Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout16-067 - Resolutions RESOLUTION NO. 16-067 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2015-00887, TO 1) TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS OF MULTIPLE PARCELS WITHIN THE CITY, GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG FOOTHILL BOULEVARD NEAR THE INTERSECTIONS OF EAST AVENUE, ETIWANDA AVENUE, HAVEN AVENUE, AND VINEYARD AVENUE, AND NEAR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND CANDLEWOOD STREET, FROM THEIR EXISTING DESIGNATIONS OF GENERAL COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL PARK, OR OFFICE (DEPENDING ON THE PARCEL) TO MIXED USE; 2)TO REVISE TABLES LU-1, DELETE TABLES LU-3 THROUGH LU-8, AND LU-10 THROUGH LU-14 OF THE GENERAL PLAN THAT DESCRIBE THE USES AND DEVELOPMENT RANGES PERMITTED WITHIN EACH AREA DESIGNATED FOR MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AND TO CORRECT NUMBERING OF TABLE LU-9; 3) REVISE TABLES LU- 15 THROUGH LU-18 THAT SUMMARIZE AND DESCRIBE THE BUILD-OUT CAPACITY FOR EACH LAND USE CLASSIFICATION THROUGHOUT THE CITY; 4) REVISE FIGURES LU-2 AND LU-3 OF THE GENERAL PLAN THAT IDENTIFY THE (EXISTING AND ADDED) LOCATIONS OF THE PARCELS THAT ARE DESIGNATED FOR MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT; 5) REVISE TEXT ASSOCIATED WITH THESE TABLES AND FIGURES; AND 6) TO CORRECT ANY TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS AND OMISSIONS WITHIN THE EXISTING TEXT ASSOCIATED WITH THESE TABLES AND FIGURESAND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APNS: 0207-211-05, 0207-211-42 THROUGH -46, 0208-353-01 THROUGH -03, 1100-031-06, -07; 1100-041-01 THROUGH -03, 1090-601-04, -06 THROUGH -08, 1090-601-20 AND -21, 1100-161-01 THROUGH -03, 0229-311-14 AND 45, 1100-191-04, AND 1100-201-03, -04, -06, AND -07 A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00887 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On May 11, 2016, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date by recommending approval of the application to the City Council for final action by adoption of their Resolution No. 16-33. 3. On June 15, 2016 the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded the hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Resolution No. 16-067 - Page 1 of 49 B. Resolution. NOW,THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above- referenced public hearing June 15, 2016, including written and oral staff reports,together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to properties located within the City; and b. The 2010 General Plan, adopted May 19, 2010, currently designates multiple parcels as Mixed Use. These parcels are generally grouped in thirteen (13) "Mixed Use Areas" at various locations in the City as shown in Figure LU-3 of the General Plan. The majority of these Mixed Use Areas are generally located along Foothill Boulevard and near intersections of streets with major, north-south streets such as Archibald Avenue, Haven Avenue, and Milliken Avenue; and c. The subject parcels are generally located along Foothill Boulevard near the intersections of East Avenue, Etiwanda Avenue, Haven Avenue, and Vineyard Avenue, and near the southeast corner of the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street, and are grouped into seven (7) proposed Mixed Use Areas; and d. The proposed amendment to the General Plan will change the land use designations of thirty(30) parcels, with a combined area of about 67 acres,within the City from their existing designations of General Commercial, Industrial Park, or Office(depending on the parcel)to Mixed Use. The subject parcels will be grouped into seven (7) MU Areas and will be numbered to follow the"list" of the thirteen (13)existing MU Areas, i.e. Mixed Use Areas#14—20, in the General Plan, Figures LU-2 (Land Use Plan) and LU-3 (Mixed Use Areas) (Attachments A, B, and C of this Resolution); and e. The proposed amendment to the General Plan will revise Tables LU-1, delete Tables LU-3 through LU-8, and LU-10 through LU-14 of the General Plan that describe the uses and development ranges permitted within each area designated for Mixed Use development and to correct numbering of Table LU-9 (as shown in Exhibit G of the Staff Report and Attachment C of this Resolution). These tables are proposed to be deleted as they do not provide enough flexibility for the City to determine the appropriate uses and range of development within the applicable MU Areas. Tables LU-2 and -9 will remain unchanged as they apply to MU Areas within, and are regulated by, separate Specific Plans; and f. The proposed amendment to the General Plan will revise Tables LU-15 through LU-18 that summarize and describe the build-out capacity for each land use classification throughout the City to account for the added MU Areas. These tables, and tables LU-19 through LU- 24, will also be renumbered to reflect the deletion of Tables LU-3 through LU-8, and LU-10 through LU-14 (Attachment D of this Resolution); and g. The proposed amendment to the General Plan will revise Figures LU-2 and LU-3 of the General Plan to identify the(existing and added) locations of the parcels that are designated for Mixed Use development. The parcels subject to the amendment are as shown in Attachments A, B, and C of this Resolution; and Resolution No. 16-067 - Page 2 of 49 h. The proposed amendment to the General Plan will revise text associated with the above-noted tables and figures as shown in Attachment D of this Resolution; and i. The proposed amendment to the General Plan will correct any typographical errors and omissions within the existing text associated with the above-noted tables and figures; and j. Amendments to the Zoning Map are not proposed at this time. The zoning designations of the parcels subject to this General Plan Amendment will remain unchanged. When a proposal for development within each new MU Area is submitted, the applicant will be required to submit an application for a Zoning Map Amendment for consistency with the General Plan. k. That the subject properties are suitable for mixed use development as most of them are located along Foothill Boulevard; are near a bus transit corridor and provide the best potential for transit-oriented development (TOD); are in close proximity to existing MU Areas; and/or the owners of the subject parcels have approached the City with proposals for development and have expressed interest in mixed use development; and I. That the proposed General Plan Amendment is internally consistent with the General Plan. The proposed amendment promotes the goals and policies of the Land Use Element of the General Plan as it will facilitate sustainable and attractive in-fill development that is accessible to pedestrians, bicycles, transit, and automobiles. Also, it will encourage the establishment of a • pedestrian-friendly Foothill Boulevard corridor that will facilitate transit use and provide a range of commercial destinations; and m. That the proposed General Plan Amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment. The proposed amendment affects the City as a whole and does not apply to a specific project site. Project-specific environmental analysis will be conducted by the City at the time applications for development are submitted for review. Future development of the subject parcels will be required to comply with the technical standards (building setbacks, building height, parking requirements, landscape coverage, etc.), design standards(architecture, site design, etc.), allowable land uses, and/or performance standards (noise, odors, hazardous materials, etc.) that apply to mixed use development. 3. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment as this amendment affects the City as a whole, does not apply to a specific project site, and project-specific environmental analysis will be conducted by the City at the time applications for development of each subject parcel (or parcels if grouped together) are submitted for review as required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based on that determination, a draft Negative Declaration was prepared. The State Clearinghouse number for the draft Negative Declaration is SCH#2016011059. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Negative Declaration. The comment period began on January 25, 2016 and concluded on February 23, 2016. Staff received a letter dated February 11, 2016 from the City of Upland indicating that they had "no comments at this time." On February 23, 2016, Staff received a • Resolution No. 16-067 - Page 3 of 49 comment letter from the City of Fontana which cited inadequacies in the description of the General Plan Amendment and the analysis of the environmental impacts of the project. The City of Fontana requested that the Initial Study be revised accordingly and be re-circulated for review. Staff subsequently revised the description of the project in the Initial Study. Staff concluded that the project is the adoption of an amendment to the General Plan and does not involve a site-specific project, and the adoption of the amendment does not preclude the review by the City of any project that results from this amendment. All parcels identified in the project description have land use designations that currently allow development. Except for APN: 1100-191-04, as discussed in the Staff Report for the May 11, 2016 Planning Commission public hearing, none of the subject parcels are currently designated as, for example, open space, where no (or very limited)development could occur. The amendment only changes the type of development that would be permitted. As development was expected to occur on those parcels, the overall impacts were considered in the Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan adopted in 2010. Additionally, under the Mixed Use land use designation, uses that would be allowed in future development projects would be comparable to the uses that are currently allowed within the existing land use designations. When an application for a site-specific project is submitted for review by the City, the City will conduct a project- and site-specific environmental assessment. The applicant will be required to submit environmental studies that analyze the impact(s) (if any)to,for example, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, noise levels, and transportation/traffic caused by the site-specific project. On a case-by-case review of each project, the appropriate environmental document will be prepared to address project-specific impacts. Based on the findings contained in the revised Initial Study, City staff determined that there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a revised draft Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Negative Declaration; and b. The City Council has reviewed the Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The City Council further finds that the Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council. Based on these findings, the City Council hereby recommends adopts the Negative Declaration; and c. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Negative Declaration, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council's recommendation is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 above, the City Council adopts General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00887 as shown in Attachments A, B, C and D incorporated hereto. 6. The Secretary to this Council shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Resolution No. 16-067 - Page 4 of 49 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15th day of June 2016. AYES: Alexarider, Kennedy, Michael, Spagnolo, Williams NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAINED: None 'Dear , L. Dennis Michael, M ATTEST: ?Mite/C. Z J C. Reynolds, City lerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City Council held on the 15th day of June 2016. Executed this 161h day of June 2016, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. • nice C. Reynolds, Cit Clerk Resolution No. 16-067 - Page 5 of 49 stia . d v . �, ro c c on v s„ . N d v 3 3 r" 114 a e <t f ` sli IA !, C_ U II i0 1 !ftC A G C15 'Ci C 1J to v 12 a PI 3 tPtyy yySysyCFh , 5 C .0 $ .c e i cTO � er Q .d 10 r y N Q r4 g Q ;Liz3 u.Q 0 O u.0 ilEilli it i1 e 1 _ 1V 3 W W .no. .ao-r �} 4 a In y Z Z V1 Z # . .. cHH1 i 0000000 N AV V 0 _. I .;7.1 •1'.tiJ { 414 F4 4.0 ri.. I 1 II IP / I 1 I —Ilif4N .."'•• c) t ',....,g L... t . . . .. , . . j. , - I liniflir zi -ii.tvilai I' d i %T1111 rte!° '•� : i t t 1 ) '\4 = iiikrii*, - 4 k rwwr rwa .w �, _" . ,:q.'Milo-,. •_6; -.Ty _ill:. , -,,' = . '4. V.4.1 f A ' NI 1 G--- " r.' iiiii i-'---F'V.....V. *T, • PALI *NAN • II: - irk4'Ar it . - . rizepowino AK - . if..,,__mi.rami _ _ BIM 1 .. am • . L ' illusx 0 rt,,NIE x IU..MI I- • r----.- DIEU V t - P !` 117.0aiffri...1121 .1 il i ` } Mil a Op lin. •,. • tottri i;- il 11111 I-, -,:-- 'M'". . ..",- , %Val -.1:.Z •--- 'I 1 .1. .L git -td • !,,.i. 132 I - a.4 g < Ns tar 1 \ _ ,'1r p t] M•r•.7 i s C 1 Al ATTACHMENT A ` Resolution No. 16-067 - Page 6 of 49 < ,-.i -. I.-, lo Ct.i.4.64E to o • v1:1 17 CI E $ I 3 3 SP w r7 /T3W W D W '1::$ i c w c c c 41 x lx:- eee .1 as '? o Is ai 2 c 2 1 di1 3:. . r g`Q o= ed .0 . 0 ce dj 1 #1 I 1g Y " 3 W 3 i3i8i g s S 288 s `m " n z z z 5 Iiia 11111 1111 III! a000e000 o= i u° J .ilwr4.Mt "I -v4-, . Myo. IT . 1 _ sib f It = , , . r Mhz Z.- -.. — tiljk-eir. 6... ,lit;\*..,,‘ ,t='....1/4'. : 8 -0 all el 11111111i lid.' fiLirci)Ili_i_c2 . 11-' "MI P-J, — - Itlittlikno--: ULA�u: � �. l'o- _ •was ... �, aww-ir r..� .111.G - ':, A' I swt 1,+ +*—..-. Vin; . i:r . 7. �„L.-`� ! - 0 - ....1011 . 1:114,00.Et -,--,t .,?)., 'i t'tir, .4. . • . ....-b- - _t_W fillf: .,•::4-t Itklit,- V,_IF. • ,„, 0 , 4 ill 1 ". :Ic"1"1" --,--i--.- L.- . :1_ . ._ii .:1,,,,,. -r,1 K .17, im lel il= tib � l -I - i ex Brairlill ft. li Iviik- ji.ilx-,. .tiiNt :I . ; F. E} _ 1.. -.-. 0-e4• \ I - i ' 3: II iii, 141 1Pilinj vv. _ ria _,,,,,--.:- _ ,...1 Ili ,11P-rfirek- o Irilbil '8'i - 14 1 ll� r '1 �. -- a/ t d• r t iI �' 1I 0 i Z a ATTACHMENT B Resolution No. 16-067 - Page 7 of 49 1 ' . . . - ' 4 ._ .4 ISMI : I-311:4Mailri 1. ,_ rimilsaa„„,.‘ridneit ..l ,,,. ...,_ ; 6.,.........a, mu low. - - ------- , ---, -- 'E./ I •---, . ) ' , 1., , , • rt ' ' ' 4' e ....% . ,,,,_. -...• .. r ' ": , . ... 4, . 7„4, „.... i. . • .\ .,....c.......16___ ,. 1 .4.- \ .. - • A II li . 1 1:' :,.. i '' A. .......1 , • • ;.1 • , Ili -• n - .. .... . ; ...... .. I.ii,,; • Miglit• i - ' ÷--,--- JA : ' ,.,... ,- .-:':',i,,.-:.::,./• ./7-'' 1.11c, ,iik iii • . - . 11 t ,.1 i•4. t; 4 \- • ' 'kilk \ • ‘111) .t.T.I..._ • ----..f. i T• :::_fia if•( ,.: I , i t1 1 '• ;:tt 1 1,1 ti-;.L.1 ',,'t- ' . '''''.."•- '4, " - .... I ; . :._ ...... . • .. , . - , ' 6 ••• IV. JfIvii. . , • , ... ,,,, . I ' . di r77 1 " )It,4.- -‘ 1 i;•' - . . • nit '-' -:---1 t r r• . • a .1 . ,..,, -., , • , - -- .. 77'F:5; '• _ -11( • .- , 1' i .. - ,-- . .., , i - _21_ ' *, .". -. k.L. , , 1. t.,..1.: . , . 1. _ .., • ,,.. ..., ... : . _.., ,....::: . , . ..R._ , _1,141 c• 1. • . -• -- - , - -. . . : I; (....... . mol ,, , 4.•,,,, . \•1 • - 7 • ../ A--• --•' :• . ,',h• 14. .. - :g1 ')..).1 ' 4-1 i P.• '''•41, k• --. 7 ,41' ." Ti,..,!_ti.._-,-., • _. . --.. . ,., . . - , _ ,.. - „. 7...-_-ri-T — .. .. 4-7 iiik --r- i ; • ;. .... • : . .— • -•- •— . .4 . - . , x•-•--4 7----"lril-iiii. -.111 llr: ..1 -., . ..• — I .. 1• ' . 14 • , 1 , L 0 1 i t I . 1,,, •.;.,.. 1., . • 4 It. I • . ... . ...4 --' 4 • 8 - ----77-iTi ' .. 1 • .....".:". k,,,;..:-. , er*----.' innki-- ;1 t i,.1 I .4_ • ' I..l.gx,, • 1 • .. •-.• 140, _ 4. ! ., 7't ' - 41.t. co;:•--' • • ' . -47: •• • -t • ..• ,,1 fi iltiltlint .., • ': . , , If • a:. ; : • I. riliiir Illir A 1..1; - !I i•- 1 • ..... ..'''. • A ,1 . g. Al;n .. •Lit-l...LIIILL111.ilail.f.4.-..k4•• • II A i. '! f".•••;..,. 1 t • '-'- - 1 .1 ,:Iytt-1 ,,,--, v. .• . •il 1.',•tt' ok" t.- ' ,... . , , ' ... , r Ilpf 1 .. .. __.. •;, II ' • ..1 5.11.1- ti.1.!......_ .,..., il ... _ .::i-A-: . '' • Ill --\, , --••••••-• ' !'I,0- ' ••I 1 . . '. I _ '0' . .., •• ... . • . 11; - I. • _. . . , ? /ois• M. .4 - ),, . .--,/ t • ;1 1) , '-- . .... '..., ' • , .. '1.41141110.11r" -eV, ' i :_ -- tip - , ... '7...-.1-- I Ns ! '-' _.„. .. ., . -- ...411( !1: .-714.• . --,---,:.- ,i. --, • ,.;•r i •4•1? ---7 ,...-. 1.0-4-/-. .• ....,_ --- ---.:41 .. .__,.. - • ar • '''''':t'\-,,,.&-;‘,'.\. k .N‘-'''''',4.....irt-...rat,•.,,.-.0..''', 414(' 5 4,l.--t,o,.r.•.-..-.--.....-)_'•.,,. ,.• 4 . I.. V14"' •' if1 ,•-•1• i _v,1. ..,.- •.., • ' 1--'-.•_7 / 14 . 1 r I .,, _%1.9_0•linit.?" i! i.t;i•'.. l!'. I, I_. .-.,..1.r-,•-l4 ki \ 12 ki , k . k tr---- t i. , 8 _!..., u 4 ..... ,.i nrt ----Si ' - • ..11{t 1 L • '--- al ' '..4 , • • -•m.- s .. • ; ,_ 1 cif• . . z . 4...---- - . , , . a- . , ii. .) 11 ,.. , . . 1 .. , _ , „t... , .,, . , .j I , .t.,: i , ,;-ar_.., • . .1 , 0 - a°4-7? i 11.7t....4.17t4Eillllitt..:: N., I.- ' • . *al/ '' 0.4 dr - r.,-• -.t - - ' - ,. , . . .tt •.•4 it,. Jive r sy• 1 e t . - •-••• * . ...6.. • ve.„ • ' glit...4.. .4, ••,‘,,,. . -. k ............, ` 11111161111111• 444:;•• . .,, _ . s .; _ - , , ,... . . /ill,111 on ft! it: toil . , w'n• 1,", ., 7. — "' ,/ '608V, _„ , .,• ,..iir:i.• • a el ‘. , •. . ' • •••• ATTACHMENT C ,e-istuti ., 4, , • ' IL • Stt I.7 C'` r �i j r gi. ' `' '1 / , Ir... • ( ,0,_ . j 1 I • / `1• NO a 114' twi . t• IbF r l : t T ) -:•', f.�►—�` e J T a'�\ • -. -1,, 1._ C 1 y,' `� `:�: r• 1 ii Aim_ t Lei I1-II, . G�..1�_, 'r • 1 1 51--•-, -� sv -74+.1.4. - - _-_-.....--"--••-'""-� I •,, =� • lirr_ 17 E.2 ,0 . • littri _ , .' . a:JP 7 .. idii >. i fl J i . • t. 1 t • ! � t r� 'jr) y` I q .• 1•. e 1 ., :ti ! ±p• :- ' •7 r� +/ - i 1 . ..Y��-{ `e • 4k %lit,i, .t I 1111lf:_.�. I I 4,r,•''.4 '.I •I 4I � i t_ 1 .I;:. 1: ••- 1t 1 PI— l . 1 $ � I _d I: - i ,• 1 I 4..f..,, Its;- I7(1:i -•^ `f'. k' l l 71 I',114 I.t ,`- f.1 ! er't �.,r` •tir�! / -}.. _ . i. II { •is•ttl 1. 7 I 7. - 'ft 3 !Wil1 .1 1 - -1 , Ilti h . .li_I•I11fill. i ri s:^•-9' 1 + !' ; :i4rl Ai 411.1141 — •. 1 ., ;t •-1 + 'JAM' •!f 1 } ` �„ , y^�I' i • 1s -- 1 • 11 • ']t:','t'. 1 l..t F G..: • J.,1 1 1'' 1 e ' j, y" �•_.. S. _.,, -1 .w II-"tl-c '..�Ai�, ti.77 i:1. .L •1 -•+ it �Y .. ti x'17:i•1 • +f i� • ,,7- �a Y7i i '� .'�: ::r�3c_..., . t•.'t :a •y. : pb.•1 -- ��o ._.��-•y• - J_• ti .Jif.' 1 - -• • • n ._ 4 �!'..�. . c , 1 wiFit . , . ........vio,,_„:" --, . •••••••,,,,i0orr.-.- i ��" 1 !4 �f +J / elf-f� . -,�s ." +'",^ , u •., « ....."Iftt: . `� 9 y �C .• i..a 7. 1'1.,1 a1 •e•.• F • r-, , ••... - - •.. , ,.„.,...,N, --',. 1.• • ,i, ' ''''' ... ... ..... • i ',.. ..1%,. 0 , I 1°.. ...' '‘,. -PI: °- 1 .-.1 f• ',I. L' Jr-. \ ' . • : of v-st1 *-- 1 •'. lik .\,-.%* .,.. ,..\ \'' - . , i 1,-17•-q _ % . 40. r . . - ‘ \ . • A. . d I , . i _ -- • A .,--.. \ ' 1 , :7; -e 1 Lir- . - . ,I, '. f• ,, •' -• .' -2 r 1 ,_.i-- .,, ' h.11) I. t' • I ,- _ °° I ,.. • •-.1 I t• a r.k. "!.......1-1i-- ' . •-\ ',`, \ • - "4" .,,, . •,..,,,, ,,,. .' k‘• "•*14) 1.7 ..: r 1 • . .''• . " 11 1-.1'14, f - JIII - 1 4 3 C. / 1 , .,,, • •L',,-.., \ • , I . -',1.' ,.''•,,.. '•.:\ N.,‘.4, • ' , •, s.......\. • ' , ,.. \ ./..,..-, ,. i - •-• 1 I 1-..... J ...,...nik- '-, 1,,,,i, 4A- • - r . • \--- ' "•,. ... / ,,!. ,.•writ c jili I ,... ,11 1 p •30 it 1,.- -,- ii 8 ,... , I ' .- t ;• - . a• -•` iiii. . , .,-,.._ ..._, A _ .:. , ,,..,"4 inia . 1 1.1 . . . .... ...• 11110 . -,',.., -,. '•.• ''' , _ • , `-. - •,,, .\\ . ,• -••• -,. . -, _ ',.. " N• . , • - - F711 ti , .-: . ./... --- . !I . .. ..; Yogi,ek • -.4 ,, „.. • 4,i,`..(-' , •to • .\ I., . 'il* !.4 iff A Oil , -.., , , , ..', ? ' :I, ' . - , . • '••••-, dig . -. - \ : \:, • 1'. • s• t ---IL ,-,.1 .......? . a ' •vr-I / , , .. ., 010 • ,,, . ___ __...1.. .. ?., ,: •. _an_ , , _ \ ''';•• ''•••‘ 4. ' ':°"( • - -. ''''''''' '•• • ' : C' I. /41t., ':/• : .-'):. '. ... / •r ., ... * "Ne--. '-,. '..,,-• 4. . 1 ra ' I ti„ \ ,... ,t, .. • :.: •:Wit N.: . i„•• . , .4- . , • 1%,,, ::.,... ,..- ..i A il . !- 11 I: J. 4 'f.. ...- • ' ';'•;/4/40,/-%% ha........ . ' ..'I° - ' . .. ." N. - . . .:... •'.` - .- t' ' "r- • - t t.,. 4\ s, .Al ' ) 111r10111-1.4 9 ' • , . ,- -qr. - ) \ •••, • ; "-• 7 '-7\ s, , ., , . . ,..., . - - ...t k ''..-.. • . 4 i ' ' 111%34~. 1' _. •I , I •0, 0 , t A . .4 44,• "6141&4 • - ..'-I'!'''. ... ..a. Tr. . ..4 L ,'... - • ,' ' ''''+,,, •, '', -- :‘"Zai4.,,,,,4* • , . i '1.' ‘!.1- . 1 rialT _,,,, .. • • ,',‘ vi .• \ 0, .. , .. 'N''‘'‘''. .% \ ' 2 • ... '' 1 1 . .. ...- . . . J L ilvr: . ril Irillk lin 1 • -.', . . -Lt.; ' • - , 1- •'' \\ \ .‘•, p. '.. AI ' . ';..-':".,.':. t ' . • N,..... ‘1,;'. -, ,,, . t . • t 1"..;. ."\ \ A.,7k• . MI $ 1. - '1/4\•••• • 1.1 ''°'-. ' \\• 41§144, , Te... •-‘141 -', Aariaira .- '-;+•:.;, \..„ \.. N •,. _, • /... .•, , , .. .....- ...,..., ,,;.•. "..„..., , ,t • N,P.I."-"". 7-1-... . , t 1 I I .,-.., ;I (80 1 \• ' N.'k :\,..:\\N ., ,•,.7. __ .. --. ----;--j'. z - • • • -.- .....: •• • ; - . / .• 1 , ••. , 1 ;.._ 1, . . 71,15 •. , .-., ;,. . .„,• . ..--.;,..,...•,, , .. ':S.N., \\,.. N•, ig , . _ ,..• - + . . • i : , , ....-ki hi • ,-.."' - , ,....-,; I., , .. . ir . ;. ' 4 I iik f... .I f , ! tl ?, . s Nveggewiroo, ,l - ,, .- • 1.. ..1 •,. .. , _ . • 1 _ - ' +' 4. Y. .... .4.•• -• 11.11111111.1111M1111" 001...'4..':... ., jet XiljgraM rObitill..•........i.......-4A'. ,../Maitilakk N\ "...., '• _, _ww.vw a ilk -01444Wis..0441111101111111111111W- \ - 4 . ''::-'''''----'---- \_. . . _______-_-__-...._-__-...- --.1--1. ear.1.--gai. ........ .....-4 - ,'.";'AY!. '. ' '; : \L.% - . 1 • . , I '. .. .... , ,, t • . il ... \ . po _ •, . , 7.,, ° tzt-:, ti-- - :I . . !I, •. .11,,q, .-",:oltr•-,.. -- , ,- .:-.. .. i. ,. N.,.? • - 1 " ---. . IQ, . AV--, I ' 'I ' 'AI' I . ''-' •V 41; A ', t '.1\.' .. • • ' ..171 V , ,k4_ . . , ,-, • ,,... .4,---L__ .... ,-- 1;'P • -:" a .... - - *4. I , A . -, ,. i`.,. , .1 . (,11, . -• ..,_,,, ,20. '.I. Al ' - . , 1- ' A---.•- \\....•. -- ci , ... '., - •`• Il • c•:‘ ' ,..,. . e. - ---t ,..--' t , ., k 711W r.'• 7 , . .... ., ,. It 4.11t.iiil N:1 si... , ., •. i:tt: 1, pAtai....2POS7 T ...)41,•! :.L., 1 ''- . Iks•-,' . .... 1 1 ...,:..-.11' ri"-...-,--lw+ / ( ' V t° '0, • i I . ril , , , ,... , • ma„„ . ••:;„ki ,-..-.. V ' .1" 4 0 • 1 - 1- , s .4, ,i,... L.: ..? 4,,...4-411 '"N. -'--• ! 0 -I 1 itit - t. • .. '-)4'•_,_ ',.. 1 ,„ .• fit- ' ': -• ,.. l',,k.. \-,,,'• . .•N.77...k., A .it \ _ ,, ...._ - .:;11. : - I. _.--_, 1 ,,• •-• , • I 4 1 ar , ., ,- _ .. ,- t-r ." -fa , 1 ' , • ' ' -' - •-.....,•ai , , , 4E+. • . .. "91111, 1.,•••:- ,• [ 0 4 w J...,_ :..... ,-.1 . , • "AIM . . ' .‘ ‘ • ; •' - 1 -- rt 7. irg . ' . 6 '.• I' --' . •14.• I ' ' . "..4mosoll j•-• '4- • , .• . . ._. ,.. r ?a , --,---:./ ';.4 ,-. :**- .. i. , • iiir 1-111/1 t- 1 7'.. - - ' ' ' • ''''-' , : : loh. • _it N,. ,rl. . ,_ ., :, ,.....„ , . -, .... . , ...... ,..., _ .,...i., 1 . )i ' _ ' ..... f i i -i ,.«.,A.', .] . f. - :_ : .. •., 9' 11 ' .'1. - .'. , • . . 1 ./ '. I,...^ , I: :.i.7. ,I . . '''. ' . '' ,,, .- / : !-... - li 'II , i? , ; ,- 4 • ., *4 iti i-, - ••,t.„ t , .• Sh•.-• - _r0; . momosso. , ......4....., , -- as awe. -a. ..... ...,..• ., g , , ._. ...,......... . ... r • , A... ..• 4 •• 4.!•••••••, ,---' _ • ai. -11 ‘41C....,( pi idol'ec• *' .k '''''‘I..,'• ..:1 _ . ,''...I.: tn , .. 491. It • / . On-Skib• . J. 1. / 1 t...,. i •' ii - ,. -r.. . . • .• . . ::.• .,;---,.. , .„----,-.,- ., V 4. '' •P"' • ° -'I ".-:N. , A • ,,,,......s. 4 1-.;*• '‘. • _ • .7 .,: ,.7! ,•-• : ...t,J..- ,-4.,...-.... ...-...;-,:-.-„. -,, . • , •• )i- ' .1 1 . - 0. ..\ • .- e",, ..,. -...-• / • . agile ,i . • - I , • - .-1111hrr • • mir �� t. 1lir 71 t� t r 1 +" A - ',.' 2, f s f k f _ 1 41.....___,...,:-...-4- ,.. i i I• .---,.,,---c r •• . i 1L.L ..,it 1~ 1 !e ' 1 lk --- ' - • 1 ra I . ' 31t. 1 1.---- - - 1 \\ li 1 : JT !b - '''''-' *7; r-'---- i 1 8,,. ti-,ii...- ....-,,..., .... - ,3-__,. . _ HIPs. ___ . _/...,,, , , ,i. ,... ). :g 14 .-\ IL : ir...._.i....‘ ..(. ....... ‘. . ,.. • I --4 •. -• • .. iti . ,...,. — • • •f„ t -1;r? "'I". ' ; s.' - ' •, ._.1—... .. .1 fil • ,,, ._.. • 1 I• ..., , -if I ., -. . 111/41 , •.---.797-1- ,,• 5',. -.F'1. -7°- , . ' t.,.1 ' ., /. '--,-- - 0 --.'-•..N, ' :*-\. .. -- ,z4t11 . .. , r.C7.2 :•'•,;•,':':'' '`.II 31013! : :. t ; + ail 1 .I 1 .l '`_ �_ • _I • C•► «L _' t 1 I+ i w• ,lam e�Lc., i ._ i M0180W . , -1<ft,*-41:- i'l 1 a ; .c l'.; ' .. r- .• '. .11 - iiiit ••• ... , , .• ,\. ., . lie .. _ .... .. _ , . . , • . , . , . • L.' .4,- - • ' a - . ....I, r.. "T irk` µ- _ ai -,Ili;..). -1 1 ji 'sres.rv7.9‘ • ' 4.4' •''.) .‘' . .;;;'T- . ,,. ';'11.j . '.. 1.,_LL__ __.'...;.4171 ,11j Y ,,i;. .N - 4 . •• i .4 ,•p,, f 14%1 -.. .. ..,:„. . '.: .-,, N. .• i., .., ivtirr,. ..• .[, • : ., olio •,,._ ,,, , ,.. .i.. ..,, \\,..... . , ...- ,-,,-116 • C • ..::..., ..,i2 i / "' .- °lam 1 rTo,F .e ' c ,c.tr. j'`rf. it I'1.1 1 R — 11) unarm • 4 `.: ( - . ` c :,. '" Irl z • '- - - - -•. — . --; - ,L-L—E--r---- ''' . .-- % ' 1 —a-1 .1( '-17...-; tf ii f I l'• ' • 1 .f... i ' -..s. i --.. ! ,‘ :ti: _ '41 r 1 4!a 4,301 Ir: 1, Ar.,4711:—:kiii 6, , . ,•• , .,. Z ijr..,-. u,— � ' E e �U a R�tI?,�l �, S' . • ,•:: - , • 1 fr----1' i%114: , '''' AIL c ♦ . : - . .� .• _ *4- .r t - -. . a". ,..0 -., $0,,i,: „ x ut..- ''''.:,1,- N".c.....y-. • ..# 2.- "i" r., e , . " ' • .- 7,,..:.. . _.__:,,..,......„Ai..'...•.• 1;14, - 7 r ,,.. '.47. . . 104t.i 44\.,„ 14- ,N. . :,:%•• ' . ..., --.". • . , . i _!.-.:.. !; , ./. . , 4 i As. ., ' � -. 1 til 1 fr tit. � � -�� t �� �-.,41 .. - 1.' ''s A - - \o . :,I , ' i ,,'. / ` ' ``�-�--..' ---41...117..--....'7w..... \ `-`� _ .: , ;' i •• ! iii,. rli 1 (,....,, ./ , ,,,,,, ., -4.4cs. , r.,..v. _-----..-- :,....,,-iii.:„:....,,,,... ----2-0,...„...„,.._ ._:., -. .,..t'.:, ....,.,.:-. .; ‘,..7 , ,......; :v. .-r\.. .")'0 ./;;" -/-:',.-,'`.‹-4--• 4..,'-1134 11 ,t'•At --"-- -..'-1--- - *3'°- '.4.1411 * ' • n I 1•1 ' i-t-..1 N.\k :''r7 -- - i` • :' 1 . _. 4 ... . 7. - "rill'�►.1' !�t--c -_. ''''`W ..-mar._-_ _ - -..."4.6"" ."- --''`www. •_` . .': - Iii. • r� J . ..1. ,• L -„ \ 'i'.., NI , , 1 1 .. ,,.. r______ , ...„. r t�Y — Ai:, yf• •J 1 o -,r- -'' r t, S �: y 1,, • .. -+04:3370Q. .� .ail.-� ..� ,�" -•�.. . • i.. ,'•., N. �l,r J « ,, - - ..-%%-% ' 11 ..1 rI . i 1 ,' - t Iv. ,11° 1 X11 Illii_sr- - --,— –. ...i.'.'1%2 ‘ ' - ' fl f. 3 4e... ‘..: 11' ‘, - !•,....'.7. .:4".-74-:::4',.' .' . 41:?-4."1". - 1 ' 1 - . . ' iitirov . 7 011:iT4 . • .f (.'• • `'t r 1 ` _ j` t r + ., ''.:. , 1 , • .) 1� 14 1 1 f I S d '(,I 1 } . I ; .1, tl I f L 1 ,..,5,, 4r, �`r...---,...•\ ,,, 1• • ".:tiii il ` tyM!r. .'r. i lilt . iiI7 ' [.._ :iiiiime rti,-r-, ., , 1 t., 1- r �t .1 1...-. 4 1 • ` Q. • .. I 7 "•Ji---: .. •••••• 4111 ...U. ....., ....... `.r.... 440 - ' " 11 ,, •-...... ,, ,I.; :. , ,,-,- _ ._ . . 3* t.- ,,, . ) 0 -• 1 . . .„.4)(1,,r. .- : . r.7., ..c 7 vi..en.;,,, 1. . . .1 .,..4...,..1,,, ..,.. -,.. , % ,\ ._ , . 1:rip:. __-_-..-! II r I� '4 �.1; 1 r• 1 / .. I. i • 1� �I :I M Land Use In Rancho Cucamonga, vacant land has become a scarce resource. Land use decisions must be carefully crafted to protect established residential neighborhoods and plan for appropriate infill development while connecting land uses and transportation modes. These key objectives provide the framework for the City's land use strategies. Land use is a term that describes different types of activities that occur in a particular area. For example, some areas in Rancho Cucamonga contain homes while other areas contain stores, warehouses, parks, or schools. In some places, like Victoria Gardens, a mixture of uses creates an active and vital commercial and cultural center. This Land Use section describes the general location, type, and intensity of development throughout Rancho Cucamonga. The maps, graphics, and text in this section also define the distribution, intensity, and preferred form of land uses within residential neighborhoods, along key corridors, and on specific sites. The Land Use Policy Map (Figure LU-1) presents a pictorial representation of land use policy. Cumulatively, these policies will shape future development to maintain and enhance all areas of Rancho Cucamonga. Planning Context The pattern of development within Rancho Cucamonga is characterized by essentially a north/south split roughly along Foothill Boulevard. The northern two- thirds of the City are predominately residential, while the southern third is largely industrial. Commercial centers are primarily clustered along Foothill Boulevard, Base Line Road, and several other major roadways. The northern edge of the Sphere of Influence is dominated by open space and hillside terrain. Table LU-1 identifies the land use distribution for the City and Sphere of Influence by general categories as of 2009. Table LU-1: Land Use Distribution - 2009 0ii t Sphere of Total Percent of . Influence i Acres Total Acres Residential 10,310 125 10,435 39.3% Commercial 660 — 660 2.5% Mixed Use 702 -- 702 2.6% Industrial 3,203 -- 3,203 12.1% Public Facilities 1,656 1,448 3,104 11.7% Schools 536 -- 536 2.0% Parks 347 -- 347 1.3% Open Space and Conservation 707 1,186 1,893 7.1% Vacant 2,503 3.168 5,671 21.4% Total 20,624 5,927 26,551 100.0% Source:Rancho Cucamonga GIS data, 2009. Managing Land Use, Community Design,and Historic Resources LU-4 RAN C H O CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN ATTACHMENT D Resolution No. 16-067 - Page 13 of 49 • Development approaches will involve a variety of scales and spaces to provide interest and diversity. • An integrated circulation system of arterial access, internal circulation, parking facilities, pedestrian pathways, bicycle routes, transit stops (where applicable), and related signage will be provided. Movement among uses within a district will be possible without forcing patrons to use adjacent arterial highways. • Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles will be integrated into development approaches to provide both the reality and perception of public safety. • Adequate emergency vehicle access will be provided to address public safety needs. • All development will provide a unique and engaging experience for residents and visitors to the City, similar to those often found in older, walkable towns and cities. Victoria Gardens integrates'"�' • visa ,•t s� a retail shopping rs;` =1'*' '• • experience with public 4;1 • CI ,_.._. r.-31 . , spaces, including :', -- �. F ' , courtyards, squares, open N; ' � greens, playgrounds,and J ` */1 4`'`' plazas. • ='� !, 'P n` :. • rL V V y 4`i' d • Each application of the Mixed Use designation on the Land Use Plan has a specific intent, and the designation includes guidance tailored to the individual area. Flexibility is (lowed, and combinations of uses are permitted at a variety of intensities. Each of the Mixed Use areas discussed below include a description of the area and the uses that are allowed. Tables LU-2 thretfghand Table LU-443 identify themore specific standards for the Victoria Gardens/Victoria Arbors and Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 18) Mixed Use areas. Unless otherwise specified, the most intensive combination is the most desirable. The successful application of Mixed Use provisions inherently favors large area master planning allowing for greater development flexibility. Such master planning generally requires consolidated ownership or partnership agreements within the Planning Area. Mixed Use planning over fragmented ownership patterns and smaller project area size is problematic. Consolidation for development of Mixed Use projects is strongly encouraged. Alternatively, development proposals that contain fragmented ownership patterns within a Mixed Use area should be required to master plan adjoining areas outside of the proponent's site. The Mixed Use areas include (numbers correspond with Figure LU-3): Managing Land Use, Community Design,and Historic Resources LU-16 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Resolution No. 16-067 - Page 14 of 49 1. Victoria GardensNictoria Arbors 11. Western Gateway(Bear Gulch Area) 2. Town Center(Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue) 12. Foothill Boulevard and Cucamonga Channel Site 3. Terra Vista 13. Historic Alta Loma(Amethyst Site) 4. Foothill Boulevard between Hermosa Avenue and Center Avenue 14. Southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue 5. Foothill Boulevard between Archibald Avenue and Hellman Avenue 15. Southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue 6. Foothill Boulevard at Helms Avenue and Hampshire Street 16. Southeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street 7. Foothill Boulevard and Mayten Avenue 17. Northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue 8. Industrial Area Specific Plan (Sub- Area 18) 18. Northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue 9. Foothill Boulevard and Deer Creek Channel 19. Southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue 10. Haven Avenue and Church Street Site 20. Northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue Industrial Designations Industrial areas in Rancho Cucamonga benefit from their strategic location near the I- 15 and 1-10 freeways, the Metrolink station, and railway lines. A variety of light industrial, business park, office, manufacturing, heavy industrial, and similar business and industrial uses have been established, providing diverse employment opportunities for residents throughout the Inland Empire. Three Industrial designations are established that continue to provide many industrial development opportunities. Industrial Park (Probable FAR of 0.40 and Maximum FAR of 0.60) . • The Industrial Park designation accommodates master-planned concentrations of light industrial, research and development businesses, green technology, and general and medical office uses. The designation also allows for limited convenience goods • and services for employees and visitors. Industrial Park uses are typically labor intensive, meaning that the number of employees =- .; per acre is higher than uses involving mostly manufacturing or warehousing. The Industrial Park designation applies to major .F- VT.;J traffic corridors in the City, including 4'" Street, Haven Avenue, rY; - ,,.r _ Arrow Highway, and Foothill Boulevard, near the largest concentrations of civic and commercial activity. Industrial Park General Industrial(Probable FAR of 0.50 and Maximum FAR of 0,60) The General Industrial designation permits a wide range of industrial activities that include manufacturing, assembling, fabrication, wholesale supply, heavy commercial, Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GE N E RAL PLAN LU-17 Resolution No. 16-067 - Page 15 of 49 parkland owned by the City. Parklands include traditional neighborhood-level and community-level parks, as well as multi-purpose recreation-oriented lands such as the Epicenter and Central Park. Planned park sites are identified generally in areas where future residential development will occur. The location of future parks will be further defined by detailed neighborhood site planning and the City's desire to locate new parks adjacent to and integrated with school sites. The City also controls 130 acres of undeveloped parkland not including undeveloped trail acreage. Land Use Overlays To add additional flexibility for land development while maintaining other community goals and priorities, the City has created overlay zones for very specific areas. These include the Haven Avenue Office District, the Equestrian/Rural Area, and the Master Plan Overlay. The benefit of overlay zones is the ability to customize development agreements to achieve higher standards and appropriate densities that support the overall goals of the district. In addition to these, the Development Code also includes a Senior Housing Overlay District and the Hillside Overlay District. Haven Avenue Office Overlay The Haven Avenue Office Overlay District provides an area for intensive, high-quality office development at this highly visible community gateway. A progressive, sophisticated, and urban style of development is required for the area, which is envisioned as the City's premier office corridor. Haven Avenue has a unique combination of access to 1-10 and LA/Ontario International Airport, making it an Ideal location for high-end office development. Equestrian/Rural Overlay The Equestrian/Rural Overlay District allows for the keeping of horses and other farm animals, subject to regulations specified in the Development Code. All new developments within this overlay zone are required to provide community and local trails for equestrian use in accordance with the Hiking and Riding Trails Plan (see Chapter 5, Community Services). Properties designated as Very Low Residential are also subject to the Equestrian/Rural Overlay regulations. Master Plan Overlay The Master Plan Overlay District provides a tool to look beyond the limits of a particular property to solve area- or district-wide circulation, drainage, and neighborhood compatibility issues. The Master Plan Overlay creates an opportunity for the City to address the special or unique needs or characteristics of certain areas so designated by the General Plan, to ensure a harmonious relationship between existing and proposed uses, and to coordinate and promote the community improvement efforts of both private and public resources. The requirement for implementation of a project using the Master Plan Overlay is to prepare a conceptual master plan as a precursor to entitlement approval. Figure LU-2 identifies the locations of the Master Plan Overlays. Planning Direction for Mixed Use Areas Mixed Use designations assume a significant role in this General Plan The majority of these designations are arrayed along Foothill Boulevard near major street intersections Their location is of critical importance because Foothill Boulevard is one of the City's core commercial corridors. Additional mixed use areas are located along bus routes (and bus stops), near the Rancho Cucamonga Metrolink Station, and historic downtown Alta Loma. These locations are important as they are areas of more intense commercial activity, interest, or opportunities. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-20 RANCHO CUCAMONGA G E N E RAL PLAN Resolution No. 16-067 - Page 16 of 49 Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA G E N E RAL PLAN LU-21 Resolution No. 16-067 - Page 17 of 49 are within ...... _ ice of thes _ti nt,public -•..=,...:-_,,-,...; • .,-7-0,1 ' i, d cultural . - it Victoria "`, � ;> Gardens. ,,,, , • ; \ .y.. .� `— . t,:.:":,1,:-r.,..., LI" v I j r 1' 1� ME 1f I • Table LU-2: Victoria Gardens/Victoria Arbors Land Use Mii Acreage Range Estimated"Most Density(du/acre) Case"Acres/Dwelling Dwelling Unit Range Unite(di.i) Commercial—retail,service commercial,office,tourist 20%-41% 99-209 acres 222 acres commercial Public/Quasi Public— performing arts center,trails, 5%- 12% 26-61 acres 40 acres landscape/hardscape,public spaces 77-153 acres @ 98 acres @ Residential 15%-30% 14 du/acre2 14 du/acre? 788 to 1,852 du 1,082 du Residential/Mixed Use 3-21 acres 3 acres @ Main Street Area 0% -40/0 14-100 du/acre 100 du/acre 290 du 290 du 32 acres 32 acres @ Residential Low Medium 6% 4-8 du/acre 8 du/acre 128 to 256 du 208 dui Total Residential' 21%-36% 112-206 acres 133 acres 1,206 to 2,398 du 1,580 du Rights-of-way 20%-25% 102-128 acres 115 acres collector/local roads Totals 100% 510 acres 510 acres Notes: 1. The acreage in this category also includes land for local park and school purposes. 1. Indicates target density, not a range. Actual density may increase up to 20 du/ac as long as the total of 1,082 dwelling units is not exceeded. 3. Indicates target dwelling units based on historic City experience where development occurs midway between 50-75%of the range. Managing Land Use, Community Design,and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-23 Resolution No. 16-067 - Page 18 of 49 Figure LU-3: Mixed Use Areas Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-24 RAN C H o CUCAMONGA G E N E RAL PLAN Resolution No. 16-067 - Page 19 of 49 Mixed Use: Town Center (Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue) The Town Center Mixed Use Area (#2 on Figure LU-3) functions as a vibrant community activity center at the southwestern corner of the Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard intersection. The other three corners are comprised of a mix of public service, commercial, office, and historic uses. The intent of the Mixed Use designation at this location is to: • Complete and strengthen the town center complex with complementary, community-oriented uses. • Introduce a distinct, intensified, Mixed Use development project that maximizes the potential of this key site and relates to surrounding uses in the node. • Reinforce the Haven Avenue office corridor and anchor it at the north end. • Contribute to a unique architectural presence by providing a design contrast to the City Hall/County Courthouse facilities, Town Center commercial complex, and the historic Virginia Dare winery building. The primary, but not exclusive uses is are shown in Table LU 3 Multi-family Residential and Commercial Office, within the Town Center node at Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue. Office uses, when completed, will be located along Haven Avenue and will provide convenient pedestrian access to nearby commercial and civic uses. Commercial uses include specialty restaurants, cafes, small retail stores, and other service commercial uses catering to the large employee population along Haven Avenue and the nearby industrial area. The design and facade treatment of commercial uses complement and provide visual interest. Common outdoor spaces provide comfort and shelter within an attractive landscaped/hardscaped setting, and connect to the Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue intersection. Public/Quasi Public uses complement the City Hall and the County Gcourthouse facilities. Government offices, community meeting facilities, and a public plaza or sculpture garden represent some of the possibilities. Public spaces provide connections, both physically and visually, to other uses within the Town Center node. This area offers a special opportunity to reflect a strong visual recognition of the vineyard historical heritage in this central portion of the City; this topic is also discussed in the Community Design section of this Chapter. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-26 RAN C H O CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Resolution No. 16-067 - Page 20 of 49 • • • Town Center at Foothill Boulevard and Haven a ;• ' Avenue. so gifir • i • L • Residential uses are an integral part of the development, oriented to the Town Center node. The location is well suited for workers seeking condominiums and higher-end apartments close to jobs and community services. Pedestrian connections between residential and non-residential uses are lined with open space paseos and well- lighted paths. Table L specifies--the--uses-and`4l e-fange-of . , ua n_ ..ue Lan Uea 11111 inibP41.10 e#f+se; 10% 15%, 3 b acroc 6-awes teugsi commercial 30% 50% 10 15 rites 1-5-acre6 community thoater; 0% 10% 0 3 acroc 4--arra institutional rt 9 asfesca 9-acres@ Residef i.al 25%35% 4-44u/aC4e4 14 cro4 4•1,24el-0$da 126 du Rights-of wa — 644 -1zasfes -1--acre Totals 408°{e 34-acres 3.1•-acres Note:, Mixed Use: Terra Vista Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RAN C H O CUCAMONGA G E N E RAL PLAN LU-27 Resolution No. 16-067 - Page 21 of 49 The Terra Vista Mixed Use Area (#3 on Figure LU-3) is located along the north side of Foothill Boulevard and is bisected by Milliken Avenue. This area is part of the Terra Vista Community Plan, approved in 1981, and one of the key remaining areas left to be developed within the Terra Vista Community. The intent is to: • Establish a large office complex with an emphasis on medical corporate offices and financial services. • Complement the concentration of health care and medical facilities in the area. • Incorporate a high-density residential component near commercial and public services. _ A.cwa0a rDn7ctease Land-41a•e 85X,87% 46 47ac4es 47 acroo 6,6-84"WAG es@ Roeontfal 12% 15% 8.14 14 24 /acre dulac ld1 e' 113 196 Totals 489% 53..6-age6 53-5-asres Alef&. . _ - - - est Mixed Use: Foothill Boulevard between Hermosa Avenue and Center Avenue This site is located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Hermosa Avenue and Center Avenue (#4 on Figure LU-3). A Master Plan was approved and implemented for the site, which includes a 10.5-acre, 166-unit workforce multi-unit housing project an existing restaurant at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Center Avenue and •• - -'- , - --, - -- -- - - - --- - :-- The properties at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue are underutilized and provide an excellent opportunity for redevelopment. The intent of the mixed use designation is to introduce a combination of uses that balances the site's proximity to commercial and residential development Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-28 RAN C H O CUCAMONGA G E N ERA L PLAN Resolution No. 16-067 - Page 22 of 49 Estimated"-Nest band tdse Percent Acreage Cas ' a Range Range AMFes1DweIiing du) Realdentiai 1943-asfee Medium-444h 0% 62% 0 10.6 acro° 2A-du/acre fierasre)' 210 du C mmecotai—.Retai4ar►dtestaurant 0%-100% 0 17 acro° 17 asfes Neter esidential ig Foothill -i i between ..� —. _1 �wr i • _ ,_ nd Center h. T „a.` % Avenues. `~ "77—Y �� •� ,tom }— . Qti Fti - v - res',, ,b..;,/ •, .-�,11.1( • , • r-3 • �'. 1 Mixed Use: Foothill Boulevard between Archibald Avenue and Hellman Avenue This area(# 5 on Figure LU-3) is comprised of a stretch of small properties along the north side of Foothill Boulevard that are candidates for revitalization, Since Foothill Boulevard is also Historic Route 66, it has seen much change over the years. Many of the shopping centers reflect a different style and set of standards than more contemporary developments. Therefore, their vitality has been limited and, over the course of time,will diminish. Revitalization can occur either on an individual parcel basis or more comprehensively through land assembly. A large portion of this area has already been developed for residential use (Main Street at Route 66). The remaining corners at Hellman and Archibald Avenues have not been redeveloped. This Mixed Use designation will facilitate the re-use of challenging parcel sizes and dimensions through flexibility in site planning and use configuration. The intent is to achieve: • A revitalized"mini-district"that has unique appeal to residents and visitors • An intimate, walkable character with an interesting mix of businesses integrated with residential • A distinct appearance and ambiance that sets the area apart from other portions of Foothill Boulevard Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RAN C H O CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-29 Resolution No. 16-067 - Page 23 of 49 • A small but distinct complex of multi-unit housing that gives the neighborhood a permanent residential anchor • "Main Stre ;.'• - residential _ • along Foo' Ad_ near Hellrr tet`! • Fs • .. 1 -7 7 y p,• uitl t1..SI--{revs _ ti « sIv• _. � : v� •y' ' • { tr. 64E7i_ � �'xJ. `�� .`ate::"_•. :+C Retail uses may be combined with office uses to achieve multi-story buildings. The clustering of buildings is desirable, along with shared parking facilities. The overall design should provide a pedestrian ambiance that is distinct from the surrounding auto-oriented commercial development. Residential development is an integral part of this Mixed Use area. A range of housing types is envisioned, including condominiums, apartments, and lofts. The inclusion of home enterprise (live/work) uses may involve more activity than typical home occupations but will still present a fundamentally residential character. The creative integration of residential development will add variety and ongoing activity along this segment of Foothill Boulevard. - • _. - - -- - • - - ' - •.• ' - = = --_' :. : -••-••••: - --- - - - - • • - _ - • M oot 'RtfV`\IOV Mange Dweitiot alt-Ranee Commercial 30% 33°x, fasces 12.5 acroc 4-1,3-awes-@a 4-4-4-asses-tea 3044-30% acre4 -1-6-du/asre44 170 du 4-7-0-4444 7-15 awes @ 4-3,7-acres-4 Reeldential-14404' 37% 40% 3O acce 30-dulasre; 3284e-450434J 411 du Total-6 400% 37V-awes 37.5 acroc Notes 4-- .. ' - - . _ : _ _ ... - -• _ . Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU30 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GEN E RAL PLAN Resolution NOV 16-067 - Page 24 of 49 • - • - - i i •P�. , .�'1.•_...OM1`=.•:?_ • .4` 1A;7 .. .F� a__`._2_••!S __S'LAS..A_L 7.{... . • It II U•nit€44/414 Mixed Use: Foothill Boulevard at Helms Avenue and Hampshire Street This site is located on Foothill Boulevard between Helms Avenue, Hampshire Street, and Malachite Avenue (#6 on Figure LU-3). The long-established commercial shopping center presents an opportunity to revitalize this site with neighborhood commercial-serving uses and residential development. The self-storage facility located at Helms Avenue and Hampshire Street will buffer the low-density residential development to the south. __ e _ e _. •_ . - _ _ ._ _ . . allowed- Hatt hire Street ilialit:111"f".4-emi".9:44".64t54446""44' Call.1244441.8".4.114M741147 CoMMOssial 604,44)% 38-4.4asres 4-4-aF;rras of _,-.5 acres-@ Residential 30% 10% 30 d4acre4 39-d44lours4 46-4G-7-6-4u g da T-etais 100% 6.3-acres 64-acres Not-€.4 • Mixed Use: Foothill Boulevard and Mayten Avenue This site is located on Foothill Boulevard and Mayten Avenue (#7 on Figure LU-3). The relatively large vacant site should provide a combination of restaurants, entertainment, retail, hospitality, office, and residential opportunities within an urban village setting. Commercial uses should be located along Foothill Boulevard, with retail buildings fronting the boulevard to create a more pedestrian-friendly street frontage. Large-scale retail business and "big box" buildings are allowed so long as they accommodate automobile, pedestrian, and a variety of transit modes of transportation. Smaller retail and restaurant buildings are encouraged to be grouped continuously along the street, while individual building pads separated by large parking areas are discouraged. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RAN C H O CUCAMONGA G E N E RAL PLAN LU-31 Resolution No. 16-067 - Page 25 of 49 A pedestrian-friendly, gridded street network is recommended for the interior to connect the commercial and residential areas, while surface parking areas are encouraged to be located behind buildings. Pedestrian connections to Foothill Boulevard and transit stops will also be important. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-32 RAN C H O CUCAMONGA G E N E RAL PLAN Resolution No. 16-067 - Page 26 of 49 Perseatf 1d 1Jse , Range Dwwl -Bangs ur;lta{do) Gommaroiai 40%60% 19.1 28.7 acro& 28.7 acro& 6% 10% 2-9-48asres X1.8 acro& 4% 1.9 acroe 1-9-awes 1.2.123..9asres-@ 1 acres—^ Residential 26% 50°< 24-30 duiacre4 30&i/asre' 298t.o-717du 3 + Totals 100% 47.8 acro& 4-7,8acres Note:: The residential component will provide connections in the form of small interior streets and pedestrian paseos to the commercial and office components of the development. Residential development should also include an active street front instead of blank walls along Mayten Avenue and Malaga Drive, and interior streets to connect the various parts of the development. Isolated and gated residential development that is walled off from adjoining uses would be prohibited. Nearly--two-acres . - . ....- - •• • - . . __ - - • . . - - • et• •- - - •e.•_ - = -- - _ - -- --er ewraged---4or--the Mixed Use: Industrial Area Specific Plan (Sub-Area 18) This area is bounded on the south by 4"' Street, on the east by Milliken Avenue, on the north by the railroad, and on the west by Utica Street (#8 on Figure LU-3). The development is entirely built out. It surrounds an 18-hole golf course and includes the Metrolink Station off Milliken Avenue. The Industrial Area Specific Plan (Empire Lakes) Mixed Use area reflects the mixed land use approved under the Rancho Cucamonga IASP Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan. The intent of the Mixed Use designation is to: • Promote planning flexibility to achieve more creative and imaginative employment-generating designs • Integrate a wider range of retail commercial, service commercial, recreation, and office uses within this industrial area of the City • Allow for the sensitive inclusion of high-density residential development that offers high-quality multi-unit condominiums and apartments for employees desiring housing close to work and transit Table LU-G3 specifies the uses and range of development allowed. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-33 Resolution No. 16-067 - Page 27 of 49 Table LU-93: Mixed Use:industrial Area Specific Plan/Subarea 18 Acreage Range Land Use Percent Average Density Case" Range (du/acre) AcreslDweilingi. Dwelling Units Units(du) Commercial-retail,service commercial,tourist commercial, 15%-25% 34-57 acres 40 acres office(commercial and professional) Office professional, medical 40%-60% 90-136 acres 110.5 acres corporate offices Publie/Quasi-Public/Recreation 7.5% 16.5 ac 16.5 acres 25-50 acres @ 50 acres @ Residential 11%-22% 27.75 du/acre' 27.75 du/acre' 694 to 1,388 du 1,388 du ROW--Metrolink Parking 4.5% 10.3 ac 10.3 acres Totals 100% 227 acres 227 acres Note: 1. Indicates target density, not o range. Actual density may increase up to 27.75 du/ac as long as the total of 1,388 dwelling units is not exceeded. Mixed Use: Foothill Boulevard and Deer Creek Channel This site, located at Foothill Boulevard along Deer Creek Channel (#9 on Figure LU- 3), provides an excellent opportunity to integrate commercial and residential uses into a cohesive development. Commercial development will be sited along the Foothill Boulevard frontage, while residential development will be located toward the southern area of the property. Development should provide pedestrian access between uses and direct pedestrian connections to Foothill Boulevard and transit stops. High-density development should step down to detached residential development along the western boundary providing a transition to the adjacent low- density residential development. Public street connections to Hampshire Street and Devon Street in the adjacent residential neighborhood will be discouraged, except for emergency vehicles. . ' 9 - • - - Cel Pat+oat�Q Aenage-Rao�+ n oen Cemmersial 25% 30°1 4.4 6.3 acroc 6.3 acros 12.1 13.3 acres @ 42:4-acres- Resideatiaii 70% 75°k 10-1.4 Jasre' 14du/asre' 124 to 186 du 174 du Totals 100% 47-4-ascee 4-74-a6ree Note: Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-34 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Resolution No. 16-067 - Page 28 of 49 Mixed Use: Haven Avenue and Church Street This 14.77-acre site, located on the south side of Church Street between Center Avenue and Haven Avenues, was once the location of a San Bernardino County Flood Control District retention basin (#10 on Figure LU-3). Deemed surplus due to drainage improvements within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, it became available for private development. The site was recently developed, in part, with a multi-unit condominium complex located within the interior of the site and single-family residences lined along Center Avenue. The mixed use designation allows for future intensification, a broader mix of land uses, or redevelopment 034400% 0-36-96-acres 034-3004/, 0-3: 6 acres dwelling nits p c1 Mixed Use: Western Gateway (Bear Gulch Area) This area (#11 on Figure LU-3) serves as the entrance to the City from the west, and is part of an important historical heritage that has not been able to compete successfully in the market place. The intent is to achieve: • A dynamic entrance to Rancho Cucamonga that reflects and sustains the historic character represented by a few existing structures in the area • A "target district" that attracts specialty businesses and is attractive to both local residents and visitors to the community • A significant example of the Historic Route 66 theme to exemplify the important role of the Rancho Cucamonga area during that historic era • A sustainable economic vitality The primary, but not exclusive, proposed uses are retail and service commercial serving the Red Hill and Bear Gulch neighborhoods, as well as selective markets on a more regional scale. This area has served as a "dinnerhouse" district, which is a desirable continued role as exemplified by the Sycamore Inn and the Magic Lamp Restaurants. However, there is not enough vitality in the area to sustain that specialty. By allowing a mix of commercial, tourist commercial, office, and residential development with somewhat greater intensities than currently prevail, the possibility exists to generate investment interest in this area. Tourist-serving commercial uses are an important component of this concept, but it must be recognized that the location limits access to as large a market as could be achieved at a freeway location. Office development is proposed as a means of achieving some level of daytime and early evening population in the area. Residential development should be multi-unit condominium and apartment types to energize the district during day and evening business hours. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA G E N E RAL PLAN LU-35 Resolution No. 16-067 - Page 29 of 49 _ .. - -- ' - =• - 2.•:_ - . Tatile2 the-market seramersialregee 60%40% 27.5 38-5 acres 38.5 acro& fd firefessienai) C 5i-v,.5 227.5 nacres 16,5-acres @ Residential 3014_50% 4-1-du/asre4 4-4-de/acre4 234-te•3SS du 231 du Totals 400% 55,0 rices 55-0-acres Netea Mixed Use: Foothill Boulevard-Cucamonga Channel Site This 7.24-acre site, located at the southern base of"Red Hill,"is strategically near the northwest corner of Historic Route 66 Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue (#12 on Figure LU-3). This site, already developed, partially anchors the west end of Foothill Boulevard with multi-unit residential development. Although the original intent was to develop the site with a mix of office and residential, the site is entirely developed with residential uses, however, the mixed use designation allows for future intensification, a broader mix of land uses, or redevelopment Like--other newly - . . 0'4--444% 0-7 )4-awes Office OV. 100% 0 7.24 acro& Neter: . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-36 RANCHO CUCAMONGA G E N E RAL PLAN Resolution No. 16-067 - Page 30 of 49 Channel Site _ .. . . .. . _. . Land U c Pa-moot-Range A$reage- Range Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RAN C H O CUCAMONGA G E N E RAL PLAN LU-37 Resolution No. 16-067 - Page 31 of 49 Mixed Use: Historic Alta Loma (Amethyst Site) This is a relatively small, but significant, site within the historic Alta Loma commercial area (#13 on Figure LU-3) that was once the location of a large citrus packing house. The site is strategically located on the east side of Amethyst Street, between the neighborhood elementary school and original downtown for the Alta Loma community. This site, already developed, brings new activity into the historic town center with multi-unit residential development. Mixed Use Loma(Am .ti „„! 1 Ir 1111 4. 414* - _ },i`. — AP* : - . 1 Pece•iit-Range AapealwRange ReakienUal-MeittionSigh 0% 100% 0-3,24-aeras 0% 100°- 0-3,24acres Mixed Use: Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue This site of approximately 10 acres is located near the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue, is partially developed and includes existing commercial retail uses along the street frontages (#14 on Figure LU-3) The intent of the mixed use designation is to incorporate a mix of uses that will complement and integrate the existing adjacent commercial development, and provide a buffer for the existing residential development to the south. Mixed Use: Southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue This site of approximately 13 acres is bounded on the north by Foothill Boulevard, on the east by Aspen Street, on the west by Haven Avenue, and on the south by City Hall and the County courthouse (#15 on Figure LU-3). The site is partially developed with multi-tenant office buildings. The intent of the mixed use designation is to introduce a combination of uses that balances the site's proximity to existing office uses with future commercial and residential development. Mixed Use: Southeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-38 RAN C H O CUCAMONGA G E N E RAL PLAN Resolution No. 16-067 - Page 32 of 49 This site of approximately 6 acres is comprised of 5 parcels and contains a combination of residential and commercial land uses (#16 on Figure LU-3), located at the southeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street, south and east of existing single-family residential neighborhoods This site, which was semi-developed prior to the City's incorporation, contains the Cour House. a local historic landmark, a US Post Office, and a combination of non-conforming residential and commercial structures. The intent of this site is to achieve a mix of multi-family residential and commercial land uses Mixed Use: Northwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard This site of approximately 7 acres is comprised of 6 parcels and is located at the northwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard (#17 on Figure LU-3). The site is predominately vacant, but contains an existing non-conforming commercial structure. The intent of the mixed use designation is to allow for the flexibility of land uses such as high density residential, live/work units, and commercial components. Commercial development should be oriented towards Foothill Boulevard with multi-family units located near the site's interior. The high density residential and live/work units will buffer the multi-family residential development existing north of the site from future commercial uses. Mixed Use: Northeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard This site of approximately 6 acres is comprised of 3 parcels and is located at the northeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard (#18 on Figure LU-3) This site is currently vacant, and existing multi-family developments are located to the north and east. The intent of the mixed use designation is to allow for the flexibility of land uses such as high density residential, live/work units, and commercial components Commercial development should be oriented towards Foothill Boulevard with multi-family units located near the site's interior. The high density residential and live/work units will buffer the multi-family residential development existing north and east of the site from future commercial uses. Mixed Use: Southeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard This site of approximately 5 acres is comprised of 2 parcels and is located at the southeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard (#19 on Figure LU-3). Existing single-family residential uses are located east and south of the site The intent of the mixed use designation is to allow for the flexibility of land uses such as high density residential, live/work units, and commercial components. Commercial development should be oriented towards Foothill Boulevard with multi-family units located near the site's interior. The high density residential and live/work units will buffer the single-family residential development existing south and east of the site from future commercial uses. Mixed Use: Northwest corner of East Avenue and Foothill Boulevard This site of approximately 20 acres is comprised of 5 parcels and is located at the northwest corner of East Avenue and Foothill Boulevard (#20 on Figure LU-3) The site is currently vacant, is bounded by an existing utility corridor to the west and north, and contains a one-half acre Cucamonga Valley Water District facility. The intent is to develop this mixed use area by incorporating high density residential with Managing Land Use, Community Design,and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GEN E RAL PLAN LU-39 Resolution No. 16-067 - Page 33 of 49 live/work units in the southern portion and moderate density residential development and live/work units in the northern portion Implications of Land Use Policy Over time, the distribution of uses within the community will change as vacant properties develop and application of land use policy will facilitate evolution toward the mix of uses the City envisions. Table LU 154 summarizes the level of development expected through the 2030 planning horizon year. The anticipated change from year 2009 baseline conditions are shown as well. As planned infrastructure improvements, long-term public facility and service needs, and resource use set forth in the other General Plan Chapters have been based on these growth projections, the City will continue to track development to monitor projected versus actual conditions, and to adjust policies and implementation programs accordingly. Tables LU-1-66 through LU-4g7 summarizes the build-out capacity in detail for each land use designation. Table : Build-Out Summary Baseline:2009' General Plan Build Out:2030 Change Percen City SOF Total City SOF Total (total only) Changs` Dwelling Units 55,608 91 55,699 62,196 1,057 63,253 7,554 13.6% Population 179,200 300 179,500 200,400 3,400 203,800 24,300 13.5% Non- Residential 80,030,000 0 80,030,000 99,797,000 0 99,797,000 19,767,000 24.7% Square Feet Employment 77,350 0 77,350 103,040 0 103,040 25,690 33.2% Notes: 1. 2009 Baseline data is based on Existing Land Use Geographical Information Systems land use data. 2. SOI:Rancho Cucamonga Sphere of Influence. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-40 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL Pl. AN Resolution No. 16-067 - Page 34 of 49 1. -J NN 0 OC C U -0 Q 91 N NcoN ro Q NN NN Cy 0 0+ v C R c0 ^ C) N. .- uL M .h 0 O O. N•1:3 b nr o y C C O N N O y •3 .E + ° e Qco -a Ci v 0 NO C `-0' O d la- v U coo N o o `n m O q b a L u O t0 O O co C) h O� N b C j .,,.. q C6 co c i o co cc d S o a 3 51 c b U C b O V (7 N C~7 N O 3 b t Chi Q w N cci g o o a 3 - O h • 0) N- co ri N. U vi Q� O Q a v �0 4 O oto 0 N- 0 N. C')CD v et g �%, Q C '� �¢, Cr, C v c r N C, a C ,D O N yc, Q 0 4 4, O LA CI v 41 a o °i o, W -0 `�``•. ` k ` 4 a s ], o •a a n a Cu 0 Q Q c `C Ea . o. zob ° u o oa ✓ N d ' '•nJ- 0+ b �. N . Q Q, d b -0 C h . o ••• b4 .... W V O b O 40 • N b y 0 E O c .+ 01E C • d N .L_'' O C Q a •� • li o W bw U a, a E Q; v h a/'1 v o o rr�� N o t E. 0 c ) In T u� N N r) N1.5.....a, .- O 1-0, W i r) O [h N v N C n • O.i t -o I� cci r 0) ti r •) O Q W = O b CU j 13 a oc, O v; ..., o a E0 o y 'U b ^ v S E z ti {10 N a00 0 N- N CI rOi rt G O 3 '•b -0 b 6, coNQ ',.,`/• N 0 0 ,_ c0 0) h W O p 0 GCi C y �^ -0 J ,, , O OS c0 ,A O co �D O ` ,C O V is Fy+ ▪ czt, 7 S. '- c E v. et , �po N- cD N.1� o, ._ CvN. N. EC I:C ^ N ch 0. E 0: ''...c.V QCi V Q 1 rl i Oi h (D O 7 •Q . a U ate., E •� { o v b a o 0 0 �' a0 a. `b = h o <,,, c c Z. a w Bti abb ' N • ca Ti ti 10 c w P{ - b a C -0 yab O L O '^ ,n l7 CC `-. b n CO Lo in cA Otin N pp N N N a UQO CC O . C QN N- m p 0 NCI O O� bv lJcu E C ' v b = a d . , b > z C a C0O ¢,y p III 3 C` Eli -3 1N O 1 Q O v b N O yt 2o v • c a 3 c b n, oN I v o nEa ° o qg.e U vd dWo `g' F w .. al o a I a1.10 10 J :� and 9 56 ry = �o CI l ti• a -z 3 I- o Ova i C O �...i • d' I > _J J� 2 2 i 2 O6 w 2 mi m a z _ U O Z C b Q Z cc Resolution No. 16-067 - Page 35 of 49 v z Laa Q O -' ✓ a � CC C ID IS") c rn g g 6•3 2 '4 J co to co r N e-• N . M 0Qa V O V M co (0 rDto ON Ntc, (ACC r) ZW "0 - 01 p p p Q C 2 J • CO M N S O N. O 1A N N O ' 1 , 0 W • �+ O O? O N N N t0 CO N m IO • U GG s e- ci N [V N Iff1,1 4.4 �. ta C 2 t a IIC Q Q i0 11pp r T r-? �N v) N U WII 1 N M N h LIM co to in n co M n a U o N n O -44004, . 1:11 Q • _r _ 0 U v o z kie Cr a 0 a W. 8 , I 2 rn O m o ory' to CO N ID r0 �t`ejQpL t0 to 4' 7 O •G N r N r- C� to Obi •E O O O O O b O O O O III i: O a0 NQ1� 0- M M M a) M M N. N tfj O N N COg N ti C p r N- cb 1D O? O� OI 11iiii„,.... Lri 4-7 co N .� '� U ri io F. m i9 O 'C�... ' ` 2 t O i � O_ •C ti C n M N .D MN • CU M r �.y �6/! % R CO r- ✓I ✓ ECO • r_. O O 90 I m m 4 ci,3' iii '-- co tO E W LL UD 'f CV CIDG 'a r CV 0 N g cu I N y lik ! E LC '� N ( (C)M I Q LL Q Z y N LL p LL -i -J- 0, m O x O cc u• ii E t LLo 0 Ii-C4Y III T r4 .. �o h ocu 11 0 f, E 0 5 _ H N J Resolution No. 16-067 - Page 36 of 49 § j P- / / 7 § Cu !;:lii + \ \o \ \ / V k / 2 k { \ \ ° ' © o [ \ / 3' -� § ( r »33 ) k � @ ! i 0 01 t CU A-k§ )ƒ \ # 2 , � = 2c.,- = u d \/ \ 2 ° , -0 { £ ° 0 2 oi w $ / / \ / 5- \ -o 'S o maE ■ [2 , , , . % [ V § � ` ` ) ^ k0.k � § } � � &p, 0 t I.-- ] § 7 § \) � � cC \ k �1/ ) _ \ \it \ \ ZO 13 / E ` � at,E : / [u !! uI ®al a CO\ { \ Li£ / f § camto « _e ' .. ) k /) 2 ~ E 0 : 0 R o O Ca kww + � b = 'en u § Z o < cc Resolution No. 16-067 - Page 37 of 49 '^ z Cl 0 O -' v a 0 $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 00 N O Of O . N OD § SI ✓ J ll C7 f7 r O tD P. cr r C'7 ~"40 N 0Q N d'ZwbC Z f� 1A N lA l'�7 O , , , WO N N Nmm QP7fNOcu li G C) N C)▪ Q . - ,c Di. l7 C Z to Z ago m ai ri c�i'i r44 r EE 2 u c eo vi Q.7. ▪ V SI co , I . J D N C V O O C = GA1O N O f'1 F., C , , , , , , i ' i , , , " • v r M O CO N V N C! IN cd ai N r h10 O• Z to Q cG aQ ae * ae e * o o ae o * * * * * * * ae ae e-" - _ 7 O Q uO ' N V? tD cc r c. "r N0. O to r n O 1M to CO f� ri r O O O O 4 N O N M 01 C') O N 2pF , r r CO h r CD C`7 r reig � a) N � 4043 .' ' 53V m0A 2 2 i r COto Cq NO r N r P7 � T ' N ` to O. i m Q R c N C N �` O N 1 i 0 G b 1. 2 '6- uuN77 R t8 a s Of 01 .q. 7 2 2 r 03 4i r O C) 00 N. C') C .- uY ['Y ,Jr, CO a0O c7 1� It) y .moi V r zD CO CO NO r r b T N y N C C 3 O bC Cu CI ilS:1- I !! l ! 1!IIi11 b Z.. O W 0 O p a 0 N Q >, pp LL O [�•{/�] N N V 7 00 4 LL A S. O U Q '� ►- O 0 d 2, IS O $ 1 1!g• t C O .,<— ' v N ,-, m c d C q1 (Q, x _ is. _o ,� O C CC - �Qj O v r LL y.� 1 72 c N 3 2 -N Q V _ O O .t O b O U m ct m m O (..) t9 0 O J h I. m c F co > c� C -2- i ~ c z ca E a. m g _° x o S m m 5 5 LL G.$ �. c, . o LE-1 › J J M _ -f o Z U co _ U 0 _ 2 ry 4 6 J Resolution No. 16-067 - Page 38 of 49 tremendous opportunity for Rancho Cucamonga to maintain its leadership in the environmental arena. The vision for this focus area includes: • Concentrating heavy industrial uses • Supporting infrastructure improvements to attract industrial, manufacturing, and green technology uses • Preventing encroachment of conflicting uses that would diminish the utility of the area for heavy industry Hillsides The Hillside Focus Area is in unincorporated San Bernardino County, adjacent to Rancho Cucamonga's northern border; it lies within the City's Sphere of Influence. Most of the area consists of undeveloped hillsides, although large-lot residential subdivisions have been established in the areas designated Hillside Residential (0.1 to 2.0 du/ac) and Open Space (0.0 to 0.10 du/ac). The area also has significant land set aside for resource conservation in Day and East Etiwanda Canyons, where no development is allowed. Hillside development in Rancho Cucamonga is regulated by the Hillside Development Ordinance, which applies to all projects on land with natural slopes of eight percent grade or greater, with some exceptions, as indicated in the Ordinance. The Hillside Overlay District. as depicted on the Development District Map in the Development Code, defines the boundaries. The Hillside Overlay District also applies to areas outside of this focus area. The Ordinance includes a comprehensive set of guidelines and standards that seek to allow for reasonable development of hillside areas while minimizing the adverse effects of grading, protecting environmentally sensitive areas, and providing for public health and safety. The Ordinance contains basic design guidelines and minimum development standards. The intent is to encourage innovative and alternative development solutions, as well as to establish minimum acceptable criteria. Clustering of units is encouraged where feasible, and positioning the units to "fit" the land and minimize grading is required. The most significant provisions of the Ordinance involve the use of: • Slope development standards, which require development integration with the slope and increasingly restrictive grading and structural design as the slope increases • A slope density formula, which limits the maximum possible density allowed based upon the slope gradient • Building envelopes, which limit the maximum allowable building height to 30 feet, as measured from the finished grade Table LUQ-98: Slope Development Guidelines establishes the design, grading, and development criteria associated with various slope conditions. These guidelines are further defined in the Hillside Development Ordinance. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-S1 Resolution No. 16-067 - Page 39 of 49 Table LU-196: Slope Development Guidelines Percent Natural Slope Guidelines 5 or less This is not a hillside condition. Grading with conventional, fully padded lots and terracing is acceptable. 5 to 7.9 Development with grading is permitted in this zone, but existing landforms must retain their natural character. Padded building sites are permitted, however, techniques such as contour grading, combined slopes, limited cut and fill, and split level architecture, or padding for the structures only, may be required to reduce grading. When in conjunction with the techniques described above, and for a project within a master plan which includes special design features such as a golf course, extensive open space, or significant use of green belts or paseos, the Planning Commission may consider the use of mass grading techniques adjacent to these special design features as partial compliance with this standard. 8 to 14.9 This is a hillside condition. Special hillside architectural and design techniques that minimize grading are required in this zone. Architectural prototypes are expected to conform to the natural landform by using techniques such as split level foundations of greater than 18 Inches, stem walls, stacking and clustering. In conjunction with the alternative techniques described above, and for a project within a master plan which includes special design features such as a golf course, extensive open space or significant use of green belts or paseos, the Planning Commission may consider padded building sites adjacent to those special features when it is found that said grading creates a better relationship between that special design feature and the adjacent lots. 15 to 29.9 Development within this zone is limited to no more than the less visually prominent slopes, and then only where it can be shown that safety, environmental and aesthetic impacts can be minimized. Use of larger lots, variable setbacks and variable building structural techniques such as stepped, or pole foundations are expected. Structures shall blend with the natural environment through their shape, materials, and colors. Impact of traffic and roadways is to be minimized by following natural contours,or using grade separations. 30 and over This is an excessive slope condition and development is prohibited. The vision for the Hillside Focus Area includes: • Limit development to densities that do not exceed the capacity of the City to provide public services and adequate public safety or the capacity of the land; in particular, the City's ability to protect any new development from wildland and fires is a significant concern • Protect visually prominent natural landforms and other sensitive land resources • Protect natural resources and sensitive habitat • Provide opportunities to experience natural habitats through education programs for students and trail extensions • Maintain a natural "visual frame"for the northern edge of the City Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-52 RANCHO CUCAMONGA G E N E RAL PLAN Resolution No. 16-067 - Page 40 of 49 Table LU-2 ): General Plan Land Use Designations and Development District Consistency Matrix Land Use Development Districts Residential Very Low VL-Very Low Low L-Low Low Medium LM-Low Medium' Medium M-Medium' Medium High MH-Medium High High H-High Commercial Office OP-Office and Professional Neighborhood Commercial NC-Neighborhood Commercial Community Commercial GC-General Commercial Commercial Recreation Mixed Use Mixed Use SP-Specific Plan Districts PC-Planned Community Districts Industrial Industrial Park IP-Industrial Park General Industrial GI-General Industrial Heavy Industrial HI/MI-Heavy Industrial/Minimum Impact HI/RS-Heavy Industrial/Rail-Served Open Space Hillside Residential HR-Hillside Residential District Conservation Open Space OS-Open Space Flood Control/Utility Corridor FC-Flood Control UC-Utility Corridor Public Facility Civic/Regional All Zoning Districts Schools All Zoning Districts Parks All Zoning Districts Note: 1. Development Code allows multi-unit residential in LM (Low Medium) under optional standards, and single-unit detached residential in M(Medium)under optional standards. Adopted Specific Plans The Specific Plans and Planned Communities identified in Table LU-24-10 and Figure LU-5 have been approved by the City. In 1999, the Development Code was amended to incorporate the Industrial Area Specific Plan and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. These Specific Plans are no longer stand-alone documents. A summary of each is provided below. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-54 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GE N E RAL PLAN Resolution No. 16-067 - Page 41 of 49 Table LU-24 }: . cific Specific Plans Etiwanda North Specific Plan 6,850 1992 Etiwanda Specific Plan 3,000 1983 Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan 560 1987 Industrial Area Specific Plan 5,000 1981 Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan(Empire Lakes) 380 1994 Planned Communities Caryn Planned Community Development Plan 244 1986 Terra Vista Community Plan 1,321 1983 Victoria Community Plan 2,150 1981 Etiwanda North Specific Plan The same development pressure that prompted the 1983 Etiwanda Specific Plan also necessitated the need for the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, adopted in 1992. The plan area is located just north of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. A portion of the Specific Plan area lies outside the City and outside the Sphere of Influence. Open space is the most prominent feature of the Etiwanda North area, which is comprised of a gently sloping alluvial fan and chaparral habitat situated on the lower slopes of the foothills. Drainage courses throughout the Etiwanda North area support a variety of tree species, including oak, sycamore, and walnut, among others A unique feature of the area is a freshwater marsh, approximately 11 acres in size, located in the northwestern portion of the area. Open space is expected to remain a prominent feature even after development occurs. The Specific Plan builds upon the unique character and charm of the Etiwanda Specific Plan area by providing a land use pattern that extends the low-density character of Old Etiwanda into the Etiwanda North area. Etiwanda Specific Plan Etiwanda can be described as a rural community, characterized by large land parcels, eucalyptus tree rows, remnants of citrus groves and vineyards, stone curbs, and other elements that convey its unique and historic sense of place. The Specific Plan area is located within the northeast corner of the City and is roughly bounded by the 1-15 to the southeast, the City's Sphere of Influence to the north, the Victoria Planned Community to the west and the City's industrial area to the south. The Specific Plan project area encompasses over 3,000 acres. The main purpose of the Specific Plan is to ensure the continued rural character of this portion of the City. Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan provides a balanced and unified pattern of development along Foothill Boulevard by taking advantage of opportunities in future community growth. The plan calls for a series of activity centers and gateways, linked through a unifying suburban parkway design. Managing Land Use, Community Design,and Historic Resources RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN LU-55 Resolution No. 16-067 - Page 42 of 49 I ' N. j- • Landscai .,j.:,,i'. ,i .'+ , — -- and mea' kr 1 are some a �\ . characte _ ��i iy%N f �r Boulevar listik 1iiii‘ k � _. __ _ .. .I . - ..% t '''*',.'..IP.. r '''S.: .'.-r:-4 .%,-, '-'''UMW'.''. '-. .• ...k" — • ., , . i....*. t:....lc' ,...It:41'1'.-' '''..-.7.7.-*i-7\''.4--: The roadways in Table LU-2211 are designated "Special Boulevards" and are to incorporate extensive landscape setback areas, and denote where landscape and hardscape design, trails, and setback standards will be master planned and implemented. All major arterials (divided and undivided) are identified as Special Boulevards, as well as several important secondary and collector segments. The landscape prominence of these roadways has been and will continue to be a focus in the design process for both the private and public sectors. These linkages are described in Table LU-11 in terms of location, improvement classification, and applicable implementation mechanism. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU 82 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Resolution No. 16-067 - Page 43 of 49 jableLUil: General Plan Special Boulevards . Haven North City boundary to Pacific Haven Avenue Beautification Master Plan Avenue Electric Trail Pacific Electric Trail to Foothill Terra Vista Planned Community and Haven Avenue Beautification Master Plan Foothill to 4" Street Industrial Area Specific Plan and Haven Avenue Beautification Master Plan Milliken Hillside to 19th Street Caryn Planned Community Avenue Victoria Planned Community and Milliken 19th to Base Line Road Avenue Beautification Master Plan Base Line Road to Foothill Terra Vista Planned Community and Milliken Boulevard Avenue Beautification Master Plan Foothill Boulevard to 4th Street Industrial Area Specific Plan and Milliken Avenue Beautification Master Plan Day Creek SR-210 Freeway to Foothill Day Creek Boulevard Scenic/Recreation Boulevard Boulevard Corridor Master Plan Base Line Haven Avenue to Rochester Terra Vista Planned Community and Base Road Avenue Line Road Beautification Master Plan Rochester Avenue to Day Creek Day Creek Boulevard Scenic/Recreation Boulevard Corridor Master Plan Community and Base Line Road Beautification Master Plan Day Creek Boulevard to Victoria Planned Community Etiwanda Avenue Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue Etiwanda Specific Plan Community and Base Line Road Beautification Master Plan West of Haven Avenue Base Line Road Beautification Master Plan Foothill Grove Avenue to Eastern Boulevard boundary of Subarea 3 of Foothill Foothill Specific Plan Specific Plan:and 1-15 to East Avenue Western boundary of Industrial Area Specific Plan to Day Creek Industrial Area Specific Plan Boulevard Day Creek Boulevard to 1-15 Victoria Specific Plan Freeway Arrow Industrial Area Specific Plan and adjacent Highway Grove Avenue to East Avenue development for segment between Archibald Avenue and Haven Avenue Church Haven Avenue to Day Creek Street Boulevard Day Creek Boulevard to eastern Victoria Planned Community boundary of Victoria Planned Community 6th Street West of Haven Avenue to Industrial Area Specific Plan and 6th Street Hellman Avenue Beautification Master Plan 4th Street West of Archibald Avenue to City 4th Street Beautification Master Plan boundary Archibald Northern boundary of City to Archibald Avenue Beautification Master Plan Avenue Arrow Highway Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RAN C H O CUCAMONGA G E N E RAL PLAN LU-83 Resolution No. 16-067 - Page 44 of 49 Table LU-2,11 1: General Plan Special Boulevards Street Street Segment Implementation Name Arrow Highway to 4" Street Industrial Area Specific Plan and Archibald Avenue Beautification Master Plan Rochester Base Line Road to Foothill Terra Vista Planned Community Avenue Boulevard Foothill Boulevard to southern Industrial Area Specific Plan City limits Miller Eastern boundary of Victoria Avenue Planned Community to East Etiwanda Specific Plan Avenue Etiwanda Wilson Avenue to Arrow Highway Etiwanda and Foothill Specific Plans Avenue East Avenue Wilson Avenue to Foothill Etiwanda Specific Plan Boulevard Wilson Haven Avenue to Milliken Adjacent Development Avenue Avenue Victoria Park Milliken Avenue to Base Line Victoria Planned Community Lane Road Beautification Master Plans During the late 1980s and into the early '90s, Rancho Cucamonga prepared Beautification Master Plans for many of the Special Boulevards. These plans sought to provide consistent direction to development and establish attractive design themes that would reinforce the City's high design standards. In general, the Beautification Master Plans go beyond the typical parkway street tree concept and integrate street enhancement plans into a broader landscape fabric within the entire parkway setback area. Most of the concepts incorporate background or accent trees, rockscape, and even perimeter walls. Design objectives of the Beautification Master Plans are to: • Provide identifiable themes along major streets • Provide attractive, enduring, and maintainable streetscapes • Complement other community improvements • Protect the public's health, safety, and welfare These plans are being successfully implemented throughout the City. Table LU-2,312 lists the Beautification Master Plans and the design focus of each concept. Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-84 RAN C H O CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Resolution No. 16-067 - Page 45 of 49 Tab Archibald Avenue 111 Parkway/background/accent trees,perimeter walls Base Line Road,west of Haven Avenue Parkway/background/accent trees Base Line Road,east of Haven Avenue Parkway/background trees,entire median Day Creek Boulevard Parkway/background/accent trees,entire median, perimeter walls,community art Haven Avenue Parkway/background trees,entire median Milliken Avenue Parkway/background trees,entire median ;'4" Street Parkway/background/accent trees,shrubs and hardscape 6th Street Parkway trees, entire median 19"'Street Parkway/accent trees,perimeter walls Historic/Special Design Streets Certain roadway sections are worthy of special treatment due to their historic character: Etiwanda Avenue, Hillside Road, Hellman Avenue, and Foothill Boulevard. Provisions for maintaining and/or replacing the trees should be developed to address fire and public safety issues as they occur. ■ Etiwanda Avenue. Etiwanda Avenue, from Wilson Avenue to Foothill Boulevard, was established in 1883 as the main north/south spine through the Etiwanda Colony Lands. The street retains the original rock curbs, eucalyptus tree windrows, and rural character associated with low-density development. Future roadway designs have been adopted as part of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The basic design intent is to maintain the current street widths, rock curbs, and existing street trees where possible, and enhance the rural character with additional informal plantings, trails, and extensive setbacks. As future development is proposed, the City needs to carefully define those areas where change to the historic streetscape is required because of traffic demand and public safety. Implementation strategies to discourage the use of Etiwanda Avenue for through traffic should be developed and considered in all future projects along this route. • Hillside Road. The segment of Hillside Road between Alta Loma Channel and Hermosa Avenue has been designated for special historic significance, and plans have been developed consistent with its historic character. • Hellman Avenue. The segment of Hellman Avenue between Base Line Road and 19th Street has been designated for special historic significance and should be studied to establish street requirements consistent with its historic character. • Foothill Boulevard/Historic Route 66. Foothill Boulevard is a unique historic route for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Southern California, and the western United States. Officially, the numerical designation 66 was assigned to the Chicago-to-Los Angeles route in the summer of 1926. From the outset, public road planners intended Route 66 to connect the main streets of rural and urban communities along its course for the most practical of reasons: most small towns had no prior access to a major national Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RAN C H O CUCAMONGA G E N E RAL PLAN LU-85 Resolution No. 16-067 - Page 46 of 49 thoroughfare. Route 66 runs east to west through Rancho Cucamonga and contains historic resources potentially significant for their association with Route 66. Foothill Boulevard/Historic Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan /(c. Supplemental to the Special Boulevards designation, the Foothill Boulevard/Historic '•-• ,. Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan (adopted January 2002) guides the design _ concepts for the streetscapes, entry areas, and rights-of-way of Foothill Boulevard/Historic Route 66 through the entirety of its run through Rancho Cucamonga. The plan acknowledges the importance of Foothill Boulevard/Historic Route 66 to America's culture and heritage, and works to enhance and reflect the unique historic elements of Historic Route 66 and Rancho Cucamonga. The plan draws upon positive improvements to Foothill Boulevard/Historic Route 66 and develops a set of unique and unifying historic themes that will be implemented along the Boulevard. The plan provides specific design concepts for the western and eastern gateways into the City, and for eight centers along the Foothill Boulevard corridor. The plan also provides concepts for the Suburban Parkway Enhancement Areas at various locations, a unifying palette of streetscape furniture, unique Route 66 icons, artwork, and various other visual enhancement concepts that can be utilized in future developments and improvements along the Boulevard. Foothill E Route 66 Utility Infrastructure Enhancements Plan has signage Improving the visual streetscape in Rancho Cucamonga can be accomplished by reflect th placing overhead utilities underground. Undergrounding utility lines helps maintain heritage views of the San Bernardino Mountains and avoids visual clutter. Many newer boulevar districts and residential neighborhoods have had most utility lines installed underground during their initial development. However, many older neighborhoods still have overhead utility lines. Placing overhead utilities underground remains an important aspect of enhancing the aesthetic quality in neighborhoods and major street corridors. A major impediment to undergrounding utility lines is cost. Rancho Cucamonga will consider undergrounding utilities along commercial corridors where it can enhance the streetscape and improve the overall image of the street. Residential neighborhoods interested in removing overhead utilities must work with the City and possibly set up an assessment district or other financing system to help pay for the costs of such improvement. Entry Monuments Entry monuments provide the first impression of Rancho Cucamonga as visitors enter the City. Special attention has been given to the development and design of these gateways. A plan for entry monuments was developed, and a number of intersections have entry monuments installed. The number and location of entry monuments are shown in Figure LU-7: Entry Monument Locations. The letters identifying each gateway correspond to a description of the gateway, provided in Table LU-2413: Entry Monuments Design Elements. Each site will have to be designed to complement the surrounding streetscape and architecture, while following the design. LU 86 Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources RAN C H O CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Resolution No. 16-067 - Page 47 of 49 Table LU-24 Entry Monuments Design E ements , • This existing gateway has elements of Mission Revival form,with cobblestone wails. A Its elements may be included in future gateway locations where a more historic or traditional look is desired. B The eastern half of this gateway was completed first and the western side was designed to match it. This existing gateway is constructed of cobblestone,concrete,and granite tiles with applied brass letters. Both sides of the street are completed. D This gateway Is completed and will act as an example for future smaller entry monumentation. This gateway should be designed to generally follow existing gateway D,on the E northwest corner of the intersection,with placement and landscaping to complement the adjacent design elements. F This gateway should be similar to existing gateway D.The design should complement the adjacent landscaping in its placement and landscaping. This gateway is located on Historic Route 66,and should be designed to follow the G more historic style of gateway A.The design should also incorporate text and graphics identifying Historic Route 66.This gateway should match gateway Q. H This gateway should be on the north side of the street.The design should complement the adjacent landscaping in its placement and landscaping. This gateway should be designed to generally follow gateway D,on the northeast corner of the intersection,with placement and landscaping to complement the adjacent design elements. If the area for the gateway placement is limited,a design similar to existing gateway P should be utilized. J The conceptual design for this gateway is complete. These gateways will identify the City from the SR-210 off ramps. Ideally the K,L,M,N gateways would be at the intersection of the major street and each off ramp,as shown in the illustration in Figure LU-6.The gateways should be similar to existing gateway D,with placement and landscaping to match adjacent design elements. This gateway should be designed to generally follow gateway D,on the south side Q of the street,with placement and landscaping to complement the adjacent design elements.If the area for the gateway placement is limited,a design similar to existing gateway P should be utilized. P This gateway is a small existing cobblestone and concrete gateway. This gateway is located on the Historic Route 66, and should be designed to follow Q the more historic style of gateway A.The design should also incorporate text and graphics identifying Historic Route 66.This gateway should match gateway G. This gateway should be on the south side of Arrow Highway, and similar in forms R and materials to existing gateway D.The design should complement the adjacent landscaping in its placement and planting. This gateway should be designed to generally follow gateway D,on the northeast corner of the intersection,with placement and landscaping to complement the adjacent design elements. If the area for the gateway placement is limited,a design similar to existing gateway P should be utilized. This gateway should be on both sides of Vineyard Avenue,and similar in forms and T materials to existing gateway A.The design should complement the adjacent landscaping in its placement and planting. Note:Descriptions ore keyed to locations shown on Figure LU-6, Entry Monument Locations. Managing Land Use, Community Design,and Historic Resources LU-88 RANCHOCUCAMONGA G E N E RAL PLAN Resolution No. 16-067 - Page 48 of 49 Creating Pedestrian Connectivity duction 1 eying Our Vision 2 Land Use 4 Land Use Goals and Policies 61 Community Design 74 Community Design Goals and Policies 99 Historic Resources 105 Historic Preservation Goals and Policies 118 List of Tables Table LU-1: Land Use Distribution -2009 4 Table LU-2: Victoria Gardens/Victoria Arbors Land Use Mix 23 Table-W-3-M edUse.Town Center(- -and Rayon Avonuo) 27 T -Uco: Than Vista 28 • -. '• -. - - 2' Hercnosa Avonuo 28 Table -Feothill Avenue-and Holtman Avenue 30 Table LU 7: Mixed Use: Foothill-Boulev3 and Hampshire Street 31 Tabled : Foothill Boulevard-and Mayten Avenue- 33 Table LU-93: Mixed Use: Industrial Area Specific Plan/Subarea 18 34 Table--U-0 4ixed4Use Foothil Boulevard-and Deer Creek Channel 34 table - .- - -• -•- - -- -• - 35 .. . : - - - oothill Gatoway Bear Gulch Area) 36 Tablo LU 13: Mixed Use: Foothill Boulevard Cucamonga Channel Site 36 Table LU 14: Mixed-Use Altat a - - 38 Table LU-4-64: Build-Out Summary 40 Table LU-465: Land Use Plan Summary-Residential Designations 41 Table LU-476: Land Use Plan Summary-Non-Residential Designations 42 Table LU-87: Build Out Summary by Land Use 44 Table LU-4-98: Slope Development Guidelines 52 Table LU-299: General Plan Land Use Designations and Development District Consistency Matrix 54 Table LU-2410: Adopted Specific Plans and Planned Communities 55 Table LU-211: General Plan Special Boulevards 83 Table LU-2312: Beautification Master Plans 85 Table LU-2413: Entry Monuments Design Elements 88 List of Figures Figure LU-1: Floor-Area Ratio(FAR) 9 Figure LU-2: Land Use Plan 11 Figure LU-3: Mixed Use Areas 24 Figure LU-4: Focus Areas 48 Figure LU-5: Specific Plans and Planned Communities 56 Figure LU-6: Community Design Framework 80 Figure LU-7: Entry Monument Locations 87 Figure LU-8: Historic Resources 114 Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources LU-128 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Resolution No. 16-067 - Page 49 of 49