCUSSION OR ACTION WILL OCCUR)
IL
E. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION - TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM
E1. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTH SIDE OF
ARROW HIGHWAY, WEST OF ROCHESTER AVENUE IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL
NUMBER 0229 - 012 -03; NEGOTIATING PARTIES NETTIE NIELSEN REPRESENTING
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND SILVA ZENEIAN REPRESENTING GOALS;
REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. — CITY.
E2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT
CODE SECTION 54956.8 REGARDING REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH
SIDE OF TOWN CENTER DR, EAST OF HAVEN AND WEST OF TERRA VISTA PARKWAY
WEST, IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBER 1077 - 422 -58. NEGOTIATING PARTIES: LINDA
DANIELS AND MIKE COSTELLO, FIRE CHIEF ON BEHALF OF THE DISTRICT AND BOB
MARTIN ON BEHALF OF WESTERN LAND PROPERTIES. UNDER NEGOTIATION:
PRICE AND TERMS. - FIRE
F. RECESS
CLOSED SESSION TO RECESS TO THE REGULAR FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC
FINANCING AUTHORITY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY AND
CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT CITY HALL,
LOCATED AT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA.
i
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY,
HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY,
2
La
,,�jj
.;LlJ J fdO &C"ONCA
PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
DECEMBER 16, 2015
G. REGULAR MEETING
CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING
AUTHORITY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY AND CITY COUNCIL
WILL BE CALLED TO ORDER. IT IS THE INTENT TO CONCLUDE THE MEETINGS BY 10:00
P.M., UNLESS EXTENDED BY CONCURRENCE OF THE FIRE BOARD, AUTHORITY BOARD
AND COUNCIL.
G1. Pledge of Allegiance
G2. Roll Call: Mayor Michael
Mayor Pro Tern Spagnolo
Council Members Alexander, Kennedy and Williams
H. ANNOUNCEMENTS /PRESENTATIONS
H1. Administration of Oath of Office to newly appointed Park and Recreation Commissioner Peter
Villegas.
H2. Presentation of the Building Industry Association's 2015 "Good Government Award" by BIA
Baldy View Chapter's Chief Executive Officer Carlos Rodriguez.
H3. Proclamation acknowledging the City of Yountville as the City's first Rancho Enterprise
Geographic Information Systems (REGIS) customer and International City /County
Management Association (ICMA) Award recipient.
I. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection District, Public
Financing Authority Board, Successor Agency, Housing Successor Agency and City Council on
any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Fire Protection District, Public
Financing Authority Board, Successor Agency, Housing Successor Agency and City Council from
addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Board, Public Financing Authority
Board, Successor Agency, Housing Successor Agency and City Council may receive testimony and set
the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the
Mayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be
addressed directly to the Fire Board, Authority Board, Successor Agency, Housing Successor Agency
or City Council not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and
courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker,
making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting.
The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the
business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic
contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for
these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business
portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during
this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed.
i
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY,
HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY,
3
La
,,�jj
af.n }iO &C"ONCA
PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
DECEMBER 16, 2015
CONSENT CALENDARS:
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They
will be acted upon by the Fire Board /Successor Agency/ Housing Successor Agency /Authority
Board /Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Fire
Board /Successor Agency/Housing Successor AgencylAuthority Board /Council Member for
discussion.
J. CONSENT CALENDAR - FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
J1. Consideration to approve Minutes of: December 2, 2015 (Regular Meeting)
- --
J2. Consideration to approve Check Register dated November 23, 2015 through December 8,
1
2015 and Electronic Debit Register for the month of November 2015 for the total of
$545,968.33.
J3. Consideration to approve Plans, Specifications, and Estimates and authorization to advertise
the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District All -Risk Training
13
Center, to be funded from Account No, 3288501 - 5650/1735288 -6314.
RESOLUTION NO. FD15 -026
16
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION
BOARD APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE ALL -
RISK TRAINING CENTER IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY TO ADVERTISE TO
RECEIVE BIDS
J4. Consideration of approval of a Resolution adopting Fire District salary schedules for Fiscal
20
Year 2015/16 including a part -time employee benefit summary.
RESOLUTION NO. FD15 -027
21
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SALARY SCHEDULES FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2015 -16 INCLUDING A PART -TIME EMPLOYEE
BENEFIT SUMMARY
J5. Consideration of approval of a Contract Extension between CALAMP Radio Statellite
Integrators, Inc. and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Automatic Vehicle Location (AVL)
33
System extended warranty and wireless fees for Fiscal Year 2015/2016 in the total amount
of $71,340 to be funded from Fire District Account Numbers 3281501 -5300 $4,830; 3282502-
5300 $3,860; 3283501 -5300 $970 and from City Vehicle and Equipment Replacement Fund
Account Number 1712001 -5300 $61,680 all in Contract Services.
i
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY,
HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY,
4
af.n
La
,,�jj
}iO &C"ONCA
PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
DECEMBER 16, 2015
K. CONSENT CALENDAR - SUCCESSOR AGENCY
K1.
Consideration to approve Minutes of: December 2, 2015 (Regular Meeting)
___
L. CONSENT CALENDAR - HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY
L1.
Review and approval of the Housing Successor Agency's Fiscal Year 2014/15 Annual
34
Report.
L2.
Consideration to approve a Certificate of Acceptance for the acquisition of an approximate 4
41
acre site generally located north of Base Line Road and west of Day Creek Boulevard and
the recordation of a temporary construction easement agreement for slope, drainage and
maintenance purposes on the property.
IF
M. CONSENT CALENDAR - PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
M1.
Consideration to approve Minutes of: December 2, 2015 (Regular Meeting)
N. CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL
N1.
Consideration to approve Minutes of: December 2, 2015 (Regular Meeting)
- --
N2.
Consideration to approve Check Register and payroll dated November 23, 2015 through
December 8, 2015 Electronic Debit Register for the month of November 2015 for the total of
62
$6,029,304.89.
N3.
Continuation of Resolution No. 15 -093, proclaiming the existence of a Local Drought
74
Emergency under Government Code Section 8630 and Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code
Section 2.36.
N4.
Consideration to authorize appropriation of $10,000 into Account 1380501 -5152 (Software)
75
for the purchase of WebEOC Incident Management Software Modules and $20,623 into
Account 1380501 -5603 (Capital Equipment) for the purchase of Hazmat Detection equipment
to be reimbursed by the FY 2014 Homeland Security Grant.
N5.
Consideration to accept the Illuminated Street Name Sign Replacement - FY 13/14 Project,
76
Contract No. 14 -151 as Complete; Release the Faithful Performance Bond; Accept a
Maintenance Bond; Authorize the release the Labor and Materials Bond; Approve a
Resolution Authorizing the Public Works Services Director to File a Notice of Completion,
Release the Retention 35 Days after Acceptance and Approve the Final Contract Amount of
$87,008.11.
RESOLUTION NO. 15 -213
78
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE ILLUMINATED
STREET NAME SIGN REPLACEMENT - FY 13/14 PROJECT
CONTRACT, NO. 14 -151 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY,
HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, 5
La PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND
,,�jj CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
afn }iO &C"ONCA
DECEMBER 16, 2015
N6. Consideration to accept the Department of Innovation and Technology (DoIT) Tenant 79
Improvement Project, Contract No. 15 -149 as Complete; Release the Faithful Performance
Bond; Accept a Maintenance Bond; Authorize the release the Labor and Materials Bond;
Approve a Resolution Authorizing the Public Works Services Director to File a Notice of
Completion, Release the Retention 35 Days after Acceptance and Approve the Final
Contract Amount of $81,550.88.
RESOLUTION NO. 15 -214 81
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE DEPARTMENT OF
INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY (DoIT) TENANT IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT CONTRACT, NO. 15 -149 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING
OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
N7. Consideration to approve plans and specifications for the construction of a Family Restroom
at LoanMart Stadium at the Epicenter Project and authorize the City Clerk to advertise the 82
"Notice Inviting Bids ", to be funded from account 1120401 - 5650/1911120 -0 (Park
Development).
RESOLUTION NO. 15 -215 83
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A FAMILY RESTROOM AT LOANMART
STADIUM AT THE EPICENTER PROJECT IN SAID CITY AND
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE
TO RECEIVE BIDS
N8. Consideration of approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 16226 -2, located 87
north of Day Creek Boulevard and west of Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by BMC Rancho
Etiwanda, LLC.
RESOLUTION NO. 15 -216 89
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR
TRACT 16226 -2
N9. Consideration of approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 18034, located on 90
the southwest corner of Chickasaw Road and East Avenue, submitted by RC Proj. 1, LLC.
RESOLUTION NO. 15 -217
92
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR
TRACT 18034
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY,
HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, 6
La PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND
,,�jj CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
afn }iO &C"ONCA
DECEMBER 16, 2015
N10. Consideration of approval of a Resolution adopting salary schedules for Fiscal Year 2015/16, 93
including a part -time employee benefit summary.
RESOLUTION NO. 15 -218 94
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SALARY SCHEDULES
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/16, INCLUDING A PART -TIME EMPLOYEE
BENEFIT SUMMARY AND CITY COUNCIL BENEFITS
N11. Consideration to approve the purchase of Fixed Position Automatic License Plate Reader 111
Cameras in the amount of $100,000.00 from Federal Asset Seizure Funds, Fund 1197701.
N12. Consideration to authorize the expansion of the Public Safety Video Network funded from 121
Account Number 1017701 in the amount of $72,100.00.
N13. Consideration to approve the Amended and Restated Mobile Home Accord for a period of
ten years with the following mobile home parks located in Rancho Cucamonga: Alta Laguna, 151
Alta Vista, Casa Volante, Chaparral Heights, The Pines, Ramona Villa, and Sycamore Villa.
N14. Consideration to approve the plans and specifications for the "Construction of Los Amigos
Park" and authorize the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids ", to be funded from 164
Account No. 1235305 - 5650/1754235 -0.
RESOLUTION NO. 15 -219 I 165
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "CONSTRUCTION OF LOS AMIGOS
PARK" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY
CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
N15. Consideration to extend the application deadline date for the West -Side Districts Citizens' 169
Oversight Committee to January 19, 2016.
N16. Consideration of approval of a Contract Extension between CALAMP Radio Statellite
Integrators, Inc. and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Automatic Vehicle Location (AVL) 170
System extended warranty and wireless fees for Fiscal Year 2015/2016 in the total amount
of $71,340 to be funded from Fire District Account Numbers 3281501 -5300 $4,830; 3282502-
5300 $3,860; 3283501 -5300 $970 and from City Vehicle and Equipment Replacement Fund
Account Number 1712001 -5300 $61,680 all in Contract Services.
I11 O. CONSENT ORDINANCES 11
The following Ordinances have been introduced for first reading. Second readings are
expected to be routine and non - controversial. The City Council will act upon them at one
time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for
discussion by a Council Member.
y
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY,
HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY,
PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
DECEMBER 16, 2015
01. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 882 approving Victoria Community Plan Amendment
DRC2015 -00390 changing the Victoria Community Plan Zoning Designation for 10.94 acres
of land from Medium (M) Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) to Village Commercial (VC)
related to the construction of a 100,135 square foot 9- building multi- tenant retail center at the
northwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road. The Amendment also
includes changing the zoning designation for 4 contiguous acres of land from Medium (M)
Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low Medium (LM) Residential (4 -8 dwelling units
per acre) and a text amendment clarifying development standards — APN's: 1089 - 031 -15,
16, 35 and a portion of 1089 - 031 -14.
ORDINANCE NO. 882 (SECOND READING)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APROVING VICTORIA COMMUNITY
PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2015- 00390, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE
VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN ZONING DESIGNATION FOR 10.94
ACRES OF LAND FROM MEDIUM (M) RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING
UNITS PER ACRE) TO VILLAGE COMMERCIAL (VC) RELATED TO
THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 100,135 SQUARE FOOT 9- BUILDING
MULTI - TENANT RETAIL CENTER AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND BASE LINE ROAD. THE AMENDMENT
ALSO INCLUDES CHANGING THE ZONING DESIGNATION FOR 4
CONTIGUOUS ACRES OF LAND FROM MEDIUM (M) RESIDENTIAL (8-
14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW MEDIUM (LM)
RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND A TEXT
AMENDMENT CLARIFYING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS; AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORTTHEREOF — APN'S: 1089-031-15,16,
35 AND A PORTION OF 1089 - 031 -14.
02. Second Reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 883 adding Chapter 2.14 to the Municipal
Code relating to Electronic and Paperless Filing of Fair Political Practices Commission
(FPPC) Campaign Disclosure Statements.
ORDINANCE NO. 883 (SECOND READING)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 2.14 TO THE
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ELECTRONIC AND PAPERLESS
FILING OF FAIR POLITICAL PRACTICES COMMISSION (FPPC)
CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS.
P. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
CITY COUNCIL
The following items have been advertised and /or posted as public hearings as required by
law. The Mayor will open the meeting to receive public testimony.
7
171
172
176
177
i
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY,
HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY,
8
La
,,�jj
af.n }iO &C"ONCA
PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
DECEMBER 16, 2015
P1. TIME EXTENSION DRC2015 -01084 — WSI HIGHLAND INVESTMENTS, LLC - A request to
180
extend the duration of an existing Development Agreement (DRC2003- 00411) by an
additional one (1) year, an agreement for an approved project of 269 single - family lots on
approximately 168.77 acres of land within the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located north of
the Southern California Edison corridor between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue; APNs:
1087 - 081 -03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, and 09. Related Files: Annexation DRC2003- 01051,
Specific Plan Amendment DRC2003- 00409, General Plan Amendment DRC2003- 00410,
Development Agreement Amendment DRC2003 -00411 M and Time Extension DRC2014-
00876. Staff has found the project to be within the scope of the project covered by a prior
Environmental Impact Report certified by the City Council on July 21, 2004 (State Clearing
House #2003081085) by Resolution 04 -240 and does not raise or create new environmental
impacts not already considered in the Environmental Impact Report.
RESOLUTION NO. 15 -219
241
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A ONE (1) YEAR
EXTENSION OF AN EXISTING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
(DRC2003- 00411), AN AGREEMENT FOR AN APPROVED PROJECT
OF 269 SINGLE - FAMILY LOTS ON APPROXIMATELY 168.77 ACRES
OF LAND WITHIN THE ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED
NORTH OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CORRIDOR
BETWEEN ETIWANDA AVENUE AND EAST AVENUE - APNs: 1087-
081-03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, and 09.
Q. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
CITY COUNCIL
The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements.
Q1. Consideration to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the
contract in the amount of $288,975.00, to the lowest responsive bidder, Vido Samarzich, Inc.,
244
and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $28,897.50, for the
Red Hill Park Lake Modernization Project to be funded from Capital Reserve Funds, Account
No. 1025001 - 5650/1897025 -0 and appropriate an additional amount of $317,872.50 to
Account No. 1025001 - 5650/1897025 -0 from Capital Reserve Fund balance.
Q2. Consideration of Adoption of Urgency Zoning Ordinance No. 884, An Interim Ordinance of
247
the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga prohibiting all commercial cannabis uses
in the City, including deliveries, prohibiting all medical marijuana cultivation, including
cultivation for medical use by a qualified patient or primary caregiver, and declaring the
urgency thereof.
i
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY,
HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY,
9
La
,,�jj
af.n }iO &C"ONCA
PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
DECEMBER 16, 2015
ORDINANCE NO. 884
251
AN INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA PROHIBITING ALL COMMERCIAL CANNABIS
USES IN THE CITY, INCLUDING DELIVERIES, PROHIBITING ALL
MEDICAL MARIJUANA CULTIVATION, INCLUDING CULTIVATION FOR
MEDICAL USE BY A QUALIFIED PATIENT OR PRIMARY CAREGIVER,
AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF.
Q3. Consideration of an Ordinance of the City of Rancho Cucamonga amending the Rancho
258
Cucamonga Municipal Code to extend the time limit for appealing Administrative Citations
and applying for hardship waivers to 30 Days.
ORDINANCE NO. 885 (FIRST READING)
259
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDING THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO
EXTEND THE TIME LIMIT FOR APPEALING ADMINISTRATIVE
CITATIONS AND APPLYING FOR HARDSHIP WAIVERS TO 30 DAYS
R. COUNCIL BUSINESS
The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion.
R1. Discussion of residential monthly parking permit fee for the Metrolink station.
261
R2. Consideration of the City Council Community Services Subcommittee's recommendation
263
regarding an appointment to the Park and Recreation Commission.
R3. INTER - AGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the
- --
meetings that were attended.)
R4. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council
---
Member.)
S. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
T. ADJOURNMENT
CERTIFICATION
I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or
my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the
foregoing agenda was posted on December 10, 2015, seventy -two (72) hours prior to the
meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,
California, and on the City's website.
c
inda A. Troyan, MMC
City Clerk Services Director
City of Rancho Cucamonga
December 2, 2015
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CLOSED SESSION, SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING,
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
AND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS MINUTES
A. 5:00 P.M. - CLOSED SESSION
CALL TO ORDER - TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM
The City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a closed session on Wednesday, December 2, 2015 in the
Tapia Conference Room at the Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor
L. Dennis Michael called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m.
Present were Council Members: Bill Alexander, Lynne Kennedy, Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tern Sam Spagnolo.
and Mayor L. Dennis Michael.
Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; James L. Markman, City Attorney; Linda Daniels, Assistant City
Manager; Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager /Administrative Services; and Jeff Bloom, Deputy City
Manager /Economic and Community Development.
B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)
The following closed session items were considered:
E1. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE
ROAD AND DAY CREEK BOULEVARD; NEGOTIATING PARTIES LINDA DANIELS, ASSISTANT
CITY MANAGER AND GARY BAUER, LEWIS OPERATING CORPORATION; REGARDING PRICE
AND TERMS. — HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY
E2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 7418 AND 7422 ARCHIBALD AVENUE;
NEGOTIATING PARTIES LINDA DANIELS, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER AND TODD COTTLE,
7418 ARCHIBALD LLC; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. — HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY
IF C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)
No public communications were made.
IF-- D. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS
No discussion or actions were taken.
IF-- F. Recess
The closed session recessed at 5:53 p.m. with no action taken.
* D R A F T*
December 2, 2015 1 Special City Council Meeting (6PM) I Fire Protection District, Successor Agency,
Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings (7PM) Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 1 of 10
G. SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL ONLY
CALL TO ORDER - 6:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
The City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a special meeting on Wednesday, December 2, 2015 in the
Council Chambers at City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor L.
Dennis Michael called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
Present were Council Members: Bill Alexander, Lynne Kennedy, Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tern Sam Spagnolo
and Mayor L. Dennis Michael.
Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Linda Daniels, Assistant City Manager; James L. Markman, City
Attorney; Linda A. Troyan, City Clerk Services Director and Shirr'I Griffin, Office Specialist Il.
Council Member Alexander led the Pledge of Allegiance.
Mayor Michael called for a moment of silence for those who lost their lives during an active shooter incident which
unfolded earlier in the day in the community of San Bernardino at the Inland Regional Center, and said that the
meeting would be adjourned in their memory.
IF-- H. ITEMS OF BUSINESS
H1. Public Communication.
No public communications were made.
H2. Presentation
of Service Pins to City of
Rancho Cucamonga City
Council Members and
Employees.
John Gillison, City Manager, recognized the following
for their years of service with
the City. Employees who
attended the Council Meeting are marked with an asterisk ( *).
CITY EMPLOYEES
Shawn Epstein
15 YEARS
25 YEARS
5 YEARS
Brian Fllon
Claude Beaumont
Romeo Dayrit*
Isaiah Aguilera*
Jeffrey Geith
Jason Daly
Timothy Fejeran*
Clifford Baker
Cristine Gorka*
Kelley Donaldson*
Patrick Gallagher
Taro Barag
Deborah Grimes
Matthew Eddy
Vivian Garcia
Fred Lyn*
Patrick Hediger*
Theresa Gates
Carole Hart*
Chris Miladelaroca
Mireya (Murry) Hepner*
Ty Harris
Patrick Jenkins
Francisco Oaxaca
Quang Leba
Sopheak Kong*
David Larkin*
Bret Saley
Hank Merenda
Jorge Padilla
Tyrone Quaintance
Bryan Snyder
Annette Mumolo*
Peter Rouch
Lirio Rosas*
Janet Temkin
Jennifer Nakamura
Ryan Samples
Diane Williams*
10 YEARS
Beverly Noonan
Michael Smith*
30 YEARS
Tim Alford
Bret Rambaud
Valerie Victorino*
Walter Stickney*
Daniel Aviles
Scott Rapp
Ray Wimberly*
35 YEARS
Matthew Bar
Antonio Romero, Jr.
Michelle Yancy
Laura Bliese*
Aaron Segaar
20 YEARS
Thomas Acosta*
Candyce Burnett*
Sheila Sexton*
Gilbert Amador
Matthew Clark
Adam Tuckerman
Rebecca Davies
Robert Coberly*
Caroline Vera
Marlene Hallmeyer*
Chad Comeau*
Fabian Villenas
Phillip Ortega
Daniel Correa
Edward Watson
Eric Rico
Oscar Delgado
Ryan Wilson
Charles Solano
Joseph Duguay, II
Linda Wyman*
(cont'd)
* D R
A F T*
December 2, 2015 1 Special City Council Meeting (6PM) I Fire Protection District, Successor Agency,
Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings (7PM) Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 2 of 10
POLICE DEPARTMENT
5 YEARS
Amy Baker
Daniel Berumen
Bryan Bosowski
Andrea Hernandez
Janna Kovensky
William Stringer
Melinda Young
10 YEARS
Richard Buss
Debra Cabana
Gloria Gomez*
Luis Ortiz
Charles Petersen
Evan Roberts
Anthony Thomas
15 YEARS
Janice Clayton
Randy Rouse
Shelley Truesdell
20 YEARS
Robert Harm
Mayor Michael and the Members of the City Council presented service pins and thanked the recipients for their
service to the City.
IF-- I. RECESS
Meeting recessed at 6: 23 p.m.
G. REGULAR MEETING
CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
The regular meetings of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing
Authority, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council on Wednesday, December 2, 2015 in the Council
Chambers at City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor L. Dennis
Michael called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
Present were Council Members: Bill Alexander, Lynne Kennedy, Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tern Sam Spagnolo
and Mayor L. Dennis Michael.
Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Linda Daniels, Assistant City Manager; James L. Markman, City
Attorney; Linda A. Troyan, City Clerk Services Director and Shirr'I Griffin, Office Specialist 11.
Council Member Kennedy led the Pledge of Allegiance.
IF-- H. ANNOUNCEMENTS /PRESENTATIONS
H1. None.
Mayor Michael called for a moment of silence for those who lost their lives during an active shooter incident which
unfolded earlier in the day in the community of San Bernardino at the Inland Regional Center, and said that the
meeting would be adjourned in their memory.
I. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
11. Gwyn Frost, on behalf of the Etiwanda Historical Society, announced their fundraiser at Shakey's Pizza
Parlor Tuesday, December 8, 2015 from 6 -9 p.m.
12. Janet Walton offered a story and prayer.
13. Bill Hanlon spoke about voters and Measure A.
14. John Lyons expressed sympathy for the victims of the earlier incident, spoke about the holiday season,
shopping, and dining in the city.
* D R A F T
December 2, 2015 1 Special City Council Meeting (6PM) I Fire Protection District, Successor Agency,
Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings (7PM) Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 3 of 10
CONSENT CALENDARS:
J. CONSENT CALENDAR - FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
J1. Consideration to approve Minutes of: November 17, 2015 (Special Meeting)
J2. Consideration to approve Check Register dated November 10, 2015 through November 19, 2015 for
the total of $77,087.66.
MOTION: Moved by Vice Chair Spagnolo, seconded by Board Member Alexander, to approve the Staff
Recommendations in the Staff Reports for Consent Calendar Items J1. and J2. Motion carried 5 -0.
K. CONSENT CALENDAR - SUCCESSOR AGENCY
K1. Consideration to approve Minutes of: November 17, 2015 (Special Meeting)
MOTION: Moved by Council Member Alexander, seconded by Council Member Williams to approve the Minutes
of November 17, 2015. Motion carried 5 -0.
L. CONSENT CALENDAR - PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
L1. Consideration to approve Minutes of: November 17, 2015 (Special Meeting)
MOTION: Moved by Authority Member Williams, seconded by Authority Vice -Chair Spagnolo to approve the
Minutes of November 17, 2015. Motion carried 5 -0.
IF- M. CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL
M1. Consideration to approve Minutes of: November 17, 2015 (Special Meeting)
M2. Consideration to approve Check Register dated November 10, 2015 through November 19, 2015 and
payroll ending November 19, 2015 for the total of $3,391,922.67.
M3. Consideration of approval to amend contract for Law Enforcement Services to assume County area
responsibilities and receive a credit to the Schedule A in the amount of $39,042 effective January 9,
2016 through June 30, 2016.
M4. Consideration to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. 09136070/014064936 -A in the amount of
$78,855.98, for the Ramona Avenue Storm Drain and Pavement Rehabilitation from Foothill Boulevard
to south of Pacific Electric Trail project, Contract No. 14 -120.
M5. Consideration to authorize the purchase of two (2) Traffic Signal Controller Cabinets from Econolite, of
Anaheim, California, in the amount of $118,830.24, in accordance with Request for Bid ( "RFB ") #15/16-
009 to be funded from Account Number 1712001 -5603 (Equipment/Vehicle Replacement Fund).
M6. Consideration to donate three "EZ GO Express L6" gasoline golf carts valued at $36,556.48 to the
County of San Bernardino for use by our Law Enforcement Staff to patrol the Victoria Gardens Mall,
Pacific Electric Trail, Local Parks and other areas within the City.
M7. Consideration of approval of a request to summarily vacate a 25 -foot wide Storm Drain Easement,
located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and the SR -210 Freeway (V -231) — APN 201 - 272 -23
Related Files: DRC2008- 00464, DRC2013- 00811.
* D R A F T*
December 2, 2015 1 Special City Council Meeting (6PM) I Fire Protection District, Successor Agency,
Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings (7PM) Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 4 of 10
RESOLUTION NO. 15 -210
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF A
25 -FOOT WIDE STORM DRAIN EASEMENT, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST
CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND THE SR 210 FREEWAY
M8. Consideration of approval of Real Estate Purchase Contract with the Howard Duerson Chastain, JR
2004 Trust for the purchase of Real Property generally located at the northeast corner of Arrow Route
and Rochester Avenue; (APN 229 - 021 -97) and the appropriation of $1,895,000 for purchase and
$40,000 for Closing Costs and contingency for a total of $1,935,000 from Fund 25 to Account No.
1025001 -5600 Capital Outlay Land.
MOTION: Moved by Mayor Pro Tern Spagnolo, seconded by Council Member Kennedy, to approve the Staff
Recommendations in the Staff Reports for Consent Calendar Items M1. through M8. Motion carried 5 -0.
N. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
CITY COUNCIL
N1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2015 -00388 - LEWIS
RETAIL CENTERS — A request to change the General Plan Land Use Designation for 10.94 acres of
land from Low Medium (LM) Residential to Neighborhood Commercial (NC) related to the construction
of a 100,135 square foot 9- building multi- tenant retail center located at the northwest corner of Day
Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road in the Medium (M) Zoning District of the Victoria Community
Plan — APN's: 1089 - 031 -15, 16, 35 and a portion of 1089 - 031 -14. Related cases: Design Review
DRC2015- 00386, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2015- 00390, Tentative Parcel Map
SUBTPM19637, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015 -00387 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2015-
00391. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2015-
00390 - LEWIS RETAIL CENTERS — A request to change the Victoria Community Plan Zoning
Designation for 10.94 acres of land from Medium (M) Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) to Village
Commercial (VC) related to the construction of a 100,135 square foot 9- building multi- tenant retail
center at the northwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road. The Amendment also
includes changing the zoning designation for 4 contiguous acres of land from Medium (M) Residential
(8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low Medium (LM) Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) and a text
amendment clarifying development standards — APN's: 1089 - 031 -15, 16, 35 and a portion of 1089-
031-14. Related cases: Design Review DRC2015- 00386, General Plan Amendment DRC2015- 00388,
Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19637, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015 -00387 and Uniform Sign
Program DRC2015- 00391. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental
impacts for consideration.
RESOLUTION NO. 15 -211
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
DRC2015- 00388, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE
DESIGNATION FOR 10.94 ACRES OF LAND FROM LOW MEDIUM (LM)
RESIDENTIAL TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (NC) RELATED TO THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A 100,135 SQUARE FOOT 9- BUILDING MULTI - TENANT
RETAIL CENTER LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF DAY CREEK
BOULEVARD AND BASE LINE ROAD IN THE MEDIUM (M) ZONING DISTRICT
OF THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF — APN'S: 1089-031-15,16, 35 AND A PORTION OF 1089 - 031 -14.
* D R A F T*
December 2, 2015 1 Special City Council Meeting (6PM) I Fire Protection District, Successor Agency,
Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings (7PM) Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 5 of 10
ORDINANCE NO. 882 (FIRST READING)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN
AMENDMENT DRC2015- 00390, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE VICTORIA
COMMUNITY PLAN ZONING DESIGNATION FOR 10.94 ACRES OF LAND FROM
MEDIUM (M) RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO VILLAGE
COMMERCIAL (VC) RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 100,135 SQUARE
FOOT 9- BUILDING MULTI - TENANT RETAIL CENTER AT THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND BASE LINE ROAD. THE
AMENDMENT ALSO INCLUDES CHANGING THE ZONING DESIGNATION FOR
4 CONTIGUOUS ACRES OF LAND FROM MEDIUM (M) RESIDENTIAL (8 -14
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL (4 -8
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND A TEXT AMENDMENT CLARIFYING
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF — APN'S: 1089 - 031 -15, 16, 35 AND A PORTION OF 1089 - 031 -14.
John Gillison, City Manager, introduced Candyce Burnett, Planning Director and Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate
Planner, who reviewed the project via a PowerPoint presentation and responded to questions. Council was
provided with an Additional Materials Memo regarding a proposed added Condition to the Environmental Study
Parts II and III for SUBTPM19637, located at the northwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road.
Included are recommended California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) additional Mitigation to the final
Environmental Study Part II [Revised page 18 of the Initial Study Part II (P112)], and the mitigation Monitoring
Checklist Part III [Revised Mitigation Monitoring Checklist Part III (P146)].
Mayor Michael opened the Public Hearing.
Public Comment:
N1. Walt Mitchell with Lewis Retail Centers, the Applicant, concisely reviewed the project and indicted he
was available for any questions.
N2. Natasha Walton, resident of Upland, a wildlife biologist at Chaffey Community College demonstrated
concerns for the plant life in the habitat at the project site.
N3. John Lyons spoke about Stater Brothers market slated for the site.
Mayor Michael closed the Public Hearing.
Council discussion followed.
MOTION: Moved by Council Member Alexander, seconded by Council Member Kennedy, to adopt Resolution No.
15 -211. Motion carried 5 -0.
MOTION: Moved by Council Member Williams, seconded by Council Member Alexander, to introduce Ordinance
No. 882, waive full reading, and hear the Ordinance by Title only.
Linda Troyan, City Clerk Services Director, read the title of Ordinance No. 882.
VOTES NOW CAST ON MOTION: Moved by Council Member Williams, seconded by Council Member
Alexander, to introduce Ordinance No. 882, waive full reading, and hear the Ordinance by Title only. Motion
carried 5 -0.
IF-- O. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM
01. Consideration of actions related to the continued fiscal stewardship of the City's West -Side Parks,
Landscape, and Street Lightings District.
* D R A F T*
December 2, 2015 1 Special City Council Meeting (6PM) I Fire Protection District, Successor Agency,
Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings (7PM) Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 6 of 10
John Gillison, City Manager, introduced Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager, Economic /Community Development
who gave the Staff Report via a PowerPoint presentation. Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager, Administrative
Services; Nettie Nielsen, Community Services Director; and Bill Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director were in
attendance to provide further information.
Staff Recommendations:
(1) Approve one time General Fund contribution of $40,000 to install credit card activated
controls on ball field lights citywide.
(2) Direct staff to prepare a resolution for FY 16/17 creating a $6 per hour lighting charge for all
fields, courts and arenas to cover electricity, maintenance, and capital replacement costs.
(3) Direct staff to discontinue $5 voluntary contribution by youth sports groups effective FY16/17.
(4) Approve a one -time $260,000 General Fund Capital Reserves expense to separate electrical
meters and circuits at Red Hill Park to reduce usage rates.
(5) Approve a one -time expense of General Fund Capital Reserves in the amount of $14,650 to
fund solar feasibility analysis at 4 parks.
(6) Direct staff to solicit bids for contract maintenance for PD 85 and rebid LIVID 1 maintenance
contract, all to include alternative for contract sports field maintenance to assist volunteers
and youth sports groups.
(7) Direct staff to proceed with agenda item to authorize bidding of Los Amigos Park construction
and seek partnerships with Cucamonga School District, CVWD and others to support the
annual maintenance. A final report to be presented to the City Council in February 2016.
(8) Direct staff to move forward with proposed FY16/17 budget including line items for
emergency repair and capital replacement reserves.
Mayor Michael opened the public comment period of the Administrative Hearing.
Public Comment:
01. Aristides Ruiz, resident and AYSO Soccer Region 65 volunteer, said that he is happy with the work the
City is proposing regarding lighting at the fields since Measure A did not pass. He noted concern about
the poor condition of the fields the children play on, specifically, Beryl and Church parks. Mr. Ruiz
suggested use of towers or tanks to capture water for field irrigation as an alternative or temporary
solution until a reclaimed water infrastructure is in place.
02. Matthew Sheasby, AYSO local Regional Commissioner, stated 4,000 children from the City participate
in the program every year. He pointed out reasons why a credit card reader or card swipe system for
the lights would be difficult to facilitate for the AYSO organization. He urged continuing the existing
system, and recommended other organizations which currently do not make a fair contribution, be
urged to do so. Mr. Sheasby also shared his concerns about field conditions and the necessary
maintenance needed to restore them.
03. Colin Lyon, AYSO, thanked and commended staff on a thorough report which included creative
solutions such as the installation of separate meters at Red Hill Park, cell towers to help generate
revenue, and the dual use of solar panels. Mr. Lyon also voiced concern for field reconditioning, and
asked if immediate attention could be given to the soccer fields.
04. John Lyons recalled volunteers helping with the fields.
Mayor Michael closed the public comment period.
Council discussion followed.
City Manager Gillison assured City Council that sports groups would be conferred with regarding proposed
changes, and noted that changes pertaining to fees require a Public Hearing.
MOTION: Moved by Council Member Williams, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Spagnolo, to approve Staff's
recommendations. Motion carried 4 -1 with Council Member Alexander opposed to moving forward at this time.
* D R A F T*
December 2, 2015 1 Special City Council Meeting (6PM) I Fire Protection District, Successor Agency,
Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings (7PM) Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 7 of 10
Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager, Economic /Community Development continued his report speaking on Red Hill
Park Lake.
Mayor Michael opened the public comment period of the Administrative Hearing.
There was no comment from the public.
Mayor Michael closed the public comment period.
Council discussion followed.
MOTION: Moved by Council Member Alexander, seconded by Council Member Williams, to direct Staff to move
forward with the bid process regarding Red Hill Park Lake. Motion carried 5 -0.
P. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
CITY COUNCIL
P1. Consideration of First Reading of Ordinance No. 883 Adding Chapter 2.14 to the Municipal Code
relating to Electronic and Paperless Filing of Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) Campaign
Disclosure Statements.
ORDINANCE NO. 883 (FIRST READING)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 2.14 TO THE MUNICIPAL
CODE RELATING TO ELECTRONIC AND PAPERLESS FILING OF FAIR
POLITICAL PRACTICES COMMISSION (FPPC) CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE
STATEMENTS.
John Gillison, City Manager, introduced Linda Troyan, City Clerk Services Director, who gave the Staff Report via
a PowerPoint presentation.
MOTION: Moved by Council Member Kennedy, seconded by Council Member Williams, to introduce Ordinance
No. 883, waive full reading, and hear the Ordinance by Title only.
Linda Troyan, City Clerk Services Director, read the title of Ordinance No. 883.
VOTES NOW CAST ON MOTION: Moved by Council Member Kennedy, seconded by Council Member Williams,
to introduce Ordinance No. 883, waive full reading, and hear the Ordinance by Title only. Motion carried 5 -0.
P2. November 3, 2015 Special Election Results and Associated Costs.
RESOLUTION NO. 15 -212
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE FACT OF THE SPECIAL
MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD IN THE WEST -SIDE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS
AND STREET LIGHTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1 OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ON NOVEMBER 3, 2015, DECLARING THE
RESULTS AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY PROVISION OF
LAW.
John Gillison, City Manager, directed Council to the Staff Report prepared by Linda Troyan, City Clerk Services
Director, regarding the November 3, 3015 Special Election results and associated costs.
MOTION: Moved by Mayor Pro Tern Spagnolo, seconded by Council Member Kennedy, to adopt Resolution No.
15 -212. Motion carried 5 -0.
* D R A F T*
December 2, 2015 1 Special City Council Meeting (6PM) I Fire Protection District, Successor Agency,
Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings (7PM) Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 8 of 10
Q. COUNCIL BUSINESS
Q1. Consideration of the City Council Community Services Subcommittee's recommendation regarding
Appointment(s) to the Park and Recreation Commission.
Mayor Michael reported that he and Mayor Pro Tern Spagnolo, as Members of the City Council Community
Services Subcommittee, met and considered candidates from the recruitment process for the Park and Recreation
Commission. The Subcommittee recommended the appointment of Mr. Peter Villegas to fill a four -year term due
to the resignation of Commissioner Jim Hansen.
MOTION: Moved by Council Member Kennedy, seconded by Council Member Williams, to approve appointment
of Peter Villegas to Park and Recreation Commission. Motion carried 5 -0.
Q2. Consideration of the City Council Community Services Subcommittee's recommendation regarding re-
appointments to the Community & Arts Foundation's Board of Directors.
Mayor Pro Tern Spagnolo reported that he and Mayor Michael, as Members of the City Council Community
Services Subcommittee, met and considered letters from Members Linda Bryan and Tina Chen requesting
reappointment to the Foundation's Board of Directors. Due to their diligent service and work for the Foundation,
the Subcommittee recommended reappointment of Linda Bryan and Tina Chen to serve additional four -year terms
on the Community & Arts Foundation's Board of Directors.
MOTION: Moved by Council Member Williams, seconded by Council Member Kennedy, to approve reappointment
of Linda Bryan and Tina Chen to the Community & Arts Foundation's Board of Directors. Motion carried 5 -0.
Q3. Consideration of approval of a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, amending Resolution 13 -079 to add Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda)
to the purview of the Citizens' Oversight Committee and amend certain other items.
RESOLUTION NO. 15 -209
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION 13 -079 TO ADD
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA) TO THE
PURVIEW OF THE CITIZENS' OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE AND AMEND CERTAIN
OTHER ITEMS.
Mayor Michael referred to Council Member Kennedy who moved for approval of Item. Q3.
MOTION: Moved by Council Member Kennedy, seconded by Council Member Williams, to adopt Resolution No.
15 -209, amending Resolution No. 13 -079 to add Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) to the
purview of the Citizens' Oversight Committee and amend certain other items. Motion carried 5 -0.
Q4. INTER - AGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that
were attended.)
There were no Inter - Agency Updates.
Q5. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.)
There were no Council Announcements.
* D R A F T*
December 2, 2015 1 Special City Council Meeting (6PM) I Fire Protection District, Successor Agency,
Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings (7PM) Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 9 of 10
R. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
Mayor Pro Tern Spagnolo requested consideration of lowering the Metrolink parking meter -fee for city residents.
Council Member Williams suggested including itemized estimates for improvements. Council Member Kennedy
asked to include a comparison of the actual fees generated to the original anticipated fees, as well as a projection
of future sustainable costs as over -all maintenance costs increase.
S. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 9:13 p.m. in memory of those who lost their lives during an active shooter incident which
unfolded earlier in the day in the community of San Bernardino at the Inland Regional Center.
Approved: * * * * *
Respectfully submitted,
Linda A. Troyan, MMC
City Clerk Services Director
* D R A F T*
December 2, 2015 1 Special City Council Meeting (6PM) I Fire Protection District, Successor Agency,
Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings (7PM) Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 10 of 10
"ANC HO
CAMONGA
ALIFORNIA
Proclamation
WHEREAS, Rancho Cucamonga Enterprise Geographic information
Svstems Connect (REGIS Connect) or the City of Rancho Cucamonga has entered
into a Professional Services Agreement with The Town of Yountville located in the
County of Napa for GIS shared services; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Yountville is the first customer for REGIS
Connect having signed the agreement on February 19, 2014 and still remains in
effect: and
WHEREAS, REGIS Connect has completed the first phase of the GIS
implementation and progressed to the second phase vi hick was the design and
development of' a mobile app for residents and visitors to encourage more
involvement in the community that they love; and
WHEREAS, this App was entered into the 2015 International Cit} -- 'Count},
Management .Association (ICMA) App Challenge Competition; and
WHEREAS, on October 28, 2015 the Town of Yountville was awarded 2 "`'
place, for their My Ville App.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED, that the City Council of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby congratulate the Town of
Yountville on this very prestigious recognition and also expresses their
appreciation for being the first entity to partner with REGIS Connect and lead
the way for others to follow.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California, have hereunto set their hand and caused the seal of'the
01.1, of Rancho Cucamonga to be affixed this 16 "' day of'Deceinber, 2015.
Dennis Michae
Mayor
Sam Spa of William J. AI ander
Mayor Pro Te Council ember
Lynne . Kennedy Diane Williams
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AND
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Agenda Check Register,
11/23/20 15 through 12/8/2015
Check No, Check Date Vendor Name Cite Tire Amount
All
00005638
1 1/2312015
AHUMADA. ALEXANDER R
0.00
904.08
904.08
AP
00007639
1 1123`2015
Al MAND, LLOYD
0.00
615.52
615.52
All
00005640
11,123/2015
BANTAU, VICTORIA
0.00
949.95
949.95
All
00005641
11/23/2015
BAZAL. SUSAN
0.00
969.50
969.50
All
00005642
1 1/2312015
BELL, MICIIAEL L.
0.00
1.560.49
1,560.49
All
00005643
11/23/2015
BERRY. DAVID
0.00
920.36
920.36
AP
00005644
1112312015
BROCK, ROBIN
0.00
893.87
893.87
All
00005645
1 112312015
CAMPBELL, GERALD
0.00
1,233.07
1,23107
All
00005646
11/2 3/2) 0 15
CARNES, KENNETH
0.00
469.02
469.02
AP
00005647
111/23/2015
CLABBY, RICHARD
0.00
920.36
920.36
All
00005648
11/23/2015
CORCORAN, ROBERT
0.00
525.11
525.11
All
00005649
11/23/2015
COX, KARL
0.00
615.52
615.52
All
00005650
11/23/2015
CRANE, RALPH
0.00
969.50
969.50
All
00005651
11/23/2015
CROSSLAND, WILBUR
0.00
469.02
469.02
All
00005652
11/23/2015
DAGUE, JAMES
0.00
1,172.22
1.172.22
AP
00005653
1112312015
DE ANTONIO, SUSAN
0.00
525.11
525.11
All
00005654
1 1/2312015
DEANS, JACKIE
0.00
600.74
600.74
All
00005655
1 1/23/2015
DOMINICK, SAMUEL A.
0.00
893.87
893.87
AP
00005656
11123%2015
EAGLFSON. MICHAEL
0.00
L17122
1,172.22
All
00005657
11/2312015
FRITCHEY -101 IN D.
0.00
469.02
469.02
AP
00005658
11/23/2015
1IEYDE, DONALD
0.00
1,172.22
1.17'_.22
All
00005659
11/231/2015
IN'ITRI ICCl -IIA. ROSALYN
0.00
1.208.82
1,208.82
A['
00005660
11/2312015
KILMFR, STEPHEN
0.00
1,233.07
1.233.07
All
00005661
11123/2015
LANE. WILLIAM
0.00
1.560.49
1,560.49
AP
00005662
11/23/2015
LEL.AL LAN .1.
0.00
1,066.80
1,066.80
AP
00005663
11/23/2015
LENZE. PAUL E
0.00
1,224,46
1,224.46
All
00005664
11/23/2015
LONGO, JOE
0.00
173.51
173.51
All
00005665
1 1/23/2015
LUTTRULL. DARRELL
0.00
694.69
694.69
All
00005666
11/23/2015
MACKALL, BENJAMIN
0.00
1,215.87
1,215.87
Al'
00005667
11/23%2015
MAYFIEL.D, RON
0.00
1,323.48
1,323.48
All
00005668
1 1/23/2015
MCKEE. JOHN
0.00
615.52
615.52
AP
00005669
1 1,2312015
MCNEIL, KLNNETII
0.00
615.52
615.52
AP
00005670
11/23/2015
MICHAEL. L. DENNIS
0.00
893.87
893.87
All
00005671
11/23/2015
MORGAN. BYRON
0.00
2.277.23
2.27723
All
00005672
11/23/2015
MYSKOW, DENNIS
0.00
920.36
92036
AP
00005673
1 li23/2015
NAUMAN, MICHAEL
0.00
920.36
920.36
All
00005674
11/2312015
NEE. RON
0.00
1,757.12
1,757.12
All
00005675
11/23 /2015
NELSON, MARY JANE
0.00
173.51
173.51
All
00005676
11/2312015
PLOUNG.MICHAELJ
0.00
556.94
556.94
AP
00005677
11/23/2015
POST_ N11CHAEL R
0.00
1,577.31
1,577.31
All
00005678
11/23/2015
PROULX, PATRICK
0.00
1,560.49
1,560.49
AP
00005679
1 11231120 15
ROEDER.JEI=F
0.00
1,172.22
1,172.22
All
00005680
11/23/2015
SALISBURY.`FHOMAS
0.00
615.52
615.52
AP
00005681
11/2312015
SM11,11, RONALD
0.00
920.36
920.36
AP
00005682
1 1/23;2015
SPAGNOLO. SAM
0.00
469.02
469.02
AP
00005683
11/23/2015
SPAIN, WILLIAM
0.00
694.69
694.69
Al'
00005684
11/23/2015
SULLIVAN, JAMES
0.00
753.31
753.31
P1
User: `4f LOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: I Current Date: 12/09/2015
Report; CK AGENDA _REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 14:57:12
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AND
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Agenda Check Register
1 1,'23,`2015 through 121812015
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Citv Fire Amount
AP
00005685
11/23/2015
TAYLOR, STEVE
0.00
1,224.46
1,224.46
AP
00005686
1112312015
TULEY,TERRY
0.00
1,172.22
L17122
All
00005687
1112312015
VANDERKALLEN, FRANCIS
000
904,08
904.08
AP
00005688
11,;23,'2015
WALTON. KEVIN
0.00
1,233.07
1,233.07
AP
00005689
1112312015
YOWI-1 I,. TIMOTHY A
0.00
1,323.48
1,323.48
AP
00005690
11125112015
CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA /RANCHO CUCAMONGA
9,845.00
0.00
9,845.00
AP
00005691
11/2512015
141) PRODUCTIONS LLC
10,000.00
0.00
10.000.00
AP
00005692
11/25/2015
RCCEA
1,353.00
0.00
1,353.00
AP
00005693
11/25/2015
RCPFA
10,542.95
0.00
10,54295
AP
00005694
11/25 /2015
SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT
2,601,627.16
0.00
1601,627.16
AP
00005695
11/2512015
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC POWER AUTHORITY
901.20
0.00
901.20
AP
00005696
11/25/2015
VIASYN INC
1,665.00
0.00
1,665.00
All
00005697
12!02/2015
FORTISTAR METHANE GROUP LLC
106,496.03
0.00
106,496.03
All
00364109
1 1/23!2015
CURATAL0, JAMES
0.00
1,560.49
1,560.49
All
003641 10
11/231/2015
LONCAR, PHILIP
0.00
920.36
920.36
All
003641 1 1
1112312015
TOWNSEND. JAMES
0.00
1,560.49
1,560A9
All
00364112
11/2312015
WALKER, KENNETII
0.00
246.76
246.76
AP
003641 13
11/25/2015
A'JONTUE, ROSE ANN
336.00
0.00
336.00
All
003641 14
11/25/2015
ACCELA INC
7,207.55
0.00
7,207.55
All
003641 115
111,125/2015
AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE
79.40
0.00
79.40
AP
0036-1116
1 1/25/2015
AGILINE LLC
700.00
0.00
700.00
,\P
00364117
1 1125,2015
ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC.
21,378.04
0.00
21,378.04
AP
00364118
1 1125 /2015
ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC,
285.00
0.00
285.00
AP
00364119
1 1/25 %2015
AI;hA LOMA COMMUNITY BAPTIST CHURCH
90.00
0.00
90.00
AP
0036 -1120
11;2512015
AROCI10, At MA
765.00
0.00
765.00
AP
00364121
1 1252015
ASS(S IANCI. f //.AGUE OF FOOTHILL COMMUNITIIIS
2,148.00
0.00
1148.00
AP
00364122
11!25112015
AVAN °FS, MARG1:
225.00
0.00
225.00
AP
00364 123
111/25112015
110 UCHPR. No I 3
500.00
0.00
500.00
AP
00364124
11/25.2015
C& R FARMS
36.00
0.00
36.00
AP
00364125
1 U25/2015
CALIFORNIA FRANCIIISETAX BOARD
200.00
0.00
200.00
AP
00364126
1 1/25,2015
CALIFORNIA FRANC/ IISE TAX BOARD
300.00
0.00
300.00
AP
00364127
1 1/25 /2015
CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
1,048.11
0.00
1,048.11
All
00364128
1 1/25/2015
CARTY. DIANE
491.40
0.00
491.40
All
00364129
1//2512015
CIRIACKS, VALERIE ANN
120.00
0.00
120.00
AI'
00364130
11/25/2015
CLARK, KAREN
1,251.00
0.00
1,251.00
All
00364131
11125/2015
CLEARWATER GRAPHICS INC
27,335.54
0.00
27,335.54
AP
00364132
11/25/2015
CLEARWATER GRAPI TICS INC
48.14
0.00
48.14
AP
00364133
111/25/2015
COMP U ZONE
357.60
0.00
357.60
All
00364134
1 112512015
COUTURE, FRANCOIS- PIERRE
833.00
0.00
833.00
AP
00364135
11/25/2015
CPRS
165.00
0.00
165.00
AP
00364136
1 1%25/2015
DANCE TERRIFIC
2,009.00
0.00
2,009.00
All
003641 37
11/251/2015
DEAN, ADAM
135.00
0.00
135.00
AP
00364138
1 1;251'_015
DOLLARFIIDE, GINGER
156.00
0.00
156.00
AP
00364139
11125/2015
DUNK ANN MARIE
1,27620
0.00
1,276.'-_0
All
003641-10
1 1 ?2512015
EAS 1ERLING. RAY
249.60
0.00
249.60
:1P
00364141
11'25%2015
ERICKSON HALL CONSTRUCTION
0.00
19,125.00
19,125.00
At'
00364142
1 125 /2015
FELICIANO, ANTHONY
144.00
0.00
144.00
iya
User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 2 Current Date: 12/09/2015
T2eport. CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait t Time: 14:57:12
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P3
AND
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Agenda Check Rellistei
11/23/2015 through 1218/2015
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City 1, ire Amount
AP
00364143
11/2512015
FIESTA PARADE FLOATS
7,530.00
0.00
7,530.00
AI'
00364144
11!2512015
FOUR POINTS BY SHERATON
489.12
0.00
489,12
AI'
00364145
11/2512015
G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS
104.66
0.00
104.66
AI'
00364146
11/25/2015
GILBEIRT. VELMA
275.00
0.00
275.00
AP
00364147
1 1 `25'0015
GIORDANO. MARIANNA
14.40
0.00
14.40
AP
0036 -1148
1 1/25 /2015
GOLDEN STATE RISK MANAGEMENT AU 'FIiORITY
105,279.00
1,150.00
106,429.00 * **
AI'
00' 64 1-19
11;25'2015
GRAINGER
6,53
0.00
6,53
AP
00364150
11/2512015
GRAPHICS FACTORY INC.
468.50
0,00
`168.50
AP
00364151
11;2512015
1IAMILTON, MONIQUF
960.00
0.00
960.00
All
00364152
1 1/25/2015
HAMPTON YOGA
648.00
0.00
648.00
AP
00364153
1 1%25/2015
1IERITAGE EDUCATION GROUP
20.00
0.00
20.00
All
00364154
11/25;2015
HILI:S PETNUTRITION
428.54
0.00
428.54
AP
00364155
11/25/12015
IATSE NATIONAL HEALTI I & WELFARE FUNDS
900.00
0.00
900.00
All
00364156
l 1/25/2015
IDEXX DISTRIBUTION INC
1,711.25
0.00
1,71125
AP
00364157
11/25/2015
INLAND EMPIRE "FOURS AND TRANSPORTATION
1,070.50
0.00
1,070.50
AP
00364158
11/2512015
INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION BOARD
1,35095
0.00
1,350.95
AI'
00364159
1 1/25/2015
INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES
73.05
0.00
73.05
AP
00364160
111/25/2015
INLAND VALLEY EMERGENCY PET CLINIC
215.00
0.00
215.00
AP
00364161
1 ]/2 5 0 15
J AND S S IRIPING CO INC
2.630.54
0.00
2,630.54
All
00364162
111/25/2015
JACOBSEN DIVISION OF TEXTRON INC
254.85
0.00
254.85
AP
00364163
11/25 /2015
JOBS AVAILABLE INC
45.00
0.00
45.00
Al'
00364164
1 1/25/2015
JONES, CHRISTINA FIAATAINEN
833.00
0.00
833.00
AP
00364165
11/25/2015
K K WOODWORKING
21.58
0.00
21.58
Al'
00364166
1 1/25/2015
L S A ASSOCIATES INC
0.00
389,16
389.16
AP
00361167
11/25/2015
LANCE SOLI, AND LUNGFIARD
4,780.00
0.00
1,780.00
AP
0036 -1168
1 1/252015
LAWSON PRODUCTS INC
0.00
433.99
433.99
A1'
0004169
1 1- 25'2015
LLAGi11? OF CALIFORNIA CITIES
280.00
0.00
280.00
AP
0036 =1170
1 l7/_ 5/201 5
I.EWIS 1NV1 STMFNT COMPANY L.LC
180,930.97
0.00
180,930.97
AP
0030.1171
11 25/2015
1.ICII' I'M AN. 0FER
0.00
261.00
261.00
All
00364172
1 125/2015
LIl TI,i. BF,AR PRODUCTIONS
4,400.00
0.00
4,400.00
AP
00364173
1 125/2015
LUBRICATION ENGINEERS INC
0.00
3 X19628
3,496.28
AP
00364174
1 12512015
MADRONE & ARROW I.I,C
10.60
0.00
10.60
AP
00364175
11;25'2015
MARK CIIRISTOPHERINC'
0.00
200.45
200.45
All
00364176
1 1`25/2015
MARSHALL, SYLVIA
1- 408.80
0.00
1,408.80
AP
00364177
11125/2015
MARTINFZTOWING
45.00
0.00
45.00
AP
00364178
1 1/25;2015
MARY S ROBERTS SPAY/NL'UTER CLINIC
100.00
0.00
100.00
AP
0036417/ 9
11/251/2015
MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY
24427
0.00
244.27
AP
00364180
1 1,25112015
MICI IAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL INC
21.377.50
0.00
21.377.50
AP
00364181
1 1/25/2015
MIDWEST TAPE
609.73
0.00
609.73
AP
00364182
11/2512015
MIJAC ALARM COMPANY
190.00
0.00
190.00
AP
00364183
11/25/2015
MISSION REPROGRAPHICS
566.42
0.00
566.42
AP
00364184
1 1/25/2015
MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC US INC
638.2 -1
0.00
638.24
All
00364185
11/25/2015
MK AUTO DE FAIL INC
0.00
225.00
225.00
AP
00364186
11,25/2015
MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL, ENG REPAIR
5188
0.00
52.88
All
00364187
11/25/201-5
MSA INLAND EMPIRE. /DESERT CLIALITER
240.00
0.00
240,00
Al'
00364188
11/2512015
N F P A
0.00
175.00
175.00
AP
00164189
11/25;2015
NAIOP
700.00
0.00
700.00
User: A'LOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 3 Current Date, 12/09/2015
Report: CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 14:57:12
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P4
AND
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
AV,enda Check RelZister
1 1/23/20 15 through 12/8120 15
Check No.
Check Date
Vendor Name
City
Fire Amount
AP
00364190
11/25/2015
NAPA AUTO PARTS
20.39
0.00
20.39
AP
00364191
1 1/25 {2015
NATIONAL DATA & SURVEYING SERVICES
192.00
0.00
19100
All
00364192
t 1125/2015
NEOPOST USA INC
122.26
0.00
122.26
AP
00364193
1 1/25;2015
NEW IMAGE COMMERCIAL FLOORING
0.00
4,496.78
4,496.78
AP
00364194
111/251,12015
NORSTAR INDUSTRIES
543.31
0.00
543.31
AP
00364195
1 1/25/2015
NOTARO, JEFF
39.77
0.00
39.77
All
00364196
1 1/25 /2015
0 ENTERTAINMENT
2,127.00
0.00
2,127.00
AP
00364197
1 1;25/2015
013RIEN. TF10MAS
0.00
261.00
261.00
A1'
00364198
1 1/25//2015
O'DONNELL BATTERIES
1,705.00
0.00
1,705.00
AP
00364199
11/25;2015
OFFICF, DEPOT
6344.56
0.00
6,344.56
AP
00364200
1 1/25/2015
OMNITRANS
1176,58
0.00
1176. 58
AP
00364201
111251/2015
ONTARIO WINNELSON CO
42836
0.00
428.36
A1'
00364202
11/25/2015
ONTRAC
147.34
0.00
147.34
All
00364203
11/25/2015
OPARC
396.00
0.00
396.00
All
00364204
11/25;2015
ORUNA, PATRICIA
1,620.00
0.00
1.620.00
AP
00364205
11/25/2015
OTT, LAURA
549.00
0.00
549.00
;A1'
003114206
11/25/2015
OTT, SHARON
522.00
0.00
52100
AP
00364207
1 1/25/2015
PAI, CAMPAIGN
10.00
0.00
10.00
A1'
0036 -1208
11125/'2015
PARS
7,000.00
0.00
7000,00
AP
0036.1209
11/25/2015
PASMA
75.00
0.00
75.00
AP
00364210
11,12512015
PEREZ, ALEXANDRA
147.00
0.00
147.00
AP
0036421 1
11/25,12015
PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS
52.99
0.00
52.99
AP
0036LI212
1 1/25/2015
PIONEER MANUFACTURING
18186
0.00
183.86
Al'
00364213
1 1/25/2015
POLICE EXECUTIVE RESEARCH FORUM
200.00
0.00
200.00
All
0036421 -1
111/25/2015
POWER PLAY YOUTH ATHLETICS
1,024.00
0.00
1,024.00
AP
00361215
1 1/25/2015
PIL`-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC
96.59
0.00
96.59
AP
00364216
1 1,25/201>
PRO SPRAY 13QUIPMENT
8.66
0.00
8.66
AP
0036 =1217
1 1;25,,2015
PPZ0,lFC'T SISTER FAMILY SERVICES
703.18
0.00
70318
AP
0036.1218
1 1125!2015
RAINI`-Y. L.A I RLAC F�
410,00
0.00
410,00
AP
00364219
1 1 `25/2015
IZALPI I ANDFRSEN & ASSOCIATI S
11500.00
0.00
11500.00
AP
00364220
1 /25/2015
RAMIRLZ, GABRIFI, FUFNTI,,S
6098
0.00
60.98
Al'
0036 -1221
1 1;_'5`2015
RANCI10 CUCAMONGA CIfAMBI R OF COMMER('(=
3.16( 66
0.00
3.166.66
All
00364222
1 1`25 %2015
RANCTIO (1 ICAMONGA FONTANA FAMILY YMCA
7160.40
0.00
7160.40
AP
0036 -1223
1 1,252015
1:ANC`l10 REGIONAL VETERINARY I IOSPTTAt, INC
675.00
0.00
675.00
All
00364224
1 1r -25/2015
R.ANCt10 REGIONAL VETERINARY IfOSPIT"AL INC'
474.81
0.00
474.81
AP
0036-1225
l 1r ?5 /2015
RIGELMAN FNCARNACION ONTIVEIZOS
60.00
0.00
60.00
Al'
00364226
11,25 2015
1110"1 I, MICHLLIT
300.00
0.00
300,00
All
00364227
1 If25 /2015
SAFEWAY SIGN COMPANY
2.176.09
0,00
2.17609
AP
00364228
1 1'25/2015
SAN ANTONIO HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
3,716.00
0,00
3,716.00
All
00364229
11/25 %2015
SAN BFRNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS Dl/P "I'
242.28
0.00
24228
At'
00364230
1 1,25/2015
SAN BFRNARDINO. CITY" OF
1,011.82
0.00
1,011,82
All
00364231
11 25/2015
SARGENT TOWN PLANNING INC
179,279M9
0.00
179,279.09
11'
00364232
11 25 /2015
Sl3PEA
1.043.54
0.00
1,043.54
All
00364233
11/25/2015
SC FUELS
18,092.42
5,81730
23,909.72 * **
All
00364234
1 1/25/2015
SENECIIAL, CALVIN
445.20
0.00
445,20
All
00364235
11/25/2015
SEXTON, SHEILA
5.00
0.00
5.00
All
00363236
1 1;25/2015
SI-IFR1FFS COURT SERVICES
296.59
0.00
296.59
User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 4
Current Date:
12/09/2015
Report. CK
AGiENDA,
REG PORTRAIT
CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register
Portrait 1
Time:
14:57:12
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
P5
AND
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Agenda Check Register
11%23/2015 through 12,18,/2015
Check No.
Check Date
Vendor Name
City
Fire Amount
All
00364237
1 1/2512015
SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES
93.38
0.00
93.38
All
()0364238
1 1'25'2015
SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES
200.00
0.00
200.00
All
00364239
1 1/25`2015
SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC
45,412.57
0.00
45,412.57
All
00364240
1 1/252015
SMITI1. JAYMI LEE
833.00
0.00
83100
AP
00364241
11/251/2015
SO CAI, SANDBAGS
3,240.00
0.00
3,240.00
AP
00364242
11/25/2015
SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
20.36
449.74
470.10 * **
AP
00364243
1 1'2512015
SOUI'1IERN CALIF FLEET SERVICES INC
0.00
1,869.35
1,869.35
AP
00364245
1 112512015
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
12,939.60
0.00
11939.60
All
00364246
11 %25'/2015
ST GEORGE GROUPE INC
3,873.67
0.00
3,873.67
AP
00364247
11/25!2015
STOTZ EQUIPMENT
158.59
0.00
158.59
AP
003642 -18
111/25,12015
SUNGARL) Pt.IBL IC SECTOR USER GROUP ASSOC' INC
195.00
0.00
195.00
iP
00364249
1 1/25x'2015
TERIZA VISTA ANIMAL I IOSPITAL
50.00
0.00
50.00
AP
00364250
1 1/25/2015
TI IF COUNSELING TEAM INTERNATIONAL
0.00
600.00
600.00
All
00364251
1 1;251/2015
T'RACEY, VAL
375.00
0.00
375.00
AP
00364252
11!25/2015
TRAK ENGINEERING INC:
2,381.45
0.09
2381.45
AP
00 64253
1 1/25/2015
UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC
20,882.00
0.00
20.882.00
AP
00364254
1 1/252015
UN IT11) ROTARY BRUSII CORPORATION
687.69
0.00
687.69
AP
00364255
1 1 25;2015
[`Ni LLD SCENI(: AR LISTS PENSION AND WFLF'AIZE i'1/
600.00
0.00
600.00
AP
06164256
1 1,252015
UNITH) SITE S1- 'RVI('ES OF CA INC
225.91
0.00
225.91
AI'
00364257
11//25/2015
UNI'l I'1) WAY
157.00
0.00
157.00
AP
00364258
11 %25;2015
['PS
32L69
0.0O
321.69
AP
0036 -1259
11 2512015
UhII,IQUE;S'1`
814.90
0.00
81 -1.90
AP
00364260
1 1'25/2015
VC:A CEN'LRA1, ANIMAL HOSPITAL.
50.97
0.00
5097
AP
00364261
1 1'_5/2015
VECCI110. TOM
22 9. 00
0.00
229.00
All
003611262
1 1 /25/2015
VICTOR MEDICAL, COMPANY
164.47
0.00
164.47
AP
00364263
11/25/2015
VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL
325.00
0.00
325.00
AP
00364264
1 1%25/2015
VISION COMMUNICATIONS CO
360.00
0.00
360.00
AP
0036-1265
11/25/2015
VORTEX INDUSTRIES INC
0.00
1,041.90
1,041.90
AP
00364266
11/251-)015
WAFII; SANITARY SUPPLY
2,949.87
1,818.12
4,767.99 * **
AP
0036.12167
1 1/25/2015
WI -S "1 RUX IN "FERNA "I'IONAl. INC
0.00
122.50
122.50
AP
00364368
1 1,2512015
WR1CH IT. CI IRIS
42.59
0.00
42.59
,1P
0<0364271
1 1/25/2015
XEROX CORPORATION
9,891.45
438.58
10330.03 * **
�P
11036,1272
1 1 25`2015
XL STORAGk
895.00
0.00
895.00
AP
00364273
11 25 2015
ZFF MEDICAL INC
753.70
0.00
753.70
All
0036427 -1
1 112512015
/FP MANUFAC "I URING COMPANY
0.00
209.93
209.93
Al'
00 6 -1275
1 /,25/2015
ABC LOCKSMITHS
9 17. 62
0.00
917.62
AP
0036.1276
1125`2015
AIRGAS LISA I.LC'
359.86
0.00
359.86
AI'
00.50 -1278
1 1;25/2015
C.` V W D
22,301.68
1.595.96
2.5.897.64 * **
All
130364279
11'25'/2015
CAI SFNSF.
2.640.12
0.00
2,640.12
+:I
0036-128 %)
1 1 25;2015
CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC
0.00
1.060.35
1.06%0.35
All
00364281
1 1,2512015
DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION
1,089.73
0.00
1,089.73
AP
006-1282
1 1,22512015
EMCOR SERVICI
25.529.18
0.00
25,529.18
AP
00364283
11:25/2015
SWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS
762.23
0.00
762.23
AP
00364284
1 1,1/2512015
FASTENAL COMPANY
6.05
0.00
6.05
All
017364285
11'25/2015
1IOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC
12,840.11
0.00
12,840,11
All
00364286
1 1/25/2015
HYDRO SCAPE PRODUCTS IN C
3,270.66
0.00
3,270.66
All
00364287
1 1/25,'2015
IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC
2,408.93
0.00
2,408.93
_ -
User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA
LOPEZ Page: 5
Current Date;
12/09/2015
IZcport: CK
AGENDA
REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait
I
Time:
14:57:12
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P6
AND
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
A14enda Check Register
I 1 /23%2015 through 12/8'2015
Check No.
Check Date
Vendor Name
Cite
Tire
Arnount
All
00364288
l 1,/25%2015
1NTF.RSTA I'l" BA4 AERIES
0.00
458.18
158.18
All
00364289
1 1/2512015
KM I? FIRF APPARA'Tl1S
0.00
5/16,26
546.26
AP
00364290
11125;2015
LIMS At 10 INC
2,766.20
01.00
1766.20
AP
00364291
11/2512015
PENNY PLUMBING
855.67
0.00
855.67
A1''
00364292
12"02!2015
35 DI-ZIGNZ
216.00
0.00
216.00
AP
00364293
12,10212015
A AND R TIRE SERVICE
84,84
0.00
84.84
All
00364294
121/02!2015
A &V SOFTBALL.
7,938,00
0.00
7,938.00
All
00364295
12/02,•'2015
ACEY DECY EQl'IPMENT INC.
211.80
0.00
211.80
All
00364296
12/02/2015
ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL
350.00
0.00
350.00
All
00364297
12/021/2015
AESS
0.00
25.00
25.00
All
00364298
12102/2015
ALL C HFS TOOLS
0.00
25.00
25.00
All
00364299
12/02/2015
ALLIED STORAGE CONTAINERS
0.00
75.60
75.60
AP
00361300
12/02/2015
ALPIIAGRAPIIICS
22.68
0.00
2L68
AP
00364301
12/02/2015
ALTA LOMA ANIMAL I IOSPITAL
1,000.00
0.00
1.000.00
AP
00364302
1210212015
ALFA RANCHO PEI HOSPITAL
150.00
0.00
150.00
AP
00364303
12/02,'2015
ARCNIBALD PCT HOSPITAL
450.00
(MM
450.00
AP
00364304
12;0212015
ARCIIITE,RRA DESIGN GROUP
4,876.25
1,132.50
6,008.75 * **
AP
00364305
12:02,`2015
ARENAS, II Fl, I N
14.00
0.00
14.00
AP
00364306
12102"2015
ASKARZOL KHAN
7.98
0.00
7.98
AP
OW64307
12102`2015
At TBAU CORPORATION
36 „642.00
0,00
36.642.00
AP
0036 -4308
12'02`2(}15
At 1'10 AND RV SPFCIALIS`1'S INC.
03.81
0.00
93.81
AI'
0036 -1309
12%02,2015
AYAN IRA INC.
1496.00
1,536.00
4,032.00 * **
All
0036-1310
1-) 022015
BALL, ROB/ RT
0.00
32,92
3292
AP
00364311
12"022015
BARNIiAR 'l, BRIAN "THOMAS
1,500.00
0.00
1,500.00
AI'
00361312
120212015
BARRAGAN,MARCOS
0,00
261.00
261.00
AI'
00364313
12/02/2015
13ASI,I..INE ANIMAL HOSPITAL
900.00
0.00
900.00
AP
00364314
12/02/2015
BATTERY POWER INC
177.30
0.00
177.30
AP
00364315
12102/2015
BEMB1, ARMIDA
10200
0.00
102.00
All
00364316
12-` `02;2015
BMI' SOLUTIONS
4,690,00
0.00
4,690.00
,,NP
00364317
12102/2015
BROWN, 1ENNIPBR
15,00
0.00
15.00
AP
0036 -1318
12102r2015
CABLI :INC,
589.50
0.00
589.50
AP
0036 -1319
12;02/_2015
C'AI. S I`A`T[ SYFF SERVICE'S
3.378.50
0.00
3.378.50
AP
00364320
12;02/2015
CALM)
210.00
0.00
210.00
AP
00364321
12/0212015
CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY
59.67
0.00
59,67
AP
00364322
12'02%2015
CARQUIEST AUTO PARTS
0.00
741-15
741.15
AP
00364323
12;02/2015
CCS ORANGE COUNTY JANITORIAL INC.
0.00
1,120M
1,120.00
All
00364324
12,'0212015
CDW GOVERNMENT INC.
2,491.37
0.00
2,491.37
AP
00364325
12/02 =2015
CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALTIES
48.60
0.00
48.60
AP
00364326
12/02;2015
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS
0.00
818,53
818.53
P
00364327
12102;2015
CHINO M0WFR AND ENGINE SERVICE
0.00
31.30
31.30
All
00364328
11022015
CLARK SEIF CLARK INC.
0.00
2,358.40
2,358.40
AP
00364 329
12/02/2015
CLARKF PLUMBING SPECIALi'fES INC.
1,309.26
0.00
1.309.26
1N
00364.7;0
12:0? 2015
CLIMA TFC H -C
5.47 -1.75
0.00
5.47 4.75
AP
00364331
12!02'2015
CLINE. LAURA
300.00
0.00
300.00
M
003643:,2
12/02/2015
CONCEPT POWDER COATING
265,00
0.00
265.00
AP
00364333
12/02!2015
CONCEPTUAL SITE FURNISHINGS INC.
8,369.52
0.00
8,369.52
AP
00364334
12102;2015
CRIME SCENE STERI -CLEAN LLC
540.00
0.00
540.00
User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 6
Current Date:
12/09/2015
Report: CK
AGEN
DAR EG_PORTRAIT "CON SOLI DATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I
Time:
14:57:12
CITY OF IZANCI-10 CUCAMONGA
P7
AND
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE, PROTECTION
DISTRICT
Agenda Check Register
11/23/2015 through 12/8/2015
Check No.
Check Date
vendor Name
citv
Fire
Amount
AP
00364335
12/02'2015
CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES INC
25,02
0.00
'_5.02
At'
00364330
12/02'2015
1) & D 1) F R V I CF S INC.
1,290,00
0.00
1.290,00
AP
00')0,1337
12i02, 2015
1) AND K CONCRI"IT COMPANY
1.369.98
0.00
1,369.98
,\ 1)
00,64338
12'02/2015
DANII,'I,S TIRE SERVICE
0.00
5.409.79
5,409.79
Al'
00164339
/?'02/2015
DEM CO INC'
189.88
0.00
189.88
All
00364340
1 / � I
12!02 201 5
DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRF PROTECTION
DE
0.00
-156.96
456,96
All
0036-1341
12/02/2015 15
DIMV RENEWAL
0.00
25.00
25.00
AI'
00364342
12/02/2015
DOWNEY, JENNIFER
10.67
0.00
10,67
AP
00364343
12/02./2015
DUMBEJA, MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT, THE
0.00
300.00
300.00
All
00364344
12%02/2015
DI.JNN, ANN MARIE
96.60
0.00
96,60
AP
00364345
12/02/2015
FNVIRONN/IFNTAI, RECOVERY SERVICES INC.
1,93129
0,00
1,932.29
All
00364346
12!02/2015
FACTORY MOTOR PARTS
0.00
664.25
664.25
At)
003643471
12102;2015
FACTORY MOTOR PARTS
0.00
118.19
118.19
All
0036-1318
121/02120 15
FAIL SA FFITESTING
0.00
81.25
81.25
All
00364349
12/02/2015
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORI'
121.63
0.00
121.63
At'
00364350
12/0212015
FIRSTVETERINARY SIJPI'IY
2,016.52
0.00
2,016,52
All
00364351
12/02/2015
FLEET SERVICES INC.
0.00
249.50
249.50
Al'
00364352
12/0212015
FRED PRYOR SEIMINARS/CAREERTRACK,
299.00
0.00
299.00
AP
00364 3 5 3
12102, %2015
G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS
0,00
_1993.11
2.993.1 I
AP
00364354
12/0212015
G.T. FNGINFFRING
0,00
837,00
UTOO
AP
00364355
12 %02,2015
GA]TWAY ITT CTMFTFRY AND C'REMA'TORY
385M0
(M)o
385.00
Al
0036 -1356
1 ), 02201 5
(1ONS,\I,VFS AND SONJOFA
3.045.00
0.00
3.0-15.00
All
00364,',57
12,012015
GOOD YkAR'l IRE AND RUBBI:R CO,
945.13
0,00
915.13
AP
0036-1358
12'02 20I 5
GRAINGFR
723,07
685.61
1.408.68
Al'
0036 -1359
12 '02/20 15
GRAI)t ll(`S FACTORY INC.
I ,71 W70
000
1,780,70
AP
0030-1360
12,'0', 2015
GRAVES & KING LIT
271.33
0,00
271.33
All
00364161
12/0212015
ORAYBAR
832.57
0.00
832.57
AP
0036,1'6)
:1 -
121/02,1201
I -QUII)MENT
GREEN ROCK POWER 1,
745.15
0.00
745.15
Al'
00364,63
1210212015
GUTRRI-RO. ALIT'NA
425,00
0.00
425.00
AP
0036 136, 1
12
FIASCO INTERNATIONAL INC.
48.51
0.00
48.51
AP
00364365
12
1 IAWFI 10RNF LIFTSYS FFMS
1.029.20
(Wo
1,029.20
AP
0036 -1366
125021,20 1
1 IFNRIKSON OWTN & ASSOC INC.
4,600,00
0.00
1,600.00
A1'
00361367
12102/2015
11 FN R Y SCI I F IN ANIMAL I I E A LTI I SUPPLY LY
245.00
0,00
845.00
Al'
0036-1308
12/02//2015
I IF& I I CONSULTANTS LLC
3,1 15.00
0.00
3.1 15.00
All
0036,1369
12/02/2015
111 WAY SAFT I'Y INC
6.758.23
0000
6,759.21
AP
00361370
12%02,'2015
11ILL'S I)FTNUTRITION
3,847.53
0.00
3,847.53
All
00364371
12/02`2015
HILLS I)E_TNUTRITION SALES INC
3,424,79
0.00
3.424.79
All
003641372
11102,2015
1 IMC ARCHITECTS
0,00
65,069.72
65,069.72
AP
00364373
12/0212015
FIONGYAN, CH EN
2,369.60
110.00
2,479.60
AP
00364374
12/0212015
HOSE-' MAN INC
0.00
1.482.25
1,492.25
A1'
00364375
12102/2015
HOT ATHLETIC APPAREL, INC.
10,502.05
0.00
10-502,05
AP
00364376
12/0212015
1 IOYT LUMBER CO- SM
0.00
40.74
-10.74
AP
0036-1377
1 2,02!1 0 15
111111 ANT: SOCII-J)' OF SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY INI
400.00
0.00
400.00
1)
00364378
12102/2015
I I t,-!N HNG I'ON I I A R DWA R F
76137
0.00
76137
1)
00364379
121022015
IDIIXX DISTRIBUTION INC
3,493.04
0.00
3.493,04
At'
00304380
12/02/2015
INLAND PACIFIC BALLET
40.000.00
0,00
40,000.00
AP
00364381
12!02112015
INLAND VALLEY EMERGENCY PFTCLINIC'
94.50
0.00
84.50
User: VLOPEZ
-
VERONICA
LOPEZ Page: 7
Current Date:
12/09/2015
Report: C:
AGENDA
REG _PORTR A IT-ICON SOLI DATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait
I
Time:
14:57:12
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P8
AND
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Agenda Check Register
11/23/2015 through 12/8x12015
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City hire Amount
A P
00364382
121022015
1NT1R V ET IN
5,745.25
0.00
5;745.25
Al)
00364383
1202/2015
JAC(1UES, PAUL
1,800.00
0.00
1,800.00
�P
00364384
12/0212015
101INSON MALI IINFRY COMPANY
0.00
12,254.51
12?54.51
AP
00364385
12/012015
JONES AND MAYER, LAW OFFICES OP
1,024.00
0.00
1,024.00
All
00- 164386
12) 0212015
KF'1M. BREND1'N
40.00
0.00
40.00
Al'
0016 -1387
12.0212015
KONF INC
633.61
0.00
633.61
AP
00364388
121102 �2015
HFBFR F C'ASSIDY W1/ ll "LMOIZL
189830
_1094.50
5.992.80 * **
111
00364389
12!02/'_015
LI "I`TI.E 11EAR, PRODUCTIONS
895.00
0.00
895.00
AP
00364390
12r02/2015
MAIN ST'REL ";T SIGNS
543.02
0.00
543.02
AP
00364391
1210212015
NIANLEY. CARMINA
200.00
0.00
200.00
AP
00364392
121'02!2015
MARIPOSA LANDSCAPi S INC
9,287.84
35.06
9,322.90 * **
Al'
00364393
12!02/2015
MARY S ROBFR '1'S SPAY /NLUTER CLINIC
100.00
0.00
100.00
AP
00364394
12102/2015
MATERIAI_, SALES UNLIMITED
594.00
0.00
594.00
AP
00364395
12/02/2015
MCGILL, DAVID AND CARLA
15.00
0.00
15.00
AP
00304396
12/0212015
MCNIASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY
49994
0.00
499.94
Al'
00364397
12/02/2015
NIcROY, .!ANNA
500.00
0.00
500.00
AP
0036 -1398
1 2102x'2015
MD ENERGY INC
22,044,60
0.00
22,044.60
AY
00364399
12/02//2015
MFDINA_ 13REANNA
0.00
32191
322.91
AP
00364400
12/02/2015
NIFIAWASTE DISPOSAL, LLC
50.00
0.00
50.00
Al)
00364401
12/02!2015
MLINEKE CAR CARL CENTER
2,782.21
0.00
2,782.21
AP
00364402
12/02/2015
MILLEIZ, MELISSA K
17.28
0.00
17.28
AP
00364403
12/02/2015
MOI.INA, I)FBORA11
75.00
0.00
75.00
All
00.6 -1404
12'02/2015
A4OUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR
148.30
0.00
148.30
AP
00364405
12/021/2015
MULLEP.. VIVIAN
359.00
0.00
359.00
AP
00361 =106
1'2,,0-' ;2015
NENGEN
551.88
0.00
551.88
AP
0036-110"
12102;2015
NOVARTIS ANIMAI, I IFAI, FI I US INC
76.50
0.00
76.50
AP
00.164408
12/02/2015
0CCLIPATIONA1, 111SA1, H I ChRS OF CA
70.00
0.00
70.00
AP
00,6'1 =110
12- 02'2015
Ol'I`I(IL DEPOT
3,413.06
158.76
3.571.82 * **
AP
00304 -1 I1
1102'2015
ON I ARIO SPAY AND NFUTER INC
975.00
0.00
975.00
All
00364412
12;022015
ITRMACAM)
3.162.35
0.00
3,162.35
AP
0036 -1413
1201'2015
PERSONAL, BFS "I`
2,146.43
0.00
2,146.43
A1)
(103/14.114
12.02!2015
P1? I "1'S ROAD SFRVICI' INC
2.228.03
(1.)0
2,228:03
A1)
0036 -1 -115
12'02, 2015
PONIONA VALLEY VETERINARY IIOSPI`l "AL
25.00
0.00
25.00
-11'
0036 -1-116
12'`02/2015
PRO SHITS GROUP INC
1,467.40
0.00
1,467.40
AP
0036=1417
12/02/2015
R C EMPI.O`t F1; ACTiVITIFS COMMI T "TFE
17,000.00
0.00
17.000.00
AP
00364418
1 2!02/2015
RANCHO SMOG C1NTFIR
70.00
0.00
70.00
AP
003,64 -119
12102/2015
REGENCY EN ITIRPRISF.S INC
1.451.52
0.00
1.451.52
AP
00364 =120
12!02!2015
R ICI IARD IIEATFI AND ASSOCIATES
2.382.10
0.00
2,382.10
AP
00364421
12!0212015
R1CI IARDS WATSON AND GLRSFION
0.00
3.462.50
3,462.50
Al'
00364422
12/0212.015
ROBLES. RAUL P
80.00
0.00
80.00
All
00364423
12//02/2015
RODRIGUEZ INC, RY
1,435.35
0.00
1.435.35
Al)
00364424
12102/2015
SALLEY, BRET
0.00
36.31
36.31
AP
00364425
12/02/2015
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTERS
20.00
0.00
20.00
1P
00361 -1426
12/0212015
SCI 1001- DENISE
0.00
232.89
232.89
A1'
00364427
12/0'_12015
SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC
44.532.63
0.00
44.53163
AP
00,64.128
12'022015
SIGN SI101 1,111.
0.00
364.50
364.50
AP
00364429
12.02 ?2015
Sl FFONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC
3,519.41
0.00
3,519.41
User: V1.01IFY - VERONICA LOPEZ Pagc: 8 Current Date: 12/09/2015
12eport: CK AGFN',DA- REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 14:57:12
CITY OF RANCHO CNCAMONGA P9
AND
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
||/23/2D|5dhmu�il2��0|5
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name ciii Fire Amount
AP
0064430
12/02/20 15
8M&KTL[n �
150,00
0.00
150.00
AP
80364|71
12!02"2815
G0CAL|[G&8COMPANY
7.770.81
397.67
8.168.48 ***
All
00364132
12/02/2015
SOLAR CITY CORPORATION
IO2.825.31
19^947.14
222^77245 +*^
AP
00')644 13
1202/2015
SOUS,K48||GSx
277M
0.00
277M
AP
00364440
12$212015
SOU TU2Rm CALIFORNIA ED|UON
19^977.74
5,68921
25.006.95**�
A|`
00364441
|2N2/20|j
SOUlHCRN CALIFORNIA LAUNDRY COLLC
34J0224
0.00
3|.50224
Al'
0,036,1442
13@21,2815
SOUTB\AND SPORTS OFFICIALS
400.00
0.80
460V0
xP
0O3o4443
|2N2/2U|5
S0(/U|oV[3T�iO8|[ESTOK�6[i�C
3O7�80
8�UV
�07�80
&Y
003644|4
12N1'2015
STOE0KGEGB0UP2INC
2.258,48
8,08
2.258.48
All
n0@4|45
|I021/20|5
ST8ULK.NARKA
2-05 1,00
0.00
2,051,00
A
00364A6
12/0212015
ST0lI80U!Px4SNT
652,13
0.00
052.13
a|`
003)644 17
12*2/2015
SYSC0LOSANGELES INC'
526.42
0.00
26.42
All
00364448
|2NZ/2O|-5
TCKKA VISTA ANIMAL 8OSP|TxL
50.00
(M)8
50,00
&|`
0036-14|9
12/02/2815
l5KkYM HILL Q&SSOC|ATOSINC'
7.500VV
0.80
7,500.80
»}"
00304458
12;02/2015
1 [S%iCK,]CANYVS8
|,80U.00
8.00
1 .8O0o0
AP
0036H51
|2/02/20|j
TOTAL IMAGING SOLUTIONS
935.80
000
935,80
AP
0 036'1452
12/02/2015
TOWN AND COUNTRY UOL[CARS
36.456A8
0,00
36,456.4*
&`
0036U53
1? 02/2015
TKAN3 WEST TRUrKC6NT8K
49]9
0,00
4929
Al'
00364454
12/02/20 15
TK|MMER'PATK|C|A A
5008U
O00
500.80
AP
0O;6445�
12N2/2015
O,3, BANK PARS &CCTA6746022500
14.873b0
0M8
|4.873.68
AP
00364456
12/02/2015
U.S. BANK PARS &CCT#m46O22500
9091
0.00
96I91
xP
003,64457
12m2/2015
OND£KGKODNDSVCAL6KTOP9OCAL
243,00
0.00
243.00
0`
00@44�8
12N2/2015
UN|T2o PACIFIC S6KYlC2S INC
9,764.00
0.00
9.704.00
A 1
00364459
120212015
UPS
37.88
0,00
37.88
AP
00364460
12;02/20 15
URBAN L&MD|NST|TOT2
440.00
088
440.00
A|`
00]64461
|2N2/2015
VA|.|-CYP0YVC&3YSTLK43INC
656,39
0,00
656.3;
All
00364462
12102001 5
VAN SC0YOCxS3OOATCS INC
X'UOO.OV
0,00
8,000D0
00364-163
12 N2 Y2015
YCACFN TR0-&NYMALl{OSY|T&L
5723
0.00
5723
xP
88364465
12/02/2015
YEK|20NCAL![OKN\&
7.289, _37
1,740.15
9.029.52***
All
00364466
12/021I015
VICTOR NED|C&|COMPANY
9.339.09
0.00
9,339.09
AP
0036-1167
12n2/2015
Y|U.A0[NUKSEK|ESVYUOLL8&L2LP
|.|29-5|
0.00
}.|29j|
AP
00364468
|2,/02/2U15
YOKTFX|NDO3 FRIES INC
1.768�1 1
0,08
1,768.11
'A|`
00;64169
12N2I015
\Y&X|E8AN|[^KY SUPPLY
2.1 84�99
0.00
2]84.99
AY
00?64470
1�'022015
\YEGTEwD7wATB0ALSUPPiY
OxO
57.69
5768
AP
000447|
1202D015
Y/EST[KNiDv|vER3|[Y0[U[A[[H3O2NC2
78500
0V0
785.00
�p
0O3b4|7l
|2m2�0|�
YYHxL[\�U�wl2L[[
;5O�8O
O�08
350,00
AP
0036H73
1202D01 5
0UTT|iRF[R]lL|ZFK
1.47420
0.00
1.47420
& `
(N3h4474
|20��05
v/U|TTL[,L|NDA
17-1.00
0,00
174,00
xp
00364475
12/02/2015
Yv|LD0N AND8SLL
627.05
(00
627'05
All
00364476
12/02/2015
YV|N%CKCOKP0D&T|ON
0.00
597.02
597.02
Al'
00364477
12/02/2015
\V|RZ AND COMPANY
53l62
0.00
537.62
Al'
00364478
1202/2015
ZOET|3OSLLC
1.124.17
80)
1.124.17
A|`
00364484
|2m�/2O|5
DROD�KTROO�S
9.876�45
0.00
9.8764j
All
08364186
|2/03/20|5
CV\vD
19.310.86
972.39
20,283.25 ~*^
AP
0036|487
12N3/2015
CITRUS, MOTORS ONTARIO INC
7.437]2
0,00
7743732
AP
80364488
12m3/201 j
E\v|NG IRRIGATION PkDDUCTS
606,88
0.00
006.88
A 1
00364489
121/01/2815
}|OL[loAY ROCK C0INC
1,970J9
0J00
1.970J9
User: V1,01IFY - VERONICA LOPEZ Pnuc: 9 Current Date: 12/09/2-0 15
IZopor|:CE_AGENDA_REG_ PORTRAIT _CONSOLIDATED -CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait l Time: 14:57:12
Note:
Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures
User: VI,C)PFZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 10 Current Date: 12109;2015
I - Portrait t Time: 14:57:12
Report: CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
P10
AND
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Af4enda Check Register
1 1;23/2015 thl-OLIgh 12/8/2015
Check
No.
Check Date
Vendor Name
City
Fire Amount
Al'
00;64490
12'03/2015
HYDRO SCAPE PRODUCTS INC
1.413.27
0.00 1,413.27
AP
003644191
12/03/2015
INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLIHITIN
980,00
0.00 980.00
AP
00364492
12,10312015
KMF FIRE APPARATUS
OM 1.62156
1,623.56
AP
00364-193
12/03/2015
LANDCARE
46.883.79
0.00 46,883.79
AP
00364494
12/03/2015
LIVIS AUTO INC
3,691,16
OM 3,691,16
AP
00364195
12/03/2015
ORKIN PE-ST CONTROL
68.00
129.00 197.00
Al'
00364496
12103/2015
SUNRISF FORD
65 24
0.00 65.24
AP
00364497
12/0312015
LINIFIRST UNIFORM SFRVICF
0.00
77.17 77.17
AP
00364498
12/0312015
V I STA PAINT
967.91
0,00 967.91
Total Citv:
54,389,383.86
Total Fire:
$237,476.25
Grand Total:
34,626,860.11
Note:
Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures
User: VI,C)PFZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 10 Current Date: 12109;2015
I - Portrait t Time: 14:57:12
Report: CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register
P11
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AND
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Electronic Debit Register
November 1, 2015 - November 30, 2015
DATE
DESCRIPTION
CITY
FIRE
AMOUNT
11/2
Workers Comp - City Account Transfer
933.06
933.06
11/2
Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer
159.00
159.00
11/3
AUTHNET GATEWAY BILLING CCD 41443480
52.35
52.35
11/3
Workers Comp - City Account Transfer
432.99
432.99
11/3
Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer
2,434.83
2,434.83
11/4
Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer
3,359.12
3,359.12
11/5
CALPERS - City- Retirement Account Deposit
1,373.96
1,373.96
11/5
CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit
9,754.90
9,754.90
11/5
Workers Comp - City Account Transfer
3,866.81
3,866.81
11/5
Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer
430.65
430.65
11/6
Workers Comp - City Account Transfer
11,004.59
11,004.59
11/6
Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer
5,070.16
5,070.16
11/9
BANK TRANSFER - Community Foundation for Golf Tournament
4,010.00
4,010.00
11/9
WIRE TRANSFER - To California ISO
57,675.13
57,675.13
11/9
Workers Comp - City Account Transfer
1,347.38
1,347.38
11/9
Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer
7,282.59
7,282.59
11/10
Workers Comp - City Account Transfer
1,248.62
1,248.62
11/10
Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer
2,422.83
2,422.83
11/12
CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit
21,89193
21,893.93
11/12
CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit
198,218.34
198,218.34
11/12
CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit
815.68
815.68
11/12
CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit
1,291.35
1,291.35
11/12
CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit
3,735.78
3,735.78
11/12
CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit
4,865.55
4,865.55
11/12
CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit
7,566.69
7,566.69
11/12
CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit
105,768.23
105,768.23
11/12
STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments
2,132.23
2,132.23
11112
STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments
3,582.31
3,582.31
11/12
Workers Comp - City Account Transfer
1,393.70
1,393.70
11/12
Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer
524.19
524.19
11/13
Workers Comp - City Account Transfer
3,584.48
3,584.48
11/13
Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer
114.66
114.66
11/16
Workers Comp - City Account Transfer
582.85
582.85
11/16
Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer
26.78
26.78
11/18
CCV ORDER 353368 DEL 151119 LOC 00000001S
500.00
500.00
11118
Workers Comp - City Account Transfer
382.53
382.53
11/19
Workers Comp - City Account Transfer
24.66
24.66
11/19
Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer
2,170.38
2,170.38
11/20
Workers Comp - City Account Transfer
3,875.54
3,875.54
11/20
Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer
2,265.00
2,265.00
11/23
Workers Comp - City Account Transfer
1,219.38
1,219.38
11123
Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer
471.72
471.72
11/24
STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments
2,132.23
2,132.23
11/24
STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments
4,345.80
4,345.80
11/24
WIRE TRANSFER - To California ISO
3,396.55
3,396.55
11/24
Workers Comp - City Account Transfer
3,065.90
3,065.90
11/24
Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer
15,903.16
15,903.16
11/25
ANALYSIS DEFICIT - Bank Fee - October 2015
23,432.81
23,432.81
11/25
CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit
22,569.32
22,569.32
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AND
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Electronic Debit Register
November 1, 2015 - November 30, 2015
DATE
DESCRIPTION
CITY
FIRE
AMOUNT
11/25
CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit
198,344.93
198,344.93
11/25
Workers Comp - City Account Transfer
3,088.27
3,088.27
11/25
Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer
229.08
229.08
11/27
CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit
814.58
814.58
11/27
CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit
1,291.35
1,291.35
11/27
CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit
3,735.78
3,735.78
11/27
CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit
4,865.55
4,865.55
11/27
CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit
7,566.69
7,566.69
11/27
CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit
105,813.29
105,813.29
11/27
Workers Comp - City Account Transfer
361.20
361.20
11/27
Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer
8,744.10
8,744.10
11/30
Workers Comp - City Account Transfer
1,336.62
1,336.62
11/30
Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer
825.20
825.20
Total City $ 583,235.26
Total Fire $ 308,492.08
GRAND TOTAL $ 891,727.34
2
spa
P13
R_-�NCHO CUC IMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Date: December 16, 2015
To: President and Members of the Board of Directors
John R. Gillison, City Manager
From: Mike Costello, Fire Chief
By: Don Cloughesy, Deputy Fire Chief
Michael Courtney, Fire Facilities Supervisor
Pamela J. Pane, Management Analyst III
Subject: APPROVAL OF PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ESTIMATES AND
AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR
THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ALL-RISK
TRAINING CENTER, TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 3288501-
5650/1735288 -6314
. .• �, Wi
Staff recommends that the Fire Board approve the plans, specifications and estimates
for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District All-Risk Training Center, to be
funded from Account No. 3288501-5650/1735288-6314, and approve the attached
Resolution No. FD15-026 authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting
Bids".
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
Funding for the All-Risk Training Center has been set aside through planning and
budgeting of Fire District funds strictly allocated for Capital Building projects in District
Reserves for many decades. These property tax dollars must be used by the District for
emergency response or preparedness related matters. The All-Risk Training Center
represents the final phase of the Jersey Fire Station site plan, which was created in
1989. The first phase opened in 1992 when the Jersey Fire Station became
operational. In 2004, the District completed the second phase of the site with the
opening of the Fire Maintenance Facility. Additionally, the All-Risk Training Center
project has been included in the list of adopted Council goals for the past four-plus
years.
Per previous approval and direction from the Fire Board, District staff have been
working with the awarded Architect and Construction Management firm to develop the
construction plans for the center. The facility will maximize the skills and capabilities of
our partner public safety organizations, as well as, regional public safety partners and
211111
ALL -RISK TRAINING CENTER PROJECT 11N0,i,jci,'1 INVITING BIDS"
Di,1'('FN1B1`R 16, 2015
teams of trained citizen volunteers (CERT). As one example, the facility can be used by
Rancho Cucamonga Fire and Sheriff for joint police and fire training of active shooter
type scenarios and will be available to all other regional agencies for the same use.
Public meeting spaces and an education center will provide opportunities for risk
reduction programs and community engagement activities.
The District recommends that the Fire Board approve the plans, specifications and
estimates for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District All-Risk Training Center,
to be funded from Account No. 3288501-5650/1735288-6314, and approve the attached
Resolution No. FD15-026 authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting
Bids".
Respectfully submitted,
Mike Costello
Attachments: Vicinity Map
Resolution FD15-026
t E1
■
0
s
.................
tr
tt
- 3y f
---- ---- --
Z..
■
0
s
.................
tr
tt
OU
- 3y f
---- ---- --
OU
Ell 6
or
771"
Ell
I m
C�
C)
(D
11 1
P11 5
g-
---- ---- --
Z..
Ell 6
or
771"
Ell
I m
C�
C)
(D
11 1
P11 5
g-
P16
WHEREAS, hiS the intention of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District
tO construct certain improvements iD the City Of Rancho Cucamonga.
WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District has prepared plans
and specifications for the construction Of certain improvements.
NOW. THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAD8ONGA FIRE PROTECTION
DISTRICT BOARD, GEElEB`y RESOLVES, that the plans and specifications presented by the
Rancho CUC@nnUOga Fire P[OteCLiOD District be and are hereby approved as the p|8DS and
specifications for the "ALL-RISK TRAINING CENTER"
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVE[} that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and
directed LO advertise as required by law for the receipt Of S88|ed bids or pn]pOS8|S for doing the
vvO[h specified in the aforesaid p|8DS and specifications, which said advertisement shall be
substantially in the following VVOPdS and figures, to wit:
Pursuant to a Resolution of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire P[OteChOD District, 88D Be[D8ndiO0
County, California, directing this DOdC8. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said R8DChO
CUC8OlOOg8 Fire P[OtBCtiOO District will receive at the CDUOCi| Chambers in the offices of the
City of RGOChO CUC@0OOg8` OO Or before the hour Of2:OO p.0. on TueSday, February 18, 2010,
sealed bids or proposals for the " ALL-RISK TRAINING CENTER " in said City.
Bids will be publicly opened and read in the Council ChanlbB[S, 10500 Civic Center D[iVe,
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730.
Bids [DUGt be [D8d8 OD 8 form provided for the purpose, addressed to the Rancho Cucamonga
Fins Protection [}iethot. marked, ''Bid for Construction of the "ALL-RISK TRAINING CENTER "
A will be held on ThurSd@y. January 14. 2018.
beginning at 9:00 a.m. at Fire Station 174 located at 11297 Jersey 0|Vd, Rancho Cucamonga,
CX
PREVAILING \8/AGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of
California Labor COde, Division 2, Part 7' Chapter 1. /\rti[J8S 1 and 2. the CODt[BCtOr is required
to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per dieDl vv8Q8S for work of Si[Di|8[ Ch@[8Ct8[
in the |OC8|ity in which the public work is performed, and not |eSS than the geD8[8| prevailing rate
Of per them wages for holiday and overtime work. |n that regard, the Director Of the Department
Of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general
pFeV@i|iOQ rates Of per dieDl wages. Copies of such p[eV@i|iOQ rates of per them vv@geG are OD
file in the office of the City C|8[h, City of Rancho CUC@nOODQ@, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
COCan0DOg8, California, and are available to any interested party on request. They can also be
P17
found at under the "Statistics and Research" Tab. The Contracting Agency
also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site.
Pursuant bJ provisions Of Labor Code Section 1775.the Contractor shall forfeit, @S penalty UDthe
R8DChO CUCaDlOOg8 Fine Protection Oi8thCt' not more than two hundred doU8nS ($200.00) for
each |8bOre[' VVOd([D8O. or 0eCh@OiC employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such
|abOnBr' vvOrhOnaO or mechanic is paid |eSS than the general prevailing rate of wages herein
before stipulated for any vvOrh done under the attached COOt[8Ct, by him or by any SUbCUOt[8CtU[
under him, iD violation Of the provisions of said Labor Code.
Attention is directed to the provisions in GeCdOOS 1777.5 and 1777.6 Of the Labor Code
concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him.
Section 1777.5. as amended, requires the Contractor Or subcontractor employing tradesmen in
any appFeDtic8b|e OcCVpEdinn to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee O88r8St the site Of
the public VVO[kS project and which administers the apprenticeship pF0g[3OO in that trade for a
certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio Of apprentices tO j0U[OeyDleO that will
be used in the pedo[[D8OCe of the CODt[8Ct. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such
cases shall not be less than one [Vfive except
A. When UO8DlD|OyDle[t in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee
has exceeded an 8me[Ug8 Of 15 percent in the 90 days phO[ to the request Of
certificate, or
B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds 8 ratio Of one U}five,
Or
C. When the trade can show that biS replacing at least 18OOf its membership through
apprenticeship training 8O3O annual basis statewide O[ locally, O[
D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on
all of his contracts DO an @OOU8| 8Ve[8gB of not less than one apprentice b}eight
journeymen.
The CODtr8CtOF is required t0 make &OOthbUti0OS to funds established for the 8dDliDiStr@bOD Of
apprenticeship pFOg[8[DS if he eDlp|OyS registered apprentices or journeymen in any
8ppFeDt|C@b|e trade OO such CODtF8CtS and if other Contractors UO the public works Site are
making such contributions.
The Contractor and SUbCODt[8CtU[ UOdB[ him Sh8U comply with the FBqUineDl8OtS of Sections
1777.5 and 1777.8 in the employment Ofapprentices.
|nf0[nladOn relative to apprenticeship standards, wage GChedU|eS' and other requirements may
be obtained from the Director Of |DdUsth8| Re|8tiOOS, ex-officio the Administrator Of
AppFeObC8ship, 88O F[3DCiSCO, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and
its branch offices.
Eight 08) hours of labor shall constitute @ legal day's VYO[h for all workmen enlD|Oved in the
execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with
and be governed by the |@vvS of the State Of California having to do with vvOdhiOg hOU[S 88 set
forth in Division 2, Part 7' Chapter 1. Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as
amended.
The Contractor shall forfeit, as 8 penalty tDthe R8DdlO CUC8OOODg8 Fire Protection District,
twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution
UFV
of the cDOtract, by him or any SUbCOOtF8C[Or under him, UpOD any of the VVO[k herein before
mentioned, for each calendar day during which Said |8boPe[' vvOrkOO8O, or mechanic is required
Vr permitted [0 labor more than eight (8) hours iO violation Of said Labor Code.
Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each VVO[kDl8O needed to eX8CUhe the
work required by this COOt[8ct 88 such t[8Ve| and subsistence payments are defined in the
applicable collective bargaining agreement filed iO accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.1.
The bidder must submit with his p[OpOS8|. C8gh. cashier's Check. Certified check, or bidder's
bOOd, payable to the FlaDChO CUC8[DODg8 Fire Protection District for GO amount equal to at least
1096 of the 8n0QUOt of said bid as @ gU8[@Ote8 that the bidder will enter into the proposed
contract if the S@Dle is 8VV8nded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such CODt[8Ct said
cash. cashiers' CheCk, Certified Check' or bond ShG|| become the property of the R8OChO
{}uC8/DOOQ8 Fire Protection District.
If the R8OChO CUC8FOOOga Fire PFOtBCiiOO OiSt[iC[ @Vv8[ds the contract to the next |UvveSt bidder,
the UDlOUOt of the lowest bidder's security Sh8|| be applied by the R8OChO CUC@[DOOg8 Fire
Protection District to the difference between the |OVV bid and the SeCOOd |Ovv8St bid, and the
surplus, if any shall be returned tO the lowest bidder.
The 8DlOUOt of the bond to be given to SeCUFe 3 faithful performance of the contract for said
VVOrh shall be 100% of the Cnnt[@Ct price thereof, and an additional bond in an aDlOUOt equal to
10096 of the COOt[8Ct price for said vvO[h ShG|| be given to SeCu[8 the payment of claims for any
materials Or supplies furnished for the performance of the vvO[k COOt[8Cted to be done by the
Contractor, Or any work or |8bO[ of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be
[8qUi[8d to furnish 8 certificate that he C8[[ieS COrDpeOS8doD insurance covering his employees
UpOO work to be done Under CVAt[8{t which may be entered into between him and the said
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District for the construction of said work.
Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and d@SS as [8qUi[8d by any
and all applicable |8vvS with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this
CODt[8Ct in accordance with the provisions of the COD[[8Ctor'S License L@vv (California BuGiO83S
and Professions COd8, Section 7000 8t. seq.) and rU|8S and r8gU|8tiUD adopted pursuant
thereto.
The Contractor, pursuant to the "California BUSiOe3S and Professions Code," Section 7028.15.
Sh8U indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date' and
be signed by the CODt[8CtOF dBC|BhDg, under penalty of perjUry, that the information being
provided iS true and correct.
The vVO[k is to be dOO8 in accordance with the p[Of|eS. p|8OS, and specifications of the Rancho
CUC80oDg8 Fire Protection [)iSth(t on file in the DffiC8 of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center
Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
In an effort to QO green and p8pBdeSS, digital copies Of the D|8DG. SDeCifiC8tOOS. and bid
proposal, including any future addenda O[ revisions tO the bid documents, are available by going
to www.ciplist.com and signing Up, by going to Member Login 0r Member 8igOUp (it's free), then
ChOOSe California, then SCrOU dOvvD to San Be[OGndiDO County and click on B[OVvS8 Cities, then
SCnO|| dOVvO to F|8OChO CuC8DlOOga and click QD City Projects, then diCh VO the Project Of
interest under the Title and fO||OVY directions for dovvO|O3d. Note, CUpi8S Of the p|3OS'
SpeCifiCadOOS, bid p[OpOSg|' 8ddeDdUnlsGOd revisions will not be provided, digital copies must
be dOvvO|O8dBd from the above vvebSite then printed. Prospective bidders must register for 8O
account on www.ciplist.com to be iOC|Ud8d OO the prospective bidder's |iSt/S\ and to receive
oDlai| Updates of any addenda or revisions to the bid documents. Be advised that the
iOfO[rDaUOO C0Ot8iD8d OO this site may change over time and without DOtiC8 t0 prospective
P19
bidders or registered users. While effort is made to keep information current and accurate and
to notify registered prospective bidders of any changes to the bid documents, it is the
responsibility of each prospective bidder to register with www.ciplist.com and to check this
website on a DAILY basis through the close of bids for any applicable addenda or updates.
No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been
issued by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to registered prospective
bidders from www.ciplist.com.
The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the Rancho
Cucamonga Fire Protection District.
In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in
the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the
Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense,
substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention).
The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, reserves the right to reject any or all bids.
Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for the "ALL-RISK TRAINING CENTER" may be
directed to:
Michael Courtney or
Fire Facilities Supervisor
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
(909) 477-2740, ext. 4155
(e-mail at michael.courtnev(a.citvofrc.us.)
Pamela Pane
Management Analyst 111
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
(909) 477-2740 ext. 3006
(e-mail at parnela.pane(a�cityoftc.us)
All questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids must be in writing (e-mail is acceptable)
and received by the District no later than 5:00 pm on Thursday, January 28, 2016. The
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District is not responsible for questions
undeliverable.
ADVERTISE ON: December 22, 2015, and January 5, 2016.
IL
5ED7JCE8GRODP
Date: December 1O,2O15
TO: President and Members Ofthe Board OfDirectors
John R. GiUiSOO. City Manager
From: Lori 88SSOOO. Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services
By: Robert Neiuber, Human Resources Director
Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OFA RESOLUTION ADOPTING FIRE DISTRICT
SALARY SCHEDULES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 INCLUDING A PART-TIME
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SUMMARY
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Fire Board of the R8OCh0 CUCGnO0ngG Fire Protection District adopt the
attached resolution approving the FiSC8| Year 2015/18 salary schedules for Fire District job
classifications including 8 part-time employee benefit summary.
MIT" 110109111 Z I
The FlFB Board traditionally adopts S8|8[y resolutions bk]ODU2|k/ for those d8SSUic@toOG employed
by the Fire District. These resolutions are updated to reflect changes in salaries, steps, additions and
deletions of classifications, changes in job titles and other terms of employment.
There are no changes to this salary schedule from what was adopted in June and effective the first
hJU pay period in July.
Attachment
1. Resolution 15-027
2� Salary Schedule for Fire Management Group Classifications
3. Salary Schedule for Fire Union Job Classifications
4. Salary Schedule for Fire Support Services Association Job Classifications
5. 88|8ry Schedule for Fire Support Services Association Part-Time Job Classifications
0. Part-Time Employee Benefit Summary
7. Part-Time Employee's Uniform policy
RESOLUTION NO. FD 15 -027
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT,
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SALARY
SCHEDULES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 INCLUDING A PART -
TIME EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SUMMARY.
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District has
determined that it is necessary for the efficient operation and management of the District that
policies be established prescribing salary ranges, benefits and holidays and other policies for
employees of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District has
previously adopted salary resolutions that established salary ranges, benefits and other terms of
employment for employees of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District
recognizes that it is necessary from time to time to amend the salary resolution to accommodate
changes in position titles, classifications salary ranges, benefits and other terms of employment
including an outline of State and Federally required benefits afforded to part -time employees; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Rancho
Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Rancho Cucamonga, California to approve the attached
salary schedules for the Fire Union, Fire Management Employees Group and Fire Support
Services Association (Attachments 1 -4) effective the first full pay period in July and approve the
part -time benefit summary (Attachment 5).
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 12015.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
ATTEST:
Janice Reynolds, Secretary
L. Dennis Michael, President
P21
I, Janice Reynolds, Secretary of the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection
District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted
by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a Meeting of said
Board on the day of , 2015.
Executed this _ day of , 2015 at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Janice Reynolds, Secretary
CP
O
z
0
0
ch
a)
U�
,G T •
•
•
P23
Q)
Q)
Q)
Q)
w
:E
0 0
O} 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
O.-L 0
= ED 2i
:E FO
S CO
S Co 2
S m 2i
00 o CY)
LO 0 CY)
C6 (.6 (b
OD co 00
1 t I
I I I
(q V�
(D
CY) CN N
C) C\j
Lo cy)
r- (Y)
r- CO
r- LO
C? to .
QD (D
. . .
LO rl- NT
Er) 14- OD
(N �
0) r- (.0
0) 0) V-
0) u)
uj
0
0) =
r- (0 0)
NO
(D Iq C14
(D Iq N
'q- Lo
(D 0')
0
m rl-
LO
LO 0
LO 0
CY) r-
(D (Y)
U) N
(N
CY) LO N
C) 0 (r)
CY) U) N
I- LO (N
CD. lq 00
r- LX) (N
0 Iq 00
Cq
O co cy)
r- CY)
00 V LO
Lo 0)
14- 00
r- . LO
(D LO
(D 00 LD
Q6 L6
(C) 00 LO
LO 'q 00
'4- Lc) .-
>-
LL
00 CY) I-0
CD C\l
r- (D (Y)
O=
'T co Lr)
(N
CN
C\j 141
(D 0)
CY) 1�
Lri
LO
0
0 Iz IT
C) CY)
d' t- 0)
N r- CY)
CN r- 0)
(0
r- LO
D
oo = (f)
(N (D co
0) tl- 14,
0) r- "q
Q) r- Iq
C14
Lo. Ili, 00
M lzi Lo
C\l in CY)
It (Y) (1)
(N Cl) (D
C-4 CY) (D
.
IT LO =
Z
w
00 C) N
r- r- =
Nr Cl) 0
(.0 Cl) C)
(C) ce) C)
co 0)
r--� Lo
rl- LO
CD 0)
CD 0)
0 C;)
M r-
Ld C\�
Ld O
Ld 6
txi 6
z
uj
LL
r CD Lf)
(D 00 (N
C) (0 d
ce) (0 NT
(Y) (D C7
CL
rl- LO
00 0) CD
r- LO 0)
00 0
0') 0 =
0) 0
F-
Lo 'q 0c)
0
cy) Iq CY)
00 0 r-
C\1 14- r-
0) IZ3- 1--
0-) -T r--
U)
4 Lo ='
Imo- 00 Cl)
(0 0 —
It 0) co
LO 0) OD
LO 0) 00
W
co CY)
(f)
cy� oc�
Lr� Q)
rl-, cy�
[--� CY)
r- CY)
ul
Cl) r-
<
(D Cl)
LO
0
'q
—
U-
uj
0)
00 LO
r- I-
fl- r-
r- r- —
U-
r- Ln —
(D
O 01) r
d M d
=
1-- [-- LI)
ID r- LO
C) rl- LO
0
LO Iq 00
CD (Z) V)
LX) 00 0
CD LO N
tl- LO N
r-, L6 N
Lo
D
1- 00 1,-
(D (Y) LO
Iz (D 0)
LO (D CY)
LO (0 0)
z
(D CY)
(::) —
C14 m
LO 00
LO 00
Lo co
(Y) r-
(6 (Y�
L6
C
d cr
d cr�
z
uj
0') CY) CD
(D 0) (N
cli (D Iz
LO (D IT
LO (D
t- LO —
M N oo
M= 0)
00 CY) It
co m
(Y) CY)
LO 00
r-
(N 0.) 0)
CO co
4 06
'q 00
U.
w
.
'q Lr)
r- 0) Iq
CO CO 0
CY) It N
LO 1-j- C\j
LO Iq (N
(D G)
tl- LO
0) 00
CY) 14-
Cl) It
m d
Z
CY) r-
1.6 C\i
r1 o
d 0
v C6
d C6
Z
' 00
0 Qc)
00 CD CD
r- CY) CD
0) C)
0
r- Lo —
0? LO. N
d (D f
G) CN. 00
r-, (N. Co.
r-, N. 00.
LO '�t 00
CO LO C)
0) LO
(D — (N
CN
N
<
Lo
(0 = LO
Lr) LO 0)
Cl) 'T [--
LO d rl-
LO IT r-
(D 0)
LO a)
I,- (N
CY)
0)
— 0)
(Y) I,-
45
6
V CO
d CO
V: CO
<
U-
U.
LLJ
Lij
U-
=
3:
LLJ
U Y
U
Z (1)
Z Q)
L)
o
o
<
LL
ui
< 0
< 0
F-
r
F-
ui
<
<
<
m 0
co 0
ui
LIJ
LLj T-
LLJ -r
ui
(o
o
IL
LL
P23
yz1
Resolution No, 15 -027
FIRE UNION
ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES
JANUARY 2, 2016
HAZARDOUS MATERIAL STIPEND (5% of Fire Enqr. Step E)
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
FIRE CAPTAIN
27.64
29.02
30.47
32.00
3159
3527
37.04 Hourly
160.36
3;095.51
3,250.29
3,412.80
3,583.44
3,762.61
3,950.74
4,14828 Bi- Weekly
347.44
6,706.94
7,042.29
7,394.40
7,76412
8,152.33
8,559.95
8,987,94 Monthly
FIRE CAPTAIN
27.64
29.02
30.47
32.00
3159
35.27
37.04 Hourly
SPECIALIST
3,095.51
3,250.29
3,412.80
3,583.44
3,762.61
3,950.74
4,148.28 Bi- Weekly
446.43
6,706.94
7,04229
7,394.40
7,76412
8,152.33
8,559.95
8,987.94 Monthly
FIRE ENGINEER
23.56
24.74
25.97
27.27
28.64
30.07
31.57 Hourly
3.12
2,638.52
2,770.45
2,908.97
3,054.42
3,207.14
3,367.50
3,535.87 Bi- Weekly
349.92
5,716.80
6,002.64
6,302.77
6,617.91
6,948.81
7,296.25
7,661.06 Monthly
FIREFIGHTER
20.59
21.62
22.70
23.83
25.03
26.28
27.59 Hourly
2,306.00
2,421.31
2,542.37
2,669.49
2,802.96
2,943.11
3,090.27 Bi- Weekly
1.43
4,996.34
5,246.16
5,508.47
5,78189
6,073.09
6,376.74
6,695.58 Monthly
FIRE INSPECTOR
23.56
24.74
25.97
27.27
28.64
30.07
31.57 Hourly
347.44
2,638.52
2,770.45
2,908.97
3,054.42
3,20714
3,367.50
3,535.87 Bi- Weekly
0.72
5,716.80
6,002.64
6,302.77
6,617.91
6,948.81
7,296.25
7,661.06 Monthly
FIELD TRAINING OFFICER
27.64
29.02
30.47
32.00
33.59
35.27
37.04 Hourly
173.72
3,095.51
3,250.29
3,412.80
3,583.44
3,762.61
3,950.74
4,148.28 Bi- Weekly
Officer Certification
6,706.94
7,04229
7,394.40
7,764.12
8,152.33
8,559.95
8,987.94 Monthly
HAZARDOUS MATERIAL STIPEND (5% of Fire Enqr. Step E)
1.43
1.43
1.43
1.43
1.43
1.43
1.43
Hourly
160.36
160.36
160.36
160.36
160.36
160.36
160.36
Bi- Weekly
347.44
347.44
347.44
347.44
347.44
347.44
347.44
Monthly
PARAMEDIC
STIPEND (13.92%
of Fire Enqr. Step
E)
3.99
3.99
199
3.99
199
3.99
3.99
Hourly
446.43
446.43
446.43
446.43
446,43
446.43
446.43
Bi- Weekly
96727
967.27
967.27
967.27
967.27
96727
967.27
Monthly
FIELD TRAINING OFFICER STIPEND (9.3% of Fire Capt. Step
E)
312
3.12
312
3.12
3.12
3.12
3.12
Hourly
349.92
349.92
349.92
349.92
349.92
349.92
349.92
Bi- Weekly
758.17
758.17
758.17
758.17
75817
758.17
758.17
Monthly
TECHNICAL RESCUE STIPEND (5% of Fire Enqr. Step E)
1.43
1.43
1.43
1.43
1.43
1.43
1.43
Hourly
160.36
160.36
160.36
160.36
160.36
160.36
160.36
Bi- Weekly
347.44
347.44
347.44
347.44
347.44
347.44
347.44
Monthly
TERRORISM
LIAISON OFFICER STIPEND (2.5% of Fire Enqr. Step E)
0.72
0.72
0.72
0.72
0.72
0.72
0.72
Hourly
80.18
80.18
80.18
80.18
80.18
80.18
80.18
Bi- Weekly
173.72
173.72
173.72
173.72
173.72
173.72
173.72
Monthly
BA BS or Fire
Officer Certification
1.31
1.31
1.31
1.31
1.31
1.31
1.31
Hourly
146.31
146.31
146.31
146.31
146.31
146.31
146.31
Bi- Weekly
317.00
317.00
317.00
317.00
317.00
317.00
317.00
Monthly
MA MS or Chief Officer Certification
1.96
1.96
1.96
1.96
1.96
1.96
1.96
Hourly
219.23
219.23
219.23
219.23
219.23
219.23
219.23
Bi- Weekly
475.00
475.00
475.00
475.00
475.00
475.00
475.00
Monthly
Resolution #15-027
FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES ASSOCIATION
SALARY SCHEDULE ASOF JANUARY 2.2OiG
A B C D E F
COMMUNICATIONS TECHNICIAN
2438
25.60
28.88
2823
29.84
3112
Hourly
1.95059
2.04812
2.150.52
2.258.05
2.370.96
2.480.50
Bi-Weekly
4.22627
4.437.60
4.65947
4.892.44
5.137.07
5.393.93
Monthly
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
34.90
36.60
38.56
40.53
42.39
44.51
Hourly
COORDINATOR
2.792.07
2.834.86
3.084.95
3.24272
3.391�59
3.501,17
Bi40eekly
8.049.00
6.359.00
6.684.00
7.026.00
7.848.00
7.715.40
Monthly
EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
37,51
39.38
41.35
43,42
46�59
47.87
Hourly
ADMINISTRATOR
3.000.67
3.150.71
3.308.24
3.473.65
3.647.34
3.82970
Bi'VVaek|y
6.501.48
8.828.53
7.167.86
7.526,25
7.002.56
8.287,69
Monthly
FIRE EQUIPMENT APPRENTICE
1&58
19.51
20.48
21.51
22.58
23.71
Hourly
MECHANIC
1.48618
1.580.47
1.638.40
1.720.42
1.808.44
1.898.77
Bi4&eekly
3.220.02
3.381�02
3.550.07
3.727�58
3.913.98
4.109.66
Monthly
FIRE EQUIPMENT LEAD MECHANIC
25�60
26.88
28.23
20�64
31,12
32.67
Hourly
2.04812
2.150.52
2.258.05
2.370.05
2.489.50
2.613.98
8i-Weekly
4437�59
4659.47
4892.44
5137.06
5303.92
5.663.82
Monthly
FIRE EQUIPMENT MECHANIC
23.22
24.38
25.60
28.88
28.23
29.84
Hourly
1.857J0
1.850.59
2.048.12
2.150.53
2.258.05
2.370.96
Bi-Weekly
4.025S2
4.226.27
4.437.59
4.859.47
4.802.45
5.137.07
Monthly
FIRE INFORMATION SYSTEMS
23.14
24.29
25.51
2878
28.12
29.53
Hourly
TECHNICIAN
1.850.93
1.943.47
2.040.84
2.142�68
2.249.81
2.362.30
Bi'VVaekly
4.010.34
4.210.85
4.421.40
4.642.47
4.874.59
5.11&32
Monthly
FIRE PREVENTION SPECIALIST
24.49
25.72
27.00
2835
28,77
31.26
Hourly
INSPECTION |
1.85935
2.057�32
2.160.19
2.268,30
3.381,61
2.500.60
Bi-Weekly
4.245.26
4.457�52
4.680.40
4.914.42
5`180,15
5.418.15
Monthly
FIRE PREVENTION SPECIALIST
27.00
2835
29.77
3126
32.82
34.48
Hourly
INSPECTION U
2.160.18
2.268.10
2.381.60
2.500�69
2,625.72
3.757�00
Bi-Weekly
4.680.40
4.014.42
5.180.14
5.418.16
5.689.06
5.973.51
Monthly
FIRE PREVENTION SUPERVISOR 30.72 32.26 33.87 35.56 37,34 3921 Hourly
2.457�74 2.580,83 2.709,66 2.845.14 2.987.40 3,136.77 Bi-Weekly
5,325 11 5,591.36 5,870.93 6,164A8 6,472,70 6,796.34 Monthly
FIRE SHOP SUPERVISOR 30.72 32.26 33.87 35.56 37.34 39.21 Hourly
2.467.74 2.580,63 2.708.66 2.845.14 2.987.40 3,136.77 Bi'VVoeNy
5.325.11 5.591.36 5.870.93 6.164.48 8.472J0 6.796.34 Monthly
FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES ASSOCIATION
SALARY SCHEDULE ASOF JANUARY 2.2OiG
A
B
C
D
E
F
MAINTENANCE OFFICER 34�92
38.67
38.50
40.42
42.45
44.57 Hourly
2.793,57
2.033.25
3.079.02
3.233.91
3.385.81
3.565,39 Bi-Weekly
6.052�74
6.355.38
8.673.15
7.006.81
7.357,16
7.725.02 Monthly
MANAGEMENT AIDE 24.01 25.24 26.53 27.88 29.16 30.62 Hourly
1.920J6 2.018.98 2.122.24 2.230J7 2.333.18 2.449.84 Bi-Weekly
4.164.00 4.377.00 4.601.00 4.836.00 5.058,00 5.310.90 Monthly
MANAGEMENT ANALYST | 27�88 29.31 30.81 32.38 33.87 35.56 Hourly
2.230.77 2.344.85 2.484.76 2.590.81 2.709J6 2.845.25 Bi4Week|y
4.833.00 5.080.00 5.340.00 5.613.00 5.871.00 6.184.55 [Nnn\h|y
MANAGEMENT ANALYST U 32.88 33J0 35.43 37.24 38.95 40.90 Hourly
2.565�00 2.69628 2.834.17 2.978.11 3.116.88 3.271.87 Bi-Weekly
5.567�00 5.842.00 8.140.00 6.454.00 6.751.00 7.088.55 Monthly
MANAGEMENT ANALYST U| 34.90 36�69 38.56 40.53 42.39 44.51 Hourly
2.792.07 2.934.86 3.084.05 3.242.72 3.391.59 3.561,17 Bi-Weekly
6.048,00 6.359.00 8.684.00 7.026.00 7.348.00 7.715,40 Monthly
OFFICE SERVICES CLERK 16.85 17.71 18.62 19.57 20.47 21.40 Hourly
1.347,88 1.416.91 1.48937 1.685�54 1.637,41 1.719.28 Bi'VVeak|y
2,922.00 3,072,00 3,229.00 3,394.00 3,550,00 3,727.50 Monthly
OFFICE SPECIALIST | 15.25 16,03 16.85 17.71 18.52 19.45 Hourly
1.220,00 1.282.39 1.347.98 1.416�01 1.481,96 1.556.06 8i-Weekly
2,645.00 2,78000 2,922.00 3,072.00 3,213.00 3,373.65 Monthly
OFFICE SPECIALIST U 16.85 1771 18.62 19.57 30A7 21.49 Hourly
1.347,08 1.416.01 1.48837 1.565.54 1.637A1 1.719.28 Bi-Weekly
2,922.00 3,072.00 3,229.00 3,394.00 3,55000 3,727.50 Monthly
PLANS EXAMINER -FIRE 32.08
33.68
3537
37,13
38�99
40�94
Hourly
2.586.22
2.694.54
2.82926
2.97073
3.11926
3.275.22
Bi4xveek|y
5.560.15
5.838.16
6.130.07
6.436,57
6.758.39
7.096.31
Monthly
PUBLIC EDUCATION 27.00
2835
28J7
31,26
32.82
34.48
Hourly
SPECIALIST 2.160.18
2.268.19
2.381.60
2.500.69
2.62572
2.757.01
Bi-VVaek|y
4.680.40
4.914A2
5.180�14
5.418.18
5.689.06
5.97151
Monthly
SECRETARY 19,09
20.04
21.04
22,09
2320
24.36
Hourly
1.52G81
1.603.15
1.683.31
1.767.47
1.855.85
1.948.64
Bi-Weekly
3.308�09
3.473,50
3.647.17
3.829.53
4.021.00
4.222.08
Monthly
SENIOR ADMINISTRATIVE 24.49
2573
27.01
28.36
29.77
31.26
Hourly
SECRETARY 1.959,80
2.057.26
2.160,12
2.268.13
2.381.54
3.500.62
8i-Weekly
4.245�15
4.457.40
4.68027
4.914.29
5.160.00
5.418O0
Monthly
FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES
PART-TIME HOURLY
SALARY SCHEDULE ASOF JANUARY 2.2UiG
COMMUNICATIONS TECHNICIAN
EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT NURSE
FIRE CLERK
FIRE EQUIPMENT MECHANIC
FIRE INFORMATION SYSTEMS
TECHNICIAN
FIRE PREVENTION ASSISTANT
TEMPORARY/PART-TIME
FIRE PREVENTION SPECIALIST
INSPECTION
MANAGEMENT AIDE
MANAGEMENT ANALYST |
OFFICE SERVICES CLERK
OFFICE SPECIALIST |
OFFICE SPECIALIST U
PLANS EXAMINER 'FIRE
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT
SPECIALIST
Resolution # 15-027
A
B
C
D
E
F
24.38
25.60
26,88
28.23
29.64
31.12
Hourly
41.14
43.20
45�36
47,62
50.01
52.51
Hourly
10.24
1075
1129
11.85
12.45
1107
Hourly
2122
24.38
25.60
26.88
28.33
29.84
Hourly
23.14
24.29
25.51
2G78
28.12
29.53
Hourly
10.24
10J5
1129
11.85
12.45
13.07
Hourly
24A9
25.72
27.00
2835
29.77
31.26
Hourly
24.01
25.24
26.53
27.88
29.16
30,62
Hourly
27.83
28.31
30.81
32.39
33.87
35,56
Hourly
18.85
1771
18.62
19.57
20.47
21.49
Hourly
15.25
16.03
18.85
1771
18.52
19.45
Hourly
1G85
1771
18.62
19.57
20,47
21.49
Hourly
32,08
33.68
35.37
37.13
38.99
40O4
Hourly
27J9
29.18
30.64
32.17
3378
35�47
Hourly
N
ADOPTED • RESOLUTION •
DECEMBER
The following benefits are approved via resolution by the Board of Directors of the Rancho
Cucamonga Fire Protection District effective January 2, 2016.
All part -time employees are employed "at- will" and serve at the pleasure of the appointing
authority. As such, their services can be discontinued without cause or right of appeal.
The District determines the number of part -time employees required in order to meet their needs
depending on their approved budget for part -time employees and the approval of the City
Manager
In general, part -time employees are only eligible for mandated State and Federal benefits except
for specifically designated Work Life Balance Part -time employees as outlined below under the
"Work -life Balance Section."
Definition — PART -TIME EMPLOYEE: A person serving in a budgeted position of less than forty
(40) hours per week on average over a year, and typically less than 1,040 hours per year as
further defined under Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Personnel Rules and
Regulations 11(c). Part -time employees are at -will and may be terminated without cause or right
of appeal.
Retirement Benefits — The District either provides access to retirement benefits through the
Accumulation Program for Part -Time Limited - service Employees (APPLE) or the California Public
Employees Retirement System (CaIPERS) as outlined below.
APPLE — Part -time employees who work less than 1,000 hours in a fiscal year, are not a current
CaIPERS Member or who otherwise do not qualify for CaIPERS retirement benefits under State
law or CaIPERS regulations must contribute 7.5% of base pay to APPLE — a required alternative
retirement system.
CaIPERS — Part -time employees who work 1,000 hours or more in a fiscal year, are hired to work
more than 20 hours per week on average, are current CaIPERS Members or who otherwise would
qualify for CaIPERS retirement benefits under State law or CaIPERS regulations must contribute
the full employee member contribution towards their CaIPERS retirement benefits and "New
Members" as defined by CaIPERS must pay half the normal cost.
The CaIPERS retirement benefits available for qualifying part -time employees depend on the date
the employee qualified for CaIPERS benefits.
Tier 1 Part -time Employees who qualified for CaIPERS benefits before July 9, 2011
§ 21354.4 2.5% at 55 Full Formula
§ 21574 4th Level 1959 Survivor
§ 20042 1 Year Final Compensation
Tier 2 Part -time Employees who qualified for CaIPERS benefits on or after July 9, 2011 and
before January 1, 2013
§ 21354 2% @ 55 Full Formula
§ 21574 4th Level 1959 Survivor
§ 20037 3 Year Final Compensation
PART-TIME EMPLOYEE BENEFITS SUMMARY
ADOPTED PER RESOLUTION 15-027
DECEMBER 1O.2O15
Tier Part-time EnOp|OyBeS not considered "New Members" by Ca|PERG who qualified for
Co|PER8 benefits nnor After January 1.2O13
§21354 296@55 Full Formula
§ 21574 4th Level 1959 Survivor
820O37 3 Year Final Compensation
Tier Part-time Employees meeting the CalPERS definition of "New Members" who qualified for
Co|PER8 benefits oDo[ After January 1.2O13
§7522.2O 296@O2 Full Formula
87522.32 36 Consecutive Months
§7522.1O Based on Pensionable Compensation
Unit members hired on and after January 1. 2013. deemed to be g "new member" as defined in
G0vo[Onn8OtCVd8G7522O4.ShG||iOdiVidua||ypoyoninitio|Mernbe[C/\LPER8COntributioOrate
Of5O96of the normal cost rate for the Defined Benefit Plan iO which said "new member" isenrolled,
rounded to the nearest quarter of 1Y6. or the current contribution rate of Sinl||@dy situated
employees, whichever iagreater. This rate can increase based 0DC8|PER8regulations.
The District d08a not participate in 8Dci3| 88CU[ity except for the mandatory Medicare Program,
Medical Insurance Benefits —Tho District provides aooeoe to medical insurance for part-time
employees who qualify for the Affordable Care Act (8{|/\) under the Districts' policy.
In genero|, employees who work 30 or more hOUnS per week on average per year would qu8|ifv,
but the District's policy and the federal law determine who specifically qualifies for these benefits.
ForthVsepart- ti[Oe employees who qualify for this benefit, the District contributes the cost of the
|Uvv8St C0St self only COv8F8ge O0iOUS 9.596 of the Federal Poverty Line [OUDdHd down to the
nearest dollar towards the cost of medical insurance.
For example:
In 2014, the FPL was $973.50 per month, and 9.596 of that is 92.38/nloOth. In 2014. the
lowest cost self-only coverage cost was B|U8 Shield NetVa|ue — COStiOg $395.00 per
month. Following the policy, the District would pay $3O3 towards any health care plan the
ACA eligible part-time employee chooses and the employee would pay the difference,
which for the lowest cost self-only coverage would b8$93.00.
Page 2 of 4
PART -TIME EMPLOYEE BENEFITS SUMMARY
ADOPTED PER RESOLUTION 15 -027
DECEMBER 16, 2015
P30
WORK -LIFE BALANCE PART -TIME EMPLOYEES BENEFITS
FOR SPECIFICALLY DESIGNATED POSITION
Specifically designated Part -time employees in specific management, supervisory, professional
and /or confidential type positions, as designated by the City Manager and noted on the Personnel
Action Report, who are scheduled to work 32 hours per week on a year -round basis, are referred
to as work -life balance part -time employees. The City Manager will review and if appropriate
amend the list of designated work life balance employees at least once per year as part of his /her
budget review process. Work -life balance part -time employees participate in the State and
Federally required benefits as enumerated above and shall receive the following additional
benefits:
Medical Insurance: In accordance with the District's ACA policy, work -life balance part -time
employees are eligible to participate in the District's medical plan.
The District will pay the higher of the ACA policy contribution or 80% of the cost the District would
pay for a full -time employee in the same position towards medical insurance premium costs. In
2013, the maximum the District would pay for medical insurance for an employee only would be
$395 for a full time employee hired after 1994, so following this policy a work -life balance part -
time employee would receive $316 towards the cost of the medical coverage that they choose.
In 2013, the maximum the District would pay for medical insurance for an employee and family (2
dependents or more) would be $1,028.30 for a full time employee hired after 1994, so following
this policy a work -life balance part -time employee covering themselves and their family would
receive $822.64 towards the cost of the medical coverage that they choose.
Dental Insurance: District paid
Vision: District Paid
Life Insurance: District Paid $30,000 base coverage
Vacation: Work -life balance part -time employees accrue vacation hours at 80% of the rate of full -
time employees in the same position. Work -life balance part -time employees can accumulate
vacation hours up to two times the highest annual accrual rate that full -time employees in the
same position can earn. Once they reach their maximum accrual rate they stop earning vacation
hours until they bring their vacation hours below the maximum accrual rate. Work -life balance
employees may only cash out vacation hours upon separation from the District. Work -life balance
part -time employees transitioning from a full -time position with the District may either cash out
their vacation per their MOU or carry over their accrued vacation balance to the work -life balance
part -time position.
Sick Leave: Work -life balance part -time employees accrue 8 hours of sick leave per month. No
cash out or buyback of sick leave is provided to work -life balance part -time employees. Work -life
balance part -time employees transitioning from a full -time position with the District may either
cash out their sick leave per their MOU or carry over their accrued sick leave balance to the work -
life balance part -time position.
Page 3 of 4
PART -TIME EMPLOYEE BENEFITS SUMMARY
ADOPTED PER RESOLUTION 15 -027
DECEMBER 16, 2015
P31
Holidays: Work -life balance part -time employees will be compensated for normally scheduled
working hours, which fall on official District holidays. The District observes 11 holidays per year:
Independence Day, Labor Day, Veteran's Day, Thanksgiving Day and the day following,
Christmas Eve, Christmas Day, New Year's Day, Martin Luther King's Birthday, President's Day
and Memorial Day.
Deferred Compensation Plans: Work -life balance part -time employees are eligible to participate
in the District's deferred compensation plans. The District does not contribute.
_�� •lam_ 1 ••1LM • jJk_ A•Q M1 *kJnf1JTJ •• •
Effective July 1, 2015, all part -time employees earn and can use sick leave in accordance with
the District's Paid Sick Leave Policy, which is in agreement with California's Healthy
Workplaces /Healthy Families Act of 2014.
Medicare: Employees hired after 1/1/86, are required to contribute 1.45% of their earnings.
All Part -Time employees are subject to specific provisions of the Fire Districts Personnel Rules
and Regulations 11(c) and specific provisions of the Policy and Procedures Manual (Policy 200-
01) that apply to them.
Page 4 of 4
0%
PART -TIME EMPLOYEE UNIFORM BENEFITS
ADOPTED PER RESOLUTION NO. 15 -027
DECEMBER 16, 2015
The following part -time employee's uniform benefits are approved via resolution by the Board of
Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District effective January x, 2015.
The District may provide uniforms (including shirts) and /or maintenance of uniforms for the
following part -time positions: Communications Technician, Emergency Medical Services Quality
Improvement Nurse, Fire Clerk, Fire Equipment Mechanic, Fire Information Systems Technician,
Fire Prevention Assistant, Fire Prevention Specialist Inspection I, Management Aide,
Management Analyst I, Office Services Clerk, Office Specialist I, Office Specialist Il, Plans
Examiner— Fire, and Quality Improvement Specialist.
The District reports to CaIPERS on a semiannual basis the actual value of compensation paid or
the monetary value for the purchase, rental and /or maintenance of required clothing for part -time
CaIPERS Classic Members. The parties analyzed the value and determined it shall not exceed
$50.00 per fiscal year. The parties agree that to the extent permitted by law, this is special
compensation and shall be reported as such pursuant to Title 2 CCR, Section 571(a)(5) Statutory
Items. The parties also agree that the District has no additional obligation or costs should
CalPERS, the State, or the IRS determine otherwise.
,.
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES GROUP
Date: December 16, 2015
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
President and Members of the Board of Directors
John R. Gillison, City Manager
From: Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director, Department of Innovation and Technology
P33
Subject: APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT EXTENSION BETWEEN CALAMP RADIO
SATELLITE INTEGRATORS, INC. AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR
AUTOMATIC VEHICLE LOCATION (AVL) SYSTEM EXTENDED WARRANTY AND
WIRELESS FEES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $71,340
TO BE FUNDED FROM FIRE DISTRICT ACCOUNT NUMBERS 3281501 -5300 -
$4,830; 3282502 -5300 - $3,860; 3283501 -5300 - $970 AND FROM CITY VEHICLE
AND EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND ACCOUNT NUMBER 1712001 -5300
$61,680 ALL IN CONTRACT SERVICES.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the contract extension agreement between
CALAMP Radio Satellite Integrators, Inc. and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Automatic Vehicle
Location (AVL) System extended warranty and wireless fees for Fiscal Year 2015/16 in the total
amount of $71,340 to be funded from Fire District account numbers 3281501 -5300 - $4,830;
3282502 -5300 - $3,860; 3283501 -5300 - $970 and from City Vehicle and Equipment Replacement
Fund account number 1712001 -5300 - $61,680, all in contract services.
BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS:
In 2008, the City implemented a citywide integrated Automatic Vehicle Location (AVL) System to
enhance the ability to increase safety and productivity, efficiently monitor various city operations,
and improve service to citizens. Additionally, the AVL system maximizes effectiveness of
dispatching crews for various public works issues, enhances the City's ability to manage emergency
resources by locating and dispatching the nearest unit, and provides customized reports for
resource allocation and vehicle function monitoring (i.e. ignition, idling, alarms, sensors, etc.) which
can be archived or maintained as needed and later analyzed. The AVL system provides real -time
location and status data on customized AVL mapping utilizing the City's GIS map data and uses a
wireless gateway between the vehicle fleet and the base center for all City and Fire District non -
emergency vehicles, resulting in necessary monthly wireless fees.
Warranty on this system is necessary to maintain it full capabilities. Therefore, staff is
recommending that the warranty contract extension be approved for one year with the option to
renew annually for up to five years. CALAMP Radio Satellite Integrators, Inc. and the City of
Rancho Cucamonga may terminate this agreement upon providing thirty (30) calendar days' prior
written notice.
Respectfully submitted,
d
P34
STAFF REPORT
I'L. -kNNING DEPARTMENT
Date: December 16, 2015
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Chair and Members of the Board
John R. Gillison, City Manager
From: Linda Daniels, Assistant City Manager
By: Flavio Nunez, Management Analyst II
RANCHO
C,UCAMONGA
Subject: Review and approval of the Housing Successor's Fiscal Year 2014/15 Annual Report
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Housing Successor Agency approve the Annual Report for Fiscal Year
2014/2015, authorize staff to make administrative changes to the Annual Report upon completion of
the CAFR, and authorize the transmittal of the Annual Report to the appropriate State agencies.
BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS
Pursuant to SB 341 a Housing Successor Agency is required to file an Annual Report of its
activities within six months of the Agency's fiscal year end. This report is required to contain the
following information:
1. The amount deposited to the Low Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund ( LMIHAF),
distinguishing and amounts deposited for items listed on the ROPS.
2. A statement of the balance in the LMIHAF as the close of the fiscal year, distinguishing any
amounts held for items listed on the ROPS.
3. A description of expenditures from the LMIHAF by category, including, but not limited to
expenditures for (a) monitoring and preserving the long -term affordability of units subject to
affordability restrictions or covenants and administrative expenses; (b) homeless prevention
and rapid re- housing services; and (c) development of affordable housing.
4. The statutory value of real property owned by the housing successor, the value of loans and
grants receivable, and the sum of these two amounts.
5. A description of any transfers of LMIHAF funds made to another housing successor in the
previous fiscal year.
6. A description of any project for which the Housing Successor receives or holds property tax
revenue pursuant to the ROPS and the status of that project.
7. For interests in real property acquired by the former agency prior to February 1, 2012, a
status update on compliance with Section 33334.16. For interest in real property acquired
by the Housing Successor on or after February 1, 2012, a status update on the project.
P35
Ri3 \1ii3\\1 AND APPROVAL OF TI Iii HOUSING SUCCGSSOIt'S Fiscal, Y1.:Alt 2014/15 ANNUM, RI POIt'1' PAGFL, 2
8. A description of any outstanding obligation pursuant to Section 33413 that remained to
transfer to the Housing Successor on February 1, 2012, the Housing Successor's plans to
meet unmet obligations.
9. Housing Successor mush determine the % of housing for seniors and person of all ages
within the previous 10- years. Senior housing units may not exceed 50% of the total units
restricted.
10. The amount of excess surplus, the amount of time the Housing Successor has had excess
surplus, and the Housing Successor's plan for eliminating the excess surplus.
The Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2014/15 is being transmitted to the Housing Successor Agency
in accordance with the applicable legislation, and contains all of the required information as outlined
above. Following the approval by the Housing Successor, the report will be sent to the appropriate
State agencies for review.
The CAFR has been delivered to the City Council and is available to the public at the Archibald
Library, in the Paul A. Biane Library, in the office of the City Clerk, and has also been posted on the
City's website at www.cityofrc.us
Respectfully submitted,
Linda Daniels
Assistant City Manager
HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY ANNUAL REPORT
ti
fir_ 4 i
ti N�
Villaggio on Route 66 Affordable Housing Community — bRolicucamongo
1, r
P37
HOUSING SUCCESSOR ANNUAL REPORT- 2014/15
1.) The amount deposited to the LMIHAF, distinguishing any amounts deposited for items
listed on the ROPS
A total of $541,719 was deposited to the LMIHAF during Fiscal Year 2014/15. The
deposits primarily consisted of residual receipts associated with the payments on loans
related to the development of low and moderate income multi - family housing financed
by the former Redevelopment Agency, loan payoffs of first -time homebuyer loans, and
loan payoff of equity distributions.
2.) A statement of the balance in the LMIHAF as the close of the fiscal year, distinguishing
any amounts held for items listed on the BOPS.
As of the close of Fiscal Year 2014/15 the LMIHAF ended with a balance of
$124,943,671.
3.) A description of expenditures from the LMIHAF by category, including, but not limited
to, expenditures for (a) monitoring and preserving the long -term affordability of units
subject to affordability restrictions or covenants and administrative expenses; (b)
homeless prevention and rapid re- housing services; and (c) development of affordable
housing.
ACTIVITY
EXPENDITURE
Administrative Costs
-
Homeless Prevention
$100,656.00
Affordable Housing Development
$ 2,350,000.00
4.) The statutory value of real property owned by the Housing Successor, the value of loans and
grants receivable, and the sum of these two amounts.
LOAN NAME /DESCRIPTION /PROPERTY
ENDING BALANCE
FAIR VALUE OF LAND
SECURED BY LOAN
NHDC (San Sevaine Villas)
$ 9,039,503.00
N/A
Woodhaven Manor
$ 11,328,120.84
N/A
Villa Pacifica
$ 3,135,969.13
N/A
11
HOUSING SUCCESSOR ANNUAL REPORT- 2014/15
LINC - Pepperwood
$ 25,303,849.08
N/A
Rancho Verde Village East
$ 7,171,327.49
N/A
Heritage Pointe
$ 1,994,887.10
N/A
Olen Jones
$ 4,303,415.00
N/A
Villa Del Norte
$ 9,621,680.69
N/A
Villaggio on Route 66
$ 10,365,187.38
N/A
First -Time Homebuyer Program
$ 3,800,198.00
N/A
Total $ 86,064,137.71
5.) A description of any transfers of LMIHAF funds made to another Housing Successor in
the previous fiscal year.
There have been no transfers of LMIHAF funds to any other Housing Successor in the
previous fiscal year.
6.) A description of any project for which the housing successor receives or holds
property tax revenue pursuant to the ROPS and the status of that project.
There are no projects which the Housing Successor receives or holds property tax
revenue pursuant to the ROPS.
7.) For interests in real property acquired by the former agency prior to February 1, 2012,
a status update on compliance with Section 33334.16. For interest in real property
acquired by the Housing Successor on or after February 1, 2012, a status update on the
project.
In July 2014 the Housing Successor Agency acquired a 2.5 acre property for the purpose
of constructing a 60 -unit senior affordable rental housing complex. The project
affordability agreement provides for 59 of the 60 1 -and -2 bedroom units to be restricted
to income eligible seniors. The project has received all entitlement approvals submitted
for 9% tax credits in 2015 but did not receive an allocation. Per the Agreement, the
developer will submit again for tax credits in 2016 in order to receive the needed
funding to construct the project.
21
HOUSING SUCCESSOR ANNUAL REPORT— 2014/15
8.) A description of any outstanding obligation pursuant to Section 33413 that remained
to transfer to the housing successor on February 1, 2012, the Housing Successor's
progress in meeting these obligations, and the Housing Successor's plans to meet
unmet obligations.
There is no outstanding obligation that had been transferred to the Housing Successor
Agency on February 1, 2012.
9.) Housing Successor must determine the % of housing for seniors and persons of all ages
within the previous 10- years. Senior housing units may not exceed 50% of the total
units restricted.
Housing Projects Completed Within the Last 10 -years (2005 -2015)
PROJECT
San Sevaine
TYPE # OF UNITS
Family 223
Pepperwood Family 228
Villaggio on Rt. 66 Family 131
Total 582
[INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)
c
P39
PROJECT
Las Casitas
Rancho Verde
Rancho Verde East
Monterey Village
Sycamore Springs
Sunset Heights
Villa Pacifica
Heritage Pointe
Olen Jones
z 1
HOUSING SUCCESSOR ANNUAL REPORT— 2014/15
Previous Affordable Housing Accomplishments Prior to 2005
TYPE # OF UNITS
Family
Family
Family
Family
Family
Family
Senior
Senior
Senior
Total
104
40
110
96
116
158
48
96
782
10.) The amount of excess surplus, the amount of time the Housing Successor has
had excess surplus, and the Housing Successor's plan for eliminating the excess
surplus.
At the start of this reporting Fiscal Year the Housing Successor Agency opened with a
balance of $119,789,418.00. The Housing Successor has ended this reporting Fiscal
Year with no excess surplus.
T
2111 i
STAFF REPORT
1 10 :;.1SING SUCCESSOR AGENCY
RANCHO
Date: December 16, 2015 CUCAMONGA
To: Chairman and Members of the Housing Successor Agency
John R. Gillison, City Manager
From: Linda D. Daniels, Assistant City Manager
Subject: CONSIDERATON OF A CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE FOR THE
ACQUISITION OF AN APPROXIMATE 4 ACRE SITE GENERALLY LOCATED
NORTH OF BASE LINE ROAD AND WEST OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD
AND THE RECORDATION OF A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
AGREEMENT FOR SLOPE, DRAINAGE AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES ON
THE PROPERTY
RECOMMENDATION: Provide authority for the City Manager, or his designee, to execute
a Certificate of Acceptance for the acquisition of a 4 acre parcel that is planned for
affordable senior housing, to record a temporary construction easement for slope, drainage
and maintenance purposes on the property and, to direct staff to take all necessary actions
to complete the transfer of the 4 acre site to the Housing Successor Agency.
ANALYSIS: In September 2014 the Successor Agency entered into a Purchase and Sale
Agreement with a developer for the 14 acre site located at the northwest corner of Base
Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard. The Purchase and Sale Agreement was
subsequently approved by the Oversight Board and the Department of Finance.
The land transaction provided for the sale of a 14 acre site (see Exhibit A) with the intent
that 10 acres would be developed as a neighborhood commercial shopping center and 4
acres would be used to develop affordable senior housing. The buyer and developer,
WLPX Day Creek, LLC was allowed up to one year after the close of escrow to pursue an
affordable housing development. If the developer chose not to pursue the affordable
housing development within that one year time frame the 4 acre site was required to be
conveyed, at no cost, to the Housing Successor Agency.
The Developer has notified the Housing Successor Agency that it will not pursue an
affordable senior housing development for the 4 acre parcel and they are prepared to
convey the property to the Housing Successor Agency. In order for the land transfer to
proceed, the Housing Successor Agency must take action to approve a Certificate of
Acceptance (see Exhibit B) of the property and direct staff to take all necessary actions to
complete the conveyance of the property.
In addition to the Housing Successor Agency approving the Certificate of Acceptance for
the 4 acre site, the Developer has also indicated the need for temporary Construction
Easement Agreement for slope, drainage and maintenance purposes on the 4 acre
property. The Agreement will enable the Developer to move forward with the construction
of the commercial site prior to the construction of the housing development. The temporary
I IN
C13R'1'If ICA7'F'. OI-. ACCI,?.I''I'. \NCI- AND TI'si\'ll'Oltt \RY E. \SI-iN[I-N'I' — BAST- LINT AND DAY CR13E3K PAGE Z
DECEM131�R 16, ?015
easement would be maintained by the Developer and would be removed once the senior
housing development began and the permanent grading and drainage for the 4 acre
property was installed. The temporary easement is described on the attached Exhibits C
and D and staff requests authority to revise the Easement Agreement and prepare a final
legal description prior to its recordation on the 4 acre property that is to be conveyed.
Respectfully Submitted,
Linda D. Daniels
Assistant City Manager
Exhibit A — Property Location Map
Exhibit B — Certificate of Acceptance
Exhibit C — Map of Temporary Construction Easement for Slope, Drainage and
Maintenance purposes
Exhibit D — Form of Construction Easement Agreement
EXHIBIT "A"
DEPICTION OF COMMERCIAL PARCEL AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING PARCEL
wis Operating Corp.
a
P43
12803- 0001\1724697v2.doc
iiEA1
IM0.1IN1d11
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
(Govt. Code § 2728 1)
This is to certify that the real property located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San
Bernardino, State of California conveyed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as successor to the
housing assets of the former Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, by a Grant Deed from
WLPX Day Creek, LLC is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer or agent on behalf of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga in its capacity as such successor, pursuant to action of the City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga acting as successor to the housing assets of the former
Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency on December 16, 2015, and the grantee consents to
the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer.
Dated: December 17, 2015 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, as
successor to the housing assets of the former
Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency
A notary public or other officer
completing this certificate verifies only
the identity of the individual who signed
the document to which this certificate is
attached, and not the truthfulness,
accuracy, or validity of that document.
State of California
County of
On
By:
Print Name:
Title:
before me, ,
(insert name and title of the officer)
Notary Public, personally appeared
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is /are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he /she /they executed the same
in his /her /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his /her /their signature(s) on the instrument
the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that
the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature (Seal)
11231- 0001 \1810765vl.doc
jyj P45
Ln
U)tD
X
M
ol
1:__ -4
a
/H
1p
Lj
71
LLI
(0,
n' I
is
oa
rd
X
177
4L//
o
SS5XV 310JA3A AON30839j 31 - iW A ti
TM
tat r� vo�'- N
Ll
x
OD
, _I ' 111 y \ r\\ ," t �o � " `mss � `r��- 4'• 4� �' _ NF
O -
Ln
I It
XV
iL
le
9 t-La W
CL
S400V 3MJA3A ADN90M79 go.ninj L
X
—
` L j i;
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
WLPX DAY CREEK, LLC
c/o Lewis Operating Corp. (MAP)
1156 North Mountain Avenue
Upland, CA 91786 -3633
EX KI 51 T " D P47
(SPACE ABOVE THIS LiNE FOR RECORDER'S USE)
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AGREEMENT
This CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AGREEMENT ( "Agreement "), dated for reference purposes as of
December _, 2015 ( "Effective Date "), is made by and between between the CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, as successor agency to the RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
( "Grantor "), and WLPX DAY CREEK, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ( "Grantee "), Grantor
and Grantee,are referred to herein individually as a "Party ", and collectively as the "Parties ". This
Agreement is made with reference, in part, to the following relevant facts:
RECITALS
A. Grantee owns that certain real property ( "Grantee Property ") located in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga ( "City "), California, legally described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto, and generally
depicted on the "Map of the Grantor and Grantee Property" attached hereto as Exhibit "A-]".
B. Grantor owns that certain real property ( "Grantor Property ") located in the City, legally described
on E.rlribit "B" attached hereto, and generally depicted on Exhibit "A -I ".
C. Grantor elects to grant to the Grantee Property, a non- exclusive "Construction Easement"
appurtenant to the Grantee Property, over the "Construction Easement Area" (as these terms are
defined at Section I below) for ingress and egress necessary to perform the "Work" defined at
Section 2 below.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants exchanged below, and for other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1. Grant of Construction Easement. Grantor hereby grants to Grantee, and Grantee's successors
and assigns, effective upon the recordation of this Agreement in the Office of the San Bernarndino County
Recorder (the "Effective Date "), a non - exclusive easement ( "Construction Easement ") appurtenant to the
Grantee Property, over the "Construction Easement Area" (depicted at Exhibit "C" and legally described
at Exhibit "D ").
2. Work. The term "Work" means Grantee's entry on the Construction Easement Area, in
accordance with this Agreement, to (i) grade Grantor's property to create the slope ( "Slope ") in accordance
with an approved grading plan, (ii) install a storm water drain pipe ( "Storm Drain Pipe ") at the
m •
approximate location shown on Lvhibit C, and related drainage improvements, in order to connect the
Storm Drain Pipe to the storm drain system Grantee will install on the Grantee Property, and (ii) maintain
the Slope, Storm Drain Pipe, and the related storm drain improvements installed in the Construction
Easement Area. Grantee shall perform the Work (i) at Grantee's sole cost and expense, in a good and
workmanlike manner, and (ii) pursuant to a grading plan, storm drain building permit, and other similar
permits and plans approved by Grantor.
3. Improvements on Grantor Property. Grantor represents, warrants and covenants to Grantee that
(i) prior to commencing grading on the Grantor Property, and /or installation of any storm drain pipes,
detention basins, berms or other improvements (collectively and individually, the "Improvements ") that
could affect drainage of storm -water from the Grantor Property onto the Grantee Property, Grantor shall
deliver to Grantee, for Grantee's express written approval (which approval shall not be unreasonably
withheld, conditioned or delayed), any and all grading plans, drainage plans, construction drawings, and
any other plans and specifications relating to the Improvements, and (ii) upon Grantee's express written
approval of Grantor's grading plan, drainage plans and any other plans or specifications relating to
construction and installation of the Improvements, Grantor shall then commence construction and
installation of the Improvements.
4. Covenants to Run with the Land. All of the easements, covenants, restrictions, reservations,
rights and obligations of this Agreement shall run with and bind the Grantor Property, for the benefit of and
as an appurtenance to the Grantee Property, and inure to the benefit of, and be enforceable by, each Party,
and their assignees, and successors -in- interest. This Agreement and all of the terms, covenants and
conditions herein contained shall be enforceable as mutual equitable servitudes in favor of the Grantee
Property, and the Grantor Property, and any portion thereof, shall create rights and obligations as provided
herein between Grantor and Grantee, and shall be covenants running with the land. Every person who now
or in the future owns or acquires any right, title or interest in or to the Grantor Property, and /or the Grantee
Property, or any portion thereof, shall be conclusively deemed to have consented to and agreed to every
covenant, restriction, provision, condition and right contained in this Agreement whether or not the
instrument conveying such interest refers to this Agreement.
5. Term. Except as provided below, this Agreement and the easements, covenants and obligations
set forth herein shall continue in full force and effect until such time as Grantee confirms in writing that the
Improvements have been installed, and are functioning properly; thereafter, Grantee agrees to deliver a
written and acknowledged instrument to Grantor terminating this Agreement.
6. Insurance. Grantee shall obtain, and keep in effect, while this Agreement is an encumbrance on
the Grantor Property, general liability insurance insuring against bodily injury, death and property damage
in a combined single limit in amounts not less than Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00), covering
Grantee's, and Grantee's employees', agents', and contractors' entry on the Grantor Property. Grantee
shall, upon written request by Grantor, provide Grantor with a Certificate of Insurance or other verification
as evidence that the required insurance under this Section 6 is in effect, and an additional insured
endorsement naming Grantor as an additional insured.
7. Notices. All notices or other communications between the Parties required or permitted hereunder
shall be in writing and personally delivered, or sent by certified United States mail, postage prepaid, return
receipt requested, or sent via overnight air courier (example, Federal Express), or sent by telecopier, to the
following addresses:
PAI
=41
If to Grantor, to: Attention: Linda Daniels
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Dr.
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
If to Grantee, to: Attn: John Goodman
c/o Lewis Operating Corp.
P. O. Box 670
Upland, CA 91785 -0670
1156 North Mountain Avenue
Upland, CA 91786 -3633
Telecopier: (909) 949 -6733
With a copy to: Attn: Mario Pichardo
c/o Lewis Operating Corp.
P. O. Box 670
Upland, CA 91785 -0670
1156 North Mountain Avenue
Upland, CA 91786 -3633
Telecopier: (909) 949 -6733
A notice shall be effective on the date of personal delivery if personally delivered, the next business
day after deposit for next business day delivery with the overnight air courier, the same business day if sent
by telecopier (provided a copy is also mailed that same business day via first class mail), or two (2) business
days following the date the notice is postmarked, if mailed via certified mail as set forth above. Either Party
may change the address to which notice is to be given to it by giving notice of such change of address in
the manner set forth above for giving notice.
8. Integration. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the Parties with respect to the
subject matter hereof. It supersedes all prior or contemporaneous agreements and representations.
9. Amendments. This Agreement may be modified only by a recorded written agreement signed by
each Party, or their successors -in- interest.
10. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid or unenforceable, the
remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected and shall remain in frill force and effect.
If. Attorneys' Fees. In the event of any action or proceeding brought by any Party against the others
under this Agreement, inclusive of all appeals of any such actions or proceedings, the prevailing Party shall
be entitled to recover reasonable costs and expenses, including, without limitation, attorneys' fees, expert
witness fees, and court costs, incurred for prosecution, defense, consultation, or advice in such action or
proceeding.
12. Assignment. Neither Party may assign its rights and obligations under this Agreement without the
other Party's express written consent.
3
P50
13. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced under the laws
of the State of California. The courts of San Bernarndino County, California, shall have sole and exclusive
jurisdiction over any action or proceeding brought by any Party against the others under this Agreement.
14. WAIVER OF RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY. EACH PARTY TO THIS AGREEMENT
HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVES ANY RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY CLAIM, DEMAND,
ACTION, OR CAUSE OF ACTION (1) ARISING UNDER THISAGREEMENT, OR ANY OTHER
INSTRUMENT, DOCUMENT, OR AGREEMENT EXECUTED OR DELIVERED IN CONNECTION
THEREWITH, OR (2) IN ANY WAY CONNECTED WITH OR RELATED OR INCIDENTAL TO THE
DEALINGS OF THE PARTIES HERETO OR ANY OF THEM WITH RESPECT TO THIS
AGREEMENT OR ANY OTHER INSTRUMENT, DOCUMENT, OR AGREEMENT EXECUTED OR
DELIVERED IN CONNECTION HEREWITH, OR THE TRANSACTIONS RELATED HERETO OR
THERETO, IN EACH CASE WHETHER NOW EXISTING OR HEREAFTER ARISING, AND
WHETHER SOUNDING IN CONTRACT OR TORT OR OTHERWISE; AND EACH PARTY HEREBY
AGREES AND CONSENTS THAT ANY SUCH CLAIM, DEMAND, ACTION, OR CAUSE OF
ACTION SHALL BE DECIDED BY COURT TRIAL WITHOUT A JURY. THE PARTIES HERETO
HEREBY AGREE THAT THE PROVISIONS CONTAINED HEREIN HAVE BEEN FAIRLY
NEGOTIATED ON AN ARM'S- LENGTH BASIS, WITH BOTH SIDES AGREEING TO THE SAME
KNOWINGLY AND BEING AFFORDED THE OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE THEIR RESPECTIVE
LEGAL COUNSEL CONSENT TO THE MATTERS CONTAINED HEREIN. ANY PARTY TO THIS
AGREEMENT MAY FILE AN ORIGINAL COUNTERPART OR A COPY OF THIS SECTION WITH
ANY COURT AS WRITTEN EVIDENCE OF THE CONSENT OF THE PARTIES HERETO TO THE
WAIVER OF THEIR RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY.
Grantor's Initials Grantee's Initials
15. Breach Shall Not Permit Termination. No breach of this Agreement shall entitle any Party to
cancel, rescind, or otherwise terminate this Agreement, but such limitation shall not affect in any manner
any of the rights or remedies which the Parties may have by reason of any breach of this Agreement.
(THIS SECTION INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK — SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWSI
0
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the dates set forth below.
"Grantee"
WLPX DAY CREEK, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company
By: LEWIS OPERATING CORP.,
a California corporation
Its Sole Manager
By: _
Name:
Title:
Date:
LIST OF EXI-IIBITS:
"Grantor"
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, as successor
agency to the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment
Agency
By: _
Name:
Title:
Date:
WITNESS:
By:
Name:
Title: City Clerk
Date:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
Name:
Title: City Attorney
Date:
Exhibit A:
Legal Description of Grantee Property
Exhibit A -1:
Map of the Grantor and Grantee's Property
Exhibit B:
Legal Description of Grantor Property
Exhibit C:
Depiction of Easement Area
Exhibit D:
Legal Description of Easement Area
Y: \940\2015 \G2747 Day Creek Easement Agrmt MAP Draft (12- 9- 2015).doex
P51
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who
signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of
that document.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
ss.
COUNTY OF )
On before me, , Notary Public, personally
appeared , who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(s) whose name(s) is /are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that
he /she /they executed the same in his /her /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his /her /their signature(s)
on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the
instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing
paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature
u
(Seal)
P52
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who
signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of
that document.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
ss.
COUNTY OF )
On before me, , Notary Public, personally
appeared , who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(s) whose names) is /are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that
he /she /they executed the same in his /her /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his /her /their signature(s)
on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the
instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing
paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature
7
(Seal)
P53
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who
signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of
that document.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
ss.
COUNTY OF )
On before me, , Notary Public, personally
appeared , who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(s) whose name(s) is /are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that
he /she /they executed the same in his /her /their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his /her /their signature(s)
on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the
instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing
paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature
0
(Seal)
P54
P55
. ulI
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF GRANTEE PROPERTY
PARCEL "B"
THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEING PORTIONS OF LOTS 21 AND 22 OF ORANGE EMPIRE ACRES, AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 20, PAGE 1 OF MAPS, IN SAID OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER, TOGETHER WITH PARCEL 2 OF CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR
LOT LINE ADWSTMENT No. 619 RECORDED JUNE 14, 2006 AS INSTRUMENT No.
2006 - 0406609, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 21, SAID POINT BEING
SOUTH 00 012'36" WEST 575.70 FEET FROM THENORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT21;
THENCE, LEAVING SAID WEST LINE, NORTH 44-17-06" EAST 171.66 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89 017'07" EAST 195.07 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 42 024'52" EAST 51.92 FEET TO A POINT ON THE RIGHT -OF-
WAY LINE OF FIREHOUSE COURT, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF
A NON - TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS
OF 61.04 FEET, A RADIAL BEARING TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH
61 046'01" WEST;
THENCE, ALONG SAID RIGHT -OF -WAY AND CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 104 050'34" AN ARC LENGTH OF 111.70 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 47 033'50" EAST 81.58 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT
CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 96.00 FEET;
THENCE, ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 22 041'14" AN ARC
LENGTH OF 38.01 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A COMPOUND CURVE, HAVING A
RADIUS OF 267.00 FEET, A RADIAL BEARING TO SAID BEGINNING BEARS NORTH
19 044'56" WEST;
THENCE, ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 19 054'06" AN ARC
LENGTH OF 92.74 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89 050'50" EAST 18.51 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT -OF-
WAY LINE OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD;
P56
THENCE, ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE, SOUTH 46 °28'00" EAST 35.60
FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY
AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 2337.59 FEET, A RADIAL BEARING TO SAID
BEGINNING BEARS SOUTH 88 046'45" EAST;
THENCE, ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT -OF -WAY AND CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 02 044'07" AN ARC LENGTH OF 1 1 l .60 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 03 057'22" WEST 170.37 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE
CONCAVE WESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 208.70 FEET;
THENCE, ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10 °28'52" AN ARC
LENGTH OF 38.18 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE, CONCAVE
EASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 234.95 FEET, A RADIAL POINT TO SAID
BEGINNING BEARS SOUTH 75 033'46" EAST;
THENCE, ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12 °33'53" AN ARC
LENGTH OF 51.52 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A COMPOUND CURVE CONCAVE
EASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 2470.80 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID
BEGINNING BEARS NORTH 88 007'39" WEST;
THENCE, ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01'40'09" AN ARC
LENGTH OF 71.97 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00 °12'12" WEST 268.32 FEET;
THENCE, LEAVING SAID WEST RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE, SOUTH 43 °15'28" WEST 28.09
FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF BASELINE ROAD, SAID
POINT ALSO BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE
NORTHERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 7438.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT
BEARS SOUTH 03 °39'21" EAST;
THENCE, ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02 °01'03" AN ARC
LENGTH OF 261.90 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A COMPOUND CURVE CONCAVE
NORTHERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 2487.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID
BEGINNING BEARS SOUTH 01 °38'18" EAST;
THENCE, ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00 019'43" AN ARC
LENGTH OF 14.27 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 88 041'25" WEST 182.96 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE
CONCAVE NORTHERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 2487.00 FEET;
THENCE, ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01007-35" AN ARC
LENGTH OF 48.89 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89 049'00" WEST 115.81 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID
LOT 21;
10
P57
THENCE, LEAVING SAID NORTH RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE AND ALONG SAID WEST LINE,
NORTH 000 12'36" EAST 534.73 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
11
EXHIBIT A -1
MAP OF THE GRANTOR AND GRANTEE PROPERTY
12
P59
EXHIBIT B
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF GRANTOR PROPERTY
PARCEL "A"
THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEING PORTIONS OF LOTS 21 AND 22 OF ORANGE EMPIRE ACRES, AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 20, PAGE 1 OF MAPS, IN SAID OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER, TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF RAILROAD AVENUE SOUTH,
VACATED PER INSTRUMENT No. 92- 447926, RECORDED OCTOBER 28, 1992 OFFICIAL
RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, TOGETHER WITH PARCEL 2 OF CERTIFICATE OF
COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT No. 619 RECORDED JUNE 14, 2006 AS
INSTRUMENT No. 2006- 0406609, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 21, SAID POINT BEING
SOUTH 00 012'36" WEST 575.70 FEET FROM THENORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 21;
THENCE, ALONG SAID WEST LINE AND ITS NORTHERLY PROLONGATION, NORTH
00 012'36" EAST 615.70 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID INSTRUMENT
No. 92- 447926;
THENCE, ALONG THENORTH LINE OF SAID INSTRUMENTNo. 92- 447926, SOUTH
89 011'41" EAST342.01 FEETTOTHENORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID INSTRUMENTNo.
92- 447926, SAID CORNER ALSO BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF PARCEL 1
OF CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT No. 619
RECORDED JUNE 14, 2006 AS INSTRUMENT No. 2006- 0406609, OFFICIAL RECORDS
OF SAID COUNTY;
THENCE, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID INSTRUMENT No. 92- 447926 AND THE EAST
LINE OF SAID LOT 22, SOUTH 00 °12'48" WEST 418.19 FEET TO A POINT ON THE
WESTERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF FIREHOUSE COURT, SAID POINT BEING THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2 AND THE BEGINNING OF A NON - TANGENT
CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 61.04 FEET, A RADIAL
BEARING TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 89 °50'34" WEST;
THENCE, LEAVING SAID EAST LINE AND ALONG SAID RIGHT -OF -WAY, THROUGH
A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 28 023'25" AN ARC LENGTH OF 30.25 FEET;
THENCE, LEAVING SAID RIGHT -OF -WAY, SOUTH 42 °24'52" WEST 51.92
FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89'1 T07" WEST 195.07 FEET,
THENCE SOUTH 44 017'06" WEST 171.66 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
'•1
EXHIBIT C
DEPICTION OF EASEMENT AREA
P61
EXHIBIT D
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF EASEMENT AREA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
P62
AND
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Agenda Check Register
11/23/20 15 through 12/812015
Check No.
Check Date
Vendor Name
Ciov
Tire Amount
AP
00005638
1 112312015
AHUMADA, ALEXANDER R
0.00
904.08
904.08
AP
00005639
11/23`2015
ALMAND, LLOYD
0.00
615.52
615.52
All
00005640
1 1!23/2015
BANTAIJ, VICTORIA
0.00
949.95
949.95
All
00005641
11/2/2015
BAZAL, SUSAN
0.00
969.50
969.50
All
00005642
1 1/23/2015
BELL, MICIIAEI, L.
0.00
1,560.49
1,560.49
All
00005643
11 /23 /2015
BERRY, DAVID
0.00
920.36
920.36
AP
00005644
11/2312015
BROCK, ROBIN
0.00
893.87
893.87
All
00005645
1 112312015
CAMPBELL, GERALD
0.00
1,233.07
1,233.07
All
00005646
111/23!2015
CARNES, KL;NNETH
0.00
469.02
469.02
AP
00005647
1 LI23/2015
CLABBY, RICHARD
0.00
920.36
920.36
All
00005648
11/23/2015
CORCORAN, ROBERT
0.00
525.11
525.11
All
00005649
11/23/2015
COX, KARL
0.00
615.52
615.52
All
00005650
11/23/2015
CRANE, RALPH
0.00
969.50
969.50
All
00005651
11123/2015
CROSSLAND, WILBUR
0.00
469.02
469.02
All
00005652
11/23/2015
DAGUE, JAMES
0.00
1,172.22
1,172.22
AP
00005653
11/23/2015
DE ANTONIO, SUSAN/
0.00
525.11
525.11
AP
00005654
1 1/2312015
DEANS, JACKIE
0.00
600.74
600.74
All
00005655
1 1/23/2015
DOMINICK, SAMUEL A.
0.00
893.87
893.87
AP
00005656
11!23/2015
EAGLFSON, MICHAEL
0.00
1,172.22
1,172.22
All
00005657
11/23/2015
FRITCHEY.JOHN D.
0.00
469.02
469.02
AI'
00005658
11/23/2015
1IEYD@, DONALD
0.00
1,172.22
1.17'_.22
All
00005659
1 1!231/2015
IN ITRI,IC;CI -IIA. ROSALYN
0.00
1,208.82
1,208.82
A['
00005660
11/23'2015
KILMFR, STE1)11EN
0.00
1,233.07
123107
All
00005661
11/23/2015
LAN!',, WILLIAM
0.00
1,560.49
1,560.49
AP
00005662
11/23/2015
LEE, ALLAN J.
0.00
1,066.80
1,066.80
AP
00005663
11/23/2015
LENZE, PAUL E
0.00
1,224.46
1,224.46
All
00005664
11/23/2015
LONGO, JOE
0.00
173.51
173.51
All
00005665
11/2-3/2015
LUTTRULL,, DARRELL
0.00
694.69
694.69
AI'
00005666
11/23/2015
MACKAI_l -, BENJAMIN
0.00
1,215.87
1,215.87
All
00005667
11/23%2015
MAYFIEL.D, RON
0.00
1,323.48
1,323.48
All
00005668
111/23/2015
MCKEE, JOHN
0.00
615.52
615.52
All
00005669
1 1,2312015
MCNEIL, KENNETI I
0.00
61552
615.52
AP
00005670
11/23/2015
MICHAEL, L. DENNIS
0.00
893.87
893.87
AP
00005671
11/23/2015
MORGAN, BYRON
0.00
2,277.23
2,27T23
All
00005672
11/23/2015
MYSKOW, DENNIS
0.00
920.36
92036
AP
00005673
11,23/2015
NAUMAN, MICHAEL
0.00
920.36
920.36
All
00005674
11123 /2015
NEE. RON
0.00
1,757.12
1,757.12
All
00005675
11/23/2015
NELSON, MARY JANE
0.00
173.51
173.51
All
00005676
11/2312015
PLOUNG, MICHAEL J
0.00
556.94
556.94
AP
00005677
11/23/2015
POST, MICHAEL R
0.00
1,577.31
1,577.31
All
00005678
11/23/2015
PROULX, PATRICK
0.00
1,560.49
1,560.49
AP
00005679
11/23/2015
ROEDER, JEFF
0.00
1,172.22
1,172.22
All
00005680
11123/2015
SALISBURY, THOMAS
0.00
615.52
615.52
AP
00005681
1 1 ?23/2015
SMITH, RONALD
0.00
920.36
920.36
AP
00005682
1 1/23;2015
SPAGNOLO, SAM
0.00
469.02
469.02
AP
00005683
11123/2015
SPAIN, WILLIAM
0.00
694.69
694.69
AP
00005684
11/23/2015
SULLIVAN, JAMES
0.00
753.31
753.31
User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA
LOPEZ Page: 1
Current Date:
12/09/2015
Report; CK
AGENDA _REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED
- CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I
Time:
14:57:12
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P63
AND
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Agenda Check Register
11 /23/2015 through 121812015
Cheek No. Check Date Vendor Name Citv Fire Amount
AP
00005685
11/23/2015
TAYLOR, STEVE
0.00
1,224.46
1,224.46
AP
00005686
1112312015
TULEY,TERRY
0.00
1,172.22
L17122
All
00005687
1112312015
VANDERKALLEN, FRANCIS
000
904,08
904.08
AP
00005688
11,;23,'2015
WALTON. KEVIN
0.00
1,233.07
1,233.07
AP
00005689
1112312015
YOWI-1 I,. TIMOTHY A
0.00
1,323.48
1,323.48
AP
00005690
11125112015
CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA /RANCHO CUCAMONGA
9,845.00
0.00
9,845.00
AP
00005691
11/2512015
141) PRODUCTIONS LLC
10,000.00
0.00
10.000.00
AP
00005692
11/25/2015
RCCEA
1,353.00
0.00
1,353.00
AP
00005693
11/25/2015
RCPFA
10,542.95
0.00
10,54295
AP
00005694
11/25 /2015
SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT
2,601,627.16
0.00
1601,627.16
AP
00005695
11/2512015
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC POWER AUTHORITY
901.20
0.00
901.20
AP
00005696
11/25/2015
VIASYN INC
1,665.00
0.00
1,665.00
All
00005697
12!02/2015
FORTISTAR METHANE GROUP LLC
106,496.03
0.00
106,496.03
All
00364109
1 1/23!2015
CURATAL0, JAMES
0.00
1,560.49
1,560.49
All
003641 10
11/231/2015
LONCAR, PHILIP
0.00
920.36
920.36
All
003641 1 1
1112312015
TOWNSEND. JAMES
0.00
1,560.49
1,560A9
All
00364112
11/2312015
WALKER, KENNETII
0.00
246.76
246.76
AP
003641 13
11/25/2015
A'JONTUE, ROSE ANN
336.00
0.00
336.00
All
003641 14
11/25/2015
ACCELA INC
7,207.55
0.00
7,207.55
All
003641 115
111,125/2015
AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE
79.40
0.00
79.40
AP
0036-1116
1 1/25/2015
AGILINE LLC
700.00
0.00
700.00
,\P
00364117
1 1125,2015
ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC.
21,378.04
0.00
21,378.04
AP
00364118
1 1125 /2015
ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC,
285.00
0.00
285.00
AP
00364119
1 1/25 %2015
AI;hA LOMA COMMUNITY BAPTIST CHURCH
90.00
0.00
90.00
AP
0036 -1120
11;2512015
AROCI10, At MA
765.00
0.00
765.00
AP
00364121
1 1252015
ASS(S IANCI. f //.AGUE OF FOOTHILL COMMUNITIIIS
2,148.00
0.00
1148.00
AP
00364122
11!25112015
AVAN °FS, MARG1:
225.00
0.00
225.00
AP
00364 123
111/25112015
110 UCHPR. No I 3
500.00
0.00
500.00
AP
00364124
11/25.2015
C& R FARMS
36.00
0.00
36.00
AP
00364125
1 U25/2015
CALIFORNIA FRANCIIISETAX BOARD
200.00
0.00
200.00
AP
00364126
1 1/25,2015
CALIFORNIA FRANC/ IISE TAX BOARD
300.00
0.00
300.00
AP
00364127
1 1/25 /2015
CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
1,048.11
0.00
1,048.11
All
00364128
1 1/25/2015
CARTY. DIANE
491.40
0.00
491.40
All
00364129
1//2512015
CIRIACKS, VALERIE ANN
120.00
0.00
120.00
AI'
00364130
11/25/2015
CLARK, KAREN
1,251.00
0.00
1,251.00
All
00364131
11125/2015
CLEARWATER GRAPHICS INC
27,335.54
0.00
27,335.54
AP
00364132
11/25/2015
CLEARWATER GRAPI TICS INC
48.14
0.00
48.14
AP
00364133
111/25/2015
COMP U ZONE
357.60
0.00
357.60
All
00364134
1 112512015
COUTURE, FRANCOIS- PIERRE
833.00
0.00
833.00
AP
00364135
11/25/2015
CPRS
165.00
0.00
165.00
AP
00364136
1 1%25/2015
DANCE TERRIFIC
2,009.00
0.00
2,009.00
All
003641 37
11/251/2015
DEAN, ADAM
135.00
0.00
135.00
AP
00364138
1 1;251'_015
DOLLARFIIDE, GINGER
156.00
0.00
156.00
AP
00364139
11125/2015
DUNK ANN MARIE
1,27620
0.00
1,276.'-_0
All
003641-10
1 1 ?2512015
EAS 1ERLING. RAY
249.60
0.00
249.60
:1P
00364141
11'25%2015
ERICKSON HALL CONSTRUCTION
0.00
19,125.00
19,125.00
At'
00364142
1 125 /2015
FELICIANO, ANTHONY
144.00
0.00
144.00
User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 2 Current Date: 12/09/2015
T2eport. CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait t Time: 14:57:12
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P64
AND
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Agenda Check Rellistei
11/23/2015 through 1218/2015
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City 1, ire Amount
AP
00364143
11/2512015
FIESTA PARADE FLOATS
7,530.00
0.00
7,530.00
AI'
00364144
11!2512015
FOUR POINTS BY SHERATON
489.12
0.00
489,12
AI'
00364145
11/2512015
G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS
104.66
0.00
104.66
AI'
00364146
11/25/2015
GILBEIRT. VELMA
275.00
0.00
275.00
AP
00364147
1 1 `25'0015
GIORDANO. MARIANNA
14.40
0.00
14.40
AP
0036 -1148
1 1/25 /2015
GOLDEN STATE RISK MANAGEMENT AU 'FIiORITY
105,279.00
1,150.00
106,429.00 * **
AI'
00' 64 1-19
11;25'2015
GRAINGER
6,53
0.00
6,53
AP
00364150
11/2512015
GRAPHICS FACTORY INC.
468.50
0,00
`168.50
AP
00364151
11;2512015
1IAMILTON, MONIQUF
960.00
0.00
960.00
All
00364152
1 1/25/2015
HAMPTON YOGA
648.00
0.00
648.00
AP
00364153
1 1%25/2015
1IERITAGE EDUCATION GROUP
20.00
0.00
20.00
All
00364154
11/25;2015
HILI:S PETNUTRITION
428.54
0.00
428.54
AP
00364155
11/25/12015
IATSE NATIONAL HEALTI I & WELFARE FUNDS
900.00
0.00
900.00
All
00364156
l 1/25/2015
IDEXX DISTRIBUTION INC
1,711.25
0.00
1,71125
AP
00364157
11/25/2015
INLAND EMPIRE "FOURS AND TRANSPORTATION
1,070.50
0.00
1,070.50
AP
00364158
11/2512015
INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION BOARD
1,35095
0.00
1,350.95
AI'
00364159
1 1/25/2015
INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES
73.05
0.00
73.05
AP
00364160
111/25/2015
INLAND VALLEY EMERGENCY PET CLINIC
215.00
0.00
215.00
AP
00364161
1 ]/2 5 0 15
J AND S S IRIPING CO INC
2.630.54
0.00
2,630.54
All
00364162
111/25/2015
JACOBSEN DIVISION OF TEXTRON INC
254.85
0.00
254.85
AP
00364163
11/25 /2015
JOBS AVAILABLE INC
45.00
0.00
45.00
Al'
00364164
1 1/25/2015
JONES, CHRISTINA FIAATAINEN
833.00
0.00
833.00
AP
00364165
11/25/2015
K K WOODWORKING
21.58
0.00
21.58
Al'
00364166
1 1/25/2015
L S A ASSOCIATES INC
0.00
389,16
389.16
AP
00361167
11/25/2015
LANCE SOLI, AND LUNGFIARD
4,780.00
0.00
1,780.00
AP
0036 -1168
1 1/252015
LAWSON PRODUCTS INC
0.00
433.99
433.99
A1'
0004169
1 1- 25'2015
LLAGi11? OF CALIFORNIA CITIES
280.00
0.00
280.00
AP
0036 =1170
1 l7/_ 5/201 5
I.EWIS 1NV1 STMFNT COMPANY L.LC
180,930.97
0.00
180,930.97
AP
0030.1171
11 25/2015
1.ICII' I'M AN. 0FER
0.00
261.00
261.00
All
00364172
1 125/2015
LIl TI,i. BF,AR PRODUCTIONS
4,400.00
0.00
4,400.00
AP
00364173
1 125/2015
LUBRICATION ENGINEERS INC
0.00
3 X19628
3,496.28
AP
00364174
1 12512015
MADRONE & ARROW I.I,C
10.60
0.00
10.60
AP
00364175
11;25'2015
MARK CIIRISTOPHERINC'
0.00
200.45
200.45
All
00364176
1 1`25/2015
MARSHALL, SYLVIA
1- 408.80
0.00
1,408.80
AP
00364177
11125/2015
MARTINFZTOWING
45.00
0.00
45.00
AP
00364178
1 1/25;2015
MARY S ROBERTS SPAY/NL'UTER CLINIC
100.00
0.00
100.00
AP
0036417/ 9
11/251/2015
MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY
24427
0.00
244.27
AP
00364180
1 1,25112015
MICI IAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL INC
21.377.50
0.00
21.377.50
AP
00364181
1 1/25/2015
MIDWEST TAPE
609.73
0.00
609.73
AP
00364182
11/2512015
MIJAC ALARM COMPANY
190.00
0.00
190.00
AP
00364183
11/25/2015
MISSION REPROGRAPHICS
566.42
0.00
566.42
AP
00364184
1 1/25/2015
MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC US INC
638.2 -1
0.00
638.24
All
00364185
11/25/2015
MK AUTO DE FAIL INC
0.00
225.00
225.00
AP
00364186
11,25/2015
MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL, ENG REPAIR
5188
0.00
52.88
All
00364187
11/25/201-5
MSA INLAND EMPIRE. /DESERT CLIALITER
240.00
0.00
240,00
Al'
00364188
11/2512015
N F P A
0.00
175.00
175.00
AP
00164189
11/25;2015
NAIOP
700.00
0.00
700.00
User: A'LOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 3 Current Date, 12/09/2015
Report: CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 14:57:12
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P65
AND
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
AV,enda Check RelZister
1 1/23/20 15 through 12/8120 15
Check No.
Check Date
Vendor Name
City
Fire Amount
AP
00364190
11/25/2015
NAPA AUTO PARTS
20.39
0.00
20.39
AP
00364191
1 1/25 {2015
NATIONAL DATA & SURVEYING SERVICES
192.00
0.00
19100
All
00364192
t 1125/2015
NEOPOST USA INC
122.26
0.00
122.26
AP
00364193
1 1/25;2015
NEW IMAGE COMMERCIAL FLOORING
0.00
4,496.78
4,496.78
AP
00364194
111/251,12015
NORSTAR INDUSTRIES
543.31
0.00
543.31
AP
00364195
1 1/25/2015
NOTARO, JEFF
39.77
0.00
39.77
All
00364196
1 1/25 /2015
0 ENTERTAINMENT
2,127.00
0.00
2,127.00
AP
00364197
1 1;25/2015
013RIEN. TF10MAS
0.00
261.00
261.00
A1'
00364198
1 1/25//2015
O'DONNELL BATTERIES
1,705.00
0.00
1,705.00
AP
00364199
11/25;2015
OFFICF, DEPOT
6344.56
0.00
6,344.56
AP
00364200
1 1/25/2015
OMNITRANS
1176,58
0.00
1176. 58
AP
00364201
111251/2015
ONTARIO WINNELSON CO
42836
0.00
428.36
A1'
00364202
11/25/2015
ONTRAC
147.34
0.00
147.34
All
00364203
11/25/2015
OPARC
396.00
0.00
396.00
All
00364204
11/25;2015
ORUNA, PATRICIA
1,620.00
0.00
1.620.00
AP
00364205
11/25/2015
OTT, LAURA
549.00
0.00
549.00
;A1'
003114206
11/25/2015
OTT, SHARON
522.00
0.00
52100
AP
00364207
1 1/25/2015
PAI, CAMPAIGN
10.00
0.00
10.00
A1'
0036 -1208
11125/'2015
PARS
7,000.00
0.00
7000,00
AP
0036.1209
11/25/2015
PASMA
75.00
0.00
75.00
AP
00364210
11,12512015
PEREZ, ALEXANDRA
147.00
0.00
147.00
AP
0036421 1
11/25,12015
PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS
52.99
0.00
52.99
AP
0036LI212
1 1/25/2015
PIONEER MANUFACTURING
18186
0.00
183.86
Al'
00364213
1 1/25/2015
POLICE EXECUTIVE RESEARCH FORUM
200.00
0.00
200.00
All
0036421 -1
111/25/2015
POWER PLAY YOUTH ATHLETICS
1,024.00
0.00
1,024.00
AP
00361215
1 1/25/2015
PIL`-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC
96.59
0.00
96.59
AP
00364216
1 1,25/201>
PRO SPRAY 13QUIPMENT
8.66
0.00
8.66
AP
0036 =1217
1 1;25,,2015
PPZ0,lFC'T SISTER FAMILY SERVICES
703.18
0.00
70318
AP
0036.1218
1 1125!2015
RAINI`-Y. L.A I RLAC F�
410,00
0.00
410,00
AP
00364219
1 1 `25/2015
IZALPI I ANDFRSEN & ASSOCIATI S
11500.00
0.00
11500.00
AP
00364220
1 /25/2015
RAMIRLZ, GABRIFI, FUFNTI,,S
6098
0.00
60.98
Al'
0036 -1221
1 1;_'5`2015
RANCI10 CUCAMONGA CIfAMBI R OF COMMER('(=
3.16( 66
0.00
3.166.66
All
00364222
1 1`25 %2015
RANCTIO (1 ICAMONGA FONTANA FAMILY YMCA
7160.40
0.00
7160.40
AP
0036 -1223
1 1,252015
1:ANC`l10 REGIONAL VETERINARY I IOSPTTAt, INC
675.00
0.00
675.00
All
00364224
1 1r -25/2015
R.ANCt10 REGIONAL VETERINARY IfOSPIT"AL INC'
474.81
0.00
474.81
AP
0036-1225
l 1r ?5 /2015
RIGELMAN FNCARNACION ONTIVEIZOS
60.00
0.00
60.00
Al'
00364226
11,25 2015
1110"1 I, MICHLLIT
300.00
0.00
300,00
All
00364227
1 If25 /2015
SAFEWAY SIGN COMPANY
2.176.09
0,00
2.17609
AP
00364228
1 1'25/2015
SAN ANTONIO HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
3,716.00
0,00
3,716.00
All
00364229
11/25 %2015
SAN BFRNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS Dl/P "I'
242.28
0.00
24228
At'
00364230
1 1,25/2015
SAN BFRNARDINO. CITY" OF
1,011.82
0.00
1,011,82
All
00364231
11 25/2015
SARGENT TOWN PLANNING INC
179,279M9
0.00
179,279.09
11'
00364232
11 25 /2015
Sl3PEA
1.043.54
0.00
1,043.54
All
00364233
11/25/2015
SC FUELS
18,092.42
5,81730
23,909.72 * **
All
00364234
1 1/25/2015
SENECIIAL, CALVIN
445.20
0.00
445,20
All
00364235
11/25/2015
SEXTON, SHEILA
5.00
0.00
5.00
All
00363236
1 1;25/2015
SI-IFR1FFS COURT SERVICES
296.59
0.00
296.59
User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 4
Current Date:
12/09/2015
Report. CK
AGiENDA,
REG PORTRAIT
CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register
Portrait 1
Time:
14:57:12
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
P66
AND
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Agenda Check Register
11%23/2015 through 12,18,/2015
Check No.
Check Date
Vendor Name
City
Fire Amount
All
00364237
1 1/2512015
SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES
93.38
0.00
93.38
All
()0364238
1 1'25'2015
SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES
200.00
0.00
200.00
All
00364239
1 1/25`2015
SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC
45,412.57
0.00
45,412.57
All
00364240
1 1/252015
SMITI1. JAYMI LEE
833.00
0.00
83100
AP
00364241
11/251/2015
SO CAI, SANDBAGS
3,240.00
0.00
3,240.00
AP
00364242
11/25/2015
SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
20.36
449.74
470.10 * **
AP
00364243
1 1'2512015
SOUI'1IERN CALIF FLEET SERVICES INC
0.00
1,869.35
1,869.35
AP
00364245
1 112512015
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
12,939.60
0.00
11939.60
All
00364246
11 %25'/2015
ST GEORGE GROUPE INC
3,873.67
0.00
3,873.67
AP
00364247
11/25!2015
STOTZ EQUIPMENT
158.59
0.00
158.59
AP
003642 -18
111/25,12015
SUNGARL) Pt.IBL IC SECTOR USER GROUP ASSOC' INC
195.00
0.00
195.00
iP
00364249
1 1/25x'2015
TERIZA VISTA ANIMAL I IOSPITAL
50.00
0.00
50.00
AP
00364250
1 1/25/2015
TI IF COUNSELING TEAM INTERNATIONAL
0.00
600.00
600.00
All
00364251
1 1;251/2015
T'RACEY, VAL
375.00
0.00
375.00
AP
00364252
11!25/2015
TRAK ENGINEERING INC:
2,381.45
0.09
2381.45
AP
00 64253
1 1/25/2015
UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC
20,882.00
0.00
20.882.00
AP
00364254
1 1/252015
UN IT11) ROTARY BRUSII CORPORATION
687.69
0.00
687.69
AP
00364255
1 1 25;2015
[`Ni LLD SCENI(: AR LISTS PENSION AND WFLF'AIZE i'1/
600.00
0.00
600.00
AP
06164256
1 1,252015
UNITH) SITE S1- 'RVI('ES OF CA INC
225.91
0.00
225.91
AI'
00364257
11//25/2015
UNI'l I'1) WAY
157.00
0.00
157.00
AP
00364258
11 %25;2015
['PS
32L69
0.0O
321.69
AP
0036 -1259
11 2512015
UhII,IQUE;S'1`
814.90
0.00
81 -1.90
AP
00364260
1 1'25/2015
VC:A CEN'LRA1, ANIMAL HOSPITAL.
50.97
0.00
5097
AP
00364261
1 1'_5/2015
VECCI110. TOM
22 9. 00
0.00
229.00
All
003611262
1 1 /25/2015
VICTOR MEDICAL, COMPANY
164.47
0.00
164.47
AP
00364263
11/25/2015
VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL
325.00
0.00
325.00
AP
00364264
1 1%25/2015
VISION COMMUNICATIONS CO
360.00
0.00
360.00
AP
0036-1265
11/25/2015
VORTEX INDUSTRIES INC
0.00
1,041.90
1,041.90
AP
00364266
11/251-)015
WAFII; SANITARY SUPPLY
2,949.87
1,818.12
4,767.99 * **
AP
0036.12167
1 1/25/2015
WI -S "1 RUX IN "FERNA "I'IONAl. INC
0.00
122.50
122.50
AP
00364368
1 1,2512015
WR1CH IT. CI IRIS
42.59
0.00
42.59
,1P
0<0364271
1 1/25/2015
XEROX CORPORATION
9,891.45
438.58
10330.03 * **
�P
11036,1272
1 1 25`2015
XL STORAGk
895.00
0.00
895.00
AP
00364273
11 25 2015
ZFF MEDICAL INC
753.70
0.00
753.70
All
0036427 -1
1 112512015
/FP MANUFAC "I URING COMPANY
0.00
209.93
209.93
Al'
00 6 -1275
1 /,25/2015
ABC LOCKSMITHS
9 17. 62
0.00
917.62
AP
0036.1276
1125`2015
AIRGAS LISA I.LC'
359.86
0.00
359.86
AI'
00.50 -1278
1 1;25/2015
C.` V W D
22,301.68
1.595.96
2.5.897.64 * **
All
130364279
11'25'/2015
CAI SFNSF.
2.640.12
0.00
2,640.12
+:I
0036-128 %)
1 1 25;2015
CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC
0.00
1.060.35
1.06%0.35
All
00364281
1 1,2512015
DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION
1,089.73
0.00
1,089.73
AP
006-1282
1 1,22512015
EMCOR SERVICI
25.529.18
0.00
25,529.18
AP
00364283
11:25/2015
SWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS
762.23
0.00
762.23
AP
00364284
1 1,1/2512015
FASTENAL COMPANY
6.05
0.00
6.05
All
017364285
11'25/2015
1IOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC
12,840.11
0.00
12,840,11
All
00364286
1 1/25/2015
HYDRO SCAPE PRODUCTS IN C
3,270.66
0.00
3,270.66
All
00364287
1 1/25,'2015
IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC
2,408.93
0.00
2,408.93
_ -
User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA
LOPEZ Page: 5
Current Date;
12/09/2015
IZcport: CK
AGENDA
REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait
I
Time:
14:57:12
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P67
AND
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
A14enda Check Register
I 1 /23%2015 through 12/8'2015
Check No.
Check Date
Vendor Name
Cite
Tire
Arnount
All
00364288
l 1,/25%2015
1NTF.RSTA I'l" BA4 AERIES
0.00
458.18
158.18
All
00364289
1 1/2512015
KM I? FIRF APPARA'Tl1S
0.00
5/16,26
546.26
AP
00364290
11125;2015
LIMS At 10 INC
2,766.20
01.00
1766.20
AP
00364291
11/2512015
PENNY PLUMBING
855.67
0.00
855.67
A1''
00364292
12"02!2015
35 DI-ZIGNZ
216.00
0.00
216.00
AP
00364293
12,10212015
A AND R TIRE SERVICE
84,84
0.00
84.84
All
00364294
121/02!2015
A &V SOFTBALL.
7,938,00
0.00
7,938.00
All
00364295
12/02,•'2015
ACEY DECY EQl'IPMENT INC.
211.80
0.00
211.80
All
00364296
12/02/2015
ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL
350.00
0.00
350.00
All
00364297
12/021/2015
AESS
0.00
25.00
25.00
All
00364298
12102/2015
ALL C HFS TOOLS
0.00
25.00
25.00
All
00364299
12/02/2015
ALLIED STORAGE CONTAINERS
0.00
75.60
75.60
AP
00361300
12/02/2015
ALPIIAGRAPIIICS
22.68
0.00
2L68
AP
00364301
12/02/2015
ALTA LOMA ANIMAL I IOSPITAL
1,000.00
0.00
1.000.00
AP
00364302
1210212015
ALFA RANCHO PEI HOSPITAL
150.00
0.00
150.00
AP
00364303
12/02,'2015
ARCNIBALD PCT HOSPITAL
450.00
(MM
450.00
AP
00364304
12;0212015
ARCIIITE,RRA DESIGN GROUP
4,876.25
1,132.50
6,008.75 * **
AP
00364305
12:02,`2015
ARENAS, II Fl, I N
14.00
0.00
14.00
AP
00364306
12102"2015
ASKARZOL KHAN
7.98
0.00
7.98
AP
OW64307
12102`2015
At TBAU CORPORATION
36 „642.00
0,00
36.642.00
AP
0036 -4308
12'02`2(}15
At 1'10 AND RV SPFCIALIS`1'S INC.
03.81
0.00
93.81
AI'
0036 -1309
12%02,2015
AYAN IRA INC.
1496.00
1,536.00
4,032.00 * **
All
0036-1310
1-) 022015
BALL, ROB/ RT
0.00
32,92
3292
AP
00364311
12"022015
BARNIiAR 'l, BRIAN "THOMAS
1,500.00
0.00
1,500.00
AI'
00361312
120212015
BARRAGAN,MARCOS
0,00
261.00
261.00
AI'
00364313
12/02/2015
13ASI,I..INE ANIMAL HOSPITAL
900.00
0.00
900.00
AP
00364314
12/02/2015
BATTERY POWER INC
177.30
0.00
177.30
AP
00364315
12102/2015
BEMB1, ARMIDA
10200
0.00
102.00
All
00364316
12-` `02;2015
BMI' SOLUTIONS
4,690,00
0.00
4,690.00
,,NP
00364317
12102/2015
BROWN, 1ENNIPBR
15,00
0.00
15.00
AP
0036 -1318
12102r2015
CABLI :INC,
589.50
0.00
589.50
AP
0036 -1319
12;02/_2015
C'AI. S I`A`T[ SYFF SERVICE'S
3.378.50
0.00
3.378.50
AP
00364320
12;02/2015
CALM)
210.00
0.00
210.00
AP
00364321
12/0212015
CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY
59.67
0.00
59,67
AP
00364322
12'02%2015
CARQUIEST AUTO PARTS
0.00
741-15
741.15
AP
00364323
12;02/2015
CCS ORANGE COUNTY JANITORIAL INC.
0.00
1,120M
1,120.00
All
00364324
12,'0212015
CDW GOVERNMENT INC.
2,491.37
0.00
2,491.37
AP
00364325
12/02 =2015
CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALTIES
48.60
0.00
48.60
AP
00364326
12/02;2015
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS
0.00
818,53
818.53
P
00364327
12102;2015
CHINO M0WFR AND ENGINE SERVICE
0.00
31.30
31.30
All
00364328
11022015
CLARK SEIF CLARK INC.
0.00
2,358.40
2,358.40
AP
00364 329
12/02/2015
CLARKF PLUMBING SPECIALi'fES INC.
1,309.26
0.00
1.309.26
1N
00364.7;0
12:0? 2015
CLIMA TFC H -C
5.47 -1.75
0.00
5.47 4.75
AP
00364331
12!02'2015
CLINE. LAURA
300.00
0.00
300.00
M
003643:,2
12/02/2015
CONCEPT POWDER COATING
265,00
0.00
265.00
AP
00364333
12/02!2015
CONCEPTUAL SITE FURNISHINGS INC.
8,369.52
0.00
8,369.52
AP
00364334
12102;2015
CRIME SCENE STERI -CLEAN LLC
540.00
0.00
540.00
User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 6
Current Date:
12/09/2015
Report: CK
AGEN
DAR EG_PORTRAIT "CON SOLI DATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I
Time:
14:57:12
CITY OF IZANCI-10 CUCAMONGA
P68
AND
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE, PROTECTION
DISTRICT
Agenda Check Register
11/23/2015 through 12/8/2015
Check No.
Check Date
vendor Name
citv
Fire
Amount
AP
00364335
12/02'2015
CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES INC
25,02
0.00
'_5.02
At'
00364330
12/02'2015
1) & D 1) F R V I CF S INC.
1,290,00
0.00
1.290,00
AP
00')0,1337
12i02, 2015
1) AND K CONCRI"IT COMPANY
1.369.98
0.00
1,369.98
,\ 1)
00,64338
12'02/2015
DANII,'I,S TIRE SERVICE
0.00
5.409.79
5,409.79
Al'
00164339
/?'02/2015
DEM CO INC'
189.88
0.00
189.88
All
00364340
1 / � I
12!02 201 5
DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRF PROTECTION
DE
0.00
-156.96
456,96
All
0036-1341
12/02/2015 15
DIMV RENEWAL
0.00
25.00
25.00
AI'
00364342
12/02/2015
DOWNEY, JENNIFER
10.67
0.00
10,67
AP
00364343
12/02./2015
DUMBEJA, MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT, THE
0.00
300.00
300.00
All
00364344
12%02/2015
DI.JNN, ANN MARIE
96.60
0.00
96,60
AP
00364345
12/02/2015
FNVIRONN/IFNTAI, RECOVERY SERVICES INC.
1,93129
0,00
1,932.29
All
00364346
12!02/2015
FACTORY MOTOR PARTS
0.00
664.25
664.25
At)
003643471
12102;2015
FACTORY MOTOR PARTS
0.00
118.19
118.19
All
0036-1318
121/02120 15
FAIL SA FFITESTING
0.00
81.25
81.25
All
00364349
12/02/2015
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORI'
121.63
0.00
121.63
At'
00364350
12/0212015
FIRSTVETERINARY SIJPI'IY
2,016.52
0.00
2,016,52
All
00364351
12/02/2015
FLEET SERVICES INC.
0.00
249.50
249.50
Al'
00364352
12/0212015
FRED PRYOR SEIMINARS/CAREERTRACK,
299.00
0.00
299.00
AP
00364 3 5 3
12102, %2015
G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS
0,00
_1993.11
2.993.1 I
AP
00364354
12/0212015
G.T. FNGINFFRING
0,00
837,00
UTOO
AP
00364355
12 %02,2015
GA]TWAY ITT CTMFTFRY AND C'REMA'TORY
385M0
(M)o
385.00
Al
0036 -1356
1 ), 02201 5
(1ONS,\I,VFS AND SONJOFA
3.045.00
0.00
3.0-15.00
All
00364,',57
12,012015
GOOD YkAR'l IRE AND RUBBI:R CO,
945.13
0,00
915.13
AP
0036-1358
12'02 20I 5
GRAINGFR
723,07
685.61
1.408.68
Al'
0036 -1359
12 '02/20 15
GRAI)t ll(`S FACTORY INC.
I ,71 W70
000
1,780,70
AP
0030-1360
12,'0', 2015
GRAVES & KING LIT
271.33
0,00
271.33
All
00364161
12/0212015
ORAYBAR
832.57
0.00
832.57
AP
0036,1'6)
:1 -
121/02,1201
I -QUII)MENT
GREEN ROCK POWER 1,
745.15
0.00
745.15
Al'
00364,63
1210212015
GUTRRI-RO. ALIT'NA
425,00
0.00
425.00
AP
0036 136, 1
12
FIASCO INTERNATIONAL INC.
48.51
0.00
48.51
AP
00364365
12
1 IAWFI 10RNF LIFTSYS FFMS
1.029.20
(Wo
1,029.20
AP
0036 -1366
125021,20 1
1 IFNRIKSON OWTN & ASSOC INC.
4,600,00
0.00
1,600.00
A1'
00361367
12102/2015
11 FN R Y SCI I F IN ANIMAL I I E A LTI I SUPPLY LY
245.00
0,00
845.00
Al'
0036-1308
12/02//2015
I IF& I I CONSULTANTS LLC
3,1 15.00
0.00
3.1 15.00
All
0036,1369
12/02/2015
111 WAY SAFT I'Y INC
6.758.23
0000
6,759.21
AP
00361370
12%02,'2015
11ILL'S I)FTNUTRITION
3,847.53
0.00
3,847.53
All
00364371
12/02`2015
HILLS I)E_TNUTRITION SALES INC
3,424,79
0.00
3.424.79
All
003641372
11102,2015
1 IMC ARCHITECTS
0,00
65,069.72
65,069.72
AP
00364373
12/0212015
FIONGYAN, CH EN
2,369.60
110.00
2,479.60
AP
00364374
12/0212015
HOSE-' MAN INC
0.00
1.482.25
1,492.25
A1'
00364375
12102/2015
HOT ATHLETIC APPAREL, INC.
10,502.05
0.00
10-502,05
AP
00364376
12/0212015
1 IOYT LUMBER CO- SM
0.00
40.74
-10.74
AP
0036-1377
1 2,02!1 0 15
111111 ANT: SOCII-J)' OF SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY INI
400.00
0.00
400.00
1)
00364378
12102/2015
I I t,-!N HNG I'ON I I A R DWA R F
76137
0.00
76137
1)
00364379
121022015
IDIIXX DISTRIBUTION INC
3,493.04
0.00
3.493,04
At'
00304380
12/02/2015
INLAND PACIFIC BALLET
40.000.00
0,00
40,000.00
AP
00364381
12!02112015
INLAND VALLEY EMERGENCY PFTCLINIC'
94.50
0.00
84.50
User: VLOPEZ
-
VERONICA
LOPEZ Page: 7
Current Date:
12/09/2015
Report: C:
AGENDA
REG _PORTR A IT-ICON SOLI DATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait
I
Time:
14:57:12
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P69
AND
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Agenda Check Register
11/23/2015 through 12/8x12015
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City hire Amount
A P
00364382
121022015
1NT1R V ET IN
5,745.25
0.00
5;745.25
Al)
00364383
1202/2015
JAC(1UES, PAUL
1,800.00
0.00
1,800.00
�P
00364384
12/0212015
101INSON MALI IINFRY COMPANY
0.00
12,254.51
12?54.51
AP
00364385
12/012015
JONES AND MAYER, LAW OFFICES OP
1,024.00
0.00
1,024.00
All
00- 164386
12) 0212015
KF'1M. BREND1'N
40.00
0.00
40.00
Al'
0016 -1387
12.0212015
KONF INC
633.61
0.00
633.61
AP
00364388
121102 �2015
HFBFR F C'ASSIDY Wi ll "LMOIZL
189830
_1094.50
5.992.80 * **
All
00364389
12!02/'_015
LI "I`TI.E 11EAR, PRODUCTIONS
895.00
0.00
895.00
AP
00364390
12r02/2015
MAIN ST'REL ";T SIGNS
543.02
0.00
543.02
AP
00364391
1210212015
NIANLEY. CARMINA
200.00
0.00
200.00
AP
00364392
121'02!2015
MARIPOSA LANDSCAPi S INC
9,287.84
35.06
9,322.90 * **
Al'
00364393
12!02/2015
MARY S ROBFR '1'S SPAY /NLUTER CLINIC
100.00
0.00
100.00
AP
00364394
12102/2015
MATERIAI_, SALES UNLIMITED
594.00
0.00
594.00
AP
00364395
12/02/2015
MCGILL, DAVID AND CARLA
15.00
0.00
15.00
AP
00304396
12/0212015
MCNIASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY
49994
0.00
499.94
Al'
00364397
12/02/2015
NIcROY, .!ANNA
500.00
0.00
500.00
AP
0036 -1398
1 2102x'2015
MD ENERGY INC
22,044,60
0.00
22,044.60
AY
00364399
12/02/2015
MFDINA_ 13REANNA
0.00
32191
322.91
AP
00364400
12/02/2015
NIFIAWASTE DISPOSAL, LLC
50.00
0.00
50.00
Al)
00364401
12/02!2015
MLINEKE CAR CARL CENTER
2,782.21
0.00
2,782.21
AP
00364402
12/02/2015
MILLEIZ, MELISSA K
17.28
0.00
17.28
AP
00364403
12/02/2015
MOI.INA, I)FBORA11
75.00
0.00
75.00
All
00.6 -1404
12'02/2015
A4OUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR
148.30
0.00
148.30
AP
00364405
12/0212015
MULLEP.. VIVIAN
359.00
0.00
359.00
AP
00361 =106
1'2,,0-' ;2015
NENGEN
551.88
0.00
551.88
AP
0036-110"
12102;2015
NOVARTIS ANIMAI, I IFAI, FI I US INC
76.50
0.00
76.50
AP
00.164408
12/02/2015
0CCLIPATIONA1, 111SA1, H I ChRS OF CA
70.00
0.00
70.00
AP
00,6'1 =110
12- 02'2015
Ol'I`I(IL DEPOT
3,413.06
158.76
3.571.82 * **
AP
00304 -1 I1
1102'2015
ON I ARIO SPAY AND NFUTER INC
975.00
0.00
975.00
All
00364412
12;022015
ITRMACAM)
3.162.35
0.00
3,162.35
AP
0036 -1413
1201'2015
PERSONAL, BFS "I`
2,146.43
0.00
2,146.43
A1)
(103/14.114
12.02!2015
P1? I "1'S ROAD SFRVICI' INC
2.228.03
(1.)0
2,228:03
A1)
0036 -1 -115
12'02, 2015
PONIONA VALLEY VETERINARY IIOSPI`l "AL
25.00
0.00
25.00
-11'
0036 -1-116
12'`02/2015
PRO SHITS GROUP INC
1,467.40
0.00
1,467.40
AP
0036=1417
12/02/2015
R C EMPI.O`t F1; ACTiVITIFS COMMI T "TFE
17,000.00
0.00
17.000.00
AP
00364418
1 2!02/2015
RANCHO SMOG C1NTFIR
70.00
0.00
70.00
AP
003,64 -119
12102/2015
REGENCY EN ITIRPRISF.S INC
1.451.52
0.00
1.451.52
AP
00364 =120
12!02!2015
R ICI IARD IIEATFI AND ASSOCIATES
2.382.10
0.00
2,382.10
AP
00364421
12!0212015
R1CI IARDS WATSON AND GLRSFION
0.00
3.462.50
3,462.50
Al'
00364422
12/0212.015
ROBLES. RAUL P
80.00
0.00
80.00
All
00364423
12/02/2015
RODRIGUEZ INC, RY
1,435.35
0.00
1.435.35
Al)
00364424
12102/2015
SALLEY, BRET
0.00
36.31
36.31
AP
00364425
12/02/2015
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTERS
20.00
0.00
20.00
1P
00361 -1426
12/0212015
SCI 1001- DENISE
0.00
232.89
232.89
A1'
00364427
12/0'_12015
SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC
44.532.63
0.00
44.53163
AP
00,64.128
12'022015
SIGN SI101 1,111.
0.00
364.50
364.50
AP
00364429
12.02 ?2015
Sl FFONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC
3,519.41
0.00
3,519.41
User: V1.01IFY - VERONICA LOPEZ Pagc: 8 Current Date: 12/09/2015
12eport: CK AGFN',DA- REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 14:57:12
CITY OF RANCHO CNCAMONGA P70
AND
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
||/23/2D|5dhmu�il2��0|5
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name ciii Fire Amount
AP
0064430
12/02/20 15
8M&KTL[n �
150,00
0.00
150.00
AP
80364|71
12!02"2815
G0CAL|[G&8COMPANY
7.770.81
397.67
8.168.48 ***
All
00364132
12/02/2015
SOLAR CITY CORPORATION
IO2.825.31
19^947.14
222^77245 +*^
AP
00')644 13
1202/2015
SOUS,K48||GSx
277M
0.00
277M
AP
00364440
12$212015
SOU TU2Rm CALIFORNIA ED|UON
19^977.74
5,68921
25.006.95**�
A|`
00364441
|2N2/20|j
SOUlHCRN CALIFORNIA LAUNDRY COLLC
34J0224
0.00
3|.50224
Al'
0,036,1442
13@21,2815
SOUTB\AND SPORTS OFFICIALS
400.00
0.80
460V0
xP
0O3o4443
|2N2/2U|5
S0(/U|oV[3T�iO8|[ESTOK�6[i�C
3O7�80
8�UV
�07�80
&Y
003644|4
12N1'2015
STOE0KGEGB0UP2INC
2.258,48
8,08
2.258.48
All
n0@4|45
|I021/20|5
ST8ULK.NARKA
2-05 1,00
0.00
2,051,00
A
00364A6
12/0212015
ST0lI80U!Px4SNT
652,13
0.00
052.13
a|`
003)644 17
12*2/2015
SYSC0LOSANGELES INC'
526.42
0.00
26.42
All
00364448
|2NZ/2O|-5
TCKKA VISTA ANIMAL 8OSP|TxL
50.00
(M)8
50,00
&|`
0036-14|9
12/02/2815
l5KkYM HILL Q&SSOC|ATOSINC'
7.500VV
0.80
7,500.80
»}"
00304458
12;02/2015
1 [S%iCK,]CANYVS8
|,80U.00
8.00
1 .8O0o0
AP
0036H51
|2/02/20|j
TOTAL IMAGING SOLUTIONS
935.80
000
935,80
AP
0 036'1452
12/02/2015
TOWN AND COUNTRY UOL[CARS
36.456A8
0,00
36,456.4*
&`
0036U53
1? 02/2015
TKAN3 WEST TRUrKC6NT8K
49]9
0,00
4929
Al'
00364454
12/02/20 15
TK|MMER'PATK|C|A A
5008U
O00
500.80
AP
0O;6445�
12N2/2015
O,3, BANK PARS &CCTA6746022500
14.873b0
0M8
|4.873.68
AP
00364456
12/02/2015
U.S. BANK PARS &CCT#m46O22500
9091
0.00
96I91
xP
003,64457
12m2/2015
OND£KGKODNDSVCAL6KTOP9OCAL
243,00
0.00
243.00
0`
00@44�8
12N2/2015
UN|T2o PACIFIC S6KYlC2S INC
9,764.00
0.00
9.704.00
A 1
00364459
120212015
UPS
37.88
0,00
37.88
AP
00364460
12;02/20 15
URBAN L&MD|NST|TOT2
440.00
088
440.00
A|`
00]64461
|2N2/2015
VA|.|-CYP0YVC&3YSTLK43INC
656,39
0,00
656.3;
All
00364462
12102001 5
VAN SC0YOCxS3OOATCS INC
X'UOO.OV
0,00
8,000D0
00364-163
12 N2 Y2015
YCACFN TR0-&NYMALl{OSY|T&L
5723
0.00
5723
xP
88364465
12/02/2015
YEK|20NCAL![OKN\&
7.289, _37
1,740.15
9.029.52***
All
00364466
12/021I015
VICTOR NED|C&|COMPANY
9.339.09
0.00
9,339.09
AP
0036-1167
12n2/2015
Y|U.A0[NUKSEK|ESVYUOLL8&L2LP
|.|29-5|
0.00
}.|29j|
AP
00364468
|2,/02/2U15
YOKTFX|NDO3 FRIES INC
1.768�1 1
0,08
1,768.11
'A|`
00;64169
12N2I015
\Y&X|E8AN|[^KY SUPPLY
2.1 84�99
0.00
2]84.99
AY
00?64470
1�'022015
\YEGTEwD7wATB0ALSUPPiY
OxO
57.69
5768
AP
000447|
1202D015
Y/EST[KNiDv|vER3|[Y0[U[A[[H3O2NC2
78500
0V0
785.00
�p
0O3b4|7l
|2m2�0|�
YYHxL[\�U�wl2L[[
;5O�8O
O�08
350,00
AP
0036H73
1202D01 5
0UTT|iRF[R]lL|ZFK
1.47420
0.00
1.47420
& `
(N3h4474
|20��05
v/U|TTL[,L|NDA
17-1.00
0,00
174,00
xp
00364475
12/02/2015
Yv|LD0N AND8SLL
627.05
(00
627'05
All
00364476
12/02/2015
YV|N%CKCOKP0D&T|ON
0.00
597.02
597.02
Al'
00364477
12/02/2015
\V|RZ AND COMPANY
53l62
0.00
537.62
Al'
00364478
1202/2015
ZOET|3OSLLC
1.124.17
80)
1.124.17
A|`
00364484
|2m�/2O|5
DROD�KTROO�S
9.876�45
0.00
9.8764j
All
08364186
|2/03/20|5
CV\vD
19.310.86
972.39
20,283.25 ~*^
AP
0036|487
12N3/2015
CITRUS, MOTORS ONTARIO INC
7.437]2
0,00
7743732
AP
80364488
12m3/201 j
E\v|NG IRRIGATION PkDDUCTS
606,88
0.00
006.88
A 1
00364489
121/01/2815
}|OL[loAY ROCK C0INC
1,970J9
0J00
1.970J9
User: V1,01IFY - VERONICA LOPEZ Pnuc: 9 Current Date: 12/09/2-0 15
IZopor|:CE_AGENDA_REG_ PORTRAIT _CONSOLIDATED -CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait l Time: 14:57:12
Note:
Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures
User: VI,C)PFZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 10 Current Date: 12109;2015
I - Portrait t Time: 14:57:12
Report: CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
P71
AND
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Af4enda Check Register
1 1;23/2015 thl-OLIgh 12/8/2015
Check
No.
Check Date
Vendor Name
City
Fire Amount
Al'
00;64490
12'03/2015
HYDRO SCAPE PRODUCTS INC
1.413.27
0.00 1,413.27
AP
003644191
12/03/2015
INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLIHITIN
980,00
0.00 980.00
AP
00364492
12,10312015
KMF FIRE APPARATUS
OM 1.62156
1,623.56
AP
00364-193
12/03/2015
LANDCARE
46.883.79
0.00 46,883.79
AP
00364494
12/03/2015
LIVIS AUTO INC
3,691,16
OM 3,691,16
AP
00364195
12/03/2015
ORKIN PE-ST CONTROL
68.00
129.00 197.00
Al'
00364496
12103/2015
SUNRISF FORD
65 24
0.00 65.24
AP
00364497
12/0312015
LINIFIRST UNIFORM SFRVICF
0.00
77.17 77.17
AP
00364498
12/0312015
V I STA PAINT
967.91
0,00 967.91
Total Citv:
54,389,383.86
Total Fire:
$237,476.25
Grand Total:
34,626,860.11
Note:
Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures
User: VI,C)PFZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 10 Current Date: 12109;2015
I - Portrait t Time: 14:57:12
Report: CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AND
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Electronic Debit Register
November 1, 2015 - November 30, 2015
DATE
DESCRIPTION
CITY
FIRE
AMOUNT
11/25
CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit
198,344.93
198,344.93
11/25
Workers Comp - City Account Transfer
3,088.27
3,088.27
11/25
Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer
229.08
229.08
11/27
CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit
814.58
814.58
11/27
CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit
1,291.35
1,291.35
11/27
CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit
3,735.78
3,735.78
11/27
CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit
4,865.55
4,865.55
11/27
CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit
7,566.69
7,566.69
11/27
CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit
105,813.29
105,813.29
11/27
Workers Comp - City Account Transfer
361.20
361.20
11/27
Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer
8,744.10
8,744.10
11/30
Workers Comp - City Account Transfer
1,336.62
1,336.62
11/30
Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer
825.20
825.20
Total City $ 583,235.26
Total Fire $ 308,492.08
GRAND TOTAL $ 891,727.34
2
P72
P73
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AND
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Electronic Debit Register
November 1, 2015 - November 30, 2015
DATE
DESCRIPTION
CITY
FIRE
AMOUNT
11/2
Workers Comp - City Account Transfer
933.06
933.06
11/2
Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer
159.00
159.00
11/3
AUTHNET GATEWAY BILLING CCD 41443480
52.35
52.35
11/3
Workers Comp - City Account Transfer
432.99
432.99
11/3
Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer
2,434.83
2,434.83
11/4
Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer
3,359.12
3,359.12
11/5
CALPERS - City- Retirement Account Deposit
1,373.96
1,373.96
11/5
CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit
9,754.90
9,754.90
11/5
Workers Comp - City Account Transfer
3,866.81
3,866.81
11/5
Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer
430.65
430.65
11/6
Workers Comp - City Account Transfer
11,004.59
11,004.59
11/6
Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer
5,070.16
5,070.16
11/9
BANK TRANSFER - Community Foundation for Golf Tournament
4,010.00
4,010.00
11/9
WIRE TRANSFER - To California ISO
57,675.13
57,675.13
11/9
Workers Comp - City Account Transfer
1,347.38
1,347.38
11/9
Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer
7,282.59
7,282.59
11/10
Workers Comp - City Account Transfer
1,248.62
1,248.62
11/10
Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer
2,422.83
2,422.83
11/12
CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit
21,89193
21,893.93
11/12
CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit
198,218.34
198,218.34
11/12
CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit
815.68
815.68
11/12
CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit
1,291.35
1,291.35
11/12
CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit
3,735.78
3,735.78
11/12
CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit
4,865.55
4,865.55
11/12
CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit
7,566.69
7,566.69
11/12
CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit
105,768.23
105,768.23
11/12
STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments
2,132.23
2,132.23
11112
STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments
3,582.31
3,582.31
11/12
Workers Comp - City Account Transfer
1,393.70
1,393.70
11/12
Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer
524.19
524.19
11/13
Workers Comp - City Account Transfer
3,584.48
3,584.48
11/13
Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer
114.66
114.66
11/16
Workers Comp - City Account Transfer
582.85
582.85
11/16
Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer
26.78
26.78
11/18
CCV ORDER 353368 DEL 151119 LOC 00000001S
500.00
500.00
11118
Workers Comp - City Account Transfer
382.53
382.53
11/19
Workers Comp - City Account Transfer
24.66
24.66
11/19
Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer
2,170.38
2,170.38
11/20
Workers Comp - City Account Transfer
3,875.54
3,875.54
11/20
Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer
2,265.00
2,265.00
11/23
Workers Comp - City Account Transfer
1,219.38
1,219.38
11123
Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer
471.72
471.72
11/24
STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments
2,132.23
2,132.23
11/24
STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments
4,345.80
4,345.80
11/24
WIRE TRANSFER - To California ISO
3,396.55
3,396.55
11/24
Workers Comp - City Account Transfer
3,065.90
3,065.90
11/24
Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer
15,903.16
15,903.16
11/25
ANALYSIS DEFICIT - Bank Fee - October 2015
23,432.81
23,432.81
11/25
CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit
22,569.32
22,569.32
isil
MEMORANDUM
CIn- 1\L-1NAGER'S OFFICE
Date: December 16, 2015
To: Mayor and Members of the
From: John R. Gillison, City M�a
By: Breanna L. Medina, Emer6
nagement Coordinator
RANCHO
UCAMONGA
Subject: CONTINUATION OF RE-SOLUTION NO. 15 -093, PROCLAMING THE
EXISTENCE OF A LOCAL DROUGHT EMERGENCY UNDER GOVERNMENT
CODE SECTION 8630 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE
SECTION 2.36
Recommendation
Continue Resolution No. 15 -093 proclaiming the existence of a Local Drought Emergency under
Government Code Section 8630 and Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.36.
Background
On January 17, 2014, the Governor proclaimed a state of emergency due to current drought conditions.
On April 1, 2015, the Governor also issued Executive Order B -29 -15 which directed expedited actions to
reduce the harmful impacts from water shortages and other impacts of the drought. The Governor's
proclamation called upon local water suppliers and municipalities to implement water shortage
contingency plans immediately in order to avoid or forestall outright restrictions that could become
necessary later in the drought season. In response to these actions, on May 12, 2015 the Cucamonga
Valley Water District declared a Stage 6 - Severe Water Emergency in Resolution No. 2015 -5 -3.
Cucamonga Valley Water District has declared a Stage 6 - Severe Water Emergency in order to achieve
a 35% reduction in potable water as part of the mandate for a total statewide reduction as outlined by
the State Water Resources Control Board. As a customer of the Cucamonga Valley Water District, the
City of Rancho Cucamonga will need to enact emergency measures through ordinance and other
operational and administrative actions in order to meet these executive orders and mandated
conservation numbers.
Additionally, the existing drought conditions exacerbate already perilous fire conditions in the northern
portions of the wild land urban interface of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and increase the risk of flash
floods due to soil conditions. These conditions are likely to be beyond the services, equipment,
personnel and fiscal resources of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Continuation of this local drought
emergency will allow the Director of Emergency Services (City Manager) to continue to exercise the
powers, functions, and duties of the emergency organization of the City prescribed by state law,
ordinances, and resolutions existing and passed in conjunction with this emergency.
Respectfully submitted,
John R. Gillison
City Manager
P75
STAFF REPORT
RANCHO CUCANIONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Date: December 16, 2015
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
John R. Gillison, City Manager
From: Mike Costello, Fire Chief
By: Breanna Medina, Emergency Management Coordinator
4 V,
Subject: AUTHORIZATION TO APPROPRIATE $10,000 INTO ACCOUNT 1380501 -5152
(SOFTWARE) FOR THE PURCHASE OF WEBEOC INCIDENT MANAGEMENT
SOFTWARE MODULES AND $20,623 INTO ACCOUNT 1380501 -5603 (CAPITAL
EQUIPMENT) FOR THE PURCHASE OF HAZMAT DETECTION EQUIPMENT TO BE
REIMBURSED BY THE FY2014 HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT
RECOMMENDATION
Authorize appropriation of $10,000 into account 1380501 -5152 (Software), for the purchase of
WebEOC Incident Management Software and $20,623 into account 1380501 -5603 (Capital
Equipment) for the purchase of HazMat equipment.
BACKGROUND
The FY2014 Homeland Security Grant contained a non - competitive portion of funding designated
for each Fire Department/District in the San Bernardino County Operational Area. The funds
allocated to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District have been designated for the purchase
of WebEOC Incident Management Software modules to enhance existing software implementation
as well as the purchase of HazMat detection equipment to enhance emergency response. These
funds are 100% reimbursable to the Fire Protection District through the FY2014 Homeland Security
Grant.
Respectfully submitted,
Mike Costello
Fire Chief
STAFF REPORT
PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DEPARTMENT
RANCHO
Date: December 16, 2015 CUCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members ofthe City Council
John R.8iUioon. City Manager
From: William Wittkopf Public Works Services Director
By: Ernest Ru|z, Gtreats, Gtnrnn Drains and Fleet Superintendent
Kenneth Fung. Assistant Engineer
Subject: CONSIDERATION TO ACCEPT THE ILLUMINATED STREET NAME SIGN
REPLACMENT— FY 13/14 PROJECT, CONTRACT N{}. 14-151 AS COK8PLETE,
RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND; ACCEPT /\MA|NTENA(}EBOND;
AUTHORIZE THE RELEASE (]F THE LABOR AND MATERIALS BOND; APPROVE `
^
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DIRECTOR TOFILE
A NOTICE OF CDK4PLET|ON, RELEASE THE RETENTION 35 DAYS AFTER
ACCEPTANCE AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF$87.O08.11
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council accept the Illuminated Street Name SigOReplacemont — FY
13/14 Project, Contract No. 14-151 as uoDlokabe. release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept
Maintenance Bond` authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of
$O7.00D.11 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received, authorize
the release of the retention in the amount of $4.350.41. 35 days after acceptance; and approve the
final contract amount of87.00O.11.
The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications
and to the satisfaction of the Public Works Services Director.
The U|uOl\n8tad Street Name Sign Replacement — FY 13/14 Project scope of work consisted of
retrofitting illuminated street name signs with energy efficient LED |iQhting, replacing damaged signs
and/or individual sign panels and the relocation of existing illuminated street name signs from mast
arm mounting to 8VVind resistant horizontal davit arm mounting.
Pertinent information of the project is as follows:
)�, Budgeted Amount:
$100.00�00
> Account Numbers:
1170303-5300
Engineer's Estimate:
$90,000.00
> City Council Approval toAdvertise:
March 19,2D14
Publish dates for local paper:
March 25.2O14
April 1,2U14
Bid Opening:
April 22.2U14
> Contract Award Date:
May 21.2O14
.. `
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
ILLUMINATED STREET NAME SIGN REPLACEMENT— FY13/14 PROJECT NOTICE [)F
COMPLETION
DECEMBER 1O.2O15
�
Low Bidder: Aegis ITS, Inc. ofAnaheim
Contract Amount: 887.008.11
� 15q6Contingency: $12.991.09
�^
Final Contract Amount: $87.008.11
�
Difference in Contract Amount: $0.00 (0.00%)
This project had no Contract Change Orders.
Attachment
P77
atV
RESOLUTION NO. 15 -213
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
ILLUMINATED STREET NAME SIGN REPLACEMENT -- FY 13/14
PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 14 -151 AND AUTHORIZING THE
FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the Illuminated Street Name Sign Replacement -FY 13/14
Project, Contract No. 14 -151, has been completed to the satisfaction of the Public
Works Services Director; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the
work complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the Public Works
Services Director is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County
Recorder of San Bernardino County.
STAFF REPORT
PUBLIC WORKS SERVICE,; DEPARTNIENT
RANCHO
Date: December 16, 2015 CUCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
John R. GiUimoO, City Manager
From: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director
By: T«C>Ua|Dbanoe. Facilities Superintendent
Kenneth FVDg, Assistant Engineer
Subject: CONSIDERATION TO ACCEPT THE DEPARTMENT OF |NNO\A\T|C)N AND
TECHNOLOGY (Oo|T) TENANT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, CONTRACT NO, 15-14B
AS COMPLETE, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND; ACCEPT /\
MAINTENANCE BOND; AUTHORIZE THE RELEASE OF THE LABOR AND
MATERIALS BOND; APPROVE A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PUBLIC WORKS
SERVICES DIRECTOR TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLET|DN, RELEASE THE
RETENTION 35 DAYS AFTER ACCEPTANCE AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT
AMOUNT OF$81.55O�8O
RECOMMENDATION
Uie recommended that the City Council accept the Department Of Innovation and Technology (Do|l)
Tenant Improvement Project, Contract No, 15-149, as complete, release the Faithful Performance
Bond, accept 8 Maintenance Bond, eUthod7B the F8|*Og8 of the Labor and Materials Bond in the
amount of $85,000 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been PsceiV8d,
authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $4,077,54, 35 days after acceptance; and
approve the final contract amount of $81.550.88.
The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications
and to the satisfaction of the Public Works Services Director.
The Department of Innovation and Technology (Oo|l) Tenant |nnprovornort Project scope of work
consisted of the demolition of the existing improvements and upgrading of the electrical distribution,
communication, heabDQ. ventilation and cooling ay8hsO0a. the relocation Cf light fixtures, the r9DloVa|
and nap|acenn8[d of ceiling d|en and carpeting, the construction of several new walls, drywall repair,
and the application nf fresh paint.
Pertinent information Ofthe project iseSfollows:
Budgeted Amount: $93.000
Account Numbers: 1025001-5602
)` Engineer's Estimate: $85'000
t"
City Council Approval toAdvertise: July 1.2O15
X~
Publish dates for local paper: July 7.2O15
July 14.2O15
DO{T TENANT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NOTICE DFCOMPLETION
DECEMBER 2,2015
PAGE
�
Bid Opening:
�
Contract Award Date:
�
Low Bidder:
'k Contract Amount:
� 1096 Contingency:
Final Contract Amount:
}^
Difference in Contract Amount:
August 4.2015
August 19.2O15
St, George Construction nfCorona
$O5`OOO
$8,500
$81,550.88
There were two (2) Contract Change Orders. Contract Change Order O1 was o credit due to the City
revising the fire sprinkler system and ordering a custom door/frame for the tech room instead of the
contractor, Contract Change Order 02 was for a series of additional work and bid item deletions.
Attachment
.-
RESOLUTION NO. 15 -214
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
DEPARTMENT OF INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY (DoIT)
TENANT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 15 -149
AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the Department of Innovation and Technology (DoIT) Tenant
Improvement Project, Contract No. 15 -149, has been completed to the satisfaction of
the Public Works Services Director; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the
work complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the Public Works
Services Director is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County
Recorder of San Bernardino County.
.N
` ! a- -1
From: William Wttkopf, Public Works Services Director
By: Ty Quaintance, Facilities Superintendent
Kenneth Fung, Assistant Engineer
Subject: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A FAMILY RESTROOM AT LOANMART STADIUM AT THE
EPICENTER PROJECT AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE THE
"NOTICE INVITING BIDS ", TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT 1120401-
5650/1911120-0 (PARK DEVELOPMENT)
Staff recommends the City Council approve the plans and specifications for the Construction of a
Family Restroom at LoanMart Stadium at the Epicenter Project and approve the attached
resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids "; to be funded from
account 1120401 - 5650/1911120 -0 (Park Development).
1 r �[ � .+ [ t i Z� 1� 1� 1�/ �1 i► a j �'�� �` 1
The City is proposing the construction of a family restroom at LoanMart Stadium at the Epicenter
in response to customer requests and based on a federal mandate. The family restroom will be
constructed along the first base side between the existing women and men's restroom.
Legal advertising is scheduled for December 22, 2015 and December 29, 2015 with a bid opening
at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, January 12, 2016 unless extended by Addenda. A mandatory pre -bid
job walk is scheduled at 10:00 a.m. on Monday, January 4, 2016. Staff anticipates awarding a
contract on January 20, 2016.
Respectfulsubmi ted,
William Wittkopf
Public Works Services Director
WW:TQ /kf
Attachment: Resolution
RESOLUTION NO. 15-215
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF /\ FAMILY
RESTROOK0 AT LOANK8ARTSTADfUK0 AT THE EPICENTER
PROJECT |N SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING
THE CITY CLERK T{J ADVERTISE TC} RECEIVE BIDS
VVHERE/\S, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to oonatnJCf
certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
WHEREAS, the {]h/ of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared aoecifC@tOOe for the
construction of certain improvements.
NOW. THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUC&K8ON(3A,HEREBY RESOLVES, that the plans and specifications presented bv the City of
Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the
"CONSTRUCTION {JF FAMILY RESTRODMATLOANW1ART STADIUM AT THE EPICENTER
PROJECT"
BE[T FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed
to advertise on required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work
specified in the aforesaid speCif|catiOne, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the
following words and figures, to wit:
"NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS"
Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino
County, California, directing this notice. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho
Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. VO TuesdGy, January 12. 2015. sealed bids or
proposals for the "CONSTRUCTION OF FAMILY RESTRC}DK8 AT LOANMART STADIUM AT
THE EPICENTER PROJECT" in said Qb/.
Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 1O500 Civic Center Drive,
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730.
Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho
CUCanOODga. California, marked, ''Bid for the "CONSTRUCTION OF FAMILY RESTRDOM AT
LOANN4ART STADIUM AT THE EPICENTER PROJECT"
A mandatory pre-Bid meeting and site tour will be held on K8onday. January 4. 2018.
beginning at1O:0On.rn. Refer to Item "(]. Pre-Bid Meeting" mf the "Instructions toBidders"
of the bid documents for approximate directions. Attendees are required to sign in at the
Pre-Bid meeting. Bids from companies that did not have a representative sign in at the
Pre-Bid meeting will be rejected.
PREVAILING WAGE: Notice iG hereby given that iO accordance with the provisions ofCalifornia
Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2. the Contractor is required to pay not
|eGn than the general prevailing [ate of per diem vvogeo for work of a similar character in the
locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per
diem vvages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director ofthe Department of
|ndVSi[ia| Relations of the State Of California is required to and has determined such general
Resolution No. - Page of
prevailing rates of per them wages, Copies of such prevailing rates of per them wages are onfile
in the offima of the City Clerk, City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California, and are available tO any interested party on request. They can also be
found at under the "Statistics and Research" Tab. The Contracting Agency also
shall cause 8 copy Qf such determinations tObe posted ut the job site.
Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775. the Contractor shall forfeit, oS penalty to the
City of Rancho CucaDlnOga, not more than two hundred dollars /$200.00\ for each laborer,
xvorknOan, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such |gbO[8[,
vvorh[naO or mechanic is paid |eaG than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before
stipulated for any work done under the attached contnact, by him or by any subcontractor Under
him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code.
Attention ka directed tothe provisions iOSecdona1777.5and1777.8oftheLaborCodeconce[Dng
the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him,
G8CdoO 1777.5, as annoOdRd, requires the Contractor Or subcontractor employing tradesmen in
any 8ppnenticob|e DCCUp8doD to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of
the public vvorha project and vVh(oh administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for m
certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will
be used iD the performance Of the contract. The ratio 0f apprentices tO journeymen iO such cases
shall not boless than one t0 five except:
A. When unemployment inthe area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship commdtee
has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days priorto the request of certificate,
or
B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five,
or
C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through
apprenticeship training onaB annual basis statewide or locally, nr
D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all
of his contracts on an anDU8| average of not less than one apprentice to eight
journeymen.
The Contractor isrequired to make contributions to funds established for the administration of
apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices orjourneymen in any apprenticable
trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such
CODthbUtinna
The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections
1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices.
Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may
be obtained from the Director of Industrial Re|aUone, ex-officio the Administrator of
Apprenticeship, G8O F[8noiaoo^ California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and
its branch offices.
Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute 8legal day's work for all workmen employed inthe
execution Dfthis contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with
and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth
in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1. Article 3Ofthe Labor Code Vf the State Cf California ooamended.
Resolution No. - Page 2 of 4
WR
The Contractor shall forfeit, as o penalty b}the City ofRancho Cucamonga, dollars
($25.0[) for each k3bonar, vvorknnan, or mechanic employed in the execution of the CoOtGact, by
h|no or any subcontractor under hirD, upon any of the vVod( herein before noeObonad, for each
calendar day during which said laborer, vvo[h[DaD' or mechanic is required or permitted to labor
more than eight (0) hours in violation of said Labor Code.
Contractor agrees to pay trove/ and oUbaiGt8OCe pay to each vvorknOoD needed to execute the
work required by this contract as such tnGVe| and GUbS(Gi8Dce payments are defined in the
applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773. 1.
The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond,
payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of
said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is avv@[d8d
to hiOl, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash. cashiers' oheck, certified
check, o[ bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next |OVveSt b|dder, the amount of
the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga tUthe difference
b8bm8Bn the |ovv bid and the second |ovV8St bid, and the surplus, if any Sh8U be returned to the
lowest bidder.
The amount Cf the bond tobe given t8secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work
shall be1ODY6Vfthe contract price thereof, and aD additional bond |nen amount equal ho1OO96
of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials
or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or
any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a
certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work tob8done
under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga
for the construction of said work.
Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and daGo as required by any
and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work tObe performed under this contract;
induding, but not limited \o. 8 C|8SS "B" (General Building Contractor) in accordance with the
provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section
7DOO et. Saq] and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto.
The Contractor, pU[8U8nt to the "California Business and Professions [|udo`" Section 7028.15.
shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and
be signed by the Con1naCiO[ declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being
provided in true and correct.
The work in to be done in aCCVPdaDCe with the specifications of the City of Rancho CuCa[D0Dg@
on file in the Office ofthe City Clerk at1O5OO Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.
|ngO effort tOgo green and papedess. digital copies of the plans, specifications, and bid proposal,
including any hJtWFe addenda or neViyinDo to the bid documents, are available by going to
and signing Vp, by going t0 Member Login or K0enOberGigDUp (it's free), then
choose California, then scroll down tO 8eO Bernardino County and click on Browse Cities, then
scroll down tO Rancho Cucamonga and click on City Projects, thenc|iokontheP jectofiOi8naet
UDd8F the Title and fO||ovV directions for download. Not8, copies of the p|8ns, epaCific8tiOns, bid
proposal, addendums and revisions will not be provided, digital copies must be downloaded from
the above vveboito then printed. Prospective bidders must register for an account VO
to be included on the prospective bidder's list(s) and to receive email updates of
any addenda Or revisions to the bid documents. Be advised that the information contained OO
this Site may change over time and without notice to prospective bidders or raQint8nad uoo[e.
Resolution No. - Page 3 of 4
While effort is made to keep information current and accurate and to notify registered prospective
bidders of any changes kJ the bid documents, itim the responsibility nf each prospective bidder to
register with www.ciplist.com and to check this weboite on a DAILY basis through the close of
bids for any applicable 8d da0[updates.
No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been
issued by the City of Rancho CuoornonQe to registered prospective bidders from
vmwm/.cip|ist.00nn.
The successful bidder will be required to 8Oha[ into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General PrnviSiODa, as set forth in
the Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor
[nmy. Upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute
authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention),
The Qty of Rancho Cucamonga, reaen/no the right to reject any or all bids.
Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for the "CONSTRUCTION OF FAMILY RESTROOM
AT LOANMART STADIUM ATTHE EPICENTER PFlC)JEOT" may be directed to:
KenneUlFUOQ
Assistant Engineer
O784 Lion St.
Rancho CUoaDloOgG. CA 91730
(SO9) 477-273O ext. 4139
(e-mail at Kenneth. Funq(a-),citvofrc.us)
All questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids must be in writing (+mai| iaacceptable)
and received by the City no later than 12:00 prn on Wednesday, January 6, 2016. The City
is not responsible for questions undeliverable.
ADVERTISE ON: December 22.2U15 and December 2S.2O15
Resolution No. - Page 4 of 4
,STAFF REPORT
ENGINEERING SERVicEs DEPARTTMENT
Date: December 16, 2015 RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
John R. Gillison, City Manager
From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
By: Carlo Cambare, Engineering Technician
Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR
TRACT 16226-2, LOCATED NORTH OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND WEST OF
ETIWANDA AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY BMC RANCHO ETIWANDA, LLC
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement
extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public
improvements for Tract 16226-2 were approved by the City Council on December 16, 2015, in the following
amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond: $ 524,500.00
Labor and Material Bond: $ 524,500.00
Monumentation Cash Deposit $ 8,026.00
Due to unforeseen delays, which have now been resolved, commencement of the development could not
have occurred as anticipated.
Residential development
No. of lots: 95
Estimated percentage of completed public improvements: 45%
No. of occupied lots: 0
No. of lot currently in construction: 14
Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's office.
MAS:CC/rIf
Attachment
PROLECT
_p
i
": •
RESOLUTION NO. 15-216
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 16226-2
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for
its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on December 16, 2015, by
BMC Rancho Etiwanda, LLC, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent
to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located north of Day Creek
Boulevard, west of Etiwanda Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement
Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of
said Tract 16226-2; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied
by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement
Extension.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said
Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized
to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and
the City Clerk to attest thereto.
RESOLUTION NO, 15-216 — Page 1
laeff
ENGINEERING SERNTICEsDEPAK�IE0I
Date: December 16, 2015
To: Mayor and Members Cf the City Council
John R.GiUieon. City Manager
From: Mark A. 8ieuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
By: Carlo CG[Db8ne. Engineering Technician
Subject CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR
TRACT 18034. LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CHICKASAW ROAD AND
EAST AVENUE, SUBMITTED B`/RCPRDJ.1.LUC
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement
extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement.
Improvement Agreement and |0pnDv90eOt Security to guarantee the construction of the public
improvements for Tract 18034 were approved by the City Council on December 16, 2015, in the following
amounts:
Faithful Performance Bond: $ 81.000.00
Labor and Material Bond: $ 81.000.00
N1oDumenkaion Cash Deposit $ 2.891.00
Because of unforeseen delays, which have now been resolved, commencement of the development could
not have occurred as anticipated.
Residential development
No. of lots: 7
Estimated percentage of completed public improvements: 1096
No. of occupied lots: O
No. of lot currently in construction: 7
Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's office.
K8/\S:CC/df
Attachment
. ...... ...
P91
96%
RESOLUTION NO. 15-217
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 18034
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for
its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on December 16, 2015, by RC
Proj. 1, LLC, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property
specifically described therein, and generally located at the southwest corner of Chickasaw Road
and East Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement
Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of
said Tract 18034; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied
by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement
Extension.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said
Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized
to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and
the City Clerk to attest thereto.
RESOLUTION NO. 15-217 — Page 1
P93
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES GROUP
Date: December 16, 2015
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
John R. Gillison, City Manager
From: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager /Administrative Services
By: Robert Neiuber, Human Resources Director
Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING SALARY
SCHEDULES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015116, INCLUDING A PART -TIME EMPLOYEE
BENEFIT SUMMARY
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt the attached
resolution approving the Fiscal Year 2015/16 salary schedules for job classifications employed by the
City including a part -time employee benefit summary.
BACKGROUND
The City Council traditionally adopts salary resolutions biannually for those classifications employed
by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. These resolutions are updated to reflect changes in salaries,
additions and deletions of classifications, changes in job titles and other terms of employment.
The resolution also adopts the following:
The removal of the four job titles that are no longer in use and not anticipated to be necessary for
the future staffing needs of the Departments: Information Services Manager, GIS /Special District
Manager, Information Services Projects Coordinator and Community Improvement Supervisor.
Updating job titles in the Department of Innovation & Technology to remove references to the
former Information Services Division, instead using "Information Technology"
Changes to the lower end of certain part -time positions in order to bring the amount in legal
compliance with the January 1, 2016 minimum wage increase. The upper ranges of the positions
remain unchanged.
Attachment
1. Resolution 15 -218
2. Salary Schedule for Executive Management Employee Job Classifications
3. Salary Schedule for Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association Covered Job
Classifications
4. Salary Schedule for San Bernardino Public Employees Association Job Classifications
5. Salary Schedule for Part -Time City Job Classifications
6. Part -Time Employee Benefit Summary
7. Part -Time Employee's Uniform policy
RESOLUTION NO. 15-218
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCH[] CUCAK0ONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE
SALARY SCHEDULES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015M8, INCLUDING
A PART-TIME EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SUMMARY AND CITY
COUNCIL BENEFITS.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined that it is
necessary for the efficient operation and Dl8D8gerDeDt of the City that policies be established
prescribing salary ranges, benefits and holidays and other policies for 8nOp|Oy8eS of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga; and
WHEREAS, the City {|OUOci| of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has previously adopted
salary resolutions establishing salary nang8s, benefits and other terms Of 8Dlp|VyDlent for
employees Of the City Of Rancho Cucamonga; and
WHEREAS, the City {}OUDCi| of the City Of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes that it is
necessary from time to time to amend the salary resolution to accommodate changes in position
tides, classifications salary ronQes, benefits and other terms of employment iOC|UdiOQ an outline
of State and Federally required benefits afforded to part-time employees; and
NOW, THEREFORE' BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California tO approve the salary schedules (Attachments 1-4\; approve the part-time
benefit Sunlnl8ry (Attachment 5-6); and permit eligible City Council members to eD[nU in the
California Public Employees Retirement System, the PARS GUpp|8[OHDtG| Retirement P|8n,
participate in the Executive Management Executive VVeUD8SS P|8O. and provide o monthly
mileage allowance iD the amount Of two hundred dollars.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this _ day of 2015
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
ATTEST:
Janice Reynolds, City Clerk
:06111 1
UOIN
|. Janice RevDO|dS. {}hv Clerk of the City Of R8DChO CUC@DlOOgg' do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City COUDCi| of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, at @ Meeting of said Council on the day of ' 2015.
Executed this day nf . 2O158t Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Janice Reynolds, City Clerk
.•�
Resolution # 15 -218
EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP
ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES
Monthly Pay Ranges effective January 11, 2016
Minimum Control Point Maximum
Class Title
lStep Amount
SfeP
Amount
=Siepu ,.
Amount
Animal Services Director
1572 $7,684612
$9,381
77TW
$10,895
Assistant City Manager
'1660 =; $11,918
470.
$14,550
1730w ;
$16,898
Building and Safety Services Director
$8,28127;
s
$10,110
- .�6._s
$11,741
City Clerk Services Director
1544 $6,683
1584 rr7
$8,158
161 .M~
$9,475
City Manager
1744 ` $18,120
17$;w
$22,12111314
.:
$25,691
Community Services Director
,16Q5 -' $9,059
1645
$11,059
;� 17r
$12,844
Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services
":1625 $10,009
1665.
$12,219
165.
$14,191
Deputy City Manager/ Econ. &Comm. Dev.
$10,009
0 16 _5;
$12,219
1695,
$14,191
Eng Svs Director/City Engineer
°1,606,x- $9,104
w,"',- ,
$11,115
1676
$12,908
Finance Director
x,;� $9,150
167:.`
$11,170167
, =�
$12,973
Human Resources Director
x1599 r ; $8,792
1639:.. "°
$10,733
,_1669 .w
$12,465
Innovation and Technology Director,,M9615.,
,= $9,522
1655:
$11,625
1685, :
$13,501
Library Director
16$9 <. $8,364
7629;x-
$10,211
1.659# :;
$11,859
Planning Director
1599.. $8,792
°'� 163,9 rx
$10,733
:,1.669 ."
$12,465
Public Works Services Director
$8,281
1627.
$10,110
1.657 �z
$11,741
Fire Chief"
A
$11,950
G
$16,015
Included for informational purposes only - This is a Fire District Management Employee Group position not a City position
Executive Management
January 11, 2016
WIN
Resolution No. 15-218
RCCEA COVERED EMPLOYEES IN THE
MID MANAGER, SUPERVISORY/PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL EMPLOYEES GROUPS
ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES
Monthly Pay Ranges Effective January 11, 2016
Minimum Control Point Maximum
Class TitleSfep
Amount
y Step
Amount
Step
Amount
Account Clerk
$2,850
$3,48050.
$3,750
Account Technician443
$3,621
446
$4,421
$4,765
Accountant#
fill 465,
$4,462
$5,448
520
$5,870
Accounting Manager*
$6,019
fl,
$7,348
fl4
$7919
Administrative Secretary'
77"
-�7`7
$3,640
$4,443
01-1 7*
$4,788
Administrative Technician
$3,883
X4477
$4,741
$5,109
Animal Care Attendant
4349 r
$2,504
$3,057
g
$ 3,294
Animal Caretaker
4378
$2,893
$3,532
$3,807
Animal Care Supervisor#
3416
$3,495
$4,267
$4,597
Animal Center Manager*
2506
$5,475
2546
$6,684
256
$7,203
Animal Handler
77-70-�
g
$3,041
$3,71343
$4,001
Animal License Canvasser4349
-$-2,504
4389~
$3,057
$3,294
Animal Services Dispatcher
$2
05",766 p4409
$3,377
442
$3,640
Animal Services Officer 1
$3,586
IM
$4,377
_ 7
$4,717
Animal Services Officer 11
$3,962
$4,836
4496
$5,212
Assistant City Clerk #
$4,809
W-g-eP
$5,871355K
$6,326
Assistant City Engineer*
$8 ,324
-11'
2
$10,162264v
$10,951
Assistant Engineer#
3488
$5,005
-$6,110
$6,583
Assistant Library Director*
$7,610
g
$9,290
$10,011
Assistant Planner#
$4,530
q,_
'N
$5,530
$5,958
Assistant to the City Manager*
$6,751
$8,242
1�-$8,882
Associate Engineer#
3518
$5,81335v$
$7,096
$7,646
Associate Planner#348
$4,980
7--�4 -E"
$6,079
~3542
$6,551
Box Office Coordinator
7,144
$4,143
$5,058
$5,451
Budget Analyst#
$5,261
$6422
SEE.
$6,920
Building Inspection Supervisor #2
$5,421
71§1;
-7
$6,617
3559
$7,130
2
Building Inspector
$4,443
122 4
$5,424
$5,846
Building Safety Manager*
2533
$6,264
"1
$7,6482588
$8,241
Business License Clerk
$2,893
48
j1
$3,532
g
$3,807
Business License Inspector
$3,532
58 =
$4,312
$4,647
Business License Program Coordinator#
$3,785
1 -,'1-31- 7-2
$4,621
$4,979
Business License Technician
$3,360
$4,102
gi 4
$4,421
Buyer I
p
$3,411
W
A
$4 ,164
$4,488
Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association January 11, 2016
:0611:1
Resolution No. 15-218
RCCEA COVERED EMPLOYEES IN THE
MID MANAGER, SUPERVISORY /PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL EMPLOYEES GROUPS
ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES
Monthly Pay Ranges Effective January 11, 2016
Minimum Control Point Maximum
Buyer 11 #
3433 -,
$3,804
$4,644
$5,004
Community Improvement Officer 1
4
$3,586
X44
$4,377
$4,717
Community Improvement Officer 11
4441
$3,962
$4,836
71- X446
$5,212
Community Improvement Manager*
X533
$6,2643
$7 ,648
1,151
$8,241
Communications Manager*
2
$7,348
2
$8,9716$
0
$9667
Community Programs Coordinator
4450
$4,143
4904
-
$5,058
SOrt
-$5,451
Community Programs Specialist
$3,883
$4,741
$5,109
Community Services Coordinator450
$4,143
490
$5,058$
74
-$5451
Community Services Marketing Coord
$4,143
$5,058
$5,451
Community Services Project Coordinator#
7'
-77,', >§
I
$5,313
$6,487
$6989
Community Services Specialist
4350
$2,516
4390
$3,072
$3,311
Community Services Superintendent*
2536
$6,3592576
$7,763
250 I
$8,366
Community Services Supervisor#
$4,809
$5,871
3535
$6,326
Community Services Technician
4437
$3,883
4427
$4,741
4492
1,57
$5,109
Community Services Manager*
7
$5,475
$6,684
2561
$7203
Community Svc Marketing Manager*
$6,359
25Z
$7,763
$8,366
Cultural Arts Manager*
$5,475
-"-',`4J6-
$6,684
$7,203
Deputy City Clerk#
3430
$3,748
11
$4,575
$4,930
Deputy Dir. of Innovation and Technology
$7,09659
$8,6633
fit;
$9,336
Engineering Aide
$3,585
00
$4,3778
$4,717
Engineering Technician
444
$3,962
5"17"
$4,836
$5,212
Environmental Programs Coordinator#
$5,394
$6,584
$7,095
Environmental Programs Ins ector24464
$4,443
$5,424
$5,846
Environmental Programs Manager*
$6,455
N';-
Q
$7,880254
$8,492
Executive Assistant *2460
$4,353
$5,314
$5726
Facilities Superintendent*
$6 ,359
112,
$7,763
$8,366
Fleet Supervisor#2
X3488
$5,005
$6,110
M
$6,583
Fund Development Coordinator#
$4,574350
$5,584
$6,018
GIS Analyst
$4,062
$5,212
10
$5,617
GIS Technician
4436
$3,864
4475
$4,717
-$5,084
GIS Supervisor#
$5,870
3565
g'
$7,347
$7,918
Human Resources Clerk
4389
$3,057
$3,732
-
4 �gK,7
$4,021
Human Resources Manager*
$8,039
$9,814
$10,575
Human Resources Technician4399
$3,213
$3,9224
0
$4,227
Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association January 11, 2016
U61101
Resolution No. 15-218
RCCEA COVERED EMPLOYEES IN THE
MID MANAGER, SUPERVISORY/PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL EMPLOYEES GROUPS
ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES
Monthly Pay Ranges Effective January 11, 2016
Minimum Control Point Maximum
Information Technology Analyst 1#
3505
$5,448
1
$6,650
3560
$7,166
Information Technology Analyst 11#
X3520
$5,871
$7,167
5
$7,723
Information Technology Specialist 1
$4,269
$5,212
$5,617
Information Technology Specialist 11
13 447J
$4,601
$5,617
56
$6,053
Information Technology Technician
4411
$3,411
A
$4,164
$4,488
Librarian I#
777 ,
$3,842
3415
$4,691
7
$5,054
Librarian II#
$4,288
349
$5,235
$5,640
Library Assistant 1#
'15
$2,820
j
$3,443
X328
$3,710
-$4,552
Library Assistant 11#
34
$3,460
$4,224469
Library Clerk4356
$2,593
$3,165
7,
3,411
$
-$1,951
Library Page
424
$1,483
$1,810
4299
Library Page 11
4293
$1,894
$2,312
s.
$ 2,491
Library Services Manager*
2506
$5,475
256
$6,684
X256
$7,203
Library Technician
4393
$3,116
4433
-$-3,804
3K--$4,103
Maintenance Supervisor#2
3488
$5,005
$6,110
3543
$6,583
Management Aide
$3,942
$4,812
$ 186
5,
Management Analyst 1#
X3470
$4,574
$5,584
$6018
Management Analyst II#
NO
$5,2615
$6,422
$6,920
Management Analyst III#
$5,726
3555
$6,991
$7,532
Office Services Clerk
4.369
$2,766
J!
$3,3774
$3,640
Office Specialist I
A
,4349',
$2,504
$ 3,057
--$3,294
qT�7
Office Specialist 11
$2,766
$3,377
$3,640
Park/Landscape Maintenance SUPt*2
$6,359
$7,763
2�3
$8,366
Payroll Supervisor#
$4,575
10
$5,585
X32
$6,018
Plan Check & Inspection Manager*
2533
$6,264573
$7,64858;.
J�
$8,241
Planning Commission Secretary#
3444
$4,019
$4,906
X3499
$5,286
Planning Manager*
7583
$8,039
$9,8148
$10,575
Planning Specialist
$4,001
3S
$4,885
X4498
$5,264
Planning Technician
4.423 v
$3,621
4
$4,421$
$4,765
-$6,389
Plans Examiner#
7
$4,857
352
$5,930
Principal Librarian*
$5,183
3'
$6,327
$6,818
Principal Management Analyst*
$6,585
$8,039
$8,663
Principal Engineer*
$7,422
$9,061
28 2
$9,764
Principal Planner*
72537
,-$6,391
2577
$7,802
$8,407
Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association January 11, 2016
P100
Resolution No. 15-218
RCCEA COVERED EMPLOYEES IN THE
MID MANAGER, SUPERVISORY/PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL EMPLOYEES GROUPS
ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES
Monthly Pay Ranges Effective January 11, 2016
Minimum Control Point Maximum
Public Services Technician 1
00,
$3,445
X443
$4,206
$4,533
Public Services Technician 11
$3,621
4463
$4,421
$4,765
Public Services Technician 111
$4,001
,@A
$4,885
$5,264
Public Works Inspector 12
$4,021
3-1-1-1 "$4,-,
g
g
$4,909
$5291
Public Works Inspector 112
$4,443
$5,4249
$5,846
Public Works Maintenance Manager*
$7,385
016
-!S2
$9,716
Public Works Safety Coordinator #2
$4,530
$5,530
$5,958
Purchasing Clerk
'7- 43 4
$2,836
u4414
$3,462
1114', 1ffff
$3,732
Purchasing Manager*
3530
$6,171250
$7,534
$8,119
rr
Records Clerk
$2,619
$3,197
p7-7-
777',', 4e
$3,445
Records Coordinator
7g7-7
$3,011%
4426
$3,6764441
r
$3962
-$6,018
Risk Management Coordinator#
$4,575
7,77
$5,585
77-7-
Secretary'
4394
$3,134
4434
$3,826
X449
$4,123
Senior Account Clerk
4395
$3,149
-$3,845
$4,144
Senior Account Technician
4446
$4,062
8
$4,958
$5,344
Senior Accountant#
$5,261
$6,422
6,920
Senior Administrative Secretary'
7,
$4,021
$4,909
1
$5291
Senior Animal Services Officerft
3461
$4,374
3
$5,340
TE W-ffi
$5,754
Q,
Senior Building Inspector #2
ig-p"77 4-
$1
$4,906
35
$5,989
7M
$6,453
Senior Buyer#
$4,418
$5,394
$5,812
Senior Civil Engineer*
2547
$6,717R2v87
$8,201260
$8,837
Senior Community Improvement Officer#
A 3461
$4,374
$5,340
$5,754
Senior Electrician #
X3485
$4,930
3525
$6,019
X3540
$6,486
Senior GIS Analyst #
4
$4,9063524
$5,989
p
$6,453
Senior GIS Technician
$4,270
$5,212
$5,617
Senior Information Technology Analyst#
3535 ,
$6,327
q 375a
$7 ,724
$8,323
Senior Information Technology Specialist
$5,1354533
$6,268
45s
$6,755
Senior Librarian#
$4,5303508
$5,530
X3333,,
$5,958
_
Senior Park Planner#
3500
$5,313SSOr
$6,487
355
$6,989
Senior Planner*
Isli-25
$5,784
25s
$7,061
$7609
Senior Plans Examiner#
3497
$5,235
3537
$6,390
$6,886
Senior Risk Management Analyst#
351
$5,725
$6,989
$7,532
Senior Special Districts Technician
4443
$4,001
34483
$4,885
4'
4
$5,264
Special Districts Analyst#
3498
$5,261
1
6422
$6,920
r
Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association January 11, 2016
Orel
Resolution No. 15-218
RCCEA COVERED EMPLOYEES IN THE
MID MANAGER, SUPERVISORY/PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL EMPLOYEES GROUPS
ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES
Monthly Pay Ranges Effective January 11, 2016
Minimum Control Point Maximum
Special Districts Technician47
$3,8834
7
$4,741
X92
$5,109
Street/Storm Drain Maintenance SUpt*2
Ug,-2-
$6,359
$7,763
S, _0
—
$8366
—$6,783
Supervising Public Works Ins ector#z
3494
$5,15735
$6,295
Theater Production Coordinator
g 4460
$4,3554500
$5,317
$5,730
Theater Production Supervisor#
T —�
$4,809
$5,871
"
_q 3`6
$6,326
Theatre Technician 111
, d
$3,6214463
$4,421
%
$4,765
Traffic Engineer*
X569,
$7,496
,2
$9,152
$9,862
Utilities Division Manager*
$8,079
$9,863
$10,628
Utility Operations Manager*
2524
$5,989564
7
--$7,312257P
$7,880
Veterinarian*
$7,880
$9,620
!011!g-12
$10,367
Veterinary Assistant
$3,344
11-1-1
$4,082
11
$4,399
Veterinary Technician
4437
$3,883
$4,741
' 4
$5,109
1 When acting as Clerk to Commissions $50 paid per night or weekend day meeting. Compensatory time off can be substituted in
lieu of $50 at the option of the employee.
2 Refer to MOU for provision of boot allowance.
# Denotes Supervisory/Professional Class
* Denotes Management Class
Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association January 11, 2016
211%
Resolution No. 15-218
PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE EMPLOYEES
Represented By
S4
X�
ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES
Monthly Pay Ranges Effective January 11, 2016
Minimum Control Point Maximum
Class Title
Step v,
Amount
~ Step
AmountStep
m,
Amount
Electrician
5457 r
$4,287
549
$5,234
$5,641
Equipment Operator
5425
$3,655
Q
$4,462
$4,809
Inventory Specialist Equipment/Mat
Nq 58891
$3,054
54
$3,729444
$4,018
OR,
Lead Maintenance Worker
$3,7295459
$4,552
484
$4,905
Lead Mechanic
5440 r
$3,939
$4808
$5,182
Maintenance Coordinator
5452
$4,182
Y 5492
105
-31-g
$5,502
Maintenance Worker
5391
$3,085
$3,766
54A
$4059
Mechanic
5480
$3,747547Q
$4,574
585r
$4,930
Senior Maintenance Worker
5401
$3243
$3,95 8
5456
$4,266
Signal & Lighting Coordinator
479-'
$5,8415584
$6,295
Signal & Lighting Technician
$4,182
5492 r
$5,105
5507 =
$5,502
Public Works Maintenance
Employees
January 11, 2016
P103
Resolution No. 15-218
PART-TIME CITY POSITIONS
ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES
Hourly Pay Ranges Effective January 11, 2016
Minimum Control Point Maximum
Part Time Positions
Amount
Amount
Amount
Account Clerk
6368=
$15.87
$19.37
$20.36
Account Technician
6423
20.88
$25.49
6473
26.79
Accountant
6465
25.75
6605
31.43
$33.04
Administrative Intern
1463`2p
12.48
$15.24
637p
16.03
Animal Care Attendant
639
14.43
X389
17.62
$18.52
Animal Caretaker
77-
TIE
$16.69
W- t,*11,
$2038
IRM
$21,42
Animal Handler
6388
17.54
6428
I645$
22.50
Animal License Canvasser
$10.03
3,161'
$11.65
W'�
311,
9R
$12.25
Animal Services Dispatcher
6369
15.95
$19.47
X649
20.46
Animal Services Officer
6441.
$22.84
,,,Z
$27.88
$29.31
Assistant Engineer
$28.88
6528a ==
35.25
$37.05
Assistant Planner
,6
$ 26.13
$31.9
]1,6 7
$3354
Assistant Pool Manager
68 '06"e-
$11.60
$1416
6
$14.87
Associate Engineer
bt 61',,
$33.53
X6558:
$43.03
Associate Planner
$28.73
X6527
35.07
-E)
$368 6
Box Office Assistant
$10.76
-633p
tr,634p
13.81
Box Office Specialist
6311
11.95
$14.58
79361
$15.33
Budget Anal st6498=
30.35
6538
37.05
1
$3 8.95
Building Inspector
$25.61
$31.27
$32.87
Business License Clerk
$16.69
$20.38
21.42
Community Improvement Officer I
ik' 6421
20.67
J; 11-
$25.34
64716
26.53
Community Improvement Officer 11
�>� _ Nt
44f "'
$22.84
--ir-64"
$27.88
36491
29.31
Community Programs Coordinator
$23.89
79490
$29.16
,3 6500
30.66
Community Programs Specialist
$22,39
$27.33
$28.73
Community Services Coordinator
23.89
4,
$29.16
t 6,
$30.66
Community Services Specialist
$14.51
:2163'
$17.71
640p
$18.62
Community Services Supervisor
$27.75
$33.87
75-
35.60
Community Services Technician
6437 ~
22.39
Af
$27.33
$28.73
Department Director
$42.17
$51.50
1607
86.92
Department Manager
$34.73
V 6566
42.60
117 6634
59.81
Deputy City Clerk
$21.62
-i"E
$26.40
V64W
$27.75
Division Supervisor
$20.16
"S7 4672-1
$24.74
%654
$40.13
Electrician
6457
24.74
6497
30.20
6507
$31.75
Energy Efficiency Coordinator
6372.
16.19
$19.77
X6422
20.78
Engineering Aide
$20.67
646Ixr
$25.24
6471
26.53
Engineering Technician
6441 ==
22.84
6481
27.88
7K", 6491 n
29.31
Environmental Resources Intern
$10.23
k,632p
12.48
$13.13
Equipment Operator
21.09
-16446
$25.75
M&W.
$27.06
GIS Pro c rammer/Analyst
x
$24.61
$30.05
65 061
31.58
GIS Intern
632p
12.48
636p
15.24
X6370
16.03
GIS Technician
6436.1
$22.28
"V!,, t
$27.20
71116-0-
$28.59
Healthy Cities Coordinator
X6372 N
$16.19
64 -'f2
19.776422
20.78
Human Resources Clerk
26,
V 7.62
6429..6
21.51
$22.61
City Part-Time Hourly Pay Ranges
January 11, 2016
211111
Resolution No. 15-218
PART-TIME CITY POSITIONS
ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES
Hourly Pay Ranges Effective January 11, 2016
Minimum Control Point Maximum
Part Time Positions
Am unt
Amount
Amount
Human Resources Technician
6399
18.52
22.61
6449
23.77
Instructor/Guard 1
$10.03
75-W
$10.23
--' 06-206621,
$10.76
Instructor/Guard 11
$10.23
$12.48
11-1
$13.13
Lead Mechanic
$22.73
A
$27.75
!,,-,,r
$29.16
Library Aide
X6276 =
10.03
A 627
10.09
X6287
10.59
Librarian I
6433 e,,,3,,
$21.95
16473
--
APW
$28.16
Library Assistant 1
X6362
15.41
6402,s
18.81
642
19.77
Library Assistant 11
$18.99
0W 6444T
23.20
$24.37
Library Clerk
6346s
14.22
639
$18.25
Library Director/SIF Trainer
$50.48
$61.63
A,'
1 $64.78
Library Page
$10.03
$10.09
1,51"
$10.59
Library Page 11
28 1 02
$10.23
$12A8
170637,
$13.13
Library Technician
$17.98
$21.95
23.07
Maintenance Technician
$10.23
$12.48
$13.13
Management Aide
$22.73
$27.75
$29.16
Management Analyst 1
6470=
26.40
65 IQ=
32.22
$33.87
Management Analyst 11
1`6408j
$30.35
"IF, 89
$37.05
38.95
Mechanic
:6430:
21.62647Qm
26.40
27.75
Office Services Clerk
$ 15.95
77=7
8:7 6409,(z�",
19.41
4
$2047
Office Specialist 1
$13.25
X6372
16.19
6382
17.02
Office Specialist 11
X6352
14.65
$17.89
01
$18.80
Outreach Technician
5
$11.95
6351
14,58-79W-$15.33
Park Ranger
X6352 =
$14.65
$17.89
$18,80
Planning Aide
$12.48
-2'
$15.24
it
..... ..........
16.03
Planning Manager
$46.37
It, 66M
56.62
$59.51
Playschool Instructor
63 �,fii;
, 1"j
siT95
79��
$14.58
$15.33
Pool Manager
$13.07
8,
$15�9 5
6379
16.76
Principal Engineer
6567
42.82
52.77
6617
54.95
Program Specialist
6311
11.95
$14.58
$15.33
Public Services Technician 1
$19.86
7
$24.25
7§5-
$ 25.49
Public Services Technician 11
$20.88
ZE" 6463
25.49
6473.
26-79
Public Services Technician 111
6443
23.07
6483=
28.16
6493
29.60
Public Works Inspector I
$23.19
X6484
$28.31
X6494
$29.75
Public Works Inspector 11
7
_04
$25.62
$31.27
$32.87
Purchasing Clerk
$15.87
6408ry
$19.37
$20.37
Receptionist
$13.94
$17.02 -7'--$17.89
639
Records Clerk
a,6840EF]
$14.08
X6384
17.19
Ili' 6394.
18.08
Records Coordinator
433721,,!
$16.19
11
$19.77
W422."
$20-78
Recreation Attendant
$10.03
4`8
$10-09
14--- _6,77,V-
1" 2
$10.59
Recreation Assistant
7
$10.03
i 6306 "
11.65
$12.26
Recreation Leader
$ 10.76
13
$ .13
7- 77 4011
$13.81
Secretar
6394
18.07
�2-5MV4
$ 22.06
IS
$23.18
City Part-Time Hourly Pay Ranges
January 11, 2016
UIDIN
Resolution No. 15-218
PART-TIME CITY POSITIONS
ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES
Hourly Pay Ranges Effective January 11, 2016
Minimum Control Point Maximum
Part Time Positions
Amount
Amount
Amount
Senior Accountant
$30.35
37.05
$38.95
Senior Civil Engineer
654 F
37.99
X6583 46.37
1 6
48.75
Signal and Lighting Technician
1645_2Q1-;,1
$24.12
IN', $29.46
`t12
Sports Official
511 6311r
11.95
6 14.58
Ira 661
15.33
Swim Aide
16276
10.03
1 .6606 11.65
i4163-116W-,
$12.26
Theatre Technician 1
1-6311
71, 63 $14.58
11 631
15.33
Theatre Technician 11
$16.19
6412 19.77
IPW
$20.78
Veterinarian
$45.46
'--i"6619 55.50669
7
58.33
Veterinary Assistant
$19.27
i $23.52
$24.74
Veterinary Technician
3-7,a'
$22.40
$27.33
176487.:''
$28.73
City Part-Time Hourly Pay Ranges
January 11, 2016
P106
PART -TIME EMPLOYEE BENEFITS SUMMARY
ADOPTED PER RESOLUTION NO. 15 -218
DECEMBER 16, 2015
The following benefits are approved via resolution by the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga effective the first full pay period in January 2016.
All part -time employees are employed "at- will" and serve at the pleasure of the appointing
authority. As such, their services can be discontinued without cause or right of appeal.
Each Department determines the number of part -time employees required in order to meet their
needs depending on their approved budget for part -time employees and the approval of the City
Manager
In general, part -time employees are only eligible for mandated State and Federal benefits except
for specifically designated Work Life Balance Part -time employees as outlined below under the
"Work -life Balance Section."
Definition — PART -TIME EMPLOYEE: A person serving in a budgeted position of less than forty
(40) hours per week on average over a year, and typically less than 1,040 hours per year as
further defined under City of Rancho Cucamonga Personnel Rules and Regulations Rule XIV
(Part-Time, Seasonal and Temporary Employees). Part -time employees are at -will and may be
terminated without cause or right of appeal.
Retirement Benefits — The City either provides access to retirement benefits through the
Accumulation Program for Part -Time Limited - service Employees (APPLE) or the California Public
Employees Retirement System (CaIPERS) as outlined below.
APPLE — Part-time employees who work less than 1,000 hours in a fiscal year, are not a current
CaIPERS Member or who otherwise do not qualify for CaIPERS retirement benefits under State
law or CaIPERS regulations must contribute 7.5% of base pay to APPLE — a required alternative
retirement system.
CaIPERS — Part-time employees who work 1,000 hours or more in a fiscal year, are hired to work
more than 20 hours per week on average, are current CaIPERS Members or who otherwise would
qualify for CaIPERS retirement benefits under State law or CaIPERS regulations must contribute
the full employee member contribution towards their CaIPERS retirement benefits and "New
Members" as defined by CaIPERS must pay half the normal cost.
The CaIPERS retirement benefits available for qualifying part-time employees depend on the date
the employee qualified for CaIPERS benefits.
Tier 1 Part-time Employees who qualified for CaIPERS benefits before July 3, 2011
§ 21354.4 2.5% at 55 Full Formula
§ 21574 4th Level 1959 Survivor
§ 20042 1 Year Final Compensation
Tier 2 Part-time Employees who qualified for CaIPERS benefits on or after July 4, 2011 and
before January 1, 2013
§ 21354 2% @ 55 Full Formula
§ 21574 4th Level 1959 Survivor
§ 20037 3 Year Final Compensation
PART-TIME EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SUMMARY
ADOPTED PER RESOLUTION No. 15-218
DECEMBER15'2015
glob
Tier Part-time Employees not considered "New K88[Db8rs" by Ca|PER8 who qualified for
Ca|PERO benefits on or After January 1. 2013
§21354 296@55 Full Formula
821574 4th Level 1959 Survivor
§20037 3 Year Final Compensation
Tier Part-time Employees meeting the C8|PERG definition 0f "New Members" who qualified for
Co|pERG benefits onor After January 1.2013
§7532.2O 296@82 Full Formula
07522.32 3O Consecutive Months
87522.10 Based on Pensionable Compensation
Unit members hired on and after January 1. 2013. deemed to be a "new member" as defined in
Government Code §7522.O4' shall individually pay an initial Member C|/\LPERG contribution rate
of 50% of the normal cost rate for the Defined Benefit Plan in which said "new member" is enrolled,
rounded to the nearest quarter Of 196' or the current contribution rote of SiOn1|ar|y situated
employees, whichever iSgreater. This rate can increase based onC8|PER8regulations.
The City does not participate in GOCia| Security except for the nn3Dd8tUry Medicare Program.
Medical Insurance Benefits —Tho City provides access to rnedioo| insurance for port-time
employees who qualify for the Affordable Care Act (ACA) under the City's policy,
In genoro|, employees who vvO[k 50 or more hours per week OO @Ve[Gg8 per year would qualify,
but the City's policy and the federal |8Vv determine who specifically qualifies for these benefits.
For those part- time employees who qualify for this benefit, the City contributes the cost of the
lowest cost self only coverage minus 9.5% of the Federal Poverty Line towards the cost of medical
insurance.
For example:
In 2014. the FPL was $972.50 per month, and 9.5% of that is 92,38/nlonth. In 2014. the
lowest cost self-only coverage cost was B|U8 Shield Silver — PPO costing $423.00 per
month. Following the policy, the City would pay $33O.O2 towards any health care plan the
ACA eligible part-time employee chooses and the employee would pay the difference,
which for the lowest cost self-only coverage would be $92.38.
Page 2 of 4
PART -TIME EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SUMMARY
ADOPTED PER RESOLUTION NO. 15 -218
DECEMBER 16, 2015
=06]
WORK -LIFE BALANCE PART -TIME EMPLOYEES BENEFITS
FOR SPECIFICALLY DESIGNATED POSITION
Specifically designated Part -time employees in specific management, supervisory, professional
and /or confidential type positions, as designated by the City Manager and noted on the Personnel
Action Report, who are scheduled to work 32 hours per week on a year -round basis, are referred
to as work -life balance part -time employees. The City Manager will review and if appropriate
amend the list of designated work life balance employees at least once per year as part of his /her
budget review process. Work -life balance part -time employees participate in the State and
Federally required benefits as enumerated above and shall receive the following additional
benefits:
Medical Insurance: In accordance with the City's ACA policy, work -life balance part -time
employees are eligible to participate in the City's medical plan.
The City will pay the higher of the ACA policy contribution or 80% of the cost the City would pay
for a full -time employee in the same position towards medical insurance premium costs. In 2013,
the maximum the City would pay for medical insurance would be $700 for a full time employee
hired after 1994, so following this policy a work -life balance part -time employee would receive
$560 towards the cost of the medical coverage that they choose.
Dental Insurance: City paid
Vision: City Paid
Life Insurance: City Paid $30,000 base coverage
Vacation: Work -life balance part -time employees accrue vacation hours at 80% of the rate of full -
time employees in the same position. Work -life balance part -time employees can accumulate
vacation hours up to two times the highest annual accrual rate that full -time employees in the
same position can earn. Once they reach their maximum accrual rate they stop earning vacation
hours until they bring their vacation hours below the maximum accrual rate. Work -life balance
employees may only cash out vacation hours upon separation from the City. Work -life balance
part -time employees transitioning from a full -time position with the City of Rancho Cucamonga
may either cash out their vacation per their MOU or carry over their accrued vacation balance to
the work -life balance part -time position.
Sick Leave: Work -life balance part -time employees accrue 8 hours of sick leave per month. No
cash out or buyback of sick leave is provided to work -life balance part -time employees. Work -life
balance part -time employees transitioning from a full -time position with the City of Rancho
Cucamonga may either cash out their sick leave per their MOU or carry over their accrued sick
leave balance to the work -life balance part -time position.
Page 3 of 4
PART -TIME EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SUMMARY
ADOPTED PER RESOLUTION NO. 15 -218
DECEMBER16,2015
a"101
Holidays: Work -life balance part -time employees will be compensated for normally scheduled
working hours, when they fall on official City holidays. The City observes 11 holidays per year:
Independence Day, Labor Day, Veteran's Day, Thanksgiving Day and the day following,
Christmas Eve, Christmas Day, New Year's Day, Martin Luther King's Birthday, President's Day
and Memorial Day.
Deferred Compensation Plans: Work -life balance part -time employees are eligible to participate
in the City's deferred compensation plans. The City does not contribute.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING ALL PART -TIME POSITIONS
Effective July 1, 2015, all part -time employees earn and can use sick leave in accordance with
the City's Paid Sick Leave Policy, which is in agreement with California's Healthy
Workplaces /Healthy Families Act of 2014.
Medicare: Employees hired after 1/1/86, are required to contribute 1.45% of their earnings.
All Part -Time employees are subject to specific provisions of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Personnel Rules and Regulations (Rule XIV) and specific provisions of the Policy and Procedures
Manual (Policy 200 -01) that apply to them.
Page 4 of 4
Pilo
PART -TIME EMPLOYEE'S UNIFORM BENEFITS
ADOPTED PER RESOLUTION NO. 15 -218
December 16, 2015
The following part -time employee's uniform benefits are approved via resolution by the City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga effective the first full pay period in January 2015.
The City may provide uniforms (including shirts) and /or maintenance of uniforms for the following
part -time positions: Animal Care Attendant, Animal Caretaker, Animal Handler, Animal License
Canvasser, Animal Services Dispatcher, Animal Services Officer, Assistant Pool Manager, Box
Office Assistant, Box Office Specialist, Building Inspector, Business License Clerk, Community
Improvement Officer I, Community Improvement Officer II, Community Programs Coordinator,
Community Programs Specialist, Community Services Coordinator, Community Services
Specialist, Community Services Supervisor, Community Services Technician, Electrician, Energy
Efficiency Coordinator, Engineering Aide, Environmental Resources Intern, Equipment Operator,
Healthy Cities Coordinator, Instructor /Guard I, Instructor /Guard 11, Lead Mechanic, Library Aide,
Librarian I, Library Assistant I, Library Assistant 11, Library Clerk, Library Page, Library Page II,
Library Technician, Maintenance Technician, Management Aide, Mechanic, Outreach
Technician, Park Ranger, Planning Aide, Playschool Instructor, Pool Manager, Public Services
Technician I, Public Services Technician 11, Public Services Technician III, Public Works Inspector
I, Public Works Inspector 11, Purchasing Clerk, Recreation Attendant, Recreation Assistant,
Recreation Leader, Signal and Lighting Technician, Sports Official, Swim Aide, Theatre
Technician 1, Theatre Technician 11, Veterinarian, Veterinary Assistant, and Veterinary Technician.
The City reports to CaIPERS on a semiannual basis the actual value of compensation paid or the
monetary value for the purchase, rental and /or maintenance of required clothing for part -time
CalPERS Classic Members. The parties analyzed the value and determined it shall not exceed
$50.00 per fiscal year. The parties agree that to the extent permitted by law, this is special
compensation and shall be reported as such pursuant to Title 2 CCR, Section 571(a)(5) Statutory
Items. The parties also agree that the City has no additional obligation or costs should CalPERS,
the State, or the IRS determine otherwise.
P111
•
RANCHO) CUC_ NIONGA POLICE DEPARTMENT
DATE: November 17, 2015
Mayor and Members of the City Council
TO: John Gillison, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Danielle Boldt, Police Chief
Frank Montanez, Lieutenant
BY: Steve Wolff, Detective
t_
RANCHO
UCAMONGA
SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE FIXED POSITION AUTOMATIC LICENSE PLATE
READER CAMERAS IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000.00 FROM FEDERAL ASSET
SEIZURE FUNDS, ACCOUNT 1197701.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval for the purchase of fixed position automatic license plate reader (ALPR)
cameras to be deployed at Foothill and Day Creek. The ALPR cameras will be purchased with
Federal Asset Seizure funds, Account 1197701, in the amount of $100,000.00.
-•
In the fall of 2014, the Police Department with the approval of the City Council embarked on an
initial deployment of both mobile and fixed ALPR cameras. The patrol fleet was equipped with ten
4- Cameras mobile ALPR platforms and the intersections located just north of the Interstate 210 off
ramps were equipped with fixed camera platforms. Data from these cameras is loaded into a
shared database maintained by the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department and is used
routinely to search for a variety of felony subjects associated with criminal activity occurring within
the region. These cameras have proven to be very effective in the solving of felony crimes since
their deployment in the spring of 2015.
The proposed deployment is an expansion of the existing ALPR footprint envisioned for the City of
Rancho Cucamonga. The equipment will be deployed at Day Creek and Foothill to monitor
westbound traffic on Foothill and northbound traffic on Day Creek. The data from these cameras
will continue to be used to investigate and solve crimes occurring within the region.
The San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department named Vigilant Solutions as the sole source
vendor for ALPR related technology in mid -2014. As a result, the Rancho Cucamonga Police
Department was obligated to use Vigilant Solutions for the initial deployment of ALPR equipment.
Since that initial deployment, Vigilant has proven itself to be a reliable vendor with a well- functioning
solution that meets and exceeds our needs. This proposed deployment is an expansion of the
initial deployment and as such relies on the existing components and technology which is unique to
this vendor.
OEM
.\UTHORIZATION T{)P[ou-u,\SCP/xDn plATeuz�\DCxCAxoOR\8 P,\(C2
lNT/UK£JV(}UbJI()y$lOO.0U8.0O FROM pBl)ED.\Lz\SSBI SEIZURE FUNDS, ACCOUNT
1197701.
N0rT'mBuu17,2015
SYSTEM COST AND RECURRING COSTS
The cost Of$1OO.00O.00 provides fixed camera coverage for all westbound lanes of Foothill 81Day
Creek and all northbound lanes of Day Creek 8t Foothill. This cost includes tax, delivery, CUStODl
installation and extended warrant for 3years. Recurring costs for the hosted data storage will apply
8S additional cameras are added tO the system.
Vigilant {]UOt8dOO-MRO-0079-02 Foothill VVB @ Day Creek Rev 1.Dd[
Vigilant {]uOL8tiOn-P{RC-0080-02 D8yCr88k NB @ Foothill Rev 1.pCK
SO|8 Source Justification FO[Dl
P113
PROJECT QUOTATION
We at Vigilant Solutions are pleased to quote the following systems for the above referenced project:
Qty
Model #
Description
(1)
Fixed LPR SYS -1
Vigilant Fixed LPR Camera with Integrated Smart Processor
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
(4)VSF- 075 -H -RE
Hardware:
• Integrated (Internal) solid state DSP Smart processor units - No moving parts
o Plug -N -Play IP based camera with Power Over Ethernet (POE)
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
$300.00
• Includes field installed J -Box
• 75mm LPR Camera(s) with IR and Color video
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
1 $3,400.00
o Includes RAM mounting bracket
Software:
• Direct connect to Vigilant's nationally hosted LEARN LPR data server
o Includes CarDetector LPR software for local server hosting
• LPR vehicle license plate scanning / real time alerting
o Full suite of LPR tools including data analytics
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
1 $26,280.00
Qty
Model #
Description
(1)
VS- COM -NE -RE
Vigilant Communications Box - NEMA -4 enclosure
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
FIELD PLUG
• For use with Reaper LPR systems only
• NEMA Enclosure with integrated 4- channel PoE
• GPS NTP server for time & synchronization
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
$300.00
• Universal AC /DC power inputs, DC output for backup battery power
• Supports up to four (4) cameras
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
1 $3,400.00
Qty
Model #
Description
(4)
CAT6A M12 X -CODED
CAT6A M12 Connector
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
FIELD PLUG
• Required for extending Reaper camera cable length
• Used in conjunction with RJ45 Field Plug - Sold Separately
• Additional CAT6 cable not included
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
$300.00
Qty
Model #
Description
(4)
VS- FX -UNI -POLE-
WALL -BRKT
Fixed LPR Camera Bracket
• Pole or Wall Mount
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
$1,396.00
Qty I Model # I Description
(1)
VS- LEARN - -H
Vigilant Hosted /Managed Centralized LPR server via LEARN
(3)
VSBSCSVC -04
• Vigilant hosted /managed LEARN account
o Central repository for all LPR data acquired by each LPR system
• Includes Vigilant's suite of LPR data analytics via online web access
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
$1,500.00
• Automated CarDetector software update management
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
$0.00
• Plate searching, mapping, data mining utilities
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
1 $3,000.00
• Stakeout, Associate Analysis and Locate Analysis
• Full administrative security with management auditing
• Plug -N -Play an unlimited number of CarDetector LPR systems
o Requires NO server hardware, NO server maintenance
• Requires Vigilant Enterprise Service Agreement contract
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
1 $0.00
Qty
Model #
Description
(3)
VSBSCSVC -04
Vigilant LPR Basic Service Package for Hosted /Managed LPR Deployments
• Managed /hosted server account services by Vigilant
o Includes access to all LEARN and CarDetector software updates
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
$1,500.00
• Priced per camera per year for over 60 total camera units
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
$0.00
• Requires new /existing Enterprise Service Agreement (ESA)
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
1 $3,000.00
Qty
Model #
Description
(1)
TAS -UL
Target Alert Service - LPR Alert Delivery Software - Unlimited User
• Real Time LPR notification and mapping software sends LPR alerts to any in- network PC
• Send Alerts over any communication protocol including LAN, WAN, internet wireless, etc.
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
$1,500.00
• Server Client software compatible with all Vigilant CDFS applications
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
$0.00
Qty
Model #
Description
(4)
SSU- SYS -COM
Vigilant System Start Up & Commissioning of'In Field' LPR system
• Vigilant technician to visit customer site
• Includes system start up, configuration and commissioning of LPR system
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
$1,500.00
• Applies to mobile (1 System) and fixed (1 Camera) LPR systems
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
1 $3,400.00
Qty
Model #
Description
(1)
VS- TRVL -01
Vigilant Travel via Client Site Visit
• Vigilant certified technician to visit client site
• Includes all travel costs for onsite support services
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
$1,500.00
Qty
Model #
Description
(4)
CDFS -2HWW
Fixed Camera LPR System - Extended Hardware Warranty - Year 2 & 3
• Fixed LPR System LPR hardware component replacement warranty
• Applies to 1- Channel hardware system kit
• Valid for 2 years from standard warranty expiration
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
1 $4,000.00
Qty
Model #
Description
(4)
VS- SHP -02
Vigilant Shipping & Handling Charges
• Applies to each fixed camera LPR System
• Shipping Method is FOB Destination
fi[!
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax) 1 $220.00 115
Qty
Model #
Description
(1)
VS- SUBLET -INS
Installation of 4 Reaper fixed cameras and 1 communication box
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax) 1
$3,883.50
Qty
Model #
Description
(1)
Tax
I Tax at 8.25% on equipment
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
1 $2,588.52
Quote Notes:
1. All prices are quoted in USD and will remain firm and in effect for 60 days.
2. No permits, start-up, installation, and or service included in this proposal unless explicitly stated above.
3. Central compute resource hardware sold separately unless explicitly stated above.
4. All hardware components to have standard One (1) year hardware warranty.
5. All software to have standard one (1) year warranty for manufacturer defects.
6. Compatibility with Vigilant Solutions hardware /software to be confirmed prior to sale.
7. Software is manufactured under strict Vigilant Solutions standard.
8. Compliance to local codes neither guaranteed nor implied.
9. All orders subject to credit acceptance by Vigilant Solutions management.
I O.This Quote is provided per our conversation & details given by you - not in accordance to any written specification.
I I .This Quote does not include anything outside the above stated bill of materials.
12.Quote assumes 110 constant power is easily accessible.
13.Quote assumes network is easily accessible or air cards will be furnished by customer.
14.Work performed between 8 -5 M -F.
Quoted by: Kris Robinson - 949 - 525 -3326 - kris .robinson @vigilantsolutions.com
Total Price (Excluding sales tax)
$49,968.02
Accepted By:
I Date:
P.O#
P116
Vigilant Solutions
2021 Las Positas Court - Suite # 101 Protecting ffic r- , Families
VIGILANT Livermore, CA 94551 and Comiiiutiities
S L U T ` r) N S (P) 949 - 525 -3326 (F) 925 - 398 -2113
Attention: ASan Bernardino Sheriff- Rancho Station Date 1 11/12/2015
Project Name: I Fixed Day Creek NB at Foothill (Rev 1) Quote Number: I KRO- 0080 -02
r�za»�rr�hr•J►rrrr•�i
We at Vigilant Solutions are pleased to quote the following systems for the above referenced project:
Qty
Model #
Description
(1)
Fixed LPR SYS -1
Vigilant Fixed LPR Camera with Integrated Smart Processor
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
(4)VSF- 075 -H -RE
Hardware:
• Integrated (Internal) solid state DSP Smart processor units - No moving parts
o Plug -N -Play IP based camera with Power Over Ethernet (POE)
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
1 $300.00
• Includes field installed J -Box
• 75mm LPR Camera(s) with IR and Color video
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
1 $3,400.00
o Includes RAM mounting bracket
Software:
• Direct connect to Vigilant's nationally hosted LEARN LPR data server
o Includes CarDetector LPR software for local server hosting
• LPR vehicle license plate scanning / real time alerting
o Full suite of LPR tools including data analytics
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
1 $26,280.00
Qty
Model #
Description
(1)
VS- COM -NE -RE
Vigilant Communications Box - NEMA -4 enclosure
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
FIELD PLUG
• For use with Reaper LPR systems only
• NEMA Enclosure with integrated 4- channel PoE
• GPS NTP server for time & synchronization
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
1 $300.00
• Universal AC /DC power inputs, DC output for backup battery power
• Supports up to four (4) cameras
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
1 $3,400.00
Qty
Model #
Description
(4)
CAT6A M12 X -CODED
CAT6A M12 Connector
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
FIELD PLUG
• Required for extending Reaper camera cable length
• Used in conjunction with RJ45 Field Plug - Sold Separately
• Additional CAT6 cable not included
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
1 $300.00
Qty
Model #
Description
(4)
VS- FX -UNI -POLE-
WALL -BRKT
Fixed LPR Camera Bracket
• Pole or Wall Mount
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
1 $1,396.00
Qty I Model # I Description
(1)
VS- LEARN - -H
Vigilant Hosted /Managed Centralized LPR server via LEARN
(3)
VSBSCSVC -04
• Vigilant hosted /managed LEARN account
o Central repository for all LPR data acquired by each LPR system
• Includes Vigilant's suite of LPR data analytics via online web access
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
$1,500.00
o Automated CarDetector software update management
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
1 $0.00
o Plate searching, mapping, data mining utilities
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
$3,000.00
o Stakeout, Associate Analysis and Locate Analysis
o Full administrative security with management auditing
• Plug -N -Play an unlimited number of CarDetector LPR systems
o Requires NO server hardware, NO server maintenance
• Requires Vigilant Enterprise Service Agreement contract
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
$0.00
Qty
Model #
Description
(3)
VSBSCSVC -04
Vigilant LPR Basic Service Package for Hosted /Managed LPR Deployments
• Managed /hosted server account services by Vigilant
o Includes access to all LEARN and CarDetector software updates
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
$1,500.00
• Priced per camera per year for over 60 total camera units
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
1 $0.00
• Requires new /existing Enterprise Service Agreement (ESA)
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
$3,000.00
Qty
Model #
Description
(1)
TAS -UL
Target Alert Service - LPR Alert Delivery Software - Unlimited User
• Real Time LPR notification and mapping software sends LPR alerts to any in- network PC
• Send Alerts over any communication protocol including LAN, WAN, internet wireless, etc.
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
$1,500.00
• Server Client software compatible with all Vigilant CDFS applications
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
1 $0.00
Qty
Model #
Description
(4)
SSU- SYS -COM
Vigilant System Start Up & Commissioning of'In Field' LPR system
• Vigilant technician to visit customer site
• Includes system start up, configuration and commissioning of LPR system
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
$1,500.00
• Applies to mobile (1 System) and fixed (1 Camera) LPR systems
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
1 $3,400.00
Qty
Model #
Description
(1)
VS- TRVL -01
Vigilant Travel via Client Site Visit
• Vigilant certified technician to visit client site
• Includes all travel costs for onsite support services
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
$1,500.00
Qty
Model #
Description
(4)
CDFS -2HWW
Fixed Camera LPR System - Extended Hardware Warranty - Year 2 & 3
• Fixed LPR System LPR hardware component replacement warranty
• Applies to 1- Channel hardware system kit
• Valid for 2 years from standard warranty expiration
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
1 $4,000.00
Qty
Model #
Description
(4)
VS- SHP -02
Vigilant Shipping & Handling Charges
• Applies to each fixed camera LPR System
• Shipping Method is FOB Destination
117
118
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax) 1 $220.00
Qty
Model #
Description
(1)
VS- SUBLET -INS
I Installation of 4 Reaper fixed cameras and 1 communication box
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
1 $3,883.50
Qty
Model #
Description
(1)
Tax
Tax at 8.25% on equipment
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax)
1 $2,588.52
Quote Notes:
1. All prices are quoted in USD and will remain firm and in effect for 60 days.
2. No permits, start -up, installation, and or service included in this proposal unless explicitly stated above.
3. Central compute resource hardware sold separately unless explicitly stated above.
4. All hardware components to have standard One (1) year hardware warranty.
5. All software to have standard one (1) year warranty for manufacturer defects.
6. Compatibility with Vigilant Solutions hardware /software to be confirmed prior to sale.
7. Software is manufactured under strict Vigilant Solutions standard.
8. Compliance to local codes neither guaranteed nor implied.
9. All orders subject to credit acceptance by Vigilant Solutions management.
1 O.This Quote is provided per our conversation & details given by you - not in accordance to any written specification.
1 1.This Quote does not include anything outside the above stated bill of materials.
12.Quote assumes 110 constant power is easily accessible.
13.Quote assumes network is easily accessible or air cards will be furnished by customer.
14.Work performed between 8 -5 M -F.
Quoted by: Kris Robinson - 949 - 525 -3326 - kris .robinson @vigilantsolutions.com
Total Price (Excluding sales tax)
$49,968.02
Accepted By:
Date:
P.O#
'MILD]
The below information is provided in support of my Department requesting approval for
a single/sole source. Outside of a duly declared emergency, the time to develop a
statement of work or specifications is not in itself justification for single or sole source.
Vendor: Vigilant Solutions Inc.
Commodity/Service: Fixed Camera ALPR Installation
Estimated expenditure: $100,000-00
Date: Nov 17, 2015
Your Name: Steve Wolff 1011
Extent of market search conducted: This vendor is one of the top two vendors in the field of
Law Enforcement ALPR Systems.
Price Reasonableness: The price is competitive with similar products on the market
Does moving forward on this product/service further obligate the City to future similar
contract actual arrangements? There will be annual service fees for the hosted storage
solution.
DEFINITIONS:
SINGLE SOURCE — a transaction with a business entity that is chosen, without competition, from
among two or more business entities capable of supplying or providing the goods or services that
meet the specified need.
SOLE SOURCE - A transaction with the only business entity capable of supplying or providing the
goods or services that meet the specified need.
Initial all entries below that apply to the proposed purchase (more than one entry will apply to most
single/sole source prod ucts/services requested). If needed, attach a memorandum containing
complete justification and support documentation as directed in initial entry.
THIS IS A SINGLE SOURCE F—] THIS IS A SOLE SOURCE PURCHASE R,/ (check one).
1. SINGLE/SOLE SOURCE REQUEST IS FOR THE ORIGINAL MANUFACTURER,
THERE ARE NO REGIONAL DISTRIBUTORS. (item no. 3 also must also be completed).
2. THE PARTS/EQUIPMENT ARE NOT INTERCHANGEABLE WITH SIMILAR PARTS
OF ANOTHER MANUFACTURER. (Explain in separate memorandum).
D:\TernpFiles\Temporary Internet Files\OLK2] C\Sole Source Justification Form (3).doc
P120
Single/Sole Source Justification Form
Page 2
3. THIS IS THE ONLY KNOWN ITEM OR SERVICE THAT WILL MEET THE
SPECIALIZED NEEDS OF THIS DEPARTMENT OR PERFORM THE INTENDED
FUNCTION. (Attach memorandum with details of specialized function or application).
4. UNIQUE FEATURES OF THE SUPPLY/SERVICE BEING REQUESTED. THERE IS
NO ALTERNATIVE SUPPLIER. (Attach memorandum with reasons why these unique
features are and what benefit the City will accrue.)
5. THE PARTS/EQUIPMENT ARE REQUIRED FROM THIS SOURCE TO PERMIT
STANDARDIZATION (Attach memorandum describing basis for standardization request).
6. NONE OF THE ABOVE APPLY. A DETAILED EXPLANATION AND JUSTIFICATION
FOR THIS SINGLE/SOLE SOURCE REQUEST IS CONTAINED IN ATTACHED
MEMORANDUM.
The undersigned requests that competitive procurement be waived and that the vendor identified as
the supplier of the service or material described in this single/sole source justification be authorized
as a single/sole source r the service or material.
Department Head: Department:
* ♦ + ♦ + ♦ * ♦ ♦ + Purchasing Department
F-1 APPROVED
F-1 APPROVED WITH CONDITION/S
F-1 DISAPPROVE
Comments:
$5,000 - $50,000
APPROVED BY PURCHASING MANAGER:
$50,000 — 100,000
APPROVED BY CITY MANAGER:
$100,000 AND OVER
See comments above by Purchasing Division, attach to Council Request
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Date:
Date:
Date:
D:\TempFiles\Temporary Internet Files\OLK2 I C\Sole Source Justification Form (3).doc 1/18/07
P121
STAFF REPORT
R- -1NCHO CUCANIONGA POLICE DEP MIENT
DATE: November 11, 2015
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
John Gillison, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Danielle Boldt, Police Chief cV
BY: Frank Montanez, Lieutenant
Steve Wolff, Detective
RANCHO
;UCAMONGA
SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION FOR THE EXPANSION OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY VIDEO
NETWORK FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NUMBER 1017701 IN THE AMOUNT OF
$72,100.00.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that City Council approve the authorization to utilize $72,100.00 from account
1017701 for the expansion of the Public Safety Video Network to include the integration of the
Archibald Library Surveillance platform and City Hall's Surveillance platform into PSVN.
BACKGROUND
In 2013, the City Council approved the purchase of the Public Safety Video Network (PSVN).
Phase 1 of this ongoing project was deployed around Victoria Gardens and portions of the Foothill
corridor. The existing 12 camera system operates 24 hours a day, 7 days a week with video
streams from all cameras continually recorded to the existing Network Attached Storage (NAS)
device. While the current NAS is sufficient for the existing cameras, planned growth for the PSVN
project requires that our storage platform be upgraded to accommodate this growth.
Phase 2 of the PSVN project involves the integration of existing city surveillance platforms found in
locations such as City Hall and the Archibald Library. This integration allows us to unify existing city
cameras and bring them under the management of the PSVN. At the same time however, the
introduction of recorded video from these sources obligates us to maintain the recorded video for a
period of 365 days in order to remain in compliance with Government Code Section 34090.6(c).
This section deals with retention of public records specifically video as it applies to routine
monitoring of public buildings. This obligation applies only to those locations where the video is
intended to enhance building security.
The expansion of the PSVN is intended to unify the video resources within the city and share those
assets across the network with those users who can benefit most. At the same time, this
integration replaces damaged or aging components as they fail thereby affecting a gradual and
more cost effective replacement of old equipment.
5*�
AUTHORIZATION FOR THE EXPANSION OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY VIDEO NETWORK PAGL. 2
FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NUMBER 1017701 IN THE AMOUNT OF $72,100.00.
NOVI3NIBGR 11, 2015
SOLE SOURCE VENDOR — LEVERAGE INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Leverage Information Systems is the existing sole source vendor for the PSVN. The proposed
expansion solutions are developed by their engineers to integrate with our existing system. We
currently contract for the support the PSVN through Leverage. In order to maintain the exceptional
level of service we have experienced with Leverage it is in our own best interest to keep all of the
key network components with the same vendor.
SYSTEM COST AND RECURRING COSTS
INTEGRATION OF CITY HALL SURVEILLANCE PLATFORM - $16,609.31
The integration process takes the existing surveillance system located at City Hall and creates a
new link to the available video feeds. These feeds continue to be recorded to the legacy system in
place but are also now connected to the PSVN where they are also recorded and operators have
full camera control. Ten additional cameras were added to facilitate coverage of the building where
previous blind spots existed. These new cameras will be connected to the PSVN system only. One
additional monitoring station will be added which will provide staff from Facilities Management to
monitor video from the cameras found within city buildings.
This proposal includes all components necessary to connect the legacy system and provide the
video from that source to the PSVN. It also includes 12 months of On -Site Service and sales tax.
INTEGRATION OF ARCHIBALD LIBRARY SURVEILLANCE PLATFORM - $11,704.23
This integration process is very similar to the integration at City Hall. A connection will be made to
the legacy system in place capturing the video feeds from the available cameras and routing a path
to the PSVN. Video will be recorded in both locations just as it is at City Hall. Four additional
cameras were added to enhance the video coverage of the building. These cameras will be
available to the PSVN but will not connect to the legacy system.
This proposal includes all components necessary to connect the legacy system and provide the
video from that source to the PSVN. It also includes 12 months of On -Site Service and sales tax.
REPLACEMENT OF NAS DEVICE WITH SAN DEVICE - $43,770.61
The proposed Storage Area Network (SAN) solution replaces the existing NAS solution providing a
far more robust and scalable method for recording large volumes of video data. It consists of a
network video recorder with 24 drives each of which has a capacity of 6 Terabytes. It is configured
as a RAID 5 storage solution with two hot spares and occupies a 4U rack space.
The price includes 12 months of On -Site Service and sales tax.
Attachments:
Quotation 1504578 from Leverage Information Systems
Quotation 1504575 from Leverage Information Systems
Quotation 1505229 from Leverage Information Systems
P123
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
SINGLE /SOLE SOURCE JUSTIFICATION
FOR PURCHASES $5,000 AND ABOVE
C V II ()k\l \
The below information is provided in support of my Department requesting approval for
a single /sole source. Outside of a duly declared emergency, the time to develop a
statement of work or specifications is not in itself justification for single or sole source.
Vendor: Leverage Information Systems Inc.
Commodity /Service: Phase 2 Expansion and Upgrade for PSVN
Estimated expenditure: $72,100.00
Date: Nov 10, 2015
Your Name: Steve Wolff
Extent of market search conducted: This vendor is one of the top three in the field of cell
phone forensics. Each vendor offers similar services.
Price Reasonableness: The price is competitive with similar products on the market
Does moving forward on this product/service further obligate the City to future similar
contract actual arrangements? There will be an annual service agreement for On -Site Support.
DEFINITIONS:
SINGLE SOURCE — a transaction with a business entity that is chosen, without competition, from
among two or more business entities capable of supplying or providing the goods or services that
meet the specified need.
SOLE SOURCE - A transaction with the only business entity capable of supplying or providing the
goods or services that meet the specified need.
Initial all entries below that apply to the proposed purchase (more than one entry will apply to most
single /sole source products /services requested). If needed, attach a memorandum containing
complete justification and support documentation as directed in initial entry.
THIS IS A SINGLE SOURCE r,7 THIS IS A SOLE SOURCE PURCHASE (check one).
1. SINGLE /SOLE SOURCE REQUEST IS FOR THE ORIGINAL MANUFACTURER,
THERE ARE NO REGIONAL DISTRIBUTORS. (Item no. 3 also must also be completed).
2. THE PARTS /EQUIPMENT ARE NOT INTERCHANGEABLE WITH SIMILAR PARTS
OF ANOTHER MANUFACTURER. (Explain in separate memorandum).
D: TempFiles Temporary Internet Files`OLK21C Sole Source Justification Form (3).doc
'Jif8zl
Single /Sole Source Justification Form
Page 2
3.. THIS IS THE ONLY KNOWN ITEM OR SERVICE THAT WILL MEET THE
SPECIALIZED NEEDS OF THIS DEPARTMENT OR PERFORM THE INTENDED
FUNCTION. (Attach memorandum with details of specialized function or application).
4. UNIQUE FEATURES OF THE SUPPLY /SERVICE BEING REQUESTED. THERE IS
NO ALTERNATIVE SUPPLIER. (Attach memorandum with reasons why these unique
features are and what benefit the City will accrue.)
5. THE PARTS /EQUIPMENT ARE REQUIRED FROM THIS SOURCE TO PERMIT
STANDARDIZATION (Attach memorandum describing basis for standardization request).
6. NONE OF THE ABOVE APPLY. A DETAILED EXPLANATION AND JUSTIFICATION
FOR THIS SINGLE /SOLE SOURCE REQUEST IS CONTAINED IN ATTACHED
MEMORANDUM.
The undersigned requests that competitive procurement be waived and that the vendor identified as
the supplier of the service or material described in this single /sole source justification be authorized
as a single /sole source for the service or material.
Department Head: Department:
• • • • • • • • • • Purchasing Department
APPROVED
APPROVED WITH CONDITION /S
DISAPPROVE
Comments:
$5,000 - $50,000
APPROVED BY PURCHASING MANAGER:
$50,000 — 100,000
APPROVED BY CITY MANAGER:
. . . . . . . . . .
$100,000 AND OVER
See comments above by Purchasing Division, attach to Council Request
Date:
Date:
CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Date:
D: TempFiles•.Temporary Internet Files'.OLK21C`.Sole Source Justification Form (3).doc 1 1807
P125
custom quote - clin.rpt
Printed: 09/21;12015, 10:10 AM
Page 1
Leverage Information
Quote
Systems
LEVERAGE
Phone: 425 - 482 -9200
NO.:
1504578
O R M A T I O N SYSTEMS
Fax: 425 - 485 -9400
Date:
09/18/2015
www ieverageiS eom
PO Box 630
Woodinville, WA 98072
Prepared
for:
Prepared by: Colin McElroy
Steve Wolff (909) 477 -2857
Account No.: 2150
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Type: Open Market
Job: City Hall
CLIN
Qty.
Item ID
Description
UoM
Ea. Price
Total
- Hardware
-
001
1
0542 -004
P7216 VIDEO ENCODER 16PORT SFP
EA
$1,278.42
$1,278.42
002
1
210 -AAIV
Dell Precision T1700 MT CTO Base, 8GB
EA
$2,293.67
$2,293.67
(2x4GB) 160OMHz DDR3 Non -ECC
003
8
SNV -6013
Compact Network Dome Camera 1080p
EA
$256.50
$2,052.00
2MP Wide view angle
004
2
SNF -8010
Network Fisheye Dome, 5MP, dewarping,
EA
$610.07
$1,220.14
true d/n
005
2
VA2446M -LED
Viewsonic VA2446m -LED 24" LED LCD
EA
$210.90
$421.80
Monitor - 16:9 - 5 ms
- Installation Materials -
006
1.00
LOT - EQUIP
Installtion Materials
EA
$450.32
$450.32
- Labor -
011
1.00
OSINSTALL
Onsite Installation
EA
$6,612.00
$6,612.00
- Leverage Onsite & Warranty Support -
016
1
LM- 0542- 004- OS -lYR
12 Months On -Site NBD Support (8 -5/ M -F)
EA
$217.36
$217.36
017
1
LM- 0542 - 004 -W -lYR
12 Month Extended Warranty, Depot Repair
EA
$79.95
$79.95
or Replacement
018
1
LM- 210- AAIV- OS -lYR
12 Months On -Site NBD Support (8 -5/ M -F)
EA
$203.77
$203.77
019
1
LM- 210- AAIV -W -lYR
12 Month Extended Warranty, Depot Repair
EA
$74.95
$74.95
or Replacement
020
8
LM -SNV- 6013- OS -lYR
12 Months On -Site NBD Support (8 -5/ M -F)
EA
$54.24
$433.91
021
2
LM -SNF- 8010- OS -IYR
12 Months On -Site NBD Support (8 -5/ M -F)
EA
$129.00
$258.01
022
2
LM -SNF- 8010 -W -lYR
12 Month Extended Warranty, Depot Repair
EA
$47.45
$94.90
or Replacement
023
2
LM- VA2446M- LED -OS
12 Months On -Site NBD Support (8 -5/ M -F)
EA
$31.40
$62.80
-1YR
- Freight -
014
1.00
Freight - Fixed Price
Fixed Freight Charge
EA
$220.36
$220.36
custom quote - clin.rpt
Printed: 09/21;12015, 10:10 AM
Page 1
Prices are firm until 10/18/2015 Terms: Net 30
Quoted by:
Signature:
Print Name:
Colin McElroy, colin.mcelroy @leverageis.com
PO #:
Title:
Disclaimer
Unless otherwise quoted, Standard delivery charges are 30 days ARC. Expedited freight will be charged prepay
and add. Please notify your sales rep should you want to use a freight account.
If applicable, sales tax will be charged when invoiced.
Leverage Information Systems 30 day return policy does not apply to changed, opened, or cancelled orders. In
the event the customer chooses to change or cancel an order, restocking fees may apply.
Leverage is a Small Business Enterprise
Pricing is valid for (30) days
Accepted Methods of Payment - Check or EFT, Please contact your sales rep for re -quote should you like to
pay via Credit Card
Tax ID / EIN# 91- 1607710
DUNS# 807596051
Cage Code: OX61-17
P126
Quote
No.: 1504578
Date: 09/18/2015
Your Price:
$15,974.37
Sales Tax
$634.94
SubTotal:
$16,609.31
Total: $16,609.31
Date: 9/18/2015
Date:
PH# :
custom quote - clin.rpt Printed: 09/21/2015, 10:10 AM Page 2
P127
City of Rancho Cucamonga
City Hall Surveillance
September 21, 2015
Design Proposal
Design Overview
LE'/EI�1GE
��n. MAI IBM %V2tIVI
Leverage will integrate an existing 11 camera surveillance system within City Hall, to the
Rancho Cucamonga City Wide Surveillance system consisting of Leverage VMS.
Additional new IP cameras will also be added to provide more coverage.
An existing Pelco DVR unit, located within Lower Lever Office Rack, will be replaced by
a new Axis 16- Channel Encoder to allow the conversion necessary from the existing
analog cameras to an IP accessible device. Each of the 11 existing analog cameras will
be relocated from the DVR to the new encoder unit. A new customer supplied CAT5/6
connection from the encoder to the surveillance switch will be required. Live video will
be configured at 4CIF /30fps resolution and will be viewed on the existing PD viewing
station.
Ten new IP cameras will be installed to supplement the existing surveillance system,
adding coverage to key areas. Each camera will be CAT5/6 PoE cabled to an existing
surveillance network switch by the customer; the customer is to provide all network
services, hardware, PoE Power, and configuration to support the additional cameras.
Camera locations are as follows:
1. Lower Level IT Hallway1 — Samsung SNV -6013
2. Lower Level IT Hallway2 — Samsung SNV -6013
3. Lower Level Loading Dock Door — Samsung SNV -6013
4. City Hall Entrance 360 — Samsung SNF -8010
5. City Hall Second Floor 360 —Samsung SNF -8010
6. City Hall Plaza Level Stairwell — Samsung SNV -6013
Page 1
This document is to be treated as proprietary and confidential to Leverage Information Systems, Inc and is to be shared only with
those individuals involved with the negotiation or proper execution of the AGREEMENT described herein.
P128
LEVERAGE
naanainon ses1101
7. Council Chambers Hallway — Samsung SNV -6013
8. Council Chambers Entrance Door — Samsung SNV -6013
9. Plaza Level North Stairwell — Samsung SNV -6013
10. Plaza Level North Hallway — Samsung SNV -6013
360 degree cameras will be installed the City Hall Entrance & 2nd Floor to provide
maximum coverage of the area.
An existing NVR SAN unit, installed on the Metrolink project, will record the 19 (11
existing & 8 new) cameras for 31 days at 4CIF / 30 frames per second.
An additional viewing station will be installed at the City Yard within Neil Plummer's
office. Leverage VMS will be installed and the viewing station will be configured to view
City Hall and Archibald Library cameras. A multicast capable network connection from
the City Yard to the City Hall /PD building will be required view video, and will be the
responsibility of the customer.
Statement of Work
Leverage will provide and install the following:
a. Axis P7216 16- Channel Encoder rack
i. Remove existing Pelco DVR and return to the customer
ii. Connect BNC coax cables (11) previously installed on the DVR to
the new Encoder.
iii. CAT5/6 cable from the Encoder to the existing customer switch
b. Samsung SCV -6013 IP Vandal -Proof Dome Cameras (x8)
i. Install cameras and connect to customer supplied cabling /PoE
power.
c. Samsung SNF -8010 360 Cameras (x2)
i. Install cameras and connect to customer supplied cabling /PoE
power.
d. Configure existing Leverage VMS database to include the cameras. Add
cameras to NVR for recording.
i. Create Building maps to show camera placement within VMS.
e. Install new Viewing Station at City Hall within Neil Plummer's office — two
24" Monitors will also be provided as part of the viewing station
i. Install Leverage VMS and configure to view video from City
cameras and Archibald Library cameras.
Customer to provide and install:
a. All Network Switching & configuration required. Leverage Engineering will
work with the customer to create a viable network topology.
b. CAT5/6 cabling with PoE power to each camera location. PoE to be
IEEE802.3af class3 or higher.
c. CAT5 /6 cabling from encoder unit to surveillance network switch
Page 2
This document is to be treated as proprietary and confidential to Leverage Information Systems, Inc and is to be shared only with
those individuals involved with the negotiation or proper execution of the AGREEMENT described herein.
�r
a
LLJ
L
a
bD
Gc.
CL
O
a
O
C')
O
N Sp
N "
a rn
CD
c
c
CD
L
L_
�3
(D
0
C
N
7
a
C
0
L
O
CD
� •c
N
Gl N
aL
o �
Na
U
(0 N �
U �
cZ
N w
0) w
U
r
N
l0 L.
O O
c O
m m
> N
N
J
r
c
a�
a
w
c
U
C
(0
N
N
a
2
CL
N
(0
N
f0
N
a�
a
P129
m�
7711 r"71 ' .v JC
� !J r'1 f IFeU�I �• �13 e''
�a.
ii6 .�..� -
n,
sill o r !
J� J�� Y .•
c c
Eppp
a to
!4 r 3= 3s
1 � � :1
5 3
eai,
� - - _Lq � -- •� _ t
E g v
F n
3 O
e �v'
1
t•��
L
a
bD
Gc.
CL
O
a
O
C')
O
N Sp
N "
a rn
CD
c
c
CD
L
L_
�3
(D
0
C
N
7
a
C
0
L
O
CD
� •c
N
Gl N
aL
o �
Na
U
(0 N �
U �
cZ
N w
0) w
U
r
N
l0 L.
O O
c O
m m
> N
N
J
r
c
a�
a
w
c
U
C
(0
N
N
a
2
CL
N
(0
N
f0
N
a�
a
P129
W:
C �
Go
a
�o
M'u
w
CL rn
N
C
L
L
.3
O>
CU
c
y
v
0
L
.r-
>1
C
O
N
N
G7 N
m
o
U
-O U
C y
co -O
U �
�Z
N W
a) W
U)
O Q
w
E o
O
c O
O U
X
a�
J
O
(D
C
O
U
C
N
a
0
CL
P130
I• f'
I( 11
pP L .J I I!
c o
i
•.
LLL
c
w M� -µ-,.
d r
O
o
m b
U
_
J
'
O W
i m
�
a�
t
�
44)
pp
®
s
A
- r'
Eis
a
3G
? C � M E T
-
A U
-
�o
M'u
w
CL rn
N
C
L
L
.3
O>
CU
c
y
v
0
L
.r-
>1
C
O
N
N
G7 N
m
o
U
-O U
C y
co -O
U �
�Z
N W
a) W
U)
O Q
w
E o
O
c O
O U
X
a�
J
O
(D
C
O
U
C
N
a
0
CL
P130
�§
�)
�
�
�
)
§
k
�
7
■
>
Q
5
k
�
"o
�
�
c
e.2
\/
r
±
\
\
.(
\
\
\
_
go
»
�
7E 0
\_
§a
2j
{)
\}
\§
k§
/\
\/
E«
k§
)§
§»
)
\
�
/
\
@
CD
cc
\
Yi
P131
N
f
....k {
■
k
Z
�\
3�
S2
{S2
-
o.
• ! �
�
22
!k
A
� )�\
)!z
;
||!
�
�!`
|&E
_
!7J
kt/
ƒ
�
k{k
�
)
§
k
�
7
■
>
Q
5
k
�
"o
�
�
c
e.2
\/
r
±
\
\
.(
\
\
\
_
go
»
�
7E 0
\_
§a
2j
{)
\}
\§
k§
/\
\/
E«
k§
)§
§»
)
\
�
/
\
@
CD
cc
\
Yi
P131
3
0
a
6
L
7
b0
G1.
CL
O
CL
O
co o
&S2
m0 rn
CL
d
c
a>
L
L
.3
v
d
0
•c
L
3
T
C
O
CD
�p •C
N �
N N
D L
O y
N .D
-O U
C N
CU O
U �
cZ
to W
�
w
5 of
cQ
0
E o
O C
C O
N
N
x
N
J
r
C
N
C
O
U
G
m
l9
N
CL
0
a
N
f0
d
f0
N
a�
D
O
N
C
N
E
U
O
N
t
P132
a
fs
a�
v
y8
`O
O
°g O
v
O
i
c
t7
J
c
J
3
d
J
fV
@
a
3
co
F
�v
g =°
J
o
o
a�
3
r
u
J
g r
F,
Nf
�a$
NI
c
N
�cn
9£ £•7E
•.:::
8
o
m $ g
a�
gAg
c d 6
3
0
a
6
L
7
b0
G1.
CL
O
CL
O
co o
&S2
m0 rn
CL
d
c
a>
L
L
.3
v
d
0
•c
L
3
T
C
O
CD
�p •C
N �
N N
D L
O y
N .D
-O U
C N
CU O
U �
cZ
to W
�
w
5 of
cQ
0
E o
O C
C O
N
N
x
N
J
r
C
N
C
O
U
G
m
l9
N
CL
0
a
N
f0
d
f0
N
a�
D
O
N
C
N
E
U
O
N
t
P132
�£
�!
�\
�
�
�
�
�
0
�2
//
/
7
$
\
\
§
0
_
_
!
�
§
7
]�
(D j
{)
\)
\§
�§
f%
)7
/\
fE
\§
�§
R
]
�
/
[
m
LU
41
\
E
0
_
\
P]SS
: k
c
S
, §
w
\
�\
. :
2 §
) v
�
'\. -
�4
(•■
� !
m
» �k}
■ -.!\
� ■.
J�
oil
| - ■ =E
_ §!|
�� @ ¢ •�!
£ ) ■�`
ELI
|k
m
. g
_§ f7f
�
�
0
�2
//
/
7
$
\
\
§
0
_
_
!
�
§
7
]�
(D j
{)
\)
\§
�§
f%
)7
/\
fE
\§
�§
R
]
�
/
[
m
LU
41
\
E
0
_
\
P]SS
�§
�I
�
�
�
2
§
U
�
�
I"
\
;4
co .2
//
r
2
B
f
\
m
�
a
j
ƒ
»
»
§
\
f�
2)
§)
]k
\§
kw
/\
§<
g/
E%
\E
\§
§�
\
7
\
\
/
f
\
&
/
E
§
_
/
P134
£)
�
$
�
£
}
2
\
§
!�
/ )
.- . -.
/
�
.
u
I
- f
m
!
q
!\
_ a |!!
£\
,m §■!
�0 k ƒ}
| \f ) |\
,
»�
■e
N
E
s
kk§
}�
.
\�k
�
�
>
_
) {I
2
2
§
U
�
�
I"
\
;4
co .2
//
r
2
B
f
\
m
�
a
j
ƒ
»
»
§
\
f�
2)
§)
]k
\§
kw
/\
§<
g/
E%
\E
\§
§�
\
7
\
\
/
f
\
&
/
E
§
_
/
P134
P135
LtV�GE
IIP CCY111CC 15'71101
Payment Terms
This project will commence on a date agreed to by both parties, and may change during the project as
agreed upon by both parties and documented by Leverage Project Management.
1. Project will be invoiced 100% at project completion.
Project is Prevailing Wage
Page 9
This document is to be treated as proprietary and confidential to Leverage Information Systems, Inc and is to be shared only with
those individuals involved with the negotiation or proper execution of the AGREEMENT described herein.
P136
LtARAGE
IIP CRUM IOR IVSIIYI
Support Plans
Leverage Information Systems' video practice is committed to providing exceptional service and
support to our customers. As part of that commitment, we offer two service support plans: On
site and Remote. Each is tailored to provide the right amount of support for your video systems.
Our Silver plan featuring phone center support is described below.
Remote Phone Support plan. Leverage Information Engineering will remotely
diagnose reported system failures, and provide resolution. Remote support is
predicated upon establishing VPN connectivity and appropriate access to the
Customer's network. Corrective action may be resolved remotely, or require
replacement of Field Replaceable Units.
• Response Time to initial call: 4 hours (normal business hours)
• Parts Coverage: All parts are covered under this plan. The only exceptions are
standard consumable items such as batteries, access cards, etc.
• Leverage will provide system level training. Failed components will be diagnosed
by Leverage and replaced by the customer.
• Items Not Covered: Any damage caused by misuse, abuse, accident, disaster,
fire, flood, water, wind, lightning and Acts of God. Also, any items designed to
fail in order to protect equipment, such as power and /or lightening suppressors.
On -Site Support plan. Leverage Information Engineering will remotely diagnose
reported system failures, and provide resolution. Support is predicated upon
establishing VPN connectivity and appropriate access to the Customer's network. As
necessary, Leverage Information Engineering will deploy an Engineer on site for
resolution.
• Response Time to initial call: 4 hours (normal business hours)
• Engineer on site: Next Business Day if determined by remote diagnosis.
• Parts Coverage: All parts are covered under this plan. The only exceptions are
standard consumable items such as batteries, access cards, etc.
• Items Not Covered: Any damage caused by misuse, abuse, accident, disaster,
fire, flood, water, wind, lightning and Acts of God. Also, any items designed to
fail in order to protect equipment, such as power and /or lightening suppressors.
Project Acceptance
Print Name
Signature
Title
Date
Page 10
This document is to be treated as proprietary and confidential to Leverage Information Systems, Inc and is to be shared only with
those individuals involved with the negotiation or proper execution of the AGREEMENT described herein.
P137
L�V�GE
RP E4Yl1 IBM IVSt3al
Project Terms and Conditions
On Site Material Storage
On site storage of project materials may be necessary to meet project schedule and cost objectives. During the project charter
development, Leverage may request that the customer provide a secure area to support storage of materials. Leverage assumes
that the customer will make an agreed upon location available to store project related materials if deemed necessary.
Equipment Mounting Locations
Within the Leverage proposal there may be locations identified where proposed equipment will be installed. Upon acceptance of the
design proposal, Leverage assumes the following:
Use of Assets for equipment mounting
The proposal may include mounting of equipment in locations conducive to meet the project requirements. Leverage will
document those locations in the design proposal and once agreed upon with the customer assumes the location is
available for use immediately upon approval by the customer to proceed with the project, or at the time identified in the
project schedule. Failure to make the agreed upon locations available by the customer may result in increased cost
incurred by Leverage. If the failure to make agreed upon locations available it will be noted on the project schedule
developed during the project charter development phase. Leverage will make every attempt to avoid incurring costs
outside the scope of the project, but may find it necessary to pass those costs to the customer in the form of a change
order.
Provisioning of Power
Unless otherwise stated in the Statement of Work, power as specified in the Leverage proposal, is the responsibility of the customer.
Typically for outdoor installations Leverage will require power to be extended to the equipment mounting location (within a few feet),
and terminated into a standard J -box (typically 4" x 4 "). Leverage will use flexible conduct from the customer provided J -Box to the
Leverage equipment. The customer is responsible to provide continuous reliable power.
If the Statement of Work states that Leverage will provide power to the equipment, the customer agrees to provide a continuous
reliable power source at an agreed upon location as identified within the Statement of Work or Project Charter.
Tree Trimming and other obstructions
In many cases, Leverage deploys wireless networks to transport IP surveillance video. As such, Leverage will conduct a site survey
during the development of a proposal based upon a clear line of site from one location to another as documented in the proposal.
Obstructions to line of sight may occur from the time the site survey was conducted to the installation, or even possibly after the
initial installation. Lack of line of sight may impact the transmission of wireless signals.
Any obstructions to the line of sight that occur subsequent to the generation of the Leverage proposal are the responsibility of the
customer. Remediation may result in tree trimming, sign removal and relocation, or other.
Sufficient lighting for video quality
During the deployment of a proposal, lighting conditions are taken into consideration. Poor lighting conditions will impact video
quality, and cause recorded video to require additional storage, which may not be taken into account. Some cameras support
day /night and will automatically switch to night mode when lighting falls below a threshold. Artificial lighting including IR may
improve vision in low light conditions. Leverage may include in the IR lighting with coverage areas that the customer may want to
validate in order to ensure the desired coverage is achieved. During the project design this will be discussed and again reviewed
during the project charter. The primary responsibility for sufficient lighting will be the customer's.
Leverage will make every attempt to ensure sufficient video quality with poor lighting including the following items below.
Existing lighting may be required to meet video quality objectives.
IR lighting may be added. If so, IR lighting has a coverage area much like a camera. The coverage area is provided by
the IR lighting OEM, which is included in their specifications.
Traffic Management
Unless otherwise agreed to in the proposal the customer is responsible for Traffic Management, including any local permits or other
requirements related to access the location where equipment will be mounted.
Page 11
This document is to be treated as proprietary and confidential to Leverage Information Systems, Inc and is to be shared only with
those individuals involved with the negotiation or proper execution of the AGREEMENT described herein.
P138
LE(V. RAGE
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Corporate Headquarters
18815 139th Avenue NE, Suite B
Woodinville, WA 98072
800.825.6680 Toll free
425.482.9200 Office
425.485.9400 Fax
California
3100 East Cedar Street, Suite 13
Ontario, CA 91761
800.825.6680 Toll free
909.418.2805 Office
800.486.5009 Fax
www.leverageis.com
About Leverage
LEVER GE
IV9l YAlY64 itanus
Leverage Information Systems, Inc. (LEVERAGE) is an industry leading IP
communications networking solutions provider. Our Southwest Regional Office business
unit is focused on delivering IP -based and hard -wired surveillance solutions that
address Public Safety and Law Enforcement concerns. LEVERAGE maintains both
corporate and regional certification for all aspects of any tactical surveillance
architecture deployed by our professionals. We have become known for our
"LEVERAGE Standard" reliable Public Safety deployments within multiple Law
Enforcement Agencies in Southern California.
The LEVERAGE architecture lends itself to flexible add -on growth because of its open,
peer -to -peer (server -less) and license -free deployment model. Existing LEVERAGE
surveillance implementations are easily expanded by adding additional surveillance
nodes. Our open architecture and flexible integration can be seen in many cities in
Southern California.
Page 12
This document is to be treated as proprietary and confidential to Leverage Information Systems, Inc and is to be shared only with
those individuals involved with the negotiation or proper execution of the AGREEMENT described herein.
D
LE EGE
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
www leverageis.com
Prepared for:
Steve Wolff (909) 477 -2857
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Leverage Information
Systems
Phone: 425 -482 -9200
Fax: 425-485-9400
PO Box 630
Woodinville, WA 98072
Prepared by: Colin McElroy
Account No.: 2150
Type: Open Market
Job: Archibald Library
P139
Quote
No.: 1504575
Date: 09/17/2015
Your Price:
- Hardware -
$11,204.58
Sales Tax
$49965
SubTotal:
$11,704.23
001
1
0542 -004
P7216 VIDEO ENCODER 16PORT SFP
EA
$1,280.78
$1,280.78
002
1
210 -ACGZ
PowerEdge R220 1U Network Server, with
EA
$1,441.12
$1,441.12
2.7GHz CPU, 1600 MHz, 4GB RAM, Dual NIC,
2 3TB drive, no OS RAIDO
003
3
LEV- NVR -5 -LIC
Leverage NVR 2.x SW for QuickView. For
EA
$698.60
$2,095.80
use in SMB environment, HW Required for
use
004
4
SCV -5083
Analog Vandal Dome Camera, 1/3" 1.3MP
EA
$237.21
$948.84
CMOS, 1000TVL, Vari -focal Lens
(2.8- 10.5mm), True D /N, 120dB WDR,
Analytics, 24VAC/12VDC, IP66, IK10
- Installation Materials -
005
1.00
LOT - EQUIP
Installation Materials
EA
$346.92
$346.92
- Labor -
008
1.00
OSINSTALL
Onsite Installation
EA
$4,080.00
$4,080.00
- Onsite & Warranty Support -
012
1
LM- 0542 - 004- OS -lYR
12 Months On -Site NBD Support (8 -5/ M -F)
EA
$217.36
$217.36
013
1
LM- 0542 - 004 -W -lYR
12 Month Extended Warranty, Depot Repair
EA
$79.95
$79.95
or Replacement
014
1
LM- 210 - ACGZ- OS -1YR
12 Months On -Site NBD Support (8-5/ M -F)
EA
$278.54
$278.54
015
1
LM- 210 - ACGZ -W -lYR
12 Month Extended Warranty, Depot Repair
EA
$102.45
$102.45
or Replacement
016
4
LM -SCV- 5083- OS -1YR
12 Months On -Site NBD Support (8 -5/ M -F)
EA
$50.17
$200.70
- Freight -
017
1.00
Freight - Fixed Price
Fixed Freight Charge
EA
$132.12
$132.12
Your Price:
$11,204.58
Sales Tax
$49965
SubTotal:
$11,704.23
Total:
$11,704.23
custom quote - clin.rpt Printed: 09/21/2015, 10:11 AM Page 1
Prices are firm until 10/17/2015 Terms: Net 30
Quoted by: Colin McElroy, colin.mceiroy @leverageis.com
Signature:
Print Name:
PO #:
Title:
Disclaimer
Unless otherwise quoted, Standard delivery charges are 30 days ARO. Expedited freight will be charged prepay
and add. Please notify your sales rep should you want to use a freight account.
If applicable, sales tax will be charged when invoiced.
Leverage Information Systems 30 day return policy does not apply to changed, opened, or cancelled orders. In
the event the customer chooses to change or cancel an order, restocking fees may apply.
Leverage is a Small Business Enterprise
- Pricing is valid for (30) days
- Accepted Methods of Payment - Check or EFr, Please contact your sales rep for re -quote should you like to
pay via Credit Card
Tax ID / EIN# 91- 1607710
DUNS# 807596051
Cage Code: OX61-17
P140
Quote
No.: 1504575
Date: 09/17/2015
Date: 9/17/2015
Date:
PH# :
custom quote - clin.rpt Printed: 09/21/2015, 10:11 AM Page 2
2E§
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Archibald Library Surveillance
September 21, 2015
Design Proposal
Design Overview
LEV k RAGE
nRumea IV-$.1
Leverage will integrate an existing 15 camera surveillance system within the Archibald
Library, to the Rancho Cucamonga City Wide Surveillance system consisting of
Leverage VMS.
An existing fiber network connection existing from the Library to the City Hall; the
customer is responsible for providing all networking services. Live video from the 15
Library cameras will be viewable on the customers' existing Viewing Station at the
Police Dept. Video resolution is dependent on the customer supplied connection from
the Library to the City Hall / PD, with preferable resolution at 4CIF /30fps.
The existing Pelco DVR unit will be replaced by a new Axis 16- Channel Encoder to
allow the conversion necessary from the existing analog cameras to an IP accessible
device. A 1 U Server will also be installed to allow for local, high resolution video
recording. The server will run Leverage NVR software and will record the 15 Library
cameras for 31 days at 4CIF / 30 frames per second.
Four existing analog cameras will be replaced by WDR capable analog dome cameras.
WDR technology provides better image quality by balancing low light and bright light
imaging.
Page 1
This document is to be treated as proprietary and confidential to Leverage Information Systems, Inc and is to be shared only with
those individuals involved with the negotiation or proper execution of the AGREEMENT described herein.
2EK
LE. \IEIAGE
n•a 0401110" frenaf
Statement of Work
Leverage will provide and install the following:
a. Axis P7216 16- Channel Encoder rack
i. Remove existing Pelco DVR and return to the customer
ii. Connect BNC coax cables (15) previously installed on the DVR to
the new Encoder.
iii. CAT5/6 cable from the Encoder to the existing customer switch
b. 1 U Server — 4TB
i. Load with Leverage NVR and configure to record the (15) Library
cameras at 4CIF /30fps for 31 days retention.
ii. CAT5 /6 connect to customer switch
c. Samsung SCV -5083 Analog Vandal -Proof Dome Cameras (x4)
i. Reuse existing power and cabling
ii. Aim cameras to provide view of entrances (Front Lobby, Front
Entrance, & West Entrance) and rear of building (North Wall)
d. Configure existing Leverage VMS database to include the Library cameras
i. Create Building Maps to show camera placement within VMS
Customer is responsible to provide all networking (configuration and hardware) required
to send video traffic from the Library to the City Hall / PD, for integration into the
Leverage surveillance system.
Page 2
This document is to be treated as proprietary and confidential to Leverage Information Systems, Inc and is to be shared only with
those individuals involved with the negotiation or proper execution of the AGREEMENT described herein.
"�
�k
�}
.�
�
�
/
�
/
n o
//
�
2
k
\
j
/
j
§
_
\
/
7
]�
0
\f
c
/§
\§
/%
§<
\\
f§
\
§� §
]
]
�
f
/
\
/
k
0
74
P143
0
�3
E
k
» ,u _\
■ �
_ . Ly-
�
9§
}
§ $
r
/J $
`
§
/ @
§)
,]
!!
« i
!
�
a
®
|!
) � |}-
�� I-
�
\
. |■!
/
�
/
n o
//
�
2
k
\
j
/
j
§
_
\
/
7
]�
0
\f
c
/§
\§
/%
§<
\\
f§
\
§� §
]
]
�
f
/
\
/
k
0
74
P143
W
0
6�
V
wo
a
O
CL
O
�o
a rn
C
C
N
L
L_
3
(1)
0
L
ro
3
T
C
O
C
U
N N
aL
o
N
U
C �
m N
U �
cZ
�j w
Nw
LLJ
U) (�
C Q
cm
O N
IO w
O C
C O
N
m d
7 �
au
J
O
m
c
a�
a
c
O
U
C
m
m
d
a
0
a
co
m
Q
m
N
N
a
O
N
2EEI
m N
d O
N
� tY
CI
(} N
m
c �
w c
Z
U
V
U
Q
U
t �' QL77 gg
•V
d
N
�
a -
N
¢a
$ ng
y
m E
w o�am
w
v �' g
V
3 m
S N
6�
V
wo
a
O
CL
O
�o
a rn
C
C
N
L
L_
3
(1)
0
L
ro
3
T
C
O
C
U
N N
aL
o
N
U
C �
m N
U �
cZ
�j w
Nw
LLJ
U) (�
C Q
cm
O N
IO w
O C
C O
N
m d
7 �
au
J
O
m
c
a�
a
c
O
U
C
m
m
d
a
0
a
co
m
Q
m
N
N
a
O
N
2EEI
P145
LEVERAGE
ItY EtY3t IOY IY71tYI
Payment Terms
This project will commence on a date agreed to by both parties, and may change during the project as
agreed upon by both parties and documented by Leverage Project Management.
1. Project will be invoiced 100% at project completion.
Project is Prevailing Wage
Page 5
This document is to be treated as proprietary and confidential to Leverage information Systems, Inc and is to be shared only with
those individuals involved with the negotiation or proper execution of the AGREEMENT described herein.
P146
RAGE
rvrORWATIoa w21901
Support Plans
Leverage Information Systems' video practice is committed to providing exceptional service and
support to our customers. As part of that commitment, we offer two service support plans: On
site and Remote. Each is tailored to provide the right amount of support for your video systems.
Our Silver plan featuring phone center support is described below.
Remote Phone Support plan. Leverage Information Engineering will remotely
diagnose reported system failures, and provide resolution. Remote support is
predicated upon establishing VPN connectivity and appropriate access to the
Customer's network. Corrective action may be resolved remotely, or require
replacement of Field Replaceable Units.
• Response Time to initial call: 4 hours (normal business hours)
• Parts Coverage: All parts are covered under this plan. The only exceptions are
standard consumable items such as batteries, access cards, etc.
• Leverage will provide system level training. Failed components will be diagnosed
by Leverage and replaced by the customer.
• Items Not Covered: Any damage caused by misuse, abuse, accident, disaster,
fire, flood, water, wind, lightning and Acts of God. Also, any items designed to
fail in order to protect equipment, such as power and /or lightening suppressors.
On -Site Support plan. Leverage Information Engineering will remotely diagnose
reported system failures, and provide resolution. Support is predicated upon
establishing VPN connectivity and appropriate access to the Customer's network. As
necessary, Leverage Information Engineering will deploy an Engineer on site for
resolution.
• Response Time to initial call: 4 hours (normal business hours)
• Engineer on site: Next Business Day if determined by remote diagnosis.
• Parts Coverage: All parts are covered under this plan. The only exceptions are
standard consumable items such as batteries, access cards, etc.
• Items Not Covered: Any damage caused by misuse, abuse, accident, disaster,
fire, flood, water, wind, lightning and Acts of God. Also, any items designed to
fail in order to protect equipment, such as power and /or lightening suppressors.
Project Acceptance
Print Name Title
Signature Date
Page 6
This document is to be treated as proprietary and confidential to Leverage Information Systems, Inc and is to be shared only with
those individuals involved with the negotiation or proper execution of the AGREEMENT described herein.
2E"
LE E ,AQE
Project Terms and Conditions
On Site Material Storage
On site storage of project materials may be necessary to meet project schedule and cost objectives. During the project charter
development, Leverage may request that the customer provide a secure area to support storage of materials. Leverage assumes
that the customer will make an agreed upon location available to store project related materials if deemed necessary.
Equipment Mounting Locations
Within the Leverage proposal there may be locations identified where proposed equipment will be installed. Upon acceptance of the
design proposal, Leverage assumes the following:
Use of Assets for equipment mounting
The proposal may include mounting of equipment in locations conducive to meet the project requirements. Leverage will
document those locations in the design proposal and once agreed upon with the customer assumes the location is
available for use immediately upon approval by the customer to proceed with the project, or at the time identified in the
project schedule. Failure to make the agreed upon locations available by the customer may result in increased cost
incurred by Leverage. If the failure to make agreed upon locations available it will be noted on the project schedule
developed during the project charter development phase. Leverage will make every attempt to avoid incurring costs
outside the scope of the project, but may find it necessary to pass those costs to the customer in the form of a change
order.
Provisioning of Power
Unless otherwise stated in the Statement of Work, power as specified in the Leverage proposal, is the responsibility of the customer.
Typically for outdoor installations Leverage will require power to be extended to the equipment mounting location (within a few feet),
and terminated into a standard J -box (typically 4" x 4 "). Leverage will use flexible conduct from the customer provided J -Box to the
Leverage equipment. The customer is responsible to provide continuous reliable power.
If the Statement of Work states that Leverage will provide power to the equipment, the customer agrees to provide a continuous
reliable power source at an agreed upon location as identified within the Statement of Work or Project Charter.
Tree Trimming and other obstructions
In many cases, Leverage deploys wireless networks to transport IP surveillance video. As such, Leverage will conduct a site surrey
during the development of a proposal based upon a clear line of site from one location to another as documented in the proposal.
Obstructions to line of sight may occur from the time the site survey was conducted to the installation, or even possibly after the
initial installation. Lack of line of sight may impact the transmission of wireless signals.
Any obstructions to the line of sight that occur subsequent to the generation of the Leverage proposal are the responsibility of the
customer. Remediation may result in tree trimming, sign removal and relocation, or other.
Sufficient lighting for video quality
During the deployment of a proposal, lighting conditions are taken into consideration. Poor lighting conditions will impact video
quality, and cause recorded video to require additional storage, which may not be taken into account. Some cameras support
day /night and will automatically switch to night mode when lighting falls below a threshold. Artificial lighting including IR may
improve vision in low light conditions. Leverage may include in the IR lighting with coverage areas that the customer may want to
validate in order to ensure the desired coverage is achieved. During the project design this will be discussed and again reviewed
during the project charter. The primary responsibility for sufficient lighting will be the customer's.
Leverage will make every attempt to ensure sufficient video quality with poor lighting including the following items below.
1. Existing lighting may be required to meet video quality objectives.
2. IR lighting may be added. If so, IR lighting has a coverage area much like a camera. The coverage area is provided by
the IR lighting OEM, which is included in their specifications.
Traffic Management
Unless otherwise agreed to in the proposal the customer is responsible for Traffic Management, including any local permits or other
requirements related to access the location where equipment will be mounted.
Page 7
This document is to be treated as proprietary and confidential to Leverage Information Systems, Inc and is to be shared only with
those individuals involved with the negotiation or proper execution of the AGREEMENT described herein.
M A
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Corporate Headquarters
18815 139th Avenue NE, Suite B
Woodinville, WA 98072
800.825.6680 Toll free
425.482.9200 Office
425.485.9400 Fax
California
3100 East Cedar Street, Suite 13
Ontario, CA 91761
800.825.6680 Toll free
909.418.2805 Office
800.486.5009 Fax
www.leverageis.com
About Leverage
LEVERAGE
I�PV4 ATIDA lvylabs
Leverage Information Systems, Inc. (LEVERAGE) is an industry leading IP
communications networking solutions provider. Our Southwest Regional Office business
unit is focused on delivering IP -based and hard -wired surveillance solutions that
address Public Safety and Law Enforcement concerns. LEVERAGE maintains both
corporate and regional certification for all aspects of any tactical surveillance
architecture deployed by our professionals. We have become known for our
"LEVERAGE Standard" reliable Public Safety deployments within multiple Law
Enforcement Agencies in Southern California.
The LEVERAGE architecture lends itself to flexible add -on growth because of its open,
peer -to -peer (server -less) and license -free deployment model. Existing LEVERAGE
surveillance implementations are easily expanded by adding additional surveillance
nodes. Our open architecture and flexible integration can be seen in many cities in
Southern California.
Page 8
This document is to be treated as proprietary and confidential to Leverage Information Systems, Inc and is to be shared only with
those individuals involved with the negotiation or proper execution of the AGREEMENT described herein.
LEVERAGE
ORMATION SYSTEMS
www leverageis.com
Prepared for:
Steve Wolff (909) 477 -2857
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Leverage Information
Systems
Phone: 425-482-9200
Fax: 425 - 485 -9400
PO Box 630
Woodinville, WA 98072
Prepared by: Colin McElroy
Account No.: 2150
Type: Open Market
Job: SAN Upgrade - 144TB
Quote
No.: 1505229
Date: 11/03/2015
Prices are firm until 12/3/2015 Terms: Net 30
Quoted by: Colin McElroy, colin.mcelroy @leverageis.com
Signature: PO #:
Print Name: Title:
Disclaimer
Unless otherwise quoted, Standard delivery charges are 30 days ARO. Expedited freight will be charged prepay
and add. Please notify your sales rep should you want to use a freight account.
custom quote - clin.rpt Pnnted: 11/03/2015, 1:44 PM
P149
Your Price:
- Hardware & Software -
$40,706.27
Sales Tax
$3,064.34
SubTotal:
001
1 XNVR300
xVault Network Video Recorder 300 Series,
EA
$30,730.77
$30,730.77
4U, 24 Drive (6TB), Raid 5
*NOTE - 3 year warranty included in cost of Seneca NVR.
002
1.00 LEV- SANNVR- ENT -LIC
Leverage NVR 2.x SW for use in SAN
EA
$5,495.00
$5,495.00
environment, HW Required for use
- Installation Materials -
003
1.00 LOT - EQUIP
Installation Materials
EA
$500.00
$500.00
-Labor-
005
1.00 OSINSTALL
Onsite Installation
EA
$1,292.48
$1,292.48
- Leverage Onsite Support -
008
1 LM- xNVR300- OS -1YR
12 Months On -Site NBD Support (8 -5/ M -F)
EA
$2,402.02
$2,402.02
- Freight -
009
1.00 Freight - Fixed Price
Fixed Freight Charge
EA
$286.00
$286.00
Prices are firm until 12/3/2015 Terms: Net 30
Quoted by: Colin McElroy, colin.mcelroy @leverageis.com
Signature: PO #:
Print Name: Title:
Disclaimer
Unless otherwise quoted, Standard delivery charges are 30 days ARO. Expedited freight will be charged prepay
and add. Please notify your sales rep should you want to use a freight account.
custom quote - clin.rpt Pnnted: 11/03/2015, 1:44 PM
P149
Your Price:
$40,706.27
Sales Tax
$3,064.34
SubTotal:
$43,770.61
Total:
$43,770.61
Date: 11/3/2015
Date:
PH#
Page 1
P150
Quote
No.: 1505229
Date: 11/03/2015
If applicable, sales tax will be charged when invoiced.
Leverage Information Systems 30 day return policy does not apply to changed, opened, or cancelled orders. In
the event the customer chooses to change or cancel an order, restocking fees may apply.
Leverage is a Small Business Enterprise
Pricing is valid for (30) days
Accepted Methods of Payment - Check or EFT, Please contact your sales rep for re -quote should you like to
pay via Credit Card
Tax ID / EIN# 91- 1607710
DUNS# 807596051
Cage Code: OX61-17
custom quote - clin.rpt Printed: 11/03/2015, 1:44 PM Page 2
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Date: December 16, 2015
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
John R. Gillison, City Manager
From: Linda Daniels, Assistant City Manager
By: Flavio Nunez, Management Analyst II
Subject: Consideration to approve an Amended and Restated Mobile Home Accord for a period
of ten years with the following mobile home parks located in Rancho Cucamonga: Alta
Laguna, Alta Vista, Casa Volante, Chaparral Heights, The Pines, Ramona Villa, and
Svcamore Villa
It is recommended that the City Council approve the Amended and Restated Mobile Home Accord
for a time period of ten years with the following mobile home parks; Alta Laguna, Alta Vista, Casa
Volante, Chaparral Heights, The Pines, Ramona Villa, and Sycamore Villa.
The Mobile Home Accord is an agreement between the City and the mobile home park owners and
addresses space rent increases. The Accord was put into place almost 28 years ago as a way to
provide stability to mobile home park rents while still respecting the rights of the park owners and
their right to a "fair return" on their investment. The last extension was executed in April 2008 and
is set to expire February 5, 2016.
The Mobile Home Accord allows a mobile home park owner to increase space rents a certain
percentage each year based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI) with a minimum of 3% and a
maximum of 9 %. That means if the CPI is below 3 %, the owner can still raise rates by 3% and
should the CPI rise above 9 %, the owners can only increase rents by a maximum of 9 %.
As required by the Mobile Home Accord, the City of Rancho Cucamonga each year calculates the
CPI based on an average of the previous 12 -month released indexes. The data is obtained from
the U.S. Department of Labor for the Consumer Price Index for Urban Consumers (CPI -U) as
published for the Los Angeles- Orange County- Riverside area. City staff verifies and approves all
proposed rent increases for each park.
The Accord also contains a voluntary vacancy control provision that limits how much rent can
increase after a mobile home is sold or termination of tenancy has occurred. The Accord limits the
rent increase to 15 %, once every three years, except if the property is transferred to an immediate
family member (legal spouse, parents, or children). The Accord also addresses other adjustments
such as for governmental tax changes, utilities, and capital projects.
The Accord only regulates space rent increases and does not have the authority to address other
concerns such as landlord- tenant issues, park rules and regulations, long -term leases, and most
maintenance issues. The California Mobile Home Residency Law regulates these issues and both
P152
Consideration of renewal of Mobile Home Accords for a period of ten years with the P\c,i,.2
following mobile home parks located in Rancho Cucamonga: Alta Laguna, Alta Vista,
Casa Volante, Chaparral Heights, The Pines, Ramona Villa, and Sycamore Villa
mobile home and park owners can utilize the Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board to assist
when conflicting issues arise.
As stated earlier, the current Mobile Home Accord is set to expire February 5, 2016. Staff has met
with the representative of the owners and also with the resident committees to discuss and review
this extension. With the exception of the Groves, all of the mobile home park owners and those
parks that have resident committees have agreed to a 10 -year extension. The Amended and
Restated Accord also includes other minor updates. Language was added to the Accord that
requires park owners obtain a signed acknowledgement from prospective residents confirming they
were offered the Accord if they choose a long term lease. This update to the Accord was requested
by the resident committees and agreed to by the owners. That Accord also updates the rent
increase notification period from 60 -days to 90 -days per Mobile Home Residency Law.
In the case of the Groves Mobile Home Park, the owners requested the Accord be modified to allow
rents to be adjusted in the event property taxes increase due to change in ownership. Currently,
the Accord allows for rents to be adjusted in the event of an increase in taxes, assessments, or
levies imposed upon the mobile home park by local, state or federal government agencies, except
when an increase is due to a change in ownership. At this time, however, staff is recommending
the Amended and Restated Mobile Home Accord be approved with the seven parks listed in the title
of the staff report. It is not uncommon to have a mobile home park enter the Accord after the initial
approval of the agreement as this happened more than once in the Accord's history.
Communication between the City and the Groves ownership remains positive, and it is hoped that
an extension for this park can be considered by the City Council in the near future.
Respectfully submitted,
N iZ I Z M o
Linda Daniels
Assistant City Manager
Attachment — Amended and Restated Mobile Home Accord
P153
AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND OWNERS OF CERTAIN MOBILE HOME
PARKS WITHIN RANCHO CUCAMONGA PROVIDING FOR AN
ANNUAL MAXIMUM RENT ADJUSTMENT
This Amended and Restated Agreement ("Agreement "). which shall be known as "The
Mobile Home Park Accord" or "Accord" is made and entered into by and between the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and
the owners of certain mobile home parks in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California
(hereinafter collectively and individually referred to as "Owner"), and is effective as of this
_16th day of December, 2015; and provides as follows:
WHEREAS., there exists within the City and the surrounding areas a serious shortage of
mobile home rental spaces, which has resulted in low vacancy rates and potential for rising space
rents; and
WHEREAS, because of the high cost of moving mobile homes, the potential for damage
resulting therefrom, the requirements relating to the installation of mobile homes, including
permits, landscaping and site preparation, the lack of alternative home sites for mobile home
residences and the substantial investment of mobile home owners in such homes, there exists a
shortage of mobile home park spaces; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to protect the residents of mobile homes from unreasonable
space rent increases, while at the same time recognizing the need for mobile home park- owners
to receive a just and reasonable income sufficient to cover the costs of repairs, maintenance,
insurance, employee services, additional amenities and other operations, as well as a just and
reasonable return on investment, and
WHEREAS, it is commonly known that, after initial installation, virtually all mobile
homes are never thereafter moved and when a resident decides to move, the mobile home is
commonly sold in place and if rents are below free-market levels, the possibility exists that a
portion of the mobile home space value might be transferred upon such sale unless rents are
allowed to rise upon such sale to levels which are closer to or at free-market levels; and
WHEREAS, decisions of a rent stabilization board or similar decision-making body may
not necessarily fulfill the intent of protecting mobile home residents from unreasonable space
rent increases, nor do such decisions always provide an owner with the opportunity for a just and
reasonable income sufficient to operate a mobile home park, and to gain a fair and reasonable
return on investment, and
WHEREAS, concerns among residents and owners of mobile home parks over rent
increases and other park-related situations can often best be resolved between the two parties to
negotiate in good faith and reach agreement; and
WHEREAS, it is the intent of this Mobile Home Accord to protect mobile home park,
residents from unreasonable space rent adjustments and mobile home park owners from
infringen-ient upon property rights; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted Resolution No. 332 which creates oresidence
coo-irnitteeiu each ofthe eight mobile horne parks, and which authorizes the Mayor to execute
this Agreement on behalf of the City; and
WHEREAS, by mutual agreement, o mobile home accord between the City and Owner
has been io existence finin January l, 19S5io the effective date 0fthis Agreement and said
accord has fulfilled its purpose by stabilizing rents during the period 1985 through 2015 and of
geomro}|I improving relations bcLvvoco residents and owners within the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree os follows:
I . Recitals. The above recitals arc incorporated in this Agreement
2^ Consideration. In consideration of Owner enter ngiuio this Agreement, and O\mucr
keeping and perfori-ning all ofthe terms, covenants and conditions to be kept and performed by
Owner, City agrees that during the term of this Agreement, provided Owner is not in breach of
this Agreement, the City Council of City shall not enact any ordinance, resolution, or other
regulation which imposes restrictions upon or otherwise controls ()vvuor`y increase ordecrease of
cuobi/e home space rents.
3. Definitions. For purposes of this Agreement, the following words and phrases shall have
the meanings hereinafter stated:
A. "Annual Rent Adjustment" shall mean the rent adjustment made to the Base Rent
not more frequently than once every 365 days.
B. "Base Rent" shall be that rent charged by a Mobile Home Park as of December
3l,2Ol5, and recalculated thereafter each year according to any increase only for changes iothe
Consumer Price Index and shall not include any additional increases other than CPI except as
provided in paragraph 8 hereof and oS otherwise specifically provided for herein,
C. "Capital Project" shoUcueouuyr jeuLnhichioc/udcm1hecvnutruc|i000f/Dnevv
improvements r000do1ed by unubliu entity for health or safety purposes, or (ii) the rcpl4ocozont
of old improvements in a mobile home park, including, but not limited to, construction,
ioatu]lu1iou or replacement of clubhouse or portions thereof, oonzoloo area facilities, avviuzodog
pool, sauna or hot tub, or other recreational amenities, atnrcis and driveways, security gates,
outdoor orcommon ureu retaining n/oU8, Sev,cr, electrical, v/otec or
television reception systems, sprinkler ayotuoza, nr any similar improvement. Capital projects are
improvements defined herein which have ulife expectancy of five (5) years or more, which are
treated as Capital Improvements for Federal and State income tax purposes, which may not be
deducted for such tax purposes ua expenses and which have uuzioiozoou value ofu1 least ten
thousand dollars ($lO,OOO) for each project. Capital Projects donoiiocludenocuzu}repuirsor
maintenance or insured repairs or replacements. Further, Capital Projects do not include
improvements required due to Owner's failure to provide reasonable and sound maintenance of a
facility orfacilities.
D. "Consumer Price Indcz" (CPI) shall mean the Consumer Price Index for Urban
Consumers /CY1-Bl as published for the Loo &noc1os-Anuhoiol-Riverside area by the iJ.8.
Department of Labor, Bureau oF Labor Statistics.
E "Mobile Home" shall mean astructure designed for human habitation and for
being moved on a street or highv,,ay under permit pursuant to Section 35790 of the California
Vehicle Code. Mobile h000e includes n manufactured home, umdefiued iu Section ]Q087o[the
Health and Safety Code, and a inobilehorne, as defined in Section 18008 of the California Health
and Safety Code, but does not include u recreational vehicle, aodcfinodin Section 7q9.Z4ofthe
California Civil Code and Section )8Ul0n[ the California Health and Safety Code oru
commercial coodu}ororcommercial coach uodnfiocd in Section 18001.8 of the California Health
and Safety Code.
F. "Mobile Home Park" shall mean any area ofland within the City where two or
rnore mobile home spaces are rented, or held out for rent, to accommodate mobile homes used
for houzuohabitation, which is subject to thetenna and provisions of this f\grCcozout, including u
mubUchomc park, as defined in Section 7984 of the California Civil Code, uuzonufacturnd
housing community as defimedio Section l82l0.7oF the Health and Safety Code, oras
''oobUeborue park" is otherwise defioed by state law.
G. "Mobile Home Space" shall znoou the site within omobile ]ionic park intended,
designed, or used for the location nroocoo-iolndatiouofumobile home and any accessory
aLnucb|rba or appurtenances m1(ochcd thereto or used in conjunction therewith, which is on6ioct to
the terms and provisions o[ this Agreement.
H. '^[)vvoer" shall Include the owner nr operator ofomobile home park oroo agent or
royrcoontu|ivc authorized to act on said owner's or operator's behalf in connection with the
maintenance or operation nf that park.
l. '"Rcni" shall mean the money paid io consideration of the use and occupancy ofa
mobile home up&uu, including services, amenities, and benefits in connection therewith.
J. ^^llcmidcot` shall mean any person entitled io occupy u mobile home dwelling unit
pursuant to o\vocruhiy thereof orrental or lease arrangement with the owner nfthe xnbiuci
dwelling unit, nras authorized pursuant tothe Mobile Home Residency Law.
K. "Resident Cocornidce" shall rucuuthai five-member committee for each mobile
home park established by resolution o[ the City Council.
L. "Voluntary Vacancy" 8ho]} mean any one of the following: a aulc or resale of
mobile home to u new ruaideut(s); &rcouovol of the mobile home from the space; or aieru)iosdiou
of tenancy pursuant to the Mobile Home Residency Law. /\ ouic, rcoo}e or transfer nfinterest
between members of the same immediate family (defined oa the homeowner's legal spouse, the
homeowner's legal parents or the homeowner's legal children) shall not constitute a voluntary
vacancy under this provision.
-3-
4. Terni. The tc000[this Agreement shall be deemed io have commenced on February t�
2016 and shall end o1||:59pm.00 February 5,2026.
-^ `
A. The provisions of this Agreement shall apply to all INcbJe Dome Parks and all
Mobile flucno Spaces ovvuod by Owner within the City, except as provided in subparagraph B.
B. This }\greeoocni shall not apply to Mobile I1onoc 8poccm covered by leases at the
effective date ofthis Agreement, which provided for more than zoon[h-io-onou1h tenancy, but
only for the dura|i0no[ any such lease, Upon the expiration or other termination oF any such
lease, all provisions of this /\g7oonnont shall immediately be applicable to the Mobile 1|onoc
Space, unless and until such space is again leased for more than a mouth-to-mouth tenancy.
C. None o[ the provisions of this Agreement shall preclude u Resident from entering
into uork1oo ]eoyc with and the (lvvoo, for more than uc000[h-1n-cn0n1h tenancy.
D. ()vvncr shall iufoon any prospective Resident of the applicability o[this
Agreement to the prospective Mobile Home Space and shall supply a copy of this Agreement to
Such prospective Resident prior io executing o written lease with Such prospective Resident. At
the time a Lease is executed with an Owner, the Resident shall sign an acknowledgement, which
will be retained by the {}nuzcc, which u1o1ea the Accord was offered but was declined by the
B. This Agreement shall not the effective for any purpose until d has been executed
by duly authorized representatives of the Owners of all Mobile Home Parks which are situated in
the City as of March 4` 1992 other than The Groves Mobile Horne Pock (formerly knnvvu as
Foothill Mobile Manor).
F. Nothing in this Agreement shall bc deemed toiuzp0ye any obligation upon any
owner with respect to u Mobile Home Park not subject to such Owner's mn1m[
h. Mobile Home Park Re2istration. Within sixty (00) days of written notice bythe City
Manager or his designee, Owner shall bo required 10 file with the City Manager or his designee u
Rent Registration Statement for each Mobile Horne Space affected by this Agreement. The City
Manager nr his designee shall devise such registration fbonauouetocall foriofoonu1ioo
reasonably necessary to carry out the purposes and policies of this /\gTce000ut, and nhuU coui)
such forins to Owner in sufficient time as to allow Owner to fi)o ita/dhcirElcgistrutiou Stutecucu|g.
The Rent Registration Statement shall be made part of this Agreement upon its filing.
7. Rent Adjustment.
A. A1 least ninety (90) days prior b) the effective date 0forental nJiuobncuL Owner
shall sop/o all affected Residents, either por000n)!y or by mail, with notice of the proposed
u/6uutoneot in accordance with state law. Within five (5) days prior to any notice to Residents of
a rent adjustment, Owner shall provide the City Manager or his designee with the following
P157
(1) The effective date of the noticed adjustment;
(2) Identification of the Mobile Home Spaces affected,
(3 ) The amount of the Rent prior to the effective date of the notice for each of
those Mobile Home Spaces;
(4) The amount of the increase (in dollars) for each of those Mobile Home
Spaces and the basis for the increase with supporting data and calculations;
(5) The identity of spaces under lease.
B. No adjustment to the Base Rent for a Mobile Horne Space shall be noticed or
permitted or enforced more frequently than once every 365 days, except as provided in
paragraph 8 hereof.
C. Maximum Allowable Adjustment to Rent.:
(1) Owner shall be permitted to increase rent as to a Mobile Home Space in
excess of that which was lawfully charged during the previous year based upon all or any of the
following bases:
(a) Once each calendar year, Owner may adjust the Base Rent in all
amount not to exceed that amount derived by multiplying said Base Rent by one hundred percent
(100%) of the change of the CPI, as defined herein and as established by the City Manager. Said
increase shall not be less than three percent (3%) of said Base Rent nor greater than nine percent
(9%) hereof.
(b) Owner illay be granted an increase in Rent spread across all
Mobile Home Spaces in the Mobile Home Park on a pro rata basis in the event of all increase in
the taxes (except any increase in property taxes due to a change in ownership), assessments, or
levies imposed upon the Mobile Home Park by local, state or federal government agencies.
Owner shall so decrease Rent in said manner in the event of a decrease in such costs to Owner.
Any such increase may be made and any such decrease shall be made at the time when Owner
incurs the same subject to notice requirements applicable thereto.
(c) Owner may be granted an increase in Rent in the event of an
increase in the amount charged to Owner for refuse collection. sewer, water, electric,
tn electric, gas and
other public utility services. Owner may be granted said increase only for that increased amount
charged which is greater than the charge effective as of the conclusion of the previous calendar
year multiplied by the percentage adjustment to the Base Rent last calculated and allowed
pursuant to subparagraph 7(C)(1)(a) hereof. Any such increase shall be spread across all Mobile
Home Spaces in the Mobile Home Park on a pro rata basis. Owner shall decrease Rent in an
amount equivalent to the total decrease in such costs. Such decrease shall be spread across all
Mobile Home Spaces in the Mobile Home Park on a pro rata basis. Any such increase may be
made and any such decrease shall be at the time when Owner incurs the same subject to notice
requirements applicable thereto. The amount adjusted for refuse collection for each space within
a Mobile Home Park shall not be greater than any adjustment for refuse collection made to
-5-
UWV
residential units within the City. Documentation substantiating any such additional increase ur
decrease must be submitted 10 the City u1 least fivc(5) days before notice of such is made toany
park resident.
(J) Owner may be granted oo iuorcu:c in }lcut spread across all
Mobile Home Spaces in the Mobile Home Park oou pro rata basis io the event u Capital Project,
as defined herein, is made within the Mobile Home Park. The aolouu1 u}]ovvcd as increased Rent
shall bo equal tofifiy percent (5O%)o[ the costs of the Capital Project, ino|udiug design, permits,
construction and financing costs. The increase io Rent may bc made u1 the time when the Capital
Project is oocoplcted as determined byfinal inspection oFall govucoc0001ul entities, if any, having
jurisdiction over the Capital Project, snbicc1 to uohou roguircoouu1u applicable thereto. Said
increase io Rent shall bc evenly spread over a period 0F time equivalent to either the Internal
Revenue Service uolodizu|ionperiod applicable to the Capital [znprovecnuo1 or u shorter period
agreed toby Owner and the Resident Committee io the subject Mobile Home Park.
10 the event the Resident Committee asserts that uoRent increase
based on the Capital Project should occur because the need for the same xmuortexl yvvoo
generated by Owner's failure |o provide reasonable and normal maintenance o[a facility or
facilities and Owner disputes said assertion, the dispute shall be submitted to binding arbitration
pursuant to the applicable procedures of the American Arbitration Association. The
dc<cnuiuo]i0n made pursuant to such arbitration shall be binding, final and enforceable in the
same manner uo nfiou) udLyozeotofuooudoflaw. The costs of such arbitration shall be shared
equally by the Owner and the Residents.
to the contrary stated herein, Owner and
the residents of a Mobile Home Park, by and through the Resident Committee, may enter into a
v/rit1cu umoodoouot(a) to this Agreement ynovidin�for 0v/ueriuubJlioguuevv auzooi1yio such
park in consideration of Owner being enabled io recover all oru portion of the costs thereof by
way of increases to Rent charged pro rata to all Mobile Home Spaces within such park.
Owner and the Residents o[u Mobile Home Park, by and through
the Resident Committee, shall io good faith negotiate the sharing of costs nf repairing or
replacing facilities incurred due to any acts of God.
(7) Annually, beginning oo the effective date ofthis Agreement, the City
Manager or his designee shall dttuzoninc the percentage in the Consumer Price lodcz
which shall be used to calculate rent adjustments u[lVr/ed for all applicable Mobile }}ocuc
Spaces. Said percentage CPI shall ke calculated by dividing the sum of all monthly C9{
percentage changes during the previous year by twelve, beginning with CPl rc]coaud in the
previous to the cur-rent year and ending with the CPI released in November of the immediately
previous year. The City Manager orhis designee, upon request, shall notify uo Owner ofsuch
allowable Consumer Price Index.
D. In the event anOwner attempts 10 increase without complying ' widhthe provisions
of this Agreement, such an increase shall be deemed null and void, and Residents shall not bo
required to pay such increase.
E. In the event the park Resident Cominittee questions the validity of a request to
increase ordecrease Rent, said cnnooiUoccouy request City to review said request. Owner
agrees to noeo1 with City and Donidout {`000nziUee, and ahuU provide documentation explaining
the validity of any such request ua provided herein. Said increase shall not bc valid until
approved in writing by the City Manager or his designee Lohciu compliance with this
Agreement.
0, Voluntary Vacancies. lo addition to any other adjustments to Rent allowed under
paragraph 7/(l hereof, and notwithstanding the limitation providing for only one rental
adjustment per year to the Base Rent pursuant to Paragraph 7(B), Owner shall he permitted to
increase the Base Rent applicable iou Mobile Home Space upon u voluntary vacancy o[the
space byun amount not greater than \ofiffuen percent (|5%)of the Base Rent for the Mobile
]1oouc Space applicable uL the time of the voluntary vacancy. Tile Base Rent oil upodicu1uz
Mobile Home Space shall not beincreased due tou voluntary vacancy more frequently than once
io any thirty-six (30)0000thperiod.
9' Discretion for Lower Adjustments. Nothing in this Auzconoeo1 yhn)| be construed as
requiring un Owner {o adjust Rents each ycurnroa preventing uu Owner from adjusting Rent tu
levels }cmu than those herein allowed. Further, Owner shall give good faith consideration to o
Resident's request to bc relieved from an increase in Rent allowable hereunder due tV that
Resident's suffering substantial economic hardship.
IU. Responsibilities of Owner.
A. Owner agrees that during the tumof this Agreement Owner shall furnish all of
the facilities and utilities listed nu Exhibit '"/\" hereto to all Residents utoo extra charge. ()vvuer
also agrees to provide and maintain in satisfactory working order and condition, during the \000
o[ this Agreement, all physical iuzyrovonzcntm and oonzoIoo facilities and areas within the Mobile
Home Park which are listed on Exhibit "A" hereto. Owner shall also comply with all
requirements set for-thiothe Mobile Home Residency Luw. Notwithstanding the foregoing, with
the consent oFCity, Owner may reduce or eliminate a service within the Mobile Home Park or to
any Resident which does not affect the health, safety and welfare of any Resident, provided that
u proportionate share o[ the cost savings resulting from such reduction or elimination iapassed
ou10 the Residents in the fbnoofa decrease inRent. l[u Mobile Home Park Owner who
provides utility services, reduces or eliminates such service by separate metering or other lawful
means o[ transferring tn the Resident, the obligation for payment for such services, the cost
savings shall be deemed to be the cost of such transferred utility sei vice for the twelve (12)
months prior to the iuotu1ln1iou and use nf the metering system reasonably apportioned to exclude
common area costs.
For the purposes o[ this section, io detennining cost savings |obc passed nuiothe
resident io the form of decreased Rent, the cost of installation of separate utility meters, or
similar coats to Mobile }{oroe Park Owner to shift the obligation per payment of utility costs to
the Resident, shall not bcconsidered.
B. The Owner shall meet upon reasonable notice with the Resident Committee
recognized by resolution of the City Council or as required by the Mobile Home Residency Law.
P160
There shall be a minimum of one meeting per year to generally discuss general park welfare, or
City and Community items of importance. The Owner or his/her/its authorized representative
shall also meet with the Resident Committee within thirty (30) days of a written request by the
Resident Committee and prior to:
(1) Alterations or deletions of amenities, services, or equipment; or
(2) Changes to the Mobile Home Park rules and regulations.
With respect to any concerns submitted in writing by the Resident Committee to
the Owner, the Owner shall provide a written response to the action items within twenty (20)
days after the meeting.
11. Renegotiation at Expiration of Agreement. Within the six (6) month period prior to
the termination of this Agreement, Owner and City may renegotiate the terms of this Agreement.
12. Remedies.
A. City shall enforce the provisions of this Agreement on behalf of a Resident or
Residents in the event of breach of or noncompliance with this Agreement by Owner.
B. Any Resident aggrieved by a breach of or noncompliance with this Agreement by
an Owner shall, as a third party beneficiary of this Agreement, have the right on such resident's
own behalf to prosecute a civil action against Owner, in any court of competent jurisdiction, to
enforce the provisions of this Agreement or recover damages for the breach hereof,
13. Miscellaneous.
A. This Agreement supersedes all prior agreements, amendments, supplements,
addenda and/or extensions of any agreements between the City and each and/or all of the Owners
listed below, and all exhibits or appendices attached thereto, providing for a mobile home Z:1
accord, an annual maximum rent adjustment or as otherwise relating to or with respect to the
subject matter of this Agreement.
B. This Agreement shall be interpreted according to the laws of the State of
California.
C. The provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the
benefit of the heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns of each Owner.
D. If any provision of this Agreement or the application thereof to any person or
circumstance is held to be unlawful or is otherwise invalidated by a final judgment of any court
of competent Jurisdiction, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this
Agreement which can be implemented without the invalid provision or application, and, to this
end, the provisions of this Agreement are deemed to be severable.
E. To the extent that the context of this Agreement so requires, the singular shall
include the plural and the masculine, feminine and neuter genders shall each include the other.
N
F. This Agreement may not be altered, amended or revoked except by an instrument
in writing executed by City and all Owners who are signatories hereto.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amended and Restated
Agreement on the day and year first above written.
Attest:
M
City of Rancho Cucamonga
A iriunicipal corporation
M
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
Linda A. Troyan, City Clerk
Approved as to Form:
M
James L. Markman, City Attorney
Owner: Alta Laguna Mobile Home Estates
M
Name:
Title:
Owner: Alta Vista Mobile Home Park
In
Name:
Title:
Owner: Casa Volante Mobile Home Park
IN
-9-
Name:
Title:
ores
Owner: Chaparral Heights Mobile Home Park
By:
Name:
Title:
Owner: The Pines Mobile Home Park
Bv:
Russell C. Jay Family Trust
dated October 22, 1987
General Partner
By:
Name:
Title:
By:
The Ben Rochelle Revocable Trust
dated August 9, 1998
General Partner
By:
Ben Rochelle
Owner: Ramona Villa Mobile Home Park
By:
Name:
Title:
M
Name:
Title:
Owners: Sycamore Villa Mobile Home Park
By:
Name:
Title:
M-
Name:
-10-
amen
Attachment: Exhibit "A"
-11-
Title:
P163
The Groves on Foothill
c% FMM L L C
December 16, 2015
The Honorable City Council
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
RE: Rent Accord Extension
(re: The Groves at Foothill / 9340 Foothill Blvd)
Council Members:
December 16, 2015, 2015 City Council Meeting
Consent Calendar -Accord Extension
Unfortunately we were not made aware of tonight's meeting until earlier this week and as such
have been unable to adjust our schedules to allow us to attend and share in person our ongoing
commitment to good faith stewardship of our MHP in general accordance with the Accord.
Our family has been the sole and continuous owner of the subject property in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga for over S decades. We appreciate and respect the good working
relationship we've had with city /staff through 3 generations of the Hillgren family and will
continue to work professionally and positively to see that it continues as such in the future.
We have been a party to the Accord since its inception and continue to support the basic
spirit /intentions of the agreement. As such, we wish you to know that we intend to continue to
comply with and administrate The Groves as informal, non - signers to the renewal pursuant to
the basic terms and conditions of the renewed Accord except for the single parenthetical
clause in Section 7.C(b) which in concert with Proposition 13 uniquely affects and creates an
extraordinary economic disadvantage /disparity as a direct result of our family's SS+ years of
continuous ownership and stewardship of this community.
We recognize the responsibilities of MHP ownership and respect the unique relationship we
enjoy with our residents. In an effort to resolve this issue, we have proposed and will honor a
thoughtful, responsible and fair mitigation plan which specifically addresses and moderates any
potential hardships which might (or might not ever) immediately impact our Park's coach
owners, or might otherwise be caused by such a transitional event, if it should ever occur in the
future.
We wish each of you, the city staff and the residents of Rancho Cucamonga a bright 2016.
Very truly yours,
( kecet vvul Vca- ema),( '-I -1 �P [5)
Bradley R. Hillgren
C00
sr. 1I
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Date: December 16, 2015
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
John R. Gillison, City Manager
From: Nettie Nielsen, Community Services Director
By: Christen Mitchell, Management Analyst II J
Subject: CONSIDERATION TO APPORVE THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
THE "CONSTRUCTION OF LOS AMIGOS PARK" AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY
CLERK TO ADVERTISE THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS ", TO BE FUNDED
FROM ACCOUNT NO. 1235305 - 5650/1754235 -0.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve the plans and specifications for the
Construction of Los Amigos Park and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City
Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids ", to be funded from account number 1235305-
5650/1754235 -0.
I=3_T*ixg ne111�1171-.1 ih,FAW &Jn�
The City was awarded a $3.9 million dollar Proposition 84 Grant in 2010 to build an
approximately 3.5 acre park on a vacant parcel on Madrone Avenue (just north of 9th
Street) now referred to as the future Los Amigos Park site. The park will include an outdoor
fitness area, running and walking trail, playground and water play area, picnic area, multi-
purpose field, skate spot, basketball court and a community art element. All features of the
park are required grant deliverables.
Legal advertising is scheduled for December 22, 2015 and December 29, 2015 with a bid
opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, February 2, 2016 unless extended by Addenda. A
mandatory pre -bid job walk is scheduled at 10:00 a.m. on Thursday, January 7, 2016. It is
a requirement of the grant that the park be completed by March 2017.
Respectfully submitted,
Nettie Nielsen
Community Services Director
Attachment
allve
RESOLUTION NO. 15-219
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS
AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF LOS
AMIGOS PARK AN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE T0 RECEIVE
WHEREAS, it is the iOteOdOD Of the {}hv Of Rancho Cucamonga to CODSt[uoi
certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
WHEREAdS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and
specifications for the construction of certain improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that the plans and specifications pnoonnkad by the City
Of Rancho CUC8DlODg8 be and are hereby approved as the p|8DS and specifications for the
"CONSTRUCTION OF LOS AMIGOS PARK".
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and
directed to 8dv8[bS8 as [8qUi[9d by haw for the receipt Of sealed bids or proposals for doing the
work specified in the 8fOn8S8id plans and Sp8CifiC8tiUOS. which said advertisement Gh8]| be
substantially in the following words and figures, tOwit:
"NOTICE
Pursuant to8 Resolution Ofthe Council Of the City Of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino
County, California, din8CbDg this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City Of RRDChO
CUC8DlOOg8 will F8C8iVe at the Office Of the City (}|8[k in the offices Of the City Of Rancho
CUCa0ODQG' UO Or bDfO[8 the hUU[ Of 2:00 p.0. DD FEBRUARY 2' 2016. SB8|ed bids Or
proposals for the " CONSTRUCTION OF LOS AK4|G{JS PARK" in said City.
A MANDATORY pre-bid meeting is scheduled for 10:00 a.m. on JANUARY 7, 2016' at the
Public Works Service Center |OC818d at 8794 Lions Street, R8OChO [}UC80OOga CA 91730 and
then the future Los Amigos Park site located 8t8O25 Mad[OneAV8Ou8' south of Arrow Route,
m
Oo�hOfEY Street (APNO2O7-2O2-57). This meeting iStO allow Bidders the opportunity tOview
the project site. BiddS[S' attendance at this DlO8tiDg is 8 prerequisite for bidding OD the project.
Bids will be publicly opened and [88d in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive,
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730.
Bids O0USt be rO8d8 on 8 fO[0 provided for the pU[pO88' addressed to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for the CONSTRUCTION [)F LOS AMIGOS PARK."
PREVAILING WAGE: NOdCg is hereby given that in 8CCOrd8DCe with the pr0ViSiODS Of
California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2. the CODt[8CtO[ is required
to pay not less than the g8O8[8| prevailing [8t8 0f per them wages for work Of B similar character
iD the locality iD which the public work iS performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate
Of per them wages for holiday and overtime work. |D that regard, the Director Of the Department
Of |DdUSt[i8| R8|8dODS of the State Of California is [8qU/[8d to and has determined such g8De[8/
prevailing rates Of per dieOO vv8g88. Copies Of such p[6V8i|iDg [8t8G Of per di8m wages are on
file in the office of the City Clerk, City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, R8DChO
CUC80ODg8, California, and are available to any interested party on request. They can also be
Resolution No. 15-219- Page 1 of 4
P166
found 81 under the °St8bEtiCG and Research" Tab. The COOt[@CtiDQ Agency
also shall cause 8 copy Of such determinations tOb8 posted 8t the job site.
NO COOtr8CtO[ or SUbCOOt[8ntO[ may be listed OD a bid p[OpOSa| for 8 public vvo[kS project
(submitted OO Or after March 1. 2015) un|8SS [8giGt8[8d with the [}Sp8rtOO8Dt Of |DdUS|[i8|
RS|8tiODS pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5 (with limited exceptions from this [8qui[eDloDt
for bid purposes only under Labor Code section 1771.1(8)\.
NO contractor 0[subcontractor may be 8Vv8[d8d 8 contract for public work OD 8 public works
p[O]8Ct (awarded OO or 8jt8[ April 1. 2015) uO)8SG registered with the [)8p8rtDl8Ot Of |DdUSt[i8|
Relations pursuant tO Labor Code section 1725.5.
This project is subject to CODlp/i8DC8 monitoring and 8nfOro8Ol8Dt by the Department Of
|ndUSt[i8| Relations.
For all new projects 8VV8rd8dUnOr8f&erAoh|1.2O15'th8CODh8CtO[SeOdSubDOD[[8CtOnSDlUSt
furnish electronic certified p8V[OU records tOthe Labor Commissioner.
The requirement to furnish 8/eCtPODiC certified p8Vn3U r8COnd8 to the Labor CO[DDliSGiOAe[ will
apply to all public VVO[kS projects, Vvh8th8[ new Or ODgOiDg. beginning January 1' 2018.
Pursuant to p[Ovi8iOO8 Of Labor Code Section 1775' the C0Dt[8CtO[ Sh8U forfeit, as pOO8(tv to the
City of Fl8DChO CUC80OOg8' not more than two hundred dOU8nG ($200.00) for each |/bO[8['
VvOrkOl8D. Or On8Ch8DiC employed for each C8|8Od8r day or portion thereof, if such |8bOn2r.
vvOrkOl3D or mechanic is paid |8GS than the general pF8V@i|iDg rate Of VvGQ8S h8nSiO bgfOn3
stipulated for any work done under the attached o0Dt[8Ct' by him 0[by any subcontractor UOdg[
him, iD violation 0fthe provisions Df said Labor Code.
Att8OdOD is directed to the pn]ViSiOOS in S8CUODS 1777.5 and 1777.6 Of the [8b0[ Code
concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him.
S8CbOO 1777.5, 88 8Ol8OdSd. requires the Contractor O[ subcontractor employing t[8d8SOl8D in
8DV8pp[8DUC8b|8 OCCUp8don to apply to the joint apprenticeship nOOO[Ditt88 nearest the site of
the public vVO[k8 project and which adrDiOiStS[S the apprenticeship p[Ogn8Dl in that trade for a
certificate Ofapproval. The certificate will also fix the ratio Of apprentices tO journeymen that will
be used in the performance Uf the contract. The ratio Of apprentices to jOU[D8y[D8D in such
cases shall not ba less than one tO five except:
A. When UD8FDp|OynO8Dt in the area Of COV8r8g8 by the joint apprenticeship
COnl[Ditt88 has 8XC8ed8d an average Of 15 p8[C8Dt in the 90 days prior to the request Of
certificate, or
B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to
five, or
C. When the trade can show that it is [8p[8CiDg at least 1/30 Of its nn8[Db8[Ghip
through apprenticeship training Un8D annual basis statewide O[ locally, O[
D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he 8Dlp|OyS [8giGtR[8d 8pp[8DtiC8G
OO all Of his CODtr8CtS on an 8OOUa| 8v8[8gS Of not |8SS than one apprentice to Hight
]OU[DgyOn8D.
The CODt[8CtO[ is required to Dl8h8 CODt[ibUtiODS to funds established for the administration Of
apprenticeship p[Og[8DlG if he 8Dlp|Oy8 [8giS[8[ed 8pp[8DUC8S or jOUrD8ynn8O in any
8pp[eDbC3b|e trade OO such C0Dt[GCtS and if other CoOt[8CtOng on the public YVO[kS site are
Resolution No. 15-219- Page 2 of 4
making such contributions.
The Contractor and subcontractor under him Sh8U comply with the requirements of GeCbOOS
1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices.
Information relative k] apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may
be obtained from the Director Of |DduSth8| Re|oti0DS, on-OffiCiO the Administrator Of
Apprenticeship, San Fr8DCiSCO. California, or from the OiViSiOD of Apprenticeship Standards and
its branch offices.
Eight KB hours Of labor shall COOShtUta 8 legal dovS work for all vvo[kDl8D 8Dlp|OV8d in the
execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with
and be gOV8[D8d by the |avVS Of the State of California having to d0 with vvO[kiDg hOU[S as set
forth in Division 2, Part 7. Chapter 1. Article 3 Of the Labor Code of the State Of California 88
amended.
The Contractor or Subcontractor shall forfeit, 8S8 penalty to the City of R8OChO CUC8rDOOg8,
twenty-five d0U8rS /$25.00\ for each VVO[her 8Olp|Oygd in the 8x8CUhOO Of the COOtr8Ct by the
respective contractor O[ subcontractor for each calendar day during which the worker iSrequired
or permitted to work more than 8 hours in any one C8|8Dd8[ day and 40 hOU[S in any one
Ce|8Dd8[ week in ViU|EdiOO Of the pR}ViSiODS Of this article. COntn3CtO[ agrees to pay i[8v8| and
subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such
travel and subsistence payments are defined iD the applicable collective bargaining agreement
filed iO accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.1.
The bidder must submit with his proposal, C8Sh' cashier's check, certified Ch8Ch, or bidder's
bond, payable to the City Of R8DChO Cucamonga for an 80OUOi 8qU8| to 81 (88S 10% Of the
amount O|said hid as 8 gU8[8Ot88 that the bidder will 8Ot8[ into the pn]pOS8d COntn3Ct if the
S8DlB is 8vv8nd8d to him, and in event Offailure to enter into such contract said C8Sh. cashiers'
check, certified check, O[ bond shall become the property of the City Of Rancho Cucamonga.
If the City of R8DChO CUC8DlOng8 awards the contract k}the D8Xt k]VVaGt bidder, the amount Of
the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference
between the low bid and the G8C0Dd lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned t0the
lowest bidder.
The amount Ofthe bond to be given CO G8CUr8 8f8ithfU| p8rfOnO8DC8 of the contract for said
work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an 8ddidOD8| bond in an amount equal t0
100% of the contract price for said work shall be given tO secure the payment Of claims for any
rD8t8ri8(S or supplies furnished for the pBrfOr[n8nC8 of the work contracted to be done by the
CDDtn3Cto[. O[ any work or labor Of any kind done th8[eUD. and the Contractor will also be
required to furnish 8 certificate that he carries CO[Dp8nS8tiOD iOSUnROC8 covering his 8OOp|Oy98S
UpOD work to be dOD8 under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City
of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work.
Contractor shall pOSG88S any and RU CO[d[eot0[ |iCSDSeQ' in form and C|8SG as required by any
and all 8ppUC8b|8 |8VVS with respect LO any and all of the VVO[k to be performed UOd8[ this
o0Dt[8Ct; |OC|udiOg, but not limited to, a Class "A" License /G8DenG| Engineering COOtr8CiOh in
8SCOKj8DCe with the p[OViGiOOS Of the CUOt[8CtOr'S UC8n88 Law (California BUSiD8GG and
Professions Code, Section 7OOO et. 88q] and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto.
The Contractor, pursuant tOthe "California BuSiO8SG and Professions Code," G8CtiOD 7028.15'
Sh8U indicate his or her State LiC8OS8 Number OD the bid. together with the expiration date, and
be signed by the COOtn@CtO[ deC|8[iDg, under penalty Of p8jury, that the i[fOUD81iOD being
provided iS true and correct.
Resolution No. 15-219- Page 3 of 4
The vvO[k is to be dnD8 in accordance with the profiles, pkaOS. and specifications of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk 8t 10500 QViC C|8DtB[ [}hV8, Rancho
Cucamonga, California.
In an effort to QO gR38O and p8p8d8S8' digital COpi8S Of the p|8OS' specifications, and bid
proposal, including any future addenda O[ revisions tD the bid documents, are available bygoing
to www.ciplist.com and signing up, by going to Member Login or Member Signup (it's free), then
ChOOS8 California, then SCnOU dOvvD to G8D B8[D8[diDO County and click on Bn]vV88 Q[i8S, then
SO[OU dOVVD to Rancho CUo8nOODg8 and click OD City Projects, then click OO the Project Of
interest under the 7-i1|8 and fOUOvv directions for download. Note, copies Of the p|8DS'
Sp8OifiC8tiODS. bid proposal, 8ddeOdUDlS8Od revisions will not be provided, digital COpi8S must
be dOVVD|O8d8d from the 8b0V8 VVebSb8 then printed. Prospective bidders must register for 8O
8CCOUDi OD www.ciplist.com to be iOC|Ud8d OD the pnOSp8[tiV8 bidder's list(s) and to [eC8iV8
8DO8i| updates Of any addenda or [8viSiOOS to the bid dOCUnn8ntS. Be advised that the
information contained OO this site may Ch8Dg8 over time and without DOdCe to prospective
bidders Or registered users. While effort iG made i0 keep information current and accurate and
to notify registered prospective bidders Of any changes t0 the bid d0CU08OtS' it is the
responsibility of each prOSp8CUv8 bidder to register with www.ciplist.com and to check this
VV8bSit8OO8 DAILY basis through the close Of bids for any applicable addenda Orupdates.
No proposal will be considered from mContractor to whom a proposal form has not been
issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to registered prospective bidders from
vvvum/'cipUio1'oonn'
The GuCC8SSfU| bidder will be n8qUinBd to enter into R CODt[8Ct satisfactory to the City of R8OChO
Cucamonga.
In 8CCOrd8OCB with the r8qUi[8nn8ntG Of GeCbOO 9'3.2 Of the GeD8[8/ Provisions, as set forth in
the P|8DS and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be dOD8 by the COOt[8CtO[. the
Contractor may, UpOO the Contractor's request and at the CODt[8CtO['S SO|8 cost and 8np8DG8,
substitute authorized securities iD lieu Of monies withheld (performance [Bt8DUOO).
The City Of Rancho Cucamonga, reserves the right tO reject 8DVO[8||bidS.
(]UeGUOOS regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for "CONSTRUCTION OF LOS AMIGOS PARK"
may be directed to:
CHRISTEN MITCHELL
10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
(909) 477-2770, ext. 2105
Christen. Mitchell@ CitVof RC. us
ADVERTISE ON:
December 22 and December 29, 2015
Resolution No. 15-219- Page 4 of 4
P169
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
John R. Gillison, City Manager
FROM: Linda A. Troyan, City Clerk Services Director
SUBJECT: Consideration to extend the application deadline date for the West -Side
Districts Citizens' Oversight Committee to January 19, 2016.
Staff recommends extending the application deadline date to January 19, 2016 at 5:00 p.m.
BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS:
The City Council approved the formation of the West -Side Landscape Maintenance District
Citizens' Oversight Committee on November 17, 2015. The committee will consist of five
(5) Rancho Cucamonga citizens who own property and reside in any of the West -Side
districts.
The City Clerk's Office began accepting applications November 18, 2015. Applications are
due by 5:00 p.m. on December 22, 2015. Staff conducted recruitment for the committee by
publishing two display ads in the Daily Bulletin and posting notices on the City's website, at
City Hall and both libraries as well as on RCTV and City Hall Lobby monitor. Additionally, it
will be advertised on the City's two electronic billboards located within the West -Side
District.
Fourteen applications have been requested, however, only one has been received.
Extending the date for receipt of applications would increase awareness of the committee
and allow as much time as possible for people to apply,
,.
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES GROUP
Date: December 16, 2015
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
President and Members of the Board of Directors
John R. Gillison, City Manager
From: Ingrid Y. Bruce, Deputy Director, Department of Innovation and Technology
P170
Subject: APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT EXTENSION BETWEEN CALAMP RADIO
SATELLITE INTEGRATORS, INC. AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR
AUTOMATIC VEHICLE LOCATION (AVL) SYSTEM EXTENDED WARRANTY AND
WIRELESS FEES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $71,340
TO BE FUNDED FROM FIRE DISTRICT ACCOUNT NUMBERS 3281501 -5300 -
$4,830; 3282502 -5300 - $3,860; 3283501 -5300 - $970 AND FROM CITY VEHICLE
AND EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND ACCOUNT NUMBER 1712001 -5300
$61,680 ALL IN CONTRACT SERVICES.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the contract extension agreement between
CALAMP Radio Satellite Integrators, Inc. and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Automatic Vehicle
Location (AVL) System extended warranty and wireless fees for Fiscal Year 2015/16 in the total
amount of $71,340 to be funded from Fire District account numbers 3281501 -5300 - $4,830;
3282502 -5300 - $3,860; 3283501 -5300 - $970 and from City Vehicle and Equipment Replacement
Fund account number 1712001 -5300 - $61,680, all in contract services.
BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS:
In 2008, the City implemented a citywide integrated Automatic Vehicle Location (AVL) System to
enhance the ability to increase safety and productivity, efficiently monitor various city operations,
and improve service to citizens. Additionally, the AVL system maximizes effectiveness of
dispatching crews for various public works issues, enhances the City's ability to manage emergency
resources by locating and dispatching the nearest unit, and provides customized reports for
resource allocation and vehicle function monitoring (i.e. ignition, idling, alarms, sensors, etc.) which
can be archived or maintained as needed and later analyzed. The AVL system provides real -time
location and status data on customized AVL mapping utilizing the City's GIS map data and uses a
wireless gateway between the vehicle fleet and the base center for all City and Fire District non -
emergency vehicles, resulting in necessary monthly wireless fees.
Warranty on this system is necessary to maintain it full capabilities. Therefore, staff is
recommending that the warranty contract extension be approved for one year with the option to
renew annually for up to five years. CALAMP Radio Satellite Integrators, Inc. and the City of
Rancho Cucamonga may terminate this agreement upon providing thirty (30) calendar days' prior
written notice.
Respectfully submitted,
d
P171
STAFF REPoRT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Date: December 16, 2015 RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
John R. Gillison, City Manager
From: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director
By: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner
Subject: Second Reading of Ordinance No. 882 approving Victoria Community Plan Amendment
DRC2015 -00390 changing the Victoria Community Plan Zoning Designation for 10.94
acres of land from Medium (M) Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) to Village
Commercial (VC) related to the construction of a 100,135 square foot 9- building multi -
tenant retail center at the northwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road.
The Amendment also includes changing the zoning designation for 4 contiguous acres
of land from Medium (M) Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low Medium (LM)
Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) and a text amendment clarifying development
standards — APN's: 1089 - 031 -15, 16, 35 and a portion of 1089 - 031 -14.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council approve the second reading of Ordinance Number 882 as acted upon
by the City Council at a public hearing at the December 2, 2015 meeting, thereby amending the Victoria
Community Plan Zoning Designation for 10.94 acres of land at the northwest corner of Day Creek
Boulevard from Medium (M) Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) to Village Commercial (VC). The
Amendment also includes changing the zoning designation of 4 contiguous acres of land from Medium (M)
Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low Medium (LM) Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre)
and a text amendment clarifying development standards.
BACKGROUND:
On December 2, 2015, staff provided an oral presentation at a public hearing of the City Council detailing
the zoning and text amendments prescribed in Ordinance No. 882. The amendment changes the Victoria
Community Plan Zoning Designation for 10.94 acres of land at the northwest corner of Day Creek
Boulevard from Medium (M) Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) to Village Commercial (VC). The
Amendment also includes changing the zoning designation of 4 contiguous acres of land from Medium (M)
Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to Low Medium (LM) Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre)
and a text amendment clarifying development standards. The Ordinance is consistent with the land use
designation of the General Plan which was also amended on December 2, 2015. The City Council also
reviewed and approved the related environmental documents, which included a new environmental
mitigation measure related to Biological Resources.
Respectfully submitted,
Candyce B111-nett
Planning Director
CB:TV /Is
P172
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN
AMENDMENT DRC2015- 00390, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE VICTORIA
COMMUNITY PLAN ZONING DESIGNATION FOR 10.94 ACRES OF LAND
FROM MEDIUM (M) RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO
VILLAGE COMMERCIAL (VC) RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF A
100,135 SQUARE FOOT 9- BUILDING MULTI- TENANT RETAIL CENTER
AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND
BASE LINE ROAD. THE AMENDMENT ALSO INCLUDES CHANGING THE
ZONING DESIGNATION FOR 4 CONTIGUOUS ACRES OF LAND FROM
MEDIUM (M) RESIDENTIAL (8 -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW
MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND A
TEXT AMENDMENT CLARIFYING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS; AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN'S: 1089-031-15,16,
35 AND A PORTION OF 1089 - 031 -14,
A. Recitals.
1. Lewis Retail Centers filed an application for the approval of Victoria Community Plan
Amendment DRC2015 -00390 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this
Resolution, the subject Victoria Community Plan Amendment request is referred to as "the
application."
2. On the 10th day of November, 2015, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing with respect to the above referenced Victoria
Community Plan Amendment DRC2015 -00390 and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its
Resolution No. 15 -69, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt
said Victoria Community Plan Amendment.
3. On the 2nd day of December, 2015, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the
Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
SECTION 2: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the
above - referenced public hearing on December 2nd, 2015, including written and oral staff reports,
together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to a property located at the northwest corner of Day Creek
Boulevard and Base Line Road in the Medium (M) Zoning District of the Victoria Community Plan;
and
P173
PLANNING COMMISSION ORDINANCE NO. 882
VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2O1b-00380
LEVV|G RETAIL CENTER
DECEMBER 2.2O15
Page
b. To the north iaRCFPD Station 173 within the Community Facilities (CF) Zoning
District and vacant land within the Medium (M) Zoning District of the Victoria Community Plan; b]the
south is vacant land within the Regionally Related Office/Commercial (RROC) Zoning District of the
Victoria COOlDlUnitv Plan; to the east are single-family residences within the LDvv K8ediUDl (LM)
Zoning District Of the Victoria Community Plan; and. t0 the west iSGSan Bernardino County Flood
CDDtnD| K4aiDLeD8DCe `/and within the Medium (K8) Zoning District of the Victoria ConoDlUDib/ Plan;
and
C. The General Plan Land Use Designation of the project SiteieLovvK4ediunn(LM)
Residential. The project site is within the Victoria Community Plan area with a zoning designation of
Medium (M) Residential. The applicant has submitted a General Plan Amendment to change the
General P|8D Land Use Designation for the 10.94 8Cne project site to Neighborhood CODlrnerui8|
(NC) and a Victoria Community Plan Amendment to change the Victoria Community Plan Zoning
Designation for the 10.94 acre project ait8tO Village Commercial /VC\ and tO change the zoning
designation for 4 acres north of the project aite tO Low Medium (LK8) Residential; and
d. The Victoria Community Plan Amendment also includes a text amendment stating
that "building setbacks to be determined through the development approval process;" and
g. The application isiO conjunction vviththeeubdiViSiOnOf14.008C[eoofV8C8Ot|and
into O parcels (related file: GUBTPM19637) including 10.08 3C[eS Of |8Od for the purpose of
developing a 100.135 square foot multi-tenant retail center (related file: ORC2015-00388) and
acre remainder parcel for the future development of a multi-family senior housing project.
SECTION : Based upon the substantial evidence presented tothis Council during the
above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1
and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes aofollows:
8. The proposed Victoria Community Plan Amendment does not conflict with the Land
Use Policies Of the General Plan and will provide for the d8V8|OpOneOt. within the diSt[iCt, in a
manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development. The project inC|UdBS a
request to amend the General Plan Land Use Designation from Low Medium (LM) Residential to
Neighborhood Commercial (NC). The proposed Victoria Community Plan Amendment will bring the
zoning designation Of the project siteintOCOnfnrrn8Dc8vviththeprnpoSedGenero|P|8DLondUSe
Designation. GBDOr8| Plan Policy LU-1.3 encourages the development Of commercial centers that
serve 8 broad range of retail and a8rViC8 needs of the community. The proposed cVnnnne[Cia/
development is consistent with the intent of the proposed General P|8O and Victoria Community
Plan Amendments.
b. The proposed Victoria Community Plan Amendment does promote the goals and
objectives Of the Victoria Community Plan which in turn are consistent with and implement the goals
and objectives of the General Plan. These goals include promoting the economical and efficient use
of land, promoting design and construction techniques that are responsive to the environment, and
promoting development compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed text and
zoning amendment will naou|t in a commercial development that is consistent with the goals and
objectives of the Victoria Community Plan and will be indistinguishable in overall quality and design
from existing development in the surrounding area.
C. The proposed Victoria Community Plan Amendment will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
PLANNING COK8M|G8|{JN ORDINANCE NO. 882
VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2015-00390
LEWIS RETAIL (}ENTER
DECEMBER 2. 2O15
Page
The proposed Victoria Community Plan Amendment will provide for @ commercial development that
is separated from the surrounding residential land uses by two public streets which will mitigate any
negative impacts created by the conlDl8[cia| center. The amendment will not iDCveoag traffic in a
manner that is beyond that which the roads were designed to aCConOnood3[8 or overwhelm the
existing public facilities; and
d. The proposed enlBDdOnent is in conformance with the General Plan. The G8O8ng|
Plan states that the intent of the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) Land Use District is for small-scale
shopping centers (5 to 15 acres in size) located near or within residential neighborhoods. The 10.94
acre project site is |nogtBd at the corner of two major St[88tS and is 885i|y accessible from the
SU[[oUOdiDg residences; and
e. In conjunction with the approval of General Plan Amendment OR[|2O15-00388. the
proposed Victoria Community Plan Amendment will be consistent with the objectives of the Victoria
Community Plan. The 10.94 acre project site is located aL the intersection of two major Stn9ets. Day
Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road, and is well suited for the proposed commercial development.
The project site is separated from surrounding reaid8DU8| |GOd uses by public streets, limiting any
potential noise and glare issues. The project vVi||beCorne3DiOt8gr@|partOftheSUrnOundinQ3re3.
SECTION : Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated
Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental
assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there iSDo substantial evidence that the
project will have @ significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative
Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program attached hereto' and incorporated herein by this
reference, based UpDD the findings as follows:
8. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CE{}A) and the City's |oCo|
CE(]A GVida|iOSS' the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential eDvi[Vnnoont8| Bff8CtS of
the project. G9oaed DO the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the
imposition of mitigation rDeaSunaa, there would be no substantial evidence that the project vvOu|d
have 8 significant effect on the environment. Based OD that deterrniO8UOO. a Mitigated Negative
Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice Of the public comment
period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration.
b. The City Council has reviewed the Mitigated Negative O8daredVn and the
CorD[neO[S received from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife /CDFVV\ regarding the
Mitigated Negative Declaration and based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated
Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that based on the imposition
of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect
on the environment. During the Public {}onnrneOt Period, staff received conoDl8DtS from the
California Department Of Fish and Wildlife /CDFVV\. TO address COFVV comments, staff modified
one Ofthe existing Dlidg8UOO [neaeu[BS in Initial Study Parts || and |||' shortening the period of time
prior to earth moving activity for performing a nesting bird survey. The modified mitigation measure
was [8ViBVved by the Planning Commission. The City Council finds that the Mitigated Negative
Declaration reflects the independent judgment and 8D8|ySis of the City Council. Based on these
findings, the City Council hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration.
C. The City Council has also nBVi8vV8d and considered the Mitigation Monitoring
Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources
Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the
P175
PLANNING COMMISSION ORDINANCE NO. 882
VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2O15-0O39O
LEWIS RETAIL CENTER
DECEMBER 2.2O15
Page
mitigation measures during project inlp|8nUentotoO.TheCitvCounCi|Ule[efone8d0oteUle Mitigation
Monitoring Program for the project; 8Od
d. The custodian of records for the |nib8| Study, Mitigated Negative DeC|8[8UoO'
Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the FeoOnd of proceedings
Upon which the City COUOCi|'S decision is based is the Planning OiPBCtO[ of the City Of Rancho
Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review iO the Planning Department Ofthe
City of Rancho Cucamonga located at1O5OO Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California
S173U. telephone /0O9\477-275O.
SECTION : The Victoria Community P|8O is hereby amended to change the Victoria
Community P|8D Zoning Designation for 10.94 8CneS Of |@Dd from K8ediU[D (K8) Residential /4-8
dwelling units per acre) tV Village Commercial /VC\. The Amendment also includes changing the
zoning designation for 4 contiguous acres Of land from Medium (M) Residential /8'14 dwelling units
per 3C[8\ to LOvv Medium (LM) Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and 3 text amendment
clarifying commercial development standards, as shown in Attachments A and B.
SECTION : If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance
is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of
competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not
affect the validity 0f the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council Of the City ofRancho
Cucamonga hereby declares that it vvOU|d have adopted this Ordinance and each section,
subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or words thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more
sections, SWbSe[tiona, o|8uSeS, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or
unconstitutional o[ preempted by subsequent legislation.
SECTION : The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the
same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland V8||8y Daily
Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
and circulated iD the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
P176
0
It
C1'1Y CLERh /RECORDS M-ANAGEMENT
DATE: December 16, 2015
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
John R. Gillison, City Manager
FROM: Linda A. Troyan, City Clerk Services Director
SUBJECT: Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 883 Adding Chapter 2.14 to the
Municipal Code relating to Electronic and Paperless Filing of Fair Political
Practices Commission (FPPC) Campaign Disclosure Statements.
jaxereliva►vil
It is respectfully recommended that the City Council adopt Ordinance No. 883 adding Chapter 2,14 of
the Municipal Code regarding electronic and paperless filing of Fair Political Practices Commission
(FPPC) campaign disclosure statements.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The introduction and first reading of Ordinance 883 was conducted at the December 2, 2015 Regular
City Council meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
a
Lin Tro yn, MMC
--citly Clerk Services Director
Attachment A — Ordinance 883
P177
ATTACHMENT "A"
ORDINANCE NO. 883
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ADDING CHAPTER 2.14 TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ELECTRONIC AND
PAPERLESS FILING OF FAIR POLITICAL PRACTICES COMMISSION CAMPAIGN
DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows:
Section 1. Purpose and Authority.
The purpose of this Ordinance is to add the option of filing Campaign Disclosure
Statements by elected officials, candidates, or committees electroncially. The City Council
enacts this Ordinance in accordance with the authority granted to cities by State law.
Section 2. Findings
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga finds and determines as follows:
A. That California Government Code Section 84615 provides that a legislative body of a
local government agency may adopt an ordinance that requires an elected officer,
candidate, or committee, required to file statements, reports, or other documents
required by Chapter 4 of the Political Reform Act to file such statements, reports or
other documents online or electronically with the City Clerk
B. In any instance in which the original statement is required to be filed with the Secretary
of State and a copy of that statement is required to be filed with the local government
agency, the ordinance may permit, but shall not require, that the copy be filed online
or electronically.
C. The City Council expressly finds and determines that the City Clerk's web -based
system contains multiple safeguards to protect the integrity and security of the data,
and will operate securely and effectively and will not unduly burden filers; and
D. The City Clerk will operate the electronic filing system in compliance with the
requirements of California Government Code Section 84615 and any other applicable
laws.
Section 3. Addition
Chapter 2.14 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby added to read as
follows:
2.14 Electronic Filing of Campaign Disclosure Statements
2.14.010 General.
A. Any elected officer, candidate, or committee required to file statements, reports or
other documents ( "Statements ") as required by Chapter 4 of the Political Reform Act
(California Government Code Section 84100 et seq.) may file such Statements using
the City Clerk's online system according to procedures established by the City Clerk.
These procedures shall ensure that the online system complies with the requirements
set forth in Section 84615 of the Government Code. From and after February 1, 2017,
elected officers, candidates and committees required to file Statements must file such
Statements using the City Clerk's online system, unless exempt from the requirement
to file online pursuant to Government Code Section 84615(a) because the officer,
UKV
candidate or committee receives less than $1,000 in contributions and makes less
than $1,000 in expenditures in a calendar year.
B. The online filing system shall ensure the integrity of the data transmitted and shall
include safeguards against efforts to tamper with, manipulate, alter, or subvert the
data.
C. The online filing system shall only accept a filing in the standardized record format that
is developed by the California Secretary of State pursuant to Section 84602(x)(2) of
the California Government Code and that is compatible with the Secretary of State's
system for receiving an online or electronic filing.
2.14.020 Procedures for Utilizing Online Filing.
A. During the period commencing with the effective date of Ordinance No. 883 and
ending January 31, 2017, an elected officer, candidate, or committee may choose to
utilize the electronic filing system by electronically filing a Statement that is required to
be filed with the City Clerk pursuant to Chapter 4 of the Political Reform Act. Once the
elected officer, candidate, or committee has filed electronically, all subsequent
Statements shall be filed electronically. From and after February 1, 2017, electronic
filing is mandatory unless the officer, candidate, or committee is exempt as described
in Section 2.14.010.A.
B. Any elected officer, candidate, or committee who has electronically filed a statement
using the City Clerk's online system is not required to file a copy of that document in
paper format with the City Clerk.
C. The City Clerk shall issue an electronic confirmation that notifies the filer that the
Statement was received, which notification shall include the date and the time that the
Statement was received and the method by which the filer may view and print the data
received by the City Clerk. The date of filing for a Statement filed online shall be the
day that is received by the City Clerk.
D. If the City Clerk's system is not capable of accepting a Statement, an elected officer,
candidate, or committee shall file that Statement in paper format with the City Clerk.
E. The online filing system shall enable electronic filers to complete and submit filings
free of charge.
2.14.030 Availability of Statements for Public Review; Record Retention
A. The City Clerk's system shall make all the data filed available on the Internet in an
easily understood format that provides the greatest public access. The data shall be
made available free of charge and as soon as possible after receipt. The data made
available on the Internet shall not contain the street name of the persons or entity
representatives listed on the electronically filed forms or any bank account number
required to be disclosed by the filer. The City Clerk's office shall make a complete,
unredacted copy of the statement available to the Fair Political Practices Commission
for 87200 filers.
B. The City Clerk's office shall maintain, for a period of at least 10 years commencing
from the date filed, a secured, official version of each online or electronic statement
which shall serve as the official version of that record for purpose of audits
'JiF001
Section 4. Severabilitv.
In any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance for
any reason shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional; the decision shall not affect the
remaining portions of this Ordinance. The Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
declare that it would have passed this Ordinance and each article, section, subsection,
paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase which is a part thereof, irrespective of the fact that any
one or more articles, sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases are
declared to be invalid or unconstitutional.
Section 5. Effective Date and Publication.
This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption and shall be published
in summary format prior to adoption, and within fifteen (15) days after adoption, in a
newspaper of general circulation published and circulated within the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga this day of by the following vote:
OWN
PLANNING DEP ARTNIENT
Date: December 16, 2015
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director
By: Dominick Perez, Associate Planner
Subject: TIME EXTENSION DRC2015 -01084 — WSI HIGHLAND INVESTMENTS, LLC — A
request to extend the duration of an existing Development Agreement (DRC2003- 00411)
by an additional one (1) year, an agreement for an approved project of 269 single - family
lots on approximately 168.77 acres of land within the Etiwanda North Specific Plan,
located north of the Southern California Edison corridor between Etiwanda Avenue and
East Avenue; APNs: 1087 - 081 -03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, and 09. Related Files: Related
Files: Annexation DRC2003- 01051, Specific Plan Amendment DRC2003- 00409,
General Plan Amendment DRC2003- 00410, Development Agreement Amendment
DRC2003 -00411 M and Time Extension DRC2014- 00876. Staff has found the project to
be within the scope of the project covered by a prior Environmental Impact Report certified
by the City Council on July 21, 2004 (State Clearing House #2003081085) by Resolution
04 -240 and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered
in the Environmental Impact Report.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of a one (1) year Time Extension DRC2015-
01084, by adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval.
ANALYSIS:
A. BACKGROUND: The Development Agreement and project entitlements were originally
reviewed and approved by the City Council on November 3, 2004 (Exhibit A). Following a
hearing held by the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) regarding the annexation
of the property, a lawsuit was filed. After the litigation a settlement agreement was reached
which altered the effective date of the Development Agreement to January 18, 2005. Since the
agreement is in effect for 10 years, the expiration date is January 18, 2016.
The project included a series of actions including the approval of a General Plan Amendment,
Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14749, and the
associated Development Agreement for the development of 168.77 acres with 269 single - family
lots (99.26 acres), park area (3.1 acres), Equestrian Park (2.7 acres), equestrian trail (0.44
acres), and drainage channel (1.77 acres). In addition, a related annexation encompassed a total
of 240 acres, including the development site plus adjacent parcels owned by Southern California
Edison and the San Bernardino County Flood Control District.
B. REQUEST: The project site, previously owned by Traigh Pacific, is now owned by the same
developer that owns the area just south of the project site (WSI Highland Investments, LLC).
P181
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TIME EXTENSION DRC201 5- 01 084 —WSI HIGHLAND INVESTMENTS, LLC
December 16, 2015
Page
On March 27, 2012, Traigh Pacific submitted a request to amend the terms of their
Development Agreement. Traigh Pacific could not perform on providing the required Equestrian
facilities as originally contemplated in the Development Agreement and the current developers
have been working with City staff to find solutions to fulfill this requirement. On November 19,
2014, Time Extension DRC2014 -00876 was approved by the City Council allowing a one (1)
year time extension of the related Development Agreement. Since the subject Development
Agreement is set to expire on January 18, 2016, staff has initiated a time extension application
for an additional one (1) year to provide additional time to properly negotiate this issue. Any
future amendments to the Development Agreement will be subject to a separate action. If the
time extension request is granted, the approval of the development agreement will expire on
January 18, 2017.
STATUS OF RELATED ENTITLEMENTS:
C. Planning Commission and Review Committees: The Planning Commission reviewed and
approved the residential development project on June 9, 2004. All of the review committees
(Grading, Technical, Design) analyzed the original project and recommended approval to the
Planning Commission. Committee conditions were subsequently incorporated into the
Resolution of Approval for the project. As the applicant does not propose any changes to the
project in conjunction with this time extension request for the Development Agreement, no
further actions by any of the Committees or Commission are necessary. The original
conditions of approval would continue to apply per Section 17.14.090 (C)(2).
D. Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14749: The associated tentative tract map is not included in this
time extension request. Tentative Tract Map 14749 was approved by the Planning
Commission on June 9, 2004. This approval was appealed to the City Council, the appeal was
denied and the project approved (second reading of Ordinances 729 [Specific Plan
Amendment] and 730 [Development Agreement] on August 4, 2004). A lawsuit was
subsequently filed on August 18, 2004, against the City over the approved project (Spirit of the
Sage Council v. City of Rancho Cucamonga, with the applicant (Traigh Pacific L.P) as the Real
Party of Interest). The case was settled on December 20, 2005, with the applicant agreeing to
pay a settlement to the petitioner and the original City approval remaining intact. The
settlement agreement became effective on February 10, 2006, with the lawsuit dismissed
7 days later on February 17, 2006.
The City's attorney informed staff that pursuant to Government Code Section 66452.6 (c), the
subject tentative tract map is entitled to an automatic time extension for the period between
the date the lawsuit was filed (August 18, 2004) and the date the lawsuit was settled (February
10, 2006), or 541 days. Tentative tract maps are approved for 3 years. The start date of the
3 -year approval period was the date of the second reading by the City Council for the Specific
Plan Amendment and the Development Agreement. With the Time Extension, and the lawsuit
taken into consideration, the official start date for SUBTT14749 was January 27, 2006, with
the 3 -year expiration date on January 27, 2009.
P182
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TIME EXTENSION DRC201 5 -01 084 — WSI HIGHLAND INVESTMENTS, LLC
December 16, 2015
Page 3
The tentative tract map was set to expire on January 27, 2009. A time extension for the tentative
tract map is not necessary at this time. The State legislature passed four bills: SB 1185, AB333
and AB208, and AB116, which automatically extended the duration of the approval period for all
tentative maps that were set to expire on or before January 1, 2011 (SB1185), on or before
January 1, 2012 (AB333) on or before January 1, 2014 (AB208), on or before July 13, 2013
(AB116). Furthermore, the applicant was granted an additional year with the approval of a Time
Extension request on June 8, 2011 (Resolution No. 11 -26). The duration of the combined time
extensions granted by all four State bills, as well as the one Time Extension approved, is 8 years.
Therefore, the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14749 is now set to expire 8 years after
January 27, 2009 which is on January 27, 2017.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City Council certified an Environmental Impact Report on
July 21, 2004 (State Clearing House #2003081085) in connection with the City's approval of
Annexation DRC2003- 10151, Tentative Tract SUBTT14749 and Development Agreement DRC2003-
00411.
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative
Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project
unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts
on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the
project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii)
new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously
considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different
mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts.
Staff has evaluated the Development Agreement Time Extension request and concludes that
substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred
and are not proposed which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the
previously certified EIR. In that the Time Extension is being requested in order to provide additional
time for the developer to work with the City to address requirements of the Development Agreement,
staff finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previously
certified EIR, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different
mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less -than-
significant. Therefore, pursuant to CEQA, staff recommends that the City Council concur with the
staff determination that no additional environmental review is required in connection with the City's
consideration of the Time Extension for Development Agreement (DRC2003- 00411).
CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within
a 660 -foot radius of the project site to properties to the north, south, east, and west.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TIME EXTENSION DRC2O15-01UD4—\8XS| HIGHLAND INVESTMENTS, LLC
December 1O.2O15
Page
Attachments: Exhibit A— Ordinance No. 73OA for Development Agreement (ORC2003-OO411)
Exhibit B— Approved Resolution No. 14-213 for Time Extension /ORC2U14-OU878\
Draft Resolution 0f Approval for Time Extension ORC|2O15'O1O84
ORDINANCE NO. 730A
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
DRC2003- 00411, A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND TRAIGH PACIFIC
FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEVELOPING AN APPROXIMATE
168.77 ACRE SITE WITH UP TO 269 RESIDENTIAL LOTS, FOR
PROPERTIES GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF THE
LOWER SCE CORRIDOR BETWEEN ETIWANDA AVENUE
AND EAST AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF, AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 730 —
APN: 0225 - 083 -05, 06, 07, 10, 22, 23, 25, AND 26 AND
0225- 084 -02.
A. RECITALS.
1. California Government Code Section 65864 provides, in pertinent part, as
follows:
"The Legislature finds and declares that:
A. The tack of certainty in the approval of development projects can result in
a waste of resources, escalate the cost of housing and other development
to the consumer, and discourage investment in and commitment to
comprehensive planning, which would make maximum efficient utilization
of resources at the least economic cost to the public.
B. Assurance to the applicant for a development project that upon approval
of the project, the applicant may proceed with the project in accordance
with existing policies, rules and regulations, and subject to conditions of
approval, will strengthen the public planning process, encourage private
participation in comprehensive planning, and reduce the economic costs
of development."
2. California Government Code Section 65865 provides, in pertinent part, as
follows:
3.
A
"A. Any city ... may enter into a development agreement with any person
having a legal or equitable interest in real property for the development of
the property as provided in this article..."
California Government Code Section 65865.2 provides, in part, as follows:
"A development agreement shall specify the duration of the agreement, the
permitted uses of the property, the density or intensity of use, the maximum
height and size of proposed buildings, and provisions for reservation or
dedication of land for public purposes. The development agreement may
include conditions, terms, restrictions, and requirements for subsequent
discretionary actions, provided that such conditions, terms, restrictions, and
requirements for discretionary actions shall not prevent development of the
land for the uses and to the density or intensity of development set forth in
the agreement..."
;.
P185
Ordinance No. 730A
Page 2 of 54
4. Attached to this Ordinance, marked as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by
this reference, is proposed Development Agreement DRC2003-0041 1,
concerning that property generally located north of the lower SCE Corridor
between Etiwanda Avenue and East Avenue, and legally described in the
attached Development Agreement. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the
Development Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "A" is referred to as the
"Development Agreement."
5. On June 9, 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga held a duly noticed public hearing concerning the Development
Agreement and concluded said hearing on that date and recommended
approval through adoption of its Resolution No, 04-80.
6. On July 21, 2004, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing regarding the Development
Agreement.
7. On July 21, 2004, the City Council introduced Ordinance No. 730 approving
the Development Agreement. On August 4, 2004, the City Council adopted
Ordinance No. 730.
8. On October 20, 2004, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to
consider the adoption of a new ordinance approving the Development
Agreement and repealing Ordinance No. 730.
9. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby find, determine, and ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth
in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
SECTION 2: Based upon the facts and information contained in the record of
this project, the City Council makes the following findings and
statements, and takes the following actions, pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") (Public Resources
Code Section 21000 et seq.):
A. Traigh Pacific (the "Applicant") seeks approval of a series of actions
related to the annexation of land from unincorporated San Bernardino
County into the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the approval of a General
Plan Amendment, Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment, Tentative
Tract Map SUBTT14749, and associated Developmert Agreement. The
actions also include the development 107.28 acres of the 168.77-acre site
with 269 single-family housing units (99.26 acres), park area (3.1 acres),
equestrian park (2.7 acres), equestrian trail (0.44 aces), and drainage
channel (1.77 acres). The development would have a gross density of
Ordinance No. 730A P186
Page 3 of 54
1.59 dwelling units per acre, and a net density of 2.5 dwelling units per
acre. The remaining 61.49 acres will continue to be used for flood control
purposes. The proposed annexation action encompasses a total of 240
acres and includes the development site plus adjacent parcels owned by
Southern California Edison and San Bernardino County Flood Control
District. These series of actions and approvals are hereinafter defined in
this Ordinance as the "Project."
B. The Applicant has submitted the following applications relating to the
Project: Annexation DRC2003-01051, General Plan Land Use
Amendment DRC2003-00410, Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment
DRC2003-00409, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT114749, and Development
Agreement DRC2003-00411 (collectively the "Project Applications").
These Project Applications, as well as the appeal of the Planning
Commission's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT14749, constitute
the matters involving the Project, which are submitted to the City Council
for decision and action.
C. The City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, prepared the
Draft Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for the Project, including
certain technical appendices (the "Appendices") to the Draft EIR (State
Clearinghouse No. 2003081085). The Draft EIR was circulated for a 45-
day public review and comment period from December 5, 2003 through
January 28, 2004, Comments were received during that period and
written responses were prepared and sent to all persons and entities
submitting comments. Those comments and the responses thereto have
been included in the Final EIR, as well as the revisions to the Draft EIR.
Those documents, together with the Draft EIR and Appendices, comprise
the Final EIR.
D. The City Council finds that the Final EIR was completed pursuant to
CEQA, and the State Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA, 14
California Code of Regulations, Section 15000, et seq. ("the Guidelines"),
By Resolution No. 04-240, the City Council has certified the Final EIR as
being in compliance with the requirements of CEQA.
E. The City Council finds that the Final EIR was presented to the City
Council and that the City Council reviewed and considered the
information in the Final EIR and has reached its own conclusions with
respect to the Project and as to whether and how to approve the various
components of the project approvals.
F. The City Council finds that the Final EIR represents the independent
judgment of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and
adequately addresses the impacts of the Project and imposes appropriate
mitigation measures for the Project.
P187
Ordinance No. 730A
Page 4 of 54
G.. Public Resources Code Section 21081 provides that no public agency
shall approve or carry out a project for which an environmental impact
report has been completed which identifies one or more significant
environmental effects unless the public agency makes one or more of the
following findings with respect to each significant effect:
i). Changes or alterations have been required in, er incorporated into
the project, which mitigate or avoid the significant environmental
effects thereof as identified in the completed environmental impact
report.
ii). Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and
jurisdiction of another public agency and such changes have been
adopted by such agency or can and should be adopted by such
other agency.
iii). Specific economic, social or other considerations make infeasible
the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the
environmental impact report.
H. The City Council finds, based upon the Final EIR, public comments,
public agency comments, and the entire record before it, that the Project
may create significant impacts in the areas of Earth Resources, Water
Resources, Transportation/Circulation, Air Quality, Biological Resources,
Hazards, Noise, Public Services, Utilities, Aesthetics, and Cultural
Resources. However, changes or alterations have been required in, or
incorporated into the Project, which will mitigate and in some cases, avoid
the significant impacts. The specific changes and alterations required,
and a brief explanation of the rationale for the findings with regard to each
impact, are contained in the "CEQA Findings" for the Project (Exhibit "F"
to the July 21, 2004 City Council Staff Report) and are incorporated
herein by reference. In addition to the rationale and explanation
contained in the "CEQA Findings the City Council makes the following
additional findings regarding the impacts of the Project on the resources
and services listed in this paragraph:
i). EARTH RESOURCES, The Final EIR finds that development of the
Project would expose people and structures to risks associated with
seismic ground shaking produced by numerous regional faults.
Additionally, development of the project would require removal of
vegetation to prepare for grading; this would create a short -term
increased potential for top soil erosion. Potential erosion in the
long -term would result from increased surface runoff rates due to
road paving and construction of impermeable structures. Mitigation
measures are imposed which require a detailed geologic and
geotechnical investigation for each lot prior to the grading of the
Project site. Specifically, the developer must: demonstrate that
each lot is buildable and complies with recommendations and
specifications found in the geotechnical investigation report included
in Appendix C of the Final EIR (Mitigation Measure 3 -1); identify
Ordinance No. 730A P188
Page 5 of 54
potential geologic and soil limitations and recommend appropriate
engineering and design measures to adequately protect structures
and inhabitants (Mitigation Measure 3 -2); and identify these
construction measures on applicable grading plans, and implement
them to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Further, mitigation
measures are imposed on the project that require preparation and
approval of a Dust Control Plan and a Landscape and Irrigation Plan
to reduce the likelihood of erosion (Mitigation Measures 3-4 and 3-
5). Based on these mitigation measures, and the additional ones
contained in the Final EIR, the City Council finds that the effects of
seismic shaking on persons and structures and the possibility of
erosion will be mitigated to a level of less than significant.
WATER RESOURCES. The Final EIR identifies that conversion of
the Project site to urban uses would increase the amount of
sediment, suspended debris, landscape maintenance or associated
chemicals (e.g., fertilizers, herbicides, etc.), and materials related to
automotive wear (e.g., tire rubber, oil, antifreeze, etc.) that would
reach the local drainage system due to run -off caused by grading or
by being washed off streets during storm events or street - sweeping
activities. Mitigation measures imposed on the applicant would
require the Project developer to apply for and receive a National
Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and, if
necessary, to obtain Clean Water Act Section 401 and 404 permits
(for water quality certification for dredge and fill operations);
additionally, the developer will be required to implement all
applicable Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent
construction of the Project from polluting surface and ground waters.
The City Council finds that implementation of this mitigation
measure will mitigate impacts on water quality to a level of less than
insignificant. Additionally, the Final EIR identifies that the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has identified the Project
site as within a flood zone designated "Flood Zone D." Mitigation
measures will require the developer to install a revetment along the
East Etiwanda Channel adjacent to the Project site, and implement
on- and off -site drainage system improvements outlined in the
Project Drainage Study (Appendix D of the draft EIR). The City
Council finds that the revetment and drainage improvements will
reduce flood impacts associated with the Project to a level of less
than significant.
III). TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION. The Final EIR indicates
that the proposed Project would increase vehicle trips and impact
the level of service along arterial streets and intersections;
specifically, the Project is anticipated to generate a total of 2,956
daily vehicle trips at build -out. Further, it is assumed that at build -
out 68% of the Project traffic would enter /exit the site along
Etiwanda Avenue, while 32% would use East Avenue; this
distribution would cause some roads to be more intensely affected
Ordinance No. 730A
Page 6 of 54
than others. Additionally, the Final EIR found that the level of
service at the intersection of Etiwanda and Highland Avenues could
be reduced to a "D" level during the morning peak hour at full build-
out. Mitigation Measures are imposed to require the developer to
contribute a fair share to the traffic signal mitigation program of the
County of San Bernardino and/or the City of Rancho Cucamonga to
help fund the construction of traffic signals at the intersections of:
Day Creek Boulevard/Banyan Avenue; Day Creek Boulevard/SR-
210 West-bound ramp', Day Creek Boulevard/SR 210 East-bound
ramp; Etiwanda Avenue/Banyan Avenue: Etiwanda Avenue/Wilson
Avenue; and East Avenue /Banyan Avenue. Further, the developer
will be required to pay a "fair share" contribution towards off -site
impacts to linked roadways and intersections as outlined in the
Project traffic report; this "fair share" amount is approximately
$63,818 as of the date of the traffic study. The City Council finds
that based on these mitigation measures, traffic at the study
intersections will be reduced to operate at a level of service of D or
better (with all but one intersection operating at level of service C or
better) and that the impacts of the Project on Traffic and Circulation
will be mitigated to a level of less than significant.
iv). AIR QUALITY. The Final EIR identifies that the Project may create
significant and unavoidable impacts on Air Quality. Specifically, the
Final EIR identifies that emissions from construction-related
activities are likely to exceed the threshold of significance specified
by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD).
These impacts are short-term and can cause nuisance impacts to
adjacent land uses in the local area by way of fugitive dust produced
by grading of the site. In addition, construction- related emissions,
particularly from architectural coatings (painting) and off-road diesel
equipment, are anticipated to produce significant levels of reactive
organic compounds (ROC) and nitrogen oxides (NO),) that would
exceed SCAQMD thresholds of significance and result in significant
short-term air pollution impacts. Comprehensive mitigation
measures (Mitigation Measures 6-1 - 6-10) are imposed on the
Project which will require various dust control measures, emission
control measures, and off-site actions. Included in those measures
are requirements to ensure that all construction equipment is
property serviced and maintained and that trucks are not left idling
for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes),
reestablishment of ground cover through seeding and watering,
phased grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to
erosion over extended periods of time, suspension of grading
operations during periods of high wind (i.e., wind speeds exceeding
25 mph), and regular washing and sweeping of the site. The Final
EIR also indicates that the Project would produce long-term impacts
on Air Quality as a result of the additional external vehicle trips that
will be generated, and their attendant production of NO, and PM10
in excess of SCAQMD standards. Further, secondary impact
potential would derive from energy consumption by on-site
residential heaters, stoves, water heaters, and similar consumptive
MEMO
E
Ordinance No. 730A P190
Page 7 of 54
appliances. Mitigation measures imposed on the Project to reduce
long-term impacts include requiring the developer to demonstrate
that all residential structures have incorporated high- efficiency /low-
polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters
(Mitigation Measure 6-11), and that all residential structures have
incorporated thermal pane windows and weather-stripping
(Mitigation Measure 6-12). Further, the developer will be required
to make a fair share contribution to a "park and ride" facility along
the 1-15 or 1-10 freeways, as well as construct a bus stop/shelter at
the trailhead park, if directed by OmniTrans. The City Council finds
that with the implementation of the recommended mitigation
measures directed at both short- and long-term impacts, emissions
will be reduced and the Project's contribution to regional emission of
criterial pollutants will be minimized. However, the City Council
finds that despite the imposition of all of these comprehensive
mitigation requirements, the Project will produce significant short-
and long-term impacts on Air Quality due to emissions, and that
these impacts will remain significant after mitigation.
V). BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. The Final EIR indicates that, prior to
the Grand Prix fire in October 2003, the Project site contained
approximately 109 acres of sage scrub (including white sage), along
with California buckwheat, California filago, valley lessingia, popcom
flower, and common phacelia; the Project will eliminate this
vegetation through development of the area. Further, the Project
will impact sensitive plant species present on the site (as
determined before the 2003 wildfire) including Plummer's mariposa
lily, Pious daisy, and four separate types of spineflowers (Ramona,
prostrate, California, and Parry's). Development of the site will also
impact wildlife corridors and will remove habitat that supports a
number of sensitive species that were either observed onsite or
have a moderate to high potential to occur onsite, including the
sharp-shinned hawk, Southern California rufous-crowned sparrow,
red-shouldered hawk, white-tailed kite, northern harrier, Cooper's
hawk, San Diego horned lizard, and orange-throated whiptail. The
Final EIR indicated that the California gnatcatcher (a federally listed
threatened species) has not been observed on-site and has a low
probability of occurring on the site due to the type of vegetation
present. Also, the Final EIR found that while a portion of the Project
site (the Etiwanda Creek channel) is within the historical range of
the endangered dangered San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (SBKR), since the
creek channel is not proposed for development, the Project will not
cause direct impacts to the SBKR. The Final EIR further found that
development of the site will remove 0.48 acres of land in four small
drainages that are under Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE)
jurisdiction, but that none of these areas is considered a wetland.
The Final EIR found that the Project is not consistent with the goals
of the North Etiwanda Open Space and Habitat Preservation
Program (NEOSHPP) since it does not include any on-site
preservation of open space lands. Mitigation measures have been
SCSI
Ordinance No. 730A
Page 8 of 54
imposed on the project to require the Project developer to acquire
and convey to the County approximately 164 acres of land as off -
site mitigation land. This 164 -acre area is intended to accomplish a
1:5 to 1 ratio to mitigate for the loss of the approximately 109 acres
of sage scrub and to mitigate the potential loss of habitat for
sensitive plants and animal species. The City finds that the
recommended mitigation measures will help reduce potentially
significant impacts regarding the loss of habitat, but that the impacts
will remain significant after mitigation.
A. HAZARDS. The Final EIR identifies that the Project would expose
people and structures to potential hazards due to the possibility of
hazardous materials spills on nearby state highways, and due to the
minor use of chemicals and other materials typical of suburban
uses. Additionally, the Project would expose more people and
structures to potential wildfire hazards, and would expose more
people to potentially dangerous wildlife /human encounters.
Mitigation measures imposed will require submission of a plan
detailing proper clean -up efforts for any hazardous or toxic
substance that is discovered or released during construction
(Mitigation Measure 9-1); development of fuel modification zones,
and the requirement of "firewise" landscaping and the use of fire-
resistant building materials to reduce fire hazards (Mitigation
Measures 9 -2 - 9-4); and the posting of signs warning of the
potential risk of wildlife /human interactions on the site (Mitigation
Measure 9 -8). The City Council finds that after implementation of
these measures, potentially significant impacts relating to Hazards
will be reduced to a level of less than significant.
vii). NOISE. The Final EIR identifies the likelihood of short -term impacts
on ambient noise levels during construction of the Project. The
primary source of construction noise is heavy equipment associated
with construction activities; earth - moving equipment is anticipated to
create noise up to 90-dB. A mitigation measure has been imposed
that will require the construction contractors to adhere to the City's
Development Code for hours of construction activity — 6:30 a.m, to
8:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday, with no construction to take
place on Sundays or holidays (Mitigation Measure 10 -2). Based on
this mitigation measure, the City Council finds that the short term
noise impacts from the Project will be reduced to less than
significant levels. The Final EIR also identified that noise levels
would increase in the long -term due to additional motor vehicle
noise and from general human activity. In the opening year (2005),
noise levels at fifty feet from the centerline of area roadways would
range from a low of 58.1 CNEL along Wilson Avenue east of
Etiwanda Avenue to a high of 78.3 CNEL along Highland Avenue
east of Etiwanda Avenue. A mitigation measure will be imposed to
require the developer to document that exterior residential areas will
have exterior noise levels of less than 65 dB CNEL (Mitigation
Measure 10 -5), and that interior living area noise levels are less
Ordinance No. 730A P192
Page 9 of 54
than 45 dB CNEL (Mitigation Measure 10 -6). Further, the developer
will be required to incorporate site designs and measures to help
reduce proposed noise levels over the long -term. The City Council
finds that based on these mitigation measures, the potential noise
impacts of the Project on current and future residents will be
mitigated to a level of less than significant.
viii). PUBLIC SERVICES. The Final EIR identifies that due to population
increases associated with the Project, the proposed Project would
incrementally increase the need for public services in the areas of
fire protection, police protection, schools, libraries, medical services,
and roads. A mitigation measure is imposed to require the
developer to pay all legally established public service fees, including
police, fire, schools, parks, and library fees (Mitigation Measure 11-
1). Additionally, in order to reduce the number of fire incidents
requiring response by the City's Fire Department, the project
developer would be required to obtain approval from the Fire
Department with regard to adequate fire flow and installation of
acceptable fire- resistant structural materials in project buildings
(Mitigation Measure 11 -3). Additionally, the developer will be
required to post a bond in an amount sufficient to ensure installation
and maintenance of public and private roads, and drainage facilities
necessary for each phase of the project (Mitigation Measure 11 -5).
The City Council finds that the imposition and implementation of
these mitigation measures will mitigate the Project's impacts on
Public Services to a level of less than significant.
ix). UTILITIES The Final EIR identifies that the Project would create
potentially significant impacts as a result of new residential water
requirements of approximately 602,819 gallons of water per day;
this water would be provided from an existing two million gallon
water reservoir via an existing water main, however, as growth
continues in the Project area, additional offsite water storage
facilities would be required. Further, the Final EIR indicates that
based on an estimate of 270 gallons of wastewater per unit per day
being produced, the Project would require construction of a sewer
main to transport the wastewater to an existing sewage treatment
plant. Additionally, the Project would generate the need for
increased electricity, natural gas, and telephone and television
cables, and would increase the amount of solid waste produced. A
mitigation measure imposed requires the contribution of funds for
sewer service (Mitigation Measure 12 -1). Further mitigation
measures require submission of development plans to Southern
California Edison, the Gas Company, and Verizon in order to
facilitate engineering design and construction of improvements
necessary to provide electrical, natural gas, and telephone service
to the Project; these companies must also provide "will -serve" letters
in order for building permits to issue. The City Council finds that
imposition of these mitigation measures will reduce the impacts of
the Project on Utilities to a level of less than significant.
Ordinance No. 730A
Page 10 of 54
x). AESTHETICS. The Final EIR identifies that the Project may create
significant and unavoidable impacts on Aesthetics. In the short -
term, the landscape would be altered by grading and clearing, and
views of the Project site would include the heavy construction
equipment and machinery used to prepare the Project site for
construction of new homes. Long -term impacts would occur due to
a fundamental change in the visual and aesthetic character of the
area, and would transform the existing natural terrain into a
developed and planned community. Additionally, the presence of
homes would mean more lighting at night, as well as increased
glare due to additional windows in the community. Mitigation
measures will require that outdoor lighting comply with the
requirements of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan design guidelines
and the City's General Plan (Mitigation Measure 13 -1), and that a
detailed landscaping and wall treatment plan be prepared
(Mitigation Measure 13 -5). Even with the imposition and
implementation of these and other mitigation measures, the City
Council finds that the impact of the Project on Aesthetics will remain
significant after mitigation.
xi). CULTURAL RESOURCES. The Final EIR identifies that while the
existence of paleontological resources is unlikely on the Project site,
such resources may be discovered during construction of the
Project. Also, one historic archeological site was previously
recorded on the property, CA -SBR -3131 H. This prior survey found
what appeared to be the remains of a construction camp used by
the Etiwanda Water Company in the 1880s; the structure consisted
of rock walls, hand - forged metal barrel hoops and nails, barbed
wire, and glass fragments. Mitigation measures imposed require
that a qualified paleontologist conduct a preconstruction field survey
of the Project site and submit a report of findings and specific
recommendations for further mitigation measures (Mitigation
Measure 14 -1). Should any prehistoric archaeological resources be
found before or during grading, a qualified archaeologist would be
retained to monitor construction activities, and take appropriate
measures to protect or preserve the resources. The City Council
finds that with the implementation of these mitigation measures, the
Project will have a less than significant impact on paleontological,
archaeological, and historical resources.
xii). CUMULATIVE IMPACTS — AIR QUALITY BIOLOGICAL
RESOURCES, AND AESTHETICS The Final EIR provides that this
Project, together with the construction of other development projects
in the vicinity, would create cumulative short-term impacts to air
quality during construction. This Project would also create a
significant cumulative impact to regional air quality due to additional
vehicle emissions adding incremental pollutants within the South
Coast Air Basin. With respect to biological resources, the Final EIR
concluded that the Project would contribute to cumulatively
considerable biological impacts with loss of habitat and restriction of
P193
Ordinance No. 730A
Page 11 of 54
wildlife movement in the fan area due to encroachment of human
structures and activities. With respect to aesthetics, the proposed
project will contribute incrementally to cumulatively considerable
aesthetic impacts related to the visual character of the area going
from largely vacant, rural terrain to low density suburban
development.
I. The City Council finds, based on the Final EIR, that after implementation
of the proposed mitigation measures, the following impacts associated
with the proposed Project would remain significant: air quality (short -term
impacts, and short and long -term cumulative impacts), biological
resources related to the loss of habitat, and aesthetics related to short-
term views (i.e. construction activities and dust) and long -term views
related to transforming the existing natural terrain into a residential
community.
J. The Final EIR describes a range of alternatives to the Project that might
fulfill basic objectives of the Project. These alternatives include the
required "No Project -No Development" alternative, and the "Rural Density
Alterative," development under the existing land use designation. Other
alternatives that were considered and rejected included the alternative
location alternative and the alternative land use alternative. As set forth
below, the alternatives identified in the Final EIR are not feasible because
they would not achieve the basic objectives of the Project or would do so
only to a much smaller degree and, therefore, leave unaddressed the
significant economic, infrastructure, and General Plan goals that the
Project is intended to accomplish, and are thus infeasible due to social
and economic considerations, and /or they are infeasible because they
would not eliminate the adverse environmental impacts of the proposed
Project. Accordingly, each of the alternatives is infeasible. to making this
finding, the City Council determines as follows:
Q The objectives of the Project are:
a To be consistent with, and implement, the established policies
and goals of the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan,
Etiwanda North Specific Plan, City Development Code, and all
other City development guidelines;
b. Annexation of approximately 240 acres including the 16$.77 -
acre Project site and adjacent utility easements and corridors
into the City of Rancho Cucamonga;
c. To Integrate the Project with the character of the surrounding
neighborhoods and establish a development that results in
logical, coordinated growth;
'Ji1106ZI
Ordinance No. 730A
Page 12 of 54
d. To establish a Project -wide circulation system that meets
regional and local transportation needs and accommodates both
vehicles and pedestrians;
e. To provide a system of public/community facilities, including
trails, open space areas, and landscaping to support the
residents of the Project and surrounding area in an efficient and
timely manner;
f. To provide backbone public infrastructure (i.e., roads, utilities)
to serve Project residents and the surrounding community;
g. To minimize impacts to, and generate revenues in excess of
costs for various public service agencies; and
h. To provide quality housing opportunities compatible with
existing and planned development that responds to market
demands.
ii) Under the "No Project -No Development Alternative" the project site
would remain vacant which would avoid all significant project
specific impacts, although cumulative impacts including traffic,
noise, and air quality would eventually occur, but not to the same
degree as if the proposed Project were built. This alternative would
eliminate essentially all of the adverse impacts of the proposed
Project and is, therefore, an environmentally superior alternative.
This alternative does not meet the Project's basic objectives of
developing a residential project consistent with the General Plan
land use designation for the site.
iii) Under the "No Project — Open Space Alternative" the site would
remain vacant but be acquired, fenced, and maintained for open
space and biological habitat as part of the NEOSHPP plan. This
alternative would avoid all the significant impacts of developing the
property, however, cumulative impacts including traffic, noise, and
air quality, will eventually occur regardless of whether the site is
developed or preserved, although perhaps not to the same degree
as with the proposed Project. This is an environmentally superior
alternative but does not meet the Project's basic objectives, and
indeed all other objectives, of developing a project consistent with
the General Plan land use designation for the site.
Iv) Under the "Reduced Intensity Alternative" almost all of the
significant or potentially significant impacts associated with the
proposed project would be eliminated. The remaining significant
impact (i.e., construction emissions) could probably not be
eliminated or significantly reduced by the implementation of any
feasible alternative or mitigation measures at this time, unless the
project were to support all custom lots of one acre or more where
only building pads are graded when needed. However, the Project
s1106M
Ordinance No. 730A P196
Pagel3 of 54
fiscal report indicates that fewer, larger residential lots /units would
not generate sufficient public revenues to offset costs to provide
services. While this alternative is environmentally superior to the
proposed Project, it does not meet the Project's economic
objectives of developing a residential project that has a positive
cost/benefit ratio for the City and generates a reasonable return on
investment. Also, since this alternative does not fully implement the
City's goal of providing adequate park facilities for City residents
v) The "Modified Site Plan Alternative" would create a 300 -foot wide
buffer along the west bank of the East Etiwanda Creek to better
buffer wildlife movement and create more open space. It would
cluster the residential development in the southwestern portion of
the site and would have 200 units with a minimum lot size of 6,000
square feet and a height limit of one story. It would eliminate the
significant impacts of the proposed project - related long -term air
quality (NOx and ROG emissions). However, potentially significant
impacts related to short-term air pollutant emissions (ROG) and loss
of biological resources would remain. Also, this alternative does not
meet the Project's economic objectives of developing a residential
project that has a positive cost/benefit ratio for the City and
generates a reasonable return on investment. This alternative is
marginally superior to the proposed Project in terms of
environmental impacts, but it does not meet the Project objectives.
vi) The "Rural Density Alterative" would development the site under the
City's currently designated of Very Low density residential (VL)
which allows a maximum of 2 units per acre of developable land
with minimum 20,000 square foot lots. This alternative would
locate approximately 75 units on 37 acres in the southern portion of
the site, while the remaining 70 acres would be set aside as open
space and biological habitat. This alternative would eliminate the
significant impacts of the proposed Project related to biological
resources related to loss of alluvial fan habitat and long -term air
quality from NOx and ROG emissions. This alternative still has
significant impacts related to short-term air pollutant emissions
(ROG) and does not provide the benefits of two parks. Also, this
alternative does not meet the Project's economic objectives of
developing a residential project that has a positive cost/benefit ratio
for the City and generates a reasonable return on investment. As
such, it does not meet the Project's goals. This alternative is
environmentally superior to the proposed Project, but it does not
meet the Project objectives
K. Mitigation measures described in the Mitigation Monitoring Program will
avoid or substantially lessen the potentially significant environmental
effects of the Project, Further, the environmental, physical, social,
economic and other benefits of the Project, as set forth in this section and
in the "CEQA Findings" for the Project (Exhibit "F" to the July 21, 2004
City Council Staff Report), which is incorporated herein by this reference,
'Ji111'Y7
Ordinance No. 730A
Page14 of 54
outweigh any unavoidable, significant, adverse impacts that may occur as
a result of the Project, including short-term impacts on air quality from
construction - related emissions and cumulative impacts to air quality
related to vehicle emissions; impacts to biological resources related to
removal of habitat; and short-term impacts to aesthetics (i.e. construction
dust obscuring views) and long -term impacts to aesthetics (changes to
the natural terrain). Therefore, due to overriding benefits of the Project
and because the alternatives identified in the Final EIR are not feasible,
as discussed in paragraph j above, the City Council hereby finds that any
unavoidable impacts of the Project, including the mitigated but
unavoidable impacts to short -term and long -term impacts on air quality
and aesthetics, and project related and cumulative impacts to biological
resources, are acceptable based on the findings contained herein and in
the "CEQA Findings" for the Project. This determination shall constitute a
statement of overriding considerations within the meaning of CEQA and is
based on any one of the following environmental and other benefits of the
Project identified in the Final EIR and the record of the City Council's
proceedings:
i) Provision for the use of land consistent with the established policies
and goals of the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan,
Etiwanda North Specific Plan, City Development Code, and all other
City Development guidelines;
if) Annexation of approximately 240 acres including the 168.77 -acre
Project site and adjacent utility easements and corridors into the
City of Rancho Cucamonga;
iii) Integration of the Project with the character of the surrounding
neighborhoods and establishment of a development that results in
logical, coordinated growth;
iv) Establishment of a Project -wide circulation system that meets
regional and local transportation needs and accommodates both
vehicles and pedestrians;
v) Provision of a system of public/community facilities, including trails,
open space areas, and landscaping to support the residents of the
Project and surrounding area in an efficient and timely manner;
vi) Provision of backbone public infrastructure (i.e., roads, utilities) to
serve Project residents and the surrounding community;
vii) Minimization of impacts to, and generation of revenues in excess of
costs for, various public service agencies; and
viii) Provision of quality housing opportunities compatible with existing
and planned development that responds to market demands.
Ordinance No. 730A P198
Pagel 5 of 54
ix) The addition of housing units in accomplishment of the City's
Housing Element Goals and fulfillment of regional housing needs.
x) City control over the developing lands on the City's perimeter.
xi) Advancement of the regional trail system by the links to be
completed by the Project.
L. The mitigation measures in the Final EIR that correspond to the
environmental impacts which may result from the Project are hereby
adopted and made a condition of approval of, or incorporated into, the
Project. The City Council also hereby adopts the "Mitigation Monitoring
Plan" attached as Exhibit "H" to the July 21, 2004 City Council Staff
Report for this Project. The Mitigation Monitoring Plan will be used to
monitor compliance with the mitigation measures and conditions that
have been adopted or made a condition of Project approval as set forth in
this Section of this Ordinance and in the Mitigation Monitoring Plan.
M. Pursuant to provisions of the California Public Resources Code Section
21089(b), the findings contained in this Ordinance shall not be operative,
vested or final until all required filing fees assessed pursuant to California
Fish and Game Code Section 711.4, together with any required handling
charges, are paid to the County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino.
SECTION 3: The City Council finds that the Development Agreement does
comply with the requirements of California Government Code
Sections 65865 through 65869.5 in that the Development
Agreement does specify in detail and contains the following:
A. Provisions are included in Section 3(A) of the Development Agreement
requiring periodic review of the Agreement at least every twelve months,
at which time the applicant shall be required to demonstrate good faith
compliance with the terms of the Agreement (California Government
Code Section 65865.1).
B. The duration of the Development Agreement is specified in Section l(B)
of the Agreement as being for ten (10) years (Government Code Section
65865.2).
C. The permitted uses of the property, the density and intensity of use, the
maximum height and size of the proposed structures, and other required
provisions are referred to in Section 2(A) of the Development Agreement
(Government Code Section 65865.2).
D. The Development Agreement includes conditions, terms, restrictions and
requirements for subsequent discretionary actions in Section 2(B) of the
Agreement (Government Code Section 65865.2).
Ordinance No. 730A
Page16 of 54
E. The Development Agreement includes terms and conditions in Section 2
that require the developer to improve portions of public streets around the
perimeter of the property and provide for and improve streets inside the
development (Government Code Section 65865.2).
F. The Development Agreement specifies that the Project is to be
constructed in coordination with the construction of certain public
infrastructure improvements as specified in Section 2 of the Agreement.
(Government Code Section 65865.2).
SECTION 4. Based upon substantial evidence presented during the above-
referenced public hearings on July 21, 2004 and October 20,
2004, including written and oral staff reports, together with public
testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds that upon the
adoption of General Plan Amendment DRC2003-00410, the
Development Agreement will provide for development which is
consistent with the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan- The City
Council bases its findings of consistency with the General Plan on
the fact that the project entitlements specified in the Development
Agreement provide for the extension of the low density image of
Old Etiwanda into the area as provided in General Plan Policy
2.4.4.5, the fact that the proposed uses set forth in this
Development Agreement are compatible with the character of
existing development in the vicinity, and that the Development
Agreement is consistent with the General Plan's intent to keep
substantial portions of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan area as
open space.
SECTION 5: Based on substantial evidence presented during the above-
referenced public hearings on July 21, 2004 and October 20,
2004, including written and oral staff reports, together with public
testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds that upon the
adoption of Etiwanda North Specific Plan Ameridment DRC2003-
00409, the Development Agreement will provide for development
which is consistent with the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. The
City Council bases its findings of consistency with the Etiwanda
North Specific Plan on the facts that the proposed Project will
contain relatively large minimum residential lot sizes (minimum
size of 8,400 square feet and an average lot size of 11,600 square
feet), which are larger lots than in many other portions of the City
and consistent with the goals of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan
to provide for larger lots and equestrian lots. In addition,
development of lots less than 20,000 square feet will require the
developer to contribute an in-lieu fee of $1,000 per lot for the
development of an Equestrian Center. The Project is also
designed to contain a trails system, provide for views of the
a Leif]
P200
Ordinance No. 730A
Pagel7 of 54
mountains, and with the imposition of Mitigation Measure 1 -1, will
comply with the Specific Plan's requirements for landscape
treatments and required walls, fencing, fighting and community
entry that is consistent with the design scheme specified in the
Etiwanda North Specific Plan.
SECTION 6. Ordinance No. 730 is hereby repealed.
SECTION 7. This Council hereby approves Development Agreement
DRC2003- 00411, attached hereto as Exhibit "A," subject to the
condition that the Development Agreement shall not become
effective unless and until General Plan Amendment DRC2003-
00410 and the Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment
DRC2003 -00409 have been reviewed and approved by the City
Council and have taken effect.
SECTION 8: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall
cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage
at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of
general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and
circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Upon the
effective date of this Ordinance and satisfaction of the provisions
contained in Section 6 of this Ordinance, the Mayor shall execute
the Development Agreement on behalf of the City and the City
Clerk shall cause the Agreement to be recorded in the offices of
the County Recorder for the County of San Bernardin
Please see the following pages
for formal adoption, certification and signatures
Ordinance No. 730A P201
Page18 of 54
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of November 2004.
AYES: Alexander, Gutierrez, Howdyshell, Kurth, Williams
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAINED: Ni
ATTEST:
4&aC9����
Debra J. Ada ,C M C,C i t y C �Ie r k
1, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a Regular Meeting
of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 16"' day of June 2004, and was
passed at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the
3`d day November of 2004.
Executed this 4th day of November of 2004, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
//," - mo
AM C, City Clerk
P202
Ordinance No. 730A
Pagel9 of 54
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2003 -00411
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AND TRAfGH PACIFIC PROPERTIES (dba TRACY DEVELOPMENT) CONCERNING
THE PROPOSED TENTATIVE TRACT 14749
This Agreement (the "Development Agreement ") is made and entered into this 21st day
of July, 2004, by and between Traigh Pacific Prnnartin.c ighn r nn.,
and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation (the "CITY") pursuant to ,
the authority of Section 65864 through 65869.5 of the California Government Code.
Traigh Pacific Properties Parkwest Landscape and San Bemardino Flood Control
Drstncf, and its successors and assigns, if any, are referred to collectively hereinafter as
the "Property Owner". The CITY and Traigh Pacific Properties et at are collectively
referred to herein as the "Parties ".
RECITALS:
A. To provide more certainty in the approval of development projects, to
encourage private participation in comprehensive planning, and to reduce the economic
risk of development, the Legislature of the State of California has adopted Sections
65864, et seq. of the California Government Code, thus authorizing the CITY to enter
into binding development agreements with persons having legal or equitable interests in
real property, in order to establish development rights with respect thereto.
B. Section 65865(b) of the California Government Code authorizes the CITY
to enter into a binding development agreement with respect to real property which is in
unincorporated territory but also within the CITY's sphere of influence, provided that the
effectiveness of the development agreement is conditioned upon the annexation of such
real property to the CITY within the period of time for annexation as specified in the
Development Agreement.
C. Property Owner owns fee title to approximately 168.8 -acres of real
property located entirely within the County of San Bernardino (the "County ") and more
particularly described in Exhibit "A" and depicted on Exhibit "B" attached hereto (the
"Project Site ").
D. On April 24, 2003 the City received an application for Tentative Tract Map
(SUBT714749), a General Plan Amendment (ORC2003- 00410), an Etiwanda North
Specific Plan Amendment (DRC2003- 00409), along with this Development Agreement
(DRC2003- 00411) and a request for Annexation (DRC2003- 01051) of the Proposed
Project. An Environmental Impact Report has been prepared to address the potential
environmental impacts of the proposed project and all discretionary actions anticipated
by the CITY and the Local Agency Formation Commission.
E. As set forth in Ordinance No. 730A adopted by the City Council on
(the "Enacting Ordinance "), the execution of this Development Agreement and
performance of and compliance with the terms and conditions set forth herein by the
Development Agreement Traigh Pacific Properties
P203
Ordinance No. 730A
Page 20 of 54
Parties hereto: (i) is in the best interest of the CITY; (ii) will promote the public
convenience, general welfare, and good land use practices in the CITY; (iii) wit promote
preservation of land values; (iv) will encourage the development of the Project by
providing a level of certainty to the Property Owner; and (v) will provide fix orderly
growth and development of the CITY consistent with the CITY's General Plan.
AGREEMENT:
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals, and the mutual promises
and covenants of the Parties, and for other good and valuable consideration, tie receipt
and sufficiency of which us hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
Section 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS
A. Effectiveness of Devetopment Agreement
Notwithstanding the effective date of the Enacting Ordinance, this Development
Agreement shall only become effective, and the rights and obligations of the Parties
shall only arise, upon the date that the fast of the following have occurred:
1. The project site has been annexed to the CITY and said annexation is
final as to any and all administrative actions, and is not subject to judicial challenge; and
2. The Project and the Final EIR have been approved by the CITY and all
entitlements have been issued for completion by Property Owner.
The term of this Development Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date
and shall extend for a period of Ten (10) years thereafter, unless this Development
Agreement is terminated, modified or extended by circumstances set forth in this
Development Agreement, including, without limitation, the extensions provided below
and any extensions attributable to "force majeure" circumstances described in Section
2. DA. hereof or by mutual written consent of the Parties.
Following the expiration of the Term, this Development Agreement shall be
deemed terminated and of no further force and effect; provided, however, that such
termination shall not affect any right or duty arising from the project entitlements granted
prior to, concurrently with, or subsequent to, the approval of this Development
Agreement and the structures that are developed in accordance with this Development
Agreement and the use of those structures shall continue to be governed by this
Development Agreement for purposes of ensuring, for land use purposes, that those
structures continue to be legal conforming structures and that those uses continue to be
legal conforming uses.
C. AML nment
Subject to the terms of this Development Agreement, Property Owner shall have
the right to convey, assign, sell, lease, sublease, encumber, hypothecate or otherwise
transfer (for purposes of this Development Agreement, "Transfer") the Project Site, in
whole or in part, to any person, partnership, joint venture, firm or corporation or other
Development Agreement Traigh Pacific Properties
P204
Ordinance No. 730A
Page 21 of 54
entity at any time during the term of this Development Agreement, and to the extent of
each such Transfer, the transferor shall be relieved of its legal duty to perform such
obligations under this Development Agreement at the time of the Transfer, except to the
extent Property Owner is in default, as defined in Section 3.C, hereof, of any of the terms
of this Development Agreement when the Transfer occurs.
If all or a portion of the Project Site is Transferred and there is noncompliance by
the transferee owner with respect to any term and condition of this Development
Agreement, or by the transferor with respect to any portion of the Project Site not sold or
Transferred, such noncompliance shall be deemed a breach of this Agreement by that
transferee or transferor, as applicable, but shall not be deemed to be a breach
hereunder against other persons then owning or holding any interest in any portion of
the Project Site and not themselves in breach under this Development Agreement. Any
alleged breach shall be governed by the provisions of Section 3.C. hereof.
In no event shall the reservation or dedication of a portion of the Project Site to a
public agency cause a transfer of duties and obligations unless specifically stated to be
the case in this Development Agreement, any of the exhibits attached to this
Development Agreement, the instrument of conveyance used for such reservation or
dedication, or other form of agreement with such public agency.
Concurrently, with any such sale, transfer or assignment, or within ten business
days thereafter, the Property Owner shall notify the CITY, in writing, of such sale,
transfer or assignment and shall provide the CITY with an executed agreement, in a
form reasonably acceptable to the CITY, by the purchaser, transferee or assignee and
providing therein that the purchaser, transferee or assignee expressly and
unconditionally assumes all the duties and obligations of the Property Owner under this
agreement.
D. Amendment of Agreement
This Development Agreement may be amended from time to time by mutual
consent of the Parties in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Sections
65867 and 65868. Notwithstanding anything stated to the contrary in this Development
Agreement, the parties may enter into one or more implementing agreements, as set
forth below, to clarify the intended application or interpretation of this Development
Agreement, without amending this Development Agreement.
Property Owner and the CITY acknowledge that the provisions of this
Development Agreement require a close degree of cooperation between Property Owner
and the CITY and that, in the course of the development of the Project Site, it may be
necessary to supplement this Development Agreement to address the details of the
Parties' respective performance and obligations, and to otherwise effectuate the
purposes of this Development Agreement and the intent of the Parties. If and when,
from time to time, the Parties find that it is necessary or appropriate to clarify the
application or interpretation of this Development Agreement, the Parties may do so
through one or more implementing agreements (the "Implementing Agreement"), which
shall be executed by the City Planner and by an authorized representative of Property
Owner. After execution, each Implementing Agreement shall be attached as an
addendum and become a part of this Development Agreement, and may be further
changed or supplemented from time to time as necessary. Such Implementing
Development Agreement Traigh Pacific Properties
3
WRRIN
Ordinance No. 730A
Page 22 of 54
Agreement shalt not require the approval of the City Council of the CITY and shall only
be executed by the City Planner (on Behalf of the CITY), if the City Planner has made a
reasonable determination that such implementing agreements are not materially
inconsistent with this Development Agreement, and applicable ordinances, rules,
regulations and official policies of the CITY in effect at the time of execution of this
Development Agreement. Any changes to this Development Agreement which would
impose additional obligations on the CITY beyond those which would be teemed to
arise under a reasonable interpretation of this Development Agreement, or which would
purport to change land use designations applicable to the Project Site under the
applicable Project Entitlements, shall be considered "material" and shall require
amendment of this Agreement in accordance with the provisions of California
Government Code Sections 65867 and 65868.
Section 2. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT
A. Land Use and Project Entitlements
The Project Entitlements are depicted on the Tentative Tract Map, Conceptual
Grading Plan, and Conceptual Landscape Plan, attached hereto as Exhibits 1A — 1C.
Project Entitlements refers to the following material related to the approval of the
Development Agreement (DRC2003- 00411) and the Tentative Tract Map
(SUBTT14749): all plans that constitute the approved project, all Planning Commission
and City Council Resolutions of Approval including the associated conditions of
approval, and all mitigation measures included in the Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Plan and the Environmental Impact Report. The Parties acknowledge that,
without being obligated to do so, Property Owner plans to develop the Project Site in
substantial conformity with the Project Entitlements as approved by this Development
Agreement. During the Term of this agreement, the permitted uses for the Project, or
any portion thereof, the density and intensity of use, zoning, maximum height and size of
proposed buildings, building and yard setback requirements, provisions for the
reservation or dedication of land, design and performance standards and other terms
and conditions of development of the Project constitute the Entitlements as approved by
this Development Agreement. The specific terms of this Development Agreement shall
supercede and be controlling over any conflict and /or inconsistency with the Project
Entitlements.
The Parties acknowledge and agree that the total number of lots in the approved
tract totals 269 lots, and that lots may be shifted between phased tracts without
increasing the overall number of lots and be in substantial conformity with file Project
Entitlements as approved by this Development Agreement. The CITY Planner shall
exercise his reasonable discretion to review transfers of lots between tracts and make
the determination of substantial compliance.
Other certain specific modifications of the Project Entitlements to which the
Parties agree are set forth below. All Exhibits attached hereto constitute material
provisions of the Development Agreement, and are incorporated herein.
B. Rules and Regulations
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65856 and except as otherwise
explicitly provided in this Development Agreement, (1) the ordinance, rules and
Development Agreement Traigh Pacific Properties
Ordinance No. 730A P206
Page 23 of 54
regulations and official policies governing permitted uses of the Project Site, the density
and intensity of such uses, and the design, improvement, and construction standards
and specifications applicable to development of the Project and in effect as of the date of
this Development Agreement, and (2) and those ordinances of the CITY, as
implemented by this Development Agreement, rules, regulations and official policies in
effect as of the date of this Development Agreement, but only to the extent that they are
consistent with the Project Entitlements, as modified and /or amended by this
Development Agreement (collectively the "Existing Laws "), except that the CITY's street
improvement, lighting, storm drain, and the Americans with Disabilities Act ( "ADA ")
standards shall be followed, and the landscape standards applicable shall be those
specified in this Development Agreement or if none are so specified, the CiTY's
Standards. in the event of any conflict between the Existing Laws and the other CITY
ordinances, rules, regulations and official policies, then the Existing Laws shall control.
The CITY shall not be prevented in subsequent actions applicable to the Project, from
applying new ordinances, rules, regulations, and policies in effect ( "Future Policies ") to
the extent that they do not conflict with the Existing Laws. Such conflict shall be deemed
to occur if, without limitation, such Future Policies:
t. Modify the permitted types of land uses, the density or intensity of use,
the maximum height or size of proposed buildings on the property, building and yard
setback requirements, or impose requirements for the construction or provisions of on-
site or offsite improvements or the reservation or dedication of land for public use, or the
payment of fees or the imposition of extractions, other than as are in each case
specifically provided for in this Development Agreement
2. Prevent the Property Owner from obtaining all necessary approvals,
permits, certificates of other entitlements at such dates and under such circumstances
as the Property Owner would otherwise be entitled under this Development Agreement;
3. Render any conforming use of the Project Site a non - conforming use or
any structure on the Project Site a non - conforming structure.
C. Design and Infrastructure Issues
Gated Community
The Proposed Project is approved as a private gated community, which
shalt include formation of a Homeowners Association, The Homeowners Association
must be formed to assume responsibility and maintenance of the gates, common area
streets, drainage facilities, interim detention basins, utility easements, streetlights,
sidewalks, landscaping (including the north side of 'Lower Crest Collector) and walls
throughout the project. The terms and conditions of the CC &Rs establishing the
Homeowners Association shall be subject to City approval prior to recordation.
2. Homeowners Association and Private In -tract Slopes
In-tract streetscape plans depicting slopes on the Homeowners
Association and private slopes shall be reviewed and approved by CITY. Slopes of a
ratio 2H:1 V may be permitted up to 30-feet in height upon review and approval of the
City Planner with retaining walls as approved by the City Planner. Proposed specific
slope treatments, which shall be applied are depicted on Exhibit 2.
Development Agreement Traigh Pacific Properties
MIDI
Ordinance No. 730A
Page 24 of 34
Dray Utilities
The Project Entitlements do not require that Burd vaults be installed and
the CITY and Property Owner agree that no Burd vaults will be required throughout the
Project Site.
4. Community Trail
The Property Owner shall design and construct improvements to the
CITY Community Trail network along the Etiwanda Creek levee, and parallel to the
northerly extension of Etiwanda Avenue along the west project boundary, in accordance
with CITY Standards.
5. Grading
The Grading Plan, included in the Project Entitlements, shall conform to
the Design Guidelines of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. However, with an average
slope across the site less than 8 %, the Project is exempt from the CITY Hillside
Development Regulations of the Development Code.
Street Sections
The CITY desires that the design of East Avenue, Etiwanda Avenue and
"Lower Crest Collector," be designed as depicted in the Etiwanda forth Specific Plan
Exhibit 13(D) with community trail, and Exhibit 13(E), respectively.
The following deviations from the standard CITY Engineering Division
street standards or policies are acceptable as depicted on the approved plans included
as part of the Project Entitlements:
a. The straight sections on interior streets (Street W) may be greater
than 800 -feet due to the fact that the project is a private gated community, thereby
limiting the project from traffic impacts from any other development through the project.
b. All interior streets that have driveway access to single - family
residential lots may be designed with a 50 -foot right -of -way utilizing a rolled curb; all
other streets within the tract shall have a 60-foot right -of —way with a City standard 6 -inch
curb face.
Circulation Issues and Fees
a. Transportation Fee/Traffic Impact Analysis
The Property Owner shall construct all circulation improvements
necessary to serve the area in and around the Project Site, as generally depicted on
Exhibits 3A — 6A. In addition, the Property Owner shall comply with Transportation
Development Fees in accordance with CITY ordinance. Upon formation of a Community
Facilities District ( "CFD ") Property Owner may include the cost of the improvement
specified in this Section 2.C.7.b as part of the CFD financing. The Property Owner shall
receive credit against, or reimbursement of costs, in excess of the Transportation
Development Fee for the following "backbone" improvements as described herein, in
Development Agreement Traigh Pacific Properties
Ordinance No. 730A P208
Page 25 of 54
conformance with City Policy; East Avenue, Lower Crest Collector and the middle 38
feet of Etiwanda Avenue (full width across Southern California Edison corridor).
Other Circulation Improvements
improvements: The Property Owner shall design and construct the following
0) Etiwanda Avenue: Improve as a Secondary Arterial from
the north boundary of Tract 16072 to Lower Crest Collector, as depicted in Exhibit 4A.
These improvements shall be completed prior to the first release of occupancy, or to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer. Property Owner may request reimbursement
agreement to recover the cost for non - backbone improvements west of the centerline
from future development as it occurs on adjacent properties in the City limits. If the
Property Owner fails to submit said reimbursement agreement within 6- months of the
public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the Property Owner to
reimbursement shall terminate.
(ii) East Avenue: Construct Collector Street improvements
from the north boundary of Tract 16072 to Lower Crest Collector, as depicted in Exhibit
3A. These improvements shalt be completed prior to the first release of occupancy, or to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer,
(iii) Lower improvements along the entire length Crest tthe Project Site, assdepicted in e Exhibit Street
These improvements shall be completed prior to the first release of occupancy, or to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer,
6. Storm Drains
The Property Owner shall design and construct the following
improvements based on the criteria in the Etiwanda /San Sevaine Drainage Policy:
a. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area 3 Master Plan Storm Drain
(i) The Property Owner shall provide adequate easements
and construct local and Master Plan System 3 drainage facilities extending from the
Project Site to the Etiwanda Regional Spreading Grounds. System 3 includes the
projection of the existing open channel on the north boundary of Tentative Tract 14139,
east of East Avenue to the Etiwanda Spreading Grounds. Standard drainage fees for
the project shall be credited to the cost of permanent master plan facilities, in
accordance with City Policy. The Property Owner may request a reimbursement
agreement within 6 months of public improvements being accepted by the CITY, or all
rights of the development to reimbursement shall terminate.
s The Property
Interim Master Plan Basin No.2 and either ti in construedon of
he thhe Etiwanda/Summit otrethe Etiwanda/Arrow
Interim Regional Basin, to the satisfaction of the San Bernardino County Flood Control
District,
Development Agreement Traigh Pacific Properties
NZ W
Ordinance No. 730A
Page 26 of 54
b. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area 2 Master Plan Storm Drain
(i) The channel along the north tract boundary constitutes a
portion of the Master Plan System 2, which is required to protect the site from upstream
flows. The channel shall be designed to be extended westerly along the Rancho
Etiwanda Estates project. The Property Owner may also be required to install interim
Master Plan Basin No.1, within the Project Site, to the satisfaction of the San Bernardino
County Flood Control District. All flood protection improvements shall be completed
prior to the first release of occupancy, or to the satisfaction of the City Engineer,
including a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) issued by FEMA. Standard drainage fees for
the project shall be credited to the cost of permanent master plan facilities, in
accordance with City Policy. The Property Owner may request a reimbursement
agreement within 6 months of public improvements being accepted by the CITY, or all
rights of the development to reimbursement shall terminate.
(ii) Property owner shall construct Interim Master Plan Basin
No. 1 if so directed by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District. These
improvements shall be completed prior to the first release of occupancy, or to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
c. Local Storm Drains
The Property Owner shall construct local storm drains to convey
development drainage to the Master Plan Storm Drain. Extend the local storm drain
system as far on the Project Site as needed to contain Q25 within the tops of curbs,
Q100 within rights -of -way and provide a 10 -foot dry lane in Q10. The cost of the local
storm drain system shall be borne by the Property Owner without Fee Credits.
d. If interim basins are required by the San Bernardino County Flood
Control District, easements shall be provided to the City for any lots containing said
basins. Also, a maintenance agreement shalt be executed guaranteeing private
maintenance of the facilities, but providing the City with the right of access to maintain
the facilities if private maintenance is insufficient and allowing the City to assess those
costs to the developer. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to
recover the proportionate cost of the land and ultimate basin related facilities (outlet,
etc.) from future development using the basin. If the developer fails to submit said
reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted
by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate.
e. Development within the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Drainage Area is
responsible for the City's adopted regional drainage fee, which is not subject to fee
credittreimbursement like the master plan drainage fee.
9. Development of Park Sites
Property owner agrees to construct the Parks in substantial conformity
with the depiction and description of Exhibits 7A, 7B, and 7C in conformance with all
applicable standards and permit requirements. The Park improvements shall be
completed substantially complete by the one- hundredth (100th) building permit issuance
in the Project. The Property Owner will make a good faith effort to complete all actions
necessary to secure and complete work necessary to include the off -site special event
Development Agreement Traigh Pacific Properties
Ordinance No. 730A P210
Page 27 of 54
parking area as depicted in Exhibit 7A. The City agrees to promptly process all
applications and permits consistent with its usual and customary procedures. A portion
of the requited Equestrian Mitigation Fee shall be set aside as an endowment for capital
replacement and maintenance purposes, in the event of private maintenance default by
the tenant organization. The amount to be set aside shall be based on studies by the
developer, subject to approval of the City Planner and City Engineer. The endowment
shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits for the facility.
10. Park Fee /Equestrian Mitigation Fee /Beautification Fee
The Property Owner shall pay the following fees:
a. Property Owner will pay CITY a sum totaling $269,000 (based
upon $1,000 per unit) for equestrian purposes; however, the Property Owner shall
receive Equestrian Mitigation Fee credit for development of the North Etiwanda
Equestrian Center on Lot E as depicted on Exhibit 7A, which Equestrian Center
development costs will be limited to the total amount of Equestrian Mitigation Fees paid
by Tentative Tract 14749 and other contributing projects. The current estimate of
available Equestrian Mitigation Fees is $1.54 million. In addition, the Property Owner
may request a reimbursement agreement from the City, for costs incurred in the
development of the Equestrian Center that are over and above the obligation as noted
above. The credit will be based on the actual cost of the improvements toward payment
of the standard CITY Equestrian Mitigation Fee and the CITY Park Fee listed below in
Section 10.b. Reimbursement in excess of the CITY Equestrian Mitigation Fee
reimbursement shall be in the form of Park Fee credits toward the payment of the City
Park Fee listed below in Section 10.b. The North Etiwanda Equestrian Center shall be
constructed with Phase 1 of project development.
b. The Property Owner shall pay the CITY a sum totaling $1,775,400
for park purposes (based upon a value of $6,600 per unit); however, the Property Owner
shall receive Park Credit for the improvements to the North Etiwanda Preserve Trailhead
on Lot F as depicted on Exhibit 7C, and for the excess development cost of the
Equestrian Center pursuant to Section 10.a. above. The credit will be based on the
actual cost of the improvements toward payment of the standard CITY Park Fee. The
North Etiwanda Preserve Trailhead shall be constructed with Phase 1 of project
development.
C. In exchange for construction of landscaping improvements along
the south side of Lower Crest Collector, the Property Owners shall not be required to
pay CITY Beautification Fees for future residential construction.
11. Development Standards
The project shall be developed in accordance with the following
Development Standards. The Development Standards set the minimum requirements,
however, the intent of the Project is to develop the project consistent with the goals of
the CITY's Low - Density Residential District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan.
Lot Area: 8,400 Square Foot minimum
b. Lot Width: 60 -feet minimum as measured at building setback line.
Development Agreement Traigh Pacific Properties
P211
Ordinance No. 730A
Page 28 of 54
d. Lot Coverage; 40% maximum of lot area for building structures.
Paving driveways patios or pools shall not be calculated as part of building coverage.
e. Building Setbacks
(i) Frant Yard: Should be staggered with a minimum of
18 -feet and an average of 20 feet throughout the tract as measured at the right -of -way
line.
(ii) Side Yard: 15 -feet building separation is required with a
minimum of 5 -feet and 10 -feet side yards measured form the property line.
(iii) Rear Yard: 15 -feet minimum useable
(iv) Garage Placement: Where garages are entered from the
local street and the garage doors do not face the street (side -entry garages) the setback
shall be 10 -feet minimum from the back of the sidewalk.
(v) Building Height. 35 -feet maximum
f. Number of Housing Units: The project entitlements include 269
housing units.
12. Design Review Process
The Project, and all subsequent applications for residential development,
shall be subject to the CITY Development/Design Review process.
13. Architectural Guidelines
The Project, and all subsequent applications for residential development,
shall be subject to the Architectural Guidelines of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan.
'14. Open Space Transfer Plan
The Property Owner shaft transfer to the County of San Bernardino
Special Districts OS -1 other qualified conservation entity approved by the City, in fee, a
minimum of 164 -acres of off -site land for permanent open space and habitat
preservation; along with funding in an amount to be determined by County of San
Bernardino Special Districts (or other conservation entity), to provide for long -term
maintenance of said land. The preferred location of the off -site land is in the
environment surrounding the North Etiwanda Preserve in the CITY Sphere of Influence,
other properties may be considered based upon the review of appropriate Biological
Habitat Assessments and concurrence of the CITY Planner. The transfer and funding
shall occur prior to recording of the first final map of the Project.
D. Timing of Development and Fees
Development of the Perimeter Landscaping and the Etiwanda North
Specific Plan Neighborhood Monumentation
Development Agreement Traigh Pacific Properties
Ordinance No. 730A
Page 29 of 54
All perimeter landscaping, including the Upper Etiwanda Neighborhood
Monumentation, fencing, signage, and landscaping as depicted in the Etiwanda North
Specific Plan Exhibit 25A -C, shall be completed prior to the release of occupancy of the
100"' dwelling within the project. In addition, improvements to East Avenue, Etiwanda
Avenue and Lower Crest Collector shall conform to the Upper Etiwanda Neighborhood
Landscape theme as illustrated in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan Exhibit 21
(Landscape Street Sections B -1, M -1, and B-2, respectively). The landscape
improvements shall be annexed to LIVID No. 7, or other district as approved by the City
Engineer.
2. Development of the Remainder of the Site
Neither the property owner nor CITY can presently predict when or the
rate at which phases of the project shall be developed, since such decisions depend on
numerous factors which are not within the control of the Property Owner including,
without limitation, market orientation and demand, interest rates, absorption, competition
and other factors.
The parties acknowledge and agree that Property Owner, subject to the
restrictions and conditions in the Development Agreement, retains flexibility under this
Development Agreement to develop the Project in such order and at such rate and times
as are appropriate within the exercise of the Property Owner's business judgment. The
CITY further acknowledges that Property Owner may desire to market, sell, or otherwise
arrange for disposition of some or all of the Project Site, prior to development, and that
the rate at which the Project develops will likely depend upon the business judgment of
subsequent owners of the Project Site,
3. CITY's Cooperation
CITY shall use good faith efforts to promptly process and take final action
on any applications for permits or approvals filed by Property Owner with respect to the
Project. Such cooperation shall include, without limitation, (a) using good faith efforts to
Process subsequent Development/Design Review in accordance with state regulations;
and (b) promptly processing all ministerial permits in accordance with Section 2.1 below.
Without limiting the effect of any other provision of this Development Agreement, any
future regulation, whether adopted by initiative or otherwise, limiting the rate or timing of
development of the Project Site or the extent thereof, shall be deemed to conflict with
Property Owner's vested rights to develop the Project under this Development
Agreement and shall, to that extent, not apply to the development of the Project.
Processing and review of development proposals shall be subject to established
procedures in effect in the entire CITY, including Development and Design Review, as
specified in the Existing Laws. However, the criteria used in the evaluation of each
development proposal shall be based on the objectives, policies and specific
development standards specified herein.
4. Force Maieure
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Development
Agreement, Property Owner and CITY shall be excused from performance of their
obligations under this Development Agreement during any period of delay caused by
Development Agreement Traigh Pacific Properties
WARM
P213
Ordinance No. 730A
Page 30 of 54
acts of God or civil commotion, riots, strikes, picketing, or other labor disputes, shortage
of materials or supplies, or damage to or prevention of work by reason of fire, floods,
earthquake, or other casualties, litigation, acts or neglect of the Property Owner, as
applicable. The time of performance of such obligations as well as the term of this
Development agreement shall automatically be extended by the period of such delay
hereunder.
E. Future Entitlements
With respect to any entitlements that Property Owner may require in the future,
including, without limitation, tentative tract and parcel map approvals, conditional use
permits, and Development/Design Review, the CITY shall retain its discretionary review
authority and the CITY's applicable ordinances, rules, regulations and official policies.
However, any such discretionary review shall be expressly subject to the provisions of
this Development Agreement and the CITY may only impose conditions upon such
discretionary entitlements which are consistent with the Project Entitlements as
approved by this Development Agreement, except as otherwise specifically required by
state or federal law.
F. Environmental Review
Other than the mitigation measures and conditions of approval set forth in the
EIR and the Project Entitlements (and any additional future mitigation programs
contemplated therein), no other mitigation measures for environmental impacts created
by the Project, as presently approved and as evaluated in the EIR, shall be required. In
connection with the CITY's issuance of any further entitlement (as contemplated in
Section 2.E. above), which is subject to CEQA, the CITY shall promptly commence and
diligently process any and all initial studies and assessments required by CEQA, and to
the extent permitted by CEQA, the CITY shall use the EIR and other existing
environmental reports and studies as adequately addressing the environmental impacts
of such matter or matters, without requiring new or supplemental environmental
documentation. In the event CEQA requires any additional environmental review, the
CITY may impose additional measures (or conditions) to mitigate, as permitted by
.. CEQA, the adverse environmental impacts of such future entitlements, which were not
considered at the time of approval of the Project.
G. CITY Fees and Mandates by State and Federal !saws
The Parties acknowledge and agree that the fees and impositions which may
potentially be imposed by the CITY on the Project and Property Owner (collectively
"fees ") fall within one of three categories: (a) fees for processing land use and
construction permit applications which are not otherwise governed by the provisions of
Section 66000 of the Government Code (but which are subject to the limitations set forth
in Sections 66013, 66014, and 66016 - 66018.5 of the Government Code) (collectively,
the "Processing Fees "); (b) fees or other monetary exactions which are contemplated
under ordinances or resolutions in effect as of the date of this Development Agreement
and which purport to defray all or a portion of the cost of impacts to certain public
facilities, improvements and other amenities from the development projects, including
any fees described in Government Code Sections 66000 et seq. (collectively, the
"Existing Fee Categories ") (the Existing Fee Categories include any increases,
decreases, or other modifications to existing fees, so long as such modified fees relate
Development Agreement Traigh Pacific Properties
Ordinance No. 730A P214
Page 31 of 54
to the same category of impacts identified in the Existing Fee Categories); and (c) fees
or other monetary exactions which may be imposed in the future by the CITY for
purposes of defraying all or a portion of the cost of public facilities, improvements, or
amenities related to development projects, but excluding the Existing Fee Categories
( "other Fees "). The Property Owner's obligation to pay Fees shall be specifically
governed by the following provisions:
1. Processing Fees. The CITY may charge Planning and Engineering Plan
Check and Permit Fees and Building Permit Fees, which are in force and effect on a
CITY -wide basis at the time of Property Owner's application for a land use entitlement,
or a construction permit. The amount of any Processing Fees shall be determined by
the CITY in accordance with all applicable laws, including, without limitation,
Government Code Sections 66013, 66014, and 66017- 66018.5 (or any successor laws,
as applicable). Unless otherwise agreed by Property Owner and the CITY, the
Processing Fees assessed Property Owner shalt be the same as those imposed upon
other development projects throughout the jurisdictional limits of the CITY.
2. Other Fees. In consideration of the Property Owner's Agreement to
modify the Project Entitlements as specifically set forth in this Development Agreement
and implement the timing of development in accordance with the terms set forth above,
no Other Fees shall be imposed upon the Property Owner or the Project during the term
of this Development Agreement, except as may be specifically required to carry out any
state or federal law or mandate enacted after the effective date of this Development
Agreement, as necessary to mitigate environmental impacts of the project in accordance
with 2.G above.
3. Fiscal Impact Analysis. CITY does not require Property Owner or the
Proiect to complete a fiscal impact analysis for application or issuance of any approvals
or permits that CITY might issue under this Development Agreement.
H. Non - Discretionary Permits
The Parties acknowledge that in the course of implementing the Project, Property
Owner will, from time to time, apply to the CITY for various ministerial permits, licenses,
consents, certificates, and approvals, including, without limitation, non - discretionary
subdivision approvals, grading permits, construction permits, certificates of occupancy
and permits required to connect the Project to utility systems under the CITY's
jurisdiction (collectively the "Non- Discretionary Permits "), Property Owner shall have the
right to apply for any such Non- Discretionary Permits in accordance with the Existing
Laws (and any applicable Future Policies under Section 2.6., above). The CITY shall
issue to Property Owner, upon such applications, all required Non - Discretionary Permits,
subject only to compliance with the terms of this Development Agreement, the CITY's
usual and customary fees and charges for such applications and Non - Discretionary
Permits (subject to the provisions of Section H above) and the terms and conditions of
the applicable permit application. The CITY further agrees that upon its approval of any
plans, specifications, design drawings, maps, or other submittals of Property Owner in
conjunction with such Non - Discretionary Permits (the "Approved Plans "), all further
entitlements, approvals and consents required from the CITY to implement the Project
which are consistent with and further implement such Approved Plans, shall be
expeditiously processed and approved by the CITY in accordance with this Development
Agreement.
Development Agreement Traigh Pacific Properties
P215
Ordinance No. 730A
Page 32 of 54
Cooperation
1. Cooperation with Other Public Agencies. The CITY acknowledges that
the Property Owner may apply from time to time for permits and approvals as may be
required by other governmental or quasi - governmental agencies having jurisd;ction over
the Project, in conjunction with the development of or provision of services to the Project,
including, without limitation, approvals in connection with the developing and
implementing a tertiary water system, potential transportation improvements and other
on -site and off -site infrastructure. The CITY shall cooperate with Property Owner in its
efforts to obtain such permits and approvals from such agencies (including without
limitation, the Cucamonga Valley Water District, the Inland Empire Utilities Agency, the
San Bernardino County Flood Control District and Southern California Edison), and shall
provide any documents or certificates reasonably required to process and obtain such
permits and approvals.
2. Construction of Off -Site Improvements. To the extent that Property
Owner is required to construct any off -site street improvements as a condition of
developing the Project, the Property Owner shall make good faith efforts to acquire any
off -site property interests necessary to construct the required public improvements. If
Property Owner fails to do so, Property Owner shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal
of the first final subdivision map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the
improvements under Government Code Section 66462 and 66462.5 at such time as the
CITY decides to acquire the property interests required for the public improvements.
Such agreement shall provide for payment by Property fawner of all costs incurred by
the City if the City decides to acquire the off -site property interests required in
connection with the subdivision. Security for a portion of those costs shall be in the form
of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the City, at
Property Owner's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the CITY prior to
commencement of the appraisal.
To the extent that such off -site improvements, or the construction of any
substantial infrastructure on -site, substantially benefit other property owners or other
portions of the jurisdiction of limits of the CITY, the CITY agrees to assist Property
--+ Owner to the fullest extent possible in obtaining reimbursement or other fair share
contribution by such other benefited property owners. Such assistance may include,
without limitation, conditioning the approval of development projects proposed by such
benefited property owners upon such owners' contribution, on a fair share, pro-rata
basis, to the construction cost of such improvements, Without limiting the generality of
the foregoing, the CITY agrees with respect to the infrastructure improvements which
are adjacent to and benefit other properties (whether such properties are undeveloped
or developed), any further discretionary approvals sought by such property owners shall
be conditioned to require fair share reimbursement to Property Owner for ccnstruction
and related costs incurred in providing such improvements to the extent legally
permissible.
3. Public Financing. The Parties hereby acknowledge that substantial public
improvements must be funded in order to contribute to the Park, Beaitification,
Equestrian and School Fees, and the remainder of the Project Site and that public
financing of a substantial portion of these improvements will be critical to the economic
viability of the Project. Subject to CITY's ability to make all findings required by
applicable law and complying with all applicable legal procedures and requirements, the
Development Agreement Traigh Pacific Properties
Ordinance No. 734A P216
Page 33 of 54
CITY agrees to cooperate with and assist Property Owner to the fullest extent possible in
developing and implementing a public financing plan for the payment of public
infrastructure fees and the construction of the public infrastructure improvements. The
implementation of such plan may include, without limitation, the formation of one or more
assessment districts, or Mello -Roos community facilities districts, or the issuance of
bonds, certificates of participation, or other debt securities necessary to implement such
plan.
J. Creation of the Landscape and Street Lighting Maintenance District
The CITY agrees to promptly form the necessary Landscape Maintenance
District (LMD) pursuant to California Streets and Highways Code Sections 22500 et seq
(the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 ") for the Project development to encompass
the Project Site as well as the area being annexed by the CITY. The Property Owner
shall pay for the formation of the LMD. The Parties agree that the LMD must be
established no later than recordation of the first final tract map and that the CITY may
create an LMD, which allows annexation of other areas. In addition, if outside agencies,
upon their review and approval of various components of the project, impose any non-
standard improvements that require extraordinary maintenance responsibilities of the
CITY, the CITY may impose the creation of additional maintenance districts upon the
proposed development. Upon acceptance of improvements, the CITY (throughout the
LMD) shall assume full responsibility for the maintenance, repair and replacement of the
improvements to be maintained by the LMD pursuant to the LMDs governing
documents.
The Parties also acknowledge that assessments for the LMDs are collected
annually in June, and to the extent that assessments are collected through the LMD for
the period ending June 2006, the City may request, and the Property Owner agrees to
provide, reasonable cash deposit to fund the LMD. The CITY shall promptly upon
receipt of assessments the following June, reimburse Property Owner for any such cash
advances to fund the LMD.
Property Owner shall annex to the existing Street Lighting District for arterial
streets citywide (SLD1). Streetlights on local streets shalt be privately maintained.
Section 3. ANNUAL REVIEW
A. Good Faith Comafiance
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65866.1, the CITY shall once
every twelve (12) months during the term of this Development Agreement, review the
extent of good faith substantial compliance by Property Owner with the terms of this
Development Agreement; provided, however, that it is intended that this review shall
apply to the Project Site as a whole, as opposed to each individual property owner who
may own a parcel comprising the Project Site. In connection with such annual review,
Property Owner shall provide such information as may reasonably be requested by the
CITY in order to determine whether any provisions of this Agreement have been
breached by Property Owner. If at any time prior to the review period there is an issue
concerning a Property Owner's compliance with the terms of this Development
Agreement, the provisions of this Section 3 shall apply.
Development Agreement Traigh Pacific Properties
P217
Ordinance No. 730A
Page 34 of 54
B. Certificate of Compliance
If Property Owner is found to be in compliance with this Development Agreement
after annual review, the City Planner shall, upon written request by Property Owner,
issue a certificate of compliance ( "Certificate of Compliance ") to Property Owner stating
that, based upon information known to the CITY, the Development Agreement remains
in effect and Property Owner is not in default. The Certificate of Compliance shall be in
recordable form and shall contain such information as shall impart constructive record of
notice of compliance. Property Owner may record the Certificate of Compliance in the
Official Records of the County of San Bernardino,
C. Finding of Default
If, upon completion of the annual review, the City Planner intends to find that
Property Owner has not complied in good faith with the material terms of this Agreement
(a "Default"), he shall first give written notice of such effect to the Property Owner. The
notice shall be accompanied by copies of all staff reports, staff recommendations and
other information concerning Property Owner's compliance with the terms of this
Development Agreement as the CITY may possess and which is relevant to determining
Property Owner's performance under this Development Agreement. The notice shall
specify in detail the grounds and all facts allegedly demonstrating such noncompliance,
so Property Owner may address the issues raised on a point -by -point basis. Property
Owner shall have twenty (20) days after its receipt of such notice to file a written
response with the City Planner. Within ten (10) days after the expiration of such 20-day
response period, the City Planner shall notify Property Owner whether he has
determined that Property Owner is in Default under this Development Agreement
( "Notice of Default "). Such Notice of Default shall specify .the instances in which the
Property Owner has allegedly failed to comply with this Development Agreement and the
terms under which compliance can be obtained. The Notice of Default shall a so specify
a reasonable time for Property Owner to meet the terms of compliance, which time shall
not be less than thirty (30) days from the date of the Notice of Default, and which shall
be reasonably related to the time necessary to bring Property Owner's performance into
good faith compliance.
D. Right to Appeal
Upon receipt of the Notice of Default, the Property Owner may appeal the City
Planner's decision directly to the City Council. Such appeal shall be initiated by filing a
written notice of appeal with the City Clerk within the ten (10) calendar days following the
Property Owner's receipt of the Notice of Default. The hearing on such appeal shall be
scheduled in accordance with Section 17,02.080 of the CITY Development Code. At the
hearing, Property Owner shall be entitled to submit evidence and to address all the
issues raised by the Notice of Default. If, after considering all the evidence presented at
the hearing, the City Council finds and determines on the basis of substantial evidence
that the Property Owner is in Default, then the City Council shall specify in writing to
Property Owner the instances in which the Property Owner has failed to comply and the
temps under which compliance can be obtained, and shall also specify a reasonable time
for Property Owner to meet the terms of compliance, which time shall not be less than
thirty (30) days from the date of such writing from the City Council and which shall be
reasonably related to the time necessary to bring Property Owner's performance into
good faith compliance,
Development Agreement Traigh Pacific Properties
E. Pro a Uwner's Cure Rlahts
P218
Ordinance No. 730A
Page 35 of 54
If Property Owner is in Default under this Development Agreement, it shall have
a reasonable period of time to cure such Default before action is taken by the CITY to
terminate this Development Agreement or to otherwise amend or limit Property Owner's
rights under this Development Agreement. In no event shall such cure period be less
than the time set forth in the finding of Default made under Sections 3.C. or 3.D. above
(as applicable) or less than the time reasonably necessary to cure such Default. Any
such cure period shall be extended by force majeure circumstances described in Section
2.D.4. above.
Section 4. ENFORCEMENT
A. Enforcement hy Either Pnrh
Subject to all requirements mandated by applicable state or federal or other law,
this Development Agreement shall be enforceable by any of the parties to this
Agreement.
B. Cumulative Remedies
In addition to any other rights or remedies, any of the Parties may institute legal
action to cure, correct or remedy any Default (to the extent otherwise permitted herein
and in Government Code Section 65864 et seq. or any successor laws and regulations),
to enforce any covenant or agreement herein in this Development Agreement or to
enjoin any threatened or attempted violation, including suits for declaratory relief,
specific performance, and relief in the nature of mandamus. All of the remedies
described above shall be cumulative and not exclusive of one another, and the exercise
of any one or more of the remedies shall not constitute a waiver or election with respect
to any other available remedy. The provisions of this Section 4.B. are not intended to
modify other provisions of the Development Agreement and are not intended to provide
additional remedies not otherwise permitted by law.
C. Attorney's Fees
In any legal proceedings brought by either party to enforce any covenant or any
of the Parties' rights or remedies under this Development Agreement including, without
limitation, any action for declaratory or equitable relief, the prevailing party shall be
entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees and all reasonable costs, expenses and
disbursements in connection with such action. Any such attorneys' fees and other
expenses incurred by either of the Parties in enforcing a judgment in its favor under this
Development Agreement shall be recoverable separately from and in addition to any
other amount included in this judgment, and such attorneys' fees obligation is intended
to be severable from the other provisions of this Development Agreement and to survive
and not be merged into any such judgment.
Development Agreement Traigh Pacific Properties
aAR K
Ordinance No. 730A
Page 36 of 54
Section 5. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
A. Successors and Assigns
Subject to the provisions of Section 1C above, the terms of this Development
Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Parties, and their
successors and assigns. Insofar as this Development Agreement refers to Property
Owner, as defined herein, if the rights under this Development Agreement are assigned,
the term "Property Owner' shall refer to any such successor or assign.
B. Project as a Private Undertaking
It is specifically understood and agreed by and between the Parties that the
Project is a private development, that neither party is acting as the agent of the other in
any respect under this Development Agreement, and that each of the Parties is an
independent contracting entity with respect to the terms, covenants and conditions
contained in this Development Agreement. No partnership, joint venture or other
association of any kind is formed by this Development Agreement. The only relationship
between the CITY and Property Owner is that of a government entity regulating the
development of private property and the owner of such private property.
C. Captions
The captions of this Development Agreement are for convenience and reference
only and shall in no way define, explain, modify, construe, limit, amplify or aid in the
interpretation, construction or meaning of any of the provisions of this Development
Agreement,
D. Mortgage Protection
1. Discretion to Encumber. This Development Agreement shall not prevent
or limit Property Owner, in any manner, at Property Owner's sole discretion, from
encumbering the Project or any portion of the Project or any improvements on the
Project, by any mortgage, deed of trust or other security device securing financing with
respect to all or any part of the Project or any improvements thereon (a "Mortgage ").
2. Effect of Default. This Development Agreement shall be superior and
senior to any mortgage subsequently placed upon the property, or any portion :hereof, or
any improvement thereon, including the lien of any mortgage or deed of trust. Despite
the foregoing, breach of any provision of this Development Agreement shall not defeat,
render invalid, diminish or impair the lien of any Mortgage made in good faith for value.
3. Mortgagee Not Obligated. Notwithstanding anything in this Development
Agreement to the contrary, (a) any holder of the beneficial interest under a Mortgage
( "Mortgagee ") may acquire to or possession of all or any portion of the Project or any
improvement thereon pursuant to the remedies provided by its Mortgage, whether by
judicial or non - judicial foreclosure, deed in lieu of foreclosure, or otherwise, and such
Mortgagee shall not have any obligation under this Development Agreement to
construct, fund or otherwise perform any affirmative obligation or affirmative covenant of
Property Owner hereunder or to guarantee such performance, and Mortgagee rnay, after
acquiring title to all or any portion of the Project as aforesaid, assign or otherwise
Development Agreement Traigh Pacific Properties
Ordinance No. 730A P220
Page 37 of 54
transfer the Project or any such portion thereof to any person or entity, and upon the
giving of notice of such assignment or transfer to the CITY and the assumption by the
assignee or transferee of the obligations of the Property Owner with respect to the
Property Owner or portion thereof so acquired which arise or accrue from and after the
date of assignment or transfer, Mortgagee shall be relieved and discharged of and from
any and all further obligations or liabilities under this Development Agreement with
respect to the Project or portion thereof so assigned or transferred; and (b) the consent
of CITY shall not be required for the acquisition of all or any portion of the Project by any
purchaser at a foreclosure sale conducted pursuant to the terms of any Mortgage, and
such purchaser shall, by virtue of acquiring title to the Project or such portion thereof, be
deemed to have assumed all obligations of Property Owner with respect to the Project or
portion thereof so acquired which arise or accrue subsequent to the purchase date, but
such purchaser shall not be responsible for any prior defaults of Property Owner;
provided, however, that in either of the instances referred to in clauses (a) or (b) above,
to the extent any obligation or covenant to be performed by Property Owner is a
condition to granting of a specific benefit or to the performance of a specific covenant by
CITY, the performance thereof shall continue to be a condition precedent to the CITY's
granting of such benefit and performance of such covenant hereunder.
4. Notice of Default to Mortgagee: Right of Mortgagee to Cure. If a
Mortgagee files with the CITY Clerk, a written notice requesting a copy of any Notice of
Default given Property Owner under this Development Agreement and specifying the
address for delivery thereof, the CITY shall deliver to such Mortgagee, concurrently with
delivery thereof to Property Owner, any notice given to Property Owner with respect to
any claim of the CITY that Property Owner has not complied with the terms of this
Development Agreement or is otherwise in Default under this Development Agreement.
Each such Mortgagee shall have the right (but not the obligation) for a period of thirty
(30) days after the expiration of any cure period given to Property Owner with respect to
such Default, to cure such default; provided, however, that if any such Default cannot,
with diligence, be remedied or cured within such thirty (30) day period, then such
Mortgagee shall have such additional time as may be necessary to remedy or cure such
Default, if such Mortgagee commences to remedy or cure within such thirty (30) day
period, and thereafter diligently pursues and completes such remedy or cure.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Default is of a nature which can only be cured by
Mortgagee by obtaining possession, such Mortgagee shall be deemed to have remedied
or cured such Default such Mortgagee shall, within such thirty (30) day period,
commences efforts to obtain possession and carry the same forward with diligence and
continuity through implementation of foreclosure, appointment of a receiver or otherwise,
and shall thereafter remedy or cure or commence to remedy or cure the Default within
the cure period specified in Section 3.E above.
5. Bankruptcy. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 5D4 above, if a
Mortgagee is prohibited from commencing or prosecuting foreclosure or other
appropriate proceedings in the nature thereof to obtain possession of the Project Site by
any process or injunction issued by any court or by any reason of any action by any
court having jurisdiction of any bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding involving Property
Owner, Mortgagee shall for the purposes of this Development Agreement be deemed to
be proceeding with diligence and continuity to obtain possession of the Property during
the period of such prohibition if Mortgagee is proceeding diligently to terminate such
prohibition.
Development Agreement Traigh Pacific Properties
r
Ordinance No, 730A P221
Page 38 of 54
6. Amendment to Development Agreement. The CITY and Property Owner
agree not to modify this Development Agreement or to allow this Development
Agreement to be modified or amended in any way, or cancel this Development
Agreement, without the prior written consent of each Mortgagee, which consent shall not
be unreasonably withheld or delayed. Notwithstanding anything stated above to the
contrary, the CITY and Property Owner shall cooperate in including in this Development
Agreement, by suitable implementing agreement from time to time, any provision which
may reasonably be requested by a proposed Mortgagee for the purpose of implementing
the mortgagee- protection provisions contained in this Development Agreement and
allowing such Mortgagee reasonable means to protect or preserve the lien of the
Mortgage on the occurrence of a default under the terms of this Development
Agreement. The CITY and Property Owner each agree to execute aid deliver
(acknowledge, if necessary for recording purposes) any implementing agreement
necessary to effect such request; provided, however, that any such implementing
agreement shall not in any material respect adversely effect any rights of the CITY under
this Development Agreement or be materially inconsistent with the substantive
provisions of this Development Agreement, the Project Entitlements and the Existing
Laws.
E. Consent
Where the consent or approval of any of the Parties is required in or necessary
under this Development Agreement, unless the context otherwise indicates, such
consent or approval shall not be unreasonably withheld.
F. Entire Agreement
This Development Agreement and the documents attached to and referred to in
this Development Agreement constitute the entire agreement between Parties with
respect to the subject matter of this Development Agreement.
G. Further Actlons and Entitlements
Each of the Parties shall cooperate with and provide reasonable assistance to
the other to the extent contemplated under this Development Agreement in the
performance of all obligations under this Development Agreement and the satisfaction of
the conditions of this Development Agreement.
}i. Governing Law
This Development Agreement including, without limitation, its existence, validity,
construction and operation, and the rights of each of the Parties shalt be determined in
accordance with the laws of the State of California.
Recording
The CITY Cleric shall cause a copy of this Development Agreement to be
recorded in the office of the Recorder of the County of San Bernardino no later than ten
(10) days following the effective date of this Development Agreement.
Development Agreement Traigh Pacific Properties
P222
Ordinance No. 730A
Page 39 of 54
J. Time
Time is of the essence in this Development Agreement and of each and every
term and condition of this Development Agreement.
K. Waiver
The failure of any of the Parties at any time to seek redress for any violation of
this Development Agreement or any appticable law or regulation or to insist upon the
strict performance of any term or condition shall not prevent any subsequent act or
omission of the same or similar nature which would have originally constituted a breach
of, or default under this Development Agreement from having all the force and effect of
an original breach or default, and such subsequent act or omission may be proceeded
against to the fullest extent provided by this Development Agreement. No provision of
this Development Agreement shall be deemed to have been waived by a party unless
the waiver is in writing and signed by all of the Parties.
L., Partlallnvafidit
If any term, covenant, condition or provision of this Development Agreement is
held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the
remainder of the provisions of this Development Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect and shall in no way be affected, impaired or invalidated thereby.
M. Notices
All notices between the CITY and Property Owner and any transferee under this
Development Agreement, shall be in writing and shall be given by personal delivery, mail
or facsimile. Notice by personal delivery or facsimile shall be deemed effective upon
delivery of such notice to the party for which it is intended at the address set forth below
(or, in the case of a transferee in a written notice to the CITY). Notice by mail shall be
deemed effective upon receipt or rejection of the addressee. The Parties' current
addresses are as follows:
To CITY: Jack Lam, AICP
City Manager
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga CA 91730
With Copies to: James Markman
City Attorney
Richards, Watson, & Gershon
One Civic Center Circle
Brea CA 92821
Development Agreement Traigh Pacific Properties
s
u.
U s
w `
1�
s
li
P224
Ordinance No. 730A
Page 41 of 54
i z
" EE
u '
6
Jr
Eii
i fill
9
%Yirk M�re
, - ( I, , I � , '-" , , ) , 1. 1-1
z
z
0
Y
>i
t
I!
s
t.
t'
III
��
IIII I���
iii
111 III
11
III itlll
I�
IU
tli
n
ib rlli
�i[,Ii
•�I�
s
u.
U s
w `
1�
s
li
P224
Ordinance No. 730A
Page 41 of 54
i z
" EE
u '
6
Jr
Eii
i fill
9
%Yirk M�re
, - ( I, , I � , '-" , , ) , 1. 1-1
z
z
0
Y
>i
t
I!
s
t.
t'
s
d
a`s
d
r
—0
P225
Ordinance No. 730A
Page 42 of 54
" t
•h' Lam,. � � � ! ( §g�
fill
� I
d.
A
� CJ
j� v w
!� y f n o
1 5 IR [ 11,55 [ p� 4 � � D
t3 -6
�{ �y o v
[ OD r• [ ;�
itOO ��� ��VD
a&
U
s
i~
1
m
V
LU z
z
:3
� Lu
W�
LLJ
CL
2 -:�
0- :�
V)
LU
tL3
L2 :;z T
C U-i
CL
-j
CL V)
ow 0
uj z
uj
J
V) V) 0
8
4% v
v
N
uj
CL
> 0-00C 0
V) L2
0 z
Z 5:
0
Ordinance No. 730A
Page 43 of 54
z
Coll
u
Z
aL
uu
a-
0
wu
0
P226
Ordinance No. 730A
Page 44 of 54
P227
Zl
4
I-
7 c C'q
LLJ
LU
GO
Ordinance No, 730A
Page 45 of 54
P228
Ordinance No. 730A
Page 46 of 54
P229
�0
Qu
3: 1
Cr
I
14
L,J
=
V)
LLJ
C�
LU
Ordinance No. 730A
Page 47 of 54
P230
LLJ
CY
UJ
C'4
�0
Qu
3: 1
Cr
I
14
L,J
=
V)
LLJ
C�
LU
Ordinance No. 730A
Page 47 of 54
P230
i 10
Lu
Q 4 N
pM ak
A► .0
w
v
cc �;
°' L-L:
0 o ti
J � �
W �
(N4
• 4
9$
AM
00
Cj
4
r
I&
A
we
pM ak
A► .0
w
v
cc �;
°' L-L:
0 o ti
J � �
W �
f�
i
Cj
4
r
I&
A
we
f�
Ordinance No. 730A
Page 48 of 54
aul
3RN3Ay as
P231
Cj
r
I&
A
Ordinance No. 730A
Page 48 of 54
aul
3RN3Ay as
P231
Ordinance No. 730A
Page 49 of 54
a
N
k
1�
°z
LM
ry ¢ w
P232
N
P234
Ordinance No. 730A
Page 51 of 54
Ckf
LLl
Cl
LO F=
w W
cr-
Ckf
o
C-4
>- z-
-N
-H
LLJ
LLJ ¢ Ld
Of
U-i Lu
z
5
'Cli
ry
in
N
P234
Ordinance No. 730A
Page 51 of 54
Ckf
LLl
Cl
LO F=
w W
cr-
Ckf
o
RY
P
�Y
>1Kx
IS
if
i
j
WOW W. li
FUTURE
i
OVERRDW PARKMG
SOLO" CALATOM6
Ordinance No. 730A
Page 52 of 54
LOT T PARKING RECAP:
rwlra.a +rsc�
rrroueu�m�xx u
taritrlTVALpfOmiTMt1 tl
ocn.warww�v ai.7 +
(12) iZXIT0VTD0(3 C0YVWsruu
:Nml
04FOWAMN KXXK,.04b TRAIL fins
D CQPV'QSW GRAM FAMCNG SURFACE
C e
f ' lSt7 +A _
LOT'E' and'Z' EQUESTRIAN CENTER and PARKING
PreNminary E"st m WWII MJ S Desig n Group K
and T ftld PSMM Ut Sift P landscape Architecture + Planning t Design CWKWY VMS"
2917 Lafryeet Nswpat B08A* Gt 9260
EXHIBIT 7A ( 9b9) 67S ~F2x(942)6T5-9974mjsdw*Fgrm0•0=
P235
P236
Ordinance No. 730A
Page 53 of 54
!Development Agreement DRC2003 -00411
Equestrian Center Design Amenities
General Description:
The Equestrian Facility as proposed would consist of a large enclosed arena (100 feet by 250 feet).. Two covered round pens
would be located one on each end for exercising animals and teaching some lessons. Bleacher seats for up to 50 persons
would be needed for spectators. There would be 10 —12 barn stalls to house Program horses. Special Event parking (up to
12 such events per year) would include 20 Trailer and 50 passenger car spaces to be located on a graded but unimproved
area on adjacent to the south SBCFCD (fee owned)/ SCE (easement) Utility Corridor Area. Other items would include snack
bar, office, community meeting room, and care taker apartment within the main Barn Structure.
The Arena would be used for riders, shows, clinics and seminars. This area would be equipped with lights and bells for the
disabled. A hydraulic fifl would be available for those in wheel chairs or others in need of assistance with mounting and
dismounting.
The living quarters would be used as a Care Taker residence for someone (possibly a student needing experience or an
internship) to care for the animals and property.
The following detail list constitutes the desired and not final amenities and will be modified based upon budget considerations
during the design phase:
1. Indoor and outdoor dust control
2, indoor Fly control system
3. Concrete floors on indoor barn and aisle with rubber matslagatile
4. Indoor Barn Stalls equipped with Dutch type doors
5. Ventilation — Cooling/Heating System for Barn complex (meets applicable UBC)
6. Automatic Fire and Burglar Alarm System
7. Closed circuit (B &W) TV monitoring system
8. Lighting both inside and out (outside area minimum f candle foot security requirement of the City)
9. 270 V electrical connection for ceramic kiln for Art Therapy Program
10. Data and Cable TV wired to Office and Care Taker Unit.
11. Telephones in Barn Aisl e, Office and Care Taker Unit.
12. Out door drop oft area and vehicle circulation for both disabled and Horse Trailers
13. On site Staff and Visitor Parking — 6 Spaces.
14, Automatic Waters both Inside and outside for each stall and t in the center aisle with individual and independent shut off
valves.
15. Manure container enclosure with weekly pick up.
16. Signage
17. Inside and outside PA system
18. 2 Round Pens with covers
18. Vehicle security gates for driveway connections.
20. 12 outdoor horse stalls with covers and enclosures on three sides for visitors.
21. Limited (250 Sq. ff. max.) accent landscaped and irrigated planter at building entrance.
22. Perimeter landscaping shall be included within street and trail right of way and maintained by the Lfv1D.
23. Arena Footing will consist of a minimum 6" gravel base. 4' arena Sand, and 2" of pine shavings or material may be
considered during the design phase
LI
I
11 .. 11—WAIR
MRF.
L
- ---------
0
i,7
Ordinance No. 730A P237
Page 54 of 54
2+-IJI
(n
2 0
0
V
2 �?
E ;4
A U�,
RESOLUTION NO. 14-213
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A ONE (1)
YEAR EXTENSION OF AN EXISTING DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT (DRC2003 -00411), AN AGREEMENT FOR AN
APPROVED PROJECT OF 269 SINGLE - FAMILY LOTS ON
APPROXIMATELY 168.77 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE
ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED NORTH OF THE
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CORRIDOR BETWEEN
ETIWANDA AVENUE AND EAST AVENUE; AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1087-081-03,04,06,06,
07, 08, 09.
A. Recitals,
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga, on behalf of WSI Highland Investments, LLC (property
owner), filed an application for the extension of the term for a Development Agreement (time
extension), as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
subject time extension request is referred to as "the application."
2. On November 3, 2004, this Council adopted its Ordinance No. 730A, thereby approving the
Development Agreement subject to speck conditions and time limits.
3. On November 19, 2014, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a
public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date.
4. The Effective Date of the Development Agreement was January 18, 2005. Since the
agreement runs for ten years, the expiration date is January 18, 2015.
5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A,
of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above - referenced
hearing on November 19, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, this Council hereby
specifically finds as follows:
a. The applicant does not propose any changes to the original project in conjunction
with this time extension request;
b. A one -year (1) extension of the Development Agreement will not cause significant
inconsistencies with the current General Plan, Specific Plan, ordinances, plans,
codes and policies;
Resolution No. 14 -213 — Page 1 of 3
9FAT:V
1J239
c. The extension of the Development Agreement will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity; and
d. The extension request was received within the time limits established by Section
17.14.090 (C) of the Development Code.
3. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written
and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City
Council finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required
pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review
and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations:
a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ( "CEQA ") and the City's local
CEQA Guidelines, the City Council certified an Environmental Impact Report on July
21, 2004 (State Clearing House #2003081085) in connection with the City`s approval
of Annexation DRC2003- 10151, Tentative Tract SUBTT14749 and Development
Agreement DRC2003-00411. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no
subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection
with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial
changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the
environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under
which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe
environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have
new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation
measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can
be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. Staff has evaluated the Time Extension
request and concludes that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances
surrounding the project have not occurred and are not proposed which would create
new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previously certified EIR. In
that the Time Extension is being requested in order to provide additional time for the
developer to work with the City to address requirements of the Development
Agreement, staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant
effects not discussed in the previously certified EIR, not have more severe effects
than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not
required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less- than - significant.
b. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the City Council concurs with
the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant
to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of the Time Extension
DRC2014-00876 for Development Agreement DRC2003- 00411.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this
Council hereby extends the term of Development Agreement DRC2003 -O 411 by an
additional one (1) year, attached thereto and incorporated herein by this reference, to expire
on January 18, 2016.
5. The Secretary to this Council shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
Resolution No. 14 -213 — Page 2 of 3
P240
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 19th day of November 2014.
AYES: Alexander, Michael, Spagnolo, Williams
NOES: None
ABSENT: Steinorth
ABSTAINED: None
L. ennis Michael, Mayor
ATTEST:
e" 2
J ce C. Reynolds, City Cle
I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted
by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City
Council held on the 19th day of November 2014.
Executed this 20th day of November 2014, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
�
i6e C. Reynolds, City Cle
Resolution No. 14 -213 — Page 3 of 3
arzIil
RESOLUTION NO. 15 -219
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TIME EXTENSION
DRC2015 -01084 TO ALLOW FOR A ONE (1) YEAR TIME EXTENSION
OF AN EXISTING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (DRC2003- 00411), AN
AGREEMENT FOR AN APPROVED PROJECT OF 269 SINGLE - FAMILY
LOTS ON APPROXIMATELY 168.77 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE
ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED NORTH OF THE
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CORRIDOR BETWEEN ETIWANDA
AVENUE AND EAST AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF - APN: 1087 - 081 -03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09.
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga, on behalf of WSI Highland Investments, LLC
(property owner), filed an application for the extension of the term for a Development Agreement
(time extension), as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
subject time extension request is referred to as "the application."
2. On November 3, 2004, this Council adopted its Ordinance No. 730A, thereby
approving the Development Agreement subject to specific conditions and time limits. The
Effective Date of the Development Agreement was January 18, 2005. Since the agreement runs
for ten years, the expiration date was January 18, 2015.
3. On November 19, 2014, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved
Time Extension DRC2014- 00876, which allowed for a one (1) year time extension of the subject
Development Agreement (DRC2003- 00411). This generated a new expiration date of January 18,
2016.
4. On December 16, 2015, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted
a public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date.
5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above -
referenced hearing on December 16, 2015, including written and oral staff reports, this Council
hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The applicant does not propose any changes to the original project in conjunction
with this time extension request;
Resolution No. 15 -219 - Page 1 of 3
yzya
RESOLUTION NO. 15 -219
TIME EXTENSION DRC2015- 01084 — WSI HIGHLAND INVESTMENTS, LLC
December 16, 2015
Page 2
b. A one -year (1) time extension of the Development Agreement will not cause
significant inconsistencies with the current General Plan, Specific Plan, ordinances, plans, codes
and policies;
C. The extension of the Development Agreement will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity; and
d. The extension request was received within the time limits established by Section
17.14.090 (C) of the Development Code.
3. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all
written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City
Council finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant
to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of
this application based upon the following findings and determinations:
a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ( "CEQA") and the City's
local CEQA Guidelines, the City Council certified an Environmental Impact Report on July 21,
2004 (State Clearing House #2003081085) in connection with the City's approval of Annexation
DRC2003- 10151, Tentative Tract SUBTT14749 and Development Agreement DRC2003- 00411.
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative
Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project
unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe
impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under
which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental
impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts
than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce
impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. Staff
has evaluated the Time Extension request and concludes that substantial changes to the project
or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred and are not proposed which
would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previously certified EIR. In
that the Time Extension is being requested in order to provide additional time for the developer to
work with the City to address requirements of the Development Agreement, staff further finds that
the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previously certified
EIR, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different
mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less -than-
significant.
b. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the City Council concurs
with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA
in connection with the City's consideration of the Time Extension DRC2015 -01084 for
Development Agreement DRC2003- 00411.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above,
this Council hereby extends the term of Development Agreement DRC2003 -00411 by an additional
Resolution No. 15 -219 - Page 2 of 3
RESOLUTION NO. 15-218
TIME EXTENSION DRC2O15-01D84—VVG| HIGHLAND INVESTMENTS, LUC
December 1O.2O15
Page
ORB (1) year, attached thereto and incorporated herein by this r8fe[eDC8. to expire on J8DU8[y 18.
2017.
b. The Secretary to this Council shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LWV
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
[_, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, dOhereby certify that the foregoing
{}FdiO8Dc8 was introduced at 8 [8gU|8[ meeting of the City Council held OD the 10th day of
[]eC8nObe[ 2015. and was finally p8SS8d at a regular Dl88tiOg of the City (|OUDCi| of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga held oD the day of______.2O15.by the following vote:
AYES: C{}UNQLK4EKABERS:
NOES: COUNC|LW1EN1BERG:
Resolution No. 15-219 - Page 3 of 3
December 16, 2015, 2015 City Council Meeting I Advertised Public Hearing Item P1 .
Resolution No. !6 -215 15 -2201 Ref: P241
RESOLUTION NO. 15 219 220
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TIME
EXTENSION DRC2015 -01084 TO ALLOW FOR A ONE (1) YEAR
TIME EXTENSION OF AN EXISTING DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT (DRC2003- 00411), AN AGREEMENT FOR AN
APPROVED PROJECT OF 269 SINGLE - FAMILY LOTS ON
APPROXIMATELY 168.77 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE
ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED NORTH OF THE
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CORRIDOR BETWEEN
ETIWANDA AVENUE AND EAST AVENUE; AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1087 - 081 -03, 04, 05,
06, 07, 08, 09.
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga, on behalf of WSI Highland Investments, LLC
(property owner), filed an application for the extension of the term for a Development Agreement
(time extension), as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
subject time extension request is referred to as "the application."
2. On November 3, 2004, this Council adopted its Ordinance No. 730A, thereby
approving the Development Agreement subject to specific conditions and time limits. The
Effective Date of the Development Agreement was January 18, 2005. Since the agreement runs
for ten years, the expiration date was January 18, 2015.
3. On November 19, 2014, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved
Time Extension DRC2014- 00876, which allowed for a one (1) year time extension of the subject
Development Agreement (DRC2003- 00411). This generated a new expiration date of January 18,
2016.
4. On December 16, 2015, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted
a public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date.
5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above -
referenced hearing on December 16, 2015, including written and oral staff reports, this Council
hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The applicant does not propose any changes to the original project in conjunction
with this time extension request;
Resolution No. 15 -220 — Page 1 of 3
b. A one -year (1) time extension of the Development Agreement will not cause
significant inconsistencies with the current General Plan, Specific Plan, ordinances, plans, codes
and policies;
C. The extension of the Development Agreement will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity; and
d. The extension request was received within the time limits established by Section
17.14.090 (C) of the Development Code.
3. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all
written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City
Council finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant
to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of
this application based upon the following findings and determinations:
a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ( "CEQA ") and the City's
local CEQA Guidelines, the City Council certified an Environmental Impact Report on July 21,
2004 (State Clearing House #2003081085) in connection with the City's approval of Annexation
DRC2003- 10151, Tentative Tract SUBTT14749 and Development Agreement DRC2003- 00411.
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative
Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project
unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe
impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under
which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental
impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts
than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce
impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. Staff
has evaluated the Time Extension request and concludes that substantial changes to the project
or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred and are not proposed which
would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previously certified EIR. In
that the Time Extension is being requested in order to provide additional time for the developer to
work with the City to address requirements of the Development Agreement, staff further finds that
the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previously certified
EIR, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different
mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less -than-
significant.
b. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the City Council concurs
with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA
in connection with the City's consideration of the Time Extension DRC2015 -01084 for
Development Agreement DRC2003- 00411.
4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above,
this Council hereby extends the term of Development Agreement DRC2003 -00411 by an additional
one (1) year, attached thereto and incorporated herein by this reference, to expire on January 18,
2017.
5. The Secretary to this Council shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
Resolution No. 15 -220 — Page 2 of 3
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 161h day of December 2015.
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
ATTEST:
Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk
I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and
adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting
of said City Council held on the 16th day of December 2015.
Executed this 17'h day of December 2015, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk
Resolution No. 15 -220 — Page 3 of 3
yzEll
STAFF REPoRT -
LNGINI?IiRING SriRviC1sS DiJ'ARTNIFINT
RANCHO
Date: December 16, 2015 UCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
John R. Gillison, City Manager
From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services /City Engineer
By: Romeo M. David, Associate Engineer
Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer J
Subject: CONSIDERATION TO ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE
THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $288,975.00, TO THE
LOWEST RESPONSIVE BIDDER, VIDO SAMARZICH, INC., AND AUTHORIZE THE
EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $28,897.50, FOR THE
RED HILL PARK LAKE MODERNIZATION PROJECT TO BE FUNDED FROM CAPITAL
RESERVE FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 1025001- 5650/1897025 -0 AND APPROPRIATE AN
ADDITIONAL AMOUNT OF $317,872.50 TO ACCOUNT NO. 1025001- 5650/1897025 -0
FROM CAPITAL RESERVE FUND BALANCE
NX400TIN1410r� 0
It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the
execution of the contract in the amount of $288,975.00, to the lowest responsive bidder, Vido
Samarzich, Inc., and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $28,897.50,
for the Red Hill Park Lake Modernization Project to be funded from Capital Reserve Funds, Account
No. 1025001 - 5650/1897025 -0 and appropriate an additional amount of $317,872.50 to Account No.
1025001 - 5650/1897025 -0 from Capital Reserve Fund balance.
BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS
Previously, on March 2, 2015, bids were received and opened for the subject project. The Engineer's
estimate was $250,000; however, after evaluating the bids, staff determined that all bids received
exceeded the Engineer's estimate by no less than 18 percent. In being financially prudent, on April
1, 2015 staff recommended to City Council that all bids be rejected for the Red Hill Park Lake
Modernization Project as non - responsive to the needs of the City. Staff was directed to reevaluate
the project and make necessary modifications (value Engineering) to attempt to solicit bids in -line
with the Engineer's estimate.
In August 2015 Pacific Advanced Civil Engineering ( "PACE ") redesigned the project to save cost of
approximately $24,190. The project was re- advertised on October 21, 2015.
Bids were solicited, received and opened on November 10, 2015, for the subject project. Staff has
reviewed all bids received and found all but one to be complete and in accordance with the bid
requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. The bid from the second low bidder, Kasa
Construction, was found to be non - responsive as their bid package was not complete and missing an
addendum. Even though the bid from Vido Samarzich is approximately 16% higher than the
Engineer's estimate, it is lower than the previous bid in March 2015 and therefore staff believes the
bid is reasonable. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds the lowest
responsive bidder meets the requirements of the bid documents.
P245
City Council Staff Report - Award Red Hill Park Lake Modernization Project
December 16, 2015
Page 2
On December 2, 2015, Council unanimously approved moving forward with this award and construction of
the lake modernization improvements.
The scope of work consists of modify existing irrigation, installation of new 4" mainline, new isolation valves,
re-routing irrigation wires, new controller and cabinet, lake inlet and outlet modifications, new pumps and
controller, solar panels, eyeball inlet fittings, aeration, irrigation skid, new reducer and pipe spool, new
skimmer baskets and other miscellaneous items as noted in the plans and specifications. The contract
documents call for thirty-five (35) working days to complete this construction.
MAS/RMD/SH:ls
Attachments
P246
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ills",
RED HILL PARK BENNO
LAKE MODERNIZATION
9%W
STAFF REPoRT _ l
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
RANCHO
Date: December 16, 2015 C,'UCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
John R. Gillison, City Manager
From: Jeffrey Bloom, Deputy City Manager, Economic and Community Development
Subject: CONSIDERATION OF URGENCY ZONING ORDINANCE NO 884, An Interim
Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Prohibiting All
Commercial Cannabis Uses in the City, Including Deliveries, Prohibiting All Medical
Marijuana Cultivation, Including Cultivation for Medical Use by a Qualified Patient Or
Primary Caregiver, and Declaring The Urgency Thereof
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Urgency Ordinance No.
884, prohibiting all commercial cannabis uses in the city, including deliveries, and prohibiting all
medical marijuana cultivation, including cultivation for medical use by a qualified patient or primary
caregiver.
Ordinance No. 884 would be adopted on an urgency basis and therefore go into effect
immediately under Government Code 65858 and expire forty -five (45) days later unless
subsequently extended by the City Council.
The City Council is being asked to determine that there is a current and immediate threat to the
public health, safety, and welfare presented by the potential establishment and operation of
commercial cannabis activities under the recent enactment of the Medical Marijuana Regulation
and Safety Act (MMRSA), which goes into effect on January 1, 2016. The potential for commercial
cannabis activities, including deliveries and cultivation of marijuana for personal medical use,
which are also associated with a March 1, 2016 deadline under the MMRSA, all create an urgent
need for further City action to maintain local control.
On October 9, 2015 Governor Brown signed Assembly Bill No. 243, Assembly Bill No. 266, and
Senate Bill 643 into law, which collectively are known as the Medical Marijuana Regulation and
Safety Act ( "MMRSA "). The MMRSA sets up a State licensing scheme for commercial medical
marijuana uses, while protecting local control by requiring that all such businesses must have a
local license or permit to operate in addition to a State license. The MMRSA allows Rancho
Cucamonga to completely prohibit commercial medical marijuana activities, but requires cities to
adopt regulations or prohibitions on the cultivation of cannabis either expressly or otherwise under
the principles of permissive zoning, or the State will become the sole licensing authority effective
March 1, 2016. The MMRSA also contains language that requires delivery services to be
expressly prohibited by local ordinance, if a city wishes to do so. If Rancho Cucamonga allows
the State to have the licensing control, then we would be unable to further regulate marijuana
cultivation in the City in the future.
The MMRSA follows the voters' approval of the State of California of Proposition 215 (codified as
California Health and Safety Code Section 11362.5, and entitled "The Compassionate Use Act of
yzR1
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
COMMERCIAL CANNABIS ACTIVITY, INTERIM ORDINANCE
December 16, 2015
Page 2
1996" or the "CUA ") and the Legislature's enactment in 2004 of the Medical Marijuana Program
( "MMP ") (codified as California Health and Safety Code Section 11362.7 et seq.), which clarified
the scope of Proposition 215.
The intent of Proposition 215 was to allow persons to use medical cannabis for medical purposes
without fear of criminal prosecution. Marijuana nevertheless remains a Schedule 1 Drug under
the Federal Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. A Schedule 1 Drug is one that
has a high potential for abuse, has no accepted medical use in treatment, and is not accepted as
safe under medical supervision. Because it is classified as a Schedule 1 Drug, Marijuana (also
known as cannabis) is unlawful without exemptions under federal law for any person to cultivate,
manufacture, distribute, dispense, or possess with intent.
The limited immunity from specified state marijuana laws provided by the CUA and MMP does
not confer a land use right or the right to create or maintain a public nuisance. In City of Riverside
v. Inland Empire Patients Health and Wellness Center, Inc., 56 CalAth 729 (2013), the California
Supreme Court held that "[n]othing in the CUA or the MMP expressly or impliedly limits the
inherent authority of a local jurisdiction, by its own ordinances, to regulate the use of its land...."
Additionally, in Maral v. City of Live Oak (2013) 221 Cal.AppAth 975, the Court of Appeal held
that "there is no right — and certainly no constitutional right — to cultivate medical marijuana...."
The Court in Maral affirmed the ability of a local governmental entity to prohibit the cultivation of
marijuana under its land use authority. Furthermore, in Kirby v. County of Fresno, No. F070056
(Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 1, 2015), the Court of Appeal held that the CUR and the MMP do not preempt
local land use authority to ban the operation of marijuana dispensaries and the cultivation and
storage of medical marijuana.
The City expressly banned the dispensing of marijuana from any facility or location, whether fixed
or mobile, through adoption of a development code restriction in March 2007. Cultivation and
delivery were not specifically addressed, but the City has a permissive zoning ordinance which
means that activities not expressly permitted are prohibited. Section 17.30.020.0 of the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code currently provides that all land uses that are not listed in the zoning
district tables are not allowed, except as otherwise provided for in this title. Commercial cannabis
activities, including but not limited to cultivation and delivery of cannabis are not listed in the
zoning district tables. The cultivation of cannabis is therefore already prohibited under the City's
permissive zoning regulations. In light of the recent enactment of the MMRSA and its March 1
deadline for adopting a cultivation restriction, it is important that Rancho Cucamonga explicitly
restate our regulations to expressly prohibit cannabis activities including delivery, cultivation, and
dispensing to prevent public confusion.
Prohibiting cannabis activities is necessary to prevent the negative effects of marijuana
cultivation, processing and distribution activities, including offensive odors, illegal sales and
distribution of marijuana, trespassing, theft, violent robberies and robbery attempts, fire hazards,
and problems associated with mold, fungus, and pests. Commercial medical marijuana activities,
as well as cultivation for personal medical use as allowed by the CUA and MMP, can therefore
adversely affect the health, safety, and well -being of City residents. The unlawful sale, use, or
both of marijuana in the vicinity of lawful medical marijuana dispensaries occasionally occurs.
Because large amounts of cash are often present at such dispensaries, they can also become
the target of violent criminal activity.
Mobile dispensaries and delivery services are also targets for armed robbery because they carry
cash and cannabis that can be sold on the black market. Recent reports of armed robberies
include: On August 20, 2015, police in the City of Monterey reported that a man held a medical
yzK
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
COMMERCIAL CANNABIS ACTIVITY, INTERIM ORDINANCE
December 16, 2015
Page 3
marijuana deliver driver at gunpoint and fled with marijuana and cash. On December 22, 2014,
police in the City of San Bernardino reported that a customer robbed a mobile dispensary driver
at gunpoint, which led to an hours -long standoff with police. Cannabis delivery services also
increase the risk that children and minors will gain access at the point of delivery.
Marijuana cultivation also requires the use of limited water resources. In a study released March
18, 2015, California Department of Fish and Wildlife scientists noted that the amount of water
used to cultivate cannabis plants is unknown but that it is considered a high water -use plant.
Marijuana cultivators also often use fertilizers, pesticides, and other chemical or killing agents that
would negatively impact natural resources in the City.
The indoor growing and cultivation of marijuana, often unattended, has potential to cause harm
to persons and property in that the use of high wattage grow lights and excessive use of electricity
increases the risk of fire which presents a distinct risk of harm to the building and its occupants.
Furthermore, as marijuana plants begin to flower, and for a period of two months or more, the
plants produce a strong, unique odor, offensive to many people, and detectable far beyond
property boundaries if grown outdoors. This odor can have the effect of encouraging theft by
alerting persons to the location of the valuable plants, and creating a risk of burglary, robbery, or
armed robbery of the plants and creating the potential for violent acts related to such criminal
activity.
For these reasons, allowing cannabis activities in the City of Rancho Cucamonga would require
the City to make use of its law enforcement resources to monitor and prevent their negative
effects. There are already many competing demands on a limited law enforcement staff and
budget. The total banning of cannabis activities as has been in place since 2007 would continue
to restrain the demands of these activities on law enforcement resources and allow them to be
deployed in other ways to assure the health and welfare of the community.
While the current ordinance prohibits dispensing of marijuana, and through its permissive nature
prohibits cultivation and delivery, it is recommended that the City Council enact the attached
Ordinance 884 reaffirming the ban on cannabis activities.
The draft Ordinance includes findings in support of the conclusion that there is a current and
immediate threat to the public health, safety and welfare presented by the recent enactment and
January 1, 2016 effective date of the MMRSA, the potential for commercial cannabis activities,
including but not limited to deliveries and cultivation of marijuana for personal medical use, and
the March 1, 2016 deadline under the MMRSA.
If adopted by the City Council, the Ordinance would be enacted as an urgency ordinance pursuant
to Government Code Section 65858 and take effect immediately upon adoption. Under
Government Code Section 65858, the Ordinance would expire, and the prohibition established
by the Ordinance would terminate, forty -five (45) days after the date of adoption unless extended
by the City Council pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858. Therefore, if the
Council adopts the Ordinance, staff will present a second ordinance to extend the interim
prohibition in January 2016.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
COMMERCIAL CANNABIS ACTIVITY, INTERIM ORDINANCE
December 16, 2015
Page
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The project is deemed bube exempt from the provisions of
the California Environmental ClVa|Uv Act /CEOA\ pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) because it can
be seen with certainty that there is no probability that the proposed urgency ordinance will have
a significant effect oOthe environment because the ordinance will impose greater limitations on
development in the {|ity, and will thereby serve to eliminate potentially significant adverse
environmental impacts.
Respectfully submitted,
�
Jeffrey A. Bloom
Deputy City Manager, Economic and Community Development
Attachments: Interim Ordinance
P251
AN INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PROHIBITING ALL
COMMERCIAL CANNABIS USES IN THE CITY, INCLUDING
DELIVERIES, PROHIBITING ALL MEDICAL MARIJUANA
CULTIVATION, INCLUDING CULTIVATION FOR MEDICAL
USE BY A QUALIFIED PATIENT OR PRIMARY
CAREGIVER, AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF
A. Recitals.
1. In 1996, the voters of the State of California approved Proposition 215
(codified as California Health and Safety Code Section 11362.5, and entitled "The
Compassionate Use Act of 1996" or the "CUX). The intent of Proposition 215 was to
allow persons to use medical cannabis for medical purposes without fear of criminal
prosecution. It provides, however, that "nothing in this section shall be construed to
supersede legislation prohibiting persons from engaging in conduct that endangers
others, or to condone the diversion of marijuana for non-medical purposes."
2. In 2004, the Legislature enacted the Medical Marijuana Program ("MMP")
(codified as California Health and Safety Code Section 11362.7 et seq.) to clarify the
scope of Proposition 215. Amendments to the MMP in 2010 and 2011 confirm that cities
and counties have the authority to "[a]dopt local ordinances that regulate the location,
operation, or establishment of a medical marijuana cooperative or collective" and to
enforce such ordinances.
3. On October 9, 2015, Governor Brown signed Assembly Bill No. 243,
Assembly Bill No. 266, and Senate Bill 643 into law, which collectively are known as the
Medical Marijuana Regulation and Safety Act (hereinafter "MMRSA"). The MMRSA sets
up a State licensing scheme for commercial medical marijuana uses, while protecting
local control by requiring that all such businesses must have a local license or permit to
operate in addition to a State license. The MMRSA allows the City to completely prohibit
commercial medical marijuana activities, but requires cities to adopt regulations or
prohibitions on the cultivation of cannabis either expressly or otherwise under the
principles of permissive zoning, or the State will become the sole licensing authority
effective March 1, 2016. The MMRSA also contains language that requires delivery
services to be expressly prohibited by local ordinance, if a city wishes to do so.
4. Marijuana nevertheless remains a Schedule 1 Drug under the Federal
Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. A Schedule 1 Drug is one that has
a high potential for abuse, has no accepted medical use in treatment, and is not accepted
as safe under medical supervision. Because it is classified as a Schedule 1 Drug,
Marijuana (also known as cannabis) is unlawful without exemptions under federal law for
any person to cultivate, manufacture, distribute, dispense, or possess with intent.
P252
5. The limited immunity from specified state marijuana laws provided by the
CUA and MMP does not confer a land use right or the right to create or maintain a public
nuisance. In City of Riverside v. Inland Empire Patients Health and Wellness Center,
Inc., 56 CalAth 729 (2013), the California Supreme Court held that "[n]othing in the CUA
or the MMP expressly or impliedly limits the inherent authority of a local jurisdiction, by its
own ordinances, to regulate the use of its land...." Additionally, in Maral v. City of Live
Oak (2013) 221 Cal.AppAth 975, the Court of Appeal held that "there is no right — and
certainly no constitutional right — to cultivate medical marijuana...." The Court in Maral
affirmed the ability of a local governmental entity to prohibit the cultivation of marijuana
under its land use authority. Furthermore, in Kirby v. County of Fresno, No. F070056
(Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 1, 2015), the Court of Appeal held that the CUA and the MMP do not
preempt local land use authority to ban the operation of marijuana dispensaries and the
cultivation and storage of medical marijuana.
6. Some California cities have reported negative effects of marijuana
cultivation, processing and distribution activities, including offensive odors, illegal sales
and distribution of marijuana, trespassing, theft, violent robberies and robbery attempts,
fire hazards, and problems associated with mold, fungus, and pests.
7. Marijuana cultivation requires the use of limited water resources. In a study
released March 18, 2015, California Department of Fish and Wildlife scientists noted that
the amount of water used to cultivate cannabis plants is unknown but that it is considered
a high water -use plant. Marijuana cultivators also often use fertilizers, pesticides, and
other chemical or killing agents that would negatively impact natural resources in the City.
8. The indoor growing and cultivation of marijuana, often unattended, has
potential to cause harm to persons and property in that the use of high wattage grow
lights and excessive use of electricity increases the risk of fire which presents a distinct
risk of harm to the building and its occupants. Furthermore, as marijuana plants begin to
flower, and for a period of two months or more, the plants produce a strong, unique odor,
offensive to many people, and detectable far beyond property boundaries if grown
outdoors. This odor can have the effect of encouraging theft by alerting persons to the
location of the valuable plants, and creating a risk of burglary, robbery, or armed robbery
of the plants and creating the potential for violent acts related to such criminal activity.
9. Commercial medical marijuana activities, as well as cultivation for personal
medical use as allowed by the CUA and MMP, can adversely affect the health, safety,
and well -being of City residents. The unlawful sale, use, or both of marijuana in the
vicinity of lawful medical marijuana dispensaries occasionally occurs. Because large
amounts of cash are often present at such dispensaries, they can also become the target
of violent criminal activity.
10. Mobile dispensaries and delivery services are targets for armed robbery
because they carry cash and cannabis that can be sold on the black market. Recent
reports of armed robberies include: On August 20, 2015, police in the City of Monterey
reported that a man held a medical marijuana delivery driver at gunpoint and fled with
marijuana and cash. On December 22, 2014, police in the City of San Bernardino
P253
reported that a customer robbed a mobile dispensary driver at gunpoint, which led to an
hours -long standoff with police. Cannabis delivery services also increase the risk that
children and minors will gain access at the point of delivery.
11. Prohibiting commercial cannabis activities, including but not limited to
cultivation and deliveries for medical purposes, is proper and necessary to avoid the risks
of criminal activity, degradation of the natural environment, noxious smells and indoor
electrical fire hazards that may result from such activities. Commercial cannabis activities
in the City of Rancho Cucamonga would require the City to use limited resources to
monitor and prevent their negative effects.
12. Section 17.30.020.0 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code currently
provides that all land uses that are not listed in the zoning district tables are not allowed,
except as otherwise provided for in this title. Commercial cannabis activities, including
but not limited to cultivation and delivery of cannabis are not listed in the zoning district
tables. Commercial cannabis activities, including but not limited to cultivation and
delivery, are therefore currently prohibited under the City's permissive zoning regulations.
The City Council nevertheless finds it necessary to expressly prohibit such uses in all
zones throughout the City to prevent possible confusion in light of the recent enactment
of the MMRSA and the establishment and operation of commercial cannabis activities.
13. Based upon the facts set forth in the Recital above, the City Council finds
that there is a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety and welfare
presented by the recent enactment and January 1, 2016 effective date of the MMRSA,
the potential establishment and operation of commercial cannabis activities, including but
not limited to deliveries and cultivation of marijuana for personal medical use, and the
March 1, 2016 deadline under the MMRSA. Therefore, the City Council finds that the
immediate preservation of the public health, safety, and welfare requires that this
Ordinance be enacted as an urgency ordinance pursuant to Government Code Section
65858 and take effect immediately upon adoption, and its urgency is hereby declared.
14. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council hereby ordains as follows:
Section 1. The City Council finds that the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A,
of this Ordinance are true and correct.
Section 2. Definitions.
Hereinafter in this Ordinance the following words shall have the meanings set forth
below, unless the context otherwise requires:
"Cannabis" shall have that meaning set forth in the MMRSA, as the same may be
amended from time to time, and shall include all parts of the plant cannabis sativa
linnaeus, cannabis indica, or cannabis ruderalis, whether growing or not; the seeds
P254
thereof; the resin, whether crude or purified, extracted from any part of the plant; and
every compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of the plant, its
seeds, or resin. "Cannabis" also means the separated resin, whether crude or purified,
obtained from marijuana. "Cannabis" also means marijuana as defined by Section 11018
of the Health and Safety Code as enacted by Chapter 1407 of the Statutes of 1972.
"Cannabis" does not include the mature stalks of the plant, fiber produced from the stalks,
oil or cake made from the seeds of the plant, any other compound, manufacture, salt,
derivative, mixture, or preparation of the mature stalks (except the resin extracted
therefrom), fiber, oil, or cake, or the sterilized seed of the plant which is incapable of
germination. For the purpose of this Ordinance, "cannabis" does not mean "industrial
hemp" as defined by Section 81000 of the Food and Agricultural Code or Section 11018.5
of the Health and Safety Code.
"Commercial cannabis activity" shall have that meaning set forth in the MMRSA,
as the same may be amended from time to time, and shall include cultivation, possession,
manufacture, processing, storing, laboratory testing, labeling, transporting, or distribution,
as those terms are defined or used in the MMRSA, and /or sale, of medical cannabis or a
medical cannabis product, except as provided in Section 7 of Senate Bill No. 643 (2015-
2016).
"Cooperative" shall mean two or more persons collectively or cooperatively
cultivating, using, transporting, possessing, administering, delivering, or making available
medical cannabis, with or without compensation.
"Cultivation" shall have the same set forth in the MMRSA, as the same may be
amended from time to time, and shall include any activity involving the planting, growing,
harvesting, drying, curing, grading, or trimming of cannabis.
"Delivery" shall have the same meaning as set forth in the MMRSA, as the same
may be amended from time to time, and shall include the commercial transfer of medical
cannabis or medical cannabis products from a dispensary, up to an amount determined
by the bureau to a primary caregiver or qualified patient as defined in Section 11362.7 of
the Health and Safety Code, or a testing laboratory. "Delivery" also includes the use by
a dispensary of any technology platform owned and controlled by the dispensary, or
independently licensed under the MMRSA, that enables qualified patients or primary
caregivers to arrange for or facilitate the commercial transfer by a licensed dispensary of
medical cannabis or medical cannabis products.
"Dispensary" shall have the same meaning as set forth in the MMRSA, as the same
may be amended from time to time, and shall include any facility where medical cannabis,
medical cannabis products, or devices for the use of medical cannabis or medical
cannabis products are offered, either individually or in any combination, for retail sale,
including an establishment that delivers, pursuant to express authorization by local
ordinance, medical cannabis and medical cannabis products as part of a retail sale.
"Dispensary" shall also include "dispensary" as defined in Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code Section 19.1304.020, and a cooperative as defined herein.
P255
"Medical cannabis," "medical cannabis product," or "cannabis product" shall have
the same meanings as set forth in the MMRSA, as the same may be amended from time
to time.
"Medical Marijuana Regulation and Safety Act" or "MMRSA" shall collectively mean
the Medical Marijuana Regulation and Safety Act as contained, codified, enacted, and
signed into law on October 9, 2015, as Assembly Bill No. 243, Assembly Bill No. 266, and
Senate Bill 643, as the same may be amended from time to time.
"Primary caregiver" shall have the same meaning as set forth in Health and Safety
Code § 11362.7, as the same may be amended from time to time.
"Qualifying patient" or "Qualified patient" shall have the same meaning as set forth
in Health and Safety Code § 11362.7, as the same may be amended from time to time.
Section 3. Prohibition.
a. Commercial cannabis activities of any type or nature are expressly
prohibited in all zones and all specific plan areas in the City. No person shall establish,
operate, maintain, conduct or allow a commercial cannabis activity anywhere within the
City. No application for a building permit, conditional use permit, business license, or any
other entitlement authorizing the establishment, operation, maintenance, development,
or construction any commercial cannabis activity, shall be approved during the term of
this Ordinance.
b. To the extent not already prohibited by subsection A above, delivery of
medical cannabis and /or medical cannabis products originating in the City, terminating in
the City, or both is expressly prohibited everywhere in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
No person shall conduct or perform any delivery of any medical cannabis or medical
cannabis product, which delivery either originates in the City, terminates in the City, or
both.
C. This section is intended to prohibit all activities for which a State license is
required pursuant to the MMRSA. Accordingly, the City shall not issue any permit, license
or other entitlement for any activity for which a State license is required under the
MMRSA.
d. Cultivation of cannabis for commercial or non - commercial purposes,
including cultivation by a qualified patient or a primary caregiver, is expressly prohibited
in all zones and all specific plan areas in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. No person,
including a qualified patient or primary caregiver, shall cultivate any amount of cannabis
in the City, even for medical purposes.
e. Nothing in this Ordinance, or its adoption, shall be deemed to affect any
other prohibitions or regulations relating to marijuana contained in the Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code. In the event of any conflict between said Chapter and this
Ordinance, the most restrictive provision shall govern. Nothing in this Ordinance shall be
deemed to affect or excuse any violation of the Municipal Code.
P256
Section 4. Nothing in this Ordinance shall be interpreted to the effect that the City's
permissive zoning scheme allows any use not specifically listed as permitted therein. The
City Council hereby finds that notwithstanding any provision of the Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code to the contrary, commercial cannabis activities, including but not limited
to cultivation and manufacture, are not allowed land uses under Title 17 or any other
provision of this Code. For example and without any limitation, the terms "agriculture"
and "manufacturing" in Title 17 have always excluded and shall continue to exclude
cannabis cultivation and manufacture, respectively, as those terms are defined and used
in Title 17.
Section 5. Public Nuisance. Any use or condition caused, or permitted to exist, in
violation of any provision of this Ordinance shall be, and hereby is declared to be, a public
nuisance and may be summarily abated by the City pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure
Section 731 or by any other remedy available to the City.
Section 6. Penalty. Violation of any provision of this Ordinance shall constitute a
misdemeanor and shall be punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars
($1,000) or by imprisonment for a period not to exceed six (6) months, or by both such
fine and imprisonment. Each and every day such a violation exists shall constitute a
separate and distinct violation of this Ordinance. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing
in this Ordinance shall authorize a criminal prosecution or arrest prohibited by Health and
Safety Code section 11362.7 1, et seq.
Section 7. Civil Penalties. In addition to any other enforcement permitted by this
Ordinance, the City Attorney may bring a civil action for injunctive relief and civil penalties
against any person or entity that violates this Ordinance. In any civil action brought
pursuant to this Ordinance, a court of competent jurisdiction may award reasonable
attorneys fees and costs to the prevailing party.
Section 8. CEQA. This Ordinance is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA
Guidelines section 15305, minor alterations in land use, and section 15061(b)(3) which is
the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing
a significant effect on the environment, and CEQA does not apply where it can be seen
with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity may have a significant effect on
the environment. Provisions of the City's permissive zoning ordinance already prohibit
all uses that are being expressly prohibited by this Ordinance. Therefore, this Ordinance
has no impact on the physical environment as it will not result in any changes.
Section 9. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause,
phrase or portion of this Ordinance, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional
by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares
that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, subdivision,
sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more
sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be
declared invalid or unconstitutional.
P257
Section 10. Term. This Ordinance is adopted as an urgency, interim ordinance and
shall take effect immediately. This Ordinance shall expire, and the prohibition established
hereby shall terminate, forty-five (45) days after the date of adoption unless extended by
the City Council pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858.
Section 11. The City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this Ordinance.
ATTEST:
Janice C. Reynolds
City Clerk
L. Dennis Michael
Mayor
1, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the , 2015, and was
passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held
on , 2015, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
FWAI .0 F&
MFWAII : I
P258
CITY CLERKS OFFICE
Date: December 9, 2015
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
John R. Gillison, City Manager
From: Jana Cook, Community Improvement Manager
Subject: AN .ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AMENDING THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO
EXTEND THE TIME LIMIT FOR APPEALING ADMINISTRATIVE
CITATIONS AND APPLYING FOR HARDSHIP WAIVERS TO 30 DAYS
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended the City Council adopt the attached ordinance which extends the time period for
a recipient to appeal an Administrative Citation or submit a waiver due to financial hardship to 30
days from the current 20 day limit.
BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS
Earlier this year, Council adopted an ordinance which changed the time frame for payment of an
Administrative Fine from 20 days to 30 days. Some associated sections calling for 20 day time
periods to file an appeal or submit a financial hardship waiver were overlooked and the discrepancy
may cause confusion with the public. This ordinance makes the time frames for filing an appeal,
submitting a financial hardship waiver or making a payment a consistent 30 days.
Adopting this ordinance will have no financial cost to the City, but will clarify the requirements and
extend the time period for a recipient of an Administrative Citation to exercise the right to due
process.
Respectfully submitted,
Jana Cook, Community Improvement Manager
/jc
ORDINANCE NO. 885
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCBOCUCAMONGA
AMENDING THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL
C00B T0 EXTEND THE TIME LIMIT FOR APPEALING
ADMINISTRATIVE CITATIONS AND APPLYING FOR
HARDSHIP WAIVERS IO30DAYS
The City Council of the City Of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows:
Section 1. Section |.l2'||O.Bo[ the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Codoiabereby
amended to read as follows:
'B. Any responsible person desiring an administrative hearing shall file with
the office of the city clerk u completed [cqucg for hearing form and the
administrative Duc or completed hardship waiver [omn pursuant to this chapter
within 30 days from the du1c of service of the administrative citation. In the event
of any dispute as to the du1c of filing, the du1c indicated on u file stamped copy in
the office of the city clerk or u city clerk-file s1unlpcd copy in the possession of the
responsible party yhuU control. The responsible person's failure to file the request
for hearing form and the fine or hardship waiver form within 30 days of the date of
service of the udnzniabu1ivc citation shall constitute u waiver of the ri�bt to u
Section 2. 6euiou 1. 12.120.A of the Rancho Cocunzoogu Municipal Code is hereby
amended to read as follows:
^A. Any responsible pc,aou who requests an administrative hearing and who is
financially unable to deposit the administrative fine as provided in this chapter may
[i]c a request for an advance deposit hardship waiver. The request shall be filed
with the finance department on an advance deposit hardship waiver application
form, available from the finance department, no later than 30 days after service 0f
the m]ndniabu1ivc citation. The responsible pcle0n`s failure to file u completed
form, with all supporting documents, within 30 days oDcr service of the
udodniai[u|ivc citation shall constitute uvvuivc{ of the right to receive u hardship
waiver. In the event of any dispute as to the date of filing, the date indicated on u
file stamped copy in the finance department or a finance department-file stamped
copy in possession of the responsible party shall onoto0|."
Section 3. This Ordinance shall only apply W citations issued after its effective date.
This Ordinance shall not affect any actions or proceedings that began before the effective date of
this Ordinance or any fines and penalties due and unpaid at the effective date of this Ordinance.
Section 4. Severability. The City Council declares that, should any provision, section,
paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court
action in u court of oocupcUcui jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the
remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences and words of this Ordinance shall remain in
full force and effect.
//za1 -0001\1 864320v/.d^
P260
Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance.
ATTEST:
Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
1, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Z-�
Rancho Cucamonga held on the 2015, and was passed at a regular meeting
of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on 2015, by the
following vote:
C�
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS:
1123 1 -0001\1 864320vl.doc
P261
STAFF REPORT
ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT o
Date: December 16, 2015 RANCHO
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council CUCAMONGA
John R. Gillison, City Manager
From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services /City Engineer
By: Fred Lyn, Utilities Division Manager
Tiffany I. Cooper, Management Analyst 11
Subject: DISCUSSION OF RESIDENTIAL MONTHLY PARKING PERMIT FEE FOR THE
_ . ...... _..— MEIROLINK STATION
RECOMMENDATION,
It is recommended that the City Council discuss the possibility of revising the current Metrolink monthly
permit parking fee for Rancho Cucamonga residents with any recommended changes to be made at the
City's next fee schedule update proposed in January 2016.
BACKGROUND.
Paid parking for the Metrolink station was implemented on July 1, 2014. Daily and monthly parking fees
were determined based on what was "fair and reasonable" compared to other neighboring cities currently
charging for parking (Cities of Covina and Baldwin Park), along with the current budget for operations
and maintenance, and any future improvements to the lots. The City Council approved the current
monthly fees of $25 for Rancho Cucamonga residents and $30 for non - residents at the City Council
meeting on May 21, 2014.
ANALYSIS.
Staff considered the following as a means to determine the parking rates of the paid parking program at
the Metrolink station: 1) parking rates at other cities along the same Metrolink line,
City
Resident
Non - Resident
Monthly Fee
Monthly Fee
City of Covina
$20.00
$45.00
City of Baldwin
$10.00
$30.00
Park
2) "fair and reasonable" fees based on the survey results from Metrolink commuters, and 3) the
operations and maintenance budget for the Metrolink station lots. At the conclusion of the first year of
the program, the revenue generated at the Metrolink station was approximately $276,000; while the
annual maintenance budget was approximately $238,000; generating approximately $38,000 surplus in
revenue.
P262
City Council Staff Report
December 16, 2015
Page 2
Should the City Council be interested in reducing the Metrolink monthly permit parking fee for Rancho
Cucamonga residents, a breakdown of the analysis utilizing FY 2015 permit usage of residents and non-
residents, FY 2015 revenues and FY 2016 estimated expenditures is shown in the table below.
Resident Monthly
Non - Resident
Revenues
Expenditures
Operating
Fee
Monthly Fee
(FY 2015
(FY 2016
Income /
Actuals )
Estimated )
Reserves
$25.00
$30.00
$276,000
$246,000
$30,000
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
$20.00
$30.00
$258,000
$246,000
$12,000
$17.50
$30.00
$246,000
$246,000
$0
$15.00
$30.00
$234,000
$246,000
($12,000
Please note that in the FY 2016 budget, new security cameras will be added that have an estimated
annual maintenance cost of approximately $8,000, which has already been added to the FY 2016
expenditures. As the table indicates, at a reduced rate of $20.00 per month, all expenditures, including
increases are accounted for with an approximate 5% contingency remaining. In addition, it is possible
that the reduction will result in increased resident riders, further strengthening the bottom line. No
planned or forecasted capital improvements will be affected by a reduction of $5.00 per month in monthly
residential permit parking fee.
CONCLUSION
Should the City Council direct staff to move forward with reducing the Metrolink monthly parking permit
fees for Rancho Cucamonga residents, it is recommended that the City Council reduce the Resident
Monthly Fee from $25.00 /month to $20.00 /month, which would still provide sufficient funds for the
operations and maintenance of the Metrolink lots, as well as a small 5% contingency reserve for any
unforeseen changes that may occur at the lots.
Respectfully submitted,
ark euer
Director of Engineering Services /City Engineer
P263
• ,CDT •►
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the City Council Community Services
Subcommittee's recommendation to appoint Otis Greer to serve a four-year term on the Park
and Recreation Commission.
r_,T_IT44Xej
Two terms were set to expire at the end of December for the Park and Recreation
Commission. The first seat was held by Jim Hansen who tendered his resignation early in
August and the other was that of Patricia Morris who has served on the Commission since
2008. The City Council Community Services Subcommittee, consisting of Mayor Michael
and Mayor Pro Tern Spagnolo, met on September 21st to discuss filling the immediate
vacancy left by Mr. Hansen and concurred with conducting a recruitment. The recruitment
took place, applications were accepted and interviews held on November 5th. Based on the
Subcommittee's recommendation, Peter Villegas was appointed by the City Council at their
meeting held December 2nd to fill Mr. Hansen's seat. During that time, Ms. Morris made the
decision to not request re-appointment. Based on the recent interviews held and number of
qualified applicants, the Subcommittee concurred that candidate Otis Greer should fill the
newest vacancy. For those unfamiliar with Mr. Greer, he is currently employed by the County
of San Bernardino as a Government Relations Analyst and also served for many years as
the Director of Community Affairs for the Auto Club Speedway. He also brings with him years
of civic involvement including his service on various boards and foundations. The
Subcommittee feels that Mr. Greer would be a positive, contributing addition to the City team
and the Commission and they will bring their recommendation for his appointment to the
December 16th City Council meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
Nettie Nielsen
Community Services Director